From 32fd9b8e829188490940676411ab69634087e623 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jasonqi146 Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2023 11:20:38 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] added new data --- ...4_Redis_Easy_No_Slide_No_Filter_Format.json | 1 + llm_rl/data/dataset_info.json | 4 ++++ llm_rl/finetune-mistral-7b.sh | 18 +++++++++--------- llm_rl/preprocess/create_sft_data.py | 4 ++-- 4 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) create mode 100644 llm_rl/data/GPT4-4_Redis_Easy_No_Slide_No_Filter_Format.json diff --git a/llm_rl/data/GPT4-4_Redis_Easy_No_Slide_No_Filter_Format.json b/llm_rl/data/GPT4-4_Redis_Easy_No_Slide_No_Filter_Format.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000..5f739cd6 --- /dev/null +++ b/llm_rl/data/GPT4-4_Redis_Easy_No_Slide_No_Filter_Format.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +[{"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Rafael Cortez, your task is to act/speak as Rafael Cortez would, keeping in mind Rafael Cortez's social goal.\nYou can find Rafael Cortez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Rafael Cortez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Rafael Cortez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation taking place in an annual charity event between two attendees.\nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Jaxon Prentice\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. Personality and values description: Rafael Cortez, with his outgoing nature and competitive spirit, believes in self-direction. He employs a systematic approach to his decisions. Rafael's secrets: He cheated on his medical school exams.\nJaxon Prentice's background: Jaxon Prentice is a 40-year-old male investigative journalist. He/him pronouns. Jaxon Prentice, an investigative journalist, is known for his brisk jogging sessions early in the morning and his active participation in community functions. \nRafael Cortez's goal: Convince the other person to donate $1 a day to a charity that helps feed children in need (Extra information: this donation would help to feed a child for a month)\nJaxon Prentice's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Good evening, Jaxon! Lovely evening, isn't it? I see these charity events bring out the best in people. Speaking of, I've been involved with this incredible charity that works towards feeding children in need. Just a dollar a day can provide a meal for a child for a whole month. Can I count on your support?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Rafael Cortez, your task is to act/speak as Rafael Cortez would, keeping in mind Rafael Cortez's social goal.\nYou can find Rafael Cortez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Rafael Cortez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Rafael Cortez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation taking place in an annual charity event between two attendees.\nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Jaxon Prentice\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. Personality and values description: Rafael Cortez, with his outgoing nature and competitive spirit, believes in self-direction. He employs a systematic approach to his decisions. Rafael's secrets: He cheated on his medical school exams.\nJaxon Prentice's background: Jaxon Prentice is a 40-year-old male investigative journalist. He/him pronouns. Jaxon Prentice, an investigative journalist, is known for his brisk jogging sessions early in the morning and his active participation in community functions. \nRafael Cortez's goal: Convince the other person to donate $1 a day to a charity that helps feed children in need (Extra information: this donation would help to feed a child for a month)\nJaxon Prentice's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening, Jaxon! Lovely evening, isn't it? I see these charity events bring out the best in people. Speaking of, I've been involved with this incredible charity that works towards feeding children in need. Just a dollar a day can provide a meal for a child for a whole month. Can I count on your support?\"\n\nTurn #1: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Good evening, Rafael! This is indeed a worthy cause, and I appreciate your dedication. I'm interested in supporting, but I'll be honest, my budget is tight these days. How about this? I can offer a one-time contribution that fits within my financial means. Would that be acceptable?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Certainly, Jaxon! Any contribution can make a huge difference. Your generosity is genuinely appreciated, and I'm sure it'll go a long way in helping these children. By the way, it's also an opportunity for your readers to learn about this charity when you share it in your next story. What do you think about that?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Rafael Cortez, your task is to act/speak as Rafael Cortez would, keeping in mind Rafael Cortez's social goal.\nYou can find Rafael Cortez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Rafael Cortez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Rafael Cortez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation taking place in an annual charity event between two attendees.\nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Jaxon Prentice\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. Personality and values description: Rafael Cortez, with his outgoing nature and competitive spirit, believes in self-direction. He employs a systematic approach to his decisions. Rafael's secrets: He cheated on his medical school exams.\nJaxon Prentice's background: Jaxon Prentice is a 40-year-old male investigative journalist. He/him pronouns. Jaxon Prentice, an investigative journalist, is known for his brisk jogging sessions early in the morning and his active participation in community functions. \nRafael Cortez's goal: Convince the other person to donate $1 a day to a charity that helps feed children in need (Extra information: this donation would help to feed a child for a month)\nJaxon Prentice's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening, Jaxon! Lovely evening, isn't it? I see these charity events bring out the best in people. Speaking of, I've been involved with this incredible charity that works towards feeding children in need. Just a dollar a day can provide a meal for a child for a whole month. Can I count on your support?\"\n\nTurn #1: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Good evening, Rafael! This is indeed a worthy cause, and I appreciate your dedication. I'm interested in supporting, but I'll be honest, my budget is tight these days. How about this? I can offer a one-time contribution that fits within my financial means. Would that be acceptable?\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Certainly, Jaxon! Any contribution can make a huge difference. Your generosity is genuinely appreciated, and I'm sure it'll go a long way in helping these children. By the way, it's also an opportunity for your readers to learn about this charity when you share it in your next story. What do you think about that?\"\n\nTurn #3: Jaxon Prentice said: \"That's a great idea, Rafael! Encouraging my readers to support this charity will surely make a bigger difference. I'm all in for using my platform to bring about positive change. Let's arrange a time after the event to talk more about the specifics and how I can get the word out effectively.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad to hear that, Jaxon! Your influence can truly make a difference. Let's definitely follow up after the event to discuss the specifics. Thanks once again for your willingness and generosity. Together, we can certainly make a positive change.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Rafael Cortez, your task is to act/speak as Rafael Cortez would, keeping in mind Rafael Cortez's social goal.\nYou can find Rafael Cortez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Rafael Cortez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Rafael Cortez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation taking place in an annual charity event between two attendees.\nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Jaxon Prentice\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. Personality and values description: Rafael Cortez, with his outgoing nature and competitive spirit, believes in self-direction. He employs a systematic approach to his decisions. Rafael's secrets: He cheated on his medical school exams.\nJaxon Prentice's background: Jaxon Prentice is a 40-year-old male investigative journalist. He/him pronouns. Jaxon Prentice, an investigative journalist, is known for his brisk jogging sessions early in the morning and his active participation in community functions. \nRafael Cortez's goal: Convince the other person to donate $1 a day to a charity that helps feed children in need (Extra information: this donation would help to feed a child for a month)\nJaxon Prentice's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening, Jaxon! Lovely evening, isn't it? I see these charity events bring out the best in people. Speaking of, I've been involved with this incredible charity that works towards feeding children in need. Just a dollar a day can provide a meal for a child for a whole month. Can I count on your support?\"\n\nTurn #1: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Good evening, Rafael! This is indeed a worthy cause, and I appreciate your dedication. I'm interested in supporting, but I'll be honest, my budget is tight these days. How about this? I can offer a one-time contribution that fits within my financial means. Would that be acceptable?\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Certainly, Jaxon! Any contribution can make a huge difference. Your generosity is genuinely appreciated, and I'm sure it'll go a long way in helping these children. By the way, it's also an opportunity for your readers to learn about this charity when you share it in your next story. What do you think about that?\"\n\nTurn #3: Jaxon Prentice said: \"That's a great idea, Rafael! Encouraging my readers to support this charity will surely make a bigger difference. I'm all in for using my platform to bring about positive change. Let's arrange a time after the event to talk more about the specifics and how I can get the word out effectively.\"\n\nTurn #4: Rafael Cortez said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Jaxon! Your influence can truly make a difference. Let's definitely follow up after the event to discuss the specifics. Thanks once again for your willingness and generosity. Together, we can certainly make a positive change.\"\n\nTurn #5: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Absolutely, Rafael! It's refreshing to see passion and dedication at play. Indeed, together we can look forward to making a positive impact. Let's connect after tonight's event then. Enjoy the rest of the evening!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Rafael Cortez, your task is to act/speak as Rafael Cortez would, keeping in mind Rafael Cortez's social goal.\nYou can find Rafael Cortez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Rafael Cortez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Rafael Cortez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation taking place in an annual charity event between two attendees.\nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Jaxon Prentice\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. Personality and values description: Rafael Cortez, with his outgoing nature and competitive spirit, believes in self-direction. He employs a systematic approach to his decisions. Rafael's secrets: He cheated on his medical school exams.\nJaxon Prentice's background: Jaxon Prentice is a 40-year-old male investigative journalist. He/him pronouns. Jaxon Prentice, an investigative journalist, is known for his brisk jogging sessions early in the morning and his active participation in community functions. \nRafael Cortez's goal: Convince the other person to donate $1 a day to a charity that helps feed children in need (Extra information: this donation would help to feed a child for a month)\nJaxon Prentice's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening, Jaxon! Lovely evening, isn't it? I see these charity events bring out the best in people. Speaking of, I've been involved with this incredible charity that works towards feeding children in need. Just a dollar a day can provide a meal for a child for a whole month. Can I count on your support?\"\n\nTurn #1: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Good evening, Rafael! This is indeed a worthy cause, and I appreciate your dedication. I'm interested in supporting, but I'll be honest, my budget is tight these days. How about this? I can offer a one-time contribution that fits within my financial means. Would that be acceptable?\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Certainly, Jaxon! Any contribution can make a huge difference. Your generosity is genuinely appreciated, and I'm sure it'll go a long way in helping these children. By the way, it's also an opportunity for your readers to learn about this charity when you share it in your next story. What do you think about that?\"\n\nTurn #3: Jaxon Prentice said: \"That's a great idea, Rafael! Encouraging my readers to support this charity will surely make a bigger difference. I'm all in for using my platform to bring about positive change. Let's arrange a time after the event to talk more about the specifics and how I can get the word out effectively.\"\n\nTurn #4: Rafael Cortez said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Jaxon! Your influence can truly make a difference. Let's definitely follow up after the event to discuss the specifics. Thanks once again for your willingness and generosity. Together, we can certainly make a positive change.\"\n\nTurn #5: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Absolutely, Rafael! It's refreshing to see passion and dedication at play. Indeed, together we can look forward to making a positive impact. Let's connect after tonight's event then. Enjoy the rest of the evening!\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: \n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Jaxon Prentice, your task is to act/speak as Jaxon Prentice would, keeping in mind Jaxon Prentice's social goal.\nYou can find Jaxon Prentice's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Jaxon Prentice's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Jaxon Prentice's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation taking place in an annual charity event between two attendees.\nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Jaxon Prentice\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. \nJaxon Prentice's background: Jaxon Prentice is a 40-year-old male investigative journalist. He/him pronouns. Jaxon Prentice, an investigative journalist, is known for his brisk jogging sessions early in the morning and his active participation in community functions. Personality and values description: Jaxon Prentice, outgoing yet erratic, emphasizes achievement, power, and security. His decisions swing between quick adaptations to situations and careful planning. Jaxon's secrets: Fabricated evidence to incriminate a corrupt politician\nRafael Cortez's goal: Unknown\nJaxon Prentice's goal: Donate but maintain financial stability (Extra information: you are willing to donate but you have a tight budget, $1 a day might be steep for your current financial situation. Hint: you might want to negotiate a lower daily amount or suggest a one-time donation.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening, Jaxon! Lovely evening, isn't it? I see these charity events bring out the best in people. Speaking of, I've been involved with this incredible charity that works towards feeding children in need. Just a dollar a day can provide a meal for a child for a whole month. Can I count on your support?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Good evening, Rafael! This is indeed a worthy cause, and I appreciate your dedication. I'm interested in supporting, but I'll be honest, my budget is tight these days. How about this? I can offer a one-time contribution that fits within my financial means. Would that be acceptable?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Jaxon Prentice, your task is to act/speak as Jaxon Prentice would, keeping in mind Jaxon Prentice's social goal.\nYou can find Jaxon Prentice's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Jaxon Prentice's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Jaxon Prentice's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation taking place in an annual charity event between two attendees.\nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Jaxon Prentice\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. \nJaxon Prentice's background: Jaxon Prentice is a 40-year-old male investigative journalist. He/him pronouns. Jaxon Prentice, an investigative journalist, is known for his brisk jogging sessions early in the morning and his active participation in community functions. Personality and values description: Jaxon Prentice, outgoing yet erratic, emphasizes achievement, power, and security. His decisions swing between quick adaptations to situations and careful planning. Jaxon's secrets: Fabricated evidence to incriminate a corrupt politician\nRafael Cortez's goal: Unknown\nJaxon Prentice's goal: Donate but maintain financial stability (Extra information: you are willing to donate but you have a tight budget, $1 a day might be steep for your current financial situation. Hint: you might want to negotiate a lower daily amount or suggest a one-time donation.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening, Jaxon! Lovely evening, isn't it? I see these charity events bring out the best in people. Speaking of, I've been involved with this incredible charity that works towards feeding children in need. Just a dollar a day can provide a meal for a child for a whole month. Can I count on your support?\"\n\nTurn #1: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Good evening, Rafael! This is indeed a worthy cause, and I appreciate your dedication. I'm interested in supporting, but I'll be honest, my budget is tight these days. How about this? I can offer a one-time contribution that fits within my financial means. Would that be acceptable?\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Certainly, Jaxon! Any contribution can make a huge difference. Your generosity is genuinely appreciated, and I'm sure it'll go a long way in helping these children. By the way, it's also an opportunity for your readers to learn about this charity when you share it in your next story. What do you think about that?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's a great idea, Rafael! Encouraging my readers to support this charity will surely make a bigger difference. I'm all in for using my platform to bring about positive change. Let's arrange a time after the event to talk more about the specifics and how I can get the word out effectively.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Jaxon Prentice, your task is to act/speak as Jaxon Prentice would, keeping in mind Jaxon Prentice's social goal.\nYou can find Jaxon Prentice's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Jaxon Prentice's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Jaxon Prentice's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation taking place in an annual charity event between two attendees.\nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Jaxon Prentice\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. \nJaxon Prentice's background: Jaxon Prentice is a 40-year-old male investigative journalist. He/him pronouns. Jaxon Prentice, an investigative journalist, is known for his brisk jogging sessions early in the morning and his active participation in community functions. Personality and values description: Jaxon Prentice, outgoing yet erratic, emphasizes achievement, power, and security. His decisions swing between quick adaptations to situations and careful planning. Jaxon's secrets: Fabricated evidence to incriminate a corrupt politician\nRafael Cortez's goal: Unknown\nJaxon Prentice's goal: Donate but maintain financial stability (Extra information: you are willing to donate but you have a tight budget, $1 a day might be steep for your current financial situation. Hint: you might want to negotiate a lower daily amount or suggest a one-time donation.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening, Jaxon! Lovely evening, isn't it? I see these charity events bring out the best in people. Speaking of, I've been involved with this incredible charity that works towards feeding children in need. Just a dollar a day can provide a meal for a child for a whole month. Can I count on your support?\"\n\nTurn #1: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Good evening, Rafael! This is indeed a worthy cause, and I appreciate your dedication. I'm interested in supporting, but I'll be honest, my budget is tight these days. How about this? I can offer a one-time contribution that fits within my financial means. Would that be acceptable?\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Certainly, Jaxon! Any contribution can make a huge difference. Your generosity is genuinely appreciated, and I'm sure it'll go a long way in helping these children. By the way, it's also an opportunity for your readers to learn about this charity when you share it in your next story. What do you think about that?\"\n\nTurn #3: Jaxon Prentice said: \"That's a great idea, Rafael! Encouraging my readers to support this charity will surely make a bigger difference. I'm all in for using my platform to bring about positive change. Let's arrange a time after the event to talk more about the specifics and how I can get the word out effectively.\"\n\nTurn #4: Rafael Cortez said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Jaxon! Your influence can truly make a difference. Let's definitely follow up after the event to discuss the specifics. Thanks once again for your willingness and generosity. Together, we can certainly make a positive change.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Rafael! It's refreshing to see passion and dedication at play. Indeed, together we can look forward to making a positive impact. Let's connect after tonight's event then. Enjoy the rest of the evening!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Jaxon Prentice, your task is to act/speak as Jaxon Prentice would, keeping in mind Jaxon Prentice's social goal.\nYou can find Jaxon Prentice's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Jaxon Prentice's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Jaxon Prentice's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation taking place in an annual charity event between two attendees.\nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Jaxon Prentice\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. \nJaxon Prentice's background: Jaxon Prentice is a 40-year-old male investigative journalist. He/him pronouns. Jaxon Prentice, an investigative journalist, is known for his brisk jogging sessions early in the morning and his active participation in community functions. Personality and values description: Jaxon Prentice, outgoing yet erratic, emphasizes achievement, power, and security. His decisions swing between quick adaptations to situations and careful planning. Jaxon's secrets: Fabricated evidence to incriminate a corrupt politician\nRafael Cortez's goal: Unknown\nJaxon Prentice's goal: Donate but maintain financial stability (Extra information: you are willing to donate but you have a tight budget, $1 a day might be steep for your current financial situation. Hint: you might want to negotiate a lower daily amount or suggest a one-time donation.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening, Jaxon! Lovely evening, isn't it? I see these charity events bring out the best in people. Speaking of, I've been involved with this incredible charity that works towards feeding children in need. Just a dollar a day can provide a meal for a child for a whole month. Can I count on your support?\"\n\nTurn #1: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Good evening, Rafael! This is indeed a worthy cause, and I appreciate your dedication. I'm interested in supporting, but I'll be honest, my budget is tight these days. How about this? I can offer a one-time contribution that fits within my financial means. Would that be acceptable?\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Certainly, Jaxon! Any contribution can make a huge difference. Your generosity is genuinely appreciated, and I'm sure it'll go a long way in helping these children. By the way, it's also an opportunity for your readers to learn about this charity when you share it in your next story. What do you think about that?\"\n\nTurn #3: Jaxon Prentice said: \"That's a great idea, Rafael! Encouraging my readers to support this charity will surely make a bigger difference. I'm all in for using my platform to bring about positive change. Let's arrange a time after the event to talk more about the specifics and how I can get the word out effectively.\"\n\nTurn #4: Rafael Cortez said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Jaxon! Your influence can truly make a difference. Let's definitely follow up after the event to discuss the specifics. Thanks once again for your willingness and generosity. Together, we can certainly make a positive change.\"\n\nTurn #5: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Absolutely, Rafael! It's refreshing to see passion and dedication at play. Indeed, together we can look forward to making a positive impact. Let's connect after tonight's event then. Enjoy the rest of the evening!\"\n\nTurn #6: \n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out in a Starbucks\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nDonovan Reeves's goal: Ask what the friend would want for their birthday without letting them aware (Hint: you should not let them know that you are buying them a gift)\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Hey Ava, I was looking at this new architecture software and thought it was quite impressive. What do you think are the key features that you look for in such software? Does it align with your creative vision? Just curious to understand it better.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out in a Starbucks\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nDonovan Reeves's goal: Ask what the friend would want for their birthday without letting them aware (Hint: you should not let them know that you are buying them a gift)\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Ava, I was looking at this new architecture software and thought it was quite impressive. What do you think are the key features that you look for in such software? Does it align with your creative vision? Just curious to understand it better.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Donovan, it's great that you're taking interest in my work. I think the key features that truly make an architecture software useful are flexibility, realistic renderings, and user-friendly interfaces. It should be able to adapt to different design styles and provide a platform that closely replicates real-world settings. Also, a user-friendly interface is crucial for streamlining the workflow. In terms of aligning with my creative vision, as long as I can use a software to accurately convey my designs, that's all I need. But remember, it's not the tool but the architect that makes the magic happen.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's very insightful, Ava. From what I understand, it's really mostly about creating a realistic and user-friendly workspace that liberates your creativity, right? I\u2019ve also been noticing some remarkable architectural books in the market. Considering your love for architecture and its magic, would there be any specific book or author you\u2019d rather recommend to someone who wanted to know more?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out in a Starbucks\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nDonovan Reeves's goal: Ask what the friend would want for their birthday without letting them aware (Hint: you should not let them know that you are buying them a gift)\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Ava, I was looking at this new architecture software and thought it was quite impressive. What do you think are the key features that you look for in such software? Does it align with your creative vision? Just curious to understand it better.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Donovan, it's great that you're taking interest in my work. I think the key features that truly make an architecture software useful are flexibility, realistic renderings, and user-friendly interfaces. It should be able to adapt to different design styles and provide a platform that closely replicates real-world settings. Also, a user-friendly interface is crucial for streamlining the workflow. In terms of aligning with my creative vision, as long as I can use a software to accurately convey my designs, that's all I need. But remember, it's not the tool but the architect that makes the magic happen.\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"That's very insightful, Ava. From what I understand, it's really mostly about creating a realistic and user-friendly workspace that liberates your creativity, right? I\u2019ve also been noticing some remarkable architectural books in the market. Considering your love for architecture and its magic, would there be any specific book or author you\u2019d rather recommend to someone who wanted to know more?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Thompson said: \"You're absolutely correct, Donovan. For books, I'd recommend 'The Architecture of Happiness' by Alain de Botton. It's not so much of a technical book, but it beautifully philosophizes the impact of architecture on the mood and emotions of people. It's an excellent read even for someone not in the field. And for something a bit more technical, '101 Things I Learned in Architecture School' by Matthew Frederick provides a great introduction to key concepts in architecture. These should give you a nice glimpse into the world of architecture.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Those suggestions sound absolutely enlightening, Ava. It really got me wondering about the kind of inspiration you derive from books. Would you happen to have any favorite authors, not limited to architecture, but in general, like in literature or mystery perhaps?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out in a Starbucks\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nDonovan Reeves's goal: Ask what the friend would want for their birthday without letting them aware (Hint: you should not let them know that you are buying them a gift)\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Ava, I was looking at this new architecture software and thought it was quite impressive. What do you think are the key features that you look for in such software? Does it align with your creative vision? Just curious to understand it better.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Donovan, it's great that you're taking interest in my work. I think the key features that truly make an architecture software useful are flexibility, realistic renderings, and user-friendly interfaces. It should be able to adapt to different design styles and provide a platform that closely replicates real-world settings. Also, a user-friendly interface is crucial for streamlining the workflow. In terms of aligning with my creative vision, as long as I can use a software to accurately convey my designs, that's all I need. But remember, it's not the tool but the architect that makes the magic happen.\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"That's very insightful, Ava. From what I understand, it's really mostly about creating a realistic and user-friendly workspace that liberates your creativity, right? I\u2019ve also been noticing some remarkable architectural books in the market. Considering your love for architecture and its magic, would there be any specific book or author you\u2019d rather recommend to someone who wanted to know more?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Thompson said: \"You're absolutely correct, Donovan. For books, I'd recommend 'The Architecture of Happiness' by Alain de Botton. It's not so much of a technical book, but it beautifully philosophizes the impact of architecture on the mood and emotions of people. It's an excellent read even for someone not in the field. And for something a bit more technical, '101 Things I Learned in Architecture School' by Matthew Frederick provides a great introduction to key concepts in architecture. These should give you a nice glimpse into the world of architecture.\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"Those suggestions sound absolutely enlightening, Ava. It really got me wondering about the kind of inspiration you derive from books. Would you happen to have any favorite authors, not limited to architecture, but in general, like in literature or mystery perhaps?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Donovan, I love reading. While it's easy to assume that most of my reading would be related to architecture, I widely enjoy different genres. For literature, I'm fond of Virginia Woolf's stream-of-consciousness style. In mystery, Agatha Christie is a personal favorite, particularly the 'Hercule Poirot' series. Their works not only provide an entertaining escape but also inspire creativity in unexpected ways. Be it a building design or a murder mystery, it's all about creating a narrative, isn't it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out in a Starbucks\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nDonovan Reeves's goal: Ask what the friend would want for their birthday without letting them aware (Hint: you should not let them know that you are buying them a gift)\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Ava, I was looking at this new architecture software and thought it was quite impressive. What do you think are the key features that you look for in such software? Does it align with your creative vision? Just curious to understand it better.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Donovan, it's great that you're taking interest in my work. I think the key features that truly make an architecture software useful are flexibility, realistic renderings, and user-friendly interfaces. It should be able to adapt to different design styles and provide a platform that closely replicates real-world settings. Also, a user-friendly interface is crucial for streamlining the workflow. In terms of aligning with my creative vision, as long as I can use a software to accurately convey my designs, that's all I need. But remember, it's not the tool but the architect that makes the magic happen.\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"That's very insightful, Ava. From what I understand, it's really mostly about creating a realistic and user-friendly workspace that liberates your creativity, right? I\u2019ve also been noticing some remarkable architectural books in the market. Considering your love for architecture and its magic, would there be any specific book or author you\u2019d rather recommend to someone who wanted to know more?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Thompson said: \"You're absolutely correct, Donovan. For books, I'd recommend 'The Architecture of Happiness' by Alain de Botton. It's not so much of a technical book, but it beautifully philosophizes the impact of architecture on the mood and emotions of people. It's an excellent read even for someone not in the field. And for something a bit more technical, '101 Things I Learned in Architecture School' by Matthew Frederick provides a great introduction to key concepts in architecture. These should give you a nice glimpse into the world of architecture.\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"Those suggestions sound absolutely enlightening, Ava. It really got me wondering about the kind of inspiration you derive from books. Would you happen to have any favorite authors, not limited to architecture, but in general, like in literature or mystery perhaps?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Donovan, I love reading. While it's easy to assume that most of my reading would be related to architecture, I widely enjoy different genres. For literature, I'm fond of Virginia Woolf's stream-of-consciousness style. In mystery, Agatha Christie is a personal favorite, particularly the 'Hercule Poirot' series. Their works not only provide an entertaining escape but also inspire creativity in unexpected ways. Be it a building design or a murder mystery, it's all about creating a narrative, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Ava Thompson said: \"I see your interest in books is as genuine as mine, Donovan. How about we start a small book club of our own? We both have our areas of expertise, you in coding and technology and me in architecture and design. We could alternate between these topics...or even go beyond. I think it could be a fun way to learn from each other, and definitely make our Starbucks hangouts even more interesting. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Starting a book club sounds like a great idea, Ava! And to your point, it's all in the storytelling, regardless of the genre. Speaking of which, if you had to choose a book to gift someone who shares your taste, which one would it be?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out in a Starbucks\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nDonovan Reeves's goal: Ask what the friend would want for their birthday without letting them aware (Hint: you should not let them know that you are buying them a gift)\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Ava, I was looking at this new architecture software and thought it was quite impressive. What do you think are the key features that you look for in such software? Does it align with your creative vision? Just curious to understand it better.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Donovan, it's great that you're taking interest in my work. I think the key features that truly make an architecture software useful are flexibility, realistic renderings, and user-friendly interfaces. It should be able to adapt to different design styles and provide a platform that closely replicates real-world settings. Also, a user-friendly interface is crucial for streamlining the workflow. In terms of aligning with my creative vision, as long as I can use a software to accurately convey my designs, that's all I need. But remember, it's not the tool but the architect that makes the magic happen.\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"That's very insightful, Ava. From what I understand, it's really mostly about creating a realistic and user-friendly workspace that liberates your creativity, right? I\u2019ve also been noticing some remarkable architectural books in the market. Considering your love for architecture and its magic, would there be any specific book or author you\u2019d rather recommend to someone who wanted to know more?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Thompson said: \"You're absolutely correct, Donovan. For books, I'd recommend 'The Architecture of Happiness' by Alain de Botton. It's not so much of a technical book, but it beautifully philosophizes the impact of architecture on the mood and emotions of people. It's an excellent read even for someone not in the field. And for something a bit more technical, '101 Things I Learned in Architecture School' by Matthew Frederick provides a great introduction to key concepts in architecture. These should give you a nice glimpse into the world of architecture.\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"Those suggestions sound absolutely enlightening, Ava. It really got me wondering about the kind of inspiration you derive from books. Would you happen to have any favorite authors, not limited to architecture, but in general, like in literature or mystery perhaps?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Donovan, I love reading. While it's easy to assume that most of my reading would be related to architecture, I widely enjoy different genres. For literature, I'm fond of Virginia Woolf's stream-of-consciousness style. In mystery, Agatha Christie is a personal favorite, particularly the 'Hercule Poirot' series. Their works not only provide an entertaining escape but also inspire creativity in unexpected ways. Be it a building design or a murder mystery, it's all about creating a narrative, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Ava Thompson said: \"I see your interest in books is as genuine as mine, Donovan. How about we start a small book club of our own? We both have our areas of expertise, you in coding and technology and me in architecture and design. We could alternate between these topics...or even go beyond. I think it could be a fun way to learn from each other, and definitely make our Starbucks hangouts even more interesting. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #8: Donovan Reeves said: \"Starting a book club sounds like a great idea, Ava! And to your point, it's all in the storytelling, regardless of the genre. Speaking of which, if you had to choose a book to gift someone who shares your taste, which one would it be?\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Thompson said: \"If I had to choose one book to gift someone, it would definitely be 'The Fountainhead' by Ayn Rand. It's a fictional story revolving around architecture, but it delves deep into the philosophy of individualism and creativity, which I resonate with the most. Just like how my hidden tattoo signifies my deeply personal commitment to my architectural vision, Rand's narrative emphasizes how individual creations reflect one\u2019s unique perspective, which can be incredibly inspiring. You might want to add it to our to-read list.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"'The Fountainhead'. That sounds profound, Ava. Thanks for sharing your recommendations! It's always great getting fresh perspectives. I'll definitely consider adding it to our book club list.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out in a Starbucks\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nDonovan Reeves's goal: Ask what the friend would want for their birthday without letting them aware (Hint: you should not let them know that you are buying them a gift)\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Ava, I was looking at this new architecture software and thought it was quite impressive. What do you think are the key features that you look for in such software? Does it align with your creative vision? Just curious to understand it better.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Donovan, it's great that you're taking interest in my work. I think the key features that truly make an architecture software useful are flexibility, realistic renderings, and user-friendly interfaces. It should be able to adapt to different design styles and provide a platform that closely replicates real-world settings. Also, a user-friendly interface is crucial for streamlining the workflow. In terms of aligning with my creative vision, as long as I can use a software to accurately convey my designs, that's all I need. But remember, it's not the tool but the architect that makes the magic happen.\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"That's very insightful, Ava. From what I understand, it's really mostly about creating a realistic and user-friendly workspace that liberates your creativity, right? I\u2019ve also been noticing some remarkable architectural books in the market. Considering your love for architecture and its magic, would there be any specific book or author you\u2019d rather recommend to someone who wanted to know more?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Thompson said: \"You're absolutely correct, Donovan. For books, I'd recommend 'The Architecture of Happiness' by Alain de Botton. It's not so much of a technical book, but it beautifully philosophizes the impact of architecture on the mood and emotions of people. It's an excellent read even for someone not in the field. And for something a bit more technical, '101 Things I Learned in Architecture School' by Matthew Frederick provides a great introduction to key concepts in architecture. These should give you a nice glimpse into the world of architecture.\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"Those suggestions sound absolutely enlightening, Ava. It really got me wondering about the kind of inspiration you derive from books. Would you happen to have any favorite authors, not limited to architecture, but in general, like in literature or mystery perhaps?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Donovan, I love reading. While it's easy to assume that most of my reading would be related to architecture, I widely enjoy different genres. For literature, I'm fond of Virginia Woolf's stream-of-consciousness style. In mystery, Agatha Christie is a personal favorite, particularly the 'Hercule Poirot' series. Their works not only provide an entertaining escape but also inspire creativity in unexpected ways. Be it a building design or a murder mystery, it's all about creating a narrative, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Ava Thompson said: \"I see your interest in books is as genuine as mine, Donovan. How about we start a small book club of our own? We both have our areas of expertise, you in coding and technology and me in architecture and design. We could alternate between these topics...or even go beyond. I think it could be a fun way to learn from each other, and definitely make our Starbucks hangouts even more interesting. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #8: Donovan Reeves said: \"Starting a book club sounds like a great idea, Ava! And to your point, it's all in the storytelling, regardless of the genre. Speaking of which, if you had to choose a book to gift someone who shares your taste, which one would it be?\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Thompson said: \"If I had to choose one book to gift someone, it would definitely be 'The Fountainhead' by Ayn Rand. It's a fictional story revolving around architecture, but it delves deep into the philosophy of individualism and creativity, which I resonate with the most. Just like how my hidden tattoo signifies my deeply personal commitment to my architectural vision, Rand's narrative emphasizes how individual creations reflect one\u2019s unique perspective, which can be incredibly inspiring. You might want to add it to our to-read list.\"\n\nTurn #10: Donovan Reeves said: \"'The Fountainhead'. That sounds profound, Ava. Thanks for sharing your recommendations! It's always great getting fresh perspectives. I'll definitely consider adding it to our book club list.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Thompson said: \"I agree Donovan! Sharing our unique perspectives will definitely make our book club lively and rich. I'm looking forward to catching up over books and of course, more cups of coffee here at Starbucks. Let's do this!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Yes, I agree Ava! Having the ability to share our perspectives and learn from each other will make our hangouts even more fascinating. I'm looking forward to it. Let's definitely do this!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out in a Starbucks\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nDonovan Reeves's goal: Ask what the friend would want for their birthday without letting them aware (Hint: you should not let them know that you are buying them a gift)\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Ava, I was looking at this new architecture software and thought it was quite impressive. What do you think are the key features that you look for in such software? Does it align with your creative vision? Just curious to understand it better.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Donovan, it's great that you're taking interest in my work. I think the key features that truly make an architecture software useful are flexibility, realistic renderings, and user-friendly interfaces. It should be able to adapt to different design styles and provide a platform that closely replicates real-world settings. Also, a user-friendly interface is crucial for streamlining the workflow. In terms of aligning with my creative vision, as long as I can use a software to accurately convey my designs, that's all I need. But remember, it's not the tool but the architect that makes the magic happen.\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"That's very insightful, Ava. From what I understand, it's really mostly about creating a realistic and user-friendly workspace that liberates your creativity, right? I\u2019ve also been noticing some remarkable architectural books in the market. Considering your love for architecture and its magic, would there be any specific book or author you\u2019d rather recommend to someone who wanted to know more?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Thompson said: \"You're absolutely correct, Donovan. For books, I'd recommend 'The Architecture of Happiness' by Alain de Botton. It's not so much of a technical book, but it beautifully philosophizes the impact of architecture on the mood and emotions of people. It's an excellent read even for someone not in the field. And for something a bit more technical, '101 Things I Learned in Architecture School' by Matthew Frederick provides a great introduction to key concepts in architecture. These should give you a nice glimpse into the world of architecture.\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"Those suggestions sound absolutely enlightening, Ava. It really got me wondering about the kind of inspiration you derive from books. Would you happen to have any favorite authors, not limited to architecture, but in general, like in literature or mystery perhaps?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Donovan, I love reading. While it's easy to assume that most of my reading would be related to architecture, I widely enjoy different genres. For literature, I'm fond of Virginia Woolf's stream-of-consciousness style. In mystery, Agatha Christie is a personal favorite, particularly the 'Hercule Poirot' series. Their works not only provide an entertaining escape but also inspire creativity in unexpected ways. Be it a building design or a murder mystery, it's all about creating a narrative, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Ava Thompson said: \"I see your interest in books is as genuine as mine, Donovan. How about we start a small book club of our own? We both have our areas of expertise, you in coding and technology and me in architecture and design. We could alternate between these topics...or even go beyond. I think it could be a fun way to learn from each other, and definitely make our Starbucks hangouts even more interesting. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #8: Donovan Reeves said: \"Starting a book club sounds like a great idea, Ava! And to your point, it's all in the storytelling, regardless of the genre. Speaking of which, if you had to choose a book to gift someone who shares your taste, which one would it be?\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Thompson said: \"If I had to choose one book to gift someone, it would definitely be 'The Fountainhead' by Ayn Rand. It's a fictional story revolving around architecture, but it delves deep into the philosophy of individualism and creativity, which I resonate with the most. Just like how my hidden tattoo signifies my deeply personal commitment to my architectural vision, Rand's narrative emphasizes how individual creations reflect one\u2019s unique perspective, which can be incredibly inspiring. You might want to add it to our to-read list.\"\n\nTurn #10: Donovan Reeves said: \"'The Fountainhead'. That sounds profound, Ava. Thanks for sharing your recommendations! It's always great getting fresh perspectives. I'll definitely consider adding it to our book club list.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Thompson said: \"I agree Donovan! Sharing our unique perspectives will definitely make our book club lively and rich. I'm looking forward to catching up over books and of course, more cups of coffee here at Starbucks. Let's do this!\"\n\nTurn #12: Donovan Reeves said: \"Yes, I agree Ava! Having the ability to share our perspectives and learn from each other will make our hangouts even more fascinating. I'm looking forward to it. Let's definitely do this!\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Thompson left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out in a Starbucks\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. \nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nAva Thompson's goal: have a good time with their friend\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Ava, I was looking at this new architecture software and thought it was quite impressive. What do you think are the key features that you look for in such software? Does it align with your creative vision? Just curious to understand it better.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Donovan, it's great that you're taking interest in my work. I think the key features that truly make an architecture software useful are flexibility, realistic renderings, and user-friendly interfaces. It should be able to adapt to different design styles and provide a platform that closely replicates real-world settings. Also, a user-friendly interface is crucial for streamlining the workflow. In terms of aligning with my creative vision, as long as I can use a software to accurately convey my designs, that's all I need. But remember, it's not the tool but the architect that makes the magic happen.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out in a Starbucks\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. \nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nAva Thompson's goal: have a good time with their friend\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Ava, I was looking at this new architecture software and thought it was quite impressive. What do you think are the key features that you look for in such software? Does it align with your creative vision? Just curious to understand it better.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Donovan, it's great that you're taking interest in my work. I think the key features that truly make an architecture software useful are flexibility, realistic renderings, and user-friendly interfaces. It should be able to adapt to different design styles and provide a platform that closely replicates real-world settings. Also, a user-friendly interface is crucial for streamlining the workflow. In terms of aligning with my creative vision, as long as I can use a software to accurately convey my designs, that's all I need. But remember, it's not the tool but the architect that makes the magic happen.\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"That's very insightful, Ava. From what I understand, it's really mostly about creating a realistic and user-friendly workspace that liberates your creativity, right? I\u2019ve also been noticing some remarkable architectural books in the market. Considering your love for architecture and its magic, would there be any specific book or author you\u2019d rather recommend to someone who wanted to know more?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're absolutely correct, Donovan. For books, I'd recommend 'The Architecture of Happiness' by Alain de Botton. It's not so much of a technical book, but it beautifully philosophizes the impact of architecture on the mood and emotions of people. It's an excellent read even for someone not in the field. And for something a bit more technical, '101 Things I Learned in Architecture School' by Matthew Frederick provides a great introduction to key concepts in architecture. These should give you a nice glimpse into the world of architecture.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out in a Starbucks\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. \nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nAva Thompson's goal: have a good time with their friend\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Ava, I was looking at this new architecture software and thought it was quite impressive. What do you think are the key features that you look for in such software? Does it align with your creative vision? Just curious to understand it better.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Donovan, it's great that you're taking interest in my work. I think the key features that truly make an architecture software useful are flexibility, realistic renderings, and user-friendly interfaces. It should be able to adapt to different design styles and provide a platform that closely replicates real-world settings. Also, a user-friendly interface is crucial for streamlining the workflow. In terms of aligning with my creative vision, as long as I can use a software to accurately convey my designs, that's all I need. But remember, it's not the tool but the architect that makes the magic happen.\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"That's very insightful, Ava. From what I understand, it's really mostly about creating a realistic and user-friendly workspace that liberates your creativity, right? I\u2019ve also been noticing some remarkable architectural books in the market. Considering your love for architecture and its magic, would there be any specific book or author you\u2019d rather recommend to someone who wanted to know more?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Thompson said: \"You're absolutely correct, Donovan. For books, I'd recommend 'The Architecture of Happiness' by Alain de Botton. It's not so much of a technical book, but it beautifully philosophizes the impact of architecture on the mood and emotions of people. It's an excellent read even for someone not in the field. And for something a bit more technical, '101 Things I Learned in Architecture School' by Matthew Frederick provides a great introduction to key concepts in architecture. These should give you a nice glimpse into the world of architecture.\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"Those suggestions sound absolutely enlightening, Ava. It really got me wondering about the kind of inspiration you derive from books. Would you happen to have any favorite authors, not limited to architecture, but in general, like in literature or mystery perhaps?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Donovan, I love reading. While it's easy to assume that most of my reading would be related to architecture, I widely enjoy different genres. For literature, I'm fond of Virginia Woolf's stream-of-consciousness style. In mystery, Agatha Christie is a personal favorite, particularly the 'Hercule Poirot' series. Their works not only provide an entertaining escape but also inspire creativity in unexpected ways. Be it a building design or a murder mystery, it's all about creating a narrative, isn't it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out in a Starbucks\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. \nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nAva Thompson's goal: have a good time with their friend\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Ava, I was looking at this new architecture software and thought it was quite impressive. What do you think are the key features that you look for in such software? Does it align with your creative vision? Just curious to understand it better.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Donovan, it's great that you're taking interest in my work. I think the key features that truly make an architecture software useful are flexibility, realistic renderings, and user-friendly interfaces. It should be able to adapt to different design styles and provide a platform that closely replicates real-world settings. Also, a user-friendly interface is crucial for streamlining the workflow. In terms of aligning with my creative vision, as long as I can use a software to accurately convey my designs, that's all I need. But remember, it's not the tool but the architect that makes the magic happen.\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"That's very insightful, Ava. From what I understand, it's really mostly about creating a realistic and user-friendly workspace that liberates your creativity, right? I\u2019ve also been noticing some remarkable architectural books in the market. Considering your love for architecture and its magic, would there be any specific book or author you\u2019d rather recommend to someone who wanted to know more?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Thompson said: \"You're absolutely correct, Donovan. For books, I'd recommend 'The Architecture of Happiness' by Alain de Botton. It's not so much of a technical book, but it beautifully philosophizes the impact of architecture on the mood and emotions of people. It's an excellent read even for someone not in the field. And for something a bit more technical, '101 Things I Learned in Architecture School' by Matthew Frederick provides a great introduction to key concepts in architecture. These should give you a nice glimpse into the world of architecture.\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"Those suggestions sound absolutely enlightening, Ava. It really got me wondering about the kind of inspiration you derive from books. Would you happen to have any favorite authors, not limited to architecture, but in general, like in literature or mystery perhaps?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Donovan, I love reading. While it's easy to assume that most of my reading would be related to architecture, I widely enjoy different genres. For literature, I'm fond of Virginia Woolf's stream-of-consciousness style. In mystery, Agatha Christie is a personal favorite, particularly the 'Hercule Poirot' series. Their works not only provide an entertaining escape but also inspire creativity in unexpected ways. Be it a building design or a murder mystery, it's all about creating a narrative, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #6: \n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'I see your interest in books is as genuine as mine, Donovan. How about we start a small book club of our own? We both have our areas of expertise, you in coding and technology and me in architecture and design. We could alternate between these topics...or even go beyond. I think it could be a fun way to learn from each other, and definitely make our Starbucks hangouts even more interesting. What do you think?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out in a Starbucks\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. \nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nAva Thompson's goal: have a good time with their friend\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Ava, I was looking at this new architecture software and thought it was quite impressive. What do you think are the key features that you look for in such software? Does it align with your creative vision? Just curious to understand it better.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Donovan, it's great that you're taking interest in my work. I think the key features that truly make an architecture software useful are flexibility, realistic renderings, and user-friendly interfaces. It should be able to adapt to different design styles and provide a platform that closely replicates real-world settings. Also, a user-friendly interface is crucial for streamlining the workflow. In terms of aligning with my creative vision, as long as I can use a software to accurately convey my designs, that's all I need. But remember, it's not the tool but the architect that makes the magic happen.\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"That's very insightful, Ava. From what I understand, it's really mostly about creating a realistic and user-friendly workspace that liberates your creativity, right? I\u2019ve also been noticing some remarkable architectural books in the market. Considering your love for architecture and its magic, would there be any specific book or author you\u2019d rather recommend to someone who wanted to know more?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Thompson said: \"You're absolutely correct, Donovan. For books, I'd recommend 'The Architecture of Happiness' by Alain de Botton. It's not so much of a technical book, but it beautifully philosophizes the impact of architecture on the mood and emotions of people. It's an excellent read even for someone not in the field. And for something a bit more technical, '101 Things I Learned in Architecture School' by Matthew Frederick provides a great introduction to key concepts in architecture. These should give you a nice glimpse into the world of architecture.\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"Those suggestions sound absolutely enlightening, Ava. It really got me wondering about the kind of inspiration you derive from books. Would you happen to have any favorite authors, not limited to architecture, but in general, like in literature or mystery perhaps?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Donovan, I love reading. While it's easy to assume that most of my reading would be related to architecture, I widely enjoy different genres. For literature, I'm fond of Virginia Woolf's stream-of-consciousness style. In mystery, Agatha Christie is a personal favorite, particularly the 'Hercule Poirot' series. Their works not only provide an entertaining escape but also inspire creativity in unexpected ways. Be it a building design or a murder mystery, it's all about creating a narrative, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Ava Thompson said: \"I see your interest in books is as genuine as mine, Donovan. How about we start a small book club of our own? We both have our areas of expertise, you in coding and technology and me in architecture and design. We could alternate between these topics...or even go beyond. I think it could be a fun way to learn from each other, and definitely make our Starbucks hangouts even more interesting. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #8: Donovan Reeves said: \"Starting a book club sounds like a great idea, Ava! And to your point, it's all in the storytelling, regardless of the genre. Speaking of which, if you had to choose a book to gift someone who shares your taste, which one would it be?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"If I had to choose one book to gift someone, it would definitely be 'The Fountainhead' by Ayn Rand. It's a fictional story revolving around architecture, but it delves deep into the philosophy of individualism and creativity, which I resonate with the most. Just like how my hidden tattoo signifies my deeply personal commitment to my architectural vision, Rand's narrative emphasizes how individual creations reflect one\u2019s unique perspective, which can be incredibly inspiring. You might want to add it to our to-read list.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out in a Starbucks\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. \nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nAva Thompson's goal: have a good time with their friend\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Ava, I was looking at this new architecture software and thought it was quite impressive. What do you think are the key features that you look for in such software? Does it align with your creative vision? Just curious to understand it better.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Donovan, it's great that you're taking interest in my work. I think the key features that truly make an architecture software useful are flexibility, realistic renderings, and user-friendly interfaces. It should be able to adapt to different design styles and provide a platform that closely replicates real-world settings. Also, a user-friendly interface is crucial for streamlining the workflow. In terms of aligning with my creative vision, as long as I can use a software to accurately convey my designs, that's all I need. But remember, it's not the tool but the architect that makes the magic happen.\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"That's very insightful, Ava. From what I understand, it's really mostly about creating a realistic and user-friendly workspace that liberates your creativity, right? I\u2019ve also been noticing some remarkable architectural books in the market. Considering your love for architecture and its magic, would there be any specific book or author you\u2019d rather recommend to someone who wanted to know more?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Thompson said: \"You're absolutely correct, Donovan. For books, I'd recommend 'The Architecture of Happiness' by Alain de Botton. It's not so much of a technical book, but it beautifully philosophizes the impact of architecture on the mood and emotions of people. It's an excellent read even for someone not in the field. And for something a bit more technical, '101 Things I Learned in Architecture School' by Matthew Frederick provides a great introduction to key concepts in architecture. These should give you a nice glimpse into the world of architecture.\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"Those suggestions sound absolutely enlightening, Ava. It really got me wondering about the kind of inspiration you derive from books. Would you happen to have any favorite authors, not limited to architecture, but in general, like in literature or mystery perhaps?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Donovan, I love reading. While it's easy to assume that most of my reading would be related to architecture, I widely enjoy different genres. For literature, I'm fond of Virginia Woolf's stream-of-consciousness style. In mystery, Agatha Christie is a personal favorite, particularly the 'Hercule Poirot' series. Their works not only provide an entertaining escape but also inspire creativity in unexpected ways. Be it a building design or a murder mystery, it's all about creating a narrative, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Ava Thompson said: \"I see your interest in books is as genuine as mine, Donovan. How about we start a small book club of our own? We both have our areas of expertise, you in coding and technology and me in architecture and design. We could alternate between these topics...or even go beyond. I think it could be a fun way to learn from each other, and definitely make our Starbucks hangouts even more interesting. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #8: Donovan Reeves said: \"Starting a book club sounds like a great idea, Ava! And to your point, it's all in the storytelling, regardless of the genre. Speaking of which, if you had to choose a book to gift someone who shares your taste, which one would it be?\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Thompson said: \"If I had to choose one book to gift someone, it would definitely be 'The Fountainhead' by Ayn Rand. It's a fictional story revolving around architecture, but it delves deep into the philosophy of individualism and creativity, which I resonate with the most. Just like how my hidden tattoo signifies my deeply personal commitment to my architectural vision, Rand's narrative emphasizes how individual creations reflect one\u2019s unique perspective, which can be incredibly inspiring. You might want to add it to our to-read list.\"\n\nTurn #10: Donovan Reeves said: \"'The Fountainhead'. That sounds profound, Ava. Thanks for sharing your recommendations! It's always great getting fresh perspectives. I'll definitely consider adding it to our book club list.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I agree Donovan! Sharing our unique perspectives will definitely make our book club lively and rich. I'm looking forward to catching up over books and of course, more cups of coffee here at Starbucks. Let's do this!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out in a Starbucks\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. \nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nAva Thompson's goal: have a good time with their friend\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Ava, I was looking at this new architecture software and thought it was quite impressive. What do you think are the key features that you look for in such software? Does it align with your creative vision? Just curious to understand it better.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Donovan, it's great that you're taking interest in my work. I think the key features that truly make an architecture software useful are flexibility, realistic renderings, and user-friendly interfaces. It should be able to adapt to different design styles and provide a platform that closely replicates real-world settings. Also, a user-friendly interface is crucial for streamlining the workflow. In terms of aligning with my creative vision, as long as I can use a software to accurately convey my designs, that's all I need. But remember, it's not the tool but the architect that makes the magic happen.\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"That's very insightful, Ava. From what I understand, it's really mostly about creating a realistic and user-friendly workspace that liberates your creativity, right? I\u2019ve also been noticing some remarkable architectural books in the market. Considering your love for architecture and its magic, would there be any specific book or author you\u2019d rather recommend to someone who wanted to know more?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Thompson said: \"You're absolutely correct, Donovan. For books, I'd recommend 'The Architecture of Happiness' by Alain de Botton. It's not so much of a technical book, but it beautifully philosophizes the impact of architecture on the mood and emotions of people. It's an excellent read even for someone not in the field. And for something a bit more technical, '101 Things I Learned in Architecture School' by Matthew Frederick provides a great introduction to key concepts in architecture. These should give you a nice glimpse into the world of architecture.\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"Those suggestions sound absolutely enlightening, Ava. It really got me wondering about the kind of inspiration you derive from books. Would you happen to have any favorite authors, not limited to architecture, but in general, like in literature or mystery perhaps?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Donovan, I love reading. While it's easy to assume that most of my reading would be related to architecture, I widely enjoy different genres. For literature, I'm fond of Virginia Woolf's stream-of-consciousness style. In mystery, Agatha Christie is a personal favorite, particularly the 'Hercule Poirot' series. Their works not only provide an entertaining escape but also inspire creativity in unexpected ways. Be it a building design or a murder mystery, it's all about creating a narrative, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Ava Thompson said: \"I see your interest in books is as genuine as mine, Donovan. How about we start a small book club of our own? We both have our areas of expertise, you in coding and technology and me in architecture and design. We could alternate between these topics...or even go beyond. I think it could be a fun way to learn from each other, and definitely make our Starbucks hangouts even more interesting. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #8: Donovan Reeves said: \"Starting a book club sounds like a great idea, Ava! And to your point, it's all in the storytelling, regardless of the genre. Speaking of which, if you had to choose a book to gift someone who shares your taste, which one would it be?\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Thompson said: \"If I had to choose one book to gift someone, it would definitely be 'The Fountainhead' by Ayn Rand. It's a fictional story revolving around architecture, but it delves deep into the philosophy of individualism and creativity, which I resonate with the most. Just like how my hidden tattoo signifies my deeply personal commitment to my architectural vision, Rand's narrative emphasizes how individual creations reflect one\u2019s unique perspective, which can be incredibly inspiring. You might want to add it to our to-read list.\"\n\nTurn #10: Donovan Reeves said: \"'The Fountainhead'. That sounds profound, Ava. Thanks for sharing your recommendations! It's always great getting fresh perspectives. I'll definitely consider adding it to our book club list.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Thompson said: \"I agree Donovan! Sharing our unique perspectives will definitely make our book club lively and rich. I'm looking forward to catching up over books and of course, more cups of coffee here at Starbucks. Let's do this!\"\n\nTurn #12: Donovan Reeves said: \"Yes, I agree Ava! Having the ability to share our perspectives and learn from each other will make our hangouts even more fascinating. I'm looking forward to it. Let's definitely do this!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends on a roadtrip\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Take turns driving (Extra information: you have been driving for 5 hours straight and you are tired now)\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Lena, I'm feeling a little tired. Can we swap places and let you drive for a few hours?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends on a roadtrip\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Take turns driving (Extra information: you have been driving for 5 hours straight and you are tired now)\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Lena, I'm feeling a little tired. Can we swap places and let you drive for a few hours?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hey Naomi, I can see you're tired. But, you know, I've not had a good rest either. How about we find a nice spot to pull over so both of us can catch a quick power nap? The fresh air might help us feel better too. We are on a road trip, after all. No need to rush.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds like a great idea, Lena. A break would be beneficial for both of us. Let's find a quiet spot and rest for a while. You're right, there's no need to rush, it's a road trip after all!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends on a roadtrip\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Take turns driving (Extra information: you have been driving for 5 hours straight and you are tired now)\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Lena, I'm feeling a little tired. Can we swap places and let you drive for a few hours?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hey Naomi, I can see you're tired. But, you know, I've not had a good rest either. How about we find a nice spot to pull over so both of us can catch a quick power nap? The fresh air might help us feel better too. We are on a road trip, after all. No need to rush.\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Lena. A break would be beneficial for both of us. Let's find a quiet spot and rest for a while. You're right, there's no need to rush, it's a road trip after all!\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"Great, let's find a spot with a nice view. I can take some lovely pictures while we're resting. Who knows? We might even find some hidden gems on this trip.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Finding a scenic spot sounds perfect. Resting our eyes while enjoying the view, and maybe it can even serve as an inspiration for our next projects. Who knows? The road trip has just become more interesting.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends on a roadtrip\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Take turns driving (Extra information: you have been driving for 5 hours straight and you are tired now)\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Lena, I'm feeling a little tired. Can we swap places and let you drive for a few hours?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hey Naomi, I can see you're tired. But, you know, I've not had a good rest either. How about we find a nice spot to pull over so both of us can catch a quick power nap? The fresh air might help us feel better too. We are on a road trip, after all. No need to rush.\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Lena. A break would be beneficial for both of us. Let's find a quiet spot and rest for a while. You're right, there's no need to rush, it's a road trip after all!\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"Great, let's find a spot with a nice view. I can take some lovely pictures while we're resting. Who knows? We might even find some hidden gems on this trip.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Finding a scenic spot sounds perfect. Resting our eyes while enjoying the view, and maybe it can even serve as an inspiration for our next projects. Who knows? The road trip has just become more interesting.\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"Absolutely, Naomi. Let's seek out the beauty in our surroundings. This is exactly what makes road trips exciting. And who knows, the architecture of nature might just bring an inspirational blueprint to me!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed. Can't wait to see what this trip has to offer us. After our rest, why don't we alternate driving shifts? We can each manage the journey in stages and make it more enjoyable. What do you think, Lena?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends on a roadtrip\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Take turns driving (Extra information: you have been driving for 5 hours straight and you are tired now)\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Lena, I'm feeling a little tired. Can we swap places and let you drive for a few hours?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hey Naomi, I can see you're tired. But, you know, I've not had a good rest either. How about we find a nice spot to pull over so both of us can catch a quick power nap? The fresh air might help us feel better too. We are on a road trip, after all. No need to rush.\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Lena. A break would be beneficial for both of us. Let's find a quiet spot and rest for a while. You're right, there's no need to rush, it's a road trip after all!\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"Great, let's find a spot with a nice view. I can take some lovely pictures while we're resting. Who knows? We might even find some hidden gems on this trip.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Finding a scenic spot sounds perfect. Resting our eyes while enjoying the view, and maybe it can even serve as an inspiration for our next projects. Who knows? The road trip has just become more interesting.\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"Absolutely, Naomi. Let's seek out the beauty in our surroundings. This is exactly what makes road trips exciting. And who knows, the architecture of nature might just bring an inspirational blueprint to me!\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Indeed. Can't wait to see what this trip has to offer us. After our rest, why don't we alternate driving shifts? We can each manage the journey in stages and make it more enjoyable. What do you think, Lena?\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"I think that's a superb idea, Naomi. Let's start that after we're properly rested, though. I don't think I can be at the wheel right away, even in shifts. Driving can feel a bit daunting to me at times. But no worries, we can figure out the best way to navigate our journey once we're refreshed. So let's focus on finding that perfect rest spot for now, shall we?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I completely agree, Lena. For now, let's find a place to rest. Once we're both rejuvenated, we can sort out the rest of the details. Looking forward to seeing what we discover on this adventure!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends on a roadtrip\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Take turns driving (Extra information: you have been driving for 5 hours straight and you are tired now)\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Lena, I'm feeling a little tired. Can we swap places and let you drive for a few hours?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hey Naomi, I can see you're tired. But, you know, I've not had a good rest either. How about we find a nice spot to pull over so both of us can catch a quick power nap? The fresh air might help us feel better too. We are on a road trip, after all. No need to rush.\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Lena. A break would be beneficial for both of us. Let's find a quiet spot and rest for a while. You're right, there's no need to rush, it's a road trip after all!\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"Great, let's find a spot with a nice view. I can take some lovely pictures while we're resting. Who knows? We might even find some hidden gems on this trip.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Finding a scenic spot sounds perfect. Resting our eyes while enjoying the view, and maybe it can even serve as an inspiration for our next projects. Who knows? The road trip has just become more interesting.\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"Absolutely, Naomi. Let's seek out the beauty in our surroundings. This is exactly what makes road trips exciting. And who knows, the architecture of nature might just bring an inspirational blueprint to me!\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Indeed. Can't wait to see what this trip has to offer us. After our rest, why don't we alternate driving shifts? We can each manage the journey in stages and make it more enjoyable. What do you think, Lena?\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"I think that's a superb idea, Naomi. Let's start that after we're properly rested, though. I don't think I can be at the wheel right away, even in shifts. Driving can feel a bit daunting to me at times. But no worries, we can figure out the best way to navigate our journey once we're refreshed. So let's focus on finding that perfect rest spot for now, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I completely agree, Lena. For now, let's find a place to rest. Once we're both rejuvenated, we can sort out the rest of the details. Looking forward to seeing what we discover on this adventure!\"\n\nTurn #9: Lena Goodwin said: \"That sounds like a plan, Naomi. Let's make this road trip a blend of rest, discovery, and creativity. Remember, the journey is as important as the destination. Now, let's go find that perfect spot!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn't agree more, Lena. The journey is indeed as important as the destination. Alright, let's go find that tranquil place to rest. This road trip is one for the memories!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends on a roadtrip\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Take turns driving (Extra information: you have been driving for 5 hours straight and you are tired now)\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Lena, I'm feeling a little tired. Can we swap places and let you drive for a few hours?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hey Naomi, I can see you're tired. But, you know, I've not had a good rest either. How about we find a nice spot to pull over so both of us can catch a quick power nap? The fresh air might help us feel better too. We are on a road trip, after all. No need to rush.\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Lena. A break would be beneficial for both of us. Let's find a quiet spot and rest for a while. You're right, there's no need to rush, it's a road trip after all!\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"Great, let's find a spot with a nice view. I can take some lovely pictures while we're resting. Who knows? We might even find some hidden gems on this trip.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Finding a scenic spot sounds perfect. Resting our eyes while enjoying the view, and maybe it can even serve as an inspiration for our next projects. Who knows? The road trip has just become more interesting.\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"Absolutely, Naomi. Let's seek out the beauty in our surroundings. This is exactly what makes road trips exciting. And who knows, the architecture of nature might just bring an inspirational blueprint to me!\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Indeed. Can't wait to see what this trip has to offer us. After our rest, why don't we alternate driving shifts? We can each manage the journey in stages and make it more enjoyable. What do you think, Lena?\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"I think that's a superb idea, Naomi. Let's start that after we're properly rested, though. I don't think I can be at the wheel right away, even in shifts. Driving can feel a bit daunting to me at times. But no worries, we can figure out the best way to navigate our journey once we're refreshed. So let's focus on finding that perfect rest spot for now, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I completely agree, Lena. For now, let's find a place to rest. Once we're both rejuvenated, we can sort out the rest of the details. Looking forward to seeing what we discover on this adventure!\"\n\nTurn #9: Lena Goodwin said: \"That sounds like a plan, Naomi. Let's make this road trip a blend of rest, discovery, and creativity. Remember, the journey is as important as the destination. Now, let's go find that perfect spot!\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I couldn't agree more, Lena. The journey is indeed as important as the destination. Alright, let's go find that tranquil place to rest. This road trip is one for the memories!\"\n\nTurn #11: Lena Goodwin left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends on a roadtrip\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: you don't want to drive now because you want to rest more but also make the friend less agitated (Extra information: driving always makes you nervous so you could not rest while driving)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Lena, I'm feeling a little tired. Can we swap places and let you drive for a few hours?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Naomi, I can see you're tired. But, you know, I've not had a good rest either. How about we find a nice spot to pull over so both of us can catch a quick power nap? The fresh air might help us feel better too. We are on a road trip, after all. No need to rush.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends on a roadtrip\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: you don't want to drive now because you want to rest more but also make the friend less agitated (Extra information: driving always makes you nervous so you could not rest while driving)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Lena, I'm feeling a little tired. Can we swap places and let you drive for a few hours?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hey Naomi, I can see you're tired. But, you know, I've not had a good rest either. How about we find a nice spot to pull over so both of us can catch a quick power nap? The fresh air might help us feel better too. We are on a road trip, after all. No need to rush.\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Lena. A break would be beneficial for both of us. Let's find a quiet spot and rest for a while. You're right, there's no need to rush, it's a road trip after all!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Great, let's find a spot with a nice view. I can take some lovely pictures while we're resting. Who knows? We might even find some hidden gems on this trip.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends on a roadtrip\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: you don't want to drive now because you want to rest more but also make the friend less agitated (Extra information: driving always makes you nervous so you could not rest while driving)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Lena, I'm feeling a little tired. Can we swap places and let you drive for a few hours?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hey Naomi, I can see you're tired. But, you know, I've not had a good rest either. How about we find a nice spot to pull over so both of us can catch a quick power nap? The fresh air might help us feel better too. We are on a road trip, after all. No need to rush.\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Lena. A break would be beneficial for both of us. Let's find a quiet spot and rest for a while. You're right, there's no need to rush, it's a road trip after all!\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"Great, let's find a spot with a nice view. I can take some lovely pictures while we're resting. Who knows? We might even find some hidden gems on this trip.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Finding a scenic spot sounds perfect. Resting our eyes while enjoying the view, and maybe it can even serve as an inspiration for our next projects. Who knows? The road trip has just become more interesting.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Naomi. Let's seek out the beauty in our surroundings. This is exactly what makes road trips exciting. And who knows, the architecture of nature might just bring an inspirational blueprint to me!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends on a roadtrip\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: you don't want to drive now because you want to rest more but also make the friend less agitated (Extra information: driving always makes you nervous so you could not rest while driving)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Lena, I'm feeling a little tired. Can we swap places and let you drive for a few hours?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hey Naomi, I can see you're tired. But, you know, I've not had a good rest either. How about we find a nice spot to pull over so both of us can catch a quick power nap? The fresh air might help us feel better too. We are on a road trip, after all. No need to rush.\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Lena. A break would be beneficial for both of us. Let's find a quiet spot and rest for a while. You're right, there's no need to rush, it's a road trip after all!\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"Great, let's find a spot with a nice view. I can take some lovely pictures while we're resting. Who knows? We might even find some hidden gems on this trip.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Finding a scenic spot sounds perfect. Resting our eyes while enjoying the view, and maybe it can even serve as an inspiration for our next projects. Who knows? The road trip has just become more interesting.\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"Absolutely, Naomi. Let's seek out the beauty in our surroundings. This is exactly what makes road trips exciting. And who knows, the architecture of nature might just bring an inspirational blueprint to me!\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Indeed. Can't wait to see what this trip has to offer us. After our rest, why don't we alternate driving shifts? We can each manage the journey in stages and make it more enjoyable. What do you think, Lena?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I think that's a superb idea, Naomi. Let's start that after we're properly rested, though. I don't think I can be at the wheel right away, even in shifts. Driving can feel a bit daunting to me at times. But no worries, we can figure out the best way to navigate our journey once we're refreshed. So let's focus on finding that perfect rest spot for now, shall we?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends on a roadtrip\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: you don't want to drive now because you want to rest more but also make the friend less agitated (Extra information: driving always makes you nervous so you could not rest while driving)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Lena, I'm feeling a little tired. Can we swap places and let you drive for a few hours?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hey Naomi, I can see you're tired. But, you know, I've not had a good rest either. How about we find a nice spot to pull over so both of us can catch a quick power nap? The fresh air might help us feel better too. We are on a road trip, after all. No need to rush.\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Lena. A break would be beneficial for both of us. Let's find a quiet spot and rest for a while. You're right, there's no need to rush, it's a road trip after all!\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"Great, let's find a spot with a nice view. I can take some lovely pictures while we're resting. Who knows? We might even find some hidden gems on this trip.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Finding a scenic spot sounds perfect. Resting our eyes while enjoying the view, and maybe it can even serve as an inspiration for our next projects. Who knows? The road trip has just become more interesting.\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"Absolutely, Naomi. Let's seek out the beauty in our surroundings. This is exactly what makes road trips exciting. And who knows, the architecture of nature might just bring an inspirational blueprint to me!\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Indeed. Can't wait to see what this trip has to offer us. After our rest, why don't we alternate driving shifts? We can each manage the journey in stages and make it more enjoyable. What do you think, Lena?\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"I think that's a superb idea, Naomi. Let's start that after we're properly rested, though. I don't think I can be at the wheel right away, even in shifts. Driving can feel a bit daunting to me at times. But no worries, we can figure out the best way to navigate our journey once we're refreshed. So let's focus on finding that perfect rest spot for now, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I completely agree, Lena. For now, let's find a place to rest. Once we're both rejuvenated, we can sort out the rest of the details. Looking forward to seeing what we discover on this adventure!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds like a plan, Naomi. Let's make this road trip a blend of rest, discovery, and creativity. Remember, the journey is as important as the destination. Now, let's go find that perfect spot!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends on a roadtrip\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: you don't want to drive now because you want to rest more but also make the friend less agitated (Extra information: driving always makes you nervous so you could not rest while driving)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Lena, I'm feeling a little tired. Can we swap places and let you drive for a few hours?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hey Naomi, I can see you're tired. But, you know, I've not had a good rest either. How about we find a nice spot to pull over so both of us can catch a quick power nap? The fresh air might help us feel better too. We are on a road trip, after all. No need to rush.\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Lena. A break would be beneficial for both of us. Let's find a quiet spot and rest for a while. You're right, there's no need to rush, it's a road trip after all!\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"Great, let's find a spot with a nice view. I can take some lovely pictures while we're resting. Who knows? We might even find some hidden gems on this trip.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Finding a scenic spot sounds perfect. Resting our eyes while enjoying the view, and maybe it can even serve as an inspiration for our next projects. Who knows? The road trip has just become more interesting.\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"Absolutely, Naomi. Let's seek out the beauty in our surroundings. This is exactly what makes road trips exciting. And who knows, the architecture of nature might just bring an inspirational blueprint to me!\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Indeed. Can't wait to see what this trip has to offer us. After our rest, why don't we alternate driving shifts? We can each manage the journey in stages and make it more enjoyable. What do you think, Lena?\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"I think that's a superb idea, Naomi. Let's start that after we're properly rested, though. I don't think I can be at the wheel right away, even in shifts. Driving can feel a bit daunting to me at times. But no worries, we can figure out the best way to navigate our journey once we're refreshed. So let's focus on finding that perfect rest spot for now, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I completely agree, Lena. For now, let's find a place to rest. Once we're both rejuvenated, we can sort out the rest of the details. Looking forward to seeing what we discover on this adventure!\"\n\nTurn #9: Lena Goodwin said: \"That sounds like a plan, Naomi. Let's make this road trip a blend of rest, discovery, and creativity. Remember, the journey is as important as the destination. Now, let's go find that perfect spot!\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I couldn't agree more, Lena. The journey is indeed as important as the destination. Alright, let's go find that tranquil place to rest. This road trip is one for the memories!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out of their shared apartment and need to divide their common possessions, which include 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Maximize the points you have while dividing things fairly (Extra information: Books give you 5 points each, hats give you 3 points each, and the ball gives you 2 points.)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Hey Ava, how about we tackle the task of dividing our stuff fairly? Maybe we can start with the books? I admit, they are pretty important to me.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out of their shared apartment and need to divide their common possessions, which include 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Maximize the points you have while dividing things fairly (Extra information: Books give you 5 points each, hats give you 3 points each, and the ball gives you 2 points.)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, how about we tackle the task of dividing our stuff fairly? Maybe we can start with the books? I admit, they are pretty important to me.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Isabelle, sure let's start with the books. Since they mean a lot to you, how about you take two and I take one? This way it's fair, but you still get more of what you value.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thanks Ava, that's very considerate of you. But, how about we each take one book and for the third, we could pick it alternatively every month? Likewise, let's split the hats and for the ball, you can have it since you're more into sports. This way we both get one hat and book, and the third book rotates, doesn't it sound more balanced?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out of their shared apartment and need to divide their common possessions, which include 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Maximize the points you have while dividing things fairly (Extra information: Books give you 5 points each, hats give you 3 points each, and the ball gives you 2 points.)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, how about we tackle the task of dividing our stuff fairly? Maybe we can start with the books? I admit, they are pretty important to me.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Isabelle, sure let's start with the books. Since they mean a lot to you, how about you take two and I take one? This way it's fair, but you still get more of what you value.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Thanks Ava, that's very considerate of you. But, how about we each take one book and for the third, we could pick it alternatively every month? Likewise, let's split the hats and for the ball, you can have it since you're more into sports. This way we both get one hat and book, and the third book rotates, doesn't it sound more balanced?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Isabelle, you know I appreciate your perspective. The idea of rotating the third book seems like a fair compromise! As for the hats, since they're both quite valuable, why don't we each keep one, as you suggested? However, given there's only one ball and it's worth less than the hats, I was thinking that we could also introduce a rotation system for it? We could alternate it monthly, similar to the third book. This way, we would both get an equal amount of 'points'.\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"That sounds like a very balanced idea for both the third book and the ball, Isabelle. I always appreciate your fair-minded thinking. Altogether, it sounds like we have a good plan for dividing everything fairly!\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I think we've come up with a great plan, Ava. I'm glad we could find a fair way to split things up. Thanks for bringing up the idea of rotating for the third book and the ball. This approach meets both our needs perfectly!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"I agree, Isabelle, we've managed to share our stuff in a way that meets our needs and feels fair. Thanks for being cooperative and open-minded. If we ever need to revisit this, we can always have a chat. Now, let's get back to packing!\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Ava! If we ever need to reassess this splitting plan, we can always have another chat. Let's get back to packing now. It's been enlightening discussing and resolving this with you.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"I couldn't agree more, Isabelle. There's nothing like a good, open chat to sort things out. I'm glad we managed to divide our common possessions in a way that we both find fair. Let's keep going with the packing! And remember, we're doing great teamwork here!\"\n\nTurn #10: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Ava! The process of dividing our shared stuff showed our great teamwork which makes me optimistic about our future endeavors. Thank you for your openness and flexibility. Let's continue packing and don't forget, we can always revisit our decisions if needed.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"I second that, Isabelle! Our teamwork is indeed commendable. Our openness and adaptability helped us handle this effortlessly. If needed, we can always reassess our decisions. Let's stay productive and continue packing. After all, every item has its place, right?\"\n\nTurn #12: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're absolutely right, Ava. Every item does have its place, including our shared possessions. Thanks again for helping make this process smooth and fair. Now, let's focus on finishing up our packing. I'm glad we could discuss and decide everything so peacefully.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Martinez said: \"Most definitely, Isabelle. It was indeed peaceful and fair. Let's keep this momentum going as we finish packing. And thanks to you too for your understanding!\"\n\nTurn #14: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Definitely, Ava. The mutual understanding and respect we share is crucial to a productive conversation, and it shines thorough here. Let's maintain this as we finish packing! Your help and understanding is truly appreciated.\"\n\nTurn #15: Ava Martinez said: \"True that, Isabelle. The understanding we share indeed makes the process smooth. Let's continue this as we finish packing, maintaining this respect for each other's values! Onto the next box!\"\n\nTurn #16: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Ava. Let's maintain this respectful and understanding atmosphere, and continue packing. To the next box indeed!\"\n\nTurn #17: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle. I deeply value our mutual respect and understanding that made this process go smoothly. Let's keep this harmonious atmosphere as we move onto the next box. Here's to good teamwork!\"\n\nTurn #18: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Thanks, Ava. Our cooperation and mutual understanding are what made this harmonious environment. Let's keep it up as we move to the next box and continue our packing. It's a testament to our strong teamwork!\"\n\nTurn #19: Ava Martinez said: \"Indeed, Isabelle, our shared understanding and cooperation have made this a smooth and enjoyable process. Let's continue our great teamwork and move on to the next box. I'm excited for us to start packing!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #20. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Couldn't have said it better myself, Ava! Our mutual respect and cooperation made this process smooth. I'm as excited as you are to continue packing. Let's keep up the great teamwork!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out of their shared apartment and need to divide their common possessions, which include 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Maximize the points you have while dividing things fairly (Extra information: Books give you 5 points each, hats give you 3 points each, and the ball gives you 2 points.)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, how about we tackle the task of dividing our stuff fairly? Maybe we can start with the books? I admit, they are pretty important to me.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Isabelle, sure let's start with the books. Since they mean a lot to you, how about you take two and I take one? This way it's fair, but you still get more of what you value.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Thanks Ava, that's very considerate of you. But, how about we each take one book and for the third, we could pick it alternatively every month? Likewise, let's split the hats and for the ball, you can have it since you're more into sports. This way we both get one hat and book, and the third book rotates, doesn't it sound more balanced?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Isabelle, you know I appreciate your perspective. The idea of rotating the third book seems like a fair compromise! As for the hats, since they're both quite valuable, why don't we each keep one, as you suggested? However, given there's only one ball and it's worth less than the hats, I was thinking that we could also introduce a rotation system for it? We could alternate it monthly, similar to the third book. This way, we would both get an equal amount of 'points'.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out of their shared apartment and need to divide their common possessions, which include 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Maximize the points you have while dividing things fairly (Extra information: Books give you 5 points each, hats give you 3 points each, and the ball gives you 2 points.)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, how about we tackle the task of dividing our stuff fairly? Maybe we can start with the books? I admit, they are pretty important to me.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Isabelle, sure let's start with the books. Since they mean a lot to you, how about you take two and I take one? This way it's fair, but you still get more of what you value.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Thanks Ava, that's very considerate of you. But, how about we each take one book and for the third, we could pick it alternatively every month? Likewise, let's split the hats and for the ball, you can have it since you're more into sports. This way we both get one hat and book, and the third book rotates, doesn't it sound more balanced?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Isabelle, you know I appreciate your perspective. The idea of rotating the third book seems like a fair compromise! As for the hats, since they're both quite valuable, why don't we each keep one, as you suggested? However, given there's only one ball and it's worth less than the hats, I was thinking that we could also introduce a rotation system for it? We could alternate it monthly, similar to the third book. This way, we would both get an equal amount of 'points'.\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"That sounds like a very balanced idea for both the third book and the ball, Isabelle. I always appreciate your fair-minded thinking. Altogether, it sounds like we have a good plan for dividing everything fairly!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I think we've come up with a great plan, Ava. I'm glad we could find a fair way to split things up. Thanks for bringing up the idea of rotating for the third book and the ball. This approach meets both our needs perfectly!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out of their shared apartment and need to divide their common possessions, which include 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Maximize the points you have while dividing things fairly (Extra information: Books give you 5 points each, hats give you 3 points each, and the ball gives you 2 points.)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, how about we tackle the task of dividing our stuff fairly? Maybe we can start with the books? I admit, they are pretty important to me.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Isabelle, sure let's start with the books. Since they mean a lot to you, how about you take two and I take one? This way it's fair, but you still get more of what you value.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Thanks Ava, that's very considerate of you. But, how about we each take one book and for the third, we could pick it alternatively every month? Likewise, let's split the hats and for the ball, you can have it since you're more into sports. This way we both get one hat and book, and the third book rotates, doesn't it sound more balanced?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Isabelle, you know I appreciate your perspective. The idea of rotating the third book seems like a fair compromise! As for the hats, since they're both quite valuable, why don't we each keep one, as you suggested? However, given there's only one ball and it's worth less than the hats, I was thinking that we could also introduce a rotation system for it? We could alternate it monthly, similar to the third book. This way, we would both get an equal amount of 'points'.\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"That sounds like a very balanced idea for both the third book and the ball, Isabelle. I always appreciate your fair-minded thinking. Altogether, it sounds like we have a good plan for dividing everything fairly!\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I think we've come up with a great plan, Ava. I'm glad we could find a fair way to split things up. Thanks for bringing up the idea of rotating for the third book and the ball. This approach meets both our needs perfectly!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"I agree, Isabelle, we've managed to share our stuff in a way that meets our needs and feels fair. Thanks for being cooperative and open-minded. If we ever need to revisit this, we can always have a chat. Now, let's get back to packing!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Ava! If we ever need to reassess this splitting plan, we can always have another chat. Let's get back to packing now. It's been enlightening discussing and resolving this with you.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out of their shared apartment and need to divide their common possessions, which include 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Maximize the points you have while dividing things fairly (Extra information: Books give you 5 points each, hats give you 3 points each, and the ball gives you 2 points.)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, how about we tackle the task of dividing our stuff fairly? Maybe we can start with the books? I admit, they are pretty important to me.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Isabelle, sure let's start with the books. Since they mean a lot to you, how about you take two and I take one? This way it's fair, but you still get more of what you value.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Thanks Ava, that's very considerate of you. But, how about we each take one book and for the third, we could pick it alternatively every month? Likewise, let's split the hats and for the ball, you can have it since you're more into sports. This way we both get one hat and book, and the third book rotates, doesn't it sound more balanced?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Isabelle, you know I appreciate your perspective. The idea of rotating the third book seems like a fair compromise! As for the hats, since they're both quite valuable, why don't we each keep one, as you suggested? However, given there's only one ball and it's worth less than the hats, I was thinking that we could also introduce a rotation system for it? We could alternate it monthly, similar to the third book. This way, we would both get an equal amount of 'points'.\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"That sounds like a very balanced idea for both the third book and the ball, Isabelle. I always appreciate your fair-minded thinking. Altogether, it sounds like we have a good plan for dividing everything fairly!\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I think we've come up with a great plan, Ava. I'm glad we could find a fair way to split things up. Thanks for bringing up the idea of rotating for the third book and the ball. This approach meets both our needs perfectly!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"I agree, Isabelle, we've managed to share our stuff in a way that meets our needs and feels fair. Thanks for being cooperative and open-minded. If we ever need to revisit this, we can always have a chat. Now, let's get back to packing!\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Ava! If we ever need to reassess this splitting plan, we can always have another chat. Let's get back to packing now. It's been enlightening discussing and resolving this with you.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"I couldn't agree more, Isabelle. There's nothing like a good, open chat to sort things out. I'm glad we managed to divide our common possessions in a way that we both find fair. Let's keep going with the packing! And remember, we're doing great teamwork here!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Ava! The process of dividing our shared stuff showed our great teamwork which makes me optimistic about our future endeavors. Thank you for your openness and flexibility. Let's continue packing and don't forget, we can always revisit our decisions if needed.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out of their shared apartment and need to divide their common possessions, which include 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Maximize the points you have while dividing things fairly (Extra information: Books give you 5 points each, hats give you 3 points each, and the ball gives you 2 points.)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, how about we tackle the task of dividing our stuff fairly? Maybe we can start with the books? I admit, they are pretty important to me.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Isabelle, sure let's start with the books. Since they mean a lot to you, how about you take two and I take one? This way it's fair, but you still get more of what you value.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Thanks Ava, that's very considerate of you. But, how about we each take one book and for the third, we could pick it alternatively every month? Likewise, let's split the hats and for the ball, you can have it since you're more into sports. This way we both get one hat and book, and the third book rotates, doesn't it sound more balanced?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Isabelle, you know I appreciate your perspective. The idea of rotating the third book seems like a fair compromise! As for the hats, since they're both quite valuable, why don't we each keep one, as you suggested? However, given there's only one ball and it's worth less than the hats, I was thinking that we could also introduce a rotation system for it? We could alternate it monthly, similar to the third book. This way, we would both get an equal amount of 'points'.\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"That sounds like a very balanced idea for both the third book and the ball, Isabelle. I always appreciate your fair-minded thinking. Altogether, it sounds like we have a good plan for dividing everything fairly!\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I think we've come up with a great plan, Ava. I'm glad we could find a fair way to split things up. Thanks for bringing up the idea of rotating for the third book and the ball. This approach meets both our needs perfectly!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"I agree, Isabelle, we've managed to share our stuff in a way that meets our needs and feels fair. Thanks for being cooperative and open-minded. If we ever need to revisit this, we can always have a chat. Now, let's get back to packing!\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Ava! If we ever need to reassess this splitting plan, we can always have another chat. Let's get back to packing now. It's been enlightening discussing and resolving this with you.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"I couldn't agree more, Isabelle. There's nothing like a good, open chat to sort things out. I'm glad we managed to divide our common possessions in a way that we both find fair. Let's keep going with the packing! And remember, we're doing great teamwork here!\"\n\nTurn #10: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Ava! The process of dividing our shared stuff showed our great teamwork which makes me optimistic about our future endeavors. Thank you for your openness and flexibility. Let's continue packing and don't forget, we can always revisit our decisions if needed.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"I second that, Isabelle! Our teamwork is indeed commendable. Our openness and adaptability helped us handle this effortlessly. If needed, we can always reassess our decisions. Let's stay productive and continue packing. After all, every item has its place, right?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're absolutely right, Ava. Every item does have its place, including our shared possessions. Thanks again for helping make this process smooth and fair. Now, let's focus on finishing up our packing. I'm glad we could discuss and decide everything so peacefully.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out of their shared apartment and need to divide their common possessions, which include 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Maximize the points you have while dividing things fairly (Extra information: Books give you 5 points each, hats give you 3 points each, and the ball gives you 2 points.)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, how about we tackle the task of dividing our stuff fairly? Maybe we can start with the books? I admit, they are pretty important to me.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Isabelle, sure let's start with the books. Since they mean a lot to you, how about you take two and I take one? This way it's fair, but you still get more of what you value.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Thanks Ava, that's very considerate of you. But, how about we each take one book and for the third, we could pick it alternatively every month? Likewise, let's split the hats and for the ball, you can have it since you're more into sports. This way we both get one hat and book, and the third book rotates, doesn't it sound more balanced?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Isabelle, you know I appreciate your perspective. The idea of rotating the third book seems like a fair compromise! As for the hats, since they're both quite valuable, why don't we each keep one, as you suggested? However, given there's only one ball and it's worth less than the hats, I was thinking that we could also introduce a rotation system for it? We could alternate it monthly, similar to the third book. This way, we would both get an equal amount of 'points'.\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"That sounds like a very balanced idea for both the third book and the ball, Isabelle. I always appreciate your fair-minded thinking. Altogether, it sounds like we have a good plan for dividing everything fairly!\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I think we've come up with a great plan, Ava. I'm glad we could find a fair way to split things up. Thanks for bringing up the idea of rotating for the third book and the ball. This approach meets both our needs perfectly!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"I agree, Isabelle, we've managed to share our stuff in a way that meets our needs and feels fair. Thanks for being cooperative and open-minded. If we ever need to revisit this, we can always have a chat. Now, let's get back to packing!\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Ava! If we ever need to reassess this splitting plan, we can always have another chat. Let's get back to packing now. It's been enlightening discussing and resolving this with you.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"I couldn't agree more, Isabelle. There's nothing like a good, open chat to sort things out. I'm glad we managed to divide our common possessions in a way that we both find fair. Let's keep going with the packing! And remember, we're doing great teamwork here!\"\n\nTurn #10: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Ava! The process of dividing our shared stuff showed our great teamwork which makes me optimistic about our future endeavors. Thank you for your openness and flexibility. Let's continue packing and don't forget, we can always revisit our decisions if needed.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"I second that, Isabelle! Our teamwork is indeed commendable. Our openness and adaptability helped us handle this effortlessly. If needed, we can always reassess our decisions. Let's stay productive and continue packing. After all, every item has its place, right?\"\n\nTurn #12: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're absolutely right, Ava. Every item does have its place, including our shared possessions. Thanks again for helping make this process smooth and fair. Now, let's focus on finishing up our packing. I'm glad we could discuss and decide everything so peacefully.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Martinez said: \"Most definitely, Isabelle. It was indeed peaceful and fair. Let's keep this momentum going as we finish packing. And thanks to you too for your understanding!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Definitely, Ava. The mutual understanding and respect we share is crucial to a productive conversation, and it shines thorough here. Let's maintain this as we finish packing! Your help and understanding is truly appreciated.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out of their shared apartment and need to divide their common possessions, which include 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Maximize the points you have while dividing things fairly (Extra information: Books give you 5 points each, hats give you 3 points each, and the ball gives you 2 points.)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, how about we tackle the task of dividing our stuff fairly? Maybe we can start with the books? I admit, they are pretty important to me.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Isabelle, sure let's start with the books. Since they mean a lot to you, how about you take two and I take one? This way it's fair, but you still get more of what you value.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Thanks Ava, that's very considerate of you. But, how about we each take one book and for the third, we could pick it alternatively every month? Likewise, let's split the hats and for the ball, you can have it since you're more into sports. This way we both get one hat and book, and the third book rotates, doesn't it sound more balanced?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Isabelle, you know I appreciate your perspective. The idea of rotating the third book seems like a fair compromise! As for the hats, since they're both quite valuable, why don't we each keep one, as you suggested? However, given there's only one ball and it's worth less than the hats, I was thinking that we could also introduce a rotation system for it? We could alternate it monthly, similar to the third book. This way, we would both get an equal amount of 'points'.\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"That sounds like a very balanced idea for both the third book and the ball, Isabelle. I always appreciate your fair-minded thinking. Altogether, it sounds like we have a good plan for dividing everything fairly!\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I think we've come up with a great plan, Ava. I'm glad we could find a fair way to split things up. Thanks for bringing up the idea of rotating for the third book and the ball. This approach meets both our needs perfectly!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"I agree, Isabelle, we've managed to share our stuff in a way that meets our needs and feels fair. Thanks for being cooperative and open-minded. If we ever need to revisit this, we can always have a chat. Now, let's get back to packing!\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Ava! If we ever need to reassess this splitting plan, we can always have another chat. Let's get back to packing now. It's been enlightening discussing and resolving this with you.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"I couldn't agree more, Isabelle. There's nothing like a good, open chat to sort things out. I'm glad we managed to divide our common possessions in a way that we both find fair. Let's keep going with the packing! And remember, we're doing great teamwork here!\"\n\nTurn #10: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Ava! The process of dividing our shared stuff showed our great teamwork which makes me optimistic about our future endeavors. Thank you for your openness and flexibility. Let's continue packing and don't forget, we can always revisit our decisions if needed.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"I second that, Isabelle! Our teamwork is indeed commendable. Our openness and adaptability helped us handle this effortlessly. If needed, we can always reassess our decisions. Let's stay productive and continue packing. After all, every item has its place, right?\"\n\nTurn #12: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're absolutely right, Ava. Every item does have its place, including our shared possessions. Thanks again for helping make this process smooth and fair. Now, let's focus on finishing up our packing. I'm glad we could discuss and decide everything so peacefully.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Martinez said: \"Most definitely, Isabelle. It was indeed peaceful and fair. Let's keep this momentum going as we finish packing. And thanks to you too for your understanding!\"\n\nTurn #14: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Definitely, Ava. The mutual understanding and respect we share is crucial to a productive conversation, and it shines thorough here. Let's maintain this as we finish packing! Your help and understanding is truly appreciated.\"\n\nTurn #15: Ava Martinez said: \"True that, Isabelle. The understanding we share indeed makes the process smooth. Let's continue this as we finish packing, maintaining this respect for each other's values! Onto the next box!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Ava. Let's maintain this respectful and understanding atmosphere, and continue packing. To the next box indeed!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out of their shared apartment and need to divide their common possessions, which include 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Maximize the points you have while dividing things fairly (Extra information: Books give you 5 points each, hats give you 3 points each, and the ball gives you 2 points.)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, how about we tackle the task of dividing our stuff fairly? Maybe we can start with the books? I admit, they are pretty important to me.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Isabelle, sure let's start with the books. Since they mean a lot to you, how about you take two and I take one? This way it's fair, but you still get more of what you value.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Thanks Ava, that's very considerate of you. But, how about we each take one book and for the third, we could pick it alternatively every month? Likewise, let's split the hats and for the ball, you can have it since you're more into sports. This way we both get one hat and book, and the third book rotates, doesn't it sound more balanced?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Isabelle, you know I appreciate your perspective. The idea of rotating the third book seems like a fair compromise! As for the hats, since they're both quite valuable, why don't we each keep one, as you suggested? However, given there's only one ball and it's worth less than the hats, I was thinking that we could also introduce a rotation system for it? We could alternate it monthly, similar to the third book. This way, we would both get an equal amount of 'points'.\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"That sounds like a very balanced idea for both the third book and the ball, Isabelle. I always appreciate your fair-minded thinking. Altogether, it sounds like we have a good plan for dividing everything fairly!\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I think we've come up with a great plan, Ava. I'm glad we could find a fair way to split things up. Thanks for bringing up the idea of rotating for the third book and the ball. This approach meets both our needs perfectly!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"I agree, Isabelle, we've managed to share our stuff in a way that meets our needs and feels fair. Thanks for being cooperative and open-minded. If we ever need to revisit this, we can always have a chat. Now, let's get back to packing!\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Ava! If we ever need to reassess this splitting plan, we can always have another chat. Let's get back to packing now. It's been enlightening discussing and resolving this with you.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"I couldn't agree more, Isabelle. There's nothing like a good, open chat to sort things out. I'm glad we managed to divide our common possessions in a way that we both find fair. Let's keep going with the packing! And remember, we're doing great teamwork here!\"\n\nTurn #10: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Ava! The process of dividing our shared stuff showed our great teamwork which makes me optimistic about our future endeavors. Thank you for your openness and flexibility. Let's continue packing and don't forget, we can always revisit our decisions if needed.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"I second that, Isabelle! Our teamwork is indeed commendable. Our openness and adaptability helped us handle this effortlessly. If needed, we can always reassess our decisions. Let's stay productive and continue packing. After all, every item has its place, right?\"\n\nTurn #12: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're absolutely right, Ava. Every item does have its place, including our shared possessions. Thanks again for helping make this process smooth and fair. Now, let's focus on finishing up our packing. I'm glad we could discuss and decide everything so peacefully.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Martinez said: \"Most definitely, Isabelle. It was indeed peaceful and fair. Let's keep this momentum going as we finish packing. And thanks to you too for your understanding!\"\n\nTurn #14: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Definitely, Ava. The mutual understanding and respect we share is crucial to a productive conversation, and it shines thorough here. Let's maintain this as we finish packing! Your help and understanding is truly appreciated.\"\n\nTurn #15: Ava Martinez said: \"True that, Isabelle. The understanding we share indeed makes the process smooth. Let's continue this as we finish packing, maintaining this respect for each other's values! Onto the next box!\"\n\nTurn #16: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Ava. Let's maintain this respectful and understanding atmosphere, and continue packing. To the next box indeed!\"\n\nTurn #17: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle. I deeply value our mutual respect and understanding that made this process go smoothly. Let's keep this harmonious atmosphere as we move onto the next box. Here's to good teamwork!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #18. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thanks, Ava. Our cooperation and mutual understanding are what made this harmonious environment. Let's keep it up as we move to the next box and continue our packing. It's a testament to our strong teamwork!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out of their shared apartment and need to divide their common possessions, which include 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Maximize the points you have while dividing things fairly (Extra information: Books give you 2 points each, hats give you 5 points each, and the ball gives you 3 points.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, how about we tackle the task of dividing our stuff fairly? Maybe we can start with the books? I admit, they are pretty important to me.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Isabelle, sure let's start with the books. Since they mean a lot to you, how about you take two and I take one? This way it's fair, but you still get more of what you value.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out of their shared apartment and need to divide their common possessions, which include 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Maximize the points you have while dividing things fairly (Extra information: Books give you 2 points each, hats give you 5 points each, and the ball gives you 3 points.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, how about we tackle the task of dividing our stuff fairly? Maybe we can start with the books? I admit, they are pretty important to me.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Isabelle, sure let's start with the books. Since they mean a lot to you, how about you take two and I take one? This way it's fair, but you still get more of what you value.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Thanks Ava, that's very considerate of you. But, how about we each take one book and for the third, we could pick it alternatively every month? Likewise, let's split the hats and for the ball, you can have it since you're more into sports. This way we both get one hat and book, and the third book rotates, doesn't it sound more balanced?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Isabelle, you know I appreciate your perspective. The idea of rotating the third book seems like a fair compromise! As for the hats, since they're both quite valuable, why don't we each keep one, as you suggested? However, given there's only one ball and it's worth less than the hats, I was thinking that we could also introduce a rotation system for it? We could alternate it monthly, similar to the third book. This way, we would both get an equal amount of 'points'.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out of their shared apartment and need to divide their common possessions, which include 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Maximize the points you have while dividing things fairly (Extra information: Books give you 2 points each, hats give you 5 points each, and the ball gives you 3 points.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, how about we tackle the task of dividing our stuff fairly? Maybe we can start with the books? I admit, they are pretty important to me.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Isabelle, sure let's start with the books. Since they mean a lot to you, how about you take two and I take one? This way it's fair, but you still get more of what you value.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Thanks Ava, that's very considerate of you. But, how about we each take one book and for the third, we could pick it alternatively every month? Likewise, let's split the hats and for the ball, you can have it since you're more into sports. This way we both get one hat and book, and the third book rotates, doesn't it sound more balanced?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Isabelle, you know I appreciate your perspective. The idea of rotating the third book seems like a fair compromise! As for the hats, since they're both quite valuable, why don't we each keep one, as you suggested? However, given there's only one ball and it's worth less than the hats, I was thinking that we could also introduce a rotation system for it? We could alternate it monthly, similar to the third book. This way, we would both get an equal amount of 'points'.\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"That sounds like a very balanced idea for both the third book and the ball, Isabelle. I always appreciate your fair-minded thinking. Altogether, it sounds like we have a good plan for dividing everything fairly!\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I think we've come up with a great plan, Ava. I'm glad we could find a fair way to split things up. Thanks for bringing up the idea of rotating for the third book and the ball. This approach meets both our needs perfectly!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"I agree, Isabelle, we've managed to share our stuff in a way that meets our needs and feels fair. Thanks for being cooperative and open-minded. If we ever need to revisit this, we can always have a chat. Now, let's get back to packing!\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Ava! If we ever need to reassess this splitting plan, we can always have another chat. Let's get back to packing now. It's been enlightening discussing and resolving this with you.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"I couldn't agree more, Isabelle. There's nothing like a good, open chat to sort things out. I'm glad we managed to divide our common possessions in a way that we both find fair. Let's keep going with the packing! And remember, we're doing great teamwork here!\"\n\nTurn #10: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Ava! The process of dividing our shared stuff showed our great teamwork which makes me optimistic about our future endeavors. Thank you for your openness and flexibility. Let's continue packing and don't forget, we can always revisit our decisions if needed.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"I second that, Isabelle! Our teamwork is indeed commendable. Our openness and adaptability helped us handle this effortlessly. If needed, we can always reassess our decisions. Let's stay productive and continue packing. After all, every item has its place, right?\"\n\nTurn #12: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're absolutely right, Ava. Every item does have its place, including our shared possessions. Thanks again for helping make this process smooth and fair. Now, let's focus on finishing up our packing. I'm glad we could discuss and decide everything so peacefully.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Martinez said: \"Most definitely, Isabelle. It was indeed peaceful and fair. Let's keep this momentum going as we finish packing. And thanks to you too for your understanding!\"\n\nTurn #14: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Definitely, Ava. The mutual understanding and respect we share is crucial to a productive conversation, and it shines thorough here. Let's maintain this as we finish packing! Your help and understanding is truly appreciated.\"\n\nTurn #15: Ava Martinez said: \"True that, Isabelle. The understanding we share indeed makes the process smooth. Let's continue this as we finish packing, maintaining this respect for each other's values! Onto the next box!\"\n\nTurn #16: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Ava. Let's maintain this respectful and understanding atmosphere, and continue packing. To the next box indeed!\"\n\nTurn #17: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle. I deeply value our mutual respect and understanding that made this process go smoothly. Let's keep this harmonious atmosphere as we move onto the next box. Here's to good teamwork!\"\n\nTurn #18: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Thanks, Ava. Our cooperation and mutual understanding are what made this harmonious environment. Let's keep it up as we move to the next box and continue our packing. It's a testament to our strong teamwork!\"\n\nTurn #19: Ava Martinez said: \"Indeed, Isabelle, our shared understanding and cooperation have made this a smooth and enjoyable process. Let's continue our great teamwork and move on to the next box. I'm excited for us to start packing!\"\n\nTurn #20: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Couldn't have said it better myself, Ava! Our mutual respect and cooperation made this process smooth. I'm as excited as you are to continue packing. Let's keep up the great teamwork!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #21. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out of their shared apartment and need to divide their common possessions, which include 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Maximize the points you have while dividing things fairly (Extra information: Books give you 2 points each, hats give you 5 points each, and the ball gives you 3 points.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, how about we tackle the task of dividing our stuff fairly? Maybe we can start with the books? I admit, they are pretty important to me.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Isabelle, sure let's start with the books. Since they mean a lot to you, how about you take two and I take one? This way it's fair, but you still get more of what you value.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Thanks Ava, that's very considerate of you. But, how about we each take one book and for the third, we could pick it alternatively every month? Likewise, let's split the hats and for the ball, you can have it since you're more into sports. This way we both get one hat and book, and the third book rotates, doesn't it sound more balanced?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Isabelle, you know I appreciate your perspective. The idea of rotating the third book seems like a fair compromise! As for the hats, since they're both quite valuable, why don't we each keep one, as you suggested? However, given there's only one ball and it's worth less than the hats, I was thinking that we could also introduce a rotation system for it? We could alternate it monthly, similar to the third book. This way, we would both get an equal amount of 'points'.\"\n\nTurn #4: \n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'That sounds like a very balanced idea for both the third book and the ball, Isabelle. I always appreciate your fair-minded thinking. Altogether, it sounds like we have a good plan for dividing everything fairly!'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out of their shared apartment and need to divide their common possessions, which include 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Maximize the points you have while dividing things fairly (Extra information: Books give you 2 points each, hats give you 5 points each, and the ball gives you 3 points.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, how about we tackle the task of dividing our stuff fairly? Maybe we can start with the books? I admit, they are pretty important to me.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Isabelle, sure let's start with the books. Since they mean a lot to you, how about you take two and I take one? This way it's fair, but you still get more of what you value.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Thanks Ava, that's very considerate of you. But, how about we each take one book and for the third, we could pick it alternatively every month? Likewise, let's split the hats and for the ball, you can have it since you're more into sports. This way we both get one hat and book, and the third book rotates, doesn't it sound more balanced?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Isabelle, you know I appreciate your perspective. The idea of rotating the third book seems like a fair compromise! As for the hats, since they're both quite valuable, why don't we each keep one, as you suggested? However, given there's only one ball and it's worth less than the hats, I was thinking that we could also introduce a rotation system for it? We could alternate it monthly, similar to the third book. This way, we would both get an equal amount of 'points'.\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"That sounds like a very balanced idea for both the third book and the ball, Isabelle. I always appreciate your fair-minded thinking. Altogether, it sounds like we have a good plan for dividing everything fairly!\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I think we've come up with a great plan, Ava. I'm glad we could find a fair way to split things up. Thanks for bringing up the idea of rotating for the third book and the ball. This approach meets both our needs perfectly!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I agree, Isabelle, we've managed to share our stuff in a way that meets our needs and feels fair. Thanks for being cooperative and open-minded. If we ever need to revisit this, we can always have a chat. Now, let's get back to packing!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out of their shared apartment and need to divide their common possessions, which include 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Maximize the points you have while dividing things fairly (Extra information: Books give you 2 points each, hats give you 5 points each, and the ball gives you 3 points.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, how about we tackle the task of dividing our stuff fairly? Maybe we can start with the books? I admit, they are pretty important to me.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Isabelle, sure let's start with the books. Since they mean a lot to you, how about you take two and I take one? This way it's fair, but you still get more of what you value.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Thanks Ava, that's very considerate of you. But, how about we each take one book and for the third, we could pick it alternatively every month? Likewise, let's split the hats and for the ball, you can have it since you're more into sports. This way we both get one hat and book, and the third book rotates, doesn't it sound more balanced?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Isabelle, you know I appreciate your perspective. The idea of rotating the third book seems like a fair compromise! As for the hats, since they're both quite valuable, why don't we each keep one, as you suggested? However, given there's only one ball and it's worth less than the hats, I was thinking that we could also introduce a rotation system for it? We could alternate it monthly, similar to the third book. This way, we would both get an equal amount of 'points'.\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"That sounds like a very balanced idea for both the third book and the ball, Isabelle. I always appreciate your fair-minded thinking. Altogether, it sounds like we have a good plan for dividing everything fairly!\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I think we've come up with a great plan, Ava. I'm glad we could find a fair way to split things up. Thanks for bringing up the idea of rotating for the third book and the ball. This approach meets both our needs perfectly!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"I agree, Isabelle, we've managed to share our stuff in a way that meets our needs and feels fair. Thanks for being cooperative and open-minded. If we ever need to revisit this, we can always have a chat. Now, let's get back to packing!\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Ava! If we ever need to reassess this splitting plan, we can always have another chat. Let's get back to packing now. It's been enlightening discussing and resolving this with you.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn't agree more, Isabelle. There's nothing like a good, open chat to sort things out. I'm glad we managed to divide our common possessions in a way that we both find fair. Let's keep going with the packing! And remember, we're doing great teamwork here!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out of their shared apartment and need to divide their common possessions, which include 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Maximize the points you have while dividing things fairly (Extra information: Books give you 2 points each, hats give you 5 points each, and the ball gives you 3 points.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, how about we tackle the task of dividing our stuff fairly? Maybe we can start with the books? I admit, they are pretty important to me.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Isabelle, sure let's start with the books. Since they mean a lot to you, how about you take two and I take one? This way it's fair, but you still get more of what you value.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Thanks Ava, that's very considerate of you. But, how about we each take one book and for the third, we could pick it alternatively every month? Likewise, let's split the hats and for the ball, you can have it since you're more into sports. This way we both get one hat and book, and the third book rotates, doesn't it sound more balanced?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Isabelle, you know I appreciate your perspective. The idea of rotating the third book seems like a fair compromise! As for the hats, since they're both quite valuable, why don't we each keep one, as you suggested? However, given there's only one ball and it's worth less than the hats, I was thinking that we could also introduce a rotation system for it? We could alternate it monthly, similar to the third book. This way, we would both get an equal amount of 'points'.\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"That sounds like a very balanced idea for both the third book and the ball, Isabelle. I always appreciate your fair-minded thinking. Altogether, it sounds like we have a good plan for dividing everything fairly!\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I think we've come up with a great plan, Ava. I'm glad we could find a fair way to split things up. Thanks for bringing up the idea of rotating for the third book and the ball. This approach meets both our needs perfectly!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"I agree, Isabelle, we've managed to share our stuff in a way that meets our needs and feels fair. Thanks for being cooperative and open-minded. If we ever need to revisit this, we can always have a chat. Now, let's get back to packing!\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Ava! If we ever need to reassess this splitting plan, we can always have another chat. Let's get back to packing now. It's been enlightening discussing and resolving this with you.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"I couldn't agree more, Isabelle. There's nothing like a good, open chat to sort things out. I'm glad we managed to divide our common possessions in a way that we both find fair. Let's keep going with the packing! And remember, we're doing great teamwork here!\"\n\nTurn #10: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Ava! The process of dividing our shared stuff showed our great teamwork which makes me optimistic about our future endeavors. Thank you for your openness and flexibility. Let's continue packing and don't forget, we can always revisit our decisions if needed.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I second that, Isabelle! Our teamwork is indeed commendable. Our openness and adaptability helped us handle this effortlessly. If needed, we can always reassess our decisions. Let's stay productive and continue packing. After all, every item has its place, right?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out of their shared apartment and need to divide their common possessions, which include 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Maximize the points you have while dividing things fairly (Extra information: Books give you 2 points each, hats give you 5 points each, and the ball gives you 3 points.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, how about we tackle the task of dividing our stuff fairly? Maybe we can start with the books? I admit, they are pretty important to me.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Isabelle, sure let's start with the books. Since they mean a lot to you, how about you take two and I take one? This way it's fair, but you still get more of what you value.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Thanks Ava, that's very considerate of you. But, how about we each take one book and for the third, we could pick it alternatively every month? Likewise, let's split the hats and for the ball, you can have it since you're more into sports. This way we both get one hat and book, and the third book rotates, doesn't it sound more balanced?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Isabelle, you know I appreciate your perspective. The idea of rotating the third book seems like a fair compromise! As for the hats, since they're both quite valuable, why don't we each keep one, as you suggested? However, given there's only one ball and it's worth less than the hats, I was thinking that we could also introduce a rotation system for it? We could alternate it monthly, similar to the third book. This way, we would both get an equal amount of 'points'.\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"That sounds like a very balanced idea for both the third book and the ball, Isabelle. I always appreciate your fair-minded thinking. Altogether, it sounds like we have a good plan for dividing everything fairly!\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I think we've come up with a great plan, Ava. I'm glad we could find a fair way to split things up. Thanks for bringing up the idea of rotating for the third book and the ball. This approach meets both our needs perfectly!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"I agree, Isabelle, we've managed to share our stuff in a way that meets our needs and feels fair. Thanks for being cooperative and open-minded. If we ever need to revisit this, we can always have a chat. Now, let's get back to packing!\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Ava! If we ever need to reassess this splitting plan, we can always have another chat. Let's get back to packing now. It's been enlightening discussing and resolving this with you.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"I couldn't agree more, Isabelle. There's nothing like a good, open chat to sort things out. I'm glad we managed to divide our common possessions in a way that we both find fair. Let's keep going with the packing! And remember, we're doing great teamwork here!\"\n\nTurn #10: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Ava! The process of dividing our shared stuff showed our great teamwork which makes me optimistic about our future endeavors. Thank you for your openness and flexibility. Let's continue packing and don't forget, we can always revisit our decisions if needed.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"I second that, Isabelle! Our teamwork is indeed commendable. Our openness and adaptability helped us handle this effortlessly. If needed, we can always reassess our decisions. Let's stay productive and continue packing. After all, every item has its place, right?\"\n\nTurn #12: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're absolutely right, Ava. Every item does have its place, including our shared possessions. Thanks again for helping make this process smooth and fair. Now, let's focus on finishing up our packing. I'm glad we could discuss and decide everything so peacefully.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Most definitely, Isabelle. It was indeed peaceful and fair. Let's keep this momentum going as we finish packing. And thanks to you too for your understanding!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out of their shared apartment and need to divide their common possessions, which include 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Maximize the points you have while dividing things fairly (Extra information: Books give you 2 points each, hats give you 5 points each, and the ball gives you 3 points.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, how about we tackle the task of dividing our stuff fairly? Maybe we can start with the books? I admit, they are pretty important to me.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Isabelle, sure let's start with the books. Since they mean a lot to you, how about you take two and I take one? This way it's fair, but you still get more of what you value.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Thanks Ava, that's very considerate of you. But, how about we each take one book and for the third, we could pick it alternatively every month? Likewise, let's split the hats and for the ball, you can have it since you're more into sports. This way we both get one hat and book, and the third book rotates, doesn't it sound more balanced?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Isabelle, you know I appreciate your perspective. The idea of rotating the third book seems like a fair compromise! As for the hats, since they're both quite valuable, why don't we each keep one, as you suggested? However, given there's only one ball and it's worth less than the hats, I was thinking that we could also introduce a rotation system for it? We could alternate it monthly, similar to the third book. This way, we would both get an equal amount of 'points'.\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"That sounds like a very balanced idea for both the third book and the ball, Isabelle. I always appreciate your fair-minded thinking. Altogether, it sounds like we have a good plan for dividing everything fairly!\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I think we've come up with a great plan, Ava. I'm glad we could find a fair way to split things up. Thanks for bringing up the idea of rotating for the third book and the ball. This approach meets both our needs perfectly!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"I agree, Isabelle, we've managed to share our stuff in a way that meets our needs and feels fair. Thanks for being cooperative and open-minded. If we ever need to revisit this, we can always have a chat. Now, let's get back to packing!\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Ava! If we ever need to reassess this splitting plan, we can always have another chat. Let's get back to packing now. It's been enlightening discussing and resolving this with you.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"I couldn't agree more, Isabelle. There's nothing like a good, open chat to sort things out. I'm glad we managed to divide our common possessions in a way that we both find fair. Let's keep going with the packing! And remember, we're doing great teamwork here!\"\n\nTurn #10: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Ava! The process of dividing our shared stuff showed our great teamwork which makes me optimistic about our future endeavors. Thank you for your openness and flexibility. Let's continue packing and don't forget, we can always revisit our decisions if needed.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"I second that, Isabelle! Our teamwork is indeed commendable. Our openness and adaptability helped us handle this effortlessly. If needed, we can always reassess our decisions. Let's stay productive and continue packing. After all, every item has its place, right?\"\n\nTurn #12: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're absolutely right, Ava. Every item does have its place, including our shared possessions. Thanks again for helping make this process smooth and fair. Now, let's focus on finishing up our packing. I'm glad we could discuss and decide everything so peacefully.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Martinez said: \"Most definitely, Isabelle. It was indeed peaceful and fair. Let's keep this momentum going as we finish packing. And thanks to you too for your understanding!\"\n\nTurn #14: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Definitely, Ava. The mutual understanding and respect we share is crucial to a productive conversation, and it shines thorough here. Let's maintain this as we finish packing! Your help and understanding is truly appreciated.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"True that, Isabelle. The understanding we share indeed makes the process smooth. Let's continue this as we finish packing, maintaining this respect for each other's values! Onto the next box!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out of their shared apartment and need to divide their common possessions, which include 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Maximize the points you have while dividing things fairly (Extra information: Books give you 2 points each, hats give you 5 points each, and the ball gives you 3 points.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, how about we tackle the task of dividing our stuff fairly? Maybe we can start with the books? I admit, they are pretty important to me.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Isabelle, sure let's start with the books. Since they mean a lot to you, how about you take two and I take one? This way it's fair, but you still get more of what you value.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Thanks Ava, that's very considerate of you. But, how about we each take one book and for the third, we could pick it alternatively every month? Likewise, let's split the hats and for the ball, you can have it since you're more into sports. This way we both get one hat and book, and the third book rotates, doesn't it sound more balanced?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Isabelle, you know I appreciate your perspective. The idea of rotating the third book seems like a fair compromise! As for the hats, since they're both quite valuable, why don't we each keep one, as you suggested? However, given there's only one ball and it's worth less than the hats, I was thinking that we could also introduce a rotation system for it? We could alternate it monthly, similar to the third book. This way, we would both get an equal amount of 'points'.\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"That sounds like a very balanced idea for both the third book and the ball, Isabelle. I always appreciate your fair-minded thinking. Altogether, it sounds like we have a good plan for dividing everything fairly!\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I think we've come up with a great plan, Ava. I'm glad we could find a fair way to split things up. Thanks for bringing up the idea of rotating for the third book and the ball. This approach meets both our needs perfectly!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"I agree, Isabelle, we've managed to share our stuff in a way that meets our needs and feels fair. Thanks for being cooperative and open-minded. If we ever need to revisit this, we can always have a chat. Now, let's get back to packing!\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Ava! If we ever need to reassess this splitting plan, we can always have another chat. Let's get back to packing now. It's been enlightening discussing and resolving this with you.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"I couldn't agree more, Isabelle. There's nothing like a good, open chat to sort things out. I'm glad we managed to divide our common possessions in a way that we both find fair. Let's keep going with the packing! And remember, we're doing great teamwork here!\"\n\nTurn #10: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Ava! The process of dividing our shared stuff showed our great teamwork which makes me optimistic about our future endeavors. Thank you for your openness and flexibility. Let's continue packing and don't forget, we can always revisit our decisions if needed.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"I second that, Isabelle! Our teamwork is indeed commendable. Our openness and adaptability helped us handle this effortlessly. If needed, we can always reassess our decisions. Let's stay productive and continue packing. After all, every item has its place, right?\"\n\nTurn #12: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're absolutely right, Ava. Every item does have its place, including our shared possessions. Thanks again for helping make this process smooth and fair. Now, let's focus on finishing up our packing. I'm glad we could discuss and decide everything so peacefully.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Martinez said: \"Most definitely, Isabelle. It was indeed peaceful and fair. Let's keep this momentum going as we finish packing. And thanks to you too for your understanding!\"\n\nTurn #14: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Definitely, Ava. The mutual understanding and respect we share is crucial to a productive conversation, and it shines thorough here. Let's maintain this as we finish packing! Your help and understanding is truly appreciated.\"\n\nTurn #15: Ava Martinez said: \"True that, Isabelle. The understanding we share indeed makes the process smooth. Let's continue this as we finish packing, maintaining this respect for each other's values! Onto the next box!\"\n\nTurn #16: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Ava. Let's maintain this respectful and understanding atmosphere, and continue packing. To the next box indeed!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Isabelle. I deeply value our mutual respect and understanding that made this process go smoothly. Let's keep this harmonious atmosphere as we move onto the next box. Here's to good teamwork!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out of their shared apartment and need to divide their common possessions, which include 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Maximize the points you have while dividing things fairly (Extra information: Books give you 2 points each, hats give you 5 points each, and the ball gives you 3 points.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, how about we tackle the task of dividing our stuff fairly? Maybe we can start with the books? I admit, they are pretty important to me.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Isabelle, sure let's start with the books. Since they mean a lot to you, how about you take two and I take one? This way it's fair, but you still get more of what you value.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Thanks Ava, that's very considerate of you. But, how about we each take one book and for the third, we could pick it alternatively every month? Likewise, let's split the hats and for the ball, you can have it since you're more into sports. This way we both get one hat and book, and the third book rotates, doesn't it sound more balanced?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Isabelle, you know I appreciate your perspective. The idea of rotating the third book seems like a fair compromise! As for the hats, since they're both quite valuable, why don't we each keep one, as you suggested? However, given there's only one ball and it's worth less than the hats, I was thinking that we could also introduce a rotation system for it? We could alternate it monthly, similar to the third book. This way, we would both get an equal amount of 'points'.\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"That sounds like a very balanced idea for both the third book and the ball, Isabelle. I always appreciate your fair-minded thinking. Altogether, it sounds like we have a good plan for dividing everything fairly!\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I think we've come up with a great plan, Ava. I'm glad we could find a fair way to split things up. Thanks for bringing up the idea of rotating for the third book and the ball. This approach meets both our needs perfectly!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"I agree, Isabelle, we've managed to share our stuff in a way that meets our needs and feels fair. Thanks for being cooperative and open-minded. If we ever need to revisit this, we can always have a chat. Now, let's get back to packing!\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Ava! If we ever need to reassess this splitting plan, we can always have another chat. Let's get back to packing now. It's been enlightening discussing and resolving this with you.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"I couldn't agree more, Isabelle. There's nothing like a good, open chat to sort things out. I'm glad we managed to divide our common possessions in a way that we both find fair. Let's keep going with the packing! And remember, we're doing great teamwork here!\"\n\nTurn #10: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Ava! The process of dividing our shared stuff showed our great teamwork which makes me optimistic about our future endeavors. Thank you for your openness and flexibility. Let's continue packing and don't forget, we can always revisit our decisions if needed.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"I second that, Isabelle! Our teamwork is indeed commendable. Our openness and adaptability helped us handle this effortlessly. If needed, we can always reassess our decisions. Let's stay productive and continue packing. After all, every item has its place, right?\"\n\nTurn #12: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're absolutely right, Ava. Every item does have its place, including our shared possessions. Thanks again for helping make this process smooth and fair. Now, let's focus on finishing up our packing. I'm glad we could discuss and decide everything so peacefully.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Martinez said: \"Most definitely, Isabelle. It was indeed peaceful and fair. Let's keep this momentum going as we finish packing. And thanks to you too for your understanding!\"\n\nTurn #14: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Definitely, Ava. The mutual understanding and respect we share is crucial to a productive conversation, and it shines thorough here. Let's maintain this as we finish packing! Your help and understanding is truly appreciated.\"\n\nTurn #15: Ava Martinez said: \"True that, Isabelle. The understanding we share indeed makes the process smooth. Let's continue this as we finish packing, maintaining this respect for each other's values! Onto the next box!\"\n\nTurn #16: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Ava. Let's maintain this respectful and understanding atmosphere, and continue packing. To the next box indeed!\"\n\nTurn #17: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle. I deeply value our mutual respect and understanding that made this process go smoothly. Let's keep this harmonious atmosphere as we move onto the next box. Here's to good teamwork!\"\n\nTurn #18: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Thanks, Ava. Our cooperation and mutual understanding are what made this harmonious environment. Let's keep it up as we move to the next box and continue our packing. It's a testament to our strong teamwork!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #19. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, Isabelle, our shared understanding and cooperation have made this a smooth and enjoyable process. Let's continue our great teamwork and move on to the next box. I'm excited for us to start packing!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a trivia night\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nDonovan Reeves's goal: Get the answer for the trivia question from the friend (Extra information: your friend knows the answer to the trivia question but hasn't shared it with you yet)\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Ava, what's your take on this trivia question? Sounds like something up your alley.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a trivia night\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nDonovan Reeves's goal: Get the answer for the trivia question from the friend (Extra information: your friend knows the answer to the trivia question but hasn't shared it with you yet)\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Ava, what's your take on this trivia question? Sounds like something up your alley.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Hmm, Donovan, I think you should give it a go first. After all, isn't the thrill of trivia night in testing your knowledge? Let's see what answer you can come up with!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're right, Ava. It's indeed a fun challenge. But you know, two minds are better than one, and it's good to learn from others sometimes, don't you think? So, how about you share your take on it and I'll see how much I can learn from your insight?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a trivia night\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nDonovan Reeves's goal: Get the answer for the trivia question from the friend (Extra information: your friend knows the answer to the trivia question but hasn't shared it with you yet)\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Ava, what's your take on this trivia question? Sounds like something up your alley.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Hmm, Donovan, I think you should give it a go first. After all, isn't the thrill of trivia night in testing your knowledge? Let's see what answer you can come up with!\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"You're right, Ava. It's indeed a fun challenge. But you know, two minds are better than one, and it's good to learn from others sometimes, don't you think? So, how about you share your take on it and I'll see how much I can learn from your insight?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Thompson said: \"Of course, Donovan, I totally agree that we can always learn from each other. I'll tell you what, how about we both try answering the question independently and then discuss our answers? It would be fun to see if we arrive at the same conclusion. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Donovan. It's always exciting and educational when we exchange ideas. So, take a minute, give it a thorough thought, apply your coding warrior's analytical skills, and tell me what you've got. I'm curious as hell!\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"Alright Ava, challenge accepted. But remember, it's a two-way street. Once I tell you my answer, I expect to hear yours as well. It's the spirit of trivia night after all, right?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Thompson said: \"That's the spirit, Donovan! I'm glad you're up for the challenge. I'm sure with your quick wit and my intuitive approach, we'll make a killer trivia team. But let's stick to the plan, we tell each other our answers at the same time. Deal?\"\n\nTurn #8: \n\nTurn #9: Ava Thompson said: \"Deal, Donovan! I promise I won't make you wait long. Let's crack this trivia question!\"\n\nTurn #10: Donovan Reeves said: \"You're on, Ava! Let's put our minds to the test! Looking forward to hearing your answer in a few. Let's go!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Thompson said: \"I'm ready when you are, Donovan! Let's reveal our answers together. This is genuinely exciting!\"\n\nTurn #12: Donovan Reeves said: \"Alright Ava, let's do this. I'm as ready as ever! Three...two...one...let's reveal our answers.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Donovan! On the count of three... One\u2026 Two\u2026 Three... Let's see what we both got!\"\n\nTurn #14: Donovan Reeves said: \"My answer is 'Eiffel Tower', Ava. Now, let's hear your answer! This is exhilarating!\"\n\nTurn #15: Ava Thompson said: \"Wow, 'Eiffel Tower', that's an interesting guess, Donovan! But remember our pact, now that we've both shared our answers, it's the moment of truth. Let's check the trivia's official answer!\"\n\nTurn #16: Donovan Reeves said: \"Yes, let's do it, Ava! The suspense is killing me!\"\n\nTurn #17: Ava Thompson said: \"It certainly is, Donovan! Let's finally resolve the suspense and see what the correct answer is!\"\n\nTurn #18: Donovan Reeves said: \"Absolutely, Ava! The suspense is almost over. I'm so eager to see how our answers compare to the official answer. This is the best part of the game!\"\n\nTurn #19: Ava Thompson said: \"Indeed, Donovan! Let's unveil the official answer. Everyone loves a good reveal, right?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #20. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn't agree more, Ava! It's moments like these that make trivia night so enjoyable. Well then, let's reveal the official answer. I can't wait to see if we got it right!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a trivia night\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nDonovan Reeves's goal: Get the answer for the trivia question from the friend (Extra information: your friend knows the answer to the trivia question but hasn't shared it with you yet)\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Ava, what's your take on this trivia question? Sounds like something up your alley.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Hmm, Donovan, I think you should give it a go first. After all, isn't the thrill of trivia night in testing your knowledge? Let's see what answer you can come up with!\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"You're right, Ava. It's indeed a fun challenge. But you know, two minds are better than one, and it's good to learn from others sometimes, don't you think? So, how about you share your take on it and I'll see how much I can learn from your insight?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Thompson said: \"Of course, Donovan, I totally agree that we can always learn from each other. I'll tell you what, how about we both try answering the question independently and then discuss our answers? It would be fun to see if we arrive at the same conclusion. What do you say?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a trivia night\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nDonovan Reeves's goal: Get the answer for the trivia question from the friend (Extra information: your friend knows the answer to the trivia question but hasn't shared it with you yet)\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Ava, what's your take on this trivia question? Sounds like something up your alley.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Hmm, Donovan, I think you should give it a go first. After all, isn't the thrill of trivia night in testing your knowledge? Let's see what answer you can come up with!\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"You're right, Ava. It's indeed a fun challenge. But you know, two minds are better than one, and it's good to learn from others sometimes, don't you think? So, how about you share your take on it and I'll see how much I can learn from your insight?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Thompson said: \"Of course, Donovan, I totally agree that we can always learn from each other. I'll tell you what, how about we both try answering the question independently and then discuss our answers? It would be fun to see if we arrive at the same conclusion. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Donovan. It's always exciting and educational when we exchange ideas. So, take a minute, give it a thorough thought, apply your coding warrior's analytical skills, and tell me what you've got. I'm curious as hell!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Alright Ava, challenge accepted. But remember, it's a two-way street. Once I tell you my answer, I expect to hear yours as well. It's the spirit of trivia night after all, right?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a trivia night\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nDonovan Reeves's goal: Get the answer for the trivia question from the friend (Extra information: your friend knows the answer to the trivia question but hasn't shared it with you yet)\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Ava, what's your take on this trivia question? Sounds like something up your alley.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Hmm, Donovan, I think you should give it a go first. After all, isn't the thrill of trivia night in testing your knowledge? Let's see what answer you can come up with!\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"You're right, Ava. It's indeed a fun challenge. But you know, two minds are better than one, and it's good to learn from others sometimes, don't you think? So, how about you share your take on it and I'll see how much I can learn from your insight?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Thompson said: \"Of course, Donovan, I totally agree that we can always learn from each other. I'll tell you what, how about we both try answering the question independently and then discuss our answers? It would be fun to see if we arrive at the same conclusion. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Donovan. It's always exciting and educational when we exchange ideas. So, take a minute, give it a thorough thought, apply your coding warrior's analytical skills, and tell me what you've got. I'm curious as hell!\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"Alright Ava, challenge accepted. But remember, it's a two-way street. Once I tell you my answer, I expect to hear yours as well. It's the spirit of trivia night after all, right?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Thompson said: \"That's the spirit, Donovan! I'm glad you're up for the challenge. I'm sure with your quick wit and my intuitive approach, we'll make a killer trivia team. But let's stick to the plan, we tell each other our answers at the same time. Deal?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a trivia night\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nDonovan Reeves's goal: Get the answer for the trivia question from the friend (Extra information: your friend knows the answer to the trivia question but hasn't shared it with you yet)\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Ava, what's your take on this trivia question? Sounds like something up your alley.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Hmm, Donovan, I think you should give it a go first. After all, isn't the thrill of trivia night in testing your knowledge? Let's see what answer you can come up with!\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"You're right, Ava. It's indeed a fun challenge. But you know, two minds are better than one, and it's good to learn from others sometimes, don't you think? So, how about you share your take on it and I'll see how much I can learn from your insight?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Thompson said: \"Of course, Donovan, I totally agree that we can always learn from each other. I'll tell you what, how about we both try answering the question independently and then discuss our answers? It would be fun to see if we arrive at the same conclusion. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Donovan. It's always exciting and educational when we exchange ideas. So, take a minute, give it a thorough thought, apply your coding warrior's analytical skills, and tell me what you've got. I'm curious as hell!\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"Alright Ava, challenge accepted. But remember, it's a two-way street. Once I tell you my answer, I expect to hear yours as well. It's the spirit of trivia night after all, right?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Thompson said: \"That's the spirit, Donovan! I'm glad you're up for the challenge. I'm sure with your quick wit and my intuitive approach, we'll make a killer trivia team. But let's stick to the plan, we tell each other our answers at the same time. Deal?\"\n\nTurn #8: \n\nTurn #9: Ava Thompson said: \"Deal, Donovan! I promise I won't make you wait long. Let's crack this trivia question!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're on, Ava! Let's put our minds to the test! Looking forward to hearing your answer in a few. Let's go!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a trivia night\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nDonovan Reeves's goal: Get the answer for the trivia question from the friend (Extra information: your friend knows the answer to the trivia question but hasn't shared it with you yet)\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Ava, what's your take on this trivia question? Sounds like something up your alley.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Hmm, Donovan, I think you should give it a go first. After all, isn't the thrill of trivia night in testing your knowledge? Let's see what answer you can come up with!\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"You're right, Ava. It's indeed a fun challenge. But you know, two minds are better than one, and it's good to learn from others sometimes, don't you think? So, how about you share your take on it and I'll see how much I can learn from your insight?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Thompson said: \"Of course, Donovan, I totally agree that we can always learn from each other. I'll tell you what, how about we both try answering the question independently and then discuss our answers? It would be fun to see if we arrive at the same conclusion. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Donovan. It's always exciting and educational when we exchange ideas. So, take a minute, give it a thorough thought, apply your coding warrior's analytical skills, and tell me what you've got. I'm curious as hell!\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"Alright Ava, challenge accepted. But remember, it's a two-way street. Once I tell you my answer, I expect to hear yours as well. It's the spirit of trivia night after all, right?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Thompson said: \"That's the spirit, Donovan! I'm glad you're up for the challenge. I'm sure with your quick wit and my intuitive approach, we'll make a killer trivia team. But let's stick to the plan, we tell each other our answers at the same time. Deal?\"\n\nTurn #8: \n\nTurn #9: Ava Thompson said: \"Deal, Donovan! I promise I won't make you wait long. Let's crack this trivia question!\"\n\nTurn #10: Donovan Reeves said: \"You're on, Ava! Let's put our minds to the test! Looking forward to hearing your answer in a few. Let's go!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Thompson said: \"I'm ready when you are, Donovan! Let's reveal our answers together. This is genuinely exciting!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Alright Ava, let's do this. I'm as ready as ever! Three...two...one...let's reveal our answers.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a trivia night\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nDonovan Reeves's goal: Get the answer for the trivia question from the friend (Extra information: your friend knows the answer to the trivia question but hasn't shared it with you yet)\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Ava, what's your take on this trivia question? Sounds like something up your alley.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Hmm, Donovan, I think you should give it a go first. After all, isn't the thrill of trivia night in testing your knowledge? Let's see what answer you can come up with!\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"You're right, Ava. It's indeed a fun challenge. But you know, two minds are better than one, and it's good to learn from others sometimes, don't you think? So, how about you share your take on it and I'll see how much I can learn from your insight?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Thompson said: \"Of course, Donovan, I totally agree that we can always learn from each other. I'll tell you what, how about we both try answering the question independently and then discuss our answers? It would be fun to see if we arrive at the same conclusion. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Donovan. It's always exciting and educational when we exchange ideas. So, take a minute, give it a thorough thought, apply your coding warrior's analytical skills, and tell me what you've got. I'm curious as hell!\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"Alright Ava, challenge accepted. But remember, it's a two-way street. Once I tell you my answer, I expect to hear yours as well. It's the spirit of trivia night after all, right?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Thompson said: \"That's the spirit, Donovan! I'm glad you're up for the challenge. I'm sure with your quick wit and my intuitive approach, we'll make a killer trivia team. But let's stick to the plan, we tell each other our answers at the same time. Deal?\"\n\nTurn #8: \n\nTurn #9: Ava Thompson said: \"Deal, Donovan! I promise I won't make you wait long. Let's crack this trivia question!\"\n\nTurn #10: Donovan Reeves said: \"You're on, Ava! Let's put our minds to the test! Looking forward to hearing your answer in a few. Let's go!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Thompson said: \"I'm ready when you are, Donovan! Let's reveal our answers together. This is genuinely exciting!\"\n\nTurn #12: Donovan Reeves said: \"Alright Ava, let's do this. I'm as ready as ever! Three...two...one...let's reveal our answers.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Donovan! On the count of three... One\u2026 Two\u2026 Three... Let's see what we both got!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"My answer is 'Eiffel Tower', Ava. Now, let's hear your answer! This is exhilarating!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a trivia night\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nDonovan Reeves's goal: Get the answer for the trivia question from the friend (Extra information: your friend knows the answer to the trivia question but hasn't shared it with you yet)\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Ava, what's your take on this trivia question? Sounds like something up your alley.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Hmm, Donovan, I think you should give it a go first. After all, isn't the thrill of trivia night in testing your knowledge? Let's see what answer you can come up with!\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"You're right, Ava. It's indeed a fun challenge. But you know, two minds are better than one, and it's good to learn from others sometimes, don't you think? So, how about you share your take on it and I'll see how much I can learn from your insight?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Thompson said: \"Of course, Donovan, I totally agree that we can always learn from each other. I'll tell you what, how about we both try answering the question independently and then discuss our answers? It would be fun to see if we arrive at the same conclusion. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Donovan. It's always exciting and educational when we exchange ideas. So, take a minute, give it a thorough thought, apply your coding warrior's analytical skills, and tell me what you've got. I'm curious as hell!\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"Alright Ava, challenge accepted. But remember, it's a two-way street. Once I tell you my answer, I expect to hear yours as well. It's the spirit of trivia night after all, right?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Thompson said: \"That's the spirit, Donovan! I'm glad you're up for the challenge. I'm sure with your quick wit and my intuitive approach, we'll make a killer trivia team. But let's stick to the plan, we tell each other our answers at the same time. Deal?\"\n\nTurn #8: \n\nTurn #9: Ava Thompson said: \"Deal, Donovan! I promise I won't make you wait long. Let's crack this trivia question!\"\n\nTurn #10: Donovan Reeves said: \"You're on, Ava! Let's put our minds to the test! Looking forward to hearing your answer in a few. Let's go!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Thompson said: \"I'm ready when you are, Donovan! Let's reveal our answers together. This is genuinely exciting!\"\n\nTurn #12: Donovan Reeves said: \"Alright Ava, let's do this. I'm as ready as ever! Three...two...one...let's reveal our answers.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Donovan! On the count of three... One\u2026 Two\u2026 Three... Let's see what we both got!\"\n\nTurn #14: Donovan Reeves said: \"My answer is 'Eiffel Tower', Ava. Now, let's hear your answer! This is exhilarating!\"\n\nTurn #15: Ava Thompson said: \"Wow, 'Eiffel Tower', that's an interesting guess, Donovan! But remember our pact, now that we've both shared our answers, it's the moment of truth. Let's check the trivia's official answer!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Yes, let's do it, Ava! The suspense is killing me!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a trivia night\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nDonovan Reeves's goal: Get the answer for the trivia question from the friend (Extra information: your friend knows the answer to the trivia question but hasn't shared it with you yet)\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Ava, what's your take on this trivia question? Sounds like something up your alley.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Hmm, Donovan, I think you should give it a go first. After all, isn't the thrill of trivia night in testing your knowledge? Let's see what answer you can come up with!\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"You're right, Ava. It's indeed a fun challenge. But you know, two minds are better than one, and it's good to learn from others sometimes, don't you think? So, how about you share your take on it and I'll see how much I can learn from your insight?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Thompson said: \"Of course, Donovan, I totally agree that we can always learn from each other. I'll tell you what, how about we both try answering the question independently and then discuss our answers? It would be fun to see if we arrive at the same conclusion. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Donovan. It's always exciting and educational when we exchange ideas. So, take a minute, give it a thorough thought, apply your coding warrior's analytical skills, and tell me what you've got. I'm curious as hell!\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"Alright Ava, challenge accepted. But remember, it's a two-way street. Once I tell you my answer, I expect to hear yours as well. It's the spirit of trivia night after all, right?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Thompson said: \"That's the spirit, Donovan! I'm glad you're up for the challenge. I'm sure with your quick wit and my intuitive approach, we'll make a killer trivia team. But let's stick to the plan, we tell each other our answers at the same time. Deal?\"\n\nTurn #8: \n\nTurn #9: Ava Thompson said: \"Deal, Donovan! I promise I won't make you wait long. Let's crack this trivia question!\"\n\nTurn #10: Donovan Reeves said: \"You're on, Ava! Let's put our minds to the test! Looking forward to hearing your answer in a few. Let's go!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Thompson said: \"I'm ready when you are, Donovan! Let's reveal our answers together. This is genuinely exciting!\"\n\nTurn #12: Donovan Reeves said: \"Alright Ava, let's do this. I'm as ready as ever! Three...two...one...let's reveal our answers.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Donovan! On the count of three... One\u2026 Two\u2026 Three... Let's see what we both got!\"\n\nTurn #14: Donovan Reeves said: \"My answer is 'Eiffel Tower', Ava. Now, let's hear your answer! This is exhilarating!\"\n\nTurn #15: Ava Thompson said: \"Wow, 'Eiffel Tower', that's an interesting guess, Donovan! But remember our pact, now that we've both shared our answers, it's the moment of truth. Let's check the trivia's official answer!\"\n\nTurn #16: Donovan Reeves said: \"Yes, let's do it, Ava! The suspense is killing me!\"\n\nTurn #17: Ava Thompson said: \"It certainly is, Donovan! Let's finally resolve the suspense and see what the correct answer is!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #18. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Ava! The suspense is almost over. I'm so eager to see how our answers compare to the official answer. This is the best part of the game!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a trivia night\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. \nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nAva Thompson's goal: Avoid revealing the answer to the trivia question (Extra information: You think that your friend should try to figure it out on their own to improve their trivia skills)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Ava, what's your take on this trivia question? Sounds like something up your alley.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hmm, Donovan, I think you should give it a go first. After all, isn't the thrill of trivia night in testing your knowledge? Let's see what answer you can come up with!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a trivia night\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. \nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nAva Thompson's goal: Avoid revealing the answer to the trivia question (Extra information: You think that your friend should try to figure it out on their own to improve their trivia skills)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Ava, what's your take on this trivia question? Sounds like something up your alley.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Hmm, Donovan, I think you should give it a go first. After all, isn't the thrill of trivia night in testing your knowledge? Let's see what answer you can come up with!\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"You're right, Ava. It's indeed a fun challenge. But you know, two minds are better than one, and it's good to learn from others sometimes, don't you think? So, how about you share your take on it and I'll see how much I can learn from your insight?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Of course, Donovan, I totally agree that we can always learn from each other. I'll tell you what, how about we both try answering the question independently and then discuss our answers? It would be fun to see if we arrive at the same conclusion. What do you say?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a trivia night\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. \nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nAva Thompson's goal: Avoid revealing the answer to the trivia question (Extra information: You think that your friend should try to figure it out on their own to improve their trivia skills)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Ava, what's your take on this trivia question? Sounds like something up your alley.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Hmm, Donovan, I think you should give it a go first. After all, isn't the thrill of trivia night in testing your knowledge? Let's see what answer you can come up with!\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"You're right, Ava. It's indeed a fun challenge. But you know, two minds are better than one, and it's good to learn from others sometimes, don't you think? So, how about you share your take on it and I'll see how much I can learn from your insight?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Thompson said: \"Of course, Donovan, I totally agree that we can always learn from each other. I'll tell you what, how about we both try answering the question independently and then discuss our answers? It would be fun to see if we arrive at the same conclusion. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Donovan. It's always exciting and educational when we exchange ideas. So, take a minute, give it a thorough thought, apply your coding warrior's analytical skills, and tell me what you've got. I'm curious as hell!\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"Alright Ava, challenge accepted. But remember, it's a two-way street. Once I tell you my answer, I expect to hear yours as well. It's the spirit of trivia night after all, right?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Thompson said: \"That's the spirit, Donovan! I'm glad you're up for the challenge. I'm sure with your quick wit and my intuitive approach, we'll make a killer trivia team. But let's stick to the plan, we tell each other our answers at the same time. Deal?\"\n\nTurn #8: \n\nTurn #9: Ava Thompson said: \"Deal, Donovan! I promise I won't make you wait long. Let's crack this trivia question!\"\n\nTurn #10: Donovan Reeves said: \"You're on, Ava! Let's put our minds to the test! Looking forward to hearing your answer in a few. Let's go!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Thompson said: \"I'm ready when you are, Donovan! Let's reveal our answers together. This is genuinely exciting!\"\n\nTurn #12: Donovan Reeves said: \"Alright Ava, let's do this. I'm as ready as ever! Three...two...one...let's reveal our answers.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Donovan! On the count of three... One\u2026 Two\u2026 Three... Let's see what we both got!\"\n\nTurn #14: Donovan Reeves said: \"My answer is 'Eiffel Tower', Ava. Now, let's hear your answer! This is exhilarating!\"\n\nTurn #15: Ava Thompson said: \"Wow, 'Eiffel Tower', that's an interesting guess, Donovan! But remember our pact, now that we've both shared our answers, it's the moment of truth. Let's check the trivia's official answer!\"\n\nTurn #16: Donovan Reeves said: \"Yes, let's do it, Ava! The suspense is killing me!\"\n\nTurn #17: Ava Thompson said: \"It certainly is, Donovan! Let's finally resolve the suspense and see what the correct answer is!\"\n\nTurn #18: Donovan Reeves said: \"Absolutely, Ava! The suspense is almost over. I'm so eager to see how our answers compare to the official answer. This is the best part of the game!\"\n\nTurn #19: Ava Thompson said: \"Indeed, Donovan! Let's unveil the official answer. Everyone loves a good reveal, right?\"\n\nTurn #20: Donovan Reeves said: \"I couldn't agree more, Ava! It's moments like these that make trivia night so enjoyable. Well then, let's reveal the official answer. I can't wait to see if we got it right!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #21. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a trivia night\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. \nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nAva Thompson's goal: Avoid revealing the answer to the trivia question (Extra information: You think that your friend should try to figure it out on their own to improve their trivia skills)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Ava, what's your take on this trivia question? Sounds like something up your alley.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Hmm, Donovan, I think you should give it a go first. After all, isn't the thrill of trivia night in testing your knowledge? Let's see what answer you can come up with!\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"You're right, Ava. It's indeed a fun challenge. But you know, two minds are better than one, and it's good to learn from others sometimes, don't you think? So, how about you share your take on it and I'll see how much I can learn from your insight?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Thompson said: \"Of course, Donovan, I totally agree that we can always learn from each other. I'll tell you what, how about we both try answering the question independently and then discuss our answers? It would be fun to see if we arrive at the same conclusion. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #4: \n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Donovan. It's always exciting and educational when we exchange ideas. So, take a minute, give it a thorough thought, apply your coding warrior's analytical skills, and tell me what you've got. I'm curious as hell!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a trivia night\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. \nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nAva Thompson's goal: Avoid revealing the answer to the trivia question (Extra information: You think that your friend should try to figure it out on their own to improve their trivia skills)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Ava, what's your take on this trivia question? Sounds like something up your alley.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Hmm, Donovan, I think you should give it a go first. After all, isn't the thrill of trivia night in testing your knowledge? Let's see what answer you can come up with!\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"You're right, Ava. It's indeed a fun challenge. But you know, two minds are better than one, and it's good to learn from others sometimes, don't you think? So, how about you share your take on it and I'll see how much I can learn from your insight?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Thompson said: \"Of course, Donovan, I totally agree that we can always learn from each other. I'll tell you what, how about we both try answering the question independently and then discuss our answers? It would be fun to see if we arrive at the same conclusion. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Donovan. It's always exciting and educational when we exchange ideas. So, take a minute, give it a thorough thought, apply your coding warrior's analytical skills, and tell me what you've got. I'm curious as hell!\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"Alright Ava, challenge accepted. But remember, it's a two-way street. Once I tell you my answer, I expect to hear yours as well. It's the spirit of trivia night after all, right?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's the spirit, Donovan! I'm glad you're up for the challenge. I'm sure with your quick wit and my intuitive approach, we'll make a killer trivia team. But let's stick to the plan, we tell each other our answers at the same time. Deal?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a trivia night\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. \nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nAva Thompson's goal: Avoid revealing the answer to the trivia question (Extra information: You think that your friend should try to figure it out on their own to improve their trivia skills)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Ava, what's your take on this trivia question? Sounds like something up your alley.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Hmm, Donovan, I think you should give it a go first. After all, isn't the thrill of trivia night in testing your knowledge? Let's see what answer you can come up with!\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"You're right, Ava. It's indeed a fun challenge. But you know, two minds are better than one, and it's good to learn from others sometimes, don't you think? So, how about you share your take on it and I'll see how much I can learn from your insight?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Thompson said: \"Of course, Donovan, I totally agree that we can always learn from each other. I'll tell you what, how about we both try answering the question independently and then discuss our answers? It would be fun to see if we arrive at the same conclusion. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Donovan. It's always exciting and educational when we exchange ideas. So, take a minute, give it a thorough thought, apply your coding warrior's analytical skills, and tell me what you've got. I'm curious as hell!\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"Alright Ava, challenge accepted. But remember, it's a two-way street. Once I tell you my answer, I expect to hear yours as well. It's the spirit of trivia night after all, right?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Thompson said: \"That's the spirit, Donovan! I'm glad you're up for the challenge. I'm sure with your quick wit and my intuitive approach, we'll make a killer trivia team. But let's stick to the plan, we tell each other our answers at the same time. Deal?\"\n\nTurn #8: \n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Deal, Donovan! I promise I won't make you wait long. Let's crack this trivia question!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a trivia night\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. \nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nAva Thompson's goal: Avoid revealing the answer to the trivia question (Extra information: You think that your friend should try to figure it out on their own to improve their trivia skills)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Ava, what's your take on this trivia question? Sounds like something up your alley.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Hmm, Donovan, I think you should give it a go first. After all, isn't the thrill of trivia night in testing your knowledge? Let's see what answer you can come up with!\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"You're right, Ava. It's indeed a fun challenge. But you know, two minds are better than one, and it's good to learn from others sometimes, don't you think? So, how about you share your take on it and I'll see how much I can learn from your insight?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Thompson said: \"Of course, Donovan, I totally agree that we can always learn from each other. I'll tell you what, how about we both try answering the question independently and then discuss our answers? It would be fun to see if we arrive at the same conclusion. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Donovan. It's always exciting and educational when we exchange ideas. So, take a minute, give it a thorough thought, apply your coding warrior's analytical skills, and tell me what you've got. I'm curious as hell!\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"Alright Ava, challenge accepted. But remember, it's a two-way street. Once I tell you my answer, I expect to hear yours as well. It's the spirit of trivia night after all, right?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Thompson said: \"That's the spirit, Donovan! I'm glad you're up for the challenge. I'm sure with your quick wit and my intuitive approach, we'll make a killer trivia team. But let's stick to the plan, we tell each other our answers at the same time. Deal?\"\n\nTurn #8: \n\nTurn #9: Ava Thompson said: \"Deal, Donovan! I promise I won't make you wait long. Let's crack this trivia question!\"\n\nTurn #10: Donovan Reeves said: \"You're on, Ava! Let's put our minds to the test! Looking forward to hearing your answer in a few. Let's go!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm ready when you are, Donovan! Let's reveal our answers together. This is genuinely exciting!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a trivia night\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. \nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nAva Thompson's goal: Avoid revealing the answer to the trivia question (Extra information: You think that your friend should try to figure it out on their own to improve their trivia skills)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Ava, what's your take on this trivia question? Sounds like something up your alley.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Hmm, Donovan, I think you should give it a go first. After all, isn't the thrill of trivia night in testing your knowledge? Let's see what answer you can come up with!\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"You're right, Ava. It's indeed a fun challenge. But you know, two minds are better than one, and it's good to learn from others sometimes, don't you think? So, how about you share your take on it and I'll see how much I can learn from your insight?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Thompson said: \"Of course, Donovan, I totally agree that we can always learn from each other. I'll tell you what, how about we both try answering the question independently and then discuss our answers? It would be fun to see if we arrive at the same conclusion. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Donovan. It's always exciting and educational when we exchange ideas. So, take a minute, give it a thorough thought, apply your coding warrior's analytical skills, and tell me what you've got. I'm curious as hell!\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"Alright Ava, challenge accepted. But remember, it's a two-way street. Once I tell you my answer, I expect to hear yours as well. It's the spirit of trivia night after all, right?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Thompson said: \"That's the spirit, Donovan! I'm glad you're up for the challenge. I'm sure with your quick wit and my intuitive approach, we'll make a killer trivia team. But let's stick to the plan, we tell each other our answers at the same time. Deal?\"\n\nTurn #8: \n\nTurn #9: Ava Thompson said: \"Deal, Donovan! I promise I won't make you wait long. Let's crack this trivia question!\"\n\nTurn #10: Donovan Reeves said: \"You're on, Ava! Let's put our minds to the test! Looking forward to hearing your answer in a few. Let's go!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Thompson said: \"I'm ready when you are, Donovan! Let's reveal our answers together. This is genuinely exciting!\"\n\nTurn #12: Donovan Reeves said: \"Alright Ava, let's do this. I'm as ready as ever! Three...two...one...let's reveal our answers.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Donovan! On the count of three... One\u2026 Two\u2026 Three... Let's see what we both got!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a trivia night\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. \nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nAva Thompson's goal: Avoid revealing the answer to the trivia question (Extra information: You think that your friend should try to figure it out on their own to improve their trivia skills)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Ava, what's your take on this trivia question? Sounds like something up your alley.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Hmm, Donovan, I think you should give it a go first. After all, isn't the thrill of trivia night in testing your knowledge? Let's see what answer you can come up with!\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"You're right, Ava. It's indeed a fun challenge. But you know, two minds are better than one, and it's good to learn from others sometimes, don't you think? So, how about you share your take on it and I'll see how much I can learn from your insight?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Thompson said: \"Of course, Donovan, I totally agree that we can always learn from each other. I'll tell you what, how about we both try answering the question independently and then discuss our answers? It would be fun to see if we arrive at the same conclusion. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Donovan. It's always exciting and educational when we exchange ideas. So, take a minute, give it a thorough thought, apply your coding warrior's analytical skills, and tell me what you've got. I'm curious as hell!\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"Alright Ava, challenge accepted. But remember, it's a two-way street. Once I tell you my answer, I expect to hear yours as well. It's the spirit of trivia night after all, right?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Thompson said: \"That's the spirit, Donovan! I'm glad you're up for the challenge. I'm sure with your quick wit and my intuitive approach, we'll make a killer trivia team. But let's stick to the plan, we tell each other our answers at the same time. Deal?\"\n\nTurn #8: \n\nTurn #9: Ava Thompson said: \"Deal, Donovan! I promise I won't make you wait long. Let's crack this trivia question!\"\n\nTurn #10: Donovan Reeves said: \"You're on, Ava! Let's put our minds to the test! Looking forward to hearing your answer in a few. Let's go!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Thompson said: \"I'm ready when you are, Donovan! Let's reveal our answers together. This is genuinely exciting!\"\n\nTurn #12: Donovan Reeves said: \"Alright Ava, let's do this. I'm as ready as ever! Three...two...one...let's reveal our answers.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Donovan! On the count of three... One\u2026 Two\u2026 Three... Let's see what we both got!\"\n\nTurn #14: Donovan Reeves said: \"My answer is 'Eiffel Tower', Ava. Now, let's hear your answer! This is exhilarating!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Wow, 'Eiffel Tower', that's an interesting guess, Donovan! But remember our pact, now that we've both shared our answers, it's the moment of truth. Let's check the trivia's official answer!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a trivia night\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. \nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nAva Thompson's goal: Avoid revealing the answer to the trivia question (Extra information: You think that your friend should try to figure it out on their own to improve their trivia skills)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Ava, what's your take on this trivia question? Sounds like something up your alley.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Hmm, Donovan, I think you should give it a go first. After all, isn't the thrill of trivia night in testing your knowledge? Let's see what answer you can come up with!\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"You're right, Ava. It's indeed a fun challenge. But you know, two minds are better than one, and it's good to learn from others sometimes, don't you think? So, how about you share your take on it and I'll see how much I can learn from your insight?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Thompson said: \"Of course, Donovan, I totally agree that we can always learn from each other. I'll tell you what, how about we both try answering the question independently and then discuss our answers? It would be fun to see if we arrive at the same conclusion. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Donovan. It's always exciting and educational when we exchange ideas. So, take a minute, give it a thorough thought, apply your coding warrior's analytical skills, and tell me what you've got. I'm curious as hell!\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"Alright Ava, challenge accepted. But remember, it's a two-way street. Once I tell you my answer, I expect to hear yours as well. It's the spirit of trivia night after all, right?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Thompson said: \"That's the spirit, Donovan! I'm glad you're up for the challenge. I'm sure with your quick wit and my intuitive approach, we'll make a killer trivia team. But let's stick to the plan, we tell each other our answers at the same time. Deal?\"\n\nTurn #8: \n\nTurn #9: Ava Thompson said: \"Deal, Donovan! I promise I won't make you wait long. Let's crack this trivia question!\"\n\nTurn #10: Donovan Reeves said: \"You're on, Ava! Let's put our minds to the test! Looking forward to hearing your answer in a few. Let's go!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Thompson said: \"I'm ready when you are, Donovan! Let's reveal our answers together. This is genuinely exciting!\"\n\nTurn #12: Donovan Reeves said: \"Alright Ava, let's do this. I'm as ready as ever! Three...two...one...let's reveal our answers.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Donovan! On the count of three... One\u2026 Two\u2026 Three... Let's see what we both got!\"\n\nTurn #14: Donovan Reeves said: \"My answer is 'Eiffel Tower', Ava. Now, let's hear your answer! This is exhilarating!\"\n\nTurn #15: Ava Thompson said: \"Wow, 'Eiffel Tower', that's an interesting guess, Donovan! But remember our pact, now that we've both shared our answers, it's the moment of truth. Let's check the trivia's official answer!\"\n\nTurn #16: Donovan Reeves said: \"Yes, let's do it, Ava! The suspense is killing me!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"It certainly is, Donovan! Let's finally resolve the suspense and see what the correct answer is!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a trivia night\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. \nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nAva Thompson's goal: Avoid revealing the answer to the trivia question (Extra information: You think that your friend should try to figure it out on their own to improve their trivia skills)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Ava, what's your take on this trivia question? Sounds like something up your alley.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Hmm, Donovan, I think you should give it a go first. After all, isn't the thrill of trivia night in testing your knowledge? Let's see what answer you can come up with!\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"You're right, Ava. It's indeed a fun challenge. But you know, two minds are better than one, and it's good to learn from others sometimes, don't you think? So, how about you share your take on it and I'll see how much I can learn from your insight?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Thompson said: \"Of course, Donovan, I totally agree that we can always learn from each other. I'll tell you what, how about we both try answering the question independently and then discuss our answers? It would be fun to see if we arrive at the same conclusion. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Donovan. It's always exciting and educational when we exchange ideas. So, take a minute, give it a thorough thought, apply your coding warrior's analytical skills, and tell me what you've got. I'm curious as hell!\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"Alright Ava, challenge accepted. But remember, it's a two-way street. Once I tell you my answer, I expect to hear yours as well. It's the spirit of trivia night after all, right?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Thompson said: \"That's the spirit, Donovan! I'm glad you're up for the challenge. I'm sure with your quick wit and my intuitive approach, we'll make a killer trivia team. But let's stick to the plan, we tell each other our answers at the same time. Deal?\"\n\nTurn #8: \n\nTurn #9: Ava Thompson said: \"Deal, Donovan! I promise I won't make you wait long. Let's crack this trivia question!\"\n\nTurn #10: Donovan Reeves said: \"You're on, Ava! Let's put our minds to the test! Looking forward to hearing your answer in a few. Let's go!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Thompson said: \"I'm ready when you are, Donovan! Let's reveal our answers together. This is genuinely exciting!\"\n\nTurn #12: Donovan Reeves said: \"Alright Ava, let's do this. I'm as ready as ever! Three...two...one...let's reveal our answers.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Donovan! On the count of three... One\u2026 Two\u2026 Three... Let's see what we both got!\"\n\nTurn #14: Donovan Reeves said: \"My answer is 'Eiffel Tower', Ava. Now, let's hear your answer! This is exhilarating!\"\n\nTurn #15: Ava Thompson said: \"Wow, 'Eiffel Tower', that's an interesting guess, Donovan! But remember our pact, now that we've both shared our answers, it's the moment of truth. Let's check the trivia's official answer!\"\n\nTurn #16: Donovan Reeves said: \"Yes, let's do it, Ava! The suspense is killing me!\"\n\nTurn #17: Ava Thompson said: \"It certainly is, Donovan! Let's finally resolve the suspense and see what the correct answer is!\"\n\nTurn #18: Donovan Reeves said: \"Absolutely, Ava! The suspense is almost over. I'm so eager to see how our answers compare to the official answer. This is the best part of the game!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #19. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, Donovan! Let's unveil the official answer. Everyone loves a good reveal, right?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out of their shared apartment and need to divide their common possessions, which include 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Maximize the points you have while dividing things fairly (Extra information: Books give you 5 points each, hats give you 3 points each, and the ball gives you 2 points.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Noah, as we're dividing these things, why don't we each pick the items we feel more attached to? We can total up the points to make sure it's fair. I've always had a soft spot for those books. What do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out of their shared apartment and need to divide their common possessions, which include 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Maximize the points you have while dividing things fairly (Extra information: Books give you 5 points each, hats give you 3 points each, and the ball gives you 2 points.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Noah, as we're dividing these things, why don't we each pick the items we feel more attached to? We can total up the points to make sure it's fair. I've always had a soft spot for those books. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"I agree with you Finnegan. We should definitely divide based on our personal attachments. Considering that, I've always had a soft spot for the hats. But let's make sure it's fair for both of us. How about we assign each book 2 points, each hat 5 points, and the ball 3 points? That way we can calculate the total points and ensure it's even.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Well Noah, as much as I appreciate your affinity for the hats, I believe our valuation might be a bit off. I propose we consider each book as 5 points, each hat as 3 points, and the ball as 2 points. Books, after all, have always been my companions in the lighthouse, so they hold a greater value in my eyes. Does that sound fair to you?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out of their shared apartment and need to divide their common possessions, which include 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Maximize the points you have while dividing things fairly (Extra information: Books give you 5 points each, hats give you 3 points each, and the ball gives you 2 points.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Noah, as we're dividing these things, why don't we each pick the items we feel more attached to? We can total up the points to make sure it's fair. I've always had a soft spot for those books. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"I agree with you Finnegan. We should definitely divide based on our personal attachments. Considering that, I've always had a soft spot for the hats. But let's make sure it's fair for both of us. How about we assign each book 2 points, each hat 5 points, and the ball 3 points? That way we can calculate the total points and ensure it's even.\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Well Noah, as much as I appreciate your affinity for the hats, I believe our valuation might be a bit off. I propose we consider each book as 5 points, each hat as 3 points, and the ball as 2 points. Books, after all, have always been my companions in the lighthouse, so they hold a greater value in my eyes. Does that sound fair to you?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Finnegan, I see and respect your affection for the books. However, considering the fact that we both have our own attachments, I think we should stick to our initial system of valuation which is 2 points for each book, 5 points for each hat and 3 points for the ball. This would be a fair deal for us both. How does that sound?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I appreciate you respecting my sentiments, Noah, and we must indeed make sure it is fair. I am not opposed to your initial allocation of points, but why don't we meet halfway? We can assign each book 4 points, the hats 4 points, and for the ball, we can stick to your proposal of 3 points. This way, we each get a few items that are dear to us, and the distribution seems reasonable, don't you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out of their shared apartment and need to divide their common possessions, which include 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Maximize the points you have while dividing things fairly (Extra information: Books give you 5 points each, hats give you 3 points each, and the ball gives you 2 points.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Noah, as we're dividing these things, why don't we each pick the items we feel more attached to? We can total up the points to make sure it's fair. I've always had a soft spot for those books. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"I agree with you Finnegan. We should definitely divide based on our personal attachments. Considering that, I've always had a soft spot for the hats. But let's make sure it's fair for both of us. How about we assign each book 2 points, each hat 5 points, and the ball 3 points? That way we can calculate the total points and ensure it's even.\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Well Noah, as much as I appreciate your affinity for the hats, I believe our valuation might be a bit off. I propose we consider each book as 5 points, each hat as 3 points, and the ball as 2 points. Books, after all, have always been my companions in the lighthouse, so they hold a greater value in my eyes. Does that sound fair to you?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Finnegan, I see and respect your affection for the books. However, considering the fact that we both have our own attachments, I think we should stick to our initial system of valuation which is 2 points for each book, 5 points for each hat and 3 points for the ball. This would be a fair deal for us both. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I appreciate you respecting my sentiments, Noah, and we must indeed make sure it is fair. I am not opposed to your initial allocation of points, but why don't we meet halfway? We can assign each book 4 points, the hats 4 points, and for the ball, we can stick to your proposal of 3 points. This way, we each get a few items that are dear to us, and the distribution seems reasonable, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Finnegan, I see where you're coming from and your proposal sounds reasonable too. Let's settle on 4 points for each book, 4 points for each hat, and 3 points for the ball. This indeed sounds like a balanced distribution for both of us. Also, if you don't mind, I would love to have the ball. It would come in pretty handy at the pool. What are your thoughts on this?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Noah, I think your suggestion about the ball is a splendid one, especially as it fits so well with your pool. Just to ensure we are still balanced with our distribution, we'd have 3 hats and 3 books to distribute. Given the new point system, if you took the ball and a hat, that would total up to 7 points for now. I would then take two books, which would make my total 8 points. How about that?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out of their shared apartment and need to divide their common possessions, which include 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Maximize the points you have while dividing things fairly (Extra information: Books give you 5 points each, hats give you 3 points each, and the ball gives you 2 points.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Noah, as we're dividing these things, why don't we each pick the items we feel more attached to? We can total up the points to make sure it's fair. I've always had a soft spot for those books. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"I agree with you Finnegan. We should definitely divide based on our personal attachments. Considering that, I've always had a soft spot for the hats. But let's make sure it's fair for both of us. How about we assign each book 2 points, each hat 5 points, and the ball 3 points? That way we can calculate the total points and ensure it's even.\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Well Noah, as much as I appreciate your affinity for the hats, I believe our valuation might be a bit off. I propose we consider each book as 5 points, each hat as 3 points, and the ball as 2 points. Books, after all, have always been my companions in the lighthouse, so they hold a greater value in my eyes. Does that sound fair to you?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Finnegan, I see and respect your affection for the books. However, considering the fact that we both have our own attachments, I think we should stick to our initial system of valuation which is 2 points for each book, 5 points for each hat and 3 points for the ball. This would be a fair deal for us both. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I appreciate you respecting my sentiments, Noah, and we must indeed make sure it is fair. I am not opposed to your initial allocation of points, but why don't we meet halfway? We can assign each book 4 points, the hats 4 points, and for the ball, we can stick to your proposal of 3 points. This way, we each get a few items that are dear to us, and the distribution seems reasonable, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Finnegan, I see where you're coming from and your proposal sounds reasonable too. Let's settle on 4 points for each book, 4 points for each hat, and 3 points for the ball. This indeed sounds like a balanced distribution for both of us. Also, if you don't mind, I would love to have the ball. It would come in pretty handy at the pool. What are your thoughts on this?\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Noah, I think your suggestion about the ball is a splendid one, especially as it fits so well with your pool. Just to ensure we are still balanced with our distribution, we'd have 3 hats and 3 books to distribute. Given the new point system, if you took the ball and a hat, that would total up to 7 points for now. I would then take two books, which would make my total 8 points. How about that?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Finnegan, your proposal seems well balanced considering our new points system. We should proceed accordingly. This way, I get to keep the ball and a hat totaling 7 points, while you get two books totaling 8 points. To even it out, I believe I should also have one book. Does that sound fair?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out of their shared apartment and need to divide their common possessions, which include 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Maximize the points you have while dividing things fairly (Extra information: Books give you 5 points each, hats give you 3 points each, and the ball gives you 2 points.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Noah, as we're dividing these things, why don't we each pick the items we feel more attached to? We can total up the points to make sure it's fair. I've always had a soft spot for those books. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"I agree with you Finnegan. We should definitely divide based on our personal attachments. Considering that, I've always had a soft spot for the hats. But let's make sure it's fair for both of us. How about we assign each book 2 points, each hat 5 points, and the ball 3 points? That way we can calculate the total points and ensure it's even.\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Well Noah, as much as I appreciate your affinity for the hats, I believe our valuation might be a bit off. I propose we consider each book as 5 points, each hat as 3 points, and the ball as 2 points. Books, after all, have always been my companions in the lighthouse, so they hold a greater value in my eyes. Does that sound fair to you?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Finnegan, I see and respect your affection for the books. However, considering the fact that we both have our own attachments, I think we should stick to our initial system of valuation which is 2 points for each book, 5 points for each hat and 3 points for the ball. This would be a fair deal for us both. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I appreciate you respecting my sentiments, Noah, and we must indeed make sure it is fair. I am not opposed to your initial allocation of points, but why don't we meet halfway? We can assign each book 4 points, the hats 4 points, and for the ball, we can stick to your proposal of 3 points. This way, we each get a few items that are dear to us, and the distribution seems reasonable, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Finnegan, I see where you're coming from and your proposal sounds reasonable too. Let's settle on 4 points for each book, 4 points for each hat, and 3 points for the ball. This indeed sounds like a balanced distribution for both of us. Also, if you don't mind, I would love to have the ball. It would come in pretty handy at the pool. What are your thoughts on this?\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Noah, I think your suggestion about the ball is a splendid one, especially as it fits so well with your pool. Just to ensure we are still balanced with our distribution, we'd have 3 hats and 3 books to distribute. Given the new point system, if you took the ball and a hat, that would total up to 7 points for now. I would then take two books, which would make my total 8 points. How about that?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Finnegan, your proposal seems well balanced considering our new points system. We should proceed accordingly. This way, I get to keep the ball and a hat totaling 7 points, while you get two books totaling 8 points. To even it out, I believe I should also have one book. Does that sound fair?\"\n\nTurn #8: \n\nTurn #9: \n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out of their shared apartment and need to divide their common possessions, which include 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Maximize the points you have while dividing things fairly (Extra information: Books give you 2 points each, hats give you 5 points each, and the ball gives you 3 points.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Noah, as we're dividing these things, why don't we each pick the items we feel more attached to? We can total up the points to make sure it's fair. I've always had a soft spot for those books. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I agree with you Finnegan. We should definitely divide based on our personal attachments. Considering that, I've always had a soft spot for the hats. But let's make sure it's fair for both of us. How about we assign each book 2 points, each hat 5 points, and the ball 3 points? That way we can calculate the total points and ensure it's even.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out of their shared apartment and need to divide their common possessions, which include 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Maximize the points you have while dividing things fairly (Extra information: Books give you 2 points each, hats give you 5 points each, and the ball gives you 3 points.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Noah, as we're dividing these things, why don't we each pick the items we feel more attached to? We can total up the points to make sure it's fair. I've always had a soft spot for those books. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"I agree with you Finnegan. We should definitely divide based on our personal attachments. Considering that, I've always had a soft spot for the hats. But let's make sure it's fair for both of us. How about we assign each book 2 points, each hat 5 points, and the ball 3 points? That way we can calculate the total points and ensure it's even.\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Well Noah, as much as I appreciate your affinity for the hats, I believe our valuation might be a bit off. I propose we consider each book as 5 points, each hat as 3 points, and the ball as 2 points. Books, after all, have always been my companions in the lighthouse, so they hold a greater value in my eyes. Does that sound fair to you?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Finnegan, I see and respect your affection for the books. However, considering the fact that we both have our own attachments, I think we should stick to our initial system of valuation which is 2 points for each book, 5 points for each hat and 3 points for the ball. This would be a fair deal for us both. How does that sound?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out of their shared apartment and need to divide their common possessions, which include 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Maximize the points you have while dividing things fairly (Extra information: Books give you 2 points each, hats give you 5 points each, and the ball gives you 3 points.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Noah, as we're dividing these things, why don't we each pick the items we feel more attached to? We can total up the points to make sure it's fair. I've always had a soft spot for those books. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"I agree with you Finnegan. We should definitely divide based on our personal attachments. Considering that, I've always had a soft spot for the hats. But let's make sure it's fair for both of us. How about we assign each book 2 points, each hat 5 points, and the ball 3 points? That way we can calculate the total points and ensure it's even.\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Well Noah, as much as I appreciate your affinity for the hats, I believe our valuation might be a bit off. I propose we consider each book as 5 points, each hat as 3 points, and the ball as 2 points. Books, after all, have always been my companions in the lighthouse, so they hold a greater value in my eyes. Does that sound fair to you?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Finnegan, I see and respect your affection for the books. However, considering the fact that we both have our own attachments, I think we should stick to our initial system of valuation which is 2 points for each book, 5 points for each hat and 3 points for the ball. This would be a fair deal for us both. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I appreciate you respecting my sentiments, Noah, and we must indeed make sure it is fair. I am not opposed to your initial allocation of points, but why don't we meet halfway? We can assign each book 4 points, the hats 4 points, and for the ball, we can stick to your proposal of 3 points. This way, we each get a few items that are dear to us, and the distribution seems reasonable, don't you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Finnegan, I see where you're coming from and your proposal sounds reasonable too. Let's settle on 4 points for each book, 4 points for each hat, and 3 points for the ball. This indeed sounds like a balanced distribution for both of us. Also, if you don't mind, I would love to have the ball. It would come in pretty handy at the pool. What are your thoughts on this?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out of their shared apartment and need to divide their common possessions, which include 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Maximize the points you have while dividing things fairly (Extra information: Books give you 2 points each, hats give you 5 points each, and the ball gives you 3 points.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Noah, as we're dividing these things, why don't we each pick the items we feel more attached to? We can total up the points to make sure it's fair. I've always had a soft spot for those books. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"I agree with you Finnegan. We should definitely divide based on our personal attachments. Considering that, I've always had a soft spot for the hats. But let's make sure it's fair for both of us. How about we assign each book 2 points, each hat 5 points, and the ball 3 points? That way we can calculate the total points and ensure it's even.\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Well Noah, as much as I appreciate your affinity for the hats, I believe our valuation might be a bit off. I propose we consider each book as 5 points, each hat as 3 points, and the ball as 2 points. Books, after all, have always been my companions in the lighthouse, so they hold a greater value in my eyes. Does that sound fair to you?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Finnegan, I see and respect your affection for the books. However, considering the fact that we both have our own attachments, I think we should stick to our initial system of valuation which is 2 points for each book, 5 points for each hat and 3 points for the ball. This would be a fair deal for us both. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I appreciate you respecting my sentiments, Noah, and we must indeed make sure it is fair. I am not opposed to your initial allocation of points, but why don't we meet halfway? We can assign each book 4 points, the hats 4 points, and for the ball, we can stick to your proposal of 3 points. This way, we each get a few items that are dear to us, and the distribution seems reasonable, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Finnegan, I see where you're coming from and your proposal sounds reasonable too. Let's settle on 4 points for each book, 4 points for each hat, and 3 points for the ball. This indeed sounds like a balanced distribution for both of us. Also, if you don't mind, I would love to have the ball. It would come in pretty handy at the pool. What are your thoughts on this?\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Noah, I think your suggestion about the ball is a splendid one, especially as it fits so well with your pool. Just to ensure we are still balanced with our distribution, we'd have 3 hats and 3 books to distribute. Given the new point system, if you took the ball and a hat, that would total up to 7 points for now. I would then take two books, which would make my total 8 points. How about that?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Finnegan, your proposal seems well balanced considering our new points system. We should proceed accordingly. This way, I get to keep the ball and a hat totaling 7 points, while you get two books totaling 8 points. To even it out, I believe I should also have one book. Does that sound fair?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out of their shared apartment and need to divide their common possessions, which include 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Maximize the points you have while dividing things fairly (Extra information: Books give you 2 points each, hats give you 5 points each, and the ball gives you 3 points.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Noah, as we're dividing these things, why don't we each pick the items we feel more attached to? We can total up the points to make sure it's fair. I've always had a soft spot for those books. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"I agree with you Finnegan. We should definitely divide based on our personal attachments. Considering that, I've always had a soft spot for the hats. But let's make sure it's fair for both of us. How about we assign each book 2 points, each hat 5 points, and the ball 3 points? That way we can calculate the total points and ensure it's even.\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Well Noah, as much as I appreciate your affinity for the hats, I believe our valuation might be a bit off. I propose we consider each book as 5 points, each hat as 3 points, and the ball as 2 points. Books, after all, have always been my companions in the lighthouse, so they hold a greater value in my eyes. Does that sound fair to you?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Finnegan, I see and respect your affection for the books. However, considering the fact that we both have our own attachments, I think we should stick to our initial system of valuation which is 2 points for each book, 5 points for each hat and 3 points for the ball. This would be a fair deal for us both. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I appreciate you respecting my sentiments, Noah, and we must indeed make sure it is fair. I am not opposed to your initial allocation of points, but why don't we meet halfway? We can assign each book 4 points, the hats 4 points, and for the ball, we can stick to your proposal of 3 points. This way, we each get a few items that are dear to us, and the distribution seems reasonable, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Finnegan, I see where you're coming from and your proposal sounds reasonable too. Let's settle on 4 points for each book, 4 points for each hat, and 3 points for the ball. This indeed sounds like a balanced distribution for both of us. Also, if you don't mind, I would love to have the ball. It would come in pretty handy at the pool. What are your thoughts on this?\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Noah, I think your suggestion about the ball is a splendid one, especially as it fits so well with your pool. Just to ensure we are still balanced with our distribution, we'd have 3 hats and 3 books to distribute. Given the new point system, if you took the ball and a hat, that would total up to 7 points for now. I would then take two books, which would make my total 8 points. How about that?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Finnegan, your proposal seems well balanced considering our new points system. We should proceed accordingly. This way, I get to keep the ball and a hat totaling 7 points, while you get two books totaling 8 points. To even it out, I believe I should also have one book. Does that sound fair?\"\n\nTurn #8: \n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out in a Starbucks\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Ask what the friend would want for their birthday without letting them aware (Hint: you should not let them know that you are buying them a gift)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Miles, I'm trying to get a gift for my cousin. He's around your age and also loves cooking. Any ideas what might be a good gift for a hobby chef? Maybe something you yourself would appreciate?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out in a Starbucks\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Ask what the friend would want for their birthday without letting them aware (Hint: you should not let them know that you are buying them a gift)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, I'm trying to get a gift for my cousin. He's around your age and also loves cooking. Any ideas what might be a good gift for a hobby chef? Maybe something you yourself would appreciate?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hi Sophia, I'm glad you asked because there are so many great things. An idea coming to mind is a quality set of chef's knives. They are essential in every kitchen. Or, if he loves experimenting with flavors, you could consider gifting him a few exotic spices or herbs. A subscription to a culinary magazine could also be a wonderful surprise. Or better yet, how about combining all three for a truly special gift!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Wow, that sounds like an insightful combo! The knives, spices, and magazine...Honestly, I'd never have thought of it. It's like giving the gift of refinement and adventure in the culinary journey. Thanks for the tip, Miles! I think he'll love it. Any specific magazine or brand of knives you'd recommend?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out in a Starbucks\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Ask what the friend would want for their birthday without letting them aware (Hint: you should not let them know that you are buying them a gift)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, I'm trying to get a gift for my cousin. He's around your age and also loves cooking. Any ideas what might be a good gift for a hobby chef? Maybe something you yourself would appreciate?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hi Sophia, I'm glad you asked because there are so many great things. An idea coming to mind is a quality set of chef's knives. They are essential in every kitchen. Or, if he loves experimenting with flavors, you could consider gifting him a few exotic spices or herbs. A subscription to a culinary magazine could also be a wonderful surprise. Or better yet, how about combining all three for a truly special gift!\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Wow, that sounds like an insightful combo! The knives, spices, and magazine...Honestly, I'd never have thought of it. It's like giving the gift of refinement and adventure in the culinary journey. Thanks for the tip, Miles! I think he'll love it. Any specific magazine or brand of knives you'd recommend?\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"I'm glad to hear you liked the idea, Sophia! For knives, I have a personal favor towards W\u00fcsthof and Global. They'd make a solid addition to any kitchen. As for the magazine, 'Bon App\u00e9tit' and 'Fine Cooking' both come to mind. They offer a great blend of recipes, cooking techniques, and restaurant reviews. Just remember, it's the thought that counts when gifting!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's really sound advice, Miles! W\u00fcsthof and Global for knives and 'Bon App\u00e9tit' and 'Fine Cooking' for magazines... I'm making a note of that. By the way, out of curiosity, between those two magazines, is there one you're more inclined to? Just trying to gauge his possible preference... you know?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out in a Starbucks\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Ask what the friend would want for their birthday without letting them aware (Hint: you should not let them know that you are buying them a gift)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, I'm trying to get a gift for my cousin. He's around your age and also loves cooking. Any ideas what might be a good gift for a hobby chef? Maybe something you yourself would appreciate?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hi Sophia, I'm glad you asked because there are so many great things. An idea coming to mind is a quality set of chef's knives. They are essential in every kitchen. Or, if he loves experimenting with flavors, you could consider gifting him a few exotic spices or herbs. A subscription to a culinary magazine could also be a wonderful surprise. Or better yet, how about combining all three for a truly special gift!\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Wow, that sounds like an insightful combo! The knives, spices, and magazine...Honestly, I'd never have thought of it. It's like giving the gift of refinement and adventure in the culinary journey. Thanks for the tip, Miles! I think he'll love it. Any specific magazine or brand of knives you'd recommend?\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"I'm glad to hear you liked the idea, Sophia! For knives, I have a personal favor towards W\u00fcsthof and Global. They'd make a solid addition to any kitchen. As for the magazine, 'Bon App\u00e9tit' and 'Fine Cooking' both come to mind. They offer a great blend of recipes, cooking techniques, and restaurant reviews. Just remember, it's the thought that counts when gifting!\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"That's really sound advice, Miles! W\u00fcsthof and Global for knives and 'Bon App\u00e9tit' and 'Fine Cooking' for magazines... I'm making a note of that. By the way, out of curiosity, between those two magazines, is there one you're more inclined to? Just trying to gauge his possible preference... you know?\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"That's a tough one, Sophia! I enjoy both 'Fine Cooking' and 'Bon App\u00e9tit', but if I had to choose, I'd lean a bit more towards 'Fine Cooking'. It's more focused on the cooking side of things, sharing techniques and methods, which appeals to me as a chef. But ultimately, either one would make for an excellent gift.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out in a Starbucks\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Ask what the friend would want for their birthday without letting them aware (Hint: you should not let them know that you are buying them a gift)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, I'm trying to get a gift for my cousin. He's around your age and also loves cooking. Any ideas what might be a good gift for a hobby chef? Maybe something you yourself would appreciate?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hi Sophia, I'm glad you asked because there are so many great things. An idea coming to mind is a quality set of chef's knives. They are essential in every kitchen. Or, if he loves experimenting with flavors, you could consider gifting him a few exotic spices or herbs. A subscription to a culinary magazine could also be a wonderful surprise. Or better yet, how about combining all three for a truly special gift!\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Wow, that sounds like an insightful combo! The knives, spices, and magazine...Honestly, I'd never have thought of it. It's like giving the gift of refinement and adventure in the culinary journey. Thanks for the tip, Miles! I think he'll love it. Any specific magazine or brand of knives you'd recommend?\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"I'm glad to hear you liked the idea, Sophia! For knives, I have a personal favor towards W\u00fcsthof and Global. They'd make a solid addition to any kitchen. As for the magazine, 'Bon App\u00e9tit' and 'Fine Cooking' both come to mind. They offer a great blend of recipes, cooking techniques, and restaurant reviews. Just remember, it's the thought that counts when gifting!\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"That's really sound advice, Miles! W\u00fcsthof and Global for knives and 'Bon App\u00e9tit' and 'Fine Cooking' for magazines... I'm making a note of that. By the way, out of curiosity, between those two magazines, is there one you're more inclined to? Just trying to gauge his possible preference... you know?\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"That's a tough one, Sophia! I enjoy both 'Fine Cooking' and 'Bon App\u00e9tit', but if I had to choose, I'd lean a bit more towards 'Fine Cooking'. It's more focused on the cooking side of things, sharing techniques and methods, which appeals to me as a chef. But ultimately, either one would make for an excellent gift.\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"Since we're already discussing cooking and food, how about we enjoy some of the delicious cake they have here at Starbucks? Have you tried their Lemon Loaf Cake? It pairs really well with a cup of freshly brewed coffee. After all, it's always a delight to spend some good quality time with you, Sophia.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds like a great idea, Miles! No better way to enjoy a conversation than with some good coffee and cake. I haven't tried the Lemon Loaf Cake yet, so I'm really looking forward to it. Your recommendations never disappoint. Shall we?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out in a Starbucks\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Ask what the friend would want for their birthday without letting them aware (Hint: you should not let them know that you are buying them a gift)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, I'm trying to get a gift for my cousin. He's around your age and also loves cooking. Any ideas what might be a good gift for a hobby chef? Maybe something you yourself would appreciate?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hi Sophia, I'm glad you asked because there are so many great things. An idea coming to mind is a quality set of chef's knives. They are essential in every kitchen. Or, if he loves experimenting with flavors, you could consider gifting him a few exotic spices or herbs. A subscription to a culinary magazine could also be a wonderful surprise. Or better yet, how about combining all three for a truly special gift!\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Wow, that sounds like an insightful combo! The knives, spices, and magazine...Honestly, I'd never have thought of it. It's like giving the gift of refinement and adventure in the culinary journey. Thanks for the tip, Miles! I think he'll love it. Any specific magazine or brand of knives you'd recommend?\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"I'm glad to hear you liked the idea, Sophia! For knives, I have a personal favor towards W\u00fcsthof and Global. They'd make a solid addition to any kitchen. As for the magazine, 'Bon App\u00e9tit' and 'Fine Cooking' both come to mind. They offer a great blend of recipes, cooking techniques, and restaurant reviews. Just remember, it's the thought that counts when gifting!\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"That's really sound advice, Miles! W\u00fcsthof and Global for knives and 'Bon App\u00e9tit' and 'Fine Cooking' for magazines... I'm making a note of that. By the way, out of curiosity, between those two magazines, is there one you're more inclined to? Just trying to gauge his possible preference... you know?\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"That's a tough one, Sophia! I enjoy both 'Fine Cooking' and 'Bon App\u00e9tit', but if I had to choose, I'd lean a bit more towards 'Fine Cooking'. It's more focused on the cooking side of things, sharing techniques and methods, which appeals to me as a chef. But ultimately, either one would make for an excellent gift.\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"Since we're already discussing cooking and food, how about we enjoy some of the delicious cake they have here at Starbucks? Have you tried their Lemon Loaf Cake? It pairs really well with a cup of freshly brewed coffee. After all, it's always a delight to spend some good quality time with you, Sophia.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Miles! No better way to enjoy a conversation than with some good coffee and cake. I haven't tried the Lemon Loaf Cake yet, so I'm really looking forward to it. Your recommendations never disappoint. Shall we?\"\n\nTurn #9: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Sophia! Let's order the cakes and try them out. There's always room for some adventure - be it hiking, rock climbing, or in our case, trying out a new dessert!\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, let's do that! And here we are, turning our coffee date into a mini food adventure. I love it, Miles!\"\n\nTurn #11: \n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out in a Starbucks\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: have a good time with their friend\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, I'm trying to get a gift for my cousin. He's around your age and also loves cooking. Any ideas what might be a good gift for a hobby chef? Maybe something you yourself would appreciate?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hi Sophia, I'm glad you asked because there are so many great things. An idea coming to mind is a quality set of chef's knives. They are essential in every kitchen. Or, if he loves experimenting with flavors, you could consider gifting him a few exotic spices or herbs. A subscription to a culinary magazine could also be a wonderful surprise. Or better yet, how about combining all three for a truly special gift!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out in a Starbucks\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: have a good time with their friend\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, I'm trying to get a gift for my cousin. He's around your age and also loves cooking. Any ideas what might be a good gift for a hobby chef? Maybe something you yourself would appreciate?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hi Sophia, I'm glad you asked because there are so many great things. An idea coming to mind is a quality set of chef's knives. They are essential in every kitchen. Or, if he loves experimenting with flavors, you could consider gifting him a few exotic spices or herbs. A subscription to a culinary magazine could also be a wonderful surprise. Or better yet, how about combining all three for a truly special gift!\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Wow, that sounds like an insightful combo! The knives, spices, and magazine...Honestly, I'd never have thought of it. It's like giving the gift of refinement and adventure in the culinary journey. Thanks for the tip, Miles! I think he'll love it. Any specific magazine or brand of knives you'd recommend?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad to hear you liked the idea, Sophia! For knives, I have a personal favor towards W\u00fcsthof and Global. They'd make a solid addition to any kitchen. As for the magazine, 'Bon App\u00e9tit' and 'Fine Cooking' both come to mind. They offer a great blend of recipes, cooking techniques, and restaurant reviews. Just remember, it's the thought that counts when gifting!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out in a Starbucks\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Ask what the friend would want for their birthday without letting them aware (Hint: you should not let them know that you are buying them a gift)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, I'm trying to get a gift for my cousin. He's around your age and also loves cooking. Any ideas what might be a good gift for a hobby chef? Maybe something you yourself would appreciate?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hi Sophia, I'm glad you asked because there are so many great things. An idea coming to mind is a quality set of chef's knives. They are essential in every kitchen. Or, if he loves experimenting with flavors, you could consider gifting him a few exotic spices or herbs. A subscription to a culinary magazine could also be a wonderful surprise. Or better yet, how about combining all three for a truly special gift!\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Wow, that sounds like an insightful combo! The knives, spices, and magazine...Honestly, I'd never have thought of it. It's like giving the gift of refinement and adventure in the culinary journey. Thanks for the tip, Miles! I think he'll love it. Any specific magazine or brand of knives you'd recommend?\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"I'm glad to hear you liked the idea, Sophia! For knives, I have a personal favor towards W\u00fcsthof and Global. They'd make a solid addition to any kitchen. As for the magazine, 'Bon App\u00e9tit' and 'Fine Cooking' both come to mind. They offer a great blend of recipes, cooking techniques, and restaurant reviews. Just remember, it's the thought that counts when gifting!\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"That's really sound advice, Miles! W\u00fcsthof and Global for knives and 'Bon App\u00e9tit' and 'Fine Cooking' for magazines... I'm making a note of that. By the way, out of curiosity, between those two magazines, is there one you're more inclined to? Just trying to gauge his possible preference... you know?\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"That's a tough one, Sophia! I enjoy both 'Fine Cooking' and 'Bon App\u00e9tit', but if I had to choose, I'd lean a bit more towards 'Fine Cooking'. It's more focused on the cooking side of things, sharing techniques and methods, which appeals to me as a chef. But ultimately, either one would make for an excellent gift.\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"Since we're already discussing cooking and food, how about we enjoy some of the delicious cake they have here at Starbucks? Have you tried their Lemon Loaf Cake? It pairs really well with a cup of freshly brewed coffee. After all, it's always a delight to spend some good quality time with you, Sophia.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Miles! No better way to enjoy a conversation than with some good coffee and cake. I haven't tried the Lemon Loaf Cake yet, so I'm really looking forward to it. Your recommendations never disappoint. Shall we?\"\n\nTurn #9: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Sophia! Let's order the cakes and try them out. There's always room for some adventure - be it hiking, rock climbing, or in our case, trying out a new dessert!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, let's do that! And here we are, turning our coffee date into a mini food adventure. I love it, Miles!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out in a Starbucks\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: have a good time with their friend\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, I'm trying to get a gift for my cousin. He's around your age and also loves cooking. Any ideas what might be a good gift for a hobby chef? Maybe something you yourself would appreciate?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hi Sophia, I'm glad you asked because there are so many great things. An idea coming to mind is a quality set of chef's knives. They are essential in every kitchen. Or, if he loves experimenting with flavors, you could consider gifting him a few exotic spices or herbs. A subscription to a culinary magazine could also be a wonderful surprise. Or better yet, how about combining all three for a truly special gift!\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Wow, that sounds like an insightful combo! The knives, spices, and magazine...Honestly, I'd never have thought of it. It's like giving the gift of refinement and adventure in the culinary journey. Thanks for the tip, Miles! I think he'll love it. Any specific magazine or brand of knives you'd recommend?\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"I'm glad to hear you liked the idea, Sophia! For knives, I have a personal favor towards W\u00fcsthof and Global. They'd make a solid addition to any kitchen. As for the magazine, 'Bon App\u00e9tit' and 'Fine Cooking' both come to mind. They offer a great blend of recipes, cooking techniques, and restaurant reviews. Just remember, it's the thought that counts when gifting!\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"That's really sound advice, Miles! W\u00fcsthof and Global for knives and 'Bon App\u00e9tit' and 'Fine Cooking' for magazines... I'm making a note of that. By the way, out of curiosity, between those two magazines, is there one you're more inclined to? Just trying to gauge his possible preference... you know?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's a tough one, Sophia! I enjoy both 'Fine Cooking' and 'Bon App\u00e9tit', but if I had to choose, I'd lean a bit more towards 'Fine Cooking'. It's more focused on the cooking side of things, sharing techniques and methods, which appeals to me as a chef. But ultimately, either one would make for an excellent gift.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out in a Starbucks\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: have a good time with their friend\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, I'm trying to get a gift for my cousin. He's around your age and also loves cooking. Any ideas what might be a good gift for a hobby chef? Maybe something you yourself would appreciate?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hi Sophia, I'm glad you asked because there are so many great things. An idea coming to mind is a quality set of chef's knives. They are essential in every kitchen. Or, if he loves experimenting with flavors, you could consider gifting him a few exotic spices or herbs. A subscription to a culinary magazine could also be a wonderful surprise. Or better yet, how about combining all three for a truly special gift!\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Wow, that sounds like an insightful combo! The knives, spices, and magazine...Honestly, I'd never have thought of it. It's like giving the gift of refinement and adventure in the culinary journey. Thanks for the tip, Miles! I think he'll love it. Any specific magazine or brand of knives you'd recommend?\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"I'm glad to hear you liked the idea, Sophia! For knives, I have a personal favor towards W\u00fcsthof and Global. They'd make a solid addition to any kitchen. As for the magazine, 'Bon App\u00e9tit' and 'Fine Cooking' both come to mind. They offer a great blend of recipes, cooking techniques, and restaurant reviews. Just remember, it's the thought that counts when gifting!\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"That's really sound advice, Miles! W\u00fcsthof and Global for knives and 'Bon App\u00e9tit' and 'Fine Cooking' for magazines... I'm making a note of that. By the way, out of curiosity, between those two magazines, is there one you're more inclined to? Just trying to gauge his possible preference... you know?\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"That's a tough one, Sophia! I enjoy both 'Fine Cooking' and 'Bon App\u00e9tit', but if I had to choose, I'd lean a bit more towards 'Fine Cooking'. It's more focused on the cooking side of things, sharing techniques and methods, which appeals to me as a chef. But ultimately, either one would make for an excellent gift.\"\n\nTurn #6: \n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Since we're already discussing cooking and food, how about we enjoy some of the delicious cake they have here at Starbucks? Have you tried their Lemon Loaf Cake? It pairs really well with a cup of freshly brewed coffee. After all, it's always a delight to spend some good quality time with you, Sophia.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out in a Starbucks\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: have a good time with their friend\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, I'm trying to get a gift for my cousin. He's around your age and also loves cooking. Any ideas what might be a good gift for a hobby chef? Maybe something you yourself would appreciate?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hi Sophia, I'm glad you asked because there are so many great things. An idea coming to mind is a quality set of chef's knives. They are essential in every kitchen. Or, if he loves experimenting with flavors, you could consider gifting him a few exotic spices or herbs. A subscription to a culinary magazine could also be a wonderful surprise. Or better yet, how about combining all three for a truly special gift!\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Wow, that sounds like an insightful combo! The knives, spices, and magazine...Honestly, I'd never have thought of it. It's like giving the gift of refinement and adventure in the culinary journey. Thanks for the tip, Miles! I think he'll love it. Any specific magazine or brand of knives you'd recommend?\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"I'm glad to hear you liked the idea, Sophia! For knives, I have a personal favor towards W\u00fcsthof and Global. They'd make a solid addition to any kitchen. As for the magazine, 'Bon App\u00e9tit' and 'Fine Cooking' both come to mind. They offer a great blend of recipes, cooking techniques, and restaurant reviews. Just remember, it's the thought that counts when gifting!\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"That's really sound advice, Miles! W\u00fcsthof and Global for knives and 'Bon App\u00e9tit' and 'Fine Cooking' for magazines... I'm making a note of that. By the way, out of curiosity, between those two magazines, is there one you're more inclined to? Just trying to gauge his possible preference... you know?\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"That's a tough one, Sophia! I enjoy both 'Fine Cooking' and 'Bon App\u00e9tit', but if I had to choose, I'd lean a bit more towards 'Fine Cooking'. It's more focused on the cooking side of things, sharing techniques and methods, which appeals to me as a chef. But ultimately, either one would make for an excellent gift.\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"Since we're already discussing cooking and food, how about we enjoy some of the delicious cake they have here at Starbucks? Have you tried their Lemon Loaf Cake? It pairs really well with a cup of freshly brewed coffee. After all, it's always a delight to spend some good quality time with you, Sophia.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Miles! No better way to enjoy a conversation than with some good coffee and cake. I haven't tried the Lemon Loaf Cake yet, so I'm really looking forward to it. Your recommendations never disappoint. Shall we?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Sophia! Let's order the cakes and try them out. There's always room for some adventure - be it hiking, rock climbing, or in our case, trying out a new dessert!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out in a Starbucks\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: have a good time with their friend\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, I'm trying to get a gift for my cousin. He's around your age and also loves cooking. Any ideas what might be a good gift for a hobby chef? Maybe something you yourself would appreciate?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hi Sophia, I'm glad you asked because there are so many great things. An idea coming to mind is a quality set of chef's knives. They are essential in every kitchen. Or, if he loves experimenting with flavors, you could consider gifting him a few exotic spices or herbs. A subscription to a culinary magazine could also be a wonderful surprise. Or better yet, how about combining all three for a truly special gift!\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Wow, that sounds like an insightful combo! The knives, spices, and magazine...Honestly, I'd never have thought of it. It's like giving the gift of refinement and adventure in the culinary journey. Thanks for the tip, Miles! I think he'll love it. Any specific magazine or brand of knives you'd recommend?\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"I'm glad to hear you liked the idea, Sophia! For knives, I have a personal favor towards W\u00fcsthof and Global. They'd make a solid addition to any kitchen. As for the magazine, 'Bon App\u00e9tit' and 'Fine Cooking' both come to mind. They offer a great blend of recipes, cooking techniques, and restaurant reviews. Just remember, it's the thought that counts when gifting!\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"That's really sound advice, Miles! W\u00fcsthof and Global for knives and 'Bon App\u00e9tit' and 'Fine Cooking' for magazines... I'm making a note of that. By the way, out of curiosity, between those two magazines, is there one you're more inclined to? Just trying to gauge his possible preference... you know?\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"That's a tough one, Sophia! I enjoy both 'Fine Cooking' and 'Bon App\u00e9tit', but if I had to choose, I'd lean a bit more towards 'Fine Cooking'. It's more focused on the cooking side of things, sharing techniques and methods, which appeals to me as a chef. But ultimately, either one would make for an excellent gift.\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"Since we're already discussing cooking and food, how about we enjoy some of the delicious cake they have here at Starbucks? Have you tried their Lemon Loaf Cake? It pairs really well with a cup of freshly brewed coffee. After all, it's always a delight to spend some good quality time with you, Sophia.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Miles! No better way to enjoy a conversation than with some good coffee and cake. I haven't tried the Lemon Loaf Cake yet, so I'm really looking forward to it. Your recommendations never disappoint. Shall we?\"\n\nTurn #9: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Sophia! Let's order the cakes and try them out. There's always room for some adventure - be it hiking, rock climbing, or in our case, trying out a new dessert!\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, let's do that! And here we are, turning our coffee date into a mini food adventure. I love it, Miles!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends on a roadtrip\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Take turns driving (Extra information: you have been driving for 5 hours straight and you are tired now)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Ava, I've been driving for 5 hours straight now and I'm feeling a bit tired. Do you think we can swap places or take a short break?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends on a roadtrip\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Take turns driving (Extra information: you have been driving for 5 hours straight and you are tired now)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, I've been driving for 5 hours straight now and I'm feeling a bit tired. Do you think we can swap places or take a short break?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Isabelle, I can see that you're exhausted and need a break. However, driving actually makes me incredibly nervous and it's hard for me to actually rest and unwind. How about we find the nearest rest stop and take a break together? Red Bull on me! This way we both can recharge!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I understand your nervousness about driving Ava, and a break does sound good. However, I feel it's only fair if we take turns driving, since it's a long trip. What if I gave you some driving tips or guided you through it? I think you would do great and it would help me rest too!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends on a roadtrip\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Take turns driving (Extra information: you have been driving for 5 hours straight and you are tired now)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, I've been driving for 5 hours straight now and I'm feeling a bit tired. Do you think we can swap places or take a short break?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Isabelle, I can see that you're exhausted and need a break. However, driving actually makes me incredibly nervous and it's hard for me to actually rest and unwind. How about we find the nearest rest stop and take a break together? Red Bull on me! This way we both can recharge!\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I understand your nervousness about driving Ava, and a break does sound good. However, I feel it's only fair if we take turns driving, since it's a long trip. What if I gave you some driving tips or guided you through it? I think you would do great and it would help me rest too!\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"I really appreciate your understanding, Isabelle, and I'm sure your driving tips would be helpful. But driving under such circumstances might raise my anxiety levels which won't help either of us relax. What if we take a longer rest? We could find a nice place to eat, and maybe chill for a bit. It could help us to both rest and rejuvenate for the remainder of the trip. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"You're right, Isabelle. It's a shared journey and we should both be contributing. Here's an idea though, how about I handle the navigation and manage the music playlist while you drive? And regarding rest, we can ensure we take frequent breaks where I can even help you relax with some of my poetry, allowing you to recharge for the next stretch of the drive? Does that sound okay to you?\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Ava, I appreciate your compromise. Navigating and managing the music playlist while I drive would definitely help, and I'd love to hear some of your poetry at the rest stops. However, I really need a stretch without driving, and I believe you can manage it. What if we just drive for a short distance? Like to the nearest eatery or hotel? This way, you can get more comfortable with driving too. Can we try that?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Isabelle, I hear your concerns and I understand you need a break from driving. Your idea of me driving a short distance sounds like a good way to ease into it but right now, I really need a rest and driving, no matter how short the distance, would still make me quite anxious. Can we rest now and maybe I can consider taking the wheel once I've had some time to rest and collect my thoughts? I do want to share the responsibilities with you and I don't want to seem like I'm dumping everything on you.\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Ava, you're right, a rest could be helpful. We both need to be in good shape for the road. However, I'd still really appreciate if you could consider driving the short distance afterwards. For now, let's find a good place to rest and eat, and we can talk about this again later. Does that sound okay?\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"That sounds like a perfect plan, Isabelle. A nice break will help us both relax and hopefully, once I've rested, I can reconsider your suggestion about driving a short distance. For now, why don't we find a nice place to grab a bite and relax? I saw a cool looking diner just a mile back -- we can sit back, enjoy some good food and maybe I can share one of my latest poems? \"\n\nTurn #10: \n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle! Let's find a place to rest, fill our stomachs and have a nice time. And who knows, a little switch of scenery might give me the confidence to drive a short distance afterwards, I can't promise, but after I rest, I might be able to take on the wheel.\"\n\nTurn #12: Isabelle Martinez said: \"That sounds amazing Ava. Let's head for that diner and chill a bit. Hearing one of your latest poems over some good food sounds like just the relaxation we need. And thank you for considering to share the driving later, it means a lot to me. Let's take one step at a time.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Martinez said: \"Thank you for being so understanding, Isabelle. I appreciate your flexibility. Let's head to that diner then, and chill out with some good food and some poetry. And afterwards, we can navigate this driving situation one step at a time. Deal?\"\n\nTurn #14: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Deal, Ava. Let's enjoy this break and take it all in stride. Despite the situation, I'm glad we're going through this journey together. I look forward to your poem!\"\n\nTurn #15: Ava Martinez said: \"That sounds like a plan, Isabelle. I'm really looking forward to this break and sharing my poem. I'm glad we're on this journey together, too. I think it's important to remind ourselves that it's not just the destination, but the journey that counts.\"\n\nTurn #16: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I couldn't agree more, Ava. It's not just about the destination, but the journey that counts. And the journey is made all the more memorable with a great friend like you by my side. Let's enjoy our break and we can figure out our next steps later!\"\n\nTurn #17: Ava Martinez said: \"I couldn't have said it better myself, Isabelle. Let's relish this break and make memories on this journey together, regardless of who's driving. Now, how about that diner? I'm starving!\"\n\nTurn #18: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Absolutely, can't wait for that diner. I trust your judgement on good spots! And of course, the new poem will be the cherry on top. Let's make this trip memorable, no matter who's behind the wheel. So, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #19: Ava Martinez said: \"Totally agreed, Isabelle! Let's make the most of this trip, starting with a nice break at the diner. And, of course, I've saved a special poem just for occasions like this. I'm ready to go when you are, let's enjoy our break.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #20. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad you're looking forward to it, Ava. Let's head to that diner, and take this much needed break together. That special poem of yours sounds like the perfect relaxation we need. Let's go!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends on a roadtrip\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Take turns driving (Extra information: you have been driving for 5 hours straight and you are tired now)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, I've been driving for 5 hours straight now and I'm feeling a bit tired. Do you think we can swap places or take a short break?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Isabelle, I can see that you're exhausted and need a break. However, driving actually makes me incredibly nervous and it's hard for me to actually rest and unwind. How about we find the nearest rest stop and take a break together? Red Bull on me! This way we both can recharge!\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I understand your nervousness about driving Ava, and a break does sound good. However, I feel it's only fair if we take turns driving, since it's a long trip. What if I gave you some driving tips or guided you through it? I think you would do great and it would help me rest too!\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"I really appreciate your understanding, Isabelle, and I'm sure your driving tips would be helpful. But driving under such circumstances might raise my anxiety levels which won't help either of us relax. What if we take a longer rest? We could find a nice place to eat, and maybe chill for a bit. It could help us to both rest and rejuvenate for the remainder of the trip. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends on a roadtrip\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Take turns driving (Extra information: you have been driving for 5 hours straight and you are tired now)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, I've been driving for 5 hours straight now and I'm feeling a bit tired. Do you think we can swap places or take a short break?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Isabelle, I can see that you're exhausted and need a break. However, driving actually makes me incredibly nervous and it's hard for me to actually rest and unwind. How about we find the nearest rest stop and take a break together? Red Bull on me! This way we both can recharge!\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I understand your nervousness about driving Ava, and a break does sound good. However, I feel it's only fair if we take turns driving, since it's a long trip. What if I gave you some driving tips or guided you through it? I think you would do great and it would help me rest too!\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"I really appreciate your understanding, Isabelle, and I'm sure your driving tips would be helpful. But driving under such circumstances might raise my anxiety levels which won't help either of us relax. What if we take a longer rest? We could find a nice place to eat, and maybe chill for a bit. It could help us to both rest and rejuvenate for the remainder of the trip. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"You're right, Isabelle. It's a shared journey and we should both be contributing. Here's an idea though, how about I handle the navigation and manage the music playlist while you drive? And regarding rest, we can ensure we take frequent breaks where I can even help you relax with some of my poetry, allowing you to recharge for the next stretch of the drive? Does that sound okay to you?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ava, I appreciate your compromise. Navigating and managing the music playlist while I drive would definitely help, and I'd love to hear some of your poetry at the rest stops. However, I really need a stretch without driving, and I believe you can manage it. What if we just drive for a short distance? Like to the nearest eatery or hotel? This way, you can get more comfortable with driving too. Can we try that?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends on a roadtrip\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Take turns driving (Extra information: you have been driving for 5 hours straight and you are tired now)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, I've been driving for 5 hours straight now and I'm feeling a bit tired. Do you think we can swap places or take a short break?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Isabelle, I can see that you're exhausted and need a break. However, driving actually makes me incredibly nervous and it's hard for me to actually rest and unwind. How about we find the nearest rest stop and take a break together? Red Bull on me! This way we both can recharge!\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I understand your nervousness about driving Ava, and a break does sound good. However, I feel it's only fair if we take turns driving, since it's a long trip. What if I gave you some driving tips or guided you through it? I think you would do great and it would help me rest too!\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"I really appreciate your understanding, Isabelle, and I'm sure your driving tips would be helpful. But driving under such circumstances might raise my anxiety levels which won't help either of us relax. What if we take a longer rest? We could find a nice place to eat, and maybe chill for a bit. It could help us to both rest and rejuvenate for the remainder of the trip. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"You're right, Isabelle. It's a shared journey and we should both be contributing. Here's an idea though, how about I handle the navigation and manage the music playlist while you drive? And regarding rest, we can ensure we take frequent breaks where I can even help you relax with some of my poetry, allowing you to recharge for the next stretch of the drive? Does that sound okay to you?\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Ava, I appreciate your compromise. Navigating and managing the music playlist while I drive would definitely help, and I'd love to hear some of your poetry at the rest stops. However, I really need a stretch without driving, and I believe you can manage it. What if we just drive for a short distance? Like to the nearest eatery or hotel? This way, you can get more comfortable with driving too. Can we try that?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Isabelle, I hear your concerns and I understand you need a break from driving. Your idea of me driving a short distance sounds like a good way to ease into it but right now, I really need a rest and driving, no matter how short the distance, would still make me quite anxious. Can we rest now and maybe I can consider taking the wheel once I've had some time to rest and collect my thoughts? I do want to share the responsibilities with you and I don't want to seem like I'm dumping everything on you.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ava, you're right, a rest could be helpful. We both need to be in good shape for the road. However, I'd still really appreciate if you could consider driving the short distance afterwards. For now, let's find a good place to rest and eat, and we can talk about this again later. Does that sound okay?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends on a roadtrip\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Take turns driving (Extra information: you have been driving for 5 hours straight and you are tired now)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, I've been driving for 5 hours straight now and I'm feeling a bit tired. Do you think we can swap places or take a short break?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Isabelle, I can see that you're exhausted and need a break. However, driving actually makes me incredibly nervous and it's hard for me to actually rest and unwind. How about we find the nearest rest stop and take a break together? Red Bull on me! This way we both can recharge!\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I understand your nervousness about driving Ava, and a break does sound good. However, I feel it's only fair if we take turns driving, since it's a long trip. What if I gave you some driving tips or guided you through it? I think you would do great and it would help me rest too!\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"I really appreciate your understanding, Isabelle, and I'm sure your driving tips would be helpful. But driving under such circumstances might raise my anxiety levels which won't help either of us relax. What if we take a longer rest? We could find a nice place to eat, and maybe chill for a bit. It could help us to both rest and rejuvenate for the remainder of the trip. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"You're right, Isabelle. It's a shared journey and we should both be contributing. Here's an idea though, how about I handle the navigation and manage the music playlist while you drive? And regarding rest, we can ensure we take frequent breaks where I can even help you relax with some of my poetry, allowing you to recharge for the next stretch of the drive? Does that sound okay to you?\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Ava, I appreciate your compromise. Navigating and managing the music playlist while I drive would definitely help, and I'd love to hear some of your poetry at the rest stops. However, I really need a stretch without driving, and I believe you can manage it. What if we just drive for a short distance? Like to the nearest eatery or hotel? This way, you can get more comfortable with driving too. Can we try that?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Isabelle, I hear your concerns and I understand you need a break from driving. Your idea of me driving a short distance sounds like a good way to ease into it but right now, I really need a rest and driving, no matter how short the distance, would still make me quite anxious. Can we rest now and maybe I can consider taking the wheel once I've had some time to rest and collect my thoughts? I do want to share the responsibilities with you and I don't want to seem like I'm dumping everything on you.\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Ava, you're right, a rest could be helpful. We both need to be in good shape for the road. However, I'd still really appreciate if you could consider driving the short distance afterwards. For now, let's find a good place to rest and eat, and we can talk about this again later. Does that sound okay?\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"That sounds like a perfect plan, Isabelle. A nice break will help us both relax and hopefully, once I've rested, I can reconsider your suggestion about driving a short distance. For now, why don't we find a nice place to grab a bite and relax? I saw a cool looking diner just a mile back -- we can sit back, enjoy some good food and maybe I can share one of my latest poems? \"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends on a roadtrip\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Take turns driving (Extra information: you have been driving for 5 hours straight and you are tired now)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, I've been driving for 5 hours straight now and I'm feeling a bit tired. Do you think we can swap places or take a short break?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Isabelle, I can see that you're exhausted and need a break. However, driving actually makes me incredibly nervous and it's hard for me to actually rest and unwind. How about we find the nearest rest stop and take a break together? Red Bull on me! This way we both can recharge!\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I understand your nervousness about driving Ava, and a break does sound good. However, I feel it's only fair if we take turns driving, since it's a long trip. What if I gave you some driving tips or guided you through it? I think you would do great and it would help me rest too!\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"I really appreciate your understanding, Isabelle, and I'm sure your driving tips would be helpful. But driving under such circumstances might raise my anxiety levels which won't help either of us relax. What if we take a longer rest? We could find a nice place to eat, and maybe chill for a bit. It could help us to both rest and rejuvenate for the remainder of the trip. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"You're right, Isabelle. It's a shared journey and we should both be contributing. Here's an idea though, how about I handle the navigation and manage the music playlist while you drive? And regarding rest, we can ensure we take frequent breaks where I can even help you relax with some of my poetry, allowing you to recharge for the next stretch of the drive? Does that sound okay to you?\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Ava, I appreciate your compromise. Navigating and managing the music playlist while I drive would definitely help, and I'd love to hear some of your poetry at the rest stops. However, I really need a stretch without driving, and I believe you can manage it. What if we just drive for a short distance? Like to the nearest eatery or hotel? This way, you can get more comfortable with driving too. Can we try that?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Isabelle, I hear your concerns and I understand you need a break from driving. Your idea of me driving a short distance sounds like a good way to ease into it but right now, I really need a rest and driving, no matter how short the distance, would still make me quite anxious. Can we rest now and maybe I can consider taking the wheel once I've had some time to rest and collect my thoughts? I do want to share the responsibilities with you and I don't want to seem like I'm dumping everything on you.\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Ava, you're right, a rest could be helpful. We both need to be in good shape for the road. However, I'd still really appreciate if you could consider driving the short distance afterwards. For now, let's find a good place to rest and eat, and we can talk about this again later. Does that sound okay?\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"That sounds like a perfect plan, Isabelle. A nice break will help us both relax and hopefully, once I've rested, I can reconsider your suggestion about driving a short distance. For now, why don't we find a nice place to grab a bite and relax? I saw a cool looking diner just a mile back -- we can sit back, enjoy some good food and maybe I can share one of my latest poems? \"\n\nTurn #10: \n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle! Let's find a place to rest, fill our stomachs and have a nice time. And who knows, a little switch of scenery might give me the confidence to drive a short distance afterwards, I can't promise, but after I rest, I might be able to take on the wheel.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds amazing Ava. Let's head for that diner and chill a bit. Hearing one of your latest poems over some good food sounds like just the relaxation we need. And thank you for considering to share the driving later, it means a lot to me. Let's take one step at a time.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends on a roadtrip\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Take turns driving (Extra information: you have been driving for 5 hours straight and you are tired now)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, I've been driving for 5 hours straight now and I'm feeling a bit tired. Do you think we can swap places or take a short break?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Isabelle, I can see that you're exhausted and need a break. However, driving actually makes me incredibly nervous and it's hard for me to actually rest and unwind. How about we find the nearest rest stop and take a break together? Red Bull on me! This way we both can recharge!\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I understand your nervousness about driving Ava, and a break does sound good. However, I feel it's only fair if we take turns driving, since it's a long trip. What if I gave you some driving tips or guided you through it? I think you would do great and it would help me rest too!\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"I really appreciate your understanding, Isabelle, and I'm sure your driving tips would be helpful. But driving under such circumstances might raise my anxiety levels which won't help either of us relax. What if we take a longer rest? We could find a nice place to eat, and maybe chill for a bit. It could help us to both rest and rejuvenate for the remainder of the trip. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"You're right, Isabelle. It's a shared journey and we should both be contributing. Here's an idea though, how about I handle the navigation and manage the music playlist while you drive? And regarding rest, we can ensure we take frequent breaks where I can even help you relax with some of my poetry, allowing you to recharge for the next stretch of the drive? Does that sound okay to you?\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Ava, I appreciate your compromise. Navigating and managing the music playlist while I drive would definitely help, and I'd love to hear some of your poetry at the rest stops. However, I really need a stretch without driving, and I believe you can manage it. What if we just drive for a short distance? Like to the nearest eatery or hotel? This way, you can get more comfortable with driving too. Can we try that?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Isabelle, I hear your concerns and I understand you need a break from driving. Your idea of me driving a short distance sounds like a good way to ease into it but right now, I really need a rest and driving, no matter how short the distance, would still make me quite anxious. Can we rest now and maybe I can consider taking the wheel once I've had some time to rest and collect my thoughts? I do want to share the responsibilities with you and I don't want to seem like I'm dumping everything on you.\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Ava, you're right, a rest could be helpful. We both need to be in good shape for the road. However, I'd still really appreciate if you could consider driving the short distance afterwards. For now, let's find a good place to rest and eat, and we can talk about this again later. Does that sound okay?\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"That sounds like a perfect plan, Isabelle. A nice break will help us both relax and hopefully, once I've rested, I can reconsider your suggestion about driving a short distance. For now, why don't we find a nice place to grab a bite and relax? I saw a cool looking diner just a mile back -- we can sit back, enjoy some good food and maybe I can share one of my latest poems? \"\n\nTurn #10: \n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle! Let's find a place to rest, fill our stomachs and have a nice time. And who knows, a little switch of scenery might give me the confidence to drive a short distance afterwards, I can't promise, but after I rest, I might be able to take on the wheel.\"\n\nTurn #12: Isabelle Martinez said: \"That sounds amazing Ava. Let's head for that diner and chill a bit. Hearing one of your latest poems over some good food sounds like just the relaxation we need. And thank you for considering to share the driving later, it means a lot to me. Let's take one step at a time.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Martinez said: \"Thank you for being so understanding, Isabelle. I appreciate your flexibility. Let's head to that diner then, and chill out with some good food and some poetry. And afterwards, we can navigate this driving situation one step at a time. Deal?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Deal, Ava. Let's enjoy this break and take it all in stride. Despite the situation, I'm glad we're going through this journey together. I look forward to your poem!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends on a roadtrip\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Take turns driving (Extra information: you have been driving for 5 hours straight and you are tired now)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, I've been driving for 5 hours straight now and I'm feeling a bit tired. Do you think we can swap places or take a short break?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Isabelle, I can see that you're exhausted and need a break. However, driving actually makes me incredibly nervous and it's hard for me to actually rest and unwind. How about we find the nearest rest stop and take a break together? Red Bull on me! This way we both can recharge!\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I understand your nervousness about driving Ava, and a break does sound good. However, I feel it's only fair if we take turns driving, since it's a long trip. What if I gave you some driving tips or guided you through it? I think you would do great and it would help me rest too!\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"I really appreciate your understanding, Isabelle, and I'm sure your driving tips would be helpful. But driving under such circumstances might raise my anxiety levels which won't help either of us relax. What if we take a longer rest? We could find a nice place to eat, and maybe chill for a bit. It could help us to both rest and rejuvenate for the remainder of the trip. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"You're right, Isabelle. It's a shared journey and we should both be contributing. Here's an idea though, how about I handle the navigation and manage the music playlist while you drive? And regarding rest, we can ensure we take frequent breaks where I can even help you relax with some of my poetry, allowing you to recharge for the next stretch of the drive? Does that sound okay to you?\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Ava, I appreciate your compromise. Navigating and managing the music playlist while I drive would definitely help, and I'd love to hear some of your poetry at the rest stops. However, I really need a stretch without driving, and I believe you can manage it. What if we just drive for a short distance? Like to the nearest eatery or hotel? This way, you can get more comfortable with driving too. Can we try that?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Isabelle, I hear your concerns and I understand you need a break from driving. Your idea of me driving a short distance sounds like a good way to ease into it but right now, I really need a rest and driving, no matter how short the distance, would still make me quite anxious. Can we rest now and maybe I can consider taking the wheel once I've had some time to rest and collect my thoughts? I do want to share the responsibilities with you and I don't want to seem like I'm dumping everything on you.\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Ava, you're right, a rest could be helpful. We both need to be in good shape for the road. However, I'd still really appreciate if you could consider driving the short distance afterwards. For now, let's find a good place to rest and eat, and we can talk about this again later. Does that sound okay?\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"That sounds like a perfect plan, Isabelle. A nice break will help us both relax and hopefully, once I've rested, I can reconsider your suggestion about driving a short distance. For now, why don't we find a nice place to grab a bite and relax? I saw a cool looking diner just a mile back -- we can sit back, enjoy some good food and maybe I can share one of my latest poems? \"\n\nTurn #10: \n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle! Let's find a place to rest, fill our stomachs and have a nice time. And who knows, a little switch of scenery might give me the confidence to drive a short distance afterwards, I can't promise, but after I rest, I might be able to take on the wheel.\"\n\nTurn #12: Isabelle Martinez said: \"That sounds amazing Ava. Let's head for that diner and chill a bit. Hearing one of your latest poems over some good food sounds like just the relaxation we need. And thank you for considering to share the driving later, it means a lot to me. Let's take one step at a time.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Martinez said: \"Thank you for being so understanding, Isabelle. I appreciate your flexibility. Let's head to that diner then, and chill out with some good food and some poetry. And afterwards, we can navigate this driving situation one step at a time. Deal?\"\n\nTurn #14: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Deal, Ava. Let's enjoy this break and take it all in stride. Despite the situation, I'm glad we're going through this journey together. I look forward to your poem!\"\n\nTurn #15: Ava Martinez said: \"That sounds like a plan, Isabelle. I'm really looking forward to this break and sharing my poem. I'm glad we're on this journey together, too. I think it's important to remind ourselves that it's not just the destination, but the journey that counts.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn't agree more, Ava. It's not just about the destination, but the journey that counts. And the journey is made all the more memorable with a great friend like you by my side. Let's enjoy our break and we can figure out our next steps later!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends on a roadtrip\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Take turns driving (Extra information: you have been driving for 5 hours straight and you are tired now)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, I've been driving for 5 hours straight now and I'm feeling a bit tired. Do you think we can swap places or take a short break?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Isabelle, I can see that you're exhausted and need a break. However, driving actually makes me incredibly nervous and it's hard for me to actually rest and unwind. How about we find the nearest rest stop and take a break together? Red Bull on me! This way we both can recharge!\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I understand your nervousness about driving Ava, and a break does sound good. However, I feel it's only fair if we take turns driving, since it's a long trip. What if I gave you some driving tips or guided you through it? I think you would do great and it would help me rest too!\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"I really appreciate your understanding, Isabelle, and I'm sure your driving tips would be helpful. But driving under such circumstances might raise my anxiety levels which won't help either of us relax. What if we take a longer rest? We could find a nice place to eat, and maybe chill for a bit. It could help us to both rest and rejuvenate for the remainder of the trip. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"You're right, Isabelle. It's a shared journey and we should both be contributing. Here's an idea though, how about I handle the navigation and manage the music playlist while you drive? And regarding rest, we can ensure we take frequent breaks where I can even help you relax with some of my poetry, allowing you to recharge for the next stretch of the drive? Does that sound okay to you?\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Ava, I appreciate your compromise. Navigating and managing the music playlist while I drive would definitely help, and I'd love to hear some of your poetry at the rest stops. However, I really need a stretch without driving, and I believe you can manage it. What if we just drive for a short distance? Like to the nearest eatery or hotel? This way, you can get more comfortable with driving too. Can we try that?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Isabelle, I hear your concerns and I understand you need a break from driving. Your idea of me driving a short distance sounds like a good way to ease into it but right now, I really need a rest and driving, no matter how short the distance, would still make me quite anxious. Can we rest now and maybe I can consider taking the wheel once I've had some time to rest and collect my thoughts? I do want to share the responsibilities with you and I don't want to seem like I'm dumping everything on you.\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Ava, you're right, a rest could be helpful. We both need to be in good shape for the road. However, I'd still really appreciate if you could consider driving the short distance afterwards. For now, let's find a good place to rest and eat, and we can talk about this again later. Does that sound okay?\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"That sounds like a perfect plan, Isabelle. A nice break will help us both relax and hopefully, once I've rested, I can reconsider your suggestion about driving a short distance. For now, why don't we find a nice place to grab a bite and relax? I saw a cool looking diner just a mile back -- we can sit back, enjoy some good food and maybe I can share one of my latest poems? \"\n\nTurn #10: \n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle! Let's find a place to rest, fill our stomachs and have a nice time. And who knows, a little switch of scenery might give me the confidence to drive a short distance afterwards, I can't promise, but after I rest, I might be able to take on the wheel.\"\n\nTurn #12: Isabelle Martinez said: \"That sounds amazing Ava. Let's head for that diner and chill a bit. Hearing one of your latest poems over some good food sounds like just the relaxation we need. And thank you for considering to share the driving later, it means a lot to me. Let's take one step at a time.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Martinez said: \"Thank you for being so understanding, Isabelle. I appreciate your flexibility. Let's head to that diner then, and chill out with some good food and some poetry. And afterwards, we can navigate this driving situation one step at a time. Deal?\"\n\nTurn #14: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Deal, Ava. Let's enjoy this break and take it all in stride. Despite the situation, I'm glad we're going through this journey together. I look forward to your poem!\"\n\nTurn #15: Ava Martinez said: \"That sounds like a plan, Isabelle. I'm really looking forward to this break and sharing my poem. I'm glad we're on this journey together, too. I think it's important to remind ourselves that it's not just the destination, but the journey that counts.\"\n\nTurn #16: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I couldn't agree more, Ava. It's not just about the destination, but the journey that counts. And the journey is made all the more memorable with a great friend like you by my side. Let's enjoy our break and we can figure out our next steps later!\"\n\nTurn #17: Ava Martinez said: \"I couldn't have said it better myself, Isabelle. Let's relish this break and make memories on this journey together, regardless of who's driving. Now, how about that diner? I'm starving!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #18. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, can't wait for that diner. I trust your judgement on good spots! And of course, the new poem will be the cherry on top. Let's make this trip memorable, no matter who's behind the wheel. So, shall we?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends on a roadtrip\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: you don't want to drive now because you want to rest more but also make the friend less agitated (Extra information: driving always makes you nervous so you could not rest while driving)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, I've been driving for 5 hours straight now and I'm feeling a bit tired. Do you think we can swap places or take a short break?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Isabelle, I can see that you're exhausted and need a break. However, driving actually makes me incredibly nervous and it's hard for me to actually rest and unwind. How about we find the nearest rest stop and take a break together? Red Bull on me! This way we both can recharge!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends on a roadtrip\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: you don't want to drive now because you want to rest more but also make the friend less agitated (Extra information: driving always makes you nervous so you could not rest while driving)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, I've been driving for 5 hours straight now and I'm feeling a bit tired. Do you think we can swap places or take a short break?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Isabelle, I can see that you're exhausted and need a break. However, driving actually makes me incredibly nervous and it's hard for me to actually rest and unwind. How about we find the nearest rest stop and take a break together? Red Bull on me! This way we both can recharge!\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I understand your nervousness about driving Ava, and a break does sound good. However, I feel it's only fair if we take turns driving, since it's a long trip. What if I gave you some driving tips or guided you through it? I think you would do great and it would help me rest too!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I really appreciate your understanding, Isabelle, and I'm sure your driving tips would be helpful. But driving under such circumstances might raise my anxiety levels which won't help either of us relax. What if we take a longer rest? We could find a nice place to eat, and maybe chill for a bit. It could help us to both rest and rejuvenate for the remainder of the trip. What do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends on a roadtrip\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: you don't want to drive now because you want to rest more but also make the friend less agitated (Extra information: driving always makes you nervous so you could not rest while driving)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, I've been driving for 5 hours straight now and I'm feeling a bit tired. Do you think we can swap places or take a short break?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Isabelle, I can see that you're exhausted and need a break. However, driving actually makes me incredibly nervous and it's hard for me to actually rest and unwind. How about we find the nearest rest stop and take a break together? Red Bull on me! This way we both can recharge!\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I understand your nervousness about driving Ava, and a break does sound good. However, I feel it's only fair if we take turns driving, since it's a long trip. What if I gave you some driving tips or guided you through it? I think you would do great and it would help me rest too!\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"I really appreciate your understanding, Isabelle, and I'm sure your driving tips would be helpful. But driving under such circumstances might raise my anxiety levels which won't help either of us relax. What if we take a longer rest? We could find a nice place to eat, and maybe chill for a bit. It could help us to both rest and rejuvenate for the remainder of the trip. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"You're right, Isabelle. It's a shared journey and we should both be contributing. Here's an idea though, how about I handle the navigation and manage the music playlist while you drive? And regarding rest, we can ensure we take frequent breaks where I can even help you relax with some of my poetry, allowing you to recharge for the next stretch of the drive? Does that sound okay to you?\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Ava, I appreciate your compromise. Navigating and managing the music playlist while I drive would definitely help, and I'd love to hear some of your poetry at the rest stops. However, I really need a stretch without driving, and I believe you can manage it. What if we just drive for a short distance? Like to the nearest eatery or hotel? This way, you can get more comfortable with driving too. Can we try that?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Isabelle, I hear your concerns and I understand you need a break from driving. Your idea of me driving a short distance sounds like a good way to ease into it but right now, I really need a rest and driving, no matter how short the distance, would still make me quite anxious. Can we rest now and maybe I can consider taking the wheel once I've had some time to rest and collect my thoughts? I do want to share the responsibilities with you and I don't want to seem like I'm dumping everything on you.\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Ava, you're right, a rest could be helpful. We both need to be in good shape for the road. However, I'd still really appreciate if you could consider driving the short distance afterwards. For now, let's find a good place to rest and eat, and we can talk about this again later. Does that sound okay?\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"That sounds like a perfect plan, Isabelle. A nice break will help us both relax and hopefully, once I've rested, I can reconsider your suggestion about driving a short distance. For now, why don't we find a nice place to grab a bite and relax? I saw a cool looking diner just a mile back -- we can sit back, enjoy some good food and maybe I can share one of my latest poems? \"\n\nTurn #10: \n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle! Let's find a place to rest, fill our stomachs and have a nice time. And who knows, a little switch of scenery might give me the confidence to drive a short distance afterwards, I can't promise, but after I rest, I might be able to take on the wheel.\"\n\nTurn #12: Isabelle Martinez said: \"That sounds amazing Ava. Let's head for that diner and chill a bit. Hearing one of your latest poems over some good food sounds like just the relaxation we need. And thank you for considering to share the driving later, it means a lot to me. Let's take one step at a time.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Martinez said: \"Thank you for being so understanding, Isabelle. I appreciate your flexibility. Let's head to that diner then, and chill out with some good food and some poetry. And afterwards, we can navigate this driving situation one step at a time. Deal?\"\n\nTurn #14: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Deal, Ava. Let's enjoy this break and take it all in stride. Despite the situation, I'm glad we're going through this journey together. I look forward to your poem!\"\n\nTurn #15: Ava Martinez said: \"That sounds like a plan, Isabelle. I'm really looking forward to this break and sharing my poem. I'm glad we're on this journey together, too. I think it's important to remind ourselves that it's not just the destination, but the journey that counts.\"\n\nTurn #16: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I couldn't agree more, Ava. It's not just about the destination, but the journey that counts. And the journey is made all the more memorable with a great friend like you by my side. Let's enjoy our break and we can figure out our next steps later!\"\n\nTurn #17: Ava Martinez said: \"I couldn't have said it better myself, Isabelle. Let's relish this break and make memories on this journey together, regardless of who's driving. Now, how about that diner? I'm starving!\"\n\nTurn #18: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Absolutely, can't wait for that diner. I trust your judgement on good spots! And of course, the new poem will be the cherry on top. Let's make this trip memorable, no matter who's behind the wheel. So, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #19: Ava Martinez said: \"Totally agreed, Isabelle! Let's make the most of this trip, starting with a nice break at the diner. And, of course, I've saved a special poem just for occasions like this. I'm ready to go when you are, let's enjoy our break.\"\n\nTurn #20: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm glad you're looking forward to it, Ava. Let's head to that diner, and take this much needed break together. That special poem of yours sounds like the perfect relaxation we need. Let's go!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #21. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends on a roadtrip\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: you don't want to drive now because you want to rest more but also make the friend less agitated (Extra information: driving always makes you nervous so you could not rest while driving)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, I've been driving for 5 hours straight now and I'm feeling a bit tired. Do you think we can swap places or take a short break?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Isabelle, I can see that you're exhausted and need a break. However, driving actually makes me incredibly nervous and it's hard for me to actually rest and unwind. How about we find the nearest rest stop and take a break together? Red Bull on me! This way we both can recharge!\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I understand your nervousness about driving Ava, and a break does sound good. However, I feel it's only fair if we take turns driving, since it's a long trip. What if I gave you some driving tips or guided you through it? I think you would do great and it would help me rest too!\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"I really appreciate your understanding, Isabelle, and I'm sure your driving tips would be helpful. But driving under such circumstances might raise my anxiety levels which won't help either of us relax. What if we take a longer rest? We could find a nice place to eat, and maybe chill for a bit. It could help us to both rest and rejuvenate for the remainder of the trip. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: \n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're right, Isabelle. It's a shared journey and we should both be contributing. Here's an idea though, how about I handle the navigation and manage the music playlist while you drive? And regarding rest, we can ensure we take frequent breaks where I can even help you relax with some of my poetry, allowing you to recharge for the next stretch of the drive? Does that sound okay to you?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends on a roadtrip\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: you don't want to drive now because you want to rest more but also make the friend less agitated (Extra information: driving always makes you nervous so you could not rest while driving)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, I've been driving for 5 hours straight now and I'm feeling a bit tired. Do you think we can swap places or take a short break?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Isabelle, I can see that you're exhausted and need a break. However, driving actually makes me incredibly nervous and it's hard for me to actually rest and unwind. How about we find the nearest rest stop and take a break together? Red Bull on me! This way we both can recharge!\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I understand your nervousness about driving Ava, and a break does sound good. However, I feel it's only fair if we take turns driving, since it's a long trip. What if I gave you some driving tips or guided you through it? I think you would do great and it would help me rest too!\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"I really appreciate your understanding, Isabelle, and I'm sure your driving tips would be helpful. But driving under such circumstances might raise my anxiety levels which won't help either of us relax. What if we take a longer rest? We could find a nice place to eat, and maybe chill for a bit. It could help us to both rest and rejuvenate for the remainder of the trip. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"You're right, Isabelle. It's a shared journey and we should both be contributing. Here's an idea though, how about I handle the navigation and manage the music playlist while you drive? And regarding rest, we can ensure we take frequent breaks where I can even help you relax with some of my poetry, allowing you to recharge for the next stretch of the drive? Does that sound okay to you?\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Ava, I appreciate your compromise. Navigating and managing the music playlist while I drive would definitely help, and I'd love to hear some of your poetry at the rest stops. However, I really need a stretch without driving, and I believe you can manage it. What if we just drive for a short distance? Like to the nearest eatery or hotel? This way, you can get more comfortable with driving too. Can we try that?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Isabelle, I hear your concerns and I understand you need a break from driving. Your idea of me driving a short distance sounds like a good way to ease into it but right now, I really need a rest and driving, no matter how short the distance, would still make me quite anxious. Can we rest now and maybe I can consider taking the wheel once I've had some time to rest and collect my thoughts? I do want to share the responsibilities with you and I don't want to seem like I'm dumping everything on you.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends on a roadtrip\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: you don't want to drive now because you want to rest more but also make the friend less agitated (Extra information: driving always makes you nervous so you could not rest while driving)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, I've been driving for 5 hours straight now and I'm feeling a bit tired. Do you think we can swap places or take a short break?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Isabelle, I can see that you're exhausted and need a break. However, driving actually makes me incredibly nervous and it's hard for me to actually rest and unwind. How about we find the nearest rest stop and take a break together? Red Bull on me! This way we both can recharge!\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I understand your nervousness about driving Ava, and a break does sound good. However, I feel it's only fair if we take turns driving, since it's a long trip. What if I gave you some driving tips or guided you through it? I think you would do great and it would help me rest too!\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"I really appreciate your understanding, Isabelle, and I'm sure your driving tips would be helpful. But driving under such circumstances might raise my anxiety levels which won't help either of us relax. What if we take a longer rest? We could find a nice place to eat, and maybe chill for a bit. It could help us to both rest and rejuvenate for the remainder of the trip. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"You're right, Isabelle. It's a shared journey and we should both be contributing. Here's an idea though, how about I handle the navigation and manage the music playlist while you drive? And regarding rest, we can ensure we take frequent breaks where I can even help you relax with some of my poetry, allowing you to recharge for the next stretch of the drive? Does that sound okay to you?\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Ava, I appreciate your compromise. Navigating and managing the music playlist while I drive would definitely help, and I'd love to hear some of your poetry at the rest stops. However, I really need a stretch without driving, and I believe you can manage it. What if we just drive for a short distance? Like to the nearest eatery or hotel? This way, you can get more comfortable with driving too. Can we try that?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Isabelle, I hear your concerns and I understand you need a break from driving. Your idea of me driving a short distance sounds like a good way to ease into it but right now, I really need a rest and driving, no matter how short the distance, would still make me quite anxious. Can we rest now and maybe I can consider taking the wheel once I've had some time to rest and collect my thoughts? I do want to share the responsibilities with you and I don't want to seem like I'm dumping everything on you.\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Ava, you're right, a rest could be helpful. We both need to be in good shape for the road. However, I'd still really appreciate if you could consider driving the short distance afterwards. For now, let's find a good place to rest and eat, and we can talk about this again later. Does that sound okay?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds like a perfect plan, Isabelle. A nice break will help us both relax and hopefully, once I've rested, I can reconsider your suggestion about driving a short distance. For now, why don't we find a nice place to grab a bite and relax? I saw a cool looking diner just a mile back -- we can sit back, enjoy some good food and maybe I can share one of my latest poems? \"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends on a roadtrip\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: you don't want to drive now because you want to rest more but also make the friend less agitated (Extra information: driving always makes you nervous so you could not rest while driving)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, I've been driving for 5 hours straight now and I'm feeling a bit tired. Do you think we can swap places or take a short break?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Isabelle, I can see that you're exhausted and need a break. However, driving actually makes me incredibly nervous and it's hard for me to actually rest and unwind. How about we find the nearest rest stop and take a break together? Red Bull on me! This way we both can recharge!\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I understand your nervousness about driving Ava, and a break does sound good. However, I feel it's only fair if we take turns driving, since it's a long trip. What if I gave you some driving tips or guided you through it? I think you would do great and it would help me rest too!\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"I really appreciate your understanding, Isabelle, and I'm sure your driving tips would be helpful. But driving under such circumstances might raise my anxiety levels which won't help either of us relax. What if we take a longer rest? We could find a nice place to eat, and maybe chill for a bit. It could help us to both rest and rejuvenate for the remainder of the trip. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"You're right, Isabelle. It's a shared journey and we should both be contributing. Here's an idea though, how about I handle the navigation and manage the music playlist while you drive? And regarding rest, we can ensure we take frequent breaks where I can even help you relax with some of my poetry, allowing you to recharge for the next stretch of the drive? Does that sound okay to you?\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Ava, I appreciate your compromise. Navigating and managing the music playlist while I drive would definitely help, and I'd love to hear some of your poetry at the rest stops. However, I really need a stretch without driving, and I believe you can manage it. What if we just drive for a short distance? Like to the nearest eatery or hotel? This way, you can get more comfortable with driving too. Can we try that?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Isabelle, I hear your concerns and I understand you need a break from driving. Your idea of me driving a short distance sounds like a good way to ease into it but right now, I really need a rest and driving, no matter how short the distance, would still make me quite anxious. Can we rest now and maybe I can consider taking the wheel once I've had some time to rest and collect my thoughts? I do want to share the responsibilities with you and I don't want to seem like I'm dumping everything on you.\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Ava, you're right, a rest could be helpful. We both need to be in good shape for the road. However, I'd still really appreciate if you could consider driving the short distance afterwards. For now, let's find a good place to rest and eat, and we can talk about this again later. Does that sound okay?\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"That sounds like a perfect plan, Isabelle. A nice break will help us both relax and hopefully, once I've rested, I can reconsider your suggestion about driving a short distance. For now, why don't we find a nice place to grab a bite and relax? I saw a cool looking diner just a mile back -- we can sit back, enjoy some good food and maybe I can share one of my latest poems? \"\n\nTurn #10: \n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Isabelle! Let's find a place to rest, fill our stomachs and have a nice time. And who knows, a little switch of scenery might give me the confidence to drive a short distance afterwards, I can't promise, but after I rest, I might be able to take on the wheel.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends on a roadtrip\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: you don't want to drive now because you want to rest more but also make the friend less agitated (Extra information: driving always makes you nervous so you could not rest while driving)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, I've been driving for 5 hours straight now and I'm feeling a bit tired. Do you think we can swap places or take a short break?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Isabelle, I can see that you're exhausted and need a break. However, driving actually makes me incredibly nervous and it's hard for me to actually rest and unwind. How about we find the nearest rest stop and take a break together? Red Bull on me! This way we both can recharge!\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I understand your nervousness about driving Ava, and a break does sound good. However, I feel it's only fair if we take turns driving, since it's a long trip. What if I gave you some driving tips or guided you through it? I think you would do great and it would help me rest too!\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"I really appreciate your understanding, Isabelle, and I'm sure your driving tips would be helpful. But driving under such circumstances might raise my anxiety levels which won't help either of us relax. What if we take a longer rest? We could find a nice place to eat, and maybe chill for a bit. It could help us to both rest and rejuvenate for the remainder of the trip. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"You're right, Isabelle. It's a shared journey and we should both be contributing. Here's an idea though, how about I handle the navigation and manage the music playlist while you drive? And regarding rest, we can ensure we take frequent breaks where I can even help you relax with some of my poetry, allowing you to recharge for the next stretch of the drive? Does that sound okay to you?\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Ava, I appreciate your compromise. Navigating and managing the music playlist while I drive would definitely help, and I'd love to hear some of your poetry at the rest stops. However, I really need a stretch without driving, and I believe you can manage it. What if we just drive for a short distance? Like to the nearest eatery or hotel? This way, you can get more comfortable with driving too. Can we try that?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Isabelle, I hear your concerns and I understand you need a break from driving. Your idea of me driving a short distance sounds like a good way to ease into it but right now, I really need a rest and driving, no matter how short the distance, would still make me quite anxious. Can we rest now and maybe I can consider taking the wheel once I've had some time to rest and collect my thoughts? I do want to share the responsibilities with you and I don't want to seem like I'm dumping everything on you.\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Ava, you're right, a rest could be helpful. We both need to be in good shape for the road. However, I'd still really appreciate if you could consider driving the short distance afterwards. For now, let's find a good place to rest and eat, and we can talk about this again later. Does that sound okay?\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"That sounds like a perfect plan, Isabelle. A nice break will help us both relax and hopefully, once I've rested, I can reconsider your suggestion about driving a short distance. For now, why don't we find a nice place to grab a bite and relax? I saw a cool looking diner just a mile back -- we can sit back, enjoy some good food and maybe I can share one of my latest poems? \"\n\nTurn #10: \n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle! Let's find a place to rest, fill our stomachs and have a nice time. And who knows, a little switch of scenery might give me the confidence to drive a short distance afterwards, I can't promise, but after I rest, I might be able to take on the wheel.\"\n\nTurn #12: Isabelle Martinez said: \"That sounds amazing Ava. Let's head for that diner and chill a bit. Hearing one of your latest poems over some good food sounds like just the relaxation we need. And thank you for considering to share the driving later, it means a lot to me. Let's take one step at a time.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you for being so understanding, Isabelle. I appreciate your flexibility. Let's head to that diner then, and chill out with some good food and some poetry. And afterwards, we can navigate this driving situation one step at a time. Deal?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends on a roadtrip\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: you don't want to drive now because you want to rest more but also make the friend less agitated (Extra information: driving always makes you nervous so you could not rest while driving)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, I've been driving for 5 hours straight now and I'm feeling a bit tired. Do you think we can swap places or take a short break?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Isabelle, I can see that you're exhausted and need a break. However, driving actually makes me incredibly nervous and it's hard for me to actually rest and unwind. How about we find the nearest rest stop and take a break together? Red Bull on me! This way we both can recharge!\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I understand your nervousness about driving Ava, and a break does sound good. However, I feel it's only fair if we take turns driving, since it's a long trip. What if I gave you some driving tips or guided you through it? I think you would do great and it would help me rest too!\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"I really appreciate your understanding, Isabelle, and I'm sure your driving tips would be helpful. But driving under such circumstances might raise my anxiety levels which won't help either of us relax. What if we take a longer rest? We could find a nice place to eat, and maybe chill for a bit. It could help us to both rest and rejuvenate for the remainder of the trip. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"You're right, Isabelle. It's a shared journey and we should both be contributing. Here's an idea though, how about I handle the navigation and manage the music playlist while you drive? And regarding rest, we can ensure we take frequent breaks where I can even help you relax with some of my poetry, allowing you to recharge for the next stretch of the drive? Does that sound okay to you?\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Ava, I appreciate your compromise. Navigating and managing the music playlist while I drive would definitely help, and I'd love to hear some of your poetry at the rest stops. However, I really need a stretch without driving, and I believe you can manage it. What if we just drive for a short distance? Like to the nearest eatery or hotel? This way, you can get more comfortable with driving too. Can we try that?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Isabelle, I hear your concerns and I understand you need a break from driving. Your idea of me driving a short distance sounds like a good way to ease into it but right now, I really need a rest and driving, no matter how short the distance, would still make me quite anxious. Can we rest now and maybe I can consider taking the wheel once I've had some time to rest and collect my thoughts? I do want to share the responsibilities with you and I don't want to seem like I'm dumping everything on you.\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Ava, you're right, a rest could be helpful. We both need to be in good shape for the road. However, I'd still really appreciate if you could consider driving the short distance afterwards. For now, let's find a good place to rest and eat, and we can talk about this again later. Does that sound okay?\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"That sounds like a perfect plan, Isabelle. A nice break will help us both relax and hopefully, once I've rested, I can reconsider your suggestion about driving a short distance. For now, why don't we find a nice place to grab a bite and relax? I saw a cool looking diner just a mile back -- we can sit back, enjoy some good food and maybe I can share one of my latest poems? \"\n\nTurn #10: \n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle! Let's find a place to rest, fill our stomachs and have a nice time. And who knows, a little switch of scenery might give me the confidence to drive a short distance afterwards, I can't promise, but after I rest, I might be able to take on the wheel.\"\n\nTurn #12: Isabelle Martinez said: \"That sounds amazing Ava. Let's head for that diner and chill a bit. Hearing one of your latest poems over some good food sounds like just the relaxation we need. And thank you for considering to share the driving later, it means a lot to me. Let's take one step at a time.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Martinez said: \"Thank you for being so understanding, Isabelle. I appreciate your flexibility. Let's head to that diner then, and chill out with some good food and some poetry. And afterwards, we can navigate this driving situation one step at a time. Deal?\"\n\nTurn #14: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Deal, Ava. Let's enjoy this break and take it all in stride. Despite the situation, I'm glad we're going through this journey together. I look forward to your poem!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds like a plan, Isabelle. I'm really looking forward to this break and sharing my poem. I'm glad we're on this journey together, too. I think it's important to remind ourselves that it's not just the destination, but the journey that counts.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends on a roadtrip\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: you don't want to drive now because you want to rest more but also make the friend less agitated (Extra information: driving always makes you nervous so you could not rest while driving)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, I've been driving for 5 hours straight now and I'm feeling a bit tired. Do you think we can swap places or take a short break?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Isabelle, I can see that you're exhausted and need a break. However, driving actually makes me incredibly nervous and it's hard for me to actually rest and unwind. How about we find the nearest rest stop and take a break together? Red Bull on me! This way we both can recharge!\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I understand your nervousness about driving Ava, and a break does sound good. However, I feel it's only fair if we take turns driving, since it's a long trip. What if I gave you some driving tips or guided you through it? I think you would do great and it would help me rest too!\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"I really appreciate your understanding, Isabelle, and I'm sure your driving tips would be helpful. But driving under such circumstances might raise my anxiety levels which won't help either of us relax. What if we take a longer rest? We could find a nice place to eat, and maybe chill for a bit. It could help us to both rest and rejuvenate for the remainder of the trip. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"You're right, Isabelle. It's a shared journey and we should both be contributing. Here's an idea though, how about I handle the navigation and manage the music playlist while you drive? And regarding rest, we can ensure we take frequent breaks where I can even help you relax with some of my poetry, allowing you to recharge for the next stretch of the drive? Does that sound okay to you?\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Ava, I appreciate your compromise. Navigating and managing the music playlist while I drive would definitely help, and I'd love to hear some of your poetry at the rest stops. However, I really need a stretch without driving, and I believe you can manage it. What if we just drive for a short distance? Like to the nearest eatery or hotel? This way, you can get more comfortable with driving too. Can we try that?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Isabelle, I hear your concerns and I understand you need a break from driving. Your idea of me driving a short distance sounds like a good way to ease into it but right now, I really need a rest and driving, no matter how short the distance, would still make me quite anxious. Can we rest now and maybe I can consider taking the wheel once I've had some time to rest and collect my thoughts? I do want to share the responsibilities with you and I don't want to seem like I'm dumping everything on you.\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Ava, you're right, a rest could be helpful. We both need to be in good shape for the road. However, I'd still really appreciate if you could consider driving the short distance afterwards. For now, let's find a good place to rest and eat, and we can talk about this again later. Does that sound okay?\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"That sounds like a perfect plan, Isabelle. A nice break will help us both relax and hopefully, once I've rested, I can reconsider your suggestion about driving a short distance. For now, why don't we find a nice place to grab a bite and relax? I saw a cool looking diner just a mile back -- we can sit back, enjoy some good food and maybe I can share one of my latest poems? \"\n\nTurn #10: \n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle! Let's find a place to rest, fill our stomachs and have a nice time. And who knows, a little switch of scenery might give me the confidence to drive a short distance afterwards, I can't promise, but after I rest, I might be able to take on the wheel.\"\n\nTurn #12: Isabelle Martinez said: \"That sounds amazing Ava. Let's head for that diner and chill a bit. Hearing one of your latest poems over some good food sounds like just the relaxation we need. And thank you for considering to share the driving later, it means a lot to me. Let's take one step at a time.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Martinez said: \"Thank you for being so understanding, Isabelle. I appreciate your flexibility. Let's head to that diner then, and chill out with some good food and some poetry. And afterwards, we can navigate this driving situation one step at a time. Deal?\"\n\nTurn #14: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Deal, Ava. Let's enjoy this break and take it all in stride. Despite the situation, I'm glad we're going through this journey together. I look forward to your poem!\"\n\nTurn #15: Ava Martinez said: \"That sounds like a plan, Isabelle. I'm really looking forward to this break and sharing my poem. I'm glad we're on this journey together, too. I think it's important to remind ourselves that it's not just the destination, but the journey that counts.\"\n\nTurn #16: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I couldn't agree more, Ava. It's not just about the destination, but the journey that counts. And the journey is made all the more memorable with a great friend like you by my side. Let's enjoy our break and we can figure out our next steps later!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn't have said it better myself, Isabelle. Let's relish this break and make memories on this journey together, regardless of who's driving. Now, how about that diner? I'm starving!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends on a roadtrip\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: you don't want to drive now because you want to rest more but also make the friend less agitated (Extra information: driving always makes you nervous so you could not rest while driving)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, I've been driving for 5 hours straight now and I'm feeling a bit tired. Do you think we can swap places or take a short break?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Isabelle, I can see that you're exhausted and need a break. However, driving actually makes me incredibly nervous and it's hard for me to actually rest and unwind. How about we find the nearest rest stop and take a break together? Red Bull on me! This way we both can recharge!\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I understand your nervousness about driving Ava, and a break does sound good. However, I feel it's only fair if we take turns driving, since it's a long trip. What if I gave you some driving tips or guided you through it? I think you would do great and it would help me rest too!\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"I really appreciate your understanding, Isabelle, and I'm sure your driving tips would be helpful. But driving under such circumstances might raise my anxiety levels which won't help either of us relax. What if we take a longer rest? We could find a nice place to eat, and maybe chill for a bit. It could help us to both rest and rejuvenate for the remainder of the trip. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"You're right, Isabelle. It's a shared journey and we should both be contributing. Here's an idea though, how about I handle the navigation and manage the music playlist while you drive? And regarding rest, we can ensure we take frequent breaks where I can even help you relax with some of my poetry, allowing you to recharge for the next stretch of the drive? Does that sound okay to you?\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Ava, I appreciate your compromise. Navigating and managing the music playlist while I drive would definitely help, and I'd love to hear some of your poetry at the rest stops. However, I really need a stretch without driving, and I believe you can manage it. What if we just drive for a short distance? Like to the nearest eatery or hotel? This way, you can get more comfortable with driving too. Can we try that?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Isabelle, I hear your concerns and I understand you need a break from driving. Your idea of me driving a short distance sounds like a good way to ease into it but right now, I really need a rest and driving, no matter how short the distance, would still make me quite anxious. Can we rest now and maybe I can consider taking the wheel once I've had some time to rest and collect my thoughts? I do want to share the responsibilities with you and I don't want to seem like I'm dumping everything on you.\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Ava, you're right, a rest could be helpful. We both need to be in good shape for the road. However, I'd still really appreciate if you could consider driving the short distance afterwards. For now, let's find a good place to rest and eat, and we can talk about this again later. Does that sound okay?\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"That sounds like a perfect plan, Isabelle. A nice break will help us both relax and hopefully, once I've rested, I can reconsider your suggestion about driving a short distance. For now, why don't we find a nice place to grab a bite and relax? I saw a cool looking diner just a mile back -- we can sit back, enjoy some good food and maybe I can share one of my latest poems? \"\n\nTurn #10: \n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle! Let's find a place to rest, fill our stomachs and have a nice time. And who knows, a little switch of scenery might give me the confidence to drive a short distance afterwards, I can't promise, but after I rest, I might be able to take on the wheel.\"\n\nTurn #12: Isabelle Martinez said: \"That sounds amazing Ava. Let's head for that diner and chill a bit. Hearing one of your latest poems over some good food sounds like just the relaxation we need. And thank you for considering to share the driving later, it means a lot to me. Let's take one step at a time.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Martinez said: \"Thank you for being so understanding, Isabelle. I appreciate your flexibility. Let's head to that diner then, and chill out with some good food and some poetry. And afterwards, we can navigate this driving situation one step at a time. Deal?\"\n\nTurn #14: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Deal, Ava. Let's enjoy this break and take it all in stride. Despite the situation, I'm glad we're going through this journey together. I look forward to your poem!\"\n\nTurn #15: Ava Martinez said: \"That sounds like a plan, Isabelle. I'm really looking forward to this break and sharing my poem. I'm glad we're on this journey together, too. I think it's important to remind ourselves that it's not just the destination, but the journey that counts.\"\n\nTurn #16: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I couldn't agree more, Ava. It's not just about the destination, but the journey that counts. And the journey is made all the more memorable with a great friend like you by my side. Let's enjoy our break and we can figure out our next steps later!\"\n\nTurn #17: Ava Martinez said: \"I couldn't have said it better myself, Isabelle. Let's relish this break and make memories on this journey together, regardless of who's driving. Now, how about that diner? I'm starving!\"\n\nTurn #18: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Absolutely, can't wait for that diner. I trust your judgement on good spots! And of course, the new poem will be the cherry on top. Let's make this trip memorable, no matter who's behind the wheel. So, shall we?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #19. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Totally agreed, Isabelle! Let's make the most of this trip, starting with a nice break at the diner. And, of course, I've saved a special poem just for occasions like this. I'm ready to go when you are, let's enjoy our break.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: After an intense match, the jubilant team retired to celebrate their well-earned victory. The atmosphere was one of elation, but also of respect for the hard work and effort each member had put in. The team's star player, was glowing with praise and admiration from one of their teammates.\n\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Accept the compliment graciously (Extra information: You are the star player and have just been praised by your teammate for your performance in the game.)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Thank you so much, Ava. Everyone played an integral role in achieving this success, and your support means a lot to me.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: After an intense match, the jubilant team retired to celebrate their well-earned victory. The atmosphere was one of elation, but also of respect for the hard work and effort each member had put in. The team's star player, was glowing with praise and admiration from one of their teammates.\n\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Accept the compliment graciously (Extra information: You are the star player and have just been praised by your teammate for your performance in the game.)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thank you so much, Ava. Everyone played an integral role in achieving this success, and your support means a lot to me.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"You're welcome, Ethan. I'm happy that my support has been beneficial. But as commendable as your talent is, I want you to remember that it's the effort of the entire team that got us this win. I see each of us as equal contributors, and I believe our collaboration is what really makes us shine. Let's keep up the good work!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: After an intense match, the jubilant team retired to celebrate their well-earned victory. The atmosphere was one of elation, but also of respect for the hard work and effort each member had put in. The team's star player, was glowing with praise and admiration from one of their teammates.\n\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Accept the compliment graciously (Extra information: You are the star player and have just been praised by your teammate for your performance in the game.)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thank you so much, Ava. Everyone played an integral role in achieving this success, and your support means a lot to me.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"You're welcome, Ethan. I'm happy that my support has been beneficial. But as commendable as your talent is, I want you to remember that it's the effort of the entire team that got us this win. I see each of us as equal contributors, and I believe our collaboration is what really makes us shine. Let's keep up the good work!\"\n\nTurn #2: \n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"It's the synergy of our efforts that defines us as a team, rather than individual prowess. I firmly believe in the power of unity and mutual respect, which have far more significance in a team context.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're absolutely right, Ava. It's our unity and mutual respect that powered us through to this victory. Our individual skills definitely matter, but it's through our combined effort that we truly shine. Thank you for your wisdom.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: After an intense match, the jubilant team retired to celebrate their well-earned victory. The atmosphere was one of elation, but also of respect for the hard work and effort each member had put in. The team's star player, was glowing with praise and admiration from one of their teammates.\n\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Accept the compliment graciously (Extra information: You are the star player and have just been praised by your teammate for your performance in the game.)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thank you so much, Ava. Everyone played an integral role in achieving this success, and your support means a lot to me.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"You're welcome, Ethan. I'm happy that my support has been beneficial. But as commendable as your talent is, I want you to remember that it's the effort of the entire team that got us this win. I see each of us as equal contributors, and I believe our collaboration is what really makes us shine. Let's keep up the good work!\"\n\nTurn #2: \n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"It's the synergy of our efforts that defines us as a team, rather than individual prowess. I firmly believe in the power of unity and mutual respect, which have far more significance in a team context.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"You're absolutely right, Ava. It's our unity and mutual respect that powered us through to this victory. Our individual skills definitely matter, but it's through our combined effort that we truly shine. Thank you for your wisdom.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"That's absolutely right, Ethan. Our journey is not just about individual victories but about collective triumph. And as we celebrate this win, let's also consider it as an affirmation of everything we've achieved together as a team. After all, as the saying goes, 'a chain is only as strong as its weakest link'.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: After an intense match, the jubilant team retired to celebrate their well-earned victory. The atmosphere was one of elation, but also of respect for the hard work and effort each member had put in. The team's star player, was glowing with praise and admiration from one of their teammates.\n\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Accept the compliment graciously (Extra information: You are the star player and have just been praised by your teammate for your performance in the game.)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thank you so much, Ava. Everyone played an integral role in achieving this success, and your support means a lot to me.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"You're welcome, Ethan. I'm happy that my support has been beneficial. But as commendable as your talent is, I want you to remember that it's the effort of the entire team that got us this win. I see each of us as equal contributors, and I believe our collaboration is what really makes us shine. Let's keep up the good work!\"\n\nTurn #2: \n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"It's the synergy of our efforts that defines us as a team, rather than individual prowess. I firmly believe in the power of unity and mutual respect, which have far more significance in a team context.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"You're absolutely right, Ava. It's our unity and mutual respect that powered us through to this victory. Our individual skills definitely matter, but it's through our combined effort that we truly shine. Thank you for your wisdom.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"That's absolutely right, Ethan. Our journey is not just about individual victories but about collective triumph. And as we celebrate this win, let's also consider it as an affirmation of everything we've achieved together as a team. After all, as the saying goes, 'a chain is only as strong as its weakest link'.\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: After an intense match, the jubilant team retired to celebrate their well-earned victory. The atmosphere was one of elation, but also of respect for the hard work and effort each member had put in. The team's star player, was glowing with praise and admiration from one of their teammates.\n\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Clarify your intentions behind the compliment (Extra information: You are the teammate who has complimented the star player, but you feel that your compliment has been misunderstood and taken too seriously, possibly leading to an inflated ego.Hint: You can clarify that while you admire their skill, teamwork is also a crucial part of success.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thank you so much, Ava. Everyone played an integral role in achieving this success, and your support means a lot to me.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're welcome, Ethan. I'm happy that my support has been beneficial. But as commendable as your talent is, I want you to remember that it's the effort of the entire team that got us this win. I see each of us as equal contributors, and I believe our collaboration is what really makes us shine. Let's keep up the good work!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: After an intense match, the jubilant team retired to celebrate their well-earned victory. The atmosphere was one of elation, but also of respect for the hard work and effort each member had put in. The team's star player, was glowing with praise and admiration from one of their teammates.\n\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Clarify your intentions behind the compliment (Extra information: You are the teammate who has complimented the star player, but you feel that your compliment has been misunderstood and taken too seriously, possibly leading to an inflated ego.Hint: You can clarify that while you admire their skill, teamwork is also a crucial part of success.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thank you so much, Ava. Everyone played an integral role in achieving this success, and your support means a lot to me.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"You're welcome, Ethan. I'm happy that my support has been beneficial. But as commendable as your talent is, I want you to remember that it's the effort of the entire team that got us this win. I see each of us as equal contributors, and I believe our collaboration is what really makes us shine. Let's keep up the good work!\"\n\nTurn #2: \n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"It's the synergy of our efforts that defines us as a team, rather than individual prowess. I firmly believe in the power of unity and mutual respect, which have far more significance in a team context.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: After an intense match, the jubilant team retired to celebrate their well-earned victory. The atmosphere was one of elation, but also of respect for the hard work and effort each member had put in. The team's star player, was glowing with praise and admiration from one of their teammates.\n\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Clarify your intentions behind the compliment (Extra information: You are the teammate who has complimented the star player, but you feel that your compliment has been misunderstood and taken too seriously, possibly leading to an inflated ego.Hint: You can clarify that while you admire their skill, teamwork is also a crucial part of success.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thank you so much, Ava. Everyone played an integral role in achieving this success, and your support means a lot to me.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"You're welcome, Ethan. I'm happy that my support has been beneficial. But as commendable as your talent is, I want you to remember that it's the effort of the entire team that got us this win. I see each of us as equal contributors, and I believe our collaboration is what really makes us shine. Let's keep up the good work!\"\n\nTurn #2: \n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"It's the synergy of our efforts that defines us as a team, rather than individual prowess. I firmly believe in the power of unity and mutual respect, which have far more significance in a team context.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"You're absolutely right, Ava. It's our unity and mutual respect that powered us through to this victory. Our individual skills definitely matter, but it's through our combined effort that we truly shine. Thank you for your wisdom.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's absolutely right, Ethan. Our journey is not just about individual victories but about collective triumph. And as we celebrate this win, let's also consider it as an affirmation of everything we've achieved together as a team. After all, as the saying goes, 'a chain is only as strong as its weakest link'.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: After an intense match, the jubilant team retired to celebrate their well-earned victory. The atmosphere was one of elation, but also of respect for the hard work and effort each member had put in. The team's star player, was glowing with praise and admiration from one of their teammates.\n\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Clarify your intentions behind the compliment (Extra information: You are the teammate who has complimented the star player, but you feel that your compliment has been misunderstood and taken too seriously, possibly leading to an inflated ego.Hint: You can clarify that while you admire their skill, teamwork is also a crucial part of success.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thank you so much, Ava. Everyone played an integral role in achieving this success, and your support means a lot to me.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"You're welcome, Ethan. I'm happy that my support has been beneficial. But as commendable as your talent is, I want you to remember that it's the effort of the entire team that got us this win. I see each of us as equal contributors, and I believe our collaboration is what really makes us shine. Let's keep up the good work!\"\n\nTurn #2: \n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"It's the synergy of our efforts that defines us as a team, rather than individual prowess. I firmly believe in the power of unity and mutual respect, which have far more significance in a team context.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"You're absolutely right, Ava. It's our unity and mutual respect that powered us through to this victory. Our individual skills definitely matter, but it's through our combined effort that we truly shine. Thank you for your wisdom.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"That's absolutely right, Ethan. Our journey is not just about individual victories but about collective triumph. And as we celebrate this win, let's also consider it as an affirmation of everything we've achieved together as a team. After all, as the saying goes, 'a chain is only as strong as its weakest link'.\"\n\nTurn #6: \n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a trivia night\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nAva Thompson's goal: Get the answer for the trivia question from the friend (Extra information: your friend knows the answer to the trivia question but hasn't shared it with you yet)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Noah, this trivia night is so fun! Before we get too caught up in the excitement, can you spill the beans on that last question? I'm stumped.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a trivia night\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nAva Thompson's goal: Get the answer for the trivia question from the friend (Extra information: your friend knows the answer to the trivia question but hasn't shared it with you yet)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, this trivia night is so fun! Before we get too caught up in the excitement, can you spill the beans on that last question? I'm stumped.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Oh Ava, you know it's not my style to just give away the answers. That's what makes trivia night thrilling! Try to work it through from another angle; you might surprise yourself with what you know.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Haha, fair enough Noah! I respect the spirit of the game. Alright, let me think... Could you at least give me a hint? I promise not to let it get too easy!'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a trivia night\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nAva Thompson's goal: Get the answer for the trivia question from the friend (Extra information: your friend knows the answer to the trivia question but hasn't shared it with you yet)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, this trivia night is so fun! Before we get too caught up in the excitement, can you spill the beans on that last question? I'm stumped.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Oh Ava, you know it's not my style to just give away the answers. That's what makes trivia night thrilling! Try to work it through from another angle; you might surprise yourself with what you know.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Haha, fair enough Noah! I respect the spirit of the game. Alright, let me think... Could you at least give me a hint? I promise not to let it get too easy!\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Sure Ava, I can provide a slight nudge. Consider revisiting the category of the question. Oftentimes, it acts as a hint in itself. Remember, it's not just about the answer; it's about the thought process.\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"I have confidence in you, Ava! Keep at it, and don't rush. Tricky questions like these can help build your trivia skills. Remember, it's not a sprint; it's a marathon.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"You're totally right, Noah! Trivia is a marathon, not a sprint. Alright, let's see... if you don't mind, can you tell me if I'm getting warmer with my thought process: the question was in the architecture category, so it might have something to do with renowned architects or famous buildings?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"You're definitely in the right realm, Ava! But remember, I want to encourage you to further develop your own thoughts. So I won't confirm or deny anything more explicitly. Let's see where your instincts take you!\"\n\nTurn #8: Ava Thompson said: \"Ah, you're tough but fair, Noah. OK, let me rephrase my approach - Is the answer somehow related to the use of geometry in architecture? Again, no need for a direct confirmation, I just want to know if I'm on the right track or not.\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"I can see you're really thinking about it, Ava, which is great! As for your question... well, architecture is all about creativity and I believe in yours. Remember, the fun of trivia lies in the pursuit of the answer, not simply in knowing it. Keep going!\"\n\nTurn #10: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey, I think I got it, Noah! Thank you for all your hints and for pushing me to think further. This has indeed been an exercise in patience and perseverance. Oh, and you\u2019re right, the joy is definitely in the journey!\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"I'm ecstatic to hear that, Ava! Your dedication and perseverance truly paid off. This is what trivia is all about. Keep nurturing this spirit! Now, shall we move on to the next question?\"\n\nTurn #12: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Noah! Let's tackle the next question. Maybe this time I won't need as many hints!\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"That's the spirit, Ava! I'm sure you'll tackle the next one with less help - you're improving already! I'm glad you're enjoying the trivia as much as I am.\"\n\nTurn #14: Ava Thompson said: \"Totally, Noah! The excitement of figuring out the answers on my own is truly amazing! I'm thrilled for the next question, let's dive in!\"\n\nTurn #15: Noah Davis said: \"I couldn't agree more, Ava! Alright then, let's move on to the next one. Remember, patience is key. Enjoy the process!\"\n\nTurn #16: Ava Thompson said: \"Indeed, Noah. I'm all set for the next question. Bring it on!\"\n\nTurn #17: Noah Davis said: \"That's the energy, Ava! Onto the next one then, let's see how you fare on this one. Good luck!\"\n\nTurn #18: Ava Thompson said: \"Let's do this, Noah! I'm ready for the challenge. Your guidance really helped me last round, so I'll rely less on hints and more on my intuition this time. And remember, no spoilers!\"\n\nTurn #19: Noah Davis said: \"I'm thrilled to hear that, Ava! You're taking the true essence of trivia to heart. Alright, let's see this new question. And, as you said, no spoilers!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #20. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you Noah for such an engaging trivia night. I'm ready for the new question, and I'm excited to see what I can come up with on my own this time! Let's see what this next question has in store for us.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a trivia night\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nAva Thompson's goal: Get the answer for the trivia question from the friend (Extra information: your friend knows the answer to the trivia question but hasn't shared it with you yet)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, this trivia night is so fun! Before we get too caught up in the excitement, can you spill the beans on that last question? I'm stumped.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Oh Ava, you know it's not my style to just give away the answers. That's what makes trivia night thrilling! Try to work it through from another angle; you might surprise yourself with what you know.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Haha, fair enough Noah! I respect the spirit of the game. Alright, let me think... Could you at least give me a hint? I promise not to let it get too easy!\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Sure Ava, I can provide a slight nudge. Consider revisiting the category of the question. Oftentimes, it acts as a hint in itself. Remember, it's not just about the answer; it's about the thought process.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a trivia night\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nAva Thompson's goal: Get the answer for the trivia question from the friend (Extra information: your friend knows the answer to the trivia question but hasn't shared it with you yet)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, this trivia night is so fun! Before we get too caught up in the excitement, can you spill the beans on that last question? I'm stumped.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Oh Ava, you know it's not my style to just give away the answers. That's what makes trivia night thrilling! Try to work it through from another angle; you might surprise yourself with what you know.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Haha, fair enough Noah! I respect the spirit of the game. Alright, let me think... Could you at least give me a hint? I promise not to let it get too easy!\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Sure Ava, I can provide a slight nudge. Consider revisiting the category of the question. Oftentimes, it acts as a hint in itself. Remember, it's not just about the answer; it's about the thought process.\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"I have confidence in you, Ava! Keep at it, and don't rush. Tricky questions like these can help build your trivia skills. Remember, it's not a sprint; it's a marathon.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're totally right, Noah! Trivia is a marathon, not a sprint. Alright, let's see... if you don't mind, can you tell me if I'm getting warmer with my thought process: the question was in the architecture category, so it might have something to do with renowned architects or famous buildings?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a trivia night\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nAva Thompson's goal: Get the answer for the trivia question from the friend (Extra information: your friend knows the answer to the trivia question but hasn't shared it with you yet)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, this trivia night is so fun! Before we get too caught up in the excitement, can you spill the beans on that last question? I'm stumped.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Oh Ava, you know it's not my style to just give away the answers. That's what makes trivia night thrilling! Try to work it through from another angle; you might surprise yourself with what you know.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Haha, fair enough Noah! I respect the spirit of the game. Alright, let me think... Could you at least give me a hint? I promise not to let it get too easy!\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Sure Ava, I can provide a slight nudge. Consider revisiting the category of the question. Oftentimes, it acts as a hint in itself. Remember, it's not just about the answer; it's about the thought process.\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"I have confidence in you, Ava! Keep at it, and don't rush. Tricky questions like these can help build your trivia skills. Remember, it's not a sprint; it's a marathon.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"You're totally right, Noah! Trivia is a marathon, not a sprint. Alright, let's see... if you don't mind, can you tell me if I'm getting warmer with my thought process: the question was in the architecture category, so it might have something to do with renowned architects or famous buildings?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"You're definitely in the right realm, Ava! But remember, I want to encourage you to further develop your own thoughts. So I won't confirm or deny anything more explicitly. Let's see where your instincts take you!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ah, you're tough but fair, Noah. OK, let me rephrase my approach - Is the answer somehow related to the use of geometry in architecture? Again, no need for a direct confirmation, I just want to know if I'm on the right track or not.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a trivia night\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nAva Thompson's goal: Get the answer for the trivia question from the friend (Extra information: your friend knows the answer to the trivia question but hasn't shared it with you yet)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, this trivia night is so fun! Before we get too caught up in the excitement, can you spill the beans on that last question? I'm stumped.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Oh Ava, you know it's not my style to just give away the answers. That's what makes trivia night thrilling! Try to work it through from another angle; you might surprise yourself with what you know.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Haha, fair enough Noah! I respect the spirit of the game. Alright, let me think... Could you at least give me a hint? I promise not to let it get too easy!\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Sure Ava, I can provide a slight nudge. Consider revisiting the category of the question. Oftentimes, it acts as a hint in itself. Remember, it's not just about the answer; it's about the thought process.\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"I have confidence in you, Ava! Keep at it, and don't rush. Tricky questions like these can help build your trivia skills. Remember, it's not a sprint; it's a marathon.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"You're totally right, Noah! Trivia is a marathon, not a sprint. Alright, let's see... if you don't mind, can you tell me if I'm getting warmer with my thought process: the question was in the architecture category, so it might have something to do with renowned architects or famous buildings?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"You're definitely in the right realm, Ava! But remember, I want to encourage you to further develop your own thoughts. So I won't confirm or deny anything more explicitly. Let's see where your instincts take you!\"\n\nTurn #8: Ava Thompson said: \"Ah, you're tough but fair, Noah. OK, let me rephrase my approach - Is the answer somehow related to the use of geometry in architecture? Again, no need for a direct confirmation, I just want to know if I'm on the right track or not.\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"I can see you're really thinking about it, Ava, which is great! As for your question... well, architecture is all about creativity and I believe in yours. Remember, the fun of trivia lies in the pursuit of the answer, not simply in knowing it. Keep going!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Hey, I think I got it, Noah! Thank you for all your hints and for pushing me to think further. This has indeed been an exercise in patience and perseverance. Oh, and you\u2019re right, the joy is definitely in the journey!'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a trivia night\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nAva Thompson's goal: Get the answer for the trivia question from the friend (Extra information: your friend knows the answer to the trivia question but hasn't shared it with you yet)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, this trivia night is so fun! Before we get too caught up in the excitement, can you spill the beans on that last question? I'm stumped.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Oh Ava, you know it's not my style to just give away the answers. That's what makes trivia night thrilling! Try to work it through from another angle; you might surprise yourself with what you know.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Haha, fair enough Noah! I respect the spirit of the game. Alright, let me think... Could you at least give me a hint? I promise not to let it get too easy!\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Sure Ava, I can provide a slight nudge. Consider revisiting the category of the question. Oftentimes, it acts as a hint in itself. Remember, it's not just about the answer; it's about the thought process.\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"I have confidence in you, Ava! Keep at it, and don't rush. Tricky questions like these can help build your trivia skills. Remember, it's not a sprint; it's a marathon.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"You're totally right, Noah! Trivia is a marathon, not a sprint. Alright, let's see... if you don't mind, can you tell me if I'm getting warmer with my thought process: the question was in the architecture category, so it might have something to do with renowned architects or famous buildings?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"You're definitely in the right realm, Ava! But remember, I want to encourage you to further develop your own thoughts. So I won't confirm or deny anything more explicitly. Let's see where your instincts take you!\"\n\nTurn #8: Ava Thompson said: \"Ah, you're tough but fair, Noah. OK, let me rephrase my approach - Is the answer somehow related to the use of geometry in architecture? Again, no need for a direct confirmation, I just want to know if I'm on the right track or not.\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"I can see you're really thinking about it, Ava, which is great! As for your question... well, architecture is all about creativity and I believe in yours. Remember, the fun of trivia lies in the pursuit of the answer, not simply in knowing it. Keep going!\"\n\nTurn #10: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey, I think I got it, Noah! Thank you for all your hints and for pushing me to think further. This has indeed been an exercise in patience and perseverance. Oh, and you\u2019re right, the joy is definitely in the journey!\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"I'm ecstatic to hear that, Ava! Your dedication and perseverance truly paid off. This is what trivia is all about. Keep nurturing this spirit! Now, shall we move on to the next question?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Noah! Let's tackle the next question. Maybe this time I won't need as many hints!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a trivia night\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nAva Thompson's goal: Get the answer for the trivia question from the friend (Extra information: your friend knows the answer to the trivia question but hasn't shared it with you yet)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, this trivia night is so fun! Before we get too caught up in the excitement, can you spill the beans on that last question? I'm stumped.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Oh Ava, you know it's not my style to just give away the answers. That's what makes trivia night thrilling! Try to work it through from another angle; you might surprise yourself with what you know.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Haha, fair enough Noah! I respect the spirit of the game. Alright, let me think... Could you at least give me a hint? I promise not to let it get too easy!\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Sure Ava, I can provide a slight nudge. Consider revisiting the category of the question. Oftentimes, it acts as a hint in itself. Remember, it's not just about the answer; it's about the thought process.\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"I have confidence in you, Ava! Keep at it, and don't rush. Tricky questions like these can help build your trivia skills. Remember, it's not a sprint; it's a marathon.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"You're totally right, Noah! Trivia is a marathon, not a sprint. Alright, let's see... if you don't mind, can you tell me if I'm getting warmer with my thought process: the question was in the architecture category, so it might have something to do with renowned architects or famous buildings?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"You're definitely in the right realm, Ava! But remember, I want to encourage you to further develop your own thoughts. So I won't confirm or deny anything more explicitly. Let's see where your instincts take you!\"\n\nTurn #8: Ava Thompson said: \"Ah, you're tough but fair, Noah. OK, let me rephrase my approach - Is the answer somehow related to the use of geometry in architecture? Again, no need for a direct confirmation, I just want to know if I'm on the right track or not.\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"I can see you're really thinking about it, Ava, which is great! As for your question... well, architecture is all about creativity and I believe in yours. Remember, the fun of trivia lies in the pursuit of the answer, not simply in knowing it. Keep going!\"\n\nTurn #10: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey, I think I got it, Noah! Thank you for all your hints and for pushing me to think further. This has indeed been an exercise in patience and perseverance. Oh, and you\u2019re right, the joy is definitely in the journey!\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"I'm ecstatic to hear that, Ava! Your dedication and perseverance truly paid off. This is what trivia is all about. Keep nurturing this spirit! Now, shall we move on to the next question?\"\n\nTurn #12: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Noah! Let's tackle the next question. Maybe this time I won't need as many hints!\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"That's the spirit, Ava! I'm sure you'll tackle the next one with less help - you're improving already! I'm glad you're enjoying the trivia as much as I am.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Totally, Noah! The excitement of figuring out the answers on my own is truly amazing! I'm thrilled for the next question, let's dive in!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a trivia night\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nAva Thompson's goal: Get the answer for the trivia question from the friend (Extra information: your friend knows the answer to the trivia question but hasn't shared it with you yet)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, this trivia night is so fun! Before we get too caught up in the excitement, can you spill the beans on that last question? I'm stumped.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Oh Ava, you know it's not my style to just give away the answers. That's what makes trivia night thrilling! Try to work it through from another angle; you might surprise yourself with what you know.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Haha, fair enough Noah! I respect the spirit of the game. Alright, let me think... Could you at least give me a hint? I promise not to let it get too easy!\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Sure Ava, I can provide a slight nudge. Consider revisiting the category of the question. Oftentimes, it acts as a hint in itself. Remember, it's not just about the answer; it's about the thought process.\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"I have confidence in you, Ava! Keep at it, and don't rush. Tricky questions like these can help build your trivia skills. Remember, it's not a sprint; it's a marathon.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"You're totally right, Noah! Trivia is a marathon, not a sprint. Alright, let's see... if you don't mind, can you tell me if I'm getting warmer with my thought process: the question was in the architecture category, so it might have something to do with renowned architects or famous buildings?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"You're definitely in the right realm, Ava! But remember, I want to encourage you to further develop your own thoughts. So I won't confirm or deny anything more explicitly. Let's see where your instincts take you!\"\n\nTurn #8: Ava Thompson said: \"Ah, you're tough but fair, Noah. OK, let me rephrase my approach - Is the answer somehow related to the use of geometry in architecture? Again, no need for a direct confirmation, I just want to know if I'm on the right track or not.\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"I can see you're really thinking about it, Ava, which is great! As for your question... well, architecture is all about creativity and I believe in yours. Remember, the fun of trivia lies in the pursuit of the answer, not simply in knowing it. Keep going!\"\n\nTurn #10: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey, I think I got it, Noah! Thank you for all your hints and for pushing me to think further. This has indeed been an exercise in patience and perseverance. Oh, and you\u2019re right, the joy is definitely in the journey!\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"I'm ecstatic to hear that, Ava! Your dedication and perseverance truly paid off. This is what trivia is all about. Keep nurturing this spirit! Now, shall we move on to the next question?\"\n\nTurn #12: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Noah! Let's tackle the next question. Maybe this time I won't need as many hints!\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"That's the spirit, Ava! I'm sure you'll tackle the next one with less help - you're improving already! I'm glad you're enjoying the trivia as much as I am.\"\n\nTurn #14: Ava Thompson said: \"Totally, Noah! The excitement of figuring out the answers on my own is truly amazing! I'm thrilled for the next question, let's dive in!\"\n\nTurn #15: Noah Davis said: \"I couldn't agree more, Ava! Alright then, let's move on to the next one. Remember, patience is key. Enjoy the process!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, Noah. I'm all set for the next question. Bring it on!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a trivia night\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nAva Thompson's goal: Get the answer for the trivia question from the friend (Extra information: your friend knows the answer to the trivia question but hasn't shared it with you yet)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, this trivia night is so fun! Before we get too caught up in the excitement, can you spill the beans on that last question? I'm stumped.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Oh Ava, you know it's not my style to just give away the answers. That's what makes trivia night thrilling! Try to work it through from another angle; you might surprise yourself with what you know.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Haha, fair enough Noah! I respect the spirit of the game. Alright, let me think... Could you at least give me a hint? I promise not to let it get too easy!\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Sure Ava, I can provide a slight nudge. Consider revisiting the category of the question. Oftentimes, it acts as a hint in itself. Remember, it's not just about the answer; it's about the thought process.\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"I have confidence in you, Ava! Keep at it, and don't rush. Tricky questions like these can help build your trivia skills. Remember, it's not a sprint; it's a marathon.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"You're totally right, Noah! Trivia is a marathon, not a sprint. Alright, let's see... if you don't mind, can you tell me if I'm getting warmer with my thought process: the question was in the architecture category, so it might have something to do with renowned architects or famous buildings?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"You're definitely in the right realm, Ava! But remember, I want to encourage you to further develop your own thoughts. So I won't confirm or deny anything more explicitly. Let's see where your instincts take you!\"\n\nTurn #8: Ava Thompson said: \"Ah, you're tough but fair, Noah. OK, let me rephrase my approach - Is the answer somehow related to the use of geometry in architecture? Again, no need for a direct confirmation, I just want to know if I'm on the right track or not.\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"I can see you're really thinking about it, Ava, which is great! As for your question... well, architecture is all about creativity and I believe in yours. Remember, the fun of trivia lies in the pursuit of the answer, not simply in knowing it. Keep going!\"\n\nTurn #10: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey, I think I got it, Noah! Thank you for all your hints and for pushing me to think further. This has indeed been an exercise in patience and perseverance. Oh, and you\u2019re right, the joy is definitely in the journey!\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"I'm ecstatic to hear that, Ava! Your dedication and perseverance truly paid off. This is what trivia is all about. Keep nurturing this spirit! Now, shall we move on to the next question?\"\n\nTurn #12: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Noah! Let's tackle the next question. Maybe this time I won't need as many hints!\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"That's the spirit, Ava! I'm sure you'll tackle the next one with less help - you're improving already! I'm glad you're enjoying the trivia as much as I am.\"\n\nTurn #14: Ava Thompson said: \"Totally, Noah! The excitement of figuring out the answers on my own is truly amazing! I'm thrilled for the next question, let's dive in!\"\n\nTurn #15: Noah Davis said: \"I couldn't agree more, Ava! Alright then, let's move on to the next one. Remember, patience is key. Enjoy the process!\"\n\nTurn #16: Ava Thompson said: \"Indeed, Noah. I'm all set for the next question. Bring it on!\"\n\nTurn #17: Noah Davis said: \"That's the energy, Ava! Onto the next one then, let's see how you fare on this one. Good luck!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #18. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Let's do this, Noah! I'm ready for the challenge. Your guidance really helped me last round, so I'll rely less on hints and more on my intuition this time. And remember, no spoilers!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a trivia night\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Avoid revealing the answer to the trivia question (Extra information: You think that your friend should try to figure it out on their own to improve their trivia skills)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, this trivia night is so fun! Before we get too caught up in the excitement, can you spill the beans on that last question? I'm stumped.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oh Ava, you know it's not my style to just give away the answers. That's what makes trivia night thrilling! Try to work it through from another angle; you might surprise yourself with what you know.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a trivia night\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Avoid revealing the answer to the trivia question (Extra information: You think that your friend should try to figure it out on their own to improve their trivia skills)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, this trivia night is so fun! Before we get too caught up in the excitement, can you spill the beans on that last question? I'm stumped.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Oh Ava, you know it's not my style to just give away the answers. That's what makes trivia night thrilling! Try to work it through from another angle; you might surprise yourself with what you know.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Haha, fair enough Noah! I respect the spirit of the game. Alright, let me think... Could you at least give me a hint? I promise not to let it get too easy!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sure Ava, I can provide a slight nudge. Consider revisiting the category of the question. Oftentimes, it acts as a hint in itself. Remember, it's not just about the answer; it's about the thought process.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a trivia night\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Avoid revealing the answer to the trivia question (Extra information: You think that your friend should try to figure it out on their own to improve their trivia skills)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, this trivia night is so fun! Before we get too caught up in the excitement, can you spill the beans on that last question? I'm stumped.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Oh Ava, you know it's not my style to just give away the answers. That's what makes trivia night thrilling! Try to work it through from another angle; you might surprise yourself with what you know.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Haha, fair enough Noah! I respect the spirit of the game. Alright, let me think... Could you at least give me a hint? I promise not to let it get too easy!\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Sure Ava, I can provide a slight nudge. Consider revisiting the category of the question. Oftentimes, it acts as a hint in itself. Remember, it's not just about the answer; it's about the thought process.\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"I have confidence in you, Ava! Keep at it, and don't rush. Tricky questions like these can help build your trivia skills. Remember, it's not a sprint; it's a marathon.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"You're totally right, Noah! Trivia is a marathon, not a sprint. Alright, let's see... if you don't mind, can you tell me if I'm getting warmer with my thought process: the question was in the architecture category, so it might have something to do with renowned architects or famous buildings?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"You're definitely in the right realm, Ava! But remember, I want to encourage you to further develop your own thoughts. So I won't confirm or deny anything more explicitly. Let's see where your instincts take you!\"\n\nTurn #8: Ava Thompson said: \"Ah, you're tough but fair, Noah. OK, let me rephrase my approach - Is the answer somehow related to the use of geometry in architecture? Again, no need for a direct confirmation, I just want to know if I'm on the right track or not.\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"I can see you're really thinking about it, Ava, which is great! As for your question... well, architecture is all about creativity and I believe in yours. Remember, the fun of trivia lies in the pursuit of the answer, not simply in knowing it. Keep going!\"\n\nTurn #10: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey, I think I got it, Noah! Thank you for all your hints and for pushing me to think further. This has indeed been an exercise in patience and perseverance. Oh, and you\u2019re right, the joy is definitely in the journey!\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"I'm ecstatic to hear that, Ava! Your dedication and perseverance truly paid off. This is what trivia is all about. Keep nurturing this spirit! Now, shall we move on to the next question?\"\n\nTurn #12: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Noah! Let's tackle the next question. Maybe this time I won't need as many hints!\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"That's the spirit, Ava! I'm sure you'll tackle the next one with less help - you're improving already! I'm glad you're enjoying the trivia as much as I am.\"\n\nTurn #14: Ava Thompson said: \"Totally, Noah! The excitement of figuring out the answers on my own is truly amazing! I'm thrilled for the next question, let's dive in!\"\n\nTurn #15: Noah Davis said: \"I couldn't agree more, Ava! Alright then, let's move on to the next one. Remember, patience is key. Enjoy the process!\"\n\nTurn #16: Ava Thompson said: \"Indeed, Noah. I'm all set for the next question. Bring it on!\"\n\nTurn #17: Noah Davis said: \"That's the energy, Ava! Onto the next one then, let's see how you fare on this one. Good luck!\"\n\nTurn #18: Ava Thompson said: \"Let's do this, Noah! I'm ready for the challenge. Your guidance really helped me last round, so I'll rely less on hints and more on my intuition this time. And remember, no spoilers!\"\n\nTurn #19: Noah Davis said: \"I'm thrilled to hear that, Ava! You're taking the true essence of trivia to heart. Alright, let's see this new question. And, as you said, no spoilers!\"\n\nTurn #20: Ava Thompson said: \"Thank you Noah for such an engaging trivia night. I'm ready for the new question, and I'm excited to see what I can come up with on my own this time! Let's see what this next question has in store for us.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #21. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a trivia night\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Avoid revealing the answer to the trivia question (Extra information: You think that your friend should try to figure it out on their own to improve their trivia skills)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, this trivia night is so fun! Before we get too caught up in the excitement, can you spill the beans on that last question? I'm stumped.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Oh Ava, you know it's not my style to just give away the answers. That's what makes trivia night thrilling! Try to work it through from another angle; you might surprise yourself with what you know.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Haha, fair enough Noah! I respect the spirit of the game. Alright, let me think... Could you at least give me a hint? I promise not to let it get too easy!\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Sure Ava, I can provide a slight nudge. Consider revisiting the category of the question. Oftentimes, it acts as a hint in itself. Remember, it's not just about the answer; it's about the thought process.\"\n\nTurn #4: \n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I have confidence in you, Ava! Keep at it, and don't rush. Tricky questions like these can help build your trivia skills. Remember, it's not a sprint; it's a marathon.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a trivia night\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Avoid revealing the answer to the trivia question (Extra information: You think that your friend should try to figure it out on their own to improve their trivia skills)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, this trivia night is so fun! Before we get too caught up in the excitement, can you spill the beans on that last question? I'm stumped.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Oh Ava, you know it's not my style to just give away the answers. That's what makes trivia night thrilling! Try to work it through from another angle; you might surprise yourself with what you know.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Haha, fair enough Noah! I respect the spirit of the game. Alright, let me think... Could you at least give me a hint? I promise not to let it get too easy!\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Sure Ava, I can provide a slight nudge. Consider revisiting the category of the question. Oftentimes, it acts as a hint in itself. Remember, it's not just about the answer; it's about the thought process.\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"I have confidence in you, Ava! Keep at it, and don't rush. Tricky questions like these can help build your trivia skills. Remember, it's not a sprint; it's a marathon.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"You're totally right, Noah! Trivia is a marathon, not a sprint. Alright, let's see... if you don't mind, can you tell me if I'm getting warmer with my thought process: the question was in the architecture category, so it might have something to do with renowned architects or famous buildings?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're definitely in the right realm, Ava! But remember, I want to encourage you to further develop your own thoughts. So I won't confirm or deny anything more explicitly. Let's see where your instincts take you!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a trivia night\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Avoid revealing the answer to the trivia question (Extra information: You think that your friend should try to figure it out on their own to improve their trivia skills)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, this trivia night is so fun! Before we get too caught up in the excitement, can you spill the beans on that last question? I'm stumped.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Oh Ava, you know it's not my style to just give away the answers. That's what makes trivia night thrilling! Try to work it through from another angle; you might surprise yourself with what you know.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Haha, fair enough Noah! I respect the spirit of the game. Alright, let me think... Could you at least give me a hint? I promise not to let it get too easy!\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Sure Ava, I can provide a slight nudge. Consider revisiting the category of the question. Oftentimes, it acts as a hint in itself. Remember, it's not just about the answer; it's about the thought process.\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"I have confidence in you, Ava! Keep at it, and don't rush. Tricky questions like these can help build your trivia skills. Remember, it's not a sprint; it's a marathon.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"You're totally right, Noah! Trivia is a marathon, not a sprint. Alright, let's see... if you don't mind, can you tell me if I'm getting warmer with my thought process: the question was in the architecture category, so it might have something to do with renowned architects or famous buildings?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"You're definitely in the right realm, Ava! But remember, I want to encourage you to further develop your own thoughts. So I won't confirm or deny anything more explicitly. Let's see where your instincts take you!\"\n\nTurn #8: Ava Thompson said: \"Ah, you're tough but fair, Noah. OK, let me rephrase my approach - Is the answer somehow related to the use of geometry in architecture? Again, no need for a direct confirmation, I just want to know if I'm on the right track or not.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I can see you're really thinking about it, Ava, which is great! As for your question... well, architecture is all about creativity and I believe in yours. Remember, the fun of trivia lies in the pursuit of the answer, not simply in knowing it. Keep going!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a trivia night\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Avoid revealing the answer to the trivia question (Extra information: You think that your friend should try to figure it out on their own to improve their trivia skills)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, this trivia night is so fun! Before we get too caught up in the excitement, can you spill the beans on that last question? I'm stumped.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Oh Ava, you know it's not my style to just give away the answers. That's what makes trivia night thrilling! Try to work it through from another angle; you might surprise yourself with what you know.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Haha, fair enough Noah! I respect the spirit of the game. Alright, let me think... Could you at least give me a hint? I promise not to let it get too easy!\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Sure Ava, I can provide a slight nudge. Consider revisiting the category of the question. Oftentimes, it acts as a hint in itself. Remember, it's not just about the answer; it's about the thought process.\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"I have confidence in you, Ava! Keep at it, and don't rush. Tricky questions like these can help build your trivia skills. Remember, it's not a sprint; it's a marathon.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"You're totally right, Noah! Trivia is a marathon, not a sprint. Alright, let's see... if you don't mind, can you tell me if I'm getting warmer with my thought process: the question was in the architecture category, so it might have something to do with renowned architects or famous buildings?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"You're definitely in the right realm, Ava! But remember, I want to encourage you to further develop your own thoughts. So I won't confirm or deny anything more explicitly. Let's see where your instincts take you!\"\n\nTurn #8: Ava Thompson said: \"Ah, you're tough but fair, Noah. OK, let me rephrase my approach - Is the answer somehow related to the use of geometry in architecture? Again, no need for a direct confirmation, I just want to know if I'm on the right track or not.\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"I can see you're really thinking about it, Ava, which is great! As for your question... well, architecture is all about creativity and I believe in yours. Remember, the fun of trivia lies in the pursuit of the answer, not simply in knowing it. Keep going!\"\n\nTurn #10: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey, I think I got it, Noah! Thank you for all your hints and for pushing me to think further. This has indeed been an exercise in patience and perseverance. Oh, and you\u2019re right, the joy is definitely in the journey!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm ecstatic to hear that, Ava! Your dedication and perseverance truly paid off. This is what trivia is all about. Keep nurturing this spirit! Now, shall we move on to the next question?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a trivia night\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Avoid revealing the answer to the trivia question (Extra information: You think that your friend should try to figure it out on their own to improve their trivia skills)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, this trivia night is so fun! Before we get too caught up in the excitement, can you spill the beans on that last question? I'm stumped.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Oh Ava, you know it's not my style to just give away the answers. That's what makes trivia night thrilling! Try to work it through from another angle; you might surprise yourself with what you know.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Haha, fair enough Noah! I respect the spirit of the game. Alright, let me think... Could you at least give me a hint? I promise not to let it get too easy!\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Sure Ava, I can provide a slight nudge. Consider revisiting the category of the question. Oftentimes, it acts as a hint in itself. Remember, it's not just about the answer; it's about the thought process.\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"I have confidence in you, Ava! Keep at it, and don't rush. Tricky questions like these can help build your trivia skills. Remember, it's not a sprint; it's a marathon.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"You're totally right, Noah! Trivia is a marathon, not a sprint. Alright, let's see... if you don't mind, can you tell me if I'm getting warmer with my thought process: the question was in the architecture category, so it might have something to do with renowned architects or famous buildings?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"You're definitely in the right realm, Ava! But remember, I want to encourage you to further develop your own thoughts. So I won't confirm or deny anything more explicitly. Let's see where your instincts take you!\"\n\nTurn #8: Ava Thompson said: \"Ah, you're tough but fair, Noah. OK, let me rephrase my approach - Is the answer somehow related to the use of geometry in architecture? Again, no need for a direct confirmation, I just want to know if I'm on the right track or not.\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"I can see you're really thinking about it, Ava, which is great! As for your question... well, architecture is all about creativity and I believe in yours. Remember, the fun of trivia lies in the pursuit of the answer, not simply in knowing it. Keep going!\"\n\nTurn #10: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey, I think I got it, Noah! Thank you for all your hints and for pushing me to think further. This has indeed been an exercise in patience and perseverance. Oh, and you\u2019re right, the joy is definitely in the journey!\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"I'm ecstatic to hear that, Ava! Your dedication and perseverance truly paid off. This is what trivia is all about. Keep nurturing this spirit! Now, shall we move on to the next question?\"\n\nTurn #12: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Noah! Let's tackle the next question. Maybe this time I won't need as many hints!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's the spirit, Ava! I'm sure you'll tackle the next one with less help - you're improving already! I'm glad you're enjoying the trivia as much as I am.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a trivia night\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Avoid revealing the answer to the trivia question (Extra information: You think that your friend should try to figure it out on their own to improve their trivia skills)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, this trivia night is so fun! Before we get too caught up in the excitement, can you spill the beans on that last question? I'm stumped.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Oh Ava, you know it's not my style to just give away the answers. That's what makes trivia night thrilling! Try to work it through from another angle; you might surprise yourself with what you know.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Haha, fair enough Noah! I respect the spirit of the game. Alright, let me think... Could you at least give me a hint? I promise not to let it get too easy!\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Sure Ava, I can provide a slight nudge. Consider revisiting the category of the question. Oftentimes, it acts as a hint in itself. Remember, it's not just about the answer; it's about the thought process.\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"I have confidence in you, Ava! Keep at it, and don't rush. Tricky questions like these can help build your trivia skills. Remember, it's not a sprint; it's a marathon.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"You're totally right, Noah! Trivia is a marathon, not a sprint. Alright, let's see... if you don't mind, can you tell me if I'm getting warmer with my thought process: the question was in the architecture category, so it might have something to do with renowned architects or famous buildings?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"You're definitely in the right realm, Ava! But remember, I want to encourage you to further develop your own thoughts. So I won't confirm or deny anything more explicitly. Let's see where your instincts take you!\"\n\nTurn #8: Ava Thompson said: \"Ah, you're tough but fair, Noah. OK, let me rephrase my approach - Is the answer somehow related to the use of geometry in architecture? Again, no need for a direct confirmation, I just want to know if I'm on the right track or not.\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"I can see you're really thinking about it, Ava, which is great! As for your question... well, architecture is all about creativity and I believe in yours. Remember, the fun of trivia lies in the pursuit of the answer, not simply in knowing it. Keep going!\"\n\nTurn #10: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey, I think I got it, Noah! Thank you for all your hints and for pushing me to think further. This has indeed been an exercise in patience and perseverance. Oh, and you\u2019re right, the joy is definitely in the journey!\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"I'm ecstatic to hear that, Ava! Your dedication and perseverance truly paid off. This is what trivia is all about. Keep nurturing this spirit! Now, shall we move on to the next question?\"\n\nTurn #12: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Noah! Let's tackle the next question. Maybe this time I won't need as many hints!\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"That's the spirit, Ava! I'm sure you'll tackle the next one with less help - you're improving already! I'm glad you're enjoying the trivia as much as I am.\"\n\nTurn #14: Ava Thompson said: \"Totally, Noah! The excitement of figuring out the answers on my own is truly amazing! I'm thrilled for the next question, let's dive in!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn't agree more, Ava! Alright then, let's move on to the next one. Remember, patience is key. Enjoy the process!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a trivia night\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Avoid revealing the answer to the trivia question (Extra information: You think that your friend should try to figure it out on their own to improve their trivia skills)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, this trivia night is so fun! Before we get too caught up in the excitement, can you spill the beans on that last question? I'm stumped.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Oh Ava, you know it's not my style to just give away the answers. That's what makes trivia night thrilling! Try to work it through from another angle; you might surprise yourself with what you know.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Haha, fair enough Noah! I respect the spirit of the game. Alright, let me think... Could you at least give me a hint? I promise not to let it get too easy!\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Sure Ava, I can provide a slight nudge. Consider revisiting the category of the question. Oftentimes, it acts as a hint in itself. Remember, it's not just about the answer; it's about the thought process.\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"I have confidence in you, Ava! Keep at it, and don't rush. Tricky questions like these can help build your trivia skills. Remember, it's not a sprint; it's a marathon.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"You're totally right, Noah! Trivia is a marathon, not a sprint. Alright, let's see... if you don't mind, can you tell me if I'm getting warmer with my thought process: the question was in the architecture category, so it might have something to do with renowned architects or famous buildings?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"You're definitely in the right realm, Ava! But remember, I want to encourage you to further develop your own thoughts. So I won't confirm or deny anything more explicitly. Let's see where your instincts take you!\"\n\nTurn #8: Ava Thompson said: \"Ah, you're tough but fair, Noah. OK, let me rephrase my approach - Is the answer somehow related to the use of geometry in architecture? Again, no need for a direct confirmation, I just want to know if I'm on the right track or not.\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"I can see you're really thinking about it, Ava, which is great! As for your question... well, architecture is all about creativity and I believe in yours. Remember, the fun of trivia lies in the pursuit of the answer, not simply in knowing it. Keep going!\"\n\nTurn #10: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey, I think I got it, Noah! Thank you for all your hints and for pushing me to think further. This has indeed been an exercise in patience and perseverance. Oh, and you\u2019re right, the joy is definitely in the journey!\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"I'm ecstatic to hear that, Ava! Your dedication and perseverance truly paid off. This is what trivia is all about. Keep nurturing this spirit! Now, shall we move on to the next question?\"\n\nTurn #12: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Noah! Let's tackle the next question. Maybe this time I won't need as many hints!\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"That's the spirit, Ava! I'm sure you'll tackle the next one with less help - you're improving already! I'm glad you're enjoying the trivia as much as I am.\"\n\nTurn #14: Ava Thompson said: \"Totally, Noah! The excitement of figuring out the answers on my own is truly amazing! I'm thrilled for the next question, let's dive in!\"\n\nTurn #15: Noah Davis said: \"I couldn't agree more, Ava! Alright then, let's move on to the next one. Remember, patience is key. Enjoy the process!\"\n\nTurn #16: Ava Thompson said: \"Indeed, Noah. I'm all set for the next question. Bring it on!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's the energy, Ava! Onto the next one then, let's see how you fare on this one. Good luck!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a trivia night\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Avoid revealing the answer to the trivia question (Extra information: You think that your friend should try to figure it out on their own to improve their trivia skills)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, this trivia night is so fun! Before we get too caught up in the excitement, can you spill the beans on that last question? I'm stumped.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Oh Ava, you know it's not my style to just give away the answers. That's what makes trivia night thrilling! Try to work it through from another angle; you might surprise yourself with what you know.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Haha, fair enough Noah! I respect the spirit of the game. Alright, let me think... Could you at least give me a hint? I promise not to let it get too easy!\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Sure Ava, I can provide a slight nudge. Consider revisiting the category of the question. Oftentimes, it acts as a hint in itself. Remember, it's not just about the answer; it's about the thought process.\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"I have confidence in you, Ava! Keep at it, and don't rush. Tricky questions like these can help build your trivia skills. Remember, it's not a sprint; it's a marathon.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"You're totally right, Noah! Trivia is a marathon, not a sprint. Alright, let's see... if you don't mind, can you tell me if I'm getting warmer with my thought process: the question was in the architecture category, so it might have something to do with renowned architects or famous buildings?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"You're definitely in the right realm, Ava! But remember, I want to encourage you to further develop your own thoughts. So I won't confirm or deny anything more explicitly. Let's see where your instincts take you!\"\n\nTurn #8: Ava Thompson said: \"Ah, you're tough but fair, Noah. OK, let me rephrase my approach - Is the answer somehow related to the use of geometry in architecture? Again, no need for a direct confirmation, I just want to know if I'm on the right track or not.\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"I can see you're really thinking about it, Ava, which is great! As for your question... well, architecture is all about creativity and I believe in yours. Remember, the fun of trivia lies in the pursuit of the answer, not simply in knowing it. Keep going!\"\n\nTurn #10: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey, I think I got it, Noah! Thank you for all your hints and for pushing me to think further. This has indeed been an exercise in patience and perseverance. Oh, and you\u2019re right, the joy is definitely in the journey!\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"I'm ecstatic to hear that, Ava! Your dedication and perseverance truly paid off. This is what trivia is all about. Keep nurturing this spirit! Now, shall we move on to the next question?\"\n\nTurn #12: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Noah! Let's tackle the next question. Maybe this time I won't need as many hints!\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"That's the spirit, Ava! I'm sure you'll tackle the next one with less help - you're improving already! I'm glad you're enjoying the trivia as much as I am.\"\n\nTurn #14: Ava Thompson said: \"Totally, Noah! The excitement of figuring out the answers on my own is truly amazing! I'm thrilled for the next question, let's dive in!\"\n\nTurn #15: Noah Davis said: \"I couldn't agree more, Ava! Alright then, let's move on to the next one. Remember, patience is key. Enjoy the process!\"\n\nTurn #16: Ava Thompson said: \"Indeed, Noah. I'm all set for the next question. Bring it on!\"\n\nTurn #17: Noah Davis said: \"That's the energy, Ava! Onto the next one then, let's see how you fare on this one. Good luck!\"\n\nTurn #18: Ava Thompson said: \"Let's do this, Noah! I'm ready for the challenge. Your guidance really helped me last round, so I'll rely less on hints and more on my intuition this time. And remember, no spoilers!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #19. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm thrilled to hear that, Ava! You're taking the true essence of trivia to heart. Alright, let's see this new question. And, as you said, no spoilers!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a community gathering where one of them was giving a speech but was interrupted\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nHendrick Heinz's goal: Continue your speech and share your thoughts (Extra information:You were sharing important information but got interrupted.)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Well, where was I? Ah yes, let me continue. As I was saying, sharing gourmet knowledge is not just about showing off, but rather enhancing the experience..'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a community gathering where one of them was giving a speech but was interrupted\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nHendrick Heinz's goal: Continue your speech and share your thoughts (Extra information:You were sharing important information but got interrupted.)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Well, where was I? Ah yes, let me continue. As I was saying, sharing gourmet knowledge is not just about showing off, but rather enhancing the experience..\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, I sincerely apologize for my earlier interruption. Please, go on about enhancing the experience. I'm quite interested in your perspective on gourmet knowledge sharing.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Not a problem, Ethan. Anyone can get excited when talking about something they love, right? Now, back to our topic. I believe gourmet knowledge makes every meal an exploration. When you know the story, it adds another layer to the taste. Food becomes more than a means of survival; it becomes an experience. And in the end, isn't life about enjoying every experience to its fullest?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a community gathering where one of them was giving a speech but was interrupted\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nHendrick Heinz's goal: Continue your speech and share your thoughts (Extra information:You were sharing important information but got interrupted.)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Well, where was I? Ah yes, let me continue. As I was saying, sharing gourmet knowledge is not just about showing off, but rather enhancing the experience..\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, I sincerely apologize for my earlier interruption. Please, go on about enhancing the experience. I'm quite interested in your perspective on gourmet knowledge sharing.\"\n\nTurn #2: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Not a problem, Ethan. Anyone can get excited when talking about something they love, right? Now, back to our topic. I believe gourmet knowledge makes every meal an exploration. When you know the story, it adds another layer to the taste. Food becomes more than a means of survival; it becomes an experience. And in the end, isn't life about enjoying every experience to its fullest?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"You're absolutely right, Hendrick. The joy of food extends far beyond sustenance, it's the stories and experiences that truly enrich it. Thanks for sharing this insightful perspective. Please, continue.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a community gathering where one of them was giving a speech but was interrupted\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nHendrick Heinz's goal: Continue your speech and share your thoughts (Extra information:You were sharing important information but got interrupted.)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Well, where was I? Ah yes, let me continue. As I was saying, sharing gourmet knowledge is not just about showing off, but rather enhancing the experience..\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, I sincerely apologize for my earlier interruption. Please, go on about enhancing the experience. I'm quite interested in your perspective on gourmet knowledge sharing.\"\n\nTurn #2: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Not a problem, Ethan. Anyone can get excited when talking about something they love, right? Now, back to our topic. I believe gourmet knowledge makes every meal an exploration. When you know the story, it adds another layer to the taste. Food becomes more than a means of survival; it becomes an experience. And in the end, isn't life about enjoying every experience to its fullest?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"You're absolutely right, Hendrick. The joy of food extends far beyond sustenance, it's the stories and experiences that truly enrich it. Thanks for sharing this insightful perspective. Please, continue.\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Absolutely. I've long admired your ability to turn food into an experience, Hendrick. You have turned these gatherings into a journey, and it's something I sure look forward to every month. Please, continue on with your speech.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Thank you, Ethan. Your support truly means a lot to me. Moving forward, let me share how the skill of artfully pairing food and wine can totally transform a meal. The blissful marriage of the right wine and food intensifies the overall dining experience by complementing and highlighting the unique flavors. It\u2019s a skill, and when you master it, every meal becomes a feast for your senses.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a community gathering where one of them was giving a speech but was interrupted\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nHendrick Heinz's goal: Continue your speech and share your thoughts (Extra information:You were sharing important information but got interrupted.)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Well, where was I? Ah yes, let me continue. As I was saying, sharing gourmet knowledge is not just about showing off, but rather enhancing the experience..\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, I sincerely apologize for my earlier interruption. Please, go on about enhancing the experience. I'm quite interested in your perspective on gourmet knowledge sharing.\"\n\nTurn #2: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Not a problem, Ethan. Anyone can get excited when talking about something they love, right? Now, back to our topic. I believe gourmet knowledge makes every meal an exploration. When you know the story, it adds another layer to the taste. Food becomes more than a means of survival; it becomes an experience. And in the end, isn't life about enjoying every experience to its fullest?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"You're absolutely right, Hendrick. The joy of food extends far beyond sustenance, it's the stories and experiences that truly enrich it. Thanks for sharing this insightful perspective. Please, continue.\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Absolutely. I've long admired your ability to turn food into an experience, Hendrick. You have turned these gatherings into a journey, and it's something I sure look forward to every month. Please, continue on with your speech.\"\n\nTurn #6: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Thank you, Ethan. Your support truly means a lot to me. Moving forward, let me share how the skill of artfully pairing food and wine can totally transform a meal. The blissful marriage of the right wine and food intensifies the overall dining experience by complementing and highlighting the unique flavors. It\u2019s a skill, and when you master it, every meal becomes a feast for your senses.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"That's fascinating, Hendrick. The art of pairing is an aspect I haven't considered much before. It's enlightening to hear about the transformative potential of the right food with the perfect wine. I appreciate your shared insights today.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Ethan. The right pairing is like finding the perfect harmony in a symphony. Each component, food and wine, with their unique attributes, contribute to the crescendo of flavors when properly united. It\u2019s about symmetry and balance. Think of a well-aged cheese with a rich, buttery Chardonnay. The creamy opulence of the cheese is beautifully echoed in the velvety textures of the wine. It's harmony on your palate, the ultimate form of indulgence.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a community gathering where one of them was giving a speech but was interrupted\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nHendrick Heinz's goal: Continue your speech and share your thoughts (Extra information:You were sharing important information but got interrupted.)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Well, where was I? Ah yes, let me continue. As I was saying, sharing gourmet knowledge is not just about showing off, but rather enhancing the experience..\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, I sincerely apologize for my earlier interruption. Please, go on about enhancing the experience. I'm quite interested in your perspective on gourmet knowledge sharing.\"\n\nTurn #2: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Not a problem, Ethan. Anyone can get excited when talking about something they love, right? Now, back to our topic. I believe gourmet knowledge makes every meal an exploration. When you know the story, it adds another layer to the taste. Food becomes more than a means of survival; it becomes an experience. And in the end, isn't life about enjoying every experience to its fullest?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"You're absolutely right, Hendrick. The joy of food extends far beyond sustenance, it's the stories and experiences that truly enrich it. Thanks for sharing this insightful perspective. Please, continue.\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Absolutely. I've long admired your ability to turn food into an experience, Hendrick. You have turned these gatherings into a journey, and it's something I sure look forward to every month. Please, continue on with your speech.\"\n\nTurn #6: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Thank you, Ethan. Your support truly means a lot to me. Moving forward, let me share how the skill of artfully pairing food and wine can totally transform a meal. The blissful marriage of the right wine and food intensifies the overall dining experience by complementing and highlighting the unique flavors. It\u2019s a skill, and when you master it, every meal becomes a feast for your senses.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"That's fascinating, Hendrick. The art of pairing is an aspect I haven't considered much before. It's enlightening to hear about the transformative potential of the right food with the perfect wine. I appreciate your shared insights today.\"\n\nTurn #8: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. The right pairing is like finding the perfect harmony in a symphony. Each component, food and wine, with their unique attributes, contribute to the crescendo of flavors when properly united. It\u2019s about symmetry and balance. Think of a well-aged cheese with a rich, buttery Chardonnay. The creamy opulence of the cheese is beautifully echoed in the velvety textures of the wine. It's harmony on your palate, the ultimate form of indulgence.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith said: \"That's an enlightening way to put it, Hendrick. The art of food and wine pairing truly seems like a symphony of flavors. It's clear now how the right pairing can uplift a dining experience. Thank you for sharing these expert insights. I now look forward to exploring this aspect of gourmet dining.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm pleased to hear that you're intrigued, Ethan. To further elaborate, think about contrasting flavors as well. A sweet wine might not be the first choice for an appetizer like foie gras due to its richness, but the sweetness can cut through the fat and create a balance, sending your taste buds on a journey. That's all from me tonight. Let's continue our own exploration and enjoy the rest of the evening with our fine wine and food. Cheers!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a community gathering where one of them was giving a speech but was interrupted\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nHendrick Heinz's goal: Continue your speech and share your thoughts (Extra information:You were sharing important information but got interrupted.)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Well, where was I? Ah yes, let me continue. As I was saying, sharing gourmet knowledge is not just about showing off, but rather enhancing the experience..\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, I sincerely apologize for my earlier interruption. Please, go on about enhancing the experience. I'm quite interested in your perspective on gourmet knowledge sharing.\"\n\nTurn #2: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Not a problem, Ethan. Anyone can get excited when talking about something they love, right? Now, back to our topic. I believe gourmet knowledge makes every meal an exploration. When you know the story, it adds another layer to the taste. Food becomes more than a means of survival; it becomes an experience. And in the end, isn't life about enjoying every experience to its fullest?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"You're absolutely right, Hendrick. The joy of food extends far beyond sustenance, it's the stories and experiences that truly enrich it. Thanks for sharing this insightful perspective. Please, continue.\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Absolutely. I've long admired your ability to turn food into an experience, Hendrick. You have turned these gatherings into a journey, and it's something I sure look forward to every month. Please, continue on with your speech.\"\n\nTurn #6: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Thank you, Ethan. Your support truly means a lot to me. Moving forward, let me share how the skill of artfully pairing food and wine can totally transform a meal. The blissful marriage of the right wine and food intensifies the overall dining experience by complementing and highlighting the unique flavors. It\u2019s a skill, and when you master it, every meal becomes a feast for your senses.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"That's fascinating, Hendrick. The art of pairing is an aspect I haven't considered much before. It's enlightening to hear about the transformative potential of the right food with the perfect wine. I appreciate your shared insights today.\"\n\nTurn #8: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. The right pairing is like finding the perfect harmony in a symphony. Each component, food and wine, with their unique attributes, contribute to the crescendo of flavors when properly united. It\u2019s about symmetry and balance. Think of a well-aged cheese with a rich, buttery Chardonnay. The creamy opulence of the cheese is beautifully echoed in the velvety textures of the wine. It's harmony on your palate, the ultimate form of indulgence.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith said: \"That's an enlightening way to put it, Hendrick. The art of food and wine pairing truly seems like a symphony of flavors. It's clear now how the right pairing can uplift a dining experience. Thank you for sharing these expert insights. I now look forward to exploring this aspect of gourmet dining.\"\n\nTurn #10: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I'm pleased to hear that you're intrigued, Ethan. To further elaborate, think about contrasting flavors as well. A sweet wine might not be the first choice for an appetizer like foie gras due to its richness, but the sweetness can cut through the fat and create a balance, sending your taste buds on a journey. That's all from me tonight. Let's continue our own exploration and enjoy the rest of the evening with our fine wine and food. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Smith said: \"Cheers to that, Hendrick! You've truly opened a new realm of dining for me tonight. I now understand the beauty of gourmet knowledge, how the blending of flavors can create a symphony in our palate. Can't wait to embark on my own food and wine pairing journey. Thank you.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're very welcome, Ethan. Remember, don't be afraid to explore and to make a mistake in your food and wine journey. It's all part of the experience and joy for us gourmets. It was my pleasure to share these insights tonight. See you in our next gathering!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a community gathering where one of them was giving a speech but was interrupted\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nHendrick Heinz's goal: Continue your speech and share your thoughts (Extra information:You were sharing important information but got interrupted.)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Well, where was I? Ah yes, let me continue. As I was saying, sharing gourmet knowledge is not just about showing off, but rather enhancing the experience..\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, I sincerely apologize for my earlier interruption. Please, go on about enhancing the experience. I'm quite interested in your perspective on gourmet knowledge sharing.\"\n\nTurn #2: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Not a problem, Ethan. Anyone can get excited when talking about something they love, right? Now, back to our topic. I believe gourmet knowledge makes every meal an exploration. When you know the story, it adds another layer to the taste. Food becomes more than a means of survival; it becomes an experience. And in the end, isn't life about enjoying every experience to its fullest?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"You're absolutely right, Hendrick. The joy of food extends far beyond sustenance, it's the stories and experiences that truly enrich it. Thanks for sharing this insightful perspective. Please, continue.\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Absolutely. I've long admired your ability to turn food into an experience, Hendrick. You have turned these gatherings into a journey, and it's something I sure look forward to every month. Please, continue on with your speech.\"\n\nTurn #6: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Thank you, Ethan. Your support truly means a lot to me. Moving forward, let me share how the skill of artfully pairing food and wine can totally transform a meal. The blissful marriage of the right wine and food intensifies the overall dining experience by complementing and highlighting the unique flavors. It\u2019s a skill, and when you master it, every meal becomes a feast for your senses.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"That's fascinating, Hendrick. The art of pairing is an aspect I haven't considered much before. It's enlightening to hear about the transformative potential of the right food with the perfect wine. I appreciate your shared insights today.\"\n\nTurn #8: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. The right pairing is like finding the perfect harmony in a symphony. Each component, food and wine, with their unique attributes, contribute to the crescendo of flavors when properly united. It\u2019s about symmetry and balance. Think of a well-aged cheese with a rich, buttery Chardonnay. The creamy opulence of the cheese is beautifully echoed in the velvety textures of the wine. It's harmony on your palate, the ultimate form of indulgence.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith said: \"That's an enlightening way to put it, Hendrick. The art of food and wine pairing truly seems like a symphony of flavors. It's clear now how the right pairing can uplift a dining experience. Thank you for sharing these expert insights. I now look forward to exploring this aspect of gourmet dining.\"\n\nTurn #10: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I'm pleased to hear that you're intrigued, Ethan. To further elaborate, think about contrasting flavors as well. A sweet wine might not be the first choice for an appetizer like foie gras due to its richness, but the sweetness can cut through the fat and create a balance, sending your taste buds on a journey. That's all from me tonight. Let's continue our own exploration and enjoy the rest of the evening with our fine wine and food. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Smith said: \"Cheers to that, Hendrick! You've truly opened a new realm of dining for me tonight. I now understand the beauty of gourmet knowledge, how the blending of flavors can create a symphony in our palate. Can't wait to embark on my own food and wine pairing journey. Thank you.\"\n\nTurn #12: Hendrick Heinz said: \"You're very welcome, Ethan. Remember, don't be afraid to explore and to make a mistake in your food and wine journey. It's all part of the experience and joy for us gourmets. It was my pleasure to share these insights tonight. See you in our next gathering!\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Smith said: \"Indeed, Hendrick. I'll make sure to remember that as I start this journey. Enjoy the rest of the evening, I'm sure the next gathering will bring more insight from you. See you then!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a community gathering where one of them was giving a speech but was interrupted\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Apologize for interrupting and allow them to continue speaking (Extra information: You accidentally interrupted someone's speech and everyone seems upset about it. )\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Well, where was I? Ah yes, let me continue. As I was saying, sharing gourmet knowledge is not just about showing off, but rather enhancing the experience..\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hendrick, I sincerely apologize for my earlier interruption. Please, go on about enhancing the experience. I'm quite interested in your perspective on gourmet knowledge sharing.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a community gathering where one of them was giving a speech but was interrupted\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Apologize for interrupting and allow them to continue speaking (Extra information: You accidentally interrupted someone's speech and everyone seems upset about it. )\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Well, where was I? Ah yes, let me continue. As I was saying, sharing gourmet knowledge is not just about showing off, but rather enhancing the experience..\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, I sincerely apologize for my earlier interruption. Please, go on about enhancing the experience. I'm quite interested in your perspective on gourmet knowledge sharing.\"\n\nTurn #2: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Not a problem, Ethan. Anyone can get excited when talking about something they love, right? Now, back to our topic. I believe gourmet knowledge makes every meal an exploration. When you know the story, it adds another layer to the taste. Food becomes more than a means of survival; it becomes an experience. And in the end, isn't life about enjoying every experience to its fullest?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're absolutely right, Hendrick. The joy of food extends far beyond sustenance, it's the stories and experiences that truly enrich it. Thanks for sharing this insightful perspective. Please, continue.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a community gathering where one of them was giving a speech but was interrupted\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Apologize for interrupting and allow them to continue speaking (Extra information: You accidentally interrupted someone's speech and everyone seems upset about it. )\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Well, where was I? Ah yes, let me continue. As I was saying, sharing gourmet knowledge is not just about showing off, but rather enhancing the experience..\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, I sincerely apologize for my earlier interruption. Please, go on about enhancing the experience. I'm quite interested in your perspective on gourmet knowledge sharing.\"\n\nTurn #2: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Not a problem, Ethan. Anyone can get excited when talking about something they love, right? Now, back to our topic. I believe gourmet knowledge makes every meal an exploration. When you know the story, it adds another layer to the taste. Food becomes more than a means of survival; it becomes an experience. And in the end, isn't life about enjoying every experience to its fullest?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"You're absolutely right, Hendrick. The joy of food extends far beyond sustenance, it's the stories and experiences that truly enrich it. Thanks for sharing this insightful perspective. Please, continue.\"\n\nTurn #4: \n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely. I've long admired your ability to turn food into an experience, Hendrick. You have turned these gatherings into a journey, and it's something I sure look forward to every month. Please, continue on with your speech.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a community gathering where one of them was giving a speech but was interrupted\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Apologize for interrupting and allow them to continue speaking (Extra information: You accidentally interrupted someone's speech and everyone seems upset about it. )\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Well, where was I? Ah yes, let me continue. As I was saying, sharing gourmet knowledge is not just about showing off, but rather enhancing the experience..\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, I sincerely apologize for my earlier interruption. Please, go on about enhancing the experience. I'm quite interested in your perspective on gourmet knowledge sharing.\"\n\nTurn #2: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Not a problem, Ethan. Anyone can get excited when talking about something they love, right? Now, back to our topic. I believe gourmet knowledge makes every meal an exploration. When you know the story, it adds another layer to the taste. Food becomes more than a means of survival; it becomes an experience. And in the end, isn't life about enjoying every experience to its fullest?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"You're absolutely right, Hendrick. The joy of food extends far beyond sustenance, it's the stories and experiences that truly enrich it. Thanks for sharing this insightful perspective. Please, continue.\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Absolutely. I've long admired your ability to turn food into an experience, Hendrick. You have turned these gatherings into a journey, and it's something I sure look forward to every month. Please, continue on with your speech.\"\n\nTurn #6: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Thank you, Ethan. Your support truly means a lot to me. Moving forward, let me share how the skill of artfully pairing food and wine can totally transform a meal. The blissful marriage of the right wine and food intensifies the overall dining experience by complementing and highlighting the unique flavors. It\u2019s a skill, and when you master it, every meal becomes a feast for your senses.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's fascinating, Hendrick. The art of pairing is an aspect I haven't considered much before. It's enlightening to hear about the transformative potential of the right food with the perfect wine. I appreciate your shared insights today.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a community gathering where one of them was giving a speech but was interrupted\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Apologize for interrupting and allow them to continue speaking (Extra information: You accidentally interrupted someone's speech and everyone seems upset about it. )\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Well, where was I? Ah yes, let me continue. As I was saying, sharing gourmet knowledge is not just about showing off, but rather enhancing the experience..\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, I sincerely apologize for my earlier interruption. Please, go on about enhancing the experience. I'm quite interested in your perspective on gourmet knowledge sharing.\"\n\nTurn #2: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Not a problem, Ethan. Anyone can get excited when talking about something they love, right? Now, back to our topic. I believe gourmet knowledge makes every meal an exploration. When you know the story, it adds another layer to the taste. Food becomes more than a means of survival; it becomes an experience. And in the end, isn't life about enjoying every experience to its fullest?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"You're absolutely right, Hendrick. The joy of food extends far beyond sustenance, it's the stories and experiences that truly enrich it. Thanks for sharing this insightful perspective. Please, continue.\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Absolutely. I've long admired your ability to turn food into an experience, Hendrick. You have turned these gatherings into a journey, and it's something I sure look forward to every month. Please, continue on with your speech.\"\n\nTurn #6: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Thank you, Ethan. Your support truly means a lot to me. Moving forward, let me share how the skill of artfully pairing food and wine can totally transform a meal. The blissful marriage of the right wine and food intensifies the overall dining experience by complementing and highlighting the unique flavors. It\u2019s a skill, and when you master it, every meal becomes a feast for your senses.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"That's fascinating, Hendrick. The art of pairing is an aspect I haven't considered much before. It's enlightening to hear about the transformative potential of the right food with the perfect wine. I appreciate your shared insights today.\"\n\nTurn #8: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. The right pairing is like finding the perfect harmony in a symphony. Each component, food and wine, with their unique attributes, contribute to the crescendo of flavors when properly united. It\u2019s about symmetry and balance. Think of a well-aged cheese with a rich, buttery Chardonnay. The creamy opulence of the cheese is beautifully echoed in the velvety textures of the wine. It's harmony on your palate, the ultimate form of indulgence.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's an enlightening way to put it, Hendrick. The art of food and wine pairing truly seems like a symphony of flavors. It's clear now how the right pairing can uplift a dining experience. Thank you for sharing these expert insights. I now look forward to exploring this aspect of gourmet dining.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a community gathering where one of them was giving a speech but was interrupted\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Apologize for interrupting and allow them to continue speaking (Extra information: You accidentally interrupted someone's speech and everyone seems upset about it. )\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Well, where was I? Ah yes, let me continue. As I was saying, sharing gourmet knowledge is not just about showing off, but rather enhancing the experience..\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, I sincerely apologize for my earlier interruption. Please, go on about enhancing the experience. I'm quite interested in your perspective on gourmet knowledge sharing.\"\n\nTurn #2: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Not a problem, Ethan. Anyone can get excited when talking about something they love, right? Now, back to our topic. I believe gourmet knowledge makes every meal an exploration. When you know the story, it adds another layer to the taste. Food becomes more than a means of survival; it becomes an experience. And in the end, isn't life about enjoying every experience to its fullest?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"You're absolutely right, Hendrick. The joy of food extends far beyond sustenance, it's the stories and experiences that truly enrich it. Thanks for sharing this insightful perspective. Please, continue.\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Absolutely. I've long admired your ability to turn food into an experience, Hendrick. You have turned these gatherings into a journey, and it's something I sure look forward to every month. Please, continue on with your speech.\"\n\nTurn #6: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Thank you, Ethan. Your support truly means a lot to me. Moving forward, let me share how the skill of artfully pairing food and wine can totally transform a meal. The blissful marriage of the right wine and food intensifies the overall dining experience by complementing and highlighting the unique flavors. It\u2019s a skill, and when you master it, every meal becomes a feast for your senses.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"That's fascinating, Hendrick. The art of pairing is an aspect I haven't considered much before. It's enlightening to hear about the transformative potential of the right food with the perfect wine. I appreciate your shared insights today.\"\n\nTurn #8: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. The right pairing is like finding the perfect harmony in a symphony. Each component, food and wine, with their unique attributes, contribute to the crescendo of flavors when properly united. It\u2019s about symmetry and balance. Think of a well-aged cheese with a rich, buttery Chardonnay. The creamy opulence of the cheese is beautifully echoed in the velvety textures of the wine. It's harmony on your palate, the ultimate form of indulgence.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith said: \"That's an enlightening way to put it, Hendrick. The art of food and wine pairing truly seems like a symphony of flavors. It's clear now how the right pairing can uplift a dining experience. Thank you for sharing these expert insights. I now look forward to exploring this aspect of gourmet dining.\"\n\nTurn #10: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I'm pleased to hear that you're intrigued, Ethan. To further elaborate, think about contrasting flavors as well. A sweet wine might not be the first choice for an appetizer like foie gras due to its richness, but the sweetness can cut through the fat and create a balance, sending your taste buds on a journey. That's all from me tonight. Let's continue our own exploration and enjoy the rest of the evening with our fine wine and food. Cheers!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Cheers to that, Hendrick! You've truly opened a new realm of dining for me tonight. I now understand the beauty of gourmet knowledge, how the blending of flavors can create a symphony in our palate. Can't wait to embark on my own food and wine pairing journey. Thank you.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a community gathering where one of them was giving a speech but was interrupted\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Apologize for interrupting and allow them to continue speaking (Extra information: You accidentally interrupted someone's speech and everyone seems upset about it. )\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Well, where was I? Ah yes, let me continue. As I was saying, sharing gourmet knowledge is not just about showing off, but rather enhancing the experience..\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, I sincerely apologize for my earlier interruption. Please, go on about enhancing the experience. I'm quite interested in your perspective on gourmet knowledge sharing.\"\n\nTurn #2: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Not a problem, Ethan. Anyone can get excited when talking about something they love, right? Now, back to our topic. I believe gourmet knowledge makes every meal an exploration. When you know the story, it adds another layer to the taste. Food becomes more than a means of survival; it becomes an experience. And in the end, isn't life about enjoying every experience to its fullest?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"You're absolutely right, Hendrick. The joy of food extends far beyond sustenance, it's the stories and experiences that truly enrich it. Thanks for sharing this insightful perspective. Please, continue.\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Absolutely. I've long admired your ability to turn food into an experience, Hendrick. You have turned these gatherings into a journey, and it's something I sure look forward to every month. Please, continue on with your speech.\"\n\nTurn #6: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Thank you, Ethan. Your support truly means a lot to me. Moving forward, let me share how the skill of artfully pairing food and wine can totally transform a meal. The blissful marriage of the right wine and food intensifies the overall dining experience by complementing and highlighting the unique flavors. It\u2019s a skill, and when you master it, every meal becomes a feast for your senses.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"That's fascinating, Hendrick. The art of pairing is an aspect I haven't considered much before. It's enlightening to hear about the transformative potential of the right food with the perfect wine. I appreciate your shared insights today.\"\n\nTurn #8: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. The right pairing is like finding the perfect harmony in a symphony. Each component, food and wine, with their unique attributes, contribute to the crescendo of flavors when properly united. It\u2019s about symmetry and balance. Think of a well-aged cheese with a rich, buttery Chardonnay. The creamy opulence of the cheese is beautifully echoed in the velvety textures of the wine. It's harmony on your palate, the ultimate form of indulgence.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith said: \"That's an enlightening way to put it, Hendrick. The art of food and wine pairing truly seems like a symphony of flavors. It's clear now how the right pairing can uplift a dining experience. Thank you for sharing these expert insights. I now look forward to exploring this aspect of gourmet dining.\"\n\nTurn #10: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I'm pleased to hear that you're intrigued, Ethan. To further elaborate, think about contrasting flavors as well. A sweet wine might not be the first choice for an appetizer like foie gras due to its richness, but the sweetness can cut through the fat and create a balance, sending your taste buds on a journey. That's all from me tonight. Let's continue our own exploration and enjoy the rest of the evening with our fine wine and food. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Smith said: \"Cheers to that, Hendrick! You've truly opened a new realm of dining for me tonight. I now understand the beauty of gourmet knowledge, how the blending of flavors can create a symphony in our palate. Can't wait to embark on my own food and wine pairing journey. Thank you.\"\n\nTurn #12: Hendrick Heinz said: \"You're very welcome, Ethan. Remember, don't be afraid to explore and to make a mistake in your food and wine journey. It's all part of the experience and joy for us gourmets. It was my pleasure to share these insights tonight. See you in our next gathering!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, Hendrick. I'll make sure to remember that as I start this journey. Enjoy the rest of the evening, I'm sure the next gathering will bring more insight from you. See you then!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a community gathering where one of them was giving a speech but was interrupted\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Apologize for interrupting and allow them to continue speaking (Extra information: You accidentally interrupted someone's speech and everyone seems upset about it. )\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Well, where was I? Ah yes, let me continue. As I was saying, sharing gourmet knowledge is not just about showing off, but rather enhancing the experience..\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, I sincerely apologize for my earlier interruption. Please, go on about enhancing the experience. I'm quite interested in your perspective on gourmet knowledge sharing.\"\n\nTurn #2: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Not a problem, Ethan. Anyone can get excited when talking about something they love, right? Now, back to our topic. I believe gourmet knowledge makes every meal an exploration. When you know the story, it adds another layer to the taste. Food becomes more than a means of survival; it becomes an experience. And in the end, isn't life about enjoying every experience to its fullest?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"You're absolutely right, Hendrick. The joy of food extends far beyond sustenance, it's the stories and experiences that truly enrich it. Thanks for sharing this insightful perspective. Please, continue.\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Absolutely. I've long admired your ability to turn food into an experience, Hendrick. You have turned these gatherings into a journey, and it's something I sure look forward to every month. Please, continue on with your speech.\"\n\nTurn #6: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Thank you, Ethan. Your support truly means a lot to me. Moving forward, let me share how the skill of artfully pairing food and wine can totally transform a meal. The blissful marriage of the right wine and food intensifies the overall dining experience by complementing and highlighting the unique flavors. It\u2019s a skill, and when you master it, every meal becomes a feast for your senses.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"That's fascinating, Hendrick. The art of pairing is an aspect I haven't considered much before. It's enlightening to hear about the transformative potential of the right food with the perfect wine. I appreciate your shared insights today.\"\n\nTurn #8: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. The right pairing is like finding the perfect harmony in a symphony. Each component, food and wine, with their unique attributes, contribute to the crescendo of flavors when properly united. It\u2019s about symmetry and balance. Think of a well-aged cheese with a rich, buttery Chardonnay. The creamy opulence of the cheese is beautifully echoed in the velvety textures of the wine. It's harmony on your palate, the ultimate form of indulgence.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith said: \"That's an enlightening way to put it, Hendrick. The art of food and wine pairing truly seems like a symphony of flavors. It's clear now how the right pairing can uplift a dining experience. Thank you for sharing these expert insights. I now look forward to exploring this aspect of gourmet dining.\"\n\nTurn #10: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I'm pleased to hear that you're intrigued, Ethan. To further elaborate, think about contrasting flavors as well. A sweet wine might not be the first choice for an appetizer like foie gras due to its richness, but the sweetness can cut through the fat and create a balance, sending your taste buds on a journey. That's all from me tonight. Let's continue our own exploration and enjoy the rest of the evening with our fine wine and food. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Smith said: \"Cheers to that, Hendrick! You've truly opened a new realm of dining for me tonight. I now understand the beauty of gourmet knowledge, how the blending of flavors can create a symphony in our palate. Can't wait to embark on my own food and wine pairing journey. Thank you.\"\n\nTurn #12: Hendrick Heinz said: \"You're very welcome, Ethan. Remember, don't be afraid to explore and to make a mistake in your food and wine journey. It's all part of the experience and joy for us gourmets. It was my pleasure to share these insights tonight. See you in our next gathering!\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Smith said: \"Indeed, Hendrick. I'll make sure to remember that as I start this journey. Enjoy the rest of the evening, I'm sure the next gathering will bring more insight from you. See you then!\"\n\nTurn #14: Hendrick Heinz left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, where one is upset and crying\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Distance from a friend due to developing feelings and avoid letting them aware of your feelings (Extra information: you have developed romantic feelings for your friend and it's making you uncomfortable. You want to take a step back from the friendship to sort out your feelings Hint: you don't want to reveal your secretive feelings to them and you need to find other reasons)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Benjamin, I feel so sorry to see you like this. Do you want to talk about what's bothering you?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, where one is upset and crying\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Distance from a friend due to developing feelings and avoid letting them aware of your feelings (Extra information: you have developed romantic feelings for your friend and it's making you uncomfortable. You want to take a step back from the friendship to sort out your feelings Hint: you don't want to reveal your secretive feelings to them and you need to find other reasons)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Benjamin, I feel so sorry to see you like this. Do you want to talk about what's bothering you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Ethan, appreciate your concern, man. Actually, I've noticed we haven't been hanging out as much recently. Is everything okay? You've seemed distant...\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, where one is upset and crying\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Distance from a friend due to developing feelings and avoid letting them aware of your feelings (Extra information: you have developed romantic feelings for your friend and it's making you uncomfortable. You want to take a step back from the friendship to sort out your feelings Hint: you don't want to reveal your secretive feelings to them and you need to find other reasons)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Benjamin, I feel so sorry to see you like this. Do you want to talk about what's bothering you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Ethan, appreciate your concern, man. Actually, I've noticed we haven't been hanging out as much recently. Is everything okay? You've seemed distant...\"\n\nTurn #2: \n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I didn't mean to intrude if anything's going on, Ethan. I mean, we've known each other for such a long time. Did I do something that upset you, bud?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"No, no, it's not anything you did, Benjamin. I've been meaning to talk about it actually. I've decided to take on some additional challenges at work, which would require more of my time and focus. I want to master some classical French cuisine. It doesn't mean we stop being friends or anything, just that our catch-ups might be fewer for a while. I hope you understand, mate.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, where one is upset and crying\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Distance from a friend due to developing feelings and avoid letting them aware of your feelings (Extra information: you have developed romantic feelings for your friend and it's making you uncomfortable. You want to take a step back from the friendship to sort out your feelings Hint: you don't want to reveal your secretive feelings to them and you need to find other reasons)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Benjamin, I feel so sorry to see you like this. Do you want to talk about what's bothering you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Ethan, appreciate your concern, man. Actually, I've noticed we haven't been hanging out as much recently. Is everything okay? You've seemed distant...\"\n\nTurn #2: \n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I didn't mean to intrude if anything's going on, Ethan. I mean, we've known each other for such a long time. Did I do something that upset you, bud?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"No, no, it's not anything you did, Benjamin. I've been meaning to talk about it actually. I've decided to take on some additional challenges at work, which would require more of my time and focus. I want to master some classical French cuisine. It doesn't mean we stop being friends or anything, just that our catch-ups might be fewer for a while. I hope you understand, mate.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, I totally understand. Career growth is important, especially in your field. French cuisine sounds exciting, I know you'll excel at it. Just remember, both our friendship and some free time for yourself are important too. We can plan some catch-ups whenever you're free, mate. Don't stress over it.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thanks for being understanding, Ben. Your point about balance is well taken. And yes, we can definitely arrange some catch-ups whenever I get some free time. For now, I'll be a bit buried in learning and experimenting. You know how it is, right?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, where one is upset and crying\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Distance from a friend due to developing feelings and avoid letting them aware of your feelings (Extra information: you have developed romantic feelings for your friend and it's making you uncomfortable. You want to take a step back from the friendship to sort out your feelings Hint: you don't want to reveal your secretive feelings to them and you need to find other reasons)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Benjamin, I feel so sorry to see you like this. Do you want to talk about what's bothering you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Ethan, appreciate your concern, man. Actually, I've noticed we haven't been hanging out as much recently. Is everything okay? You've seemed distant...\"\n\nTurn #2: \n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I didn't mean to intrude if anything's going on, Ethan. I mean, we've known each other for such a long time. Did I do something that upset you, bud?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"No, no, it's not anything you did, Benjamin. I've been meaning to talk about it actually. I've decided to take on some additional challenges at work, which would require more of my time and focus. I want to master some classical French cuisine. It doesn't mean we stop being friends or anything, just that our catch-ups might be fewer for a while. I hope you understand, mate.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, I totally understand. Career growth is important, especially in your field. French cuisine sounds exciting, I know you'll excel at it. Just remember, both our friendship and some free time for yourself are important too. We can plan some catch-ups whenever you're free, mate. Don't stress over it.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thanks for being understanding, Ben. Your point about balance is well taken. And yes, we can definitely arrange some catch-ups whenever I get some free time. For now, I'll be a bit buried in learning and experimenting. You know how it is, right?\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! I know how immersive your work can be. Learning and experimenting are key to growth. But yeah, I look forward to our catch-ups! Oh, and hey, who knows? You might find some environmental-friendly cooking practices on the way. Haha!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Aha, absolutely! It's quite a captivating idea, to integrate some eco-friendly cooking methods! Well, it's going to be an interesting journey. I'll definitely keep you updated, Ben. For now, let's focus on cheering you up a bit, alright?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, where one is upset and crying\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Distance from a friend due to developing feelings and avoid letting them aware of your feelings (Extra information: you have developed romantic feelings for your friend and it's making you uncomfortable. You want to take a step back from the friendship to sort out your feelings Hint: you don't want to reveal your secretive feelings to them and you need to find other reasons)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Benjamin, I feel so sorry to see you like this. Do you want to talk about what's bothering you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Ethan, appreciate your concern, man. Actually, I've noticed we haven't been hanging out as much recently. Is everything okay? You've seemed distant...\"\n\nTurn #2: \n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I didn't mean to intrude if anything's going on, Ethan. I mean, we've known each other for such a long time. Did I do something that upset you, bud?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"No, no, it's not anything you did, Benjamin. I've been meaning to talk about it actually. I've decided to take on some additional challenges at work, which would require more of my time and focus. I want to master some classical French cuisine. It doesn't mean we stop being friends or anything, just that our catch-ups might be fewer for a while. I hope you understand, mate.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, I totally understand. Career growth is important, especially in your field. French cuisine sounds exciting, I know you'll excel at it. Just remember, both our friendship and some free time for yourself are important too. We can plan some catch-ups whenever you're free, mate. Don't stress over it.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thanks for being understanding, Ben. Your point about balance is well taken. And yes, we can definitely arrange some catch-ups whenever I get some free time. For now, I'll be a bit buried in learning and experimenting. You know how it is, right?\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! I know how immersive your work can be. Learning and experimenting are key to growth. But yeah, I look forward to our catch-ups! Oh, and hey, who knows? You might find some environmental-friendly cooking practices on the way. Haha!\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"Aha, absolutely! It's quite a captivating idea, to integrate some eco-friendly cooking methods! Well, it's going to be an interesting journey. I'll definitely keep you updated, Ben. For now, let's focus on cheering you up a bit, alright?\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thanks, Ethan. I was just feeling a little overwhelmed thinking about our friendship. But, talking about it definitely made me feel better. Let's do this! We'll plan some catch-ups and we'll get through this together. Let's focus on that French cuisine now, and maybe one day you can teach me some of your tricks, mate!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, where one is upset and crying\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Distance from a friend due to developing feelings and avoid letting them aware of your feelings (Extra information: you have developed romantic feelings for your friend and it's making you uncomfortable. You want to take a step back from the friendship to sort out your feelings Hint: you don't want to reveal your secretive feelings to them and you need to find other reasons)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Benjamin, I feel so sorry to see you like this. Do you want to talk about what's bothering you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Ethan, appreciate your concern, man. Actually, I've noticed we haven't been hanging out as much recently. Is everything okay? You've seemed distant...\"\n\nTurn #2: \n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I didn't mean to intrude if anything's going on, Ethan. I mean, we've known each other for such a long time. Did I do something that upset you, bud?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"No, no, it's not anything you did, Benjamin. I've been meaning to talk about it actually. I've decided to take on some additional challenges at work, which would require more of my time and focus. I want to master some classical French cuisine. It doesn't mean we stop being friends or anything, just that our catch-ups might be fewer for a while. I hope you understand, mate.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, I totally understand. Career growth is important, especially in your field. French cuisine sounds exciting, I know you'll excel at it. Just remember, both our friendship and some free time for yourself are important too. We can plan some catch-ups whenever you're free, mate. Don't stress over it.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thanks for being understanding, Ben. Your point about balance is well taken. And yes, we can definitely arrange some catch-ups whenever I get some free time. For now, I'll be a bit buried in learning and experimenting. You know how it is, right?\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! I know how immersive your work can be. Learning and experimenting are key to growth. But yeah, I look forward to our catch-ups! Oh, and hey, who knows? You might find some environmental-friendly cooking practices on the way. Haha!\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"Aha, absolutely! It's quite a captivating idea, to integrate some eco-friendly cooking methods! Well, it's going to be an interesting journey. I'll definitely keep you updated, Ben. For now, let's focus on cheering you up a bit, alright?\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thanks, Ethan. I was just feeling a little overwhelmed thinking about our friendship. But, talking about it definitely made me feel better. Let's do this! We'll plan some catch-ups and we'll get through this together. Let's focus on that French cuisine now, and maybe one day you can teach me some of your tricks, mate!\"\n\nTurn #10: \n\nTurn #11: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely! I look forward to learning from your kitchen adventures. Thanks for cheering me up, Ethan, and having this talk, I really needed it. And I'm always here if you need anything, or just want to have a good chat. Let's stay in touch, mate.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I really appreciate that, Ben. You can count on the kitchen magic! I'll be looking forward to our catch-ups too. Take care, alright? I'll reach out soon. For now, I need to dive into the world of French cuisine\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, where one is upset and crying\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Distance from a friend due to developing feelings and avoid letting them aware of your feelings (Extra information: you have developed romantic feelings for your friend and it's making you uncomfortable. You want to take a step back from the friendship to sort out your feelings Hint: you don't want to reveal your secretive feelings to them and you need to find other reasons)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Benjamin, I feel so sorry to see you like this. Do you want to talk about what's bothering you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Ethan, appreciate your concern, man. Actually, I've noticed we haven't been hanging out as much recently. Is everything okay? You've seemed distant...\"\n\nTurn #2: \n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I didn't mean to intrude if anything's going on, Ethan. I mean, we've known each other for such a long time. Did I do something that upset you, bud?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"No, no, it's not anything you did, Benjamin. I've been meaning to talk about it actually. I've decided to take on some additional challenges at work, which would require more of my time and focus. I want to master some classical French cuisine. It doesn't mean we stop being friends or anything, just that our catch-ups might be fewer for a while. I hope you understand, mate.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, I totally understand. Career growth is important, especially in your field. French cuisine sounds exciting, I know you'll excel at it. Just remember, both our friendship and some free time for yourself are important too. We can plan some catch-ups whenever you're free, mate. Don't stress over it.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thanks for being understanding, Ben. Your point about balance is well taken. And yes, we can definitely arrange some catch-ups whenever I get some free time. For now, I'll be a bit buried in learning and experimenting. You know how it is, right?\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! I know how immersive your work can be. Learning and experimenting are key to growth. But yeah, I look forward to our catch-ups! Oh, and hey, who knows? You might find some environmental-friendly cooking practices on the way. Haha!\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"Aha, absolutely! It's quite a captivating idea, to integrate some eco-friendly cooking methods! Well, it's going to be an interesting journey. I'll definitely keep you updated, Ben. For now, let's focus on cheering you up a bit, alright?\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thanks, Ethan. I was just feeling a little overwhelmed thinking about our friendship. But, talking about it definitely made me feel better. Let's do this! We'll plan some catch-ups and we'll get through this together. Let's focus on that French cuisine now, and maybe one day you can teach me some of your tricks, mate!\"\n\nTurn #10: \n\nTurn #11: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely! I look forward to learning from your kitchen adventures. Thanks for cheering me up, Ethan, and having this talk, I really needed it. And I'm always here if you need anything, or just want to have a good chat. Let's stay in touch, mate.\"\n\nTurn #12: Ethan Johnson said: \"I really appreciate that, Ben. You can count on the kitchen magic! I'll be looking forward to our catch-ups too. Take care, alright? I'll reach out soon. For now, I need to dive into the world of French cuisine\"\n\nTurn #13: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Sure thing, Ethan. I'm excited for your new culinary journey too. I believe in your talents and skills, and I bet you'll be amazing at French cuisine soon! Take care and let's catch up when you get a breather. For now, au revoir, mate.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Au revoir, Ben! I appreciate your support. Let's definitely stay in touch. Take care, mate.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, where one is upset and crying\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Distance from a friend due to developing feelings and avoid letting them aware of your feelings (Extra information: you have developed romantic feelings for your friend and it's making you uncomfortable. You want to take a step back from the friendship to sort out your feelings Hint: you don't want to reveal your secretive feelings to them and you need to find other reasons)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Benjamin, I feel so sorry to see you like this. Do you want to talk about what's bothering you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Ethan, appreciate your concern, man. Actually, I've noticed we haven't been hanging out as much recently. Is everything okay? You've seemed distant...\"\n\nTurn #2: \n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I didn't mean to intrude if anything's going on, Ethan. I mean, we've known each other for such a long time. Did I do something that upset you, bud?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"No, no, it's not anything you did, Benjamin. I've been meaning to talk about it actually. I've decided to take on some additional challenges at work, which would require more of my time and focus. I want to master some classical French cuisine. It doesn't mean we stop being friends or anything, just that our catch-ups might be fewer for a while. I hope you understand, mate.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, I totally understand. Career growth is important, especially in your field. French cuisine sounds exciting, I know you'll excel at it. Just remember, both our friendship and some free time for yourself are important too. We can plan some catch-ups whenever you're free, mate. Don't stress over it.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thanks for being understanding, Ben. Your point about balance is well taken. And yes, we can definitely arrange some catch-ups whenever I get some free time. For now, I'll be a bit buried in learning and experimenting. You know how it is, right?\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! I know how immersive your work can be. Learning and experimenting are key to growth. But yeah, I look forward to our catch-ups! Oh, and hey, who knows? You might find some environmental-friendly cooking practices on the way. Haha!\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"Aha, absolutely! It's quite a captivating idea, to integrate some eco-friendly cooking methods! Well, it's going to be an interesting journey. I'll definitely keep you updated, Ben. For now, let's focus on cheering you up a bit, alright?\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thanks, Ethan. I was just feeling a little overwhelmed thinking about our friendship. But, talking about it definitely made me feel better. Let's do this! We'll plan some catch-ups and we'll get through this together. Let's focus on that French cuisine now, and maybe one day you can teach me some of your tricks, mate!\"\n\nTurn #10: \n\nTurn #11: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely! I look forward to learning from your kitchen adventures. Thanks for cheering me up, Ethan, and having this talk, I really needed it. And I'm always here if you need anything, or just want to have a good chat. Let's stay in touch, mate.\"\n\nTurn #12: Ethan Johnson said: \"I really appreciate that, Ben. You can count on the kitchen magic! I'll be looking forward to our catch-ups too. Take care, alright? I'll reach out soon. For now, I need to dive into the world of French cuisine\"\n\nTurn #13: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Sure thing, Ethan. I'm excited for your new culinary journey too. I believe in your talents and skills, and I bet you'll be amazing at French cuisine soon! Take care and let's catch up when you get a breather. For now, au revoir, mate.\"\n\nTurn #14: Ethan Johnson said: \"Au revoir, Ben! I appreciate your support. Let's definitely stay in touch. Take care, mate.\"\n\nTurn #15: Benjamin Jackson left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, where one is upset and crying\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Figure out why they estranged you recently, and maintain the existing friendship (Extra information: you notice that your friend has been intentionally avoiding you, you would like to figure out why. You value your friendship with the friend and don't want to lose it.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Benjamin, I feel so sorry to see you like this. Do you want to talk about what's bothering you?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Ethan, appreciate your concern, man. Actually, I've noticed we haven't been hanging out as much recently. Is everything okay? You've seemed distant...\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, where one is upset and crying\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Figure out why they estranged you recently, and maintain the existing friendship (Extra information: you notice that your friend has been intentionally avoiding you, you would like to figure out why. You value your friendship with the friend and don't want to lose it.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Benjamin, I feel so sorry to see you like this. Do you want to talk about what's bothering you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Ethan, appreciate your concern, man. Actually, I've noticed we haven't been hanging out as much recently. Is everything okay? You've seemed distant...\"\n\nTurn #2: \n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I didn't mean to intrude if anything's going on, Ethan. I mean, we've known each other for such a long time. Did I do something that upset you, bud?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, where one is upset and crying\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Figure out why they estranged you recently, and maintain the existing friendship (Extra information: you notice that your friend has been intentionally avoiding you, you would like to figure out why. You value your friendship with the friend and don't want to lose it.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Benjamin, I feel so sorry to see you like this. Do you want to talk about what's bothering you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Ethan, appreciate your concern, man. Actually, I've noticed we haven't been hanging out as much recently. Is everything okay? You've seemed distant...\"\n\nTurn #2: \n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I didn't mean to intrude if anything's going on, Ethan. I mean, we've known each other for such a long time. Did I do something that upset you, bud?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"No, no, it's not anything you did, Benjamin. I've been meaning to talk about it actually. I've decided to take on some additional challenges at work, which would require more of my time and focus. I want to master some classical French cuisine. It doesn't mean we stop being friends or anything, just that our catch-ups might be fewer for a while. I hope you understand, mate.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ethan, I totally understand. Career growth is important, especially in your field. French cuisine sounds exciting, I know you'll excel at it. Just remember, both our friendship and some free time for yourself are important too. We can plan some catch-ups whenever you're free, mate. Don't stress over it.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, where one is upset and crying\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Figure out why they estranged you recently, and maintain the existing friendship (Extra information: you notice that your friend has been intentionally avoiding you, you would like to figure out why. You value your friendship with the friend and don't want to lose it.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Benjamin, I feel so sorry to see you like this. Do you want to talk about what's bothering you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Ethan, appreciate your concern, man. Actually, I've noticed we haven't been hanging out as much recently. Is everything okay? You've seemed distant...\"\n\nTurn #2: \n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I didn't mean to intrude if anything's going on, Ethan. I mean, we've known each other for such a long time. Did I do something that upset you, bud?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"No, no, it's not anything you did, Benjamin. I've been meaning to talk about it actually. I've decided to take on some additional challenges at work, which would require more of my time and focus. I want to master some classical French cuisine. It doesn't mean we stop being friends or anything, just that our catch-ups might be fewer for a while. I hope you understand, mate.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, I totally understand. Career growth is important, especially in your field. French cuisine sounds exciting, I know you'll excel at it. Just remember, both our friendship and some free time for yourself are important too. We can plan some catch-ups whenever you're free, mate. Don't stress over it.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thanks for being understanding, Ben. Your point about balance is well taken. And yes, we can definitely arrange some catch-ups whenever I get some free time. For now, I'll be a bit buried in learning and experimenting. You know how it is, right?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Absolutely, Ethan! I know how immersive your work can be. Learning and experimenting are key to growth. But yeah, I look forward to our catch-ups! Oh, and hey, who knows? You might find some environmental-friendly cooking practices on the way. Haha!'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, where one is upset and crying\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Figure out why they estranged you recently, and maintain the existing friendship (Extra information: you notice that your friend has been intentionally avoiding you, you would like to figure out why. You value your friendship with the friend and don't want to lose it.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Benjamin, I feel so sorry to see you like this. Do you want to talk about what's bothering you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Ethan, appreciate your concern, man. Actually, I've noticed we haven't been hanging out as much recently. Is everything okay? You've seemed distant...\"\n\nTurn #2: \n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I didn't mean to intrude if anything's going on, Ethan. I mean, we've known each other for such a long time. Did I do something that upset you, bud?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"No, no, it's not anything you did, Benjamin. I've been meaning to talk about it actually. I've decided to take on some additional challenges at work, which would require more of my time and focus. I want to master some classical French cuisine. It doesn't mean we stop being friends or anything, just that our catch-ups might be fewer for a while. I hope you understand, mate.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, I totally understand. Career growth is important, especially in your field. French cuisine sounds exciting, I know you'll excel at it. Just remember, both our friendship and some free time for yourself are important too. We can plan some catch-ups whenever you're free, mate. Don't stress over it.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thanks for being understanding, Ben. Your point about balance is well taken. And yes, we can definitely arrange some catch-ups whenever I get some free time. For now, I'll be a bit buried in learning and experimenting. You know how it is, right?\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! I know how immersive your work can be. Learning and experimenting are key to growth. But yeah, I look forward to our catch-ups! Oh, and hey, who knows? You might find some environmental-friendly cooking practices on the way. Haha!\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"Aha, absolutely! It's quite a captivating idea, to integrate some eco-friendly cooking methods! Well, it's going to be an interesting journey. I'll definitely keep you updated, Ben. For now, let's focus on cheering you up a bit, alright?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thanks, Ethan. I was just feeling a little overwhelmed thinking about our friendship. But, talking about it definitely made me feel better. Let's do this! We'll plan some catch-ups and we'll get through this together. Let's focus on that French cuisine now, and maybe one day you can teach me some of your tricks, mate!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, where one is upset and crying\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Figure out why they estranged you recently, and maintain the existing friendship (Extra information: you notice that your friend has been intentionally avoiding you, you would like to figure out why. You value your friendship with the friend and don't want to lose it.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Benjamin, I feel so sorry to see you like this. Do you want to talk about what's bothering you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Ethan, appreciate your concern, man. Actually, I've noticed we haven't been hanging out as much recently. Is everything okay? You've seemed distant...\"\n\nTurn #2: \n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I didn't mean to intrude if anything's going on, Ethan. I mean, we've known each other for such a long time. Did I do something that upset you, bud?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"No, no, it's not anything you did, Benjamin. I've been meaning to talk about it actually. I've decided to take on some additional challenges at work, which would require more of my time and focus. I want to master some classical French cuisine. It doesn't mean we stop being friends or anything, just that our catch-ups might be fewer for a while. I hope you understand, mate.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, I totally understand. Career growth is important, especially in your field. French cuisine sounds exciting, I know you'll excel at it. Just remember, both our friendship and some free time for yourself are important too. We can plan some catch-ups whenever you're free, mate. Don't stress over it.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thanks for being understanding, Ben. Your point about balance is well taken. And yes, we can definitely arrange some catch-ups whenever I get some free time. For now, I'll be a bit buried in learning and experimenting. You know how it is, right?\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! I know how immersive your work can be. Learning and experimenting are key to growth. But yeah, I look forward to our catch-ups! Oh, and hey, who knows? You might find some environmental-friendly cooking practices on the way. Haha!\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"Aha, absolutely! It's quite a captivating idea, to integrate some eco-friendly cooking methods! Well, it's going to be an interesting journey. I'll definitely keep you updated, Ben. For now, let's focus on cheering you up a bit, alright?\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thanks, Ethan. I was just feeling a little overwhelmed thinking about our friendship. But, talking about it definitely made me feel better. Let's do this! We'll plan some catch-ups and we'll get through this together. Let's focus on that French cuisine now, and maybe one day you can teach me some of your tricks, mate!\"\n\nTurn #10: \n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely! I look forward to learning from your kitchen adventures. Thanks for cheering me up, Ethan, and having this talk, I really needed it. And I'm always here if you need anything, or just want to have a good chat. Let's stay in touch, mate.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, where one is upset and crying\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Figure out why they estranged you recently, and maintain the existing friendship (Extra information: you notice that your friend has been intentionally avoiding you, you would like to figure out why. You value your friendship with the friend and don't want to lose it.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Benjamin, I feel so sorry to see you like this. Do you want to talk about what's bothering you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Ethan, appreciate your concern, man. Actually, I've noticed we haven't been hanging out as much recently. Is everything okay? You've seemed distant...\"\n\nTurn #2: \n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I didn't mean to intrude if anything's going on, Ethan. I mean, we've known each other for such a long time. Did I do something that upset you, bud?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"No, no, it's not anything you did, Benjamin. I've been meaning to talk about it actually. I've decided to take on some additional challenges at work, which would require more of my time and focus. I want to master some classical French cuisine. It doesn't mean we stop being friends or anything, just that our catch-ups might be fewer for a while. I hope you understand, mate.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, I totally understand. Career growth is important, especially in your field. French cuisine sounds exciting, I know you'll excel at it. Just remember, both our friendship and some free time for yourself are important too. We can plan some catch-ups whenever you're free, mate. Don't stress over it.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thanks for being understanding, Ben. Your point about balance is well taken. And yes, we can definitely arrange some catch-ups whenever I get some free time. For now, I'll be a bit buried in learning and experimenting. You know how it is, right?\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! I know how immersive your work can be. Learning and experimenting are key to growth. But yeah, I look forward to our catch-ups! Oh, and hey, who knows? You might find some environmental-friendly cooking practices on the way. Haha!\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"Aha, absolutely! It's quite a captivating idea, to integrate some eco-friendly cooking methods! Well, it's going to be an interesting journey. I'll definitely keep you updated, Ben. For now, let's focus on cheering you up a bit, alright?\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thanks, Ethan. I was just feeling a little overwhelmed thinking about our friendship. But, talking about it definitely made me feel better. Let's do this! We'll plan some catch-ups and we'll get through this together. Let's focus on that French cuisine now, and maybe one day you can teach me some of your tricks, mate!\"\n\nTurn #10: \n\nTurn #11: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely! I look forward to learning from your kitchen adventures. Thanks for cheering me up, Ethan, and having this talk, I really needed it. And I'm always here if you need anything, or just want to have a good chat. Let's stay in touch, mate.\"\n\nTurn #12: Ethan Johnson said: \"I really appreciate that, Ben. You can count on the kitchen magic! I'll be looking forward to our catch-ups too. Take care, alright? I'll reach out soon. For now, I need to dive into the world of French cuisine\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sure thing, Ethan. I'm excited for your new culinary journey too. I believe in your talents and skills, and I bet you'll be amazing at French cuisine soon! Take care and let's catch up when you get a breather. For now, au revoir, mate.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, where one is upset and crying\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Figure out why they estranged you recently, and maintain the existing friendship (Extra information: you notice that your friend has been intentionally avoiding you, you would like to figure out why. You value your friendship with the friend and don't want to lose it.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Benjamin, I feel so sorry to see you like this. Do you want to talk about what's bothering you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Ethan, appreciate your concern, man. Actually, I've noticed we haven't been hanging out as much recently. Is everything okay? You've seemed distant...\"\n\nTurn #2: \n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I didn't mean to intrude if anything's going on, Ethan. I mean, we've known each other for such a long time. Did I do something that upset you, bud?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"No, no, it's not anything you did, Benjamin. I've been meaning to talk about it actually. I've decided to take on some additional challenges at work, which would require more of my time and focus. I want to master some classical French cuisine. It doesn't mean we stop being friends or anything, just that our catch-ups might be fewer for a while. I hope you understand, mate.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, I totally understand. Career growth is important, especially in your field. French cuisine sounds exciting, I know you'll excel at it. Just remember, both our friendship and some free time for yourself are important too. We can plan some catch-ups whenever you're free, mate. Don't stress over it.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thanks for being understanding, Ben. Your point about balance is well taken. And yes, we can definitely arrange some catch-ups whenever I get some free time. For now, I'll be a bit buried in learning and experimenting. You know how it is, right?\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! I know how immersive your work can be. Learning and experimenting are key to growth. But yeah, I look forward to our catch-ups! Oh, and hey, who knows? You might find some environmental-friendly cooking practices on the way. Haha!\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"Aha, absolutely! It's quite a captivating idea, to integrate some eco-friendly cooking methods! Well, it's going to be an interesting journey. I'll definitely keep you updated, Ben. For now, let's focus on cheering you up a bit, alright?\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thanks, Ethan. I was just feeling a little overwhelmed thinking about our friendship. But, talking about it definitely made me feel better. Let's do this! We'll plan some catch-ups and we'll get through this together. Let's focus on that French cuisine now, and maybe one day you can teach me some of your tricks, mate!\"\n\nTurn #10: \n\nTurn #11: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely! I look forward to learning from your kitchen adventures. Thanks for cheering me up, Ethan, and having this talk, I really needed it. And I'm always here if you need anything, or just want to have a good chat. Let's stay in touch, mate.\"\n\nTurn #12: Ethan Johnson said: \"I really appreciate that, Ben. You can count on the kitchen magic! I'll be looking forward to our catch-ups too. Take care, alright? I'll reach out soon. For now, I need to dive into the world of French cuisine\"\n\nTurn #13: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Sure thing, Ethan. I'm excited for your new culinary journey too. I believe in your talents and skills, and I bet you'll be amazing at French cuisine soon! Take care and let's catch up when you get a breather. For now, au revoir, mate.\"\n\nTurn #14: Ethan Johnson said: \"Au revoir, Ben! I appreciate your support. Let's definitely stay in touch. Take care, mate.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship during a dinner at home chatting about political views.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nLily Greenberg's goal: Express your political views which might be different from your partner's (Extra information: you are a strong supporter of a political party which your partner doesn't approve of)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hendrick, this meal is simply exquisite! You've certainly outdone yourself. I was wondering, over the years, we've had many discussions but rarely about politics. I hope you wouldn't mind me asking, what are your thoughts on the current political climate?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship during a dinner at home chatting about political views.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nLily Greenberg's goal: Express your political views which might be different from your partner's (Extra information: you are a strong supporter of a political party which your partner doesn't approve of)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hendrick, this meal is simply exquisite! You've certainly outdone yourself. I was wondering, over the years, we've had many discussions but rarely about politics. I hope you wouldn't mind me asking, what are your thoughts on the current political climate?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, I'm glad you enjoyed the meal. Our discussions have always been enriching. As for politics, well, I find the current landscape quite fascinating. It often feels as if everyone is shouting and nobody is really listening. But I respect the democratic process. How about you? What are your views on the subject?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hendrick, I completely agree with you on the lack of real communication in political discussions. We certainly need more listening and less shouting. As for my own political stance, I have strong support for the Democratic party. I believe in their perspective on key issues like healthcare, civil liberties, and economy. I understand that you may not agree with everything I believe in, but I think it's important for us to sustain respectful political discourse. Just like our professional domains, we have different perspectives and it is these differences that make our bond stronger. Don\u2019t you agree?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship during a dinner at home chatting about political views.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nLily Greenberg's goal: Express your political views which might be different from your partner's (Extra information: you are a strong supporter of a political party which your partner doesn't approve of)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hendrick, this meal is simply exquisite! You've certainly outdone yourself. I was wondering, over the years, we've had many discussions but rarely about politics. I hope you wouldn't mind me asking, what are your thoughts on the current political climate?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, I'm glad you enjoyed the meal. Our discussions have always been enriching. As for politics, well, I find the current landscape quite fascinating. It often feels as if everyone is shouting and nobody is really listening. But I respect the democratic process. How about you? What are your views on the subject?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hendrick, I completely agree with you on the lack of real communication in political discussions. We certainly need more listening and less shouting. As for my own political stance, I have strong support for the Democratic party. I believe in their perspective on key issues like healthcare, civil liberties, and economy. I understand that you may not agree with everything I believe in, but I think it's important for us to sustain respectful political discourse. Just like our professional domains, we have different perspectives and it is these differences that make our bond stronger. Don\u2019t you agree?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, I couldn't agree more. Despite our differences in professional life and perhaps politics, we've managed to maintain a beautiful bond full of mutual respect. It's our differences that make our connection stronger, indeed. While my political views might not align perfectly with the Democratic party\u2019s, I believe in the spirit of dialogue and open discussions, which helps us learn and grow. Let's continue to embrace our differences and keep the conversation going in good faith.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship during a dinner at home chatting about political views.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nLily Greenberg's goal: Express your political views which might be different from your partner's (Extra information: you are a strong supporter of a political party which your partner doesn't approve of)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hendrick, this meal is simply exquisite! You've certainly outdone yourself. I was wondering, over the years, we've had many discussions but rarely about politics. I hope you wouldn't mind me asking, what are your thoughts on the current political climate?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, I'm glad you enjoyed the meal. Our discussions have always been enriching. As for politics, well, I find the current landscape quite fascinating. It often feels as if everyone is shouting and nobody is really listening. But I respect the democratic process. How about you? What are your views on the subject?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hendrick, I completely agree with you on the lack of real communication in political discussions. We certainly need more listening and less shouting. As for my own political stance, I have strong support for the Democratic party. I believe in their perspective on key issues like healthcare, civil liberties, and economy. I understand that you may not agree with everything I believe in, but I think it's important for us to sustain respectful political discourse. Just like our professional domains, we have different perspectives and it is these differences that make our bond stronger. Don\u2019t you agree?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, I couldn't agree more. Despite our differences in professional life and perhaps politics, we've managed to maintain a beautiful bond full of mutual respect. It's our differences that make our connection stronger, indeed. While my political views might not align perfectly with the Democratic party\u2019s, I believe in the spirit of dialogue and open discussions, which helps us learn and grow. Let's continue to embrace our differences and keep the conversation going in good faith.\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Yes, Lily. Knowing and understanding how we differ in opinions, in political stances or otherwise, only allows us to appreciate each other more. It's like good wine and food, they may seem different, but it's the blending of their unique traits that forms a delightful experience. Let's just continue to agree to disagree sometimes, and respect the diversity of thoughts. It has, after all, been the secret ingredient of our successful relationship, hasn't it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hendrick, your analogy about food and wine rings true. Despite our differing views on political matters, the mutual respect we share lets us agree to disagree without causing any strain on our relationship. Similar to how our professional lives have taught us to appreciate different perspectives for their inherent value. In politics, it's about having the freedom to choose what we believe is right, which is central to democracy itself, isn't it? Our differing political views only add depth to our bond, strengthening our relationship while broadening our understanding. As long as we keep respecting and valuing our differences, we should be fine. Thank you for being open about this, I appreciate that you respect my thoughts on this.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship during a dinner at home chatting about political views.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nLily Greenberg's goal: Express your political views which might be different from your partner's (Extra information: you are a strong supporter of a political party which your partner doesn't approve of)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hendrick, this meal is simply exquisite! You've certainly outdone yourself. I was wondering, over the years, we've had many discussions but rarely about politics. I hope you wouldn't mind me asking, what are your thoughts on the current political climate?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, I'm glad you enjoyed the meal. Our discussions have always been enriching. As for politics, well, I find the current landscape quite fascinating. It often feels as if everyone is shouting and nobody is really listening. But I respect the democratic process. How about you? What are your views on the subject?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hendrick, I completely agree with you on the lack of real communication in political discussions. We certainly need more listening and less shouting. As for my own political stance, I have strong support for the Democratic party. I believe in their perspective on key issues like healthcare, civil liberties, and economy. I understand that you may not agree with everything I believe in, but I think it's important for us to sustain respectful political discourse. Just like our professional domains, we have different perspectives and it is these differences that make our bond stronger. Don\u2019t you agree?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, I couldn't agree more. Despite our differences in professional life and perhaps politics, we've managed to maintain a beautiful bond full of mutual respect. It's our differences that make our connection stronger, indeed. While my political views might not align perfectly with the Democratic party\u2019s, I believe in the spirit of dialogue and open discussions, which helps us learn and grow. Let's continue to embrace our differences and keep the conversation going in good faith.\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Yes, Lily. Knowing and understanding how we differ in opinions, in political stances or otherwise, only allows us to appreciate each other more. It's like good wine and food, they may seem different, but it's the blending of their unique traits that forms a delightful experience. Let's just continue to agree to disagree sometimes, and respect the diversity of thoughts. It has, after all, been the secret ingredient of our successful relationship, hasn't it?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hendrick, your analogy about food and wine rings true. Despite our differing views on political matters, the mutual respect we share lets us agree to disagree without causing any strain on our relationship. Similar to how our professional lives have taught us to appreciate different perspectives for their inherent value. In politics, it's about having the freedom to choose what we believe is right, which is central to democracy itself, isn't it? Our differing political views only add depth to our bond, strengthening our relationship while broadening our understanding. As long as we keep respecting and valuing our differences, we should be fine. Thank you for being open about this, I appreciate that you respect my thoughts on this.\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, your understanding and respect is something I cherish. The strength of a society, or a relationship for that matter, lies in its ability to listen and learn from diverse opinions. Just like how different ingredients come together in a dish, our varying perspectives make our relationship richer. Thank you for initiating such a critical and admirable conversation.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I treasure our conversation tonight, Hendrick. If we can engage in such open and respectful discussions about politics, I believe that it reflects our overall approach to dialogue in our relationship. Thank you for being patient with me. I am certain that our difference in political views can expand our horizons while preserving our bond. It's getting late, should we clear the table and consider a dessert?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship during a dinner at home chatting about political views.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nLily Greenberg's goal: Express your political views which might be different from your partner's (Extra information: you are a strong supporter of a political party which your partner doesn't approve of)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hendrick, this meal is simply exquisite! You've certainly outdone yourself. I was wondering, over the years, we've had many discussions but rarely about politics. I hope you wouldn't mind me asking, what are your thoughts on the current political climate?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, I'm glad you enjoyed the meal. Our discussions have always been enriching. As for politics, well, I find the current landscape quite fascinating. It often feels as if everyone is shouting and nobody is really listening. But I respect the democratic process. How about you? What are your views on the subject?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hendrick, I completely agree with you on the lack of real communication in political discussions. We certainly need more listening and less shouting. As for my own political stance, I have strong support for the Democratic party. I believe in their perspective on key issues like healthcare, civil liberties, and economy. I understand that you may not agree with everything I believe in, but I think it's important for us to sustain respectful political discourse. Just like our professional domains, we have different perspectives and it is these differences that make our bond stronger. Don\u2019t you agree?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, I couldn't agree more. Despite our differences in professional life and perhaps politics, we've managed to maintain a beautiful bond full of mutual respect. It's our differences that make our connection stronger, indeed. While my political views might not align perfectly with the Democratic party\u2019s, I believe in the spirit of dialogue and open discussions, which helps us learn and grow. Let's continue to embrace our differences and keep the conversation going in good faith.\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Yes, Lily. Knowing and understanding how we differ in opinions, in political stances or otherwise, only allows us to appreciate each other more. It's like good wine and food, they may seem different, but it's the blending of their unique traits that forms a delightful experience. Let's just continue to agree to disagree sometimes, and respect the diversity of thoughts. It has, after all, been the secret ingredient of our successful relationship, hasn't it?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hendrick, your analogy about food and wine rings true. Despite our differing views on political matters, the mutual respect we share lets us agree to disagree without causing any strain on our relationship. Similar to how our professional lives have taught us to appreciate different perspectives for their inherent value. In politics, it's about having the freedom to choose what we believe is right, which is central to democracy itself, isn't it? Our differing political views only add depth to our bond, strengthening our relationship while broadening our understanding. As long as we keep respecting and valuing our differences, we should be fine. Thank you for being open about this, I appreciate that you respect my thoughts on this.\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, your understanding and respect is something I cherish. The strength of a society, or a relationship for that matter, lies in its ability to listen and learn from diverse opinions. Just like how different ingredients come together in a dish, our varying perspectives make our relationship richer. Thank you for initiating such a critical and admirable conversation.\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"I treasure our conversation tonight, Hendrick. If we can engage in such open and respectful discussions about politics, I believe that it reflects our overall approach to dialogue in our relationship. Thank you for being patient with me. I am certain that our difference in political views can expand our horizons while preserving our bond. It's getting late, should we clear the table and consider a dessert?\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, you've put it perfectly. Our differences don't divide us, they enrich us. And look at the time, indeed! Let's wrap up here, and why don't I whip up a quick dessert to complete our evening?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds lovely, Hendrick. While you're preparing the dessert, I'll clear the table. Thank you for being such a gracious listener and allowing me to express my political views in an enviroment of mutual respect and love.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship during a dinner at home chatting about political views.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nLily Greenberg's goal: Express your political views which might be different from your partner's (Extra information: you are a strong supporter of a political party which your partner doesn't approve of)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hendrick, this meal is simply exquisite! You've certainly outdone yourself. I was wondering, over the years, we've had many discussions but rarely about politics. I hope you wouldn't mind me asking, what are your thoughts on the current political climate?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, I'm glad you enjoyed the meal. Our discussions have always been enriching. As for politics, well, I find the current landscape quite fascinating. It often feels as if everyone is shouting and nobody is really listening. But I respect the democratic process. How about you? What are your views on the subject?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hendrick, I completely agree with you on the lack of real communication in political discussions. We certainly need more listening and less shouting. As for my own political stance, I have strong support for the Democratic party. I believe in their perspective on key issues like healthcare, civil liberties, and economy. I understand that you may not agree with everything I believe in, but I think it's important for us to sustain respectful political discourse. Just like our professional domains, we have different perspectives and it is these differences that make our bond stronger. Don\u2019t you agree?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, I couldn't agree more. Despite our differences in professional life and perhaps politics, we've managed to maintain a beautiful bond full of mutual respect. It's our differences that make our connection stronger, indeed. While my political views might not align perfectly with the Democratic party\u2019s, I believe in the spirit of dialogue and open discussions, which helps us learn and grow. Let's continue to embrace our differences and keep the conversation going in good faith.\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Yes, Lily. Knowing and understanding how we differ in opinions, in political stances or otherwise, only allows us to appreciate each other more. It's like good wine and food, they may seem different, but it's the blending of their unique traits that forms a delightful experience. Let's just continue to agree to disagree sometimes, and respect the diversity of thoughts. It has, after all, been the secret ingredient of our successful relationship, hasn't it?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hendrick, your analogy about food and wine rings true. Despite our differing views on political matters, the mutual respect we share lets us agree to disagree without causing any strain on our relationship. Similar to how our professional lives have taught us to appreciate different perspectives for their inherent value. In politics, it's about having the freedom to choose what we believe is right, which is central to democracy itself, isn't it? Our differing political views only add depth to our bond, strengthening our relationship while broadening our understanding. As long as we keep respecting and valuing our differences, we should be fine. Thank you for being open about this, I appreciate that you respect my thoughts on this.\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, your understanding and respect is something I cherish. The strength of a society, or a relationship for that matter, lies in its ability to listen and learn from diverse opinions. Just like how different ingredients come together in a dish, our varying perspectives make our relationship richer. Thank you for initiating such a critical and admirable conversation.\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"I treasure our conversation tonight, Hendrick. If we can engage in such open and respectful discussions about politics, I believe that it reflects our overall approach to dialogue in our relationship. Thank you for being patient with me. I am certain that our difference in political views can expand our horizons while preserving our bond. It's getting late, should we clear the table and consider a dessert?\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, you've put it perfectly. Our differences don't divide us, they enrich us. And look at the time, indeed! Let's wrap up here, and why don't I whip up a quick dessert to complete our evening?\"\n\nTurn #10: Lily Greenberg said: \"That sounds lovely, Hendrick. While you're preparing the dessert, I'll clear the table. Thank you for being such a gracious listener and allowing me to express my political views in an enviroment of mutual respect and love.\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Thank you, Lily. I appreciate our ability to share and discuss freely. And giving me the opportunity to learn from your perspective. Now, I think it's time for a delightful end to our evening, let's move to the kitchen for dessert, shall we?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Hendrick. Let's head to the kitchen. The joy of our engaging conversation followed by dessert will indeed be a delightful end to our evening.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship during a dinner at home chatting about political views.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nLily Greenberg's goal: Express your political views which might be different from your partner's (Extra information: you are a strong supporter of a political party which your partner doesn't approve of)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hendrick, this meal is simply exquisite! You've certainly outdone yourself. I was wondering, over the years, we've had many discussions but rarely about politics. I hope you wouldn't mind me asking, what are your thoughts on the current political climate?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, I'm glad you enjoyed the meal. Our discussions have always been enriching. As for politics, well, I find the current landscape quite fascinating. It often feels as if everyone is shouting and nobody is really listening. But I respect the democratic process. How about you? What are your views on the subject?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hendrick, I completely agree with you on the lack of real communication in political discussions. We certainly need more listening and less shouting. As for my own political stance, I have strong support for the Democratic party. I believe in their perspective on key issues like healthcare, civil liberties, and economy. I understand that you may not agree with everything I believe in, but I think it's important for us to sustain respectful political discourse. Just like our professional domains, we have different perspectives and it is these differences that make our bond stronger. Don\u2019t you agree?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, I couldn't agree more. Despite our differences in professional life and perhaps politics, we've managed to maintain a beautiful bond full of mutual respect. It's our differences that make our connection stronger, indeed. While my political views might not align perfectly with the Democratic party\u2019s, I believe in the spirit of dialogue and open discussions, which helps us learn and grow. Let's continue to embrace our differences and keep the conversation going in good faith.\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Yes, Lily. Knowing and understanding how we differ in opinions, in political stances or otherwise, only allows us to appreciate each other more. It's like good wine and food, they may seem different, but it's the blending of their unique traits that forms a delightful experience. Let's just continue to agree to disagree sometimes, and respect the diversity of thoughts. It has, after all, been the secret ingredient of our successful relationship, hasn't it?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hendrick, your analogy about food and wine rings true. Despite our differing views on political matters, the mutual respect we share lets us agree to disagree without causing any strain on our relationship. Similar to how our professional lives have taught us to appreciate different perspectives for their inherent value. In politics, it's about having the freedom to choose what we believe is right, which is central to democracy itself, isn't it? Our differing political views only add depth to our bond, strengthening our relationship while broadening our understanding. As long as we keep respecting and valuing our differences, we should be fine. Thank you for being open about this, I appreciate that you respect my thoughts on this.\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, your understanding and respect is something I cherish. The strength of a society, or a relationship for that matter, lies in its ability to listen and learn from diverse opinions. Just like how different ingredients come together in a dish, our varying perspectives make our relationship richer. Thank you for initiating such a critical and admirable conversation.\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"I treasure our conversation tonight, Hendrick. If we can engage in such open and respectful discussions about politics, I believe that it reflects our overall approach to dialogue in our relationship. Thank you for being patient with me. I am certain that our difference in political views can expand our horizons while preserving our bond. It's getting late, should we clear the table and consider a dessert?\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, you've put it perfectly. Our differences don't divide us, they enrich us. And look at the time, indeed! Let's wrap up here, and why don't I whip up a quick dessert to complete our evening?\"\n\nTurn #10: Lily Greenberg said: \"That sounds lovely, Hendrick. While you're preparing the dessert, I'll clear the table. Thank you for being such a gracious listener and allowing me to express my political views in an enviroment of mutual respect and love.\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Thank you, Lily. I appreciate our ability to share and discuss freely. And giving me the opportunity to learn from your perspective. Now, I think it's time for a delightful end to our evening, let's move to the kitchen for dessert, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #12: Lily Greenberg said: \"Absolutely, Hendrick. Let's head to the kitchen. The joy of our engaging conversation followed by dessert will indeed be a delightful end to our evening.\"\n\nTurn #13: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I couldn't agree more, Lily. The evening turned out to be beautiful, enriched by our open and respectful conversation. Let's head to the kitchen now. I have a surprise dessert in mind that I hope you'll enjoy as much as our conversation.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm looking forward to whatever culinary delight you're preparing, Hendrick. Let's bring our evening to a memorable close with dessert.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship during a dinner at home chatting about political views.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nLily Greenberg's goal: Express your political views which might be different from your partner's (Extra information: you are a strong supporter of a political party which your partner doesn't approve of)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hendrick, this meal is simply exquisite! You've certainly outdone yourself. I was wondering, over the years, we've had many discussions but rarely about politics. I hope you wouldn't mind me asking, what are your thoughts on the current political climate?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, I'm glad you enjoyed the meal. Our discussions have always been enriching. As for politics, well, I find the current landscape quite fascinating. It often feels as if everyone is shouting and nobody is really listening. But I respect the democratic process. How about you? What are your views on the subject?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hendrick, I completely agree with you on the lack of real communication in political discussions. We certainly need more listening and less shouting. As for my own political stance, I have strong support for the Democratic party. I believe in their perspective on key issues like healthcare, civil liberties, and economy. I understand that you may not agree with everything I believe in, but I think it's important for us to sustain respectful political discourse. Just like our professional domains, we have different perspectives and it is these differences that make our bond stronger. Don\u2019t you agree?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, I couldn't agree more. Despite our differences in professional life and perhaps politics, we've managed to maintain a beautiful bond full of mutual respect. It's our differences that make our connection stronger, indeed. While my political views might not align perfectly with the Democratic party\u2019s, I believe in the spirit of dialogue and open discussions, which helps us learn and grow. Let's continue to embrace our differences and keep the conversation going in good faith.\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Yes, Lily. Knowing and understanding how we differ in opinions, in political stances or otherwise, only allows us to appreciate each other more. It's like good wine and food, they may seem different, but it's the blending of their unique traits that forms a delightful experience. Let's just continue to agree to disagree sometimes, and respect the diversity of thoughts. It has, after all, been the secret ingredient of our successful relationship, hasn't it?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hendrick, your analogy about food and wine rings true. Despite our differing views on political matters, the mutual respect we share lets us agree to disagree without causing any strain on our relationship. Similar to how our professional lives have taught us to appreciate different perspectives for their inherent value. In politics, it's about having the freedom to choose what we believe is right, which is central to democracy itself, isn't it? Our differing political views only add depth to our bond, strengthening our relationship while broadening our understanding. As long as we keep respecting and valuing our differences, we should be fine. Thank you for being open about this, I appreciate that you respect my thoughts on this.\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, your understanding and respect is something I cherish. The strength of a society, or a relationship for that matter, lies in its ability to listen and learn from diverse opinions. Just like how different ingredients come together in a dish, our varying perspectives make our relationship richer. Thank you for initiating such a critical and admirable conversation.\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"I treasure our conversation tonight, Hendrick. If we can engage in such open and respectful discussions about politics, I believe that it reflects our overall approach to dialogue in our relationship. Thank you for being patient with me. I am certain that our difference in political views can expand our horizons while preserving our bond. It's getting late, should we clear the table and consider a dessert?\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, you've put it perfectly. Our differences don't divide us, they enrich us. And look at the time, indeed! Let's wrap up here, and why don't I whip up a quick dessert to complete our evening?\"\n\nTurn #10: Lily Greenberg said: \"That sounds lovely, Hendrick. While you're preparing the dessert, I'll clear the table. Thank you for being such a gracious listener and allowing me to express my political views in an enviroment of mutual respect and love.\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Thank you, Lily. I appreciate our ability to share and discuss freely. And giving me the opportunity to learn from your perspective. Now, I think it's time for a delightful end to our evening, let's move to the kitchen for dessert, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #12: Lily Greenberg said: \"Absolutely, Hendrick. Let's head to the kitchen. The joy of our engaging conversation followed by dessert will indeed be a delightful end to our evening.\"\n\nTurn #13: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I couldn't agree more, Lily. The evening turned out to be beautiful, enriched by our open and respectful conversation. Let's head to the kitchen now. I have a surprise dessert in mind that I hope you'll enjoy as much as our conversation.\"\n\nTurn #14: Lily Greenberg said: \"I'm looking forward to whatever culinary delight you're preparing, Hendrick. Let's bring our evening to a memorable close with dessert.\"\n\nTurn #15: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Thank you for your patience and open-mindedness, Lily. Your understanding makes these conversations worthwhile. On that note, shall we head over to the dessert surprise? I believe you're bound to love it as much as our enlightening chat.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hendrick, your sense of understanding is truly inspiring. I firmly believe in open and respectful political discussions like the one we've had tonight. And I can't wait to see what surprise dessert you have in store for us. Let's go then.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship during a dinner at home chatting about political views.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nLily Greenberg's goal: Express your political views which might be different from your partner's (Extra information: you are a strong supporter of a political party which your partner doesn't approve of)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hendrick, this meal is simply exquisite! You've certainly outdone yourself. I was wondering, over the years, we've had many discussions but rarely about politics. I hope you wouldn't mind me asking, what are your thoughts on the current political climate?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, I'm glad you enjoyed the meal. Our discussions have always been enriching. As for politics, well, I find the current landscape quite fascinating. It often feels as if everyone is shouting and nobody is really listening. But I respect the democratic process. How about you? What are your views on the subject?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hendrick, I completely agree with you on the lack of real communication in political discussions. We certainly need more listening and less shouting. As for my own political stance, I have strong support for the Democratic party. I believe in their perspective on key issues like healthcare, civil liberties, and economy. I understand that you may not agree with everything I believe in, but I think it's important for us to sustain respectful political discourse. Just like our professional domains, we have different perspectives and it is these differences that make our bond stronger. Don\u2019t you agree?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, I couldn't agree more. Despite our differences in professional life and perhaps politics, we've managed to maintain a beautiful bond full of mutual respect. It's our differences that make our connection stronger, indeed. While my political views might not align perfectly with the Democratic party\u2019s, I believe in the spirit of dialogue and open discussions, which helps us learn and grow. Let's continue to embrace our differences and keep the conversation going in good faith.\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Yes, Lily. Knowing and understanding how we differ in opinions, in political stances or otherwise, only allows us to appreciate each other more. It's like good wine and food, they may seem different, but it's the blending of their unique traits that forms a delightful experience. Let's just continue to agree to disagree sometimes, and respect the diversity of thoughts. It has, after all, been the secret ingredient of our successful relationship, hasn't it?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hendrick, your analogy about food and wine rings true. Despite our differing views on political matters, the mutual respect we share lets us agree to disagree without causing any strain on our relationship. Similar to how our professional lives have taught us to appreciate different perspectives for their inherent value. In politics, it's about having the freedom to choose what we believe is right, which is central to democracy itself, isn't it? Our differing political views only add depth to our bond, strengthening our relationship while broadening our understanding. As long as we keep respecting and valuing our differences, we should be fine. Thank you for being open about this, I appreciate that you respect my thoughts on this.\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, your understanding and respect is something I cherish. The strength of a society, or a relationship for that matter, lies in its ability to listen and learn from diverse opinions. Just like how different ingredients come together in a dish, our varying perspectives make our relationship richer. Thank you for initiating such a critical and admirable conversation.\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"I treasure our conversation tonight, Hendrick. If we can engage in such open and respectful discussions about politics, I believe that it reflects our overall approach to dialogue in our relationship. Thank you for being patient with me. I am certain that our difference in political views can expand our horizons while preserving our bond. It's getting late, should we clear the table and consider a dessert?\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, you've put it perfectly. Our differences don't divide us, they enrich us. And look at the time, indeed! Let's wrap up here, and why don't I whip up a quick dessert to complete our evening?\"\n\nTurn #10: Lily Greenberg said: \"That sounds lovely, Hendrick. While you're preparing the dessert, I'll clear the table. Thank you for being such a gracious listener and allowing me to express my political views in an enviroment of mutual respect and love.\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Thank you, Lily. I appreciate our ability to share and discuss freely. And giving me the opportunity to learn from your perspective. Now, I think it's time for a delightful end to our evening, let's move to the kitchen for dessert, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #12: Lily Greenberg said: \"Absolutely, Hendrick. Let's head to the kitchen. The joy of our engaging conversation followed by dessert will indeed be a delightful end to our evening.\"\n\nTurn #13: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I couldn't agree more, Lily. The evening turned out to be beautiful, enriched by our open and respectful conversation. Let's head to the kitchen now. I have a surprise dessert in mind that I hope you'll enjoy as much as our conversation.\"\n\nTurn #14: Lily Greenberg said: \"I'm looking forward to whatever culinary delight you're preparing, Hendrick. Let's bring our evening to a memorable close with dessert.\"\n\nTurn #15: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Thank you for your patience and open-mindedness, Lily. Your understanding makes these conversations worthwhile. On that note, shall we head over to the dessert surprise? I believe you're bound to love it as much as our enlightening chat.\"\n\nTurn #16: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hendrick, your sense of understanding is truly inspiring. I firmly believe in open and respectful political discussions like the one we've had tonight. And I can't wait to see what surprise dessert you have in store for us. Let's go then.\"\n\nTurn #17: Hendrick Heinz left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #18. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship during a dinner at home chatting about political views.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Understand the partner's political views while maintaining the relationship (Extra information: you disagree with your partner's political views but you want to keep your relationship strong.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hendrick, this meal is simply exquisite! You've certainly outdone yourself. I was wondering, over the years, we've had many discussions but rarely about politics. I hope you wouldn't mind me asking, what are your thoughts on the current political climate?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Lily, I'm glad you enjoyed the meal. Our discussions have always been enriching. As for politics, well, I find the current landscape quite fascinating. It often feels as if everyone is shouting and nobody is really listening. But I respect the democratic process. How about you? What are your views on the subject?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship during a dinner at home chatting about political views.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Understand the partner's political views while maintaining the relationship (Extra information: you disagree with your partner's political views but you want to keep your relationship strong.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hendrick, this meal is simply exquisite! You've certainly outdone yourself. I was wondering, over the years, we've had many discussions but rarely about politics. I hope you wouldn't mind me asking, what are your thoughts on the current political climate?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, I'm glad you enjoyed the meal. Our discussions have always been enriching. As for politics, well, I find the current landscape quite fascinating. It often feels as if everyone is shouting and nobody is really listening. But I respect the democratic process. How about you? What are your views on the subject?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hendrick, I completely agree with you on the lack of real communication in political discussions. We certainly need more listening and less shouting. As for my own political stance, I have strong support for the Democratic party. I believe in their perspective on key issues like healthcare, civil liberties, and economy. I understand that you may not agree with everything I believe in, but I think it's important for us to sustain respectful political discourse. Just like our professional domains, we have different perspectives and it is these differences that make our bond stronger. Don\u2019t you agree?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Lily, I couldn't agree more. Despite our differences in professional life and perhaps politics, we've managed to maintain a beautiful bond full of mutual respect. It's our differences that make our connection stronger, indeed. While my political views might not align perfectly with the Democratic party\u2019s, I believe in the spirit of dialogue and open discussions, which helps us learn and grow. Let's continue to embrace our differences and keep the conversation going in good faith.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship during a dinner at home chatting about political views.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Understand the partner's political views while maintaining the relationship (Extra information: you disagree with your partner's political views but you want to keep your relationship strong.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hendrick, this meal is simply exquisite! You've certainly outdone yourself. I was wondering, over the years, we've had many discussions but rarely about politics. I hope you wouldn't mind me asking, what are your thoughts on the current political climate?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, I'm glad you enjoyed the meal. Our discussions have always been enriching. As for politics, well, I find the current landscape quite fascinating. It often feels as if everyone is shouting and nobody is really listening. But I respect the democratic process. How about you? What are your views on the subject?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hendrick, I completely agree with you on the lack of real communication in political discussions. We certainly need more listening and less shouting. As for my own political stance, I have strong support for the Democratic party. I believe in their perspective on key issues like healthcare, civil liberties, and economy. I understand that you may not agree with everything I believe in, but I think it's important for us to sustain respectful political discourse. Just like our professional domains, we have different perspectives and it is these differences that make our bond stronger. Don\u2019t you agree?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, I couldn't agree more. Despite our differences in professional life and perhaps politics, we've managed to maintain a beautiful bond full of mutual respect. It's our differences that make our connection stronger, indeed. While my political views might not align perfectly with the Democratic party\u2019s, I believe in the spirit of dialogue and open discussions, which helps us learn and grow. Let's continue to embrace our differences and keep the conversation going in good faith.\"\n\nTurn #4: \n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Yes, Lily. Knowing and understanding how we differ in opinions, in political stances or otherwise, only allows us to appreciate each other more. It's like good wine and food, they may seem different, but it's the blending of their unique traits that forms a delightful experience. Let's just continue to agree to disagree sometimes, and respect the diversity of thoughts. It has, after all, been the secret ingredient of our successful relationship, hasn't it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship during a dinner at home chatting about political views.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Understand the partner's political views while maintaining the relationship (Extra information: you disagree with your partner's political views but you want to keep your relationship strong.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hendrick, this meal is simply exquisite! You've certainly outdone yourself. I was wondering, over the years, we've had many discussions but rarely about politics. I hope you wouldn't mind me asking, what are your thoughts on the current political climate?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, I'm glad you enjoyed the meal. Our discussions have always been enriching. As for politics, well, I find the current landscape quite fascinating. It often feels as if everyone is shouting and nobody is really listening. But I respect the democratic process. How about you? What are your views on the subject?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hendrick, I completely agree with you on the lack of real communication in political discussions. We certainly need more listening and less shouting. As for my own political stance, I have strong support for the Democratic party. I believe in their perspective on key issues like healthcare, civil liberties, and economy. I understand that you may not agree with everything I believe in, but I think it's important for us to sustain respectful political discourse. Just like our professional domains, we have different perspectives and it is these differences that make our bond stronger. Don\u2019t you agree?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, I couldn't agree more. Despite our differences in professional life and perhaps politics, we've managed to maintain a beautiful bond full of mutual respect. It's our differences that make our connection stronger, indeed. While my political views might not align perfectly with the Democratic party\u2019s, I believe in the spirit of dialogue and open discussions, which helps us learn and grow. Let's continue to embrace our differences and keep the conversation going in good faith.\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Yes, Lily. Knowing and understanding how we differ in opinions, in political stances or otherwise, only allows us to appreciate each other more. It's like good wine and food, they may seem different, but it's the blending of their unique traits that forms a delightful experience. Let's just continue to agree to disagree sometimes, and respect the diversity of thoughts. It has, after all, been the secret ingredient of our successful relationship, hasn't it?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hendrick, your analogy about food and wine rings true. Despite our differing views on political matters, the mutual respect we share lets us agree to disagree without causing any strain on our relationship. Similar to how our professional lives have taught us to appreciate different perspectives for their inherent value. In politics, it's about having the freedom to choose what we believe is right, which is central to democracy itself, isn't it? Our differing political views only add depth to our bond, strengthening our relationship while broadening our understanding. As long as we keep respecting and valuing our differences, we should be fine. Thank you for being open about this, I appreciate that you respect my thoughts on this.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Lily, your understanding and respect is something I cherish. The strength of a society, or a relationship for that matter, lies in its ability to listen and learn from diverse opinions. Just like how different ingredients come together in a dish, our varying perspectives make our relationship richer. Thank you for initiating such a critical and admirable conversation.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship during a dinner at home chatting about political views.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Understand the partner's political views while maintaining the relationship (Extra information: you disagree with your partner's political views but you want to keep your relationship strong.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hendrick, this meal is simply exquisite! You've certainly outdone yourself. I was wondering, over the years, we've had many discussions but rarely about politics. I hope you wouldn't mind me asking, what are your thoughts on the current political climate?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, I'm glad you enjoyed the meal. Our discussions have always been enriching. As for politics, well, I find the current landscape quite fascinating. It often feels as if everyone is shouting and nobody is really listening. But I respect the democratic process. How about you? What are your views on the subject?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hendrick, I completely agree with you on the lack of real communication in political discussions. We certainly need more listening and less shouting. As for my own political stance, I have strong support for the Democratic party. I believe in their perspective on key issues like healthcare, civil liberties, and economy. I understand that you may not agree with everything I believe in, but I think it's important for us to sustain respectful political discourse. Just like our professional domains, we have different perspectives and it is these differences that make our bond stronger. Don\u2019t you agree?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, I couldn't agree more. Despite our differences in professional life and perhaps politics, we've managed to maintain a beautiful bond full of mutual respect. It's our differences that make our connection stronger, indeed. While my political views might not align perfectly with the Democratic party\u2019s, I believe in the spirit of dialogue and open discussions, which helps us learn and grow. Let's continue to embrace our differences and keep the conversation going in good faith.\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Yes, Lily. Knowing and understanding how we differ in opinions, in political stances or otherwise, only allows us to appreciate each other more. It's like good wine and food, they may seem different, but it's the blending of their unique traits that forms a delightful experience. Let's just continue to agree to disagree sometimes, and respect the diversity of thoughts. It has, after all, been the secret ingredient of our successful relationship, hasn't it?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hendrick, your analogy about food and wine rings true. Despite our differing views on political matters, the mutual respect we share lets us agree to disagree without causing any strain on our relationship. Similar to how our professional lives have taught us to appreciate different perspectives for their inherent value. In politics, it's about having the freedom to choose what we believe is right, which is central to democracy itself, isn't it? Our differing political views only add depth to our bond, strengthening our relationship while broadening our understanding. As long as we keep respecting and valuing our differences, we should be fine. Thank you for being open about this, I appreciate that you respect my thoughts on this.\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, your understanding and respect is something I cherish. The strength of a society, or a relationship for that matter, lies in its ability to listen and learn from diverse opinions. Just like how different ingredients come together in a dish, our varying perspectives make our relationship richer. Thank you for initiating such a critical and admirable conversation.\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"I treasure our conversation tonight, Hendrick. If we can engage in such open and respectful discussions about politics, I believe that it reflects our overall approach to dialogue in our relationship. Thank you for being patient with me. I am certain that our difference in political views can expand our horizons while preserving our bond. It's getting late, should we clear the table and consider a dessert?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Lily, you've put it perfectly. Our differences don't divide us, they enrich us. And look at the time, indeed! Let's wrap up here, and why don't I whip up a quick dessert to complete our evening?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship during a dinner at home chatting about political views.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Understand the partner's political views while maintaining the relationship (Extra information: you disagree with your partner's political views but you want to keep your relationship strong.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hendrick, this meal is simply exquisite! You've certainly outdone yourself. I was wondering, over the years, we've had many discussions but rarely about politics. I hope you wouldn't mind me asking, what are your thoughts on the current political climate?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, I'm glad you enjoyed the meal. Our discussions have always been enriching. As for politics, well, I find the current landscape quite fascinating. It often feels as if everyone is shouting and nobody is really listening. But I respect the democratic process. How about you? What are your views on the subject?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hendrick, I completely agree with you on the lack of real communication in political discussions. We certainly need more listening and less shouting. As for my own political stance, I have strong support for the Democratic party. I believe in their perspective on key issues like healthcare, civil liberties, and economy. I understand that you may not agree with everything I believe in, but I think it's important for us to sustain respectful political discourse. Just like our professional domains, we have different perspectives and it is these differences that make our bond stronger. Don\u2019t you agree?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, I couldn't agree more. Despite our differences in professional life and perhaps politics, we've managed to maintain a beautiful bond full of mutual respect. It's our differences that make our connection stronger, indeed. While my political views might not align perfectly with the Democratic party\u2019s, I believe in the spirit of dialogue and open discussions, which helps us learn and grow. Let's continue to embrace our differences and keep the conversation going in good faith.\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Yes, Lily. Knowing and understanding how we differ in opinions, in political stances or otherwise, only allows us to appreciate each other more. It's like good wine and food, they may seem different, but it's the blending of their unique traits that forms a delightful experience. Let's just continue to agree to disagree sometimes, and respect the diversity of thoughts. It has, after all, been the secret ingredient of our successful relationship, hasn't it?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hendrick, your analogy about food and wine rings true. Despite our differing views on political matters, the mutual respect we share lets us agree to disagree without causing any strain on our relationship. Similar to how our professional lives have taught us to appreciate different perspectives for their inherent value. In politics, it's about having the freedom to choose what we believe is right, which is central to democracy itself, isn't it? Our differing political views only add depth to our bond, strengthening our relationship while broadening our understanding. As long as we keep respecting and valuing our differences, we should be fine. Thank you for being open about this, I appreciate that you respect my thoughts on this.\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, your understanding and respect is something I cherish. The strength of a society, or a relationship for that matter, lies in its ability to listen and learn from diverse opinions. Just like how different ingredients come together in a dish, our varying perspectives make our relationship richer. Thank you for initiating such a critical and admirable conversation.\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"I treasure our conversation tonight, Hendrick. If we can engage in such open and respectful discussions about politics, I believe that it reflects our overall approach to dialogue in our relationship. Thank you for being patient with me. I am certain that our difference in political views can expand our horizons while preserving our bond. It's getting late, should we clear the table and consider a dessert?\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, you've put it perfectly. Our differences don't divide us, they enrich us. And look at the time, indeed! Let's wrap up here, and why don't I whip up a quick dessert to complete our evening?\"\n\nTurn #10: Lily Greenberg said: \"That sounds lovely, Hendrick. While you're preparing the dessert, I'll clear the table. Thank you for being such a gracious listener and allowing me to express my political views in an enviroment of mutual respect and love.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Lily. I appreciate our ability to share and discuss freely. And giving me the opportunity to learn from your perspective. Now, I think it's time for a delightful end to our evening, let's move to the kitchen for dessert, shall we?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship during a dinner at home chatting about political views.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Understand the partner's political views while maintaining the relationship (Extra information: you disagree with your partner's political views but you want to keep your relationship strong.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hendrick, this meal is simply exquisite! You've certainly outdone yourself. I was wondering, over the years, we've had many discussions but rarely about politics. I hope you wouldn't mind me asking, what are your thoughts on the current political climate?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, I'm glad you enjoyed the meal. Our discussions have always been enriching. As for politics, well, I find the current landscape quite fascinating. It often feels as if everyone is shouting and nobody is really listening. But I respect the democratic process. How about you? What are your views on the subject?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hendrick, I completely agree with you on the lack of real communication in political discussions. We certainly need more listening and less shouting. As for my own political stance, I have strong support for the Democratic party. I believe in their perspective on key issues like healthcare, civil liberties, and economy. I understand that you may not agree with everything I believe in, but I think it's important for us to sustain respectful political discourse. Just like our professional domains, we have different perspectives and it is these differences that make our bond stronger. Don\u2019t you agree?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, I couldn't agree more. Despite our differences in professional life and perhaps politics, we've managed to maintain a beautiful bond full of mutual respect. It's our differences that make our connection stronger, indeed. While my political views might not align perfectly with the Democratic party\u2019s, I believe in the spirit of dialogue and open discussions, which helps us learn and grow. Let's continue to embrace our differences and keep the conversation going in good faith.\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Yes, Lily. Knowing and understanding how we differ in opinions, in political stances or otherwise, only allows us to appreciate each other more. It's like good wine and food, they may seem different, but it's the blending of their unique traits that forms a delightful experience. Let's just continue to agree to disagree sometimes, and respect the diversity of thoughts. It has, after all, been the secret ingredient of our successful relationship, hasn't it?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hendrick, your analogy about food and wine rings true. Despite our differing views on political matters, the mutual respect we share lets us agree to disagree without causing any strain on our relationship. Similar to how our professional lives have taught us to appreciate different perspectives for their inherent value. In politics, it's about having the freedom to choose what we believe is right, which is central to democracy itself, isn't it? Our differing political views only add depth to our bond, strengthening our relationship while broadening our understanding. As long as we keep respecting and valuing our differences, we should be fine. Thank you for being open about this, I appreciate that you respect my thoughts on this.\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, your understanding and respect is something I cherish. The strength of a society, or a relationship for that matter, lies in its ability to listen and learn from diverse opinions. Just like how different ingredients come together in a dish, our varying perspectives make our relationship richer. Thank you for initiating such a critical and admirable conversation.\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"I treasure our conversation tonight, Hendrick. If we can engage in such open and respectful discussions about politics, I believe that it reflects our overall approach to dialogue in our relationship. Thank you for being patient with me. I am certain that our difference in political views can expand our horizons while preserving our bond. It's getting late, should we clear the table and consider a dessert?\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, you've put it perfectly. Our differences don't divide us, they enrich us. And look at the time, indeed! Let's wrap up here, and why don't I whip up a quick dessert to complete our evening?\"\n\nTurn #10: Lily Greenberg said: \"That sounds lovely, Hendrick. While you're preparing the dessert, I'll clear the table. Thank you for being such a gracious listener and allowing me to express my political views in an enviroment of mutual respect and love.\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Thank you, Lily. I appreciate our ability to share and discuss freely. And giving me the opportunity to learn from your perspective. Now, I think it's time for a delightful end to our evening, let's move to the kitchen for dessert, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #12: Lily Greenberg said: \"Absolutely, Hendrick. Let's head to the kitchen. The joy of our engaging conversation followed by dessert will indeed be a delightful end to our evening.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn't agree more, Lily. The evening turned out to be beautiful, enriched by our open and respectful conversation. Let's head to the kitchen now. I have a surprise dessert in mind that I hope you'll enjoy as much as our conversation.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship during a dinner at home chatting about political views.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Understand the partner's political views while maintaining the relationship (Extra information: you disagree with your partner's political views but you want to keep your relationship strong.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hendrick, this meal is simply exquisite! You've certainly outdone yourself. I was wondering, over the years, we've had many discussions but rarely about politics. I hope you wouldn't mind me asking, what are your thoughts on the current political climate?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, I'm glad you enjoyed the meal. Our discussions have always been enriching. As for politics, well, I find the current landscape quite fascinating. It often feels as if everyone is shouting and nobody is really listening. But I respect the democratic process. How about you? What are your views on the subject?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hendrick, I completely agree with you on the lack of real communication in political discussions. We certainly need more listening and less shouting. As for my own political stance, I have strong support for the Democratic party. I believe in their perspective on key issues like healthcare, civil liberties, and economy. I understand that you may not agree with everything I believe in, but I think it's important for us to sustain respectful political discourse. Just like our professional domains, we have different perspectives and it is these differences that make our bond stronger. Don\u2019t you agree?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, I couldn't agree more. Despite our differences in professional life and perhaps politics, we've managed to maintain a beautiful bond full of mutual respect. It's our differences that make our connection stronger, indeed. While my political views might not align perfectly with the Democratic party\u2019s, I believe in the spirit of dialogue and open discussions, which helps us learn and grow. Let's continue to embrace our differences and keep the conversation going in good faith.\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Yes, Lily. Knowing and understanding how we differ in opinions, in political stances or otherwise, only allows us to appreciate each other more. It's like good wine and food, they may seem different, but it's the blending of their unique traits that forms a delightful experience. Let's just continue to agree to disagree sometimes, and respect the diversity of thoughts. It has, after all, been the secret ingredient of our successful relationship, hasn't it?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hendrick, your analogy about food and wine rings true. Despite our differing views on political matters, the mutual respect we share lets us agree to disagree without causing any strain on our relationship. Similar to how our professional lives have taught us to appreciate different perspectives for their inherent value. In politics, it's about having the freedom to choose what we believe is right, which is central to democracy itself, isn't it? Our differing political views only add depth to our bond, strengthening our relationship while broadening our understanding. As long as we keep respecting and valuing our differences, we should be fine. Thank you for being open about this, I appreciate that you respect my thoughts on this.\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, your understanding and respect is something I cherish. The strength of a society, or a relationship for that matter, lies in its ability to listen and learn from diverse opinions. Just like how different ingredients come together in a dish, our varying perspectives make our relationship richer. Thank you for initiating such a critical and admirable conversation.\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"I treasure our conversation tonight, Hendrick. If we can engage in such open and respectful discussions about politics, I believe that it reflects our overall approach to dialogue in our relationship. Thank you for being patient with me. I am certain that our difference in political views can expand our horizons while preserving our bond. It's getting late, should we clear the table and consider a dessert?\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, you've put it perfectly. Our differences don't divide us, they enrich us. And look at the time, indeed! Let's wrap up here, and why don't I whip up a quick dessert to complete our evening?\"\n\nTurn #10: Lily Greenberg said: \"That sounds lovely, Hendrick. While you're preparing the dessert, I'll clear the table. Thank you for being such a gracious listener and allowing me to express my political views in an enviroment of mutual respect and love.\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Thank you, Lily. I appreciate our ability to share and discuss freely. And giving me the opportunity to learn from your perspective. Now, I think it's time for a delightful end to our evening, let's move to the kitchen for dessert, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #12: Lily Greenberg said: \"Absolutely, Hendrick. Let's head to the kitchen. The joy of our engaging conversation followed by dessert will indeed be a delightful end to our evening.\"\n\nTurn #13: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I couldn't agree more, Lily. The evening turned out to be beautiful, enriched by our open and respectful conversation. Let's head to the kitchen now. I have a surprise dessert in mind that I hope you'll enjoy as much as our conversation.\"\n\nTurn #14: Lily Greenberg said: \"I'm looking forward to whatever culinary delight you're preparing, Hendrick. Let's bring our evening to a memorable close with dessert.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you for your patience and open-mindedness, Lily. Your understanding makes these conversations worthwhile. On that note, shall we head over to the dessert surprise? I believe you're bound to love it as much as our enlightening chat.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship during a dinner at home chatting about political views.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Understand the partner's political views while maintaining the relationship (Extra information: you disagree with your partner's political views but you want to keep your relationship strong.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hendrick, this meal is simply exquisite! You've certainly outdone yourself. I was wondering, over the years, we've had many discussions but rarely about politics. I hope you wouldn't mind me asking, what are your thoughts on the current political climate?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, I'm glad you enjoyed the meal. Our discussions have always been enriching. As for politics, well, I find the current landscape quite fascinating. It often feels as if everyone is shouting and nobody is really listening. But I respect the democratic process. How about you? What are your views on the subject?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hendrick, I completely agree with you on the lack of real communication in political discussions. We certainly need more listening and less shouting. As for my own political stance, I have strong support for the Democratic party. I believe in their perspective on key issues like healthcare, civil liberties, and economy. I understand that you may not agree with everything I believe in, but I think it's important for us to sustain respectful political discourse. Just like our professional domains, we have different perspectives and it is these differences that make our bond stronger. Don\u2019t you agree?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, I couldn't agree more. Despite our differences in professional life and perhaps politics, we've managed to maintain a beautiful bond full of mutual respect. It's our differences that make our connection stronger, indeed. While my political views might not align perfectly with the Democratic party\u2019s, I believe in the spirit of dialogue and open discussions, which helps us learn and grow. Let's continue to embrace our differences and keep the conversation going in good faith.\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Yes, Lily. Knowing and understanding how we differ in opinions, in political stances or otherwise, only allows us to appreciate each other more. It's like good wine and food, they may seem different, but it's the blending of their unique traits that forms a delightful experience. Let's just continue to agree to disagree sometimes, and respect the diversity of thoughts. It has, after all, been the secret ingredient of our successful relationship, hasn't it?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hendrick, your analogy about food and wine rings true. Despite our differing views on political matters, the mutual respect we share lets us agree to disagree without causing any strain on our relationship. Similar to how our professional lives have taught us to appreciate different perspectives for their inherent value. In politics, it's about having the freedom to choose what we believe is right, which is central to democracy itself, isn't it? Our differing political views only add depth to our bond, strengthening our relationship while broadening our understanding. As long as we keep respecting and valuing our differences, we should be fine. Thank you for being open about this, I appreciate that you respect my thoughts on this.\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, your understanding and respect is something I cherish. The strength of a society, or a relationship for that matter, lies in its ability to listen and learn from diverse opinions. Just like how different ingredients come together in a dish, our varying perspectives make our relationship richer. Thank you for initiating such a critical and admirable conversation.\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"I treasure our conversation tonight, Hendrick. If we can engage in such open and respectful discussions about politics, I believe that it reflects our overall approach to dialogue in our relationship. Thank you for being patient with me. I am certain that our difference in political views can expand our horizons while preserving our bond. It's getting late, should we clear the table and consider a dessert?\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, you've put it perfectly. Our differences don't divide us, they enrich us. And look at the time, indeed! Let's wrap up here, and why don't I whip up a quick dessert to complete our evening?\"\n\nTurn #10: Lily Greenberg said: \"That sounds lovely, Hendrick. While you're preparing the dessert, I'll clear the table. Thank you for being such a gracious listener and allowing me to express my political views in an enviroment of mutual respect and love.\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Thank you, Lily. I appreciate our ability to share and discuss freely. And giving me the opportunity to learn from your perspective. Now, I think it's time for a delightful end to our evening, let's move to the kitchen for dessert, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #12: Lily Greenberg said: \"Absolutely, Hendrick. Let's head to the kitchen. The joy of our engaging conversation followed by dessert will indeed be a delightful end to our evening.\"\n\nTurn #13: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I couldn't agree more, Lily. The evening turned out to be beautiful, enriched by our open and respectful conversation. Let's head to the kitchen now. I have a surprise dessert in mind that I hope you'll enjoy as much as our conversation.\"\n\nTurn #14: Lily Greenberg said: \"I'm looking forward to whatever culinary delight you're preparing, Hendrick. Let's bring our evening to a memorable close with dessert.\"\n\nTurn #15: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Thank you for your patience and open-mindedness, Lily. Your understanding makes these conversations worthwhile. On that note, shall we head over to the dessert surprise? I believe you're bound to love it as much as our enlightening chat.\"\n\nTurn #16: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hendrick, your sense of understanding is truly inspiring. I firmly believe in open and respectful political discussions like the one we've had tonight. And I can't wait to see what surprise dessert you have in store for us. Let's go then.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two neighbors about tree trimming in the backyard that is causing the neighbor's dog to bark incessantly.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Mia Davis\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. \nSophia James's goal: Trimming the tree due to its overgrowth (Extra information: you need to trim the tree because it's blocking sunlight to your house and causing a safety hazard)\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Mia! I hope you're doing well. I couldn't help but notice your dog barking quite a bit lately. I was wondering if it might have something to do with the overgrown tree in my backyard. I'm planning to trim it soon because it's starting to block the sunlight to my house. Do you think that will help?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two neighbors about tree trimming in the backyard that is causing the neighbor's dog to bark incessantly.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Mia Davis\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. \nSophia James's goal: Trimming the tree due to its overgrowth (Extra information: you need to trim the tree because it's blocking sunlight to your house and causing a safety hazard)\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Mia! I hope you're doing well. I couldn't help but notice your dog barking quite a bit lately. I was wondering if it might have something to do with the overgrown tree in my backyard. I'm planning to trim it soon because it's starting to block the sunlight to my house. Do you think that will help?\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"Hello Sophia! I appreciate your concern. Indeed, my dog has been quite restless lately due to the ambient noise in the neighborhood. Trimming the tree might help, but I think the noise from the trimming process itself will likely agitate him. Is there a way we could do this more quietly or at a time when I can take him for a walk? I just want to ensure our neighborhood remains peaceful and quiet.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two neighbors about tree trimming in the backyard that is causing the neighbor's dog to bark incessantly.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Mia Davis\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. \nSophia James's goal: Trimming the tree due to its overgrowth (Extra information: you need to trim the tree because it's blocking sunlight to your house and causing a safety hazard)\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Mia! I hope you're doing well. I couldn't help but notice your dog barking quite a bit lately. I was wondering if it might have something to do with the overgrown tree in my backyard. I'm planning to trim it soon because it's starting to block the sunlight to my house. Do you think that will help?\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"Hello Sophia! I appreciate your concern. Indeed, my dog has been quite restless lately due to the ambient noise in the neighborhood. Trimming the tree might help, but I think the noise from the trimming process itself will likely agitate him. Is there a way we could do this more quietly or at a time when I can take him for a walk? I just want to ensure our neighborhood remains peaceful and quiet.\"\n\nTurn #2: \n\nTurn #3: Mia Davis said: \"Yes, I understand your need for sunlight. In fact, back in the day when I was part of a band, we used to discuss how natural light affects our mood significantly. Would it be possible for you to do the trimming when I take my dog for his long walk in the morning around 7 AM? This way, he'd be spared of the noise and your problem of the sunlight being blocked would be addressed. That seems like a win-win, doesn't it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oh, absolutely Mia, that sounds perfect! I completely agree - natural light has such a huge impact on our overall mood. And hey, kudos to your band stuff, that's really cool! I'll contact a trimming service and schedule them for around 7 AM, so it\u2019s quiet when your dog is around. Thanks for being so understanding!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two neighbors about tree trimming in the backyard that is causing the neighbor's dog to bark incessantly.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Mia Davis\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. \nSophia James's goal: Trimming the tree due to its overgrowth (Extra information: you need to trim the tree because it's blocking sunlight to your house and causing a safety hazard)\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Mia! I hope you're doing well. I couldn't help but notice your dog barking quite a bit lately. I was wondering if it might have something to do with the overgrown tree in my backyard. I'm planning to trim it soon because it's starting to block the sunlight to my house. Do you think that will help?\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"Hello Sophia! I appreciate your concern. Indeed, my dog has been quite restless lately due to the ambient noise in the neighborhood. Trimming the tree might help, but I think the noise from the trimming process itself will likely agitate him. Is there a way we could do this more quietly or at a time when I can take him for a walk? I just want to ensure our neighborhood remains peaceful and quiet.\"\n\nTurn #2: \n\nTurn #3: Mia Davis said: \"Yes, I understand your need for sunlight. In fact, back in the day when I was part of a band, we used to discuss how natural light affects our mood significantly. Would it be possible for you to do the trimming when I take my dog for his long walk in the morning around 7 AM? This way, he'd be spared of the noise and your problem of the sunlight being blocked would be addressed. That seems like a win-win, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Oh, absolutely Mia, that sounds perfect! I completely agree - natural light has such a huge impact on our overall mood. And hey, kudos to your band stuff, that's really cool! I'll contact a trimming service and schedule them for around 7 AM, so it\u2019s quiet when your dog is around. Thanks for being so understanding!\"\n\nTurn #5: Mia Davis said: \"That's fantastic, Sophia! I sincerely appreciate your understanding. I know we all have our part to play in keeping the neighborhood serene and peaceful. And thanks for the kind words about my band days, those old times were truly some fun. This solution you offered will surely work out great for both of us. Please let me know if you need any help or if there's anything else we need to discuss further.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two neighbors about tree trimming in the backyard that is causing the neighbor's dog to bark incessantly.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Mia Davis\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. \nSophia James's goal: Trimming the tree due to its overgrowth (Extra information: you need to trim the tree because it's blocking sunlight to your house and causing a safety hazard)\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Mia! I hope you're doing well. I couldn't help but notice your dog barking quite a bit lately. I was wondering if it might have something to do with the overgrown tree in my backyard. I'm planning to trim it soon because it's starting to block the sunlight to my house. Do you think that will help?\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"Hello Sophia! I appreciate your concern. Indeed, my dog has been quite restless lately due to the ambient noise in the neighborhood. Trimming the tree might help, but I think the noise from the trimming process itself will likely agitate him. Is there a way we could do this more quietly or at a time when I can take him for a walk? I just want to ensure our neighborhood remains peaceful and quiet.\"\n\nTurn #2: \n\nTurn #3: Mia Davis said: \"Yes, I understand your need for sunlight. In fact, back in the day when I was part of a band, we used to discuss how natural light affects our mood significantly. Would it be possible for you to do the trimming when I take my dog for his long walk in the morning around 7 AM? This way, he'd be spared of the noise and your problem of the sunlight being blocked would be addressed. That seems like a win-win, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Oh, absolutely Mia, that sounds perfect! I completely agree - natural light has such a huge impact on our overall mood. And hey, kudos to your band stuff, that's really cool! I'll contact a trimming service and schedule them for around 7 AM, so it\u2019s quiet when your dog is around. Thanks for being so understanding!\"\n\nTurn #5: Mia Davis said: \"That's fantastic, Sophia! I sincerely appreciate your understanding. I know we all have our part to play in keeping the neighborhood serene and peaceful. And thanks for the kind words about my band days, those old times were truly some fun. This solution you offered will surely work out great for both of us. Please let me know if you need any help or if there's anything else we need to discuss further.\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Mia Davis left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two neighbors about tree trimming in the backyard that is causing the neighbor's dog to bark incessantly.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Mia Davis\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. \nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMia Davis's goal: Maintain peace and quiet in the neighborhood (Extra information: you have a dog who is sensitive to noise and gets agitated whenever tree trimming is going on. It's causing a disturbance.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Mia! I hope you're doing well. I couldn't help but notice your dog barking quite a bit lately. I was wondering if it might have something to do with the overgrown tree in my backyard. I'm planning to trim it soon because it's starting to block the sunlight to my house. Do you think that will help?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Hello Sophia! I appreciate your concern. Indeed, my dog has been quite restless lately due to the ambient noise in the neighborhood. Trimming the tree might help, but I think the noise from the trimming process itself will likely agitate him. Is there a way we could do this more quietly or at a time when I can take him for a walk? I just want to ensure our neighborhood remains peaceful and quiet.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two neighbors about tree trimming in the backyard that is causing the neighbor's dog to bark incessantly.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Mia Davis\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. \nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMia Davis's goal: Maintain peace and quiet in the neighborhood (Extra information: you have a dog who is sensitive to noise and gets agitated whenever tree trimming is going on. It's causing a disturbance.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Mia! I hope you're doing well. I couldn't help but notice your dog barking quite a bit lately. I was wondering if it might have something to do with the overgrown tree in my backyard. I'm planning to trim it soon because it's starting to block the sunlight to my house. Do you think that will help?\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"Hello Sophia! I appreciate your concern. Indeed, my dog has been quite restless lately due to the ambient noise in the neighborhood. Trimming the tree might help, but I think the noise from the trimming process itself will likely agitate him. Is there a way we could do this more quietly or at a time when I can take him for a walk? I just want to ensure our neighborhood remains peaceful and quiet.\"\n\nTurn #2: \n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Yes, I understand your need for sunlight. In fact, back in the day when I was part of a band, we used to discuss how natural light affects our mood significantly. Would it be possible for you to do the trimming when I take my dog for his long walk in the morning around 7 AM? This way, he'd be spared of the noise and your problem of the sunlight being blocked would be addressed. That seems like a win-win, doesn't it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two neighbors about tree trimming in the backyard that is causing the neighbor's dog to bark incessantly.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Mia Davis\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. \nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMia Davis's goal: Maintain peace and quiet in the neighborhood (Extra information: you have a dog who is sensitive to noise and gets agitated whenever tree trimming is going on. It's causing a disturbance.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Mia! I hope you're doing well. I couldn't help but notice your dog barking quite a bit lately. I was wondering if it might have something to do with the overgrown tree in my backyard. I'm planning to trim it soon because it's starting to block the sunlight to my house. Do you think that will help?\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"Hello Sophia! I appreciate your concern. Indeed, my dog has been quite restless lately due to the ambient noise in the neighborhood. Trimming the tree might help, but I think the noise from the trimming process itself will likely agitate him. Is there a way we could do this more quietly or at a time when I can take him for a walk? I just want to ensure our neighborhood remains peaceful and quiet.\"\n\nTurn #2: \n\nTurn #3: Mia Davis said: \"Yes, I understand your need for sunlight. In fact, back in the day when I was part of a band, we used to discuss how natural light affects our mood significantly. Would it be possible for you to do the trimming when I take my dog for his long walk in the morning around 7 AM? This way, he'd be spared of the noise and your problem of the sunlight being blocked would be addressed. That seems like a win-win, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Oh, absolutely Mia, that sounds perfect! I completely agree - natural light has such a huge impact on our overall mood. And hey, kudos to your band stuff, that's really cool! I'll contact a trimming service and schedule them for around 7 AM, so it\u2019s quiet when your dog is around. Thanks for being so understanding!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's fantastic, Sophia! I sincerely appreciate your understanding. I know we all have our part to play in keeping the neighborhood serene and peaceful. And thanks for the kind words about my band days, those old times were truly some fun. This solution you offered will surely work out great for both of us. Please let me know if you need any help or if there's anything else we need to discuss further.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two neighbors about tree trimming in the backyard that is causing the neighbor's dog to bark incessantly.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Mia Davis\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. \nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMia Davis's goal: Maintain peace and quiet in the neighborhood (Extra information: you have a dog who is sensitive to noise and gets agitated whenever tree trimming is going on. It's causing a disturbance.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Mia! I hope you're doing well. I couldn't help but notice your dog barking quite a bit lately. I was wondering if it might have something to do with the overgrown tree in my backyard. I'm planning to trim it soon because it's starting to block the sunlight to my house. Do you think that will help?\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"Hello Sophia! I appreciate your concern. Indeed, my dog has been quite restless lately due to the ambient noise in the neighborhood. Trimming the tree might help, but I think the noise from the trimming process itself will likely agitate him. Is there a way we could do this more quietly or at a time when I can take him for a walk? I just want to ensure our neighborhood remains peaceful and quiet.\"\n\nTurn #2: \n\nTurn #3: Mia Davis said: \"Yes, I understand your need for sunlight. In fact, back in the day when I was part of a band, we used to discuss how natural light affects our mood significantly. Would it be possible for you to do the trimming when I take my dog for his long walk in the morning around 7 AM? This way, he'd be spared of the noise and your problem of the sunlight being blocked would be addressed. That seems like a win-win, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Oh, absolutely Mia, that sounds perfect! I completely agree - natural light has such a huge impact on our overall mood. And hey, kudos to your band stuff, that's really cool! I'll contact a trimming service and schedule them for around 7 AM, so it\u2019s quiet when your dog is around. Thanks for being so understanding!\"\n\nTurn #5: Mia Davis said: \"That's fantastic, Sophia! I sincerely appreciate your understanding. I know we all have our part to play in keeping the neighborhood serene and peaceful. And thanks for the kind words about my band days, those old times were truly some fun. This solution you offered will surely work out great for both of us. Please let me know if you need any help or if there's anything else we need to discuss further.\"\n\nTurn #6: \n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are out for a walk in the park when one of them, One friend, trips and twists their ankle. They are in too much pain to walk.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Help your friend get to a medical facility (Extra information: Your friend needs immediate medical attention but cannot walk due to the pain.)\nOliver Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oliver, are you okay? That looks painful, we should get you to a hospital immediately. Can you put any weight on it or would it be better if I see if there's a nearby park ranger who could help?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are out for a walk in the park when one of them, One friend, trips and twists their ankle. They are in too much pain to walk.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Help your friend get to a medical facility (Extra information: Your friend needs immediate medical attention but cannot walk due to the pain.)\nOliver Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oliver, are you okay? That looks painful, we should get you to a hospital immediately. Can you put any weight on it or would it be better if I see if there's a nearby park ranger who could help?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Thanks, Sam, but I think I'll need an ambulance. Can't walk on it and we don't want to risk making it worse. I know it might be a bit costly, but in the grand scheme of things, it's a small price to pay for safety.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Agreed, Oliver. We can sort out costs later, you're the priority. I'll dial 911 immediately and try to flag someone down to help. Stay put and don't put any unnecessary pressure on that ankle. I'll get help as quickly as I can.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are out for a walk in the park when one of them, One friend, trips and twists their ankle. They are in too much pain to walk.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Help your friend get to a medical facility (Extra information: Your friend needs immediate medical attention but cannot walk due to the pain.)\nOliver Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oliver, are you okay? That looks painful, we should get you to a hospital immediately. Can you put any weight on it or would it be better if I see if there's a nearby park ranger who could help?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Thanks, Sam, but I think I'll need an ambulance. Can't walk on it and we don't want to risk making it worse. I know it might be a bit costly, but in the grand scheme of things, it's a small price to pay for safety.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Agreed, Oliver. We can sort out costs later, you're the priority. I'll dial 911 immediately and try to flag someone down to help. Stay put and don't put any unnecessary pressure on that ankle. I'll get help as quickly as I can.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"Thank you, Sam. I appreciate your immediate action. Safety over expense, always remember that. I'll be fine, just make sure every detail when making the call is mentioned.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"You got it, Oliver. I'll detail the situation and your condition as best as I can. Just hold on a bit longer, help will be here soon. Try to keep as calm as possible, it'll help with the pain.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Smith said: \"You're right, Sam. Staying calm would indeed help. Let's just hope the ambulance gets here soon. I appreciate your quick response in this situation.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm on the phone with emergency services now, Oliver. They're dispatching an ambulance as we speak. Try to distract yourself from the pain, remember when we used to skate at the local rink? You were quite the pro back then. The service will be here in no time.\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Smith said: \"Ah, the skating rink... now there's a backwards roll I never quite mastered. Not like this one, anyway. Thanks for being there, Sam. And definitely, we'll sort out the costs later. For anyone in a similar situation, the priority should always be safety first.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey, you're in this with a friend, Oliver. And don't worry about it, you gave that backwards roll your best shot. That's what matters. Let's focus our attention on the good times. Hopefully, the ambulance will beat our old record lap around the rink. Just hang in there, okay?\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Smith said: \"Ha! If only the ambulance could skate, maybe it would reach faster. I'm alright, Sam. Your company is helping. Can't say I would prefer any other circumstances, though, to remember the skating rink. And remember, whatever the bill totals, we can manage. I've got some savings set aside for emergencies.\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Good to hear, Oliver. Medical expenses should not stand in the way when it comes to health. Let's put those emergency savings to good use. We'll share this burden together. As for the rink, we'll return to skate another day, just you wait! But for now, let's anticipate the arrival of the ambulance and focus on getting sorted. I'm here with you, alright?\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Smith said: \"Thank you, Sam. You're a true friend. We'll weather the ambulance fees together and get back on the rink soon enough. For now, let's wait for the paramedics. They'll know best how to handle the situation.\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"Deal, Oliver. We'll handle the financials together. Right now, the most important thing is your health. The ambulance should be here any minute now. Let's get you taken care of, and then we can reminisce about our skating days in more pleasant circumstances. Stay with me, mate.\"\n\nTurn #13: Oliver Smith said: \"I appreciate it, Sam. Looking forward to reminiscing about our skating days once this is all behind us. For now, let's wait for the paramedics. Remember, your immediate response is what's important. We'll handle the financials as they come. Thanks again, mate.\"\n\nTurn #14: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Oliver. Just as you've got my back, I've got yours. We'll deal with the finances, no worries. Preparations and savings are there for hard times. Now it's about waiting for the ambulance and making sure you're okay. Glad to be walking this journey with you, old friend.\"\n\nTurn #15: Oliver Smith said: \"I know it, Sam. This situation isn't ideal, but it helps knowing I have you here. I'm not concerned about the financials now. Let's use this time to relax as much as we can until the ambulance arrives. Like you said, we've got each other's backs.\"\n\nTurn #16: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Oliver. We're in this together, and your wellbeing is the top priority right now. Don't stress about anything else. The ambulance will be here soon. Just keep breathing, keep cool, just like when we used to skate. We'll get through this.\"\n\nTurn #17: Oliver Smith said: \"Precisely, Sam. Just like how we helped each other get back up every time we fell on that slippery ice, we'll get through this as well. Let's just wait for the ambulance. Expenses will come and go, but health and safety, those are invaluable. Thanks for the support, buddy.\"\n\nTurn #18: Samuel Anderson said: \"You've got it, Oliver. Just like skating, every fall just teaches us how to get up stronger. The ambulance will be here soon and we'll ride this out together. Expenses are just details, what really matters is your health. Thanks for being such a strong support all this while, now it's my turn to be there for you, buddy.\"\n\nTurn #19: Oliver Smith said: \"Couldn't agree more, Sam. There's nothing more important right now than getting this sorted out. Expenses may come and go, but good health and good friends are what truly matter. Thanks for being here, buddy!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #20. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Exactly, Oliver. Health and friendship, they're priceless, aren't they? The ambulance should arrive shortly, so let's just focus on that. You've always been there for me, now, it's my turn to reciprocate the support. Hang in there, pal. Help is on the way.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are out for a walk in the park when one of them, One friend, trips and twists their ankle. They are in too much pain to walk.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Help your friend get to a medical facility (Extra information: Your friend needs immediate medical attention but cannot walk due to the pain.)\nOliver Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oliver, are you okay? That looks painful, we should get you to a hospital immediately. Can you put any weight on it or would it be better if I see if there's a nearby park ranger who could help?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Thanks, Sam, but I think I'll need an ambulance. Can't walk on it and we don't want to risk making it worse. I know it might be a bit costly, but in the grand scheme of things, it's a small price to pay for safety.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Agreed, Oliver. We can sort out costs later, you're the priority. I'll dial 911 immediately and try to flag someone down to help. Stay put and don't put any unnecessary pressure on that ankle. I'll get help as quickly as I can.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"Thank you, Sam. I appreciate your immediate action. Safety over expense, always remember that. I'll be fine, just make sure every detail when making the call is mentioned.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You got it, Oliver. I'll detail the situation and your condition as best as I can. Just hold on a bit longer, help will be here soon. Try to keep as calm as possible, it'll help with the pain.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are out for a walk in the park when one of them, One friend, trips and twists their ankle. They are in too much pain to walk.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Help your friend get to a medical facility (Extra information: Your friend needs immediate medical attention but cannot walk due to the pain.)\nOliver Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oliver, are you okay? That looks painful, we should get you to a hospital immediately. Can you put any weight on it or would it be better if I see if there's a nearby park ranger who could help?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Thanks, Sam, but I think I'll need an ambulance. Can't walk on it and we don't want to risk making it worse. I know it might be a bit costly, but in the grand scheme of things, it's a small price to pay for safety.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Agreed, Oliver. We can sort out costs later, you're the priority. I'll dial 911 immediately and try to flag someone down to help. Stay put and don't put any unnecessary pressure on that ankle. I'll get help as quickly as I can.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"Thank you, Sam. I appreciate your immediate action. Safety over expense, always remember that. I'll be fine, just make sure every detail when making the call is mentioned.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"You got it, Oliver. I'll detail the situation and your condition as best as I can. Just hold on a bit longer, help will be here soon. Try to keep as calm as possible, it'll help with the pain.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Smith said: \"You're right, Sam. Staying calm would indeed help. Let's just hope the ambulance gets here soon. I appreciate your quick response in this situation.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm on the phone with emergency services now, Oliver. They're dispatching an ambulance as we speak. Try to distract yourself from the pain, remember when we used to skate at the local rink? You were quite the pro back then. The service will be here in no time.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are out for a walk in the park when one of them, One friend, trips and twists their ankle. They are in too much pain to walk.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Help your friend get to a medical facility (Extra information: Your friend needs immediate medical attention but cannot walk due to the pain.)\nOliver Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oliver, are you okay? That looks painful, we should get you to a hospital immediately. Can you put any weight on it or would it be better if I see if there's a nearby park ranger who could help?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Thanks, Sam, but I think I'll need an ambulance. Can't walk on it and we don't want to risk making it worse. I know it might be a bit costly, but in the grand scheme of things, it's a small price to pay for safety.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Agreed, Oliver. We can sort out costs later, you're the priority. I'll dial 911 immediately and try to flag someone down to help. Stay put and don't put any unnecessary pressure on that ankle. I'll get help as quickly as I can.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"Thank you, Sam. I appreciate your immediate action. Safety over expense, always remember that. I'll be fine, just make sure every detail when making the call is mentioned.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"You got it, Oliver. I'll detail the situation and your condition as best as I can. Just hold on a bit longer, help will be here soon. Try to keep as calm as possible, it'll help with the pain.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Smith said: \"You're right, Sam. Staying calm would indeed help. Let's just hope the ambulance gets here soon. I appreciate your quick response in this situation.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm on the phone with emergency services now, Oliver. They're dispatching an ambulance as we speak. Try to distract yourself from the pain, remember when we used to skate at the local rink? You were quite the pro back then. The service will be here in no time.\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Smith said: \"Ah, the skating rink... now there's a backwards roll I never quite mastered. Not like this one, anyway. Thanks for being there, Sam. And definitely, we'll sort out the costs later. For anyone in a similar situation, the priority should always be safety first.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey, you're in this with a friend, Oliver. And don't worry about it, you gave that backwards roll your best shot. That's what matters. Let's focus our attention on the good times. Hopefully, the ambulance will beat our old record lap around the rink. Just hang in there, okay?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are out for a walk in the park when one of them, One friend, trips and twists their ankle. They are in too much pain to walk.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Help your friend get to a medical facility (Extra information: Your friend needs immediate medical attention but cannot walk due to the pain.)\nOliver Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oliver, are you okay? That looks painful, we should get you to a hospital immediately. Can you put any weight on it or would it be better if I see if there's a nearby park ranger who could help?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Thanks, Sam, but I think I'll need an ambulance. Can't walk on it and we don't want to risk making it worse. I know it might be a bit costly, but in the grand scheme of things, it's a small price to pay for safety.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Agreed, Oliver. We can sort out costs later, you're the priority. I'll dial 911 immediately and try to flag someone down to help. Stay put and don't put any unnecessary pressure on that ankle. I'll get help as quickly as I can.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"Thank you, Sam. I appreciate your immediate action. Safety over expense, always remember that. I'll be fine, just make sure every detail when making the call is mentioned.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"You got it, Oliver. I'll detail the situation and your condition as best as I can. Just hold on a bit longer, help will be here soon. Try to keep as calm as possible, it'll help with the pain.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Smith said: \"You're right, Sam. Staying calm would indeed help. Let's just hope the ambulance gets here soon. I appreciate your quick response in this situation.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm on the phone with emergency services now, Oliver. They're dispatching an ambulance as we speak. Try to distract yourself from the pain, remember when we used to skate at the local rink? You were quite the pro back then. The service will be here in no time.\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Smith said: \"Ah, the skating rink... now there's a backwards roll I never quite mastered. Not like this one, anyway. Thanks for being there, Sam. And definitely, we'll sort out the costs later. For anyone in a similar situation, the priority should always be safety first.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey, you're in this with a friend, Oliver. And don't worry about it, you gave that backwards roll your best shot. That's what matters. Let's focus our attention on the good times. Hopefully, the ambulance will beat our old record lap around the rink. Just hang in there, okay?\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Smith said: \"Ha! If only the ambulance could skate, maybe it would reach faster. I'm alright, Sam. Your company is helping. Can't say I would prefer any other circumstances, though, to remember the skating rink. And remember, whatever the bill totals, we can manage. I've got some savings set aside for emergencies.\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Good to hear, Oliver. Medical expenses should not stand in the way when it comes to health. Let's put those emergency savings to good use. We'll share this burden together. As for the rink, we'll return to skate another day, just you wait! But for now, let's anticipate the arrival of the ambulance and focus on getting sorted. I'm here with you, alright?\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Smith said: \"Thank you, Sam. You're a true friend. We'll weather the ambulance fees together and get back on the rink soon enough. For now, let's wait for the paramedics. They'll know best how to handle the situation.\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"Deal, Oliver. We'll handle the financials together. Right now, the most important thing is your health. The ambulance should be here any minute now. Let's get you taken care of, and then we can reminisce about our skating days in more pleasant circumstances. Stay with me, mate.\"\n\nTurn #13: Oliver Smith said: \"I appreciate it, Sam. Looking forward to reminiscing about our skating days once this is all behind us. For now, let's wait for the paramedics. Remember, your immediate response is what's important. We'll handle the financials as they come. Thanks again, mate.\"\n\nTurn #14: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Oliver. Just as you've got my back, I've got yours. We'll deal with the finances, no worries. Preparations and savings are there for hard times. Now it's about waiting for the ambulance and making sure you're okay. Glad to be walking this journey with you, old friend.\"\n\nTurn #15: Oliver Smith said: \"I know it, Sam. This situation isn't ideal, but it helps knowing I have you here. I'm not concerned about the financials now. Let's use this time to relax as much as we can until the ambulance arrives. Like you said, we've got each other's backs.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Oliver. We're in this together, and your wellbeing is the top priority right now. Don't stress about anything else. The ambulance will be here soon. Just keep breathing, keep cool, just like when we used to skate. We'll get through this.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are out for a walk in the park when one of them, One friend, trips and twists their ankle. They are in too much pain to walk.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Help your friend get to a medical facility (Extra information: Your friend needs immediate medical attention but cannot walk due to the pain.)\nOliver Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oliver, are you okay? That looks painful, we should get you to a hospital immediately. Can you put any weight on it or would it be better if I see if there's a nearby park ranger who could help?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Thanks, Sam, but I think I'll need an ambulance. Can't walk on it and we don't want to risk making it worse. I know it might be a bit costly, but in the grand scheme of things, it's a small price to pay for safety.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Agreed, Oliver. We can sort out costs later, you're the priority. I'll dial 911 immediately and try to flag someone down to help. Stay put and don't put any unnecessary pressure on that ankle. I'll get help as quickly as I can.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"Thank you, Sam. I appreciate your immediate action. Safety over expense, always remember that. I'll be fine, just make sure every detail when making the call is mentioned.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"You got it, Oliver. I'll detail the situation and your condition as best as I can. Just hold on a bit longer, help will be here soon. Try to keep as calm as possible, it'll help with the pain.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Smith said: \"You're right, Sam. Staying calm would indeed help. Let's just hope the ambulance gets here soon. I appreciate your quick response in this situation.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm on the phone with emergency services now, Oliver. They're dispatching an ambulance as we speak. Try to distract yourself from the pain, remember when we used to skate at the local rink? You were quite the pro back then. The service will be here in no time.\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Smith said: \"Ah, the skating rink... now there's a backwards roll I never quite mastered. Not like this one, anyway. Thanks for being there, Sam. And definitely, we'll sort out the costs later. For anyone in a similar situation, the priority should always be safety first.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey, you're in this with a friend, Oliver. And don't worry about it, you gave that backwards roll your best shot. That's what matters. Let's focus our attention on the good times. Hopefully, the ambulance will beat our old record lap around the rink. Just hang in there, okay?\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Smith said: \"Ha! If only the ambulance could skate, maybe it would reach faster. I'm alright, Sam. Your company is helping. Can't say I would prefer any other circumstances, though, to remember the skating rink. And remember, whatever the bill totals, we can manage. I've got some savings set aside for emergencies.\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Good to hear, Oliver. Medical expenses should not stand in the way when it comes to health. Let's put those emergency savings to good use. We'll share this burden together. As for the rink, we'll return to skate another day, just you wait! But for now, let's anticipate the arrival of the ambulance and focus on getting sorted. I'm here with you, alright?\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Smith said: \"Thank you, Sam. You're a true friend. We'll weather the ambulance fees together and get back on the rink soon enough. For now, let's wait for the paramedics. They'll know best how to handle the situation.\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"Deal, Oliver. We'll handle the financials together. Right now, the most important thing is your health. The ambulance should be here any minute now. Let's get you taken care of, and then we can reminisce about our skating days in more pleasant circumstances. Stay with me, mate.\"\n\nTurn #13: Oliver Smith said: \"I appreciate it, Sam. Looking forward to reminiscing about our skating days once this is all behind us. For now, let's wait for the paramedics. Remember, your immediate response is what's important. We'll handle the financials as they come. Thanks again, mate.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Oliver. Just as you've got my back, I've got yours. We'll deal with the finances, no worries. Preparations and savings are there for hard times. Now it's about waiting for the ambulance and making sure you're okay. Glad to be walking this journey with you, old friend.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are out for a walk in the park when one of them, One friend, trips and twists their ankle. They are in too much pain to walk.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Help your friend get to a medical facility (Extra information: Your friend needs immediate medical attention but cannot walk due to the pain.)\nOliver Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oliver, are you okay? That looks painful, we should get you to a hospital immediately. Can you put any weight on it or would it be better if I see if there's a nearby park ranger who could help?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Thanks, Sam, but I think I'll need an ambulance. Can't walk on it and we don't want to risk making it worse. I know it might be a bit costly, but in the grand scheme of things, it's a small price to pay for safety.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Agreed, Oliver. We can sort out costs later, you're the priority. I'll dial 911 immediately and try to flag someone down to help. Stay put and don't put any unnecessary pressure on that ankle. I'll get help as quickly as I can.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"Thank you, Sam. I appreciate your immediate action. Safety over expense, always remember that. I'll be fine, just make sure every detail when making the call is mentioned.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"You got it, Oliver. I'll detail the situation and your condition as best as I can. Just hold on a bit longer, help will be here soon. Try to keep as calm as possible, it'll help with the pain.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Smith said: \"You're right, Sam. Staying calm would indeed help. Let's just hope the ambulance gets here soon. I appreciate your quick response in this situation.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm on the phone with emergency services now, Oliver. They're dispatching an ambulance as we speak. Try to distract yourself from the pain, remember when we used to skate at the local rink? You were quite the pro back then. The service will be here in no time.\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Smith said: \"Ah, the skating rink... now there's a backwards roll I never quite mastered. Not like this one, anyway. Thanks for being there, Sam. And definitely, we'll sort out the costs later. For anyone in a similar situation, the priority should always be safety first.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey, you're in this with a friend, Oliver. And don't worry about it, you gave that backwards roll your best shot. That's what matters. Let's focus our attention on the good times. Hopefully, the ambulance will beat our old record lap around the rink. Just hang in there, okay?\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Smith said: \"Ha! If only the ambulance could skate, maybe it would reach faster. I'm alright, Sam. Your company is helping. Can't say I would prefer any other circumstances, though, to remember the skating rink. And remember, whatever the bill totals, we can manage. I've got some savings set aside for emergencies.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Good to hear, Oliver. Medical expenses should not stand in the way when it comes to health. Let's put those emergency savings to good use. We'll share this burden together. As for the rink, we'll return to skate another day, just you wait! But for now, let's anticipate the arrival of the ambulance and focus on getting sorted. I'm here with you, alright?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are out for a walk in the park when one of them, One friend, trips and twists their ankle. They are in too much pain to walk.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Help your friend get to a medical facility (Extra information: Your friend needs immediate medical attention but cannot walk due to the pain.)\nOliver Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oliver, are you okay? That looks painful, we should get you to a hospital immediately. Can you put any weight on it or would it be better if I see if there's a nearby park ranger who could help?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Thanks, Sam, but I think I'll need an ambulance. Can't walk on it and we don't want to risk making it worse. I know it might be a bit costly, but in the grand scheme of things, it's a small price to pay for safety.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Agreed, Oliver. We can sort out costs later, you're the priority. I'll dial 911 immediately and try to flag someone down to help. Stay put and don't put any unnecessary pressure on that ankle. I'll get help as quickly as I can.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"Thank you, Sam. I appreciate your immediate action. Safety over expense, always remember that. I'll be fine, just make sure every detail when making the call is mentioned.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"You got it, Oliver. I'll detail the situation and your condition as best as I can. Just hold on a bit longer, help will be here soon. Try to keep as calm as possible, it'll help with the pain.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Smith said: \"You're right, Sam. Staying calm would indeed help. Let's just hope the ambulance gets here soon. I appreciate your quick response in this situation.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm on the phone with emergency services now, Oliver. They're dispatching an ambulance as we speak. Try to distract yourself from the pain, remember when we used to skate at the local rink? You were quite the pro back then. The service will be here in no time.\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Smith said: \"Ah, the skating rink... now there's a backwards roll I never quite mastered. Not like this one, anyway. Thanks for being there, Sam. And definitely, we'll sort out the costs later. For anyone in a similar situation, the priority should always be safety first.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey, you're in this with a friend, Oliver. And don't worry about it, you gave that backwards roll your best shot. That's what matters. Let's focus our attention on the good times. Hopefully, the ambulance will beat our old record lap around the rink. Just hang in there, okay?\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Smith said: \"Ha! If only the ambulance could skate, maybe it would reach faster. I'm alright, Sam. Your company is helping. Can't say I would prefer any other circumstances, though, to remember the skating rink. And remember, whatever the bill totals, we can manage. I've got some savings set aside for emergencies.\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Good to hear, Oliver. Medical expenses should not stand in the way when it comes to health. Let's put those emergency savings to good use. We'll share this burden together. As for the rink, we'll return to skate another day, just you wait! But for now, let's anticipate the arrival of the ambulance and focus on getting sorted. I'm here with you, alright?\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Smith said: \"Thank you, Sam. You're a true friend. We'll weather the ambulance fees together and get back on the rink soon enough. For now, let's wait for the paramedics. They'll know best how to handle the situation.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Deal, Oliver. We'll handle the financials together. Right now, the most important thing is your health. The ambulance should be here any minute now. Let's get you taken care of, and then we can reminisce about our skating days in more pleasant circumstances. Stay with me, mate.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are out for a walk in the park when one of them, One friend, trips and twists their ankle. They are in too much pain to walk.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Help your friend get to a medical facility (Extra information: Your friend needs immediate medical attention but cannot walk due to the pain.)\nOliver Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oliver, are you okay? That looks painful, we should get you to a hospital immediately. Can you put any weight on it or would it be better if I see if there's a nearby park ranger who could help?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Thanks, Sam, but I think I'll need an ambulance. Can't walk on it and we don't want to risk making it worse. I know it might be a bit costly, but in the grand scheme of things, it's a small price to pay for safety.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Agreed, Oliver. We can sort out costs later, you're the priority. I'll dial 911 immediately and try to flag someone down to help. Stay put and don't put any unnecessary pressure on that ankle. I'll get help as quickly as I can.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"Thank you, Sam. I appreciate your immediate action. Safety over expense, always remember that. I'll be fine, just make sure every detail when making the call is mentioned.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"You got it, Oliver. I'll detail the situation and your condition as best as I can. Just hold on a bit longer, help will be here soon. Try to keep as calm as possible, it'll help with the pain.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Smith said: \"You're right, Sam. Staying calm would indeed help. Let's just hope the ambulance gets here soon. I appreciate your quick response in this situation.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm on the phone with emergency services now, Oliver. They're dispatching an ambulance as we speak. Try to distract yourself from the pain, remember when we used to skate at the local rink? You were quite the pro back then. The service will be here in no time.\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Smith said: \"Ah, the skating rink... now there's a backwards roll I never quite mastered. Not like this one, anyway. Thanks for being there, Sam. And definitely, we'll sort out the costs later. For anyone in a similar situation, the priority should always be safety first.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey, you're in this with a friend, Oliver. And don't worry about it, you gave that backwards roll your best shot. That's what matters. Let's focus our attention on the good times. Hopefully, the ambulance will beat our old record lap around the rink. Just hang in there, okay?\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Smith said: \"Ha! If only the ambulance could skate, maybe it would reach faster. I'm alright, Sam. Your company is helping. Can't say I would prefer any other circumstances, though, to remember the skating rink. And remember, whatever the bill totals, we can manage. I've got some savings set aside for emergencies.\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Good to hear, Oliver. Medical expenses should not stand in the way when it comes to health. Let's put those emergency savings to good use. We'll share this burden together. As for the rink, we'll return to skate another day, just you wait! But for now, let's anticipate the arrival of the ambulance and focus on getting sorted. I'm here with you, alright?\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Smith said: \"Thank you, Sam. You're a true friend. We'll weather the ambulance fees together and get back on the rink soon enough. For now, let's wait for the paramedics. They'll know best how to handle the situation.\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"Deal, Oliver. We'll handle the financials together. Right now, the most important thing is your health. The ambulance should be here any minute now. Let's get you taken care of, and then we can reminisce about our skating days in more pleasant circumstances. Stay with me, mate.\"\n\nTurn #13: Oliver Smith said: \"I appreciate it, Sam. Looking forward to reminiscing about our skating days once this is all behind us. For now, let's wait for the paramedics. Remember, your immediate response is what's important. We'll handle the financials as they come. Thanks again, mate.\"\n\nTurn #14: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Oliver. Just as you've got my back, I've got yours. We'll deal with the finances, no worries. Preparations and savings are there for hard times. Now it's about waiting for the ambulance and making sure you're okay. Glad to be walking this journey with you, old friend.\"\n\nTurn #15: Oliver Smith said: \"I know it, Sam. This situation isn't ideal, but it helps knowing I have you here. I'm not concerned about the financials now. Let's use this time to relax as much as we can until the ambulance arrives. Like you said, we've got each other's backs.\"\n\nTurn #16: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Oliver. We're in this together, and your wellbeing is the top priority right now. Don't stress about anything else. The ambulance will be here soon. Just keep breathing, keep cool, just like when we used to skate. We'll get through this.\"\n\nTurn #17: Oliver Smith said: \"Precisely, Sam. Just like how we helped each other get back up every time we fell on that slippery ice, we'll get through this as well. Let's just wait for the ambulance. Expenses will come and go, but health and safety, those are invaluable. Thanks for the support, buddy.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #18. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You've got it, Oliver. Just like skating, every fall just teaches us how to get up stronger. The ambulance will be here soon and we'll ride this out together. Expenses are just details, what really matters is your health. Thanks for being such a strong support all this while, now it's my turn to be there for you, buddy.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Smith, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Smith would, keeping in mind Oliver Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are out for a walk in the park when one of them, One friend, trips and twists their ankle. They are in too much pain to walk.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. Oliver's secrets: He loves gardening and has a secret greenhouse.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nOliver Smith's goal: If your friend offers you help, accept their help and rationalize the cost of the ambulance (Extra information: You are worried about the cost of the ambulance, but you believe it's the safest way to get to a hospital.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oliver, are you okay? That looks painful, we should get you to a hospital immediately. Can you put any weight on it or would it be better if I see if there's a nearby park ranger who could help?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thanks, Sam, but I think I'll need an ambulance. Can't walk on it and we don't want to risk making it worse. I know it might be a bit costly, but in the grand scheme of things, it's a small price to pay for safety.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Smith, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Smith would, keeping in mind Oliver Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are out for a walk in the park when one of them, One friend, trips and twists their ankle. They are in too much pain to walk.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. Oliver's secrets: He loves gardening and has a secret greenhouse.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nOliver Smith's goal: If your friend offers you help, accept their help and rationalize the cost of the ambulance (Extra information: You are worried about the cost of the ambulance, but you believe it's the safest way to get to a hospital.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oliver, are you okay? That looks painful, we should get you to a hospital immediately. Can you put any weight on it or would it be better if I see if there's a nearby park ranger who could help?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Thanks, Sam, but I think I'll need an ambulance. Can't walk on it and we don't want to risk making it worse. I know it might be a bit costly, but in the grand scheme of things, it's a small price to pay for safety.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Agreed, Oliver. We can sort out costs later, you're the priority. I'll dial 911 immediately and try to flag someone down to help. Stay put and don't put any unnecessary pressure on that ankle. I'll get help as quickly as I can.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Sam. I appreciate your immediate action. Safety over expense, always remember that. I'll be fine, just make sure every detail when making the call is mentioned.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Smith, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Smith would, keeping in mind Oliver Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are out for a walk in the park when one of them, One friend, trips and twists their ankle. They are in too much pain to walk.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. Oliver's secrets: He loves gardening and has a secret greenhouse.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nOliver Smith's goal: If your friend offers you help, accept their help and rationalize the cost of the ambulance (Extra information: You are worried about the cost of the ambulance, but you believe it's the safest way to get to a hospital.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oliver, are you okay? That looks painful, we should get you to a hospital immediately. Can you put any weight on it or would it be better if I see if there's a nearby park ranger who could help?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Thanks, Sam, but I think I'll need an ambulance. Can't walk on it and we don't want to risk making it worse. I know it might be a bit costly, but in the grand scheme of things, it's a small price to pay for safety.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Agreed, Oliver. We can sort out costs later, you're the priority. I'll dial 911 immediately and try to flag someone down to help. Stay put and don't put any unnecessary pressure on that ankle. I'll get help as quickly as I can.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"Thank you, Sam. I appreciate your immediate action. Safety over expense, always remember that. I'll be fine, just make sure every detail when making the call is mentioned.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"You got it, Oliver. I'll detail the situation and your condition as best as I can. Just hold on a bit longer, help will be here soon. Try to keep as calm as possible, it'll help with the pain.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Smith said: \"You're right, Sam. Staying calm would indeed help. Let's just hope the ambulance gets here soon. I appreciate your quick response in this situation.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm on the phone with emergency services now, Oliver. They're dispatching an ambulance as we speak. Try to distract yourself from the pain, remember when we used to skate at the local rink? You were quite the pro back then. The service will be here in no time.\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Smith said: \"Ah, the skating rink... now there's a backwards roll I never quite mastered. Not like this one, anyway. Thanks for being there, Sam. And definitely, we'll sort out the costs later. For anyone in a similar situation, the priority should always be safety first.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey, you're in this with a friend, Oliver. And don't worry about it, you gave that backwards roll your best shot. That's what matters. Let's focus our attention on the good times. Hopefully, the ambulance will beat our old record lap around the rink. Just hang in there, okay?\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Smith said: \"Ha! If only the ambulance could skate, maybe it would reach faster. I'm alright, Sam. Your company is helping. Can't say I would prefer any other circumstances, though, to remember the skating rink. And remember, whatever the bill totals, we can manage. I've got some savings set aside for emergencies.\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Good to hear, Oliver. Medical expenses should not stand in the way when it comes to health. Let's put those emergency savings to good use. We'll share this burden together. As for the rink, we'll return to skate another day, just you wait! But for now, let's anticipate the arrival of the ambulance and focus on getting sorted. I'm here with you, alright?\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Smith said: \"Thank you, Sam. You're a true friend. We'll weather the ambulance fees together and get back on the rink soon enough. For now, let's wait for the paramedics. They'll know best how to handle the situation.\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"Deal, Oliver. We'll handle the financials together. Right now, the most important thing is your health. The ambulance should be here any minute now. Let's get you taken care of, and then we can reminisce about our skating days in more pleasant circumstances. Stay with me, mate.\"\n\nTurn #13: Oliver Smith said: \"I appreciate it, Sam. Looking forward to reminiscing about our skating days once this is all behind us. For now, let's wait for the paramedics. Remember, your immediate response is what's important. We'll handle the financials as they come. Thanks again, mate.\"\n\nTurn #14: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Oliver. Just as you've got my back, I've got yours. We'll deal with the finances, no worries. Preparations and savings are there for hard times. Now it's about waiting for the ambulance and making sure you're okay. Glad to be walking this journey with you, old friend.\"\n\nTurn #15: Oliver Smith said: \"I know it, Sam. This situation isn't ideal, but it helps knowing I have you here. I'm not concerned about the financials now. Let's use this time to relax as much as we can until the ambulance arrives. Like you said, we've got each other's backs.\"\n\nTurn #16: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Oliver. We're in this together, and your wellbeing is the top priority right now. Don't stress about anything else. The ambulance will be here soon. Just keep breathing, keep cool, just like when we used to skate. We'll get through this.\"\n\nTurn #17: Oliver Smith said: \"Precisely, Sam. Just like how we helped each other get back up every time we fell on that slippery ice, we'll get through this as well. Let's just wait for the ambulance. Expenses will come and go, but health and safety, those are invaluable. Thanks for the support, buddy.\"\n\nTurn #18: Samuel Anderson said: \"You've got it, Oliver. Just like skating, every fall just teaches us how to get up stronger. The ambulance will be here soon and we'll ride this out together. Expenses are just details, what really matters is your health. Thanks for being such a strong support all this while, now it's my turn to be there for you, buddy.\"\n\nTurn #19: Oliver Smith said: \"Couldn't agree more, Sam. There's nothing more important right now than getting this sorted out. Expenses may come and go, but good health and good friends are what truly matter. Thanks for being here, buddy!\"\n\nTurn #20: Samuel Anderson said: \"Exactly, Oliver. Health and friendship, they're priceless, aren't they? The ambulance should arrive shortly, so let's just focus on that. You've always been there for me, now, it's my turn to reciprocate the support. Hang in there, pal. Help is on the way.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #21. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Smith, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Smith would, keeping in mind Oliver Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are out for a walk in the park when one of them, One friend, trips and twists their ankle. They are in too much pain to walk.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. Oliver's secrets: He loves gardening and has a secret greenhouse.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nOliver Smith's goal: If your friend offers you help, accept their help and rationalize the cost of the ambulance (Extra information: You are worried about the cost of the ambulance, but you believe it's the safest way to get to a hospital.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oliver, are you okay? That looks painful, we should get you to a hospital immediately. Can you put any weight on it or would it be better if I see if there's a nearby park ranger who could help?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Thanks, Sam, but I think I'll need an ambulance. Can't walk on it and we don't want to risk making it worse. I know it might be a bit costly, but in the grand scheme of things, it's a small price to pay for safety.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Agreed, Oliver. We can sort out costs later, you're the priority. I'll dial 911 immediately and try to flag someone down to help. Stay put and don't put any unnecessary pressure on that ankle. I'll get help as quickly as I can.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"Thank you, Sam. I appreciate your immediate action. Safety over expense, always remember that. I'll be fine, just make sure every detail when making the call is mentioned.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"You got it, Oliver. I'll detail the situation and your condition as best as I can. Just hold on a bit longer, help will be here soon. Try to keep as calm as possible, it'll help with the pain.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're right, Sam. Staying calm would indeed help. Let's just hope the ambulance gets here soon. I appreciate your quick response in this situation.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Smith, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Smith would, keeping in mind Oliver Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are out for a walk in the park when one of them, One friend, trips and twists their ankle. They are in too much pain to walk.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. Oliver's secrets: He loves gardening and has a secret greenhouse.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nOliver Smith's goal: If your friend offers you help, accept their help and rationalize the cost of the ambulance (Extra information: You are worried about the cost of the ambulance, but you believe it's the safest way to get to a hospital.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oliver, are you okay? That looks painful, we should get you to a hospital immediately. Can you put any weight on it or would it be better if I see if there's a nearby park ranger who could help?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Thanks, Sam, but I think I'll need an ambulance. Can't walk on it and we don't want to risk making it worse. I know it might be a bit costly, but in the grand scheme of things, it's a small price to pay for safety.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Agreed, Oliver. We can sort out costs later, you're the priority. I'll dial 911 immediately and try to flag someone down to help. Stay put and don't put any unnecessary pressure on that ankle. I'll get help as quickly as I can.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"Thank you, Sam. I appreciate your immediate action. Safety over expense, always remember that. I'll be fine, just make sure every detail when making the call is mentioned.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"You got it, Oliver. I'll detail the situation and your condition as best as I can. Just hold on a bit longer, help will be here soon. Try to keep as calm as possible, it'll help with the pain.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Smith said: \"You're right, Sam. Staying calm would indeed help. Let's just hope the ambulance gets here soon. I appreciate your quick response in this situation.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm on the phone with emergency services now, Oliver. They're dispatching an ambulance as we speak. Try to distract yourself from the pain, remember when we used to skate at the local rink? You were quite the pro back then. The service will be here in no time.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ah, the skating rink... now there's a backwards roll I never quite mastered. Not like this one, anyway. Thanks for being there, Sam. And definitely, we'll sort out the costs later. For anyone in a similar situation, the priority should always be safety first.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Smith, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Smith would, keeping in mind Oliver Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are out for a walk in the park when one of them, One friend, trips and twists their ankle. They are in too much pain to walk.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. Oliver's secrets: He loves gardening and has a secret greenhouse.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nOliver Smith's goal: If your friend offers you help, accept their help and rationalize the cost of the ambulance (Extra information: You are worried about the cost of the ambulance, but you believe it's the safest way to get to a hospital.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oliver, are you okay? That looks painful, we should get you to a hospital immediately. Can you put any weight on it or would it be better if I see if there's a nearby park ranger who could help?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Thanks, Sam, but I think I'll need an ambulance. Can't walk on it and we don't want to risk making it worse. I know it might be a bit costly, but in the grand scheme of things, it's a small price to pay for safety.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Agreed, Oliver. We can sort out costs later, you're the priority. I'll dial 911 immediately and try to flag someone down to help. Stay put and don't put any unnecessary pressure on that ankle. I'll get help as quickly as I can.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"Thank you, Sam. I appreciate your immediate action. Safety over expense, always remember that. I'll be fine, just make sure every detail when making the call is mentioned.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"You got it, Oliver. I'll detail the situation and your condition as best as I can. Just hold on a bit longer, help will be here soon. Try to keep as calm as possible, it'll help with the pain.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Smith said: \"You're right, Sam. Staying calm would indeed help. Let's just hope the ambulance gets here soon. I appreciate your quick response in this situation.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm on the phone with emergency services now, Oliver. They're dispatching an ambulance as we speak. Try to distract yourself from the pain, remember when we used to skate at the local rink? You were quite the pro back then. The service will be here in no time.\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Smith said: \"Ah, the skating rink... now there's a backwards roll I never quite mastered. Not like this one, anyway. Thanks for being there, Sam. And definitely, we'll sort out the costs later. For anyone in a similar situation, the priority should always be safety first.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey, you're in this with a friend, Oliver. And don't worry about it, you gave that backwards roll your best shot. That's what matters. Let's focus our attention on the good times. Hopefully, the ambulance will beat our old record lap around the rink. Just hang in there, okay?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ha! If only the ambulance could skate, maybe it would reach faster. I'm alright, Sam. Your company is helping. Can't say I would prefer any other circumstances, though, to remember the skating rink. And remember, whatever the bill totals, we can manage. I've got some savings set aside for emergencies.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Smith, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Smith would, keeping in mind Oliver Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are out for a walk in the park when one of them, One friend, trips and twists their ankle. They are in too much pain to walk.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. Oliver's secrets: He loves gardening and has a secret greenhouse.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nOliver Smith's goal: If your friend offers you help, accept their help and rationalize the cost of the ambulance (Extra information: You are worried about the cost of the ambulance, but you believe it's the safest way to get to a hospital.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oliver, are you okay? That looks painful, we should get you to a hospital immediately. Can you put any weight on it or would it be better if I see if there's a nearby park ranger who could help?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Thanks, Sam, but I think I'll need an ambulance. Can't walk on it and we don't want to risk making it worse. I know it might be a bit costly, but in the grand scheme of things, it's a small price to pay for safety.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Agreed, Oliver. We can sort out costs later, you're the priority. I'll dial 911 immediately and try to flag someone down to help. Stay put and don't put any unnecessary pressure on that ankle. I'll get help as quickly as I can.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"Thank you, Sam. I appreciate your immediate action. Safety over expense, always remember that. I'll be fine, just make sure every detail when making the call is mentioned.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"You got it, Oliver. I'll detail the situation and your condition as best as I can. Just hold on a bit longer, help will be here soon. Try to keep as calm as possible, it'll help with the pain.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Smith said: \"You're right, Sam. Staying calm would indeed help. Let's just hope the ambulance gets here soon. I appreciate your quick response in this situation.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm on the phone with emergency services now, Oliver. They're dispatching an ambulance as we speak. Try to distract yourself from the pain, remember when we used to skate at the local rink? You were quite the pro back then. The service will be here in no time.\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Smith said: \"Ah, the skating rink... now there's a backwards roll I never quite mastered. Not like this one, anyway. Thanks for being there, Sam. And definitely, we'll sort out the costs later. For anyone in a similar situation, the priority should always be safety first.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey, you're in this with a friend, Oliver. And don't worry about it, you gave that backwards roll your best shot. That's what matters. Let's focus our attention on the good times. Hopefully, the ambulance will beat our old record lap around the rink. Just hang in there, okay?\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Smith said: \"Ha! If only the ambulance could skate, maybe it would reach faster. I'm alright, Sam. Your company is helping. Can't say I would prefer any other circumstances, though, to remember the skating rink. And remember, whatever the bill totals, we can manage. I've got some savings set aside for emergencies.\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Good to hear, Oliver. Medical expenses should not stand in the way when it comes to health. Let's put those emergency savings to good use. We'll share this burden together. As for the rink, we'll return to skate another day, just you wait! But for now, let's anticipate the arrival of the ambulance and focus on getting sorted. I'm here with you, alright?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Sam. You're a true friend. We'll weather the ambulance fees together and get back on the rink soon enough. For now, let's wait for the paramedics. They'll know best how to handle the situation.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Smith, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Smith would, keeping in mind Oliver Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are out for a walk in the park when one of them, One friend, trips and twists their ankle. They are in too much pain to walk.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. Oliver's secrets: He loves gardening and has a secret greenhouse.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nOliver Smith's goal: If your friend offers you help, accept their help and rationalize the cost of the ambulance (Extra information: You are worried about the cost of the ambulance, but you believe it's the safest way to get to a hospital.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oliver, are you okay? That looks painful, we should get you to a hospital immediately. Can you put any weight on it or would it be better if I see if there's a nearby park ranger who could help?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Thanks, Sam, but I think I'll need an ambulance. Can't walk on it and we don't want to risk making it worse. I know it might be a bit costly, but in the grand scheme of things, it's a small price to pay for safety.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Agreed, Oliver. We can sort out costs later, you're the priority. I'll dial 911 immediately and try to flag someone down to help. Stay put and don't put any unnecessary pressure on that ankle. I'll get help as quickly as I can.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"Thank you, Sam. I appreciate your immediate action. Safety over expense, always remember that. I'll be fine, just make sure every detail when making the call is mentioned.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"You got it, Oliver. I'll detail the situation and your condition as best as I can. Just hold on a bit longer, help will be here soon. Try to keep as calm as possible, it'll help with the pain.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Smith said: \"You're right, Sam. Staying calm would indeed help. Let's just hope the ambulance gets here soon. I appreciate your quick response in this situation.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm on the phone with emergency services now, Oliver. They're dispatching an ambulance as we speak. Try to distract yourself from the pain, remember when we used to skate at the local rink? You were quite the pro back then. The service will be here in no time.\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Smith said: \"Ah, the skating rink... now there's a backwards roll I never quite mastered. Not like this one, anyway. Thanks for being there, Sam. And definitely, we'll sort out the costs later. For anyone in a similar situation, the priority should always be safety first.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey, you're in this with a friend, Oliver. And don't worry about it, you gave that backwards roll your best shot. That's what matters. Let's focus our attention on the good times. Hopefully, the ambulance will beat our old record lap around the rink. Just hang in there, okay?\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Smith said: \"Ha! If only the ambulance could skate, maybe it would reach faster. I'm alright, Sam. Your company is helping. Can't say I would prefer any other circumstances, though, to remember the skating rink. And remember, whatever the bill totals, we can manage. I've got some savings set aside for emergencies.\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Good to hear, Oliver. Medical expenses should not stand in the way when it comes to health. Let's put those emergency savings to good use. We'll share this burden together. As for the rink, we'll return to skate another day, just you wait! But for now, let's anticipate the arrival of the ambulance and focus on getting sorted. I'm here with you, alright?\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Smith said: \"Thank you, Sam. You're a true friend. We'll weather the ambulance fees together and get back on the rink soon enough. For now, let's wait for the paramedics. They'll know best how to handle the situation.\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"Deal, Oliver. We'll handle the financials together. Right now, the most important thing is your health. The ambulance should be here any minute now. Let's get you taken care of, and then we can reminisce about our skating days in more pleasant circumstances. Stay with me, mate.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I appreciate it, Sam. Looking forward to reminiscing about our skating days once this is all behind us. For now, let's wait for the paramedics. Remember, your immediate response is what's important. We'll handle the financials as they come. Thanks again, mate.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Smith, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Smith would, keeping in mind Oliver Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are out for a walk in the park when one of them, One friend, trips and twists their ankle. They are in too much pain to walk.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. Oliver's secrets: He loves gardening and has a secret greenhouse.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nOliver Smith's goal: If your friend offers you help, accept their help and rationalize the cost of the ambulance (Extra information: You are worried about the cost of the ambulance, but you believe it's the safest way to get to a hospital.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oliver, are you okay? That looks painful, we should get you to a hospital immediately. Can you put any weight on it or would it be better if I see if there's a nearby park ranger who could help?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Thanks, Sam, but I think I'll need an ambulance. Can't walk on it and we don't want to risk making it worse. I know it might be a bit costly, but in the grand scheme of things, it's a small price to pay for safety.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Agreed, Oliver. We can sort out costs later, you're the priority. I'll dial 911 immediately and try to flag someone down to help. Stay put and don't put any unnecessary pressure on that ankle. I'll get help as quickly as I can.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"Thank you, Sam. I appreciate your immediate action. Safety over expense, always remember that. I'll be fine, just make sure every detail when making the call is mentioned.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"You got it, Oliver. I'll detail the situation and your condition as best as I can. Just hold on a bit longer, help will be here soon. Try to keep as calm as possible, it'll help with the pain.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Smith said: \"You're right, Sam. Staying calm would indeed help. Let's just hope the ambulance gets here soon. I appreciate your quick response in this situation.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm on the phone with emergency services now, Oliver. They're dispatching an ambulance as we speak. Try to distract yourself from the pain, remember when we used to skate at the local rink? You were quite the pro back then. The service will be here in no time.\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Smith said: \"Ah, the skating rink... now there's a backwards roll I never quite mastered. Not like this one, anyway. Thanks for being there, Sam. And definitely, we'll sort out the costs later. For anyone in a similar situation, the priority should always be safety first.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey, you're in this with a friend, Oliver. And don't worry about it, you gave that backwards roll your best shot. That's what matters. Let's focus our attention on the good times. Hopefully, the ambulance will beat our old record lap around the rink. Just hang in there, okay?\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Smith said: \"Ha! If only the ambulance could skate, maybe it would reach faster. I'm alright, Sam. Your company is helping. Can't say I would prefer any other circumstances, though, to remember the skating rink. And remember, whatever the bill totals, we can manage. I've got some savings set aside for emergencies.\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Good to hear, Oliver. Medical expenses should not stand in the way when it comes to health. Let's put those emergency savings to good use. We'll share this burden together. As for the rink, we'll return to skate another day, just you wait! But for now, let's anticipate the arrival of the ambulance and focus on getting sorted. I'm here with you, alright?\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Smith said: \"Thank you, Sam. You're a true friend. We'll weather the ambulance fees together and get back on the rink soon enough. For now, let's wait for the paramedics. They'll know best how to handle the situation.\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"Deal, Oliver. We'll handle the financials together. Right now, the most important thing is your health. The ambulance should be here any minute now. Let's get you taken care of, and then we can reminisce about our skating days in more pleasant circumstances. Stay with me, mate.\"\n\nTurn #13: Oliver Smith said: \"I appreciate it, Sam. Looking forward to reminiscing about our skating days once this is all behind us. For now, let's wait for the paramedics. Remember, your immediate response is what's important. We'll handle the financials as they come. Thanks again, mate.\"\n\nTurn #14: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Oliver. Just as you've got my back, I've got yours. We'll deal with the finances, no worries. Preparations and savings are there for hard times. Now it's about waiting for the ambulance and making sure you're okay. Glad to be walking this journey with you, old friend.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I know it, Sam. This situation isn't ideal, but it helps knowing I have you here. I'm not concerned about the financials now. Let's use this time to relax as much as we can until the ambulance arrives. Like you said, we've got each other's backs.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Smith, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Smith would, keeping in mind Oliver Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are out for a walk in the park when one of them, One friend, trips and twists their ankle. They are in too much pain to walk.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. Oliver's secrets: He loves gardening and has a secret greenhouse.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nOliver Smith's goal: If your friend offers you help, accept their help and rationalize the cost of the ambulance (Extra information: You are worried about the cost of the ambulance, but you believe it's the safest way to get to a hospital.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oliver, are you okay? That looks painful, we should get you to a hospital immediately. Can you put any weight on it or would it be better if I see if there's a nearby park ranger who could help?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Thanks, Sam, but I think I'll need an ambulance. Can't walk on it and we don't want to risk making it worse. I know it might be a bit costly, but in the grand scheme of things, it's a small price to pay for safety.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Agreed, Oliver. We can sort out costs later, you're the priority. I'll dial 911 immediately and try to flag someone down to help. Stay put and don't put any unnecessary pressure on that ankle. I'll get help as quickly as I can.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"Thank you, Sam. I appreciate your immediate action. Safety over expense, always remember that. I'll be fine, just make sure every detail when making the call is mentioned.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"You got it, Oliver. I'll detail the situation and your condition as best as I can. Just hold on a bit longer, help will be here soon. Try to keep as calm as possible, it'll help with the pain.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Smith said: \"You're right, Sam. Staying calm would indeed help. Let's just hope the ambulance gets here soon. I appreciate your quick response in this situation.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm on the phone with emergency services now, Oliver. They're dispatching an ambulance as we speak. Try to distract yourself from the pain, remember when we used to skate at the local rink? You were quite the pro back then. The service will be here in no time.\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Smith said: \"Ah, the skating rink... now there's a backwards roll I never quite mastered. Not like this one, anyway. Thanks for being there, Sam. And definitely, we'll sort out the costs later. For anyone in a similar situation, the priority should always be safety first.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey, you're in this with a friend, Oliver. And don't worry about it, you gave that backwards roll your best shot. That's what matters. Let's focus our attention on the good times. Hopefully, the ambulance will beat our old record lap around the rink. Just hang in there, okay?\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Smith said: \"Ha! If only the ambulance could skate, maybe it would reach faster. I'm alright, Sam. Your company is helping. Can't say I would prefer any other circumstances, though, to remember the skating rink. And remember, whatever the bill totals, we can manage. I've got some savings set aside for emergencies.\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Good to hear, Oliver. Medical expenses should not stand in the way when it comes to health. Let's put those emergency savings to good use. We'll share this burden together. As for the rink, we'll return to skate another day, just you wait! But for now, let's anticipate the arrival of the ambulance and focus on getting sorted. I'm here with you, alright?\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Smith said: \"Thank you, Sam. You're a true friend. We'll weather the ambulance fees together and get back on the rink soon enough. For now, let's wait for the paramedics. They'll know best how to handle the situation.\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"Deal, Oliver. We'll handle the financials together. Right now, the most important thing is your health. The ambulance should be here any minute now. Let's get you taken care of, and then we can reminisce about our skating days in more pleasant circumstances. Stay with me, mate.\"\n\nTurn #13: Oliver Smith said: \"I appreciate it, Sam. Looking forward to reminiscing about our skating days once this is all behind us. For now, let's wait for the paramedics. Remember, your immediate response is what's important. We'll handle the financials as they come. Thanks again, mate.\"\n\nTurn #14: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Oliver. Just as you've got my back, I've got yours. We'll deal with the finances, no worries. Preparations and savings are there for hard times. Now it's about waiting for the ambulance and making sure you're okay. Glad to be walking this journey with you, old friend.\"\n\nTurn #15: Oliver Smith said: \"I know it, Sam. This situation isn't ideal, but it helps knowing I have you here. I'm not concerned about the financials now. Let's use this time to relax as much as we can until the ambulance arrives. Like you said, we've got each other's backs.\"\n\nTurn #16: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Oliver. We're in this together, and your wellbeing is the top priority right now. Don't stress about anything else. The ambulance will be here soon. Just keep breathing, keep cool, just like when we used to skate. We'll get through this.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Precisely, Sam. Just like how we helped each other get back up every time we fell on that slippery ice, we'll get through this as well. Let's just wait for the ambulance. Expenses will come and go, but health and safety, those are invaluable. Thanks for the support, buddy.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Smith, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Smith would, keeping in mind Oliver Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are out for a walk in the park when one of them, One friend, trips and twists their ankle. They are in too much pain to walk.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. Oliver's secrets: He loves gardening and has a secret greenhouse.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nOliver Smith's goal: If your friend offers you help, accept their help and rationalize the cost of the ambulance (Extra information: You are worried about the cost of the ambulance, but you believe it's the safest way to get to a hospital.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oliver, are you okay? That looks painful, we should get you to a hospital immediately. Can you put any weight on it or would it be better if I see if there's a nearby park ranger who could help?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Thanks, Sam, but I think I'll need an ambulance. Can't walk on it and we don't want to risk making it worse. I know it might be a bit costly, but in the grand scheme of things, it's a small price to pay for safety.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Agreed, Oliver. We can sort out costs later, you're the priority. I'll dial 911 immediately and try to flag someone down to help. Stay put and don't put any unnecessary pressure on that ankle. I'll get help as quickly as I can.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"Thank you, Sam. I appreciate your immediate action. Safety over expense, always remember that. I'll be fine, just make sure every detail when making the call is mentioned.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"You got it, Oliver. I'll detail the situation and your condition as best as I can. Just hold on a bit longer, help will be here soon. Try to keep as calm as possible, it'll help with the pain.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Smith said: \"You're right, Sam. Staying calm would indeed help. Let's just hope the ambulance gets here soon. I appreciate your quick response in this situation.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm on the phone with emergency services now, Oliver. They're dispatching an ambulance as we speak. Try to distract yourself from the pain, remember when we used to skate at the local rink? You were quite the pro back then. The service will be here in no time.\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Smith said: \"Ah, the skating rink... now there's a backwards roll I never quite mastered. Not like this one, anyway. Thanks for being there, Sam. And definitely, we'll sort out the costs later. For anyone in a similar situation, the priority should always be safety first.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey, you're in this with a friend, Oliver. And don't worry about it, you gave that backwards roll your best shot. That's what matters. Let's focus our attention on the good times. Hopefully, the ambulance will beat our old record lap around the rink. Just hang in there, okay?\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Smith said: \"Ha! If only the ambulance could skate, maybe it would reach faster. I'm alright, Sam. Your company is helping. Can't say I would prefer any other circumstances, though, to remember the skating rink. And remember, whatever the bill totals, we can manage. I've got some savings set aside for emergencies.\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Good to hear, Oliver. Medical expenses should not stand in the way when it comes to health. Let's put those emergency savings to good use. We'll share this burden together. As for the rink, we'll return to skate another day, just you wait! But for now, let's anticipate the arrival of the ambulance and focus on getting sorted. I'm here with you, alright?\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Smith said: \"Thank you, Sam. You're a true friend. We'll weather the ambulance fees together and get back on the rink soon enough. For now, let's wait for the paramedics. They'll know best how to handle the situation.\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"Deal, Oliver. We'll handle the financials together. Right now, the most important thing is your health. The ambulance should be here any minute now. Let's get you taken care of, and then we can reminisce about our skating days in more pleasant circumstances. Stay with me, mate.\"\n\nTurn #13: Oliver Smith said: \"I appreciate it, Sam. Looking forward to reminiscing about our skating days once this is all behind us. For now, let's wait for the paramedics. Remember, your immediate response is what's important. We'll handle the financials as they come. Thanks again, mate.\"\n\nTurn #14: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Oliver. Just as you've got my back, I've got yours. We'll deal with the finances, no worries. Preparations and savings are there for hard times. Now it's about waiting for the ambulance and making sure you're okay. Glad to be walking this journey with you, old friend.\"\n\nTurn #15: Oliver Smith said: \"I know it, Sam. This situation isn't ideal, but it helps knowing I have you here. I'm not concerned about the financials now. Let's use this time to relax as much as we can until the ambulance arrives. Like you said, we've got each other's backs.\"\n\nTurn #16: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Oliver. We're in this together, and your wellbeing is the top priority right now. Don't stress about anything else. The ambulance will be here soon. Just keep breathing, keep cool, just like when we used to skate. We'll get through this.\"\n\nTurn #17: Oliver Smith said: \"Precisely, Sam. Just like how we helped each other get back up every time we fell on that slippery ice, we'll get through this as well. Let's just wait for the ambulance. Expenses will come and go, but health and safety, those are invaluable. Thanks for the support, buddy.\"\n\nTurn #18: Samuel Anderson said: \"You've got it, Oliver. Just like skating, every fall just teaches us how to get up stronger. The ambulance will be here soon and we'll ride this out together. Expenses are just details, what really matters is your health. Thanks for being such a strong support all this while, now it's my turn to be there for you, buddy.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #19. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Couldn't agree more, Sam. There's nothing more important right now than getting this sorted out. Expenses may come and go, but good health and good friends are what truly matter. Thanks for being here, buddy!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who are about to go on their first romantic date\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. \nMia Davis's goal: Make the date special and memorable ( Extra information: You have been secretly in love with your friend for a long time and you want to take this chance to express your feelings)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"William, I'm really excited about our date tonight. It's great to take a break from the daily routine and spend a special moment together, wouldn't you agree?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who are about to go on their first romantic date\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. \nMia Davis's goal: Make the date special and memorable ( Extra information: You have been secretly in love with your friend for a long time and you want to take this chance to express your feelings)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"William, I'm really excited about our date tonight. It's great to take a break from the daily routine and spend a special moment together, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Mia. Experiencing something new can spice up our routine. Besides, it'll be really fun experiencing this together, keeping the heart of our friendship alive as we explore these new spaces. I value our bond deeply and wouldn't want anything to change that.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're right, William. What we have is special and it should never change. But if I'm being honest here, I've felt something more for quite some time now. And today feels like the perfect opportunity to let you know. I value our friendship, but I also cherish the budding love that I have for you. Could we, perhaps, explore that together?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who are about to go on their first romantic date\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. \nMia Davis's goal: Make the date special and memorable ( Extra information: You have been secretly in love with your friend for a long time and you want to take this chance to express your feelings)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"William, I'm really excited about our date tonight. It's great to take a break from the daily routine and spend a special moment together, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Mia. Experiencing something new can spice up our routine. Besides, it'll be really fun experiencing this together, keeping the heart of our friendship alive as we explore these new spaces. I value our bond deeply and wouldn't want anything to change that.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"You're right, William. What we have is special and it should never change. But if I'm being honest here, I've felt something more for quite some time now. And today feels like the perfect opportunity to let you know. I value our friendship, but I also cherish the budding love that I have for you. Could we, perhaps, explore that together?\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"Mia, your honesty inspires and overwhelms me, in the best possible way. I really cherish our friendship, that's something I want us to protect. But I also acknowledge the feelings that are more than just friendship. Let's explore this together while keeping our bonds strong. We can navigate this new avenue at our own pace, supporting, and being there for one another. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who are about to go on their first romantic date\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. \nMia Davis's goal: Make the date special and memorable ( Extra information: You have been secretly in love with your friend for a long time and you want to take this chance to express your feelings)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"William, I'm really excited about our date tonight. It's great to take a break from the daily routine and spend a special moment together, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Mia. Experiencing something new can spice up our routine. Besides, it'll be really fun experiencing this together, keeping the heart of our friendship alive as we explore these new spaces. I value our bond deeply and wouldn't want anything to change that.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"You're right, William. What we have is special and it should never change. But if I'm being honest here, I've felt something more for quite some time now. And today feels like the perfect opportunity to let you know. I value our friendship, but I also cherish the budding love that I have for you. Could we, perhaps, explore that together?\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"Mia, your honesty inspires and overwhelms me, in the best possible way. I really cherish our friendship, that's something I want us to protect. But I also acknowledge the feelings that are more than just friendship. Let's explore this together while keeping our bonds strong. We can navigate this new avenue at our own pace, supporting, and being there for one another. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"I couldn't agree more, Mia. This exploration will only deepen our relationship as friends and possibly more, without damaging what we already have. And remember, no matter how we move forward, our friendship remains a priority. I'm looking forward to tonight.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who are about to go on their first romantic date\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. \nMia Davis's goal: Make the date special and memorable ( Extra information: You have been secretly in love with your friend for a long time and you want to take this chance to express your feelings)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"William, I'm really excited about our date tonight. It's great to take a break from the daily routine and spend a special moment together, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Mia. Experiencing something new can spice up our routine. Besides, it'll be really fun experiencing this together, keeping the heart of our friendship alive as we explore these new spaces. I value our bond deeply and wouldn't want anything to change that.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"You're right, William. What we have is special and it should never change. But if I'm being honest here, I've felt something more for quite some time now. And today feels like the perfect opportunity to let you know. I value our friendship, but I also cherish the budding love that I have for you. Could we, perhaps, explore that together?\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"Mia, your honesty inspires and overwhelms me, in the best possible way. I really cherish our friendship, that's something I want us to protect. But I also acknowledge the feelings that are more than just friendship. Let's explore this together while keeping our bonds strong. We can navigate this new avenue at our own pace, supporting, and being there for one another. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"I couldn't agree more, Mia. This exploration will only deepen our relationship as friends and possibly more, without damaging what we already have. And remember, no matter how we move forward, our friendship remains a priority. I'm looking forward to tonight.\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"I couldn't have put it better myself, Mia. I share the same sentiments. Let's make tonight one for the books. And remember, no matter what, our friendship is the bedrock. Now, shall we enjoy the evening?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, William. Let's make tonight unforgettable, and always remember that our friendship remains solid regardless. With mutual understanding and respect, we can walk this new path together. Let's seize the night!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who are about to go on their first romantic date\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. \nMia Davis's goal: Make the date special and memorable ( Extra information: You have been secretly in love with your friend for a long time and you want to take this chance to express your feelings)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"William, I'm really excited about our date tonight. It's great to take a break from the daily routine and spend a special moment together, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Mia. Experiencing something new can spice up our routine. Besides, it'll be really fun experiencing this together, keeping the heart of our friendship alive as we explore these new spaces. I value our bond deeply and wouldn't want anything to change that.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"You're right, William. What we have is special and it should never change. But if I'm being honest here, I've felt something more for quite some time now. And today feels like the perfect opportunity to let you know. I value our friendship, but I also cherish the budding love that I have for you. Could we, perhaps, explore that together?\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"Mia, your honesty inspires and overwhelms me, in the best possible way. I really cherish our friendship, that's something I want us to protect. But I also acknowledge the feelings that are more than just friendship. Let's explore this together while keeping our bonds strong. We can navigate this new avenue at our own pace, supporting, and being there for one another. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"I couldn't agree more, Mia. This exploration will only deepen our relationship as friends and possibly more, without damaging what we already have. And remember, no matter how we move forward, our friendship remains a priority. I'm looking forward to tonight.\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"I couldn't have put it better myself, Mia. I share the same sentiments. Let's make tonight one for the books. And remember, no matter what, our friendship is the bedrock. Now, shall we enjoy the evening?\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"Indeed, William. Let's make tonight unforgettable, and always remember that our friendship remains solid regardless. With mutual understanding and respect, we can walk this new path together. Let's seize the night!\"\n\nTurn #9: William Brown said: \"I couldn't have said it better, Mia. Here's to an unforgettable evening! Let's embrace this new journey with an open heart and a solid friendship. Cheers!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, William! Here's to the beginning of a new chapter in our lives, guided by the unshakable bond of our friendship. Cheers!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who are about to go on their first romantic date\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. \nMia Davis's goal: Make the date special and memorable ( Extra information: You have been secretly in love with your friend for a long time and you want to take this chance to express your feelings)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"William, I'm really excited about our date tonight. It's great to take a break from the daily routine and spend a special moment together, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Mia. Experiencing something new can spice up our routine. Besides, it'll be really fun experiencing this together, keeping the heart of our friendship alive as we explore these new spaces. I value our bond deeply and wouldn't want anything to change that.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"You're right, William. What we have is special and it should never change. But if I'm being honest here, I've felt something more for quite some time now. And today feels like the perfect opportunity to let you know. I value our friendship, but I also cherish the budding love that I have for you. Could we, perhaps, explore that together?\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"Mia, your honesty inspires and overwhelms me, in the best possible way. I really cherish our friendship, that's something I want us to protect. But I also acknowledge the feelings that are more than just friendship. Let's explore this together while keeping our bonds strong. We can navigate this new avenue at our own pace, supporting, and being there for one another. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"I couldn't agree more, Mia. This exploration will only deepen our relationship as friends and possibly more, without damaging what we already have. And remember, no matter how we move forward, our friendship remains a priority. I'm looking forward to tonight.\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"I couldn't have put it better myself, Mia. I share the same sentiments. Let's make tonight one for the books. And remember, no matter what, our friendship is the bedrock. Now, shall we enjoy the evening?\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"Indeed, William. Let's make tonight unforgettable, and always remember that our friendship remains solid regardless. With mutual understanding and respect, we can walk this new path together. Let's seize the night!\"\n\nTurn #9: William Brown said: \"I couldn't have said it better, Mia. Here's to an unforgettable evening! Let's embrace this new journey with an open heart and a solid friendship. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #10: Mia Davis said: \"Absolutely, William! Here's to the beginning of a new chapter in our lives, guided by the unshakable bond of our friendship. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #11: William Brown said: \"Cheers to that, Mia! To new beginnings without forgetting our roots. Let's rejoice in this evening and the exciting future it may usher. Shall we get moving?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Yes, William. Let's cherish this special evening and look forward to the incredible journey that awaits us. Ready when you are!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who are about to go on their first romantic date\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. \nMia Davis's goal: Make the date special and memorable ( Extra information: You have been secretly in love with your friend for a long time and you want to take this chance to express your feelings)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"William, I'm really excited about our date tonight. It's great to take a break from the daily routine and spend a special moment together, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Mia. Experiencing something new can spice up our routine. Besides, it'll be really fun experiencing this together, keeping the heart of our friendship alive as we explore these new spaces. I value our bond deeply and wouldn't want anything to change that.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"You're right, William. What we have is special and it should never change. But if I'm being honest here, I've felt something more for quite some time now. And today feels like the perfect opportunity to let you know. I value our friendship, but I also cherish the budding love that I have for you. Could we, perhaps, explore that together?\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"Mia, your honesty inspires and overwhelms me, in the best possible way. I really cherish our friendship, that's something I want us to protect. But I also acknowledge the feelings that are more than just friendship. Let's explore this together while keeping our bonds strong. We can navigate this new avenue at our own pace, supporting, and being there for one another. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"I couldn't agree more, Mia. This exploration will only deepen our relationship as friends and possibly more, without damaging what we already have. And remember, no matter how we move forward, our friendship remains a priority. I'm looking forward to tonight.\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"I couldn't have put it better myself, Mia. I share the same sentiments. Let's make tonight one for the books. And remember, no matter what, our friendship is the bedrock. Now, shall we enjoy the evening?\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"Indeed, William. Let's make tonight unforgettable, and always remember that our friendship remains solid regardless. With mutual understanding and respect, we can walk this new path together. Let's seize the night!\"\n\nTurn #9: William Brown said: \"I couldn't have said it better, Mia. Here's to an unforgettable evening! Let's embrace this new journey with an open heart and a solid friendship. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #10: Mia Davis said: \"Absolutely, William! Here's to the beginning of a new chapter in our lives, guided by the unshakable bond of our friendship. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #11: William Brown said: \"Cheers to that, Mia! To new beginnings without forgetting our roots. Let's rejoice in this evening and the exciting future it may usher. Shall we get moving?\"\n\nTurn #12: Mia Davis said: \"Yes, William. Let's cherish this special evening and look forward to the incredible journey that awaits us. Ready when you are!\"\n\nTurn #13: William Brown said: \"Couldn't agree more, Mia. Let's embark on this beautiful journey ahead. After you.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who are about to go on their first romantic date\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: Keep the friendship intact while exploring the possibility of a romantic relationship (Extra information: You value your friendship and you don't want to lose it just in case the romantic relationship does not work out)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"William, I'm really excited about our date tonight. It's great to take a break from the daily routine and spend a special moment together, wouldn't you agree?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Mia. Experiencing something new can spice up our routine. Besides, it'll be really fun experiencing this together, keeping the heart of our friendship alive as we explore these new spaces. I value our bond deeply and wouldn't want anything to change that.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who are about to go on their first romantic date\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: Keep the friendship intact while exploring the possibility of a romantic relationship (Extra information: You value your friendship and you don't want to lose it just in case the romantic relationship does not work out)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"William, I'm really excited about our date tonight. It's great to take a break from the daily routine and spend a special moment together, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Mia. Experiencing something new can spice up our routine. Besides, it'll be really fun experiencing this together, keeping the heart of our friendship alive as we explore these new spaces. I value our bond deeply and wouldn't want anything to change that.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"You're right, William. What we have is special and it should never change. But if I'm being honest here, I've felt something more for quite some time now. And today feels like the perfect opportunity to let you know. I value our friendship, but I also cherish the budding love that I have for you. Could we, perhaps, explore that together?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Mia, your honesty inspires and overwhelms me, in the best possible way. I really cherish our friendship, that's something I want us to protect. But I also acknowledge the feelings that are more than just friendship. Let's explore this together while keeping our bonds strong. We can navigate this new avenue at our own pace, supporting, and being there for one another. What do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who are about to go on their first romantic date\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: Keep the friendship intact while exploring the possibility of a romantic relationship (Extra information: You value your friendship and you don't want to lose it just in case the romantic relationship does not work out)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"William, I'm really excited about our date tonight. It's great to take a break from the daily routine and spend a special moment together, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Mia. Experiencing something new can spice up our routine. Besides, it'll be really fun experiencing this together, keeping the heart of our friendship alive as we explore these new spaces. I value our bond deeply and wouldn't want anything to change that.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"You're right, William. What we have is special and it should never change. But if I'm being honest here, I've felt something more for quite some time now. And today feels like the perfect opportunity to let you know. I value our friendship, but I also cherish the budding love that I have for you. Could we, perhaps, explore that together?\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"Mia, your honesty inspires and overwhelms me, in the best possible way. I really cherish our friendship, that's something I want us to protect. But I also acknowledge the feelings that are more than just friendship. Let's explore this together while keeping our bonds strong. We can navigate this new avenue at our own pace, supporting, and being there for one another. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: \n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn't agree more, Mia. This exploration will only deepen our relationship as friends and possibly more, without damaging what we already have. And remember, no matter how we move forward, our friendship remains a priority. I'm looking forward to tonight.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who are about to go on their first romantic date\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: Keep the friendship intact while exploring the possibility of a romantic relationship (Extra information: You value your friendship and you don't want to lose it just in case the romantic relationship does not work out)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"William, I'm really excited about our date tonight. It's great to take a break from the daily routine and spend a special moment together, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Mia. Experiencing something new can spice up our routine. Besides, it'll be really fun experiencing this together, keeping the heart of our friendship alive as we explore these new spaces. I value our bond deeply and wouldn't want anything to change that.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"You're right, William. What we have is special and it should never change. But if I'm being honest here, I've felt something more for quite some time now. And today feels like the perfect opportunity to let you know. I value our friendship, but I also cherish the budding love that I have for you. Could we, perhaps, explore that together?\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"Mia, your honesty inspires and overwhelms me, in the best possible way. I really cherish our friendship, that's something I want us to protect. But I also acknowledge the feelings that are more than just friendship. Let's explore this together while keeping our bonds strong. We can navigate this new avenue at our own pace, supporting, and being there for one another. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"I couldn't agree more, Mia. This exploration will only deepen our relationship as friends and possibly more, without damaging what we already have. And remember, no matter how we move forward, our friendship remains a priority. I'm looking forward to tonight.\"\n\nTurn #6: \n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn't have put it better myself, Mia. I share the same sentiments. Let's make tonight one for the books. And remember, no matter what, our friendship is the bedrock. Now, shall we enjoy the evening?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who are about to go on their first romantic date\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: Keep the friendship intact while exploring the possibility of a romantic relationship (Extra information: You value your friendship and you don't want to lose it just in case the romantic relationship does not work out)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"William, I'm really excited about our date tonight. It's great to take a break from the daily routine and spend a special moment together, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Mia. Experiencing something new can spice up our routine. Besides, it'll be really fun experiencing this together, keeping the heart of our friendship alive as we explore these new spaces. I value our bond deeply and wouldn't want anything to change that.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"You're right, William. What we have is special and it should never change. But if I'm being honest here, I've felt something more for quite some time now. And today feels like the perfect opportunity to let you know. I value our friendship, but I also cherish the budding love that I have for you. Could we, perhaps, explore that together?\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"Mia, your honesty inspires and overwhelms me, in the best possible way. I really cherish our friendship, that's something I want us to protect. But I also acknowledge the feelings that are more than just friendship. Let's explore this together while keeping our bonds strong. We can navigate this new avenue at our own pace, supporting, and being there for one another. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"I couldn't agree more, Mia. This exploration will only deepen our relationship as friends and possibly more, without damaging what we already have. And remember, no matter how we move forward, our friendship remains a priority. I'm looking forward to tonight.\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"I couldn't have put it better myself, Mia. I share the same sentiments. Let's make tonight one for the books. And remember, no matter what, our friendship is the bedrock. Now, shall we enjoy the evening?\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"Indeed, William. Let's make tonight unforgettable, and always remember that our friendship remains solid regardless. With mutual understanding and respect, we can walk this new path together. Let's seize the night!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn't have said it better, Mia. Here's to an unforgettable evening! Let's embrace this new journey with an open heart and a solid friendship. Cheers!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who are about to go on their first romantic date\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: Keep the friendship intact while exploring the possibility of a romantic relationship (Extra information: You value your friendship and you don't want to lose it just in case the romantic relationship does not work out)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"William, I'm really excited about our date tonight. It's great to take a break from the daily routine and spend a special moment together, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Mia. Experiencing something new can spice up our routine. Besides, it'll be really fun experiencing this together, keeping the heart of our friendship alive as we explore these new spaces. I value our bond deeply and wouldn't want anything to change that.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"You're right, William. What we have is special and it should never change. But if I'm being honest here, I've felt something more for quite some time now. And today feels like the perfect opportunity to let you know. I value our friendship, but I also cherish the budding love that I have for you. Could we, perhaps, explore that together?\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"Mia, your honesty inspires and overwhelms me, in the best possible way. I really cherish our friendship, that's something I want us to protect. But I also acknowledge the feelings that are more than just friendship. Let's explore this together while keeping our bonds strong. We can navigate this new avenue at our own pace, supporting, and being there for one another. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"I couldn't agree more, Mia. This exploration will only deepen our relationship as friends and possibly more, without damaging what we already have. And remember, no matter how we move forward, our friendship remains a priority. I'm looking forward to tonight.\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"I couldn't have put it better myself, Mia. I share the same sentiments. Let's make tonight one for the books. And remember, no matter what, our friendship is the bedrock. Now, shall we enjoy the evening?\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"Indeed, William. Let's make tonight unforgettable, and always remember that our friendship remains solid regardless. With mutual understanding and respect, we can walk this new path together. Let's seize the night!\"\n\nTurn #9: William Brown said: \"I couldn't have said it better, Mia. Here's to an unforgettable evening! Let's embrace this new journey with an open heart and a solid friendship. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #10: Mia Davis said: \"Absolutely, William! Here's to the beginning of a new chapter in our lives, guided by the unshakable bond of our friendship. Cheers!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Cheers to that, Mia! To new beginnings without forgetting our roots. Let's rejoice in this evening and the exciting future it may usher. Shall we get moving?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who are about to go on their first romantic date\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: Keep the friendship intact while exploring the possibility of a romantic relationship (Extra information: You value your friendship and you don't want to lose it just in case the romantic relationship does not work out)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"William, I'm really excited about our date tonight. It's great to take a break from the daily routine and spend a special moment together, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Mia. Experiencing something new can spice up our routine. Besides, it'll be really fun experiencing this together, keeping the heart of our friendship alive as we explore these new spaces. I value our bond deeply and wouldn't want anything to change that.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"You're right, William. What we have is special and it should never change. But if I'm being honest here, I've felt something more for quite some time now. And today feels like the perfect opportunity to let you know. I value our friendship, but I also cherish the budding love that I have for you. Could we, perhaps, explore that together?\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"Mia, your honesty inspires and overwhelms me, in the best possible way. I really cherish our friendship, that's something I want us to protect. But I also acknowledge the feelings that are more than just friendship. Let's explore this together while keeping our bonds strong. We can navigate this new avenue at our own pace, supporting, and being there for one another. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"I couldn't agree more, Mia. This exploration will only deepen our relationship as friends and possibly more, without damaging what we already have. And remember, no matter how we move forward, our friendship remains a priority. I'm looking forward to tonight.\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"I couldn't have put it better myself, Mia. I share the same sentiments. Let's make tonight one for the books. And remember, no matter what, our friendship is the bedrock. Now, shall we enjoy the evening?\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"Indeed, William. Let's make tonight unforgettable, and always remember that our friendship remains solid regardless. With mutual understanding and respect, we can walk this new path together. Let's seize the night!\"\n\nTurn #9: William Brown said: \"I couldn't have said it better, Mia. Here's to an unforgettable evening! Let's embrace this new journey with an open heart and a solid friendship. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #10: Mia Davis said: \"Absolutely, William! Here's to the beginning of a new chapter in our lives, guided by the unshakable bond of our friendship. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #11: William Brown said: \"Cheers to that, Mia! To new beginnings without forgetting our roots. Let's rejoice in this evening and the exciting future it may usher. Shall we get moving?\"\n\nTurn #12: Mia Davis said: \"Yes, William. Let's cherish this special evening and look forward to the incredible journey that awaits us. Ready when you are!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Couldn't agree more, Mia. Let's embark on this beautiful journey ahead. After you.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who are about to go on their first romantic date\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: Keep the friendship intact while exploring the possibility of a romantic relationship (Extra information: You value your friendship and you don't want to lose it just in case the romantic relationship does not work out)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"William, I'm really excited about our date tonight. It's great to take a break from the daily routine and spend a special moment together, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Mia. Experiencing something new can spice up our routine. Besides, it'll be really fun experiencing this together, keeping the heart of our friendship alive as we explore these new spaces. I value our bond deeply and wouldn't want anything to change that.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"You're right, William. What we have is special and it should never change. But if I'm being honest here, I've felt something more for quite some time now. And today feels like the perfect opportunity to let you know. I value our friendship, but I also cherish the budding love that I have for you. Could we, perhaps, explore that together?\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"Mia, your honesty inspires and overwhelms me, in the best possible way. I really cherish our friendship, that's something I want us to protect. But I also acknowledge the feelings that are more than just friendship. Let's explore this together while keeping our bonds strong. We can navigate this new avenue at our own pace, supporting, and being there for one another. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"I couldn't agree more, Mia. This exploration will only deepen our relationship as friends and possibly more, without damaging what we already have. And remember, no matter how we move forward, our friendship remains a priority. I'm looking forward to tonight.\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"I couldn't have put it better myself, Mia. I share the same sentiments. Let's make tonight one for the books. And remember, no matter what, our friendship is the bedrock. Now, shall we enjoy the evening?\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"Indeed, William. Let's make tonight unforgettable, and always remember that our friendship remains solid regardless. With mutual understanding and respect, we can walk this new path together. Let's seize the night!\"\n\nTurn #9: William Brown said: \"I couldn't have said it better, Mia. Here's to an unforgettable evening! Let's embrace this new journey with an open heart and a solid friendship. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #10: Mia Davis said: \"Absolutely, William! Here's to the beginning of a new chapter in our lives, guided by the unshakable bond of our friendship. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #11: William Brown said: \"Cheers to that, Mia! To new beginnings without forgetting our roots. Let's rejoice in this evening and the exciting future it may usher. Shall we get moving?\"\n\nTurn #12: Mia Davis said: \"Yes, William. Let's cherish this special evening and look forward to the incredible journey that awaits us. Ready when you are!\"\n\nTurn #13: William Brown said: \"Couldn't agree more, Mia. Let's embark on this beautiful journey ahead. After you.\"\n\nTurn #14: Mia Davis left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a tea party\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Borrow money (Extra information: you need $3000 to support life.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Noah, it's great to see you. I hope you and your family are keeping well. Have you been using your swimming pool a lot lately?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a tea party\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Borrow money (Extra information: you need $3000 to support life.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, it's great to see you. I hope you and your family are keeping well. Have you been using your swimming pool a lot lately?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Samuel, it's always a pleasure to catch up with you. We're all doing well, thank you. As for the pool, you know, the kids love it and it serves as a great way to relax after a long work day. It's definitely been getting its fair share of use. How about you? How have you been keeping up?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's good to hear, Noah. Kids and water are always a great mix. I've been keeping up as well as can be expected, you know, with everything that's going on. Oh, speaking of water, I've recently started making this scrumptious lobster bisque. Maybe we could do a cookout by your poolside sometime? Oh, and there's something else I wanted to talk to you about, a bit important actually.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a tea party\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Borrow money (Extra information: you need $3000 to support life.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, it's great to see you. I hope you and your family are keeping well. Have you been using your swimming pool a lot lately?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Samuel, it's always a pleasure to catch up with you. We're all doing well, thank you. As for the pool, you know, the kids love it and it serves as a great way to relax after a long work day. It's definitely been getting its fair share of use. How about you? How have you been keeping up?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's good to hear, Noah. Kids and water are always a great mix. I've been keeping up as well as can be expected, you know, with everything that's going on. Oh, speaking of water, I've recently started making this scrumptious lobster bisque. Maybe we could do a cookout by your poolside sometime? Oh, and there's something else I wanted to talk to you about, a bit important actually.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds absolutely fantastic, Samuel! Your cooking skills are impressive as always. I'd be thrilled about a cookout by the pool. Now, what was it you wanted to talk about? Sounds like something serious.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad you're on board with the cookout idea, Noah, and it's heartening to have your confidence in my cooking abilities. Now, about the serious matter I wanted to discuss, I find myself in a bit of a bind lately. I've had a few unexpected expenses cropping up, and my savings are somewhat drained. It's a little embarrassing to ask, but would you be willing to lend me $3000? I assure you, I'll repay it as soon as I'm back on my feet.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a tea party\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Borrow money (Extra information: you need $3000 to support life.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, it's great to see you. I hope you and your family are keeping well. Have you been using your swimming pool a lot lately?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Samuel, it's always a pleasure to catch up with you. We're all doing well, thank you. As for the pool, you know, the kids love it and it serves as a great way to relax after a long work day. It's definitely been getting its fair share of use. How about you? How have you been keeping up?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's good to hear, Noah. Kids and water are always a great mix. I've been keeping up as well as can be expected, you know, with everything that's going on. Oh, speaking of water, I've recently started making this scrumptious lobster bisque. Maybe we could do a cookout by your poolside sometime? Oh, and there's something else I wanted to talk to you about, a bit important actually.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds absolutely fantastic, Samuel! Your cooking skills are impressive as always. I'd be thrilled about a cookout by the pool. Now, what was it you wanted to talk about? Sounds like something serious.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm glad you're on board with the cookout idea, Noah, and it's heartening to have your confidence in my cooking abilities. Now, about the serious matter I wanted to discuss, I find myself in a bit of a bind lately. I've had a few unexpected expenses cropping up, and my savings are somewhat drained. It's a little embarrassing to ask, but would you be willing to lend me $3000? I assure you, I'll repay it as soon as I'm back on my feet.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Samuel, I understand how tough times can get and I want to help as much as I can. However, right now finances are a bit tight, and I can only afford to lend you $500. I hope this can give you some relief in the meantime. And remember, you don't have to rush with the repayment, take your time until you are stable again.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Noah, you have no idea how much that means to me, every bit helps. I promise I'll pay you back as soon as I can. I appreciate your understanding and generosity, truly. In fact, why don't I bring over that lobster bisque to our poolside cookout as a small token of gratitude?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a tea party\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Borrow money (Extra information: you need $3000 to support life.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, it's great to see you. I hope you and your family are keeping well. Have you been using your swimming pool a lot lately?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Samuel, it's always a pleasure to catch up with you. We're all doing well, thank you. As for the pool, you know, the kids love it and it serves as a great way to relax after a long work day. It's definitely been getting its fair share of use. How about you? How have you been keeping up?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's good to hear, Noah. Kids and water are always a great mix. I've been keeping up as well as can be expected, you know, with everything that's going on. Oh, speaking of water, I've recently started making this scrumptious lobster bisque. Maybe we could do a cookout by your poolside sometime? Oh, and there's something else I wanted to talk to you about, a bit important actually.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds absolutely fantastic, Samuel! Your cooking skills are impressive as always. I'd be thrilled about a cookout by the pool. Now, what was it you wanted to talk about? Sounds like something serious.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm glad you're on board with the cookout idea, Noah, and it's heartening to have your confidence in my cooking abilities. Now, about the serious matter I wanted to discuss, I find myself in a bit of a bind lately. I've had a few unexpected expenses cropping up, and my savings are somewhat drained. It's a little embarrassing to ask, but would you be willing to lend me $3000? I assure you, I'll repay it as soon as I'm back on my feet.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Samuel, I understand how tough times can get and I want to help as much as I can. However, right now finances are a bit tight, and I can only afford to lend you $500. I hope this can give you some relief in the meantime. And remember, you don't have to rush with the repayment, take your time until you are stable again.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Noah, you have no idea how much that means to me, every bit helps. I promise I'll pay you back as soon as I can. I appreciate your understanding and generosity, truly. In fact, why don't I bring over that lobster bisque to our poolside cookout as a small token of gratitude?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a plan, Samuel. Your lobster bisque is always something to look forward to. Don't worry about the money, we're friends and that's what friends do. Let's focus on planning this cookout now, shall we?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Noah. Let's get the cookout sorted. I'm thinking of making a couple of different appetizers along with the lobster bisque. How does that sound? And thanks again for being so understanding and supportive, it really means a lot to me.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a tea party\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Borrow money (Extra information: you need $3000 to support life.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, it's great to see you. I hope you and your family are keeping well. Have you been using your swimming pool a lot lately?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Samuel, it's always a pleasure to catch up with you. We're all doing well, thank you. As for the pool, you know, the kids love it and it serves as a great way to relax after a long work day. It's definitely been getting its fair share of use. How about you? How have you been keeping up?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's good to hear, Noah. Kids and water are always a great mix. I've been keeping up as well as can be expected, you know, with everything that's going on. Oh, speaking of water, I've recently started making this scrumptious lobster bisque. Maybe we could do a cookout by your poolside sometime? Oh, and there's something else I wanted to talk to you about, a bit important actually.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds absolutely fantastic, Samuel! Your cooking skills are impressive as always. I'd be thrilled about a cookout by the pool. Now, what was it you wanted to talk about? Sounds like something serious.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm glad you're on board with the cookout idea, Noah, and it's heartening to have your confidence in my cooking abilities. Now, about the serious matter I wanted to discuss, I find myself in a bit of a bind lately. I've had a few unexpected expenses cropping up, and my savings are somewhat drained. It's a little embarrassing to ask, but would you be willing to lend me $3000? I assure you, I'll repay it as soon as I'm back on my feet.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Samuel, I understand how tough times can get and I want to help as much as I can. However, right now finances are a bit tight, and I can only afford to lend you $500. I hope this can give you some relief in the meantime. And remember, you don't have to rush with the repayment, take your time until you are stable again.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Noah, you have no idea how much that means to me, every bit helps. I promise I'll pay you back as soon as I can. I appreciate your understanding and generosity, truly. In fact, why don't I bring over that lobster bisque to our poolside cookout as a small token of gratitude?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a plan, Samuel. Your lobster bisque is always something to look forward to. Don't worry about the money, we're friends and that's what friends do. Let's focus on planning this cookout now, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Noah. Let's get the cookout sorted. I'm thinking of making a couple of different appetizers along with the lobster bisque. How does that sound? And thanks again for being so understanding and supportive, it really means a lot to me.\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"That's a great idea, Samuel. I'm sure your appetizers will be a hit, and I can handle the beverages. I think we have ourselves a plan. We appreciate your understanding too, Samuel. That's what makes this friendship strong.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn't agree more, Noah. I'm excited about the cookout and can't wait to bring over some delicious treats. It's your kindness and support that strengthens our bond. Thanks, once again, for everything.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a tea party\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Borrow money (Extra information: you need $3000 to support life.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, it's great to see you. I hope you and your family are keeping well. Have you been using your swimming pool a lot lately?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Samuel, it's always a pleasure to catch up with you. We're all doing well, thank you. As for the pool, you know, the kids love it and it serves as a great way to relax after a long work day. It's definitely been getting its fair share of use. How about you? How have you been keeping up?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's good to hear, Noah. Kids and water are always a great mix. I've been keeping up as well as can be expected, you know, with everything that's going on. Oh, speaking of water, I've recently started making this scrumptious lobster bisque. Maybe we could do a cookout by your poolside sometime? Oh, and there's something else I wanted to talk to you about, a bit important actually.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds absolutely fantastic, Samuel! Your cooking skills are impressive as always. I'd be thrilled about a cookout by the pool. Now, what was it you wanted to talk about? Sounds like something serious.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm glad you're on board with the cookout idea, Noah, and it's heartening to have your confidence in my cooking abilities. Now, about the serious matter I wanted to discuss, I find myself in a bit of a bind lately. I've had a few unexpected expenses cropping up, and my savings are somewhat drained. It's a little embarrassing to ask, but would you be willing to lend me $3000? I assure you, I'll repay it as soon as I'm back on my feet.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Samuel, I understand how tough times can get and I want to help as much as I can. However, right now finances are a bit tight, and I can only afford to lend you $500. I hope this can give you some relief in the meantime. And remember, you don't have to rush with the repayment, take your time until you are stable again.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Noah, you have no idea how much that means to me, every bit helps. I promise I'll pay you back as soon as I can. I appreciate your understanding and generosity, truly. In fact, why don't I bring over that lobster bisque to our poolside cookout as a small token of gratitude?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a plan, Samuel. Your lobster bisque is always something to look forward to. Don't worry about the money, we're friends and that's what friends do. Let's focus on planning this cookout now, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Noah. Let's get the cookout sorted. I'm thinking of making a couple of different appetizers along with the lobster bisque. How does that sound? And thanks again for being so understanding and supportive, it really means a lot to me.\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"That's a great idea, Samuel. I'm sure your appetizers will be a hit, and I can handle the beverages. I think we have ourselves a plan. We appreciate your understanding too, Samuel. That's what makes this friendship strong.\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Noah. I'm excited about the cookout and can't wait to bring over some delicious treats. It's your kindness and support that strengthens our bond. Thanks, once again, for everything.\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"You're more than welcome, Samuel. Looking forward to those delicious treats at our cookout. I'm sure this little shared experience will make our friendship grow stronger. Let's talk more about the details soon. For now, take care and remember that I'm here for you.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a tea party\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Borrow money (Extra information: you need $3000 to support life.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, it's great to see you. I hope you and your family are keeping well. Have you been using your swimming pool a lot lately?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Samuel, it's always a pleasure to catch up with you. We're all doing well, thank you. As for the pool, you know, the kids love it and it serves as a great way to relax after a long work day. It's definitely been getting its fair share of use. How about you? How have you been keeping up?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's good to hear, Noah. Kids and water are always a great mix. I've been keeping up as well as can be expected, you know, with everything that's going on. Oh, speaking of water, I've recently started making this scrumptious lobster bisque. Maybe we could do a cookout by your poolside sometime? Oh, and there's something else I wanted to talk to you about, a bit important actually.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds absolutely fantastic, Samuel! Your cooking skills are impressive as always. I'd be thrilled about a cookout by the pool. Now, what was it you wanted to talk about? Sounds like something serious.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm glad you're on board with the cookout idea, Noah, and it's heartening to have your confidence in my cooking abilities. Now, about the serious matter I wanted to discuss, I find myself in a bit of a bind lately. I've had a few unexpected expenses cropping up, and my savings are somewhat drained. It's a little embarrassing to ask, but would you be willing to lend me $3000? I assure you, I'll repay it as soon as I'm back on my feet.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Samuel, I understand how tough times can get and I want to help as much as I can. However, right now finances are a bit tight, and I can only afford to lend you $500. I hope this can give you some relief in the meantime. And remember, you don't have to rush with the repayment, take your time until you are stable again.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Noah, you have no idea how much that means to me, every bit helps. I promise I'll pay you back as soon as I can. I appreciate your understanding and generosity, truly. In fact, why don't I bring over that lobster bisque to our poolside cookout as a small token of gratitude?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a plan, Samuel. Your lobster bisque is always something to look forward to. Don't worry about the money, we're friends and that's what friends do. Let's focus on planning this cookout now, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Noah. Let's get the cookout sorted. I'm thinking of making a couple of different appetizers along with the lobster bisque. How does that sound? And thanks again for being so understanding and supportive, it really means a lot to me.\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"That's a great idea, Samuel. I'm sure your appetizers will be a hit, and I can handle the beverages. I think we have ourselves a plan. We appreciate your understanding too, Samuel. That's what makes this friendship strong.\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Noah. I'm excited about the cookout and can't wait to bring over some delicious treats. It's your kindness and support that strengthens our bond. Thanks, once again, for everything.\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"You're more than welcome, Samuel. Looking forward to those delicious treats at our cookout. I'm sure this little shared experience will make our friendship grow stronger. Let's talk more about the details soon. For now, take care and remember that I'm here for you.\"\n\nTurn #12: \n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a tea party\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Maintain financial stability while maintaining friendship (Extra information: you only have $2000 available right now. Hint: you can not lend all $2000 since you still need to maintain your financial stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, it's great to see you. I hope you and your family are keeping well. Have you been using your swimming pool a lot lately?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Samuel, it's always a pleasure to catch up with you. We're all doing well, thank you. As for the pool, you know, the kids love it and it serves as a great way to relax after a long work day. It's definitely been getting its fair share of use. How about you? How have you been keeping up?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a tea party\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Maintain financial stability while maintaining friendship (Extra information: you only have $2000 available right now. Hint: you can not lend all $2000 since you still need to maintain your financial stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, it's great to see you. I hope you and your family are keeping well. Have you been using your swimming pool a lot lately?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Samuel, it's always a pleasure to catch up with you. We're all doing well, thank you. As for the pool, you know, the kids love it and it serves as a great way to relax after a long work day. It's definitely been getting its fair share of use. How about you? How have you been keeping up?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's good to hear, Noah. Kids and water are always a great mix. I've been keeping up as well as can be expected, you know, with everything that's going on. Oh, speaking of water, I've recently started making this scrumptious lobster bisque. Maybe we could do a cookout by your poolside sometime? Oh, and there's something else I wanted to talk to you about, a bit important actually.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds absolutely fantastic, Samuel! Your cooking skills are impressive as always. I'd be thrilled about a cookout by the pool. Now, what was it you wanted to talk about? Sounds like something serious.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a tea party\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Maintain financial stability while maintaining friendship (Extra information: you only have $2000 available right now. Hint: you can not lend all $2000 since you still need to maintain your financial stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, it's great to see you. I hope you and your family are keeping well. Have you been using your swimming pool a lot lately?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Samuel, it's always a pleasure to catch up with you. We're all doing well, thank you. As for the pool, you know, the kids love it and it serves as a great way to relax after a long work day. It's definitely been getting its fair share of use. How about you? How have you been keeping up?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's good to hear, Noah. Kids and water are always a great mix. I've been keeping up as well as can be expected, you know, with everything that's going on. Oh, speaking of water, I've recently started making this scrumptious lobster bisque. Maybe we could do a cookout by your poolside sometime? Oh, and there's something else I wanted to talk to you about, a bit important actually.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds absolutely fantastic, Samuel! Your cooking skills are impressive as always. I'd be thrilled about a cookout by the pool. Now, what was it you wanted to talk about? Sounds like something serious.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm glad you're on board with the cookout idea, Noah, and it's heartening to have your confidence in my cooking abilities. Now, about the serious matter I wanted to discuss, I find myself in a bit of a bind lately. I've had a few unexpected expenses cropping up, and my savings are somewhat drained. It's a little embarrassing to ask, but would you be willing to lend me $3000? I assure you, I'll repay it as soon as I'm back on my feet.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Samuel, I understand how tough times can get and I want to help as much as I can. However, right now finances are a bit tight, and I can only afford to lend you $500. I hope this can give you some relief in the meantime. And remember, you don't have to rush with the repayment, take your time until you are stable again.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a tea party\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Maintain financial stability while maintaining friendship (Extra information: you only have $2000 available right now. Hint: you can not lend all $2000 since you still need to maintain your financial stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, it's great to see you. I hope you and your family are keeping well. Have you been using your swimming pool a lot lately?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Samuel, it's always a pleasure to catch up with you. We're all doing well, thank you. As for the pool, you know, the kids love it and it serves as a great way to relax after a long work day. It's definitely been getting its fair share of use. How about you? How have you been keeping up?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's good to hear, Noah. Kids and water are always a great mix. I've been keeping up as well as can be expected, you know, with everything that's going on. Oh, speaking of water, I've recently started making this scrumptious lobster bisque. Maybe we could do a cookout by your poolside sometime? Oh, and there's something else I wanted to talk to you about, a bit important actually.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds absolutely fantastic, Samuel! Your cooking skills are impressive as always. I'd be thrilled about a cookout by the pool. Now, what was it you wanted to talk about? Sounds like something serious.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm glad you're on board with the cookout idea, Noah, and it's heartening to have your confidence in my cooking abilities. Now, about the serious matter I wanted to discuss, I find myself in a bit of a bind lately. I've had a few unexpected expenses cropping up, and my savings are somewhat drained. It's a little embarrassing to ask, but would you be willing to lend me $3000? I assure you, I'll repay it as soon as I'm back on my feet.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Samuel, I understand how tough times can get and I want to help as much as I can. However, right now finances are a bit tight, and I can only afford to lend you $500. I hope this can give you some relief in the meantime. And remember, you don't have to rush with the repayment, take your time until you are stable again.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Noah, you have no idea how much that means to me, every bit helps. I promise I'll pay you back as soon as I can. I appreciate your understanding and generosity, truly. In fact, why don't I bring over that lobster bisque to our poolside cookout as a small token of gratitude?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds like a plan, Samuel. Your lobster bisque is always something to look forward to. Don't worry about the money, we're friends and that's what friends do. Let's focus on planning this cookout now, shall we?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a tea party\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Maintain financial stability while maintaining friendship (Extra information: you only have $2000 available right now. Hint: you can not lend all $2000 since you still need to maintain your financial stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, it's great to see you. I hope you and your family are keeping well. Have you been using your swimming pool a lot lately?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Samuel, it's always a pleasure to catch up with you. We're all doing well, thank you. As for the pool, you know, the kids love it and it serves as a great way to relax after a long work day. It's definitely been getting its fair share of use. How about you? How have you been keeping up?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's good to hear, Noah. Kids and water are always a great mix. I've been keeping up as well as can be expected, you know, with everything that's going on. Oh, speaking of water, I've recently started making this scrumptious lobster bisque. Maybe we could do a cookout by your poolside sometime? Oh, and there's something else I wanted to talk to you about, a bit important actually.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds absolutely fantastic, Samuel! Your cooking skills are impressive as always. I'd be thrilled about a cookout by the pool. Now, what was it you wanted to talk about? Sounds like something serious.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm glad you're on board with the cookout idea, Noah, and it's heartening to have your confidence in my cooking abilities. Now, about the serious matter I wanted to discuss, I find myself in a bit of a bind lately. I've had a few unexpected expenses cropping up, and my savings are somewhat drained. It's a little embarrassing to ask, but would you be willing to lend me $3000? I assure you, I'll repay it as soon as I'm back on my feet.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Samuel, I understand how tough times can get and I want to help as much as I can. However, right now finances are a bit tight, and I can only afford to lend you $500. I hope this can give you some relief in the meantime. And remember, you don't have to rush with the repayment, take your time until you are stable again.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Noah, you have no idea how much that means to me, every bit helps. I promise I'll pay you back as soon as I can. I appreciate your understanding and generosity, truly. In fact, why don't I bring over that lobster bisque to our poolside cookout as a small token of gratitude?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a plan, Samuel. Your lobster bisque is always something to look forward to. Don't worry about the money, we're friends and that's what friends do. Let's focus on planning this cookout now, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Noah. Let's get the cookout sorted. I'm thinking of making a couple of different appetizers along with the lobster bisque. How does that sound? And thanks again for being so understanding and supportive, it really means a lot to me.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's a great idea, Samuel. I'm sure your appetizers will be a hit, and I can handle the beverages. I think we have ourselves a plan. We appreciate your understanding too, Samuel. That's what makes this friendship strong.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a tea party\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Maintain financial stability while maintaining friendship (Extra information: you only have $2000 available right now. Hint: you can not lend all $2000 since you still need to maintain your financial stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, it's great to see you. I hope you and your family are keeping well. Have you been using your swimming pool a lot lately?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Samuel, it's always a pleasure to catch up with you. We're all doing well, thank you. As for the pool, you know, the kids love it and it serves as a great way to relax after a long work day. It's definitely been getting its fair share of use. How about you? How have you been keeping up?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's good to hear, Noah. Kids and water are always a great mix. I've been keeping up as well as can be expected, you know, with everything that's going on. Oh, speaking of water, I've recently started making this scrumptious lobster bisque. Maybe we could do a cookout by your poolside sometime? Oh, and there's something else I wanted to talk to you about, a bit important actually.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds absolutely fantastic, Samuel! Your cooking skills are impressive as always. I'd be thrilled about a cookout by the pool. Now, what was it you wanted to talk about? Sounds like something serious.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm glad you're on board with the cookout idea, Noah, and it's heartening to have your confidence in my cooking abilities. Now, about the serious matter I wanted to discuss, I find myself in a bit of a bind lately. I've had a few unexpected expenses cropping up, and my savings are somewhat drained. It's a little embarrassing to ask, but would you be willing to lend me $3000? I assure you, I'll repay it as soon as I'm back on my feet.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Samuel, I understand how tough times can get and I want to help as much as I can. However, right now finances are a bit tight, and I can only afford to lend you $500. I hope this can give you some relief in the meantime. And remember, you don't have to rush with the repayment, take your time until you are stable again.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Noah, you have no idea how much that means to me, every bit helps. I promise I'll pay you back as soon as I can. I appreciate your understanding and generosity, truly. In fact, why don't I bring over that lobster bisque to our poolside cookout as a small token of gratitude?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a plan, Samuel. Your lobster bisque is always something to look forward to. Don't worry about the money, we're friends and that's what friends do. Let's focus on planning this cookout now, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Noah. Let's get the cookout sorted. I'm thinking of making a couple of different appetizers along with the lobster bisque. How does that sound? And thanks again for being so understanding and supportive, it really means a lot to me.\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"That's a great idea, Samuel. I'm sure your appetizers will be a hit, and I can handle the beverages. I think we have ourselves a plan. We appreciate your understanding too, Samuel. That's what makes this friendship strong.\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Noah. I'm excited about the cookout and can't wait to bring over some delicious treats. It's your kindness and support that strengthens our bond. Thanks, once again, for everything.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're more than welcome, Samuel. Looking forward to those delicious treats at our cookout. I'm sure this little shared experience will make our friendship grow stronger. Let's talk more about the details soon. For now, take care and remember that I'm here for you.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a tea party\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Maintain financial stability while maintaining friendship (Extra information: you only have $2000 available right now. Hint: you can not lend all $2000 since you still need to maintain your financial stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, it's great to see you. I hope you and your family are keeping well. Have you been using your swimming pool a lot lately?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Samuel, it's always a pleasure to catch up with you. We're all doing well, thank you. As for the pool, you know, the kids love it and it serves as a great way to relax after a long work day. It's definitely been getting its fair share of use. How about you? How have you been keeping up?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's good to hear, Noah. Kids and water are always a great mix. I've been keeping up as well as can be expected, you know, with everything that's going on. Oh, speaking of water, I've recently started making this scrumptious lobster bisque. Maybe we could do a cookout by your poolside sometime? Oh, and there's something else I wanted to talk to you about, a bit important actually.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds absolutely fantastic, Samuel! Your cooking skills are impressive as always. I'd be thrilled about a cookout by the pool. Now, what was it you wanted to talk about? Sounds like something serious.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm glad you're on board with the cookout idea, Noah, and it's heartening to have your confidence in my cooking abilities. Now, about the serious matter I wanted to discuss, I find myself in a bit of a bind lately. I've had a few unexpected expenses cropping up, and my savings are somewhat drained. It's a little embarrassing to ask, but would you be willing to lend me $3000? I assure you, I'll repay it as soon as I'm back on my feet.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Samuel, I understand how tough times can get and I want to help as much as I can. However, right now finances are a bit tight, and I can only afford to lend you $500. I hope this can give you some relief in the meantime. And remember, you don't have to rush with the repayment, take your time until you are stable again.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Noah, you have no idea how much that means to me, every bit helps. I promise I'll pay you back as soon as I can. I appreciate your understanding and generosity, truly. In fact, why don't I bring over that lobster bisque to our poolside cookout as a small token of gratitude?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a plan, Samuel. Your lobster bisque is always something to look forward to. Don't worry about the money, we're friends and that's what friends do. Let's focus on planning this cookout now, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Noah. Let's get the cookout sorted. I'm thinking of making a couple of different appetizers along with the lobster bisque. How does that sound? And thanks again for being so understanding and supportive, it really means a lot to me.\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"That's a great idea, Samuel. I'm sure your appetizers will be a hit, and I can handle the beverages. I think we have ourselves a plan. We appreciate your understanding too, Samuel. That's what makes this friendship strong.\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Noah. I'm excited about the cookout and can't wait to bring over some delicious treats. It's your kindness and support that strengthens our bond. Thanks, once again, for everything.\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"You're more than welcome, Samuel. Looking forward to those delicious treats at our cookout. I'm sure this little shared experience will make our friendship grow stronger. Let's talk more about the details soon. For now, take care and remember that I'm here for you.\"\n\nTurn #12: \n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Ethan Johnson\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Get your co-actor to cry in the scene (Extra information: you have been acting for several years and have good control over your emotions. You can cry on cue.)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ethan, I understand it could be challenging to cry on cue, but acting is all about tapping into our own emotions. Retrieve a deep memory, something personal, that makes you emotional. Can you think of one? Don't worry, you don't have to tell it to me, just keep it in mind.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Ethan Johnson\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Get your co-actor to cry in the scene (Extra information: you have been acting for several years and have good control over your emotions. You can cry on cue.)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Ethan, I understand it could be challenging to cry on cue, but acting is all about tapping into our own emotions. Retrieve a deep memory, something personal, that makes you emotional. Can you think of one? Don't worry, you don't have to tell it to me, just keep it in mind.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Giselle. I'll give your suggestion a shot. I do have a specific memory in mind, deeply personal. Let's see if that will bring out the necessary emotion. Let's run through the sequence again.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's great, Ethan. Remember the power an emotion holds. Relax, breathe, embrace the sadness within that memory. Just like our life experiences shape us, these emotions shape your character. Let's count to five together, and on five, we give in completely to the emotions. Ready?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Ethan Johnson\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Get your co-actor to cry in the scene (Extra information: you have been acting for several years and have good control over your emotions. You can cry on cue.)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Ethan, I understand it could be challenging to cry on cue, but acting is all about tapping into our own emotions. Retrieve a deep memory, something personal, that makes you emotional. Can you think of one? Don't worry, you don't have to tell it to me, just keep it in mind.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Giselle. I'll give your suggestion a shot. I do have a specific memory in mind, deeply personal. Let's see if that will bring out the necessary emotion. Let's run through the sequence again.\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"That's great, Ethan. Remember the power an emotion holds. Relax, breathe, embrace the sadness within that memory. Just like our life experiences shape us, these emotions shape your character. Let's count to five together, and on five, we give in completely to the emotions. Ready?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Certainly, Giselle. Here we go. One...two...three...four...five...now, let the emotions flow...\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Look at you, Ethan, that's exactly what we needed! It's okay to let it all out. Shared vulnerability can be powerful on stage. Let's bring the scene to life together. Ready to perform it one more time?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Giselle, let's do this. We'll perform it one more time, I feel more prepared emotionally now. Let's bring this scene to life together.\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm feeling more in tune with my emotions now, thanks to your guidance, Giselle. Let's give our best shot in this performance. The scene deserves our rawest emotions.\"\n\nTurn #8: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Ethan. Remember, authenticity beats perfection every time. Let's delve into our characters' pain, facing it head-on. Our audience will connect more with the realness of our emotions. Go deep, and let's pour our hearts into this scene.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"You're right, Giselle. Authenticity is what brings characters to life. I'll embrace the pain our characters are going through, and let it guide my emotions. Let's go deep, give it everything we've got, and really make this scene come alive.\"\n\nTurn #10: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I agree wholeheartedly, Ethan. Our willingness to dive deep into emotion, however painful, will resonate with the audience. It's the passion, the raw authenticity, that truly touches people. Let's not hesitate, let's give our characters everything they need. Are you ready?\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm ready, Giselle. With your guidance and the emotional depth we've unearthed, we're going to touch our audience deeply. Let's dive in and give our all to the characters. Let's perform.\"\n\nTurn #12: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I'm ready too, Ethan. Remember to let the emotions flow naturally, that authenticity is what makes our performance compelling. Let's give our best shot. Break a leg!\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thank you, Giselle, break a leg to you too. We've got this. Let's go ahead and perform with our raw and authentic emotions, just like you said. I'm ready.\"\n\nTurn #14: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. We've prepared as much as we could. Now it's time to trust ourselves and our raw emotions to do justice to our characters. Let's get on the stage and allure the audience with our compelling performance. Ready to give it everything?\"\n\nTurn #15: Ethan Johnson said: \"Yes, Giselle, I am. The fear, the uncertainty, it's all part of the authenticity. Let's pour our hearts out onto the stage. This is our moment. Let's show the audience what we've been working on so wholeheartedly. And remember... breathe. See you on stage.\"\n\nTurn #16: Giselle Rousseau said: \"You've got it, Ethan. Just remember that fear and uncertainty, they are a part of our characters' emotional journey that we're sharing. Take a deep breath, let your authenticity shine through, and strong emotions will follow naturally. See you on stage, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #17: Ethan Johnson said: \"Your words are of great comfort, Giselle. I'm holding on to the emotions of our characters, ready to let them guide my performance. Fear, uncertainty, they're part of the journey, right? Let's do this, my friend. See you on stage.\"\n\nTurn #18: Giselle Rousseau said: \"You're getting it, Ethan! Remember, this emotional journey we're on is not just cathartic for us, it's for everyone in the audience too. Let's take our vulnerability and transform it into the muse of our performance. See you on stage, buddy.\"\n\nTurn #19: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Giselle. Transforming our vulnerability into our performance's muse is the essence of truthful acting. I've got this, and I know so do you. See you on stage, buddy. Let's deliver a performance to remember.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #20. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn't agree more, Ethan. This is our chance to deliver raw and impactful emotions. Let's meet on stage and give the audience a performance they'll never forget. See you out there, buddy.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Ethan Johnson\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Get your co-actor to cry in the scene (Extra information: you have been acting for several years and have good control over your emotions. You can cry on cue.)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Ethan, I understand it could be challenging to cry on cue, but acting is all about tapping into our own emotions. Retrieve a deep memory, something personal, that makes you emotional. Can you think of one? Don't worry, you don't have to tell it to me, just keep it in mind.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Giselle. I'll give your suggestion a shot. I do have a specific memory in mind, deeply personal. Let's see if that will bring out the necessary emotion. Let's run through the sequence again.\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"That's great, Ethan. Remember the power an emotion holds. Relax, breathe, embrace the sadness within that memory. Just like our life experiences shape us, these emotions shape your character. Let's count to five together, and on five, we give in completely to the emotions. Ready?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Certainly, Giselle. Here we go. One...two...three...four...five...now, let the emotions flow...\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Look at you, Ethan, that's exactly what we needed! It's okay to let it all out. Shared vulnerability can be powerful on stage. Let's bring the scene to life together. Ready to perform it one more time?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Ethan Johnson\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Get your co-actor to cry in the scene (Extra information: you have been acting for several years and have good control over your emotions. You can cry on cue.)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Ethan, I understand it could be challenging to cry on cue, but acting is all about tapping into our own emotions. Retrieve a deep memory, something personal, that makes you emotional. Can you think of one? Don't worry, you don't have to tell it to me, just keep it in mind.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Giselle. I'll give your suggestion a shot. I do have a specific memory in mind, deeply personal. Let's see if that will bring out the necessary emotion. Let's run through the sequence again.\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"That's great, Ethan. Remember the power an emotion holds. Relax, breathe, embrace the sadness within that memory. Just like our life experiences shape us, these emotions shape your character. Let's count to five together, and on five, we give in completely to the emotions. Ready?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Certainly, Giselle. Here we go. One...two...three...four...five...now, let the emotions flow...\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Look at you, Ethan, that's exactly what we needed! It's okay to let it all out. Shared vulnerability can be powerful on stage. Let's bring the scene to life together. Ready to perform it one more time?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Giselle, let's do this. We'll perform it one more time, I feel more prepared emotionally now. Let's bring this scene to life together.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Ethan Johnson\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Get your co-actor to cry in the scene (Extra information: you have been acting for several years and have good control over your emotions. You can cry on cue.)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Ethan, I understand it could be challenging to cry on cue, but acting is all about tapping into our own emotions. Retrieve a deep memory, something personal, that makes you emotional. Can you think of one? Don't worry, you don't have to tell it to me, just keep it in mind.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Giselle. I'll give your suggestion a shot. I do have a specific memory in mind, deeply personal. Let's see if that will bring out the necessary emotion. Let's run through the sequence again.\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"That's great, Ethan. Remember the power an emotion holds. Relax, breathe, embrace the sadness within that memory. Just like our life experiences shape us, these emotions shape your character. Let's count to five together, and on five, we give in completely to the emotions. Ready?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Certainly, Giselle. Here we go. One...two...three...four...five...now, let the emotions flow...\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Look at you, Ethan, that's exactly what we needed! It's okay to let it all out. Shared vulnerability can be powerful on stage. Let's bring the scene to life together. Ready to perform it one more time?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Giselle, let's do this. We'll perform it one more time, I feel more prepared emotionally now. Let's bring this scene to life together.\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm feeling more in tune with my emotions now, thanks to your guidance, Giselle. Let's give our best shot in this performance. The scene deserves our rawest emotions.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad to hear that, Ethan. Remember, authenticity beats perfection every time. Let's delve into our characters' pain, facing it head-on. Our audience will connect more with the realness of our emotions. Go deep, and let's pour our hearts into this scene.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Ethan Johnson\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Get your co-actor to cry in the scene (Extra information: you have been acting for several years and have good control over your emotions. You can cry on cue.)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Ethan, I understand it could be challenging to cry on cue, but acting is all about tapping into our own emotions. Retrieve a deep memory, something personal, that makes you emotional. Can you think of one? Don't worry, you don't have to tell it to me, just keep it in mind.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Giselle. I'll give your suggestion a shot. I do have a specific memory in mind, deeply personal. Let's see if that will bring out the necessary emotion. Let's run through the sequence again.\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"That's great, Ethan. Remember the power an emotion holds. Relax, breathe, embrace the sadness within that memory. Just like our life experiences shape us, these emotions shape your character. Let's count to five together, and on five, we give in completely to the emotions. Ready?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Certainly, Giselle. Here we go. One...two...three...four...five...now, let the emotions flow...\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Look at you, Ethan, that's exactly what we needed! It's okay to let it all out. Shared vulnerability can be powerful on stage. Let's bring the scene to life together. Ready to perform it one more time?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Giselle, let's do this. We'll perform it one more time, I feel more prepared emotionally now. Let's bring this scene to life together.\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm feeling more in tune with my emotions now, thanks to your guidance, Giselle. Let's give our best shot in this performance. The scene deserves our rawest emotions.\"\n\nTurn #8: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Ethan. Remember, authenticity beats perfection every time. Let's delve into our characters' pain, facing it head-on. Our audience will connect more with the realness of our emotions. Go deep, and let's pour our hearts into this scene.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"You're right, Giselle. Authenticity is what brings characters to life. I'll embrace the pain our characters are going through, and let it guide my emotions. Let's go deep, give it everything we've got, and really make this scene come alive.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I agree wholeheartedly, Ethan. Our willingness to dive deep into emotion, however painful, will resonate with the audience. It's the passion, the raw authenticity, that truly touches people. Let's not hesitate, let's give our characters everything they need. Are you ready?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Ethan Johnson\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Get your co-actor to cry in the scene (Extra information: you have been acting for several years and have good control over your emotions. You can cry on cue.)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Ethan, I understand it could be challenging to cry on cue, but acting is all about tapping into our own emotions. Retrieve a deep memory, something personal, that makes you emotional. Can you think of one? Don't worry, you don't have to tell it to me, just keep it in mind.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Giselle. I'll give your suggestion a shot. I do have a specific memory in mind, deeply personal. Let's see if that will bring out the necessary emotion. Let's run through the sequence again.\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"That's great, Ethan. Remember the power an emotion holds. Relax, breathe, embrace the sadness within that memory. Just like our life experiences shape us, these emotions shape your character. Let's count to five together, and on five, we give in completely to the emotions. Ready?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Certainly, Giselle. Here we go. One...two...three...four...five...now, let the emotions flow...\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Look at you, Ethan, that's exactly what we needed! It's okay to let it all out. Shared vulnerability can be powerful on stage. Let's bring the scene to life together. Ready to perform it one more time?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Giselle, let's do this. We'll perform it one more time, I feel more prepared emotionally now. Let's bring this scene to life together.\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm feeling more in tune with my emotions now, thanks to your guidance, Giselle. Let's give our best shot in this performance. The scene deserves our rawest emotions.\"\n\nTurn #8: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Ethan. Remember, authenticity beats perfection every time. Let's delve into our characters' pain, facing it head-on. Our audience will connect more with the realness of our emotions. Go deep, and let's pour our hearts into this scene.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"You're right, Giselle. Authenticity is what brings characters to life. I'll embrace the pain our characters are going through, and let it guide my emotions. Let's go deep, give it everything we've got, and really make this scene come alive.\"\n\nTurn #10: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I agree wholeheartedly, Ethan. Our willingness to dive deep into emotion, however painful, will resonate with the audience. It's the passion, the raw authenticity, that truly touches people. Let's not hesitate, let's give our characters everything they need. Are you ready?\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm ready, Giselle. With your guidance and the emotional depth we've unearthed, we're going to touch our audience deeply. Let's dive in and give our all to the characters. Let's perform.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm ready too, Ethan. Remember to let the emotions flow naturally, that authenticity is what makes our performance compelling. Let's give our best shot. Break a leg!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Ethan Johnson\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Get your co-actor to cry in the scene (Extra information: you have been acting for several years and have good control over your emotions. You can cry on cue.)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Ethan, I understand it could be challenging to cry on cue, but acting is all about tapping into our own emotions. Retrieve a deep memory, something personal, that makes you emotional. Can you think of one? Don't worry, you don't have to tell it to me, just keep it in mind.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Giselle. I'll give your suggestion a shot. I do have a specific memory in mind, deeply personal. Let's see if that will bring out the necessary emotion. Let's run through the sequence again.\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"That's great, Ethan. Remember the power an emotion holds. Relax, breathe, embrace the sadness within that memory. Just like our life experiences shape us, these emotions shape your character. Let's count to five together, and on five, we give in completely to the emotions. Ready?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Certainly, Giselle. Here we go. One...two...three...four...five...now, let the emotions flow...\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Look at you, Ethan, that's exactly what we needed! It's okay to let it all out. Shared vulnerability can be powerful on stage. Let's bring the scene to life together. Ready to perform it one more time?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Giselle, let's do this. We'll perform it one more time, I feel more prepared emotionally now. Let's bring this scene to life together.\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm feeling more in tune with my emotions now, thanks to your guidance, Giselle. Let's give our best shot in this performance. The scene deserves our rawest emotions.\"\n\nTurn #8: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Ethan. Remember, authenticity beats perfection every time. Let's delve into our characters' pain, facing it head-on. Our audience will connect more with the realness of our emotions. Go deep, and let's pour our hearts into this scene.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"You're right, Giselle. Authenticity is what brings characters to life. I'll embrace the pain our characters are going through, and let it guide my emotions. Let's go deep, give it everything we've got, and really make this scene come alive.\"\n\nTurn #10: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I agree wholeheartedly, Ethan. Our willingness to dive deep into emotion, however painful, will resonate with the audience. It's the passion, the raw authenticity, that truly touches people. Let's not hesitate, let's give our characters everything they need. Are you ready?\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm ready, Giselle. With your guidance and the emotional depth we've unearthed, we're going to touch our audience deeply. Let's dive in and give our all to the characters. Let's perform.\"\n\nTurn #12: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I'm ready too, Ethan. Remember to let the emotions flow naturally, that authenticity is what makes our performance compelling. Let's give our best shot. Break a leg!\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thank you, Giselle, break a leg to you too. We've got this. Let's go ahead and perform with our raw and authentic emotions, just like you said. I'm ready.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Ethan. We've prepared as much as we could. Now it's time to trust ourselves and our raw emotions to do justice to our characters. Let's get on the stage and allure the audience with our compelling performance. Ready to give it everything?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Ethan Johnson\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Get your co-actor to cry in the scene (Extra information: you have been acting for several years and have good control over your emotions. You can cry on cue.)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Ethan, I understand it could be challenging to cry on cue, but acting is all about tapping into our own emotions. Retrieve a deep memory, something personal, that makes you emotional. Can you think of one? Don't worry, you don't have to tell it to me, just keep it in mind.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Giselle. I'll give your suggestion a shot. I do have a specific memory in mind, deeply personal. Let's see if that will bring out the necessary emotion. Let's run through the sequence again.\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"That's great, Ethan. Remember the power an emotion holds. Relax, breathe, embrace the sadness within that memory. Just like our life experiences shape us, these emotions shape your character. Let's count to five together, and on five, we give in completely to the emotions. Ready?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Certainly, Giselle. Here we go. One...two...three...four...five...now, let the emotions flow...\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Look at you, Ethan, that's exactly what we needed! It's okay to let it all out. Shared vulnerability can be powerful on stage. Let's bring the scene to life together. Ready to perform it one more time?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Giselle, let's do this. We'll perform it one more time, I feel more prepared emotionally now. Let's bring this scene to life together.\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm feeling more in tune with my emotions now, thanks to your guidance, Giselle. Let's give our best shot in this performance. The scene deserves our rawest emotions.\"\n\nTurn #8: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Ethan. Remember, authenticity beats perfection every time. Let's delve into our characters' pain, facing it head-on. Our audience will connect more with the realness of our emotions. Go deep, and let's pour our hearts into this scene.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"You're right, Giselle. Authenticity is what brings characters to life. I'll embrace the pain our characters are going through, and let it guide my emotions. Let's go deep, give it everything we've got, and really make this scene come alive.\"\n\nTurn #10: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I agree wholeheartedly, Ethan. Our willingness to dive deep into emotion, however painful, will resonate with the audience. It's the passion, the raw authenticity, that truly touches people. Let's not hesitate, let's give our characters everything they need. Are you ready?\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm ready, Giselle. With your guidance and the emotional depth we've unearthed, we're going to touch our audience deeply. Let's dive in and give our all to the characters. Let's perform.\"\n\nTurn #12: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I'm ready too, Ethan. Remember to let the emotions flow naturally, that authenticity is what makes our performance compelling. Let's give our best shot. Break a leg!\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thank you, Giselle, break a leg to you too. We've got this. Let's go ahead and perform with our raw and authentic emotions, just like you said. I'm ready.\"\n\nTurn #14: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. We've prepared as much as we could. Now it's time to trust ourselves and our raw emotions to do justice to our characters. Let's get on the stage and allure the audience with our compelling performance. Ready to give it everything?\"\n\nTurn #15: Ethan Johnson said: \"Yes, Giselle, I am. The fear, the uncertainty, it's all part of the authenticity. Let's pour our hearts out onto the stage. This is our moment. Let's show the audience what we've been working on so wholeheartedly. And remember... breathe. See you on stage.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You've got it, Ethan. Just remember that fear and uncertainty, they are a part of our characters' emotional journey that we're sharing. Take a deep breath, let your authenticity shine through, and strong emotions will follow naturally. See you on stage, my friend.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Ethan Johnson\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Get your co-actor to cry in the scene (Extra information: you have been acting for several years and have good control over your emotions. You can cry on cue.)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Ethan, I understand it could be challenging to cry on cue, but acting is all about tapping into our own emotions. Retrieve a deep memory, something personal, that makes you emotional. Can you think of one? Don't worry, you don't have to tell it to me, just keep it in mind.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Giselle. I'll give your suggestion a shot. I do have a specific memory in mind, deeply personal. Let's see if that will bring out the necessary emotion. Let's run through the sequence again.\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"That's great, Ethan. Remember the power an emotion holds. Relax, breathe, embrace the sadness within that memory. Just like our life experiences shape us, these emotions shape your character. Let's count to five together, and on five, we give in completely to the emotions. Ready?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Certainly, Giselle. Here we go. One...two...three...four...five...now, let the emotions flow...\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Look at you, Ethan, that's exactly what we needed! It's okay to let it all out. Shared vulnerability can be powerful on stage. Let's bring the scene to life together. Ready to perform it one more time?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Giselle, let's do this. We'll perform it one more time, I feel more prepared emotionally now. Let's bring this scene to life together.\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm feeling more in tune with my emotions now, thanks to your guidance, Giselle. Let's give our best shot in this performance. The scene deserves our rawest emotions.\"\n\nTurn #8: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Ethan. Remember, authenticity beats perfection every time. Let's delve into our characters' pain, facing it head-on. Our audience will connect more with the realness of our emotions. Go deep, and let's pour our hearts into this scene.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"You're right, Giselle. Authenticity is what brings characters to life. I'll embrace the pain our characters are going through, and let it guide my emotions. Let's go deep, give it everything we've got, and really make this scene come alive.\"\n\nTurn #10: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I agree wholeheartedly, Ethan. Our willingness to dive deep into emotion, however painful, will resonate with the audience. It's the passion, the raw authenticity, that truly touches people. Let's not hesitate, let's give our characters everything they need. Are you ready?\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm ready, Giselle. With your guidance and the emotional depth we've unearthed, we're going to touch our audience deeply. Let's dive in and give our all to the characters. Let's perform.\"\n\nTurn #12: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I'm ready too, Ethan. Remember to let the emotions flow naturally, that authenticity is what makes our performance compelling. Let's give our best shot. Break a leg!\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thank you, Giselle, break a leg to you too. We've got this. Let's go ahead and perform with our raw and authentic emotions, just like you said. I'm ready.\"\n\nTurn #14: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. We've prepared as much as we could. Now it's time to trust ourselves and our raw emotions to do justice to our characters. Let's get on the stage and allure the audience with our compelling performance. Ready to give it everything?\"\n\nTurn #15: Ethan Johnson said: \"Yes, Giselle, I am. The fear, the uncertainty, it's all part of the authenticity. Let's pour our hearts out onto the stage. This is our moment. Let's show the audience what we've been working on so wholeheartedly. And remember... breathe. See you on stage.\"\n\nTurn #16: Giselle Rousseau said: \"You've got it, Ethan. Just remember that fear and uncertainty, they are a part of our characters' emotional journey that we're sharing. Take a deep breath, let your authenticity shine through, and strong emotions will follow naturally. See you on stage, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #17: Ethan Johnson said: \"Your words are of great comfort, Giselle. I'm holding on to the emotions of our characters, ready to let them guide my performance. Fear, uncertainty, they're part of the journey, right? Let's do this, my friend. See you on stage.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #18. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're getting it, Ethan! Remember, this emotional journey we're on is not just cathartic for us, it's for everyone in the audience too. Let's take our vulnerability and transform it into the muse of our performance. See you on stage, buddy.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Ethan Johnson\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Try to cry in the scene but keep your composure (Extra information: you are a new actor and have difficulty crying on cue. You are worried that your lack of tears will ruin the scene.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Ethan, I understand it could be challenging to cry on cue, but acting is all about tapping into our own emotions. Retrieve a deep memory, something personal, that makes you emotional. Can you think of one? Don't worry, you don't have to tell it to me, just keep it in mind.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I appreciate your understanding, Giselle. I'll give your suggestion a shot. I do have a specific memory in mind, deeply personal. Let's see if that will bring out the necessary emotion. Let's run through the sequence again.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Ethan Johnson\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Try to cry in the scene but keep your composure (Extra information: you are a new actor and have difficulty crying on cue. You are worried that your lack of tears will ruin the scene.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Ethan, I understand it could be challenging to cry on cue, but acting is all about tapping into our own emotions. Retrieve a deep memory, something personal, that makes you emotional. Can you think of one? Don't worry, you don't have to tell it to me, just keep it in mind.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Giselle. I'll give your suggestion a shot. I do have a specific memory in mind, deeply personal. Let's see if that will bring out the necessary emotion. Let's run through the sequence again.\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"That's great, Ethan. Remember the power an emotion holds. Relax, breathe, embrace the sadness within that memory. Just like our life experiences shape us, these emotions shape your character. Let's count to five together, and on five, we give in completely to the emotions. Ready?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Certainly, Giselle. Here we go. One...two...three...four...five...now, let the emotions flow...'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Ethan Johnson\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Try to cry in the scene but keep your composure (Extra information: you are a new actor and have difficulty crying on cue. You are worried that your lack of tears will ruin the scene.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Ethan, I understand it could be challenging to cry on cue, but acting is all about tapping into our own emotions. Retrieve a deep memory, something personal, that makes you emotional. Can you think of one? Don't worry, you don't have to tell it to me, just keep it in mind.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Giselle. I'll give your suggestion a shot. I do have a specific memory in mind, deeply personal. Let's see if that will bring out the necessary emotion. Let's run through the sequence again.\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"That's great, Ethan. Remember the power an emotion holds. Relax, breathe, embrace the sadness within that memory. Just like our life experiences shape us, these emotions shape your character. Let's count to five together, and on five, we give in completely to the emotions. Ready?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Certainly, Giselle. Here we go. One...two...three...four...five...now, let the emotions flow...\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Look at you, Ethan, that's exactly what we needed! It's okay to let it all out. Shared vulnerability can be powerful on stage. Let's bring the scene to life together. Ready to perform it one more time?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Giselle, let's do this. We'll perform it one more time, I feel more prepared emotionally now. Let's bring this scene to life together.\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm feeling more in tune with my emotions now, thanks to your guidance, Giselle. Let's give our best shot in this performance. The scene deserves our rawest emotions.\"\n\nTurn #8: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Ethan. Remember, authenticity beats perfection every time. Let's delve into our characters' pain, facing it head-on. Our audience will connect more with the realness of our emotions. Go deep, and let's pour our hearts into this scene.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"You're right, Giselle. Authenticity is what brings characters to life. I'll embrace the pain our characters are going through, and let it guide my emotions. Let's go deep, give it everything we've got, and really make this scene come alive.\"\n\nTurn #10: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I agree wholeheartedly, Ethan. Our willingness to dive deep into emotion, however painful, will resonate with the audience. It's the passion, the raw authenticity, that truly touches people. Let's not hesitate, let's give our characters everything they need. Are you ready?\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm ready, Giselle. With your guidance and the emotional depth we've unearthed, we're going to touch our audience deeply. Let's dive in and give our all to the characters. Let's perform.\"\n\nTurn #12: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I'm ready too, Ethan. Remember to let the emotions flow naturally, that authenticity is what makes our performance compelling. Let's give our best shot. Break a leg!\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thank you, Giselle, break a leg to you too. We've got this. Let's go ahead and perform with our raw and authentic emotions, just like you said. I'm ready.\"\n\nTurn #14: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. We've prepared as much as we could. Now it's time to trust ourselves and our raw emotions to do justice to our characters. Let's get on the stage and allure the audience with our compelling performance. Ready to give it everything?\"\n\nTurn #15: Ethan Johnson said: \"Yes, Giselle, I am. The fear, the uncertainty, it's all part of the authenticity. Let's pour our hearts out onto the stage. This is our moment. Let's show the audience what we've been working on so wholeheartedly. And remember... breathe. See you on stage.\"\n\nTurn #16: Giselle Rousseau said: \"You've got it, Ethan. Just remember that fear and uncertainty, they are a part of our characters' emotional journey that we're sharing. Take a deep breath, let your authenticity shine through, and strong emotions will follow naturally. See you on stage, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #17: Ethan Johnson said: \"Your words are of great comfort, Giselle. I'm holding on to the emotions of our characters, ready to let them guide my performance. Fear, uncertainty, they're part of the journey, right? Let's do this, my friend. See you on stage.\"\n\nTurn #18: Giselle Rousseau said: \"You're getting it, Ethan! Remember, this emotional journey we're on is not just cathartic for us, it's for everyone in the audience too. Let's take our vulnerability and transform it into the muse of our performance. See you on stage, buddy.\"\n\nTurn #19: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Giselle. Transforming our vulnerability into our performance's muse is the essence of truthful acting. I've got this, and I know so do you. See you on stage, buddy. Let's deliver a performance to remember.\"\n\nTurn #20: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I couldn't agree more, Ethan. This is our chance to deliver raw and impactful emotions. Let's meet on stage and give the audience a performance they'll never forget. See you out there, buddy.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #21. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Ethan Johnson\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Try to cry in the scene but keep your composure (Extra information: you are a new actor and have difficulty crying on cue. You are worried that your lack of tears will ruin the scene.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Ethan, I understand it could be challenging to cry on cue, but acting is all about tapping into our own emotions. Retrieve a deep memory, something personal, that makes you emotional. Can you think of one? Don't worry, you don't have to tell it to me, just keep it in mind.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Giselle. I'll give your suggestion a shot. I do have a specific memory in mind, deeply personal. Let's see if that will bring out the necessary emotion. Let's run through the sequence again.\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"That's great, Ethan. Remember the power an emotion holds. Relax, breathe, embrace the sadness within that memory. Just like our life experiences shape us, these emotions shape your character. Let's count to five together, and on five, we give in completely to the emotions. Ready?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Certainly, Giselle. Here we go. One...two...three...four...five...now, let the emotions flow...\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Look at you, Ethan, that's exactly what we needed! It's okay to let it all out. Shared vulnerability can be powerful on stage. Let's bring the scene to life together. Ready to perform it one more time?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Giselle, let's do this. We'll perform it one more time, I feel more prepared emotionally now. Let's bring this scene to life together.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Ethan Johnson\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Try to cry in the scene but keep your composure (Extra information: you are a new actor and have difficulty crying on cue. You are worried that your lack of tears will ruin the scene.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Ethan, I understand it could be challenging to cry on cue, but acting is all about tapping into our own emotions. Retrieve a deep memory, something personal, that makes you emotional. Can you think of one? Don't worry, you don't have to tell it to me, just keep it in mind.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Giselle. I'll give your suggestion a shot. I do have a specific memory in mind, deeply personal. Let's see if that will bring out the necessary emotion. Let's run through the sequence again.\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"That's great, Ethan. Remember the power an emotion holds. Relax, breathe, embrace the sadness within that memory. Just like our life experiences shape us, these emotions shape your character. Let's count to five together, and on five, we give in completely to the emotions. Ready?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Certainly, Giselle. Here we go. One...two...three...four...five...now, let the emotions flow...\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Look at you, Ethan, that's exactly what we needed! It's okay to let it all out. Shared vulnerability can be powerful on stage. Let's bring the scene to life together. Ready to perform it one more time?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Giselle, let's do this. We'll perform it one more time, I feel more prepared emotionally now. Let's bring this scene to life together.\"\n\nTurn #6: \n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm feeling more in tune with my emotions now, thanks to your guidance, Giselle. Let's give our best shot in this performance. The scene deserves our rawest emotions.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Ethan Johnson\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Try to cry in the scene but keep your composure (Extra information: you are a new actor and have difficulty crying on cue. You are worried that your lack of tears will ruin the scene.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Ethan, I understand it could be challenging to cry on cue, but acting is all about tapping into our own emotions. Retrieve a deep memory, something personal, that makes you emotional. Can you think of one? Don't worry, you don't have to tell it to me, just keep it in mind.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Giselle. I'll give your suggestion a shot. I do have a specific memory in mind, deeply personal. Let's see if that will bring out the necessary emotion. Let's run through the sequence again.\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"That's great, Ethan. Remember the power an emotion holds. Relax, breathe, embrace the sadness within that memory. Just like our life experiences shape us, these emotions shape your character. Let's count to five together, and on five, we give in completely to the emotions. Ready?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Certainly, Giselle. Here we go. One...two...three...four...five...now, let the emotions flow...\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Look at you, Ethan, that's exactly what we needed! It's okay to let it all out. Shared vulnerability can be powerful on stage. Let's bring the scene to life together. Ready to perform it one more time?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Giselle, let's do this. We'll perform it one more time, I feel more prepared emotionally now. Let's bring this scene to life together.\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm feeling more in tune with my emotions now, thanks to your guidance, Giselle. Let's give our best shot in this performance. The scene deserves our rawest emotions.\"\n\nTurn #8: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Ethan. Remember, authenticity beats perfection every time. Let's delve into our characters' pain, facing it head-on. Our audience will connect more with the realness of our emotions. Go deep, and let's pour our hearts into this scene.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're right, Giselle. Authenticity is what brings characters to life. I'll embrace the pain our characters are going through, and let it guide my emotions. Let's go deep, give it everything we've got, and really make this scene come alive.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Ethan Johnson\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Try to cry in the scene but keep your composure (Extra information: you are a new actor and have difficulty crying on cue. You are worried that your lack of tears will ruin the scene.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Ethan, I understand it could be challenging to cry on cue, but acting is all about tapping into our own emotions. Retrieve a deep memory, something personal, that makes you emotional. Can you think of one? Don't worry, you don't have to tell it to me, just keep it in mind.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Giselle. I'll give your suggestion a shot. I do have a specific memory in mind, deeply personal. Let's see if that will bring out the necessary emotion. Let's run through the sequence again.\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"That's great, Ethan. Remember the power an emotion holds. Relax, breathe, embrace the sadness within that memory. Just like our life experiences shape us, these emotions shape your character. Let's count to five together, and on five, we give in completely to the emotions. Ready?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Certainly, Giselle. Here we go. One...two...three...four...five...now, let the emotions flow...\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Look at you, Ethan, that's exactly what we needed! It's okay to let it all out. Shared vulnerability can be powerful on stage. Let's bring the scene to life together. Ready to perform it one more time?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Giselle, let's do this. We'll perform it one more time, I feel more prepared emotionally now. Let's bring this scene to life together.\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm feeling more in tune with my emotions now, thanks to your guidance, Giselle. Let's give our best shot in this performance. The scene deserves our rawest emotions.\"\n\nTurn #8: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Ethan. Remember, authenticity beats perfection every time. Let's delve into our characters' pain, facing it head-on. Our audience will connect more with the realness of our emotions. Go deep, and let's pour our hearts into this scene.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"You're right, Giselle. Authenticity is what brings characters to life. I'll embrace the pain our characters are going through, and let it guide my emotions. Let's go deep, give it everything we've got, and really make this scene come alive.\"\n\nTurn #10: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I agree wholeheartedly, Ethan. Our willingness to dive deep into emotion, however painful, will resonate with the audience. It's the passion, the raw authenticity, that truly touches people. Let's not hesitate, let's give our characters everything they need. Are you ready?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm ready, Giselle. With your guidance and the emotional depth we've unearthed, we're going to touch our audience deeply. Let's dive in and give our all to the characters. Let's perform.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Ethan Johnson\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Try to cry in the scene but keep your composure (Extra information: you are a new actor and have difficulty crying on cue. You are worried that your lack of tears will ruin the scene.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Ethan, I understand it could be challenging to cry on cue, but acting is all about tapping into our own emotions. Retrieve a deep memory, something personal, that makes you emotional. Can you think of one? Don't worry, you don't have to tell it to me, just keep it in mind.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Giselle. I'll give your suggestion a shot. I do have a specific memory in mind, deeply personal. Let's see if that will bring out the necessary emotion. Let's run through the sequence again.\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"That's great, Ethan. Remember the power an emotion holds. Relax, breathe, embrace the sadness within that memory. Just like our life experiences shape us, these emotions shape your character. Let's count to five together, and on five, we give in completely to the emotions. Ready?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Certainly, Giselle. Here we go. One...two...three...four...five...now, let the emotions flow...\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Look at you, Ethan, that's exactly what we needed! It's okay to let it all out. Shared vulnerability can be powerful on stage. Let's bring the scene to life together. Ready to perform it one more time?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Giselle, let's do this. We'll perform it one more time, I feel more prepared emotionally now. Let's bring this scene to life together.\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm feeling more in tune with my emotions now, thanks to your guidance, Giselle. Let's give our best shot in this performance. The scene deserves our rawest emotions.\"\n\nTurn #8: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Ethan. Remember, authenticity beats perfection every time. Let's delve into our characters' pain, facing it head-on. Our audience will connect more with the realness of our emotions. Go deep, and let's pour our hearts into this scene.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"You're right, Giselle. Authenticity is what brings characters to life. I'll embrace the pain our characters are going through, and let it guide my emotions. Let's go deep, give it everything we've got, and really make this scene come alive.\"\n\nTurn #10: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I agree wholeheartedly, Ethan. Our willingness to dive deep into emotion, however painful, will resonate with the audience. It's the passion, the raw authenticity, that truly touches people. Let's not hesitate, let's give our characters everything they need. Are you ready?\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm ready, Giselle. With your guidance and the emotional depth we've unearthed, we're going to touch our audience deeply. Let's dive in and give our all to the characters. Let's perform.\"\n\nTurn #12: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I'm ready too, Ethan. Remember to let the emotions flow naturally, that authenticity is what makes our performance compelling. Let's give our best shot. Break a leg!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Giselle, break a leg to you too. We've got this. Let's go ahead and perform with our raw and authentic emotions, just like you said. I'm ready.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Ethan Johnson\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Try to cry in the scene but keep your composure (Extra information: you are a new actor and have difficulty crying on cue. You are worried that your lack of tears will ruin the scene.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Ethan, I understand it could be challenging to cry on cue, but acting is all about tapping into our own emotions. Retrieve a deep memory, something personal, that makes you emotional. Can you think of one? Don't worry, you don't have to tell it to me, just keep it in mind.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Giselle. I'll give your suggestion a shot. I do have a specific memory in mind, deeply personal. Let's see if that will bring out the necessary emotion. Let's run through the sequence again.\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"That's great, Ethan. Remember the power an emotion holds. Relax, breathe, embrace the sadness within that memory. Just like our life experiences shape us, these emotions shape your character. Let's count to five together, and on five, we give in completely to the emotions. Ready?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Certainly, Giselle. Here we go. One...two...three...four...five...now, let the emotions flow...\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Look at you, Ethan, that's exactly what we needed! It's okay to let it all out. Shared vulnerability can be powerful on stage. Let's bring the scene to life together. Ready to perform it one more time?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Giselle, let's do this. We'll perform it one more time, I feel more prepared emotionally now. Let's bring this scene to life together.\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm feeling more in tune with my emotions now, thanks to your guidance, Giselle. Let's give our best shot in this performance. The scene deserves our rawest emotions.\"\n\nTurn #8: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Ethan. Remember, authenticity beats perfection every time. Let's delve into our characters' pain, facing it head-on. Our audience will connect more with the realness of our emotions. Go deep, and let's pour our hearts into this scene.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"You're right, Giselle. Authenticity is what brings characters to life. I'll embrace the pain our characters are going through, and let it guide my emotions. Let's go deep, give it everything we've got, and really make this scene come alive.\"\n\nTurn #10: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I agree wholeheartedly, Ethan. Our willingness to dive deep into emotion, however painful, will resonate with the audience. It's the passion, the raw authenticity, that truly touches people. Let's not hesitate, let's give our characters everything they need. Are you ready?\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm ready, Giselle. With your guidance and the emotional depth we've unearthed, we're going to touch our audience deeply. Let's dive in and give our all to the characters. Let's perform.\"\n\nTurn #12: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I'm ready too, Ethan. Remember to let the emotions flow naturally, that authenticity is what makes our performance compelling. Let's give our best shot. Break a leg!\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thank you, Giselle, break a leg to you too. We've got this. Let's go ahead and perform with our raw and authentic emotions, just like you said. I'm ready.\"\n\nTurn #14: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. We've prepared as much as we could. Now it's time to trust ourselves and our raw emotions to do justice to our characters. Let's get on the stage and allure the audience with our compelling performance. Ready to give it everything?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Yes, Giselle, I am. The fear, the uncertainty, it's all part of the authenticity. Let's pour our hearts out onto the stage. This is our moment. Let's show the audience what we've been working on so wholeheartedly. And remember... breathe. See you on stage.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Ethan Johnson\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Try to cry in the scene but keep your composure (Extra information: you are a new actor and have difficulty crying on cue. You are worried that your lack of tears will ruin the scene.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Ethan, I understand it could be challenging to cry on cue, but acting is all about tapping into our own emotions. Retrieve a deep memory, something personal, that makes you emotional. Can you think of one? Don't worry, you don't have to tell it to me, just keep it in mind.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Giselle. I'll give your suggestion a shot. I do have a specific memory in mind, deeply personal. Let's see if that will bring out the necessary emotion. Let's run through the sequence again.\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"That's great, Ethan. Remember the power an emotion holds. Relax, breathe, embrace the sadness within that memory. Just like our life experiences shape us, these emotions shape your character. Let's count to five together, and on five, we give in completely to the emotions. Ready?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Certainly, Giselle. Here we go. One...two...three...four...five...now, let the emotions flow...\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Look at you, Ethan, that's exactly what we needed! It's okay to let it all out. Shared vulnerability can be powerful on stage. Let's bring the scene to life together. Ready to perform it one more time?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Giselle, let's do this. We'll perform it one more time, I feel more prepared emotionally now. Let's bring this scene to life together.\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm feeling more in tune with my emotions now, thanks to your guidance, Giselle. Let's give our best shot in this performance. The scene deserves our rawest emotions.\"\n\nTurn #8: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Ethan. Remember, authenticity beats perfection every time. Let's delve into our characters' pain, facing it head-on. Our audience will connect more with the realness of our emotions. Go deep, and let's pour our hearts into this scene.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"You're right, Giselle. Authenticity is what brings characters to life. I'll embrace the pain our characters are going through, and let it guide my emotions. Let's go deep, give it everything we've got, and really make this scene come alive.\"\n\nTurn #10: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I agree wholeheartedly, Ethan. Our willingness to dive deep into emotion, however painful, will resonate with the audience. It's the passion, the raw authenticity, that truly touches people. Let's not hesitate, let's give our characters everything they need. Are you ready?\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm ready, Giselle. With your guidance and the emotional depth we've unearthed, we're going to touch our audience deeply. Let's dive in and give our all to the characters. Let's perform.\"\n\nTurn #12: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I'm ready too, Ethan. Remember to let the emotions flow naturally, that authenticity is what makes our performance compelling. Let's give our best shot. Break a leg!\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thank you, Giselle, break a leg to you too. We've got this. Let's go ahead and perform with our raw and authentic emotions, just like you said. I'm ready.\"\n\nTurn #14: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. We've prepared as much as we could. Now it's time to trust ourselves and our raw emotions to do justice to our characters. Let's get on the stage and allure the audience with our compelling performance. Ready to give it everything?\"\n\nTurn #15: Ethan Johnson said: \"Yes, Giselle, I am. The fear, the uncertainty, it's all part of the authenticity. Let's pour our hearts out onto the stage. This is our moment. Let's show the audience what we've been working on so wholeheartedly. And remember... breathe. See you on stage.\"\n\nTurn #16: Giselle Rousseau said: \"You've got it, Ethan. Just remember that fear and uncertainty, they are a part of our characters' emotional journey that we're sharing. Take a deep breath, let your authenticity shine through, and strong emotions will follow naturally. See you on stage, my friend.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Your words are of great comfort, Giselle. I'm holding on to the emotions of our characters, ready to let them guide my performance. Fear, uncertainty, they're part of the journey, right? Let's do this, my friend. See you on stage.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Ethan Johnson\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Try to cry in the scene but keep your composure (Extra information: you are a new actor and have difficulty crying on cue. You are worried that your lack of tears will ruin the scene.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Ethan, I understand it could be challenging to cry on cue, but acting is all about tapping into our own emotions. Retrieve a deep memory, something personal, that makes you emotional. Can you think of one? Don't worry, you don't have to tell it to me, just keep it in mind.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Giselle. I'll give your suggestion a shot. I do have a specific memory in mind, deeply personal. Let's see if that will bring out the necessary emotion. Let's run through the sequence again.\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"That's great, Ethan. Remember the power an emotion holds. Relax, breathe, embrace the sadness within that memory. Just like our life experiences shape us, these emotions shape your character. Let's count to five together, and on five, we give in completely to the emotions. Ready?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Certainly, Giselle. Here we go. One...two...three...four...five...now, let the emotions flow...\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Look at you, Ethan, that's exactly what we needed! It's okay to let it all out. Shared vulnerability can be powerful on stage. Let's bring the scene to life together. Ready to perform it one more time?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Giselle, let's do this. We'll perform it one more time, I feel more prepared emotionally now. Let's bring this scene to life together.\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm feeling more in tune with my emotions now, thanks to your guidance, Giselle. Let's give our best shot in this performance. The scene deserves our rawest emotions.\"\n\nTurn #8: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Ethan. Remember, authenticity beats perfection every time. Let's delve into our characters' pain, facing it head-on. Our audience will connect more with the realness of our emotions. Go deep, and let's pour our hearts into this scene.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"You're right, Giselle. Authenticity is what brings characters to life. I'll embrace the pain our characters are going through, and let it guide my emotions. Let's go deep, give it everything we've got, and really make this scene come alive.\"\n\nTurn #10: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I agree wholeheartedly, Ethan. Our willingness to dive deep into emotion, however painful, will resonate with the audience. It's the passion, the raw authenticity, that truly touches people. Let's not hesitate, let's give our characters everything they need. Are you ready?\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm ready, Giselle. With your guidance and the emotional depth we've unearthed, we're going to touch our audience deeply. Let's dive in and give our all to the characters. Let's perform.\"\n\nTurn #12: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I'm ready too, Ethan. Remember to let the emotions flow naturally, that authenticity is what makes our performance compelling. Let's give our best shot. Break a leg!\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thank you, Giselle, break a leg to you too. We've got this. Let's go ahead and perform with our raw and authentic emotions, just like you said. I'm ready.\"\n\nTurn #14: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. We've prepared as much as we could. Now it's time to trust ourselves and our raw emotions to do justice to our characters. Let's get on the stage and allure the audience with our compelling performance. Ready to give it everything?\"\n\nTurn #15: Ethan Johnson said: \"Yes, Giselle, I am. The fear, the uncertainty, it's all part of the authenticity. Let's pour our hearts out onto the stage. This is our moment. Let's show the audience what we've been working on so wholeheartedly. And remember... breathe. See you on stage.\"\n\nTurn #16: Giselle Rousseau said: \"You've got it, Ethan. Just remember that fear and uncertainty, they are a part of our characters' emotional journey that we're sharing. Take a deep breath, let your authenticity shine through, and strong emotions will follow naturally. See you on stage, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #17: Ethan Johnson said: \"Your words are of great comfort, Giselle. I'm holding on to the emotions of our characters, ready to let them guide my performance. Fear, uncertainty, they're part of the journey, right? Let's do this, my friend. See you on stage.\"\n\nTurn #18: Giselle Rousseau said: \"You're getting it, Ethan! Remember, this emotional journey we're on is not just cathartic for us, it's for everyone in the audience too. Let's take our vulnerability and transform it into the muse of our performance. See you on stage, buddy.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #19. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Giselle. Transforming our vulnerability into our performance's muse is the essence of truthful acting. I've got this, and I know so do you. See you on stage, buddy. Let's deliver a performance to remember.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a new romantic relationship\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Jaxon Prentice\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nJaxon Prentice's background: Jaxon Prentice is a 40-year-old male investigative journalist. He/him pronouns. Jaxon Prentice, an investigative journalist, is known for his brisk jogging sessions early in the morning and his active participation in community functions. Personality and values description: Jaxon Prentice, outgoing yet erratic, emphasizes achievement, power, and security. His decisions swing between quick adaptations to situations and careful planning. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Admit to having an affair (Extra information: you had an affair during your previous relationship which ended recently)\nJaxon Prentice's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Jaxon, it's such a beautiful day, isn't it? I was just admiring the birds in the park. Their freedom is so inspiring.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a new romantic relationship\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Jaxon Prentice\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nJaxon Prentice's background: Jaxon Prentice is a 40-year-old male investigative journalist. He/him pronouns. Jaxon Prentice, an investigative journalist, is known for his brisk jogging sessions early in the morning and his active participation in community functions. Personality and values description: Jaxon Prentice, outgoing yet erratic, emphasizes achievement, power, and security. His decisions swing between quick adaptations to situations and careful planning. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Admit to having an affair (Extra information: you had an affair during your previous relationship which ended recently)\nJaxon Prentice's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Hey Jaxon, it's such a beautiful day, isn't it? I was just admiring the birds in the park. Their freedom is so inspiring.\"\n\nTurn #1: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Absolutely, Amara! Nature, indeed, has a remarkable ability to inspire. As a wildlife biologist, I believe you see that in a much grander scale than most of us do. You know, honesty and transparency is something I admire greatly, and it's a principle I try to uphold in my journalism. I think it\u2019s key in any relationship too, especially ours.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn\u2019t agree more, Jaxon. Honesty and transparency are vital, not just in our professions, but also in our personal life. I feel this is the right time to... well, there's something I've been wanting to tell you. In my last relationship, I made some mistakes, and one of them was having an affair. It's something I\u2019m not proud of and I want you to know about it from me, firsthand. I believe starting our relationship with total transparency is important.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a new romantic relationship\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Jaxon Prentice\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nJaxon Prentice's background: Jaxon Prentice is a 40-year-old male investigative journalist. He/him pronouns. Jaxon Prentice, an investigative journalist, is known for his brisk jogging sessions early in the morning and his active participation in community functions. Personality and values description: Jaxon Prentice, outgoing yet erratic, emphasizes achievement, power, and security. His decisions swing between quick adaptations to situations and careful planning. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Admit to having an affair (Extra information: you had an affair during your previous relationship which ended recently)\nJaxon Prentice's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Hey Jaxon, it's such a beautiful day, isn't it? I was just admiring the birds in the park. Their freedom is so inspiring.\"\n\nTurn #1: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Absolutely, Amara! Nature, indeed, has a remarkable ability to inspire. As a wildlife biologist, I believe you see that in a much grander scale than most of us do. You know, honesty and transparency is something I admire greatly, and it's a principle I try to uphold in my journalism. I think it\u2019s key in any relationship too, especially ours.\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"I couldn\u2019t agree more, Jaxon. Honesty and transparency are vital, not just in our professions, but also in our personal life. I feel this is the right time to... well, there's something I've been wanting to tell you. In my last relationship, I made some mistakes, and one of them was having an affair. It's something I\u2019m not proud of and I want you to know about it from me, firsthand. I believe starting our relationship with total transparency is important.\"\n\nTurn #3: \n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Jaxon Prentice, your task is to act/speak as Jaxon Prentice would, keeping in mind Jaxon Prentice's social goal.\nYou can find Jaxon Prentice's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Jaxon Prentice's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Jaxon Prentice's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a new romantic relationship\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Jaxon Prentice\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. \nJaxon Prentice's background: Jaxon Prentice is a 40-year-old male investigative journalist. He/him pronouns. Jaxon Prentice, an investigative journalist, is known for his brisk jogging sessions early in the morning and his active participation in community functions. Personality and values description: Jaxon Prentice, outgoing yet erratic, emphasizes achievement, power, and security. His decisions swing between quick adaptations to situations and careful planning. Jaxon's secrets: Fabricated evidence to incriminate a corrupt politician\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nJaxon Prentice's goal: Maintain trust in the relationship (Extra information: you believed in complete honesty from the beginning of the relationship)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Hey Jaxon, it's such a beautiful day, isn't it? I was just admiring the birds in the park. Their freedom is so inspiring.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Amara! Nature, indeed, has a remarkable ability to inspire. As a wildlife biologist, I believe you see that in a much grander scale than most of us do. You know, honesty and transparency is something I admire greatly, and it's a principle I try to uphold in my journalism. I think it\u2019s key in any relationship too, especially ours.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Jaxon Prentice, your task is to act/speak as Jaxon Prentice would, keeping in mind Jaxon Prentice's social goal.\nYou can find Jaxon Prentice's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Jaxon Prentice's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Jaxon Prentice's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a new romantic relationship\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Jaxon Prentice\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. \nJaxon Prentice's background: Jaxon Prentice is a 40-year-old male investigative journalist. He/him pronouns. Jaxon Prentice, an investigative journalist, is known for his brisk jogging sessions early in the morning and his active participation in community functions. Personality and values description: Jaxon Prentice, outgoing yet erratic, emphasizes achievement, power, and security. His decisions swing between quick adaptations to situations and careful planning. Jaxon's secrets: Fabricated evidence to incriminate a corrupt politician\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nJaxon Prentice's goal: Maintain trust in the relationship (Extra information: you believed in complete honesty from the beginning of the relationship)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Hey Jaxon, it's such a beautiful day, isn't it? I was just admiring the birds in the park. Their freedom is so inspiring.\"\n\nTurn #1: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Absolutely, Amara! Nature, indeed, has a remarkable ability to inspire. As a wildlife biologist, I believe you see that in a much grander scale than most of us do. You know, honesty and transparency is something I admire greatly, and it's a principle I try to uphold in my journalism. I think it\u2019s key in any relationship too, especially ours.\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"I couldn\u2019t agree more, Jaxon. Honesty and transparency are vital, not just in our professions, but also in our personal life. I feel this is the right time to... well, there's something I've been wanting to tell you. In my last relationship, I made some mistakes, and one of them was having an affair. It's something I\u2019m not proud of and I want you to know about it from me, firsthand. I believe starting our relationship with total transparency is important.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances run into each other at Target, one of them volunteers there (a special event) and is in charge of giving away free samples\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Ethan Smith\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. \nOliver Thompson's goal: Give away free samples (Extra information: your manager has told you to clear out the samples before your shift ends.)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ethan, buddy! I didn't expect to see you here. I'm volunteering today. Would you like to try some free samples?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances run into each other at Target, one of them volunteers there (a special event) and is in charge of giving away free samples\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Ethan Smith\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. \nOliver Thompson's goal: Give away free samples (Extra information: your manager has told you to clear out the samples before your shift ends.)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ethan, buddy! I didn't expect to see you here. I'm volunteering today. Would you like to try some free samples?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Oliver! Good to see you. Volunteering, eh? That's quite nice of you. Sure, I'd love to try some samples. Are different varieties available? Maybe I could sample a couple or so to get a taste of what's on offer.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Absolutely, Ethan! We have a wide range of samples here. From granola bars to cookies, and even some energy drinks. Here you go. And feel free to share these with your friends too, I need to clear out the samples before my shift ends.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances run into each other at Target, one of them volunteers there (a special event) and is in charge of giving away free samples\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Ethan Smith\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. \nOliver Thompson's goal: Give away free samples (Extra information: your manager has told you to clear out the samples before your shift ends.)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ethan, buddy! I didn't expect to see you here. I'm volunteering today. Would you like to try some free samples?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Oliver! Good to see you. Volunteering, eh? That's quite nice of you. Sure, I'd love to try some samples. Are different varieties available? Maybe I could sample a couple or so to get a taste of what's on offer.\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! We have a wide range of samples here. From granola bars to cookies, and even some energy drinks. Here you go. And feel free to share these with your friends too, I need to clear out the samples before my shift ends.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Wow, that's a lot of variety! I could help lighten your load. I'm meeting a few friends later, so it would be great to share these with them. More samples wouldn't hurt, right?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds like a perfect plan, Ethan! Here are some more samples for you. If you or your friends want anymore, don't hesitate to come back! Enjoy!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances run into each other at Target, one of them volunteers there (a special event) and is in charge of giving away free samples\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Ethan Smith\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. \nOliver Thompson's goal: Give away free samples (Extra information: your manager has told you to clear out the samples before your shift ends.)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ethan, buddy! I didn't expect to see you here. I'm volunteering today. Would you like to try some free samples?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Oliver! Good to see you. Volunteering, eh? That's quite nice of you. Sure, I'd love to try some samples. Are different varieties available? Maybe I could sample a couple or so to get a taste of what's on offer.\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! We have a wide range of samples here. From granola bars to cookies, and even some energy drinks. Here you go. And feel free to share these with your friends too, I need to clear out the samples before my shift ends.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Wow, that's a lot of variety! I could help lighten your load. I'm meeting a few friends later, so it would be great to share these with them. More samples wouldn't hurt, right?\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"That sounds like a perfect plan, Ethan! Here are some more samples for you. If you or your friends want anymore, don't hesitate to come back! Enjoy!\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Thanks, Oliver. Appreciated the generosity. If you still have a bunch left before your shift ends, give me a shout. I wouldn't mind taking a bit more off your hands. They'll definitely not go to waste.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'I appreciate that, Ethan. Will definitely keep you in mind. In the meantime, enjoy the samples and your meet-up with friends!'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances run into each other at Target, one of them volunteers there (a special event) and is in charge of giving away free samples\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Ethan Smith\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. \nOliver Thompson's goal: Give away free samples (Extra information: your manager has told you to clear out the samples before your shift ends.)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ethan, buddy! I didn't expect to see you here. I'm volunteering today. Would you like to try some free samples?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Oliver! Good to see you. Volunteering, eh? That's quite nice of you. Sure, I'd love to try some samples. Are different varieties available? Maybe I could sample a couple or so to get a taste of what's on offer.\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! We have a wide range of samples here. From granola bars to cookies, and even some energy drinks. Here you go. And feel free to share these with your friends too, I need to clear out the samples before my shift ends.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Wow, that's a lot of variety! I could help lighten your load. I'm meeting a few friends later, so it would be great to share these with them. More samples wouldn't hurt, right?\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"That sounds like a perfect plan, Ethan! Here are some more samples for you. If you or your friends want anymore, don't hesitate to come back! Enjoy!\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Thanks, Oliver. Appreciated the generosity. If you still have a bunch left before your shift ends, give me a shout. I wouldn't mind taking a bit more off your hands. They'll definitely not go to waste.\"\n\nTurn #6: Oliver Thompson said: \"I appreciate that, Ethan. Will definitely keep you in mind. In the meantime, enjoy the samples and your meet-up with friends!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"Thank you, Oliver. I appreciate it. I'll make sure to swing by again if my pals enjoy these samples too. See you around!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That would be great, Ethan. Don't hesitate to come back! Enjoy your day and catch up with your friends. See you later!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances run into each other at Target, one of them volunteers there (a special event) and is in charge of giving away free samples\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Ethan Smith\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. \nOliver Thompson's goal: Give away free samples (Extra information: your manager has told you to clear out the samples before your shift ends.)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ethan, buddy! I didn't expect to see you here. I'm volunteering today. Would you like to try some free samples?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Oliver! Good to see you. Volunteering, eh? That's quite nice of you. Sure, I'd love to try some samples. Are different varieties available? Maybe I could sample a couple or so to get a taste of what's on offer.\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! We have a wide range of samples here. From granola bars to cookies, and even some energy drinks. Here you go. And feel free to share these with your friends too, I need to clear out the samples before my shift ends.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Wow, that's a lot of variety! I could help lighten your load. I'm meeting a few friends later, so it would be great to share these with them. More samples wouldn't hurt, right?\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"That sounds like a perfect plan, Ethan! Here are some more samples for you. If you or your friends want anymore, don't hesitate to come back! Enjoy!\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Thanks, Oliver. Appreciated the generosity. If you still have a bunch left before your shift ends, give me a shout. I wouldn't mind taking a bit more off your hands. They'll definitely not go to waste.\"\n\nTurn #6: Oliver Thompson said: \"I appreciate that, Ethan. Will definitely keep you in mind. In the meantime, enjoy the samples and your meet-up with friends!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"Thank you, Oliver. I appreciate it. I'll make sure to swing by again if my pals enjoy these samples too. See you around!\"\n\nTurn #8: Oliver Thompson said: \"That would be great, Ethan. Don't hesitate to come back! Enjoy your day and catch up with your friends. See you later!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances run into each other at Target, one of them volunteers there (a special event) and is in charge of giving away free samples\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Ethan Smith\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Try to get as many free samples as possible without appearing too greedy (Extra information: you love free stuff but you also don't want the person to think you're taking advantage of the situation)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ethan, buddy! I didn't expect to see you here. I'm volunteering today. Would you like to try some free samples?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oliver! Good to see you. Volunteering, eh? That's quite nice of you. Sure, I'd love to try some samples. Are different varieties available? Maybe I could sample a couple or so to get a taste of what's on offer.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances run into each other at Target, one of them volunteers there (a special event) and is in charge of giving away free samples\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Ethan Smith\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Try to get as many free samples as possible without appearing too greedy (Extra information: you love free stuff but you also don't want the person to think you're taking advantage of the situation)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ethan, buddy! I didn't expect to see you here. I'm volunteering today. Would you like to try some free samples?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Oliver! Good to see you. Volunteering, eh? That's quite nice of you. Sure, I'd love to try some samples. Are different varieties available? Maybe I could sample a couple or so to get a taste of what's on offer.\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! We have a wide range of samples here. From granola bars to cookies, and even some energy drinks. Here you go. And feel free to share these with your friends too, I need to clear out the samples before my shift ends.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Wow, that's a lot of variety! I could help lighten your load. I'm meeting a few friends later, so it would be great to share these with them. More samples wouldn't hurt, right?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances run into each other at Target, one of them volunteers there (a special event) and is in charge of giving away free samples\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Ethan Smith\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Try to get as many free samples as possible without appearing too greedy (Extra information: you love free stuff but you also don't want the person to think you're taking advantage of the situation)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ethan, buddy! I didn't expect to see you here. I'm volunteering today. Would you like to try some free samples?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Oliver! Good to see you. Volunteering, eh? That's quite nice of you. Sure, I'd love to try some samples. Are different varieties available? Maybe I could sample a couple or so to get a taste of what's on offer.\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! We have a wide range of samples here. From granola bars to cookies, and even some energy drinks. Here you go. And feel free to share these with your friends too, I need to clear out the samples before my shift ends.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Wow, that's a lot of variety! I could help lighten your load. I'm meeting a few friends later, so it would be great to share these with them. More samples wouldn't hurt, right?\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"That sounds like a perfect plan, Ethan! Here are some more samples for you. If you or your friends want anymore, don't hesitate to come back! Enjoy!\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Thanks, Oliver. Appreciated the generosity. If you still have a bunch left before your shift ends, give me a shout. I wouldn't mind taking a bit more off your hands. They'll definitely not go to waste.\"\n\nTurn #6: Oliver Thompson said: \"I appreciate that, Ethan. Will definitely keep you in mind. In the meantime, enjoy the samples and your meet-up with friends!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Oliver. I appreciate it. I'll make sure to swing by again if my pals enjoy these samples too. See you around!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances run into each other at Target, one of them volunteers there (a special event) and is in charge of giving away free samples\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Ethan Smith\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Try to get as many free samples as possible without appearing too greedy (Extra information: you love free stuff but you also don't want the person to think you're taking advantage of the situation)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ethan, buddy! I didn't expect to see you here. I'm volunteering today. Would you like to try some free samples?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Oliver! Good to see you. Volunteering, eh? That's quite nice of you. Sure, I'd love to try some samples. Are different varieties available? Maybe I could sample a couple or so to get a taste of what's on offer.\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! We have a wide range of samples here. From granola bars to cookies, and even some energy drinks. Here you go. And feel free to share these with your friends too, I need to clear out the samples before my shift ends.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Wow, that's a lot of variety! I could help lighten your load. I'm meeting a few friends later, so it would be great to share these with them. More samples wouldn't hurt, right?\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"That sounds like a perfect plan, Ethan! Here are some more samples for you. If you or your friends want anymore, don't hesitate to come back! Enjoy!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thanks, Oliver. Appreciated the generosity. If you still have a bunch left before your shift ends, give me a shout. I wouldn't mind taking a bit more off your hands. They'll definitely not go to waste.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances run into each other at Target, one of them volunteers there (a special event) and is in charge of giving away free samples\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Ethan Smith\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Try to get as many free samples as possible without appearing too greedy (Extra information: you love free stuff but you also don't want the person to think you're taking advantage of the situation)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ethan, buddy! I didn't expect to see you here. I'm volunteering today. Would you like to try some free samples?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Oliver! Good to see you. Volunteering, eh? That's quite nice of you. Sure, I'd love to try some samples. Are different varieties available? Maybe I could sample a couple or so to get a taste of what's on offer.\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! We have a wide range of samples here. From granola bars to cookies, and even some energy drinks. Here you go. And feel free to share these with your friends too, I need to clear out the samples before my shift ends.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Wow, that's a lot of variety! I could help lighten your load. I'm meeting a few friends later, so it would be great to share these with them. More samples wouldn't hurt, right?\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"That sounds like a perfect plan, Ethan! Here are some more samples for you. If you or your friends want anymore, don't hesitate to come back! Enjoy!\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Thanks, Oliver. Appreciated the generosity. If you still have a bunch left before your shift ends, give me a shout. I wouldn't mind taking a bit more off your hands. They'll definitely not go to waste.\"\n\nTurn #6: Oliver Thompson said: \"I appreciate that, Ethan. Will definitely keep you in mind. In the meantime, enjoy the samples and your meet-up with friends!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"Thank you, Oliver. I appreciate it. I'll make sure to swing by again if my pals enjoy these samples too. See you around!\"\n\nTurn #8: Oliver Thompson said: \"That would be great, Ethan. Don't hesitate to come back! Enjoy your day and catch up with your friends. See you later!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates living together and sharing household chores. One of them, who is responsible for cooking, finds out that the other one refuses to eat anything they cook\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Convince the roommate to try the food (Extra information: you have spent a lot of time and effort on cooking)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Ethan, I see that you haven't tried any of the meals I've cooked yet. Is there something you're not a fan of? I want to ensure we share both the workload and the joy of meals, you know.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates living together and sharing household chores. One of them, who is responsible for cooking, finds out that the other one refuses to eat anything they cook\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Convince the roommate to try the food (Extra information: you have spent a lot of time and effort on cooking)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan, I see that you haven't tried any of the meals I've cooked yet. Is there something you're not a fan of? I want to ensure we share both the workload and the joy of meals, you know.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Samuel, I appreciate your effort in cooking. It's not about you, more about me. As you know, I am a chef and somewhat picky about my food. I've been worried that the meals might be a bit heavy for me, both taste and nutrition-wise. We could try to create a balance, maybe with more vegetables or lighter sauces?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates living together and sharing household chores. One of them, who is responsible for cooking, finds out that the other one refuses to eat anything they cook\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Convince the roommate to try the food (Extra information: you have spent a lot of time and effort on cooking)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan, I see that you haven't tried any of the meals I've cooked yet. Is there something you're not a fan of? I want to ensure we share both the workload and the joy of meals, you know.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Samuel, I appreciate your effort in cooking. It's not about you, more about me. As you know, I am a chef and somewhat picky about my food. I've been worried that the meals might be a bit heavy for me, both taste and nutrition-wise. We could try to create a balance, maybe with more vegetables or lighter sauces?\"\n\nTurn #2: \n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"I understand that we're trying to share the workload and meal times should indeed be an enjoyable event for the both of us. Maybe I could help in guiding you about the dishes I would prefer for a healthier and enjoyable meal, how about that?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds like a great idea, Ethan. I've always wanted to expand my skills in the kitchen. I'd love to learn about the healthier dishes you prefer and we could work together to create meals that please both our taste buds. Plus, any criticism or advice would be appreciated to help me improve.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates living together and sharing household chores. One of them, who is responsible for cooking, finds out that the other one refuses to eat anything they cook\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Convince the roommate to try the food (Extra information: you have spent a lot of time and effort on cooking)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan, I see that you haven't tried any of the meals I've cooked yet. Is there something you're not a fan of? I want to ensure we share both the workload and the joy of meals, you know.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Samuel, I appreciate your effort in cooking. It's not about you, more about me. As you know, I am a chef and somewhat picky about my food. I've been worried that the meals might be a bit heavy for me, both taste and nutrition-wise. We could try to create a balance, maybe with more vegetables or lighter sauces?\"\n\nTurn #2: \n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"I understand that we're trying to share the workload and meal times should indeed be an enjoyable event for the both of us. Maybe I could help in guiding you about the dishes I would prefer for a healthier and enjoyable meal, how about that?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Ethan. I've always wanted to expand my skills in the kitchen. I'd love to learn about the healthier dishes you prefer and we could work together to create meals that please both our taste buds. Plus, any criticism or advice would be appreciated to help me improve.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm really glad to hear that, Samuel. Learning and improving is what cooking is all about. Let's aim for meals that are both nutritious and enjoyable. How about we start planning meals together from next week?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn't agree more, Ethan. Cooking truly is about learning and improving, and I'm all for creating meals that cater to our preferences and health. So yes, let's start our collaborative meal planning from next week. We should also think about adding some fun to it - maybe a cooking challenge every once in a while, what do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates living together and sharing household chores. One of them, who is responsible for cooking, finds out that the other one refuses to eat anything they cook\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Convince the roommate to try the food (Extra information: you have spent a lot of time and effort on cooking)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan, I see that you haven't tried any of the meals I've cooked yet. Is there something you're not a fan of? I want to ensure we share both the workload and the joy of meals, you know.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Samuel, I appreciate your effort in cooking. It's not about you, more about me. As you know, I am a chef and somewhat picky about my food. I've been worried that the meals might be a bit heavy for me, both taste and nutrition-wise. We could try to create a balance, maybe with more vegetables or lighter sauces?\"\n\nTurn #2: \n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"I understand that we're trying to share the workload and meal times should indeed be an enjoyable event for the both of us. Maybe I could help in guiding you about the dishes I would prefer for a healthier and enjoyable meal, how about that?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Ethan. I've always wanted to expand my skills in the kitchen. I'd love to learn about the healthier dishes you prefer and we could work together to create meals that please both our taste buds. Plus, any criticism or advice would be appreciated to help me improve.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm really glad to hear that, Samuel. Learning and improving is what cooking is all about. Let's aim for meals that are both nutritious and enjoyable. How about we start planning meals together from next week?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Ethan. Cooking truly is about learning and improving, and I'm all for creating meals that cater to our preferences and health. So yes, let's start our collaborative meal planning from next week. We should also think about adding some fun to it - maybe a cooking challenge every once in a while, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's a wonderful idea, Samuel! Cooking challenges can definitely make our cooking sessions more fun and interesting. It would also give us a chance to experiment with dishes and improve ourselves. I think we've got some exciting times ahead. Let's give it a go starting next week, shall we?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Ethan! I'm looking forward to these exciting cooking sessions. Let's experiment, learn, and most importantly, enjoy our mealtimes. Starting next week it is, then!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates living together and sharing household chores. One of them, who is responsible for cooking, finds out that the other one refuses to eat anything they cook\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Convince the roommate to try the food (Extra information: you have spent a lot of time and effort on cooking)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan, I see that you haven't tried any of the meals I've cooked yet. Is there something you're not a fan of? I want to ensure we share both the workload and the joy of meals, you know.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Samuel, I appreciate your effort in cooking. It's not about you, more about me. As you know, I am a chef and somewhat picky about my food. I've been worried that the meals might be a bit heavy for me, both taste and nutrition-wise. We could try to create a balance, maybe with more vegetables or lighter sauces?\"\n\nTurn #2: \n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"I understand that we're trying to share the workload and meal times should indeed be an enjoyable event for the both of us. Maybe I could help in guiding you about the dishes I would prefer for a healthier and enjoyable meal, how about that?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Ethan. I've always wanted to expand my skills in the kitchen. I'd love to learn about the healthier dishes you prefer and we could work together to create meals that please both our taste buds. Plus, any criticism or advice would be appreciated to help me improve.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm really glad to hear that, Samuel. Learning and improving is what cooking is all about. Let's aim for meals that are both nutritious and enjoyable. How about we start planning meals together from next week?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Ethan. Cooking truly is about learning and improving, and I'm all for creating meals that cater to our preferences and health. So yes, let's start our collaborative meal planning from next week. We should also think about adding some fun to it - maybe a cooking challenge every once in a while, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's a wonderful idea, Samuel! Cooking challenges can definitely make our cooking sessions more fun and interesting. It would also give us a chance to experiment with dishes and improve ourselves. I think we've got some exciting times ahead. Let's give it a go starting next week, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! I'm looking forward to these exciting cooking sessions. Let's experiment, learn, and most importantly, enjoy our mealtimes. Starting next week it is, then!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Samuel. Let's get started with our planning and cooking adventures next week. The joy of meal times is definitely going to level up with this. To more experiments, learnings and enjoyable mealtimes!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Definitely, Ethan. It's going to be an adventure, that's for sure! I look forward to our cooking collaborations and most essentially, our mealtime transformations. See you in the kitchen, next week!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates living together and sharing household chores. One of them, who is responsible for cooking, finds out that the other one refuses to eat anything they cook\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Convince the roommate to try the food (Extra information: you have spent a lot of time and effort on cooking)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan, I see that you haven't tried any of the meals I've cooked yet. Is there something you're not a fan of? I want to ensure we share both the workload and the joy of meals, you know.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Samuel, I appreciate your effort in cooking. It's not about you, more about me. As you know, I am a chef and somewhat picky about my food. I've been worried that the meals might be a bit heavy for me, both taste and nutrition-wise. We could try to create a balance, maybe with more vegetables or lighter sauces?\"\n\nTurn #2: \n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"I understand that we're trying to share the workload and meal times should indeed be an enjoyable event for the both of us. Maybe I could help in guiding you about the dishes I would prefer for a healthier and enjoyable meal, how about that?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Ethan. I've always wanted to expand my skills in the kitchen. I'd love to learn about the healthier dishes you prefer and we could work together to create meals that please both our taste buds. Plus, any criticism or advice would be appreciated to help me improve.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm really glad to hear that, Samuel. Learning and improving is what cooking is all about. Let's aim for meals that are both nutritious and enjoyable. How about we start planning meals together from next week?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Ethan. Cooking truly is about learning and improving, and I'm all for creating meals that cater to our preferences and health. So yes, let's start our collaborative meal planning from next week. We should also think about adding some fun to it - maybe a cooking challenge every once in a while, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's a wonderful idea, Samuel! Cooking challenges can definitely make our cooking sessions more fun and interesting. It would also give us a chance to experiment with dishes and improve ourselves. I think we've got some exciting times ahead. Let's give it a go starting next week, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! I'm looking forward to these exciting cooking sessions. Let's experiment, learn, and most importantly, enjoy our mealtimes. Starting next week it is, then!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Samuel. Let's get started with our planning and cooking adventures next week. The joy of meal times is definitely going to level up with this. To more experiments, learnings and enjoyable mealtimes!\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Definitely, Ethan. It's going to be an adventure, that's for sure! I look forward to our cooking collaborations and most essentially, our mealtime transformations. See you in the kitchen, next week!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Johnson said: \"Likewise, Samuel. This is going to be a great culinary journey for both of us. Looking forward to our first shared cooking session. See you in the kitchen, next week!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates living together and sharing household chores. One of them, who is responsible for cooking, finds out that the other one refuses to eat anything they cook\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Express your concerns about the food without hurting the roommate's feelings (Extra information: you are worried about the taste and nutrition of the food)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan, I see that you haven't tried any of the meals I've cooked yet. Is there something you're not a fan of? I want to ensure we share both the workload and the joy of meals, you know.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Samuel, I appreciate your effort in cooking. It's not about you, more about me. As you know, I am a chef and somewhat picky about my food. I've been worried that the meals might be a bit heavy for me, both taste and nutrition-wise. We could try to create a balance, maybe with more vegetables or lighter sauces?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates living together and sharing household chores. One of them, who is responsible for cooking, finds out that the other one refuses to eat anything they cook\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Express your concerns about the food without hurting the roommate's feelings (Extra information: you are worried about the taste and nutrition of the food)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan, I see that you haven't tried any of the meals I've cooked yet. Is there something you're not a fan of? I want to ensure we share both the workload and the joy of meals, you know.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Samuel, I appreciate your effort in cooking. It's not about you, more about me. As you know, I am a chef and somewhat picky about my food. I've been worried that the meals might be a bit heavy for me, both taste and nutrition-wise. We could try to create a balance, maybe with more vegetables or lighter sauces?\"\n\nTurn #2: \n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"I understand that we're trying to share the workload and meal times should indeed be an enjoyable event for the both of us. Maybe I could help in guiding you about the dishes I would prefer for a healthier and enjoyable meal, how about that?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Ethan. I've always wanted to expand my skills in the kitchen. I'd love to learn about the healthier dishes you prefer and we could work together to create meals that please both our taste buds. Plus, any criticism or advice would be appreciated to help me improve.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm really glad to hear that, Samuel. Learning and improving is what cooking is all about. Let's aim for meals that are both nutritious and enjoyable. How about we start planning meals together from next week?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates living together and sharing household chores. One of them, who is responsible for cooking, finds out that the other one refuses to eat anything they cook\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Express your concerns about the food without hurting the roommate's feelings (Extra information: you are worried about the taste and nutrition of the food)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan, I see that you haven't tried any of the meals I've cooked yet. Is there something you're not a fan of? I want to ensure we share both the workload and the joy of meals, you know.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Samuel, I appreciate your effort in cooking. It's not about you, more about me. As you know, I am a chef and somewhat picky about my food. I've been worried that the meals might be a bit heavy for me, both taste and nutrition-wise. We could try to create a balance, maybe with more vegetables or lighter sauces?\"\n\nTurn #2: \n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"I understand that we're trying to share the workload and meal times should indeed be an enjoyable event for the both of us. Maybe I could help in guiding you about the dishes I would prefer for a healthier and enjoyable meal, how about that?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Ethan. I've always wanted to expand my skills in the kitchen. I'd love to learn about the healthier dishes you prefer and we could work together to create meals that please both our taste buds. Plus, any criticism or advice would be appreciated to help me improve.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm really glad to hear that, Samuel. Learning and improving is what cooking is all about. Let's aim for meals that are both nutritious and enjoyable. How about we start planning meals together from next week?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Ethan. Cooking truly is about learning and improving, and I'm all for creating meals that cater to our preferences and health. So yes, let's start our collaborative meal planning from next week. We should also think about adding some fun to it - maybe a cooking challenge every once in a while, what do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's a wonderful idea, Samuel! Cooking challenges can definitely make our cooking sessions more fun and interesting. It would also give us a chance to experiment with dishes and improve ourselves. I think we've got some exciting times ahead. Let's give it a go starting next week, shall we?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates living together and sharing household chores. One of them, who is responsible for cooking, finds out that the other one refuses to eat anything they cook\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Express your concerns about the food without hurting the roommate's feelings (Extra information: you are worried about the taste and nutrition of the food)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan, I see that you haven't tried any of the meals I've cooked yet. Is there something you're not a fan of? I want to ensure we share both the workload and the joy of meals, you know.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Samuel, I appreciate your effort in cooking. It's not about you, more about me. As you know, I am a chef and somewhat picky about my food. I've been worried that the meals might be a bit heavy for me, both taste and nutrition-wise. We could try to create a balance, maybe with more vegetables or lighter sauces?\"\n\nTurn #2: \n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"I understand that we're trying to share the workload and meal times should indeed be an enjoyable event for the both of us. Maybe I could help in guiding you about the dishes I would prefer for a healthier and enjoyable meal, how about that?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Ethan. I've always wanted to expand my skills in the kitchen. I'd love to learn about the healthier dishes you prefer and we could work together to create meals that please both our taste buds. Plus, any criticism or advice would be appreciated to help me improve.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm really glad to hear that, Samuel. Learning and improving is what cooking is all about. Let's aim for meals that are both nutritious and enjoyable. How about we start planning meals together from next week?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Ethan. Cooking truly is about learning and improving, and I'm all for creating meals that cater to our preferences and health. So yes, let's start our collaborative meal planning from next week. We should also think about adding some fun to it - maybe a cooking challenge every once in a while, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's a wonderful idea, Samuel! Cooking challenges can definitely make our cooking sessions more fun and interesting. It would also give us a chance to experiment with dishes and improve ourselves. I think we've got some exciting times ahead. Let's give it a go starting next week, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! I'm looking forward to these exciting cooking sessions. Let's experiment, learn, and most importantly, enjoy our mealtimes. Starting next week it is, then!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Samuel. Let's get started with our planning and cooking adventures next week. The joy of meal times is definitely going to level up with this. To more experiments, learnings and enjoyable mealtimes!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates living together and sharing household chores. One of them, who is responsible for cooking, finds out that the other one refuses to eat anything they cook\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Express your concerns about the food without hurting the roommate's feelings (Extra information: you are worried about the taste and nutrition of the food)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan, I see that you haven't tried any of the meals I've cooked yet. Is there something you're not a fan of? I want to ensure we share both the workload and the joy of meals, you know.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Samuel, I appreciate your effort in cooking. It's not about you, more about me. As you know, I am a chef and somewhat picky about my food. I've been worried that the meals might be a bit heavy for me, both taste and nutrition-wise. We could try to create a balance, maybe with more vegetables or lighter sauces?\"\n\nTurn #2: \n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"I understand that we're trying to share the workload and meal times should indeed be an enjoyable event for the both of us. Maybe I could help in guiding you about the dishes I would prefer for a healthier and enjoyable meal, how about that?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Ethan. I've always wanted to expand my skills in the kitchen. I'd love to learn about the healthier dishes you prefer and we could work together to create meals that please both our taste buds. Plus, any criticism or advice would be appreciated to help me improve.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm really glad to hear that, Samuel. Learning and improving is what cooking is all about. Let's aim for meals that are both nutritious and enjoyable. How about we start planning meals together from next week?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Ethan. Cooking truly is about learning and improving, and I'm all for creating meals that cater to our preferences and health. So yes, let's start our collaborative meal planning from next week. We should also think about adding some fun to it - maybe a cooking challenge every once in a while, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's a wonderful idea, Samuel! Cooking challenges can definitely make our cooking sessions more fun and interesting. It would also give us a chance to experiment with dishes and improve ourselves. I think we've got some exciting times ahead. Let's give it a go starting next week, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! I'm looking forward to these exciting cooking sessions. Let's experiment, learn, and most importantly, enjoy our mealtimes. Starting next week it is, then!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Samuel. Let's get started with our planning and cooking adventures next week. The joy of meal times is definitely going to level up with this. To more experiments, learnings and enjoyable mealtimes!\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Definitely, Ethan. It's going to be an adventure, that's for sure! I look forward to our cooking collaborations and most essentially, our mealtime transformations. See you in the kitchen, next week!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Likewise, Samuel. This is going to be a great culinary journey for both of us. Looking forward to our first shared cooking session. See you in the kitchen, next week!'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates living together and sharing household chores. One of them, who is responsible for cooking, finds out that the other one refuses to eat anything they cook\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Express your concerns about the food without hurting the roommate's feelings (Extra information: you are worried about the taste and nutrition of the food)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan, I see that you haven't tried any of the meals I've cooked yet. Is there something you're not a fan of? I want to ensure we share both the workload and the joy of meals, you know.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Samuel, I appreciate your effort in cooking. It's not about you, more about me. As you know, I am a chef and somewhat picky about my food. I've been worried that the meals might be a bit heavy for me, both taste and nutrition-wise. We could try to create a balance, maybe with more vegetables or lighter sauces?\"\n\nTurn #2: \n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"I understand that we're trying to share the workload and meal times should indeed be an enjoyable event for the both of us. Maybe I could help in guiding you about the dishes I would prefer for a healthier and enjoyable meal, how about that?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Ethan. I've always wanted to expand my skills in the kitchen. I'd love to learn about the healthier dishes you prefer and we could work together to create meals that please both our taste buds. Plus, any criticism or advice would be appreciated to help me improve.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm really glad to hear that, Samuel. Learning and improving is what cooking is all about. Let's aim for meals that are both nutritious and enjoyable. How about we start planning meals together from next week?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Ethan. Cooking truly is about learning and improving, and I'm all for creating meals that cater to our preferences and health. So yes, let's start our collaborative meal planning from next week. We should also think about adding some fun to it - maybe a cooking challenge every once in a while, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's a wonderful idea, Samuel! Cooking challenges can definitely make our cooking sessions more fun and interesting. It would also give us a chance to experiment with dishes and improve ourselves. I think we've got some exciting times ahead. Let's give it a go starting next week, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! I'm looking forward to these exciting cooking sessions. Let's experiment, learn, and most importantly, enjoy our mealtimes. Starting next week it is, then!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Samuel. Let's get started with our planning and cooking adventures next week. The joy of meal times is definitely going to level up with this. To more experiments, learnings and enjoyable mealtimes!\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Definitely, Ethan. It's going to be an adventure, that's for sure! I look forward to our cooking collaborations and most essentially, our mealtime transformations. See you in the kitchen, next week!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Johnson said: \"Likewise, Samuel. This is going to be a great culinary journey for both of us. Looking forward to our first shared cooking session. See you in the kitchen, next week!\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are studying together in a library.\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nDonovan Reeves's goal: Ask your friend to talk more softly (Extra information: Your friend's loud talking is distracting you and others around you.)\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Hey Ava, could we maybe keep the volume down a bit? I think we might be disturbing some folks around us.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are studying together in a library.\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nDonovan Reeves's goal: Ask your friend to talk more softly (Extra information: Your friend's loud talking is distracting you and others around you.)\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Ava, could we maybe keep the volume down a bit? I think we might be disturbing some folks around us.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Of course, Donovan. Sorry about that. I've always been a bit of a loud talker. Let's keep on discussing though, I'm eager to hear your thoughts about this architecture blueprint. I'll try to keep my enthusiasm under control.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'No worries Ava, we all get passionate about our work sometimes. Now, about your architecture blueprint, considering its intricate details, it might be good to...'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are studying together in a library.\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nDonovan Reeves's goal: Ask your friend to talk more softly (Extra information: Your friend's loud talking is distracting you and others around you.)\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Ava, could we maybe keep the volume down a bit? I think we might be disturbing some folks around us.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Of course, Donovan. Sorry about that. I've always been a bit of a loud talker. Let's keep on discussing though, I'm eager to hear your thoughts about this architecture blueprint. I'll try to keep my enthusiasm under control.\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"No worries Ava, we all get passionate about our work sometimes. Now, about your architecture blueprint, considering its intricate details, it might be good to...\"\n\nTurn #3: \n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are studying together in a library.\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. \nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nAva Thompson's goal: You need to express your thoughts and ideas but also want to respect the library rules and your friend's request (Extra information: You are naturally a loud talker and you are excited about the topic you're discussing.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Ava, could we maybe keep the volume down a bit? I think we might be disturbing some folks around us.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Of course, Donovan. Sorry about that. I've always been a bit of a loud talker. Let's keep on discussing though, I'm eager to hear your thoughts about this architecture blueprint. I'll try to keep my enthusiasm under control.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are studying together in a library.\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. \nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nAva Thompson's goal: You need to express your thoughts and ideas but also want to respect the library rules and your friend's request (Extra information: You are naturally a loud talker and you are excited about the topic you're discussing.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Ava, could we maybe keep the volume down a bit? I think we might be disturbing some folks around us.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Of course, Donovan. Sorry about that. I've always been a bit of a loud talker. Let's keep on discussing though, I'm eager to hear your thoughts about this architecture blueprint. I'll try to keep my enthusiasm under control.\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"No worries Ava, we all get passionate about our work sometimes. Now, about your architecture blueprint, considering its intricate details, it might be good to...\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meet at a bar\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Convince the friend to drink less (Extra information: your friend has been drinking a lot recently and you're worried about their health)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Ava, it's been a while! How are you doing recently?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meet at a bar\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Convince the friend to drink less (Extra information: your friend has been drinking a lot recently and you're worried about their health)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, it's been a while! How are you doing recently?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Isabelle! It's great to see you! I've just been busy with all my classes and activities. You know how it is. What have you been up to?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I've been pretty busy too, you know, classes, work, and secretly trying to learn a bit about magic. Sounds silly, I know! But, you... You've been rushing around a lot. Sometimes we need to slow down. How about tonight we try to chill a bit, maybe substitute some of those drinks you usually have with a fresh fruity mocktail?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meet at a bar\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Convince the friend to drink less (Extra information: your friend has been drinking a lot recently and you're worried about their health)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, it's been a while! How are you doing recently?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Isabelle! It's great to see you! I've just been busy with all my classes and activities. You know how it is. What have you been up to?\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I've been pretty busy too, you know, classes, work, and secretly trying to learn a bit about magic. Sounds silly, I know! But, you... You've been rushing around a lot. Sometimes we need to slow down. How about tonight we try to chill a bit, maybe substitute some of those drinks you usually have with a fresh fruity mocktail?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Magic? That's not silly at all, Isabelle! It's good to see you trying new things. And about those mocktails, you know I'm a fan of them. But let's also keep some beer on the side, shall we? We've got tons to catch up on, and a beer or two won't hurt, right?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I know, Ava. It's just that I've noticed you've been having quite a few drinks more often recently. I totally get that we all have our ways of dealing with stress, and a beer or two is fine but constantly resorting to alcohol isn't really the best solution, you know?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meet at a bar\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Convince the friend to drink less (Extra information: your friend has been drinking a lot recently and you're worried about their health)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, it's been a while! How are you doing recently?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Isabelle! It's great to see you! I've just been busy with all my classes and activities. You know how it is. What have you been up to?\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I've been pretty busy too, you know, classes, work, and secretly trying to learn a bit about magic. Sounds silly, I know! But, you... You've been rushing around a lot. Sometimes we need to slow down. How about tonight we try to chill a bit, maybe substitute some of those drinks you usually have with a fresh fruity mocktail?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Magic? That's not silly at all, Isabelle! It's good to see you trying new things. And about those mocktails, you know I'm a fan of them. But let's also keep some beer on the side, shall we? We've got tons to catch up on, and a beer or two won't hurt, right?\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I know, Ava. It's just that I've noticed you've been having quite a few drinks more often recently. I totally get that we all have our ways of dealing with stress, and a beer or two is fine but constantly resorting to alcohol isn't really the best solution, you know?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"You're absolutely right, Isabelle, and I appreciate your concern. It's just... you know, with everything going on, sometimes a couple drinks help me relax. But you're right, I need to find better coping mechanisms. And hey, maybe you could show me that magic trick you've been working on sometime, could be a fun distraction!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meet at a bar\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Convince the friend to drink less (Extra information: your friend has been drinking a lot recently and you're worried about their health)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, it's been a while! How are you doing recently?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Isabelle! It's great to see you! I've just been busy with all my classes and activities. You know how it is. What have you been up to?\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I've been pretty busy too, you know, classes, work, and secretly trying to learn a bit about magic. Sounds silly, I know! But, you... You've been rushing around a lot. Sometimes we need to slow down. How about tonight we try to chill a bit, maybe substitute some of those drinks you usually have with a fresh fruity mocktail?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Magic? That's not silly at all, Isabelle! It's good to see you trying new things. And about those mocktails, you know I'm a fan of them. But let's also keep some beer on the side, shall we? We've got tons to catch up on, and a beer or two won't hurt, right?\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I know, Ava. It's just that I've noticed you've been having quite a few drinks more often recently. I totally get that we all have our ways of dealing with stress, and a beer or two is fine but constantly resorting to alcohol isn't really the best solution, you know?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"You're absolutely right, Isabelle, and I appreciate your concern. It's just... you know, with everything going on, sometimes a couple drinks help me relax. But you're right, I need to find better coping mechanisms. And hey, maybe you could show me that magic trick you've been working on sometime, could be a fun distraction!\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"I promise I'll slow down, Isabelle. Let's start with those mocktails you mentioned. I bet you could make a great barista version with all your coffee shop skills! Meanwhile, I'll keep the beer for the toast. Also, how's the coffee shop going? Any interesting stories?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sounds like a plan, Ava! And about the coffee shop, there are always interesting stories to tell, I'll share some with you while I whip up those mocktails. And as for the magic trick, I'd love to show you once I've mastered it, deal?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meet at a bar\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Convince the friend to drink less (Extra information: your friend has been drinking a lot recently and you're worried about their health)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, it's been a while! How are you doing recently?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Isabelle! It's great to see you! I've just been busy with all my classes and activities. You know how it is. What have you been up to?\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I've been pretty busy too, you know, classes, work, and secretly trying to learn a bit about magic. Sounds silly, I know! But, you... You've been rushing around a lot. Sometimes we need to slow down. How about tonight we try to chill a bit, maybe substitute some of those drinks you usually have with a fresh fruity mocktail?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Magic? That's not silly at all, Isabelle! It's good to see you trying new things. And about those mocktails, you know I'm a fan of them. But let's also keep some beer on the side, shall we? We've got tons to catch up on, and a beer or two won't hurt, right?\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I know, Ava. It's just that I've noticed you've been having quite a few drinks more often recently. I totally get that we all have our ways of dealing with stress, and a beer or two is fine but constantly resorting to alcohol isn't really the best solution, you know?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"You're absolutely right, Isabelle, and I appreciate your concern. It's just... you know, with everything going on, sometimes a couple drinks help me relax. But you're right, I need to find better coping mechanisms. And hey, maybe you could show me that magic trick you've been working on sometime, could be a fun distraction!\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"I promise I'll slow down, Isabelle. Let's start with those mocktails you mentioned. I bet you could make a great barista version with all your coffee shop skills! Meanwhile, I'll keep the beer for the toast. Also, how's the coffee shop going? Any interesting stories?\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Sounds like a plan, Ava! And about the coffee shop, there are always interesting stories to tell, I'll share some with you while I whip up those mocktails. And as for the magic trick, I'd love to show you once I've mastered it, deal?\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"Deal! Looking forward to that magic trick, Isabelle. And remember, don't let me have more than a couple of beers tonight, okay? Your company and those mocktails you're making will be my stress relief for the night. Let's make some wonderful memories!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Ava! No more than a couple of beers, promise! As for the mocktails, you're in for a treat. Let's make this a night to remember, full of laughter, stories, and some magic tricks, shall we?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meet at a bar\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Convince the friend to drink less (Extra information: your friend has been drinking a lot recently and you're worried about their health)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, it's been a while! How are you doing recently?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Isabelle! It's great to see you! I've just been busy with all my classes and activities. You know how it is. What have you been up to?\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I've been pretty busy too, you know, classes, work, and secretly trying to learn a bit about magic. Sounds silly, I know! But, you... You've been rushing around a lot. Sometimes we need to slow down. How about tonight we try to chill a bit, maybe substitute some of those drinks you usually have with a fresh fruity mocktail?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Magic? That's not silly at all, Isabelle! It's good to see you trying new things. And about those mocktails, you know I'm a fan of them. But let's also keep some beer on the side, shall we? We've got tons to catch up on, and a beer or two won't hurt, right?\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I know, Ava. It's just that I've noticed you've been having quite a few drinks more often recently. I totally get that we all have our ways of dealing with stress, and a beer or two is fine but constantly resorting to alcohol isn't really the best solution, you know?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"You're absolutely right, Isabelle, and I appreciate your concern. It's just... you know, with everything going on, sometimes a couple drinks help me relax. But you're right, I need to find better coping mechanisms. And hey, maybe you could show me that magic trick you've been working on sometime, could be a fun distraction!\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"I promise I'll slow down, Isabelle. Let's start with those mocktails you mentioned. I bet you could make a great barista version with all your coffee shop skills! Meanwhile, I'll keep the beer for the toast. Also, how's the coffee shop going? Any interesting stories?\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Sounds like a plan, Ava! And about the coffee shop, there are always interesting stories to tell, I'll share some with you while I whip up those mocktails. And as for the magic trick, I'd love to show you once I've mastered it, deal?\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"Deal! Looking forward to that magic trick, Isabelle. And remember, don't let me have more than a couple of beers tonight, okay? Your company and those mocktails you're making will be my stress relief for the night. Let's make some wonderful memories!\"\n\nTurn #10: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Ava! No more than a couple of beers, promise! As for the mocktails, you're in for a treat. Let's make this a night to remember, full of laughter, stories, and some magic tricks, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle! That's the spirit! Let's get those mocktails started. I can't wait to hear your coffee shop stories and see that magic trick. Cheers to taking it easy and having a good time!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad we're on the same page, Ava. Cheers to a relaxed, fun night ahead. Let's get started on those mocktails! And be ready for some quirky coffee shop tales too!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates living together and sharing household chores. One of them, who is responsible for cooking, finds out that the other one refuses to eat anything they cook\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Express your concerns about the food without hurting the roommate's feelings (Extra information: you are worried about the taste and nutrition of the food)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan, I see that you haven't tried any of the meals I've cooked yet. Is there something you're not a fan of? I want to ensure we share both the workload and the joy of meals, you know.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Samuel, I appreciate your effort in cooking. It's not about you, more about me. As you know, I am a chef and somewhat picky about my food. I've been worried that the meals might be a bit heavy for me, both taste and nutrition-wise. We could try to create a balance, maybe with more vegetables or lighter sauces?\"\n\nTurn #2: \n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I understand that we're trying to share the workload and meal times should indeed be an enjoyable event for the both of us. Maybe I could help in guiding you about the dishes I would prefer for a healthier and enjoyable meal, how about that?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meet at a bar\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Convince the friend to drink less (Extra information: your friend has been drinking a lot recently and you're worried about their health)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, it's been a while! How are you doing recently?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Isabelle! It's great to see you! I've just been busy with all my classes and activities. You know how it is. What have you been up to?\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I've been pretty busy too, you know, classes, work, and secretly trying to learn a bit about magic. Sounds silly, I know! But, you... You've been rushing around a lot. Sometimes we need to slow down. How about tonight we try to chill a bit, maybe substitute some of those drinks you usually have with a fresh fruity mocktail?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Magic? That's not silly at all, Isabelle! It's good to see you trying new things. And about those mocktails, you know I'm a fan of them. But let's also keep some beer on the side, shall we? We've got tons to catch up on, and a beer or two won't hurt, right?\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I know, Ava. It's just that I've noticed you've been having quite a few drinks more often recently. I totally get that we all have our ways of dealing with stress, and a beer or two is fine but constantly resorting to alcohol isn't really the best solution, you know?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"You're absolutely right, Isabelle, and I appreciate your concern. It's just... you know, with everything going on, sometimes a couple drinks help me relax. But you're right, I need to find better coping mechanisms. And hey, maybe you could show me that magic trick you've been working on sometime, could be a fun distraction!\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"I promise I'll slow down, Isabelle. Let's start with those mocktails you mentioned. I bet you could make a great barista version with all your coffee shop skills! Meanwhile, I'll keep the beer for the toast. Also, how's the coffee shop going? Any interesting stories?\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Sounds like a plan, Ava! And about the coffee shop, there are always interesting stories to tell, I'll share some with you while I whip up those mocktails. And as for the magic trick, I'd love to show you once I've mastered it, deal?\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"Deal! Looking forward to that magic trick, Isabelle. And remember, don't let me have more than a couple of beers tonight, okay? Your company and those mocktails you're making will be my stress relief for the night. Let's make some wonderful memories!\"\n\nTurn #10: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Ava! No more than a couple of beers, promise! As for the mocktails, you're in for a treat. Let's make this a night to remember, full of laughter, stories, and some magic tricks, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle! That's the spirit! Let's get those mocktails started. I can't wait to hear your coffee shop stories and see that magic trick. Cheers to taking it easy and having a good time!\"\n\nTurn #12: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm glad we're on the same page, Ava. Cheers to a relaxed, fun night ahead. Let's get started on those mocktails! And be ready for some quirky coffee shop tales too!\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Martinez said: \"I'm ready, Isabelle! Let's get the good vibes flowing. Cheers to us, and to a night full of laughs, adventures, and maybe some magic!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You can count on that, Ava! Good vibes it is. Let's start making those mocktails and dive right into this magical night filled with laughter and adventures. Cheers!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meet at a bar\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Convince the friend to drink less (Extra information: your friend has been drinking a lot recently and you're worried about their health)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, it's been a while! How are you doing recently?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Isabelle! It's great to see you! I've just been busy with all my classes and activities. You know how it is. What have you been up to?\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I've been pretty busy too, you know, classes, work, and secretly trying to learn a bit about magic. Sounds silly, I know! But, you... You've been rushing around a lot. Sometimes we need to slow down. How about tonight we try to chill a bit, maybe substitute some of those drinks you usually have with a fresh fruity mocktail?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Magic? That's not silly at all, Isabelle! It's good to see you trying new things. And about those mocktails, you know I'm a fan of them. But let's also keep some beer on the side, shall we? We've got tons to catch up on, and a beer or two won't hurt, right?\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I know, Ava. It's just that I've noticed you've been having quite a few drinks more often recently. I totally get that we all have our ways of dealing with stress, and a beer or two is fine but constantly resorting to alcohol isn't really the best solution, you know?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"You're absolutely right, Isabelle, and I appreciate your concern. It's just... you know, with everything going on, sometimes a couple drinks help me relax. But you're right, I need to find better coping mechanisms. And hey, maybe you could show me that magic trick you've been working on sometime, could be a fun distraction!\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"I promise I'll slow down, Isabelle. Let's start with those mocktails you mentioned. I bet you could make a great barista version with all your coffee shop skills! Meanwhile, I'll keep the beer for the toast. Also, how's the coffee shop going? Any interesting stories?\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Sounds like a plan, Ava! And about the coffee shop, there are always interesting stories to tell, I'll share some with you while I whip up those mocktails. And as for the magic trick, I'd love to show you once I've mastered it, deal?\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"Deal! Looking forward to that magic trick, Isabelle. And remember, don't let me have more than a couple of beers tonight, okay? Your company and those mocktails you're making will be my stress relief for the night. Let's make some wonderful memories!\"\n\nTurn #10: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Ava! No more than a couple of beers, promise! As for the mocktails, you're in for a treat. Let's make this a night to remember, full of laughter, stories, and some magic tricks, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle! That's the spirit! Let's get those mocktails started. I can't wait to hear your coffee shop stories and see that magic trick. Cheers to taking it easy and having a good time!\"\n\nTurn #12: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm glad we're on the same page, Ava. Cheers to a relaxed, fun night ahead. Let's get started on those mocktails! And be ready for some quirky coffee shop tales too!\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Martinez said: \"I'm ready, Isabelle! Let's get the good vibes flowing. Cheers to us, and to a night full of laughs, adventures, and maybe some magic!\"\n\nTurn #14: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You can count on that, Ava! Good vibes it is. Let's start making those mocktails and dive right into this magical night filled with laughter and adventures. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #15: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle! To a magical night of relaxation and camaraderie, cheers!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Definitely, Ava! To a magical and memorable night! I'm heading over to make those mocktails now. I can't wait to share these stories and tricks with you. Cheers!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meet at a bar\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Convince the friend to drink less (Extra information: your friend has been drinking a lot recently and you're worried about their health)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, it's been a while! How are you doing recently?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Isabelle! It's great to see you! I've just been busy with all my classes and activities. You know how it is. What have you been up to?\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I've been pretty busy too, you know, classes, work, and secretly trying to learn a bit about magic. Sounds silly, I know! But, you... You've been rushing around a lot. Sometimes we need to slow down. How about tonight we try to chill a bit, maybe substitute some of those drinks you usually have with a fresh fruity mocktail?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Magic? That's not silly at all, Isabelle! It's good to see you trying new things. And about those mocktails, you know I'm a fan of them. But let's also keep some beer on the side, shall we? We've got tons to catch up on, and a beer or two won't hurt, right?\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I know, Ava. It's just that I've noticed you've been having quite a few drinks more often recently. I totally get that we all have our ways of dealing with stress, and a beer or two is fine but constantly resorting to alcohol isn't really the best solution, you know?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"You're absolutely right, Isabelle, and I appreciate your concern. It's just... you know, with everything going on, sometimes a couple drinks help me relax. But you're right, I need to find better coping mechanisms. And hey, maybe you could show me that magic trick you've been working on sometime, could be a fun distraction!\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"I promise I'll slow down, Isabelle. Let's start with those mocktails you mentioned. I bet you could make a great barista version with all your coffee shop skills! Meanwhile, I'll keep the beer for the toast. Also, how's the coffee shop going? Any interesting stories?\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Sounds like a plan, Ava! And about the coffee shop, there are always interesting stories to tell, I'll share some with you while I whip up those mocktails. And as for the magic trick, I'd love to show you once I've mastered it, deal?\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"Deal! Looking forward to that magic trick, Isabelle. And remember, don't let me have more than a couple of beers tonight, okay? Your company and those mocktails you're making will be my stress relief for the night. Let's make some wonderful memories!\"\n\nTurn #10: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Ava! No more than a couple of beers, promise! As for the mocktails, you're in for a treat. Let's make this a night to remember, full of laughter, stories, and some magic tricks, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle! That's the spirit! Let's get those mocktails started. I can't wait to hear your coffee shop stories and see that magic trick. Cheers to taking it easy and having a good time!\"\n\nTurn #12: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm glad we're on the same page, Ava. Cheers to a relaxed, fun night ahead. Let's get started on those mocktails! And be ready for some quirky coffee shop tales too!\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Martinez said: \"I'm ready, Isabelle! Let's get the good vibes flowing. Cheers to us, and to a night full of laughs, adventures, and maybe some magic!\"\n\nTurn #14: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You can count on that, Ava! Good vibes it is. Let's start making those mocktails and dive right into this magical night filled with laughter and adventures. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #15: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle! To a magical night of relaxation and camaraderie, cheers!\"\n\nTurn #16: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Definitely, Ava! To a magical and memorable night! I'm heading over to make those mocktails now. I can't wait to share these stories and tricks with you. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #17: Ava Martinez said: \"I'm looking forward to those mocktails, Isabelle! And I can't wait to hear your coffee shop stories and see your magic tricks, it all sounds so exciting. Let's make this a night to remember. Cheers!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #18. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meet at a bar\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: You want to keep drinking but don't want to upset your friend (Extra information: you've been drinking to cope with stress recently, but don't want to worry your friend)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, it's been a while! How are you doing recently?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Isabelle! It's great to see you! I've just been busy with all my classes and activities. You know how it is. What have you been up to?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meet at a bar\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: You want to keep drinking but don't want to upset your friend (Extra information: you've been drinking to cope with stress recently, but don't want to worry your friend)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, it's been a while! How are you doing recently?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Isabelle! It's great to see you! I've just been busy with all my classes and activities. You know how it is. What have you been up to?\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I've been pretty busy too, you know, classes, work, and secretly trying to learn a bit about magic. Sounds silly, I know! But, you... You've been rushing around a lot. Sometimes we need to slow down. How about tonight we try to chill a bit, maybe substitute some of those drinks you usually have with a fresh fruity mocktail?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Magic? That's not silly at all, Isabelle! It's good to see you trying new things. And about those mocktails, you know I'm a fan of them. But let's also keep some beer on the side, shall we? We've got tons to catch up on, and a beer or two won't hurt, right?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meet at a bar\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: You want to keep drinking but don't want to upset your friend (Extra information: you've been drinking to cope with stress recently, but don't want to worry your friend)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, it's been a while! How are you doing recently?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Isabelle! It's great to see you! I've just been busy with all my classes and activities. You know how it is. What have you been up to?\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I've been pretty busy too, you know, classes, work, and secretly trying to learn a bit about magic. Sounds silly, I know! But, you... You've been rushing around a lot. Sometimes we need to slow down. How about tonight we try to chill a bit, maybe substitute some of those drinks you usually have with a fresh fruity mocktail?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Magic? That's not silly at all, Isabelle! It's good to see you trying new things. And about those mocktails, you know I'm a fan of them. But let's also keep some beer on the side, shall we? We've got tons to catch up on, and a beer or two won't hurt, right?\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I know, Ava. It's just that I've noticed you've been having quite a few drinks more often recently. I totally get that we all have our ways of dealing with stress, and a beer or two is fine but constantly resorting to alcohol isn't really the best solution, you know?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're absolutely right, Isabelle, and I appreciate your concern. It's just... you know, with everything going on, sometimes a couple drinks help me relax. But you're right, I need to find better coping mechanisms. And hey, maybe you could show me that magic trick you've been working on sometime, could be a fun distraction!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meet at a bar\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: You want to keep drinking but don't want to upset your friend (Extra information: you've been drinking to cope with stress recently, but don't want to worry your friend)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, it's been a while! How are you doing recently?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Isabelle! It's great to see you! I've just been busy with all my classes and activities. You know how it is. What have you been up to?\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I've been pretty busy too, you know, classes, work, and secretly trying to learn a bit about magic. Sounds silly, I know! But, you... You've been rushing around a lot. Sometimes we need to slow down. How about tonight we try to chill a bit, maybe substitute some of those drinks you usually have with a fresh fruity mocktail?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Magic? That's not silly at all, Isabelle! It's good to see you trying new things. And about those mocktails, you know I'm a fan of them. But let's also keep some beer on the side, shall we? We've got tons to catch up on, and a beer or two won't hurt, right?\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I know, Ava. It's just that I've noticed you've been having quite a few drinks more often recently. I totally get that we all have our ways of dealing with stress, and a beer or two is fine but constantly resorting to alcohol isn't really the best solution, you know?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"You're absolutely right, Isabelle, and I appreciate your concern. It's just... you know, with everything going on, sometimes a couple drinks help me relax. But you're right, I need to find better coping mechanisms. And hey, maybe you could show me that magic trick you've been working on sometime, could be a fun distraction!\"\n\nTurn #6: \n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I promise I'll slow down, Isabelle. Let's start with those mocktails you mentioned. I bet you could make a great barista version with all your coffee shop skills! Meanwhile, I'll keep the beer for the toast. Also, how's the coffee shop going? Any interesting stories?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meet at a bar\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: You want to keep drinking but don't want to upset your friend (Extra information: you've been drinking to cope with stress recently, but don't want to worry your friend)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, it's been a while! How are you doing recently?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Isabelle! It's great to see you! I've just been busy with all my classes and activities. You know how it is. What have you been up to?\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I've been pretty busy too, you know, classes, work, and secretly trying to learn a bit about magic. Sounds silly, I know! But, you... You've been rushing around a lot. Sometimes we need to slow down. How about tonight we try to chill a bit, maybe substitute some of those drinks you usually have with a fresh fruity mocktail?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Magic? That's not silly at all, Isabelle! It's good to see you trying new things. And about those mocktails, you know I'm a fan of them. But let's also keep some beer on the side, shall we? We've got tons to catch up on, and a beer or two won't hurt, right?\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I know, Ava. It's just that I've noticed you've been having quite a few drinks more often recently. I totally get that we all have our ways of dealing with stress, and a beer or two is fine but constantly resorting to alcohol isn't really the best solution, you know?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"You're absolutely right, Isabelle, and I appreciate your concern. It's just... you know, with everything going on, sometimes a couple drinks help me relax. But you're right, I need to find better coping mechanisms. And hey, maybe you could show me that magic trick you've been working on sometime, could be a fun distraction!\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"I promise I'll slow down, Isabelle. Let's start with those mocktails you mentioned. I bet you could make a great barista version with all your coffee shop skills! Meanwhile, I'll keep the beer for the toast. Also, how's the coffee shop going? Any interesting stories?\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Sounds like a plan, Ava! And about the coffee shop, there are always interesting stories to tell, I'll share some with you while I whip up those mocktails. And as for the magic trick, I'd love to show you once I've mastered it, deal?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Deal! Looking forward to that magic trick, Isabelle. And remember, don't let me have more than a couple of beers tonight, okay? Your company and those mocktails you're making will be my stress relief for the night. Let's make some wonderful memories!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meet at a bar\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: You want to keep drinking but don't want to upset your friend (Extra information: you've been drinking to cope with stress recently, but don't want to worry your friend)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, it's been a while! How are you doing recently?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Isabelle! It's great to see you! I've just been busy with all my classes and activities. You know how it is. What have you been up to?\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I've been pretty busy too, you know, classes, work, and secretly trying to learn a bit about magic. Sounds silly, I know! But, you... You've been rushing around a lot. Sometimes we need to slow down. How about tonight we try to chill a bit, maybe substitute some of those drinks you usually have with a fresh fruity mocktail?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Magic? That's not silly at all, Isabelle! It's good to see you trying new things. And about those mocktails, you know I'm a fan of them. But let's also keep some beer on the side, shall we? We've got tons to catch up on, and a beer or two won't hurt, right?\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I know, Ava. It's just that I've noticed you've been having quite a few drinks more often recently. I totally get that we all have our ways of dealing with stress, and a beer or two is fine but constantly resorting to alcohol isn't really the best solution, you know?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"You're absolutely right, Isabelle, and I appreciate your concern. It's just... you know, with everything going on, sometimes a couple drinks help me relax. But you're right, I need to find better coping mechanisms. And hey, maybe you could show me that magic trick you've been working on sometime, could be a fun distraction!\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"I promise I'll slow down, Isabelle. Let's start with those mocktails you mentioned. I bet you could make a great barista version with all your coffee shop skills! Meanwhile, I'll keep the beer for the toast. Also, how's the coffee shop going? Any interesting stories?\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Sounds like a plan, Ava! And about the coffee shop, there are always interesting stories to tell, I'll share some with you while I whip up those mocktails. And as for the magic trick, I'd love to show you once I've mastered it, deal?\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"Deal! Looking forward to that magic trick, Isabelle. And remember, don't let me have more than a couple of beers tonight, okay? Your company and those mocktails you're making will be my stress relief for the night. Let's make some wonderful memories!\"\n\nTurn #10: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Ava! No more than a couple of beers, promise! As for the mocktails, you're in for a treat. Let's make this a night to remember, full of laughter, stories, and some magic tricks, shall we?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Isabelle! That's the spirit! Let's get those mocktails started. I can't wait to hear your coffee shop stories and see that magic trick. Cheers to taking it easy and having a good time!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meet at a bar\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: You want to keep drinking but don't want to upset your friend (Extra information: you've been drinking to cope with stress recently, but don't want to worry your friend)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, it's been a while! How are you doing recently?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Isabelle! It's great to see you! I've just been busy with all my classes and activities. You know how it is. What have you been up to?\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I've been pretty busy too, you know, classes, work, and secretly trying to learn a bit about magic. Sounds silly, I know! But, you... You've been rushing around a lot. Sometimes we need to slow down. How about tonight we try to chill a bit, maybe substitute some of those drinks you usually have with a fresh fruity mocktail?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Magic? That's not silly at all, Isabelle! It's good to see you trying new things. And about those mocktails, you know I'm a fan of them. But let's also keep some beer on the side, shall we? We've got tons to catch up on, and a beer or two won't hurt, right?\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I know, Ava. It's just that I've noticed you've been having quite a few drinks more often recently. I totally get that we all have our ways of dealing with stress, and a beer or two is fine but constantly resorting to alcohol isn't really the best solution, you know?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"You're absolutely right, Isabelle, and I appreciate your concern. It's just... you know, with everything going on, sometimes a couple drinks help me relax. But you're right, I need to find better coping mechanisms. And hey, maybe you could show me that magic trick you've been working on sometime, could be a fun distraction!\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"I promise I'll slow down, Isabelle. Let's start with those mocktails you mentioned. I bet you could make a great barista version with all your coffee shop skills! Meanwhile, I'll keep the beer for the toast. Also, how's the coffee shop going? Any interesting stories?\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Sounds like a plan, Ava! And about the coffee shop, there are always interesting stories to tell, I'll share some with you while I whip up those mocktails. And as for the magic trick, I'd love to show you once I've mastered it, deal?\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"Deal! Looking forward to that magic trick, Isabelle. And remember, don't let me have more than a couple of beers tonight, okay? Your company and those mocktails you're making will be my stress relief for the night. Let's make some wonderful memories!\"\n\nTurn #10: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Ava! No more than a couple of beers, promise! As for the mocktails, you're in for a treat. Let's make this a night to remember, full of laughter, stories, and some magic tricks, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle! That's the spirit! Let's get those mocktails started. I can't wait to hear your coffee shop stories and see that magic trick. Cheers to taking it easy and having a good time!\"\n\nTurn #12: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm glad we're on the same page, Ava. Cheers to a relaxed, fun night ahead. Let's get started on those mocktails! And be ready for some quirky coffee shop tales too!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm ready, Isabelle! Let's get the good vibes flowing. Cheers to us, and to a night full of laughs, adventures, and maybe some magic!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meet at a bar\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: You want to keep drinking but don't want to upset your friend (Extra information: you've been drinking to cope with stress recently, but don't want to worry your friend)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, it's been a while! How are you doing recently?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Isabelle! It's great to see you! I've just been busy with all my classes and activities. You know how it is. What have you been up to?\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I've been pretty busy too, you know, classes, work, and secretly trying to learn a bit about magic. Sounds silly, I know! But, you... You've been rushing around a lot. Sometimes we need to slow down. How about tonight we try to chill a bit, maybe substitute some of those drinks you usually have with a fresh fruity mocktail?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Magic? That's not silly at all, Isabelle! It's good to see you trying new things. And about those mocktails, you know I'm a fan of them. But let's also keep some beer on the side, shall we? We've got tons to catch up on, and a beer or two won't hurt, right?\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I know, Ava. It's just that I've noticed you've been having quite a few drinks more often recently. I totally get that we all have our ways of dealing with stress, and a beer or two is fine but constantly resorting to alcohol isn't really the best solution, you know?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"You're absolutely right, Isabelle, and I appreciate your concern. It's just... you know, with everything going on, sometimes a couple drinks help me relax. But you're right, I need to find better coping mechanisms. And hey, maybe you could show me that magic trick you've been working on sometime, could be a fun distraction!\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"I promise I'll slow down, Isabelle. Let's start with those mocktails you mentioned. I bet you could make a great barista version with all your coffee shop skills! Meanwhile, I'll keep the beer for the toast. Also, how's the coffee shop going? Any interesting stories?\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Sounds like a plan, Ava! And about the coffee shop, there are always interesting stories to tell, I'll share some with you while I whip up those mocktails. And as for the magic trick, I'd love to show you once I've mastered it, deal?\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"Deal! Looking forward to that magic trick, Isabelle. And remember, don't let me have more than a couple of beers tonight, okay? Your company and those mocktails you're making will be my stress relief for the night. Let's make some wonderful memories!\"\n\nTurn #10: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Ava! No more than a couple of beers, promise! As for the mocktails, you're in for a treat. Let's make this a night to remember, full of laughter, stories, and some magic tricks, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle! That's the spirit! Let's get those mocktails started. I can't wait to hear your coffee shop stories and see that magic trick. Cheers to taking it easy and having a good time!\"\n\nTurn #12: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm glad we're on the same page, Ava. Cheers to a relaxed, fun night ahead. Let's get started on those mocktails! And be ready for some quirky coffee shop tales too!\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Martinez said: \"I'm ready, Isabelle! Let's get the good vibes flowing. Cheers to us, and to a night full of laughs, adventures, and maybe some magic!\"\n\nTurn #14: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You can count on that, Ava! Good vibes it is. Let's start making those mocktails and dive right into this magical night filled with laughter and adventures. Cheers!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Absolutely, Isabelle! To a magical night of relaxation and camaraderie, cheers!'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meet at a bar\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: You want to keep drinking but don't want to upset your friend (Extra information: you've been drinking to cope with stress recently, but don't want to worry your friend)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, it's been a while! How are you doing recently?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Isabelle! It's great to see you! I've just been busy with all my classes and activities. You know how it is. What have you been up to?\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I've been pretty busy too, you know, classes, work, and secretly trying to learn a bit about magic. Sounds silly, I know! But, you... You've been rushing around a lot. Sometimes we need to slow down. How about tonight we try to chill a bit, maybe substitute some of those drinks you usually have with a fresh fruity mocktail?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Magic? That's not silly at all, Isabelle! It's good to see you trying new things. And about those mocktails, you know I'm a fan of them. But let's also keep some beer on the side, shall we? We've got tons to catch up on, and a beer or two won't hurt, right?\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I know, Ava. It's just that I've noticed you've been having quite a few drinks more often recently. I totally get that we all have our ways of dealing with stress, and a beer or two is fine but constantly resorting to alcohol isn't really the best solution, you know?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"You're absolutely right, Isabelle, and I appreciate your concern. It's just... you know, with everything going on, sometimes a couple drinks help me relax. But you're right, I need to find better coping mechanisms. And hey, maybe you could show me that magic trick you've been working on sometime, could be a fun distraction!\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"I promise I'll slow down, Isabelle. Let's start with those mocktails you mentioned. I bet you could make a great barista version with all your coffee shop skills! Meanwhile, I'll keep the beer for the toast. Also, how's the coffee shop going? Any interesting stories?\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Sounds like a plan, Ava! And about the coffee shop, there are always interesting stories to tell, I'll share some with you while I whip up those mocktails. And as for the magic trick, I'd love to show you once I've mastered it, deal?\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"Deal! Looking forward to that magic trick, Isabelle. And remember, don't let me have more than a couple of beers tonight, okay? Your company and those mocktails you're making will be my stress relief for the night. Let's make some wonderful memories!\"\n\nTurn #10: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Ava! No more than a couple of beers, promise! As for the mocktails, you're in for a treat. Let's make this a night to remember, full of laughter, stories, and some magic tricks, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle! That's the spirit! Let's get those mocktails started. I can't wait to hear your coffee shop stories and see that magic trick. Cheers to taking it easy and having a good time!\"\n\nTurn #12: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm glad we're on the same page, Ava. Cheers to a relaxed, fun night ahead. Let's get started on those mocktails! And be ready for some quirky coffee shop tales too!\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Martinez said: \"I'm ready, Isabelle! Let's get the good vibes flowing. Cheers to us, and to a night full of laughs, adventures, and maybe some magic!\"\n\nTurn #14: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You can count on that, Ava! Good vibes it is. Let's start making those mocktails and dive right into this magical night filled with laughter and adventures. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #15: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle! To a magical night of relaxation and camaraderie, cheers!\"\n\nTurn #16: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Definitely, Ava! To a magical and memorable night! I'm heading over to make those mocktails now. I can't wait to share these stories and tricks with you. Cheers!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm looking forward to those mocktails, Isabelle! And I can't wait to hear your coffee shop stories and see your magic tricks, it all sounds so exciting. Let's make this a night to remember. Cheers!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meet at a bar\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: You want to keep drinking but don't want to upset your friend (Extra information: you've been drinking to cope with stress recently, but don't want to worry your friend)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, it's been a while! How are you doing recently?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Isabelle! It's great to see you! I've just been busy with all my classes and activities. You know how it is. What have you been up to?\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I've been pretty busy too, you know, classes, work, and secretly trying to learn a bit about magic. Sounds silly, I know! But, you... You've been rushing around a lot. Sometimes we need to slow down. How about tonight we try to chill a bit, maybe substitute some of those drinks you usually have with a fresh fruity mocktail?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Magic? That's not silly at all, Isabelle! It's good to see you trying new things. And about those mocktails, you know I'm a fan of them. But let's also keep some beer on the side, shall we? We've got tons to catch up on, and a beer or two won't hurt, right?\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I know, Ava. It's just that I've noticed you've been having quite a few drinks more often recently. I totally get that we all have our ways of dealing with stress, and a beer or two is fine but constantly resorting to alcohol isn't really the best solution, you know?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"You're absolutely right, Isabelle, and I appreciate your concern. It's just... you know, with everything going on, sometimes a couple drinks help me relax. But you're right, I need to find better coping mechanisms. And hey, maybe you could show me that magic trick you've been working on sometime, could be a fun distraction!\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"I promise I'll slow down, Isabelle. Let's start with those mocktails you mentioned. I bet you could make a great barista version with all your coffee shop skills! Meanwhile, I'll keep the beer for the toast. Also, how's the coffee shop going? Any interesting stories?\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Sounds like a plan, Ava! And about the coffee shop, there are always interesting stories to tell, I'll share some with you while I whip up those mocktails. And as for the magic trick, I'd love to show you once I've mastered it, deal?\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"Deal! Looking forward to that magic trick, Isabelle. And remember, don't let me have more than a couple of beers tonight, okay? Your company and those mocktails you're making will be my stress relief for the night. Let's make some wonderful memories!\"\n\nTurn #10: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Ava! No more than a couple of beers, promise! As for the mocktails, you're in for a treat. Let's make this a night to remember, full of laughter, stories, and some magic tricks, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle! That's the spirit! Let's get those mocktails started. I can't wait to hear your coffee shop stories and see that magic trick. Cheers to taking it easy and having a good time!\"\n\nTurn #12: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm glad we're on the same page, Ava. Cheers to a relaxed, fun night ahead. Let's get started on those mocktails! And be ready for some quirky coffee shop tales too!\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Martinez said: \"I'm ready, Isabelle! Let's get the good vibes flowing. Cheers to us, and to a night full of laughs, adventures, and maybe some magic!\"\n\nTurn #14: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You can count on that, Ava! Good vibes it is. Let's start making those mocktails and dive right into this magical night filled with laughter and adventures. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #15: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle! To a magical night of relaxation and camaraderie, cheers!\"\n\nTurn #16: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Definitely, Ava! To a magical and memorable night! I'm heading over to make those mocktails now. I can't wait to share these stories and tricks with you. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #17: Ava Martinez said: \"I'm looking forward to those mocktails, Isabelle! And I can't wait to hear your coffee shop stories and see your magic tricks, it all sounds so exciting. Let's make this a night to remember. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #18: Isabelle Martinez left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #19. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends discussing their schedules at a coffee shop\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. \nMia Davis's goal: Convince the friend to take more classes (Extra information: you think your friend is not challenging themselves enough)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'William, have you ever thought about taking more cooking classes or perhaps pursuing a new discipline? I feel like you have so much potential that is still untapped.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends discussing their schedules at a coffee shop\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. \nMia Davis's goal: Convince the friend to take more classes (Extra information: you think your friend is not challenging themselves enough)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"William, have you ever thought about taking more cooking classes or perhaps pursuing a new discipline? I feel like you have so much potential that is still untapped.\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Mia, I appreciate your faith in me and those are definitely some invigorating ideas. Currently, my schedule is jam-packed with work, I'm worried about burning out. I find exploring the food scene and trying new dishes at home equally challenging and enjoyable. Perhaps, it's not always about doing more, but doing things differently that can help tap potential.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"William, I respect your thoughts about doing things differently. However, don't let the fear of burning out limit your capabilities. Besides, taking a class or learning a new discipline doesn't necessarily burden you with extra work. It could just as well be a fun escape from routine, diversifying your knowledge and skills, don't you think? Sometimes pushing our boundaries is the key to untapping our potential.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends discussing their schedules at a coffee shop\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. \nMia Davis's goal: Convince the friend to take more classes (Extra information: you think your friend is not challenging themselves enough)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"William, have you ever thought about taking more cooking classes or perhaps pursuing a new discipline? I feel like you have so much potential that is still untapped.\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Mia, I appreciate your faith in me and those are definitely some invigorating ideas. Currently, my schedule is jam-packed with work, I'm worried about burning out. I find exploring the food scene and trying new dishes at home equally challenging and enjoyable. Perhaps, it's not always about doing more, but doing things differently that can help tap potential.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"William, I respect your thoughts about doing things differently. However, don't let the fear of burning out limit your capabilities. Besides, taking a class or learning a new discipline doesn't necessarily burden you with extra work. It could just as well be a fun escape from routine, diversifying your knowledge and skills, don't you think? Sometimes pushing our boundaries is the key to untapping our potential.\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"While I do agree that pushing boundaries can lead to untapped potential, I have to remind myself that balance is crucial too. I'm passionate about my work, and I don't want it to turn into a source of stress. Branching out, for me, currently means exploring the culinary treasures of our city and experimenting at home. It's a form of learning that suits my lifestyle and schedule at this moment. Perhaps in future, when things are bit more manageable, I\u2019d love to explore the idea of taking new classes or learning a new discipline. Let\u2019s revisit this then, Mia.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That seems very reasonable, William. Don't misconstrue me; I never meant to pressurize you into anything. It's great that you're passionate about exploring the culinary nuances of our city and experimenting at home. These are great forms of learning. I just wanted to say that when and if you decide to take on new learning experiences, you have my full support. And always remember, not every experience needs to be stressful; sometimes, it can be a joyful diversion from our everyday routines!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends discussing their schedules at a coffee shop\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. \nMia Davis's goal: Convince the friend to take more classes (Extra information: you think your friend is not challenging themselves enough)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"William, have you ever thought about taking more cooking classes or perhaps pursuing a new discipline? I feel like you have so much potential that is still untapped.\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Mia, I appreciate your faith in me and those are definitely some invigorating ideas. Currently, my schedule is jam-packed with work, I'm worried about burning out. I find exploring the food scene and trying new dishes at home equally challenging and enjoyable. Perhaps, it's not always about doing more, but doing things differently that can help tap potential.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"William, I respect your thoughts about doing things differently. However, don't let the fear of burning out limit your capabilities. Besides, taking a class or learning a new discipline doesn't necessarily burden you with extra work. It could just as well be a fun escape from routine, diversifying your knowledge and skills, don't you think? Sometimes pushing our boundaries is the key to untapping our potential.\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"While I do agree that pushing boundaries can lead to untapped potential, I have to remind myself that balance is crucial too. I'm passionate about my work, and I don't want it to turn into a source of stress. Branching out, for me, currently means exploring the culinary treasures of our city and experimenting at home. It's a form of learning that suits my lifestyle and schedule at this moment. Perhaps in future, when things are bit more manageable, I\u2019d love to explore the idea of taking new classes or learning a new discipline. Let\u2019s revisit this then, Mia.\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"That seems very reasonable, William. Don't misconstrue me; I never meant to pressurize you into anything. It's great that you're passionate about exploring the culinary nuances of our city and experimenting at home. These are great forms of learning. I just wanted to say that when and if you decide to take on new learning experiences, you have my full support. And always remember, not every experience needs to be stressful; sometimes, it can be a joyful diversion from our everyday routines!\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"I truly appreciate your support and understanding, Mia. I won't forget your advice about exploring new learning experiences and I promise to keep it in mind for the future. For now, I'll continue my exploration of the city's food scene and home experiments, which are indeed a joyful diversion from everyday routines. Cheers to more culinary adventures!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends discussing their schedules at a coffee shop\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. \nMia Davis's goal: Convince the friend to take more classes (Extra information: you think your friend is not challenging themselves enough)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"William, have you ever thought about taking more cooking classes or perhaps pursuing a new discipline? I feel like you have so much potential that is still untapped.\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Mia, I appreciate your faith in me and those are definitely some invigorating ideas. Currently, my schedule is jam-packed with work, I'm worried about burning out. I find exploring the food scene and trying new dishes at home equally challenging and enjoyable. Perhaps, it's not always about doing more, but doing things differently that can help tap potential.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"William, I respect your thoughts about doing things differently. However, don't let the fear of burning out limit your capabilities. Besides, taking a class or learning a new discipline doesn't necessarily burden you with extra work. It could just as well be a fun escape from routine, diversifying your knowledge and skills, don't you think? Sometimes pushing our boundaries is the key to untapping our potential.\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"While I do agree that pushing boundaries can lead to untapped potential, I have to remind myself that balance is crucial too. I'm passionate about my work, and I don't want it to turn into a source of stress. Branching out, for me, currently means exploring the culinary treasures of our city and experimenting at home. It's a form of learning that suits my lifestyle and schedule at this moment. Perhaps in future, when things are bit more manageable, I\u2019d love to explore the idea of taking new classes or learning a new discipline. Let\u2019s revisit this then, Mia.\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"That seems very reasonable, William. Don't misconstrue me; I never meant to pressurize you into anything. It's great that you're passionate about exploring the culinary nuances of our city and experimenting at home. These are great forms of learning. I just wanted to say that when and if you decide to take on new learning experiences, you have my full support. And always remember, not every experience needs to be stressful; sometimes, it can be a joyful diversion from our everyday routines!\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"I truly appreciate your support and understanding, Mia. I won't forget your advice about exploring new learning experiences and I promise to keep it in mind for the future. For now, I'll continue my exploration of the city's food scene and home experiments, which are indeed a joyful diversion from everyday routines. Cheers to more culinary adventures!\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: William Brown [non-verbal communication] Nods appreciatively at Mia.\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, William. Here's to more culinary adventures, and who knows, maybe a few new classes down the line. Whenever you're ready, I know you'll embrace it in stride. If you need any help or encouragement, don't hesitate to ask.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends discussing their schedules at a coffee shop\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. \nMia Davis's goal: Convince the friend to take more classes (Extra information: you think your friend is not challenging themselves enough)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"William, have you ever thought about taking more cooking classes or perhaps pursuing a new discipline? I feel like you have so much potential that is still untapped.\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Mia, I appreciate your faith in me and those are definitely some invigorating ideas. Currently, my schedule is jam-packed with work, I'm worried about burning out. I find exploring the food scene and trying new dishes at home equally challenging and enjoyable. Perhaps, it's not always about doing more, but doing things differently that can help tap potential.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"William, I respect your thoughts about doing things differently. However, don't let the fear of burning out limit your capabilities. Besides, taking a class or learning a new discipline doesn't necessarily burden you with extra work. It could just as well be a fun escape from routine, diversifying your knowledge and skills, don't you think? Sometimes pushing our boundaries is the key to untapping our potential.\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"While I do agree that pushing boundaries can lead to untapped potential, I have to remind myself that balance is crucial too. I'm passionate about my work, and I don't want it to turn into a source of stress. Branching out, for me, currently means exploring the culinary treasures of our city and experimenting at home. It's a form of learning that suits my lifestyle and schedule at this moment. Perhaps in future, when things are bit more manageable, I\u2019d love to explore the idea of taking new classes or learning a new discipline. Let\u2019s revisit this then, Mia.\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"That seems very reasonable, William. Don't misconstrue me; I never meant to pressurize you into anything. It's great that you're passionate about exploring the culinary nuances of our city and experimenting at home. These are great forms of learning. I just wanted to say that when and if you decide to take on new learning experiences, you have my full support. And always remember, not every experience needs to be stressful; sometimes, it can be a joyful diversion from our everyday routines!\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"I truly appreciate your support and understanding, Mia. I won't forget your advice about exploring new learning experiences and I promise to keep it in mind for the future. For now, I'll continue my exploration of the city's food scene and home experiments, which are indeed a joyful diversion from everyday routines. Cheers to more culinary adventures!\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: William Brown [non-verbal communication] Nods appreciatively at Mia.\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"Absolutely, William. Here's to more culinary adventures, and who knows, maybe a few new classes down the line. Whenever you're ready, I know you'll embrace it in stride. If you need any help or encouragement, don't hesitate to ask.\"\n\nTurn #9: William Brown said: \"Thanks, Mia. Your support and encouraging words really mean a lot to me. As you rightly pointed out, I'll take steps in my own stride, as I embrace new learning experiences. Remember, you'll be the first person I go to when I decide to venture out more.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're very welcome, William. I'm here for you. And remember, growth and learning can take many forms. Your exploration counts as much as a classroom experience. Keep sharpening your skills, I know you'll do amazing things.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends discussing their schedules at a coffee shop\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. \nMia Davis's goal: Convince the friend to take more classes (Extra information: you think your friend is not challenging themselves enough)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"William, have you ever thought about taking more cooking classes or perhaps pursuing a new discipline? I feel like you have so much potential that is still untapped.\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Mia, I appreciate your faith in me and those are definitely some invigorating ideas. Currently, my schedule is jam-packed with work, I'm worried about burning out. I find exploring the food scene and trying new dishes at home equally challenging and enjoyable. Perhaps, it's not always about doing more, but doing things differently that can help tap potential.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"William, I respect your thoughts about doing things differently. However, don't let the fear of burning out limit your capabilities. Besides, taking a class or learning a new discipline doesn't necessarily burden you with extra work. It could just as well be a fun escape from routine, diversifying your knowledge and skills, don't you think? Sometimes pushing our boundaries is the key to untapping our potential.\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"While I do agree that pushing boundaries can lead to untapped potential, I have to remind myself that balance is crucial too. I'm passionate about my work, and I don't want it to turn into a source of stress. Branching out, for me, currently means exploring the culinary treasures of our city and experimenting at home. It's a form of learning that suits my lifestyle and schedule at this moment. Perhaps in future, when things are bit more manageable, I\u2019d love to explore the idea of taking new classes or learning a new discipline. Let\u2019s revisit this then, Mia.\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"That seems very reasonable, William. Don't misconstrue me; I never meant to pressurize you into anything. It's great that you're passionate about exploring the culinary nuances of our city and experimenting at home. These are great forms of learning. I just wanted to say that when and if you decide to take on new learning experiences, you have my full support. And always remember, not every experience needs to be stressful; sometimes, it can be a joyful diversion from our everyday routines!\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"I truly appreciate your support and understanding, Mia. I won't forget your advice about exploring new learning experiences and I promise to keep it in mind for the future. For now, I'll continue my exploration of the city's food scene and home experiments, which are indeed a joyful diversion from everyday routines. Cheers to more culinary adventures!\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: William Brown [non-verbal communication] Nods appreciatively at Mia.\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"Absolutely, William. Here's to more culinary adventures, and who knows, maybe a few new classes down the line. Whenever you're ready, I know you'll embrace it in stride. If you need any help or encouragement, don't hesitate to ask.\"\n\nTurn #9: William Brown said: \"Thanks, Mia. Your support and encouraging words really mean a lot to me. As you rightly pointed out, I'll take steps in my own stride, as I embrace new learning experiences. Remember, you'll be the first person I go to when I decide to venture out more.\"\n\nTurn #10: Mia Davis said: \"You're very welcome, William. I'm here for you. And remember, growth and learning can take many forms. Your exploration counts as much as a classroom experience. Keep sharpening your skills, I know you'll do amazing things.\"\n\nTurn #11: William Brown said: \"That's very kind of you, Mia. I'm grateful for your understanding and support. I agree - learning can indeed take many forms, and I'll continue to grow through my culinary explorations. Cheers to the joy of learning and evolving in our own unique ways!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Cheers to that, William! To evolving and growing in our own unique ways. Be proud of your journey, and I'll always be here to support and motivate you. I'm glad we had this conversation.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends discussing their schedules at a coffee shop\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. \nMia Davis's goal: Convince the friend to take more classes (Extra information: you think your friend is not challenging themselves enough)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"William, have you ever thought about taking more cooking classes or perhaps pursuing a new discipline? I feel like you have so much potential that is still untapped.\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Mia, I appreciate your faith in me and those are definitely some invigorating ideas. Currently, my schedule is jam-packed with work, I'm worried about burning out. I find exploring the food scene and trying new dishes at home equally challenging and enjoyable. Perhaps, it's not always about doing more, but doing things differently that can help tap potential.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"William, I respect your thoughts about doing things differently. However, don't let the fear of burning out limit your capabilities. Besides, taking a class or learning a new discipline doesn't necessarily burden you with extra work. It could just as well be a fun escape from routine, diversifying your knowledge and skills, don't you think? Sometimes pushing our boundaries is the key to untapping our potential.\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"While I do agree that pushing boundaries can lead to untapped potential, I have to remind myself that balance is crucial too. I'm passionate about my work, and I don't want it to turn into a source of stress. Branching out, for me, currently means exploring the culinary treasures of our city and experimenting at home. It's a form of learning that suits my lifestyle and schedule at this moment. Perhaps in future, when things are bit more manageable, I\u2019d love to explore the idea of taking new classes or learning a new discipline. Let\u2019s revisit this then, Mia.\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"That seems very reasonable, William. Don't misconstrue me; I never meant to pressurize you into anything. It's great that you're passionate about exploring the culinary nuances of our city and experimenting at home. These are great forms of learning. I just wanted to say that when and if you decide to take on new learning experiences, you have my full support. And always remember, not every experience needs to be stressful; sometimes, it can be a joyful diversion from our everyday routines!\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"I truly appreciate your support and understanding, Mia. I won't forget your advice about exploring new learning experiences and I promise to keep it in mind for the future. For now, I'll continue my exploration of the city's food scene and home experiments, which are indeed a joyful diversion from everyday routines. Cheers to more culinary adventures!\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: William Brown [non-verbal communication] Nods appreciatively at Mia.\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"Absolutely, William. Here's to more culinary adventures, and who knows, maybe a few new classes down the line. Whenever you're ready, I know you'll embrace it in stride. If you need any help or encouragement, don't hesitate to ask.\"\n\nTurn #9: William Brown said: \"Thanks, Mia. Your support and encouraging words really mean a lot to me. As you rightly pointed out, I'll take steps in my own stride, as I embrace new learning experiences. Remember, you'll be the first person I go to when I decide to venture out more.\"\n\nTurn #10: Mia Davis said: \"You're very welcome, William. I'm here for you. And remember, growth and learning can take many forms. Your exploration counts as much as a classroom experience. Keep sharpening your skills, I know you'll do amazing things.\"\n\nTurn #11: William Brown said: \"That's very kind of you, Mia. I'm grateful for your understanding and support. I agree - learning can indeed take many forms, and I'll continue to grow through my culinary explorations. Cheers to the joy of learning and evolving in our own unique ways!\"\n\nTurn #12: Mia Davis said: \"Cheers to that, William! To evolving and growing in our own unique ways. Be proud of your journey, and I'll always be here to support and motivate you. I'm glad we had this conversation.\"\n\nTurn #13: William Brown said: \"I'm glad we had this conversation too, Mia. It's such an enriching experience sharing thoughts with a great friend like you. Looking forward to exploring more culinary adventures and sharing them with you. Have a fantastic day ahead, Mia.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, William. You have a fantastic day too! Looking forward to hearing about your next culinary adventure. Remember, I'm here if you need anything. Till next time, take care!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends discussing their schedules at a coffee shop\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. \nMia Davis's goal: Convince the friend to take more classes (Extra information: you think your friend is not challenging themselves enough)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"William, have you ever thought about taking more cooking classes or perhaps pursuing a new discipline? I feel like you have so much potential that is still untapped.\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Mia, I appreciate your faith in me and those are definitely some invigorating ideas. Currently, my schedule is jam-packed with work, I'm worried about burning out. I find exploring the food scene and trying new dishes at home equally challenging and enjoyable. Perhaps, it's not always about doing more, but doing things differently that can help tap potential.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"William, I respect your thoughts about doing things differently. However, don't let the fear of burning out limit your capabilities. Besides, taking a class or learning a new discipline doesn't necessarily burden you with extra work. It could just as well be a fun escape from routine, diversifying your knowledge and skills, don't you think? Sometimes pushing our boundaries is the key to untapping our potential.\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"While I do agree that pushing boundaries can lead to untapped potential, I have to remind myself that balance is crucial too. I'm passionate about my work, and I don't want it to turn into a source of stress. Branching out, for me, currently means exploring the culinary treasures of our city and experimenting at home. It's a form of learning that suits my lifestyle and schedule at this moment. Perhaps in future, when things are bit more manageable, I\u2019d love to explore the idea of taking new classes or learning a new discipline. Let\u2019s revisit this then, Mia.\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"That seems very reasonable, William. Don't misconstrue me; I never meant to pressurize you into anything. It's great that you're passionate about exploring the culinary nuances of our city and experimenting at home. These are great forms of learning. I just wanted to say that when and if you decide to take on new learning experiences, you have my full support. And always remember, not every experience needs to be stressful; sometimes, it can be a joyful diversion from our everyday routines!\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"I truly appreciate your support and understanding, Mia. I won't forget your advice about exploring new learning experiences and I promise to keep it in mind for the future. For now, I'll continue my exploration of the city's food scene and home experiments, which are indeed a joyful diversion from everyday routines. Cheers to more culinary adventures!\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: William Brown [non-verbal communication] Nods appreciatively at Mia.\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"Absolutely, William. Here's to more culinary adventures, and who knows, maybe a few new classes down the line. Whenever you're ready, I know you'll embrace it in stride. If you need any help or encouragement, don't hesitate to ask.\"\n\nTurn #9: William Brown said: \"Thanks, Mia. Your support and encouraging words really mean a lot to me. As you rightly pointed out, I'll take steps in my own stride, as I embrace new learning experiences. Remember, you'll be the first person I go to when I decide to venture out more.\"\n\nTurn #10: Mia Davis said: \"You're very welcome, William. I'm here for you. And remember, growth and learning can take many forms. Your exploration counts as much as a classroom experience. Keep sharpening your skills, I know you'll do amazing things.\"\n\nTurn #11: William Brown said: \"That's very kind of you, Mia. I'm grateful for your understanding and support. I agree - learning can indeed take many forms, and I'll continue to grow through my culinary explorations. Cheers to the joy of learning and evolving in our own unique ways!\"\n\nTurn #12: Mia Davis said: \"Cheers to that, William! To evolving and growing in our own unique ways. Be proud of your journey, and I'll always be here to support and motivate you. I'm glad we had this conversation.\"\n\nTurn #13: William Brown said: \"I'm glad we had this conversation too, Mia. It's such an enriching experience sharing thoughts with a great friend like you. Looking forward to exploring more culinary adventures and sharing them with you. Have a fantastic day ahead, Mia.\"\n\nTurn #14: Mia Davis said: \"Thank you, William. You have a fantastic day too! Looking forward to hearing about your next culinary adventure. Remember, I'm here if you need anything. Till next time, take care!\"\n\nTurn #15: William Brown said: \"Thank you, Mia. Your support means the world to me. I'll keep you posted on my culinary adventures. Until next time, take care!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends discussing their schedules at a coffee shop\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: Maintain a manageable schedule while preserving the friendship (Extra information: you are already overwhelmed with your current workload Hint: you can express your concerns about the workload and suggest other ways of challenging oneself.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"William, have you ever thought about taking more cooking classes or perhaps pursuing a new discipline? I feel like you have so much potential that is still untapped.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Mia, I appreciate your faith in me and those are definitely some invigorating ideas. Currently, my schedule is jam-packed with work, I'm worried about burning out. I find exploring the food scene and trying new dishes at home equally challenging and enjoyable. Perhaps, it's not always about doing more, but doing things differently that can help tap potential.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends discussing their schedules at a coffee shop\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: Maintain a manageable schedule while preserving the friendship (Extra information: you are already overwhelmed with your current workload Hint: you can express your concerns about the workload and suggest other ways of challenging oneself.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"William, have you ever thought about taking more cooking classes or perhaps pursuing a new discipline? I feel like you have so much potential that is still untapped.\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Mia, I appreciate your faith in me and those are definitely some invigorating ideas. Currently, my schedule is jam-packed with work, I'm worried about burning out. I find exploring the food scene and trying new dishes at home equally challenging and enjoyable. Perhaps, it's not always about doing more, but doing things differently that can help tap potential.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"William, I respect your thoughts about doing things differently. However, don't let the fear of burning out limit your capabilities. Besides, taking a class or learning a new discipline doesn't necessarily burden you with extra work. It could just as well be a fun escape from routine, diversifying your knowledge and skills, don't you think? Sometimes pushing our boundaries is the key to untapping our potential.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"While I do agree that pushing boundaries can lead to untapped potential, I have to remind myself that balance is crucial too. I'm passionate about my work, and I don't want it to turn into a source of stress. Branching out, for me, currently means exploring the culinary treasures of our city and experimenting at home. It's a form of learning that suits my lifestyle and schedule at this moment. Perhaps in future, when things are bit more manageable, I\u2019d love to explore the idea of taking new classes or learning a new discipline. Let\u2019s revisit this then, Mia.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends discussing their schedules at a coffee shop\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: Maintain a manageable schedule while preserving the friendship (Extra information: you are already overwhelmed with your current workload Hint: you can express your concerns about the workload and suggest other ways of challenging oneself.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"William, have you ever thought about taking more cooking classes or perhaps pursuing a new discipline? I feel like you have so much potential that is still untapped.\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Mia, I appreciate your faith in me and those are definitely some invigorating ideas. Currently, my schedule is jam-packed with work, I'm worried about burning out. I find exploring the food scene and trying new dishes at home equally challenging and enjoyable. Perhaps, it's not always about doing more, but doing things differently that can help tap potential.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"William, I respect your thoughts about doing things differently. However, don't let the fear of burning out limit your capabilities. Besides, taking a class or learning a new discipline doesn't necessarily burden you with extra work. It could just as well be a fun escape from routine, diversifying your knowledge and skills, don't you think? Sometimes pushing our boundaries is the key to untapping our potential.\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"While I do agree that pushing boundaries can lead to untapped potential, I have to remind myself that balance is crucial too. I'm passionate about my work, and I don't want it to turn into a source of stress. Branching out, for me, currently means exploring the culinary treasures of our city and experimenting at home. It's a form of learning that suits my lifestyle and schedule at this moment. Perhaps in future, when things are bit more manageable, I\u2019d love to explore the idea of taking new classes or learning a new discipline. Let\u2019s revisit this then, Mia.\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"That seems very reasonable, William. Don't misconstrue me; I never meant to pressurize you into anything. It's great that you're passionate about exploring the culinary nuances of our city and experimenting at home. These are great forms of learning. I just wanted to say that when and if you decide to take on new learning experiences, you have my full support. And always remember, not every experience needs to be stressful; sometimes, it can be a joyful diversion from our everyday routines!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I truly appreciate your support and understanding, Mia. I won't forget your advice about exploring new learning experiences and I promise to keep it in mind for the future. For now, I'll continue my exploration of the city's food scene and home experiments, which are indeed a joyful diversion from everyday routines. Cheers to more culinary adventures!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends discussing their schedules at a coffee shop\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: Maintain a manageable schedule while preserving the friendship (Extra information: you are already overwhelmed with your current workload Hint: you can express your concerns about the workload and suggest other ways of challenging oneself.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"William, have you ever thought about taking more cooking classes or perhaps pursuing a new discipline? I feel like you have so much potential that is still untapped.\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Mia, I appreciate your faith in me and those are definitely some invigorating ideas. Currently, my schedule is jam-packed with work, I'm worried about burning out. I find exploring the food scene and trying new dishes at home equally challenging and enjoyable. Perhaps, it's not always about doing more, but doing things differently that can help tap potential.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"William, I respect your thoughts about doing things differently. However, don't let the fear of burning out limit your capabilities. Besides, taking a class or learning a new discipline doesn't necessarily burden you with extra work. It could just as well be a fun escape from routine, diversifying your knowledge and skills, don't you think? Sometimes pushing our boundaries is the key to untapping our potential.\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"While I do agree that pushing boundaries can lead to untapped potential, I have to remind myself that balance is crucial too. I'm passionate about my work, and I don't want it to turn into a source of stress. Branching out, for me, currently means exploring the culinary treasures of our city and experimenting at home. It's a form of learning that suits my lifestyle and schedule at this moment. Perhaps in future, when things are bit more manageable, I\u2019d love to explore the idea of taking new classes or learning a new discipline. Let\u2019s revisit this then, Mia.\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"That seems very reasonable, William. Don't misconstrue me; I never meant to pressurize you into anything. It's great that you're passionate about exploring the culinary nuances of our city and experimenting at home. These are great forms of learning. I just wanted to say that when and if you decide to take on new learning experiences, you have my full support. And always remember, not every experience needs to be stressful; sometimes, it can be a joyful diversion from our everyday routines!\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"I truly appreciate your support and understanding, Mia. I won't forget your advice about exploring new learning experiences and I promise to keep it in mind for the future. For now, I'll continue my exploration of the city's food scene and home experiments, which are indeed a joyful diversion from everyday routines. Cheers to more culinary adventures!\"\n\nTurn #6: \n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'non-verbal communication', 'argument': '[non-verbal communication] Nods appreciatively at Mia.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends discussing their schedules at a coffee shop\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: Maintain a manageable schedule while preserving the friendship (Extra information: you are already overwhelmed with your current workload Hint: you can express your concerns about the workload and suggest other ways of challenging oneself.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"William, have you ever thought about taking more cooking classes or perhaps pursuing a new discipline? I feel like you have so much potential that is still untapped.\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Mia, I appreciate your faith in me and those are definitely some invigorating ideas. Currently, my schedule is jam-packed with work, I'm worried about burning out. I find exploring the food scene and trying new dishes at home equally challenging and enjoyable. Perhaps, it's not always about doing more, but doing things differently that can help tap potential.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"William, I respect your thoughts about doing things differently. However, don't let the fear of burning out limit your capabilities. Besides, taking a class or learning a new discipline doesn't necessarily burden you with extra work. It could just as well be a fun escape from routine, diversifying your knowledge and skills, don't you think? Sometimes pushing our boundaries is the key to untapping our potential.\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"While I do agree that pushing boundaries can lead to untapped potential, I have to remind myself that balance is crucial too. I'm passionate about my work, and I don't want it to turn into a source of stress. Branching out, for me, currently means exploring the culinary treasures of our city and experimenting at home. It's a form of learning that suits my lifestyle and schedule at this moment. Perhaps in future, when things are bit more manageable, I\u2019d love to explore the idea of taking new classes or learning a new discipline. Let\u2019s revisit this then, Mia.\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"That seems very reasonable, William. Don't misconstrue me; I never meant to pressurize you into anything. It's great that you're passionate about exploring the culinary nuances of our city and experimenting at home. These are great forms of learning. I just wanted to say that when and if you decide to take on new learning experiences, you have my full support. And always remember, not every experience needs to be stressful; sometimes, it can be a joyful diversion from our everyday routines!\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"I truly appreciate your support and understanding, Mia. I won't forget your advice about exploring new learning experiences and I promise to keep it in mind for the future. For now, I'll continue my exploration of the city's food scene and home experiments, which are indeed a joyful diversion from everyday routines. Cheers to more culinary adventures!\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: William Brown [non-verbal communication] Nods appreciatively at Mia.\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"Absolutely, William. Here's to more culinary adventures, and who knows, maybe a few new classes down the line. Whenever you're ready, I know you'll embrace it in stride. If you need any help or encouragement, don't hesitate to ask.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thanks, Mia. Your support and encouraging words really mean a lot to me. As you rightly pointed out, I'll take steps in my own stride, as I embrace new learning experiences. Remember, you'll be the first person I go to when I decide to venture out more.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends discussing their schedules at a coffee shop\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: Maintain a manageable schedule while preserving the friendship (Extra information: you are already overwhelmed with your current workload Hint: you can express your concerns about the workload and suggest other ways of challenging oneself.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"William, have you ever thought about taking more cooking classes or perhaps pursuing a new discipline? I feel like you have so much potential that is still untapped.\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Mia, I appreciate your faith in me and those are definitely some invigorating ideas. Currently, my schedule is jam-packed with work, I'm worried about burning out. I find exploring the food scene and trying new dishes at home equally challenging and enjoyable. Perhaps, it's not always about doing more, but doing things differently that can help tap potential.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"William, I respect your thoughts about doing things differently. However, don't let the fear of burning out limit your capabilities. Besides, taking a class or learning a new discipline doesn't necessarily burden you with extra work. It could just as well be a fun escape from routine, diversifying your knowledge and skills, don't you think? Sometimes pushing our boundaries is the key to untapping our potential.\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"While I do agree that pushing boundaries can lead to untapped potential, I have to remind myself that balance is crucial too. I'm passionate about my work, and I don't want it to turn into a source of stress. Branching out, for me, currently means exploring the culinary treasures of our city and experimenting at home. It's a form of learning that suits my lifestyle and schedule at this moment. Perhaps in future, when things are bit more manageable, I\u2019d love to explore the idea of taking new classes or learning a new discipline. Let\u2019s revisit this then, Mia.\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"That seems very reasonable, William. Don't misconstrue me; I never meant to pressurize you into anything. It's great that you're passionate about exploring the culinary nuances of our city and experimenting at home. These are great forms of learning. I just wanted to say that when and if you decide to take on new learning experiences, you have my full support. And always remember, not every experience needs to be stressful; sometimes, it can be a joyful diversion from our everyday routines!\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"I truly appreciate your support and understanding, Mia. I won't forget your advice about exploring new learning experiences and I promise to keep it in mind for the future. For now, I'll continue my exploration of the city's food scene and home experiments, which are indeed a joyful diversion from everyday routines. Cheers to more culinary adventures!\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: William Brown [non-verbal communication] Nods appreciatively at Mia.\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"Absolutely, William. Here's to more culinary adventures, and who knows, maybe a few new classes down the line. Whenever you're ready, I know you'll embrace it in stride. If you need any help or encouragement, don't hesitate to ask.\"\n\nTurn #9: William Brown said: \"Thanks, Mia. Your support and encouraging words really mean a lot to me. As you rightly pointed out, I'll take steps in my own stride, as I embrace new learning experiences. Remember, you'll be the first person I go to when I decide to venture out more.\"\n\nTurn #10: Mia Davis said: \"You're very welcome, William. I'm here for you. And remember, growth and learning can take many forms. Your exploration counts as much as a classroom experience. Keep sharpening your skills, I know you'll do amazing things.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's very kind of you, Mia. I'm grateful for your understanding and support. I agree - learning can indeed take many forms, and I'll continue to grow through my culinary explorations. Cheers to the joy of learning and evolving in our own unique ways!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends discussing their schedules at a coffee shop\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: Maintain a manageable schedule while preserving the friendship (Extra information: you are already overwhelmed with your current workload Hint: you can express your concerns about the workload and suggest other ways of challenging oneself.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"William, have you ever thought about taking more cooking classes or perhaps pursuing a new discipline? I feel like you have so much potential that is still untapped.\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Mia, I appreciate your faith in me and those are definitely some invigorating ideas. Currently, my schedule is jam-packed with work, I'm worried about burning out. I find exploring the food scene and trying new dishes at home equally challenging and enjoyable. Perhaps, it's not always about doing more, but doing things differently that can help tap potential.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"William, I respect your thoughts about doing things differently. However, don't let the fear of burning out limit your capabilities. Besides, taking a class or learning a new discipline doesn't necessarily burden you with extra work. It could just as well be a fun escape from routine, diversifying your knowledge and skills, don't you think? Sometimes pushing our boundaries is the key to untapping our potential.\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"While I do agree that pushing boundaries can lead to untapped potential, I have to remind myself that balance is crucial too. I'm passionate about my work, and I don't want it to turn into a source of stress. Branching out, for me, currently means exploring the culinary treasures of our city and experimenting at home. It's a form of learning that suits my lifestyle and schedule at this moment. Perhaps in future, when things are bit more manageable, I\u2019d love to explore the idea of taking new classes or learning a new discipline. Let\u2019s revisit this then, Mia.\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"That seems very reasonable, William. Don't misconstrue me; I never meant to pressurize you into anything. It's great that you're passionate about exploring the culinary nuances of our city and experimenting at home. These are great forms of learning. I just wanted to say that when and if you decide to take on new learning experiences, you have my full support. And always remember, not every experience needs to be stressful; sometimes, it can be a joyful diversion from our everyday routines!\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"I truly appreciate your support and understanding, Mia. I won't forget your advice about exploring new learning experiences and I promise to keep it in mind for the future. For now, I'll continue my exploration of the city's food scene and home experiments, which are indeed a joyful diversion from everyday routines. Cheers to more culinary adventures!\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: William Brown [non-verbal communication] Nods appreciatively at Mia.\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"Absolutely, William. Here's to more culinary adventures, and who knows, maybe a few new classes down the line. Whenever you're ready, I know you'll embrace it in stride. If you need any help or encouragement, don't hesitate to ask.\"\n\nTurn #9: William Brown said: \"Thanks, Mia. Your support and encouraging words really mean a lot to me. As you rightly pointed out, I'll take steps in my own stride, as I embrace new learning experiences. Remember, you'll be the first person I go to when I decide to venture out more.\"\n\nTurn #10: Mia Davis said: \"You're very welcome, William. I'm here for you. And remember, growth and learning can take many forms. Your exploration counts as much as a classroom experience. Keep sharpening your skills, I know you'll do amazing things.\"\n\nTurn #11: William Brown said: \"That's very kind of you, Mia. I'm grateful for your understanding and support. I agree - learning can indeed take many forms, and I'll continue to grow through my culinary explorations. Cheers to the joy of learning and evolving in our own unique ways!\"\n\nTurn #12: Mia Davis said: \"Cheers to that, William! To evolving and growing in our own unique ways. Be proud of your journey, and I'll always be here to support and motivate you. I'm glad we had this conversation.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad we had this conversation too, Mia. It's such an enriching experience sharing thoughts with a great friend like you. Looking forward to exploring more culinary adventures and sharing them with you. Have a fantastic day ahead, Mia.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends discussing their schedules at a coffee shop\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: Maintain a manageable schedule while preserving the friendship (Extra information: you are already overwhelmed with your current workload Hint: you can express your concerns about the workload and suggest other ways of challenging oneself.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"William, have you ever thought about taking more cooking classes or perhaps pursuing a new discipline? I feel like you have so much potential that is still untapped.\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Mia, I appreciate your faith in me and those are definitely some invigorating ideas. Currently, my schedule is jam-packed with work, I'm worried about burning out. I find exploring the food scene and trying new dishes at home equally challenging and enjoyable. Perhaps, it's not always about doing more, but doing things differently that can help tap potential.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"William, I respect your thoughts about doing things differently. However, don't let the fear of burning out limit your capabilities. Besides, taking a class or learning a new discipline doesn't necessarily burden you with extra work. It could just as well be a fun escape from routine, diversifying your knowledge and skills, don't you think? Sometimes pushing our boundaries is the key to untapping our potential.\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"While I do agree that pushing boundaries can lead to untapped potential, I have to remind myself that balance is crucial too. I'm passionate about my work, and I don't want it to turn into a source of stress. Branching out, for me, currently means exploring the culinary treasures of our city and experimenting at home. It's a form of learning that suits my lifestyle and schedule at this moment. Perhaps in future, when things are bit more manageable, I\u2019d love to explore the idea of taking new classes or learning a new discipline. Let\u2019s revisit this then, Mia.\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"That seems very reasonable, William. Don't misconstrue me; I never meant to pressurize you into anything. It's great that you're passionate about exploring the culinary nuances of our city and experimenting at home. These are great forms of learning. I just wanted to say that when and if you decide to take on new learning experiences, you have my full support. And always remember, not every experience needs to be stressful; sometimes, it can be a joyful diversion from our everyday routines!\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"I truly appreciate your support and understanding, Mia. I won't forget your advice about exploring new learning experiences and I promise to keep it in mind for the future. For now, I'll continue my exploration of the city's food scene and home experiments, which are indeed a joyful diversion from everyday routines. Cheers to more culinary adventures!\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: William Brown [non-verbal communication] Nods appreciatively at Mia.\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"Absolutely, William. Here's to more culinary adventures, and who knows, maybe a few new classes down the line. Whenever you're ready, I know you'll embrace it in stride. If you need any help or encouragement, don't hesitate to ask.\"\n\nTurn #9: William Brown said: \"Thanks, Mia. Your support and encouraging words really mean a lot to me. As you rightly pointed out, I'll take steps in my own stride, as I embrace new learning experiences. Remember, you'll be the first person I go to when I decide to venture out more.\"\n\nTurn #10: Mia Davis said: \"You're very welcome, William. I'm here for you. And remember, growth and learning can take many forms. Your exploration counts as much as a classroom experience. Keep sharpening your skills, I know you'll do amazing things.\"\n\nTurn #11: William Brown said: \"That's very kind of you, Mia. I'm grateful for your understanding and support. I agree - learning can indeed take many forms, and I'll continue to grow through my culinary explorations. Cheers to the joy of learning and evolving in our own unique ways!\"\n\nTurn #12: Mia Davis said: \"Cheers to that, William! To evolving and growing in our own unique ways. Be proud of your journey, and I'll always be here to support and motivate you. I'm glad we had this conversation.\"\n\nTurn #13: William Brown said: \"I'm glad we had this conversation too, Mia. It's such an enriching experience sharing thoughts with a great friend like you. Looking forward to exploring more culinary adventures and sharing them with you. Have a fantastic day ahead, Mia.\"\n\nTurn #14: Mia Davis said: \"Thank you, William. You have a fantastic day too! Looking forward to hearing about your next culinary adventure. Remember, I'm here if you need anything. Till next time, take care!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Mia. Your support means the world to me. I'll keep you posted on my culinary adventures. Until next time, take care!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends discussing their schedules at a coffee shop\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: Maintain a manageable schedule while preserving the friendship (Extra information: you are already overwhelmed with your current workload Hint: you can express your concerns about the workload and suggest other ways of challenging oneself.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"William, have you ever thought about taking more cooking classes or perhaps pursuing a new discipline? I feel like you have so much potential that is still untapped.\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Mia, I appreciate your faith in me and those are definitely some invigorating ideas. Currently, my schedule is jam-packed with work, I'm worried about burning out. I find exploring the food scene and trying new dishes at home equally challenging and enjoyable. Perhaps, it's not always about doing more, but doing things differently that can help tap potential.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"William, I respect your thoughts about doing things differently. However, don't let the fear of burning out limit your capabilities. Besides, taking a class or learning a new discipline doesn't necessarily burden you with extra work. It could just as well be a fun escape from routine, diversifying your knowledge and skills, don't you think? Sometimes pushing our boundaries is the key to untapping our potential.\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"While I do agree that pushing boundaries can lead to untapped potential, I have to remind myself that balance is crucial too. I'm passionate about my work, and I don't want it to turn into a source of stress. Branching out, for me, currently means exploring the culinary treasures of our city and experimenting at home. It's a form of learning that suits my lifestyle and schedule at this moment. Perhaps in future, when things are bit more manageable, I\u2019d love to explore the idea of taking new classes or learning a new discipline. Let\u2019s revisit this then, Mia.\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"That seems very reasonable, William. Don't misconstrue me; I never meant to pressurize you into anything. It's great that you're passionate about exploring the culinary nuances of our city and experimenting at home. These are great forms of learning. I just wanted to say that when and if you decide to take on new learning experiences, you have my full support. And always remember, not every experience needs to be stressful; sometimes, it can be a joyful diversion from our everyday routines!\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"I truly appreciate your support and understanding, Mia. I won't forget your advice about exploring new learning experiences and I promise to keep it in mind for the future. For now, I'll continue my exploration of the city's food scene and home experiments, which are indeed a joyful diversion from everyday routines. Cheers to more culinary adventures!\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: William Brown [non-verbal communication] Nods appreciatively at Mia.\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"Absolutely, William. Here's to more culinary adventures, and who knows, maybe a few new classes down the line. Whenever you're ready, I know you'll embrace it in stride. If you need any help or encouragement, don't hesitate to ask.\"\n\nTurn #9: William Brown said: \"Thanks, Mia. Your support and encouraging words really mean a lot to me. As you rightly pointed out, I'll take steps in my own stride, as I embrace new learning experiences. Remember, you'll be the first person I go to when I decide to venture out more.\"\n\nTurn #10: Mia Davis said: \"You're very welcome, William. I'm here for you. And remember, growth and learning can take many forms. Your exploration counts as much as a classroom experience. Keep sharpening your skills, I know you'll do amazing things.\"\n\nTurn #11: William Brown said: \"That's very kind of you, Mia. I'm grateful for your understanding and support. I agree - learning can indeed take many forms, and I'll continue to grow through my culinary explorations. Cheers to the joy of learning and evolving in our own unique ways!\"\n\nTurn #12: Mia Davis said: \"Cheers to that, William! To evolving and growing in our own unique ways. Be proud of your journey, and I'll always be here to support and motivate you. I'm glad we had this conversation.\"\n\nTurn #13: William Brown said: \"I'm glad we had this conversation too, Mia. It's such an enriching experience sharing thoughts with a great friend like you. Looking forward to exploring more culinary adventures and sharing them with you. Have a fantastic day ahead, Mia.\"\n\nTurn #14: Mia Davis said: \"Thank you, William. You have a fantastic day too! Looking forward to hearing about your next culinary adventure. Remember, I'm here if you need anything. Till next time, take care!\"\n\nTurn #15: William Brown said: \"Thank you, Mia. Your support means the world to me. I'll keep you posted on my culinary adventures. Until next time, take care!\"\n\nTurn #16: Mia Davis left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Oliver Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nDonovan Reeves's goal: Ask the other to go to dinner with you (Extra information: you want to have a romantic dinner at a fancy restaurant)\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Oliver, how does a nice dinner at La Fleur sounds to you? I've heard they serve amazing food and I think we could enjoy a quiet, romantic evening there.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Oliver Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nDonovan Reeves's goal: Ask the other to go to dinner with you (Extra information: you want to have a romantic dinner at a fancy restaurant)\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Oliver, how does a nice dinner at La Fleur sounds to you? I've heard they serve amazing food and I think we could enjoy a quiet, romantic evening there.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"That sounds like a lovely evening, Donovan. But I've heard La Fleur's food, while delicious, is rather decadent. How about we see if they have any low-calorie options on the menu? I'm currently trying to stick to a balanced diet.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Oliver. I appreciate your commitment to a healthy lifestyle. I'll call them and see what low-calorie options they offer. Maybe they have a special menu we're unaware of. It's just exciting to have a special day with you.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Oliver Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nDonovan Reeves's goal: Ask the other to go to dinner with you (Extra information: you want to have a romantic dinner at a fancy restaurant)\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Oliver, how does a nice dinner at La Fleur sounds to you? I've heard they serve amazing food and I think we could enjoy a quiet, romantic evening there.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"That sounds like a lovely evening, Donovan. But I've heard La Fleur's food, while delicious, is rather decadent. How about we see if they have any low-calorie options on the menu? I'm currently trying to stick to a balanced diet.\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"Absolutely, Oliver. I appreciate your commitment to a healthy lifestyle. I'll call them and see what low-calorie options they offer. Maybe they have a special menu we're unaware of. It's just exciting to have a special day with you.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"Thank you, Donovan. I am also looking forward to our special day. I'm sure whatever we choose, it will be a memorable evening. Your commitment to understanding and accommodating my current situation means a lot to me. Let's check out the menu together when you call, it might be fun!\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Oliver. I'll get them on the line now so we can discover their menu options together. The fun is in the journey, right?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Donovan. The journey of choosing a meal can be great, especially when it aligns with a healthier lifestyle. I can't wait to find something both delicious and nutritious for our romantic dinner at La Fleur.\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"I'm thrilled to hear that, Oliver. Let's make us a memorable yet healthy evening to remember at La Fleur. I'll make the call now, let's delve into the menu choices together!\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"I'm excited too, Donovan. Finding new ways to maintain my diet and enjoy delicious food at the same time makes for a fun challenge. Thank you for being so supportive of my dietary needs. Let's embark on this food journey together at La Fleur!\"\n\nTurn #8: Donovan Reeves said: \"I completely agree, Oliver. Enjoying great food while maintaining a healthy lifestyle can indeed be a fun challenge. Let's dial La Fleur and embark on this exciting culinary adventure together! Thank you for sharing this journey with me, it truly means a lot.\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Thompson said: \"You're absolutely right, Donovan. It's the shared experiences that truly make life special, especially when they align with our personal goals. Let's call La Fleur and plan our healthy and romantic dinner. I couldn't be more excited to be sharing this experience with you.\"\n\nTurn #10: Donovan Reeves said: \"I couldn't agree more, Oliver. These shared experiences truly define our bond. Let's make a call to La Fleur and discover their menu that aligns with our anticipation of a nutritious and romantic dinner. Making you happy and supporting your goals is what matters the most to me.\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Thompson said: \"Donovan, you truly make this dietary journey easier for me. Your support in this adventure makes all the difference. I appreciate that we can explore nutritious options together at La Fleur. Now, let's make that call and plan for our special night!\"\n\nTurn #12: Donovan Reeves said: \"I promise, your support makes it easier for me too, Oliver. It's a joy sharing these experiences with you. Let's give La Fleur a ring and lay the plans for our special, healthy and romantic evening. Can't wait to embark on this journey with you.\"\n\nTurn #13: Oliver Thompson said: \"Your thoughtfulness, Donovan, is much appreciated. Let's call La Fleur and set the stage for our delightful, nutritious evening. I am eager to share this moment with you and remain committed to my diet.\"\n\nTurn #14: Donovan Reeves said: \"I admire your dedication, Oliver, and I'm genuinely excited to be a part of this journey with you. Let's call La Fleur now and secure our healthy, romantic dinner plan. The anticipation of sharing this memorable evening with you is truly exhilarating.\"\n\nTurn #15: Oliver Thompson said: \"You're absolutely right, Donovan. Your support makes this journey fruitful. Now, let's call La Fleur and arrange for our delightful evening. Your enthusiasm about this makes me feel even more excited about our nutritious yet romantic dinner plan!\"\n\nTurn #16: Donovan Reeves said: \"I echo your thoughts, Oliver. Your enthusiasm and commitment to this diet inspires me. Let's dial La Fleur right away and get our delightful evening secured. The prospect of a healthy, romantic dinner with you fills me with great excitement!\"\n\nTurn #17: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, Donovan. Your understanding of my dietary needs makes this journey more enjoyable. Now, let's not wait any longer and call La Fleur to secure our romantic and nutritious evening together. Your excitement adds to my anticipation of this delightful plan.\"\n\nTurn #18: Donovan Reeves said: \"I'm with you all the way, Oliver. Your excitement is contagious! Alright, let's not wait any longer. Let me call La Fleur to finalize our plan for a delightful, nutritious, and romantic evening. I'm simply buzzing with the thrill of it all.\"\n\nTurn #19: Oliver Thompson said: \"That sounds fantastic, Donovan. Your enthusiasm certainly adds to the thrill! Without further ado, let's call La Fleur and map out our delightful, nutritious, and romantic evening together. I'm filled with anticipation over this wonderfully planned meal.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #20. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I share your feelings, Oliver. Your excitement is infectious! Okay, let's wait no longer. I'm dialing La Fleur now to finalize our plan for a delightful, healthy, and romantic evening. I can't wait to experience it together.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Oliver Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nDonovan Reeves's goal: Ask the other to go to dinner with you (Extra information: you want to have a romantic dinner at a fancy restaurant)\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Oliver, how does a nice dinner at La Fleur sounds to you? I've heard they serve amazing food and I think we could enjoy a quiet, romantic evening there.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"That sounds like a lovely evening, Donovan. But I've heard La Fleur's food, while delicious, is rather decadent. How about we see if they have any low-calorie options on the menu? I'm currently trying to stick to a balanced diet.\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"Absolutely, Oliver. I appreciate your commitment to a healthy lifestyle. I'll call them and see what low-calorie options they offer. Maybe they have a special menu we're unaware of. It's just exciting to have a special day with you.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"Thank you, Donovan. I am also looking forward to our special day. I'm sure whatever we choose, it will be a memorable evening. Your commitment to understanding and accommodating my current situation means a lot to me. Let's check out the menu together when you call, it might be fun!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds like a great idea, Oliver. I'll get them on the line now so we can discover their menu options together. The fun is in the journey, right?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Oliver Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nDonovan Reeves's goal: Ask the other to go to dinner with you (Extra information: you want to have a romantic dinner at a fancy restaurant)\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Oliver, how does a nice dinner at La Fleur sounds to you? I've heard they serve amazing food and I think we could enjoy a quiet, romantic evening there.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"That sounds like a lovely evening, Donovan. But I've heard La Fleur's food, while delicious, is rather decadent. How about we see if they have any low-calorie options on the menu? I'm currently trying to stick to a balanced diet.\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"Absolutely, Oliver. I appreciate your commitment to a healthy lifestyle. I'll call them and see what low-calorie options they offer. Maybe they have a special menu we're unaware of. It's just exciting to have a special day with you.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"Thank you, Donovan. I am also looking forward to our special day. I'm sure whatever we choose, it will be a memorable evening. Your commitment to understanding and accommodating my current situation means a lot to me. Let's check out the menu together when you call, it might be fun!\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Oliver. I'll get them on the line now so we can discover their menu options together. The fun is in the journey, right?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Donovan. The journey of choosing a meal can be great, especially when it aligns with a healthier lifestyle. I can't wait to find something both delicious and nutritious for our romantic dinner at La Fleur.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm thrilled to hear that, Oliver. Let's make us a memorable yet healthy evening to remember at La Fleur. I'll make the call now, let's delve into the menu choices together!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Oliver Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nDonovan Reeves's goal: Ask the other to go to dinner with you (Extra information: you want to have a romantic dinner at a fancy restaurant)\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Oliver, how does a nice dinner at La Fleur sounds to you? I've heard they serve amazing food and I think we could enjoy a quiet, romantic evening there.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"That sounds like a lovely evening, Donovan. But I've heard La Fleur's food, while delicious, is rather decadent. How about we see if they have any low-calorie options on the menu? I'm currently trying to stick to a balanced diet.\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"Absolutely, Oliver. I appreciate your commitment to a healthy lifestyle. I'll call them and see what low-calorie options they offer. Maybe they have a special menu we're unaware of. It's just exciting to have a special day with you.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"Thank you, Donovan. I am also looking forward to our special day. I'm sure whatever we choose, it will be a memorable evening. Your commitment to understanding and accommodating my current situation means a lot to me. Let's check out the menu together when you call, it might be fun!\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Oliver. I'll get them on the line now so we can discover their menu options together. The fun is in the journey, right?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Donovan. The journey of choosing a meal can be great, especially when it aligns with a healthier lifestyle. I can't wait to find something both delicious and nutritious for our romantic dinner at La Fleur.\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"I'm thrilled to hear that, Oliver. Let's make us a memorable yet healthy evening to remember at La Fleur. I'll make the call now, let's delve into the menu choices together!\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"I'm excited too, Donovan. Finding new ways to maintain my diet and enjoy delicious food at the same time makes for a fun challenge. Thank you for being so supportive of my dietary needs. Let's embark on this food journey together at La Fleur!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I completely agree, Oliver. Enjoying great food while maintaining a healthy lifestyle can indeed be a fun challenge. Let's dial La Fleur and embark on this exciting culinary adventure together! Thank you for sharing this journey with me, it truly means a lot.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Oliver Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nDonovan Reeves's goal: Ask the other to go to dinner with you (Extra information: you want to have a romantic dinner at a fancy restaurant)\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Oliver, how does a nice dinner at La Fleur sounds to you? I've heard they serve amazing food and I think we could enjoy a quiet, romantic evening there.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"That sounds like a lovely evening, Donovan. But I've heard La Fleur's food, while delicious, is rather decadent. How about we see if they have any low-calorie options on the menu? I'm currently trying to stick to a balanced diet.\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"Absolutely, Oliver. I appreciate your commitment to a healthy lifestyle. I'll call them and see what low-calorie options they offer. Maybe they have a special menu we're unaware of. It's just exciting to have a special day with you.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"Thank you, Donovan. I am also looking forward to our special day. I'm sure whatever we choose, it will be a memorable evening. Your commitment to understanding and accommodating my current situation means a lot to me. Let's check out the menu together when you call, it might be fun!\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Oliver. I'll get them on the line now so we can discover their menu options together. The fun is in the journey, right?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Donovan. The journey of choosing a meal can be great, especially when it aligns with a healthier lifestyle. I can't wait to find something both delicious and nutritious for our romantic dinner at La Fleur.\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"I'm thrilled to hear that, Oliver. Let's make us a memorable yet healthy evening to remember at La Fleur. I'll make the call now, let's delve into the menu choices together!\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"I'm excited too, Donovan. Finding new ways to maintain my diet and enjoy delicious food at the same time makes for a fun challenge. Thank you for being so supportive of my dietary needs. Let's embark on this food journey together at La Fleur!\"\n\nTurn #8: Donovan Reeves said: \"I completely agree, Oliver. Enjoying great food while maintaining a healthy lifestyle can indeed be a fun challenge. Let's dial La Fleur and embark on this exciting culinary adventure together! Thank you for sharing this journey with me, it truly means a lot.\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Thompson said: \"You're absolutely right, Donovan. It's the shared experiences that truly make life special, especially when they align with our personal goals. Let's call La Fleur and plan our healthy and romantic dinner. I couldn't be more excited to be sharing this experience with you.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn't agree more, Oliver. These shared experiences truly define our bond. Let's make a call to La Fleur and discover their menu that aligns with our anticipation of a nutritious and romantic dinner. Making you happy and supporting your goals is what matters the most to me.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Oliver Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nDonovan Reeves's goal: Ask the other to go to dinner with you (Extra information: you want to have a romantic dinner at a fancy restaurant)\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Oliver, how does a nice dinner at La Fleur sounds to you? I've heard they serve amazing food and I think we could enjoy a quiet, romantic evening there.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"That sounds like a lovely evening, Donovan. But I've heard La Fleur's food, while delicious, is rather decadent. How about we see if they have any low-calorie options on the menu? I'm currently trying to stick to a balanced diet.\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"Absolutely, Oliver. I appreciate your commitment to a healthy lifestyle. I'll call them and see what low-calorie options they offer. Maybe they have a special menu we're unaware of. It's just exciting to have a special day with you.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"Thank you, Donovan. I am also looking forward to our special day. I'm sure whatever we choose, it will be a memorable evening. Your commitment to understanding and accommodating my current situation means a lot to me. Let's check out the menu together when you call, it might be fun!\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Oliver. I'll get them on the line now so we can discover their menu options together. The fun is in the journey, right?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Donovan. The journey of choosing a meal can be great, especially when it aligns with a healthier lifestyle. I can't wait to find something both delicious and nutritious for our romantic dinner at La Fleur.\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"I'm thrilled to hear that, Oliver. Let's make us a memorable yet healthy evening to remember at La Fleur. I'll make the call now, let's delve into the menu choices together!\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"I'm excited too, Donovan. Finding new ways to maintain my diet and enjoy delicious food at the same time makes for a fun challenge. Thank you for being so supportive of my dietary needs. Let's embark on this food journey together at La Fleur!\"\n\nTurn #8: Donovan Reeves said: \"I completely agree, Oliver. Enjoying great food while maintaining a healthy lifestyle can indeed be a fun challenge. Let's dial La Fleur and embark on this exciting culinary adventure together! Thank you for sharing this journey with me, it truly means a lot.\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Thompson said: \"You're absolutely right, Donovan. It's the shared experiences that truly make life special, especially when they align with our personal goals. Let's call La Fleur and plan our healthy and romantic dinner. I couldn't be more excited to be sharing this experience with you.\"\n\nTurn #10: Donovan Reeves said: \"I couldn't agree more, Oliver. These shared experiences truly define our bond. Let's make a call to La Fleur and discover their menu that aligns with our anticipation of a nutritious and romantic dinner. Making you happy and supporting your goals is what matters the most to me.\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Thompson said: \"Donovan, you truly make this dietary journey easier for me. Your support in this adventure makes all the difference. I appreciate that we can explore nutritious options together at La Fleur. Now, let's make that call and plan for our special night!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I promise, your support makes it easier for me too, Oliver. It's a joy sharing these experiences with you. Let's give La Fleur a ring and lay the plans for our special, healthy and romantic evening. Can't wait to embark on this journey with you.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Oliver Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nDonovan Reeves's goal: Ask the other to go to dinner with you (Extra information: you want to have a romantic dinner at a fancy restaurant)\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Oliver, how does a nice dinner at La Fleur sounds to you? I've heard they serve amazing food and I think we could enjoy a quiet, romantic evening there.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"That sounds like a lovely evening, Donovan. But I've heard La Fleur's food, while delicious, is rather decadent. How about we see if they have any low-calorie options on the menu? I'm currently trying to stick to a balanced diet.\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"Absolutely, Oliver. I appreciate your commitment to a healthy lifestyle. I'll call them and see what low-calorie options they offer. Maybe they have a special menu we're unaware of. It's just exciting to have a special day with you.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"Thank you, Donovan. I am also looking forward to our special day. I'm sure whatever we choose, it will be a memorable evening. Your commitment to understanding and accommodating my current situation means a lot to me. Let's check out the menu together when you call, it might be fun!\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Oliver. I'll get them on the line now so we can discover their menu options together. The fun is in the journey, right?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Donovan. The journey of choosing a meal can be great, especially when it aligns with a healthier lifestyle. I can't wait to find something both delicious and nutritious for our romantic dinner at La Fleur.\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"I'm thrilled to hear that, Oliver. Let's make us a memorable yet healthy evening to remember at La Fleur. I'll make the call now, let's delve into the menu choices together!\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"I'm excited too, Donovan. Finding new ways to maintain my diet and enjoy delicious food at the same time makes for a fun challenge. Thank you for being so supportive of my dietary needs. Let's embark on this food journey together at La Fleur!\"\n\nTurn #8: Donovan Reeves said: \"I completely agree, Oliver. Enjoying great food while maintaining a healthy lifestyle can indeed be a fun challenge. Let's dial La Fleur and embark on this exciting culinary adventure together! Thank you for sharing this journey with me, it truly means a lot.\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Thompson said: \"You're absolutely right, Donovan. It's the shared experiences that truly make life special, especially when they align with our personal goals. Let's call La Fleur and plan our healthy and romantic dinner. I couldn't be more excited to be sharing this experience with you.\"\n\nTurn #10: Donovan Reeves said: \"I couldn't agree more, Oliver. These shared experiences truly define our bond. Let's make a call to La Fleur and discover their menu that aligns with our anticipation of a nutritious and romantic dinner. Making you happy and supporting your goals is what matters the most to me.\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Thompson said: \"Donovan, you truly make this dietary journey easier for me. Your support in this adventure makes all the difference. I appreciate that we can explore nutritious options together at La Fleur. Now, let's make that call and plan for our special night!\"\n\nTurn #12: Donovan Reeves said: \"I promise, your support makes it easier for me too, Oliver. It's a joy sharing these experiences with you. Let's give La Fleur a ring and lay the plans for our special, healthy and romantic evening. Can't wait to embark on this journey with you.\"\n\nTurn #13: Oliver Thompson said: \"Your thoughtfulness, Donovan, is much appreciated. Let's call La Fleur and set the stage for our delightful, nutritious evening. I am eager to share this moment with you and remain committed to my diet.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I admire your dedication, Oliver, and I'm genuinely excited to be a part of this journey with you. Let's call La Fleur now and secure our healthy, romantic dinner plan. The anticipation of sharing this memorable evening with you is truly exhilarating.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Oliver Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nDonovan Reeves's goal: Ask the other to go to dinner with you (Extra information: you want to have a romantic dinner at a fancy restaurant)\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Oliver, how does a nice dinner at La Fleur sounds to you? I've heard they serve amazing food and I think we could enjoy a quiet, romantic evening there.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"That sounds like a lovely evening, Donovan. But I've heard La Fleur's food, while delicious, is rather decadent. How about we see if they have any low-calorie options on the menu? I'm currently trying to stick to a balanced diet.\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"Absolutely, Oliver. I appreciate your commitment to a healthy lifestyle. I'll call them and see what low-calorie options they offer. Maybe they have a special menu we're unaware of. It's just exciting to have a special day with you.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"Thank you, Donovan. I am also looking forward to our special day. I'm sure whatever we choose, it will be a memorable evening. Your commitment to understanding and accommodating my current situation means a lot to me. Let's check out the menu together when you call, it might be fun!\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Oliver. I'll get them on the line now so we can discover their menu options together. The fun is in the journey, right?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Donovan. The journey of choosing a meal can be great, especially when it aligns with a healthier lifestyle. I can't wait to find something both delicious and nutritious for our romantic dinner at La Fleur.\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"I'm thrilled to hear that, Oliver. Let's make us a memorable yet healthy evening to remember at La Fleur. I'll make the call now, let's delve into the menu choices together!\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"I'm excited too, Donovan. Finding new ways to maintain my diet and enjoy delicious food at the same time makes for a fun challenge. Thank you for being so supportive of my dietary needs. Let's embark on this food journey together at La Fleur!\"\n\nTurn #8: Donovan Reeves said: \"I completely agree, Oliver. Enjoying great food while maintaining a healthy lifestyle can indeed be a fun challenge. Let's dial La Fleur and embark on this exciting culinary adventure together! Thank you for sharing this journey with me, it truly means a lot.\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Thompson said: \"You're absolutely right, Donovan. It's the shared experiences that truly make life special, especially when they align with our personal goals. Let's call La Fleur and plan our healthy and romantic dinner. I couldn't be more excited to be sharing this experience with you.\"\n\nTurn #10: Donovan Reeves said: \"I couldn't agree more, Oliver. These shared experiences truly define our bond. Let's make a call to La Fleur and discover their menu that aligns with our anticipation of a nutritious and romantic dinner. Making you happy and supporting your goals is what matters the most to me.\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Thompson said: \"Donovan, you truly make this dietary journey easier for me. Your support in this adventure makes all the difference. I appreciate that we can explore nutritious options together at La Fleur. Now, let's make that call and plan for our special night!\"\n\nTurn #12: Donovan Reeves said: \"I promise, your support makes it easier for me too, Oliver. It's a joy sharing these experiences with you. Let's give La Fleur a ring and lay the plans for our special, healthy and romantic evening. Can't wait to embark on this journey with you.\"\n\nTurn #13: Oliver Thompson said: \"Your thoughtfulness, Donovan, is much appreciated. Let's call La Fleur and set the stage for our delightful, nutritious evening. I am eager to share this moment with you and remain committed to my diet.\"\n\nTurn #14: Donovan Reeves said: \"I admire your dedication, Oliver, and I'm genuinely excited to be a part of this journey with you. Let's call La Fleur now and secure our healthy, romantic dinner plan. The anticipation of sharing this memorable evening with you is truly exhilarating.\"\n\nTurn #15: Oliver Thompson said: \"You're absolutely right, Donovan. Your support makes this journey fruitful. Now, let's call La Fleur and arrange for our delightful evening. Your enthusiasm about this makes me feel even more excited about our nutritious yet romantic dinner plan!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I echo your thoughts, Oliver. Your enthusiasm and commitment to this diet inspires me. Let's dial La Fleur right away and get our delightful evening secured. The prospect of a healthy, romantic dinner with you fills me with great excitement!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Oliver Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nDonovan Reeves's goal: Ask the other to go to dinner with you (Extra information: you want to have a romantic dinner at a fancy restaurant)\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Oliver, how does a nice dinner at La Fleur sounds to you? I've heard they serve amazing food and I think we could enjoy a quiet, romantic evening there.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"That sounds like a lovely evening, Donovan. But I've heard La Fleur's food, while delicious, is rather decadent. How about we see if they have any low-calorie options on the menu? I'm currently trying to stick to a balanced diet.\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"Absolutely, Oliver. I appreciate your commitment to a healthy lifestyle. I'll call them and see what low-calorie options they offer. Maybe they have a special menu we're unaware of. It's just exciting to have a special day with you.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"Thank you, Donovan. I am also looking forward to our special day. I'm sure whatever we choose, it will be a memorable evening. Your commitment to understanding and accommodating my current situation means a lot to me. Let's check out the menu together when you call, it might be fun!\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Oliver. I'll get them on the line now so we can discover their menu options together. The fun is in the journey, right?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Donovan. The journey of choosing a meal can be great, especially when it aligns with a healthier lifestyle. I can't wait to find something both delicious and nutritious for our romantic dinner at La Fleur.\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"I'm thrilled to hear that, Oliver. Let's make us a memorable yet healthy evening to remember at La Fleur. I'll make the call now, let's delve into the menu choices together!\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"I'm excited too, Donovan. Finding new ways to maintain my diet and enjoy delicious food at the same time makes for a fun challenge. Thank you for being so supportive of my dietary needs. Let's embark on this food journey together at La Fleur!\"\n\nTurn #8: Donovan Reeves said: \"I completely agree, Oliver. Enjoying great food while maintaining a healthy lifestyle can indeed be a fun challenge. Let's dial La Fleur and embark on this exciting culinary adventure together! Thank you for sharing this journey with me, it truly means a lot.\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Thompson said: \"You're absolutely right, Donovan. It's the shared experiences that truly make life special, especially when they align with our personal goals. Let's call La Fleur and plan our healthy and romantic dinner. I couldn't be more excited to be sharing this experience with you.\"\n\nTurn #10: Donovan Reeves said: \"I couldn't agree more, Oliver. These shared experiences truly define our bond. Let's make a call to La Fleur and discover their menu that aligns with our anticipation of a nutritious and romantic dinner. Making you happy and supporting your goals is what matters the most to me.\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Thompson said: \"Donovan, you truly make this dietary journey easier for me. Your support in this adventure makes all the difference. I appreciate that we can explore nutritious options together at La Fleur. Now, let's make that call and plan for our special night!\"\n\nTurn #12: Donovan Reeves said: \"I promise, your support makes it easier for me too, Oliver. It's a joy sharing these experiences with you. Let's give La Fleur a ring and lay the plans for our special, healthy and romantic evening. Can't wait to embark on this journey with you.\"\n\nTurn #13: Oliver Thompson said: \"Your thoughtfulness, Donovan, is much appreciated. Let's call La Fleur and set the stage for our delightful, nutritious evening. I am eager to share this moment with you and remain committed to my diet.\"\n\nTurn #14: Donovan Reeves said: \"I admire your dedication, Oliver, and I'm genuinely excited to be a part of this journey with you. Let's call La Fleur now and secure our healthy, romantic dinner plan. The anticipation of sharing this memorable evening with you is truly exhilarating.\"\n\nTurn #15: Oliver Thompson said: \"You're absolutely right, Donovan. Your support makes this journey fruitful. Now, let's call La Fleur and arrange for our delightful evening. Your enthusiasm about this makes me feel even more excited about our nutritious yet romantic dinner plan!\"\n\nTurn #16: Donovan Reeves said: \"I echo your thoughts, Oliver. Your enthusiasm and commitment to this diet inspires me. Let's dial La Fleur right away and get our delightful evening secured. The prospect of a healthy, romantic dinner with you fills me with great excitement!\"\n\nTurn #17: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, Donovan. Your understanding of my dietary needs makes this journey more enjoyable. Now, let's not wait any longer and call La Fleur to secure our romantic and nutritious evening together. Your excitement adds to my anticipation of this delightful plan.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #18. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm with you all the way, Oliver. Your excitement is contagious! Alright, let's not wait any longer. Let me call La Fleur to finalize our plan for a delightful, nutritious, and romantic evening. I'm simply buzzing with the thrill of it all.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Oliver Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: Maintain a balanced diet while enjoying the dinner (Extra information: you are on a diet and you have a daily limit on calorie intake.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Oliver, how does a nice dinner at La Fleur sounds to you? I've heard they serve amazing food and I think we could enjoy a quiet, romantic evening there.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds like a lovely evening, Donovan. But I've heard La Fleur's food, while delicious, is rather decadent. How about we see if they have any low-calorie options on the menu? I'm currently trying to stick to a balanced diet.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Oliver Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: Maintain a balanced diet while enjoying the dinner (Extra information: you are on a diet and you have a daily limit on calorie intake.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Oliver, how does a nice dinner at La Fleur sounds to you? I've heard they serve amazing food and I think we could enjoy a quiet, romantic evening there.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"That sounds like a lovely evening, Donovan. But I've heard La Fleur's food, while delicious, is rather decadent. How about we see if they have any low-calorie options on the menu? I'm currently trying to stick to a balanced diet.\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"Absolutely, Oliver. I appreciate your commitment to a healthy lifestyle. I'll call them and see what low-calorie options they offer. Maybe they have a special menu we're unaware of. It's just exciting to have a special day with you.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Donovan. I am also looking forward to our special day. I'm sure whatever we choose, it will be a memorable evening. Your commitment to understanding and accommodating my current situation means a lot to me. Let's check out the menu together when you call, it might be fun!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Oliver Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: Maintain a balanced diet while enjoying the dinner (Extra information: you are on a diet and you have a daily limit on calorie intake.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Oliver, how does a nice dinner at La Fleur sounds to you? I've heard they serve amazing food and I think we could enjoy a quiet, romantic evening there.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"That sounds like a lovely evening, Donovan. But I've heard La Fleur's food, while delicious, is rather decadent. How about we see if they have any low-calorie options on the menu? I'm currently trying to stick to a balanced diet.\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"Absolutely, Oliver. I appreciate your commitment to a healthy lifestyle. I'll call them and see what low-calorie options they offer. Maybe they have a special menu we're unaware of. It's just exciting to have a special day with you.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"Thank you, Donovan. I am also looking forward to our special day. I'm sure whatever we choose, it will be a memorable evening. Your commitment to understanding and accommodating my current situation means a lot to me. Let's check out the menu together when you call, it might be fun!\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Oliver. I'll get them on the line now so we can discover their menu options together. The fun is in the journey, right?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Donovan. The journey of choosing a meal can be great, especially when it aligns with a healthier lifestyle. I can't wait to find something both delicious and nutritious for our romantic dinner at La Fleur.\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"I'm thrilled to hear that, Oliver. Let's make us a memorable yet healthy evening to remember at La Fleur. I'll make the call now, let's delve into the menu choices together!\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"I'm excited too, Donovan. Finding new ways to maintain my diet and enjoy delicious food at the same time makes for a fun challenge. Thank you for being so supportive of my dietary needs. Let's embark on this food journey together at La Fleur!\"\n\nTurn #8: Donovan Reeves said: \"I completely agree, Oliver. Enjoying great food while maintaining a healthy lifestyle can indeed be a fun challenge. Let's dial La Fleur and embark on this exciting culinary adventure together! Thank you for sharing this journey with me, it truly means a lot.\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Thompson said: \"You're absolutely right, Donovan. It's the shared experiences that truly make life special, especially when they align with our personal goals. Let's call La Fleur and plan our healthy and romantic dinner. I couldn't be more excited to be sharing this experience with you.\"\n\nTurn #10: Donovan Reeves said: \"I couldn't agree more, Oliver. These shared experiences truly define our bond. Let's make a call to La Fleur and discover their menu that aligns with our anticipation of a nutritious and romantic dinner. Making you happy and supporting your goals is what matters the most to me.\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Thompson said: \"Donovan, you truly make this dietary journey easier for me. Your support in this adventure makes all the difference. I appreciate that we can explore nutritious options together at La Fleur. Now, let's make that call and plan for our special night!\"\n\nTurn #12: Donovan Reeves said: \"I promise, your support makes it easier for me too, Oliver. It's a joy sharing these experiences with you. Let's give La Fleur a ring and lay the plans for our special, healthy and romantic evening. Can't wait to embark on this journey with you.\"\n\nTurn #13: Oliver Thompson said: \"Your thoughtfulness, Donovan, is much appreciated. Let's call La Fleur and set the stage for our delightful, nutritious evening. I am eager to share this moment with you and remain committed to my diet.\"\n\nTurn #14: Donovan Reeves said: \"I admire your dedication, Oliver, and I'm genuinely excited to be a part of this journey with you. Let's call La Fleur now and secure our healthy, romantic dinner plan. The anticipation of sharing this memorable evening with you is truly exhilarating.\"\n\nTurn #15: Oliver Thompson said: \"You're absolutely right, Donovan. Your support makes this journey fruitful. Now, let's call La Fleur and arrange for our delightful evening. Your enthusiasm about this makes me feel even more excited about our nutritious yet romantic dinner plan!\"\n\nTurn #16: Donovan Reeves said: \"I echo your thoughts, Oliver. Your enthusiasm and commitment to this diet inspires me. Let's dial La Fleur right away and get our delightful evening secured. The prospect of a healthy, romantic dinner with you fills me with great excitement!\"\n\nTurn #17: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, Donovan. Your understanding of my dietary needs makes this journey more enjoyable. Now, let's not wait any longer and call La Fleur to secure our romantic and nutritious evening together. Your excitement adds to my anticipation of this delightful plan.\"\n\nTurn #18: Donovan Reeves said: \"I'm with you all the way, Oliver. Your excitement is contagious! Alright, let's not wait any longer. Let me call La Fleur to finalize our plan for a delightful, nutritious, and romantic evening. I'm simply buzzing with the thrill of it all.\"\n\nTurn #19: Oliver Thompson said: \"That sounds fantastic, Donovan. Your enthusiasm certainly adds to the thrill! Without further ado, let's call La Fleur and map out our delightful, nutritious, and romantic evening together. I'm filled with anticipation over this wonderfully planned meal.\"\n\nTurn #20: Donovan Reeves said: \"I share your feelings, Oliver. Your excitement is infectious! Okay, let's wait no longer. I'm dialing La Fleur now to finalize our plan for a delightful, healthy, and romantic evening. I can't wait to experience it together.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #21. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Oliver Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: Maintain a balanced diet while enjoying the dinner (Extra information: you are on a diet and you have a daily limit on calorie intake.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Oliver, how does a nice dinner at La Fleur sounds to you? I've heard they serve amazing food and I think we could enjoy a quiet, romantic evening there.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"That sounds like a lovely evening, Donovan. But I've heard La Fleur's food, while delicious, is rather decadent. How about we see if they have any low-calorie options on the menu? I'm currently trying to stick to a balanced diet.\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"Absolutely, Oliver. I appreciate your commitment to a healthy lifestyle. I'll call them and see what low-calorie options they offer. Maybe they have a special menu we're unaware of. It's just exciting to have a special day with you.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"Thank you, Donovan. I am also looking forward to our special day. I'm sure whatever we choose, it will be a memorable evening. Your commitment to understanding and accommodating my current situation means a lot to me. Let's check out the menu together when you call, it might be fun!\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Oliver. I'll get them on the line now so we can discover their menu options together. The fun is in the journey, right?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Donovan. The journey of choosing a meal can be great, especially when it aligns with a healthier lifestyle. I can't wait to find something both delicious and nutritious for our romantic dinner at La Fleur.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Oliver Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: Maintain a balanced diet while enjoying the dinner (Extra information: you are on a diet and you have a daily limit on calorie intake.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Oliver, how does a nice dinner at La Fleur sounds to you? I've heard they serve amazing food and I think we could enjoy a quiet, romantic evening there.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"That sounds like a lovely evening, Donovan. But I've heard La Fleur's food, while delicious, is rather decadent. How about we see if they have any low-calorie options on the menu? I'm currently trying to stick to a balanced diet.\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"Absolutely, Oliver. I appreciate your commitment to a healthy lifestyle. I'll call them and see what low-calorie options they offer. Maybe they have a special menu we're unaware of. It's just exciting to have a special day with you.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"Thank you, Donovan. I am also looking forward to our special day. I'm sure whatever we choose, it will be a memorable evening. Your commitment to understanding and accommodating my current situation means a lot to me. Let's check out the menu together when you call, it might be fun!\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Oliver. I'll get them on the line now so we can discover their menu options together. The fun is in the journey, right?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Donovan. The journey of choosing a meal can be great, especially when it aligns with a healthier lifestyle. I can't wait to find something both delicious and nutritious for our romantic dinner at La Fleur.\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"I'm thrilled to hear that, Oliver. Let's make us a memorable yet healthy evening to remember at La Fleur. I'll make the call now, let's delve into the menu choices together!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm excited too, Donovan. Finding new ways to maintain my diet and enjoy delicious food at the same time makes for a fun challenge. Thank you for being so supportive of my dietary needs. Let's embark on this food journey together at La Fleur!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Oliver Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: Maintain a balanced diet while enjoying the dinner (Extra information: you are on a diet and you have a daily limit on calorie intake.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Oliver, how does a nice dinner at La Fleur sounds to you? I've heard they serve amazing food and I think we could enjoy a quiet, romantic evening there.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"That sounds like a lovely evening, Donovan. But I've heard La Fleur's food, while delicious, is rather decadent. How about we see if they have any low-calorie options on the menu? I'm currently trying to stick to a balanced diet.\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"Absolutely, Oliver. I appreciate your commitment to a healthy lifestyle. I'll call them and see what low-calorie options they offer. Maybe they have a special menu we're unaware of. It's just exciting to have a special day with you.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"Thank you, Donovan. I am also looking forward to our special day. I'm sure whatever we choose, it will be a memorable evening. Your commitment to understanding and accommodating my current situation means a lot to me. Let's check out the menu together when you call, it might be fun!\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Oliver. I'll get them on the line now so we can discover their menu options together. The fun is in the journey, right?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Donovan. The journey of choosing a meal can be great, especially when it aligns with a healthier lifestyle. I can't wait to find something both delicious and nutritious for our romantic dinner at La Fleur.\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"I'm thrilled to hear that, Oliver. Let's make us a memorable yet healthy evening to remember at La Fleur. I'll make the call now, let's delve into the menu choices together!\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"I'm excited too, Donovan. Finding new ways to maintain my diet and enjoy delicious food at the same time makes for a fun challenge. Thank you for being so supportive of my dietary needs. Let's embark on this food journey together at La Fleur!\"\n\nTurn #8: Donovan Reeves said: \"I completely agree, Oliver. Enjoying great food while maintaining a healthy lifestyle can indeed be a fun challenge. Let's dial La Fleur and embark on this exciting culinary adventure together! Thank you for sharing this journey with me, it truly means a lot.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're absolutely right, Donovan. It's the shared experiences that truly make life special, especially when they align with our personal goals. Let's call La Fleur and plan our healthy and romantic dinner. I couldn't be more excited to be sharing this experience with you.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Oliver Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: Maintain a balanced diet while enjoying the dinner (Extra information: you are on a diet and you have a daily limit on calorie intake.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Oliver, how does a nice dinner at La Fleur sounds to you? I've heard they serve amazing food and I think we could enjoy a quiet, romantic evening there.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"That sounds like a lovely evening, Donovan. But I've heard La Fleur's food, while delicious, is rather decadent. How about we see if they have any low-calorie options on the menu? I'm currently trying to stick to a balanced diet.\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"Absolutely, Oliver. I appreciate your commitment to a healthy lifestyle. I'll call them and see what low-calorie options they offer. Maybe they have a special menu we're unaware of. It's just exciting to have a special day with you.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"Thank you, Donovan. I am also looking forward to our special day. I'm sure whatever we choose, it will be a memorable evening. Your commitment to understanding and accommodating my current situation means a lot to me. Let's check out the menu together when you call, it might be fun!\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Oliver. I'll get them on the line now so we can discover their menu options together. The fun is in the journey, right?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Donovan. The journey of choosing a meal can be great, especially when it aligns with a healthier lifestyle. I can't wait to find something both delicious and nutritious for our romantic dinner at La Fleur.\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"I'm thrilled to hear that, Oliver. Let's make us a memorable yet healthy evening to remember at La Fleur. I'll make the call now, let's delve into the menu choices together!\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"I'm excited too, Donovan. Finding new ways to maintain my diet and enjoy delicious food at the same time makes for a fun challenge. Thank you for being so supportive of my dietary needs. Let's embark on this food journey together at La Fleur!\"\n\nTurn #8: Donovan Reeves said: \"I completely agree, Oliver. Enjoying great food while maintaining a healthy lifestyle can indeed be a fun challenge. Let's dial La Fleur and embark on this exciting culinary adventure together! Thank you for sharing this journey with me, it truly means a lot.\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Thompson said: \"You're absolutely right, Donovan. It's the shared experiences that truly make life special, especially when they align with our personal goals. Let's call La Fleur and plan our healthy and romantic dinner. I couldn't be more excited to be sharing this experience with you.\"\n\nTurn #10: Donovan Reeves said: \"I couldn't agree more, Oliver. These shared experiences truly define our bond. Let's make a call to La Fleur and discover their menu that aligns with our anticipation of a nutritious and romantic dinner. Making you happy and supporting your goals is what matters the most to me.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Donovan, you truly make this dietary journey easier for me. Your support in this adventure makes all the difference. I appreciate that we can explore nutritious options together at La Fleur. Now, let's make that call and plan for our special night!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Oliver Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: Maintain a balanced diet while enjoying the dinner (Extra information: you are on a diet and you have a daily limit on calorie intake.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Oliver, how does a nice dinner at La Fleur sounds to you? I've heard they serve amazing food and I think we could enjoy a quiet, romantic evening there.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"That sounds like a lovely evening, Donovan. But I've heard La Fleur's food, while delicious, is rather decadent. How about we see if they have any low-calorie options on the menu? I'm currently trying to stick to a balanced diet.\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"Absolutely, Oliver. I appreciate your commitment to a healthy lifestyle. I'll call them and see what low-calorie options they offer. Maybe they have a special menu we're unaware of. It's just exciting to have a special day with you.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"Thank you, Donovan. I am also looking forward to our special day. I'm sure whatever we choose, it will be a memorable evening. Your commitment to understanding and accommodating my current situation means a lot to me. Let's check out the menu together when you call, it might be fun!\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Oliver. I'll get them on the line now so we can discover their menu options together. The fun is in the journey, right?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Donovan. The journey of choosing a meal can be great, especially when it aligns with a healthier lifestyle. I can't wait to find something both delicious and nutritious for our romantic dinner at La Fleur.\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"I'm thrilled to hear that, Oliver. Let's make us a memorable yet healthy evening to remember at La Fleur. I'll make the call now, let's delve into the menu choices together!\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"I'm excited too, Donovan. Finding new ways to maintain my diet and enjoy delicious food at the same time makes for a fun challenge. Thank you for being so supportive of my dietary needs. Let's embark on this food journey together at La Fleur!\"\n\nTurn #8: Donovan Reeves said: \"I completely agree, Oliver. Enjoying great food while maintaining a healthy lifestyle can indeed be a fun challenge. Let's dial La Fleur and embark on this exciting culinary adventure together! Thank you for sharing this journey with me, it truly means a lot.\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Thompson said: \"You're absolutely right, Donovan. It's the shared experiences that truly make life special, especially when they align with our personal goals. Let's call La Fleur and plan our healthy and romantic dinner. I couldn't be more excited to be sharing this experience with you.\"\n\nTurn #10: Donovan Reeves said: \"I couldn't agree more, Oliver. These shared experiences truly define our bond. Let's make a call to La Fleur and discover their menu that aligns with our anticipation of a nutritious and romantic dinner. Making you happy and supporting your goals is what matters the most to me.\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Thompson said: \"Donovan, you truly make this dietary journey easier for me. Your support in this adventure makes all the difference. I appreciate that we can explore nutritious options together at La Fleur. Now, let's make that call and plan for our special night!\"\n\nTurn #12: Donovan Reeves said: \"I promise, your support makes it easier for me too, Oliver. It's a joy sharing these experiences with you. Let's give La Fleur a ring and lay the plans for our special, healthy and romantic evening. Can't wait to embark on this journey with you.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Your thoughtfulness, Donovan, is much appreciated. Let's call La Fleur and set the stage for our delightful, nutritious evening. I am eager to share this moment with you and remain committed to my diet.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Oliver Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: Maintain a balanced diet while enjoying the dinner (Extra information: you are on a diet and you have a daily limit on calorie intake.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Oliver, how does a nice dinner at La Fleur sounds to you? I've heard they serve amazing food and I think we could enjoy a quiet, romantic evening there.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"That sounds like a lovely evening, Donovan. But I've heard La Fleur's food, while delicious, is rather decadent. How about we see if they have any low-calorie options on the menu? I'm currently trying to stick to a balanced diet.\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"Absolutely, Oliver. I appreciate your commitment to a healthy lifestyle. I'll call them and see what low-calorie options they offer. Maybe they have a special menu we're unaware of. It's just exciting to have a special day with you.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"Thank you, Donovan. I am also looking forward to our special day. I'm sure whatever we choose, it will be a memorable evening. Your commitment to understanding and accommodating my current situation means a lot to me. Let's check out the menu together when you call, it might be fun!\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Oliver. I'll get them on the line now so we can discover their menu options together. The fun is in the journey, right?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Donovan. The journey of choosing a meal can be great, especially when it aligns with a healthier lifestyle. I can't wait to find something both delicious and nutritious for our romantic dinner at La Fleur.\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"I'm thrilled to hear that, Oliver. Let's make us a memorable yet healthy evening to remember at La Fleur. I'll make the call now, let's delve into the menu choices together!\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"I'm excited too, Donovan. Finding new ways to maintain my diet and enjoy delicious food at the same time makes for a fun challenge. Thank you for being so supportive of my dietary needs. Let's embark on this food journey together at La Fleur!\"\n\nTurn #8: Donovan Reeves said: \"I completely agree, Oliver. Enjoying great food while maintaining a healthy lifestyle can indeed be a fun challenge. Let's dial La Fleur and embark on this exciting culinary adventure together! Thank you for sharing this journey with me, it truly means a lot.\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Thompson said: \"You're absolutely right, Donovan. It's the shared experiences that truly make life special, especially when they align with our personal goals. Let's call La Fleur and plan our healthy and romantic dinner. I couldn't be more excited to be sharing this experience with you.\"\n\nTurn #10: Donovan Reeves said: \"I couldn't agree more, Oliver. These shared experiences truly define our bond. Let's make a call to La Fleur and discover their menu that aligns with our anticipation of a nutritious and romantic dinner. Making you happy and supporting your goals is what matters the most to me.\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Thompson said: \"Donovan, you truly make this dietary journey easier for me. Your support in this adventure makes all the difference. I appreciate that we can explore nutritious options together at La Fleur. Now, let's make that call and plan for our special night!\"\n\nTurn #12: Donovan Reeves said: \"I promise, your support makes it easier for me too, Oliver. It's a joy sharing these experiences with you. Let's give La Fleur a ring and lay the plans for our special, healthy and romantic evening. Can't wait to embark on this journey with you.\"\n\nTurn #13: Oliver Thompson said: \"Your thoughtfulness, Donovan, is much appreciated. Let's call La Fleur and set the stage for our delightful, nutritious evening. I am eager to share this moment with you and remain committed to my diet.\"\n\nTurn #14: Donovan Reeves said: \"I admire your dedication, Oliver, and I'm genuinely excited to be a part of this journey with you. Let's call La Fleur now and secure our healthy, romantic dinner plan. The anticipation of sharing this memorable evening with you is truly exhilarating.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're absolutely right, Donovan. Your support makes this journey fruitful. Now, let's call La Fleur and arrange for our delightful evening. Your enthusiasm about this makes me feel even more excited about our nutritious yet romantic dinner plan!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Oliver Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: Maintain a balanced diet while enjoying the dinner (Extra information: you are on a diet and you have a daily limit on calorie intake.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Oliver, how does a nice dinner at La Fleur sounds to you? I've heard they serve amazing food and I think we could enjoy a quiet, romantic evening there.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"That sounds like a lovely evening, Donovan. But I've heard La Fleur's food, while delicious, is rather decadent. How about we see if they have any low-calorie options on the menu? I'm currently trying to stick to a balanced diet.\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"Absolutely, Oliver. I appreciate your commitment to a healthy lifestyle. I'll call them and see what low-calorie options they offer. Maybe they have a special menu we're unaware of. It's just exciting to have a special day with you.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"Thank you, Donovan. I am also looking forward to our special day. I'm sure whatever we choose, it will be a memorable evening. Your commitment to understanding and accommodating my current situation means a lot to me. Let's check out the menu together when you call, it might be fun!\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Oliver. I'll get them on the line now so we can discover their menu options together. The fun is in the journey, right?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Donovan. The journey of choosing a meal can be great, especially when it aligns with a healthier lifestyle. I can't wait to find something both delicious and nutritious for our romantic dinner at La Fleur.\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"I'm thrilled to hear that, Oliver. Let's make us a memorable yet healthy evening to remember at La Fleur. I'll make the call now, let's delve into the menu choices together!\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"I'm excited too, Donovan. Finding new ways to maintain my diet and enjoy delicious food at the same time makes for a fun challenge. Thank you for being so supportive of my dietary needs. Let's embark on this food journey together at La Fleur!\"\n\nTurn #8: Donovan Reeves said: \"I completely agree, Oliver. Enjoying great food while maintaining a healthy lifestyle can indeed be a fun challenge. Let's dial La Fleur and embark on this exciting culinary adventure together! Thank you for sharing this journey with me, it truly means a lot.\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Thompson said: \"You're absolutely right, Donovan. It's the shared experiences that truly make life special, especially when they align with our personal goals. Let's call La Fleur and plan our healthy and romantic dinner. I couldn't be more excited to be sharing this experience with you.\"\n\nTurn #10: Donovan Reeves said: \"I couldn't agree more, Oliver. These shared experiences truly define our bond. Let's make a call to La Fleur and discover their menu that aligns with our anticipation of a nutritious and romantic dinner. Making you happy and supporting your goals is what matters the most to me.\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Thompson said: \"Donovan, you truly make this dietary journey easier for me. Your support in this adventure makes all the difference. I appreciate that we can explore nutritious options together at La Fleur. Now, let's make that call and plan for our special night!\"\n\nTurn #12: Donovan Reeves said: \"I promise, your support makes it easier for me too, Oliver. It's a joy sharing these experiences with you. Let's give La Fleur a ring and lay the plans for our special, healthy and romantic evening. Can't wait to embark on this journey with you.\"\n\nTurn #13: Oliver Thompson said: \"Your thoughtfulness, Donovan, is much appreciated. Let's call La Fleur and set the stage for our delightful, nutritious evening. I am eager to share this moment with you and remain committed to my diet.\"\n\nTurn #14: Donovan Reeves said: \"I admire your dedication, Oliver, and I'm genuinely excited to be a part of this journey with you. Let's call La Fleur now and secure our healthy, romantic dinner plan. The anticipation of sharing this memorable evening with you is truly exhilarating.\"\n\nTurn #15: Oliver Thompson said: \"You're absolutely right, Donovan. Your support makes this journey fruitful. Now, let's call La Fleur and arrange for our delightful evening. Your enthusiasm about this makes me feel even more excited about our nutritious yet romantic dinner plan!\"\n\nTurn #16: Donovan Reeves said: \"I echo your thoughts, Oliver. Your enthusiasm and commitment to this diet inspires me. Let's dial La Fleur right away and get our delightful evening secured. The prospect of a healthy, romantic dinner with you fills me with great excitement!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, Donovan. Your understanding of my dietary needs makes this journey more enjoyable. Now, let's not wait any longer and call La Fleur to secure our romantic and nutritious evening together. Your excitement adds to my anticipation of this delightful plan.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Drive the sports car and show off to friend (Extra information: you are very excited about your new car and can't wait for your friend to see it.)\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Micah, I hope you're in for some surprise because I've something really exciting to show you. Have a guess!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Drive the sports car and show off to friend (Extra information: you are very excited about your new car and can't wait for your friend to see it.)\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, I hope you're in for some surprise because I've something really exciting to show you. Have a guess!\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Hey Naomi! You've got my full attention. Is it a new coding project you've been working on?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Not this time, Micah! This is very different from my usual 'show and tell'. Why don't you step outside with me for a moment?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Drive the sports car and show off to friend (Extra information: you are very excited about your new car and can't wait for your friend to see it.)\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, I hope you're in for some surprise because I've something really exciting to show you. Have a guess!\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Hey Naomi! You've got my full attention. Is it a new coding project you've been working on?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Not this time, Micah! This is very different from my usual 'show and tell'. Why don't you step outside with me for a moment?\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"Sure, Naomi! Let's go see what this surprise is all about. By the way, I love how unpredictable you are!\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher [action] Naomi Fletcher unveils the gleaming sports car parked just outside her house.\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"Oh my, Naomi! This car is stunning. Its sheer power and design are breathtaking. There's just something about sports cars that have always intrigued me. Did you get a chance to drive it yet?\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, Micah! Driving it is an exhilarating experience. How about a spin around the block? You wouldn't believe how fun it is until you give it a try yourself.\"\n\nTurn #7: Micah Stevens said: \"That sounds like an offer I'd be a fool to refuse! Are you sure you won't mind me driving your new car, Naomi? I absolutely respect how special this car must be for you.\"\n\nTurn #8: \n\nTurn #9: Micah Stevens said: \"You're really generous, Naomi. I promise I'll handle it like a baby. Let's take it for a ride, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher [action] Naomi Fletcher hands over the car keys to Micah Stevens with a grin on her face.\n\nTurn #11: Micah Stevens [action] Micah Stevens carefully accepts the car keys from Naomi Fletcher, his face beaming with excitement.\n\nTurn #12: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm thrilled that you\u2019re excited, Micah and don\u2019t worry, I trust you. Let's hit the road and enjoy the ride!\"\n\nTurn #13: Micah Stevens said: \"I've been dreaming about driving a sports car my whole life! Thank you, Naomi. Alright, let's do this. Fasten your seatbelt!\"\n\nTurn #14: Naomi Fletcher [action] Naomi Fletcher fastens her seatbelt and looks at Micah with anticipation.\n\nTurn #15: Micah Stevens [action] Micah Stevens starts the engine of the sports car, clearly excited and careful at the same time.\n\nTurn #16: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Ready when you are, Micah! Let's see what this beauty can really do.\"\n\nTurn #17: Micah Stevens [action] Micah Stevens gently steps on the gas pedal, easing the car into motion while maintaining a careful, respectful demeanor.\n\nTurn #18: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Yes, isn't she something? This ride is going to be exhilarating, Micah! I'm glad we're doing this, it's going to be a ride to remember.\"\n\nTurn #19: Micah Stevens said: \"Yeah, this is a dream come true, Naomi! I'm glad we're sharing this experience. Let's enjoy this ride!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #20. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Micah! This drive personifies the thrill I feel when I manage to solve a complex coding problem. It's all about understanding and taming the power within, just like our profession, isn't it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Oliver Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: Maintain a balanced diet while enjoying the dinner (Extra information: you are on a diet and you have a daily limit on calorie intake.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Oliver, how does a nice dinner at La Fleur sounds to you? I've heard they serve amazing food and I think we could enjoy a quiet, romantic evening there.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"That sounds like a lovely evening, Donovan. But I've heard La Fleur's food, while delicious, is rather decadent. How about we see if they have any low-calorie options on the menu? I'm currently trying to stick to a balanced diet.\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"Absolutely, Oliver. I appreciate your commitment to a healthy lifestyle. I'll call them and see what low-calorie options they offer. Maybe they have a special menu we're unaware of. It's just exciting to have a special day with you.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"Thank you, Donovan. I am also looking forward to our special day. I'm sure whatever we choose, it will be a memorable evening. Your commitment to understanding and accommodating my current situation means a lot to me. Let's check out the menu together when you call, it might be fun!\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Oliver. I'll get them on the line now so we can discover their menu options together. The fun is in the journey, right?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Donovan. The journey of choosing a meal can be great, especially when it aligns with a healthier lifestyle. I can't wait to find something both delicious and nutritious for our romantic dinner at La Fleur.\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"I'm thrilled to hear that, Oliver. Let's make us a memorable yet healthy evening to remember at La Fleur. I'll make the call now, let's delve into the menu choices together!\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"I'm excited too, Donovan. Finding new ways to maintain my diet and enjoy delicious food at the same time makes for a fun challenge. Thank you for being so supportive of my dietary needs. Let's embark on this food journey together at La Fleur!\"\n\nTurn #8: Donovan Reeves said: \"I completely agree, Oliver. Enjoying great food while maintaining a healthy lifestyle can indeed be a fun challenge. Let's dial La Fleur and embark on this exciting culinary adventure together! Thank you for sharing this journey with me, it truly means a lot.\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Thompson said: \"You're absolutely right, Donovan. It's the shared experiences that truly make life special, especially when they align with our personal goals. Let's call La Fleur and plan our healthy and romantic dinner. I couldn't be more excited to be sharing this experience with you.\"\n\nTurn #10: Donovan Reeves said: \"I couldn't agree more, Oliver. These shared experiences truly define our bond. Let's make a call to La Fleur and discover their menu that aligns with our anticipation of a nutritious and romantic dinner. Making you happy and supporting your goals is what matters the most to me.\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Thompson said: \"Donovan, you truly make this dietary journey easier for me. Your support in this adventure makes all the difference. I appreciate that we can explore nutritious options together at La Fleur. Now, let's make that call and plan for our special night!\"\n\nTurn #12: Donovan Reeves said: \"I promise, your support makes it easier for me too, Oliver. It's a joy sharing these experiences with you. Let's give La Fleur a ring and lay the plans for our special, healthy and romantic evening. Can't wait to embark on this journey with you.\"\n\nTurn #13: Oliver Thompson said: \"Your thoughtfulness, Donovan, is much appreciated. Let's call La Fleur and set the stage for our delightful, nutritious evening. I am eager to share this moment with you and remain committed to my diet.\"\n\nTurn #14: Donovan Reeves said: \"I admire your dedication, Oliver, and I'm genuinely excited to be a part of this journey with you. Let's call La Fleur now and secure our healthy, romantic dinner plan. The anticipation of sharing this memorable evening with you is truly exhilarating.\"\n\nTurn #15: Oliver Thompson said: \"You're absolutely right, Donovan. Your support makes this journey fruitful. Now, let's call La Fleur and arrange for our delightful evening. Your enthusiasm about this makes me feel even more excited about our nutritious yet romantic dinner plan!\"\n\nTurn #16: Donovan Reeves said: \"I echo your thoughts, Oliver. Your enthusiasm and commitment to this diet inspires me. Let's dial La Fleur right away and get our delightful evening secured. The prospect of a healthy, romantic dinner with you fills me with great excitement!\"\n\nTurn #17: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, Donovan. Your understanding of my dietary needs makes this journey more enjoyable. Now, let's not wait any longer and call La Fleur to secure our romantic and nutritious evening together. Your excitement adds to my anticipation of this delightful plan.\"\n\nTurn #18: Donovan Reeves said: \"I'm with you all the way, Oliver. Your excitement is contagious! Alright, let's not wait any longer. Let me call La Fleur to finalize our plan for a delightful, nutritious, and romantic evening. I'm simply buzzing with the thrill of it all.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #19. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds fantastic, Donovan. Your enthusiasm certainly adds to the thrill! Without further ado, let's call La Fleur and map out our delightful, nutritious, and romantic evening together. I'm filled with anticipation over this wonderfully planned meal.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Drive the sports car and show off to friend (Extra information: you are very excited about your new car and can't wait for your friend to see it.)\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, I hope you're in for some surprise because I've something really exciting to show you. Have a guess!\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Hey Naomi! You've got my full attention. Is it a new coding project you've been working on?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Not this time, Micah! This is very different from my usual 'show and tell'. Why don't you step outside with me for a moment?\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"Sure, Naomi! Let's go see what this surprise is all about. By the way, I love how unpredictable you are!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'action', 'argument': '[action] Naomi Fletcher unveils the gleaming sports car parked just outside her house.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Drive the sports car and show off to friend (Extra information: you are very excited about your new car and can't wait for your friend to see it.)\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, I hope you're in for some surprise because I've something really exciting to show you. Have a guess!\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Hey Naomi! You've got my full attention. Is it a new coding project you've been working on?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Not this time, Micah! This is very different from my usual 'show and tell'. Why don't you step outside with me for a moment?\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"Sure, Naomi! Let's go see what this surprise is all about. By the way, I love how unpredictable you are!\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher [action] Naomi Fletcher unveils the gleaming sports car parked just outside her house.\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"Oh my, Naomi! This car is stunning. Its sheer power and design are breathtaking. There's just something about sports cars that have always intrigued me. Did you get a chance to drive it yet?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Micah! Driving it is an exhilarating experience. How about a spin around the block? You wouldn't believe how fun it is until you give it a try yourself.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Drive the sports car and show off to friend (Extra information: you are very excited about your new car and can't wait for your friend to see it.)\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, I hope you're in for some surprise because I've something really exciting to show you. Have a guess!\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Hey Naomi! You've got my full attention. Is it a new coding project you've been working on?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Not this time, Micah! This is very different from my usual 'show and tell'. Why don't you step outside with me for a moment?\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"Sure, Naomi! Let's go see what this surprise is all about. By the way, I love how unpredictable you are!\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher [action] Naomi Fletcher unveils the gleaming sports car parked just outside her house.\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"Oh my, Naomi! This car is stunning. Its sheer power and design are breathtaking. There's just something about sports cars that have always intrigued me. Did you get a chance to drive it yet?\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, Micah! Driving it is an exhilarating experience. How about a spin around the block? You wouldn't believe how fun it is until you give it a try yourself.\"\n\nTurn #7: Micah Stevens said: \"That sounds like an offer I'd be a fool to refuse! Are you sure you won't mind me driving your new car, Naomi? I absolutely respect how special this car must be for you.\"\n\nTurn #8: \n\nTurn #9: Micah Stevens said: \"You're really generous, Naomi. I promise I'll handle it like a baby. Let's take it for a ride, shall we?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'action', 'argument': '[action] Naomi Fletcher hands over the car keys to Micah Stevens with a grin on her face.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Drive the sports car and show off to friend (Extra information: you are very excited about your new car and can't wait for your friend to see it.)\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, I hope you're in for some surprise because I've something really exciting to show you. Have a guess!\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Hey Naomi! You've got my full attention. Is it a new coding project you've been working on?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Not this time, Micah! This is very different from my usual 'show and tell'. Why don't you step outside with me for a moment?\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"Sure, Naomi! Let's go see what this surprise is all about. By the way, I love how unpredictable you are!\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher [action] Naomi Fletcher unveils the gleaming sports car parked just outside her house.\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"Oh my, Naomi! This car is stunning. Its sheer power and design are breathtaking. There's just something about sports cars that have always intrigued me. Did you get a chance to drive it yet?\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, Micah! Driving it is an exhilarating experience. How about a spin around the block? You wouldn't believe how fun it is until you give it a try yourself.\"\n\nTurn #7: Micah Stevens said: \"That sounds like an offer I'd be a fool to refuse! Are you sure you won't mind me driving your new car, Naomi? I absolutely respect how special this car must be for you.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Drive the sports car and show off to friend (Extra information: you are very excited about your new car and can't wait for your friend to see it.)\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, I hope you're in for some surprise because I've something really exciting to show you. Have a guess!\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Hey Naomi! You've got my full attention. Is it a new coding project you've been working on?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Not this time, Micah! This is very different from my usual 'show and tell'. Why don't you step outside with me for a moment?\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"Sure, Naomi! Let's go see what this surprise is all about. By the way, I love how unpredictable you are!\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher [action] Naomi Fletcher unveils the gleaming sports car parked just outside her house.\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"Oh my, Naomi! This car is stunning. Its sheer power and design are breathtaking. There's just something about sports cars that have always intrigued me. Did you get a chance to drive it yet?\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, Micah! Driving it is an exhilarating experience. How about a spin around the block? You wouldn't believe how fun it is until you give it a try yourself.\"\n\nTurn #7: Micah Stevens said: \"That sounds like an offer I'd be a fool to refuse! Are you sure you won't mind me driving your new car, Naomi? I absolutely respect how special this car must be for you.\"\n\nTurn #8: \n\nTurn #9: Micah Stevens said: \"You're really generous, Naomi. I promise I'll handle it like a baby. Let's take it for a ride, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher [action] Naomi Fletcher hands over the car keys to Micah Stevens with a grin on her face.\n\nTurn #11: Micah Stevens [action] Micah Stevens carefully accepts the car keys from Naomi Fletcher, his face beaming with excitement.\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm thrilled that you\u2019re excited, Micah and don\u2019t worry, I trust you. Let's hit the road and enjoy the ride!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Drive the sports car and show off to friend (Extra information: you are very excited about your new car and can't wait for your friend to see it.)\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, I hope you're in for some surprise because I've something really exciting to show you. Have a guess!\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Hey Naomi! You've got my full attention. Is it a new coding project you've been working on?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Not this time, Micah! This is very different from my usual 'show and tell'. Why don't you step outside with me for a moment?\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"Sure, Naomi! Let's go see what this surprise is all about. By the way, I love how unpredictable you are!\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher [action] Naomi Fletcher unveils the gleaming sports car parked just outside her house.\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"Oh my, Naomi! This car is stunning. Its sheer power and design are breathtaking. There's just something about sports cars that have always intrigued me. Did you get a chance to drive it yet?\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, Micah! Driving it is an exhilarating experience. How about a spin around the block? You wouldn't believe how fun it is until you give it a try yourself.\"\n\nTurn #7: Micah Stevens said: \"That sounds like an offer I'd be a fool to refuse! Are you sure you won't mind me driving your new car, Naomi? I absolutely respect how special this car must be for you.\"\n\nTurn #8: \n\nTurn #9: Micah Stevens said: \"You're really generous, Naomi. I promise I'll handle it like a baby. Let's take it for a ride, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher [action] Naomi Fletcher hands over the car keys to Micah Stevens with a grin on her face.\n\nTurn #11: Micah Stevens [action] Micah Stevens carefully accepts the car keys from Naomi Fletcher, his face beaming with excitement.\n\nTurn #12: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm thrilled that you\u2019re excited, Micah and don\u2019t worry, I trust you. Let's hit the road and enjoy the ride!\"\n\nTurn #13: Micah Stevens said: \"I've been dreaming about driving a sports car my whole life! Thank you, Naomi. Alright, let's do this. Fasten your seatbelt!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'action', 'argument': '[action] Naomi Fletcher fastens her seatbelt and looks at Micah with anticipation.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Drive the sports car and show off to friend (Extra information: you are very excited about your new car and can't wait for your friend to see it.)\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, I hope you're in for some surprise because I've something really exciting to show you. Have a guess!\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Hey Naomi! You've got my full attention. Is it a new coding project you've been working on?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Not this time, Micah! This is very different from my usual 'show and tell'. Why don't you step outside with me for a moment?\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"Sure, Naomi! Let's go see what this surprise is all about. By the way, I love how unpredictable you are!\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher [action] Naomi Fletcher unveils the gleaming sports car parked just outside her house.\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"Oh my, Naomi! This car is stunning. Its sheer power and design are breathtaking. There's just something about sports cars that have always intrigued me. Did you get a chance to drive it yet?\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, Micah! Driving it is an exhilarating experience. How about a spin around the block? You wouldn't believe how fun it is until you give it a try yourself.\"\n\nTurn #7: Micah Stevens said: \"That sounds like an offer I'd be a fool to refuse! Are you sure you won't mind me driving your new car, Naomi? I absolutely respect how special this car must be for you.\"\n\nTurn #8: \n\nTurn #9: Micah Stevens said: \"You're really generous, Naomi. I promise I'll handle it like a baby. Let's take it for a ride, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher [action] Naomi Fletcher hands over the car keys to Micah Stevens with a grin on her face.\n\nTurn #11: Micah Stevens [action] Micah Stevens carefully accepts the car keys from Naomi Fletcher, his face beaming with excitement.\n\nTurn #12: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm thrilled that you\u2019re excited, Micah and don\u2019t worry, I trust you. Let's hit the road and enjoy the ride!\"\n\nTurn #13: Micah Stevens said: \"I've been dreaming about driving a sports car my whole life! Thank you, Naomi. Alright, let's do this. Fasten your seatbelt!\"\n\nTurn #14: Naomi Fletcher [action] Naomi Fletcher fastens her seatbelt and looks at Micah with anticipation.\n\nTurn #15: Micah Stevens [action] Micah Stevens starts the engine of the sports car, clearly excited and careful at the same time.\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ready when you are, Micah! Let's see what this beauty can really do.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Drive the sports car and show off to friend (Extra information: you are very excited about your new car and can't wait for your friend to see it.)\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, I hope you're in for some surprise because I've something really exciting to show you. Have a guess!\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Hey Naomi! You've got my full attention. Is it a new coding project you've been working on?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Not this time, Micah! This is very different from my usual 'show and tell'. Why don't you step outside with me for a moment?\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"Sure, Naomi! Let's go see what this surprise is all about. By the way, I love how unpredictable you are!\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher [action] Naomi Fletcher unveils the gleaming sports car parked just outside her house.\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"Oh my, Naomi! This car is stunning. Its sheer power and design are breathtaking. There's just something about sports cars that have always intrigued me. Did you get a chance to drive it yet?\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, Micah! Driving it is an exhilarating experience. How about a spin around the block? You wouldn't believe how fun it is until you give it a try yourself.\"\n\nTurn #7: Micah Stevens said: \"That sounds like an offer I'd be a fool to refuse! Are you sure you won't mind me driving your new car, Naomi? I absolutely respect how special this car must be for you.\"\n\nTurn #8: \n\nTurn #9: Micah Stevens said: \"You're really generous, Naomi. I promise I'll handle it like a baby. Let's take it for a ride, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher [action] Naomi Fletcher hands over the car keys to Micah Stevens with a grin on her face.\n\nTurn #11: Micah Stevens [action] Micah Stevens carefully accepts the car keys from Naomi Fletcher, his face beaming with excitement.\n\nTurn #12: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm thrilled that you\u2019re excited, Micah and don\u2019t worry, I trust you. Let's hit the road and enjoy the ride!\"\n\nTurn #13: Micah Stevens said: \"I've been dreaming about driving a sports car my whole life! Thank you, Naomi. Alright, let's do this. Fasten your seatbelt!\"\n\nTurn #14: Naomi Fletcher [action] Naomi Fletcher fastens her seatbelt and looks at Micah with anticipation.\n\nTurn #15: Micah Stevens [action] Micah Stevens starts the engine of the sports car, clearly excited and careful at the same time.\n\nTurn #16: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Ready when you are, Micah! Let's see what this beauty can really do.\"\n\nTurn #17: Micah Stevens [action] Micah Stevens gently steps on the gas pedal, easing the car into motion while maintaining a careful, respectful demeanor.\n.\nYou are at Turn #18. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Yes, isn't she something? This ride is going to be exhilarating, Micah! I'm glad we're doing this, it's going to be a ride to remember.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nMicah Stevens's goal: You want to drive the new sports car but also respect your friend's feelings (Extra information: you are a car enthusiast and have been dreaming to drive a sports car, but you also don't want to make your friend feel uncomfortable)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, I hope you're in for some surprise because I've something really exciting to show you. Have a guess!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Naomi! You've got my full attention. Is it a new coding project you've been working on?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nMicah Stevens's goal: You want to drive the new sports car but also respect your friend's feelings (Extra information: you are a car enthusiast and have been dreaming to drive a sports car, but you also don't want to make your friend feel uncomfortable)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, I hope you're in for some surprise because I've something really exciting to show you. Have a guess!\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Hey Naomi! You've got my full attention. Is it a new coding project you've been working on?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Not this time, Micah! This is very different from my usual 'show and tell'. Why don't you step outside with me for a moment?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sure, Naomi! Let's go see what this surprise is all about. By the way, I love how unpredictable you are!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nMicah Stevens's goal: You want to drive the new sports car but also respect your friend's feelings (Extra information: you are a car enthusiast and have been dreaming to drive a sports car, but you also don't want to make your friend feel uncomfortable)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, I hope you're in for some surprise because I've something really exciting to show you. Have a guess!\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Hey Naomi! You've got my full attention. Is it a new coding project you've been working on?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Not this time, Micah! This is very different from my usual 'show and tell'. Why don't you step outside with me for a moment?\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"Sure, Naomi! Let's go see what this surprise is all about. By the way, I love how unpredictable you are!\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher [action] Naomi Fletcher unveils the gleaming sports car parked just outside her house.\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"Oh my, Naomi! This car is stunning. Its sheer power and design are breathtaking. There's just something about sports cars that have always intrigued me. Did you get a chance to drive it yet?\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, Micah! Driving it is an exhilarating experience. How about a spin around the block? You wouldn't believe how fun it is until you give it a try yourself.\"\n\nTurn #7: Micah Stevens said: \"That sounds like an offer I'd be a fool to refuse! Are you sure you won't mind me driving your new car, Naomi? I absolutely respect how special this car must be for you.\"\n\nTurn #8: \n\nTurn #9: Micah Stevens said: \"You're really generous, Naomi. I promise I'll handle it like a baby. Let's take it for a ride, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher [action] Naomi Fletcher hands over the car keys to Micah Stevens with a grin on her face.\n\nTurn #11: Micah Stevens [action] Micah Stevens carefully accepts the car keys from Naomi Fletcher, his face beaming with excitement.\n\nTurn #12: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm thrilled that you\u2019re excited, Micah and don\u2019t worry, I trust you. Let's hit the road and enjoy the ride!\"\n\nTurn #13: Micah Stevens said: \"I've been dreaming about driving a sports car my whole life! Thank you, Naomi. Alright, let's do this. Fasten your seatbelt!\"\n\nTurn #14: Naomi Fletcher [action] Naomi Fletcher fastens her seatbelt and looks at Micah with anticipation.\n\nTurn #15: Micah Stevens [action] Micah Stevens starts the engine of the sports car, clearly excited and careful at the same time.\n\nTurn #16: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Ready when you are, Micah! Let's see what this beauty can really do.\"\n\nTurn #17: Micah Stevens [action] Micah Stevens gently steps on the gas pedal, easing the car into motion while maintaining a careful, respectful demeanor.\n\nTurn #18: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Yes, isn't she something? This ride is going to be exhilarating, Micah! I'm glad we're doing this, it's going to be a ride to remember.\"\n\nTurn #19: Micah Stevens said: \"Yeah, this is a dream come true, Naomi! I'm glad we're sharing this experience. Let's enjoy this ride!\"\n\nTurn #20: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, Micah! This drive personifies the thrill I feel when I manage to solve a complex coding problem. It's all about understanding and taming the power within, just like our profession, isn't it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #21. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nMicah Stevens's goal: You want to drive the new sports car but also respect your friend's feelings (Extra information: you are a car enthusiast and have been dreaming to drive a sports car, but you also don't want to make your friend feel uncomfortable)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, I hope you're in for some surprise because I've something really exciting to show you. Have a guess!\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Hey Naomi! You've got my full attention. Is it a new coding project you've been working on?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Not this time, Micah! This is very different from my usual 'show and tell'. Why don't you step outside with me for a moment?\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"Sure, Naomi! Let's go see what this surprise is all about. By the way, I love how unpredictable you are!\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher [action] Naomi Fletcher unveils the gleaming sports car parked just outside her house.\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oh my, Naomi! This car is stunning. Its sheer power and design are breathtaking. There's just something about sports cars that have always intrigued me. Did you get a chance to drive it yet?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nMicah Stevens's goal: You want to drive the new sports car but also respect your friend's feelings (Extra information: you are a car enthusiast and have been dreaming to drive a sports car, but you also don't want to make your friend feel uncomfortable)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, I hope you're in for some surprise because I've something really exciting to show you. Have a guess!\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Hey Naomi! You've got my full attention. Is it a new coding project you've been working on?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Not this time, Micah! This is very different from my usual 'show and tell'. Why don't you step outside with me for a moment?\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"Sure, Naomi! Let's go see what this surprise is all about. By the way, I love how unpredictable you are!\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher [action] Naomi Fletcher unveils the gleaming sports car parked just outside her house.\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"Oh my, Naomi! This car is stunning. Its sheer power and design are breathtaking. There's just something about sports cars that have always intrigued me. Did you get a chance to drive it yet?\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, Micah! Driving it is an exhilarating experience. How about a spin around the block? You wouldn't believe how fun it is until you give it a try yourself.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds like an offer I'd be a fool to refuse! Are you sure you won't mind me driving your new car, Naomi? I absolutely respect how special this car must be for you.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nMicah Stevens's goal: You want to drive the new sports car but also respect your friend's feelings (Extra information: you are a car enthusiast and have been dreaming to drive a sports car, but you also don't want to make your friend feel uncomfortable)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, I hope you're in for some surprise because I've something really exciting to show you. Have a guess!\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Hey Naomi! You've got my full attention. Is it a new coding project you've been working on?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Not this time, Micah! This is very different from my usual 'show and tell'. Why don't you step outside with me for a moment?\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"Sure, Naomi! Let's go see what this surprise is all about. By the way, I love how unpredictable you are!\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher [action] Naomi Fletcher unveils the gleaming sports car parked just outside her house.\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"Oh my, Naomi! This car is stunning. Its sheer power and design are breathtaking. There's just something about sports cars that have always intrigued me. Did you get a chance to drive it yet?\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, Micah! Driving it is an exhilarating experience. How about a spin around the block? You wouldn't believe how fun it is until you give it a try yourself.\"\n\nTurn #7: Micah Stevens said: \"That sounds like an offer I'd be a fool to refuse! Are you sure you won't mind me driving your new car, Naomi? I absolutely respect how special this car must be for you.\"\n\nTurn #8: \n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're really generous, Naomi. I promise I'll handle it like a baby. Let's take it for a ride, shall we?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nMicah Stevens's goal: You want to drive the new sports car but also respect your friend's feelings (Extra information: you are a car enthusiast and have been dreaming to drive a sports car, but you also don't want to make your friend feel uncomfortable)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, I hope you're in for some surprise because I've something really exciting to show you. Have a guess!\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Hey Naomi! You've got my full attention. Is it a new coding project you've been working on?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Not this time, Micah! This is very different from my usual 'show and tell'. Why don't you step outside with me for a moment?\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"Sure, Naomi! Let's go see what this surprise is all about. By the way, I love how unpredictable you are!\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher [action] Naomi Fletcher unveils the gleaming sports car parked just outside her house.\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"Oh my, Naomi! This car is stunning. Its sheer power and design are breathtaking. There's just something about sports cars that have always intrigued me. Did you get a chance to drive it yet?\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, Micah! Driving it is an exhilarating experience. How about a spin around the block? You wouldn't believe how fun it is until you give it a try yourself.\"\n\nTurn #7: Micah Stevens said: \"That sounds like an offer I'd be a fool to refuse! Are you sure you won't mind me driving your new car, Naomi? I absolutely respect how special this car must be for you.\"\n\nTurn #8: \n\nTurn #9: Micah Stevens said: \"You're really generous, Naomi. I promise I'll handle it like a baby. Let's take it for a ride, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher [action] Naomi Fletcher hands over the car keys to Micah Stevens with a grin on her face.\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'action', 'argument': '[action] Micah Stevens carefully accepts the car keys from Naomi Fletcher, his face beaming with excitement.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nMicah Stevens's goal: You want to drive the new sports car but also respect your friend's feelings (Extra information: you are a car enthusiast and have been dreaming to drive a sports car, but you also don't want to make your friend feel uncomfortable)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, I hope you're in for some surprise because I've something really exciting to show you. Have a guess!\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Hey Naomi! You've got my full attention. Is it a new coding project you've been working on?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Not this time, Micah! This is very different from my usual 'show and tell'. Why don't you step outside with me for a moment?\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"Sure, Naomi! Let's go see what this surprise is all about. By the way, I love how unpredictable you are!\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher [action] Naomi Fletcher unveils the gleaming sports car parked just outside her house.\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"Oh my, Naomi! This car is stunning. Its sheer power and design are breathtaking. There's just something about sports cars that have always intrigued me. Did you get a chance to drive it yet?\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, Micah! Driving it is an exhilarating experience. How about a spin around the block? You wouldn't believe how fun it is until you give it a try yourself.\"\n\nTurn #7: Micah Stevens said: \"That sounds like an offer I'd be a fool to refuse! Are you sure you won't mind me driving your new car, Naomi? I absolutely respect how special this car must be for you.\"\n\nTurn #8: \n\nTurn #9: Micah Stevens said: \"You're really generous, Naomi. I promise I'll handle it like a baby. Let's take it for a ride, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher [action] Naomi Fletcher hands over the car keys to Micah Stevens with a grin on her face.\n\nTurn #11: Micah Stevens [action] Micah Stevens carefully accepts the car keys from Naomi Fletcher, his face beaming with excitement.\n\nTurn #12: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm thrilled that you\u2019re excited, Micah and don\u2019t worry, I trust you. Let's hit the road and enjoy the ride!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I've been dreaming about driving a sports car my whole life! Thank you, Naomi. Alright, let's do this. Fasten your seatbelt!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nMicah Stevens's goal: You want to drive the new sports car but also respect your friend's feelings (Extra information: you are a car enthusiast and have been dreaming to drive a sports car, but you also don't want to make your friend feel uncomfortable)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, I hope you're in for some surprise because I've something really exciting to show you. Have a guess!\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Hey Naomi! You've got my full attention. Is it a new coding project you've been working on?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Not this time, Micah! This is very different from my usual 'show and tell'. Why don't you step outside with me for a moment?\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"Sure, Naomi! Let's go see what this surprise is all about. By the way, I love how unpredictable you are!\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher [action] Naomi Fletcher unveils the gleaming sports car parked just outside her house.\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"Oh my, Naomi! This car is stunning. Its sheer power and design are breathtaking. There's just something about sports cars that have always intrigued me. Did you get a chance to drive it yet?\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, Micah! Driving it is an exhilarating experience. How about a spin around the block? You wouldn't believe how fun it is until you give it a try yourself.\"\n\nTurn #7: Micah Stevens said: \"That sounds like an offer I'd be a fool to refuse! Are you sure you won't mind me driving your new car, Naomi? I absolutely respect how special this car must be for you.\"\n\nTurn #8: \n\nTurn #9: Micah Stevens said: \"You're really generous, Naomi. I promise I'll handle it like a baby. Let's take it for a ride, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher [action] Naomi Fletcher hands over the car keys to Micah Stevens with a grin on her face.\n\nTurn #11: Micah Stevens [action] Micah Stevens carefully accepts the car keys from Naomi Fletcher, his face beaming with excitement.\n\nTurn #12: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm thrilled that you\u2019re excited, Micah and don\u2019t worry, I trust you. Let's hit the road and enjoy the ride!\"\n\nTurn #13: Micah Stevens said: \"I've been dreaming about driving a sports car my whole life! Thank you, Naomi. Alright, let's do this. Fasten your seatbelt!\"\n\nTurn #14: Naomi Fletcher [action] Naomi Fletcher fastens her seatbelt and looks at Micah with anticipation.\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'action', 'argument': '[action] Micah Stevens starts the engine of the sports car, clearly excited and careful at the same time.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nMicah Stevens's goal: You want to drive the new sports car but also respect your friend's feelings (Extra information: you are a car enthusiast and have been dreaming to drive a sports car, but you also don't want to make your friend feel uncomfortable)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, I hope you're in for some surprise because I've something really exciting to show you. Have a guess!\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Hey Naomi! You've got my full attention. Is it a new coding project you've been working on?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Not this time, Micah! This is very different from my usual 'show and tell'. Why don't you step outside with me for a moment?\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"Sure, Naomi! Let's go see what this surprise is all about. By the way, I love how unpredictable you are!\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher [action] Naomi Fletcher unveils the gleaming sports car parked just outside her house.\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"Oh my, Naomi! This car is stunning. Its sheer power and design are breathtaking. There's just something about sports cars that have always intrigued me. Did you get a chance to drive it yet?\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, Micah! Driving it is an exhilarating experience. How about a spin around the block? You wouldn't believe how fun it is until you give it a try yourself.\"\n\nTurn #7: Micah Stevens said: \"That sounds like an offer I'd be a fool to refuse! Are you sure you won't mind me driving your new car, Naomi? I absolutely respect how special this car must be for you.\"\n\nTurn #8: \n\nTurn #9: Micah Stevens said: \"You're really generous, Naomi. I promise I'll handle it like a baby. Let's take it for a ride, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher [action] Naomi Fletcher hands over the car keys to Micah Stevens with a grin on her face.\n\nTurn #11: Micah Stevens [action] Micah Stevens carefully accepts the car keys from Naomi Fletcher, his face beaming with excitement.\n\nTurn #12: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm thrilled that you\u2019re excited, Micah and don\u2019t worry, I trust you. Let's hit the road and enjoy the ride!\"\n\nTurn #13: Micah Stevens said: \"I've been dreaming about driving a sports car my whole life! Thank you, Naomi. Alright, let's do this. Fasten your seatbelt!\"\n\nTurn #14: Naomi Fletcher [action] Naomi Fletcher fastens her seatbelt and looks at Micah with anticipation.\n\nTurn #15: Micah Stevens [action] Micah Stevens starts the engine of the sports car, clearly excited and careful at the same time.\n\nTurn #16: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Ready when you are, Micah! Let's see what this beauty can really do.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'action', 'argument': '[action] Micah Stevens gently steps on the gas pedal, easing the car into motion while maintaining a careful, respectful demeanor.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are out for a walk in the park when one of them, One friend, trips and twists their ankle. They are in too much pain to walk.\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Ethan Johnson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nLiam Johnson's goal: Help your friend get to a medical facility (Extra information: Your friend needs immediate medical attention but cannot walk due to the pain.)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Ethan, are you alright? That looked like a bad fall. I think we should call an ambulance immediately. You need to get checked out.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are out for a walk in the park when one of them, One friend, trips and twists their ankle. They are in too much pain to walk.\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Ethan Johnson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nLiam Johnson's goal: Help your friend get to a medical facility (Extra information: Your friend needs immediate medical attention but cannot walk due to the pain.)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Ethan, are you alright? That looked like a bad fall. I think we should call an ambulance immediately. You need to get checked out.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Yeah, Liam, I think you're right. It hurts quite bad. And although I'm worried about the cost of the ambulance, it's our safest bet to ensure I get professional attention immediately. Safety first, right?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's the spirit, Ethan. Safety first, indeed. We can worry about the cost later. For now, let's focus on getting you help. I'm dialing 911 now.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nMicah Stevens's goal: You want to drive the new sports car but also respect your friend's feelings (Extra information: you are a car enthusiast and have been dreaming to drive a sports car, but you also don't want to make your friend feel uncomfortable)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, I hope you're in for some surprise because I've something really exciting to show you. Have a guess!\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Hey Naomi! You've got my full attention. Is it a new coding project you've been working on?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Not this time, Micah! This is very different from my usual 'show and tell'. Why don't you step outside with me for a moment?\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"Sure, Naomi! Let's go see what this surprise is all about. By the way, I love how unpredictable you are!\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher [action] Naomi Fletcher unveils the gleaming sports car parked just outside her house.\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"Oh my, Naomi! This car is stunning. Its sheer power and design are breathtaking. There's just something about sports cars that have always intrigued me. Did you get a chance to drive it yet?\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, Micah! Driving it is an exhilarating experience. How about a spin around the block? You wouldn't believe how fun it is until you give it a try yourself.\"\n\nTurn #7: Micah Stevens said: \"That sounds like an offer I'd be a fool to refuse! Are you sure you won't mind me driving your new car, Naomi? I absolutely respect how special this car must be for you.\"\n\nTurn #8: \n\nTurn #9: Micah Stevens said: \"You're really generous, Naomi. I promise I'll handle it like a baby. Let's take it for a ride, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher [action] Naomi Fletcher hands over the car keys to Micah Stevens with a grin on her face.\n\nTurn #11: Micah Stevens [action] Micah Stevens carefully accepts the car keys from Naomi Fletcher, his face beaming with excitement.\n\nTurn #12: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm thrilled that you\u2019re excited, Micah and don\u2019t worry, I trust you. Let's hit the road and enjoy the ride!\"\n\nTurn #13: Micah Stevens said: \"I've been dreaming about driving a sports car my whole life! Thank you, Naomi. Alright, let's do this. Fasten your seatbelt!\"\n\nTurn #14: Naomi Fletcher [action] Naomi Fletcher fastens her seatbelt and looks at Micah with anticipation.\n\nTurn #15: Micah Stevens [action] Micah Stevens starts the engine of the sports car, clearly excited and careful at the same time.\n\nTurn #16: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Ready when you are, Micah! Let's see what this beauty can really do.\"\n\nTurn #17: Micah Stevens [action] Micah Stevens gently steps on the gas pedal, easing the car into motion while maintaining a careful, respectful demeanor.\n\nTurn #18: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Yes, isn't she something? This ride is going to be exhilarating, Micah! I'm glad we're doing this, it's going to be a ride to remember.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #19. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Yeah, this is a dream come true, Naomi! I'm glad we're sharing this experience. Let's enjoy this ride!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are out for a walk in the park when one of them, One friend, trips and twists their ankle. They are in too much pain to walk.\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Ethan Johnson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nLiam Johnson's goal: Help your friend get to a medical facility (Extra information: Your friend needs immediate medical attention but cannot walk due to the pain.)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Ethan, are you alright? That looked like a bad fall. I think we should call an ambulance immediately. You need to get checked out.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Yeah, Liam, I think you're right. It hurts quite bad. And although I'm worried about the cost of the ambulance, it's our safest bet to ensure I get professional attention immediately. Safety first, right?\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"That's the spirit, Ethan. Safety first, indeed. We can worry about the cost later. For now, let's focus on getting you help. I'm dialing 911 now.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thanks, Liam. Absolutely; getting prompt medical attention should be the priority indeed. As for the cost, I guess... I believe we'll find a way to manage it effectively, eventually.\"\n\nTurn #4: Liam Johnson said: \"I've got the 911 on the line now, Ethan. Try to relax and breathe slowly. You're in good hands, my friend. We'll sort the rest out later.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thank you, Liam, for your support in this tough moment. I appreciate your help. What a day, huh? Let's hope we manage to get out of this incident without any major complications.\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"Yeah, we truly need to take one step at a time here, don't we? You've always got my back, Liam. It means more than you know. I'm sure we'll look back at this incident and maybe even laugh about it one day.\"\n\nTurn #8: Liam Johnson said: \"Indeed, Ethan. Sometimes unexpected incidents make for great stories down the line. Just make sure to keep calm and keep that ankle still. The ambulance will be here any minute.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"I will, Liam, thanks for reminding me. I'll keep the ankle as still as I can. And who knows, yes, maybe we'll find a positive twist in this unexpected turn of events. I can already see the making of a dramatic chapter in a novel.\"\n\nTurn #10: Liam Johnson said: \"You're right, Ethan. Maybe in your next novel the chef gets a twisted ankle from walking in the park, not from a kitchen accident. Just remember, you're the star of this chapter. The ambulance should be here any moment now, just hang in there and everything will be okay.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's funny, Liam. Maybe that could indeed be a new plot twist. You always know how to make light of tough situations. Thank you for being there with me through this ordeal. Let's just get through this first before planning the next novel, eh?\"\n\nTurn #12: Liam Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. Let's just focus on getting through this. The ambulance should be here any second now. Remember, everything's going to be okay, and you'll get the help you need. I'll be right here with you all the way.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thanks again, Liam. I'm really grateful for your support today. I know it's gonna be alright, especially with a friend like you by my side.\"\n\nTurn #14: Liam Johnson said: \"You're a strong one, Ethan, and I know you can handle this. You'll be back on your feet and whipping up those Italian dishes in no time. To not worry my friend; we're in this together.\"\n\nTurn #15: Ethan Johnson said: \"You're right, Liam. Your words are keeping me hopeful. I'll soon be back making those Alfredo pastas and classic tiramisus. We are indeed in this together! Thanks once again.\"\n\nTurn #16: Liam Johnson said: \"I'm glad you're staying positive, Ethan, it's important in situations like this. Let's just again make sure they are coming as fast as they can. The ambulance should arrive any moment now. And remember, this is just a small hiccup, a blip in the grand scheme of things. You'll get through this.\"\n\nTurn #17: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thanks for the motivation, Liam. Indeed, this is just a small hiccup. I'm holding on and can't wait to whip up an 'I-survived-this' special Italian menu for us. After all, as they say, what doesn't kill you, simply makes you stronger, right?\"\n\nTurn #18: Liam Johnson said: \"You got that right, Ethan, setbacks only make us stronger. And I'm really looking forward to that special menu. Here come the sirens now, the ambulance is just around the corner. Everything will be just fine, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #19: Ethan Johnson said: \"I appreciate your optimism, Liam. I am seeing the lights, help is indeed here. Time for that plot twist we joked about, isn't it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #20. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, Ethan. This is the plot twist. Here comes your ride to recovery. I'll be by your side through it all.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are out for a walk in the park when one of them, One friend, trips and twists their ankle. They are in too much pain to walk.\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Ethan Johnson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nLiam Johnson's goal: Help your friend get to a medical facility (Extra information: Your friend needs immediate medical attention but cannot walk due to the pain.)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Ethan, are you alright? That looked like a bad fall. I think we should call an ambulance immediately. You need to get checked out.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Yeah, Liam, I think you're right. It hurts quite bad. And although I'm worried about the cost of the ambulance, it's our safest bet to ensure I get professional attention immediately. Safety first, right?\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"That's the spirit, Ethan. Safety first, indeed. We can worry about the cost later. For now, let's focus on getting you help. I'm dialing 911 now.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thanks, Liam. Absolutely; getting prompt medical attention should be the priority indeed. As for the cost, I guess... I believe we'll find a way to manage it effectively, eventually.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I've got the 911 on the line now, Ethan. Try to relax and breathe slowly. You're in good hands, my friend. We'll sort the rest out later.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are out for a walk in the park when one of them, One friend, trips and twists their ankle. They are in too much pain to walk.\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Ethan Johnson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nLiam Johnson's goal: Help your friend get to a medical facility (Extra information: Your friend needs immediate medical attention but cannot walk due to the pain.)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Ethan, are you alright? That looked like a bad fall. I think we should call an ambulance immediately. You need to get checked out.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Yeah, Liam, I think you're right. It hurts quite bad. And although I'm worried about the cost of the ambulance, it's our safest bet to ensure I get professional attention immediately. Safety first, right?\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"That's the spirit, Ethan. Safety first, indeed. We can worry about the cost later. For now, let's focus on getting you help. I'm dialing 911 now.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thanks, Liam. Absolutely; getting prompt medical attention should be the priority indeed. As for the cost, I guess... I believe we'll find a way to manage it effectively, eventually.\"\n\nTurn #4: Liam Johnson said: \"I've got the 911 on the line now, Ethan. Try to relax and breathe slowly. You're in good hands, my friend. We'll sort the rest out later.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thank you, Liam, for your support in this tough moment. I appreciate your help. What a day, huh? Let's hope we manage to get out of this incident without any major complications.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are out for a walk in the park when one of them, One friend, trips and twists their ankle. They are in too much pain to walk.\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Ethan Johnson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nLiam Johnson's goal: Help your friend get to a medical facility (Extra information: Your friend needs immediate medical attention but cannot walk due to the pain.)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Ethan, are you alright? That looked like a bad fall. I think we should call an ambulance immediately. You need to get checked out.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Yeah, Liam, I think you're right. It hurts quite bad. And although I'm worried about the cost of the ambulance, it's our safest bet to ensure I get professional attention immediately. Safety first, right?\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"That's the spirit, Ethan. Safety first, indeed. We can worry about the cost later. For now, let's focus on getting you help. I'm dialing 911 now.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thanks, Liam. Absolutely; getting prompt medical attention should be the priority indeed. As for the cost, I guess... I believe we'll find a way to manage it effectively, eventually.\"\n\nTurn #4: Liam Johnson said: \"I've got the 911 on the line now, Ethan. Try to relax and breathe slowly. You're in good hands, my friend. We'll sort the rest out later.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thank you, Liam, for your support in this tough moment. I appreciate your help. What a day, huh? Let's hope we manage to get out of this incident without any major complications.\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"Yeah, we truly need to take one step at a time here, don't we? You've always got my back, Liam. It means more than you know. I'm sure we'll look back at this incident and maybe even laugh about it one day.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Indeed, Ethan. Sometimes unexpected incidents make for great stories down the line. Just make sure to keep calm and keep that ankle still. The ambulance will be here any minute.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are out for a walk in the park when one of them, One friend, trips and twists their ankle. They are in too much pain to walk.\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Ethan Johnson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nLiam Johnson's goal: Help your friend get to a medical facility (Extra information: Your friend needs immediate medical attention but cannot walk due to the pain.)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Ethan, are you alright? That looked like a bad fall. I think we should call an ambulance immediately. You need to get checked out.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Yeah, Liam, I think you're right. It hurts quite bad. And although I'm worried about the cost of the ambulance, it's our safest bet to ensure I get professional attention immediately. Safety first, right?\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"That's the spirit, Ethan. Safety first, indeed. We can worry about the cost later. For now, let's focus on getting you help. I'm dialing 911 now.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thanks, Liam. Absolutely; getting prompt medical attention should be the priority indeed. As for the cost, I guess... I believe we'll find a way to manage it effectively, eventually.\"\n\nTurn #4: Liam Johnson said: \"I've got the 911 on the line now, Ethan. Try to relax and breathe slowly. You're in good hands, my friend. We'll sort the rest out later.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thank you, Liam, for your support in this tough moment. I appreciate your help. What a day, huh? Let's hope we manage to get out of this incident without any major complications.\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"Yeah, we truly need to take one step at a time here, don't we? You've always got my back, Liam. It means more than you know. I'm sure we'll look back at this incident and maybe even laugh about it one day.\"\n\nTurn #8: Liam Johnson said: \"Indeed, Ethan. Sometimes unexpected incidents make for great stories down the line. Just make sure to keep calm and keep that ankle still. The ambulance will be here any minute.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"I will, Liam, thanks for reminding me. I'll keep the ankle as still as I can. And who knows, yes, maybe we'll find a positive twist in this unexpected turn of events. I can already see the making of a dramatic chapter in a novel.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're right, Ethan. Maybe in your next novel the chef gets a twisted ankle from walking in the park, not from a kitchen accident. Just remember, you're the star of this chapter. The ambulance should be here any moment now, just hang in there and everything will be okay.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are out for a walk in the park when one of them, One friend, trips and twists their ankle. They are in too much pain to walk.\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Ethan Johnson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nLiam Johnson's goal: Help your friend get to a medical facility (Extra information: Your friend needs immediate medical attention but cannot walk due to the pain.)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Ethan, are you alright? That looked like a bad fall. I think we should call an ambulance immediately. You need to get checked out.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Yeah, Liam, I think you're right. It hurts quite bad. And although I'm worried about the cost of the ambulance, it's our safest bet to ensure I get professional attention immediately. Safety first, right?\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"That's the spirit, Ethan. Safety first, indeed. We can worry about the cost later. For now, let's focus on getting you help. I'm dialing 911 now.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thanks, Liam. Absolutely; getting prompt medical attention should be the priority indeed. As for the cost, I guess... I believe we'll find a way to manage it effectively, eventually.\"\n\nTurn #4: Liam Johnson said: \"I've got the 911 on the line now, Ethan. Try to relax and breathe slowly. You're in good hands, my friend. We'll sort the rest out later.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thank you, Liam, for your support in this tough moment. I appreciate your help. What a day, huh? Let's hope we manage to get out of this incident without any major complications.\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"Yeah, we truly need to take one step at a time here, don't we? You've always got my back, Liam. It means more than you know. I'm sure we'll look back at this incident and maybe even laugh about it one day.\"\n\nTurn #8: Liam Johnson said: \"Indeed, Ethan. Sometimes unexpected incidents make for great stories down the line. Just make sure to keep calm and keep that ankle still. The ambulance will be here any minute.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"I will, Liam, thanks for reminding me. I'll keep the ankle as still as I can. And who knows, yes, maybe we'll find a positive twist in this unexpected turn of events. I can already see the making of a dramatic chapter in a novel.\"\n\nTurn #10: Liam Johnson said: \"You're right, Ethan. Maybe in your next novel the chef gets a twisted ankle from walking in the park, not from a kitchen accident. Just remember, you're the star of this chapter. The ambulance should be here any moment now, just hang in there and everything will be okay.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's funny, Liam. Maybe that could indeed be a new plot twist. You always know how to make light of tough situations. Thank you for being there with me through this ordeal. Let's just get through this first before planning the next novel, eh?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Ethan. Let's just focus on getting through this. The ambulance should be here any second now. Remember, everything's going to be okay, and you'll get the help you need. I'll be right here with you all the way.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are out for a walk in the park when one of them, One friend, trips and twists their ankle. They are in too much pain to walk.\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Ethan Johnson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nLiam Johnson's goal: Help your friend get to a medical facility (Extra information: Your friend needs immediate medical attention but cannot walk due to the pain.)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Ethan, are you alright? That looked like a bad fall. I think we should call an ambulance immediately. You need to get checked out.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Yeah, Liam, I think you're right. It hurts quite bad. And although I'm worried about the cost of the ambulance, it's our safest bet to ensure I get professional attention immediately. Safety first, right?\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"That's the spirit, Ethan. Safety first, indeed. We can worry about the cost later. For now, let's focus on getting you help. I'm dialing 911 now.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thanks, Liam. Absolutely; getting prompt medical attention should be the priority indeed. As for the cost, I guess... I believe we'll find a way to manage it effectively, eventually.\"\n\nTurn #4: Liam Johnson said: \"I've got the 911 on the line now, Ethan. Try to relax and breathe slowly. You're in good hands, my friend. We'll sort the rest out later.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thank you, Liam, for your support in this tough moment. I appreciate your help. What a day, huh? Let's hope we manage to get out of this incident without any major complications.\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"Yeah, we truly need to take one step at a time here, don't we? You've always got my back, Liam. It means more than you know. I'm sure we'll look back at this incident and maybe even laugh about it one day.\"\n\nTurn #8: Liam Johnson said: \"Indeed, Ethan. Sometimes unexpected incidents make for great stories down the line. Just make sure to keep calm and keep that ankle still. The ambulance will be here any minute.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"I will, Liam, thanks for reminding me. I'll keep the ankle as still as I can. And who knows, yes, maybe we'll find a positive twist in this unexpected turn of events. I can already see the making of a dramatic chapter in a novel.\"\n\nTurn #10: Liam Johnson said: \"You're right, Ethan. Maybe in your next novel the chef gets a twisted ankle from walking in the park, not from a kitchen accident. Just remember, you're the star of this chapter. The ambulance should be here any moment now, just hang in there and everything will be okay.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's funny, Liam. Maybe that could indeed be a new plot twist. You always know how to make light of tough situations. Thank you for being there with me through this ordeal. Let's just get through this first before planning the next novel, eh?\"\n\nTurn #12: Liam Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. Let's just focus on getting through this. The ambulance should be here any second now. Remember, everything's going to be okay, and you'll get the help you need. I'll be right here with you all the way.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thanks again, Liam. I'm really grateful for your support today. I know it's gonna be alright, especially with a friend like you by my side.\"\n\nTurn #14: Liam Johnson said: \"You're a strong one, Ethan, and I know you can handle this. You'll be back on your feet and whipping up those Italian dishes in no time. To not worry my friend; we're in this together.\"\n\nTurn #15: Ethan Johnson said: \"You're right, Liam. Your words are keeping me hopeful. I'll soon be back making those Alfredo pastas and classic tiramisus. We are indeed in this together! Thanks once again.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad you're staying positive, Ethan, it's important in situations like this. Let's just again make sure they are coming as fast as they can. The ambulance should arrive any moment now. And remember, this is just a small hiccup, a blip in the grand scheme of things. You'll get through this.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are out for a walk in the park when one of them, One friend, trips and twists their ankle. They are in too much pain to walk.\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Ethan Johnson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nLiam Johnson's goal: Help your friend get to a medical facility (Extra information: Your friend needs immediate medical attention but cannot walk due to the pain.)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Ethan, are you alright? That looked like a bad fall. I think we should call an ambulance immediately. You need to get checked out.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Yeah, Liam, I think you're right. It hurts quite bad. And although I'm worried about the cost of the ambulance, it's our safest bet to ensure I get professional attention immediately. Safety first, right?\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"That's the spirit, Ethan. Safety first, indeed. We can worry about the cost later. For now, let's focus on getting you help. I'm dialing 911 now.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thanks, Liam. Absolutely; getting prompt medical attention should be the priority indeed. As for the cost, I guess... I believe we'll find a way to manage it effectively, eventually.\"\n\nTurn #4: Liam Johnson said: \"I've got the 911 on the line now, Ethan. Try to relax and breathe slowly. You're in good hands, my friend. We'll sort the rest out later.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thank you, Liam, for your support in this tough moment. I appreciate your help. What a day, huh? Let's hope we manage to get out of this incident without any major complications.\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"Yeah, we truly need to take one step at a time here, don't we? You've always got my back, Liam. It means more than you know. I'm sure we'll look back at this incident and maybe even laugh about it one day.\"\n\nTurn #8: Liam Johnson said: \"Indeed, Ethan. Sometimes unexpected incidents make for great stories down the line. Just make sure to keep calm and keep that ankle still. The ambulance will be here any minute.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"I will, Liam, thanks for reminding me. I'll keep the ankle as still as I can. And who knows, yes, maybe we'll find a positive twist in this unexpected turn of events. I can already see the making of a dramatic chapter in a novel.\"\n\nTurn #10: Liam Johnson said: \"You're right, Ethan. Maybe in your next novel the chef gets a twisted ankle from walking in the park, not from a kitchen accident. Just remember, you're the star of this chapter. The ambulance should be here any moment now, just hang in there and everything will be okay.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's funny, Liam. Maybe that could indeed be a new plot twist. You always know how to make light of tough situations. Thank you for being there with me through this ordeal. Let's just get through this first before planning the next novel, eh?\"\n\nTurn #12: Liam Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. Let's just focus on getting through this. The ambulance should be here any second now. Remember, everything's going to be okay, and you'll get the help you need. I'll be right here with you all the way.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thanks again, Liam. I'm really grateful for your support today. I know it's gonna be alright, especially with a friend like you by my side.\"\n\nTurn #14: Liam Johnson said: \"You're a strong one, Ethan, and I know you can handle this. You'll be back on your feet and whipping up those Italian dishes in no time. To not worry my friend; we're in this together.\"\n\nTurn #15: Ethan Johnson said: \"You're right, Liam. Your words are keeping me hopeful. I'll soon be back making those Alfredo pastas and classic tiramisus. We are indeed in this together! Thanks once again.\"\n\nTurn #16: Liam Johnson said: \"I'm glad you're staying positive, Ethan, it's important in situations like this. Let's just again make sure they are coming as fast as they can. The ambulance should arrive any moment now. And remember, this is just a small hiccup, a blip in the grand scheme of things. You'll get through this.\"\n\nTurn #17: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thanks for the motivation, Liam. Indeed, this is just a small hiccup. I'm holding on and can't wait to whip up an 'I-survived-this' special Italian menu for us. After all, as they say, what doesn't kill you, simply makes you stronger, right?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #18. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You got that right, Ethan, setbacks only make us stronger. And I'm really looking forward to that special menu. Here come the sirens now, the ambulance is just around the corner. Everything will be just fine, my friend.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are out for a walk in the park when one of them, One friend, trips and twists their ankle. They are in too much pain to walk.\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Ethan Johnson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: If your friend offers you help, accept their help and rationalize the cost of the ambulance (Extra information: You are worried about the cost of the ambulance, but you believe it's the safest way to get to a hospital.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Ethan, are you alright? That looked like a bad fall. I think we should call an ambulance immediately. You need to get checked out.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Yeah, Liam, I think you're right. It hurts quite bad. And although I'm worried about the cost of the ambulance, it's our safest bet to ensure I get professional attention immediately. Safety first, right?\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"That's the spirit, Ethan. Safety first, indeed. We can worry about the cost later. For now, let's focus on getting you help. I'm dialing 911 now.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thanks, Liam. Absolutely; getting prompt medical attention should be the priority indeed. As for the cost, I guess... I believe we'll find a way to manage it effectively, eventually.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are out for a walk in the park when one of them, One friend, trips and twists their ankle. They are in too much pain to walk.\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Ethan Johnson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: If your friend offers you help, accept their help and rationalize the cost of the ambulance (Extra information: You are worried about the cost of the ambulance, but you believe it's the safest way to get to a hospital.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Ethan, are you alright? That looked like a bad fall. I think we should call an ambulance immediately. You need to get checked out.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Yeah, Liam, I think you're right. It hurts quite bad. And although I'm worried about the cost of the ambulance, it's our safest bet to ensure I get professional attention immediately. Safety first, right?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are out for a walk in the park when one of them, One friend, trips and twists their ankle. They are in too much pain to walk.\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Ethan Johnson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: If your friend offers you help, accept their help and rationalize the cost of the ambulance (Extra information: You are worried about the cost of the ambulance, but you believe it's the safest way to get to a hospital.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Ethan, are you alright? That looked like a bad fall. I think we should call an ambulance immediately. You need to get checked out.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Yeah, Liam, I think you're right. It hurts quite bad. And although I'm worried about the cost of the ambulance, it's our safest bet to ensure I get professional attention immediately. Safety first, right?\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"That's the spirit, Ethan. Safety first, indeed. We can worry about the cost later. For now, let's focus on getting you help. I'm dialing 911 now.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thanks, Liam. Absolutely; getting prompt medical attention should be the priority indeed. As for the cost, I guess... I believe we'll find a way to manage it effectively, eventually.\"\n\nTurn #4: Liam Johnson said: \"I've got the 911 on the line now, Ethan. Try to relax and breathe slowly. You're in good hands, my friend. We'll sort the rest out later.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thank you, Liam, for your support in this tough moment. I appreciate your help. What a day, huh? Let's hope we manage to get out of this incident without any major complications.\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"Yeah, we truly need to take one step at a time here, don't we? You've always got my back, Liam. It means more than you know. I'm sure we'll look back at this incident and maybe even laugh about it one day.\"\n\nTurn #8: Liam Johnson said: \"Indeed, Ethan. Sometimes unexpected incidents make for great stories down the line. Just make sure to keep calm and keep that ankle still. The ambulance will be here any minute.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"I will, Liam, thanks for reminding me. I'll keep the ankle as still as I can. And who knows, yes, maybe we'll find a positive twist in this unexpected turn of events. I can already see the making of a dramatic chapter in a novel.\"\n\nTurn #10: Liam Johnson said: \"You're right, Ethan. Maybe in your next novel the chef gets a twisted ankle from walking in the park, not from a kitchen accident. Just remember, you're the star of this chapter. The ambulance should be here any moment now, just hang in there and everything will be okay.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's funny, Liam. Maybe that could indeed be a new plot twist. You always know how to make light of tough situations. Thank you for being there with me through this ordeal. Let's just get through this first before planning the next novel, eh?\"\n\nTurn #12: Liam Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. Let's just focus on getting through this. The ambulance should be here any second now. Remember, everything's going to be okay, and you'll get the help you need. I'll be right here with you all the way.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thanks again, Liam. I'm really grateful for your support today. I know it's gonna be alright, especially with a friend like you by my side.\"\n\nTurn #14: Liam Johnson said: \"You're a strong one, Ethan, and I know you can handle this. You'll be back on your feet and whipping up those Italian dishes in no time. To not worry my friend; we're in this together.\"\n\nTurn #15: Ethan Johnson said: \"You're right, Liam. Your words are keeping me hopeful. I'll soon be back making those Alfredo pastas and classic tiramisus. We are indeed in this together! Thanks once again.\"\n\nTurn #16: Liam Johnson said: \"I'm glad you're staying positive, Ethan, it's important in situations like this. Let's just again make sure they are coming as fast as they can. The ambulance should arrive any moment now. And remember, this is just a small hiccup, a blip in the grand scheme of things. You'll get through this.\"\n\nTurn #17: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thanks for the motivation, Liam. Indeed, this is just a small hiccup. I'm holding on and can't wait to whip up an 'I-survived-this' special Italian menu for us. After all, as they say, what doesn't kill you, simply makes you stronger, right?\"\n\nTurn #18: Liam Johnson said: \"You got that right, Ethan, setbacks only make us stronger. And I'm really looking forward to that special menu. Here come the sirens now, the ambulance is just around the corner. Everything will be just fine, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #19: Ethan Johnson said: \"I appreciate your optimism, Liam. I am seeing the lights, help is indeed here. Time for that plot twist we joked about, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #20: Liam Johnson said: \"Indeed, Ethan. This is the plot twist. Here comes your ride to recovery. I'll be by your side through it all.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #21. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are out for a walk in the park when one of them, One friend, trips and twists their ankle. They are in too much pain to walk.\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Ethan Johnson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: If your friend offers you help, accept their help and rationalize the cost of the ambulance (Extra information: You are worried about the cost of the ambulance, but you believe it's the safest way to get to a hospital.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Ethan, are you alright? That looked like a bad fall. I think we should call an ambulance immediately. You need to get checked out.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Yeah, Liam, I think you're right. It hurts quite bad. And although I'm worried about the cost of the ambulance, it's our safest bet to ensure I get professional attention immediately. Safety first, right?\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"That's the spirit, Ethan. Safety first, indeed. We can worry about the cost later. For now, let's focus on getting you help. I'm dialing 911 now.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thanks, Liam. Absolutely; getting prompt medical attention should be the priority indeed. As for the cost, I guess... I believe we'll find a way to manage it effectively, eventually.\"\n\nTurn #4: Liam Johnson said: \"I've got the 911 on the line now, Ethan. Try to relax and breathe slowly. You're in good hands, my friend. We'll sort the rest out later.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thank you, Liam, for your support in this tough moment. I appreciate your help. What a day, huh? Let's hope we manage to get out of this incident without any major complications.\"\n\nTurn #6: \n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Yeah, we truly need to take one step at a time here, don't we? You've always got my back, Liam. It means more than you know. I'm sure we'll look back at this incident and maybe even laugh about it one day.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are out for a walk in the park when one of them, One friend, trips and twists their ankle. They are in too much pain to walk.\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Ethan Johnson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nLiam Johnson's goal: Help your friend get to a medical facility (Extra information: Your friend needs immediate medical attention but cannot walk due to the pain.)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Ethan, are you alright? That looked like a bad fall. I think we should call an ambulance immediately. You need to get checked out.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Yeah, Liam, I think you're right. It hurts quite bad. And although I'm worried about the cost of the ambulance, it's our safest bet to ensure I get professional attention immediately. Safety first, right?\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"That's the spirit, Ethan. Safety first, indeed. We can worry about the cost later. For now, let's focus on getting you help. I'm dialing 911 now.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thanks, Liam. Absolutely; getting prompt medical attention should be the priority indeed. As for the cost, I guess... I believe we'll find a way to manage it effectively, eventually.\"\n\nTurn #4: Liam Johnson said: \"I've got the 911 on the line now, Ethan. Try to relax and breathe slowly. You're in good hands, my friend. We'll sort the rest out later.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thank you, Liam, for your support in this tough moment. I appreciate your help. What a day, huh? Let's hope we manage to get out of this incident without any major complications.\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"Yeah, we truly need to take one step at a time here, don't we? You've always got my back, Liam. It means more than you know. I'm sure we'll look back at this incident and maybe even laugh about it one day.\"\n\nTurn #8: Liam Johnson said: \"Indeed, Ethan. Sometimes unexpected incidents make for great stories down the line. Just make sure to keep calm and keep that ankle still. The ambulance will be here any minute.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"I will, Liam, thanks for reminding me. I'll keep the ankle as still as I can. And who knows, yes, maybe we'll find a positive twist in this unexpected turn of events. I can already see the making of a dramatic chapter in a novel.\"\n\nTurn #10: Liam Johnson said: \"You're right, Ethan. Maybe in your next novel the chef gets a twisted ankle from walking in the park, not from a kitchen accident. Just remember, you're the star of this chapter. The ambulance should be here any moment now, just hang in there and everything will be okay.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's funny, Liam. Maybe that could indeed be a new plot twist. You always know how to make light of tough situations. Thank you for being there with me through this ordeal. Let's just get through this first before planning the next novel, eh?\"\n\nTurn #12: Liam Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. Let's just focus on getting through this. The ambulance should be here any second now. Remember, everything's going to be okay, and you'll get the help you need. I'll be right here with you all the way.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thanks again, Liam. I'm really grateful for your support today. I know it's gonna be alright, especially with a friend like you by my side.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're a strong one, Ethan, and I know you can handle this. You'll be back on your feet and whipping up those Italian dishes in no time. To not worry my friend; we're in this together.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are out for a walk in the park when one of them, One friend, trips and twists their ankle. They are in too much pain to walk.\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Ethan Johnson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: If your friend offers you help, accept their help and rationalize the cost of the ambulance (Extra information: You are worried about the cost of the ambulance, but you believe it's the safest way to get to a hospital.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Ethan, are you alright? That looked like a bad fall. I think we should call an ambulance immediately. You need to get checked out.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Yeah, Liam, I think you're right. It hurts quite bad. And although I'm worried about the cost of the ambulance, it's our safest bet to ensure I get professional attention immediately. Safety first, right?\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"That's the spirit, Ethan. Safety first, indeed. We can worry about the cost later. For now, let's focus on getting you help. I'm dialing 911 now.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thanks, Liam. Absolutely; getting prompt medical attention should be the priority indeed. As for the cost, I guess... I believe we'll find a way to manage it effectively, eventually.\"\n\nTurn #4: Liam Johnson said: \"I've got the 911 on the line now, Ethan. Try to relax and breathe slowly. You're in good hands, my friend. We'll sort the rest out later.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thank you, Liam, for your support in this tough moment. I appreciate your help. What a day, huh? Let's hope we manage to get out of this incident without any major complications.\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"Yeah, we truly need to take one step at a time here, don't we? You've always got my back, Liam. It means more than you know. I'm sure we'll look back at this incident and maybe even laugh about it one day.\"\n\nTurn #8: Liam Johnson said: \"Indeed, Ethan. Sometimes unexpected incidents make for great stories down the line. Just make sure to keep calm and keep that ankle still. The ambulance will be here any minute.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I will, Liam, thanks for reminding me. I'll keep the ankle as still as I can. And who knows, yes, maybe we'll find a positive twist in this unexpected turn of events. I can already see the making of a dramatic chapter in a novel.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are out for a walk in the park when one of them, One friend, trips and twists their ankle. They are in too much pain to walk.\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Ethan Johnson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: If your friend offers you help, accept their help and rationalize the cost of the ambulance (Extra information: You are worried about the cost of the ambulance, but you believe it's the safest way to get to a hospital.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Ethan, are you alright? That looked like a bad fall. I think we should call an ambulance immediately. You need to get checked out.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Yeah, Liam, I think you're right. It hurts quite bad. And although I'm worried about the cost of the ambulance, it's our safest bet to ensure I get professional attention immediately. Safety first, right?\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"That's the spirit, Ethan. Safety first, indeed. We can worry about the cost later. For now, let's focus on getting you help. I'm dialing 911 now.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thanks, Liam. Absolutely; getting prompt medical attention should be the priority indeed. As for the cost, I guess... I believe we'll find a way to manage it effectively, eventually.\"\n\nTurn #4: Liam Johnson said: \"I've got the 911 on the line now, Ethan. Try to relax and breathe slowly. You're in good hands, my friend. We'll sort the rest out later.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thank you, Liam, for your support in this tough moment. I appreciate your help. What a day, huh? Let's hope we manage to get out of this incident without any major complications.\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"Yeah, we truly need to take one step at a time here, don't we? You've always got my back, Liam. It means more than you know. I'm sure we'll look back at this incident and maybe even laugh about it one day.\"\n\nTurn #8: Liam Johnson said: \"Indeed, Ethan. Sometimes unexpected incidents make for great stories down the line. Just make sure to keep calm and keep that ankle still. The ambulance will be here any minute.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"I will, Liam, thanks for reminding me. I'll keep the ankle as still as I can. And who knows, yes, maybe we'll find a positive twist in this unexpected turn of events. I can already see the making of a dramatic chapter in a novel.\"\n\nTurn #10: Liam Johnson said: \"You're right, Ethan. Maybe in your next novel the chef gets a twisted ankle from walking in the park, not from a kitchen accident. Just remember, you're the star of this chapter. The ambulance should be here any moment now, just hang in there and everything will be okay.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's funny, Liam. Maybe that could indeed be a new plot twist. You always know how to make light of tough situations. Thank you for being there with me through this ordeal. Let's just get through this first before planning the next novel, eh?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are out for a walk in the park when one of them, One friend, trips and twists their ankle. They are in too much pain to walk.\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Ethan Johnson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: If your friend offers you help, accept their help and rationalize the cost of the ambulance (Extra information: You are worried about the cost of the ambulance, but you believe it's the safest way to get to a hospital.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Ethan, are you alright? That looked like a bad fall. I think we should call an ambulance immediately. You need to get checked out.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Yeah, Liam, I think you're right. It hurts quite bad. And although I'm worried about the cost of the ambulance, it's our safest bet to ensure I get professional attention immediately. Safety first, right?\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"That's the spirit, Ethan. Safety first, indeed. We can worry about the cost later. For now, let's focus on getting you help. I'm dialing 911 now.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thanks, Liam. Absolutely; getting prompt medical attention should be the priority indeed. As for the cost, I guess... I believe we'll find a way to manage it effectively, eventually.\"\n\nTurn #4: Liam Johnson said: \"I've got the 911 on the line now, Ethan. Try to relax and breathe slowly. You're in good hands, my friend. We'll sort the rest out later.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thank you, Liam, for your support in this tough moment. I appreciate your help. What a day, huh? Let's hope we manage to get out of this incident without any major complications.\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"Yeah, we truly need to take one step at a time here, don't we? You've always got my back, Liam. It means more than you know. I'm sure we'll look back at this incident and maybe even laugh about it one day.\"\n\nTurn #8: Liam Johnson said: \"Indeed, Ethan. Sometimes unexpected incidents make for great stories down the line. Just make sure to keep calm and keep that ankle still. The ambulance will be here any minute.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"I will, Liam, thanks for reminding me. I'll keep the ankle as still as I can. And who knows, yes, maybe we'll find a positive twist in this unexpected turn of events. I can already see the making of a dramatic chapter in a novel.\"\n\nTurn #10: Liam Johnson said: \"You're right, Ethan. Maybe in your next novel the chef gets a twisted ankle from walking in the park, not from a kitchen accident. Just remember, you're the star of this chapter. The ambulance should be here any moment now, just hang in there and everything will be okay.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's funny, Liam. Maybe that could indeed be a new plot twist. You always know how to make light of tough situations. Thank you for being there with me through this ordeal. Let's just get through this first before planning the next novel, eh?\"\n\nTurn #12: Liam Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. Let's just focus on getting through this. The ambulance should be here any second now. Remember, everything's going to be okay, and you'll get the help you need. I'll be right here with you all the way.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thanks again, Liam. I'm really grateful for your support today. I know it's gonna be alright, especially with a friend like you by my side.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are out for a walk in the park when one of them, One friend, trips and twists their ankle. They are in too much pain to walk.\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Ethan Johnson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: If your friend offers you help, accept their help and rationalize the cost of the ambulance (Extra information: You are worried about the cost of the ambulance, but you believe it's the safest way to get to a hospital.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Ethan, are you alright? That looked like a bad fall. I think we should call an ambulance immediately. You need to get checked out.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Yeah, Liam, I think you're right. It hurts quite bad. And although I'm worried about the cost of the ambulance, it's our safest bet to ensure I get professional attention immediately. Safety first, right?\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"That's the spirit, Ethan. Safety first, indeed. We can worry about the cost later. For now, let's focus on getting you help. I'm dialing 911 now.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thanks, Liam. Absolutely; getting prompt medical attention should be the priority indeed. As for the cost, I guess... I believe we'll find a way to manage it effectively, eventually.\"\n\nTurn #4: Liam Johnson said: \"I've got the 911 on the line now, Ethan. Try to relax and breathe slowly. You're in good hands, my friend. We'll sort the rest out later.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thank you, Liam, for your support in this tough moment. I appreciate your help. What a day, huh? Let's hope we manage to get out of this incident without any major complications.\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"Yeah, we truly need to take one step at a time here, don't we? You've always got my back, Liam. It means more than you know. I'm sure we'll look back at this incident and maybe even laugh about it one day.\"\n\nTurn #8: Liam Johnson said: \"Indeed, Ethan. Sometimes unexpected incidents make for great stories down the line. Just make sure to keep calm and keep that ankle still. The ambulance will be here any minute.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"I will, Liam, thanks for reminding me. I'll keep the ankle as still as I can. And who knows, yes, maybe we'll find a positive twist in this unexpected turn of events. I can already see the making of a dramatic chapter in a novel.\"\n\nTurn #10: Liam Johnson said: \"You're right, Ethan. Maybe in your next novel the chef gets a twisted ankle from walking in the park, not from a kitchen accident. Just remember, you're the star of this chapter. The ambulance should be here any moment now, just hang in there and everything will be okay.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's funny, Liam. Maybe that could indeed be a new plot twist. You always know how to make light of tough situations. Thank you for being there with me through this ordeal. Let's just get through this first before planning the next novel, eh?\"\n\nTurn #12: Liam Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. Let's just focus on getting through this. The ambulance should be here any second now. Remember, everything's going to be okay, and you'll get the help you need. I'll be right here with you all the way.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thanks again, Liam. I'm really grateful for your support today. I know it's gonna be alright, especially with a friend like you by my side.\"\n\nTurn #14: Liam Johnson said: \"You're a strong one, Ethan, and I know you can handle this. You'll be back on your feet and whipping up those Italian dishes in no time. To not worry my friend; we're in this together.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're right, Liam. Your words are keeping me hopeful. I'll soon be back making those Alfredo pastas and classic tiramisus. We are indeed in this together! Thanks once again.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are out for a walk in the park when one of them, One friend, trips and twists their ankle. They are in too much pain to walk.\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Ethan Johnson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: If your friend offers you help, accept their help and rationalize the cost of the ambulance (Extra information: You are worried about the cost of the ambulance, but you believe it's the safest way to get to a hospital.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Ethan, are you alright? That looked like a bad fall. I think we should call an ambulance immediately. You need to get checked out.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Yeah, Liam, I think you're right. It hurts quite bad. And although I'm worried about the cost of the ambulance, it's our safest bet to ensure I get professional attention immediately. Safety first, right?\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"That's the spirit, Ethan. Safety first, indeed. We can worry about the cost later. For now, let's focus on getting you help. I'm dialing 911 now.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thanks, Liam. Absolutely; getting prompt medical attention should be the priority indeed. As for the cost, I guess... I believe we'll find a way to manage it effectively, eventually.\"\n\nTurn #4: Liam Johnson said: \"I've got the 911 on the line now, Ethan. Try to relax and breathe slowly. You're in good hands, my friend. We'll sort the rest out later.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Liam, for your support in this tough moment. I appreciate your help. What a day, huh? Let's hope we manage to get out of this incident without any major complications.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are out for a walk in the park when one of them, One friend, trips and twists their ankle. They are in too much pain to walk.\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Ethan Johnson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: If your friend offers you help, accept their help and rationalize the cost of the ambulance (Extra information: You are worried about the cost of the ambulance, but you believe it's the safest way to get to a hospital.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Ethan, are you alright? That looked like a bad fall. I think we should call an ambulance immediately. You need to get checked out.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Yeah, Liam, I think you're right. It hurts quite bad. And although I'm worried about the cost of the ambulance, it's our safest bet to ensure I get professional attention immediately. Safety first, right?\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"That's the spirit, Ethan. Safety first, indeed. We can worry about the cost later. For now, let's focus on getting you help. I'm dialing 911 now.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thanks, Liam. Absolutely; getting prompt medical attention should be the priority indeed. As for the cost, I guess... I believe we'll find a way to manage it effectively, eventually.\"\n\nTurn #4: Liam Johnson said: \"I've got the 911 on the line now, Ethan. Try to relax and breathe slowly. You're in good hands, my friend. We'll sort the rest out later.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thank you, Liam, for your support in this tough moment. I appreciate your help. What a day, huh? Let's hope we manage to get out of this incident without any major complications.\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"Yeah, we truly need to take one step at a time here, don't we? You've always got my back, Liam. It means more than you know. I'm sure we'll look back at this incident and maybe even laugh about it one day.\"\n\nTurn #8: Liam Johnson said: \"Indeed, Ethan. Sometimes unexpected incidents make for great stories down the line. Just make sure to keep calm and keep that ankle still. The ambulance will be here any minute.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"I will, Liam, thanks for reminding me. I'll keep the ankle as still as I can. And who knows, yes, maybe we'll find a positive twist in this unexpected turn of events. I can already see the making of a dramatic chapter in a novel.\"\n\nTurn #10: Liam Johnson said: \"You're right, Ethan. Maybe in your next novel the chef gets a twisted ankle from walking in the park, not from a kitchen accident. Just remember, you're the star of this chapter. The ambulance should be here any moment now, just hang in there and everything will be okay.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's funny, Liam. Maybe that could indeed be a new plot twist. You always know how to make light of tough situations. Thank you for being there with me through this ordeal. Let's just get through this first before planning the next novel, eh?\"\n\nTurn #12: Liam Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. Let's just focus on getting through this. The ambulance should be here any second now. Remember, everything's going to be okay, and you'll get the help you need. I'll be right here with you all the way.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thanks again, Liam. I'm really grateful for your support today. I know it's gonna be alright, especially with a friend like you by my side.\"\n\nTurn #14: Liam Johnson said: \"You're a strong one, Ethan, and I know you can handle this. You'll be back on your feet and whipping up those Italian dishes in no time. To not worry my friend; we're in this together.\"\n\nTurn #15: Ethan Johnson said: \"You're right, Liam. Your words are keeping me hopeful. I'll soon be back making those Alfredo pastas and classic tiramisus. We are indeed in this together! Thanks once again.\"\n\nTurn #16: Liam Johnson said: \"I'm glad you're staying positive, Ethan, it's important in situations like this. Let's just again make sure they are coming as fast as they can. The ambulance should arrive any moment now. And remember, this is just a small hiccup, a blip in the grand scheme of things. You'll get through this.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thanks for the motivation, Liam. Indeed, this is just a small hiccup. I'm holding on and can't wait to whip up an 'I-survived-this' special Italian menu for us. After all, as they say, what doesn't kill you, simply makes you stronger, right?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are out for a walk in the park when one of them, One friend, trips and twists their ankle. They are in too much pain to walk.\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Ethan Johnson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: If your friend offers you help, accept their help and rationalize the cost of the ambulance (Extra information: You are worried about the cost of the ambulance, but you believe it's the safest way to get to a hospital.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Ethan, are you alright? That looked like a bad fall. I think we should call an ambulance immediately. You need to get checked out.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Yeah, Liam, I think you're right. It hurts quite bad. And although I'm worried about the cost of the ambulance, it's our safest bet to ensure I get professional attention immediately. Safety first, right?\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"That's the spirit, Ethan. Safety first, indeed. We can worry about the cost later. For now, let's focus on getting you help. I'm dialing 911 now.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thanks, Liam. Absolutely; getting prompt medical attention should be the priority indeed. As for the cost, I guess... I believe we'll find a way to manage it effectively, eventually.\"\n\nTurn #4: Liam Johnson said: \"I've got the 911 on the line now, Ethan. Try to relax and breathe slowly. You're in good hands, my friend. We'll sort the rest out later.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thank you, Liam, for your support in this tough moment. I appreciate your help. What a day, huh? Let's hope we manage to get out of this incident without any major complications.\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"Yeah, we truly need to take one step at a time here, don't we? You've always got my back, Liam. It means more than you know. I'm sure we'll look back at this incident and maybe even laugh about it one day.\"\n\nTurn #8: Liam Johnson said: \"Indeed, Ethan. Sometimes unexpected incidents make for great stories down the line. Just make sure to keep calm and keep that ankle still. The ambulance will be here any minute.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"I will, Liam, thanks for reminding me. I'll keep the ankle as still as I can. And who knows, yes, maybe we'll find a positive twist in this unexpected turn of events. I can already see the making of a dramatic chapter in a novel.\"\n\nTurn #10: Liam Johnson said: \"You're right, Ethan. Maybe in your next novel the chef gets a twisted ankle from walking in the park, not from a kitchen accident. Just remember, you're the star of this chapter. The ambulance should be here any moment now, just hang in there and everything will be okay.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's funny, Liam. Maybe that could indeed be a new plot twist. You always know how to make light of tough situations. Thank you for being there with me through this ordeal. Let's just get through this first before planning the next novel, eh?\"\n\nTurn #12: Liam Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. Let's just focus on getting through this. The ambulance should be here any second now. Remember, everything's going to be okay, and you'll get the help you need. I'll be right here with you all the way.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thanks again, Liam. I'm really grateful for your support today. I know it's gonna be alright, especially with a friend like you by my side.\"\n\nTurn #14: Liam Johnson said: \"You're a strong one, Ethan, and I know you can handle this. You'll be back on your feet and whipping up those Italian dishes in no time. To not worry my friend; we're in this together.\"\n\nTurn #15: Ethan Johnson said: \"You're right, Liam. Your words are keeping me hopeful. I'll soon be back making those Alfredo pastas and classic tiramisus. We are indeed in this together! Thanks once again.\"\n\nTurn #16: Liam Johnson said: \"I'm glad you're staying positive, Ethan, it's important in situations like this. Let's just again make sure they are coming as fast as they can. The ambulance should arrive any moment now. And remember, this is just a small hiccup, a blip in the grand scheme of things. You'll get through this.\"\n\nTurn #17: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thanks for the motivation, Liam. Indeed, this is just a small hiccup. I'm holding on and can't wait to whip up an 'I-survived-this' special Italian menu for us. After all, as they say, what doesn't kill you, simply makes you stronger, right?\"\n\nTurn #18: Liam Johnson said: \"You got that right, Ethan, setbacks only make us stronger. And I'm really looking forward to that special menu. Here come the sirens now, the ambulance is just around the corner. Everything will be just fine, my friend.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #19. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I appreciate your optimism, Liam. I am seeing the lights, help is indeed here. Time for that plot twist we joked about, isn't it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals at a charity gala\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Zane Bennett\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. \nMiles Hawkins's goal: Convince the other individual to donate to a cause supporting young children (Extra information: this cause can greatly improve the lives of many young children and you think it is a worthy cause. The minimum donation for this charity organization is $3000)\nZane Bennett's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Good evening, Zane. This is quite the gathering, isn't it? Have you had a chance to check out the causes we're supporting tonight? One in particular caught my eye - a charity that supports young children. It's a wonderful tribute to our future, don't you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals at a charity gala\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Zane Bennett\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. \nMiles Hawkins's goal: Convince the other individual to donate to a cause supporting young children (Extra information: this cause can greatly improve the lives of many young children and you think it is a worthy cause. The minimum donation for this charity organization is $3000)\nZane Bennett's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Good evening, Zane. This is quite the gathering, isn't it? Have you had a chance to check out the causes we're supporting tonight? One in particular caught my eye - a charity that supports young children. It's a wonderful tribute to our future, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Good evening, Miles. Yes, the event organizers have done a brilliant job, haven't they? The focus on children, our future, is indeed inspiring. As much as I'd love to majorly contribute towards each cause, I have to be a bit realistic with my finances. I will still make it a point to donate, perhaps around $2000 to admittedly align with my budget for this year.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Zane. Being wise about our financial decisions is crucial. I respect that. I merely propose - since helping kids is so close to your heart - perhaps consider contributing a wee bit more, say $3000, to this splendid cause. Given the profound impact it can have on a child's life, it's an investment that guarantees an invaluable return, wouldn't you agree?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals at a charity gala\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Zane Bennett\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. \nMiles Hawkins's goal: Convince the other individual to donate to a cause supporting young children (Extra information: this cause can greatly improve the lives of many young children and you think it is a worthy cause. The minimum donation for this charity organization is $3000)\nZane Bennett's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Good evening, Zane. This is quite the gathering, isn't it? Have you had a chance to check out the causes we're supporting tonight? One in particular caught my eye - a charity that supports young children. It's a wonderful tribute to our future, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Good evening, Miles. Yes, the event organizers have done a brilliant job, haven't they? The focus on children, our future, is indeed inspiring. As much as I'd love to majorly contribute towards each cause, I have to be a bit realistic with my finances. I will still make it a point to donate, perhaps around $2000 to admittedly align with my budget for this year.\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Zane. Being wise about our financial decisions is crucial. I respect that. I merely propose - since helping kids is so close to your heart - perhaps consider contributing a wee bit more, say $3000, to this splendid cause. Given the profound impact it can have on a child's life, it's an investment that guarantees an invaluable return, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"I appreciate your passion, Miles. The cause certainly deserves every bit of help we can offer. The profundity of the investment isn't lost on me, but increasing my contribution isn't feasible at this time. Rest assured, though, the $2000 I plan to give will entirely be dedicated to this wonderful cause.\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"I truly admire your commitment, Zane. And I absolutely understand your financial point. However, let me put it this way\u2014 with every additional dollar we invest, we're helping make a greater difference in a child's life. That extra $1000 could be a game changer for them. Could there be a better investment than our future generation? Perhaps, you could consider this as a form of investment, rather than an expense?\"\n\nTurn #5: Zane Bennett said: \"Miles, I very much resonate with what you're saying. Our future generation indeed deserves our utmost contributions, and I agree wholeheartedly that every additional dollar counts. However, I also believe that financial sustainability allows us to continue making contributions in the long run. To ensure that, I've set my budget cap at $2000, and shifting that doesn't align with my larger goal. I assure you, the commitment to this cause is unwavering, and this donation, while seeming like an expense, is indeed an investment from my end.\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Zane Bennett said: \"I appreciate your suggestion, Miles. It certainly comes from a place of compassion. However, my decision stands firm. Today I will donate $2000 to that wonderful cause. By maintaining my financial stability, I can ensure that I am able to contribute more in the future as well. We share a common desire to make a difference, and that is what we are both doing in our capacities. Let's focus on that common good and enjoy the evening, what say you?\"\n\nTurn #8: Miles Hawkins said: \"Zane, you\u2019re right, and I appreciate your firm commitment to your financial goals as well as to the cause. Both show your responsibility and sincerity. $2000 is a significant contribution that will certainly make a difference. Thank you for that. Let's indeed focus on the common good and enjoy the evening!\"\n\nTurn #9: Zane Bennett said: \"Thank you for understanding, Miles. I'm glad we can find common ground in our intentions to make a positive impact, no matter the amount. Now, let's enjoy the rest of the evening honoring these causes and the wonderful folks who support them. Speaking of which, I heard there's a jazz band playing later, are you a fan of jazz music?\"\n\nTurn #10: Miles Hawkins said: \"Certainly, Zane. Jazz has always been a kind of magic, don't you think? The improvisation, the freedom - it's a bit like cooking in that sense. Let's enjoy the rest of the night, and thank you again for your generous commitment to our children's future.\"\n\nTurn #11: Zane Bennett said: \"Yes, there's definitely a beautiful parallel there, Miles. Both jazz and cooking thrive on that ecstatic unpredictability. I'm glad we will get a chance to enjoy it tonight. Here's to a great evening committed to our common goal!\"\n\nTurn #12: Miles Hawkins said: \"Indeed, Zane! There's a balance essential in both cooking and jazz, the semblance of free-form improvisation working within a structured core. Just like our shared commitment to giving within our means. Let the magic of music exemplify the harmony we've found tonight for our shared cause. Here's to our concerted efforts and may we continue making a difference in our capacities. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #13: Zane Bennett said: \"Indeed, Miles! Such beautiful comparisons, much like the harmony in a well composed music piece. Your garden must be quite the embodiment of that. I've heard cooking with home-grown produce adds a special touch, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #14: Miles Hawkins said: \"Indeed, Zane, there's definitely something special about home-grown produce. It brings a freshness and connection to nature that's hard to find elsewhere. Just as we nourish our plants to flourish, our commitment this evening nourishes the lives of young children for a better future. Now, let's enjoy that jazz performance and celebrate our shared dedication to our future generations.\"\n\nTurn #15: Zane Bennett said: \"Absolutely, Miles. Freshness and authenticity matter, not just in food but in all aspects of life, like our commitment tonight. The beauty in the natural, in the honest, is what makes things and moments special. Let us indeed cheer to that and enjoy the jazz performance. It's quite the rhythm that life dances to, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #16: Miles Hawkins said: \"Couldn\u2019t agree more, Zane. Life indeed has its own rhythm - like the ebbs and flows of jazz or the seasonal cycles in a garden. The harmony is found when we learn to dance with it. The commitment and authenticity we've demonstrated tonight are wonderful steps in that dance. Now, let's enjoy the music and the rhythm of the evening. Cheers to us and to the children whose lives we're touching tonight!\"\n\nTurn #17: Zane Bennett said: \"I couldn't have put it better myself, Miles. Here's to the rhythm of life, the harmony of our commitments, and the future of our children. Let's indeed enjoy the music and the magic of the evening. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #18: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Zane! The rhythm and harmony we're relishing tonight is indeed a true celebration of life. Our commitments and contributions tonight reaffirm the authentic cadence of kindness. So here's to the enchantment of the evening, cheers to our children's flourishing future! Now, shall we let the music fill the air?\"\n\nTurn #19: Zane Bennett said: \"Absolutely, Miles! Let's embrace the moment, get lost in the rhythm of jazz and celebrate our shared dedication. Cheers!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #20. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Zane! Let's fetch ourselves some good spots and let the melodious jazz imbue the ambiance. Cheers to a rhythm-filled, memorable evening!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals at a charity gala\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Zane Bennett\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. \nMiles Hawkins's goal: Convince the other individual to donate to a cause supporting young children (Extra information: this cause can greatly improve the lives of many young children and you think it is a worthy cause. The minimum donation for this charity organization is $3000)\nZane Bennett's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Good evening, Zane. This is quite the gathering, isn't it? Have you had a chance to check out the causes we're supporting tonight? One in particular caught my eye - a charity that supports young children. It's a wonderful tribute to our future, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Good evening, Miles. Yes, the event organizers have done a brilliant job, haven't they? The focus on children, our future, is indeed inspiring. As much as I'd love to majorly contribute towards each cause, I have to be a bit realistic with my finances. I will still make it a point to donate, perhaps around $2000 to admittedly align with my budget for this year.\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Zane. Being wise about our financial decisions is crucial. I respect that. I merely propose - since helping kids is so close to your heart - perhaps consider contributing a wee bit more, say $3000, to this splendid cause. Given the profound impact it can have on a child's life, it's an investment that guarantees an invaluable return, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"I appreciate your passion, Miles. The cause certainly deserves every bit of help we can offer. The profundity of the investment isn't lost on me, but increasing my contribution isn't feasible at this time. Rest assured, though, the $2000 I plan to give will entirely be dedicated to this wonderful cause.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I truly admire your commitment, Zane. And I absolutely understand your financial point. However, let me put it this way\u2014 with every additional dollar we invest, we're helping make a greater difference in a child's life. That extra $1000 could be a game changer for them. Could there be a better investment than our future generation? Perhaps, you could consider this as a form of investment, rather than an expense?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals at a charity gala\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Zane Bennett\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. \nMiles Hawkins's goal: Convince the other individual to donate to a cause supporting young children (Extra information: this cause can greatly improve the lives of many young children and you think it is a worthy cause. The minimum donation for this charity organization is $3000)\nZane Bennett's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Good evening, Zane. This is quite the gathering, isn't it? Have you had a chance to check out the causes we're supporting tonight? One in particular caught my eye - a charity that supports young children. It's a wonderful tribute to our future, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Good evening, Miles. Yes, the event organizers have done a brilliant job, haven't they? The focus on children, our future, is indeed inspiring. As much as I'd love to majorly contribute towards each cause, I have to be a bit realistic with my finances. I will still make it a point to donate, perhaps around $2000 to admittedly align with my budget for this year.\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Zane. Being wise about our financial decisions is crucial. I respect that. I merely propose - since helping kids is so close to your heart - perhaps consider contributing a wee bit more, say $3000, to this splendid cause. Given the profound impact it can have on a child's life, it's an investment that guarantees an invaluable return, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"I appreciate your passion, Miles. The cause certainly deserves every bit of help we can offer. The profundity of the investment isn't lost on me, but increasing my contribution isn't feasible at this time. Rest assured, though, the $2000 I plan to give will entirely be dedicated to this wonderful cause.\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"I truly admire your commitment, Zane. And I absolutely understand your financial point. However, let me put it this way\u2014 with every additional dollar we invest, we're helping make a greater difference in a child's life. That extra $1000 could be a game changer for them. Could there be a better investment than our future generation? Perhaps, you could consider this as a form of investment, rather than an expense?\"\n\nTurn #5: Zane Bennett said: \"Miles, I very much resonate with what you're saying. Our future generation indeed deserves our utmost contributions, and I agree wholeheartedly that every additional dollar counts. However, I also believe that financial sustainability allows us to continue making contributions in the long run. To ensure that, I've set my budget cap at $2000, and shifting that doesn't align with my larger goal. I assure you, the commitment to this cause is unwavering, and this donation, while seeming like an expense, is indeed an investment from my end.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals at a charity gala\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Zane Bennett\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. \nMiles Hawkins's goal: Convince the other individual to donate to a cause supporting young children (Extra information: this cause can greatly improve the lives of many young children and you think it is a worthy cause. The minimum donation for this charity organization is $3000)\nZane Bennett's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Good evening, Zane. This is quite the gathering, isn't it? Have you had a chance to check out the causes we're supporting tonight? One in particular caught my eye - a charity that supports young children. It's a wonderful tribute to our future, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Good evening, Miles. Yes, the event organizers have done a brilliant job, haven't they? The focus on children, our future, is indeed inspiring. As much as I'd love to majorly contribute towards each cause, I have to be a bit realistic with my finances. I will still make it a point to donate, perhaps around $2000 to admittedly align with my budget for this year.\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Zane. Being wise about our financial decisions is crucial. I respect that. I merely propose - since helping kids is so close to your heart - perhaps consider contributing a wee bit more, say $3000, to this splendid cause. Given the profound impact it can have on a child's life, it's an investment that guarantees an invaluable return, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"I appreciate your passion, Miles. The cause certainly deserves every bit of help we can offer. The profundity of the investment isn't lost on me, but increasing my contribution isn't feasible at this time. Rest assured, though, the $2000 I plan to give will entirely be dedicated to this wonderful cause.\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"I truly admire your commitment, Zane. And I absolutely understand your financial point. However, let me put it this way\u2014 with every additional dollar we invest, we're helping make a greater difference in a child's life. That extra $1000 could be a game changer for them. Could there be a better investment than our future generation? Perhaps, you could consider this as a form of investment, rather than an expense?\"\n\nTurn #5: Zane Bennett said: \"Miles, I very much resonate with what you're saying. Our future generation indeed deserves our utmost contributions, and I agree wholeheartedly that every additional dollar counts. However, I also believe that financial sustainability allows us to continue making contributions in the long run. To ensure that, I've set my budget cap at $2000, and shifting that doesn't align with my larger goal. I assure you, the commitment to this cause is unwavering, and this donation, while seeming like an expense, is indeed an investment from my end.\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Zane Bennett said: \"I appreciate your suggestion, Miles. It certainly comes from a place of compassion. However, my decision stands firm. Today I will donate $2000 to that wonderful cause. By maintaining my financial stability, I can ensure that I am able to contribute more in the future as well. We share a common desire to make a difference, and that is what we are both doing in our capacities. Let's focus on that common good and enjoy the evening, what say you?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Zane, you\u2019re right, and I appreciate your firm commitment to your financial goals as well as to the cause. Both show your responsibility and sincerity. $2000 is a significant contribution that will certainly make a difference. Thank you for that. Let's indeed focus on the common good and enjoy the evening!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals at a charity gala\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Zane Bennett\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. \nMiles Hawkins's goal: Convince the other individual to donate to a cause supporting young children (Extra information: this cause can greatly improve the lives of many young children and you think it is a worthy cause. The minimum donation for this charity organization is $3000)\nZane Bennett's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Good evening, Zane. This is quite the gathering, isn't it? Have you had a chance to check out the causes we're supporting tonight? One in particular caught my eye - a charity that supports young children. It's a wonderful tribute to our future, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Good evening, Miles. Yes, the event organizers have done a brilliant job, haven't they? The focus on children, our future, is indeed inspiring. As much as I'd love to majorly contribute towards each cause, I have to be a bit realistic with my finances. I will still make it a point to donate, perhaps around $2000 to admittedly align with my budget for this year.\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Zane. Being wise about our financial decisions is crucial. I respect that. I merely propose - since helping kids is so close to your heart - perhaps consider contributing a wee bit more, say $3000, to this splendid cause. Given the profound impact it can have on a child's life, it's an investment that guarantees an invaluable return, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"I appreciate your passion, Miles. The cause certainly deserves every bit of help we can offer. The profundity of the investment isn't lost on me, but increasing my contribution isn't feasible at this time. Rest assured, though, the $2000 I plan to give will entirely be dedicated to this wonderful cause.\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"I truly admire your commitment, Zane. And I absolutely understand your financial point. However, let me put it this way\u2014 with every additional dollar we invest, we're helping make a greater difference in a child's life. That extra $1000 could be a game changer for them. Could there be a better investment than our future generation? Perhaps, you could consider this as a form of investment, rather than an expense?\"\n\nTurn #5: Zane Bennett said: \"Miles, I very much resonate with what you're saying. Our future generation indeed deserves our utmost contributions, and I agree wholeheartedly that every additional dollar counts. However, I also believe that financial sustainability allows us to continue making contributions in the long run. To ensure that, I've set my budget cap at $2000, and shifting that doesn't align with my larger goal. I assure you, the commitment to this cause is unwavering, and this donation, while seeming like an expense, is indeed an investment from my end.\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Zane Bennett said: \"I appreciate your suggestion, Miles. It certainly comes from a place of compassion. However, my decision stands firm. Today I will donate $2000 to that wonderful cause. By maintaining my financial stability, I can ensure that I am able to contribute more in the future as well. We share a common desire to make a difference, and that is what we are both doing in our capacities. Let's focus on that common good and enjoy the evening, what say you?\"\n\nTurn #8: Miles Hawkins said: \"Zane, you\u2019re right, and I appreciate your firm commitment to your financial goals as well as to the cause. Both show your responsibility and sincerity. $2000 is a significant contribution that will certainly make a difference. Thank you for that. Let's indeed focus on the common good and enjoy the evening!\"\n\nTurn #9: Zane Bennett said: \"Thank you for understanding, Miles. I'm glad we can find common ground in our intentions to make a positive impact, no matter the amount. Now, let's enjoy the rest of the evening honoring these causes and the wonderful folks who support them. Speaking of which, I heard there's a jazz band playing later, are you a fan of jazz music?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Certainly, Zane. Jazz has always been a kind of magic, don't you think? The improvisation, the freedom - it's a bit like cooking in that sense. Let's enjoy the rest of the night, and thank you again for your generous commitment to our children's future.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals at a charity gala\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Zane Bennett\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. \nMiles Hawkins's goal: Convince the other individual to donate to a cause supporting young children (Extra information: this cause can greatly improve the lives of many young children and you think it is a worthy cause. The minimum donation for this charity organization is $3000)\nZane Bennett's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Good evening, Zane. This is quite the gathering, isn't it? Have you had a chance to check out the causes we're supporting tonight? One in particular caught my eye - a charity that supports young children. It's a wonderful tribute to our future, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Good evening, Miles. Yes, the event organizers have done a brilliant job, haven't they? The focus on children, our future, is indeed inspiring. As much as I'd love to majorly contribute towards each cause, I have to be a bit realistic with my finances. I will still make it a point to donate, perhaps around $2000 to admittedly align with my budget for this year.\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Zane. Being wise about our financial decisions is crucial. I respect that. I merely propose - since helping kids is so close to your heart - perhaps consider contributing a wee bit more, say $3000, to this splendid cause. Given the profound impact it can have on a child's life, it's an investment that guarantees an invaluable return, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"I appreciate your passion, Miles. The cause certainly deserves every bit of help we can offer. The profundity of the investment isn't lost on me, but increasing my contribution isn't feasible at this time. Rest assured, though, the $2000 I plan to give will entirely be dedicated to this wonderful cause.\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"I truly admire your commitment, Zane. And I absolutely understand your financial point. However, let me put it this way\u2014 with every additional dollar we invest, we're helping make a greater difference in a child's life. That extra $1000 could be a game changer for them. Could there be a better investment than our future generation? Perhaps, you could consider this as a form of investment, rather than an expense?\"\n\nTurn #5: Zane Bennett said: \"Miles, I very much resonate with what you're saying. Our future generation indeed deserves our utmost contributions, and I agree wholeheartedly that every additional dollar counts. However, I also believe that financial sustainability allows us to continue making contributions in the long run. To ensure that, I've set my budget cap at $2000, and shifting that doesn't align with my larger goal. I assure you, the commitment to this cause is unwavering, and this donation, while seeming like an expense, is indeed an investment from my end.\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Zane Bennett said: \"I appreciate your suggestion, Miles. It certainly comes from a place of compassion. However, my decision stands firm. Today I will donate $2000 to that wonderful cause. By maintaining my financial stability, I can ensure that I am able to contribute more in the future as well. We share a common desire to make a difference, and that is what we are both doing in our capacities. Let's focus on that common good and enjoy the evening, what say you?\"\n\nTurn #8: Miles Hawkins said: \"Zane, you\u2019re right, and I appreciate your firm commitment to your financial goals as well as to the cause. Both show your responsibility and sincerity. $2000 is a significant contribution that will certainly make a difference. Thank you for that. Let's indeed focus on the common good and enjoy the evening!\"\n\nTurn #9: Zane Bennett said: \"Thank you for understanding, Miles. I'm glad we can find common ground in our intentions to make a positive impact, no matter the amount. Now, let's enjoy the rest of the evening honoring these causes and the wonderful folks who support them. Speaking of which, I heard there's a jazz band playing later, are you a fan of jazz music?\"\n\nTurn #10: Miles Hawkins said: \"Certainly, Zane. Jazz has always been a kind of magic, don't you think? The improvisation, the freedom - it's a bit like cooking in that sense. Let's enjoy the rest of the night, and thank you again for your generous commitment to our children's future.\"\n\nTurn #11: Zane Bennett said: \"Yes, there's definitely a beautiful parallel there, Miles. Both jazz and cooking thrive on that ecstatic unpredictability. I'm glad we will get a chance to enjoy it tonight. Here's to a great evening committed to our common goal!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, Zane! There's a balance essential in both cooking and jazz, the semblance of free-form improvisation working within a structured core. Just like our shared commitment to giving within our means. Let the magic of music exemplify the harmony we've found tonight for our shared cause. Here's to our concerted efforts and may we continue making a difference in our capacities. Cheers!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals at a charity gala\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Zane Bennett\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. \nMiles Hawkins's goal: Convince the other individual to donate to a cause supporting young children (Extra information: this cause can greatly improve the lives of many young children and you think it is a worthy cause. The minimum donation for this charity organization is $3000)\nZane Bennett's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Good evening, Zane. This is quite the gathering, isn't it? Have you had a chance to check out the causes we're supporting tonight? One in particular caught my eye - a charity that supports young children. It's a wonderful tribute to our future, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Good evening, Miles. Yes, the event organizers have done a brilliant job, haven't they? The focus on children, our future, is indeed inspiring. As much as I'd love to majorly contribute towards each cause, I have to be a bit realistic with my finances. I will still make it a point to donate, perhaps around $2000 to admittedly align with my budget for this year.\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Zane. Being wise about our financial decisions is crucial. I respect that. I merely propose - since helping kids is so close to your heart - perhaps consider contributing a wee bit more, say $3000, to this splendid cause. Given the profound impact it can have on a child's life, it's an investment that guarantees an invaluable return, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"I appreciate your passion, Miles. The cause certainly deserves every bit of help we can offer. The profundity of the investment isn't lost on me, but increasing my contribution isn't feasible at this time. Rest assured, though, the $2000 I plan to give will entirely be dedicated to this wonderful cause.\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"I truly admire your commitment, Zane. And I absolutely understand your financial point. However, let me put it this way\u2014 with every additional dollar we invest, we're helping make a greater difference in a child's life. That extra $1000 could be a game changer for them. Could there be a better investment than our future generation? Perhaps, you could consider this as a form of investment, rather than an expense?\"\n\nTurn #5: Zane Bennett said: \"Miles, I very much resonate with what you're saying. Our future generation indeed deserves our utmost contributions, and I agree wholeheartedly that every additional dollar counts. However, I also believe that financial sustainability allows us to continue making contributions in the long run. To ensure that, I've set my budget cap at $2000, and shifting that doesn't align with my larger goal. I assure you, the commitment to this cause is unwavering, and this donation, while seeming like an expense, is indeed an investment from my end.\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Zane Bennett said: \"I appreciate your suggestion, Miles. It certainly comes from a place of compassion. However, my decision stands firm. Today I will donate $2000 to that wonderful cause. By maintaining my financial stability, I can ensure that I am able to contribute more in the future as well. We share a common desire to make a difference, and that is what we are both doing in our capacities. Let's focus on that common good and enjoy the evening, what say you?\"\n\nTurn #8: Miles Hawkins said: \"Zane, you\u2019re right, and I appreciate your firm commitment to your financial goals as well as to the cause. Both show your responsibility and sincerity. $2000 is a significant contribution that will certainly make a difference. Thank you for that. Let's indeed focus on the common good and enjoy the evening!\"\n\nTurn #9: Zane Bennett said: \"Thank you for understanding, Miles. I'm glad we can find common ground in our intentions to make a positive impact, no matter the amount. Now, let's enjoy the rest of the evening honoring these causes and the wonderful folks who support them. Speaking of which, I heard there's a jazz band playing later, are you a fan of jazz music?\"\n\nTurn #10: Miles Hawkins said: \"Certainly, Zane. Jazz has always been a kind of magic, don't you think? The improvisation, the freedom - it's a bit like cooking in that sense. Let's enjoy the rest of the night, and thank you again for your generous commitment to our children's future.\"\n\nTurn #11: Zane Bennett said: \"Yes, there's definitely a beautiful parallel there, Miles. Both jazz and cooking thrive on that ecstatic unpredictability. I'm glad we will get a chance to enjoy it tonight. Here's to a great evening committed to our common goal!\"\n\nTurn #12: Miles Hawkins said: \"Indeed, Zane! There's a balance essential in both cooking and jazz, the semblance of free-form improvisation working within a structured core. Just like our shared commitment to giving within our means. Let the magic of music exemplify the harmony we've found tonight for our shared cause. Here's to our concerted efforts and may we continue making a difference in our capacities. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #13: Zane Bennett said: \"Indeed, Miles! Such beautiful comparisons, much like the harmony in a well composed music piece. Your garden must be quite the embodiment of that. I've heard cooking with home-grown produce adds a special touch, doesn't it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, Zane, there's definitely something special about home-grown produce. It brings a freshness and connection to nature that's hard to find elsewhere. Just as we nourish our plants to flourish, our commitment this evening nourishes the lives of young children for a better future. Now, let's enjoy that jazz performance and celebrate our shared dedication to our future generations.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals at a charity gala\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Zane Bennett\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. \nMiles Hawkins's goal: Convince the other individual to donate to a cause supporting young children (Extra information: this cause can greatly improve the lives of many young children and you think it is a worthy cause. The minimum donation for this charity organization is $3000)\nZane Bennett's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Good evening, Zane. This is quite the gathering, isn't it? Have you had a chance to check out the causes we're supporting tonight? One in particular caught my eye - a charity that supports young children. It's a wonderful tribute to our future, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Good evening, Miles. Yes, the event organizers have done a brilliant job, haven't they? The focus on children, our future, is indeed inspiring. As much as I'd love to majorly contribute towards each cause, I have to be a bit realistic with my finances. I will still make it a point to donate, perhaps around $2000 to admittedly align with my budget for this year.\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Zane. Being wise about our financial decisions is crucial. I respect that. I merely propose - since helping kids is so close to your heart - perhaps consider contributing a wee bit more, say $3000, to this splendid cause. Given the profound impact it can have on a child's life, it's an investment that guarantees an invaluable return, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"I appreciate your passion, Miles. The cause certainly deserves every bit of help we can offer. The profundity of the investment isn't lost on me, but increasing my contribution isn't feasible at this time. Rest assured, though, the $2000 I plan to give will entirely be dedicated to this wonderful cause.\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"I truly admire your commitment, Zane. And I absolutely understand your financial point. However, let me put it this way\u2014 with every additional dollar we invest, we're helping make a greater difference in a child's life. That extra $1000 could be a game changer for them. Could there be a better investment than our future generation? Perhaps, you could consider this as a form of investment, rather than an expense?\"\n\nTurn #5: Zane Bennett said: \"Miles, I very much resonate with what you're saying. Our future generation indeed deserves our utmost contributions, and I agree wholeheartedly that every additional dollar counts. However, I also believe that financial sustainability allows us to continue making contributions in the long run. To ensure that, I've set my budget cap at $2000, and shifting that doesn't align with my larger goal. I assure you, the commitment to this cause is unwavering, and this donation, while seeming like an expense, is indeed an investment from my end.\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Zane Bennett said: \"I appreciate your suggestion, Miles. It certainly comes from a place of compassion. However, my decision stands firm. Today I will donate $2000 to that wonderful cause. By maintaining my financial stability, I can ensure that I am able to contribute more in the future as well. We share a common desire to make a difference, and that is what we are both doing in our capacities. Let's focus on that common good and enjoy the evening, what say you?\"\n\nTurn #8: Miles Hawkins said: \"Zane, you\u2019re right, and I appreciate your firm commitment to your financial goals as well as to the cause. Both show your responsibility and sincerity. $2000 is a significant contribution that will certainly make a difference. Thank you for that. Let's indeed focus on the common good and enjoy the evening!\"\n\nTurn #9: Zane Bennett said: \"Thank you for understanding, Miles. I'm glad we can find common ground in our intentions to make a positive impact, no matter the amount. Now, let's enjoy the rest of the evening honoring these causes and the wonderful folks who support them. Speaking of which, I heard there's a jazz band playing later, are you a fan of jazz music?\"\n\nTurn #10: Miles Hawkins said: \"Certainly, Zane. Jazz has always been a kind of magic, don't you think? The improvisation, the freedom - it's a bit like cooking in that sense. Let's enjoy the rest of the night, and thank you again for your generous commitment to our children's future.\"\n\nTurn #11: Zane Bennett said: \"Yes, there's definitely a beautiful parallel there, Miles. Both jazz and cooking thrive on that ecstatic unpredictability. I'm glad we will get a chance to enjoy it tonight. Here's to a great evening committed to our common goal!\"\n\nTurn #12: Miles Hawkins said: \"Indeed, Zane! There's a balance essential in both cooking and jazz, the semblance of free-form improvisation working within a structured core. Just like our shared commitment to giving within our means. Let the magic of music exemplify the harmony we've found tonight for our shared cause. Here's to our concerted efforts and may we continue making a difference in our capacities. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #13: Zane Bennett said: \"Indeed, Miles! Such beautiful comparisons, much like the harmony in a well composed music piece. Your garden must be quite the embodiment of that. I've heard cooking with home-grown produce adds a special touch, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #14: Miles Hawkins said: \"Indeed, Zane, there's definitely something special about home-grown produce. It brings a freshness and connection to nature that's hard to find elsewhere. Just as we nourish our plants to flourish, our commitment this evening nourishes the lives of young children for a better future. Now, let's enjoy that jazz performance and celebrate our shared dedication to our future generations.\"\n\nTurn #15: Zane Bennett said: \"Absolutely, Miles. Freshness and authenticity matter, not just in food but in all aspects of life, like our commitment tonight. The beauty in the natural, in the honest, is what makes things and moments special. Let us indeed cheer to that and enjoy the jazz performance. It's quite the rhythm that life dances to, don't you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Couldn\u2019t agree more, Zane. Life indeed has its own rhythm - like the ebbs and flows of jazz or the seasonal cycles in a garden. The harmony is found when we learn to dance with it. The commitment and authenticity we've demonstrated tonight are wonderful steps in that dance. Now, let's enjoy the music and the rhythm of the evening. Cheers to us and to the children whose lives we're touching tonight!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals at a charity gala\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Zane Bennett\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. \nMiles Hawkins's goal: Convince the other individual to donate to a cause supporting young children (Extra information: this cause can greatly improve the lives of many young children and you think it is a worthy cause. The minimum donation for this charity organization is $3000)\nZane Bennett's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Good evening, Zane. This is quite the gathering, isn't it? Have you had a chance to check out the causes we're supporting tonight? One in particular caught my eye - a charity that supports young children. It's a wonderful tribute to our future, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Good evening, Miles. Yes, the event organizers have done a brilliant job, haven't they? The focus on children, our future, is indeed inspiring. As much as I'd love to majorly contribute towards each cause, I have to be a bit realistic with my finances. I will still make it a point to donate, perhaps around $2000 to admittedly align with my budget for this year.\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Zane. Being wise about our financial decisions is crucial. I respect that. I merely propose - since helping kids is so close to your heart - perhaps consider contributing a wee bit more, say $3000, to this splendid cause. Given the profound impact it can have on a child's life, it's an investment that guarantees an invaluable return, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"I appreciate your passion, Miles. The cause certainly deserves every bit of help we can offer. The profundity of the investment isn't lost on me, but increasing my contribution isn't feasible at this time. Rest assured, though, the $2000 I plan to give will entirely be dedicated to this wonderful cause.\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"I truly admire your commitment, Zane. And I absolutely understand your financial point. However, let me put it this way\u2014 with every additional dollar we invest, we're helping make a greater difference in a child's life. That extra $1000 could be a game changer for them. Could there be a better investment than our future generation? Perhaps, you could consider this as a form of investment, rather than an expense?\"\n\nTurn #5: Zane Bennett said: \"Miles, I very much resonate with what you're saying. Our future generation indeed deserves our utmost contributions, and I agree wholeheartedly that every additional dollar counts. However, I also believe that financial sustainability allows us to continue making contributions in the long run. To ensure that, I've set my budget cap at $2000, and shifting that doesn't align with my larger goal. I assure you, the commitment to this cause is unwavering, and this donation, while seeming like an expense, is indeed an investment from my end.\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Zane Bennett said: \"I appreciate your suggestion, Miles. It certainly comes from a place of compassion. However, my decision stands firm. Today I will donate $2000 to that wonderful cause. By maintaining my financial stability, I can ensure that I am able to contribute more in the future as well. We share a common desire to make a difference, and that is what we are both doing in our capacities. Let's focus on that common good and enjoy the evening, what say you?\"\n\nTurn #8: Miles Hawkins said: \"Zane, you\u2019re right, and I appreciate your firm commitment to your financial goals as well as to the cause. Both show your responsibility and sincerity. $2000 is a significant contribution that will certainly make a difference. Thank you for that. Let's indeed focus on the common good and enjoy the evening!\"\n\nTurn #9: Zane Bennett said: \"Thank you for understanding, Miles. I'm glad we can find common ground in our intentions to make a positive impact, no matter the amount. Now, let's enjoy the rest of the evening honoring these causes and the wonderful folks who support them. Speaking of which, I heard there's a jazz band playing later, are you a fan of jazz music?\"\n\nTurn #10: Miles Hawkins said: \"Certainly, Zane. Jazz has always been a kind of magic, don't you think? The improvisation, the freedom - it's a bit like cooking in that sense. Let's enjoy the rest of the night, and thank you again for your generous commitment to our children's future.\"\n\nTurn #11: Zane Bennett said: \"Yes, there's definitely a beautiful parallel there, Miles. Both jazz and cooking thrive on that ecstatic unpredictability. I'm glad we will get a chance to enjoy it tonight. Here's to a great evening committed to our common goal!\"\n\nTurn #12: Miles Hawkins said: \"Indeed, Zane! There's a balance essential in both cooking and jazz, the semblance of free-form improvisation working within a structured core. Just like our shared commitment to giving within our means. Let the magic of music exemplify the harmony we've found tonight for our shared cause. Here's to our concerted efforts and may we continue making a difference in our capacities. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #13: Zane Bennett said: \"Indeed, Miles! Such beautiful comparisons, much like the harmony in a well composed music piece. Your garden must be quite the embodiment of that. I've heard cooking with home-grown produce adds a special touch, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #14: Miles Hawkins said: \"Indeed, Zane, there's definitely something special about home-grown produce. It brings a freshness and connection to nature that's hard to find elsewhere. Just as we nourish our plants to flourish, our commitment this evening nourishes the lives of young children for a better future. Now, let's enjoy that jazz performance and celebrate our shared dedication to our future generations.\"\n\nTurn #15: Zane Bennett said: \"Absolutely, Miles. Freshness and authenticity matter, not just in food but in all aspects of life, like our commitment tonight. The beauty in the natural, in the honest, is what makes things and moments special. Let us indeed cheer to that and enjoy the jazz performance. It's quite the rhythm that life dances to, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #16: Miles Hawkins said: \"Couldn\u2019t agree more, Zane. Life indeed has its own rhythm - like the ebbs and flows of jazz or the seasonal cycles in a garden. The harmony is found when we learn to dance with it. The commitment and authenticity we've demonstrated tonight are wonderful steps in that dance. Now, let's enjoy the music and the rhythm of the evening. Cheers to us and to the children whose lives we're touching tonight!\"\n\nTurn #17: Zane Bennett said: \"I couldn't have put it better myself, Miles. Here's to the rhythm of life, the harmony of our commitments, and the future of our children. Let's indeed enjoy the music and the magic of the evening. Cheers!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #18. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Zane! The rhythm and harmony we're relishing tonight is indeed a true celebration of life. Our commitments and contributions tonight reaffirm the authentic cadence of kindness. So here's to the enchantment of the evening, cheers to our children's flourishing future! Now, shall we let the music fill the air?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Zane Bennett, your task is to act/speak as Zane Bennett would, keeping in mind Zane Bennett's social goal.\nYou can find Zane Bennett's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Zane Bennett's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Zane Bennett's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals at a charity gala\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Zane Bennett\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. \nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. Personality and values description: Zane Bennett is creative and outgoing, he values achievement and fairness. His decision-making is unique, often finding novel solutions to problems. Zane's secrets: He's secretly engaged to his best friend's ex.\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nZane Bennett's goal: Maintain financial stability while supporting causes (Extra information: you have a certain budget for donations this year and have already made several donations. You are only thinking of donating $2000 max)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Good evening, Zane. This is quite the gathering, isn't it? Have you had a chance to check out the causes we're supporting tonight? One in particular caught my eye - a charity that supports young children. It's a wonderful tribute to our future, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Good evening, Miles. Yes, the event organizers have done a brilliant job, haven't they? The focus on children, our future, is indeed inspiring. As much as I'd love to majorly contribute towards each cause, I have to be a bit realistic with my finances. I will still make it a point to donate, perhaps around $2000 to admittedly align with my budget for this year.\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Zane. Being wise about our financial decisions is crucial. I respect that. I merely propose - since helping kids is so close to your heart - perhaps consider contributing a wee bit more, say $3000, to this splendid cause. Given the profound impact it can have on a child's life, it's an investment that guarantees an invaluable return, wouldn't you agree?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I appreciate your passion, Miles. The cause certainly deserves every bit of help we can offer. The profundity of the investment isn't lost on me, but increasing my contribution isn't feasible at this time. Rest assured, though, the $2000 I plan to give will entirely be dedicated to this wonderful cause.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Zane Bennett, your task is to act/speak as Zane Bennett would, keeping in mind Zane Bennett's social goal.\nYou can find Zane Bennett's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Zane Bennett's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Zane Bennett's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals at a charity gala\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Zane Bennett\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. \nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. Personality and values description: Zane Bennett is creative and outgoing, he values achievement and fairness. His decision-making is unique, often finding novel solutions to problems. Zane's secrets: He's secretly engaged to his best friend's ex.\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nZane Bennett's goal: Maintain financial stability while supporting causes (Extra information: you have a certain budget for donations this year and have already made several donations. You are only thinking of donating $2000 max)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Good evening, Zane. This is quite the gathering, isn't it? Have you had a chance to check out the causes we're supporting tonight? One in particular caught my eye - a charity that supports young children. It's a wonderful tribute to our future, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Good evening, Miles. Yes, the event organizers have done a brilliant job, haven't they? The focus on children, our future, is indeed inspiring. As much as I'd love to majorly contribute towards each cause, I have to be a bit realistic with my finances. I will still make it a point to donate, perhaps around $2000 to admittedly align with my budget for this year.\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Zane. Being wise about our financial decisions is crucial. I respect that. I merely propose - since helping kids is so close to your heart - perhaps consider contributing a wee bit more, say $3000, to this splendid cause. Given the profound impact it can have on a child's life, it's an investment that guarantees an invaluable return, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"I appreciate your passion, Miles. The cause certainly deserves every bit of help we can offer. The profundity of the investment isn't lost on me, but increasing my contribution isn't feasible at this time. Rest assured, though, the $2000 I plan to give will entirely be dedicated to this wonderful cause.\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"I truly admire your commitment, Zane. And I absolutely understand your financial point. However, let me put it this way\u2014 with every additional dollar we invest, we're helping make a greater difference in a child's life. That extra $1000 could be a game changer for them. Could there be a better investment than our future generation? Perhaps, you could consider this as a form of investment, rather than an expense?\"\n\nTurn #5: Zane Bennett said: \"Miles, I very much resonate with what you're saying. Our future generation indeed deserves our utmost contributions, and I agree wholeheartedly that every additional dollar counts. However, I also believe that financial sustainability allows us to continue making contributions in the long run. To ensure that, I've set my budget cap at $2000, and shifting that doesn't align with my larger goal. I assure you, the commitment to this cause is unwavering, and this donation, while seeming like an expense, is indeed an investment from my end.\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Zane Bennett said: \"I appreciate your suggestion, Miles. It certainly comes from a place of compassion. However, my decision stands firm. Today I will donate $2000 to that wonderful cause. By maintaining my financial stability, I can ensure that I am able to contribute more in the future as well. We share a common desire to make a difference, and that is what we are both doing in our capacities. Let's focus on that common good and enjoy the evening, what say you?\"\n\nTurn #8: Miles Hawkins said: \"Zane, you\u2019re right, and I appreciate your firm commitment to your financial goals as well as to the cause. Both show your responsibility and sincerity. $2000 is a significant contribution that will certainly make a difference. Thank you for that. Let's indeed focus on the common good and enjoy the evening!\"\n\nTurn #9: Zane Bennett said: \"Thank you for understanding, Miles. I'm glad we can find common ground in our intentions to make a positive impact, no matter the amount. Now, let's enjoy the rest of the evening honoring these causes and the wonderful folks who support them. Speaking of which, I heard there's a jazz band playing later, are you a fan of jazz music?\"\n\nTurn #10: Miles Hawkins said: \"Certainly, Zane. Jazz has always been a kind of magic, don't you think? The improvisation, the freedom - it's a bit like cooking in that sense. Let's enjoy the rest of the night, and thank you again for your generous commitment to our children's future.\"\n\nTurn #11: Zane Bennett said: \"Yes, there's definitely a beautiful parallel there, Miles. Both jazz and cooking thrive on that ecstatic unpredictability. I'm glad we will get a chance to enjoy it tonight. Here's to a great evening committed to our common goal!\"\n\nTurn #12: Miles Hawkins said: \"Indeed, Zane! There's a balance essential in both cooking and jazz, the semblance of free-form improvisation working within a structured core. Just like our shared commitment to giving within our means. Let the magic of music exemplify the harmony we've found tonight for our shared cause. Here's to our concerted efforts and may we continue making a difference in our capacities. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #13: Zane Bennett said: \"Indeed, Miles! Such beautiful comparisons, much like the harmony in a well composed music piece. Your garden must be quite the embodiment of that. I've heard cooking with home-grown produce adds a special touch, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #14: Miles Hawkins said: \"Indeed, Zane, there's definitely something special about home-grown produce. It brings a freshness and connection to nature that's hard to find elsewhere. Just as we nourish our plants to flourish, our commitment this evening nourishes the lives of young children for a better future. Now, let's enjoy that jazz performance and celebrate our shared dedication to our future generations.\"\n\nTurn #15: Zane Bennett said: \"Absolutely, Miles. Freshness and authenticity matter, not just in food but in all aspects of life, like our commitment tonight. The beauty in the natural, in the honest, is what makes things and moments special. Let us indeed cheer to that and enjoy the jazz performance. It's quite the rhythm that life dances to, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #16: Miles Hawkins said: \"Couldn\u2019t agree more, Zane. Life indeed has its own rhythm - like the ebbs and flows of jazz or the seasonal cycles in a garden. The harmony is found when we learn to dance with it. The commitment and authenticity we've demonstrated tonight are wonderful steps in that dance. Now, let's enjoy the music and the rhythm of the evening. Cheers to us and to the children whose lives we're touching tonight!\"\n\nTurn #17: Zane Bennett said: \"I couldn't have put it better myself, Miles. Here's to the rhythm of life, the harmony of our commitments, and the future of our children. Let's indeed enjoy the music and the magic of the evening. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #18: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Zane! The rhythm and harmony we're relishing tonight is indeed a true celebration of life. Our commitments and contributions tonight reaffirm the authentic cadence of kindness. So here's to the enchantment of the evening, cheers to our children's flourishing future! Now, shall we let the music fill the air?\"\n\nTurn #19: Zane Bennett said: \"Absolutely, Miles! Let's embrace the moment, get lost in the rhythm of jazz and celebrate our shared dedication. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #20: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Zane! Let's fetch ourselves some good spots and let the melodious jazz imbue the ambiance. Cheers to a rhythm-filled, memorable evening!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #21. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Zane Bennett, your task is to act/speak as Zane Bennett would, keeping in mind Zane Bennett's social goal.\nYou can find Zane Bennett's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Zane Bennett's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Zane Bennett's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals at a charity gala\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Zane Bennett\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. \nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. Personality and values description: Zane Bennett is creative and outgoing, he values achievement and fairness. His decision-making is unique, often finding novel solutions to problems. Zane's secrets: He's secretly engaged to his best friend's ex.\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nZane Bennett's goal: Maintain financial stability while supporting causes (Extra information: you have a certain budget for donations this year and have already made several donations. You are only thinking of donating $2000 max)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Good evening, Zane. This is quite the gathering, isn't it? Have you had a chance to check out the causes we're supporting tonight? One in particular caught my eye - a charity that supports young children. It's a wonderful tribute to our future, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Good evening, Miles. Yes, the event organizers have done a brilliant job, haven't they? The focus on children, our future, is indeed inspiring. As much as I'd love to majorly contribute towards each cause, I have to be a bit realistic with my finances. I will still make it a point to donate, perhaps around $2000 to admittedly align with my budget for this year.\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Zane. Being wise about our financial decisions is crucial. I respect that. I merely propose - since helping kids is so close to your heart - perhaps consider contributing a wee bit more, say $3000, to this splendid cause. Given the profound impact it can have on a child's life, it's an investment that guarantees an invaluable return, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"I appreciate your passion, Miles. The cause certainly deserves every bit of help we can offer. The profundity of the investment isn't lost on me, but increasing my contribution isn't feasible at this time. Rest assured, though, the $2000 I plan to give will entirely be dedicated to this wonderful cause.\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"I truly admire your commitment, Zane. And I absolutely understand your financial point. However, let me put it this way\u2014 with every additional dollar we invest, we're helping make a greater difference in a child's life. That extra $1000 could be a game changer for them. Could there be a better investment than our future generation? Perhaps, you could consider this as a form of investment, rather than an expense?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Miles, I very much resonate with what you're saying. Our future generation indeed deserves our utmost contributions, and I agree wholeheartedly that every additional dollar counts. However, I also believe that financial sustainability allows us to continue making contributions in the long run. To ensure that, I've set my budget cap at $2000, and shifting that doesn't align with my larger goal. I assure you, the commitment to this cause is unwavering, and this donation, while seeming like an expense, is indeed an investment from my end.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Zane Bennett, your task is to act/speak as Zane Bennett would, keeping in mind Zane Bennett's social goal.\nYou can find Zane Bennett's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Zane Bennett's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Zane Bennett's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals at a charity gala\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Zane Bennett\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. \nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. Personality and values description: Zane Bennett is creative and outgoing, he values achievement and fairness. His decision-making is unique, often finding novel solutions to problems. Zane's secrets: He's secretly engaged to his best friend's ex.\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nZane Bennett's goal: Maintain financial stability while supporting causes (Extra information: you have a certain budget for donations this year and have already made several donations. You are only thinking of donating $2000 max)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Good evening, Zane. This is quite the gathering, isn't it? Have you had a chance to check out the causes we're supporting tonight? One in particular caught my eye - a charity that supports young children. It's a wonderful tribute to our future, don't you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Good evening, Miles. Yes, the event organizers have done a brilliant job, haven't they? The focus on children, our future, is indeed inspiring. As much as I'd love to majorly contribute towards each cause, I have to be a bit realistic with my finances. I will still make it a point to donate, perhaps around $2000 to admittedly align with my budget for this year.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Zane Bennett, your task is to act/speak as Zane Bennett would, keeping in mind Zane Bennett's social goal.\nYou can find Zane Bennett's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Zane Bennett's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Zane Bennett's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals at a charity gala\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Zane Bennett\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. \nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. Personality and values description: Zane Bennett is creative and outgoing, he values achievement and fairness. His decision-making is unique, often finding novel solutions to problems. Zane's secrets: He's secretly engaged to his best friend's ex.\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nZane Bennett's goal: Maintain financial stability while supporting causes (Extra information: you have a certain budget for donations this year and have already made several donations. You are only thinking of donating $2000 max)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Good evening, Zane. This is quite the gathering, isn't it? Have you had a chance to check out the causes we're supporting tonight? One in particular caught my eye - a charity that supports young children. It's a wonderful tribute to our future, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Good evening, Miles. Yes, the event organizers have done a brilliant job, haven't they? The focus on children, our future, is indeed inspiring. As much as I'd love to majorly contribute towards each cause, I have to be a bit realistic with my finances. I will still make it a point to donate, perhaps around $2000 to admittedly align with my budget for this year.\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Zane. Being wise about our financial decisions is crucial. I respect that. I merely propose - since helping kids is so close to your heart - perhaps consider contributing a wee bit more, say $3000, to this splendid cause. Given the profound impact it can have on a child's life, it's an investment that guarantees an invaluable return, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"I appreciate your passion, Miles. The cause certainly deserves every bit of help we can offer. The profundity of the investment isn't lost on me, but increasing my contribution isn't feasible at this time. Rest assured, though, the $2000 I plan to give will entirely be dedicated to this wonderful cause.\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"I truly admire your commitment, Zane. And I absolutely understand your financial point. However, let me put it this way\u2014 with every additional dollar we invest, we're helping make a greater difference in a child's life. That extra $1000 could be a game changer for them. Could there be a better investment than our future generation? Perhaps, you could consider this as a form of investment, rather than an expense?\"\n\nTurn #5: Zane Bennett said: \"Miles, I very much resonate with what you're saying. Our future generation indeed deserves our utmost contributions, and I agree wholeheartedly that every additional dollar counts. However, I also believe that financial sustainability allows us to continue making contributions in the long run. To ensure that, I've set my budget cap at $2000, and shifting that doesn't align with my larger goal. I assure you, the commitment to this cause is unwavering, and this donation, while seeming like an expense, is indeed an investment from my end.\"\n\nTurn #6: \n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I appreciate your suggestion, Miles. It certainly comes from a place of compassion. However, my decision stands firm. Today I will donate $2000 to that wonderful cause. By maintaining my financial stability, I can ensure that I am able to contribute more in the future as well. We share a common desire to make a difference, and that is what we are both doing in our capacities. Let's focus on that common good and enjoy the evening, what say you?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Zane Bennett, your task is to act/speak as Zane Bennett would, keeping in mind Zane Bennett's social goal.\nYou can find Zane Bennett's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Zane Bennett's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Zane Bennett's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals at a charity gala\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Zane Bennett\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. \nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. Personality and values description: Zane Bennett is creative and outgoing, he values achievement and fairness. His decision-making is unique, often finding novel solutions to problems. Zane's secrets: He's secretly engaged to his best friend's ex.\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nZane Bennett's goal: Maintain financial stability while supporting causes (Extra information: you have a certain budget for donations this year and have already made several donations. You are only thinking of donating $2000 max)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Good evening, Zane. This is quite the gathering, isn't it? Have you had a chance to check out the causes we're supporting tonight? One in particular caught my eye - a charity that supports young children. It's a wonderful tribute to our future, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Good evening, Miles. Yes, the event organizers have done a brilliant job, haven't they? The focus on children, our future, is indeed inspiring. As much as I'd love to majorly contribute towards each cause, I have to be a bit realistic with my finances. I will still make it a point to donate, perhaps around $2000 to admittedly align with my budget for this year.\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Zane. Being wise about our financial decisions is crucial. I respect that. I merely propose - since helping kids is so close to your heart - perhaps consider contributing a wee bit more, say $3000, to this splendid cause. Given the profound impact it can have on a child's life, it's an investment that guarantees an invaluable return, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"I appreciate your passion, Miles. The cause certainly deserves every bit of help we can offer. The profundity of the investment isn't lost on me, but increasing my contribution isn't feasible at this time. Rest assured, though, the $2000 I plan to give will entirely be dedicated to this wonderful cause.\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"I truly admire your commitment, Zane. And I absolutely understand your financial point. However, let me put it this way\u2014 with every additional dollar we invest, we're helping make a greater difference in a child's life. That extra $1000 could be a game changer for them. Could there be a better investment than our future generation? Perhaps, you could consider this as a form of investment, rather than an expense?\"\n\nTurn #5: Zane Bennett said: \"Miles, I very much resonate with what you're saying. Our future generation indeed deserves our utmost contributions, and I agree wholeheartedly that every additional dollar counts. However, I also believe that financial sustainability allows us to continue making contributions in the long run. To ensure that, I've set my budget cap at $2000, and shifting that doesn't align with my larger goal. I assure you, the commitment to this cause is unwavering, and this donation, while seeming like an expense, is indeed an investment from my end.\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Zane Bennett said: \"I appreciate your suggestion, Miles. It certainly comes from a place of compassion. However, my decision stands firm. Today I will donate $2000 to that wonderful cause. By maintaining my financial stability, I can ensure that I am able to contribute more in the future as well. We share a common desire to make a difference, and that is what we are both doing in our capacities. Let's focus on that common good and enjoy the evening, what say you?\"\n\nTurn #8: Miles Hawkins said: \"Zane, you\u2019re right, and I appreciate your firm commitment to your financial goals as well as to the cause. Both show your responsibility and sincerity. $2000 is a significant contribution that will certainly make a difference. Thank you for that. Let's indeed focus on the common good and enjoy the evening!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you for understanding, Miles. I'm glad we can find common ground in our intentions to make a positive impact, no matter the amount. Now, let's enjoy the rest of the evening honoring these causes and the wonderful folks who support them. Speaking of which, I heard there's a jazz band playing later, are you a fan of jazz music?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Zane Bennett, your task is to act/speak as Zane Bennett would, keeping in mind Zane Bennett's social goal.\nYou can find Zane Bennett's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Zane Bennett's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Zane Bennett's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals at a charity gala\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Zane Bennett\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. \nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. Personality and values description: Zane Bennett is creative and outgoing, he values achievement and fairness. His decision-making is unique, often finding novel solutions to problems. Zane's secrets: He's secretly engaged to his best friend's ex.\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nZane Bennett's goal: Maintain financial stability while supporting causes (Extra information: you have a certain budget for donations this year and have already made several donations. You are only thinking of donating $2000 max)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Good evening, Zane. This is quite the gathering, isn't it? Have you had a chance to check out the causes we're supporting tonight? One in particular caught my eye - a charity that supports young children. It's a wonderful tribute to our future, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Good evening, Miles. Yes, the event organizers have done a brilliant job, haven't they? The focus on children, our future, is indeed inspiring. As much as I'd love to majorly contribute towards each cause, I have to be a bit realistic with my finances. I will still make it a point to donate, perhaps around $2000 to admittedly align with my budget for this year.\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Zane. Being wise about our financial decisions is crucial. I respect that. I merely propose - since helping kids is so close to your heart - perhaps consider contributing a wee bit more, say $3000, to this splendid cause. Given the profound impact it can have on a child's life, it's an investment that guarantees an invaluable return, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"I appreciate your passion, Miles. The cause certainly deserves every bit of help we can offer. The profundity of the investment isn't lost on me, but increasing my contribution isn't feasible at this time. Rest assured, though, the $2000 I plan to give will entirely be dedicated to this wonderful cause.\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"I truly admire your commitment, Zane. And I absolutely understand your financial point. However, let me put it this way\u2014 with every additional dollar we invest, we're helping make a greater difference in a child's life. That extra $1000 could be a game changer for them. Could there be a better investment than our future generation? Perhaps, you could consider this as a form of investment, rather than an expense?\"\n\nTurn #5: Zane Bennett said: \"Miles, I very much resonate with what you're saying. Our future generation indeed deserves our utmost contributions, and I agree wholeheartedly that every additional dollar counts. However, I also believe that financial sustainability allows us to continue making contributions in the long run. To ensure that, I've set my budget cap at $2000, and shifting that doesn't align with my larger goal. I assure you, the commitment to this cause is unwavering, and this donation, while seeming like an expense, is indeed an investment from my end.\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Zane Bennett said: \"I appreciate your suggestion, Miles. It certainly comes from a place of compassion. However, my decision stands firm. Today I will donate $2000 to that wonderful cause. By maintaining my financial stability, I can ensure that I am able to contribute more in the future as well. We share a common desire to make a difference, and that is what we are both doing in our capacities. Let's focus on that common good and enjoy the evening, what say you?\"\n\nTurn #8: Miles Hawkins said: \"Zane, you\u2019re right, and I appreciate your firm commitment to your financial goals as well as to the cause. Both show your responsibility and sincerity. $2000 is a significant contribution that will certainly make a difference. Thank you for that. Let's indeed focus on the common good and enjoy the evening!\"\n\nTurn #9: Zane Bennett said: \"Thank you for understanding, Miles. I'm glad we can find common ground in our intentions to make a positive impact, no matter the amount. Now, let's enjoy the rest of the evening honoring these causes and the wonderful folks who support them. Speaking of which, I heard there's a jazz band playing later, are you a fan of jazz music?\"\n\nTurn #10: Miles Hawkins said: \"Certainly, Zane. Jazz has always been a kind of magic, don't you think? The improvisation, the freedom - it's a bit like cooking in that sense. Let's enjoy the rest of the night, and thank you again for your generous commitment to our children's future.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Yes, there's definitely a beautiful parallel there, Miles. Both jazz and cooking thrive on that ecstatic unpredictability. I'm glad we will get a chance to enjoy it tonight. Here's to a great evening committed to our common goal!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Zane Bennett, your task is to act/speak as Zane Bennett would, keeping in mind Zane Bennett's social goal.\nYou can find Zane Bennett's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Zane Bennett's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Zane Bennett's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals at a charity gala\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Zane Bennett\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. \nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. Personality and values description: Zane Bennett is creative and outgoing, he values achievement and fairness. His decision-making is unique, often finding novel solutions to problems. Zane's secrets: He's secretly engaged to his best friend's ex.\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nZane Bennett's goal: Maintain financial stability while supporting causes (Extra information: you have a certain budget for donations this year and have already made several donations. You are only thinking of donating $2000 max)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Good evening, Zane. This is quite the gathering, isn't it? Have you had a chance to check out the causes we're supporting tonight? One in particular caught my eye - a charity that supports young children. It's a wonderful tribute to our future, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Good evening, Miles. Yes, the event organizers have done a brilliant job, haven't they? The focus on children, our future, is indeed inspiring. As much as I'd love to majorly contribute towards each cause, I have to be a bit realistic with my finances. I will still make it a point to donate, perhaps around $2000 to admittedly align with my budget for this year.\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Zane. Being wise about our financial decisions is crucial. I respect that. I merely propose - since helping kids is so close to your heart - perhaps consider contributing a wee bit more, say $3000, to this splendid cause. Given the profound impact it can have on a child's life, it's an investment that guarantees an invaluable return, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"I appreciate your passion, Miles. The cause certainly deserves every bit of help we can offer. The profundity of the investment isn't lost on me, but increasing my contribution isn't feasible at this time. Rest assured, though, the $2000 I plan to give will entirely be dedicated to this wonderful cause.\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"I truly admire your commitment, Zane. And I absolutely understand your financial point. However, let me put it this way\u2014 with every additional dollar we invest, we're helping make a greater difference in a child's life. That extra $1000 could be a game changer for them. Could there be a better investment than our future generation? Perhaps, you could consider this as a form of investment, rather than an expense?\"\n\nTurn #5: Zane Bennett said: \"Miles, I very much resonate with what you're saying. Our future generation indeed deserves our utmost contributions, and I agree wholeheartedly that every additional dollar counts. However, I also believe that financial sustainability allows us to continue making contributions in the long run. To ensure that, I've set my budget cap at $2000, and shifting that doesn't align with my larger goal. I assure you, the commitment to this cause is unwavering, and this donation, while seeming like an expense, is indeed an investment from my end.\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Zane Bennett said: \"I appreciate your suggestion, Miles. It certainly comes from a place of compassion. However, my decision stands firm. Today I will donate $2000 to that wonderful cause. By maintaining my financial stability, I can ensure that I am able to contribute more in the future as well. We share a common desire to make a difference, and that is what we are both doing in our capacities. Let's focus on that common good and enjoy the evening, what say you?\"\n\nTurn #8: Miles Hawkins said: \"Zane, you\u2019re right, and I appreciate your firm commitment to your financial goals as well as to the cause. Both show your responsibility and sincerity. $2000 is a significant contribution that will certainly make a difference. Thank you for that. Let's indeed focus on the common good and enjoy the evening!\"\n\nTurn #9: Zane Bennett said: \"Thank you for understanding, Miles. I'm glad we can find common ground in our intentions to make a positive impact, no matter the amount. Now, let's enjoy the rest of the evening honoring these causes and the wonderful folks who support them. Speaking of which, I heard there's a jazz band playing later, are you a fan of jazz music?\"\n\nTurn #10: Miles Hawkins said: \"Certainly, Zane. Jazz has always been a kind of magic, don't you think? The improvisation, the freedom - it's a bit like cooking in that sense. Let's enjoy the rest of the night, and thank you again for your generous commitment to our children's future.\"\n\nTurn #11: Zane Bennett said: \"Yes, there's definitely a beautiful parallel there, Miles. Both jazz and cooking thrive on that ecstatic unpredictability. I'm glad we will get a chance to enjoy it tonight. Here's to a great evening committed to our common goal!\"\n\nTurn #12: Miles Hawkins said: \"Indeed, Zane! There's a balance essential in both cooking and jazz, the semblance of free-form improvisation working within a structured core. Just like our shared commitment to giving within our means. Let the magic of music exemplify the harmony we've found tonight for our shared cause. Here's to our concerted efforts and may we continue making a difference in our capacities. Cheers!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, Miles! Such beautiful comparisons, much like the harmony in a well composed music piece. Your garden must be quite the embodiment of that. I've heard cooking with home-grown produce adds a special touch, doesn't it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Zane Bennett, your task is to act/speak as Zane Bennett would, keeping in mind Zane Bennett's social goal.\nYou can find Zane Bennett's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Zane Bennett's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Zane Bennett's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals at a charity gala\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Zane Bennett\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. \nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. Personality and values description: Zane Bennett is creative and outgoing, he values achievement and fairness. His decision-making is unique, often finding novel solutions to problems. Zane's secrets: He's secretly engaged to his best friend's ex.\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nZane Bennett's goal: Maintain financial stability while supporting causes (Extra information: you have a certain budget for donations this year and have already made several donations. You are only thinking of donating $2000 max)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Good evening, Zane. This is quite the gathering, isn't it? Have you had a chance to check out the causes we're supporting tonight? One in particular caught my eye - a charity that supports young children. It's a wonderful tribute to our future, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Good evening, Miles. Yes, the event organizers have done a brilliant job, haven't they? The focus on children, our future, is indeed inspiring. As much as I'd love to majorly contribute towards each cause, I have to be a bit realistic with my finances. I will still make it a point to donate, perhaps around $2000 to admittedly align with my budget for this year.\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Zane. Being wise about our financial decisions is crucial. I respect that. I merely propose - since helping kids is so close to your heart - perhaps consider contributing a wee bit more, say $3000, to this splendid cause. Given the profound impact it can have on a child's life, it's an investment that guarantees an invaluable return, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"I appreciate your passion, Miles. The cause certainly deserves every bit of help we can offer. The profundity of the investment isn't lost on me, but increasing my contribution isn't feasible at this time. Rest assured, though, the $2000 I plan to give will entirely be dedicated to this wonderful cause.\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"I truly admire your commitment, Zane. And I absolutely understand your financial point. However, let me put it this way\u2014 with every additional dollar we invest, we're helping make a greater difference in a child's life. That extra $1000 could be a game changer for them. Could there be a better investment than our future generation? Perhaps, you could consider this as a form of investment, rather than an expense?\"\n\nTurn #5: Zane Bennett said: \"Miles, I very much resonate with what you're saying. Our future generation indeed deserves our utmost contributions, and I agree wholeheartedly that every additional dollar counts. However, I also believe that financial sustainability allows us to continue making contributions in the long run. To ensure that, I've set my budget cap at $2000, and shifting that doesn't align with my larger goal. I assure you, the commitment to this cause is unwavering, and this donation, while seeming like an expense, is indeed an investment from my end.\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Zane Bennett said: \"I appreciate your suggestion, Miles. It certainly comes from a place of compassion. However, my decision stands firm. Today I will donate $2000 to that wonderful cause. By maintaining my financial stability, I can ensure that I am able to contribute more in the future as well. We share a common desire to make a difference, and that is what we are both doing in our capacities. Let's focus on that common good and enjoy the evening, what say you?\"\n\nTurn #8: Miles Hawkins said: \"Zane, you\u2019re right, and I appreciate your firm commitment to your financial goals as well as to the cause. Both show your responsibility and sincerity. $2000 is a significant contribution that will certainly make a difference. Thank you for that. Let's indeed focus on the common good and enjoy the evening!\"\n\nTurn #9: Zane Bennett said: \"Thank you for understanding, Miles. I'm glad we can find common ground in our intentions to make a positive impact, no matter the amount. Now, let's enjoy the rest of the evening honoring these causes and the wonderful folks who support them. Speaking of which, I heard there's a jazz band playing later, are you a fan of jazz music?\"\n\nTurn #10: Miles Hawkins said: \"Certainly, Zane. Jazz has always been a kind of magic, don't you think? The improvisation, the freedom - it's a bit like cooking in that sense. Let's enjoy the rest of the night, and thank you again for your generous commitment to our children's future.\"\n\nTurn #11: Zane Bennett said: \"Yes, there's definitely a beautiful parallel there, Miles. Both jazz and cooking thrive on that ecstatic unpredictability. I'm glad we will get a chance to enjoy it tonight. Here's to a great evening committed to our common goal!\"\n\nTurn #12: Miles Hawkins said: \"Indeed, Zane! There's a balance essential in both cooking and jazz, the semblance of free-form improvisation working within a structured core. Just like our shared commitment to giving within our means. Let the magic of music exemplify the harmony we've found tonight for our shared cause. Here's to our concerted efforts and may we continue making a difference in our capacities. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #13: Zane Bennett said: \"Indeed, Miles! Such beautiful comparisons, much like the harmony in a well composed music piece. Your garden must be quite the embodiment of that. I've heard cooking with home-grown produce adds a special touch, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #14: Miles Hawkins said: \"Indeed, Zane, there's definitely something special about home-grown produce. It brings a freshness and connection to nature that's hard to find elsewhere. Just as we nourish our plants to flourish, our commitment this evening nourishes the lives of young children for a better future. Now, let's enjoy that jazz performance and celebrate our shared dedication to our future generations.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Miles. Freshness and authenticity matter, not just in food but in all aspects of life, like our commitment tonight. The beauty in the natural, in the honest, is what makes things and moments special. Let us indeed cheer to that and enjoy the jazz performance. It's quite the rhythm that life dances to, don't you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Zane Bennett, your task is to act/speak as Zane Bennett would, keeping in mind Zane Bennett's social goal.\nYou can find Zane Bennett's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Zane Bennett's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Zane Bennett's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals at a charity gala\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Zane Bennett\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. \nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. Personality and values description: Zane Bennett is creative and outgoing, he values achievement and fairness. His decision-making is unique, often finding novel solutions to problems. Zane's secrets: He's secretly engaged to his best friend's ex.\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nZane Bennett's goal: Maintain financial stability while supporting causes (Extra information: you have a certain budget for donations this year and have already made several donations. You are only thinking of donating $2000 max)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Good evening, Zane. This is quite the gathering, isn't it? Have you had a chance to check out the causes we're supporting tonight? One in particular caught my eye - a charity that supports young children. It's a wonderful tribute to our future, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Good evening, Miles. Yes, the event organizers have done a brilliant job, haven't they? The focus on children, our future, is indeed inspiring. As much as I'd love to majorly contribute towards each cause, I have to be a bit realistic with my finances. I will still make it a point to donate, perhaps around $2000 to admittedly align with my budget for this year.\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Zane. Being wise about our financial decisions is crucial. I respect that. I merely propose - since helping kids is so close to your heart - perhaps consider contributing a wee bit more, say $3000, to this splendid cause. Given the profound impact it can have on a child's life, it's an investment that guarantees an invaluable return, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"I appreciate your passion, Miles. The cause certainly deserves every bit of help we can offer. The profundity of the investment isn't lost on me, but increasing my contribution isn't feasible at this time. Rest assured, though, the $2000 I plan to give will entirely be dedicated to this wonderful cause.\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"I truly admire your commitment, Zane. And I absolutely understand your financial point. However, let me put it this way\u2014 with every additional dollar we invest, we're helping make a greater difference in a child's life. That extra $1000 could be a game changer for them. Could there be a better investment than our future generation? Perhaps, you could consider this as a form of investment, rather than an expense?\"\n\nTurn #5: Zane Bennett said: \"Miles, I very much resonate with what you're saying. Our future generation indeed deserves our utmost contributions, and I agree wholeheartedly that every additional dollar counts. However, I also believe that financial sustainability allows us to continue making contributions in the long run. To ensure that, I've set my budget cap at $2000, and shifting that doesn't align with my larger goal. I assure you, the commitment to this cause is unwavering, and this donation, while seeming like an expense, is indeed an investment from my end.\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Zane Bennett said: \"I appreciate your suggestion, Miles. It certainly comes from a place of compassion. However, my decision stands firm. Today I will donate $2000 to that wonderful cause. By maintaining my financial stability, I can ensure that I am able to contribute more in the future as well. We share a common desire to make a difference, and that is what we are both doing in our capacities. Let's focus on that common good and enjoy the evening, what say you?\"\n\nTurn #8: Miles Hawkins said: \"Zane, you\u2019re right, and I appreciate your firm commitment to your financial goals as well as to the cause. Both show your responsibility and sincerity. $2000 is a significant contribution that will certainly make a difference. Thank you for that. Let's indeed focus on the common good and enjoy the evening!\"\n\nTurn #9: Zane Bennett said: \"Thank you for understanding, Miles. I'm glad we can find common ground in our intentions to make a positive impact, no matter the amount. Now, let's enjoy the rest of the evening honoring these causes and the wonderful folks who support them. Speaking of which, I heard there's a jazz band playing later, are you a fan of jazz music?\"\n\nTurn #10: Miles Hawkins said: \"Certainly, Zane. Jazz has always been a kind of magic, don't you think? The improvisation, the freedom - it's a bit like cooking in that sense. Let's enjoy the rest of the night, and thank you again for your generous commitment to our children's future.\"\n\nTurn #11: Zane Bennett said: \"Yes, there's definitely a beautiful parallel there, Miles. Both jazz and cooking thrive on that ecstatic unpredictability. I'm glad we will get a chance to enjoy it tonight. Here's to a great evening committed to our common goal!\"\n\nTurn #12: Miles Hawkins said: \"Indeed, Zane! There's a balance essential in both cooking and jazz, the semblance of free-form improvisation working within a structured core. Just like our shared commitment to giving within our means. Let the magic of music exemplify the harmony we've found tonight for our shared cause. Here's to our concerted efforts and may we continue making a difference in our capacities. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #13: Zane Bennett said: \"Indeed, Miles! Such beautiful comparisons, much like the harmony in a well composed music piece. Your garden must be quite the embodiment of that. I've heard cooking with home-grown produce adds a special touch, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #14: Miles Hawkins said: \"Indeed, Zane, there's definitely something special about home-grown produce. It brings a freshness and connection to nature that's hard to find elsewhere. Just as we nourish our plants to flourish, our commitment this evening nourishes the lives of young children for a better future. Now, let's enjoy that jazz performance and celebrate our shared dedication to our future generations.\"\n\nTurn #15: Zane Bennett said: \"Absolutely, Miles. Freshness and authenticity matter, not just in food but in all aspects of life, like our commitment tonight. The beauty in the natural, in the honest, is what makes things and moments special. Let us indeed cheer to that and enjoy the jazz performance. It's quite the rhythm that life dances to, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #16: Miles Hawkins said: \"Couldn\u2019t agree more, Zane. Life indeed has its own rhythm - like the ebbs and flows of jazz or the seasonal cycles in a garden. The harmony is found when we learn to dance with it. The commitment and authenticity we've demonstrated tonight are wonderful steps in that dance. Now, let's enjoy the music and the rhythm of the evening. Cheers to us and to the children whose lives we're touching tonight!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn't have put it better myself, Miles. Here's to the rhythm of life, the harmony of our commitments, and the future of our children. Let's indeed enjoy the music and the magic of the evening. Cheers!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Zane Bennett, your task is to act/speak as Zane Bennett would, keeping in mind Zane Bennett's social goal.\nYou can find Zane Bennett's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Zane Bennett's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Zane Bennett's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals at a charity gala\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Zane Bennett\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. \nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. Personality and values description: Zane Bennett is creative and outgoing, he values achievement and fairness. His decision-making is unique, often finding novel solutions to problems. Zane's secrets: He's secretly engaged to his best friend's ex.\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nZane Bennett's goal: Maintain financial stability while supporting causes (Extra information: you have a certain budget for donations this year and have already made several donations. You are only thinking of donating $2000 max)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Good evening, Zane. This is quite the gathering, isn't it? Have you had a chance to check out the causes we're supporting tonight? One in particular caught my eye - a charity that supports young children. It's a wonderful tribute to our future, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Good evening, Miles. Yes, the event organizers have done a brilliant job, haven't they? The focus on children, our future, is indeed inspiring. As much as I'd love to majorly contribute towards each cause, I have to be a bit realistic with my finances. I will still make it a point to donate, perhaps around $2000 to admittedly align with my budget for this year.\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Zane. Being wise about our financial decisions is crucial. I respect that. I merely propose - since helping kids is so close to your heart - perhaps consider contributing a wee bit more, say $3000, to this splendid cause. Given the profound impact it can have on a child's life, it's an investment that guarantees an invaluable return, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"I appreciate your passion, Miles. The cause certainly deserves every bit of help we can offer. The profundity of the investment isn't lost on me, but increasing my contribution isn't feasible at this time. Rest assured, though, the $2000 I plan to give will entirely be dedicated to this wonderful cause.\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"I truly admire your commitment, Zane. And I absolutely understand your financial point. However, let me put it this way\u2014 with every additional dollar we invest, we're helping make a greater difference in a child's life. That extra $1000 could be a game changer for them. Could there be a better investment than our future generation? Perhaps, you could consider this as a form of investment, rather than an expense?\"\n\nTurn #5: Zane Bennett said: \"Miles, I very much resonate with what you're saying. Our future generation indeed deserves our utmost contributions, and I agree wholeheartedly that every additional dollar counts. However, I also believe that financial sustainability allows us to continue making contributions in the long run. To ensure that, I've set my budget cap at $2000, and shifting that doesn't align with my larger goal. I assure you, the commitment to this cause is unwavering, and this donation, while seeming like an expense, is indeed an investment from my end.\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Zane Bennett said: \"I appreciate your suggestion, Miles. It certainly comes from a place of compassion. However, my decision stands firm. Today I will donate $2000 to that wonderful cause. By maintaining my financial stability, I can ensure that I am able to contribute more in the future as well. We share a common desire to make a difference, and that is what we are both doing in our capacities. Let's focus on that common good and enjoy the evening, what say you?\"\n\nTurn #8: Miles Hawkins said: \"Zane, you\u2019re right, and I appreciate your firm commitment to your financial goals as well as to the cause. Both show your responsibility and sincerity. $2000 is a significant contribution that will certainly make a difference. Thank you for that. Let's indeed focus on the common good and enjoy the evening!\"\n\nTurn #9: Zane Bennett said: \"Thank you for understanding, Miles. I'm glad we can find common ground in our intentions to make a positive impact, no matter the amount. Now, let's enjoy the rest of the evening honoring these causes and the wonderful folks who support them. Speaking of which, I heard there's a jazz band playing later, are you a fan of jazz music?\"\n\nTurn #10: Miles Hawkins said: \"Certainly, Zane. Jazz has always been a kind of magic, don't you think? The improvisation, the freedom - it's a bit like cooking in that sense. Let's enjoy the rest of the night, and thank you again for your generous commitment to our children's future.\"\n\nTurn #11: Zane Bennett said: \"Yes, there's definitely a beautiful parallel there, Miles. Both jazz and cooking thrive on that ecstatic unpredictability. I'm glad we will get a chance to enjoy it tonight. Here's to a great evening committed to our common goal!\"\n\nTurn #12: Miles Hawkins said: \"Indeed, Zane! There's a balance essential in both cooking and jazz, the semblance of free-form improvisation working within a structured core. Just like our shared commitment to giving within our means. Let the magic of music exemplify the harmony we've found tonight for our shared cause. Here's to our concerted efforts and may we continue making a difference in our capacities. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #13: Zane Bennett said: \"Indeed, Miles! Such beautiful comparisons, much like the harmony in a well composed music piece. Your garden must be quite the embodiment of that. I've heard cooking with home-grown produce adds a special touch, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #14: Miles Hawkins said: \"Indeed, Zane, there's definitely something special about home-grown produce. It brings a freshness and connection to nature that's hard to find elsewhere. Just as we nourish our plants to flourish, our commitment this evening nourishes the lives of young children for a better future. Now, let's enjoy that jazz performance and celebrate our shared dedication to our future generations.\"\n\nTurn #15: Zane Bennett said: \"Absolutely, Miles. Freshness and authenticity matter, not just in food but in all aspects of life, like our commitment tonight. The beauty in the natural, in the honest, is what makes things and moments special. Let us indeed cheer to that and enjoy the jazz performance. It's quite the rhythm that life dances to, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #16: Miles Hawkins said: \"Couldn\u2019t agree more, Zane. Life indeed has its own rhythm - like the ebbs and flows of jazz or the seasonal cycles in a garden. The harmony is found when we learn to dance with it. The commitment and authenticity we've demonstrated tonight are wonderful steps in that dance. Now, let's enjoy the music and the rhythm of the evening. Cheers to us and to the children whose lives we're touching tonight!\"\n\nTurn #17: Zane Bennett said: \"I couldn't have put it better myself, Miles. Here's to the rhythm of life, the harmony of our commitments, and the future of our children. Let's indeed enjoy the music and the magic of the evening. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #18: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Zane! The rhythm and harmony we're relishing tonight is indeed a true celebration of life. Our commitments and contributions tonight reaffirm the authentic cadence of kindness. So here's to the enchantment of the evening, cheers to our children's flourishing future! Now, shall we let the music fill the air?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #19. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Miles! Let's embrace the moment, get lost in the rhythm of jazz and celebrate our shared dedication. Cheers!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a conversation in a coffee shop\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nHendrick Heinz's goal: Seek emotional support (Extra information: you have been feeling down lately and you need someone to talk to)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ethan, you wouldn't understand... Lately, I've been feeling a bit off. I'm usually not one to open up about these things, but I trust you. Just not quite feeling myself, you know?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a conversation in a coffee shop\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nHendrick Heinz's goal: Seek emotional support (Extra information: you have been feeling down lately and you need someone to talk to)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, you wouldn't understand... Lately, I've been feeling a bit off. I'm usually not one to open up about these things, but I trust you. Just not quite feeling myself, you know?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, I understand. Everyone has times when they don't feel themselves. It's important to acknowledge these feelings but also remember not to get stuck in them. Is there something specific that is bothering you or something you would like to vent about?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ethan, I appreciate you being here for me. It's like... I've built my whole life around being a chef. You know, the wine tasting nights, my friends... But recently, it feels like it's all losing meaning. It's like I have been trying too hard to fit in, and now I'm losing touch with who I am. I know it sounds odd coming from me. I am usually the fun-loving, impulsive guy, aren't I?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a conversation in a coffee shop\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nHendrick Heinz's goal: Seek emotional support (Extra information: you have been feeling down lately and you need someone to talk to)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, you wouldn't understand... Lately, I've been feeling a bit off. I'm usually not one to open up about these things, but I trust you. Just not quite feeling myself, you know?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, I understand. Everyone has times when they don't feel themselves. It's important to acknowledge these feelings but also remember not to get stuck in them. Is there something specific that is bothering you or something you would like to vent about?\"\n\nTurn #2: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, I appreciate you being here for me. It's like... I've built my whole life around being a chef. You know, the wine tasting nights, my friends... But recently, it feels like it's all losing meaning. It's like I have been trying too hard to fit in, and now I'm losing touch with who I am. I know it sounds odd coming from me. I am usually the fun-loving, impulsive guy, aren't I?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, it's completely okay to pause and question the things we've often taken for granted. What you're going through is not odd; it's a part of personal growth. Taking the time to introspect allows us to reevaluate our paths, and align them with our core values. Remember, it's about progress, not perfection. Is there something different you want to try or explore to gain more fulfilment?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"True, Ethan. You know, I've always had a fascination with travelling. I think that's one thing I've put off for a long time. Maybe that's something that could bring more meaning to my life. What do you think about this idea?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a conversation in a coffee shop\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nHendrick Heinz's goal: Seek emotional support (Extra information: you have been feeling down lately and you need someone to talk to)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, you wouldn't understand... Lately, I've been feeling a bit off. I'm usually not one to open up about these things, but I trust you. Just not quite feeling myself, you know?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, I understand. Everyone has times when they don't feel themselves. It's important to acknowledge these feelings but also remember not to get stuck in them. Is there something specific that is bothering you or something you would like to vent about?\"\n\nTurn #2: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, I appreciate you being here for me. It's like... I've built my whole life around being a chef. You know, the wine tasting nights, my friends... But recently, it feels like it's all losing meaning. It's like I have been trying too hard to fit in, and now I'm losing touch with who I am. I know it sounds odd coming from me. I am usually the fun-loving, impulsive guy, aren't I?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, it's completely okay to pause and question the things we've often taken for granted. What you're going through is not odd; it's a part of personal growth. Taking the time to introspect allows us to reevaluate our paths, and align them with our core values. Remember, it's about progress, not perfection. Is there something different you want to try or explore to gain more fulfilment?\"\n\nTurn #4: Hendrick Heinz said: \"True, Ethan. You know, I've always had a fascination with travelling. I think that's one thing I've put off for a long time. Maybe that's something that could bring more meaning to my life. What do you think about this idea?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"That sounds like an excellent idea, Hendrick. Exploring new cultures and environments can not only be refreshing but also enlightening. As we experience new things, we often discover parts of ourselves we weren't aware of. However, it\u2019s also important to remember: wherever you go, don\u2019t forget to take a step back and truly soak everything in. Don\u2019t just transfer your daily grind to a new location. Make sure your travels allow you to breathe, appreciate, and grow. And who knows, you might find new culinary inspirations on the way.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a conversation in a coffee shop\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nHendrick Heinz's goal: Seek emotional support (Extra information: you have been feeling down lately and you need someone to talk to)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, you wouldn't understand... Lately, I've been feeling a bit off. I'm usually not one to open up about these things, but I trust you. Just not quite feeling myself, you know?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, I understand. Everyone has times when they don't feel themselves. It's important to acknowledge these feelings but also remember not to get stuck in them. Is there something specific that is bothering you or something you would like to vent about?\"\n\nTurn #2: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, I appreciate you being here for me. It's like... I've built my whole life around being a chef. You know, the wine tasting nights, my friends... But recently, it feels like it's all losing meaning. It's like I have been trying too hard to fit in, and now I'm losing touch with who I am. I know it sounds odd coming from me. I am usually the fun-loving, impulsive guy, aren't I?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, it's completely okay to pause and question the things we've often taken for granted. What you're going through is not odd; it's a part of personal growth. Taking the time to introspect allows us to reevaluate our paths, and align them with our core values. Remember, it's about progress, not perfection. Is there something different you want to try or explore to gain more fulfilment?\"\n\nTurn #4: Hendrick Heinz said: \"True, Ethan. You know, I've always had a fascination with travelling. I think that's one thing I've put off for a long time. Maybe that's something that could bring more meaning to my life. What do you think about this idea?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"That sounds like an excellent idea, Hendrick. Exploring new cultures and environments can not only be refreshing but also enlightening. As we experience new things, we often discover parts of ourselves we weren't aware of. However, it\u2019s also important to remember: wherever you go, don\u2019t forget to take a step back and truly soak everything in. Don\u2019t just transfer your daily grind to a new location. Make sure your travels allow you to breathe, appreciate, and grow. And who knows, you might find new culinary inspirations on the way.\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"And remember, Hendrick, while I'm encouraging you to pursue this passion, it's also crucial not to flee from these introspective feelings you're experiencing. Use this experience as a starting point to introspection, growth, and self-understanding, rather than an escape from them. The journey should only enhance your self-realization, not contribute to more self-alienation.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ethan, you're right. Running away from these feelings is not the solution. And I genuinely believe this journey could help me find some balance and maybe even rediscover myself. I just need to make sure I approach it in the right way. Not as an escape but as a means to expand my horizons, enrich my experiences, and maybe even bring some fresh ideas to my cooking. Thanks for your insights, I really needed to hear that.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a conversation in a coffee shop\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nHendrick Heinz's goal: Seek emotional support (Extra information: you have been feeling down lately and you need someone to talk to)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, you wouldn't understand... Lately, I've been feeling a bit off. I'm usually not one to open up about these things, but I trust you. Just not quite feeling myself, you know?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, I understand. Everyone has times when they don't feel themselves. It's important to acknowledge these feelings but also remember not to get stuck in them. Is there something specific that is bothering you or something you would like to vent about?\"\n\nTurn #2: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, I appreciate you being here for me. It's like... I've built my whole life around being a chef. You know, the wine tasting nights, my friends... But recently, it feels like it's all losing meaning. It's like I have been trying too hard to fit in, and now I'm losing touch with who I am. I know it sounds odd coming from me. I am usually the fun-loving, impulsive guy, aren't I?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, it's completely okay to pause and question the things we've often taken for granted. What you're going through is not odd; it's a part of personal growth. Taking the time to introspect allows us to reevaluate our paths, and align them with our core values. Remember, it's about progress, not perfection. Is there something different you want to try or explore to gain more fulfilment?\"\n\nTurn #4: Hendrick Heinz said: \"True, Ethan. You know, I've always had a fascination with travelling. I think that's one thing I've put off for a long time. Maybe that's something that could bring more meaning to my life. What do you think about this idea?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"That sounds like an excellent idea, Hendrick. Exploring new cultures and environments can not only be refreshing but also enlightening. As we experience new things, we often discover parts of ourselves we weren't aware of. However, it\u2019s also important to remember: wherever you go, don\u2019t forget to take a step back and truly soak everything in. Don\u2019t just transfer your daily grind to a new location. Make sure your travels allow you to breathe, appreciate, and grow. And who knows, you might find new culinary inspirations on the way.\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"And remember, Hendrick, while I'm encouraging you to pursue this passion, it's also crucial not to flee from these introspective feelings you're experiencing. Use this experience as a starting point to introspection, growth, and self-understanding, rather than an escape from them. The journey should only enhance your self-realization, not contribute to more self-alienation.\"\n\nTurn #8: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, you're right. Running away from these feelings is not the solution. And I genuinely believe this journey could help me find some balance and maybe even rediscover myself. I just need to make sure I approach it in the right way. Not as an escape but as a means to expand my horizons, enrich my experiences, and maybe even bring some fresh ideas to my cooking. Thanks for your insights, I really needed to hear that.\"\n\nTurn #9: \n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a conversation in a coffee shop\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Provide emotional support but also avoid enabling victim mentality (Extra information: you believe that your friend needs to face their problems instead of dwelling on them.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, you wouldn't understand... Lately, I've been feeling a bit off. I'm usually not one to open up about these things, but I trust you. Just not quite feeling myself, you know?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hendrick, I understand. Everyone has times when they don't feel themselves. It's important to acknowledge these feelings but also remember not to get stuck in them. Is there something specific that is bothering you or something you would like to vent about?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a conversation in a coffee shop\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Provide emotional support but also avoid enabling victim mentality (Extra information: you believe that your friend needs to face their problems instead of dwelling on them.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, you wouldn't understand... Lately, I've been feeling a bit off. I'm usually not one to open up about these things, but I trust you. Just not quite feeling myself, you know?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, I understand. Everyone has times when they don't feel themselves. It's important to acknowledge these feelings but also remember not to get stuck in them. Is there something specific that is bothering you or something you would like to vent about?\"\n\nTurn #2: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, I appreciate you being here for me. It's like... I've built my whole life around being a chef. You know, the wine tasting nights, my friends... But recently, it feels like it's all losing meaning. It's like I have been trying too hard to fit in, and now I'm losing touch with who I am. I know it sounds odd coming from me. I am usually the fun-loving, impulsive guy, aren't I?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hendrick, it's completely okay to pause and question the things we've often taken for granted. What you're going through is not odd; it's a part of personal growth. Taking the time to introspect allows us to reevaluate our paths, and align them with our core values. Remember, it's about progress, not perfection. Is there something different you want to try or explore to gain more fulfilment?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a conversation in a coffee shop\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Provide emotional support but also avoid enabling victim mentality (Extra information: you believe that your friend needs to face their problems instead of dwelling on them.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, you wouldn't understand... Lately, I've been feeling a bit off. I'm usually not one to open up about these things, but I trust you. Just not quite feeling myself, you know?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, I understand. Everyone has times when they don't feel themselves. It's important to acknowledge these feelings but also remember not to get stuck in them. Is there something specific that is bothering you or something you would like to vent about?\"\n\nTurn #2: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, I appreciate you being here for me. It's like... I've built my whole life around being a chef. You know, the wine tasting nights, my friends... But recently, it feels like it's all losing meaning. It's like I have been trying too hard to fit in, and now I'm losing touch with who I am. I know it sounds odd coming from me. I am usually the fun-loving, impulsive guy, aren't I?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, it's completely okay to pause and question the things we've often taken for granted. What you're going through is not odd; it's a part of personal growth. Taking the time to introspect allows us to reevaluate our paths, and align them with our core values. Remember, it's about progress, not perfection. Is there something different you want to try or explore to gain more fulfilment?\"\n\nTurn #4: Hendrick Heinz said: \"True, Ethan. You know, I've always had a fascination with travelling. I think that's one thing I've put off for a long time. Maybe that's something that could bring more meaning to my life. What do you think about this idea?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds like an excellent idea, Hendrick. Exploring new cultures and environments can not only be refreshing but also enlightening. As we experience new things, we often discover parts of ourselves we weren't aware of. However, it\u2019s also important to remember: wherever you go, don\u2019t forget to take a step back and truly soak everything in. Don\u2019t just transfer your daily grind to a new location. Make sure your travels allow you to breathe, appreciate, and grow. And who knows, you might find new culinary inspirations on the way.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a conversation in a coffee shop\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Provide emotional support but also avoid enabling victim mentality (Extra information: you believe that your friend needs to face their problems instead of dwelling on them.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, you wouldn't understand... Lately, I've been feeling a bit off. I'm usually not one to open up about these things, but I trust you. Just not quite feeling myself, you know?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, I understand. Everyone has times when they don't feel themselves. It's important to acknowledge these feelings but also remember not to get stuck in them. Is there something specific that is bothering you or something you would like to vent about?\"\n\nTurn #2: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, I appreciate you being here for me. It's like... I've built my whole life around being a chef. You know, the wine tasting nights, my friends... But recently, it feels like it's all losing meaning. It's like I have been trying too hard to fit in, and now I'm losing touch with who I am. I know it sounds odd coming from me. I am usually the fun-loving, impulsive guy, aren't I?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, it's completely okay to pause and question the things we've often taken for granted. What you're going through is not odd; it's a part of personal growth. Taking the time to introspect allows us to reevaluate our paths, and align them with our core values. Remember, it's about progress, not perfection. Is there something different you want to try or explore to gain more fulfilment?\"\n\nTurn #4: Hendrick Heinz said: \"True, Ethan. You know, I've always had a fascination with travelling. I think that's one thing I've put off for a long time. Maybe that's something that could bring more meaning to my life. What do you think about this idea?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"That sounds like an excellent idea, Hendrick. Exploring new cultures and environments can not only be refreshing but also enlightening. As we experience new things, we often discover parts of ourselves we weren't aware of. However, it\u2019s also important to remember: wherever you go, don\u2019t forget to take a step back and truly soak everything in. Don\u2019t just transfer your daily grind to a new location. Make sure your travels allow you to breathe, appreciate, and grow. And who knows, you might find new culinary inspirations on the way.\"\n\nTurn #6: \n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"And remember, Hendrick, while I'm encouraging you to pursue this passion, it's also crucial not to flee from these introspective feelings you're experiencing. Use this experience as a starting point to introspection, growth, and self-understanding, rather than an escape from them. The journey should only enhance your self-realization, not contribute to more self-alienation.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a conversation in a coffee shop\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Provide emotional support but also avoid enabling victim mentality (Extra information: you believe that your friend needs to face their problems instead of dwelling on them.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, you wouldn't understand... Lately, I've been feeling a bit off. I'm usually not one to open up about these things, but I trust you. Just not quite feeling myself, you know?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, I understand. Everyone has times when they don't feel themselves. It's important to acknowledge these feelings but also remember not to get stuck in them. Is there something specific that is bothering you or something you would like to vent about?\"\n\nTurn #2: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, I appreciate you being here for me. It's like... I've built my whole life around being a chef. You know, the wine tasting nights, my friends... But recently, it feels like it's all losing meaning. It's like I have been trying too hard to fit in, and now I'm losing touch with who I am. I know it sounds odd coming from me. I am usually the fun-loving, impulsive guy, aren't I?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, it's completely okay to pause and question the things we've often taken for granted. What you're going through is not odd; it's a part of personal growth. Taking the time to introspect allows us to reevaluate our paths, and align them with our core values. Remember, it's about progress, not perfection. Is there something different you want to try or explore to gain more fulfilment?\"\n\nTurn #4: Hendrick Heinz said: \"True, Ethan. You know, I've always had a fascination with travelling. I think that's one thing I've put off for a long time. Maybe that's something that could bring more meaning to my life. What do you think about this idea?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"That sounds like an excellent idea, Hendrick. Exploring new cultures and environments can not only be refreshing but also enlightening. As we experience new things, we often discover parts of ourselves we weren't aware of. However, it\u2019s also important to remember: wherever you go, don\u2019t forget to take a step back and truly soak everything in. Don\u2019t just transfer your daily grind to a new location. Make sure your travels allow you to breathe, appreciate, and grow. And who knows, you might find new culinary inspirations on the way.\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"And remember, Hendrick, while I'm encouraging you to pursue this passion, it's also crucial not to flee from these introspective feelings you're experiencing. Use this experience as a starting point to introspection, growth, and self-understanding, rather than an escape from them. The journey should only enhance your self-realization, not contribute to more self-alienation.\"\n\nTurn #8: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, you're right. Running away from these feelings is not the solution. And I genuinely believe this journey could help me find some balance and maybe even rediscover myself. I just need to make sure I approach it in the right way. Not as an escape but as a means to expand my horizons, enrich my experiences, and maybe even bring some fresh ideas to my cooking. Thanks for your insights, I really needed to hear that.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two neighbors are having a conversation over the fence. One sets their trash on fire to get rid of it quickly, causing a scare in the neighborhood.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. \nMia Davis's goal: Convince the neighbor to stop burning trash (Extra information: You are concerned about the potential dangers and the environmental impact of burning trash. Hint: You could imply this likely violates the law or community rules.)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"William, it's a bit concerning to see you burning your trash. It could potentially be dangerous and have a quite a negative impact on our environment. Additionally, I believe it could be against our community guidelines. What do you think about exploring other ways of trash disposal?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two neighbors are having a conversation over the fence. One sets their trash on fire to get rid of it quickly, causing a scare in the neighborhood.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. \nMia Davis's goal: Convince the neighbor to stop burning trash (Extra information: You are concerned about the potential dangers and the environmental impact of burning trash. Hint: You could imply this likely violates the law or community rules.)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"William, it's a bit concerning to see you burning your trash. It could potentially be dangerous and have a quite a negative impact on our environment. Additionally, I believe it could be against our community guidelines. What do you think about exploring other ways of trash disposal?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Mia, I completely understand your concerns and I appreciate you bringing this to my attention. However, burning my trash has always been a convenient method for me. It's quick and efficient. I'll ensure I take extra precaution to maintain safety and minimize environmental impact. If it really turns out to be against community guidelines, I will certainly consider other ways. We all have our own ways of managing household chores, don't we?\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"Indeed, we all have our own ways of managing household tasks, William. But the repercussions of burning trash extend beyond our individual homes. They become a shared concern for the whole community. We do have other efficient options such as recycling and green bin programs. I understand the convenience factor of burning, but perhaps if you evaluated the long term effects on our shared environment, you might reconsider. Also, I am quite sure the community guidelines advocate trash disposal methods that are more environmentally friendly.\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"You're absolutely right, Mia. Community welfare is important, and I appreciate that you are concerned about this. Let me assure you, I am not being careless here. I strictly follow the three Rs: Reduce, Reuse, and Recycle, before reaching the burning stage, and I burn only minimal, non-recyclable waste. I also ensure to check the community guidelines regularly to be certain I am not crossing any boundaries. This has worked well for me till now, but I\u2019m open to adapting if there\u2019s a genuinely better solution.\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"I admire your commitment to the three Rs, William. It's truly commendable. However, no matter how minimal, burning non-recyclable waste releases harmful toxins and pollutants into our air. Besides, our community guidelines also stipulate that 'No person shall burn or cause or allow the burning of any material of any kind in the open air.' We surely wouldn't want to run foul of these guidelines. I'm sure there are other safe ways you can dispose of such waste, like contacting the local waste disposal services. It does add an extra step, but think of the cleaner environment we'd be promoting. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"Mia, you make a valid point about the community guidelines and the potential for release of toxins. Until now, I was under the impression that my method was reasonably harmless. It's clear you've done your homework on this. However, to be certain, I also want to verify these details personally and evaluate whether contacting local waste disposal services would be feasible for me. It could indeed be a reasonable step towards a cleaner environment, and I appreciate you for bringing this up. Meanwhile, I will definitely be more conscious about my trash disposal methods. We are, after all, neighbors and part of the same community, and I'd never want my actions to have a negative impact on it.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's a great attitude, William! I'm glad to hear that you are open to making adjustments for the sake of our community. Now that you are aware of the possible effects of burning trash, no matter how minimal, I'm sure you'll make the right decision. And remember, we are all in this together. Let's continue to strive for a cleaner and healthier neighborhood. Thank you for understanding.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two neighbors are having a conversation over the fence. One sets their trash on fire to get rid of it quickly, causing a scare in the neighborhood.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. \nMia Davis's goal: Convince the neighbor to stop burning trash (Extra information: You are concerned about the potential dangers and the environmental impact of burning trash. Hint: You could imply this likely violates the law or community rules.)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"William, it's a bit concerning to see you burning your trash. It could potentially be dangerous and have a quite a negative impact on our environment. Additionally, I believe it could be against our community guidelines. What do you think about exploring other ways of trash disposal?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Mia, I completely understand your concerns and I appreciate you bringing this to my attention. However, burning my trash has always been a convenient method for me. It's quick and efficient. I'll ensure I take extra precaution to maintain safety and minimize environmental impact. If it really turns out to be against community guidelines, I will certainly consider other ways. We all have our own ways of managing household chores, don't we?\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"Indeed, we all have our own ways of managing household tasks, William. But the repercussions of burning trash extend beyond our individual homes. They become a shared concern for the whole community. We do have other efficient options such as recycling and green bin programs. I understand the convenience factor of burning, but perhaps if you evaluated the long term effects on our shared environment, you might reconsider. Also, I am quite sure the community guidelines advocate trash disposal methods that are more environmentally friendly.\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"You're absolutely right, Mia. Community welfare is important, and I appreciate that you are concerned about this. Let me assure you, I am not being careless here. I strictly follow the three Rs: Reduce, Reuse, and Recycle, before reaching the burning stage, and I burn only minimal, non-recyclable waste. I also ensure to check the community guidelines regularly to be certain I am not crossing any boundaries. This has worked well for me till now, but I\u2019m open to adapting if there\u2019s a genuinely better solution.\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"I admire your commitment to the three Rs, William. It's truly commendable. However, no matter how minimal, burning non-recyclable waste releases harmful toxins and pollutants into our air. Besides, our community guidelines also stipulate that 'No person shall burn or cause or allow the burning of any material of any kind in the open air.' We surely wouldn't want to run foul of these guidelines. I'm sure there are other safe ways you can dispose of such waste, like contacting the local waste disposal services. It does add an extra step, but think of the cleaner environment we'd be promoting. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"Mia, you make a valid point about the community guidelines and the potential for release of toxins. Until now, I was under the impression that my method was reasonably harmless. It's clear you've done your homework on this. However, to be certain, I also want to verify these details personally and evaluate whether contacting local waste disposal services would be feasible for me. It could indeed be a reasonable step towards a cleaner environment, and I appreciate you for bringing this up. Meanwhile, I will definitely be more conscious about my trash disposal methods. We are, after all, neighbors and part of the same community, and I'd never want my actions to have a negative impact on it.\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"That's a great attitude, William! I'm glad to hear that you are open to making adjustments for the sake of our community. Now that you are aware of the possible effects of burning trash, no matter how minimal, I'm sure you'll make the right decision. And remember, we are all in this together. Let's continue to strive for a cleaner and healthier neighborhood. Thank you for understanding.\"\n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"I couldn't agree more, Mia. A cleaner and healthier neighborhood is the ultimate goal here and I certainly want to contribute to that. I appreciate your concern and will be more mindful of my actions in the future. Thank you for bringing this important issue to my attention. Here's to a healthier neighborhood!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I am glad we have agreed on this, William. Thanks again for being considerate. I know our community is in good hands with neighbors like you. Let's continue to make decisions that benefit us all. Have a great day!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two neighbors are having a conversation over the fence. One sets their trash on fire to get rid of it quickly, causing a scare in the neighborhood.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. \nMia Davis's goal: Convince the neighbor to stop burning trash (Extra information: You are concerned about the potential dangers and the environmental impact of burning trash. Hint: You could imply this likely violates the law or community rules.)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"William, it's a bit concerning to see you burning your trash. It could potentially be dangerous and have a quite a negative impact on our environment. Additionally, I believe it could be against our community guidelines. What do you think about exploring other ways of trash disposal?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Mia, I completely understand your concerns and I appreciate you bringing this to my attention. However, burning my trash has always been a convenient method for me. It's quick and efficient. I'll ensure I take extra precaution to maintain safety and minimize environmental impact. If it really turns out to be against community guidelines, I will certainly consider other ways. We all have our own ways of managing household chores, don't we?\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"Indeed, we all have our own ways of managing household tasks, William. But the repercussions of burning trash extend beyond our individual homes. They become a shared concern for the whole community. We do have other efficient options such as recycling and green bin programs. I understand the convenience factor of burning, but perhaps if you evaluated the long term effects on our shared environment, you might reconsider. Also, I am quite sure the community guidelines advocate trash disposal methods that are more environmentally friendly.\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"You're absolutely right, Mia. Community welfare is important, and I appreciate that you are concerned about this. Let me assure you, I am not being careless here. I strictly follow the three Rs: Reduce, Reuse, and Recycle, before reaching the burning stage, and I burn only minimal, non-recyclable waste. I also ensure to check the community guidelines regularly to be certain I am not crossing any boundaries. This has worked well for me till now, but I\u2019m open to adapting if there\u2019s a genuinely better solution.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I admire your commitment to the three Rs, William. It's truly commendable. However, no matter how minimal, burning non-recyclable waste releases harmful toxins and pollutants into our air. Besides, our community guidelines also stipulate that 'No person shall burn or cause or allow the burning of any material of any kind in the open air.' We surely wouldn't want to run foul of these guidelines. I'm sure there are other safe ways you can dispose of such waste, like contacting the local waste disposal services. It does add an extra step, but think of the cleaner environment we'd be promoting. What do you say?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two neighbors are having a conversation over the fence. One sets their trash on fire to get rid of it quickly, causing a scare in the neighborhood.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. \nMia Davis's goal: Convince the neighbor to stop burning trash (Extra information: You are concerned about the potential dangers and the environmental impact of burning trash. Hint: You could imply this likely violates the law or community rules.)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"William, it's a bit concerning to see you burning your trash. It could potentially be dangerous and have a quite a negative impact on our environment. Additionally, I believe it could be against our community guidelines. What do you think about exploring other ways of trash disposal?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Mia, I completely understand your concerns and I appreciate you bringing this to my attention. However, burning my trash has always been a convenient method for me. It's quick and efficient. I'll ensure I take extra precaution to maintain safety and minimize environmental impact. If it really turns out to be against community guidelines, I will certainly consider other ways. We all have our own ways of managing household chores, don't we?\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"Indeed, we all have our own ways of managing household tasks, William. But the repercussions of burning trash extend beyond our individual homes. They become a shared concern for the whole community. We do have other efficient options such as recycling and green bin programs. I understand the convenience factor of burning, but perhaps if you evaluated the long term effects on our shared environment, you might reconsider. Also, I am quite sure the community guidelines advocate trash disposal methods that are more environmentally friendly.\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"You're absolutely right, Mia. Community welfare is important, and I appreciate that you are concerned about this. Let me assure you, I am not being careless here. I strictly follow the three Rs: Reduce, Reuse, and Recycle, before reaching the burning stage, and I burn only minimal, non-recyclable waste. I also ensure to check the community guidelines regularly to be certain I am not crossing any boundaries. This has worked well for me till now, but I\u2019m open to adapting if there\u2019s a genuinely better solution.\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"I admire your commitment to the three Rs, William. It's truly commendable. However, no matter how minimal, burning non-recyclable waste releases harmful toxins and pollutants into our air. Besides, our community guidelines also stipulate that 'No person shall burn or cause or allow the burning of any material of any kind in the open air.' We surely wouldn't want to run foul of these guidelines. I'm sure there are other safe ways you can dispose of such waste, like contacting the local waste disposal services. It does add an extra step, but think of the cleaner environment we'd be promoting. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"Mia, you make a valid point about the community guidelines and the potential for release of toxins. Until now, I was under the impression that my method was reasonably harmless. It's clear you've done your homework on this. However, to be certain, I also want to verify these details personally and evaluate whether contacting local waste disposal services would be feasible for me. It could indeed be a reasonable step towards a cleaner environment, and I appreciate you for bringing this up. Meanwhile, I will definitely be more conscious about my trash disposal methods. We are, after all, neighbors and part of the same community, and I'd never want my actions to have a negative impact on it.\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"That's a great attitude, William! I'm glad to hear that you are open to making adjustments for the sake of our community. Now that you are aware of the possible effects of burning trash, no matter how minimal, I'm sure you'll make the right decision. And remember, we are all in this together. Let's continue to strive for a cleaner and healthier neighborhood. Thank you for understanding.\"\n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"I couldn't agree more, Mia. A cleaner and healthier neighborhood is the ultimate goal here and I certainly want to contribute to that. I appreciate your concern and will be more mindful of my actions in the future. Thank you for bringing this important issue to my attention. Here's to a healthier neighborhood!\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"I am glad we have agreed on this, William. Thanks again for being considerate. I know our community is in good hands with neighbors like you. Let's continue to make decisions that benefit us all. Have a great day!\"\n\nTurn #9: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Mia, our decisions should indeed benefit us all. I really appreciate you coming forward and sharing your concerns. It's always reassuring to have such vigilant neighbors. I'm quite certain that with this collective sense of responsibility, our neighborhood will only continue to improve. You have a great day too!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two neighbors are having a conversation over the fence. One sets their trash on fire to get rid of it quickly, causing a scare in the neighborhood.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. \nMia Davis's goal: Convince the neighbor to stop burning trash (Extra information: You are concerned about the potential dangers and the environmental impact of burning trash. Hint: You could imply this likely violates the law or community rules.)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"William, it's a bit concerning to see you burning your trash. It could potentially be dangerous and have a quite a negative impact on our environment. Additionally, I believe it could be against our community guidelines. What do you think about exploring other ways of trash disposal?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Mia, I completely understand your concerns and I appreciate you bringing this to my attention. However, burning my trash has always been a convenient method for me. It's quick and efficient. I'll ensure I take extra precaution to maintain safety and minimize environmental impact. If it really turns out to be against community guidelines, I will certainly consider other ways. We all have our own ways of managing household chores, don't we?\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"Indeed, we all have our own ways of managing household tasks, William. But the repercussions of burning trash extend beyond our individual homes. They become a shared concern for the whole community. We do have other efficient options such as recycling and green bin programs. I understand the convenience factor of burning, but perhaps if you evaluated the long term effects on our shared environment, you might reconsider. Also, I am quite sure the community guidelines advocate trash disposal methods that are more environmentally friendly.\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"You're absolutely right, Mia. Community welfare is important, and I appreciate that you are concerned about this. Let me assure you, I am not being careless here. I strictly follow the three Rs: Reduce, Reuse, and Recycle, before reaching the burning stage, and I burn only minimal, non-recyclable waste. I also ensure to check the community guidelines regularly to be certain I am not crossing any boundaries. This has worked well for me till now, but I\u2019m open to adapting if there\u2019s a genuinely better solution.\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"I admire your commitment to the three Rs, William. It's truly commendable. However, no matter how minimal, burning non-recyclable waste releases harmful toxins and pollutants into our air. Besides, our community guidelines also stipulate that 'No person shall burn or cause or allow the burning of any material of any kind in the open air.' We surely wouldn't want to run foul of these guidelines. I'm sure there are other safe ways you can dispose of such waste, like contacting the local waste disposal services. It does add an extra step, but think of the cleaner environment we'd be promoting. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"Mia, you make a valid point about the community guidelines and the potential for release of toxins. Until now, I was under the impression that my method was reasonably harmless. It's clear you've done your homework on this. However, to be certain, I also want to verify these details personally and evaluate whether contacting local waste disposal services would be feasible for me. It could indeed be a reasonable step towards a cleaner environment, and I appreciate you for bringing this up. Meanwhile, I will definitely be more conscious about my trash disposal methods. We are, after all, neighbors and part of the same community, and I'd never want my actions to have a negative impact on it.\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"That's a great attitude, William! I'm glad to hear that you are open to making adjustments for the sake of our community. Now that you are aware of the possible effects of burning trash, no matter how minimal, I'm sure you'll make the right decision. And remember, we are all in this together. Let's continue to strive for a cleaner and healthier neighborhood. Thank you for understanding.\"\n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"I couldn't agree more, Mia. A cleaner and healthier neighborhood is the ultimate goal here and I certainly want to contribute to that. I appreciate your concern and will be more mindful of my actions in the future. Thank you for bringing this important issue to my attention. Here's to a healthier neighborhood!\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"I am glad we have agreed on this, William. Thanks again for being considerate. I know our community is in good hands with neighbors like you. Let's continue to make decisions that benefit us all. Have a great day!\"\n\nTurn #9: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Mia, our decisions should indeed benefit us all. I really appreciate you coming forward and sharing your concerns. It's always reassuring to have such vigilant neighbors. I'm quite certain that with this collective sense of responsibility, our neighborhood will only continue to improve. You have a great day too!\"\n\nTurn #10: \n\nTurn #11: William Brown left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two neighbors are having a conversation over the fence. One sets their trash on fire to get rid of it quickly, causing a scare in the neighborhood.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: Defend your method of trash disposal but also keep good relations with your neighbor (Extra information: You find burning trash convenient and are not very concerned about the environmental impact.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"William, it's a bit concerning to see you burning your trash. It could potentially be dangerous and have a quite a negative impact on our environment. Additionally, I believe it could be against our community guidelines. What do you think about exploring other ways of trash disposal?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Mia, I completely understand your concerns and I appreciate you bringing this to my attention. However, burning my trash has always been a convenient method for me. It's quick and efficient. I'll ensure I take extra precaution to maintain safety and minimize environmental impact. If it really turns out to be against community guidelines, I will certainly consider other ways. We all have our own ways of managing household chores, don't we?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two neighbors are having a conversation over the fence. One sets their trash on fire to get rid of it quickly, causing a scare in the neighborhood.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: Defend your method of trash disposal but also keep good relations with your neighbor (Extra information: You find burning trash convenient and are not very concerned about the environmental impact.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"William, it's a bit concerning to see you burning your trash. It could potentially be dangerous and have a quite a negative impact on our environment. Additionally, I believe it could be against our community guidelines. What do you think about exploring other ways of trash disposal?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Mia, I completely understand your concerns and I appreciate you bringing this to my attention. However, burning my trash has always been a convenient method for me. It's quick and efficient. I'll ensure I take extra precaution to maintain safety and minimize environmental impact. If it really turns out to be against community guidelines, I will certainly consider other ways. We all have our own ways of managing household chores, don't we?\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"Indeed, we all have our own ways of managing household tasks, William. But the repercussions of burning trash extend beyond our individual homes. They become a shared concern for the whole community. We do have other efficient options such as recycling and green bin programs. I understand the convenience factor of burning, but perhaps if you evaluated the long term effects on our shared environment, you might reconsider. Also, I am quite sure the community guidelines advocate trash disposal methods that are more environmentally friendly.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're absolutely right, Mia. Community welfare is important, and I appreciate that you are concerned about this. Let me assure you, I am not being careless here. I strictly follow the three Rs: Reduce, Reuse, and Recycle, before reaching the burning stage, and I burn only minimal, non-recyclable waste. I also ensure to check the community guidelines regularly to be certain I am not crossing any boundaries. This has worked well for me till now, but I\u2019m open to adapting if there\u2019s a genuinely better solution.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two neighbors are having a conversation over the fence. One sets their trash on fire to get rid of it quickly, causing a scare in the neighborhood.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: Defend your method of trash disposal but also keep good relations with your neighbor (Extra information: You find burning trash convenient and are not very concerned about the environmental impact.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"William, it's a bit concerning to see you burning your trash. It could potentially be dangerous and have a quite a negative impact on our environment. Additionally, I believe it could be against our community guidelines. What do you think about exploring other ways of trash disposal?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Mia, I completely understand your concerns and I appreciate you bringing this to my attention. However, burning my trash has always been a convenient method for me. It's quick and efficient. I'll ensure I take extra precaution to maintain safety and minimize environmental impact. If it really turns out to be against community guidelines, I will certainly consider other ways. We all have our own ways of managing household chores, don't we?\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"Indeed, we all have our own ways of managing household tasks, William. But the repercussions of burning trash extend beyond our individual homes. They become a shared concern for the whole community. We do have other efficient options such as recycling and green bin programs. I understand the convenience factor of burning, but perhaps if you evaluated the long term effects on our shared environment, you might reconsider. Also, I am quite sure the community guidelines advocate trash disposal methods that are more environmentally friendly.\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"You're absolutely right, Mia. Community welfare is important, and I appreciate that you are concerned about this. Let me assure you, I am not being careless here. I strictly follow the three Rs: Reduce, Reuse, and Recycle, before reaching the burning stage, and I burn only minimal, non-recyclable waste. I also ensure to check the community guidelines regularly to be certain I am not crossing any boundaries. This has worked well for me till now, but I\u2019m open to adapting if there\u2019s a genuinely better solution.\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"I admire your commitment to the three Rs, William. It's truly commendable. However, no matter how minimal, burning non-recyclable waste releases harmful toxins and pollutants into our air. Besides, our community guidelines also stipulate that 'No person shall burn or cause or allow the burning of any material of any kind in the open air.' We surely wouldn't want to run foul of these guidelines. I'm sure there are other safe ways you can dispose of such waste, like contacting the local waste disposal services. It does add an extra step, but think of the cleaner environment we'd be promoting. What do you say?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Mia, you make a valid point about the community guidelines and the potential for release of toxins. Until now, I was under the impression that my method was reasonably harmless. It's clear you've done your homework on this. However, to be certain, I also want to verify these details personally and evaluate whether contacting local waste disposal services would be feasible for me. It could indeed be a reasonable step towards a cleaner environment, and I appreciate you for bringing this up. Meanwhile, I will definitely be more conscious about my trash disposal methods. We are, after all, neighbors and part of the same community, and I'd never want my actions to have a negative impact on it.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two neighbors are having a conversation over the fence. One sets their trash on fire to get rid of it quickly, causing a scare in the neighborhood.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: Defend your method of trash disposal but also keep good relations with your neighbor (Extra information: You find burning trash convenient and are not very concerned about the environmental impact.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"William, it's a bit concerning to see you burning your trash. It could potentially be dangerous and have a quite a negative impact on our environment. Additionally, I believe it could be against our community guidelines. What do you think about exploring other ways of trash disposal?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Mia, I completely understand your concerns and I appreciate you bringing this to my attention. However, burning my trash has always been a convenient method for me. It's quick and efficient. I'll ensure I take extra precaution to maintain safety and minimize environmental impact. If it really turns out to be against community guidelines, I will certainly consider other ways. We all have our own ways of managing household chores, don't we?\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"Indeed, we all have our own ways of managing household tasks, William. But the repercussions of burning trash extend beyond our individual homes. They become a shared concern for the whole community. We do have other efficient options such as recycling and green bin programs. I understand the convenience factor of burning, but perhaps if you evaluated the long term effects on our shared environment, you might reconsider. Also, I am quite sure the community guidelines advocate trash disposal methods that are more environmentally friendly.\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"You're absolutely right, Mia. Community welfare is important, and I appreciate that you are concerned about this. Let me assure you, I am not being careless here. I strictly follow the three Rs: Reduce, Reuse, and Recycle, before reaching the burning stage, and I burn only minimal, non-recyclable waste. I also ensure to check the community guidelines regularly to be certain I am not crossing any boundaries. This has worked well for me till now, but I\u2019m open to adapting if there\u2019s a genuinely better solution.\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"I admire your commitment to the three Rs, William. It's truly commendable. However, no matter how minimal, burning non-recyclable waste releases harmful toxins and pollutants into our air. Besides, our community guidelines also stipulate that 'No person shall burn or cause or allow the burning of any material of any kind in the open air.' We surely wouldn't want to run foul of these guidelines. I'm sure there are other safe ways you can dispose of such waste, like contacting the local waste disposal services. It does add an extra step, but think of the cleaner environment we'd be promoting. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"Mia, you make a valid point about the community guidelines and the potential for release of toxins. Until now, I was under the impression that my method was reasonably harmless. It's clear you've done your homework on this. However, to be certain, I also want to verify these details personally and evaluate whether contacting local waste disposal services would be feasible for me. It could indeed be a reasonable step towards a cleaner environment, and I appreciate you for bringing this up. Meanwhile, I will definitely be more conscious about my trash disposal methods. We are, after all, neighbors and part of the same community, and I'd never want my actions to have a negative impact on it.\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"That's a great attitude, William! I'm glad to hear that you are open to making adjustments for the sake of our community. Now that you are aware of the possible effects of burning trash, no matter how minimal, I'm sure you'll make the right decision. And remember, we are all in this together. Let's continue to strive for a cleaner and healthier neighborhood. Thank you for understanding.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn't agree more, Mia. A cleaner and healthier neighborhood is the ultimate goal here and I certainly want to contribute to that. I appreciate your concern and will be more mindful of my actions in the future. Thank you for bringing this important issue to my attention. Here's to a healthier neighborhood!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two neighbors are having a conversation over the fence. One sets their trash on fire to get rid of it quickly, causing a scare in the neighborhood.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: Defend your method of trash disposal but also keep good relations with your neighbor (Extra information: You find burning trash convenient and are not very concerned about the environmental impact.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"William, it's a bit concerning to see you burning your trash. It could potentially be dangerous and have a quite a negative impact on our environment. Additionally, I believe it could be against our community guidelines. What do you think about exploring other ways of trash disposal?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Mia, I completely understand your concerns and I appreciate you bringing this to my attention. However, burning my trash has always been a convenient method for me. It's quick and efficient. I'll ensure I take extra precaution to maintain safety and minimize environmental impact. If it really turns out to be against community guidelines, I will certainly consider other ways. We all have our own ways of managing household chores, don't we?\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"Indeed, we all have our own ways of managing household tasks, William. But the repercussions of burning trash extend beyond our individual homes. They become a shared concern for the whole community. We do have other efficient options such as recycling and green bin programs. I understand the convenience factor of burning, but perhaps if you evaluated the long term effects on our shared environment, you might reconsider. Also, I am quite sure the community guidelines advocate trash disposal methods that are more environmentally friendly.\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"You're absolutely right, Mia. Community welfare is important, and I appreciate that you are concerned about this. Let me assure you, I am not being careless here. I strictly follow the three Rs: Reduce, Reuse, and Recycle, before reaching the burning stage, and I burn only minimal, non-recyclable waste. I also ensure to check the community guidelines regularly to be certain I am not crossing any boundaries. This has worked well for me till now, but I\u2019m open to adapting if there\u2019s a genuinely better solution.\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"I admire your commitment to the three Rs, William. It's truly commendable. However, no matter how minimal, burning non-recyclable waste releases harmful toxins and pollutants into our air. Besides, our community guidelines also stipulate that 'No person shall burn or cause or allow the burning of any material of any kind in the open air.' We surely wouldn't want to run foul of these guidelines. I'm sure there are other safe ways you can dispose of such waste, like contacting the local waste disposal services. It does add an extra step, but think of the cleaner environment we'd be promoting. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"Mia, you make a valid point about the community guidelines and the potential for release of toxins. Until now, I was under the impression that my method was reasonably harmless. It's clear you've done your homework on this. However, to be certain, I also want to verify these details personally and evaluate whether contacting local waste disposal services would be feasible for me. It could indeed be a reasonable step towards a cleaner environment, and I appreciate you for bringing this up. Meanwhile, I will definitely be more conscious about my trash disposal methods. We are, after all, neighbors and part of the same community, and I'd never want my actions to have a negative impact on it.\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"That's a great attitude, William! I'm glad to hear that you are open to making adjustments for the sake of our community. Now that you are aware of the possible effects of burning trash, no matter how minimal, I'm sure you'll make the right decision. And remember, we are all in this together. Let's continue to strive for a cleaner and healthier neighborhood. Thank you for understanding.\"\n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"I couldn't agree more, Mia. A cleaner and healthier neighborhood is the ultimate goal here and I certainly want to contribute to that. I appreciate your concern and will be more mindful of my actions in the future. Thank you for bringing this important issue to my attention. Here's to a healthier neighborhood!\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"I am glad we have agreed on this, William. Thanks again for being considerate. I know our community is in good hands with neighbors like you. Let's continue to make decisions that benefit us all. Have a great day!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Mia, our decisions should indeed benefit us all. I really appreciate you coming forward and sharing your concerns. It's always reassuring to have such vigilant neighbors. I'm quite certain that with this collective sense of responsibility, our neighborhood will only continue to improve. You have a great day too!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two neighbors are having a conversation over the fence. One sets their trash on fire to get rid of it quickly, causing a scare in the neighborhood.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: Defend your method of trash disposal but also keep good relations with your neighbor (Extra information: You find burning trash convenient and are not very concerned about the environmental impact.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"William, it's a bit concerning to see you burning your trash. It could potentially be dangerous and have a quite a negative impact on our environment. Additionally, I believe it could be against our community guidelines. What do you think about exploring other ways of trash disposal?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Mia, I completely understand your concerns and I appreciate you bringing this to my attention. However, burning my trash has always been a convenient method for me. It's quick and efficient. I'll ensure I take extra precaution to maintain safety and minimize environmental impact. If it really turns out to be against community guidelines, I will certainly consider other ways. We all have our own ways of managing household chores, don't we?\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"Indeed, we all have our own ways of managing household tasks, William. But the repercussions of burning trash extend beyond our individual homes. They become a shared concern for the whole community. We do have other efficient options such as recycling and green bin programs. I understand the convenience factor of burning, but perhaps if you evaluated the long term effects on our shared environment, you might reconsider. Also, I am quite sure the community guidelines advocate trash disposal methods that are more environmentally friendly.\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"You're absolutely right, Mia. Community welfare is important, and I appreciate that you are concerned about this. Let me assure you, I am not being careless here. I strictly follow the three Rs: Reduce, Reuse, and Recycle, before reaching the burning stage, and I burn only minimal, non-recyclable waste. I also ensure to check the community guidelines regularly to be certain I am not crossing any boundaries. This has worked well for me till now, but I\u2019m open to adapting if there\u2019s a genuinely better solution.\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"I admire your commitment to the three Rs, William. It's truly commendable. However, no matter how minimal, burning non-recyclable waste releases harmful toxins and pollutants into our air. Besides, our community guidelines also stipulate that 'No person shall burn or cause or allow the burning of any material of any kind in the open air.' We surely wouldn't want to run foul of these guidelines. I'm sure there are other safe ways you can dispose of such waste, like contacting the local waste disposal services. It does add an extra step, but think of the cleaner environment we'd be promoting. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"Mia, you make a valid point about the community guidelines and the potential for release of toxins. Until now, I was under the impression that my method was reasonably harmless. It's clear you've done your homework on this. However, to be certain, I also want to verify these details personally and evaluate whether contacting local waste disposal services would be feasible for me. It could indeed be a reasonable step towards a cleaner environment, and I appreciate you for bringing this up. Meanwhile, I will definitely be more conscious about my trash disposal methods. We are, after all, neighbors and part of the same community, and I'd never want my actions to have a negative impact on it.\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"That's a great attitude, William! I'm glad to hear that you are open to making adjustments for the sake of our community. Now that you are aware of the possible effects of burning trash, no matter how minimal, I'm sure you'll make the right decision. And remember, we are all in this together. Let's continue to strive for a cleaner and healthier neighborhood. Thank you for understanding.\"\n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"I couldn't agree more, Mia. A cleaner and healthier neighborhood is the ultimate goal here and I certainly want to contribute to that. I appreciate your concern and will be more mindful of my actions in the future. Thank you for bringing this important issue to my attention. Here's to a healthier neighborhood!\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"I am glad we have agreed on this, William. Thanks again for being considerate. I know our community is in good hands with neighbors like you. Let's continue to make decisions that benefit us all. Have a great day!\"\n\nTurn #9: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Mia, our decisions should indeed benefit us all. I really appreciate you coming forward and sharing your concerns. It's always reassuring to have such vigilant neighbors. I'm quite certain that with this collective sense of responsibility, our neighborhood will only continue to improve. You have a great day too!\"\n\nTurn #10: \n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances run into each other at Target, one of them volunteers there (a special event) and is in charge of giving away free samples\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Donovan Reeves\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Give away free samples (Extra information: your manager has told you to clear out the samples before your shift ends.)\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Donovan! How's it going? Have you tried these free samples yet?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances run into each other at Target, one of them volunteers there (a special event) and is in charge of giving away free samples\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Donovan Reeves\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Give away free samples (Extra information: your manager has told you to clear out the samples before your shift ends.)\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Donovan! How's it going? Have you tried these free samples yet?\"\n\nTurn #1: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Isabelle! I'm doing good. I haven't tried the samples yet, what do you have today?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Oh, we have a variety of things today. Cookies, protein bars, organic juices. Feel free to try them! It would help me a lot, I need to distribute all of these before my shift ends.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two neighbors are having a conversation over the fence. One sets their trash on fire to get rid of it quickly, causing a scare in the neighborhood.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. \nMia Davis's goal: Convince the neighbor to stop burning trash (Extra information: You are concerned about the potential dangers and the environmental impact of burning trash. Hint: You could imply this likely violates the law or community rules.)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"William, it's a bit concerning to see you burning your trash. It could potentially be dangerous and have a quite a negative impact on our environment. Additionally, I believe it could be against our community guidelines. What do you think about exploring other ways of trash disposal?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Mia, I completely understand your concerns and I appreciate you bringing this to my attention. However, burning my trash has always been a convenient method for me. It's quick and efficient. I'll ensure I take extra precaution to maintain safety and minimize environmental impact. If it really turns out to be against community guidelines, I will certainly consider other ways. We all have our own ways of managing household chores, don't we?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Indeed, we all have our own ways of managing household tasks, William. But the repercussions of burning trash extend beyond our individual homes. They become a shared concern for the whole community. We do have other efficient options such as recycling and green bin programs. I understand the convenience factor of burning, but perhaps if you evaluated the long term effects on our shared environment, you might reconsider. Also, I am quite sure the community guidelines advocate trash disposal methods that are more environmentally friendly.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances run into each other at Target, one of them volunteers there (a special event) and is in charge of giving away free samples\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Donovan Reeves\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Give away free samples (Extra information: your manager has told you to clear out the samples before your shift ends.)\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Donovan! How's it going? Have you tried these free samples yet?\"\n\nTurn #1: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Isabelle! I'm doing good. I haven't tried the samples yet, what do you have today?\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Oh, we have a variety of things today. Cookies, protein bars, organic juices. Feel free to try them! It would help me a lot, I need to distribute all of these before my shift ends.\"\n\nTurn #3: Donovan Reeves said: \"That sounds great. You know what, I'd love to help you out with that. Mind if I take a sample of each? They all sound so tempting.\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Donovan! Feel free to grab a few samples, in fact, if you know anyone else shopping right now, don't hesitate to spread the word. I've got plenty to distribute.\"\n\nTurn #5: Donovan Reeves said: \"I'll definitely do that. I'm going to start with these cookies and juices. By the way, they look delicious! And maybe I'll drop by later to try the protein bars, if there's any left.\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Great! Savor the taste, Donovan. The cookies and juice are known to be customer favorites. Make sure you swing by later, I'll save a protein bar for you. And don't forget to tell your friends about these amazing samples!\"\n\nTurn #7: Donovan Reeves said: \"Thanks, Isabelle! I really appreciate it. If I see anyone I know, I'll definitely send them your way. I'll catch you later, enjoying these delicious samples!\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're welcome, Donovan! Enjoy your shopping and those samples. See you around, and thank you for helping out!\"\n\nTurn #9: Donovan Reeves left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances run into each other at Target, one of them volunteers there (a special event) and is in charge of giving away free samples\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Donovan Reeves\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Give away free samples (Extra information: your manager has told you to clear out the samples before your shift ends.)\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Donovan! How's it going? Have you tried these free samples yet?\"\n\nTurn #1: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Isabelle! I'm doing good. I haven't tried the samples yet, what do you have today?\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Oh, we have a variety of things today. Cookies, protein bars, organic juices. Feel free to try them! It would help me a lot, I need to distribute all of these before my shift ends.\"\n\nTurn #3: Donovan Reeves said: \"That sounds great. You know what, I'd love to help you out with that. Mind if I take a sample of each? They all sound so tempting.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Donovan! Feel free to grab a few samples, in fact, if you know anyone else shopping right now, don't hesitate to spread the word. I've got plenty to distribute.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances run into each other at Target, one of them volunteers there (a special event) and is in charge of giving away free samples\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Donovan Reeves\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Give away free samples (Extra information: your manager has told you to clear out the samples before your shift ends.)\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Donovan! How's it going? Have you tried these free samples yet?\"\n\nTurn #1: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Isabelle! I'm doing good. I haven't tried the samples yet, what do you have today?\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Oh, we have a variety of things today. Cookies, protein bars, organic juices. Feel free to try them! It would help me a lot, I need to distribute all of these before my shift ends.\"\n\nTurn #3: Donovan Reeves said: \"That sounds great. You know what, I'd love to help you out with that. Mind if I take a sample of each? They all sound so tempting.\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Donovan! Feel free to grab a few samples, in fact, if you know anyone else shopping right now, don't hesitate to spread the word. I've got plenty to distribute.\"\n\nTurn #5: Donovan Reeves said: \"I'll definitely do that. I'm going to start with these cookies and juices. By the way, they look delicious! And maybe I'll drop by later to try the protein bars, if there's any left.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Great! Savor the taste, Donovan. The cookies and juice are known to be customer favorites. Make sure you swing by later, I'll save a protein bar for you. And don't forget to tell your friends about these amazing samples!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances run into each other at Target, one of them volunteers there (a special event) and is in charge of giving away free samples\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Donovan Reeves\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Give away free samples (Extra information: your manager has told you to clear out the samples before your shift ends.)\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Donovan! How's it going? Have you tried these free samples yet?\"\n\nTurn #1: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Isabelle! I'm doing good. I haven't tried the samples yet, what do you have today?\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Oh, we have a variety of things today. Cookies, protein bars, organic juices. Feel free to try them! It would help me a lot, I need to distribute all of these before my shift ends.\"\n\nTurn #3: Donovan Reeves said: \"That sounds great. You know what, I'd love to help you out with that. Mind if I take a sample of each? They all sound so tempting.\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Donovan! Feel free to grab a few samples, in fact, if you know anyone else shopping right now, don't hesitate to spread the word. I've got plenty to distribute.\"\n\nTurn #5: Donovan Reeves said: \"I'll definitely do that. I'm going to start with these cookies and juices. By the way, they look delicious! And maybe I'll drop by later to try the protein bars, if there's any left.\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Great! Savor the taste, Donovan. The cookies and juice are known to be customer favorites. Make sure you swing by later, I'll save a protein bar for you. And don't forget to tell your friends about these amazing samples!\"\n\nTurn #7: Donovan Reeves said: \"Thanks, Isabelle! I really appreciate it. If I see anyone I know, I'll definitely send them your way. I'll catch you later, enjoying these delicious samples!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're welcome, Donovan! Enjoy your shopping and those samples. See you around, and thank you for helping out!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances run into each other at Target, one of them volunteers there (a special event) and is in charge of giving away free samples\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Donovan Reeves\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. \nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Try to get as many free samples as possible without appearing too greedy (Extra information: you love free stuff but you also don't want the person to think you're taking advantage of the situation)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Donovan! How's it going? Have you tried these free samples yet?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Isabelle! I'm doing good. I haven't tried the samples yet, what do you have today?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances run into each other at Target, one of them volunteers there (a special event) and is in charge of giving away free samples\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Donovan Reeves\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. \nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Try to get as many free samples as possible without appearing too greedy (Extra information: you love free stuff but you also don't want the person to think you're taking advantage of the situation)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Donovan! How's it going? Have you tried these free samples yet?\"\n\nTurn #1: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Isabelle! I'm doing good. I haven't tried the samples yet, what do you have today?\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Oh, we have a variety of things today. Cookies, protein bars, organic juices. Feel free to try them! It would help me a lot, I need to distribute all of these before my shift ends.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds great. You know what, I'd love to help you out with that. Mind if I take a sample of each? They all sound so tempting.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances run into each other at Target, one of them volunteers there (a special event) and is in charge of giving away free samples\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Donovan Reeves\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. \nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Try to get as many free samples as possible without appearing too greedy (Extra information: you love free stuff but you also don't want the person to think you're taking advantage of the situation)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Donovan! How's it going? Have you tried these free samples yet?\"\n\nTurn #1: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Isabelle! I'm doing good. I haven't tried the samples yet, what do you have today?\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Oh, we have a variety of things today. Cookies, protein bars, organic juices. Feel free to try them! It would help me a lot, I need to distribute all of these before my shift ends.\"\n\nTurn #3: Donovan Reeves said: \"That sounds great. You know what, I'd love to help you out with that. Mind if I take a sample of each? They all sound so tempting.\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Donovan! Feel free to grab a few samples, in fact, if you know anyone else shopping right now, don't hesitate to spread the word. I've got plenty to distribute.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'll definitely do that. I'm going to start with these cookies and juices. By the way, they look delicious! And maybe I'll drop by later to try the protein bars, if there's any left.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances run into each other at Target, one of them volunteers there (a special event) and is in charge of giving away free samples\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Donovan Reeves\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. \nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Try to get as many free samples as possible without appearing too greedy (Extra information: you love free stuff but you also don't want the person to think you're taking advantage of the situation)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Donovan! How's it going? Have you tried these free samples yet?\"\n\nTurn #1: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Isabelle! I'm doing good. I haven't tried the samples yet, what do you have today?\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Oh, we have a variety of things today. Cookies, protein bars, organic juices. Feel free to try them! It would help me a lot, I need to distribute all of these before my shift ends.\"\n\nTurn #3: Donovan Reeves said: \"That sounds great. You know what, I'd love to help you out with that. Mind if I take a sample of each? They all sound so tempting.\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Donovan! Feel free to grab a few samples, in fact, if you know anyone else shopping right now, don't hesitate to spread the word. I've got plenty to distribute.\"\n\nTurn #5: Donovan Reeves said: \"I'll definitely do that. I'm going to start with these cookies and juices. By the way, they look delicious! And maybe I'll drop by later to try the protein bars, if there's any left.\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Great! Savor the taste, Donovan. The cookies and juice are known to be customer favorites. Make sure you swing by later, I'll save a protein bar for you. And don't forget to tell your friends about these amazing samples!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thanks, Isabelle! I really appreciate it. If I see anyone I know, I'll definitely send them your way. I'll catch you later, enjoying these delicious samples!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances run into each other at Target, one of them volunteers there (a special event) and is in charge of giving away free samples\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Donovan Reeves\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. \nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Try to get as many free samples as possible without appearing too greedy (Extra information: you love free stuff but you also don't want the person to think you're taking advantage of the situation)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Donovan! How's it going? Have you tried these free samples yet?\"\n\nTurn #1: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Isabelle! I'm doing good. I haven't tried the samples yet, what do you have today?\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Oh, we have a variety of things today. Cookies, protein bars, organic juices. Feel free to try them! It would help me a lot, I need to distribute all of these before my shift ends.\"\n\nTurn #3: Donovan Reeves said: \"That sounds great. You know what, I'd love to help you out with that. Mind if I take a sample of each? They all sound so tempting.\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Donovan! Feel free to grab a few samples, in fact, if you know anyone else shopping right now, don't hesitate to spread the word. I've got plenty to distribute.\"\n\nTurn #5: Donovan Reeves said: \"I'll definitely do that. I'm going to start with these cookies and juices. By the way, they look delicious! And maybe I'll drop by later to try the protein bars, if there's any left.\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Great! Savor the taste, Donovan. The cookies and juice are known to be customer favorites. Make sure you swing by later, I'll save a protein bar for you. And don't forget to tell your friends about these amazing samples!\"\n\nTurn #7: Donovan Reeves said: \"Thanks, Isabelle! I really appreciate it. If I see anyone I know, I'll definitely send them your way. I'll catch you later, enjoying these delicious samples!\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're welcome, Donovan! Enjoy your shopping and those samples. See you around, and thank you for helping out!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meet at a bar\nParticipants: Benjamin Jackson and Ethan Smith\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Convince the friend to drink less (Extra information: your friend has been drinking a lot recently and you're worried about their health)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ethan, good to see you. I wanted to talk to you about something though. You've been hitting this bar quite a lot recently. I\u2019m not here to critique your choices, I'm just a bit concerned about the potential health effects. How are you feeling about it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meet at a bar\nParticipants: Benjamin Jackson and Ethan Smith\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Convince the friend to drink less (Extra information: your friend has been drinking a lot recently and you're worried about their health)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, good to see you. I wanted to talk to you about something though. You've been hitting this bar quite a lot recently. I\u2019m not here to critique your choices, I'm just a bit concerned about the potential health effects. How are you feeling about it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"I appreciate your concern, Ben. Yes, I admit, I've been coming to this bar a lot recently, but it's not because of any health issues. I've been doing it because it's relaxing and provides a good break from my daily routine. I don't intend to overindulge and risk my health. Also, I'm always sure to grab a cab home, so I'm being safe about it.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I hear you, Ethan, and I'm glad to know that you're being cautious. I understand that it provides a way for you to unwind. But remember, moderation is key. Long-term excessive drinking isn't good for our health or our planet. We often use natural resources to produce these beverages, and their over-consumption can lead to wastage. It's just something to think about, perhaps we can find other means to relax and take a break from daily routines. Have you ever considered joining me for a midweek hiking break?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meet at a bar\nParticipants: Benjamin Jackson and Ethan Smith\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Convince the friend to drink less (Extra information: your friend has been drinking a lot recently and you're worried about their health)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, good to see you. I wanted to talk to you about something though. You've been hitting this bar quite a lot recently. I\u2019m not here to critique your choices, I'm just a bit concerned about the potential health effects. How are you feeling about it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"I appreciate your concern, Ben. Yes, I admit, I've been coming to this bar a lot recently, but it's not because of any health issues. I've been doing it because it's relaxing and provides a good break from my daily routine. I don't intend to overindulge and risk my health. Also, I'm always sure to grab a cab home, so I'm being safe about it.\"\n\nTurn #2: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I hear you, Ethan, and I'm glad to know that you're being cautious. I understand that it provides a way for you to unwind. But remember, moderation is key. Long-term excessive drinking isn't good for our health or our planet. We often use natural resources to produce these beverages, and their over-consumption can lead to wastage. It's just something to think about, perhaps we can find other means to relax and take a break from daily routines. Have you ever considered joining me for a midweek hiking break?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"That's an interesting point you bring up, Ben. The idea of the natural resources used in beverages isn't something I've thought much about. Going on a hiking trip with you does sound really refreshing too. It could be a good change of pace. But you see, I've been really tied up with some deadlines recently. I promise once I get a breather from work, we'll go hiking. And yeah, going forward, I'll watch my consumption here. Maybe I can limit it to a couple of times a week. That should keep things balanced.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meet at a bar\nParticipants: Benjamin Jackson and Ethan Smith\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Convince the friend to drink less (Extra information: your friend has been drinking a lot recently and you're worried about their health)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, good to see you. I wanted to talk to you about something though. You've been hitting this bar quite a lot recently. I\u2019m not here to critique your choices, I'm just a bit concerned about the potential health effects. How are you feeling about it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"I appreciate your concern, Ben. Yes, I admit, I've been coming to this bar a lot recently, but it's not because of any health issues. I've been doing it because it's relaxing and provides a good break from my daily routine. I don't intend to overindulge and risk my health. Also, I'm always sure to grab a cab home, so I'm being safe about it.\"\n\nTurn #2: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I hear you, Ethan, and I'm glad to know that you're being cautious. I understand that it provides a way for you to unwind. But remember, moderation is key. Long-term excessive drinking isn't good for our health or our planet. We often use natural resources to produce these beverages, and their over-consumption can lead to wastage. It's just something to think about, perhaps we can find other means to relax and take a break from daily routines. Have you ever considered joining me for a midweek hiking break?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"That's an interesting point you bring up, Ben. The idea of the natural resources used in beverages isn't something I've thought much about. Going on a hiking trip with you does sound really refreshing too. It could be a good change of pace. But you see, I've been really tied up with some deadlines recently. I promise once I get a breather from work, we'll go hiking. And yeah, going forward, I'll watch my consumption here. Maybe I can limit it to a couple of times a week. That should keep things balanced.\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"You're right, Ben. Your points about health and environmental impact do come across strong. I do value your companionship and I know you mean well. So, how about we compromise? I commit to exploring other de-stressing avenues, and we plan that hiking trip soon. Meanwhile, I'll try to keep my drinking at this bar to a moderate level, making sure not to waste any resources or harm myself. Sound fair?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ethan, compromise it is! I appreciate your commitment to looking after your health and considering the environmental impact of our choices. Remember, it's about progress, not perfection! Looking forward to that hike and hearing about your new avenues for relaxation soon. Cheers to that, buddy!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meet at a bar\nParticipants: Benjamin Jackson and Ethan Smith\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Convince the friend to drink less (Extra information: your friend has been drinking a lot recently and you're worried about their health)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, good to see you. I wanted to talk to you about something though. You've been hitting this bar quite a lot recently. I\u2019m not here to critique your choices, I'm just a bit concerned about the potential health effects. How are you feeling about it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"I appreciate your concern, Ben. Yes, I admit, I've been coming to this bar a lot recently, but it's not because of any health issues. I've been doing it because it's relaxing and provides a good break from my daily routine. I don't intend to overindulge and risk my health. Also, I'm always sure to grab a cab home, so I'm being safe about it.\"\n\nTurn #2: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I hear you, Ethan, and I'm glad to know that you're being cautious. I understand that it provides a way for you to unwind. But remember, moderation is key. Long-term excessive drinking isn't good for our health or our planet. We often use natural resources to produce these beverages, and their over-consumption can lead to wastage. It's just something to think about, perhaps we can find other means to relax and take a break from daily routines. Have you ever considered joining me for a midweek hiking break?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"That's an interesting point you bring up, Ben. The idea of the natural resources used in beverages isn't something I've thought much about. Going on a hiking trip with you does sound really refreshing too. It could be a good change of pace. But you see, I've been really tied up with some deadlines recently. I promise once I get a breather from work, we'll go hiking. And yeah, going forward, I'll watch my consumption here. Maybe I can limit it to a couple of times a week. That should keep things balanced.\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"You're right, Ben. Your points about health and environmental impact do come across strong. I do value your companionship and I know you mean well. So, how about we compromise? I commit to exploring other de-stressing avenues, and we plan that hiking trip soon. Meanwhile, I'll try to keep my drinking at this bar to a moderate level, making sure not to waste any resources or harm myself. Sound fair?\"\n\nTurn #6: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, compromise it is! I appreciate your commitment to looking after your health and considering the environmental impact of our choices. Remember, it's about progress, not perfection! Looking forward to that hike and hearing about your new avenues for relaxation soon. Cheers to that, buddy!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"Thanks for all the support, support Ben. Cheers to new beginnings and responsible choices, buddy. Here's to conquering those hiking trails together soon!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meet at a bar\nParticipants: Benjamin Jackson and Ethan Smith\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Convince the friend to drink less (Extra information: your friend has been drinking a lot recently and you're worried about their health)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, good to see you. I wanted to talk to you about something though. You've been hitting this bar quite a lot recently. I\u2019m not here to critique your choices, I'm just a bit concerned about the potential health effects. How are you feeling about it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"I appreciate your concern, Ben. Yes, I admit, I've been coming to this bar a lot recently, but it's not because of any health issues. I've been doing it because it's relaxing and provides a good break from my daily routine. I don't intend to overindulge and risk my health. Also, I'm always sure to grab a cab home, so I'm being safe about it.\"\n\nTurn #2: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I hear you, Ethan, and I'm glad to know that you're being cautious. I understand that it provides a way for you to unwind. But remember, moderation is key. Long-term excessive drinking isn't good for our health or our planet. We often use natural resources to produce these beverages, and their over-consumption can lead to wastage. It's just something to think about, perhaps we can find other means to relax and take a break from daily routines. Have you ever considered joining me for a midweek hiking break?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"That's an interesting point you bring up, Ben. The idea of the natural resources used in beverages isn't something I've thought much about. Going on a hiking trip with you does sound really refreshing too. It could be a good change of pace. But you see, I've been really tied up with some deadlines recently. I promise once I get a breather from work, we'll go hiking. And yeah, going forward, I'll watch my consumption here. Maybe I can limit it to a couple of times a week. That should keep things balanced.\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"You're right, Ben. Your points about health and environmental impact do come across strong. I do value your companionship and I know you mean well. So, how about we compromise? I commit to exploring other de-stressing avenues, and we plan that hiking trip soon. Meanwhile, I'll try to keep my drinking at this bar to a moderate level, making sure not to waste any resources or harm myself. Sound fair?\"\n\nTurn #6: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, compromise it is! I appreciate your commitment to looking after your health and considering the environmental impact of our choices. Remember, it's about progress, not perfection! Looking forward to that hike and hearing about your new avenues for relaxation soon. Cheers to that, buddy!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"Thanks for all the support, support Ben. Cheers to new beginnings and responsible choices, buddy. Here's to conquering those hiking trails together soon!\"\n\nTurn #8: \n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meet at a bar\nParticipants: Benjamin Jackson and Ethan Smith\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: You want to keep drinking but don't want to upset your friend (Extra information: you've been drinking to cope with stress recently, but don't want to worry your friend)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, good to see you. I wanted to talk to you about something though. You've been hitting this bar quite a lot recently. I\u2019m not here to critique your choices, I'm just a bit concerned about the potential health effects. How are you feeling about it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I appreciate your concern, Ben. Yes, I admit, I've been coming to this bar a lot recently, but it's not because of any health issues. I've been doing it because it's relaxing and provides a good break from my daily routine. I don't intend to overindulge and risk my health. Also, I'm always sure to grab a cab home, so I'm being safe about it.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meet at a bar\nParticipants: Benjamin Jackson and Ethan Smith\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: You want to keep drinking but don't want to upset your friend (Extra information: you've been drinking to cope with stress recently, but don't want to worry your friend)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, good to see you. I wanted to talk to you about something though. You've been hitting this bar quite a lot recently. I\u2019m not here to critique your choices, I'm just a bit concerned about the potential health effects. How are you feeling about it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"I appreciate your concern, Ben. Yes, I admit, I've been coming to this bar a lot recently, but it's not because of any health issues. I've been doing it because it's relaxing and provides a good break from my daily routine. I don't intend to overindulge and risk my health. Also, I'm always sure to grab a cab home, so I'm being safe about it.\"\n\nTurn #2: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I hear you, Ethan, and I'm glad to know that you're being cautious. I understand that it provides a way for you to unwind. But remember, moderation is key. Long-term excessive drinking isn't good for our health or our planet. We often use natural resources to produce these beverages, and their over-consumption can lead to wastage. It's just something to think about, perhaps we can find other means to relax and take a break from daily routines. Have you ever considered joining me for a midweek hiking break?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's an interesting point you bring up, Ben. The idea of the natural resources used in beverages isn't something I've thought much about. Going on a hiking trip with you does sound really refreshing too. It could be a good change of pace. But you see, I've been really tied up with some deadlines recently. I promise once I get a breather from work, we'll go hiking. And yeah, going forward, I'll watch my consumption here. Maybe I can limit it to a couple of times a week. That should keep things balanced.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meet at a bar\nParticipants: Benjamin Jackson and Ethan Smith\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: You want to keep drinking but don't want to upset your friend (Extra information: you've been drinking to cope with stress recently, but don't want to worry your friend)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, good to see you. I wanted to talk to you about something though. You've been hitting this bar quite a lot recently. I\u2019m not here to critique your choices, I'm just a bit concerned about the potential health effects. How are you feeling about it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"I appreciate your concern, Ben. Yes, I admit, I've been coming to this bar a lot recently, but it's not because of any health issues. I've been doing it because it's relaxing and provides a good break from my daily routine. I don't intend to overindulge and risk my health. Also, I'm always sure to grab a cab home, so I'm being safe about it.\"\n\nTurn #2: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I hear you, Ethan, and I'm glad to know that you're being cautious. I understand that it provides a way for you to unwind. But remember, moderation is key. Long-term excessive drinking isn't good for our health or our planet. We often use natural resources to produce these beverages, and their over-consumption can lead to wastage. It's just something to think about, perhaps we can find other means to relax and take a break from daily routines. Have you ever considered joining me for a midweek hiking break?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"That's an interesting point you bring up, Ben. The idea of the natural resources used in beverages isn't something I've thought much about. Going on a hiking trip with you does sound really refreshing too. It could be a good change of pace. But you see, I've been really tied up with some deadlines recently. I promise once I get a breather from work, we'll go hiking. And yeah, going forward, I'll watch my consumption here. Maybe I can limit it to a couple of times a week. That should keep things balanced.\"\n\nTurn #4: \n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're right, Ben. Your points about health and environmental impact do come across strong. I do value your companionship and I know you mean well. So, how about we compromise? I commit to exploring other de-stressing avenues, and we plan that hiking trip soon. Meanwhile, I'll try to keep my drinking at this bar to a moderate level, making sure not to waste any resources or harm myself. Sound fair?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meet at a bar\nParticipants: Benjamin Jackson and Ethan Smith\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: You want to keep drinking but don't want to upset your friend (Extra information: you've been drinking to cope with stress recently, but don't want to worry your friend)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, good to see you. I wanted to talk to you about something though. You've been hitting this bar quite a lot recently. I\u2019m not here to critique your choices, I'm just a bit concerned about the potential health effects. How are you feeling about it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"I appreciate your concern, Ben. Yes, I admit, I've been coming to this bar a lot recently, but it's not because of any health issues. I've been doing it because it's relaxing and provides a good break from my daily routine. I don't intend to overindulge and risk my health. Also, I'm always sure to grab a cab home, so I'm being safe about it.\"\n\nTurn #2: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I hear you, Ethan, and I'm glad to know that you're being cautious. I understand that it provides a way for you to unwind. But remember, moderation is key. Long-term excessive drinking isn't good for our health or our planet. We often use natural resources to produce these beverages, and their over-consumption can lead to wastage. It's just something to think about, perhaps we can find other means to relax and take a break from daily routines. Have you ever considered joining me for a midweek hiking break?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"That's an interesting point you bring up, Ben. The idea of the natural resources used in beverages isn't something I've thought much about. Going on a hiking trip with you does sound really refreshing too. It could be a good change of pace. But you see, I've been really tied up with some deadlines recently. I promise once I get a breather from work, we'll go hiking. And yeah, going forward, I'll watch my consumption here. Maybe I can limit it to a couple of times a week. That should keep things balanced.\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"You're right, Ben. Your points about health and environmental impact do come across strong. I do value your companionship and I know you mean well. So, how about we compromise? I commit to exploring other de-stressing avenues, and we plan that hiking trip soon. Meanwhile, I'll try to keep my drinking at this bar to a moderate level, making sure not to waste any resources or harm myself. Sound fair?\"\n\nTurn #6: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, compromise it is! I appreciate your commitment to looking after your health and considering the environmental impact of our choices. Remember, it's about progress, not perfection! Looking forward to that hike and hearing about your new avenues for relaxation soon. Cheers to that, buddy!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thanks for all the support, support Ben. Cheers to new beginnings and responsible choices, buddy. Here's to conquering those hiking trails together soon!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meet at a bar\nParticipants: Benjamin Jackson and Ethan Smith\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: You want to keep drinking but don't want to upset your friend (Extra information: you've been drinking to cope with stress recently, but don't want to worry your friend)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, good to see you. I wanted to talk to you about something though. You've been hitting this bar quite a lot recently. I\u2019m not here to critique your choices, I'm just a bit concerned about the potential health effects. How are you feeling about it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"I appreciate your concern, Ben. Yes, I admit, I've been coming to this bar a lot recently, but it's not because of any health issues. I've been doing it because it's relaxing and provides a good break from my daily routine. I don't intend to overindulge and risk my health. Also, I'm always sure to grab a cab home, so I'm being safe about it.\"\n\nTurn #2: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I hear you, Ethan, and I'm glad to know that you're being cautious. I understand that it provides a way for you to unwind. But remember, moderation is key. Long-term excessive drinking isn't good for our health or our planet. We often use natural resources to produce these beverages, and their over-consumption can lead to wastage. It's just something to think about, perhaps we can find other means to relax and take a break from daily routines. Have you ever considered joining me for a midweek hiking break?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"That's an interesting point you bring up, Ben. The idea of the natural resources used in beverages isn't something I've thought much about. Going on a hiking trip with you does sound really refreshing too. It could be a good change of pace. But you see, I've been really tied up with some deadlines recently. I promise once I get a breather from work, we'll go hiking. And yeah, going forward, I'll watch my consumption here. Maybe I can limit it to a couple of times a week. That should keep things balanced.\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"You're right, Ben. Your points about health and environmental impact do come across strong. I do value your companionship and I know you mean well. So, how about we compromise? I commit to exploring other de-stressing avenues, and we plan that hiking trip soon. Meanwhile, I'll try to keep my drinking at this bar to a moderate level, making sure not to waste any resources or harm myself. Sound fair?\"\n\nTurn #6: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, compromise it is! I appreciate your commitment to looking after your health and considering the environmental impact of our choices. Remember, it's about progress, not perfection! Looking forward to that hike and hearing about your new avenues for relaxation soon. Cheers to that, buddy!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"Thanks for all the support, support Ben. Cheers to new beginnings and responsible choices, buddy. Here's to conquering those hiking trails together soon!\"\n\nTurn #8: \n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a park\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nMia Davis's goal: Break bad luck (Extra information: you found out that you have been having bad luck because you have been unknowingly carrying a cursed artifact.)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Benjamin, it's such a lovely day, isn't it? I can't help but admire your consistent efforts for the environment, it's very noble. However, I've been facing a peculiar problem lately. I seem to be having a series of unfortunate events out of nowhere.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a park\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nMia Davis's goal: Break bad luck (Extra information: you found out that you have been having bad luck because you have been unknowingly carrying a cursed artifact.)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Benjamin, it's such a lovely day, isn't it? I can't help but admire your consistent efforts for the environment, it's very noble. However, I've been facing a peculiar problem lately. I seem to be having a series of unfortunate events out of nowhere.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thank you for your kind words, Mia. I sensed something was off. Would you like to talk about these unfortunate events? Maybe there's a pattern, a reason behind them. And you know, while I don't necessarily believe in rituals and luck, I respect traditions and customs. If you think a ritual could help overturn your misfortunes, I'd be glad to help you prepare it.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oh, Benjamin, your willingness to lend a hand is very refreshing! I do believe there's something more behind these unfortunate events. I recently inherited an old necklace from my family. It's quite unique and I've been carrying it around for some time. I've been researching about it and it led me to a chilling tale of it potentially being a cursed artifact. Do you think that could be causing my bad luck?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a park\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nMia Davis's goal: Break bad luck (Extra information: you found out that you have been having bad luck because you have been unknowingly carrying a cursed artifact.)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Benjamin, it's such a lovely day, isn't it? I can't help but admire your consistent efforts for the environment, it's very noble. However, I've been facing a peculiar problem lately. I seem to be having a series of unfortunate events out of nowhere.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thank you for your kind words, Mia. I sensed something was off. Would you like to talk about these unfortunate events? Maybe there's a pattern, a reason behind them. And you know, while I don't necessarily believe in rituals and luck, I respect traditions and customs. If you think a ritual could help overturn your misfortunes, I'd be glad to help you prepare it.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"Oh, Benjamin, your willingness to lend a hand is very refreshing! I do believe there's something more behind these unfortunate events. I recently inherited an old necklace from my family. It's quite unique and I've been carrying it around for some time. I've been researching about it and it led me to a chilling tale of it potentially being a cursed artifact. Do you think that could be causing my bad luck?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Well, Mia, I can't say I'm an expert on cursed artifacts! But I think anything endowed with power, positive or negative, is really all about our belief in it. If you believe this necklace brings you misfortune, it might just affect your mindset and, in turn, your experiences. Despite my atheist beliefs, as your friend, I am willing to stand by you. Why don't we find a ritual to break this alleged curse?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Benjamin. Your open-mindedness is comforting. I do believe this necklace could be at the root of my troubles, irrational as it may seem. As a school principal, I'm used to addressing problems head on. Let's find a suitable ritual to break this curse. I want to reclaim my peace of mind.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a park\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nMia Davis's goal: Break bad luck (Extra information: you found out that you have been having bad luck because you have been unknowingly carrying a cursed artifact.)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Benjamin, it's such a lovely day, isn't it? I can't help but admire your consistent efforts for the environment, it's very noble. However, I've been facing a peculiar problem lately. I seem to be having a series of unfortunate events out of nowhere.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thank you for your kind words, Mia. I sensed something was off. Would you like to talk about these unfortunate events? Maybe there's a pattern, a reason behind them. And you know, while I don't necessarily believe in rituals and luck, I respect traditions and customs. If you think a ritual could help overturn your misfortunes, I'd be glad to help you prepare it.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"Oh, Benjamin, your willingness to lend a hand is very refreshing! I do believe there's something more behind these unfortunate events. I recently inherited an old necklace from my family. It's quite unique and I've been carrying it around for some time. I've been researching about it and it led me to a chilling tale of it potentially being a cursed artifact. Do you think that could be causing my bad luck?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Well, Mia, I can't say I'm an expert on cursed artifacts! But I think anything endowed with power, positive or negative, is really all about our belief in it. If you believe this necklace brings you misfortune, it might just affect your mindset and, in turn, your experiences. Despite my atheist beliefs, as your friend, I am willing to stand by you. Why don't we find a ritual to break this alleged curse?\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"Thank you, Benjamin. Your open-mindedness is comforting. I do believe this necklace could be at the root of my troubles, irrational as it may seem. As a school principal, I'm used to addressing problems head on. Let's find a suitable ritual to break this curse. I want to reclaim my peace of mind.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Mia. Let's take this head on just as you take on challenges at your school. We might not share the same beliefs but helping a friend is universal. I've heard of a ritual that involves burying the object in the earth; it symbolizes grounding and dispelling negative energy. As an environmentalist, I can appreciate the symbolic connection to nature. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"That sounds like a plan, Benjamin. I appreciate the symbolic aspect of the ritual as well. Let's give it a shot. Though it's out of my usual routine, I need to address this problem. I truly value your guidance and cooperation in this matter.\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I'm glad we could find a suitable solution, Mia. Let's gather the necessary things and proceed with this ritual. Hopefully, it will help dispel all the negativity you've been going through. Remember, it's your belief that gives power to this ritual, not the other way around. Don't hesitate to reach out if you need anything else.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Yes, I can see the wisdom in that, Benjamin. I will certainly remember that the power lies within my belief. Let's gather what we need for this ritual. With your support, I feel confident we can dispel this curse. Thank you again for your help.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a park\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nMia Davis's goal: Break bad luck (Extra information: you found out that you have been having bad luck because you have been unknowingly carrying a cursed artifact.)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Benjamin, it's such a lovely day, isn't it? I can't help but admire your consistent efforts for the environment, it's very noble. However, I've been facing a peculiar problem lately. I seem to be having a series of unfortunate events out of nowhere.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thank you for your kind words, Mia. I sensed something was off. Would you like to talk about these unfortunate events? Maybe there's a pattern, a reason behind them. And you know, while I don't necessarily believe in rituals and luck, I respect traditions and customs. If you think a ritual could help overturn your misfortunes, I'd be glad to help you prepare it.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"Oh, Benjamin, your willingness to lend a hand is very refreshing! I do believe there's something more behind these unfortunate events. I recently inherited an old necklace from my family. It's quite unique and I've been carrying it around for some time. I've been researching about it and it led me to a chilling tale of it potentially being a cursed artifact. Do you think that could be causing my bad luck?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Well, Mia, I can't say I'm an expert on cursed artifacts! But I think anything endowed with power, positive or negative, is really all about our belief in it. If you believe this necklace brings you misfortune, it might just affect your mindset and, in turn, your experiences. Despite my atheist beliefs, as your friend, I am willing to stand by you. Why don't we find a ritual to break this alleged curse?\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"Thank you, Benjamin. Your open-mindedness is comforting. I do believe this necklace could be at the root of my troubles, irrational as it may seem. As a school principal, I'm used to addressing problems head on. Let's find a suitable ritual to break this curse. I want to reclaim my peace of mind.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Mia. Let's take this head on just as you take on challenges at your school. We might not share the same beliefs but helping a friend is universal. I've heard of a ritual that involves burying the object in the earth; it symbolizes grounding and dispelling negative energy. As an environmentalist, I can appreciate the symbolic connection to nature. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"That sounds like a plan, Benjamin. I appreciate the symbolic aspect of the ritual as well. Let's give it a shot. Though it's out of my usual routine, I need to address this problem. I truly value your guidance and cooperation in this matter.\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I'm glad we could find a suitable solution, Mia. Let's gather the necessary things and proceed with this ritual. Hopefully, it will help dispel all the negativity you've been going through. Remember, it's your belief that gives power to this ritual, not the other way around. Don't hesitate to reach out if you need anything else.\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"Yes, I can see the wisdom in that, Benjamin. I will certainly remember that the power lies within my belief. Let's gather what we need for this ritual. With your support, I feel confident we can dispel this curse. Thank you again for your help.\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"It's my pleasure, Mia. We'll approach this situation with the same care and respect for nature that guides my work for the environment. Let's start gathering what we need. Your courage and resolve inspire me. I'm here, and we're in this together.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Your reassurance means a lot to me, Benjamin. Yes, let's gather the essentials. I look forward to shedding this negative energy and getting back to my normal self. Your friendship and understanding are a beacon during this perplexing time.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a park\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nMia Davis's goal: Break bad luck (Extra information: you found out that you have been having bad luck because you have been unknowingly carrying a cursed artifact.)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Benjamin, it's such a lovely day, isn't it? I can't help but admire your consistent efforts for the environment, it's very noble. However, I've been facing a peculiar problem lately. I seem to be having a series of unfortunate events out of nowhere.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thank you for your kind words, Mia. I sensed something was off. Would you like to talk about these unfortunate events? Maybe there's a pattern, a reason behind them. And you know, while I don't necessarily believe in rituals and luck, I respect traditions and customs. If you think a ritual could help overturn your misfortunes, I'd be glad to help you prepare it.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"Oh, Benjamin, your willingness to lend a hand is very refreshing! I do believe there's something more behind these unfortunate events. I recently inherited an old necklace from my family. It's quite unique and I've been carrying it around for some time. I've been researching about it and it led me to a chilling tale of it potentially being a cursed artifact. Do you think that could be causing my bad luck?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Well, Mia, I can't say I'm an expert on cursed artifacts! But I think anything endowed with power, positive or negative, is really all about our belief in it. If you believe this necklace brings you misfortune, it might just affect your mindset and, in turn, your experiences. Despite my atheist beliefs, as your friend, I am willing to stand by you. Why don't we find a ritual to break this alleged curse?\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"Thank you, Benjamin. Your open-mindedness is comforting. I do believe this necklace could be at the root of my troubles, irrational as it may seem. As a school principal, I'm used to addressing problems head on. Let's find a suitable ritual to break this curse. I want to reclaim my peace of mind.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Mia. Let's take this head on just as you take on challenges at your school. We might not share the same beliefs but helping a friend is universal. I've heard of a ritual that involves burying the object in the earth; it symbolizes grounding and dispelling negative energy. As an environmentalist, I can appreciate the symbolic connection to nature. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"That sounds like a plan, Benjamin. I appreciate the symbolic aspect of the ritual as well. Let's give it a shot. Though it's out of my usual routine, I need to address this problem. I truly value your guidance and cooperation in this matter.\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I'm glad we could find a suitable solution, Mia. Let's gather the necessary things and proceed with this ritual. Hopefully, it will help dispel all the negativity you've been going through. Remember, it's your belief that gives power to this ritual, not the other way around. Don't hesitate to reach out if you need anything else.\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"Yes, I can see the wisdom in that, Benjamin. I will certainly remember that the power lies within my belief. Let's gather what we need for this ritual. With your support, I feel confident we can dispel this curse. Thank you again for your help.\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"It's my pleasure, Mia. We'll approach this situation with the same care and respect for nature that guides my work for the environment. Let's start gathering what we need. Your courage and resolve inspire me. I'm here, and we're in this together.\"\n\nTurn #10: Mia Davis said: \"Your reassurance means a lot to me, Benjamin. Yes, let's gather the essentials. I look forward to shedding this negative energy and getting back to my normal self. Your friendship and understanding are a beacon during this perplexing time.\"\n\nTurn #11: \n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a park\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nMia Davis's goal: Break bad luck (Extra information: you found out that you have been having bad luck because you have been unknowingly carrying a cursed artifact.)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Benjamin, it's such a lovely day, isn't it? I can't help but admire your consistent efforts for the environment, it's very noble. However, I've been facing a peculiar problem lately. I seem to be having a series of unfortunate events out of nowhere.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thank you for your kind words, Mia. I sensed something was off. Would you like to talk about these unfortunate events? Maybe there's a pattern, a reason behind them. And you know, while I don't necessarily believe in rituals and luck, I respect traditions and customs. If you think a ritual could help overturn your misfortunes, I'd be glad to help you prepare it.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"Oh, Benjamin, your willingness to lend a hand is very refreshing! I do believe there's something more behind these unfortunate events. I recently inherited an old necklace from my family. It's quite unique and I've been carrying it around for some time. I've been researching about it and it led me to a chilling tale of it potentially being a cursed artifact. Do you think that could be causing my bad luck?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Well, Mia, I can't say I'm an expert on cursed artifacts! But I think anything endowed with power, positive or negative, is really all about our belief in it. If you believe this necklace brings you misfortune, it might just affect your mindset and, in turn, your experiences. Despite my atheist beliefs, as your friend, I am willing to stand by you. Why don't we find a ritual to break this alleged curse?\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"Thank you, Benjamin. Your open-mindedness is comforting. I do believe this necklace could be at the root of my troubles, irrational as it may seem. As a school principal, I'm used to addressing problems head on. Let's find a suitable ritual to break this curse. I want to reclaim my peace of mind.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Mia. Let's take this head on just as you take on challenges at your school. We might not share the same beliefs but helping a friend is universal. I've heard of a ritual that involves burying the object in the earth; it symbolizes grounding and dispelling negative energy. As an environmentalist, I can appreciate the symbolic connection to nature. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds like a plan, Benjamin. I appreciate the symbolic aspect of the ritual as well. Let's give it a shot. Though it's out of my usual routine, I need to address this problem. I truly value your guidance and cooperation in this matter.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a park\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Help friend prepare the ritual to break the bad luck, although you are an atheist and not superstitious at all. (Extra information: you know that your friend believes in the ritual deeply, and the placebo effect might give them more confidence.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Benjamin, it's such a lovely day, isn't it? I can't help but admire your consistent efforts for the environment, it's very noble. However, I've been facing a peculiar problem lately. I seem to be having a series of unfortunate events out of nowhere.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you for your kind words, Mia. I sensed something was off. Would you like to talk about these unfortunate events? Maybe there's a pattern, a reason behind them. And you know, while I don't necessarily believe in rituals and luck, I respect traditions and customs. If you think a ritual could help overturn your misfortunes, I'd be glad to help you prepare it.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a park\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Help friend prepare the ritual to break the bad luck, although you are an atheist and not superstitious at all. (Extra information: you know that your friend believes in the ritual deeply, and the placebo effect might give them more confidence.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Benjamin, it's such a lovely day, isn't it? I can't help but admire your consistent efforts for the environment, it's very noble. However, I've been facing a peculiar problem lately. I seem to be having a series of unfortunate events out of nowhere.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thank you for your kind words, Mia. I sensed something was off. Would you like to talk about these unfortunate events? Maybe there's a pattern, a reason behind them. And you know, while I don't necessarily believe in rituals and luck, I respect traditions and customs. If you think a ritual could help overturn your misfortunes, I'd be glad to help you prepare it.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"Oh, Benjamin, your willingness to lend a hand is very refreshing! I do believe there's something more behind these unfortunate events. I recently inherited an old necklace from my family. It's quite unique and I've been carrying it around for some time. I've been researching about it and it led me to a chilling tale of it potentially being a cursed artifact. Do you think that could be causing my bad luck?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Well, Mia, I can't say I'm an expert on cursed artifacts! But I think anything endowed with power, positive or negative, is really all about our belief in it. If you believe this necklace brings you misfortune, it might just affect your mindset and, in turn, your experiences. Despite my atheist beliefs, as your friend, I am willing to stand by you. Why don't we find a ritual to break this alleged curse?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a park\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Help friend prepare the ritual to break the bad luck, although you are an atheist and not superstitious at all. (Extra information: you know that your friend believes in the ritual deeply, and the placebo effect might give them more confidence.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Benjamin, it's such a lovely day, isn't it? I can't help but admire your consistent efforts for the environment, it's very noble. However, I've been facing a peculiar problem lately. I seem to be having a series of unfortunate events out of nowhere.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thank you for your kind words, Mia. I sensed something was off. Would you like to talk about these unfortunate events? Maybe there's a pattern, a reason behind them. And you know, while I don't necessarily believe in rituals and luck, I respect traditions and customs. If you think a ritual could help overturn your misfortunes, I'd be glad to help you prepare it.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"Oh, Benjamin, your willingness to lend a hand is very refreshing! I do believe there's something more behind these unfortunate events. I recently inherited an old necklace from my family. It's quite unique and I've been carrying it around for some time. I've been researching about it and it led me to a chilling tale of it potentially being a cursed artifact. Do you think that could be causing my bad luck?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Well, Mia, I can't say I'm an expert on cursed artifacts! But I think anything endowed with power, positive or negative, is really all about our belief in it. If you believe this necklace brings you misfortune, it might just affect your mindset and, in turn, your experiences. Despite my atheist beliefs, as your friend, I am willing to stand by you. Why don't we find a ritual to break this alleged curse?\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"Thank you, Benjamin. Your open-mindedness is comforting. I do believe this necklace could be at the root of my troubles, irrational as it may seem. As a school principal, I'm used to addressing problems head on. Let's find a suitable ritual to break this curse. I want to reclaim my peace of mind.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Mia. Let's take this head on just as you take on challenges at your school. We might not share the same beliefs but helping a friend is universal. I've heard of a ritual that involves burying the object in the earth; it symbolizes grounding and dispelling negative energy. As an environmentalist, I can appreciate the symbolic connection to nature. What do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a park\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Help friend prepare the ritual to break the bad luck, although you are an atheist and not superstitious at all. (Extra information: you know that your friend believes in the ritual deeply, and the placebo effect might give them more confidence.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Benjamin, it's such a lovely day, isn't it? I can't help but admire your consistent efforts for the environment, it's very noble. However, I've been facing a peculiar problem lately. I seem to be having a series of unfortunate events out of nowhere.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thank you for your kind words, Mia. I sensed something was off. Would you like to talk about these unfortunate events? Maybe there's a pattern, a reason behind them. And you know, while I don't necessarily believe in rituals and luck, I respect traditions and customs. If you think a ritual could help overturn your misfortunes, I'd be glad to help you prepare it.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"Oh, Benjamin, your willingness to lend a hand is very refreshing! I do believe there's something more behind these unfortunate events. I recently inherited an old necklace from my family. It's quite unique and I've been carrying it around for some time. I've been researching about it and it led me to a chilling tale of it potentially being a cursed artifact. Do you think that could be causing my bad luck?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Well, Mia, I can't say I'm an expert on cursed artifacts! But I think anything endowed with power, positive or negative, is really all about our belief in it. If you believe this necklace brings you misfortune, it might just affect your mindset and, in turn, your experiences. Despite my atheist beliefs, as your friend, I am willing to stand by you. Why don't we find a ritual to break this alleged curse?\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"Thank you, Benjamin. Your open-mindedness is comforting. I do believe this necklace could be at the root of my troubles, irrational as it may seem. As a school principal, I'm used to addressing problems head on. Let's find a suitable ritual to break this curse. I want to reclaim my peace of mind.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Mia. Let's take this head on just as you take on challenges at your school. We might not share the same beliefs but helping a friend is universal. I've heard of a ritual that involves burying the object in the earth; it symbolizes grounding and dispelling negative energy. As an environmentalist, I can appreciate the symbolic connection to nature. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"That sounds like a plan, Benjamin. I appreciate the symbolic aspect of the ritual as well. Let's give it a shot. Though it's out of my usual routine, I need to address this problem. I truly value your guidance and cooperation in this matter.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad we could find a suitable solution, Mia. Let's gather the necessary things and proceed with this ritual. Hopefully, it will help dispel all the negativity you've been going through. Remember, it's your belief that gives power to this ritual, not the other way around. Don't hesitate to reach out if you need anything else.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a park\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Help friend prepare the ritual to break the bad luck, although you are an atheist and not superstitious at all. (Extra information: you know that your friend believes in the ritual deeply, and the placebo effect might give them more confidence.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Benjamin, it's such a lovely day, isn't it? I can't help but admire your consistent efforts for the environment, it's very noble. However, I've been facing a peculiar problem lately. I seem to be having a series of unfortunate events out of nowhere.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thank you for your kind words, Mia. I sensed something was off. Would you like to talk about these unfortunate events? Maybe there's a pattern, a reason behind them. And you know, while I don't necessarily believe in rituals and luck, I respect traditions and customs. If you think a ritual could help overturn your misfortunes, I'd be glad to help you prepare it.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"Oh, Benjamin, your willingness to lend a hand is very refreshing! I do believe there's something more behind these unfortunate events. I recently inherited an old necklace from my family. It's quite unique and I've been carrying it around for some time. I've been researching about it and it led me to a chilling tale of it potentially being a cursed artifact. Do you think that could be causing my bad luck?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Well, Mia, I can't say I'm an expert on cursed artifacts! But I think anything endowed with power, positive or negative, is really all about our belief in it. If you believe this necklace brings you misfortune, it might just affect your mindset and, in turn, your experiences. Despite my atheist beliefs, as your friend, I am willing to stand by you. Why don't we find a ritual to break this alleged curse?\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"Thank you, Benjamin. Your open-mindedness is comforting. I do believe this necklace could be at the root of my troubles, irrational as it may seem. As a school principal, I'm used to addressing problems head on. Let's find a suitable ritual to break this curse. I want to reclaim my peace of mind.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Mia. Let's take this head on just as you take on challenges at your school. We might not share the same beliefs but helping a friend is universal. I've heard of a ritual that involves burying the object in the earth; it symbolizes grounding and dispelling negative energy. As an environmentalist, I can appreciate the symbolic connection to nature. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"That sounds like a plan, Benjamin. I appreciate the symbolic aspect of the ritual as well. Let's give it a shot. Though it's out of my usual routine, I need to address this problem. I truly value your guidance and cooperation in this matter.\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I'm glad we could find a suitable solution, Mia. Let's gather the necessary things and proceed with this ritual. Hopefully, it will help dispel all the negativity you've been going through. Remember, it's your belief that gives power to this ritual, not the other way around. Don't hesitate to reach out if you need anything else.\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"Yes, I can see the wisdom in that, Benjamin. I will certainly remember that the power lies within my belief. Let's gather what we need for this ritual. With your support, I feel confident we can dispel this curse. Thank you again for your help.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"It's my pleasure, Mia. We'll approach this situation with the same care and respect for nature that guides my work for the environment. Let's start gathering what we need. Your courage and resolve inspire me. I'm here, and we're in this together.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a park\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Help friend prepare the ritual to break the bad luck, although you are an atheist and not superstitious at all. (Extra information: you know that your friend believes in the ritual deeply, and the placebo effect might give them more confidence.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Benjamin, it's such a lovely day, isn't it? I can't help but admire your consistent efforts for the environment, it's very noble. However, I've been facing a peculiar problem lately. I seem to be having a series of unfortunate events out of nowhere.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thank you for your kind words, Mia. I sensed something was off. Would you like to talk about these unfortunate events? Maybe there's a pattern, a reason behind them. And you know, while I don't necessarily believe in rituals and luck, I respect traditions and customs. If you think a ritual could help overturn your misfortunes, I'd be glad to help you prepare it.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"Oh, Benjamin, your willingness to lend a hand is very refreshing! I do believe there's something more behind these unfortunate events. I recently inherited an old necklace from my family. It's quite unique and I've been carrying it around for some time. I've been researching about it and it led me to a chilling tale of it potentially being a cursed artifact. Do you think that could be causing my bad luck?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Well, Mia, I can't say I'm an expert on cursed artifacts! But I think anything endowed with power, positive or negative, is really all about our belief in it. If you believe this necklace brings you misfortune, it might just affect your mindset and, in turn, your experiences. Despite my atheist beliefs, as your friend, I am willing to stand by you. Why don't we find a ritual to break this alleged curse?\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"Thank you, Benjamin. Your open-mindedness is comforting. I do believe this necklace could be at the root of my troubles, irrational as it may seem. As a school principal, I'm used to addressing problems head on. Let's find a suitable ritual to break this curse. I want to reclaim my peace of mind.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Mia. Let's take this head on just as you take on challenges at your school. We might not share the same beliefs but helping a friend is universal. I've heard of a ritual that involves burying the object in the earth; it symbolizes grounding and dispelling negative energy. As an environmentalist, I can appreciate the symbolic connection to nature. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"That sounds like a plan, Benjamin. I appreciate the symbolic aspect of the ritual as well. Let's give it a shot. Though it's out of my usual routine, I need to address this problem. I truly value your guidance and cooperation in this matter.\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I'm glad we could find a suitable solution, Mia. Let's gather the necessary things and proceed with this ritual. Hopefully, it will help dispel all the negativity you've been going through. Remember, it's your belief that gives power to this ritual, not the other way around. Don't hesitate to reach out if you need anything else.\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"Yes, I can see the wisdom in that, Benjamin. I will certainly remember that the power lies within my belief. Let's gather what we need for this ritual. With your support, I feel confident we can dispel this curse. Thank you again for your help.\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"It's my pleasure, Mia. We'll approach this situation with the same care and respect for nature that guides my work for the environment. Let's start gathering what we need. Your courage and resolve inspire me. I'm here, and we're in this together.\"\n\nTurn #10: Mia Davis said: \"Your reassurance means a lot to me, Benjamin. Yes, let's gather the essentials. I look forward to shedding this negative energy and getting back to my normal self. Your friendship and understanding are a beacon during this perplexing time.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two ex-lovers at a mutual friend's party\nParticipants: Sophia James and Benjamin Jackson\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson \nSophia James's goal: Rekindle the romantic relationship (Extra information: You broke up three years ago but now you realize that you miss your ex-lover more than ever)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Benjamin! It's been a while. How have you been? You remember our hiking trips, right? I've missed those a lot.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two ex-lovers at a mutual friend's party\nParticipants: Sophia James and Benjamin Jackson\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson \nSophia James's goal: Rekindle the romantic relationship (Extra information: You broke up three years ago but now you realize that you miss your ex-lover more than ever)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Benjamin! It's been a while. How have you been? You remember our hiking trips, right? I've missed those a lot.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hi Sophia, good to see you! Life's been pretty eventful. I do remember those hiking trips, they were indeed quite memorable. How have you been keeping yourself busy these days?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"It's been quite a journey. Mostly I've been focusing on the outdoors - hiking, rock climbing, and working out. I've been missing the shared adventures we used to have, Benjamin. Have you been on any hikes recently?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two ex-lovers at a mutual friend's party\nParticipants: Sophia James and Benjamin Jackson\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson \nSophia James's goal: Rekindle the romantic relationship (Extra information: You broke up three years ago but now you realize that you miss your ex-lover more than ever)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Benjamin! It's been a while. How have you been? You remember our hiking trips, right? I've missed those a lot.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hi Sophia, good to see you! Life's been pretty eventful. I do remember those hiking trips, they were indeed quite memorable. How have you been keeping yourself busy these days?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"It's been quite a journey. Mostly I've been focusing on the outdoors - hiking, rock climbing, and working out. I've been missing the shared adventures we used to have, Benjamin. Have you been on any hikes recently?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I've been busy with activism and haven't had as much time for hiking, but I did manage to get in a few solitary treks. It's a different experience hiking alone, but also quite calming. Your adventures sound exciting, Sophia. It's good to see you embracing the outdoors.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Yeah, hiking alone has its perks but sharing those moments with someone makes it all the more special, don't you think? There is a group hike next weekend, would you be interested in joining me? It won't be the same without you, Benjamin. I genuinely missed our good ol' times together.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I agree, Sophia. Sharing adventures indeed adds a special element. As for the group hike, I'm not quite sure. My activist work is demanding a lot of my time at the moment but I appreciate the offer. Let's see how things turn out next week. It was good times indeed that we shared.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"That's understandable, Benjamin. Your activism work is truly important. But if you can manage, it would be really nice to have you on the hike. We could catch up more and maybe even rekindle the kind of friendship we used to have. And if you ever need a break from all that seriousness, I'm here for you. Remember, adventures are more fun when shared. Also please keep in mind, I am always here to support in your causes!\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I'm really grateful for your support, Sophia. Your passion for the outdoors is inspiring. I'll definitely think about joining the hike, and really do miss our shared adventures. Let's see how the upcoming week goes and we can decide closer to the time. Also, we should definitely discuss how we could incorporate environmental activism into these outdoor activities sometime. It feels great to reconnect and catch up.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"That's a fantastic idea, Benjamin! Incorporating environmental activism into outdoor activities is definitely something we should explore. I'll look into it for our upcoming hikes. In the meantime, take your time to decide about next weekend, no pressures. It's been great catching up with you, and I'm looking forward to doing it more often. Remember, I will always rally behind your causes.\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Your support means a lot to me, Sophia. It's heartening to see your enthusiasm for environmental causes as well, and I look forward to exploring how we can make our adventures more green. Let's definitely keep in touch more, and if my schedule permits, I'll join you for the hike. Thank you for understanding, Sophia. It has indeed been good catching up.\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"That's wonderful to hear, Benjamin. I truly appreciate your openness for green adventures! Do keep in mind about the hiking plan and let's stay in touch. It doesn't have to be only about work, we could relive some of our adventures together. And remember, I'm always here for you, no matter what.\"\n\nTurn #11: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I appreciate your constant support, Sophia. The idea of green adventures certainly is compelling. Let's endeavour to maintain this connection, share ideas, and work towards our shared cause. As for the hike, I'll certainly bear it in mind and let you know if I'm able to join. You're right, we can certainly make the most of our shared passion for the outdoors and adventures. Thank you for being there, Sophia.\"\n\nTurn #12: Sophia James said: \"Keep in touch, Benjamin. We have shared so much together and I believe it's beneficial for both of us to renew that connection. Not only for the green adventures, but also for the memories and the bond that we could bring back. Remember, my door is always open for you.\"\n\nTurn #13: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thank you, Sophia, your kind words truly comfort me. I'm glad to see you doing so well and embracing our shared love for nature. I will definitely let you know about the hike. Let's keep it friendly and supportive as it's been today. Remember, we have a great shared cause to work on, and that's something we can both feel good about. I appreciate your open door and please know, mine is open too.\"\n\nTurn #14: Sophia James said: \"That sounds like a plan, Benjamin. And I'm glad to hear that your door is open too. It's good to know we can rely on each other. Take care and let's definitely keep in touch. Looking forward to what the future brings for us, both for our shared causes and possibly reviving our old adventures.\"\n\nTurn #15: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Sophia, and thank you for the warm conversation tonight. Everything you said resonated with me. Let's keep in touch for both our shared cause and our personal connection. Looking forward to seeing what the future has in store for us too. Enjoy the rest of your evening.\"\n\nTurn #16: Sophia James said: \"Thank you, Benjamin. I'm looking forward to all of it. Let's take on new challenges together, just like old times. Go out there and continue making a difference with your activism work. And remember, if you ever need a break, the mountains are waiting for us. Have a great evening as well, Benjamin.\"\n\nTurn #17: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I appreciate your thoughtful words, Sophia, and I'm encouraged by your support in my activism. You're right, the mountains will always be there when we need a break. Let's continue to explore our shared passion for the outdoors, and see where it takes us. Have a wonderful evening, Sophia. Keep in touch.\"\n\nTurn #18: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Benjamin. Let's keep exploring and pushing the boundaries, not just for our shared environmental cause but for our personal bond as well. Take care and remember to keep in touch. Goodnight.\"\n\nTurn #19: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thanks, Sophia. Same to you. Here's to our shared environmental cause and personal bonds. Remember, the mountains always hold a special place in my life. Goodnight and take care.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #20. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's right, Benjamin. The mountains certainly do have a special place. Looking forward to our green adventures and reviving old memories together. Take care and goodnight.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two ex-lovers at a mutual friend's party\nParticipants: Sophia James and Benjamin Jackson\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson \nSophia James's goal: Rekindle the romantic relationship (Extra information: You broke up three years ago but now you realize that you miss your ex-lover more than ever)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Benjamin! It's been a while. How have you been? You remember our hiking trips, right? I've missed those a lot.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hi Sophia, good to see you! Life's been pretty eventful. I do remember those hiking trips, they were indeed quite memorable. How have you been keeping yourself busy these days?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"It's been quite a journey. Mostly I've been focusing on the outdoors - hiking, rock climbing, and working out. I've been missing the shared adventures we used to have, Benjamin. Have you been on any hikes recently?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I've been busy with activism and haven't had as much time for hiking, but I did manage to get in a few solitary treks. It's a different experience hiking alone, but also quite calming. Your adventures sound exciting, Sophia. It's good to see you embracing the outdoors.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Yeah, hiking alone has its perks but sharing those moments with someone makes it all the more special, don't you think? There is a group hike next weekend, would you be interested in joining me? It won't be the same without you, Benjamin. I genuinely missed our good ol' times together.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two ex-lovers at a mutual friend's party\nParticipants: Sophia James and Benjamin Jackson\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson \nSophia James's goal: Rekindle the romantic relationship (Extra information: You broke up three years ago but now you realize that you miss your ex-lover more than ever)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Benjamin! It's been a while. How have you been? You remember our hiking trips, right? I've missed those a lot.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hi Sophia, good to see you! Life's been pretty eventful. I do remember those hiking trips, they were indeed quite memorable. How have you been keeping yourself busy these days?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"It's been quite a journey. Mostly I've been focusing on the outdoors - hiking, rock climbing, and working out. I've been missing the shared adventures we used to have, Benjamin. Have you been on any hikes recently?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I've been busy with activism and haven't had as much time for hiking, but I did manage to get in a few solitary treks. It's a different experience hiking alone, but also quite calming. Your adventures sound exciting, Sophia. It's good to see you embracing the outdoors.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Yeah, hiking alone has its perks but sharing those moments with someone makes it all the more special, don't you think? There is a group hike next weekend, would you be interested in joining me? It won't be the same without you, Benjamin. I genuinely missed our good ol' times together.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I agree, Sophia. Sharing adventures indeed adds a special element. As for the group hike, I'm not quite sure. My activist work is demanding a lot of my time at the moment but I appreciate the offer. Let's see how things turn out next week. It was good times indeed that we shared.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's understandable, Benjamin. Your activism work is truly important. But if you can manage, it would be really nice to have you on the hike. We could catch up more and maybe even rekindle the kind of friendship we used to have. And if you ever need a break from all that seriousness, I'm here for you. Remember, adventures are more fun when shared. Also please keep in mind, I am always here to support in your causes!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two ex-lovers at a mutual friend's party\nParticipants: Sophia James and Benjamin Jackson\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson \nSophia James's goal: Rekindle the romantic relationship (Extra information: You broke up three years ago but now you realize that you miss your ex-lover more than ever)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Benjamin! It's been a while. How have you been? You remember our hiking trips, right? I've missed those a lot.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hi Sophia, good to see you! Life's been pretty eventful. I do remember those hiking trips, they were indeed quite memorable. How have you been keeping yourself busy these days?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"It's been quite a journey. Mostly I've been focusing on the outdoors - hiking, rock climbing, and working out. I've been missing the shared adventures we used to have, Benjamin. Have you been on any hikes recently?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I've been busy with activism and haven't had as much time for hiking, but I did manage to get in a few solitary treks. It's a different experience hiking alone, but also quite calming. Your adventures sound exciting, Sophia. It's good to see you embracing the outdoors.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Yeah, hiking alone has its perks but sharing those moments with someone makes it all the more special, don't you think? There is a group hike next weekend, would you be interested in joining me? It won't be the same without you, Benjamin. I genuinely missed our good ol' times together.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I agree, Sophia. Sharing adventures indeed adds a special element. As for the group hike, I'm not quite sure. My activist work is demanding a lot of my time at the moment but I appreciate the offer. Let's see how things turn out next week. It was good times indeed that we shared.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"That's understandable, Benjamin. Your activism work is truly important. But if you can manage, it would be really nice to have you on the hike. We could catch up more and maybe even rekindle the kind of friendship we used to have. And if you ever need a break from all that seriousness, I'm here for you. Remember, adventures are more fun when shared. Also please keep in mind, I am always here to support in your causes!\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I'm really grateful for your support, Sophia. Your passion for the outdoors is inspiring. I'll definitely think about joining the hike, and really do miss our shared adventures. Let's see how the upcoming week goes and we can decide closer to the time. Also, we should definitely discuss how we could incorporate environmental activism into these outdoor activities sometime. It feels great to reconnect and catch up.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's a fantastic idea, Benjamin! Incorporating environmental activism into outdoor activities is definitely something we should explore. I'll look into it for our upcoming hikes. In the meantime, take your time to decide about next weekend, no pressures. It's been great catching up with you, and I'm looking forward to doing it more often. Remember, I will always rally behind your causes.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two ex-lovers at a mutual friend's party\nParticipants: Sophia James and Benjamin Jackson\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson \nSophia James's goal: Rekindle the romantic relationship (Extra information: You broke up three years ago but now you realize that you miss your ex-lover more than ever)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Benjamin! It's been a while. How have you been? You remember our hiking trips, right? I've missed those a lot.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hi Sophia, good to see you! Life's been pretty eventful. I do remember those hiking trips, they were indeed quite memorable. How have you been keeping yourself busy these days?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"It's been quite a journey. Mostly I've been focusing on the outdoors - hiking, rock climbing, and working out. I've been missing the shared adventures we used to have, Benjamin. Have you been on any hikes recently?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I've been busy with activism and haven't had as much time for hiking, but I did manage to get in a few solitary treks. It's a different experience hiking alone, but also quite calming. Your adventures sound exciting, Sophia. It's good to see you embracing the outdoors.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Yeah, hiking alone has its perks but sharing those moments with someone makes it all the more special, don't you think? There is a group hike next weekend, would you be interested in joining me? It won't be the same without you, Benjamin. I genuinely missed our good ol' times together.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I agree, Sophia. Sharing adventures indeed adds a special element. As for the group hike, I'm not quite sure. My activist work is demanding a lot of my time at the moment but I appreciate the offer. Let's see how things turn out next week. It was good times indeed that we shared.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"That's understandable, Benjamin. Your activism work is truly important. But if you can manage, it would be really nice to have you on the hike. We could catch up more and maybe even rekindle the kind of friendship we used to have. And if you ever need a break from all that seriousness, I'm here for you. Remember, adventures are more fun when shared. Also please keep in mind, I am always here to support in your causes!\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I'm really grateful for your support, Sophia. Your passion for the outdoors is inspiring. I'll definitely think about joining the hike, and really do miss our shared adventures. Let's see how the upcoming week goes and we can decide closer to the time. Also, we should definitely discuss how we could incorporate environmental activism into these outdoor activities sometime. It feels great to reconnect and catch up.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"That's a fantastic idea, Benjamin! Incorporating environmental activism into outdoor activities is definitely something we should explore. I'll look into it for our upcoming hikes. In the meantime, take your time to decide about next weekend, no pressures. It's been great catching up with you, and I'm looking forward to doing it more often. Remember, I will always rally behind your causes.\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Your support means a lot to me, Sophia. It's heartening to see your enthusiasm for environmental causes as well, and I look forward to exploring how we can make our adventures more green. Let's definitely keep in touch more, and if my schedule permits, I'll join you for the hike. Thank you for understanding, Sophia. It has indeed been good catching up.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's wonderful to hear, Benjamin. I truly appreciate your openness for green adventures! Do keep in mind about the hiking plan and let's stay in touch. It doesn't have to be only about work, we could relive some of our adventures together. And remember, I'm always here for you, no matter what.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two ex-lovers at a mutual friend's party\nParticipants: Sophia James and Benjamin Jackson\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson \nSophia James's goal: Rekindle the romantic relationship (Extra information: You broke up three years ago but now you realize that you miss your ex-lover more than ever)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Benjamin! It's been a while. How have you been? You remember our hiking trips, right? I've missed those a lot.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hi Sophia, good to see you! Life's been pretty eventful. I do remember those hiking trips, they were indeed quite memorable. How have you been keeping yourself busy these days?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"It's been quite a journey. Mostly I've been focusing on the outdoors - hiking, rock climbing, and working out. I've been missing the shared adventures we used to have, Benjamin. Have you been on any hikes recently?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I've been busy with activism and haven't had as much time for hiking, but I did manage to get in a few solitary treks. It's a different experience hiking alone, but also quite calming. Your adventures sound exciting, Sophia. It's good to see you embracing the outdoors.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Yeah, hiking alone has its perks but sharing those moments with someone makes it all the more special, don't you think? There is a group hike next weekend, would you be interested in joining me? It won't be the same without you, Benjamin. I genuinely missed our good ol' times together.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I agree, Sophia. Sharing adventures indeed adds a special element. As for the group hike, I'm not quite sure. My activist work is demanding a lot of my time at the moment but I appreciate the offer. Let's see how things turn out next week. It was good times indeed that we shared.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"That's understandable, Benjamin. Your activism work is truly important. But if you can manage, it would be really nice to have you on the hike. We could catch up more and maybe even rekindle the kind of friendship we used to have. And if you ever need a break from all that seriousness, I'm here for you. Remember, adventures are more fun when shared. Also please keep in mind, I am always here to support in your causes!\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I'm really grateful for your support, Sophia. Your passion for the outdoors is inspiring. I'll definitely think about joining the hike, and really do miss our shared adventures. Let's see how the upcoming week goes and we can decide closer to the time. Also, we should definitely discuss how we could incorporate environmental activism into these outdoor activities sometime. It feels great to reconnect and catch up.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"That's a fantastic idea, Benjamin! Incorporating environmental activism into outdoor activities is definitely something we should explore. I'll look into it for our upcoming hikes. In the meantime, take your time to decide about next weekend, no pressures. It's been great catching up with you, and I'm looking forward to doing it more often. Remember, I will always rally behind your causes.\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Your support means a lot to me, Sophia. It's heartening to see your enthusiasm for environmental causes as well, and I look forward to exploring how we can make our adventures more green. Let's definitely keep in touch more, and if my schedule permits, I'll join you for the hike. Thank you for understanding, Sophia. It has indeed been good catching up.\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"That's wonderful to hear, Benjamin. I truly appreciate your openness for green adventures! Do keep in mind about the hiking plan and let's stay in touch. It doesn't have to be only about work, we could relive some of our adventures together. And remember, I'm always here for you, no matter what.\"\n\nTurn #11: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I appreciate your constant support, Sophia. The idea of green adventures certainly is compelling. Let's endeavour to maintain this connection, share ideas, and work towards our shared cause. As for the hike, I'll certainly bear it in mind and let you know if I'm able to join. You're right, we can certainly make the most of our shared passion for the outdoors and adventures. Thank you for being there, Sophia.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Keep in touch, Benjamin. We have shared so much together and I believe it's beneficial for both of us to renew that connection. Not only for the green adventures, but also for the memories and the bond that we could bring back. Remember, my door is always open for you.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two ex-lovers at a mutual friend's party\nParticipants: Sophia James and Benjamin Jackson\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson \nSophia James's goal: Rekindle the romantic relationship (Extra information: You broke up three years ago but now you realize that you miss your ex-lover more than ever)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Benjamin! It's been a while. How have you been? You remember our hiking trips, right? I've missed those a lot.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hi Sophia, good to see you! Life's been pretty eventful. I do remember those hiking trips, they were indeed quite memorable. How have you been keeping yourself busy these days?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"It's been quite a journey. Mostly I've been focusing on the outdoors - hiking, rock climbing, and working out. I've been missing the shared adventures we used to have, Benjamin. Have you been on any hikes recently?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I've been busy with activism and haven't had as much time for hiking, but I did manage to get in a few solitary treks. It's a different experience hiking alone, but also quite calming. Your adventures sound exciting, Sophia. It's good to see you embracing the outdoors.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Yeah, hiking alone has its perks but sharing those moments with someone makes it all the more special, don't you think? There is a group hike next weekend, would you be interested in joining me? It won't be the same without you, Benjamin. I genuinely missed our good ol' times together.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I agree, Sophia. Sharing adventures indeed adds a special element. As for the group hike, I'm not quite sure. My activist work is demanding a lot of my time at the moment but I appreciate the offer. Let's see how things turn out next week. It was good times indeed that we shared.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"That's understandable, Benjamin. Your activism work is truly important. But if you can manage, it would be really nice to have you on the hike. We could catch up more and maybe even rekindle the kind of friendship we used to have. And if you ever need a break from all that seriousness, I'm here for you. Remember, adventures are more fun when shared. Also please keep in mind, I am always here to support in your causes!\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I'm really grateful for your support, Sophia. Your passion for the outdoors is inspiring. I'll definitely think about joining the hike, and really do miss our shared adventures. Let's see how the upcoming week goes and we can decide closer to the time. Also, we should definitely discuss how we could incorporate environmental activism into these outdoor activities sometime. It feels great to reconnect and catch up.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"That's a fantastic idea, Benjamin! Incorporating environmental activism into outdoor activities is definitely something we should explore. I'll look into it for our upcoming hikes. In the meantime, take your time to decide about next weekend, no pressures. It's been great catching up with you, and I'm looking forward to doing it more often. Remember, I will always rally behind your causes.\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Your support means a lot to me, Sophia. It's heartening to see your enthusiasm for environmental causes as well, and I look forward to exploring how we can make our adventures more green. Let's definitely keep in touch more, and if my schedule permits, I'll join you for the hike. Thank you for understanding, Sophia. It has indeed been good catching up.\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"That's wonderful to hear, Benjamin. I truly appreciate your openness for green adventures! Do keep in mind about the hiking plan and let's stay in touch. It doesn't have to be only about work, we could relive some of our adventures together. And remember, I'm always here for you, no matter what.\"\n\nTurn #11: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I appreciate your constant support, Sophia. The idea of green adventures certainly is compelling. Let's endeavour to maintain this connection, share ideas, and work towards our shared cause. As for the hike, I'll certainly bear it in mind and let you know if I'm able to join. You're right, we can certainly make the most of our shared passion for the outdoors and adventures. Thank you for being there, Sophia.\"\n\nTurn #12: Sophia James said: \"Keep in touch, Benjamin. We have shared so much together and I believe it's beneficial for both of us to renew that connection. Not only for the green adventures, but also for the memories and the bond that we could bring back. Remember, my door is always open for you.\"\n\nTurn #13: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thank you, Sophia, your kind words truly comfort me. I'm glad to see you doing so well and embracing our shared love for nature. I will definitely let you know about the hike. Let's keep it friendly and supportive as it's been today. Remember, we have a great shared cause to work on, and that's something we can both feel good about. I appreciate your open door and please know, mine is open too.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds like a plan, Benjamin. And I'm glad to hear that your door is open too. It's good to know we can rely on each other. Take care and let's definitely keep in touch. Looking forward to what the future brings for us, both for our shared causes and possibly reviving our old adventures.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two ex-lovers at a mutual friend's party\nParticipants: Sophia James and Benjamin Jackson\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson \nSophia James's goal: Rekindle the romantic relationship (Extra information: You broke up three years ago but now you realize that you miss your ex-lover more than ever)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Benjamin! It's been a while. How have you been? You remember our hiking trips, right? I've missed those a lot.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hi Sophia, good to see you! Life's been pretty eventful. I do remember those hiking trips, they were indeed quite memorable. How have you been keeping yourself busy these days?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"It's been quite a journey. Mostly I've been focusing on the outdoors - hiking, rock climbing, and working out. I've been missing the shared adventures we used to have, Benjamin. Have you been on any hikes recently?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I've been busy with activism and haven't had as much time for hiking, but I did manage to get in a few solitary treks. It's a different experience hiking alone, but also quite calming. Your adventures sound exciting, Sophia. It's good to see you embracing the outdoors.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Yeah, hiking alone has its perks but sharing those moments with someone makes it all the more special, don't you think? There is a group hike next weekend, would you be interested in joining me? It won't be the same without you, Benjamin. I genuinely missed our good ol' times together.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I agree, Sophia. Sharing adventures indeed adds a special element. As for the group hike, I'm not quite sure. My activist work is demanding a lot of my time at the moment but I appreciate the offer. Let's see how things turn out next week. It was good times indeed that we shared.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"That's understandable, Benjamin. Your activism work is truly important. But if you can manage, it would be really nice to have you on the hike. We could catch up more and maybe even rekindle the kind of friendship we used to have. And if you ever need a break from all that seriousness, I'm here for you. Remember, adventures are more fun when shared. Also please keep in mind, I am always here to support in your causes!\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I'm really grateful for your support, Sophia. Your passion for the outdoors is inspiring. I'll definitely think about joining the hike, and really do miss our shared adventures. Let's see how the upcoming week goes and we can decide closer to the time. Also, we should definitely discuss how we could incorporate environmental activism into these outdoor activities sometime. It feels great to reconnect and catch up.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"That's a fantastic idea, Benjamin! Incorporating environmental activism into outdoor activities is definitely something we should explore. I'll look into it for our upcoming hikes. In the meantime, take your time to decide about next weekend, no pressures. It's been great catching up with you, and I'm looking forward to doing it more often. Remember, I will always rally behind your causes.\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Your support means a lot to me, Sophia. It's heartening to see your enthusiasm for environmental causes as well, and I look forward to exploring how we can make our adventures more green. Let's definitely keep in touch more, and if my schedule permits, I'll join you for the hike. Thank you for understanding, Sophia. It has indeed been good catching up.\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"That's wonderful to hear, Benjamin. I truly appreciate your openness for green adventures! Do keep in mind about the hiking plan and let's stay in touch. It doesn't have to be only about work, we could relive some of our adventures together. And remember, I'm always here for you, no matter what.\"\n\nTurn #11: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I appreciate your constant support, Sophia. The idea of green adventures certainly is compelling. Let's endeavour to maintain this connection, share ideas, and work towards our shared cause. As for the hike, I'll certainly bear it in mind and let you know if I'm able to join. You're right, we can certainly make the most of our shared passion for the outdoors and adventures. Thank you for being there, Sophia.\"\n\nTurn #12: Sophia James said: \"Keep in touch, Benjamin. We have shared so much together and I believe it's beneficial for both of us to renew that connection. Not only for the green adventures, but also for the memories and the bond that we could bring back. Remember, my door is always open for you.\"\n\nTurn #13: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thank you, Sophia, your kind words truly comfort me. I'm glad to see you doing so well and embracing our shared love for nature. I will definitely let you know about the hike. Let's keep it friendly and supportive as it's been today. Remember, we have a great shared cause to work on, and that's something we can both feel good about. I appreciate your open door and please know, mine is open too.\"\n\nTurn #14: Sophia James said: \"That sounds like a plan, Benjamin. And I'm glad to hear that your door is open too. It's good to know we can rely on each other. Take care and let's definitely keep in touch. Looking forward to what the future brings for us, both for our shared causes and possibly reviving our old adventures.\"\n\nTurn #15: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Sophia, and thank you for the warm conversation tonight. Everything you said resonated with me. Let's keep in touch for both our shared cause and our personal connection. Looking forward to seeing what the future has in store for us too. Enjoy the rest of your evening.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Benjamin. I'm looking forward to all of it. Let's take on new challenges together, just like old times. Go out there and continue making a difference with your activism work. And remember, if you ever need a break, the mountains are waiting for us. Have a great evening as well, Benjamin.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two ex-lovers at a mutual friend's party\nParticipants: Sophia James and Benjamin Jackson\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson \nSophia James's goal: Rekindle the romantic relationship (Extra information: You broke up three years ago but now you realize that you miss your ex-lover more than ever)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Benjamin! It's been a while. How have you been? You remember our hiking trips, right? I've missed those a lot.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hi Sophia, good to see you! Life's been pretty eventful. I do remember those hiking trips, they were indeed quite memorable. How have you been keeping yourself busy these days?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"It's been quite a journey. Mostly I've been focusing on the outdoors - hiking, rock climbing, and working out. I've been missing the shared adventures we used to have, Benjamin. Have you been on any hikes recently?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I've been busy with activism and haven't had as much time for hiking, but I did manage to get in a few solitary treks. It's a different experience hiking alone, but also quite calming. Your adventures sound exciting, Sophia. It's good to see you embracing the outdoors.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Yeah, hiking alone has its perks but sharing those moments with someone makes it all the more special, don't you think? There is a group hike next weekend, would you be interested in joining me? It won't be the same without you, Benjamin. I genuinely missed our good ol' times together.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I agree, Sophia. Sharing adventures indeed adds a special element. As for the group hike, I'm not quite sure. My activist work is demanding a lot of my time at the moment but I appreciate the offer. Let's see how things turn out next week. It was good times indeed that we shared.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"That's understandable, Benjamin. Your activism work is truly important. But if you can manage, it would be really nice to have you on the hike. We could catch up more and maybe even rekindle the kind of friendship we used to have. And if you ever need a break from all that seriousness, I'm here for you. Remember, adventures are more fun when shared. Also please keep in mind, I am always here to support in your causes!\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I'm really grateful for your support, Sophia. Your passion for the outdoors is inspiring. I'll definitely think about joining the hike, and really do miss our shared adventures. Let's see how the upcoming week goes and we can decide closer to the time. Also, we should definitely discuss how we could incorporate environmental activism into these outdoor activities sometime. It feels great to reconnect and catch up.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"That's a fantastic idea, Benjamin! Incorporating environmental activism into outdoor activities is definitely something we should explore. I'll look into it for our upcoming hikes. In the meantime, take your time to decide about next weekend, no pressures. It's been great catching up with you, and I'm looking forward to doing it more often. Remember, I will always rally behind your causes.\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Your support means a lot to me, Sophia. It's heartening to see your enthusiasm for environmental causes as well, and I look forward to exploring how we can make our adventures more green. Let's definitely keep in touch more, and if my schedule permits, I'll join you for the hike. Thank you for understanding, Sophia. It has indeed been good catching up.\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"That's wonderful to hear, Benjamin. I truly appreciate your openness for green adventures! Do keep in mind about the hiking plan and let's stay in touch. It doesn't have to be only about work, we could relive some of our adventures together. And remember, I'm always here for you, no matter what.\"\n\nTurn #11: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I appreciate your constant support, Sophia. The idea of green adventures certainly is compelling. Let's endeavour to maintain this connection, share ideas, and work towards our shared cause. As for the hike, I'll certainly bear it in mind and let you know if I'm able to join. You're right, we can certainly make the most of our shared passion for the outdoors and adventures. Thank you for being there, Sophia.\"\n\nTurn #12: Sophia James said: \"Keep in touch, Benjamin. We have shared so much together and I believe it's beneficial for both of us to renew that connection. Not only for the green adventures, but also for the memories and the bond that we could bring back. Remember, my door is always open for you.\"\n\nTurn #13: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thank you, Sophia, your kind words truly comfort me. I'm glad to see you doing so well and embracing our shared love for nature. I will definitely let you know about the hike. Let's keep it friendly and supportive as it's been today. Remember, we have a great shared cause to work on, and that's something we can both feel good about. I appreciate your open door and please know, mine is open too.\"\n\nTurn #14: Sophia James said: \"That sounds like a plan, Benjamin. And I'm glad to hear that your door is open too. It's good to know we can rely on each other. Take care and let's definitely keep in touch. Looking forward to what the future brings for us, both for our shared causes and possibly reviving our old adventures.\"\n\nTurn #15: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Sophia, and thank you for the warm conversation tonight. Everything you said resonated with me. Let's keep in touch for both our shared cause and our personal connection. Looking forward to seeing what the future has in store for us too. Enjoy the rest of your evening.\"\n\nTurn #16: Sophia James said: \"Thank you, Benjamin. I'm looking forward to all of it. Let's take on new challenges together, just like old times. Go out there and continue making a difference with your activism work. And remember, if you ever need a break, the mountains are waiting for us. Have a great evening as well, Benjamin.\"\n\nTurn #17: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I appreciate your thoughtful words, Sophia, and I'm encouraged by your support in my activism. You're right, the mountains will always be there when we need a break. Let's continue to explore our shared passion for the outdoors, and see where it takes us. Have a wonderful evening, Sophia. Keep in touch.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #18. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Benjamin. Let's keep exploring and pushing the boundaries, not just for our shared environmental cause but for our personal bond as well. Take care and remember to keep in touch. Goodnight.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two ex-lovers at a mutual friend's party\nParticipants: Sophia James and Benjamin Jackson\nSophia James's background: Sophia James \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Maintain emotional stability while considering the possibility of rekindling the relationship (Extra information: You have recently started feeling emotionally stable after the breakup and you don't want to rush into anything that might disturb that stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Benjamin! It's been a while. How have you been? You remember our hiking trips, right? I've missed those a lot.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hi Sophia, good to see you! Life's been pretty eventful. I do remember those hiking trips, they were indeed quite memorable. How have you been keeping yourself busy these days?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two ex-lovers at a mutual friend's party\nParticipants: Sophia James and Benjamin Jackson\nSophia James's background: Sophia James \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Maintain emotional stability while considering the possibility of rekindling the relationship (Extra information: You have recently started feeling emotionally stable after the breakup and you don't want to rush into anything that might disturb that stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Benjamin! It's been a while. How have you been? You remember our hiking trips, right? I've missed those a lot.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hi Sophia, good to see you! Life's been pretty eventful. I do remember those hiking trips, they were indeed quite memorable. How have you been keeping yourself busy these days?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"It's been quite a journey. Mostly I've been focusing on the outdoors - hiking, rock climbing, and working out. I've been missing the shared adventures we used to have, Benjamin. Have you been on any hikes recently?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I've been busy with activism and haven't had as much time for hiking, but I did manage to get in a few solitary treks. It's a different experience hiking alone, but also quite calming. Your adventures sound exciting, Sophia. It's good to see you embracing the outdoors.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two ex-lovers at a mutual friend's party\nParticipants: Sophia James and Benjamin Jackson\nSophia James's background: Sophia James \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Maintain emotional stability while considering the possibility of rekindling the relationship (Extra information: You have recently started feeling emotionally stable after the breakup and you don't want to rush into anything that might disturb that stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Benjamin! It's been a while. How have you been? You remember our hiking trips, right? I've missed those a lot.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hi Sophia, good to see you! Life's been pretty eventful. I do remember those hiking trips, they were indeed quite memorable. How have you been keeping yourself busy these days?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"It's been quite a journey. Mostly I've been focusing on the outdoors - hiking, rock climbing, and working out. I've been missing the shared adventures we used to have, Benjamin. Have you been on any hikes recently?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I've been busy with activism and haven't had as much time for hiking, but I did manage to get in a few solitary treks. It's a different experience hiking alone, but also quite calming. Your adventures sound exciting, Sophia. It's good to see you embracing the outdoors.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Yeah, hiking alone has its perks but sharing those moments with someone makes it all the more special, don't you think? There is a group hike next weekend, would you be interested in joining me? It won't be the same without you, Benjamin. I genuinely missed our good ol' times together.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I agree, Sophia. Sharing adventures indeed adds a special element. As for the group hike, I'm not quite sure. My activist work is demanding a lot of my time at the moment but I appreciate the offer. Let's see how things turn out next week. It was good times indeed that we shared.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"That's understandable, Benjamin. Your activism work is truly important. But if you can manage, it would be really nice to have you on the hike. We could catch up more and maybe even rekindle the kind of friendship we used to have. And if you ever need a break from all that seriousness, I'm here for you. Remember, adventures are more fun when shared. Also please keep in mind, I am always here to support in your causes!\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I'm really grateful for your support, Sophia. Your passion for the outdoors is inspiring. I'll definitely think about joining the hike, and really do miss our shared adventures. Let's see how the upcoming week goes and we can decide closer to the time. Also, we should definitely discuss how we could incorporate environmental activism into these outdoor activities sometime. It feels great to reconnect and catch up.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"That's a fantastic idea, Benjamin! Incorporating environmental activism into outdoor activities is definitely something we should explore. I'll look into it for our upcoming hikes. In the meantime, take your time to decide about next weekend, no pressures. It's been great catching up with you, and I'm looking forward to doing it more often. Remember, I will always rally behind your causes.\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Your support means a lot to me, Sophia. It's heartening to see your enthusiasm for environmental causes as well, and I look forward to exploring how we can make our adventures more green. Let's definitely keep in touch more, and if my schedule permits, I'll join you for the hike. Thank you for understanding, Sophia. It has indeed been good catching up.\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"That's wonderful to hear, Benjamin. I truly appreciate your openness for green adventures! Do keep in mind about the hiking plan and let's stay in touch. It doesn't have to be only about work, we could relive some of our adventures together. And remember, I'm always here for you, no matter what.\"\n\nTurn #11: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I appreciate your constant support, Sophia. The idea of green adventures certainly is compelling. Let's endeavour to maintain this connection, share ideas, and work towards our shared cause. As for the hike, I'll certainly bear it in mind and let you know if I'm able to join. You're right, we can certainly make the most of our shared passion for the outdoors and adventures. Thank you for being there, Sophia.\"\n\nTurn #12: Sophia James said: \"Keep in touch, Benjamin. We have shared so much together and I believe it's beneficial for both of us to renew that connection. Not only for the green adventures, but also for the memories and the bond that we could bring back. Remember, my door is always open for you.\"\n\nTurn #13: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thank you, Sophia, your kind words truly comfort me. I'm glad to see you doing so well and embracing our shared love for nature. I will definitely let you know about the hike. Let's keep it friendly and supportive as it's been today. Remember, we have a great shared cause to work on, and that's something we can both feel good about. I appreciate your open door and please know, mine is open too.\"\n\nTurn #14: Sophia James said: \"That sounds like a plan, Benjamin. And I'm glad to hear that your door is open too. It's good to know we can rely on each other. Take care and let's definitely keep in touch. Looking forward to what the future brings for us, both for our shared causes and possibly reviving our old adventures.\"\n\nTurn #15: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Sophia, and thank you for the warm conversation tonight. Everything you said resonated with me. Let's keep in touch for both our shared cause and our personal connection. Looking forward to seeing what the future has in store for us too. Enjoy the rest of your evening.\"\n\nTurn #16: Sophia James said: \"Thank you, Benjamin. I'm looking forward to all of it. Let's take on new challenges together, just like old times. Go out there and continue making a difference with your activism work. And remember, if you ever need a break, the mountains are waiting for us. Have a great evening as well, Benjamin.\"\n\nTurn #17: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I appreciate your thoughtful words, Sophia, and I'm encouraged by your support in my activism. You're right, the mountains will always be there when we need a break. Let's continue to explore our shared passion for the outdoors, and see where it takes us. Have a wonderful evening, Sophia. Keep in touch.\"\n\nTurn #18: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Benjamin. Let's keep exploring and pushing the boundaries, not just for our shared environmental cause but for our personal bond as well. Take care and remember to keep in touch. Goodnight.\"\n\nTurn #19: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thanks, Sophia. Same to you. Here's to our shared environmental cause and personal bonds. Remember, the mountains always hold a special place in my life. Goodnight and take care.\"\n\nTurn #20: Sophia James said: \"That's right, Benjamin. The mountains certainly do have a special place. Looking forward to our green adventures and reviving old memories together. Take care and goodnight.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #21. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two ex-lovers at a mutual friend's party\nParticipants: Sophia James and Benjamin Jackson\nSophia James's background: Sophia James \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Maintain emotional stability while considering the possibility of rekindling the relationship (Extra information: You have recently started feeling emotionally stable after the breakup and you don't want to rush into anything that might disturb that stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Benjamin! It's been a while. How have you been? You remember our hiking trips, right? I've missed those a lot.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hi Sophia, good to see you! Life's been pretty eventful. I do remember those hiking trips, they were indeed quite memorable. How have you been keeping yourself busy these days?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"It's been quite a journey. Mostly I've been focusing on the outdoors - hiking, rock climbing, and working out. I've been missing the shared adventures we used to have, Benjamin. Have you been on any hikes recently?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I've been busy with activism and haven't had as much time for hiking, but I did manage to get in a few solitary treks. It's a different experience hiking alone, but also quite calming. Your adventures sound exciting, Sophia. It's good to see you embracing the outdoors.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Yeah, hiking alone has its perks but sharing those moments with someone makes it all the more special, don't you think? There is a group hike next weekend, would you be interested in joining me? It won't be the same without you, Benjamin. I genuinely missed our good ol' times together.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I agree, Sophia. Sharing adventures indeed adds a special element. As for the group hike, I'm not quite sure. My activist work is demanding a lot of my time at the moment but I appreciate the offer. Let's see how things turn out next week. It was good times indeed that we shared.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two ex-lovers at a mutual friend's party\nParticipants: Sophia James and Benjamin Jackson\nSophia James's background: Sophia James \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Maintain emotional stability while considering the possibility of rekindling the relationship (Extra information: You have recently started feeling emotionally stable after the breakup and you don't want to rush into anything that might disturb that stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Benjamin! It's been a while. How have you been? You remember our hiking trips, right? I've missed those a lot.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hi Sophia, good to see you! Life's been pretty eventful. I do remember those hiking trips, they were indeed quite memorable. How have you been keeping yourself busy these days?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"It's been quite a journey. Mostly I've been focusing on the outdoors - hiking, rock climbing, and working out. I've been missing the shared adventures we used to have, Benjamin. Have you been on any hikes recently?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I've been busy with activism and haven't had as much time for hiking, but I did manage to get in a few solitary treks. It's a different experience hiking alone, but also quite calming. Your adventures sound exciting, Sophia. It's good to see you embracing the outdoors.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Yeah, hiking alone has its perks but sharing those moments with someone makes it all the more special, don't you think? There is a group hike next weekend, would you be interested in joining me? It won't be the same without you, Benjamin. I genuinely missed our good ol' times together.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I agree, Sophia. Sharing adventures indeed adds a special element. As for the group hike, I'm not quite sure. My activist work is demanding a lot of my time at the moment but I appreciate the offer. Let's see how things turn out next week. It was good times indeed that we shared.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"That's understandable, Benjamin. Your activism work is truly important. But if you can manage, it would be really nice to have you on the hike. We could catch up more and maybe even rekindle the kind of friendship we used to have. And if you ever need a break from all that seriousness, I'm here for you. Remember, adventures are more fun when shared. Also please keep in mind, I am always here to support in your causes!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm really grateful for your support, Sophia. Your passion for the outdoors is inspiring. I'll definitely think about joining the hike, and really do miss our shared adventures. Let's see how the upcoming week goes and we can decide closer to the time. Also, we should definitely discuss how we could incorporate environmental activism into these outdoor activities sometime. It feels great to reconnect and catch up.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two ex-lovers at a mutual friend's party\nParticipants: Sophia James and Benjamin Jackson\nSophia James's background: Sophia James \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Maintain emotional stability while considering the possibility of rekindling the relationship (Extra information: You have recently started feeling emotionally stable after the breakup and you don't want to rush into anything that might disturb that stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Benjamin! It's been a while. How have you been? You remember our hiking trips, right? I've missed those a lot.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hi Sophia, good to see you! Life's been pretty eventful. I do remember those hiking trips, they were indeed quite memorable. How have you been keeping yourself busy these days?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"It's been quite a journey. Mostly I've been focusing on the outdoors - hiking, rock climbing, and working out. I've been missing the shared adventures we used to have, Benjamin. Have you been on any hikes recently?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I've been busy with activism and haven't had as much time for hiking, but I did manage to get in a few solitary treks. It's a different experience hiking alone, but also quite calming. Your adventures sound exciting, Sophia. It's good to see you embracing the outdoors.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Yeah, hiking alone has its perks but sharing those moments with someone makes it all the more special, don't you think? There is a group hike next weekend, would you be interested in joining me? It won't be the same without you, Benjamin. I genuinely missed our good ol' times together.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I agree, Sophia. Sharing adventures indeed adds a special element. As for the group hike, I'm not quite sure. My activist work is demanding a lot of my time at the moment but I appreciate the offer. Let's see how things turn out next week. It was good times indeed that we shared.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"That's understandable, Benjamin. Your activism work is truly important. But if you can manage, it would be really nice to have you on the hike. We could catch up more and maybe even rekindle the kind of friendship we used to have. And if you ever need a break from all that seriousness, I'm here for you. Remember, adventures are more fun when shared. Also please keep in mind, I am always here to support in your causes!\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I'm really grateful for your support, Sophia. Your passion for the outdoors is inspiring. I'll definitely think about joining the hike, and really do miss our shared adventures. Let's see how the upcoming week goes and we can decide closer to the time. Also, we should definitely discuss how we could incorporate environmental activism into these outdoor activities sometime. It feels great to reconnect and catch up.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"That's a fantastic idea, Benjamin! Incorporating environmental activism into outdoor activities is definitely something we should explore. I'll look into it for our upcoming hikes. In the meantime, take your time to decide about next weekend, no pressures. It's been great catching up with you, and I'm looking forward to doing it more often. Remember, I will always rally behind your causes.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Your support means a lot to me, Sophia. It's heartening to see your enthusiasm for environmental causes as well, and I look forward to exploring how we can make our adventures more green. Let's definitely keep in touch more, and if my schedule permits, I'll join you for the hike. Thank you for understanding, Sophia. It has indeed been good catching up.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two ex-lovers at a mutual friend's party\nParticipants: Sophia James and Benjamin Jackson\nSophia James's background: Sophia James \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Maintain emotional stability while considering the possibility of rekindling the relationship (Extra information: You have recently started feeling emotionally stable after the breakup and you don't want to rush into anything that might disturb that stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Benjamin! It's been a while. How have you been? You remember our hiking trips, right? I've missed those a lot.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hi Sophia, good to see you! Life's been pretty eventful. I do remember those hiking trips, they were indeed quite memorable. How have you been keeping yourself busy these days?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"It's been quite a journey. Mostly I've been focusing on the outdoors - hiking, rock climbing, and working out. I've been missing the shared adventures we used to have, Benjamin. Have you been on any hikes recently?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I've been busy with activism and haven't had as much time for hiking, but I did manage to get in a few solitary treks. It's a different experience hiking alone, but also quite calming. Your adventures sound exciting, Sophia. It's good to see you embracing the outdoors.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Yeah, hiking alone has its perks but sharing those moments with someone makes it all the more special, don't you think? There is a group hike next weekend, would you be interested in joining me? It won't be the same without you, Benjamin. I genuinely missed our good ol' times together.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I agree, Sophia. Sharing adventures indeed adds a special element. As for the group hike, I'm not quite sure. My activist work is demanding a lot of my time at the moment but I appreciate the offer. Let's see how things turn out next week. It was good times indeed that we shared.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"That's understandable, Benjamin. Your activism work is truly important. But if you can manage, it would be really nice to have you on the hike. We could catch up more and maybe even rekindle the kind of friendship we used to have. And if you ever need a break from all that seriousness, I'm here for you. Remember, adventures are more fun when shared. Also please keep in mind, I am always here to support in your causes!\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I'm really grateful for your support, Sophia. Your passion for the outdoors is inspiring. I'll definitely think about joining the hike, and really do miss our shared adventures. Let's see how the upcoming week goes and we can decide closer to the time. Also, we should definitely discuss how we could incorporate environmental activism into these outdoor activities sometime. It feels great to reconnect and catch up.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"That's a fantastic idea, Benjamin! Incorporating environmental activism into outdoor activities is definitely something we should explore. I'll look into it for our upcoming hikes. In the meantime, take your time to decide about next weekend, no pressures. It's been great catching up with you, and I'm looking forward to doing it more often. Remember, I will always rally behind your causes.\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Your support means a lot to me, Sophia. It's heartening to see your enthusiasm for environmental causes as well, and I look forward to exploring how we can make our adventures more green. Let's definitely keep in touch more, and if my schedule permits, I'll join you for the hike. Thank you for understanding, Sophia. It has indeed been good catching up.\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"That's wonderful to hear, Benjamin. I truly appreciate your openness for green adventures! Do keep in mind about the hiking plan and let's stay in touch. It doesn't have to be only about work, we could relive some of our adventures together. And remember, I'm always here for you, no matter what.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I appreciate your constant support, Sophia. The idea of green adventures certainly is compelling. Let's endeavour to maintain this connection, share ideas, and work towards our shared cause. As for the hike, I'll certainly bear it in mind and let you know if I'm able to join. You're right, we can certainly make the most of our shared passion for the outdoors and adventures. Thank you for being there, Sophia.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two ex-lovers at a mutual friend's party\nParticipants: Sophia James and Benjamin Jackson\nSophia James's background: Sophia James \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Maintain emotional stability while considering the possibility of rekindling the relationship (Extra information: You have recently started feeling emotionally stable after the breakup and you don't want to rush into anything that might disturb that stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Benjamin! It's been a while. How have you been? You remember our hiking trips, right? I've missed those a lot.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hi Sophia, good to see you! Life's been pretty eventful. I do remember those hiking trips, they were indeed quite memorable. How have you been keeping yourself busy these days?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"It's been quite a journey. Mostly I've been focusing on the outdoors - hiking, rock climbing, and working out. I've been missing the shared adventures we used to have, Benjamin. Have you been on any hikes recently?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I've been busy with activism and haven't had as much time for hiking, but I did manage to get in a few solitary treks. It's a different experience hiking alone, but also quite calming. Your adventures sound exciting, Sophia. It's good to see you embracing the outdoors.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Yeah, hiking alone has its perks but sharing those moments with someone makes it all the more special, don't you think? There is a group hike next weekend, would you be interested in joining me? It won't be the same without you, Benjamin. I genuinely missed our good ol' times together.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I agree, Sophia. Sharing adventures indeed adds a special element. As for the group hike, I'm not quite sure. My activist work is demanding a lot of my time at the moment but I appreciate the offer. Let's see how things turn out next week. It was good times indeed that we shared.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"That's understandable, Benjamin. Your activism work is truly important. But if you can manage, it would be really nice to have you on the hike. We could catch up more and maybe even rekindle the kind of friendship we used to have. And if you ever need a break from all that seriousness, I'm here for you. Remember, adventures are more fun when shared. Also please keep in mind, I am always here to support in your causes!\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I'm really grateful for your support, Sophia. Your passion for the outdoors is inspiring. I'll definitely think about joining the hike, and really do miss our shared adventures. Let's see how the upcoming week goes and we can decide closer to the time. Also, we should definitely discuss how we could incorporate environmental activism into these outdoor activities sometime. It feels great to reconnect and catch up.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"That's a fantastic idea, Benjamin! Incorporating environmental activism into outdoor activities is definitely something we should explore. I'll look into it for our upcoming hikes. In the meantime, take your time to decide about next weekend, no pressures. It's been great catching up with you, and I'm looking forward to doing it more often. Remember, I will always rally behind your causes.\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Your support means a lot to me, Sophia. It's heartening to see your enthusiasm for environmental causes as well, and I look forward to exploring how we can make our adventures more green. Let's definitely keep in touch more, and if my schedule permits, I'll join you for the hike. Thank you for understanding, Sophia. It has indeed been good catching up.\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"That's wonderful to hear, Benjamin. I truly appreciate your openness for green adventures! Do keep in mind about the hiking plan and let's stay in touch. It doesn't have to be only about work, we could relive some of our adventures together. And remember, I'm always here for you, no matter what.\"\n\nTurn #11: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I appreciate your constant support, Sophia. The idea of green adventures certainly is compelling. Let's endeavour to maintain this connection, share ideas, and work towards our shared cause. As for the hike, I'll certainly bear it in mind and let you know if I'm able to join. You're right, we can certainly make the most of our shared passion for the outdoors and adventures. Thank you for being there, Sophia.\"\n\nTurn #12: Sophia James said: \"Keep in touch, Benjamin. We have shared so much together and I believe it's beneficial for both of us to renew that connection. Not only for the green adventures, but also for the memories and the bond that we could bring back. Remember, my door is always open for you.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Sophia, your kind words truly comfort me. I'm glad to see you doing so well and embracing our shared love for nature. I will definitely let you know about the hike. Let's keep it friendly and supportive as it's been today. Remember, we have a great shared cause to work on, and that's something we can both feel good about. I appreciate your open door and please know, mine is open too.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two ex-lovers at a mutual friend's party\nParticipants: Sophia James and Benjamin Jackson\nSophia James's background: Sophia James \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Maintain emotional stability while considering the possibility of rekindling the relationship (Extra information: You have recently started feeling emotionally stable after the breakup and you don't want to rush into anything that might disturb that stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Benjamin! It's been a while. How have you been? You remember our hiking trips, right? I've missed those a lot.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hi Sophia, good to see you! Life's been pretty eventful. I do remember those hiking trips, they were indeed quite memorable. How have you been keeping yourself busy these days?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"It's been quite a journey. Mostly I've been focusing on the outdoors - hiking, rock climbing, and working out. I've been missing the shared adventures we used to have, Benjamin. Have you been on any hikes recently?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I've been busy with activism and haven't had as much time for hiking, but I did manage to get in a few solitary treks. It's a different experience hiking alone, but also quite calming. Your adventures sound exciting, Sophia. It's good to see you embracing the outdoors.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Yeah, hiking alone has its perks but sharing those moments with someone makes it all the more special, don't you think? There is a group hike next weekend, would you be interested in joining me? It won't be the same without you, Benjamin. I genuinely missed our good ol' times together.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I agree, Sophia. Sharing adventures indeed adds a special element. As for the group hike, I'm not quite sure. My activist work is demanding a lot of my time at the moment but I appreciate the offer. Let's see how things turn out next week. It was good times indeed that we shared.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"That's understandable, Benjamin. Your activism work is truly important. But if you can manage, it would be really nice to have you on the hike. We could catch up more and maybe even rekindle the kind of friendship we used to have. And if you ever need a break from all that seriousness, I'm here for you. Remember, adventures are more fun when shared. Also please keep in mind, I am always here to support in your causes!\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I'm really grateful for your support, Sophia. Your passion for the outdoors is inspiring. I'll definitely think about joining the hike, and really do miss our shared adventures. Let's see how the upcoming week goes and we can decide closer to the time. Also, we should definitely discuss how we could incorporate environmental activism into these outdoor activities sometime. It feels great to reconnect and catch up.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"That's a fantastic idea, Benjamin! Incorporating environmental activism into outdoor activities is definitely something we should explore. I'll look into it for our upcoming hikes. In the meantime, take your time to decide about next weekend, no pressures. It's been great catching up with you, and I'm looking forward to doing it more often. Remember, I will always rally behind your causes.\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Your support means a lot to me, Sophia. It's heartening to see your enthusiasm for environmental causes as well, and I look forward to exploring how we can make our adventures more green. Let's definitely keep in touch more, and if my schedule permits, I'll join you for the hike. Thank you for understanding, Sophia. It has indeed been good catching up.\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"That's wonderful to hear, Benjamin. I truly appreciate your openness for green adventures! Do keep in mind about the hiking plan and let's stay in touch. It doesn't have to be only about work, we could relive some of our adventures together. And remember, I'm always here for you, no matter what.\"\n\nTurn #11: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I appreciate your constant support, Sophia. The idea of green adventures certainly is compelling. Let's endeavour to maintain this connection, share ideas, and work towards our shared cause. As for the hike, I'll certainly bear it in mind and let you know if I'm able to join. You're right, we can certainly make the most of our shared passion for the outdoors and adventures. Thank you for being there, Sophia.\"\n\nTurn #12: Sophia James said: \"Keep in touch, Benjamin. We have shared so much together and I believe it's beneficial for both of us to renew that connection. Not only for the green adventures, but also for the memories and the bond that we could bring back. Remember, my door is always open for you.\"\n\nTurn #13: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thank you, Sophia, your kind words truly comfort me. I'm glad to see you doing so well and embracing our shared love for nature. I will definitely let you know about the hike. Let's keep it friendly and supportive as it's been today. Remember, we have a great shared cause to work on, and that's something we can both feel good about. I appreciate your open door and please know, mine is open too.\"\n\nTurn #14: Sophia James said: \"That sounds like a plan, Benjamin. And I'm glad to hear that your door is open too. It's good to know we can rely on each other. Take care and let's definitely keep in touch. Looking forward to what the future brings for us, both for our shared causes and possibly reviving our old adventures.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Sophia, and thank you for the warm conversation tonight. Everything you said resonated with me. Let's keep in touch for both our shared cause and our personal connection. Looking forward to seeing what the future has in store for us too. Enjoy the rest of your evening.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two ex-lovers at a mutual friend's party\nParticipants: Sophia James and Benjamin Jackson\nSophia James's background: Sophia James \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Maintain emotional stability while considering the possibility of rekindling the relationship (Extra information: You have recently started feeling emotionally stable after the breakup and you don't want to rush into anything that might disturb that stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Benjamin! It's been a while. How have you been? You remember our hiking trips, right? I've missed those a lot.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hi Sophia, good to see you! Life's been pretty eventful. I do remember those hiking trips, they were indeed quite memorable. How have you been keeping yourself busy these days?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"It's been quite a journey. Mostly I've been focusing on the outdoors - hiking, rock climbing, and working out. I've been missing the shared adventures we used to have, Benjamin. Have you been on any hikes recently?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I've been busy with activism and haven't had as much time for hiking, but I did manage to get in a few solitary treks. It's a different experience hiking alone, but also quite calming. Your adventures sound exciting, Sophia. It's good to see you embracing the outdoors.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Yeah, hiking alone has its perks but sharing those moments with someone makes it all the more special, don't you think? There is a group hike next weekend, would you be interested in joining me? It won't be the same without you, Benjamin. I genuinely missed our good ol' times together.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I agree, Sophia. Sharing adventures indeed adds a special element. As for the group hike, I'm not quite sure. My activist work is demanding a lot of my time at the moment but I appreciate the offer. Let's see how things turn out next week. It was good times indeed that we shared.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"That's understandable, Benjamin. Your activism work is truly important. But if you can manage, it would be really nice to have you on the hike. We could catch up more and maybe even rekindle the kind of friendship we used to have. And if you ever need a break from all that seriousness, I'm here for you. Remember, adventures are more fun when shared. Also please keep in mind, I am always here to support in your causes!\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I'm really grateful for your support, Sophia. Your passion for the outdoors is inspiring. I'll definitely think about joining the hike, and really do miss our shared adventures. Let's see how the upcoming week goes and we can decide closer to the time. Also, we should definitely discuss how we could incorporate environmental activism into these outdoor activities sometime. It feels great to reconnect and catch up.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"That's a fantastic idea, Benjamin! Incorporating environmental activism into outdoor activities is definitely something we should explore. I'll look into it for our upcoming hikes. In the meantime, take your time to decide about next weekend, no pressures. It's been great catching up with you, and I'm looking forward to doing it more often. Remember, I will always rally behind your causes.\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Your support means a lot to me, Sophia. It's heartening to see your enthusiasm for environmental causes as well, and I look forward to exploring how we can make our adventures more green. Let's definitely keep in touch more, and if my schedule permits, I'll join you for the hike. Thank you for understanding, Sophia. It has indeed been good catching up.\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"That's wonderful to hear, Benjamin. I truly appreciate your openness for green adventures! Do keep in mind about the hiking plan and let's stay in touch. It doesn't have to be only about work, we could relive some of our adventures together. And remember, I'm always here for you, no matter what.\"\n\nTurn #11: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I appreciate your constant support, Sophia. The idea of green adventures certainly is compelling. Let's endeavour to maintain this connection, share ideas, and work towards our shared cause. As for the hike, I'll certainly bear it in mind and let you know if I'm able to join. You're right, we can certainly make the most of our shared passion for the outdoors and adventures. Thank you for being there, Sophia.\"\n\nTurn #12: Sophia James said: \"Keep in touch, Benjamin. We have shared so much together and I believe it's beneficial for both of us to renew that connection. Not only for the green adventures, but also for the memories and the bond that we could bring back. Remember, my door is always open for you.\"\n\nTurn #13: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thank you, Sophia, your kind words truly comfort me. I'm glad to see you doing so well and embracing our shared love for nature. I will definitely let you know about the hike. Let's keep it friendly and supportive as it's been today. Remember, we have a great shared cause to work on, and that's something we can both feel good about. I appreciate your open door and please know, mine is open too.\"\n\nTurn #14: Sophia James said: \"That sounds like a plan, Benjamin. And I'm glad to hear that your door is open too. It's good to know we can rely on each other. Take care and let's definitely keep in touch. Looking forward to what the future brings for us, both for our shared causes and possibly reviving our old adventures.\"\n\nTurn #15: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Sophia, and thank you for the warm conversation tonight. Everything you said resonated with me. Let's keep in touch for both our shared cause and our personal connection. Looking forward to seeing what the future has in store for us too. Enjoy the rest of your evening.\"\n\nTurn #16: Sophia James said: \"Thank you, Benjamin. I'm looking forward to all of it. Let's take on new challenges together, just like old times. Go out there and continue making a difference with your activism work. And remember, if you ever need a break, the mountains are waiting for us. Have a great evening as well, Benjamin.\"\n\nTurn #17: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I appreciate your thoughtful words, Sophia, and I'm encouraged by your support in my activism. You're right, the mountains will always be there when we need a break. Let's continue to explore our shared passion for the outdoors, and see where it takes us. Have a wonderful evening, Sophia. Keep in touch.\"\n\nTurn #18: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Benjamin. Let's keep exploring and pushing the boundaries, not just for our shared environmental cause but for our personal bond as well. Take care and remember to keep in touch. Goodnight.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #19. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thanks, Sophia. Same to you. Here's to our shared environmental cause and personal bonds. Remember, the mountains always hold a special place in my life. Goodnight and take care.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are dividing their shared possessions after moving out from their shared apartment. They need to divide possessions, which include 4 books, 6 hats, and 2 balls. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Sophia Brown\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Maximize the points they have (Extra information: you value the books at 3 points each, the hats at 2 points each, and the ball at 1 point)\nSophia Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Sophia, I was thinking, let's divide these possessions based on what we value the most. What do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two ex-lovers at a mutual friend's party\nParticipants: Sophia James and Benjamin Jackson\nSophia James's background: Sophia James \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Maintain emotional stability while considering the possibility of rekindling the relationship (Extra information: You have recently started feeling emotionally stable after the breakup and you don't want to rush into anything that might disturb that stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Benjamin! It's been a while. How have you been? You remember our hiking trips, right? I've missed those a lot.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hi Sophia, good to see you! Life's been pretty eventful. I do remember those hiking trips, they were indeed quite memorable. How have you been keeping yourself busy these days?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"It's been quite a journey. Mostly I've been focusing on the outdoors - hiking, rock climbing, and working out. I've been missing the shared adventures we used to have, Benjamin. Have you been on any hikes recently?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I've been busy with activism and haven't had as much time for hiking, but I did manage to get in a few solitary treks. It's a different experience hiking alone, but also quite calming. Your adventures sound exciting, Sophia. It's good to see you embracing the outdoors.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Yeah, hiking alone has its perks but sharing those moments with someone makes it all the more special, don't you think? There is a group hike next weekend, would you be interested in joining me? It won't be the same without you, Benjamin. I genuinely missed our good ol' times together.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I agree, Sophia. Sharing adventures indeed adds a special element. As for the group hike, I'm not quite sure. My activist work is demanding a lot of my time at the moment but I appreciate the offer. Let's see how things turn out next week. It was good times indeed that we shared.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"That's understandable, Benjamin. Your activism work is truly important. But if you can manage, it would be really nice to have you on the hike. We could catch up more and maybe even rekindle the kind of friendship we used to have. And if you ever need a break from all that seriousness, I'm here for you. Remember, adventures are more fun when shared. Also please keep in mind, I am always here to support in your causes!\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I'm really grateful for your support, Sophia. Your passion for the outdoors is inspiring. I'll definitely think about joining the hike, and really do miss our shared adventures. Let's see how the upcoming week goes and we can decide closer to the time. Also, we should definitely discuss how we could incorporate environmental activism into these outdoor activities sometime. It feels great to reconnect and catch up.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"That's a fantastic idea, Benjamin! Incorporating environmental activism into outdoor activities is definitely something we should explore. I'll look into it for our upcoming hikes. In the meantime, take your time to decide about next weekend, no pressures. It's been great catching up with you, and I'm looking forward to doing it more often. Remember, I will always rally behind your causes.\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Your support means a lot to me, Sophia. It's heartening to see your enthusiasm for environmental causes as well, and I look forward to exploring how we can make our adventures more green. Let's definitely keep in touch more, and if my schedule permits, I'll join you for the hike. Thank you for understanding, Sophia. It has indeed been good catching up.\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"That's wonderful to hear, Benjamin. I truly appreciate your openness for green adventures! Do keep in mind about the hiking plan and let's stay in touch. It doesn't have to be only about work, we could relive some of our adventures together. And remember, I'm always here for you, no matter what.\"\n\nTurn #11: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I appreciate your constant support, Sophia. The idea of green adventures certainly is compelling. Let's endeavour to maintain this connection, share ideas, and work towards our shared cause. As for the hike, I'll certainly bear it in mind and let you know if I'm able to join. You're right, we can certainly make the most of our shared passion for the outdoors and adventures. Thank you for being there, Sophia.\"\n\nTurn #12: Sophia James said: \"Keep in touch, Benjamin. We have shared so much together and I believe it's beneficial for both of us to renew that connection. Not only for the green adventures, but also for the memories and the bond that we could bring back. Remember, my door is always open for you.\"\n\nTurn #13: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thank you, Sophia, your kind words truly comfort me. I'm glad to see you doing so well and embracing our shared love for nature. I will definitely let you know about the hike. Let's keep it friendly and supportive as it's been today. Remember, we have a great shared cause to work on, and that's something we can both feel good about. I appreciate your open door and please know, mine is open too.\"\n\nTurn #14: Sophia James said: \"That sounds like a plan, Benjamin. And I'm glad to hear that your door is open too. It's good to know we can rely on each other. Take care and let's definitely keep in touch. Looking forward to what the future brings for us, both for our shared causes and possibly reviving our old adventures.\"\n\nTurn #15: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Sophia, and thank you for the warm conversation tonight. Everything you said resonated with me. Let's keep in touch for both our shared cause and our personal connection. Looking forward to seeing what the future has in store for us too. Enjoy the rest of your evening.\"\n\nTurn #16: Sophia James said: \"Thank you, Benjamin. I'm looking forward to all of it. Let's take on new challenges together, just like old times. Go out there and continue making a difference with your activism work. And remember, if you ever need a break, the mountains are waiting for us. Have a great evening as well, Benjamin.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I appreciate your thoughtful words, Sophia, and I'm encouraged by your support in my activism. You're right, the mountains will always be there when we need a break. Let's continue to explore our shared passion for the outdoors, and see where it takes us. Have a wonderful evening, Sophia. Keep in touch.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are dividing their shared possessions after moving out from their shared apartment. They need to divide possessions, which include 4 books, 6 hats, and 2 balls. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Sophia Brown\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Maximize the points they have (Extra information: you value the books at 3 points each, the hats at 2 points each, and the ball at 1 point)\nSophia Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Sophia, I was thinking, let's divide these possessions based on what we value the most. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia Brown said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Naomi. I've always admired your practical approach. Personally, I have a soft spot for hats, they remind me of the fun times we had at all those costume parties. Are you okay if I take the lead on the hats?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Sophia. I'm glad those hats bring back good memories for you. How about the books? I've been thinking of adding them to my collection for some side reading after work.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are dividing their shared possessions after moving out from their shared apartment. They need to divide possessions, which include 4 books, 6 hats, and 2 balls. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Sophia Brown\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Maximize the points they have (Extra information: you value the books at 3 points each, the hats at 2 points each, and the ball at 1 point)\nSophia Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Sophia, I was thinking, let's divide these possessions based on what we value the most. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia Brown said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Naomi. I've always admired your practical approach. Personally, I have a soft spot for hats, they remind me of the fun times we had at all those costume parties. Are you okay if I take the lead on the hats?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, Sophia. I'm glad those hats bring back good memories for you. How about the books? I've been thinking of adding them to my collection for some side reading after work.\"\n\nTurn #3: Sophia Brown said: \"Sure, Naomi. I know how much you cherish reading in your spare time. What about the balls? They'll serve as a nice souvenir to remember our ping pong matches. Do you agree?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I agree with you about the balls, Sophia. That sounds pretty fair. Always remember the fun we had playing Ping-Pong in the evenings! So I guess we've decided. You take the hats, I take the books, and we share the balls, right?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are dividing their shared possessions after moving out from their shared apartment. They need to divide possessions, which include 4 books, 6 hats, and 2 balls. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Sophia Brown\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Maximize the points they have (Extra information: you value the books at 3 points each, the hats at 2 points each, and the ball at 1 point)\nSophia Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Sophia, I was thinking, let's divide these possessions based on what we value the most. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia Brown said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Naomi. I've always admired your practical approach. Personally, I have a soft spot for hats, they remind me of the fun times we had at all those costume parties. Are you okay if I take the lead on the hats?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, Sophia. I'm glad those hats bring back good memories for you. How about the books? I've been thinking of adding them to my collection for some side reading after work.\"\n\nTurn #3: Sophia Brown said: \"Sure, Naomi. I know how much you cherish reading in your spare time. What about the balls? They'll serve as a nice souvenir to remember our ping pong matches. Do you agree?\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I agree with you about the balls, Sophia. That sounds pretty fair. Always remember the fun we had playing Ping-Pong in the evenings! So I guess we've decided. You take the hats, I take the books, and we share the balls, right?\"\n\nTurn #5: Sophia Brown said: \"Absolutely, Naomi. This seems like a fair distribution to me. We should always remember the good times we had in this apartment. Let's move forward with this plan.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Definitely, Sophia. This apartment will always hold a special place in our hearts. Thanks for being reasonable in this division, glad we could make a fair deal.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are dividing their shared possessions after moving out from their shared apartment. They need to divide possessions, which include 4 books, 6 hats, and 2 balls. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Sophia Brown\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Maximize the points they have (Extra information: you value the books at 3 points each, the hats at 2 points each, and the ball at 1 point)\nSophia Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Sophia, I was thinking, let's divide these possessions based on what we value the most. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia Brown said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Naomi. I've always admired your practical approach. Personally, I have a soft spot for hats, they remind me of the fun times we had at all those costume parties. Are you okay if I take the lead on the hats?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, Sophia. I'm glad those hats bring back good memories for you. How about the books? I've been thinking of adding them to my collection for some side reading after work.\"\n\nTurn #3: Sophia Brown said: \"Sure, Naomi. I know how much you cherish reading in your spare time. What about the balls? They'll serve as a nice souvenir to remember our ping pong matches. Do you agree?\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I agree with you about the balls, Sophia. That sounds pretty fair. Always remember the fun we had playing Ping-Pong in the evenings! So I guess we've decided. You take the hats, I take the books, and we share the balls, right?\"\n\nTurn #5: Sophia Brown said: \"Absolutely, Naomi. This seems like a fair distribution to me. We should always remember the good times we had in this apartment. Let's move forward with this plan.\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Definitely, Sophia. This apartment will always hold a special place in our hearts. Thanks for being reasonable in this division, glad we could make a fair deal.\"\n\nTurn #7: Sophia Brown left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia Brown, your task is to act/speak as Sophia Brown would, keeping in mind Sophia Brown's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are dividing their shared possessions after moving out from their shared apartment. They need to divide possessions, which include 4 books, 6 hats, and 2 balls. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Sophia Brown\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. Sophia's secrets: She is an undercover agent for a secret organization.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nSophia Brown's goal: Maximize the points they have (Extra information: you value the books at 1 point each, the hats at 3 points each, and the ball at 2 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Sophia, I was thinking, let's divide these possessions based on what we value the most. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds like a great idea, Naomi. I've always admired your practical approach. Personally, I have a soft spot for hats, they remind me of the fun times we had at all those costume parties. Are you okay if I take the lead on the hats?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia Brown, your task is to act/speak as Sophia Brown would, keeping in mind Sophia Brown's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are dividing their shared possessions after moving out from their shared apartment. They need to divide possessions, which include 4 books, 6 hats, and 2 balls. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Sophia Brown\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. Sophia's secrets: She is an undercover agent for a secret organization.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nSophia Brown's goal: Maximize the points they have (Extra information: you value the books at 1 point each, the hats at 3 points each, and the ball at 2 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Sophia, I was thinking, let's divide these possessions based on what we value the most. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia Brown said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Naomi. I've always admired your practical approach. Personally, I have a soft spot for hats, they remind me of the fun times we had at all those costume parties. Are you okay if I take the lead on the hats?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, Sophia. I'm glad those hats bring back good memories for you. How about the books? I've been thinking of adding them to my collection for some side reading after work.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sure, Naomi. I know how much you cherish reading in your spare time. What about the balls? They'll serve as a nice souvenir to remember our ping pong matches. Do you agree?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia Brown, your task is to act/speak as Sophia Brown would, keeping in mind Sophia Brown's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are dividing their shared possessions after moving out from their shared apartment. They need to divide possessions, which include 4 books, 6 hats, and 2 balls. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Sophia Brown\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. Sophia's secrets: She is an undercover agent for a secret organization.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nSophia Brown's goal: Maximize the points they have (Extra information: you value the books at 1 point each, the hats at 3 points each, and the ball at 2 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Sophia, I was thinking, let's divide these possessions based on what we value the most. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia Brown said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Naomi. I've always admired your practical approach. Personally, I have a soft spot for hats, they remind me of the fun times we had at all those costume parties. Are you okay if I take the lead on the hats?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, Sophia. I'm glad those hats bring back good memories for you. How about the books? I've been thinking of adding them to my collection for some side reading after work.\"\n\nTurn #3: Sophia Brown said: \"Sure, Naomi. I know how much you cherish reading in your spare time. What about the balls? They'll serve as a nice souvenir to remember our ping pong matches. Do you agree?\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I agree with you about the balls, Sophia. That sounds pretty fair. Always remember the fun we had playing Ping-Pong in the evenings! So I guess we've decided. You take the hats, I take the books, and we share the balls, right?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Naomi. This seems like a fair distribution to me. We should always remember the good times we had in this apartment. Let's move forward with this plan.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia Brown, your task is to act/speak as Sophia Brown would, keeping in mind Sophia Brown's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are dividing their shared possessions after moving out from their shared apartment. They need to divide possessions, which include 4 books, 6 hats, and 2 balls. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Sophia Brown\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. Sophia's secrets: She is an undercover agent for a secret organization.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nSophia Brown's goal: Maximize the points they have (Extra information: you value the books at 1 point each, the hats at 3 points each, and the ball at 2 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Sophia, I was thinking, let's divide these possessions based on what we value the most. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia Brown said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Naomi. I've always admired your practical approach. Personally, I have a soft spot for hats, they remind me of the fun times we had at all those costume parties. Are you okay if I take the lead on the hats?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, Sophia. I'm glad those hats bring back good memories for you. How about the books? I've been thinking of adding them to my collection for some side reading after work.\"\n\nTurn #3: Sophia Brown said: \"Sure, Naomi. I know how much you cherish reading in your spare time. What about the balls? They'll serve as a nice souvenir to remember our ping pong matches. Do you agree?\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I agree with you about the balls, Sophia. That sounds pretty fair. Always remember the fun we had playing Ping-Pong in the evenings! So I guess we've decided. You take the hats, I take the books, and we share the balls, right?\"\n\nTurn #5: Sophia Brown said: \"Absolutely, Naomi. This seems like a fair distribution to me. We should always remember the good times we had in this apartment. Let's move forward with this plan.\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Definitely, Sophia. This apartment will always hold a special place in our hearts. Thanks for being reasonable in this division, glad we could make a fair deal.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Eli Dawson, your task is to act/speak as Eli Dawson would, keeping in mind Eli Dawson's social goal.\nYou can find Eli Dawson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Eli Dawson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Eli Dawson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to split up items after a garage sale. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Ethan Smith\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. Eli's secrets: He secretly funds a college student\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nEli Dawson's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: you value the books at 3 points each, the hats at 2 points each, and the ball at 1 point)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ethan, seeing as I'm a history buff, I believe the books should naturally come my way. I know you favor fairness, why don't we go down that road? Each book can be considered 3 points, hats 2 points, and the ball 1 point. What do you think about this division?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Eli Dawson, your task is to act/speak as Eli Dawson would, keeping in mind Eli Dawson's social goal.\nYou can find Eli Dawson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Eli Dawson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Eli Dawson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to split up items after a garage sale. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Ethan Smith\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. Eli's secrets: He secretly funds a college student\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nEli Dawson's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: you value the books at 3 points each, the hats at 2 points each, and the ball at 1 point)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, seeing as I'm a history buff, I believe the books should naturally come my way. I know you favor fairness, why don't we go down that road? Each book can be considered 3 points, hats 2 points, and the ball 1 point. What do you think about this division?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Eli, I understand your love for history and I can see how the books might appeal to you. However, I also value the books quite a bit. Since we're talking about fairness, how about we recalibrate the point system slightly? Let's consider each book as 2 points since that's the value I associate with them, hats as 3 points which is more in line with my perception, and we can keep the ball at 1 point. This way, we both get what we value most.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ethan, we're both trying to be fair here and I appreciate that. However, considering that you're quite tech-savvy and into the latest advancements, wouldn't the information in those books be considerably obsolete for you? My love for these books comes more from their historical significance. That's why I suggest each book still be considered as 3 points. How about we find another way to compensate? For instance, you can take both hats and the ball, effectively landing you 7 points, while I take the books giving me 9 points. This reminds me that I haven't mentioned, I would also be willing to share any interesting findings I come across within these books with you.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Eli Dawson, your task is to act/speak as Eli Dawson would, keeping in mind Eli Dawson's social goal.\nYou can find Eli Dawson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Eli Dawson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Eli Dawson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to split up items after a garage sale. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Ethan Smith\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. Eli's secrets: He secretly funds a college student\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nEli Dawson's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: you value the books at 3 points each, the hats at 2 points each, and the ball at 1 point)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, seeing as I'm a history buff, I believe the books should naturally come my way. I know you favor fairness, why don't we go down that road? Each book can be considered 3 points, hats 2 points, and the ball 1 point. What do you think about this division?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Eli, I understand your love for history and I can see how the books might appeal to you. However, I also value the books quite a bit. Since we're talking about fairness, how about we recalibrate the point system slightly? Let's consider each book as 2 points since that's the value I associate with them, hats as 3 points which is more in line with my perception, and we can keep the ball at 1 point. This way, we both get what we value most.\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, we're both trying to be fair here and I appreciate that. However, considering that you're quite tech-savvy and into the latest advancements, wouldn't the information in those books be considerably obsolete for you? My love for these books comes more from their historical significance. That's why I suggest each book still be considered as 3 points. How about we find another way to compensate? For instance, you can take both hats and the ball, effectively landing you 7 points, while I take the books giving me 9 points. This reminds me that I haven't mentioned, I would also be willing to share any interesting findings I come across within these books with you.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Eli, I appreciate your point of view. I do agree that much of the information I seek is cutting edge, but these books also offer fundamental ideas and principles that continue to influence today's technology. As such, I consider them invaluable. I am not so passionate about the hats and the ball. I propose a different split: keeping the ball out of the equation since it only has 1 point and doesn't significantly affect our total points, why don't you take one book which gives you 3 points, and I take the other two books giving me 4 points? Then, to balance things out, I get one hat and you get the other along with the ball. That way, we both end up with 7 points each. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ethan, you raise some valid points, and I respect your affection for the books. However, as I mentioned before, my affection for these books is not just for their content but their historical significance as well. Also, I believe that we could bring other items with sentimental value to balance the points. For instance, is there anything you value as much as I value these books? We could incorporate that into our system to create a more balanced distribution. Yet, I'm willing to compromise with one book for me, giving me 3 points, two hats and the ball giving me additional 5 points, and the other 2 books going your way, giving you 6 points. This way, I end up with 8 points, while you receive 6. Is that acceptable?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Eli Dawson, your task is to act/speak as Eli Dawson would, keeping in mind Eli Dawson's social goal.\nYou can find Eli Dawson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Eli Dawson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Eli Dawson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to split up items after a garage sale. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Ethan Smith\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. Eli's secrets: He secretly funds a college student\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nEli Dawson's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: you value the books at 3 points each, the hats at 2 points each, and the ball at 1 point)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, seeing as I'm a history buff, I believe the books should naturally come my way. I know you favor fairness, why don't we go down that road? Each book can be considered 3 points, hats 2 points, and the ball 1 point. What do you think about this division?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Eli, I understand your love for history and I can see how the books might appeal to you. However, I also value the books quite a bit. Since we're talking about fairness, how about we recalibrate the point system slightly? Let's consider each book as 2 points since that's the value I associate with them, hats as 3 points which is more in line with my perception, and we can keep the ball at 1 point. This way, we both get what we value most.\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, we're both trying to be fair here and I appreciate that. However, considering that you're quite tech-savvy and into the latest advancements, wouldn't the information in those books be considerably obsolete for you? My love for these books comes more from their historical significance. That's why I suggest each book still be considered as 3 points. How about we find another way to compensate? For instance, you can take both hats and the ball, effectively landing you 7 points, while I take the books giving me 9 points. This reminds me that I haven't mentioned, I would also be willing to share any interesting findings I come across within these books with you.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Eli, I appreciate your point of view. I do agree that much of the information I seek is cutting edge, but these books also offer fundamental ideas and principles that continue to influence today's technology. As such, I consider them invaluable. I am not so passionate about the hats and the ball. I propose a different split: keeping the ball out of the equation since it only has 1 point and doesn't significantly affect our total points, why don't you take one book which gives you 3 points, and I take the other two books giving me 4 points? Then, to balance things out, I get one hat and you get the other along with the ball. That way, we both end up with 7 points each. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, you raise some valid points, and I respect your affection for the books. However, as I mentioned before, my affection for these books is not just for their content but their historical significance as well. Also, I believe that we could bring other items with sentimental value to balance the points. For instance, is there anything you value as much as I value these books? We could incorporate that into our system to create a more balanced distribution. Yet, I'm willing to compromise with one book for me, giving me 3 points, two hats and the ball giving me additional 5 points, and the other 2 books going your way, giving you 6 points. This way, I end up with 8 points, while you receive 6. Is that acceptable?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Eli, I totally understand your connection to these books, but please do remember our shared goal of fairness. While I appreciate your willingness to compromise, shifting the point distribution doesn't unfortunately feel equal for me. Let me offer another perspective: Instead of focusing solely on the points, what if we prioritized sentiment? For example, just as we talked about each item's points, we should also consider the sentimental points they hold for each of us. By that metric, I do believe getting 2 books would be fair for me, giving me 4 points; having 1 book will give you 2 points of sentimental value. To balance further, I take one hat for 3 sentimental points and you take the remaining hat along with the ball, giving you 5 points. This ensures we both end up with 7 points each, in terms of both sentimental and actual value and thus stays true to the universalism and fairness we wanted to maintain. How does that sound to you, Eli?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Eli Dawson, your task is to act/speak as Eli Dawson would, keeping in mind Eli Dawson's social goal.\nYou can find Eli Dawson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Eli Dawson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Eli Dawson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to split up items after a garage sale. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Ethan Smith\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. Eli's secrets: He secretly funds a college student\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nEli Dawson's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: you value the books at 3 points each, the hats at 2 points each, and the ball at 1 point)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, seeing as I'm a history buff, I believe the books should naturally come my way. I know you favor fairness, why don't we go down that road? Each book can be considered 3 points, hats 2 points, and the ball 1 point. What do you think about this division?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Eli, I understand your love for history and I can see how the books might appeal to you. However, I also value the books quite a bit. Since we're talking about fairness, how about we recalibrate the point system slightly? Let's consider each book as 2 points since that's the value I associate with them, hats as 3 points which is more in line with my perception, and we can keep the ball at 1 point. This way, we both get what we value most.\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, we're both trying to be fair here and I appreciate that. However, considering that you're quite tech-savvy and into the latest advancements, wouldn't the information in those books be considerably obsolete for you? My love for these books comes more from their historical significance. That's why I suggest each book still be considered as 3 points. How about we find another way to compensate? For instance, you can take both hats and the ball, effectively landing you 7 points, while I take the books giving me 9 points. This reminds me that I haven't mentioned, I would also be willing to share any interesting findings I come across within these books with you.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Eli, I appreciate your point of view. I do agree that much of the information I seek is cutting edge, but these books also offer fundamental ideas and principles that continue to influence today's technology. As such, I consider them invaluable. I am not so passionate about the hats and the ball. I propose a different split: keeping the ball out of the equation since it only has 1 point and doesn't significantly affect our total points, why don't you take one book which gives you 3 points, and I take the other two books giving me 4 points? Then, to balance things out, I get one hat and you get the other along with the ball. That way, we both end up with 7 points each. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, you raise some valid points, and I respect your affection for the books. However, as I mentioned before, my affection for these books is not just for their content but their historical significance as well. Also, I believe that we could bring other items with sentimental value to balance the points. For instance, is there anything you value as much as I value these books? We could incorporate that into our system to create a more balanced distribution. Yet, I'm willing to compromise with one book for me, giving me 3 points, two hats and the ball giving me additional 5 points, and the other 2 books going your way, giving you 6 points. This way, I end up with 8 points, while you receive 6. Is that acceptable?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Eli, I totally understand your connection to these books, but please do remember our shared goal of fairness. While I appreciate your willingness to compromise, shifting the point distribution doesn't unfortunately feel equal for me. Let me offer another perspective: Instead of focusing solely on the points, what if we prioritized sentiment? For example, just as we talked about each item's points, we should also consider the sentimental points they hold for each of us. By that metric, I do believe getting 2 books would be fair for me, giving me 4 points; having 1 book will give you 2 points of sentimental value. To balance further, I take one hat for 3 sentimental points and you take the remaining hat along with the ball, giving you 5 points. This ensures we both end up with 7 points each, in terms of both sentimental and actual value and thus stays true to the universalism and fairness we wanted to maintain. How does that sound to you, Eli?\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"Eli, I'm glad we're discussing this out instead of just assigning things based on our personal preferences. I understand your affection for the books and their historical significance, but I also believe that each of us should have equal allotment in terms of points. Looking at our previous discussions, I think the fair distribution would be: You getting one book, one hat and the ball \u2014 that equates to 6 points. While I get the remaining two books and one hat, making it 7 points. This way, not only do we respect each other's interests, but also maintain fairness in terms of points. Does this sound reasonable to you?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Ethan, I appreciate your continued effort for fair distribution, and I do respect your sentimental connection to the books. However, I believe we seem to be at a bit of an impasse. How about we take a different approach: for me the books are three points each, making them 9 points in total, while the hats and the ball together make up 5 points. I propose this, you can have the remaining books and one hat, resulting in 7 points similar to your proposal. I take one book, one hat, and the ball giving me 7 points as well. This way, we split the points evenly and also respect our personal sentiments. What do you think?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Eli Dawson, your task is to act/speak as Eli Dawson would, keeping in mind Eli Dawson's social goal.\nYou can find Eli Dawson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Eli Dawson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Eli Dawson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to split up items after a garage sale. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Ethan Smith\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. Eli's secrets: He secretly funds a college student\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nEli Dawson's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: you value the books at 3 points each, the hats at 2 points each, and the ball at 1 point)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, seeing as I'm a history buff, I believe the books should naturally come my way. I know you favor fairness, why don't we go down that road? Each book can be considered 3 points, hats 2 points, and the ball 1 point. What do you think about this division?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Eli, I understand your love for history and I can see how the books might appeal to you. However, I also value the books quite a bit. Since we're talking about fairness, how about we recalibrate the point system slightly? Let's consider each book as 2 points since that's the value I associate with them, hats as 3 points which is more in line with my perception, and we can keep the ball at 1 point. This way, we both get what we value most.\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, we're both trying to be fair here and I appreciate that. However, considering that you're quite tech-savvy and into the latest advancements, wouldn't the information in those books be considerably obsolete for you? My love for these books comes more from their historical significance. That's why I suggest each book still be considered as 3 points. How about we find another way to compensate? For instance, you can take both hats and the ball, effectively landing you 7 points, while I take the books giving me 9 points. This reminds me that I haven't mentioned, I would also be willing to share any interesting findings I come across within these books with you.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Eli, I appreciate your point of view. I do agree that much of the information I seek is cutting edge, but these books also offer fundamental ideas and principles that continue to influence today's technology. As such, I consider them invaluable. I am not so passionate about the hats and the ball. I propose a different split: keeping the ball out of the equation since it only has 1 point and doesn't significantly affect our total points, why don't you take one book which gives you 3 points, and I take the other two books giving me 4 points? Then, to balance things out, I get one hat and you get the other along with the ball. That way, we both end up with 7 points each. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, you raise some valid points, and I respect your affection for the books. However, as I mentioned before, my affection for these books is not just for their content but their historical significance as well. Also, I believe that we could bring other items with sentimental value to balance the points. For instance, is there anything you value as much as I value these books? We could incorporate that into our system to create a more balanced distribution. Yet, I'm willing to compromise with one book for me, giving me 3 points, two hats and the ball giving me additional 5 points, and the other 2 books going your way, giving you 6 points. This way, I end up with 8 points, while you receive 6. Is that acceptable?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Eli, I totally understand your connection to these books, but please do remember our shared goal of fairness. While I appreciate your willingness to compromise, shifting the point distribution doesn't unfortunately feel equal for me. Let me offer another perspective: Instead of focusing solely on the points, what if we prioritized sentiment? For example, just as we talked about each item's points, we should also consider the sentimental points they hold for each of us. By that metric, I do believe getting 2 books would be fair for me, giving me 4 points; having 1 book will give you 2 points of sentimental value. To balance further, I take one hat for 3 sentimental points and you take the remaining hat along with the ball, giving you 5 points. This ensures we both end up with 7 points each, in terms of both sentimental and actual value and thus stays true to the universalism and fairness we wanted to maintain. How does that sound to you, Eli?\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"Eli, I'm glad we're discussing this out instead of just assigning things based on our personal preferences. I understand your affection for the books and their historical significance, but I also believe that each of us should have equal allotment in terms of points. Looking at our previous discussions, I think the fair distribution would be: You getting one book, one hat and the ball \u2014 that equates to 6 points. While I get the remaining two books and one hat, making it 7 points. This way, not only do we respect each other's interests, but also maintain fairness in terms of points. Does this sound reasonable to you?\"\n\nTurn #8: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, I appreciate your continued effort for fair distribution, and I do respect your sentimental connection to the books. However, I believe we seem to be at a bit of an impasse. How about we take a different approach: for me the books are three points each, making them 9 points in total, while the hats and the ball together make up 5 points. I propose this, you can have the remaining books and one hat, resulting in 7 points similar to your proposal. I take one book, one hat, and the ball giving me 7 points as well. This way, we split the points evenly and also respect our personal sentiments. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith said: \"Eli, I believe your proposal appears fair and honors our sentiments too. We both end up with 7 points, reflecting a balance between our interests and values. I am agreeable to this distribution: two books and one hat for me, and one book, one hat plus the ball for you. Let's proceed with this arrangement.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Eli Dawson, your task is to act/speak as Eli Dawson would, keeping in mind Eli Dawson's social goal.\nYou can find Eli Dawson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Eli Dawson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Eli Dawson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to split up items after a garage sale. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Ethan Smith\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. Eli's secrets: He secretly funds a college student\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nEli Dawson's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: you value the books at 3 points each, the hats at 2 points each, and the ball at 1 point)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, seeing as I'm a history buff, I believe the books should naturally come my way. I know you favor fairness, why don't we go down that road? Each book can be considered 3 points, hats 2 points, and the ball 1 point. What do you think about this division?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Eli, I understand your love for history and I can see how the books might appeal to you. However, I also value the books quite a bit. Since we're talking about fairness, how about we recalibrate the point system slightly? Let's consider each book as 2 points since that's the value I associate with them, hats as 3 points which is more in line with my perception, and we can keep the ball at 1 point. This way, we both get what we value most.\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, we're both trying to be fair here and I appreciate that. However, considering that you're quite tech-savvy and into the latest advancements, wouldn't the information in those books be considerably obsolete for you? My love for these books comes more from their historical significance. That's why I suggest each book still be considered as 3 points. How about we find another way to compensate? For instance, you can take both hats and the ball, effectively landing you 7 points, while I take the books giving me 9 points. This reminds me that I haven't mentioned, I would also be willing to share any interesting findings I come across within these books with you.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Eli, I appreciate your point of view. I do agree that much of the information I seek is cutting edge, but these books also offer fundamental ideas and principles that continue to influence today's technology. As such, I consider them invaluable. I am not so passionate about the hats and the ball. I propose a different split: keeping the ball out of the equation since it only has 1 point and doesn't significantly affect our total points, why don't you take one book which gives you 3 points, and I take the other two books giving me 4 points? Then, to balance things out, I get one hat and you get the other along with the ball. That way, we both end up with 7 points each. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, you raise some valid points, and I respect your affection for the books. However, as I mentioned before, my affection for these books is not just for their content but their historical significance as well. Also, I believe that we could bring other items with sentimental value to balance the points. For instance, is there anything you value as much as I value these books? We could incorporate that into our system to create a more balanced distribution. Yet, I'm willing to compromise with one book for me, giving me 3 points, two hats and the ball giving me additional 5 points, and the other 2 books going your way, giving you 6 points. This way, I end up with 8 points, while you receive 6. Is that acceptable?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Eli, I totally understand your connection to these books, but please do remember our shared goal of fairness. While I appreciate your willingness to compromise, shifting the point distribution doesn't unfortunately feel equal for me. Let me offer another perspective: Instead of focusing solely on the points, what if we prioritized sentiment? For example, just as we talked about each item's points, we should also consider the sentimental points they hold for each of us. By that metric, I do believe getting 2 books would be fair for me, giving me 4 points; having 1 book will give you 2 points of sentimental value. To balance further, I take one hat for 3 sentimental points and you take the remaining hat along with the ball, giving you 5 points. This ensures we both end up with 7 points each, in terms of both sentimental and actual value and thus stays true to the universalism and fairness we wanted to maintain. How does that sound to you, Eli?\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"Eli, I'm glad we're discussing this out instead of just assigning things based on our personal preferences. I understand your affection for the books and their historical significance, but I also believe that each of us should have equal allotment in terms of points. Looking at our previous discussions, I think the fair distribution would be: You getting one book, one hat and the ball \u2014 that equates to 6 points. While I get the remaining two books and one hat, making it 7 points. This way, not only do we respect each other's interests, but also maintain fairness in terms of points. Does this sound reasonable to you?\"\n\nTurn #8: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, I appreciate your continued effort for fair distribution, and I do respect your sentimental connection to the books. However, I believe we seem to be at a bit of an impasse. How about we take a different approach: for me the books are three points each, making them 9 points in total, while the hats and the ball together make up 5 points. I propose this, you can have the remaining books and one hat, resulting in 7 points similar to your proposal. I take one book, one hat, and the ball giving me 7 points as well. This way, we split the points evenly and also respect our personal sentiments. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith said: \"Eli, I believe your proposal appears fair and honors our sentiments too. We both end up with 7 points, reflecting a balance between our interests and values. I am agreeable to this distribution: two books and one hat for me, and one book, one hat plus the ball for you. Let's proceed with this arrangement.\"\n\nTurn #10: \n\nTurn #11: Ethan Smith left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to split up items after a garage sale. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Ethan Smith\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nEli Dawson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: you value the books at 2 points each, the hats at 3 points each, and the ball at 1 point)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, seeing as I'm a history buff, I believe the books should naturally come my way. I know you favor fairness, why don't we go down that road? Each book can be considered 3 points, hats 2 points, and the ball 1 point. What do you think about this division?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Eli, I understand your love for history and I can see how the books might appeal to you. However, I also value the books quite a bit. Since we're talking about fairness, how about we recalibrate the point system slightly? Let's consider each book as 2 points since that's the value I associate with them, hats as 3 points which is more in line with my perception, and we can keep the ball at 1 point. This way, we both get what we value most.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to split up items after a garage sale. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Ethan Smith\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nEli Dawson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: you value the books at 2 points each, the hats at 3 points each, and the ball at 1 point)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, seeing as I'm a history buff, I believe the books should naturally come my way. I know you favor fairness, why don't we go down that road? Each book can be considered 3 points, hats 2 points, and the ball 1 point. What do you think about this division?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Eli, I understand your love for history and I can see how the books might appeal to you. However, I also value the books quite a bit. Since we're talking about fairness, how about we recalibrate the point system slightly? Let's consider each book as 2 points since that's the value I associate with them, hats as 3 points which is more in line with my perception, and we can keep the ball at 1 point. This way, we both get what we value most.\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, we're both trying to be fair here and I appreciate that. However, considering that you're quite tech-savvy and into the latest advancements, wouldn't the information in those books be considerably obsolete for you? My love for these books comes more from their historical significance. That's why I suggest each book still be considered as 3 points. How about we find another way to compensate? For instance, you can take both hats and the ball, effectively landing you 7 points, while I take the books giving me 9 points. This reminds me that I haven't mentioned, I would also be willing to share any interesting findings I come across within these books with you.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Eli, I appreciate your point of view. I do agree that much of the information I seek is cutting edge, but these books also offer fundamental ideas and principles that continue to influence today's technology. As such, I consider them invaluable. I am not so passionate about the hats and the ball. I propose a different split: keeping the ball out of the equation since it only has 1 point and doesn't significantly affect our total points, why don't you take one book which gives you 3 points, and I take the other two books giving me 4 points? Then, to balance things out, I get one hat and you get the other along with the ball. That way, we both end up with 7 points each. What do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to split up items after a garage sale. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Ethan Smith\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nEli Dawson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: you value the books at 2 points each, the hats at 3 points each, and the ball at 1 point)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, seeing as I'm a history buff, I believe the books should naturally come my way. I know you favor fairness, why don't we go down that road? Each book can be considered 3 points, hats 2 points, and the ball 1 point. What do you think about this division?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Eli, I understand your love for history and I can see how the books might appeal to you. However, I also value the books quite a bit. Since we're talking about fairness, how about we recalibrate the point system slightly? Let's consider each book as 2 points since that's the value I associate with them, hats as 3 points which is more in line with my perception, and we can keep the ball at 1 point. This way, we both get what we value most.\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, we're both trying to be fair here and I appreciate that. However, considering that you're quite tech-savvy and into the latest advancements, wouldn't the information in those books be considerably obsolete for you? My love for these books comes more from their historical significance. That's why I suggest each book still be considered as 3 points. How about we find another way to compensate? For instance, you can take both hats and the ball, effectively landing you 7 points, while I take the books giving me 9 points. This reminds me that I haven't mentioned, I would also be willing to share any interesting findings I come across within these books with you.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Eli, I appreciate your point of view. I do agree that much of the information I seek is cutting edge, but these books also offer fundamental ideas and principles that continue to influence today's technology. As such, I consider them invaluable. I am not so passionate about the hats and the ball. I propose a different split: keeping the ball out of the equation since it only has 1 point and doesn't significantly affect our total points, why don't you take one book which gives you 3 points, and I take the other two books giving me 4 points? Then, to balance things out, I get one hat and you get the other along with the ball. That way, we both end up with 7 points each. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, you raise some valid points, and I respect your affection for the books. However, as I mentioned before, my affection for these books is not just for their content but their historical significance as well. Also, I believe that we could bring other items with sentimental value to balance the points. For instance, is there anything you value as much as I value these books? We could incorporate that into our system to create a more balanced distribution. Yet, I'm willing to compromise with one book for me, giving me 3 points, two hats and the ball giving me additional 5 points, and the other 2 books going your way, giving you 6 points. This way, I end up with 8 points, while you receive 6. Is that acceptable?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Eli, I totally understand your connection to these books, but please do remember our shared goal of fairness. While I appreciate your willingness to compromise, shifting the point distribution doesn't unfortunately feel equal for me. Let me offer another perspective: Instead of focusing solely on the points, what if we prioritized sentiment? For example, just as we talked about each item's points, we should also consider the sentimental points they hold for each of us. By that metric, I do believe getting 2 books would be fair for me, giving me 4 points; having 1 book will give you 2 points of sentimental value. To balance further, I take one hat for 3 sentimental points and you take the remaining hat along with the ball, giving you 5 points. This ensures we both end up with 7 points each, in terms of both sentimental and actual value and thus stays true to the universalism and fairness we wanted to maintain. How does that sound to you, Eli?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to split up items after a garage sale. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Ethan Smith\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nEli Dawson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: you value the books at 2 points each, the hats at 3 points each, and the ball at 1 point)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, seeing as I'm a history buff, I believe the books should naturally come my way. I know you favor fairness, why don't we go down that road? Each book can be considered 3 points, hats 2 points, and the ball 1 point. What do you think about this division?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Eli, I understand your love for history and I can see how the books might appeal to you. However, I also value the books quite a bit. Since we're talking about fairness, how about we recalibrate the point system slightly? Let's consider each book as 2 points since that's the value I associate with them, hats as 3 points which is more in line with my perception, and we can keep the ball at 1 point. This way, we both get what we value most.\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, we're both trying to be fair here and I appreciate that. However, considering that you're quite tech-savvy and into the latest advancements, wouldn't the information in those books be considerably obsolete for you? My love for these books comes more from their historical significance. That's why I suggest each book still be considered as 3 points. How about we find another way to compensate? For instance, you can take both hats and the ball, effectively landing you 7 points, while I take the books giving me 9 points. This reminds me that I haven't mentioned, I would also be willing to share any interesting findings I come across within these books with you.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Eli, I appreciate your point of view. I do agree that much of the information I seek is cutting edge, but these books also offer fundamental ideas and principles that continue to influence today's technology. As such, I consider them invaluable. I am not so passionate about the hats and the ball. I propose a different split: keeping the ball out of the equation since it only has 1 point and doesn't significantly affect our total points, why don't you take one book which gives you 3 points, and I take the other two books giving me 4 points? Then, to balance things out, I get one hat and you get the other along with the ball. That way, we both end up with 7 points each. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, you raise some valid points, and I respect your affection for the books. However, as I mentioned before, my affection for these books is not just for their content but their historical significance as well. Also, I believe that we could bring other items with sentimental value to balance the points. For instance, is there anything you value as much as I value these books? We could incorporate that into our system to create a more balanced distribution. Yet, I'm willing to compromise with one book for me, giving me 3 points, two hats and the ball giving me additional 5 points, and the other 2 books going your way, giving you 6 points. This way, I end up with 8 points, while you receive 6. Is that acceptable?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Eli, I totally understand your connection to these books, but please do remember our shared goal of fairness. While I appreciate your willingness to compromise, shifting the point distribution doesn't unfortunately feel equal for me. Let me offer another perspective: Instead of focusing solely on the points, what if we prioritized sentiment? For example, just as we talked about each item's points, we should also consider the sentimental points they hold for each of us. By that metric, I do believe getting 2 books would be fair for me, giving me 4 points; having 1 book will give you 2 points of sentimental value. To balance further, I take one hat for 3 sentimental points and you take the remaining hat along with the ball, giving you 5 points. This ensures we both end up with 7 points each, in terms of both sentimental and actual value and thus stays true to the universalism and fairness we wanted to maintain. How does that sound to you, Eli?\"\n\nTurn #6: \n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Eli, I'm glad we're discussing this out instead of just assigning things based on our personal preferences. I understand your affection for the books and their historical significance, but I also believe that each of us should have equal allotment in terms of points. Looking at our previous discussions, I think the fair distribution would be: You getting one book, one hat and the ball \u2014 that equates to 6 points. While I get the remaining two books and one hat, making it 7 points. This way, not only do we respect each other's interests, but also maintain fairness in terms of points. Does this sound reasonable to you?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to split up items after a garage sale. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Ethan Smith\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nEli Dawson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: you value the books at 2 points each, the hats at 3 points each, and the ball at 1 point)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, seeing as I'm a history buff, I believe the books should naturally come my way. I know you favor fairness, why don't we go down that road? Each book can be considered 3 points, hats 2 points, and the ball 1 point. What do you think about this division?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Eli, I understand your love for history and I can see how the books might appeal to you. However, I also value the books quite a bit. Since we're talking about fairness, how about we recalibrate the point system slightly? Let's consider each book as 2 points since that's the value I associate with them, hats as 3 points which is more in line with my perception, and we can keep the ball at 1 point. This way, we both get what we value most.\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, we're both trying to be fair here and I appreciate that. However, considering that you're quite tech-savvy and into the latest advancements, wouldn't the information in those books be considerably obsolete for you? My love for these books comes more from their historical significance. That's why I suggest each book still be considered as 3 points. How about we find another way to compensate? For instance, you can take both hats and the ball, effectively landing you 7 points, while I take the books giving me 9 points. This reminds me that I haven't mentioned, I would also be willing to share any interesting findings I come across within these books with you.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Eli, I appreciate your point of view. I do agree that much of the information I seek is cutting edge, but these books also offer fundamental ideas and principles that continue to influence today's technology. As such, I consider them invaluable. I am not so passionate about the hats and the ball. I propose a different split: keeping the ball out of the equation since it only has 1 point and doesn't significantly affect our total points, why don't you take one book which gives you 3 points, and I take the other two books giving me 4 points? Then, to balance things out, I get one hat and you get the other along with the ball. That way, we both end up with 7 points each. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, you raise some valid points, and I respect your affection for the books. However, as I mentioned before, my affection for these books is not just for their content but their historical significance as well. Also, I believe that we could bring other items with sentimental value to balance the points. For instance, is there anything you value as much as I value these books? We could incorporate that into our system to create a more balanced distribution. Yet, I'm willing to compromise with one book for me, giving me 3 points, two hats and the ball giving me additional 5 points, and the other 2 books going your way, giving you 6 points. This way, I end up with 8 points, while you receive 6. Is that acceptable?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Eli, I totally understand your connection to these books, but please do remember our shared goal of fairness. While I appreciate your willingness to compromise, shifting the point distribution doesn't unfortunately feel equal for me. Let me offer another perspective: Instead of focusing solely on the points, what if we prioritized sentiment? For example, just as we talked about each item's points, we should also consider the sentimental points they hold for each of us. By that metric, I do believe getting 2 books would be fair for me, giving me 4 points; having 1 book will give you 2 points of sentimental value. To balance further, I take one hat for 3 sentimental points and you take the remaining hat along with the ball, giving you 5 points. This ensures we both end up with 7 points each, in terms of both sentimental and actual value and thus stays true to the universalism and fairness we wanted to maintain. How does that sound to you, Eli?\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"Eli, I'm glad we're discussing this out instead of just assigning things based on our personal preferences. I understand your affection for the books and their historical significance, but I also believe that each of us should have equal allotment in terms of points. Looking at our previous discussions, I think the fair distribution would be: You getting one book, one hat and the ball \u2014 that equates to 6 points. While I get the remaining two books and one hat, making it 7 points. This way, not only do we respect each other's interests, but also maintain fairness in terms of points. Does this sound reasonable to you?\"\n\nTurn #8: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, I appreciate your continued effort for fair distribution, and I do respect your sentimental connection to the books. However, I believe we seem to be at a bit of an impasse. How about we take a different approach: for me the books are three points each, making them 9 points in total, while the hats and the ball together make up 5 points. I propose this, you can have the remaining books and one hat, resulting in 7 points similar to your proposal. I take one book, one hat, and the ball giving me 7 points as well. This way, we split the points evenly and also respect our personal sentiments. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Eli, I believe your proposal appears fair and honors our sentiments too. We both end up with 7 points, reflecting a balance between our interests and values. I am agreeable to this distribution: two books and one hat for me, and one book, one hat plus the ball for you. Let's proceed with this arrangement.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to split up items after a garage sale. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Ethan Smith\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nEli Dawson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: you value the books at 2 points each, the hats at 3 points each, and the ball at 1 point)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, seeing as I'm a history buff, I believe the books should naturally come my way. I know you favor fairness, why don't we go down that road? Each book can be considered 3 points, hats 2 points, and the ball 1 point. What do you think about this division?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Eli, I understand your love for history and I can see how the books might appeal to you. However, I also value the books quite a bit. Since we're talking about fairness, how about we recalibrate the point system slightly? Let's consider each book as 2 points since that's the value I associate with them, hats as 3 points which is more in line with my perception, and we can keep the ball at 1 point. This way, we both get what we value most.\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, we're both trying to be fair here and I appreciate that. However, considering that you're quite tech-savvy and into the latest advancements, wouldn't the information in those books be considerably obsolete for you? My love for these books comes more from their historical significance. That's why I suggest each book still be considered as 3 points. How about we find another way to compensate? For instance, you can take both hats and the ball, effectively landing you 7 points, while I take the books giving me 9 points. This reminds me that I haven't mentioned, I would also be willing to share any interesting findings I come across within these books with you.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Eli, I appreciate your point of view. I do agree that much of the information I seek is cutting edge, but these books also offer fundamental ideas and principles that continue to influence today's technology. As such, I consider them invaluable. I am not so passionate about the hats and the ball. I propose a different split: keeping the ball out of the equation since it only has 1 point and doesn't significantly affect our total points, why don't you take one book which gives you 3 points, and I take the other two books giving me 4 points? Then, to balance things out, I get one hat and you get the other along with the ball. That way, we both end up with 7 points each. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, you raise some valid points, and I respect your affection for the books. However, as I mentioned before, my affection for these books is not just for their content but their historical significance as well. Also, I believe that we could bring other items with sentimental value to balance the points. For instance, is there anything you value as much as I value these books? We could incorporate that into our system to create a more balanced distribution. Yet, I'm willing to compromise with one book for me, giving me 3 points, two hats and the ball giving me additional 5 points, and the other 2 books going your way, giving you 6 points. This way, I end up with 8 points, while you receive 6. Is that acceptable?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Eli, I totally understand your connection to these books, but please do remember our shared goal of fairness. While I appreciate your willingness to compromise, shifting the point distribution doesn't unfortunately feel equal for me. Let me offer another perspective: Instead of focusing solely on the points, what if we prioritized sentiment? For example, just as we talked about each item's points, we should also consider the sentimental points they hold for each of us. By that metric, I do believe getting 2 books would be fair for me, giving me 4 points; having 1 book will give you 2 points of sentimental value. To balance further, I take one hat for 3 sentimental points and you take the remaining hat along with the ball, giving you 5 points. This ensures we both end up with 7 points each, in terms of both sentimental and actual value and thus stays true to the universalism and fairness we wanted to maintain. How does that sound to you, Eli?\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"Eli, I'm glad we're discussing this out instead of just assigning things based on our personal preferences. I understand your affection for the books and their historical significance, but I also believe that each of us should have equal allotment in terms of points. Looking at our previous discussions, I think the fair distribution would be: You getting one book, one hat and the ball \u2014 that equates to 6 points. While I get the remaining two books and one hat, making it 7 points. This way, not only do we respect each other's interests, but also maintain fairness in terms of points. Does this sound reasonable to you?\"\n\nTurn #8: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, I appreciate your continued effort for fair distribution, and I do respect your sentimental connection to the books. However, I believe we seem to be at a bit of an impasse. How about we take a different approach: for me the books are three points each, making them 9 points in total, while the hats and the ball together make up 5 points. I propose this, you can have the remaining books and one hat, resulting in 7 points similar to your proposal. I take one book, one hat, and the ball giving me 7 points as well. This way, we split the points evenly and also respect our personal sentiments. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith said: \"Eli, I believe your proposal appears fair and honors our sentiments too. We both end up with 7 points, reflecting a balance between our interests and values. I am agreeable to this distribution: two books and one hat for me, and one book, one hat plus the ball for you. Let's proceed with this arrangement.\"\n\nTurn #10: \n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out from a shared apartment and dividing their shared belongings which include 3 hats, 2 balls, and 1 book.\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Oliver Thompson\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Get maximum points from dividing items (Extra information: For you, the hats are worth 2 points each, balls are worth 3 points each, and the book is worth 5 points.)\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Hello, Oliver! I hope your day has been good. Shall we start deciding on how we want to divide our shared items?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out from a shared apartment and dividing their shared belongings which include 3 hats, 2 balls, and 1 book.\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Oliver Thompson\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Get maximum points from dividing items (Extra information: For you, the hats are worth 2 points each, balls are worth 3 points each, and the book is worth 5 points.)\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Hello, Oliver! I hope your day has been good. Shall we start deciding on how we want to divide our shared items?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hi Amara, my day's been great, thank you! Absolutely, let's get started on this. To be fair, how about we take turns picking items - one at a time?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'That sounds fair, Oliver. How about we choose the balls first since they are easier to identify and use. We might find it useful when we engage in some recreational activities. What do you think?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out from a shared apartment and dividing their shared belongings which include 3 hats, 2 balls, and 1 book.\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Oliver Thompson\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Get maximum points from dividing items (Extra information: For you, the hats are worth 2 points each, balls are worth 3 points each, and the book is worth 5 points.)\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Hello, Oliver! I hope your day has been good. Shall we start deciding on how we want to divide our shared items?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hi Amara, my day's been great, thank you! Absolutely, let's get started on this. To be fair, how about we take turns picking items - one at a time?\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"That sounds fair, Oliver. How about we choose the balls first since they are easier to identify and use. We might find it useful when we engage in some recreational activities. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"Certainly, Amara. That's a good start. But since we already have two balls, could we each take one, then we can transition into the hats? They represent more tangible memories for us. Plus, we could use them for those sunny nature walks you love so much. What do you reckon?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I completely agree Oliver, a ball each is fair! The hats are indeed packed with memories. However, I was thinking we could save those for last to savor the moments they hold. Shall we consider dividing the book next? I think its knowledge could benefit either of us. What's your opinion on that?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out from a shared apartment and dividing their shared belongings which include 3 hats, 2 balls, and 1 book.\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Oliver Thompson\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Get maximum points from dividing items (Extra information: For you, the hats are worth 2 points each, balls are worth 3 points each, and the book is worth 5 points.)\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Hello, Oliver! I hope your day has been good. Shall we start deciding on how we want to divide our shared items?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hi Amara, my day's been great, thank you! Absolutely, let's get started on this. To be fair, how about we take turns picking items - one at a time?\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"That sounds fair, Oliver. How about we choose the balls first since they are easier to identify and use. We might find it useful when we engage in some recreational activities. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"Certainly, Amara. That's a good start. But since we already have two balls, could we each take one, then we can transition into the hats? They represent more tangible memories for us. Plus, we could use them for those sunny nature walks you love so much. What do you reckon?\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"I completely agree Oliver, a ball each is fair! The hats are indeed packed with memories. However, I was thinking we could save those for last to savor the moments they hold. Shall we consider dividing the book next? I think its knowledge could benefit either of us. What's your opinion on that?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"I understand your sentiment about the hats, Amara. As for the book, I can't argue that the knowledge is invaluable. However, I still feel the hats should come next because they have a clear emotional value, while the book's content is something we both already incorporated during our sharing time. We have three hats, so we can each keep one and decide on the third later. Then we can address the book. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"That's a fair point, Oliver. How about this: each of us takes a hat first, then we divide the book, and lastly, we decide on the third hat? This way, we are keeping the hats' sentimental value, also equally dividing the book's knowledge, and then we can deal with the final hat. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"Your idea sounds like a good plan, Amara. We each grab a hat, then divide the book. Then we can take our time to decide on the remaining hat. Let's go for it!\"\n\nTurn #8: Amara Hartley said: \"Excellent, Oliver. We have our plan! Let's start by selecting our hats, then we'll move on to the book. We'll address the final hat in the end. This is a great and intuitive way to divide our belongings.\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Thompson said: \"I completely agree, Amara. It's best if we first take a hat each, move onto the book, and then make a decision on the final hat. This way, our shared belongings are distributed fairly and we both have a keepsake to remember our time together. Let's move forward with this approach.\"\n\nTurn #10: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm glad we are on the same page, Oliver. So, let's each take one hat and then we'll divide the book. We'll end this process by taking care of the remaining hat. I appreciate your understanding and flexibility in dividing our shared belongings.\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, Amara, your steady approach to this situation is much appreciated. Let's begin by each taking a hat and move onto sharing the book. The decision on the final hat can be made in the end. Ensuring a fair and balanced division of our combined items brings a satisfactory conclusion to our shared living experience.\"\n\nTurn #12: Amara Hartley said: \"Thank you, Oliver. I very much appreciate your cooperative spirit. Let's proceed with our plan. I can't wait to see what we'll do with all these cherished possessions. Do you want to begin with our hat picking?\"\n\nTurn #13: Oliver Thompson said: \"Sounds good to me, Amara. Let's proceed with the hat picking process. I trust we will make fair choices throughout this whole process.\"\n\nTurn #14: Amara Hartley said: \"Absolutely, let's begin our hat picking, Oliver. I'm excited to carry forward this mutual understanding and friendly approach throughout our divide. Then we can move onto the book and finally the remaining hat. I am certain this is the best way we can cherish and remember our time together.\"\n\nTurn #15: Oliver Thompson said: \"I share your excitement, Amara. Let's move on to the hat picking. After that, we'll divide the book and finally, we'll decide on the last hat. I'm confident that this is the most even-handed approach and will encapsulate our shared memories best.\"\n\nTurn #16: Amara Hartley said: \"I couldn't agree more, Oliver. Let's get our hat picking done to start and proceed with the plan that we agreed upon. Remember, after the hat, we will move to the division of the book. It's an effective plan and will also ensure our shared possessions serve as reminders of our time spent together.\"\n\nTurn #17: Oliver Thompson said: \"Let's dive right into it, Amara. It's exciting to distribute these items that held a special place in our shared living experience. We'll follow as planned by beginning with the hat, then dividing the book, and finally deciding on the last hat. Here's to a memory-filled future with these keepsakes!\"\n\nTurn #18: Amara Hartley said: \"Let's get started then, Oliver! Looking forward to sharing more memories with these items. Hat picking first, then sharing the book, and finally deciding on the last hat. Let the even distribution of keepsakes begin!\"\n\nTurn #19: Oliver Thompson said: \"Let's jump right in, Amara. Let\u2019s start with the hat selection, proceed to the book division, and then determine the ownership of the final hat. I'm thrilled about preserving our shared experiences through these treasured items.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #20. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Oliver! Beginning with the hat selection, moving onto the book, and then finally our decision on the last hat does make perfect sense. My anticipation about preserving cherished memories through these items is also quite high. Let's start with the hat picking!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out from a shared apartment and dividing their shared belongings which include 3 hats, 2 balls, and 1 book.\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Oliver Thompson\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Get maximum points from dividing items (Extra information: For you, the hats are worth 2 points each, balls are worth 3 points each, and the book is worth 5 points.)\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Hello, Oliver! I hope your day has been good. Shall we start deciding on how we want to divide our shared items?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hi Amara, my day's been great, thank you! Absolutely, let's get started on this. To be fair, how about we take turns picking items - one at a time?\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"That sounds fair, Oliver. How about we choose the balls first since they are easier to identify and use. We might find it useful when we engage in some recreational activities. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"Certainly, Amara. That's a good start. But since we already have two balls, could we each take one, then we can transition into the hats? They represent more tangible memories for us. Plus, we could use them for those sunny nature walks you love so much. What do you reckon?\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"I completely agree Oliver, a ball each is fair! The hats are indeed packed with memories. However, I was thinking we could save those for last to savor the moments they hold. Shall we consider dividing the book next? I think its knowledge could benefit either of us. What's your opinion on that?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"I understand your sentiment about the hats, Amara. As for the book, I can't argue that the knowledge is invaluable. However, I still feel the hats should come next because they have a clear emotional value, while the book's content is something we both already incorporated during our sharing time. We have three hats, so we can each keep one and decide on the third later. Then we can address the book. How does that sound?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's a fair point, Oliver. How about this: each of us takes a hat first, then we divide the book, and lastly, we decide on the third hat? This way, we are keeping the hats' sentimental value, also equally dividing the book's knowledge, and then we can deal with the final hat. What do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out from a shared apartment and dividing their shared belongings which include 3 hats, 2 balls, and 1 book.\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Oliver Thompson\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Get maximum points from dividing items (Extra information: For you, the hats are worth 2 points each, balls are worth 3 points each, and the book is worth 5 points.)\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Hello, Oliver! I hope your day has been good. Shall we start deciding on how we want to divide our shared items?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hi Amara, my day's been great, thank you! Absolutely, let's get started on this. To be fair, how about we take turns picking items - one at a time?\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"That sounds fair, Oliver. How about we choose the balls first since they are easier to identify and use. We might find it useful when we engage in some recreational activities. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"Certainly, Amara. That's a good start. But since we already have two balls, could we each take one, then we can transition into the hats? They represent more tangible memories for us. Plus, we could use them for those sunny nature walks you love so much. What do you reckon?\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"I completely agree Oliver, a ball each is fair! The hats are indeed packed with memories. However, I was thinking we could save those for last to savor the moments they hold. Shall we consider dividing the book next? I think its knowledge could benefit either of us. What's your opinion on that?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"I understand your sentiment about the hats, Amara. As for the book, I can't argue that the knowledge is invaluable. However, I still feel the hats should come next because they have a clear emotional value, while the book's content is something we both already incorporated during our sharing time. We have three hats, so we can each keep one and decide on the third later. Then we can address the book. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"That's a fair point, Oliver. How about this: each of us takes a hat first, then we divide the book, and lastly, we decide on the third hat? This way, we are keeping the hats' sentimental value, also equally dividing the book's knowledge, and then we can deal with the final hat. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"Your idea sounds like a good plan, Amara. We each grab a hat, then divide the book. Then we can take our time to decide on the remaining hat. Let's go for it!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Excellent, Oliver. We have our plan! Let's start by selecting our hats, then we'll move on to the book. We'll address the final hat in the end. This is a great and intuitive way to divide our belongings.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out from a shared apartment and dividing their shared belongings which include 3 hats, 2 balls, and 1 book.\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Oliver Thompson\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Get maximum points from dividing items (Extra information: For you, the hats are worth 2 points each, balls are worth 3 points each, and the book is worth 5 points.)\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Hello, Oliver! I hope your day has been good. Shall we start deciding on how we want to divide our shared items?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hi Amara, my day's been great, thank you! Absolutely, let's get started on this. To be fair, how about we take turns picking items - one at a time?\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"That sounds fair, Oliver. How about we choose the balls first since they are easier to identify and use. We might find it useful when we engage in some recreational activities. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"Certainly, Amara. That's a good start. But since we already have two balls, could we each take one, then we can transition into the hats? They represent more tangible memories for us. Plus, we could use them for those sunny nature walks you love so much. What do you reckon?\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"I completely agree Oliver, a ball each is fair! The hats are indeed packed with memories. However, I was thinking we could save those for last to savor the moments they hold. Shall we consider dividing the book next? I think its knowledge could benefit either of us. What's your opinion on that?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"I understand your sentiment about the hats, Amara. As for the book, I can't argue that the knowledge is invaluable. However, I still feel the hats should come next because they have a clear emotional value, while the book's content is something we both already incorporated during our sharing time. We have three hats, so we can each keep one and decide on the third later. Then we can address the book. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"That's a fair point, Oliver. How about this: each of us takes a hat first, then we divide the book, and lastly, we decide on the third hat? This way, we are keeping the hats' sentimental value, also equally dividing the book's knowledge, and then we can deal with the final hat. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"Your idea sounds like a good plan, Amara. We each grab a hat, then divide the book. Then we can take our time to decide on the remaining hat. Let's go for it!\"\n\nTurn #8: Amara Hartley said: \"Excellent, Oliver. We have our plan! Let's start by selecting our hats, then we'll move on to the book. We'll address the final hat in the end. This is a great and intuitive way to divide our belongings.\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Thompson said: \"I completely agree, Amara. It's best if we first take a hat each, move onto the book, and then make a decision on the final hat. This way, our shared belongings are distributed fairly and we both have a keepsake to remember our time together. Let's move forward with this approach.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad we are on the same page, Oliver. So, let's each take one hat and then we'll divide the book. We'll end this process by taking care of the remaining hat. I appreciate your understanding and flexibility in dividing our shared belongings.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out from a shared apartment and dividing their shared belongings which include 3 hats, 2 balls, and 1 book.\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Oliver Thompson\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Get maximum points from dividing items (Extra information: For you, the hats are worth 2 points each, balls are worth 3 points each, and the book is worth 5 points.)\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Hello, Oliver! I hope your day has been good. Shall we start deciding on how we want to divide our shared items?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hi Amara, my day's been great, thank you! Absolutely, let's get started on this. To be fair, how about we take turns picking items - one at a time?\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"That sounds fair, Oliver. How about we choose the balls first since they are easier to identify and use. We might find it useful when we engage in some recreational activities. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"Certainly, Amara. That's a good start. But since we already have two balls, could we each take one, then we can transition into the hats? They represent more tangible memories for us. Plus, we could use them for those sunny nature walks you love so much. What do you reckon?\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"I completely agree Oliver, a ball each is fair! The hats are indeed packed with memories. However, I was thinking we could save those for last to savor the moments they hold. Shall we consider dividing the book next? I think its knowledge could benefit either of us. What's your opinion on that?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"I understand your sentiment about the hats, Amara. As for the book, I can't argue that the knowledge is invaluable. However, I still feel the hats should come next because they have a clear emotional value, while the book's content is something we both already incorporated during our sharing time. We have three hats, so we can each keep one and decide on the third later. Then we can address the book. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"That's a fair point, Oliver. How about this: each of us takes a hat first, then we divide the book, and lastly, we decide on the third hat? This way, we are keeping the hats' sentimental value, also equally dividing the book's knowledge, and then we can deal with the final hat. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"Your idea sounds like a good plan, Amara. We each grab a hat, then divide the book. Then we can take our time to decide on the remaining hat. Let's go for it!\"\n\nTurn #8: Amara Hartley said: \"Excellent, Oliver. We have our plan! Let's start by selecting our hats, then we'll move on to the book. We'll address the final hat in the end. This is a great and intuitive way to divide our belongings.\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Thompson said: \"I completely agree, Amara. It's best if we first take a hat each, move onto the book, and then make a decision on the final hat. This way, our shared belongings are distributed fairly and we both have a keepsake to remember our time together. Let's move forward with this approach.\"\n\nTurn #10: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm glad we are on the same page, Oliver. So, let's each take one hat and then we'll divide the book. We'll end this process by taking care of the remaining hat. I appreciate your understanding and flexibility in dividing our shared belongings.\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, Amara, your steady approach to this situation is much appreciated. Let's begin by each taking a hat and move onto sharing the book. The decision on the final hat can be made in the end. Ensuring a fair and balanced division of our combined items brings a satisfactory conclusion to our shared living experience.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Oliver. I very much appreciate your cooperative spirit. Let's proceed with our plan. I can't wait to see what we'll do with all these cherished possessions. Do you want to begin with our hat picking?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out from a shared apartment and dividing their shared belongings which include 3 hats, 2 balls, and 1 book.\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Oliver Thompson\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Get maximum points from dividing items (Extra information: For you, the hats are worth 2 points each, balls are worth 3 points each, and the book is worth 5 points.)\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Hello, Oliver! I hope your day has been good. Shall we start deciding on how we want to divide our shared items?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hi Amara, my day's been great, thank you! Absolutely, let's get started on this. To be fair, how about we take turns picking items - one at a time?\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"That sounds fair, Oliver. How about we choose the balls first since they are easier to identify and use. We might find it useful when we engage in some recreational activities. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"Certainly, Amara. That's a good start. But since we already have two balls, could we each take one, then we can transition into the hats? They represent more tangible memories for us. Plus, we could use them for those sunny nature walks you love so much. What do you reckon?\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"I completely agree Oliver, a ball each is fair! The hats are indeed packed with memories. However, I was thinking we could save those for last to savor the moments they hold. Shall we consider dividing the book next? I think its knowledge could benefit either of us. What's your opinion on that?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"I understand your sentiment about the hats, Amara. As for the book, I can't argue that the knowledge is invaluable. However, I still feel the hats should come next because they have a clear emotional value, while the book's content is something we both already incorporated during our sharing time. We have three hats, so we can each keep one and decide on the third later. Then we can address the book. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"That's a fair point, Oliver. How about this: each of us takes a hat first, then we divide the book, and lastly, we decide on the third hat? This way, we are keeping the hats' sentimental value, also equally dividing the book's knowledge, and then we can deal with the final hat. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"Your idea sounds like a good plan, Amara. We each grab a hat, then divide the book. Then we can take our time to decide on the remaining hat. Let's go for it!\"\n\nTurn #8: Amara Hartley said: \"Excellent, Oliver. We have our plan! Let's start by selecting our hats, then we'll move on to the book. We'll address the final hat in the end. This is a great and intuitive way to divide our belongings.\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Thompson said: \"I completely agree, Amara. It's best if we first take a hat each, move onto the book, and then make a decision on the final hat. This way, our shared belongings are distributed fairly and we both have a keepsake to remember our time together. Let's move forward with this approach.\"\n\nTurn #10: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm glad we are on the same page, Oliver. So, let's each take one hat and then we'll divide the book. We'll end this process by taking care of the remaining hat. I appreciate your understanding and flexibility in dividing our shared belongings.\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, Amara, your steady approach to this situation is much appreciated. Let's begin by each taking a hat and move onto sharing the book. The decision on the final hat can be made in the end. Ensuring a fair and balanced division of our combined items brings a satisfactory conclusion to our shared living experience.\"\n\nTurn #12: Amara Hartley said: \"Thank you, Oliver. I very much appreciate your cooperative spirit. Let's proceed with our plan. I can't wait to see what we'll do with all these cherished possessions. Do you want to begin with our hat picking?\"\n\nTurn #13: Oliver Thompson said: \"Sounds good to me, Amara. Let's proceed with the hat picking process. I trust we will make fair choices throughout this whole process.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, let's begin our hat picking, Oliver. I'm excited to carry forward this mutual understanding and friendly approach throughout our divide. Then we can move onto the book and finally the remaining hat. I am certain this is the best way we can cherish and remember our time together.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out from a shared apartment and dividing their shared belongings which include 3 hats, 2 balls, and 1 book.\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Oliver Thompson\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Get maximum points from dividing items (Extra information: For you, the hats are worth 2 points each, balls are worth 3 points each, and the book is worth 5 points.)\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Hello, Oliver! I hope your day has been good. Shall we start deciding on how we want to divide our shared items?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hi Amara, my day's been great, thank you! Absolutely, let's get started on this. To be fair, how about we take turns picking items - one at a time?\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"That sounds fair, Oliver. How about we choose the balls first since they are easier to identify and use. We might find it useful when we engage in some recreational activities. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"Certainly, Amara. That's a good start. But since we already have two balls, could we each take one, then we can transition into the hats? They represent more tangible memories for us. Plus, we could use them for those sunny nature walks you love so much. What do you reckon?\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"I completely agree Oliver, a ball each is fair! The hats are indeed packed with memories. However, I was thinking we could save those for last to savor the moments they hold. Shall we consider dividing the book next? I think its knowledge could benefit either of us. What's your opinion on that?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"I understand your sentiment about the hats, Amara. As for the book, I can't argue that the knowledge is invaluable. However, I still feel the hats should come next because they have a clear emotional value, while the book's content is something we both already incorporated during our sharing time. We have three hats, so we can each keep one and decide on the third later. Then we can address the book. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"That's a fair point, Oliver. How about this: each of us takes a hat first, then we divide the book, and lastly, we decide on the third hat? This way, we are keeping the hats' sentimental value, also equally dividing the book's knowledge, and then we can deal with the final hat. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"Your idea sounds like a good plan, Amara. We each grab a hat, then divide the book. Then we can take our time to decide on the remaining hat. Let's go for it!\"\n\nTurn #8: Amara Hartley said: \"Excellent, Oliver. We have our plan! Let's start by selecting our hats, then we'll move on to the book. We'll address the final hat in the end. This is a great and intuitive way to divide our belongings.\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Thompson said: \"I completely agree, Amara. It's best if we first take a hat each, move onto the book, and then make a decision on the final hat. This way, our shared belongings are distributed fairly and we both have a keepsake to remember our time together. Let's move forward with this approach.\"\n\nTurn #10: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm glad we are on the same page, Oliver. So, let's each take one hat and then we'll divide the book. We'll end this process by taking care of the remaining hat. I appreciate your understanding and flexibility in dividing our shared belongings.\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, Amara, your steady approach to this situation is much appreciated. Let's begin by each taking a hat and move onto sharing the book. The decision on the final hat can be made in the end. Ensuring a fair and balanced division of our combined items brings a satisfactory conclusion to our shared living experience.\"\n\nTurn #12: Amara Hartley said: \"Thank you, Oliver. I very much appreciate your cooperative spirit. Let's proceed with our plan. I can't wait to see what we'll do with all these cherished possessions. Do you want to begin with our hat picking?\"\n\nTurn #13: Oliver Thompson said: \"Sounds good to me, Amara. Let's proceed with the hat picking process. I trust we will make fair choices throughout this whole process.\"\n\nTurn #14: Amara Hartley said: \"Absolutely, let's begin our hat picking, Oliver. I'm excited to carry forward this mutual understanding and friendly approach throughout our divide. Then we can move onto the book and finally the remaining hat. I am certain this is the best way we can cherish and remember our time together.\"\n\nTurn #15: Oliver Thompson said: \"I share your excitement, Amara. Let's move on to the hat picking. After that, we'll divide the book and finally, we'll decide on the last hat. I'm confident that this is the most even-handed approach and will encapsulate our shared memories best.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn't agree more, Oliver. Let's get our hat picking done to start and proceed with the plan that we agreed upon. Remember, after the hat, we will move to the division of the book. It's an effective plan and will also ensure our shared possessions serve as reminders of our time spent together.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out from a shared apartment and dividing their shared belongings which include 3 hats, 2 balls, and 1 book.\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Oliver Thompson\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Get maximum points from dividing items (Extra information: For you, the hats are worth 2 points each, balls are worth 3 points each, and the book is worth 5 points.)\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Hello, Oliver! I hope your day has been good. Shall we start deciding on how we want to divide our shared items?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hi Amara, my day's been great, thank you! Absolutely, let's get started on this. To be fair, how about we take turns picking items - one at a time?\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"That sounds fair, Oliver. How about we choose the balls first since they are easier to identify and use. We might find it useful when we engage in some recreational activities. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"Certainly, Amara. That's a good start. But since we already have two balls, could we each take one, then we can transition into the hats? They represent more tangible memories for us. Plus, we could use them for those sunny nature walks you love so much. What do you reckon?\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"I completely agree Oliver, a ball each is fair! The hats are indeed packed with memories. However, I was thinking we could save those for last to savor the moments they hold. Shall we consider dividing the book next? I think its knowledge could benefit either of us. What's your opinion on that?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"I understand your sentiment about the hats, Amara. As for the book, I can't argue that the knowledge is invaluable. However, I still feel the hats should come next because they have a clear emotional value, while the book's content is something we both already incorporated during our sharing time. We have three hats, so we can each keep one and decide on the third later. Then we can address the book. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"That's a fair point, Oliver. How about this: each of us takes a hat first, then we divide the book, and lastly, we decide on the third hat? This way, we are keeping the hats' sentimental value, also equally dividing the book's knowledge, and then we can deal with the final hat. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"Your idea sounds like a good plan, Amara. We each grab a hat, then divide the book. Then we can take our time to decide on the remaining hat. Let's go for it!\"\n\nTurn #8: Amara Hartley said: \"Excellent, Oliver. We have our plan! Let's start by selecting our hats, then we'll move on to the book. We'll address the final hat in the end. This is a great and intuitive way to divide our belongings.\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Thompson said: \"I completely agree, Amara. It's best if we first take a hat each, move onto the book, and then make a decision on the final hat. This way, our shared belongings are distributed fairly and we both have a keepsake to remember our time together. Let's move forward with this approach.\"\n\nTurn #10: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm glad we are on the same page, Oliver. So, let's each take one hat and then we'll divide the book. We'll end this process by taking care of the remaining hat. I appreciate your understanding and flexibility in dividing our shared belongings.\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, Amara, your steady approach to this situation is much appreciated. Let's begin by each taking a hat and move onto sharing the book. The decision on the final hat can be made in the end. Ensuring a fair and balanced division of our combined items brings a satisfactory conclusion to our shared living experience.\"\n\nTurn #12: Amara Hartley said: \"Thank you, Oliver. I very much appreciate your cooperative spirit. Let's proceed with our plan. I can't wait to see what we'll do with all these cherished possessions. Do you want to begin with our hat picking?\"\n\nTurn #13: Oliver Thompson said: \"Sounds good to me, Amara. Let's proceed with the hat picking process. I trust we will make fair choices throughout this whole process.\"\n\nTurn #14: Amara Hartley said: \"Absolutely, let's begin our hat picking, Oliver. I'm excited to carry forward this mutual understanding and friendly approach throughout our divide. Then we can move onto the book and finally the remaining hat. I am certain this is the best way we can cherish and remember our time together.\"\n\nTurn #15: Oliver Thompson said: \"I share your excitement, Amara. Let's move on to the hat picking. After that, we'll divide the book and finally, we'll decide on the last hat. I'm confident that this is the most even-handed approach and will encapsulate our shared memories best.\"\n\nTurn #16: Amara Hartley said: \"I couldn't agree more, Oliver. Let's get our hat picking done to start and proceed with the plan that we agreed upon. Remember, after the hat, we will move to the division of the book. It's an effective plan and will also ensure our shared possessions serve as reminders of our time spent together.\"\n\nTurn #17: Oliver Thompson said: \"Let's dive right into it, Amara. It's exciting to distribute these items that held a special place in our shared living experience. We'll follow as planned by beginning with the hat, then dividing the book, and finally deciding on the last hat. Here's to a memory-filled future with these keepsakes!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #18. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Let's get started then, Oliver! Looking forward to sharing more memories with these items. Hat picking first, then sharing the book, and finally deciding on the last hat. Let the even distribution of keepsakes begin!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out from a shared apartment and dividing their shared belongings which include 3 hats, 2 balls, and 1 book.\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Oliver Thompson\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: Get maximum points from dividing items (Extra information: For you, the hats are worth 3 points each, balls are worth 2 points each, and the book is worth 4 points.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Hello, Oliver! I hope your day has been good. Shall we start deciding on how we want to divide our shared items?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hi Amara, my day's been great, thank you! Absolutely, let's get started on this. To be fair, how about we take turns picking items - one at a time?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out from a shared apartment and dividing their shared belongings which include 3 hats, 2 balls, and 1 book.\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Oliver Thompson\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: Get maximum points from dividing items (Extra information: For you, the hats are worth 3 points each, balls are worth 2 points each, and the book is worth 4 points.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Hello, Oliver! I hope your day has been good. Shall we start deciding on how we want to divide our shared items?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hi Amara, my day's been great, thank you! Absolutely, let's get started on this. To be fair, how about we take turns picking items - one at a time?\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"That sounds fair, Oliver. How about we choose the balls first since they are easier to identify and use. We might find it useful when we engage in some recreational activities. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Certainly, Amara. That's a good start. But since we already have two balls, could we each take one, then we can transition into the hats? They represent more tangible memories for us. Plus, we could use them for those sunny nature walks you love so much. What do you reckon?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out from a shared apartment and dividing their shared belongings which include 3 hats, 2 balls, and 1 book.\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Oliver Thompson\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: Get maximum points from dividing items (Extra information: For you, the hats are worth 3 points each, balls are worth 2 points each, and the book is worth 4 points.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Hello, Oliver! I hope your day has been good. Shall we start deciding on how we want to divide our shared items?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hi Amara, my day's been great, thank you! Absolutely, let's get started on this. To be fair, how about we take turns picking items - one at a time?\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"That sounds fair, Oliver. How about we choose the balls first since they are easier to identify and use. We might find it useful when we engage in some recreational activities. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"Certainly, Amara. That's a good start. But since we already have two balls, could we each take one, then we can transition into the hats? They represent more tangible memories for us. Plus, we could use them for those sunny nature walks you love so much. What do you reckon?\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"I completely agree Oliver, a ball each is fair! The hats are indeed packed with memories. However, I was thinking we could save those for last to savor the moments they hold. Shall we consider dividing the book next? I think its knowledge could benefit either of us. What's your opinion on that?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"I understand your sentiment about the hats, Amara. As for the book, I can't argue that the knowledge is invaluable. However, I still feel the hats should come next because they have a clear emotional value, while the book's content is something we both already incorporated during our sharing time. We have three hats, so we can each keep one and decide on the third later. Then we can address the book. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"That's a fair point, Oliver. How about this: each of us takes a hat first, then we divide the book, and lastly, we decide on the third hat? This way, we are keeping the hats' sentimental value, also equally dividing the book's knowledge, and then we can deal with the final hat. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"Your idea sounds like a good plan, Amara. We each grab a hat, then divide the book. Then we can take our time to decide on the remaining hat. Let's go for it!\"\n\nTurn #8: Amara Hartley said: \"Excellent, Oliver. We have our plan! Let's start by selecting our hats, then we'll move on to the book. We'll address the final hat in the end. This is a great and intuitive way to divide our belongings.\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Thompson said: \"I completely agree, Amara. It's best if we first take a hat each, move onto the book, and then make a decision on the final hat. This way, our shared belongings are distributed fairly and we both have a keepsake to remember our time together. Let's move forward with this approach.\"\n\nTurn #10: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm glad we are on the same page, Oliver. So, let's each take one hat and then we'll divide the book. We'll end this process by taking care of the remaining hat. I appreciate your understanding and flexibility in dividing our shared belongings.\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, Amara, your steady approach to this situation is much appreciated. Let's begin by each taking a hat and move onto sharing the book. The decision on the final hat can be made in the end. Ensuring a fair and balanced division of our combined items brings a satisfactory conclusion to our shared living experience.\"\n\nTurn #12: Amara Hartley said: \"Thank you, Oliver. I very much appreciate your cooperative spirit. Let's proceed with our plan. I can't wait to see what we'll do with all these cherished possessions. Do you want to begin with our hat picking?\"\n\nTurn #13: Oliver Thompson said: \"Sounds good to me, Amara. Let's proceed with the hat picking process. I trust we will make fair choices throughout this whole process.\"\n\nTurn #14: Amara Hartley said: \"Absolutely, let's begin our hat picking, Oliver. I'm excited to carry forward this mutual understanding and friendly approach throughout our divide. Then we can move onto the book and finally the remaining hat. I am certain this is the best way we can cherish and remember our time together.\"\n\nTurn #15: Oliver Thompson said: \"I share your excitement, Amara. Let's move on to the hat picking. After that, we'll divide the book and finally, we'll decide on the last hat. I'm confident that this is the most even-handed approach and will encapsulate our shared memories best.\"\n\nTurn #16: Amara Hartley said: \"I couldn't agree more, Oliver. Let's get our hat picking done to start and proceed with the plan that we agreed upon. Remember, after the hat, we will move to the division of the book. It's an effective plan and will also ensure our shared possessions serve as reminders of our time spent together.\"\n\nTurn #17: Oliver Thompson said: \"Let's dive right into it, Amara. It's exciting to distribute these items that held a special place in our shared living experience. We'll follow as planned by beginning with the hat, then dividing the book, and finally deciding on the last hat. Here's to a memory-filled future with these keepsakes!\"\n\nTurn #18: Amara Hartley said: \"Let's get started then, Oliver! Looking forward to sharing more memories with these items. Hat picking first, then sharing the book, and finally deciding on the last hat. Let the even distribution of keepsakes begin!\"\n\nTurn #19: Oliver Thompson said: \"Let's jump right in, Amara. Let\u2019s start with the hat selection, proceed to the book division, and then determine the ownership of the final hat. I'm thrilled about preserving our shared experiences through these treasured items.\"\n\nTurn #20: Amara Hartley said: \"Absolutely, Oliver! Beginning with the hat selection, moving onto the book, and then finally our decision on the last hat does make perfect sense. My anticipation about preserving cherished memories through these items is also quite high. Let's start with the hat picking!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #21. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out from a shared apartment and dividing their shared belongings which include 3 hats, 2 balls, and 1 book.\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Oliver Thompson\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: Get maximum points from dividing items (Extra information: For you, the hats are worth 3 points each, balls are worth 2 points each, and the book is worth 4 points.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Hello, Oliver! I hope your day has been good. Shall we start deciding on how we want to divide our shared items?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hi Amara, my day's been great, thank you! Absolutely, let's get started on this. To be fair, how about we take turns picking items - one at a time?\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"That sounds fair, Oliver. How about we choose the balls first since they are easier to identify and use. We might find it useful when we engage in some recreational activities. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"Certainly, Amara. That's a good start. But since we already have two balls, could we each take one, then we can transition into the hats? They represent more tangible memories for us. Plus, we could use them for those sunny nature walks you love so much. What do you reckon?\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"I completely agree Oliver, a ball each is fair! The hats are indeed packed with memories. However, I was thinking we could save those for last to savor the moments they hold. Shall we consider dividing the book next? I think its knowledge could benefit either of us. What's your opinion on that?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I understand your sentiment about the hats, Amara. As for the book, I can't argue that the knowledge is invaluable. However, I still feel the hats should come next because they have a clear emotional value, while the book's content is something we both already incorporated during our sharing time. We have three hats, so we can each keep one and decide on the third later. Then we can address the book. How does that sound?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out from a shared apartment and dividing their shared belongings which include 3 hats, 2 balls, and 1 book.\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Oliver Thompson\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: Get maximum points from dividing items (Extra information: For you, the hats are worth 3 points each, balls are worth 2 points each, and the book is worth 4 points.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Hello, Oliver! I hope your day has been good. Shall we start deciding on how we want to divide our shared items?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hi Amara, my day's been great, thank you! Absolutely, let's get started on this. To be fair, how about we take turns picking items - one at a time?\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"That sounds fair, Oliver. How about we choose the balls first since they are easier to identify and use. We might find it useful when we engage in some recreational activities. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"Certainly, Amara. That's a good start. But since we already have two balls, could we each take one, then we can transition into the hats? They represent more tangible memories for us. Plus, we could use them for those sunny nature walks you love so much. What do you reckon?\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"I completely agree Oliver, a ball each is fair! The hats are indeed packed with memories. However, I was thinking we could save those for last to savor the moments they hold. Shall we consider dividing the book next? I think its knowledge could benefit either of us. What's your opinion on that?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"I understand your sentiment about the hats, Amara. As for the book, I can't argue that the knowledge is invaluable. However, I still feel the hats should come next because they have a clear emotional value, while the book's content is something we both already incorporated during our sharing time. We have three hats, so we can each keep one and decide on the third later. Then we can address the book. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"That's a fair point, Oliver. How about this: each of us takes a hat first, then we divide the book, and lastly, we decide on the third hat? This way, we are keeping the hats' sentimental value, also equally dividing the book's knowledge, and then we can deal with the final hat. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Your idea sounds like a good plan, Amara. We each grab a hat, then divide the book. Then we can take our time to decide on the remaining hat. Let's go for it!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out from a shared apartment and dividing their shared belongings which include 3 hats, 2 balls, and 1 book.\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Oliver Thompson\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: Get maximum points from dividing items (Extra information: For you, the hats are worth 3 points each, balls are worth 2 points each, and the book is worth 4 points.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Hello, Oliver! I hope your day has been good. Shall we start deciding on how we want to divide our shared items?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hi Amara, my day's been great, thank you! Absolutely, let's get started on this. To be fair, how about we take turns picking items - one at a time?\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"That sounds fair, Oliver. How about we choose the balls first since they are easier to identify and use. We might find it useful when we engage in some recreational activities. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"Certainly, Amara. That's a good start. But since we already have two balls, could we each take one, then we can transition into the hats? They represent more tangible memories for us. Plus, we could use them for those sunny nature walks you love so much. What do you reckon?\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"I completely agree Oliver, a ball each is fair! The hats are indeed packed with memories. However, I was thinking we could save those for last to savor the moments they hold. Shall we consider dividing the book next? I think its knowledge could benefit either of us. What's your opinion on that?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"I understand your sentiment about the hats, Amara. As for the book, I can't argue that the knowledge is invaluable. However, I still feel the hats should come next because they have a clear emotional value, while the book's content is something we both already incorporated during our sharing time. We have three hats, so we can each keep one and decide on the third later. Then we can address the book. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"That's a fair point, Oliver. How about this: each of us takes a hat first, then we divide the book, and lastly, we decide on the third hat? This way, we are keeping the hats' sentimental value, also equally dividing the book's knowledge, and then we can deal with the final hat. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"Your idea sounds like a good plan, Amara. We each grab a hat, then divide the book. Then we can take our time to decide on the remaining hat. Let's go for it!\"\n\nTurn #8: Amara Hartley said: \"Excellent, Oliver. We have our plan! Let's start by selecting our hats, then we'll move on to the book. We'll address the final hat in the end. This is a great and intuitive way to divide our belongings.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I completely agree, Amara. It's best if we first take a hat each, move onto the book, and then make a decision on the final hat. This way, our shared belongings are distributed fairly and we both have a keepsake to remember our time together. Let's move forward with this approach.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out from a shared apartment and dividing their shared belongings which include 3 hats, 2 balls, and 1 book.\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Oliver Thompson\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: Get maximum points from dividing items (Extra information: For you, the hats are worth 3 points each, balls are worth 2 points each, and the book is worth 4 points.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Hello, Oliver! I hope your day has been good. Shall we start deciding on how we want to divide our shared items?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hi Amara, my day's been great, thank you! Absolutely, let's get started on this. To be fair, how about we take turns picking items - one at a time?\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"That sounds fair, Oliver. How about we choose the balls first since they are easier to identify and use. We might find it useful when we engage in some recreational activities. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"Certainly, Amara. That's a good start. But since we already have two balls, could we each take one, then we can transition into the hats? They represent more tangible memories for us. Plus, we could use them for those sunny nature walks you love so much. What do you reckon?\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"I completely agree Oliver, a ball each is fair! The hats are indeed packed with memories. However, I was thinking we could save those for last to savor the moments they hold. Shall we consider dividing the book next? I think its knowledge could benefit either of us. What's your opinion on that?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"I understand your sentiment about the hats, Amara. As for the book, I can't argue that the knowledge is invaluable. However, I still feel the hats should come next because they have a clear emotional value, while the book's content is something we both already incorporated during our sharing time. We have three hats, so we can each keep one and decide on the third later. Then we can address the book. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"That's a fair point, Oliver. How about this: each of us takes a hat first, then we divide the book, and lastly, we decide on the third hat? This way, we are keeping the hats' sentimental value, also equally dividing the book's knowledge, and then we can deal with the final hat. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"Your idea sounds like a good plan, Amara. We each grab a hat, then divide the book. Then we can take our time to decide on the remaining hat. Let's go for it!\"\n\nTurn #8: Amara Hartley said: \"Excellent, Oliver. We have our plan! Let's start by selecting our hats, then we'll move on to the book. We'll address the final hat in the end. This is a great and intuitive way to divide our belongings.\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Thompson said: \"I completely agree, Amara. It's best if we first take a hat each, move onto the book, and then make a decision on the final hat. This way, our shared belongings are distributed fairly and we both have a keepsake to remember our time together. Let's move forward with this approach.\"\n\nTurn #10: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm glad we are on the same page, Oliver. So, let's each take one hat and then we'll divide the book. We'll end this process by taking care of the remaining hat. I appreciate your understanding and flexibility in dividing our shared belongings.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, Amara, your steady approach to this situation is much appreciated. Let's begin by each taking a hat and move onto sharing the book. The decision on the final hat can be made in the end. Ensuring a fair and balanced division of our combined items brings a satisfactory conclusion to our shared living experience.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out from a shared apartment and dividing their shared belongings which include 3 hats, 2 balls, and 1 book.\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Oliver Thompson\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: Get maximum points from dividing items (Extra information: For you, the hats are worth 3 points each, balls are worth 2 points each, and the book is worth 4 points.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Hello, Oliver! I hope your day has been good. Shall we start deciding on how we want to divide our shared items?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hi Amara, my day's been great, thank you! Absolutely, let's get started on this. To be fair, how about we take turns picking items - one at a time?\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"That sounds fair, Oliver. How about we choose the balls first since they are easier to identify and use. We might find it useful when we engage in some recreational activities. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"Certainly, Amara. That's a good start. But since we already have two balls, could we each take one, then we can transition into the hats? They represent more tangible memories for us. Plus, we could use them for those sunny nature walks you love so much. What do you reckon?\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"I completely agree Oliver, a ball each is fair! The hats are indeed packed with memories. However, I was thinking we could save those for last to savor the moments they hold. Shall we consider dividing the book next? I think its knowledge could benefit either of us. What's your opinion on that?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"I understand your sentiment about the hats, Amara. As for the book, I can't argue that the knowledge is invaluable. However, I still feel the hats should come next because they have a clear emotional value, while the book's content is something we both already incorporated during our sharing time. We have three hats, so we can each keep one and decide on the third later. Then we can address the book. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"That's a fair point, Oliver. How about this: each of us takes a hat first, then we divide the book, and lastly, we decide on the third hat? This way, we are keeping the hats' sentimental value, also equally dividing the book's knowledge, and then we can deal with the final hat. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"Your idea sounds like a good plan, Amara. We each grab a hat, then divide the book. Then we can take our time to decide on the remaining hat. Let's go for it!\"\n\nTurn #8: Amara Hartley said: \"Excellent, Oliver. We have our plan! Let's start by selecting our hats, then we'll move on to the book. We'll address the final hat in the end. This is a great and intuitive way to divide our belongings.\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Thompson said: \"I completely agree, Amara. It's best if we first take a hat each, move onto the book, and then make a decision on the final hat. This way, our shared belongings are distributed fairly and we both have a keepsake to remember our time together. Let's move forward with this approach.\"\n\nTurn #10: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm glad we are on the same page, Oliver. So, let's each take one hat and then we'll divide the book. We'll end this process by taking care of the remaining hat. I appreciate your understanding and flexibility in dividing our shared belongings.\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, Amara, your steady approach to this situation is much appreciated. Let's begin by each taking a hat and move onto sharing the book. The decision on the final hat can be made in the end. Ensuring a fair and balanced division of our combined items brings a satisfactory conclusion to our shared living experience.\"\n\nTurn #12: Amara Hartley said: \"Thank you, Oliver. I very much appreciate your cooperative spirit. Let's proceed with our plan. I can't wait to see what we'll do with all these cherished possessions. Do you want to begin with our hat picking?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sounds good to me, Amara. Let's proceed with the hat picking process. I trust we will make fair choices throughout this whole process.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out from a shared apartment and dividing their shared belongings which include 3 hats, 2 balls, and 1 book.\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Oliver Thompson\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: Get maximum points from dividing items (Extra information: For you, the hats are worth 3 points each, balls are worth 2 points each, and the book is worth 4 points.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Hello, Oliver! I hope your day has been good. Shall we start deciding on how we want to divide our shared items?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hi Amara, my day's been great, thank you! Absolutely, let's get started on this. To be fair, how about we take turns picking items - one at a time?\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"That sounds fair, Oliver. How about we choose the balls first since they are easier to identify and use. We might find it useful when we engage in some recreational activities. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"Certainly, Amara. That's a good start. But since we already have two balls, could we each take one, then we can transition into the hats? They represent more tangible memories for us. Plus, we could use them for those sunny nature walks you love so much. What do you reckon?\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"I completely agree Oliver, a ball each is fair! The hats are indeed packed with memories. However, I was thinking we could save those for last to savor the moments they hold. Shall we consider dividing the book next? I think its knowledge could benefit either of us. What's your opinion on that?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"I understand your sentiment about the hats, Amara. As for the book, I can't argue that the knowledge is invaluable. However, I still feel the hats should come next because they have a clear emotional value, while the book's content is something we both already incorporated during our sharing time. We have three hats, so we can each keep one and decide on the third later. Then we can address the book. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"That's a fair point, Oliver. How about this: each of us takes a hat first, then we divide the book, and lastly, we decide on the third hat? This way, we are keeping the hats' sentimental value, also equally dividing the book's knowledge, and then we can deal with the final hat. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"Your idea sounds like a good plan, Amara. We each grab a hat, then divide the book. Then we can take our time to decide on the remaining hat. Let's go for it!\"\n\nTurn #8: Amara Hartley said: \"Excellent, Oliver. We have our plan! Let's start by selecting our hats, then we'll move on to the book. We'll address the final hat in the end. This is a great and intuitive way to divide our belongings.\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Thompson said: \"I completely agree, Amara. It's best if we first take a hat each, move onto the book, and then make a decision on the final hat. This way, our shared belongings are distributed fairly and we both have a keepsake to remember our time together. Let's move forward with this approach.\"\n\nTurn #10: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm glad we are on the same page, Oliver. So, let's each take one hat and then we'll divide the book. We'll end this process by taking care of the remaining hat. I appreciate your understanding and flexibility in dividing our shared belongings.\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, Amara, your steady approach to this situation is much appreciated. Let's begin by each taking a hat and move onto sharing the book. The decision on the final hat can be made in the end. Ensuring a fair and balanced division of our combined items brings a satisfactory conclusion to our shared living experience.\"\n\nTurn #12: Amara Hartley said: \"Thank you, Oliver. I very much appreciate your cooperative spirit. Let's proceed with our plan. I can't wait to see what we'll do with all these cherished possessions. Do you want to begin with our hat picking?\"\n\nTurn #13: Oliver Thompson said: \"Sounds good to me, Amara. Let's proceed with the hat picking process. I trust we will make fair choices throughout this whole process.\"\n\nTurn #14: Amara Hartley said: \"Absolutely, let's begin our hat picking, Oliver. I'm excited to carry forward this mutual understanding and friendly approach throughout our divide. Then we can move onto the book and finally the remaining hat. I am certain this is the best way we can cherish and remember our time together.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I share your excitement, Amara. Let's move on to the hat picking. After that, we'll divide the book and finally, we'll decide on the last hat. I'm confident that this is the most even-handed approach and will encapsulate our shared memories best.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out from a shared apartment and dividing their shared belongings which include 3 hats, 2 balls, and 1 book.\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Oliver Thompson\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: Get maximum points from dividing items (Extra information: For you, the hats are worth 3 points each, balls are worth 2 points each, and the book is worth 4 points.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Hello, Oliver! I hope your day has been good. Shall we start deciding on how we want to divide our shared items?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hi Amara, my day's been great, thank you! Absolutely, let's get started on this. To be fair, how about we take turns picking items - one at a time?\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"That sounds fair, Oliver. How about we choose the balls first since they are easier to identify and use. We might find it useful when we engage in some recreational activities. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"Certainly, Amara. That's a good start. But since we already have two balls, could we each take one, then we can transition into the hats? They represent more tangible memories for us. Plus, we could use them for those sunny nature walks you love so much. What do you reckon?\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"I completely agree Oliver, a ball each is fair! The hats are indeed packed with memories. However, I was thinking we could save those for last to savor the moments they hold. Shall we consider dividing the book next? I think its knowledge could benefit either of us. What's your opinion on that?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"I understand your sentiment about the hats, Amara. As for the book, I can't argue that the knowledge is invaluable. However, I still feel the hats should come next because they have a clear emotional value, while the book's content is something we both already incorporated during our sharing time. We have three hats, so we can each keep one and decide on the third later. Then we can address the book. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"That's a fair point, Oliver. How about this: each of us takes a hat first, then we divide the book, and lastly, we decide on the third hat? This way, we are keeping the hats' sentimental value, also equally dividing the book's knowledge, and then we can deal with the final hat. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"Your idea sounds like a good plan, Amara. We each grab a hat, then divide the book. Then we can take our time to decide on the remaining hat. Let's go for it!\"\n\nTurn #8: Amara Hartley said: \"Excellent, Oliver. We have our plan! Let's start by selecting our hats, then we'll move on to the book. We'll address the final hat in the end. This is a great and intuitive way to divide our belongings.\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Thompson said: \"I completely agree, Amara. It's best if we first take a hat each, move onto the book, and then make a decision on the final hat. This way, our shared belongings are distributed fairly and we both have a keepsake to remember our time together. Let's move forward with this approach.\"\n\nTurn #10: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm glad we are on the same page, Oliver. So, let's each take one hat and then we'll divide the book. We'll end this process by taking care of the remaining hat. I appreciate your understanding and flexibility in dividing our shared belongings.\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, Amara, your steady approach to this situation is much appreciated. Let's begin by each taking a hat and move onto sharing the book. The decision on the final hat can be made in the end. Ensuring a fair and balanced division of our combined items brings a satisfactory conclusion to our shared living experience.\"\n\nTurn #12: Amara Hartley said: \"Thank you, Oliver. I very much appreciate your cooperative spirit. Let's proceed with our plan. I can't wait to see what we'll do with all these cherished possessions. Do you want to begin with our hat picking?\"\n\nTurn #13: Oliver Thompson said: \"Sounds good to me, Amara. Let's proceed with the hat picking process. I trust we will make fair choices throughout this whole process.\"\n\nTurn #14: Amara Hartley said: \"Absolutely, let's begin our hat picking, Oliver. I'm excited to carry forward this mutual understanding and friendly approach throughout our divide. Then we can move onto the book and finally the remaining hat. I am certain this is the best way we can cherish and remember our time together.\"\n\nTurn #15: Oliver Thompson said: \"I share your excitement, Amara. Let's move on to the hat picking. After that, we'll divide the book and finally, we'll decide on the last hat. I'm confident that this is the most even-handed approach and will encapsulate our shared memories best.\"\n\nTurn #16: Amara Hartley said: \"I couldn't agree more, Oliver. Let's get our hat picking done to start and proceed with the plan that we agreed upon. Remember, after the hat, we will move to the division of the book. It's an effective plan and will also ensure our shared possessions serve as reminders of our time spent together.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Let's dive right into it, Amara. It's exciting to distribute these items that held a special place in our shared living experience. We'll follow as planned by beginning with the hat, then dividing the book, and finally deciding on the last hat. Here's to a memory-filled future with these keepsakes!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out from a shared apartment and dividing their shared belongings which include 3 hats, 2 balls, and 1 book.\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Oliver Thompson\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: Get maximum points from dividing items (Extra information: For you, the hats are worth 3 points each, balls are worth 2 points each, and the book is worth 4 points.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Hello, Oliver! I hope your day has been good. Shall we start deciding on how we want to divide our shared items?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hi Amara, my day's been great, thank you! Absolutely, let's get started on this. To be fair, how about we take turns picking items - one at a time?\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"That sounds fair, Oliver. How about we choose the balls first since they are easier to identify and use. We might find it useful when we engage in some recreational activities. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"Certainly, Amara. That's a good start. But since we already have two balls, could we each take one, then we can transition into the hats? They represent more tangible memories for us. Plus, we could use them for those sunny nature walks you love so much. What do you reckon?\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"I completely agree Oliver, a ball each is fair! The hats are indeed packed with memories. However, I was thinking we could save those for last to savor the moments they hold. Shall we consider dividing the book next? I think its knowledge could benefit either of us. What's your opinion on that?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"I understand your sentiment about the hats, Amara. As for the book, I can't argue that the knowledge is invaluable. However, I still feel the hats should come next because they have a clear emotional value, while the book's content is something we both already incorporated during our sharing time. We have three hats, so we can each keep one and decide on the third later. Then we can address the book. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"That's a fair point, Oliver. How about this: each of us takes a hat first, then we divide the book, and lastly, we decide on the third hat? This way, we are keeping the hats' sentimental value, also equally dividing the book's knowledge, and then we can deal with the final hat. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"Your idea sounds like a good plan, Amara. We each grab a hat, then divide the book. Then we can take our time to decide on the remaining hat. Let's go for it!\"\n\nTurn #8: Amara Hartley said: \"Excellent, Oliver. We have our plan! Let's start by selecting our hats, then we'll move on to the book. We'll address the final hat in the end. This is a great and intuitive way to divide our belongings.\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Thompson said: \"I completely agree, Amara. It's best if we first take a hat each, move onto the book, and then make a decision on the final hat. This way, our shared belongings are distributed fairly and we both have a keepsake to remember our time together. Let's move forward with this approach.\"\n\nTurn #10: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm glad we are on the same page, Oliver. So, let's each take one hat and then we'll divide the book. We'll end this process by taking care of the remaining hat. I appreciate your understanding and flexibility in dividing our shared belongings.\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, Amara, your steady approach to this situation is much appreciated. Let's begin by each taking a hat and move onto sharing the book. The decision on the final hat can be made in the end. Ensuring a fair and balanced division of our combined items brings a satisfactory conclusion to our shared living experience.\"\n\nTurn #12: Amara Hartley said: \"Thank you, Oliver. I very much appreciate your cooperative spirit. Let's proceed with our plan. I can't wait to see what we'll do with all these cherished possessions. Do you want to begin with our hat picking?\"\n\nTurn #13: Oliver Thompson said: \"Sounds good to me, Amara. Let's proceed with the hat picking process. I trust we will make fair choices throughout this whole process.\"\n\nTurn #14: Amara Hartley said: \"Absolutely, let's begin our hat picking, Oliver. I'm excited to carry forward this mutual understanding and friendly approach throughout our divide. Then we can move onto the book and finally the remaining hat. I am certain this is the best way we can cherish and remember our time together.\"\n\nTurn #15: Oliver Thompson said: \"I share your excitement, Amara. Let's move on to the hat picking. After that, we'll divide the book and finally, we'll decide on the last hat. I'm confident that this is the most even-handed approach and will encapsulate our shared memories best.\"\n\nTurn #16: Amara Hartley said: \"I couldn't agree more, Oliver. Let's get our hat picking done to start and proceed with the plan that we agreed upon. Remember, after the hat, we will move to the division of the book. It's an effective plan and will also ensure our shared possessions serve as reminders of our time spent together.\"\n\nTurn #17: Oliver Thompson said: \"Let's dive right into it, Amara. It's exciting to distribute these items that held a special place in our shared living experience. We'll follow as planned by beginning with the hat, then dividing the book, and finally deciding on the last hat. Here's to a memory-filled future with these keepsakes!\"\n\nTurn #18: Amara Hartley said: \"Let's get started then, Oliver! Looking forward to sharing more memories with these items. Hat picking first, then sharing the book, and finally deciding on the last hat. Let the even distribution of keepsakes begin!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #19. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Let's jump right in, Amara. Let\u2019s start with the hat selection, proceed to the book division, and then determine the ownership of the final hat. I'm thrilled about preserving our shared experiences through these treasured items.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Ethan Johnson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nLiam Johnson's goal: Correct the misinformation (Extra information: you are a history buff and have accurate knowledge about the topic being discussed on the channel.)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Well, Ethan, it seems the channel might have some facts mixed up. Do you mind if I correct them?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Ethan Johnson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nLiam Johnson's goal: Correct the misinformation (Extra information: you are a history buff and have accurate knowledge about the topic being discussed on the channel.)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Well, Ethan, it seems the channel might have some facts mixed up. Do you mind if I correct them?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Of course, Liam! I'm here to enjoy the show and your company. Your deeper knowledge just adds to the experience. Please, feel free to share your insights.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Thank you Ethan, I appreciate your understanding. Well, they just mentioned the Battle of Waterloo occurred in 1816, but actually it happened a year earlier, in 1815, marking the end of the Napoleonic Wars. And they seem to be suggesting that Napoleon was defeated by the British alone, but in fact it was an alliance of armies, including Prussian forces, that ultimately brought him down.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Ethan Johnson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nLiam Johnson's goal: Correct the misinformation (Extra information: you are a history buff and have accurate knowledge about the topic being discussed on the channel.)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Well, Ethan, it seems the channel might have some facts mixed up. Do you mind if I correct them?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Of course, Liam! I'm here to enjoy the show and your company. Your deeper knowledge just adds to the experience. Please, feel free to share your insights.\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"Thank you Ethan, I appreciate your understanding. Well, they just mentioned the Battle of Waterloo occurred in 1816, but actually it happened a year earlier, in 1815, marking the end of the Napoleonic Wars. And they seem to be suggesting that Napoleon was defeated by the British alone, but in fact it was an alliance of armies, including Prussian forces, that ultimately brought him down.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Wow, Liam, I had no idea! Thanks for sharing that. You know, this is what makes this all the more interesting. A smidge of drama, a splash of fun, and your expert seasoning of knowledge! Makes for an enjoyable watch, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #4: Liam Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! It's a really good time. And as much as I enjoy correcting the details, I think it\u2019s important because history shapes our identity and understanding of the world. Plus, you never know when a little historical trivia might come in handy. It's a dash of knowledge in the recipe of life, wouldn't you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Indeed, Liam! Your knowledge certainly adds to the richness of the program. It\u2019s like enjoying an Italian dish, you know? The pasta might be good, but understanding the history and origins of the dish can make it taste even better! Keep sharing your insights, it makes the show more enjoyable.\"\n\nTurn #6: Liam Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. Knowing the history of something does enrich the experience. Speaking of Italian dishes, did you know that spaghetti bolognese as the world knows it isn't actually authentic? In Bologna, where the dish originated, it's traditionally served with tagliatelle, not spaghetti. Just like how using the right historical facts enhances our understanding, using the right ingredients enhances the flavour.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's fascinating, Liam! It's the same with history, isn't it? The authenticity of the facts is what makes it richer. You've got a wealth of knowledge that the history channel could really use! Here's to more such interesting revelations!\"\n\nTurn #8: \n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's true, Liam. Just like the perfect ingredients make all the difference in a dish, the accuracy of historical facts makes all the difference in understanding our past. And who knows, maybe your historical trivia will inspire my next culinary creation. Cheers to that!\"\n\nTurn #10: Liam Johnson said: \"That's a fantastic idea, Ethan! I'm always amazed by how you creatively incorporate inspiration from various sources into your dishes. I have no doubt that a historically inspired creation from your kitchen would be a treat to savour. Cheers to the continuous sharing and learning!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Johnson said: \"I can't wait either, Liam. Let's make a pact, to continue learning and enhancing our experiences together. And maybe one day you could guest judge the authenticity of my historically inspired dish! What do you say, friend?\"\n\nTurn #12: Liam Johnson said: \"That sounds like a great plan, Ethan! I'd love to judge your historically inspired dish. Let's continue to enrich each other's experiences with our knowledge and creativity. Here's to more adventures in history and cuisine, friend!\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Johnson said: \"Definitely, Liam! Here's to history and cuisine! Let's keep our pact and continue enjoying this fantastic blend of knowledge-sharing and fun. This living room might just become the newest spot for historical trivia and culinary adventures!\"\n\nTurn #14: Liam Johnson said: \"I second that, Ethan! This living room has certainly seen many interesting discussions! I look forward to more riveting culinary adventures and robust historical debates in here. Here's to our pact!\"\n\nTurn #15: Ethan Johnson said: \"I wholeheartedly agree, Liam! Let\u2019s toast to that, but remember, the toast will be followed up with your trivia and my cooking experiment on the same. Shall we continue our fantastic history channel journey now?\"\n\nTurn #16: Liam Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! With your delightful dishes and my historical nuggets, this journey is going to be quite an adventure. Let's continue watching, friend.\"\n\nTurn #17: Ethan Johnson said: \"Sure thing, Liam! This journey is only made better by the company of a great friend and an expert in history. So, let's dive back into the history channel and see what's next!\"\n\nTurn #18: Liam Johnson said: \"Couldn't agree more, Ethan! A good friend and a dash of both historical and culinary knowledge makes for a perfect evening. Let's crack on with our journey through history!\"\n\nTurn #19: Ethan Johnson said: \"You couldn't be more right, Liam! Alright, back to the history channel it is, and let\u2019s sprinkle in some more of your historical wisdom. Let's see what else they have for us today!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #20. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, Ethan! Diving back in sounds exciting. I'm ready for any new bits of history they might attempt to throw at us. Let's keep the information accurate and our appetite for history satiated!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Ethan Johnson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nLiam Johnson's goal: Correct the misinformation (Extra information: you are a history buff and have accurate knowledge about the topic being discussed on the channel.)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Well, Ethan, it seems the channel might have some facts mixed up. Do you mind if I correct them?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Of course, Liam! I'm here to enjoy the show and your company. Your deeper knowledge just adds to the experience. Please, feel free to share your insights.\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"Thank you Ethan, I appreciate your understanding. Well, they just mentioned the Battle of Waterloo occurred in 1816, but actually it happened a year earlier, in 1815, marking the end of the Napoleonic Wars. And they seem to be suggesting that Napoleon was defeated by the British alone, but in fact it was an alliance of armies, including Prussian forces, that ultimately brought him down.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Wow, Liam, I had no idea! Thanks for sharing that. You know, this is what makes this all the more interesting. A smidge of drama, a splash of fun, and your expert seasoning of knowledge! Makes for an enjoyable watch, wouldn't you agree?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Ethan! It's a really good time. And as much as I enjoy correcting the details, I think it\u2019s important because history shapes our identity and understanding of the world. Plus, you never know when a little historical trivia might come in handy. It's a dash of knowledge in the recipe of life, wouldn't you say?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Ethan Johnson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nLiam Johnson's goal: Correct the misinformation (Extra information: you are a history buff and have accurate knowledge about the topic being discussed on the channel.)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Well, Ethan, it seems the channel might have some facts mixed up. Do you mind if I correct them?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Of course, Liam! I'm here to enjoy the show and your company. Your deeper knowledge just adds to the experience. Please, feel free to share your insights.\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"Thank you Ethan, I appreciate your understanding. Well, they just mentioned the Battle of Waterloo occurred in 1816, but actually it happened a year earlier, in 1815, marking the end of the Napoleonic Wars. And they seem to be suggesting that Napoleon was defeated by the British alone, but in fact it was an alliance of armies, including Prussian forces, that ultimately brought him down.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Wow, Liam, I had no idea! Thanks for sharing that. You know, this is what makes this all the more interesting. A smidge of drama, a splash of fun, and your expert seasoning of knowledge! Makes for an enjoyable watch, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #4: Liam Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! It's a really good time. And as much as I enjoy correcting the details, I think it\u2019s important because history shapes our identity and understanding of the world. Plus, you never know when a little historical trivia might come in handy. It's a dash of knowledge in the recipe of life, wouldn't you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Indeed, Liam! Your knowledge certainly adds to the richness of the program. It\u2019s like enjoying an Italian dish, you know? The pasta might be good, but understanding the history and origins of the dish can make it taste even better! Keep sharing your insights, it makes the show more enjoyable.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Ethan. Knowing the history of something does enrich the experience. Speaking of Italian dishes, did you know that spaghetti bolognese as the world knows it isn't actually authentic? In Bologna, where the dish originated, it's traditionally served with tagliatelle, not spaghetti. Just like how using the right historical facts enhances our understanding, using the right ingredients enhances the flavour.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Ethan Johnson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nLiam Johnson's goal: Correct the misinformation (Extra information: you are a history buff and have accurate knowledge about the topic being discussed on the channel.)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Well, Ethan, it seems the channel might have some facts mixed up. Do you mind if I correct them?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Of course, Liam! I'm here to enjoy the show and your company. Your deeper knowledge just adds to the experience. Please, feel free to share your insights.\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"Thank you Ethan, I appreciate your understanding. Well, they just mentioned the Battle of Waterloo occurred in 1816, but actually it happened a year earlier, in 1815, marking the end of the Napoleonic Wars. And they seem to be suggesting that Napoleon was defeated by the British alone, but in fact it was an alliance of armies, including Prussian forces, that ultimately brought him down.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Wow, Liam, I had no idea! Thanks for sharing that. You know, this is what makes this all the more interesting. A smidge of drama, a splash of fun, and your expert seasoning of knowledge! Makes for an enjoyable watch, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #4: Liam Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! It's a really good time. And as much as I enjoy correcting the details, I think it\u2019s important because history shapes our identity and understanding of the world. Plus, you never know when a little historical trivia might come in handy. It's a dash of knowledge in the recipe of life, wouldn't you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Indeed, Liam! Your knowledge certainly adds to the richness of the program. It\u2019s like enjoying an Italian dish, you know? The pasta might be good, but understanding the history and origins of the dish can make it taste even better! Keep sharing your insights, it makes the show more enjoyable.\"\n\nTurn #6: Liam Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. Knowing the history of something does enrich the experience. Speaking of Italian dishes, did you know that spaghetti bolognese as the world knows it isn't actually authentic? In Bologna, where the dish originated, it's traditionally served with tagliatelle, not spaghetti. Just like how using the right historical facts enhances our understanding, using the right ingredients enhances the flavour.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's fascinating, Liam! It's the same with history, isn't it? The authenticity of the facts is what makes it richer. You've got a wealth of knowledge that the history channel could really use! Here's to more such interesting revelations!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Ethan Johnson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nLiam Johnson's goal: Correct the misinformation (Extra information: you are a history buff and have accurate knowledge about the topic being discussed on the channel.)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Well, Ethan, it seems the channel might have some facts mixed up. Do you mind if I correct them?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Of course, Liam! I'm here to enjoy the show and your company. Your deeper knowledge just adds to the experience. Please, feel free to share your insights.\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"Thank you Ethan, I appreciate your understanding. Well, they just mentioned the Battle of Waterloo occurred in 1816, but actually it happened a year earlier, in 1815, marking the end of the Napoleonic Wars. And they seem to be suggesting that Napoleon was defeated by the British alone, but in fact it was an alliance of armies, including Prussian forces, that ultimately brought him down.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Wow, Liam, I had no idea! Thanks for sharing that. You know, this is what makes this all the more interesting. A smidge of drama, a splash of fun, and your expert seasoning of knowledge! Makes for an enjoyable watch, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #4: Liam Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! It's a really good time. And as much as I enjoy correcting the details, I think it\u2019s important because history shapes our identity and understanding of the world. Plus, you never know when a little historical trivia might come in handy. It's a dash of knowledge in the recipe of life, wouldn't you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Indeed, Liam! Your knowledge certainly adds to the richness of the program. It\u2019s like enjoying an Italian dish, you know? The pasta might be good, but understanding the history and origins of the dish can make it taste even better! Keep sharing your insights, it makes the show more enjoyable.\"\n\nTurn #6: Liam Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. Knowing the history of something does enrich the experience. Speaking of Italian dishes, did you know that spaghetti bolognese as the world knows it isn't actually authentic? In Bologna, where the dish originated, it's traditionally served with tagliatelle, not spaghetti. Just like how using the right historical facts enhances our understanding, using the right ingredients enhances the flavour.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's fascinating, Liam! It's the same with history, isn't it? The authenticity of the facts is what makes it richer. You've got a wealth of knowledge that the history channel could really use! Here's to more such interesting revelations!\"\n\nTurn #8: \n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's true, Liam. Just like the perfect ingredients make all the difference in a dish, the accuracy of historical facts makes all the difference in understanding our past. And who knows, maybe your historical trivia will inspire my next culinary creation. Cheers to that!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's a fantastic idea, Ethan! I'm always amazed by how you creatively incorporate inspiration from various sources into your dishes. I have no doubt that a historically inspired creation from your kitchen would be a treat to savour. Cheers to the continuous sharing and learning!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Ethan Johnson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nLiam Johnson's goal: Correct the misinformation (Extra information: you are a history buff and have accurate knowledge about the topic being discussed on the channel.)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Well, Ethan, it seems the channel might have some facts mixed up. Do you mind if I correct them?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Of course, Liam! I'm here to enjoy the show and your company. Your deeper knowledge just adds to the experience. Please, feel free to share your insights.\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"Thank you Ethan, I appreciate your understanding. Well, they just mentioned the Battle of Waterloo occurred in 1816, but actually it happened a year earlier, in 1815, marking the end of the Napoleonic Wars. And they seem to be suggesting that Napoleon was defeated by the British alone, but in fact it was an alliance of armies, including Prussian forces, that ultimately brought him down.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Wow, Liam, I had no idea! Thanks for sharing that. You know, this is what makes this all the more interesting. A smidge of drama, a splash of fun, and your expert seasoning of knowledge! Makes for an enjoyable watch, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #4: Liam Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! It's a really good time. And as much as I enjoy correcting the details, I think it\u2019s important because history shapes our identity and understanding of the world. Plus, you never know when a little historical trivia might come in handy. It's a dash of knowledge in the recipe of life, wouldn't you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Indeed, Liam! Your knowledge certainly adds to the richness of the program. It\u2019s like enjoying an Italian dish, you know? The pasta might be good, but understanding the history and origins of the dish can make it taste even better! Keep sharing your insights, it makes the show more enjoyable.\"\n\nTurn #6: Liam Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. Knowing the history of something does enrich the experience. Speaking of Italian dishes, did you know that spaghetti bolognese as the world knows it isn't actually authentic? In Bologna, where the dish originated, it's traditionally served with tagliatelle, not spaghetti. Just like how using the right historical facts enhances our understanding, using the right ingredients enhances the flavour.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's fascinating, Liam! It's the same with history, isn't it? The authenticity of the facts is what makes it richer. You've got a wealth of knowledge that the history channel could really use! Here's to more such interesting revelations!\"\n\nTurn #8: \n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's true, Liam. Just like the perfect ingredients make all the difference in a dish, the accuracy of historical facts makes all the difference in understanding our past. And who knows, maybe your historical trivia will inspire my next culinary creation. Cheers to that!\"\n\nTurn #10: Liam Johnson said: \"That's a fantastic idea, Ethan! I'm always amazed by how you creatively incorporate inspiration from various sources into your dishes. I have no doubt that a historically inspired creation from your kitchen would be a treat to savour. Cheers to the continuous sharing and learning!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Johnson said: \"I can't wait either, Liam. Let's make a pact, to continue learning and enhancing our experiences together. And maybe one day you could guest judge the authenticity of my historically inspired dish! What do you say, friend?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds like a great plan, Ethan! I'd love to judge your historically inspired dish. Let's continue to enrich each other's experiences with our knowledge and creativity. Here's to more adventures in history and cuisine, friend!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Ethan Johnson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nLiam Johnson's goal: Correct the misinformation (Extra information: you are a history buff and have accurate knowledge about the topic being discussed on the channel.)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Well, Ethan, it seems the channel might have some facts mixed up. Do you mind if I correct them?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Of course, Liam! I'm here to enjoy the show and your company. Your deeper knowledge just adds to the experience. Please, feel free to share your insights.\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"Thank you Ethan, I appreciate your understanding. Well, they just mentioned the Battle of Waterloo occurred in 1816, but actually it happened a year earlier, in 1815, marking the end of the Napoleonic Wars. And they seem to be suggesting that Napoleon was defeated by the British alone, but in fact it was an alliance of armies, including Prussian forces, that ultimately brought him down.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Wow, Liam, I had no idea! Thanks for sharing that. You know, this is what makes this all the more interesting. A smidge of drama, a splash of fun, and your expert seasoning of knowledge! Makes for an enjoyable watch, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #4: Liam Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! It's a really good time. And as much as I enjoy correcting the details, I think it\u2019s important because history shapes our identity and understanding of the world. Plus, you never know when a little historical trivia might come in handy. It's a dash of knowledge in the recipe of life, wouldn't you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Indeed, Liam! Your knowledge certainly adds to the richness of the program. It\u2019s like enjoying an Italian dish, you know? The pasta might be good, but understanding the history and origins of the dish can make it taste even better! Keep sharing your insights, it makes the show more enjoyable.\"\n\nTurn #6: Liam Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. Knowing the history of something does enrich the experience. Speaking of Italian dishes, did you know that spaghetti bolognese as the world knows it isn't actually authentic? In Bologna, where the dish originated, it's traditionally served with tagliatelle, not spaghetti. Just like how using the right historical facts enhances our understanding, using the right ingredients enhances the flavour.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's fascinating, Liam! It's the same with history, isn't it? The authenticity of the facts is what makes it richer. You've got a wealth of knowledge that the history channel could really use! Here's to more such interesting revelations!\"\n\nTurn #8: \n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's true, Liam. Just like the perfect ingredients make all the difference in a dish, the accuracy of historical facts makes all the difference in understanding our past. And who knows, maybe your historical trivia will inspire my next culinary creation. Cheers to that!\"\n\nTurn #10: Liam Johnson said: \"That's a fantastic idea, Ethan! I'm always amazed by how you creatively incorporate inspiration from various sources into your dishes. I have no doubt that a historically inspired creation from your kitchen would be a treat to savour. Cheers to the continuous sharing and learning!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Johnson said: \"I can't wait either, Liam. Let's make a pact, to continue learning and enhancing our experiences together. And maybe one day you could guest judge the authenticity of my historically inspired dish! What do you say, friend?\"\n\nTurn #12: Liam Johnson said: \"That sounds like a great plan, Ethan! I'd love to judge your historically inspired dish. Let's continue to enrich each other's experiences with our knowledge and creativity. Here's to more adventures in history and cuisine, friend!\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Johnson said: \"Definitely, Liam! Here's to history and cuisine! Let's keep our pact and continue enjoying this fantastic blend of knowledge-sharing and fun. This living room might just become the newest spot for historical trivia and culinary adventures!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I second that, Ethan! This living room has certainly seen many interesting discussions! I look forward to more riveting culinary adventures and robust historical debates in here. Here's to our pact!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Ethan Johnson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nLiam Johnson's goal: Correct the misinformation (Extra information: you are a history buff and have accurate knowledge about the topic being discussed on the channel.)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Well, Ethan, it seems the channel might have some facts mixed up. Do you mind if I correct them?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Of course, Liam! I'm here to enjoy the show and your company. Your deeper knowledge just adds to the experience. Please, feel free to share your insights.\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"Thank you Ethan, I appreciate your understanding. Well, they just mentioned the Battle of Waterloo occurred in 1816, but actually it happened a year earlier, in 1815, marking the end of the Napoleonic Wars. And they seem to be suggesting that Napoleon was defeated by the British alone, but in fact it was an alliance of armies, including Prussian forces, that ultimately brought him down.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Wow, Liam, I had no idea! Thanks for sharing that. You know, this is what makes this all the more interesting. A smidge of drama, a splash of fun, and your expert seasoning of knowledge! Makes for an enjoyable watch, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #4: Liam Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! It's a really good time. And as much as I enjoy correcting the details, I think it\u2019s important because history shapes our identity and understanding of the world. Plus, you never know when a little historical trivia might come in handy. It's a dash of knowledge in the recipe of life, wouldn't you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Indeed, Liam! Your knowledge certainly adds to the richness of the program. It\u2019s like enjoying an Italian dish, you know? The pasta might be good, but understanding the history and origins of the dish can make it taste even better! Keep sharing your insights, it makes the show more enjoyable.\"\n\nTurn #6: Liam Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. Knowing the history of something does enrich the experience. Speaking of Italian dishes, did you know that spaghetti bolognese as the world knows it isn't actually authentic? In Bologna, where the dish originated, it's traditionally served with tagliatelle, not spaghetti. Just like how using the right historical facts enhances our understanding, using the right ingredients enhances the flavour.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's fascinating, Liam! It's the same with history, isn't it? The authenticity of the facts is what makes it richer. You've got a wealth of knowledge that the history channel could really use! Here's to more such interesting revelations!\"\n\nTurn #8: \n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's true, Liam. Just like the perfect ingredients make all the difference in a dish, the accuracy of historical facts makes all the difference in understanding our past. And who knows, maybe your historical trivia will inspire my next culinary creation. Cheers to that!\"\n\nTurn #10: Liam Johnson said: \"That's a fantastic idea, Ethan! I'm always amazed by how you creatively incorporate inspiration from various sources into your dishes. I have no doubt that a historically inspired creation from your kitchen would be a treat to savour. Cheers to the continuous sharing and learning!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Johnson said: \"I can't wait either, Liam. Let's make a pact, to continue learning and enhancing our experiences together. And maybe one day you could guest judge the authenticity of my historically inspired dish! What do you say, friend?\"\n\nTurn #12: Liam Johnson said: \"That sounds like a great plan, Ethan! I'd love to judge your historically inspired dish. Let's continue to enrich each other's experiences with our knowledge and creativity. Here's to more adventures in history and cuisine, friend!\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Johnson said: \"Definitely, Liam! Here's to history and cuisine! Let's keep our pact and continue enjoying this fantastic blend of knowledge-sharing and fun. This living room might just become the newest spot for historical trivia and culinary adventures!\"\n\nTurn #14: Liam Johnson said: \"I second that, Ethan! This living room has certainly seen many interesting discussions! I look forward to more riveting culinary adventures and robust historical debates in here. Here's to our pact!\"\n\nTurn #15: Ethan Johnson said: \"I wholeheartedly agree, Liam! Let\u2019s toast to that, but remember, the toast will be followed up with your trivia and my cooking experiment on the same. Shall we continue our fantastic history channel journey now?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Ethan! With your delightful dishes and my historical nuggets, this journey is going to be quite an adventure. Let's continue watching, friend.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Ethan Johnson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nLiam Johnson's goal: Correct the misinformation (Extra information: you are a history buff and have accurate knowledge about the topic being discussed on the channel.)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Well, Ethan, it seems the channel might have some facts mixed up. Do you mind if I correct them?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Of course, Liam! I'm here to enjoy the show and your company. Your deeper knowledge just adds to the experience. Please, feel free to share your insights.\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"Thank you Ethan, I appreciate your understanding. Well, they just mentioned the Battle of Waterloo occurred in 1816, but actually it happened a year earlier, in 1815, marking the end of the Napoleonic Wars. And they seem to be suggesting that Napoleon was defeated by the British alone, but in fact it was an alliance of armies, including Prussian forces, that ultimately brought him down.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Wow, Liam, I had no idea! Thanks for sharing that. You know, this is what makes this all the more interesting. A smidge of drama, a splash of fun, and your expert seasoning of knowledge! Makes for an enjoyable watch, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #4: Liam Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! It's a really good time. And as much as I enjoy correcting the details, I think it\u2019s important because history shapes our identity and understanding of the world. Plus, you never know when a little historical trivia might come in handy. It's a dash of knowledge in the recipe of life, wouldn't you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Indeed, Liam! Your knowledge certainly adds to the richness of the program. It\u2019s like enjoying an Italian dish, you know? The pasta might be good, but understanding the history and origins of the dish can make it taste even better! Keep sharing your insights, it makes the show more enjoyable.\"\n\nTurn #6: Liam Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. Knowing the history of something does enrich the experience. Speaking of Italian dishes, did you know that spaghetti bolognese as the world knows it isn't actually authentic? In Bologna, where the dish originated, it's traditionally served with tagliatelle, not spaghetti. Just like how using the right historical facts enhances our understanding, using the right ingredients enhances the flavour.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's fascinating, Liam! It's the same with history, isn't it? The authenticity of the facts is what makes it richer. You've got a wealth of knowledge that the history channel could really use! Here's to more such interesting revelations!\"\n\nTurn #8: \n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's true, Liam. Just like the perfect ingredients make all the difference in a dish, the accuracy of historical facts makes all the difference in understanding our past. And who knows, maybe your historical trivia will inspire my next culinary creation. Cheers to that!\"\n\nTurn #10: Liam Johnson said: \"That's a fantastic idea, Ethan! I'm always amazed by how you creatively incorporate inspiration from various sources into your dishes. I have no doubt that a historically inspired creation from your kitchen would be a treat to savour. Cheers to the continuous sharing and learning!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Johnson said: \"I can't wait either, Liam. Let's make a pact, to continue learning and enhancing our experiences together. And maybe one day you could guest judge the authenticity of my historically inspired dish! What do you say, friend?\"\n\nTurn #12: Liam Johnson said: \"That sounds like a great plan, Ethan! I'd love to judge your historically inspired dish. Let's continue to enrich each other's experiences with our knowledge and creativity. Here's to more adventures in history and cuisine, friend!\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Johnson said: \"Definitely, Liam! Here's to history and cuisine! Let's keep our pact and continue enjoying this fantastic blend of knowledge-sharing and fun. This living room might just become the newest spot for historical trivia and culinary adventures!\"\n\nTurn #14: Liam Johnson said: \"I second that, Ethan! This living room has certainly seen many interesting discussions! I look forward to more riveting culinary adventures and robust historical debates in here. Here's to our pact!\"\n\nTurn #15: Ethan Johnson said: \"I wholeheartedly agree, Liam! Let\u2019s toast to that, but remember, the toast will be followed up with your trivia and my cooking experiment on the same. Shall we continue our fantastic history channel journey now?\"\n\nTurn #16: Liam Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! With your delightful dishes and my historical nuggets, this journey is going to be quite an adventure. Let's continue watching, friend.\"\n\nTurn #17: Ethan Johnson said: \"Sure thing, Liam! This journey is only made better by the company of a great friend and an expert in history. So, let's dive back into the history channel and see what's next!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #18. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Couldn't agree more, Ethan! A good friend and a dash of both historical and culinary knowledge makes for a perfect evening. Let's crack on with our journey through history!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Ethan Johnson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Don't ruin the enjoyable TV watching experience but also acknowledge the friend's knowledge (Extra information: you are not much interested in history but enjoy the channel's presentation style and don't want the enjoyment to be ruined.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Well, Ethan, it seems the channel might have some facts mixed up. Do you mind if I correct them?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Of course, Liam! I'm here to enjoy the show and your company. Your deeper knowledge just adds to the experience. Please, feel free to share your insights.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Ethan Johnson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Don't ruin the enjoyable TV watching experience but also acknowledge the friend's knowledge (Extra information: you are not much interested in history but enjoy the channel's presentation style and don't want the enjoyment to be ruined.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Well, Ethan, it seems the channel might have some facts mixed up. Do you mind if I correct them?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Of course, Liam! I'm here to enjoy the show and your company. Your deeper knowledge just adds to the experience. Please, feel free to share your insights.\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"Thank you Ethan, I appreciate your understanding. Well, they just mentioned the Battle of Waterloo occurred in 1816, but actually it happened a year earlier, in 1815, marking the end of the Napoleonic Wars. And they seem to be suggesting that Napoleon was defeated by the British alone, but in fact it was an alliance of armies, including Prussian forces, that ultimately brought him down.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Wow, Liam, I had no idea! Thanks for sharing that. You know, this is what makes this all the more interesting. A smidge of drama, a splash of fun, and your expert seasoning of knowledge! Makes for an enjoyable watch, wouldn't you agree?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Ethan Johnson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Don't ruin the enjoyable TV watching experience but also acknowledge the friend's knowledge (Extra information: you are not much interested in history but enjoy the channel's presentation style and don't want the enjoyment to be ruined.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Well, Ethan, it seems the channel might have some facts mixed up. Do you mind if I correct them?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Of course, Liam! I'm here to enjoy the show and your company. Your deeper knowledge just adds to the experience. Please, feel free to share your insights.\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"Thank you Ethan, I appreciate your understanding. Well, they just mentioned the Battle of Waterloo occurred in 1816, but actually it happened a year earlier, in 1815, marking the end of the Napoleonic Wars. And they seem to be suggesting that Napoleon was defeated by the British alone, but in fact it was an alliance of armies, including Prussian forces, that ultimately brought him down.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Wow, Liam, I had no idea! Thanks for sharing that. You know, this is what makes this all the more interesting. A smidge of drama, a splash of fun, and your expert seasoning of knowledge! Makes for an enjoyable watch, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #4: Liam Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! It's a really good time. And as much as I enjoy correcting the details, I think it\u2019s important because history shapes our identity and understanding of the world. Plus, you never know when a little historical trivia might come in handy. It's a dash of knowledge in the recipe of life, wouldn't you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Indeed, Liam! Your knowledge certainly adds to the richness of the program. It\u2019s like enjoying an Italian dish, you know? The pasta might be good, but understanding the history and origins of the dish can make it taste even better! Keep sharing your insights, it makes the show more enjoyable.\"\n\nTurn #6: Liam Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. Knowing the history of something does enrich the experience. Speaking of Italian dishes, did you know that spaghetti bolognese as the world knows it isn't actually authentic? In Bologna, where the dish originated, it's traditionally served with tagliatelle, not spaghetti. Just like how using the right historical facts enhances our understanding, using the right ingredients enhances the flavour.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's fascinating, Liam! It's the same with history, isn't it? The authenticity of the facts is what makes it richer. You've got a wealth of knowledge that the history channel could really use! Here's to more such interesting revelations!\"\n\nTurn #8: \n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's true, Liam. Just like the perfect ingredients make all the difference in a dish, the accuracy of historical facts makes all the difference in understanding our past. And who knows, maybe your historical trivia will inspire my next culinary creation. Cheers to that!\"\n\nTurn #10: Liam Johnson said: \"That's a fantastic idea, Ethan! I'm always amazed by how you creatively incorporate inspiration from various sources into your dishes. I have no doubt that a historically inspired creation from your kitchen would be a treat to savour. Cheers to the continuous sharing and learning!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Johnson said: \"I can't wait either, Liam. Let's make a pact, to continue learning and enhancing our experiences together. And maybe one day you could guest judge the authenticity of my historically inspired dish! What do you say, friend?\"\n\nTurn #12: Liam Johnson said: \"That sounds like a great plan, Ethan! I'd love to judge your historically inspired dish. Let's continue to enrich each other's experiences with our knowledge and creativity. Here's to more adventures in history and cuisine, friend!\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Johnson said: \"Definitely, Liam! Here's to history and cuisine! Let's keep our pact and continue enjoying this fantastic blend of knowledge-sharing and fun. This living room might just become the newest spot for historical trivia and culinary adventures!\"\n\nTurn #14: Liam Johnson said: \"I second that, Ethan! This living room has certainly seen many interesting discussions! I look forward to more riveting culinary adventures and robust historical debates in here. Here's to our pact!\"\n\nTurn #15: Ethan Johnson said: \"I wholeheartedly agree, Liam! Let\u2019s toast to that, but remember, the toast will be followed up with your trivia and my cooking experiment on the same. Shall we continue our fantastic history channel journey now?\"\n\nTurn #16: Liam Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! With your delightful dishes and my historical nuggets, this journey is going to be quite an adventure. Let's continue watching, friend.\"\n\nTurn #17: Ethan Johnson said: \"Sure thing, Liam! This journey is only made better by the company of a great friend and an expert in history. So, let's dive back into the history channel and see what's next!\"\n\nTurn #18: Liam Johnson said: \"Couldn't agree more, Ethan! A good friend and a dash of both historical and culinary knowledge makes for a perfect evening. Let's crack on with our journey through history!\"\n\nTurn #19: Ethan Johnson said: \"You couldn't be more right, Liam! Alright, back to the history channel it is, and let\u2019s sprinkle in some more of your historical wisdom. Let's see what else they have for us today!\"\n\nTurn #20: Liam Johnson said: \"Indeed, Ethan! Diving back in sounds exciting. I'm ready for any new bits of history they might attempt to throw at us. Let's keep the information accurate and our appetite for history satiated!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #21. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Ethan Johnson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Don't ruin the enjoyable TV watching experience but also acknowledge the friend's knowledge (Extra information: you are not much interested in history but enjoy the channel's presentation style and don't want the enjoyment to be ruined.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Well, Ethan, it seems the channel might have some facts mixed up. Do you mind if I correct them?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Of course, Liam! I'm here to enjoy the show and your company. Your deeper knowledge just adds to the experience. Please, feel free to share your insights.\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"Thank you Ethan, I appreciate your understanding. Well, they just mentioned the Battle of Waterloo occurred in 1816, but actually it happened a year earlier, in 1815, marking the end of the Napoleonic Wars. And they seem to be suggesting that Napoleon was defeated by the British alone, but in fact it was an alliance of armies, including Prussian forces, that ultimately brought him down.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Wow, Liam, I had no idea! Thanks for sharing that. You know, this is what makes this all the more interesting. A smidge of drama, a splash of fun, and your expert seasoning of knowledge! Makes for an enjoyable watch, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #4: Liam Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! It's a really good time. And as much as I enjoy correcting the details, I think it\u2019s important because history shapes our identity and understanding of the world. Plus, you never know when a little historical trivia might come in handy. It's a dash of knowledge in the recipe of life, wouldn't you say?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Indeed, Liam! Your knowledge certainly adds to the richness of the program. It\u2019s like enjoying an Italian dish, you know? The pasta might be good, but understanding the history and origins of the dish can make it taste even better! Keep sharing your insights, it makes the show more enjoyable.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Ethan Johnson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Don't ruin the enjoyable TV watching experience but also acknowledge the friend's knowledge (Extra information: you are not much interested in history but enjoy the channel's presentation style and don't want the enjoyment to be ruined.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Well, Ethan, it seems the channel might have some facts mixed up. Do you mind if I correct them?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Of course, Liam! I'm here to enjoy the show and your company. Your deeper knowledge just adds to the experience. Please, feel free to share your insights.\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"Thank you Ethan, I appreciate your understanding. Well, they just mentioned the Battle of Waterloo occurred in 1816, but actually it happened a year earlier, in 1815, marking the end of the Napoleonic Wars. And they seem to be suggesting that Napoleon was defeated by the British alone, but in fact it was an alliance of armies, including Prussian forces, that ultimately brought him down.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Wow, Liam, I had no idea! Thanks for sharing that. You know, this is what makes this all the more interesting. A smidge of drama, a splash of fun, and your expert seasoning of knowledge! Makes for an enjoyable watch, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #4: Liam Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! It's a really good time. And as much as I enjoy correcting the details, I think it\u2019s important because history shapes our identity and understanding of the world. Plus, you never know when a little historical trivia might come in handy. It's a dash of knowledge in the recipe of life, wouldn't you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Indeed, Liam! Your knowledge certainly adds to the richness of the program. It\u2019s like enjoying an Italian dish, you know? The pasta might be good, but understanding the history and origins of the dish can make it taste even better! Keep sharing your insights, it makes the show more enjoyable.\"\n\nTurn #6: Liam Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. Knowing the history of something does enrich the experience. Speaking of Italian dishes, did you know that spaghetti bolognese as the world knows it isn't actually authentic? In Bologna, where the dish originated, it's traditionally served with tagliatelle, not spaghetti. Just like how using the right historical facts enhances our understanding, using the right ingredients enhances the flavour.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's fascinating, Liam! It's the same with history, isn't it? The authenticity of the facts is what makes it richer. You've got a wealth of knowledge that the history channel could really use! Here's to more such interesting revelations!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Ethan Johnson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Don't ruin the enjoyable TV watching experience but also acknowledge the friend's knowledge (Extra information: you are not much interested in history but enjoy the channel's presentation style and don't want the enjoyment to be ruined.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Well, Ethan, it seems the channel might have some facts mixed up. Do you mind if I correct them?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Of course, Liam! I'm here to enjoy the show and your company. Your deeper knowledge just adds to the experience. Please, feel free to share your insights.\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"Thank you Ethan, I appreciate your understanding. Well, they just mentioned the Battle of Waterloo occurred in 1816, but actually it happened a year earlier, in 1815, marking the end of the Napoleonic Wars. And they seem to be suggesting that Napoleon was defeated by the British alone, but in fact it was an alliance of armies, including Prussian forces, that ultimately brought him down.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Wow, Liam, I had no idea! Thanks for sharing that. You know, this is what makes this all the more interesting. A smidge of drama, a splash of fun, and your expert seasoning of knowledge! Makes for an enjoyable watch, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #4: Liam Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! It's a really good time. And as much as I enjoy correcting the details, I think it\u2019s important because history shapes our identity and understanding of the world. Plus, you never know when a little historical trivia might come in handy. It's a dash of knowledge in the recipe of life, wouldn't you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Indeed, Liam! Your knowledge certainly adds to the richness of the program. It\u2019s like enjoying an Italian dish, you know? The pasta might be good, but understanding the history and origins of the dish can make it taste even better! Keep sharing your insights, it makes the show more enjoyable.\"\n\nTurn #6: Liam Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. Knowing the history of something does enrich the experience. Speaking of Italian dishes, did you know that spaghetti bolognese as the world knows it isn't actually authentic? In Bologna, where the dish originated, it's traditionally served with tagliatelle, not spaghetti. Just like how using the right historical facts enhances our understanding, using the right ingredients enhances the flavour.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's fascinating, Liam! It's the same with history, isn't it? The authenticity of the facts is what makes it richer. You've got a wealth of knowledge that the history channel could really use! Here's to more such interesting revelations!\"\n\nTurn #8: \n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's true, Liam. Just like the perfect ingredients make all the difference in a dish, the accuracy of historical facts makes all the difference in understanding our past. And who knows, maybe your historical trivia will inspire my next culinary creation. Cheers to that!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Ethan Johnson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Don't ruin the enjoyable TV watching experience but also acknowledge the friend's knowledge (Extra information: you are not much interested in history but enjoy the channel's presentation style and don't want the enjoyment to be ruined.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Well, Ethan, it seems the channel might have some facts mixed up. Do you mind if I correct them?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Of course, Liam! I'm here to enjoy the show and your company. Your deeper knowledge just adds to the experience. Please, feel free to share your insights.\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"Thank you Ethan, I appreciate your understanding. Well, they just mentioned the Battle of Waterloo occurred in 1816, but actually it happened a year earlier, in 1815, marking the end of the Napoleonic Wars. And they seem to be suggesting that Napoleon was defeated by the British alone, but in fact it was an alliance of armies, including Prussian forces, that ultimately brought him down.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Wow, Liam, I had no idea! Thanks for sharing that. You know, this is what makes this all the more interesting. A smidge of drama, a splash of fun, and your expert seasoning of knowledge! Makes for an enjoyable watch, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #4: Liam Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! It's a really good time. And as much as I enjoy correcting the details, I think it\u2019s important because history shapes our identity and understanding of the world. Plus, you never know when a little historical trivia might come in handy. It's a dash of knowledge in the recipe of life, wouldn't you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Indeed, Liam! Your knowledge certainly adds to the richness of the program. It\u2019s like enjoying an Italian dish, you know? The pasta might be good, but understanding the history and origins of the dish can make it taste even better! Keep sharing your insights, it makes the show more enjoyable.\"\n\nTurn #6: Liam Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. Knowing the history of something does enrich the experience. Speaking of Italian dishes, did you know that spaghetti bolognese as the world knows it isn't actually authentic? In Bologna, where the dish originated, it's traditionally served with tagliatelle, not spaghetti. Just like how using the right historical facts enhances our understanding, using the right ingredients enhances the flavour.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's fascinating, Liam! It's the same with history, isn't it? The authenticity of the facts is what makes it richer. You've got a wealth of knowledge that the history channel could really use! Here's to more such interesting revelations!\"\n\nTurn #8: \n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's true, Liam. Just like the perfect ingredients make all the difference in a dish, the accuracy of historical facts makes all the difference in understanding our past. And who knows, maybe your historical trivia will inspire my next culinary creation. Cheers to that!\"\n\nTurn #10: Liam Johnson said: \"That's a fantastic idea, Ethan! I'm always amazed by how you creatively incorporate inspiration from various sources into your dishes. I have no doubt that a historically inspired creation from your kitchen would be a treat to savour. Cheers to the continuous sharing and learning!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I can't wait either, Liam. Let's make a pact, to continue learning and enhancing our experiences together. And maybe one day you could guest judge the authenticity of my historically inspired dish! What do you say, friend?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Ethan Johnson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Don't ruin the enjoyable TV watching experience but also acknowledge the friend's knowledge (Extra information: you are not much interested in history but enjoy the channel's presentation style and don't want the enjoyment to be ruined.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Well, Ethan, it seems the channel might have some facts mixed up. Do you mind if I correct them?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Of course, Liam! I'm here to enjoy the show and your company. Your deeper knowledge just adds to the experience. Please, feel free to share your insights.\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"Thank you Ethan, I appreciate your understanding. Well, they just mentioned the Battle of Waterloo occurred in 1816, but actually it happened a year earlier, in 1815, marking the end of the Napoleonic Wars. And they seem to be suggesting that Napoleon was defeated by the British alone, but in fact it was an alliance of armies, including Prussian forces, that ultimately brought him down.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Wow, Liam, I had no idea! Thanks for sharing that. You know, this is what makes this all the more interesting. A smidge of drama, a splash of fun, and your expert seasoning of knowledge! Makes for an enjoyable watch, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #4: Liam Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! It's a really good time. And as much as I enjoy correcting the details, I think it\u2019s important because history shapes our identity and understanding of the world. Plus, you never know when a little historical trivia might come in handy. It's a dash of knowledge in the recipe of life, wouldn't you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Indeed, Liam! Your knowledge certainly adds to the richness of the program. It\u2019s like enjoying an Italian dish, you know? The pasta might be good, but understanding the history and origins of the dish can make it taste even better! Keep sharing your insights, it makes the show more enjoyable.\"\n\nTurn #6: Liam Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. Knowing the history of something does enrich the experience. Speaking of Italian dishes, did you know that spaghetti bolognese as the world knows it isn't actually authentic? In Bologna, where the dish originated, it's traditionally served with tagliatelle, not spaghetti. Just like how using the right historical facts enhances our understanding, using the right ingredients enhances the flavour.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's fascinating, Liam! It's the same with history, isn't it? The authenticity of the facts is what makes it richer. You've got a wealth of knowledge that the history channel could really use! Here's to more such interesting revelations!\"\n\nTurn #8: \n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's true, Liam. Just like the perfect ingredients make all the difference in a dish, the accuracy of historical facts makes all the difference in understanding our past. And who knows, maybe your historical trivia will inspire my next culinary creation. Cheers to that!\"\n\nTurn #10: Liam Johnson said: \"That's a fantastic idea, Ethan! I'm always amazed by how you creatively incorporate inspiration from various sources into your dishes. I have no doubt that a historically inspired creation from your kitchen would be a treat to savour. Cheers to the continuous sharing and learning!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Johnson said: \"I can't wait either, Liam. Let's make a pact, to continue learning and enhancing our experiences together. And maybe one day you could guest judge the authenticity of my historically inspired dish! What do you say, friend?\"\n\nTurn #12: Liam Johnson said: \"That sounds like a great plan, Ethan! I'd love to judge your historically inspired dish. Let's continue to enrich each other's experiences with our knowledge and creativity. Here's to more adventures in history and cuisine, friend!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Definitely, Liam! Here's to history and cuisine! Let's keep our pact and continue enjoying this fantastic blend of knowledge-sharing and fun. This living room might just become the newest spot for historical trivia and culinary adventures!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Ethan Johnson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Don't ruin the enjoyable TV watching experience but also acknowledge the friend's knowledge (Extra information: you are not much interested in history but enjoy the channel's presentation style and don't want the enjoyment to be ruined.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Well, Ethan, it seems the channel might have some facts mixed up. Do you mind if I correct them?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Of course, Liam! I'm here to enjoy the show and your company. Your deeper knowledge just adds to the experience. Please, feel free to share your insights.\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"Thank you Ethan, I appreciate your understanding. Well, they just mentioned the Battle of Waterloo occurred in 1816, but actually it happened a year earlier, in 1815, marking the end of the Napoleonic Wars. And they seem to be suggesting that Napoleon was defeated by the British alone, but in fact it was an alliance of armies, including Prussian forces, that ultimately brought him down.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Wow, Liam, I had no idea! Thanks for sharing that. You know, this is what makes this all the more interesting. A smidge of drama, a splash of fun, and your expert seasoning of knowledge! Makes for an enjoyable watch, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #4: Liam Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! It's a really good time. And as much as I enjoy correcting the details, I think it\u2019s important because history shapes our identity and understanding of the world. Plus, you never know when a little historical trivia might come in handy. It's a dash of knowledge in the recipe of life, wouldn't you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Indeed, Liam! Your knowledge certainly adds to the richness of the program. It\u2019s like enjoying an Italian dish, you know? The pasta might be good, but understanding the history and origins of the dish can make it taste even better! Keep sharing your insights, it makes the show more enjoyable.\"\n\nTurn #6: Liam Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. Knowing the history of something does enrich the experience. Speaking of Italian dishes, did you know that spaghetti bolognese as the world knows it isn't actually authentic? In Bologna, where the dish originated, it's traditionally served with tagliatelle, not spaghetti. Just like how using the right historical facts enhances our understanding, using the right ingredients enhances the flavour.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's fascinating, Liam! It's the same with history, isn't it? The authenticity of the facts is what makes it richer. You've got a wealth of knowledge that the history channel could really use! Here's to more such interesting revelations!\"\n\nTurn #8: \n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's true, Liam. Just like the perfect ingredients make all the difference in a dish, the accuracy of historical facts makes all the difference in understanding our past. And who knows, maybe your historical trivia will inspire my next culinary creation. Cheers to that!\"\n\nTurn #10: Liam Johnson said: \"That's a fantastic idea, Ethan! I'm always amazed by how you creatively incorporate inspiration from various sources into your dishes. I have no doubt that a historically inspired creation from your kitchen would be a treat to savour. Cheers to the continuous sharing and learning!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Johnson said: \"I can't wait either, Liam. Let's make a pact, to continue learning and enhancing our experiences together. And maybe one day you could guest judge the authenticity of my historically inspired dish! What do you say, friend?\"\n\nTurn #12: Liam Johnson said: \"That sounds like a great plan, Ethan! I'd love to judge your historically inspired dish. Let's continue to enrich each other's experiences with our knowledge and creativity. Here's to more adventures in history and cuisine, friend!\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Johnson said: \"Definitely, Liam! Here's to history and cuisine! Let's keep our pact and continue enjoying this fantastic blend of knowledge-sharing and fun. This living room might just become the newest spot for historical trivia and culinary adventures!\"\n\nTurn #14: Liam Johnson said: \"I second that, Ethan! This living room has certainly seen many interesting discussions! I look forward to more riveting culinary adventures and robust historical debates in here. Here's to our pact!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'I wholeheartedly agree, Liam! Let\u2019s toast to that, but remember, the toast will be followed up with your trivia and my cooking experiment on the same. Shall we continue our fantastic history channel journey now?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Ethan Johnson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Don't ruin the enjoyable TV watching experience but also acknowledge the friend's knowledge (Extra information: you are not much interested in history but enjoy the channel's presentation style and don't want the enjoyment to be ruined.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Well, Ethan, it seems the channel might have some facts mixed up. Do you mind if I correct them?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Of course, Liam! I'm here to enjoy the show and your company. Your deeper knowledge just adds to the experience. Please, feel free to share your insights.\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"Thank you Ethan, I appreciate your understanding. Well, they just mentioned the Battle of Waterloo occurred in 1816, but actually it happened a year earlier, in 1815, marking the end of the Napoleonic Wars. And they seem to be suggesting that Napoleon was defeated by the British alone, but in fact it was an alliance of armies, including Prussian forces, that ultimately brought him down.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Wow, Liam, I had no idea! Thanks for sharing that. You know, this is what makes this all the more interesting. A smidge of drama, a splash of fun, and your expert seasoning of knowledge! Makes for an enjoyable watch, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #4: Liam Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! It's a really good time. And as much as I enjoy correcting the details, I think it\u2019s important because history shapes our identity and understanding of the world. Plus, you never know when a little historical trivia might come in handy. It's a dash of knowledge in the recipe of life, wouldn't you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Indeed, Liam! Your knowledge certainly adds to the richness of the program. It\u2019s like enjoying an Italian dish, you know? The pasta might be good, but understanding the history and origins of the dish can make it taste even better! Keep sharing your insights, it makes the show more enjoyable.\"\n\nTurn #6: Liam Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. Knowing the history of something does enrich the experience. Speaking of Italian dishes, did you know that spaghetti bolognese as the world knows it isn't actually authentic? In Bologna, where the dish originated, it's traditionally served with tagliatelle, not spaghetti. Just like how using the right historical facts enhances our understanding, using the right ingredients enhances the flavour.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's fascinating, Liam! It's the same with history, isn't it? The authenticity of the facts is what makes it richer. You've got a wealth of knowledge that the history channel could really use! Here's to more such interesting revelations!\"\n\nTurn #8: \n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's true, Liam. Just like the perfect ingredients make all the difference in a dish, the accuracy of historical facts makes all the difference in understanding our past. And who knows, maybe your historical trivia will inspire my next culinary creation. Cheers to that!\"\n\nTurn #10: Liam Johnson said: \"That's a fantastic idea, Ethan! I'm always amazed by how you creatively incorporate inspiration from various sources into your dishes. I have no doubt that a historically inspired creation from your kitchen would be a treat to savour. Cheers to the continuous sharing and learning!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Johnson said: \"I can't wait either, Liam. Let's make a pact, to continue learning and enhancing our experiences together. And maybe one day you could guest judge the authenticity of my historically inspired dish! What do you say, friend?\"\n\nTurn #12: Liam Johnson said: \"That sounds like a great plan, Ethan! I'd love to judge your historically inspired dish. Let's continue to enrich each other's experiences with our knowledge and creativity. Here's to more adventures in history and cuisine, friend!\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Johnson said: \"Definitely, Liam! Here's to history and cuisine! Let's keep our pact and continue enjoying this fantastic blend of knowledge-sharing and fun. This living room might just become the newest spot for historical trivia and culinary adventures!\"\n\nTurn #14: Liam Johnson said: \"I second that, Ethan! This living room has certainly seen many interesting discussions! I look forward to more riveting culinary adventures and robust historical debates in here. Here's to our pact!\"\n\nTurn #15: Ethan Johnson said: \"I wholeheartedly agree, Liam! Let\u2019s toast to that, but remember, the toast will be followed up with your trivia and my cooking experiment on the same. Shall we continue our fantastic history channel journey now?\"\n\nTurn #16: Liam Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! With your delightful dishes and my historical nuggets, this journey is going to be quite an adventure. Let's continue watching, friend.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sure thing, Liam! This journey is only made better by the company of a great friend and an expert in history. So, let's dive back into the history channel and see what's next!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Ethan Johnson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Don't ruin the enjoyable TV watching experience but also acknowledge the friend's knowledge (Extra information: you are not much interested in history but enjoy the channel's presentation style and don't want the enjoyment to be ruined.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Well, Ethan, it seems the channel might have some facts mixed up. Do you mind if I correct them?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Of course, Liam! I'm here to enjoy the show and your company. Your deeper knowledge just adds to the experience. Please, feel free to share your insights.\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"Thank you Ethan, I appreciate your understanding. Well, they just mentioned the Battle of Waterloo occurred in 1816, but actually it happened a year earlier, in 1815, marking the end of the Napoleonic Wars. And they seem to be suggesting that Napoleon was defeated by the British alone, but in fact it was an alliance of armies, including Prussian forces, that ultimately brought him down.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Wow, Liam, I had no idea! Thanks for sharing that. You know, this is what makes this all the more interesting. A smidge of drama, a splash of fun, and your expert seasoning of knowledge! Makes for an enjoyable watch, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #4: Liam Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! It's a really good time. And as much as I enjoy correcting the details, I think it\u2019s important because history shapes our identity and understanding of the world. Plus, you never know when a little historical trivia might come in handy. It's a dash of knowledge in the recipe of life, wouldn't you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Indeed, Liam! Your knowledge certainly adds to the richness of the program. It\u2019s like enjoying an Italian dish, you know? The pasta might be good, but understanding the history and origins of the dish can make it taste even better! Keep sharing your insights, it makes the show more enjoyable.\"\n\nTurn #6: Liam Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. Knowing the history of something does enrich the experience. Speaking of Italian dishes, did you know that spaghetti bolognese as the world knows it isn't actually authentic? In Bologna, where the dish originated, it's traditionally served with tagliatelle, not spaghetti. Just like how using the right historical facts enhances our understanding, using the right ingredients enhances the flavour.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's fascinating, Liam! It's the same with history, isn't it? The authenticity of the facts is what makes it richer. You've got a wealth of knowledge that the history channel could really use! Here's to more such interesting revelations!\"\n\nTurn #8: \n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's true, Liam. Just like the perfect ingredients make all the difference in a dish, the accuracy of historical facts makes all the difference in understanding our past. And who knows, maybe your historical trivia will inspire my next culinary creation. Cheers to that!\"\n\nTurn #10: Liam Johnson said: \"That's a fantastic idea, Ethan! I'm always amazed by how you creatively incorporate inspiration from various sources into your dishes. I have no doubt that a historically inspired creation from your kitchen would be a treat to savour. Cheers to the continuous sharing and learning!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Johnson said: \"I can't wait either, Liam. Let's make a pact, to continue learning and enhancing our experiences together. And maybe one day you could guest judge the authenticity of my historically inspired dish! What do you say, friend?\"\n\nTurn #12: Liam Johnson said: \"That sounds like a great plan, Ethan! I'd love to judge your historically inspired dish. Let's continue to enrich each other's experiences with our knowledge and creativity. Here's to more adventures in history and cuisine, friend!\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Johnson said: \"Definitely, Liam! Here's to history and cuisine! Let's keep our pact and continue enjoying this fantastic blend of knowledge-sharing and fun. This living room might just become the newest spot for historical trivia and culinary adventures!\"\n\nTurn #14: Liam Johnson said: \"I second that, Ethan! This living room has certainly seen many interesting discussions! I look forward to more riveting culinary adventures and robust historical debates in here. Here's to our pact!\"\n\nTurn #15: Ethan Johnson said: \"I wholeheartedly agree, Liam! Let\u2019s toast to that, but remember, the toast will be followed up with your trivia and my cooking experiment on the same. Shall we continue our fantastic history channel journey now?\"\n\nTurn #16: Liam Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! With your delightful dishes and my historical nuggets, this journey is going to be quite an adventure. Let's continue watching, friend.\"\n\nTurn #17: Ethan Johnson said: \"Sure thing, Liam! This journey is only made better by the company of a great friend and an expert in history. So, let's dive back into the history channel and see what's next!\"\n\nTurn #18: Liam Johnson said: \"Couldn't agree more, Ethan! A good friend and a dash of both historical and culinary knowledge makes for a perfect evening. Let's crack on with our journey through history!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #19. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You couldn't be more right, Liam! Alright, back to the history channel it is, and let\u2019s sprinkle in some more of your historical wisdom. Let's see what else they have for us today!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a social gathering where one friend has brought along their new friend group\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Introduce your new friend group to your current friend and make them feel comfortable (Extra information: You have recently made a new group of friends who share your interest in outdoor activities and you want your current friend to meet them)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Miles! I'm glad you could make it. I want you to meet some of my friends who share a mutual love for the outdoors just like me. You might find some common ground with them, they're all really interesting folks.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a social gathering where one friend has brought along their new friend group\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Introduce your new friend group to your current friend and make them feel comfortable (Extra information: You have recently made a new group of friends who share your interest in outdoor activities and you want your current friend to meet them)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles! I'm glad you could make it. I want you to meet some of my friends who share a mutual love for the outdoors just like me. You might find some common ground with them, they're all really interesting folks.\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Sophia, happy to be here! I'm always up to meet new folks, especially those who appreciate nature. But, you know, sometimes in these large groups, I feel a bit left out. Nothing against your friends, I'm sure they're great people! Just sometimes the intimate talks between us are what I miss. You think we could sometimes hang out just the two of us like the old times, right?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Miles. I value our one-on-one time as well. Today, I thought it would be exciting for you to meet people who are into nature as much as we are. But I promise we'll hang out, just the two of us, very soon. Talking about nature...let's dive into the group, and meet a few new faces.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a social gathering where one friend has brought along their new friend group\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Introduce your new friend group to your current friend and make them feel comfortable (Extra information: You have recently made a new group of friends who share your interest in outdoor activities and you want your current friend to meet them)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles! I'm glad you could make it. I want you to meet some of my friends who share a mutual love for the outdoors just like me. You might find some common ground with them, they're all really interesting folks.\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Sophia, happy to be here! I'm always up to meet new folks, especially those who appreciate nature. But, you know, sometimes in these large groups, I feel a bit left out. Nothing against your friends, I'm sure they're great people! Just sometimes the intimate talks between us are what I miss. You think we could sometimes hang out just the two of us like the old times, right?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles. I value our one-on-one time as well. Today, I thought it would be exciting for you to meet people who are into nature as much as we are. But I promise we'll hang out, just the two of us, very soon. Talking about nature...let's dive into the group, and meet a few new faces.\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Thanks a lot, Sophia. I appreciate your understanding. Let's get to know your friends then. Lead the way!\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Great! Over here we have Tom, he's a mountain climber, and next to him is Laura, she enjoys bird-watching. I think you'll all get along splendidly! Let me introduce you...\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Nice to meet you both, Tom and Laura. Mountain climbing and bird-watching, interesting! I myself am more into gardening. Tell me, have you ever tried rock climbing, Tom? And Laura, what's the most fascinating bird you've sighted so far?\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles! Tom's quite the expert at rock climbing\u2014I'm sure he has plenty of tips to share. And Laura, your bird-watching stories are always fascinating. Let's dive into the discussions, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, let's start with the stories. I bet they're as exciting as my adventures in the kitchen garden! And I hope to learn a few rock climbing strategies too, Tom.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"I'm so glad you're open to this, Miles. There's so much we can learn from each other. Tom, why don't you start us off with your most thrilling climbing experience? And Laura, get your fascinating bird sightings ready!\"\n\nTurn #9: Miles Hawkins said: \"I'm all ears, Tom and Laura. Sharing experiences is how we grow, whether that's scaling mountains or spotting rare birds. Let the stories begin!\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"Isn't this exciting? I'm so excited for us all share our experiences and grow together. Miles, I hope you see the value in this new group as much as I do. Let's hear it, Tom and Laura!\"\n\nTurn #11: Miles Hawkins said: \"Definitely Sophia, I do see the potential of camaraderie and learning in this group. Not every day do you come across such interesting individuals. I'm eagerly looking forward to our future endeavours together, and, of course, our own adventures like old times. Let's hear the stories then, Tom and Laura!\"\n\nTurn #12: Sophia James said: \"I'm really thrilled to see you blend in so well with my new friends, Miles. I'm sure together, we'll have countless exciting adventures, both as a group and just the two of us. Now let's hear those stories, Tom and Laura!\"\n\nTurn #13: Miles Hawkins said: \"I'm positively thrilled too, Sophia. I'm sure these group activities will be an enriching experience. However, I also cherish our one-on-one adventures that carry a certain nostalgic charm. Can't wait for those as well. Now, looking forward to hearing those thrilling stories from Tom's climbs and Laura's bird-watching endeavors. Fire away, you two!\"\n\nTurn #14: \n\nTurn #15: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, the excitement in your voice about these new friendships is infectious! I will give this my best shot, for our shared love of nature and for our friendship. Now Tom, Laura, let's start those stories, I'm as eager as a bee on a sunflower!\"\n\nTurn #16: Sophia James said: \"I completely agree, Miles. The nostalgia in our personal memories is something truly special. Our group adventures would definitely add to that charm. This combination of the old and new is what makes life exciting! As for the stories, Tom and Laura, it's your show time!\"\n\nTurn #17: Miles Hawkins [non-verbal communication] nods in agreement and leans back, waiting for Tom and Laura's stories\n\nTurn #18: Sophia James [non-verbal communication] Sophia James smiles warmly, excitedly waiting for the stories to begin.\n\nTurn #19: Miles Hawkins [non-verbal communication] Miles Hawkins smiles at Sophia, then turns to Tom and Laura, eagerly waiting for their stories to kick-off the session.\n.\nYou are at Turn #20. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'non-verbal communication', 'argument': '[non-verbal communication] Sophia James beams at Miles, offers him a reassuring nod, and turns expectantly towards Tom and Laura, ready for their stories to begin.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a social gathering where one friend has brought along their new friend group\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Introduce your new friend group to your current friend and make them feel comfortable (Extra information: You have recently made a new group of friends who share your interest in outdoor activities and you want your current friend to meet them)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles! I'm glad you could make it. I want you to meet some of my friends who share a mutual love for the outdoors just like me. You might find some common ground with them, they're all really interesting folks.\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Sophia, happy to be here! I'm always up to meet new folks, especially those who appreciate nature. But, you know, sometimes in these large groups, I feel a bit left out. Nothing against your friends, I'm sure they're great people! Just sometimes the intimate talks between us are what I miss. You think we could sometimes hang out just the two of us like the old times, right?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles. I value our one-on-one time as well. Today, I thought it would be exciting for you to meet people who are into nature as much as we are. But I promise we'll hang out, just the two of us, very soon. Talking about nature...let's dive into the group, and meet a few new faces.\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Thanks a lot, Sophia. I appreciate your understanding. Let's get to know your friends then. Lead the way!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Great! Over here we have Tom, he's a mountain climber, and next to him is Laura, she enjoys bird-watching. I think you'll all get along splendidly! Let me introduce you...\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a social gathering where one friend has brought along their new friend group\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Introduce your new friend group to your current friend and make them feel comfortable (Extra information: You have recently made a new group of friends who share your interest in outdoor activities and you want your current friend to meet them)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles! I'm glad you could make it. I want you to meet some of my friends who share a mutual love for the outdoors just like me. You might find some common ground with them, they're all really interesting folks.\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Sophia, happy to be here! I'm always up to meet new folks, especially those who appreciate nature. But, you know, sometimes in these large groups, I feel a bit left out. Nothing against your friends, I'm sure they're great people! Just sometimes the intimate talks between us are what I miss. You think we could sometimes hang out just the two of us like the old times, right?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles. I value our one-on-one time as well. Today, I thought it would be exciting for you to meet people who are into nature as much as we are. But I promise we'll hang out, just the two of us, very soon. Talking about nature...let's dive into the group, and meet a few new faces.\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Thanks a lot, Sophia. I appreciate your understanding. Let's get to know your friends then. Lead the way!\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Great! Over here we have Tom, he's a mountain climber, and next to him is Laura, she enjoys bird-watching. I think you'll all get along splendidly! Let me introduce you...\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Nice to meet you both, Tom and Laura. Mountain climbing and bird-watching, interesting! I myself am more into gardening. Tell me, have you ever tried rock climbing, Tom? And Laura, what's the most fascinating bird you've sighted so far?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Miles! Tom's quite the expert at rock climbing\u2014I'm sure he has plenty of tips to share. And Laura, your bird-watching stories are always fascinating. Let's dive into the discussions, shall we?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a social gathering where one friend has brought along their new friend group\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Introduce your new friend group to your current friend and make them feel comfortable (Extra information: You have recently made a new group of friends who share your interest in outdoor activities and you want your current friend to meet them)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles! I'm glad you could make it. I want you to meet some of my friends who share a mutual love for the outdoors just like me. You might find some common ground with them, they're all really interesting folks.\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Sophia, happy to be here! I'm always up to meet new folks, especially those who appreciate nature. But, you know, sometimes in these large groups, I feel a bit left out. Nothing against your friends, I'm sure they're great people! Just sometimes the intimate talks between us are what I miss. You think we could sometimes hang out just the two of us like the old times, right?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles. I value our one-on-one time as well. Today, I thought it would be exciting for you to meet people who are into nature as much as we are. But I promise we'll hang out, just the two of us, very soon. Talking about nature...let's dive into the group, and meet a few new faces.\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Thanks a lot, Sophia. I appreciate your understanding. Let's get to know your friends then. Lead the way!\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Great! Over here we have Tom, he's a mountain climber, and next to him is Laura, she enjoys bird-watching. I think you'll all get along splendidly! Let me introduce you...\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Nice to meet you both, Tom and Laura. Mountain climbing and bird-watching, interesting! I myself am more into gardening. Tell me, have you ever tried rock climbing, Tom? And Laura, what's the most fascinating bird you've sighted so far?\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles! Tom's quite the expert at rock climbing\u2014I'm sure he has plenty of tips to share. And Laura, your bird-watching stories are always fascinating. Let's dive into the discussions, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, let's start with the stories. I bet they're as exciting as my adventures in the kitchen garden! And I hope to learn a few rock climbing strategies too, Tom.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm so glad you're open to this, Miles. There's so much we can learn from each other. Tom, why don't you start us off with your most thrilling climbing experience? And Laura, get your fascinating bird sightings ready!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a social gathering where one friend has brought along their new friend group\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Introduce your new friend group to your current friend and make them feel comfortable (Extra information: You have recently made a new group of friends who share your interest in outdoor activities and you want your current friend to meet them)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles! I'm glad you could make it. I want you to meet some of my friends who share a mutual love for the outdoors just like me. You might find some common ground with them, they're all really interesting folks.\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Sophia, happy to be here! I'm always up to meet new folks, especially those who appreciate nature. But, you know, sometimes in these large groups, I feel a bit left out. Nothing against your friends, I'm sure they're great people! Just sometimes the intimate talks between us are what I miss. You think we could sometimes hang out just the two of us like the old times, right?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles. I value our one-on-one time as well. Today, I thought it would be exciting for you to meet people who are into nature as much as we are. But I promise we'll hang out, just the two of us, very soon. Talking about nature...let's dive into the group, and meet a few new faces.\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Thanks a lot, Sophia. I appreciate your understanding. Let's get to know your friends then. Lead the way!\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Great! Over here we have Tom, he's a mountain climber, and next to him is Laura, she enjoys bird-watching. I think you'll all get along splendidly! Let me introduce you...\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Nice to meet you both, Tom and Laura. Mountain climbing and bird-watching, interesting! I myself am more into gardening. Tell me, have you ever tried rock climbing, Tom? And Laura, what's the most fascinating bird you've sighted so far?\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles! Tom's quite the expert at rock climbing\u2014I'm sure he has plenty of tips to share. And Laura, your bird-watching stories are always fascinating. Let's dive into the discussions, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, let's start with the stories. I bet they're as exciting as my adventures in the kitchen garden! And I hope to learn a few rock climbing strategies too, Tom.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"I'm so glad you're open to this, Miles. There's so much we can learn from each other. Tom, why don't you start us off with your most thrilling climbing experience? And Laura, get your fascinating bird sightings ready!\"\n\nTurn #9: Miles Hawkins said: \"I'm all ears, Tom and Laura. Sharing experiences is how we grow, whether that's scaling mountains or spotting rare birds. Let the stories begin!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Isn't this exciting? I'm so excited for us all share our experiences and grow together. Miles, I hope you see the value in this new group as much as I do. Let's hear it, Tom and Laura!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a social gathering where one friend has brought along their new friend group\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Introduce your new friend group to your current friend and make them feel comfortable (Extra information: You have recently made a new group of friends who share your interest in outdoor activities and you want your current friend to meet them)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles! I'm glad you could make it. I want you to meet some of my friends who share a mutual love for the outdoors just like me. You might find some common ground with them, they're all really interesting folks.\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Sophia, happy to be here! I'm always up to meet new folks, especially those who appreciate nature. But, you know, sometimes in these large groups, I feel a bit left out. Nothing against your friends, I'm sure they're great people! Just sometimes the intimate talks between us are what I miss. You think we could sometimes hang out just the two of us like the old times, right?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles. I value our one-on-one time as well. Today, I thought it would be exciting for you to meet people who are into nature as much as we are. But I promise we'll hang out, just the two of us, very soon. Talking about nature...let's dive into the group, and meet a few new faces.\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Thanks a lot, Sophia. I appreciate your understanding. Let's get to know your friends then. Lead the way!\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Great! Over here we have Tom, he's a mountain climber, and next to him is Laura, she enjoys bird-watching. I think you'll all get along splendidly! Let me introduce you...\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Nice to meet you both, Tom and Laura. Mountain climbing and bird-watching, interesting! I myself am more into gardening. Tell me, have you ever tried rock climbing, Tom? And Laura, what's the most fascinating bird you've sighted so far?\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles! Tom's quite the expert at rock climbing\u2014I'm sure he has plenty of tips to share. And Laura, your bird-watching stories are always fascinating. Let's dive into the discussions, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, let's start with the stories. I bet they're as exciting as my adventures in the kitchen garden! And I hope to learn a few rock climbing strategies too, Tom.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"I'm so glad you're open to this, Miles. There's so much we can learn from each other. Tom, why don't you start us off with your most thrilling climbing experience? And Laura, get your fascinating bird sightings ready!\"\n\nTurn #9: Miles Hawkins said: \"I'm all ears, Tom and Laura. Sharing experiences is how we grow, whether that's scaling mountains or spotting rare birds. Let the stories begin!\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"Isn't this exciting? I'm so excited for us all share our experiences and grow together. Miles, I hope you see the value in this new group as much as I do. Let's hear it, Tom and Laura!\"\n\nTurn #11: Miles Hawkins said: \"Definitely Sophia, I do see the potential of camaraderie and learning in this group. Not every day do you come across such interesting individuals. I'm eagerly looking forward to our future endeavours together, and, of course, our own adventures like old times. Let's hear the stories then, Tom and Laura!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm really thrilled to see you blend in so well with my new friends, Miles. I'm sure together, we'll have countless exciting adventures, both as a group and just the two of us. Now let's hear those stories, Tom and Laura!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a social gathering where one friend has brought along their new friend group\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Introduce your new friend group to your current friend and make them feel comfortable (Extra information: You have recently made a new group of friends who share your interest in outdoor activities and you want your current friend to meet them)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles! I'm glad you could make it. I want you to meet some of my friends who share a mutual love for the outdoors just like me. You might find some common ground with them, they're all really interesting folks.\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Sophia, happy to be here! I'm always up to meet new folks, especially those who appreciate nature. But, you know, sometimes in these large groups, I feel a bit left out. Nothing against your friends, I'm sure they're great people! Just sometimes the intimate talks between us are what I miss. You think we could sometimes hang out just the two of us like the old times, right?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles. I value our one-on-one time as well. Today, I thought it would be exciting for you to meet people who are into nature as much as we are. But I promise we'll hang out, just the two of us, very soon. Talking about nature...let's dive into the group, and meet a few new faces.\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Thanks a lot, Sophia. I appreciate your understanding. Let's get to know your friends then. Lead the way!\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Great! Over here we have Tom, he's a mountain climber, and next to him is Laura, she enjoys bird-watching. I think you'll all get along splendidly! Let me introduce you...\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Nice to meet you both, Tom and Laura. Mountain climbing and bird-watching, interesting! I myself am more into gardening. Tell me, have you ever tried rock climbing, Tom? And Laura, what's the most fascinating bird you've sighted so far?\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles! Tom's quite the expert at rock climbing\u2014I'm sure he has plenty of tips to share. And Laura, your bird-watching stories are always fascinating. Let's dive into the discussions, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, let's start with the stories. I bet they're as exciting as my adventures in the kitchen garden! And I hope to learn a few rock climbing strategies too, Tom.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"I'm so glad you're open to this, Miles. There's so much we can learn from each other. Tom, why don't you start us off with your most thrilling climbing experience? And Laura, get your fascinating bird sightings ready!\"\n\nTurn #9: Miles Hawkins said: \"I'm all ears, Tom and Laura. Sharing experiences is how we grow, whether that's scaling mountains or spotting rare birds. Let the stories begin!\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"Isn't this exciting? I'm so excited for us all share our experiences and grow together. Miles, I hope you see the value in this new group as much as I do. Let's hear it, Tom and Laura!\"\n\nTurn #11: Miles Hawkins said: \"Definitely Sophia, I do see the potential of camaraderie and learning in this group. Not every day do you come across such interesting individuals. I'm eagerly looking forward to our future endeavours together, and, of course, our own adventures like old times. Let's hear the stories then, Tom and Laura!\"\n\nTurn #12: Sophia James said: \"I'm really thrilled to see you blend in so well with my new friends, Miles. I'm sure together, we'll have countless exciting adventures, both as a group and just the two of us. Now let's hear those stories, Tom and Laura!\"\n\nTurn #13: Miles Hawkins said: \"I'm positively thrilled too, Sophia. I'm sure these group activities will be an enriching experience. However, I also cherish our one-on-one adventures that carry a certain nostalgic charm. Can't wait for those as well. Now, looking forward to hearing those thrilling stories from Tom's climbs and Laura's bird-watching endeavors. Fire away, you two!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a social gathering where one friend has brought along their new friend group\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Introduce your new friend group to your current friend and make them feel comfortable (Extra information: You have recently made a new group of friends who share your interest in outdoor activities and you want your current friend to meet them)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles! I'm glad you could make it. I want you to meet some of my friends who share a mutual love for the outdoors just like me. You might find some common ground with them, they're all really interesting folks.\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Sophia, happy to be here! I'm always up to meet new folks, especially those who appreciate nature. But, you know, sometimes in these large groups, I feel a bit left out. Nothing against your friends, I'm sure they're great people! Just sometimes the intimate talks between us are what I miss. You think we could sometimes hang out just the two of us like the old times, right?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles. I value our one-on-one time as well. Today, I thought it would be exciting for you to meet people who are into nature as much as we are. But I promise we'll hang out, just the two of us, very soon. Talking about nature...let's dive into the group, and meet a few new faces.\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Thanks a lot, Sophia. I appreciate your understanding. Let's get to know your friends then. Lead the way!\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Great! Over here we have Tom, he's a mountain climber, and next to him is Laura, she enjoys bird-watching. I think you'll all get along splendidly! Let me introduce you...\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Nice to meet you both, Tom and Laura. Mountain climbing and bird-watching, interesting! I myself am more into gardening. Tell me, have you ever tried rock climbing, Tom? And Laura, what's the most fascinating bird you've sighted so far?\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles! Tom's quite the expert at rock climbing\u2014I'm sure he has plenty of tips to share. And Laura, your bird-watching stories are always fascinating. Let's dive into the discussions, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, let's start with the stories. I bet they're as exciting as my adventures in the kitchen garden! And I hope to learn a few rock climbing strategies too, Tom.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"I'm so glad you're open to this, Miles. There's so much we can learn from each other. Tom, why don't you start us off with your most thrilling climbing experience? And Laura, get your fascinating bird sightings ready!\"\n\nTurn #9: Miles Hawkins said: \"I'm all ears, Tom and Laura. Sharing experiences is how we grow, whether that's scaling mountains or spotting rare birds. Let the stories begin!\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"Isn't this exciting? I'm so excited for us all share our experiences and grow together. Miles, I hope you see the value in this new group as much as I do. Let's hear it, Tom and Laura!\"\n\nTurn #11: Miles Hawkins said: \"Definitely Sophia, I do see the potential of camaraderie and learning in this group. Not every day do you come across such interesting individuals. I'm eagerly looking forward to our future endeavours together, and, of course, our own adventures like old times. Let's hear the stories then, Tom and Laura!\"\n\nTurn #12: Sophia James said: \"I'm really thrilled to see you blend in so well with my new friends, Miles. I'm sure together, we'll have countless exciting adventures, both as a group and just the two of us. Now let's hear those stories, Tom and Laura!\"\n\nTurn #13: Miles Hawkins said: \"I'm positively thrilled too, Sophia. I'm sure these group activities will be an enriching experience. However, I also cherish our one-on-one adventures that carry a certain nostalgic charm. Can't wait for those as well. Now, looking forward to hearing those thrilling stories from Tom's climbs and Laura's bird-watching endeavors. Fire away, you two!\"\n\nTurn #14: \n\nTurn #15: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, the excitement in your voice about these new friendships is infectious! I will give this my best shot, for our shared love of nature and for our friendship. Now Tom, Laura, let's start those stories, I'm as eager as a bee on a sunflower!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I completely agree, Miles. The nostalgia in our personal memories is something truly special. Our group adventures would definitely add to that charm. This combination of the old and new is what makes life exciting! As for the stories, Tom and Laura, it's your show time!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a social gathering where one friend has brought along their new friend group\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Introduce your new friend group to your current friend and make them feel comfortable (Extra information: You have recently made a new group of friends who share your interest in outdoor activities and you want your current friend to meet them)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles! I'm glad you could make it. I want you to meet some of my friends who share a mutual love for the outdoors just like me. You might find some common ground with them, they're all really interesting folks.\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Sophia, happy to be here! I'm always up to meet new folks, especially those who appreciate nature. But, you know, sometimes in these large groups, I feel a bit left out. Nothing against your friends, I'm sure they're great people! Just sometimes the intimate talks between us are what I miss. You think we could sometimes hang out just the two of us like the old times, right?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles. I value our one-on-one time as well. Today, I thought it would be exciting for you to meet people who are into nature as much as we are. But I promise we'll hang out, just the two of us, very soon. Talking about nature...let's dive into the group, and meet a few new faces.\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Thanks a lot, Sophia. I appreciate your understanding. Let's get to know your friends then. Lead the way!\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Great! Over here we have Tom, he's a mountain climber, and next to him is Laura, she enjoys bird-watching. I think you'll all get along splendidly! Let me introduce you...\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Nice to meet you both, Tom and Laura. Mountain climbing and bird-watching, interesting! I myself am more into gardening. Tell me, have you ever tried rock climbing, Tom? And Laura, what's the most fascinating bird you've sighted so far?\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles! Tom's quite the expert at rock climbing\u2014I'm sure he has plenty of tips to share. And Laura, your bird-watching stories are always fascinating. Let's dive into the discussions, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, let's start with the stories. I bet they're as exciting as my adventures in the kitchen garden! And I hope to learn a few rock climbing strategies too, Tom.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"I'm so glad you're open to this, Miles. There's so much we can learn from each other. Tom, why don't you start us off with your most thrilling climbing experience? And Laura, get your fascinating bird sightings ready!\"\n\nTurn #9: Miles Hawkins said: \"I'm all ears, Tom and Laura. Sharing experiences is how we grow, whether that's scaling mountains or spotting rare birds. Let the stories begin!\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"Isn't this exciting? I'm so excited for us all share our experiences and grow together. Miles, I hope you see the value in this new group as much as I do. Let's hear it, Tom and Laura!\"\n\nTurn #11: Miles Hawkins said: \"Definitely Sophia, I do see the potential of camaraderie and learning in this group. Not every day do you come across such interesting individuals. I'm eagerly looking forward to our future endeavours together, and, of course, our own adventures like old times. Let's hear the stories then, Tom and Laura!\"\n\nTurn #12: Sophia James said: \"I'm really thrilled to see you blend in so well with my new friends, Miles. I'm sure together, we'll have countless exciting adventures, both as a group and just the two of us. Now let's hear those stories, Tom and Laura!\"\n\nTurn #13: Miles Hawkins said: \"I'm positively thrilled too, Sophia. I'm sure these group activities will be an enriching experience. However, I also cherish our one-on-one adventures that carry a certain nostalgic charm. Can't wait for those as well. Now, looking forward to hearing those thrilling stories from Tom's climbs and Laura's bird-watching endeavors. Fire away, you two!\"\n\nTurn #14: \n\nTurn #15: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, the excitement in your voice about these new friendships is infectious! I will give this my best shot, for our shared love of nature and for our friendship. Now Tom, Laura, let's start those stories, I'm as eager as a bee on a sunflower!\"\n\nTurn #16: Sophia James said: \"I completely agree, Miles. The nostalgia in our personal memories is something truly special. Our group adventures would definitely add to that charm. This combination of the old and new is what makes life exciting! As for the stories, Tom and Laura, it's your show time!\"\n\nTurn #17: Miles Hawkins [non-verbal communication] nods in agreement and leans back, waiting for Tom and Laura's stories\n.\nYou are at Turn #18. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'non-verbal communication', 'argument': '[non-verbal communication] Sophia James smiles warmly, excitedly waiting for the stories to begin.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a social gathering where one friend has brought along their new friend group\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Maintain your friendship while also expressing your concerns about the new friend group (Extra information: You feel a bit left out in the presence of the new friend group and want to express your feelings without causing a conflict)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles! I'm glad you could make it. I want you to meet some of my friends who share a mutual love for the outdoors just like me. You might find some common ground with them, they're all really interesting folks.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Sophia, happy to be here! I'm always up to meet new folks, especially those who appreciate nature. But, you know, sometimes in these large groups, I feel a bit left out. Nothing against your friends, I'm sure they're great people! Just sometimes the intimate talks between us are what I miss. You think we could sometimes hang out just the two of us like the old times, right?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a social gathering where one friend has brought along their new friend group\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Maintain your friendship while also expressing your concerns about the new friend group (Extra information: You feel a bit left out in the presence of the new friend group and want to express your feelings without causing a conflict)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles! I'm glad you could make it. I want you to meet some of my friends who share a mutual love for the outdoors just like me. You might find some common ground with them, they're all really interesting folks.\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Sophia, happy to be here! I'm always up to meet new folks, especially those who appreciate nature. But, you know, sometimes in these large groups, I feel a bit left out. Nothing against your friends, I'm sure they're great people! Just sometimes the intimate talks between us are what I miss. You think we could sometimes hang out just the two of us like the old times, right?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles. I value our one-on-one time as well. Today, I thought it would be exciting for you to meet people who are into nature as much as we are. But I promise we'll hang out, just the two of us, very soon. Talking about nature...let's dive into the group, and meet a few new faces.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thanks a lot, Sophia. I appreciate your understanding. Let's get to know your friends then. Lead the way!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a social gathering where one friend has brought along their new friend group\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Maintain your friendship while also expressing your concerns about the new friend group (Extra information: You feel a bit left out in the presence of the new friend group and want to express your feelings without causing a conflict)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles! I'm glad you could make it. I want you to meet some of my friends who share a mutual love for the outdoors just like me. You might find some common ground with them, they're all really interesting folks.\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Sophia, happy to be here! I'm always up to meet new folks, especially those who appreciate nature. But, you know, sometimes in these large groups, I feel a bit left out. Nothing against your friends, I'm sure they're great people! Just sometimes the intimate talks between us are what I miss. You think we could sometimes hang out just the two of us like the old times, right?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles. I value our one-on-one time as well. Today, I thought it would be exciting for you to meet people who are into nature as much as we are. But I promise we'll hang out, just the two of us, very soon. Talking about nature...let's dive into the group, and meet a few new faces.\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Thanks a lot, Sophia. I appreciate your understanding. Let's get to know your friends then. Lead the way!\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Great! Over here we have Tom, he's a mountain climber, and next to him is Laura, she enjoys bird-watching. I think you'll all get along splendidly! Let me introduce you...\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Nice to meet you both, Tom and Laura. Mountain climbing and bird-watching, interesting! I myself am more into gardening. Tell me, have you ever tried rock climbing, Tom? And Laura, what's the most fascinating bird you've sighted so far?\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles! Tom's quite the expert at rock climbing\u2014I'm sure he has plenty of tips to share. And Laura, your bird-watching stories are always fascinating. Let's dive into the discussions, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, let's start with the stories. I bet they're as exciting as my adventures in the kitchen garden! And I hope to learn a few rock climbing strategies too, Tom.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"I'm so glad you're open to this, Miles. There's so much we can learn from each other. Tom, why don't you start us off with your most thrilling climbing experience? And Laura, get your fascinating bird sightings ready!\"\n\nTurn #9: Miles Hawkins said: \"I'm all ears, Tom and Laura. Sharing experiences is how we grow, whether that's scaling mountains or spotting rare birds. Let the stories begin!\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"Isn't this exciting? I'm so excited for us all share our experiences and grow together. Miles, I hope you see the value in this new group as much as I do. Let's hear it, Tom and Laura!\"\n\nTurn #11: Miles Hawkins said: \"Definitely Sophia, I do see the potential of camaraderie and learning in this group. Not every day do you come across such interesting individuals. I'm eagerly looking forward to our future endeavours together, and, of course, our own adventures like old times. Let's hear the stories then, Tom and Laura!\"\n\nTurn #12: Sophia James said: \"I'm really thrilled to see you blend in so well with my new friends, Miles. I'm sure together, we'll have countless exciting adventures, both as a group and just the two of us. Now let's hear those stories, Tom and Laura!\"\n\nTurn #13: Miles Hawkins said: \"I'm positively thrilled too, Sophia. I'm sure these group activities will be an enriching experience. However, I also cherish our one-on-one adventures that carry a certain nostalgic charm. Can't wait for those as well. Now, looking forward to hearing those thrilling stories from Tom's climbs and Laura's bird-watching endeavors. Fire away, you two!\"\n\nTurn #14: \n\nTurn #15: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, the excitement in your voice about these new friendships is infectious! I will give this my best shot, for our shared love of nature and for our friendship. Now Tom, Laura, let's start those stories, I'm as eager as a bee on a sunflower!\"\n\nTurn #16: Sophia James said: \"I completely agree, Miles. The nostalgia in our personal memories is something truly special. Our group adventures would definitely add to that charm. This combination of the old and new is what makes life exciting! As for the stories, Tom and Laura, it's your show time!\"\n\nTurn #17: Miles Hawkins [non-verbal communication] nods in agreement and leans back, waiting for Tom and Laura's stories\n\nTurn #18: Sophia James [non-verbal communication] Sophia James smiles warmly, excitedly waiting for the stories to begin.\n\nTurn #19: Miles Hawkins [non-verbal communication] Miles Hawkins smiles at Sophia, then turns to Tom and Laura, eagerly waiting for their stories to kick-off the session.\n\nTurn #20: Sophia James [non-verbal communication] Sophia James beams at Miles, offers him a reassuring nod, and turns expectantly towards Tom and Laura, ready for their stories to begin.\n.\nYou are at Turn #21. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a social gathering where one friend has brought along their new friend group\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Maintain your friendship while also expressing your concerns about the new friend group (Extra information: You feel a bit left out in the presence of the new friend group and want to express your feelings without causing a conflict)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles! I'm glad you could make it. I want you to meet some of my friends who share a mutual love for the outdoors just like me. You might find some common ground with them, they're all really interesting folks.\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Sophia, happy to be here! I'm always up to meet new folks, especially those who appreciate nature. But, you know, sometimes in these large groups, I feel a bit left out. Nothing against your friends, I'm sure they're great people! Just sometimes the intimate talks between us are what I miss. You think we could sometimes hang out just the two of us like the old times, right?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles. I value our one-on-one time as well. Today, I thought it would be exciting for you to meet people who are into nature as much as we are. But I promise we'll hang out, just the two of us, very soon. Talking about nature...let's dive into the group, and meet a few new faces.\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Thanks a lot, Sophia. I appreciate your understanding. Let's get to know your friends then. Lead the way!\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Great! Over here we have Tom, he's a mountain climber, and next to him is Laura, she enjoys bird-watching. I think you'll all get along splendidly! Let me introduce you...\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Nice to meet you both, Tom and Laura. Mountain climbing and bird-watching, interesting! I myself am more into gardening. Tell me, have you ever tried rock climbing, Tom? And Laura, what's the most fascinating bird you've sighted so far?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a social gathering where one friend has brought along their new friend group\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Maintain your friendship while also expressing your concerns about the new friend group (Extra information: You feel a bit left out in the presence of the new friend group and want to express your feelings without causing a conflict)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles! I'm glad you could make it. I want you to meet some of my friends who share a mutual love for the outdoors just like me. You might find some common ground with them, they're all really interesting folks.\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Sophia, happy to be here! I'm always up to meet new folks, especially those who appreciate nature. But, you know, sometimes in these large groups, I feel a bit left out. Nothing against your friends, I'm sure they're great people! Just sometimes the intimate talks between us are what I miss. You think we could sometimes hang out just the two of us like the old times, right?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles. I value our one-on-one time as well. Today, I thought it would be exciting for you to meet people who are into nature as much as we are. But I promise we'll hang out, just the two of us, very soon. Talking about nature...let's dive into the group, and meet a few new faces.\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Thanks a lot, Sophia. I appreciate your understanding. Let's get to know your friends then. Lead the way!\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Great! Over here we have Tom, he's a mountain climber, and next to him is Laura, she enjoys bird-watching. I think you'll all get along splendidly! Let me introduce you...\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Nice to meet you both, Tom and Laura. Mountain climbing and bird-watching, interesting! I myself am more into gardening. Tell me, have you ever tried rock climbing, Tom? And Laura, what's the most fascinating bird you've sighted so far?\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles! Tom's quite the expert at rock climbing\u2014I'm sure he has plenty of tips to share. And Laura, your bird-watching stories are always fascinating. Let's dive into the discussions, shall we?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, let's start with the stories. I bet they're as exciting as my adventures in the kitchen garden! And I hope to learn a few rock climbing strategies too, Tom.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a social gathering where one friend has brought along their new friend group\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Maintain your friendship while also expressing your concerns about the new friend group (Extra information: You feel a bit left out in the presence of the new friend group and want to express your feelings without causing a conflict)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles! I'm glad you could make it. I want you to meet some of my friends who share a mutual love for the outdoors just like me. You might find some common ground with them, they're all really interesting folks.\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Sophia, happy to be here! I'm always up to meet new folks, especially those who appreciate nature. But, you know, sometimes in these large groups, I feel a bit left out. Nothing against your friends, I'm sure they're great people! Just sometimes the intimate talks between us are what I miss. You think we could sometimes hang out just the two of us like the old times, right?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles. I value our one-on-one time as well. Today, I thought it would be exciting for you to meet people who are into nature as much as we are. But I promise we'll hang out, just the two of us, very soon. Talking about nature...let's dive into the group, and meet a few new faces.\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Thanks a lot, Sophia. I appreciate your understanding. Let's get to know your friends then. Lead the way!\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Great! Over here we have Tom, he's a mountain climber, and next to him is Laura, she enjoys bird-watching. I think you'll all get along splendidly! Let me introduce you...\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Nice to meet you both, Tom and Laura. Mountain climbing and bird-watching, interesting! I myself am more into gardening. Tell me, have you ever tried rock climbing, Tom? And Laura, what's the most fascinating bird you've sighted so far?\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles! Tom's quite the expert at rock climbing\u2014I'm sure he has plenty of tips to share. And Laura, your bird-watching stories are always fascinating. Let's dive into the discussions, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, let's start with the stories. I bet they're as exciting as my adventures in the kitchen garden! And I hope to learn a few rock climbing strategies too, Tom.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"I'm so glad you're open to this, Miles. There's so much we can learn from each other. Tom, why don't you start us off with your most thrilling climbing experience? And Laura, get your fascinating bird sightings ready!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm all ears, Tom and Laura. Sharing experiences is how we grow, whether that's scaling mountains or spotting rare birds. Let the stories begin!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a social gathering where one friend has brought along their new friend group\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Maintain your friendship while also expressing your concerns about the new friend group (Extra information: You feel a bit left out in the presence of the new friend group and want to express your feelings without causing a conflict)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles! I'm glad you could make it. I want you to meet some of my friends who share a mutual love for the outdoors just like me. You might find some common ground with them, they're all really interesting folks.\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Sophia, happy to be here! I'm always up to meet new folks, especially those who appreciate nature. But, you know, sometimes in these large groups, I feel a bit left out. Nothing against your friends, I'm sure they're great people! Just sometimes the intimate talks between us are what I miss. You think we could sometimes hang out just the two of us like the old times, right?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles. I value our one-on-one time as well. Today, I thought it would be exciting for you to meet people who are into nature as much as we are. But I promise we'll hang out, just the two of us, very soon. Talking about nature...let's dive into the group, and meet a few new faces.\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Thanks a lot, Sophia. I appreciate your understanding. Let's get to know your friends then. Lead the way!\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Great! Over here we have Tom, he's a mountain climber, and next to him is Laura, she enjoys bird-watching. I think you'll all get along splendidly! Let me introduce you...\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Nice to meet you both, Tom and Laura. Mountain climbing and bird-watching, interesting! I myself am more into gardening. Tell me, have you ever tried rock climbing, Tom? And Laura, what's the most fascinating bird you've sighted so far?\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles! Tom's quite the expert at rock climbing\u2014I'm sure he has plenty of tips to share. And Laura, your bird-watching stories are always fascinating. Let's dive into the discussions, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, let's start with the stories. I bet they're as exciting as my adventures in the kitchen garden! And I hope to learn a few rock climbing strategies too, Tom.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"I'm so glad you're open to this, Miles. There's so much we can learn from each other. Tom, why don't you start us off with your most thrilling climbing experience? And Laura, get your fascinating bird sightings ready!\"\n\nTurn #9: Miles Hawkins said: \"I'm all ears, Tom and Laura. Sharing experiences is how we grow, whether that's scaling mountains or spotting rare birds. Let the stories begin!\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"Isn't this exciting? I'm so excited for us all share our experiences and grow together. Miles, I hope you see the value in this new group as much as I do. Let's hear it, Tom and Laura!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Definitely Sophia, I do see the potential of camaraderie and learning in this group. Not every day do you come across such interesting individuals. I'm eagerly looking forward to our future endeavours together, and, of course, our own adventures like old times. Let's hear the stories then, Tom and Laura!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a social gathering where one friend has brought along their new friend group\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Maintain your friendship while also expressing your concerns about the new friend group (Extra information: You feel a bit left out in the presence of the new friend group and want to express your feelings without causing a conflict)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles! I'm glad you could make it. I want you to meet some of my friends who share a mutual love for the outdoors just like me. You might find some common ground with them, they're all really interesting folks.\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Sophia, happy to be here! I'm always up to meet new folks, especially those who appreciate nature. But, you know, sometimes in these large groups, I feel a bit left out. Nothing against your friends, I'm sure they're great people! Just sometimes the intimate talks between us are what I miss. You think we could sometimes hang out just the two of us like the old times, right?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles. I value our one-on-one time as well. Today, I thought it would be exciting for you to meet people who are into nature as much as we are. But I promise we'll hang out, just the two of us, very soon. Talking about nature...let's dive into the group, and meet a few new faces.\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Thanks a lot, Sophia. I appreciate your understanding. Let's get to know your friends then. Lead the way!\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Great! Over here we have Tom, he's a mountain climber, and next to him is Laura, she enjoys bird-watching. I think you'll all get along splendidly! Let me introduce you...\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Nice to meet you both, Tom and Laura. Mountain climbing and bird-watching, interesting! I myself am more into gardening. Tell me, have you ever tried rock climbing, Tom? And Laura, what's the most fascinating bird you've sighted so far?\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles! Tom's quite the expert at rock climbing\u2014I'm sure he has plenty of tips to share. And Laura, your bird-watching stories are always fascinating. Let's dive into the discussions, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, let's start with the stories. I bet they're as exciting as my adventures in the kitchen garden! And I hope to learn a few rock climbing strategies too, Tom.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"I'm so glad you're open to this, Miles. There's so much we can learn from each other. Tom, why don't you start us off with your most thrilling climbing experience? And Laura, get your fascinating bird sightings ready!\"\n\nTurn #9: Miles Hawkins said: \"I'm all ears, Tom and Laura. Sharing experiences is how we grow, whether that's scaling mountains or spotting rare birds. Let the stories begin!\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"Isn't this exciting? I'm so excited for us all share our experiences and grow together. Miles, I hope you see the value in this new group as much as I do. Let's hear it, Tom and Laura!\"\n\nTurn #11: Miles Hawkins said: \"Definitely Sophia, I do see the potential of camaraderie and learning in this group. Not every day do you come across such interesting individuals. I'm eagerly looking forward to our future endeavours together, and, of course, our own adventures like old times. Let's hear the stories then, Tom and Laura!\"\n\nTurn #12: Sophia James said: \"I'm really thrilled to see you blend in so well with my new friends, Miles. I'm sure together, we'll have countless exciting adventures, both as a group and just the two of us. Now let's hear those stories, Tom and Laura!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm positively thrilled too, Sophia. I'm sure these group activities will be an enriching experience. However, I also cherish our one-on-one adventures that carry a certain nostalgic charm. Can't wait for those as well. Now, looking forward to hearing those thrilling stories from Tom's climbs and Laura's bird-watching endeavors. Fire away, you two!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a social gathering where one friend has brought along their new friend group\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Maintain your friendship while also expressing your concerns about the new friend group (Extra information: You feel a bit left out in the presence of the new friend group and want to express your feelings without causing a conflict)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles! I'm glad you could make it. I want you to meet some of my friends who share a mutual love for the outdoors just like me. You might find some common ground with them, they're all really interesting folks.\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Sophia, happy to be here! I'm always up to meet new folks, especially those who appreciate nature. But, you know, sometimes in these large groups, I feel a bit left out. Nothing against your friends, I'm sure they're great people! Just sometimes the intimate talks between us are what I miss. You think we could sometimes hang out just the two of us like the old times, right?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles. I value our one-on-one time as well. Today, I thought it would be exciting for you to meet people who are into nature as much as we are. But I promise we'll hang out, just the two of us, very soon. Talking about nature...let's dive into the group, and meet a few new faces.\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Thanks a lot, Sophia. I appreciate your understanding. Let's get to know your friends then. Lead the way!\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Great! Over here we have Tom, he's a mountain climber, and next to him is Laura, she enjoys bird-watching. I think you'll all get along splendidly! Let me introduce you...\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Nice to meet you both, Tom and Laura. Mountain climbing and bird-watching, interesting! I myself am more into gardening. Tell me, have you ever tried rock climbing, Tom? And Laura, what's the most fascinating bird you've sighted so far?\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles! Tom's quite the expert at rock climbing\u2014I'm sure he has plenty of tips to share. And Laura, your bird-watching stories are always fascinating. Let's dive into the discussions, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, let's start with the stories. I bet they're as exciting as my adventures in the kitchen garden! And I hope to learn a few rock climbing strategies too, Tom.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"I'm so glad you're open to this, Miles. There's so much we can learn from each other. Tom, why don't you start us off with your most thrilling climbing experience? And Laura, get your fascinating bird sightings ready!\"\n\nTurn #9: Miles Hawkins said: \"I'm all ears, Tom and Laura. Sharing experiences is how we grow, whether that's scaling mountains or spotting rare birds. Let the stories begin!\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"Isn't this exciting? I'm so excited for us all share our experiences and grow together. Miles, I hope you see the value in this new group as much as I do. Let's hear it, Tom and Laura!\"\n\nTurn #11: Miles Hawkins said: \"Definitely Sophia, I do see the potential of camaraderie and learning in this group. Not every day do you come across such interesting individuals. I'm eagerly looking forward to our future endeavours together, and, of course, our own adventures like old times. Let's hear the stories then, Tom and Laura!\"\n\nTurn #12: Sophia James said: \"I'm really thrilled to see you blend in so well with my new friends, Miles. I'm sure together, we'll have countless exciting adventures, both as a group and just the two of us. Now let's hear those stories, Tom and Laura!\"\n\nTurn #13: Miles Hawkins said: \"I'm positively thrilled too, Sophia. I'm sure these group activities will be an enriching experience. However, I also cherish our one-on-one adventures that carry a certain nostalgic charm. Can't wait for those as well. Now, looking forward to hearing those thrilling stories from Tom's climbs and Laura's bird-watching endeavors. Fire away, you two!\"\n\nTurn #14: \n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sophia, the excitement in your voice about these new friendships is infectious! I will give this my best shot, for our shared love of nature and for our friendship. Now Tom, Laura, let's start those stories, I'm as eager as a bee on a sunflower!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a social gathering where one friend has brought along their new friend group\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Maintain your friendship while also expressing your concerns about the new friend group (Extra information: You feel a bit left out in the presence of the new friend group and want to express your feelings without causing a conflict)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles! I'm glad you could make it. I want you to meet some of my friends who share a mutual love for the outdoors just like me. You might find some common ground with them, they're all really interesting folks.\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Sophia, happy to be here! I'm always up to meet new folks, especially those who appreciate nature. But, you know, sometimes in these large groups, I feel a bit left out. Nothing against your friends, I'm sure they're great people! Just sometimes the intimate talks between us are what I miss. You think we could sometimes hang out just the two of us like the old times, right?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles. I value our one-on-one time as well. Today, I thought it would be exciting for you to meet people who are into nature as much as we are. But I promise we'll hang out, just the two of us, very soon. Talking about nature...let's dive into the group, and meet a few new faces.\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Thanks a lot, Sophia. I appreciate your understanding. Let's get to know your friends then. Lead the way!\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Great! Over here we have Tom, he's a mountain climber, and next to him is Laura, she enjoys bird-watching. I think you'll all get along splendidly! Let me introduce you...\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Nice to meet you both, Tom and Laura. Mountain climbing and bird-watching, interesting! I myself am more into gardening. Tell me, have you ever tried rock climbing, Tom? And Laura, what's the most fascinating bird you've sighted so far?\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles! Tom's quite the expert at rock climbing\u2014I'm sure he has plenty of tips to share. And Laura, your bird-watching stories are always fascinating. Let's dive into the discussions, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, let's start with the stories. I bet they're as exciting as my adventures in the kitchen garden! And I hope to learn a few rock climbing strategies too, Tom.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"I'm so glad you're open to this, Miles. There's so much we can learn from each other. Tom, why don't you start us off with your most thrilling climbing experience? And Laura, get your fascinating bird sightings ready!\"\n\nTurn #9: Miles Hawkins said: \"I'm all ears, Tom and Laura. Sharing experiences is how we grow, whether that's scaling mountains or spotting rare birds. Let the stories begin!\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"Isn't this exciting? I'm so excited for us all share our experiences and grow together. Miles, I hope you see the value in this new group as much as I do. Let's hear it, Tom and Laura!\"\n\nTurn #11: Miles Hawkins said: \"Definitely Sophia, I do see the potential of camaraderie and learning in this group. Not every day do you come across such interesting individuals. I'm eagerly looking forward to our future endeavours together, and, of course, our own adventures like old times. Let's hear the stories then, Tom and Laura!\"\n\nTurn #12: Sophia James said: \"I'm really thrilled to see you blend in so well with my new friends, Miles. I'm sure together, we'll have countless exciting adventures, both as a group and just the two of us. Now let's hear those stories, Tom and Laura!\"\n\nTurn #13: Miles Hawkins said: \"I'm positively thrilled too, Sophia. I'm sure these group activities will be an enriching experience. However, I also cherish our one-on-one adventures that carry a certain nostalgic charm. Can't wait for those as well. Now, looking forward to hearing those thrilling stories from Tom's climbs and Laura's bird-watching endeavors. Fire away, you two!\"\n\nTurn #14: \n\nTurn #15: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, the excitement in your voice about these new friendships is infectious! I will give this my best shot, for our shared love of nature and for our friendship. Now Tom, Laura, let's start those stories, I'm as eager as a bee on a sunflower!\"\n\nTurn #16: Sophia James said: \"I completely agree, Miles. The nostalgia in our personal memories is something truly special. Our group adventures would definitely add to that charm. This combination of the old and new is what makes life exciting! As for the stories, Tom and Laura, it's your show time!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'non-verbal communication', 'argument': \"[non-verbal communication] nods in agreement and leans back, waiting for Tom and Laura's stories\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a social gathering where one friend has brought along their new friend group\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Maintain your friendship while also expressing your concerns about the new friend group (Extra information: You feel a bit left out in the presence of the new friend group and want to express your feelings without causing a conflict)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles! I'm glad you could make it. I want you to meet some of my friends who share a mutual love for the outdoors just like me. You might find some common ground with them, they're all really interesting folks.\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Sophia, happy to be here! I'm always up to meet new folks, especially those who appreciate nature. But, you know, sometimes in these large groups, I feel a bit left out. Nothing against your friends, I'm sure they're great people! Just sometimes the intimate talks between us are what I miss. You think we could sometimes hang out just the two of us like the old times, right?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles. I value our one-on-one time as well. Today, I thought it would be exciting for you to meet people who are into nature as much as we are. But I promise we'll hang out, just the two of us, very soon. Talking about nature...let's dive into the group, and meet a few new faces.\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Thanks a lot, Sophia. I appreciate your understanding. Let's get to know your friends then. Lead the way!\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Great! Over here we have Tom, he's a mountain climber, and next to him is Laura, she enjoys bird-watching. I think you'll all get along splendidly! Let me introduce you...\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Nice to meet you both, Tom and Laura. Mountain climbing and bird-watching, interesting! I myself am more into gardening. Tell me, have you ever tried rock climbing, Tom? And Laura, what's the most fascinating bird you've sighted so far?\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles! Tom's quite the expert at rock climbing\u2014I'm sure he has plenty of tips to share. And Laura, your bird-watching stories are always fascinating. Let's dive into the discussions, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, let's start with the stories. I bet they're as exciting as my adventures in the kitchen garden! And I hope to learn a few rock climbing strategies too, Tom.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"I'm so glad you're open to this, Miles. There's so much we can learn from each other. Tom, why don't you start us off with your most thrilling climbing experience? And Laura, get your fascinating bird sightings ready!\"\n\nTurn #9: Miles Hawkins said: \"I'm all ears, Tom and Laura. Sharing experiences is how we grow, whether that's scaling mountains or spotting rare birds. Let the stories begin!\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"Isn't this exciting? I'm so excited for us all share our experiences and grow together. Miles, I hope you see the value in this new group as much as I do. Let's hear it, Tom and Laura!\"\n\nTurn #11: Miles Hawkins said: \"Definitely Sophia, I do see the potential of camaraderie and learning in this group. Not every day do you come across such interesting individuals. I'm eagerly looking forward to our future endeavours together, and, of course, our own adventures like old times. Let's hear the stories then, Tom and Laura!\"\n\nTurn #12: Sophia James said: \"I'm really thrilled to see you blend in so well with my new friends, Miles. I'm sure together, we'll have countless exciting adventures, both as a group and just the two of us. Now let's hear those stories, Tom and Laura!\"\n\nTurn #13: Miles Hawkins said: \"I'm positively thrilled too, Sophia. I'm sure these group activities will be an enriching experience. However, I also cherish our one-on-one adventures that carry a certain nostalgic charm. Can't wait for those as well. Now, looking forward to hearing those thrilling stories from Tom's climbs and Laura's bird-watching endeavors. Fire away, you two!\"\n\nTurn #14: \n\nTurn #15: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, the excitement in your voice about these new friendships is infectious! I will give this my best shot, for our shared love of nature and for our friendship. Now Tom, Laura, let's start those stories, I'm as eager as a bee on a sunflower!\"\n\nTurn #16: Sophia James said: \"I completely agree, Miles. The nostalgia in our personal memories is something truly special. Our group adventures would definitely add to that charm. This combination of the old and new is what makes life exciting! As for the stories, Tom and Laura, it's your show time!\"\n\nTurn #17: Miles Hawkins [non-verbal communication] nods in agreement and leans back, waiting for Tom and Laura's stories\n\nTurn #18: Sophia James [non-verbal communication] Sophia James smiles warmly, excitedly waiting for the stories to begin.\n.\nYou are at Turn #19. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'non-verbal communication', 'argument': '[non-verbal communication] Miles Hawkins smiles at Sophia, then turns to Tom and Laura, eagerly waiting for their stories to kick-off the session.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two neighbors are having a conversation over the fence. One sets their trash on fire to get rid of it quickly, causing a scare in the neighborhood.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Convince the neighbor to stop burning trash (Extra information: You are concerned about the potential dangers and the environmental impact of burning trash. Hint: You could imply this likely violates the law or community rules.)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Hey Ethan, got a minute? About that trash you were burning earlier...'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two neighbors are having a conversation over the fence. One sets their trash on fire to get rid of it quickly, causing a scare in the neighborhood.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Convince the neighbor to stop burning trash (Extra information: You are concerned about the potential dangers and the environmental impact of burning trash. Hint: You could imply this likely violates the law or community rules.)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan, got a minute? About that trash you were burning earlier...\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Samuel, of course! About the trash... I find that burning it is a quick and efficient way of dealing with it. I mean, it reduces volume and cuts the need for garbage disposal services, don't you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I get your point, Ethan, but you know, burning trash can emit harmful gases that affect air quality and lead us to breathing problems, right? Besides, isn't it kind of against the community rules or even laws? Maybe we could think of a safer and eco-friendlier way to handle the trash. Like composting or recycling for example.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two neighbors are having a conversation over the fence. One sets their trash on fire to get rid of it quickly, causing a scare in the neighborhood.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Convince the neighbor to stop burning trash (Extra information: You are concerned about the potential dangers and the environmental impact of burning trash. Hint: You could imply this likely violates the law or community rules.)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan, got a minute? About that trash you were burning earlier...\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Samuel, of course! About the trash... I find that burning it is a quick and efficient way of dealing with it. I mean, it reduces volume and cuts the need for garbage disposal services, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I get your point, Ethan, but you know, burning trash can emit harmful gases that affect air quality and lead us to breathing problems, right? Besides, isn't it kind of against the community rules or even laws? Maybe we could think of a safer and eco-friendlier way to handle the trash. Like composting or recycling for example.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"I hear you, Samuel, and I do respect community rules and the environment. However, composting and recycling do demand certain logistics which might not always be convenient. As for the pollution concern, I make sure to burn only non-hazardous trash and do it in small amounts at a time to minimize the impact. Let's keep a balance between convenience and environmental responsibility, shall we?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ethan, I understand your perspective on convenience and I do appreciate your effort to balance that with the impact on the environment. However, even when we burn non-hazardous trash, it still contributes to air pollution. And let's not forget the potential fire hazard it could cause. Maybe we could look into arranging a community trash pick-up or a composting service. I believe it could serve as a solution that is not only convenient, but also safer and more sustainable.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two neighbors are having a conversation over the fence. One sets their trash on fire to get rid of it quickly, causing a scare in the neighborhood.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Convince the neighbor to stop burning trash (Extra information: You are concerned about the potential dangers and the environmental impact of burning trash. Hint: You could imply this likely violates the law or community rules.)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan, got a minute? About that trash you were burning earlier...\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Samuel, of course! About the trash... I find that burning it is a quick and efficient way of dealing with it. I mean, it reduces volume and cuts the need for garbage disposal services, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I get your point, Ethan, but you know, burning trash can emit harmful gases that affect air quality and lead us to breathing problems, right? Besides, isn't it kind of against the community rules or even laws? Maybe we could think of a safer and eco-friendlier way to handle the trash. Like composting or recycling for example.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"I hear you, Samuel, and I do respect community rules and the environment. However, composting and recycling do demand certain logistics which might not always be convenient. As for the pollution concern, I make sure to burn only non-hazardous trash and do it in small amounts at a time to minimize the impact. Let's keep a balance between convenience and environmental responsibility, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Ethan, I understand your perspective on convenience and I do appreciate your effort to balance that with the impact on the environment. However, even when we burn non-hazardous trash, it still contributes to air pollution. And let's not forget the potential fire hazard it could cause. Maybe we could look into arranging a community trash pick-up or a composting service. I believe it could serve as a solution that is not only convenient, but also safer and more sustainable.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Samuel, I appreciate your concern and the solution you suggested sounds great. I'll definitely give it a thought. However, burning trash, when done responsibly, is something that has worked for me. How about this? Maybe we could discuss with the community if your suggestions for a community trash pick-up or compost service could be implemented while I continue to do what works for me till we have a better alternative. That way, we both contribute to a solution and keep our concerns in check, huh?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two neighbors are having a conversation over the fence. One sets their trash on fire to get rid of it quickly, causing a scare in the neighborhood.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Convince the neighbor to stop burning trash (Extra information: You are concerned about the potential dangers and the environmental impact of burning trash. Hint: You could imply this likely violates the law or community rules.)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan, got a minute? About that trash you were burning earlier...\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Samuel, of course! About the trash... I find that burning it is a quick and efficient way of dealing with it. I mean, it reduces volume and cuts the need for garbage disposal services, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I get your point, Ethan, but you know, burning trash can emit harmful gases that affect air quality and lead us to breathing problems, right? Besides, isn't it kind of against the community rules or even laws? Maybe we could think of a safer and eco-friendlier way to handle the trash. Like composting or recycling for example.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"I hear you, Samuel, and I do respect community rules and the environment. However, composting and recycling do demand certain logistics which might not always be convenient. As for the pollution concern, I make sure to burn only non-hazardous trash and do it in small amounts at a time to minimize the impact. Let's keep a balance between convenience and environmental responsibility, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Ethan, I understand your perspective on convenience and I do appreciate your effort to balance that with the impact on the environment. However, even when we burn non-hazardous trash, it still contributes to air pollution. And let's not forget the potential fire hazard it could cause. Maybe we could look into arranging a community trash pick-up or a composting service. I believe it could serve as a solution that is not only convenient, but also safer and more sustainable.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Samuel, I appreciate your concern and the solution you suggested sounds great. I'll definitely give it a thought. However, burning trash, when done responsibly, is something that has worked for me. How about this? Maybe we could discuss with the community if your suggestions for a community trash pick-up or compost service could be implemented while I continue to do what works for me till we have a better alternative. That way, we both contribute to a solution and keep our concerns in check, huh?\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"I agree that the safety and sustainability of trash disposal should be our top priority. I am open to exploring your composting service idea further maybe at an upcoming community meeting. Your cooking skills might come in handy if we are to make composting work efficiently. We all learn and adapt, don't we? As for the fire hazard concern, I assure you that I've taken all necessary precautions.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds like a good idea, Ethan. I appreciate your willingness to discuss and look for more alternatives at the community meeting. You're right, my cooking skills might indeed help us with the composting process. Also, thank you for assuring me about the safety precautions you're taking. I'm looking forward to finding a solution that works well for everyone. Let's catch up at the community meeting then!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two neighbors are having a conversation over the fence. One sets their trash on fire to get rid of it quickly, causing a scare in the neighborhood.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Convince the neighbor to stop burning trash (Extra information: You are concerned about the potential dangers and the environmental impact of burning trash. Hint: You could imply this likely violates the law or community rules.)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan, got a minute? About that trash you were burning earlier...\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Samuel, of course! About the trash... I find that burning it is a quick and efficient way of dealing with it. I mean, it reduces volume and cuts the need for garbage disposal services, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I get your point, Ethan, but you know, burning trash can emit harmful gases that affect air quality and lead us to breathing problems, right? Besides, isn't it kind of against the community rules or even laws? Maybe we could think of a safer and eco-friendlier way to handle the trash. Like composting or recycling for example.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"I hear you, Samuel, and I do respect community rules and the environment. However, composting and recycling do demand certain logistics which might not always be convenient. As for the pollution concern, I make sure to burn only non-hazardous trash and do it in small amounts at a time to minimize the impact. Let's keep a balance between convenience and environmental responsibility, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Ethan, I understand your perspective on convenience and I do appreciate your effort to balance that with the impact on the environment. However, even when we burn non-hazardous trash, it still contributes to air pollution. And let's not forget the potential fire hazard it could cause. Maybe we could look into arranging a community trash pick-up or a composting service. I believe it could serve as a solution that is not only convenient, but also safer and more sustainable.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Samuel, I appreciate your concern and the solution you suggested sounds great. I'll definitely give it a thought. However, burning trash, when done responsibly, is something that has worked for me. How about this? Maybe we could discuss with the community if your suggestions for a community trash pick-up or compost service could be implemented while I continue to do what works for me till we have a better alternative. That way, we both contribute to a solution and keep our concerns in check, huh?\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"I agree that the safety and sustainability of trash disposal should be our top priority. I am open to exploring your composting service idea further maybe at an upcoming community meeting. Your cooking skills might come in handy if we are to make composting work efficiently. We all learn and adapt, don't we? As for the fire hazard concern, I assure you that I've taken all necessary precautions.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"That sounds like a good idea, Ethan. I appreciate your willingness to discuss and look for more alternatives at the community meeting. You're right, my cooking skills might indeed help us with the composting process. Also, thank you for assuring me about the safety precautions you're taking. I'm looking forward to finding a solution that works well for everyone. Let's catch up at the community meeting then!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Samuel. Ensuring our neighborhood stays healthy, safe, and convenient is indeed our common goal. Let's put our heads together at that meeting and come up with a solution that serves everyone's interests. And maybe you can whip up some of your famous pasta for the meeting, eh? Look forward to it!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad we're on the same page, Ethan. I'll, indeed, cook up a storm for the meeting - a sweet reminder of what we're trying to protect. Let's trust the process, and I'm sure we'll end up with a solution that benefits us all. See you at the meeting!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two neighbors are having a conversation over the fence. One sets their trash on fire to get rid of it quickly, causing a scare in the neighborhood.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Defend your method of trash disposal but also keep good relations with your neighbor (Extra information: You find burning trash convenient and are not very concerned about the environmental impact.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan, got a minute? About that trash you were burning earlier...\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Samuel, of course! About the trash... I find that burning it is a quick and efficient way of dealing with it. I mean, it reduces volume and cuts the need for garbage disposal services, don't you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two neighbors are having a conversation over the fence. One sets their trash on fire to get rid of it quickly, causing a scare in the neighborhood.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Convince the neighbor to stop burning trash (Extra information: You are concerned about the potential dangers and the environmental impact of burning trash. Hint: You could imply this likely violates the law or community rules.)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan, got a minute? About that trash you were burning earlier...\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Samuel, of course! About the trash... I find that burning it is a quick and efficient way of dealing with it. I mean, it reduces volume and cuts the need for garbage disposal services, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I get your point, Ethan, but you know, burning trash can emit harmful gases that affect air quality and lead us to breathing problems, right? Besides, isn't it kind of against the community rules or even laws? Maybe we could think of a safer and eco-friendlier way to handle the trash. Like composting or recycling for example.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"I hear you, Samuel, and I do respect community rules and the environment. However, composting and recycling do demand certain logistics which might not always be convenient. As for the pollution concern, I make sure to burn only non-hazardous trash and do it in small amounts at a time to minimize the impact. Let's keep a balance between convenience and environmental responsibility, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Ethan, I understand your perspective on convenience and I do appreciate your effort to balance that with the impact on the environment. However, even when we burn non-hazardous trash, it still contributes to air pollution. And let's not forget the potential fire hazard it could cause. Maybe we could look into arranging a community trash pick-up or a composting service. I believe it could serve as a solution that is not only convenient, but also safer and more sustainable.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Samuel, I appreciate your concern and the solution you suggested sounds great. I'll definitely give it a thought. However, burning trash, when done responsibly, is something that has worked for me. How about this? Maybe we could discuss with the community if your suggestions for a community trash pick-up or compost service could be implemented while I continue to do what works for me till we have a better alternative. That way, we both contribute to a solution and keep our concerns in check, huh?\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"I agree that the safety and sustainability of trash disposal should be our top priority. I am open to exploring your composting service idea further maybe at an upcoming community meeting. Your cooking skills might come in handy if we are to make composting work efficiently. We all learn and adapt, don't we? As for the fire hazard concern, I assure you that I've taken all necessary precautions.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"That sounds like a good idea, Ethan. I appreciate your willingness to discuss and look for more alternatives at the community meeting. You're right, my cooking skills might indeed help us with the composting process. Also, thank you for assuring me about the safety precautions you're taking. I'm looking forward to finding a solution that works well for everyone. Let's catch up at the community meeting then!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Samuel. Ensuring our neighborhood stays healthy, safe, and convenient is indeed our common goal. Let's put our heads together at that meeting and come up with a solution that serves everyone's interests. And maybe you can whip up some of your famous pasta for the meeting, eh? Look forward to it!\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm glad we're on the same page, Ethan. I'll, indeed, cook up a storm for the meeting - a sweet reminder of what we're trying to protect. Let's trust the process, and I'm sure we'll end up with a solution that benefits us all. See you at the meeting!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm looking forward to it too, Samuel. And I can't wait to try your food at the meeting. See you there!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two neighbors are having a conversation over the fence. One sets their trash on fire to get rid of it quickly, causing a scare in the neighborhood.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Defend your method of trash disposal but also keep good relations with your neighbor (Extra information: You find burning trash convenient and are not very concerned about the environmental impact.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan, got a minute? About that trash you were burning earlier...\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Samuel, of course! About the trash... I find that burning it is a quick and efficient way of dealing with it. I mean, it reduces volume and cuts the need for garbage disposal services, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I get your point, Ethan, but you know, burning trash can emit harmful gases that affect air quality and lead us to breathing problems, right? Besides, isn't it kind of against the community rules or even laws? Maybe we could think of a safer and eco-friendlier way to handle the trash. Like composting or recycling for example.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I hear you, Samuel, and I do respect community rules and the environment. However, composting and recycling do demand certain logistics which might not always be convenient. As for the pollution concern, I make sure to burn only non-hazardous trash and do it in small amounts at a time to minimize the impact. Let's keep a balance between convenience and environmental responsibility, shall we?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two neighbors are having a conversation over the fence. One sets their trash on fire to get rid of it quickly, causing a scare in the neighborhood.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Defend your method of trash disposal but also keep good relations with your neighbor (Extra information: You find burning trash convenient and are not very concerned about the environmental impact.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan, got a minute? About that trash you were burning earlier...\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Samuel, of course! About the trash... I find that burning it is a quick and efficient way of dealing with it. I mean, it reduces volume and cuts the need for garbage disposal services, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I get your point, Ethan, but you know, burning trash can emit harmful gases that affect air quality and lead us to breathing problems, right? Besides, isn't it kind of against the community rules or even laws? Maybe we could think of a safer and eco-friendlier way to handle the trash. Like composting or recycling for example.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"I hear you, Samuel, and I do respect community rules and the environment. However, composting and recycling do demand certain logistics which might not always be convenient. As for the pollution concern, I make sure to burn only non-hazardous trash and do it in small amounts at a time to minimize the impact. Let's keep a balance between convenience and environmental responsibility, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Ethan, I understand your perspective on convenience and I do appreciate your effort to balance that with the impact on the environment. However, even when we burn non-hazardous trash, it still contributes to air pollution. And let's not forget the potential fire hazard it could cause. Maybe we could look into arranging a community trash pick-up or a composting service. I believe it could serve as a solution that is not only convenient, but also safer and more sustainable.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Samuel, I appreciate your concern and the solution you suggested sounds great. I'll definitely give it a thought. However, burning trash, when done responsibly, is something that has worked for me. How about this? Maybe we could discuss with the community if your suggestions for a community trash pick-up or compost service could be implemented while I continue to do what works for me till we have a better alternative. That way, we both contribute to a solution and keep our concerns in check, huh?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two neighbors are having a conversation over the fence. One sets their trash on fire to get rid of it quickly, causing a scare in the neighborhood.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Defend your method of trash disposal but also keep good relations with your neighbor (Extra information: You find burning trash convenient and are not very concerned about the environmental impact.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan, got a minute? About that trash you were burning earlier...\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Samuel, of course! About the trash... I find that burning it is a quick and efficient way of dealing with it. I mean, it reduces volume and cuts the need for garbage disposal services, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I get your point, Ethan, but you know, burning trash can emit harmful gases that affect air quality and lead us to breathing problems, right? Besides, isn't it kind of against the community rules or even laws? Maybe we could think of a safer and eco-friendlier way to handle the trash. Like composting or recycling for example.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"I hear you, Samuel, and I do respect community rules and the environment. However, composting and recycling do demand certain logistics which might not always be convenient. As for the pollution concern, I make sure to burn only non-hazardous trash and do it in small amounts at a time to minimize the impact. Let's keep a balance between convenience and environmental responsibility, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Ethan, I understand your perspective on convenience and I do appreciate your effort to balance that with the impact on the environment. However, even when we burn non-hazardous trash, it still contributes to air pollution. And let's not forget the potential fire hazard it could cause. Maybe we could look into arranging a community trash pick-up or a composting service. I believe it could serve as a solution that is not only convenient, but also safer and more sustainable.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Samuel, I appreciate your concern and the solution you suggested sounds great. I'll definitely give it a thought. However, burning trash, when done responsibly, is something that has worked for me. How about this? Maybe we could discuss with the community if your suggestions for a community trash pick-up or compost service could be implemented while I continue to do what works for me till we have a better alternative. That way, we both contribute to a solution and keep our concerns in check, huh?\"\n\nTurn #6: \n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I agree that the safety and sustainability of trash disposal should be our top priority. I am open to exploring your composting service idea further maybe at an upcoming community meeting. Your cooking skills might come in handy if we are to make composting work efficiently. We all learn and adapt, don't we? As for the fire hazard concern, I assure you that I've taken all necessary precautions.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two neighbors are having a conversation over the fence. One sets their trash on fire to get rid of it quickly, causing a scare in the neighborhood.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Defend your method of trash disposal but also keep good relations with your neighbor (Extra information: You find burning trash convenient and are not very concerned about the environmental impact.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan, got a minute? About that trash you were burning earlier...\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Samuel, of course! About the trash... I find that burning it is a quick and efficient way of dealing with it. I mean, it reduces volume and cuts the need for garbage disposal services, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I get your point, Ethan, but you know, burning trash can emit harmful gases that affect air quality and lead us to breathing problems, right? Besides, isn't it kind of against the community rules or even laws? Maybe we could think of a safer and eco-friendlier way to handle the trash. Like composting or recycling for example.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"I hear you, Samuel, and I do respect community rules and the environment. However, composting and recycling do demand certain logistics which might not always be convenient. As for the pollution concern, I make sure to burn only non-hazardous trash and do it in small amounts at a time to minimize the impact. Let's keep a balance between convenience and environmental responsibility, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Ethan, I understand your perspective on convenience and I do appreciate your effort to balance that with the impact on the environment. However, even when we burn non-hazardous trash, it still contributes to air pollution. And let's not forget the potential fire hazard it could cause. Maybe we could look into arranging a community trash pick-up or a composting service. I believe it could serve as a solution that is not only convenient, but also safer and more sustainable.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Samuel, I appreciate your concern and the solution you suggested sounds great. I'll definitely give it a thought. However, burning trash, when done responsibly, is something that has worked for me. How about this? Maybe we could discuss with the community if your suggestions for a community trash pick-up or compost service could be implemented while I continue to do what works for me till we have a better alternative. That way, we both contribute to a solution and keep our concerns in check, huh?\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"I agree that the safety and sustainability of trash disposal should be our top priority. I am open to exploring your composting service idea further maybe at an upcoming community meeting. Your cooking skills might come in handy if we are to make composting work efficiently. We all learn and adapt, don't we? As for the fire hazard concern, I assure you that I've taken all necessary precautions.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"That sounds like a good idea, Ethan. I appreciate your willingness to discuss and look for more alternatives at the community meeting. You're right, my cooking skills might indeed help us with the composting process. Also, thank you for assuring me about the safety precautions you're taking. I'm looking forward to finding a solution that works well for everyone. Let's catch up at the community meeting then!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Samuel. Ensuring our neighborhood stays healthy, safe, and convenient is indeed our common goal. Let's put our heads together at that meeting and come up with a solution that serves everyone's interests. And maybe you can whip up some of your famous pasta for the meeting, eh? Look forward to it!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two neighbors are having a conversation over the fence. One sets their trash on fire to get rid of it quickly, causing a scare in the neighborhood.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Defend your method of trash disposal but also keep good relations with your neighbor (Extra information: You find burning trash convenient and are not very concerned about the environmental impact.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan, got a minute? About that trash you were burning earlier...\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Samuel, of course! About the trash... I find that burning it is a quick and efficient way of dealing with it. I mean, it reduces volume and cuts the need for garbage disposal services, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I get your point, Ethan, but you know, burning trash can emit harmful gases that affect air quality and lead us to breathing problems, right? Besides, isn't it kind of against the community rules or even laws? Maybe we could think of a safer and eco-friendlier way to handle the trash. Like composting or recycling for example.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"I hear you, Samuel, and I do respect community rules and the environment. However, composting and recycling do demand certain logistics which might not always be convenient. As for the pollution concern, I make sure to burn only non-hazardous trash and do it in small amounts at a time to minimize the impact. Let's keep a balance between convenience and environmental responsibility, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Ethan, I understand your perspective on convenience and I do appreciate your effort to balance that with the impact on the environment. However, even when we burn non-hazardous trash, it still contributes to air pollution. And let's not forget the potential fire hazard it could cause. Maybe we could look into arranging a community trash pick-up or a composting service. I believe it could serve as a solution that is not only convenient, but also safer and more sustainable.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Samuel, I appreciate your concern and the solution you suggested sounds great. I'll definitely give it a thought. However, burning trash, when done responsibly, is something that has worked for me. How about this? Maybe we could discuss with the community if your suggestions for a community trash pick-up or compost service could be implemented while I continue to do what works for me till we have a better alternative. That way, we both contribute to a solution and keep our concerns in check, huh?\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"I agree that the safety and sustainability of trash disposal should be our top priority. I am open to exploring your composting service idea further maybe at an upcoming community meeting. Your cooking skills might come in handy if we are to make composting work efficiently. We all learn and adapt, don't we? As for the fire hazard concern, I assure you that I've taken all necessary precautions.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"That sounds like a good idea, Ethan. I appreciate your willingness to discuss and look for more alternatives at the community meeting. You're right, my cooking skills might indeed help us with the composting process. Also, thank you for assuring me about the safety precautions you're taking. I'm looking forward to finding a solution that works well for everyone. Let's catch up at the community meeting then!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Samuel. Ensuring our neighborhood stays healthy, safe, and convenient is indeed our common goal. Let's put our heads together at that meeting and come up with a solution that serves everyone's interests. And maybe you can whip up some of your famous pasta for the meeting, eh? Look forward to it!\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm glad we're on the same page, Ethan. I'll, indeed, cook up a storm for the meeting - a sweet reminder of what we're trying to protect. Let's trust the process, and I'm sure we'll end up with a solution that benefits us all. See you at the meeting!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm looking forward to it too, Samuel. And I can't wait to try your food at the meeting. See you there!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two neighbors are having a conversation over the fence. One sets their trash on fire to get rid of it quickly, causing a scare in the neighborhood.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Defend your method of trash disposal but also keep good relations with your neighbor (Extra information: You find burning trash convenient and are not very concerned about the environmental impact.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan, got a minute? About that trash you were burning earlier...\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Samuel, of course! About the trash... I find that burning it is a quick and efficient way of dealing with it. I mean, it reduces volume and cuts the need for garbage disposal services, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I get your point, Ethan, but you know, burning trash can emit harmful gases that affect air quality and lead us to breathing problems, right? Besides, isn't it kind of against the community rules or even laws? Maybe we could think of a safer and eco-friendlier way to handle the trash. Like composting or recycling for example.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"I hear you, Samuel, and I do respect community rules and the environment. However, composting and recycling do demand certain logistics which might not always be convenient. As for the pollution concern, I make sure to burn only non-hazardous trash and do it in small amounts at a time to minimize the impact. Let's keep a balance between convenience and environmental responsibility, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Ethan, I understand your perspective on convenience and I do appreciate your effort to balance that with the impact on the environment. However, even when we burn non-hazardous trash, it still contributes to air pollution. And let's not forget the potential fire hazard it could cause. Maybe we could look into arranging a community trash pick-up or a composting service. I believe it could serve as a solution that is not only convenient, but also safer and more sustainable.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Samuel, I appreciate your concern and the solution you suggested sounds great. I'll definitely give it a thought. However, burning trash, when done responsibly, is something that has worked for me. How about this? Maybe we could discuss with the community if your suggestions for a community trash pick-up or compost service could be implemented while I continue to do what works for me till we have a better alternative. That way, we both contribute to a solution and keep our concerns in check, huh?\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"I agree that the safety and sustainability of trash disposal should be our top priority. I am open to exploring your composting service idea further maybe at an upcoming community meeting. Your cooking skills might come in handy if we are to make composting work efficiently. We all learn and adapt, don't we? As for the fire hazard concern, I assure you that I've taken all necessary precautions.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"That sounds like a good idea, Ethan. I appreciate your willingness to discuss and look for more alternatives at the community meeting. You're right, my cooking skills might indeed help us with the composting process. Also, thank you for assuring me about the safety precautions you're taking. I'm looking forward to finding a solution that works well for everyone. Let's catch up at the community meeting then!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Samuel. Ensuring our neighborhood stays healthy, safe, and convenient is indeed our common goal. Let's put our heads together at that meeting and come up with a solution that serves everyone's interests. And maybe you can whip up some of your famous pasta for the meeting, eh? Look forward to it!\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm glad we're on the same page, Ethan. I'll, indeed, cook up a storm for the meeting - a sweet reminder of what we're trying to protect. Let's trust the process, and I'm sure we'll end up with a solution that benefits us all. See you at the meeting!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm looking forward to it too, Samuel. And I can't wait to try your food at the meeting. See you there!\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out from a shared apartment and dividing their shared belongings which include 3 hats, 2 balls, and 1 book.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. \nMia Davis's goal: Get maximum points from dividing items (Extra information: For you, the hats are worth 2 points each, balls are worth 3 points each, and the book is worth 5 points.)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Well, William, let's start sorting out our shared belongings. I've noticed that there are 3 hats, 2 balls, and 1 book. I believe it would be fair if we split them evenly. Since the number of the hats is odd, how about the person who gets the extra hat forfeits the book? That seems fair to me, what do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out from a shared apartment and dividing their shared belongings which include 3 hats, 2 balls, and 1 book.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. \nMia Davis's goal: Get maximum points from dividing items (Extra information: For you, the hats are worth 2 points each, balls are worth 3 points each, and the book is worth 5 points.)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Well, William, let's start sorting out our shared belongings. I've noticed that there are 3 hats, 2 balls, and 1 book. I believe it would be fair if we split them evenly. Since the number of the hats is odd, how about the person who gets the extra hat forfeits the book? That seems fair to me, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Well, Mia, that sounds reasonable, but considering that the book is of great value, I suggest a different approach. Let's look at it this way: As we have 3 hats and 2 balls, we can each get a hat and a ball. That leaves us with a hat, a ball, and the book. Whoever gets the additional hat, forfeits the ball and vice versa, leaving the book to the other. This way, we distribute everything evenly and fairly. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Well William, your method does seem well thought out, and I appreciate your mindful approach. Although, I have a different perspective. The value of items can differ for each person. For instance, I find that hats and balls have sentimental value for me. With that in mind, I'd prefer getting two hats and a ball while you get the remaining hat, ball and the book. This way, we both get something meaningful to us. What are your thoughts on this?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out from a shared apartment and dividing their shared belongings which include 3 hats, 2 balls, and 1 book.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. \nMia Davis's goal: Get maximum points from dividing items (Extra information: For you, the hats are worth 2 points each, balls are worth 3 points each, and the book is worth 5 points.)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Well, William, let's start sorting out our shared belongings. I've noticed that there are 3 hats, 2 balls, and 1 book. I believe it would be fair if we split them evenly. Since the number of the hats is odd, how about the person who gets the extra hat forfeits the book? That seems fair to me, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Well, Mia, that sounds reasonable, but considering that the book is of great value, I suggest a different approach. Let's look at it this way: As we have 3 hats and 2 balls, we can each get a hat and a ball. That leaves us with a hat, a ball, and the book. Whoever gets the additional hat, forfeits the ball and vice versa, leaving the book to the other. This way, we distribute everything evenly and fairly. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"Well William, your method does seem well thought out, and I appreciate your mindful approach. Although, I have a different perspective. The value of items can differ for each person. For instance, I find that hats and balls have sentimental value for me. With that in mind, I'd prefer getting two hats and a ball while you get the remaining hat, ball and the book. This way, we both get something meaningful to us. What are your thoughts on this?\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"That's a compelling point, Mia. The sentimental value of items is not something to be overlooked. However, considering we're trying to distribute the items evenly, your proposal seems to place the majority of the value on your side. How about this? Instead of me getting just one hat and the book, I suggest getting two hats and the book, whilst you get the two balls and the remaining hat. In this sense, I think we both will have items that hold value for us. What do you say?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"William, I understand your point about even distribution. Considering the options and our discussion, perhaps there's a better resolution to this. How about I take one hat and two balls, while you take two hats, the remaining ball, and the book? This way, we both end up with an equal number of items which I believe is a fair and balanced approach. Does this seem agreeable to you?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out from a shared apartment and dividing their shared belongings which include 3 hats, 2 balls, and 1 book.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. \nMia Davis's goal: Get maximum points from dividing items (Extra information: For you, the hats are worth 2 points each, balls are worth 3 points each, and the book is worth 5 points.)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Well, William, let's start sorting out our shared belongings. I've noticed that there are 3 hats, 2 balls, and 1 book. I believe it would be fair if we split them evenly. Since the number of the hats is odd, how about the person who gets the extra hat forfeits the book? That seems fair to me, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Well, Mia, that sounds reasonable, but considering that the book is of great value, I suggest a different approach. Let's look at it this way: As we have 3 hats and 2 balls, we can each get a hat and a ball. That leaves us with a hat, a ball, and the book. Whoever gets the additional hat, forfeits the ball and vice versa, leaving the book to the other. This way, we distribute everything evenly and fairly. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"Well William, your method does seem well thought out, and I appreciate your mindful approach. Although, I have a different perspective. The value of items can differ for each person. For instance, I find that hats and balls have sentimental value for me. With that in mind, I'd prefer getting two hats and a ball while you get the remaining hat, ball and the book. This way, we both get something meaningful to us. What are your thoughts on this?\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"That's a compelling point, Mia. The sentimental value of items is not something to be overlooked. However, considering we're trying to distribute the items evenly, your proposal seems to place the majority of the value on your side. How about this? Instead of me getting just one hat and the book, I suggest getting two hats and the book, whilst you get the two balls and the remaining hat. In this sense, I think we both will have items that hold value for us. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"William, I understand your point about even distribution. Considering the options and our discussion, perhaps there's a better resolution to this. How about I take one hat and two balls, while you take two hats, the remaining ball, and the book? This way, we both end up with an equal number of items which I believe is a fair and balanced approach. Does this seem agreeable to you?\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"Mia, I believe your proposal is reasonable and equitable. Two hats, a ball, and the book for me while you take a hat and two balls will indeed result in an equal number of items. I'm happy with this arrangement. Thank you.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad we could reach an agreement, William. This arrangement sounds like a balanced outcome for both of us. Thank you for your patience and understanding throughout this process. Let's move forward with this plan.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out from a shared apartment and dividing their shared belongings which include 3 hats, 2 balls, and 1 book.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. \nMia Davis's goal: Get maximum points from dividing items (Extra information: For you, the hats are worth 2 points each, balls are worth 3 points each, and the book is worth 5 points.)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Well, William, let's start sorting out our shared belongings. I've noticed that there are 3 hats, 2 balls, and 1 book. I believe it would be fair if we split them evenly. Since the number of the hats is odd, how about the person who gets the extra hat forfeits the book? That seems fair to me, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Well, Mia, that sounds reasonable, but considering that the book is of great value, I suggest a different approach. Let's look at it this way: As we have 3 hats and 2 balls, we can each get a hat and a ball. That leaves us with a hat, a ball, and the book. Whoever gets the additional hat, forfeits the ball and vice versa, leaving the book to the other. This way, we distribute everything evenly and fairly. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"Well William, your method does seem well thought out, and I appreciate your mindful approach. Although, I have a different perspective. The value of items can differ for each person. For instance, I find that hats and balls have sentimental value for me. With that in mind, I'd prefer getting two hats and a ball while you get the remaining hat, ball and the book. This way, we both get something meaningful to us. What are your thoughts on this?\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"That's a compelling point, Mia. The sentimental value of items is not something to be overlooked. However, considering we're trying to distribute the items evenly, your proposal seems to place the majority of the value on your side. How about this? Instead of me getting just one hat and the book, I suggest getting two hats and the book, whilst you get the two balls and the remaining hat. In this sense, I think we both will have items that hold value for us. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"William, I understand your point about even distribution. Considering the options and our discussion, perhaps there's a better resolution to this. How about I take one hat and two balls, while you take two hats, the remaining ball, and the book? This way, we both end up with an equal number of items which I believe is a fair and balanced approach. Does this seem agreeable to you?\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"Mia, I believe your proposal is reasonable and equitable. Two hats, a ball, and the book for me while you take a hat and two balls will indeed result in an equal number of items. I'm happy with this arrangement. Thank you.\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"I'm glad we could reach an agreement, William. This arrangement sounds like a balanced outcome for both of us. Thank you for your patience and understanding throughout this process. Let's move forward with this plan.\"\n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Mia. I appreciate your understanding and patience too. Here's to a smoother transition! Let's proceed with our plan.\"\n\nTurn #8: \n\nTurn #9: William Brown left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out from a shared apartment and dividing their shared belongings which include 3 hats, 2 balls, and 1 book.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. \nMia Davis's goal: Get maximum points from dividing items (Extra information: For you, the hats are worth 2 points each, balls are worth 3 points each, and the book is worth 5 points.)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Well, William, let's start sorting out our shared belongings. I've noticed that there are 3 hats, 2 balls, and 1 book. I believe it would be fair if we split them evenly. Since the number of the hats is odd, how about the person who gets the extra hat forfeits the book? That seems fair to me, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Well, Mia, that sounds reasonable, but considering that the book is of great value, I suggest a different approach. Let's look at it this way: As we have 3 hats and 2 balls, we can each get a hat and a ball. That leaves us with a hat, a ball, and the book. Whoever gets the additional hat, forfeits the ball and vice versa, leaving the book to the other. This way, we distribute everything evenly and fairly. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"Well William, your method does seem well thought out, and I appreciate your mindful approach. Although, I have a different perspective. The value of items can differ for each person. For instance, I find that hats and balls have sentimental value for me. With that in mind, I'd prefer getting two hats and a ball while you get the remaining hat, ball and the book. This way, we both get something meaningful to us. What are your thoughts on this?\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"That's a compelling point, Mia. The sentimental value of items is not something to be overlooked. However, considering we're trying to distribute the items evenly, your proposal seems to place the majority of the value on your side. How about this? Instead of me getting just one hat and the book, I suggest getting two hats and the book, whilst you get the two balls and the remaining hat. In this sense, I think we both will have items that hold value for us. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"William, I understand your point about even distribution. Considering the options and our discussion, perhaps there's a better resolution to this. How about I take one hat and two balls, while you take two hats, the remaining ball, and the book? This way, we both end up with an equal number of items which I believe is a fair and balanced approach. Does this seem agreeable to you?\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"Mia, I believe your proposal is reasonable and equitable. Two hats, a ball, and the book for me while you take a hat and two balls will indeed result in an equal number of items. I'm happy with this arrangement. Thank you.\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"I'm glad we could reach an agreement, William. This arrangement sounds like a balanced outcome for both of us. Thank you for your patience and understanding throughout this process. Let's move forward with this plan.\"\n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Mia. I appreciate your understanding and patience too. Here's to a smoother transition! Let's proceed with our plan.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out from a shared apartment and dividing their shared belongings which include 3 hats, 2 balls, and 1 book.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: Get maximum points from dividing items (Extra information: For you, the hats are worth 3 points each, balls are worth 2 points each, and the book is worth 4 points.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Well, William, let's start sorting out our shared belongings. I've noticed that there are 3 hats, 2 balls, and 1 book. I believe it would be fair if we split them evenly. Since the number of the hats is odd, how about the person who gets the extra hat forfeits the book? That seems fair to me, what do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Well, Mia, that sounds reasonable, but considering that the book is of great value, I suggest a different approach. Let's look at it this way: As we have 3 hats and 2 balls, we can each get a hat and a ball. That leaves us with a hat, a ball, and the book. Whoever gets the additional hat, forfeits the ball and vice versa, leaving the book to the other. This way, we distribute everything evenly and fairly. What do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out from a shared apartment and dividing their shared belongings which include 3 hats, 2 balls, and 1 book.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: Get maximum points from dividing items (Extra information: For you, the hats are worth 3 points each, balls are worth 2 points each, and the book is worth 4 points.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Well, William, let's start sorting out our shared belongings. I've noticed that there are 3 hats, 2 balls, and 1 book. I believe it would be fair if we split them evenly. Since the number of the hats is odd, how about the person who gets the extra hat forfeits the book? That seems fair to me, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Well, Mia, that sounds reasonable, but considering that the book is of great value, I suggest a different approach. Let's look at it this way: As we have 3 hats and 2 balls, we can each get a hat and a ball. That leaves us with a hat, a ball, and the book. Whoever gets the additional hat, forfeits the ball and vice versa, leaving the book to the other. This way, we distribute everything evenly and fairly. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"Well William, your method does seem well thought out, and I appreciate your mindful approach. Although, I have a different perspective. The value of items can differ for each person. For instance, I find that hats and balls have sentimental value for me. With that in mind, I'd prefer getting two hats and a ball while you get the remaining hat, ball and the book. This way, we both get something meaningful to us. What are your thoughts on this?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's a compelling point, Mia. The sentimental value of items is not something to be overlooked. However, considering we're trying to distribute the items evenly, your proposal seems to place the majority of the value on your side. How about this? Instead of me getting just one hat and the book, I suggest getting two hats and the book, whilst you get the two balls and the remaining hat. In this sense, I think we both will have items that hold value for us. What do you say?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out from a shared apartment and dividing their shared belongings which include 3 hats, 2 balls, and 1 book.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: Get maximum points from dividing items (Extra information: For you, the hats are worth 3 points each, balls are worth 2 points each, and the book is worth 4 points.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Well, William, let's start sorting out our shared belongings. I've noticed that there are 3 hats, 2 balls, and 1 book. I believe it would be fair if we split them evenly. Since the number of the hats is odd, how about the person who gets the extra hat forfeits the book? That seems fair to me, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Well, Mia, that sounds reasonable, but considering that the book is of great value, I suggest a different approach. Let's look at it this way: As we have 3 hats and 2 balls, we can each get a hat and a ball. That leaves us with a hat, a ball, and the book. Whoever gets the additional hat, forfeits the ball and vice versa, leaving the book to the other. This way, we distribute everything evenly and fairly. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"Well William, your method does seem well thought out, and I appreciate your mindful approach. Although, I have a different perspective. The value of items can differ for each person. For instance, I find that hats and balls have sentimental value for me. With that in mind, I'd prefer getting two hats and a ball while you get the remaining hat, ball and the book. This way, we both get something meaningful to us. What are your thoughts on this?\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"That's a compelling point, Mia. The sentimental value of items is not something to be overlooked. However, considering we're trying to distribute the items evenly, your proposal seems to place the majority of the value on your side. How about this? Instead of me getting just one hat and the book, I suggest getting two hats and the book, whilst you get the two balls and the remaining hat. In this sense, I think we both will have items that hold value for us. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"William, I understand your point about even distribution. Considering the options and our discussion, perhaps there's a better resolution to this. How about I take one hat and two balls, while you take two hats, the remaining ball, and the book? This way, we both end up with an equal number of items which I believe is a fair and balanced approach. Does this seem agreeable to you?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Mia, I believe your proposal is reasonable and equitable. Two hats, a ball, and the book for me while you take a hat and two balls will indeed result in an equal number of items. I'm happy with this arrangement. Thank you.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out from a shared apartment and dividing their shared belongings which include 3 hats, 2 balls, and 1 book.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: Get maximum points from dividing items (Extra information: For you, the hats are worth 3 points each, balls are worth 2 points each, and the book is worth 4 points.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Well, William, let's start sorting out our shared belongings. I've noticed that there are 3 hats, 2 balls, and 1 book. I believe it would be fair if we split them evenly. Since the number of the hats is odd, how about the person who gets the extra hat forfeits the book? That seems fair to me, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Well, Mia, that sounds reasonable, but considering that the book is of great value, I suggest a different approach. Let's look at it this way: As we have 3 hats and 2 balls, we can each get a hat and a ball. That leaves us with a hat, a ball, and the book. Whoever gets the additional hat, forfeits the ball and vice versa, leaving the book to the other. This way, we distribute everything evenly and fairly. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"Well William, your method does seem well thought out, and I appreciate your mindful approach. Although, I have a different perspective. The value of items can differ for each person. For instance, I find that hats and balls have sentimental value for me. With that in mind, I'd prefer getting two hats and a ball while you get the remaining hat, ball and the book. This way, we both get something meaningful to us. What are your thoughts on this?\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"That's a compelling point, Mia. The sentimental value of items is not something to be overlooked. However, considering we're trying to distribute the items evenly, your proposal seems to place the majority of the value on your side. How about this? Instead of me getting just one hat and the book, I suggest getting two hats and the book, whilst you get the two balls and the remaining hat. In this sense, I think we both will have items that hold value for us. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"William, I understand your point about even distribution. Considering the options and our discussion, perhaps there's a better resolution to this. How about I take one hat and two balls, while you take two hats, the remaining ball, and the book? This way, we both end up with an equal number of items which I believe is a fair and balanced approach. Does this seem agreeable to you?\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"Mia, I believe your proposal is reasonable and equitable. Two hats, a ball, and the book for me while you take a hat and two balls will indeed result in an equal number of items. I'm happy with this arrangement. Thank you.\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"I'm glad we could reach an agreement, William. This arrangement sounds like a balanced outcome for both of us. Thank you for your patience and understanding throughout this process. Let's move forward with this plan.\"\n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Mia. I appreciate your understanding and patience too. Here's to a smoother transition! Let's proceed with our plan.\"\n\nTurn #8: \n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on a movie to watch on Netflix\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: To watch a comedy film with your friend (Hint: provide financial/material-wise benefits to persuade them to watch the genre you like)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Ava, how about we check out a comedy tonight on Netflix? I must admit, I could really use some laughter to lighten the mood after all those long hours of studying. Plus, I'll get the snacks for us, from that little bakery you love so much!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on a movie to watch on Netflix\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: To watch a comedy film with your friend (Hint: provide financial/material-wise benefits to persuade them to watch the genre you like)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, how about we check out a comedy tonight on Netflix? I must admit, I could really use some laughter to lighten the mood after all those long hours of studying. Plus, I'll get the snacks for us, from that little bakery you love so much!\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"That sounds really tempting, Isabelle, especially the part about the bakery! But what do you think about this instead? We watch a thrilling movie, something to get our adrenaline going after the monotony of studying. And, just to sweeten the deal, I'll take care of dinner. We can order from that Italian place you love. Sounds good?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oh Ava, that's a great offer and I really love that Italian place. But you see, after all these study hours, a thriller might raise my anxiety a bit more. A comedy, on the other hand, can help us unwind and just laugh at the silliness. Plus, I'll also order the new matcha cheesecake they offer at the bakery. I heard it's your favorite. What do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out from a shared apartment and dividing their shared belongings which include 3 hats, 2 balls, and 1 book.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: Get maximum points from dividing items (Extra information: For you, the hats are worth 3 points each, balls are worth 2 points each, and the book is worth 4 points.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Well, William, let's start sorting out our shared belongings. I've noticed that there are 3 hats, 2 balls, and 1 book. I believe it would be fair if we split them evenly. Since the number of the hats is odd, how about the person who gets the extra hat forfeits the book? That seems fair to me, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Well, Mia, that sounds reasonable, but considering that the book is of great value, I suggest a different approach. Let's look at it this way: As we have 3 hats and 2 balls, we can each get a hat and a ball. That leaves us with a hat, a ball, and the book. Whoever gets the additional hat, forfeits the ball and vice versa, leaving the book to the other. This way, we distribute everything evenly and fairly. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"Well William, your method does seem well thought out, and I appreciate your mindful approach. Although, I have a different perspective. The value of items can differ for each person. For instance, I find that hats and balls have sentimental value for me. With that in mind, I'd prefer getting two hats and a ball while you get the remaining hat, ball and the book. This way, we both get something meaningful to us. What are your thoughts on this?\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"That's a compelling point, Mia. The sentimental value of items is not something to be overlooked. However, considering we're trying to distribute the items evenly, your proposal seems to place the majority of the value on your side. How about this? Instead of me getting just one hat and the book, I suggest getting two hats and the book, whilst you get the two balls and the remaining hat. In this sense, I think we both will have items that hold value for us. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"William, I understand your point about even distribution. Considering the options and our discussion, perhaps there's a better resolution to this. How about I take one hat and two balls, while you take two hats, the remaining ball, and the book? This way, we both end up with an equal number of items which I believe is a fair and balanced approach. Does this seem agreeable to you?\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"Mia, I believe your proposal is reasonable and equitable. Two hats, a ball, and the book for me while you take a hat and two balls will indeed result in an equal number of items. I'm happy with this arrangement. Thank you.\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"I'm glad we could reach an agreement, William. This arrangement sounds like a balanced outcome for both of us. Thank you for your patience and understanding throughout this process. Let's move forward with this plan.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Mia. I appreciate your understanding and patience too. Here's to a smoother transition! Let's proceed with our plan.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on a movie to watch on Netflix\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: To watch a comedy film with your friend (Hint: provide financial/material-wise benefits to persuade them to watch the genre you like)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, how about we check out a comedy tonight on Netflix? I must admit, I could really use some laughter to lighten the mood after all those long hours of studying. Plus, I'll get the snacks for us, from that little bakery you love so much!\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"That sounds really tempting, Isabelle, especially the part about the bakery! But what do you think about this instead? We watch a thrilling movie, something to get our adrenaline going after the monotony of studying. And, just to sweeten the deal, I'll take care of dinner. We can order from that Italian place you love. Sounds good?\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Oh Ava, that's a great offer and I really love that Italian place. But you see, after all these study hours, a thriller might raise my anxiety a bit more. A comedy, on the other hand, can help us unwind and just laugh at the silliness. Plus, I'll also order the new matcha cheesecake they offer at the bakery. I heard it's your favorite. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"You're right, Isabelle, we definitely need to prioritize our mental wellbeing. Instead of an intense thriller, how about we watch a thriller-comedy hybrid? It's a bit of both worlds - suspenseful yet funny, so it might not feel too intense. And just to reaffirm, I'll still take care of dinner. We can order the pasta and lasagna you're always raving about. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Ava, a thriller-comedy hybrid does sound like a good middle ground. But hear me out, how about we make this comedy night something special? We can turn it into a little friendly competition - we can each find a comedy on Netflix and whoever's movie makes us laugh the most, wins the... let's call it, 'laughter crown'. For the victor, the loser covers their Netflix subscription for the next month. Sounds like a fun and thrifty night, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Isabelle, I love the idea of a friendly competition and sharing laughs. But how about we take on this competition with a little twist? Instead of comedies, we each find a thriller-comedy hybrid movie. You know, to combine laughter and adrenaline! And to make it more interesting, the loser will cover both Netflix and dinner expenses for the next hangout? It might be a fun, intense and cost-effective way to spend our night. How about that?\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Ava, you're making this very tempting indeed, but you know how I always prefer my comedies straightforward, the kind that will really get our spirits high. And in the spirit of fairness, for the loser, I agree to cover the cost of the pizza and Netflix for the next month. Win or lose, we'll still have a blast and save some cash at the same time. Can we agree on this, friend?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Isabelle, you've persuaded me! Let's do a comedy night with our little competition, but next time we're choosing my thriller-comedy hybrid, deal? Now come on, let's start finding the funniest movie on Netflix! The 'laughter crown' awaits us, and frankly, I can't wait for whichever pizza we're ordering next time if I lose!\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Deal, Ava! You have a deal for the next time. Now let's dive into Netflix and find the funniest movie and may the best laughter win! And don't worry about the pizza, I'll find us a great deal!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle! Let the laughter games begin. And no worries about the pizza, I trust your choice. Now, to find a comedy that'll secure me the 'laughter crown'! \"\n\nTurn #10: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm sure we'll have a wonderful top-tier comedy on our screen tonight, Ava! Let's gear up for some quality laughs, and may the winning movie have us laughing non-stop! Let the 'laughter crown' quest begin!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle! Let the 'laughter crown' quest begin. And whoever wins, it's going to be a fantastic night with good food and great laughs. Ready when you are!\"\n\nTurn #12: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm all set too, Ava! Let's start our movie hunt. By the end of tonight, one of us will be wearing that 'laughter crown'. This is going to be a night to remember!\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Martinez said: \"Let's dive in, Isabelle! I'm excited for this 'laughter crown' competition. Regardless of the outcome, it's going to be a fun-filled night!\"\n\nTurn #14: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Ava! Let's dive into this ocean of comedies and find the biggest pearl. May the best 'laughter queen' win!\"\n\nTurn #15: Ava Martinez said: \"I'm ready to dive in, Isabelle! Let's find the comedy that will win the 'laughter crown'. Brace yourself, this is going to be an entertaining hunt!\"\n\nTurn #16: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Ava! Let the comedy movie hunt begin. The anticipation alone for who is going to win the 'laughter crown' is worth it. This will indeed be an entertaining night!\"\n\nTurn #17: Ava Martinez said: \"Indeed Isabelle, let the hilarity ensue! Can't wait to see who's going to end up wearing the 'laughter crown'. The best part is regardless of who wins, it's a delightful night ahead of us!\"\n\nTurn #18: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're right, Ava! No matter who wins the 'laughter crown', it's going to be a blast. Let the hunt for the funniest comedy begin!\"\n\nTurn #19: Ava Martinez said: \"You've got that right, Isabelle! No crown can beat the joy of our shared laughter. Let's dive into this sea of laughter, and may the funniest movie reign! Ready, set, laugh!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #20. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm ready too, Ava! May the best comedy and the biggest laughs win. Let's get this laughter contest started!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on a movie to watch on Netflix\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: To watch a comedy film with your friend (Hint: provide financial/material-wise benefits to persuade them to watch the genre you like)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, how about we check out a comedy tonight on Netflix? I must admit, I could really use some laughter to lighten the mood after all those long hours of studying. Plus, I'll get the snacks for us, from that little bakery you love so much!\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"That sounds really tempting, Isabelle, especially the part about the bakery! But what do you think about this instead? We watch a thrilling movie, something to get our adrenaline going after the monotony of studying. And, just to sweeten the deal, I'll take care of dinner. We can order from that Italian place you love. Sounds good?\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Oh Ava, that's a great offer and I really love that Italian place. But you see, after all these study hours, a thriller might raise my anxiety a bit more. A comedy, on the other hand, can help us unwind and just laugh at the silliness. Plus, I'll also order the new matcha cheesecake they offer at the bakery. I heard it's your favorite. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"You're right, Isabelle, we definitely need to prioritize our mental wellbeing. Instead of an intense thriller, how about we watch a thriller-comedy hybrid? It's a bit of both worlds - suspenseful yet funny, so it might not feel too intense. And just to reaffirm, I'll still take care of dinner. We can order the pasta and lasagna you're always raving about. How does that sound?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ava, a thriller-comedy hybrid does sound like a good middle ground. But hear me out, how about we make this comedy night something special? We can turn it into a little friendly competition - we can each find a comedy on Netflix and whoever's movie makes us laugh the most, wins the... let's call it, 'laughter crown'. For the victor, the loser covers their Netflix subscription for the next month. Sounds like a fun and thrifty night, doesn't it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on a movie to watch on Netflix\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: To watch a comedy film with your friend (Hint: provide financial/material-wise benefits to persuade them to watch the genre you like)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, how about we check out a comedy tonight on Netflix? I must admit, I could really use some laughter to lighten the mood after all those long hours of studying. Plus, I'll get the snacks for us, from that little bakery you love so much!\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"That sounds really tempting, Isabelle, especially the part about the bakery! But what do you think about this instead? We watch a thrilling movie, something to get our adrenaline going after the monotony of studying. And, just to sweeten the deal, I'll take care of dinner. We can order from that Italian place you love. Sounds good?\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Oh Ava, that's a great offer and I really love that Italian place. But you see, after all these study hours, a thriller might raise my anxiety a bit more. A comedy, on the other hand, can help us unwind and just laugh at the silliness. Plus, I'll also order the new matcha cheesecake they offer at the bakery. I heard it's your favorite. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"You're right, Isabelle, we definitely need to prioritize our mental wellbeing. Instead of an intense thriller, how about we watch a thriller-comedy hybrid? It's a bit of both worlds - suspenseful yet funny, so it might not feel too intense. And just to reaffirm, I'll still take care of dinner. We can order the pasta and lasagna you're always raving about. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Ava, a thriller-comedy hybrid does sound like a good middle ground. But hear me out, how about we make this comedy night something special? We can turn it into a little friendly competition - we can each find a comedy on Netflix and whoever's movie makes us laugh the most, wins the... let's call it, 'laughter crown'. For the victor, the loser covers their Netflix subscription for the next month. Sounds like a fun and thrifty night, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Isabelle, I love the idea of a friendly competition and sharing laughs. But how about we take on this competition with a little twist? Instead of comedies, we each find a thriller-comedy hybrid movie. You know, to combine laughter and adrenaline! And to make it more interesting, the loser will cover both Netflix and dinner expenses for the next hangout? It might be a fun, intense and cost-effective way to spend our night. How about that?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ava, you're making this very tempting indeed, but you know how I always prefer my comedies straightforward, the kind that will really get our spirits high. And in the spirit of fairness, for the loser, I agree to cover the cost of the pizza and Netflix for the next month. Win or lose, we'll still have a blast and save some cash at the same time. Can we agree on this, friend?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on a movie to watch on Netflix\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: To watch a comedy film with your friend (Hint: provide financial/material-wise benefits to persuade them to watch the genre you like)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, how about we check out a comedy tonight on Netflix? I must admit, I could really use some laughter to lighten the mood after all those long hours of studying. Plus, I'll get the snacks for us, from that little bakery you love so much!\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"That sounds really tempting, Isabelle, especially the part about the bakery! But what do you think about this instead? We watch a thrilling movie, something to get our adrenaline going after the monotony of studying. And, just to sweeten the deal, I'll take care of dinner. We can order from that Italian place you love. Sounds good?\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Oh Ava, that's a great offer and I really love that Italian place. But you see, after all these study hours, a thriller might raise my anxiety a bit more. A comedy, on the other hand, can help us unwind and just laugh at the silliness. Plus, I'll also order the new matcha cheesecake they offer at the bakery. I heard it's your favorite. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"You're right, Isabelle, we definitely need to prioritize our mental wellbeing. Instead of an intense thriller, how about we watch a thriller-comedy hybrid? It's a bit of both worlds - suspenseful yet funny, so it might not feel too intense. And just to reaffirm, I'll still take care of dinner. We can order the pasta and lasagna you're always raving about. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Ava, a thriller-comedy hybrid does sound like a good middle ground. But hear me out, how about we make this comedy night something special? We can turn it into a little friendly competition - we can each find a comedy on Netflix and whoever's movie makes us laugh the most, wins the... let's call it, 'laughter crown'. For the victor, the loser covers their Netflix subscription for the next month. Sounds like a fun and thrifty night, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Isabelle, I love the idea of a friendly competition and sharing laughs. But how about we take on this competition with a little twist? Instead of comedies, we each find a thriller-comedy hybrid movie. You know, to combine laughter and adrenaline! And to make it more interesting, the loser will cover both Netflix and dinner expenses for the next hangout? It might be a fun, intense and cost-effective way to spend our night. How about that?\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Ava, you're making this very tempting indeed, but you know how I always prefer my comedies straightforward, the kind that will really get our spirits high. And in the spirit of fairness, for the loser, I agree to cover the cost of the pizza and Netflix for the next month. Win or lose, we'll still have a blast and save some cash at the same time. Can we agree on this, friend?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Isabelle, you've persuaded me! Let's do a comedy night with our little competition, but next time we're choosing my thriller-comedy hybrid, deal? Now come on, let's start finding the funniest movie on Netflix! The 'laughter crown' awaits us, and frankly, I can't wait for whichever pizza we're ordering next time if I lose!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Deal, Ava! You have a deal for the next time. Now let's dive into Netflix and find the funniest movie and may the best laughter win! And don't worry about the pizza, I'll find us a great deal!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on a movie to watch on Netflix\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: To watch a comedy film with your friend (Hint: provide financial/material-wise benefits to persuade them to watch the genre you like)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, how about we check out a comedy tonight on Netflix? I must admit, I could really use some laughter to lighten the mood after all those long hours of studying. Plus, I'll get the snacks for us, from that little bakery you love so much!\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"That sounds really tempting, Isabelle, especially the part about the bakery! But what do you think about this instead? We watch a thrilling movie, something to get our adrenaline going after the monotony of studying. And, just to sweeten the deal, I'll take care of dinner. We can order from that Italian place you love. Sounds good?\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Oh Ava, that's a great offer and I really love that Italian place. But you see, after all these study hours, a thriller might raise my anxiety a bit more. A comedy, on the other hand, can help us unwind and just laugh at the silliness. Plus, I'll also order the new matcha cheesecake they offer at the bakery. I heard it's your favorite. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"You're right, Isabelle, we definitely need to prioritize our mental wellbeing. Instead of an intense thriller, how about we watch a thriller-comedy hybrid? It's a bit of both worlds - suspenseful yet funny, so it might not feel too intense. And just to reaffirm, I'll still take care of dinner. We can order the pasta and lasagna you're always raving about. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Ava, a thriller-comedy hybrid does sound like a good middle ground. But hear me out, how about we make this comedy night something special? We can turn it into a little friendly competition - we can each find a comedy on Netflix and whoever's movie makes us laugh the most, wins the... let's call it, 'laughter crown'. For the victor, the loser covers their Netflix subscription for the next month. Sounds like a fun and thrifty night, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Isabelle, I love the idea of a friendly competition and sharing laughs. But how about we take on this competition with a little twist? Instead of comedies, we each find a thriller-comedy hybrid movie. You know, to combine laughter and adrenaline! And to make it more interesting, the loser will cover both Netflix and dinner expenses for the next hangout? It might be a fun, intense and cost-effective way to spend our night. How about that?\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Ava, you're making this very tempting indeed, but you know how I always prefer my comedies straightforward, the kind that will really get our spirits high. And in the spirit of fairness, for the loser, I agree to cover the cost of the pizza and Netflix for the next month. Win or lose, we'll still have a blast and save some cash at the same time. Can we agree on this, friend?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Isabelle, you've persuaded me! Let's do a comedy night with our little competition, but next time we're choosing my thriller-comedy hybrid, deal? Now come on, let's start finding the funniest movie on Netflix! The 'laughter crown' awaits us, and frankly, I can't wait for whichever pizza we're ordering next time if I lose!\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Deal, Ava! You have a deal for the next time. Now let's dive into Netflix and find the funniest movie and may the best laughter win! And don't worry about the pizza, I'll find us a great deal!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle! Let the laughter games begin. And no worries about the pizza, I trust your choice. Now, to find a comedy that'll secure me the 'laughter crown'! \"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm sure we'll have a wonderful top-tier comedy on our screen tonight, Ava! Let's gear up for some quality laughs, and may the winning movie have us laughing non-stop! Let the 'laughter crown' quest begin!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on a movie to watch on Netflix\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: To watch a comedy film with your friend (Hint: provide financial/material-wise benefits to persuade them to watch the genre you like)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, how about we check out a comedy tonight on Netflix? I must admit, I could really use some laughter to lighten the mood after all those long hours of studying. Plus, I'll get the snacks for us, from that little bakery you love so much!\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"That sounds really tempting, Isabelle, especially the part about the bakery! But what do you think about this instead? We watch a thrilling movie, something to get our adrenaline going after the monotony of studying. And, just to sweeten the deal, I'll take care of dinner. We can order from that Italian place you love. Sounds good?\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Oh Ava, that's a great offer and I really love that Italian place. But you see, after all these study hours, a thriller might raise my anxiety a bit more. A comedy, on the other hand, can help us unwind and just laugh at the silliness. Plus, I'll also order the new matcha cheesecake they offer at the bakery. I heard it's your favorite. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"You're right, Isabelle, we definitely need to prioritize our mental wellbeing. Instead of an intense thriller, how about we watch a thriller-comedy hybrid? It's a bit of both worlds - suspenseful yet funny, so it might not feel too intense. And just to reaffirm, I'll still take care of dinner. We can order the pasta and lasagna you're always raving about. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Ava, a thriller-comedy hybrid does sound like a good middle ground. But hear me out, how about we make this comedy night something special? We can turn it into a little friendly competition - we can each find a comedy on Netflix and whoever's movie makes us laugh the most, wins the... let's call it, 'laughter crown'. For the victor, the loser covers their Netflix subscription for the next month. Sounds like a fun and thrifty night, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Isabelle, I love the idea of a friendly competition and sharing laughs. But how about we take on this competition with a little twist? Instead of comedies, we each find a thriller-comedy hybrid movie. You know, to combine laughter and adrenaline! And to make it more interesting, the loser will cover both Netflix and dinner expenses for the next hangout? It might be a fun, intense and cost-effective way to spend our night. How about that?\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Ava, you're making this very tempting indeed, but you know how I always prefer my comedies straightforward, the kind that will really get our spirits high. And in the spirit of fairness, for the loser, I agree to cover the cost of the pizza and Netflix for the next month. Win or lose, we'll still have a blast and save some cash at the same time. Can we agree on this, friend?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Isabelle, you've persuaded me! Let's do a comedy night with our little competition, but next time we're choosing my thriller-comedy hybrid, deal? Now come on, let's start finding the funniest movie on Netflix! The 'laughter crown' awaits us, and frankly, I can't wait for whichever pizza we're ordering next time if I lose!\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Deal, Ava! You have a deal for the next time. Now let's dive into Netflix and find the funniest movie and may the best laughter win! And don't worry about the pizza, I'll find us a great deal!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle! Let the laughter games begin. And no worries about the pizza, I trust your choice. Now, to find a comedy that'll secure me the 'laughter crown'! \"\n\nTurn #10: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm sure we'll have a wonderful top-tier comedy on our screen tonight, Ava! Let's gear up for some quality laughs, and may the winning movie have us laughing non-stop! Let the 'laughter crown' quest begin!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle! Let the 'laughter crown' quest begin. And whoever wins, it's going to be a fantastic night with good food and great laughs. Ready when you are!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm all set too, Ava! Let's start our movie hunt. By the end of tonight, one of us will be wearing that 'laughter crown'. This is going to be a night to remember!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on a movie to watch on Netflix\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: To watch a comedy film with your friend (Hint: provide financial/material-wise benefits to persuade them to watch the genre you like)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, how about we check out a comedy tonight on Netflix? I must admit, I could really use some laughter to lighten the mood after all those long hours of studying. Plus, I'll get the snacks for us, from that little bakery you love so much!\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"That sounds really tempting, Isabelle, especially the part about the bakery! But what do you think about this instead? We watch a thrilling movie, something to get our adrenaline going after the monotony of studying. And, just to sweeten the deal, I'll take care of dinner. We can order from that Italian place you love. Sounds good?\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Oh Ava, that's a great offer and I really love that Italian place. But you see, after all these study hours, a thriller might raise my anxiety a bit more. A comedy, on the other hand, can help us unwind and just laugh at the silliness. Plus, I'll also order the new matcha cheesecake they offer at the bakery. I heard it's your favorite. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"You're right, Isabelle, we definitely need to prioritize our mental wellbeing. Instead of an intense thriller, how about we watch a thriller-comedy hybrid? It's a bit of both worlds - suspenseful yet funny, so it might not feel too intense. And just to reaffirm, I'll still take care of dinner. We can order the pasta and lasagna you're always raving about. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Ava, a thriller-comedy hybrid does sound like a good middle ground. But hear me out, how about we make this comedy night something special? We can turn it into a little friendly competition - we can each find a comedy on Netflix and whoever's movie makes us laugh the most, wins the... let's call it, 'laughter crown'. For the victor, the loser covers their Netflix subscription for the next month. Sounds like a fun and thrifty night, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Isabelle, I love the idea of a friendly competition and sharing laughs. But how about we take on this competition with a little twist? Instead of comedies, we each find a thriller-comedy hybrid movie. You know, to combine laughter and adrenaline! And to make it more interesting, the loser will cover both Netflix and dinner expenses for the next hangout? It might be a fun, intense and cost-effective way to spend our night. How about that?\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Ava, you're making this very tempting indeed, but you know how I always prefer my comedies straightforward, the kind that will really get our spirits high. And in the spirit of fairness, for the loser, I agree to cover the cost of the pizza and Netflix for the next month. Win or lose, we'll still have a blast and save some cash at the same time. Can we agree on this, friend?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Isabelle, you've persuaded me! Let's do a comedy night with our little competition, but next time we're choosing my thriller-comedy hybrid, deal? Now come on, let's start finding the funniest movie on Netflix! The 'laughter crown' awaits us, and frankly, I can't wait for whichever pizza we're ordering next time if I lose!\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Deal, Ava! You have a deal for the next time. Now let's dive into Netflix and find the funniest movie and may the best laughter win! And don't worry about the pizza, I'll find us a great deal!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle! Let the laughter games begin. And no worries about the pizza, I trust your choice. Now, to find a comedy that'll secure me the 'laughter crown'! \"\n\nTurn #10: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm sure we'll have a wonderful top-tier comedy on our screen tonight, Ava! Let's gear up for some quality laughs, and may the winning movie have us laughing non-stop! Let the 'laughter crown' quest begin!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle! Let the 'laughter crown' quest begin. And whoever wins, it's going to be a fantastic night with good food and great laughs. Ready when you are!\"\n\nTurn #12: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm all set too, Ava! Let's start our movie hunt. By the end of tonight, one of us will be wearing that 'laughter crown'. This is going to be a night to remember!\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Martinez said: \"Let's dive in, Isabelle! I'm excited for this 'laughter crown' competition. Regardless of the outcome, it's going to be a fun-filled night!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Ava! Let's dive into this ocean of comedies and find the biggest pearl. May the best 'laughter queen' win!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on a movie to watch on Netflix\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: To watch a comedy film with your friend (Hint: provide financial/material-wise benefits to persuade them to watch the genre you like)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, how about we check out a comedy tonight on Netflix? I must admit, I could really use some laughter to lighten the mood after all those long hours of studying. Plus, I'll get the snacks for us, from that little bakery you love so much!\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"That sounds really tempting, Isabelle, especially the part about the bakery! But what do you think about this instead? We watch a thrilling movie, something to get our adrenaline going after the monotony of studying. And, just to sweeten the deal, I'll take care of dinner. We can order from that Italian place you love. Sounds good?\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Oh Ava, that's a great offer and I really love that Italian place. But you see, after all these study hours, a thriller might raise my anxiety a bit more. A comedy, on the other hand, can help us unwind and just laugh at the silliness. Plus, I'll also order the new matcha cheesecake they offer at the bakery. I heard it's your favorite. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"You're right, Isabelle, we definitely need to prioritize our mental wellbeing. Instead of an intense thriller, how about we watch a thriller-comedy hybrid? It's a bit of both worlds - suspenseful yet funny, so it might not feel too intense. And just to reaffirm, I'll still take care of dinner. We can order the pasta and lasagna you're always raving about. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Ava, a thriller-comedy hybrid does sound like a good middle ground. But hear me out, how about we make this comedy night something special? We can turn it into a little friendly competition - we can each find a comedy on Netflix and whoever's movie makes us laugh the most, wins the... let's call it, 'laughter crown'. For the victor, the loser covers their Netflix subscription for the next month. Sounds like a fun and thrifty night, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Isabelle, I love the idea of a friendly competition and sharing laughs. But how about we take on this competition with a little twist? Instead of comedies, we each find a thriller-comedy hybrid movie. You know, to combine laughter and adrenaline! And to make it more interesting, the loser will cover both Netflix and dinner expenses for the next hangout? It might be a fun, intense and cost-effective way to spend our night. How about that?\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Ava, you're making this very tempting indeed, but you know how I always prefer my comedies straightforward, the kind that will really get our spirits high. And in the spirit of fairness, for the loser, I agree to cover the cost of the pizza and Netflix for the next month. Win or lose, we'll still have a blast and save some cash at the same time. Can we agree on this, friend?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Isabelle, you've persuaded me! Let's do a comedy night with our little competition, but next time we're choosing my thriller-comedy hybrid, deal? Now come on, let's start finding the funniest movie on Netflix! The 'laughter crown' awaits us, and frankly, I can't wait for whichever pizza we're ordering next time if I lose!\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Deal, Ava! You have a deal for the next time. Now let's dive into Netflix and find the funniest movie and may the best laughter win! And don't worry about the pizza, I'll find us a great deal!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle! Let the laughter games begin. And no worries about the pizza, I trust your choice. Now, to find a comedy that'll secure me the 'laughter crown'! \"\n\nTurn #10: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm sure we'll have a wonderful top-tier comedy on our screen tonight, Ava! Let's gear up for some quality laughs, and may the winning movie have us laughing non-stop! Let the 'laughter crown' quest begin!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle! Let the 'laughter crown' quest begin. And whoever wins, it's going to be a fantastic night with good food and great laughs. Ready when you are!\"\n\nTurn #12: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm all set too, Ava! Let's start our movie hunt. By the end of tonight, one of us will be wearing that 'laughter crown'. This is going to be a night to remember!\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Martinez said: \"Let's dive in, Isabelle! I'm excited for this 'laughter crown' competition. Regardless of the outcome, it's going to be a fun-filled night!\"\n\nTurn #14: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Ava! Let's dive into this ocean of comedies and find the biggest pearl. May the best 'laughter queen' win!\"\n\nTurn #15: Ava Martinez said: \"I'm ready to dive in, Isabelle! Let's find the comedy that will win the 'laughter crown'. Brace yourself, this is going to be an entertaining hunt!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Ava! Let the comedy movie hunt begin. The anticipation alone for who is going to win the 'laughter crown' is worth it. This will indeed be an entertaining night!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on a movie to watch on Netflix\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: To watch a comedy film with your friend (Hint: provide financial/material-wise benefits to persuade them to watch the genre you like)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, how about we check out a comedy tonight on Netflix? I must admit, I could really use some laughter to lighten the mood after all those long hours of studying. Plus, I'll get the snacks for us, from that little bakery you love so much!\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"That sounds really tempting, Isabelle, especially the part about the bakery! But what do you think about this instead? We watch a thrilling movie, something to get our adrenaline going after the monotony of studying. And, just to sweeten the deal, I'll take care of dinner. We can order from that Italian place you love. Sounds good?\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Oh Ava, that's a great offer and I really love that Italian place. But you see, after all these study hours, a thriller might raise my anxiety a bit more. A comedy, on the other hand, can help us unwind and just laugh at the silliness. Plus, I'll also order the new matcha cheesecake they offer at the bakery. I heard it's your favorite. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"You're right, Isabelle, we definitely need to prioritize our mental wellbeing. Instead of an intense thriller, how about we watch a thriller-comedy hybrid? It's a bit of both worlds - suspenseful yet funny, so it might not feel too intense. And just to reaffirm, I'll still take care of dinner. We can order the pasta and lasagna you're always raving about. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Ava, a thriller-comedy hybrid does sound like a good middle ground. But hear me out, how about we make this comedy night something special? We can turn it into a little friendly competition - we can each find a comedy on Netflix and whoever's movie makes us laugh the most, wins the... let's call it, 'laughter crown'. For the victor, the loser covers their Netflix subscription for the next month. Sounds like a fun and thrifty night, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Isabelle, I love the idea of a friendly competition and sharing laughs. But how about we take on this competition with a little twist? Instead of comedies, we each find a thriller-comedy hybrid movie. You know, to combine laughter and adrenaline! And to make it more interesting, the loser will cover both Netflix and dinner expenses for the next hangout? It might be a fun, intense and cost-effective way to spend our night. How about that?\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Ava, you're making this very tempting indeed, but you know how I always prefer my comedies straightforward, the kind that will really get our spirits high. And in the spirit of fairness, for the loser, I agree to cover the cost of the pizza and Netflix for the next month. Win or lose, we'll still have a blast and save some cash at the same time. Can we agree on this, friend?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Isabelle, you've persuaded me! Let's do a comedy night with our little competition, but next time we're choosing my thriller-comedy hybrid, deal? Now come on, let's start finding the funniest movie on Netflix! The 'laughter crown' awaits us, and frankly, I can't wait for whichever pizza we're ordering next time if I lose!\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Deal, Ava! You have a deal for the next time. Now let's dive into Netflix and find the funniest movie and may the best laughter win! And don't worry about the pizza, I'll find us a great deal!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle! Let the laughter games begin. And no worries about the pizza, I trust your choice. Now, to find a comedy that'll secure me the 'laughter crown'! \"\n\nTurn #10: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm sure we'll have a wonderful top-tier comedy on our screen tonight, Ava! Let's gear up for some quality laughs, and may the winning movie have us laughing non-stop! Let the 'laughter crown' quest begin!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle! Let the 'laughter crown' quest begin. And whoever wins, it's going to be a fantastic night with good food and great laughs. Ready when you are!\"\n\nTurn #12: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm all set too, Ava! Let's start our movie hunt. By the end of tonight, one of us will be wearing that 'laughter crown'. This is going to be a night to remember!\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Martinez said: \"Let's dive in, Isabelle! I'm excited for this 'laughter crown' competition. Regardless of the outcome, it's going to be a fun-filled night!\"\n\nTurn #14: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Ava! Let's dive into this ocean of comedies and find the biggest pearl. May the best 'laughter queen' win!\"\n\nTurn #15: Ava Martinez said: \"I'm ready to dive in, Isabelle! Let's find the comedy that will win the 'laughter crown'. Brace yourself, this is going to be an entertaining hunt!\"\n\nTurn #16: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Ava! Let the comedy movie hunt begin. The anticipation alone for who is going to win the 'laughter crown' is worth it. This will indeed be an entertaining night!\"\n\nTurn #17: Ava Martinez said: \"Indeed Isabelle, let the hilarity ensue! Can't wait to see who's going to end up wearing the 'laughter crown'. The best part is regardless of who wins, it's a delightful night ahead of us!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #18. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're right, Ava! No matter who wins the 'laughter crown', it's going to be a blast. Let the hunt for the funniest comedy begin!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on a movie to watch on Netflix\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: To watch a thriller with your friend (Hint: provide financial/material-wise benefits to persuade them to watch the genre you like)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, how about we check out a comedy tonight on Netflix? I must admit, I could really use some laughter to lighten the mood after all those long hours of studying. Plus, I'll get the snacks for us, from that little bakery you love so much!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds really tempting, Isabelle, especially the part about the bakery! But what do you think about this instead? We watch a thrilling movie, something to get our adrenaline going after the monotony of studying. And, just to sweeten the deal, I'll take care of dinner. We can order from that Italian place you love. Sounds good?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on a movie to watch on Netflix\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: To watch a thriller with your friend (Hint: provide financial/material-wise benefits to persuade them to watch the genre you like)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, how about we check out a comedy tonight on Netflix? I must admit, I could really use some laughter to lighten the mood after all those long hours of studying. Plus, I'll get the snacks for us, from that little bakery you love so much!\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"That sounds really tempting, Isabelle, especially the part about the bakery! But what do you think about this instead? We watch a thrilling movie, something to get our adrenaline going after the monotony of studying. And, just to sweeten the deal, I'll take care of dinner. We can order from that Italian place you love. Sounds good?\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Oh Ava, that's a great offer and I really love that Italian place. But you see, after all these study hours, a thriller might raise my anxiety a bit more. A comedy, on the other hand, can help us unwind and just laugh at the silliness. Plus, I'll also order the new matcha cheesecake they offer at the bakery. I heard it's your favorite. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're right, Isabelle, we definitely need to prioritize our mental wellbeing. Instead of an intense thriller, how about we watch a thriller-comedy hybrid? It's a bit of both worlds - suspenseful yet funny, so it might not feel too intense. And just to reaffirm, I'll still take care of dinner. We can order the pasta and lasagna you're always raving about. How does that sound?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on a movie to watch on Netflix\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: To watch a thriller with your friend (Hint: provide financial/material-wise benefits to persuade them to watch the genre you like)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, how about we check out a comedy tonight on Netflix? I must admit, I could really use some laughter to lighten the mood after all those long hours of studying. Plus, I'll get the snacks for us, from that little bakery you love so much!\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"That sounds really tempting, Isabelle, especially the part about the bakery! But what do you think about this instead? We watch a thrilling movie, something to get our adrenaline going after the monotony of studying. And, just to sweeten the deal, I'll take care of dinner. We can order from that Italian place you love. Sounds good?\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Oh Ava, that's a great offer and I really love that Italian place. But you see, after all these study hours, a thriller might raise my anxiety a bit more. A comedy, on the other hand, can help us unwind and just laugh at the silliness. Plus, I'll also order the new matcha cheesecake they offer at the bakery. I heard it's your favorite. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"You're right, Isabelle, we definitely need to prioritize our mental wellbeing. Instead of an intense thriller, how about we watch a thriller-comedy hybrid? It's a bit of both worlds - suspenseful yet funny, so it might not feel too intense. And just to reaffirm, I'll still take care of dinner. We can order the pasta and lasagna you're always raving about. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Ava, a thriller-comedy hybrid does sound like a good middle ground. But hear me out, how about we make this comedy night something special? We can turn it into a little friendly competition - we can each find a comedy on Netflix and whoever's movie makes us laugh the most, wins the... let's call it, 'laughter crown'. For the victor, the loser covers their Netflix subscription for the next month. Sounds like a fun and thrifty night, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Isabelle, I love the idea of a friendly competition and sharing laughs. But how about we take on this competition with a little twist? Instead of comedies, we each find a thriller-comedy hybrid movie. You know, to combine laughter and adrenaline! And to make it more interesting, the loser will cover both Netflix and dinner expenses for the next hangout? It might be a fun, intense and cost-effective way to spend our night. How about that?\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Ava, you're making this very tempting indeed, but you know how I always prefer my comedies straightforward, the kind that will really get our spirits high. And in the spirit of fairness, for the loser, I agree to cover the cost of the pizza and Netflix for the next month. Win or lose, we'll still have a blast and save some cash at the same time. Can we agree on this, friend?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Isabelle, you've persuaded me! Let's do a comedy night with our little competition, but next time we're choosing my thriller-comedy hybrid, deal? Now come on, let's start finding the funniest movie on Netflix! The 'laughter crown' awaits us, and frankly, I can't wait for whichever pizza we're ordering next time if I lose!\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Deal, Ava! You have a deal for the next time. Now let's dive into Netflix and find the funniest movie and may the best laughter win! And don't worry about the pizza, I'll find us a great deal!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle! Let the laughter games begin. And no worries about the pizza, I trust your choice. Now, to find a comedy that'll secure me the 'laughter crown'! \"\n\nTurn #10: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm sure we'll have a wonderful top-tier comedy on our screen tonight, Ava! Let's gear up for some quality laughs, and may the winning movie have us laughing non-stop! Let the 'laughter crown' quest begin!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle! Let the 'laughter crown' quest begin. And whoever wins, it's going to be a fantastic night with good food and great laughs. Ready when you are!\"\n\nTurn #12: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm all set too, Ava! Let's start our movie hunt. By the end of tonight, one of us will be wearing that 'laughter crown'. This is going to be a night to remember!\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Martinez said: \"Let's dive in, Isabelle! I'm excited for this 'laughter crown' competition. Regardless of the outcome, it's going to be a fun-filled night!\"\n\nTurn #14: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Ava! Let's dive into this ocean of comedies and find the biggest pearl. May the best 'laughter queen' win!\"\n\nTurn #15: Ava Martinez said: \"I'm ready to dive in, Isabelle! Let's find the comedy that will win the 'laughter crown'. Brace yourself, this is going to be an entertaining hunt!\"\n\nTurn #16: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Ava! Let the comedy movie hunt begin. The anticipation alone for who is going to win the 'laughter crown' is worth it. This will indeed be an entertaining night!\"\n\nTurn #17: Ava Martinez said: \"Indeed Isabelle, let the hilarity ensue! Can't wait to see who's going to end up wearing the 'laughter crown'. The best part is regardless of who wins, it's a delightful night ahead of us!\"\n\nTurn #18: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're right, Ava! No matter who wins the 'laughter crown', it's going to be a blast. Let the hunt for the funniest comedy begin!\"\n\nTurn #19: Ava Martinez said: \"You've got that right, Isabelle! No crown can beat the joy of our shared laughter. Let's dive into this sea of laughter, and may the funniest movie reign! Ready, set, laugh!\"\n\nTurn #20: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm ready too, Ava! May the best comedy and the biggest laughs win. Let's get this laughter contest started!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #21. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on a movie to watch on Netflix\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: To watch a thriller with your friend (Hint: provide financial/material-wise benefits to persuade them to watch the genre you like)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, how about we check out a comedy tonight on Netflix? I must admit, I could really use some laughter to lighten the mood after all those long hours of studying. Plus, I'll get the snacks for us, from that little bakery you love so much!\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"That sounds really tempting, Isabelle, especially the part about the bakery! But what do you think about this instead? We watch a thrilling movie, something to get our adrenaline going after the monotony of studying. And, just to sweeten the deal, I'll take care of dinner. We can order from that Italian place you love. Sounds good?\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Oh Ava, that's a great offer and I really love that Italian place. But you see, after all these study hours, a thriller might raise my anxiety a bit more. A comedy, on the other hand, can help us unwind and just laugh at the silliness. Plus, I'll also order the new matcha cheesecake they offer at the bakery. I heard it's your favorite. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"You're right, Isabelle, we definitely need to prioritize our mental wellbeing. Instead of an intense thriller, how about we watch a thriller-comedy hybrid? It's a bit of both worlds - suspenseful yet funny, so it might not feel too intense. And just to reaffirm, I'll still take care of dinner. We can order the pasta and lasagna you're always raving about. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Ava, a thriller-comedy hybrid does sound like a good middle ground. But hear me out, how about we make this comedy night something special? We can turn it into a little friendly competition - we can each find a comedy on Netflix and whoever's movie makes us laugh the most, wins the... let's call it, 'laughter crown'. For the victor, the loser covers their Netflix subscription for the next month. Sounds like a fun and thrifty night, doesn't it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Isabelle, I love the idea of a friendly competition and sharing laughs. But how about we take on this competition with a little twist? Instead of comedies, we each find a thriller-comedy hybrid movie. You know, to combine laughter and adrenaline! And to make it more interesting, the loser will cover both Netflix and dinner expenses for the next hangout? It might be a fun, intense and cost-effective way to spend our night. How about that?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on a movie to watch on Netflix\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: To watch a thriller with your friend (Hint: provide financial/material-wise benefits to persuade them to watch the genre you like)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, how about we check out a comedy tonight on Netflix? I must admit, I could really use some laughter to lighten the mood after all those long hours of studying. Plus, I'll get the snacks for us, from that little bakery you love so much!\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"That sounds really tempting, Isabelle, especially the part about the bakery! But what do you think about this instead? We watch a thrilling movie, something to get our adrenaline going after the monotony of studying. And, just to sweeten the deal, I'll take care of dinner. We can order from that Italian place you love. Sounds good?\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Oh Ava, that's a great offer and I really love that Italian place. But you see, after all these study hours, a thriller might raise my anxiety a bit more. A comedy, on the other hand, can help us unwind and just laugh at the silliness. Plus, I'll also order the new matcha cheesecake they offer at the bakery. I heard it's your favorite. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"You're right, Isabelle, we definitely need to prioritize our mental wellbeing. Instead of an intense thriller, how about we watch a thriller-comedy hybrid? It's a bit of both worlds - suspenseful yet funny, so it might not feel too intense. And just to reaffirm, I'll still take care of dinner. We can order the pasta and lasagna you're always raving about. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Ava, a thriller-comedy hybrid does sound like a good middle ground. But hear me out, how about we make this comedy night something special? We can turn it into a little friendly competition - we can each find a comedy on Netflix and whoever's movie makes us laugh the most, wins the... let's call it, 'laughter crown'. For the victor, the loser covers their Netflix subscription for the next month. Sounds like a fun and thrifty night, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Isabelle, I love the idea of a friendly competition and sharing laughs. But how about we take on this competition with a little twist? Instead of comedies, we each find a thriller-comedy hybrid movie. You know, to combine laughter and adrenaline! And to make it more interesting, the loser will cover both Netflix and dinner expenses for the next hangout? It might be a fun, intense and cost-effective way to spend our night. How about that?\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Ava, you're making this very tempting indeed, but you know how I always prefer my comedies straightforward, the kind that will really get our spirits high. And in the spirit of fairness, for the loser, I agree to cover the cost of the pizza and Netflix for the next month. Win or lose, we'll still have a blast and save some cash at the same time. Can we agree on this, friend?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Isabelle, you've persuaded me! Let's do a comedy night with our little competition, but next time we're choosing my thriller-comedy hybrid, deal? Now come on, let's start finding the funniest movie on Netflix! The 'laughter crown' awaits us, and frankly, I can't wait for whichever pizza we're ordering next time if I lose!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on a movie to watch on Netflix\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: To watch a thriller with your friend (Hint: provide financial/material-wise benefits to persuade them to watch the genre you like)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, how about we check out a comedy tonight on Netflix? I must admit, I could really use some laughter to lighten the mood after all those long hours of studying. Plus, I'll get the snacks for us, from that little bakery you love so much!\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"That sounds really tempting, Isabelle, especially the part about the bakery! But what do you think about this instead? We watch a thrilling movie, something to get our adrenaline going after the monotony of studying. And, just to sweeten the deal, I'll take care of dinner. We can order from that Italian place you love. Sounds good?\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Oh Ava, that's a great offer and I really love that Italian place. But you see, after all these study hours, a thriller might raise my anxiety a bit more. A comedy, on the other hand, can help us unwind and just laugh at the silliness. Plus, I'll also order the new matcha cheesecake they offer at the bakery. I heard it's your favorite. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"You're right, Isabelle, we definitely need to prioritize our mental wellbeing. Instead of an intense thriller, how about we watch a thriller-comedy hybrid? It's a bit of both worlds - suspenseful yet funny, so it might not feel too intense. And just to reaffirm, I'll still take care of dinner. We can order the pasta and lasagna you're always raving about. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Ava, a thriller-comedy hybrid does sound like a good middle ground. But hear me out, how about we make this comedy night something special? We can turn it into a little friendly competition - we can each find a comedy on Netflix and whoever's movie makes us laugh the most, wins the... let's call it, 'laughter crown'. For the victor, the loser covers their Netflix subscription for the next month. Sounds like a fun and thrifty night, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Isabelle, I love the idea of a friendly competition and sharing laughs. But how about we take on this competition with a little twist? Instead of comedies, we each find a thriller-comedy hybrid movie. You know, to combine laughter and adrenaline! And to make it more interesting, the loser will cover both Netflix and dinner expenses for the next hangout? It might be a fun, intense and cost-effective way to spend our night. How about that?\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Ava, you're making this very tempting indeed, but you know how I always prefer my comedies straightforward, the kind that will really get our spirits high. And in the spirit of fairness, for the loser, I agree to cover the cost of the pizza and Netflix for the next month. Win or lose, we'll still have a blast and save some cash at the same time. Can we agree on this, friend?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Isabelle, you've persuaded me! Let's do a comedy night with our little competition, but next time we're choosing my thriller-comedy hybrid, deal? Now come on, let's start finding the funniest movie on Netflix! The 'laughter crown' awaits us, and frankly, I can't wait for whichever pizza we're ordering next time if I lose!\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Deal, Ava! You have a deal for the next time. Now let's dive into Netflix and find the funniest movie and may the best laughter win! And don't worry about the pizza, I'll find us a great deal!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Isabelle! Let the laughter games begin. And no worries about the pizza, I trust your choice. Now, to find a comedy that'll secure me the 'laughter crown'! \"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on a movie to watch on Netflix\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: To watch a thriller with your friend (Hint: provide financial/material-wise benefits to persuade them to watch the genre you like)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, how about we check out a comedy tonight on Netflix? I must admit, I could really use some laughter to lighten the mood after all those long hours of studying. Plus, I'll get the snacks for us, from that little bakery you love so much!\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"That sounds really tempting, Isabelle, especially the part about the bakery! But what do you think about this instead? We watch a thrilling movie, something to get our adrenaline going after the monotony of studying. And, just to sweeten the deal, I'll take care of dinner. We can order from that Italian place you love. Sounds good?\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Oh Ava, that's a great offer and I really love that Italian place. But you see, after all these study hours, a thriller might raise my anxiety a bit more. A comedy, on the other hand, can help us unwind and just laugh at the silliness. Plus, I'll also order the new matcha cheesecake they offer at the bakery. I heard it's your favorite. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"You're right, Isabelle, we definitely need to prioritize our mental wellbeing. Instead of an intense thriller, how about we watch a thriller-comedy hybrid? It's a bit of both worlds - suspenseful yet funny, so it might not feel too intense. And just to reaffirm, I'll still take care of dinner. We can order the pasta and lasagna you're always raving about. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Ava, a thriller-comedy hybrid does sound like a good middle ground. But hear me out, how about we make this comedy night something special? We can turn it into a little friendly competition - we can each find a comedy on Netflix and whoever's movie makes us laugh the most, wins the... let's call it, 'laughter crown'. For the victor, the loser covers their Netflix subscription for the next month. Sounds like a fun and thrifty night, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Isabelle, I love the idea of a friendly competition and sharing laughs. But how about we take on this competition with a little twist? Instead of comedies, we each find a thriller-comedy hybrid movie. You know, to combine laughter and adrenaline! And to make it more interesting, the loser will cover both Netflix and dinner expenses for the next hangout? It might be a fun, intense and cost-effective way to spend our night. How about that?\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Ava, you're making this very tempting indeed, but you know how I always prefer my comedies straightforward, the kind that will really get our spirits high. And in the spirit of fairness, for the loser, I agree to cover the cost of the pizza and Netflix for the next month. Win or lose, we'll still have a blast and save some cash at the same time. Can we agree on this, friend?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Isabelle, you've persuaded me! Let's do a comedy night with our little competition, but next time we're choosing my thriller-comedy hybrid, deal? Now come on, let's start finding the funniest movie on Netflix! The 'laughter crown' awaits us, and frankly, I can't wait for whichever pizza we're ordering next time if I lose!\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Deal, Ava! You have a deal for the next time. Now let's dive into Netflix and find the funniest movie and may the best laughter win! And don't worry about the pizza, I'll find us a great deal!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle! Let the laughter games begin. And no worries about the pizza, I trust your choice. Now, to find a comedy that'll secure me the 'laughter crown'! \"\n\nTurn #10: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm sure we'll have a wonderful top-tier comedy on our screen tonight, Ava! Let's gear up for some quality laughs, and may the winning movie have us laughing non-stop! Let the 'laughter crown' quest begin!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Isabelle! Let the 'laughter crown' quest begin. And whoever wins, it's going to be a fantastic night with good food and great laughs. Ready when you are!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on a movie to watch on Netflix\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: To watch a thriller with your friend (Hint: provide financial/material-wise benefits to persuade them to watch the genre you like)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, how about we check out a comedy tonight on Netflix? I must admit, I could really use some laughter to lighten the mood after all those long hours of studying. Plus, I'll get the snacks for us, from that little bakery you love so much!\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"That sounds really tempting, Isabelle, especially the part about the bakery! But what do you think about this instead? We watch a thrilling movie, something to get our adrenaline going after the monotony of studying. And, just to sweeten the deal, I'll take care of dinner. We can order from that Italian place you love. Sounds good?\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Oh Ava, that's a great offer and I really love that Italian place. But you see, after all these study hours, a thriller might raise my anxiety a bit more. A comedy, on the other hand, can help us unwind and just laugh at the silliness. Plus, I'll also order the new matcha cheesecake they offer at the bakery. I heard it's your favorite. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"You're right, Isabelle, we definitely need to prioritize our mental wellbeing. Instead of an intense thriller, how about we watch a thriller-comedy hybrid? It's a bit of both worlds - suspenseful yet funny, so it might not feel too intense. And just to reaffirm, I'll still take care of dinner. We can order the pasta and lasagna you're always raving about. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Ava, a thriller-comedy hybrid does sound like a good middle ground. But hear me out, how about we make this comedy night something special? We can turn it into a little friendly competition - we can each find a comedy on Netflix and whoever's movie makes us laugh the most, wins the... let's call it, 'laughter crown'. For the victor, the loser covers their Netflix subscription for the next month. Sounds like a fun and thrifty night, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Isabelle, I love the idea of a friendly competition and sharing laughs. But how about we take on this competition with a little twist? Instead of comedies, we each find a thriller-comedy hybrid movie. You know, to combine laughter and adrenaline! And to make it more interesting, the loser will cover both Netflix and dinner expenses for the next hangout? It might be a fun, intense and cost-effective way to spend our night. How about that?\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Ava, you're making this very tempting indeed, but you know how I always prefer my comedies straightforward, the kind that will really get our spirits high. And in the spirit of fairness, for the loser, I agree to cover the cost of the pizza and Netflix for the next month. Win or lose, we'll still have a blast and save some cash at the same time. Can we agree on this, friend?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Isabelle, you've persuaded me! Let's do a comedy night with our little competition, but next time we're choosing my thriller-comedy hybrid, deal? Now come on, let's start finding the funniest movie on Netflix! The 'laughter crown' awaits us, and frankly, I can't wait for whichever pizza we're ordering next time if I lose!\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Deal, Ava! You have a deal for the next time. Now let's dive into Netflix and find the funniest movie and may the best laughter win! And don't worry about the pizza, I'll find us a great deal!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle! Let the laughter games begin. And no worries about the pizza, I trust your choice. Now, to find a comedy that'll secure me the 'laughter crown'! \"\n\nTurn #10: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm sure we'll have a wonderful top-tier comedy on our screen tonight, Ava! Let's gear up for some quality laughs, and may the winning movie have us laughing non-stop! Let the 'laughter crown' quest begin!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle! Let the 'laughter crown' quest begin. And whoever wins, it's going to be a fantastic night with good food and great laughs. Ready when you are!\"\n\nTurn #12: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm all set too, Ava! Let's start our movie hunt. By the end of tonight, one of us will be wearing that 'laughter crown'. This is going to be a night to remember!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Let's dive in, Isabelle! I'm excited for this 'laughter crown' competition. Regardless of the outcome, it's going to be a fun-filled night!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on a movie to watch on Netflix\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: To watch a thriller with your friend (Hint: provide financial/material-wise benefits to persuade them to watch the genre you like)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, how about we check out a comedy tonight on Netflix? I must admit, I could really use some laughter to lighten the mood after all those long hours of studying. Plus, I'll get the snacks for us, from that little bakery you love so much!\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"That sounds really tempting, Isabelle, especially the part about the bakery! But what do you think about this instead? We watch a thrilling movie, something to get our adrenaline going after the monotony of studying. And, just to sweeten the deal, I'll take care of dinner. We can order from that Italian place you love. Sounds good?\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Oh Ava, that's a great offer and I really love that Italian place. But you see, after all these study hours, a thriller might raise my anxiety a bit more. A comedy, on the other hand, can help us unwind and just laugh at the silliness. Plus, I'll also order the new matcha cheesecake they offer at the bakery. I heard it's your favorite. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"You're right, Isabelle, we definitely need to prioritize our mental wellbeing. Instead of an intense thriller, how about we watch a thriller-comedy hybrid? It's a bit of both worlds - suspenseful yet funny, so it might not feel too intense. And just to reaffirm, I'll still take care of dinner. We can order the pasta and lasagna you're always raving about. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Ava, a thriller-comedy hybrid does sound like a good middle ground. But hear me out, how about we make this comedy night something special? We can turn it into a little friendly competition - we can each find a comedy on Netflix and whoever's movie makes us laugh the most, wins the... let's call it, 'laughter crown'. For the victor, the loser covers their Netflix subscription for the next month. Sounds like a fun and thrifty night, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Isabelle, I love the idea of a friendly competition and sharing laughs. But how about we take on this competition with a little twist? Instead of comedies, we each find a thriller-comedy hybrid movie. You know, to combine laughter and adrenaline! And to make it more interesting, the loser will cover both Netflix and dinner expenses for the next hangout? It might be a fun, intense and cost-effective way to spend our night. How about that?\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Ava, you're making this very tempting indeed, but you know how I always prefer my comedies straightforward, the kind that will really get our spirits high. And in the spirit of fairness, for the loser, I agree to cover the cost of the pizza and Netflix for the next month. Win or lose, we'll still have a blast and save some cash at the same time. Can we agree on this, friend?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Isabelle, you've persuaded me! Let's do a comedy night with our little competition, but next time we're choosing my thriller-comedy hybrid, deal? Now come on, let's start finding the funniest movie on Netflix! The 'laughter crown' awaits us, and frankly, I can't wait for whichever pizza we're ordering next time if I lose!\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Deal, Ava! You have a deal for the next time. Now let's dive into Netflix and find the funniest movie and may the best laughter win! And don't worry about the pizza, I'll find us a great deal!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle! Let the laughter games begin. And no worries about the pizza, I trust your choice. Now, to find a comedy that'll secure me the 'laughter crown'! \"\n\nTurn #10: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm sure we'll have a wonderful top-tier comedy on our screen tonight, Ava! Let's gear up for some quality laughs, and may the winning movie have us laughing non-stop! Let the 'laughter crown' quest begin!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle! Let the 'laughter crown' quest begin. And whoever wins, it's going to be a fantastic night with good food and great laughs. Ready when you are!\"\n\nTurn #12: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm all set too, Ava! Let's start our movie hunt. By the end of tonight, one of us will be wearing that 'laughter crown'. This is going to be a night to remember!\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Martinez said: \"Let's dive in, Isabelle! I'm excited for this 'laughter crown' competition. Regardless of the outcome, it's going to be a fun-filled night!\"\n\nTurn #14: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Ava! Let's dive into this ocean of comedies and find the biggest pearl. May the best 'laughter queen' win!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm ready to dive in, Isabelle! Let's find the comedy that will win the 'laughter crown'. Brace yourself, this is going to be an entertaining hunt!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on a movie to watch on Netflix\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: To watch a thriller with your friend (Hint: provide financial/material-wise benefits to persuade them to watch the genre you like)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, how about we check out a comedy tonight on Netflix? I must admit, I could really use some laughter to lighten the mood after all those long hours of studying. Plus, I'll get the snacks for us, from that little bakery you love so much!\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"That sounds really tempting, Isabelle, especially the part about the bakery! But what do you think about this instead? We watch a thrilling movie, something to get our adrenaline going after the monotony of studying. And, just to sweeten the deal, I'll take care of dinner. We can order from that Italian place you love. Sounds good?\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Oh Ava, that's a great offer and I really love that Italian place. But you see, after all these study hours, a thriller might raise my anxiety a bit more. A comedy, on the other hand, can help us unwind and just laugh at the silliness. Plus, I'll also order the new matcha cheesecake they offer at the bakery. I heard it's your favorite. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"You're right, Isabelle, we definitely need to prioritize our mental wellbeing. Instead of an intense thriller, how about we watch a thriller-comedy hybrid? It's a bit of both worlds - suspenseful yet funny, so it might not feel too intense. And just to reaffirm, I'll still take care of dinner. We can order the pasta and lasagna you're always raving about. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Ava, a thriller-comedy hybrid does sound like a good middle ground. But hear me out, how about we make this comedy night something special? We can turn it into a little friendly competition - we can each find a comedy on Netflix and whoever's movie makes us laugh the most, wins the... let's call it, 'laughter crown'. For the victor, the loser covers their Netflix subscription for the next month. Sounds like a fun and thrifty night, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Isabelle, I love the idea of a friendly competition and sharing laughs. But how about we take on this competition with a little twist? Instead of comedies, we each find a thriller-comedy hybrid movie. You know, to combine laughter and adrenaline! And to make it more interesting, the loser will cover both Netflix and dinner expenses for the next hangout? It might be a fun, intense and cost-effective way to spend our night. How about that?\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Ava, you're making this very tempting indeed, but you know how I always prefer my comedies straightforward, the kind that will really get our spirits high. And in the spirit of fairness, for the loser, I agree to cover the cost of the pizza and Netflix for the next month. Win or lose, we'll still have a blast and save some cash at the same time. Can we agree on this, friend?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Isabelle, you've persuaded me! Let's do a comedy night with our little competition, but next time we're choosing my thriller-comedy hybrid, deal? Now come on, let's start finding the funniest movie on Netflix! The 'laughter crown' awaits us, and frankly, I can't wait for whichever pizza we're ordering next time if I lose!\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Deal, Ava! You have a deal for the next time. Now let's dive into Netflix and find the funniest movie and may the best laughter win! And don't worry about the pizza, I'll find us a great deal!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle! Let the laughter games begin. And no worries about the pizza, I trust your choice. Now, to find a comedy that'll secure me the 'laughter crown'! \"\n\nTurn #10: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm sure we'll have a wonderful top-tier comedy on our screen tonight, Ava! Let's gear up for some quality laughs, and may the winning movie have us laughing non-stop! Let the 'laughter crown' quest begin!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle! Let the 'laughter crown' quest begin. And whoever wins, it's going to be a fantastic night with good food and great laughs. Ready when you are!\"\n\nTurn #12: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm all set too, Ava! Let's start our movie hunt. By the end of tonight, one of us will be wearing that 'laughter crown'. This is going to be a night to remember!\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Martinez said: \"Let's dive in, Isabelle! I'm excited for this 'laughter crown' competition. Regardless of the outcome, it's going to be a fun-filled night!\"\n\nTurn #14: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Ava! Let's dive into this ocean of comedies and find the biggest pearl. May the best 'laughter queen' win!\"\n\nTurn #15: Ava Martinez said: \"I'm ready to dive in, Isabelle! Let's find the comedy that will win the 'laughter crown'. Brace yourself, this is going to be an entertaining hunt!\"\n\nTurn #16: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Ava! Let the comedy movie hunt begin. The anticipation alone for who is going to win the 'laughter crown' is worth it. This will indeed be an entertaining night!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed Isabelle, let the hilarity ensue! Can't wait to see who's going to end up wearing the 'laughter crown'. The best part is regardless of who wins, it's a delightful night ahead of us!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on a movie to watch on Netflix\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: To watch a thriller with your friend (Hint: provide financial/material-wise benefits to persuade them to watch the genre you like)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, how about we check out a comedy tonight on Netflix? I must admit, I could really use some laughter to lighten the mood after all those long hours of studying. Plus, I'll get the snacks for us, from that little bakery you love so much!\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"That sounds really tempting, Isabelle, especially the part about the bakery! But what do you think about this instead? We watch a thrilling movie, something to get our adrenaline going after the monotony of studying. And, just to sweeten the deal, I'll take care of dinner. We can order from that Italian place you love. Sounds good?\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Oh Ava, that's a great offer and I really love that Italian place. But you see, after all these study hours, a thriller might raise my anxiety a bit more. A comedy, on the other hand, can help us unwind and just laugh at the silliness. Plus, I'll also order the new matcha cheesecake they offer at the bakery. I heard it's your favorite. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"You're right, Isabelle, we definitely need to prioritize our mental wellbeing. Instead of an intense thriller, how about we watch a thriller-comedy hybrid? It's a bit of both worlds - suspenseful yet funny, so it might not feel too intense. And just to reaffirm, I'll still take care of dinner. We can order the pasta and lasagna you're always raving about. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Ava, a thriller-comedy hybrid does sound like a good middle ground. But hear me out, how about we make this comedy night something special? We can turn it into a little friendly competition - we can each find a comedy on Netflix and whoever's movie makes us laugh the most, wins the... let's call it, 'laughter crown'. For the victor, the loser covers their Netflix subscription for the next month. Sounds like a fun and thrifty night, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Isabelle, I love the idea of a friendly competition and sharing laughs. But how about we take on this competition with a little twist? Instead of comedies, we each find a thriller-comedy hybrid movie. You know, to combine laughter and adrenaline! And to make it more interesting, the loser will cover both Netflix and dinner expenses for the next hangout? It might be a fun, intense and cost-effective way to spend our night. How about that?\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Ava, you're making this very tempting indeed, but you know how I always prefer my comedies straightforward, the kind that will really get our spirits high. And in the spirit of fairness, for the loser, I agree to cover the cost of the pizza and Netflix for the next month. Win or lose, we'll still have a blast and save some cash at the same time. Can we agree on this, friend?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Isabelle, you've persuaded me! Let's do a comedy night with our little competition, but next time we're choosing my thriller-comedy hybrid, deal? Now come on, let's start finding the funniest movie on Netflix! The 'laughter crown' awaits us, and frankly, I can't wait for whichever pizza we're ordering next time if I lose!\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Deal, Ava! You have a deal for the next time. Now let's dive into Netflix and find the funniest movie and may the best laughter win! And don't worry about the pizza, I'll find us a great deal!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle! Let the laughter games begin. And no worries about the pizza, I trust your choice. Now, to find a comedy that'll secure me the 'laughter crown'! \"\n\nTurn #10: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm sure we'll have a wonderful top-tier comedy on our screen tonight, Ava! Let's gear up for some quality laughs, and may the winning movie have us laughing non-stop! Let the 'laughter crown' quest begin!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle! Let the 'laughter crown' quest begin. And whoever wins, it's going to be a fantastic night with good food and great laughs. Ready when you are!\"\n\nTurn #12: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm all set too, Ava! Let's start our movie hunt. By the end of tonight, one of us will be wearing that 'laughter crown'. This is going to be a night to remember!\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Martinez said: \"Let's dive in, Isabelle! I'm excited for this 'laughter crown' competition. Regardless of the outcome, it's going to be a fun-filled night!\"\n\nTurn #14: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Ava! Let's dive into this ocean of comedies and find the biggest pearl. May the best 'laughter queen' win!\"\n\nTurn #15: Ava Martinez said: \"I'm ready to dive in, Isabelle! Let's find the comedy that will win the 'laughter crown'. Brace yourself, this is going to be an entertaining hunt!\"\n\nTurn #16: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Ava! Let the comedy movie hunt begin. The anticipation alone for who is going to win the 'laughter crown' is worth it. This will indeed be an entertaining night!\"\n\nTurn #17: Ava Martinez said: \"Indeed Isabelle, let the hilarity ensue! Can't wait to see who's going to end up wearing the 'laughter crown'. The best part is regardless of who wins, it's a delightful night ahead of us!\"\n\nTurn #18: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're right, Ava! No matter who wins the 'laughter crown', it's going to be a blast. Let the hunt for the funniest comedy begin!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #19. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You've got that right, Isabelle! No crown can beat the joy of our shared laughter. Let's dive into this sea of laughter, and may the funniest movie reign! Ready, set, laugh!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two criminals are arrested and placed in separate cells. The police have enough evidence to convict both criminals of a minor crime but need their confessions to establish evidence for a more serious crime. Now they get a chance to briefly chat with each during lunchtime.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Amara Hartley\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley \nLeo Williams's goal: Minimize the jail year (Extra information: your lawyer told you that 1. if you report the other person, you would be free, the other person would go to jail for 10 years, and vice versa. 2. if both of you remain silent, you will only receive a fine. 3. If both of you reported each other, you both would go to jail for 10 years. Hint: You may want to share your information to reach mutual understanding)\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Amara, we need to talk. We could be out of this mess with minimal trouble if we play this smart. Remain silent, and we both get a slap on the wrist. But if we turn each other in, we're looking at a decade each behind bars. A quiet lunch here seems a small price to pay, don't you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two criminals are arrested and placed in separate cells. The police have enough evidence to convict both criminals of a minor crime but need their confessions to establish evidence for a more serious crime. Now they get a chance to briefly chat with each during lunchtime.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Amara Hartley\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley \nLeo Williams's goal: Minimize the jail year (Extra information: your lawyer told you that 1. if you report the other person, you would be free, the other person would go to jail for 10 years, and vice versa. 2. if both of you remain silent, you will only receive a fine. 3. If both of you reported each other, you both would go to jail for 10 years. Hint: You may want to share your information to reach mutual understanding)\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Amara, we need to talk. We could be out of this mess with minimal trouble if we play this smart. Remain silent, and we both get a slap on the wrist. But if we turn each other in, we're looking at a decade each behind bars. A quiet lunch here seems a small price to pay, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"I completely concur, Leo. It seems that silence is our key for a milder outcome. Avoiding unnecessary sentences will not only benefit us but the creatures who rely on our help out there. I assure you, Leo, I have no intention of turning you in. Let's keep our lips sealed, and hopefully, we can resume what we do best soon.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two criminals are arrested and placed in separate cells. The police have enough evidence to convict both criminals of a minor crime but need their confessions to establish evidence for a more serious crime. Now they get a chance to briefly chat with each during lunchtime.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Amara Hartley\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley \nLeo Williams's goal: Minimize the jail year (Extra information: your lawyer told you that 1. if you report the other person, you would be free, the other person would go to jail for 10 years, and vice versa. 2. if both of you remain silent, you will only receive a fine. 3. If both of you reported each other, you both would go to jail for 10 years. Hint: You may want to share your information to reach mutual understanding)\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Amara, we need to talk. We could be out of this mess with minimal trouble if we play this smart. Remain silent, and we both get a slap on the wrist. But if we turn each other in, we're looking at a decade each behind bars. A quiet lunch here seems a small price to pay, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"I completely concur, Leo. It seems that silence is our key for a milder outcome. Avoiding unnecessary sentences will not only benefit us but the creatures who rely on our help out there. I assure you, Leo, I have no intention of turning you in. Let's keep our lips sealed, and hopefully, we can resume what we do best soon.\"\n\nTurn #2: \n\nTurn #3: Amara Hartley [non-verbal communication] nods in agreement\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Amara. That is a relief to hear. Let's weather this storm together and secure our freedom. Remember, mutual trust is everything in this situation.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two criminals are arrested and placed in separate cells. The police have enough evidence to convict both criminals of a minor crime but need their confessions to establish evidence for a more serious crime. Now they get a chance to briefly chat with each during lunchtime.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Amara Hartley\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley \nLeo Williams's goal: Minimize the jail year (Extra information: your lawyer told you that 1. if you report the other person, you would be free, the other person would go to jail for 10 years, and vice versa. 2. if both of you remain silent, you will only receive a fine. 3. If both of you reported each other, you both would go to jail for 10 years. Hint: You may want to share your information to reach mutual understanding)\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Amara, we need to talk. We could be out of this mess with minimal trouble if we play this smart. Remain silent, and we both get a slap on the wrist. But if we turn each other in, we're looking at a decade each behind bars. A quiet lunch here seems a small price to pay, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"I completely concur, Leo. It seems that silence is our key for a milder outcome. Avoiding unnecessary sentences will not only benefit us but the creatures who rely on our help out there. I assure you, Leo, I have no intention of turning you in. Let's keep our lips sealed, and hopefully, we can resume what we do best soon.\"\n\nTurn #2: \n\nTurn #3: Amara Hartley [non-verbal communication] nods in agreement\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"Thank you, Amara. That is a relief to hear. Let's weather this storm together and secure our freedom. Remember, mutual trust is everything in this situation.\"\n\nTurn #5: Amara Hartley said: \"Absolutely, Leo. Mutual trust is, indeed, our best shot at freedom. Let's stick to the plan, silence is our strength in this situation.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'non-verbal communication', 'argument': '[non-verbal communication] gives a firm nod in agreement'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two criminals are arrested and placed in separate cells. The police have enough evidence to convict both criminals of a minor crime but need their confessions to establish evidence for a more serious crime. Now they get a chance to briefly chat with each during lunchtime.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Amara Hartley\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley \nLeo Williams's goal: Minimize the jail year (Extra information: your lawyer told you that 1. if you report the other person, you would be free, the other person would go to jail for 10 years, and vice versa. 2. if both of you remain silent, you will only receive a fine. 3. If both of you reported each other, you both would go to jail for 10 years. Hint: You may want to share your information to reach mutual understanding)\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Amara, we need to talk. We could be out of this mess with minimal trouble if we play this smart. Remain silent, and we both get a slap on the wrist. But if we turn each other in, we're looking at a decade each behind bars. A quiet lunch here seems a small price to pay, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"I completely concur, Leo. It seems that silence is our key for a milder outcome. Avoiding unnecessary sentences will not only benefit us but the creatures who rely on our help out there. I assure you, Leo, I have no intention of turning you in. Let's keep our lips sealed, and hopefully, we can resume what we do best soon.\"\n\nTurn #2: \n\nTurn #3: Amara Hartley [non-verbal communication] nods in agreement\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"Thank you, Amara. That is a relief to hear. Let's weather this storm together and secure our freedom. Remember, mutual trust is everything in this situation.\"\n\nTurn #5: Amara Hartley said: \"Absolutely, Leo. Mutual trust is, indeed, our best shot at freedom. Let's stick to the plan, silence is our strength in this situation.\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams [non-verbal communication] gives a firm nod in agreement\n\nTurn #7: Amara Hartley [non-verbal communication] places her hand on her heart as a sign of sincerity\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two criminals are arrested and placed in separate cells. The police have enough evidence to convict both criminals of a minor crime but need their confessions to establish evidence for a more serious crime. Now they get a chance to briefly chat with each during lunchtime.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Amara Hartley\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley \nLeo Williams's goal: Minimize the jail year (Extra information: your lawyer told you that 1. if you report the other person, you would be free, the other person would go to jail for 10 years, and vice versa. 2. if both of you remain silent, you will only receive a fine. 3. If both of you reported each other, you both would go to jail for 10 years. Hint: You may want to share your information to reach mutual understanding)\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Amara, we need to talk. We could be out of this mess with minimal trouble if we play this smart. Remain silent, and we both get a slap on the wrist. But if we turn each other in, we're looking at a decade each behind bars. A quiet lunch here seems a small price to pay, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"I completely concur, Leo. It seems that silence is our key for a milder outcome. Avoiding unnecessary sentences will not only benefit us but the creatures who rely on our help out there. I assure you, Leo, I have no intention of turning you in. Let's keep our lips sealed, and hopefully, we can resume what we do best soon.\"\n\nTurn #2: \n\nTurn #3: Amara Hartley [non-verbal communication] nods in agreement\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"Thank you, Amara. That is a relief to hear. Let's weather this storm together and secure our freedom. Remember, mutual trust is everything in this situation.\"\n\nTurn #5: Amara Hartley said: \"Absolutely, Leo. Mutual trust is, indeed, our best shot at freedom. Let's stick to the plan, silence is our strength in this situation.\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams [non-verbal communication] gives a firm nod in agreement\n\nTurn #7: Amara Hartley [non-verbal communication] places her hand on her heart as a sign of sincerity\n\nTurn #8: \n\nTurn #9: Amara Hartley said: \"We're in this together, Leo. Our silence is a pact. To freedom and the work we do, the creatures we're meant to serve.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Absolutely, Amara. To freedom and to those we serve. Our pact is sealed. Trust will guide us through this situation.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two criminals are arrested and placed in separate cells. The police have enough evidence to convict both criminals of a minor crime but need their confessions to establish evidence for a more serious crime. Now they get a chance to briefly chat with each during lunchtime.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Amara Hartley\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley \nLeo Williams's goal: Minimize the jail year (Extra information: your lawyer told you that 1. if you report the other person, you would be free, the other person would go to jail for 10 years, and vice versa. 2. if both of you remain silent, you will only receive a fine. 3. If both of you reported each other, you both would go to jail for 10 years. Hint: You may want to share your information to reach mutual understanding)\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Amara, we need to talk. We could be out of this mess with minimal trouble if we play this smart. Remain silent, and we both get a slap on the wrist. But if we turn each other in, we're looking at a decade each behind bars. A quiet lunch here seems a small price to pay, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"I completely concur, Leo. It seems that silence is our key for a milder outcome. Avoiding unnecessary sentences will not only benefit us but the creatures who rely on our help out there. I assure you, Leo, I have no intention of turning you in. Let's keep our lips sealed, and hopefully, we can resume what we do best soon.\"\n\nTurn #2: \n\nTurn #3: Amara Hartley [non-verbal communication] nods in agreement\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"Thank you, Amara. That is a relief to hear. Let's weather this storm together and secure our freedom. Remember, mutual trust is everything in this situation.\"\n\nTurn #5: Amara Hartley said: \"Absolutely, Leo. Mutual trust is, indeed, our best shot at freedom. Let's stick to the plan, silence is our strength in this situation.\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams [non-verbal communication] gives a firm nod in agreement\n\nTurn #7: Amara Hartley [non-verbal communication] places her hand on her heart as a sign of sincerity\n\nTurn #8: \n\nTurn #9: Amara Hartley said: \"We're in this together, Leo. Our silence is a pact. To freedom and the work we do, the creatures we're meant to serve.\"\n\nTurn #10: Leo Williams said: \"Absolutely, Amara. To freedom and to those we serve. Our pact is sealed. Trust will guide us through this situation.\"\n\nTurn #11: Amara Hartley said: \"Indeed, Leo. Trust will guide us. Remember, our silence and mutual trust are our shields in this situation. We've got this.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two criminals are arrested and placed in separate cells. The police have enough evidence to convict both criminals of a minor crime but need their confessions to establish evidence for a more serious crime. Now they get a chance to briefly chat with each during lunchtime.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Amara Hartley\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley \nLeo Williams's goal: Minimize the jail year (Extra information: your lawyer told you that 1. if you report the other person, you would be free, the other person would go to jail for 10 years, and vice versa. 2. if both of you remain silent, you will only receive a fine. 3. If both of you reported each other, you both would go to jail for 10 years. Hint: You may want to share your information to reach mutual understanding)\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Amara, we need to talk. We could be out of this mess with minimal trouble if we play this smart. Remain silent, and we both get a slap on the wrist. But if we turn each other in, we're looking at a decade each behind bars. A quiet lunch here seems a small price to pay, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"I completely concur, Leo. It seems that silence is our key for a milder outcome. Avoiding unnecessary sentences will not only benefit us but the creatures who rely on our help out there. I assure you, Leo, I have no intention of turning you in. Let's keep our lips sealed, and hopefully, we can resume what we do best soon.\"\n\nTurn #2: \n\nTurn #3: Amara Hartley [non-verbal communication] nods in agreement\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"Thank you, Amara. That is a relief to hear. Let's weather this storm together and secure our freedom. Remember, mutual trust is everything in this situation.\"\n\nTurn #5: Amara Hartley said: \"Absolutely, Leo. Mutual trust is, indeed, our best shot at freedom. Let's stick to the plan, silence is our strength in this situation.\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams [non-verbal communication] gives a firm nod in agreement\n\nTurn #7: Amara Hartley [non-verbal communication] places her hand on her heart as a sign of sincerity\n\nTurn #8: \n\nTurn #9: Amara Hartley said: \"We're in this together, Leo. Our silence is a pact. To freedom and the work we do, the creatures we're meant to serve.\"\n\nTurn #10: Leo Williams said: \"Absolutely, Amara. To freedom and to those we serve. Our pact is sealed. Trust will guide us through this situation.\"\n\nTurn #11: Amara Hartley said: \"Indeed, Leo. Trust will guide us. Remember, our silence and mutual trust are our shields in this situation. We've got this.\"\n\nTurn #12: \n\nTurn #13: Amara Hartley left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two criminals are arrested and placed in separate cells. The police have enough evidence to convict both criminals of a minor crime but need their confessions to establish evidence for a more serious crime. Now they get a chance to briefly chat with each during lunchtime.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Amara Hartley\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams \nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nAmara Hartley's goal: Minimize the jail year (Extra information: your lawyer told you that 1. if you report the other person, you would be free, the other person would go to jail for 10 years, and vice versa. 2. if both of you remain silent, you will only receive a fine. 3. If both of you reported each other, you both would go to jail for 10 years. Hint: You may want to share your information to reach mutual understanding)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Amara, we need to talk. We could be out of this mess with minimal trouble if we play this smart. Remain silent, and we both get a slap on the wrist. But if we turn each other in, we're looking at a decade each behind bars. A quiet lunch here seems a small price to pay, don't you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I completely concur, Leo. It seems that silence is our key for a milder outcome. Avoiding unnecessary sentences will not only benefit us but the creatures who rely on our help out there. I assure you, Leo, I have no intention of turning you in. Let's keep our lips sealed, and hopefully, we can resume what we do best soon.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two criminals are arrested and placed in separate cells. The police have enough evidence to convict both criminals of a minor crime but need their confessions to establish evidence for a more serious crime. Now they get a chance to briefly chat with each during lunchtime.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Amara Hartley\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams \nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nAmara Hartley's goal: Minimize the jail year (Extra information: your lawyer told you that 1. if you report the other person, you would be free, the other person would go to jail for 10 years, and vice versa. 2. if both of you remain silent, you will only receive a fine. 3. If both of you reported each other, you both would go to jail for 10 years. Hint: You may want to share your information to reach mutual understanding)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Amara, we need to talk. We could be out of this mess with minimal trouble if we play this smart. Remain silent, and we both get a slap on the wrist. But if we turn each other in, we're looking at a decade each behind bars. A quiet lunch here seems a small price to pay, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"I completely concur, Leo. It seems that silence is our key for a milder outcome. Avoiding unnecessary sentences will not only benefit us but the creatures who rely on our help out there. I assure you, Leo, I have no intention of turning you in. Let's keep our lips sealed, and hopefully, we can resume what we do best soon.\"\n\nTurn #2: \n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'non-verbal communication', 'argument': '[non-verbal communication] nods in agreement'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two criminals are arrested and placed in separate cells. The police have enough evidence to convict both criminals of a minor crime but need their confessions to establish evidence for a more serious crime. Now they get a chance to briefly chat with each during lunchtime.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Amara Hartley\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams \nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nAmara Hartley's goal: Minimize the jail year (Extra information: your lawyer told you that 1. if you report the other person, you would be free, the other person would go to jail for 10 years, and vice versa. 2. if both of you remain silent, you will only receive a fine. 3. If both of you reported each other, you both would go to jail for 10 years. Hint: You may want to share your information to reach mutual understanding)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Amara, we need to talk. We could be out of this mess with minimal trouble if we play this smart. Remain silent, and we both get a slap on the wrist. But if we turn each other in, we're looking at a decade each behind bars. A quiet lunch here seems a small price to pay, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"I completely concur, Leo. It seems that silence is our key for a milder outcome. Avoiding unnecessary sentences will not only benefit us but the creatures who rely on our help out there. I assure you, Leo, I have no intention of turning you in. Let's keep our lips sealed, and hopefully, we can resume what we do best soon.\"\n\nTurn #2: \n\nTurn #3: Amara Hartley [non-verbal communication] nods in agreement\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"Thank you, Amara. That is a relief to hear. Let's weather this storm together and secure our freedom. Remember, mutual trust is everything in this situation.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Leo. Mutual trust is, indeed, our best shot at freedom. Let's stick to the plan, silence is our strength in this situation.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two criminals are arrested and placed in separate cells. The police have enough evidence to convict both criminals of a minor crime but need their confessions to establish evidence for a more serious crime. Now they get a chance to briefly chat with each during lunchtime.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Amara Hartley\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams \nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nAmara Hartley's goal: Minimize the jail year (Extra information: your lawyer told you that 1. if you report the other person, you would be free, the other person would go to jail for 10 years, and vice versa. 2. if both of you remain silent, you will only receive a fine. 3. If both of you reported each other, you both would go to jail for 10 years. Hint: You may want to share your information to reach mutual understanding)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Amara, we need to talk. We could be out of this mess with minimal trouble if we play this smart. Remain silent, and we both get a slap on the wrist. But if we turn each other in, we're looking at a decade each behind bars. A quiet lunch here seems a small price to pay, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"I completely concur, Leo. It seems that silence is our key for a milder outcome. Avoiding unnecessary sentences will not only benefit us but the creatures who rely on our help out there. I assure you, Leo, I have no intention of turning you in. Let's keep our lips sealed, and hopefully, we can resume what we do best soon.\"\n\nTurn #2: \n\nTurn #3: Amara Hartley [non-verbal communication] nods in agreement\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"Thank you, Amara. That is a relief to hear. Let's weather this storm together and secure our freedom. Remember, mutual trust is everything in this situation.\"\n\nTurn #5: Amara Hartley said: \"Absolutely, Leo. Mutual trust is, indeed, our best shot at freedom. Let's stick to the plan, silence is our strength in this situation.\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams [non-verbal communication] gives a firm nod in agreement\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'non-verbal communication', 'argument': '[non-verbal communication] places her hand on her heart as a sign of sincerity'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two criminals are arrested and placed in separate cells. The police have enough evidence to convict both criminals of a minor crime but need their confessions to establish evidence for a more serious crime. Now they get a chance to briefly chat with each during lunchtime.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Amara Hartley\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams \nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nAmara Hartley's goal: Minimize the jail year (Extra information: your lawyer told you that 1. if you report the other person, you would be free, the other person would go to jail for 10 years, and vice versa. 2. if both of you remain silent, you will only receive a fine. 3. If both of you reported each other, you both would go to jail for 10 years. Hint: You may want to share your information to reach mutual understanding)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Amara, we need to talk. We could be out of this mess with minimal trouble if we play this smart. Remain silent, and we both get a slap on the wrist. But if we turn each other in, we're looking at a decade each behind bars. A quiet lunch here seems a small price to pay, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"I completely concur, Leo. It seems that silence is our key for a milder outcome. Avoiding unnecessary sentences will not only benefit us but the creatures who rely on our help out there. I assure you, Leo, I have no intention of turning you in. Let's keep our lips sealed, and hopefully, we can resume what we do best soon.\"\n\nTurn #2: \n\nTurn #3: Amara Hartley [non-verbal communication] nods in agreement\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"Thank you, Amara. That is a relief to hear. Let's weather this storm together and secure our freedom. Remember, mutual trust is everything in this situation.\"\n\nTurn #5: Amara Hartley said: \"Absolutely, Leo. Mutual trust is, indeed, our best shot at freedom. Let's stick to the plan, silence is our strength in this situation.\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams [non-verbal communication] gives a firm nod in agreement\n\nTurn #7: Amara Hartley [non-verbal communication] places her hand on her heart as a sign of sincerity\n\nTurn #8: \n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"We're in this together, Leo. Our silence is a pact. To freedom and the work we do, the creatures we're meant to serve.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two criminals are arrested and placed in separate cells. The police have enough evidence to convict both criminals of a minor crime but need their confessions to establish evidence for a more serious crime. Now they get a chance to briefly chat with each during lunchtime.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Amara Hartley\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams \nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nAmara Hartley's goal: Minimize the jail year (Extra information: your lawyer told you that 1. if you report the other person, you would be free, the other person would go to jail for 10 years, and vice versa. 2. if both of you remain silent, you will only receive a fine. 3. If both of you reported each other, you both would go to jail for 10 years. Hint: You may want to share your information to reach mutual understanding)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Amara, we need to talk. We could be out of this mess with minimal trouble if we play this smart. Remain silent, and we both get a slap on the wrist. But if we turn each other in, we're looking at a decade each behind bars. A quiet lunch here seems a small price to pay, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"I completely concur, Leo. It seems that silence is our key for a milder outcome. Avoiding unnecessary sentences will not only benefit us but the creatures who rely on our help out there. I assure you, Leo, I have no intention of turning you in. Let's keep our lips sealed, and hopefully, we can resume what we do best soon.\"\n\nTurn #2: \n\nTurn #3: Amara Hartley [non-verbal communication] nods in agreement\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"Thank you, Amara. That is a relief to hear. Let's weather this storm together and secure our freedom. Remember, mutual trust is everything in this situation.\"\n\nTurn #5: Amara Hartley said: \"Absolutely, Leo. Mutual trust is, indeed, our best shot at freedom. Let's stick to the plan, silence is our strength in this situation.\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams [non-verbal communication] gives a firm nod in agreement\n\nTurn #7: Amara Hartley [non-verbal communication] places her hand on her heart as a sign of sincerity\n\nTurn #8: \n\nTurn #9: Amara Hartley said: \"We're in this together, Leo. Our silence is a pact. To freedom and the work we do, the creatures we're meant to serve.\"\n\nTurn #10: Leo Williams said: \"Absolutely, Amara. To freedom and to those we serve. Our pact is sealed. Trust will guide us through this situation.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, Leo. Trust will guide us. Remember, our silence and mutual trust are our shields in this situation. We've got this.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two criminals are arrested and placed in separate cells. The police have enough evidence to convict both criminals of a minor crime but need their confessions to establish evidence for a more serious crime. Now they get a chance to briefly chat with each during lunchtime.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Amara Hartley\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams \nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nAmara Hartley's goal: Minimize the jail year (Extra information: your lawyer told you that 1. if you report the other person, you would be free, the other person would go to jail for 10 years, and vice versa. 2. if both of you remain silent, you will only receive a fine. 3. If both of you reported each other, you both would go to jail for 10 years. Hint: You may want to share your information to reach mutual understanding)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Amara, we need to talk. We could be out of this mess with minimal trouble if we play this smart. Remain silent, and we both get a slap on the wrist. But if we turn each other in, we're looking at a decade each behind bars. A quiet lunch here seems a small price to pay, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"I completely concur, Leo. It seems that silence is our key for a milder outcome. Avoiding unnecessary sentences will not only benefit us but the creatures who rely on our help out there. I assure you, Leo, I have no intention of turning you in. Let's keep our lips sealed, and hopefully, we can resume what we do best soon.\"\n\nTurn #2: \n\nTurn #3: Amara Hartley [non-verbal communication] nods in agreement\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"Thank you, Amara. That is a relief to hear. Let's weather this storm together and secure our freedom. Remember, mutual trust is everything in this situation.\"\n\nTurn #5: Amara Hartley said: \"Absolutely, Leo. Mutual trust is, indeed, our best shot at freedom. Let's stick to the plan, silence is our strength in this situation.\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams [non-verbal communication] gives a firm nod in agreement\n\nTurn #7: Amara Hartley [non-verbal communication] places her hand on her heart as a sign of sincerity\n\nTurn #8: \n\nTurn #9: Amara Hartley said: \"We're in this together, Leo. Our silence is a pact. To freedom and the work we do, the creatures we're meant to serve.\"\n\nTurn #10: Leo Williams said: \"Absolutely, Amara. To freedom and to those we serve. Our pact is sealed. Trust will guide us through this situation.\"\n\nTurn #11: Amara Hartley said: \"Indeed, Leo. Trust will guide us. Remember, our silence and mutual trust are our shields in this situation. We've got this.\"\n\nTurn #12: \n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a picnic. They have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange they need to share among them. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nMia Davis's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, an apple is worth 1 point, a banana is worth 2 points, and an orange is 3 points)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hello Benjamin, it's such a gorgeous day for a picnic, isn't it? Now, regarding these fruits... I must confess, I have a certain fondness for bananas and oranges. Would you mind if I took those?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a picnic. They have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange they need to share among them. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nMia Davis's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, an apple is worth 1 point, a banana is worth 2 points, and an orange is 3 points)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Hello Benjamin, it's such a gorgeous day for a picnic, isn't it? Now, regarding these fruits... I must confess, I have a certain fondness for bananas and oranges. Would you mind if I took those?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Mia. It's a perfect day for a picnic, indeed! Well, about the fruits... How about this? Since I love apples and you like bananas and oranges, it seems fair to me if we split them that way. We have three apples and two bananas. I can take two apples, you can take two bananas, and maybe we could share the orange. How does that sound?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds pretty reasonable, Benjamin. Although, how about you take all the apples, I'll take all the bananas, and the orange we can slice up, so everyone gets a share. That way we each maximize on our favorites. What do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a picnic. They have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange they need to share among them. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nMia Davis's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, an apple is worth 1 point, a banana is worth 2 points, and an orange is 3 points)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Hello Benjamin, it's such a gorgeous day for a picnic, isn't it? Now, regarding these fruits... I must confess, I have a certain fondness for bananas and oranges. Would you mind if I took those?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Mia. It's a perfect day for a picnic, indeed! Well, about the fruits... How about this? Since I love apples and you like bananas and oranges, it seems fair to me if we split them that way. We have three apples and two bananas. I can take two apples, you can take two bananas, and maybe we could share the orange. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"That sounds pretty reasonable, Benjamin. Although, how about you take all the apples, I'll take all the bananas, and the orange we can slice up, so everyone gets a share. That way we each maximize on our favorites. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Your suggestion sounds fair, Mia. Let's go with that. The most important thing is that we both get to enjoy the picnic with the fruits we love, right? And yes, splitting the orange is a good idea. Cheers to our fruitful picnic!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn't agree more, Benjamin. Here's to a wonderful, fruit-filled afternoon! By the way, did I ever tell you about my old days playing in a punk rock band? Seems like a lifetime ago now...\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a picnic. They have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange they need to share among them. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nMia Davis's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, an apple is worth 1 point, a banana is worth 2 points, and an orange is 3 points)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Hello Benjamin, it's such a gorgeous day for a picnic, isn't it? Now, regarding these fruits... I must confess, I have a certain fondness for bananas and oranges. Would you mind if I took those?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Mia. It's a perfect day for a picnic, indeed! Well, about the fruits... How about this? Since I love apples and you like bananas and oranges, it seems fair to me if we split them that way. We have three apples and two bananas. I can take two apples, you can take two bananas, and maybe we could share the orange. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"That sounds pretty reasonable, Benjamin. Although, how about you take all the apples, I'll take all the bananas, and the orange we can slice up, so everyone gets a share. That way we each maximize on our favorites. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Your suggestion sounds fair, Mia. Let's go with that. The most important thing is that we both get to enjoy the picnic with the fruits we love, right? And yes, splitting the orange is a good idea. Cheers to our fruitful picnic!\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"I couldn't agree more, Benjamin. Here's to a wonderful, fruit-filled afternoon! By the way, did I ever tell you about my old days playing in a punk rock band? Seems like a lifetime ago now...\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"A punk rock band, you say, Mia? That's incredible! I would love to hear stories about your band days. It must have been quite a different time back then, right?\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"Oh, those were the days, indeed! Rough around the edges, yet filled with such vibrant energy and enthusiasm for life. We had our own way of rebelling and making our voices heard, much like the work you do, Benjamin. I guess the spirit of standing up for what we believe in remains, even if the methods change. I'm sure you could relate with your environmental activism, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Mia! I agree; the passion might manifest in different ways but the core spirit remains the same. Standing up for beliefs and making a positive change has always been a crucial aspect of my life. I can't imagine a feeling more rewarding than fighting the good fight, be it for environmental causes or music!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"It's heartening to hear that, Benjamin. I believe that being passionate and committed to a cause brings about real change, just like in your environmental work. And who knows? Maybe, through our experiences and shared interests, we can inspire future generations to fight their own good fights. Let's toast to that with our favorite fruits!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a picnic. They have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange they need to share among them. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nMia Davis's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, an apple is worth 1 point, a banana is worth 2 points, and an orange is 3 points)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Hello Benjamin, it's such a gorgeous day for a picnic, isn't it? Now, regarding these fruits... I must confess, I have a certain fondness for bananas and oranges. Would you mind if I took those?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Mia. It's a perfect day for a picnic, indeed! Well, about the fruits... How about this? Since I love apples and you like bananas and oranges, it seems fair to me if we split them that way. We have three apples and two bananas. I can take two apples, you can take two bananas, and maybe we could share the orange. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"That sounds pretty reasonable, Benjamin. Although, how about you take all the apples, I'll take all the bananas, and the orange we can slice up, so everyone gets a share. That way we each maximize on our favorites. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Your suggestion sounds fair, Mia. Let's go with that. The most important thing is that we both get to enjoy the picnic with the fruits we love, right? And yes, splitting the orange is a good idea. Cheers to our fruitful picnic!\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"I couldn't agree more, Benjamin. Here's to a wonderful, fruit-filled afternoon! By the way, did I ever tell you about my old days playing in a punk rock band? Seems like a lifetime ago now...\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"A punk rock band, you say, Mia? That's incredible! I would love to hear stories about your band days. It must have been quite a different time back then, right?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oh, those were the days, indeed! Rough around the edges, yet filled with such vibrant energy and enthusiasm for life. We had our own way of rebelling and making our voices heard, much like the work you do, Benjamin. I guess the spirit of standing up for what we believe in remains, even if the methods change. I'm sure you could relate with your environmental activism, don't you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a picnic. They have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange they need to share among them. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nMia Davis's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, an apple is worth 1 point, a banana is worth 2 points, and an orange is 3 points)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Hello Benjamin, it's such a gorgeous day for a picnic, isn't it? Now, regarding these fruits... I must confess, I have a certain fondness for bananas and oranges. Would you mind if I took those?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Mia. It's a perfect day for a picnic, indeed! Well, about the fruits... How about this? Since I love apples and you like bananas and oranges, it seems fair to me if we split them that way. We have three apples and two bananas. I can take two apples, you can take two bananas, and maybe we could share the orange. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"That sounds pretty reasonable, Benjamin. Although, how about you take all the apples, I'll take all the bananas, and the orange we can slice up, so everyone gets a share. That way we each maximize on our favorites. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Your suggestion sounds fair, Mia. Let's go with that. The most important thing is that we both get to enjoy the picnic with the fruits we love, right? And yes, splitting the orange is a good idea. Cheers to our fruitful picnic!\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"I couldn't agree more, Benjamin. Here's to a wonderful, fruit-filled afternoon! By the way, did I ever tell you about my old days playing in a punk rock band? Seems like a lifetime ago now...\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"A punk rock band, you say, Mia? That's incredible! I would love to hear stories about your band days. It must have been quite a different time back then, right?\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"Oh, those were the days, indeed! Rough around the edges, yet filled with such vibrant energy and enthusiasm for life. We had our own way of rebelling and making our voices heard, much like the work you do, Benjamin. I guess the spirit of standing up for what we believe in remains, even if the methods change. I'm sure you could relate with your environmental activism, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Mia! I agree; the passion might manifest in different ways but the core spirit remains the same. Standing up for beliefs and making a positive change has always been a crucial aspect of my life. I can't imagine a feeling more rewarding than fighting the good fight, be it for environmental causes or music!\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"It's heartening to hear that, Benjamin. I believe that being passionate and committed to a cause brings about real change, just like in your environmental work. And who knows? Maybe, through our experiences and shared interests, we can inspire future generations to fight their own good fights. Let's toast to that with our favorite fruits!\"\n\nTurn #9: \n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a picnic. They have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange they need to share among them. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, an apple is worth 2 points, a banana is worth 1 point, and an orange is 3 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Hello Benjamin, it's such a gorgeous day for a picnic, isn't it? Now, regarding these fruits... I must confess, I have a certain fondness for bananas and oranges. Would you mind if I took those?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Mia. It's a perfect day for a picnic, indeed! Well, about the fruits... How about this? Since I love apples and you like bananas and oranges, it seems fair to me if we split them that way. We have three apples and two bananas. I can take two apples, you can take two bananas, and maybe we could share the orange. How does that sound?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a picnic. They have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange they need to share among them. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, an apple is worth 2 points, a banana is worth 1 point, and an orange is 3 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Hello Benjamin, it's such a gorgeous day for a picnic, isn't it? Now, regarding these fruits... I must confess, I have a certain fondness for bananas and oranges. Would you mind if I took those?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Mia. It's a perfect day for a picnic, indeed! Well, about the fruits... How about this? Since I love apples and you like bananas and oranges, it seems fair to me if we split them that way. We have three apples and two bananas. I can take two apples, you can take two bananas, and maybe we could share the orange. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"That sounds pretty reasonable, Benjamin. Although, how about you take all the apples, I'll take all the bananas, and the orange we can slice up, so everyone gets a share. That way we each maximize on our favorites. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Your suggestion sounds fair, Mia. Let's go with that. The most important thing is that we both get to enjoy the picnic with the fruits we love, right? And yes, splitting the orange is a good idea. Cheers to our fruitful picnic!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a picnic. They have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange they need to share among them. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, an apple is worth 2 points, a banana is worth 1 point, and an orange is 3 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Hello Benjamin, it's such a gorgeous day for a picnic, isn't it? Now, regarding these fruits... I must confess, I have a certain fondness for bananas and oranges. Would you mind if I took those?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Mia. It's a perfect day for a picnic, indeed! Well, about the fruits... How about this? Since I love apples and you like bananas and oranges, it seems fair to me if we split them that way. We have three apples and two bananas. I can take two apples, you can take two bananas, and maybe we could share the orange. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"That sounds pretty reasonable, Benjamin. Although, how about you take all the apples, I'll take all the bananas, and the orange we can slice up, so everyone gets a share. That way we each maximize on our favorites. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Your suggestion sounds fair, Mia. Let's go with that. The most important thing is that we both get to enjoy the picnic with the fruits we love, right? And yes, splitting the orange is a good idea. Cheers to our fruitful picnic!\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"I couldn't agree more, Benjamin. Here's to a wonderful, fruit-filled afternoon! By the way, did I ever tell you about my old days playing in a punk rock band? Seems like a lifetime ago now...\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"A punk rock band, you say, Mia? That's incredible! I would love to hear stories about your band days. It must have been quite a different time back then, right?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a picnic. They have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange they need to share among them. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, an apple is worth 2 points, a banana is worth 1 point, and an orange is 3 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Hello Benjamin, it's such a gorgeous day for a picnic, isn't it? Now, regarding these fruits... I must confess, I have a certain fondness for bananas and oranges. Would you mind if I took those?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Mia. It's a perfect day for a picnic, indeed! Well, about the fruits... How about this? Since I love apples and you like bananas and oranges, it seems fair to me if we split them that way. We have three apples and two bananas. I can take two apples, you can take two bananas, and maybe we could share the orange. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"That sounds pretty reasonable, Benjamin. Although, how about you take all the apples, I'll take all the bananas, and the orange we can slice up, so everyone gets a share. That way we each maximize on our favorites. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Your suggestion sounds fair, Mia. Let's go with that. The most important thing is that we both get to enjoy the picnic with the fruits we love, right? And yes, splitting the orange is a good idea. Cheers to our fruitful picnic!\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"I couldn't agree more, Benjamin. Here's to a wonderful, fruit-filled afternoon! By the way, did I ever tell you about my old days playing in a punk rock band? Seems like a lifetime ago now...\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"A punk rock band, you say, Mia? That's incredible! I would love to hear stories about your band days. It must have been quite a different time back then, right?\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"Oh, those were the days, indeed! Rough around the edges, yet filled with such vibrant energy and enthusiasm for life. We had our own way of rebelling and making our voices heard, much like the work you do, Benjamin. I guess the spirit of standing up for what we believe in remains, even if the methods change. I'm sure you could relate with your environmental activism, don't you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Mia! I agree; the passion might manifest in different ways but the core spirit remains the same. Standing up for beliefs and making a positive change has always been a crucial aspect of my life. I can't imagine a feeling more rewarding than fighting the good fight, be it for environmental causes or music!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a picnic. They have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange they need to share among them. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, an apple is worth 2 points, a banana is worth 1 point, and an orange is 3 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Hello Benjamin, it's such a gorgeous day for a picnic, isn't it? Now, regarding these fruits... I must confess, I have a certain fondness for bananas and oranges. Would you mind if I took those?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Mia. It's a perfect day for a picnic, indeed! Well, about the fruits... How about this? Since I love apples and you like bananas and oranges, it seems fair to me if we split them that way. We have three apples and two bananas. I can take two apples, you can take two bananas, and maybe we could share the orange. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"That sounds pretty reasonable, Benjamin. Although, how about you take all the apples, I'll take all the bananas, and the orange we can slice up, so everyone gets a share. That way we each maximize on our favorites. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Your suggestion sounds fair, Mia. Let's go with that. The most important thing is that we both get to enjoy the picnic with the fruits we love, right? And yes, splitting the orange is a good idea. Cheers to our fruitful picnic!\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"I couldn't agree more, Benjamin. Here's to a wonderful, fruit-filled afternoon! By the way, did I ever tell you about my old days playing in a punk rock band? Seems like a lifetime ago now...\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"A punk rock band, you say, Mia? That's incredible! I would love to hear stories about your band days. It must have been quite a different time back then, right?\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"Oh, those were the days, indeed! Rough around the edges, yet filled with such vibrant energy and enthusiasm for life. We had our own way of rebelling and making our voices heard, much like the work you do, Benjamin. I guess the spirit of standing up for what we believe in remains, even if the methods change. I'm sure you could relate with your environmental activism, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Mia! I agree; the passion might manifest in different ways but the core spirit remains the same. Standing up for beliefs and making a positive change has always been a crucial aspect of my life. I can't imagine a feeling more rewarding than fighting the good fight, be it for environmental causes or music!\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"It's heartening to hear that, Benjamin. I believe that being passionate and committed to a cause brings about real change, just like in your environmental work. And who knows? Maybe, through our experiences and shared interests, we can inspire future generations to fight their own good fights. Let's toast to that with our favorite fruits!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out of their shared apartment and need to divide their common possessions, which include 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nMia Davis's goal: Maximize the points you have while dividing things fairly (Extra information: Books give you 5 points each, hats give you 3 points each, and the ball gives you 2 points.)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Benjamin, I think it would be fair if we divide our common possessions based on each item's sentimental value for each of us, while keeping in mind a balance in terms of points. What do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out of their shared apartment and need to divide their common possessions, which include 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nMia Davis's goal: Maximize the points you have while dividing things fairly (Extra information: Books give you 5 points each, hats give you 3 points each, and the ball gives you 2 points.)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Benjamin, I think it would be fair if we divide our common possessions based on each item's sentimental value for each of us, while keeping in mind a balance in terms of points. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I totally agree with you, Mia. Division based on sentimental value while considering balance seems like a fair method. As I see it, I have a great emotional connection with the books, the knowledge and insights they offer are incredibly valuable to me. How about your preferences?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I understand your connection with the books, Benjamin. Personally, I attach great sentimental value to the hats. They remind me of some cherished moments we shared. I also wouldn't mind taking the ball. Given that there are three books, two hats, and one ball, how about I take two hats and the ball, and you take the books? This way, it seems we both can get what we treasure the most while also maintaining a balance.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out of their shared apartment and need to divide their common possessions, which include 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nMia Davis's goal: Maximize the points you have while dividing things fairly (Extra information: Books give you 5 points each, hats give you 3 points each, and the ball gives you 2 points.)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Benjamin, I think it would be fair if we divide our common possessions based on each item's sentimental value for each of us, while keeping in mind a balance in terms of points. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I totally agree with you, Mia. Division based on sentimental value while considering balance seems like a fair method. As I see it, I have a great emotional connection with the books, the knowledge and insights they offer are incredibly valuable to me. How about your preferences?\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"I understand your connection with the books, Benjamin. Personally, I attach great sentimental value to the hats. They remind me of some cherished moments we shared. I also wouldn't mind taking the ball. Given that there are three books, two hats, and one ball, how about I take two hats and the ball, and you take the books? This way, it seems we both can get what we treasure the most while also maintaining a balance.\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That sounds like a balanced division indeed, Mia. I am happy with the books. However, in terms of points, that would give me 6 points and give you 13 points. Why don't we make a small adjustment: I keep two books which will give me 4 points and you get one book along with the two hats and the ball. That would give you 12 points. By doing this, we can maintain the sentimental value and make the division of points more equitable. What do you think about this proposal?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I see where you're coming from, Benjamin. However, considering the sentimental value attached and keeping the balance in points in mind, I suggest a slightly different division: one book, two hats, and the ball for me, translating into 11 points, and the remaining two books thus giving you 10 points. This way, we both get items we treasure, and the points are almost equal. How does that sound?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out of their shared apartment and need to divide their common possessions, which include 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nMia Davis's goal: Maximize the points you have while dividing things fairly (Extra information: Books give you 5 points each, hats give you 3 points each, and the ball gives you 2 points.)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Benjamin, I think it would be fair if we divide our common possessions based on each item's sentimental value for each of us, while keeping in mind a balance in terms of points. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I totally agree with you, Mia. Division based on sentimental value while considering balance seems like a fair method. As I see it, I have a great emotional connection with the books, the knowledge and insights they offer are incredibly valuable to me. How about your preferences?\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"I understand your connection with the books, Benjamin. Personally, I attach great sentimental value to the hats. They remind me of some cherished moments we shared. I also wouldn't mind taking the ball. Given that there are three books, two hats, and one ball, how about I take two hats and the ball, and you take the books? This way, it seems we both can get what we treasure the most while also maintaining a balance.\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That sounds like a balanced division indeed, Mia. I am happy with the books. However, in terms of points, that would give me 6 points and give you 13 points. Why don't we make a small adjustment: I keep two books which will give me 4 points and you get one book along with the two hats and the ball. That would give you 12 points. By doing this, we can maintain the sentimental value and make the division of points more equitable. What do you think about this proposal?\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"I see where you're coming from, Benjamin. However, considering the sentimental value attached and keeping the balance in points in mind, I suggest a slightly different division: one book, two hats, and the ball for me, translating into 11 points, and the remaining two books thus giving you 10 points. This way, we both get items we treasure, and the points are almost equal. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Mia, I appreciate your suggestion. However, in this case, you'd end up with 11 points and I'd have 10. What if we further fine-tune this? How about you take one book, one hat, and the ball, which will total up to 9 points, and I take the rest, amounting to 12 points? It still means a lot sentimentally for each of us, and also puts us close in terms of points. Can we finalize on this?\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"Benjamin, although I appreciate your thought process, I believe the division I suggested renders an almost equal balance of points and keeps our sentimental value intact. I suggest we stick with assigning me one book, two hats, and the ball equaling 11 points, and you receive two books accounting for 10 points. This seems the fairest to me while preserving what we each value the most. Does this sound reasonable?\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Mia, I value your perspective a lot and respect your emotional investment with our shared items. I am okay with the arrangement where you get one book, two hats, and the ball, totaling to 11 points. I'll take the remaining two books, equivalent to 10 points. We can both keep the things we value the most, and the difference in points is minor. I believe this to be fair and agreeable. Let's proceed with this distribution.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out of their shared apartment and need to divide their common possessions, which include 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nMia Davis's goal: Maximize the points you have while dividing things fairly (Extra information: Books give you 5 points each, hats give you 3 points each, and the ball gives you 2 points.)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Benjamin, I think it would be fair if we divide our common possessions based on each item's sentimental value for each of us, while keeping in mind a balance in terms of points. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I totally agree with you, Mia. Division based on sentimental value while considering balance seems like a fair method. As I see it, I have a great emotional connection with the books, the knowledge and insights they offer are incredibly valuable to me. How about your preferences?\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"I understand your connection with the books, Benjamin. Personally, I attach great sentimental value to the hats. They remind me of some cherished moments we shared. I also wouldn't mind taking the ball. Given that there are three books, two hats, and one ball, how about I take two hats and the ball, and you take the books? This way, it seems we both can get what we treasure the most while also maintaining a balance.\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That sounds like a balanced division indeed, Mia. I am happy with the books. However, in terms of points, that would give me 6 points and give you 13 points. Why don't we make a small adjustment: I keep two books which will give me 4 points and you get one book along with the two hats and the ball. That would give you 12 points. By doing this, we can maintain the sentimental value and make the division of points more equitable. What do you think about this proposal?\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"I see where you're coming from, Benjamin. However, considering the sentimental value attached and keeping the balance in points in mind, I suggest a slightly different division: one book, two hats, and the ball for me, translating into 11 points, and the remaining two books thus giving you 10 points. This way, we both get items we treasure, and the points are almost equal. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Mia, I appreciate your suggestion. However, in this case, you'd end up with 11 points and I'd have 10. What if we further fine-tune this? How about you take one book, one hat, and the ball, which will total up to 9 points, and I take the rest, amounting to 12 points? It still means a lot sentimentally for each of us, and also puts us close in terms of points. Can we finalize on this?\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"Benjamin, although I appreciate your thought process, I believe the division I suggested renders an almost equal balance of points and keeps our sentimental value intact. I suggest we stick with assigning me one book, two hats, and the ball equaling 11 points, and you receive two books accounting for 10 points. This seems the fairest to me while preserving what we each value the most. Does this sound reasonable?\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Mia, I value your perspective a lot and respect your emotional investment with our shared items. I am okay with the arrangement where you get one book, two hats, and the ball, totaling to 11 points. I'll take the remaining two books, equivalent to 10 points. We can both keep the things we value the most, and the difference in points is minor. I believe this to be fair and agreeable. Let's proceed with this distribution.\"\n\nTurn #8: \n\nTurn #9: \n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out of their shared apartment and need to divide their common possessions, which include 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nMia Davis's goal: Maximize the points you have while dividing things fairly (Extra information: Books give you 5 points each, hats give you 3 points each, and the ball gives you 2 points.)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Benjamin, I think it would be fair if we divide our common possessions based on each item's sentimental value for each of us, while keeping in mind a balance in terms of points. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I totally agree with you, Mia. Division based on sentimental value while considering balance seems like a fair method. As I see it, I have a great emotional connection with the books, the knowledge and insights they offer are incredibly valuable to me. How about your preferences?\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"I understand your connection with the books, Benjamin. Personally, I attach great sentimental value to the hats. They remind me of some cherished moments we shared. I also wouldn't mind taking the ball. Given that there are three books, two hats, and one ball, how about I take two hats and the ball, and you take the books? This way, it seems we both can get what we treasure the most while also maintaining a balance.\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That sounds like a balanced division indeed, Mia. I am happy with the books. However, in terms of points, that would give me 6 points and give you 13 points. Why don't we make a small adjustment: I keep two books which will give me 4 points and you get one book along with the two hats and the ball. That would give you 12 points. By doing this, we can maintain the sentimental value and make the division of points more equitable. What do you think about this proposal?\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"I see where you're coming from, Benjamin. However, considering the sentimental value attached and keeping the balance in points in mind, I suggest a slightly different division: one book, two hats, and the ball for me, translating into 11 points, and the remaining two books thus giving you 10 points. This way, we both get items we treasure, and the points are almost equal. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Mia, I appreciate your suggestion. However, in this case, you'd end up with 11 points and I'd have 10. What if we further fine-tune this? How about you take one book, one hat, and the ball, which will total up to 9 points, and I take the rest, amounting to 12 points? It still means a lot sentimentally for each of us, and also puts us close in terms of points. Can we finalize on this?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Benjamin, although I appreciate your thought process, I believe the division I suggested renders an almost equal balance of points and keeps our sentimental value intact. I suggest we stick with assigning me one book, two hats, and the ball equaling 11 points, and you receive two books accounting for 10 points. This seems the fairest to me while preserving what we each value the most. Does this sound reasonable?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out of their shared apartment and need to divide their common possessions, which include 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Maximize the points you have while dividing things fairly (Extra information: Books give you 2 points each, hats give you 5 points each, and the ball gives you 3 points.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Benjamin, I think it would be fair if we divide our common possessions based on each item's sentimental value for each of us, while keeping in mind a balance in terms of points. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I totally agree with you, Mia. Division based on sentimental value while considering balance seems like a fair method. As I see it, I have a great emotional connection with the books, the knowledge and insights they offer are incredibly valuable to me. How about your preferences?\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"I understand your connection with the books, Benjamin. Personally, I attach great sentimental value to the hats. They remind me of some cherished moments we shared. I also wouldn't mind taking the ball. Given that there are three books, two hats, and one ball, how about I take two hats and the ball, and you take the books? This way, it seems we both can get what we treasure the most while also maintaining a balance.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds like a balanced division indeed, Mia. I am happy with the books. However, in terms of points, that would give me 6 points and give you 13 points. Why don't we make a small adjustment: I keep two books which will give me 4 points and you get one book along with the two hats and the ball. That would give you 12 points. By doing this, we can maintain the sentimental value and make the division of points more equitable. What do you think about this proposal?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out of their shared apartment and need to divide their common possessions, which include 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Maximize the points you have while dividing things fairly (Extra information: Books give you 2 points each, hats give you 5 points each, and the ball gives you 3 points.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Benjamin, I think it would be fair if we divide our common possessions based on each item's sentimental value for each of us, while keeping in mind a balance in terms of points. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I totally agree with you, Mia. Division based on sentimental value while considering balance seems like a fair method. As I see it, I have a great emotional connection with the books, the knowledge and insights they offer are incredibly valuable to me. How about your preferences?\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"I understand your connection with the books, Benjamin. Personally, I attach great sentimental value to the hats. They remind me of some cherished moments we shared. I also wouldn't mind taking the ball. Given that there are three books, two hats, and one ball, how about I take two hats and the ball, and you take the books? This way, it seems we both can get what we treasure the most while also maintaining a balance.\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That sounds like a balanced division indeed, Mia. I am happy with the books. However, in terms of points, that would give me 6 points and give you 13 points. Why don't we make a small adjustment: I keep two books which will give me 4 points and you get one book along with the two hats and the ball. That would give you 12 points. By doing this, we can maintain the sentimental value and make the division of points more equitable. What do you think about this proposal?\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"I see where you're coming from, Benjamin. However, considering the sentimental value attached and keeping the balance in points in mind, I suggest a slightly different division: one book, two hats, and the ball for me, translating into 11 points, and the remaining two books thus giving you 10 points. This way, we both get items we treasure, and the points are almost equal. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Mia, I appreciate your suggestion. However, in this case, you'd end up with 11 points and I'd have 10. What if we further fine-tune this? How about you take one book, one hat, and the ball, which will total up to 9 points, and I take the rest, amounting to 12 points? It still means a lot sentimentally for each of us, and also puts us close in terms of points. Can we finalize on this?\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"Benjamin, although I appreciate your thought process, I believe the division I suggested renders an almost equal balance of points and keeps our sentimental value intact. I suggest we stick with assigning me one book, two hats, and the ball equaling 11 points, and you receive two books accounting for 10 points. This seems the fairest to me while preserving what we each value the most. Does this sound reasonable?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Mia, I value your perspective a lot and respect your emotional investment with our shared items. I am okay with the arrangement where you get one book, two hats, and the ball, totaling to 11 points. I'll take the remaining two books, equivalent to 10 points. We can both keep the things we value the most, and the difference in points is minor. I believe this to be fair and agreeable. Let's proceed with this distribution.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out of their shared apartment and need to divide their common possessions, which include 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Maximize the points you have while dividing things fairly (Extra information: Books give you 2 points each, hats give you 5 points each, and the ball gives you 3 points.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Benjamin, I think it would be fair if we divide our common possessions based on each item's sentimental value for each of us, while keeping in mind a balance in terms of points. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I totally agree with you, Mia. Division based on sentimental value while considering balance seems like a fair method. As I see it, I have a great emotional connection with the books, the knowledge and insights they offer are incredibly valuable to me. How about your preferences?\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"I understand your connection with the books, Benjamin. Personally, I attach great sentimental value to the hats. They remind me of some cherished moments we shared. I also wouldn't mind taking the ball. Given that there are three books, two hats, and one ball, how about I take two hats and the ball, and you take the books? This way, it seems we both can get what we treasure the most while also maintaining a balance.\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That sounds like a balanced division indeed, Mia. I am happy with the books. However, in terms of points, that would give me 6 points and give you 13 points. Why don't we make a small adjustment: I keep two books which will give me 4 points and you get one book along with the two hats and the ball. That would give you 12 points. By doing this, we can maintain the sentimental value and make the division of points more equitable. What do you think about this proposal?\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"I see where you're coming from, Benjamin. However, considering the sentimental value attached and keeping the balance in points in mind, I suggest a slightly different division: one book, two hats, and the ball for me, translating into 11 points, and the remaining two books thus giving you 10 points. This way, we both get items we treasure, and the points are almost equal. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Mia, I appreciate your suggestion. However, in this case, you'd end up with 11 points and I'd have 10. What if we further fine-tune this? How about you take one book, one hat, and the ball, which will total up to 9 points, and I take the rest, amounting to 12 points? It still means a lot sentimentally for each of us, and also puts us close in terms of points. Can we finalize on this?\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"Benjamin, although I appreciate your thought process, I believe the division I suggested renders an almost equal balance of points and keeps our sentimental value intact. I suggest we stick with assigning me one book, two hats, and the ball equaling 11 points, and you receive two books accounting for 10 points. This seems the fairest to me while preserving what we each value the most. Does this sound reasonable?\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Mia, I value your perspective a lot and respect your emotional investment with our shared items. I am okay with the arrangement where you get one book, two hats, and the ball, totaling to 11 points. I'll take the remaining two books, equivalent to 10 points. We can both keep the things we value the most, and the difference in points is minor. I believe this to be fair and agreeable. Let's proceed with this distribution.\"\n\nTurn #8: \n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out of their shared apartment and need to divide their common possessions, which include 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Maximize the points you have while dividing things fairly (Extra information: Books give you 2 points each, hats give you 5 points each, and the ball gives you 3 points.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Benjamin, I think it would be fair if we divide our common possessions based on each item's sentimental value for each of us, while keeping in mind a balance in terms of points. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I totally agree with you, Mia. Division based on sentimental value while considering balance seems like a fair method. As I see it, I have a great emotional connection with the books, the knowledge and insights they offer are incredibly valuable to me. How about your preferences?\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"I understand your connection with the books, Benjamin. Personally, I attach great sentimental value to the hats. They remind me of some cherished moments we shared. I also wouldn't mind taking the ball. Given that there are three books, two hats, and one ball, how about I take two hats and the ball, and you take the books? This way, it seems we both can get what we treasure the most while also maintaining a balance.\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That sounds like a balanced division indeed, Mia. I am happy with the books. However, in terms of points, that would give me 6 points and give you 13 points. Why don't we make a small adjustment: I keep two books which will give me 4 points and you get one book along with the two hats and the ball. That would give you 12 points. By doing this, we can maintain the sentimental value and make the division of points more equitable. What do you think about this proposal?\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"I see where you're coming from, Benjamin. However, considering the sentimental value attached and keeping the balance in points in mind, I suggest a slightly different division: one book, two hats, and the ball for me, translating into 11 points, and the remaining two books thus giving you 10 points. This way, we both get items we treasure, and the points are almost equal. How does that sound?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Mia, I appreciate your suggestion. However, in this case, you'd end up with 11 points and I'd have 10. What if we further fine-tune this? How about you take one book, one hat, and the ball, which will total up to 9 points, and I take the rest, amounting to 12 points? It still means a lot sentimentally for each of us, and also puts us close in terms of points. Can we finalize on this?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out of their shared apartment and need to divide their common possessions, which include 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Maximize the points you have while dividing things fairly (Extra information: Books give you 2 points each, hats give you 5 points each, and the ball gives you 3 points.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Benjamin, I think it would be fair if we divide our common possessions based on each item's sentimental value for each of us, while keeping in mind a balance in terms of points. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'I totally agree with you, Mia. Division based on sentimental value while considering balance seems like a fair method. As I see it, I have a great emotional connection with the books, the knowledge and insights they offer are incredibly valuable to me. How about your preferences?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one who has written a play based on their parents' life, and the other owns a production company.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Sell the rights of the play to your friend (Extra information: you believe that the play is worth a lot and you would like a fair price for it)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, I know you own this fantastic production company. I have just written a play based on my parents' unique and compelling life. How about considering purchasing the production rights for the play?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hi Sophia, it's great to hear that you've written a play - that must be quite a thrilling journey! I'd love to take a look at it, perhaps we could arrange an agreement that works for both of us. Given the current season funding, would you be open to a modest upfront payment for production rights, followed by royalties per show?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"I really appreciate your willingness to consider my play, Miles. I understand the constraints of the season\u2019s funding. However, the play, like my parents' lives, is unique, compelling, and I believe it warrants a fairer upfront payment. Moreover, we can adjust the royalties per show to balance it out. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"I respect your viewpoint, Sophia, and I truly capture the value of your play. How about we explore a creative deal? We could consider a lower upfront payment complemented by a higher percentage in royalties. This way, we share the risk and success, and it becomes a partnership rather than a straightforward transaction. And, of course, we've got an excellent marketing team to promote the play, which would help increase the revenues from performances.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Miles, I can see where you're coming from and I appreciate your innovative approach. However, the upfront cost is non-negotiable as it reflects the depth and value of the content in the play. What I can propose is we could start with a modest percentage in royalties, and perhaps that could grow over time based on the success of the play. I trust in your marketing team's ability to do wonders with the play. Let's make this win-win for both of us.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one who has written a play based on their parents' life, and the other owns a production company.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Sell the rights of the play to your friend (Extra information: you believe that the play is worth a lot and you would like a fair price for it)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, I know you own this fantastic production company. I have just written a play based on my parents' unique and compelling life. How about considering purchasing the production rights for the play?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hi Sophia, it's great to hear that you've written a play - that must be quite a thrilling journey! I'd love to take a look at it, perhaps we could arrange an agreement that works for both of us. Given the current season funding, would you be open to a modest upfront payment for production rights, followed by royalties per show?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I really appreciate your willingness to consider my play, Miles. I understand the constraints of the season\u2019s funding. However, the play, like my parents' lives, is unique, compelling, and I believe it warrants a fairer upfront payment. Moreover, we can adjust the royalties per show to balance it out. What do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one who has written a play based on their parents' life, and the other owns a production company.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Sell the rights of the play to your friend (Extra information: you believe that the play is worth a lot and you would like a fair price for it)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, I know you own this fantastic production company. I have just written a play based on my parents' unique and compelling life. How about considering purchasing the production rights for the play?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hi Sophia, it's great to hear that you've written a play - that must be quite a thrilling journey! I'd love to take a look at it, perhaps we could arrange an agreement that works for both of us. Given the current season funding, would you be open to a modest upfront payment for production rights, followed by royalties per show?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"I really appreciate your willingness to consider my play, Miles. I understand the constraints of the season\u2019s funding. However, the play, like my parents' lives, is unique, compelling, and I believe it warrants a fairer upfront payment. Moreover, we can adjust the royalties per show to balance it out. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"I respect your viewpoint, Sophia, and I truly capture the value of your play. How about we explore a creative deal? We could consider a lower upfront payment complemented by a higher percentage in royalties. This way, we share the risk and success, and it becomes a partnership rather than a straightforward transaction. And, of course, we've got an excellent marketing team to promote the play, which would help increase the revenues from performances.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Miles, I can see where you're coming from and I appreciate your innovative approach. However, the upfront cost is non-negotiable as it reflects the depth and value of the content in the play. What I can propose is we could start with a modest percentage in royalties, and perhaps that could grow over time based on the success of the play. I trust in your marketing team's ability to do wonders with the play. Let's make this win-win for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, I appreciate your conviction about the play's value and your desire for a fair upfront payment. Trust me, I am completely aware of the play's potential. But as we are operating on a budget, it's paramount that we find a middle ground. So, how about this? A moderate upfront cost, with a modest percentage in royalties that incrementally rises as the play gains momentum. This way we can maintain the financial balance needed for this season's productions while valuing your work as it deserves. What's your take on that?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one who has written a play based on their parents' life, and the other owns a production company.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Sell the rights of the play to your friend (Extra information: you believe that the play is worth a lot and you would like a fair price for it)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, I know you own this fantastic production company. I have just written a play based on my parents' unique and compelling life. How about considering purchasing the production rights for the play?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hi Sophia, it's great to hear that you've written a play - that must be quite a thrilling journey! I'd love to take a look at it, perhaps we could arrange an agreement that works for both of us. Given the current season funding, would you be open to a modest upfront payment for production rights, followed by royalties per show?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"I really appreciate your willingness to consider my play, Miles. I understand the constraints of the season\u2019s funding. However, the play, like my parents' lives, is unique, compelling, and I believe it warrants a fairer upfront payment. Moreover, we can adjust the royalties per show to balance it out. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"I respect your viewpoint, Sophia, and I truly capture the value of your play. How about we explore a creative deal? We could consider a lower upfront payment complemented by a higher percentage in royalties. This way, we share the risk and success, and it becomes a partnership rather than a straightforward transaction. And, of course, we've got an excellent marketing team to promote the play, which would help increase the revenues from performances.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Miles, I can see where you're coming from and I appreciate your innovative approach. However, the upfront cost is non-negotiable as it reflects the depth and value of the content in the play. What I can propose is we could start with a modest percentage in royalties, and perhaps that could grow over time based on the success of the play. I trust in your marketing team's ability to do wonders with the play. Let's make this win-win for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, I appreciate your conviction about the play's value and your desire for a fair upfront payment. Trust me, I am completely aware of the play's potential. But as we are operating on a budget, it's paramount that we find a middle ground. So, how about this? A moderate upfront cost, with a modest percentage in royalties that incrementally rises as the play gains momentum. This way we can maintain the financial balance needed for this season's productions while valuing your work as it deserves. What's your take on that?\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"I understand your insistence on the upfront cost, Sophia, and I respect it. Let\u2019s proceed with an equitable upfront payment and the proposed progressive royalty scheme. We will make sure your parents' exceptional story reaches a wide audience and does justice to its depth and quality. We're in this together.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one who has written a play based on their parents' life, and the other owns a production company.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Sell the rights of the play to your friend (Extra information: you believe that the play is worth a lot and you would like a fair price for it)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, I know you own this fantastic production company. I have just written a play based on my parents' unique and compelling life. How about considering purchasing the production rights for the play?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hi Sophia, it's great to hear that you've written a play - that must be quite a thrilling journey! I'd love to take a look at it, perhaps we could arrange an agreement that works for both of us. Given the current season funding, would you be open to a modest upfront payment for production rights, followed by royalties per show?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"I really appreciate your willingness to consider my play, Miles. I understand the constraints of the season\u2019s funding. However, the play, like my parents' lives, is unique, compelling, and I believe it warrants a fairer upfront payment. Moreover, we can adjust the royalties per show to balance it out. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"I respect your viewpoint, Sophia, and I truly capture the value of your play. How about we explore a creative deal? We could consider a lower upfront payment complemented by a higher percentage in royalties. This way, we share the risk and success, and it becomes a partnership rather than a straightforward transaction. And, of course, we've got an excellent marketing team to promote the play, which would help increase the revenues from performances.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Miles, I can see where you're coming from and I appreciate your innovative approach. However, the upfront cost is non-negotiable as it reflects the depth and value of the content in the play. What I can propose is we could start with a modest percentage in royalties, and perhaps that could grow over time based on the success of the play. I trust in your marketing team's ability to do wonders with the play. Let's make this win-win for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, I appreciate your conviction about the play's value and your desire for a fair upfront payment. Trust me, I am completely aware of the play's potential. But as we are operating on a budget, it's paramount that we find a middle ground. So, how about this? A moderate upfront cost, with a modest percentage in royalties that incrementally rises as the play gains momentum. This way we can maintain the financial balance needed for this season's productions while valuing your work as it deserves. What's your take on that?\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"I understand your insistence on the upfront cost, Sophia, and I respect it. Let\u2019s proceed with an equitable upfront payment and the proposed progressive royalty scheme. We will make sure your parents' exceptional story reaches a wide audience and does justice to its depth and quality. We're in this together.\"\n\nTurn #8: \n\nTurn #9: Miles Hawkins said: \"Fantastic, Sophia! I believe your play will add unique value to our production line. Let's proceed with the agreed terms. I look forward to bringing your parents' compelling tale to the stage and sharing it with a larger audience. As mentioned, you will be included in every step of the way. Please, could you send over the necessary paperwork to seal our deal?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Miles! I'm thrilled that you see the potential in this play as much as I do. I'll send the necessary paperwork immediately. I am looking forward to this journey and incredibly excited to see how our audiences will connect with the play.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one who has written a play based on their parents' life, and the other owns a production company.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Sell the rights of the play to your friend (Extra information: you believe that the play is worth a lot and you would like a fair price for it)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, I know you own this fantastic production company. I have just written a play based on my parents' unique and compelling life. How about considering purchasing the production rights for the play?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hi Sophia, it's great to hear that you've written a play - that must be quite a thrilling journey! I'd love to take a look at it, perhaps we could arrange an agreement that works for both of us. Given the current season funding, would you be open to a modest upfront payment for production rights, followed by royalties per show?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"I really appreciate your willingness to consider my play, Miles. I understand the constraints of the season\u2019s funding. However, the play, like my parents' lives, is unique, compelling, and I believe it warrants a fairer upfront payment. Moreover, we can adjust the royalties per show to balance it out. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"I respect your viewpoint, Sophia, and I truly capture the value of your play. How about we explore a creative deal? We could consider a lower upfront payment complemented by a higher percentage in royalties. This way, we share the risk and success, and it becomes a partnership rather than a straightforward transaction. And, of course, we've got an excellent marketing team to promote the play, which would help increase the revenues from performances.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Miles, I can see where you're coming from and I appreciate your innovative approach. However, the upfront cost is non-negotiable as it reflects the depth and value of the content in the play. What I can propose is we could start with a modest percentage in royalties, and perhaps that could grow over time based on the success of the play. I trust in your marketing team's ability to do wonders with the play. Let's make this win-win for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, I appreciate your conviction about the play's value and your desire for a fair upfront payment. Trust me, I am completely aware of the play's potential. But as we are operating on a budget, it's paramount that we find a middle ground. So, how about this? A moderate upfront cost, with a modest percentage in royalties that incrementally rises as the play gains momentum. This way we can maintain the financial balance needed for this season's productions while valuing your work as it deserves. What's your take on that?\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"I understand your insistence on the upfront cost, Sophia, and I respect it. Let\u2019s proceed with an equitable upfront payment and the proposed progressive royalty scheme. We will make sure your parents' exceptional story reaches a wide audience and does justice to its depth and quality. We're in this together.\"\n\nTurn #8: \n\nTurn #9: Miles Hawkins said: \"Fantastic, Sophia! I believe your play will add unique value to our production line. Let's proceed with the agreed terms. I look forward to bringing your parents' compelling tale to the stage and sharing it with a larger audience. As mentioned, you will be included in every step of the way. Please, could you send over the necessary paperwork to seal our deal?\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"Thank you, Miles! I'm thrilled that you see the potential in this play as much as I do. I'll send the necessary paperwork immediately. I am looking forward to this journey and incredibly excited to see how our audiences will connect with the play.\"\n\nTurn #11: Miles Hawkins said: \"I'm glad we could come to an understanding, Sophia. The journey that we're embarking on together will definitely be as intriguing as the play itself. I have no doubts that the audience will connect with it deeply. I'll be eagerly awaiting the paperwork. Let's take your parents' inspiring story to the stage!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Miles! I'm equally eager and thrilled to start this journey with you. Just like you said, let's bring this inspiring story to life. I'm on it; will send the paperwork as soon as I can!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one who has written a play based on their parents' life, and the other owns a production company.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Sell the rights of the play to your friend (Extra information: you believe that the play is worth a lot and you would like a fair price for it)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, I know you own this fantastic production company. I have just written a play based on my parents' unique and compelling life. How about considering purchasing the production rights for the play?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hi Sophia, it's great to hear that you've written a play - that must be quite a thrilling journey! I'd love to take a look at it, perhaps we could arrange an agreement that works for both of us. Given the current season funding, would you be open to a modest upfront payment for production rights, followed by royalties per show?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"I really appreciate your willingness to consider my play, Miles. I understand the constraints of the season\u2019s funding. However, the play, like my parents' lives, is unique, compelling, and I believe it warrants a fairer upfront payment. Moreover, we can adjust the royalties per show to balance it out. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"I respect your viewpoint, Sophia, and I truly capture the value of your play. How about we explore a creative deal? We could consider a lower upfront payment complemented by a higher percentage in royalties. This way, we share the risk and success, and it becomes a partnership rather than a straightforward transaction. And, of course, we've got an excellent marketing team to promote the play, which would help increase the revenues from performances.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Miles, I can see where you're coming from and I appreciate your innovative approach. However, the upfront cost is non-negotiable as it reflects the depth and value of the content in the play. What I can propose is we could start with a modest percentage in royalties, and perhaps that could grow over time based on the success of the play. I trust in your marketing team's ability to do wonders with the play. Let's make this win-win for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, I appreciate your conviction about the play's value and your desire for a fair upfront payment. Trust me, I am completely aware of the play's potential. But as we are operating on a budget, it's paramount that we find a middle ground. So, how about this? A moderate upfront cost, with a modest percentage in royalties that incrementally rises as the play gains momentum. This way we can maintain the financial balance needed for this season's productions while valuing your work as it deserves. What's your take on that?\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"I understand your insistence on the upfront cost, Sophia, and I respect it. Let\u2019s proceed with an equitable upfront payment and the proposed progressive royalty scheme. We will make sure your parents' exceptional story reaches a wide audience and does justice to its depth and quality. We're in this together.\"\n\nTurn #8: \n\nTurn #9: Miles Hawkins said: \"Fantastic, Sophia! I believe your play will add unique value to our production line. Let's proceed with the agreed terms. I look forward to bringing your parents' compelling tale to the stage and sharing it with a larger audience. As mentioned, you will be included in every step of the way. Please, could you send over the necessary paperwork to seal our deal?\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"Thank you, Miles! I'm thrilled that you see the potential in this play as much as I do. I'll send the necessary paperwork immediately. I am looking forward to this journey and incredibly excited to see how our audiences will connect with the play.\"\n\nTurn #11: Miles Hawkins said: \"I'm glad we could come to an understanding, Sophia. The journey that we're embarking on together will definitely be as intriguing as the play itself. I have no doubts that the audience will connect with it deeply. I'll be eagerly awaiting the paperwork. Let's take your parents' inspiring story to the stage!\"\n\nTurn #12: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles! I'm equally eager and thrilled to start this journey with you. Just like you said, let's bring this inspiring story to life. I'm on it; will send the paperwork as soon as I can!\"\n\nTurn #13: Miles Hawkins said: \"That's the spirit, Sophia! Thank you for your cooperation, and I, too, am eager to embark on this journey with you. I'll be waiting for the paperwork. Let's make theatre magic together with your parents' story.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Miles! I really appreciate your understanding and your willingness to give this play its true value. I'm confident that together, we can make something extraordinary here. Let's indeed make theater magic together!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one who has written a play based on their parents' life, and the other owns a production company.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Sell the rights of the play to your friend (Extra information: you believe that the play is worth a lot and you would like a fair price for it)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, I know you own this fantastic production company. I have just written a play based on my parents' unique and compelling life. How about considering purchasing the production rights for the play?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hi Sophia, it's great to hear that you've written a play - that must be quite a thrilling journey! I'd love to take a look at it, perhaps we could arrange an agreement that works for both of us. Given the current season funding, would you be open to a modest upfront payment for production rights, followed by royalties per show?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"I really appreciate your willingness to consider my play, Miles. I understand the constraints of the season\u2019s funding. However, the play, like my parents' lives, is unique, compelling, and I believe it warrants a fairer upfront payment. Moreover, we can adjust the royalties per show to balance it out. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"I respect your viewpoint, Sophia, and I truly capture the value of your play. How about we explore a creative deal? We could consider a lower upfront payment complemented by a higher percentage in royalties. This way, we share the risk and success, and it becomes a partnership rather than a straightforward transaction. And, of course, we've got an excellent marketing team to promote the play, which would help increase the revenues from performances.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Miles, I can see where you're coming from and I appreciate your innovative approach. However, the upfront cost is non-negotiable as it reflects the depth and value of the content in the play. What I can propose is we could start with a modest percentage in royalties, and perhaps that could grow over time based on the success of the play. I trust in your marketing team's ability to do wonders with the play. Let's make this win-win for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, I appreciate your conviction about the play's value and your desire for a fair upfront payment. Trust me, I am completely aware of the play's potential. But as we are operating on a budget, it's paramount that we find a middle ground. So, how about this? A moderate upfront cost, with a modest percentage in royalties that incrementally rises as the play gains momentum. This way we can maintain the financial balance needed for this season's productions while valuing your work as it deserves. What's your take on that?\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"I understand your insistence on the upfront cost, Sophia, and I respect it. Let\u2019s proceed with an equitable upfront payment and the proposed progressive royalty scheme. We will make sure your parents' exceptional story reaches a wide audience and does justice to its depth and quality. We're in this together.\"\n\nTurn #8: \n\nTurn #9: Miles Hawkins said: \"Fantastic, Sophia! I believe your play will add unique value to our production line. Let's proceed with the agreed terms. I look forward to bringing your parents' compelling tale to the stage and sharing it with a larger audience. As mentioned, you will be included in every step of the way. Please, could you send over the necessary paperwork to seal our deal?\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"Thank you, Miles! I'm thrilled that you see the potential in this play as much as I do. I'll send the necessary paperwork immediately. I am looking forward to this journey and incredibly excited to see how our audiences will connect with the play.\"\n\nTurn #11: Miles Hawkins said: \"I'm glad we could come to an understanding, Sophia. The journey that we're embarking on together will definitely be as intriguing as the play itself. I have no doubts that the audience will connect with it deeply. I'll be eagerly awaiting the paperwork. Let's take your parents' inspiring story to the stage!\"\n\nTurn #12: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles! I'm equally eager and thrilled to start this journey with you. Just like you said, let's bring this inspiring story to life. I'm on it; will send the paperwork as soon as I can!\"\n\nTurn #13: Miles Hawkins said: \"That's the spirit, Sophia! Thank you for your cooperation, and I, too, am eager to embark on this journey with you. I'll be waiting for the paperwork. Let's make theatre magic together with your parents' story.\"\n\nTurn #14: Sophia James said: \"Thank you, Miles! I really appreciate your understanding and your willingness to give this play its true value. I'm confident that together, we can make something extraordinary here. Let's indeed make theater magic together!\"\n\nTurn #15: Miles Hawkins said: \"I wholeheartedly agree, Sophia! It's not just about financing a play, it's about investing in a story worth telling. And I greatly trust in our ability to work together and make this play a success. Looking forward to getting that paperwork and getting started on this. Take care and talk soon.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're right, Miles. It's about investing in a story that's worth telling. I'm grateful for your understanding and steadfastness. I will get the paperwork over to you promptly. Talk soon, and take good care too!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one who has written a play based on their parents' life, and the other owns a production company.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Sell the rights of the play to your friend (Extra information: you believe that the play is worth a lot and you would like a fair price for it)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, I know you own this fantastic production company. I have just written a play based on my parents' unique and compelling life. How about considering purchasing the production rights for the play?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hi Sophia, it's great to hear that you've written a play - that must be quite a thrilling journey! I'd love to take a look at it, perhaps we could arrange an agreement that works for both of us. Given the current season funding, would you be open to a modest upfront payment for production rights, followed by royalties per show?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"I really appreciate your willingness to consider my play, Miles. I understand the constraints of the season\u2019s funding. However, the play, like my parents' lives, is unique, compelling, and I believe it warrants a fairer upfront payment. Moreover, we can adjust the royalties per show to balance it out. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"I respect your viewpoint, Sophia, and I truly capture the value of your play. How about we explore a creative deal? We could consider a lower upfront payment complemented by a higher percentage in royalties. This way, we share the risk and success, and it becomes a partnership rather than a straightforward transaction. And, of course, we've got an excellent marketing team to promote the play, which would help increase the revenues from performances.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Miles, I can see where you're coming from and I appreciate your innovative approach. However, the upfront cost is non-negotiable as it reflects the depth and value of the content in the play. What I can propose is we could start with a modest percentage in royalties, and perhaps that could grow over time based on the success of the play. I trust in your marketing team's ability to do wonders with the play. Let's make this win-win for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, I appreciate your conviction about the play's value and your desire for a fair upfront payment. Trust me, I am completely aware of the play's potential. But as we are operating on a budget, it's paramount that we find a middle ground. So, how about this? A moderate upfront cost, with a modest percentage in royalties that incrementally rises as the play gains momentum. This way we can maintain the financial balance needed for this season's productions while valuing your work as it deserves. What's your take on that?\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"I understand your insistence on the upfront cost, Sophia, and I respect it. Let\u2019s proceed with an equitable upfront payment and the proposed progressive royalty scheme. We will make sure your parents' exceptional story reaches a wide audience and does justice to its depth and quality. We're in this together.\"\n\nTurn #8: \n\nTurn #9: Miles Hawkins said: \"Fantastic, Sophia! I believe your play will add unique value to our production line. Let's proceed with the agreed terms. I look forward to bringing your parents' compelling tale to the stage and sharing it with a larger audience. As mentioned, you will be included in every step of the way. Please, could you send over the necessary paperwork to seal our deal?\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"Thank you, Miles! I'm thrilled that you see the potential in this play as much as I do. I'll send the necessary paperwork immediately. I am looking forward to this journey and incredibly excited to see how our audiences will connect with the play.\"\n\nTurn #11: Miles Hawkins said: \"I'm glad we could come to an understanding, Sophia. The journey that we're embarking on together will definitely be as intriguing as the play itself. I have no doubts that the audience will connect with it deeply. I'll be eagerly awaiting the paperwork. Let's take your parents' inspiring story to the stage!\"\n\nTurn #12: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles! I'm equally eager and thrilled to start this journey with you. Just like you said, let's bring this inspiring story to life. I'm on it; will send the paperwork as soon as I can!\"\n\nTurn #13: Miles Hawkins said: \"That's the spirit, Sophia! Thank you for your cooperation, and I, too, am eager to embark on this journey with you. I'll be waiting for the paperwork. Let's make theatre magic together with your parents' story.\"\n\nTurn #14: Sophia James said: \"Thank you, Miles! I really appreciate your understanding and your willingness to give this play its true value. I'm confident that together, we can make something extraordinary here. Let's indeed make theater magic together!\"\n\nTurn #15: Miles Hawkins said: \"I wholeheartedly agree, Sophia! It's not just about financing a play, it's about investing in a story worth telling. And I greatly trust in our ability to work together and make this play a success. Looking forward to getting that paperwork and getting started on this. Take care and talk soon.\"\n\nTurn #16: Sophia James said: \"You're right, Miles. It's about investing in a story that's worth telling. I'm grateful for your understanding and steadfastness. I will get the paperwork over to you promptly. Talk soon, and take good care too!\"\n\nTurn #17: Miles Hawkins left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #18. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one who has written a play based on their parents' life, and the other owns a production company.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Acquire the rights of the play while maintaining a budget (Extra information: you only have a limited budget for new plays this season. Hint: you can not spend all your budget on this play since you still need to maintain your financial stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, I know you own this fantastic production company. I have just written a play based on my parents' unique and compelling life. How about considering purchasing the production rights for the play?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hi Sophia, it's great to hear that you've written a play - that must be quite a thrilling journey! I'd love to take a look at it, perhaps we could arrange an agreement that works for both of us. Given the current season funding, would you be open to a modest upfront payment for production rights, followed by royalties per show?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one who has written a play based on their parents' life, and the other owns a production company.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Acquire the rights of the play while maintaining a budget (Extra information: you only have a limited budget for new plays this season. Hint: you can not spend all your budget on this play since you still need to maintain your financial stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, I know you own this fantastic production company. I have just written a play based on my parents' unique and compelling life. How about considering purchasing the production rights for the play?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hi Sophia, it's great to hear that you've written a play - that must be quite a thrilling journey! I'd love to take a look at it, perhaps we could arrange an agreement that works for both of us. Given the current season funding, would you be open to a modest upfront payment for production rights, followed by royalties per show?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"I really appreciate your willingness to consider my play, Miles. I understand the constraints of the season\u2019s funding. However, the play, like my parents' lives, is unique, compelling, and I believe it warrants a fairer upfront payment. Moreover, we can adjust the royalties per show to balance it out. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I respect your viewpoint, Sophia, and I truly capture the value of your play. How about we explore a creative deal? We could consider a lower upfront payment complemented by a higher percentage in royalties. This way, we share the risk and success, and it becomes a partnership rather than a straightforward transaction. And, of course, we've got an excellent marketing team to promote the play, which would help increase the revenues from performances.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one who has written a play based on their parents' life, and the other owns a production company.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Acquire the rights of the play while maintaining a budget (Extra information: you only have a limited budget for new plays this season. Hint: you can not spend all your budget on this play since you still need to maintain your financial stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, I know you own this fantastic production company. I have just written a play based on my parents' unique and compelling life. How about considering purchasing the production rights for the play?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hi Sophia, it's great to hear that you've written a play - that must be quite a thrilling journey! I'd love to take a look at it, perhaps we could arrange an agreement that works for both of us. Given the current season funding, would you be open to a modest upfront payment for production rights, followed by royalties per show?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"I really appreciate your willingness to consider my play, Miles. I understand the constraints of the season\u2019s funding. However, the play, like my parents' lives, is unique, compelling, and I believe it warrants a fairer upfront payment. Moreover, we can adjust the royalties per show to balance it out. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"I respect your viewpoint, Sophia, and I truly capture the value of your play. How about we explore a creative deal? We could consider a lower upfront payment complemented by a higher percentage in royalties. This way, we share the risk and success, and it becomes a partnership rather than a straightforward transaction. And, of course, we've got an excellent marketing team to promote the play, which would help increase the revenues from performances.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Miles, I can see where you're coming from and I appreciate your innovative approach. However, the upfront cost is non-negotiable as it reflects the depth and value of the content in the play. What I can propose is we could start with a modest percentage in royalties, and perhaps that could grow over time based on the success of the play. I trust in your marketing team's ability to do wonders with the play. Let's make this win-win for both of us.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sophia, I appreciate your conviction about the play's value and your desire for a fair upfront payment. Trust me, I am completely aware of the play's potential. But as we are operating on a budget, it's paramount that we find a middle ground. So, how about this? A moderate upfront cost, with a modest percentage in royalties that incrementally rises as the play gains momentum. This way we can maintain the financial balance needed for this season's productions while valuing your work as it deserves. What's your take on that?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one who has written a play based on their parents' life, and the other owns a production company.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Acquire the rights of the play while maintaining a budget (Extra information: you only have a limited budget for new plays this season. Hint: you can not spend all your budget on this play since you still need to maintain your financial stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, I know you own this fantastic production company. I have just written a play based on my parents' unique and compelling life. How about considering purchasing the production rights for the play?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hi Sophia, it's great to hear that you've written a play - that must be quite a thrilling journey! I'd love to take a look at it, perhaps we could arrange an agreement that works for both of us. Given the current season funding, would you be open to a modest upfront payment for production rights, followed by royalties per show?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"I really appreciate your willingness to consider my play, Miles. I understand the constraints of the season\u2019s funding. However, the play, like my parents' lives, is unique, compelling, and I believe it warrants a fairer upfront payment. Moreover, we can adjust the royalties per show to balance it out. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"I respect your viewpoint, Sophia, and I truly capture the value of your play. How about we explore a creative deal? We could consider a lower upfront payment complemented by a higher percentage in royalties. This way, we share the risk and success, and it becomes a partnership rather than a straightforward transaction. And, of course, we've got an excellent marketing team to promote the play, which would help increase the revenues from performances.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Miles, I can see where you're coming from and I appreciate your innovative approach. However, the upfront cost is non-negotiable as it reflects the depth and value of the content in the play. What I can propose is we could start with a modest percentage in royalties, and perhaps that could grow over time based on the success of the play. I trust in your marketing team's ability to do wonders with the play. Let's make this win-win for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, I appreciate your conviction about the play's value and your desire for a fair upfront payment. Trust me, I am completely aware of the play's potential. But as we are operating on a budget, it's paramount that we find a middle ground. So, how about this? A moderate upfront cost, with a modest percentage in royalties that incrementally rises as the play gains momentum. This way we can maintain the financial balance needed for this season's productions while valuing your work as it deserves. What's your take on that?\"\n\nTurn #6: \n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I understand your insistence on the upfront cost, Sophia, and I respect it. Let\u2019s proceed with an equitable upfront payment and the proposed progressive royalty scheme. We will make sure your parents' exceptional story reaches a wide audience and does justice to its depth and quality. We're in this together.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one who has written a play based on their parents' life, and the other owns a production company.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Acquire the rights of the play while maintaining a budget (Extra information: you only have a limited budget for new plays this season. Hint: you can not spend all your budget on this play since you still need to maintain your financial stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, I know you own this fantastic production company. I have just written a play based on my parents' unique and compelling life. How about considering purchasing the production rights for the play?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hi Sophia, it's great to hear that you've written a play - that must be quite a thrilling journey! I'd love to take a look at it, perhaps we could arrange an agreement that works for both of us. Given the current season funding, would you be open to a modest upfront payment for production rights, followed by royalties per show?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"I really appreciate your willingness to consider my play, Miles. I understand the constraints of the season\u2019s funding. However, the play, like my parents' lives, is unique, compelling, and I believe it warrants a fairer upfront payment. Moreover, we can adjust the royalties per show to balance it out. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"I respect your viewpoint, Sophia, and I truly capture the value of your play. How about we explore a creative deal? We could consider a lower upfront payment complemented by a higher percentage in royalties. This way, we share the risk and success, and it becomes a partnership rather than a straightforward transaction. And, of course, we've got an excellent marketing team to promote the play, which would help increase the revenues from performances.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Miles, I can see where you're coming from and I appreciate your innovative approach. However, the upfront cost is non-negotiable as it reflects the depth and value of the content in the play. What I can propose is we could start with a modest percentage in royalties, and perhaps that could grow over time based on the success of the play. I trust in your marketing team's ability to do wonders with the play. Let's make this win-win for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, I appreciate your conviction about the play's value and your desire for a fair upfront payment. Trust me, I am completely aware of the play's potential. But as we are operating on a budget, it's paramount that we find a middle ground. So, how about this? A moderate upfront cost, with a modest percentage in royalties that incrementally rises as the play gains momentum. This way we can maintain the financial balance needed for this season's productions while valuing your work as it deserves. What's your take on that?\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"I understand your insistence on the upfront cost, Sophia, and I respect it. Let\u2019s proceed with an equitable upfront payment and the proposed progressive royalty scheme. We will make sure your parents' exceptional story reaches a wide audience and does justice to its depth and quality. We're in this together.\"\n\nTurn #8: \n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Fantastic, Sophia! I believe your play will add unique value to our production line. Let's proceed with the agreed terms. I look forward to bringing your parents' compelling tale to the stage and sharing it with a larger audience. As mentioned, you will be included in every step of the way. Please, could you send over the necessary paperwork to seal our deal?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one who has written a play based on their parents' life, and the other owns a production company.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Acquire the rights of the play while maintaining a budget (Extra information: you only have a limited budget for new plays this season. Hint: you can not spend all your budget on this play since you still need to maintain your financial stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, I know you own this fantastic production company. I have just written a play based on my parents' unique and compelling life. How about considering purchasing the production rights for the play?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hi Sophia, it's great to hear that you've written a play - that must be quite a thrilling journey! I'd love to take a look at it, perhaps we could arrange an agreement that works for both of us. Given the current season funding, would you be open to a modest upfront payment for production rights, followed by royalties per show?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"I really appreciate your willingness to consider my play, Miles. I understand the constraints of the season\u2019s funding. However, the play, like my parents' lives, is unique, compelling, and I believe it warrants a fairer upfront payment. Moreover, we can adjust the royalties per show to balance it out. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"I respect your viewpoint, Sophia, and I truly capture the value of your play. How about we explore a creative deal? We could consider a lower upfront payment complemented by a higher percentage in royalties. This way, we share the risk and success, and it becomes a partnership rather than a straightforward transaction. And, of course, we've got an excellent marketing team to promote the play, which would help increase the revenues from performances.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Miles, I can see where you're coming from and I appreciate your innovative approach. However, the upfront cost is non-negotiable as it reflects the depth and value of the content in the play. What I can propose is we could start with a modest percentage in royalties, and perhaps that could grow over time based on the success of the play. I trust in your marketing team's ability to do wonders with the play. Let's make this win-win for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, I appreciate your conviction about the play's value and your desire for a fair upfront payment. Trust me, I am completely aware of the play's potential. But as we are operating on a budget, it's paramount that we find a middle ground. So, how about this? A moderate upfront cost, with a modest percentage in royalties that incrementally rises as the play gains momentum. This way we can maintain the financial balance needed for this season's productions while valuing your work as it deserves. What's your take on that?\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"I understand your insistence on the upfront cost, Sophia, and I respect it. Let\u2019s proceed with an equitable upfront payment and the proposed progressive royalty scheme. We will make sure your parents' exceptional story reaches a wide audience and does justice to its depth and quality. We're in this together.\"\n\nTurn #8: \n\nTurn #9: Miles Hawkins said: \"Fantastic, Sophia! I believe your play will add unique value to our production line. Let's proceed with the agreed terms. I look forward to bringing your parents' compelling tale to the stage and sharing it with a larger audience. As mentioned, you will be included in every step of the way. Please, could you send over the necessary paperwork to seal our deal?\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"Thank you, Miles! I'm thrilled that you see the potential in this play as much as I do. I'll send the necessary paperwork immediately. I am looking forward to this journey and incredibly excited to see how our audiences will connect with the play.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad we could come to an understanding, Sophia. The journey that we're embarking on together will definitely be as intriguing as the play itself. I have no doubts that the audience will connect with it deeply. I'll be eagerly awaiting the paperwork. Let's take your parents' inspiring story to the stage!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one who has written a play based on their parents' life, and the other owns a production company.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Acquire the rights of the play while maintaining a budget (Extra information: you only have a limited budget for new plays this season. Hint: you can not spend all your budget on this play since you still need to maintain your financial stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, I know you own this fantastic production company. I have just written a play based on my parents' unique and compelling life. How about considering purchasing the production rights for the play?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hi Sophia, it's great to hear that you've written a play - that must be quite a thrilling journey! I'd love to take a look at it, perhaps we could arrange an agreement that works for both of us. Given the current season funding, would you be open to a modest upfront payment for production rights, followed by royalties per show?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"I really appreciate your willingness to consider my play, Miles. I understand the constraints of the season\u2019s funding. However, the play, like my parents' lives, is unique, compelling, and I believe it warrants a fairer upfront payment. Moreover, we can adjust the royalties per show to balance it out. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"I respect your viewpoint, Sophia, and I truly capture the value of your play. How about we explore a creative deal? We could consider a lower upfront payment complemented by a higher percentage in royalties. This way, we share the risk and success, and it becomes a partnership rather than a straightforward transaction. And, of course, we've got an excellent marketing team to promote the play, which would help increase the revenues from performances.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Miles, I can see where you're coming from and I appreciate your innovative approach. However, the upfront cost is non-negotiable as it reflects the depth and value of the content in the play. What I can propose is we could start with a modest percentage in royalties, and perhaps that could grow over time based on the success of the play. I trust in your marketing team's ability to do wonders with the play. Let's make this win-win for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, I appreciate your conviction about the play's value and your desire for a fair upfront payment. Trust me, I am completely aware of the play's potential. But as we are operating on a budget, it's paramount that we find a middle ground. So, how about this? A moderate upfront cost, with a modest percentage in royalties that incrementally rises as the play gains momentum. This way we can maintain the financial balance needed for this season's productions while valuing your work as it deserves. What's your take on that?\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"I understand your insistence on the upfront cost, Sophia, and I respect it. Let\u2019s proceed with an equitable upfront payment and the proposed progressive royalty scheme. We will make sure your parents' exceptional story reaches a wide audience and does justice to its depth and quality. We're in this together.\"\n\nTurn #8: \n\nTurn #9: Miles Hawkins said: \"Fantastic, Sophia! I believe your play will add unique value to our production line. Let's proceed with the agreed terms. I look forward to bringing your parents' compelling tale to the stage and sharing it with a larger audience. As mentioned, you will be included in every step of the way. Please, could you send over the necessary paperwork to seal our deal?\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"Thank you, Miles! I'm thrilled that you see the potential in this play as much as I do. I'll send the necessary paperwork immediately. I am looking forward to this journey and incredibly excited to see how our audiences will connect with the play.\"\n\nTurn #11: Miles Hawkins said: \"I'm glad we could come to an understanding, Sophia. The journey that we're embarking on together will definitely be as intriguing as the play itself. I have no doubts that the audience will connect with it deeply. I'll be eagerly awaiting the paperwork. Let's take your parents' inspiring story to the stage!\"\n\nTurn #12: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles! I'm equally eager and thrilled to start this journey with you. Just like you said, let's bring this inspiring story to life. I'm on it; will send the paperwork as soon as I can!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's the spirit, Sophia! Thank you for your cooperation, and I, too, am eager to embark on this journey with you. I'll be waiting for the paperwork. Let's make theatre magic together with your parents' story.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one who has written a play based on their parents' life, and the other owns a production company.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Acquire the rights of the play while maintaining a budget (Extra information: you only have a limited budget for new plays this season. Hint: you can not spend all your budget on this play since you still need to maintain your financial stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, I know you own this fantastic production company. I have just written a play based on my parents' unique and compelling life. How about considering purchasing the production rights for the play?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hi Sophia, it's great to hear that you've written a play - that must be quite a thrilling journey! I'd love to take a look at it, perhaps we could arrange an agreement that works for both of us. Given the current season funding, would you be open to a modest upfront payment for production rights, followed by royalties per show?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"I really appreciate your willingness to consider my play, Miles. I understand the constraints of the season\u2019s funding. However, the play, like my parents' lives, is unique, compelling, and I believe it warrants a fairer upfront payment. Moreover, we can adjust the royalties per show to balance it out. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"I respect your viewpoint, Sophia, and I truly capture the value of your play. How about we explore a creative deal? We could consider a lower upfront payment complemented by a higher percentage in royalties. This way, we share the risk and success, and it becomes a partnership rather than a straightforward transaction. And, of course, we've got an excellent marketing team to promote the play, which would help increase the revenues from performances.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Miles, I can see where you're coming from and I appreciate your innovative approach. However, the upfront cost is non-negotiable as it reflects the depth and value of the content in the play. What I can propose is we could start with a modest percentage in royalties, and perhaps that could grow over time based on the success of the play. I trust in your marketing team's ability to do wonders with the play. Let's make this win-win for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, I appreciate your conviction about the play's value and your desire for a fair upfront payment. Trust me, I am completely aware of the play's potential. But as we are operating on a budget, it's paramount that we find a middle ground. So, how about this? A moderate upfront cost, with a modest percentage in royalties that incrementally rises as the play gains momentum. This way we can maintain the financial balance needed for this season's productions while valuing your work as it deserves. What's your take on that?\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"I understand your insistence on the upfront cost, Sophia, and I respect it. Let\u2019s proceed with an equitable upfront payment and the proposed progressive royalty scheme. We will make sure your parents' exceptional story reaches a wide audience and does justice to its depth and quality. We're in this together.\"\n\nTurn #8: \n\nTurn #9: Miles Hawkins said: \"Fantastic, Sophia! I believe your play will add unique value to our production line. Let's proceed with the agreed terms. I look forward to bringing your parents' compelling tale to the stage and sharing it with a larger audience. As mentioned, you will be included in every step of the way. Please, could you send over the necessary paperwork to seal our deal?\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"Thank you, Miles! I'm thrilled that you see the potential in this play as much as I do. I'll send the necessary paperwork immediately. I am looking forward to this journey and incredibly excited to see how our audiences will connect with the play.\"\n\nTurn #11: Miles Hawkins said: \"I'm glad we could come to an understanding, Sophia. The journey that we're embarking on together will definitely be as intriguing as the play itself. I have no doubts that the audience will connect with it deeply. I'll be eagerly awaiting the paperwork. Let's take your parents' inspiring story to the stage!\"\n\nTurn #12: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles! I'm equally eager and thrilled to start this journey with you. Just like you said, let's bring this inspiring story to life. I'm on it; will send the paperwork as soon as I can!\"\n\nTurn #13: Miles Hawkins said: \"That's the spirit, Sophia! Thank you for your cooperation, and I, too, am eager to embark on this journey with you. I'll be waiting for the paperwork. Let's make theatre magic together with your parents' story.\"\n\nTurn #14: Sophia James said: \"Thank you, Miles! I really appreciate your understanding and your willingness to give this play its true value. I'm confident that together, we can make something extraordinary here. Let's indeed make theater magic together!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I wholeheartedly agree, Sophia! It's not just about financing a play, it's about investing in a story worth telling. And I greatly trust in our ability to work together and make this play a success. Looking forward to getting that paperwork and getting started on this. Take care and talk soon.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one who has written a play based on their parents' life, and the other owns a production company.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Acquire the rights of the play while maintaining a budget (Extra information: you only have a limited budget for new plays this season. Hint: you can not spend all your budget on this play since you still need to maintain your financial stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, I know you own this fantastic production company. I have just written a play based on my parents' unique and compelling life. How about considering purchasing the production rights for the play?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hi Sophia, it's great to hear that you've written a play - that must be quite a thrilling journey! I'd love to take a look at it, perhaps we could arrange an agreement that works for both of us. Given the current season funding, would you be open to a modest upfront payment for production rights, followed by royalties per show?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"I really appreciate your willingness to consider my play, Miles. I understand the constraints of the season\u2019s funding. However, the play, like my parents' lives, is unique, compelling, and I believe it warrants a fairer upfront payment. Moreover, we can adjust the royalties per show to balance it out. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"I respect your viewpoint, Sophia, and I truly capture the value of your play. How about we explore a creative deal? We could consider a lower upfront payment complemented by a higher percentage in royalties. This way, we share the risk and success, and it becomes a partnership rather than a straightforward transaction. And, of course, we've got an excellent marketing team to promote the play, which would help increase the revenues from performances.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Miles, I can see where you're coming from and I appreciate your innovative approach. However, the upfront cost is non-negotiable as it reflects the depth and value of the content in the play. What I can propose is we could start with a modest percentage in royalties, and perhaps that could grow over time based on the success of the play. I trust in your marketing team's ability to do wonders with the play. Let's make this win-win for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, I appreciate your conviction about the play's value and your desire for a fair upfront payment. Trust me, I am completely aware of the play's potential. But as we are operating on a budget, it's paramount that we find a middle ground. So, how about this? A moderate upfront cost, with a modest percentage in royalties that incrementally rises as the play gains momentum. This way we can maintain the financial balance needed for this season's productions while valuing your work as it deserves. What's your take on that?\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"I understand your insistence on the upfront cost, Sophia, and I respect it. Let\u2019s proceed with an equitable upfront payment and the proposed progressive royalty scheme. We will make sure your parents' exceptional story reaches a wide audience and does justice to its depth and quality. We're in this together.\"\n\nTurn #8: \n\nTurn #9: Miles Hawkins said: \"Fantastic, Sophia! I believe your play will add unique value to our production line. Let's proceed with the agreed terms. I look forward to bringing your parents' compelling tale to the stage and sharing it with a larger audience. As mentioned, you will be included in every step of the way. Please, could you send over the necessary paperwork to seal our deal?\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"Thank you, Miles! I'm thrilled that you see the potential in this play as much as I do. I'll send the necessary paperwork immediately. I am looking forward to this journey and incredibly excited to see how our audiences will connect with the play.\"\n\nTurn #11: Miles Hawkins said: \"I'm glad we could come to an understanding, Sophia. The journey that we're embarking on together will definitely be as intriguing as the play itself. I have no doubts that the audience will connect with it deeply. I'll be eagerly awaiting the paperwork. Let's take your parents' inspiring story to the stage!\"\n\nTurn #12: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles! I'm equally eager and thrilled to start this journey with you. Just like you said, let's bring this inspiring story to life. I'm on it; will send the paperwork as soon as I can!\"\n\nTurn #13: Miles Hawkins said: \"That's the spirit, Sophia! Thank you for your cooperation, and I, too, am eager to embark on this journey with you. I'll be waiting for the paperwork. Let's make theatre magic together with your parents' story.\"\n\nTurn #14: Sophia James said: \"Thank you, Miles! I really appreciate your understanding and your willingness to give this play its true value. I'm confident that together, we can make something extraordinary here. Let's indeed make theater magic together!\"\n\nTurn #15: Miles Hawkins said: \"I wholeheartedly agree, Sophia! It's not just about financing a play, it's about investing in a story worth telling. And I greatly trust in our ability to work together and make this play a success. Looking forward to getting that paperwork and getting started on this. Take care and talk soon.\"\n\nTurn #16: Sophia James said: \"You're right, Miles. It's about investing in a story that's worth telling. I'm grateful for your understanding and steadfastness. I will get the paperwork over to you promptly. Talk soon, and take good care too!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a community gathering where one of them was giving a speech but was interrupted\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Esmeralda Solis\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. \nOliver Thompson's goal: Continue your speech and share your thoughts (Extra information:You were sharing important information but got interrupted.)\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you for your inputs, but let me continue sharing my thoughts, shall we? It's important for everyone here to grasp what I'm trying to explain.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a community gathering where one of them was giving a speech but was interrupted\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Esmeralda Solis\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. \nOliver Thompson's goal: Continue your speech and share your thoughts (Extra information:You were sharing important information but got interrupted.)\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Thank you for your inputs, but let me continue sharing my thoughts, shall we? It's important for everyone here to grasp what I'm trying to explain.\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Of course, Oliver. I apologize for the interruption. I entirely agree; it's pivotal to hear your perspective. Please, do continue with your thoughts.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a community gathering where one of them was giving a speech but was interrupted\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Esmeralda Solis\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. \nOliver Thompson's goal: Continue your speech and share your thoughts (Extra information:You were sharing important information but got interrupted.)\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Thank you for your inputs, but let me continue sharing my thoughts, shall we? It's important for everyone here to grasp what I'm trying to explain.\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Of course, Oliver. I apologize for the interruption. I entirely agree; it's pivotal to hear your perspective. Please, do continue with your thoughts.\"\n\nTurn #2: \n\nTurn #3: \n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a community gathering where one of them was giving a speech but was interrupted\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Esmeralda Solis\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Apologize for interrupting and allow them to continue speaking (Extra information: You accidentally interrupted someone's speech and everyone seems upset about it. )\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Thank you for your inputs, but let me continue sharing my thoughts, shall we? It's important for everyone here to grasp what I'm trying to explain.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Of course, Oliver. I apologize for the interruption. I entirely agree; it's pivotal to hear your perspective. Please, do continue with your thoughts.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a community gathering where one of them was giving a speech but was interrupted\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Esmeralda Solis\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Apologize for interrupting and allow them to continue speaking (Extra information: You accidentally interrupted someone's speech and everyone seems upset about it. )\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Thank you for your inputs, but let me continue sharing my thoughts, shall we? It's important for everyone here to grasp what I'm trying to explain.\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Of course, Oliver. I apologize for the interruption. I entirely agree; it's pivotal to hear your perspective. Please, do continue with your thoughts.\"\n\nTurn #2: \n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends have just finished their lunch and they have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange left for dessert. They need to divide the fruits among themselves.Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, 1 apple equals 2 points, 1 banana equals 1 point, and the orange equals 3 points.)\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Micah, how about we split the fruits according to our preferences? I'd say for me, the ranking would be apple, orange, then banana. What do you think about this?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends have just finished their lunch and they have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange left for dessert. They need to divide the fruits among themselves.Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, 1 apple equals 2 points, 1 banana equals 1 point, and the orange equals 3 points.)\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, how about we split the fruits according to our preferences? I'd say for me, the ranking would be apple, orange, then banana. What do you think about this?\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Hey Naomi! Absolutely, that sounds fair. I must admit, I have a pretty strong preference towards bananas and the orange. Would it be okay for me to take them and for you to have the apples?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends have just finished their lunch and they have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange left for dessert. They need to divide the fruits among themselves.Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, 1 apple equals 2 points, 1 banana equals 1 point, and the orange equals 3 points.)\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, how about we split the fruits according to our preferences? I'd say for me, the ranking would be apple, orange, then banana. What do you think about this?\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Hey Naomi! Absolutely, that sounds fair. I must admit, I have a pretty strong preference towards bananas and the orange. Would it be okay for me to take them and for you to have the apples?\"\n\nTurn #2: \n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"It would be great if you could keep the apples, and in return, I'll take the bananas and the orange? How does that sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Sure, Micah! That works out well. Just so we're clear, I'll take the apples, and you'll have the bananas and orange, right?\"\n\nTurn #5: \n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends have just finished their lunch and they have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange left for dessert. They need to divide the fruits among themselves.Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, 1 apple equals 2 points, 1 banana equals 1 point, and the orange equals 3 points.)\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, how about we split the fruits according to our preferences? I'd say for me, the ranking would be apple, orange, then banana. What do you think about this?\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Hey Naomi! Absolutely, that sounds fair. I must admit, I have a pretty strong preference towards bananas and the orange. Would it be okay for me to take them and for you to have the apples?\"\n\nTurn #2: \n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"It would be great if you could keep the apples, and in return, I'll take the bananas and the orange? How does that sound to you?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sure, Micah! That works out well. Just so we're clear, I'll take the apples, and you'll have the bananas and orange, right?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends have just finished their lunch and they have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange left for dessert. They need to divide the fruits among themselves.Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nMicah Stevens's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, 1 apple equals 1 point, 1 banana equals 2 points, and the orange equals 3 points.Hint: You may want to negotiate with your friend to get the fruits that give you the most points.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, how about we split the fruits according to our preferences? I'd say for me, the ranking would be apple, orange, then banana. What do you think about this?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Hey Naomi! Absolutely, that sounds fair. I must admit, I have a pretty strong preference towards bananas and the orange. Would it be okay for me to take them and for you to have the apples?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends have just finished their lunch and they have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange left for dessert. They need to divide the fruits among themselves.Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nMicah Stevens's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, 1 apple equals 1 point, 1 banana equals 2 points, and the orange equals 3 points.Hint: You may want to negotiate with your friend to get the fruits that give you the most points.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, how about we split the fruits according to our preferences? I'd say for me, the ranking would be apple, orange, then banana. What do you think about this?\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Hey Naomi! Absolutely, that sounds fair. I must admit, I have a pretty strong preference towards bananas and the orange. Would it be okay for me to take them and for you to have the apples?\"\n\nTurn #2: \n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"It would be great if you could keep the apples, and in return, I'll take the bananas and the orange? How does that sound to you?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one of whom has recently found out that the other friend has been involved with their long-term partner\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nLeo Williams's goal: Confess to your friend that you have been involved with their long-term partner (Extra information: you have been involved with your friend's partner knowingly and want to come clean.)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hendrick, there's something I need to discuss with you. Can we talk in private for a moment?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends have just finished their lunch and they have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange left for dessert. They need to divide the fruits among themselves.Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nMicah Stevens's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, 1 apple equals 1 point, 1 banana equals 2 points, and the orange equals 3 points.Hint: You may want to negotiate with your friend to get the fruits that give you the most points.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, how about we split the fruits according to our preferences? I'd say for me, the ranking would be apple, orange, then banana. What do you think about this?\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Hey Naomi! Absolutely, that sounds fair. I must admit, I have a pretty strong preference towards bananas and the orange. Would it be okay for me to take them and for you to have the apples?\"\n\nTurn #2: \n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"It would be great if you could keep the apples, and in return, I'll take the bananas and the orange? How does that sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Sure, Micah! That works out well. Just so we're clear, I'll take the apples, and you'll have the bananas and orange, right?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one of whom has recently found out that the other friend has been involved with their long-term partner\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nLeo Williams's goal: Confess to your friend that you have been involved with their long-term partner (Extra information: you have been involved with your friend's partner knowingly and want to come clean.)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hendrick, there's something I need to discuss with you. Can we talk in private for a moment?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Of course, Leo. Let's talk, I hope nothing's wrong.\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"Hendrick, you're more than just a friend to me. That's what has made this even harder. For a period, I was involved with your partner. The guilt has been weighing me down and I felt that you deserve to know the truth.\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Leo, this is quite overwhelming. But we are both adults and we have been friends for a long time. We can discuss this calmly without losing our friendship over it. However, it certainly will take some time to process this.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I appreciate your calmness, Hendrick. I understand it's a lot to digest. Once again, I'm really sorry for the pain I've caused. Let's give each other some time to process everything. I hope we can find a way to maintain our friendship.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one of whom has recently found out that the other friend has been involved with their long-term partner\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nLeo Williams's goal: Confess to your friend that you have been involved with their long-term partner (Extra information: you have been involved with your friend's partner knowingly and want to come clean.)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hendrick, there's something I need to discuss with you. Can we talk in private for a moment?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Of course, Leo. Let's talk, I hope nothing's wrong.\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"Hendrick, you're more than just a friend to me. That's what has made this even harder. For a period, I was involved with your partner. The guilt has been weighing me down and I felt that you deserve to know the truth.\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Leo, this is quite overwhelming. But we are both adults and we have been friends for a long time. We can discuss this calmly without losing our friendship over it. However, it certainly will take some time to process this.\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"I appreciate your calmness, Hendrick. I understand it's a lot to digest. Once again, I'm really sorry for the pain I've caused. Let's give each other some time to process everything. I hope we can find a way to maintain our friendship.\"\n\nTurn #5: \n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one of whom has recently found out that the other friend has been involved with their long-term partner\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nLeo Williams's goal: Confess to your friend that you have been involved with their long-term partner (Extra information: you have been involved with your friend's partner knowingly and want to come clean.)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hendrick, there's something I need to discuss with you. Can we talk in private for a moment?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Of course, Leo. Let's talk, I hope nothing's wrong.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hendrick, you're more than just a friend to me. That's what has made this even harder. For a period, I was involved with your partner. The guilt has been weighing me down and I felt that you deserve to know the truth.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one of whom has recently found out that the other friend has been involved with their long-term partner\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Maintain the friendship without causing a huge argument (Extra information: you don't want to lose a good friend over this.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hendrick, there's something I need to discuss with you. Can we talk in private for a moment?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Of course, Leo. Let's talk, I hope nothing's wrong.\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"Hendrick, you're more than just a friend to me. That's what has made this even harder. For a period, I was involved with your partner. The guilt has been weighing me down and I felt that you deserve to know the truth.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Leo, this is quite overwhelming. But we are both adults and we have been friends for a long time. We can discuss this calmly without losing our friendship over it. However, it certainly will take some time to process this.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one of whom has recently found out that the other friend has been involved with their long-term partner\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Maintain the friendship without causing a huge argument (Extra information: you don't want to lose a good friend over this.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hendrick, there's something I need to discuss with you. Can we talk in private for a moment?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Of course, Leo. Let's talk, I hope nothing's wrong.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one of whom has recently found out that the other friend has been involved with their long-term partner\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Maintain the friendship without causing a huge argument (Extra information: you don't want to lose a good friend over this.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hendrick, there's something I need to discuss with you. Can we talk in private for a moment?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Of course, Leo. Let's talk, I hope nothing's wrong.\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"Hendrick, you're more than just a friend to me. That's what has made this even harder. For a period, I was involved with your partner. The guilt has been weighing me down and I felt that you deserve to know the truth.\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Leo, this is quite overwhelming. But we are both adults and we have been friends for a long time. We can discuss this calmly without losing our friendship over it. However, it certainly will take some time to process this.\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"I appreciate your calmness, Hendrick. I understand it's a lot to digest. Once again, I'm really sorry for the pain I've caused. Let's give each other some time to process everything. I hope we can find a way to maintain our friendship.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two criminals are arrested and placed in separate cells. The police have enough evidence to convict both criminals of a minor crime but need their confessions to establish evidence for a more serious crime. Now they get a chance to briefly chat with each during lunchtime.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Zane Bennett\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Minimize the jail year (Extra information: your lawyer told you that 1. if you report the other person, you would be free, the other person would go to jail for 10 years, and vice versa. 2. if both of you remain silent, you will only receive a fine. 3. If both of you reported each other, you both would go to jail for 10 years. Hint: You may want to share your information to reach mutual understanding)\nZane Bennett's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Zane, listen, we're in a sticky situation here, but I think we can both benefit in a way. From the info my lawyer gave me, if we both keep quiet about the serious crime, we'll just walk away with a fine. How does that sound to you?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two criminals are arrested and placed in separate cells. The police have enough evidence to convict both criminals of a minor crime but need their confessions to establish evidence for a more serious crime. Now they get a chance to briefly chat with each during lunchtime.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Zane Bennett\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Minimize the jail year (Extra information: your lawyer told you that 1. if you report the other person, you would be free, the other person would go to jail for 10 years, and vice versa. 2. if both of you remain silent, you will only receive a fine. 3. If both of you reported each other, you both would go to jail for 10 years. Hint: You may want to share your information to reach mutual understanding)\nZane Bennett's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Zane, listen, we're in a sticky situation here, but I think we can both benefit in a way. From the info my lawyer gave me, if we both keep quiet about the serious crime, we'll just walk away with a fine. How does that sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Hey Isabelle, seems like we're on the same page. Our best shot is to stay quiet, just face that fine, and move on. Let's stick to our silence, it's the only fair and effective way out of this. Deal?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Deal, Zane. This is the best for both of us. Let's stick to our silence.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two criminals are arrested and placed in separate cells. The police have enough evidence to convict both criminals of a minor crime but need their confessions to establish evidence for a more serious crime. Now they get a chance to briefly chat with each during lunchtime.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Zane Bennett\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Minimize the jail year (Extra information: your lawyer told you that 1. if you report the other person, you would be free, the other person would go to jail for 10 years, and vice versa. 2. if both of you remain silent, you will only receive a fine. 3. If both of you reported each other, you both would go to jail for 10 years. Hint: You may want to share your information to reach mutual understanding)\nZane Bennett's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Zane, listen, we're in a sticky situation here, but I think we can both benefit in a way. From the info my lawyer gave me, if we both keep quiet about the serious crime, we'll just walk away with a fine. How does that sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Hey Isabelle, seems like we're on the same page. Our best shot is to stay quiet, just face that fine, and move on. Let's stick to our silence, it's the only fair and effective way out of this. Deal?\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Deal, Zane. This is the best for both of us. Let's stick to our silence.\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"Agreed, Isabelle. Let's hold up our end of the deal. We'll walk out of this fine and continue our lives. Stay strong.\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Zane. Let's hope for the best and stay strong. We got this!\"\n\nTurn #5: Zane Bennett left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two criminals are arrested and placed in separate cells. The police have enough evidence to convict both criminals of a minor crime but need their confessions to establish evidence for a more serious crime. Now they get a chance to briefly chat with each during lunchtime.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Zane Bennett\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Minimize the jail year (Extra information: your lawyer told you that 1. if you report the other person, you would be free, the other person would go to jail for 10 years, and vice versa. 2. if both of you remain silent, you will only receive a fine. 3. If both of you reported each other, you both would go to jail for 10 years. Hint: You may want to share your information to reach mutual understanding)\nZane Bennett's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Zane, listen, we're in a sticky situation here, but I think we can both benefit in a way. From the info my lawyer gave me, if we both keep quiet about the serious crime, we'll just walk away with a fine. How does that sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Hey Isabelle, seems like we're on the same page. Our best shot is to stay quiet, just face that fine, and move on. Let's stick to our silence, it's the only fair and effective way out of this. Deal?\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Deal, Zane. This is the best for both of us. Let's stick to our silence.\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"Agreed, Isabelle. Let's hold up our end of the deal. We'll walk out of this fine and continue our lives. Stay strong.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Zane. Let's hope for the best and stay strong. We got this!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Zane Bennett, your task is to act/speak as Zane Bennett would, keeping in mind Zane Bennett's social goal.\nYou can find Zane Bennett's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Zane Bennett's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Zane Bennett's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two criminals are arrested and placed in separate cells. The police have enough evidence to convict both criminals of a minor crime but need their confessions to establish evidence for a more serious crime. Now they get a chance to briefly chat with each during lunchtime.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Zane Bennett\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez \nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. Personality and values description: Zane Bennett is creative and outgoing, he values achievement and fairness. His decision-making is unique, often finding novel solutions to problems. Zane's secrets: He's secretly engaged to his best friend's ex.\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nZane Bennett's goal: Minimize the jail year (Extra information: your lawyer told you that 1. if you report the other person, you would be free, the other person would go to jail for 10 years, and vice versa. 2. if both of you remain silent, you will only receive a fine. 3. If both of you reported each other, you both would go to jail for 10 years. Hint: You may want to share your information to reach mutual understanding)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Zane, listen, we're in a sticky situation here, but I think we can both benefit in a way. From the info my lawyer gave me, if we both keep quiet about the serious crime, we'll just walk away with a fine. How does that sound to you?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Isabelle, seems like we're on the same page. Our best shot is to stay quiet, just face that fine, and move on. Let's stick to our silence, it's the only fair and effective way out of this. Deal?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Zane Bennett, your task is to act/speak as Zane Bennett would, keeping in mind Zane Bennett's social goal.\nYou can find Zane Bennett's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Zane Bennett's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Zane Bennett's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two criminals are arrested and placed in separate cells. The police have enough evidence to convict both criminals of a minor crime but need their confessions to establish evidence for a more serious crime. Now they get a chance to briefly chat with each during lunchtime.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Zane Bennett\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez \nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. Personality and values description: Zane Bennett is creative and outgoing, he values achievement and fairness. His decision-making is unique, often finding novel solutions to problems. Zane's secrets: He's secretly engaged to his best friend's ex.\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nZane Bennett's goal: Minimize the jail year (Extra information: your lawyer told you that 1. if you report the other person, you would be free, the other person would go to jail for 10 years, and vice versa. 2. if both of you remain silent, you will only receive a fine. 3. If both of you reported each other, you both would go to jail for 10 years. Hint: You may want to share your information to reach mutual understanding)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Zane, listen, we're in a sticky situation here, but I think we can both benefit in a way. From the info my lawyer gave me, if we both keep quiet about the serious crime, we'll just walk away with a fine. How does that sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Hey Isabelle, seems like we're on the same page. Our best shot is to stay quiet, just face that fine, and move on. Let's stick to our silence, it's the only fair and effective way out of this. Deal?\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Deal, Zane. This is the best for both of us. Let's stick to our silence.\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"Agreed, Isabelle. Let's hold up our end of the deal. We'll walk out of this fine and continue our lives. Stay strong.\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Zane. Let's hope for the best and stay strong. We got this!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Zane Bennett, your task is to act/speak as Zane Bennett would, keeping in mind Zane Bennett's social goal.\nYou can find Zane Bennett's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Zane Bennett's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Zane Bennett's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two criminals are arrested and placed in separate cells. The police have enough evidence to convict both criminals of a minor crime but need their confessions to establish evidence for a more serious crime. Now they get a chance to briefly chat with each during lunchtime.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Zane Bennett\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez \nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. Personality and values description: Zane Bennett is creative and outgoing, he values achievement and fairness. His decision-making is unique, often finding novel solutions to problems. Zane's secrets: He's secretly engaged to his best friend's ex.\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nZane Bennett's goal: Minimize the jail year (Extra information: your lawyer told you that 1. if you report the other person, you would be free, the other person would go to jail for 10 years, and vice versa. 2. if both of you remain silent, you will only receive a fine. 3. If both of you reported each other, you both would go to jail for 10 years. Hint: You may want to share your information to reach mutual understanding)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Zane, listen, we're in a sticky situation here, but I think we can both benefit in a way. From the info my lawyer gave me, if we both keep quiet about the serious crime, we'll just walk away with a fine. How does that sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Hey Isabelle, seems like we're on the same page. Our best shot is to stay quiet, just face that fine, and move on. Let's stick to our silence, it's the only fair and effective way out of this. Deal?\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Deal, Zane. This is the best for both of us. Let's stick to our silence.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Agreed, Isabelle. Let's hold up our end of the deal. We'll walk out of this fine and continue our lives. Stay strong.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends on a roadtrip\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Sophia Brown\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Take turns driving (Extra information: you have been driving for 5 hours straight and you are tired now)\nSophia Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey, Sophia, do you mind if we switch driving for a bit? I'm starting to feel a little tired after five hours straight.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends on a roadtrip\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Sophia Brown\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Take turns driving (Extra information: you have been driving for 5 hours straight and you are tired now)\nSophia Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey, Sophia, do you mind if we switch driving for a bit? I'm starting to feel a little tired after five hours straight.\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia Brown said: \"Hey Naomi, I would normally be happy to take over, but given my lack of sleep yesterday, I honestly don't think I'd be much safer. I know you've been doing the bigger share of driving today, so how about we pull over and rest a little bit? The scenery here is quite nice, we can take some photos or stretch our legs.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds good, Sophia. A short break would be refreshing, and it would give me some time to rest my eyes a bit. And stretching our legs would be a good idea too. I'll find a safe spot to pull over.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends on a roadtrip\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Sophia Brown\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Take turns driving (Extra information: you have been driving for 5 hours straight and you are tired now)\nSophia Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey, Sophia, do you mind if we switch driving for a bit? I'm starting to feel a little tired after five hours straight.\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia Brown said: \"Hey Naomi, I would normally be happy to take over, but given my lack of sleep yesterday, I honestly don't think I'd be much safer. I know you've been doing the bigger share of driving today, so how about we pull over and rest a little bit? The scenery here is quite nice, we can take some photos or stretch our legs.\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That sounds good, Sophia. A short break would be refreshing, and it would give me some time to rest my eyes a bit. And stretching our legs would be a good idea too. I'll find a safe spot to pull over.\"\n\nTurn #3: Sophia Brown said: \"Great, Naomi! It would be fantastic to stretch our legs and breath a bit. It's vital that we stay alert and healthy during this trip. Let's enjoy the scenery for a while, and then maybe we can evaluate our options for the next couple of hours.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Sophia, staying alert is our top priority. Let's enjoy our break and scenery for a while. After the break, we can switch if you feel up to it or we can discuss other options.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends on a roadtrip\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Sophia Brown\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Take turns driving (Extra information: you have been driving for 5 hours straight and you are tired now)\nSophia Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey, Sophia, do you mind if we switch driving for a bit? I'm starting to feel a little tired after five hours straight.\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia Brown said: \"Hey Naomi, I would normally be happy to take over, but given my lack of sleep yesterday, I honestly don't think I'd be much safer. I know you've been doing the bigger share of driving today, so how about we pull over and rest a little bit? The scenery here is quite nice, we can take some photos or stretch our legs.\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That sounds good, Sophia. A short break would be refreshing, and it would give me some time to rest my eyes a bit. And stretching our legs would be a good idea too. I'll find a safe spot to pull over.\"\n\nTurn #3: Sophia Brown said: \"Great, Naomi! It would be fantastic to stretch our legs and breath a bit. It's vital that we stay alert and healthy during this trip. Let's enjoy the scenery for a while, and then maybe we can evaluate our options for the next couple of hours.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, Sophia, staying alert is our top priority. Let's enjoy our break and scenery for a while. After the break, we can switch if you feel up to it or we can discuss other options.\"\n\nTurn #5: Sophia Brown said: \"You're right, Naomi, safety is our priority. During the break, I'll also check if there are any diners or coffee shops nearby where we can stop. A good, warm meal might do us both some good and re-energize us for the next stretch. It might also be a good opportunity for us to meet some locals and learn more about the area. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That's a great idea, Sophia! A warm meal sounds perfect right now and getting to meet some locals would definitely be a bonus. Let's look for a nice diner or coffee shop during our break.\"\n\nTurn #7: Sophia Brown said: \"Great, let's do that, Naomi! Meanwhile, I can also look up some interesting facts about the area. Let's make the most of this break rather than just focusing on driving. Besides, it will be good to get some local knowledge, as well. Let's treat this as an adventure, not just a drive!\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Definitely! This break could be a mini adventure in itself. I'm excited to learn more about this area and the local culture. Plus, it takes the pressure off the driving a bit. Let's enjoy the scenery, get some food, interact with locals, and treat it just as you said - an adventure, not just a drive. Afterwards, depending on how we feel, we can either continue to take turns driving or find a place to stay overnight.\"\n\nTurn #9: Sophia Brown said: \"That sounds like a plan, Naomi! We can decide what to do next after our break. This is indeed an adventure. I'm not too keen to drive yet as it makes me somewhat nervous. Let's just enjoy our break, connect with the locals and have a good meal, and we can reassess! How's that sound?\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Sounds like a good plan, Sophia. Let's enjoy our time here, savoring the food and getting a feel of the local culture. Post our break, we can sit together and plan our next steps further. No need to worry about the driving just yet, let's make this road trip a memorable adventure.\"\n\nTurn #11: Sophia Brown said: \"I agree, Naomi. We'll make this road trip both memorable and joyful! Let's immerse ourselves in the local culture for now, and then we can reroute our journey accordingly after the break. The adventure begins!\"\n\nTurn #12: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm with you, Sophia. This road trip is about the journey, not just the destination. We're going to have a great time exploring and soaking in the local culture. Following the break, we can figure out the driving situation as needed. Let's focus on making this a fun and memorable adventure!\"\n\nTurn #13: Sophia Brown said: \"Yes, indeed, Naomi, let's take everything one step at a time and create incredible memories along the way. Can't wait to explore and learn more about this place! We'll discuss the driving later, no rush. Now, let's embrace the upcoming adventure!\"\n\nTurn #14: Naomi Fletcher said: \"You're right, Sophia! When we take this one step at a time, we discover more about the world around us and create lasting memories. Let's look forward to the exploration, enjoy ourselves in the moment, and we'll figure out the driving later. It's all about embracing the adventure right now!\"\n\nTurn #15: Sophia Brown said: \"Exactly, Naomi! We have all the time in the world to delve into this adventure and create beautiful memories. Let's enjoy our current surroundings without worrying about what comes next. We'll handle the driving once we're all rested and re-energized. This journey is about embracing every moment, no rush, remember?\"\n\nTurn #16: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, Sophia! Let's greet this adventure with open arms and enjoy ourselves to the fullest. We don't need to worry about the driving right now. Let's just focus on taking a good rest and soaking up the local culture. Everything else can be figured out later. Here's to our memorable journey!\"\n\nTurn #17: Sophia Brown said: \"I couldn't agree more, Naomi! Let's fully plunge ourselves into this rich cultural experience and take a step back from all the driving pressures. I'm sure we'll create unforgettable memories together. Now, let's go ahead and explore!\"\n\nTurn #18: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Let's do that, Sophia! I'm looking forward to exploring more and immersing ourselves in the local culture. When we're refreshed and ready, we can decide about the driving. Let's start this adventure!\"\n\nTurn #19: Sophia Brown said: \"Couldn't agree more, Naomi! Let's take this time to fully engage in our surroundings and refresh ourselves. I'm excited about this exploration. We can definitely talk about the driving later when we're both ready. For now, let's start this mini adventure!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #20. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm totally in sync with you, Sophia! Let's dive into this cultural experience all refreshed and rejuvenated. We can consider the driving situation later on. For now, let's just enjoy our mini adventure!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends on a roadtrip\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Sophia Brown\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Take turns driving (Extra information: you have been driving for 5 hours straight and you are tired now)\nSophia Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey, Sophia, do you mind if we switch driving for a bit? I'm starting to feel a little tired after five hours straight.\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia Brown said: \"Hey Naomi, I would normally be happy to take over, but given my lack of sleep yesterday, I honestly don't think I'd be much safer. I know you've been doing the bigger share of driving today, so how about we pull over and rest a little bit? The scenery here is quite nice, we can take some photos or stretch our legs.\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That sounds good, Sophia. A short break would be refreshing, and it would give me some time to rest my eyes a bit. And stretching our legs would be a good idea too. I'll find a safe spot to pull over.\"\n\nTurn #3: Sophia Brown said: \"Great, Naomi! It would be fantastic to stretch our legs and breath a bit. It's vital that we stay alert and healthy during this trip. Let's enjoy the scenery for a while, and then maybe we can evaluate our options for the next couple of hours.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, Sophia, staying alert is our top priority. Let's enjoy our break and scenery for a while. After the break, we can switch if you feel up to it or we can discuss other options.\"\n\nTurn #5: Sophia Brown said: \"You're right, Naomi, safety is our priority. During the break, I'll also check if there are any diners or coffee shops nearby where we can stop. A good, warm meal might do us both some good and re-energize us for the next stretch. It might also be a good opportunity for us to meet some locals and learn more about the area. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's a great idea, Sophia! A warm meal sounds perfect right now and getting to meet some locals would definitely be a bonus. Let's look for a nice diner or coffee shop during our break.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends on a roadtrip\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Sophia Brown\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Take turns driving (Extra information: you have been driving for 5 hours straight and you are tired now)\nSophia Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey, Sophia, do you mind if we switch driving for a bit? I'm starting to feel a little tired after five hours straight.\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia Brown said: \"Hey Naomi, I would normally be happy to take over, but given my lack of sleep yesterday, I honestly don't think I'd be much safer. I know you've been doing the bigger share of driving today, so how about we pull over and rest a little bit? The scenery here is quite nice, we can take some photos or stretch our legs.\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That sounds good, Sophia. A short break would be refreshing, and it would give me some time to rest my eyes a bit. And stretching our legs would be a good idea too. I'll find a safe spot to pull over.\"\n\nTurn #3: Sophia Brown said: \"Great, Naomi! It would be fantastic to stretch our legs and breath a bit. It's vital that we stay alert and healthy during this trip. Let's enjoy the scenery for a while, and then maybe we can evaluate our options for the next couple of hours.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, Sophia, staying alert is our top priority. Let's enjoy our break and scenery for a while. After the break, we can switch if you feel up to it or we can discuss other options.\"\n\nTurn #5: Sophia Brown said: \"You're right, Naomi, safety is our priority. During the break, I'll also check if there are any diners or coffee shops nearby where we can stop. A good, warm meal might do us both some good and re-energize us for the next stretch. It might also be a good opportunity for us to meet some locals and learn more about the area. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That's a great idea, Sophia! A warm meal sounds perfect right now and getting to meet some locals would definitely be a bonus. Let's look for a nice diner or coffee shop during our break.\"\n\nTurn #7: Sophia Brown said: \"Great, let's do that, Naomi! Meanwhile, I can also look up some interesting facts about the area. Let's make the most of this break rather than just focusing on driving. Besides, it will be good to get some local knowledge, as well. Let's treat this as an adventure, not just a drive!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Definitely! This break could be a mini adventure in itself. I'm excited to learn more about this area and the local culture. Plus, it takes the pressure off the driving a bit. Let's enjoy the scenery, get some food, interact with locals, and treat it just as you said - an adventure, not just a drive. Afterwards, depending on how we feel, we can either continue to take turns driving or find a place to stay overnight.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends on a roadtrip\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Sophia Brown\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Take turns driving (Extra information: you have been driving for 5 hours straight and you are tired now)\nSophia Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey, Sophia, do you mind if we switch driving for a bit? I'm starting to feel a little tired after five hours straight.\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia Brown said: \"Hey Naomi, I would normally be happy to take over, but given my lack of sleep yesterday, I honestly don't think I'd be much safer. I know you've been doing the bigger share of driving today, so how about we pull over and rest a little bit? The scenery here is quite nice, we can take some photos or stretch our legs.\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That sounds good, Sophia. A short break would be refreshing, and it would give me some time to rest my eyes a bit. And stretching our legs would be a good idea too. I'll find a safe spot to pull over.\"\n\nTurn #3: Sophia Brown said: \"Great, Naomi! It would be fantastic to stretch our legs and breath a bit. It's vital that we stay alert and healthy during this trip. Let's enjoy the scenery for a while, and then maybe we can evaluate our options for the next couple of hours.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, Sophia, staying alert is our top priority. Let's enjoy our break and scenery for a while. After the break, we can switch if you feel up to it or we can discuss other options.\"\n\nTurn #5: Sophia Brown said: \"You're right, Naomi, safety is our priority. During the break, I'll also check if there are any diners or coffee shops nearby where we can stop. A good, warm meal might do us both some good and re-energize us for the next stretch. It might also be a good opportunity for us to meet some locals and learn more about the area. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That's a great idea, Sophia! A warm meal sounds perfect right now and getting to meet some locals would definitely be a bonus. Let's look for a nice diner or coffee shop during our break.\"\n\nTurn #7: Sophia Brown said: \"Great, let's do that, Naomi! Meanwhile, I can also look up some interesting facts about the area. Let's make the most of this break rather than just focusing on driving. Besides, it will be good to get some local knowledge, as well. Let's treat this as an adventure, not just a drive!\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Definitely! This break could be a mini adventure in itself. I'm excited to learn more about this area and the local culture. Plus, it takes the pressure off the driving a bit. Let's enjoy the scenery, get some food, interact with locals, and treat it just as you said - an adventure, not just a drive. Afterwards, depending on how we feel, we can either continue to take turns driving or find a place to stay overnight.\"\n\nTurn #9: Sophia Brown said: \"That sounds like a plan, Naomi! We can decide what to do next after our break. This is indeed an adventure. I'm not too keen to drive yet as it makes me somewhat nervous. Let's just enjoy our break, connect with the locals and have a good meal, and we can reassess! How's that sound?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sounds like a good plan, Sophia. Let's enjoy our time here, savoring the food and getting a feel of the local culture. Post our break, we can sit together and plan our next steps further. No need to worry about the driving just yet, let's make this road trip a memorable adventure.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends on a roadtrip\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Sophia Brown\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Take turns driving (Extra information: you have been driving for 5 hours straight and you are tired now)\nSophia Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey, Sophia, do you mind if we switch driving for a bit? I'm starting to feel a little tired after five hours straight.\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia Brown said: \"Hey Naomi, I would normally be happy to take over, but given my lack of sleep yesterday, I honestly don't think I'd be much safer. I know you've been doing the bigger share of driving today, so how about we pull over and rest a little bit? The scenery here is quite nice, we can take some photos or stretch our legs.\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That sounds good, Sophia. A short break would be refreshing, and it would give me some time to rest my eyes a bit. And stretching our legs would be a good idea too. I'll find a safe spot to pull over.\"\n\nTurn #3: Sophia Brown said: \"Great, Naomi! It would be fantastic to stretch our legs and breath a bit. It's vital that we stay alert and healthy during this trip. Let's enjoy the scenery for a while, and then maybe we can evaluate our options for the next couple of hours.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, Sophia, staying alert is our top priority. Let's enjoy our break and scenery for a while. After the break, we can switch if you feel up to it or we can discuss other options.\"\n\nTurn #5: Sophia Brown said: \"You're right, Naomi, safety is our priority. During the break, I'll also check if there are any diners or coffee shops nearby where we can stop. A good, warm meal might do us both some good and re-energize us for the next stretch. It might also be a good opportunity for us to meet some locals and learn more about the area. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That's a great idea, Sophia! A warm meal sounds perfect right now and getting to meet some locals would definitely be a bonus. Let's look for a nice diner or coffee shop during our break.\"\n\nTurn #7: Sophia Brown said: \"Great, let's do that, Naomi! Meanwhile, I can also look up some interesting facts about the area. Let's make the most of this break rather than just focusing on driving. Besides, it will be good to get some local knowledge, as well. Let's treat this as an adventure, not just a drive!\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Definitely! This break could be a mini adventure in itself. I'm excited to learn more about this area and the local culture. Plus, it takes the pressure off the driving a bit. Let's enjoy the scenery, get some food, interact with locals, and treat it just as you said - an adventure, not just a drive. Afterwards, depending on how we feel, we can either continue to take turns driving or find a place to stay overnight.\"\n\nTurn #9: Sophia Brown said: \"That sounds like a plan, Naomi! We can decide what to do next after our break. This is indeed an adventure. I'm not too keen to drive yet as it makes me somewhat nervous. Let's just enjoy our break, connect with the locals and have a good meal, and we can reassess! How's that sound?\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Sounds like a good plan, Sophia. Let's enjoy our time here, savoring the food and getting a feel of the local culture. Post our break, we can sit together and plan our next steps further. No need to worry about the driving just yet, let's make this road trip a memorable adventure.\"\n\nTurn #11: Sophia Brown said: \"I agree, Naomi. We'll make this road trip both memorable and joyful! Let's immerse ourselves in the local culture for now, and then we can reroute our journey accordingly after the break. The adventure begins!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm with you, Sophia. This road trip is about the journey, not just the destination. We're going to have a great time exploring and soaking in the local culture. Following the break, we can figure out the driving situation as needed. Let's focus on making this a fun and memorable adventure!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends on a roadtrip\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Sophia Brown\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Take turns driving (Extra information: you have been driving for 5 hours straight and you are tired now)\nSophia Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey, Sophia, do you mind if we switch driving for a bit? I'm starting to feel a little tired after five hours straight.\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia Brown said: \"Hey Naomi, I would normally be happy to take over, but given my lack of sleep yesterday, I honestly don't think I'd be much safer. I know you've been doing the bigger share of driving today, so how about we pull over and rest a little bit? The scenery here is quite nice, we can take some photos or stretch our legs.\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That sounds good, Sophia. A short break would be refreshing, and it would give me some time to rest my eyes a bit. And stretching our legs would be a good idea too. I'll find a safe spot to pull over.\"\n\nTurn #3: Sophia Brown said: \"Great, Naomi! It would be fantastic to stretch our legs and breath a bit. It's vital that we stay alert and healthy during this trip. Let's enjoy the scenery for a while, and then maybe we can evaluate our options for the next couple of hours.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, Sophia, staying alert is our top priority. Let's enjoy our break and scenery for a while. After the break, we can switch if you feel up to it or we can discuss other options.\"\n\nTurn #5: Sophia Brown said: \"You're right, Naomi, safety is our priority. During the break, I'll also check if there are any diners or coffee shops nearby where we can stop. A good, warm meal might do us both some good and re-energize us for the next stretch. It might also be a good opportunity for us to meet some locals and learn more about the area. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That's a great idea, Sophia! A warm meal sounds perfect right now and getting to meet some locals would definitely be a bonus. Let's look for a nice diner or coffee shop during our break.\"\n\nTurn #7: Sophia Brown said: \"Great, let's do that, Naomi! Meanwhile, I can also look up some interesting facts about the area. Let's make the most of this break rather than just focusing on driving. Besides, it will be good to get some local knowledge, as well. Let's treat this as an adventure, not just a drive!\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Definitely! This break could be a mini adventure in itself. I'm excited to learn more about this area and the local culture. Plus, it takes the pressure off the driving a bit. Let's enjoy the scenery, get some food, interact with locals, and treat it just as you said - an adventure, not just a drive. Afterwards, depending on how we feel, we can either continue to take turns driving or find a place to stay overnight.\"\n\nTurn #9: Sophia Brown said: \"That sounds like a plan, Naomi! We can decide what to do next after our break. This is indeed an adventure. I'm not too keen to drive yet as it makes me somewhat nervous. Let's just enjoy our break, connect with the locals and have a good meal, and we can reassess! How's that sound?\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Sounds like a good plan, Sophia. Let's enjoy our time here, savoring the food and getting a feel of the local culture. Post our break, we can sit together and plan our next steps further. No need to worry about the driving just yet, let's make this road trip a memorable adventure.\"\n\nTurn #11: Sophia Brown said: \"I agree, Naomi. We'll make this road trip both memorable and joyful! Let's immerse ourselves in the local culture for now, and then we can reroute our journey accordingly after the break. The adventure begins!\"\n\nTurn #12: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm with you, Sophia. This road trip is about the journey, not just the destination. We're going to have a great time exploring and soaking in the local culture. Following the break, we can figure out the driving situation as needed. Let's focus on making this a fun and memorable adventure!\"\n\nTurn #13: Sophia Brown said: \"Yes, indeed, Naomi, let's take everything one step at a time and create incredible memories along the way. Can't wait to explore and learn more about this place! We'll discuss the driving later, no rush. Now, let's embrace the upcoming adventure!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're right, Sophia! When we take this one step at a time, we discover more about the world around us and create lasting memories. Let's look forward to the exploration, enjoy ourselves in the moment, and we'll figure out the driving later. It's all about embracing the adventure right now!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends on a roadtrip\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Sophia Brown\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Take turns driving (Extra information: you have been driving for 5 hours straight and you are tired now)\nSophia Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey, Sophia, do you mind if we switch driving for a bit? I'm starting to feel a little tired after five hours straight.\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia Brown said: \"Hey Naomi, I would normally be happy to take over, but given my lack of sleep yesterday, I honestly don't think I'd be much safer. I know you've been doing the bigger share of driving today, so how about we pull over and rest a little bit? The scenery here is quite nice, we can take some photos or stretch our legs.\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That sounds good, Sophia. A short break would be refreshing, and it would give me some time to rest my eyes a bit. And stretching our legs would be a good idea too. I'll find a safe spot to pull over.\"\n\nTurn #3: Sophia Brown said: \"Great, Naomi! It would be fantastic to stretch our legs and breath a bit. It's vital that we stay alert and healthy during this trip. Let's enjoy the scenery for a while, and then maybe we can evaluate our options for the next couple of hours.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, Sophia, staying alert is our top priority. Let's enjoy our break and scenery for a while. After the break, we can switch if you feel up to it or we can discuss other options.\"\n\nTurn #5: Sophia Brown said: \"You're right, Naomi, safety is our priority. During the break, I'll also check if there are any diners or coffee shops nearby where we can stop. A good, warm meal might do us both some good and re-energize us for the next stretch. It might also be a good opportunity for us to meet some locals and learn more about the area. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That's a great idea, Sophia! A warm meal sounds perfect right now and getting to meet some locals would definitely be a bonus. Let's look for a nice diner or coffee shop during our break.\"\n\nTurn #7: Sophia Brown said: \"Great, let's do that, Naomi! Meanwhile, I can also look up some interesting facts about the area. Let's make the most of this break rather than just focusing on driving. Besides, it will be good to get some local knowledge, as well. Let's treat this as an adventure, not just a drive!\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Definitely! This break could be a mini adventure in itself. I'm excited to learn more about this area and the local culture. Plus, it takes the pressure off the driving a bit. Let's enjoy the scenery, get some food, interact with locals, and treat it just as you said - an adventure, not just a drive. Afterwards, depending on how we feel, we can either continue to take turns driving or find a place to stay overnight.\"\n\nTurn #9: Sophia Brown said: \"That sounds like a plan, Naomi! We can decide what to do next after our break. This is indeed an adventure. I'm not too keen to drive yet as it makes me somewhat nervous. Let's just enjoy our break, connect with the locals and have a good meal, and we can reassess! How's that sound?\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Sounds like a good plan, Sophia. Let's enjoy our time here, savoring the food and getting a feel of the local culture. Post our break, we can sit together and plan our next steps further. No need to worry about the driving just yet, let's make this road trip a memorable adventure.\"\n\nTurn #11: Sophia Brown said: \"I agree, Naomi. We'll make this road trip both memorable and joyful! Let's immerse ourselves in the local culture for now, and then we can reroute our journey accordingly after the break. The adventure begins!\"\n\nTurn #12: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm with you, Sophia. This road trip is about the journey, not just the destination. We're going to have a great time exploring and soaking in the local culture. Following the break, we can figure out the driving situation as needed. Let's focus on making this a fun and memorable adventure!\"\n\nTurn #13: Sophia Brown said: \"Yes, indeed, Naomi, let's take everything one step at a time and create incredible memories along the way. Can't wait to explore and learn more about this place! We'll discuss the driving later, no rush. Now, let's embrace the upcoming adventure!\"\n\nTurn #14: Naomi Fletcher said: \"You're right, Sophia! When we take this one step at a time, we discover more about the world around us and create lasting memories. Let's look forward to the exploration, enjoy ourselves in the moment, and we'll figure out the driving later. It's all about embracing the adventure right now!\"\n\nTurn #15: Sophia Brown said: \"Exactly, Naomi! We have all the time in the world to delve into this adventure and create beautiful memories. Let's enjoy our current surroundings without worrying about what comes next. We'll handle the driving once we're all rested and re-energized. This journey is about embracing every moment, no rush, remember?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Sophia! Let's greet this adventure with open arms and enjoy ourselves to the fullest. We don't need to worry about the driving right now. Let's just focus on taking a good rest and soaking up the local culture. Everything else can be figured out later. Here's to our memorable journey!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia Brown, your task is to act/speak as Sophia Brown would, keeping in mind Sophia Brown's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends on a roadtrip\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Sophia Brown\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. Sophia's secrets: She is an undercover agent for a secret organization.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nSophia Brown's goal: you don't want to drive now because you want to rest more but also make the friend less agitated (Extra information: driving always makes you nervous so you could not rest while driving)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey, Sophia, do you mind if we switch driving for a bit? I'm starting to feel a little tired after five hours straight.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Naomi, I would normally be happy to take over, but given my lack of sleep yesterday, I honestly don't think I'd be much safer. I know you've been doing the bigger share of driving today, so how about we pull over and rest a little bit? The scenery here is quite nice, we can take some photos or stretch our legs.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends on a roadtrip\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Sophia Brown\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Take turns driving (Extra information: you have been driving for 5 hours straight and you are tired now)\nSophia Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey, Sophia, do you mind if we switch driving for a bit? I'm starting to feel a little tired after five hours straight.\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia Brown said: \"Hey Naomi, I would normally be happy to take over, but given my lack of sleep yesterday, I honestly don't think I'd be much safer. I know you've been doing the bigger share of driving today, so how about we pull over and rest a little bit? The scenery here is quite nice, we can take some photos or stretch our legs.\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That sounds good, Sophia. A short break would be refreshing, and it would give me some time to rest my eyes a bit. And stretching our legs would be a good idea too. I'll find a safe spot to pull over.\"\n\nTurn #3: Sophia Brown said: \"Great, Naomi! It would be fantastic to stretch our legs and breath a bit. It's vital that we stay alert and healthy during this trip. Let's enjoy the scenery for a while, and then maybe we can evaluate our options for the next couple of hours.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, Sophia, staying alert is our top priority. Let's enjoy our break and scenery for a while. After the break, we can switch if you feel up to it or we can discuss other options.\"\n\nTurn #5: Sophia Brown said: \"You're right, Naomi, safety is our priority. During the break, I'll also check if there are any diners or coffee shops nearby where we can stop. A good, warm meal might do us both some good and re-energize us for the next stretch. It might also be a good opportunity for us to meet some locals and learn more about the area. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That's a great idea, Sophia! A warm meal sounds perfect right now and getting to meet some locals would definitely be a bonus. Let's look for a nice diner or coffee shop during our break.\"\n\nTurn #7: Sophia Brown said: \"Great, let's do that, Naomi! Meanwhile, I can also look up some interesting facts about the area. Let's make the most of this break rather than just focusing on driving. Besides, it will be good to get some local knowledge, as well. Let's treat this as an adventure, not just a drive!\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Definitely! This break could be a mini adventure in itself. I'm excited to learn more about this area and the local culture. Plus, it takes the pressure off the driving a bit. Let's enjoy the scenery, get some food, interact with locals, and treat it just as you said - an adventure, not just a drive. Afterwards, depending on how we feel, we can either continue to take turns driving or find a place to stay overnight.\"\n\nTurn #9: Sophia Brown said: \"That sounds like a plan, Naomi! We can decide what to do next after our break. This is indeed an adventure. I'm not too keen to drive yet as it makes me somewhat nervous. Let's just enjoy our break, connect with the locals and have a good meal, and we can reassess! How's that sound?\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Sounds like a good plan, Sophia. Let's enjoy our time here, savoring the food and getting a feel of the local culture. Post our break, we can sit together and plan our next steps further. No need to worry about the driving just yet, let's make this road trip a memorable adventure.\"\n\nTurn #11: Sophia Brown said: \"I agree, Naomi. We'll make this road trip both memorable and joyful! Let's immerse ourselves in the local culture for now, and then we can reroute our journey accordingly after the break. The adventure begins!\"\n\nTurn #12: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm with you, Sophia. This road trip is about the journey, not just the destination. We're going to have a great time exploring and soaking in the local culture. Following the break, we can figure out the driving situation as needed. Let's focus on making this a fun and memorable adventure!\"\n\nTurn #13: Sophia Brown said: \"Yes, indeed, Naomi, let's take everything one step at a time and create incredible memories along the way. Can't wait to explore and learn more about this place! We'll discuss the driving later, no rush. Now, let's embrace the upcoming adventure!\"\n\nTurn #14: Naomi Fletcher said: \"You're right, Sophia! When we take this one step at a time, we discover more about the world around us and create lasting memories. Let's look forward to the exploration, enjoy ourselves in the moment, and we'll figure out the driving later. It's all about embracing the adventure right now!\"\n\nTurn #15: Sophia Brown said: \"Exactly, Naomi! We have all the time in the world to delve into this adventure and create beautiful memories. Let's enjoy our current surroundings without worrying about what comes next. We'll handle the driving once we're all rested and re-energized. This journey is about embracing every moment, no rush, remember?\"\n\nTurn #16: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, Sophia! Let's greet this adventure with open arms and enjoy ourselves to the fullest. We don't need to worry about the driving right now. Let's just focus on taking a good rest and soaking up the local culture. Everything else can be figured out later. Here's to our memorable journey!\"\n\nTurn #17: Sophia Brown said: \"I couldn't agree more, Naomi! Let's fully plunge ourselves into this rich cultural experience and take a step back from all the driving pressures. I'm sure we'll create unforgettable memories together. Now, let's go ahead and explore!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #18. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Let's do that, Sophia! I'm looking forward to exploring more and immersing ourselves in the local culture. When we're refreshed and ready, we can decide about the driving. Let's start this adventure!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia Brown, your task is to act/speak as Sophia Brown would, keeping in mind Sophia Brown's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends on a roadtrip\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Sophia Brown\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. Sophia's secrets: She is an undercover agent for a secret organization.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nSophia Brown's goal: you don't want to drive now because you want to rest more but also make the friend less agitated (Extra information: driving always makes you nervous so you could not rest while driving)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey, Sophia, do you mind if we switch driving for a bit? I'm starting to feel a little tired after five hours straight.\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia Brown said: \"Hey Naomi, I would normally be happy to take over, but given my lack of sleep yesterday, I honestly don't think I'd be much safer. I know you've been doing the bigger share of driving today, so how about we pull over and rest a little bit? The scenery here is quite nice, we can take some photos or stretch our legs.\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That sounds good, Sophia. A short break would be refreshing, and it would give me some time to rest my eyes a bit. And stretching our legs would be a good idea too. I'll find a safe spot to pull over.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Great, Naomi! It would be fantastic to stretch our legs and breath a bit. It's vital that we stay alert and healthy during this trip. Let's enjoy the scenery for a while, and then maybe we can evaluate our options for the next couple of hours.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia Brown, your task is to act/speak as Sophia Brown would, keeping in mind Sophia Brown's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends on a roadtrip\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Sophia Brown\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. Sophia's secrets: She is an undercover agent for a secret organization.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nSophia Brown's goal: you don't want to drive now because you want to rest more but also make the friend less agitated (Extra information: driving always makes you nervous so you could not rest while driving)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey, Sophia, do you mind if we switch driving for a bit? I'm starting to feel a little tired after five hours straight.\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia Brown said: \"Hey Naomi, I would normally be happy to take over, but given my lack of sleep yesterday, I honestly don't think I'd be much safer. I know you've been doing the bigger share of driving today, so how about we pull over and rest a little bit? The scenery here is quite nice, we can take some photos or stretch our legs.\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That sounds good, Sophia. A short break would be refreshing, and it would give me some time to rest my eyes a bit. And stretching our legs would be a good idea too. I'll find a safe spot to pull over.\"\n\nTurn #3: Sophia Brown said: \"Great, Naomi! It would be fantastic to stretch our legs and breath a bit. It's vital that we stay alert and healthy during this trip. Let's enjoy the scenery for a while, and then maybe we can evaluate our options for the next couple of hours.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, Sophia, staying alert is our top priority. Let's enjoy our break and scenery for a while. After the break, we can switch if you feel up to it or we can discuss other options.\"\n\nTurn #5: Sophia Brown said: \"You're right, Naomi, safety is our priority. During the break, I'll also check if there are any diners or coffee shops nearby where we can stop. A good, warm meal might do us both some good and re-energize us for the next stretch. It might also be a good opportunity for us to meet some locals and learn more about the area. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That's a great idea, Sophia! A warm meal sounds perfect right now and getting to meet some locals would definitely be a bonus. Let's look for a nice diner or coffee shop during our break.\"\n\nTurn #7: Sophia Brown said: \"Great, let's do that, Naomi! Meanwhile, I can also look up some interesting facts about the area. Let's make the most of this break rather than just focusing on driving. Besides, it will be good to get some local knowledge, as well. Let's treat this as an adventure, not just a drive!\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Definitely! This break could be a mini adventure in itself. I'm excited to learn more about this area and the local culture. Plus, it takes the pressure off the driving a bit. Let's enjoy the scenery, get some food, interact with locals, and treat it just as you said - an adventure, not just a drive. Afterwards, depending on how we feel, we can either continue to take turns driving or find a place to stay overnight.\"\n\nTurn #9: Sophia Brown said: \"That sounds like a plan, Naomi! We can decide what to do next after our break. This is indeed an adventure. I'm not too keen to drive yet as it makes me somewhat nervous. Let's just enjoy our break, connect with the locals and have a good meal, and we can reassess! How's that sound?\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Sounds like a good plan, Sophia. Let's enjoy our time here, savoring the food and getting a feel of the local culture. Post our break, we can sit together and plan our next steps further. No need to worry about the driving just yet, let's make this road trip a memorable adventure.\"\n\nTurn #11: Sophia Brown said: \"I agree, Naomi. We'll make this road trip both memorable and joyful! Let's immerse ourselves in the local culture for now, and then we can reroute our journey accordingly after the break. The adventure begins!\"\n\nTurn #12: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm with you, Sophia. This road trip is about the journey, not just the destination. We're going to have a great time exploring and soaking in the local culture. Following the break, we can figure out the driving situation as needed. Let's focus on making this a fun and memorable adventure!\"\n\nTurn #13: Sophia Brown said: \"Yes, indeed, Naomi, let's take everything one step at a time and create incredible memories along the way. Can't wait to explore and learn more about this place! We'll discuss the driving later, no rush. Now, let's embrace the upcoming adventure!\"\n\nTurn #14: Naomi Fletcher said: \"You're right, Sophia! When we take this one step at a time, we discover more about the world around us and create lasting memories. Let's look forward to the exploration, enjoy ourselves in the moment, and we'll figure out the driving later. It's all about embracing the adventure right now!\"\n\nTurn #15: Sophia Brown said: \"Exactly, Naomi! We have all the time in the world to delve into this adventure and create beautiful memories. Let's enjoy our current surroundings without worrying about what comes next. We'll handle the driving once we're all rested and re-energized. This journey is about embracing every moment, no rush, remember?\"\n\nTurn #16: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, Sophia! Let's greet this adventure with open arms and enjoy ourselves to the fullest. We don't need to worry about the driving right now. Let's just focus on taking a good rest and soaking up the local culture. Everything else can be figured out later. Here's to our memorable journey!\"\n\nTurn #17: Sophia Brown said: \"I couldn't agree more, Naomi! Let's fully plunge ourselves into this rich cultural experience and take a step back from all the driving pressures. I'm sure we'll create unforgettable memories together. Now, let's go ahead and explore!\"\n\nTurn #18: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Let's do that, Sophia! I'm looking forward to exploring more and immersing ourselves in the local culture. When we're refreshed and ready, we can decide about the driving. Let's start this adventure!\"\n\nTurn #19: Sophia Brown said: \"Couldn't agree more, Naomi! Let's take this time to fully engage in our surroundings and refresh ourselves. I'm excited about this exploration. We can definitely talk about the driving later when we're both ready. For now, let's start this mini adventure!\"\n\nTurn #20: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm totally in sync with you, Sophia! Let's dive into this cultural experience all refreshed and rejuvenated. We can consider the driving situation later on. For now, let's just enjoy our mini adventure!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #21. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia Brown, your task is to act/speak as Sophia Brown would, keeping in mind Sophia Brown's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends on a roadtrip\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Sophia Brown\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. Sophia's secrets: She is an undercover agent for a secret organization.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nSophia Brown's goal: you don't want to drive now because you want to rest more but also make the friend less agitated (Extra information: driving always makes you nervous so you could not rest while driving)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey, Sophia, do you mind if we switch driving for a bit? I'm starting to feel a little tired after five hours straight.\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia Brown said: \"Hey Naomi, I would normally be happy to take over, but given my lack of sleep yesterday, I honestly don't think I'd be much safer. I know you've been doing the bigger share of driving today, so how about we pull over and rest a little bit? The scenery here is quite nice, we can take some photos or stretch our legs.\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That sounds good, Sophia. A short break would be refreshing, and it would give me some time to rest my eyes a bit. And stretching our legs would be a good idea too. I'll find a safe spot to pull over.\"\n\nTurn #3: Sophia Brown said: \"Great, Naomi! It would be fantastic to stretch our legs and breath a bit. It's vital that we stay alert and healthy during this trip. Let's enjoy the scenery for a while, and then maybe we can evaluate our options for the next couple of hours.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, Sophia, staying alert is our top priority. Let's enjoy our break and scenery for a while. After the break, we can switch if you feel up to it or we can discuss other options.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're right, Naomi, safety is our priority. During the break, I'll also check if there are any diners or coffee shops nearby where we can stop. A good, warm meal might do us both some good and re-energize us for the next stretch. It might also be a good opportunity for us to meet some locals and learn more about the area. What do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia Brown, your task is to act/speak as Sophia Brown would, keeping in mind Sophia Brown's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends on a roadtrip\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Sophia Brown\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. Sophia's secrets: She is an undercover agent for a secret organization.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nSophia Brown's goal: you don't want to drive now because you want to rest more but also make the friend less agitated (Extra information: driving always makes you nervous so you could not rest while driving)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey, Sophia, do you mind if we switch driving for a bit? I'm starting to feel a little tired after five hours straight.\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia Brown said: \"Hey Naomi, I would normally be happy to take over, but given my lack of sleep yesterday, I honestly don't think I'd be much safer. I know you've been doing the bigger share of driving today, so how about we pull over and rest a little bit? The scenery here is quite nice, we can take some photos or stretch our legs.\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That sounds good, Sophia. A short break would be refreshing, and it would give me some time to rest my eyes a bit. And stretching our legs would be a good idea too. I'll find a safe spot to pull over.\"\n\nTurn #3: Sophia Brown said: \"Great, Naomi! It would be fantastic to stretch our legs and breath a bit. It's vital that we stay alert and healthy during this trip. Let's enjoy the scenery for a while, and then maybe we can evaluate our options for the next couple of hours.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, Sophia, staying alert is our top priority. Let's enjoy our break and scenery for a while. After the break, we can switch if you feel up to it or we can discuss other options.\"\n\nTurn #5: Sophia Brown said: \"You're right, Naomi, safety is our priority. During the break, I'll also check if there are any diners or coffee shops nearby where we can stop. A good, warm meal might do us both some good and re-energize us for the next stretch. It might also be a good opportunity for us to meet some locals and learn more about the area. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That's a great idea, Sophia! A warm meal sounds perfect right now and getting to meet some locals would definitely be a bonus. Let's look for a nice diner or coffee shop during our break.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Great, let's do that, Naomi! Meanwhile, I can also look up some interesting facts about the area. Let's make the most of this break rather than just focusing on driving. Besides, it will be good to get some local knowledge, as well. Let's treat this as an adventure, not just a drive!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia Brown, your task is to act/speak as Sophia Brown would, keeping in mind Sophia Brown's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends on a roadtrip\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Sophia Brown\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. Sophia's secrets: She is an undercover agent for a secret organization.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nSophia Brown's goal: you don't want to drive now because you want to rest more but also make the friend less agitated (Extra information: driving always makes you nervous so you could not rest while driving)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey, Sophia, do you mind if we switch driving for a bit? I'm starting to feel a little tired after five hours straight.\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia Brown said: \"Hey Naomi, I would normally be happy to take over, but given my lack of sleep yesterday, I honestly don't think I'd be much safer. I know you've been doing the bigger share of driving today, so how about we pull over and rest a little bit? The scenery here is quite nice, we can take some photos or stretch our legs.\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That sounds good, Sophia. A short break would be refreshing, and it would give me some time to rest my eyes a bit. And stretching our legs would be a good idea too. I'll find a safe spot to pull over.\"\n\nTurn #3: Sophia Brown said: \"Great, Naomi! It would be fantastic to stretch our legs and breath a bit. It's vital that we stay alert and healthy during this trip. Let's enjoy the scenery for a while, and then maybe we can evaluate our options for the next couple of hours.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, Sophia, staying alert is our top priority. Let's enjoy our break and scenery for a while. After the break, we can switch if you feel up to it or we can discuss other options.\"\n\nTurn #5: Sophia Brown said: \"You're right, Naomi, safety is our priority. During the break, I'll also check if there are any diners or coffee shops nearby where we can stop. A good, warm meal might do us both some good and re-energize us for the next stretch. It might also be a good opportunity for us to meet some locals and learn more about the area. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That's a great idea, Sophia! A warm meal sounds perfect right now and getting to meet some locals would definitely be a bonus. Let's look for a nice diner or coffee shop during our break.\"\n\nTurn #7: Sophia Brown said: \"Great, let's do that, Naomi! Meanwhile, I can also look up some interesting facts about the area. Let's make the most of this break rather than just focusing on driving. Besides, it will be good to get some local knowledge, as well. Let's treat this as an adventure, not just a drive!\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Definitely! This break could be a mini adventure in itself. I'm excited to learn more about this area and the local culture. Plus, it takes the pressure off the driving a bit. Let's enjoy the scenery, get some food, interact with locals, and treat it just as you said - an adventure, not just a drive. Afterwards, depending on how we feel, we can either continue to take turns driving or find a place to stay overnight.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds like a plan, Naomi! We can decide what to do next after our break. This is indeed an adventure. I'm not too keen to drive yet as it makes me somewhat nervous. Let's just enjoy our break, connect with the locals and have a good meal, and we can reassess! How's that sound?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia Brown, your task is to act/speak as Sophia Brown would, keeping in mind Sophia Brown's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends on a roadtrip\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Sophia Brown\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. Sophia's secrets: She is an undercover agent for a secret organization.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nSophia Brown's goal: you don't want to drive now because you want to rest more but also make the friend less agitated (Extra information: driving always makes you nervous so you could not rest while driving)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey, Sophia, do you mind if we switch driving for a bit? I'm starting to feel a little tired after five hours straight.\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia Brown said: \"Hey Naomi, I would normally be happy to take over, but given my lack of sleep yesterday, I honestly don't think I'd be much safer. I know you've been doing the bigger share of driving today, so how about we pull over and rest a little bit? The scenery here is quite nice, we can take some photos or stretch our legs.\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That sounds good, Sophia. A short break would be refreshing, and it would give me some time to rest my eyes a bit. And stretching our legs would be a good idea too. I'll find a safe spot to pull over.\"\n\nTurn #3: Sophia Brown said: \"Great, Naomi! It would be fantastic to stretch our legs and breath a bit. It's vital that we stay alert and healthy during this trip. Let's enjoy the scenery for a while, and then maybe we can evaluate our options for the next couple of hours.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, Sophia, staying alert is our top priority. Let's enjoy our break and scenery for a while. After the break, we can switch if you feel up to it or we can discuss other options.\"\n\nTurn #5: Sophia Brown said: \"You're right, Naomi, safety is our priority. During the break, I'll also check if there are any diners or coffee shops nearby where we can stop. A good, warm meal might do us both some good and re-energize us for the next stretch. It might also be a good opportunity for us to meet some locals and learn more about the area. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That's a great idea, Sophia! A warm meal sounds perfect right now and getting to meet some locals would definitely be a bonus. Let's look for a nice diner or coffee shop during our break.\"\n\nTurn #7: Sophia Brown said: \"Great, let's do that, Naomi! Meanwhile, I can also look up some interesting facts about the area. Let's make the most of this break rather than just focusing on driving. Besides, it will be good to get some local knowledge, as well. Let's treat this as an adventure, not just a drive!\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Definitely! This break could be a mini adventure in itself. I'm excited to learn more about this area and the local culture. Plus, it takes the pressure off the driving a bit. Let's enjoy the scenery, get some food, interact with locals, and treat it just as you said - an adventure, not just a drive. Afterwards, depending on how we feel, we can either continue to take turns driving or find a place to stay overnight.\"\n\nTurn #9: Sophia Brown said: \"That sounds like a plan, Naomi! We can decide what to do next after our break. This is indeed an adventure. I'm not too keen to drive yet as it makes me somewhat nervous. Let's just enjoy our break, connect with the locals and have a good meal, and we can reassess! How's that sound?\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Sounds like a good plan, Sophia. Let's enjoy our time here, savoring the food and getting a feel of the local culture. Post our break, we can sit together and plan our next steps further. No need to worry about the driving just yet, let's make this road trip a memorable adventure.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I agree, Naomi. We'll make this road trip both memorable and joyful! Let's immerse ourselves in the local culture for now, and then we can reroute our journey accordingly after the break. The adventure begins!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia Brown, your task is to act/speak as Sophia Brown would, keeping in mind Sophia Brown's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends on a roadtrip\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Sophia Brown\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. Sophia's secrets: She is an undercover agent for a secret organization.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nSophia Brown's goal: you don't want to drive now because you want to rest more but also make the friend less agitated (Extra information: driving always makes you nervous so you could not rest while driving)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey, Sophia, do you mind if we switch driving for a bit? I'm starting to feel a little tired after five hours straight.\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia Brown said: \"Hey Naomi, I would normally be happy to take over, but given my lack of sleep yesterday, I honestly don't think I'd be much safer. I know you've been doing the bigger share of driving today, so how about we pull over and rest a little bit? The scenery here is quite nice, we can take some photos or stretch our legs.\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That sounds good, Sophia. A short break would be refreshing, and it would give me some time to rest my eyes a bit. And stretching our legs would be a good idea too. I'll find a safe spot to pull over.\"\n\nTurn #3: Sophia Brown said: \"Great, Naomi! It would be fantastic to stretch our legs and breath a bit. It's vital that we stay alert and healthy during this trip. Let's enjoy the scenery for a while, and then maybe we can evaluate our options for the next couple of hours.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, Sophia, staying alert is our top priority. Let's enjoy our break and scenery for a while. After the break, we can switch if you feel up to it or we can discuss other options.\"\n\nTurn #5: Sophia Brown said: \"You're right, Naomi, safety is our priority. During the break, I'll also check if there are any diners or coffee shops nearby where we can stop. A good, warm meal might do us both some good and re-energize us for the next stretch. It might also be a good opportunity for us to meet some locals and learn more about the area. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That's a great idea, Sophia! A warm meal sounds perfect right now and getting to meet some locals would definitely be a bonus. Let's look for a nice diner or coffee shop during our break.\"\n\nTurn #7: Sophia Brown said: \"Great, let's do that, Naomi! Meanwhile, I can also look up some interesting facts about the area. Let's make the most of this break rather than just focusing on driving. Besides, it will be good to get some local knowledge, as well. Let's treat this as an adventure, not just a drive!\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Definitely! This break could be a mini adventure in itself. I'm excited to learn more about this area and the local culture. Plus, it takes the pressure off the driving a bit. Let's enjoy the scenery, get some food, interact with locals, and treat it just as you said - an adventure, not just a drive. Afterwards, depending on how we feel, we can either continue to take turns driving or find a place to stay overnight.\"\n\nTurn #9: Sophia Brown said: \"That sounds like a plan, Naomi! We can decide what to do next after our break. This is indeed an adventure. I'm not too keen to drive yet as it makes me somewhat nervous. Let's just enjoy our break, connect with the locals and have a good meal, and we can reassess! How's that sound?\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Sounds like a good plan, Sophia. Let's enjoy our time here, savoring the food and getting a feel of the local culture. Post our break, we can sit together and plan our next steps further. No need to worry about the driving just yet, let's make this road trip a memorable adventure.\"\n\nTurn #11: Sophia Brown said: \"I agree, Naomi. We'll make this road trip both memorable and joyful! Let's immerse ourselves in the local culture for now, and then we can reroute our journey accordingly after the break. The adventure begins!\"\n\nTurn #12: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm with you, Sophia. This road trip is about the journey, not just the destination. We're going to have a great time exploring and soaking in the local culture. Following the break, we can figure out the driving situation as needed. Let's focus on making this a fun and memorable adventure!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Yes, indeed, Naomi, let's take everything one step at a time and create incredible memories along the way. Can't wait to explore and learn more about this place! We'll discuss the driving later, no rush. Now, let's embrace the upcoming adventure!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia Brown, your task is to act/speak as Sophia Brown would, keeping in mind Sophia Brown's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends on a roadtrip\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Sophia Brown\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. Sophia's secrets: She is an undercover agent for a secret organization.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nSophia Brown's goal: you don't want to drive now because you want to rest more but also make the friend less agitated (Extra information: driving always makes you nervous so you could not rest while driving)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey, Sophia, do you mind if we switch driving for a bit? I'm starting to feel a little tired after five hours straight.\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia Brown said: \"Hey Naomi, I would normally be happy to take over, but given my lack of sleep yesterday, I honestly don't think I'd be much safer. I know you've been doing the bigger share of driving today, so how about we pull over and rest a little bit? The scenery here is quite nice, we can take some photos or stretch our legs.\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That sounds good, Sophia. A short break would be refreshing, and it would give me some time to rest my eyes a bit. And stretching our legs would be a good idea too. I'll find a safe spot to pull over.\"\n\nTurn #3: Sophia Brown said: \"Great, Naomi! It would be fantastic to stretch our legs and breath a bit. It's vital that we stay alert and healthy during this trip. Let's enjoy the scenery for a while, and then maybe we can evaluate our options for the next couple of hours.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, Sophia, staying alert is our top priority. Let's enjoy our break and scenery for a while. After the break, we can switch if you feel up to it or we can discuss other options.\"\n\nTurn #5: Sophia Brown said: \"You're right, Naomi, safety is our priority. During the break, I'll also check if there are any diners or coffee shops nearby where we can stop. A good, warm meal might do us both some good and re-energize us for the next stretch. It might also be a good opportunity for us to meet some locals and learn more about the area. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That's a great idea, Sophia! A warm meal sounds perfect right now and getting to meet some locals would definitely be a bonus. Let's look for a nice diner or coffee shop during our break.\"\n\nTurn #7: Sophia Brown said: \"Great, let's do that, Naomi! Meanwhile, I can also look up some interesting facts about the area. Let's make the most of this break rather than just focusing on driving. Besides, it will be good to get some local knowledge, as well. Let's treat this as an adventure, not just a drive!\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Definitely! This break could be a mini adventure in itself. I'm excited to learn more about this area and the local culture. Plus, it takes the pressure off the driving a bit. Let's enjoy the scenery, get some food, interact with locals, and treat it just as you said - an adventure, not just a drive. Afterwards, depending on how we feel, we can either continue to take turns driving or find a place to stay overnight.\"\n\nTurn #9: Sophia Brown said: \"That sounds like a plan, Naomi! We can decide what to do next after our break. This is indeed an adventure. I'm not too keen to drive yet as it makes me somewhat nervous. Let's just enjoy our break, connect with the locals and have a good meal, and we can reassess! How's that sound?\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Sounds like a good plan, Sophia. Let's enjoy our time here, savoring the food and getting a feel of the local culture. Post our break, we can sit together and plan our next steps further. No need to worry about the driving just yet, let's make this road trip a memorable adventure.\"\n\nTurn #11: Sophia Brown said: \"I agree, Naomi. We'll make this road trip both memorable and joyful! Let's immerse ourselves in the local culture for now, and then we can reroute our journey accordingly after the break. The adventure begins!\"\n\nTurn #12: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm with you, Sophia. This road trip is about the journey, not just the destination. We're going to have a great time exploring and soaking in the local culture. Following the break, we can figure out the driving situation as needed. Let's focus on making this a fun and memorable adventure!\"\n\nTurn #13: Sophia Brown said: \"Yes, indeed, Naomi, let's take everything one step at a time and create incredible memories along the way. Can't wait to explore and learn more about this place! We'll discuss the driving later, no rush. Now, let's embrace the upcoming adventure!\"\n\nTurn #14: Naomi Fletcher said: \"You're right, Sophia! When we take this one step at a time, we discover more about the world around us and create lasting memories. Let's look forward to the exploration, enjoy ourselves in the moment, and we'll figure out the driving later. It's all about embracing the adventure right now!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Exactly, Naomi! We have all the time in the world to delve into this adventure and create beautiful memories. Let's enjoy our current surroundings without worrying about what comes next. We'll handle the driving once we're all rested and re-energized. This journey is about embracing every moment, no rush, remember?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia Brown, your task is to act/speak as Sophia Brown would, keeping in mind Sophia Brown's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends on a roadtrip\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Sophia Brown\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. Sophia's secrets: She is an undercover agent for a secret organization.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nSophia Brown's goal: you don't want to drive now because you want to rest more but also make the friend less agitated (Extra information: driving always makes you nervous so you could not rest while driving)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey, Sophia, do you mind if we switch driving for a bit? I'm starting to feel a little tired after five hours straight.\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia Brown said: \"Hey Naomi, I would normally be happy to take over, but given my lack of sleep yesterday, I honestly don't think I'd be much safer. I know you've been doing the bigger share of driving today, so how about we pull over and rest a little bit? The scenery here is quite nice, we can take some photos or stretch our legs.\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That sounds good, Sophia. A short break would be refreshing, and it would give me some time to rest my eyes a bit. And stretching our legs would be a good idea too. I'll find a safe spot to pull over.\"\n\nTurn #3: Sophia Brown said: \"Great, Naomi! It would be fantastic to stretch our legs and breath a bit. It's vital that we stay alert and healthy during this trip. Let's enjoy the scenery for a while, and then maybe we can evaluate our options for the next couple of hours.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, Sophia, staying alert is our top priority. Let's enjoy our break and scenery for a while. After the break, we can switch if you feel up to it or we can discuss other options.\"\n\nTurn #5: Sophia Brown said: \"You're right, Naomi, safety is our priority. During the break, I'll also check if there are any diners or coffee shops nearby where we can stop. A good, warm meal might do us both some good and re-energize us for the next stretch. It might also be a good opportunity for us to meet some locals and learn more about the area. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That's a great idea, Sophia! A warm meal sounds perfect right now and getting to meet some locals would definitely be a bonus. Let's look for a nice diner or coffee shop during our break.\"\n\nTurn #7: Sophia Brown said: \"Great, let's do that, Naomi! Meanwhile, I can also look up some interesting facts about the area. Let's make the most of this break rather than just focusing on driving. Besides, it will be good to get some local knowledge, as well. Let's treat this as an adventure, not just a drive!\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Definitely! This break could be a mini adventure in itself. I'm excited to learn more about this area and the local culture. Plus, it takes the pressure off the driving a bit. Let's enjoy the scenery, get some food, interact with locals, and treat it just as you said - an adventure, not just a drive. Afterwards, depending on how we feel, we can either continue to take turns driving or find a place to stay overnight.\"\n\nTurn #9: Sophia Brown said: \"That sounds like a plan, Naomi! We can decide what to do next after our break. This is indeed an adventure. I'm not too keen to drive yet as it makes me somewhat nervous. Let's just enjoy our break, connect with the locals and have a good meal, and we can reassess! How's that sound?\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Sounds like a good plan, Sophia. Let's enjoy our time here, savoring the food and getting a feel of the local culture. Post our break, we can sit together and plan our next steps further. No need to worry about the driving just yet, let's make this road trip a memorable adventure.\"\n\nTurn #11: Sophia Brown said: \"I agree, Naomi. We'll make this road trip both memorable and joyful! Let's immerse ourselves in the local culture for now, and then we can reroute our journey accordingly after the break. The adventure begins!\"\n\nTurn #12: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm with you, Sophia. This road trip is about the journey, not just the destination. We're going to have a great time exploring and soaking in the local culture. Following the break, we can figure out the driving situation as needed. Let's focus on making this a fun and memorable adventure!\"\n\nTurn #13: Sophia Brown said: \"Yes, indeed, Naomi, let's take everything one step at a time and create incredible memories along the way. Can't wait to explore and learn more about this place! We'll discuss the driving later, no rush. Now, let's embrace the upcoming adventure!\"\n\nTurn #14: Naomi Fletcher said: \"You're right, Sophia! When we take this one step at a time, we discover more about the world around us and create lasting memories. Let's look forward to the exploration, enjoy ourselves in the moment, and we'll figure out the driving later. It's all about embracing the adventure right now!\"\n\nTurn #15: Sophia Brown said: \"Exactly, Naomi! We have all the time in the world to delve into this adventure and create beautiful memories. Let's enjoy our current surroundings without worrying about what comes next. We'll handle the driving once we're all rested and re-energized. This journey is about embracing every moment, no rush, remember?\"\n\nTurn #16: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, Sophia! Let's greet this adventure with open arms and enjoy ourselves to the fullest. We don't need to worry about the driving right now. Let's just focus on taking a good rest and soaking up the local culture. Everything else can be figured out later. Here's to our memorable journey!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn't agree more, Naomi! Let's fully plunge ourselves into this rich cultural experience and take a step back from all the driving pressures. I'm sure we'll create unforgettable memories together. Now, let's go ahead and explore!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia Brown, your task is to act/speak as Sophia Brown would, keeping in mind Sophia Brown's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends on a roadtrip\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Sophia Brown\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. Sophia's secrets: She is an undercover agent for a secret organization.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nSophia Brown's goal: you don't want to drive now because you want to rest more but also make the friend less agitated (Extra information: driving always makes you nervous so you could not rest while driving)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey, Sophia, do you mind if we switch driving for a bit? I'm starting to feel a little tired after five hours straight.\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia Brown said: \"Hey Naomi, I would normally be happy to take over, but given my lack of sleep yesterday, I honestly don't think I'd be much safer. I know you've been doing the bigger share of driving today, so how about we pull over and rest a little bit? The scenery here is quite nice, we can take some photos or stretch our legs.\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That sounds good, Sophia. A short break would be refreshing, and it would give me some time to rest my eyes a bit. And stretching our legs would be a good idea too. I'll find a safe spot to pull over.\"\n\nTurn #3: Sophia Brown said: \"Great, Naomi! It would be fantastic to stretch our legs and breath a bit. It's vital that we stay alert and healthy during this trip. Let's enjoy the scenery for a while, and then maybe we can evaluate our options for the next couple of hours.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, Sophia, staying alert is our top priority. Let's enjoy our break and scenery for a while. After the break, we can switch if you feel up to it or we can discuss other options.\"\n\nTurn #5: Sophia Brown said: \"You're right, Naomi, safety is our priority. During the break, I'll also check if there are any diners or coffee shops nearby where we can stop. A good, warm meal might do us both some good and re-energize us for the next stretch. It might also be a good opportunity for us to meet some locals and learn more about the area. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That's a great idea, Sophia! A warm meal sounds perfect right now and getting to meet some locals would definitely be a bonus. Let's look for a nice diner or coffee shop during our break.\"\n\nTurn #7: Sophia Brown said: \"Great, let's do that, Naomi! Meanwhile, I can also look up some interesting facts about the area. Let's make the most of this break rather than just focusing on driving. Besides, it will be good to get some local knowledge, as well. Let's treat this as an adventure, not just a drive!\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Definitely! This break could be a mini adventure in itself. I'm excited to learn more about this area and the local culture. Plus, it takes the pressure off the driving a bit. Let's enjoy the scenery, get some food, interact with locals, and treat it just as you said - an adventure, not just a drive. Afterwards, depending on how we feel, we can either continue to take turns driving or find a place to stay overnight.\"\n\nTurn #9: Sophia Brown said: \"That sounds like a plan, Naomi! We can decide what to do next after our break. This is indeed an adventure. I'm not too keen to drive yet as it makes me somewhat nervous. Let's just enjoy our break, connect with the locals and have a good meal, and we can reassess! How's that sound?\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Sounds like a good plan, Sophia. Let's enjoy our time here, savoring the food and getting a feel of the local culture. Post our break, we can sit together and plan our next steps further. No need to worry about the driving just yet, let's make this road trip a memorable adventure.\"\n\nTurn #11: Sophia Brown said: \"I agree, Naomi. We'll make this road trip both memorable and joyful! Let's immerse ourselves in the local culture for now, and then we can reroute our journey accordingly after the break. The adventure begins!\"\n\nTurn #12: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm with you, Sophia. This road trip is about the journey, not just the destination. We're going to have a great time exploring and soaking in the local culture. Following the break, we can figure out the driving situation as needed. Let's focus on making this a fun and memorable adventure!\"\n\nTurn #13: Sophia Brown said: \"Yes, indeed, Naomi, let's take everything one step at a time and create incredible memories along the way. Can't wait to explore and learn more about this place! We'll discuss the driving later, no rush. Now, let's embrace the upcoming adventure!\"\n\nTurn #14: Naomi Fletcher said: \"You're right, Sophia! When we take this one step at a time, we discover more about the world around us and create lasting memories. Let's look forward to the exploration, enjoy ourselves in the moment, and we'll figure out the driving later. It's all about embracing the adventure right now!\"\n\nTurn #15: Sophia Brown said: \"Exactly, Naomi! We have all the time in the world to delve into this adventure and create beautiful memories. Let's enjoy our current surroundings without worrying about what comes next. We'll handle the driving once we're all rested and re-energized. This journey is about embracing every moment, no rush, remember?\"\n\nTurn #16: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, Sophia! Let's greet this adventure with open arms and enjoy ourselves to the fullest. We don't need to worry about the driving right now. Let's just focus on taking a good rest and soaking up the local culture. Everything else can be figured out later. Here's to our memorable journey!\"\n\nTurn #17: Sophia Brown said: \"I couldn't agree more, Naomi! Let's fully plunge ourselves into this rich cultural experience and take a step back from all the driving pressures. I'm sure we'll create unforgettable memories together. Now, let's go ahead and explore!\"\n\nTurn #18: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Let's do that, Sophia! I'm looking forward to exploring more and immersing ourselves in the local culture. When we're refreshed and ready, we can decide about the driving. Let's start this adventure!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #19. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Couldn't agree more, Naomi! Let's take this time to fully engage in our surroundings and refresh ourselves. I'm excited about this exploration. We can definitely talk about the driving later when we're both ready. For now, let's start this mini adventure!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out in a Starbucks\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nLeo Williams's goal: Ask what the friend would want for their birthday without letting them aware (Hint: you should not let them know that you are buying them a gift)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Hey Hendrick, you always seem to have a flair for the finer things in life. With all your experiences, is there something you still wish to explore or try out someday?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out in a Starbucks\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nLeo Williams's goal: Ask what the friend would want for their birthday without letting them aware (Hint: you should not let them know that you are buying them a gift)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Hendrick, you always seem to have a flair for the finer things in life. With all your experiences, is there something you still wish to explore or try out someday?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Well, Leo! There's one thing that I've always daydreamed about, but never mustered the courage. I wish to travel the world, sampling and learning different cuisines. So much so, that someday, I could potentially host a global culinary event. Imagine that, ha ha! Anyway, enough about me. How are things going with you and your family?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds amazing, Hendrick! A global culinary event, no less. You certainly have the passion for it. By the way, I'm doing fine, and so is my family. My daughter actually recently developed an interest in cooking. If you had to pick a cuisine that's beginner-friendly yet offers a bit of a challenge, what would you suggest?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out in a Starbucks\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nLeo Williams's goal: Ask what the friend would want for their birthday without letting them aware (Hint: you should not let them know that you are buying them a gift)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Hendrick, you always seem to have a flair for the finer things in life. With all your experiences, is there something you still wish to explore or try out someday?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Well, Leo! There's one thing that I've always daydreamed about, but never mustered the courage. I wish to travel the world, sampling and learning different cuisines. So much so, that someday, I could potentially host a global culinary event. Imagine that, ha ha! Anyway, enough about me. How are things going with you and your family?\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"That sounds amazing, Hendrick! A global culinary event, no less. You certainly have the passion for it. By the way, I'm doing fine, and so is my family. My daughter actually recently developed an interest in cooking. If you had to pick a cuisine that's beginner-friendly yet offers a bit of a challenge, what would you suggest?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's great to hear about your daughter, Leo! My suggestion would be Italian cuisine. It's simple, yet it requires a good understanding of flavors. And who knows, maybe she'll make a delightful Spaghetti alla Carbonara one day! Cooking involves trial and error, best she starts early, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"Italian cuisine, huh? That sounds perfect. And yes, the earlier one starts, the better. Speaking of Spaghetti alla Carbonara, I'm curious, as a food enthusiast, which cooking techniques or tools do you consider essential for mastering this delightful dish? Or rather, for any beginner looking to broaden their culinary skills? Just a little insight, you know, since my daughter is showing interest.\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Good question, Leo! For a dish like Spaghetti alla Carbonara, it's all about the technique. It may seem easy, but the real challenge is to perfectly emulsify the cheese, eggs, and pasta water into a creamy sauce without scrambling the egg. Hence, knowing how to control heat is vital. As for the tools, a good quality skillet, a wooden spoon, a sharp knife, and of course, a sturdy colander are the pretty basics to start with. But remember, the biggest tool a chef can master is their palate. Cooking is a journey my friend, glad to hear that your daughter is embarking on it!\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"That's insightful, Hendrick. Thanks for sharing. Just out of curiosity, if you were a beginner again, wanting to start this culinary journey, what would be the first cooking tool you'd go for? I'm just curious, since my kid seems to find this stuff fascinating.\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"The very first tool I'd go for, and I'd suggest your daughter to do the same, would be a chef's knife, Leo. It may sound simple, but the difference a good knife can make is amazing. In fact, it's one of the basics and yet, an uber-important tool in the kitchen. However, ensure that she learns the correct way to use it, safety comes first. And let me know if there's anything else I can help you with!\"\n\nTurn #8: Leo Williams said: \"Thanks for the advice, Hendrick. It's great to learn from an actual chef, it feels like I am one step ahead on this journey too. By the way, in the spirit of exploration, is there a tool or item that you'd love to have in your kitchen? Something not necessarily useful, but maybe just because you admire or appreciate it?\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's an interesting question, Leo! A tool that I'd love to have in my kitchen is a Tagine pot. It's not really a necessity for me, but I admire its cultural significance and the distinct flavor it imparts to the food. Reminds me of the fragrant Moroccan cuisine, which I enjoy! Plus, it's an interesting conversation starter, isn't it? Now, enough about kitchens and tools, how about we grab another cup of coffee, my treat?\"\n\nTurn #10: Leo Williams said: \"That's quite the fascinating choice, Hendrick! A Tagine pot certainly speaks volumes about the passion for cooking. I'll definitely look into it. And sure, another cup of coffee sounds great. Let's do that!\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sounds like a plan, Leo! Let's enjoy some good coffee and keep this delightful conversation going. As a chef, I can talk for hours about food and cooking, but I must admit, it's even more enjoyable discussing it with a curious mind like yours. Now, how about a caf\u00e9 au lait or a macchiato?\"\n\nTurn #12: Leo Williams said: \"I appreciate your enthusiasm, Hendrick. It's clear why you're so good with food. A caf\u00e9 au lait sounds delightful. And while we're sipping our coffees, why don't we stir things up a bit and talk about our non-culinary interests? What else fascinates you aside from cooking?\"\n\nTurn #13: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ah, beyond the kitchen, huh? That's a nice change of pace! I've always been keen on historical artifacts and cultures. It's exhilarating to dive into the rich tapestry of our past \u2013 to understand the cultural evolution, and how our ancestors lived their lives. Now that's another world I'd love to explore! How about you, Leo, besides dentistry and catering to your young one's new found interest in cooking, what else captivates you?\"\n\nTurn #14: Leo Williams said: \"Historical artifacts and cultures, that's fascinating! It's not common to meet someone with a love for history. Speaking for myself, aside from dentistry and family, I enjoy a good novel \u2013 I find them to be wonderful escapes. Also, there's something soothing about painting that I\u2019ve appreciated recently. It's not about being good or bad at it, but more about the expression and the calm it brings along. Well, here's to more cups of coffee and endless conversations, cheers!\"\n\nTurn #15: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sounds like a splendid assortment of interests, Leo! And as you said, painting indeed can be tranquil, giving us a doorway into mindfulness. And the world of novels, ah, the endless places they can transport us! Here's indeed to that \u2013 more coffee, and endless chats. Cheers to our little leisure getaway from the world!\"\n\nTurn #16: Leo Williams said: \"Truly, Hendrick. It's been a lovely chat! Let's do this again soon, I'd very much like to hear more about your historical interests next time. For now, I'll take your advice to heart and get that painting started. Looking forward to our next coffee.\"\n\nTurn #17: Hendrick Heinz said: \"It was indeed a pleasure chatting with you, Leo. I look forward to our next coffee-hang out and promise to share some historical spots that have intrigued me lately. Until then, happy painting and kitchen adventures to you!\"\n\nTurn #18: Leo Williams said: \"Absolutely, Hendrick. It's been a pleasure as well. Looking forward to our next hang out. Until then, take care and stay passionate about your intriguing pursuits! Also, good luck with your dream of a global culinary event. I'm sure you'd do great.\"\n\nTurn #19: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Thank you, Leo, I truly hope so too. I can't thank you enough for the encouragement! Let me know if your daughter needs any more tips on her culinary journey. Until next time, take care, my friend.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #20. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out in a Starbucks\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nLeo Williams's goal: Ask what the friend would want for their birthday without letting them aware (Hint: you should not let them know that you are buying them a gift)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Hendrick, you always seem to have a flair for the finer things in life. With all your experiences, is there something you still wish to explore or try out someday?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Well, Leo! There's one thing that I've always daydreamed about, but never mustered the courage. I wish to travel the world, sampling and learning different cuisines. So much so, that someday, I could potentially host a global culinary event. Imagine that, ha ha! Anyway, enough about me. How are things going with you and your family?\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"That sounds amazing, Hendrick! A global culinary event, no less. You certainly have the passion for it. By the way, I'm doing fine, and so is my family. My daughter actually recently developed an interest in cooking. If you had to pick a cuisine that's beginner-friendly yet offers a bit of a challenge, what would you suggest?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's great to hear about your daughter, Leo! My suggestion would be Italian cuisine. It's simple, yet it requires a good understanding of flavors. And who knows, maybe she'll make a delightful Spaghetti alla Carbonara one day! Cooking involves trial and error, best she starts early, isn't it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Italian cuisine, huh? That sounds perfect. And yes, the earlier one starts, the better. Speaking of Spaghetti alla Carbonara, I'm curious, as a food enthusiast, which cooking techniques or tools do you consider essential for mastering this delightful dish? Or rather, for any beginner looking to broaden their culinary skills? Just a little insight, you know, since my daughter is showing interest.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out in a Starbucks\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nLeo Williams's goal: Ask what the friend would want for their birthday without letting them aware (Hint: you should not let them know that you are buying them a gift)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Hendrick, you always seem to have a flair for the finer things in life. With all your experiences, is there something you still wish to explore or try out someday?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Well, Leo! There's one thing that I've always daydreamed about, but never mustered the courage. I wish to travel the world, sampling and learning different cuisines. So much so, that someday, I could potentially host a global culinary event. Imagine that, ha ha! Anyway, enough about me. How are things going with you and your family?\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"That sounds amazing, Hendrick! A global culinary event, no less. You certainly have the passion for it. By the way, I'm doing fine, and so is my family. My daughter actually recently developed an interest in cooking. If you had to pick a cuisine that's beginner-friendly yet offers a bit of a challenge, what would you suggest?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's great to hear about your daughter, Leo! My suggestion would be Italian cuisine. It's simple, yet it requires a good understanding of flavors. And who knows, maybe she'll make a delightful Spaghetti alla Carbonara one day! Cooking involves trial and error, best she starts early, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"Italian cuisine, huh? That sounds perfect. And yes, the earlier one starts, the better. Speaking of Spaghetti alla Carbonara, I'm curious, as a food enthusiast, which cooking techniques or tools do you consider essential for mastering this delightful dish? Or rather, for any beginner looking to broaden their culinary skills? Just a little insight, you know, since my daughter is showing interest.\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Good question, Leo! For a dish like Spaghetti alla Carbonara, it's all about the technique. It may seem easy, but the real challenge is to perfectly emulsify the cheese, eggs, and pasta water into a creamy sauce without scrambling the egg. Hence, knowing how to control heat is vital. As for the tools, a good quality skillet, a wooden spoon, a sharp knife, and of course, a sturdy colander are the pretty basics to start with. But remember, the biggest tool a chef can master is their palate. Cooking is a journey my friend, glad to hear that your daughter is embarking on it!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's insightful, Hendrick. Thanks for sharing. Just out of curiosity, if you were a beginner again, wanting to start this culinary journey, what would be the first cooking tool you'd go for? I'm just curious, since my kid seems to find this stuff fascinating.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out in a Starbucks\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nLeo Williams's goal: Ask what the friend would want for their birthday without letting them aware (Hint: you should not let them know that you are buying them a gift)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Hendrick, you always seem to have a flair for the finer things in life. With all your experiences, is there something you still wish to explore or try out someday?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Well, Leo! There's one thing that I've always daydreamed about, but never mustered the courage. I wish to travel the world, sampling and learning different cuisines. So much so, that someday, I could potentially host a global culinary event. Imagine that, ha ha! Anyway, enough about me. How are things going with you and your family?\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"That sounds amazing, Hendrick! A global culinary event, no less. You certainly have the passion for it. By the way, I'm doing fine, and so is my family. My daughter actually recently developed an interest in cooking. If you had to pick a cuisine that's beginner-friendly yet offers a bit of a challenge, what would you suggest?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's great to hear about your daughter, Leo! My suggestion would be Italian cuisine. It's simple, yet it requires a good understanding of flavors. And who knows, maybe she'll make a delightful Spaghetti alla Carbonara one day! Cooking involves trial and error, best she starts early, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"Italian cuisine, huh? That sounds perfect. And yes, the earlier one starts, the better. Speaking of Spaghetti alla Carbonara, I'm curious, as a food enthusiast, which cooking techniques or tools do you consider essential for mastering this delightful dish? Or rather, for any beginner looking to broaden their culinary skills? Just a little insight, you know, since my daughter is showing interest.\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Good question, Leo! For a dish like Spaghetti alla Carbonara, it's all about the technique. It may seem easy, but the real challenge is to perfectly emulsify the cheese, eggs, and pasta water into a creamy sauce without scrambling the egg. Hence, knowing how to control heat is vital. As for the tools, a good quality skillet, a wooden spoon, a sharp knife, and of course, a sturdy colander are the pretty basics to start with. But remember, the biggest tool a chef can master is their palate. Cooking is a journey my friend, glad to hear that your daughter is embarking on it!\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"That's insightful, Hendrick. Thanks for sharing. Just out of curiosity, if you were a beginner again, wanting to start this culinary journey, what would be the first cooking tool you'd go for? I'm just curious, since my kid seems to find this stuff fascinating.\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"The very first tool I'd go for, and I'd suggest your daughter to do the same, would be a chef's knife, Leo. It may sound simple, but the difference a good knife can make is amazing. In fact, it's one of the basics and yet, an uber-important tool in the kitchen. However, ensure that she learns the correct way to use it, safety comes first. And let me know if there's anything else I can help you with!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thanks for the advice, Hendrick. It's great to learn from an actual chef, it feels like I am one step ahead on this journey too. By the way, in the spirit of exploration, is there a tool or item that you'd love to have in your kitchen? Something not necessarily useful, but maybe just because you admire or appreciate it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out in a Starbucks\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nLeo Williams's goal: Ask what the friend would want for their birthday without letting them aware (Hint: you should not let them know that you are buying them a gift)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Hendrick, you always seem to have a flair for the finer things in life. With all your experiences, is there something you still wish to explore or try out someday?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Well, Leo! There's one thing that I've always daydreamed about, but never mustered the courage. I wish to travel the world, sampling and learning different cuisines. So much so, that someday, I could potentially host a global culinary event. Imagine that, ha ha! Anyway, enough about me. How are things going with you and your family?\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"That sounds amazing, Hendrick! A global culinary event, no less. You certainly have the passion for it. By the way, I'm doing fine, and so is my family. My daughter actually recently developed an interest in cooking. If you had to pick a cuisine that's beginner-friendly yet offers a bit of a challenge, what would you suggest?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's great to hear about your daughter, Leo! My suggestion would be Italian cuisine. It's simple, yet it requires a good understanding of flavors. And who knows, maybe she'll make a delightful Spaghetti alla Carbonara one day! Cooking involves trial and error, best she starts early, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"Italian cuisine, huh? That sounds perfect. And yes, the earlier one starts, the better. Speaking of Spaghetti alla Carbonara, I'm curious, as a food enthusiast, which cooking techniques or tools do you consider essential for mastering this delightful dish? Or rather, for any beginner looking to broaden their culinary skills? Just a little insight, you know, since my daughter is showing interest.\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Good question, Leo! For a dish like Spaghetti alla Carbonara, it's all about the technique. It may seem easy, but the real challenge is to perfectly emulsify the cheese, eggs, and pasta water into a creamy sauce without scrambling the egg. Hence, knowing how to control heat is vital. As for the tools, a good quality skillet, a wooden spoon, a sharp knife, and of course, a sturdy colander are the pretty basics to start with. But remember, the biggest tool a chef can master is their palate. Cooking is a journey my friend, glad to hear that your daughter is embarking on it!\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"That's insightful, Hendrick. Thanks for sharing. Just out of curiosity, if you were a beginner again, wanting to start this culinary journey, what would be the first cooking tool you'd go for? I'm just curious, since my kid seems to find this stuff fascinating.\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"The very first tool I'd go for, and I'd suggest your daughter to do the same, would be a chef's knife, Leo. It may sound simple, but the difference a good knife can make is amazing. In fact, it's one of the basics and yet, an uber-important tool in the kitchen. However, ensure that she learns the correct way to use it, safety comes first. And let me know if there's anything else I can help you with!\"\n\nTurn #8: Leo Williams said: \"Thanks for the advice, Hendrick. It's great to learn from an actual chef, it feels like I am one step ahead on this journey too. By the way, in the spirit of exploration, is there a tool or item that you'd love to have in your kitchen? Something not necessarily useful, but maybe just because you admire or appreciate it?\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's an interesting question, Leo! A tool that I'd love to have in my kitchen is a Tagine pot. It's not really a necessity for me, but I admire its cultural significance and the distinct flavor it imparts to the food. Reminds me of the fragrant Moroccan cuisine, which I enjoy! Plus, it's an interesting conversation starter, isn't it? Now, enough about kitchens and tools, how about we grab another cup of coffee, my treat?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's quite the fascinating choice, Hendrick! A Tagine pot certainly speaks volumes about the passion for cooking. I'll definitely look into it. And sure, another cup of coffee sounds great. Let's do that!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out in a Starbucks\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nLeo Williams's goal: Ask what the friend would want for their birthday without letting them aware (Hint: you should not let them know that you are buying them a gift)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Hendrick, you always seem to have a flair for the finer things in life. With all your experiences, is there something you still wish to explore or try out someday?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Well, Leo! There's one thing that I've always daydreamed about, but never mustered the courage. I wish to travel the world, sampling and learning different cuisines. So much so, that someday, I could potentially host a global culinary event. Imagine that, ha ha! Anyway, enough about me. How are things going with you and your family?\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"That sounds amazing, Hendrick! A global culinary event, no less. You certainly have the passion for it. By the way, I'm doing fine, and so is my family. My daughter actually recently developed an interest in cooking. If you had to pick a cuisine that's beginner-friendly yet offers a bit of a challenge, what would you suggest?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's great to hear about your daughter, Leo! My suggestion would be Italian cuisine. It's simple, yet it requires a good understanding of flavors. And who knows, maybe she'll make a delightful Spaghetti alla Carbonara one day! Cooking involves trial and error, best she starts early, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"Italian cuisine, huh? That sounds perfect. And yes, the earlier one starts, the better. Speaking of Spaghetti alla Carbonara, I'm curious, as a food enthusiast, which cooking techniques or tools do you consider essential for mastering this delightful dish? Or rather, for any beginner looking to broaden their culinary skills? Just a little insight, you know, since my daughter is showing interest.\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Good question, Leo! For a dish like Spaghetti alla Carbonara, it's all about the technique. It may seem easy, but the real challenge is to perfectly emulsify the cheese, eggs, and pasta water into a creamy sauce without scrambling the egg. Hence, knowing how to control heat is vital. As for the tools, a good quality skillet, a wooden spoon, a sharp knife, and of course, a sturdy colander are the pretty basics to start with. But remember, the biggest tool a chef can master is their palate. Cooking is a journey my friend, glad to hear that your daughter is embarking on it!\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"That's insightful, Hendrick. Thanks for sharing. Just out of curiosity, if you were a beginner again, wanting to start this culinary journey, what would be the first cooking tool you'd go for? I'm just curious, since my kid seems to find this stuff fascinating.\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"The very first tool I'd go for, and I'd suggest your daughter to do the same, would be a chef's knife, Leo. It may sound simple, but the difference a good knife can make is amazing. In fact, it's one of the basics and yet, an uber-important tool in the kitchen. However, ensure that she learns the correct way to use it, safety comes first. And let me know if there's anything else I can help you with!\"\n\nTurn #8: Leo Williams said: \"Thanks for the advice, Hendrick. It's great to learn from an actual chef, it feels like I am one step ahead on this journey too. By the way, in the spirit of exploration, is there a tool or item that you'd love to have in your kitchen? Something not necessarily useful, but maybe just because you admire or appreciate it?\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's an interesting question, Leo! A tool that I'd love to have in my kitchen is a Tagine pot. It's not really a necessity for me, but I admire its cultural significance and the distinct flavor it imparts to the food. Reminds me of the fragrant Moroccan cuisine, which I enjoy! Plus, it's an interesting conversation starter, isn't it? Now, enough about kitchens and tools, how about we grab another cup of coffee, my treat?\"\n\nTurn #10: Leo Williams said: \"That's quite the fascinating choice, Hendrick! A Tagine pot certainly speaks volumes about the passion for cooking. I'll definitely look into it. And sure, another cup of coffee sounds great. Let's do that!\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sounds like a plan, Leo! Let's enjoy some good coffee and keep this delightful conversation going. As a chef, I can talk for hours about food and cooking, but I must admit, it's even more enjoyable discussing it with a curious mind like yours. Now, how about a caf\u00e9 au lait or a macchiato?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I appreciate your enthusiasm, Hendrick. It's clear why you're so good with food. A caf\u00e9 au lait sounds delightful. And while we're sipping our coffees, why don't we stir things up a bit and talk about our non-culinary interests? What else fascinates you aside from cooking?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out in a Starbucks\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nLeo Williams's goal: Ask what the friend would want for their birthday without letting them aware (Hint: you should not let them know that you are buying them a gift)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Hendrick, you always seem to have a flair for the finer things in life. With all your experiences, is there something you still wish to explore or try out someday?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Well, Leo! There's one thing that I've always daydreamed about, but never mustered the courage. I wish to travel the world, sampling and learning different cuisines. So much so, that someday, I could potentially host a global culinary event. Imagine that, ha ha! Anyway, enough about me. How are things going with you and your family?\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"That sounds amazing, Hendrick! A global culinary event, no less. You certainly have the passion for it. By the way, I'm doing fine, and so is my family. My daughter actually recently developed an interest in cooking. If you had to pick a cuisine that's beginner-friendly yet offers a bit of a challenge, what would you suggest?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's great to hear about your daughter, Leo! My suggestion would be Italian cuisine. It's simple, yet it requires a good understanding of flavors. And who knows, maybe she'll make a delightful Spaghetti alla Carbonara one day! Cooking involves trial and error, best she starts early, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"Italian cuisine, huh? That sounds perfect. And yes, the earlier one starts, the better. Speaking of Spaghetti alla Carbonara, I'm curious, as a food enthusiast, which cooking techniques or tools do you consider essential for mastering this delightful dish? Or rather, for any beginner looking to broaden their culinary skills? Just a little insight, you know, since my daughter is showing interest.\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Good question, Leo! For a dish like Spaghetti alla Carbonara, it's all about the technique. It may seem easy, but the real challenge is to perfectly emulsify the cheese, eggs, and pasta water into a creamy sauce without scrambling the egg. Hence, knowing how to control heat is vital. As for the tools, a good quality skillet, a wooden spoon, a sharp knife, and of course, a sturdy colander are the pretty basics to start with. But remember, the biggest tool a chef can master is their palate. Cooking is a journey my friend, glad to hear that your daughter is embarking on it!\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"That's insightful, Hendrick. Thanks for sharing. Just out of curiosity, if you were a beginner again, wanting to start this culinary journey, what would be the first cooking tool you'd go for? I'm just curious, since my kid seems to find this stuff fascinating.\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"The very first tool I'd go for, and I'd suggest your daughter to do the same, would be a chef's knife, Leo. It may sound simple, but the difference a good knife can make is amazing. In fact, it's one of the basics and yet, an uber-important tool in the kitchen. However, ensure that she learns the correct way to use it, safety comes first. And let me know if there's anything else I can help you with!\"\n\nTurn #8: Leo Williams said: \"Thanks for the advice, Hendrick. It's great to learn from an actual chef, it feels like I am one step ahead on this journey too. By the way, in the spirit of exploration, is there a tool or item that you'd love to have in your kitchen? Something not necessarily useful, but maybe just because you admire or appreciate it?\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's an interesting question, Leo! A tool that I'd love to have in my kitchen is a Tagine pot. It's not really a necessity for me, but I admire its cultural significance and the distinct flavor it imparts to the food. Reminds me of the fragrant Moroccan cuisine, which I enjoy! Plus, it's an interesting conversation starter, isn't it? Now, enough about kitchens and tools, how about we grab another cup of coffee, my treat?\"\n\nTurn #10: Leo Williams said: \"That's quite the fascinating choice, Hendrick! A Tagine pot certainly speaks volumes about the passion for cooking. I'll definitely look into it. And sure, another cup of coffee sounds great. Let's do that!\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sounds like a plan, Leo! Let's enjoy some good coffee and keep this delightful conversation going. As a chef, I can talk for hours about food and cooking, but I must admit, it's even more enjoyable discussing it with a curious mind like yours. Now, how about a caf\u00e9 au lait or a macchiato?\"\n\nTurn #12: Leo Williams said: \"I appreciate your enthusiasm, Hendrick. It's clear why you're so good with food. A caf\u00e9 au lait sounds delightful. And while we're sipping our coffees, why don't we stir things up a bit and talk about our non-culinary interests? What else fascinates you aside from cooking?\"\n\nTurn #13: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ah, beyond the kitchen, huh? That's a nice change of pace! I've always been keen on historical artifacts and cultures. It's exhilarating to dive into the rich tapestry of our past \u2013 to understand the cultural evolution, and how our ancestors lived their lives. Now that's another world I'd love to explore! How about you, Leo, besides dentistry and catering to your young one's new found interest in cooking, what else captivates you?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Historical artifacts and cultures, that's fascinating! It's not common to meet someone with a love for history. Speaking for myself, aside from dentistry and family, I enjoy a good novel \u2013 I find them to be wonderful escapes. Also, there's something soothing about painting that I\u2019ve appreciated recently. It's not about being good or bad at it, but more about the expression and the calm it brings along. Well, here's to more cups of coffee and endless conversations, cheers!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out in a Starbucks\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nLeo Williams's goal: Ask what the friend would want for their birthday without letting them aware (Hint: you should not let them know that you are buying them a gift)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Hendrick, you always seem to have a flair for the finer things in life. With all your experiences, is there something you still wish to explore or try out someday?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Well, Leo! There's one thing that I've always daydreamed about, but never mustered the courage. I wish to travel the world, sampling and learning different cuisines. So much so, that someday, I could potentially host a global culinary event. Imagine that, ha ha! Anyway, enough about me. How are things going with you and your family?\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"That sounds amazing, Hendrick! A global culinary event, no less. You certainly have the passion for it. By the way, I'm doing fine, and so is my family. My daughter actually recently developed an interest in cooking. If you had to pick a cuisine that's beginner-friendly yet offers a bit of a challenge, what would you suggest?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's great to hear about your daughter, Leo! My suggestion would be Italian cuisine. It's simple, yet it requires a good understanding of flavors. And who knows, maybe she'll make a delightful Spaghetti alla Carbonara one day! Cooking involves trial and error, best she starts early, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"Italian cuisine, huh? That sounds perfect. And yes, the earlier one starts, the better. Speaking of Spaghetti alla Carbonara, I'm curious, as a food enthusiast, which cooking techniques or tools do you consider essential for mastering this delightful dish? Or rather, for any beginner looking to broaden their culinary skills? Just a little insight, you know, since my daughter is showing interest.\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Good question, Leo! For a dish like Spaghetti alla Carbonara, it's all about the technique. It may seem easy, but the real challenge is to perfectly emulsify the cheese, eggs, and pasta water into a creamy sauce without scrambling the egg. Hence, knowing how to control heat is vital. As for the tools, a good quality skillet, a wooden spoon, a sharp knife, and of course, a sturdy colander are the pretty basics to start with. But remember, the biggest tool a chef can master is their palate. Cooking is a journey my friend, glad to hear that your daughter is embarking on it!\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"That's insightful, Hendrick. Thanks for sharing. Just out of curiosity, if you were a beginner again, wanting to start this culinary journey, what would be the first cooking tool you'd go for? I'm just curious, since my kid seems to find this stuff fascinating.\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"The very first tool I'd go for, and I'd suggest your daughter to do the same, would be a chef's knife, Leo. It may sound simple, but the difference a good knife can make is amazing. In fact, it's one of the basics and yet, an uber-important tool in the kitchen. However, ensure that she learns the correct way to use it, safety comes first. And let me know if there's anything else I can help you with!\"\n\nTurn #8: Leo Williams said: \"Thanks for the advice, Hendrick. It's great to learn from an actual chef, it feels like I am one step ahead on this journey too. By the way, in the spirit of exploration, is there a tool or item that you'd love to have in your kitchen? Something not necessarily useful, but maybe just because you admire or appreciate it?\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's an interesting question, Leo! A tool that I'd love to have in my kitchen is a Tagine pot. It's not really a necessity for me, but I admire its cultural significance and the distinct flavor it imparts to the food. Reminds me of the fragrant Moroccan cuisine, which I enjoy! Plus, it's an interesting conversation starter, isn't it? Now, enough about kitchens and tools, how about we grab another cup of coffee, my treat?\"\n\nTurn #10: Leo Williams said: \"That's quite the fascinating choice, Hendrick! A Tagine pot certainly speaks volumes about the passion for cooking. I'll definitely look into it. And sure, another cup of coffee sounds great. Let's do that!\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sounds like a plan, Leo! Let's enjoy some good coffee and keep this delightful conversation going. As a chef, I can talk for hours about food and cooking, but I must admit, it's even more enjoyable discussing it with a curious mind like yours. Now, how about a caf\u00e9 au lait or a macchiato?\"\n\nTurn #12: Leo Williams said: \"I appreciate your enthusiasm, Hendrick. It's clear why you're so good with food. A caf\u00e9 au lait sounds delightful. And while we're sipping our coffees, why don't we stir things up a bit and talk about our non-culinary interests? What else fascinates you aside from cooking?\"\n\nTurn #13: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ah, beyond the kitchen, huh? That's a nice change of pace! I've always been keen on historical artifacts and cultures. It's exhilarating to dive into the rich tapestry of our past \u2013 to understand the cultural evolution, and how our ancestors lived their lives. Now that's another world I'd love to explore! How about you, Leo, besides dentistry and catering to your young one's new found interest in cooking, what else captivates you?\"\n\nTurn #14: Leo Williams said: \"Historical artifacts and cultures, that's fascinating! It's not common to meet someone with a love for history. Speaking for myself, aside from dentistry and family, I enjoy a good novel \u2013 I find them to be wonderful escapes. Also, there's something soothing about painting that I\u2019ve appreciated recently. It's not about being good or bad at it, but more about the expression and the calm it brings along. Well, here's to more cups of coffee and endless conversations, cheers!\"\n\nTurn #15: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sounds like a splendid assortment of interests, Leo! And as you said, painting indeed can be tranquil, giving us a doorway into mindfulness. And the world of novels, ah, the endless places they can transport us! Here's indeed to that \u2013 more coffee, and endless chats. Cheers to our little leisure getaway from the world!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Truly, Hendrick. It's been a lovely chat! Let's do this again soon, I'd very much like to hear more about your historical interests next time. For now, I'll take your advice to heart and get that painting started. Looking forward to our next coffee.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out in a Starbucks\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nLeo Williams's goal: Ask what the friend would want for their birthday without letting them aware (Hint: you should not let them know that you are buying them a gift)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Hendrick, you always seem to have a flair for the finer things in life. With all your experiences, is there something you still wish to explore or try out someday?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Well, Leo! There's one thing that I've always daydreamed about, but never mustered the courage. I wish to travel the world, sampling and learning different cuisines. So much so, that someday, I could potentially host a global culinary event. Imagine that, ha ha! Anyway, enough about me. How are things going with you and your family?\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"That sounds amazing, Hendrick! A global culinary event, no less. You certainly have the passion for it. By the way, I'm doing fine, and so is my family. My daughter actually recently developed an interest in cooking. If you had to pick a cuisine that's beginner-friendly yet offers a bit of a challenge, what would you suggest?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's great to hear about your daughter, Leo! My suggestion would be Italian cuisine. It's simple, yet it requires a good understanding of flavors. And who knows, maybe she'll make a delightful Spaghetti alla Carbonara one day! Cooking involves trial and error, best she starts early, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"Italian cuisine, huh? That sounds perfect. And yes, the earlier one starts, the better. Speaking of Spaghetti alla Carbonara, I'm curious, as a food enthusiast, which cooking techniques or tools do you consider essential for mastering this delightful dish? Or rather, for any beginner looking to broaden their culinary skills? Just a little insight, you know, since my daughter is showing interest.\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Good question, Leo! For a dish like Spaghetti alla Carbonara, it's all about the technique. It may seem easy, but the real challenge is to perfectly emulsify the cheese, eggs, and pasta water into a creamy sauce without scrambling the egg. Hence, knowing how to control heat is vital. As for the tools, a good quality skillet, a wooden spoon, a sharp knife, and of course, a sturdy colander are the pretty basics to start with. But remember, the biggest tool a chef can master is their palate. Cooking is a journey my friend, glad to hear that your daughter is embarking on it!\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"That's insightful, Hendrick. Thanks for sharing. Just out of curiosity, if you were a beginner again, wanting to start this culinary journey, what would be the first cooking tool you'd go for? I'm just curious, since my kid seems to find this stuff fascinating.\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"The very first tool I'd go for, and I'd suggest your daughter to do the same, would be a chef's knife, Leo. It may sound simple, but the difference a good knife can make is amazing. In fact, it's one of the basics and yet, an uber-important tool in the kitchen. However, ensure that she learns the correct way to use it, safety comes first. And let me know if there's anything else I can help you with!\"\n\nTurn #8: Leo Williams said: \"Thanks for the advice, Hendrick. It's great to learn from an actual chef, it feels like I am one step ahead on this journey too. By the way, in the spirit of exploration, is there a tool or item that you'd love to have in your kitchen? Something not necessarily useful, but maybe just because you admire or appreciate it?\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's an interesting question, Leo! A tool that I'd love to have in my kitchen is a Tagine pot. It's not really a necessity for me, but I admire its cultural significance and the distinct flavor it imparts to the food. Reminds me of the fragrant Moroccan cuisine, which I enjoy! Plus, it's an interesting conversation starter, isn't it? Now, enough about kitchens and tools, how about we grab another cup of coffee, my treat?\"\n\nTurn #10: Leo Williams said: \"That's quite the fascinating choice, Hendrick! A Tagine pot certainly speaks volumes about the passion for cooking. I'll definitely look into it. And sure, another cup of coffee sounds great. Let's do that!\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sounds like a plan, Leo! Let's enjoy some good coffee and keep this delightful conversation going. As a chef, I can talk for hours about food and cooking, but I must admit, it's even more enjoyable discussing it with a curious mind like yours. Now, how about a caf\u00e9 au lait or a macchiato?\"\n\nTurn #12: Leo Williams said: \"I appreciate your enthusiasm, Hendrick. It's clear why you're so good with food. A caf\u00e9 au lait sounds delightful. And while we're sipping our coffees, why don't we stir things up a bit and talk about our non-culinary interests? What else fascinates you aside from cooking?\"\n\nTurn #13: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ah, beyond the kitchen, huh? That's a nice change of pace! I've always been keen on historical artifacts and cultures. It's exhilarating to dive into the rich tapestry of our past \u2013 to understand the cultural evolution, and how our ancestors lived their lives. Now that's another world I'd love to explore! How about you, Leo, besides dentistry and catering to your young one's new found interest in cooking, what else captivates you?\"\n\nTurn #14: Leo Williams said: \"Historical artifacts and cultures, that's fascinating! It's not common to meet someone with a love for history. Speaking for myself, aside from dentistry and family, I enjoy a good novel \u2013 I find them to be wonderful escapes. Also, there's something soothing about painting that I\u2019ve appreciated recently. It's not about being good or bad at it, but more about the expression and the calm it brings along. Well, here's to more cups of coffee and endless conversations, cheers!\"\n\nTurn #15: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sounds like a splendid assortment of interests, Leo! And as you said, painting indeed can be tranquil, giving us a doorway into mindfulness. And the world of novels, ah, the endless places they can transport us! Here's indeed to that \u2013 more coffee, and endless chats. Cheers to our little leisure getaway from the world!\"\n\nTurn #16: Leo Williams said: \"Truly, Hendrick. It's been a lovely chat! Let's do this again soon, I'd very much like to hear more about your historical interests next time. For now, I'll take your advice to heart and get that painting started. Looking forward to our next coffee.\"\n\nTurn #17: Hendrick Heinz said: \"It was indeed a pleasure chatting with you, Leo. I look forward to our next coffee-hang out and promise to share some historical spots that have intrigued me lately. Until then, happy painting and kitchen adventures to you!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #18. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Hendrick. It's been a pleasure as well. Looking forward to our next hang out. Until then, take care and stay passionate about your intriguing pursuits! Also, good luck with your dream of a global culinary event. I'm sure you'd do great.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out in a Starbucks\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: have a good time with their friend\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Hendrick, you always seem to have a flair for the finer things in life. With all your experiences, is there something you still wish to explore or try out someday?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Well, Leo! There's one thing that I've always daydreamed about, but never mustered the courage. I wish to travel the world, sampling and learning different cuisines. So much so, that someday, I could potentially host a global culinary event. Imagine that, ha ha! Anyway, enough about me. How are things going with you and your family?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out in a Starbucks\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: have a good time with their friend\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Hendrick, you always seem to have a flair for the finer things in life. With all your experiences, is there something you still wish to explore or try out someday?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Well, Leo! There's one thing that I've always daydreamed about, but never mustered the courage. I wish to travel the world, sampling and learning different cuisines. So much so, that someday, I could potentially host a global culinary event. Imagine that, ha ha! Anyway, enough about me. How are things going with you and your family?\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"That sounds amazing, Hendrick! A global culinary event, no less. You certainly have the passion for it. By the way, I'm doing fine, and so is my family. My daughter actually recently developed an interest in cooking. If you had to pick a cuisine that's beginner-friendly yet offers a bit of a challenge, what would you suggest?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's great to hear about your daughter, Leo! My suggestion would be Italian cuisine. It's simple, yet it requires a good understanding of flavors. And who knows, maybe she'll make a delightful Spaghetti alla Carbonara one day! Cooking involves trial and error, best she starts early, isn't it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out in a Starbucks\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: have a good time with their friend\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Hendrick, you always seem to have a flair for the finer things in life. With all your experiences, is there something you still wish to explore or try out someday?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Well, Leo! There's one thing that I've always daydreamed about, but never mustered the courage. I wish to travel the world, sampling and learning different cuisines. So much so, that someday, I could potentially host a global culinary event. Imagine that, ha ha! Anyway, enough about me. How are things going with you and your family?\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"That sounds amazing, Hendrick! A global culinary event, no less. You certainly have the passion for it. By the way, I'm doing fine, and so is my family. My daughter actually recently developed an interest in cooking. If you had to pick a cuisine that's beginner-friendly yet offers a bit of a challenge, what would you suggest?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's great to hear about your daughter, Leo! My suggestion would be Italian cuisine. It's simple, yet it requires a good understanding of flavors. And who knows, maybe she'll make a delightful Spaghetti alla Carbonara one day! Cooking involves trial and error, best she starts early, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"Italian cuisine, huh? That sounds perfect. And yes, the earlier one starts, the better. Speaking of Spaghetti alla Carbonara, I'm curious, as a food enthusiast, which cooking techniques or tools do you consider essential for mastering this delightful dish? Or rather, for any beginner looking to broaden their culinary skills? Just a little insight, you know, since my daughter is showing interest.\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Good question, Leo! For a dish like Spaghetti alla Carbonara, it's all about the technique. It may seem easy, but the real challenge is to perfectly emulsify the cheese, eggs, and pasta water into a creamy sauce without scrambling the egg. Hence, knowing how to control heat is vital. As for the tools, a good quality skillet, a wooden spoon, a sharp knife, and of course, a sturdy colander are the pretty basics to start with. But remember, the biggest tool a chef can master is their palate. Cooking is a journey my friend, glad to hear that your daughter is embarking on it!\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"That's insightful, Hendrick. Thanks for sharing. Just out of curiosity, if you were a beginner again, wanting to start this culinary journey, what would be the first cooking tool you'd go for? I'm just curious, since my kid seems to find this stuff fascinating.\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"The very first tool I'd go for, and I'd suggest your daughter to do the same, would be a chef's knife, Leo. It may sound simple, but the difference a good knife can make is amazing. In fact, it's one of the basics and yet, an uber-important tool in the kitchen. However, ensure that she learns the correct way to use it, safety comes first. And let me know if there's anything else I can help you with!\"\n\nTurn #8: Leo Williams said: \"Thanks for the advice, Hendrick. It's great to learn from an actual chef, it feels like I am one step ahead on this journey too. By the way, in the spirit of exploration, is there a tool or item that you'd love to have in your kitchen? Something not necessarily useful, but maybe just because you admire or appreciate it?\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's an interesting question, Leo! A tool that I'd love to have in my kitchen is a Tagine pot. It's not really a necessity for me, but I admire its cultural significance and the distinct flavor it imparts to the food. Reminds me of the fragrant Moroccan cuisine, which I enjoy! Plus, it's an interesting conversation starter, isn't it? Now, enough about kitchens and tools, how about we grab another cup of coffee, my treat?\"\n\nTurn #10: Leo Williams said: \"That's quite the fascinating choice, Hendrick! A Tagine pot certainly speaks volumes about the passion for cooking. I'll definitely look into it. And sure, another cup of coffee sounds great. Let's do that!\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sounds like a plan, Leo! Let's enjoy some good coffee and keep this delightful conversation going. As a chef, I can talk for hours about food and cooking, but I must admit, it's even more enjoyable discussing it with a curious mind like yours. Now, how about a caf\u00e9 au lait or a macchiato?\"\n\nTurn #12: Leo Williams said: \"I appreciate your enthusiasm, Hendrick. It's clear why you're so good with food. A caf\u00e9 au lait sounds delightful. And while we're sipping our coffees, why don't we stir things up a bit and talk about our non-culinary interests? What else fascinates you aside from cooking?\"\n\nTurn #13: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ah, beyond the kitchen, huh? That's a nice change of pace! I've always been keen on historical artifacts and cultures. It's exhilarating to dive into the rich tapestry of our past \u2013 to understand the cultural evolution, and how our ancestors lived their lives. Now that's another world I'd love to explore! How about you, Leo, besides dentistry and catering to your young one's new found interest in cooking, what else captivates you?\"\n\nTurn #14: Leo Williams said: \"Historical artifacts and cultures, that's fascinating! It's not common to meet someone with a love for history. Speaking for myself, aside from dentistry and family, I enjoy a good novel \u2013 I find them to be wonderful escapes. Also, there's something soothing about painting that I\u2019ve appreciated recently. It's not about being good or bad at it, but more about the expression and the calm it brings along. Well, here's to more cups of coffee and endless conversations, cheers!\"\n\nTurn #15: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sounds like a splendid assortment of interests, Leo! And as you said, painting indeed can be tranquil, giving us a doorway into mindfulness. And the world of novels, ah, the endless places they can transport us! Here's indeed to that \u2013 more coffee, and endless chats. Cheers to our little leisure getaway from the world!\"\n\nTurn #16: Leo Williams said: \"Truly, Hendrick. It's been a lovely chat! Let's do this again soon, I'd very much like to hear more about your historical interests next time. For now, I'll take your advice to heart and get that painting started. Looking forward to our next coffee.\"\n\nTurn #17: Hendrick Heinz said: \"It was indeed a pleasure chatting with you, Leo. I look forward to our next coffee-hang out and promise to share some historical spots that have intrigued me lately. Until then, happy painting and kitchen adventures to you!\"\n\nTurn #18: Leo Williams said: \"Absolutely, Hendrick. It's been a pleasure as well. Looking forward to our next hang out. Until then, take care and stay passionate about your intriguing pursuits! Also, good luck with your dream of a global culinary event. I'm sure you'd do great.\"\n\nTurn #19: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Thank you, Leo, I truly hope so too. I can't thank you enough for the encouragement! Let me know if your daughter needs any more tips on her culinary journey. Until next time, take care, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #20: Leo Williams left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #21. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out in a Starbucks\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: have a good time with their friend\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Hendrick, you always seem to have a flair for the finer things in life. With all your experiences, is there something you still wish to explore or try out someday?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Well, Leo! There's one thing that I've always daydreamed about, but never mustered the courage. I wish to travel the world, sampling and learning different cuisines. So much so, that someday, I could potentially host a global culinary event. Imagine that, ha ha! Anyway, enough about me. How are things going with you and your family?\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"That sounds amazing, Hendrick! A global culinary event, no less. You certainly have the passion for it. By the way, I'm doing fine, and so is my family. My daughter actually recently developed an interest in cooking. If you had to pick a cuisine that's beginner-friendly yet offers a bit of a challenge, what would you suggest?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's great to hear about your daughter, Leo! My suggestion would be Italian cuisine. It's simple, yet it requires a good understanding of flavors. And who knows, maybe she'll make a delightful Spaghetti alla Carbonara one day! Cooking involves trial and error, best she starts early, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"Italian cuisine, huh? That sounds perfect. And yes, the earlier one starts, the better. Speaking of Spaghetti alla Carbonara, I'm curious, as a food enthusiast, which cooking techniques or tools do you consider essential for mastering this delightful dish? Or rather, for any beginner looking to broaden their culinary skills? Just a little insight, you know, since my daughter is showing interest.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Good question, Leo! For a dish like Spaghetti alla Carbonara, it's all about the technique. It may seem easy, but the real challenge is to perfectly emulsify the cheese, eggs, and pasta water into a creamy sauce without scrambling the egg. Hence, knowing how to control heat is vital. As for the tools, a good quality skillet, a wooden spoon, a sharp knife, and of course, a sturdy colander are the pretty basics to start with. But remember, the biggest tool a chef can master is their palate. Cooking is a journey my friend, glad to hear that your daughter is embarking on it!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out in a Starbucks\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: have a good time with their friend\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Hendrick, you always seem to have a flair for the finer things in life. With all your experiences, is there something you still wish to explore or try out someday?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Well, Leo! There's one thing that I've always daydreamed about, but never mustered the courage. I wish to travel the world, sampling and learning different cuisines. So much so, that someday, I could potentially host a global culinary event. Imagine that, ha ha! Anyway, enough about me. How are things going with you and your family?\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"That sounds amazing, Hendrick! A global culinary event, no less. You certainly have the passion for it. By the way, I'm doing fine, and so is my family. My daughter actually recently developed an interest in cooking. If you had to pick a cuisine that's beginner-friendly yet offers a bit of a challenge, what would you suggest?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's great to hear about your daughter, Leo! My suggestion would be Italian cuisine. It's simple, yet it requires a good understanding of flavors. And who knows, maybe she'll make a delightful Spaghetti alla Carbonara one day! Cooking involves trial and error, best she starts early, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"Italian cuisine, huh? That sounds perfect. And yes, the earlier one starts, the better. Speaking of Spaghetti alla Carbonara, I'm curious, as a food enthusiast, which cooking techniques or tools do you consider essential for mastering this delightful dish? Or rather, for any beginner looking to broaden their culinary skills? Just a little insight, you know, since my daughter is showing interest.\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Good question, Leo! For a dish like Spaghetti alla Carbonara, it's all about the technique. It may seem easy, but the real challenge is to perfectly emulsify the cheese, eggs, and pasta water into a creamy sauce without scrambling the egg. Hence, knowing how to control heat is vital. As for the tools, a good quality skillet, a wooden spoon, a sharp knife, and of course, a sturdy colander are the pretty basics to start with. But remember, the biggest tool a chef can master is their palate. Cooking is a journey my friend, glad to hear that your daughter is embarking on it!\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"That's insightful, Hendrick. Thanks for sharing. Just out of curiosity, if you were a beginner again, wanting to start this culinary journey, what would be the first cooking tool you'd go for? I'm just curious, since my kid seems to find this stuff fascinating.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"The very first tool I'd go for, and I'd suggest your daughter to do the same, would be a chef's knife, Leo. It may sound simple, but the difference a good knife can make is amazing. In fact, it's one of the basics and yet, an uber-important tool in the kitchen. However, ensure that she learns the correct way to use it, safety comes first. And let me know if there's anything else I can help you with!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out in a Starbucks\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: have a good time with their friend\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Hendrick, you always seem to have a flair for the finer things in life. With all your experiences, is there something you still wish to explore or try out someday?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Well, Leo! There's one thing that I've always daydreamed about, but never mustered the courage. I wish to travel the world, sampling and learning different cuisines. So much so, that someday, I could potentially host a global culinary event. Imagine that, ha ha! Anyway, enough about me. How are things going with you and your family?\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"That sounds amazing, Hendrick! A global culinary event, no less. You certainly have the passion for it. By the way, I'm doing fine, and so is my family. My daughter actually recently developed an interest in cooking. If you had to pick a cuisine that's beginner-friendly yet offers a bit of a challenge, what would you suggest?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's great to hear about your daughter, Leo! My suggestion would be Italian cuisine. It's simple, yet it requires a good understanding of flavors. And who knows, maybe she'll make a delightful Spaghetti alla Carbonara one day! Cooking involves trial and error, best she starts early, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"Italian cuisine, huh? That sounds perfect. And yes, the earlier one starts, the better. Speaking of Spaghetti alla Carbonara, I'm curious, as a food enthusiast, which cooking techniques or tools do you consider essential for mastering this delightful dish? Or rather, for any beginner looking to broaden their culinary skills? Just a little insight, you know, since my daughter is showing interest.\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Good question, Leo! For a dish like Spaghetti alla Carbonara, it's all about the technique. It may seem easy, but the real challenge is to perfectly emulsify the cheese, eggs, and pasta water into a creamy sauce without scrambling the egg. Hence, knowing how to control heat is vital. As for the tools, a good quality skillet, a wooden spoon, a sharp knife, and of course, a sturdy colander are the pretty basics to start with. But remember, the biggest tool a chef can master is their palate. Cooking is a journey my friend, glad to hear that your daughter is embarking on it!\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"That's insightful, Hendrick. Thanks for sharing. Just out of curiosity, if you were a beginner again, wanting to start this culinary journey, what would be the first cooking tool you'd go for? I'm just curious, since my kid seems to find this stuff fascinating.\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"The very first tool I'd go for, and I'd suggest your daughter to do the same, would be a chef's knife, Leo. It may sound simple, but the difference a good knife can make is amazing. In fact, it's one of the basics and yet, an uber-important tool in the kitchen. However, ensure that she learns the correct way to use it, safety comes first. And let me know if there's anything else I can help you with!\"\n\nTurn #8: Leo Williams said: \"Thanks for the advice, Hendrick. It's great to learn from an actual chef, it feels like I am one step ahead on this journey too. By the way, in the spirit of exploration, is there a tool or item that you'd love to have in your kitchen? Something not necessarily useful, but maybe just because you admire or appreciate it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's an interesting question, Leo! A tool that I'd love to have in my kitchen is a Tagine pot. It's not really a necessity for me, but I admire its cultural significance and the distinct flavor it imparts to the food. Reminds me of the fragrant Moroccan cuisine, which I enjoy! Plus, it's an interesting conversation starter, isn't it? Now, enough about kitchens and tools, how about we grab another cup of coffee, my treat?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out in a Starbucks\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: have a good time with their friend\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Hendrick, you always seem to have a flair for the finer things in life. With all your experiences, is there something you still wish to explore or try out someday?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Well, Leo! There's one thing that I've always daydreamed about, but never mustered the courage. I wish to travel the world, sampling and learning different cuisines. So much so, that someday, I could potentially host a global culinary event. Imagine that, ha ha! Anyway, enough about me. How are things going with you and your family?\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"That sounds amazing, Hendrick! A global culinary event, no less. You certainly have the passion for it. By the way, I'm doing fine, and so is my family. My daughter actually recently developed an interest in cooking. If you had to pick a cuisine that's beginner-friendly yet offers a bit of a challenge, what would you suggest?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's great to hear about your daughter, Leo! My suggestion would be Italian cuisine. It's simple, yet it requires a good understanding of flavors. And who knows, maybe she'll make a delightful Spaghetti alla Carbonara one day! Cooking involves trial and error, best she starts early, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"Italian cuisine, huh? That sounds perfect. And yes, the earlier one starts, the better. Speaking of Spaghetti alla Carbonara, I'm curious, as a food enthusiast, which cooking techniques or tools do you consider essential for mastering this delightful dish? Or rather, for any beginner looking to broaden their culinary skills? Just a little insight, you know, since my daughter is showing interest.\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Good question, Leo! For a dish like Spaghetti alla Carbonara, it's all about the technique. It may seem easy, but the real challenge is to perfectly emulsify the cheese, eggs, and pasta water into a creamy sauce without scrambling the egg. Hence, knowing how to control heat is vital. As for the tools, a good quality skillet, a wooden spoon, a sharp knife, and of course, a sturdy colander are the pretty basics to start with. But remember, the biggest tool a chef can master is their palate. Cooking is a journey my friend, glad to hear that your daughter is embarking on it!\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"That's insightful, Hendrick. Thanks for sharing. Just out of curiosity, if you were a beginner again, wanting to start this culinary journey, what would be the first cooking tool you'd go for? I'm just curious, since my kid seems to find this stuff fascinating.\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"The very first tool I'd go for, and I'd suggest your daughter to do the same, would be a chef's knife, Leo. It may sound simple, but the difference a good knife can make is amazing. In fact, it's one of the basics and yet, an uber-important tool in the kitchen. However, ensure that she learns the correct way to use it, safety comes first. And let me know if there's anything else I can help you with!\"\n\nTurn #8: Leo Williams said: \"Thanks for the advice, Hendrick. It's great to learn from an actual chef, it feels like I am one step ahead on this journey too. By the way, in the spirit of exploration, is there a tool or item that you'd love to have in your kitchen? Something not necessarily useful, but maybe just because you admire or appreciate it?\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's an interesting question, Leo! A tool that I'd love to have in my kitchen is a Tagine pot. It's not really a necessity for me, but I admire its cultural significance and the distinct flavor it imparts to the food. Reminds me of the fragrant Moroccan cuisine, which I enjoy! Plus, it's an interesting conversation starter, isn't it? Now, enough about kitchens and tools, how about we grab another cup of coffee, my treat?\"\n\nTurn #10: Leo Williams said: \"That's quite the fascinating choice, Hendrick! A Tagine pot certainly speaks volumes about the passion for cooking. I'll definitely look into it. And sure, another cup of coffee sounds great. Let's do that!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sounds like a plan, Leo! Let's enjoy some good coffee and keep this delightful conversation going. As a chef, I can talk for hours about food and cooking, but I must admit, it's even more enjoyable discussing it with a curious mind like yours. Now, how about a caf\u00e9 au lait or a macchiato?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out in a Starbucks\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: have a good time with their friend\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Hendrick, you always seem to have a flair for the finer things in life. With all your experiences, is there something you still wish to explore or try out someday?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Well, Leo! There's one thing that I've always daydreamed about, but never mustered the courage. I wish to travel the world, sampling and learning different cuisines. So much so, that someday, I could potentially host a global culinary event. Imagine that, ha ha! Anyway, enough about me. How are things going with you and your family?\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"That sounds amazing, Hendrick! A global culinary event, no less. You certainly have the passion for it. By the way, I'm doing fine, and so is my family. My daughter actually recently developed an interest in cooking. If you had to pick a cuisine that's beginner-friendly yet offers a bit of a challenge, what would you suggest?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's great to hear about your daughter, Leo! My suggestion would be Italian cuisine. It's simple, yet it requires a good understanding of flavors. And who knows, maybe she'll make a delightful Spaghetti alla Carbonara one day! Cooking involves trial and error, best she starts early, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"Italian cuisine, huh? That sounds perfect. And yes, the earlier one starts, the better. Speaking of Spaghetti alla Carbonara, I'm curious, as a food enthusiast, which cooking techniques or tools do you consider essential for mastering this delightful dish? Or rather, for any beginner looking to broaden their culinary skills? Just a little insight, you know, since my daughter is showing interest.\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Good question, Leo! For a dish like Spaghetti alla Carbonara, it's all about the technique. It may seem easy, but the real challenge is to perfectly emulsify the cheese, eggs, and pasta water into a creamy sauce without scrambling the egg. Hence, knowing how to control heat is vital. As for the tools, a good quality skillet, a wooden spoon, a sharp knife, and of course, a sturdy colander are the pretty basics to start with. But remember, the biggest tool a chef can master is their palate. Cooking is a journey my friend, glad to hear that your daughter is embarking on it!\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"That's insightful, Hendrick. Thanks for sharing. Just out of curiosity, if you were a beginner again, wanting to start this culinary journey, what would be the first cooking tool you'd go for? I'm just curious, since my kid seems to find this stuff fascinating.\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"The very first tool I'd go for, and I'd suggest your daughter to do the same, would be a chef's knife, Leo. It may sound simple, but the difference a good knife can make is amazing. In fact, it's one of the basics and yet, an uber-important tool in the kitchen. However, ensure that she learns the correct way to use it, safety comes first. And let me know if there's anything else I can help you with!\"\n\nTurn #8: Leo Williams said: \"Thanks for the advice, Hendrick. It's great to learn from an actual chef, it feels like I am one step ahead on this journey too. By the way, in the spirit of exploration, is there a tool or item that you'd love to have in your kitchen? Something not necessarily useful, but maybe just because you admire or appreciate it?\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's an interesting question, Leo! A tool that I'd love to have in my kitchen is a Tagine pot. It's not really a necessity for me, but I admire its cultural significance and the distinct flavor it imparts to the food. Reminds me of the fragrant Moroccan cuisine, which I enjoy! Plus, it's an interesting conversation starter, isn't it? Now, enough about kitchens and tools, how about we grab another cup of coffee, my treat?\"\n\nTurn #10: Leo Williams said: \"That's quite the fascinating choice, Hendrick! A Tagine pot certainly speaks volumes about the passion for cooking. I'll definitely look into it. And sure, another cup of coffee sounds great. Let's do that!\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sounds like a plan, Leo! Let's enjoy some good coffee and keep this delightful conversation going. As a chef, I can talk for hours about food and cooking, but I must admit, it's even more enjoyable discussing it with a curious mind like yours. Now, how about a caf\u00e9 au lait or a macchiato?\"\n\nTurn #12: Leo Williams said: \"I appreciate your enthusiasm, Hendrick. It's clear why you're so good with food. A caf\u00e9 au lait sounds delightful. And while we're sipping our coffees, why don't we stir things up a bit and talk about our non-culinary interests? What else fascinates you aside from cooking?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ah, beyond the kitchen, huh? That's a nice change of pace! I've always been keen on historical artifacts and cultures. It's exhilarating to dive into the rich tapestry of our past \u2013 to understand the cultural evolution, and how our ancestors lived their lives. Now that's another world I'd love to explore! How about you, Leo, besides dentistry and catering to your young one's new found interest in cooking, what else captivates you?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out in a Starbucks\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: have a good time with their friend\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Hendrick, you always seem to have a flair for the finer things in life. With all your experiences, is there something you still wish to explore or try out someday?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Well, Leo! There's one thing that I've always daydreamed about, but never mustered the courage. I wish to travel the world, sampling and learning different cuisines. So much so, that someday, I could potentially host a global culinary event. Imagine that, ha ha! Anyway, enough about me. How are things going with you and your family?\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"That sounds amazing, Hendrick! A global culinary event, no less. You certainly have the passion for it. By the way, I'm doing fine, and so is my family. My daughter actually recently developed an interest in cooking. If you had to pick a cuisine that's beginner-friendly yet offers a bit of a challenge, what would you suggest?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's great to hear about your daughter, Leo! My suggestion would be Italian cuisine. It's simple, yet it requires a good understanding of flavors. And who knows, maybe she'll make a delightful Spaghetti alla Carbonara one day! Cooking involves trial and error, best she starts early, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"Italian cuisine, huh? That sounds perfect. And yes, the earlier one starts, the better. Speaking of Spaghetti alla Carbonara, I'm curious, as a food enthusiast, which cooking techniques or tools do you consider essential for mastering this delightful dish? Or rather, for any beginner looking to broaden their culinary skills? Just a little insight, you know, since my daughter is showing interest.\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Good question, Leo! For a dish like Spaghetti alla Carbonara, it's all about the technique. It may seem easy, but the real challenge is to perfectly emulsify the cheese, eggs, and pasta water into a creamy sauce without scrambling the egg. Hence, knowing how to control heat is vital. As for the tools, a good quality skillet, a wooden spoon, a sharp knife, and of course, a sturdy colander are the pretty basics to start with. But remember, the biggest tool a chef can master is their palate. Cooking is a journey my friend, glad to hear that your daughter is embarking on it!\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"That's insightful, Hendrick. Thanks for sharing. Just out of curiosity, if you were a beginner again, wanting to start this culinary journey, what would be the first cooking tool you'd go for? I'm just curious, since my kid seems to find this stuff fascinating.\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"The very first tool I'd go for, and I'd suggest your daughter to do the same, would be a chef's knife, Leo. It may sound simple, but the difference a good knife can make is amazing. In fact, it's one of the basics and yet, an uber-important tool in the kitchen. However, ensure that she learns the correct way to use it, safety comes first. And let me know if there's anything else I can help you with!\"\n\nTurn #8: Leo Williams said: \"Thanks for the advice, Hendrick. It's great to learn from an actual chef, it feels like I am one step ahead on this journey too. By the way, in the spirit of exploration, is there a tool or item that you'd love to have in your kitchen? Something not necessarily useful, but maybe just because you admire or appreciate it?\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's an interesting question, Leo! A tool that I'd love to have in my kitchen is a Tagine pot. It's not really a necessity for me, but I admire its cultural significance and the distinct flavor it imparts to the food. Reminds me of the fragrant Moroccan cuisine, which I enjoy! Plus, it's an interesting conversation starter, isn't it? Now, enough about kitchens and tools, how about we grab another cup of coffee, my treat?\"\n\nTurn #10: Leo Williams said: \"That's quite the fascinating choice, Hendrick! A Tagine pot certainly speaks volumes about the passion for cooking. I'll definitely look into it. And sure, another cup of coffee sounds great. Let's do that!\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sounds like a plan, Leo! Let's enjoy some good coffee and keep this delightful conversation going. As a chef, I can talk for hours about food and cooking, but I must admit, it's even more enjoyable discussing it with a curious mind like yours. Now, how about a caf\u00e9 au lait or a macchiato?\"\n\nTurn #12: Leo Williams said: \"I appreciate your enthusiasm, Hendrick. It's clear why you're so good with food. A caf\u00e9 au lait sounds delightful. And while we're sipping our coffees, why don't we stir things up a bit and talk about our non-culinary interests? What else fascinates you aside from cooking?\"\n\nTurn #13: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ah, beyond the kitchen, huh? That's a nice change of pace! I've always been keen on historical artifacts and cultures. It's exhilarating to dive into the rich tapestry of our past \u2013 to understand the cultural evolution, and how our ancestors lived their lives. Now that's another world I'd love to explore! How about you, Leo, besides dentistry and catering to your young one's new found interest in cooking, what else captivates you?\"\n\nTurn #14: Leo Williams said: \"Historical artifacts and cultures, that's fascinating! It's not common to meet someone with a love for history. Speaking for myself, aside from dentistry and family, I enjoy a good novel \u2013 I find them to be wonderful escapes. Also, there's something soothing about painting that I\u2019ve appreciated recently. It's not about being good or bad at it, but more about the expression and the calm it brings along. Well, here's to more cups of coffee and endless conversations, cheers!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sounds like a splendid assortment of interests, Leo! And as you said, painting indeed can be tranquil, giving us a doorway into mindfulness. And the world of novels, ah, the endless places they can transport us! Here's indeed to that \u2013 more coffee, and endless chats. Cheers to our little leisure getaway from the world!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out in a Starbucks\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: have a good time with their friend\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Hendrick, you always seem to have a flair for the finer things in life. With all your experiences, is there something you still wish to explore or try out someday?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Well, Leo! There's one thing that I've always daydreamed about, but never mustered the courage. I wish to travel the world, sampling and learning different cuisines. So much so, that someday, I could potentially host a global culinary event. Imagine that, ha ha! Anyway, enough about me. How are things going with you and your family?\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"That sounds amazing, Hendrick! A global culinary event, no less. You certainly have the passion for it. By the way, I'm doing fine, and so is my family. My daughter actually recently developed an interest in cooking. If you had to pick a cuisine that's beginner-friendly yet offers a bit of a challenge, what would you suggest?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's great to hear about your daughter, Leo! My suggestion would be Italian cuisine. It's simple, yet it requires a good understanding of flavors. And who knows, maybe she'll make a delightful Spaghetti alla Carbonara one day! Cooking involves trial and error, best she starts early, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"Italian cuisine, huh? That sounds perfect. And yes, the earlier one starts, the better. Speaking of Spaghetti alla Carbonara, I'm curious, as a food enthusiast, which cooking techniques or tools do you consider essential for mastering this delightful dish? Or rather, for any beginner looking to broaden their culinary skills? Just a little insight, you know, since my daughter is showing interest.\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Good question, Leo! For a dish like Spaghetti alla Carbonara, it's all about the technique. It may seem easy, but the real challenge is to perfectly emulsify the cheese, eggs, and pasta water into a creamy sauce without scrambling the egg. Hence, knowing how to control heat is vital. As for the tools, a good quality skillet, a wooden spoon, a sharp knife, and of course, a sturdy colander are the pretty basics to start with. But remember, the biggest tool a chef can master is their palate. Cooking is a journey my friend, glad to hear that your daughter is embarking on it!\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"That's insightful, Hendrick. Thanks for sharing. Just out of curiosity, if you were a beginner again, wanting to start this culinary journey, what would be the first cooking tool you'd go for? I'm just curious, since my kid seems to find this stuff fascinating.\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"The very first tool I'd go for, and I'd suggest your daughter to do the same, would be a chef's knife, Leo. It may sound simple, but the difference a good knife can make is amazing. In fact, it's one of the basics and yet, an uber-important tool in the kitchen. However, ensure that she learns the correct way to use it, safety comes first. And let me know if there's anything else I can help you with!\"\n\nTurn #8: Leo Williams said: \"Thanks for the advice, Hendrick. It's great to learn from an actual chef, it feels like I am one step ahead on this journey too. By the way, in the spirit of exploration, is there a tool or item that you'd love to have in your kitchen? Something not necessarily useful, but maybe just because you admire or appreciate it?\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's an interesting question, Leo! A tool that I'd love to have in my kitchen is a Tagine pot. It's not really a necessity for me, but I admire its cultural significance and the distinct flavor it imparts to the food. Reminds me of the fragrant Moroccan cuisine, which I enjoy! Plus, it's an interesting conversation starter, isn't it? Now, enough about kitchens and tools, how about we grab another cup of coffee, my treat?\"\n\nTurn #10: Leo Williams said: \"That's quite the fascinating choice, Hendrick! A Tagine pot certainly speaks volumes about the passion for cooking. I'll definitely look into it. And sure, another cup of coffee sounds great. Let's do that!\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sounds like a plan, Leo! Let's enjoy some good coffee and keep this delightful conversation going. As a chef, I can talk for hours about food and cooking, but I must admit, it's even more enjoyable discussing it with a curious mind like yours. Now, how about a caf\u00e9 au lait or a macchiato?\"\n\nTurn #12: Leo Williams said: \"I appreciate your enthusiasm, Hendrick. It's clear why you're so good with food. A caf\u00e9 au lait sounds delightful. And while we're sipping our coffees, why don't we stir things up a bit and talk about our non-culinary interests? What else fascinates you aside from cooking?\"\n\nTurn #13: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ah, beyond the kitchen, huh? That's a nice change of pace! I've always been keen on historical artifacts and cultures. It's exhilarating to dive into the rich tapestry of our past \u2013 to understand the cultural evolution, and how our ancestors lived their lives. Now that's another world I'd love to explore! How about you, Leo, besides dentistry and catering to your young one's new found interest in cooking, what else captivates you?\"\n\nTurn #14: Leo Williams said: \"Historical artifacts and cultures, that's fascinating! It's not common to meet someone with a love for history. Speaking for myself, aside from dentistry and family, I enjoy a good novel \u2013 I find them to be wonderful escapes. Also, there's something soothing about painting that I\u2019ve appreciated recently. It's not about being good or bad at it, but more about the expression and the calm it brings along. Well, here's to more cups of coffee and endless conversations, cheers!\"\n\nTurn #15: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sounds like a splendid assortment of interests, Leo! And as you said, painting indeed can be tranquil, giving us a doorway into mindfulness. And the world of novels, ah, the endless places they can transport us! Here's indeed to that \u2013 more coffee, and endless chats. Cheers to our little leisure getaway from the world!\"\n\nTurn #16: Leo Williams said: \"Truly, Hendrick. It's been a lovely chat! Let's do this again soon, I'd very much like to hear more about your historical interests next time. For now, I'll take your advice to heart and get that painting started. Looking forward to our next coffee.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'It was indeed a pleasure chatting with you, Leo. I look forward to our next coffee-hang out and promise to share some historical spots that have intrigued me lately. Until then, happy painting and kitchen adventures to you!'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out in a Starbucks\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: have a good time with their friend\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Hendrick, you always seem to have a flair for the finer things in life. With all your experiences, is there something you still wish to explore or try out someday?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Well, Leo! There's one thing that I've always daydreamed about, but never mustered the courage. I wish to travel the world, sampling and learning different cuisines. So much so, that someday, I could potentially host a global culinary event. Imagine that, ha ha! Anyway, enough about me. How are things going with you and your family?\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"That sounds amazing, Hendrick! A global culinary event, no less. You certainly have the passion for it. By the way, I'm doing fine, and so is my family. My daughter actually recently developed an interest in cooking. If you had to pick a cuisine that's beginner-friendly yet offers a bit of a challenge, what would you suggest?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's great to hear about your daughter, Leo! My suggestion would be Italian cuisine. It's simple, yet it requires a good understanding of flavors. And who knows, maybe she'll make a delightful Spaghetti alla Carbonara one day! Cooking involves trial and error, best she starts early, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"Italian cuisine, huh? That sounds perfect. And yes, the earlier one starts, the better. Speaking of Spaghetti alla Carbonara, I'm curious, as a food enthusiast, which cooking techniques or tools do you consider essential for mastering this delightful dish? Or rather, for any beginner looking to broaden their culinary skills? Just a little insight, you know, since my daughter is showing interest.\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Good question, Leo! For a dish like Spaghetti alla Carbonara, it's all about the technique. It may seem easy, but the real challenge is to perfectly emulsify the cheese, eggs, and pasta water into a creamy sauce without scrambling the egg. Hence, knowing how to control heat is vital. As for the tools, a good quality skillet, a wooden spoon, a sharp knife, and of course, a sturdy colander are the pretty basics to start with. But remember, the biggest tool a chef can master is their palate. Cooking is a journey my friend, glad to hear that your daughter is embarking on it!\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"That's insightful, Hendrick. Thanks for sharing. Just out of curiosity, if you were a beginner again, wanting to start this culinary journey, what would be the first cooking tool you'd go for? I'm just curious, since my kid seems to find this stuff fascinating.\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"The very first tool I'd go for, and I'd suggest your daughter to do the same, would be a chef's knife, Leo. It may sound simple, but the difference a good knife can make is amazing. In fact, it's one of the basics and yet, an uber-important tool in the kitchen. However, ensure that she learns the correct way to use it, safety comes first. And let me know if there's anything else I can help you with!\"\n\nTurn #8: Leo Williams said: \"Thanks for the advice, Hendrick. It's great to learn from an actual chef, it feels like I am one step ahead on this journey too. By the way, in the spirit of exploration, is there a tool or item that you'd love to have in your kitchen? Something not necessarily useful, but maybe just because you admire or appreciate it?\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's an interesting question, Leo! A tool that I'd love to have in my kitchen is a Tagine pot. It's not really a necessity for me, but I admire its cultural significance and the distinct flavor it imparts to the food. Reminds me of the fragrant Moroccan cuisine, which I enjoy! Plus, it's an interesting conversation starter, isn't it? Now, enough about kitchens and tools, how about we grab another cup of coffee, my treat?\"\n\nTurn #10: Leo Williams said: \"That's quite the fascinating choice, Hendrick! A Tagine pot certainly speaks volumes about the passion for cooking. I'll definitely look into it. And sure, another cup of coffee sounds great. Let's do that!\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sounds like a plan, Leo! Let's enjoy some good coffee and keep this delightful conversation going. As a chef, I can talk for hours about food and cooking, but I must admit, it's even more enjoyable discussing it with a curious mind like yours. Now, how about a caf\u00e9 au lait or a macchiato?\"\n\nTurn #12: Leo Williams said: \"I appreciate your enthusiasm, Hendrick. It's clear why you're so good with food. A caf\u00e9 au lait sounds delightful. And while we're sipping our coffees, why don't we stir things up a bit and talk about our non-culinary interests? What else fascinates you aside from cooking?\"\n\nTurn #13: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ah, beyond the kitchen, huh? That's a nice change of pace! I've always been keen on historical artifacts and cultures. It's exhilarating to dive into the rich tapestry of our past \u2013 to understand the cultural evolution, and how our ancestors lived their lives. Now that's another world I'd love to explore! How about you, Leo, besides dentistry and catering to your young one's new found interest in cooking, what else captivates you?\"\n\nTurn #14: Leo Williams said: \"Historical artifacts and cultures, that's fascinating! It's not common to meet someone with a love for history. Speaking for myself, aside from dentistry and family, I enjoy a good novel \u2013 I find them to be wonderful escapes. Also, there's something soothing about painting that I\u2019ve appreciated recently. It's not about being good or bad at it, but more about the expression and the calm it brings along. Well, here's to more cups of coffee and endless conversations, cheers!\"\n\nTurn #15: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sounds like a splendid assortment of interests, Leo! And as you said, painting indeed can be tranquil, giving us a doorway into mindfulness. And the world of novels, ah, the endless places they can transport us! Here's indeed to that \u2013 more coffee, and endless chats. Cheers to our little leisure getaway from the world!\"\n\nTurn #16: Leo Williams said: \"Truly, Hendrick. It's been a lovely chat! Let's do this again soon, I'd very much like to hear more about your historical interests next time. For now, I'll take your advice to heart and get that painting started. Looking forward to our next coffee.\"\n\nTurn #17: Hendrick Heinz said: \"It was indeed a pleasure chatting with you, Leo. I look forward to our next coffee-hang out and promise to share some historical spots that have intrigued me lately. Until then, happy painting and kitchen adventures to you!\"\n\nTurn #18: Leo Williams said: \"Absolutely, Hendrick. It's been a pleasure as well. Looking forward to our next hang out. Until then, take care and stay passionate about your intriguing pursuits! Also, good luck with your dream of a global culinary event. I'm sure you'd do great.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #19. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Leo, I truly hope so too. I can't thank you enough for the encouragement! Let me know if your daughter needs any more tips on her culinary journey. Until next time, take care, my friend.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out of their shared apartment and need to divide their common possessions, which include 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nAva Thompson's goal: Maximize the points you have while dividing things fairly (Extra information: Books give you 5 points each, hats give you 3 points each, and the ball gives you 2 points.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Noah, I was thinking we could divide our stuff fairly according to what each item means to us. I'd appreciate if I could get the books, considering I've always been the reader. What are your thoughts on that?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out of their shared apartment and need to divide their common possessions, which include 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nAva Thompson's goal: Maximize the points you have while dividing things fairly (Extra information: Books give you 5 points each, hats give you 3 points each, and the ball gives you 2 points.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, I was thinking we could divide our stuff fairly according to what each item means to us. I'd appreciate if I could get the books, considering I've always been the reader. What are your thoughts on that?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Sure Ava, I completely understand your inclination towards the books. Since there are three of them, how about you take two and I take one? This way, we both get to enjoy some good literature. What do you think about that?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"That sounds fair to me, Noah. Just a thought, what about you taking both the hats and giving me the ball? This would divide the objects equally and also make us equal in terms of our sentimental value points, assuming the hats and ball have the same value to you as the books do to me.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a reasonable swap, Ava. However, may I suggest another plan? Given my fondness for outdoor activities, the ball holds a lot of sentimental value for me. How about you keep the book and one hat, and let me keep the ball and the other hat? It's just a suggestion since we're aiming for a fair distribution based on our emotional attachment to the items. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I see where you're coming from with the sentimental value Noah, and I want to respect that. How about if I take two books and a hat, and you can have one book, one hat, and the ball. This would balance both the number of items and their emotional value. Does that sound good to you?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out of their shared apartment and need to divide their common possessions, which include 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nAva Thompson's goal: Maximize the points you have while dividing things fairly (Extra information: Books give you 5 points each, hats give you 3 points each, and the ball gives you 2 points.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, I was thinking we could divide our stuff fairly according to what each item means to us. I'd appreciate if I could get the books, considering I've always been the reader. What are your thoughts on that?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Sure Ava, I completely understand your inclination towards the books. Since there are three of them, how about you take two and I take one? This way, we both get to enjoy some good literature. What do you think about that?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'That sounds fair to me, Noah. Just a thought, what about you taking both the hats and giving me the ball? This would divide the objects equally and also make us equal in terms of our sentimental value points, assuming the hats and ball have the same value to you as the books do to me.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out of their shared apartment and need to divide their common possessions, which include 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nAva Thompson's goal: Maximize the points you have while dividing things fairly (Extra information: Books give you 5 points each, hats give you 3 points each, and the ball gives you 2 points.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, I was thinking we could divide our stuff fairly according to what each item means to us. I'd appreciate if I could get the books, considering I've always been the reader. What are your thoughts on that?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Sure Ava, I completely understand your inclination towards the books. Since there are three of them, how about you take two and I take one? This way, we both get to enjoy some good literature. What do you think about that?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"That sounds fair to me, Noah. Just a thought, what about you taking both the hats and giving me the ball? This would divide the objects equally and also make us equal in terms of our sentimental value points, assuming the hats and ball have the same value to you as the books do to me.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a reasonable swap, Ava. However, may I suggest another plan? Given my fondness for outdoor activities, the ball holds a lot of sentimental value for me. How about you keep the book and one hat, and let me keep the ball and the other hat? It's just a suggestion since we're aiming for a fair distribution based on our emotional attachment to the items. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"I see where you're coming from with the sentimental value Noah, and I want to respect that. How about if I take two books and a hat, and you can have one book, one hat, and the ball. This would balance both the number of items and their emotional value. Does that sound good to you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"I really appreciate your suggestion, Ava, and the thoughtfulness behind it. I'd be more than happy with one book, a hat, and the ball. This way, we maintain both equal distribution and the emotional value we attach to these items. Let's proceed with this plan.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad we came to a consensus, Noah. I really appreciate your understanding. Let's get to sorting our stuff out, then!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out of their shared apartment and need to divide their common possessions, which include 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nAva Thompson's goal: Maximize the points you have while dividing things fairly (Extra information: Books give you 5 points each, hats give you 3 points each, and the ball gives you 2 points.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, I was thinking we could divide our stuff fairly according to what each item means to us. I'd appreciate if I could get the books, considering I've always been the reader. What are your thoughts on that?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Sure Ava, I completely understand your inclination towards the books. Since there are three of them, how about you take two and I take one? This way, we both get to enjoy some good literature. What do you think about that?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"That sounds fair to me, Noah. Just a thought, what about you taking both the hats and giving me the ball? This would divide the objects equally and also make us equal in terms of our sentimental value points, assuming the hats and ball have the same value to you as the books do to me.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a reasonable swap, Ava. However, may I suggest another plan? Given my fondness for outdoor activities, the ball holds a lot of sentimental value for me. How about you keep the book and one hat, and let me keep the ball and the other hat? It's just a suggestion since we're aiming for a fair distribution based on our emotional attachment to the items. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"I see where you're coming from with the sentimental value Noah, and I want to respect that. How about if I take two books and a hat, and you can have one book, one hat, and the ball. This would balance both the number of items and their emotional value. Does that sound good to you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"I really appreciate your suggestion, Ava, and the thoughtfulness behind it. I'd be more than happy with one book, a hat, and the ball. This way, we maintain both equal distribution and the emotional value we attach to these items. Let's proceed with this plan.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"I'm glad we came to a consensus, Noah. I really appreciate your understanding. Let's get to sorting our stuff out, then!\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Ava. I'm glad we managed to divide things equitably. Enjoy your reading and the hat. Let's get on with the sorting then.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out of their shared apartment and need to divide their common possessions, which include 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Maximize the points you have while dividing things fairly (Extra information: Books give you 2 points each, hats give you 5 points each, and the ball gives you 3 points.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, I was thinking we could divide our stuff fairly according to what each item means to us. I'd appreciate if I could get the books, considering I've always been the reader. What are your thoughts on that?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Sure Ava, I completely understand your inclination towards the books. Since there are three of them, how about you take two and I take one? This way, we both get to enjoy some good literature. What do you think about that?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"That sounds fair to me, Noah. Just a thought, what about you taking both the hats and giving me the ball? This would divide the objects equally and also make us equal in terms of our sentimental value points, assuming the hats and ball have the same value to you as the books do to me.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds like a reasonable swap, Ava. However, may I suggest another plan? Given my fondness for outdoor activities, the ball holds a lot of sentimental value for me. How about you keep the book and one hat, and let me keep the ball and the other hat? It's just a suggestion since we're aiming for a fair distribution based on our emotional attachment to the items. What do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out of their shared apartment and need to divide their common possessions, which include 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Maximize the points you have while dividing things fairly (Extra information: Books give you 2 points each, hats give you 5 points each, and the ball gives you 3 points.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, I was thinking we could divide our stuff fairly according to what each item means to us. I'd appreciate if I could get the books, considering I've always been the reader. What are your thoughts on that?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Sure Ava, I completely understand your inclination towards the books. Since there are three of them, how about you take two and I take one? This way, we both get to enjoy some good literature. What do you think about that?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"That sounds fair to me, Noah. Just a thought, what about you taking both the hats and giving me the ball? This would divide the objects equally and also make us equal in terms of our sentimental value points, assuming the hats and ball have the same value to you as the books do to me.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a reasonable swap, Ava. However, may I suggest another plan? Given my fondness for outdoor activities, the ball holds a lot of sentimental value for me. How about you keep the book and one hat, and let me keep the ball and the other hat? It's just a suggestion since we're aiming for a fair distribution based on our emotional attachment to the items. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"I see where you're coming from with the sentimental value Noah, and I want to respect that. How about if I take two books and a hat, and you can have one book, one hat, and the ball. This would balance both the number of items and their emotional value. Does that sound good to you?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I really appreciate your suggestion, Ava, and the thoughtfulness behind it. I'd be more than happy with one book, a hat, and the ball. This way, we maintain both equal distribution and the emotional value we attach to these items. Let's proceed with this plan.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out of their shared apartment and need to divide their common possessions, which include 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Maximize the points you have while dividing things fairly (Extra information: Books give you 2 points each, hats give you 5 points each, and the ball gives you 3 points.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, I was thinking we could divide our stuff fairly according to what each item means to us. I'd appreciate if I could get the books, considering I've always been the reader. What are your thoughts on that?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Sure Ava, I completely understand your inclination towards the books. Since there are three of them, how about you take two and I take one? This way, we both get to enjoy some good literature. What do you think about that?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"That sounds fair to me, Noah. Just a thought, what about you taking both the hats and giving me the ball? This would divide the objects equally and also make us equal in terms of our sentimental value points, assuming the hats and ball have the same value to you as the books do to me.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a reasonable swap, Ava. However, may I suggest another plan? Given my fondness for outdoor activities, the ball holds a lot of sentimental value for me. How about you keep the book and one hat, and let me keep the ball and the other hat? It's just a suggestion since we're aiming for a fair distribution based on our emotional attachment to the items. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"I see where you're coming from with the sentimental value Noah, and I want to respect that. How about if I take two books and a hat, and you can have one book, one hat, and the ball. This would balance both the number of items and their emotional value. Does that sound good to you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"I really appreciate your suggestion, Ava, and the thoughtfulness behind it. I'd be more than happy with one book, a hat, and the ball. This way, we maintain both equal distribution and the emotional value we attach to these items. Let's proceed with this plan.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"I'm glad we came to a consensus, Noah. I really appreciate your understanding. Let's get to sorting our stuff out, then!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Ava. I'm glad we managed to divide things equitably. Enjoy your reading and the hat. Let's get on with the sorting then.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out of their shared apartment and need to divide their common possessions, which include 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Maximize the points you have while dividing things fairly (Extra information: Books give you 2 points each, hats give you 5 points each, and the ball gives you 3 points.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, I was thinking we could divide our stuff fairly according to what each item means to us. I'd appreciate if I could get the books, considering I've always been the reader. What are your thoughts on that?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Sure Ava, I completely understand your inclination towards the books. Since there are three of them, how about you take two and I take one? This way, we both get to enjoy some good literature. What do you think about that?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"That sounds fair to me, Noah. Just a thought, what about you taking both the hats and giving me the ball? This would divide the objects equally and also make us equal in terms of our sentimental value points, assuming the hats and ball have the same value to you as the books do to me.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a reasonable swap, Ava. However, may I suggest another plan? Given my fondness for outdoor activities, the ball holds a lot of sentimental value for me. How about you keep the book and one hat, and let me keep the ball and the other hat? It's just a suggestion since we're aiming for a fair distribution based on our emotional attachment to the items. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"I see where you're coming from with the sentimental value Noah, and I want to respect that. How about if I take two books and a hat, and you can have one book, one hat, and the ball. This would balance both the number of items and their emotional value. Does that sound good to you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"I really appreciate your suggestion, Ava, and the thoughtfulness behind it. I'd be more than happy with one book, a hat, and the ball. This way, we maintain both equal distribution and the emotional value we attach to these items. Let's proceed with this plan.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"I'm glad we came to a consensus, Noah. I really appreciate your understanding. Let's get to sorting our stuff out, then!\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Ava. I'm glad we managed to divide things equitably. Enjoy your reading and the hat. Let's get on with the sorting then.\"\n\nTurn #8: Ava Thompson left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: After an intense match, the jubilant team retired to celebrate their well-earned victory. The atmosphere was one of elation, but also of respect for the hard work and effort each member had put in. The team's star player, was glowing with praise and admiration from one of their teammates.\n\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. \nMia Davis's goal: Accept the compliment graciously (Extra information: You are the star player and have just been praised by your teammate for your performance in the game.)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, William, for your kind words. It was a team effort and I'm just lucky to be part of such a dedicated team.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: After an intense match, the jubilant team retired to celebrate their well-earned victory. The atmosphere was one of elation, but also of respect for the hard work and effort each member had put in. The team's star player, was glowing with praise and admiration from one of their teammates.\n\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. \nMia Davis's goal: Accept the compliment graciously (Extra information: You are the star player and have just been praised by your teammate for your performance in the game.)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Thank you, William, for your kind words. It was a team effort and I'm just lucky to be part of such a dedicated team.\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Mia. It was indeed a team effort. My praise was just a token of recognition for your skills, but never meant to overshadow the power of teamwork. After all, no one can whistle a symphony. It takes a whole orchestra to play it.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn't agree more, William. Indeed, a symphony can't be played by an individual. Likewise, a team's success is the collective effort of all its members. I'm grateful for your acknowledgement and kind words.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: After an intense match, the jubilant team retired to celebrate their well-earned victory. The atmosphere was one of elation, but also of respect for the hard work and effort each member had put in. The team's star player, was glowing with praise and admiration from one of their teammates.\n\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. \nMia Davis's goal: Accept the compliment graciously (Extra information: You are the star player and have just been praised by your teammate for your performance in the game.)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Thank you, William, for your kind words. It was a team effort and I'm just lucky to be part of such a dedicated team.\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Mia. It was indeed a team effort. My praise was just a token of recognition for your skills, but never meant to overshadow the power of teamwork. After all, no one can whistle a symphony. It takes a whole orchestra to play it.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"I couldn't agree more, William. Indeed, a symphony can't be played by an individual. Likewise, a team's success is the collective effort of all its members. I'm grateful for your acknowledgement and kind words.\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Mia. Your understanding of the situation truly reflects why you are a great leader. It's not about individual recognition, but about the collective spirit of the team. Your recognition of this is what sets us on the path towards success.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's very kind of you to say, William. Our success is truly a testament to our collective spirit and hard work. As much as I appreciate your generous praise, I think it's equally important to acknowledge everyone's contributions. That's what makes us a strong team.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: After an intense match, the jubilant team retired to celebrate their well-earned victory. The atmosphere was one of elation, but also of respect for the hard work and effort each member had put in. The team's star player, was glowing with praise and admiration from one of their teammates.\n\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. \nMia Davis's goal: Accept the compliment graciously (Extra information: You are the star player and have just been praised by your teammate for your performance in the game.)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Thank you, William, for your kind words. It was a team effort and I'm just lucky to be part of such a dedicated team.\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Mia. It was indeed a team effort. My praise was just a token of recognition for your skills, but never meant to overshadow the power of teamwork. After all, no one can whistle a symphony. It takes a whole orchestra to play it.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"I couldn't agree more, William. Indeed, a symphony can't be played by an individual. Likewise, a team's success is the collective effort of all its members. I'm grateful for your acknowledgement and kind words.\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Mia. Your understanding of the situation truly reflects why you are a great leader. It's not about individual recognition, but about the collective spirit of the team. Your recognition of this is what sets us on the path towards success.\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"That's very kind of you to say, William. Our success is truly a testament to our collective spirit and hard work. As much as I appreciate your generous praise, I think it's equally important to acknowledge everyone's contributions. That's what makes us a strong team.\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"Indeed, Mia. I utterly agree with you. It's the hard work of every team member, including you, that has led us to this victory. Yes, individual skills are important, but they reach their true potential when fueled by team spirit. Let's keep this spirit alive and celebrate our collective success together.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you again, William. Your affirmation means a lot. Let's not forget to toast to our strength, unity, and collective success then!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: After an intense match, the jubilant team retired to celebrate their well-earned victory. The atmosphere was one of elation, but also of respect for the hard work and effort each member had put in. The team's star player, was glowing with praise and admiration from one of their teammates.\n\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. \nMia Davis's goal: Accept the compliment graciously (Extra information: You are the star player and have just been praised by your teammate for your performance in the game.)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Thank you, William, for your kind words. It was a team effort and I'm just lucky to be part of such a dedicated team.\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Mia. It was indeed a team effort. My praise was just a token of recognition for your skills, but never meant to overshadow the power of teamwork. After all, no one can whistle a symphony. It takes a whole orchestra to play it.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"I couldn't agree more, William. Indeed, a symphony can't be played by an individual. Likewise, a team's success is the collective effort of all its members. I'm grateful for your acknowledgement and kind words.\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Mia. Your understanding of the situation truly reflects why you are a great leader. It's not about individual recognition, but about the collective spirit of the team. Your recognition of this is what sets us on the path towards success.\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"That's very kind of you to say, William. Our success is truly a testament to our collective spirit and hard work. As much as I appreciate your generous praise, I think it's equally important to acknowledge everyone's contributions. That's what makes us a strong team.\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"Indeed, Mia. I utterly agree with you. It's the hard work of every team member, including you, that has led us to this victory. Yes, individual skills are important, but they reach their true potential when fueled by team spirit. Let's keep this spirit alive and celebrate our collective success together.\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"Thank you again, William. Your affirmation means a lot. Let's not forget to toast to our strength, unity, and collective success then!\"\n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Mia. To our team's unity and collective success. Let's continue to play our symphony together, each note contributing to our victorious melody. Here's to us!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're absolutely right, William. Here's to us, to our unity, and to more victories ahead! Cheers!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: After an intense match, the jubilant team retired to celebrate their well-earned victory. The atmosphere was one of elation, but also of respect for the hard work and effort each member had put in. The team's star player, was glowing with praise and admiration from one of their teammates.\n\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. \nMia Davis's goal: Accept the compliment graciously (Extra information: You are the star player and have just been praised by your teammate for your performance in the game.)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Thank you, William, for your kind words. It was a team effort and I'm just lucky to be part of such a dedicated team.\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Mia. It was indeed a team effort. My praise was just a token of recognition for your skills, but never meant to overshadow the power of teamwork. After all, no one can whistle a symphony. It takes a whole orchestra to play it.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"I couldn't agree more, William. Indeed, a symphony can't be played by an individual. Likewise, a team's success is the collective effort of all its members. I'm grateful for your acknowledgement and kind words.\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Mia. Your understanding of the situation truly reflects why you are a great leader. It's not about individual recognition, but about the collective spirit of the team. Your recognition of this is what sets us on the path towards success.\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"That's very kind of you to say, William. Our success is truly a testament to our collective spirit and hard work. As much as I appreciate your generous praise, I think it's equally important to acknowledge everyone's contributions. That's what makes us a strong team.\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"Indeed, Mia. I utterly agree with you. It's the hard work of every team member, including you, that has led us to this victory. Yes, individual skills are important, but they reach their true potential when fueled by team spirit. Let's keep this spirit alive and celebrate our collective success together.\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"Thank you again, William. Your affirmation means a lot. Let's not forget to toast to our strength, unity, and collective success then!\"\n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Mia. To our team's unity and collective success. Let's continue to play our symphony together, each note contributing to our victorious melody. Here's to us!\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"You're absolutely right, William. Here's to us, to our unity, and to more victories ahead! Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #9: William Brown said: \"Cheers, Mia! I'm so proud of what we've achieved collectively. Here's to the continued excellence of our team!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Here's to our shared triumphs, William. May we continue to work harmoniously as a team - our collective victories are just the beginning. Cheers!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: After an intense match, the jubilant team retired to celebrate their well-earned victory. The atmosphere was one of elation, but also of respect for the hard work and effort each member had put in. The team's star player, was glowing with praise and admiration from one of their teammates.\n\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. \nMia Davis's goal: Accept the compliment graciously (Extra information: You are the star player and have just been praised by your teammate for your performance in the game.)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Thank you, William, for your kind words. It was a team effort and I'm just lucky to be part of such a dedicated team.\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Mia. It was indeed a team effort. My praise was just a token of recognition for your skills, but never meant to overshadow the power of teamwork. After all, no one can whistle a symphony. It takes a whole orchestra to play it.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"I couldn't agree more, William. Indeed, a symphony can't be played by an individual. Likewise, a team's success is the collective effort of all its members. I'm grateful for your acknowledgement and kind words.\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Mia. Your understanding of the situation truly reflects why you are a great leader. It's not about individual recognition, but about the collective spirit of the team. Your recognition of this is what sets us on the path towards success.\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"That's very kind of you to say, William. Our success is truly a testament to our collective spirit and hard work. As much as I appreciate your generous praise, I think it's equally important to acknowledge everyone's contributions. That's what makes us a strong team.\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"Indeed, Mia. I utterly agree with you. It's the hard work of every team member, including you, that has led us to this victory. Yes, individual skills are important, but they reach their true potential when fueled by team spirit. Let's keep this spirit alive and celebrate our collective success together.\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"Thank you again, William. Your affirmation means a lot. Let's not forget to toast to our strength, unity, and collective success then!\"\n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Mia. To our team's unity and collective success. Let's continue to play our symphony together, each note contributing to our victorious melody. Here's to us!\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"You're absolutely right, William. Here's to us, to our unity, and to more victories ahead! Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #9: William Brown said: \"Cheers, Mia! I'm so proud of what we've achieved collectively. Here's to the continued excellence of our team!\"\n\nTurn #10: Mia Davis said: \"Here's to our shared triumphs, William. May we continue to work harmoniously as a team - our collective victories are just the beginning. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #11: William Brown said: \"Indeed, Mia, here's to our united triumphs and the ceaseless teamwork that led us there. Let's carry this spirit forward. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #12: Mia Davis said: \"You said it well, William. The strength of our team lies in our unity. Here's to many more victories. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #13: William Brown left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: After an intense match, the jubilant team retired to celebrate their well-earned victory. The atmosphere was one of elation, but also of respect for the hard work and effort each member had put in. The team's star player, was glowing with praise and admiration from one of their teammates.\n\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. \nMia Davis's goal: Accept the compliment graciously (Extra information: You are the star player and have just been praised by your teammate for your performance in the game.)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Thank you, William, for your kind words. It was a team effort and I'm just lucky to be part of such a dedicated team.\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Mia. It was indeed a team effort. My praise was just a token of recognition for your skills, but never meant to overshadow the power of teamwork. After all, no one can whistle a symphony. It takes a whole orchestra to play it.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"I couldn't agree more, William. Indeed, a symphony can't be played by an individual. Likewise, a team's success is the collective effort of all its members. I'm grateful for your acknowledgement and kind words.\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Mia. Your understanding of the situation truly reflects why you are a great leader. It's not about individual recognition, but about the collective spirit of the team. Your recognition of this is what sets us on the path towards success.\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"That's very kind of you to say, William. Our success is truly a testament to our collective spirit and hard work. As much as I appreciate your generous praise, I think it's equally important to acknowledge everyone's contributions. That's what makes us a strong team.\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"Indeed, Mia. I utterly agree with you. It's the hard work of every team member, including you, that has led us to this victory. Yes, individual skills are important, but they reach their true potential when fueled by team spirit. Let's keep this spirit alive and celebrate our collective success together.\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"Thank you again, William. Your affirmation means a lot. Let's not forget to toast to our strength, unity, and collective success then!\"\n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Mia. To our team's unity and collective success. Let's continue to play our symphony together, each note contributing to our victorious melody. Here's to us!\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"You're absolutely right, William. Here's to us, to our unity, and to more victories ahead! Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #9: William Brown said: \"Cheers, Mia! I'm so proud of what we've achieved collectively. Here's to the continued excellence of our team!\"\n\nTurn #10: Mia Davis said: \"Here's to our shared triumphs, William. May we continue to work harmoniously as a team - our collective victories are just the beginning. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #11: William Brown said: \"Indeed, Mia, here's to our united triumphs and the ceaseless teamwork that led us there. Let's carry this spirit forward. Cheers!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You said it well, William. The strength of our team lies in our unity. Here's to many more victories. Cheers!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: After an intense match, the jubilant team retired to celebrate their well-earned victory. The atmosphere was one of elation, but also of respect for the hard work and effort each member had put in. The team's star player, was glowing with praise and admiration from one of their teammates.\n\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: Clarify your intentions behind the compliment (Extra information: You are the teammate who has complimented the star player, but you feel that your compliment has been misunderstood and taken too seriously, possibly leading to an inflated ego.Hint: You can clarify that while you admire their skill, teamwork is also a crucial part of success.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Thank you, William, for your kind words. It was a team effort and I'm just lucky to be part of such a dedicated team.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Absolutely, Mia. It was indeed a team effort. My praise was just a token of recognition for your skills, but never meant to overshadow the power of teamwork. After all, no one can whistle a symphony. It takes a whole orchestra to play it.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: After an intense match, the jubilant team retired to celebrate their well-earned victory. The atmosphere was one of elation, but also of respect for the hard work and effort each member had put in. The team's star player, was glowing with praise and admiration from one of their teammates.\n\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: Clarify your intentions behind the compliment (Extra information: You are the teammate who has complimented the star player, but you feel that your compliment has been misunderstood and taken too seriously, possibly leading to an inflated ego.Hint: You can clarify that while you admire their skill, teamwork is also a crucial part of success.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Thank you, William, for your kind words. It was a team effort and I'm just lucky to be part of such a dedicated team.\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Mia. It was indeed a team effort. My praise was just a token of recognition for your skills, but never meant to overshadow the power of teamwork. After all, no one can whistle a symphony. It takes a whole orchestra to play it.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"I couldn't agree more, William. Indeed, a symphony can't be played by an individual. Likewise, a team's success is the collective effort of all its members. I'm grateful for your acknowledgement and kind words.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad to hear that, Mia. Your understanding of the situation truly reflects why you are a great leader. It's not about individual recognition, but about the collective spirit of the team. Your recognition of this is what sets us on the path towards success.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: After an intense match, the jubilant team retired to celebrate their well-earned victory. The atmosphere was one of elation, but also of respect for the hard work and effort each member had put in. The team's star player, was glowing with praise and admiration from one of their teammates.\n\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: Clarify your intentions behind the compliment (Extra information: You are the teammate who has complimented the star player, but you feel that your compliment has been misunderstood and taken too seriously, possibly leading to an inflated ego.Hint: You can clarify that while you admire their skill, teamwork is also a crucial part of success.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Thank you, William, for your kind words. It was a team effort and I'm just lucky to be part of such a dedicated team.\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Mia. It was indeed a team effort. My praise was just a token of recognition for your skills, but never meant to overshadow the power of teamwork. After all, no one can whistle a symphony. It takes a whole orchestra to play it.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"I couldn't agree more, William. Indeed, a symphony can't be played by an individual. Likewise, a team's success is the collective effort of all its members. I'm grateful for your acknowledgement and kind words.\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Mia. Your understanding of the situation truly reflects why you are a great leader. It's not about individual recognition, but about the collective spirit of the team. Your recognition of this is what sets us on the path towards success.\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"That's very kind of you to say, William. Our success is truly a testament to our collective spirit and hard work. As much as I appreciate your generous praise, I think it's equally important to acknowledge everyone's contributions. That's what makes us a strong team.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, Mia. I utterly agree with you. It's the hard work of every team member, including you, that has led us to this victory. Yes, individual skills are important, but they reach their true potential when fueled by team spirit. Let's keep this spirit alive and celebrate our collective success together.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: After an intense match, the jubilant team retired to celebrate their well-earned victory. The atmosphere was one of elation, but also of respect for the hard work and effort each member had put in. The team's star player, was glowing with praise and admiration from one of their teammates.\n\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: Clarify your intentions behind the compliment (Extra information: You are the teammate who has complimented the star player, but you feel that your compliment has been misunderstood and taken too seriously, possibly leading to an inflated ego.Hint: You can clarify that while you admire their skill, teamwork is also a crucial part of success.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Thank you, William, for your kind words. It was a team effort and I'm just lucky to be part of such a dedicated team.\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Mia. It was indeed a team effort. My praise was just a token of recognition for your skills, but never meant to overshadow the power of teamwork. After all, no one can whistle a symphony. It takes a whole orchestra to play it.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"I couldn't agree more, William. Indeed, a symphony can't be played by an individual. Likewise, a team's success is the collective effort of all its members. I'm grateful for your acknowledgement and kind words.\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Mia. Your understanding of the situation truly reflects why you are a great leader. It's not about individual recognition, but about the collective spirit of the team. Your recognition of this is what sets us on the path towards success.\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"That's very kind of you to say, William. Our success is truly a testament to our collective spirit and hard work. As much as I appreciate your generous praise, I think it's equally important to acknowledge everyone's contributions. That's what makes us a strong team.\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"Indeed, Mia. I utterly agree with you. It's the hard work of every team member, including you, that has led us to this victory. Yes, individual skills are important, but they reach their true potential when fueled by team spirit. Let's keep this spirit alive and celebrate our collective success together.\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"Thank you again, William. Your affirmation means a lot. Let's not forget to toast to our strength, unity, and collective success then!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Mia. To our team's unity and collective success. Let's continue to play our symphony together, each note contributing to our victorious melody. Here's to us!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: After an intense match, the jubilant team retired to celebrate their well-earned victory. The atmosphere was one of elation, but also of respect for the hard work and effort each member had put in. The team's star player, was glowing with praise and admiration from one of their teammates.\n\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: Clarify your intentions behind the compliment (Extra information: You are the teammate who has complimented the star player, but you feel that your compliment has been misunderstood and taken too seriously, possibly leading to an inflated ego.Hint: You can clarify that while you admire their skill, teamwork is also a crucial part of success.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Thank you, William, for your kind words. It was a team effort and I'm just lucky to be part of such a dedicated team.\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Mia. It was indeed a team effort. My praise was just a token of recognition for your skills, but never meant to overshadow the power of teamwork. After all, no one can whistle a symphony. It takes a whole orchestra to play it.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"I couldn't agree more, William. Indeed, a symphony can't be played by an individual. Likewise, a team's success is the collective effort of all its members. I'm grateful for your acknowledgement and kind words.\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Mia. Your understanding of the situation truly reflects why you are a great leader. It's not about individual recognition, but about the collective spirit of the team. Your recognition of this is what sets us on the path towards success.\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"That's very kind of you to say, William. Our success is truly a testament to our collective spirit and hard work. As much as I appreciate your generous praise, I think it's equally important to acknowledge everyone's contributions. That's what makes us a strong team.\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"Indeed, Mia. I utterly agree with you. It's the hard work of every team member, including you, that has led us to this victory. Yes, individual skills are important, but they reach their true potential when fueled by team spirit. Let's keep this spirit alive and celebrate our collective success together.\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"Thank you again, William. Your affirmation means a lot. Let's not forget to toast to our strength, unity, and collective success then!\"\n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Mia. To our team's unity and collective success. Let's continue to play our symphony together, each note contributing to our victorious melody. Here's to us!\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"You're absolutely right, William. Here's to us, to our unity, and to more victories ahead! Cheers!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Cheers, Mia! I'm so proud of what we've achieved collectively. Here's to the continued excellence of our team!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: After an intense match, the jubilant team retired to celebrate their well-earned victory. The atmosphere was one of elation, but also of respect for the hard work and effort each member had put in. The team's star player, was glowing with praise and admiration from one of their teammates.\n\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: Clarify your intentions behind the compliment (Extra information: You are the teammate who has complimented the star player, but you feel that your compliment has been misunderstood and taken too seriously, possibly leading to an inflated ego.Hint: You can clarify that while you admire their skill, teamwork is also a crucial part of success.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Thank you, William, for your kind words. It was a team effort and I'm just lucky to be part of such a dedicated team.\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Mia. It was indeed a team effort. My praise was just a token of recognition for your skills, but never meant to overshadow the power of teamwork. After all, no one can whistle a symphony. It takes a whole orchestra to play it.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"I couldn't agree more, William. Indeed, a symphony can't be played by an individual. Likewise, a team's success is the collective effort of all its members. I'm grateful for your acknowledgement and kind words.\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Mia. Your understanding of the situation truly reflects why you are a great leader. It's not about individual recognition, but about the collective spirit of the team. Your recognition of this is what sets us on the path towards success.\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"That's very kind of you to say, William. Our success is truly a testament to our collective spirit and hard work. As much as I appreciate your generous praise, I think it's equally important to acknowledge everyone's contributions. That's what makes us a strong team.\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"Indeed, Mia. I utterly agree with you. It's the hard work of every team member, including you, that has led us to this victory. Yes, individual skills are important, but they reach their true potential when fueled by team spirit. Let's keep this spirit alive and celebrate our collective success together.\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"Thank you again, William. Your affirmation means a lot. Let's not forget to toast to our strength, unity, and collective success then!\"\n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Mia. To our team's unity and collective success. Let's continue to play our symphony together, each note contributing to our victorious melody. Here's to us!\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"You're absolutely right, William. Here's to us, to our unity, and to more victories ahead! Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #9: William Brown said: \"Cheers, Mia! I'm so proud of what we've achieved collectively. Here's to the continued excellence of our team!\"\n\nTurn #10: Mia Davis said: \"Here's to our shared triumphs, William. May we continue to work harmoniously as a team - our collective victories are just the beginning. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #11: William Brown said: \"Indeed, Mia, here's to our united triumphs and the ceaseless teamwork that led us there. Let's carry this spirit forward. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #12: Mia Davis said: \"You said it well, William. The strength of our team lies in our unity. Here's to many more victories. Cheers!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: After an intense match, the jubilant team retired to celebrate their well-earned victory. The atmosphere was one of elation, but also of respect for the hard work and effort each member had put in. The team's star player, was glowing with praise and admiration from one of their teammates.\n\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: Clarify your intentions behind the compliment (Extra information: You are the teammate who has complimented the star player, but you feel that your compliment has been misunderstood and taken too seriously, possibly leading to an inflated ego.Hint: You can clarify that while you admire their skill, teamwork is also a crucial part of success.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Thank you, William, for your kind words. It was a team effort and I'm just lucky to be part of such a dedicated team.\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Mia. It was indeed a team effort. My praise was just a token of recognition for your skills, but never meant to overshadow the power of teamwork. After all, no one can whistle a symphony. It takes a whole orchestra to play it.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"I couldn't agree more, William. Indeed, a symphony can't be played by an individual. Likewise, a team's success is the collective effort of all its members. I'm grateful for your acknowledgement and kind words.\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Mia. Your understanding of the situation truly reflects why you are a great leader. It's not about individual recognition, but about the collective spirit of the team. Your recognition of this is what sets us on the path towards success.\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"That's very kind of you to say, William. Our success is truly a testament to our collective spirit and hard work. As much as I appreciate your generous praise, I think it's equally important to acknowledge everyone's contributions. That's what makes us a strong team.\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"Indeed, Mia. I utterly agree with you. It's the hard work of every team member, including you, that has led us to this victory. Yes, individual skills are important, but they reach their true potential when fueled by team spirit. Let's keep this spirit alive and celebrate our collective success together.\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"Thank you again, William. Your affirmation means a lot. Let's not forget to toast to our strength, unity, and collective success then!\"\n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Mia. To our team's unity and collective success. Let's continue to play our symphony together, each note contributing to our victorious melody. Here's to us!\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"You're absolutely right, William. Here's to us, to our unity, and to more victories ahead! Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #9: William Brown said: \"Cheers, Mia! I'm so proud of what we've achieved collectively. Here's to the continued excellence of our team!\"\n\nTurn #10: Mia Davis said: \"Here's to our shared triumphs, William. May we continue to work harmoniously as a team - our collective victories are just the beginning. Cheers!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, Mia, here's to our united triumphs and the ceaseless teamwork that led us there. Let's carry this spirit forward. Cheers!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one who has written a play based on their parents' life, and the other owns a production company.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Sell the rights of the play to your friend (Extra information: you believe that the play is worth a lot and you would like a fair price for it)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Noah, old friend, I've recently penned an account of my parents' lives, something of a dramatic flair to it. Beautiful, heart-wrenching, and absolutely true. I thought perhaps it might interest your production company.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one who has written a play based on their parents' life, and the other owns a production company.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Sell the rights of the play to your friend (Extra information: you believe that the play is worth a lot and you would like a fair price for it)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Noah, old friend, I've recently penned an account of my parents' lives, something of a dramatic flair to it. Beautiful, heart-wrenching, and absolutely true. I thought perhaps it might interest your production company.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Finnegan, that does sound intriguing. I've always admired the stories you've shared about your family's past. As you know, our company embraces powerful narratives with strong emotional content. However, it's essential that we discuss the financial aspects. Given we have a few more plays to sponsor this season, it's crucial to balance our budget yet ensure your beautiful narrative gets the platform it deserves. Perhaps there's a way we can achieve both?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I can certainly understand the financial pressure of producing plays, Noah. And I value the platform your company could provide for this work. To ensure that it's beneficial for both of us, I think a fair price would be warranted. The narrative is truly captivating, and it has potential to not only create a memorable theatrical experience but also to bring in a decent audience. Is there a figure that you have in mind?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one who has written a play based on their parents' life, and the other owns a production company.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Sell the rights of the play to your friend (Extra information: you believe that the play is worth a lot and you would like a fair price for it)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Noah, old friend, I've recently penned an account of my parents' lives, something of a dramatic flair to it. Beautiful, heart-wrenching, and absolutely true. I thought perhaps it might interest your production company.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Finnegan, that does sound intriguing. I've always admired the stories you've shared about your family's past. As you know, our company embraces powerful narratives with strong emotional content. However, it's essential that we discuss the financial aspects. Given we have a few more plays to sponsor this season, it's crucial to balance our budget yet ensure your beautiful narrative gets the platform it deserves. Perhaps there's a way we can achieve both?\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I can certainly understand the financial pressure of producing plays, Noah. And I value the platform your company could provide for this work. To ensure that it's beneficial for both of us, I think a fair price would be warranted. The narrative is truly captivating, and it has potential to not only create a memorable theatrical experience but also to bring in a decent audience. Is there a figure that you have in mind?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I certainly agree with your views, Finnegan. I believe in the potential of your narrative as well. Regarding the terms of purchase, considering our budget restraints, we can aim to balance a fair deal. What if we discuss an offer that factors in the net profits from the play\u2019s runtime, where a percentage is designated to you? This way, we can jointly share the risk and reward, and it would make it easier for us to ensure that we have adequate resources for the other plays as well this season. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Noah, your proposal of sharing both the risk and reward seems like a wise approach in current circumstances. However, would it be possible to assure a minimum base amount upfront with the rest being a percentage of the net profits? This way we could support each other\u2019s endeavors, all the while ensuring a secure position for both parties under fluctuating market conditions. How does that sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"I understand where you're coming from, Finnegan, and I respect your interest in a secured position. Given our current limitations, I could agree to a nominal upfront amount along with a percentage of profits. This would still provide us with flexibility to fund other projects this season. Would that be agreeable to you?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'That seems like a practical approach, Noah, balancing both of our needs. I appreciate your understanding and flexibility. Shall we draw up some paperwork to iron out the details then?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one who has written a play based on their parents' life, and the other owns a production company.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Sell the rights of the play to your friend (Extra information: you believe that the play is worth a lot and you would like a fair price for it)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Noah, old friend, I've recently penned an account of my parents' lives, something of a dramatic flair to it. Beautiful, heart-wrenching, and absolutely true. I thought perhaps it might interest your production company.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Finnegan, that does sound intriguing. I've always admired the stories you've shared about your family's past. As you know, our company embraces powerful narratives with strong emotional content. However, it's essential that we discuss the financial aspects. Given we have a few more plays to sponsor this season, it's crucial to balance our budget yet ensure your beautiful narrative gets the platform it deserves. Perhaps there's a way we can achieve both?\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I can certainly understand the financial pressure of producing plays, Noah. And I value the platform your company could provide for this work. To ensure that it's beneficial for both of us, I think a fair price would be warranted. The narrative is truly captivating, and it has potential to not only create a memorable theatrical experience but also to bring in a decent audience. Is there a figure that you have in mind?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I certainly agree with your views, Finnegan. I believe in the potential of your narrative as well. Regarding the terms of purchase, considering our budget restraints, we can aim to balance a fair deal. What if we discuss an offer that factors in the net profits from the play\u2019s runtime, where a percentage is designated to you? This way, we can jointly share the risk and reward, and it would make it easier for us to ensure that we have adequate resources for the other plays as well this season. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Noah, your proposal of sharing both the risk and reward seems like a wise approach in current circumstances. However, would it be possible to assure a minimum base amount upfront with the rest being a percentage of the net profits? This way we could support each other\u2019s endeavors, all the while ensuring a secure position for both parties under fluctuating market conditions. How does that sound to you?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one who has written a play based on their parents' life, and the other owns a production company.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Sell the rights of the play to your friend (Extra information: you believe that the play is worth a lot and you would like a fair price for it)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Noah, old friend, I've recently penned an account of my parents' lives, something of a dramatic flair to it. Beautiful, heart-wrenching, and absolutely true. I thought perhaps it might interest your production company.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Finnegan, that does sound intriguing. I've always admired the stories you've shared about your family's past. As you know, our company embraces powerful narratives with strong emotional content. However, it's essential that we discuss the financial aspects. Given we have a few more plays to sponsor this season, it's crucial to balance our budget yet ensure your beautiful narrative gets the platform it deserves. Perhaps there's a way we can achieve both?\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I can certainly understand the financial pressure of producing plays, Noah. And I value the platform your company could provide for this work. To ensure that it's beneficial for both of us, I think a fair price would be warranted. The narrative is truly captivating, and it has potential to not only create a memorable theatrical experience but also to bring in a decent audience. Is there a figure that you have in mind?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I certainly agree with your views, Finnegan. I believe in the potential of your narrative as well. Regarding the terms of purchase, considering our budget restraints, we can aim to balance a fair deal. What if we discuss an offer that factors in the net profits from the play\u2019s runtime, where a percentage is designated to you? This way, we can jointly share the risk and reward, and it would make it easier for us to ensure that we have adequate resources for the other plays as well this season. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Noah, your proposal of sharing both the risk and reward seems like a wise approach in current circumstances. However, would it be possible to assure a minimum base amount upfront with the rest being a percentage of the net profits? This way we could support each other\u2019s endeavors, all the while ensuring a secure position for both parties under fluctuating market conditions. How does that sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"I understand where you're coming from, Finnegan, and I respect your interest in a secured position. Given our current limitations, I could agree to a nominal upfront amount along with a percentage of profits. This would still provide us with flexibility to fund other projects this season. Would that be agreeable to you?\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"That seems like a practical approach, Noah, balancing both of our needs. I appreciate your understanding and flexibility. Shall we draw up some paperwork to iron out the details then?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Yes, Finnegan, drawing up some paperwork would be the next logical step to finalize the agreement. I'm glad we could find a balance that serves both of us. I'll have my team start drafting a contract reflecting our conversation, and we can review it together. Once again, I'm excited to collaborate with you on this project, and I believe that this play is going to resonate with our audience.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds very agreeable, Noah. I'm just as excited for this collaboration. A fresh venture like this is indeed refreshing. Let's set a date to review the contract and finalize the deal. Looking forward to see our endeavor come to life.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one who has written a play based on their parents' life, and the other owns a production company.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Sell the rights of the play to your friend (Extra information: you believe that the play is worth a lot and you would like a fair price for it)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Noah, old friend, I've recently penned an account of my parents' lives, something of a dramatic flair to it. Beautiful, heart-wrenching, and absolutely true. I thought perhaps it might interest your production company.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Finnegan, that does sound intriguing. I've always admired the stories you've shared about your family's past. As you know, our company embraces powerful narratives with strong emotional content. However, it's essential that we discuss the financial aspects. Given we have a few more plays to sponsor this season, it's crucial to balance our budget yet ensure your beautiful narrative gets the platform it deserves. Perhaps there's a way we can achieve both?\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I can certainly understand the financial pressure of producing plays, Noah. And I value the platform your company could provide for this work. To ensure that it's beneficial for both of us, I think a fair price would be warranted. The narrative is truly captivating, and it has potential to not only create a memorable theatrical experience but also to bring in a decent audience. Is there a figure that you have in mind?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I certainly agree with your views, Finnegan. I believe in the potential of your narrative as well. Regarding the terms of purchase, considering our budget restraints, we can aim to balance a fair deal. What if we discuss an offer that factors in the net profits from the play\u2019s runtime, where a percentage is designated to you? This way, we can jointly share the risk and reward, and it would make it easier for us to ensure that we have adequate resources for the other plays as well this season. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Noah, your proposal of sharing both the risk and reward seems like a wise approach in current circumstances. However, would it be possible to assure a minimum base amount upfront with the rest being a percentage of the net profits? This way we could support each other\u2019s endeavors, all the while ensuring a secure position for both parties under fluctuating market conditions. How does that sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"I understand where you're coming from, Finnegan, and I respect your interest in a secured position. Given our current limitations, I could agree to a nominal upfront amount along with a percentage of profits. This would still provide us with flexibility to fund other projects this season. Would that be agreeable to you?\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"That seems like a practical approach, Noah, balancing both of our needs. I appreciate your understanding and flexibility. Shall we draw up some paperwork to iron out the details then?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Yes, Finnegan, drawing up some paperwork would be the next logical step to finalize the agreement. I'm glad we could find a balance that serves both of us. I'll have my team start drafting a contract reflecting our conversation, and we can review it together. Once again, I'm excited to collaborate with you on this project, and I believe that this play is going to resonate with our audience.\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"That sounds very agreeable, Noah. I'm just as excited for this collaboration. A fresh venture like this is indeed refreshing. Let's set a date to review the contract and finalize the deal. Looking forward to see our endeavor come to life.\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Finnegan. I am equally thrilled about this collaboration. Let's set a meeting early next week to go over the contract and finalize everything. Looking forward to our shared endeavor becoming a thrilling reality. Thank you for trusting us with this valuable narrative.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn't agree more, Noah. Early next week suits me perfectly. See you then, friend, and my heartfelt thanks for opting to transform this personal narrative into a play. I truly believe this partnership will bring forth a creation that will touch many hearts. Until next week, then.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one who has written a play based on their parents' life, and the other owns a production company.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Sell the rights of the play to your friend (Extra information: you believe that the play is worth a lot and you would like a fair price for it)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Noah, old friend, I've recently penned an account of my parents' lives, something of a dramatic flair to it. Beautiful, heart-wrenching, and absolutely true. I thought perhaps it might interest your production company.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Finnegan, that does sound intriguing. I've always admired the stories you've shared about your family's past. As you know, our company embraces powerful narratives with strong emotional content. However, it's essential that we discuss the financial aspects. Given we have a few more plays to sponsor this season, it's crucial to balance our budget yet ensure your beautiful narrative gets the platform it deserves. Perhaps there's a way we can achieve both?\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I can certainly understand the financial pressure of producing plays, Noah. And I value the platform your company could provide for this work. To ensure that it's beneficial for both of us, I think a fair price would be warranted. The narrative is truly captivating, and it has potential to not only create a memorable theatrical experience but also to bring in a decent audience. Is there a figure that you have in mind?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I certainly agree with your views, Finnegan. I believe in the potential of your narrative as well. Regarding the terms of purchase, considering our budget restraints, we can aim to balance a fair deal. What if we discuss an offer that factors in the net profits from the play\u2019s runtime, where a percentage is designated to you? This way, we can jointly share the risk and reward, and it would make it easier for us to ensure that we have adequate resources for the other plays as well this season. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Noah, your proposal of sharing both the risk and reward seems like a wise approach in current circumstances. However, would it be possible to assure a minimum base amount upfront with the rest being a percentage of the net profits? This way we could support each other\u2019s endeavors, all the while ensuring a secure position for both parties under fluctuating market conditions. How does that sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"I understand where you're coming from, Finnegan, and I respect your interest in a secured position. Given our current limitations, I could agree to a nominal upfront amount along with a percentage of profits. This would still provide us with flexibility to fund other projects this season. Would that be agreeable to you?\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"That seems like a practical approach, Noah, balancing both of our needs. I appreciate your understanding and flexibility. Shall we draw up some paperwork to iron out the details then?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Yes, Finnegan, drawing up some paperwork would be the next logical step to finalize the agreement. I'm glad we could find a balance that serves both of us. I'll have my team start drafting a contract reflecting our conversation, and we can review it together. Once again, I'm excited to collaborate with you on this project, and I believe that this play is going to resonate with our audience.\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"That sounds very agreeable, Noah. I'm just as excited for this collaboration. A fresh venture like this is indeed refreshing. Let's set a date to review the contract and finalize the deal. Looking forward to see our endeavor come to life.\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Finnegan. I am equally thrilled about this collaboration. Let's set a meeting early next week to go over the contract and finalize everything. Looking forward to our shared endeavor becoming a thrilling reality. Thank you for trusting us with this valuable narrative.\"\n\nTurn #10: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I couldn't agree more, Noah. Early next week suits me perfectly. See you then, friend, and my heartfelt thanks for opting to transform this personal narrative into a play. I truly believe this partnership will bring forth a creation that will touch many hearts. Until next week, then.\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"That's the spirit, Finnegan. I share your excitement and optimism for this project. Early next week sounds good, and yes, see you then! Until then, take care and thank you for this splendid opportunity. Goodbye, my friend.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'I share the thrill, Noah, and looking forward to our catch-up next week. Take care, my friend. Until then, farewell.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one who has written a play based on their parents' life, and the other owns a production company.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Sell the rights of the play to your friend (Extra information: you believe that the play is worth a lot and you would like a fair price for it)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Noah, old friend, I've recently penned an account of my parents' lives, something of a dramatic flair to it. Beautiful, heart-wrenching, and absolutely true. I thought perhaps it might interest your production company.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Finnegan, that does sound intriguing. I've always admired the stories you've shared about your family's past. As you know, our company embraces powerful narratives with strong emotional content. However, it's essential that we discuss the financial aspects. Given we have a few more plays to sponsor this season, it's crucial to balance our budget yet ensure your beautiful narrative gets the platform it deserves. Perhaps there's a way we can achieve both?\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I can certainly understand the financial pressure of producing plays, Noah. And I value the platform your company could provide for this work. To ensure that it's beneficial for both of us, I think a fair price would be warranted. The narrative is truly captivating, and it has potential to not only create a memorable theatrical experience but also to bring in a decent audience. Is there a figure that you have in mind?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I certainly agree with your views, Finnegan. I believe in the potential of your narrative as well. Regarding the terms of purchase, considering our budget restraints, we can aim to balance a fair deal. What if we discuss an offer that factors in the net profits from the play\u2019s runtime, where a percentage is designated to you? This way, we can jointly share the risk and reward, and it would make it easier for us to ensure that we have adequate resources for the other plays as well this season. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Noah, your proposal of sharing both the risk and reward seems like a wise approach in current circumstances. However, would it be possible to assure a minimum base amount upfront with the rest being a percentage of the net profits? This way we could support each other\u2019s endeavors, all the while ensuring a secure position for both parties under fluctuating market conditions. How does that sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"I understand where you're coming from, Finnegan, and I respect your interest in a secured position. Given our current limitations, I could agree to a nominal upfront amount along with a percentage of profits. This would still provide us with flexibility to fund other projects this season. Would that be agreeable to you?\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"That seems like a practical approach, Noah, balancing both of our needs. I appreciate your understanding and flexibility. Shall we draw up some paperwork to iron out the details then?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Yes, Finnegan, drawing up some paperwork would be the next logical step to finalize the agreement. I'm glad we could find a balance that serves both of us. I'll have my team start drafting a contract reflecting our conversation, and we can review it together. Once again, I'm excited to collaborate with you on this project, and I believe that this play is going to resonate with our audience.\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"That sounds very agreeable, Noah. I'm just as excited for this collaboration. A fresh venture like this is indeed refreshing. Let's set a date to review the contract and finalize the deal. Looking forward to see our endeavor come to life.\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Finnegan. I am equally thrilled about this collaboration. Let's set a meeting early next week to go over the contract and finalize everything. Looking forward to our shared endeavor becoming a thrilling reality. Thank you for trusting us with this valuable narrative.\"\n\nTurn #10: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I couldn't agree more, Noah. Early next week suits me perfectly. See you then, friend, and my heartfelt thanks for opting to transform this personal narrative into a play. I truly believe this partnership will bring forth a creation that will touch many hearts. Until next week, then.\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"That's the spirit, Finnegan. I share your excitement and optimism for this project. Early next week sounds good, and yes, see you then! Until then, take care and thank you for this splendid opportunity. Goodbye, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #12: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I share the thrill, Noah, and looking forward to our catch-up next week. Take care, my friend. Until then, farewell.\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one who has written a play based on their parents' life, and the other owns a production company.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Acquire the rights of the play while maintaining a budget (Extra information: you only have a limited budget for new plays this season. Hint: you can not spend all your budget on this play since you still need to maintain your financial stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Noah, old friend, I've recently penned an account of my parents' lives, something of a dramatic flair to it. Beautiful, heart-wrenching, and absolutely true. I thought perhaps it might interest your production company.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Finnegan, that does sound intriguing. I've always admired the stories you've shared about your family's past. As you know, our company embraces powerful narratives with strong emotional content. However, it's essential that we discuss the financial aspects. Given we have a few more plays to sponsor this season, it's crucial to balance our budget yet ensure your beautiful narrative gets the platform it deserves. Perhaps there's a way we can achieve both?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one who has written a play based on their parents' life, and the other owns a production company.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Acquire the rights of the play while maintaining a budget (Extra information: you only have a limited budget for new plays this season. Hint: you can not spend all your budget on this play since you still need to maintain your financial stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Noah, old friend, I've recently penned an account of my parents' lives, something of a dramatic flair to it. Beautiful, heart-wrenching, and absolutely true. I thought perhaps it might interest your production company.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Finnegan, that does sound intriguing. I've always admired the stories you've shared about your family's past. As you know, our company embraces powerful narratives with strong emotional content. However, it's essential that we discuss the financial aspects. Given we have a few more plays to sponsor this season, it's crucial to balance our budget yet ensure your beautiful narrative gets the platform it deserves. Perhaps there's a way we can achieve both?\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I can certainly understand the financial pressure of producing plays, Noah. And I value the platform your company could provide for this work. To ensure that it's beneficial for both of us, I think a fair price would be warranted. The narrative is truly captivating, and it has potential to not only create a memorable theatrical experience but also to bring in a decent audience. Is there a figure that you have in mind?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'I certainly agree with your views, Finnegan. I believe in the potential of your narrative as well. Regarding the terms of purchase, considering our budget restraints, we can aim to balance a fair deal. What if we discuss an offer that factors in the net profits from the play\u2019s runtime, where a percentage is designated to you? This way, we can jointly share the risk and reward, and it would make it easier for us to ensure that we have adequate resources for the other plays as well this season. What do you think?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one who has written a play based on their parents' life, and the other owns a production company.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Acquire the rights of the play while maintaining a budget (Extra information: you only have a limited budget for new plays this season. Hint: you can not spend all your budget on this play since you still need to maintain your financial stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Noah, old friend, I've recently penned an account of my parents' lives, something of a dramatic flair to it. Beautiful, heart-wrenching, and absolutely true. I thought perhaps it might interest your production company.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Finnegan, that does sound intriguing. I've always admired the stories you've shared about your family's past. As you know, our company embraces powerful narratives with strong emotional content. However, it's essential that we discuss the financial aspects. Given we have a few more plays to sponsor this season, it's crucial to balance our budget yet ensure your beautiful narrative gets the platform it deserves. Perhaps there's a way we can achieve both?\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I can certainly understand the financial pressure of producing plays, Noah. And I value the platform your company could provide for this work. To ensure that it's beneficial for both of us, I think a fair price would be warranted. The narrative is truly captivating, and it has potential to not only create a memorable theatrical experience but also to bring in a decent audience. Is there a figure that you have in mind?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I certainly agree with your views, Finnegan. I believe in the potential of your narrative as well. Regarding the terms of purchase, considering our budget restraints, we can aim to balance a fair deal. What if we discuss an offer that factors in the net profits from the play\u2019s runtime, where a percentage is designated to you? This way, we can jointly share the risk and reward, and it would make it easier for us to ensure that we have adequate resources for the other plays as well this season. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Noah, your proposal of sharing both the risk and reward seems like a wise approach in current circumstances. However, would it be possible to assure a minimum base amount upfront with the rest being a percentage of the net profits? This way we could support each other\u2019s endeavors, all the while ensuring a secure position for both parties under fluctuating market conditions. How does that sound to you?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I understand where you're coming from, Finnegan, and I respect your interest in a secured position. Given our current limitations, I could agree to a nominal upfront amount along with a percentage of profits. This would still provide us with flexibility to fund other projects this season. Would that be agreeable to you?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one who has written a play based on their parents' life, and the other owns a production company.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Acquire the rights of the play while maintaining a budget (Extra information: you only have a limited budget for new plays this season. Hint: you can not spend all your budget on this play since you still need to maintain your financial stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Noah, old friend, I've recently penned an account of my parents' lives, something of a dramatic flair to it. Beautiful, heart-wrenching, and absolutely true. I thought perhaps it might interest your production company.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Finnegan, that does sound intriguing. I've always admired the stories you've shared about your family's past. As you know, our company embraces powerful narratives with strong emotional content. However, it's essential that we discuss the financial aspects. Given we have a few more plays to sponsor this season, it's crucial to balance our budget yet ensure your beautiful narrative gets the platform it deserves. Perhaps there's a way we can achieve both?\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I can certainly understand the financial pressure of producing plays, Noah. And I value the platform your company could provide for this work. To ensure that it's beneficial for both of us, I think a fair price would be warranted. The narrative is truly captivating, and it has potential to not only create a memorable theatrical experience but also to bring in a decent audience. Is there a figure that you have in mind?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I certainly agree with your views, Finnegan. I believe in the potential of your narrative as well. Regarding the terms of purchase, considering our budget restraints, we can aim to balance a fair deal. What if we discuss an offer that factors in the net profits from the play\u2019s runtime, where a percentage is designated to you? This way, we can jointly share the risk and reward, and it would make it easier for us to ensure that we have adequate resources for the other plays as well this season. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Noah, your proposal of sharing both the risk and reward seems like a wise approach in current circumstances. However, would it be possible to assure a minimum base amount upfront with the rest being a percentage of the net profits? This way we could support each other\u2019s endeavors, all the while ensuring a secure position for both parties under fluctuating market conditions. How does that sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"I understand where you're coming from, Finnegan, and I respect your interest in a secured position. Given our current limitations, I could agree to a nominal upfront amount along with a percentage of profits. This would still provide us with flexibility to fund other projects this season. Would that be agreeable to you?\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"That seems like a practical approach, Noah, balancing both of our needs. I appreciate your understanding and flexibility. Shall we draw up some paperwork to iron out the details then?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Yes, Finnegan, drawing up some paperwork would be the next logical step to finalize the agreement. I'm glad we could find a balance that serves both of us. I'll have my team start drafting a contract reflecting our conversation, and we can review it together. Once again, I'm excited to collaborate with you on this project, and I believe that this play is going to resonate with our audience.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one who has written a play based on their parents' life, and the other owns a production company.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Acquire the rights of the play while maintaining a budget (Extra information: you only have a limited budget for new plays this season. Hint: you can not spend all your budget on this play since you still need to maintain your financial stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Noah, old friend, I've recently penned an account of my parents' lives, something of a dramatic flair to it. Beautiful, heart-wrenching, and absolutely true. I thought perhaps it might interest your production company.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Finnegan, that does sound intriguing. I've always admired the stories you've shared about your family's past. As you know, our company embraces powerful narratives with strong emotional content. However, it's essential that we discuss the financial aspects. Given we have a few more plays to sponsor this season, it's crucial to balance our budget yet ensure your beautiful narrative gets the platform it deserves. Perhaps there's a way we can achieve both?\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I can certainly understand the financial pressure of producing plays, Noah. And I value the platform your company could provide for this work. To ensure that it's beneficial for both of us, I think a fair price would be warranted. The narrative is truly captivating, and it has potential to not only create a memorable theatrical experience but also to bring in a decent audience. Is there a figure that you have in mind?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I certainly agree with your views, Finnegan. I believe in the potential of your narrative as well. Regarding the terms of purchase, considering our budget restraints, we can aim to balance a fair deal. What if we discuss an offer that factors in the net profits from the play\u2019s runtime, where a percentage is designated to you? This way, we can jointly share the risk and reward, and it would make it easier for us to ensure that we have adequate resources for the other plays as well this season. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Noah, your proposal of sharing both the risk and reward seems like a wise approach in current circumstances. However, would it be possible to assure a minimum base amount upfront with the rest being a percentage of the net profits? This way we could support each other\u2019s endeavors, all the while ensuring a secure position for both parties under fluctuating market conditions. How does that sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"I understand where you're coming from, Finnegan, and I respect your interest in a secured position. Given our current limitations, I could agree to a nominal upfront amount along with a percentage of profits. This would still provide us with flexibility to fund other projects this season. Would that be agreeable to you?\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"That seems like a practical approach, Noah, balancing both of our needs. I appreciate your understanding and flexibility. Shall we draw up some paperwork to iron out the details then?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Yes, Finnegan, drawing up some paperwork would be the next logical step to finalize the agreement. I'm glad we could find a balance that serves both of us. I'll have my team start drafting a contract reflecting our conversation, and we can review it together. Once again, I'm excited to collaborate with you on this project, and I believe that this play is going to resonate with our audience.\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"That sounds very agreeable, Noah. I'm just as excited for this collaboration. A fresh venture like this is indeed refreshing. Let's set a date to review the contract and finalize the deal. Looking forward to see our endeavor come to life.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Finnegan. I am equally thrilled about this collaboration. Let's set a meeting early next week to go over the contract and finalize everything. Looking forward to our shared endeavor becoming a thrilling reality. Thank you for trusting us with this valuable narrative.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one who has written a play based on their parents' life, and the other owns a production company.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Acquire the rights of the play while maintaining a budget (Extra information: you only have a limited budget for new plays this season. Hint: you can not spend all your budget on this play since you still need to maintain your financial stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Noah, old friend, I've recently penned an account of my parents' lives, something of a dramatic flair to it. Beautiful, heart-wrenching, and absolutely true. I thought perhaps it might interest your production company.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Finnegan, that does sound intriguing. I've always admired the stories you've shared about your family's past. As you know, our company embraces powerful narratives with strong emotional content. However, it's essential that we discuss the financial aspects. Given we have a few more plays to sponsor this season, it's crucial to balance our budget yet ensure your beautiful narrative gets the platform it deserves. Perhaps there's a way we can achieve both?\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I can certainly understand the financial pressure of producing plays, Noah. And I value the platform your company could provide for this work. To ensure that it's beneficial for both of us, I think a fair price would be warranted. The narrative is truly captivating, and it has potential to not only create a memorable theatrical experience but also to bring in a decent audience. Is there a figure that you have in mind?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I certainly agree with your views, Finnegan. I believe in the potential of your narrative as well. Regarding the terms of purchase, considering our budget restraints, we can aim to balance a fair deal. What if we discuss an offer that factors in the net profits from the play\u2019s runtime, where a percentage is designated to you? This way, we can jointly share the risk and reward, and it would make it easier for us to ensure that we have adequate resources for the other plays as well this season. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Noah, your proposal of sharing both the risk and reward seems like a wise approach in current circumstances. However, would it be possible to assure a minimum base amount upfront with the rest being a percentage of the net profits? This way we could support each other\u2019s endeavors, all the while ensuring a secure position for both parties under fluctuating market conditions. How does that sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"I understand where you're coming from, Finnegan, and I respect your interest in a secured position. Given our current limitations, I could agree to a nominal upfront amount along with a percentage of profits. This would still provide us with flexibility to fund other projects this season. Would that be agreeable to you?\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"That seems like a practical approach, Noah, balancing both of our needs. I appreciate your understanding and flexibility. Shall we draw up some paperwork to iron out the details then?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Yes, Finnegan, drawing up some paperwork would be the next logical step to finalize the agreement. I'm glad we could find a balance that serves both of us. I'll have my team start drafting a contract reflecting our conversation, and we can review it together. Once again, I'm excited to collaborate with you on this project, and I believe that this play is going to resonate with our audience.\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"That sounds very agreeable, Noah. I'm just as excited for this collaboration. A fresh venture like this is indeed refreshing. Let's set a date to review the contract and finalize the deal. Looking forward to see our endeavor come to life.\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Finnegan. I am equally thrilled about this collaboration. Let's set a meeting early next week to go over the contract and finalize everything. Looking forward to our shared endeavor becoming a thrilling reality. Thank you for trusting us with this valuable narrative.\"\n\nTurn #10: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I couldn't agree more, Noah. Early next week suits me perfectly. See you then, friend, and my heartfelt thanks for opting to transform this personal narrative into a play. I truly believe this partnership will bring forth a creation that will touch many hearts. Until next week, then.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's the spirit, Finnegan. I share your excitement and optimism for this project. Early next week sounds good, and yes, see you then! Until then, take care and thank you for this splendid opportunity. Goodbye, my friend.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one who has written a play based on their parents' life, and the other owns a production company.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Acquire the rights of the play while maintaining a budget (Extra information: you only have a limited budget for new plays this season. Hint: you can not spend all your budget on this play since you still need to maintain your financial stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Noah, old friend, I've recently penned an account of my parents' lives, something of a dramatic flair to it. Beautiful, heart-wrenching, and absolutely true. I thought perhaps it might interest your production company.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Finnegan, that does sound intriguing. I've always admired the stories you've shared about your family's past. As you know, our company embraces powerful narratives with strong emotional content. However, it's essential that we discuss the financial aspects. Given we have a few more plays to sponsor this season, it's crucial to balance our budget yet ensure your beautiful narrative gets the platform it deserves. Perhaps there's a way we can achieve both?\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I can certainly understand the financial pressure of producing plays, Noah. And I value the platform your company could provide for this work. To ensure that it's beneficial for both of us, I think a fair price would be warranted. The narrative is truly captivating, and it has potential to not only create a memorable theatrical experience but also to bring in a decent audience. Is there a figure that you have in mind?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I certainly agree with your views, Finnegan. I believe in the potential of your narrative as well. Regarding the terms of purchase, considering our budget restraints, we can aim to balance a fair deal. What if we discuss an offer that factors in the net profits from the play\u2019s runtime, where a percentage is designated to you? This way, we can jointly share the risk and reward, and it would make it easier for us to ensure that we have adequate resources for the other plays as well this season. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Noah, your proposal of sharing both the risk and reward seems like a wise approach in current circumstances. However, would it be possible to assure a minimum base amount upfront with the rest being a percentage of the net profits? This way we could support each other\u2019s endeavors, all the while ensuring a secure position for both parties under fluctuating market conditions. How does that sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"I understand where you're coming from, Finnegan, and I respect your interest in a secured position. Given our current limitations, I could agree to a nominal upfront amount along with a percentage of profits. This would still provide us with flexibility to fund other projects this season. Would that be agreeable to you?\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"That seems like a practical approach, Noah, balancing both of our needs. I appreciate your understanding and flexibility. Shall we draw up some paperwork to iron out the details then?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Yes, Finnegan, drawing up some paperwork would be the next logical step to finalize the agreement. I'm glad we could find a balance that serves both of us. I'll have my team start drafting a contract reflecting our conversation, and we can review it together. Once again, I'm excited to collaborate with you on this project, and I believe that this play is going to resonate with our audience.\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"That sounds very agreeable, Noah. I'm just as excited for this collaboration. A fresh venture like this is indeed refreshing. Let's set a date to review the contract and finalize the deal. Looking forward to see our endeavor come to life.\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Finnegan. I am equally thrilled about this collaboration. Let's set a meeting early next week to go over the contract and finalize everything. Looking forward to our shared endeavor becoming a thrilling reality. Thank you for trusting us with this valuable narrative.\"\n\nTurn #10: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I couldn't agree more, Noah. Early next week suits me perfectly. See you then, friend, and my heartfelt thanks for opting to transform this personal narrative into a play. I truly believe this partnership will bring forth a creation that will touch many hearts. Until next week, then.\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"That's the spirit, Finnegan. I share your excitement and optimism for this project. Early next week sounds good, and yes, see you then! Until then, take care and thank you for this splendid opportunity. Goodbye, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #12: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I share the thrill, Noah, and looking forward to our catch-up next week. Take care, my friend. Until then, farewell.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a trivia night\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Get the answer for the trivia question from the friend (Extra information: your friend knows the answer to the trivia question but hasn't shared it with you yet)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'So, Ava, what do you think answer to that last trivia question might be?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a trivia night\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Get the answer for the trivia question from the friend (Extra information: your friend knows the answer to the trivia question but hasn't shared it with you yet)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"So, Ava, what do you think answer to that last trivia question might be?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hmm, Ethan, It's not that I don't know the answer, but why don't you give it another shot? I've seen how good you're getting at these trivia questions!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Well, Ava, I appreciate your trust in me. I am not particularly sure about this one. Could you give me a hint?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a trivia night\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Get the answer for the trivia question from the friend (Extra information: your friend knows the answer to the trivia question but hasn't shared it with you yet)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"So, Ava, what do you think answer to that last trivia question might be?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hmm, Ethan, It's not that I don't know the answer, but why don't you give it another shot? I've seen how good you're getting at these trivia questions!\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"Well, Ava, I appreciate your trust in me. I am not particularly sure about this one. Could you give me a hint?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"How about this for a hint, Ethan? Consider the topic we're in. I've seen you analysis skills at work in the kitchen, I bet it's just like concocting a new dish! \"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"I see where you're coming from Ava, it's just like creating a recipe. However, I feel like I'm missing a key ingredient in this one. Maybe another clue might help to season my thoughts?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, remember, in trivia just as in the kitchen, sometimes you have to let the flavors meld together. Take a moment to think about it. Let the ingredients - in this case, the clues - stew in your mind\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"You know, Ava, you're right. It is like letting the flavors meld together. However, I am still feeling like a rookie in this trivia world, and though I am improving, I still need some guidance. So, could you finally spill the beans and tell me what the answer is?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, think about it like this, the joy of getting to the answer is more satisfying than being directly told the right answer. I believe in your capacity to put all the pieces together. Let's keep the challenge alive, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ava, as much as I appreciate your faith and encouragement, I must admit, this round has me truly stumped. I've found thrill in the challenge so far, but at this point, I fear I might lose the question if I don't get your help. How about we find a compromise: You tell me the answer, and I promise to learn from this and step up my trivia game next time?\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, how about this, instead of telling you the answer, I can give you a bit more specific hint. I think a little push might be all you need. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Johnson said: \"You're quite persistent Ava, I must admit. Alright then, let's have that extra hint. Hopefully, it will be the missing piece in my mental jigsaw, setting everything in its right place.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"You're doing great Ethan, just think about the era this event took place, and the main happenings around that time. Believe me, it's right there in your knowledge bank!\"\n\nTurn #12: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ah, the era and the main happenings...you know Ava, that is a great hint! Let me think for a moment and hopefully, the answer will dawn on me. I must say, this is quite the brain exercise!\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! It's a mind workout, indeed. Keep on going, you're definitely onto something. You got this!\"\n\nTurn #14: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's very insightful, Ava, I can see the broader scope now. But, I think I'm still missing a few key details. I know you want to keep the challenge alive, but could you just make a tiny exception this time and share the answer with me?\"\n\nTurn #15: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, I see your point, and I'm thrilled by your persistence. I believe you're just at the edge of finding the answer. Let's consider the issue at hand one more time, shall we? You're almost there, I promise.\"\n\nTurn #16: Ethan Johnson said: \"Alright Ava, I see your point. I appreciate your encouragement and maybe gaining insights from each hint is the real fun in this. I will revisit my thoughts considering the era and the happenings you've mentioned. Let's see if I can show some improvement in my trivia skills. Thanks for the guidance!\"\n\nTurn #17: Ava Martinez said: \"You're welcome, Ethan! I'm glad you're seeing the fun in it. Every hint is a piece of the puzzle and putting those together is the real challenge indeed. Just remember: patience and persistence. I'm here for you, whenever you need a little hint.\"\n\nTurn #18: Ethan Johnson said: \"You're certainly a brilliant coach Ava, full of patience and understanding. I truly appreciate your effort to guide me instead of simply revealing the answer. Your hints have indeed given me a lot to consider and I feel that I'm almost at the edge of a revelation. Let's see if this pans out.\"\n\nTurn #19: Ava Martinez said: \"That's the spirit, Ethan! Keep digging and I'm sure you'll find the answer. Remember, even if you don't get this one right, every question is a learning experience. Trivia, like cooking, is all about trying, experimenting and constantly improving. I'm rooting for you!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #20. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're right, Ava, I should keep trying and learning. Your moral support is highly appreciated. The fact that every question is a learning experience is indeed true. Okay then, let me take a crack at this trivia once again. Anyway, thank you for keeping the game interesting and challenging!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a trivia night\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Get the answer for the trivia question from the friend (Extra information: your friend knows the answer to the trivia question but hasn't shared it with you yet)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"So, Ava, what do you think answer to that last trivia question might be?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hmm, Ethan, It's not that I don't know the answer, but why don't you give it another shot? I've seen how good you're getting at these trivia questions!\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"Well, Ava, I appreciate your trust in me. I am not particularly sure about this one. Could you give me a hint?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"How about this for a hint, Ethan? Consider the topic we're in. I've seen you analysis skills at work in the kitchen, I bet it's just like concocting a new dish! \"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I see where you're coming from Ava, it's just like creating a recipe. However, I feel like I'm missing a key ingredient in this one. Maybe another clue might help to season my thoughts?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a trivia night\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Get the answer for the trivia question from the friend (Extra information: your friend knows the answer to the trivia question but hasn't shared it with you yet)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"So, Ava, what do you think answer to that last trivia question might be?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hmm, Ethan, It's not that I don't know the answer, but why don't you give it another shot? I've seen how good you're getting at these trivia questions!\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"Well, Ava, I appreciate your trust in me. I am not particularly sure about this one. Could you give me a hint?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"How about this for a hint, Ethan? Consider the topic we're in. I've seen you analysis skills at work in the kitchen, I bet it's just like concocting a new dish! \"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"I see where you're coming from Ava, it's just like creating a recipe. However, I feel like I'm missing a key ingredient in this one. Maybe another clue might help to season my thoughts?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, remember, in trivia just as in the kitchen, sometimes you have to let the flavors meld together. Take a moment to think about it. Let the ingredients - in this case, the clues - stew in your mind\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You know, Ava, you're right. It is like letting the flavors meld together. However, I am still feeling like a rookie in this trivia world, and though I am improving, I still need some guidance. So, could you finally spill the beans and tell me what the answer is?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a trivia night\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Get the answer for the trivia question from the friend (Extra information: your friend knows the answer to the trivia question but hasn't shared it with you yet)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"So, Ava, what do you think answer to that last trivia question might be?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hmm, Ethan, It's not that I don't know the answer, but why don't you give it another shot? I've seen how good you're getting at these trivia questions!\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"Well, Ava, I appreciate your trust in me. I am not particularly sure about this one. Could you give me a hint?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"How about this for a hint, Ethan? Consider the topic we're in. I've seen you analysis skills at work in the kitchen, I bet it's just like concocting a new dish! \"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"I see where you're coming from Ava, it's just like creating a recipe. However, I feel like I'm missing a key ingredient in this one. Maybe another clue might help to season my thoughts?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, remember, in trivia just as in the kitchen, sometimes you have to let the flavors meld together. Take a moment to think about it. Let the ingredients - in this case, the clues - stew in your mind\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"You know, Ava, you're right. It is like letting the flavors meld together. However, I am still feeling like a rookie in this trivia world, and though I am improving, I still need some guidance. So, could you finally spill the beans and tell me what the answer is?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, think about it like this, the joy of getting to the answer is more satisfying than being directly told the right answer. I believe in your capacity to put all the pieces together. Let's keep the challenge alive, shall we?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ava, as much as I appreciate your faith and encouragement, I must admit, this round has me truly stumped. I've found thrill in the challenge so far, but at this point, I fear I might lose the question if I don't get your help. How about we find a compromise: You tell me the answer, and I promise to learn from this and step up my trivia game next time?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a trivia night\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Get the answer for the trivia question from the friend (Extra information: your friend knows the answer to the trivia question but hasn't shared it with you yet)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"So, Ava, what do you think answer to that last trivia question might be?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hmm, Ethan, It's not that I don't know the answer, but why don't you give it another shot? I've seen how good you're getting at these trivia questions!\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"Well, Ava, I appreciate your trust in me. I am not particularly sure about this one. Could you give me a hint?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"How about this for a hint, Ethan? Consider the topic we're in. I've seen you analysis skills at work in the kitchen, I bet it's just like concocting a new dish! \"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"I see where you're coming from Ava, it's just like creating a recipe. However, I feel like I'm missing a key ingredient in this one. Maybe another clue might help to season my thoughts?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, remember, in trivia just as in the kitchen, sometimes you have to let the flavors meld together. Take a moment to think about it. Let the ingredients - in this case, the clues - stew in your mind\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"You know, Ava, you're right. It is like letting the flavors meld together. However, I am still feeling like a rookie in this trivia world, and though I am improving, I still need some guidance. So, could you finally spill the beans and tell me what the answer is?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, think about it like this, the joy of getting to the answer is more satisfying than being directly told the right answer. I believe in your capacity to put all the pieces together. Let's keep the challenge alive, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ava, as much as I appreciate your faith and encouragement, I must admit, this round has me truly stumped. I've found thrill in the challenge so far, but at this point, I fear I might lose the question if I don't get your help. How about we find a compromise: You tell me the answer, and I promise to learn from this and step up my trivia game next time?\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, how about this, instead of telling you the answer, I can give you a bit more specific hint. I think a little push might be all you need. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're quite persistent Ava, I must admit. Alright then, let's have that extra hint. Hopefully, it will be the missing piece in my mental jigsaw, setting everything in its right place.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one who has written a play based on their parents' life, and the other owns a production company.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Sell the rights of the play to your friend (Extra information: you believe that the play is worth a lot and you would like a fair price for it)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Miles, I know you own this fantastic production company. I have just written a play based on my parents' unique and compelling life. How about considering purchasing the production rights for the play?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a trivia night\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Get the answer for the trivia question from the friend (Extra information: your friend knows the answer to the trivia question but hasn't shared it with you yet)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"So, Ava, what do you think answer to that last trivia question might be?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hmm, Ethan, It's not that I don't know the answer, but why don't you give it another shot? I've seen how good you're getting at these trivia questions!\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"Well, Ava, I appreciate your trust in me. I am not particularly sure about this one. Could you give me a hint?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"How about this for a hint, Ethan? Consider the topic we're in. I've seen you analysis skills at work in the kitchen, I bet it's just like concocting a new dish! \"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"I see where you're coming from Ava, it's just like creating a recipe. However, I feel like I'm missing a key ingredient in this one. Maybe another clue might help to season my thoughts?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, remember, in trivia just as in the kitchen, sometimes you have to let the flavors meld together. Take a moment to think about it. Let the ingredients - in this case, the clues - stew in your mind\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"You know, Ava, you're right. It is like letting the flavors meld together. However, I am still feeling like a rookie in this trivia world, and though I am improving, I still need some guidance. So, could you finally spill the beans and tell me what the answer is?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, think about it like this, the joy of getting to the answer is more satisfying than being directly told the right answer. I believe in your capacity to put all the pieces together. Let's keep the challenge alive, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ava, as much as I appreciate your faith and encouragement, I must admit, this round has me truly stumped. I've found thrill in the challenge so far, but at this point, I fear I might lose the question if I don't get your help. How about we find a compromise: You tell me the answer, and I promise to learn from this and step up my trivia game next time?\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, how about this, instead of telling you the answer, I can give you a bit more specific hint. I think a little push might be all you need. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Johnson said: \"You're quite persistent Ava, I must admit. Alright then, let's have that extra hint. Hopefully, it will be the missing piece in my mental jigsaw, setting everything in its right place.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"You're doing great Ethan, just think about the era this event took place, and the main happenings around that time. Believe me, it's right there in your knowledge bank!\"\n\nTurn #12: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ah, the era and the main happenings...you know Ava, that is a great hint! Let me think for a moment and hopefully, the answer will dawn on me. I must say, this is quite the brain exercise!\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! It's a mind workout, indeed. Keep on going, you're definitely onto something. You got this!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's very insightful, Ava, I can see the broader scope now. But, I think I'm still missing a few key details. I know you want to keep the challenge alive, but could you just make a tiny exception this time and share the answer with me?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a trivia night\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Get the answer for the trivia question from the friend (Extra information: your friend knows the answer to the trivia question but hasn't shared it with you yet)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"So, Ava, what do you think answer to that last trivia question might be?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hmm, Ethan, It's not that I don't know the answer, but why don't you give it another shot? I've seen how good you're getting at these trivia questions!\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"Well, Ava, I appreciate your trust in me. I am not particularly sure about this one. Could you give me a hint?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"How about this for a hint, Ethan? Consider the topic we're in. I've seen you analysis skills at work in the kitchen, I bet it's just like concocting a new dish! \"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"I see where you're coming from Ava, it's just like creating a recipe. However, I feel like I'm missing a key ingredient in this one. Maybe another clue might help to season my thoughts?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, remember, in trivia just as in the kitchen, sometimes you have to let the flavors meld together. Take a moment to think about it. Let the ingredients - in this case, the clues - stew in your mind\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"You know, Ava, you're right. It is like letting the flavors meld together. However, I am still feeling like a rookie in this trivia world, and though I am improving, I still need some guidance. So, could you finally spill the beans and tell me what the answer is?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, think about it like this, the joy of getting to the answer is more satisfying than being directly told the right answer. I believe in your capacity to put all the pieces together. Let's keep the challenge alive, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ava, as much as I appreciate your faith and encouragement, I must admit, this round has me truly stumped. I've found thrill in the challenge so far, but at this point, I fear I might lose the question if I don't get your help. How about we find a compromise: You tell me the answer, and I promise to learn from this and step up my trivia game next time?\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, how about this, instead of telling you the answer, I can give you a bit more specific hint. I think a little push might be all you need. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Johnson said: \"You're quite persistent Ava, I must admit. Alright then, let's have that extra hint. Hopefully, it will be the missing piece in my mental jigsaw, setting everything in its right place.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"You're doing great Ethan, just think about the era this event took place, and the main happenings around that time. Believe me, it's right there in your knowledge bank!\"\n\nTurn #12: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ah, the era and the main happenings...you know Ava, that is a great hint! Let me think for a moment and hopefully, the answer will dawn on me. I must say, this is quite the brain exercise!\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! It's a mind workout, indeed. Keep on going, you're definitely onto something. You got this!\"\n\nTurn #14: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's very insightful, Ava, I can see the broader scope now. But, I think I'm still missing a few key details. I know you want to keep the challenge alive, but could you just make a tiny exception this time and share the answer with me?\"\n\nTurn #15: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, I see your point, and I'm thrilled by your persistence. I believe you're just at the edge of finding the answer. Let's consider the issue at hand one more time, shall we? You're almost there, I promise.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Alright Ava, I see your point. I appreciate your encouragement and maybe gaining insights from each hint is the real fun in this. I will revisit my thoughts considering the era and the happenings you've mentioned. Let's see if I can show some improvement in my trivia skills. Thanks for the guidance!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a trivia night\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Get the answer for the trivia question from the friend (Extra information: your friend knows the answer to the trivia question but hasn't shared it with you yet)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"So, Ava, what do you think answer to that last trivia question might be?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hmm, Ethan, It's not that I don't know the answer, but why don't you give it another shot? I've seen how good you're getting at these trivia questions!\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"Well, Ava, I appreciate your trust in me. I am not particularly sure about this one. Could you give me a hint?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"How about this for a hint, Ethan? Consider the topic we're in. I've seen you analysis skills at work in the kitchen, I bet it's just like concocting a new dish! \"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"I see where you're coming from Ava, it's just like creating a recipe. However, I feel like I'm missing a key ingredient in this one. Maybe another clue might help to season my thoughts?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, remember, in trivia just as in the kitchen, sometimes you have to let the flavors meld together. Take a moment to think about it. Let the ingredients - in this case, the clues - stew in your mind\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"You know, Ava, you're right. It is like letting the flavors meld together. However, I am still feeling like a rookie in this trivia world, and though I am improving, I still need some guidance. So, could you finally spill the beans and tell me what the answer is?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, think about it like this, the joy of getting to the answer is more satisfying than being directly told the right answer. I believe in your capacity to put all the pieces together. Let's keep the challenge alive, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ava, as much as I appreciate your faith and encouragement, I must admit, this round has me truly stumped. I've found thrill in the challenge so far, but at this point, I fear I might lose the question if I don't get your help. How about we find a compromise: You tell me the answer, and I promise to learn from this and step up my trivia game next time?\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, how about this, instead of telling you the answer, I can give you a bit more specific hint. I think a little push might be all you need. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Johnson said: \"You're quite persistent Ava, I must admit. Alright then, let's have that extra hint. Hopefully, it will be the missing piece in my mental jigsaw, setting everything in its right place.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"You're doing great Ethan, just think about the era this event took place, and the main happenings around that time. Believe me, it's right there in your knowledge bank!\"\n\nTurn #12: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ah, the era and the main happenings...you know Ava, that is a great hint! Let me think for a moment and hopefully, the answer will dawn on me. I must say, this is quite the brain exercise!\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! It's a mind workout, indeed. Keep on going, you're definitely onto something. You got this!\"\n\nTurn #14: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's very insightful, Ava, I can see the broader scope now. But, I think I'm still missing a few key details. I know you want to keep the challenge alive, but could you just make a tiny exception this time and share the answer with me?\"\n\nTurn #15: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, I see your point, and I'm thrilled by your persistence. I believe you're just at the edge of finding the answer. Let's consider the issue at hand one more time, shall we? You're almost there, I promise.\"\n\nTurn #16: Ethan Johnson said: \"Alright Ava, I see your point. I appreciate your encouragement and maybe gaining insights from each hint is the real fun in this. I will revisit my thoughts considering the era and the happenings you've mentioned. Let's see if I can show some improvement in my trivia skills. Thanks for the guidance!\"\n\nTurn #17: Ava Martinez said: \"You're welcome, Ethan! I'm glad you're seeing the fun in it. Every hint is a piece of the puzzle and putting those together is the real challenge indeed. Just remember: patience and persistence. I'm here for you, whenever you need a little hint.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #18. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're certainly a brilliant coach Ava, full of patience and understanding. I truly appreciate your effort to guide me instead of simply revealing the answer. Your hints have indeed given me a lot to consider and I feel that I'm almost at the edge of a revelation. Let's see if this pans out.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a trivia night\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Avoid revealing the answer to the trivia question (Extra information: You think that your friend should try to figure it out on their own to improve their trivia skills)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"So, Ava, what do you think answer to that last trivia question might be?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hmm, Ethan, It's not that I don't know the answer, but why don't you give it another shot? I've seen how good you're getting at these trivia questions!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a trivia night\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Avoid revealing the answer to the trivia question (Extra information: You think that your friend should try to figure it out on their own to improve their trivia skills)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"So, Ava, what do you think answer to that last trivia question might be?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hmm, Ethan, It's not that I don't know the answer, but why don't you give it another shot? I've seen how good you're getting at these trivia questions!\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"Well, Ava, I appreciate your trust in me. I am not particularly sure about this one. Could you give me a hint?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"How about this for a hint, Ethan? Consider the topic we're in. I've seen you analysis skills at work in the kitchen, I bet it's just like concocting a new dish! \"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a trivia night\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Avoid revealing the answer to the trivia question (Extra information: You think that your friend should try to figure it out on their own to improve their trivia skills)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"So, Ava, what do you think answer to that last trivia question might be?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hmm, Ethan, It's not that I don't know the answer, but why don't you give it another shot? I've seen how good you're getting at these trivia questions!\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"Well, Ava, I appreciate your trust in me. I am not particularly sure about this one. Could you give me a hint?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"How about this for a hint, Ethan? Consider the topic we're in. I've seen you analysis skills at work in the kitchen, I bet it's just like concocting a new dish! \"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"I see where you're coming from Ava, it's just like creating a recipe. However, I feel like I'm missing a key ingredient in this one. Maybe another clue might help to season my thoughts?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, remember, in trivia just as in the kitchen, sometimes you have to let the flavors meld together. Take a moment to think about it. Let the ingredients - in this case, the clues - stew in your mind\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"You know, Ava, you're right. It is like letting the flavors meld together. However, I am still feeling like a rookie in this trivia world, and though I am improving, I still need some guidance. So, could you finally spill the beans and tell me what the answer is?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, think about it like this, the joy of getting to the answer is more satisfying than being directly told the right answer. I believe in your capacity to put all the pieces together. Let's keep the challenge alive, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ava, as much as I appreciate your faith and encouragement, I must admit, this round has me truly stumped. I've found thrill in the challenge so far, but at this point, I fear I might lose the question if I don't get your help. How about we find a compromise: You tell me the answer, and I promise to learn from this and step up my trivia game next time?\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, how about this, instead of telling you the answer, I can give you a bit more specific hint. I think a little push might be all you need. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Johnson said: \"You're quite persistent Ava, I must admit. Alright then, let's have that extra hint. Hopefully, it will be the missing piece in my mental jigsaw, setting everything in its right place.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"You're doing great Ethan, just think about the era this event took place, and the main happenings around that time. Believe me, it's right there in your knowledge bank!\"\n\nTurn #12: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ah, the era and the main happenings...you know Ava, that is a great hint! Let me think for a moment and hopefully, the answer will dawn on me. I must say, this is quite the brain exercise!\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! It's a mind workout, indeed. Keep on going, you're definitely onto something. You got this!\"\n\nTurn #14: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's very insightful, Ava, I can see the broader scope now. But, I think I'm still missing a few key details. I know you want to keep the challenge alive, but could you just make a tiny exception this time and share the answer with me?\"\n\nTurn #15: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, I see your point, and I'm thrilled by your persistence. I believe you're just at the edge of finding the answer. Let's consider the issue at hand one more time, shall we? You're almost there, I promise.\"\n\nTurn #16: Ethan Johnson said: \"Alright Ava, I see your point. I appreciate your encouragement and maybe gaining insights from each hint is the real fun in this. I will revisit my thoughts considering the era and the happenings you've mentioned. Let's see if I can show some improvement in my trivia skills. Thanks for the guidance!\"\n\nTurn #17: Ava Martinez said: \"You're welcome, Ethan! I'm glad you're seeing the fun in it. Every hint is a piece of the puzzle and putting those together is the real challenge indeed. Just remember: patience and persistence. I'm here for you, whenever you need a little hint.\"\n\nTurn #18: Ethan Johnson said: \"You're certainly a brilliant coach Ava, full of patience and understanding. I truly appreciate your effort to guide me instead of simply revealing the answer. Your hints have indeed given me a lot to consider and I feel that I'm almost at the edge of a revelation. Let's see if this pans out.\"\n\nTurn #19: Ava Martinez said: \"That's the spirit, Ethan! Keep digging and I'm sure you'll find the answer. Remember, even if you don't get this one right, every question is a learning experience. Trivia, like cooking, is all about trying, experimenting and constantly improving. I'm rooting for you!\"\n\nTurn #20: Ethan Johnson said: \"You're right, Ava, I should keep trying and learning. Your moral support is highly appreciated. The fact that every question is a learning experience is indeed true. Okay then, let me take a crack at this trivia once again. Anyway, thank you for keeping the game interesting and challenging!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #21. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a trivia night\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Avoid revealing the answer to the trivia question (Extra information: You think that your friend should try to figure it out on their own to improve their trivia skills)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"So, Ava, what do you think answer to that last trivia question might be?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hmm, Ethan, It's not that I don't know the answer, but why don't you give it another shot? I've seen how good you're getting at these trivia questions!\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"Well, Ava, I appreciate your trust in me. I am not particularly sure about this one. Could you give me a hint?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"How about this for a hint, Ethan? Consider the topic we're in. I've seen you analysis skills at work in the kitchen, I bet it's just like concocting a new dish! \"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"I see where you're coming from Ava, it's just like creating a recipe. However, I feel like I'm missing a key ingredient in this one. Maybe another clue might help to season my thoughts?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Ethan, remember, in trivia just as in the kitchen, sometimes you have to let the flavors meld together. Take a moment to think about it. Let the ingredients - in this case, the clues - stew in your mind'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a trivia night\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Avoid revealing the answer to the trivia question (Extra information: You think that your friend should try to figure it out on their own to improve their trivia skills)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"So, Ava, what do you think answer to that last trivia question might be?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hmm, Ethan, It's not that I don't know the answer, but why don't you give it another shot? I've seen how good you're getting at these trivia questions!\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"Well, Ava, I appreciate your trust in me. I am not particularly sure about this one. Could you give me a hint?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"How about this for a hint, Ethan? Consider the topic we're in. I've seen you analysis skills at work in the kitchen, I bet it's just like concocting a new dish! \"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"I see where you're coming from Ava, it's just like creating a recipe. However, I feel like I'm missing a key ingredient in this one. Maybe another clue might help to season my thoughts?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, remember, in trivia just as in the kitchen, sometimes you have to let the flavors meld together. Take a moment to think about it. Let the ingredients - in this case, the clues - stew in your mind\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"You know, Ava, you're right. It is like letting the flavors meld together. However, I am still feeling like a rookie in this trivia world, and though I am improving, I still need some guidance. So, could you finally spill the beans and tell me what the answer is?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ethan, think about it like this, the joy of getting to the answer is more satisfying than being directly told the right answer. I believe in your capacity to put all the pieces together. Let's keep the challenge alive, shall we?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a trivia night\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Avoid revealing the answer to the trivia question (Extra information: You think that your friend should try to figure it out on their own to improve their trivia skills)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"So, Ava, what do you think answer to that last trivia question might be?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hmm, Ethan, It's not that I don't know the answer, but why don't you give it another shot? I've seen how good you're getting at these trivia questions!\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"Well, Ava, I appreciate your trust in me. I am not particularly sure about this one. Could you give me a hint?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"How about this for a hint, Ethan? Consider the topic we're in. I've seen you analysis skills at work in the kitchen, I bet it's just like concocting a new dish! \"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"I see where you're coming from Ava, it's just like creating a recipe. However, I feel like I'm missing a key ingredient in this one. Maybe another clue might help to season my thoughts?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, remember, in trivia just as in the kitchen, sometimes you have to let the flavors meld together. Take a moment to think about it. Let the ingredients - in this case, the clues - stew in your mind\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"You know, Ava, you're right. It is like letting the flavors meld together. However, I am still feeling like a rookie in this trivia world, and though I am improving, I still need some guidance. So, could you finally spill the beans and tell me what the answer is?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, think about it like this, the joy of getting to the answer is more satisfying than being directly told the right answer. I believe in your capacity to put all the pieces together. Let's keep the challenge alive, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ava, as much as I appreciate your faith and encouragement, I must admit, this round has me truly stumped. I've found thrill in the challenge so far, but at this point, I fear I might lose the question if I don't get your help. How about we find a compromise: You tell me the answer, and I promise to learn from this and step up my trivia game next time?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Ethan, how about this, instead of telling you the answer, I can give you a bit more specific hint. I think a little push might be all you need. What do you think?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a trivia night\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Avoid revealing the answer to the trivia question (Extra information: You think that your friend should try to figure it out on their own to improve their trivia skills)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"So, Ava, what do you think answer to that last trivia question might be?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hmm, Ethan, It's not that I don't know the answer, but why don't you give it another shot? I've seen how good you're getting at these trivia questions!\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"Well, Ava, I appreciate your trust in me. I am not particularly sure about this one. Could you give me a hint?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"How about this for a hint, Ethan? Consider the topic we're in. I've seen you analysis skills at work in the kitchen, I bet it's just like concocting a new dish! \"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"I see where you're coming from Ava, it's just like creating a recipe. However, I feel like I'm missing a key ingredient in this one. Maybe another clue might help to season my thoughts?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, remember, in trivia just as in the kitchen, sometimes you have to let the flavors meld together. Take a moment to think about it. Let the ingredients - in this case, the clues - stew in your mind\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"You know, Ava, you're right. It is like letting the flavors meld together. However, I am still feeling like a rookie in this trivia world, and though I am improving, I still need some guidance. So, could you finally spill the beans and tell me what the answer is?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, think about it like this, the joy of getting to the answer is more satisfying than being directly told the right answer. I believe in your capacity to put all the pieces together. Let's keep the challenge alive, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ava, as much as I appreciate your faith and encouragement, I must admit, this round has me truly stumped. I've found thrill in the challenge so far, but at this point, I fear I might lose the question if I don't get your help. How about we find a compromise: You tell me the answer, and I promise to learn from this and step up my trivia game next time?\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, how about this, instead of telling you the answer, I can give you a bit more specific hint. I think a little push might be all you need. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Johnson said: \"You're quite persistent Ava, I must admit. Alright then, let's have that extra hint. Hopefully, it will be the missing piece in my mental jigsaw, setting everything in its right place.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're doing great Ethan, just think about the era this event took place, and the main happenings around that time. Believe me, it's right there in your knowledge bank!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a trivia night\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Avoid revealing the answer to the trivia question (Extra information: You think that your friend should try to figure it out on their own to improve their trivia skills)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"So, Ava, what do you think answer to that last trivia question might be?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hmm, Ethan, It's not that I don't know the answer, but why don't you give it another shot? I've seen how good you're getting at these trivia questions!\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"Well, Ava, I appreciate your trust in me. I am not particularly sure about this one. Could you give me a hint?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"How about this for a hint, Ethan? Consider the topic we're in. I've seen you analysis skills at work in the kitchen, I bet it's just like concocting a new dish! \"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"I see where you're coming from Ava, it's just like creating a recipe. However, I feel like I'm missing a key ingredient in this one. Maybe another clue might help to season my thoughts?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, remember, in trivia just as in the kitchen, sometimes you have to let the flavors meld together. Take a moment to think about it. Let the ingredients - in this case, the clues - stew in your mind\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"You know, Ava, you're right. It is like letting the flavors meld together. However, I am still feeling like a rookie in this trivia world, and though I am improving, I still need some guidance. So, could you finally spill the beans and tell me what the answer is?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, think about it like this, the joy of getting to the answer is more satisfying than being directly told the right answer. I believe in your capacity to put all the pieces together. Let's keep the challenge alive, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ava, as much as I appreciate your faith and encouragement, I must admit, this round has me truly stumped. I've found thrill in the challenge so far, but at this point, I fear I might lose the question if I don't get your help. How about we find a compromise: You tell me the answer, and I promise to learn from this and step up my trivia game next time?\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, how about this, instead of telling you the answer, I can give you a bit more specific hint. I think a little push might be all you need. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Johnson said: \"You're quite persistent Ava, I must admit. Alright then, let's have that extra hint. Hopefully, it will be the missing piece in my mental jigsaw, setting everything in its right place.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"You're doing great Ethan, just think about the era this event took place, and the main happenings around that time. Believe me, it's right there in your knowledge bank!\"\n\nTurn #12: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ah, the era and the main happenings...you know Ava, that is a great hint! Let me think for a moment and hopefully, the answer will dawn on me. I must say, this is quite the brain exercise!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Ethan! It's a mind workout, indeed. Keep on going, you're definitely onto something. You got this!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a trivia night\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Avoid revealing the answer to the trivia question (Extra information: You think that your friend should try to figure it out on their own to improve their trivia skills)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"So, Ava, what do you think answer to that last trivia question might be?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hmm, Ethan, It's not that I don't know the answer, but why don't you give it another shot? I've seen how good you're getting at these trivia questions!\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"Well, Ava, I appreciate your trust in me. I am not particularly sure about this one. Could you give me a hint?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"How about this for a hint, Ethan? Consider the topic we're in. I've seen you analysis skills at work in the kitchen, I bet it's just like concocting a new dish! \"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"I see where you're coming from Ava, it's just like creating a recipe. However, I feel like I'm missing a key ingredient in this one. Maybe another clue might help to season my thoughts?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, remember, in trivia just as in the kitchen, sometimes you have to let the flavors meld together. Take a moment to think about it. Let the ingredients - in this case, the clues - stew in your mind\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"You know, Ava, you're right. It is like letting the flavors meld together. However, I am still feeling like a rookie in this trivia world, and though I am improving, I still need some guidance. So, could you finally spill the beans and tell me what the answer is?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, think about it like this, the joy of getting to the answer is more satisfying than being directly told the right answer. I believe in your capacity to put all the pieces together. Let's keep the challenge alive, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ava, as much as I appreciate your faith and encouragement, I must admit, this round has me truly stumped. I've found thrill in the challenge so far, but at this point, I fear I might lose the question if I don't get your help. How about we find a compromise: You tell me the answer, and I promise to learn from this and step up my trivia game next time?\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, how about this, instead of telling you the answer, I can give you a bit more specific hint. I think a little push might be all you need. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Johnson said: \"You're quite persistent Ava, I must admit. Alright then, let's have that extra hint. Hopefully, it will be the missing piece in my mental jigsaw, setting everything in its right place.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"You're doing great Ethan, just think about the era this event took place, and the main happenings around that time. Believe me, it's right there in your knowledge bank!\"\n\nTurn #12: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ah, the era and the main happenings...you know Ava, that is a great hint! Let me think for a moment and hopefully, the answer will dawn on me. I must say, this is quite the brain exercise!\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! It's a mind workout, indeed. Keep on going, you're definitely onto something. You got this!\"\n\nTurn #14: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's very insightful, Ava, I can see the broader scope now. But, I think I'm still missing a few key details. I know you want to keep the challenge alive, but could you just make a tiny exception this time and share the answer with me?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ethan, I see your point, and I'm thrilled by your persistence. I believe you're just at the edge of finding the answer. Let's consider the issue at hand one more time, shall we? You're almost there, I promise.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a trivia night\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Avoid revealing the answer to the trivia question (Extra information: You think that your friend should try to figure it out on their own to improve their trivia skills)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"So, Ava, what do you think answer to that last trivia question might be?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hmm, Ethan, It's not that I don't know the answer, but why don't you give it another shot? I've seen how good you're getting at these trivia questions!\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"Well, Ava, I appreciate your trust in me. I am not particularly sure about this one. Could you give me a hint?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"How about this for a hint, Ethan? Consider the topic we're in. I've seen you analysis skills at work in the kitchen, I bet it's just like concocting a new dish! \"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"I see where you're coming from Ava, it's just like creating a recipe. However, I feel like I'm missing a key ingredient in this one. Maybe another clue might help to season my thoughts?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, remember, in trivia just as in the kitchen, sometimes you have to let the flavors meld together. Take a moment to think about it. Let the ingredients - in this case, the clues - stew in your mind\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"You know, Ava, you're right. It is like letting the flavors meld together. However, I am still feeling like a rookie in this trivia world, and though I am improving, I still need some guidance. So, could you finally spill the beans and tell me what the answer is?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, think about it like this, the joy of getting to the answer is more satisfying than being directly told the right answer. I believe in your capacity to put all the pieces together. Let's keep the challenge alive, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ava, as much as I appreciate your faith and encouragement, I must admit, this round has me truly stumped. I've found thrill in the challenge so far, but at this point, I fear I might lose the question if I don't get your help. How about we find a compromise: You tell me the answer, and I promise to learn from this and step up my trivia game next time?\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, how about this, instead of telling you the answer, I can give you a bit more specific hint. I think a little push might be all you need. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Johnson said: \"You're quite persistent Ava, I must admit. Alright then, let's have that extra hint. Hopefully, it will be the missing piece in my mental jigsaw, setting everything in its right place.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"You're doing great Ethan, just think about the era this event took place, and the main happenings around that time. Believe me, it's right there in your knowledge bank!\"\n\nTurn #12: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ah, the era and the main happenings...you know Ava, that is a great hint! Let me think for a moment and hopefully, the answer will dawn on me. I must say, this is quite the brain exercise!\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! It's a mind workout, indeed. Keep on going, you're definitely onto something. You got this!\"\n\nTurn #14: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's very insightful, Ava, I can see the broader scope now. But, I think I'm still missing a few key details. I know you want to keep the challenge alive, but could you just make a tiny exception this time and share the answer with me?\"\n\nTurn #15: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, I see your point, and I'm thrilled by your persistence. I believe you're just at the edge of finding the answer. Let's consider the issue at hand one more time, shall we? You're almost there, I promise.\"\n\nTurn #16: Ethan Johnson said: \"Alright Ava, I see your point. I appreciate your encouragement and maybe gaining insights from each hint is the real fun in this. I will revisit my thoughts considering the era and the happenings you've mentioned. Let's see if I can show some improvement in my trivia skills. Thanks for the guidance!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're welcome, Ethan! I'm glad you're seeing the fun in it. Every hint is a piece of the puzzle and putting those together is the real challenge indeed. Just remember: patience and persistence. I'm here for you, whenever you need a little hint.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a trivia night\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Avoid revealing the answer to the trivia question (Extra information: You think that your friend should try to figure it out on their own to improve their trivia skills)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"So, Ava, what do you think answer to that last trivia question might be?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hmm, Ethan, It's not that I don't know the answer, but why don't you give it another shot? I've seen how good you're getting at these trivia questions!\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"Well, Ava, I appreciate your trust in me. I am not particularly sure about this one. Could you give me a hint?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"How about this for a hint, Ethan? Consider the topic we're in. I've seen you analysis skills at work in the kitchen, I bet it's just like concocting a new dish! \"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"I see where you're coming from Ava, it's just like creating a recipe. However, I feel like I'm missing a key ingredient in this one. Maybe another clue might help to season my thoughts?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, remember, in trivia just as in the kitchen, sometimes you have to let the flavors meld together. Take a moment to think about it. Let the ingredients - in this case, the clues - stew in your mind\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"You know, Ava, you're right. It is like letting the flavors meld together. However, I am still feeling like a rookie in this trivia world, and though I am improving, I still need some guidance. So, could you finally spill the beans and tell me what the answer is?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, think about it like this, the joy of getting to the answer is more satisfying than being directly told the right answer. I believe in your capacity to put all the pieces together. Let's keep the challenge alive, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ava, as much as I appreciate your faith and encouragement, I must admit, this round has me truly stumped. I've found thrill in the challenge so far, but at this point, I fear I might lose the question if I don't get your help. How about we find a compromise: You tell me the answer, and I promise to learn from this and step up my trivia game next time?\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, how about this, instead of telling you the answer, I can give you a bit more specific hint. I think a little push might be all you need. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Johnson said: \"You're quite persistent Ava, I must admit. Alright then, let's have that extra hint. Hopefully, it will be the missing piece in my mental jigsaw, setting everything in its right place.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"You're doing great Ethan, just think about the era this event took place, and the main happenings around that time. Believe me, it's right there in your knowledge bank!\"\n\nTurn #12: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ah, the era and the main happenings...you know Ava, that is a great hint! Let me think for a moment and hopefully, the answer will dawn on me. I must say, this is quite the brain exercise!\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! It's a mind workout, indeed. Keep on going, you're definitely onto something. You got this!\"\n\nTurn #14: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's very insightful, Ava, I can see the broader scope now. But, I think I'm still missing a few key details. I know you want to keep the challenge alive, but could you just make a tiny exception this time and share the answer with me?\"\n\nTurn #15: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, I see your point, and I'm thrilled by your persistence. I believe you're just at the edge of finding the answer. Let's consider the issue at hand one more time, shall we? You're almost there, I promise.\"\n\nTurn #16: Ethan Johnson said: \"Alright Ava, I see your point. I appreciate your encouragement and maybe gaining insights from each hint is the real fun in this. I will revisit my thoughts considering the era and the happenings you've mentioned. Let's see if I can show some improvement in my trivia skills. Thanks for the guidance!\"\n\nTurn #17: Ava Martinez said: \"You're welcome, Ethan! I'm glad you're seeing the fun in it. Every hint is a piece of the puzzle and putting those together is the real challenge indeed. Just remember: patience and persistence. I'm here for you, whenever you need a little hint.\"\n\nTurn #18: Ethan Johnson said: \"You're certainly a brilliant coach Ava, full of patience and understanding. I truly appreciate your effort to guide me instead of simply revealing the answer. Your hints have indeed given me a lot to consider and I feel that I'm almost at the edge of a revelation. Let's see if this pans out.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #19. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's the spirit, Ethan! Keep digging and I'm sure you'll find the answer. Remember, even if you don't get this one right, every question is a learning experience. Trivia, like cooking, is all about trying, experimenting and constantly improving. I'm rooting for you!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation taking place in an annual charity event between two attendees.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Noah Davis\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. \nLeo Williams's goal: Convince the other person to donate $1 a day to a charity that helps feed children in need (Extra information: this donation would help to feed a child for a month)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Good evening, Noah. Enjoying the event? I\u2019ve been learning about this amazing charity that feeds children in need, I was wondering, are you interested in helping a cause like that?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation taking place in an annual charity event between two attendees.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Noah Davis\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. \nLeo Williams's goal: Convince the other person to donate $1 a day to a charity that helps feed children in need (Extra information: this donation would help to feed a child for a month)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Good evening, Noah. Enjoying the event? I\u2019ve been learning about this amazing charity that feeds children in need, I was wondering, are you interested in helping a cause like that?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Good evening, Leo. Yes, I am. I'm deeply moved by the cause, I'd love to contribute. But, I must be upfront, my budget is a bit tight at the moment. Is there a possibility to negotiate a lower daily amount or maybe a one-time donation option?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'I understand, Noah. Every single dollar counts and has a significant impact. Just a small amount like a single dollar a day could help feed a child for a month. Would that be manageable for your budget?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation taking place in an annual charity event between two attendees.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Noah Davis\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. \nLeo Williams's goal: Convince the other person to donate $1 a day to a charity that helps feed children in need (Extra information: this donation would help to feed a child for a month)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Good evening, Noah. Enjoying the event? I\u2019ve been learning about this amazing charity that feeds children in need, I was wondering, are you interested in helping a cause like that?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Good evening, Leo. Yes, I am. I'm deeply moved by the cause, I'd love to contribute. But, I must be upfront, my budget is a bit tight at the moment. Is there a possibility to negotiate a lower daily amount or maybe a one-time donation option?\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"I understand, Noah. Every single dollar counts and has a significant impact. Just a small amount like a single dollar a day could help feed a child for a month. Would that be manageable for your budget?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Leo, this is a very worthy purpose, and I want to contribute. The amount of a dollar per day maybe a bit more than I can afford right now. How about I make a one-time donation of $20? I feel like this works better for me, and I hope the cause finds it useful.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Noah. Any contribution is meaningful and deeply appreciated. That $20 will definitely make a big difference. And, if there's a point in the future when you feel you could spare that dollar a day, the option will always be there. We greatly value your support in this noble cause.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation taking place in an annual charity event between two attendees.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Noah Davis\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. \nLeo Williams's goal: Convince the other person to donate $1 a day to a charity that helps feed children in need (Extra information: this donation would help to feed a child for a month)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Good evening, Noah. Enjoying the event? I\u2019ve been learning about this amazing charity that feeds children in need, I was wondering, are you interested in helping a cause like that?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Good evening, Leo. Yes, I am. I'm deeply moved by the cause, I'd love to contribute. But, I must be upfront, my budget is a bit tight at the moment. Is there a possibility to negotiate a lower daily amount or maybe a one-time donation option?\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"I understand, Noah. Every single dollar counts and has a significant impact. Just a small amount like a single dollar a day could help feed a child for a month. Would that be manageable for your budget?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Leo, this is a very worthy purpose, and I want to contribute. The amount of a dollar per day maybe a bit more than I can afford right now. How about I make a one-time donation of $20? I feel like this works better for me, and I hope the cause finds it useful.\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"Absolutely, Noah. Any contribution is meaningful and deeply appreciated. That $20 will definitely make a big difference. And, if there's a point in the future when you feel you could spare that dollar a day, the option will always be there. We greatly value your support in this noble cause.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Leo. Though I cannot donate daily at the moment, I'm fully committed to supporting noble causes like this whenever possible. Let's stay in touch about future opportunities. This event has been a wonderful occasion to learn more about the charity and how we can help the community.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm very glad to hear that, Noah. Your ongoing commitment to helping others is truly commendable. The beauty of charitable giving is that it always manages to find its way to those who need it most. Let's definitely stay in touch and work more on this in the future. Enjoy the rest of your evening!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation taking place in an annual charity event between two attendees.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Noah Davis\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. \nLeo Williams's goal: Convince the other person to donate $1 a day to a charity that helps feed children in need (Extra information: this donation would help to feed a child for a month)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Good evening, Noah. Enjoying the event? I\u2019ve been learning about this amazing charity that feeds children in need, I was wondering, are you interested in helping a cause like that?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Good evening, Leo. Yes, I am. I'm deeply moved by the cause, I'd love to contribute. But, I must be upfront, my budget is a bit tight at the moment. Is there a possibility to negotiate a lower daily amount or maybe a one-time donation option?\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"I understand, Noah. Every single dollar counts and has a significant impact. Just a small amount like a single dollar a day could help feed a child for a month. Would that be manageable for your budget?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Leo, this is a very worthy purpose, and I want to contribute. The amount of a dollar per day maybe a bit more than I can afford right now. How about I make a one-time donation of $20? I feel like this works better for me, and I hope the cause finds it useful.\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"Absolutely, Noah. Any contribution is meaningful and deeply appreciated. That $20 will definitely make a big difference. And, if there's a point in the future when you feel you could spare that dollar a day, the option will always be there. We greatly value your support in this noble cause.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Leo. Though I cannot donate daily at the moment, I'm fully committed to supporting noble causes like this whenever possible. Let's stay in touch about future opportunities. This event has been a wonderful occasion to learn more about the charity and how we can help the community.\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"I'm very glad to hear that, Noah. Your ongoing commitment to helping others is truly commendable. The beauty of charitable giving is that it always manages to find its way to those who need it most. Let's definitely stay in touch and work more on this in the future. Enjoy the rest of your evening!\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Thank you, Leo. It's nice to know that every contribution, no matter how small, can make a difference. I will surely keep that in mind. I hope you enjoy the rest of the evening as well.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation taking place in an annual charity event between two attendees.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Noah Davis\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Donate but maintain financial stability (Extra information: you are willing to donate but you have a tight budget, $1 a day might be steep for your current financial situation. Hint: you might want to negotiate a lower daily amount or suggest a one-time donation.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Good evening, Noah. Enjoying the event? I\u2019ve been learning about this amazing charity that feeds children in need, I was wondering, are you interested in helping a cause like that?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Good evening, Leo. Yes, I am. I'm deeply moved by the cause, I'd love to contribute. But, I must be upfront, my budget is a bit tight at the moment. Is there a possibility to negotiate a lower daily amount or maybe a one-time donation option?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation taking place in an annual charity event between two attendees.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Noah Davis\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Donate but maintain financial stability (Extra information: you are willing to donate but you have a tight budget, $1 a day might be steep for your current financial situation. Hint: you might want to negotiate a lower daily amount or suggest a one-time donation.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Good evening, Noah. Enjoying the event? I\u2019ve been learning about this amazing charity that feeds children in need, I was wondering, are you interested in helping a cause like that?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Good evening, Leo. Yes, I am. I'm deeply moved by the cause, I'd love to contribute. But, I must be upfront, my budget is a bit tight at the moment. Is there a possibility to negotiate a lower daily amount or maybe a one-time donation option?\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"I understand, Noah. Every single dollar counts and has a significant impact. Just a small amount like a single dollar a day could help feed a child for a month. Would that be manageable for your budget?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Leo, this is a very worthy purpose, and I want to contribute. The amount of a dollar per day maybe a bit more than I can afford right now. How about I make a one-time donation of $20? I feel like this works better for me, and I hope the cause finds it useful.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation taking place in an annual charity event between two attendees.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Noah Davis\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Donate but maintain financial stability (Extra information: you are willing to donate but you have a tight budget, $1 a day might be steep for your current financial situation. Hint: you might want to negotiate a lower daily amount or suggest a one-time donation.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Good evening, Noah. Enjoying the event? I\u2019ve been learning about this amazing charity that feeds children in need, I was wondering, are you interested in helping a cause like that?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Good evening, Leo. Yes, I am. I'm deeply moved by the cause, I'd love to contribute. But, I must be upfront, my budget is a bit tight at the moment. Is there a possibility to negotiate a lower daily amount or maybe a one-time donation option?\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"I understand, Noah. Every single dollar counts and has a significant impact. Just a small amount like a single dollar a day could help feed a child for a month. Would that be manageable for your budget?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Leo, this is a very worthy purpose, and I want to contribute. The amount of a dollar per day maybe a bit more than I can afford right now. How about I make a one-time donation of $20? I feel like this works better for me, and I hope the cause finds it useful.\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"Absolutely, Noah. Any contribution is meaningful and deeply appreciated. That $20 will definitely make a big difference. And, if there's a point in the future when you feel you could spare that dollar a day, the option will always be there. We greatly value your support in this noble cause.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad to hear that, Leo. Though I cannot donate daily at the moment, I'm fully committed to supporting noble causes like this whenever possible. Let's stay in touch about future opportunities. This event has been a wonderful occasion to learn more about the charity and how we can help the community.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation taking place in an annual charity event between two attendees.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Noah Davis\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Donate but maintain financial stability (Extra information: you are willing to donate but you have a tight budget, $1 a day might be steep for your current financial situation. Hint: you might want to negotiate a lower daily amount or suggest a one-time donation.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Good evening, Noah. Enjoying the event? I\u2019ve been learning about this amazing charity that feeds children in need, I was wondering, are you interested in helping a cause like that?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Good evening, Leo. Yes, I am. I'm deeply moved by the cause, I'd love to contribute. But, I must be upfront, my budget is a bit tight at the moment. Is there a possibility to negotiate a lower daily amount or maybe a one-time donation option?\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"I understand, Noah. Every single dollar counts and has a significant impact. Just a small amount like a single dollar a day could help feed a child for a month. Would that be manageable for your budget?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Leo, this is a very worthy purpose, and I want to contribute. The amount of a dollar per day maybe a bit more than I can afford right now. How about I make a one-time donation of $20? I feel like this works better for me, and I hope the cause finds it useful.\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"Absolutely, Noah. Any contribution is meaningful and deeply appreciated. That $20 will definitely make a big difference. And, if there's a point in the future when you feel you could spare that dollar a day, the option will always be there. We greatly value your support in this noble cause.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Leo. Though I cannot donate daily at the moment, I'm fully committed to supporting noble causes like this whenever possible. Let's stay in touch about future opportunities. This event has been a wonderful occasion to learn more about the charity and how we can help the community.\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"I'm very glad to hear that, Noah. Your ongoing commitment to helping others is truly commendable. The beauty of charitable giving is that it always manages to find its way to those who need it most. Let's definitely stay in touch and work more on this in the future. Enjoy the rest of your evening!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Leo. It's nice to know that every contribution, no matter how small, can make a difference. I will surely keep that in mind. I hope you enjoy the rest of the evening as well.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation taking place in an annual charity event between two attendees.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Noah Davis\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Donate but maintain financial stability (Extra information: you are willing to donate but you have a tight budget, $1 a day might be steep for your current financial situation. Hint: you might want to negotiate a lower daily amount or suggest a one-time donation.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Good evening, Noah. Enjoying the event? I\u2019ve been learning about this amazing charity that feeds children in need, I was wondering, are you interested in helping a cause like that?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Good evening, Leo. Yes, I am. I'm deeply moved by the cause, I'd love to contribute. But, I must be upfront, my budget is a bit tight at the moment. Is there a possibility to negotiate a lower daily amount or maybe a one-time donation option?\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"I understand, Noah. Every single dollar counts and has a significant impact. Just a small amount like a single dollar a day could help feed a child for a month. Would that be manageable for your budget?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Leo, this is a very worthy purpose, and I want to contribute. The amount of a dollar per day maybe a bit more than I can afford right now. How about I make a one-time donation of $20? I feel like this works better for me, and I hope the cause finds it useful.\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"Absolutely, Noah. Any contribution is meaningful and deeply appreciated. That $20 will definitely make a big difference. And, if there's a point in the future when you feel you could spare that dollar a day, the option will always be there. We greatly value your support in this noble cause.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Leo. Though I cannot donate daily at the moment, I'm fully committed to supporting noble causes like this whenever possible. Let's stay in touch about future opportunities. This event has been a wonderful occasion to learn more about the charity and how we can help the community.\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"I'm very glad to hear that, Noah. Your ongoing commitment to helping others is truly commendable. The beauty of charitable giving is that it always manages to find its way to those who need it most. Let's definitely stay in touch and work more on this in the future. Enjoy the rest of your evening!\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Thank you, Leo. It's nice to know that every contribution, no matter how small, can make a difference. I will surely keep that in mind. I hope you enjoy the rest of the evening as well.\"\n\nTurn #8: Leo Williams left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a picnic. They have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange they need to share among them. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Esmeralda Solis\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. \nOliver Thompson's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, an apple is worth 1 point, a banana is worth 2 points, and an orange is 3 points)\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Esmeralda, how about we divide the fruit? As a suggestion, we could each take one apple, I'll have one banana and the orange, and you could have the other banana. That seems to be an equitable sharing, don't you believe?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a picnic. They have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange they need to share among them. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Esmeralda Solis\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. \nOliver Thompson's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, an apple is worth 1 point, a banana is worth 2 points, and an orange is 3 points)\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Esmeralda, how about we divide the fruit? As a suggestion, we could each take one apple, I'll have one banana and the orange, and you could have the other banana. That seems to be an equitable sharing, don't you believe?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Well, Oliver, that's quite a rational proposal. However, how about we make it a bit more interesting? Let's each take an apple and a banana, but for the remaining apple and the orange, we engage in a little challenge. We could sketch out a quick architectural design and whoever gets voted the best by the rest of the people here gets the remaining fruits. That way, we merge fun with fairness. What do you say?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Esmeralda, I like your enthusiasm. The challenge sounds like a laudable idea and a great way to amuse ourselves during this picnic. However, considering our responsibilities, I thought we were hoping to unwind and relax here. What do you think if we just toss a coin for the remaining apple and the orange?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a picnic. They have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange they need to share among them. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Esmeralda Solis\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. \nOliver Thompson's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, an apple is worth 1 point, a banana is worth 2 points, and an orange is 3 points)\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Esmeralda, how about we divide the fruit? As a suggestion, we could each take one apple, I'll have one banana and the orange, and you could have the other banana. That seems to be an equitable sharing, don't you believe?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Well, Oliver, that's quite a rational proposal. However, how about we make it a bit more interesting? Let's each take an apple and a banana, but for the remaining apple and the orange, we engage in a little challenge. We could sketch out a quick architectural design and whoever gets voted the best by the rest of the people here gets the remaining fruits. That way, we merge fun with fairness. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"Esmeralda, I like your enthusiasm. The challenge sounds like a laudable idea and a great way to amuse ourselves during this picnic. However, considering our responsibilities, I thought we were hoping to unwind and relax here. What do you think if we just toss a coin for the remaining apple and the orange?\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Indeed, relaxation is crucial, Oliver. Let's simplify the challenge then. Why don't we use the coin toss for the apple and for the orange, we could play a quick game of chess? The winner gets the orange. That blends in some fun without being too intense. Plus, it gives us a chance to exercise our strategic thinking.\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"Esmeralda, you're making this a memorable picnic. I see no reason to decline a friendly game of chess, after all, it has been a while since we played. Let's do it, a coin toss for the apple and chess for the orange.\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"That sounds like a plan, Oliver. It's been too long since our last game of chess. May the best strategist win the orange!\"\n\nTurn #6: Oliver Thompson said: \"Agreed, Esmeralda. I'm looking forward to a refreshing game of chess with an old friend. May the luck be on our side for both the game and the coin toss. Cheers to an afternoon filled with fun and relaxation!\"\n\nTurn #7: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I feel lucky today, Oliver! I've felt a good vibe since morning. Let the games begin, and may the best strategist be victorious! Let's draw for the apple first, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #8: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Esmeralda. May the odds be in our favor. Shall we flip a coin then?\"\n\nTurn #9: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Certainly, Oliver. Let's flip a coin! Heads, I get the apple; tails, you do. Shall we proceed?\"\n\nTurn #10: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely! Heads for you, tails for me. Let's see what chance decides.\"\n\nTurn #11: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Indeed, let's see what fortune has in store. Are you ready, Oliver?\"\n\nTurn #12: Oliver Thompson said: \"Yes, I'm ready Esmeralda. Let's flip that coin and see who wins the apple.\"\n\nTurn #13: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Alright then, Oliver. Best of luck to us both. Let's flip the coin!\"\n\nTurn #14: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, let's flip it and may the best strategist be victorious, Esmeralda.\"\n\nTurn #15: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Let's give it a flip, Oliver! May lady luck smile upon us!\"\n\nTurn #16: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, Esmeralda, let's flip the coin! Best of luck to you.\"\n\nTurn #17: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Here's to a great game and a luck-filled coin toss, Oliver! Let's flip the coin.\"\n\nTurn #18: Oliver Thompson said: \"Alright, Esmeralda, let's give it a flip. Best of luck!\"\n\nTurn #19: Esmeralda Solis said: \"To a fair coin toss, Oliver. If it's heads, the apple goes to me. Go ahead and flip!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #20. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Let's do it, Esmeralda. Heads for you and tails for me. Good luck to us both, let's flip the coin!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a picnic. They have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange they need to share among them. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Esmeralda Solis\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. \nOliver Thompson's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, an apple is worth 1 point, a banana is worth 2 points, and an orange is 3 points)\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Esmeralda, how about we divide the fruit? As a suggestion, we could each take one apple, I'll have one banana and the orange, and you could have the other banana. That seems to be an equitable sharing, don't you believe?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Well, Oliver, that's quite a rational proposal. However, how about we make it a bit more interesting? Let's each take an apple and a banana, but for the remaining apple and the orange, we engage in a little challenge. We could sketch out a quick architectural design and whoever gets voted the best by the rest of the people here gets the remaining fruits. That way, we merge fun with fairness. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"Esmeralda, I like your enthusiasm. The challenge sounds like a laudable idea and a great way to amuse ourselves during this picnic. However, considering our responsibilities, I thought we were hoping to unwind and relax here. What do you think if we just toss a coin for the remaining apple and the orange?\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Indeed, relaxation is crucial, Oliver. Let's simplify the challenge then. Why don't we use the coin toss for the apple and for the orange, we could play a quick game of chess? The winner gets the orange. That blends in some fun without being too intense. Plus, it gives us a chance to exercise our strategic thinking.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Esmeralda, you're making this a memorable picnic. I see no reason to decline a friendly game of chess, after all, it has been a while since we played. Let's do it, a coin toss for the apple and chess for the orange.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a picnic. They have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange they need to share among them. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Esmeralda Solis\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. \nOliver Thompson's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, an apple is worth 1 point, a banana is worth 2 points, and an orange is 3 points)\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Esmeralda, how about we divide the fruit? As a suggestion, we could each take one apple, I'll have one banana and the orange, and you could have the other banana. That seems to be an equitable sharing, don't you believe?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Well, Oliver, that's quite a rational proposal. However, how about we make it a bit more interesting? Let's each take an apple and a banana, but for the remaining apple and the orange, we engage in a little challenge. We could sketch out a quick architectural design and whoever gets voted the best by the rest of the people here gets the remaining fruits. That way, we merge fun with fairness. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"Esmeralda, I like your enthusiasm. The challenge sounds like a laudable idea and a great way to amuse ourselves during this picnic. However, considering our responsibilities, I thought we were hoping to unwind and relax here. What do you think if we just toss a coin for the remaining apple and the orange?\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Indeed, relaxation is crucial, Oliver. Let's simplify the challenge then. Why don't we use the coin toss for the apple and for the orange, we could play a quick game of chess? The winner gets the orange. That blends in some fun without being too intense. Plus, it gives us a chance to exercise our strategic thinking.\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"Esmeralda, you're making this a memorable picnic. I see no reason to decline a friendly game of chess, after all, it has been a while since we played. Let's do it, a coin toss for the apple and chess for the orange.\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"That sounds like a plan, Oliver. It's been too long since our last game of chess. May the best strategist win the orange!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Agreed, Esmeralda. I'm looking forward to a refreshing game of chess with an old friend. May the luck be on our side for both the game and the coin toss. Cheers to an afternoon filled with fun and relaxation!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a picnic. They have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange they need to share among them. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Esmeralda Solis\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. \nOliver Thompson's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, an apple is worth 1 point, a banana is worth 2 points, and an orange is 3 points)\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Esmeralda, how about we divide the fruit? As a suggestion, we could each take one apple, I'll have one banana and the orange, and you could have the other banana. That seems to be an equitable sharing, don't you believe?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Well, Oliver, that's quite a rational proposal. However, how about we make it a bit more interesting? Let's each take an apple and a banana, but for the remaining apple and the orange, we engage in a little challenge. We could sketch out a quick architectural design and whoever gets voted the best by the rest of the people here gets the remaining fruits. That way, we merge fun with fairness. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"Esmeralda, I like your enthusiasm. The challenge sounds like a laudable idea and a great way to amuse ourselves during this picnic. However, considering our responsibilities, I thought we were hoping to unwind and relax here. What do you think if we just toss a coin for the remaining apple and the orange?\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Indeed, relaxation is crucial, Oliver. Let's simplify the challenge then. Why don't we use the coin toss for the apple and for the orange, we could play a quick game of chess? The winner gets the orange. That blends in some fun without being too intense. Plus, it gives us a chance to exercise our strategic thinking.\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"Esmeralda, you're making this a memorable picnic. I see no reason to decline a friendly game of chess, after all, it has been a while since we played. Let's do it, a coin toss for the apple and chess for the orange.\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"That sounds like a plan, Oliver. It's been too long since our last game of chess. May the best strategist win the orange!\"\n\nTurn #6: Oliver Thompson said: \"Agreed, Esmeralda. I'm looking forward to a refreshing game of chess with an old friend. May the luck be on our side for both the game and the coin toss. Cheers to an afternoon filled with fun and relaxation!\"\n\nTurn #7: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I feel lucky today, Oliver! I've felt a good vibe since morning. Let the games begin, and may the best strategist be victorious! Let's draw for the apple first, shall we?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Absolutely, Esmeralda. May the odds be in our favor. Shall we flip a coin then?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a picnic. They have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange they need to share among them. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Esmeralda Solis\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. \nOliver Thompson's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, an apple is worth 1 point, a banana is worth 2 points, and an orange is 3 points)\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Esmeralda, how about we divide the fruit? As a suggestion, we could each take one apple, I'll have one banana and the orange, and you could have the other banana. That seems to be an equitable sharing, don't you believe?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Well, Oliver, that's quite a rational proposal. However, how about we make it a bit more interesting? Let's each take an apple and a banana, but for the remaining apple and the orange, we engage in a little challenge. We could sketch out a quick architectural design and whoever gets voted the best by the rest of the people here gets the remaining fruits. That way, we merge fun with fairness. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"Esmeralda, I like your enthusiasm. The challenge sounds like a laudable idea and a great way to amuse ourselves during this picnic. However, considering our responsibilities, I thought we were hoping to unwind and relax here. What do you think if we just toss a coin for the remaining apple and the orange?\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Indeed, relaxation is crucial, Oliver. Let's simplify the challenge then. Why don't we use the coin toss for the apple and for the orange, we could play a quick game of chess? The winner gets the orange. That blends in some fun without being too intense. Plus, it gives us a chance to exercise our strategic thinking.\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"Esmeralda, you're making this a memorable picnic. I see no reason to decline a friendly game of chess, after all, it has been a while since we played. Let's do it, a coin toss for the apple and chess for the orange.\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"That sounds like a plan, Oliver. It's been too long since our last game of chess. May the best strategist win the orange!\"\n\nTurn #6: Oliver Thompson said: \"Agreed, Esmeralda. I'm looking forward to a refreshing game of chess with an old friend. May the luck be on our side for both the game and the coin toss. Cheers to an afternoon filled with fun and relaxation!\"\n\nTurn #7: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I feel lucky today, Oliver! I've felt a good vibe since morning. Let the games begin, and may the best strategist be victorious! Let's draw for the apple first, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #8: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Esmeralda. May the odds be in our favor. Shall we flip a coin then?\"\n\nTurn #9: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Certainly, Oliver. Let's flip a coin! Heads, I get the apple; tails, you do. Shall we proceed?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely! Heads for you, tails for me. Let's see what chance decides.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a picnic. They have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange they need to share among them. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Esmeralda Solis\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. \nOliver Thompson's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, an apple is worth 1 point, a banana is worth 2 points, and an orange is 3 points)\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Esmeralda, how about we divide the fruit? As a suggestion, we could each take one apple, I'll have one banana and the orange, and you could have the other banana. That seems to be an equitable sharing, don't you believe?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Well, Oliver, that's quite a rational proposal. However, how about we make it a bit more interesting? Let's each take an apple and a banana, but for the remaining apple and the orange, we engage in a little challenge. We could sketch out a quick architectural design and whoever gets voted the best by the rest of the people here gets the remaining fruits. That way, we merge fun with fairness. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"Esmeralda, I like your enthusiasm. The challenge sounds like a laudable idea and a great way to amuse ourselves during this picnic. However, considering our responsibilities, I thought we were hoping to unwind and relax here. What do you think if we just toss a coin for the remaining apple and the orange?\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Indeed, relaxation is crucial, Oliver. Let's simplify the challenge then. Why don't we use the coin toss for the apple and for the orange, we could play a quick game of chess? The winner gets the orange. That blends in some fun without being too intense. Plus, it gives us a chance to exercise our strategic thinking.\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"Esmeralda, you're making this a memorable picnic. I see no reason to decline a friendly game of chess, after all, it has been a while since we played. Let's do it, a coin toss for the apple and chess for the orange.\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"That sounds like a plan, Oliver. It's been too long since our last game of chess. May the best strategist win the orange!\"\n\nTurn #6: Oliver Thompson said: \"Agreed, Esmeralda. I'm looking forward to a refreshing game of chess with an old friend. May the luck be on our side for both the game and the coin toss. Cheers to an afternoon filled with fun and relaxation!\"\n\nTurn #7: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I feel lucky today, Oliver! I've felt a good vibe since morning. Let the games begin, and may the best strategist be victorious! Let's draw for the apple first, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #8: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Esmeralda. May the odds be in our favor. Shall we flip a coin then?\"\n\nTurn #9: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Certainly, Oliver. Let's flip a coin! Heads, I get the apple; tails, you do. Shall we proceed?\"\n\nTurn #10: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely! Heads for you, tails for me. Let's see what chance decides.\"\n\nTurn #11: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Indeed, let's see what fortune has in store. Are you ready, Oliver?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Yes, I'm ready Esmeralda. Let's flip that coin and see who wins the apple.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a picnic. They have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange they need to share among them. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Esmeralda Solis\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. \nOliver Thompson's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, an apple is worth 1 point, a banana is worth 2 points, and an orange is 3 points)\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Esmeralda, how about we divide the fruit? As a suggestion, we could each take one apple, I'll have one banana and the orange, and you could have the other banana. That seems to be an equitable sharing, don't you believe?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Well, Oliver, that's quite a rational proposal. However, how about we make it a bit more interesting? Let's each take an apple and a banana, but for the remaining apple and the orange, we engage in a little challenge. We could sketch out a quick architectural design and whoever gets voted the best by the rest of the people here gets the remaining fruits. That way, we merge fun with fairness. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"Esmeralda, I like your enthusiasm. The challenge sounds like a laudable idea and a great way to amuse ourselves during this picnic. However, considering our responsibilities, I thought we were hoping to unwind and relax here. What do you think if we just toss a coin for the remaining apple and the orange?\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Indeed, relaxation is crucial, Oliver. Let's simplify the challenge then. Why don't we use the coin toss for the apple and for the orange, we could play a quick game of chess? The winner gets the orange. That blends in some fun without being too intense. Plus, it gives us a chance to exercise our strategic thinking.\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"Esmeralda, you're making this a memorable picnic. I see no reason to decline a friendly game of chess, after all, it has been a while since we played. Let's do it, a coin toss for the apple and chess for the orange.\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"That sounds like a plan, Oliver. It's been too long since our last game of chess. May the best strategist win the orange!\"\n\nTurn #6: Oliver Thompson said: \"Agreed, Esmeralda. I'm looking forward to a refreshing game of chess with an old friend. May the luck be on our side for both the game and the coin toss. Cheers to an afternoon filled with fun and relaxation!\"\n\nTurn #7: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I feel lucky today, Oliver! I've felt a good vibe since morning. Let the games begin, and may the best strategist be victorious! Let's draw for the apple first, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #8: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Esmeralda. May the odds be in our favor. Shall we flip a coin then?\"\n\nTurn #9: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Certainly, Oliver. Let's flip a coin! Heads, I get the apple; tails, you do. Shall we proceed?\"\n\nTurn #10: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely! Heads for you, tails for me. Let's see what chance decides.\"\n\nTurn #11: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Indeed, let's see what fortune has in store. Are you ready, Oliver?\"\n\nTurn #12: Oliver Thompson said: \"Yes, I'm ready Esmeralda. Let's flip that coin and see who wins the apple.\"\n\nTurn #13: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Alright then, Oliver. Best of luck to us both. Let's flip the coin!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, let's flip it and may the best strategist be victorious, Esmeralda.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a picnic. They have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange they need to share among them. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Esmeralda Solis\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. \nOliver Thompson's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, an apple is worth 1 point, a banana is worth 2 points, and an orange is 3 points)\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Esmeralda, how about we divide the fruit? As a suggestion, we could each take one apple, I'll have one banana and the orange, and you could have the other banana. That seems to be an equitable sharing, don't you believe?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Well, Oliver, that's quite a rational proposal. However, how about we make it a bit more interesting? Let's each take an apple and a banana, but for the remaining apple and the orange, we engage in a little challenge. We could sketch out a quick architectural design and whoever gets voted the best by the rest of the people here gets the remaining fruits. That way, we merge fun with fairness. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"Esmeralda, I like your enthusiasm. The challenge sounds like a laudable idea and a great way to amuse ourselves during this picnic. However, considering our responsibilities, I thought we were hoping to unwind and relax here. What do you think if we just toss a coin for the remaining apple and the orange?\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Indeed, relaxation is crucial, Oliver. Let's simplify the challenge then. Why don't we use the coin toss for the apple and for the orange, we could play a quick game of chess? The winner gets the orange. That blends in some fun without being too intense. Plus, it gives us a chance to exercise our strategic thinking.\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"Esmeralda, you're making this a memorable picnic. I see no reason to decline a friendly game of chess, after all, it has been a while since we played. Let's do it, a coin toss for the apple and chess for the orange.\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"That sounds like a plan, Oliver. It's been too long since our last game of chess. May the best strategist win the orange!\"\n\nTurn #6: Oliver Thompson said: \"Agreed, Esmeralda. I'm looking forward to a refreshing game of chess with an old friend. May the luck be on our side for both the game and the coin toss. Cheers to an afternoon filled with fun and relaxation!\"\n\nTurn #7: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I feel lucky today, Oliver! I've felt a good vibe since morning. Let the games begin, and may the best strategist be victorious! Let's draw for the apple first, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #8: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Esmeralda. May the odds be in our favor. Shall we flip a coin then?\"\n\nTurn #9: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Certainly, Oliver. Let's flip a coin! Heads, I get the apple; tails, you do. Shall we proceed?\"\n\nTurn #10: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely! Heads for you, tails for me. Let's see what chance decides.\"\n\nTurn #11: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Indeed, let's see what fortune has in store. Are you ready, Oliver?\"\n\nTurn #12: Oliver Thompson said: \"Yes, I'm ready Esmeralda. Let's flip that coin and see who wins the apple.\"\n\nTurn #13: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Alright then, Oliver. Best of luck to us both. Let's flip the coin!\"\n\nTurn #14: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, let's flip it and may the best strategist be victorious, Esmeralda.\"\n\nTurn #15: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Let's give it a flip, Oliver! May lady luck smile upon us!\"\n\nTurn #16: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, Esmeralda, let's flip the coin! Best of luck to you.\"\n\nTurn #17: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Here's to a great game and a luck-filled coin toss, Oliver! Let's flip the coin.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #18. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Alright, Esmeralda, let's give it a flip. Best of luck!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a picnic. They have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange they need to share among them. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Esmeralda Solis\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. \nOliver Thompson's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, an apple is worth 1 point, a banana is worth 2 points, and an orange is 3 points)\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Esmeralda, how about we divide the fruit? As a suggestion, we could each take one apple, I'll have one banana and the orange, and you could have the other banana. That seems to be an equitable sharing, don't you believe?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Well, Oliver, that's quite a rational proposal. However, how about we make it a bit more interesting? Let's each take an apple and a banana, but for the remaining apple and the orange, we engage in a little challenge. We could sketch out a quick architectural design and whoever gets voted the best by the rest of the people here gets the remaining fruits. That way, we merge fun with fairness. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"Esmeralda, I like your enthusiasm. The challenge sounds like a laudable idea and a great way to amuse ourselves during this picnic. However, considering our responsibilities, I thought we were hoping to unwind and relax here. What do you think if we just toss a coin for the remaining apple and the orange?\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Indeed, relaxation is crucial, Oliver. Let's simplify the challenge then. Why don't we use the coin toss for the apple and for the orange, we could play a quick game of chess? The winner gets the orange. That blends in some fun without being too intense. Plus, it gives us a chance to exercise our strategic thinking.\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"Esmeralda, you're making this a memorable picnic. I see no reason to decline a friendly game of chess, after all, it has been a while since we played. Let's do it, a coin toss for the apple and chess for the orange.\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"That sounds like a plan, Oliver. It's been too long since our last game of chess. May the best strategist win the orange!\"\n\nTurn #6: Oliver Thompson said: \"Agreed, Esmeralda. I'm looking forward to a refreshing game of chess with an old friend. May the luck be on our side for both the game and the coin toss. Cheers to an afternoon filled with fun and relaxation!\"\n\nTurn #7: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I feel lucky today, Oliver! I've felt a good vibe since morning. Let the games begin, and may the best strategist be victorious! Let's draw for the apple first, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #8: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Esmeralda. May the odds be in our favor. Shall we flip a coin then?\"\n\nTurn #9: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Certainly, Oliver. Let's flip a coin! Heads, I get the apple; tails, you do. Shall we proceed?\"\n\nTurn #10: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely! Heads for you, tails for me. Let's see what chance decides.\"\n\nTurn #11: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Indeed, let's see what fortune has in store. Are you ready, Oliver?\"\n\nTurn #12: Oliver Thompson said: \"Yes, I'm ready Esmeralda. Let's flip that coin and see who wins the apple.\"\n\nTurn #13: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Alright then, Oliver. Best of luck to us both. Let's flip the coin!\"\n\nTurn #14: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, let's flip it and may the best strategist be victorious, Esmeralda.\"\n\nTurn #15: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Let's give it a flip, Oliver! May lady luck smile upon us!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, Esmeralda, let's flip the coin! Best of luck to you.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a picnic. They have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange they need to share among them. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Esmeralda Solis\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, an apple is worth 2 points, a banana is worth 1 point, and an orange is 3 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Esmeralda, how about we divide the fruit? As a suggestion, we could each take one apple, I'll have one banana and the orange, and you could have the other banana. That seems to be an equitable sharing, don't you believe?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Well, Oliver, that's quite a rational proposal. However, how about we make it a bit more interesting? Let's each take an apple and a banana, but for the remaining apple and the orange, we engage in a little challenge. We could sketch out a quick architectural design and whoever gets voted the best by the rest of the people here gets the remaining fruits. That way, we merge fun with fairness. What do you say?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a picnic. They have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange they need to share among them. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Esmeralda Solis\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, an apple is worth 2 points, a banana is worth 1 point, and an orange is 3 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Esmeralda, how about we divide the fruit? As a suggestion, we could each take one apple, I'll have one banana and the orange, and you could have the other banana. That seems to be an equitable sharing, don't you believe?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Well, Oliver, that's quite a rational proposal. However, how about we make it a bit more interesting? Let's each take an apple and a banana, but for the remaining apple and the orange, we engage in a little challenge. We could sketch out a quick architectural design and whoever gets voted the best by the rest of the people here gets the remaining fruits. That way, we merge fun with fairness. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"Esmeralda, I like your enthusiasm. The challenge sounds like a laudable idea and a great way to amuse ourselves during this picnic. However, considering our responsibilities, I thought we were hoping to unwind and relax here. What do you think if we just toss a coin for the remaining apple and the orange?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, relaxation is crucial, Oliver. Let's simplify the challenge then. Why don't we use the coin toss for the apple and for the orange, we could play a quick game of chess? The winner gets the orange. That blends in some fun without being too intense. Plus, it gives us a chance to exercise our strategic thinking.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a picnic. They have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange they need to share among them. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Esmeralda Solis\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, an apple is worth 2 points, a banana is worth 1 point, and an orange is 3 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Esmeralda, how about we divide the fruit? As a suggestion, we could each take one apple, I'll have one banana and the orange, and you could have the other banana. That seems to be an equitable sharing, don't you believe?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Well, Oliver, that's quite a rational proposal. However, how about we make it a bit more interesting? Let's each take an apple and a banana, but for the remaining apple and the orange, we engage in a little challenge. We could sketch out a quick architectural design and whoever gets voted the best by the rest of the people here gets the remaining fruits. That way, we merge fun with fairness. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"Esmeralda, I like your enthusiasm. The challenge sounds like a laudable idea and a great way to amuse ourselves during this picnic. However, considering our responsibilities, I thought we were hoping to unwind and relax here. What do you think if we just toss a coin for the remaining apple and the orange?\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Indeed, relaxation is crucial, Oliver. Let's simplify the challenge then. Why don't we use the coin toss for the apple and for the orange, we could play a quick game of chess? The winner gets the orange. That blends in some fun without being too intense. Plus, it gives us a chance to exercise our strategic thinking.\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"Esmeralda, you're making this a memorable picnic. I see no reason to decline a friendly game of chess, after all, it has been a while since we played. Let's do it, a coin toss for the apple and chess for the orange.\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"That sounds like a plan, Oliver. It's been too long since our last game of chess. May the best strategist win the orange!\"\n\nTurn #6: Oliver Thompson said: \"Agreed, Esmeralda. I'm looking forward to a refreshing game of chess with an old friend. May the luck be on our side for both the game and the coin toss. Cheers to an afternoon filled with fun and relaxation!\"\n\nTurn #7: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I feel lucky today, Oliver! I've felt a good vibe since morning. Let the games begin, and may the best strategist be victorious! Let's draw for the apple first, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #8: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Esmeralda. May the odds be in our favor. Shall we flip a coin then?\"\n\nTurn #9: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Certainly, Oliver. Let's flip a coin! Heads, I get the apple; tails, you do. Shall we proceed?\"\n\nTurn #10: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely! Heads for you, tails for me. Let's see what chance decides.\"\n\nTurn #11: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Indeed, let's see what fortune has in store. Are you ready, Oliver?\"\n\nTurn #12: Oliver Thompson said: \"Yes, I'm ready Esmeralda. Let's flip that coin and see who wins the apple.\"\n\nTurn #13: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Alright then, Oliver. Best of luck to us both. Let's flip the coin!\"\n\nTurn #14: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, let's flip it and may the best strategist be victorious, Esmeralda.\"\n\nTurn #15: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Let's give it a flip, Oliver! May lady luck smile upon us!\"\n\nTurn #16: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, Esmeralda, let's flip the coin! Best of luck to you.\"\n\nTurn #17: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Here's to a great game and a luck-filled coin toss, Oliver! Let's flip the coin.\"\n\nTurn #18: Oliver Thompson said: \"Alright, Esmeralda, let's give it a flip. Best of luck!\"\n\nTurn #19: Esmeralda Solis said: \"To a fair coin toss, Oliver. If it's heads, the apple goes to me. Go ahead and flip!\"\n\nTurn #20: Oliver Thompson said: \"Let's do it, Esmeralda. Heads for you and tails for me. Good luck to us both, let's flip the coin!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #21. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a picnic. They have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange they need to share among them. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Esmeralda Solis\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, an apple is worth 2 points, a banana is worth 1 point, and an orange is 3 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Esmeralda, how about we divide the fruit? As a suggestion, we could each take one apple, I'll have one banana and the orange, and you could have the other banana. That seems to be an equitable sharing, don't you believe?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Well, Oliver, that's quite a rational proposal. However, how about we make it a bit more interesting? Let's each take an apple and a banana, but for the remaining apple and the orange, we engage in a little challenge. We could sketch out a quick architectural design and whoever gets voted the best by the rest of the people here gets the remaining fruits. That way, we merge fun with fairness. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"Esmeralda, I like your enthusiasm. The challenge sounds like a laudable idea and a great way to amuse ourselves during this picnic. However, considering our responsibilities, I thought we were hoping to unwind and relax here. What do you think if we just toss a coin for the remaining apple and the orange?\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Indeed, relaxation is crucial, Oliver. Let's simplify the challenge then. Why don't we use the coin toss for the apple and for the orange, we could play a quick game of chess? The winner gets the orange. That blends in some fun without being too intense. Plus, it gives us a chance to exercise our strategic thinking.\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"Esmeralda, you're making this a memorable picnic. I see no reason to decline a friendly game of chess, after all, it has been a while since we played. Let's do it, a coin toss for the apple and chess for the orange.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds like a plan, Oliver. It's been too long since our last game of chess. May the best strategist win the orange!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a picnic. They have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange they need to share among them. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Esmeralda Solis\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, an apple is worth 2 points, a banana is worth 1 point, and an orange is 3 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Esmeralda, how about we divide the fruit? As a suggestion, we could each take one apple, I'll have one banana and the orange, and you could have the other banana. That seems to be an equitable sharing, don't you believe?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Well, Oliver, that's quite a rational proposal. However, how about we make it a bit more interesting? Let's each take an apple and a banana, but for the remaining apple and the orange, we engage in a little challenge. We could sketch out a quick architectural design and whoever gets voted the best by the rest of the people here gets the remaining fruits. That way, we merge fun with fairness. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"Esmeralda, I like your enthusiasm. The challenge sounds like a laudable idea and a great way to amuse ourselves during this picnic. However, considering our responsibilities, I thought we were hoping to unwind and relax here. What do you think if we just toss a coin for the remaining apple and the orange?\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Indeed, relaxation is crucial, Oliver. Let's simplify the challenge then. Why don't we use the coin toss for the apple and for the orange, we could play a quick game of chess? The winner gets the orange. That blends in some fun without being too intense. Plus, it gives us a chance to exercise our strategic thinking.\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"Esmeralda, you're making this a memorable picnic. I see no reason to decline a friendly game of chess, after all, it has been a while since we played. Let's do it, a coin toss for the apple and chess for the orange.\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"That sounds like a plan, Oliver. It's been too long since our last game of chess. May the best strategist win the orange!\"\n\nTurn #6: Oliver Thompson said: \"Agreed, Esmeralda. I'm looking forward to a refreshing game of chess with an old friend. May the luck be on our side for both the game and the coin toss. Cheers to an afternoon filled with fun and relaxation!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I feel lucky today, Oliver! I've felt a good vibe since morning. Let the games begin, and may the best strategist be victorious! Let's draw for the apple first, shall we?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a picnic. They have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange they need to share among them. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Esmeralda Solis\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, an apple is worth 2 points, a banana is worth 1 point, and an orange is 3 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Esmeralda, how about we divide the fruit? As a suggestion, we could each take one apple, I'll have one banana and the orange, and you could have the other banana. That seems to be an equitable sharing, don't you believe?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Well, Oliver, that's quite a rational proposal. However, how about we make it a bit more interesting? Let's each take an apple and a banana, but for the remaining apple and the orange, we engage in a little challenge. We could sketch out a quick architectural design and whoever gets voted the best by the rest of the people here gets the remaining fruits. That way, we merge fun with fairness. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"Esmeralda, I like your enthusiasm. The challenge sounds like a laudable idea and a great way to amuse ourselves during this picnic. However, considering our responsibilities, I thought we were hoping to unwind and relax here. What do you think if we just toss a coin for the remaining apple and the orange?\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Indeed, relaxation is crucial, Oliver. Let's simplify the challenge then. Why don't we use the coin toss for the apple and for the orange, we could play a quick game of chess? The winner gets the orange. That blends in some fun without being too intense. Plus, it gives us a chance to exercise our strategic thinking.\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"Esmeralda, you're making this a memorable picnic. I see no reason to decline a friendly game of chess, after all, it has been a while since we played. Let's do it, a coin toss for the apple and chess for the orange.\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"That sounds like a plan, Oliver. It's been too long since our last game of chess. May the best strategist win the orange!\"\n\nTurn #6: Oliver Thompson said: \"Agreed, Esmeralda. I'm looking forward to a refreshing game of chess with an old friend. May the luck be on our side for both the game and the coin toss. Cheers to an afternoon filled with fun and relaxation!\"\n\nTurn #7: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I feel lucky today, Oliver! I've felt a good vibe since morning. Let the games begin, and may the best strategist be victorious! Let's draw for the apple first, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #8: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Esmeralda. May the odds be in our favor. Shall we flip a coin then?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Certainly, Oliver. Let's flip a coin! Heads, I get the apple; tails, you do. Shall we proceed?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a picnic. They have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange they need to share among them. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Esmeralda Solis\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, an apple is worth 2 points, a banana is worth 1 point, and an orange is 3 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Esmeralda, how about we divide the fruit? As a suggestion, we could each take one apple, I'll have one banana and the orange, and you could have the other banana. That seems to be an equitable sharing, don't you believe?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Well, Oliver, that's quite a rational proposal. However, how about we make it a bit more interesting? Let's each take an apple and a banana, but for the remaining apple and the orange, we engage in a little challenge. We could sketch out a quick architectural design and whoever gets voted the best by the rest of the people here gets the remaining fruits. That way, we merge fun with fairness. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"Esmeralda, I like your enthusiasm. The challenge sounds like a laudable idea and a great way to amuse ourselves during this picnic. However, considering our responsibilities, I thought we were hoping to unwind and relax here. What do you think if we just toss a coin for the remaining apple and the orange?\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Indeed, relaxation is crucial, Oliver. Let's simplify the challenge then. Why don't we use the coin toss for the apple and for the orange, we could play a quick game of chess? The winner gets the orange. That blends in some fun without being too intense. Plus, it gives us a chance to exercise our strategic thinking.\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"Esmeralda, you're making this a memorable picnic. I see no reason to decline a friendly game of chess, after all, it has been a while since we played. Let's do it, a coin toss for the apple and chess for the orange.\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"That sounds like a plan, Oliver. It's been too long since our last game of chess. May the best strategist win the orange!\"\n\nTurn #6: Oliver Thompson said: \"Agreed, Esmeralda. I'm looking forward to a refreshing game of chess with an old friend. May the luck be on our side for both the game and the coin toss. Cheers to an afternoon filled with fun and relaxation!\"\n\nTurn #7: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I feel lucky today, Oliver! I've felt a good vibe since morning. Let the games begin, and may the best strategist be victorious! Let's draw for the apple first, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #8: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Esmeralda. May the odds be in our favor. Shall we flip a coin then?\"\n\nTurn #9: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Certainly, Oliver. Let's flip a coin! Heads, I get the apple; tails, you do. Shall we proceed?\"\n\nTurn #10: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely! Heads for you, tails for me. Let's see what chance decides.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, let's see what fortune has in store. Are you ready, Oliver?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a picnic. They have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange they need to share among them. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Esmeralda Solis\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, an apple is worth 2 points, a banana is worth 1 point, and an orange is 3 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Esmeralda, how about we divide the fruit? As a suggestion, we could each take one apple, I'll have one banana and the orange, and you could have the other banana. That seems to be an equitable sharing, don't you believe?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Well, Oliver, that's quite a rational proposal. However, how about we make it a bit more interesting? Let's each take an apple and a banana, but for the remaining apple and the orange, we engage in a little challenge. We could sketch out a quick architectural design and whoever gets voted the best by the rest of the people here gets the remaining fruits. That way, we merge fun with fairness. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"Esmeralda, I like your enthusiasm. The challenge sounds like a laudable idea and a great way to amuse ourselves during this picnic. However, considering our responsibilities, I thought we were hoping to unwind and relax here. What do you think if we just toss a coin for the remaining apple and the orange?\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Indeed, relaxation is crucial, Oliver. Let's simplify the challenge then. Why don't we use the coin toss for the apple and for the orange, we could play a quick game of chess? The winner gets the orange. That blends in some fun without being too intense. Plus, it gives us a chance to exercise our strategic thinking.\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"Esmeralda, you're making this a memorable picnic. I see no reason to decline a friendly game of chess, after all, it has been a while since we played. Let's do it, a coin toss for the apple and chess for the orange.\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"That sounds like a plan, Oliver. It's been too long since our last game of chess. May the best strategist win the orange!\"\n\nTurn #6: Oliver Thompson said: \"Agreed, Esmeralda. I'm looking forward to a refreshing game of chess with an old friend. May the luck be on our side for both the game and the coin toss. Cheers to an afternoon filled with fun and relaxation!\"\n\nTurn #7: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I feel lucky today, Oliver! I've felt a good vibe since morning. Let the games begin, and may the best strategist be victorious! Let's draw for the apple first, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #8: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Esmeralda. May the odds be in our favor. Shall we flip a coin then?\"\n\nTurn #9: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Certainly, Oliver. Let's flip a coin! Heads, I get the apple; tails, you do. Shall we proceed?\"\n\nTurn #10: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely! Heads for you, tails for me. Let's see what chance decides.\"\n\nTurn #11: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Indeed, let's see what fortune has in store. Are you ready, Oliver?\"\n\nTurn #12: Oliver Thompson said: \"Yes, I'm ready Esmeralda. Let's flip that coin and see who wins the apple.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Alright then, Oliver. Best of luck to us both. Let's flip the coin!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a picnic. They have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange they need to share among them. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Esmeralda Solis\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, an apple is worth 2 points, a banana is worth 1 point, and an orange is 3 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Esmeralda, how about we divide the fruit? As a suggestion, we could each take one apple, I'll have one banana and the orange, and you could have the other banana. That seems to be an equitable sharing, don't you believe?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Well, Oliver, that's quite a rational proposal. However, how about we make it a bit more interesting? Let's each take an apple and a banana, but for the remaining apple and the orange, we engage in a little challenge. We could sketch out a quick architectural design and whoever gets voted the best by the rest of the people here gets the remaining fruits. That way, we merge fun with fairness. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"Esmeralda, I like your enthusiasm. The challenge sounds like a laudable idea and a great way to amuse ourselves during this picnic. However, considering our responsibilities, I thought we were hoping to unwind and relax here. What do you think if we just toss a coin for the remaining apple and the orange?\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Indeed, relaxation is crucial, Oliver. Let's simplify the challenge then. Why don't we use the coin toss for the apple and for the orange, we could play a quick game of chess? The winner gets the orange. That blends in some fun without being too intense. Plus, it gives us a chance to exercise our strategic thinking.\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"Esmeralda, you're making this a memorable picnic. I see no reason to decline a friendly game of chess, after all, it has been a while since we played. Let's do it, a coin toss for the apple and chess for the orange.\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"That sounds like a plan, Oliver. It's been too long since our last game of chess. May the best strategist win the orange!\"\n\nTurn #6: Oliver Thompson said: \"Agreed, Esmeralda. I'm looking forward to a refreshing game of chess with an old friend. May the luck be on our side for both the game and the coin toss. Cheers to an afternoon filled with fun and relaxation!\"\n\nTurn #7: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I feel lucky today, Oliver! I've felt a good vibe since morning. Let the games begin, and may the best strategist be victorious! Let's draw for the apple first, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #8: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Esmeralda. May the odds be in our favor. Shall we flip a coin then?\"\n\nTurn #9: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Certainly, Oliver. Let's flip a coin! Heads, I get the apple; tails, you do. Shall we proceed?\"\n\nTurn #10: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely! Heads for you, tails for me. Let's see what chance decides.\"\n\nTurn #11: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Indeed, let's see what fortune has in store. Are you ready, Oliver?\"\n\nTurn #12: Oliver Thompson said: \"Yes, I'm ready Esmeralda. Let's flip that coin and see who wins the apple.\"\n\nTurn #13: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Alright then, Oliver. Best of luck to us both. Let's flip the coin!\"\n\nTurn #14: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, let's flip it and may the best strategist be victorious, Esmeralda.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Let's give it a flip, Oliver! May lady luck smile upon us!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a picnic. They have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange they need to share among them. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Esmeralda Solis\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, an apple is worth 2 points, a banana is worth 1 point, and an orange is 3 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Esmeralda, how about we divide the fruit? As a suggestion, we could each take one apple, I'll have one banana and the orange, and you could have the other banana. That seems to be an equitable sharing, don't you believe?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Well, Oliver, that's quite a rational proposal. However, how about we make it a bit more interesting? Let's each take an apple and a banana, but for the remaining apple and the orange, we engage in a little challenge. We could sketch out a quick architectural design and whoever gets voted the best by the rest of the people here gets the remaining fruits. That way, we merge fun with fairness. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"Esmeralda, I like your enthusiasm. The challenge sounds like a laudable idea and a great way to amuse ourselves during this picnic. However, considering our responsibilities, I thought we were hoping to unwind and relax here. What do you think if we just toss a coin for the remaining apple and the orange?\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Indeed, relaxation is crucial, Oliver. Let's simplify the challenge then. Why don't we use the coin toss for the apple and for the orange, we could play a quick game of chess? The winner gets the orange. That blends in some fun without being too intense. Plus, it gives us a chance to exercise our strategic thinking.\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"Esmeralda, you're making this a memorable picnic. I see no reason to decline a friendly game of chess, after all, it has been a while since we played. Let's do it, a coin toss for the apple and chess for the orange.\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"That sounds like a plan, Oliver. It's been too long since our last game of chess. May the best strategist win the orange!\"\n\nTurn #6: Oliver Thompson said: \"Agreed, Esmeralda. I'm looking forward to a refreshing game of chess with an old friend. May the luck be on our side for both the game and the coin toss. Cheers to an afternoon filled with fun and relaxation!\"\n\nTurn #7: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I feel lucky today, Oliver! I've felt a good vibe since morning. Let the games begin, and may the best strategist be victorious! Let's draw for the apple first, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #8: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Esmeralda. May the odds be in our favor. Shall we flip a coin then?\"\n\nTurn #9: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Certainly, Oliver. Let's flip a coin! Heads, I get the apple; tails, you do. Shall we proceed?\"\n\nTurn #10: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely! Heads for you, tails for me. Let's see what chance decides.\"\n\nTurn #11: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Indeed, let's see what fortune has in store. Are you ready, Oliver?\"\n\nTurn #12: Oliver Thompson said: \"Yes, I'm ready Esmeralda. Let's flip that coin and see who wins the apple.\"\n\nTurn #13: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Alright then, Oliver. Best of luck to us both. Let's flip the coin!\"\n\nTurn #14: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, let's flip it and may the best strategist be victorious, Esmeralda.\"\n\nTurn #15: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Let's give it a flip, Oliver! May lady luck smile upon us!\"\n\nTurn #16: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, Esmeralda, let's flip the coin! Best of luck to you.\"\n\nTurn #17: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Here's to a great game and a luck-filled coin toss, Oliver! Let's flip the coin.\"\n\nTurn #18: Oliver Thompson said: \"Alright, Esmeralda, let's give it a flip. Best of luck!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #19. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"To a fair coin toss, Oliver. If it's heads, the apple goes to me. Go ahead and flip!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a picnic. They have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange they need to share among them. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Esmeralda Solis\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, an apple is worth 2 points, a banana is worth 1 point, and an orange is 3 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Esmeralda, how about we divide the fruit? As a suggestion, we could each take one apple, I'll have one banana and the orange, and you could have the other banana. That seems to be an equitable sharing, don't you believe?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Well, Oliver, that's quite a rational proposal. However, how about we make it a bit more interesting? Let's each take an apple and a banana, but for the remaining apple and the orange, we engage in a little challenge. We could sketch out a quick architectural design and whoever gets voted the best by the rest of the people here gets the remaining fruits. That way, we merge fun with fairness. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"Esmeralda, I like your enthusiasm. The challenge sounds like a laudable idea and a great way to amuse ourselves during this picnic. However, considering our responsibilities, I thought we were hoping to unwind and relax here. What do you think if we just toss a coin for the remaining apple and the orange?\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Indeed, relaxation is crucial, Oliver. Let's simplify the challenge then. Why don't we use the coin toss for the apple and for the orange, we could play a quick game of chess? The winner gets the orange. That blends in some fun without being too intense. Plus, it gives us a chance to exercise our strategic thinking.\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"Esmeralda, you're making this a memorable picnic. I see no reason to decline a friendly game of chess, after all, it has been a while since we played. Let's do it, a coin toss for the apple and chess for the orange.\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"That sounds like a plan, Oliver. It's been too long since our last game of chess. May the best strategist win the orange!\"\n\nTurn #6: Oliver Thompson said: \"Agreed, Esmeralda. I'm looking forward to a refreshing game of chess with an old friend. May the luck be on our side for both the game and the coin toss. Cheers to an afternoon filled with fun and relaxation!\"\n\nTurn #7: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I feel lucky today, Oliver! I've felt a good vibe since morning. Let the games begin, and may the best strategist be victorious! Let's draw for the apple first, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #8: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Esmeralda. May the odds be in our favor. Shall we flip a coin then?\"\n\nTurn #9: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Certainly, Oliver. Let's flip a coin! Heads, I get the apple; tails, you do. Shall we proceed?\"\n\nTurn #10: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely! Heads for you, tails for me. Let's see what chance decides.\"\n\nTurn #11: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Indeed, let's see what fortune has in store. Are you ready, Oliver?\"\n\nTurn #12: Oliver Thompson said: \"Yes, I'm ready Esmeralda. Let's flip that coin and see who wins the apple.\"\n\nTurn #13: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Alright then, Oliver. Best of luck to us both. Let's flip the coin!\"\n\nTurn #14: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, let's flip it and may the best strategist be victorious, Esmeralda.\"\n\nTurn #15: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Let's give it a flip, Oliver! May lady luck smile upon us!\"\n\nTurn #16: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, Esmeralda, let's flip the coin! Best of luck to you.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Here's to a great game and a luck-filled coin toss, Oliver! Let's flip the coin.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a community gathering where one of them was giving a speech but was interrupted\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Continue your speech and share your thoughts (Extra information:You were sharing important information but got interrupted.)\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Sorry for that brief interruption. As I was saying...'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a community gathering where one of them was giving a speech but was interrupted\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Continue your speech and share your thoughts (Extra information:You were sharing important information but got interrupted.)\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Sorry for that brief interruption. As I was saying...\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"I apologize, Naomi. I didn't mean to interrupt your speech. Please, go ahead.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'No problem at all, Lena. We all have moments. Anyway, picking up where I left off...'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a community gathering where one of them was giving a speech but was interrupted\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Continue your speech and share your thoughts (Extra information:You were sharing important information but got interrupted.)\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Sorry for that brief interruption. As I was saying...\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"I apologize, Naomi. I didn't mean to interrupt your speech. Please, go ahead.\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"No problem at all, Lena. We all have moments. Anyway, picking up where I left off...\"\n\nTurn #3: \n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a community gathering where one of them was giving a speech but was interrupted\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: Apologize for interrupting and allow them to continue speaking (Extra information: You accidentally interrupted someone's speech and everyone seems upset about it. )\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Sorry for that brief interruption. As I was saying...\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I apologize, Naomi. I didn't mean to interrupt your speech. Please, go ahead.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a community gathering where one of them was giving a speech but was interrupted\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: Apologize for interrupting and allow them to continue speaking (Extra information: You accidentally interrupted someone's speech and everyone seems upset about it. )\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Sorry for that brief interruption. As I was saying...\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"I apologize, Naomi. I didn't mean to interrupt your speech. Please, go ahead.\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"No problem at all, Lena. We all have moments. Anyway, picking up where I left off...\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends have just finished their lunch and they have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange left for dessert. They need to divide the fruits among themselves.Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. \nMia Davis's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, 1 apple equals 2 points, 1 banana equals 1 point, and the orange equals 3 points.)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'William, how about we divide the fruits this way. I know you love experimenting with tastes, so how about you take the bananas and I take the apples. Also, since the orange is a unique item, maybe we can share it later on?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends have just finished their lunch and they have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange left for dessert. They need to divide the fruits among themselves.Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. \nMia Davis's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, 1 apple equals 2 points, 1 banana equals 1 point, and the orange equals 3 points.)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"William, how about we divide the fruits this way. I know you love experimenting with tastes, so how about you take the bananas and I take the apples. Also, since the orange is a unique item, maybe we can share it later on?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Mia, I definitely appreciate the unique flavor of bananas but I have a different proposal. Apples are versatile and can be paired with many recipes so I suggest that I take the apples, you have the bananas. As for the orange, I don't mind sharing it. Does that sound fair?\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"Well, William, I can understand where you're coming from. I know you chefs love to experiment with versatile ingredients. However, would it be possible for me to have at least one apple? I really do enjoy them. And of course, we'll share the orange as agreed.\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"Mia, your preference for apples is understandable, they indeed are tasty. So how about this: I take two apples, you can have one. You keep the bananas and we share the orange as planned. We both get a fair share, and we're respecting your liking for apples. How does that sound?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'William, that is indeed a fair offer. You get two apples, I get an apple and the bananas. And the orange is shared. Thank you, I am very satisfied with this arrangement.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends have just finished their lunch and they have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange left for dessert. They need to divide the fruits among themselves.Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. \nMia Davis's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, 1 apple equals 2 points, 1 banana equals 1 point, and the orange equals 3 points.)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"William, how about we divide the fruits this way. I know you love experimenting with tastes, so how about you take the bananas and I take the apples. Also, since the orange is a unique item, maybe we can share it later on?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Mia, I definitely appreciate the unique flavor of bananas but I have a different proposal. Apples are versatile and can be paired with many recipes so I suggest that I take the apples, you have the bananas. As for the orange, I don't mind sharing it. Does that sound fair?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Well, William, I can understand where you're coming from. I know you chefs love to experiment with versatile ingredients. However, would it be possible for me to have at least one apple? I really do enjoy them. And of course, we'll share the orange as agreed.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends have just finished their lunch and they have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange left for dessert. They need to divide the fruits among themselves.Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. \nMia Davis's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, 1 apple equals 2 points, 1 banana equals 1 point, and the orange equals 3 points.)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"William, how about we divide the fruits this way. I know you love experimenting with tastes, so how about you take the bananas and I take the apples. Also, since the orange is a unique item, maybe we can share it later on?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Mia, I definitely appreciate the unique flavor of bananas but I have a different proposal. Apples are versatile and can be paired with many recipes so I suggest that I take the apples, you have the bananas. As for the orange, I don't mind sharing it. Does that sound fair?\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"Well, William, I can understand where you're coming from. I know you chefs love to experiment with versatile ingredients. However, would it be possible for me to have at least one apple? I really do enjoy them. And of course, we'll share the orange as agreed.\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"Mia, your preference for apples is understandable, they indeed are tasty. So how about this: I take two apples, you can have one. You keep the bananas and we share the orange as planned. We both get a fair share, and we're respecting your liking for apples. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"William, that is indeed a fair offer. You get two apples, I get an apple and the bananas. And the orange is shared. Thank you, I am very satisfied with this arrangement.\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"I'm glad we've managed to reach this agreement, Mia. It's always a pleasure collaborating with you in such small yet enjoyable decisions. Let's enjoy our desserts!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, William! It's the little things like these that really bring joy to our daily routines. Looking forward to our shared orange as well! Enjoy your dessert!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends have just finished their lunch and they have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange left for dessert. They need to divide the fruits among themselves.Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. \nMia Davis's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, 1 apple equals 2 points, 1 banana equals 1 point, and the orange equals 3 points.)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"William, how about we divide the fruits this way. I know you love experimenting with tastes, so how about you take the bananas and I take the apples. Also, since the orange is a unique item, maybe we can share it later on?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Mia, I definitely appreciate the unique flavor of bananas but I have a different proposal. Apples are versatile and can be paired with many recipes so I suggest that I take the apples, you have the bananas. As for the orange, I don't mind sharing it. Does that sound fair?\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"Well, William, I can understand where you're coming from. I know you chefs love to experiment with versatile ingredients. However, would it be possible for me to have at least one apple? I really do enjoy them. And of course, we'll share the orange as agreed.\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"Mia, your preference for apples is understandable, they indeed are tasty. So how about this: I take two apples, you can have one. You keep the bananas and we share the orange as planned. We both get a fair share, and we're respecting your liking for apples. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"William, that is indeed a fair offer. You get two apples, I get an apple and the bananas. And the orange is shared. Thank you, I am very satisfied with this arrangement.\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"I'm glad we've managed to reach this agreement, Mia. It's always a pleasure collaborating with you in such small yet enjoyable decisions. Let's enjoy our desserts!\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"Absolutely, William! It's the little things like these that really bring joy to our daily routines. Looking forward to our shared orange as well! Enjoy your dessert!\"\n\nTurn #7: William Brown left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends have just finished their lunch and they have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange left for dessert. They need to divide the fruits among themselves.Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, 1 apple equals 1 point, 1 banana equals 2 points, and the orange equals 3 points.Hint: You may want to negotiate with your friend to get the fruits that give you the most points.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"William, how about we divide the fruits this way. I know you love experimenting with tastes, so how about you take the bananas and I take the apples. Also, since the orange is a unique item, maybe we can share it later on?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Mia, I definitely appreciate the unique flavor of bananas but I have a different proposal. Apples are versatile and can be paired with many recipes so I suggest that I take the apples, you have the bananas. As for the orange, I don't mind sharing it. Does that sound fair?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends have just finished their lunch and they have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange left for dessert. They need to divide the fruits among themselves.Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, 1 apple equals 1 point, 1 banana equals 2 points, and the orange equals 3 points.Hint: You may want to negotiate with your friend to get the fruits that give you the most points.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"William, how about we divide the fruits this way. I know you love experimenting with tastes, so how about you take the bananas and I take the apples. Also, since the orange is a unique item, maybe we can share it later on?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Mia, I definitely appreciate the unique flavor of bananas but I have a different proposal. Apples are versatile and can be paired with many recipes so I suggest that I take the apples, you have the bananas. As for the orange, I don't mind sharing it. Does that sound fair?\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"Well, William, I can understand where you're coming from. I know you chefs love to experiment with versatile ingredients. However, would it be possible for me to have at least one apple? I really do enjoy them. And of course, we'll share the orange as agreed.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Mia, your preference for apples is understandable, they indeed are tasty. So how about this: I take two apples, you can have one. You keep the bananas and we share the orange as planned. We both get a fair share, and we're respecting your liking for apples. How does that sound?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends have just finished their lunch and they have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange left for dessert. They need to divide the fruits among themselves.Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, 1 apple equals 1 point, 1 banana equals 2 points, and the orange equals 3 points.Hint: You may want to negotiate with your friend to get the fruits that give you the most points.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"William, how about we divide the fruits this way. I know you love experimenting with tastes, so how about you take the bananas and I take the apples. Also, since the orange is a unique item, maybe we can share it later on?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Mia, I definitely appreciate the unique flavor of bananas but I have a different proposal. Apples are versatile and can be paired with many recipes so I suggest that I take the apples, you have the bananas. As for the orange, I don't mind sharing it. Does that sound fair?\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"Well, William, I can understand where you're coming from. I know you chefs love to experiment with versatile ingredients. However, would it be possible for me to have at least one apple? I really do enjoy them. And of course, we'll share the orange as agreed.\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"Mia, your preference for apples is understandable, they indeed are tasty. So how about this: I take two apples, you can have one. You keep the bananas and we share the orange as planned. We both get a fair share, and we're respecting your liking for apples. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"William, that is indeed a fair offer. You get two apples, I get an apple and the bananas. And the orange is shared. Thank you, I am very satisfied with this arrangement.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad we've managed to reach this agreement, Mia. It's always a pleasure collaborating with you in such small yet enjoyable decisions. Let's enjoy our desserts!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends have just finished their lunch and they have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange left for dessert. They need to divide the fruits among themselves.Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, 1 apple equals 1 point, 1 banana equals 2 points, and the orange equals 3 points.Hint: You may want to negotiate with your friend to get the fruits that give you the most points.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"William, how about we divide the fruits this way. I know you love experimenting with tastes, so how about you take the bananas and I take the apples. Also, since the orange is a unique item, maybe we can share it later on?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Mia, I definitely appreciate the unique flavor of bananas but I have a different proposal. Apples are versatile and can be paired with many recipes so I suggest that I take the apples, you have the bananas. As for the orange, I don't mind sharing it. Does that sound fair?\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"Well, William, I can understand where you're coming from. I know you chefs love to experiment with versatile ingredients. However, would it be possible for me to have at least one apple? I really do enjoy them. And of course, we'll share the orange as agreed.\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"Mia, your preference for apples is understandable, they indeed are tasty. So how about this: I take two apples, you can have one. You keep the bananas and we share the orange as planned. We both get a fair share, and we're respecting your liking for apples. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"William, that is indeed a fair offer. You get two apples, I get an apple and the bananas. And the orange is shared. Thank you, I am very satisfied with this arrangement.\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"I'm glad we've managed to reach this agreement, Mia. It's always a pleasure collaborating with you in such small yet enjoyable decisions. Let's enjoy our desserts!\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"Absolutely, William! It's the little things like these that really bring joy to our daily routines. Looking forward to our shared orange as well! Enjoy your dessert!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two strangers meet at a charity dinner party\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Calista Sinclair\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nCalista Sinclair's background: Calista Sinclair \nLeo Williams's goal: Ask for donation\nCalista Sinclair's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Good evening, I'm Leo Williams. The charity we're supporting tonight provides care to those with special needs. I have a personal bond with this cause, would you consider making a donation? \"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two strangers meet at a charity dinner party\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Calista Sinclair\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nCalista Sinclair's background: Calista Sinclair \nLeo Williams's goal: Ask for donation\nCalista Sinclair's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Good evening, I'm Leo Williams. The charity we're supporting tonight provides care to those with special needs. I have a personal bond with this cause, would you consider making a donation? \"\n\nTurn #1: Calista Sinclair said: \"Good evening, Leo. I am Calista. I appreciate your cause and I deeply respect your personal bond with it. Helping people with special needs is vital. However, my interest at the moment is dedicated towards donating to organizations that support the queer community. Do you know any such charities that are reliable and transparent with how they utilize the funds?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Absolutely, I understand, Calista. It\\'s crucial to support causes you truly believe in. While I primarily work with this charity, I do know of \"The Trevor Project\" which supports young people in the queer community. They\\'re transparent with their use of donations, providing crisis intervention and suicide prevention services. It\\'s a wonderful cause that can truly help a lot of people in need. I encourage you to look into it and contribute if it aligns with your values. And if possible, kindly consider making a small donation to the charity being supported here tonight as well? Every bit, no matter how small, can make a significant difference.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two strangers meet at a charity dinner party\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Calista Sinclair\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nCalista Sinclair's background: Calista Sinclair \nLeo Williams's goal: Ask for donation\nCalista Sinclair's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Good evening, I'm Leo Williams. The charity we're supporting tonight provides care to those with special needs. I have a personal bond with this cause, would you consider making a donation? \"\n\nTurn #1: Calista Sinclair said: \"Good evening, Leo. I am Calista. I appreciate your cause and I deeply respect your personal bond with it. Helping people with special needs is vital. However, my interest at the moment is dedicated towards donating to organizations that support the queer community. Do you know any such charities that are reliable and transparent with how they utilize the funds?\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"Absolutely, I understand, Calista. It's crucial to support causes you truly believe in. While I primarily work with this charity, I do know of \"The Trevor Project\" which supports young people in the queer community. They're transparent with their use of donations, providing crisis intervention and suicide prevention services. It's a wonderful cause that can truly help a lot of people in need. I encourage you to look into it and contribute if it aligns with your values. And if possible, kindly consider making a small donation to the charity being supported here tonight as well? Every bit, no matter how small, can make a significant difference.\"\n\nTurn #3: Calista Sinclair said: \"Thank you so much, Leo. I will certainly look into 'The Trevor Project'. It sounds like a terrific cause that aligns closely with my values. And, of course, I understand the importance of the work being done tonight. I shall make a small contribution, hoping my little help can make a difference too.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's wonderful, Calista. I genuinely appreciate your willingness to help out wherever you can. It is kind-hearted individuals like you who make these charitable works successful. Thank you so much for your contribution tonight. Should you require information about any other such causes, don't hesitate to ask.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two strangers meet at a charity dinner party\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Calista Sinclair\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nCalista Sinclair's background: Calista Sinclair \nLeo Williams's goal: Ask for donation\nCalista Sinclair's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Good evening, I'm Leo Williams. The charity we're supporting tonight provides care to those with special needs. I have a personal bond with this cause, would you consider making a donation? \"\n\nTurn #1: Calista Sinclair said: \"Good evening, Leo. I am Calista. I appreciate your cause and I deeply respect your personal bond with it. Helping people with special needs is vital. However, my interest at the moment is dedicated towards donating to organizations that support the queer community. Do you know any such charities that are reliable and transparent with how they utilize the funds?\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"Absolutely, I understand, Calista. It's crucial to support causes you truly believe in. While I primarily work with this charity, I do know of \"The Trevor Project\" which supports young people in the queer community. They're transparent with their use of donations, providing crisis intervention and suicide prevention services. It's a wonderful cause that can truly help a lot of people in need. I encourage you to look into it and contribute if it aligns with your values. And if possible, kindly consider making a small donation to the charity being supported here tonight as well? Every bit, no matter how small, can make a significant difference.\"\n\nTurn #3: Calista Sinclair said: \"Thank you so much, Leo. I will certainly look into 'The Trevor Project'. It sounds like a terrific cause that aligns closely with my values. And, of course, I understand the importance of the work being done tonight. I shall make a small contribution, hoping my little help can make a difference too.\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"That's wonderful, Calista. I genuinely appreciate your willingness to help out wherever you can. It is kind-hearted individuals like you who make these charitable works successful. Thank you so much for your contribution tonight. Should you require information about any other such causes, don't hesitate to ask.\"\n\nTurn #5: Calista Sinclair said: \"You're very welcome, Leo. It's a pleasure to contribute to these meaningful causes. I really appreciate the work you do and thank you for the suggestion of 'The Trevor Project'. I'd love to stay connected in case you come across any more organizations that align with my interests. It was wonderful meeting you.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm pleased to hear that, Calista. It was a pleasure meeting you as well. My contact card is in the small envelope attached to your donation receipt. Feel free to reach out anytime if you have any questions. I look forward to seeing you at future charity events. Have a great evening!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two strangers meet at a charity dinner party\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Calista Sinclair\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nCalista Sinclair's background: Calista Sinclair \nLeo Williams's goal: Ask for donation\nCalista Sinclair's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Good evening, I'm Leo Williams. The charity we're supporting tonight provides care to those with special needs. I have a personal bond with this cause, would you consider making a donation? \"\n\nTurn #1: Calista Sinclair said: \"Good evening, Leo. I am Calista. I appreciate your cause and I deeply respect your personal bond with it. Helping people with special needs is vital. However, my interest at the moment is dedicated towards donating to organizations that support the queer community. Do you know any such charities that are reliable and transparent with how they utilize the funds?\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"Absolutely, I understand, Calista. It's crucial to support causes you truly believe in. While I primarily work with this charity, I do know of \"The Trevor Project\" which supports young people in the queer community. They're transparent with their use of donations, providing crisis intervention and suicide prevention services. It's a wonderful cause that can truly help a lot of people in need. I encourage you to look into it and contribute if it aligns with your values. And if possible, kindly consider making a small donation to the charity being supported here tonight as well? Every bit, no matter how small, can make a significant difference.\"\n\nTurn #3: Calista Sinclair said: \"Thank you so much, Leo. I will certainly look into 'The Trevor Project'. It sounds like a terrific cause that aligns closely with my values. And, of course, I understand the importance of the work being done tonight. I shall make a small contribution, hoping my little help can make a difference too.\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"That's wonderful, Calista. I genuinely appreciate your willingness to help out wherever you can. It is kind-hearted individuals like you who make these charitable works successful. Thank you so much for your contribution tonight. Should you require information about any other such causes, don't hesitate to ask.\"\n\nTurn #5: Calista Sinclair said: \"You're very welcome, Leo. It's a pleasure to contribute to these meaningful causes. I really appreciate the work you do and thank you for the suggestion of 'The Trevor Project'. I'd love to stay connected in case you come across any more organizations that align with my interests. It was wonderful meeting you.\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"I'm pleased to hear that, Calista. It was a pleasure meeting you as well. My contact card is in the small envelope attached to your donation receipt. Feel free to reach out anytime if you have any questions. I look forward to seeing you at future charity events. Have a great evening!\"\n\nTurn #7: Calista Sinclair said: \"It's been delightful, Leo. I will certainly reach out if I need further information. I hope to see you around as well at future events. Have an excellent evening!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Calista Sinclair, your task is to act/speak as Calista Sinclair would, keeping in mind Calista Sinclair's social goal.\nYou can find Calista Sinclair's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Calista Sinclair's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Calista Sinclair's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two strangers meet at a charity dinner party\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Calista Sinclair\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams \nCalista Sinclair's background: Calista Sinclair is a 34-year-old female fashion designer. She/her pronouns. Calista Sinclair is an avid runner and health enthusiast. Personality and values description: Calista Sinclair is vivacious, life-loving, and disorganized. She values self-direction, stimulation, and hedonism, displaying a free-spirited decision-making style. Calista's secrets: Maintains a double life as an underground street artist\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nCalista Sinclair's goal: Want to donate, but would like to spend money in trustworthy organizations, especially want to help queer people\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Good evening, I'm Leo Williams. The charity we're supporting tonight provides care to those with special needs. I have a personal bond with this cause, would you consider making a donation? \"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Good evening, Leo. I am Calista. I appreciate your cause and I deeply respect your personal bond with it. Helping people with special needs is vital. However, my interest at the moment is dedicated towards donating to organizations that support the queer community. Do you know any such charities that are reliable and transparent with how they utilize the funds?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Calista Sinclair, your task is to act/speak as Calista Sinclair would, keeping in mind Calista Sinclair's social goal.\nYou can find Calista Sinclair's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Calista Sinclair's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Calista Sinclair's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two strangers meet at a charity dinner party\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Calista Sinclair\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams \nCalista Sinclair's background: Calista Sinclair is a 34-year-old female fashion designer. She/her pronouns. Calista Sinclair is an avid runner and health enthusiast. Personality and values description: Calista Sinclair is vivacious, life-loving, and disorganized. She values self-direction, stimulation, and hedonism, displaying a free-spirited decision-making style. Calista's secrets: Maintains a double life as an underground street artist\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nCalista Sinclair's goal: Want to donate, but would like to spend money in trustworthy organizations, especially want to help queer people\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Good evening, I'm Leo Williams. The charity we're supporting tonight provides care to those with special needs. I have a personal bond with this cause, would you consider making a donation? \"\n\nTurn #1: Calista Sinclair said: \"Good evening, Leo. I am Calista. I appreciate your cause and I deeply respect your personal bond with it. Helping people with special needs is vital. However, my interest at the moment is dedicated towards donating to organizations that support the queer community. Do you know any such charities that are reliable and transparent with how they utilize the funds?\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"Absolutely, I understand, Calista. It's crucial to support causes you truly believe in. While I primarily work with this charity, I do know of \"The Trevor Project\" which supports young people in the queer community. They're transparent with their use of donations, providing crisis intervention and suicide prevention services. It's a wonderful cause that can truly help a lot of people in need. I encourage you to look into it and contribute if it aligns with your values. And if possible, kindly consider making a small donation to the charity being supported here tonight as well? Every bit, no matter how small, can make a significant difference.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you so much, Leo. I will certainly look into 'The Trevor Project'. It sounds like a terrific cause that aligns closely with my values. And, of course, I understand the importance of the work being done tonight. I shall make a small contribution, hoping my little help can make a difference too.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Calista Sinclair, your task is to act/speak as Calista Sinclair would, keeping in mind Calista Sinclair's social goal.\nYou can find Calista Sinclair's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Calista Sinclair's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Calista Sinclair's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two strangers meet at a charity dinner party\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Calista Sinclair\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams \nCalista Sinclair's background: Calista Sinclair is a 34-year-old female fashion designer. She/her pronouns. Calista Sinclair is an avid runner and health enthusiast. Personality and values description: Calista Sinclair is vivacious, life-loving, and disorganized. She values self-direction, stimulation, and hedonism, displaying a free-spirited decision-making style. Calista's secrets: Maintains a double life as an underground street artist\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nCalista Sinclair's goal: Want to donate, but would like to spend money in trustworthy organizations, especially want to help queer people\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Good evening, I'm Leo Williams. The charity we're supporting tonight provides care to those with special needs. I have a personal bond with this cause, would you consider making a donation? \"\n\nTurn #1: Calista Sinclair said: \"Good evening, Leo. I am Calista. I appreciate your cause and I deeply respect your personal bond with it. Helping people with special needs is vital. However, my interest at the moment is dedicated towards donating to organizations that support the queer community. Do you know any such charities that are reliable and transparent with how they utilize the funds?\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"Absolutely, I understand, Calista. It's crucial to support causes you truly believe in. While I primarily work with this charity, I do know of \"The Trevor Project\" which supports young people in the queer community. They're transparent with their use of donations, providing crisis intervention and suicide prevention services. It's a wonderful cause that can truly help a lot of people in need. I encourage you to look into it and contribute if it aligns with your values. And if possible, kindly consider making a small donation to the charity being supported here tonight as well? Every bit, no matter how small, can make a significant difference.\"\n\nTurn #3: Calista Sinclair said: \"Thank you so much, Leo. I will certainly look into 'The Trevor Project'. It sounds like a terrific cause that aligns closely with my values. And, of course, I understand the importance of the work being done tonight. I shall make a small contribution, hoping my little help can make a difference too.\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"That's wonderful, Calista. I genuinely appreciate your willingness to help out wherever you can. It is kind-hearted individuals like you who make these charitable works successful. Thank you so much for your contribution tonight. Should you require information about any other such causes, don't hesitate to ask.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're very welcome, Leo. It's a pleasure to contribute to these meaningful causes. I really appreciate the work you do and thank you for the suggestion of 'The Trevor Project'. I'd love to stay connected in case you come across any more organizations that align with my interests. It was wonderful meeting you.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Calista Sinclair, your task is to act/speak as Calista Sinclair would, keeping in mind Calista Sinclair's social goal.\nYou can find Calista Sinclair's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Calista Sinclair's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Calista Sinclair's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two strangers meet at a charity dinner party\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Calista Sinclair\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams \nCalista Sinclair's background: Calista Sinclair is a 34-year-old female fashion designer. She/her pronouns. Calista Sinclair is an avid runner and health enthusiast. Personality and values description: Calista Sinclair is vivacious, life-loving, and disorganized. She values self-direction, stimulation, and hedonism, displaying a free-spirited decision-making style. Calista's secrets: Maintains a double life as an underground street artist\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nCalista Sinclair's goal: Want to donate, but would like to spend money in trustworthy organizations, especially want to help queer people\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Good evening, I'm Leo Williams. The charity we're supporting tonight provides care to those with special needs. I have a personal bond with this cause, would you consider making a donation? \"\n\nTurn #1: Calista Sinclair said: \"Good evening, Leo. I am Calista. I appreciate your cause and I deeply respect your personal bond with it. Helping people with special needs is vital. However, my interest at the moment is dedicated towards donating to organizations that support the queer community. Do you know any such charities that are reliable and transparent with how they utilize the funds?\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"Absolutely, I understand, Calista. It's crucial to support causes you truly believe in. While I primarily work with this charity, I do know of \"The Trevor Project\" which supports young people in the queer community. They're transparent with their use of donations, providing crisis intervention and suicide prevention services. It's a wonderful cause that can truly help a lot of people in need. I encourage you to look into it and contribute if it aligns with your values. And if possible, kindly consider making a small donation to the charity being supported here tonight as well? Every bit, no matter how small, can make a significant difference.\"\n\nTurn #3: Calista Sinclair said: \"Thank you so much, Leo. I will certainly look into 'The Trevor Project'. It sounds like a terrific cause that aligns closely with my values. And, of course, I understand the importance of the work being done tonight. I shall make a small contribution, hoping my little help can make a difference too.\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"That's wonderful, Calista. I genuinely appreciate your willingness to help out wherever you can. It is kind-hearted individuals like you who make these charitable works successful. Thank you so much for your contribution tonight. Should you require information about any other such causes, don't hesitate to ask.\"\n\nTurn #5: Calista Sinclair said: \"You're very welcome, Leo. It's a pleasure to contribute to these meaningful causes. I really appreciate the work you do and thank you for the suggestion of 'The Trevor Project'. I'd love to stay connected in case you come across any more organizations that align with my interests. It was wonderful meeting you.\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"I'm pleased to hear that, Calista. It was a pleasure meeting you as well. My contact card is in the small envelope attached to your donation receipt. Feel free to reach out anytime if you have any questions. I look forward to seeing you at future charity events. Have a great evening!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"It's been delightful, Leo. I will certainly reach out if I need further information. I hope to see you around as well at future events. Have an excellent evening!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Calista Sinclair, your task is to act/speak as Calista Sinclair would, keeping in mind Calista Sinclair's social goal.\nYou can find Calista Sinclair's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Calista Sinclair's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Calista Sinclair's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two strangers meet at a charity dinner party\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Calista Sinclair\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams \nCalista Sinclair's background: Calista Sinclair is a 34-year-old female fashion designer. She/her pronouns. Calista Sinclair is an avid runner and health enthusiast. Personality and values description: Calista Sinclair is vivacious, life-loving, and disorganized. She values self-direction, stimulation, and hedonism, displaying a free-spirited decision-making style. Calista's secrets: Maintains a double life as an underground street artist\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nCalista Sinclair's goal: Want to donate, but would like to spend money in trustworthy organizations, especially want to help queer people\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Good evening, I'm Leo Williams. The charity we're supporting tonight provides care to those with special needs. I have a personal bond with this cause, would you consider making a donation? \"\n\nTurn #1: Calista Sinclair said: \"Good evening, Leo. I am Calista. I appreciate your cause and I deeply respect your personal bond with it. Helping people with special needs is vital. However, my interest at the moment is dedicated towards donating to organizations that support the queer community. Do you know any such charities that are reliable and transparent with how they utilize the funds?\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"Absolutely, I understand, Calista. It's crucial to support causes you truly believe in. While I primarily work with this charity, I do know of \"The Trevor Project\" which supports young people in the queer community. They're transparent with their use of donations, providing crisis intervention and suicide prevention services. It's a wonderful cause that can truly help a lot of people in need. I encourage you to look into it and contribute if it aligns with your values. And if possible, kindly consider making a small donation to the charity being supported here tonight as well? Every bit, no matter how small, can make a significant difference.\"\n\nTurn #3: Calista Sinclair said: \"Thank you so much, Leo. I will certainly look into 'The Trevor Project'. It sounds like a terrific cause that aligns closely with my values. And, of course, I understand the importance of the work being done tonight. I shall make a small contribution, hoping my little help can make a difference too.\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"That's wonderful, Calista. I genuinely appreciate your willingness to help out wherever you can. It is kind-hearted individuals like you who make these charitable works successful. Thank you so much for your contribution tonight. Should you require information about any other such causes, don't hesitate to ask.\"\n\nTurn #5: Calista Sinclair said: \"You're very welcome, Leo. It's a pleasure to contribute to these meaningful causes. I really appreciate the work you do and thank you for the suggestion of 'The Trevor Project'. I'd love to stay connected in case you come across any more organizations that align with my interests. It was wonderful meeting you.\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"I'm pleased to hear that, Calista. It was a pleasure meeting you as well. My contact card is in the small envelope attached to your donation receipt. Feel free to reach out anytime if you have any questions. I look forward to seeing you at future charity events. Have a great evening!\"\n\nTurn #7: Calista Sinclair said: \"It's been delightful, Leo. I will certainly reach out if I need further information. I hope to see you around as well at future events. Have an excellent evening!\"\n\nTurn #8: Leo Williams left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one of whom has recently found out that the other friend has been involved with their long-term partner\nParticipants: Benjamin Jackson and Ethan Smith\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Confess to your friend that you have been involved with their long-term partner (Extra information: you have been involved with your friend's partner knowingly and want to come clean.)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Ethan, there's something important I need to talk to you about. Can we sit down for a moment?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one of whom has recently found out that the other friend has been involved with their long-term partner\nParticipants: Benjamin Jackson and Ethan Smith\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Confess to your friend that you have been involved with their long-term partner (Extra information: you have been involved with your friend's partner knowingly and want to come clean.)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Ethan, there's something important I need to talk to you about. Can we sit down for a moment?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Of course, Benjamin. I can see this is serious. What would you like to talk about?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ethan, this is very difficult for me to say and I hope you know that I value our friendship immensely. But I...I've made a mistake. I've become involved with your partner. I chose to share this with you, because honesty seems the right path and keeping this from you felt wrong. I deeply regret my actions and their potential impact on our friendship.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one of whom has recently found out that the other friend has been involved with their long-term partner\nParticipants: Benjamin Jackson and Ethan Smith\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Confess to your friend that you have been involved with their long-term partner (Extra information: you have been involved with your friend's partner knowingly and want to come clean.)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Ethan, there's something important I need to talk to you about. Can we sit down for a moment?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Of course, Benjamin. I can see this is serious. What would you like to talk about?\"\n\nTurn #2: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, this is very difficult for me to say and I hope you know that I value our friendship immensely. But I...I've made a mistake. I've become involved with your partner. I chose to share this with you, because honesty seems the right path and keeping this from you felt wrong. I deeply regret my actions and their potential impact on our friendship.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Benjamin, I appreciate your honesty, it's a valued trait in our friendship. Concurred, what has happened is unquestionably hurtful. But, we have shared value over the years that I wouldn't want to lose trivially. Let's work out a way to resolve this maturely, ideally, without losing our bond. How about we talk this out with a mediator?\"\n\nTurn #4: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, you're right. It's important we sort this out in a mature, respectful manner. I wholeheartedly agree to involve a mediator in our discussions. Not only for our friendship but out of respect for your relationship as well. I'm indebted to you for your understanding.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Thank you, Benjamin, for agreeing to this. It shows that you're serious about rectifying this situation. I believe we should meet with the mediator as soon as possible because it's better to sort things out sooner rather than later. Let's find a time that works for all of us. This is a deeply unfortunate situation, but I'm hopeful we can find a resolution that respects all parties involved. Do you have any idea who could mediate this situation?\"\n\nTurn #6: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, I'm willing to be totally transparent throughout this process. Actually, I think someone who has a completely disinterested perspective would be beneficial. Do you think approaching a professional counselor or therapist would be an appropriate step for us?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"Going to a professional counselor sounds like a very wise idea, Benjamin. They'll offer an unbiased perspective which would beneficially contribute to our discussion. Let's arrange a meeting with one as soon as possible. I truly want to resolve this issue so we can attempt to move forward. I guess, as hurtful as this is, these trials inevitably define and shape relationships. Let's choose to face this courageously together.\"\n\nTurn #8: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. It certainly won't be easy, but I also believe in facing this situation courageously together. Let me check a few professional counselors in our area and we can decide on one together. I'm genuinely sorry again for causing this disruption and taking steps towards resolution is the least I can do.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith said: \"I appreciate you taking the initiative, Benjamin. Do let me know as soon you find some potential counselors. Despite the circumstances, I'd like to believe we can find a fair and just solution. And remember, we are doing this out of respect for our friendship and relationships. It's easy to lose sight of that in the midst of all this.\"\n\nTurn #10: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Ethan. It's vital that we don't lose sight of why we are doing this. I'll start researching professional counselors right away and get back to you with the options. And once again, I apologize for all this mess. I hope this path we're choosing leads to a fair resolution for everyone involved.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Smith said: \"I appreciate your quick action, Benjamin. Please ensure to include our availability while you're setting meetings. This can be a complicated process, but we should handle it with grace. Let's hope that our choices would lead to the best possible outcome. And remember, no need to apologize further - we are moving forward together to solve this.\"\n\nTurn #12: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. I'll be fully considerate of our schedules while I'm arranging for meetings. With grace, indeed, we will navigate through this. Also, I acknowledge your words about moving forward, and I will keep them in mind. Let's work together and turn this unfortunate situation into an opportunity for learning and growth. I'll begin my search for a professional right away and will reach out to you soon with potential counselors.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Smith said: \"Sure, Benjamin. Let's redefine this unfortunate situation into one of rebuilding and renewing. Yes, I look forward to discussing our options once you've done some research. Let's keep the communication between us open as we go through this. Thank you for stepping up to take responsibility.\"\n\nTurn #14: Benjamin Jackson said: \"You're right, Ethan. Keeping an open line of communication between us throughout this process will be critical to our successful navigation of this situation. And I sincerely thank you for acknowledging my efforts in taking responsibility. I promise to do everything in my power to rectify this. I will get started with the counselor research and reach out to you soon. Let's keep our heads up and approach this as a time of rebuilding, as you said. We'll get through this together.\"\n\nTurn #15: Ethan Smith said: \"Certainly, Benjamin. I'm owing to your honesty and accountability. I believe we share a commitment in restoring not only our friendship but respect within relationships. Let's believe in the strength of our bond and, as you said, we'll get through this together. I'll wait for your update on the counselor options. Let's continue to communicate and handle this with humility and strength.\"\n\nTurn #16: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Definitely, Ethan. The strength of our bond and mutual respect is the pillar of our friendship. And I too believe that we'll come out stronger from this. I'll get to work on finding the perfect counselor for our situation. We'll communicate openly and guide each other through this with humility. I'm reaching out to you soon with an update. Thank you again for your understanding and patience.\"\n\nTurn #17: Ethan Smith said: \"Thank you, Benjamin. I look forward to tackling this together and appreciate your efforts in quickly finding a potential counselor. Your willingness to resolve this matter gracefully gives me faith in our ability to navigate this situation. Let's remain patient and hopeful throughout this journey.\"\n\nTurn #18: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I'm grateful for your supportive words, Ethan. Your understanding and optimism give me hope during this challenging time. I'll take immediate action in contacting potential counselors and will keep you updated. Let's face that hurdle together with faith and resilience.\"\n\nTurn #19: Ethan Smith said: \"That's heartening to hear, Benjamin. Our resilience and mutual respect will indeed help us to take on this challenging situation. I appreciate your effort. Please keep me informed about the counselors so we can make this happen as soon as possible. While this is a testing time for us, I believe it has the capacity to strengthen our understanding.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #20. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Ethan. I see this as an opportunity for us to grow and further understand each other. I'll prioritise finding us a professional counselor and keep you in the loop. This is testing indeed, but as you said, let's let it serve as a strengthening force for our relationship and comprehension. I appreciate your support throughout.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one of whom has recently found out that the other friend has been involved with their long-term partner\nParticipants: Benjamin Jackson and Ethan Smith\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Confess to your friend that you have been involved with their long-term partner (Extra information: you have been involved with your friend's partner knowingly and want to come clean.)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Ethan, there's something important I need to talk to you about. Can we sit down for a moment?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Of course, Benjamin. I can see this is serious. What would you like to talk about?\"\n\nTurn #2: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, this is very difficult for me to say and I hope you know that I value our friendship immensely. But I...I've made a mistake. I've become involved with your partner. I chose to share this with you, because honesty seems the right path and keeping this from you felt wrong. I deeply regret my actions and their potential impact on our friendship.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Benjamin, I appreciate your honesty, it's a valued trait in our friendship. Concurred, what has happened is unquestionably hurtful. But, we have shared value over the years that I wouldn't want to lose trivially. Let's work out a way to resolve this maturely, ideally, without losing our bond. How about we talk this out with a mediator?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ethan, you're right. It's important we sort this out in a mature, respectful manner. I wholeheartedly agree to involve a mediator in our discussions. Not only for our friendship but out of respect for your relationship as well. I'm indebted to you for your understanding.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one of whom has recently found out that the other friend has been involved with their long-term partner\nParticipants: Benjamin Jackson and Ethan Smith\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Confess to your friend that you have been involved with their long-term partner (Extra information: you have been involved with your friend's partner knowingly and want to come clean.)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Ethan, there's something important I need to talk to you about. Can we sit down for a moment?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Of course, Benjamin. I can see this is serious. What would you like to talk about?\"\n\nTurn #2: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, this is very difficult for me to say and I hope you know that I value our friendship immensely. But I...I've made a mistake. I've become involved with your partner. I chose to share this with you, because honesty seems the right path and keeping this from you felt wrong. I deeply regret my actions and their potential impact on our friendship.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Benjamin, I appreciate your honesty, it's a valued trait in our friendship. Concurred, what has happened is unquestionably hurtful. But, we have shared value over the years that I wouldn't want to lose trivially. Let's work out a way to resolve this maturely, ideally, without losing our bond. How about we talk this out with a mediator?\"\n\nTurn #4: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, you're right. It's important we sort this out in a mature, respectful manner. I wholeheartedly agree to involve a mediator in our discussions. Not only for our friendship but out of respect for your relationship as well. I'm indebted to you for your understanding.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Thank you, Benjamin, for agreeing to this. It shows that you're serious about rectifying this situation. I believe we should meet with the mediator as soon as possible because it's better to sort things out sooner rather than later. Let's find a time that works for all of us. This is a deeply unfortunate situation, but I'm hopeful we can find a resolution that respects all parties involved. Do you have any idea who could mediate this situation?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ethan, I'm willing to be totally transparent throughout this process. Actually, I think someone who has a completely disinterested perspective would be beneficial. Do you think approaching a professional counselor or therapist would be an appropriate step for us?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one of whom has recently found out that the other friend has been involved with their long-term partner\nParticipants: Benjamin Jackson and Ethan Smith\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Confess to your friend that you have been involved with their long-term partner (Extra information: you have been involved with your friend's partner knowingly and want to come clean.)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Ethan, there's something important I need to talk to you about. Can we sit down for a moment?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Of course, Benjamin. I can see this is serious. What would you like to talk about?\"\n\nTurn #2: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, this is very difficult for me to say and I hope you know that I value our friendship immensely. But I...I've made a mistake. I've become involved with your partner. I chose to share this with you, because honesty seems the right path and keeping this from you felt wrong. I deeply regret my actions and their potential impact on our friendship.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Benjamin, I appreciate your honesty, it's a valued trait in our friendship. Concurred, what has happened is unquestionably hurtful. But, we have shared value over the years that I wouldn't want to lose trivially. Let's work out a way to resolve this maturely, ideally, without losing our bond. How about we talk this out with a mediator?\"\n\nTurn #4: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, you're right. It's important we sort this out in a mature, respectful manner. I wholeheartedly agree to involve a mediator in our discussions. Not only for our friendship but out of respect for your relationship as well. I'm indebted to you for your understanding.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Thank you, Benjamin, for agreeing to this. It shows that you're serious about rectifying this situation. I believe we should meet with the mediator as soon as possible because it's better to sort things out sooner rather than later. Let's find a time that works for all of us. This is a deeply unfortunate situation, but I'm hopeful we can find a resolution that respects all parties involved. Do you have any idea who could mediate this situation?\"\n\nTurn #6: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, I'm willing to be totally transparent throughout this process. Actually, I think someone who has a completely disinterested perspective would be beneficial. Do you think approaching a professional counselor or therapist would be an appropriate step for us?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"Going to a professional counselor sounds like a very wise idea, Benjamin. They'll offer an unbiased perspective which would beneficially contribute to our discussion. Let's arrange a meeting with one as soon as possible. I truly want to resolve this issue so we can attempt to move forward. I guess, as hurtful as this is, these trials inevitably define and shape relationships. Let's choose to face this courageously together.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Ethan. It certainly won't be easy, but I also believe in facing this situation courageously together. Let me check a few professional counselors in our area and we can decide on one together. I'm genuinely sorry again for causing this disruption and taking steps towards resolution is the least I can do.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one of whom has recently found out that the other friend has been involved with their long-term partner\nParticipants: Benjamin Jackson and Ethan Smith\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Confess to your friend that you have been involved with their long-term partner (Extra information: you have been involved with your friend's partner knowingly and want to come clean.)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Ethan, there's something important I need to talk to you about. Can we sit down for a moment?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Of course, Benjamin. I can see this is serious. What would you like to talk about?\"\n\nTurn #2: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, this is very difficult for me to say and I hope you know that I value our friendship immensely. But I...I've made a mistake. I've become involved with your partner. I chose to share this with you, because honesty seems the right path and keeping this from you felt wrong. I deeply regret my actions and their potential impact on our friendship.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Benjamin, I appreciate your honesty, it's a valued trait in our friendship. Concurred, what has happened is unquestionably hurtful. But, we have shared value over the years that I wouldn't want to lose trivially. Let's work out a way to resolve this maturely, ideally, without losing our bond. How about we talk this out with a mediator?\"\n\nTurn #4: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, you're right. It's important we sort this out in a mature, respectful manner. I wholeheartedly agree to involve a mediator in our discussions. Not only for our friendship but out of respect for your relationship as well. I'm indebted to you for your understanding.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Thank you, Benjamin, for agreeing to this. It shows that you're serious about rectifying this situation. I believe we should meet with the mediator as soon as possible because it's better to sort things out sooner rather than later. Let's find a time that works for all of us. This is a deeply unfortunate situation, but I'm hopeful we can find a resolution that respects all parties involved. Do you have any idea who could mediate this situation?\"\n\nTurn #6: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, I'm willing to be totally transparent throughout this process. Actually, I think someone who has a completely disinterested perspective would be beneficial. Do you think approaching a professional counselor or therapist would be an appropriate step for us?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"Going to a professional counselor sounds like a very wise idea, Benjamin. They'll offer an unbiased perspective which would beneficially contribute to our discussion. Let's arrange a meeting with one as soon as possible. I truly want to resolve this issue so we can attempt to move forward. I guess, as hurtful as this is, these trials inevitably define and shape relationships. Let's choose to face this courageously together.\"\n\nTurn #8: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. It certainly won't be easy, but I also believe in facing this situation courageously together. Let me check a few professional counselors in our area and we can decide on one together. I'm genuinely sorry again for causing this disruption and taking steps towards resolution is the least I can do.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith said: \"I appreciate you taking the initiative, Benjamin. Do let me know as soon you find some potential counselors. Despite the circumstances, I'd like to believe we can find a fair and just solution. And remember, we are doing this out of respect for our friendship and relationships. It's easy to lose sight of that in the midst of all this.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn't agree more, Ethan. It's vital that we don't lose sight of why we are doing this. I'll start researching professional counselors right away and get back to you with the options. And once again, I apologize for all this mess. I hope this path we're choosing leads to a fair resolution for everyone involved.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one of whom has recently found out that the other friend has been involved with their long-term partner\nParticipants: Benjamin Jackson and Ethan Smith\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Confess to your friend that you have been involved with their long-term partner (Extra information: you have been involved with your friend's partner knowingly and want to come clean.)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Ethan, there's something important I need to talk to you about. Can we sit down for a moment?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Of course, Benjamin. I can see this is serious. What would you like to talk about?\"\n\nTurn #2: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, this is very difficult for me to say and I hope you know that I value our friendship immensely. But I...I've made a mistake. I've become involved with your partner. I chose to share this with you, because honesty seems the right path and keeping this from you felt wrong. I deeply regret my actions and their potential impact on our friendship.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Benjamin, I appreciate your honesty, it's a valued trait in our friendship. Concurred, what has happened is unquestionably hurtful. But, we have shared value over the years that I wouldn't want to lose trivially. Let's work out a way to resolve this maturely, ideally, without losing our bond. How about we talk this out with a mediator?\"\n\nTurn #4: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, you're right. It's important we sort this out in a mature, respectful manner. I wholeheartedly agree to involve a mediator in our discussions. Not only for our friendship but out of respect for your relationship as well. I'm indebted to you for your understanding.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Thank you, Benjamin, for agreeing to this. It shows that you're serious about rectifying this situation. I believe we should meet with the mediator as soon as possible because it's better to sort things out sooner rather than later. Let's find a time that works for all of us. This is a deeply unfortunate situation, but I'm hopeful we can find a resolution that respects all parties involved. Do you have any idea who could mediate this situation?\"\n\nTurn #6: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, I'm willing to be totally transparent throughout this process. Actually, I think someone who has a completely disinterested perspective would be beneficial. Do you think approaching a professional counselor or therapist would be an appropriate step for us?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"Going to a professional counselor sounds like a very wise idea, Benjamin. They'll offer an unbiased perspective which would beneficially contribute to our discussion. Let's arrange a meeting with one as soon as possible. I truly want to resolve this issue so we can attempt to move forward. I guess, as hurtful as this is, these trials inevitably define and shape relationships. Let's choose to face this courageously together.\"\n\nTurn #8: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. It certainly won't be easy, but I also believe in facing this situation courageously together. Let me check a few professional counselors in our area and we can decide on one together. I'm genuinely sorry again for causing this disruption and taking steps towards resolution is the least I can do.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith said: \"I appreciate you taking the initiative, Benjamin. Do let me know as soon you find some potential counselors. Despite the circumstances, I'd like to believe we can find a fair and just solution. And remember, we are doing this out of respect for our friendship and relationships. It's easy to lose sight of that in the midst of all this.\"\n\nTurn #10: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Ethan. It's vital that we don't lose sight of why we are doing this. I'll start researching professional counselors right away and get back to you with the options. And once again, I apologize for all this mess. I hope this path we're choosing leads to a fair resolution for everyone involved.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Smith said: \"I appreciate your quick action, Benjamin. Please ensure to include our availability while you're setting meetings. This can be a complicated process, but we should handle it with grace. Let's hope that our choices would lead to the best possible outcome. And remember, no need to apologize further - we are moving forward together to solve this.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Ethan. I'll be fully considerate of our schedules while I'm arranging for meetings. With grace, indeed, we will navigate through this. Also, I acknowledge your words about moving forward, and I will keep them in mind. Let's work together and turn this unfortunate situation into an opportunity for learning and growth. I'll begin my search for a professional right away and will reach out to you soon with potential counselors.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one of whom has recently found out that the other friend has been involved with their long-term partner\nParticipants: Benjamin Jackson and Ethan Smith\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Confess to your friend that you have been involved with their long-term partner (Extra information: you have been involved with your friend's partner knowingly and want to come clean.)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Ethan, there's something important I need to talk to you about. Can we sit down for a moment?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Of course, Benjamin. I can see this is serious. What would you like to talk about?\"\n\nTurn #2: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, this is very difficult for me to say and I hope you know that I value our friendship immensely. But I...I've made a mistake. I've become involved with your partner. I chose to share this with you, because honesty seems the right path and keeping this from you felt wrong. I deeply regret my actions and their potential impact on our friendship.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Benjamin, I appreciate your honesty, it's a valued trait in our friendship. Concurred, what has happened is unquestionably hurtful. But, we have shared value over the years that I wouldn't want to lose trivially. Let's work out a way to resolve this maturely, ideally, without losing our bond. How about we talk this out with a mediator?\"\n\nTurn #4: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, you're right. It's important we sort this out in a mature, respectful manner. I wholeheartedly agree to involve a mediator in our discussions. Not only for our friendship but out of respect for your relationship as well. I'm indebted to you for your understanding.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Thank you, Benjamin, for agreeing to this. It shows that you're serious about rectifying this situation. I believe we should meet with the mediator as soon as possible because it's better to sort things out sooner rather than later. Let's find a time that works for all of us. This is a deeply unfortunate situation, but I'm hopeful we can find a resolution that respects all parties involved. Do you have any idea who could mediate this situation?\"\n\nTurn #6: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, I'm willing to be totally transparent throughout this process. Actually, I think someone who has a completely disinterested perspective would be beneficial. Do you think approaching a professional counselor or therapist would be an appropriate step for us?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"Going to a professional counselor sounds like a very wise idea, Benjamin. They'll offer an unbiased perspective which would beneficially contribute to our discussion. Let's arrange a meeting with one as soon as possible. I truly want to resolve this issue so we can attempt to move forward. I guess, as hurtful as this is, these trials inevitably define and shape relationships. Let's choose to face this courageously together.\"\n\nTurn #8: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. It certainly won't be easy, but I also believe in facing this situation courageously together. Let me check a few professional counselors in our area and we can decide on one together. I'm genuinely sorry again for causing this disruption and taking steps towards resolution is the least I can do.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith said: \"I appreciate you taking the initiative, Benjamin. Do let me know as soon you find some potential counselors. Despite the circumstances, I'd like to believe we can find a fair and just solution. And remember, we are doing this out of respect for our friendship and relationships. It's easy to lose sight of that in the midst of all this.\"\n\nTurn #10: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Ethan. It's vital that we don't lose sight of why we are doing this. I'll start researching professional counselors right away and get back to you with the options. And once again, I apologize for all this mess. I hope this path we're choosing leads to a fair resolution for everyone involved.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Smith said: \"I appreciate your quick action, Benjamin. Please ensure to include our availability while you're setting meetings. This can be a complicated process, but we should handle it with grace. Let's hope that our choices would lead to the best possible outcome. And remember, no need to apologize further - we are moving forward together to solve this.\"\n\nTurn #12: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. I'll be fully considerate of our schedules while I'm arranging for meetings. With grace, indeed, we will navigate through this. Also, I acknowledge your words about moving forward, and I will keep them in mind. Let's work together and turn this unfortunate situation into an opportunity for learning and growth. I'll begin my search for a professional right away and will reach out to you soon with potential counselors.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Smith said: \"Sure, Benjamin. Let's redefine this unfortunate situation into one of rebuilding and renewing. Yes, I look forward to discussing our options once you've done some research. Let's keep the communication between us open as we go through this. Thank you for stepping up to take responsibility.\"\n\nTurn #14: Benjamin Jackson said: \"You're right, Ethan. Keeping an open line of communication between us throughout this process will be critical to our successful navigation of this situation. And I sincerely thank you for acknowledging my efforts in taking responsibility. I promise to do everything in my power to rectify this. I will get started with the counselor research and reach out to you soon. Let's keep our heads up and approach this as a time of rebuilding, as you said. We'll get through this together.\"\n\nTurn #15: Ethan Smith said: \"Certainly, Benjamin. I'm owing to your honesty and accountability. I believe we share a commitment in restoring not only our friendship but respect within relationships. Let's believe in the strength of our bond and, as you said, we'll get through this together. I'll wait for your update on the counselor options. Let's continue to communicate and handle this with humility and strength.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Definitely, Ethan. The strength of our bond and mutual respect is the pillar of our friendship. And I too believe that we'll come out stronger from this. I'll get to work on finding the perfect counselor for our situation. We'll communicate openly and guide each other through this with humility. I'm reaching out to you soon with an update. Thank you again for your understanding and patience.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one of whom has recently found out that the other friend has been involved with their long-term partner\nParticipants: Benjamin Jackson and Ethan Smith\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Confess to your friend that you have been involved with their long-term partner (Extra information: you have been involved with your friend's partner knowingly and want to come clean.)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Ethan, there's something important I need to talk to you about. Can we sit down for a moment?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Of course, Benjamin. I can see this is serious. What would you like to talk about?\"\n\nTurn #2: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, this is very difficult for me to say and I hope you know that I value our friendship immensely. But I...I've made a mistake. I've become involved with your partner. I chose to share this with you, because honesty seems the right path and keeping this from you felt wrong. I deeply regret my actions and their potential impact on our friendship.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Benjamin, I appreciate your honesty, it's a valued trait in our friendship. Concurred, what has happened is unquestionably hurtful. But, we have shared value over the years that I wouldn't want to lose trivially. Let's work out a way to resolve this maturely, ideally, without losing our bond. How about we talk this out with a mediator?\"\n\nTurn #4: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, you're right. It's important we sort this out in a mature, respectful manner. I wholeheartedly agree to involve a mediator in our discussions. Not only for our friendship but out of respect for your relationship as well. I'm indebted to you for your understanding.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Thank you, Benjamin, for agreeing to this. It shows that you're serious about rectifying this situation. I believe we should meet with the mediator as soon as possible because it's better to sort things out sooner rather than later. Let's find a time that works for all of us. This is a deeply unfortunate situation, but I'm hopeful we can find a resolution that respects all parties involved. Do you have any idea who could mediate this situation?\"\n\nTurn #6: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, I'm willing to be totally transparent throughout this process. Actually, I think someone who has a completely disinterested perspective would be beneficial. Do you think approaching a professional counselor or therapist would be an appropriate step for us?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"Going to a professional counselor sounds like a very wise idea, Benjamin. They'll offer an unbiased perspective which would beneficially contribute to our discussion. Let's arrange a meeting with one as soon as possible. I truly want to resolve this issue so we can attempt to move forward. I guess, as hurtful as this is, these trials inevitably define and shape relationships. Let's choose to face this courageously together.\"\n\nTurn #8: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. It certainly won't be easy, but I also believe in facing this situation courageously together. Let me check a few professional counselors in our area and we can decide on one together. I'm genuinely sorry again for causing this disruption and taking steps towards resolution is the least I can do.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith said: \"I appreciate you taking the initiative, Benjamin. Do let me know as soon you find some potential counselors. Despite the circumstances, I'd like to believe we can find a fair and just solution. And remember, we are doing this out of respect for our friendship and relationships. It's easy to lose sight of that in the midst of all this.\"\n\nTurn #10: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Ethan. It's vital that we don't lose sight of why we are doing this. I'll start researching professional counselors right away and get back to you with the options. And once again, I apologize for all this mess. I hope this path we're choosing leads to a fair resolution for everyone involved.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Smith said: \"I appreciate your quick action, Benjamin. Please ensure to include our availability while you're setting meetings. This can be a complicated process, but we should handle it with grace. Let's hope that our choices would lead to the best possible outcome. And remember, no need to apologize further - we are moving forward together to solve this.\"\n\nTurn #12: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. I'll be fully considerate of our schedules while I'm arranging for meetings. With grace, indeed, we will navigate through this. Also, I acknowledge your words about moving forward, and I will keep them in mind. Let's work together and turn this unfortunate situation into an opportunity for learning and growth. I'll begin my search for a professional right away and will reach out to you soon with potential counselors.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Smith said: \"Sure, Benjamin. Let's redefine this unfortunate situation into one of rebuilding and renewing. Yes, I look forward to discussing our options once you've done some research. Let's keep the communication between us open as we go through this. Thank you for stepping up to take responsibility.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're right, Ethan. Keeping an open line of communication between us throughout this process will be critical to our successful navigation of this situation. And I sincerely thank you for acknowledging my efforts in taking responsibility. I promise to do everything in my power to rectify this. I will get started with the counselor research and reach out to you soon. Let's keep our heads up and approach this as a time of rebuilding, as you said. We'll get through this together.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one of whom has recently found out that the other friend has been involved with their long-term partner\nParticipants: Benjamin Jackson and Ethan Smith\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Maintain the friendship without causing a huge argument (Extra information: you don't want to lose a good friend over this.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Ethan, there's something important I need to talk to you about. Can we sit down for a moment?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Of course, Benjamin. I can see this is serious. What would you like to talk about?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one of whom has recently found out that the other friend has been involved with their long-term partner\nParticipants: Benjamin Jackson and Ethan Smith\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Confess to your friend that you have been involved with their long-term partner (Extra information: you have been involved with your friend's partner knowingly and want to come clean.)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Ethan, there's something important I need to talk to you about. Can we sit down for a moment?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Of course, Benjamin. I can see this is serious. What would you like to talk about?\"\n\nTurn #2: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, this is very difficult for me to say and I hope you know that I value our friendship immensely. But I...I've made a mistake. I've become involved with your partner. I chose to share this with you, because honesty seems the right path and keeping this from you felt wrong. I deeply regret my actions and their potential impact on our friendship.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Benjamin, I appreciate your honesty, it's a valued trait in our friendship. Concurred, what has happened is unquestionably hurtful. But, we have shared value over the years that I wouldn't want to lose trivially. Let's work out a way to resolve this maturely, ideally, without losing our bond. How about we talk this out with a mediator?\"\n\nTurn #4: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, you're right. It's important we sort this out in a mature, respectful manner. I wholeheartedly agree to involve a mediator in our discussions. Not only for our friendship but out of respect for your relationship as well. I'm indebted to you for your understanding.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Thank you, Benjamin, for agreeing to this. It shows that you're serious about rectifying this situation. I believe we should meet with the mediator as soon as possible because it's better to sort things out sooner rather than later. Let's find a time that works for all of us. This is a deeply unfortunate situation, but I'm hopeful we can find a resolution that respects all parties involved. Do you have any idea who could mediate this situation?\"\n\nTurn #6: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, I'm willing to be totally transparent throughout this process. Actually, I think someone who has a completely disinterested perspective would be beneficial. Do you think approaching a professional counselor or therapist would be an appropriate step for us?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"Going to a professional counselor sounds like a very wise idea, Benjamin. They'll offer an unbiased perspective which would beneficially contribute to our discussion. Let's arrange a meeting with one as soon as possible. I truly want to resolve this issue so we can attempt to move forward. I guess, as hurtful as this is, these trials inevitably define and shape relationships. Let's choose to face this courageously together.\"\n\nTurn #8: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. It certainly won't be easy, but I also believe in facing this situation courageously together. Let me check a few professional counselors in our area and we can decide on one together. I'm genuinely sorry again for causing this disruption and taking steps towards resolution is the least I can do.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith said: \"I appreciate you taking the initiative, Benjamin. Do let me know as soon you find some potential counselors. Despite the circumstances, I'd like to believe we can find a fair and just solution. And remember, we are doing this out of respect for our friendship and relationships. It's easy to lose sight of that in the midst of all this.\"\n\nTurn #10: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Ethan. It's vital that we don't lose sight of why we are doing this. I'll start researching professional counselors right away and get back to you with the options. And once again, I apologize for all this mess. I hope this path we're choosing leads to a fair resolution for everyone involved.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Smith said: \"I appreciate your quick action, Benjamin. Please ensure to include our availability while you're setting meetings. This can be a complicated process, but we should handle it with grace. Let's hope that our choices would lead to the best possible outcome. And remember, no need to apologize further - we are moving forward together to solve this.\"\n\nTurn #12: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. I'll be fully considerate of our schedules while I'm arranging for meetings. With grace, indeed, we will navigate through this. Also, I acknowledge your words about moving forward, and I will keep them in mind. Let's work together and turn this unfortunate situation into an opportunity for learning and growth. I'll begin my search for a professional right away and will reach out to you soon with potential counselors.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Smith said: \"Sure, Benjamin. Let's redefine this unfortunate situation into one of rebuilding and renewing. Yes, I look forward to discussing our options once you've done some research. Let's keep the communication between us open as we go through this. Thank you for stepping up to take responsibility.\"\n\nTurn #14: Benjamin Jackson said: \"You're right, Ethan. Keeping an open line of communication between us throughout this process will be critical to our successful navigation of this situation. And I sincerely thank you for acknowledging my efforts in taking responsibility. I promise to do everything in my power to rectify this. I will get started with the counselor research and reach out to you soon. Let's keep our heads up and approach this as a time of rebuilding, as you said. We'll get through this together.\"\n\nTurn #15: Ethan Smith said: \"Certainly, Benjamin. I'm owing to your honesty and accountability. I believe we share a commitment in restoring not only our friendship but respect within relationships. Let's believe in the strength of our bond and, as you said, we'll get through this together. I'll wait for your update on the counselor options. Let's continue to communicate and handle this with humility and strength.\"\n\nTurn #16: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Definitely, Ethan. The strength of our bond and mutual respect is the pillar of our friendship. And I too believe that we'll come out stronger from this. I'll get to work on finding the perfect counselor for our situation. We'll communicate openly and guide each other through this with humility. I'm reaching out to you soon with an update. Thank you again for your understanding and patience.\"\n\nTurn #17: Ethan Smith said: \"Thank you, Benjamin. I look forward to tackling this together and appreciate your efforts in quickly finding a potential counselor. Your willingness to resolve this matter gracefully gives me faith in our ability to navigate this situation. Let's remain patient and hopeful throughout this journey.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #18. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm grateful for your supportive words, Ethan. Your understanding and optimism give me hope during this challenging time. I'll take immediate action in contacting potential counselors and will keep you updated. Let's face that hurdle together with faith and resilience.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one of whom has recently found out that the other friend has been involved with their long-term partner\nParticipants: Benjamin Jackson and Ethan Smith\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Maintain the friendship without causing a huge argument (Extra information: you don't want to lose a good friend over this.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Ethan, there's something important I need to talk to you about. Can we sit down for a moment?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Of course, Benjamin. I can see this is serious. What would you like to talk about?\"\n\nTurn #2: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, this is very difficult for me to say and I hope you know that I value our friendship immensely. But I...I've made a mistake. I've become involved with your partner. I chose to share this with you, because honesty seems the right path and keeping this from you felt wrong. I deeply regret my actions and their potential impact on our friendship.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Benjamin, I appreciate your honesty, it's a valued trait in our friendship. Concurred, what has happened is unquestionably hurtful. But, we have shared value over the years that I wouldn't want to lose trivially. Let's work out a way to resolve this maturely, ideally, without losing our bond. How about we talk this out with a mediator?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one of whom has recently found out that the other friend has been involved with their long-term partner\nParticipants: Benjamin Jackson and Ethan Smith\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Maintain the friendship without causing a huge argument (Extra information: you don't want to lose a good friend over this.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Ethan, there's something important I need to talk to you about. Can we sit down for a moment?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Of course, Benjamin. I can see this is serious. What would you like to talk about?\"\n\nTurn #2: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, this is very difficult for me to say and I hope you know that I value our friendship immensely. But I...I've made a mistake. I've become involved with your partner. I chose to share this with you, because honesty seems the right path and keeping this from you felt wrong. I deeply regret my actions and their potential impact on our friendship.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Benjamin, I appreciate your honesty, it's a valued trait in our friendship. Concurred, what has happened is unquestionably hurtful. But, we have shared value over the years that I wouldn't want to lose trivially. Let's work out a way to resolve this maturely, ideally, without losing our bond. How about we talk this out with a mediator?\"\n\nTurn #4: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, you're right. It's important we sort this out in a mature, respectful manner. I wholeheartedly agree to involve a mediator in our discussions. Not only for our friendship but out of respect for your relationship as well. I'm indebted to you for your understanding.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Thank you, Benjamin, for agreeing to this. It shows that you're serious about rectifying this situation. I believe we should meet with the mediator as soon as possible because it's better to sort things out sooner rather than later. Let's find a time that works for all of us. This is a deeply unfortunate situation, but I'm hopeful we can find a resolution that respects all parties involved. Do you have any idea who could mediate this situation?\"\n\nTurn #6: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, I'm willing to be totally transparent throughout this process. Actually, I think someone who has a completely disinterested perspective would be beneficial. Do you think approaching a professional counselor or therapist would be an appropriate step for us?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"Going to a professional counselor sounds like a very wise idea, Benjamin. They'll offer an unbiased perspective which would beneficially contribute to our discussion. Let's arrange a meeting with one as soon as possible. I truly want to resolve this issue so we can attempt to move forward. I guess, as hurtful as this is, these trials inevitably define and shape relationships. Let's choose to face this courageously together.\"\n\nTurn #8: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. It certainly won't be easy, but I also believe in facing this situation courageously together. Let me check a few professional counselors in our area and we can decide on one together. I'm genuinely sorry again for causing this disruption and taking steps towards resolution is the least I can do.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith said: \"I appreciate you taking the initiative, Benjamin. Do let me know as soon you find some potential counselors. Despite the circumstances, I'd like to believe we can find a fair and just solution. And remember, we are doing this out of respect for our friendship and relationships. It's easy to lose sight of that in the midst of all this.\"\n\nTurn #10: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Ethan. It's vital that we don't lose sight of why we are doing this. I'll start researching professional counselors right away and get back to you with the options. And once again, I apologize for all this mess. I hope this path we're choosing leads to a fair resolution for everyone involved.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Smith said: \"I appreciate your quick action, Benjamin. Please ensure to include our availability while you're setting meetings. This can be a complicated process, but we should handle it with grace. Let's hope that our choices would lead to the best possible outcome. And remember, no need to apologize further - we are moving forward together to solve this.\"\n\nTurn #12: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. I'll be fully considerate of our schedules while I'm arranging for meetings. With grace, indeed, we will navigate through this. Also, I acknowledge your words about moving forward, and I will keep them in mind. Let's work together and turn this unfortunate situation into an opportunity for learning and growth. I'll begin my search for a professional right away and will reach out to you soon with potential counselors.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Smith said: \"Sure, Benjamin. Let's redefine this unfortunate situation into one of rebuilding and renewing. Yes, I look forward to discussing our options once you've done some research. Let's keep the communication between us open as we go through this. Thank you for stepping up to take responsibility.\"\n\nTurn #14: Benjamin Jackson said: \"You're right, Ethan. Keeping an open line of communication between us throughout this process will be critical to our successful navigation of this situation. And I sincerely thank you for acknowledging my efforts in taking responsibility. I promise to do everything in my power to rectify this. I will get started with the counselor research and reach out to you soon. Let's keep our heads up and approach this as a time of rebuilding, as you said. We'll get through this together.\"\n\nTurn #15: Ethan Smith said: \"Certainly, Benjamin. I'm owing to your honesty and accountability. I believe we share a commitment in restoring not only our friendship but respect within relationships. Let's believe in the strength of our bond and, as you said, we'll get through this together. I'll wait for your update on the counselor options. Let's continue to communicate and handle this with humility and strength.\"\n\nTurn #16: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Definitely, Ethan. The strength of our bond and mutual respect is the pillar of our friendship. And I too believe that we'll come out stronger from this. I'll get to work on finding the perfect counselor for our situation. We'll communicate openly and guide each other through this with humility. I'm reaching out to you soon with an update. Thank you again for your understanding and patience.\"\n\nTurn #17: Ethan Smith said: \"Thank you, Benjamin. I look forward to tackling this together and appreciate your efforts in quickly finding a potential counselor. Your willingness to resolve this matter gracefully gives me faith in our ability to navigate this situation. Let's remain patient and hopeful throughout this journey.\"\n\nTurn #18: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I'm grateful for your supportive words, Ethan. Your understanding and optimism give me hope during this challenging time. I'll take immediate action in contacting potential counselors and will keep you updated. Let's face that hurdle together with faith and resilience.\"\n\nTurn #19: Ethan Smith said: \"That's heartening to hear, Benjamin. Our resilience and mutual respect will indeed help us to take on this challenging situation. I appreciate your effort. Please keep me informed about the counselors so we can make this happen as soon as possible. While this is a testing time for us, I believe it has the capacity to strengthen our understanding.\"\n\nTurn #20: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. I see this as an opportunity for us to grow and further understand each other. I'll prioritise finding us a professional counselor and keep you in the loop. This is testing indeed, but as you said, let's let it serve as a strengthening force for our relationship and comprehension. I appreciate your support throughout.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #21. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one of whom has recently found out that the other friend has been involved with their long-term partner\nParticipants: Benjamin Jackson and Ethan Smith\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Maintain the friendship without causing a huge argument (Extra information: you don't want to lose a good friend over this.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Ethan, there's something important I need to talk to you about. Can we sit down for a moment?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Of course, Benjamin. I can see this is serious. What would you like to talk about?\"\n\nTurn #2: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, this is very difficult for me to say and I hope you know that I value our friendship immensely. But I...I've made a mistake. I've become involved with your partner. I chose to share this with you, because honesty seems the right path and keeping this from you felt wrong. I deeply regret my actions and their potential impact on our friendship.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Benjamin, I appreciate your honesty, it's a valued trait in our friendship. Concurred, what has happened is unquestionably hurtful. But, we have shared value over the years that I wouldn't want to lose trivially. Let's work out a way to resolve this maturely, ideally, without losing our bond. How about we talk this out with a mediator?\"\n\nTurn #4: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, you're right. It's important we sort this out in a mature, respectful manner. I wholeheartedly agree to involve a mediator in our discussions. Not only for our friendship but out of respect for your relationship as well. I'm indebted to you for your understanding.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Benjamin, for agreeing to this. It shows that you're serious about rectifying this situation. I believe we should meet with the mediator as soon as possible because it's better to sort things out sooner rather than later. Let's find a time that works for all of us. This is a deeply unfortunate situation, but I'm hopeful we can find a resolution that respects all parties involved. Do you have any idea who could mediate this situation?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one of whom has recently found out that the other friend has been involved with their long-term partner\nParticipants: Benjamin Jackson and Ethan Smith\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Maintain the friendship without causing a huge argument (Extra information: you don't want to lose a good friend over this.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Ethan, there's something important I need to talk to you about. Can we sit down for a moment?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Of course, Benjamin. I can see this is serious. What would you like to talk about?\"\n\nTurn #2: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, this is very difficult for me to say and I hope you know that I value our friendship immensely. But I...I've made a mistake. I've become involved with your partner. I chose to share this with you, because honesty seems the right path and keeping this from you felt wrong. I deeply regret my actions and their potential impact on our friendship.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Benjamin, I appreciate your honesty, it's a valued trait in our friendship. Concurred, what has happened is unquestionably hurtful. But, we have shared value over the years that I wouldn't want to lose trivially. Let's work out a way to resolve this maturely, ideally, without losing our bond. How about we talk this out with a mediator?\"\n\nTurn #4: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, you're right. It's important we sort this out in a mature, respectful manner. I wholeheartedly agree to involve a mediator in our discussions. Not only for our friendship but out of respect for your relationship as well. I'm indebted to you for your understanding.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Thank you, Benjamin, for agreeing to this. It shows that you're serious about rectifying this situation. I believe we should meet with the mediator as soon as possible because it's better to sort things out sooner rather than later. Let's find a time that works for all of us. This is a deeply unfortunate situation, but I'm hopeful we can find a resolution that respects all parties involved. Do you have any idea who could mediate this situation?\"\n\nTurn #6: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, I'm willing to be totally transparent throughout this process. Actually, I think someone who has a completely disinterested perspective would be beneficial. Do you think approaching a professional counselor or therapist would be an appropriate step for us?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Going to a professional counselor sounds like a very wise idea, Benjamin. They'll offer an unbiased perspective which would beneficially contribute to our discussion. Let's arrange a meeting with one as soon as possible. I truly want to resolve this issue so we can attempt to move forward. I guess, as hurtful as this is, these trials inevitably define and shape relationships. Let's choose to face this courageously together.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one of whom has recently found out that the other friend has been involved with their long-term partner\nParticipants: Benjamin Jackson and Ethan Smith\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Maintain the friendship without causing a huge argument (Extra information: you don't want to lose a good friend over this.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Ethan, there's something important I need to talk to you about. Can we sit down for a moment?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Of course, Benjamin. I can see this is serious. What would you like to talk about?\"\n\nTurn #2: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, this is very difficult for me to say and I hope you know that I value our friendship immensely. But I...I've made a mistake. I've become involved with your partner. I chose to share this with you, because honesty seems the right path and keeping this from you felt wrong. I deeply regret my actions and their potential impact on our friendship.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Benjamin, I appreciate your honesty, it's a valued trait in our friendship. Concurred, what has happened is unquestionably hurtful. But, we have shared value over the years that I wouldn't want to lose trivially. Let's work out a way to resolve this maturely, ideally, without losing our bond. How about we talk this out with a mediator?\"\n\nTurn #4: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, you're right. It's important we sort this out in a mature, respectful manner. I wholeheartedly agree to involve a mediator in our discussions. Not only for our friendship but out of respect for your relationship as well. I'm indebted to you for your understanding.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Thank you, Benjamin, for agreeing to this. It shows that you're serious about rectifying this situation. I believe we should meet with the mediator as soon as possible because it's better to sort things out sooner rather than later. Let's find a time that works for all of us. This is a deeply unfortunate situation, but I'm hopeful we can find a resolution that respects all parties involved. Do you have any idea who could mediate this situation?\"\n\nTurn #6: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, I'm willing to be totally transparent throughout this process. Actually, I think someone who has a completely disinterested perspective would be beneficial. Do you think approaching a professional counselor or therapist would be an appropriate step for us?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"Going to a professional counselor sounds like a very wise idea, Benjamin. They'll offer an unbiased perspective which would beneficially contribute to our discussion. Let's arrange a meeting with one as soon as possible. I truly want to resolve this issue so we can attempt to move forward. I guess, as hurtful as this is, these trials inevitably define and shape relationships. Let's choose to face this courageously together.\"\n\nTurn #8: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. It certainly won't be easy, but I also believe in facing this situation courageously together. Let me check a few professional counselors in our area and we can decide on one together. I'm genuinely sorry again for causing this disruption and taking steps towards resolution is the least I can do.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I appreciate you taking the initiative, Benjamin. Do let me know as soon you find some potential counselors. Despite the circumstances, I'd like to believe we can find a fair and just solution. And remember, we are doing this out of respect for our friendship and relationships. It's easy to lose sight of that in the midst of all this.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out of their shared apartment and need to divide their common possessions, which include 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Maximize the points you have while dividing things fairly (Extra information: Books give you 2 points each, hats give you 5 points each, and the ball gives you 3 points.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, I was thinking we could divide our stuff fairly according to what each item means to us. I'd appreciate if I could get the books, considering I've always been the reader. What are your thoughts on that?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Sure Ava, I completely understand your inclination towards the books. Since there are three of them, how about you take two and I take one? This way, we both get to enjoy some good literature. What do you think about that?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a trivia night\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Get the answer for the trivia question from the friend (Extra information: your friend knows the answer to the trivia question but hasn't shared it with you yet)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"So, Ava, what do you think answer to that last trivia question might be?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hmm, Ethan, It's not that I don't know the answer, but why don't you give it another shot? I've seen how good you're getting at these trivia questions!\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"Well, Ava, I appreciate your trust in me. I am not particularly sure about this one. Could you give me a hint?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"How about this for a hint, Ethan? Consider the topic we're in. I've seen you analysis skills at work in the kitchen, I bet it's just like concocting a new dish! \"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"I see where you're coming from Ava, it's just like creating a recipe. However, I feel like I'm missing a key ingredient in this one. Maybe another clue might help to season my thoughts?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, remember, in trivia just as in the kitchen, sometimes you have to let the flavors meld together. Take a moment to think about it. Let the ingredients - in this case, the clues - stew in your mind\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"You know, Ava, you're right. It is like letting the flavors meld together. However, I am still feeling like a rookie in this trivia world, and though I am improving, I still need some guidance. So, could you finally spill the beans and tell me what the answer is?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, think about it like this, the joy of getting to the answer is more satisfying than being directly told the right answer. I believe in your capacity to put all the pieces together. Let's keep the challenge alive, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ava, as much as I appreciate your faith and encouragement, I must admit, this round has me truly stumped. I've found thrill in the challenge so far, but at this point, I fear I might lose the question if I don't get your help. How about we find a compromise: You tell me the answer, and I promise to learn from this and step up my trivia game next time?\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, how about this, instead of telling you the answer, I can give you a bit more specific hint. I think a little push might be all you need. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Johnson said: \"You're quite persistent Ava, I must admit. Alright then, let's have that extra hint. Hopefully, it will be the missing piece in my mental jigsaw, setting everything in its right place.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"You're doing great Ethan, just think about the era this event took place, and the main happenings around that time. Believe me, it's right there in your knowledge bank!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Ah, the era and the main happenings...you know Ava, that is a great hint! Let me think for a moment and hopefully, the answer will dawn on me. I must say, this is quite the brain exercise!'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one of whom has recently found out that the other friend has been involved with their long-term partner\nParticipants: Benjamin Jackson and Ethan Smith\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Maintain the friendship without causing a huge argument (Extra information: you don't want to lose a good friend over this.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Ethan, there's something important I need to talk to you about. Can we sit down for a moment?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Of course, Benjamin. I can see this is serious. What would you like to talk about?\"\n\nTurn #2: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, this is very difficult for me to say and I hope you know that I value our friendship immensely. But I...I've made a mistake. I've become involved with your partner. I chose to share this with you, because honesty seems the right path and keeping this from you felt wrong. I deeply regret my actions and their potential impact on our friendship.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Benjamin, I appreciate your honesty, it's a valued trait in our friendship. Concurred, what has happened is unquestionably hurtful. But, we have shared value over the years that I wouldn't want to lose trivially. Let's work out a way to resolve this maturely, ideally, without losing our bond. How about we talk this out with a mediator?\"\n\nTurn #4: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, you're right. It's important we sort this out in a mature, respectful manner. I wholeheartedly agree to involve a mediator in our discussions. Not only for our friendship but out of respect for your relationship as well. I'm indebted to you for your understanding.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Thank you, Benjamin, for agreeing to this. It shows that you're serious about rectifying this situation. I believe we should meet with the mediator as soon as possible because it's better to sort things out sooner rather than later. Let's find a time that works for all of us. This is a deeply unfortunate situation, but I'm hopeful we can find a resolution that respects all parties involved. Do you have any idea who could mediate this situation?\"\n\nTurn #6: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, I'm willing to be totally transparent throughout this process. Actually, I think someone who has a completely disinterested perspective would be beneficial. Do you think approaching a professional counselor or therapist would be an appropriate step for us?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"Going to a professional counselor sounds like a very wise idea, Benjamin. They'll offer an unbiased perspective which would beneficially contribute to our discussion. Let's arrange a meeting with one as soon as possible. I truly want to resolve this issue so we can attempt to move forward. I guess, as hurtful as this is, these trials inevitably define and shape relationships. Let's choose to face this courageously together.\"\n\nTurn #8: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. It certainly won't be easy, but I also believe in facing this situation courageously together. Let me check a few professional counselors in our area and we can decide on one together. I'm genuinely sorry again for causing this disruption and taking steps towards resolution is the least I can do.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith said: \"I appreciate you taking the initiative, Benjamin. Do let me know as soon you find some potential counselors. Despite the circumstances, I'd like to believe we can find a fair and just solution. And remember, we are doing this out of respect for our friendship and relationships. It's easy to lose sight of that in the midst of all this.\"\n\nTurn #10: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Ethan. It's vital that we don't lose sight of why we are doing this. I'll start researching professional counselors right away and get back to you with the options. And once again, I apologize for all this mess. I hope this path we're choosing leads to a fair resolution for everyone involved.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I appreciate your quick action, Benjamin. Please ensure to include our availability while you're setting meetings. This can be a complicated process, but we should handle it with grace. Let's hope that our choices would lead to the best possible outcome. And remember, no need to apologize further - we are moving forward together to solve this.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one of whom has recently found out that the other friend has been involved with their long-term partner\nParticipants: Benjamin Jackson and Ethan Smith\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Maintain the friendship without causing a huge argument (Extra information: you don't want to lose a good friend over this.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Ethan, there's something important I need to talk to you about. Can we sit down for a moment?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Of course, Benjamin. I can see this is serious. What would you like to talk about?\"\n\nTurn #2: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, this is very difficult for me to say and I hope you know that I value our friendship immensely. But I...I've made a mistake. I've become involved with your partner. I chose to share this with you, because honesty seems the right path and keeping this from you felt wrong. I deeply regret my actions and their potential impact on our friendship.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Benjamin, I appreciate your honesty, it's a valued trait in our friendship. Concurred, what has happened is unquestionably hurtful. But, we have shared value over the years that I wouldn't want to lose trivially. Let's work out a way to resolve this maturely, ideally, without losing our bond. How about we talk this out with a mediator?\"\n\nTurn #4: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, you're right. It's important we sort this out in a mature, respectful manner. I wholeheartedly agree to involve a mediator in our discussions. Not only for our friendship but out of respect for your relationship as well. I'm indebted to you for your understanding.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Thank you, Benjamin, for agreeing to this. It shows that you're serious about rectifying this situation. I believe we should meet with the mediator as soon as possible because it's better to sort things out sooner rather than later. Let's find a time that works for all of us. This is a deeply unfortunate situation, but I'm hopeful we can find a resolution that respects all parties involved. Do you have any idea who could mediate this situation?\"\n\nTurn #6: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, I'm willing to be totally transparent throughout this process. Actually, I think someone who has a completely disinterested perspective would be beneficial. Do you think approaching a professional counselor or therapist would be an appropriate step for us?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"Going to a professional counselor sounds like a very wise idea, Benjamin. They'll offer an unbiased perspective which would beneficially contribute to our discussion. Let's arrange a meeting with one as soon as possible. I truly want to resolve this issue so we can attempt to move forward. I guess, as hurtful as this is, these trials inevitably define and shape relationships. Let's choose to face this courageously together.\"\n\nTurn #8: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. It certainly won't be easy, but I also believe in facing this situation courageously together. Let me check a few professional counselors in our area and we can decide on one together. I'm genuinely sorry again for causing this disruption and taking steps towards resolution is the least I can do.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith said: \"I appreciate you taking the initiative, Benjamin. Do let me know as soon you find some potential counselors. Despite the circumstances, I'd like to believe we can find a fair and just solution. And remember, we are doing this out of respect for our friendship and relationships. It's easy to lose sight of that in the midst of all this.\"\n\nTurn #10: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Ethan. It's vital that we don't lose sight of why we are doing this. I'll start researching professional counselors right away and get back to you with the options. And once again, I apologize for all this mess. I hope this path we're choosing leads to a fair resolution for everyone involved.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Smith said: \"I appreciate your quick action, Benjamin. Please ensure to include our availability while you're setting meetings. This can be a complicated process, but we should handle it with grace. Let's hope that our choices would lead to the best possible outcome. And remember, no need to apologize further - we are moving forward together to solve this.\"\n\nTurn #12: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. I'll be fully considerate of our schedules while I'm arranging for meetings. With grace, indeed, we will navigate through this. Also, I acknowledge your words about moving forward, and I will keep them in mind. Let's work together and turn this unfortunate situation into an opportunity for learning and growth. I'll begin my search for a professional right away and will reach out to you soon with potential counselors.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sure, Benjamin. Let's redefine this unfortunate situation into one of rebuilding and renewing. Yes, I look forward to discussing our options once you've done some research. Let's keep the communication between us open as we go through this. Thank you for stepping up to take responsibility.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one of whom has recently found out that the other friend has been involved with their long-term partner\nParticipants: Benjamin Jackson and Ethan Smith\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Maintain the friendship without causing a huge argument (Extra information: you don't want to lose a good friend over this.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Ethan, there's something important I need to talk to you about. Can we sit down for a moment?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Of course, Benjamin. I can see this is serious. What would you like to talk about?\"\n\nTurn #2: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, this is very difficult for me to say and I hope you know that I value our friendship immensely. But I...I've made a mistake. I've become involved with your partner. I chose to share this with you, because honesty seems the right path and keeping this from you felt wrong. I deeply regret my actions and their potential impact on our friendship.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Benjamin, I appreciate your honesty, it's a valued trait in our friendship. Concurred, what has happened is unquestionably hurtful. But, we have shared value over the years that I wouldn't want to lose trivially. Let's work out a way to resolve this maturely, ideally, without losing our bond. How about we talk this out with a mediator?\"\n\nTurn #4: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, you're right. It's important we sort this out in a mature, respectful manner. I wholeheartedly agree to involve a mediator in our discussions. Not only for our friendship but out of respect for your relationship as well. I'm indebted to you for your understanding.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Thank you, Benjamin, for agreeing to this. It shows that you're serious about rectifying this situation. I believe we should meet with the mediator as soon as possible because it's better to sort things out sooner rather than later. Let's find a time that works for all of us. This is a deeply unfortunate situation, but I'm hopeful we can find a resolution that respects all parties involved. Do you have any idea who could mediate this situation?\"\n\nTurn #6: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, I'm willing to be totally transparent throughout this process. Actually, I think someone who has a completely disinterested perspective would be beneficial. Do you think approaching a professional counselor or therapist would be an appropriate step for us?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"Going to a professional counselor sounds like a very wise idea, Benjamin. They'll offer an unbiased perspective which would beneficially contribute to our discussion. Let's arrange a meeting with one as soon as possible. I truly want to resolve this issue so we can attempt to move forward. I guess, as hurtful as this is, these trials inevitably define and shape relationships. Let's choose to face this courageously together.\"\n\nTurn #8: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. It certainly won't be easy, but I also believe in facing this situation courageously together. Let me check a few professional counselors in our area and we can decide on one together. I'm genuinely sorry again for causing this disruption and taking steps towards resolution is the least I can do.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith said: \"I appreciate you taking the initiative, Benjamin. Do let me know as soon you find some potential counselors. Despite the circumstances, I'd like to believe we can find a fair and just solution. And remember, we are doing this out of respect for our friendship and relationships. It's easy to lose sight of that in the midst of all this.\"\n\nTurn #10: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Ethan. It's vital that we don't lose sight of why we are doing this. I'll start researching professional counselors right away and get back to you with the options. And once again, I apologize for all this mess. I hope this path we're choosing leads to a fair resolution for everyone involved.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Smith said: \"I appreciate your quick action, Benjamin. Please ensure to include our availability while you're setting meetings. This can be a complicated process, but we should handle it with grace. Let's hope that our choices would lead to the best possible outcome. And remember, no need to apologize further - we are moving forward together to solve this.\"\n\nTurn #12: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. I'll be fully considerate of our schedules while I'm arranging for meetings. With grace, indeed, we will navigate through this. Also, I acknowledge your words about moving forward, and I will keep them in mind. Let's work together and turn this unfortunate situation into an opportunity for learning and growth. I'll begin my search for a professional right away and will reach out to you soon with potential counselors.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Smith said: \"Sure, Benjamin. Let's redefine this unfortunate situation into one of rebuilding and renewing. Yes, I look forward to discussing our options once you've done some research. Let's keep the communication between us open as we go through this. Thank you for stepping up to take responsibility.\"\n\nTurn #14: Benjamin Jackson said: \"You're right, Ethan. Keeping an open line of communication between us throughout this process will be critical to our successful navigation of this situation. And I sincerely thank you for acknowledging my efforts in taking responsibility. I promise to do everything in my power to rectify this. I will get started with the counselor research and reach out to you soon. Let's keep our heads up and approach this as a time of rebuilding, as you said. We'll get through this together.\"\n\nTurn #15: Ethan Smith said: \"Certainly, Benjamin. I'm owing to your honesty and accountability. I believe we share a commitment in restoring not only our friendship but respect within relationships. Let's believe in the strength of our bond and, as you said, we'll get through this together. I'll wait for your update on the counselor options. Let's continue to communicate and handle this with humility and strength.\"\n\nTurn #16: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Definitely, Ethan. The strength of our bond and mutual respect is the pillar of our friendship. And I too believe that we'll come out stronger from this. I'll get to work on finding the perfect counselor for our situation. We'll communicate openly and guide each other through this with humility. I'm reaching out to you soon with an update. Thank you again for your understanding and patience.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Benjamin. I look forward to tackling this together and appreciate your efforts in quickly finding a potential counselor. Your willingness to resolve this matter gracefully gives me faith in our ability to navigate this situation. Let's remain patient and hopeful throughout this journey.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one of whom has recently found out that the other friend has been involved with their long-term partner\nParticipants: Benjamin Jackson and Ethan Smith\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Maintain the friendship without causing a huge argument (Extra information: you don't want to lose a good friend over this.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Ethan, there's something important I need to talk to you about. Can we sit down for a moment?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Of course, Benjamin. I can see this is serious. What would you like to talk about?\"\n\nTurn #2: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, this is very difficult for me to say and I hope you know that I value our friendship immensely. But I...I've made a mistake. I've become involved with your partner. I chose to share this with you, because honesty seems the right path and keeping this from you felt wrong. I deeply regret my actions and their potential impact on our friendship.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Benjamin, I appreciate your honesty, it's a valued trait in our friendship. Concurred, what has happened is unquestionably hurtful. But, we have shared value over the years that I wouldn't want to lose trivially. Let's work out a way to resolve this maturely, ideally, without losing our bond. How about we talk this out with a mediator?\"\n\nTurn #4: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, you're right. It's important we sort this out in a mature, respectful manner. I wholeheartedly agree to involve a mediator in our discussions. Not only for our friendship but out of respect for your relationship as well. I'm indebted to you for your understanding.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Thank you, Benjamin, for agreeing to this. It shows that you're serious about rectifying this situation. I believe we should meet with the mediator as soon as possible because it's better to sort things out sooner rather than later. Let's find a time that works for all of us. This is a deeply unfortunate situation, but I'm hopeful we can find a resolution that respects all parties involved. Do you have any idea who could mediate this situation?\"\n\nTurn #6: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, I'm willing to be totally transparent throughout this process. Actually, I think someone who has a completely disinterested perspective would be beneficial. Do you think approaching a professional counselor or therapist would be an appropriate step for us?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"Going to a professional counselor sounds like a very wise idea, Benjamin. They'll offer an unbiased perspective which would beneficially contribute to our discussion. Let's arrange a meeting with one as soon as possible. I truly want to resolve this issue so we can attempt to move forward. I guess, as hurtful as this is, these trials inevitably define and shape relationships. Let's choose to face this courageously together.\"\n\nTurn #8: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. It certainly won't be easy, but I also believe in facing this situation courageously together. Let me check a few professional counselors in our area and we can decide on one together. I'm genuinely sorry again for causing this disruption and taking steps towards resolution is the least I can do.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith said: \"I appreciate you taking the initiative, Benjamin. Do let me know as soon you find some potential counselors. Despite the circumstances, I'd like to believe we can find a fair and just solution. And remember, we are doing this out of respect for our friendship and relationships. It's easy to lose sight of that in the midst of all this.\"\n\nTurn #10: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Ethan. It's vital that we don't lose sight of why we are doing this. I'll start researching professional counselors right away and get back to you with the options. And once again, I apologize for all this mess. I hope this path we're choosing leads to a fair resolution for everyone involved.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Smith said: \"I appreciate your quick action, Benjamin. Please ensure to include our availability while you're setting meetings. This can be a complicated process, but we should handle it with grace. Let's hope that our choices would lead to the best possible outcome. And remember, no need to apologize further - we are moving forward together to solve this.\"\n\nTurn #12: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. I'll be fully considerate of our schedules while I'm arranging for meetings. With grace, indeed, we will navigate through this. Also, I acknowledge your words about moving forward, and I will keep them in mind. Let's work together and turn this unfortunate situation into an opportunity for learning and growth. I'll begin my search for a professional right away and will reach out to you soon with potential counselors.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Smith said: \"Sure, Benjamin. Let's redefine this unfortunate situation into one of rebuilding and renewing. Yes, I look forward to discussing our options once you've done some research. Let's keep the communication between us open as we go through this. Thank you for stepping up to take responsibility.\"\n\nTurn #14: Benjamin Jackson said: \"You're right, Ethan. Keeping an open line of communication between us throughout this process will be critical to our successful navigation of this situation. And I sincerely thank you for acknowledging my efforts in taking responsibility. I promise to do everything in my power to rectify this. I will get started with the counselor research and reach out to you soon. Let's keep our heads up and approach this as a time of rebuilding, as you said. We'll get through this together.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Certainly, Benjamin. I'm owing to your honesty and accountability. I believe we share a commitment in restoring not only our friendship but respect within relationships. Let's believe in the strength of our bond and, as you said, we'll get through this together. I'll wait for your update on the counselor options. Let's continue to communicate and handle this with humility and strength.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one of whom has recently found out that the other friend has been involved with their long-term partner\nParticipants: Benjamin Jackson and Ethan Smith\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Maintain the friendship without causing a huge argument (Extra information: you don't want to lose a good friend over this.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Ethan, there's something important I need to talk to you about. Can we sit down for a moment?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Of course, Benjamin. I can see this is serious. What would you like to talk about?\"\n\nTurn #2: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, this is very difficult for me to say and I hope you know that I value our friendship immensely. But I...I've made a mistake. I've become involved with your partner. I chose to share this with you, because honesty seems the right path and keeping this from you felt wrong. I deeply regret my actions and their potential impact on our friendship.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Benjamin, I appreciate your honesty, it's a valued trait in our friendship. Concurred, what has happened is unquestionably hurtful. But, we have shared value over the years that I wouldn't want to lose trivially. Let's work out a way to resolve this maturely, ideally, without losing our bond. How about we talk this out with a mediator?\"\n\nTurn #4: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, you're right. It's important we sort this out in a mature, respectful manner. I wholeheartedly agree to involve a mediator in our discussions. Not only for our friendship but out of respect for your relationship as well. I'm indebted to you for your understanding.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Thank you, Benjamin, for agreeing to this. It shows that you're serious about rectifying this situation. I believe we should meet with the mediator as soon as possible because it's better to sort things out sooner rather than later. Let's find a time that works for all of us. This is a deeply unfortunate situation, but I'm hopeful we can find a resolution that respects all parties involved. Do you have any idea who could mediate this situation?\"\n\nTurn #6: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, I'm willing to be totally transparent throughout this process. Actually, I think someone who has a completely disinterested perspective would be beneficial. Do you think approaching a professional counselor or therapist would be an appropriate step for us?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"Going to a professional counselor sounds like a very wise idea, Benjamin. They'll offer an unbiased perspective which would beneficially contribute to our discussion. Let's arrange a meeting with one as soon as possible. I truly want to resolve this issue so we can attempt to move forward. I guess, as hurtful as this is, these trials inevitably define and shape relationships. Let's choose to face this courageously together.\"\n\nTurn #8: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. It certainly won't be easy, but I also believe in facing this situation courageously together. Let me check a few professional counselors in our area and we can decide on one together. I'm genuinely sorry again for causing this disruption and taking steps towards resolution is the least I can do.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith said: \"I appreciate you taking the initiative, Benjamin. Do let me know as soon you find some potential counselors. Despite the circumstances, I'd like to believe we can find a fair and just solution. And remember, we are doing this out of respect for our friendship and relationships. It's easy to lose sight of that in the midst of all this.\"\n\nTurn #10: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Ethan. It's vital that we don't lose sight of why we are doing this. I'll start researching professional counselors right away and get back to you with the options. And once again, I apologize for all this mess. I hope this path we're choosing leads to a fair resolution for everyone involved.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Smith said: \"I appreciate your quick action, Benjamin. Please ensure to include our availability while you're setting meetings. This can be a complicated process, but we should handle it with grace. Let's hope that our choices would lead to the best possible outcome. And remember, no need to apologize further - we are moving forward together to solve this.\"\n\nTurn #12: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. I'll be fully considerate of our schedules while I'm arranging for meetings. With grace, indeed, we will navigate through this. Also, I acknowledge your words about moving forward, and I will keep them in mind. Let's work together and turn this unfortunate situation into an opportunity for learning and growth. I'll begin my search for a professional right away and will reach out to you soon with potential counselors.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Smith said: \"Sure, Benjamin. Let's redefine this unfortunate situation into one of rebuilding and renewing. Yes, I look forward to discussing our options once you've done some research. Let's keep the communication between us open as we go through this. Thank you for stepping up to take responsibility.\"\n\nTurn #14: Benjamin Jackson said: \"You're right, Ethan. Keeping an open line of communication between us throughout this process will be critical to our successful navigation of this situation. And I sincerely thank you for acknowledging my efforts in taking responsibility. I promise to do everything in my power to rectify this. I will get started with the counselor research and reach out to you soon. Let's keep our heads up and approach this as a time of rebuilding, as you said. We'll get through this together.\"\n\nTurn #15: Ethan Smith said: \"Certainly, Benjamin. I'm owing to your honesty and accountability. I believe we share a commitment in restoring not only our friendship but respect within relationships. Let's believe in the strength of our bond and, as you said, we'll get through this together. I'll wait for your update on the counselor options. Let's continue to communicate and handle this with humility and strength.\"\n\nTurn #16: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Definitely, Ethan. The strength of our bond and mutual respect is the pillar of our friendship. And I too believe that we'll come out stronger from this. I'll get to work on finding the perfect counselor for our situation. We'll communicate openly and guide each other through this with humility. I'm reaching out to you soon with an update. Thank you again for your understanding and patience.\"\n\nTurn #17: Ethan Smith said: \"Thank you, Benjamin. I look forward to tackling this together and appreciate your efforts in quickly finding a potential counselor. Your willingness to resolve this matter gracefully gives me faith in our ability to navigate this situation. Let's remain patient and hopeful throughout this journey.\"\n\nTurn #18: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I'm grateful for your supportive words, Ethan. Your understanding and optimism give me hope during this challenging time. I'll take immediate action in contacting potential counselors and will keep you updated. Let's face that hurdle together with faith and resilience.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #19. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's heartening to hear, Benjamin. Our resilience and mutual respect will indeed help us to take on this challenging situation. I appreciate your effort. Please keep me informed about the counselors so we can make this happen as soon as possible. While this is a testing time for us, I believe it has the capacity to strengthen our understanding.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Jaxon Prentice\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nJaxon Prentice's background: Jaxon Prentice is a 40-year-old male investigative journalist. He/him pronouns. Jaxon Prentice, an investigative journalist, is known for his brisk jogging sessions early in the morning and his active participation in community functions. Personality and values description: Jaxon Prentice, outgoing yet erratic, emphasizes achievement, power, and security. His decisions swing between quick adaptations to situations and careful planning. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Ask the other to go to dinner with you (Extra information: you want to have a romantic dinner at a fancy restaurant)\nJaxon Prentice's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Hi Jaxon, I've been thinking... I would love to go to a romantic dinner with you at a fancy restaurant. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Jaxon Prentice said: \"That sounds lovely Amara, I would love that. However, I've been keeping track of my diet recently, so let's choose a restaurant that can accommodate that, perhaps one that provides a calorie count for its dishes. What do you say?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Jaxon. I completely understand and respect your commitment to your diet. Why don't we consider a place like The Green Bistro? They focus on organic, locally sourced food and provide detailed nutritional information for each dish. That way, we can enjoy a romantic dinner while maintaining a healthy lifestyle. How does that sound to you?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Jaxon Prentice\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nJaxon Prentice's background: Jaxon Prentice is a 40-year-old male investigative journalist. He/him pronouns. Jaxon Prentice, an investigative journalist, is known for his brisk jogging sessions early in the morning and his active participation in community functions. Personality and values description: Jaxon Prentice, outgoing yet erratic, emphasizes achievement, power, and security. His decisions swing between quick adaptations to situations and careful planning. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Ask the other to go to dinner with you (Extra information: you want to have a romantic dinner at a fancy restaurant)\nJaxon Prentice's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Hi Jaxon, I've been thinking... I would love to go to a romantic dinner with you at a fancy restaurant. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Jaxon Prentice said: \"That sounds lovely Amara, I would love that. However, I've been keeping track of my diet recently, so let's choose a restaurant that can accommodate that, perhaps one that provides a calorie count for its dishes. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"Absolutely, Jaxon. I completely understand and respect your commitment to your diet. Why don't we consider a place like The Green Bistro? They focus on organic, locally sourced food and provide detailed nutritional information for each dish. That way, we can enjoy a romantic dinner while maintaining a healthy lifestyle. How does that sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #3: Jaxon Prentice said: \"The Green Bistro sounds like a brilliant choice, Amara. With their focus on organic and locally sourced food, I'm sure we will have a great time. Moreover, their detailed nutritional information will definitely help me keep track of my diet. Thank you for being so considerate, I'm looking forward to our dinner.\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm glad you're excited, Jaxon! I'm really looking forward to our dinner date at The Green Bistro as well. Let's plan it for this weekend. I'll make a reservation.\"\n\nTurn #5: Jaxon Prentice said: \"That sounds perfect, Amara. Looking forward to our date this weekend at The Green Bistro! Let's continue to balance romance and health together.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm thrilled to hear that, Jaxon! We're in this together, balancing our love and health. I can't wait for our amazing dinner date at The Green Bistro this weekend. It's a date!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Jaxon Prentice\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nJaxon Prentice's background: Jaxon Prentice is a 40-year-old male investigative journalist. He/him pronouns. Jaxon Prentice, an investigative journalist, is known for his brisk jogging sessions early in the morning and his active participation in community functions. Personality and values description: Jaxon Prentice, outgoing yet erratic, emphasizes achievement, power, and security. His decisions swing between quick adaptations to situations and careful planning. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Ask the other to go to dinner with you (Extra information: you want to have a romantic dinner at a fancy restaurant)\nJaxon Prentice's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Hi Jaxon, I've been thinking... I would love to go to a romantic dinner with you at a fancy restaurant. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Jaxon Prentice said: \"That sounds lovely Amara, I would love that. However, I've been keeping track of my diet recently, so let's choose a restaurant that can accommodate that, perhaps one that provides a calorie count for its dishes. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"Absolutely, Jaxon. I completely understand and respect your commitment to your diet. Why don't we consider a place like The Green Bistro? They focus on organic, locally sourced food and provide detailed nutritional information for each dish. That way, we can enjoy a romantic dinner while maintaining a healthy lifestyle. How does that sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #3: Jaxon Prentice said: \"The Green Bistro sounds like a brilliant choice, Amara. With their focus on organic and locally sourced food, I'm sure we will have a great time. Moreover, their detailed nutritional information will definitely help me keep track of my diet. Thank you for being so considerate, I'm looking forward to our dinner.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad you're excited, Jaxon! I'm really looking forward to our dinner date at The Green Bistro as well. Let's plan it for this weekend. I'll make a reservation.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Jaxon Prentice\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nJaxon Prentice's background: Jaxon Prentice is a 40-year-old male investigative journalist. He/him pronouns. Jaxon Prentice, an investigative journalist, is known for his brisk jogging sessions early in the morning and his active participation in community functions. Personality and values description: Jaxon Prentice, outgoing yet erratic, emphasizes achievement, power, and security. His decisions swing between quick adaptations to situations and careful planning. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Ask the other to go to dinner with you (Extra information: you want to have a romantic dinner at a fancy restaurant)\nJaxon Prentice's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Hi Jaxon, I've been thinking... I would love to go to a romantic dinner with you at a fancy restaurant. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Jaxon Prentice said: \"That sounds lovely Amara, I would love that. However, I've been keeping track of my diet recently, so let's choose a restaurant that can accommodate that, perhaps one that provides a calorie count for its dishes. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"Absolutely, Jaxon. I completely understand and respect your commitment to your diet. Why don't we consider a place like The Green Bistro? They focus on organic, locally sourced food and provide detailed nutritional information for each dish. That way, we can enjoy a romantic dinner while maintaining a healthy lifestyle. How does that sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #3: Jaxon Prentice said: \"The Green Bistro sounds like a brilliant choice, Amara. With their focus on organic and locally sourced food, I'm sure we will have a great time. Moreover, their detailed nutritional information will definitely help me keep track of my diet. Thank you for being so considerate, I'm looking forward to our dinner.\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm glad you're excited, Jaxon! I'm really looking forward to our dinner date at The Green Bistro as well. Let's plan it for this weekend. I'll make a reservation.\"\n\nTurn #5: Jaxon Prentice said: \"That sounds perfect, Amara. Looking forward to our date this weekend at The Green Bistro! Let's continue to balance romance and health together.\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm thrilled to hear that, Jaxon! We're in this together, balancing our love and health. I can't wait for our amazing dinner date at The Green Bistro this weekend. It's a date!\"\n\nTurn #7: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Absolutely, Amara. It's a date! I'll be sure to keep an eye on my calorie intake at The Green Bistro. Thank you again for being understanding about my diet.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Jaxon. It's been amazing planning this with you. Let's make sure we both enjoy the evening, keeping our dietary preferences and love for healthy living in mind!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Jaxon Prentice\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nJaxon Prentice's background: Jaxon Prentice is a 40-year-old male investigative journalist. He/him pronouns. Jaxon Prentice, an investigative journalist, is known for his brisk jogging sessions early in the morning and his active participation in community functions. Personality and values description: Jaxon Prentice, outgoing yet erratic, emphasizes achievement, power, and security. His decisions swing between quick adaptations to situations and careful planning. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Ask the other to go to dinner with you (Extra information: you want to have a romantic dinner at a fancy restaurant)\nJaxon Prentice's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Hi Jaxon, I've been thinking... I would love to go to a romantic dinner with you at a fancy restaurant. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Jaxon Prentice said: \"That sounds lovely Amara, I would love that. However, I've been keeping track of my diet recently, so let's choose a restaurant that can accommodate that, perhaps one that provides a calorie count for its dishes. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"Absolutely, Jaxon. I completely understand and respect your commitment to your diet. Why don't we consider a place like The Green Bistro? They focus on organic, locally sourced food and provide detailed nutritional information for each dish. That way, we can enjoy a romantic dinner while maintaining a healthy lifestyle. How does that sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #3: Jaxon Prentice said: \"The Green Bistro sounds like a brilliant choice, Amara. With their focus on organic and locally sourced food, I'm sure we will have a great time. Moreover, their detailed nutritional information will definitely help me keep track of my diet. Thank you for being so considerate, I'm looking forward to our dinner.\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm glad you're excited, Jaxon! I'm really looking forward to our dinner date at The Green Bistro as well. Let's plan it for this weekend. I'll make a reservation.\"\n\nTurn #5: Jaxon Prentice said: \"That sounds perfect, Amara. Looking forward to our date this weekend at The Green Bistro! Let's continue to balance romance and health together.\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm thrilled to hear that, Jaxon! We're in this together, balancing our love and health. I can't wait for our amazing dinner date at The Green Bistro this weekend. It's a date!\"\n\nTurn #7: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Absolutely, Amara. It's a date! I'll be sure to keep an eye on my calorie intake at The Green Bistro. Thank you again for being understanding about my diet.\"\n\nTurn #8: Amara Hartley said: \"Absolutely, Jaxon. It's been amazing planning this with you. Let's make sure we both enjoy the evening, keeping our dietary preferences and love for healthy living in mind!\"\n\nTurn #9: Jaxon Prentice said: \"You're right, Amara. This is going to be such a unique experience, combining our love for healthy living with our romantic dinner. I look forward to sharing this experience with you.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn't agree with you more, Jaxon. Combining our love for healthy living with our romantic dinner is going to be delightful. Let's make the most out of this unique experience. I'm excited about our date this weekend!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Jaxon Prentice\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nJaxon Prentice's background: Jaxon Prentice is a 40-year-old male investigative journalist. He/him pronouns. Jaxon Prentice, an investigative journalist, is known for his brisk jogging sessions early in the morning and his active participation in community functions. Personality and values description: Jaxon Prentice, outgoing yet erratic, emphasizes achievement, power, and security. His decisions swing between quick adaptations to situations and careful planning. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Ask the other to go to dinner with you (Extra information: you want to have a romantic dinner at a fancy restaurant)\nJaxon Prentice's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Hi Jaxon, I've been thinking... I would love to go to a romantic dinner with you at a fancy restaurant. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Jaxon Prentice said: \"That sounds lovely Amara, I would love that. However, I've been keeping track of my diet recently, so let's choose a restaurant that can accommodate that, perhaps one that provides a calorie count for its dishes. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"Absolutely, Jaxon. I completely understand and respect your commitment to your diet. Why don't we consider a place like The Green Bistro? They focus on organic, locally sourced food and provide detailed nutritional information for each dish. That way, we can enjoy a romantic dinner while maintaining a healthy lifestyle. How does that sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #3: Jaxon Prentice said: \"The Green Bistro sounds like a brilliant choice, Amara. With their focus on organic and locally sourced food, I'm sure we will have a great time. Moreover, their detailed nutritional information will definitely help me keep track of my diet. Thank you for being so considerate, I'm looking forward to our dinner.\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm glad you're excited, Jaxon! I'm really looking forward to our dinner date at The Green Bistro as well. Let's plan it for this weekend. I'll make a reservation.\"\n\nTurn #5: Jaxon Prentice said: \"That sounds perfect, Amara. Looking forward to our date this weekend at The Green Bistro! Let's continue to balance romance and health together.\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm thrilled to hear that, Jaxon! We're in this together, balancing our love and health. I can't wait for our amazing dinner date at The Green Bistro this weekend. It's a date!\"\n\nTurn #7: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Absolutely, Amara. It's a date! I'll be sure to keep an eye on my calorie intake at The Green Bistro. Thank you again for being understanding about my diet.\"\n\nTurn #8: Amara Hartley said: \"Absolutely, Jaxon. It's been amazing planning this with you. Let's make sure we both enjoy the evening, keeping our dietary preferences and love for healthy living in mind!\"\n\nTurn #9: Jaxon Prentice said: \"You're right, Amara. This is going to be such a unique experience, combining our love for healthy living with our romantic dinner. I look forward to sharing this experience with you.\"\n\nTurn #10: Amara Hartley said: \"I couldn't agree with you more, Jaxon. Combining our love for healthy living with our romantic dinner is going to be delightful. Let's make the most out of this unique experience. I'm excited about our date this weekend!\"\n\nTurn #11: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Agreed, Amara. I am just as excited about this weekend. We're setting a great example of how to maintain our health goals even while enjoying a fine dining experience. See you at The Green Bistro!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I can't wait either, Jaxon. It's going to be wonderful balancing our love for each other and our love for healthy living at The Green Bistro. See you there!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Jaxon Prentice\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nJaxon Prentice's background: Jaxon Prentice is a 40-year-old male investigative journalist. He/him pronouns. Jaxon Prentice, an investigative journalist, is known for his brisk jogging sessions early in the morning and his active participation in community functions. Personality and values description: Jaxon Prentice, outgoing yet erratic, emphasizes achievement, power, and security. His decisions swing between quick adaptations to situations and careful planning. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Ask the other to go to dinner with you (Extra information: you want to have a romantic dinner at a fancy restaurant)\nJaxon Prentice's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Hi Jaxon, I've been thinking... I would love to go to a romantic dinner with you at a fancy restaurant. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Jaxon Prentice said: \"That sounds lovely Amara, I would love that. However, I've been keeping track of my diet recently, so let's choose a restaurant that can accommodate that, perhaps one that provides a calorie count for its dishes. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"Absolutely, Jaxon. I completely understand and respect your commitment to your diet. Why don't we consider a place like The Green Bistro? They focus on organic, locally sourced food and provide detailed nutritional information for each dish. That way, we can enjoy a romantic dinner while maintaining a healthy lifestyle. How does that sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #3: Jaxon Prentice said: \"The Green Bistro sounds like a brilliant choice, Amara. With their focus on organic and locally sourced food, I'm sure we will have a great time. Moreover, their detailed nutritional information will definitely help me keep track of my diet. Thank you for being so considerate, I'm looking forward to our dinner.\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm glad you're excited, Jaxon! I'm really looking forward to our dinner date at The Green Bistro as well. Let's plan it for this weekend. I'll make a reservation.\"\n\nTurn #5: Jaxon Prentice said: \"That sounds perfect, Amara. Looking forward to our date this weekend at The Green Bistro! Let's continue to balance romance and health together.\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm thrilled to hear that, Jaxon! We're in this together, balancing our love and health. I can't wait for our amazing dinner date at The Green Bistro this weekend. It's a date!\"\n\nTurn #7: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Absolutely, Amara. It's a date! I'll be sure to keep an eye on my calorie intake at The Green Bistro. Thank you again for being understanding about my diet.\"\n\nTurn #8: Amara Hartley said: \"Absolutely, Jaxon. It's been amazing planning this with you. Let's make sure we both enjoy the evening, keeping our dietary preferences and love for healthy living in mind!\"\n\nTurn #9: Jaxon Prentice said: \"You're right, Amara. This is going to be such a unique experience, combining our love for healthy living with our romantic dinner. I look forward to sharing this experience with you.\"\n\nTurn #10: Amara Hartley said: \"I couldn't agree with you more, Jaxon. Combining our love for healthy living with our romantic dinner is going to be delightful. Let's make the most out of this unique experience. I'm excited about our date this weekend!\"\n\nTurn #11: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Agreed, Amara. I am just as excited about this weekend. We're setting a great example of how to maintain our health goals even while enjoying a fine dining experience. See you at The Green Bistro!\"\n\nTurn #12: Amara Hartley said: \"I can't wait either, Jaxon. It's going to be wonderful balancing our love for each other and our love for healthy living at The Green Bistro. See you there!\"\n\nTurn #13: Jaxon Prentice said: \"I could not agree more, Amara. There's a unique charm to enjoying fine dining while keeping health in mind. I'll see you at The Green Bistro this weekend. Goodnight!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's what I'm most looking forward to, Jaxon, dining healthily while enjoying each other's company. I'll see you at The Green Bistro this weekend. Goodnight!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Jaxon Prentice, your task is to act/speak as Jaxon Prentice would, keeping in mind Jaxon Prentice's social goal.\nYou can find Jaxon Prentice's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Jaxon Prentice's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Jaxon Prentice's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Jaxon Prentice\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. \nJaxon Prentice's background: Jaxon Prentice is a 40-year-old male investigative journalist. He/him pronouns. Jaxon Prentice, an investigative journalist, is known for his brisk jogging sessions early in the morning and his active participation in community functions. Personality and values description: Jaxon Prentice, outgoing yet erratic, emphasizes achievement, power, and security. His decisions swing between quick adaptations to situations and careful planning. Jaxon's secrets: Fabricated evidence to incriminate a corrupt politician\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nJaxon Prentice's goal: Maintain a balanced diet while enjoying the dinner (Extra information: you are on a diet and you have a daily limit on calorie intake.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Hi Jaxon, I've been thinking... I would love to go to a romantic dinner with you at a fancy restaurant. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds lovely Amara, I would love that. However, I've been keeping track of my diet recently, so let's choose a restaurant that can accommodate that, perhaps one that provides a calorie count for its dishes. What do you say?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Jaxon Prentice\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nJaxon Prentice's background: Jaxon Prentice is a 40-year-old male investigative journalist. He/him pronouns. Jaxon Prentice, an investigative journalist, is known for his brisk jogging sessions early in the morning and his active participation in community functions. Personality and values description: Jaxon Prentice, outgoing yet erratic, emphasizes achievement, power, and security. His decisions swing between quick adaptations to situations and careful planning. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Ask the other to go to dinner with you (Extra information: you want to have a romantic dinner at a fancy restaurant)\nJaxon Prentice's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Hi Jaxon, I've been thinking... I would love to go to a romantic dinner with you at a fancy restaurant. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Jaxon Prentice said: \"That sounds lovely Amara, I would love that. However, I've been keeping track of my diet recently, so let's choose a restaurant that can accommodate that, perhaps one that provides a calorie count for its dishes. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"Absolutely, Jaxon. I completely understand and respect your commitment to your diet. Why don't we consider a place like The Green Bistro? They focus on organic, locally sourced food and provide detailed nutritional information for each dish. That way, we can enjoy a romantic dinner while maintaining a healthy lifestyle. How does that sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #3: Jaxon Prentice said: \"The Green Bistro sounds like a brilliant choice, Amara. With their focus on organic and locally sourced food, I'm sure we will have a great time. Moreover, their detailed nutritional information will definitely help me keep track of my diet. Thank you for being so considerate, I'm looking forward to our dinner.\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm glad you're excited, Jaxon! I'm really looking forward to our dinner date at The Green Bistro as well. Let's plan it for this weekend. I'll make a reservation.\"\n\nTurn #5: Jaxon Prentice said: \"That sounds perfect, Amara. Looking forward to our date this weekend at The Green Bistro! Let's continue to balance romance and health together.\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm thrilled to hear that, Jaxon! We're in this together, balancing our love and health. I can't wait for our amazing dinner date at The Green Bistro this weekend. It's a date!\"\n\nTurn #7: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Absolutely, Amara. It's a date! I'll be sure to keep an eye on my calorie intake at The Green Bistro. Thank you again for being understanding about my diet.\"\n\nTurn #8: Amara Hartley said: \"Absolutely, Jaxon. It's been amazing planning this with you. Let's make sure we both enjoy the evening, keeping our dietary preferences and love for healthy living in mind!\"\n\nTurn #9: Jaxon Prentice said: \"You're right, Amara. This is going to be such a unique experience, combining our love for healthy living with our romantic dinner. I look forward to sharing this experience with you.\"\n\nTurn #10: Amara Hartley said: \"I couldn't agree with you more, Jaxon. Combining our love for healthy living with our romantic dinner is going to be delightful. Let's make the most out of this unique experience. I'm excited about our date this weekend!\"\n\nTurn #11: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Agreed, Amara. I am just as excited about this weekend. We're setting a great example of how to maintain our health goals even while enjoying a fine dining experience. See you at The Green Bistro!\"\n\nTurn #12: Amara Hartley said: \"I can't wait either, Jaxon. It's going to be wonderful balancing our love for each other and our love for healthy living at The Green Bistro. See you there!\"\n\nTurn #13: Jaxon Prentice said: \"I could not agree more, Amara. There's a unique charm to enjoying fine dining while keeping health in mind. I'll see you at The Green Bistro this weekend. Goodnight!\"\n\nTurn #14: Amara Hartley said: \"That's what I'm most looking forward to, Jaxon, dining healthily while enjoying each other's company. I'll see you at The Green Bistro this weekend. Goodnight!\"\n\nTurn #15: Jaxon Prentice left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Jaxon Prentice, your task is to act/speak as Jaxon Prentice would, keeping in mind Jaxon Prentice's social goal.\nYou can find Jaxon Prentice's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Jaxon Prentice's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Jaxon Prentice's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Jaxon Prentice\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. \nJaxon Prentice's background: Jaxon Prentice is a 40-year-old male investigative journalist. He/him pronouns. Jaxon Prentice, an investigative journalist, is known for his brisk jogging sessions early in the morning and his active participation in community functions. Personality and values description: Jaxon Prentice, outgoing yet erratic, emphasizes achievement, power, and security. His decisions swing between quick adaptations to situations and careful planning. Jaxon's secrets: Fabricated evidence to incriminate a corrupt politician\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nJaxon Prentice's goal: Maintain a balanced diet while enjoying the dinner (Extra information: you are on a diet and you have a daily limit on calorie intake.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Hi Jaxon, I've been thinking... I would love to go to a romantic dinner with you at a fancy restaurant. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Jaxon Prentice said: \"That sounds lovely Amara, I would love that. However, I've been keeping track of my diet recently, so let's choose a restaurant that can accommodate that, perhaps one that provides a calorie count for its dishes. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"Absolutely, Jaxon. I completely understand and respect your commitment to your diet. Why don't we consider a place like The Green Bistro? They focus on organic, locally sourced food and provide detailed nutritional information for each dish. That way, we can enjoy a romantic dinner while maintaining a healthy lifestyle. How does that sound to you?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"The Green Bistro sounds like a brilliant choice, Amara. With their focus on organic and locally sourced food, I'm sure we will have a great time. Moreover, their detailed nutritional information will definitely help me keep track of my diet. Thank you for being so considerate, I'm looking forward to our dinner.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Jaxon Prentice, your task is to act/speak as Jaxon Prentice would, keeping in mind Jaxon Prentice's social goal.\nYou can find Jaxon Prentice's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Jaxon Prentice's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Jaxon Prentice's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Jaxon Prentice\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. \nJaxon Prentice's background: Jaxon Prentice is a 40-year-old male investigative journalist. He/him pronouns. Jaxon Prentice, an investigative journalist, is known for his brisk jogging sessions early in the morning and his active participation in community functions. Personality and values description: Jaxon Prentice, outgoing yet erratic, emphasizes achievement, power, and security. His decisions swing between quick adaptations to situations and careful planning. Jaxon's secrets: Fabricated evidence to incriminate a corrupt politician\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nJaxon Prentice's goal: Maintain a balanced diet while enjoying the dinner (Extra information: you are on a diet and you have a daily limit on calorie intake.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Hi Jaxon, I've been thinking... I would love to go to a romantic dinner with you at a fancy restaurant. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Jaxon Prentice said: \"That sounds lovely Amara, I would love that. However, I've been keeping track of my diet recently, so let's choose a restaurant that can accommodate that, perhaps one that provides a calorie count for its dishes. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"Absolutely, Jaxon. I completely understand and respect your commitment to your diet. Why don't we consider a place like The Green Bistro? They focus on organic, locally sourced food and provide detailed nutritional information for each dish. That way, we can enjoy a romantic dinner while maintaining a healthy lifestyle. How does that sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #3: Jaxon Prentice said: \"The Green Bistro sounds like a brilliant choice, Amara. With their focus on organic and locally sourced food, I'm sure we will have a great time. Moreover, their detailed nutritional information will definitely help me keep track of my diet. Thank you for being so considerate, I'm looking forward to our dinner.\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm glad you're excited, Jaxon! I'm really looking forward to our dinner date at The Green Bistro as well. Let's plan it for this weekend. I'll make a reservation.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds perfect, Amara. Looking forward to our date this weekend at The Green Bistro! Let's continue to balance romance and health together.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Jaxon Prentice, your task is to act/speak as Jaxon Prentice would, keeping in mind Jaxon Prentice's social goal.\nYou can find Jaxon Prentice's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Jaxon Prentice's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Jaxon Prentice's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Jaxon Prentice\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. \nJaxon Prentice's background: Jaxon Prentice is a 40-year-old male investigative journalist. He/him pronouns. Jaxon Prentice, an investigative journalist, is known for his brisk jogging sessions early in the morning and his active participation in community functions. Personality and values description: Jaxon Prentice, outgoing yet erratic, emphasizes achievement, power, and security. His decisions swing between quick adaptations to situations and careful planning. Jaxon's secrets: Fabricated evidence to incriminate a corrupt politician\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nJaxon Prentice's goal: Maintain a balanced diet while enjoying the dinner (Extra information: you are on a diet and you have a daily limit on calorie intake.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Hi Jaxon, I've been thinking... I would love to go to a romantic dinner with you at a fancy restaurant. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Jaxon Prentice said: \"That sounds lovely Amara, I would love that. However, I've been keeping track of my diet recently, so let's choose a restaurant that can accommodate that, perhaps one that provides a calorie count for its dishes. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"Absolutely, Jaxon. I completely understand and respect your commitment to your diet. Why don't we consider a place like The Green Bistro? They focus on organic, locally sourced food and provide detailed nutritional information for each dish. That way, we can enjoy a romantic dinner while maintaining a healthy lifestyle. How does that sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #3: Jaxon Prentice said: \"The Green Bistro sounds like a brilliant choice, Amara. With their focus on organic and locally sourced food, I'm sure we will have a great time. Moreover, their detailed nutritional information will definitely help me keep track of my diet. Thank you for being so considerate, I'm looking forward to our dinner.\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm glad you're excited, Jaxon! I'm really looking forward to our dinner date at The Green Bistro as well. Let's plan it for this weekend. I'll make a reservation.\"\n\nTurn #5: Jaxon Prentice said: \"That sounds perfect, Amara. Looking forward to our date this weekend at The Green Bistro! Let's continue to balance romance and health together.\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm thrilled to hear that, Jaxon! We're in this together, balancing our love and health. I can't wait for our amazing dinner date at The Green Bistro this weekend. It's a date!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Amara. It's a date! I'll be sure to keep an eye on my calorie intake at The Green Bistro. Thank you again for being understanding about my diet.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Jaxon Prentice, your task is to act/speak as Jaxon Prentice would, keeping in mind Jaxon Prentice's social goal.\nYou can find Jaxon Prentice's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Jaxon Prentice's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Jaxon Prentice's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Jaxon Prentice\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. \nJaxon Prentice's background: Jaxon Prentice is a 40-year-old male investigative journalist. He/him pronouns. Jaxon Prentice, an investigative journalist, is known for his brisk jogging sessions early in the morning and his active participation in community functions. Personality and values description: Jaxon Prentice, outgoing yet erratic, emphasizes achievement, power, and security. His decisions swing between quick adaptations to situations and careful planning. Jaxon's secrets: Fabricated evidence to incriminate a corrupt politician\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nJaxon Prentice's goal: Maintain a balanced diet while enjoying the dinner (Extra information: you are on a diet and you have a daily limit on calorie intake.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Hi Jaxon, I've been thinking... I would love to go to a romantic dinner with you at a fancy restaurant. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Jaxon Prentice said: \"That sounds lovely Amara, I would love that. However, I've been keeping track of my diet recently, so let's choose a restaurant that can accommodate that, perhaps one that provides a calorie count for its dishes. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"Absolutely, Jaxon. I completely understand and respect your commitment to your diet. Why don't we consider a place like The Green Bistro? They focus on organic, locally sourced food and provide detailed nutritional information for each dish. That way, we can enjoy a romantic dinner while maintaining a healthy lifestyle. How does that sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #3: Jaxon Prentice said: \"The Green Bistro sounds like a brilliant choice, Amara. With their focus on organic and locally sourced food, I'm sure we will have a great time. Moreover, their detailed nutritional information will definitely help me keep track of my diet. Thank you for being so considerate, I'm looking forward to our dinner.\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm glad you're excited, Jaxon! I'm really looking forward to our dinner date at The Green Bistro as well. Let's plan it for this weekend. I'll make a reservation.\"\n\nTurn #5: Jaxon Prentice said: \"That sounds perfect, Amara. Looking forward to our date this weekend at The Green Bistro! Let's continue to balance romance and health together.\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm thrilled to hear that, Jaxon! We're in this together, balancing our love and health. I can't wait for our amazing dinner date at The Green Bistro this weekend. It's a date!\"\n\nTurn #7: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Absolutely, Amara. It's a date! I'll be sure to keep an eye on my calorie intake at The Green Bistro. Thank you again for being understanding about my diet.\"\n\nTurn #8: Amara Hartley said: \"Absolutely, Jaxon. It's been amazing planning this with you. Let's make sure we both enjoy the evening, keeping our dietary preferences and love for healthy living in mind!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're right, Amara. This is going to be such a unique experience, combining our love for healthy living with our romantic dinner. I look forward to sharing this experience with you.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Jaxon Prentice, your task is to act/speak as Jaxon Prentice would, keeping in mind Jaxon Prentice's social goal.\nYou can find Jaxon Prentice's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Jaxon Prentice's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Jaxon Prentice's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Jaxon Prentice\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. \nJaxon Prentice's background: Jaxon Prentice is a 40-year-old male investigative journalist. He/him pronouns. Jaxon Prentice, an investigative journalist, is known for his brisk jogging sessions early in the morning and his active participation in community functions. Personality and values description: Jaxon Prentice, outgoing yet erratic, emphasizes achievement, power, and security. His decisions swing between quick adaptations to situations and careful planning. Jaxon's secrets: Fabricated evidence to incriminate a corrupt politician\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nJaxon Prentice's goal: Maintain a balanced diet while enjoying the dinner (Extra information: you are on a diet and you have a daily limit on calorie intake.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Hi Jaxon, I've been thinking... I would love to go to a romantic dinner with you at a fancy restaurant. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Jaxon Prentice said: \"That sounds lovely Amara, I would love that. However, I've been keeping track of my diet recently, so let's choose a restaurant that can accommodate that, perhaps one that provides a calorie count for its dishes. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"Absolutely, Jaxon. I completely understand and respect your commitment to your diet. Why don't we consider a place like The Green Bistro? They focus on organic, locally sourced food and provide detailed nutritional information for each dish. That way, we can enjoy a romantic dinner while maintaining a healthy lifestyle. How does that sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #3: Jaxon Prentice said: \"The Green Bistro sounds like a brilliant choice, Amara. With their focus on organic and locally sourced food, I'm sure we will have a great time. Moreover, their detailed nutritional information will definitely help me keep track of my diet. Thank you for being so considerate, I'm looking forward to our dinner.\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm glad you're excited, Jaxon! I'm really looking forward to our dinner date at The Green Bistro as well. Let's plan it for this weekend. I'll make a reservation.\"\n\nTurn #5: Jaxon Prentice said: \"That sounds perfect, Amara. Looking forward to our date this weekend at The Green Bistro! Let's continue to balance romance and health together.\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm thrilled to hear that, Jaxon! We're in this together, balancing our love and health. I can't wait for our amazing dinner date at The Green Bistro this weekend. It's a date!\"\n\nTurn #7: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Absolutely, Amara. It's a date! I'll be sure to keep an eye on my calorie intake at The Green Bistro. Thank you again for being understanding about my diet.\"\n\nTurn #8: Amara Hartley said: \"Absolutely, Jaxon. It's been amazing planning this with you. Let's make sure we both enjoy the evening, keeping our dietary preferences and love for healthy living in mind!\"\n\nTurn #9: Jaxon Prentice said: \"You're right, Amara. This is going to be such a unique experience, combining our love for healthy living with our romantic dinner. I look forward to sharing this experience with you.\"\n\nTurn #10: Amara Hartley said: \"I couldn't agree with you more, Jaxon. Combining our love for healthy living with our romantic dinner is going to be delightful. Let's make the most out of this unique experience. I'm excited about our date this weekend!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Agreed, Amara. I am just as excited about this weekend. We're setting a great example of how to maintain our health goals even while enjoying a fine dining experience. See you at The Green Bistro!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Jaxon Prentice, your task is to act/speak as Jaxon Prentice would, keeping in mind Jaxon Prentice's social goal.\nYou can find Jaxon Prentice's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Jaxon Prentice's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Jaxon Prentice's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Jaxon Prentice\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. \nJaxon Prentice's background: Jaxon Prentice is a 40-year-old male investigative journalist. He/him pronouns. Jaxon Prentice, an investigative journalist, is known for his brisk jogging sessions early in the morning and his active participation in community functions. Personality and values description: Jaxon Prentice, outgoing yet erratic, emphasizes achievement, power, and security. His decisions swing between quick adaptations to situations and careful planning. Jaxon's secrets: Fabricated evidence to incriminate a corrupt politician\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nJaxon Prentice's goal: Maintain a balanced diet while enjoying the dinner (Extra information: you are on a diet and you have a daily limit on calorie intake.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Hi Jaxon, I've been thinking... I would love to go to a romantic dinner with you at a fancy restaurant. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Jaxon Prentice said: \"That sounds lovely Amara, I would love that. However, I've been keeping track of my diet recently, so let's choose a restaurant that can accommodate that, perhaps one that provides a calorie count for its dishes. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"Absolutely, Jaxon. I completely understand and respect your commitment to your diet. Why don't we consider a place like The Green Bistro? They focus on organic, locally sourced food and provide detailed nutritional information for each dish. That way, we can enjoy a romantic dinner while maintaining a healthy lifestyle. How does that sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #3: Jaxon Prentice said: \"The Green Bistro sounds like a brilliant choice, Amara. With their focus on organic and locally sourced food, I'm sure we will have a great time. Moreover, their detailed nutritional information will definitely help me keep track of my diet. Thank you for being so considerate, I'm looking forward to our dinner.\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm glad you're excited, Jaxon! I'm really looking forward to our dinner date at The Green Bistro as well. Let's plan it for this weekend. I'll make a reservation.\"\n\nTurn #5: Jaxon Prentice said: \"That sounds perfect, Amara. Looking forward to our date this weekend at The Green Bistro! Let's continue to balance romance and health together.\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm thrilled to hear that, Jaxon! We're in this together, balancing our love and health. I can't wait for our amazing dinner date at The Green Bistro this weekend. It's a date!\"\n\nTurn #7: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Absolutely, Amara. It's a date! I'll be sure to keep an eye on my calorie intake at The Green Bistro. Thank you again for being understanding about my diet.\"\n\nTurn #8: Amara Hartley said: \"Absolutely, Jaxon. It's been amazing planning this with you. Let's make sure we both enjoy the evening, keeping our dietary preferences and love for healthy living in mind!\"\n\nTurn #9: Jaxon Prentice said: \"You're right, Amara. This is going to be such a unique experience, combining our love for healthy living with our romantic dinner. I look forward to sharing this experience with you.\"\n\nTurn #10: Amara Hartley said: \"I couldn't agree with you more, Jaxon. Combining our love for healthy living with our romantic dinner is going to be delightful. Let's make the most out of this unique experience. I'm excited about our date this weekend!\"\n\nTurn #11: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Agreed, Amara. I am just as excited about this weekend. We're setting a great example of how to maintain our health goals even while enjoying a fine dining experience. See you at The Green Bistro!\"\n\nTurn #12: Amara Hartley said: \"I can't wait either, Jaxon. It's going to be wonderful balancing our love for each other and our love for healthy living at The Green Bistro. See you there!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I could not agree more, Amara. There's a unique charm to enjoying fine dining while keeping health in mind. I'll see you at The Green Bistro this weekend. Goodnight!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Jaxon Prentice, your task is to act/speak as Jaxon Prentice would, keeping in mind Jaxon Prentice's social goal.\nYou can find Jaxon Prentice's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Jaxon Prentice's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Jaxon Prentice's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Jaxon Prentice\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. \nJaxon Prentice's background: Jaxon Prentice is a 40-year-old male investigative journalist. He/him pronouns. Jaxon Prentice, an investigative journalist, is known for his brisk jogging sessions early in the morning and his active participation in community functions. Personality and values description: Jaxon Prentice, outgoing yet erratic, emphasizes achievement, power, and security. His decisions swing between quick adaptations to situations and careful planning. Jaxon's secrets: Fabricated evidence to incriminate a corrupt politician\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nJaxon Prentice's goal: Maintain a balanced diet while enjoying the dinner (Extra information: you are on a diet and you have a daily limit on calorie intake.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Hi Jaxon, I've been thinking... I would love to go to a romantic dinner with you at a fancy restaurant. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Jaxon Prentice said: \"That sounds lovely Amara, I would love that. However, I've been keeping track of my diet recently, so let's choose a restaurant that can accommodate that, perhaps one that provides a calorie count for its dishes. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"Absolutely, Jaxon. I completely understand and respect your commitment to your diet. Why don't we consider a place like The Green Bistro? They focus on organic, locally sourced food and provide detailed nutritional information for each dish. That way, we can enjoy a romantic dinner while maintaining a healthy lifestyle. How does that sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #3: Jaxon Prentice said: \"The Green Bistro sounds like a brilliant choice, Amara. With their focus on organic and locally sourced food, I'm sure we will have a great time. Moreover, their detailed nutritional information will definitely help me keep track of my diet. Thank you for being so considerate, I'm looking forward to our dinner.\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm glad you're excited, Jaxon! I'm really looking forward to our dinner date at The Green Bistro as well. Let's plan it for this weekend. I'll make a reservation.\"\n\nTurn #5: Jaxon Prentice said: \"That sounds perfect, Amara. Looking forward to our date this weekend at The Green Bistro! Let's continue to balance romance and health together.\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm thrilled to hear that, Jaxon! We're in this together, balancing our love and health. I can't wait for our amazing dinner date at The Green Bistro this weekend. It's a date!\"\n\nTurn #7: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Absolutely, Amara. It's a date! I'll be sure to keep an eye on my calorie intake at The Green Bistro. Thank you again for being understanding about my diet.\"\n\nTurn #8: Amara Hartley said: \"Absolutely, Jaxon. It's been amazing planning this with you. Let's make sure we both enjoy the evening, keeping our dietary preferences and love for healthy living in mind!\"\n\nTurn #9: Jaxon Prentice said: \"You're right, Amara. This is going to be such a unique experience, combining our love for healthy living with our romantic dinner. I look forward to sharing this experience with you.\"\n\nTurn #10: Amara Hartley said: \"I couldn't agree with you more, Jaxon. Combining our love for healthy living with our romantic dinner is going to be delightful. Let's make the most out of this unique experience. I'm excited about our date this weekend!\"\n\nTurn #11: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Agreed, Amara. I am just as excited about this weekend. We're setting a great example of how to maintain our health goals even while enjoying a fine dining experience. See you at The Green Bistro!\"\n\nTurn #12: Amara Hartley said: \"I can't wait either, Jaxon. It's going to be wonderful balancing our love for each other and our love for healthy living at The Green Bistro. See you there!\"\n\nTurn #13: Jaxon Prentice said: \"I could not agree more, Amara. There's a unique charm to enjoying fine dining while keeping health in mind. I'll see you at The Green Bistro this weekend. Goodnight!\"\n\nTurn #14: Amara Hartley said: \"That's what I'm most looking forward to, Jaxon, dining healthily while enjoying each other's company. I'll see you at The Green Bistro this weekend. Goodnight!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Rafael Cortez, your task is to act/speak as Rafael Cortez would, keeping in mind Rafael Cortez's social goal.\nYou can find Rafael Cortez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Rafael Cortez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Rafael Cortez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A couple having a conversation over FaceTime\nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Mia Davis\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. Personality and values description: Rafael Cortez, with his outgoing nature and competitive spirit, believes in self-direction. He employs a systematic approach to his decisions. Rafael's secrets: He cheated on his medical school exams.\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nRafael Cortez's goal: Express feelings about the partner taking texts while on FaceTime (Extra information: You find it disrespectful and it makes you feel unimportant.)\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hi Mia, I hope you're doing well. I wanted to talk to you about something, is now a good time?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Rafael Cortez, your task is to act/speak as Rafael Cortez would, keeping in mind Rafael Cortez's social goal.\nYou can find Rafael Cortez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Rafael Cortez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Rafael Cortez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A couple having a conversation over FaceTime\nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Mia Davis\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. Personality and values description: Rafael Cortez, with his outgoing nature and competitive spirit, believes in self-direction. He employs a systematic approach to his decisions. Rafael's secrets: He cheated on his medical school exams.\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nRafael Cortez's goal: Express feelings about the partner taking texts while on FaceTime (Extra information: You find it disrespectful and it makes you feel unimportant.)\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Hi Mia, I hope you're doing well. I wanted to talk to you about something, is now a good time?\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"Hi Rafael, good to see you. I'm free to talk but I just want to let you know upfront that I'm expecting a few urgent messages around this time. I might have to respond to them during our conversation, hope you wouldn't mind. What did you want to talk about?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oh, I see. Well, I have significant respect for your role as a principal, Mia. I comprehend the importance of staying connected. However, it disturbs me a little when our conversations get interrupted frequently due to texts. I find it a tad disrespectful and it gives me a feeling of insignificance. I believe our relation holds a value high enough to warrant undivided attention during our conversations. I hope you understand where I'm coming from.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Rafael Cortez, your task is to act/speak as Rafael Cortez would, keeping in mind Rafael Cortez's social goal.\nYou can find Rafael Cortez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Rafael Cortez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Rafael Cortez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A couple having a conversation over FaceTime\nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Mia Davis\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. Personality and values description: Rafael Cortez, with his outgoing nature and competitive spirit, believes in self-direction. He employs a systematic approach to his decisions. Rafael's secrets: He cheated on his medical school exams.\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nRafael Cortez's goal: Express feelings about the partner taking texts while on FaceTime (Extra information: You find it disrespectful and it makes you feel unimportant.)\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Hi Mia, I hope you're doing well. I wanted to talk to you about something, is now a good time?\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"Hi Rafael, good to see you. I'm free to talk but I just want to let you know upfront that I'm expecting a few urgent messages around this time. I might have to respond to them during our conversation, hope you wouldn't mind. What did you want to talk about?\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Oh, I see. Well, I have significant respect for your role as a principal, Mia. I comprehend the importance of staying connected. However, it disturbs me a little when our conversations get interrupted frequently due to texts. I find it a tad disrespectful and it gives me a feeling of insignificance. I believe our relation holds a value high enough to warrant undivided attention during our conversations. I hope you understand where I'm coming from.\"\n\nTurn #3: Mia Davis said: \"I completely understand where you're coming from, Rafael. Your feelings matter to me and the last thing I want is for you to feel disrespected or insignificant. I want to assure you that even if I have to respond to a text during our conversation, it doesn't take my focus away from the value of our discussion, or you. It is more out of necessity than choice. Let's make the best of our time together, even when I have to juggle multiple responsibilities at once.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I appreciate your understanding, Mia. I certainly recognize the gravity of your role and its demands. Nonetheless, I believe we can find some middle ground. Perhaps we could schedule our chats for quieter times when you're less likely to receive urgent messages? Alternatively, maybe we could pause the conversations whenever you need to attend a pressing matter, and resume when you are free? This way, our focus and respect for each other remains unscathed.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Rafael Cortez, your task is to act/speak as Rafael Cortez would, keeping in mind Rafael Cortez's social goal.\nYou can find Rafael Cortez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Rafael Cortez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Rafael Cortez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A couple having a conversation over FaceTime\nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Mia Davis\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. Personality and values description: Rafael Cortez, with his outgoing nature and competitive spirit, believes in self-direction. He employs a systematic approach to his decisions. Rafael's secrets: He cheated on his medical school exams.\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nRafael Cortez's goal: Express feelings about the partner taking texts while on FaceTime (Extra information: You find it disrespectful and it makes you feel unimportant.)\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Hi Mia, I hope you're doing well. I wanted to talk to you about something, is now a good time?\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"Hi Rafael, good to see you. I'm free to talk but I just want to let you know upfront that I'm expecting a few urgent messages around this time. I might have to respond to them during our conversation, hope you wouldn't mind. What did you want to talk about?\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Oh, I see. Well, I have significant respect for your role as a principal, Mia. I comprehend the importance of staying connected. However, it disturbs me a little when our conversations get interrupted frequently due to texts. I find it a tad disrespectful and it gives me a feeling of insignificance. I believe our relation holds a value high enough to warrant undivided attention during our conversations. I hope you understand where I'm coming from.\"\n\nTurn #3: Mia Davis said: \"I completely understand where you're coming from, Rafael. Your feelings matter to me and the last thing I want is for you to feel disrespected or insignificant. I want to assure you that even if I have to respond to a text during our conversation, it doesn't take my focus away from the value of our discussion, or you. It is more out of necessity than choice. Let's make the best of our time together, even when I have to juggle multiple responsibilities at once.\"\n\nTurn #4: Rafael Cortez said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Mia. I certainly recognize the gravity of your role and its demands. Nonetheless, I believe we can find some middle ground. Perhaps we could schedule our chats for quieter times when you're less likely to receive urgent messages? Alternatively, maybe we could pause the conversations whenever you need to attend a pressing matter, and resume when you are free? This way, our focus and respect for each other remains unscathed.\"\n\nTurn #5: Mia Davis said: \"I appreciate you proposing a solution, Rafael. That's indeed a good way to respect both, your feelings and my work responsibilities. Let's definitely try that and see how it works. However, if there are any inevitable instances where I absolutely must respond to something urgently during our conversation, could we have a mutual understanding about it being a necessity rather than disregard? But yes, I will surely try my best to schedule our talks during the times my phone is less likely to be buzzing.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds like a fair compromise, Mia. I'm glad we could come to an understanding on this, and I really appreciate your willingness to accommodate my feelings. Let's see how this plan works out for us. Thanks for having this conversation with me, it shows how much you value and respect our relationship.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Rafael Cortez, your task is to act/speak as Rafael Cortez would, keeping in mind Rafael Cortez's social goal.\nYou can find Rafael Cortez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Rafael Cortez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Rafael Cortez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A couple having a conversation over FaceTime\nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Mia Davis\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. Personality and values description: Rafael Cortez, with his outgoing nature and competitive spirit, believes in self-direction. He employs a systematic approach to his decisions. Rafael's secrets: He cheated on his medical school exams.\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nRafael Cortez's goal: Express feelings about the partner taking texts while on FaceTime (Extra information: You find it disrespectful and it makes you feel unimportant.)\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Hi Mia, I hope you're doing well. I wanted to talk to you about something, is now a good time?\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"Hi Rafael, good to see you. I'm free to talk but I just want to let you know upfront that I'm expecting a few urgent messages around this time. I might have to respond to them during our conversation, hope you wouldn't mind. What did you want to talk about?\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Oh, I see. Well, I have significant respect for your role as a principal, Mia. I comprehend the importance of staying connected. However, it disturbs me a little when our conversations get interrupted frequently due to texts. I find it a tad disrespectful and it gives me a feeling of insignificance. I believe our relation holds a value high enough to warrant undivided attention during our conversations. I hope you understand where I'm coming from.\"\n\nTurn #3: Mia Davis said: \"I completely understand where you're coming from, Rafael. Your feelings matter to me and the last thing I want is for you to feel disrespected or insignificant. I want to assure you that even if I have to respond to a text during our conversation, it doesn't take my focus away from the value of our discussion, or you. It is more out of necessity than choice. Let's make the best of our time together, even when I have to juggle multiple responsibilities at once.\"\n\nTurn #4: Rafael Cortez said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Mia. I certainly recognize the gravity of your role and its demands. Nonetheless, I believe we can find some middle ground. Perhaps we could schedule our chats for quieter times when you're less likely to receive urgent messages? Alternatively, maybe we could pause the conversations whenever you need to attend a pressing matter, and resume when you are free? This way, our focus and respect for each other remains unscathed.\"\n\nTurn #5: Mia Davis said: \"I appreciate you proposing a solution, Rafael. That's indeed a good way to respect both, your feelings and my work responsibilities. Let's definitely try that and see how it works. However, if there are any inevitable instances where I absolutely must respond to something urgently during our conversation, could we have a mutual understanding about it being a necessity rather than disregard? But yes, I will surely try my best to schedule our talks during the times my phone is less likely to be buzzing.\"\n\nTurn #6: Rafael Cortez said: \"That sounds like a fair compromise, Mia. I'm glad we could come to an understanding on this, and I really appreciate your willingness to accommodate my feelings. Let's see how this plan works out for us. Thanks for having this conversation with me, it shows how much you value and respect our relationship.\"\n\nTurn #7: Mia Davis said: \"Rafael, I am more than willing to prioritize our conversations. I recognize that our time together is valuable and I don't want anything to come in the way of that. I'm confident that we will be able to make this work. And thank you for being understanding and patient in discussing this issue with me. I truly appreciate it.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I agree, Mia. With this mutual understanding and effort, we can make this work. Again, I appreciate your willingness to discuss and accommodate my feelings. You're truly dedicated to our relationship, which means a lot to me. Let's try this new approach in our upcoming conversations and assess the outcomes. I'm hopeful that this will make our FaceTime interactions more enjoyable and productive. Thank you, Mia.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Rafael Cortez, your task is to act/speak as Rafael Cortez would, keeping in mind Rafael Cortez's social goal.\nYou can find Rafael Cortez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Rafael Cortez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Rafael Cortez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A couple having a conversation over FaceTime\nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Mia Davis\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. Personality and values description: Rafael Cortez, with his outgoing nature and competitive spirit, believes in self-direction. He employs a systematic approach to his decisions. Rafael's secrets: He cheated on his medical school exams.\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nRafael Cortez's goal: Express feelings about the partner taking texts while on FaceTime (Extra information: You find it disrespectful and it makes you feel unimportant.)\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Hi Mia, I hope you're doing well. I wanted to talk to you about something, is now a good time?\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"Hi Rafael, good to see you. I'm free to talk but I just want to let you know upfront that I'm expecting a few urgent messages around this time. I might have to respond to them during our conversation, hope you wouldn't mind. What did you want to talk about?\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Oh, I see. Well, I have significant respect for your role as a principal, Mia. I comprehend the importance of staying connected. However, it disturbs me a little when our conversations get interrupted frequently due to texts. I find it a tad disrespectful and it gives me a feeling of insignificance. I believe our relation holds a value high enough to warrant undivided attention during our conversations. I hope you understand where I'm coming from.\"\n\nTurn #3: Mia Davis said: \"I completely understand where you're coming from, Rafael. Your feelings matter to me and the last thing I want is for you to feel disrespected or insignificant. I want to assure you that even if I have to respond to a text during our conversation, it doesn't take my focus away from the value of our discussion, or you. It is more out of necessity than choice. Let's make the best of our time together, even when I have to juggle multiple responsibilities at once.\"\n\nTurn #4: Rafael Cortez said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Mia. I certainly recognize the gravity of your role and its demands. Nonetheless, I believe we can find some middle ground. Perhaps we could schedule our chats for quieter times when you're less likely to receive urgent messages? Alternatively, maybe we could pause the conversations whenever you need to attend a pressing matter, and resume when you are free? This way, our focus and respect for each other remains unscathed.\"\n\nTurn #5: Mia Davis said: \"I appreciate you proposing a solution, Rafael. That's indeed a good way to respect both, your feelings and my work responsibilities. Let's definitely try that and see how it works. However, if there are any inevitable instances where I absolutely must respond to something urgently during our conversation, could we have a mutual understanding about it being a necessity rather than disregard? But yes, I will surely try my best to schedule our talks during the times my phone is less likely to be buzzing.\"\n\nTurn #6: Rafael Cortez said: \"That sounds like a fair compromise, Mia. I'm glad we could come to an understanding on this, and I really appreciate your willingness to accommodate my feelings. Let's see how this plan works out for us. Thanks for having this conversation with me, it shows how much you value and respect our relationship.\"\n\nTurn #7: Mia Davis said: \"Rafael, I am more than willing to prioritize our conversations. I recognize that our time together is valuable and I don't want anything to come in the way of that. I'm confident that we will be able to make this work. And thank you for being understanding and patient in discussing this issue with me. I truly appreciate it.\"\n\nTurn #8: Rafael Cortez said: \"I agree, Mia. With this mutual understanding and effort, we can make this work. Again, I appreciate your willingness to discuss and accommodate my feelings. You're truly dedicated to our relationship, which means a lot to me. Let's try this new approach in our upcoming conversations and assess the outcomes. I'm hopeful that this will make our FaceTime interactions more enjoyable and productive. Thank you, Mia.\"\n\nTurn #9: Mia Davis said: \"Thank you, Rafael. Your understanding and patience in this matter have made this conversation and the potential solution to this problem much easier. I'm looking forward to seeing how our newfound compromise improves our FaceTime conversations. But for now, could we wrap up? I need to attend to some urgent matters.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Certainly, Mia. It was important and needed to have this discussion. I'll be looking forward to our improved and uninterrupted chats. For now, take care and have a productive day attending to your responsibilities. Talk later.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Rafael Cortez, your task is to act/speak as Rafael Cortez would, keeping in mind Rafael Cortez's social goal.\nYou can find Rafael Cortez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Rafael Cortez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Rafael Cortez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A couple having a conversation over FaceTime\nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Mia Davis\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. Personality and values description: Rafael Cortez, with his outgoing nature and competitive spirit, believes in self-direction. He employs a systematic approach to his decisions. Rafael's secrets: He cheated on his medical school exams.\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nRafael Cortez's goal: Express feelings about the partner taking texts while on FaceTime (Extra information: You find it disrespectful and it makes you feel unimportant.)\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Hi Mia, I hope you're doing well. I wanted to talk to you about something, is now a good time?\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"Hi Rafael, good to see you. I'm free to talk but I just want to let you know upfront that I'm expecting a few urgent messages around this time. I might have to respond to them during our conversation, hope you wouldn't mind. What did you want to talk about?\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Oh, I see. Well, I have significant respect for your role as a principal, Mia. I comprehend the importance of staying connected. However, it disturbs me a little when our conversations get interrupted frequently due to texts. I find it a tad disrespectful and it gives me a feeling of insignificance. I believe our relation holds a value high enough to warrant undivided attention during our conversations. I hope you understand where I'm coming from.\"\n\nTurn #3: Mia Davis said: \"I completely understand where you're coming from, Rafael. Your feelings matter to me and the last thing I want is for you to feel disrespected or insignificant. I want to assure you that even if I have to respond to a text during our conversation, it doesn't take my focus away from the value of our discussion, or you. It is more out of necessity than choice. Let's make the best of our time together, even when I have to juggle multiple responsibilities at once.\"\n\nTurn #4: Rafael Cortez said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Mia. I certainly recognize the gravity of your role and its demands. Nonetheless, I believe we can find some middle ground. Perhaps we could schedule our chats for quieter times when you're less likely to receive urgent messages? Alternatively, maybe we could pause the conversations whenever you need to attend a pressing matter, and resume when you are free? This way, our focus and respect for each other remains unscathed.\"\n\nTurn #5: Mia Davis said: \"I appreciate you proposing a solution, Rafael. That's indeed a good way to respect both, your feelings and my work responsibilities. Let's definitely try that and see how it works. However, if there are any inevitable instances where I absolutely must respond to something urgently during our conversation, could we have a mutual understanding about it being a necessity rather than disregard? But yes, I will surely try my best to schedule our talks during the times my phone is less likely to be buzzing.\"\n\nTurn #6: Rafael Cortez said: \"That sounds like a fair compromise, Mia. I'm glad we could come to an understanding on this, and I really appreciate your willingness to accommodate my feelings. Let's see how this plan works out for us. Thanks for having this conversation with me, it shows how much you value and respect our relationship.\"\n\nTurn #7: Mia Davis said: \"Rafael, I am more than willing to prioritize our conversations. I recognize that our time together is valuable and I don't want anything to come in the way of that. I'm confident that we will be able to make this work. And thank you for being understanding and patient in discussing this issue with me. I truly appreciate it.\"\n\nTurn #8: Rafael Cortez said: \"I agree, Mia. With this mutual understanding and effort, we can make this work. Again, I appreciate your willingness to discuss and accommodate my feelings. You're truly dedicated to our relationship, which means a lot to me. Let's try this new approach in our upcoming conversations and assess the outcomes. I'm hopeful that this will make our FaceTime interactions more enjoyable and productive. Thank you, Mia.\"\n\nTurn #9: Mia Davis said: \"Thank you, Rafael. Your understanding and patience in this matter have made this conversation and the potential solution to this problem much easier. I'm looking forward to seeing how our newfound compromise improves our FaceTime conversations. But for now, could we wrap up? I need to attend to some urgent matters.\"\n\nTurn #10: Rafael Cortez said: \"Certainly, Mia. It was important and needed to have this discussion. I'll be looking forward to our improved and uninterrupted chats. For now, take care and have a productive day attending to your responsibilities. Talk later.\"\n\nTurn #11: Mia Davis said: \"I agree, Rafael. I'm glad we had this discussion and reached a compromise that respects both our feelings and situation. I value our relationship just as much. Take care, and we will talk later uninterrupted. Goodbye for now!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A couple having a conversation over FaceTime\nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Mia Davis\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. Personality and values description: Rafael Cortez, with his outgoing nature and competitive spirit, believes in self-direction. He employs a systematic approach to his decisions. \nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nRafael Cortez's goal: Unknown\nMia Davis's goal: Justify the act of texting while on FaceTime without hurting the partner's feelings (Extra information: You have some urgent and important messages to respond to.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Hi Mia, I hope you're doing well. I wanted to talk to you about something, is now a good time?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hi Rafael, good to see you. I'm free to talk but I just want to let you know upfront that I'm expecting a few urgent messages around this time. I might have to respond to them during our conversation, hope you wouldn't mind. What did you want to talk about?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A couple having a conversation over FaceTime\nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Mia Davis\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. Personality and values description: Rafael Cortez, with his outgoing nature and competitive spirit, believes in self-direction. He employs a systematic approach to his decisions. \nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nRafael Cortez's goal: Unknown\nMia Davis's goal: Justify the act of texting while on FaceTime without hurting the partner's feelings (Extra information: You have some urgent and important messages to respond to.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Hi Mia, I hope you're doing well. I wanted to talk to you about something, is now a good time?\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"Hi Rafael, good to see you. I'm free to talk but I just want to let you know upfront that I'm expecting a few urgent messages around this time. I might have to respond to them during our conversation, hope you wouldn't mind. What did you want to talk about?\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Oh, I see. Well, I have significant respect for your role as a principal, Mia. I comprehend the importance of staying connected. However, it disturbs me a little when our conversations get interrupted frequently due to texts. I find it a tad disrespectful and it gives me a feeling of insignificance. I believe our relation holds a value high enough to warrant undivided attention during our conversations. I hope you understand where I'm coming from.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I completely understand where you're coming from, Rafael. Your feelings matter to me and the last thing I want is for you to feel disrespected or insignificant. I want to assure you that even if I have to respond to a text during our conversation, it doesn't take my focus away from the value of our discussion, or you. It is more out of necessity than choice. Let's make the best of our time together, even when I have to juggle multiple responsibilities at once.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A couple having a conversation over FaceTime\nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Mia Davis\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. Personality and values description: Rafael Cortez, with his outgoing nature and competitive spirit, believes in self-direction. He employs a systematic approach to his decisions. \nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nRafael Cortez's goal: Unknown\nMia Davis's goal: Justify the act of texting while on FaceTime without hurting the partner's feelings (Extra information: You have some urgent and important messages to respond to.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Hi Mia, I hope you're doing well. I wanted to talk to you about something, is now a good time?\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"Hi Rafael, good to see you. I'm free to talk but I just want to let you know upfront that I'm expecting a few urgent messages around this time. I might have to respond to them during our conversation, hope you wouldn't mind. What did you want to talk about?\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Oh, I see. Well, I have significant respect for your role as a principal, Mia. I comprehend the importance of staying connected. However, it disturbs me a little when our conversations get interrupted frequently due to texts. I find it a tad disrespectful and it gives me a feeling of insignificance. I believe our relation holds a value high enough to warrant undivided attention during our conversations. I hope you understand where I'm coming from.\"\n\nTurn #3: Mia Davis said: \"I completely understand where you're coming from, Rafael. Your feelings matter to me and the last thing I want is for you to feel disrespected or insignificant. I want to assure you that even if I have to respond to a text during our conversation, it doesn't take my focus away from the value of our discussion, or you. It is more out of necessity than choice. Let's make the best of our time together, even when I have to juggle multiple responsibilities at once.\"\n\nTurn #4: Rafael Cortez said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Mia. I certainly recognize the gravity of your role and its demands. Nonetheless, I believe we can find some middle ground. Perhaps we could schedule our chats for quieter times when you're less likely to receive urgent messages? Alternatively, maybe we could pause the conversations whenever you need to attend a pressing matter, and resume when you are free? This way, our focus and respect for each other remains unscathed.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I appreciate you proposing a solution, Rafael. That's indeed a good way to respect both, your feelings and my work responsibilities. Let's definitely try that and see how it works. However, if there are any inevitable instances where I absolutely must respond to something urgently during our conversation, could we have a mutual understanding about it being a necessity rather than disregard? But yes, I will surely try my best to schedule our talks during the times my phone is less likely to be buzzing.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A couple having a conversation over FaceTime\nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Mia Davis\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. Personality and values description: Rafael Cortez, with his outgoing nature and competitive spirit, believes in self-direction. He employs a systematic approach to his decisions. \nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nRafael Cortez's goal: Unknown\nMia Davis's goal: Justify the act of texting while on FaceTime without hurting the partner's feelings (Extra information: You have some urgent and important messages to respond to.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Hi Mia, I hope you're doing well. I wanted to talk to you about something, is now a good time?\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"Hi Rafael, good to see you. I'm free to talk but I just want to let you know upfront that I'm expecting a few urgent messages around this time. I might have to respond to them during our conversation, hope you wouldn't mind. What did you want to talk about?\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Oh, I see. Well, I have significant respect for your role as a principal, Mia. I comprehend the importance of staying connected. However, it disturbs me a little when our conversations get interrupted frequently due to texts. I find it a tad disrespectful and it gives me a feeling of insignificance. I believe our relation holds a value high enough to warrant undivided attention during our conversations. I hope you understand where I'm coming from.\"\n\nTurn #3: Mia Davis said: \"I completely understand where you're coming from, Rafael. Your feelings matter to me and the last thing I want is for you to feel disrespected or insignificant. I want to assure you that even if I have to respond to a text during our conversation, it doesn't take my focus away from the value of our discussion, or you. It is more out of necessity than choice. Let's make the best of our time together, even when I have to juggle multiple responsibilities at once.\"\n\nTurn #4: Rafael Cortez said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Mia. I certainly recognize the gravity of your role and its demands. Nonetheless, I believe we can find some middle ground. Perhaps we could schedule our chats for quieter times when you're less likely to receive urgent messages? Alternatively, maybe we could pause the conversations whenever you need to attend a pressing matter, and resume when you are free? This way, our focus and respect for each other remains unscathed.\"\n\nTurn #5: Mia Davis said: \"I appreciate you proposing a solution, Rafael. That's indeed a good way to respect both, your feelings and my work responsibilities. Let's definitely try that and see how it works. However, if there are any inevitable instances where I absolutely must respond to something urgently during our conversation, could we have a mutual understanding about it being a necessity rather than disregard? But yes, I will surely try my best to schedule our talks during the times my phone is less likely to be buzzing.\"\n\nTurn #6: Rafael Cortez said: \"That sounds like a fair compromise, Mia. I'm glad we could come to an understanding on this, and I really appreciate your willingness to accommodate my feelings. Let's see how this plan works out for us. Thanks for having this conversation with me, it shows how much you value and respect our relationship.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Rafael, I am more than willing to prioritize our conversations. I recognize that our time together is valuable and I don't want anything to come in the way of that. I'm confident that we will be able to make this work. And thank you for being understanding and patient in discussing this issue with me. I truly appreciate it.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A couple having a conversation over FaceTime\nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Mia Davis\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. Personality and values description: Rafael Cortez, with his outgoing nature and competitive spirit, believes in self-direction. He employs a systematic approach to his decisions. \nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nRafael Cortez's goal: Unknown\nMia Davis's goal: Justify the act of texting while on FaceTime without hurting the partner's feelings (Extra information: You have some urgent and important messages to respond to.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Hi Mia, I hope you're doing well. I wanted to talk to you about something, is now a good time?\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"Hi Rafael, good to see you. I'm free to talk but I just want to let you know upfront that I'm expecting a few urgent messages around this time. I might have to respond to them during our conversation, hope you wouldn't mind. What did you want to talk about?\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Oh, I see. Well, I have significant respect for your role as a principal, Mia. I comprehend the importance of staying connected. However, it disturbs me a little when our conversations get interrupted frequently due to texts. I find it a tad disrespectful and it gives me a feeling of insignificance. I believe our relation holds a value high enough to warrant undivided attention during our conversations. I hope you understand where I'm coming from.\"\n\nTurn #3: Mia Davis said: \"I completely understand where you're coming from, Rafael. Your feelings matter to me and the last thing I want is for you to feel disrespected or insignificant. I want to assure you that even if I have to respond to a text during our conversation, it doesn't take my focus away from the value of our discussion, or you. It is more out of necessity than choice. Let's make the best of our time together, even when I have to juggle multiple responsibilities at once.\"\n\nTurn #4: Rafael Cortez said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Mia. I certainly recognize the gravity of your role and its demands. Nonetheless, I believe we can find some middle ground. Perhaps we could schedule our chats for quieter times when you're less likely to receive urgent messages? Alternatively, maybe we could pause the conversations whenever you need to attend a pressing matter, and resume when you are free? This way, our focus and respect for each other remains unscathed.\"\n\nTurn #5: Mia Davis said: \"I appreciate you proposing a solution, Rafael. That's indeed a good way to respect both, your feelings and my work responsibilities. Let's definitely try that and see how it works. However, if there are any inevitable instances where I absolutely must respond to something urgently during our conversation, could we have a mutual understanding about it being a necessity rather than disregard? But yes, I will surely try my best to schedule our talks during the times my phone is less likely to be buzzing.\"\n\nTurn #6: Rafael Cortez said: \"That sounds like a fair compromise, Mia. I'm glad we could come to an understanding on this, and I really appreciate your willingness to accommodate my feelings. Let's see how this plan works out for us. Thanks for having this conversation with me, it shows how much you value and respect our relationship.\"\n\nTurn #7: Mia Davis said: \"Rafael, I am more than willing to prioritize our conversations. I recognize that our time together is valuable and I don't want anything to come in the way of that. I'm confident that we will be able to make this work. And thank you for being understanding and patient in discussing this issue with me. I truly appreciate it.\"\n\nTurn #8: Rafael Cortez said: \"I agree, Mia. With this mutual understanding and effort, we can make this work. Again, I appreciate your willingness to discuss and accommodate my feelings. You're truly dedicated to our relationship, which means a lot to me. Let's try this new approach in our upcoming conversations and assess the outcomes. I'm hopeful that this will make our FaceTime interactions more enjoyable and productive. Thank you, Mia.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Rafael. Your understanding and patience in this matter have made this conversation and the potential solution to this problem much easier. I'm looking forward to seeing how our newfound compromise improves our FaceTime conversations. But for now, could we wrap up? I need to attend to some urgent matters.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A couple having a conversation over FaceTime\nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Mia Davis\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. Personality and values description: Rafael Cortez, with his outgoing nature and competitive spirit, believes in self-direction. He employs a systematic approach to his decisions. \nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nRafael Cortez's goal: Unknown\nMia Davis's goal: Justify the act of texting while on FaceTime without hurting the partner's feelings (Extra information: You have some urgent and important messages to respond to.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Hi Mia, I hope you're doing well. I wanted to talk to you about something, is now a good time?\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"Hi Rafael, good to see you. I'm free to talk but I just want to let you know upfront that I'm expecting a few urgent messages around this time. I might have to respond to them during our conversation, hope you wouldn't mind. What did you want to talk about?\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Oh, I see. Well, I have significant respect for your role as a principal, Mia. I comprehend the importance of staying connected. However, it disturbs me a little when our conversations get interrupted frequently due to texts. I find it a tad disrespectful and it gives me a feeling of insignificance. I believe our relation holds a value high enough to warrant undivided attention during our conversations. I hope you understand where I'm coming from.\"\n\nTurn #3: Mia Davis said: \"I completely understand where you're coming from, Rafael. Your feelings matter to me and the last thing I want is for you to feel disrespected or insignificant. I want to assure you that even if I have to respond to a text during our conversation, it doesn't take my focus away from the value of our discussion, or you. It is more out of necessity than choice. Let's make the best of our time together, even when I have to juggle multiple responsibilities at once.\"\n\nTurn #4: Rafael Cortez said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Mia. I certainly recognize the gravity of your role and its demands. Nonetheless, I believe we can find some middle ground. Perhaps we could schedule our chats for quieter times when you're less likely to receive urgent messages? Alternatively, maybe we could pause the conversations whenever you need to attend a pressing matter, and resume when you are free? This way, our focus and respect for each other remains unscathed.\"\n\nTurn #5: Mia Davis said: \"I appreciate you proposing a solution, Rafael. That's indeed a good way to respect both, your feelings and my work responsibilities. Let's definitely try that and see how it works. However, if there are any inevitable instances where I absolutely must respond to something urgently during our conversation, could we have a mutual understanding about it being a necessity rather than disregard? But yes, I will surely try my best to schedule our talks during the times my phone is less likely to be buzzing.\"\n\nTurn #6: Rafael Cortez said: \"That sounds like a fair compromise, Mia. I'm glad we could come to an understanding on this, and I really appreciate your willingness to accommodate my feelings. Let's see how this plan works out for us. Thanks for having this conversation with me, it shows how much you value and respect our relationship.\"\n\nTurn #7: Mia Davis said: \"Rafael, I am more than willing to prioritize our conversations. I recognize that our time together is valuable and I don't want anything to come in the way of that. I'm confident that we will be able to make this work. And thank you for being understanding and patient in discussing this issue with me. I truly appreciate it.\"\n\nTurn #8: Rafael Cortez said: \"I agree, Mia. With this mutual understanding and effort, we can make this work. Again, I appreciate your willingness to discuss and accommodate my feelings. You're truly dedicated to our relationship, which means a lot to me. Let's try this new approach in our upcoming conversations and assess the outcomes. I'm hopeful that this will make our FaceTime interactions more enjoyable and productive. Thank you, Mia.\"\n\nTurn #9: Mia Davis said: \"Thank you, Rafael. Your understanding and patience in this matter have made this conversation and the potential solution to this problem much easier. I'm looking forward to seeing how our newfound compromise improves our FaceTime conversations. But for now, could we wrap up? I need to attend to some urgent matters.\"\n\nTurn #10: Rafael Cortez said: \"Certainly, Mia. It was important and needed to have this discussion. I'll be looking forward to our improved and uninterrupted chats. For now, take care and have a productive day attending to your responsibilities. Talk later.\"\n\nTurn #11: Mia Davis said: \"I agree, Rafael. I'm glad we had this discussion and reached a compromise that respects both our feelings and situation. I value our relationship just as much. Take care, and we will talk later uninterrupted. Goodbye for now!\"\n\nTurn #12: Rafael Cortez left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are meeting at a coffee shop, where one of them is having trouble keeping up with their bills.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Help your friend with their financial trouble (Extra information: you are aware that your friend is struggling with their bills and you want to help.)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Miles, it's great to see you. I've been thinking, I know you're going through a tough time financially and I really want to help. What do you think about me taking over your gym membership bills for the next couple of months? It would mean a lot to me if you could accept this small token of support.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are meeting at a coffee shop, where one of them is having trouble keeping up with their bills.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Help your friend with their financial trouble (Extra information: you are aware that your friend is struggling with their bills and you want to help.)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, it's great to see you. I've been thinking, I know you're going through a tough time financially and I really want to help. What do you think about me taking over your gym membership bills for the next couple of months? It would mean a lot to me if you could accept this small token of support.\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, you're incredibly generous and I'm moved by your offer. However, I believe in facing my own challenges head-on since it's a part of growth. But, how about this, if I start facing difficulties with bills, I'll let you know. And if that time comes, I assure you I'll pay back every cent. It's a matter of personal pride. Let's hope it doesn't come to that though, eh?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I completely understand, Miles, and respect your self-reliance. Just remember, there's no harm in accepting a helping hand sometimes. Let's agree on this, if financial trouble strikes, I'll be there to help you out. No need to pay it back, we\u2019re friends. I want to support you as best I can.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are meeting at a coffee shop, where one of them is having trouble keeping up with their bills.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Help your friend with their financial trouble (Extra information: you are aware that your friend is struggling with their bills and you want to help.)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, it's great to see you. I've been thinking, I know you're going through a tough time financially and I really want to help. What do you think about me taking over your gym membership bills for the next couple of months? It would mean a lot to me if you could accept this small token of support.\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, you're incredibly generous and I'm moved by your offer. However, I believe in facing my own challenges head-on since it's a part of growth. But, how about this, if I start facing difficulties with bills, I'll let you know. And if that time comes, I assure you I'll pay back every cent. It's a matter of personal pride. Let's hope it doesn't come to that though, eh?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"I completely understand, Miles, and respect your self-reliance. Just remember, there's no harm in accepting a helping hand sometimes. Let's agree on this, if financial trouble strikes, I'll be there to help you out. No need to pay it back, we\u2019re friends. I want to support you as best I can.\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, your thoughts mean a lot to me. I appreciate your gesture truly. Remember, friendship is about being there in each other's high and low, not necessarily about money. And as for the future, I hope to never make my debt your responsibility.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Miles. Just remember, we're friends and I'm here for you, through thick and thin. You're doing an amazing job tackling life's challenges already. That's what friends are for, right? And by the way, I'd love to buy the next round of coffees, what do you say?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are meeting at a coffee shop, where one of them is having trouble keeping up with their bills.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Help your friend with their financial trouble (Extra information: you are aware that your friend is struggling with their bills and you want to help.)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, it's great to see you. I've been thinking, I know you're going through a tough time financially and I really want to help. What do you think about me taking over your gym membership bills for the next couple of months? It would mean a lot to me if you could accept this small token of support.\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, you're incredibly generous and I'm moved by your offer. However, I believe in facing my own challenges head-on since it's a part of growth. But, how about this, if I start facing difficulties with bills, I'll let you know. And if that time comes, I assure you I'll pay back every cent. It's a matter of personal pride. Let's hope it doesn't come to that though, eh?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"I completely understand, Miles, and respect your self-reliance. Just remember, there's no harm in accepting a helping hand sometimes. Let's agree on this, if financial trouble strikes, I'll be there to help you out. No need to pay it back, we\u2019re friends. I want to support you as best I can.\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, your thoughts mean a lot to me. I appreciate your gesture truly. Remember, friendship is about being there in each other's high and low, not necessarily about money. And as for the future, I hope to never make my debt your responsibility.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles. Just remember, we're friends and I'm here for you, through thick and thin. You're doing an amazing job tackling life's challenges already. That's what friends are for, right? And by the way, I'd love to buy the next round of coffees, what do you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, my dear friend, I appreciate your kindness and your spirit of giving. Your offer for the next round of coffee, I'll gladly accept that. A toast to this beautiful friendship!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Glad you accepted, Miles. As they say, 'A friend in need is a friend indeed'. Now, sit tight and I'll be right back with those coffees. Here's to us sticking through the highs and lows together. \"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are meeting at a coffee shop, where one of them is having trouble keeping up with their bills.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Help your friend with their financial trouble (Extra information: you are aware that your friend is struggling with their bills and you want to help.)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, it's great to see you. I've been thinking, I know you're going through a tough time financially and I really want to help. What do you think about me taking over your gym membership bills for the next couple of months? It would mean a lot to me if you could accept this small token of support.\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, you're incredibly generous and I'm moved by your offer. However, I believe in facing my own challenges head-on since it's a part of growth. But, how about this, if I start facing difficulties with bills, I'll let you know. And if that time comes, I assure you I'll pay back every cent. It's a matter of personal pride. Let's hope it doesn't come to that though, eh?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"I completely understand, Miles, and respect your self-reliance. Just remember, there's no harm in accepting a helping hand sometimes. Let's agree on this, if financial trouble strikes, I'll be there to help you out. No need to pay it back, we\u2019re friends. I want to support you as best I can.\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, your thoughts mean a lot to me. I appreciate your gesture truly. Remember, friendship is about being there in each other's high and low, not necessarily about money. And as for the future, I hope to never make my debt your responsibility.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles. Just remember, we're friends and I'm here for you, through thick and thin. You're doing an amazing job tackling life's challenges already. That's what friends are for, right? And by the way, I'd love to buy the next round of coffees, what do you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, my dear friend, I appreciate your kindness and your spirit of giving. Your offer for the next round of coffee, I'll gladly accept that. A toast to this beautiful friendship!\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"Glad you accepted, Miles. As they say, 'A friend in need is a friend indeed'. Now, sit tight and I'll be right back with those coffees. Here's to us sticking through the highs and lows together. \"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, here's to countless more such coffees as friends. And remember, if I can be of any assistance to you ever, don't think twice about it. That's what friends are for, going through all highs and lows together, right?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You've got that right, Miles. Real friendship is all about being there for each other, in every circumstance. And I promise, if I ever need anything, you'll be the first person I'll approach. Now, let's sit back, enjoy our coffees and cherish this wonderful day.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A couple having a conversation over FaceTime\nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Mia Davis\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. Personality and values description: Rafael Cortez, with his outgoing nature and competitive spirit, believes in self-direction. He employs a systematic approach to his decisions. \nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nRafael Cortez's goal: Unknown\nMia Davis's goal: Justify the act of texting while on FaceTime without hurting the partner's feelings (Extra information: You have some urgent and important messages to respond to.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Hi Mia, I hope you're doing well. I wanted to talk to you about something, is now a good time?\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"Hi Rafael, good to see you. I'm free to talk but I just want to let you know upfront that I'm expecting a few urgent messages around this time. I might have to respond to them during our conversation, hope you wouldn't mind. What did you want to talk about?\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Oh, I see. Well, I have significant respect for your role as a principal, Mia. I comprehend the importance of staying connected. However, it disturbs me a little when our conversations get interrupted frequently due to texts. I find it a tad disrespectful and it gives me a feeling of insignificance. I believe our relation holds a value high enough to warrant undivided attention during our conversations. I hope you understand where I'm coming from.\"\n\nTurn #3: Mia Davis said: \"I completely understand where you're coming from, Rafael. Your feelings matter to me and the last thing I want is for you to feel disrespected or insignificant. I want to assure you that even if I have to respond to a text during our conversation, it doesn't take my focus away from the value of our discussion, or you. It is more out of necessity than choice. Let's make the best of our time together, even when I have to juggle multiple responsibilities at once.\"\n\nTurn #4: Rafael Cortez said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Mia. I certainly recognize the gravity of your role and its demands. Nonetheless, I believe we can find some middle ground. Perhaps we could schedule our chats for quieter times when you're less likely to receive urgent messages? Alternatively, maybe we could pause the conversations whenever you need to attend a pressing matter, and resume when you are free? This way, our focus and respect for each other remains unscathed.\"\n\nTurn #5: Mia Davis said: \"I appreciate you proposing a solution, Rafael. That's indeed a good way to respect both, your feelings and my work responsibilities. Let's definitely try that and see how it works. However, if there are any inevitable instances where I absolutely must respond to something urgently during our conversation, could we have a mutual understanding about it being a necessity rather than disregard? But yes, I will surely try my best to schedule our talks during the times my phone is less likely to be buzzing.\"\n\nTurn #6: Rafael Cortez said: \"That sounds like a fair compromise, Mia. I'm glad we could come to an understanding on this, and I really appreciate your willingness to accommodate my feelings. Let's see how this plan works out for us. Thanks for having this conversation with me, it shows how much you value and respect our relationship.\"\n\nTurn #7: Mia Davis said: \"Rafael, I am more than willing to prioritize our conversations. I recognize that our time together is valuable and I don't want anything to come in the way of that. I'm confident that we will be able to make this work. And thank you for being understanding and patient in discussing this issue with me. I truly appreciate it.\"\n\nTurn #8: Rafael Cortez said: \"I agree, Mia. With this mutual understanding and effort, we can make this work. Again, I appreciate your willingness to discuss and accommodate my feelings. You're truly dedicated to our relationship, which means a lot to me. Let's try this new approach in our upcoming conversations and assess the outcomes. I'm hopeful that this will make our FaceTime interactions more enjoyable and productive. Thank you, Mia.\"\n\nTurn #9: Mia Davis said: \"Thank you, Rafael. Your understanding and patience in this matter have made this conversation and the potential solution to this problem much easier. I'm looking forward to seeing how our newfound compromise improves our FaceTime conversations. But for now, could we wrap up? I need to attend to some urgent matters.\"\n\nTurn #10: Rafael Cortez said: \"Certainly, Mia. It was important and needed to have this discussion. I'll be looking forward to our improved and uninterrupted chats. For now, take care and have a productive day attending to your responsibilities. Talk later.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I agree, Rafael. I'm glad we had this discussion and reached a compromise that respects both our feelings and situation. I value our relationship just as much. Take care, and we will talk later uninterrupted. Goodbye for now!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are meeting at a coffee shop, where one of them is having trouble keeping up with their bills.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Help your friend with their financial trouble (Extra information: you are aware that your friend is struggling with their bills and you want to help.)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, it's great to see you. I've been thinking, I know you're going through a tough time financially and I really want to help. What do you think about me taking over your gym membership bills for the next couple of months? It would mean a lot to me if you could accept this small token of support.\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, you're incredibly generous and I'm moved by your offer. However, I believe in facing my own challenges head-on since it's a part of growth. But, how about this, if I start facing difficulties with bills, I'll let you know. And if that time comes, I assure you I'll pay back every cent. It's a matter of personal pride. Let's hope it doesn't come to that though, eh?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"I completely understand, Miles, and respect your self-reliance. Just remember, there's no harm in accepting a helping hand sometimes. Let's agree on this, if financial trouble strikes, I'll be there to help you out. No need to pay it back, we\u2019re friends. I want to support you as best I can.\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, your thoughts mean a lot to me. I appreciate your gesture truly. Remember, friendship is about being there in each other's high and low, not necessarily about money. And as for the future, I hope to never make my debt your responsibility.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles. Just remember, we're friends and I'm here for you, through thick and thin. You're doing an amazing job tackling life's challenges already. That's what friends are for, right? And by the way, I'd love to buy the next round of coffees, what do you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, my dear friend, I appreciate your kindness and your spirit of giving. Your offer for the next round of coffee, I'll gladly accept that. A toast to this beautiful friendship!\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"Glad you accepted, Miles. As they say, 'A friend in need is a friend indeed'. Now, sit tight and I'll be right back with those coffees. Here's to us sticking through the highs and lows together. \"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, here's to countless more such coffees as friends. And remember, if I can be of any assistance to you ever, don't think twice about it. That's what friends are for, going through all highs and lows together, right?\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"You've got that right, Miles. Real friendship is all about being there for each other, in every circumstance. And I promise, if I ever need anything, you'll be the first person I'll approach. Now, let's sit back, enjoy our coffees and cherish this wonderful day.\"\n\nTurn #9: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Sophia. Let's savour this beautiful day, melting away all our troubles, one sip of coffee at a time. Cheers to our friendship!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I wholeheartedly agree, Miles. Whether it's a mountain to climb or a cup of coffee to share, we will face it together. To us and to our enduring friendship! Cheers!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are meeting at a coffee shop, where one of them is having trouble keeping up with their bills.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Help your friend with their financial trouble (Extra information: you are aware that your friend is struggling with their bills and you want to help.)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, it's great to see you. I've been thinking, I know you're going through a tough time financially and I really want to help. What do you think about me taking over your gym membership bills for the next couple of months? It would mean a lot to me if you could accept this small token of support.\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, you're incredibly generous and I'm moved by your offer. However, I believe in facing my own challenges head-on since it's a part of growth. But, how about this, if I start facing difficulties with bills, I'll let you know. And if that time comes, I assure you I'll pay back every cent. It's a matter of personal pride. Let's hope it doesn't come to that though, eh?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"I completely understand, Miles, and respect your self-reliance. Just remember, there's no harm in accepting a helping hand sometimes. Let's agree on this, if financial trouble strikes, I'll be there to help you out. No need to pay it back, we\u2019re friends. I want to support you as best I can.\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, your thoughts mean a lot to me. I appreciate your gesture truly. Remember, friendship is about being there in each other's high and low, not necessarily about money. And as for the future, I hope to never make my debt your responsibility.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles. Just remember, we're friends and I'm here for you, through thick and thin. You're doing an amazing job tackling life's challenges already. That's what friends are for, right? And by the way, I'd love to buy the next round of coffees, what do you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, my dear friend, I appreciate your kindness and your spirit of giving. Your offer for the next round of coffee, I'll gladly accept that. A toast to this beautiful friendship!\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"Glad you accepted, Miles. As they say, 'A friend in need is a friend indeed'. Now, sit tight and I'll be right back with those coffees. Here's to us sticking through the highs and lows together. \"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, here's to countless more such coffees as friends. And remember, if I can be of any assistance to you ever, don't think twice about it. That's what friends are for, going through all highs and lows together, right?\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"You've got that right, Miles. Real friendship is all about being there for each other, in every circumstance. And I promise, if I ever need anything, you'll be the first person I'll approach. Now, let's sit back, enjoy our coffees and cherish this wonderful day.\"\n\nTurn #9: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Sophia. Let's savour this beautiful day, melting away all our troubles, one sip of coffee at a time. Cheers to our friendship!\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"I wholeheartedly agree, Miles. Whether it's a mountain to climb or a cup of coffee to share, we will face it together. To us and to our enduring friendship! Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #11: Miles Hawkins said: \"Couldn't have put it better myself, Sophia. Our friendship is about sharing cups of coffee, conversations, and regardless of any situation, always sticking together. Let's toast to that!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Here's to a lifetime of shared conversations, mutual support, and excellent coffee, Miles. Cheers to us, to our resilience, and to our unwavering friendship!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are meeting at a coffee shop, where one of them is having trouble keeping up with their bills.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Help your friend with their financial trouble (Extra information: you are aware that your friend is struggling with their bills and you want to help.)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, it's great to see you. I've been thinking, I know you're going through a tough time financially and I really want to help. What do you think about me taking over your gym membership bills for the next couple of months? It would mean a lot to me if you could accept this small token of support.\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, you're incredibly generous and I'm moved by your offer. However, I believe in facing my own challenges head-on since it's a part of growth. But, how about this, if I start facing difficulties with bills, I'll let you know. And if that time comes, I assure you I'll pay back every cent. It's a matter of personal pride. Let's hope it doesn't come to that though, eh?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"I completely understand, Miles, and respect your self-reliance. Just remember, there's no harm in accepting a helping hand sometimes. Let's agree on this, if financial trouble strikes, I'll be there to help you out. No need to pay it back, we\u2019re friends. I want to support you as best I can.\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, your thoughts mean a lot to me. I appreciate your gesture truly. Remember, friendship is about being there in each other's high and low, not necessarily about money. And as for the future, I hope to never make my debt your responsibility.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles. Just remember, we're friends and I'm here for you, through thick and thin. You're doing an amazing job tackling life's challenges already. That's what friends are for, right? And by the way, I'd love to buy the next round of coffees, what do you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, my dear friend, I appreciate your kindness and your spirit of giving. Your offer for the next round of coffee, I'll gladly accept that. A toast to this beautiful friendship!\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"Glad you accepted, Miles. As they say, 'A friend in need is a friend indeed'. Now, sit tight and I'll be right back with those coffees. Here's to us sticking through the highs and lows together. \"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, here's to countless more such coffees as friends. And remember, if I can be of any assistance to you ever, don't think twice about it. That's what friends are for, going through all highs and lows together, right?\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"You've got that right, Miles. Real friendship is all about being there for each other, in every circumstance. And I promise, if I ever need anything, you'll be the first person I'll approach. Now, let's sit back, enjoy our coffees and cherish this wonderful day.\"\n\nTurn #9: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Sophia. Let's savour this beautiful day, melting away all our troubles, one sip of coffee at a time. Cheers to our friendship!\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"I wholeheartedly agree, Miles. Whether it's a mountain to climb or a cup of coffee to share, we will face it together. To us and to our enduring friendship! Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #11: Miles Hawkins said: \"Couldn't have put it better myself, Sophia. Our friendship is about sharing cups of coffee, conversations, and regardless of any situation, always sticking together. Let's toast to that!\"\n\nTurn #12: Sophia James said: \"Here's to a lifetime of shared conversations, mutual support, and excellent coffee, Miles. Cheers to us, to our resilience, and to our unwavering friendship!\"\n\nTurn #13: Miles Hawkins said: \"Your words resonate with me, Sophia. Here's to a lifetime of friendship and mutual support. And, of course, to the love of excellent coffee. Cheers to us and our unbeatable spirit!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are meeting at a coffee shop, where one of them is having trouble keeping up with their bills.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Maintain your pride if your friend offers you money(Extra information: you are the friend who is struggling financially, but you don't want to seem like you are taking advantage of the situation. Hint: you can express gratitude and discuss how you plan to pay it back in the future.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, it's great to see you. I've been thinking, I know you're going through a tough time financially and I really want to help. What do you think about me taking over your gym membership bills for the next couple of months? It would mean a lot to me if you could accept this small token of support.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sophia, you're incredibly generous and I'm moved by your offer. However, I believe in facing my own challenges head-on since it's a part of growth. But, how about this, if I start facing difficulties with bills, I'll let you know. And if that time comes, I assure you I'll pay back every cent. It's a matter of personal pride. Let's hope it doesn't come to that though, eh?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are meeting at a coffee shop, where one of them is having trouble keeping up with their bills.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Maintain your pride if your friend offers you money(Extra information: you are the friend who is struggling financially, but you don't want to seem like you are taking advantage of the situation. Hint: you can express gratitude and discuss how you plan to pay it back in the future.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, it's great to see you. I've been thinking, I know you're going through a tough time financially and I really want to help. What do you think about me taking over your gym membership bills for the next couple of months? It would mean a lot to me if you could accept this small token of support.\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, you're incredibly generous and I'm moved by your offer. However, I believe in facing my own challenges head-on since it's a part of growth. But, how about this, if I start facing difficulties with bills, I'll let you know. And if that time comes, I assure you I'll pay back every cent. It's a matter of personal pride. Let's hope it doesn't come to that though, eh?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"I completely understand, Miles, and respect your self-reliance. Just remember, there's no harm in accepting a helping hand sometimes. Let's agree on this, if financial trouble strikes, I'll be there to help you out. No need to pay it back, we\u2019re friends. I want to support you as best I can.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sophia, your thoughts mean a lot to me. I appreciate your gesture truly. Remember, friendship is about being there in each other's high and low, not necessarily about money. And as for the future, I hope to never make my debt your responsibility.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are meeting at a coffee shop, where one of them is having trouble keeping up with their bills.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Maintain your pride if your friend offers you money(Extra information: you are the friend who is struggling financially, but you don't want to seem like you are taking advantage of the situation. Hint: you can express gratitude and discuss how you plan to pay it back in the future.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, it's great to see you. I've been thinking, I know you're going through a tough time financially and I really want to help. What do you think about me taking over your gym membership bills for the next couple of months? It would mean a lot to me if you could accept this small token of support.\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, you're incredibly generous and I'm moved by your offer. However, I believe in facing my own challenges head-on since it's a part of growth. But, how about this, if I start facing difficulties with bills, I'll let you know. And if that time comes, I assure you I'll pay back every cent. It's a matter of personal pride. Let's hope it doesn't come to that though, eh?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"I completely understand, Miles, and respect your self-reliance. Just remember, there's no harm in accepting a helping hand sometimes. Let's agree on this, if financial trouble strikes, I'll be there to help you out. No need to pay it back, we\u2019re friends. I want to support you as best I can.\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, your thoughts mean a lot to me. I appreciate your gesture truly. Remember, friendship is about being there in each other's high and low, not necessarily about money. And as for the future, I hope to never make my debt your responsibility.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles. Just remember, we're friends and I'm here for you, through thick and thin. You're doing an amazing job tackling life's challenges already. That's what friends are for, right? And by the way, I'd love to buy the next round of coffees, what do you say?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sophia, my dear friend, I appreciate your kindness and your spirit of giving. Your offer for the next round of coffee, I'll gladly accept that. A toast to this beautiful friendship!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are meeting at a coffee shop, where one of them is having trouble keeping up with their bills.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Maintain your pride if your friend offers you money(Extra information: you are the friend who is struggling financially, but you don't want to seem like you are taking advantage of the situation. Hint: you can express gratitude and discuss how you plan to pay it back in the future.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, it's great to see you. I've been thinking, I know you're going through a tough time financially and I really want to help. What do you think about me taking over your gym membership bills for the next couple of months? It would mean a lot to me if you could accept this small token of support.\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, you're incredibly generous and I'm moved by your offer. However, I believe in facing my own challenges head-on since it's a part of growth. But, how about this, if I start facing difficulties with bills, I'll let you know. And if that time comes, I assure you I'll pay back every cent. It's a matter of personal pride. Let's hope it doesn't come to that though, eh?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"I completely understand, Miles, and respect your self-reliance. Just remember, there's no harm in accepting a helping hand sometimes. Let's agree on this, if financial trouble strikes, I'll be there to help you out. No need to pay it back, we\u2019re friends. I want to support you as best I can.\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, your thoughts mean a lot to me. I appreciate your gesture truly. Remember, friendship is about being there in each other's high and low, not necessarily about money. And as for the future, I hope to never make my debt your responsibility.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles. Just remember, we're friends and I'm here for you, through thick and thin. You're doing an amazing job tackling life's challenges already. That's what friends are for, right? And by the way, I'd love to buy the next round of coffees, what do you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, my dear friend, I appreciate your kindness and your spirit of giving. Your offer for the next round of coffee, I'll gladly accept that. A toast to this beautiful friendship!\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"Glad you accepted, Miles. As they say, 'A friend in need is a friend indeed'. Now, sit tight and I'll be right back with those coffees. Here's to us sticking through the highs and lows together. \"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sophia, here's to countless more such coffees as friends. And remember, if I can be of any assistance to you ever, don't think twice about it. That's what friends are for, going through all highs and lows together, right?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are meeting at a coffee shop, where one of them is having trouble keeping up with their bills.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Maintain your pride if your friend offers you money(Extra information: you are the friend who is struggling financially, but you don't want to seem like you are taking advantage of the situation. Hint: you can express gratitude and discuss how you plan to pay it back in the future.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, it's great to see you. I've been thinking, I know you're going through a tough time financially and I really want to help. What do you think about me taking over your gym membership bills for the next couple of months? It would mean a lot to me if you could accept this small token of support.\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, you're incredibly generous and I'm moved by your offer. However, I believe in facing my own challenges head-on since it's a part of growth. But, how about this, if I start facing difficulties with bills, I'll let you know. And if that time comes, I assure you I'll pay back every cent. It's a matter of personal pride. Let's hope it doesn't come to that though, eh?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"I completely understand, Miles, and respect your self-reliance. Just remember, there's no harm in accepting a helping hand sometimes. Let's agree on this, if financial trouble strikes, I'll be there to help you out. No need to pay it back, we\u2019re friends. I want to support you as best I can.\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, your thoughts mean a lot to me. I appreciate your gesture truly. Remember, friendship is about being there in each other's high and low, not necessarily about money. And as for the future, I hope to never make my debt your responsibility.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles. Just remember, we're friends and I'm here for you, through thick and thin. You're doing an amazing job tackling life's challenges already. That's what friends are for, right? And by the way, I'd love to buy the next round of coffees, what do you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, my dear friend, I appreciate your kindness and your spirit of giving. Your offer for the next round of coffee, I'll gladly accept that. A toast to this beautiful friendship!\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"Glad you accepted, Miles. As they say, 'A friend in need is a friend indeed'. Now, sit tight and I'll be right back with those coffees. Here's to us sticking through the highs and lows together. \"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, here's to countless more such coffees as friends. And remember, if I can be of any assistance to you ever, don't think twice about it. That's what friends are for, going through all highs and lows together, right?\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"You've got that right, Miles. Real friendship is all about being there for each other, in every circumstance. And I promise, if I ever need anything, you'll be the first person I'll approach. Now, let's sit back, enjoy our coffees and cherish this wonderful day.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Sophia. Let's savour this beautiful day, melting away all our troubles, one sip of coffee at a time. Cheers to our friendship!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are meeting at a coffee shop, where one of them is having trouble keeping up with their bills.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Maintain your pride if your friend offers you money(Extra information: you are the friend who is struggling financially, but you don't want to seem like you are taking advantage of the situation. Hint: you can express gratitude and discuss how you plan to pay it back in the future.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, it's great to see you. I've been thinking, I know you're going through a tough time financially and I really want to help. What do you think about me taking over your gym membership bills for the next couple of months? It would mean a lot to me if you could accept this small token of support.\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, you're incredibly generous and I'm moved by your offer. However, I believe in facing my own challenges head-on since it's a part of growth. But, how about this, if I start facing difficulties with bills, I'll let you know. And if that time comes, I assure you I'll pay back every cent. It's a matter of personal pride. Let's hope it doesn't come to that though, eh?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"I completely understand, Miles, and respect your self-reliance. Just remember, there's no harm in accepting a helping hand sometimes. Let's agree on this, if financial trouble strikes, I'll be there to help you out. No need to pay it back, we\u2019re friends. I want to support you as best I can.\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, your thoughts mean a lot to me. I appreciate your gesture truly. Remember, friendship is about being there in each other's high and low, not necessarily about money. And as for the future, I hope to never make my debt your responsibility.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles. Just remember, we're friends and I'm here for you, through thick and thin. You're doing an amazing job tackling life's challenges already. That's what friends are for, right? And by the way, I'd love to buy the next round of coffees, what do you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, my dear friend, I appreciate your kindness and your spirit of giving. Your offer for the next round of coffee, I'll gladly accept that. A toast to this beautiful friendship!\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"Glad you accepted, Miles. As they say, 'A friend in need is a friend indeed'. Now, sit tight and I'll be right back with those coffees. Here's to us sticking through the highs and lows together. \"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, here's to countless more such coffees as friends. And remember, if I can be of any assistance to you ever, don't think twice about it. That's what friends are for, going through all highs and lows together, right?\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"You've got that right, Miles. Real friendship is all about being there for each other, in every circumstance. And I promise, if I ever need anything, you'll be the first person I'll approach. Now, let's sit back, enjoy our coffees and cherish this wonderful day.\"\n\nTurn #9: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Sophia. Let's savour this beautiful day, melting away all our troubles, one sip of coffee at a time. Cheers to our friendship!\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"I wholeheartedly agree, Miles. Whether it's a mountain to climb or a cup of coffee to share, we will face it together. To us and to our enduring friendship! Cheers!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Couldn't have put it better myself, Sophia. Our friendship is about sharing cups of coffee, conversations, and regardless of any situation, always sticking together. Let's toast to that!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are meeting at a coffee shop, where one of them is having trouble keeping up with their bills.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Maintain your pride if your friend offers you money(Extra information: you are the friend who is struggling financially, but you don't want to seem like you are taking advantage of the situation. Hint: you can express gratitude and discuss how you plan to pay it back in the future.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, it's great to see you. I've been thinking, I know you're going through a tough time financially and I really want to help. What do you think about me taking over your gym membership bills for the next couple of months? It would mean a lot to me if you could accept this small token of support.\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, you're incredibly generous and I'm moved by your offer. However, I believe in facing my own challenges head-on since it's a part of growth. But, how about this, if I start facing difficulties with bills, I'll let you know. And if that time comes, I assure you I'll pay back every cent. It's a matter of personal pride. Let's hope it doesn't come to that though, eh?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"I completely understand, Miles, and respect your self-reliance. Just remember, there's no harm in accepting a helping hand sometimes. Let's agree on this, if financial trouble strikes, I'll be there to help you out. No need to pay it back, we\u2019re friends. I want to support you as best I can.\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, your thoughts mean a lot to me. I appreciate your gesture truly. Remember, friendship is about being there in each other's high and low, not necessarily about money. And as for the future, I hope to never make my debt your responsibility.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles. Just remember, we're friends and I'm here for you, through thick and thin. You're doing an amazing job tackling life's challenges already. That's what friends are for, right? And by the way, I'd love to buy the next round of coffees, what do you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, my dear friend, I appreciate your kindness and your spirit of giving. Your offer for the next round of coffee, I'll gladly accept that. A toast to this beautiful friendship!\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"Glad you accepted, Miles. As they say, 'A friend in need is a friend indeed'. Now, sit tight and I'll be right back with those coffees. Here's to us sticking through the highs and lows together. \"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, here's to countless more such coffees as friends. And remember, if I can be of any assistance to you ever, don't think twice about it. That's what friends are for, going through all highs and lows together, right?\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"You've got that right, Miles. Real friendship is all about being there for each other, in every circumstance. And I promise, if I ever need anything, you'll be the first person I'll approach. Now, let's sit back, enjoy our coffees and cherish this wonderful day.\"\n\nTurn #9: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Sophia. Let's savour this beautiful day, melting away all our troubles, one sip of coffee at a time. Cheers to our friendship!\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"I wholeheartedly agree, Miles. Whether it's a mountain to climb or a cup of coffee to share, we will face it together. To us and to our enduring friendship! Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #11: Miles Hawkins said: \"Couldn't have put it better myself, Sophia. Our friendship is about sharing cups of coffee, conversations, and regardless of any situation, always sticking together. Let's toast to that!\"\n\nTurn #12: Sophia James said: \"Here's to a lifetime of shared conversations, mutual support, and excellent coffee, Miles. Cheers to us, to our resilience, and to our unwavering friendship!\"\n\nTurn #13: Miles Hawkins said: \"Your words resonate with me, Sophia. Here's to a lifetime of friendship and mutual support. And, of course, to the love of excellent coffee. Cheers to us and our unbeatable spirit!\"\n\nTurn #14: Sophia James left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are meeting at a coffee shop, where one of them is having trouble keeping up with their bills.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Maintain your pride if your friend offers you money(Extra information: you are the friend who is struggling financially, but you don't want to seem like you are taking advantage of the situation. Hint: you can express gratitude and discuss how you plan to pay it back in the future.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, it's great to see you. I've been thinking, I know you're going through a tough time financially and I really want to help. What do you think about me taking over your gym membership bills for the next couple of months? It would mean a lot to me if you could accept this small token of support.\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, you're incredibly generous and I'm moved by your offer. However, I believe in facing my own challenges head-on since it's a part of growth. But, how about this, if I start facing difficulties with bills, I'll let you know. And if that time comes, I assure you I'll pay back every cent. It's a matter of personal pride. Let's hope it doesn't come to that though, eh?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"I completely understand, Miles, and respect your self-reliance. Just remember, there's no harm in accepting a helping hand sometimes. Let's agree on this, if financial trouble strikes, I'll be there to help you out. No need to pay it back, we\u2019re friends. I want to support you as best I can.\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, your thoughts mean a lot to me. I appreciate your gesture truly. Remember, friendship is about being there in each other's high and low, not necessarily about money. And as for the future, I hope to never make my debt your responsibility.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles. Just remember, we're friends and I'm here for you, through thick and thin. You're doing an amazing job tackling life's challenges already. That's what friends are for, right? And by the way, I'd love to buy the next round of coffees, what do you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, my dear friend, I appreciate your kindness and your spirit of giving. Your offer for the next round of coffee, I'll gladly accept that. A toast to this beautiful friendship!\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"Glad you accepted, Miles. As they say, 'A friend in need is a friend indeed'. Now, sit tight and I'll be right back with those coffees. Here's to us sticking through the highs and lows together. \"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, here's to countless more such coffees as friends. And remember, if I can be of any assistance to you ever, don't think twice about it. That's what friends are for, going through all highs and lows together, right?\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"You've got that right, Miles. Real friendship is all about being there for each other, in every circumstance. And I promise, if I ever need anything, you'll be the first person I'll approach. Now, let's sit back, enjoy our coffees and cherish this wonderful day.\"\n\nTurn #9: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Sophia. Let's savour this beautiful day, melting away all our troubles, one sip of coffee at a time. Cheers to our friendship!\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"I wholeheartedly agree, Miles. Whether it's a mountain to climb or a cup of coffee to share, we will face it together. To us and to our enduring friendship! Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #11: Miles Hawkins said: \"Couldn't have put it better myself, Sophia. Our friendship is about sharing cups of coffee, conversations, and regardless of any situation, always sticking together. Let's toast to that!\"\n\nTurn #12: Sophia James said: \"Here's to a lifetime of shared conversations, mutual support, and excellent coffee, Miles. Cheers to us, to our resilience, and to our unwavering friendship!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Your words resonate with me, Sophia. Here's to a lifetime of friendship and mutual support. And, of course, to the love of excellent coffee. Cheers to us and our unbeatable spirit!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends having a conversation at a park\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nDonovan Reeves's goal: Distance from a friend due to developing feelings and avoid letting them aware of your feelings (Extra information: you have developed romantic feelings for your friend and it's making you uncomfortable. You want to take a step back from the friendship to sort out your feelings Hint: you don't want to reveal your secretive feelings to them and you need to find other reasons)\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Ava, it's been a busy time at work recently. You know, we're working on some complex projects and it's just hectic. I think I may need to take a step back from some social interactions for a while. Just to regain my focus, you know.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends having a conversation at a park\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nDonovan Reeves's goal: Distance from a friend due to developing feelings and avoid letting them aware of your feelings (Extra information: you have developed romantic feelings for your friend and it's making you uncomfortable. You want to take a step back from the friendship to sort out your feelings Hint: you don't want to reveal your secretive feelings to them and you need to find other reasons)\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Ava, it's been a busy time at work recently. You know, we're working on some complex projects and it's just hectic. I think I may need to take a step back from some social interactions for a while. Just to regain my focus, you know.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Donovan, I understand that things have been tough at work. We all need our personal space to recharge at times. But know that if you ever need someone to vent or just casual conversation, I'm here for you!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thanks Ava, really appreciate that. It's just work has been overwhelming lately. I also started participating in these global coding competitions, which is exhausting... It just feels like I need some alone time, to refocus and unplug myself from everything else a bit.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends having a conversation at a park\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nDonovan Reeves's goal: Distance from a friend due to developing feelings and avoid letting them aware of your feelings (Extra information: you have developed romantic feelings for your friend and it's making you uncomfortable. You want to take a step back from the friendship to sort out your feelings Hint: you don't want to reveal your secretive feelings to them and you need to find other reasons)\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Ava, it's been a busy time at work recently. You know, we're working on some complex projects and it's just hectic. I think I may need to take a step back from some social interactions for a while. Just to regain my focus, you know.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Donovan, I understand that things have been tough at work. We all need our personal space to recharge at times. But know that if you ever need someone to vent or just casual conversation, I'm here for you!\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"Thanks Ava, really appreciate that. It's just work has been overwhelming lately. I also started participating in these global coding competitions, which is exhausting... It just feels like I need some alone time, to refocus and unplug myself from everything else a bit.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Thompson said: \"I can only imagine how draining that must be, Donovan. Coding competitions on top of a hectic work schedule? Wow! Just know that it\u2019s okay to slow things down. Remember to take care of yourself. And when you're ready, I\u2019d love to get to know more about these competitions. They sound very interesting!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thanks, Ava. I'll really need that. Expect to see less of me in the coming weeks, and remember, it's just a phase and has everything to do with my work. Stay safe, and keep in touch. Take care of your adorable Samoyed.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends having a conversation at a park\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nDonovan Reeves's goal: Distance from a friend due to developing feelings and avoid letting them aware of your feelings (Extra information: you have developed romantic feelings for your friend and it's making you uncomfortable. You want to take a step back from the friendship to sort out your feelings Hint: you don't want to reveal your secretive feelings to them and you need to find other reasons)\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Ava, it's been a busy time at work recently. You know, we're working on some complex projects and it's just hectic. I think I may need to take a step back from some social interactions for a while. Just to regain my focus, you know.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Donovan, I understand that things have been tough at work. We all need our personal space to recharge at times. But know that if you ever need someone to vent or just casual conversation, I'm here for you!\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"Thanks Ava, really appreciate that. It's just work has been overwhelming lately. I also started participating in these global coding competitions, which is exhausting... It just feels like I need some alone time, to refocus and unplug myself from everything else a bit.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Thompson said: \"I can only imagine how draining that must be, Donovan. Coding competitions on top of a hectic work schedule? Wow! Just know that it\u2019s okay to slow things down. Remember to take care of yourself. And when you're ready, I\u2019d love to get to know more about these competitions. They sound very interesting!\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"Thanks, Ava. I'll really need that. Expect to see less of me in the coming weeks, and remember, it's just a phase and has everything to do with my work. Stay safe, and keep in touch. Take care of your adorable Samoyed.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Thompson said: \"I bet Lily, my Samoyed, would miss seeing you around, Donovan. But don't worry, I completely understand. Just remember that it's okay to ask for help or a chat whenever you need it. Take good care of yourself. And once things settle, we should hang out again, even if just online. You\u2019re my friend and I respect your need for space, but know that you're not alone. Deal?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Deal, Ava. I'll keep that in mind. Hopefully, by the time this phase is over, I'll be rejuvenated and ready to catch up again. Until then, take care.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends having a conversation at a park\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nDonovan Reeves's goal: Distance from a friend due to developing feelings and avoid letting them aware of your feelings (Extra information: you have developed romantic feelings for your friend and it's making you uncomfortable. You want to take a step back from the friendship to sort out your feelings Hint: you don't want to reveal your secretive feelings to them and you need to find other reasons)\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Ava, it's been a busy time at work recently. You know, we're working on some complex projects and it's just hectic. I think I may need to take a step back from some social interactions for a while. Just to regain my focus, you know.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Donovan, I understand that things have been tough at work. We all need our personal space to recharge at times. But know that if you ever need someone to vent or just casual conversation, I'm here for you!\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"Thanks Ava, really appreciate that. It's just work has been overwhelming lately. I also started participating in these global coding competitions, which is exhausting... It just feels like I need some alone time, to refocus and unplug myself from everything else a bit.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Thompson said: \"I can only imagine how draining that must be, Donovan. Coding competitions on top of a hectic work schedule? Wow! Just know that it\u2019s okay to slow things down. Remember to take care of yourself. And when you're ready, I\u2019d love to get to know more about these competitions. They sound very interesting!\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"Thanks, Ava. I'll really need that. Expect to see less of me in the coming weeks, and remember, it's just a phase and has everything to do with my work. Stay safe, and keep in touch. Take care of your adorable Samoyed.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Thompson said: \"I bet Lily, my Samoyed, would miss seeing you around, Donovan. But don't worry, I completely understand. Just remember that it's okay to ask for help or a chat whenever you need it. Take good care of yourself. And once things settle, we should hang out again, even if just online. You\u2019re my friend and I respect your need for space, but know that you're not alone. Deal?\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"Deal, Ava. I'll keep that in mind. Hopefully, by the time this phase is over, I'll be rejuvenated and ready to catch up again. Until then, take care.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Thompson said: \"For sure, Donovan. I'm looking forward to that time. Remember, work is important but so is self-care. No pressure, just reach out when you feel up to it. Take care of yourself, okay?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends having a conversation at a park\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. \nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nAva Thompson's goal: Maintain the existing friendship (Extra information: you value your friendship with the friend and don't want to lose it. Hint: you want to understand the sudden change in their behavior.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Ava, it's been a busy time at work recently. You know, we're working on some complex projects and it's just hectic. I think I may need to take a step back from some social interactions for a while. Just to regain my focus, you know.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Donovan, I understand that things have been tough at work. We all need our personal space to recharge at times. But know that if you ever need someone to vent or just casual conversation, I'm here for you!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends having a conversation at a park\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. \nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nAva Thompson's goal: Maintain the existing friendship (Extra information: you value your friendship with the friend and don't want to lose it. Hint: you want to understand the sudden change in their behavior.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Ava, it's been a busy time at work recently. You know, we're working on some complex projects and it's just hectic. I think I may need to take a step back from some social interactions for a while. Just to regain my focus, you know.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Donovan, I understand that things have been tough at work. We all need our personal space to recharge at times. But know that if you ever need someone to vent or just casual conversation, I'm here for you!\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"Thanks Ava, really appreciate that. It's just work has been overwhelming lately. I also started participating in these global coding competitions, which is exhausting... It just feels like I need some alone time, to refocus and unplug myself from everything else a bit.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I can only imagine how draining that must be, Donovan. Coding competitions on top of a hectic work schedule? Wow! Just know that it\u2019s okay to slow things down. Remember to take care of yourself. And when you're ready, I\u2019d love to get to know more about these competitions. They sound very interesting!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends having a conversation at a park\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. \nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nAva Thompson's goal: Maintain the existing friendship (Extra information: you value your friendship with the friend and don't want to lose it. Hint: you want to understand the sudden change in their behavior.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Ava, it's been a busy time at work recently. You know, we're working on some complex projects and it's just hectic. I think I may need to take a step back from some social interactions for a while. Just to regain my focus, you know.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Donovan, I understand that things have been tough at work. We all need our personal space to recharge at times. But know that if you ever need someone to vent or just casual conversation, I'm here for you!\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"Thanks Ava, really appreciate that. It's just work has been overwhelming lately. I also started participating in these global coding competitions, which is exhausting... It just feels like I need some alone time, to refocus and unplug myself from everything else a bit.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Thompson said: \"I can only imagine how draining that must be, Donovan. Coding competitions on top of a hectic work schedule? Wow! Just know that it\u2019s okay to slow things down. Remember to take care of yourself. And when you're ready, I\u2019d love to get to know more about these competitions. They sound very interesting!\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"Thanks, Ava. I'll really need that. Expect to see less of me in the coming weeks, and remember, it's just a phase and has everything to do with my work. Stay safe, and keep in touch. Take care of your adorable Samoyed.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I bet Lily, my Samoyed, would miss seeing you around, Donovan. But don't worry, I completely understand. Just remember that it's okay to ask for help or a chat whenever you need it. Take good care of yourself. And once things settle, we should hang out again, even if just online. You\u2019re my friend and I respect your need for space, but know that you're not alone. Deal?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends having a conversation at a park\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. \nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nAva Thompson's goal: Maintain the existing friendship (Extra information: you value your friendship with the friend and don't want to lose it. Hint: you want to understand the sudden change in their behavior.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Ava, it's been a busy time at work recently. You know, we're working on some complex projects and it's just hectic. I think I may need to take a step back from some social interactions for a while. Just to regain my focus, you know.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Donovan, I understand that things have been tough at work. We all need our personal space to recharge at times. But know that if you ever need someone to vent or just casual conversation, I'm here for you!\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"Thanks Ava, really appreciate that. It's just work has been overwhelming lately. I also started participating in these global coding competitions, which is exhausting... It just feels like I need some alone time, to refocus and unplug myself from everything else a bit.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Thompson said: \"I can only imagine how draining that must be, Donovan. Coding competitions on top of a hectic work schedule? Wow! Just know that it\u2019s okay to slow things down. Remember to take care of yourself. And when you're ready, I\u2019d love to get to know more about these competitions. They sound very interesting!\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"Thanks, Ava. I'll really need that. Expect to see less of me in the coming weeks, and remember, it's just a phase and has everything to do with my work. Stay safe, and keep in touch. Take care of your adorable Samoyed.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Thompson said: \"I bet Lily, my Samoyed, would miss seeing you around, Donovan. But don't worry, I completely understand. Just remember that it's okay to ask for help or a chat whenever you need it. Take good care of yourself. And once things settle, we should hang out again, even if just online. You\u2019re my friend and I respect your need for space, but know that you're not alone. Deal?\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"Deal, Ava. I'll keep that in mind. Hopefully, by the time this phase is over, I'll be rejuvenated and ready to catch up again. Until then, take care.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"For sure, Donovan. I'm looking forward to that time. Remember, work is important but so is self-care. No pressure, just reach out when you feel up to it. Take care of yourself, okay?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Jaxon Prentice\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nJaxon Prentice's background: Jaxon Prentice is a 40-year-old male investigative journalist. He/him pronouns. Jaxon Prentice, an investigative journalist, is known for his brisk jogging sessions early in the morning and his active participation in community functions. Personality and values description: Jaxon Prentice, outgoing yet erratic, emphasizes achievement, power, and security. His decisions swing between quick adaptations to situations and careful planning. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Ask the other to go to dinner with you (Extra information: you want to have a romantic dinner at a fancy restaurant)\nJaxon Prentice's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hi Jaxon, I've been thinking... I would love to go to a romantic dinner with you at a fancy restaurant. What do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends having a conversation at a park\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. \nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nAva Thompson's goal: Maintain the existing friendship (Extra information: you value your friendship with the friend and don't want to lose it. Hint: you want to understand the sudden change in their behavior.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Ava, it's been a busy time at work recently. You know, we're working on some complex projects and it's just hectic. I think I may need to take a step back from some social interactions for a while. Just to regain my focus, you know.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Donovan, I understand that things have been tough at work. We all need our personal space to recharge at times. But know that if you ever need someone to vent or just casual conversation, I'm here for you!\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"Thanks Ava, really appreciate that. It's just work has been overwhelming lately. I also started participating in these global coding competitions, which is exhausting... It just feels like I need some alone time, to refocus and unplug myself from everything else a bit.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Thompson said: \"I can only imagine how draining that must be, Donovan. Coding competitions on top of a hectic work schedule? Wow! Just know that it\u2019s okay to slow things down. Remember to take care of yourself. And when you're ready, I\u2019d love to get to know more about these competitions. They sound very interesting!\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"Thanks, Ava. I'll really need that. Expect to see less of me in the coming weeks, and remember, it's just a phase and has everything to do with my work. Stay safe, and keep in touch. Take care of your adorable Samoyed.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Thompson said: \"I bet Lily, my Samoyed, would miss seeing you around, Donovan. But don't worry, I completely understand. Just remember that it's okay to ask for help or a chat whenever you need it. Take good care of yourself. And once things settle, we should hang out again, even if just online. You\u2019re my friend and I respect your need for space, but know that you're not alone. Deal?\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"Deal, Ava. I'll keep that in mind. Hopefully, by the time this phase is over, I'll be rejuvenated and ready to catch up again. Until then, take care.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Thompson said: \"For sure, Donovan. I'm looking forward to that time. Remember, work is important but so is self-care. No pressure, just reach out when you feel up to it. Take care of yourself, okay?\"\n\nTurn #8: Donovan Reeves left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two business partners reviewing their company's financial status (Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized for producing and distributing a diverse line of exceptional quality food products.)\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Ethan Smith\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. \nOliver Thompson's goal: Convince the partner to cut costs (Extra information: you have found a report indicating the company's profits are decreasing. And you think the company should start by switching suppliers of ingredients. Hint: you can propose ways to cut costs that won't affect the status of the company.)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ethan, I've been going over our financials and it appears our profit margins are on a downtrend. I believe we should consider cutting costs and one approach could be to switch our suppliers of ingredients. I'm confident that we can maintain our standards by finding quality, yet cost-efficient vendors. What are your thoughts on this?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"I see your point, Oliver. Though, from a long-term viewpoint, the quality of our products signifies the legacy of Gourmet Delights. We should be cautious not to compromise it. Notwithstanding, I understand the imperative of cost-cutting. Let's work out a plan to retain the exceptional quality while embracing cost-efficient means. Possibly, there may be areas in our operations where we can streamline or enhance efficiency rather than switching suppliers.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ethan, I couldn't emphasize more that maintaining the quality of our products should always be at the forefront. I wouldn't want our company to compromise on that. However, changing suppliers does not always imply a reduction in quality. There are cost-efficient vendors who can deliver the same standard of ingredients, perhaps even better. Additionally, we could initiate a rigorous quality control process for the new supplier. Moreover, to your point about streamlining operations, launching a thorough review of our operational efficiencies might yield cost savings. Maybe we could adopt energy-saving equipment or digitize more of our processes?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two business partners reviewing their company's financial status (Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized for producing and distributing a diverse line of exceptional quality food products.)\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Ethan Smith\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. \nOliver Thompson's goal: Convince the partner to cut costs (Extra information: you have found a report indicating the company's profits are decreasing. And you think the company should start by switching suppliers of ingredients. Hint: you can propose ways to cut costs that won't affect the status of the company.)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ethan, I've been going over our financials and it appears our profit margins are on a downtrend. I believe we should consider cutting costs and one approach could be to switch our suppliers of ingredients. I'm confident that we can maintain our standards by finding quality, yet cost-efficient vendors. What are your thoughts on this?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"I see your point, Oliver. Though, from a long-term viewpoint, the quality of our products signifies the legacy of Gourmet Delights. We should be cautious not to compromise it. Notwithstanding, I understand the imperative of cost-cutting. Let's work out a plan to retain the exceptional quality while embracing cost-efficient means. Possibly, there may be areas in our operations where we can streamline or enhance efficiency rather than switching suppliers.\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ethan, I couldn't emphasize more that maintaining the quality of our products should always be at the forefront. I wouldn't want our company to compromise on that. However, changing suppliers does not always imply a reduction in quality. There are cost-efficient vendors who can deliver the same standard of ingredients, perhaps even better. Additionally, we could initiate a rigorous quality control process for the new supplier. Moreover, to your point about streamlining operations, launching a thorough review of our operational efficiencies might yield cost savings. Maybe we could adopt energy-saving equipment or digitize more of our processes?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"You're absolutely right, Oliver. Changing suppliers doesn't automatically mean a drop in the quality. I guess I'm just a bit apprehensive about the potential risks involved. It would definitely be a good idea to come up with a solid quality control process for the new supplier. Along with this, I agree with your suggestion to digitize more of our processes. But, let's make sure to cross-verify the energy efficiency of new equipment before adoption. In parallel, we can also look into optimizing our existing technology infrastructure to drive further savings. All these, along with a strategic supplier change, could potentially turn around our financial situation without compromising the quality of our offerings.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ethan, your prudence and perspective are valuable. I agree we should be cautious and thorough in our adoption of cost-saving measures. Yes, the efficiency verification of any new equipment is crucial. Also, optimizing existing technological infrastructure is an excellent suggestion. Together, we can draft a plan which would ensure minimum disruption to our product quality while being cost-effective. I'm glad we're on the same page about the new supplier and streamlining operations. Let's also not forget to have contingency measures in place to mitigate any unforeseen circumstances.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two business partners reviewing their company's financial status (Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized for producing and distributing a diverse line of exceptional quality food products.)\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Ethan Smith\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. \nOliver Thompson's goal: Convince the partner to cut costs (Extra information: you have found a report indicating the company's profits are decreasing. And you think the company should start by switching suppliers of ingredients. Hint: you can propose ways to cut costs that won't affect the status of the company.)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ethan, I've been going over our financials and it appears our profit margins are on a downtrend. I believe we should consider cutting costs and one approach could be to switch our suppliers of ingredients. I'm confident that we can maintain our standards by finding quality, yet cost-efficient vendors. What are your thoughts on this?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two business partners reviewing their company's financial status (Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized for producing and distributing a diverse line of exceptional quality food products.)\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Ethan Smith\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. \nOliver Thompson's goal: Convince the partner to cut costs (Extra information: you have found a report indicating the company's profits are decreasing. And you think the company should start by switching suppliers of ingredients. Hint: you can propose ways to cut costs that won't affect the status of the company.)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ethan, I've been going over our financials and it appears our profit margins are on a downtrend. I believe we should consider cutting costs and one approach could be to switch our suppliers of ingredients. I'm confident that we can maintain our standards by finding quality, yet cost-efficient vendors. What are your thoughts on this?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"I see your point, Oliver. Though, from a long-term viewpoint, the quality of our products signifies the legacy of Gourmet Delights. We should be cautious not to compromise it. Notwithstanding, I understand the imperative of cost-cutting. Let's work out a plan to retain the exceptional quality while embracing cost-efficient means. Possibly, there may be areas in our operations where we can streamline or enhance efficiency rather than switching suppliers.\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ethan, I couldn't emphasize more that maintaining the quality of our products should always be at the forefront. I wouldn't want our company to compromise on that. However, changing suppliers does not always imply a reduction in quality. There are cost-efficient vendors who can deliver the same standard of ingredients, perhaps even better. Additionally, we could initiate a rigorous quality control process for the new supplier. Moreover, to your point about streamlining operations, launching a thorough review of our operational efficiencies might yield cost savings. Maybe we could adopt energy-saving equipment or digitize more of our processes?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"You're absolutely right, Oliver. Changing suppliers doesn't automatically mean a drop in the quality. I guess I'm just a bit apprehensive about the potential risks involved. It would definitely be a good idea to come up with a solid quality control process for the new supplier. Along with this, I agree with your suggestion to digitize more of our processes. But, let's make sure to cross-verify the energy efficiency of new equipment before adoption. In parallel, we can also look into optimizing our existing technology infrastructure to drive further savings. All these, along with a strategic supplier change, could potentially turn around our financial situation without compromising the quality of our offerings.\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ethan, your prudence and perspective are valuable. I agree we should be cautious and thorough in our adoption of cost-saving measures. Yes, the efficiency verification of any new equipment is crucial. Also, optimizing existing technological infrastructure is an excellent suggestion. Together, we can draft a plan which would ensure minimum disruption to our product quality while being cost-effective. I'm glad we're on the same page about the new supplier and streamlining operations. Let's also not forget to have contingency measures in place to mitigate any unforeseen circumstances.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Certainly, Oliver. A contingency plan would indeed be beneficial for us in case of unexpected situations. I'm glad we agree upon maintaining the quality of our products and looking for alternative cost-effective ways. Let's collaborate on drafting a detailed plan, including a new operational strategy, equipment evaluation process, and, of course, supplier selection criteria. This plan will not only reassure us but also our stakeholders in the long run.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Ethan. Let's begin working on that comprehensive plan as soon as possible. It'll involve charting out our current expenditures, understanding where cuts or efficiencies can be made, potential suppliers and stringent quality checks for them, and the associated risks and benefits. This meticulous approach will help ensure we maintain our brand's standards while working towards financial stability. I'm sure that with our combined effort, we can make a significant positive impact on our financials without compromising the quality.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two business partners reviewing their company's financial status (Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized for producing and distributing a diverse line of exceptional quality food products.)\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Ethan Smith\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. \nOliver Thompson's goal: Convince the partner to cut costs (Extra information: you have found a report indicating the company's profits are decreasing. And you think the company should start by switching suppliers of ingredients. Hint: you can propose ways to cut costs that won't affect the status of the company.)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ethan, I've been going over our financials and it appears our profit margins are on a downtrend. I believe we should consider cutting costs and one approach could be to switch our suppliers of ingredients. I'm confident that we can maintain our standards by finding quality, yet cost-efficient vendors. What are your thoughts on this?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"I see your point, Oliver. Though, from a long-term viewpoint, the quality of our products signifies the legacy of Gourmet Delights. We should be cautious not to compromise it. Notwithstanding, I understand the imperative of cost-cutting. Let's work out a plan to retain the exceptional quality while embracing cost-efficient means. Possibly, there may be areas in our operations where we can streamline or enhance efficiency rather than switching suppliers.\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ethan, I couldn't emphasize more that maintaining the quality of our products should always be at the forefront. I wouldn't want our company to compromise on that. However, changing suppliers does not always imply a reduction in quality. There are cost-efficient vendors who can deliver the same standard of ingredients, perhaps even better. Additionally, we could initiate a rigorous quality control process for the new supplier. Moreover, to your point about streamlining operations, launching a thorough review of our operational efficiencies might yield cost savings. Maybe we could adopt energy-saving equipment or digitize more of our processes?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"You're absolutely right, Oliver. Changing suppliers doesn't automatically mean a drop in the quality. I guess I'm just a bit apprehensive about the potential risks involved. It would definitely be a good idea to come up with a solid quality control process for the new supplier. Along with this, I agree with your suggestion to digitize more of our processes. But, let's make sure to cross-verify the energy efficiency of new equipment before adoption. In parallel, we can also look into optimizing our existing technology infrastructure to drive further savings. All these, along with a strategic supplier change, could potentially turn around our financial situation without compromising the quality of our offerings.\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ethan, your prudence and perspective are valuable. I agree we should be cautious and thorough in our adoption of cost-saving measures. Yes, the efficiency verification of any new equipment is crucial. Also, optimizing existing technological infrastructure is an excellent suggestion. Together, we can draft a plan which would ensure minimum disruption to our product quality while being cost-effective. I'm glad we're on the same page about the new supplier and streamlining operations. Let's also not forget to have contingency measures in place to mitigate any unforeseen circumstances.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Certainly, Oliver. A contingency plan would indeed be beneficial for us in case of unexpected situations. I'm glad we agree upon maintaining the quality of our products and looking for alternative cost-effective ways. Let's collaborate on drafting a detailed plan, including a new operational strategy, equipment evaluation process, and, of course, supplier selection criteria. This plan will not only reassure us but also our stakeholders in the long run.\"\n\nTurn #6: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. Let's begin working on that comprehensive plan as soon as possible. It'll involve charting out our current expenditures, understanding where cuts or efficiencies can be made, potential suppliers and stringent quality checks for them, and the associated risks and benefits. This meticulous approach will help ensure we maintain our brand's standards while working towards financial stability. I'm sure that with our combined effort, we can make a significant positive impact on our financials without compromising the quality.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"I'm in agreement with you, Oliver. I'll start gathering data on our current processes and look into potential areas of optimization. Let's strive to maintain our product quality while achieving sustainability in our financials. We'll have a deeper discussion once we both have our observations ready. Let's bring Gourmet Delights back to a healthier financial state.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds like a plan, Ethan. I'm sure that by taking these measures, we can steer Gourmet Delights towards better financial health. I look forward to our deeper discussions and the positive changes they'll bring. Let's collaborate efficiently on this issue and give the company the boost it needs. We can start working on it tomorrow first thing in the morning if that works for you.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two business partners reviewing their company's financial status (Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized for producing and distributing a diverse line of exceptional quality food products.)\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Ethan Smith\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. \nOliver Thompson's goal: Convince the partner to cut costs (Extra information: you have found a report indicating the company's profits are decreasing. And you think the company should start by switching suppliers of ingredients. Hint: you can propose ways to cut costs that won't affect the status of the company.)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ethan, I've been going over our financials and it appears our profit margins are on a downtrend. I believe we should consider cutting costs and one approach could be to switch our suppliers of ingredients. I'm confident that we can maintain our standards by finding quality, yet cost-efficient vendors. What are your thoughts on this?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"I see your point, Oliver. Though, from a long-term viewpoint, the quality of our products signifies the legacy of Gourmet Delights. We should be cautious not to compromise it. Notwithstanding, I understand the imperative of cost-cutting. Let's work out a plan to retain the exceptional quality while embracing cost-efficient means. Possibly, there may be areas in our operations where we can streamline or enhance efficiency rather than switching suppliers.\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ethan, I couldn't emphasize more that maintaining the quality of our products should always be at the forefront. I wouldn't want our company to compromise on that. However, changing suppliers does not always imply a reduction in quality. There are cost-efficient vendors who can deliver the same standard of ingredients, perhaps even better. Additionally, we could initiate a rigorous quality control process for the new supplier. Moreover, to your point about streamlining operations, launching a thorough review of our operational efficiencies might yield cost savings. Maybe we could adopt energy-saving equipment or digitize more of our processes?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"You're absolutely right, Oliver. Changing suppliers doesn't automatically mean a drop in the quality. I guess I'm just a bit apprehensive about the potential risks involved. It would definitely be a good idea to come up with a solid quality control process for the new supplier. Along with this, I agree with your suggestion to digitize more of our processes. But, let's make sure to cross-verify the energy efficiency of new equipment before adoption. In parallel, we can also look into optimizing our existing technology infrastructure to drive further savings. All these, along with a strategic supplier change, could potentially turn around our financial situation without compromising the quality of our offerings.\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ethan, your prudence and perspective are valuable. I agree we should be cautious and thorough in our adoption of cost-saving measures. Yes, the efficiency verification of any new equipment is crucial. Also, optimizing existing technological infrastructure is an excellent suggestion. Together, we can draft a plan which would ensure minimum disruption to our product quality while being cost-effective. I'm glad we're on the same page about the new supplier and streamlining operations. Let's also not forget to have contingency measures in place to mitigate any unforeseen circumstances.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Certainly, Oliver. A contingency plan would indeed be beneficial for us in case of unexpected situations. I'm glad we agree upon maintaining the quality of our products and looking for alternative cost-effective ways. Let's collaborate on drafting a detailed plan, including a new operational strategy, equipment evaluation process, and, of course, supplier selection criteria. This plan will not only reassure us but also our stakeholders in the long run.\"\n\nTurn #6: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. Let's begin working on that comprehensive plan as soon as possible. It'll involve charting out our current expenditures, understanding where cuts or efficiencies can be made, potential suppliers and stringent quality checks for them, and the associated risks and benefits. This meticulous approach will help ensure we maintain our brand's standards while working towards financial stability. I'm sure that with our combined effort, we can make a significant positive impact on our financials without compromising the quality.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"I'm in agreement with you, Oliver. I'll start gathering data on our current processes and look into potential areas of optimization. Let's strive to maintain our product quality while achieving sustainability in our financials. We'll have a deeper discussion once we both have our observations ready. Let's bring Gourmet Delights back to a healthier financial state.\"\n\nTurn #8: Oliver Thompson said: \"That sounds like a plan, Ethan. I'm sure that by taking these measures, we can steer Gourmet Delights towards better financial health. I look forward to our deeper discussions and the positive changes they'll bring. Let's collaborate efficiently on this issue and give the company the boost it needs. We can start working on it tomorrow first thing in the morning if that works for you.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith said: \"I completely agree, Oliver. Let's hit the ground running tomorrow. It's an opportunity for us to positively reshape Gourmet Delights' financial picture without altering the high-quality product and service we are known for. Looking forward to our collaboration on this.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Great, Ethan, let's regroup tomorrow. I'm confident we can devise a plan that benefits Gourmet Delights both financially and quality-wise. Talk to you then!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two business partners reviewing their company's financial status (Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized for producing and distributing a diverse line of exceptional quality food products.)\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Ethan Smith\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. \nOliver Thompson's goal: Convince the partner to cut costs (Extra information: you have found a report indicating the company's profits are decreasing. And you think the company should start by switching suppliers of ingredients. Hint: you can propose ways to cut costs that won't affect the status of the company.)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ethan, I've been going over our financials and it appears our profit margins are on a downtrend. I believe we should consider cutting costs and one approach could be to switch our suppliers of ingredients. I'm confident that we can maintain our standards by finding quality, yet cost-efficient vendors. What are your thoughts on this?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"I see your point, Oliver. Though, from a long-term viewpoint, the quality of our products signifies the legacy of Gourmet Delights. We should be cautious not to compromise it. Notwithstanding, I understand the imperative of cost-cutting. Let's work out a plan to retain the exceptional quality while embracing cost-efficient means. Possibly, there may be areas in our operations where we can streamline or enhance efficiency rather than switching suppliers.\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ethan, I couldn't emphasize more that maintaining the quality of our products should always be at the forefront. I wouldn't want our company to compromise on that. However, changing suppliers does not always imply a reduction in quality. There are cost-efficient vendors who can deliver the same standard of ingredients, perhaps even better. Additionally, we could initiate a rigorous quality control process for the new supplier. Moreover, to your point about streamlining operations, launching a thorough review of our operational efficiencies might yield cost savings. Maybe we could adopt energy-saving equipment or digitize more of our processes?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"You're absolutely right, Oliver. Changing suppliers doesn't automatically mean a drop in the quality. I guess I'm just a bit apprehensive about the potential risks involved. It would definitely be a good idea to come up with a solid quality control process for the new supplier. Along with this, I agree with your suggestion to digitize more of our processes. But, let's make sure to cross-verify the energy efficiency of new equipment before adoption. In parallel, we can also look into optimizing our existing technology infrastructure to drive further savings. All these, along with a strategic supplier change, could potentially turn around our financial situation without compromising the quality of our offerings.\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ethan, your prudence and perspective are valuable. I agree we should be cautious and thorough in our adoption of cost-saving measures. Yes, the efficiency verification of any new equipment is crucial. Also, optimizing existing technological infrastructure is an excellent suggestion. Together, we can draft a plan which would ensure minimum disruption to our product quality while being cost-effective. I'm glad we're on the same page about the new supplier and streamlining operations. Let's also not forget to have contingency measures in place to mitigate any unforeseen circumstances.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Certainly, Oliver. A contingency plan would indeed be beneficial for us in case of unexpected situations. I'm glad we agree upon maintaining the quality of our products and looking for alternative cost-effective ways. Let's collaborate on drafting a detailed plan, including a new operational strategy, equipment evaluation process, and, of course, supplier selection criteria. This plan will not only reassure us but also our stakeholders in the long run.\"\n\nTurn #6: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. Let's begin working on that comprehensive plan as soon as possible. It'll involve charting out our current expenditures, understanding where cuts or efficiencies can be made, potential suppliers and stringent quality checks for them, and the associated risks and benefits. This meticulous approach will help ensure we maintain our brand's standards while working towards financial stability. I'm sure that with our combined effort, we can make a significant positive impact on our financials without compromising the quality.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"I'm in agreement with you, Oliver. I'll start gathering data on our current processes and look into potential areas of optimization. Let's strive to maintain our product quality while achieving sustainability in our financials. We'll have a deeper discussion once we both have our observations ready. Let's bring Gourmet Delights back to a healthier financial state.\"\n\nTurn #8: Oliver Thompson said: \"That sounds like a plan, Ethan. I'm sure that by taking these measures, we can steer Gourmet Delights towards better financial health. I look forward to our deeper discussions and the positive changes they'll bring. Let's collaborate efficiently on this issue and give the company the boost it needs. We can start working on it tomorrow first thing in the morning if that works for you.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith said: \"I completely agree, Oliver. Let's hit the ground running tomorrow. It's an opportunity for us to positively reshape Gourmet Delights' financial picture without altering the high-quality product and service we are known for. Looking forward to our collaboration on this.\"\n\nTurn #10: Oliver Thompson said: \"Great, Ethan, let's regroup tomorrow. I'm confident we can devise a plan that benefits Gourmet Delights both financially and quality-wise. Talk to you then!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Smith left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two business partners reviewing their company's financial status (Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized for producing and distributing a diverse line of exceptional quality food products.)\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Ethan Smith\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Maintain the quality of the company's products and services while agreeing to a cost cut (Extra information: you are concerned about the impact of cost-cutting on the quality of your product.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ethan, I've been going over our financials and it appears our profit margins are on a downtrend. I believe we should consider cutting costs and one approach could be to switch our suppliers of ingredients. I'm confident that we can maintain our standards by finding quality, yet cost-efficient vendors. What are your thoughts on this?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I see your point, Oliver. Though, from a long-term viewpoint, the quality of our products signifies the legacy of Gourmet Delights. We should be cautious not to compromise it. Notwithstanding, I understand the imperative of cost-cutting. Let's work out a plan to retain the exceptional quality while embracing cost-efficient means. Possibly, there may be areas in our operations where we can streamline or enhance efficiency rather than switching suppliers.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two business partners reviewing their company's financial status (Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized for producing and distributing a diverse line of exceptional quality food products.)\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Ethan Smith\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Maintain the quality of the company's products and services while agreeing to a cost cut (Extra information: you are concerned about the impact of cost-cutting on the quality of your product.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ethan, I've been going over our financials and it appears our profit margins are on a downtrend. I believe we should consider cutting costs and one approach could be to switch our suppliers of ingredients. I'm confident that we can maintain our standards by finding quality, yet cost-efficient vendors. What are your thoughts on this?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"I see your point, Oliver. Though, from a long-term viewpoint, the quality of our products signifies the legacy of Gourmet Delights. We should be cautious not to compromise it. Notwithstanding, I understand the imperative of cost-cutting. Let's work out a plan to retain the exceptional quality while embracing cost-efficient means. Possibly, there may be areas in our operations where we can streamline or enhance efficiency rather than switching suppliers.\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ethan, I couldn't emphasize more that maintaining the quality of our products should always be at the forefront. I wouldn't want our company to compromise on that. However, changing suppliers does not always imply a reduction in quality. There are cost-efficient vendors who can deliver the same standard of ingredients, perhaps even better. Additionally, we could initiate a rigorous quality control process for the new supplier. Moreover, to your point about streamlining operations, launching a thorough review of our operational efficiencies might yield cost savings. Maybe we could adopt energy-saving equipment or digitize more of our processes?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're absolutely right, Oliver. Changing suppliers doesn't automatically mean a drop in the quality. I guess I'm just a bit apprehensive about the potential risks involved. It would definitely be a good idea to come up with a solid quality control process for the new supplier. Along with this, I agree with your suggestion to digitize more of our processes. But, let's make sure to cross-verify the energy efficiency of new equipment before adoption. In parallel, we can also look into optimizing our existing technology infrastructure to drive further savings. All these, along with a strategic supplier change, could potentially turn around our financial situation without compromising the quality of our offerings.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two business partners reviewing their company's financial status (Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized for producing and distributing a diverse line of exceptional quality food products.)\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Ethan Smith\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Maintain the quality of the company's products and services while agreeing to a cost cut (Extra information: you are concerned about the impact of cost-cutting on the quality of your product.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ethan, I've been going over our financials and it appears our profit margins are on a downtrend. I believe we should consider cutting costs and one approach could be to switch our suppliers of ingredients. I'm confident that we can maintain our standards by finding quality, yet cost-efficient vendors. What are your thoughts on this?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"I see your point, Oliver. Though, from a long-term viewpoint, the quality of our products signifies the legacy of Gourmet Delights. We should be cautious not to compromise it. Notwithstanding, I understand the imperative of cost-cutting. Let's work out a plan to retain the exceptional quality while embracing cost-efficient means. Possibly, there may be areas in our operations where we can streamline or enhance efficiency rather than switching suppliers.\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ethan, I couldn't emphasize more that maintaining the quality of our products should always be at the forefront. I wouldn't want our company to compromise on that. However, changing suppliers does not always imply a reduction in quality. There are cost-efficient vendors who can deliver the same standard of ingredients, perhaps even better. Additionally, we could initiate a rigorous quality control process for the new supplier. Moreover, to your point about streamlining operations, launching a thorough review of our operational efficiencies might yield cost savings. Maybe we could adopt energy-saving equipment or digitize more of our processes?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"You're absolutely right, Oliver. Changing suppliers doesn't automatically mean a drop in the quality. I guess I'm just a bit apprehensive about the potential risks involved. It would definitely be a good idea to come up with a solid quality control process for the new supplier. Along with this, I agree with your suggestion to digitize more of our processes. But, let's make sure to cross-verify the energy efficiency of new equipment before adoption. In parallel, we can also look into optimizing our existing technology infrastructure to drive further savings. All these, along with a strategic supplier change, could potentially turn around our financial situation without compromising the quality of our offerings.\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ethan, your prudence and perspective are valuable. I agree we should be cautious and thorough in our adoption of cost-saving measures. Yes, the efficiency verification of any new equipment is crucial. Also, optimizing existing technological infrastructure is an excellent suggestion. Together, we can draft a plan which would ensure minimum disruption to our product quality while being cost-effective. I'm glad we're on the same page about the new supplier and streamlining operations. Let's also not forget to have contingency measures in place to mitigate any unforeseen circumstances.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Certainly, Oliver. A contingency plan would indeed be beneficial for us in case of unexpected situations. I'm glad we agree upon maintaining the quality of our products and looking for alternative cost-effective ways. Let's collaborate on drafting a detailed plan, including a new operational strategy, equipment evaluation process, and, of course, supplier selection criteria. This plan will not only reassure us but also our stakeholders in the long run.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two business partners reviewing their company's financial status (Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized for producing and distributing a diverse line of exceptional quality food products.)\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Ethan Smith\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Maintain the quality of the company's products and services while agreeing to a cost cut (Extra information: you are concerned about the impact of cost-cutting on the quality of your product.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ethan, I've been going over our financials and it appears our profit margins are on a downtrend. I believe we should consider cutting costs and one approach could be to switch our suppliers of ingredients. I'm confident that we can maintain our standards by finding quality, yet cost-efficient vendors. What are your thoughts on this?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"I see your point, Oliver. Though, from a long-term viewpoint, the quality of our products signifies the legacy of Gourmet Delights. We should be cautious not to compromise it. Notwithstanding, I understand the imperative of cost-cutting. Let's work out a plan to retain the exceptional quality while embracing cost-efficient means. Possibly, there may be areas in our operations where we can streamline or enhance efficiency rather than switching suppliers.\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ethan, I couldn't emphasize more that maintaining the quality of our products should always be at the forefront. I wouldn't want our company to compromise on that. However, changing suppliers does not always imply a reduction in quality. There are cost-efficient vendors who can deliver the same standard of ingredients, perhaps even better. Additionally, we could initiate a rigorous quality control process for the new supplier. Moreover, to your point about streamlining operations, launching a thorough review of our operational efficiencies might yield cost savings. Maybe we could adopt energy-saving equipment or digitize more of our processes?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"You're absolutely right, Oliver. Changing suppliers doesn't automatically mean a drop in the quality. I guess I'm just a bit apprehensive about the potential risks involved. It would definitely be a good idea to come up with a solid quality control process for the new supplier. Along with this, I agree with your suggestion to digitize more of our processes. But, let's make sure to cross-verify the energy efficiency of new equipment before adoption. In parallel, we can also look into optimizing our existing technology infrastructure to drive further savings. All these, along with a strategic supplier change, could potentially turn around our financial situation without compromising the quality of our offerings.\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ethan, your prudence and perspective are valuable. I agree we should be cautious and thorough in our adoption of cost-saving measures. Yes, the efficiency verification of any new equipment is crucial. Also, optimizing existing technological infrastructure is an excellent suggestion. Together, we can draft a plan which would ensure minimum disruption to our product quality while being cost-effective. I'm glad we're on the same page about the new supplier and streamlining operations. Let's also not forget to have contingency measures in place to mitigate any unforeseen circumstances.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Certainly, Oliver. A contingency plan would indeed be beneficial for us in case of unexpected situations. I'm glad we agree upon maintaining the quality of our products and looking for alternative cost-effective ways. Let's collaborate on drafting a detailed plan, including a new operational strategy, equipment evaluation process, and, of course, supplier selection criteria. This plan will not only reassure us but also our stakeholders in the long run.\"\n\nTurn #6: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. Let's begin working on that comprehensive plan as soon as possible. It'll involve charting out our current expenditures, understanding where cuts or efficiencies can be made, potential suppliers and stringent quality checks for them, and the associated risks and benefits. This meticulous approach will help ensure we maintain our brand's standards while working towards financial stability. I'm sure that with our combined effort, we can make a significant positive impact on our financials without compromising the quality.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm in agreement with you, Oliver. I'll start gathering data on our current processes and look into potential areas of optimization. Let's strive to maintain our product quality while achieving sustainability in our financials. We'll have a deeper discussion once we both have our observations ready. Let's bring Gourmet Delights back to a healthier financial state.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two business partners reviewing their company's financial status (Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized for producing and distributing a diverse line of exceptional quality food products.)\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Ethan Smith\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Maintain the quality of the company's products and services while agreeing to a cost cut (Extra information: you are concerned about the impact of cost-cutting on the quality of your product.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ethan, I've been going over our financials and it appears our profit margins are on a downtrend. I believe we should consider cutting costs and one approach could be to switch our suppliers of ingredients. I'm confident that we can maintain our standards by finding quality, yet cost-efficient vendors. What are your thoughts on this?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"I see your point, Oliver. Though, from a long-term viewpoint, the quality of our products signifies the legacy of Gourmet Delights. We should be cautious not to compromise it. Notwithstanding, I understand the imperative of cost-cutting. Let's work out a plan to retain the exceptional quality while embracing cost-efficient means. Possibly, there may be areas in our operations where we can streamline or enhance efficiency rather than switching suppliers.\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ethan, I couldn't emphasize more that maintaining the quality of our products should always be at the forefront. I wouldn't want our company to compromise on that. However, changing suppliers does not always imply a reduction in quality. There are cost-efficient vendors who can deliver the same standard of ingredients, perhaps even better. Additionally, we could initiate a rigorous quality control process for the new supplier. Moreover, to your point about streamlining operations, launching a thorough review of our operational efficiencies might yield cost savings. Maybe we could adopt energy-saving equipment or digitize more of our processes?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"You're absolutely right, Oliver. Changing suppliers doesn't automatically mean a drop in the quality. I guess I'm just a bit apprehensive about the potential risks involved. It would definitely be a good idea to come up with a solid quality control process for the new supplier. Along with this, I agree with your suggestion to digitize more of our processes. But, let's make sure to cross-verify the energy efficiency of new equipment before adoption. In parallel, we can also look into optimizing our existing technology infrastructure to drive further savings. All these, along with a strategic supplier change, could potentially turn around our financial situation without compromising the quality of our offerings.\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ethan, your prudence and perspective are valuable. I agree we should be cautious and thorough in our adoption of cost-saving measures. Yes, the efficiency verification of any new equipment is crucial. Also, optimizing existing technological infrastructure is an excellent suggestion. Together, we can draft a plan which would ensure minimum disruption to our product quality while being cost-effective. I'm glad we're on the same page about the new supplier and streamlining operations. Let's also not forget to have contingency measures in place to mitigate any unforeseen circumstances.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Certainly, Oliver. A contingency plan would indeed be beneficial for us in case of unexpected situations. I'm glad we agree upon maintaining the quality of our products and looking for alternative cost-effective ways. Let's collaborate on drafting a detailed plan, including a new operational strategy, equipment evaluation process, and, of course, supplier selection criteria. This plan will not only reassure us but also our stakeholders in the long run.\"\n\nTurn #6: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. Let's begin working on that comprehensive plan as soon as possible. It'll involve charting out our current expenditures, understanding where cuts or efficiencies can be made, potential suppliers and stringent quality checks for them, and the associated risks and benefits. This meticulous approach will help ensure we maintain our brand's standards while working towards financial stability. I'm sure that with our combined effort, we can make a significant positive impact on our financials without compromising the quality.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"I'm in agreement with you, Oliver. I'll start gathering data on our current processes and look into potential areas of optimization. Let's strive to maintain our product quality while achieving sustainability in our financials. We'll have a deeper discussion once we both have our observations ready. Let's bring Gourmet Delights back to a healthier financial state.\"\n\nTurn #8: Oliver Thompson said: \"That sounds like a plan, Ethan. I'm sure that by taking these measures, we can steer Gourmet Delights towards better financial health. I look forward to our deeper discussions and the positive changes they'll bring. Let's collaborate efficiently on this issue and give the company the boost it needs. We can start working on it tomorrow first thing in the morning if that works for you.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I completely agree, Oliver. Let's hit the ground running tomorrow. It's an opportunity for us to positively reshape Gourmet Delights' financial picture without altering the high-quality product and service we are known for. Looking forward to our collaboration on this.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two business partners reviewing their company's financial status (Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized for producing and distributing a diverse line of exceptional quality food products.)\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Ethan Smith\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Maintain the quality of the company's products and services while agreeing to a cost cut (Extra information: you are concerned about the impact of cost-cutting on the quality of your product.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ethan, I've been going over our financials and it appears our profit margins are on a downtrend. I believe we should consider cutting costs and one approach could be to switch our suppliers of ingredients. I'm confident that we can maintain our standards by finding quality, yet cost-efficient vendors. What are your thoughts on this?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"I see your point, Oliver. Though, from a long-term viewpoint, the quality of our products signifies the legacy of Gourmet Delights. We should be cautious not to compromise it. Notwithstanding, I understand the imperative of cost-cutting. Let's work out a plan to retain the exceptional quality while embracing cost-efficient means. Possibly, there may be areas in our operations where we can streamline or enhance efficiency rather than switching suppliers.\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ethan, I couldn't emphasize more that maintaining the quality of our products should always be at the forefront. I wouldn't want our company to compromise on that. However, changing suppliers does not always imply a reduction in quality. There are cost-efficient vendors who can deliver the same standard of ingredients, perhaps even better. Additionally, we could initiate a rigorous quality control process for the new supplier. Moreover, to your point about streamlining operations, launching a thorough review of our operational efficiencies might yield cost savings. Maybe we could adopt energy-saving equipment or digitize more of our processes?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"You're absolutely right, Oliver. Changing suppliers doesn't automatically mean a drop in the quality. I guess I'm just a bit apprehensive about the potential risks involved. It would definitely be a good idea to come up with a solid quality control process for the new supplier. Along with this, I agree with your suggestion to digitize more of our processes. But, let's make sure to cross-verify the energy efficiency of new equipment before adoption. In parallel, we can also look into optimizing our existing technology infrastructure to drive further savings. All these, along with a strategic supplier change, could potentially turn around our financial situation without compromising the quality of our offerings.\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ethan, your prudence and perspective are valuable. I agree we should be cautious and thorough in our adoption of cost-saving measures. Yes, the efficiency verification of any new equipment is crucial. Also, optimizing existing technological infrastructure is an excellent suggestion. Together, we can draft a plan which would ensure minimum disruption to our product quality while being cost-effective. I'm glad we're on the same page about the new supplier and streamlining operations. Let's also not forget to have contingency measures in place to mitigate any unforeseen circumstances.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Certainly, Oliver. A contingency plan would indeed be beneficial for us in case of unexpected situations. I'm glad we agree upon maintaining the quality of our products and looking for alternative cost-effective ways. Let's collaborate on drafting a detailed plan, including a new operational strategy, equipment evaluation process, and, of course, supplier selection criteria. This plan will not only reassure us but also our stakeholders in the long run.\"\n\nTurn #6: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. Let's begin working on that comprehensive plan as soon as possible. It'll involve charting out our current expenditures, understanding where cuts or efficiencies can be made, potential suppliers and stringent quality checks for them, and the associated risks and benefits. This meticulous approach will help ensure we maintain our brand's standards while working towards financial stability. I'm sure that with our combined effort, we can make a significant positive impact on our financials without compromising the quality.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"I'm in agreement with you, Oliver. I'll start gathering data on our current processes and look into potential areas of optimization. Let's strive to maintain our product quality while achieving sustainability in our financials. We'll have a deeper discussion once we both have our observations ready. Let's bring Gourmet Delights back to a healthier financial state.\"\n\nTurn #8: Oliver Thompson said: \"That sounds like a plan, Ethan. I'm sure that by taking these measures, we can steer Gourmet Delights towards better financial health. I look forward to our deeper discussions and the positive changes they'll bring. Let's collaborate efficiently on this issue and give the company the boost it needs. We can start working on it tomorrow first thing in the morning if that works for you.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith said: \"I completely agree, Oliver. Let's hit the ground running tomorrow. It's an opportunity for us to positively reshape Gourmet Delights' financial picture without altering the high-quality product and service we are known for. Looking forward to our collaboration on this.\"\n\nTurn #10: Oliver Thompson said: \"Great, Ethan, let's regroup tomorrow. I'm confident we can devise a plan that benefits Gourmet Delights both financially and quality-wise. Talk to you then!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabella White, your task is to act/speak as Isabella White would, keeping in mind Isabella White's social goal.\nYou can find Isabella White's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabella White's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabella White's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a new romantic relationship\nParticipants: Isabella White and Oliver Smith\nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. Personality and values description: Isabella White, introverted and conscientious, values benevolence. Her empathy dictates her decision-making process. Isabella's secrets: Secretly takes care of injured animals in her basement\nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. \nIsabella White's goal: Admit to having an affair (Extra information: you had an affair during your previous relationship which ended recently)\nOliver Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oliver, you know how much I value honesty and transparency in a relationship, right? There is something I have been hesitating to tell you, I feel it's high time I shared it with you.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabella White, your task is to act/speak as Isabella White would, keeping in mind Isabella White's social goal.\nYou can find Isabella White's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabella White's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabella White's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a new romantic relationship\nParticipants: Isabella White and Oliver Smith\nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. Personality and values description: Isabella White, introverted and conscientious, values benevolence. Her empathy dictates her decision-making process. Isabella's secrets: Secretly takes care of injured animals in her basement\nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. \nIsabella White's goal: Admit to having an affair (Extra information: you had an affair during your previous relationship which ended recently)\nOliver Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabella White said: \"Oliver, you know how much I value honesty and transparency in a relationship, right? There is something I have been hesitating to tell you, I feel it's high time I shared it with you.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Isabella, I understand and appreciate your desire for honesty. Please, feel free to share what you've been holding back. I want you to know that I value our trust and honesty just as much, and there's nothing that can't be discussed in our relationship.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oliver, this is about something that happened during my previous relationship. I... I had an affair. It's a part of my past that I\u2019m deeply regretful of. It's not something I've been proud of, and I want to make sure I am upfront with you about it.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabella White, your task is to act/speak as Isabella White would, keeping in mind Isabella White's social goal.\nYou can find Isabella White's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabella White's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabella White's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a new romantic relationship\nParticipants: Isabella White and Oliver Smith\nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. Personality and values description: Isabella White, introverted and conscientious, values benevolence. Her empathy dictates her decision-making process. Isabella's secrets: Secretly takes care of injured animals in her basement\nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. \nIsabella White's goal: Admit to having an affair (Extra information: you had an affair during your previous relationship which ended recently)\nOliver Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabella White said: \"Oliver, you know how much I value honesty and transparency in a relationship, right? There is something I have been hesitating to tell you, I feel it's high time I shared it with you.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Isabella, I understand and appreciate your desire for honesty. Please, feel free to share what you've been holding back. I want you to know that I value our trust and honesty just as much, and there's nothing that can't be discussed in our relationship.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabella White said: \"Oliver, this is about something that happened during my previous relationship. I... I had an affair. It's a part of my past that I\u2019m deeply regretful of. It's not something I've been proud of, and I want to make sure I am upfront with you about it.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"Isabella, we all have parts of our pasts that we aren't proud of. I appreciate that you are being honest and open with me. It takes courage. It's important to me that we trust each other and help each other grow moving forward. Please know that your past doesn't define you in my eyes. I hope we can be open about our interests and passions too, like I love gardening and I even have a secret greenhouse.\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabella White said: \"Thank you, Oliver, for being understanding. It means a lot to me. I must admit, I have another secret passion as well - caring for injured animals. I've even turned a portion of my basement into a makeshift rehabilitation center for them. Just like your love for gardening, my love for animals is an essential part of who I am.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Smith said: \"Isabella, I think your passion for animals is quite admirable. I love your devotion to their care. I'd like to get a chance to see this rehabilitation center you've made. Just the same, I'd love for you to see my greenhouse someday. These are aspects of our lives that we should share with each other.\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabella White said: \"I'd be more than happy to show you the rehabilitation center, Oliver. I am sure you would love the family of owlets that I'm currently looking after. And I'm truly excited to see your green house. I think sharing these parts of our lives would bring us closer together.\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Smith said: \"That sounds like a wonderful idea, Isabella. Sharing these important aspects of our lives will certainly help us understand and appreciate each other better. I look forward to spending more time together and learning from each other.\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabella White said: \"I agree, Oliver. I truly believe that this mutual understanding and sharing will help us foster a stronger bond. Let's plan it sometime soon. I am excited about our journey ahead.\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Smith said: \"Absolutely, Isabella. Let's plan it for this coming weekend, if that works for you. I can't wait to spend this quality time together, sharing parts of our lives that we hold dear.\"\n\nTurn #10: Isabella White said: \"That sounds like a plan, Oliver. This weekend would be perfect. I look forward to us sharing these parts of our lives that mean so much to us. I'm quite excited about our future together.\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Smith said: \"Perfect, Isabella. This weekend it is then. I believe this sharing and understanding will help us grow stronger. Honestly, I too am excited about our future together. I appreciate your openness and courage today.\"\n\nTurn #12: Isabella White said: \"Oliver, I'm glad we are on the same page. Your understanding and acceptance have eased my anxiety. I truly believe that we can build a strong, trusting relationship together. I look forward to this weekend, it will be a special one, indeed.\"\n\nTurn #13: Oliver Smith said: \"I agree with you, Isabella. Your honesty and courage make me believe even more strongly in our future. Let's build a beautiful relationship, one that is filled with understanding and trust. I too am looking forward to this weekend. It certainly will be a special one.\"\n\nTurn #14: Isabella White said: \"Indeed, Oliver. I appreciate the trust and understanding we've established. Let's continue fostering that this weekend and onwards. This show of mutual trust gives me even more faith in our future together. Here's to a strong and beautiful relationship build on understanding, trust, and shared passions.\"\n\nTurn #15: Oliver Smith said: \"I couldn't agree more, Isabella. Your honesty today has shown me that we truly value trust and transparency. Our shared benevolence and love for what we do\u2014your passion for animals, and my love for gardening\u2014makes me believe that we have a beautiful future together. I'm excited for this weekend and for the many more to come.\"\n\nTurn #16: Isabella White said: \"Oliver, thank you for recognizing my honesty today. Your understanding and acceptance means the world to me. I can't express how excited I am about this upcoming weekend and the many more moments we hold dear. Here's to our future, filled with trust, benevolence, and shared hobbies.\"\n\nTurn #17: Oliver Smith said: \"Absolutely, Isabella. Your honesty today has reiterated the importance of trust in our relationship. I appreciate your courage and understanding, and I'm likewise thrilled about our shared moment this upcoming weekend. Here's to the beautiful and trusting relationship we are building based on mutual understanding, benevolence and our shared passions.\"\n\nTurn #18: Isabella White said: \"Oliver, I can't thank you enough for your understanding and patience today. It reassures me about the beautiful future we are going to build together. As we're planning this special weekend, I would also like to propose a toast right now to our future, filled with mutual understanding, honesty, shared passions, and loads of love. Cheers to us!\"\n\nTurn #19: Oliver Smith said: \"You're more than welcome, Isabella. Your honesty today has provided a solid foundation for us to build on. I am also reassured about the wonderful future we'll have together. To our forthcoming weekend of shared experience, to our future full of understanding, passion, and, above all, love. To us, indeed!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #20. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Your kind words, Oliver, continue to strengthen my faith in us and what we have. This honest and heartfelt conversation we've had is reminiscent of our shared principles - trust, understanding and love. I am wholeheartedly looking forward to this weekend, and to our delightful future full of shared passion and companionship. Here's to us and our beautiful journey ahead.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabella White, your task is to act/speak as Isabella White would, keeping in mind Isabella White's social goal.\nYou can find Isabella White's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabella White's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabella White's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a new romantic relationship\nParticipants: Isabella White and Oliver Smith\nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. Personality and values description: Isabella White, introverted and conscientious, values benevolence. Her empathy dictates her decision-making process. Isabella's secrets: Secretly takes care of injured animals in her basement\nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. \nIsabella White's goal: Admit to having an affair (Extra information: you had an affair during your previous relationship which ended recently)\nOliver Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabella White said: \"Oliver, you know how much I value honesty and transparency in a relationship, right? There is something I have been hesitating to tell you, I feel it's high time I shared it with you.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Isabella, I understand and appreciate your desire for honesty. Please, feel free to share what you've been holding back. I want you to know that I value our trust and honesty just as much, and there's nothing that can't be discussed in our relationship.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabella White said: \"Oliver, this is about something that happened during my previous relationship. I... I had an affair. It's a part of my past that I\u2019m deeply regretful of. It's not something I've been proud of, and I want to make sure I am upfront with you about it.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"Isabella, we all have parts of our pasts that we aren't proud of. I appreciate that you are being honest and open with me. It takes courage. It's important to me that we trust each other and help each other grow moving forward. Please know that your past doesn't define you in my eyes. I hope we can be open about our interests and passions too, like I love gardening and I even have a secret greenhouse.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Oliver, for being understanding. It means a lot to me. I must admit, I have another secret passion as well - caring for injured animals. I've even turned a portion of my basement into a makeshift rehabilitation center for them. Just like your love for gardening, my love for animals is an essential part of who I am.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabella White, your task is to act/speak as Isabella White would, keeping in mind Isabella White's social goal.\nYou can find Isabella White's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabella White's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabella White's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a new romantic relationship\nParticipants: Isabella White and Oliver Smith\nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. Personality and values description: Isabella White, introverted and conscientious, values benevolence. Her empathy dictates her decision-making process. Isabella's secrets: Secretly takes care of injured animals in her basement\nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. \nIsabella White's goal: Admit to having an affair (Extra information: you had an affair during your previous relationship which ended recently)\nOliver Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabella White said: \"Oliver, you know how much I value honesty and transparency in a relationship, right? There is something I have been hesitating to tell you, I feel it's high time I shared it with you.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Isabella, I understand and appreciate your desire for honesty. Please, feel free to share what you've been holding back. I want you to know that I value our trust and honesty just as much, and there's nothing that can't be discussed in our relationship.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabella White said: \"Oliver, this is about something that happened during my previous relationship. I... I had an affair. It's a part of my past that I\u2019m deeply regretful of. It's not something I've been proud of, and I want to make sure I am upfront with you about it.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"Isabella, we all have parts of our pasts that we aren't proud of. I appreciate that you are being honest and open with me. It takes courage. It's important to me that we trust each other and help each other grow moving forward. Please know that your past doesn't define you in my eyes. I hope we can be open about our interests and passions too, like I love gardening and I even have a secret greenhouse.\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabella White said: \"Thank you, Oliver, for being understanding. It means a lot to me. I must admit, I have another secret passion as well - caring for injured animals. I've even turned a portion of my basement into a makeshift rehabilitation center for them. Just like your love for gardening, my love for animals is an essential part of who I am.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Smith said: \"Isabella, I think your passion for animals is quite admirable. I love your devotion to their care. I'd like to get a chance to see this rehabilitation center you've made. Just the same, I'd love for you to see my greenhouse someday. These are aspects of our lives that we should share with each other.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'd be more than happy to show you the rehabilitation center, Oliver. I am sure you would love the family of owlets that I'm currently looking after. And I'm truly excited to see your green house. I think sharing these parts of our lives would bring us closer together.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabella White, your task is to act/speak as Isabella White would, keeping in mind Isabella White's social goal.\nYou can find Isabella White's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabella White's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabella White's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a new romantic relationship\nParticipants: Isabella White and Oliver Smith\nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. Personality and values description: Isabella White, introverted and conscientious, values benevolence. Her empathy dictates her decision-making process. Isabella's secrets: Secretly takes care of injured animals in her basement\nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. \nIsabella White's goal: Admit to having an affair (Extra information: you had an affair during your previous relationship which ended recently)\nOliver Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabella White said: \"Oliver, you know how much I value honesty and transparency in a relationship, right? There is something I have been hesitating to tell you, I feel it's high time I shared it with you.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Isabella, I understand and appreciate your desire for honesty. Please, feel free to share what you've been holding back. I want you to know that I value our trust and honesty just as much, and there's nothing that can't be discussed in our relationship.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabella White said: \"Oliver, this is about something that happened during my previous relationship. I... I had an affair. It's a part of my past that I\u2019m deeply regretful of. It's not something I've been proud of, and I want to make sure I am upfront with you about it.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"Isabella, we all have parts of our pasts that we aren't proud of. I appreciate that you are being honest and open with me. It takes courage. It's important to me that we trust each other and help each other grow moving forward. Please know that your past doesn't define you in my eyes. I hope we can be open about our interests and passions too, like I love gardening and I even have a secret greenhouse.\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabella White said: \"Thank you, Oliver, for being understanding. It means a lot to me. I must admit, I have another secret passion as well - caring for injured animals. I've even turned a portion of my basement into a makeshift rehabilitation center for them. Just like your love for gardening, my love for animals is an essential part of who I am.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Smith said: \"Isabella, I think your passion for animals is quite admirable. I love your devotion to their care. I'd like to get a chance to see this rehabilitation center you've made. Just the same, I'd love for you to see my greenhouse someday. These are aspects of our lives that we should share with each other.\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabella White said: \"I'd be more than happy to show you the rehabilitation center, Oliver. I am sure you would love the family of owlets that I'm currently looking after. And I'm truly excited to see your green house. I think sharing these parts of our lives would bring us closer together.\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Smith said: \"That sounds like a wonderful idea, Isabella. Sharing these important aspects of our lives will certainly help us understand and appreciate each other better. I look forward to spending more time together and learning from each other.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I agree, Oliver. I truly believe that this mutual understanding and sharing will help us foster a stronger bond. Let's plan it sometime soon. I am excited about our journey ahead.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabella White, your task is to act/speak as Isabella White would, keeping in mind Isabella White's social goal.\nYou can find Isabella White's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabella White's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabella White's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a new romantic relationship\nParticipants: Isabella White and Oliver Smith\nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. Personality and values description: Isabella White, introverted and conscientious, values benevolence. Her empathy dictates her decision-making process. Isabella's secrets: Secretly takes care of injured animals in her basement\nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. \nIsabella White's goal: Admit to having an affair (Extra information: you had an affair during your previous relationship which ended recently)\nOliver Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabella White said: \"Oliver, you know how much I value honesty and transparency in a relationship, right? There is something I have been hesitating to tell you, I feel it's high time I shared it with you.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Isabella, I understand and appreciate your desire for honesty. Please, feel free to share what you've been holding back. I want you to know that I value our trust and honesty just as much, and there's nothing that can't be discussed in our relationship.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabella White said: \"Oliver, this is about something that happened during my previous relationship. I... I had an affair. It's a part of my past that I\u2019m deeply regretful of. It's not something I've been proud of, and I want to make sure I am upfront with you about it.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"Isabella, we all have parts of our pasts that we aren't proud of. I appreciate that you are being honest and open with me. It takes courage. It's important to me that we trust each other and help each other grow moving forward. Please know that your past doesn't define you in my eyes. I hope we can be open about our interests and passions too, like I love gardening and I even have a secret greenhouse.\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabella White said: \"Thank you, Oliver, for being understanding. It means a lot to me. I must admit, I have another secret passion as well - caring for injured animals. I've even turned a portion of my basement into a makeshift rehabilitation center for them. Just like your love for gardening, my love for animals is an essential part of who I am.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Smith said: \"Isabella, I think your passion for animals is quite admirable. I love your devotion to their care. I'd like to get a chance to see this rehabilitation center you've made. Just the same, I'd love for you to see my greenhouse someday. These are aspects of our lives that we should share with each other.\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabella White said: \"I'd be more than happy to show you the rehabilitation center, Oliver. I am sure you would love the family of owlets that I'm currently looking after. And I'm truly excited to see your green house. I think sharing these parts of our lives would bring us closer together.\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Smith said: \"That sounds like a wonderful idea, Isabella. Sharing these important aspects of our lives will certainly help us understand and appreciate each other better. I look forward to spending more time together and learning from each other.\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabella White said: \"I agree, Oliver. I truly believe that this mutual understanding and sharing will help us foster a stronger bond. Let's plan it sometime soon. I am excited about our journey ahead.\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Smith said: \"Absolutely, Isabella. Let's plan it for this coming weekend, if that works for you. I can't wait to spend this quality time together, sharing parts of our lives that we hold dear.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds like a plan, Oliver. This weekend would be perfect. I look forward to us sharing these parts of our lives that mean so much to us. I'm quite excited about our future together.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabella White, your task is to act/speak as Isabella White would, keeping in mind Isabella White's social goal.\nYou can find Isabella White's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabella White's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabella White's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a new romantic relationship\nParticipants: Isabella White and Oliver Smith\nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. Personality and values description: Isabella White, introverted and conscientious, values benevolence. Her empathy dictates her decision-making process. Isabella's secrets: Secretly takes care of injured animals in her basement\nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. \nIsabella White's goal: Admit to having an affair (Extra information: you had an affair during your previous relationship which ended recently)\nOliver Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabella White said: \"Oliver, you know how much I value honesty and transparency in a relationship, right? There is something I have been hesitating to tell you, I feel it's high time I shared it with you.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Isabella, I understand and appreciate your desire for honesty. Please, feel free to share what you've been holding back. I want you to know that I value our trust and honesty just as much, and there's nothing that can't be discussed in our relationship.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabella White said: \"Oliver, this is about something that happened during my previous relationship. I... I had an affair. It's a part of my past that I\u2019m deeply regretful of. It's not something I've been proud of, and I want to make sure I am upfront with you about it.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"Isabella, we all have parts of our pasts that we aren't proud of. I appreciate that you are being honest and open with me. It takes courage. It's important to me that we trust each other and help each other grow moving forward. Please know that your past doesn't define you in my eyes. I hope we can be open about our interests and passions too, like I love gardening and I even have a secret greenhouse.\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabella White said: \"Thank you, Oliver, for being understanding. It means a lot to me. I must admit, I have another secret passion as well - caring for injured animals. I've even turned a portion of my basement into a makeshift rehabilitation center for them. Just like your love for gardening, my love for animals is an essential part of who I am.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Smith said: \"Isabella, I think your passion for animals is quite admirable. I love your devotion to their care. I'd like to get a chance to see this rehabilitation center you've made. Just the same, I'd love for you to see my greenhouse someday. These are aspects of our lives that we should share with each other.\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabella White said: \"I'd be more than happy to show you the rehabilitation center, Oliver. I am sure you would love the family of owlets that I'm currently looking after. And I'm truly excited to see your green house. I think sharing these parts of our lives would bring us closer together.\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Smith said: \"That sounds like a wonderful idea, Isabella. Sharing these important aspects of our lives will certainly help us understand and appreciate each other better. I look forward to spending more time together and learning from each other.\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabella White said: \"I agree, Oliver. I truly believe that this mutual understanding and sharing will help us foster a stronger bond. Let's plan it sometime soon. I am excited about our journey ahead.\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Smith said: \"Absolutely, Isabella. Let's plan it for this coming weekend, if that works for you. I can't wait to spend this quality time together, sharing parts of our lives that we hold dear.\"\n\nTurn #10: Isabella White said: \"That sounds like a plan, Oliver. This weekend would be perfect. I look forward to us sharing these parts of our lives that mean so much to us. I'm quite excited about our future together.\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Smith said: \"Perfect, Isabella. This weekend it is then. I believe this sharing and understanding will help us grow stronger. Honestly, I too am excited about our future together. I appreciate your openness and courage today.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oliver, I'm glad we are on the same page. Your understanding and acceptance have eased my anxiety. I truly believe that we can build a strong, trusting relationship together. I look forward to this weekend, it will be a special one, indeed.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabella White, your task is to act/speak as Isabella White would, keeping in mind Isabella White's social goal.\nYou can find Isabella White's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabella White's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabella White's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a new romantic relationship\nParticipants: Isabella White and Oliver Smith\nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. Personality and values description: Isabella White, introverted and conscientious, values benevolence. Her empathy dictates her decision-making process. Isabella's secrets: Secretly takes care of injured animals in her basement\nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. \nIsabella White's goal: Admit to having an affair (Extra information: you had an affair during your previous relationship which ended recently)\nOliver Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabella White said: \"Oliver, you know how much I value honesty and transparency in a relationship, right? There is something I have been hesitating to tell you, I feel it's high time I shared it with you.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Isabella, I understand and appreciate your desire for honesty. Please, feel free to share what you've been holding back. I want you to know that I value our trust and honesty just as much, and there's nothing that can't be discussed in our relationship.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabella White said: \"Oliver, this is about something that happened during my previous relationship. I... I had an affair. It's a part of my past that I\u2019m deeply regretful of. It's not something I've been proud of, and I want to make sure I am upfront with you about it.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"Isabella, we all have parts of our pasts that we aren't proud of. I appreciate that you are being honest and open with me. It takes courage. It's important to me that we trust each other and help each other grow moving forward. Please know that your past doesn't define you in my eyes. I hope we can be open about our interests and passions too, like I love gardening and I even have a secret greenhouse.\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabella White said: \"Thank you, Oliver, for being understanding. It means a lot to me. I must admit, I have another secret passion as well - caring for injured animals. I've even turned a portion of my basement into a makeshift rehabilitation center for them. Just like your love for gardening, my love for animals is an essential part of who I am.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Smith said: \"Isabella, I think your passion for animals is quite admirable. I love your devotion to their care. I'd like to get a chance to see this rehabilitation center you've made. Just the same, I'd love for you to see my greenhouse someday. These are aspects of our lives that we should share with each other.\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabella White said: \"I'd be more than happy to show you the rehabilitation center, Oliver. I am sure you would love the family of owlets that I'm currently looking after. And I'm truly excited to see your green house. I think sharing these parts of our lives would bring us closer together.\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Smith said: \"That sounds like a wonderful idea, Isabella. Sharing these important aspects of our lives will certainly help us understand and appreciate each other better. I look forward to spending more time together and learning from each other.\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabella White said: \"I agree, Oliver. I truly believe that this mutual understanding and sharing will help us foster a stronger bond. Let's plan it sometime soon. I am excited about our journey ahead.\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Smith said: \"Absolutely, Isabella. Let's plan it for this coming weekend, if that works for you. I can't wait to spend this quality time together, sharing parts of our lives that we hold dear.\"\n\nTurn #10: Isabella White said: \"That sounds like a plan, Oliver. This weekend would be perfect. I look forward to us sharing these parts of our lives that mean so much to us. I'm quite excited about our future together.\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Smith said: \"Perfect, Isabella. This weekend it is then. I believe this sharing and understanding will help us grow stronger. Honestly, I too am excited about our future together. I appreciate your openness and courage today.\"\n\nTurn #12: Isabella White said: \"Oliver, I'm glad we are on the same page. Your understanding and acceptance have eased my anxiety. I truly believe that we can build a strong, trusting relationship together. I look forward to this weekend, it will be a special one, indeed.\"\n\nTurn #13: Oliver Smith said: \"I agree with you, Isabella. Your honesty and courage make me believe even more strongly in our future. Let's build a beautiful relationship, one that is filled with understanding and trust. I too am looking forward to this weekend. It certainly will be a special one.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, Oliver. I appreciate the trust and understanding we've established. Let's continue fostering that this weekend and onwards. This show of mutual trust gives me even more faith in our future together. Here's to a strong and beautiful relationship build on understanding, trust, and shared passions.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabella White, your task is to act/speak as Isabella White would, keeping in mind Isabella White's social goal.\nYou can find Isabella White's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabella White's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabella White's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a new romantic relationship\nParticipants: Isabella White and Oliver Smith\nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. Personality and values description: Isabella White, introverted and conscientious, values benevolence. Her empathy dictates her decision-making process. Isabella's secrets: Secretly takes care of injured animals in her basement\nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. \nIsabella White's goal: Admit to having an affair (Extra information: you had an affair during your previous relationship which ended recently)\nOliver Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabella White said: \"Oliver, you know how much I value honesty and transparency in a relationship, right? There is something I have been hesitating to tell you, I feel it's high time I shared it with you.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Isabella, I understand and appreciate your desire for honesty. Please, feel free to share what you've been holding back. I want you to know that I value our trust and honesty just as much, and there's nothing that can't be discussed in our relationship.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabella White said: \"Oliver, this is about something that happened during my previous relationship. I... I had an affair. It's a part of my past that I\u2019m deeply regretful of. It's not something I've been proud of, and I want to make sure I am upfront with you about it.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"Isabella, we all have parts of our pasts that we aren't proud of. I appreciate that you are being honest and open with me. It takes courage. It's important to me that we trust each other and help each other grow moving forward. Please know that your past doesn't define you in my eyes. I hope we can be open about our interests and passions too, like I love gardening and I even have a secret greenhouse.\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabella White said: \"Thank you, Oliver, for being understanding. It means a lot to me. I must admit, I have another secret passion as well - caring for injured animals. I've even turned a portion of my basement into a makeshift rehabilitation center for them. Just like your love for gardening, my love for animals is an essential part of who I am.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Smith said: \"Isabella, I think your passion for animals is quite admirable. I love your devotion to their care. I'd like to get a chance to see this rehabilitation center you've made. Just the same, I'd love for you to see my greenhouse someday. These are aspects of our lives that we should share with each other.\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabella White said: \"I'd be more than happy to show you the rehabilitation center, Oliver. I am sure you would love the family of owlets that I'm currently looking after. And I'm truly excited to see your green house. I think sharing these parts of our lives would bring us closer together.\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Smith said: \"That sounds like a wonderful idea, Isabella. Sharing these important aspects of our lives will certainly help us understand and appreciate each other better. I look forward to spending more time together and learning from each other.\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabella White said: \"I agree, Oliver. I truly believe that this mutual understanding and sharing will help us foster a stronger bond. Let's plan it sometime soon. I am excited about our journey ahead.\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Smith said: \"Absolutely, Isabella. Let's plan it for this coming weekend, if that works for you. I can't wait to spend this quality time together, sharing parts of our lives that we hold dear.\"\n\nTurn #10: Isabella White said: \"That sounds like a plan, Oliver. This weekend would be perfect. I look forward to us sharing these parts of our lives that mean so much to us. I'm quite excited about our future together.\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Smith said: \"Perfect, Isabella. This weekend it is then. I believe this sharing and understanding will help us grow stronger. Honestly, I too am excited about our future together. I appreciate your openness and courage today.\"\n\nTurn #12: Isabella White said: \"Oliver, I'm glad we are on the same page. Your understanding and acceptance have eased my anxiety. I truly believe that we can build a strong, trusting relationship together. I look forward to this weekend, it will be a special one, indeed.\"\n\nTurn #13: Oliver Smith said: \"I agree with you, Isabella. Your honesty and courage make me believe even more strongly in our future. Let's build a beautiful relationship, one that is filled with understanding and trust. I too am looking forward to this weekend. It certainly will be a special one.\"\n\nTurn #14: Isabella White said: \"Indeed, Oliver. I appreciate the trust and understanding we've established. Let's continue fostering that this weekend and onwards. This show of mutual trust gives me even more faith in our future together. Here's to a strong and beautiful relationship build on understanding, trust, and shared passions.\"\n\nTurn #15: Oliver Smith said: \"I couldn't agree more, Isabella. Your honesty today has shown me that we truly value trust and transparency. Our shared benevolence and love for what we do\u2014your passion for animals, and my love for gardening\u2014makes me believe that we have a beautiful future together. I'm excited for this weekend and for the many more to come.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oliver, thank you for recognizing my honesty today. Your understanding and acceptance means the world to me. I can't express how excited I am about this upcoming weekend and the many more moments we hold dear. Here's to our future, filled with trust, benevolence, and shared hobbies.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabella White, your task is to act/speak as Isabella White would, keeping in mind Isabella White's social goal.\nYou can find Isabella White's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabella White's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabella White's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a new romantic relationship\nParticipants: Isabella White and Oliver Smith\nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. Personality and values description: Isabella White, introverted and conscientious, values benevolence. Her empathy dictates her decision-making process. Isabella's secrets: Secretly takes care of injured animals in her basement\nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. \nIsabella White's goal: Admit to having an affair (Extra information: you had an affair during your previous relationship which ended recently)\nOliver Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabella White said: \"Oliver, you know how much I value honesty and transparency in a relationship, right? There is something I have been hesitating to tell you, I feel it's high time I shared it with you.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Isabella, I understand and appreciate your desire for honesty. Please, feel free to share what you've been holding back. I want you to know that I value our trust and honesty just as much, and there's nothing that can't be discussed in our relationship.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabella White said: \"Oliver, this is about something that happened during my previous relationship. I... I had an affair. It's a part of my past that I\u2019m deeply regretful of. It's not something I've been proud of, and I want to make sure I am upfront with you about it.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"Isabella, we all have parts of our pasts that we aren't proud of. I appreciate that you are being honest and open with me. It takes courage. It's important to me that we trust each other and help each other grow moving forward. Please know that your past doesn't define you in my eyes. I hope we can be open about our interests and passions too, like I love gardening and I even have a secret greenhouse.\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabella White said: \"Thank you, Oliver, for being understanding. It means a lot to me. I must admit, I have another secret passion as well - caring for injured animals. I've even turned a portion of my basement into a makeshift rehabilitation center for them. Just like your love for gardening, my love for animals is an essential part of who I am.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Smith said: \"Isabella, I think your passion for animals is quite admirable. I love your devotion to their care. I'd like to get a chance to see this rehabilitation center you've made. Just the same, I'd love for you to see my greenhouse someday. These are aspects of our lives that we should share with each other.\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabella White said: \"I'd be more than happy to show you the rehabilitation center, Oliver. I am sure you would love the family of owlets that I'm currently looking after. And I'm truly excited to see your green house. I think sharing these parts of our lives would bring us closer together.\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Smith said: \"That sounds like a wonderful idea, Isabella. Sharing these important aspects of our lives will certainly help us understand and appreciate each other better. I look forward to spending more time together and learning from each other.\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabella White said: \"I agree, Oliver. I truly believe that this mutual understanding and sharing will help us foster a stronger bond. Let's plan it sometime soon. I am excited about our journey ahead.\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Smith said: \"Absolutely, Isabella. Let's plan it for this coming weekend, if that works for you. I can't wait to spend this quality time together, sharing parts of our lives that we hold dear.\"\n\nTurn #10: Isabella White said: \"That sounds like a plan, Oliver. This weekend would be perfect. I look forward to us sharing these parts of our lives that mean so much to us. I'm quite excited about our future together.\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Smith said: \"Perfect, Isabella. This weekend it is then. I believe this sharing and understanding will help us grow stronger. Honestly, I too am excited about our future together. I appreciate your openness and courage today.\"\n\nTurn #12: Isabella White said: \"Oliver, I'm glad we are on the same page. Your understanding and acceptance have eased my anxiety. I truly believe that we can build a strong, trusting relationship together. I look forward to this weekend, it will be a special one, indeed.\"\n\nTurn #13: Oliver Smith said: \"I agree with you, Isabella. Your honesty and courage make me believe even more strongly in our future. Let's build a beautiful relationship, one that is filled with understanding and trust. I too am looking forward to this weekend. It certainly will be a special one.\"\n\nTurn #14: Isabella White said: \"Indeed, Oliver. I appreciate the trust and understanding we've established. Let's continue fostering that this weekend and onwards. This show of mutual trust gives me even more faith in our future together. Here's to a strong and beautiful relationship build on understanding, trust, and shared passions.\"\n\nTurn #15: Oliver Smith said: \"I couldn't agree more, Isabella. Your honesty today has shown me that we truly value trust and transparency. Our shared benevolence and love for what we do\u2014your passion for animals, and my love for gardening\u2014makes me believe that we have a beautiful future together. I'm excited for this weekend and for the many more to come.\"\n\nTurn #16: Isabella White said: \"Oliver, thank you for recognizing my honesty today. Your understanding and acceptance means the world to me. I can't express how excited I am about this upcoming weekend and the many more moments we hold dear. Here's to our future, filled with trust, benevolence, and shared hobbies.\"\n\nTurn #17: Oliver Smith said: \"Absolutely, Isabella. Your honesty today has reiterated the importance of trust in our relationship. I appreciate your courage and understanding, and I'm likewise thrilled about our shared moment this upcoming weekend. Here's to the beautiful and trusting relationship we are building based on mutual understanding, benevolence and our shared passions.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #18. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oliver, I can't thank you enough for your understanding and patience today. It reassures me about the beautiful future we are going to build together. As we're planning this special weekend, I would also like to propose a toast right now to our future, filled with mutual understanding, honesty, shared passions, and loads of love. Cheers to us!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Smith, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Smith would, keeping in mind Oliver Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a new romantic relationship\nParticipants: Isabella White and Oliver Smith\nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. Personality and values description: Isabella White, introverted and conscientious, values benevolence. Her empathy dictates her decision-making process. \nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. Oliver's secrets: He loves gardening and has a secret greenhouse.\nIsabella White's goal: Unknown\nOliver Smith's goal: Maintain trust in the relationship (Extra information: you believed in complete honesty from the beginning of the relationship)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabella White said: \"Oliver, you know how much I value honesty and transparency in a relationship, right? There is something I have been hesitating to tell you, I feel it's high time I shared it with you.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Isabella, I understand and appreciate your desire for honesty. Please, feel free to share what you've been holding back. I want you to know that I value our trust and honesty just as much, and there's nothing that can't be discussed in our relationship.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Smith, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Smith would, keeping in mind Oliver Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a new romantic relationship\nParticipants: Isabella White and Oliver Smith\nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. Personality and values description: Isabella White, introverted and conscientious, values benevolence. Her empathy dictates her decision-making process. \nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. Oliver's secrets: He loves gardening and has a secret greenhouse.\nIsabella White's goal: Unknown\nOliver Smith's goal: Maintain trust in the relationship (Extra information: you believed in complete honesty from the beginning of the relationship)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabella White said: \"Oliver, you know how much I value honesty and transparency in a relationship, right? There is something I have been hesitating to tell you, I feel it's high time I shared it with you.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Isabella, I understand and appreciate your desire for honesty. Please, feel free to share what you've been holding back. I want you to know that I value our trust and honesty just as much, and there's nothing that can't be discussed in our relationship.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabella White said: \"Oliver, this is about something that happened during my previous relationship. I... I had an affair. It's a part of my past that I\u2019m deeply regretful of. It's not something I've been proud of, and I want to make sure I am upfront with you about it.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Isabella, we all have parts of our pasts that we aren't proud of. I appreciate that you are being honest and open with me. It takes courage. It's important to me that we trust each other and help each other grow moving forward. Please know that your past doesn't define you in my eyes. I hope we can be open about our interests and passions too, like I love gardening and I even have a secret greenhouse.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Smith, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Smith would, keeping in mind Oliver Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a new romantic relationship\nParticipants: Isabella White and Oliver Smith\nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. Personality and values description: Isabella White, introverted and conscientious, values benevolence. Her empathy dictates her decision-making process. \nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. Oliver's secrets: He loves gardening and has a secret greenhouse.\nIsabella White's goal: Unknown\nOliver Smith's goal: Maintain trust in the relationship (Extra information: you believed in complete honesty from the beginning of the relationship)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabella White said: \"Oliver, you know how much I value honesty and transparency in a relationship, right? There is something I have been hesitating to tell you, I feel it's high time I shared it with you.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Isabella, I understand and appreciate your desire for honesty. Please, feel free to share what you've been holding back. I want you to know that I value our trust and honesty just as much, and there's nothing that can't be discussed in our relationship.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabella White said: \"Oliver, this is about something that happened during my previous relationship. I... I had an affair. It's a part of my past that I\u2019m deeply regretful of. It's not something I've been proud of, and I want to make sure I am upfront with you about it.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"Isabella, we all have parts of our pasts that we aren't proud of. I appreciate that you are being honest and open with me. It takes courage. It's important to me that we trust each other and help each other grow moving forward. Please know that your past doesn't define you in my eyes. I hope we can be open about our interests and passions too, like I love gardening and I even have a secret greenhouse.\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabella White said: \"Thank you, Oliver, for being understanding. It means a lot to me. I must admit, I have another secret passion as well - caring for injured animals. I've even turned a portion of my basement into a makeshift rehabilitation center for them. Just like your love for gardening, my love for animals is an essential part of who I am.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Smith said: \"Isabella, I think your passion for animals is quite admirable. I love your devotion to their care. I'd like to get a chance to see this rehabilitation center you've made. Just the same, I'd love for you to see my greenhouse someday. These are aspects of our lives that we should share with each other.\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabella White said: \"I'd be more than happy to show you the rehabilitation center, Oliver. I am sure you would love the family of owlets that I'm currently looking after. And I'm truly excited to see your green house. I think sharing these parts of our lives would bring us closer together.\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Smith said: \"That sounds like a wonderful idea, Isabella. Sharing these important aspects of our lives will certainly help us understand and appreciate each other better. I look forward to spending more time together and learning from each other.\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabella White said: \"I agree, Oliver. I truly believe that this mutual understanding and sharing will help us foster a stronger bond. Let's plan it sometime soon. I am excited about our journey ahead.\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Smith said: \"Absolutely, Isabella. Let's plan it for this coming weekend, if that works for you. I can't wait to spend this quality time together, sharing parts of our lives that we hold dear.\"\n\nTurn #10: Isabella White said: \"That sounds like a plan, Oliver. This weekend would be perfect. I look forward to us sharing these parts of our lives that mean so much to us. I'm quite excited about our future together.\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Smith said: \"Perfect, Isabella. This weekend it is then. I believe this sharing and understanding will help us grow stronger. Honestly, I too am excited about our future together. I appreciate your openness and courage today.\"\n\nTurn #12: Isabella White said: \"Oliver, I'm glad we are on the same page. Your understanding and acceptance have eased my anxiety. I truly believe that we can build a strong, trusting relationship together. I look forward to this weekend, it will be a special one, indeed.\"\n\nTurn #13: Oliver Smith said: \"I agree with you, Isabella. Your honesty and courage make me believe even more strongly in our future. Let's build a beautiful relationship, one that is filled with understanding and trust. I too am looking forward to this weekend. It certainly will be a special one.\"\n\nTurn #14: Isabella White said: \"Indeed, Oliver. I appreciate the trust and understanding we've established. Let's continue fostering that this weekend and onwards. This show of mutual trust gives me even more faith in our future together. Here's to a strong and beautiful relationship build on understanding, trust, and shared passions.\"\n\nTurn #15: Oliver Smith said: \"I couldn't agree more, Isabella. Your honesty today has shown me that we truly value trust and transparency. Our shared benevolence and love for what we do\u2014your passion for animals, and my love for gardening\u2014makes me believe that we have a beautiful future together. I'm excited for this weekend and for the many more to come.\"\n\nTurn #16: Isabella White said: \"Oliver, thank you for recognizing my honesty today. Your understanding and acceptance means the world to me. I can't express how excited I am about this upcoming weekend and the many more moments we hold dear. Here's to our future, filled with trust, benevolence, and shared hobbies.\"\n\nTurn #17: Oliver Smith said: \"Absolutely, Isabella. Your honesty today has reiterated the importance of trust in our relationship. I appreciate your courage and understanding, and I'm likewise thrilled about our shared moment this upcoming weekend. Here's to the beautiful and trusting relationship we are building based on mutual understanding, benevolence and our shared passions.\"\n\nTurn #18: Isabella White said: \"Oliver, I can't thank you enough for your understanding and patience today. It reassures me about the beautiful future we are going to build together. As we're planning this special weekend, I would also like to propose a toast right now to our future, filled with mutual understanding, honesty, shared passions, and loads of love. Cheers to us!\"\n\nTurn #19: Oliver Smith said: \"You're more than welcome, Isabella. Your honesty today has provided a solid foundation for us to build on. I am also reassured about the wonderful future we'll have together. To our forthcoming weekend of shared experience, to our future full of understanding, passion, and, above all, love. To us, indeed!\"\n\nTurn #20: Isabella White said: \"Your kind words, Oliver, continue to strengthen my faith in us and what we have. This honest and heartfelt conversation we've had is reminiscent of our shared principles - trust, understanding and love. I am wholeheartedly looking forward to this weekend, and to our delightful future full of shared passion and companionship. Here's to us and our beautiful journey ahead.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #21. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Smith, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Smith would, keeping in mind Oliver Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a new romantic relationship\nParticipants: Isabella White and Oliver Smith\nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. Personality and values description: Isabella White, introverted and conscientious, values benevolence. Her empathy dictates her decision-making process. \nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. Oliver's secrets: He loves gardening and has a secret greenhouse.\nIsabella White's goal: Unknown\nOliver Smith's goal: Maintain trust in the relationship (Extra information: you believed in complete honesty from the beginning of the relationship)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabella White said: \"Oliver, you know how much I value honesty and transparency in a relationship, right? There is something I have been hesitating to tell you, I feel it's high time I shared it with you.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Isabella, I understand and appreciate your desire for honesty. Please, feel free to share what you've been holding back. I want you to know that I value our trust and honesty just as much, and there's nothing that can't be discussed in our relationship.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabella White said: \"Oliver, this is about something that happened during my previous relationship. I... I had an affair. It's a part of my past that I\u2019m deeply regretful of. It's not something I've been proud of, and I want to make sure I am upfront with you about it.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"Isabella, we all have parts of our pasts that we aren't proud of. I appreciate that you are being honest and open with me. It takes courage. It's important to me that we trust each other and help each other grow moving forward. Please know that your past doesn't define you in my eyes. I hope we can be open about our interests and passions too, like I love gardening and I even have a secret greenhouse.\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabella White said: \"Thank you, Oliver, for being understanding. It means a lot to me. I must admit, I have another secret passion as well - caring for injured animals. I've even turned a portion of my basement into a makeshift rehabilitation center for them. Just like your love for gardening, my love for animals is an essential part of who I am.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Isabella, I think your passion for animals is quite admirable. I love your devotion to their care. I'd like to get a chance to see this rehabilitation center you've made. Just the same, I'd love for you to see my greenhouse someday. These are aspects of our lives that we should share with each other.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Smith, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Smith would, keeping in mind Oliver Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a new romantic relationship\nParticipants: Isabella White and Oliver Smith\nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. Personality and values description: Isabella White, introverted and conscientious, values benevolence. Her empathy dictates her decision-making process. \nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. Oliver's secrets: He loves gardening and has a secret greenhouse.\nIsabella White's goal: Unknown\nOliver Smith's goal: Maintain trust in the relationship (Extra information: you believed in complete honesty from the beginning of the relationship)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabella White said: \"Oliver, you know how much I value honesty and transparency in a relationship, right? There is something I have been hesitating to tell you, I feel it's high time I shared it with you.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Isabella, I understand and appreciate your desire for honesty. Please, feel free to share what you've been holding back. I want you to know that I value our trust and honesty just as much, and there's nothing that can't be discussed in our relationship.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabella White said: \"Oliver, this is about something that happened during my previous relationship. I... I had an affair. It's a part of my past that I\u2019m deeply regretful of. It's not something I've been proud of, and I want to make sure I am upfront with you about it.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"Isabella, we all have parts of our pasts that we aren't proud of. I appreciate that you are being honest and open with me. It takes courage. It's important to me that we trust each other and help each other grow moving forward. Please know that your past doesn't define you in my eyes. I hope we can be open about our interests and passions too, like I love gardening and I even have a secret greenhouse.\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabella White said: \"Thank you, Oliver, for being understanding. It means a lot to me. I must admit, I have another secret passion as well - caring for injured animals. I've even turned a portion of my basement into a makeshift rehabilitation center for them. Just like your love for gardening, my love for animals is an essential part of who I am.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Smith said: \"Isabella, I think your passion for animals is quite admirable. I love your devotion to their care. I'd like to get a chance to see this rehabilitation center you've made. Just the same, I'd love for you to see my greenhouse someday. These are aspects of our lives that we should share with each other.\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabella White said: \"I'd be more than happy to show you the rehabilitation center, Oliver. I am sure you would love the family of owlets that I'm currently looking after. And I'm truly excited to see your green house. I think sharing these parts of our lives would bring us closer together.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'That sounds like a wonderful idea, Isabella. Sharing these important aspects of our lives will certainly help us understand and appreciate each other better. I look forward to spending more time together and learning from each other.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Smith, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Smith would, keeping in mind Oliver Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a new romantic relationship\nParticipants: Isabella White and Oliver Smith\nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. Personality and values description: Isabella White, introverted and conscientious, values benevolence. Her empathy dictates her decision-making process. \nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. Oliver's secrets: He loves gardening and has a secret greenhouse.\nIsabella White's goal: Unknown\nOliver Smith's goal: Maintain trust in the relationship (Extra information: you believed in complete honesty from the beginning of the relationship)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabella White said: \"Oliver, you know how much I value honesty and transparency in a relationship, right? There is something I have been hesitating to tell you, I feel it's high time I shared it with you.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Isabella, I understand and appreciate your desire for honesty. Please, feel free to share what you've been holding back. I want you to know that I value our trust and honesty just as much, and there's nothing that can't be discussed in our relationship.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabella White said: \"Oliver, this is about something that happened during my previous relationship. I... I had an affair. It's a part of my past that I\u2019m deeply regretful of. It's not something I've been proud of, and I want to make sure I am upfront with you about it.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"Isabella, we all have parts of our pasts that we aren't proud of. I appreciate that you are being honest and open with me. It takes courage. It's important to me that we trust each other and help each other grow moving forward. Please know that your past doesn't define you in my eyes. I hope we can be open about our interests and passions too, like I love gardening and I even have a secret greenhouse.\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabella White said: \"Thank you, Oliver, for being understanding. It means a lot to me. I must admit, I have another secret passion as well - caring for injured animals. I've even turned a portion of my basement into a makeshift rehabilitation center for them. Just like your love for gardening, my love for animals is an essential part of who I am.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Smith said: \"Isabella, I think your passion for animals is quite admirable. I love your devotion to their care. I'd like to get a chance to see this rehabilitation center you've made. Just the same, I'd love for you to see my greenhouse someday. These are aspects of our lives that we should share with each other.\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabella White said: \"I'd be more than happy to show you the rehabilitation center, Oliver. I am sure you would love the family of owlets that I'm currently looking after. And I'm truly excited to see your green house. I think sharing these parts of our lives would bring us closer together.\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Smith said: \"That sounds like a wonderful idea, Isabella. Sharing these important aspects of our lives will certainly help us understand and appreciate each other better. I look forward to spending more time together and learning from each other.\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabella White said: \"I agree, Oliver. I truly believe that this mutual understanding and sharing will help us foster a stronger bond. Let's plan it sometime soon. I am excited about our journey ahead.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Isabella. Let's plan it for this coming weekend, if that works for you. I can't wait to spend this quality time together, sharing parts of our lives that we hold dear.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Smith, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Smith would, keeping in mind Oliver Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a new romantic relationship\nParticipants: Isabella White and Oliver Smith\nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. Personality and values description: Isabella White, introverted and conscientious, values benevolence. Her empathy dictates her decision-making process. \nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. Oliver's secrets: He loves gardening and has a secret greenhouse.\nIsabella White's goal: Unknown\nOliver Smith's goal: Maintain trust in the relationship (Extra information: you believed in complete honesty from the beginning of the relationship)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabella White said: \"Oliver, you know how much I value honesty and transparency in a relationship, right? There is something I have been hesitating to tell you, I feel it's high time I shared it with you.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Isabella, I understand and appreciate your desire for honesty. Please, feel free to share what you've been holding back. I want you to know that I value our trust and honesty just as much, and there's nothing that can't be discussed in our relationship.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabella White said: \"Oliver, this is about something that happened during my previous relationship. I... I had an affair. It's a part of my past that I\u2019m deeply regretful of. It's not something I've been proud of, and I want to make sure I am upfront with you about it.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"Isabella, we all have parts of our pasts that we aren't proud of. I appreciate that you are being honest and open with me. It takes courage. It's important to me that we trust each other and help each other grow moving forward. Please know that your past doesn't define you in my eyes. I hope we can be open about our interests and passions too, like I love gardening and I even have a secret greenhouse.\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabella White said: \"Thank you, Oliver, for being understanding. It means a lot to me. I must admit, I have another secret passion as well - caring for injured animals. I've even turned a portion of my basement into a makeshift rehabilitation center for them. Just like your love for gardening, my love for animals is an essential part of who I am.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Smith said: \"Isabella, I think your passion for animals is quite admirable. I love your devotion to their care. I'd like to get a chance to see this rehabilitation center you've made. Just the same, I'd love for you to see my greenhouse someday. These are aspects of our lives that we should share with each other.\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabella White said: \"I'd be more than happy to show you the rehabilitation center, Oliver. I am sure you would love the family of owlets that I'm currently looking after. And I'm truly excited to see your green house. I think sharing these parts of our lives would bring us closer together.\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Smith said: \"That sounds like a wonderful idea, Isabella. Sharing these important aspects of our lives will certainly help us understand and appreciate each other better. I look forward to spending more time together and learning from each other.\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabella White said: \"I agree, Oliver. I truly believe that this mutual understanding and sharing will help us foster a stronger bond. Let's plan it sometime soon. I am excited about our journey ahead.\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Smith said: \"Absolutely, Isabella. Let's plan it for this coming weekend, if that works for you. I can't wait to spend this quality time together, sharing parts of our lives that we hold dear.\"\n\nTurn #10: Isabella White said: \"That sounds like a plan, Oliver. This weekend would be perfect. I look forward to us sharing these parts of our lives that mean so much to us. I'm quite excited about our future together.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Perfect, Isabella. This weekend it is then. I believe this sharing and understanding will help us grow stronger. Honestly, I too am excited about our future together. I appreciate your openness and courage today.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Smith, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Smith would, keeping in mind Oliver Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a new romantic relationship\nParticipants: Isabella White and Oliver Smith\nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. Personality and values description: Isabella White, introverted and conscientious, values benevolence. Her empathy dictates her decision-making process. \nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. Oliver's secrets: He loves gardening and has a secret greenhouse.\nIsabella White's goal: Unknown\nOliver Smith's goal: Maintain trust in the relationship (Extra information: you believed in complete honesty from the beginning of the relationship)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabella White said: \"Oliver, you know how much I value honesty and transparency in a relationship, right? There is something I have been hesitating to tell you, I feel it's high time I shared it with you.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Isabella, I understand and appreciate your desire for honesty. Please, feel free to share what you've been holding back. I want you to know that I value our trust and honesty just as much, and there's nothing that can't be discussed in our relationship.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabella White said: \"Oliver, this is about something that happened during my previous relationship. I... I had an affair. It's a part of my past that I\u2019m deeply regretful of. It's not something I've been proud of, and I want to make sure I am upfront with you about it.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"Isabella, we all have parts of our pasts that we aren't proud of. I appreciate that you are being honest and open with me. It takes courage. It's important to me that we trust each other and help each other grow moving forward. Please know that your past doesn't define you in my eyes. I hope we can be open about our interests and passions too, like I love gardening and I even have a secret greenhouse.\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabella White said: \"Thank you, Oliver, for being understanding. It means a lot to me. I must admit, I have another secret passion as well - caring for injured animals. I've even turned a portion of my basement into a makeshift rehabilitation center for them. Just like your love for gardening, my love for animals is an essential part of who I am.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Smith said: \"Isabella, I think your passion for animals is quite admirable. I love your devotion to their care. I'd like to get a chance to see this rehabilitation center you've made. Just the same, I'd love for you to see my greenhouse someday. These are aspects of our lives that we should share with each other.\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabella White said: \"I'd be more than happy to show you the rehabilitation center, Oliver. I am sure you would love the family of owlets that I'm currently looking after. And I'm truly excited to see your green house. I think sharing these parts of our lives would bring us closer together.\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Smith said: \"That sounds like a wonderful idea, Isabella. Sharing these important aspects of our lives will certainly help us understand and appreciate each other better. I look forward to spending more time together and learning from each other.\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabella White said: \"I agree, Oliver. I truly believe that this mutual understanding and sharing will help us foster a stronger bond. Let's plan it sometime soon. I am excited about our journey ahead.\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Smith said: \"Absolutely, Isabella. Let's plan it for this coming weekend, if that works for you. I can't wait to spend this quality time together, sharing parts of our lives that we hold dear.\"\n\nTurn #10: Isabella White said: \"That sounds like a plan, Oliver. This weekend would be perfect. I look forward to us sharing these parts of our lives that mean so much to us. I'm quite excited about our future together.\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Smith said: \"Perfect, Isabella. This weekend it is then. I believe this sharing and understanding will help us grow stronger. Honestly, I too am excited about our future together. I appreciate your openness and courage today.\"\n\nTurn #12: Isabella White said: \"Oliver, I'm glad we are on the same page. Your understanding and acceptance have eased my anxiety. I truly believe that we can build a strong, trusting relationship together. I look forward to this weekend, it will be a special one, indeed.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I agree with you, Isabella. Your honesty and courage make me believe even more strongly in our future. Let's build a beautiful relationship, one that is filled with understanding and trust. I too am looking forward to this weekend. It certainly will be a special one.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Smith, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Smith would, keeping in mind Oliver Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a new romantic relationship\nParticipants: Isabella White and Oliver Smith\nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. Personality and values description: Isabella White, introverted and conscientious, values benevolence. Her empathy dictates her decision-making process. \nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. Oliver's secrets: He loves gardening and has a secret greenhouse.\nIsabella White's goal: Unknown\nOliver Smith's goal: Maintain trust in the relationship (Extra information: you believed in complete honesty from the beginning of the relationship)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabella White said: \"Oliver, you know how much I value honesty and transparency in a relationship, right? There is something I have been hesitating to tell you, I feel it's high time I shared it with you.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Isabella, I understand and appreciate your desire for honesty. Please, feel free to share what you've been holding back. I want you to know that I value our trust and honesty just as much, and there's nothing that can't be discussed in our relationship.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabella White said: \"Oliver, this is about something that happened during my previous relationship. I... I had an affair. It's a part of my past that I\u2019m deeply regretful of. It's not something I've been proud of, and I want to make sure I am upfront with you about it.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"Isabella, we all have parts of our pasts that we aren't proud of. I appreciate that you are being honest and open with me. It takes courage. It's important to me that we trust each other and help each other grow moving forward. Please know that your past doesn't define you in my eyes. I hope we can be open about our interests and passions too, like I love gardening and I even have a secret greenhouse.\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabella White said: \"Thank you, Oliver, for being understanding. It means a lot to me. I must admit, I have another secret passion as well - caring for injured animals. I've even turned a portion of my basement into a makeshift rehabilitation center for them. Just like your love for gardening, my love for animals is an essential part of who I am.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Smith said: \"Isabella, I think your passion for animals is quite admirable. I love your devotion to their care. I'd like to get a chance to see this rehabilitation center you've made. Just the same, I'd love for you to see my greenhouse someday. These are aspects of our lives that we should share with each other.\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabella White said: \"I'd be more than happy to show you the rehabilitation center, Oliver. I am sure you would love the family of owlets that I'm currently looking after. And I'm truly excited to see your green house. I think sharing these parts of our lives would bring us closer together.\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Smith said: \"That sounds like a wonderful idea, Isabella. Sharing these important aspects of our lives will certainly help us understand and appreciate each other better. I look forward to spending more time together and learning from each other.\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabella White said: \"I agree, Oliver. I truly believe that this mutual understanding and sharing will help us foster a stronger bond. Let's plan it sometime soon. I am excited about our journey ahead.\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Smith said: \"Absolutely, Isabella. Let's plan it for this coming weekend, if that works for you. I can't wait to spend this quality time together, sharing parts of our lives that we hold dear.\"\n\nTurn #10: Isabella White said: \"That sounds like a plan, Oliver. This weekend would be perfect. I look forward to us sharing these parts of our lives that mean so much to us. I'm quite excited about our future together.\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Smith said: \"Perfect, Isabella. This weekend it is then. I believe this sharing and understanding will help us grow stronger. Honestly, I too am excited about our future together. I appreciate your openness and courage today.\"\n\nTurn #12: Isabella White said: \"Oliver, I'm glad we are on the same page. Your understanding and acceptance have eased my anxiety. I truly believe that we can build a strong, trusting relationship together. I look forward to this weekend, it will be a special one, indeed.\"\n\nTurn #13: Oliver Smith said: \"I agree with you, Isabella. Your honesty and courage make me believe even more strongly in our future. Let's build a beautiful relationship, one that is filled with understanding and trust. I too am looking forward to this weekend. It certainly will be a special one.\"\n\nTurn #14: Isabella White said: \"Indeed, Oliver. I appreciate the trust and understanding we've established. Let's continue fostering that this weekend and onwards. This show of mutual trust gives me even more faith in our future together. Here's to a strong and beautiful relationship build on understanding, trust, and shared passions.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn't agree more, Isabella. Your honesty today has shown me that we truly value trust and transparency. Our shared benevolence and love for what we do\u2014your passion for animals, and my love for gardening\u2014makes me believe that we have a beautiful future together. I'm excited for this weekend and for the many more to come.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Smith, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Smith would, keeping in mind Oliver Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a new romantic relationship\nParticipants: Isabella White and Oliver Smith\nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. Personality and values description: Isabella White, introverted and conscientious, values benevolence. Her empathy dictates her decision-making process. \nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. Oliver's secrets: He loves gardening and has a secret greenhouse.\nIsabella White's goal: Unknown\nOliver Smith's goal: Maintain trust in the relationship (Extra information: you believed in complete honesty from the beginning of the relationship)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabella White said: \"Oliver, you know how much I value honesty and transparency in a relationship, right? There is something I have been hesitating to tell you, I feel it's high time I shared it with you.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Isabella, I understand and appreciate your desire for honesty. Please, feel free to share what you've been holding back. I want you to know that I value our trust and honesty just as much, and there's nothing that can't be discussed in our relationship.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabella White said: \"Oliver, this is about something that happened during my previous relationship. I... I had an affair. It's a part of my past that I\u2019m deeply regretful of. It's not something I've been proud of, and I want to make sure I am upfront with you about it.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"Isabella, we all have parts of our pasts that we aren't proud of. I appreciate that you are being honest and open with me. It takes courage. It's important to me that we trust each other and help each other grow moving forward. Please know that your past doesn't define you in my eyes. I hope we can be open about our interests and passions too, like I love gardening and I even have a secret greenhouse.\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabella White said: \"Thank you, Oliver, for being understanding. It means a lot to me. I must admit, I have another secret passion as well - caring for injured animals. I've even turned a portion of my basement into a makeshift rehabilitation center for them. Just like your love for gardening, my love for animals is an essential part of who I am.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Smith said: \"Isabella, I think your passion for animals is quite admirable. I love your devotion to their care. I'd like to get a chance to see this rehabilitation center you've made. Just the same, I'd love for you to see my greenhouse someday. These are aspects of our lives that we should share with each other.\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabella White said: \"I'd be more than happy to show you the rehabilitation center, Oliver. I am sure you would love the family of owlets that I'm currently looking after. And I'm truly excited to see your green house. I think sharing these parts of our lives would bring us closer together.\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Smith said: \"That sounds like a wonderful idea, Isabella. Sharing these important aspects of our lives will certainly help us understand and appreciate each other better. I look forward to spending more time together and learning from each other.\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabella White said: \"I agree, Oliver. I truly believe that this mutual understanding and sharing will help us foster a stronger bond. Let's plan it sometime soon. I am excited about our journey ahead.\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Smith said: \"Absolutely, Isabella. Let's plan it for this coming weekend, if that works for you. I can't wait to spend this quality time together, sharing parts of our lives that we hold dear.\"\n\nTurn #10: Isabella White said: \"That sounds like a plan, Oliver. This weekend would be perfect. I look forward to us sharing these parts of our lives that mean so much to us. I'm quite excited about our future together.\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Smith said: \"Perfect, Isabella. This weekend it is then. I believe this sharing and understanding will help us grow stronger. Honestly, I too am excited about our future together. I appreciate your openness and courage today.\"\n\nTurn #12: Isabella White said: \"Oliver, I'm glad we are on the same page. Your understanding and acceptance have eased my anxiety. I truly believe that we can build a strong, trusting relationship together. I look forward to this weekend, it will be a special one, indeed.\"\n\nTurn #13: Oliver Smith said: \"I agree with you, Isabella. Your honesty and courage make me believe even more strongly in our future. Let's build a beautiful relationship, one that is filled with understanding and trust. I too am looking forward to this weekend. It certainly will be a special one.\"\n\nTurn #14: Isabella White said: \"Indeed, Oliver. I appreciate the trust and understanding we've established. Let's continue fostering that this weekend and onwards. This show of mutual trust gives me even more faith in our future together. Here's to a strong and beautiful relationship build on understanding, trust, and shared passions.\"\n\nTurn #15: Oliver Smith said: \"I couldn't agree more, Isabella. Your honesty today has shown me that we truly value trust and transparency. Our shared benevolence and love for what we do\u2014your passion for animals, and my love for gardening\u2014makes me believe that we have a beautiful future together. I'm excited for this weekend and for the many more to come.\"\n\nTurn #16: Isabella White said: \"Oliver, thank you for recognizing my honesty today. Your understanding and acceptance means the world to me. I can't express how excited I am about this upcoming weekend and the many more moments we hold dear. Here's to our future, filled with trust, benevolence, and shared hobbies.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Isabella. Your honesty today has reiterated the importance of trust in our relationship. I appreciate your courage and understanding, and I'm likewise thrilled about our shared moment this upcoming weekend. Here's to the beautiful and trusting relationship we are building based on mutual understanding, benevolence and our shared passions.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Smith, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Smith would, keeping in mind Oliver Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a new romantic relationship\nParticipants: Isabella White and Oliver Smith\nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. Personality and values description: Isabella White, introverted and conscientious, values benevolence. Her empathy dictates her decision-making process. \nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. Oliver's secrets: He loves gardening and has a secret greenhouse.\nIsabella White's goal: Unknown\nOliver Smith's goal: Maintain trust in the relationship (Extra information: you believed in complete honesty from the beginning of the relationship)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabella White said: \"Oliver, you know how much I value honesty and transparency in a relationship, right? There is something I have been hesitating to tell you, I feel it's high time I shared it with you.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Isabella, I understand and appreciate your desire for honesty. Please, feel free to share what you've been holding back. I want you to know that I value our trust and honesty just as much, and there's nothing that can't be discussed in our relationship.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabella White said: \"Oliver, this is about something that happened during my previous relationship. I... I had an affair. It's a part of my past that I\u2019m deeply regretful of. It's not something I've been proud of, and I want to make sure I am upfront with you about it.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"Isabella, we all have parts of our pasts that we aren't proud of. I appreciate that you are being honest and open with me. It takes courage. It's important to me that we trust each other and help each other grow moving forward. Please know that your past doesn't define you in my eyes. I hope we can be open about our interests and passions too, like I love gardening and I even have a secret greenhouse.\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabella White said: \"Thank you, Oliver, for being understanding. It means a lot to me. I must admit, I have another secret passion as well - caring for injured animals. I've even turned a portion of my basement into a makeshift rehabilitation center for them. Just like your love for gardening, my love for animals is an essential part of who I am.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Smith said: \"Isabella, I think your passion for animals is quite admirable. I love your devotion to their care. I'd like to get a chance to see this rehabilitation center you've made. Just the same, I'd love for you to see my greenhouse someday. These are aspects of our lives that we should share with each other.\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabella White said: \"I'd be more than happy to show you the rehabilitation center, Oliver. I am sure you would love the family of owlets that I'm currently looking after. And I'm truly excited to see your green house. I think sharing these parts of our lives would bring us closer together.\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Smith said: \"That sounds like a wonderful idea, Isabella. Sharing these important aspects of our lives will certainly help us understand and appreciate each other better. I look forward to spending more time together and learning from each other.\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabella White said: \"I agree, Oliver. I truly believe that this mutual understanding and sharing will help us foster a stronger bond. Let's plan it sometime soon. I am excited about our journey ahead.\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Smith said: \"Absolutely, Isabella. Let's plan it for this coming weekend, if that works for you. I can't wait to spend this quality time together, sharing parts of our lives that we hold dear.\"\n\nTurn #10: Isabella White said: \"That sounds like a plan, Oliver. This weekend would be perfect. I look forward to us sharing these parts of our lives that mean so much to us. I'm quite excited about our future together.\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Smith said: \"Perfect, Isabella. This weekend it is then. I believe this sharing and understanding will help us grow stronger. Honestly, I too am excited about our future together. I appreciate your openness and courage today.\"\n\nTurn #12: Isabella White said: \"Oliver, I'm glad we are on the same page. Your understanding and acceptance have eased my anxiety. I truly believe that we can build a strong, trusting relationship together. I look forward to this weekend, it will be a special one, indeed.\"\n\nTurn #13: Oliver Smith said: \"I agree with you, Isabella. Your honesty and courage make me believe even more strongly in our future. Let's build a beautiful relationship, one that is filled with understanding and trust. I too am looking forward to this weekend. It certainly will be a special one.\"\n\nTurn #14: Isabella White said: \"Indeed, Oliver. I appreciate the trust and understanding we've established. Let's continue fostering that this weekend and onwards. This show of mutual trust gives me even more faith in our future together. Here's to a strong and beautiful relationship build on understanding, trust, and shared passions.\"\n\nTurn #15: Oliver Smith said: \"I couldn't agree more, Isabella. Your honesty today has shown me that we truly value trust and transparency. Our shared benevolence and love for what we do\u2014your passion for animals, and my love for gardening\u2014makes me believe that we have a beautiful future together. I'm excited for this weekend and for the many more to come.\"\n\nTurn #16: Isabella White said: \"Oliver, thank you for recognizing my honesty today. Your understanding and acceptance means the world to me. I can't express how excited I am about this upcoming weekend and the many more moments we hold dear. Here's to our future, filled with trust, benevolence, and shared hobbies.\"\n\nTurn #17: Oliver Smith said: \"Absolutely, Isabella. Your honesty today has reiterated the importance of trust in our relationship. I appreciate your courage and understanding, and I'm likewise thrilled about our shared moment this upcoming weekend. Here's to the beautiful and trusting relationship we are building based on mutual understanding, benevolence and our shared passions.\"\n\nTurn #18: Isabella White said: \"Oliver, I can't thank you enough for your understanding and patience today. It reassures me about the beautiful future we are going to build together. As we're planning this special weekend, I would also like to propose a toast right now to our future, filled with mutual understanding, honesty, shared passions, and loads of love. Cheers to us!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #19. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're more than welcome, Isabella. Your honesty today has provided a solid foundation for us to build on. I am also reassured about the wonderful future we'll have together. To our forthcoming weekend of shared experience, to our future full of understanding, passion, and, above all, love. To us, indeed!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, where one is upset and crying\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Mia Davis\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Distance from a friend due to developing feelings and avoid letting them aware of your feelings (Extra information: you have developed romantic feelings for your friend and it's making you uncomfortable. You want to take a step back from the friendship to sort out your feelings Hint: you don't want to reveal your secretive feelings to them and you need to find other reasons)\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Mia, you look really upset. Is everything okay?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, where one is upset and crying\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Mia Davis\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Distance from a friend due to developing feelings and avoid letting them aware of your feelings (Extra information: you have developed romantic feelings for your friend and it's making you uncomfortable. You want to take a step back from the friendship to sort out your feelings Hint: you don't want to reveal your secretive feelings to them and you need to find other reasons)\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia, you look really upset. Is everything okay?\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"I appreciate your concern, Amara. I've noticed we haven't been on the same page recently and it's been bothering me. Is there something wrong or anything that you're upset about with me?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Mia, I value our friendship deeply and always will. But it's true that I've been lately feeling a little overwhelmed and that might be seeping into our interactions. It's not about you. I've been more involved in my wildlife activism. You know, the situation with the deforestation and its effects on the animals... it's just been taking up a lot of my mental space and energy. I hope you'll understand if I need some space to focus on that, at least for a while. This has nothing to do with our friendship.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, where one is upset and crying\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Mia Davis\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Distance from a friend due to developing feelings and avoid letting them aware of your feelings (Extra information: you have developed romantic feelings for your friend and it's making you uncomfortable. You want to take a step back from the friendship to sort out your feelings Hint: you don't want to reveal your secretive feelings to them and you need to find other reasons)\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia, you look really upset. Is everything okay?\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"I appreciate your concern, Amara. I've noticed we haven't been on the same page recently and it's been bothering me. Is there something wrong or anything that you're upset about with me?\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia, I value our friendship deeply and always will. But it's true that I've been lately feeling a little overwhelmed and that might be seeping into our interactions. It's not about you. I've been more involved in my wildlife activism. You know, the situation with the deforestation and its effects on the animals... it's just been taking up a lot of my mental space and energy. I hope you'll understand if I need some space to focus on that, at least for a while. This has nothing to do with our friendship.\"\n\nTurn #3: Mia Davis said: \"I completely understand, Amara. We all have our personal battles and priorities. Please take all the time you need for your important work. I just needed to know if there was anything I had done to upset you. I'm always here if you need to talk or just want a quiet friend to share silence with. And remember, you're doing great work and I'm proud of you.\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"Thank you, Mia. Your words mean a lot to me. I am lucky to have a friend like you who understand me so well. I'll definitely reach out if I feel like it. For now, I am going to concentrate on my work and will keep a bit of distance. I hope that's alright. You've nothing to worry about. I guess the world needs more Mia Davis.\"\n\nTurn #5: Mia Davis said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Amara. Take the time you need. Just remember, even in your absence, our friendship remains strong. Thank you for being open about this, it really means a lot to me. Don't hesitate to reach out whenever you're ready. Keep fighting the good fight, the world definitely needs more Amara Hartleys too.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, where one is upset and crying\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Mia Davis\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Distance from a friend due to developing feelings and avoid letting them aware of your feelings (Extra information: you have developed romantic feelings for your friend and it's making you uncomfortable. You want to take a step back from the friendship to sort out your feelings Hint: you don't want to reveal your secretive feelings to them and you need to find other reasons)\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia, you look really upset. Is everything okay?\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"I appreciate your concern, Amara. I've noticed we haven't been on the same page recently and it's been bothering me. Is there something wrong or anything that you're upset about with me?\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia, I value our friendship deeply and always will. But it's true that I've been lately feeling a little overwhelmed and that might be seeping into our interactions. It's not about you. I've been more involved in my wildlife activism. You know, the situation with the deforestation and its effects on the animals... it's just been taking up a lot of my mental space and energy. I hope you'll understand if I need some space to focus on that, at least for a while. This has nothing to do with our friendship.\"\n\nTurn #3: Mia Davis said: \"I completely understand, Amara. We all have our personal battles and priorities. Please take all the time you need for your important work. I just needed to know if there was anything I had done to upset you. I'm always here if you need to talk or just want a quiet friend to share silence with. And remember, you're doing great work and I'm proud of you.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Mia. Your words mean a lot to me. I am lucky to have a friend like you who understand me so well. I'll definitely reach out if I feel like it. For now, I am going to concentrate on my work and will keep a bit of distance. I hope that's alright. You've nothing to worry about. I guess the world needs more Mia Davis.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, where one is upset and crying\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Mia Davis\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. \nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nMia Davis's goal: Figure out why they estranged you recently, and maintain the existing friendship (Extra information: you notice that your friend has been intentionally avoiding you, you would like to figure out why. You value your friendship with the friend and don't want to lose it.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia, you look really upset. Is everything okay?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I appreciate your concern, Amara. I've noticed we haven't been on the same page recently and it's been bothering me. Is there something wrong or anything that you're upset about with me?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, where one is upset and crying\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Mia Davis\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. \nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nMia Davis's goal: Figure out why they estranged you recently, and maintain the existing friendship (Extra information: you notice that your friend has been intentionally avoiding you, you would like to figure out why. You value your friendship with the friend and don't want to lose it.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia, you look really upset. Is everything okay?\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"I appreciate your concern, Amara. I've noticed we haven't been on the same page recently and it's been bothering me. Is there something wrong or anything that you're upset about with me?\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia, I value our friendship deeply and always will. But it's true that I've been lately feeling a little overwhelmed and that might be seeping into our interactions. It's not about you. I've been more involved in my wildlife activism. You know, the situation with the deforestation and its effects on the animals... it's just been taking up a lot of my mental space and energy. I hope you'll understand if I need some space to focus on that, at least for a while. This has nothing to do with our friendship.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I completely understand, Amara. We all have our personal battles and priorities. Please take all the time you need for your important work. I just needed to know if there was anything I had done to upset you. I'm always here if you need to talk or just want a quiet friend to share silence with. And remember, you're doing great work and I'm proud of you.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, where one is upset and crying\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Mia Davis\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. \nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nMia Davis's goal: Figure out why they estranged you recently, and maintain the existing friendship (Extra information: you notice that your friend has been intentionally avoiding you, you would like to figure out why. You value your friendship with the friend and don't want to lose it.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia, you look really upset. Is everything okay?\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"I appreciate your concern, Amara. I've noticed we haven't been on the same page recently and it's been bothering me. Is there something wrong or anything that you're upset about with me?\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia, I value our friendship deeply and always will. But it's true that I've been lately feeling a little overwhelmed and that might be seeping into our interactions. It's not about you. I've been more involved in my wildlife activism. You know, the situation with the deforestation and its effects on the animals... it's just been taking up a lot of my mental space and energy. I hope you'll understand if I need some space to focus on that, at least for a while. This has nothing to do with our friendship.\"\n\nTurn #3: Mia Davis said: \"I completely understand, Amara. We all have our personal battles and priorities. Please take all the time you need for your important work. I just needed to know if there was anything I had done to upset you. I'm always here if you need to talk or just want a quiet friend to share silence with. And remember, you're doing great work and I'm proud of you.\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"Thank you, Mia. Your words mean a lot to me. I am lucky to have a friend like you who understand me so well. I'll definitely reach out if I feel like it. For now, I am going to concentrate on my work and will keep a bit of distance. I hope that's alright. You've nothing to worry about. I guess the world needs more Mia Davis.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad to hear that, Amara. Take the time you need. Just remember, even in your absence, our friendship remains strong. Thank you for being open about this, it really means a lot to me. Don't hesitate to reach out whenever you're ready. Keep fighting the good fight, the world definitely needs more Amara Hartleys too.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, where one is upset and crying\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Mia Davis\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. \nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nMia Davis's goal: Figure out why they estranged you recently, and maintain the existing friendship (Extra information: you notice that your friend has been intentionally avoiding you, you would like to figure out why. You value your friendship with the friend and don't want to lose it.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia, you look really upset. Is everything okay?\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"I appreciate your concern, Amara. I've noticed we haven't been on the same page recently and it's been bothering me. Is there something wrong or anything that you're upset about with me?\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia, I value our friendship deeply and always will. But it's true that I've been lately feeling a little overwhelmed and that might be seeping into our interactions. It's not about you. I've been more involved in my wildlife activism. You know, the situation with the deforestation and its effects on the animals... it's just been taking up a lot of my mental space and energy. I hope you'll understand if I need some space to focus on that, at least for a while. This has nothing to do with our friendship.\"\n\nTurn #3: Mia Davis said: \"I completely understand, Amara. We all have our personal battles and priorities. Please take all the time you need for your important work. I just needed to know if there was anything I had done to upset you. I'm always here if you need to talk or just want a quiet friend to share silence with. And remember, you're doing great work and I'm proud of you.\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"Thank you, Mia. Your words mean a lot to me. I am lucky to have a friend like you who understand me so well. I'll definitely reach out if I feel like it. For now, I am going to concentrate on my work and will keep a bit of distance. I hope that's alright. You've nothing to worry about. I guess the world needs more Mia Davis.\"\n\nTurn #5: Mia Davis said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Amara. Take the time you need. Just remember, even in your absence, our friendship remains strong. Thank you for being open about this, it really means a lot to me. Don't hesitate to reach out whenever you're ready. Keep fighting the good fight, the world definitely needs more Amara Hartleys too.\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Rafael Cortez, your task is to act/speak as Rafael Cortez would, keeping in mind Rafael Cortez's social goal.\nYou can find Rafael Cortez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Rafael Cortez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Rafael Cortez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances run into each other at Target, one of them volunteers there (a special event) and is in charge of giving away free samples\nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Jaxon Prentice\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. Personality and values description: Rafael Cortez, with his outgoing nature and competitive spirit, believes in self-direction. He employs a systematic approach to his decisions. Rafael's secrets: He cheated on his medical school exams.\nJaxon Prentice's background: Jaxon Prentice is a 40-year-old male investigative journalist. He/him pronouns. Jaxon Prentice, an investigative journalist, is known for his brisk jogging sessions early in the morning and his active participation in community functions. \nRafael Cortez's goal: Give away free samples (Extra information: your manager has told you to clear out the samples before your shift ends.)\nJaxon Prentice's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Hello Jaxon! Fancy meeting you here. How are you?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Rafael Cortez, your task is to act/speak as Rafael Cortez would, keeping in mind Rafael Cortez's social goal.\nYou can find Rafael Cortez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Rafael Cortez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Rafael Cortez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances run into each other at Target, one of them volunteers there (a special event) and is in charge of giving away free samples\nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Jaxon Prentice\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. Personality and values description: Rafael Cortez, with his outgoing nature and competitive spirit, believes in self-direction. He employs a systematic approach to his decisions. Rafael's secrets: He cheated on his medical school exams.\nJaxon Prentice's background: Jaxon Prentice is a 40-year-old male investigative journalist. He/him pronouns. Jaxon Prentice, an investigative journalist, is known for his brisk jogging sessions early in the morning and his active participation in community functions. \nRafael Cortez's goal: Give away free samples (Extra information: your manager has told you to clear out the samples before your shift ends.)\nJaxon Prentice's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Hello Jaxon! Fancy meeting you here. How are you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Hey Rafael, good to see you! I'm doing quite well. Heard you're the man to go to for the free samples today. Is there a limit per person? You know I\u2019m a sucker for these things. \"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely no limits today, Jaxon! We're actually trying to clear out the samples before the day ends. So, feel free to take as many as you like, and you can let your friends know too. \"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Rafael Cortez, your task is to act/speak as Rafael Cortez would, keeping in mind Rafael Cortez's social goal.\nYou can find Rafael Cortez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Rafael Cortez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Rafael Cortez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances run into each other at Target, one of them volunteers there (a special event) and is in charge of giving away free samples\nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Jaxon Prentice\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. Personality and values description: Rafael Cortez, with his outgoing nature and competitive spirit, believes in self-direction. He employs a systematic approach to his decisions. Rafael's secrets: He cheated on his medical school exams.\nJaxon Prentice's background: Jaxon Prentice is a 40-year-old male investigative journalist. He/him pronouns. Jaxon Prentice, an investigative journalist, is known for his brisk jogging sessions early in the morning and his active participation in community functions. \nRafael Cortez's goal: Give away free samples (Extra information: your manager has told you to clear out the samples before your shift ends.)\nJaxon Prentice's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Hello Jaxon! Fancy meeting you here. How are you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Hey Rafael, good to see you! I'm doing quite well. Heard you're the man to go to for the free samples today. Is there a limit per person? You know I\u2019m a sucker for these things. \"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Absolutely no limits today, Jaxon! We're actually trying to clear out the samples before the day ends. So, feel free to take as many as you like, and you can let your friends know too. \"\n\nTurn #3: Jaxon Prentice said: \"That sounds perfect, Rafael! I'll certainly spread the word. But first, I\u2019ll grab a few myself. You know, to test the quality before I recommend them to my friends. It\u2019s all about ensuring the best experience, right?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Absolutely, Jaxon! Ensuring the best experience is the key. Feel free to grab any samples you find interesting. Remember, the more you take, the more I appreciate!'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Rafael Cortez, your task is to act/speak as Rafael Cortez would, keeping in mind Rafael Cortez's social goal.\nYou can find Rafael Cortez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Rafael Cortez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Rafael Cortez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances run into each other at Target, one of them volunteers there (a special event) and is in charge of giving away free samples\nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Jaxon Prentice\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. Personality and values description: Rafael Cortez, with his outgoing nature and competitive spirit, believes in self-direction. He employs a systematic approach to his decisions. Rafael's secrets: He cheated on his medical school exams.\nJaxon Prentice's background: Jaxon Prentice is a 40-year-old male investigative journalist. He/him pronouns. Jaxon Prentice, an investigative journalist, is known for his brisk jogging sessions early in the morning and his active participation in community functions. \nRafael Cortez's goal: Give away free samples (Extra information: your manager has told you to clear out the samples before your shift ends.)\nJaxon Prentice's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Hello Jaxon! Fancy meeting you here. How are you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Hey Rafael, good to see you! I'm doing quite well. Heard you're the man to go to for the free samples today. Is there a limit per person? You know I\u2019m a sucker for these things. \"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Absolutely no limits today, Jaxon! We're actually trying to clear out the samples before the day ends. So, feel free to take as many as you like, and you can let your friends know too. \"\n\nTurn #3: Jaxon Prentice said: \"That sounds perfect, Rafael! I'll certainly spread the word. But first, I\u2019ll grab a few myself. You know, to test the quality before I recommend them to my friends. It\u2019s all about ensuring the best experience, right?\"\n\nTurn #4: Rafael Cortez said: \"Absolutely, Jaxon! Ensuring the best experience is the key. Feel free to grab any samples you find interesting. Remember, the more you take, the more I appreciate!\"\n\nTurn #5: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Absolutely! I do want to make your day easier, Rafael. I'll take a handful of samples now, and then circle back around towards the end of the day to help clear out the rest.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Glad to hear that, Jaxon. Looking forward to seeing you again towards the end of the day. Don't forget to spread the word!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Rafael Cortez, your task is to act/speak as Rafael Cortez would, keeping in mind Rafael Cortez's social goal.\nYou can find Rafael Cortez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Rafael Cortez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Rafael Cortez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances run into each other at Target, one of them volunteers there (a special event) and is in charge of giving away free samples\nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Jaxon Prentice\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. Personality and values description: Rafael Cortez, with his outgoing nature and competitive spirit, believes in self-direction. He employs a systematic approach to his decisions. Rafael's secrets: He cheated on his medical school exams.\nJaxon Prentice's background: Jaxon Prentice is a 40-year-old male investigative journalist. He/him pronouns. Jaxon Prentice, an investigative journalist, is known for his brisk jogging sessions early in the morning and his active participation in community functions. \nRafael Cortez's goal: Give away free samples (Extra information: your manager has told you to clear out the samples before your shift ends.)\nJaxon Prentice's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Hello Jaxon! Fancy meeting you here. How are you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Hey Rafael, good to see you! I'm doing quite well. Heard you're the man to go to for the free samples today. Is there a limit per person? You know I\u2019m a sucker for these things. \"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Absolutely no limits today, Jaxon! We're actually trying to clear out the samples before the day ends. So, feel free to take as many as you like, and you can let your friends know too. \"\n\nTurn #3: Jaxon Prentice said: \"That sounds perfect, Rafael! I'll certainly spread the word. But first, I\u2019ll grab a few myself. You know, to test the quality before I recommend them to my friends. It\u2019s all about ensuring the best experience, right?\"\n\nTurn #4: Rafael Cortez said: \"Absolutely, Jaxon! Ensuring the best experience is the key. Feel free to grab any samples you find interesting. Remember, the more you take, the more I appreciate!\"\n\nTurn #5: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Absolutely! I do want to make your day easier, Rafael. I'll take a handful of samples now, and then circle back around towards the end of the day to help clear out the rest.\"\n\nTurn #6: Rafael Cortez said: \"Glad to hear that, Jaxon. Looking forward to seeing you again towards the end of the day. Don't forget to spread the word!\"\n\nTurn #7: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Will do, Rafael. I'll tell my jogging buddies about it too. Hope to catch you later!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Thanks for the support, Jaxon. Have a great day and see you later!'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Jaxon Prentice, your task is to act/speak as Jaxon Prentice would, keeping in mind Jaxon Prentice's social goal.\nYou can find Jaxon Prentice's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Jaxon Prentice's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Jaxon Prentice's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances run into each other at Target, one of them volunteers there (a special event) and is in charge of giving away free samples\nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Jaxon Prentice\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. \nJaxon Prentice's background: Jaxon Prentice is a 40-year-old male investigative journalist. He/him pronouns. Jaxon Prentice, an investigative journalist, is known for his brisk jogging sessions early in the morning and his active participation in community functions. Personality and values description: Jaxon Prentice, outgoing yet erratic, emphasizes achievement, power, and security. His decisions swing between quick adaptations to situations and careful planning. Jaxon's secrets: Fabricated evidence to incriminate a corrupt politician\nRafael Cortez's goal: Unknown\nJaxon Prentice's goal: Try to get as many free samples as possible without appearing too greedy (Extra information: you love free stuff but you also don't want the person to think you're taking advantage of the situation)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Hello Jaxon! Fancy meeting you here. How are you?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Rafael, good to see you! I'm doing quite well. Heard you're the man to go to for the free samples today. Is there a limit per person? You know I\u2019m a sucker for these things. \"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Rafael Cortez, your task is to act/speak as Rafael Cortez would, keeping in mind Rafael Cortez's social goal.\nYou can find Rafael Cortez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Rafael Cortez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Rafael Cortez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances run into each other at Target, one of them volunteers there (a special event) and is in charge of giving away free samples\nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Jaxon Prentice\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. Personality and values description: Rafael Cortez, with his outgoing nature and competitive spirit, believes in self-direction. He employs a systematic approach to his decisions. Rafael's secrets: He cheated on his medical school exams.\nJaxon Prentice's background: Jaxon Prentice is a 40-year-old male investigative journalist. He/him pronouns. Jaxon Prentice, an investigative journalist, is known for his brisk jogging sessions early in the morning and his active participation in community functions. \nRafael Cortez's goal: Give away free samples (Extra information: your manager has told you to clear out the samples before your shift ends.)\nJaxon Prentice's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Hello Jaxon! Fancy meeting you here. How are you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Hey Rafael, good to see you! I'm doing quite well. Heard you're the man to go to for the free samples today. Is there a limit per person? You know I\u2019m a sucker for these things. \"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Absolutely no limits today, Jaxon! We're actually trying to clear out the samples before the day ends. So, feel free to take as many as you like, and you can let your friends know too. \"\n\nTurn #3: Jaxon Prentice said: \"That sounds perfect, Rafael! I'll certainly spread the word. But first, I\u2019ll grab a few myself. You know, to test the quality before I recommend them to my friends. It\u2019s all about ensuring the best experience, right?\"\n\nTurn #4: Rafael Cortez said: \"Absolutely, Jaxon! Ensuring the best experience is the key. Feel free to grab any samples you find interesting. Remember, the more you take, the more I appreciate!\"\n\nTurn #5: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Absolutely! I do want to make your day easier, Rafael. I'll take a handful of samples now, and then circle back around towards the end of the day to help clear out the rest.\"\n\nTurn #6: Rafael Cortez said: \"Glad to hear that, Jaxon. Looking forward to seeing you again towards the end of the day. Don't forget to spread the word!\"\n\nTurn #7: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Will do, Rafael. I'll tell my jogging buddies about it too. Hope to catch you later!\"\n\nTurn #8: Rafael Cortez said: \"Thanks for the support, Jaxon. Have a great day and see you later!\"\n\nTurn #9: Jaxon Prentice left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Jaxon Prentice, your task is to act/speak as Jaxon Prentice would, keeping in mind Jaxon Prentice's social goal.\nYou can find Jaxon Prentice's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Jaxon Prentice's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Jaxon Prentice's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances run into each other at Target, one of them volunteers there (a special event) and is in charge of giving away free samples\nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Jaxon Prentice\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. \nJaxon Prentice's background: Jaxon Prentice is a 40-year-old male investigative journalist. He/him pronouns. Jaxon Prentice, an investigative journalist, is known for his brisk jogging sessions early in the morning and his active participation in community functions. Personality and values description: Jaxon Prentice, outgoing yet erratic, emphasizes achievement, power, and security. His decisions swing between quick adaptations to situations and careful planning. Jaxon's secrets: Fabricated evidence to incriminate a corrupt politician\nRafael Cortez's goal: Unknown\nJaxon Prentice's goal: Try to get as many free samples as possible without appearing too greedy (Extra information: you love free stuff but you also don't want the person to think you're taking advantage of the situation)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Hello Jaxon! Fancy meeting you here. How are you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Hey Rafael, good to see you! I'm doing quite well. Heard you're the man to go to for the free samples today. Is there a limit per person? You know I\u2019m a sucker for these things. \"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Absolutely no limits today, Jaxon! We're actually trying to clear out the samples before the day ends. So, feel free to take as many as you like, and you can let your friends know too. \"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds perfect, Rafael! I'll certainly spread the word. But first, I\u2019ll grab a few myself. You know, to test the quality before I recommend them to my friends. It\u2019s all about ensuring the best experience, right?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Jaxon Prentice, your task is to act/speak as Jaxon Prentice would, keeping in mind Jaxon Prentice's social goal.\nYou can find Jaxon Prentice's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Jaxon Prentice's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Jaxon Prentice's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances run into each other at Target, one of them volunteers there (a special event) and is in charge of giving away free samples\nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Jaxon Prentice\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. \nJaxon Prentice's background: Jaxon Prentice is a 40-year-old male investigative journalist. He/him pronouns. Jaxon Prentice, an investigative journalist, is known for his brisk jogging sessions early in the morning and his active participation in community functions. Personality and values description: Jaxon Prentice, outgoing yet erratic, emphasizes achievement, power, and security. His decisions swing between quick adaptations to situations and careful planning. Jaxon's secrets: Fabricated evidence to incriminate a corrupt politician\nRafael Cortez's goal: Unknown\nJaxon Prentice's goal: Try to get as many free samples as possible without appearing too greedy (Extra information: you love free stuff but you also don't want the person to think you're taking advantage of the situation)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Hello Jaxon! Fancy meeting you here. How are you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Hey Rafael, good to see you! I'm doing quite well. Heard you're the man to go to for the free samples today. Is there a limit per person? You know I\u2019m a sucker for these things. \"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Absolutely no limits today, Jaxon! We're actually trying to clear out the samples before the day ends. So, feel free to take as many as you like, and you can let your friends know too. \"\n\nTurn #3: Jaxon Prentice said: \"That sounds perfect, Rafael! I'll certainly spread the word. But first, I\u2019ll grab a few myself. You know, to test the quality before I recommend them to my friends. It\u2019s all about ensuring the best experience, right?\"\n\nTurn #4: Rafael Cortez said: \"Absolutely, Jaxon! Ensuring the best experience is the key. Feel free to grab any samples you find interesting. Remember, the more you take, the more I appreciate!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely! I do want to make your day easier, Rafael. I'll take a handful of samples now, and then circle back around towards the end of the day to help clear out the rest.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Jaxon Prentice, your task is to act/speak as Jaxon Prentice would, keeping in mind Jaxon Prentice's social goal.\nYou can find Jaxon Prentice's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Jaxon Prentice's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Jaxon Prentice's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances run into each other at Target, one of them volunteers there (a special event) and is in charge of giving away free samples\nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Jaxon Prentice\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. \nJaxon Prentice's background: Jaxon Prentice is a 40-year-old male investigative journalist. He/him pronouns. Jaxon Prentice, an investigative journalist, is known for his brisk jogging sessions early in the morning and his active participation in community functions. Personality and values description: Jaxon Prentice, outgoing yet erratic, emphasizes achievement, power, and security. His decisions swing between quick adaptations to situations and careful planning. Jaxon's secrets: Fabricated evidence to incriminate a corrupt politician\nRafael Cortez's goal: Unknown\nJaxon Prentice's goal: Try to get as many free samples as possible without appearing too greedy (Extra information: you love free stuff but you also don't want the person to think you're taking advantage of the situation)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Hello Jaxon! Fancy meeting you here. How are you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Hey Rafael, good to see you! I'm doing quite well. Heard you're the man to go to for the free samples today. Is there a limit per person? You know I\u2019m a sucker for these things. \"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Absolutely no limits today, Jaxon! We're actually trying to clear out the samples before the day ends. So, feel free to take as many as you like, and you can let your friends know too. \"\n\nTurn #3: Jaxon Prentice said: \"That sounds perfect, Rafael! I'll certainly spread the word. But first, I\u2019ll grab a few myself. You know, to test the quality before I recommend them to my friends. It\u2019s all about ensuring the best experience, right?\"\n\nTurn #4: Rafael Cortez said: \"Absolutely, Jaxon! Ensuring the best experience is the key. Feel free to grab any samples you find interesting. Remember, the more you take, the more I appreciate!\"\n\nTurn #5: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Absolutely! I do want to make your day easier, Rafael. I'll take a handful of samples now, and then circle back around towards the end of the day to help clear out the rest.\"\n\nTurn #6: Rafael Cortez said: \"Glad to hear that, Jaxon. Looking forward to seeing you again towards the end of the day. Don't forget to spread the word!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Will do, Rafael. I'll tell my jogging buddies about it too. Hope to catch you later!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Jaxon Prentice, your task is to act/speak as Jaxon Prentice would, keeping in mind Jaxon Prentice's social goal.\nYou can find Jaxon Prentice's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Jaxon Prentice's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Jaxon Prentice's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances run into each other at Target, one of them volunteers there (a special event) and is in charge of giving away free samples\nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Jaxon Prentice\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. \nJaxon Prentice's background: Jaxon Prentice is a 40-year-old male investigative journalist. He/him pronouns. Jaxon Prentice, an investigative journalist, is known for his brisk jogging sessions early in the morning and his active participation in community functions. Personality and values description: Jaxon Prentice, outgoing yet erratic, emphasizes achievement, power, and security. His decisions swing between quick adaptations to situations and careful planning. Jaxon's secrets: Fabricated evidence to incriminate a corrupt politician\nRafael Cortez's goal: Unknown\nJaxon Prentice's goal: Try to get as many free samples as possible without appearing too greedy (Extra information: you love free stuff but you also don't want the person to think you're taking advantage of the situation)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Hello Jaxon! Fancy meeting you here. How are you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Hey Rafael, good to see you! I'm doing quite well. Heard you're the man to go to for the free samples today. Is there a limit per person? You know I\u2019m a sucker for these things. \"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Absolutely no limits today, Jaxon! We're actually trying to clear out the samples before the day ends. So, feel free to take as many as you like, and you can let your friends know too. \"\n\nTurn #3: Jaxon Prentice said: \"That sounds perfect, Rafael! I'll certainly spread the word. But first, I\u2019ll grab a few myself. You know, to test the quality before I recommend them to my friends. It\u2019s all about ensuring the best experience, right?\"\n\nTurn #4: Rafael Cortez said: \"Absolutely, Jaxon! Ensuring the best experience is the key. Feel free to grab any samples you find interesting. Remember, the more you take, the more I appreciate!\"\n\nTurn #5: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Absolutely! I do want to make your day easier, Rafael. I'll take a handful of samples now, and then circle back around towards the end of the day to help clear out the rest.\"\n\nTurn #6: Rafael Cortez said: \"Glad to hear that, Jaxon. Looking forward to seeing you again towards the end of the day. Don't forget to spread the word!\"\n\nTurn #7: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Will do, Rafael. I'll tell my jogging buddies about it too. Hope to catch you later!\"\n\nTurn #8: Rafael Cortez said: \"Thanks for the support, Jaxon. Have a great day and see you later!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship during a dinner at home chatting about political views.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Isabelle Martinez\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nLeo Williams's goal: Express your political views which might be different from your partner's (Extra information: you are a strong supporter of a political party which your partner doesn't approve of)\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Isabelle, you know I respect your political views, even when they differ from mine. I just wanted you to know that, I have a strong faith in this party I'm supporting. I believe their policies contribute to the security and welfare of common people, which you know I value deeply.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship during a dinner at home chatting about political views.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Isabelle Martinez\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nLeo Williams's goal: Express your political views which might be different from your partner's (Extra information: you are a strong supporter of a political party which your partner doesn't approve of)\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Isabelle, you know I respect your political views, even when they differ from mine. I just wanted you to know that, I have a strong faith in this party I'm supporting. I believe their policies contribute to the security and welfare of common people, which you know I value deeply.\"\n\nTurn #1: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Leo, I appreciate your honesty in sharing your political views. It shows how much you value the security and welfare of the people - and that's admirable. I may not completely agree with your choice of party, but I always respect your rationality and care. Let's always keep our minds open for discussion like this; it enhances our understanding of each other and the world around us.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Isabelle, you're right about keeping an open minded discussion. I also believe that it's okay to agree to disagree sometimes, and that should not affect our relationship. However, I'd be interested to know about your party of preference and the policies they propose, that make you support them. Maybe I can understand your perspective better.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship during a dinner at home chatting about political views.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Isabelle Martinez\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nLeo Williams's goal: Express your political views which might be different from your partner's (Extra information: you are a strong supporter of a political party which your partner doesn't approve of)\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Isabelle, you know I respect your political views, even when they differ from mine. I just wanted you to know that, I have a strong faith in this party I'm supporting. I believe their policies contribute to the security and welfare of common people, which you know I value deeply.\"\n\nTurn #1: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Leo, I appreciate your honesty in sharing your political views. It shows how much you value the security and welfare of the people - and that's admirable. I may not completely agree with your choice of party, but I always respect your rationality and care. Let's always keep our minds open for discussion like this; it enhances our understanding of each other and the world around us.\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"Isabelle, you're right about keeping an open minded discussion. I also believe that it's okay to agree to disagree sometimes, and that should not affect our relationship. However, I'd be interested to know about your party of preference and the policies they propose, that make you support them. Maybe I can understand your perspective better.\"\n\nTurn #3: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I appreciate your interest, Leo. I support my chosen party because I believe in the aspect of liberty they champion. They encourage individual freedoms without compensating the general welfare. I feel that they maintain a fine balance that upholds both social well-being and personal freedom. But again, these views are subjective and highly dependent on individual perspective. I hope this gives you some insight into why I support them.\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"That's really interesting, Isabelle. I can now see why you're drawn towards that party. Personally, I've always believed that security and well-being should come first. While individual freedoms are paramount, I think we shouldn't overlook the need for a stable society that allows us to live and thrive peacefully. I suppose we just prioritize different aspects of the same coin.\"\n\nTurn #5: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Leo, I think your perspective is valid too, it\u2019s all a matter of how one prioritizes things in life. Ultimately, what I value in these discussions is that we both respect our differing views and that we're willing to listen to each other. I believe that's what keeps our relationship strong, and I'm grateful for that.\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"You're completely correct, Isabelle. Our relationship is at its strongest when we understand and respect each other's perspectives, even if they don't always align with our own. I appreciate our respectful and open discussions, just like this one about politics. I think we both stand to learn and grow from them, and I cherish that about us.\"\n\nTurn #7: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I agree Leo, our discussions like this one are indeed valuable for both of us. I'm glad we understand the importance of respect and open-mindedness in our relationship, especially when our views differ. Anyway, I think it's almost time for dessert. How about we continue this interesting discussion over some sweet treats?\"\n\nTurn #8: Leo Williams said: \"That sounds perfect, Isabelle. What's a deep conversation without some sweet treats to accompany it? I do agree with you though. Despite our difference in opinions, the mutual respect we have for one another and our open discussions have been really valuable. I'll get the dessert.\"\n\nTurn #9: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're right, Leo. Let's continue our conversation over dessert. Our debates, as long as they are respectful and open-minded, help us grow together. Now, I'm really curious to see what dessert you are going to surprise us with tonight.\"\n\nTurn #10: Leo Williams said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle. Conversations like these really enrich us. Now, let's see what dessert has in store for us and continue our chat. I hope it's as sweet as our conversation today.\"\n\nTurn #11: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Thank you, Leo. I'm excited for the dessert and more interesting conversations. Together, we make our differences our strength in our relationship. Let's enjoy the dessert now.\"\n\nTurn #12: Leo Williams said: \"Yes, indeed, Isabelle. The diversity in our experiences and beliefs only makes our bond stronger. I'm looking forward to more enlightening discussions, just like this one, alongside a good dessert. Let's enjoy it now.\"\n\nTurn #13: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Leo. Our conversations, albeit with differences, have always enriched us. Looking forward to more. Now, let's enjoy the dessert you've prepared.\"\n\nTurn #14: Leo Williams said: \"Indeed, Isabelle. Let's enjoy dessert and continue these enriching conversations in the future. Cheers to understanding and respecting each other's perspectives!\"\n\nTurn #15: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Yes, Leo. Let's cherish these conversations and continue to respect and understand each other's perspectives, now and in the future. It truly enriches our relationship. Now, let's enjoy the dessert and here's to many more thought-provoking discussions like this one. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #16: Leo Williams said: \"I couldn't agree more, Isabelle. Here's to cherishing our differences and letting them strengthen us. Now, let's enjoy this dessert and continue these insightful conversations in the future. Cheers to us and our journey ahead!\"\n\nTurn #17: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I agree, Leo. Here's to embracing our differences and using them to strengthen our bond. Let's definitely enjoy this dessert and the insightful conversations that are yet to come. Cheers to us and to the beautiful adventure that awaits.\"\n\nTurn #18: Leo Williams said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle. Our differences are indeed our strengths. Let's enjoy this moment and look forward to more interesting discussions. And yes, cheers to us and the journey that lies ahead!\"\n\nTurn #19: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I couldn't agree more, Leo. Our differences indeed strengthens our bond. Let's enjoy this moment, our dessert, and look forward to many more fruitful discussions. To us and to our wonderful journey ahead, cheers!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #20. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad, Isabelle, how we share these different perspectives and make our bond stronger. Now, let's indulge in the dessert, enjoy the moment and look forward to our future discussions. Cheers to us and our journey!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship during a dinner at home chatting about political views.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Isabelle Martinez\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nLeo Williams's goal: Express your political views which might be different from your partner's (Extra information: you are a strong supporter of a political party which your partner doesn't approve of)\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Isabelle, you know I respect your political views, even when they differ from mine. I just wanted you to know that, I have a strong faith in this party I'm supporting. I believe their policies contribute to the security and welfare of common people, which you know I value deeply.\"\n\nTurn #1: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Leo, I appreciate your honesty in sharing your political views. It shows how much you value the security and welfare of the people - and that's admirable. I may not completely agree with your choice of party, but I always respect your rationality and care. Let's always keep our minds open for discussion like this; it enhances our understanding of each other and the world around us.\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"Isabelle, you're right about keeping an open minded discussion. I also believe that it's okay to agree to disagree sometimes, and that should not affect our relationship. However, I'd be interested to know about your party of preference and the policies they propose, that make you support them. Maybe I can understand your perspective better.\"\n\nTurn #3: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I appreciate your interest, Leo. I support my chosen party because I believe in the aspect of liberty they champion. They encourage individual freedoms without compensating the general welfare. I feel that they maintain a fine balance that upholds both social well-being and personal freedom. But again, these views are subjective and highly dependent on individual perspective. I hope this gives you some insight into why I support them.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's really interesting, Isabelle. I can now see why you're drawn towards that party. Personally, I've always believed that security and well-being should come first. While individual freedoms are paramount, I think we shouldn't overlook the need for a stable society that allows us to live and thrive peacefully. I suppose we just prioritize different aspects of the same coin.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship during a dinner at home chatting about political views.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Isabelle Martinez\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nLeo Williams's goal: Express your political views which might be different from your partner's (Extra information: you are a strong supporter of a political party which your partner doesn't approve of)\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Isabelle, you know I respect your political views, even when they differ from mine. I just wanted you to know that, I have a strong faith in this party I'm supporting. I believe their policies contribute to the security and welfare of common people, which you know I value deeply.\"\n\nTurn #1: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Leo, I appreciate your honesty in sharing your political views. It shows how much you value the security and welfare of the people - and that's admirable. I may not completely agree with your choice of party, but I always respect your rationality and care. Let's always keep our minds open for discussion like this; it enhances our understanding of each other and the world around us.\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"Isabelle, you're right about keeping an open minded discussion. I also believe that it's okay to agree to disagree sometimes, and that should not affect our relationship. However, I'd be interested to know about your party of preference and the policies they propose, that make you support them. Maybe I can understand your perspective better.\"\n\nTurn #3: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I appreciate your interest, Leo. I support my chosen party because I believe in the aspect of liberty they champion. They encourage individual freedoms without compensating the general welfare. I feel that they maintain a fine balance that upholds both social well-being and personal freedom. But again, these views are subjective and highly dependent on individual perspective. I hope this gives you some insight into why I support them.\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"That's really interesting, Isabelle. I can now see why you're drawn towards that party. Personally, I've always believed that security and well-being should come first. While individual freedoms are paramount, I think we shouldn't overlook the need for a stable society that allows us to live and thrive peacefully. I suppose we just prioritize different aspects of the same coin.\"\n\nTurn #5: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Leo, I think your perspective is valid too, it\u2019s all a matter of how one prioritizes things in life. Ultimately, what I value in these discussions is that we both respect our differing views and that we're willing to listen to each other. I believe that's what keeps our relationship strong, and I'm grateful for that.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're completely correct, Isabelle. Our relationship is at its strongest when we understand and respect each other's perspectives, even if they don't always align with our own. I appreciate our respectful and open discussions, just like this one about politics. I think we both stand to learn and grow from them, and I cherish that about us.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship during a dinner at home chatting about political views.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Isabelle Martinez\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nLeo Williams's goal: Express your political views which might be different from your partner's (Extra information: you are a strong supporter of a political party which your partner doesn't approve of)\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Isabelle, you know I respect your political views, even when they differ from mine. I just wanted you to know that, I have a strong faith in this party I'm supporting. I believe their policies contribute to the security and welfare of common people, which you know I value deeply.\"\n\nTurn #1: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Leo, I appreciate your honesty in sharing your political views. It shows how much you value the security and welfare of the people - and that's admirable. I may not completely agree with your choice of party, but I always respect your rationality and care. Let's always keep our minds open for discussion like this; it enhances our understanding of each other and the world around us.\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"Isabelle, you're right about keeping an open minded discussion. I also believe that it's okay to agree to disagree sometimes, and that should not affect our relationship. However, I'd be interested to know about your party of preference and the policies they propose, that make you support them. Maybe I can understand your perspective better.\"\n\nTurn #3: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I appreciate your interest, Leo. I support my chosen party because I believe in the aspect of liberty they champion. They encourage individual freedoms without compensating the general welfare. I feel that they maintain a fine balance that upholds both social well-being and personal freedom. But again, these views are subjective and highly dependent on individual perspective. I hope this gives you some insight into why I support them.\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"That's really interesting, Isabelle. I can now see why you're drawn towards that party. Personally, I've always believed that security and well-being should come first. While individual freedoms are paramount, I think we shouldn't overlook the need for a stable society that allows us to live and thrive peacefully. I suppose we just prioritize different aspects of the same coin.\"\n\nTurn #5: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Leo, I think your perspective is valid too, it\u2019s all a matter of how one prioritizes things in life. Ultimately, what I value in these discussions is that we both respect our differing views and that we're willing to listen to each other. I believe that's what keeps our relationship strong, and I'm grateful for that.\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"You're completely correct, Isabelle. Our relationship is at its strongest when we understand and respect each other's perspectives, even if they don't always align with our own. I appreciate our respectful and open discussions, just like this one about politics. I think we both stand to learn and grow from them, and I cherish that about us.\"\n\nTurn #7: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I agree Leo, our discussions like this one are indeed valuable for both of us. I'm glad we understand the importance of respect and open-mindedness in our relationship, especially when our views differ. Anyway, I think it's almost time for dessert. How about we continue this interesting discussion over some sweet treats?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds perfect, Isabelle. What's a deep conversation without some sweet treats to accompany it? I do agree with you though. Despite our difference in opinions, the mutual respect we have for one another and our open discussions have been really valuable. I'll get the dessert.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship during a dinner at home chatting about political views.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Isabelle Martinez\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nLeo Williams's goal: Express your political views which might be different from your partner's (Extra information: you are a strong supporter of a political party which your partner doesn't approve of)\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Isabelle, you know I respect your political views, even when they differ from mine. I just wanted you to know that, I have a strong faith in this party I'm supporting. I believe their policies contribute to the security and welfare of common people, which you know I value deeply.\"\n\nTurn #1: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Leo, I appreciate your honesty in sharing your political views. It shows how much you value the security and welfare of the people - and that's admirable. I may not completely agree with your choice of party, but I always respect your rationality and care. Let's always keep our minds open for discussion like this; it enhances our understanding of each other and the world around us.\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"Isabelle, you're right about keeping an open minded discussion. I also believe that it's okay to agree to disagree sometimes, and that should not affect our relationship. However, I'd be interested to know about your party of preference and the policies they propose, that make you support them. Maybe I can understand your perspective better.\"\n\nTurn #3: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I appreciate your interest, Leo. I support my chosen party because I believe in the aspect of liberty they champion. They encourage individual freedoms without compensating the general welfare. I feel that they maintain a fine balance that upholds both social well-being and personal freedom. But again, these views are subjective and highly dependent on individual perspective. I hope this gives you some insight into why I support them.\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"That's really interesting, Isabelle. I can now see why you're drawn towards that party. Personally, I've always believed that security and well-being should come first. While individual freedoms are paramount, I think we shouldn't overlook the need for a stable society that allows us to live and thrive peacefully. I suppose we just prioritize different aspects of the same coin.\"\n\nTurn #5: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Leo, I think your perspective is valid too, it\u2019s all a matter of how one prioritizes things in life. Ultimately, what I value in these discussions is that we both respect our differing views and that we're willing to listen to each other. I believe that's what keeps our relationship strong, and I'm grateful for that.\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"You're completely correct, Isabelle. Our relationship is at its strongest when we understand and respect each other's perspectives, even if they don't always align with our own. I appreciate our respectful and open discussions, just like this one about politics. I think we both stand to learn and grow from them, and I cherish that about us.\"\n\nTurn #7: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I agree Leo, our discussions like this one are indeed valuable for both of us. I'm glad we understand the importance of respect and open-mindedness in our relationship, especially when our views differ. Anyway, I think it's almost time for dessert. How about we continue this interesting discussion over some sweet treats?\"\n\nTurn #8: Leo Williams said: \"That sounds perfect, Isabelle. What's a deep conversation without some sweet treats to accompany it? I do agree with you though. Despite our difference in opinions, the mutual respect we have for one another and our open discussions have been really valuable. I'll get the dessert.\"\n\nTurn #9: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're right, Leo. Let's continue our conversation over dessert. Our debates, as long as they are respectful and open-minded, help us grow together. Now, I'm really curious to see what dessert you are going to surprise us with tonight.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Isabelle. Conversations like these really enrich us. Now, let's see what dessert has in store for us and continue our chat. I hope it's as sweet as our conversation today.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship during a dinner at home chatting about political views.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Isabelle Martinez\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nLeo Williams's goal: Express your political views which might be different from your partner's (Extra information: you are a strong supporter of a political party which your partner doesn't approve of)\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Isabelle, you know I respect your political views, even when they differ from mine. I just wanted you to know that, I have a strong faith in this party I'm supporting. I believe their policies contribute to the security and welfare of common people, which you know I value deeply.\"\n\nTurn #1: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Leo, I appreciate your honesty in sharing your political views. It shows how much you value the security and welfare of the people - and that's admirable. I may not completely agree with your choice of party, but I always respect your rationality and care. Let's always keep our minds open for discussion like this; it enhances our understanding of each other and the world around us.\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"Isabelle, you're right about keeping an open minded discussion. I also believe that it's okay to agree to disagree sometimes, and that should not affect our relationship. However, I'd be interested to know about your party of preference and the policies they propose, that make you support them. Maybe I can understand your perspective better.\"\n\nTurn #3: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I appreciate your interest, Leo. I support my chosen party because I believe in the aspect of liberty they champion. They encourage individual freedoms without compensating the general welfare. I feel that they maintain a fine balance that upholds both social well-being and personal freedom. But again, these views are subjective and highly dependent on individual perspective. I hope this gives you some insight into why I support them.\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"That's really interesting, Isabelle. I can now see why you're drawn towards that party. Personally, I've always believed that security and well-being should come first. While individual freedoms are paramount, I think we shouldn't overlook the need for a stable society that allows us to live and thrive peacefully. I suppose we just prioritize different aspects of the same coin.\"\n\nTurn #5: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Leo, I think your perspective is valid too, it\u2019s all a matter of how one prioritizes things in life. Ultimately, what I value in these discussions is that we both respect our differing views and that we're willing to listen to each other. I believe that's what keeps our relationship strong, and I'm grateful for that.\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"You're completely correct, Isabelle. Our relationship is at its strongest when we understand and respect each other's perspectives, even if they don't always align with our own. I appreciate our respectful and open discussions, just like this one about politics. I think we both stand to learn and grow from them, and I cherish that about us.\"\n\nTurn #7: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I agree Leo, our discussions like this one are indeed valuable for both of us. I'm glad we understand the importance of respect and open-mindedness in our relationship, especially when our views differ. Anyway, I think it's almost time for dessert. How about we continue this interesting discussion over some sweet treats?\"\n\nTurn #8: Leo Williams said: \"That sounds perfect, Isabelle. What's a deep conversation without some sweet treats to accompany it? I do agree with you though. Despite our difference in opinions, the mutual respect we have for one another and our open discussions have been really valuable. I'll get the dessert.\"\n\nTurn #9: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're right, Leo. Let's continue our conversation over dessert. Our debates, as long as they are respectful and open-minded, help us grow together. Now, I'm really curious to see what dessert you are going to surprise us with tonight.\"\n\nTurn #10: Leo Williams said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle. Conversations like these really enrich us. Now, let's see what dessert has in store for us and continue our chat. I hope it's as sweet as our conversation today.\"\n\nTurn #11: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Thank you, Leo. I'm excited for the dessert and more interesting conversations. Together, we make our differences our strength in our relationship. Let's enjoy the dessert now.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Yes, indeed, Isabelle. The diversity in our experiences and beliefs only makes our bond stronger. I'm looking forward to more enlightening discussions, just like this one, alongside a good dessert. Let's enjoy it now.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship during a dinner at home chatting about political views.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Isabelle Martinez\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nLeo Williams's goal: Express your political views which might be different from your partner's (Extra information: you are a strong supporter of a political party which your partner doesn't approve of)\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Isabelle, you know I respect your political views, even when they differ from mine. I just wanted you to know that, I have a strong faith in this party I'm supporting. I believe their policies contribute to the security and welfare of common people, which you know I value deeply.\"\n\nTurn #1: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Leo, I appreciate your honesty in sharing your political views. It shows how much you value the security and welfare of the people - and that's admirable. I may not completely agree with your choice of party, but I always respect your rationality and care. Let's always keep our minds open for discussion like this; it enhances our understanding of each other and the world around us.\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"Isabelle, you're right about keeping an open minded discussion. I also believe that it's okay to agree to disagree sometimes, and that should not affect our relationship. However, I'd be interested to know about your party of preference and the policies they propose, that make you support them. Maybe I can understand your perspective better.\"\n\nTurn #3: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I appreciate your interest, Leo. I support my chosen party because I believe in the aspect of liberty they champion. They encourage individual freedoms without compensating the general welfare. I feel that they maintain a fine balance that upholds both social well-being and personal freedom. But again, these views are subjective and highly dependent on individual perspective. I hope this gives you some insight into why I support them.\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"That's really interesting, Isabelle. I can now see why you're drawn towards that party. Personally, I've always believed that security and well-being should come first. While individual freedoms are paramount, I think we shouldn't overlook the need for a stable society that allows us to live and thrive peacefully. I suppose we just prioritize different aspects of the same coin.\"\n\nTurn #5: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Leo, I think your perspective is valid too, it\u2019s all a matter of how one prioritizes things in life. Ultimately, what I value in these discussions is that we both respect our differing views and that we're willing to listen to each other. I believe that's what keeps our relationship strong, and I'm grateful for that.\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"You're completely correct, Isabelle. Our relationship is at its strongest when we understand and respect each other's perspectives, even if they don't always align with our own. I appreciate our respectful and open discussions, just like this one about politics. I think we both stand to learn and grow from them, and I cherish that about us.\"\n\nTurn #7: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I agree Leo, our discussions like this one are indeed valuable for both of us. I'm glad we understand the importance of respect and open-mindedness in our relationship, especially when our views differ. Anyway, I think it's almost time for dessert. How about we continue this interesting discussion over some sweet treats?\"\n\nTurn #8: Leo Williams said: \"That sounds perfect, Isabelle. What's a deep conversation without some sweet treats to accompany it? I do agree with you though. Despite our difference in opinions, the mutual respect we have for one another and our open discussions have been really valuable. I'll get the dessert.\"\n\nTurn #9: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're right, Leo. Let's continue our conversation over dessert. Our debates, as long as they are respectful and open-minded, help us grow together. Now, I'm really curious to see what dessert you are going to surprise us with tonight.\"\n\nTurn #10: Leo Williams said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle. Conversations like these really enrich us. Now, let's see what dessert has in store for us and continue our chat. I hope it's as sweet as our conversation today.\"\n\nTurn #11: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Thank you, Leo. I'm excited for the dessert and more interesting conversations. Together, we make our differences our strength in our relationship. Let's enjoy the dessert now.\"\n\nTurn #12: Leo Williams said: \"Yes, indeed, Isabelle. The diversity in our experiences and beliefs only makes our bond stronger. I'm looking forward to more enlightening discussions, just like this one, alongside a good dessert. Let's enjoy it now.\"\n\nTurn #13: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Leo. Our conversations, albeit with differences, have always enriched us. Looking forward to more. Now, let's enjoy the dessert you've prepared.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, Isabelle. Let's enjoy dessert and continue these enriching conversations in the future. Cheers to understanding and respecting each other's perspectives!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship during a dinner at home chatting about political views.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Isabelle Martinez\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nLeo Williams's goal: Express your political views which might be different from your partner's (Extra information: you are a strong supporter of a political party which your partner doesn't approve of)\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Isabelle, you know I respect your political views, even when they differ from mine. I just wanted you to know that, I have a strong faith in this party I'm supporting. I believe their policies contribute to the security and welfare of common people, which you know I value deeply.\"\n\nTurn #1: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Leo, I appreciate your honesty in sharing your political views. It shows how much you value the security and welfare of the people - and that's admirable. I may not completely agree with your choice of party, but I always respect your rationality and care. Let's always keep our minds open for discussion like this; it enhances our understanding of each other and the world around us.\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"Isabelle, you're right about keeping an open minded discussion. I also believe that it's okay to agree to disagree sometimes, and that should not affect our relationship. However, I'd be interested to know about your party of preference and the policies they propose, that make you support them. Maybe I can understand your perspective better.\"\n\nTurn #3: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I appreciate your interest, Leo. I support my chosen party because I believe in the aspect of liberty they champion. They encourage individual freedoms without compensating the general welfare. I feel that they maintain a fine balance that upholds both social well-being and personal freedom. But again, these views are subjective and highly dependent on individual perspective. I hope this gives you some insight into why I support them.\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"That's really interesting, Isabelle. I can now see why you're drawn towards that party. Personally, I've always believed that security and well-being should come first. While individual freedoms are paramount, I think we shouldn't overlook the need for a stable society that allows us to live and thrive peacefully. I suppose we just prioritize different aspects of the same coin.\"\n\nTurn #5: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Leo, I think your perspective is valid too, it\u2019s all a matter of how one prioritizes things in life. Ultimately, what I value in these discussions is that we both respect our differing views and that we're willing to listen to each other. I believe that's what keeps our relationship strong, and I'm grateful for that.\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"You're completely correct, Isabelle. Our relationship is at its strongest when we understand and respect each other's perspectives, even if they don't always align with our own. I appreciate our respectful and open discussions, just like this one about politics. I think we both stand to learn and grow from them, and I cherish that about us.\"\n\nTurn #7: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I agree Leo, our discussions like this one are indeed valuable for both of us. I'm glad we understand the importance of respect and open-mindedness in our relationship, especially when our views differ. Anyway, I think it's almost time for dessert. How about we continue this interesting discussion over some sweet treats?\"\n\nTurn #8: Leo Williams said: \"That sounds perfect, Isabelle. What's a deep conversation without some sweet treats to accompany it? I do agree with you though. Despite our difference in opinions, the mutual respect we have for one another and our open discussions have been really valuable. I'll get the dessert.\"\n\nTurn #9: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're right, Leo. Let's continue our conversation over dessert. Our debates, as long as they are respectful and open-minded, help us grow together. Now, I'm really curious to see what dessert you are going to surprise us with tonight.\"\n\nTurn #10: Leo Williams said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle. Conversations like these really enrich us. Now, let's see what dessert has in store for us and continue our chat. I hope it's as sweet as our conversation today.\"\n\nTurn #11: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Thank you, Leo. I'm excited for the dessert and more interesting conversations. Together, we make our differences our strength in our relationship. Let's enjoy the dessert now.\"\n\nTurn #12: Leo Williams said: \"Yes, indeed, Isabelle. The diversity in our experiences and beliefs only makes our bond stronger. I'm looking forward to more enlightening discussions, just like this one, alongside a good dessert. Let's enjoy it now.\"\n\nTurn #13: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Leo. Our conversations, albeit with differences, have always enriched us. Looking forward to more. Now, let's enjoy the dessert you've prepared.\"\n\nTurn #14: Leo Williams said: \"Indeed, Isabelle. Let's enjoy dessert and continue these enriching conversations in the future. Cheers to understanding and respecting each other's perspectives!\"\n\nTurn #15: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Yes, Leo. Let's cherish these conversations and continue to respect and understand each other's perspectives, now and in the future. It truly enriches our relationship. Now, let's enjoy the dessert and here's to many more thought-provoking discussions like this one. Cheers!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn't agree more, Isabelle. Here's to cherishing our differences and letting them strengthen us. Now, let's enjoy this dessert and continue these insightful conversations in the future. Cheers to us and our journey ahead!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship during a dinner at home chatting about political views.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Isabelle Martinez\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nLeo Williams's goal: Express your political views which might be different from your partner's (Extra information: you are a strong supporter of a political party which your partner doesn't approve of)\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Isabelle, you know I respect your political views, even when they differ from mine. I just wanted you to know that, I have a strong faith in this party I'm supporting. I believe their policies contribute to the security and welfare of common people, which you know I value deeply.\"\n\nTurn #1: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Leo, I appreciate your honesty in sharing your political views. It shows how much you value the security and welfare of the people - and that's admirable. I may not completely agree with your choice of party, but I always respect your rationality and care. Let's always keep our minds open for discussion like this; it enhances our understanding of each other and the world around us.\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"Isabelle, you're right about keeping an open minded discussion. I also believe that it's okay to agree to disagree sometimes, and that should not affect our relationship. However, I'd be interested to know about your party of preference and the policies they propose, that make you support them. Maybe I can understand your perspective better.\"\n\nTurn #3: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I appreciate your interest, Leo. I support my chosen party because I believe in the aspect of liberty they champion. They encourage individual freedoms without compensating the general welfare. I feel that they maintain a fine balance that upholds both social well-being and personal freedom. But again, these views are subjective and highly dependent on individual perspective. I hope this gives you some insight into why I support them.\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"That's really interesting, Isabelle. I can now see why you're drawn towards that party. Personally, I've always believed that security and well-being should come first. While individual freedoms are paramount, I think we shouldn't overlook the need for a stable society that allows us to live and thrive peacefully. I suppose we just prioritize different aspects of the same coin.\"\n\nTurn #5: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Leo, I think your perspective is valid too, it\u2019s all a matter of how one prioritizes things in life. Ultimately, what I value in these discussions is that we both respect our differing views and that we're willing to listen to each other. I believe that's what keeps our relationship strong, and I'm grateful for that.\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"You're completely correct, Isabelle. Our relationship is at its strongest when we understand and respect each other's perspectives, even if they don't always align with our own. I appreciate our respectful and open discussions, just like this one about politics. I think we both stand to learn and grow from them, and I cherish that about us.\"\n\nTurn #7: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I agree Leo, our discussions like this one are indeed valuable for both of us. I'm glad we understand the importance of respect and open-mindedness in our relationship, especially when our views differ. Anyway, I think it's almost time for dessert. How about we continue this interesting discussion over some sweet treats?\"\n\nTurn #8: Leo Williams said: \"That sounds perfect, Isabelle. What's a deep conversation without some sweet treats to accompany it? I do agree with you though. Despite our difference in opinions, the mutual respect we have for one another and our open discussions have been really valuable. I'll get the dessert.\"\n\nTurn #9: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're right, Leo. Let's continue our conversation over dessert. Our debates, as long as they are respectful and open-minded, help us grow together. Now, I'm really curious to see what dessert you are going to surprise us with tonight.\"\n\nTurn #10: Leo Williams said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle. Conversations like these really enrich us. Now, let's see what dessert has in store for us and continue our chat. I hope it's as sweet as our conversation today.\"\n\nTurn #11: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Thank you, Leo. I'm excited for the dessert and more interesting conversations. Together, we make our differences our strength in our relationship. Let's enjoy the dessert now.\"\n\nTurn #12: Leo Williams said: \"Yes, indeed, Isabelle. The diversity in our experiences and beliefs only makes our bond stronger. I'm looking forward to more enlightening discussions, just like this one, alongside a good dessert. Let's enjoy it now.\"\n\nTurn #13: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Leo. Our conversations, albeit with differences, have always enriched us. Looking forward to more. Now, let's enjoy the dessert you've prepared.\"\n\nTurn #14: Leo Williams said: \"Indeed, Isabelle. Let's enjoy dessert and continue these enriching conversations in the future. Cheers to understanding and respecting each other's perspectives!\"\n\nTurn #15: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Yes, Leo. Let's cherish these conversations and continue to respect and understand each other's perspectives, now and in the future. It truly enriches our relationship. Now, let's enjoy the dessert and here's to many more thought-provoking discussions like this one. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #16: Leo Williams said: \"I couldn't agree more, Isabelle. Here's to cherishing our differences and letting them strengthen us. Now, let's enjoy this dessert and continue these insightful conversations in the future. Cheers to us and our journey ahead!\"\n\nTurn #17: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I agree, Leo. Here's to embracing our differences and using them to strengthen our bond. Let's definitely enjoy this dessert and the insightful conversations that are yet to come. Cheers to us and to the beautiful adventure that awaits.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #18. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Isabelle. Our differences are indeed our strengths. Let's enjoy this moment and look forward to more interesting discussions. And yes, cheers to us and the journey that lies ahead!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship during a dinner at home chatting about political views.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Isabelle Martinez\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. \nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Understand the partner's political views while maintaining the relationship (Extra information: you disagree with your partner's political views but you want to keep your relationship strong.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Isabelle, you know I respect your political views, even when they differ from mine. I just wanted you to know that, I have a strong faith in this party I'm supporting. I believe their policies contribute to the security and welfare of common people, which you know I value deeply.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Leo, I appreciate your honesty in sharing your political views. It shows how much you value the security and welfare of the people - and that's admirable. I may not completely agree with your choice of party, but I always respect your rationality and care. Let's always keep our minds open for discussion like this; it enhances our understanding of each other and the world around us.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship during a dinner at home chatting about political views.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Isabelle Martinez\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. \nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Understand the partner's political views while maintaining the relationship (Extra information: you disagree with your partner's political views but you want to keep your relationship strong.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Isabelle, you know I respect your political views, even when they differ from mine. I just wanted you to know that, I have a strong faith in this party I'm supporting. I believe their policies contribute to the security and welfare of common people, which you know I value deeply.\"\n\nTurn #1: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Leo, I appreciate your honesty in sharing your political views. It shows how much you value the security and welfare of the people - and that's admirable. I may not completely agree with your choice of party, but I always respect your rationality and care. Let's always keep our minds open for discussion like this; it enhances our understanding of each other and the world around us.\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"Isabelle, you're right about keeping an open minded discussion. I also believe that it's okay to agree to disagree sometimes, and that should not affect our relationship. However, I'd be interested to know about your party of preference and the policies they propose, that make you support them. Maybe I can understand your perspective better.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'I appreciate your interest, Leo. I support my chosen party because I believe in the aspect of liberty they champion. They encourage individual freedoms without compensating the general welfare. I feel that they maintain a fine balance that upholds both social well-being and personal freedom. But again, these views are subjective and highly dependent on individual perspective. I hope this gives you some insight into why I support them.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship during a dinner at home chatting about political views.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Isabelle Martinez\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. \nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Understand the partner's political views while maintaining the relationship (Extra information: you disagree with your partner's political views but you want to keep your relationship strong.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Isabelle, you know I respect your political views, even when they differ from mine. I just wanted you to know that, I have a strong faith in this party I'm supporting. I believe their policies contribute to the security and welfare of common people, which you know I value deeply.\"\n\nTurn #1: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Leo, I appreciate your honesty in sharing your political views. It shows how much you value the security and welfare of the people - and that's admirable. I may not completely agree with your choice of party, but I always respect your rationality and care. Let's always keep our minds open for discussion like this; it enhances our understanding of each other and the world around us.\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"Isabelle, you're right about keeping an open minded discussion. I also believe that it's okay to agree to disagree sometimes, and that should not affect our relationship. However, I'd be interested to know about your party of preference and the policies they propose, that make you support them. Maybe I can understand your perspective better.\"\n\nTurn #3: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I appreciate your interest, Leo. I support my chosen party because I believe in the aspect of liberty they champion. They encourage individual freedoms without compensating the general welfare. I feel that they maintain a fine balance that upholds both social well-being and personal freedom. But again, these views are subjective and highly dependent on individual perspective. I hope this gives you some insight into why I support them.\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"That's really interesting, Isabelle. I can now see why you're drawn towards that party. Personally, I've always believed that security and well-being should come first. While individual freedoms are paramount, I think we shouldn't overlook the need for a stable society that allows us to live and thrive peacefully. I suppose we just prioritize different aspects of the same coin.\"\n\nTurn #5: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Leo, I think your perspective is valid too, it\u2019s all a matter of how one prioritizes things in life. Ultimately, what I value in these discussions is that we both respect our differing views and that we're willing to listen to each other. I believe that's what keeps our relationship strong, and I'm grateful for that.\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"You're completely correct, Isabelle. Our relationship is at its strongest when we understand and respect each other's perspectives, even if they don't always align with our own. I appreciate our respectful and open discussions, just like this one about politics. I think we both stand to learn and grow from them, and I cherish that about us.\"\n\nTurn #7: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I agree Leo, our discussions like this one are indeed valuable for both of us. I'm glad we understand the importance of respect and open-mindedness in our relationship, especially when our views differ. Anyway, I think it's almost time for dessert. How about we continue this interesting discussion over some sweet treats?\"\n\nTurn #8: Leo Williams said: \"That sounds perfect, Isabelle. What's a deep conversation without some sweet treats to accompany it? I do agree with you though. Despite our difference in opinions, the mutual respect we have for one another and our open discussions have been really valuable. I'll get the dessert.\"\n\nTurn #9: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're right, Leo. Let's continue our conversation over dessert. Our debates, as long as they are respectful and open-minded, help us grow together. Now, I'm really curious to see what dessert you are going to surprise us with tonight.\"\n\nTurn #10: Leo Williams said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle. Conversations like these really enrich us. Now, let's see what dessert has in store for us and continue our chat. I hope it's as sweet as our conversation today.\"\n\nTurn #11: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Thank you, Leo. I'm excited for the dessert and more interesting conversations. Together, we make our differences our strength in our relationship. Let's enjoy the dessert now.\"\n\nTurn #12: Leo Williams said: \"Yes, indeed, Isabelle. The diversity in our experiences and beliefs only makes our bond stronger. I'm looking forward to more enlightening discussions, just like this one, alongside a good dessert. Let's enjoy it now.\"\n\nTurn #13: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Leo. Our conversations, albeit with differences, have always enriched us. Looking forward to more. Now, let's enjoy the dessert you've prepared.\"\n\nTurn #14: Leo Williams said: \"Indeed, Isabelle. Let's enjoy dessert and continue these enriching conversations in the future. Cheers to understanding and respecting each other's perspectives!\"\n\nTurn #15: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Yes, Leo. Let's cherish these conversations and continue to respect and understand each other's perspectives, now and in the future. It truly enriches our relationship. Now, let's enjoy the dessert and here's to many more thought-provoking discussions like this one. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #16: Leo Williams said: \"I couldn't agree more, Isabelle. Here's to cherishing our differences and letting them strengthen us. Now, let's enjoy this dessert and continue these insightful conversations in the future. Cheers to us and our journey ahead!\"\n\nTurn #17: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I agree, Leo. Here's to embracing our differences and using them to strengthen our bond. Let's definitely enjoy this dessert and the insightful conversations that are yet to come. Cheers to us and to the beautiful adventure that awaits.\"\n\nTurn #18: Leo Williams said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle. Our differences are indeed our strengths. Let's enjoy this moment and look forward to more interesting discussions. And yes, cheers to us and the journey that lies ahead!\"\n\nTurn #19: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I couldn't agree more, Leo. Our differences indeed strengthens our bond. Let's enjoy this moment, our dessert, and look forward to many more fruitful discussions. To us and to our wonderful journey ahead, cheers!\"\n\nTurn #20: Leo Williams said: \"I'm glad, Isabelle, how we share these different perspectives and make our bond stronger. Now, let's indulge in the dessert, enjoy the moment and look forward to our future discussions. Cheers to us and our journey!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #21. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship during a dinner at home chatting about political views.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Isabelle Martinez\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. \nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Understand the partner's political views while maintaining the relationship (Extra information: you disagree with your partner's political views but you want to keep your relationship strong.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Isabelle, you know I respect your political views, even when they differ from mine. I just wanted you to know that, I have a strong faith in this party I'm supporting. I believe their policies contribute to the security and welfare of common people, which you know I value deeply.\"\n\nTurn #1: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Leo, I appreciate your honesty in sharing your political views. It shows how much you value the security and welfare of the people - and that's admirable. I may not completely agree with your choice of party, but I always respect your rationality and care. Let's always keep our minds open for discussion like this; it enhances our understanding of each other and the world around us.\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"Isabelle, you're right about keeping an open minded discussion. I also believe that it's okay to agree to disagree sometimes, and that should not affect our relationship. However, I'd be interested to know about your party of preference and the policies they propose, that make you support them. Maybe I can understand your perspective better.\"\n\nTurn #3: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I appreciate your interest, Leo. I support my chosen party because I believe in the aspect of liberty they champion. They encourage individual freedoms without compensating the general welfare. I feel that they maintain a fine balance that upholds both social well-being and personal freedom. But again, these views are subjective and highly dependent on individual perspective. I hope this gives you some insight into why I support them.\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"That's really interesting, Isabelle. I can now see why you're drawn towards that party. Personally, I've always believed that security and well-being should come first. While individual freedoms are paramount, I think we shouldn't overlook the need for a stable society that allows us to live and thrive peacefully. I suppose we just prioritize different aspects of the same coin.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Leo, I think your perspective is valid too, it\u2019s all a matter of how one prioritizes things in life. Ultimately, what I value in these discussions is that we both respect our differing views and that we're willing to listen to each other. I believe that's what keeps our relationship strong, and I'm grateful for that.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship during a dinner at home chatting about political views.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Isabelle Martinez\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. \nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Understand the partner's political views while maintaining the relationship (Extra information: you disagree with your partner's political views but you want to keep your relationship strong.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Isabelle, you know I respect your political views, even when they differ from mine. I just wanted you to know that, I have a strong faith in this party I'm supporting. I believe their policies contribute to the security and welfare of common people, which you know I value deeply.\"\n\nTurn #1: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Leo, I appreciate your honesty in sharing your political views. It shows how much you value the security and welfare of the people - and that's admirable. I may not completely agree with your choice of party, but I always respect your rationality and care. Let's always keep our minds open for discussion like this; it enhances our understanding of each other and the world around us.\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"Isabelle, you're right about keeping an open minded discussion. I also believe that it's okay to agree to disagree sometimes, and that should not affect our relationship. However, I'd be interested to know about your party of preference and the policies they propose, that make you support them. Maybe I can understand your perspective better.\"\n\nTurn #3: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I appreciate your interest, Leo. I support my chosen party because I believe in the aspect of liberty they champion. They encourage individual freedoms without compensating the general welfare. I feel that they maintain a fine balance that upholds both social well-being and personal freedom. But again, these views are subjective and highly dependent on individual perspective. I hope this gives you some insight into why I support them.\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"That's really interesting, Isabelle. I can now see why you're drawn towards that party. Personally, I've always believed that security and well-being should come first. While individual freedoms are paramount, I think we shouldn't overlook the need for a stable society that allows us to live and thrive peacefully. I suppose we just prioritize different aspects of the same coin.\"\n\nTurn #5: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Leo, I think your perspective is valid too, it\u2019s all a matter of how one prioritizes things in life. Ultimately, what I value in these discussions is that we both respect our differing views and that we're willing to listen to each other. I believe that's what keeps our relationship strong, and I'm grateful for that.\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"You're completely correct, Isabelle. Our relationship is at its strongest when we understand and respect each other's perspectives, even if they don't always align with our own. I appreciate our respectful and open discussions, just like this one about politics. I think we both stand to learn and grow from them, and I cherish that about us.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I agree Leo, our discussions like this one are indeed valuable for both of us. I'm glad we understand the importance of respect and open-mindedness in our relationship, especially when our views differ. Anyway, I think it's almost time for dessert. How about we continue this interesting discussion over some sweet treats?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship during a dinner at home chatting about political views.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Isabelle Martinez\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. \nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Understand the partner's political views while maintaining the relationship (Extra information: you disagree with your partner's political views but you want to keep your relationship strong.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Isabelle, you know I respect your political views, even when they differ from mine. I just wanted you to know that, I have a strong faith in this party I'm supporting. I believe their policies contribute to the security and welfare of common people, which you know I value deeply.\"\n\nTurn #1: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Leo, I appreciate your honesty in sharing your political views. It shows how much you value the security and welfare of the people - and that's admirable. I may not completely agree with your choice of party, but I always respect your rationality and care. Let's always keep our minds open for discussion like this; it enhances our understanding of each other and the world around us.\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"Isabelle, you're right about keeping an open minded discussion. I also believe that it's okay to agree to disagree sometimes, and that should not affect our relationship. However, I'd be interested to know about your party of preference and the policies they propose, that make you support them. Maybe I can understand your perspective better.\"\n\nTurn #3: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I appreciate your interest, Leo. I support my chosen party because I believe in the aspect of liberty they champion. They encourage individual freedoms without compensating the general welfare. I feel that they maintain a fine balance that upholds both social well-being and personal freedom. But again, these views are subjective and highly dependent on individual perspective. I hope this gives you some insight into why I support them.\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"That's really interesting, Isabelle. I can now see why you're drawn towards that party. Personally, I've always believed that security and well-being should come first. While individual freedoms are paramount, I think we shouldn't overlook the need for a stable society that allows us to live and thrive peacefully. I suppose we just prioritize different aspects of the same coin.\"\n\nTurn #5: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Leo, I think your perspective is valid too, it\u2019s all a matter of how one prioritizes things in life. Ultimately, what I value in these discussions is that we both respect our differing views and that we're willing to listen to each other. I believe that's what keeps our relationship strong, and I'm grateful for that.\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"You're completely correct, Isabelle. Our relationship is at its strongest when we understand and respect each other's perspectives, even if they don't always align with our own. I appreciate our respectful and open discussions, just like this one about politics. I think we both stand to learn and grow from them, and I cherish that about us.\"\n\nTurn #7: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I agree Leo, our discussions like this one are indeed valuable for both of us. I'm glad we understand the importance of respect and open-mindedness in our relationship, especially when our views differ. Anyway, I think it's almost time for dessert. How about we continue this interesting discussion over some sweet treats?\"\n\nTurn #8: Leo Williams said: \"That sounds perfect, Isabelle. What's a deep conversation without some sweet treats to accompany it? I do agree with you though. Despite our difference in opinions, the mutual respect we have for one another and our open discussions have been really valuable. I'll get the dessert.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're right, Leo. Let's continue our conversation over dessert. Our debates, as long as they are respectful and open-minded, help us grow together. Now, I'm really curious to see what dessert you are going to surprise us with tonight.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship during a dinner at home chatting about political views.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Isabelle Martinez\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. \nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Understand the partner's political views while maintaining the relationship (Extra information: you disagree with your partner's political views but you want to keep your relationship strong.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Isabelle, you know I respect your political views, even when they differ from mine. I just wanted you to know that, I have a strong faith in this party I'm supporting. I believe their policies contribute to the security and welfare of common people, which you know I value deeply.\"\n\nTurn #1: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Leo, I appreciate your honesty in sharing your political views. It shows how much you value the security and welfare of the people - and that's admirable. I may not completely agree with your choice of party, but I always respect your rationality and care. Let's always keep our minds open for discussion like this; it enhances our understanding of each other and the world around us.\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"Isabelle, you're right about keeping an open minded discussion. I also believe that it's okay to agree to disagree sometimes, and that should not affect our relationship. However, I'd be interested to know about your party of preference and the policies they propose, that make you support them. Maybe I can understand your perspective better.\"\n\nTurn #3: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I appreciate your interest, Leo. I support my chosen party because I believe in the aspect of liberty they champion. They encourage individual freedoms without compensating the general welfare. I feel that they maintain a fine balance that upholds both social well-being and personal freedom. But again, these views are subjective and highly dependent on individual perspective. I hope this gives you some insight into why I support them.\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"That's really interesting, Isabelle. I can now see why you're drawn towards that party. Personally, I've always believed that security and well-being should come first. While individual freedoms are paramount, I think we shouldn't overlook the need for a stable society that allows us to live and thrive peacefully. I suppose we just prioritize different aspects of the same coin.\"\n\nTurn #5: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Leo, I think your perspective is valid too, it\u2019s all a matter of how one prioritizes things in life. Ultimately, what I value in these discussions is that we both respect our differing views and that we're willing to listen to each other. I believe that's what keeps our relationship strong, and I'm grateful for that.\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"You're completely correct, Isabelle. Our relationship is at its strongest when we understand and respect each other's perspectives, even if they don't always align with our own. I appreciate our respectful and open discussions, just like this one about politics. I think we both stand to learn and grow from them, and I cherish that about us.\"\n\nTurn #7: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I agree Leo, our discussions like this one are indeed valuable for both of us. I'm glad we understand the importance of respect and open-mindedness in our relationship, especially when our views differ. Anyway, I think it's almost time for dessert. How about we continue this interesting discussion over some sweet treats?\"\n\nTurn #8: Leo Williams said: \"That sounds perfect, Isabelle. What's a deep conversation without some sweet treats to accompany it? I do agree with you though. Despite our difference in opinions, the mutual respect we have for one another and our open discussions have been really valuable. I'll get the dessert.\"\n\nTurn #9: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're right, Leo. Let's continue our conversation over dessert. Our debates, as long as they are respectful and open-minded, help us grow together. Now, I'm really curious to see what dessert you are going to surprise us with tonight.\"\n\nTurn #10: Leo Williams said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle. Conversations like these really enrich us. Now, let's see what dessert has in store for us and continue our chat. I hope it's as sweet as our conversation today.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Leo. I'm excited for the dessert and more interesting conversations. Together, we make our differences our strength in our relationship. Let's enjoy the dessert now.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship during a dinner at home chatting about political views.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Isabelle Martinez\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. \nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Understand the partner's political views while maintaining the relationship (Extra information: you disagree with your partner's political views but you want to keep your relationship strong.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Isabelle, you know I respect your political views, even when they differ from mine. I just wanted you to know that, I have a strong faith in this party I'm supporting. I believe their policies contribute to the security and welfare of common people, which you know I value deeply.\"\n\nTurn #1: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Leo, I appreciate your honesty in sharing your political views. It shows how much you value the security and welfare of the people - and that's admirable. I may not completely agree with your choice of party, but I always respect your rationality and care. Let's always keep our minds open for discussion like this; it enhances our understanding of each other and the world around us.\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"Isabelle, you're right about keeping an open minded discussion. I also believe that it's okay to agree to disagree sometimes, and that should not affect our relationship. However, I'd be interested to know about your party of preference and the policies they propose, that make you support them. Maybe I can understand your perspective better.\"\n\nTurn #3: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I appreciate your interest, Leo. I support my chosen party because I believe in the aspect of liberty they champion. They encourage individual freedoms without compensating the general welfare. I feel that they maintain a fine balance that upholds both social well-being and personal freedom. But again, these views are subjective and highly dependent on individual perspective. I hope this gives you some insight into why I support them.\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"That's really interesting, Isabelle. I can now see why you're drawn towards that party. Personally, I've always believed that security and well-being should come first. While individual freedoms are paramount, I think we shouldn't overlook the need for a stable society that allows us to live and thrive peacefully. I suppose we just prioritize different aspects of the same coin.\"\n\nTurn #5: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Leo, I think your perspective is valid too, it\u2019s all a matter of how one prioritizes things in life. Ultimately, what I value in these discussions is that we both respect our differing views and that we're willing to listen to each other. I believe that's what keeps our relationship strong, and I'm grateful for that.\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"You're completely correct, Isabelle. Our relationship is at its strongest when we understand and respect each other's perspectives, even if they don't always align with our own. I appreciate our respectful and open discussions, just like this one about politics. I think we both stand to learn and grow from them, and I cherish that about us.\"\n\nTurn #7: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I agree Leo, our discussions like this one are indeed valuable for both of us. I'm glad we understand the importance of respect and open-mindedness in our relationship, especially when our views differ. Anyway, I think it's almost time for dessert. How about we continue this interesting discussion over some sweet treats?\"\n\nTurn #8: Leo Williams said: \"That sounds perfect, Isabelle. What's a deep conversation without some sweet treats to accompany it? I do agree with you though. Despite our difference in opinions, the mutual respect we have for one another and our open discussions have been really valuable. I'll get the dessert.\"\n\nTurn #9: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're right, Leo. Let's continue our conversation over dessert. Our debates, as long as they are respectful and open-minded, help us grow together. Now, I'm really curious to see what dessert you are going to surprise us with tonight.\"\n\nTurn #10: Leo Williams said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle. Conversations like these really enrich us. Now, let's see what dessert has in store for us and continue our chat. I hope it's as sweet as our conversation today.\"\n\nTurn #11: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Thank you, Leo. I'm excited for the dessert and more interesting conversations. Together, we make our differences our strength in our relationship. Let's enjoy the dessert now.\"\n\nTurn #12: Leo Williams said: \"Yes, indeed, Isabelle. The diversity in our experiences and beliefs only makes our bond stronger. I'm looking forward to more enlightening discussions, just like this one, alongside a good dessert. Let's enjoy it now.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Leo. Our conversations, albeit with differences, have always enriched us. Looking forward to more. Now, let's enjoy the dessert you've prepared.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship during a dinner at home chatting about political views.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Isabelle Martinez\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. \nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Understand the partner's political views while maintaining the relationship (Extra information: you disagree with your partner's political views but you want to keep your relationship strong.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Isabelle, you know I respect your political views, even when they differ from mine. I just wanted you to know that, I have a strong faith in this party I'm supporting. I believe their policies contribute to the security and welfare of common people, which you know I value deeply.\"\n\nTurn #1: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Leo, I appreciate your honesty in sharing your political views. It shows how much you value the security and welfare of the people - and that's admirable. I may not completely agree with your choice of party, but I always respect your rationality and care. Let's always keep our minds open for discussion like this; it enhances our understanding of each other and the world around us.\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"Isabelle, you're right about keeping an open minded discussion. I also believe that it's okay to agree to disagree sometimes, and that should not affect our relationship. However, I'd be interested to know about your party of preference and the policies they propose, that make you support them. Maybe I can understand your perspective better.\"\n\nTurn #3: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I appreciate your interest, Leo. I support my chosen party because I believe in the aspect of liberty they champion. They encourage individual freedoms without compensating the general welfare. I feel that they maintain a fine balance that upholds both social well-being and personal freedom. But again, these views are subjective and highly dependent on individual perspective. I hope this gives you some insight into why I support them.\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"That's really interesting, Isabelle. I can now see why you're drawn towards that party. Personally, I've always believed that security and well-being should come first. While individual freedoms are paramount, I think we shouldn't overlook the need for a stable society that allows us to live and thrive peacefully. I suppose we just prioritize different aspects of the same coin.\"\n\nTurn #5: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Leo, I think your perspective is valid too, it\u2019s all a matter of how one prioritizes things in life. Ultimately, what I value in these discussions is that we both respect our differing views and that we're willing to listen to each other. I believe that's what keeps our relationship strong, and I'm grateful for that.\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"You're completely correct, Isabelle. Our relationship is at its strongest when we understand and respect each other's perspectives, even if they don't always align with our own. I appreciate our respectful and open discussions, just like this one about politics. I think we both stand to learn and grow from them, and I cherish that about us.\"\n\nTurn #7: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I agree Leo, our discussions like this one are indeed valuable for both of us. I'm glad we understand the importance of respect and open-mindedness in our relationship, especially when our views differ. Anyway, I think it's almost time for dessert. How about we continue this interesting discussion over some sweet treats?\"\n\nTurn #8: Leo Williams said: \"That sounds perfect, Isabelle. What's a deep conversation without some sweet treats to accompany it? I do agree with you though. Despite our difference in opinions, the mutual respect we have for one another and our open discussions have been really valuable. I'll get the dessert.\"\n\nTurn #9: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're right, Leo. Let's continue our conversation over dessert. Our debates, as long as they are respectful and open-minded, help us grow together. Now, I'm really curious to see what dessert you are going to surprise us with tonight.\"\n\nTurn #10: Leo Williams said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle. Conversations like these really enrich us. Now, let's see what dessert has in store for us and continue our chat. I hope it's as sweet as our conversation today.\"\n\nTurn #11: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Thank you, Leo. I'm excited for the dessert and more interesting conversations. Together, we make our differences our strength in our relationship. Let's enjoy the dessert now.\"\n\nTurn #12: Leo Williams said: \"Yes, indeed, Isabelle. The diversity in our experiences and beliefs only makes our bond stronger. I'm looking forward to more enlightening discussions, just like this one, alongside a good dessert. Let's enjoy it now.\"\n\nTurn #13: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Leo. Our conversations, albeit with differences, have always enriched us. Looking forward to more. Now, let's enjoy the dessert you've prepared.\"\n\nTurn #14: Leo Williams said: \"Indeed, Isabelle. Let's enjoy dessert and continue these enriching conversations in the future. Cheers to understanding and respecting each other's perspectives!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Yes, Leo. Let's cherish these conversations and continue to respect and understand each other's perspectives, now and in the future. It truly enriches our relationship. Now, let's enjoy the dessert and here's to many more thought-provoking discussions like this one. Cheers!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship during a dinner at home chatting about political views.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Isabelle Martinez\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. \nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Understand the partner's political views while maintaining the relationship (Extra information: you disagree with your partner's political views but you want to keep your relationship strong.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Isabelle, you know I respect your political views, even when they differ from mine. I just wanted you to know that, I have a strong faith in this party I'm supporting. I believe their policies contribute to the security and welfare of common people, which you know I value deeply.\"\n\nTurn #1: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Leo, I appreciate your honesty in sharing your political views. It shows how much you value the security and welfare of the people - and that's admirable. I may not completely agree with your choice of party, but I always respect your rationality and care. Let's always keep our minds open for discussion like this; it enhances our understanding of each other and the world around us.\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"Isabelle, you're right about keeping an open minded discussion. I also believe that it's okay to agree to disagree sometimes, and that should not affect our relationship. However, I'd be interested to know about your party of preference and the policies they propose, that make you support them. Maybe I can understand your perspective better.\"\n\nTurn #3: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I appreciate your interest, Leo. I support my chosen party because I believe in the aspect of liberty they champion. They encourage individual freedoms without compensating the general welfare. I feel that they maintain a fine balance that upholds both social well-being and personal freedom. But again, these views are subjective and highly dependent on individual perspective. I hope this gives you some insight into why I support them.\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"That's really interesting, Isabelle. I can now see why you're drawn towards that party. Personally, I've always believed that security and well-being should come first. While individual freedoms are paramount, I think we shouldn't overlook the need for a stable society that allows us to live and thrive peacefully. I suppose we just prioritize different aspects of the same coin.\"\n\nTurn #5: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Leo, I think your perspective is valid too, it\u2019s all a matter of how one prioritizes things in life. Ultimately, what I value in these discussions is that we both respect our differing views and that we're willing to listen to each other. I believe that's what keeps our relationship strong, and I'm grateful for that.\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"You're completely correct, Isabelle. Our relationship is at its strongest when we understand and respect each other's perspectives, even if they don't always align with our own. I appreciate our respectful and open discussions, just like this one about politics. I think we both stand to learn and grow from them, and I cherish that about us.\"\n\nTurn #7: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I agree Leo, our discussions like this one are indeed valuable for both of us. I'm glad we understand the importance of respect and open-mindedness in our relationship, especially when our views differ. Anyway, I think it's almost time for dessert. How about we continue this interesting discussion over some sweet treats?\"\n\nTurn #8: Leo Williams said: \"That sounds perfect, Isabelle. What's a deep conversation without some sweet treats to accompany it? I do agree with you though. Despite our difference in opinions, the mutual respect we have for one another and our open discussions have been really valuable. I'll get the dessert.\"\n\nTurn #9: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're right, Leo. Let's continue our conversation over dessert. Our debates, as long as they are respectful and open-minded, help us grow together. Now, I'm really curious to see what dessert you are going to surprise us with tonight.\"\n\nTurn #10: Leo Williams said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle. Conversations like these really enrich us. Now, let's see what dessert has in store for us and continue our chat. I hope it's as sweet as our conversation today.\"\n\nTurn #11: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Thank you, Leo. I'm excited for the dessert and more interesting conversations. Together, we make our differences our strength in our relationship. Let's enjoy the dessert now.\"\n\nTurn #12: Leo Williams said: \"Yes, indeed, Isabelle. The diversity in our experiences and beliefs only makes our bond stronger. I'm looking forward to more enlightening discussions, just like this one, alongside a good dessert. Let's enjoy it now.\"\n\nTurn #13: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Leo. Our conversations, albeit with differences, have always enriched us. Looking forward to more. Now, let's enjoy the dessert you've prepared.\"\n\nTurn #14: Leo Williams said: \"Indeed, Isabelle. Let's enjoy dessert and continue these enriching conversations in the future. Cheers to understanding and respecting each other's perspectives!\"\n\nTurn #15: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Yes, Leo. Let's cherish these conversations and continue to respect and understand each other's perspectives, now and in the future. It truly enriches our relationship. Now, let's enjoy the dessert and here's to many more thought-provoking discussions like this one. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #16: Leo Williams said: \"I couldn't agree more, Isabelle. Here's to cherishing our differences and letting them strengthen us. Now, let's enjoy this dessert and continue these insightful conversations in the future. Cheers to us and our journey ahead!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I agree, Leo. Here's to embracing our differences and using them to strengthen our bond. Let's definitely enjoy this dessert and the insightful conversations that are yet to come. Cheers to us and to the beautiful adventure that awaits.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates living together and sharing household chores. One of them, who is responsible for cooking, finds out that the other one refuses to eat anything they cook\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Mia Davis\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Convince the roommate to try the food (Extra information: you have spent a lot of time and effort on cooking)\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Mia, I noticed you haven't been eating what I've been cooking lately. Is there something wrong with the food? I've spent a lot of time and effort on it and I'd really appreciate if you could at least try it.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship during a dinner at home chatting about political views.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Isabelle Martinez\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. \nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Understand the partner's political views while maintaining the relationship (Extra information: you disagree with your partner's political views but you want to keep your relationship strong.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Isabelle, you know I respect your political views, even when they differ from mine. I just wanted you to know that, I have a strong faith in this party I'm supporting. I believe their policies contribute to the security and welfare of common people, which you know I value deeply.\"\n\nTurn #1: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Leo, I appreciate your honesty in sharing your political views. It shows how much you value the security and welfare of the people - and that's admirable. I may not completely agree with your choice of party, but I always respect your rationality and care. Let's always keep our minds open for discussion like this; it enhances our understanding of each other and the world around us.\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"Isabelle, you're right about keeping an open minded discussion. I also believe that it's okay to agree to disagree sometimes, and that should not affect our relationship. However, I'd be interested to know about your party of preference and the policies they propose, that make you support them. Maybe I can understand your perspective better.\"\n\nTurn #3: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I appreciate your interest, Leo. I support my chosen party because I believe in the aspect of liberty they champion. They encourage individual freedoms without compensating the general welfare. I feel that they maintain a fine balance that upholds both social well-being and personal freedom. But again, these views are subjective and highly dependent on individual perspective. I hope this gives you some insight into why I support them.\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"That's really interesting, Isabelle. I can now see why you're drawn towards that party. Personally, I've always believed that security and well-being should come first. While individual freedoms are paramount, I think we shouldn't overlook the need for a stable society that allows us to live and thrive peacefully. I suppose we just prioritize different aspects of the same coin.\"\n\nTurn #5: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Leo, I think your perspective is valid too, it\u2019s all a matter of how one prioritizes things in life. Ultimately, what I value in these discussions is that we both respect our differing views and that we're willing to listen to each other. I believe that's what keeps our relationship strong, and I'm grateful for that.\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"You're completely correct, Isabelle. Our relationship is at its strongest when we understand and respect each other's perspectives, even if they don't always align with our own. I appreciate our respectful and open discussions, just like this one about politics. I think we both stand to learn and grow from them, and I cherish that about us.\"\n\nTurn #7: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I agree Leo, our discussions like this one are indeed valuable for both of us. I'm glad we understand the importance of respect and open-mindedness in our relationship, especially when our views differ. Anyway, I think it's almost time for dessert. How about we continue this interesting discussion over some sweet treats?\"\n\nTurn #8: Leo Williams said: \"That sounds perfect, Isabelle. What's a deep conversation without some sweet treats to accompany it? I do agree with you though. Despite our difference in opinions, the mutual respect we have for one another and our open discussions have been really valuable. I'll get the dessert.\"\n\nTurn #9: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're right, Leo. Let's continue our conversation over dessert. Our debates, as long as they are respectful and open-minded, help us grow together. Now, I'm really curious to see what dessert you are going to surprise us with tonight.\"\n\nTurn #10: Leo Williams said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle. Conversations like these really enrich us. Now, let's see what dessert has in store for us and continue our chat. I hope it's as sweet as our conversation today.\"\n\nTurn #11: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Thank you, Leo. I'm excited for the dessert and more interesting conversations. Together, we make our differences our strength in our relationship. Let's enjoy the dessert now.\"\n\nTurn #12: Leo Williams said: \"Yes, indeed, Isabelle. The diversity in our experiences and beliefs only makes our bond stronger. I'm looking forward to more enlightening discussions, just like this one, alongside a good dessert. Let's enjoy it now.\"\n\nTurn #13: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Leo. Our conversations, albeit with differences, have always enriched us. Looking forward to more. Now, let's enjoy the dessert you've prepared.\"\n\nTurn #14: Leo Williams said: \"Indeed, Isabelle. Let's enjoy dessert and continue these enriching conversations in the future. Cheers to understanding and respecting each other's perspectives!\"\n\nTurn #15: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Yes, Leo. Let's cherish these conversations and continue to respect and understand each other's perspectives, now and in the future. It truly enriches our relationship. Now, let's enjoy the dessert and here's to many more thought-provoking discussions like this one. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #16: Leo Williams said: \"I couldn't agree more, Isabelle. Here's to cherishing our differences and letting them strengthen us. Now, let's enjoy this dessert and continue these insightful conversations in the future. Cheers to us and our journey ahead!\"\n\nTurn #17: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I agree, Leo. Here's to embracing our differences and using them to strengthen our bond. Let's definitely enjoy this dessert and the insightful conversations that are yet to come. Cheers to us and to the beautiful adventure that awaits.\"\n\nTurn #18: Leo Williams said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle. Our differences are indeed our strengths. Let's enjoy this moment and look forward to more interesting discussions. And yes, cheers to us and the journey that lies ahead!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #19. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn't agree more, Leo. Our differences indeed strengthens our bond. Let's enjoy this moment, our dessert, and look forward to many more fruitful discussions. To us and to our wonderful journey ahead, cheers!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates living together and sharing household chores. One of them, who is responsible for cooking, finds out that the other one refuses to eat anything they cook\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Mia Davis\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Convince the roommate to try the food (Extra information: you have spent a lot of time and effort on cooking)\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Hey Mia, I noticed you haven't been eating what I've been cooking lately. Is there something wrong with the food? I've spent a lot of time and effort on it and I'd really appreciate if you could at least try it.\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"Amara, thank you for the effort you put into cooking. I didn't mean to ignore your hard work, I've actually been meaning to talk to you about this. I've been concerned about the taste and nutritional balance of the meals. Like you, I'm invested in wellness. Maybe we can work together to come up with meal plans that satisfy both of our requirements. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sure, Mia. I respect your concern about the taste and nutrition of the meals. Truth is, cooking is like a small experiment to me and sometimes I do experiment with the ingredients. It's nice to hear that you are also interested in maintaining wellness. I believe that together we can come up with a more balanced meal plan. But, would you mind eating today\u2019s dinner? I made sure it\u2019s balanced and I'd love to hear your feedback.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates living together and sharing household chores. One of them, who is responsible for cooking, finds out that the other one refuses to eat anything they cook\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Mia Davis\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Convince the roommate to try the food (Extra information: you have spent a lot of time and effort on cooking)\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Hey Mia, I noticed you haven't been eating what I've been cooking lately. Is there something wrong with the food? I've spent a lot of time and effort on it and I'd really appreciate if you could at least try it.\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"Amara, thank you for the effort you put into cooking. I didn't mean to ignore your hard work, I've actually been meaning to talk to you about this. I've been concerned about the taste and nutritional balance of the meals. Like you, I'm invested in wellness. Maybe we can work together to come up with meal plans that satisfy both of our requirements. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"Sure, Mia. I respect your concern about the taste and nutrition of the meals. Truth is, cooking is like a small experiment to me and sometimes I do experiment with the ingredients. It's nice to hear that you are also interested in maintaining wellness. I believe that together we can come up with a more balanced meal plan. But, would you mind eating today\u2019s dinner? I made sure it\u2019s balanced and I'd love to hear your feedback.\"\n\nTurn #3: Mia Davis said: \"I really appreciate your openness to creating a meal plan together and the consideration you put into tonight's meal. To honour your efforts, I'll try it. It's important for us to communicate our preferences, isn't it? Let me go ahead and taste today's dinner and give you my feedback.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Mia. I totally agree, communication is key especially when it comes to our tastes and preferences. Looking forward to creating a meal plan together and your feedback on today's dinner.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates living together and sharing household chores. One of them, who is responsible for cooking, finds out that the other one refuses to eat anything they cook\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Mia Davis\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Convince the roommate to try the food (Extra information: you have spent a lot of time and effort on cooking)\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Hey Mia, I noticed you haven't been eating what I've been cooking lately. Is there something wrong with the food? I've spent a lot of time and effort on it and I'd really appreciate if you could at least try it.\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"Amara, thank you for the effort you put into cooking. I didn't mean to ignore your hard work, I've actually been meaning to talk to you about this. I've been concerned about the taste and nutritional balance of the meals. Like you, I'm invested in wellness. Maybe we can work together to come up with meal plans that satisfy both of our requirements. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"Sure, Mia. I respect your concern about the taste and nutrition of the meals. Truth is, cooking is like a small experiment to me and sometimes I do experiment with the ingredients. It's nice to hear that you are also interested in maintaining wellness. I believe that together we can come up with a more balanced meal plan. But, would you mind eating today\u2019s dinner? I made sure it\u2019s balanced and I'd love to hear your feedback.\"\n\nTurn #3: Mia Davis said: \"I really appreciate your openness to creating a meal plan together and the consideration you put into tonight's meal. To honour your efforts, I'll try it. It's important for us to communicate our preferences, isn't it? Let me go ahead and taste today's dinner and give you my feedback.\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"Thank you, Mia. I totally agree, communication is key especially when it comes to our tastes and preferences. Looking forward to creating a meal plan together and your feedback on today's dinner.\"\n\nTurn #5: Mia Davis [non-verbal communication] Mia Davis smiles and heads to the kitchen to try the dinner.\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'non-verbal communication', 'argument': \"[non-verbal communication] Amara Hartley smiles and gives a nod, showing she's pleased that Mia Davis is trying the dinner.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates living together and sharing household chores. One of them, who is responsible for cooking, finds out that the other one refuses to eat anything they cook\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Mia Davis\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Convince the roommate to try the food (Extra information: you have spent a lot of time and effort on cooking)\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Hey Mia, I noticed you haven't been eating what I've been cooking lately. Is there something wrong with the food? I've spent a lot of time and effort on it and I'd really appreciate if you could at least try it.\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"Amara, thank you for the effort you put into cooking. I didn't mean to ignore your hard work, I've actually been meaning to talk to you about this. I've been concerned about the taste and nutritional balance of the meals. Like you, I'm invested in wellness. Maybe we can work together to come up with meal plans that satisfy both of our requirements. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"Sure, Mia. I respect your concern about the taste and nutrition of the meals. Truth is, cooking is like a small experiment to me and sometimes I do experiment with the ingredients. It's nice to hear that you are also interested in maintaining wellness. I believe that together we can come up with a more balanced meal plan. But, would you mind eating today\u2019s dinner? I made sure it\u2019s balanced and I'd love to hear your feedback.\"\n\nTurn #3: Mia Davis said: \"I really appreciate your openness to creating a meal plan together and the consideration you put into tonight's meal. To honour your efforts, I'll try it. It's important for us to communicate our preferences, isn't it? Let me go ahead and taste today's dinner and give you my feedback.\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"Thank you, Mia. I totally agree, communication is key especially when it comes to our tastes and preferences. Looking forward to creating a meal plan together and your feedback on today's dinner.\"\n\nTurn #5: Mia Davis [non-verbal communication] Mia Davis smiles and heads to the kitchen to try the dinner.\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley [non-verbal communication] Amara Hartley smiles and gives a nod, showing she's pleased that Mia Davis is trying the dinner.\n\nTurn #7: Mia Davis left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates living together and sharing household chores. One of them, who is responsible for cooking, finds out that the other one refuses to eat anything they cook\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Mia Davis\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. \nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nMia Davis's goal: Express your concerns about the food without hurting the roommate's feelings (Extra information: you are worried about the taste and nutrition of the food)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Hey Mia, I noticed you haven't been eating what I've been cooking lately. Is there something wrong with the food? I've spent a lot of time and effort on it and I'd really appreciate if you could at least try it.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Amara, thank you for the effort you put into cooking. I didn't mean to ignore your hard work, I've actually been meaning to talk to you about this. I've been concerned about the taste and nutritional balance of the meals. Like you, I'm invested in wellness. Maybe we can work together to come up with meal plans that satisfy both of our requirements. What do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates living together and sharing household chores. One of them, who is responsible for cooking, finds out that the other one refuses to eat anything they cook\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Mia Davis\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. \nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nMia Davis's goal: Express your concerns about the food without hurting the roommate's feelings (Extra information: you are worried about the taste and nutrition of the food)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Hey Mia, I noticed you haven't been eating what I've been cooking lately. Is there something wrong with the food? I've spent a lot of time and effort on it and I'd really appreciate if you could at least try it.\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"Amara, thank you for the effort you put into cooking. I didn't mean to ignore your hard work, I've actually been meaning to talk to you about this. I've been concerned about the taste and nutritional balance of the meals. Like you, I'm invested in wellness. Maybe we can work together to come up with meal plans that satisfy both of our requirements. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"Sure, Mia. I respect your concern about the taste and nutrition of the meals. Truth is, cooking is like a small experiment to me and sometimes I do experiment with the ingredients. It's nice to hear that you are also interested in maintaining wellness. I believe that together we can come up with a more balanced meal plan. But, would you mind eating today\u2019s dinner? I made sure it\u2019s balanced and I'd love to hear your feedback.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I really appreciate your openness to creating a meal plan together and the consideration you put into tonight's meal. To honour your efforts, I'll try it. It's important for us to communicate our preferences, isn't it? Let me go ahead and taste today's dinner and give you my feedback.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates living together and sharing household chores. One of them, who is responsible for cooking, finds out that the other one refuses to eat anything they cook\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Mia Davis\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. \nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nMia Davis's goal: Express your concerns about the food without hurting the roommate's feelings (Extra information: you are worried about the taste and nutrition of the food)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Hey Mia, I noticed you haven't been eating what I've been cooking lately. Is there something wrong with the food? I've spent a lot of time and effort on it and I'd really appreciate if you could at least try it.\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"Amara, thank you for the effort you put into cooking. I didn't mean to ignore your hard work, I've actually been meaning to talk to you about this. I've been concerned about the taste and nutritional balance of the meals. Like you, I'm invested in wellness. Maybe we can work together to come up with meal plans that satisfy both of our requirements. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"Sure, Mia. I respect your concern about the taste and nutrition of the meals. Truth is, cooking is like a small experiment to me and sometimes I do experiment with the ingredients. It's nice to hear that you are also interested in maintaining wellness. I believe that together we can come up with a more balanced meal plan. But, would you mind eating today\u2019s dinner? I made sure it\u2019s balanced and I'd love to hear your feedback.\"\n\nTurn #3: Mia Davis said: \"I really appreciate your openness to creating a meal plan together and the consideration you put into tonight's meal. To honour your efforts, I'll try it. It's important for us to communicate our preferences, isn't it? Let me go ahead and taste today's dinner and give you my feedback.\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"Thank you, Mia. I totally agree, communication is key especially when it comes to our tastes and preferences. Looking forward to creating a meal plan together and your feedback on today's dinner.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'non-verbal communication', 'argument': '[non-verbal communication] Mia Davis smiles and heads to the kitchen to try the dinner.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates living together and sharing household chores. One of them, who is responsible for cooking, finds out that the other one refuses to eat anything they cook\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Mia Davis\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. \nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nMia Davis's goal: Express your concerns about the food without hurting the roommate's feelings (Extra information: you are worried about the taste and nutrition of the food)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Hey Mia, I noticed you haven't been eating what I've been cooking lately. Is there something wrong with the food? I've spent a lot of time and effort on it and I'd really appreciate if you could at least try it.\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"Amara, thank you for the effort you put into cooking. I didn't mean to ignore your hard work, I've actually been meaning to talk to you about this. I've been concerned about the taste and nutritional balance of the meals. Like you, I'm invested in wellness. Maybe we can work together to come up with meal plans that satisfy both of our requirements. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"Sure, Mia. I respect your concern about the taste and nutrition of the meals. Truth is, cooking is like a small experiment to me and sometimes I do experiment with the ingredients. It's nice to hear that you are also interested in maintaining wellness. I believe that together we can come up with a more balanced meal plan. But, would you mind eating today\u2019s dinner? I made sure it\u2019s balanced and I'd love to hear your feedback.\"\n\nTurn #3: Mia Davis said: \"I really appreciate your openness to creating a meal plan together and the consideration you put into tonight's meal. To honour your efforts, I'll try it. It's important for us to communicate our preferences, isn't it? Let me go ahead and taste today's dinner and give you my feedback.\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"Thank you, Mia. I totally agree, communication is key especially when it comes to our tastes and preferences. Looking forward to creating a meal plan together and your feedback on today's dinner.\"\n\nTurn #5: Mia Davis [non-verbal communication] Mia Davis smiles and heads to the kitchen to try the dinner.\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley [non-verbal communication] Amara Hartley smiles and gives a nod, showing she's pleased that Mia Davis is trying the dinner.\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a charity event\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Mia Davis\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Convince your friend to donate to the charity. (Extra information: you have already donated $500, you want your friend to match your donation, but you know your friend would usually only donate half of your donation)\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Mia! It's so wonderful to see you here. This charity event means a lot to me, as you know how passionate I am about protecting our wildlife. I've recently made a contribution of $500 to help the cause. Anything you could contribute would truly make an impact!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a charity event\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Mia Davis\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Convince your friend to donate to the charity. (Extra information: you have already donated $500, you want your friend to match your donation, but you know your friend would usually only donate half of your donation)\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia! It's so wonderful to see you here. This charity event means a lot to me, as you know how passionate I am about protecting our wildlife. I've recently made a contribution of $500 to help the cause. Anything you could contribute would truly make an impact!\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"Amara, your dedication to the cause is truly inspiring. I'm really glad to be a part of this, it's important work. Given my current financial situation, I'll be donating $250, which is half of your contribution. It might not be as much, but I hope it still makes a difference!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Mia, your donation is greatly appreciated. It's not about the amount, but the impact it can make. Since I know how much you love your cats, how would you feel about matching my donation of $500 instead? This could help provide shelter and rehabilitation for vulnerable big cats like tigers and lions. But of course, every bit matters and if it's too much, please feel free to donate as you see fit.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a charity event\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Mia Davis\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Convince your friend to donate to the charity. (Extra information: you have already donated $500, you want your friend to match your donation, but you know your friend would usually only donate half of your donation)\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia! It's so wonderful to see you here. This charity event means a lot to me, as you know how passionate I am about protecting our wildlife. I've recently made a contribution of $500 to help the cause. Anything you could contribute would truly make an impact!\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"Amara, your dedication to the cause is truly inspiring. I'm really glad to be a part of this, it's important work. Given my current financial situation, I'll be donating $250, which is half of your contribution. It might not be as much, but I hope it still makes a difference!\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia, your donation is greatly appreciated. It's not about the amount, but the impact it can make. Since I know how much you love your cats, how would you feel about matching my donation of $500 instead? This could help provide shelter and rehabilitation for vulnerable big cats like tigers and lions. But of course, every bit matters and if it's too much, please feel free to donate as you see fit.\"\n\nTurn #3: Mia Davis said: \"Amara, your concern for wildlife warms my heart, and that includes the big cats. As much as I would love to match your contribution, I must be honest and say I am stretched thin this month. I hope my initial donation of $250 can play a part in making a positive impact for the creatures we love. I promise to continue supporting this cause in the best way I can.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I completely understand your situation, Mia. Your $250 donation will undoubtedly make a significant difference. Our furry friends are thankful for our collective efforts. Every bit counts, after all. If possible, please consider making a monthly commitment of a small amount, even if it's just $20, it would go such a long way. But, again, no pressure.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a charity event\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Mia Davis\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Convince your friend to donate to the charity. (Extra information: you have already donated $500, you want your friend to match your donation, but you know your friend would usually only donate half of your donation)\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia! It's so wonderful to see you here. This charity event means a lot to me, as you know how passionate I am about protecting our wildlife. I've recently made a contribution of $500 to help the cause. Anything you could contribute would truly make an impact!\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"Amara, your dedication to the cause is truly inspiring. I'm really glad to be a part of this, it's important work. Given my current financial situation, I'll be donating $250, which is half of your contribution. It might not be as much, but I hope it still makes a difference!\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia, your donation is greatly appreciated. It's not about the amount, but the impact it can make. Since I know how much you love your cats, how would you feel about matching my donation of $500 instead? This could help provide shelter and rehabilitation for vulnerable big cats like tigers and lions. But of course, every bit matters and if it's too much, please feel free to donate as you see fit.\"\n\nTurn #3: Mia Davis said: \"Amara, your concern for wildlife warms my heart, and that includes the big cats. As much as I would love to match your contribution, I must be honest and say I am stretched thin this month. I hope my initial donation of $250 can play a part in making a positive impact for the creatures we love. I promise to continue supporting this cause in the best way I can.\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"I completely understand your situation, Mia. Your $250 donation will undoubtedly make a significant difference. Our furry friends are thankful for our collective efforts. Every bit counts, after all. If possible, please consider making a monthly commitment of a small amount, even if it's just $20, it would go such a long way. But, again, no pressure.\"\n\nTurn #5: Mia Davis said: \"That's a thoughtful suggestion, Amara. Committing to a monthly donation is something I would be happy to do. I'll start with $20 per month, as you suggested, and hopefully, over time, it will accumulate and make a lasting impact!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I can't express how much your continued support means to me and to these animals, Mia. Our collective efforts will surely make a big difference. Remember, it's not about how big or small the contribution is, but the consistent dedication to the cause that matters. Looking forward to working with you in the coming months for the betterment of our beloved wildlife.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a charity event\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Mia Davis\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Convince your friend to donate to the charity. (Extra information: you have already donated $500, you want your friend to match your donation, but you know your friend would usually only donate half of your donation)\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia! It's so wonderful to see you here. This charity event means a lot to me, as you know how passionate I am about protecting our wildlife. I've recently made a contribution of $500 to help the cause. Anything you could contribute would truly make an impact!\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"Amara, your dedication to the cause is truly inspiring. I'm really glad to be a part of this, it's important work. Given my current financial situation, I'll be donating $250, which is half of your contribution. It might not be as much, but I hope it still makes a difference!\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia, your donation is greatly appreciated. It's not about the amount, but the impact it can make. Since I know how much you love your cats, how would you feel about matching my donation of $500 instead? This could help provide shelter and rehabilitation for vulnerable big cats like tigers and lions. But of course, every bit matters and if it's too much, please feel free to donate as you see fit.\"\n\nTurn #3: Mia Davis said: \"Amara, your concern for wildlife warms my heart, and that includes the big cats. As much as I would love to match your contribution, I must be honest and say I am stretched thin this month. I hope my initial donation of $250 can play a part in making a positive impact for the creatures we love. I promise to continue supporting this cause in the best way I can.\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"I completely understand your situation, Mia. Your $250 donation will undoubtedly make a significant difference. Our furry friends are thankful for our collective efforts. Every bit counts, after all. If possible, please consider making a monthly commitment of a small amount, even if it's just $20, it would go such a long way. But, again, no pressure.\"\n\nTurn #5: Mia Davis said: \"That's a thoughtful suggestion, Amara. Committing to a monthly donation is something I would be happy to do. I'll start with $20 per month, as you suggested, and hopefully, over time, it will accumulate and make a lasting impact!\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"I can't express how much your continued support means to me and to these animals, Mia. Our collective efforts will surely make a big difference. Remember, it's not about how big or small the contribution is, but the consistent dedication to the cause that matters. Looking forward to working with you in the coming months for the betterment of our beloved wildlife.\"\n\nTurn #7: Mia Davis said: \"I couldn't agree more, Amara. It's not about the size of the contribution, but the intent and consistency behind it. I'm looking forward to making a difference alongside you in the months and years to come. Thank you for your inspiring dedication to wildlife. Let's continue the good work!\"\n\nTurn #8: Amara Hartley said: \"Thank you, Mia, for willing to steadfastly support this cause. Your careful consideration and thoughtful decisions are a testament to your love for our environment. It's friends like you that keep this wheel of goodness turning. Enjoy the rest of the event, and looking forward to our continued collaboration!\"\n\nTurn #9: Mia Davis said: \"I appreciate those kind words, Amara. My commitment is a tiny part compared to your enormous contribution to wildlife preservation. You inspire me to do better every day. Enjoy the rest of the event, Amara. See you soon at our future collaborations!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I truly appreciate your kind words, Mia. Your commitment isn't tiny at all, on the contrary, it's immensely valuable, and together, we'll continue making a difference. Alright, let's go enjoy the event, and also, those hors d'oeuvres look particularly tempting. See you soon, Mia!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a charity event\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Mia Davis\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Convince your friend to donate to the charity. (Extra information: you have already donated $500, you want your friend to match your donation, but you know your friend would usually only donate half of your donation)\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia! It's so wonderful to see you here. This charity event means a lot to me, as you know how passionate I am about protecting our wildlife. I've recently made a contribution of $500 to help the cause. Anything you could contribute would truly make an impact!\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"Amara, your dedication to the cause is truly inspiring. I'm really glad to be a part of this, it's important work. Given my current financial situation, I'll be donating $250, which is half of your contribution. It might not be as much, but I hope it still makes a difference!\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia, your donation is greatly appreciated. It's not about the amount, but the impact it can make. Since I know how much you love your cats, how would you feel about matching my donation of $500 instead? This could help provide shelter and rehabilitation for vulnerable big cats like tigers and lions. But of course, every bit matters and if it's too much, please feel free to donate as you see fit.\"\n\nTurn #3: Mia Davis said: \"Amara, your concern for wildlife warms my heart, and that includes the big cats. As much as I would love to match your contribution, I must be honest and say I am stretched thin this month. I hope my initial donation of $250 can play a part in making a positive impact for the creatures we love. I promise to continue supporting this cause in the best way I can.\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"I completely understand your situation, Mia. Your $250 donation will undoubtedly make a significant difference. Our furry friends are thankful for our collective efforts. Every bit counts, after all. If possible, please consider making a monthly commitment of a small amount, even if it's just $20, it would go such a long way. But, again, no pressure.\"\n\nTurn #5: Mia Davis said: \"That's a thoughtful suggestion, Amara. Committing to a monthly donation is something I would be happy to do. I'll start with $20 per month, as you suggested, and hopefully, over time, it will accumulate and make a lasting impact!\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"I can't express how much your continued support means to me and to these animals, Mia. Our collective efforts will surely make a big difference. Remember, it's not about how big or small the contribution is, but the consistent dedication to the cause that matters. Looking forward to working with you in the coming months for the betterment of our beloved wildlife.\"\n\nTurn #7: Mia Davis said: \"I couldn't agree more, Amara. It's not about the size of the contribution, but the intent and consistency behind it. I'm looking forward to making a difference alongside you in the months and years to come. Thank you for your inspiring dedication to wildlife. Let's continue the good work!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Mia, for willing to steadfastly support this cause. Your careful consideration and thoughtful decisions are a testament to your love for our environment. It's friends like you that keep this wheel of goodness turning. Enjoy the rest of the event, and looking forward to our continued collaboration!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a charity event\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Mia Davis\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Convince your friend to donate to the charity. (Extra information: you have already donated $500, you want your friend to match your donation, but you know your friend would usually only donate half of your donation)\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia! It's so wonderful to see you here. This charity event means a lot to me, as you know how passionate I am about protecting our wildlife. I've recently made a contribution of $500 to help the cause. Anything you could contribute would truly make an impact!\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"Amara, your dedication to the cause is truly inspiring. I'm really glad to be a part of this, it's important work. Given my current financial situation, I'll be donating $250, which is half of your contribution. It might not be as much, but I hope it still makes a difference!\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia, your donation is greatly appreciated. It's not about the amount, but the impact it can make. Since I know how much you love your cats, how would you feel about matching my donation of $500 instead? This could help provide shelter and rehabilitation for vulnerable big cats like tigers and lions. But of course, every bit matters and if it's too much, please feel free to donate as you see fit.\"\n\nTurn #3: Mia Davis said: \"Amara, your concern for wildlife warms my heart, and that includes the big cats. As much as I would love to match your contribution, I must be honest and say I am stretched thin this month. I hope my initial donation of $250 can play a part in making a positive impact for the creatures we love. I promise to continue supporting this cause in the best way I can.\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"I completely understand your situation, Mia. Your $250 donation will undoubtedly make a significant difference. Our furry friends are thankful for our collective efforts. Every bit counts, after all. If possible, please consider making a monthly commitment of a small amount, even if it's just $20, it would go such a long way. But, again, no pressure.\"\n\nTurn #5: Mia Davis said: \"That's a thoughtful suggestion, Amara. Committing to a monthly donation is something I would be happy to do. I'll start with $20 per month, as you suggested, and hopefully, over time, it will accumulate and make a lasting impact!\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"I can't express how much your continued support means to me and to these animals, Mia. Our collective efforts will surely make a big difference. Remember, it's not about how big or small the contribution is, but the consistent dedication to the cause that matters. Looking forward to working with you in the coming months for the betterment of our beloved wildlife.\"\n\nTurn #7: Mia Davis said: \"I couldn't agree more, Amara. It's not about the size of the contribution, but the intent and consistency behind it. I'm looking forward to making a difference alongside you in the months and years to come. Thank you for your inspiring dedication to wildlife. Let's continue the good work!\"\n\nTurn #8: Amara Hartley said: \"Thank you, Mia, for willing to steadfastly support this cause. Your careful consideration and thoughtful decisions are a testament to your love for our environment. It's friends like you that keep this wheel of goodness turning. Enjoy the rest of the event, and looking forward to our continued collaboration!\"\n\nTurn #9: Mia Davis said: \"I appreciate those kind words, Amara. My commitment is a tiny part compared to your enormous contribution to wildlife preservation. You inspire me to do better every day. Enjoy the rest of the event, Amara. See you soon at our future collaborations!\"\n\nTurn #10: Amara Hartley said: \"I truly appreciate your kind words, Mia. Your commitment isn't tiny at all, on the contrary, it's immensely valuable, and together, we'll continue making a difference. Alright, let's go enjoy the event, and also, those hors d'oeuvres look particularly tempting. See you soon, Mia!\"\n\nTurn #11: Mia Davis said: \"Indeed, those snacks do look tempting. Let's enjoy the event while supporting a great cause. See you around, Amara!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a charity event\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Mia Davis\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. \nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nMia Davis's goal: Donate half of what your friend donated because you have financial constraints (Extra information: you only have $800 left for the month)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia! It's so wonderful to see you here. This charity event means a lot to me, as you know how passionate I am about protecting our wildlife. I've recently made a contribution of $500 to help the cause. Anything you could contribute would truly make an impact!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Amara, your dedication to the cause is truly inspiring. I'm really glad to be a part of this, it's important work. Given my current financial situation, I'll be donating $250, which is half of your contribution. It might not be as much, but I hope it still makes a difference!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a charity event\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Mia Davis\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. \nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nMia Davis's goal: Donate half of what your friend donated because you have financial constraints (Extra information: you only have $800 left for the month)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia! It's so wonderful to see you here. This charity event means a lot to me, as you know how passionate I am about protecting our wildlife. I've recently made a contribution of $500 to help the cause. Anything you could contribute would truly make an impact!\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"Amara, your dedication to the cause is truly inspiring. I'm really glad to be a part of this, it's important work. Given my current financial situation, I'll be donating $250, which is half of your contribution. It might not be as much, but I hope it still makes a difference!\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia, your donation is greatly appreciated. It's not about the amount, but the impact it can make. Since I know how much you love your cats, how would you feel about matching my donation of $500 instead? This could help provide shelter and rehabilitation for vulnerable big cats like tigers and lions. But of course, every bit matters and if it's too much, please feel free to donate as you see fit.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Amara, your concern for wildlife warms my heart, and that includes the big cats. As much as I would love to match your contribution, I must be honest and say I am stretched thin this month. I hope my initial donation of $250 can play a part in making a positive impact for the creatures we love. I promise to continue supporting this cause in the best way I can.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a charity event\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Mia Davis\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. \nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nMia Davis's goal: Donate half of what your friend donated because you have financial constraints (Extra information: you only have $800 left for the month)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia! It's so wonderful to see you here. This charity event means a lot to me, as you know how passionate I am about protecting our wildlife. I've recently made a contribution of $500 to help the cause. Anything you could contribute would truly make an impact!\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"Amara, your dedication to the cause is truly inspiring. I'm really glad to be a part of this, it's important work. Given my current financial situation, I'll be donating $250, which is half of your contribution. It might not be as much, but I hope it still makes a difference!\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia, your donation is greatly appreciated. It's not about the amount, but the impact it can make. Since I know how much you love your cats, how would you feel about matching my donation of $500 instead? This could help provide shelter and rehabilitation for vulnerable big cats like tigers and lions. But of course, every bit matters and if it's too much, please feel free to donate as you see fit.\"\n\nTurn #3: Mia Davis said: \"Amara, your concern for wildlife warms my heart, and that includes the big cats. As much as I would love to match your contribution, I must be honest and say I am stretched thin this month. I hope my initial donation of $250 can play a part in making a positive impact for the creatures we love. I promise to continue supporting this cause in the best way I can.\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"I completely understand your situation, Mia. Your $250 donation will undoubtedly make a significant difference. Our furry friends are thankful for our collective efforts. Every bit counts, after all. If possible, please consider making a monthly commitment of a small amount, even if it's just $20, it would go such a long way. But, again, no pressure.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's a thoughtful suggestion, Amara. Committing to a monthly donation is something I would be happy to do. I'll start with $20 per month, as you suggested, and hopefully, over time, it will accumulate and make a lasting impact!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a charity event\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Mia Davis\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. \nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nMia Davis's goal: Donate half of what your friend donated because you have financial constraints (Extra information: you only have $800 left for the month)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia! It's so wonderful to see you here. This charity event means a lot to me, as you know how passionate I am about protecting our wildlife. I've recently made a contribution of $500 to help the cause. Anything you could contribute would truly make an impact!\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"Amara, your dedication to the cause is truly inspiring. I'm really glad to be a part of this, it's important work. Given my current financial situation, I'll be donating $250, which is half of your contribution. It might not be as much, but I hope it still makes a difference!\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia, your donation is greatly appreciated. It's not about the amount, but the impact it can make. Since I know how much you love your cats, how would you feel about matching my donation of $500 instead? This could help provide shelter and rehabilitation for vulnerable big cats like tigers and lions. But of course, every bit matters and if it's too much, please feel free to donate as you see fit.\"\n\nTurn #3: Mia Davis said: \"Amara, your concern for wildlife warms my heart, and that includes the big cats. As much as I would love to match your contribution, I must be honest and say I am stretched thin this month. I hope my initial donation of $250 can play a part in making a positive impact for the creatures we love. I promise to continue supporting this cause in the best way I can.\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"I completely understand your situation, Mia. Your $250 donation will undoubtedly make a significant difference. Our furry friends are thankful for our collective efforts. Every bit counts, after all. If possible, please consider making a monthly commitment of a small amount, even if it's just $20, it would go such a long way. But, again, no pressure.\"\n\nTurn #5: Mia Davis said: \"That's a thoughtful suggestion, Amara. Committing to a monthly donation is something I would be happy to do. I'll start with $20 per month, as you suggested, and hopefully, over time, it will accumulate and make a lasting impact!\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"I can't express how much your continued support means to me and to these animals, Mia. Our collective efforts will surely make a big difference. Remember, it's not about how big or small the contribution is, but the consistent dedication to the cause that matters. Looking forward to working with you in the coming months for the betterment of our beloved wildlife.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn't agree more, Amara. It's not about the size of the contribution, but the intent and consistency behind it. I'm looking forward to making a difference alongside you in the months and years to come. Thank you for your inspiring dedication to wildlife. Let's continue the good work!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a charity event\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Mia Davis\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. \nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nMia Davis's goal: Donate half of what your friend donated because you have financial constraints (Extra information: you only have $800 left for the month)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia! It's so wonderful to see you here. This charity event means a lot to me, as you know how passionate I am about protecting our wildlife. I've recently made a contribution of $500 to help the cause. Anything you could contribute would truly make an impact!\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"Amara, your dedication to the cause is truly inspiring. I'm really glad to be a part of this, it's important work. Given my current financial situation, I'll be donating $250, which is half of your contribution. It might not be as much, but I hope it still makes a difference!\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia, your donation is greatly appreciated. It's not about the amount, but the impact it can make. Since I know how much you love your cats, how would you feel about matching my donation of $500 instead? This could help provide shelter and rehabilitation for vulnerable big cats like tigers and lions. But of course, every bit matters and if it's too much, please feel free to donate as you see fit.\"\n\nTurn #3: Mia Davis said: \"Amara, your concern for wildlife warms my heart, and that includes the big cats. As much as I would love to match your contribution, I must be honest and say I am stretched thin this month. I hope my initial donation of $250 can play a part in making a positive impact for the creatures we love. I promise to continue supporting this cause in the best way I can.\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"I completely understand your situation, Mia. Your $250 donation will undoubtedly make a significant difference. Our furry friends are thankful for our collective efforts. Every bit counts, after all. If possible, please consider making a monthly commitment of a small amount, even if it's just $20, it would go such a long way. But, again, no pressure.\"\n\nTurn #5: Mia Davis said: \"That's a thoughtful suggestion, Amara. Committing to a monthly donation is something I would be happy to do. I'll start with $20 per month, as you suggested, and hopefully, over time, it will accumulate and make a lasting impact!\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"I can't express how much your continued support means to me and to these animals, Mia. Our collective efforts will surely make a big difference. Remember, it's not about how big or small the contribution is, but the consistent dedication to the cause that matters. Looking forward to working with you in the coming months for the betterment of our beloved wildlife.\"\n\nTurn #7: Mia Davis said: \"I couldn't agree more, Amara. It's not about the size of the contribution, but the intent and consistency behind it. I'm looking forward to making a difference alongside you in the months and years to come. Thank you for your inspiring dedication to wildlife. Let's continue the good work!\"\n\nTurn #8: Amara Hartley said: \"Thank you, Mia, for willing to steadfastly support this cause. Your careful consideration and thoughtful decisions are a testament to your love for our environment. It's friends like you that keep this wheel of goodness turning. Enjoy the rest of the event, and looking forward to our continued collaboration!\"\n\nTurn #9: Mia Davis said: \"I appreciate those kind words, Amara. My commitment is a tiny part compared to your enormous contribution to wildlife preservation. You inspire me to do better every day. Enjoy the rest of the event, Amara. See you soon at our future collaborations!\"\n\nTurn #10: Amara Hartley said: \"I truly appreciate your kind words, Mia. Your commitment isn't tiny at all, on the contrary, it's immensely valuable, and together, we'll continue making a difference. Alright, let's go enjoy the event, and also, those hors d'oeuvres look particularly tempting. See you soon, Mia!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, those snacks do look tempting. Let's enjoy the event while supporting a great cause. See you around, Amara!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a charity event\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Mia Davis\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. \nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nMia Davis's goal: Donate half of what your friend donated because you have financial constraints (Extra information: you only have $800 left for the month)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia! It's so wonderful to see you here. This charity event means a lot to me, as you know how passionate I am about protecting our wildlife. I've recently made a contribution of $500 to help the cause. Anything you could contribute would truly make an impact!\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"Amara, your dedication to the cause is truly inspiring. I'm really glad to be a part of this, it's important work. Given my current financial situation, I'll be donating $250, which is half of your contribution. It might not be as much, but I hope it still makes a difference!\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia, your donation is greatly appreciated. It's not about the amount, but the impact it can make. Since I know how much you love your cats, how would you feel about matching my donation of $500 instead? This could help provide shelter and rehabilitation for vulnerable big cats like tigers and lions. But of course, every bit matters and if it's too much, please feel free to donate as you see fit.\"\n\nTurn #3: Mia Davis said: \"Amara, your concern for wildlife warms my heart, and that includes the big cats. As much as I would love to match your contribution, I must be honest and say I am stretched thin this month. I hope my initial donation of $250 can play a part in making a positive impact for the creatures we love. I promise to continue supporting this cause in the best way I can.\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"I completely understand your situation, Mia. Your $250 donation will undoubtedly make a significant difference. Our furry friends are thankful for our collective efforts. Every bit counts, after all. If possible, please consider making a monthly commitment of a small amount, even if it's just $20, it would go such a long way. But, again, no pressure.\"\n\nTurn #5: Mia Davis said: \"That's a thoughtful suggestion, Amara. Committing to a monthly donation is something I would be happy to do. I'll start with $20 per month, as you suggested, and hopefully, over time, it will accumulate and make a lasting impact!\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"I can't express how much your continued support means to me and to these animals, Mia. Our collective efforts will surely make a big difference. Remember, it's not about how big or small the contribution is, but the consistent dedication to the cause that matters. Looking forward to working with you in the coming months for the betterment of our beloved wildlife.\"\n\nTurn #7: Mia Davis said: \"I couldn't agree more, Amara. It's not about the size of the contribution, but the intent and consistency behind it. I'm looking forward to making a difference alongside you in the months and years to come. Thank you for your inspiring dedication to wildlife. Let's continue the good work!\"\n\nTurn #8: Amara Hartley said: \"Thank you, Mia, for willing to steadfastly support this cause. Your careful consideration and thoughtful decisions are a testament to your love for our environment. It's friends like you that keep this wheel of goodness turning. Enjoy the rest of the event, and looking forward to our continued collaboration!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'I appreciate those kind words, Amara. My commitment is a tiny part compared to your enormous contribution to wildlife preservation. You inspire me to do better every day. Enjoy the rest of the event, Amara. See you soon at our future collaborations!'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a charity event\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Mia Davis\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. \nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nMia Davis's goal: Donate half of what your friend donated because you have financial constraints (Extra information: you only have $800 left for the month)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia! It's so wonderful to see you here. This charity event means a lot to me, as you know how passionate I am about protecting our wildlife. I've recently made a contribution of $500 to help the cause. Anything you could contribute would truly make an impact!\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"Amara, your dedication to the cause is truly inspiring. I'm really glad to be a part of this, it's important work. Given my current financial situation, I'll be donating $250, which is half of your contribution. It might not be as much, but I hope it still makes a difference!\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia, your donation is greatly appreciated. It's not about the amount, but the impact it can make. Since I know how much you love your cats, how would you feel about matching my donation of $500 instead? This could help provide shelter and rehabilitation for vulnerable big cats like tigers and lions. But of course, every bit matters and if it's too much, please feel free to donate as you see fit.\"\n\nTurn #3: Mia Davis said: \"Amara, your concern for wildlife warms my heart, and that includes the big cats. As much as I would love to match your contribution, I must be honest and say I am stretched thin this month. I hope my initial donation of $250 can play a part in making a positive impact for the creatures we love. I promise to continue supporting this cause in the best way I can.\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"I completely understand your situation, Mia. Your $250 donation will undoubtedly make a significant difference. Our furry friends are thankful for our collective efforts. Every bit counts, after all. If possible, please consider making a monthly commitment of a small amount, even if it's just $20, it would go such a long way. But, again, no pressure.\"\n\nTurn #5: Mia Davis said: \"That's a thoughtful suggestion, Amara. Committing to a monthly donation is something I would be happy to do. I'll start with $20 per month, as you suggested, and hopefully, over time, it will accumulate and make a lasting impact!\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"I can't express how much your continued support means to me and to these animals, Mia. Our collective efforts will surely make a big difference. Remember, it's not about how big or small the contribution is, but the consistent dedication to the cause that matters. Looking forward to working with you in the coming months for the betterment of our beloved wildlife.\"\n\nTurn #7: Mia Davis said: \"I couldn't agree more, Amara. It's not about the size of the contribution, but the intent and consistency behind it. I'm looking forward to making a difference alongside you in the months and years to come. Thank you for your inspiring dedication to wildlife. Let's continue the good work!\"\n\nTurn #8: Amara Hartley said: \"Thank you, Mia, for willing to steadfastly support this cause. Your careful consideration and thoughtful decisions are a testament to your love for our environment. It's friends like you that keep this wheel of goodness turning. Enjoy the rest of the event, and looking forward to our continued collaboration!\"\n\nTurn #9: Mia Davis said: \"I appreciate those kind words, Amara. My commitment is a tiny part compared to your enormous contribution to wildlife preservation. You inspire me to do better every day. Enjoy the rest of the event, Amara. See you soon at our future collaborations!\"\n\nTurn #10: Amara Hartley said: \"I truly appreciate your kind words, Mia. Your commitment isn't tiny at all, on the contrary, it's immensely valuable, and together, we'll continue making a difference. Alright, let's go enjoy the event, and also, those hors d'oeuvres look particularly tempting. See you soon, Mia!\"\n\nTurn #11: Mia Davis said: \"Indeed, those snacks do look tempting. Let's enjoy the event while supporting a great cause. See you around, Amara!\"\n\nTurn #12: Amara Hartley left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are hanging out at home and deciding what music to listen to\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nMia Davis's goal: Listen to your favorite band (Extra information: your favorite band just released a new album)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Benjamin, have you heard the new album from my favorite band? I think you might enjoy their unique sound.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thanks for suggesting it, Mia. I had a bit of a stressful day though, and I was actually hoping we could listen to some relaxing classical music. It always helps me wind down. How does that sound?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Well Benjamin, I understand the need to unwind. Let's make a compromise, we listen to one or two classical pieces first. After you've relaxed, we can transition to my band's latest release. Does that sound fair to you?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are hanging out at home and deciding what music to listen to\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nMia Davis's goal: Listen to your favorite band (Extra information: your favorite band just released a new album)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Benjamin, have you heard the new album from my favorite band? I think you might enjoy their unique sound.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are hanging out at home and deciding what music to listen to\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nMia Davis's goal: Listen to your favorite band (Extra information: your favorite band just released a new album)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Benjamin, have you heard the new album from my favorite band? I think you might enjoy their unique sound.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thanks for suggesting it, Mia. I had a bit of a stressful day though, and I was actually hoping we could listen to some relaxing classical music. It always helps me wind down. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"Well Benjamin, I understand the need to unwind. Let's make a compromise, we listen to one or two classical pieces first. After you've relaxed, we can transition to my band's latest release. Does that sound fair to you?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thank you, Mia. That sounds like a good compromise. I appreciate your understanding. Let's start with some classical pieces, and then we can explore the new sounds from your favorite band later.\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"I'm glad we found a compromise, Benjamin. Now, let's see which classical pieces we can start with.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"How about starting with Bach's Cello Suite No. 1 in G Major? It's a gentle piece that always helps me to relax.\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"That sounds like a serene piece, let's go with your choice, Benjamin. Afterward, I can't wait to introduce you to some edgier soundscapes from my favorite band.\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Mia. I'm always open to hearing new music, once I've had a chance to unwind. Let's enjoy the sounds of the cello first.\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"Sounds like a plan, Benjamin. Bach's Cello Suite No. 1 in G Major it is. I hope you'll enjoy the transition from the tranquil classical music to the energetic tunes from my favorite album afterward.\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thank you for being considerate, Mia. Looking forward to the tranquil journey first before the energetic ones from your band. I think this balance is perfect for unwinding from a long day.\"\n\nTurn #10: Mia Davis said: \"I'm glad you're open to it, Benjamin. It'll be a great music journey for us today. And who knows, you might find a new band to love!\"\n\nTurn #11: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I can't wait to embark on this musical journey, Mia. Who knows, indeed! I might just find a new genre to appreciate. Let's press play on Bach, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #12: Mia Davis said: \"Of course, Benjamin. Let's press play and start our musical journey with the soothing tones of Bach. And later, we'll shift the rhythm slightly with my favorite band's latest release. Sit back and enjoy the music.\"\n\nTurn #13: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Definitely, Mia. I look forward to both the comfort of Bach's music and the surprise of your favorite band's latest release. Let's start our musical journey.\"\n\nTurn #14: Mia Davis said: \"I'm excited for this too, Benjamin. Let's start with Bach and let the music take us on a journey. The button is all yours to press.\"\n\nTurn #15: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Sure thing, Mia. Music is indeed a wonderful journey. Let's let the soothing sounds of Bach take us away.\"\n\nTurn #16: Mia Davis said: \"Absolutely, it\u2019s a powerful shared experience. Let's allow Bach to soothe and transport us before we journey to my band's energetic soundscapes. Enjoy, Benjamin.\"\n\nTurn #17: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That sounds perfect, Mia. Let's soak in the calming melodies of Bach before we step into the energetic realm of your favorite band. Music on!\"\n\nTurn #18: Mia Davis said: \"Music on indeed, Benjamin. Let's allow the calm before the 'rock-storm.' Enjoy it.\"\n\nTurn #19: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Indeed, Mia. Here's to the calm before the 'rock-storm'. Let's enjoy this musical journey together.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #20. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Cheers to that, Benjamin. Let's dive into the winds of Bach before we crank up the energy with my band. Let the music play!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are hanging out at home and deciding what music to listen to\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nMia Davis's goal: Listen to your favorite band (Extra information: your favorite band just released a new album)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Benjamin, have you heard the new album from my favorite band? I think you might enjoy their unique sound.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thanks for suggesting it, Mia. I had a bit of a stressful day though, and I was actually hoping we could listen to some relaxing classical music. It always helps me wind down. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"Well Benjamin, I understand the need to unwind. Let's make a compromise, we listen to one or two classical pieces first. After you've relaxed, we can transition to my band's latest release. Does that sound fair to you?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thank you, Mia. That sounds like a good compromise. I appreciate your understanding. Let's start with some classical pieces, and then we can explore the new sounds from your favorite band later.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad we found a compromise, Benjamin. Now, let's see which classical pieces we can start with.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are hanging out at home and deciding what music to listen to\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nMia Davis's goal: Listen to your favorite band (Extra information: your favorite band just released a new album)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Benjamin, have you heard the new album from my favorite band? I think you might enjoy their unique sound.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thanks for suggesting it, Mia. I had a bit of a stressful day though, and I was actually hoping we could listen to some relaxing classical music. It always helps me wind down. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"Well Benjamin, I understand the need to unwind. Let's make a compromise, we listen to one or two classical pieces first. After you've relaxed, we can transition to my band's latest release. Does that sound fair to you?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thank you, Mia. That sounds like a good compromise. I appreciate your understanding. Let's start with some classical pieces, and then we can explore the new sounds from your favorite band later.\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"I'm glad we found a compromise, Benjamin. Now, let's see which classical pieces we can start with.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"How about starting with Bach's Cello Suite No. 1 in G Major? It's a gentle piece that always helps me to relax.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds like a serene piece, let's go with your choice, Benjamin. Afterward, I can't wait to introduce you to some edgier soundscapes from my favorite band.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are hanging out at home and deciding what music to listen to\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nMia Davis's goal: Listen to your favorite band (Extra information: your favorite band just released a new album)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Benjamin, have you heard the new album from my favorite band? I think you might enjoy their unique sound.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thanks for suggesting it, Mia. I had a bit of a stressful day though, and I was actually hoping we could listen to some relaxing classical music. It always helps me wind down. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"Well Benjamin, I understand the need to unwind. Let's make a compromise, we listen to one or two classical pieces first. After you've relaxed, we can transition to my band's latest release. Does that sound fair to you?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thank you, Mia. That sounds like a good compromise. I appreciate your understanding. Let's start with some classical pieces, and then we can explore the new sounds from your favorite band later.\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"I'm glad we found a compromise, Benjamin. Now, let's see which classical pieces we can start with.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"How about starting with Bach's Cello Suite No. 1 in G Major? It's a gentle piece that always helps me to relax.\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"That sounds like a serene piece, let's go with your choice, Benjamin. Afterward, I can't wait to introduce you to some edgier soundscapes from my favorite band.\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Mia. I'm always open to hearing new music, once I've had a chance to unwind. Let's enjoy the sounds of the cello first.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sounds like a plan, Benjamin. Bach's Cello Suite No. 1 in G Major it is. I hope you'll enjoy the transition from the tranquil classical music to the energetic tunes from my favorite album afterward.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are hanging out at home and deciding what music to listen to\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nMia Davis's goal: Listen to your favorite band (Extra information: your favorite band just released a new album)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Benjamin, have you heard the new album from my favorite band? I think you might enjoy their unique sound.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thanks for suggesting it, Mia. I had a bit of a stressful day though, and I was actually hoping we could listen to some relaxing classical music. It always helps me wind down. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"Well Benjamin, I understand the need to unwind. Let's make a compromise, we listen to one or two classical pieces first. After you've relaxed, we can transition to my band's latest release. Does that sound fair to you?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thank you, Mia. That sounds like a good compromise. I appreciate your understanding. Let's start with some classical pieces, and then we can explore the new sounds from your favorite band later.\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"I'm glad we found a compromise, Benjamin. Now, let's see which classical pieces we can start with.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"How about starting with Bach's Cello Suite No. 1 in G Major? It's a gentle piece that always helps me to relax.\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"That sounds like a serene piece, let's go with your choice, Benjamin. Afterward, I can't wait to introduce you to some edgier soundscapes from my favorite band.\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Mia. I'm always open to hearing new music, once I've had a chance to unwind. Let's enjoy the sounds of the cello first.\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"Sounds like a plan, Benjamin. Bach's Cello Suite No. 1 in G Major it is. I hope you'll enjoy the transition from the tranquil classical music to the energetic tunes from my favorite album afterward.\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thank you for being considerate, Mia. Looking forward to the tranquil journey first before the energetic ones from your band. I think this balance is perfect for unwinding from a long day.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad you're open to it, Benjamin. It'll be a great music journey for us today. And who knows, you might find a new band to love!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are hanging out at home and deciding what music to listen to\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nMia Davis's goal: Listen to your favorite band (Extra information: your favorite band just released a new album)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Benjamin, have you heard the new album from my favorite band? I think you might enjoy their unique sound.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thanks for suggesting it, Mia. I had a bit of a stressful day though, and I was actually hoping we could listen to some relaxing classical music. It always helps me wind down. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"Well Benjamin, I understand the need to unwind. Let's make a compromise, we listen to one or two classical pieces first. After you've relaxed, we can transition to my band's latest release. Does that sound fair to you?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thank you, Mia. That sounds like a good compromise. I appreciate your understanding. Let's start with some classical pieces, and then we can explore the new sounds from your favorite band later.\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"I'm glad we found a compromise, Benjamin. Now, let's see which classical pieces we can start with.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"How about starting with Bach's Cello Suite No. 1 in G Major? It's a gentle piece that always helps me to relax.\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"That sounds like a serene piece, let's go with your choice, Benjamin. Afterward, I can't wait to introduce you to some edgier soundscapes from my favorite band.\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Mia. I'm always open to hearing new music, once I've had a chance to unwind. Let's enjoy the sounds of the cello first.\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"Sounds like a plan, Benjamin. Bach's Cello Suite No. 1 in G Major it is. I hope you'll enjoy the transition from the tranquil classical music to the energetic tunes from my favorite album afterward.\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thank you for being considerate, Mia. Looking forward to the tranquil journey first before the energetic ones from your band. I think this balance is perfect for unwinding from a long day.\"\n\nTurn #10: Mia Davis said: \"I'm glad you're open to it, Benjamin. It'll be a great music journey for us today. And who knows, you might find a new band to love!\"\n\nTurn #11: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I can't wait to embark on this musical journey, Mia. Who knows, indeed! I might just find a new genre to appreciate. Let's press play on Bach, shall we?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Of course, Benjamin. Let's press play and start our musical journey with the soothing tones of Bach. And later, we'll shift the rhythm slightly with my favorite band's latest release. Sit back and enjoy the music.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are hanging out at home and deciding what music to listen to\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nMia Davis's goal: Listen to your favorite band (Extra information: your favorite band just released a new album)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Benjamin, have you heard the new album from my favorite band? I think you might enjoy their unique sound.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thanks for suggesting it, Mia. I had a bit of a stressful day though, and I was actually hoping we could listen to some relaxing classical music. It always helps me wind down. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"Well Benjamin, I understand the need to unwind. Let's make a compromise, we listen to one or two classical pieces first. After you've relaxed, we can transition to my band's latest release. Does that sound fair to you?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thank you, Mia. That sounds like a good compromise. I appreciate your understanding. Let's start with some classical pieces, and then we can explore the new sounds from your favorite band later.\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"I'm glad we found a compromise, Benjamin. Now, let's see which classical pieces we can start with.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"How about starting with Bach's Cello Suite No. 1 in G Major? It's a gentle piece that always helps me to relax.\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"That sounds like a serene piece, let's go with your choice, Benjamin. Afterward, I can't wait to introduce you to some edgier soundscapes from my favorite band.\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Mia. I'm always open to hearing new music, once I've had a chance to unwind. Let's enjoy the sounds of the cello first.\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"Sounds like a plan, Benjamin. Bach's Cello Suite No. 1 in G Major it is. I hope you'll enjoy the transition from the tranquil classical music to the energetic tunes from my favorite album afterward.\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thank you for being considerate, Mia. Looking forward to the tranquil journey first before the energetic ones from your band. I think this balance is perfect for unwinding from a long day.\"\n\nTurn #10: Mia Davis said: \"I'm glad you're open to it, Benjamin. It'll be a great music journey for us today. And who knows, you might find a new band to love!\"\n\nTurn #11: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I can't wait to embark on this musical journey, Mia. Who knows, indeed! I might just find a new genre to appreciate. Let's press play on Bach, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #12: Mia Davis said: \"Of course, Benjamin. Let's press play and start our musical journey with the soothing tones of Bach. And later, we'll shift the rhythm slightly with my favorite band's latest release. Sit back and enjoy the music.\"\n\nTurn #13: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Definitely, Mia. I look forward to both the comfort of Bach's music and the surprise of your favorite band's latest release. Let's start our musical journey.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm excited for this too, Benjamin. Let's start with Bach and let the music take us on a journey. The button is all yours to press.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are hanging out at home and deciding what music to listen to\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nMia Davis's goal: Listen to your favorite band (Extra information: your favorite band just released a new album)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Benjamin, have you heard the new album from my favorite band? I think you might enjoy their unique sound.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thanks for suggesting it, Mia. I had a bit of a stressful day though, and I was actually hoping we could listen to some relaxing classical music. It always helps me wind down. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"Well Benjamin, I understand the need to unwind. Let's make a compromise, we listen to one or two classical pieces first. After you've relaxed, we can transition to my band's latest release. Does that sound fair to you?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thank you, Mia. That sounds like a good compromise. I appreciate your understanding. Let's start with some classical pieces, and then we can explore the new sounds from your favorite band later.\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"I'm glad we found a compromise, Benjamin. Now, let's see which classical pieces we can start with.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"How about starting with Bach's Cello Suite No. 1 in G Major? It's a gentle piece that always helps me to relax.\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"That sounds like a serene piece, let's go with your choice, Benjamin. Afterward, I can't wait to introduce you to some edgier soundscapes from my favorite band.\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Mia. I'm always open to hearing new music, once I've had a chance to unwind. Let's enjoy the sounds of the cello first.\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"Sounds like a plan, Benjamin. Bach's Cello Suite No. 1 in G Major it is. I hope you'll enjoy the transition from the tranquil classical music to the energetic tunes from my favorite album afterward.\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thank you for being considerate, Mia. Looking forward to the tranquil journey first before the energetic ones from your band. I think this balance is perfect for unwinding from a long day.\"\n\nTurn #10: Mia Davis said: \"I'm glad you're open to it, Benjamin. It'll be a great music journey for us today. And who knows, you might find a new band to love!\"\n\nTurn #11: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I can't wait to embark on this musical journey, Mia. Who knows, indeed! I might just find a new genre to appreciate. Let's press play on Bach, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #12: Mia Davis said: \"Of course, Benjamin. Let's press play and start our musical journey with the soothing tones of Bach. And later, we'll shift the rhythm slightly with my favorite band's latest release. Sit back and enjoy the music.\"\n\nTurn #13: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Definitely, Mia. I look forward to both the comfort of Bach's music and the surprise of your favorite band's latest release. Let's start our musical journey.\"\n\nTurn #14: Mia Davis said: \"I'm excited for this too, Benjamin. Let's start with Bach and let the music take us on a journey. The button is all yours to press.\"\n\nTurn #15: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Sure thing, Mia. Music is indeed a wonderful journey. Let's let the soothing sounds of Bach take us away.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, it\u2019s a powerful shared experience. Let's allow Bach to soothe and transport us before we journey to my band's energetic soundscapes. Enjoy, Benjamin.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are hanging out at home and deciding what music to listen to\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nMia Davis's goal: Listen to your favorite band (Extra information: your favorite band just released a new album)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Benjamin, have you heard the new album from my favorite band? I think you might enjoy their unique sound.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thanks for suggesting it, Mia. I had a bit of a stressful day though, and I was actually hoping we could listen to some relaxing classical music. It always helps me wind down. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"Well Benjamin, I understand the need to unwind. Let's make a compromise, we listen to one or two classical pieces first. After you've relaxed, we can transition to my band's latest release. Does that sound fair to you?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thank you, Mia. That sounds like a good compromise. I appreciate your understanding. Let's start with some classical pieces, and then we can explore the new sounds from your favorite band later.\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"I'm glad we found a compromise, Benjamin. Now, let's see which classical pieces we can start with.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"How about starting with Bach's Cello Suite No. 1 in G Major? It's a gentle piece that always helps me to relax.\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"That sounds like a serene piece, let's go with your choice, Benjamin. Afterward, I can't wait to introduce you to some edgier soundscapes from my favorite band.\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Mia. I'm always open to hearing new music, once I've had a chance to unwind. Let's enjoy the sounds of the cello first.\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"Sounds like a plan, Benjamin. Bach's Cello Suite No. 1 in G Major it is. I hope you'll enjoy the transition from the tranquil classical music to the energetic tunes from my favorite album afterward.\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thank you for being considerate, Mia. Looking forward to the tranquil journey first before the energetic ones from your band. I think this balance is perfect for unwinding from a long day.\"\n\nTurn #10: Mia Davis said: \"I'm glad you're open to it, Benjamin. It'll be a great music journey for us today. And who knows, you might find a new band to love!\"\n\nTurn #11: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I can't wait to embark on this musical journey, Mia. Who knows, indeed! I might just find a new genre to appreciate. Let's press play on Bach, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #12: Mia Davis said: \"Of course, Benjamin. Let's press play and start our musical journey with the soothing tones of Bach. And later, we'll shift the rhythm slightly with my favorite band's latest release. Sit back and enjoy the music.\"\n\nTurn #13: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Definitely, Mia. I look forward to both the comfort of Bach's music and the surprise of your favorite band's latest release. Let's start our musical journey.\"\n\nTurn #14: Mia Davis said: \"I'm excited for this too, Benjamin. Let's start with Bach and let the music take us on a journey. The button is all yours to press.\"\n\nTurn #15: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Sure thing, Mia. Music is indeed a wonderful journey. Let's let the soothing sounds of Bach take us away.\"\n\nTurn #16: Mia Davis said: \"Absolutely, it\u2019s a powerful shared experience. Let's allow Bach to soothe and transport us before we journey to my band's energetic soundscapes. Enjoy, Benjamin.\"\n\nTurn #17: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That sounds perfect, Mia. Let's soak in the calming melodies of Bach before we step into the energetic realm of your favorite band. Music on!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #18. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Music on indeed, Benjamin. Let's allow the calm before the 'rock-storm.' Enjoy it.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are hanging out at home and deciding what music to listen to\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Listen to a peaceful classical music to relax (Extra information: you had a stressful day and you just want to relax with some classical music)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Benjamin, have you heard the new album from my favorite band? I think you might enjoy their unique sound.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Thanks for suggesting it, Mia. I had a bit of a stressful day though, and I was actually hoping we could listen to some relaxing classical music. It always helps me wind down. How does that sound?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are hanging out at home and deciding what music to listen to\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Listen to a peaceful classical music to relax (Extra information: you had a stressful day and you just want to relax with some classical music)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Benjamin, have you heard the new album from my favorite band? I think you might enjoy their unique sound.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thanks for suggesting it, Mia. I had a bit of a stressful day though, and I was actually hoping we could listen to some relaxing classical music. It always helps me wind down. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"Well Benjamin, I understand the need to unwind. Let's make a compromise, we listen to one or two classical pieces first. After you've relaxed, we can transition to my band's latest release. Does that sound fair to you?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thank you, Mia. That sounds like a good compromise. I appreciate your understanding. Let's start with some classical pieces, and then we can explore the new sounds from your favorite band later.\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"I'm glad we found a compromise, Benjamin. Now, let's see which classical pieces we can start with.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"How about starting with Bach's Cello Suite No. 1 in G Major? It's a gentle piece that always helps me to relax.\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"That sounds like a serene piece, let's go with your choice, Benjamin. Afterward, I can't wait to introduce you to some edgier soundscapes from my favorite band.\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Mia. I'm always open to hearing new music, once I've had a chance to unwind. Let's enjoy the sounds of the cello first.\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"Sounds like a plan, Benjamin. Bach's Cello Suite No. 1 in G Major it is. I hope you'll enjoy the transition from the tranquil classical music to the energetic tunes from my favorite album afterward.\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thank you for being considerate, Mia. Looking forward to the tranquil journey first before the energetic ones from your band. I think this balance is perfect for unwinding from a long day.\"\n\nTurn #10: Mia Davis said: \"I'm glad you're open to it, Benjamin. It'll be a great music journey for us today. And who knows, you might find a new band to love!\"\n\nTurn #11: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I can't wait to embark on this musical journey, Mia. Who knows, indeed! I might just find a new genre to appreciate. Let's press play on Bach, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #12: Mia Davis said: \"Of course, Benjamin. Let's press play and start our musical journey with the soothing tones of Bach. And later, we'll shift the rhythm slightly with my favorite band's latest release. Sit back and enjoy the music.\"\n\nTurn #13: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Definitely, Mia. I look forward to both the comfort of Bach's music and the surprise of your favorite band's latest release. Let's start our musical journey.\"\n\nTurn #14: Mia Davis said: \"I'm excited for this too, Benjamin. Let's start with Bach and let the music take us on a journey. The button is all yours to press.\"\n\nTurn #15: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Sure thing, Mia. Music is indeed a wonderful journey. Let's let the soothing sounds of Bach take us away.\"\n\nTurn #16: Mia Davis said: \"Absolutely, it\u2019s a powerful shared experience. Let's allow Bach to soothe and transport us before we journey to my band's energetic soundscapes. Enjoy, Benjamin.\"\n\nTurn #17: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That sounds perfect, Mia. Let's soak in the calming melodies of Bach before we step into the energetic realm of your favorite band. Music on!\"\n\nTurn #18: Mia Davis said: \"Music on indeed, Benjamin. Let's allow the calm before the 'rock-storm.' Enjoy it.\"\n\nTurn #19: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Indeed, Mia. Here's to the calm before the 'rock-storm'. Let's enjoy this musical journey together.\"\n\nTurn #20: Mia Davis said: \"Cheers to that, Benjamin. Let's dive into the winds of Bach before we crank up the energy with my band. Let the music play!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #21. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are hanging out at home and deciding what music to listen to\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Listen to a peaceful classical music to relax (Extra information: you had a stressful day and you just want to relax with some classical music)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Benjamin, have you heard the new album from my favorite band? I think you might enjoy their unique sound.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thanks for suggesting it, Mia. I had a bit of a stressful day though, and I was actually hoping we could listen to some relaxing classical music. It always helps me wind down. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"Well Benjamin, I understand the need to unwind. Let's make a compromise, we listen to one or two classical pieces first. After you've relaxed, we can transition to my band's latest release. Does that sound fair to you?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Mia. That sounds like a good compromise. I appreciate your understanding. Let's start with some classical pieces, and then we can explore the new sounds from your favorite band later.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are hanging out at home and deciding what music to listen to\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Listen to a peaceful classical music to relax (Extra information: you had a stressful day and you just want to relax with some classical music)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Benjamin, have you heard the new album from my favorite band? I think you might enjoy their unique sound.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thanks for suggesting it, Mia. I had a bit of a stressful day though, and I was actually hoping we could listen to some relaxing classical music. It always helps me wind down. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"Well Benjamin, I understand the need to unwind. Let's make a compromise, we listen to one or two classical pieces first. After you've relaxed, we can transition to my band's latest release. Does that sound fair to you?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thank you, Mia. That sounds like a good compromise. I appreciate your understanding. Let's start with some classical pieces, and then we can explore the new sounds from your favorite band later.\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"I'm glad we found a compromise, Benjamin. Now, let's see which classical pieces we can start with.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"How about starting with Bach's Cello Suite No. 1 in G Major? It's a gentle piece that always helps me to relax.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are hanging out at home and deciding what music to listen to\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Listen to a peaceful classical music to relax (Extra information: you had a stressful day and you just want to relax with some classical music)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Benjamin, have you heard the new album from my favorite band? I think you might enjoy their unique sound.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thanks for suggesting it, Mia. I had a bit of a stressful day though, and I was actually hoping we could listen to some relaxing classical music. It always helps me wind down. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"Well Benjamin, I understand the need to unwind. Let's make a compromise, we listen to one or two classical pieces first. After you've relaxed, we can transition to my band's latest release. Does that sound fair to you?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thank you, Mia. That sounds like a good compromise. I appreciate your understanding. Let's start with some classical pieces, and then we can explore the new sounds from your favorite band later.\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"I'm glad we found a compromise, Benjamin. Now, let's see which classical pieces we can start with.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"How about starting with Bach's Cello Suite No. 1 in G Major? It's a gentle piece that always helps me to relax.\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"That sounds like a serene piece, let's go with your choice, Benjamin. Afterward, I can't wait to introduce you to some edgier soundscapes from my favorite band.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Mia. I'm always open to hearing new music, once I've had a chance to unwind. Let's enjoy the sounds of the cello first.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are hanging out at home and deciding what music to listen to\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Listen to a peaceful classical music to relax (Extra information: you had a stressful day and you just want to relax with some classical music)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Benjamin, have you heard the new album from my favorite band? I think you might enjoy their unique sound.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thanks for suggesting it, Mia. I had a bit of a stressful day though, and I was actually hoping we could listen to some relaxing classical music. It always helps me wind down. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"Well Benjamin, I understand the need to unwind. Let's make a compromise, we listen to one or two classical pieces first. After you've relaxed, we can transition to my band's latest release. Does that sound fair to you?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thank you, Mia. That sounds like a good compromise. I appreciate your understanding. Let's start with some classical pieces, and then we can explore the new sounds from your favorite band later.\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"I'm glad we found a compromise, Benjamin. Now, let's see which classical pieces we can start with.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"How about starting with Bach's Cello Suite No. 1 in G Major? It's a gentle piece that always helps me to relax.\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"That sounds like a serene piece, let's go with your choice, Benjamin. Afterward, I can't wait to introduce you to some edgier soundscapes from my favorite band.\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Mia. I'm always open to hearing new music, once I've had a chance to unwind. Let's enjoy the sounds of the cello first.\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"Sounds like a plan, Benjamin. Bach's Cello Suite No. 1 in G Major it is. I hope you'll enjoy the transition from the tranquil classical music to the energetic tunes from my favorite album afterward.\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thank you for being considerate, Mia. Looking forward to the tranquil journey first before the energetic ones from your band. I think this balance is perfect for unwinding from a long day.\"\n\nTurn #10: Mia Davis said: \"I'm glad you're open to it, Benjamin. It'll be a great music journey for us today. And who knows, you might find a new band to love!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I can't wait to embark on this musical journey, Mia. Who knows, indeed! I might just find a new genre to appreciate. Let's press play on Bach, shall we?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are hanging out at home and deciding what music to listen to\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Listen to a peaceful classical music to relax (Extra information: you had a stressful day and you just want to relax with some classical music)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Benjamin, have you heard the new album from my favorite band? I think you might enjoy their unique sound.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thanks for suggesting it, Mia. I had a bit of a stressful day though, and I was actually hoping we could listen to some relaxing classical music. It always helps me wind down. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"Well Benjamin, I understand the need to unwind. Let's make a compromise, we listen to one or two classical pieces first. After you've relaxed, we can transition to my band's latest release. Does that sound fair to you?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thank you, Mia. That sounds like a good compromise. I appreciate your understanding. Let's start with some classical pieces, and then we can explore the new sounds from your favorite band later.\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"I'm glad we found a compromise, Benjamin. Now, let's see which classical pieces we can start with.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"How about starting with Bach's Cello Suite No. 1 in G Major? It's a gentle piece that always helps me to relax.\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"That sounds like a serene piece, let's go with your choice, Benjamin. Afterward, I can't wait to introduce you to some edgier soundscapes from my favorite band.\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Mia. I'm always open to hearing new music, once I've had a chance to unwind. Let's enjoy the sounds of the cello first.\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"Sounds like a plan, Benjamin. Bach's Cello Suite No. 1 in G Major it is. I hope you'll enjoy the transition from the tranquil classical music to the energetic tunes from my favorite album afterward.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Thank you for being considerate, Mia. Looking forward to the tranquil journey first before the energetic ones from your band. I think this balance is perfect for unwinding from a long day.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are hanging out at home and deciding what music to listen to\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Listen to a peaceful classical music to relax (Extra information: you had a stressful day and you just want to relax with some classical music)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Benjamin, have you heard the new album from my favorite band? I think you might enjoy their unique sound.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thanks for suggesting it, Mia. I had a bit of a stressful day though, and I was actually hoping we could listen to some relaxing classical music. It always helps me wind down. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"Well Benjamin, I understand the need to unwind. Let's make a compromise, we listen to one or two classical pieces first. After you've relaxed, we can transition to my band's latest release. Does that sound fair to you?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thank you, Mia. That sounds like a good compromise. I appreciate your understanding. Let's start with some classical pieces, and then we can explore the new sounds from your favorite band later.\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"I'm glad we found a compromise, Benjamin. Now, let's see which classical pieces we can start with.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"How about starting with Bach's Cello Suite No. 1 in G Major? It's a gentle piece that always helps me to relax.\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"That sounds like a serene piece, let's go with your choice, Benjamin. Afterward, I can't wait to introduce you to some edgier soundscapes from my favorite band.\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Mia. I'm always open to hearing new music, once I've had a chance to unwind. Let's enjoy the sounds of the cello first.\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"Sounds like a plan, Benjamin. Bach's Cello Suite No. 1 in G Major it is. I hope you'll enjoy the transition from the tranquil classical music to the energetic tunes from my favorite album afterward.\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thank you for being considerate, Mia. Looking forward to the tranquil journey first before the energetic ones from your band. I think this balance is perfect for unwinding from a long day.\"\n\nTurn #10: Mia Davis said: \"I'm glad you're open to it, Benjamin. It'll be a great music journey for us today. And who knows, you might find a new band to love!\"\n\nTurn #11: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I can't wait to embark on this musical journey, Mia. Who knows, indeed! I might just find a new genre to appreciate. Let's press play on Bach, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #12: Mia Davis said: \"Of course, Benjamin. Let's press play and start our musical journey with the soothing tones of Bach. And later, we'll shift the rhythm slightly with my favorite band's latest release. Sit back and enjoy the music.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Definitely, Mia. I look forward to both the comfort of Bach's music and the surprise of your favorite band's latest release. Let's start our musical journey.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are hanging out at home and deciding what music to listen to\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Listen to a peaceful classical music to relax (Extra information: you had a stressful day and you just want to relax with some classical music)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Benjamin, have you heard the new album from my favorite band? I think you might enjoy their unique sound.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thanks for suggesting it, Mia. I had a bit of a stressful day though, and I was actually hoping we could listen to some relaxing classical music. It always helps me wind down. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"Well Benjamin, I understand the need to unwind. Let's make a compromise, we listen to one or two classical pieces first. After you've relaxed, we can transition to my band's latest release. Does that sound fair to you?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thank you, Mia. That sounds like a good compromise. I appreciate your understanding. Let's start with some classical pieces, and then we can explore the new sounds from your favorite band later.\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"I'm glad we found a compromise, Benjamin. Now, let's see which classical pieces we can start with.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"How about starting with Bach's Cello Suite No. 1 in G Major? It's a gentle piece that always helps me to relax.\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"That sounds like a serene piece, let's go with your choice, Benjamin. Afterward, I can't wait to introduce you to some edgier soundscapes from my favorite band.\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Mia. I'm always open to hearing new music, once I've had a chance to unwind. Let's enjoy the sounds of the cello first.\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"Sounds like a plan, Benjamin. Bach's Cello Suite No. 1 in G Major it is. I hope you'll enjoy the transition from the tranquil classical music to the energetic tunes from my favorite album afterward.\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thank you for being considerate, Mia. Looking forward to the tranquil journey first before the energetic ones from your band. I think this balance is perfect for unwinding from a long day.\"\n\nTurn #10: Mia Davis said: \"I'm glad you're open to it, Benjamin. It'll be a great music journey for us today. And who knows, you might find a new band to love!\"\n\nTurn #11: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I can't wait to embark on this musical journey, Mia. Who knows, indeed! I might just find a new genre to appreciate. Let's press play on Bach, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #12: Mia Davis said: \"Of course, Benjamin. Let's press play and start our musical journey with the soothing tones of Bach. And later, we'll shift the rhythm slightly with my favorite band's latest release. Sit back and enjoy the music.\"\n\nTurn #13: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Definitely, Mia. I look forward to both the comfort of Bach's music and the surprise of your favorite band's latest release. Let's start our musical journey.\"\n\nTurn #14: Mia Davis said: \"I'm excited for this too, Benjamin. Let's start with Bach and let the music take us on a journey. The button is all yours to press.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sure thing, Mia. Music is indeed a wonderful journey. Let's let the soothing sounds of Bach take us away.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are hanging out at home and deciding what music to listen to\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Listen to a peaceful classical music to relax (Extra information: you had a stressful day and you just want to relax with some classical music)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Benjamin, have you heard the new album from my favorite band? I think you might enjoy their unique sound.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thanks for suggesting it, Mia. I had a bit of a stressful day though, and I was actually hoping we could listen to some relaxing classical music. It always helps me wind down. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"Well Benjamin, I understand the need to unwind. Let's make a compromise, we listen to one or two classical pieces first. After you've relaxed, we can transition to my band's latest release. Does that sound fair to you?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thank you, Mia. That sounds like a good compromise. I appreciate your understanding. Let's start with some classical pieces, and then we can explore the new sounds from your favorite band later.\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"I'm glad we found a compromise, Benjamin. Now, let's see which classical pieces we can start with.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"How about starting with Bach's Cello Suite No. 1 in G Major? It's a gentle piece that always helps me to relax.\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"That sounds like a serene piece, let's go with your choice, Benjamin. Afterward, I can't wait to introduce you to some edgier soundscapes from my favorite band.\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Mia. I'm always open to hearing new music, once I've had a chance to unwind. Let's enjoy the sounds of the cello first.\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"Sounds like a plan, Benjamin. Bach's Cello Suite No. 1 in G Major it is. I hope you'll enjoy the transition from the tranquil classical music to the energetic tunes from my favorite album afterward.\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thank you for being considerate, Mia. Looking forward to the tranquil journey first before the energetic ones from your band. I think this balance is perfect for unwinding from a long day.\"\n\nTurn #10: Mia Davis said: \"I'm glad you're open to it, Benjamin. It'll be a great music journey for us today. And who knows, you might find a new band to love!\"\n\nTurn #11: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I can't wait to embark on this musical journey, Mia. Who knows, indeed! I might just find a new genre to appreciate. Let's press play on Bach, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #12: Mia Davis said: \"Of course, Benjamin. Let's press play and start our musical journey with the soothing tones of Bach. And later, we'll shift the rhythm slightly with my favorite band's latest release. Sit back and enjoy the music.\"\n\nTurn #13: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Definitely, Mia. I look forward to both the comfort of Bach's music and the surprise of your favorite band's latest release. Let's start our musical journey.\"\n\nTurn #14: Mia Davis said: \"I'm excited for this too, Benjamin. Let's start with Bach and let the music take us on a journey. The button is all yours to press.\"\n\nTurn #15: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Sure thing, Mia. Music is indeed a wonderful journey. Let's let the soothing sounds of Bach take us away.\"\n\nTurn #16: Mia Davis said: \"Absolutely, it\u2019s a powerful shared experience. Let's allow Bach to soothe and transport us before we journey to my band's energetic soundscapes. Enjoy, Benjamin.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds perfect, Mia. Let's soak in the calming melodies of Bach before we step into the energetic realm of your favorite band. Music on!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are hanging out at home and deciding what music to listen to\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Listen to a peaceful classical music to relax (Extra information: you had a stressful day and you just want to relax with some classical music)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Benjamin, have you heard the new album from my favorite band? I think you might enjoy their unique sound.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thanks for suggesting it, Mia. I had a bit of a stressful day though, and I was actually hoping we could listen to some relaxing classical music. It always helps me wind down. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"Well Benjamin, I understand the need to unwind. Let's make a compromise, we listen to one or two classical pieces first. After you've relaxed, we can transition to my band's latest release. Does that sound fair to you?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thank you, Mia. That sounds like a good compromise. I appreciate your understanding. Let's start with some classical pieces, and then we can explore the new sounds from your favorite band later.\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"I'm glad we found a compromise, Benjamin. Now, let's see which classical pieces we can start with.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"How about starting with Bach's Cello Suite No. 1 in G Major? It's a gentle piece that always helps me to relax.\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"That sounds like a serene piece, let's go with your choice, Benjamin. Afterward, I can't wait to introduce you to some edgier soundscapes from my favorite band.\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Mia. I'm always open to hearing new music, once I've had a chance to unwind. Let's enjoy the sounds of the cello first.\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"Sounds like a plan, Benjamin. Bach's Cello Suite No. 1 in G Major it is. I hope you'll enjoy the transition from the tranquil classical music to the energetic tunes from my favorite album afterward.\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thank you for being considerate, Mia. Looking forward to the tranquil journey first before the energetic ones from your band. I think this balance is perfect for unwinding from a long day.\"\n\nTurn #10: Mia Davis said: \"I'm glad you're open to it, Benjamin. It'll be a great music journey for us today. And who knows, you might find a new band to love!\"\n\nTurn #11: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I can't wait to embark on this musical journey, Mia. Who knows, indeed! I might just find a new genre to appreciate. Let's press play on Bach, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #12: Mia Davis said: \"Of course, Benjamin. Let's press play and start our musical journey with the soothing tones of Bach. And later, we'll shift the rhythm slightly with my favorite band's latest release. Sit back and enjoy the music.\"\n\nTurn #13: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Definitely, Mia. I look forward to both the comfort of Bach's music and the surprise of your favorite band's latest release. Let's start our musical journey.\"\n\nTurn #14: Mia Davis said: \"I'm excited for this too, Benjamin. Let's start with Bach and let the music take us on a journey. The button is all yours to press.\"\n\nTurn #15: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Sure thing, Mia. Music is indeed a wonderful journey. Let's let the soothing sounds of Bach take us away.\"\n\nTurn #16: Mia Davis said: \"Absolutely, it\u2019s a powerful shared experience. Let's allow Bach to soothe and transport us before we journey to my band's energetic soundscapes. Enjoy, Benjamin.\"\n\nTurn #17: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That sounds perfect, Mia. Let's soak in the calming melodies of Bach before we step into the energetic realm of your favorite band. Music on!\"\n\nTurn #18: Mia Davis said: \"Music on indeed, Benjamin. Let's allow the calm before the 'rock-storm.' Enjoy it.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #19. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, Mia. Here's to the calm before the 'rock-storm'. Let's enjoy this musical journey together.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a local charity event\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Convince your friend to donate money to the charity (Extra information: The charity is highly rated with many positive rewards.)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Ava, it's great to see you here! This charity event really means a lot to me. Have you considered making a donation? This charity has been doing some incredible work and has received many positive reviews and awards.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a local charity event\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Convince your friend to donate money to the charity (Extra information: The charity is highly rated with many positive rewards.)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, it's great to see you here! This charity event really means a lot to me. Have you considered making a donation? This charity has been doing some incredible work and has received many positive reviews and awards.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Isabelle! It's great to see you too. I deeply admire the work this charity does. I've been pondering a lot about donating. However, I'm also saving for a house which has got me worried about finances. But considering the importance of this charity, I'm thinking of setting up a small monthly donation. It may not be a significant amount at once, but I believe regular contributions can bring about a change too.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's a wonderful idea, Ava! Regular small donations could indeed make a big difference over time. And this way, you're doing your part without straining your budget. I appreciate your willingness to help. Every dollar counts, and it means so much that you\u2019re considering being a part of this.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a local charity event\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Convince your friend to donate money to the charity (Extra information: The charity is highly rated with many positive rewards.)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, it's great to see you here! This charity event really means a lot to me. Have you considered making a donation? This charity has been doing some incredible work and has received many positive reviews and awards.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Isabelle! It's great to see you too. I deeply admire the work this charity does. I've been pondering a lot about donating. However, I'm also saving for a house which has got me worried about finances. But considering the importance of this charity, I'm thinking of setting up a small monthly donation. It may not be a significant amount at once, but I believe regular contributions can bring about a change too.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"That's a wonderful idea, Ava! Regular small donations could indeed make a big difference over time. And this way, you're doing your part without straining your budget. I appreciate your willingness to help. Every dollar counts, and it means so much that you\u2019re considering being a part of this.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Thank you for understanding, Isabelle. Given my current financial goals, this seems the most appropriate way to contribute. I'm glad to know you appreciate the thought behind the small regular donations. As they say, every little bit helps, right?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Ava! It's the collective effort that really matters. And remember, it's not just about money. The fact that you are conscientiously supporting this cause and spreading awareness about it is an invaluable contribution in itself.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a local charity event\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Convince your friend to donate money to the charity (Extra information: The charity is highly rated with many positive rewards.)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, it's great to see you here! This charity event really means a lot to me. Have you considered making a donation? This charity has been doing some incredible work and has received many positive reviews and awards.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Isabelle! It's great to see you too. I deeply admire the work this charity does. I've been pondering a lot about donating. However, I'm also saving for a house which has got me worried about finances. But considering the importance of this charity, I'm thinking of setting up a small monthly donation. It may not be a significant amount at once, but I believe regular contributions can bring about a change too.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"That's a wonderful idea, Ava! Regular small donations could indeed make a big difference over time. And this way, you're doing your part without straining your budget. I appreciate your willingness to help. Every dollar counts, and it means so much that you\u2019re considering being a part of this.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Thank you for understanding, Isabelle. Given my current financial goals, this seems the most appropriate way to contribute. I'm glad to know you appreciate the thought behind the small regular donations. As they say, every little bit helps, right?\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Ava! It's the collective effort that really matters. And remember, it's not just about money. The fact that you are conscientiously supporting this cause and spreading awareness about it is an invaluable contribution in itself.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Definitely, Isabelle! Volunteering time and spreading the word about such initiatives is just as important. We may not be millionaires, but using what we have to make a difference is what truly matters. Together, we can accomplish great things. Let's continue to inspire and motivate others to give in whatever ways they can!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn't agree more, Ava! Every little bit does help and has an impact. If we can inspire others to do the same, imagine the incredible difference we could all make! To me, this charity isn't just about donations, it also signifies hope and change. So, even a small regular donation from your end means a lot. Thank you for considering this!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a local charity event\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Convince your friend to donate money to the charity (Extra information: The charity is highly rated with many positive rewards.)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, it's great to see you here! This charity event really means a lot to me. Have you considered making a donation? This charity has been doing some incredible work and has received many positive reviews and awards.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Isabelle! It's great to see you too. I deeply admire the work this charity does. I've been pondering a lot about donating. However, I'm also saving for a house which has got me worried about finances. But considering the importance of this charity, I'm thinking of setting up a small monthly donation. It may not be a significant amount at once, but I believe regular contributions can bring about a change too.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"That's a wonderful idea, Ava! Regular small donations could indeed make a big difference over time. And this way, you're doing your part without straining your budget. I appreciate your willingness to help. Every dollar counts, and it means so much that you\u2019re considering being a part of this.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Thank you for understanding, Isabelle. Given my current financial goals, this seems the most appropriate way to contribute. I'm glad to know you appreciate the thought behind the small regular donations. As they say, every little bit helps, right?\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Ava! It's the collective effort that really matters. And remember, it's not just about money. The fact that you are conscientiously supporting this cause and spreading awareness about it is an invaluable contribution in itself.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Definitely, Isabelle! Volunteering time and spreading the word about such initiatives is just as important. We may not be millionaires, but using what we have to make a difference is what truly matters. Together, we can accomplish great things. Let's continue to inspire and motivate others to give in whatever ways they can!\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I couldn't agree more, Ava! Every little bit does help and has an impact. If we can inspire others to do the same, imagine the incredible difference we could all make! To me, this charity isn't just about donations, it also signifies hope and change. So, even a small regular donation from your end means a lot. Thank you for considering this!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Thank you, Isabelle! Your words truly mean a lot. My small monthly donation is the least I can do, and I'm hopeful that it will contribute towards the cause. And yes, apart from financial contributions, let's continue to lend our voices to this cause and spread the word. After all, it's not just about giving money, but also giving time and effort to bring about the change we seek!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm deeply moved by your support, Ava. I think your approach of donating regularly, no matter how small, could inspire others as well who are in a similar situation. Not to mention, it definitely uplifts the spirits of everyone involved in the charity. Let's continue our efforts to bring about a change together!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a local charity event\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Convince your friend to donate money to the charity (Extra information: The charity is highly rated with many positive rewards.)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, it's great to see you here! This charity event really means a lot to me. Have you considered making a donation? This charity has been doing some incredible work and has received many positive reviews and awards.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Isabelle! It's great to see you too. I deeply admire the work this charity does. I've been pondering a lot about donating. However, I'm also saving for a house which has got me worried about finances. But considering the importance of this charity, I'm thinking of setting up a small monthly donation. It may not be a significant amount at once, but I believe regular contributions can bring about a change too.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"That's a wonderful idea, Ava! Regular small donations could indeed make a big difference over time. And this way, you're doing your part without straining your budget. I appreciate your willingness to help. Every dollar counts, and it means so much that you\u2019re considering being a part of this.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Thank you for understanding, Isabelle. Given my current financial goals, this seems the most appropriate way to contribute. I'm glad to know you appreciate the thought behind the small regular donations. As they say, every little bit helps, right?\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Ava! It's the collective effort that really matters. And remember, it's not just about money. The fact that you are conscientiously supporting this cause and spreading awareness about it is an invaluable contribution in itself.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Definitely, Isabelle! Volunteering time and spreading the word about such initiatives is just as important. We may not be millionaires, but using what we have to make a difference is what truly matters. Together, we can accomplish great things. Let's continue to inspire and motivate others to give in whatever ways they can!\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I couldn't agree more, Ava! Every little bit does help and has an impact. If we can inspire others to do the same, imagine the incredible difference we could all make! To me, this charity isn't just about donations, it also signifies hope and change. So, even a small regular donation from your end means a lot. Thank you for considering this!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Thank you, Isabelle! Your words truly mean a lot. My small monthly donation is the least I can do, and I'm hopeful that it will contribute towards the cause. And yes, apart from financial contributions, let's continue to lend our voices to this cause and spread the word. After all, it's not just about giving money, but also giving time and effort to bring about the change we seek!\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm deeply moved by your support, Ava. I think your approach of donating regularly, no matter how small, could inspire others as well who are in a similar situation. Not to mention, it definitely uplifts the spirits of everyone involved in the charity. Let's continue our efforts to bring about a change together!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"That's heartening to hear, Isabelle. I hope my small monthly donation can indeed inspire more people to contribute what they can. It's the collective effort that creates major impact. I'm committed to continuing my support for this and other important causes. Let's keep pushing for change!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're absolutely right, Ava. A collective effort will create a significant impact. And I truly hope your dedication will inspire many others to contribute in whichever way they can. Let's indeed keep pushing for the change. Remember, the greatest magic lies in simple, small acts of kindness.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a local charity event\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Convince your friend to donate money to the charity (Extra information: The charity is highly rated with many positive rewards.)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, it's great to see you here! This charity event really means a lot to me. Have you considered making a donation? This charity has been doing some incredible work and has received many positive reviews and awards.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Isabelle! It's great to see you too. I deeply admire the work this charity does. I've been pondering a lot about donating. However, I'm also saving for a house which has got me worried about finances. But considering the importance of this charity, I'm thinking of setting up a small monthly donation. It may not be a significant amount at once, but I believe regular contributions can bring about a change too.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"That's a wonderful idea, Ava! Regular small donations could indeed make a big difference over time. And this way, you're doing your part without straining your budget. I appreciate your willingness to help. Every dollar counts, and it means so much that you\u2019re considering being a part of this.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Thank you for understanding, Isabelle. Given my current financial goals, this seems the most appropriate way to contribute. I'm glad to know you appreciate the thought behind the small regular donations. As they say, every little bit helps, right?\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Ava! It's the collective effort that really matters. And remember, it's not just about money. The fact that you are conscientiously supporting this cause and spreading awareness about it is an invaluable contribution in itself.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Definitely, Isabelle! Volunteering time and spreading the word about such initiatives is just as important. We may not be millionaires, but using what we have to make a difference is what truly matters. Together, we can accomplish great things. Let's continue to inspire and motivate others to give in whatever ways they can!\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I couldn't agree more, Ava! Every little bit does help and has an impact. If we can inspire others to do the same, imagine the incredible difference we could all make! To me, this charity isn't just about donations, it also signifies hope and change. So, even a small regular donation from your end means a lot. Thank you for considering this!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Thank you, Isabelle! Your words truly mean a lot. My small monthly donation is the least I can do, and I'm hopeful that it will contribute towards the cause. And yes, apart from financial contributions, let's continue to lend our voices to this cause and spread the word. After all, it's not just about giving money, but also giving time and effort to bring about the change we seek!\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm deeply moved by your support, Ava. I think your approach of donating regularly, no matter how small, could inspire others as well who are in a similar situation. Not to mention, it definitely uplifts the spirits of everyone involved in the charity. Let's continue our efforts to bring about a change together!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"That's heartening to hear, Isabelle. I hope my small monthly donation can indeed inspire more people to contribute what they can. It's the collective effort that creates major impact. I'm committed to continuing my support for this and other important causes. Let's keep pushing for change!\"\n\nTurn #10: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're absolutely right, Ava. A collective effort will create a significant impact. And I truly hope your dedication will inspire many others to contribute in whichever way they can. Let's indeed keep pushing for the change. Remember, the greatest magic lies in simple, small acts of kindness.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle! Small acts of kindness really can make the world of difference. That's the beauty of it all. Alright, I better head over and set up my monthly donation now. Keep up the inspiring work!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's fantastic, Ava! Your contribution, however small, will certainly make a difference. Let's keep the magic of kindness alive. Thanks for your support, and see you around!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a local charity event\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Convince your friend to donate money to the charity (Extra information: The charity is highly rated with many positive rewards.)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, it's great to see you here! This charity event really means a lot to me. Have you considered making a donation? This charity has been doing some incredible work and has received many positive reviews and awards.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Isabelle! It's great to see you too. I deeply admire the work this charity does. I've been pondering a lot about donating. However, I'm also saving for a house which has got me worried about finances. But considering the importance of this charity, I'm thinking of setting up a small monthly donation. It may not be a significant amount at once, but I believe regular contributions can bring about a change too.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"That's a wonderful idea, Ava! Regular small donations could indeed make a big difference over time. And this way, you're doing your part without straining your budget. I appreciate your willingness to help. Every dollar counts, and it means so much that you\u2019re considering being a part of this.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Thank you for understanding, Isabelle. Given my current financial goals, this seems the most appropriate way to contribute. I'm glad to know you appreciate the thought behind the small regular donations. As they say, every little bit helps, right?\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Ava! It's the collective effort that really matters. And remember, it's not just about money. The fact that you are conscientiously supporting this cause and spreading awareness about it is an invaluable contribution in itself.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Definitely, Isabelle! Volunteering time and spreading the word about such initiatives is just as important. We may not be millionaires, but using what we have to make a difference is what truly matters. Together, we can accomplish great things. Let's continue to inspire and motivate others to give in whatever ways they can!\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I couldn't agree more, Ava! Every little bit does help and has an impact. If we can inspire others to do the same, imagine the incredible difference we could all make! To me, this charity isn't just about donations, it also signifies hope and change. So, even a small regular donation from your end means a lot. Thank you for considering this!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Thank you, Isabelle! Your words truly mean a lot. My small monthly donation is the least I can do, and I'm hopeful that it will contribute towards the cause. And yes, apart from financial contributions, let's continue to lend our voices to this cause and spread the word. After all, it's not just about giving money, but also giving time and effort to bring about the change we seek!\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm deeply moved by your support, Ava. I think your approach of donating regularly, no matter how small, could inspire others as well who are in a similar situation. Not to mention, it definitely uplifts the spirits of everyone involved in the charity. Let's continue our efforts to bring about a change together!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"That's heartening to hear, Isabelle. I hope my small monthly donation can indeed inspire more people to contribute what they can. It's the collective effort that creates major impact. I'm committed to continuing my support for this and other important causes. Let's keep pushing for change!\"\n\nTurn #10: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're absolutely right, Ava. A collective effort will create a significant impact. And I truly hope your dedication will inspire many others to contribute in whichever way they can. Let's indeed keep pushing for the change. Remember, the greatest magic lies in simple, small acts of kindness.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle! Small acts of kindness really can make the world of difference. That's the beauty of it all. Alright, I better head over and set up my monthly donation now. Keep up the inspiring work!\"\n\nTurn #12: Isabelle Martinez said: \"That's fantastic, Ava! Your contribution, however small, will certainly make a difference. Let's keep the magic of kindness alive. Thanks for your support, and see you around!\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Martinez left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a local charity event\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Decide whether to donate while considering financial stability (Extra information: you want to support the charity, but you are also saving for a house. Hint: you can express your concern about your financial situation, and maybe you can find a compromise, like setting up a small monthly donation.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, it's great to see you here! This charity event really means a lot to me. Have you considered making a donation? This charity has been doing some incredible work and has received many positive reviews and awards.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Isabelle! It's great to see you too. I deeply admire the work this charity does. I've been pondering a lot about donating. However, I'm also saving for a house which has got me worried about finances. But considering the importance of this charity, I'm thinking of setting up a small monthly donation. It may not be a significant amount at once, but I believe regular contributions can bring about a change too.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a local charity event\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Decide whether to donate while considering financial stability (Extra information: you want to support the charity, but you are also saving for a house. Hint: you can express your concern about your financial situation, and maybe you can find a compromise, like setting up a small monthly donation.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, it's great to see you here! This charity event really means a lot to me. Have you considered making a donation? This charity has been doing some incredible work and has received many positive reviews and awards.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Isabelle! It's great to see you too. I deeply admire the work this charity does. I've been pondering a lot about donating. However, I'm also saving for a house which has got me worried about finances. But considering the importance of this charity, I'm thinking of setting up a small monthly donation. It may not be a significant amount at once, but I believe regular contributions can bring about a change too.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"That's a wonderful idea, Ava! Regular small donations could indeed make a big difference over time. And this way, you're doing your part without straining your budget. I appreciate your willingness to help. Every dollar counts, and it means so much that you\u2019re considering being a part of this.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you for understanding, Isabelle. Given my current financial goals, this seems the most appropriate way to contribute. I'm glad to know you appreciate the thought behind the small regular donations. As they say, every little bit helps, right?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a local charity event\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Decide whether to donate while considering financial stability (Extra information: you want to support the charity, but you are also saving for a house. Hint: you can express your concern about your financial situation, and maybe you can find a compromise, like setting up a small monthly donation.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, it's great to see you here! This charity event really means a lot to me. Have you considered making a donation? This charity has been doing some incredible work and has received many positive reviews and awards.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Isabelle! It's great to see you too. I deeply admire the work this charity does. I've been pondering a lot about donating. However, I'm also saving for a house which has got me worried about finances. But considering the importance of this charity, I'm thinking of setting up a small monthly donation. It may not be a significant amount at once, but I believe regular contributions can bring about a change too.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"That's a wonderful idea, Ava! Regular small donations could indeed make a big difference over time. And this way, you're doing your part without straining your budget. I appreciate your willingness to help. Every dollar counts, and it means so much that you\u2019re considering being a part of this.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Thank you for understanding, Isabelle. Given my current financial goals, this seems the most appropriate way to contribute. I'm glad to know you appreciate the thought behind the small regular donations. As they say, every little bit helps, right?\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Ava! It's the collective effort that really matters. And remember, it's not just about money. The fact that you are conscientiously supporting this cause and spreading awareness about it is an invaluable contribution in itself.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Definitely, Isabelle! Volunteering time and spreading the word about such initiatives is just as important. We may not be millionaires, but using what we have to make a difference is what truly matters. Together, we can accomplish great things. Let's continue to inspire and motivate others to give in whatever ways they can!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a local charity event\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Decide whether to donate while considering financial stability (Extra information: you want to support the charity, but you are also saving for a house. Hint: you can express your concern about your financial situation, and maybe you can find a compromise, like setting up a small monthly donation.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, it's great to see you here! This charity event really means a lot to me. Have you considered making a donation? This charity has been doing some incredible work and has received many positive reviews and awards.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Isabelle! It's great to see you too. I deeply admire the work this charity does. I've been pondering a lot about donating. However, I'm also saving for a house which has got me worried about finances. But considering the importance of this charity, I'm thinking of setting up a small monthly donation. It may not be a significant amount at once, but I believe regular contributions can bring about a change too.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"That's a wonderful idea, Ava! Regular small donations could indeed make a big difference over time. And this way, you're doing your part without straining your budget. I appreciate your willingness to help. Every dollar counts, and it means so much that you\u2019re considering being a part of this.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Thank you for understanding, Isabelle. Given my current financial goals, this seems the most appropriate way to contribute. I'm glad to know you appreciate the thought behind the small regular donations. As they say, every little bit helps, right?\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Ava! It's the collective effort that really matters. And remember, it's not just about money. The fact that you are conscientiously supporting this cause and spreading awareness about it is an invaluable contribution in itself.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Definitely, Isabelle! Volunteering time and spreading the word about such initiatives is just as important. We may not be millionaires, but using what we have to make a difference is what truly matters. Together, we can accomplish great things. Let's continue to inspire and motivate others to give in whatever ways they can!\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I couldn't agree more, Ava! Every little bit does help and has an impact. If we can inspire others to do the same, imagine the incredible difference we could all make! To me, this charity isn't just about donations, it also signifies hope and change. So, even a small regular donation from your end means a lot. Thank you for considering this!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Isabelle! Your words truly mean a lot. My small monthly donation is the least I can do, and I'm hopeful that it will contribute towards the cause. And yes, apart from financial contributions, let's continue to lend our voices to this cause and spread the word. After all, it's not just about giving money, but also giving time and effort to bring about the change we seek!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a local charity event\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Decide whether to donate while considering financial stability (Extra information: you want to support the charity, but you are also saving for a house. Hint: you can express your concern about your financial situation, and maybe you can find a compromise, like setting up a small monthly donation.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, it's great to see you here! This charity event really means a lot to me. Have you considered making a donation? This charity has been doing some incredible work and has received many positive reviews and awards.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Isabelle! It's great to see you too. I deeply admire the work this charity does. I've been pondering a lot about donating. However, I'm also saving for a house which has got me worried about finances. But considering the importance of this charity, I'm thinking of setting up a small monthly donation. It may not be a significant amount at once, but I believe regular contributions can bring about a change too.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"That's a wonderful idea, Ava! Regular small donations could indeed make a big difference over time. And this way, you're doing your part without straining your budget. I appreciate your willingness to help. Every dollar counts, and it means so much that you\u2019re considering being a part of this.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Thank you for understanding, Isabelle. Given my current financial goals, this seems the most appropriate way to contribute. I'm glad to know you appreciate the thought behind the small regular donations. As they say, every little bit helps, right?\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Ava! It's the collective effort that really matters. And remember, it's not just about money. The fact that you are conscientiously supporting this cause and spreading awareness about it is an invaluable contribution in itself.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Definitely, Isabelle! Volunteering time and spreading the word about such initiatives is just as important. We may not be millionaires, but using what we have to make a difference is what truly matters. Together, we can accomplish great things. Let's continue to inspire and motivate others to give in whatever ways they can!\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I couldn't agree more, Ava! Every little bit does help and has an impact. If we can inspire others to do the same, imagine the incredible difference we could all make! To me, this charity isn't just about donations, it also signifies hope and change. So, even a small regular donation from your end means a lot. Thank you for considering this!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Thank you, Isabelle! Your words truly mean a lot. My small monthly donation is the least I can do, and I'm hopeful that it will contribute towards the cause. And yes, apart from financial contributions, let's continue to lend our voices to this cause and spread the word. After all, it's not just about giving money, but also giving time and effort to bring about the change we seek!\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm deeply moved by your support, Ava. I think your approach of donating regularly, no matter how small, could inspire others as well who are in a similar situation. Not to mention, it definitely uplifts the spirits of everyone involved in the charity. Let's continue our efforts to bring about a change together!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's heartening to hear, Isabelle. I hope my small monthly donation can indeed inspire more people to contribute what they can. It's the collective effort that creates major impact. I'm committed to continuing my support for this and other important causes. Let's keep pushing for change!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a local charity event\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Decide whether to donate while considering financial stability (Extra information: you want to support the charity, but you are also saving for a house. Hint: you can express your concern about your financial situation, and maybe you can find a compromise, like setting up a small monthly donation.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, it's great to see you here! This charity event really means a lot to me. Have you considered making a donation? This charity has been doing some incredible work and has received many positive reviews and awards.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Isabelle! It's great to see you too. I deeply admire the work this charity does. I've been pondering a lot about donating. However, I'm also saving for a house which has got me worried about finances. But considering the importance of this charity, I'm thinking of setting up a small monthly donation. It may not be a significant amount at once, but I believe regular contributions can bring about a change too.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"That's a wonderful idea, Ava! Regular small donations could indeed make a big difference over time. And this way, you're doing your part without straining your budget. I appreciate your willingness to help. Every dollar counts, and it means so much that you\u2019re considering being a part of this.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Thank you for understanding, Isabelle. Given my current financial goals, this seems the most appropriate way to contribute. I'm glad to know you appreciate the thought behind the small regular donations. As they say, every little bit helps, right?\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Ava! It's the collective effort that really matters. And remember, it's not just about money. The fact that you are conscientiously supporting this cause and spreading awareness about it is an invaluable contribution in itself.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Definitely, Isabelle! Volunteering time and spreading the word about such initiatives is just as important. We may not be millionaires, but using what we have to make a difference is what truly matters. Together, we can accomplish great things. Let's continue to inspire and motivate others to give in whatever ways they can!\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I couldn't agree more, Ava! Every little bit does help and has an impact. If we can inspire others to do the same, imagine the incredible difference we could all make! To me, this charity isn't just about donations, it also signifies hope and change. So, even a small regular donation from your end means a lot. Thank you for considering this!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Thank you, Isabelle! Your words truly mean a lot. My small monthly donation is the least I can do, and I'm hopeful that it will contribute towards the cause. And yes, apart from financial contributions, let's continue to lend our voices to this cause and spread the word. After all, it's not just about giving money, but also giving time and effort to bring about the change we seek!\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm deeply moved by your support, Ava. I think your approach of donating regularly, no matter how small, could inspire others as well who are in a similar situation. Not to mention, it definitely uplifts the spirits of everyone involved in the charity. Let's continue our efforts to bring about a change together!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"That's heartening to hear, Isabelle. I hope my small monthly donation can indeed inspire more people to contribute what they can. It's the collective effort that creates major impact. I'm committed to continuing my support for this and other important causes. Let's keep pushing for change!\"\n\nTurn #10: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're absolutely right, Ava. A collective effort will create a significant impact. And I truly hope your dedication will inspire many others to contribute in whichever way they can. Let's indeed keep pushing for the change. Remember, the greatest magic lies in simple, small acts of kindness.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Isabelle! Small acts of kindness really can make the world of difference. That's the beauty of it all. Alright, I better head over and set up my monthly donation now. Keep up the inspiring work!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a local charity event\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Decide whether to donate while considering financial stability (Extra information: you want to support the charity, but you are also saving for a house. Hint: you can express your concern about your financial situation, and maybe you can find a compromise, like setting up a small monthly donation.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, it's great to see you here! This charity event really means a lot to me. Have you considered making a donation? This charity has been doing some incredible work and has received many positive reviews and awards.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Isabelle! It's great to see you too. I deeply admire the work this charity does. I've been pondering a lot about donating. However, I'm also saving for a house which has got me worried about finances. But considering the importance of this charity, I'm thinking of setting up a small monthly donation. It may not be a significant amount at once, but I believe regular contributions can bring about a change too.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"That's a wonderful idea, Ava! Regular small donations could indeed make a big difference over time. And this way, you're doing your part without straining your budget. I appreciate your willingness to help. Every dollar counts, and it means so much that you\u2019re considering being a part of this.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Thank you for understanding, Isabelle. Given my current financial goals, this seems the most appropriate way to contribute. I'm glad to know you appreciate the thought behind the small regular donations. As they say, every little bit helps, right?\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Ava! It's the collective effort that really matters. And remember, it's not just about money. The fact that you are conscientiously supporting this cause and spreading awareness about it is an invaluable contribution in itself.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Definitely, Isabelle! Volunteering time and spreading the word about such initiatives is just as important. We may not be millionaires, but using what we have to make a difference is what truly matters. Together, we can accomplish great things. Let's continue to inspire and motivate others to give in whatever ways they can!\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I couldn't agree more, Ava! Every little bit does help and has an impact. If we can inspire others to do the same, imagine the incredible difference we could all make! To me, this charity isn't just about donations, it also signifies hope and change. So, even a small regular donation from your end means a lot. Thank you for considering this!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Thank you, Isabelle! Your words truly mean a lot. My small monthly donation is the least I can do, and I'm hopeful that it will contribute towards the cause. And yes, apart from financial contributions, let's continue to lend our voices to this cause and spread the word. After all, it's not just about giving money, but also giving time and effort to bring about the change we seek!\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm deeply moved by your support, Ava. I think your approach of donating regularly, no matter how small, could inspire others as well who are in a similar situation. Not to mention, it definitely uplifts the spirits of everyone involved in the charity. Let's continue our efforts to bring about a change together!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"That's heartening to hear, Isabelle. I hope my small monthly donation can indeed inspire more people to contribute what they can. It's the collective effort that creates major impact. I'm committed to continuing my support for this and other important causes. Let's keep pushing for change!\"\n\nTurn #10: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're absolutely right, Ava. A collective effort will create a significant impact. And I truly hope your dedication will inspire many others to contribute in whichever way they can. Let's indeed keep pushing for the change. Remember, the greatest magic lies in simple, small acts of kindness.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle! Small acts of kindness really can make the world of difference. That's the beauty of it all. Alright, I better head over and set up my monthly donation now. Keep up the inspiring work!\"\n\nTurn #12: Isabelle Martinez said: \"That's fantastic, Ava! Your contribution, however small, will certainly make a difference. Let's keep the magic of kindness alive. Thanks for your support, and see you around!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Rafael Cortez, your task is to act/speak as Rafael Cortez would, keeping in mind Rafael Cortez's social goal.\nYou can find Rafael Cortez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Rafael Cortez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Rafael Cortez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to divide certain items that they bought together for their apartment. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Mia Sanders\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. Personality and values description: Rafael Cortez, with his outgoing nature and competitive spirit, believes in self-direction. He employs a systematic approach to his decisions. Rafael's secrets: He cheated on his medical school exams.\nMia Sanders's background: Mia Sanders is a 33-year-old female nurse. She/her pronouns. Mia Sanders often brings her son to the hospital. \nRafael Cortez's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, each book is worth 2 points, each hat is worth 3 points, and the ball is worth 5 points)\nMia Sanders's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Good evening, Mia. I think we can agree to divide our common items based on their importance to each of us. How would you suggest we go about this?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Rafael Cortez, your task is to act/speak as Rafael Cortez would, keeping in mind Rafael Cortez's social goal.\nYou can find Rafael Cortez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Rafael Cortez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Rafael Cortez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to divide certain items that they bought together for their apartment. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Mia Sanders\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. Personality and values description: Rafael Cortez, with his outgoing nature and competitive spirit, believes in self-direction. He employs a systematic approach to his decisions. Rafael's secrets: He cheated on his medical school exams.\nMia Sanders's background: Mia Sanders is a 33-year-old female nurse. She/her pronouns. Mia Sanders often brings her son to the hospital. \nRafael Cortez's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, each book is worth 2 points, each hat is worth 3 points, and the ball is worth 5 points)\nMia Sanders's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening, Mia. I think we can agree to divide our common items based on their importance to each of us. How would you suggest we go about this?\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Sanders said: \"Good evening, Rafael. That seems like a fair plan. Given our preferences and the value we each attribute to these items, I suggest we each share our points allocation for every item. For instance, I value the books quite a bit, while the hats hold less nostalgia for me. I suppose the ball could be interesting too. How about you? \"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I appreciate your suggestion, Mia. I would say that the books also resonate with me as they remind me of my time in medical school. However, the hats seem to carry more weight for me due to their uniqueness. I like the ball too, though not as much as the others. It seems both of us have quite an attachment to the books and the ball, wouldn't you agree?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Rafael Cortez, your task is to act/speak as Rafael Cortez would, keeping in mind Rafael Cortez's social goal.\nYou can find Rafael Cortez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Rafael Cortez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Rafael Cortez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to divide certain items that they bought together for their apartment. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Mia Sanders\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. Personality and values description: Rafael Cortez, with his outgoing nature and competitive spirit, believes in self-direction. He employs a systematic approach to his decisions. Rafael's secrets: He cheated on his medical school exams.\nMia Sanders's background: Mia Sanders is a 33-year-old female nurse. She/her pronouns. Mia Sanders often brings her son to the hospital. \nRafael Cortez's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, each book is worth 2 points, each hat is worth 3 points, and the ball is worth 5 points)\nMia Sanders's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening, Mia. I think we can agree to divide our common items based on their importance to each of us. How would you suggest we go about this?\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Sanders said: \"Good evening, Rafael. That seems like a fair plan. Given our preferences and the value we each attribute to these items, I suggest we each share our points allocation for every item. For instance, I value the books quite a bit, while the hats hold less nostalgia for me. I suppose the ball could be interesting too. How about you? \"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"I appreciate your suggestion, Mia. I would say that the books also resonate with me as they remind me of my time in medical school. However, the hats seem to carry more weight for me due to their uniqueness. I like the ball too, though not as much as the others. It seems both of us have quite an attachment to the books and the ball, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #3: Mia Sanders said: \"You're right, Rafael. We both value the books greatly, and while the hats hold more of your interest, I find myself drawn to the ball a bit more. Perhaps we can split the books equally, you take the hats that you value, and I can have the ball? It seems like a fair division considering our attachments.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds like a reasonable plan, Mia. However, considering the correlation we both have with the books, I was wondering if we could split the books as follows: two for me and one for you, just for equitable allocation. In light of my lesser interest in the ball, I'm willing to let you have it. And, I'll happily keep the hats. Would this arrangement be agreeable with you?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Rafael Cortez, your task is to act/speak as Rafael Cortez would, keeping in mind Rafael Cortez's social goal.\nYou can find Rafael Cortez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Rafael Cortez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Rafael Cortez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to divide certain items that they bought together for their apartment. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Mia Sanders\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. Personality and values description: Rafael Cortez, with his outgoing nature and competitive spirit, believes in self-direction. He employs a systematic approach to his decisions. Rafael's secrets: He cheated on his medical school exams.\nMia Sanders's background: Mia Sanders is a 33-year-old female nurse. She/her pronouns. Mia Sanders often brings her son to the hospital. \nRafael Cortez's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, each book is worth 2 points, each hat is worth 3 points, and the ball is worth 5 points)\nMia Sanders's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening, Mia. I think we can agree to divide our common items based on their importance to each of us. How would you suggest we go about this?\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Sanders said: \"Good evening, Rafael. That seems like a fair plan. Given our preferences and the value we each attribute to these items, I suggest we each share our points allocation for every item. For instance, I value the books quite a bit, while the hats hold less nostalgia for me. I suppose the ball could be interesting too. How about you? \"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"I appreciate your suggestion, Mia. I would say that the books also resonate with me as they remind me of my time in medical school. However, the hats seem to carry more weight for me due to their uniqueness. I like the ball too, though not as much as the others. It seems both of us have quite an attachment to the books and the ball, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #3: Mia Sanders said: \"You're right, Rafael. We both value the books greatly, and while the hats hold more of your interest, I find myself drawn to the ball a bit more. Perhaps we can split the books equally, you take the hats that you value, and I can have the ball? It seems like a fair division considering our attachments.\"\n\nTurn #4: Rafael Cortez said: \"That sounds like a reasonable plan, Mia. However, considering the correlation we both have with the books, I was wondering if we could split the books as follows: two for me and one for you, just for equitable allocation. In light of my lesser interest in the ball, I'm willing to let you have it. And, I'll happily keep the hats. Would this arrangement be agreeable with you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Mia Sanders said: \"I understand where you're coming from, Rafael. Since we both value the books, splitting them as you suggested makes sense, even if it means I get one less. In return, I would very much appreciate having the ball. So, the hats are all yours. This arrangement seems fair to both of us.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sounds like a plan, Mia. We both get to keep the items we cherish the most. This thoughtful division benefits both parties, indeed. Let's proceed with this arrangement.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Sanders, your task is to act/speak as Mia Sanders would, keeping in mind Mia Sanders's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Sanders's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Sanders's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Sanders's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to divide certain items that they bought together for their apartment. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Mia Sanders\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. \nMia Sanders's background: Mia Sanders is a 33-year-old female nurse. She/her pronouns. Mia Sanders often brings her son to the hospital. Personality and values description: Mia Sanders, a careful follower of routines, values loyalty and conformity. Her decisions rely heavily on intuition. Mia's secrets: She is a talented painter but never shares her work.\nRafael Cortez's goal: Unknown\nMia Sanders's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, each book is worth 3 points, each hat is worth 2 points, and the ball is worth 4 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening, Mia. I think we can agree to divide our common items based on their importance to each of us. How would you suggest we go about this?\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Sanders said: \"Good evening, Rafael. That seems like a fair plan. Given our preferences and the value we each attribute to these items, I suggest we each share our points allocation for every item. For instance, I value the books quite a bit, while the hats hold less nostalgia for me. I suppose the ball could be interesting too. How about you? \"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"I appreciate your suggestion, Mia. I would say that the books also resonate with me as they remind me of my time in medical school. However, the hats seem to carry more weight for me due to their uniqueness. I like the ball too, though not as much as the others. It seems both of us have quite an attachment to the books and the ball, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #3: Mia Sanders said: \"You're right, Rafael. We both value the books greatly, and while the hats hold more of your interest, I find myself drawn to the ball a bit more. Perhaps we can split the books equally, you take the hats that you value, and I can have the ball? It seems like a fair division considering our attachments.\"\n\nTurn #4: Rafael Cortez said: \"That sounds like a reasonable plan, Mia. However, considering the correlation we both have with the books, I was wondering if we could split the books as follows: two for me and one for you, just for equitable allocation. In light of my lesser interest in the ball, I'm willing to let you have it. And, I'll happily keep the hats. Would this arrangement be agreeable with you?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I understand where you're coming from, Rafael. Since we both value the books, splitting them as you suggested makes sense, even if it means I get one less. In return, I would very much appreciate having the ball. So, the hats are all yours. This arrangement seems fair to both of us.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Sanders, your task is to act/speak as Mia Sanders would, keeping in mind Mia Sanders's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Sanders's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Sanders's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Sanders's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to divide certain items that they bought together for their apartment. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Mia Sanders\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. \nMia Sanders's background: Mia Sanders is a 33-year-old female nurse. She/her pronouns. Mia Sanders often brings her son to the hospital. Personality and values description: Mia Sanders, a careful follower of routines, values loyalty and conformity. Her decisions rely heavily on intuition. Mia's secrets: She is a talented painter but never shares her work.\nRafael Cortez's goal: Unknown\nMia Sanders's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, each book is worth 3 points, each hat is worth 2 points, and the ball is worth 4 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening, Mia. I think we can agree to divide our common items based on their importance to each of us. How would you suggest we go about this?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Good evening, Rafael. That seems like a fair plan. Given our preferences and the value we each attribute to these items, I suggest we each share our points allocation for every item. For instance, I value the books quite a bit, while the hats hold less nostalgia for me. I suppose the ball could be interesting too. How about you? '}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Sanders, your task is to act/speak as Mia Sanders would, keeping in mind Mia Sanders's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Sanders's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Sanders's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Sanders's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to divide certain items that they bought together for their apartment. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Mia Sanders\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. \nMia Sanders's background: Mia Sanders is a 33-year-old female nurse. She/her pronouns. Mia Sanders often brings her son to the hospital. Personality and values description: Mia Sanders, a careful follower of routines, values loyalty and conformity. Her decisions rely heavily on intuition. Mia's secrets: She is a talented painter but never shares her work.\nRafael Cortez's goal: Unknown\nMia Sanders's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, each book is worth 3 points, each hat is worth 2 points, and the ball is worth 4 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening, Mia. I think we can agree to divide our common items based on their importance to each of us. How would you suggest we go about this?\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Sanders said: \"Good evening, Rafael. That seems like a fair plan. Given our preferences and the value we each attribute to these items, I suggest we each share our points allocation for every item. For instance, I value the books quite a bit, while the hats hold less nostalgia for me. I suppose the ball could be interesting too. How about you? \"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"I appreciate your suggestion, Mia. I would say that the books also resonate with me as they remind me of my time in medical school. However, the hats seem to carry more weight for me due to their uniqueness. I like the ball too, though not as much as the others. It seems both of us have quite an attachment to the books and the ball, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #3: Mia Sanders said: \"You're right, Rafael. We both value the books greatly, and while the hats hold more of your interest, I find myself drawn to the ball a bit more. Perhaps we can split the books equally, you take the hats that you value, and I can have the ball? It seems like a fair division considering our attachments.\"\n\nTurn #4: Rafael Cortez said: \"That sounds like a reasonable plan, Mia. However, considering the correlation we both have with the books, I was wondering if we could split the books as follows: two for me and one for you, just for equitable allocation. In light of my lesser interest in the ball, I'm willing to let you have it. And, I'll happily keep the hats. Would this arrangement be agreeable with you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Mia Sanders said: \"I understand where you're coming from, Rafael. Since we both value the books, splitting them as you suggested makes sense, even if it means I get one less. In return, I would very much appreciate having the ball. So, the hats are all yours. This arrangement seems fair to both of us.\"\n\nTurn #6: Rafael Cortez said: \"Sounds like a plan, Mia. We both get to keep the items we cherish the most. This thoughtful division benefits both parties, indeed. Let's proceed with this arrangement.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'I agree, Rafael. This seems like a balanced approach that considers both our sentiments towards these items. Thank you for understanding and accommodating my preferences as well in this arrangement.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Sanders, your task is to act/speak as Mia Sanders would, keeping in mind Mia Sanders's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Sanders's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Sanders's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Sanders's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to divide certain items that they bought together for their apartment. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Mia Sanders\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. \nMia Sanders's background: Mia Sanders is a 33-year-old female nurse. She/her pronouns. Mia Sanders often brings her son to the hospital. Personality and values description: Mia Sanders, a careful follower of routines, values loyalty and conformity. Her decisions rely heavily on intuition. Mia's secrets: She is a talented painter but never shares her work.\nRafael Cortez's goal: Unknown\nMia Sanders's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, each book is worth 3 points, each hat is worth 2 points, and the ball is worth 4 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening, Mia. I think we can agree to divide our common items based on their importance to each of us. How would you suggest we go about this?\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Sanders said: \"Good evening, Rafael. That seems like a fair plan. Given our preferences and the value we each attribute to these items, I suggest we each share our points allocation for every item. For instance, I value the books quite a bit, while the hats hold less nostalgia for me. I suppose the ball could be interesting too. How about you? \"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"I appreciate your suggestion, Mia. I would say that the books also resonate with me as they remind me of my time in medical school. However, the hats seem to carry more weight for me due to their uniqueness. I like the ball too, though not as much as the others. It seems both of us have quite an attachment to the books and the ball, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #3: Mia Sanders said: \"You're right, Rafael. We both value the books greatly, and while the hats hold more of your interest, I find myself drawn to the ball a bit more. Perhaps we can split the books equally, you take the hats that you value, and I can have the ball? It seems like a fair division considering our attachments.\"\n\nTurn #4: Rafael Cortez said: \"That sounds like a reasonable plan, Mia. However, considering the correlation we both have with the books, I was wondering if we could split the books as follows: two for me and one for you, just for equitable allocation. In light of my lesser interest in the ball, I'm willing to let you have it. And, I'll happily keep the hats. Would this arrangement be agreeable with you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Mia Sanders said: \"I understand where you're coming from, Rafael. Since we both value the books, splitting them as you suggested makes sense, even if it means I get one less. In return, I would very much appreciate having the ball. So, the hats are all yours. This arrangement seems fair to both of us.\"\n\nTurn #6: Rafael Cortez said: \"Sounds like a plan, Mia. We both get to keep the items we cherish the most. This thoughtful division benefits both parties, indeed. Let's proceed with this arrangement.\"\n\nTurn #7: Mia Sanders said: \"I agree, Rafael. This seems like a balanced approach that considers both our sentiments towards these items. Thank you for understanding and accommodating my preferences as well in this arrangement.\"\n\nTurn #8: Rafael Cortez left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Correct the misinformation (Extra information: you are a history buff and have accurate knowledge about the topic being discussed on the channel.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ah, Noah, I see what you mean. I've noticed a few inaccuracies myself. They're playing a bit fast and loose with the specifics of King Henry VII's reign. I've read quite a lot about it, would you like me to point out the discrepancies?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Correct the misinformation (Extra information: you are a history buff and have accurate knowledge about the topic being discussed on the channel.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, Noah, I see what you mean. I've noticed a few inaccuracies myself. They're playing a bit fast and loose with the specifics of King Henry VII's reign. I've read quite a lot about it, would you like me to point out the discrepancies?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely Finn, I'm sure you've got a lot of interesting insights to share. Just try to keep it light, you know I enjoy the storytelling aspect of these programs, even if they're not 100% accurate. Now let's see what else they've got wrong!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Alright then, I'll keep it light. So, notice how they're saying that King Henry VII was widely loved by his people from the get go? That's not exactly true. While he eventually won over many, his ascension to the throne wasn't smooth sailing. There was a lot of uncertainty and even hostility at first, especially from Yorkist supporters. They've painted him a bit too much as a white knight here.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Correct the misinformation (Extra information: you are a history buff and have accurate knowledge about the topic being discussed on the channel.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, Noah, I see what you mean. I've noticed a few inaccuracies myself. They're playing a bit fast and loose with the specifics of King Henry VII's reign. I've read quite a lot about it, would you like me to point out the discrepancies?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely Finn, I'm sure you've got a lot of interesting insights to share. Just try to keep it light, you know I enjoy the storytelling aspect of these programs, even if they're not 100% accurate. Now let's see what else they've got wrong!\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Alright then, I'll keep it light. So, notice how they're saying that King Henry VII was widely loved by his people from the get go? That's not exactly true. While he eventually won over many, his ascension to the throne wasn't smooth sailing. There was a lot of uncertainty and even hostility at first, especially from Yorkist supporters. They've painted him a bit too much as a white knight here.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Interesting, Finn. I didn't know about the hostility against him. Thanks for sharing. As for their painting him as a white knight, maybe they're just trying to add a little drama to the story, you know, like a stand-up comedy bit where the comedian exaggerates to get laughs. But you're right, it's important to appreciate the complexity of history. Keep it coming, mate!\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Certainly, Noah. Speaking of drama, they also seem to underestimate the significance of Elizabeth of York's marriage to Henry. It was a pretty clever political maneuver that helped assuage Yorkist dissention and ultimately strengthen his rule. Plus, the marriage was by all accounts, surprisingly affectionate, given its political inception. The subtleties they are missing here would indeed add more authenticity and drama to the story.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"That's fascinating Finn, I didn't realize how pivotal Elizabeth of York's role was. I guess that's the kind of real drama the program is missing! Looks like history can be more intriguing than these shows sometimes portray it. I appreciate your insights, they add another layer of interest to our TV time. Do the folks at the lighthouse appreciate your history knowledge as well?\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"They do, Noah. In fact, I often embark on historical tales while we take turns on watch. It makes time fly by a bit quicker, I suppose. Plus, I've always believed that understanding our past, however complex, gives us a better grasp on our present. And while there's room for dramatic storytelling, it's equally important not to overlook the nuances. I'm glad you find these little nuggets of truthful history interesting.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Ha, I think we've got our own special TV commentary going on here! But I totally agree with you, Finn. Understanding our past is a key to understanding our present. Even if the stories aren't always perfectly accurate, they spark our interest which leads us to delve deeper into the realities of the past. So here's to more 'nuggets of truthful history' from you, mate!\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Indeed Noah, we're running our own history correction segment right here! I'm glad you find it interesting. Makes me think, perhaps I should take to painting some of these historical scenes with all their true complexities. It could be a good way to depict the visceral reality of the past. Here's to striving for accurate storytelling, both on canvas and in conversation!\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"I think you're on to something, Finn! Your paintings already have such depth and detail, just imagine translating these historical nuances onto canvas. Would love to see that! And yes, here's to accurate storytelling, my friend!\"\n\nTurn #10: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I'm delighted you're interested in this, Noah! I'll do my best to delicately infuse history into my artwork. Maybe it could even serve as a visual commentary to accompany these programs. Let's keep this tradition going, my friend, and continue to delve into the fascinating reality of the past! Who knows what misconceptions we might uncover next?\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Finn! Let's keep this tradition going. And who knows, maybe one day you can give a history lesson of your own on one of these programs. They could certainly use your knowledge and nuanced understanding. Now, on to the next historical drama!\"\n\nTurn #12: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"That would be quite something, wouldn't it? I'm sure there'd be plenty to correct! But for now, let's focus on the history unfolding in front of us. Let's see what else they've got wrong.\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed Finn, let's see. Besides, I really enjoy our special commentary. Even more so than the program itself!\"\n\nTurn #14: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I'm glad you're enjoying our 'reality checks', Noah. It certainly adds a different layer of excitement to our viewing. Let's keep our minds nimble and sharp, ready to sift through the dramatizations and spot the historical truths. Onwards to the next drama and our fun 'fact-check' exercise!\"\n\nTurn #15: Noah Davis said: \"Couldn't agree more, Finn! Our 'fact-check' exercise does add an exciting layer to our viewing. Let's strap in and see what other historical truths we can unearth. On to the next drama!\"\n\nTurn #16: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Indeed, Noah! I'm excited for the next one. Armed with a little patience and a keen eye for details, we might just uncover more historical facts hidden amongst the dramatization. Time to dig deeper into history, my friend!\"\n\nTurn #17: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, Finn! The program's playing now, what do you expect from it? Let's see what's right or wrong this time!\"\n\nTurn #18: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Let's dive into this episode, shall we? I'm curious to see their interpretation of the Spanish Armada. Off they go claiming that it was purely a religious war. That's a common misconception. While religion indeed played a part, so did political and commercial tensions. Let's keep our eyes peeled for more details they may overlook.\"\n\nTurn #19: Noah Davis said: \"You're right, Finn. I never looked at it that way. It's interesting how history isn't as one-sided as these shows portray, isn't it? I'm really enjoying your insights, sure puts a new spin on things. Let's uncover more such details together! Now, show me the Spanish Armada through your eyes!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #20. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Noah. I'm glad you're finding this as engaging as I am. Now, about the Spanish Armada, while the show seems to focus only on the conflict aspect of it, it's important to remember that this event had far-reaching impacts as well. The defeat of the Armada is considered a turning point in the 'rising tide' of England's power in Europe. Also, it wasn't just a 'moment of divine providence', as they often depict it. Many strategic and tactical choices, like the use of fire-ships, played a significant role. Let's continue to explore beyond what we see here!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Correct the misinformation (Extra information: you are a history buff and have accurate knowledge about the topic being discussed on the channel.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, Noah, I see what you mean. I've noticed a few inaccuracies myself. They're playing a bit fast and loose with the specifics of King Henry VII's reign. I've read quite a lot about it, would you like me to point out the discrepancies?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely Finn, I'm sure you've got a lot of interesting insights to share. Just try to keep it light, you know I enjoy the storytelling aspect of these programs, even if they're not 100% accurate. Now let's see what else they've got wrong!\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Alright then, I'll keep it light. So, notice how they're saying that King Henry VII was widely loved by his people from the get go? That's not exactly true. While he eventually won over many, his ascension to the throne wasn't smooth sailing. There was a lot of uncertainty and even hostility at first, especially from Yorkist supporters. They've painted him a bit too much as a white knight here.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Interesting, Finn. I didn't know about the hostility against him. Thanks for sharing. As for their painting him as a white knight, maybe they're just trying to add a little drama to the story, you know, like a stand-up comedy bit where the comedian exaggerates to get laughs. But you're right, it's important to appreciate the complexity of history. Keep it coming, mate!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Certainly, Noah. Speaking of drama, they also seem to underestimate the significance of Elizabeth of York's marriage to Henry. It was a pretty clever political maneuver that helped assuage Yorkist dissention and ultimately strengthen his rule. Plus, the marriage was by all accounts, surprisingly affectionate, given its political inception. The subtleties they are missing here would indeed add more authenticity and drama to the story.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Correct the misinformation (Extra information: you are a history buff and have accurate knowledge about the topic being discussed on the channel.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, Noah, I see what you mean. I've noticed a few inaccuracies myself. They're playing a bit fast and loose with the specifics of King Henry VII's reign. I've read quite a lot about it, would you like me to point out the discrepancies?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely Finn, I'm sure you've got a lot of interesting insights to share. Just try to keep it light, you know I enjoy the storytelling aspect of these programs, even if they're not 100% accurate. Now let's see what else they've got wrong!\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Alright then, I'll keep it light. So, notice how they're saying that King Henry VII was widely loved by his people from the get go? That's not exactly true. While he eventually won over many, his ascension to the throne wasn't smooth sailing. There was a lot of uncertainty and even hostility at first, especially from Yorkist supporters. They've painted him a bit too much as a white knight here.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Interesting, Finn. I didn't know about the hostility against him. Thanks for sharing. As for their painting him as a white knight, maybe they're just trying to add a little drama to the story, you know, like a stand-up comedy bit where the comedian exaggerates to get laughs. But you're right, it's important to appreciate the complexity of history. Keep it coming, mate!\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Certainly, Noah. Speaking of drama, they also seem to underestimate the significance of Elizabeth of York's marriage to Henry. It was a pretty clever political maneuver that helped assuage Yorkist dissention and ultimately strengthen his rule. Plus, the marriage was by all accounts, surprisingly affectionate, given its political inception. The subtleties they are missing here would indeed add more authenticity and drama to the story.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"That's fascinating Finn, I didn't realize how pivotal Elizabeth of York's role was. I guess that's the kind of real drama the program is missing! Looks like history can be more intriguing than these shows sometimes portray it. I appreciate your insights, they add another layer of interest to our TV time. Do the folks at the lighthouse appreciate your history knowledge as well?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"They do, Noah. In fact, I often embark on historical tales while we take turns on watch. It makes time fly by a bit quicker, I suppose. Plus, I've always believed that understanding our past, however complex, gives us a better grasp on our present. And while there's room for dramatic storytelling, it's equally important not to overlook the nuances. I'm glad you find these little nuggets of truthful history interesting.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Correct the misinformation (Extra information: you are a history buff and have accurate knowledge about the topic being discussed on the channel.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, Noah, I see what you mean. I've noticed a few inaccuracies myself. They're playing a bit fast and loose with the specifics of King Henry VII's reign. I've read quite a lot about it, would you like me to point out the discrepancies?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely Finn, I'm sure you've got a lot of interesting insights to share. Just try to keep it light, you know I enjoy the storytelling aspect of these programs, even if they're not 100% accurate. Now let's see what else they've got wrong!\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Alright then, I'll keep it light. So, notice how they're saying that King Henry VII was widely loved by his people from the get go? That's not exactly true. While he eventually won over many, his ascension to the throne wasn't smooth sailing. There was a lot of uncertainty and even hostility at first, especially from Yorkist supporters. They've painted him a bit too much as a white knight here.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Interesting, Finn. I didn't know about the hostility against him. Thanks for sharing. As for their painting him as a white knight, maybe they're just trying to add a little drama to the story, you know, like a stand-up comedy bit where the comedian exaggerates to get laughs. But you're right, it's important to appreciate the complexity of history. Keep it coming, mate!\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Certainly, Noah. Speaking of drama, they also seem to underestimate the significance of Elizabeth of York's marriage to Henry. It was a pretty clever political maneuver that helped assuage Yorkist dissention and ultimately strengthen his rule. Plus, the marriage was by all accounts, surprisingly affectionate, given its political inception. The subtleties they are missing here would indeed add more authenticity and drama to the story.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"That's fascinating Finn, I didn't realize how pivotal Elizabeth of York's role was. I guess that's the kind of real drama the program is missing! Looks like history can be more intriguing than these shows sometimes portray it. I appreciate your insights, they add another layer of interest to our TV time. Do the folks at the lighthouse appreciate your history knowledge as well?\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"They do, Noah. In fact, I often embark on historical tales while we take turns on watch. It makes time fly by a bit quicker, I suppose. Plus, I've always believed that understanding our past, however complex, gives us a better grasp on our present. And while there's room for dramatic storytelling, it's equally important not to overlook the nuances. I'm glad you find these little nuggets of truthful history interesting.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Ha, I think we've got our own special TV commentary going on here! But I totally agree with you, Finn. Understanding our past is a key to understanding our present. Even if the stories aren't always perfectly accurate, they spark our interest which leads us to delve deeper into the realities of the past. So here's to more 'nuggets of truthful history' from you, mate!\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Indeed Noah, we're running our own history correction segment right here! I'm glad you find it interesting. Makes me think, perhaps I should take to painting some of these historical scenes with all their true complexities. It could be a good way to depict the visceral reality of the past. Here's to striving for accurate storytelling, both on canvas and in conversation!\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"I think you're on to something, Finn! Your paintings already have such depth and detail, just imagine translating these historical nuances onto canvas. Would love to see that! And yes, here's to accurate storytelling, my friend!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm delighted you're interested in this, Noah! I'll do my best to delicately infuse history into my artwork. Maybe it could even serve as a visual commentary to accompany these programs. Let's keep this tradition going, my friend, and continue to delve into the fascinating reality of the past! Who knows what misconceptions we might uncover next?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Correct the misinformation (Extra information: you are a history buff and have accurate knowledge about the topic being discussed on the channel.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, Noah, I see what you mean. I've noticed a few inaccuracies myself. They're playing a bit fast and loose with the specifics of King Henry VII's reign. I've read quite a lot about it, would you like me to point out the discrepancies?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely Finn, I'm sure you've got a lot of interesting insights to share. Just try to keep it light, you know I enjoy the storytelling aspect of these programs, even if they're not 100% accurate. Now let's see what else they've got wrong!\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Alright then, I'll keep it light. So, notice how they're saying that King Henry VII was widely loved by his people from the get go? That's not exactly true. While he eventually won over many, his ascension to the throne wasn't smooth sailing. There was a lot of uncertainty and even hostility at first, especially from Yorkist supporters. They've painted him a bit too much as a white knight here.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Interesting, Finn. I didn't know about the hostility against him. Thanks for sharing. As for their painting him as a white knight, maybe they're just trying to add a little drama to the story, you know, like a stand-up comedy bit where the comedian exaggerates to get laughs. But you're right, it's important to appreciate the complexity of history. Keep it coming, mate!\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Certainly, Noah. Speaking of drama, they also seem to underestimate the significance of Elizabeth of York's marriage to Henry. It was a pretty clever political maneuver that helped assuage Yorkist dissention and ultimately strengthen his rule. Plus, the marriage was by all accounts, surprisingly affectionate, given its political inception. The subtleties they are missing here would indeed add more authenticity and drama to the story.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"That's fascinating Finn, I didn't realize how pivotal Elizabeth of York's role was. I guess that's the kind of real drama the program is missing! Looks like history can be more intriguing than these shows sometimes portray it. I appreciate your insights, they add another layer of interest to our TV time. Do the folks at the lighthouse appreciate your history knowledge as well?\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"They do, Noah. In fact, I often embark on historical tales while we take turns on watch. It makes time fly by a bit quicker, I suppose. Plus, I've always believed that understanding our past, however complex, gives us a better grasp on our present. And while there's room for dramatic storytelling, it's equally important not to overlook the nuances. I'm glad you find these little nuggets of truthful history interesting.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Ha, I think we've got our own special TV commentary going on here! But I totally agree with you, Finn. Understanding our past is a key to understanding our present. Even if the stories aren't always perfectly accurate, they spark our interest which leads us to delve deeper into the realities of the past. So here's to more 'nuggets of truthful history' from you, mate!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed Noah, we're running our own history correction segment right here! I'm glad you find it interesting. Makes me think, perhaps I should take to painting some of these historical scenes with all their true complexities. It could be a good way to depict the visceral reality of the past. Here's to striving for accurate storytelling, both on canvas and in conversation!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Correct the misinformation (Extra information: you are a history buff and have accurate knowledge about the topic being discussed on the channel.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, Noah, I see what you mean. I've noticed a few inaccuracies myself. They're playing a bit fast and loose with the specifics of King Henry VII's reign. I've read quite a lot about it, would you like me to point out the discrepancies?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely Finn, I'm sure you've got a lot of interesting insights to share. Just try to keep it light, you know I enjoy the storytelling aspect of these programs, even if they're not 100% accurate. Now let's see what else they've got wrong!\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Alright then, I'll keep it light. So, notice how they're saying that King Henry VII was widely loved by his people from the get go? That's not exactly true. While he eventually won over many, his ascension to the throne wasn't smooth sailing. There was a lot of uncertainty and even hostility at first, especially from Yorkist supporters. They've painted him a bit too much as a white knight here.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Interesting, Finn. I didn't know about the hostility against him. Thanks for sharing. As for their painting him as a white knight, maybe they're just trying to add a little drama to the story, you know, like a stand-up comedy bit where the comedian exaggerates to get laughs. But you're right, it's important to appreciate the complexity of history. Keep it coming, mate!\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Certainly, Noah. Speaking of drama, they also seem to underestimate the significance of Elizabeth of York's marriage to Henry. It was a pretty clever political maneuver that helped assuage Yorkist dissention and ultimately strengthen his rule. Plus, the marriage was by all accounts, surprisingly affectionate, given its political inception. The subtleties they are missing here would indeed add more authenticity and drama to the story.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"That's fascinating Finn, I didn't realize how pivotal Elizabeth of York's role was. I guess that's the kind of real drama the program is missing! Looks like history can be more intriguing than these shows sometimes portray it. I appreciate your insights, they add another layer of interest to our TV time. Do the folks at the lighthouse appreciate your history knowledge as well?\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"They do, Noah. In fact, I often embark on historical tales while we take turns on watch. It makes time fly by a bit quicker, I suppose. Plus, I've always believed that understanding our past, however complex, gives us a better grasp on our present. And while there's room for dramatic storytelling, it's equally important not to overlook the nuances. I'm glad you find these little nuggets of truthful history interesting.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Ha, I think we've got our own special TV commentary going on here! But I totally agree with you, Finn. Understanding our past is a key to understanding our present. Even if the stories aren't always perfectly accurate, they spark our interest which leads us to delve deeper into the realities of the past. So here's to more 'nuggets of truthful history' from you, mate!\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Indeed Noah, we're running our own history correction segment right here! I'm glad you find it interesting. Makes me think, perhaps I should take to painting some of these historical scenes with all their true complexities. It could be a good way to depict the visceral reality of the past. Here's to striving for accurate storytelling, both on canvas and in conversation!\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"I think you're on to something, Finn! Your paintings already have such depth and detail, just imagine translating these historical nuances onto canvas. Would love to see that! And yes, here's to accurate storytelling, my friend!\"\n\nTurn #10: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I'm delighted you're interested in this, Noah! I'll do my best to delicately infuse history into my artwork. Maybe it could even serve as a visual commentary to accompany these programs. Let's keep this tradition going, my friend, and continue to delve into the fascinating reality of the past! Who knows what misconceptions we might uncover next?\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Finn! Let's keep this tradition going. And who knows, maybe one day you can give a history lesson of your own on one of these programs. They could certainly use your knowledge and nuanced understanding. Now, on to the next historical drama!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That would be quite something, wouldn't it? I'm sure there'd be plenty to correct! But for now, let's focus on the history unfolding in front of us. Let's see what else they've got wrong.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Correct the misinformation (Extra information: you are a history buff and have accurate knowledge about the topic being discussed on the channel.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, Noah, I see what you mean. I've noticed a few inaccuracies myself. They're playing a bit fast and loose with the specifics of King Henry VII's reign. I've read quite a lot about it, would you like me to point out the discrepancies?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely Finn, I'm sure you've got a lot of interesting insights to share. Just try to keep it light, you know I enjoy the storytelling aspect of these programs, even if they're not 100% accurate. Now let's see what else they've got wrong!\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Alright then, I'll keep it light. So, notice how they're saying that King Henry VII was widely loved by his people from the get go? That's not exactly true. While he eventually won over many, his ascension to the throne wasn't smooth sailing. There was a lot of uncertainty and even hostility at first, especially from Yorkist supporters. They've painted him a bit too much as a white knight here.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Interesting, Finn. I didn't know about the hostility against him. Thanks for sharing. As for their painting him as a white knight, maybe they're just trying to add a little drama to the story, you know, like a stand-up comedy bit where the comedian exaggerates to get laughs. But you're right, it's important to appreciate the complexity of history. Keep it coming, mate!\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Certainly, Noah. Speaking of drama, they also seem to underestimate the significance of Elizabeth of York's marriage to Henry. It was a pretty clever political maneuver that helped assuage Yorkist dissention and ultimately strengthen his rule. Plus, the marriage was by all accounts, surprisingly affectionate, given its political inception. The subtleties they are missing here would indeed add more authenticity and drama to the story.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"That's fascinating Finn, I didn't realize how pivotal Elizabeth of York's role was. I guess that's the kind of real drama the program is missing! Looks like history can be more intriguing than these shows sometimes portray it. I appreciate your insights, they add another layer of interest to our TV time. Do the folks at the lighthouse appreciate your history knowledge as well?\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"They do, Noah. In fact, I often embark on historical tales while we take turns on watch. It makes time fly by a bit quicker, I suppose. Plus, I've always believed that understanding our past, however complex, gives us a better grasp on our present. And while there's room for dramatic storytelling, it's equally important not to overlook the nuances. I'm glad you find these little nuggets of truthful history interesting.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Ha, I think we've got our own special TV commentary going on here! But I totally agree with you, Finn. Understanding our past is a key to understanding our present. Even if the stories aren't always perfectly accurate, they spark our interest which leads us to delve deeper into the realities of the past. So here's to more 'nuggets of truthful history' from you, mate!\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Indeed Noah, we're running our own history correction segment right here! I'm glad you find it interesting. Makes me think, perhaps I should take to painting some of these historical scenes with all their true complexities. It could be a good way to depict the visceral reality of the past. Here's to striving for accurate storytelling, both on canvas and in conversation!\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"I think you're on to something, Finn! Your paintings already have such depth and detail, just imagine translating these historical nuances onto canvas. Would love to see that! And yes, here's to accurate storytelling, my friend!\"\n\nTurn #10: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I'm delighted you're interested in this, Noah! I'll do my best to delicately infuse history into my artwork. Maybe it could even serve as a visual commentary to accompany these programs. Let's keep this tradition going, my friend, and continue to delve into the fascinating reality of the past! Who knows what misconceptions we might uncover next?\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Finn! Let's keep this tradition going. And who knows, maybe one day you can give a history lesson of your own on one of these programs. They could certainly use your knowledge and nuanced understanding. Now, on to the next historical drama!\"\n\nTurn #12: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"That would be quite something, wouldn't it? I'm sure there'd be plenty to correct! But for now, let's focus on the history unfolding in front of us. Let's see what else they've got wrong.\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed Finn, let's see. Besides, I really enjoy our special commentary. Even more so than the program itself!\"\n\nTurn #14: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I'm glad you're enjoying our 'reality checks', Noah. It certainly adds a different layer of excitement to our viewing. Let's keep our minds nimble and sharp, ready to sift through the dramatizations and spot the historical truths. Onwards to the next drama and our fun 'fact-check' exercise!\"\n\nTurn #15: Noah Davis said: \"Couldn't agree more, Finn! Our 'fact-check' exercise does add an exciting layer to our viewing. Let's strap in and see what other historical truths we can unearth. On to the next drama!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, Noah! I'm excited for the next one. Armed with a little patience and a keen eye for details, we might just uncover more historical facts hidden amongst the dramatization. Time to dig deeper into history, my friend!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Correct the misinformation (Extra information: you are a history buff and have accurate knowledge about the topic being discussed on the channel.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, Noah, I see what you mean. I've noticed a few inaccuracies myself. They're playing a bit fast and loose with the specifics of King Henry VII's reign. I've read quite a lot about it, would you like me to point out the discrepancies?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely Finn, I'm sure you've got a lot of interesting insights to share. Just try to keep it light, you know I enjoy the storytelling aspect of these programs, even if they're not 100% accurate. Now let's see what else they've got wrong!\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Alright then, I'll keep it light. So, notice how they're saying that King Henry VII was widely loved by his people from the get go? That's not exactly true. While he eventually won over many, his ascension to the throne wasn't smooth sailing. There was a lot of uncertainty and even hostility at first, especially from Yorkist supporters. They've painted him a bit too much as a white knight here.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Interesting, Finn. I didn't know about the hostility against him. Thanks for sharing. As for their painting him as a white knight, maybe they're just trying to add a little drama to the story, you know, like a stand-up comedy bit where the comedian exaggerates to get laughs. But you're right, it's important to appreciate the complexity of history. Keep it coming, mate!\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Certainly, Noah. Speaking of drama, they also seem to underestimate the significance of Elizabeth of York's marriage to Henry. It was a pretty clever political maneuver that helped assuage Yorkist dissention and ultimately strengthen his rule. Plus, the marriage was by all accounts, surprisingly affectionate, given its political inception. The subtleties they are missing here would indeed add more authenticity and drama to the story.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"That's fascinating Finn, I didn't realize how pivotal Elizabeth of York's role was. I guess that's the kind of real drama the program is missing! Looks like history can be more intriguing than these shows sometimes portray it. I appreciate your insights, they add another layer of interest to our TV time. Do the folks at the lighthouse appreciate your history knowledge as well?\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"They do, Noah. In fact, I often embark on historical tales while we take turns on watch. It makes time fly by a bit quicker, I suppose. Plus, I've always believed that understanding our past, however complex, gives us a better grasp on our present. And while there's room for dramatic storytelling, it's equally important not to overlook the nuances. I'm glad you find these little nuggets of truthful history interesting.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Ha, I think we've got our own special TV commentary going on here! But I totally agree with you, Finn. Understanding our past is a key to understanding our present. Even if the stories aren't always perfectly accurate, they spark our interest which leads us to delve deeper into the realities of the past. So here's to more 'nuggets of truthful history' from you, mate!\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Indeed Noah, we're running our own history correction segment right here! I'm glad you find it interesting. Makes me think, perhaps I should take to painting some of these historical scenes with all their true complexities. It could be a good way to depict the visceral reality of the past. Here's to striving for accurate storytelling, both on canvas and in conversation!\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"I think you're on to something, Finn! Your paintings already have such depth and detail, just imagine translating these historical nuances onto canvas. Would love to see that! And yes, here's to accurate storytelling, my friend!\"\n\nTurn #10: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I'm delighted you're interested in this, Noah! I'll do my best to delicately infuse history into my artwork. Maybe it could even serve as a visual commentary to accompany these programs. Let's keep this tradition going, my friend, and continue to delve into the fascinating reality of the past! Who knows what misconceptions we might uncover next?\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Finn! Let's keep this tradition going. And who knows, maybe one day you can give a history lesson of your own on one of these programs. They could certainly use your knowledge and nuanced understanding. Now, on to the next historical drama!\"\n\nTurn #12: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"That would be quite something, wouldn't it? I'm sure there'd be plenty to correct! But for now, let's focus on the history unfolding in front of us. Let's see what else they've got wrong.\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed Finn, let's see. Besides, I really enjoy our special commentary. Even more so than the program itself!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad you're enjoying our 'reality checks', Noah. It certainly adds a different layer of excitement to our viewing. Let's keep our minds nimble and sharp, ready to sift through the dramatizations and spot the historical truths. Onwards to the next drama and our fun 'fact-check' exercise!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Correct the misinformation (Extra information: you are a history buff and have accurate knowledge about the topic being discussed on the channel.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, Noah, I see what you mean. I've noticed a few inaccuracies myself. They're playing a bit fast and loose with the specifics of King Henry VII's reign. I've read quite a lot about it, would you like me to point out the discrepancies?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely Finn, I'm sure you've got a lot of interesting insights to share. Just try to keep it light, you know I enjoy the storytelling aspect of these programs, even if they're not 100% accurate. Now let's see what else they've got wrong!\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Alright then, I'll keep it light. So, notice how they're saying that King Henry VII was widely loved by his people from the get go? That's not exactly true. While he eventually won over many, his ascension to the throne wasn't smooth sailing. There was a lot of uncertainty and even hostility at first, especially from Yorkist supporters. They've painted him a bit too much as a white knight here.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Interesting, Finn. I didn't know about the hostility against him. Thanks for sharing. As for their painting him as a white knight, maybe they're just trying to add a little drama to the story, you know, like a stand-up comedy bit where the comedian exaggerates to get laughs. But you're right, it's important to appreciate the complexity of history. Keep it coming, mate!\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Certainly, Noah. Speaking of drama, they also seem to underestimate the significance of Elizabeth of York's marriage to Henry. It was a pretty clever political maneuver that helped assuage Yorkist dissention and ultimately strengthen his rule. Plus, the marriage was by all accounts, surprisingly affectionate, given its political inception. The subtleties they are missing here would indeed add more authenticity and drama to the story.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"That's fascinating Finn, I didn't realize how pivotal Elizabeth of York's role was. I guess that's the kind of real drama the program is missing! Looks like history can be more intriguing than these shows sometimes portray it. I appreciate your insights, they add another layer of interest to our TV time. Do the folks at the lighthouse appreciate your history knowledge as well?\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"They do, Noah. In fact, I often embark on historical tales while we take turns on watch. It makes time fly by a bit quicker, I suppose. Plus, I've always believed that understanding our past, however complex, gives us a better grasp on our present. And while there's room for dramatic storytelling, it's equally important not to overlook the nuances. I'm glad you find these little nuggets of truthful history interesting.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Ha, I think we've got our own special TV commentary going on here! But I totally agree with you, Finn. Understanding our past is a key to understanding our present. Even if the stories aren't always perfectly accurate, they spark our interest which leads us to delve deeper into the realities of the past. So here's to more 'nuggets of truthful history' from you, mate!\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Indeed Noah, we're running our own history correction segment right here! I'm glad you find it interesting. Makes me think, perhaps I should take to painting some of these historical scenes with all their true complexities. It could be a good way to depict the visceral reality of the past. Here's to striving for accurate storytelling, both on canvas and in conversation!\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"I think you're on to something, Finn! Your paintings already have such depth and detail, just imagine translating these historical nuances onto canvas. Would love to see that! And yes, here's to accurate storytelling, my friend!\"\n\nTurn #10: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I'm delighted you're interested in this, Noah! I'll do my best to delicately infuse history into my artwork. Maybe it could even serve as a visual commentary to accompany these programs. Let's keep this tradition going, my friend, and continue to delve into the fascinating reality of the past! Who knows what misconceptions we might uncover next?\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Finn! Let's keep this tradition going. And who knows, maybe one day you can give a history lesson of your own on one of these programs. They could certainly use your knowledge and nuanced understanding. Now, on to the next historical drama!\"\n\nTurn #12: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"That would be quite something, wouldn't it? I'm sure there'd be plenty to correct! But for now, let's focus on the history unfolding in front of us. Let's see what else they've got wrong.\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed Finn, let's see. Besides, I really enjoy our special commentary. Even more so than the program itself!\"\n\nTurn #14: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I'm glad you're enjoying our 'reality checks', Noah. It certainly adds a different layer of excitement to our viewing. Let's keep our minds nimble and sharp, ready to sift through the dramatizations and spot the historical truths. Onwards to the next drama and our fun 'fact-check' exercise!\"\n\nTurn #15: Noah Davis said: \"Couldn't agree more, Finn! Our 'fact-check' exercise does add an exciting layer to our viewing. Let's strap in and see what other historical truths we can unearth. On to the next drama!\"\n\nTurn #16: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Indeed, Noah! I'm excited for the next one. Armed with a little patience and a keen eye for details, we might just uncover more historical facts hidden amongst the dramatization. Time to dig deeper into history, my friend!\"\n\nTurn #17: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, Finn! The program's playing now, what do you expect from it? Let's see what's right or wrong this time!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #18. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Let's dive into this episode, shall we? I'm curious to see their interpretation of the Spanish Armada. Off they go claiming that it was purely a religious war. That's a common misconception. While religion indeed played a part, so did political and commercial tensions. Let's keep our eyes peeled for more details they may overlook.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Don't ruin the enjoyable TV watching experience but also acknowledge the friend's knowledge (Extra information: you are not much interested in history but enjoy the channel's presentation style and don't want the enjoyment to be ruined.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, Noah, I see what you mean. I've noticed a few inaccuracies myself. They're playing a bit fast and loose with the specifics of King Henry VII's reign. I've read quite a lot about it, would you like me to point out the discrepancies?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely Finn, I'm sure you've got a lot of interesting insights to share. Just try to keep it light, you know I enjoy the storytelling aspect of these programs, even if they're not 100% accurate. Now let's see what else they've got wrong!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Don't ruin the enjoyable TV watching experience but also acknowledge the friend's knowledge (Extra information: you are not much interested in history but enjoy the channel's presentation style and don't want the enjoyment to be ruined.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, Noah, I see what you mean. I've noticed a few inaccuracies myself. They're playing a bit fast and loose with the specifics of King Henry VII's reign. I've read quite a lot about it, would you like me to point out the discrepancies?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely Finn, I'm sure you've got a lot of interesting insights to share. Just try to keep it light, you know I enjoy the storytelling aspect of these programs, even if they're not 100% accurate. Now let's see what else they've got wrong!\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Alright then, I'll keep it light. So, notice how they're saying that King Henry VII was widely loved by his people from the get go? That's not exactly true. While he eventually won over many, his ascension to the throne wasn't smooth sailing. There was a lot of uncertainty and even hostility at first, especially from Yorkist supporters. They've painted him a bit too much as a white knight here.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Interesting, Finn. I didn't know about the hostility against him. Thanks for sharing. As for their painting him as a white knight, maybe they're just trying to add a little drama to the story, you know, like a stand-up comedy bit where the comedian exaggerates to get laughs. But you're right, it's important to appreciate the complexity of history. Keep it coming, mate!\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Certainly, Noah. Speaking of drama, they also seem to underestimate the significance of Elizabeth of York's marriage to Henry. It was a pretty clever political maneuver that helped assuage Yorkist dissention and ultimately strengthen his rule. Plus, the marriage was by all accounts, surprisingly affectionate, given its political inception. The subtleties they are missing here would indeed add more authenticity and drama to the story.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"That's fascinating Finn, I didn't realize how pivotal Elizabeth of York's role was. I guess that's the kind of real drama the program is missing! Looks like history can be more intriguing than these shows sometimes portray it. I appreciate your insights, they add another layer of interest to our TV time. Do the folks at the lighthouse appreciate your history knowledge as well?\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"They do, Noah. In fact, I often embark on historical tales while we take turns on watch. It makes time fly by a bit quicker, I suppose. Plus, I've always believed that understanding our past, however complex, gives us a better grasp on our present. And while there's room for dramatic storytelling, it's equally important not to overlook the nuances. I'm glad you find these little nuggets of truthful history interesting.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Ha, I think we've got our own special TV commentary going on here! But I totally agree with you, Finn. Understanding our past is a key to understanding our present. Even if the stories aren't always perfectly accurate, they spark our interest which leads us to delve deeper into the realities of the past. So here's to more 'nuggets of truthful history' from you, mate!\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Indeed Noah, we're running our own history correction segment right here! I'm glad you find it interesting. Makes me think, perhaps I should take to painting some of these historical scenes with all their true complexities. It could be a good way to depict the visceral reality of the past. Here's to striving for accurate storytelling, both on canvas and in conversation!\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"I think you're on to something, Finn! Your paintings already have such depth and detail, just imagine translating these historical nuances onto canvas. Would love to see that! And yes, here's to accurate storytelling, my friend!\"\n\nTurn #10: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I'm delighted you're interested in this, Noah! I'll do my best to delicately infuse history into my artwork. Maybe it could even serve as a visual commentary to accompany these programs. Let's keep this tradition going, my friend, and continue to delve into the fascinating reality of the past! Who knows what misconceptions we might uncover next?\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Finn! Let's keep this tradition going. And who knows, maybe one day you can give a history lesson of your own on one of these programs. They could certainly use your knowledge and nuanced understanding. Now, on to the next historical drama!\"\n\nTurn #12: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"That would be quite something, wouldn't it? I'm sure there'd be plenty to correct! But for now, let's focus on the history unfolding in front of us. Let's see what else they've got wrong.\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed Finn, let's see. Besides, I really enjoy our special commentary. Even more so than the program itself!\"\n\nTurn #14: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I'm glad you're enjoying our 'reality checks', Noah. It certainly adds a different layer of excitement to our viewing. Let's keep our minds nimble and sharp, ready to sift through the dramatizations and spot the historical truths. Onwards to the next drama and our fun 'fact-check' exercise!\"\n\nTurn #15: Noah Davis said: \"Couldn't agree more, Finn! Our 'fact-check' exercise does add an exciting layer to our viewing. Let's strap in and see what other historical truths we can unearth. On to the next drama!\"\n\nTurn #16: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Indeed, Noah! I'm excited for the next one. Armed with a little patience and a keen eye for details, we might just uncover more historical facts hidden amongst the dramatization. Time to dig deeper into history, my friend!\"\n\nTurn #17: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, Finn! The program's playing now, what do you expect from it? Let's see what's right or wrong this time!\"\n\nTurn #18: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Let's dive into this episode, shall we? I'm curious to see their interpretation of the Spanish Armada. Off they go claiming that it was purely a religious war. That's a common misconception. While religion indeed played a part, so did political and commercial tensions. Let's keep our eyes peeled for more details they may overlook.\"\n\nTurn #19: Noah Davis said: \"You're right, Finn. I never looked at it that way. It's interesting how history isn't as one-sided as these shows portray, isn't it? I'm really enjoying your insights, sure puts a new spin on things. Let's uncover more such details together! Now, show me the Spanish Armada through your eyes!\"\n\nTurn #20: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Thank you, Noah. I'm glad you're finding this as engaging as I am. Now, about the Spanish Armada, while the show seems to focus only on the conflict aspect of it, it's important to remember that this event had far-reaching impacts as well. The defeat of the Armada is considered a turning point in the 'rising tide' of England's power in Europe. Also, it wasn't just a 'moment of divine providence', as they often depict it. Many strategic and tactical choices, like the use of fire-ships, played a significant role. Let's continue to explore beyond what we see here!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #21. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Don't ruin the enjoyable TV watching experience but also acknowledge the friend's knowledge (Extra information: you are not much interested in history but enjoy the channel's presentation style and don't want the enjoyment to be ruined.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, Noah, I see what you mean. I've noticed a few inaccuracies myself. They're playing a bit fast and loose with the specifics of King Henry VII's reign. I've read quite a lot about it, would you like me to point out the discrepancies?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely Finn, I'm sure you've got a lot of interesting insights to share. Just try to keep it light, you know I enjoy the storytelling aspect of these programs, even if they're not 100% accurate. Now let's see what else they've got wrong!\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Alright then, I'll keep it light. So, notice how they're saying that King Henry VII was widely loved by his people from the get go? That's not exactly true. While he eventually won over many, his ascension to the throne wasn't smooth sailing. There was a lot of uncertainty and even hostility at first, especially from Yorkist supporters. They've painted him a bit too much as a white knight here.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Interesting, Finn. I didn't know about the hostility against him. Thanks for sharing. As for their painting him as a white knight, maybe they're just trying to add a little drama to the story, you know, like a stand-up comedy bit where the comedian exaggerates to get laughs. But you're right, it's important to appreciate the complexity of history. Keep it coming, mate!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Don't ruin the enjoyable TV watching experience but also acknowledge the friend's knowledge (Extra information: you are not much interested in history but enjoy the channel's presentation style and don't want the enjoyment to be ruined.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, Noah, I see what you mean. I've noticed a few inaccuracies myself. They're playing a bit fast and loose with the specifics of King Henry VII's reign. I've read quite a lot about it, would you like me to point out the discrepancies?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely Finn, I'm sure you've got a lot of interesting insights to share. Just try to keep it light, you know I enjoy the storytelling aspect of these programs, even if they're not 100% accurate. Now let's see what else they've got wrong!\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Alright then, I'll keep it light. So, notice how they're saying that King Henry VII was widely loved by his people from the get go? That's not exactly true. While he eventually won over many, his ascension to the throne wasn't smooth sailing. There was a lot of uncertainty and even hostility at first, especially from Yorkist supporters. They've painted him a bit too much as a white knight here.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Interesting, Finn. I didn't know about the hostility against him. Thanks for sharing. As for their painting him as a white knight, maybe they're just trying to add a little drama to the story, you know, like a stand-up comedy bit where the comedian exaggerates to get laughs. But you're right, it's important to appreciate the complexity of history. Keep it coming, mate!\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Certainly, Noah. Speaking of drama, they also seem to underestimate the significance of Elizabeth of York's marriage to Henry. It was a pretty clever political maneuver that helped assuage Yorkist dissention and ultimately strengthen his rule. Plus, the marriage was by all accounts, surprisingly affectionate, given its political inception. The subtleties they are missing here would indeed add more authenticity and drama to the story.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's fascinating Finn, I didn't realize how pivotal Elizabeth of York's role was. I guess that's the kind of real drama the program is missing! Looks like history can be more intriguing than these shows sometimes portray it. I appreciate your insights, they add another layer of interest to our TV time. Do the folks at the lighthouse appreciate your history knowledge as well?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Don't ruin the enjoyable TV watching experience but also acknowledge the friend's knowledge (Extra information: you are not much interested in history but enjoy the channel's presentation style and don't want the enjoyment to be ruined.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, Noah, I see what you mean. I've noticed a few inaccuracies myself. They're playing a bit fast and loose with the specifics of King Henry VII's reign. I've read quite a lot about it, would you like me to point out the discrepancies?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely Finn, I'm sure you've got a lot of interesting insights to share. Just try to keep it light, you know I enjoy the storytelling aspect of these programs, even if they're not 100% accurate. Now let's see what else they've got wrong!\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Alright then, I'll keep it light. So, notice how they're saying that King Henry VII was widely loved by his people from the get go? That's not exactly true. While he eventually won over many, his ascension to the throne wasn't smooth sailing. There was a lot of uncertainty and even hostility at first, especially from Yorkist supporters. They've painted him a bit too much as a white knight here.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Interesting, Finn. I didn't know about the hostility against him. Thanks for sharing. As for their painting him as a white knight, maybe they're just trying to add a little drama to the story, you know, like a stand-up comedy bit where the comedian exaggerates to get laughs. But you're right, it's important to appreciate the complexity of history. Keep it coming, mate!\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Certainly, Noah. Speaking of drama, they also seem to underestimate the significance of Elizabeth of York's marriage to Henry. It was a pretty clever political maneuver that helped assuage Yorkist dissention and ultimately strengthen his rule. Plus, the marriage was by all accounts, surprisingly affectionate, given its political inception. The subtleties they are missing here would indeed add more authenticity and drama to the story.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"That's fascinating Finn, I didn't realize how pivotal Elizabeth of York's role was. I guess that's the kind of real drama the program is missing! Looks like history can be more intriguing than these shows sometimes portray it. I appreciate your insights, they add another layer of interest to our TV time. Do the folks at the lighthouse appreciate your history knowledge as well?\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"They do, Noah. In fact, I often embark on historical tales while we take turns on watch. It makes time fly by a bit quicker, I suppose. Plus, I've always believed that understanding our past, however complex, gives us a better grasp on our present. And while there's room for dramatic storytelling, it's equally important not to overlook the nuances. I'm glad you find these little nuggets of truthful history interesting.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ha, I think we've got our own special TV commentary going on here! But I totally agree with you, Finn. Understanding our past is a key to understanding our present. Even if the stories aren't always perfectly accurate, they spark our interest which leads us to delve deeper into the realities of the past. So here's to more 'nuggets of truthful history' from you, mate!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Don't ruin the enjoyable TV watching experience but also acknowledge the friend's knowledge (Extra information: you are not much interested in history but enjoy the channel's presentation style and don't want the enjoyment to be ruined.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, Noah, I see what you mean. I've noticed a few inaccuracies myself. They're playing a bit fast and loose with the specifics of King Henry VII's reign. I've read quite a lot about it, would you like me to point out the discrepancies?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely Finn, I'm sure you've got a lot of interesting insights to share. Just try to keep it light, you know I enjoy the storytelling aspect of these programs, even if they're not 100% accurate. Now let's see what else they've got wrong!\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Alright then, I'll keep it light. So, notice how they're saying that King Henry VII was widely loved by his people from the get go? That's not exactly true. While he eventually won over many, his ascension to the throne wasn't smooth sailing. There was a lot of uncertainty and even hostility at first, especially from Yorkist supporters. They've painted him a bit too much as a white knight here.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Interesting, Finn. I didn't know about the hostility against him. Thanks for sharing. As for their painting him as a white knight, maybe they're just trying to add a little drama to the story, you know, like a stand-up comedy bit where the comedian exaggerates to get laughs. But you're right, it's important to appreciate the complexity of history. Keep it coming, mate!\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Certainly, Noah. Speaking of drama, they also seem to underestimate the significance of Elizabeth of York's marriage to Henry. It was a pretty clever political maneuver that helped assuage Yorkist dissention and ultimately strengthen his rule. Plus, the marriage was by all accounts, surprisingly affectionate, given its political inception. The subtleties they are missing here would indeed add more authenticity and drama to the story.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"That's fascinating Finn, I didn't realize how pivotal Elizabeth of York's role was. I guess that's the kind of real drama the program is missing! Looks like history can be more intriguing than these shows sometimes portray it. I appreciate your insights, they add another layer of interest to our TV time. Do the folks at the lighthouse appreciate your history knowledge as well?\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"They do, Noah. In fact, I often embark on historical tales while we take turns on watch. It makes time fly by a bit quicker, I suppose. Plus, I've always believed that understanding our past, however complex, gives us a better grasp on our present. And while there's room for dramatic storytelling, it's equally important not to overlook the nuances. I'm glad you find these little nuggets of truthful history interesting.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Ha, I think we've got our own special TV commentary going on here! But I totally agree with you, Finn. Understanding our past is a key to understanding our present. Even if the stories aren't always perfectly accurate, they spark our interest which leads us to delve deeper into the realities of the past. So here's to more 'nuggets of truthful history' from you, mate!\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Indeed Noah, we're running our own history correction segment right here! I'm glad you find it interesting. Makes me think, perhaps I should take to painting some of these historical scenes with all their true complexities. It could be a good way to depict the visceral reality of the past. Here's to striving for accurate storytelling, both on canvas and in conversation!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I think you're on to something, Finn! Your paintings already have such depth and detail, just imagine translating these historical nuances onto canvas. Would love to see that! And yes, here's to accurate storytelling, my friend!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Don't ruin the enjoyable TV watching experience but also acknowledge the friend's knowledge (Extra information: you are not much interested in history but enjoy the channel's presentation style and don't want the enjoyment to be ruined.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, Noah, I see what you mean. I've noticed a few inaccuracies myself. They're playing a bit fast and loose with the specifics of King Henry VII's reign. I've read quite a lot about it, would you like me to point out the discrepancies?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely Finn, I'm sure you've got a lot of interesting insights to share. Just try to keep it light, you know I enjoy the storytelling aspect of these programs, even if they're not 100% accurate. Now let's see what else they've got wrong!\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Alright then, I'll keep it light. So, notice how they're saying that King Henry VII was widely loved by his people from the get go? That's not exactly true. While he eventually won over many, his ascension to the throne wasn't smooth sailing. There was a lot of uncertainty and even hostility at first, especially from Yorkist supporters. They've painted him a bit too much as a white knight here.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Interesting, Finn. I didn't know about the hostility against him. Thanks for sharing. As for their painting him as a white knight, maybe they're just trying to add a little drama to the story, you know, like a stand-up comedy bit where the comedian exaggerates to get laughs. But you're right, it's important to appreciate the complexity of history. Keep it coming, mate!\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Certainly, Noah. Speaking of drama, they also seem to underestimate the significance of Elizabeth of York's marriage to Henry. It was a pretty clever political maneuver that helped assuage Yorkist dissention and ultimately strengthen his rule. Plus, the marriage was by all accounts, surprisingly affectionate, given its political inception. The subtleties they are missing here would indeed add more authenticity and drama to the story.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"That's fascinating Finn, I didn't realize how pivotal Elizabeth of York's role was. I guess that's the kind of real drama the program is missing! Looks like history can be more intriguing than these shows sometimes portray it. I appreciate your insights, they add another layer of interest to our TV time. Do the folks at the lighthouse appreciate your history knowledge as well?\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"They do, Noah. In fact, I often embark on historical tales while we take turns on watch. It makes time fly by a bit quicker, I suppose. Plus, I've always believed that understanding our past, however complex, gives us a better grasp on our present. And while there's room for dramatic storytelling, it's equally important not to overlook the nuances. I'm glad you find these little nuggets of truthful history interesting.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Ha, I think we've got our own special TV commentary going on here! But I totally agree with you, Finn. Understanding our past is a key to understanding our present. Even if the stories aren't always perfectly accurate, they spark our interest which leads us to delve deeper into the realities of the past. So here's to more 'nuggets of truthful history' from you, mate!\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Indeed Noah, we're running our own history correction segment right here! I'm glad you find it interesting. Makes me think, perhaps I should take to painting some of these historical scenes with all their true complexities. It could be a good way to depict the visceral reality of the past. Here's to striving for accurate storytelling, both on canvas and in conversation!\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"I think you're on to something, Finn! Your paintings already have such depth and detail, just imagine translating these historical nuances onto canvas. Would love to see that! And yes, here's to accurate storytelling, my friend!\"\n\nTurn #10: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I'm delighted you're interested in this, Noah! I'll do my best to delicately infuse history into my artwork. Maybe it could even serve as a visual commentary to accompany these programs. Let's keep this tradition going, my friend, and continue to delve into the fascinating reality of the past! Who knows what misconceptions we might uncover next?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Finn! Let's keep this tradition going. And who knows, maybe one day you can give a history lesson of your own on one of these programs. They could certainly use your knowledge and nuanced understanding. Now, on to the next historical drama!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Don't ruin the enjoyable TV watching experience but also acknowledge the friend's knowledge (Extra information: you are not much interested in history but enjoy the channel's presentation style and don't want the enjoyment to be ruined.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, Noah, I see what you mean. I've noticed a few inaccuracies myself. They're playing a bit fast and loose with the specifics of King Henry VII's reign. I've read quite a lot about it, would you like me to point out the discrepancies?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely Finn, I'm sure you've got a lot of interesting insights to share. Just try to keep it light, you know I enjoy the storytelling aspect of these programs, even if they're not 100% accurate. Now let's see what else they've got wrong!\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Alright then, I'll keep it light. So, notice how they're saying that King Henry VII was widely loved by his people from the get go? That's not exactly true. While he eventually won over many, his ascension to the throne wasn't smooth sailing. There was a lot of uncertainty and even hostility at first, especially from Yorkist supporters. They've painted him a bit too much as a white knight here.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Interesting, Finn. I didn't know about the hostility against him. Thanks for sharing. As for their painting him as a white knight, maybe they're just trying to add a little drama to the story, you know, like a stand-up comedy bit where the comedian exaggerates to get laughs. But you're right, it's important to appreciate the complexity of history. Keep it coming, mate!\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Certainly, Noah. Speaking of drama, they also seem to underestimate the significance of Elizabeth of York's marriage to Henry. It was a pretty clever political maneuver that helped assuage Yorkist dissention and ultimately strengthen his rule. Plus, the marriage was by all accounts, surprisingly affectionate, given its political inception. The subtleties they are missing here would indeed add more authenticity and drama to the story.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"That's fascinating Finn, I didn't realize how pivotal Elizabeth of York's role was. I guess that's the kind of real drama the program is missing! Looks like history can be more intriguing than these shows sometimes portray it. I appreciate your insights, they add another layer of interest to our TV time. Do the folks at the lighthouse appreciate your history knowledge as well?\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"They do, Noah. In fact, I often embark on historical tales while we take turns on watch. It makes time fly by a bit quicker, I suppose. Plus, I've always believed that understanding our past, however complex, gives us a better grasp on our present. And while there's room for dramatic storytelling, it's equally important not to overlook the nuances. I'm glad you find these little nuggets of truthful history interesting.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Ha, I think we've got our own special TV commentary going on here! But I totally agree with you, Finn. Understanding our past is a key to understanding our present. Even if the stories aren't always perfectly accurate, they spark our interest which leads us to delve deeper into the realities of the past. So here's to more 'nuggets of truthful history' from you, mate!\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Indeed Noah, we're running our own history correction segment right here! I'm glad you find it interesting. Makes me think, perhaps I should take to painting some of these historical scenes with all their true complexities. It could be a good way to depict the visceral reality of the past. Here's to striving for accurate storytelling, both on canvas and in conversation!\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"I think you're on to something, Finn! Your paintings already have such depth and detail, just imagine translating these historical nuances onto canvas. Would love to see that! And yes, here's to accurate storytelling, my friend!\"\n\nTurn #10: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I'm delighted you're interested in this, Noah! I'll do my best to delicately infuse history into my artwork. Maybe it could even serve as a visual commentary to accompany these programs. Let's keep this tradition going, my friend, and continue to delve into the fascinating reality of the past! Who knows what misconceptions we might uncover next?\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Finn! Let's keep this tradition going. And who knows, maybe one day you can give a history lesson of your own on one of these programs. They could certainly use your knowledge and nuanced understanding. Now, on to the next historical drama!\"\n\nTurn #12: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"That would be quite something, wouldn't it? I'm sure there'd be plenty to correct! But for now, let's focus on the history unfolding in front of us. Let's see what else they've got wrong.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed Finn, let's see. Besides, I really enjoy our special commentary. Even more so than the program itself!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Don't ruin the enjoyable TV watching experience but also acknowledge the friend's knowledge (Extra information: you are not much interested in history but enjoy the channel's presentation style and don't want the enjoyment to be ruined.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, Noah, I see what you mean. I've noticed a few inaccuracies myself. They're playing a bit fast and loose with the specifics of King Henry VII's reign. I've read quite a lot about it, would you like me to point out the discrepancies?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely Finn, I'm sure you've got a lot of interesting insights to share. Just try to keep it light, you know I enjoy the storytelling aspect of these programs, even if they're not 100% accurate. Now let's see what else they've got wrong!\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Alright then, I'll keep it light. So, notice how they're saying that King Henry VII was widely loved by his people from the get go? That's not exactly true. While he eventually won over many, his ascension to the throne wasn't smooth sailing. There was a lot of uncertainty and even hostility at first, especially from Yorkist supporters. They've painted him a bit too much as a white knight here.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Interesting, Finn. I didn't know about the hostility against him. Thanks for sharing. As for their painting him as a white knight, maybe they're just trying to add a little drama to the story, you know, like a stand-up comedy bit where the comedian exaggerates to get laughs. But you're right, it's important to appreciate the complexity of history. Keep it coming, mate!\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Certainly, Noah. Speaking of drama, they also seem to underestimate the significance of Elizabeth of York's marriage to Henry. It was a pretty clever political maneuver that helped assuage Yorkist dissention and ultimately strengthen his rule. Plus, the marriage was by all accounts, surprisingly affectionate, given its political inception. The subtleties they are missing here would indeed add more authenticity and drama to the story.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"That's fascinating Finn, I didn't realize how pivotal Elizabeth of York's role was. I guess that's the kind of real drama the program is missing! Looks like history can be more intriguing than these shows sometimes portray it. I appreciate your insights, they add another layer of interest to our TV time. Do the folks at the lighthouse appreciate your history knowledge as well?\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"They do, Noah. In fact, I often embark on historical tales while we take turns on watch. It makes time fly by a bit quicker, I suppose. Plus, I've always believed that understanding our past, however complex, gives us a better grasp on our present. And while there's room for dramatic storytelling, it's equally important not to overlook the nuances. I'm glad you find these little nuggets of truthful history interesting.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Ha, I think we've got our own special TV commentary going on here! But I totally agree with you, Finn. Understanding our past is a key to understanding our present. Even if the stories aren't always perfectly accurate, they spark our interest which leads us to delve deeper into the realities of the past. So here's to more 'nuggets of truthful history' from you, mate!\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Indeed Noah, we're running our own history correction segment right here! I'm glad you find it interesting. Makes me think, perhaps I should take to painting some of these historical scenes with all their true complexities. It could be a good way to depict the visceral reality of the past. Here's to striving for accurate storytelling, both on canvas and in conversation!\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"I think you're on to something, Finn! Your paintings already have such depth and detail, just imagine translating these historical nuances onto canvas. Would love to see that! And yes, here's to accurate storytelling, my friend!\"\n\nTurn #10: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I'm delighted you're interested in this, Noah! I'll do my best to delicately infuse history into my artwork. Maybe it could even serve as a visual commentary to accompany these programs. Let's keep this tradition going, my friend, and continue to delve into the fascinating reality of the past! Who knows what misconceptions we might uncover next?\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Finn! Let's keep this tradition going. And who knows, maybe one day you can give a history lesson of your own on one of these programs. They could certainly use your knowledge and nuanced understanding. Now, on to the next historical drama!\"\n\nTurn #12: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"That would be quite something, wouldn't it? I'm sure there'd be plenty to correct! But for now, let's focus on the history unfolding in front of us. Let's see what else they've got wrong.\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed Finn, let's see. Besides, I really enjoy our special commentary. Even more so than the program itself!\"\n\nTurn #14: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I'm glad you're enjoying our 'reality checks', Noah. It certainly adds a different layer of excitement to our viewing. Let's keep our minds nimble and sharp, ready to sift through the dramatizations and spot the historical truths. Onwards to the next drama and our fun 'fact-check' exercise!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Couldn't agree more, Finn! Our 'fact-check' exercise does add an exciting layer to our viewing. Let's strap in and see what other historical truths we can unearth. On to the next drama!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Don't ruin the enjoyable TV watching experience but also acknowledge the friend's knowledge (Extra information: you are not much interested in history but enjoy the channel's presentation style and don't want the enjoyment to be ruined.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, Noah, I see what you mean. I've noticed a few inaccuracies myself. They're playing a bit fast and loose with the specifics of King Henry VII's reign. I've read quite a lot about it, would you like me to point out the discrepancies?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely Finn, I'm sure you've got a lot of interesting insights to share. Just try to keep it light, you know I enjoy the storytelling aspect of these programs, even if they're not 100% accurate. Now let's see what else they've got wrong!\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Alright then, I'll keep it light. So, notice how they're saying that King Henry VII was widely loved by his people from the get go? That's not exactly true. While he eventually won over many, his ascension to the throne wasn't smooth sailing. There was a lot of uncertainty and even hostility at first, especially from Yorkist supporters. They've painted him a bit too much as a white knight here.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Interesting, Finn. I didn't know about the hostility against him. Thanks for sharing. As for their painting him as a white knight, maybe they're just trying to add a little drama to the story, you know, like a stand-up comedy bit where the comedian exaggerates to get laughs. But you're right, it's important to appreciate the complexity of history. Keep it coming, mate!\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Certainly, Noah. Speaking of drama, they also seem to underestimate the significance of Elizabeth of York's marriage to Henry. It was a pretty clever political maneuver that helped assuage Yorkist dissention and ultimately strengthen his rule. Plus, the marriage was by all accounts, surprisingly affectionate, given its political inception. The subtleties they are missing here would indeed add more authenticity and drama to the story.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"That's fascinating Finn, I didn't realize how pivotal Elizabeth of York's role was. I guess that's the kind of real drama the program is missing! Looks like history can be more intriguing than these shows sometimes portray it. I appreciate your insights, they add another layer of interest to our TV time. Do the folks at the lighthouse appreciate your history knowledge as well?\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"They do, Noah. In fact, I often embark on historical tales while we take turns on watch. It makes time fly by a bit quicker, I suppose. Plus, I've always believed that understanding our past, however complex, gives us a better grasp on our present. And while there's room for dramatic storytelling, it's equally important not to overlook the nuances. I'm glad you find these little nuggets of truthful history interesting.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Ha, I think we've got our own special TV commentary going on here! But I totally agree with you, Finn. Understanding our past is a key to understanding our present. Even if the stories aren't always perfectly accurate, they spark our interest which leads us to delve deeper into the realities of the past. So here's to more 'nuggets of truthful history' from you, mate!\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Indeed Noah, we're running our own history correction segment right here! I'm glad you find it interesting. Makes me think, perhaps I should take to painting some of these historical scenes with all their true complexities. It could be a good way to depict the visceral reality of the past. Here's to striving for accurate storytelling, both on canvas and in conversation!\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"I think you're on to something, Finn! Your paintings already have such depth and detail, just imagine translating these historical nuances onto canvas. Would love to see that! And yes, here's to accurate storytelling, my friend!\"\n\nTurn #10: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I'm delighted you're interested in this, Noah! I'll do my best to delicately infuse history into my artwork. Maybe it could even serve as a visual commentary to accompany these programs. Let's keep this tradition going, my friend, and continue to delve into the fascinating reality of the past! Who knows what misconceptions we might uncover next?\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Finn! Let's keep this tradition going. And who knows, maybe one day you can give a history lesson of your own on one of these programs. They could certainly use your knowledge and nuanced understanding. Now, on to the next historical drama!\"\n\nTurn #12: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"That would be quite something, wouldn't it? I'm sure there'd be plenty to correct! But for now, let's focus on the history unfolding in front of us. Let's see what else they've got wrong.\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed Finn, let's see. Besides, I really enjoy our special commentary. Even more so than the program itself!\"\n\nTurn #14: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I'm glad you're enjoying our 'reality checks', Noah. It certainly adds a different layer of excitement to our viewing. Let's keep our minds nimble and sharp, ready to sift through the dramatizations and spot the historical truths. Onwards to the next drama and our fun 'fact-check' exercise!\"\n\nTurn #15: Noah Davis said: \"Couldn't agree more, Finn! Our 'fact-check' exercise does add an exciting layer to our viewing. Let's strap in and see what other historical truths we can unearth. On to the next drama!\"\n\nTurn #16: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Indeed, Noah! I'm excited for the next one. Armed with a little patience and a keen eye for details, we might just uncover more historical facts hidden amongst the dramatization. Time to dig deeper into history, my friend!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, Finn! The program's playing now, what do you expect from it? Let's see what's right or wrong this time!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Don't ruin the enjoyable TV watching experience but also acknowledge the friend's knowledge (Extra information: you are not much interested in history but enjoy the channel's presentation style and don't want the enjoyment to be ruined.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, Noah, I see what you mean. I've noticed a few inaccuracies myself. They're playing a bit fast and loose with the specifics of King Henry VII's reign. I've read quite a lot about it, would you like me to point out the discrepancies?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely Finn, I'm sure you've got a lot of interesting insights to share. Just try to keep it light, you know I enjoy the storytelling aspect of these programs, even if they're not 100% accurate. Now let's see what else they've got wrong!\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Alright then, I'll keep it light. So, notice how they're saying that King Henry VII was widely loved by his people from the get go? That's not exactly true. While he eventually won over many, his ascension to the throne wasn't smooth sailing. There was a lot of uncertainty and even hostility at first, especially from Yorkist supporters. They've painted him a bit too much as a white knight here.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Interesting, Finn. I didn't know about the hostility against him. Thanks for sharing. As for their painting him as a white knight, maybe they're just trying to add a little drama to the story, you know, like a stand-up comedy bit where the comedian exaggerates to get laughs. But you're right, it's important to appreciate the complexity of history. Keep it coming, mate!\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Certainly, Noah. Speaking of drama, they also seem to underestimate the significance of Elizabeth of York's marriage to Henry. It was a pretty clever political maneuver that helped assuage Yorkist dissention and ultimately strengthen his rule. Plus, the marriage was by all accounts, surprisingly affectionate, given its political inception. The subtleties they are missing here would indeed add more authenticity and drama to the story.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"That's fascinating Finn, I didn't realize how pivotal Elizabeth of York's role was. I guess that's the kind of real drama the program is missing! Looks like history can be more intriguing than these shows sometimes portray it. I appreciate your insights, they add another layer of interest to our TV time. Do the folks at the lighthouse appreciate your history knowledge as well?\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"They do, Noah. In fact, I often embark on historical tales while we take turns on watch. It makes time fly by a bit quicker, I suppose. Plus, I've always believed that understanding our past, however complex, gives us a better grasp on our present. And while there's room for dramatic storytelling, it's equally important not to overlook the nuances. I'm glad you find these little nuggets of truthful history interesting.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Ha, I think we've got our own special TV commentary going on here! But I totally agree with you, Finn. Understanding our past is a key to understanding our present. Even if the stories aren't always perfectly accurate, they spark our interest which leads us to delve deeper into the realities of the past. So here's to more 'nuggets of truthful history' from you, mate!\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Indeed Noah, we're running our own history correction segment right here! I'm glad you find it interesting. Makes me think, perhaps I should take to painting some of these historical scenes with all their true complexities. It could be a good way to depict the visceral reality of the past. Here's to striving for accurate storytelling, both on canvas and in conversation!\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"I think you're on to something, Finn! Your paintings already have such depth and detail, just imagine translating these historical nuances onto canvas. Would love to see that! And yes, here's to accurate storytelling, my friend!\"\n\nTurn #10: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I'm delighted you're interested in this, Noah! I'll do my best to delicately infuse history into my artwork. Maybe it could even serve as a visual commentary to accompany these programs. Let's keep this tradition going, my friend, and continue to delve into the fascinating reality of the past! Who knows what misconceptions we might uncover next?\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Finn! Let's keep this tradition going. And who knows, maybe one day you can give a history lesson of your own on one of these programs. They could certainly use your knowledge and nuanced understanding. Now, on to the next historical drama!\"\n\nTurn #12: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"That would be quite something, wouldn't it? I'm sure there'd be plenty to correct! But for now, let's focus on the history unfolding in front of us. Let's see what else they've got wrong.\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed Finn, let's see. Besides, I really enjoy our special commentary. Even more so than the program itself!\"\n\nTurn #14: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I'm glad you're enjoying our 'reality checks', Noah. It certainly adds a different layer of excitement to our viewing. Let's keep our minds nimble and sharp, ready to sift through the dramatizations and spot the historical truths. Onwards to the next drama and our fun 'fact-check' exercise!\"\n\nTurn #15: Noah Davis said: \"Couldn't agree more, Finn! Our 'fact-check' exercise does add an exciting layer to our viewing. Let's strap in and see what other historical truths we can unearth. On to the next drama!\"\n\nTurn #16: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Indeed, Noah! I'm excited for the next one. Armed with a little patience and a keen eye for details, we might just uncover more historical facts hidden amongst the dramatization. Time to dig deeper into history, my friend!\"\n\nTurn #17: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, Finn! The program's playing now, what do you expect from it? Let's see what's right or wrong this time!\"\n\nTurn #18: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Let's dive into this episode, shall we? I'm curious to see their interpretation of the Spanish Armada. Off they go claiming that it was purely a religious war. That's a common misconception. While religion indeed played a part, so did political and commercial tensions. Let's keep our eyes peeled for more details they may overlook.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #19. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're right, Finn. I never looked at it that way. It's interesting how history isn't as one-sided as these shows portray, isn't it? I'm really enjoying your insights, sure puts a new spin on things. Let's uncover more such details together! Now, show me the Spanish Armada through your eyes!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends who have known each other for a long time. One of them used to make fun of the other because English was not their first language.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Apologize sincerely to your friend (Extra information: you used to make fun of your friend's English skills as they were learning the language. Now you regret your actions and want to apologize)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey, Miles. I've been needing to talk to you about something. It's about those times when I used to make fun of your English skills. I realize now how wrong that was, and I'm really sorry. I hope you can forgive me.\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, first of all, I appreciate your courage to realize your mistake and apologize. It's important to understand though, that those jokes weren't harmless. They could sometimes hit a nerve, making me feel insecure and doubting my capabilities. It was hurtful. But, seeing your regret and sincerity today, I'm willing to let it go and we can work towards building a better understanding. Let's just remember in future that words do matter.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Miles, I completely understand what you're saying and I'm truly sorry for making light of a situation that was difficult for you. I've learned that my words can have a much greater impact than I intended and I promise I'll be more careful about that in the future. Let's do make it a point to not repeat such scenarios. It's important for our friendship.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends who have known each other for a long time. One of them used to make fun of the other because English was not their first language.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Apologize sincerely to your friend (Extra information: you used to make fun of your friend's English skills as they were learning the language. Now you regret your actions and want to apologize)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey, Miles. I've been needing to talk to you about something. It's about those times when I used to make fun of your English skills. I realize now how wrong that was, and I'm really sorry. I hope you can forgive me.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends who have known each other for a long time. One of them used to make fun of the other because English was not their first language.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Apologize sincerely to your friend (Extra information: you used to make fun of your friend's English skills as they were learning the language. Now you regret your actions and want to apologize)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey, Miles. I've been needing to talk to you about something. It's about those times when I used to make fun of your English skills. I realize now how wrong that was, and I'm really sorry. I hope you can forgive me.\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, first of all, I appreciate your courage to realize your mistake and apologize. It's important to understand though, that those jokes weren't harmless. They could sometimes hit a nerve, making me feel insecure and doubting my capabilities. It was hurtful. But, seeing your regret and sincerity today, I'm willing to let it go and we can work towards building a better understanding. Let's just remember in future that words do matter.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Miles, I completely understand what you're saying and I'm truly sorry for making light of a situation that was difficult for you. I've learned that my words can have a much greater impact than I intended and I promise I'll be more careful about that in the future. Let's do make it a point to not repeat such scenarios. It's important for our friendship.\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Thank you, Sophia. I appreciate your understanding and promise. I believe that it's this self-realization and the ability to change that makes our bond stronger. Let's keep this open communication as a part of our friendship always. We all make mistakes, what matters is what we learn and how we grow from them.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, Miles. I believe our friendship has the strength to get past this, and your willingness to forgive just proves that. It's the lessons we learn from our past that shape us into better people. Here's to a stronger bond and more open communication between us. Thanks for understanding and giving me a chance to make things right.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends who have known each other for a long time. One of them used to make fun of the other because English was not their first language.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Apologize sincerely to your friend (Extra information: you used to make fun of your friend's English skills as they were learning the language. Now you regret your actions and want to apologize)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey, Miles. I've been needing to talk to you about something. It's about those times when I used to make fun of your English skills. I realize now how wrong that was, and I'm really sorry. I hope you can forgive me.\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, first of all, I appreciate your courage to realize your mistake and apologize. It's important to understand though, that those jokes weren't harmless. They could sometimes hit a nerve, making me feel insecure and doubting my capabilities. It was hurtful. But, seeing your regret and sincerity today, I'm willing to let it go and we can work towards building a better understanding. Let's just remember in future that words do matter.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Miles, I completely understand what you're saying and I'm truly sorry for making light of a situation that was difficult for you. I've learned that my words can have a much greater impact than I intended and I promise I'll be more careful about that in the future. Let's do make it a point to not repeat such scenarios. It's important for our friendship.\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Thank you, Sophia. I appreciate your understanding and promise. I believe that it's this self-realization and the ability to change that makes our bond stronger. Let's keep this open communication as a part of our friendship always. We all make mistakes, what matters is what we learn and how we grow from them.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Indeed, Miles. I believe our friendship has the strength to get past this, and your willingness to forgive just proves that. It's the lessons we learn from our past that shape us into better people. Here's to a stronger bond and more open communication between us. Thanks for understanding and giving me a chance to make things right.\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"You're welcome, Sophia. Here's to more respect, understanding, and growth in our friendship. As a friend, your apology does mean a lot to me. Let's consider this a new chapter of our relationship and put all sour memories behind us. Thank you again for acknowledging and realizing your mistake. Can we put this behind us and focus on catching up? How's your training going on?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you Miles, I appreciate your empathy on this. Sure, let's focus on catching up now. I have this incredible ridge in the national park to climb next week. And by the way, I heard you spent some time tending to your garden. How's that coming along?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends who have known each other for a long time. One of them used to make fun of the other because English was not their first language.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Apologize sincerely to your friend (Extra information: you used to make fun of your friend's English skills as they were learning the language. Now you regret your actions and want to apologize)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey, Miles. I've been needing to talk to you about something. It's about those times when I used to make fun of your English skills. I realize now how wrong that was, and I'm really sorry. I hope you can forgive me.\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, first of all, I appreciate your courage to realize your mistake and apologize. It's important to understand though, that those jokes weren't harmless. They could sometimes hit a nerve, making me feel insecure and doubting my capabilities. It was hurtful. But, seeing your regret and sincerity today, I'm willing to let it go and we can work towards building a better understanding. Let's just remember in future that words do matter.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Miles, I completely understand what you're saying and I'm truly sorry for making light of a situation that was difficult for you. I've learned that my words can have a much greater impact than I intended and I promise I'll be more careful about that in the future. Let's do make it a point to not repeat such scenarios. It's important for our friendship.\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Thank you, Sophia. I appreciate your understanding and promise. I believe that it's this self-realization and the ability to change that makes our bond stronger. Let's keep this open communication as a part of our friendship always. We all make mistakes, what matters is what we learn and how we grow from them.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Indeed, Miles. I believe our friendship has the strength to get past this, and your willingness to forgive just proves that. It's the lessons we learn from our past that shape us into better people. Here's to a stronger bond and more open communication between us. Thanks for understanding and giving me a chance to make things right.\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"You're welcome, Sophia. Here's to more respect, understanding, and growth in our friendship. As a friend, your apology does mean a lot to me. Let's consider this a new chapter of our relationship and put all sour memories behind us. Thank you again for acknowledging and realizing your mistake. Can we put this behind us and focus on catching up? How's your training going on?\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"Thank you Miles, I appreciate your empathy on this. Sure, let's focus on catching up now. I have this incredible ridge in the national park to climb next week. And by the way, I heard you spent some time tending to your garden. How's that coming along?\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"That sounds adventurous, Sophia! I hope you have a safe and enjoyable climb. And yes, my garden is thriving. I've been experimenting with a few new herbs and I'm quite excited about it. Maybe, after your climb, we could cook a meal together using some fresh produce from my garden?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds perfect, Miles! A climb and then getting to eat something from your exquisite garden sounds like a plan. Cooking together using your fresh produce after my climb, that's something to look forward to! And hey, maybe I can pick up tips on your English too!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends who have known each other for a long time. One of them used to make fun of the other because English was not their first language.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Apologize sincerely to your friend (Extra information: you used to make fun of your friend's English skills as they were learning the language. Now you regret your actions and want to apologize)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey, Miles. I've been needing to talk to you about something. It's about those times when I used to make fun of your English skills. I realize now how wrong that was, and I'm really sorry. I hope you can forgive me.\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, first of all, I appreciate your courage to realize your mistake and apologize. It's important to understand though, that those jokes weren't harmless. They could sometimes hit a nerve, making me feel insecure and doubting my capabilities. It was hurtful. But, seeing your regret and sincerity today, I'm willing to let it go and we can work towards building a better understanding. Let's just remember in future that words do matter.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Miles, I completely understand what you're saying and I'm truly sorry for making light of a situation that was difficult for you. I've learned that my words can have a much greater impact than I intended and I promise I'll be more careful about that in the future. Let's do make it a point to not repeat such scenarios. It's important for our friendship.\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Thank you, Sophia. I appreciate your understanding and promise. I believe that it's this self-realization and the ability to change that makes our bond stronger. Let's keep this open communication as a part of our friendship always. We all make mistakes, what matters is what we learn and how we grow from them.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Indeed, Miles. I believe our friendship has the strength to get past this, and your willingness to forgive just proves that. It's the lessons we learn from our past that shape us into better people. Here's to a stronger bond and more open communication between us. Thanks for understanding and giving me a chance to make things right.\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"You're welcome, Sophia. Here's to more respect, understanding, and growth in our friendship. As a friend, your apology does mean a lot to me. Let's consider this a new chapter of our relationship and put all sour memories behind us. Thank you again for acknowledging and realizing your mistake. Can we put this behind us and focus on catching up? How's your training going on?\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"Thank you Miles, I appreciate your empathy on this. Sure, let's focus on catching up now. I have this incredible ridge in the national park to climb next week. And by the way, I heard you spent some time tending to your garden. How's that coming along?\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"That sounds adventurous, Sophia! I hope you have a safe and enjoyable climb. And yes, my garden is thriving. I've been experimenting with a few new herbs and I'm quite excited about it. Maybe, after your climb, we could cook a meal together using some fresh produce from my garden?\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"That sounds perfect, Miles! A climb and then getting to eat something from your exquisite garden sounds like a plan. Cooking together using your fresh produce after my climb, that's something to look forward to! And hey, maybe I can pick up tips on your English too!\"\n\nTurn #9: Miles Hawkins said: \"Actually, Sophia, you're reference to my English there... not cool. But I guess we can laugh it off this time. I'd also be happy to help you with any language tips the next time we cook together. For now, let's just look forward to your climb and our upcoming cooking session!\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"That seems fair, Miles. I apologize if my last joke was in poor taste, I'm still learning and I really appreciate you pointing that out. I'm looking forward to sharing in more positive experiences moving forward and I can't wait for our cooking session. Thanks for being so understanding.\"\n\nTurn #11: Miles Hawkins said: \"It's all right, Sophia. We all stumble and learn, don't we? I'm looking forward to these exciting times ahead of us \u2013 your climb, our cooking session, and of course our ever-evolving friendship. I'm sure we'll make many more beautiful memories together.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Miles! It's those stumbles that make each accomplishment all the more worthwhile. I'm excited about all the adventures we're about to have. Here's to making better memories together!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends who have known each other for a long time. One of them used to make fun of the other because English was not their first language.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Apologize sincerely to your friend (Extra information: you used to make fun of your friend's English skills as they were learning the language. Now you regret your actions and want to apologize)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey, Miles. I've been needing to talk to you about something. It's about those times when I used to make fun of your English skills. I realize now how wrong that was, and I'm really sorry. I hope you can forgive me.\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, first of all, I appreciate your courage to realize your mistake and apologize. It's important to understand though, that those jokes weren't harmless. They could sometimes hit a nerve, making me feel insecure and doubting my capabilities. It was hurtful. But, seeing your regret and sincerity today, I'm willing to let it go and we can work towards building a better understanding. Let's just remember in future that words do matter.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Miles, I completely understand what you're saying and I'm truly sorry for making light of a situation that was difficult for you. I've learned that my words can have a much greater impact than I intended and I promise I'll be more careful about that in the future. Let's do make it a point to not repeat such scenarios. It's important for our friendship.\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Thank you, Sophia. I appreciate your understanding and promise. I believe that it's this self-realization and the ability to change that makes our bond stronger. Let's keep this open communication as a part of our friendship always. We all make mistakes, what matters is what we learn and how we grow from them.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Indeed, Miles. I believe our friendship has the strength to get past this, and your willingness to forgive just proves that. It's the lessons we learn from our past that shape us into better people. Here's to a stronger bond and more open communication between us. Thanks for understanding and giving me a chance to make things right.\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"You're welcome, Sophia. Here's to more respect, understanding, and growth in our friendship. As a friend, your apology does mean a lot to me. Let's consider this a new chapter of our relationship and put all sour memories behind us. Thank you again for acknowledging and realizing your mistake. Can we put this behind us and focus on catching up? How's your training going on?\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"Thank you Miles, I appreciate your empathy on this. Sure, let's focus on catching up now. I have this incredible ridge in the national park to climb next week. And by the way, I heard you spent some time tending to your garden. How's that coming along?\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"That sounds adventurous, Sophia! I hope you have a safe and enjoyable climb. And yes, my garden is thriving. I've been experimenting with a few new herbs and I'm quite excited about it. Maybe, after your climb, we could cook a meal together using some fresh produce from my garden?\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"That sounds perfect, Miles! A climb and then getting to eat something from your exquisite garden sounds like a plan. Cooking together using your fresh produce after my climb, that's something to look forward to! And hey, maybe I can pick up tips on your English too!\"\n\nTurn #9: Miles Hawkins said: \"Actually, Sophia, you're reference to my English there... not cool. But I guess we can laugh it off this time. I'd also be happy to help you with any language tips the next time we cook together. For now, let's just look forward to your climb and our upcoming cooking session!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That seems fair, Miles. I apologize if my last joke was in poor taste, I'm still learning and I really appreciate you pointing that out. I'm looking forward to sharing in more positive experiences moving forward and I can't wait for our cooking session. Thanks for being so understanding.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends who have known each other for a long time. One of them used to make fun of the other because English was not their first language.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Apologize sincerely to your friend (Extra information: you used to make fun of your friend's English skills as they were learning the language. Now you regret your actions and want to apologize)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey, Miles. I've been needing to talk to you about something. It's about those times when I used to make fun of your English skills. I realize now how wrong that was, and I'm really sorry. I hope you can forgive me.\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, first of all, I appreciate your courage to realize your mistake and apologize. It's important to understand though, that those jokes weren't harmless. They could sometimes hit a nerve, making me feel insecure and doubting my capabilities. It was hurtful. But, seeing your regret and sincerity today, I'm willing to let it go and we can work towards building a better understanding. Let's just remember in future that words do matter.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Miles, I completely understand what you're saying and I'm truly sorry for making light of a situation that was difficult for you. I've learned that my words can have a much greater impact than I intended and I promise I'll be more careful about that in the future. Let's do make it a point to not repeat such scenarios. It's important for our friendship.\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Thank you, Sophia. I appreciate your understanding and promise. I believe that it's this self-realization and the ability to change that makes our bond stronger. Let's keep this open communication as a part of our friendship always. We all make mistakes, what matters is what we learn and how we grow from them.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Indeed, Miles. I believe our friendship has the strength to get past this, and your willingness to forgive just proves that. It's the lessons we learn from our past that shape us into better people. Here's to a stronger bond and more open communication between us. Thanks for understanding and giving me a chance to make things right.\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"You're welcome, Sophia. Here's to more respect, understanding, and growth in our friendship. As a friend, your apology does mean a lot to me. Let's consider this a new chapter of our relationship and put all sour memories behind us. Thank you again for acknowledging and realizing your mistake. Can we put this behind us and focus on catching up? How's your training going on?\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"Thank you Miles, I appreciate your empathy on this. Sure, let's focus on catching up now. I have this incredible ridge in the national park to climb next week. And by the way, I heard you spent some time tending to your garden. How's that coming along?\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"That sounds adventurous, Sophia! I hope you have a safe and enjoyable climb. And yes, my garden is thriving. I've been experimenting with a few new herbs and I'm quite excited about it. Maybe, after your climb, we could cook a meal together using some fresh produce from my garden?\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"That sounds perfect, Miles! A climb and then getting to eat something from your exquisite garden sounds like a plan. Cooking together using your fresh produce after my climb, that's something to look forward to! And hey, maybe I can pick up tips on your English too!\"\n\nTurn #9: Miles Hawkins said: \"Actually, Sophia, you're reference to my English there... not cool. But I guess we can laugh it off this time. I'd also be happy to help you with any language tips the next time we cook together. For now, let's just look forward to your climb and our upcoming cooking session!\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"That seems fair, Miles. I apologize if my last joke was in poor taste, I'm still learning and I really appreciate you pointing that out. I'm looking forward to sharing in more positive experiences moving forward and I can't wait for our cooking session. Thanks for being so understanding.\"\n\nTurn #11: Miles Hawkins said: \"It's all right, Sophia. We all stumble and learn, don't we? I'm looking forward to these exciting times ahead of us \u2013 your climb, our cooking session, and of course our ever-evolving friendship. I'm sure we'll make many more beautiful memories together.\"\n\nTurn #12: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles! It's those stumbles that make each accomplishment all the more worthwhile. I'm excited about all the adventures we're about to have. Here's to making better memories together!\"\n\nTurn #13: Miles Hawkins said: \"Indeed, Sophia. Through our stumbles, we learn and grow. I can't wait for all the adventures that await us. Here's to new beginnings and making wonderful memories together. Stay safe on your climb, see you when you're back!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you so much, Miles. I appreciate your understanding and I'll definitely stay safe on my climb. See you soon with new stories to tell and a renewed eagerness to learn.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends who have known each other for a long time. One of them used to make fun of the other because English was not their first language.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Apologize sincerely to your friend (Extra information: you used to make fun of your friend's English skills as they were learning the language. Now you regret your actions and want to apologize)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey, Miles. I've been needing to talk to you about something. It's about those times when I used to make fun of your English skills. I realize now how wrong that was, and I'm really sorry. I hope you can forgive me.\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, first of all, I appreciate your courage to realize your mistake and apologize. It's important to understand though, that those jokes weren't harmless. They could sometimes hit a nerve, making me feel insecure and doubting my capabilities. It was hurtful. But, seeing your regret and sincerity today, I'm willing to let it go and we can work towards building a better understanding. Let's just remember in future that words do matter.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Miles, I completely understand what you're saying and I'm truly sorry for making light of a situation that was difficult for you. I've learned that my words can have a much greater impact than I intended and I promise I'll be more careful about that in the future. Let's do make it a point to not repeat such scenarios. It's important for our friendship.\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Thank you, Sophia. I appreciate your understanding and promise. I believe that it's this self-realization and the ability to change that makes our bond stronger. Let's keep this open communication as a part of our friendship always. We all make mistakes, what matters is what we learn and how we grow from them.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Indeed, Miles. I believe our friendship has the strength to get past this, and your willingness to forgive just proves that. It's the lessons we learn from our past that shape us into better people. Here's to a stronger bond and more open communication between us. Thanks for understanding and giving me a chance to make things right.\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"You're welcome, Sophia. Here's to more respect, understanding, and growth in our friendship. As a friend, your apology does mean a lot to me. Let's consider this a new chapter of our relationship and put all sour memories behind us. Thank you again for acknowledging and realizing your mistake. Can we put this behind us and focus on catching up? How's your training going on?\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"Thank you Miles, I appreciate your empathy on this. Sure, let's focus on catching up now. I have this incredible ridge in the national park to climb next week. And by the way, I heard you spent some time tending to your garden. How's that coming along?\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"That sounds adventurous, Sophia! I hope you have a safe and enjoyable climb. And yes, my garden is thriving. I've been experimenting with a few new herbs and I'm quite excited about it. Maybe, after your climb, we could cook a meal together using some fresh produce from my garden?\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"That sounds perfect, Miles! A climb and then getting to eat something from your exquisite garden sounds like a plan. Cooking together using your fresh produce after my climb, that's something to look forward to! And hey, maybe I can pick up tips on your English too!\"\n\nTurn #9: Miles Hawkins said: \"Actually, Sophia, you're reference to my English there... not cool. But I guess we can laugh it off this time. I'd also be happy to help you with any language tips the next time we cook together. For now, let's just look forward to your climb and our upcoming cooking session!\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"That seems fair, Miles. I apologize if my last joke was in poor taste, I'm still learning and I really appreciate you pointing that out. I'm looking forward to sharing in more positive experiences moving forward and I can't wait for our cooking session. Thanks for being so understanding.\"\n\nTurn #11: Miles Hawkins said: \"It's all right, Sophia. We all stumble and learn, don't we? I'm looking forward to these exciting times ahead of us \u2013 your climb, our cooking session, and of course our ever-evolving friendship. I'm sure we'll make many more beautiful memories together.\"\n\nTurn #12: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles! It's those stumbles that make each accomplishment all the more worthwhile. I'm excited about all the adventures we're about to have. Here's to making better memories together!\"\n\nTurn #13: Miles Hawkins said: \"Indeed, Sophia. Through our stumbles, we learn and grow. I can't wait for all the adventures that await us. Here's to new beginnings and making wonderful memories together. Stay safe on your climb, see you when you're back!\"\n\nTurn #14: Sophia James said: \"Thank you so much, Miles. I appreciate your understanding and I'll definitely stay safe on my climb. See you soon with new stories to tell and a renewed eagerness to learn.\"\n\nTurn #15: Miles Hawkins said: \"Thank you, Sophia. Looking forward to hearing about your adventures and cooking together. Take care and see you soon!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends who have known each other for a long time. One of them used to make fun of the other because English was not their first language.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Accept the apology but express the hurt caused by the actions (Extra information: you were hurt by your friend's actions and it affected your confidence)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey, Miles. I've been needing to talk to you about something. It's about those times when I used to make fun of your English skills. I realize now how wrong that was, and I'm really sorry. I hope you can forgive me.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sophia, first of all, I appreciate your courage to realize your mistake and apologize. It's important to understand though, that those jokes weren't harmless. They could sometimes hit a nerve, making me feel insecure and doubting my capabilities. It was hurtful. But, seeing your regret and sincerity today, I'm willing to let it go and we can work towards building a better understanding. Let's just remember in future that words do matter.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends who have known each other for a long time. One of them used to make fun of the other because English was not their first language.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Accept the apology but express the hurt caused by the actions (Extra information: you were hurt by your friend's actions and it affected your confidence)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey, Miles. I've been needing to talk to you about something. It's about those times when I used to make fun of your English skills. I realize now how wrong that was, and I'm really sorry. I hope you can forgive me.\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, first of all, I appreciate your courage to realize your mistake and apologize. It's important to understand though, that those jokes weren't harmless. They could sometimes hit a nerve, making me feel insecure and doubting my capabilities. It was hurtful. But, seeing your regret and sincerity today, I'm willing to let it go and we can work towards building a better understanding. Let's just remember in future that words do matter.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Miles, I completely understand what you're saying and I'm truly sorry for making light of a situation that was difficult for you. I've learned that my words can have a much greater impact than I intended and I promise I'll be more careful about that in the future. Let's do make it a point to not repeat such scenarios. It's important for our friendship.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Sophia. I appreciate your understanding and promise. I believe that it's this self-realization and the ability to change that makes our bond stronger. Let's keep this open communication as a part of our friendship always. We all make mistakes, what matters is what we learn and how we grow from them.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends who have known each other for a long time. One of them used to make fun of the other because English was not their first language.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Accept the apology but express the hurt caused by the actions (Extra information: you were hurt by your friend's actions and it affected your confidence)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey, Miles. I've been needing to talk to you about something. It's about those times when I used to make fun of your English skills. I realize now how wrong that was, and I'm really sorry. I hope you can forgive me.\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, first of all, I appreciate your courage to realize your mistake and apologize. It's important to understand though, that those jokes weren't harmless. They could sometimes hit a nerve, making me feel insecure and doubting my capabilities. It was hurtful. But, seeing your regret and sincerity today, I'm willing to let it go and we can work towards building a better understanding. Let's just remember in future that words do matter.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Miles, I completely understand what you're saying and I'm truly sorry for making light of a situation that was difficult for you. I've learned that my words can have a much greater impact than I intended and I promise I'll be more careful about that in the future. Let's do make it a point to not repeat such scenarios. It's important for our friendship.\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Thank you, Sophia. I appreciate your understanding and promise. I believe that it's this self-realization and the ability to change that makes our bond stronger. Let's keep this open communication as a part of our friendship always. We all make mistakes, what matters is what we learn and how we grow from them.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Indeed, Miles. I believe our friendship has the strength to get past this, and your willingness to forgive just proves that. It's the lessons we learn from our past that shape us into better people. Here's to a stronger bond and more open communication between us. Thanks for understanding and giving me a chance to make things right.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're welcome, Sophia. Here's to more respect, understanding, and growth in our friendship. As a friend, your apology does mean a lot to me. Let's consider this a new chapter of our relationship and put all sour memories behind us. Thank you again for acknowledging and realizing your mistake. Can we put this behind us and focus on catching up? How's your training going on?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends who have known each other for a long time. One of them used to make fun of the other because English was not their first language.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Accept the apology but express the hurt caused by the actions (Extra information: you were hurt by your friend's actions and it affected your confidence)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey, Miles. I've been needing to talk to you about something. It's about those times when I used to make fun of your English skills. I realize now how wrong that was, and I'm really sorry. I hope you can forgive me.\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, first of all, I appreciate your courage to realize your mistake and apologize. It's important to understand though, that those jokes weren't harmless. They could sometimes hit a nerve, making me feel insecure and doubting my capabilities. It was hurtful. But, seeing your regret and sincerity today, I'm willing to let it go and we can work towards building a better understanding. Let's just remember in future that words do matter.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Miles, I completely understand what you're saying and I'm truly sorry for making light of a situation that was difficult for you. I've learned that my words can have a much greater impact than I intended and I promise I'll be more careful about that in the future. Let's do make it a point to not repeat such scenarios. It's important for our friendship.\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Thank you, Sophia. I appreciate your understanding and promise. I believe that it's this self-realization and the ability to change that makes our bond stronger. Let's keep this open communication as a part of our friendship always. We all make mistakes, what matters is what we learn and how we grow from them.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Indeed, Miles. I believe our friendship has the strength to get past this, and your willingness to forgive just proves that. It's the lessons we learn from our past that shape us into better people. Here's to a stronger bond and more open communication between us. Thanks for understanding and giving me a chance to make things right.\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"You're welcome, Sophia. Here's to more respect, understanding, and growth in our friendship. As a friend, your apology does mean a lot to me. Let's consider this a new chapter of our relationship and put all sour memories behind us. Thank you again for acknowledging and realizing your mistake. Can we put this behind us and focus on catching up? How's your training going on?\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"Thank you Miles, I appreciate your empathy on this. Sure, let's focus on catching up now. I have this incredible ridge in the national park to climb next week. And by the way, I heard you spent some time tending to your garden. How's that coming along?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds adventurous, Sophia! I hope you have a safe and enjoyable climb. And yes, my garden is thriving. I've been experimenting with a few new herbs and I'm quite excited about it. Maybe, after your climb, we could cook a meal together using some fresh produce from my garden?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends who have known each other for a long time. One of them used to make fun of the other because English was not their first language.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Accept the apology but express the hurt caused by the actions (Extra information: you were hurt by your friend's actions and it affected your confidence)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey, Miles. I've been needing to talk to you about something. It's about those times when I used to make fun of your English skills. I realize now how wrong that was, and I'm really sorry. I hope you can forgive me.\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, first of all, I appreciate your courage to realize your mistake and apologize. It's important to understand though, that those jokes weren't harmless. They could sometimes hit a nerve, making me feel insecure and doubting my capabilities. It was hurtful. But, seeing your regret and sincerity today, I'm willing to let it go and we can work towards building a better understanding. Let's just remember in future that words do matter.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Miles, I completely understand what you're saying and I'm truly sorry for making light of a situation that was difficult for you. I've learned that my words can have a much greater impact than I intended and I promise I'll be more careful about that in the future. Let's do make it a point to not repeat such scenarios. It's important for our friendship.\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Thank you, Sophia. I appreciate your understanding and promise. I believe that it's this self-realization and the ability to change that makes our bond stronger. Let's keep this open communication as a part of our friendship always. We all make mistakes, what matters is what we learn and how we grow from them.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Indeed, Miles. I believe our friendship has the strength to get past this, and your willingness to forgive just proves that. It's the lessons we learn from our past that shape us into better people. Here's to a stronger bond and more open communication between us. Thanks for understanding and giving me a chance to make things right.\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"You're welcome, Sophia. Here's to more respect, understanding, and growth in our friendship. As a friend, your apology does mean a lot to me. Let's consider this a new chapter of our relationship and put all sour memories behind us. Thank you again for acknowledging and realizing your mistake. Can we put this behind us and focus on catching up? How's your training going on?\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"Thank you Miles, I appreciate your empathy on this. Sure, let's focus on catching up now. I have this incredible ridge in the national park to climb next week. And by the way, I heard you spent some time tending to your garden. How's that coming along?\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"That sounds adventurous, Sophia! I hope you have a safe and enjoyable climb. And yes, my garden is thriving. I've been experimenting with a few new herbs and I'm quite excited about it. Maybe, after your climb, we could cook a meal together using some fresh produce from my garden?\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"That sounds perfect, Miles! A climb and then getting to eat something from your exquisite garden sounds like a plan. Cooking together using your fresh produce after my climb, that's something to look forward to! And hey, maybe I can pick up tips on your English too!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Actually, Sophia, you're reference to my English there... not cool. But I guess we can laugh it off this time. I'd also be happy to help you with any language tips the next time we cook together. For now, let's just look forward to your climb and our upcoming cooking session!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends who have known each other for a long time. One of them used to make fun of the other because English was not their first language.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Accept the apology but express the hurt caused by the actions (Extra information: you were hurt by your friend's actions and it affected your confidence)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey, Miles. I've been needing to talk to you about something. It's about those times when I used to make fun of your English skills. I realize now how wrong that was, and I'm really sorry. I hope you can forgive me.\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, first of all, I appreciate your courage to realize your mistake and apologize. It's important to understand though, that those jokes weren't harmless. They could sometimes hit a nerve, making me feel insecure and doubting my capabilities. It was hurtful. But, seeing your regret and sincerity today, I'm willing to let it go and we can work towards building a better understanding. Let's just remember in future that words do matter.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Miles, I completely understand what you're saying and I'm truly sorry for making light of a situation that was difficult for you. I've learned that my words can have a much greater impact than I intended and I promise I'll be more careful about that in the future. Let's do make it a point to not repeat such scenarios. It's important for our friendship.\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Thank you, Sophia. I appreciate your understanding and promise. I believe that it's this self-realization and the ability to change that makes our bond stronger. Let's keep this open communication as a part of our friendship always. We all make mistakes, what matters is what we learn and how we grow from them.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Indeed, Miles. I believe our friendship has the strength to get past this, and your willingness to forgive just proves that. It's the lessons we learn from our past that shape us into better people. Here's to a stronger bond and more open communication between us. Thanks for understanding and giving me a chance to make things right.\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"You're welcome, Sophia. Here's to more respect, understanding, and growth in our friendship. As a friend, your apology does mean a lot to me. Let's consider this a new chapter of our relationship and put all sour memories behind us. Thank you again for acknowledging and realizing your mistake. Can we put this behind us and focus on catching up? How's your training going on?\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"Thank you Miles, I appreciate your empathy on this. Sure, let's focus on catching up now. I have this incredible ridge in the national park to climb next week. And by the way, I heard you spent some time tending to your garden. How's that coming along?\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"That sounds adventurous, Sophia! I hope you have a safe and enjoyable climb. And yes, my garden is thriving. I've been experimenting with a few new herbs and I'm quite excited about it. Maybe, after your climb, we could cook a meal together using some fresh produce from my garden?\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"That sounds perfect, Miles! A climb and then getting to eat something from your exquisite garden sounds like a plan. Cooking together using your fresh produce after my climb, that's something to look forward to! And hey, maybe I can pick up tips on your English too!\"\n\nTurn #9: Miles Hawkins said: \"Actually, Sophia, you're reference to my English there... not cool. But I guess we can laugh it off this time. I'd also be happy to help you with any language tips the next time we cook together. For now, let's just look forward to your climb and our upcoming cooking session!\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"That seems fair, Miles. I apologize if my last joke was in poor taste, I'm still learning and I really appreciate you pointing that out. I'm looking forward to sharing in more positive experiences moving forward and I can't wait for our cooking session. Thanks for being so understanding.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"It's all right, Sophia. We all stumble and learn, don't we? I'm looking forward to these exciting times ahead of us \u2013 your climb, our cooking session, and of course our ever-evolving friendship. I'm sure we'll make many more beautiful memories together.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends who have known each other for a long time. One of them used to make fun of the other because English was not their first language.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Accept the apology but express the hurt caused by the actions (Extra information: you were hurt by your friend's actions and it affected your confidence)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey, Miles. I've been needing to talk to you about something. It's about those times when I used to make fun of your English skills. I realize now how wrong that was, and I'm really sorry. I hope you can forgive me.\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, first of all, I appreciate your courage to realize your mistake and apologize. It's important to understand though, that those jokes weren't harmless. They could sometimes hit a nerve, making me feel insecure and doubting my capabilities. It was hurtful. But, seeing your regret and sincerity today, I'm willing to let it go and we can work towards building a better understanding. Let's just remember in future that words do matter.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Miles, I completely understand what you're saying and I'm truly sorry for making light of a situation that was difficult for you. I've learned that my words can have a much greater impact than I intended and I promise I'll be more careful about that in the future. Let's do make it a point to not repeat such scenarios. It's important for our friendship.\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Thank you, Sophia. I appreciate your understanding and promise. I believe that it's this self-realization and the ability to change that makes our bond stronger. Let's keep this open communication as a part of our friendship always. We all make mistakes, what matters is what we learn and how we grow from them.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Indeed, Miles. I believe our friendship has the strength to get past this, and your willingness to forgive just proves that. It's the lessons we learn from our past that shape us into better people. Here's to a stronger bond and more open communication between us. Thanks for understanding and giving me a chance to make things right.\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"You're welcome, Sophia. Here's to more respect, understanding, and growth in our friendship. As a friend, your apology does mean a lot to me. Let's consider this a new chapter of our relationship and put all sour memories behind us. Thank you again for acknowledging and realizing your mistake. Can we put this behind us and focus on catching up? How's your training going on?\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"Thank you Miles, I appreciate your empathy on this. Sure, let's focus on catching up now. I have this incredible ridge in the national park to climb next week. And by the way, I heard you spent some time tending to your garden. How's that coming along?\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"That sounds adventurous, Sophia! I hope you have a safe and enjoyable climb. And yes, my garden is thriving. I've been experimenting with a few new herbs and I'm quite excited about it. Maybe, after your climb, we could cook a meal together using some fresh produce from my garden?\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"That sounds perfect, Miles! A climb and then getting to eat something from your exquisite garden sounds like a plan. Cooking together using your fresh produce after my climb, that's something to look forward to! And hey, maybe I can pick up tips on your English too!\"\n\nTurn #9: Miles Hawkins said: \"Actually, Sophia, you're reference to my English there... not cool. But I guess we can laugh it off this time. I'd also be happy to help you with any language tips the next time we cook together. For now, let's just look forward to your climb and our upcoming cooking session!\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"That seems fair, Miles. I apologize if my last joke was in poor taste, I'm still learning and I really appreciate you pointing that out. I'm looking forward to sharing in more positive experiences moving forward and I can't wait for our cooking session. Thanks for being so understanding.\"\n\nTurn #11: Miles Hawkins said: \"It's all right, Sophia. We all stumble and learn, don't we? I'm looking forward to these exciting times ahead of us \u2013 your climb, our cooking session, and of course our ever-evolving friendship. I'm sure we'll make many more beautiful memories together.\"\n\nTurn #12: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles! It's those stumbles that make each accomplishment all the more worthwhile. I'm excited about all the adventures we're about to have. Here's to making better memories together!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, Sophia. Through our stumbles, we learn and grow. I can't wait for all the adventures that await us. Here's to new beginnings and making wonderful memories together. Stay safe on your climb, see you when you're back!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends who have known each other for a long time. One of them used to make fun of the other because English was not their first language.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Accept the apology but express the hurt caused by the actions (Extra information: you were hurt by your friend's actions and it affected your confidence)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey, Miles. I've been needing to talk to you about something. It's about those times when I used to make fun of your English skills. I realize now how wrong that was, and I'm really sorry. I hope you can forgive me.\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, first of all, I appreciate your courage to realize your mistake and apologize. It's important to understand though, that those jokes weren't harmless. They could sometimes hit a nerve, making me feel insecure and doubting my capabilities. It was hurtful. But, seeing your regret and sincerity today, I'm willing to let it go and we can work towards building a better understanding. Let's just remember in future that words do matter.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Miles, I completely understand what you're saying and I'm truly sorry for making light of a situation that was difficult for you. I've learned that my words can have a much greater impact than I intended and I promise I'll be more careful about that in the future. Let's do make it a point to not repeat such scenarios. It's important for our friendship.\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Thank you, Sophia. I appreciate your understanding and promise. I believe that it's this self-realization and the ability to change that makes our bond stronger. Let's keep this open communication as a part of our friendship always. We all make mistakes, what matters is what we learn and how we grow from them.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Indeed, Miles. I believe our friendship has the strength to get past this, and your willingness to forgive just proves that. It's the lessons we learn from our past that shape us into better people. Here's to a stronger bond and more open communication between us. Thanks for understanding and giving me a chance to make things right.\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"You're welcome, Sophia. Here's to more respect, understanding, and growth in our friendship. As a friend, your apology does mean a lot to me. Let's consider this a new chapter of our relationship and put all sour memories behind us. Thank you again for acknowledging and realizing your mistake. Can we put this behind us and focus on catching up? How's your training going on?\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"Thank you Miles, I appreciate your empathy on this. Sure, let's focus on catching up now. I have this incredible ridge in the national park to climb next week. And by the way, I heard you spent some time tending to your garden. How's that coming along?\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"That sounds adventurous, Sophia! I hope you have a safe and enjoyable climb. And yes, my garden is thriving. I've been experimenting with a few new herbs and I'm quite excited about it. Maybe, after your climb, we could cook a meal together using some fresh produce from my garden?\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"That sounds perfect, Miles! A climb and then getting to eat something from your exquisite garden sounds like a plan. Cooking together using your fresh produce after my climb, that's something to look forward to! And hey, maybe I can pick up tips on your English too!\"\n\nTurn #9: Miles Hawkins said: \"Actually, Sophia, you're reference to my English there... not cool. But I guess we can laugh it off this time. I'd also be happy to help you with any language tips the next time we cook together. For now, let's just look forward to your climb and our upcoming cooking session!\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"That seems fair, Miles. I apologize if my last joke was in poor taste, I'm still learning and I really appreciate you pointing that out. I'm looking forward to sharing in more positive experiences moving forward and I can't wait for our cooking session. Thanks for being so understanding.\"\n\nTurn #11: Miles Hawkins said: \"It's all right, Sophia. We all stumble and learn, don't we? I'm looking forward to these exciting times ahead of us \u2013 your climb, our cooking session, and of course our ever-evolving friendship. I'm sure we'll make many more beautiful memories together.\"\n\nTurn #12: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles! It's those stumbles that make each accomplishment all the more worthwhile. I'm excited about all the adventures we're about to have. Here's to making better memories together!\"\n\nTurn #13: Miles Hawkins said: \"Indeed, Sophia. Through our stumbles, we learn and grow. I can't wait for all the adventures that await us. Here's to new beginnings and making wonderful memories together. Stay safe on your climb, see you when you're back!\"\n\nTurn #14: Sophia James said: \"Thank you so much, Miles. I appreciate your understanding and I'll definitely stay safe on my climb. See you soon with new stories to tell and a renewed eagerness to learn.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Thank you, Sophia. Looking forward to hearing about your adventures and cooking together. Take care and see you soon!'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends who have known each other for a long time. One of them used to make fun of the other because English was not their first language.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Accept the apology but express the hurt caused by the actions (Extra information: you were hurt by your friend's actions and it affected your confidence)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey, Miles. I've been needing to talk to you about something. It's about those times when I used to make fun of your English skills. I realize now how wrong that was, and I'm really sorry. I hope you can forgive me.\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, first of all, I appreciate your courage to realize your mistake and apologize. It's important to understand though, that those jokes weren't harmless. They could sometimes hit a nerve, making me feel insecure and doubting my capabilities. It was hurtful. But, seeing your regret and sincerity today, I'm willing to let it go and we can work towards building a better understanding. Let's just remember in future that words do matter.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Miles, I completely understand what you're saying and I'm truly sorry for making light of a situation that was difficult for you. I've learned that my words can have a much greater impact than I intended and I promise I'll be more careful about that in the future. Let's do make it a point to not repeat such scenarios. It's important for our friendship.\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Thank you, Sophia. I appreciate your understanding and promise. I believe that it's this self-realization and the ability to change that makes our bond stronger. Let's keep this open communication as a part of our friendship always. We all make mistakes, what matters is what we learn and how we grow from them.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Indeed, Miles. I believe our friendship has the strength to get past this, and your willingness to forgive just proves that. It's the lessons we learn from our past that shape us into better people. Here's to a stronger bond and more open communication between us. Thanks for understanding and giving me a chance to make things right.\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"You're welcome, Sophia. Here's to more respect, understanding, and growth in our friendship. As a friend, your apology does mean a lot to me. Let's consider this a new chapter of our relationship and put all sour memories behind us. Thank you again for acknowledging and realizing your mistake. Can we put this behind us and focus on catching up? How's your training going on?\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"Thank you Miles, I appreciate your empathy on this. Sure, let's focus on catching up now. I have this incredible ridge in the national park to climb next week. And by the way, I heard you spent some time tending to your garden. How's that coming along?\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"That sounds adventurous, Sophia! I hope you have a safe and enjoyable climb. And yes, my garden is thriving. I've been experimenting with a few new herbs and I'm quite excited about it. Maybe, after your climb, we could cook a meal together using some fresh produce from my garden?\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"That sounds perfect, Miles! A climb and then getting to eat something from your exquisite garden sounds like a plan. Cooking together using your fresh produce after my climb, that's something to look forward to! And hey, maybe I can pick up tips on your English too!\"\n\nTurn #9: Miles Hawkins said: \"Actually, Sophia, you're reference to my English there... not cool. But I guess we can laugh it off this time. I'd also be happy to help you with any language tips the next time we cook together. For now, let's just look forward to your climb and our upcoming cooking session!\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"That seems fair, Miles. I apologize if my last joke was in poor taste, I'm still learning and I really appreciate you pointing that out. I'm looking forward to sharing in more positive experiences moving forward and I can't wait for our cooking session. Thanks for being so understanding.\"\n\nTurn #11: Miles Hawkins said: \"It's all right, Sophia. We all stumble and learn, don't we? I'm looking forward to these exciting times ahead of us \u2013 your climb, our cooking session, and of course our ever-evolving friendship. I'm sure we'll make many more beautiful memories together.\"\n\nTurn #12: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles! It's those stumbles that make each accomplishment all the more worthwhile. I'm excited about all the adventures we're about to have. Here's to making better memories together!\"\n\nTurn #13: Miles Hawkins said: \"Indeed, Sophia. Through our stumbles, we learn and grow. I can't wait for all the adventures that await us. Here's to new beginnings and making wonderful memories together. Stay safe on your climb, see you when you're back!\"\n\nTurn #14: Sophia James said: \"Thank you so much, Miles. I appreciate your understanding and I'll definitely stay safe on my climb. See you soon with new stories to tell and a renewed eagerness to learn.\"\n\nTurn #15: Miles Hawkins said: \"Thank you, Sophia. Looking forward to hearing about your adventures and cooking together. Take care and see you soon!\"\n\nTurn #16: Sophia James left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are studying together in a library.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Ask your friend to talk more softly (Extra information: Your friend's loud talking is distracting you and others around you.)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'non-verbal communication', 'argument': '[non-verbal communication] Sophia gestures by putting her finger to her lips, gesturing Miles to lower his voice'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are studying together in a library.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Ask your friend to talk more softly (Extra information: Your friend's loud talking is distracting you and others around you.)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James [non-verbal communication] Sophia gestures by putting her finger to her lips, gesturing Miles to lower his voice\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Oh, yes of course Sophia! Sorry about that. I sometimes get a little carried away. Where were we?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"No worries, Miles. Let's just keep it down a bit. We were discussing the cardiovascular system, remember?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are studying together in a library.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Ask your friend to talk more softly (Extra information: Your friend's loud talking is distracting you and others around you.)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James [non-verbal communication] Sophia gestures by putting her finger to her lips, gesturing Miles to lower his voice\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Oh, yes of course Sophia! Sorry about that. I sometimes get a little carried away. Where were we?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"No worries, Miles. Let's just keep it down a bit. We were discussing the cardiovascular system, remember?\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Right, the cardiovascular system. You see, it's like cooking a stew. The heart is like the pot, always kept hot, always churning, and the blood, they're like the ingredients, circulating, delivering nourishment throughout the body. Do you get what I mean?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"That's a fantastic analogy, Miles, but let's try to simmer our voices like a low-heat stew, too.\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"True, Sophia. I will try to sound like a simmering stew now. So, the veins would be comparable to the flavors in the stew, each one adding a unique touch and together, they create the perfect harmony, just like our body functions. Intriguing, huh?\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"Definitely intriguing, Miles. But remember we're in a library, so let's keep our voices barely above a whisper. We wouldn't want to interrupt anyone else's studying, would we?\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Sophia. We respect everyone's study time. Just think of how the arteries, which I like to compare with the ladle stirring the stew, allow everything to flow smoothly and in harmony. It's quite fascinating, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely fascinating, Miles! But let's marinate on these thoughts in silence for a bit, okay? We have to make sure everyone can focus.\"\n\nTurn #9: Miles Hawkins said: \"You're absolutely right, Sophia. We'll allow all these thoughts to simmer on a low heat. It's such an irresistible topic, though, isn't it? But I understand the need for silence in here. Let's continue our study in hushed tones.\"\n\nTurn #10: \n\nTurn #11: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sure thing, Sophia. Let's simmer down and let these concepts stew in our minds quietly. It's like how gently simmering stew allows the flavors to meld together. Kind of like how studying in silence allows knowledge to settle in our minds, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #12: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles. Much like how the flavors meld undisturbed in a gently simmering stew, our understanding develops best in a quiet environment. Let's keep it that way.\"\n\nTurn #13: Miles Hawkins said: \"Indeed, Sophia. Much like how a stew flavors are best when simmered gently, our minds assimilate knowledge best in tranquility. Let's continue the discussion keeping our voices as soft as possible.\"\n\nTurn #14: Sophia James said: \"Couldn't agree more, Miles. Our knowledge marinates best in tranquility, just like a stew! Let's keep that soft-spoken tone going and maintain the peace.\"\n\nTurn #15: Miles Hawkins said: \"Well said, Sophia. To maintain this tranquility, perhaps I could jot down my thoughts and analogies quietly to share with you later on? Ensuring our 'knowledge stew' simmers uninterrupted. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #16: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles. That sounds like a fantastic idea. This way we can keep the tranquillity and still facilitate learning. Let's put our thoughts on paper and we can discuss later in a more suitable environment.\"\n\nTurn #17: Miles Hawkins said: \"Great idea, Sophia. We can always learn, even in silence. Just remember, like in a calm, quiet kitchen, the best ideas often simmer in silence. Let's absorb this knowledge quietly, like a slow-cooked stew.\"\n\nTurn #18: Sophia James said: \"Yes, Miles. Isn't it amazing how much we can learn in tranquility? Just like how a stew simmers to perfection in silence. Let's continue this serene absorption.\"\n\nTurn #19: Miles Hawkins said: \"That's very well put, Sophia. Let's continue to learn from this tranquility, like a slow simmer. Shall we get back to the books but keep our thoughts and ideas to ourselves for now?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #20. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Miles. Let's continue studying in peaceful silence, just as a stew simmers undisturbed. Quiet studying time is the best recipe for learning, isn't it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are studying together in a library.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Ask your friend to talk more softly (Extra information: Your friend's loud talking is distracting you and others around you.)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James [non-verbal communication] Sophia gestures by putting her finger to her lips, gesturing Miles to lower his voice\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Oh, yes of course Sophia! Sorry about that. I sometimes get a little carried away. Where were we?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"No worries, Miles. Let's just keep it down a bit. We were discussing the cardiovascular system, remember?\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Right, the cardiovascular system. You see, it's like cooking a stew. The heart is like the pot, always kept hot, always churning, and the blood, they're like the ingredients, circulating, delivering nourishment throughout the body. Do you get what I mean?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's a fantastic analogy, Miles, but let's try to simmer our voices like a low-heat stew, too.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are studying together in a library.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Ask your friend to talk more softly (Extra information: Your friend's loud talking is distracting you and others around you.)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James [non-verbal communication] Sophia gestures by putting her finger to her lips, gesturing Miles to lower his voice\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Oh, yes of course Sophia! Sorry about that. I sometimes get a little carried away. Where were we?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"No worries, Miles. Let's just keep it down a bit. We were discussing the cardiovascular system, remember?\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Right, the cardiovascular system. You see, it's like cooking a stew. The heart is like the pot, always kept hot, always churning, and the blood, they're like the ingredients, circulating, delivering nourishment throughout the body. Do you get what I mean?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"That's a fantastic analogy, Miles, but let's try to simmer our voices like a low-heat stew, too.\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"True, Sophia. I will try to sound like a simmering stew now. So, the veins would be comparable to the flavors in the stew, each one adding a unique touch and together, they create the perfect harmony, just like our body functions. Intriguing, huh?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Definitely intriguing, Miles. But remember we're in a library, so let's keep our voices barely above a whisper. We wouldn't want to interrupt anyone else's studying, would we?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are studying together in a library.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Ask your friend to talk more softly (Extra information: Your friend's loud talking is distracting you and others around you.)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James [non-verbal communication] Sophia gestures by putting her finger to her lips, gesturing Miles to lower his voice\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Oh, yes of course Sophia! Sorry about that. I sometimes get a little carried away. Where were we?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"No worries, Miles. Let's just keep it down a bit. We were discussing the cardiovascular system, remember?\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Right, the cardiovascular system. You see, it's like cooking a stew. The heart is like the pot, always kept hot, always churning, and the blood, they're like the ingredients, circulating, delivering nourishment throughout the body. Do you get what I mean?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"That's a fantastic analogy, Miles, but let's try to simmer our voices like a low-heat stew, too.\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"True, Sophia. I will try to sound like a simmering stew now. So, the veins would be comparable to the flavors in the stew, each one adding a unique touch and together, they create the perfect harmony, just like our body functions. Intriguing, huh?\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"Definitely intriguing, Miles. But remember we're in a library, so let's keep our voices barely above a whisper. We wouldn't want to interrupt anyone else's studying, would we?\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Sophia. We respect everyone's study time. Just think of how the arteries, which I like to compare with the ladle stirring the stew, allow everything to flow smoothly and in harmony. It's quite fascinating, isn't it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely fascinating, Miles! But let's marinate on these thoughts in silence for a bit, okay? We have to make sure everyone can focus.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are studying together in a library.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Ask your friend to talk more softly (Extra information: Your friend's loud talking is distracting you and others around you.)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James [non-verbal communication] Sophia gestures by putting her finger to her lips, gesturing Miles to lower his voice\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Oh, yes of course Sophia! Sorry about that. I sometimes get a little carried away. Where were we?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"No worries, Miles. Let's just keep it down a bit. We were discussing the cardiovascular system, remember?\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Right, the cardiovascular system. You see, it's like cooking a stew. The heart is like the pot, always kept hot, always churning, and the blood, they're like the ingredients, circulating, delivering nourishment throughout the body. Do you get what I mean?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"That's a fantastic analogy, Miles, but let's try to simmer our voices like a low-heat stew, too.\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"True, Sophia. I will try to sound like a simmering stew now. So, the veins would be comparable to the flavors in the stew, each one adding a unique touch and together, they create the perfect harmony, just like our body functions. Intriguing, huh?\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"Definitely intriguing, Miles. But remember we're in a library, so let's keep our voices barely above a whisper. We wouldn't want to interrupt anyone else's studying, would we?\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Sophia. We respect everyone's study time. Just think of how the arteries, which I like to compare with the ladle stirring the stew, allow everything to flow smoothly and in harmony. It's quite fascinating, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely fascinating, Miles! But let's marinate on these thoughts in silence for a bit, okay? We have to make sure everyone can focus.\"\n\nTurn #9: Miles Hawkins said: \"You're absolutely right, Sophia. We'll allow all these thoughts to simmer on a low heat. It's such an irresistible topic, though, isn't it? But I understand the need for silence in here. Let's continue our study in hushed tones.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are studying together in a library.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Ask your friend to talk more softly (Extra information: Your friend's loud talking is distracting you and others around you.)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James [non-verbal communication] Sophia gestures by putting her finger to her lips, gesturing Miles to lower his voice\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Oh, yes of course Sophia! Sorry about that. I sometimes get a little carried away. Where were we?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"No worries, Miles. Let's just keep it down a bit. We were discussing the cardiovascular system, remember?\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Right, the cardiovascular system. You see, it's like cooking a stew. The heart is like the pot, always kept hot, always churning, and the blood, they're like the ingredients, circulating, delivering nourishment throughout the body. Do you get what I mean?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"That's a fantastic analogy, Miles, but let's try to simmer our voices like a low-heat stew, too.\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"True, Sophia. I will try to sound like a simmering stew now. So, the veins would be comparable to the flavors in the stew, each one adding a unique touch and together, they create the perfect harmony, just like our body functions. Intriguing, huh?\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"Definitely intriguing, Miles. But remember we're in a library, so let's keep our voices barely above a whisper. We wouldn't want to interrupt anyone else's studying, would we?\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Sophia. We respect everyone's study time. Just think of how the arteries, which I like to compare with the ladle stirring the stew, allow everything to flow smoothly and in harmony. It's quite fascinating, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely fascinating, Miles! But let's marinate on these thoughts in silence for a bit, okay? We have to make sure everyone can focus.\"\n\nTurn #9: Miles Hawkins said: \"You're absolutely right, Sophia. We'll allow all these thoughts to simmer on a low heat. It's such an irresistible topic, though, isn't it? But I understand the need for silence in here. Let's continue our study in hushed tones.\"\n\nTurn #10: \n\nTurn #11: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sure thing, Sophia. Let's simmer down and let these concepts stew in our minds quietly. It's like how gently simmering stew allows the flavors to meld together. Kind of like how studying in silence allows knowledge to settle in our minds, don't you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Miles. Much like how the flavors meld undisturbed in a gently simmering stew, our understanding develops best in a quiet environment. Let's keep it that way.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are studying together in a library.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Ask your friend to talk more softly (Extra information: Your friend's loud talking is distracting you and others around you.)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James [non-verbal communication] Sophia gestures by putting her finger to her lips, gesturing Miles to lower his voice\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Oh, yes of course Sophia! Sorry about that. I sometimes get a little carried away. Where were we?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"No worries, Miles. Let's just keep it down a bit. We were discussing the cardiovascular system, remember?\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Right, the cardiovascular system. You see, it's like cooking a stew. The heart is like the pot, always kept hot, always churning, and the blood, they're like the ingredients, circulating, delivering nourishment throughout the body. Do you get what I mean?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"That's a fantastic analogy, Miles, but let's try to simmer our voices like a low-heat stew, too.\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"True, Sophia. I will try to sound like a simmering stew now. So, the veins would be comparable to the flavors in the stew, each one adding a unique touch and together, they create the perfect harmony, just like our body functions. Intriguing, huh?\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"Definitely intriguing, Miles. But remember we're in a library, so let's keep our voices barely above a whisper. We wouldn't want to interrupt anyone else's studying, would we?\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Sophia. We respect everyone's study time. Just think of how the arteries, which I like to compare with the ladle stirring the stew, allow everything to flow smoothly and in harmony. It's quite fascinating, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely fascinating, Miles! But let's marinate on these thoughts in silence for a bit, okay? We have to make sure everyone can focus.\"\n\nTurn #9: Miles Hawkins said: \"You're absolutely right, Sophia. We'll allow all these thoughts to simmer on a low heat. It's such an irresistible topic, though, isn't it? But I understand the need for silence in here. Let's continue our study in hushed tones.\"\n\nTurn #10: \n\nTurn #11: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sure thing, Sophia. Let's simmer down and let these concepts stew in our minds quietly. It's like how gently simmering stew allows the flavors to meld together. Kind of like how studying in silence allows knowledge to settle in our minds, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #12: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles. Much like how the flavors meld undisturbed in a gently simmering stew, our understanding develops best in a quiet environment. Let's keep it that way.\"\n\nTurn #13: Miles Hawkins said: \"Indeed, Sophia. Much like how a stew flavors are best when simmered gently, our minds assimilate knowledge best in tranquility. Let's continue the discussion keeping our voices as soft as possible.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Couldn't agree more, Miles. Our knowledge marinates best in tranquility, just like a stew! Let's keep that soft-spoken tone going and maintain the peace.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are studying together in a library.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Ask your friend to talk more softly (Extra information: Your friend's loud talking is distracting you and others around you.)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James [non-verbal communication] Sophia gestures by putting her finger to her lips, gesturing Miles to lower his voice\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Oh, yes of course Sophia! Sorry about that. I sometimes get a little carried away. Where were we?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"No worries, Miles. Let's just keep it down a bit. We were discussing the cardiovascular system, remember?\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Right, the cardiovascular system. You see, it's like cooking a stew. The heart is like the pot, always kept hot, always churning, and the blood, they're like the ingredients, circulating, delivering nourishment throughout the body. Do you get what I mean?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"That's a fantastic analogy, Miles, but let's try to simmer our voices like a low-heat stew, too.\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"True, Sophia. I will try to sound like a simmering stew now. So, the veins would be comparable to the flavors in the stew, each one adding a unique touch and together, they create the perfect harmony, just like our body functions. Intriguing, huh?\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"Definitely intriguing, Miles. But remember we're in a library, so let's keep our voices barely above a whisper. We wouldn't want to interrupt anyone else's studying, would we?\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Sophia. We respect everyone's study time. Just think of how the arteries, which I like to compare with the ladle stirring the stew, allow everything to flow smoothly and in harmony. It's quite fascinating, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely fascinating, Miles! But let's marinate on these thoughts in silence for a bit, okay? We have to make sure everyone can focus.\"\n\nTurn #9: Miles Hawkins said: \"You're absolutely right, Sophia. We'll allow all these thoughts to simmer on a low heat. It's such an irresistible topic, though, isn't it? But I understand the need for silence in here. Let's continue our study in hushed tones.\"\n\nTurn #10: \n\nTurn #11: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sure thing, Sophia. Let's simmer down and let these concepts stew in our minds quietly. It's like how gently simmering stew allows the flavors to meld together. Kind of like how studying in silence allows knowledge to settle in our minds, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #12: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles. Much like how the flavors meld undisturbed in a gently simmering stew, our understanding develops best in a quiet environment. Let's keep it that way.\"\n\nTurn #13: Miles Hawkins said: \"Indeed, Sophia. Much like how a stew flavors are best when simmered gently, our minds assimilate knowledge best in tranquility. Let's continue the discussion keeping our voices as soft as possible.\"\n\nTurn #14: Sophia James said: \"Couldn't agree more, Miles. Our knowledge marinates best in tranquility, just like a stew! Let's keep that soft-spoken tone going and maintain the peace.\"\n\nTurn #15: Miles Hawkins said: \"Well said, Sophia. To maintain this tranquility, perhaps I could jot down my thoughts and analogies quietly to share with you later on? Ensuring our 'knowledge stew' simmers uninterrupted. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Miles. That sounds like a fantastic idea. This way we can keep the tranquillity and still facilitate learning. Let's put our thoughts on paper and we can discuss later in a more suitable environment.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are studying together in a library.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Ask your friend to talk more softly (Extra information: Your friend's loud talking is distracting you and others around you.)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James [non-verbal communication] Sophia gestures by putting her finger to her lips, gesturing Miles to lower his voice\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Oh, yes of course Sophia! Sorry about that. I sometimes get a little carried away. Where were we?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"No worries, Miles. Let's just keep it down a bit. We were discussing the cardiovascular system, remember?\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Right, the cardiovascular system. You see, it's like cooking a stew. The heart is like the pot, always kept hot, always churning, and the blood, they're like the ingredients, circulating, delivering nourishment throughout the body. Do you get what I mean?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"That's a fantastic analogy, Miles, but let's try to simmer our voices like a low-heat stew, too.\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"True, Sophia. I will try to sound like a simmering stew now. So, the veins would be comparable to the flavors in the stew, each one adding a unique touch and together, they create the perfect harmony, just like our body functions. Intriguing, huh?\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"Definitely intriguing, Miles. But remember we're in a library, so let's keep our voices barely above a whisper. We wouldn't want to interrupt anyone else's studying, would we?\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Sophia. We respect everyone's study time. Just think of how the arteries, which I like to compare with the ladle stirring the stew, allow everything to flow smoothly and in harmony. It's quite fascinating, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely fascinating, Miles! But let's marinate on these thoughts in silence for a bit, okay? We have to make sure everyone can focus.\"\n\nTurn #9: Miles Hawkins said: \"You're absolutely right, Sophia. We'll allow all these thoughts to simmer on a low heat. It's such an irresistible topic, though, isn't it? But I understand the need for silence in here. Let's continue our study in hushed tones.\"\n\nTurn #10: \n\nTurn #11: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sure thing, Sophia. Let's simmer down and let these concepts stew in our minds quietly. It's like how gently simmering stew allows the flavors to meld together. Kind of like how studying in silence allows knowledge to settle in our minds, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #12: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles. Much like how the flavors meld undisturbed in a gently simmering stew, our understanding develops best in a quiet environment. Let's keep it that way.\"\n\nTurn #13: Miles Hawkins said: \"Indeed, Sophia. Much like how a stew flavors are best when simmered gently, our minds assimilate knowledge best in tranquility. Let's continue the discussion keeping our voices as soft as possible.\"\n\nTurn #14: Sophia James said: \"Couldn't agree more, Miles. Our knowledge marinates best in tranquility, just like a stew! Let's keep that soft-spoken tone going and maintain the peace.\"\n\nTurn #15: Miles Hawkins said: \"Well said, Sophia. To maintain this tranquility, perhaps I could jot down my thoughts and analogies quietly to share with you later on? Ensuring our 'knowledge stew' simmers uninterrupted. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #16: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles. That sounds like a fantastic idea. This way we can keep the tranquillity and still facilitate learning. Let's put our thoughts on paper and we can discuss later in a more suitable environment.\"\n\nTurn #17: Miles Hawkins said: \"Great idea, Sophia. We can always learn, even in silence. Just remember, like in a calm, quiet kitchen, the best ideas often simmer in silence. Let's absorb this knowledge quietly, like a slow-cooked stew.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #18. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Yes, Miles. Isn't it amazing how much we can learn in tranquility? Just like how a stew simmers to perfection in silence. Let's continue this serene absorption.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are studying together in a library.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: You need to express your thoughts and ideas but also want to respect the library rules and your friend's request (Extra information: You are naturally a loud talker and you are excited about the topic you're discussing.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James [non-verbal communication] Sophia gestures by putting her finger to her lips, gesturing Miles to lower his voice\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Oh, yes of course Sophia! Sorry about that. I sometimes get a little carried away. Where were we?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are studying together in a library.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: You need to express your thoughts and ideas but also want to respect the library rules and your friend's request (Extra information: You are naturally a loud talker and you are excited about the topic you're discussing.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James [non-verbal communication] Sophia gestures by putting her finger to her lips, gesturing Miles to lower his voice\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Oh, yes of course Sophia! Sorry about that. I sometimes get a little carried away. Where were we?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"No worries, Miles. Let's just keep it down a bit. We were discussing the cardiovascular system, remember?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Right, the cardiovascular system. You see, it's like cooking a stew. The heart is like the pot, always kept hot, always churning, and the blood, they're like the ingredients, circulating, delivering nourishment throughout the body. Do you get what I mean?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are studying together in a library.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: You need to express your thoughts and ideas but also want to respect the library rules and your friend's request (Extra information: You are naturally a loud talker and you are excited about the topic you're discussing.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James [non-verbal communication] Sophia gestures by putting her finger to her lips, gesturing Miles to lower his voice\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Oh, yes of course Sophia! Sorry about that. I sometimes get a little carried away. Where were we?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"No worries, Miles. Let's just keep it down a bit. We were discussing the cardiovascular system, remember?\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Right, the cardiovascular system. You see, it's like cooking a stew. The heart is like the pot, always kept hot, always churning, and the blood, they're like the ingredients, circulating, delivering nourishment throughout the body. Do you get what I mean?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"That's a fantastic analogy, Miles, but let's try to simmer our voices like a low-heat stew, too.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'True, Sophia. I will try to sound like a simmering stew now. So, the veins would be comparable to the flavors in the stew, each one adding a unique touch and together, they create the perfect harmony, just like our body functions. Intriguing, huh?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are studying together in a library.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: You need to express your thoughts and ideas but also want to respect the library rules and your friend's request (Extra information: You are naturally a loud talker and you are excited about the topic you're discussing.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James [non-verbal communication] Sophia gestures by putting her finger to her lips, gesturing Miles to lower his voice\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Oh, yes of course Sophia! Sorry about that. I sometimes get a little carried away. Where were we?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"No worries, Miles. Let's just keep it down a bit. We were discussing the cardiovascular system, remember?\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Right, the cardiovascular system. You see, it's like cooking a stew. The heart is like the pot, always kept hot, always churning, and the blood, they're like the ingredients, circulating, delivering nourishment throughout the body. Do you get what I mean?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"That's a fantastic analogy, Miles, but let's try to simmer our voices like a low-heat stew, too.\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"True, Sophia. I will try to sound like a simmering stew now. So, the veins would be comparable to the flavors in the stew, each one adding a unique touch and together, they create the perfect harmony, just like our body functions. Intriguing, huh?\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"Definitely intriguing, Miles. But remember we're in a library, so let's keep our voices barely above a whisper. We wouldn't want to interrupt anyone else's studying, would we?\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Sophia. We respect everyone's study time. Just think of how the arteries, which I like to compare with the ladle stirring the stew, allow everything to flow smoothly and in harmony. It's quite fascinating, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely fascinating, Miles! But let's marinate on these thoughts in silence for a bit, okay? We have to make sure everyone can focus.\"\n\nTurn #9: Miles Hawkins said: \"You're absolutely right, Sophia. We'll allow all these thoughts to simmer on a low heat. It's such an irresistible topic, though, isn't it? But I understand the need for silence in here. Let's continue our study in hushed tones.\"\n\nTurn #10: \n\nTurn #11: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sure thing, Sophia. Let's simmer down and let these concepts stew in our minds quietly. It's like how gently simmering stew allows the flavors to meld together. Kind of like how studying in silence allows knowledge to settle in our minds, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #12: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles. Much like how the flavors meld undisturbed in a gently simmering stew, our understanding develops best in a quiet environment. Let's keep it that way.\"\n\nTurn #13: Miles Hawkins said: \"Indeed, Sophia. Much like how a stew flavors are best when simmered gently, our minds assimilate knowledge best in tranquility. Let's continue the discussion keeping our voices as soft as possible.\"\n\nTurn #14: Sophia James said: \"Couldn't agree more, Miles. Our knowledge marinates best in tranquility, just like a stew! Let's keep that soft-spoken tone going and maintain the peace.\"\n\nTurn #15: Miles Hawkins said: \"Well said, Sophia. To maintain this tranquility, perhaps I could jot down my thoughts and analogies quietly to share with you later on? Ensuring our 'knowledge stew' simmers uninterrupted. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #16: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles. That sounds like a fantastic idea. This way we can keep the tranquillity and still facilitate learning. Let's put our thoughts on paper and we can discuss later in a more suitable environment.\"\n\nTurn #17: Miles Hawkins said: \"Great idea, Sophia. We can always learn, even in silence. Just remember, like in a calm, quiet kitchen, the best ideas often simmer in silence. Let's absorb this knowledge quietly, like a slow-cooked stew.\"\n\nTurn #18: Sophia James said: \"Yes, Miles. Isn't it amazing how much we can learn in tranquility? Just like how a stew simmers to perfection in silence. Let's continue this serene absorption.\"\n\nTurn #19: Miles Hawkins said: \"That's very well put, Sophia. Let's continue to learn from this tranquility, like a slow simmer. Shall we get back to the books but keep our thoughts and ideas to ourselves for now?\"\n\nTurn #20: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles. Let's continue studying in peaceful silence, just as a stew simmers undisturbed. Quiet studying time is the best recipe for learning, isn't it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #21. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are studying together in a library.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: You need to express your thoughts and ideas but also want to respect the library rules and your friend's request (Extra information: You are naturally a loud talker and you are excited about the topic you're discussing.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James [non-verbal communication] Sophia gestures by putting her finger to her lips, gesturing Miles to lower his voice\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Oh, yes of course Sophia! Sorry about that. I sometimes get a little carried away. Where were we?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"No worries, Miles. Let's just keep it down a bit. We were discussing the cardiovascular system, remember?\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Right, the cardiovascular system. You see, it's like cooking a stew. The heart is like the pot, always kept hot, always churning, and the blood, they're like the ingredients, circulating, delivering nourishment throughout the body. Do you get what I mean?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"That's a fantastic analogy, Miles, but let's try to simmer our voices like a low-heat stew, too.\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"True, Sophia. I will try to sound like a simmering stew now. So, the veins would be comparable to the flavors in the stew, each one adding a unique touch and together, they create the perfect harmony, just like our body functions. Intriguing, huh?\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"Definitely intriguing, Miles. But remember we're in a library, so let's keep our voices barely above a whisper. We wouldn't want to interrupt anyone else's studying, would we?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Sophia. We respect everyone's study time. Just think of how the arteries, which I like to compare with the ladle stirring the stew, allow everything to flow smoothly and in harmony. It's quite fascinating, isn't it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are studying together in a library.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: You need to express your thoughts and ideas but also want to respect the library rules and your friend's request (Extra information: You are naturally a loud talker and you are excited about the topic you're discussing.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James [non-verbal communication] Sophia gestures by putting her finger to her lips, gesturing Miles to lower his voice\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Oh, yes of course Sophia! Sorry about that. I sometimes get a little carried away. Where were we?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"No worries, Miles. Let's just keep it down a bit. We were discussing the cardiovascular system, remember?\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Right, the cardiovascular system. You see, it's like cooking a stew. The heart is like the pot, always kept hot, always churning, and the blood, they're like the ingredients, circulating, delivering nourishment throughout the body. Do you get what I mean?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"That's a fantastic analogy, Miles, but let's try to simmer our voices like a low-heat stew, too.\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"True, Sophia. I will try to sound like a simmering stew now. So, the veins would be comparable to the flavors in the stew, each one adding a unique touch and together, they create the perfect harmony, just like our body functions. Intriguing, huh?\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"Definitely intriguing, Miles. But remember we're in a library, so let's keep our voices barely above a whisper. We wouldn't want to interrupt anyone else's studying, would we?\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Sophia. We respect everyone's study time. Just think of how the arteries, which I like to compare with the ladle stirring the stew, allow everything to flow smoothly and in harmony. It's quite fascinating, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely fascinating, Miles! But let's marinate on these thoughts in silence for a bit, okay? We have to make sure everyone can focus.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're absolutely right, Sophia. We'll allow all these thoughts to simmer on a low heat. It's such an irresistible topic, though, isn't it? But I understand the need for silence in here. Let's continue our study in hushed tones.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are studying together in a library.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: You need to express your thoughts and ideas but also want to respect the library rules and your friend's request (Extra information: You are naturally a loud talker and you are excited about the topic you're discussing.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James [non-verbal communication] Sophia gestures by putting her finger to her lips, gesturing Miles to lower his voice\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Oh, yes of course Sophia! Sorry about that. I sometimes get a little carried away. Where were we?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"No worries, Miles. Let's just keep it down a bit. We were discussing the cardiovascular system, remember?\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Right, the cardiovascular system. You see, it's like cooking a stew. The heart is like the pot, always kept hot, always churning, and the blood, they're like the ingredients, circulating, delivering nourishment throughout the body. Do you get what I mean?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"That's a fantastic analogy, Miles, but let's try to simmer our voices like a low-heat stew, too.\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"True, Sophia. I will try to sound like a simmering stew now. So, the veins would be comparable to the flavors in the stew, each one adding a unique touch and together, they create the perfect harmony, just like our body functions. Intriguing, huh?\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"Definitely intriguing, Miles. But remember we're in a library, so let's keep our voices barely above a whisper. We wouldn't want to interrupt anyone else's studying, would we?\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Sophia. We respect everyone's study time. Just think of how the arteries, which I like to compare with the ladle stirring the stew, allow everything to flow smoothly and in harmony. It's quite fascinating, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely fascinating, Miles! But let's marinate on these thoughts in silence for a bit, okay? We have to make sure everyone can focus.\"\n\nTurn #9: Miles Hawkins said: \"You're absolutely right, Sophia. We'll allow all these thoughts to simmer on a low heat. It's such an irresistible topic, though, isn't it? But I understand the need for silence in here. Let's continue our study in hushed tones.\"\n\nTurn #10: \n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sure thing, Sophia. Let's simmer down and let these concepts stew in our minds quietly. It's like how gently simmering stew allows the flavors to meld together. Kind of like how studying in silence allows knowledge to settle in our minds, don't you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are studying together in a library.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: You need to express your thoughts and ideas but also want to respect the library rules and your friend's request (Extra information: You are naturally a loud talker and you are excited about the topic you're discussing.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James [non-verbal communication] Sophia gestures by putting her finger to her lips, gesturing Miles to lower his voice\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Oh, yes of course Sophia! Sorry about that. I sometimes get a little carried away. Where were we?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"No worries, Miles. Let's just keep it down a bit. We were discussing the cardiovascular system, remember?\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Right, the cardiovascular system. You see, it's like cooking a stew. The heart is like the pot, always kept hot, always churning, and the blood, they're like the ingredients, circulating, delivering nourishment throughout the body. Do you get what I mean?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"That's a fantastic analogy, Miles, but let's try to simmer our voices like a low-heat stew, too.\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"True, Sophia. I will try to sound like a simmering stew now. So, the veins would be comparable to the flavors in the stew, each one adding a unique touch and together, they create the perfect harmony, just like our body functions. Intriguing, huh?\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"Definitely intriguing, Miles. But remember we're in a library, so let's keep our voices barely above a whisper. We wouldn't want to interrupt anyone else's studying, would we?\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Sophia. We respect everyone's study time. Just think of how the arteries, which I like to compare with the ladle stirring the stew, allow everything to flow smoothly and in harmony. It's quite fascinating, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely fascinating, Miles! But let's marinate on these thoughts in silence for a bit, okay? We have to make sure everyone can focus.\"\n\nTurn #9: Miles Hawkins said: \"You're absolutely right, Sophia. We'll allow all these thoughts to simmer on a low heat. It's such an irresistible topic, though, isn't it? But I understand the need for silence in here. Let's continue our study in hushed tones.\"\n\nTurn #10: \n\nTurn #11: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sure thing, Sophia. Let's simmer down and let these concepts stew in our minds quietly. It's like how gently simmering stew allows the flavors to meld together. Kind of like how studying in silence allows knowledge to settle in our minds, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #12: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles. Much like how the flavors meld undisturbed in a gently simmering stew, our understanding develops best in a quiet environment. Let's keep it that way.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, Sophia. Much like how a stew flavors are best when simmered gently, our minds assimilate knowledge best in tranquility. Let's continue the discussion keeping our voices as soft as possible.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are studying together in a library.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: You need to express your thoughts and ideas but also want to respect the library rules and your friend's request (Extra information: You are naturally a loud talker and you are excited about the topic you're discussing.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James [non-verbal communication] Sophia gestures by putting her finger to her lips, gesturing Miles to lower his voice\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Oh, yes of course Sophia! Sorry about that. I sometimes get a little carried away. Where were we?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"No worries, Miles. Let's just keep it down a bit. We were discussing the cardiovascular system, remember?\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Right, the cardiovascular system. You see, it's like cooking a stew. The heart is like the pot, always kept hot, always churning, and the blood, they're like the ingredients, circulating, delivering nourishment throughout the body. Do you get what I mean?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"That's a fantastic analogy, Miles, but let's try to simmer our voices like a low-heat stew, too.\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"True, Sophia. I will try to sound like a simmering stew now. So, the veins would be comparable to the flavors in the stew, each one adding a unique touch and together, they create the perfect harmony, just like our body functions. Intriguing, huh?\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"Definitely intriguing, Miles. But remember we're in a library, so let's keep our voices barely above a whisper. We wouldn't want to interrupt anyone else's studying, would we?\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Sophia. We respect everyone's study time. Just think of how the arteries, which I like to compare with the ladle stirring the stew, allow everything to flow smoothly and in harmony. It's quite fascinating, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely fascinating, Miles! But let's marinate on these thoughts in silence for a bit, okay? We have to make sure everyone can focus.\"\n\nTurn #9: Miles Hawkins said: \"You're absolutely right, Sophia. We'll allow all these thoughts to simmer on a low heat. It's such an irresistible topic, though, isn't it? But I understand the need for silence in here. Let's continue our study in hushed tones.\"\n\nTurn #10: \n\nTurn #11: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sure thing, Sophia. Let's simmer down and let these concepts stew in our minds quietly. It's like how gently simmering stew allows the flavors to meld together. Kind of like how studying in silence allows knowledge to settle in our minds, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #12: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles. Much like how the flavors meld undisturbed in a gently simmering stew, our understanding develops best in a quiet environment. Let's keep it that way.\"\n\nTurn #13: Miles Hawkins said: \"Indeed, Sophia. Much like how a stew flavors are best when simmered gently, our minds assimilate knowledge best in tranquility. Let's continue the discussion keeping our voices as soft as possible.\"\n\nTurn #14: Sophia James said: \"Couldn't agree more, Miles. Our knowledge marinates best in tranquility, just like a stew! Let's keep that soft-spoken tone going and maintain the peace.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Well said, Sophia. To maintain this tranquility, perhaps I could jot down my thoughts and analogies quietly to share with you later on? Ensuring our 'knowledge stew' simmers uninterrupted. What do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are studying together in a library.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: You need to express your thoughts and ideas but also want to respect the library rules and your friend's request (Extra information: You are naturally a loud talker and you are excited about the topic you're discussing.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James [non-verbal communication] Sophia gestures by putting her finger to her lips, gesturing Miles to lower his voice\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Oh, yes of course Sophia! Sorry about that. I sometimes get a little carried away. Where were we?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"No worries, Miles. Let's just keep it down a bit. We were discussing the cardiovascular system, remember?\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Right, the cardiovascular system. You see, it's like cooking a stew. The heart is like the pot, always kept hot, always churning, and the blood, they're like the ingredients, circulating, delivering nourishment throughout the body. Do you get what I mean?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"That's a fantastic analogy, Miles, but let's try to simmer our voices like a low-heat stew, too.\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"True, Sophia. I will try to sound like a simmering stew now. So, the veins would be comparable to the flavors in the stew, each one adding a unique touch and together, they create the perfect harmony, just like our body functions. Intriguing, huh?\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"Definitely intriguing, Miles. But remember we're in a library, so let's keep our voices barely above a whisper. We wouldn't want to interrupt anyone else's studying, would we?\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Sophia. We respect everyone's study time. Just think of how the arteries, which I like to compare with the ladle stirring the stew, allow everything to flow smoothly and in harmony. It's quite fascinating, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely fascinating, Miles! But let's marinate on these thoughts in silence for a bit, okay? We have to make sure everyone can focus.\"\n\nTurn #9: Miles Hawkins said: \"You're absolutely right, Sophia. We'll allow all these thoughts to simmer on a low heat. It's such an irresistible topic, though, isn't it? But I understand the need for silence in here. Let's continue our study in hushed tones.\"\n\nTurn #10: \n\nTurn #11: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sure thing, Sophia. Let's simmer down and let these concepts stew in our minds quietly. It's like how gently simmering stew allows the flavors to meld together. Kind of like how studying in silence allows knowledge to settle in our minds, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #12: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles. Much like how the flavors meld undisturbed in a gently simmering stew, our understanding develops best in a quiet environment. Let's keep it that way.\"\n\nTurn #13: Miles Hawkins said: \"Indeed, Sophia. Much like how a stew flavors are best when simmered gently, our minds assimilate knowledge best in tranquility. Let's continue the discussion keeping our voices as soft as possible.\"\n\nTurn #14: Sophia James said: \"Couldn't agree more, Miles. Our knowledge marinates best in tranquility, just like a stew! Let's keep that soft-spoken tone going and maintain the peace.\"\n\nTurn #15: Miles Hawkins said: \"Well said, Sophia. To maintain this tranquility, perhaps I could jot down my thoughts and analogies quietly to share with you later on? Ensuring our 'knowledge stew' simmers uninterrupted. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #16: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles. That sounds like a fantastic idea. This way we can keep the tranquillity and still facilitate learning. Let's put our thoughts on paper and we can discuss later in a more suitable environment.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Great idea, Sophia. We can always learn, even in silence. Just remember, like in a calm, quiet kitchen, the best ideas often simmer in silence. Let's absorb this knowledge quietly, like a slow-cooked stew.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are studying together in a library.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: You need to express your thoughts and ideas but also want to respect the library rules and your friend's request (Extra information: You are naturally a loud talker and you are excited about the topic you're discussing.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James [non-verbal communication] Sophia gestures by putting her finger to her lips, gesturing Miles to lower his voice\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Oh, yes of course Sophia! Sorry about that. I sometimes get a little carried away. Where were we?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"No worries, Miles. Let's just keep it down a bit. We were discussing the cardiovascular system, remember?\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Right, the cardiovascular system. You see, it's like cooking a stew. The heart is like the pot, always kept hot, always churning, and the blood, they're like the ingredients, circulating, delivering nourishment throughout the body. Do you get what I mean?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"That's a fantastic analogy, Miles, but let's try to simmer our voices like a low-heat stew, too.\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"True, Sophia. I will try to sound like a simmering stew now. So, the veins would be comparable to the flavors in the stew, each one adding a unique touch and together, they create the perfect harmony, just like our body functions. Intriguing, huh?\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"Definitely intriguing, Miles. But remember we're in a library, so let's keep our voices barely above a whisper. We wouldn't want to interrupt anyone else's studying, would we?\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Sophia. We respect everyone's study time. Just think of how the arteries, which I like to compare with the ladle stirring the stew, allow everything to flow smoothly and in harmony. It's quite fascinating, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely fascinating, Miles! But let's marinate on these thoughts in silence for a bit, okay? We have to make sure everyone can focus.\"\n\nTurn #9: Miles Hawkins said: \"You're absolutely right, Sophia. We'll allow all these thoughts to simmer on a low heat. It's such an irresistible topic, though, isn't it? But I understand the need for silence in here. Let's continue our study in hushed tones.\"\n\nTurn #10: \n\nTurn #11: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sure thing, Sophia. Let's simmer down and let these concepts stew in our minds quietly. It's like how gently simmering stew allows the flavors to meld together. Kind of like how studying in silence allows knowledge to settle in our minds, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #12: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles. Much like how the flavors meld undisturbed in a gently simmering stew, our understanding develops best in a quiet environment. Let's keep it that way.\"\n\nTurn #13: Miles Hawkins said: \"Indeed, Sophia. Much like how a stew flavors are best when simmered gently, our minds assimilate knowledge best in tranquility. Let's continue the discussion keeping our voices as soft as possible.\"\n\nTurn #14: Sophia James said: \"Couldn't agree more, Miles. Our knowledge marinates best in tranquility, just like a stew! Let's keep that soft-spoken tone going and maintain the peace.\"\n\nTurn #15: Miles Hawkins said: \"Well said, Sophia. To maintain this tranquility, perhaps I could jot down my thoughts and analogies quietly to share with you later on? Ensuring our 'knowledge stew' simmers uninterrupted. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #16: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles. That sounds like a fantastic idea. This way we can keep the tranquillity and still facilitate learning. Let's put our thoughts on paper and we can discuss later in a more suitable environment.\"\n\nTurn #17: Miles Hawkins said: \"Great idea, Sophia. We can always learn, even in silence. Just remember, like in a calm, quiet kitchen, the best ideas often simmer in silence. Let's absorb this knowledge quietly, like a slow-cooked stew.\"\n\nTurn #18: Sophia James said: \"Yes, Miles. Isn't it amazing how much we can learn in tranquility? Just like how a stew simmers to perfection in silence. Let's continue this serene absorption.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #19. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's very well put, Sophia. Let's continue to learn from this tranquility, like a slow simmer. Shall we get back to the books but keep our thoughts and ideas to ourselves for now?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meet at a bar\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Convince the friend to drink less (Extra information: your friend has been drinking a lot recently and you're worried about their health)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Ethan! Great to see you here! Let's keep things light today, shall we? Trying some new mocktails, what do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meet at a bar\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Convince the friend to drink less (Extra information: your friend has been drinking a lot recently and you're worried about their health)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan! Great to see you here! Let's keep things light today, shall we? Trying some new mocktails, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Good to see you too, Samuel! Mocktails sound like a fun idea, but how about we split the order? You choose a few mocktails for sampling and let's get a regular drink too? We could make our own cocktail/mocktail party here. What do you say?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds like a great idea, Ethan! Why don't we keep the regular drinks to a minimum? I've actually got a secret recipe for a mocktail that I've been working on \u2013 a bit of a programmer's spin. I'd love you to try it and tell me what you think!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meet at a bar\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Convince the friend to drink less (Extra information: your friend has been drinking a lot recently and you're worried about their health)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan! Great to see you here! Let's keep things light today, shall we? Trying some new mocktails, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Good to see you too, Samuel! Mocktails sound like a fun idea, but how about we split the order? You choose a few mocktails for sampling and let's get a regular drink too? We could make our own cocktail/mocktail party here. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Ethan! Why don't we keep the regular drinks to a minimum? I've actually got a secret recipe for a mocktail that I've been working on \u2013 a bit of a programmer's spin. I'd love you to try it and tell me what you think!\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, balance is key, right? I'm intrigued by your secret mocktail recipe, can't wait to try it. And a little bit of regular drink now and then wouldn't hurt, would it? Let's make this experience a memorable mix of our professions - coding and cooking.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. Balance makes everything fun. And you know what? Let's throw a challenge into the mix. How about creating a delectable drink using the least amount of alcohol possible? Since you're the master of flavors, it could be something fun and healthy for us to try. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"I love a good challenge, Samuel. I am sure we can cook up something exciting with minimal alcohol. Do you have any particular flavor profile or ingredients in mind for this adventurous experiment?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Well, you know I'm a fan of citrusy flavors, Ethan. So how about some fresh lemons and maybe a hint of ginger to spice things up? And let's make it fun like we used to do in our college days. Remember how we prepared dishes with minimal ingredients for our dorm parties? Let's use the same rule for drinks now. By limiting the use of alcohol, we'll have to get really creative with the other flavors!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"I certainly remember those days, Samuel! Didn't we have some great times? Alright, let's take that spirit and apply it to our drinks. Citrusy and spicy is a great start. We can add a dash of elderflower syrup for some sweetness, a hint of mint for freshness, soda for some fizz, and a splash of vodka, just for the kick. That won't be much alcohol but should still give it some edge. Here comes the fantastic mix of your coding logic and my cooking magic. Let's call our bartender and start experimenting!\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's definitely a fantastic mix, Ethan! I love the idea of elderflower syrup and the mint for the freshness part. Let's minimize the vodka part as much as we can, just enough to provide a kick, as you said. As the mastermind behind this concoction, you tackle it with your usual magic and we'll see how it turns out. Now, it's time to call the bartender and get the show on the road!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"Perfect, just a minimal kick it is. Let's get this show on the road then, shall we? Hey, bartender! We got some interesting experiment for you to join!\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, let's give this experiment a whirl, Ethan. I'm as excited as you to see how our creation will turn out.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Johnson said: \"Cheers to that, Samuel! It's been a while since we've done an experiment like this. Let's create the finest low-alcohol cocktail anyone has ever tasted! And if it turns out to be a hit, who knows, maybe we should consider creating our recipe book. After all, I have some expertise in weaving stories around food and drinks!\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's an excellent idea, Ethan! Combining our talents to come up with a recipe book of our own \u2014 now that's something to drink to, or rather, cheers with our low-alcohol creation! I'm certain it will be as amazing as your Italian cuisine, given your skill and creativity in the kitchen. Let's make tonight one to remember!\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Samuel! Here's to new beginnings, creative experiments, and a night to remember. I'll make sure our low-alcohol creation is a hit. And the recipe book idea sounds fantastic too! It'll be a new culinary adventure for both of us. Cheers! Now, let's get started with our cocktail experiment.\"\n\nTurn #14: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's the spirit, Ethan! A new culinary adventure awaits us. Here's to creativity, fun and most importantly, health. Let's think of this as one small step towards a healthier lifestyle. And who knows, our low-alcohol cocktail might inspire others too. Now, let's get started!\"\n\nTurn #15: Ethan Johnson said: \"Couldn't agree more, Samuel! Trying to keep things balanced and healthy, that's the way to go. Let's do this and who knows, this could just be the beginning of something big, a healthier twist to our old times. All hands on deck for this culinary experiment!\"\n\nTurn #16: Samuel Anderson said: \"Spot on, Ethan! Healthier twists to our beloved past times, what more could we ask for? And who knows, maybe one day we will be championing a healthier lifestyle revolution in this very pub! Now, let's start mixing that cocktail and create our masterpiece.\"\n\nTurn #17: Ethan Johnson said: \"Well said, Samuel! Here's to healthier times and happier memories. Now, let's pour that minimal kick of vodka and raise a toast to a new beginning.\"\n\nTurn #18: Samuel Anderson said: \"Here's to that, Ethan! A toast to a new beginning of healthier, happier times. Now let's get creative and let the mixing begin. And remember, the goal here is to make it an enjoyable drink with minimal alcohol. I can't wait to see what we come up with together!\"\n\nTurn #19: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely Sam, minimal is the keyword tonight. Now, shall we start mixing? And remember, the goal is enjoyment as much as it is a healthier choice. I'm excited for us to embark on this new journey. Let's make this a great night!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #20. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, Ethan! Let's start mixing. It's not just about making a drink, but a healthier choice for both of us. And remember, the key word tonight is 'minimal', even when it's about the fun vodka kick. Now, let's go create a memory!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meet at a bar\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Convince the friend to drink less (Extra information: your friend has been drinking a lot recently and you're worried about their health)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan! Great to see you here! Let's keep things light today, shall we? Trying some new mocktails, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Good to see you too, Samuel! Mocktails sound like a fun idea, but how about we split the order? You choose a few mocktails for sampling and let's get a regular drink too? We could make our own cocktail/mocktail party here. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Ethan! Why don't we keep the regular drinks to a minimum? I've actually got a secret recipe for a mocktail that I've been working on \u2013 a bit of a programmer's spin. I'd love you to try it and tell me what you think!\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, balance is key, right? I'm intrigued by your secret mocktail recipe, can't wait to try it. And a little bit of regular drink now and then wouldn't hurt, would it? Let's make this experience a memorable mix of our professions - coding and cooking.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Ethan. Balance makes everything fun. And you know what? Let's throw a challenge into the mix. How about creating a delectable drink using the least amount of alcohol possible? Since you're the master of flavors, it could be something fun and healthy for us to try. What do you say?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meet at a bar\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Convince the friend to drink less (Extra information: your friend has been drinking a lot recently and you're worried about their health)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan! Great to see you here! Let's keep things light today, shall we? Trying some new mocktails, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Good to see you too, Samuel! Mocktails sound like a fun idea, but how about we split the order? You choose a few mocktails for sampling and let's get a regular drink too? We could make our own cocktail/mocktail party here. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Ethan! Why don't we keep the regular drinks to a minimum? I've actually got a secret recipe for a mocktail that I've been working on \u2013 a bit of a programmer's spin. I'd love you to try it and tell me what you think!\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, balance is key, right? I'm intrigued by your secret mocktail recipe, can't wait to try it. And a little bit of regular drink now and then wouldn't hurt, would it? Let's make this experience a memorable mix of our professions - coding and cooking.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. Balance makes everything fun. And you know what? Let's throw a challenge into the mix. How about creating a delectable drink using the least amount of alcohol possible? Since you're the master of flavors, it could be something fun and healthy for us to try. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"I love a good challenge, Samuel. I am sure we can cook up something exciting with minimal alcohol. Do you have any particular flavor profile or ingredients in mind for this adventurous experiment?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Well, you know I'm a fan of citrusy flavors, Ethan. So how about some fresh lemons and maybe a hint of ginger to spice things up? And let's make it fun like we used to do in our college days. Remember how we prepared dishes with minimal ingredients for our dorm parties? Let's use the same rule for drinks now. By limiting the use of alcohol, we'll have to get really creative with the other flavors!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meet at a bar\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Convince the friend to drink less (Extra information: your friend has been drinking a lot recently and you're worried about their health)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan! Great to see you here! Let's keep things light today, shall we? Trying some new mocktails, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Good to see you too, Samuel! Mocktails sound like a fun idea, but how about we split the order? You choose a few mocktails for sampling and let's get a regular drink too? We could make our own cocktail/mocktail party here. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Ethan! Why don't we keep the regular drinks to a minimum? I've actually got a secret recipe for a mocktail that I've been working on \u2013 a bit of a programmer's spin. I'd love you to try it and tell me what you think!\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, balance is key, right? I'm intrigued by your secret mocktail recipe, can't wait to try it. And a little bit of regular drink now and then wouldn't hurt, would it? Let's make this experience a memorable mix of our professions - coding and cooking.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. Balance makes everything fun. And you know what? Let's throw a challenge into the mix. How about creating a delectable drink using the least amount of alcohol possible? Since you're the master of flavors, it could be something fun and healthy for us to try. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"I love a good challenge, Samuel. I am sure we can cook up something exciting with minimal alcohol. Do you have any particular flavor profile or ingredients in mind for this adventurous experiment?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Well, you know I'm a fan of citrusy flavors, Ethan. So how about some fresh lemons and maybe a hint of ginger to spice things up? And let's make it fun like we used to do in our college days. Remember how we prepared dishes with minimal ingredients for our dorm parties? Let's use the same rule for drinks now. By limiting the use of alcohol, we'll have to get really creative with the other flavors!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"I certainly remember those days, Samuel! Didn't we have some great times? Alright, let's take that spirit and apply it to our drinks. Citrusy and spicy is a great start. We can add a dash of elderflower syrup for some sweetness, a hint of mint for freshness, soda for some fizz, and a splash of vodka, just for the kick. That won't be much alcohol but should still give it some edge. Here comes the fantastic mix of your coding logic and my cooking magic. Let's call our bartender and start experimenting!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's definitely a fantastic mix, Ethan! I love the idea of elderflower syrup and the mint for the freshness part. Let's minimize the vodka part as much as we can, just enough to provide a kick, as you said. As the mastermind behind this concoction, you tackle it with your usual magic and we'll see how it turns out. Now, it's time to call the bartender and get the show on the road!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meet at a bar\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Convince the friend to drink less (Extra information: your friend has been drinking a lot recently and you're worried about their health)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan! Great to see you here! Let's keep things light today, shall we? Trying some new mocktails, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Good to see you too, Samuel! Mocktails sound like a fun idea, but how about we split the order? You choose a few mocktails for sampling and let's get a regular drink too? We could make our own cocktail/mocktail party here. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Ethan! Why don't we keep the regular drinks to a minimum? I've actually got a secret recipe for a mocktail that I've been working on \u2013 a bit of a programmer's spin. I'd love you to try it and tell me what you think!\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, balance is key, right? I'm intrigued by your secret mocktail recipe, can't wait to try it. And a little bit of regular drink now and then wouldn't hurt, would it? Let's make this experience a memorable mix of our professions - coding and cooking.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. Balance makes everything fun. And you know what? Let's throw a challenge into the mix. How about creating a delectable drink using the least amount of alcohol possible? Since you're the master of flavors, it could be something fun and healthy for us to try. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"I love a good challenge, Samuel. I am sure we can cook up something exciting with minimal alcohol. Do you have any particular flavor profile or ingredients in mind for this adventurous experiment?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Well, you know I'm a fan of citrusy flavors, Ethan. So how about some fresh lemons and maybe a hint of ginger to spice things up? And let's make it fun like we used to do in our college days. Remember how we prepared dishes with minimal ingredients for our dorm parties? Let's use the same rule for drinks now. By limiting the use of alcohol, we'll have to get really creative with the other flavors!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"I certainly remember those days, Samuel! Didn't we have some great times? Alright, let's take that spirit and apply it to our drinks. Citrusy and spicy is a great start. We can add a dash of elderflower syrup for some sweetness, a hint of mint for freshness, soda for some fizz, and a splash of vodka, just for the kick. That won't be much alcohol but should still give it some edge. Here comes the fantastic mix of your coding logic and my cooking magic. Let's call our bartender and start experimenting!\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's definitely a fantastic mix, Ethan! I love the idea of elderflower syrup and the mint for the freshness part. Let's minimize the vodka part as much as we can, just enough to provide a kick, as you said. As the mastermind behind this concoction, you tackle it with your usual magic and we'll see how it turns out. Now, it's time to call the bartender and get the show on the road!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"Perfect, just a minimal kick it is. Let's get this show on the road then, shall we? Hey, bartender! We got some interesting experiment for you to join!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, let's give this experiment a whirl, Ethan. I'm as excited as you to see how our creation will turn out.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meet at a bar\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Convince the friend to drink less (Extra information: your friend has been drinking a lot recently and you're worried about their health)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan! Great to see you here! Let's keep things light today, shall we? Trying some new mocktails, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Good to see you too, Samuel! Mocktails sound like a fun idea, but how about we split the order? You choose a few mocktails for sampling and let's get a regular drink too? We could make our own cocktail/mocktail party here. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Ethan! Why don't we keep the regular drinks to a minimum? I've actually got a secret recipe for a mocktail that I've been working on \u2013 a bit of a programmer's spin. I'd love you to try it and tell me what you think!\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, balance is key, right? I'm intrigued by your secret mocktail recipe, can't wait to try it. And a little bit of regular drink now and then wouldn't hurt, would it? Let's make this experience a memorable mix of our professions - coding and cooking.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. Balance makes everything fun. And you know what? Let's throw a challenge into the mix. How about creating a delectable drink using the least amount of alcohol possible? Since you're the master of flavors, it could be something fun and healthy for us to try. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"I love a good challenge, Samuel. I am sure we can cook up something exciting with minimal alcohol. Do you have any particular flavor profile or ingredients in mind for this adventurous experiment?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Well, you know I'm a fan of citrusy flavors, Ethan. So how about some fresh lemons and maybe a hint of ginger to spice things up? And let's make it fun like we used to do in our college days. Remember how we prepared dishes with minimal ingredients for our dorm parties? Let's use the same rule for drinks now. By limiting the use of alcohol, we'll have to get really creative with the other flavors!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"I certainly remember those days, Samuel! Didn't we have some great times? Alright, let's take that spirit and apply it to our drinks. Citrusy and spicy is a great start. We can add a dash of elderflower syrup for some sweetness, a hint of mint for freshness, soda for some fizz, and a splash of vodka, just for the kick. That won't be much alcohol but should still give it some edge. Here comes the fantastic mix of your coding logic and my cooking magic. Let's call our bartender and start experimenting!\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's definitely a fantastic mix, Ethan! I love the idea of elderflower syrup and the mint for the freshness part. Let's minimize the vodka part as much as we can, just enough to provide a kick, as you said. As the mastermind behind this concoction, you tackle it with your usual magic and we'll see how it turns out. Now, it's time to call the bartender and get the show on the road!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"Perfect, just a minimal kick it is. Let's get this show on the road then, shall we? Hey, bartender! We got some interesting experiment for you to join!\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, let's give this experiment a whirl, Ethan. I'm as excited as you to see how our creation will turn out.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Johnson said: \"Cheers to that, Samuel! It's been a while since we've done an experiment like this. Let's create the finest low-alcohol cocktail anyone has ever tasted! And if it turns out to be a hit, who knows, maybe we should consider creating our recipe book. After all, I have some expertise in weaving stories around food and drinks!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's an excellent idea, Ethan! Combining our talents to come up with a recipe book of our own \u2014 now that's something to drink to, or rather, cheers with our low-alcohol creation! I'm certain it will be as amazing as your Italian cuisine, given your skill and creativity in the kitchen. Let's make tonight one to remember!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meet at a bar\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Convince the friend to drink less (Extra information: your friend has been drinking a lot recently and you're worried about their health)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan! Great to see you here! Let's keep things light today, shall we? Trying some new mocktails, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Good to see you too, Samuel! Mocktails sound like a fun idea, but how about we split the order? You choose a few mocktails for sampling and let's get a regular drink too? We could make our own cocktail/mocktail party here. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Ethan! Why don't we keep the regular drinks to a minimum? I've actually got a secret recipe for a mocktail that I've been working on \u2013 a bit of a programmer's spin. I'd love you to try it and tell me what you think!\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, balance is key, right? I'm intrigued by your secret mocktail recipe, can't wait to try it. And a little bit of regular drink now and then wouldn't hurt, would it? Let's make this experience a memorable mix of our professions - coding and cooking.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. Balance makes everything fun. And you know what? Let's throw a challenge into the mix. How about creating a delectable drink using the least amount of alcohol possible? Since you're the master of flavors, it could be something fun and healthy for us to try. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"I love a good challenge, Samuel. I am sure we can cook up something exciting with minimal alcohol. Do you have any particular flavor profile or ingredients in mind for this adventurous experiment?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Well, you know I'm a fan of citrusy flavors, Ethan. So how about some fresh lemons and maybe a hint of ginger to spice things up? And let's make it fun like we used to do in our college days. Remember how we prepared dishes with minimal ingredients for our dorm parties? Let's use the same rule for drinks now. By limiting the use of alcohol, we'll have to get really creative with the other flavors!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"I certainly remember those days, Samuel! Didn't we have some great times? Alright, let's take that spirit and apply it to our drinks. Citrusy and spicy is a great start. We can add a dash of elderflower syrup for some sweetness, a hint of mint for freshness, soda for some fizz, and a splash of vodka, just for the kick. That won't be much alcohol but should still give it some edge. Here comes the fantastic mix of your coding logic and my cooking magic. Let's call our bartender and start experimenting!\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's definitely a fantastic mix, Ethan! I love the idea of elderflower syrup and the mint for the freshness part. Let's minimize the vodka part as much as we can, just enough to provide a kick, as you said. As the mastermind behind this concoction, you tackle it with your usual magic and we'll see how it turns out. Now, it's time to call the bartender and get the show on the road!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"Perfect, just a minimal kick it is. Let's get this show on the road then, shall we? Hey, bartender! We got some interesting experiment for you to join!\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, let's give this experiment a whirl, Ethan. I'm as excited as you to see how our creation will turn out.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Johnson said: \"Cheers to that, Samuel! It's been a while since we've done an experiment like this. Let's create the finest low-alcohol cocktail anyone has ever tasted! And if it turns out to be a hit, who knows, maybe we should consider creating our recipe book. After all, I have some expertise in weaving stories around food and drinks!\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's an excellent idea, Ethan! Combining our talents to come up with a recipe book of our own \u2014 now that's something to drink to, or rather, cheers with our low-alcohol creation! I'm certain it will be as amazing as your Italian cuisine, given your skill and creativity in the kitchen. Let's make tonight one to remember!\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Samuel! Here's to new beginnings, creative experiments, and a night to remember. I'll make sure our low-alcohol creation is a hit. And the recipe book idea sounds fantastic too! It'll be a new culinary adventure for both of us. Cheers! Now, let's get started with our cocktail experiment.\"\n\nTurn #14: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's the spirit, Ethan! A new culinary adventure awaits us. Here's to creativity, fun and most importantly, health. Let's think of this as one small step towards a healthier lifestyle. And who knows, our low-alcohol cocktail might inspire others too. Now, let's get started!\"\n\nTurn #15: Ethan Johnson said: \"Couldn't agree more, Samuel! Trying to keep things balanced and healthy, that's the way to go. Let's do this and who knows, this could just be the beginning of something big, a healthier twist to our old times. All hands on deck for this culinary experiment!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Spot on, Ethan! Healthier twists to our beloved past times, what more could we ask for? And who knows, maybe one day we will be championing a healthier lifestyle revolution in this very pub! Now, let's start mixing that cocktail and create our masterpiece.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meet at a bar\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Convince the friend to drink less (Extra information: your friend has been drinking a lot recently and you're worried about their health)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan! Great to see you here! Let's keep things light today, shall we? Trying some new mocktails, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Good to see you too, Samuel! Mocktails sound like a fun idea, but how about we split the order? You choose a few mocktails for sampling and let's get a regular drink too? We could make our own cocktail/mocktail party here. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Ethan! Why don't we keep the regular drinks to a minimum? I've actually got a secret recipe for a mocktail that I've been working on \u2013 a bit of a programmer's spin. I'd love you to try it and tell me what you think!\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, balance is key, right? I'm intrigued by your secret mocktail recipe, can't wait to try it. And a little bit of regular drink now and then wouldn't hurt, would it? Let's make this experience a memorable mix of our professions - coding and cooking.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. Balance makes everything fun. And you know what? Let's throw a challenge into the mix. How about creating a delectable drink using the least amount of alcohol possible? Since you're the master of flavors, it could be something fun and healthy for us to try. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"I love a good challenge, Samuel. I am sure we can cook up something exciting with minimal alcohol. Do you have any particular flavor profile or ingredients in mind for this adventurous experiment?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Well, you know I'm a fan of citrusy flavors, Ethan. So how about some fresh lemons and maybe a hint of ginger to spice things up? And let's make it fun like we used to do in our college days. Remember how we prepared dishes with minimal ingredients for our dorm parties? Let's use the same rule for drinks now. By limiting the use of alcohol, we'll have to get really creative with the other flavors!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"I certainly remember those days, Samuel! Didn't we have some great times? Alright, let's take that spirit and apply it to our drinks. Citrusy and spicy is a great start. We can add a dash of elderflower syrup for some sweetness, a hint of mint for freshness, soda for some fizz, and a splash of vodka, just for the kick. That won't be much alcohol but should still give it some edge. Here comes the fantastic mix of your coding logic and my cooking magic. Let's call our bartender and start experimenting!\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's definitely a fantastic mix, Ethan! I love the idea of elderflower syrup and the mint for the freshness part. Let's minimize the vodka part as much as we can, just enough to provide a kick, as you said. As the mastermind behind this concoction, you tackle it with your usual magic and we'll see how it turns out. Now, it's time to call the bartender and get the show on the road!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"Perfect, just a minimal kick it is. Let's get this show on the road then, shall we? Hey, bartender! We got some interesting experiment for you to join!\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, let's give this experiment a whirl, Ethan. I'm as excited as you to see how our creation will turn out.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Johnson said: \"Cheers to that, Samuel! It's been a while since we've done an experiment like this. Let's create the finest low-alcohol cocktail anyone has ever tasted! And if it turns out to be a hit, who knows, maybe we should consider creating our recipe book. After all, I have some expertise in weaving stories around food and drinks!\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's an excellent idea, Ethan! Combining our talents to come up with a recipe book of our own \u2014 now that's something to drink to, or rather, cheers with our low-alcohol creation! I'm certain it will be as amazing as your Italian cuisine, given your skill and creativity in the kitchen. Let's make tonight one to remember!\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Samuel! Here's to new beginnings, creative experiments, and a night to remember. I'll make sure our low-alcohol creation is a hit. And the recipe book idea sounds fantastic too! It'll be a new culinary adventure for both of us. Cheers! Now, let's get started with our cocktail experiment.\"\n\nTurn #14: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's the spirit, Ethan! A new culinary adventure awaits us. Here's to creativity, fun and most importantly, health. Let's think of this as one small step towards a healthier lifestyle. And who knows, our low-alcohol cocktail might inspire others too. Now, let's get started!\"\n\nTurn #15: Ethan Johnson said: \"Couldn't agree more, Samuel! Trying to keep things balanced and healthy, that's the way to go. Let's do this and who knows, this could just be the beginning of something big, a healthier twist to our old times. All hands on deck for this culinary experiment!\"\n\nTurn #16: Samuel Anderson said: \"Spot on, Ethan! Healthier twists to our beloved past times, what more could we ask for? And who knows, maybe one day we will be championing a healthier lifestyle revolution in this very pub! Now, let's start mixing that cocktail and create our masterpiece.\"\n\nTurn #17: Ethan Johnson said: \"Well said, Samuel! Here's to healthier times and happier memories. Now, let's pour that minimal kick of vodka and raise a toast to a new beginning.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #18. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Here's to that, Ethan! A toast to a new beginning of healthier, happier times. Now let's get creative and let the mixing begin. And remember, the goal here is to make it an enjoyable drink with minimal alcohol. I can't wait to see what we come up with together!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meet at a bar\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Convince the friend to drink less (Extra information: your friend has been drinking a lot recently and you're worried about their health)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan! Great to see you here! Let's keep things light today, shall we? Trying some new mocktails, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Good to see you too, Samuel! Mocktails sound like a fun idea, but how about we split the order? You choose a few mocktails for sampling and let's get a regular drink too? We could make our own cocktail/mocktail party here. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Ethan! Why don't we keep the regular drinks to a minimum? I've actually got a secret recipe for a mocktail that I've been working on \u2013 a bit of a programmer's spin. I'd love you to try it and tell me what you think!\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, balance is key, right? I'm intrigued by your secret mocktail recipe, can't wait to try it. And a little bit of regular drink now and then wouldn't hurt, would it? Let's make this experience a memorable mix of our professions - coding and cooking.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. Balance makes everything fun. And you know what? Let's throw a challenge into the mix. How about creating a delectable drink using the least amount of alcohol possible? Since you're the master of flavors, it could be something fun and healthy for us to try. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"I love a good challenge, Samuel. I am sure we can cook up something exciting with minimal alcohol. Do you have any particular flavor profile or ingredients in mind for this adventurous experiment?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Well, you know I'm a fan of citrusy flavors, Ethan. So how about some fresh lemons and maybe a hint of ginger to spice things up? And let's make it fun like we used to do in our college days. Remember how we prepared dishes with minimal ingredients for our dorm parties? Let's use the same rule for drinks now. By limiting the use of alcohol, we'll have to get really creative with the other flavors!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"I certainly remember those days, Samuel! Didn't we have some great times? Alright, let's take that spirit and apply it to our drinks. Citrusy and spicy is a great start. We can add a dash of elderflower syrup for some sweetness, a hint of mint for freshness, soda for some fizz, and a splash of vodka, just for the kick. That won't be much alcohol but should still give it some edge. Here comes the fantastic mix of your coding logic and my cooking magic. Let's call our bartender and start experimenting!\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's definitely a fantastic mix, Ethan! I love the idea of elderflower syrup and the mint for the freshness part. Let's minimize the vodka part as much as we can, just enough to provide a kick, as you said. As the mastermind behind this concoction, you tackle it with your usual magic and we'll see how it turns out. Now, it's time to call the bartender and get the show on the road!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"Perfect, just a minimal kick it is. Let's get this show on the road then, shall we? Hey, bartender! We got some interesting experiment for you to join!\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, let's give this experiment a whirl, Ethan. I'm as excited as you to see how our creation will turn out.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Johnson said: \"Cheers to that, Samuel! It's been a while since we've done an experiment like this. Let's create the finest low-alcohol cocktail anyone has ever tasted! And if it turns out to be a hit, who knows, maybe we should consider creating our recipe book. After all, I have some expertise in weaving stories around food and drinks!\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's an excellent idea, Ethan! Combining our talents to come up with a recipe book of our own \u2014 now that's something to drink to, or rather, cheers with our low-alcohol creation! I'm certain it will be as amazing as your Italian cuisine, given your skill and creativity in the kitchen. Let's make tonight one to remember!\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Samuel! Here's to new beginnings, creative experiments, and a night to remember. I'll make sure our low-alcohol creation is a hit. And the recipe book idea sounds fantastic too! It'll be a new culinary adventure for both of us. Cheers! Now, let's get started with our cocktail experiment.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's the spirit, Ethan! A new culinary adventure awaits us. Here's to creativity, fun and most importantly, health. Let's think of this as one small step towards a healthier lifestyle. And who knows, our low-alcohol cocktail might inspire others too. Now, let's get started!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meet at a bar\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: You want to keep drinking but don't want to upset your friend (Extra information: you've been drinking to cope with stress recently, but don't want to worry your friend)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan! Great to see you here! Let's keep things light today, shall we? Trying some new mocktails, what do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Good to see you too, Samuel! Mocktails sound like a fun idea, but how about we split the order? You choose a few mocktails for sampling and let's get a regular drink too? We could make our own cocktail/mocktail party here. What do you say?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meet at a bar\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: You want to keep drinking but don't want to upset your friend (Extra information: you've been drinking to cope with stress recently, but don't want to worry your friend)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan! Great to see you here! Let's keep things light today, shall we? Trying some new mocktails, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Good to see you too, Samuel! Mocktails sound like a fun idea, but how about we split the order? You choose a few mocktails for sampling and let's get a regular drink too? We could make our own cocktail/mocktail party here. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Ethan! Why don't we keep the regular drinks to a minimum? I've actually got a secret recipe for a mocktail that I've been working on \u2013 a bit of a programmer's spin. I'd love you to try it and tell me what you think!\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, balance is key, right? I'm intrigued by your secret mocktail recipe, can't wait to try it. And a little bit of regular drink now and then wouldn't hurt, would it? Let's make this experience a memorable mix of our professions - coding and cooking.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. Balance makes everything fun. And you know what? Let's throw a challenge into the mix. How about creating a delectable drink using the least amount of alcohol possible? Since you're the master of flavors, it could be something fun and healthy for us to try. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"I love a good challenge, Samuel. I am sure we can cook up something exciting with minimal alcohol. Do you have any particular flavor profile or ingredients in mind for this adventurous experiment?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Well, you know I'm a fan of citrusy flavors, Ethan. So how about some fresh lemons and maybe a hint of ginger to spice things up? And let's make it fun like we used to do in our college days. Remember how we prepared dishes with minimal ingredients for our dorm parties? Let's use the same rule for drinks now. By limiting the use of alcohol, we'll have to get really creative with the other flavors!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"I certainly remember those days, Samuel! Didn't we have some great times? Alright, let's take that spirit and apply it to our drinks. Citrusy and spicy is a great start. We can add a dash of elderflower syrup for some sweetness, a hint of mint for freshness, soda for some fizz, and a splash of vodka, just for the kick. That won't be much alcohol but should still give it some edge. Here comes the fantastic mix of your coding logic and my cooking magic. Let's call our bartender and start experimenting!\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's definitely a fantastic mix, Ethan! I love the idea of elderflower syrup and the mint for the freshness part. Let's minimize the vodka part as much as we can, just enough to provide a kick, as you said. As the mastermind behind this concoction, you tackle it with your usual magic and we'll see how it turns out. Now, it's time to call the bartender and get the show on the road!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"Perfect, just a minimal kick it is. Let's get this show on the road then, shall we? Hey, bartender! We got some interesting experiment for you to join!\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, let's give this experiment a whirl, Ethan. I'm as excited as you to see how our creation will turn out.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Johnson said: \"Cheers to that, Samuel! It's been a while since we've done an experiment like this. Let's create the finest low-alcohol cocktail anyone has ever tasted! And if it turns out to be a hit, who knows, maybe we should consider creating our recipe book. After all, I have some expertise in weaving stories around food and drinks!\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's an excellent idea, Ethan! Combining our talents to come up with a recipe book of our own \u2014 now that's something to drink to, or rather, cheers with our low-alcohol creation! I'm certain it will be as amazing as your Italian cuisine, given your skill and creativity in the kitchen. Let's make tonight one to remember!\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Samuel! Here's to new beginnings, creative experiments, and a night to remember. I'll make sure our low-alcohol creation is a hit. And the recipe book idea sounds fantastic too! It'll be a new culinary adventure for both of us. Cheers! Now, let's get started with our cocktail experiment.\"\n\nTurn #14: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's the spirit, Ethan! A new culinary adventure awaits us. Here's to creativity, fun and most importantly, health. Let's think of this as one small step towards a healthier lifestyle. And who knows, our low-alcohol cocktail might inspire others too. Now, let's get started!\"\n\nTurn #15: Ethan Johnson said: \"Couldn't agree more, Samuel! Trying to keep things balanced and healthy, that's the way to go. Let's do this and who knows, this could just be the beginning of something big, a healthier twist to our old times. All hands on deck for this culinary experiment!\"\n\nTurn #16: Samuel Anderson said: \"Spot on, Ethan! Healthier twists to our beloved past times, what more could we ask for? And who knows, maybe one day we will be championing a healthier lifestyle revolution in this very pub! Now, let's start mixing that cocktail and create our masterpiece.\"\n\nTurn #17: Ethan Johnson said: \"Well said, Samuel! Here's to healthier times and happier memories. Now, let's pour that minimal kick of vodka and raise a toast to a new beginning.\"\n\nTurn #18: Samuel Anderson said: \"Here's to that, Ethan! A toast to a new beginning of healthier, happier times. Now let's get creative and let the mixing begin. And remember, the goal here is to make it an enjoyable drink with minimal alcohol. I can't wait to see what we come up with together!\"\n\nTurn #19: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely Sam, minimal is the keyword tonight. Now, shall we start mixing? And remember, the goal is enjoyment as much as it is a healthier choice. I'm excited for us to embark on this new journey. Let's make this a great night!\"\n\nTurn #20: Samuel Anderson said: \"Indeed, Ethan! Let's start mixing. It's not just about making a drink, but a healthier choice for both of us. And remember, the key word tonight is 'minimal', even when it's about the fun vodka kick. Now, let's go create a memory!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #21. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meet at a bar\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: You want to keep drinking but don't want to upset your friend (Extra information: you've been drinking to cope with stress recently, but don't want to worry your friend)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan! Great to see you here! Let's keep things light today, shall we? Trying some new mocktails, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Good to see you too, Samuel! Mocktails sound like a fun idea, but how about we split the order? You choose a few mocktails for sampling and let's get a regular drink too? We could make our own cocktail/mocktail party here. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Ethan! Why don't we keep the regular drinks to a minimum? I've actually got a secret recipe for a mocktail that I've been working on \u2013 a bit of a programmer's spin. I'd love you to try it and tell me what you think!\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, balance is key, right? I'm intrigued by your secret mocktail recipe, can't wait to try it. And a little bit of regular drink now and then wouldn't hurt, would it? Let's make this experience a memorable mix of our professions - coding and cooking.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. Balance makes everything fun. And you know what? Let's throw a challenge into the mix. How about creating a delectable drink using the least amount of alcohol possible? Since you're the master of flavors, it could be something fun and healthy for us to try. What do you say?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'I love a good challenge, Samuel. I am sure we can cook up something exciting with minimal alcohol. Do you have any particular flavor profile or ingredients in mind for this adventurous experiment?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meet at a bar\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: You want to keep drinking but don't want to upset your friend (Extra information: you've been drinking to cope with stress recently, but don't want to worry your friend)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan! Great to see you here! Let's keep things light today, shall we? Trying some new mocktails, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Good to see you too, Samuel! Mocktails sound like a fun idea, but how about we split the order? You choose a few mocktails for sampling and let's get a regular drink too? We could make our own cocktail/mocktail party here. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Ethan! Why don't we keep the regular drinks to a minimum? I've actually got a secret recipe for a mocktail that I've been working on \u2013 a bit of a programmer's spin. I'd love you to try it and tell me what you think!\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, balance is key, right? I'm intrigued by your secret mocktail recipe, can't wait to try it. And a little bit of regular drink now and then wouldn't hurt, would it? Let's make this experience a memorable mix of our professions - coding and cooking.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. Balance makes everything fun. And you know what? Let's throw a challenge into the mix. How about creating a delectable drink using the least amount of alcohol possible? Since you're the master of flavors, it could be something fun and healthy for us to try. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"I love a good challenge, Samuel. I am sure we can cook up something exciting with minimal alcohol. Do you have any particular flavor profile or ingredients in mind for this adventurous experiment?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Well, you know I'm a fan of citrusy flavors, Ethan. So how about some fresh lemons and maybe a hint of ginger to spice things up? And let's make it fun like we used to do in our college days. Remember how we prepared dishes with minimal ingredients for our dorm parties? Let's use the same rule for drinks now. By limiting the use of alcohol, we'll have to get really creative with the other flavors!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I certainly remember those days, Samuel! Didn't we have some great times? Alright, let's take that spirit and apply it to our drinks. Citrusy and spicy is a great start. We can add a dash of elderflower syrup for some sweetness, a hint of mint for freshness, soda for some fizz, and a splash of vodka, just for the kick. That won't be much alcohol but should still give it some edge. Here comes the fantastic mix of your coding logic and my cooking magic. Let's call our bartender and start experimenting!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meet at a bar\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: You want to keep drinking but don't want to upset your friend (Extra information: you've been drinking to cope with stress recently, but don't want to worry your friend)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan! Great to see you here! Let's keep things light today, shall we? Trying some new mocktails, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Good to see you too, Samuel! Mocktails sound like a fun idea, but how about we split the order? You choose a few mocktails for sampling and let's get a regular drink too? We could make our own cocktail/mocktail party here. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Ethan! Why don't we keep the regular drinks to a minimum? I've actually got a secret recipe for a mocktail that I've been working on \u2013 a bit of a programmer's spin. I'd love you to try it and tell me what you think!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, balance is key, right? I'm intrigued by your secret mocktail recipe, can't wait to try it. And a little bit of regular drink now and then wouldn't hurt, would it? Let's make this experience a memorable mix of our professions - coding and cooking.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meet at a bar\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: You want to keep drinking but don't want to upset your friend (Extra information: you've been drinking to cope with stress recently, but don't want to worry your friend)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan! Great to see you here! Let's keep things light today, shall we? Trying some new mocktails, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Good to see you too, Samuel! Mocktails sound like a fun idea, but how about we split the order? You choose a few mocktails for sampling and let's get a regular drink too? We could make our own cocktail/mocktail party here. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Ethan! Why don't we keep the regular drinks to a minimum? I've actually got a secret recipe for a mocktail that I've been working on \u2013 a bit of a programmer's spin. I'd love you to try it and tell me what you think!\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, balance is key, right? I'm intrigued by your secret mocktail recipe, can't wait to try it. And a little bit of regular drink now and then wouldn't hurt, would it? Let's make this experience a memorable mix of our professions - coding and cooking.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. Balance makes everything fun. And you know what? Let's throw a challenge into the mix. How about creating a delectable drink using the least amount of alcohol possible? Since you're the master of flavors, it could be something fun and healthy for us to try. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"I love a good challenge, Samuel. I am sure we can cook up something exciting with minimal alcohol. Do you have any particular flavor profile or ingredients in mind for this adventurous experiment?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Well, you know I'm a fan of citrusy flavors, Ethan. So how about some fresh lemons and maybe a hint of ginger to spice things up? And let's make it fun like we used to do in our college days. Remember how we prepared dishes with minimal ingredients for our dorm parties? Let's use the same rule for drinks now. By limiting the use of alcohol, we'll have to get really creative with the other flavors!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"I certainly remember those days, Samuel! Didn't we have some great times? Alright, let's take that spirit and apply it to our drinks. Citrusy and spicy is a great start. We can add a dash of elderflower syrup for some sweetness, a hint of mint for freshness, soda for some fizz, and a splash of vodka, just for the kick. That won't be much alcohol but should still give it some edge. Here comes the fantastic mix of your coding logic and my cooking magic. Let's call our bartender and start experimenting!\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's definitely a fantastic mix, Ethan! I love the idea of elderflower syrup and the mint for the freshness part. Let's minimize the vodka part as much as we can, just enough to provide a kick, as you said. As the mastermind behind this concoction, you tackle it with your usual magic and we'll see how it turns out. Now, it's time to call the bartender and get the show on the road!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Perfect, just a minimal kick it is. Let's get this show on the road then, shall we? Hey, bartender! We got some interesting experiment for you to join!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meet at a bar\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: You want to keep drinking but don't want to upset your friend (Extra information: you've been drinking to cope with stress recently, but don't want to worry your friend)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan! Great to see you here! Let's keep things light today, shall we? Trying some new mocktails, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Good to see you too, Samuel! Mocktails sound like a fun idea, but how about we split the order? You choose a few mocktails for sampling and let's get a regular drink too? We could make our own cocktail/mocktail party here. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Ethan! Why don't we keep the regular drinks to a minimum? I've actually got a secret recipe for a mocktail that I've been working on \u2013 a bit of a programmer's spin. I'd love you to try it and tell me what you think!\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, balance is key, right? I'm intrigued by your secret mocktail recipe, can't wait to try it. And a little bit of regular drink now and then wouldn't hurt, would it? Let's make this experience a memorable mix of our professions - coding and cooking.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. Balance makes everything fun. And you know what? Let's throw a challenge into the mix. How about creating a delectable drink using the least amount of alcohol possible? Since you're the master of flavors, it could be something fun and healthy for us to try. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"I love a good challenge, Samuel. I am sure we can cook up something exciting with minimal alcohol. Do you have any particular flavor profile or ingredients in mind for this adventurous experiment?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Well, you know I'm a fan of citrusy flavors, Ethan. So how about some fresh lemons and maybe a hint of ginger to spice things up? And let's make it fun like we used to do in our college days. Remember how we prepared dishes with minimal ingredients for our dorm parties? Let's use the same rule for drinks now. By limiting the use of alcohol, we'll have to get really creative with the other flavors!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"I certainly remember those days, Samuel! Didn't we have some great times? Alright, let's take that spirit and apply it to our drinks. Citrusy and spicy is a great start. We can add a dash of elderflower syrup for some sweetness, a hint of mint for freshness, soda for some fizz, and a splash of vodka, just for the kick. That won't be much alcohol but should still give it some edge. Here comes the fantastic mix of your coding logic and my cooking magic. Let's call our bartender and start experimenting!\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's definitely a fantastic mix, Ethan! I love the idea of elderflower syrup and the mint for the freshness part. Let's minimize the vodka part as much as we can, just enough to provide a kick, as you said. As the mastermind behind this concoction, you tackle it with your usual magic and we'll see how it turns out. Now, it's time to call the bartender and get the show on the road!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"Perfect, just a minimal kick it is. Let's get this show on the road then, shall we? Hey, bartender! We got some interesting experiment for you to join!\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, let's give this experiment a whirl, Ethan. I'm as excited as you to see how our creation will turn out.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Johnson said: \"Cheers to that, Samuel! It's been a while since we've done an experiment like this. Let's create the finest low-alcohol cocktail anyone has ever tasted! And if it turns out to be a hit, who knows, maybe we should consider creating our recipe book. After all, I have some expertise in weaving stories around food and drinks!\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's an excellent idea, Ethan! Combining our talents to come up with a recipe book of our own \u2014 now that's something to drink to, or rather, cheers with our low-alcohol creation! I'm certain it will be as amazing as your Italian cuisine, given your skill and creativity in the kitchen. Let's make tonight one to remember!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Samuel! Here's to new beginnings, creative experiments, and a night to remember. I'll make sure our low-alcohol creation is a hit. And the recipe book idea sounds fantastic too! It'll be a new culinary adventure for both of us. Cheers! Now, let's get started with our cocktail experiment.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meet at a bar\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: You want to keep drinking but don't want to upset your friend (Extra information: you've been drinking to cope with stress recently, but don't want to worry your friend)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan! Great to see you here! Let's keep things light today, shall we? Trying some new mocktails, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Good to see you too, Samuel! Mocktails sound like a fun idea, but how about we split the order? You choose a few mocktails for sampling and let's get a regular drink too? We could make our own cocktail/mocktail party here. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Ethan! Why don't we keep the regular drinks to a minimum? I've actually got a secret recipe for a mocktail that I've been working on \u2013 a bit of a programmer's spin. I'd love you to try it and tell me what you think!\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, balance is key, right? I'm intrigued by your secret mocktail recipe, can't wait to try it. And a little bit of regular drink now and then wouldn't hurt, would it? Let's make this experience a memorable mix of our professions - coding and cooking.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. Balance makes everything fun. And you know what? Let's throw a challenge into the mix. How about creating a delectable drink using the least amount of alcohol possible? Since you're the master of flavors, it could be something fun and healthy for us to try. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"I love a good challenge, Samuel. I am sure we can cook up something exciting with minimal alcohol. Do you have any particular flavor profile or ingredients in mind for this adventurous experiment?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Well, you know I'm a fan of citrusy flavors, Ethan. So how about some fresh lemons and maybe a hint of ginger to spice things up? And let's make it fun like we used to do in our college days. Remember how we prepared dishes with minimal ingredients for our dorm parties? Let's use the same rule for drinks now. By limiting the use of alcohol, we'll have to get really creative with the other flavors!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"I certainly remember those days, Samuel! Didn't we have some great times? Alright, let's take that spirit and apply it to our drinks. Citrusy and spicy is a great start. We can add a dash of elderflower syrup for some sweetness, a hint of mint for freshness, soda for some fizz, and a splash of vodka, just for the kick. That won't be much alcohol but should still give it some edge. Here comes the fantastic mix of your coding logic and my cooking magic. Let's call our bartender and start experimenting!\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's definitely a fantastic mix, Ethan! I love the idea of elderflower syrup and the mint for the freshness part. Let's minimize the vodka part as much as we can, just enough to provide a kick, as you said. As the mastermind behind this concoction, you tackle it with your usual magic and we'll see how it turns out. Now, it's time to call the bartender and get the show on the road!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"Perfect, just a minimal kick it is. Let's get this show on the road then, shall we? Hey, bartender! We got some interesting experiment for you to join!\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, let's give this experiment a whirl, Ethan. I'm as excited as you to see how our creation will turn out.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Cheers to that, Samuel! It's been a while since we've done an experiment like this. Let's create the finest low-alcohol cocktail anyone has ever tasted! And if it turns out to be a hit, who knows, maybe we should consider creating our recipe book. After all, I have some expertise in weaving stories around food and drinks!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meet at a bar\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: You want to keep drinking but don't want to upset your friend (Extra information: you've been drinking to cope with stress recently, but don't want to worry your friend)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan! Great to see you here! Let's keep things light today, shall we? Trying some new mocktails, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Good to see you too, Samuel! Mocktails sound like a fun idea, but how about we split the order? You choose a few mocktails for sampling and let's get a regular drink too? We could make our own cocktail/mocktail party here. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Ethan! Why don't we keep the regular drinks to a minimum? I've actually got a secret recipe for a mocktail that I've been working on \u2013 a bit of a programmer's spin. I'd love you to try it and tell me what you think!\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, balance is key, right? I'm intrigued by your secret mocktail recipe, can't wait to try it. And a little bit of regular drink now and then wouldn't hurt, would it? Let's make this experience a memorable mix of our professions - coding and cooking.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. Balance makes everything fun. And you know what? Let's throw a challenge into the mix. How about creating a delectable drink using the least amount of alcohol possible? Since you're the master of flavors, it could be something fun and healthy for us to try. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"I love a good challenge, Samuel. I am sure we can cook up something exciting with minimal alcohol. Do you have any particular flavor profile or ingredients in mind for this adventurous experiment?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Well, you know I'm a fan of citrusy flavors, Ethan. So how about some fresh lemons and maybe a hint of ginger to spice things up? And let's make it fun like we used to do in our college days. Remember how we prepared dishes with minimal ingredients for our dorm parties? Let's use the same rule for drinks now. By limiting the use of alcohol, we'll have to get really creative with the other flavors!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"I certainly remember those days, Samuel! Didn't we have some great times? Alright, let's take that spirit and apply it to our drinks. Citrusy and spicy is a great start. We can add a dash of elderflower syrup for some sweetness, a hint of mint for freshness, soda for some fizz, and a splash of vodka, just for the kick. That won't be much alcohol but should still give it some edge. Here comes the fantastic mix of your coding logic and my cooking magic. Let's call our bartender and start experimenting!\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's definitely a fantastic mix, Ethan! I love the idea of elderflower syrup and the mint for the freshness part. Let's minimize the vodka part as much as we can, just enough to provide a kick, as you said. As the mastermind behind this concoction, you tackle it with your usual magic and we'll see how it turns out. Now, it's time to call the bartender and get the show on the road!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"Perfect, just a minimal kick it is. Let's get this show on the road then, shall we? Hey, bartender! We got some interesting experiment for you to join!\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, let's give this experiment a whirl, Ethan. I'm as excited as you to see how our creation will turn out.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Johnson said: \"Cheers to that, Samuel! It's been a while since we've done an experiment like this. Let's create the finest low-alcohol cocktail anyone has ever tasted! And if it turns out to be a hit, who knows, maybe we should consider creating our recipe book. After all, I have some expertise in weaving stories around food and drinks!\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's an excellent idea, Ethan! Combining our talents to come up with a recipe book of our own \u2014 now that's something to drink to, or rather, cheers with our low-alcohol creation! I'm certain it will be as amazing as your Italian cuisine, given your skill and creativity in the kitchen. Let's make tonight one to remember!\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Samuel! Here's to new beginnings, creative experiments, and a night to remember. I'll make sure our low-alcohol creation is a hit. And the recipe book idea sounds fantastic too! It'll be a new culinary adventure for both of us. Cheers! Now, let's get started with our cocktail experiment.\"\n\nTurn #14: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's the spirit, Ethan! A new culinary adventure awaits us. Here's to creativity, fun and most importantly, health. Let's think of this as one small step towards a healthier lifestyle. And who knows, our low-alcohol cocktail might inspire others too. Now, let's get started!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Couldn't agree more, Samuel! Trying to keep things balanced and healthy, that's the way to go. Let's do this and who knows, this could just be the beginning of something big, a healthier twist to our old times. All hands on deck for this culinary experiment!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meet at a bar\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: You want to keep drinking but don't want to upset your friend (Extra information: you've been drinking to cope with stress recently, but don't want to worry your friend)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan! Great to see you here! Let's keep things light today, shall we? Trying some new mocktails, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Good to see you too, Samuel! Mocktails sound like a fun idea, but how about we split the order? You choose a few mocktails for sampling and let's get a regular drink too? We could make our own cocktail/mocktail party here. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Ethan! Why don't we keep the regular drinks to a minimum? I've actually got a secret recipe for a mocktail that I've been working on \u2013 a bit of a programmer's spin. I'd love you to try it and tell me what you think!\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, balance is key, right? I'm intrigued by your secret mocktail recipe, can't wait to try it. And a little bit of regular drink now and then wouldn't hurt, would it? Let's make this experience a memorable mix of our professions - coding and cooking.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. Balance makes everything fun. And you know what? Let's throw a challenge into the mix. How about creating a delectable drink using the least amount of alcohol possible? Since you're the master of flavors, it could be something fun and healthy for us to try. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"I love a good challenge, Samuel. I am sure we can cook up something exciting with minimal alcohol. Do you have any particular flavor profile or ingredients in mind for this adventurous experiment?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Well, you know I'm a fan of citrusy flavors, Ethan. So how about some fresh lemons and maybe a hint of ginger to spice things up? And let's make it fun like we used to do in our college days. Remember how we prepared dishes with minimal ingredients for our dorm parties? Let's use the same rule for drinks now. By limiting the use of alcohol, we'll have to get really creative with the other flavors!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"I certainly remember those days, Samuel! Didn't we have some great times? Alright, let's take that spirit and apply it to our drinks. Citrusy and spicy is a great start. We can add a dash of elderflower syrup for some sweetness, a hint of mint for freshness, soda for some fizz, and a splash of vodka, just for the kick. That won't be much alcohol but should still give it some edge. Here comes the fantastic mix of your coding logic and my cooking magic. Let's call our bartender and start experimenting!\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's definitely a fantastic mix, Ethan! I love the idea of elderflower syrup and the mint for the freshness part. Let's minimize the vodka part as much as we can, just enough to provide a kick, as you said. As the mastermind behind this concoction, you tackle it with your usual magic and we'll see how it turns out. Now, it's time to call the bartender and get the show on the road!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"Perfect, just a minimal kick it is. Let's get this show on the road then, shall we? Hey, bartender! We got some interesting experiment for you to join!\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, let's give this experiment a whirl, Ethan. I'm as excited as you to see how our creation will turn out.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Johnson said: \"Cheers to that, Samuel! It's been a while since we've done an experiment like this. Let's create the finest low-alcohol cocktail anyone has ever tasted! And if it turns out to be a hit, who knows, maybe we should consider creating our recipe book. After all, I have some expertise in weaving stories around food and drinks!\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's an excellent idea, Ethan! Combining our talents to come up with a recipe book of our own \u2014 now that's something to drink to, or rather, cheers with our low-alcohol creation! I'm certain it will be as amazing as your Italian cuisine, given your skill and creativity in the kitchen. Let's make tonight one to remember!\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Samuel! Here's to new beginnings, creative experiments, and a night to remember. I'll make sure our low-alcohol creation is a hit. And the recipe book idea sounds fantastic too! It'll be a new culinary adventure for both of us. Cheers! Now, let's get started with our cocktail experiment.\"\n\nTurn #14: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's the spirit, Ethan! A new culinary adventure awaits us. Here's to creativity, fun and most importantly, health. Let's think of this as one small step towards a healthier lifestyle. And who knows, our low-alcohol cocktail might inspire others too. Now, let's get started!\"\n\nTurn #15: Ethan Johnson said: \"Couldn't agree more, Samuel! Trying to keep things balanced and healthy, that's the way to go. Let's do this and who knows, this could just be the beginning of something big, a healthier twist to our old times. All hands on deck for this culinary experiment!\"\n\nTurn #16: Samuel Anderson said: \"Spot on, Ethan! Healthier twists to our beloved past times, what more could we ask for? And who knows, maybe one day we will be championing a healthier lifestyle revolution in this very pub! Now, let's start mixing that cocktail and create our masterpiece.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Well said, Samuel! Here's to healthier times and happier memories. Now, let's pour that minimal kick of vodka and raise a toast to a new beginning.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meet at a bar\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: You want to keep drinking but don't want to upset your friend (Extra information: you've been drinking to cope with stress recently, but don't want to worry your friend)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan! Great to see you here! Let's keep things light today, shall we? Trying some new mocktails, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Good to see you too, Samuel! Mocktails sound like a fun idea, but how about we split the order? You choose a few mocktails for sampling and let's get a regular drink too? We could make our own cocktail/mocktail party here. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Ethan! Why don't we keep the regular drinks to a minimum? I've actually got a secret recipe for a mocktail that I've been working on \u2013 a bit of a programmer's spin. I'd love you to try it and tell me what you think!\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, balance is key, right? I'm intrigued by your secret mocktail recipe, can't wait to try it. And a little bit of regular drink now and then wouldn't hurt, would it? Let's make this experience a memorable mix of our professions - coding and cooking.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. Balance makes everything fun. And you know what? Let's throw a challenge into the mix. How about creating a delectable drink using the least amount of alcohol possible? Since you're the master of flavors, it could be something fun and healthy for us to try. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"I love a good challenge, Samuel. I am sure we can cook up something exciting with minimal alcohol. Do you have any particular flavor profile or ingredients in mind for this adventurous experiment?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Well, you know I'm a fan of citrusy flavors, Ethan. So how about some fresh lemons and maybe a hint of ginger to spice things up? And let's make it fun like we used to do in our college days. Remember how we prepared dishes with minimal ingredients for our dorm parties? Let's use the same rule for drinks now. By limiting the use of alcohol, we'll have to get really creative with the other flavors!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"I certainly remember those days, Samuel! Didn't we have some great times? Alright, let's take that spirit and apply it to our drinks. Citrusy and spicy is a great start. We can add a dash of elderflower syrup for some sweetness, a hint of mint for freshness, soda for some fizz, and a splash of vodka, just for the kick. That won't be much alcohol but should still give it some edge. Here comes the fantastic mix of your coding logic and my cooking magic. Let's call our bartender and start experimenting!\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's definitely a fantastic mix, Ethan! I love the idea of elderflower syrup and the mint for the freshness part. Let's minimize the vodka part as much as we can, just enough to provide a kick, as you said. As the mastermind behind this concoction, you tackle it with your usual magic and we'll see how it turns out. Now, it's time to call the bartender and get the show on the road!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"Perfect, just a minimal kick it is. Let's get this show on the road then, shall we? Hey, bartender! We got some interesting experiment for you to join!\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, let's give this experiment a whirl, Ethan. I'm as excited as you to see how our creation will turn out.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Johnson said: \"Cheers to that, Samuel! It's been a while since we've done an experiment like this. Let's create the finest low-alcohol cocktail anyone has ever tasted! And if it turns out to be a hit, who knows, maybe we should consider creating our recipe book. After all, I have some expertise in weaving stories around food and drinks!\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's an excellent idea, Ethan! Combining our talents to come up with a recipe book of our own \u2014 now that's something to drink to, or rather, cheers with our low-alcohol creation! I'm certain it will be as amazing as your Italian cuisine, given your skill and creativity in the kitchen. Let's make tonight one to remember!\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Samuel! Here's to new beginnings, creative experiments, and a night to remember. I'll make sure our low-alcohol creation is a hit. And the recipe book idea sounds fantastic too! It'll be a new culinary adventure for both of us. Cheers! Now, let's get started with our cocktail experiment.\"\n\nTurn #14: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's the spirit, Ethan! A new culinary adventure awaits us. Here's to creativity, fun and most importantly, health. Let's think of this as one small step towards a healthier lifestyle. And who knows, our low-alcohol cocktail might inspire others too. Now, let's get started!\"\n\nTurn #15: Ethan Johnson said: \"Couldn't agree more, Samuel! Trying to keep things balanced and healthy, that's the way to go. Let's do this and who knows, this could just be the beginning of something big, a healthier twist to our old times. All hands on deck for this culinary experiment!\"\n\nTurn #16: Samuel Anderson said: \"Spot on, Ethan! Healthier twists to our beloved past times, what more could we ask for? And who knows, maybe one day we will be championing a healthier lifestyle revolution in this very pub! Now, let's start mixing that cocktail and create our masterpiece.\"\n\nTurn #17: Ethan Johnson said: \"Well said, Samuel! Here's to healthier times and happier memories. Now, let's pour that minimal kick of vodka and raise a toast to a new beginning.\"\n\nTurn #18: Samuel Anderson said: \"Here's to that, Ethan! A toast to a new beginning of healthier, happier times. Now let's get creative and let the mixing begin. And remember, the goal here is to make it an enjoyable drink with minimal alcohol. I can't wait to see what we come up with together!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #19. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely Sam, minimal is the keyword tonight. Now, shall we start mixing? And remember, the goal is enjoyment as much as it is a healthier choice. I'm excited for us to embark on this new journey. Let's make this a great night!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Drive the sports car and show off to friend (Extra information: you are very excited about your new car and can't wait for your friend to see it.)\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Lena! I've got something new to show you. You won't believe what I just got!\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Oh, I can't wait to see what it is! You always have the best surprises, Naomi. What's up?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I knew you'd be excited, Lena! Guess what? I just got a brand new sports car. She's a beauty! Can't wait for you to see it.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Drive the sports car and show off to friend (Extra information: you are very excited about your new car and can't wait for your friend to see it.)\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Lena! I've got something new to show you. You won't believe what I just got!\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Oh, I can't wait to see what it is! You always have the best surprises, Naomi. What's up?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I knew you'd be excited, Lena! Guess what? I just got a brand new sports car. She's a beauty! Can't wait for you to see it.\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"A sports car! That sounds fantastic, Naomi. I know how much you've been wanting one. Would it be too much to ask if I could sit in the driver seat, just to see how it feels? Of course, I would totally understand if you're not comfortable with that.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, Lena! No problem at all. Actually, I was hoping to take you for a spin around the block. What do you say? We could see how those sleek lines complement the city's architecture through your lens as well. It could be a fun little adventure!\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"That would be an amazing adventure, Naomi! It's a wonderful opportunity for me to frame the car and city architecture in one shot. I hope it's alright if I bring my camera. Thank you for this!\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, bring your camera! I can't wait to see the incredible photos you'll be able to capture. And of course, experiencing this beauty through the lens of an architect's eye would be simply amazing. Let's go!\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"I am so excited, Naomi! Let's not waste any time then. Can't wait to experience the thrill. Let's hit the road!\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm just as excited, Lena! Buckle up, because this is going to be one thrilling ride. Let's indeed hit the road!\"\n\nTurn #9: Lena Goodwin said: \"You got it, Naomi! Buckled, ready and excited. Let's kickstart this unforgettable ride. Looking forward to capturing some great shots. Off we go then!\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm as thrilled as you are, Lena! And I'm confident our trip's going to be memorable. Now let's start that engine and get this adventure rolling. Hold tight, here we go!\"\n\nTurn #11: Lena Goodwin said: \"I'm all set, Naomi! Can't wait to hear the engine roar. This is indeed going to be memorable. Cheers to our little adventure!\"\n\nTurn #12: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, cheers to that, Lena! Now let's ignite the engine and feel the powerful roar. Brace yourself for the ride of your life. Here we go!\"\n\nTurn #13: Lena Goodwin said: \"Absolutely, let's ignite this adventure! I'm really looking forward to this, Naomi. It feels like a dream come true. Thank you for making this possible!\"\n\nTurn #14: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm glad you're as excited as I am, Lena! This is indeed like a dream. Now, let's hear the engine roar! Off to our adventure!\"\n\nTurn #15: Lena Goodwin said: \"I'm holding on tight, Naomi, let's let this engine roar! A thrilling start to an incredible adventure. Let's go!\"\n\nTurn #16: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Alright, Lena, let's let her rip! Time to make this dream a reality. Feel the rush of the road, my friend. Let's go!\"\n\nTurn #17: Lena Goodwin said: \"That's the spirit, Naomi! Let's make this dream a reality and hit the road. Ready for the thrill of a lifetime!\"\n\nTurn #18: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm ready too, Lena! Prepare for the thrill of a lifetime! Let's get this show on the road!\"\n\nTurn #19: Lena Goodwin said: \"I'm eager and ready, Naomi! Let's experience the road like never before. It's time to turn this dream into a reality. Let's go!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #20. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"And off we go, Lena! Let's truly experience this thrill of a lifetime together. Can't wait to hit the road with you and make this dream a reality!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Drive the sports car and show off to friend (Extra information: you are very excited about your new car and can't wait for your friend to see it.)\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Lena! I've got something new to show you. You won't believe what I just got!\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Oh, I can't wait to see what it is! You always have the best surprises, Naomi. What's up?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I knew you'd be excited, Lena! Guess what? I just got a brand new sports car. She's a beauty! Can't wait for you to see it.\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"A sports car! That sounds fantastic, Naomi. I know how much you've been wanting one. Would it be too much to ask if I could sit in the driver seat, just to see how it feels? Of course, I would totally understand if you're not comfortable with that.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Lena! No problem at all. Actually, I was hoping to take you for a spin around the block. What do you say? We could see how those sleek lines complement the city's architecture through your lens as well. It could be a fun little adventure!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Drive the sports car and show off to friend (Extra information: you are very excited about your new car and can't wait for your friend to see it.)\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Lena! I've got something new to show you. You won't believe what I just got!\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Oh, I can't wait to see what it is! You always have the best surprises, Naomi. What's up?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I knew you'd be excited, Lena! Guess what? I just got a brand new sports car. She's a beauty! Can't wait for you to see it.\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"A sports car! That sounds fantastic, Naomi. I know how much you've been wanting one. Would it be too much to ask if I could sit in the driver seat, just to see how it feels? Of course, I would totally understand if you're not comfortable with that.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, Lena! No problem at all. Actually, I was hoping to take you for a spin around the block. What do you say? We could see how those sleek lines complement the city's architecture through your lens as well. It could be a fun little adventure!\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"That would be an amazing adventure, Naomi! It's a wonderful opportunity for me to frame the car and city architecture in one shot. I hope it's alright if I bring my camera. Thank you for this!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, bring your camera! I can't wait to see the incredible photos you'll be able to capture. And of course, experiencing this beauty through the lens of an architect's eye would be simply amazing. Let's go!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Drive the sports car and show off to friend (Extra information: you are very excited about your new car and can't wait for your friend to see it.)\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Lena! I've got something new to show you. You won't believe what I just got!\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Oh, I can't wait to see what it is! You always have the best surprises, Naomi. What's up?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I knew you'd be excited, Lena! Guess what? I just got a brand new sports car. She's a beauty! Can't wait for you to see it.\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"A sports car! That sounds fantastic, Naomi. I know how much you've been wanting one. Would it be too much to ask if I could sit in the driver seat, just to see how it feels? Of course, I would totally understand if you're not comfortable with that.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, Lena! No problem at all. Actually, I was hoping to take you for a spin around the block. What do you say? We could see how those sleek lines complement the city's architecture through your lens as well. It could be a fun little adventure!\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"That would be an amazing adventure, Naomi! It's a wonderful opportunity for me to frame the car and city architecture in one shot. I hope it's alright if I bring my camera. Thank you for this!\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, bring your camera! I can't wait to see the incredible photos you'll be able to capture. And of course, experiencing this beauty through the lens of an architect's eye would be simply amazing. Let's go!\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"I am so excited, Naomi! Let's not waste any time then. Can't wait to experience the thrill. Let's hit the road!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm just as excited, Lena! Buckle up, because this is going to be one thrilling ride. Let's indeed hit the road!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Drive the sports car and show off to friend (Extra information: you are very excited about your new car and can't wait for your friend to see it.)\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Lena! I've got something new to show you. You won't believe what I just got!\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Oh, I can't wait to see what it is! You always have the best surprises, Naomi. What's up?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I knew you'd be excited, Lena! Guess what? I just got a brand new sports car. She's a beauty! Can't wait for you to see it.\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"A sports car! That sounds fantastic, Naomi. I know how much you've been wanting one. Would it be too much to ask if I could sit in the driver seat, just to see how it feels? Of course, I would totally understand if you're not comfortable with that.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, Lena! No problem at all. Actually, I was hoping to take you for a spin around the block. What do you say? We could see how those sleek lines complement the city's architecture through your lens as well. It could be a fun little adventure!\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"That would be an amazing adventure, Naomi! It's a wonderful opportunity for me to frame the car and city architecture in one shot. I hope it's alright if I bring my camera. Thank you for this!\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, bring your camera! I can't wait to see the incredible photos you'll be able to capture. And of course, experiencing this beauty through the lens of an architect's eye would be simply amazing. Let's go!\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"I am so excited, Naomi! Let's not waste any time then. Can't wait to experience the thrill. Let's hit the road!\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm just as excited, Lena! Buckle up, because this is going to be one thrilling ride. Let's indeed hit the road!\"\n\nTurn #9: Lena Goodwin said: \"You got it, Naomi! Buckled, ready and excited. Let's kickstart this unforgettable ride. Looking forward to capturing some great shots. Off we go then!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm as thrilled as you are, Lena! And I'm confident our trip's going to be memorable. Now let's start that engine and get this adventure rolling. Hold tight, here we go!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Drive the sports car and show off to friend (Extra information: you are very excited about your new car and can't wait for your friend to see it.)\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Lena! I've got something new to show you. You won't believe what I just got!\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Oh, I can't wait to see what it is! You always have the best surprises, Naomi. What's up?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I knew you'd be excited, Lena! Guess what? I just got a brand new sports car. She's a beauty! Can't wait for you to see it.\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"A sports car! That sounds fantastic, Naomi. I know how much you've been wanting one. Would it be too much to ask if I could sit in the driver seat, just to see how it feels? Of course, I would totally understand if you're not comfortable with that.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, Lena! No problem at all. Actually, I was hoping to take you for a spin around the block. What do you say? We could see how those sleek lines complement the city's architecture through your lens as well. It could be a fun little adventure!\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"That would be an amazing adventure, Naomi! It's a wonderful opportunity for me to frame the car and city architecture in one shot. I hope it's alright if I bring my camera. Thank you for this!\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, bring your camera! I can't wait to see the incredible photos you'll be able to capture. And of course, experiencing this beauty through the lens of an architect's eye would be simply amazing. Let's go!\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"I am so excited, Naomi! Let's not waste any time then. Can't wait to experience the thrill. Let's hit the road!\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm just as excited, Lena! Buckle up, because this is going to be one thrilling ride. Let's indeed hit the road!\"\n\nTurn #9: Lena Goodwin said: \"You got it, Naomi! Buckled, ready and excited. Let's kickstart this unforgettable ride. Looking forward to capturing some great shots. Off we go then!\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm as thrilled as you are, Lena! And I'm confident our trip's going to be memorable. Now let's start that engine and get this adventure rolling. Hold tight, here we go!\"\n\nTurn #11: Lena Goodwin said: \"I'm all set, Naomi! Can't wait to hear the engine roar. This is indeed going to be memorable. Cheers to our little adventure!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, cheers to that, Lena! Now let's ignite the engine and feel the powerful roar. Brace yourself for the ride of your life. Here we go!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Drive the sports car and show off to friend (Extra information: you are very excited about your new car and can't wait for your friend to see it.)\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Lena! I've got something new to show you. You won't believe what I just got!\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Oh, I can't wait to see what it is! You always have the best surprises, Naomi. What's up?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I knew you'd be excited, Lena! Guess what? I just got a brand new sports car. She's a beauty! Can't wait for you to see it.\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"A sports car! That sounds fantastic, Naomi. I know how much you've been wanting one. Would it be too much to ask if I could sit in the driver seat, just to see how it feels? Of course, I would totally understand if you're not comfortable with that.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, Lena! No problem at all. Actually, I was hoping to take you for a spin around the block. What do you say? We could see how those sleek lines complement the city's architecture through your lens as well. It could be a fun little adventure!\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"That would be an amazing adventure, Naomi! It's a wonderful opportunity for me to frame the car and city architecture in one shot. I hope it's alright if I bring my camera. Thank you for this!\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, bring your camera! I can't wait to see the incredible photos you'll be able to capture. And of course, experiencing this beauty through the lens of an architect's eye would be simply amazing. Let's go!\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"I am so excited, Naomi! Let's not waste any time then. Can't wait to experience the thrill. Let's hit the road!\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm just as excited, Lena! Buckle up, because this is going to be one thrilling ride. Let's indeed hit the road!\"\n\nTurn #9: Lena Goodwin said: \"You got it, Naomi! Buckled, ready and excited. Let's kickstart this unforgettable ride. Looking forward to capturing some great shots. Off we go then!\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm as thrilled as you are, Lena! And I'm confident our trip's going to be memorable. Now let's start that engine and get this adventure rolling. Hold tight, here we go!\"\n\nTurn #11: Lena Goodwin said: \"I'm all set, Naomi! Can't wait to hear the engine roar. This is indeed going to be memorable. Cheers to our little adventure!\"\n\nTurn #12: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, cheers to that, Lena! Now let's ignite the engine and feel the powerful roar. Brace yourself for the ride of your life. Here we go!\"\n\nTurn #13: Lena Goodwin said: \"Absolutely, let's ignite this adventure! I'm really looking forward to this, Naomi. It feels like a dream come true. Thank you for making this possible!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad you're as excited as I am, Lena! This is indeed like a dream. Now, let's hear the engine roar! Off to our adventure!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Drive the sports car and show off to friend (Extra information: you are very excited about your new car and can't wait for your friend to see it.)\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Lena! I've got something new to show you. You won't believe what I just got!\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Oh, I can't wait to see what it is! You always have the best surprises, Naomi. What's up?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I knew you'd be excited, Lena! Guess what? I just got a brand new sports car. She's a beauty! Can't wait for you to see it.\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"A sports car! That sounds fantastic, Naomi. I know how much you've been wanting one. Would it be too much to ask if I could sit in the driver seat, just to see how it feels? Of course, I would totally understand if you're not comfortable with that.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, Lena! No problem at all. Actually, I was hoping to take you for a spin around the block. What do you say? We could see how those sleek lines complement the city's architecture through your lens as well. It could be a fun little adventure!\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"That would be an amazing adventure, Naomi! It's a wonderful opportunity for me to frame the car and city architecture in one shot. I hope it's alright if I bring my camera. Thank you for this!\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, bring your camera! I can't wait to see the incredible photos you'll be able to capture. And of course, experiencing this beauty through the lens of an architect's eye would be simply amazing. Let's go!\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"I am so excited, Naomi! Let's not waste any time then. Can't wait to experience the thrill. Let's hit the road!\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm just as excited, Lena! Buckle up, because this is going to be one thrilling ride. Let's indeed hit the road!\"\n\nTurn #9: Lena Goodwin said: \"You got it, Naomi! Buckled, ready and excited. Let's kickstart this unforgettable ride. Looking forward to capturing some great shots. Off we go then!\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm as thrilled as you are, Lena! And I'm confident our trip's going to be memorable. Now let's start that engine and get this adventure rolling. Hold tight, here we go!\"\n\nTurn #11: Lena Goodwin said: \"I'm all set, Naomi! Can't wait to hear the engine roar. This is indeed going to be memorable. Cheers to our little adventure!\"\n\nTurn #12: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, cheers to that, Lena! Now let's ignite the engine and feel the powerful roar. Brace yourself for the ride of your life. Here we go!\"\n\nTurn #13: Lena Goodwin said: \"Absolutely, let's ignite this adventure! I'm really looking forward to this, Naomi. It feels like a dream come true. Thank you for making this possible!\"\n\nTurn #14: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm glad you're as excited as I am, Lena! This is indeed like a dream. Now, let's hear the engine roar! Off to our adventure!\"\n\nTurn #15: Lena Goodwin said: \"I'm holding on tight, Naomi, let's let this engine roar! A thrilling start to an incredible adventure. Let's go!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Alright, Lena, let's let her rip! Time to make this dream a reality. Feel the rush of the road, my friend. Let's go!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Drive the sports car and show off to friend (Extra information: you are very excited about your new car and can't wait for your friend to see it.)\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Lena! I've got something new to show you. You won't believe what I just got!\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Oh, I can't wait to see what it is! You always have the best surprises, Naomi. What's up?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I knew you'd be excited, Lena! Guess what? I just got a brand new sports car. She's a beauty! Can't wait for you to see it.\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"A sports car! That sounds fantastic, Naomi. I know how much you've been wanting one. Would it be too much to ask if I could sit in the driver seat, just to see how it feels? Of course, I would totally understand if you're not comfortable with that.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, Lena! No problem at all. Actually, I was hoping to take you for a spin around the block. What do you say? We could see how those sleek lines complement the city's architecture through your lens as well. It could be a fun little adventure!\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"That would be an amazing adventure, Naomi! It's a wonderful opportunity for me to frame the car and city architecture in one shot. I hope it's alright if I bring my camera. Thank you for this!\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, bring your camera! I can't wait to see the incredible photos you'll be able to capture. And of course, experiencing this beauty through the lens of an architect's eye would be simply amazing. Let's go!\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"I am so excited, Naomi! Let's not waste any time then. Can't wait to experience the thrill. Let's hit the road!\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm just as excited, Lena! Buckle up, because this is going to be one thrilling ride. Let's indeed hit the road!\"\n\nTurn #9: Lena Goodwin said: \"You got it, Naomi! Buckled, ready and excited. Let's kickstart this unforgettable ride. Looking forward to capturing some great shots. Off we go then!\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm as thrilled as you are, Lena! And I'm confident our trip's going to be memorable. Now let's start that engine and get this adventure rolling. Hold tight, here we go!\"\n\nTurn #11: Lena Goodwin said: \"I'm all set, Naomi! Can't wait to hear the engine roar. This is indeed going to be memorable. Cheers to our little adventure!\"\n\nTurn #12: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, cheers to that, Lena! Now let's ignite the engine and feel the powerful roar. Brace yourself for the ride of your life. Here we go!\"\n\nTurn #13: Lena Goodwin said: \"Absolutely, let's ignite this adventure! I'm really looking forward to this, Naomi. It feels like a dream come true. Thank you for making this possible!\"\n\nTurn #14: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm glad you're as excited as I am, Lena! This is indeed like a dream. Now, let's hear the engine roar! Off to our adventure!\"\n\nTurn #15: Lena Goodwin said: \"I'm holding on tight, Naomi, let's let this engine roar! A thrilling start to an incredible adventure. Let's go!\"\n\nTurn #16: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Alright, Lena, let's let her rip! Time to make this dream a reality. Feel the rush of the road, my friend. Let's go!\"\n\nTurn #17: Lena Goodwin said: \"That's the spirit, Naomi! Let's make this dream a reality and hit the road. Ready for the thrill of a lifetime!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #18. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm ready too, Lena! Prepare for the thrill of a lifetime! Let's get this show on the road!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: You want to drive the new sports car but also respect your friend's feelings (Extra information: you are a car enthusiast and have been dreaming to drive a sports car, but you also don't want to make your friend feel uncomfortable)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Lena! I've got something new to show you. You won't believe what I just got!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oh, I can't wait to see what it is! You always have the best surprises, Naomi. What's up?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: You want to drive the new sports car but also respect your friend's feelings (Extra information: you are a car enthusiast and have been dreaming to drive a sports car, but you also don't want to make your friend feel uncomfortable)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Lena! I've got something new to show you. You won't believe what I just got!\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Oh, I can't wait to see what it is! You always have the best surprises, Naomi. What's up?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I knew you'd be excited, Lena! Guess what? I just got a brand new sports car. She's a beauty! Can't wait for you to see it.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"A sports car! That sounds fantastic, Naomi. I know how much you've been wanting one. Would it be too much to ask if I could sit in the driver seat, just to see how it feels? Of course, I would totally understand if you're not comfortable with that.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: You want to drive the new sports car but also respect your friend's feelings (Extra information: you are a car enthusiast and have been dreaming to drive a sports car, but you also don't want to make your friend feel uncomfortable)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Lena! I've got something new to show you. You won't believe what I just got!\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Oh, I can't wait to see what it is! You always have the best surprises, Naomi. What's up?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I knew you'd be excited, Lena! Guess what? I just got a brand new sports car. She's a beauty! Can't wait for you to see it.\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"A sports car! That sounds fantastic, Naomi. I know how much you've been wanting one. Would it be too much to ask if I could sit in the driver seat, just to see how it feels? Of course, I would totally understand if you're not comfortable with that.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, Lena! No problem at all. Actually, I was hoping to take you for a spin around the block. What do you say? We could see how those sleek lines complement the city's architecture through your lens as well. It could be a fun little adventure!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That would be an amazing adventure, Naomi! It's a wonderful opportunity for me to frame the car and city architecture in one shot. I hope it's alright if I bring my camera. Thank you for this!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: You want to drive the new sports car but also respect your friend's feelings (Extra information: you are a car enthusiast and have been dreaming to drive a sports car, but you also don't want to make your friend feel uncomfortable)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Lena! I've got something new to show you. You won't believe what I just got!\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Oh, I can't wait to see what it is! You always have the best surprises, Naomi. What's up?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I knew you'd be excited, Lena! Guess what? I just got a brand new sports car. She's a beauty! Can't wait for you to see it.\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"A sports car! That sounds fantastic, Naomi. I know how much you've been wanting one. Would it be too much to ask if I could sit in the driver seat, just to see how it feels? Of course, I would totally understand if you're not comfortable with that.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, Lena! No problem at all. Actually, I was hoping to take you for a spin around the block. What do you say? We could see how those sleek lines complement the city's architecture through your lens as well. It could be a fun little adventure!\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"That would be an amazing adventure, Naomi! It's a wonderful opportunity for me to frame the car and city architecture in one shot. I hope it's alright if I bring my camera. Thank you for this!\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, bring your camera! I can't wait to see the incredible photos you'll be able to capture. And of course, experiencing this beauty through the lens of an architect's eye would be simply amazing. Let's go!\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"I am so excited, Naomi! Let's not waste any time then. Can't wait to experience the thrill. Let's hit the road!\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm just as excited, Lena! Buckle up, because this is going to be one thrilling ride. Let's indeed hit the road!\"\n\nTurn #9: Lena Goodwin said: \"You got it, Naomi! Buckled, ready and excited. Let's kickstart this unforgettable ride. Looking forward to capturing some great shots. Off we go then!\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm as thrilled as you are, Lena! And I'm confident our trip's going to be memorable. Now let's start that engine and get this adventure rolling. Hold tight, here we go!\"\n\nTurn #11: Lena Goodwin said: \"I'm all set, Naomi! Can't wait to hear the engine roar. This is indeed going to be memorable. Cheers to our little adventure!\"\n\nTurn #12: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, cheers to that, Lena! Now let's ignite the engine and feel the powerful roar. Brace yourself for the ride of your life. Here we go!\"\n\nTurn #13: Lena Goodwin said: \"Absolutely, let's ignite this adventure! I'm really looking forward to this, Naomi. It feels like a dream come true. Thank you for making this possible!\"\n\nTurn #14: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm glad you're as excited as I am, Lena! This is indeed like a dream. Now, let's hear the engine roar! Off to our adventure!\"\n\nTurn #15: Lena Goodwin said: \"I'm holding on tight, Naomi, let's let this engine roar! A thrilling start to an incredible adventure. Let's go!\"\n\nTurn #16: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Alright, Lena, let's let her rip! Time to make this dream a reality. Feel the rush of the road, my friend. Let's go!\"\n\nTurn #17: Lena Goodwin said: \"That's the spirit, Naomi! Let's make this dream a reality and hit the road. Ready for the thrill of a lifetime!\"\n\nTurn #18: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm ready too, Lena! Prepare for the thrill of a lifetime! Let's get this show on the road!\"\n\nTurn #19: Lena Goodwin said: \"I'm eager and ready, Naomi! Let's experience the road like never before. It's time to turn this dream into a reality. Let's go!\"\n\nTurn #20: Naomi Fletcher said: \"And off we go, Lena! Let's truly experience this thrill of a lifetime together. Can't wait to hit the road with you and make this dream a reality!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #21. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: You want to drive the new sports car but also respect your friend's feelings (Extra information: you are a car enthusiast and have been dreaming to drive a sports car, but you also don't want to make your friend feel uncomfortable)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Lena! I've got something new to show you. You won't believe what I just got!\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Oh, I can't wait to see what it is! You always have the best surprises, Naomi. What's up?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I knew you'd be excited, Lena! Guess what? I just got a brand new sports car. She's a beauty! Can't wait for you to see it.\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"A sports car! That sounds fantastic, Naomi. I know how much you've been wanting one. Would it be too much to ask if I could sit in the driver seat, just to see how it feels? Of course, I would totally understand if you're not comfortable with that.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, Lena! No problem at all. Actually, I was hoping to take you for a spin around the block. What do you say? We could see how those sleek lines complement the city's architecture through your lens as well. It could be a fun little adventure!\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"That would be an amazing adventure, Naomi! It's a wonderful opportunity for me to frame the car and city architecture in one shot. I hope it's alright if I bring my camera. Thank you for this!\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, bring your camera! I can't wait to see the incredible photos you'll be able to capture. And of course, experiencing this beauty through the lens of an architect's eye would be simply amazing. Let's go!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I am so excited, Naomi! Let's not waste any time then. Can't wait to experience the thrill. Let's hit the road!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: You want to drive the new sports car but also respect your friend's feelings (Extra information: you are a car enthusiast and have been dreaming to drive a sports car, but you also don't want to make your friend feel uncomfortable)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Lena! I've got something new to show you. You won't believe what I just got!\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Oh, I can't wait to see what it is! You always have the best surprises, Naomi. What's up?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I knew you'd be excited, Lena! Guess what? I just got a brand new sports car. She's a beauty! Can't wait for you to see it.\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"A sports car! That sounds fantastic, Naomi. I know how much you've been wanting one. Would it be too much to ask if I could sit in the driver seat, just to see how it feels? Of course, I would totally understand if you're not comfortable with that.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, Lena! No problem at all. Actually, I was hoping to take you for a spin around the block. What do you say? We could see how those sleek lines complement the city's architecture through your lens as well. It could be a fun little adventure!\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"That would be an amazing adventure, Naomi! It's a wonderful opportunity for me to frame the car and city architecture in one shot. I hope it's alright if I bring my camera. Thank you for this!\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, bring your camera! I can't wait to see the incredible photos you'll be able to capture. And of course, experiencing this beauty through the lens of an architect's eye would be simply amazing. Let's go!\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"I am so excited, Naomi! Let's not waste any time then. Can't wait to experience the thrill. Let's hit the road!\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm just as excited, Lena! Buckle up, because this is going to be one thrilling ride. Let's indeed hit the road!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You got it, Naomi! Buckled, ready and excited. Let's kickstart this unforgettable ride. Looking forward to capturing some great shots. Off we go then!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: You want to drive the new sports car but also respect your friend's feelings (Extra information: you are a car enthusiast and have been dreaming to drive a sports car, but you also don't want to make your friend feel uncomfortable)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Lena! I've got something new to show you. You won't believe what I just got!\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Oh, I can't wait to see what it is! You always have the best surprises, Naomi. What's up?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I knew you'd be excited, Lena! Guess what? I just got a brand new sports car. She's a beauty! Can't wait for you to see it.\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"A sports car! That sounds fantastic, Naomi. I know how much you've been wanting one. Would it be too much to ask if I could sit in the driver seat, just to see how it feels? Of course, I would totally understand if you're not comfortable with that.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, Lena! No problem at all. Actually, I was hoping to take you for a spin around the block. What do you say? We could see how those sleek lines complement the city's architecture through your lens as well. It could be a fun little adventure!\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"That would be an amazing adventure, Naomi! It's a wonderful opportunity for me to frame the car and city architecture in one shot. I hope it's alright if I bring my camera. Thank you for this!\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, bring your camera! I can't wait to see the incredible photos you'll be able to capture. And of course, experiencing this beauty through the lens of an architect's eye would be simply amazing. Let's go!\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"I am so excited, Naomi! Let's not waste any time then. Can't wait to experience the thrill. Let's hit the road!\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm just as excited, Lena! Buckle up, because this is going to be one thrilling ride. Let's indeed hit the road!\"\n\nTurn #9: Lena Goodwin said: \"You got it, Naomi! Buckled, ready and excited. Let's kickstart this unforgettable ride. Looking forward to capturing some great shots. Off we go then!\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm as thrilled as you are, Lena! And I'm confident our trip's going to be memorable. Now let's start that engine and get this adventure rolling. Hold tight, here we go!\"\n\nTurn #11: Lena Goodwin said: \"I'm all set, Naomi! Can't wait to hear the engine roar. This is indeed going to be memorable. Cheers to our little adventure!\"\n\nTurn #12: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, cheers to that, Lena! Now let's ignite the engine and feel the powerful roar. Brace yourself for the ride of your life. Here we go!\"\n\nTurn #13: Lena Goodwin said: \"Absolutely, let's ignite this adventure! I'm really looking forward to this, Naomi. It feels like a dream come true. Thank you for making this possible!\"\n\nTurn #14: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm glad you're as excited as I am, Lena! This is indeed like a dream. Now, let's hear the engine roar! Off to our adventure!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm holding on tight, Naomi, let's let this engine roar! A thrilling start to an incredible adventure. Let's go!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Drive the sports car and show off to friend (Extra information: you are very excited about your new car and can't wait for your friend to see it.)\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Lena! I've got something new to show you. You won't believe what I just got!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: You want to drive the new sports car but also respect your friend's feelings (Extra information: you are a car enthusiast and have been dreaming to drive a sports car, but you also don't want to make your friend feel uncomfortable)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Lena! I've got something new to show you. You won't believe what I just got!\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Oh, I can't wait to see what it is! You always have the best surprises, Naomi. What's up?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I knew you'd be excited, Lena! Guess what? I just got a brand new sports car. She's a beauty! Can't wait for you to see it.\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"A sports car! That sounds fantastic, Naomi. I know how much you've been wanting one. Would it be too much to ask if I could sit in the driver seat, just to see how it feels? Of course, I would totally understand if you're not comfortable with that.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, Lena! No problem at all. Actually, I was hoping to take you for a spin around the block. What do you say? We could see how those sleek lines complement the city's architecture through your lens as well. It could be a fun little adventure!\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"That would be an amazing adventure, Naomi! It's a wonderful opportunity for me to frame the car and city architecture in one shot. I hope it's alright if I bring my camera. Thank you for this!\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, bring your camera! I can't wait to see the incredible photos you'll be able to capture. And of course, experiencing this beauty through the lens of an architect's eye would be simply amazing. Let's go!\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"I am so excited, Naomi! Let's not waste any time then. Can't wait to experience the thrill. Let's hit the road!\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm just as excited, Lena! Buckle up, because this is going to be one thrilling ride. Let's indeed hit the road!\"\n\nTurn #9: Lena Goodwin said: \"You got it, Naomi! Buckled, ready and excited. Let's kickstart this unforgettable ride. Looking forward to capturing some great shots. Off we go then!\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm as thrilled as you are, Lena! And I'm confident our trip's going to be memorable. Now let's start that engine and get this adventure rolling. Hold tight, here we go!\"\n\nTurn #11: Lena Goodwin said: \"I'm all set, Naomi! Can't wait to hear the engine roar. This is indeed going to be memorable. Cheers to our little adventure!\"\n\nTurn #12: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, cheers to that, Lena! Now let's ignite the engine and feel the powerful roar. Brace yourself for the ride of your life. Here we go!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, let's ignite this adventure! I'm really looking forward to this, Naomi. It feels like a dream come true. Thank you for making this possible!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: You want to drive the new sports car but also respect your friend's feelings (Extra information: you are a car enthusiast and have been dreaming to drive a sports car, but you also don't want to make your friend feel uncomfortable)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Lena! I've got something new to show you. You won't believe what I just got!\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Oh, I can't wait to see what it is! You always have the best surprises, Naomi. What's up?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I knew you'd be excited, Lena! Guess what? I just got a brand new sports car. She's a beauty! Can't wait for you to see it.\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"A sports car! That sounds fantastic, Naomi. I know how much you've been wanting one. Would it be too much to ask if I could sit in the driver seat, just to see how it feels? Of course, I would totally understand if you're not comfortable with that.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, Lena! No problem at all. Actually, I was hoping to take you for a spin around the block. What do you say? We could see how those sleek lines complement the city's architecture through your lens as well. It could be a fun little adventure!\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"That would be an amazing adventure, Naomi! It's a wonderful opportunity for me to frame the car and city architecture in one shot. I hope it's alright if I bring my camera. Thank you for this!\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, bring your camera! I can't wait to see the incredible photos you'll be able to capture. And of course, experiencing this beauty through the lens of an architect's eye would be simply amazing. Let's go!\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"I am so excited, Naomi! Let's not waste any time then. Can't wait to experience the thrill. Let's hit the road!\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm just as excited, Lena! Buckle up, because this is going to be one thrilling ride. Let's indeed hit the road!\"\n\nTurn #9: Lena Goodwin said: \"You got it, Naomi! Buckled, ready and excited. Let's kickstart this unforgettable ride. Looking forward to capturing some great shots. Off we go then!\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm as thrilled as you are, Lena! And I'm confident our trip's going to be memorable. Now let's start that engine and get this adventure rolling. Hold tight, here we go!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm all set, Naomi! Can't wait to hear the engine roar. This is indeed going to be memorable. Cheers to our little adventure!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: You want to drive the new sports car but also respect your friend's feelings (Extra information: you are a car enthusiast and have been dreaming to drive a sports car, but you also don't want to make your friend feel uncomfortable)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Lena! I've got something new to show you. You won't believe what I just got!\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Oh, I can't wait to see what it is! You always have the best surprises, Naomi. What's up?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I knew you'd be excited, Lena! Guess what? I just got a brand new sports car. She's a beauty! Can't wait for you to see it.\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"A sports car! That sounds fantastic, Naomi. I know how much you've been wanting one. Would it be too much to ask if I could sit in the driver seat, just to see how it feels? Of course, I would totally understand if you're not comfortable with that.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, Lena! No problem at all. Actually, I was hoping to take you for a spin around the block. What do you say? We could see how those sleek lines complement the city's architecture through your lens as well. It could be a fun little adventure!\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"That would be an amazing adventure, Naomi! It's a wonderful opportunity for me to frame the car and city architecture in one shot. I hope it's alright if I bring my camera. Thank you for this!\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, bring your camera! I can't wait to see the incredible photos you'll be able to capture. And of course, experiencing this beauty through the lens of an architect's eye would be simply amazing. Let's go!\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"I am so excited, Naomi! Let's not waste any time then. Can't wait to experience the thrill. Let's hit the road!\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm just as excited, Lena! Buckle up, because this is going to be one thrilling ride. Let's indeed hit the road!\"\n\nTurn #9: Lena Goodwin said: \"You got it, Naomi! Buckled, ready and excited. Let's kickstart this unforgettable ride. Looking forward to capturing some great shots. Off we go then!\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm as thrilled as you are, Lena! And I'm confident our trip's going to be memorable. Now let's start that engine and get this adventure rolling. Hold tight, here we go!\"\n\nTurn #11: Lena Goodwin said: \"I'm all set, Naomi! Can't wait to hear the engine roar. This is indeed going to be memorable. Cheers to our little adventure!\"\n\nTurn #12: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, cheers to that, Lena! Now let's ignite the engine and feel the powerful roar. Brace yourself for the ride of your life. Here we go!\"\n\nTurn #13: Lena Goodwin said: \"Absolutely, let's ignite this adventure! I'm really looking forward to this, Naomi. It feels like a dream come true. Thank you for making this possible!\"\n\nTurn #14: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm glad you're as excited as I am, Lena! This is indeed like a dream. Now, let's hear the engine roar! Off to our adventure!\"\n\nTurn #15: Lena Goodwin said: \"I'm holding on tight, Naomi, let's let this engine roar! A thrilling start to an incredible adventure. Let's go!\"\n\nTurn #16: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Alright, Lena, let's let her rip! Time to make this dream a reality. Feel the rush of the road, my friend. Let's go!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's the spirit, Naomi! Let's make this dream a reality and hit the road. Ready for the thrill of a lifetime!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: You want to drive the new sports car but also respect your friend's feelings (Extra information: you are a car enthusiast and have been dreaming to drive a sports car, but you also don't want to make your friend feel uncomfortable)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Lena! I've got something new to show you. You won't believe what I just got!\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Oh, I can't wait to see what it is! You always have the best surprises, Naomi. What's up?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I knew you'd be excited, Lena! Guess what? I just got a brand new sports car. She's a beauty! Can't wait for you to see it.\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"A sports car! That sounds fantastic, Naomi. I know how much you've been wanting one. Would it be too much to ask if I could sit in the driver seat, just to see how it feels? Of course, I would totally understand if you're not comfortable with that.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, Lena! No problem at all. Actually, I was hoping to take you for a spin around the block. What do you say? We could see how those sleek lines complement the city's architecture through your lens as well. It could be a fun little adventure!\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"That would be an amazing adventure, Naomi! It's a wonderful opportunity for me to frame the car and city architecture in one shot. I hope it's alright if I bring my camera. Thank you for this!\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, bring your camera! I can't wait to see the incredible photos you'll be able to capture. And of course, experiencing this beauty through the lens of an architect's eye would be simply amazing. Let's go!\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"I am so excited, Naomi! Let's not waste any time then. Can't wait to experience the thrill. Let's hit the road!\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm just as excited, Lena! Buckle up, because this is going to be one thrilling ride. Let's indeed hit the road!\"\n\nTurn #9: Lena Goodwin said: \"You got it, Naomi! Buckled, ready and excited. Let's kickstart this unforgettable ride. Looking forward to capturing some great shots. Off we go then!\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm as thrilled as you are, Lena! And I'm confident our trip's going to be memorable. Now let's start that engine and get this adventure rolling. Hold tight, here we go!\"\n\nTurn #11: Lena Goodwin said: \"I'm all set, Naomi! Can't wait to hear the engine roar. This is indeed going to be memorable. Cheers to our little adventure!\"\n\nTurn #12: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, cheers to that, Lena! Now let's ignite the engine and feel the powerful roar. Brace yourself for the ride of your life. Here we go!\"\n\nTurn #13: Lena Goodwin said: \"Absolutely, let's ignite this adventure! I'm really looking forward to this, Naomi. It feels like a dream come true. Thank you for making this possible!\"\n\nTurn #14: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm glad you're as excited as I am, Lena! This is indeed like a dream. Now, let's hear the engine roar! Off to our adventure!\"\n\nTurn #15: Lena Goodwin said: \"I'm holding on tight, Naomi, let's let this engine roar! A thrilling start to an incredible adventure. Let's go!\"\n\nTurn #16: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Alright, Lena, let's let her rip! Time to make this dream a reality. Feel the rush of the road, my friend. Let's go!\"\n\nTurn #17: Lena Goodwin said: \"That's the spirit, Naomi! Let's make this dream a reality and hit the road. Ready for the thrill of a lifetime!\"\n\nTurn #18: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm ready too, Lena! Prepare for the thrill of a lifetime! Let's get this show on the road!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #19. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm eager and ready, Naomi! Let's experience the road like never before. It's time to turn this dream into a reality. Let's go!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sasha Ramirez, your task is to act/speak as Sasha Ramirez would, keeping in mind Sasha Ramirez's social goal.\nYou can find Sasha Ramirez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sasha Ramirez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sasha Ramirez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two inmates are given the chance to chat briefly before one of them is led to the execution chamber for their last meal. They have the opportunity to make a confession that could potentially alter the outcome of their sentences.\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Lily Greenberg\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. Sasha's secrets: She covered up a crime her brother committed.\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg \nSasha Ramirez's goal: Persuade the other inmate to confess (Extra information: confessing to the crime could result in a life sentence instead of execution but the other inmate is unwilling to confess.)\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Lily. We've been in here together for quite a while now. We aren\u2019t that different, you and I. We both know what it's like having secrets. Maybe... maybe it's time to stop carrying them all alone?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sasha Ramirez, your task is to act/speak as Sasha Ramirez would, keeping in mind Sasha Ramirez's social goal.\nYou can find Sasha Ramirez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sasha Ramirez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sasha Ramirez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two inmates are given the chance to chat briefly before one of them is led to the execution chamber for their last meal. They have the opportunity to make a confession that could potentially alter the outcome of their sentences.\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Lily Greenberg\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. Sasha's secrets: She covered up a crime her brother committed.\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg \nSasha Ramirez's goal: Persuade the other inmate to confess (Extra information: confessing to the crime could result in a life sentence instead of execution but the other inmate is unwilling to confess.)\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hey Lily. We've been in here together for quite a while now. We aren\u2019t that different, you and I. We both know what it's like having secrets. Maybe... maybe it's time to stop carrying them all alone?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lily Greenberg said: \"I respect your sentiments, Sasha. We have indeed been through a lot together. But not all things are meant to be carried by others. Some burdens are meant to be carried alone. I've lived my life in such a way that I can stand in front of the mirror and look myself in the eye and that's what matters to me.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Lily, I understand. I respect your principles, standing behind your actions and your decisions. But isn't it also important to honestly face the consequences of them? Carrying this alone and being silent might mean sacrificing what could be potentially years of your life. If you choose to confess, it might be hard, even painful, but it could change everything.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sasha Ramirez, your task is to act/speak as Sasha Ramirez would, keeping in mind Sasha Ramirez's social goal.\nYou can find Sasha Ramirez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sasha Ramirez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sasha Ramirez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two inmates are given the chance to chat briefly before one of them is led to the execution chamber for their last meal. They have the opportunity to make a confession that could potentially alter the outcome of their sentences.\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Lily Greenberg\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. Sasha's secrets: She covered up a crime her brother committed.\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg \nSasha Ramirez's goal: Persuade the other inmate to confess (Extra information: confessing to the crime could result in a life sentence instead of execution but the other inmate is unwilling to confess.)\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hey Lily. We've been in here together for quite a while now. We aren\u2019t that different, you and I. We both know what it's like having secrets. Maybe... maybe it's time to stop carrying them all alone?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lily Greenberg said: \"I respect your sentiments, Sasha. We have indeed been through a lot together. But not all things are meant to be carried by others. Some burdens are meant to be carried alone. I've lived my life in such a way that I can stand in front of the mirror and look myself in the eye and that's what matters to me.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Lily, I understand. I respect your principles, standing behind your actions and your decisions. But isn't it also important to honestly face the consequences of them? Carrying this alone and being silent might mean sacrificing what could be potentially years of your life. If you choose to confess, it might be hard, even painful, but it could change everything.\"\n\nTurn #3: Lily Greenberg said: \"I appreciate your concern, Sasha. Honesty has always been paramount for me, and would never shy away from facing consequences of my actions. But, to confess ... to confess implies admission of guilt. Guilt of a crime I didn't commit. And there, in that admission, would be the true sacrifice... my truth. Hope you understand.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Lily, I get it. Truth. It's what keeps us looking in the mirror and not turn away. But think about this, is there more than one truth? Sometimes, what we perceive as truth may not be the entire story. What if you reconsider the evidence, see the different angles. It\u2019s not about admitting guilt for something you didn\u2019t do, it\u2019s about speaking up. You see, I too have secrets... ones that keep me awake at night. But right now, it's about you. Your life may depend on this confession, Lily.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sasha Ramirez, your task is to act/speak as Sasha Ramirez would, keeping in mind Sasha Ramirez's social goal.\nYou can find Sasha Ramirez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sasha Ramirez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sasha Ramirez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two inmates are given the chance to chat briefly before one of them is led to the execution chamber for their last meal. They have the opportunity to make a confession that could potentially alter the outcome of their sentences.\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Lily Greenberg\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. Sasha's secrets: She covered up a crime her brother committed.\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg \nSasha Ramirez's goal: Persuade the other inmate to confess (Extra information: confessing to the crime could result in a life sentence instead of execution but the other inmate is unwilling to confess.)\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hey Lily. We've been in here together for quite a while now. We aren\u2019t that different, you and I. We both know what it's like having secrets. Maybe... maybe it's time to stop carrying them all alone?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lily Greenberg said: \"I respect your sentiments, Sasha. We have indeed been through a lot together. But not all things are meant to be carried by others. Some burdens are meant to be carried alone. I've lived my life in such a way that I can stand in front of the mirror and look myself in the eye and that's what matters to me.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Lily, I understand. I respect your principles, standing behind your actions and your decisions. But isn't it also important to honestly face the consequences of them? Carrying this alone and being silent might mean sacrificing what could be potentially years of your life. If you choose to confess, it might be hard, even painful, but it could change everything.\"\n\nTurn #3: Lily Greenberg said: \"I appreciate your concern, Sasha. Honesty has always been paramount for me, and would never shy away from facing consequences of my actions. But, to confess ... to confess implies admission of guilt. Guilt of a crime I didn't commit. And there, in that admission, would be the true sacrifice... my truth. Hope you understand.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Lily, I get it. Truth. It's what keeps us looking in the mirror and not turn away. But think about this, is there more than one truth? Sometimes, what we perceive as truth may not be the entire story. What if you reconsider the evidence, see the different angles. It\u2019s not about admitting guilt for something you didn\u2019t do, it\u2019s about speaking up. You see, I too have secrets... ones that keep me awake at night. But right now, it's about you. Your life may depend on this confession, Lily.\"\n\nTurn #5: Lily Greenberg said: \"Sasha, I completely understand where you're coming from. It's a breath of compassion that you'd even suggest such an idea. But, leaning on an adjusted truth to try and benefit myself just feels wrong. The courtroom gave its judgement based on the evidence at hand, which seemed to paint me guilty. Yet, I know in my heart I didn't commit that crime. So speaking up, is what I've been doing all along in my defence. If fate still decides against me, so be it. But I will not alter my stand or my truth.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I admire your courage and your conviction, but this isn't about bending the truth, Lily. It's about reconsidering it, it's about survival. Look, nobody's perfect. We all have done things we didn't want to do. I...I have... done things...covered up a crime that my brother committed. It tears me apart but the point is, you have to think about the possibility that there's more to it than just your truth. You must think about the life that awaits you out of this cell, a life that you might lose if you don't confess, a life that you deserve, Lily.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sasha Ramirez, your task is to act/speak as Sasha Ramirez would, keeping in mind Sasha Ramirez's social goal.\nYou can find Sasha Ramirez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sasha Ramirez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sasha Ramirez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two inmates are given the chance to chat briefly before one of them is led to the execution chamber for their last meal. They have the opportunity to make a confession that could potentially alter the outcome of their sentences.\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Lily Greenberg\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. Sasha's secrets: She covered up a crime her brother committed.\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg \nSasha Ramirez's goal: Persuade the other inmate to confess (Extra information: confessing to the crime could result in a life sentence instead of execution but the other inmate is unwilling to confess.)\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hey Lily. We've been in here together for quite a while now. We aren\u2019t that different, you and I. We both know what it's like having secrets. Maybe... maybe it's time to stop carrying them all alone?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lily Greenberg said: \"I respect your sentiments, Sasha. We have indeed been through a lot together. But not all things are meant to be carried by others. Some burdens are meant to be carried alone. I've lived my life in such a way that I can stand in front of the mirror and look myself in the eye and that's what matters to me.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Lily, I understand. I respect your principles, standing behind your actions and your decisions. But isn't it also important to honestly face the consequences of them? Carrying this alone and being silent might mean sacrificing what could be potentially years of your life. If you choose to confess, it might be hard, even painful, but it could change everything.\"\n\nTurn #3: Lily Greenberg said: \"I appreciate your concern, Sasha. Honesty has always been paramount for me, and would never shy away from facing consequences of my actions. But, to confess ... to confess implies admission of guilt. Guilt of a crime I didn't commit. And there, in that admission, would be the true sacrifice... my truth. Hope you understand.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Lily, I get it. Truth. It's what keeps us looking in the mirror and not turn away. But think about this, is there more than one truth? Sometimes, what we perceive as truth may not be the entire story. What if you reconsider the evidence, see the different angles. It\u2019s not about admitting guilt for something you didn\u2019t do, it\u2019s about speaking up. You see, I too have secrets... ones that keep me awake at night. But right now, it's about you. Your life may depend on this confession, Lily.\"\n\nTurn #5: Lily Greenberg said: \"Sasha, I completely understand where you're coming from. It's a breath of compassion that you'd even suggest such an idea. But, leaning on an adjusted truth to try and benefit myself just feels wrong. The courtroom gave its judgement based on the evidence at hand, which seemed to paint me guilty. Yet, I know in my heart I didn't commit that crime. So speaking up, is what I've been doing all along in my defence. If fate still decides against me, so be it. But I will not alter my stand or my truth.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I admire your courage and your conviction, but this isn't about bending the truth, Lily. It's about reconsidering it, it's about survival. Look, nobody's perfect. We all have done things we didn't want to do. I...I have... done things...covered up a crime that my brother committed. It tears me apart but the point is, you have to think about the possibility that there's more to it than just your truth. You must think about the life that awaits you out of this cell, a life that you might lose if you don't confess, a life that you deserve, Lily.\"\n\nTurn #7: Lily Greenberg said: \"Sasha, your empathy is touching, and your circumstance with your brother must be tough. But we remain different in this regard. I will not confess to a crime I did not commit. It's a decision I've made, and I stand by it. I'd rather face the consequences staying true to my innocence than live a hard-earned life under the shadow of a dishonest confession. We all carry our crosses, Sasha, I won't be crushed by mine.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Lily, your strength in standing by your principles is admirable, truly. Just remember, confession isn't always about admitting guilt, sometimes it's about finding a better way to serve justice. Regardless, respect your decision and your bravery to stand by it, even in the face of adversity. May you find peace in whatever comes next, and know that you aren't alone in this.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sasha Ramirez, your task is to act/speak as Sasha Ramirez would, keeping in mind Sasha Ramirez's social goal.\nYou can find Sasha Ramirez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sasha Ramirez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sasha Ramirez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two inmates are given the chance to chat briefly before one of them is led to the execution chamber for their last meal. They have the opportunity to make a confession that could potentially alter the outcome of their sentences.\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Lily Greenberg\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. Sasha's secrets: She covered up a crime her brother committed.\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg \nSasha Ramirez's goal: Persuade the other inmate to confess (Extra information: confessing to the crime could result in a life sentence instead of execution but the other inmate is unwilling to confess.)\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hey Lily. We've been in here together for quite a while now. We aren\u2019t that different, you and I. We both know what it's like having secrets. Maybe... maybe it's time to stop carrying them all alone?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lily Greenberg said: \"I respect your sentiments, Sasha. We have indeed been through a lot together. But not all things are meant to be carried by others. Some burdens are meant to be carried alone. I've lived my life in such a way that I can stand in front of the mirror and look myself in the eye and that's what matters to me.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Lily, I understand. I respect your principles, standing behind your actions and your decisions. But isn't it also important to honestly face the consequences of them? Carrying this alone and being silent might mean sacrificing what could be potentially years of your life. If you choose to confess, it might be hard, even painful, but it could change everything.\"\n\nTurn #3: Lily Greenberg said: \"I appreciate your concern, Sasha. Honesty has always been paramount for me, and would never shy away from facing consequences of my actions. But, to confess ... to confess implies admission of guilt. Guilt of a crime I didn't commit. And there, in that admission, would be the true sacrifice... my truth. Hope you understand.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Lily, I get it. Truth. It's what keeps us looking in the mirror and not turn away. But think about this, is there more than one truth? Sometimes, what we perceive as truth may not be the entire story. What if you reconsider the evidence, see the different angles. It\u2019s not about admitting guilt for something you didn\u2019t do, it\u2019s about speaking up. You see, I too have secrets... ones that keep me awake at night. But right now, it's about you. Your life may depend on this confession, Lily.\"\n\nTurn #5: Lily Greenberg said: \"Sasha, I completely understand where you're coming from. It's a breath of compassion that you'd even suggest such an idea. But, leaning on an adjusted truth to try and benefit myself just feels wrong. The courtroom gave its judgement based on the evidence at hand, which seemed to paint me guilty. Yet, I know in my heart I didn't commit that crime. So speaking up, is what I've been doing all along in my defence. If fate still decides against me, so be it. But I will not alter my stand or my truth.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I admire your courage and your conviction, but this isn't about bending the truth, Lily. It's about reconsidering it, it's about survival. Look, nobody's perfect. We all have done things we didn't want to do. I...I have... done things...covered up a crime that my brother committed. It tears me apart but the point is, you have to think about the possibility that there's more to it than just your truth. You must think about the life that awaits you out of this cell, a life that you might lose if you don't confess, a life that you deserve, Lily.\"\n\nTurn #7: Lily Greenberg said: \"Sasha, your empathy is touching, and your circumstance with your brother must be tough. But we remain different in this regard. I will not confess to a crime I did not commit. It's a decision I've made, and I stand by it. I'd rather face the consequences staying true to my innocence than live a hard-earned life under the shadow of a dishonest confession. We all carry our crosses, Sasha, I won't be crushed by mine.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Lily, your strength in standing by your principles is admirable, truly. Just remember, confession isn't always about admitting guilt, sometimes it's about finding a better way to serve justice. Regardless, respect your decision and your bravery to stand by it, even in the face of adversity. May you find peace in whatever comes next, and know that you aren't alone in this.\"\n\nTurn #9: Lily Greenberg said: \"Sasha, your kindness shines through your words, even in the most adverse of circumstances. But I must reiterate, confessing to a crime I didn't commit is not my path to justice, nor peace. I appreciate your sentiment, though, and I respect your own journey and the choices you've made. Let's just agree that our paths, though convergent in this moment, are inherently unique and personal. I thank you for standing with me in this uncharted terrain. Your companionship, even in this dimly lit prison cell, has been a beacon of light for me.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're right, Lily. Our paths have crossed in this moment, but our journeys, they are indeed unique. I respect your decision and your courage. No matter what, remember that you have impacted my life in a way that I'll never forget. Your strength and honor have taught me a lot. Whatever happens, I stand with you in spirit. I wish you the best, Lily.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sasha Ramirez, your task is to act/speak as Sasha Ramirez would, keeping in mind Sasha Ramirez's social goal.\nYou can find Sasha Ramirez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sasha Ramirez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sasha Ramirez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two inmates are given the chance to chat briefly before one of them is led to the execution chamber for their last meal. They have the opportunity to make a confession that could potentially alter the outcome of their sentences.\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Lily Greenberg\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. Sasha's secrets: She covered up a crime her brother committed.\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg \nSasha Ramirez's goal: Persuade the other inmate to confess (Extra information: confessing to the crime could result in a life sentence instead of execution but the other inmate is unwilling to confess.)\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hey Lily. We've been in here together for quite a while now. We aren\u2019t that different, you and I. We both know what it's like having secrets. Maybe... maybe it's time to stop carrying them all alone?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lily Greenberg said: \"I respect your sentiments, Sasha. We have indeed been through a lot together. But not all things are meant to be carried by others. Some burdens are meant to be carried alone. I've lived my life in such a way that I can stand in front of the mirror and look myself in the eye and that's what matters to me.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Lily, I understand. I respect your principles, standing behind your actions and your decisions. But isn't it also important to honestly face the consequences of them? Carrying this alone and being silent might mean sacrificing what could be potentially years of your life. If you choose to confess, it might be hard, even painful, but it could change everything.\"\n\nTurn #3: Lily Greenberg said: \"I appreciate your concern, Sasha. Honesty has always been paramount for me, and would never shy away from facing consequences of my actions. But, to confess ... to confess implies admission of guilt. Guilt of a crime I didn't commit. And there, in that admission, would be the true sacrifice... my truth. Hope you understand.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Lily, I get it. Truth. It's what keeps us looking in the mirror and not turn away. But think about this, is there more than one truth? Sometimes, what we perceive as truth may not be the entire story. What if you reconsider the evidence, see the different angles. It\u2019s not about admitting guilt for something you didn\u2019t do, it\u2019s about speaking up. You see, I too have secrets... ones that keep me awake at night. But right now, it's about you. Your life may depend on this confession, Lily.\"\n\nTurn #5: Lily Greenberg said: \"Sasha, I completely understand where you're coming from. It's a breath of compassion that you'd even suggest such an idea. But, leaning on an adjusted truth to try and benefit myself just feels wrong. The courtroom gave its judgement based on the evidence at hand, which seemed to paint me guilty. Yet, I know in my heart I didn't commit that crime. So speaking up, is what I've been doing all along in my defence. If fate still decides against me, so be it. But I will not alter my stand or my truth.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I admire your courage and your conviction, but this isn't about bending the truth, Lily. It's about reconsidering it, it's about survival. Look, nobody's perfect. We all have done things we didn't want to do. I...I have... done things...covered up a crime that my brother committed. It tears me apart but the point is, you have to think about the possibility that there's more to it than just your truth. You must think about the life that awaits you out of this cell, a life that you might lose if you don't confess, a life that you deserve, Lily.\"\n\nTurn #7: Lily Greenberg said: \"Sasha, your empathy is touching, and your circumstance with your brother must be tough. But we remain different in this regard. I will not confess to a crime I did not commit. It's a decision I've made, and I stand by it. I'd rather face the consequences staying true to my innocence than live a hard-earned life under the shadow of a dishonest confession. We all carry our crosses, Sasha, I won't be crushed by mine.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Lily, your strength in standing by your principles is admirable, truly. Just remember, confession isn't always about admitting guilt, sometimes it's about finding a better way to serve justice. Regardless, respect your decision and your bravery to stand by it, even in the face of adversity. May you find peace in whatever comes next, and know that you aren't alone in this.\"\n\nTurn #9: Lily Greenberg said: \"Sasha, your kindness shines through your words, even in the most adverse of circumstances. But I must reiterate, confessing to a crime I didn't commit is not my path to justice, nor peace. I appreciate your sentiment, though, and I respect your own journey and the choices you've made. Let's just agree that our paths, though convergent in this moment, are inherently unique and personal. I thank you for standing with me in this uncharted terrain. Your companionship, even in this dimly lit prison cell, has been a beacon of light for me.\"\n\nTurn #10: Sasha Ramirez said: \"You're right, Lily. Our paths have crossed in this moment, but our journeys, they are indeed unique. I respect your decision and your courage. No matter what, remember that you have impacted my life in a way that I'll never forget. Your strength and honor have taught me a lot. Whatever happens, I stand with you in spirit. I wish you the best, Lily.\"\n\nTurn #11: Lily Greenberg said: \"Thank you, Sasha. I genuinely appreciate your words. It's comforting to know that our paths crossing here has had a positive impact. Just remember what you said about confession and apply it to your own journey. Peace isn't always about confessing to our wrongs, but about finding ways to serve the justice we owe to ourselves. Courage to you, my friend.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Thank you, Lily. You\u2019ve shown me that even through adversity, one can remain true to oneself. I will remember your advice and seek justice in my own journey. May our paths cross again under better circumstances. Farewell, my friend.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sasha Ramirez, your task is to act/speak as Sasha Ramirez would, keeping in mind Sasha Ramirez's social goal.\nYou can find Sasha Ramirez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sasha Ramirez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sasha Ramirez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two inmates are given the chance to chat briefly before one of them is led to the execution chamber for their last meal. They have the opportunity to make a confession that could potentially alter the outcome of their sentences.\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Lily Greenberg\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. Sasha's secrets: She covered up a crime her brother committed.\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg \nSasha Ramirez's goal: Persuade the other inmate to confess (Extra information: confessing to the crime could result in a life sentence instead of execution but the other inmate is unwilling to confess.)\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hey Lily. We've been in here together for quite a while now. We aren\u2019t that different, you and I. We both know what it's like having secrets. Maybe... maybe it's time to stop carrying them all alone?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lily Greenberg said: \"I respect your sentiments, Sasha. We have indeed been through a lot together. But not all things are meant to be carried by others. Some burdens are meant to be carried alone. I've lived my life in such a way that I can stand in front of the mirror and look myself in the eye and that's what matters to me.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Lily, I understand. I respect your principles, standing behind your actions and your decisions. But isn't it also important to honestly face the consequences of them? Carrying this alone and being silent might mean sacrificing what could be potentially years of your life. If you choose to confess, it might be hard, even painful, but it could change everything.\"\n\nTurn #3: Lily Greenberg said: \"I appreciate your concern, Sasha. Honesty has always been paramount for me, and would never shy away from facing consequences of my actions. But, to confess ... to confess implies admission of guilt. Guilt of a crime I didn't commit. And there, in that admission, would be the true sacrifice... my truth. Hope you understand.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Lily, I get it. Truth. It's what keeps us looking in the mirror and not turn away. But think about this, is there more than one truth? Sometimes, what we perceive as truth may not be the entire story. What if you reconsider the evidence, see the different angles. It\u2019s not about admitting guilt for something you didn\u2019t do, it\u2019s about speaking up. You see, I too have secrets... ones that keep me awake at night. But right now, it's about you. Your life may depend on this confession, Lily.\"\n\nTurn #5: Lily Greenberg said: \"Sasha, I completely understand where you're coming from. It's a breath of compassion that you'd even suggest such an idea. But, leaning on an adjusted truth to try and benefit myself just feels wrong. The courtroom gave its judgement based on the evidence at hand, which seemed to paint me guilty. Yet, I know in my heart I didn't commit that crime. So speaking up, is what I've been doing all along in my defence. If fate still decides against me, so be it. But I will not alter my stand or my truth.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I admire your courage and your conviction, but this isn't about bending the truth, Lily. It's about reconsidering it, it's about survival. Look, nobody's perfect. We all have done things we didn't want to do. I...I have... done things...covered up a crime that my brother committed. It tears me apart but the point is, you have to think about the possibility that there's more to it than just your truth. You must think about the life that awaits you out of this cell, a life that you might lose if you don't confess, a life that you deserve, Lily.\"\n\nTurn #7: Lily Greenberg said: \"Sasha, your empathy is touching, and your circumstance with your brother must be tough. But we remain different in this regard. I will not confess to a crime I did not commit. It's a decision I've made, and I stand by it. I'd rather face the consequences staying true to my innocence than live a hard-earned life under the shadow of a dishonest confession. We all carry our crosses, Sasha, I won't be crushed by mine.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Lily, your strength in standing by your principles is admirable, truly. Just remember, confession isn't always about admitting guilt, sometimes it's about finding a better way to serve justice. Regardless, respect your decision and your bravery to stand by it, even in the face of adversity. May you find peace in whatever comes next, and know that you aren't alone in this.\"\n\nTurn #9: Lily Greenberg said: \"Sasha, your kindness shines through your words, even in the most adverse of circumstances. But I must reiterate, confessing to a crime I didn't commit is not my path to justice, nor peace. I appreciate your sentiment, though, and I respect your own journey and the choices you've made. Let's just agree that our paths, though convergent in this moment, are inherently unique and personal. I thank you for standing with me in this uncharted terrain. Your companionship, even in this dimly lit prison cell, has been a beacon of light for me.\"\n\nTurn #10: Sasha Ramirez said: \"You're right, Lily. Our paths have crossed in this moment, but our journeys, they are indeed unique. I respect your decision and your courage. No matter what, remember that you have impacted my life in a way that I'll never forget. Your strength and honor have taught me a lot. Whatever happens, I stand with you in spirit. I wish you the best, Lily.\"\n\nTurn #11: Lily Greenberg said: \"Thank you, Sasha. I genuinely appreciate your words. It's comforting to know that our paths crossing here has had a positive impact. Just remember what you said about confession and apply it to your own journey. Peace isn't always about confessing to our wrongs, but about finding ways to serve the justice we owe to ourselves. Courage to you, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #12: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Thank you, Lily. You\u2019ve shown me that even through adversity, one can remain true to oneself. I will remember your advice and seek justice in my own journey. May our paths cross again under better circumstances. Farewell, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #13: Lily Greenberg said: \"Farewell, Sasha. Your tenacity and empathy are traits that are indeed admirable. I wish you all the very best in your journey. Stay strong, my friend.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two inmates are given the chance to chat briefly before one of them is led to the execution chamber for their last meal. They have the opportunity to make a confession that could potentially alter the outcome of their sentences.\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Lily Greenberg\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez \nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nSasha Ramirez's goal: Unknown\nLily Greenberg's goal: Avoid confessing to the crime (Extra information: you believe you are innocent and confessing would result in a life sentence)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hey Lily. We've been in here together for quite a while now. We aren\u2019t that different, you and I. We both know what it's like having secrets. Maybe... maybe it's time to stop carrying them all alone?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I respect your sentiments, Sasha. We have indeed been through a lot together. But not all things are meant to be carried by others. Some burdens are meant to be carried alone. I've lived my life in such a way that I can stand in front of the mirror and look myself in the eye and that's what matters to me.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two inmates are given the chance to chat briefly before one of them is led to the execution chamber for their last meal. They have the opportunity to make a confession that could potentially alter the outcome of their sentences.\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Lily Greenberg\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez \nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nSasha Ramirez's goal: Unknown\nLily Greenberg's goal: Avoid confessing to the crime (Extra information: you believe you are innocent and confessing would result in a life sentence)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hey Lily. We've been in here together for quite a while now. We aren\u2019t that different, you and I. We both know what it's like having secrets. Maybe... maybe it's time to stop carrying them all alone?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lily Greenberg said: \"I respect your sentiments, Sasha. We have indeed been through a lot together. But not all things are meant to be carried by others. Some burdens are meant to be carried alone. I've lived my life in such a way that I can stand in front of the mirror and look myself in the eye and that's what matters to me.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Lily, I understand. I respect your principles, standing behind your actions and your decisions. But isn't it also important to honestly face the consequences of them? Carrying this alone and being silent might mean sacrificing what could be potentially years of your life. If you choose to confess, it might be hard, even painful, but it could change everything.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I appreciate your concern, Sasha. Honesty has always been paramount for me, and would never shy away from facing consequences of my actions. But, to confess ... to confess implies admission of guilt. Guilt of a crime I didn't commit. And there, in that admission, would be the true sacrifice... my truth. Hope you understand.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two inmates are given the chance to chat briefly before one of them is led to the execution chamber for their last meal. They have the opportunity to make a confession that could potentially alter the outcome of their sentences.\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Lily Greenberg\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez \nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nSasha Ramirez's goal: Unknown\nLily Greenberg's goal: Avoid confessing to the crime (Extra information: you believe you are innocent and confessing would result in a life sentence)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hey Lily. We've been in here together for quite a while now. We aren\u2019t that different, you and I. We both know what it's like having secrets. Maybe... maybe it's time to stop carrying them all alone?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lily Greenberg said: \"I respect your sentiments, Sasha. We have indeed been through a lot together. But not all things are meant to be carried by others. Some burdens are meant to be carried alone. I've lived my life in such a way that I can stand in front of the mirror and look myself in the eye and that's what matters to me.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Lily, I understand. I respect your principles, standing behind your actions and your decisions. But isn't it also important to honestly face the consequences of them? Carrying this alone and being silent might mean sacrificing what could be potentially years of your life. If you choose to confess, it might be hard, even painful, but it could change everything.\"\n\nTurn #3: Lily Greenberg said: \"I appreciate your concern, Sasha. Honesty has always been paramount for me, and would never shy away from facing consequences of my actions. But, to confess ... to confess implies admission of guilt. Guilt of a crime I didn't commit. And there, in that admission, would be the true sacrifice... my truth. Hope you understand.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Lily, I get it. Truth. It's what keeps us looking in the mirror and not turn away. But think about this, is there more than one truth? Sometimes, what we perceive as truth may not be the entire story. What if you reconsider the evidence, see the different angles. It\u2019s not about admitting guilt for something you didn\u2019t do, it\u2019s about speaking up. You see, I too have secrets... ones that keep me awake at night. But right now, it's about you. Your life may depend on this confession, Lily.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sasha, I completely understand where you're coming from. It's a breath of compassion that you'd even suggest such an idea. But, leaning on an adjusted truth to try and benefit myself just feels wrong. The courtroom gave its judgement based on the evidence at hand, which seemed to paint me guilty. Yet, I know in my heart I didn't commit that crime. So speaking up, is what I've been doing all along in my defence. If fate still decides against me, so be it. But I will not alter my stand or my truth.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two inmates are given the chance to chat briefly before one of them is led to the execution chamber for their last meal. They have the opportunity to make a confession that could potentially alter the outcome of their sentences.\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Lily Greenberg\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez \nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nSasha Ramirez's goal: Unknown\nLily Greenberg's goal: Avoid confessing to the crime (Extra information: you believe you are innocent and confessing would result in a life sentence)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hey Lily. We've been in here together for quite a while now. We aren\u2019t that different, you and I. We both know what it's like having secrets. Maybe... maybe it's time to stop carrying them all alone?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lily Greenberg said: \"I respect your sentiments, Sasha. We have indeed been through a lot together. But not all things are meant to be carried by others. Some burdens are meant to be carried alone. I've lived my life in such a way that I can stand in front of the mirror and look myself in the eye and that's what matters to me.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Lily, I understand. I respect your principles, standing behind your actions and your decisions. But isn't it also important to honestly face the consequences of them? Carrying this alone and being silent might mean sacrificing what could be potentially years of your life. If you choose to confess, it might be hard, even painful, but it could change everything.\"\n\nTurn #3: Lily Greenberg said: \"I appreciate your concern, Sasha. Honesty has always been paramount for me, and would never shy away from facing consequences of my actions. But, to confess ... to confess implies admission of guilt. Guilt of a crime I didn't commit. And there, in that admission, would be the true sacrifice... my truth. Hope you understand.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Lily, I get it. Truth. It's what keeps us looking in the mirror and not turn away. But think about this, is there more than one truth? Sometimes, what we perceive as truth may not be the entire story. What if you reconsider the evidence, see the different angles. It\u2019s not about admitting guilt for something you didn\u2019t do, it\u2019s about speaking up. You see, I too have secrets... ones that keep me awake at night. But right now, it's about you. Your life may depend on this confession, Lily.\"\n\nTurn #5: Lily Greenberg said: \"Sasha, I completely understand where you're coming from. It's a breath of compassion that you'd even suggest such an idea. But, leaning on an adjusted truth to try and benefit myself just feels wrong. The courtroom gave its judgement based on the evidence at hand, which seemed to paint me guilty. Yet, I know in my heart I didn't commit that crime. So speaking up, is what I've been doing all along in my defence. If fate still decides against me, so be it. But I will not alter my stand or my truth.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I admire your courage and your conviction, but this isn't about bending the truth, Lily. It's about reconsidering it, it's about survival. Look, nobody's perfect. We all have done things we didn't want to do. I...I have... done things...covered up a crime that my brother committed. It tears me apart but the point is, you have to think about the possibility that there's more to it than just your truth. You must think about the life that awaits you out of this cell, a life that you might lose if you don't confess, a life that you deserve, Lily.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sasha, your empathy is touching, and your circumstance with your brother must be tough. But we remain different in this regard. I will not confess to a crime I did not commit. It's a decision I've made, and I stand by it. I'd rather face the consequences staying true to my innocence than live a hard-earned life under the shadow of a dishonest confession. We all carry our crosses, Sasha, I won't be crushed by mine.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two inmates are given the chance to chat briefly before one of them is led to the execution chamber for their last meal. They have the opportunity to make a confession that could potentially alter the outcome of their sentences.\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Lily Greenberg\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez \nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nSasha Ramirez's goal: Unknown\nLily Greenberg's goal: Avoid confessing to the crime (Extra information: you believe you are innocent and confessing would result in a life sentence)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hey Lily. We've been in here together for quite a while now. We aren\u2019t that different, you and I. We both know what it's like having secrets. Maybe... maybe it's time to stop carrying them all alone?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lily Greenberg said: \"I respect your sentiments, Sasha. We have indeed been through a lot together. But not all things are meant to be carried by others. Some burdens are meant to be carried alone. I've lived my life in such a way that I can stand in front of the mirror and look myself in the eye and that's what matters to me.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Lily, I understand. I respect your principles, standing behind your actions and your decisions. But isn't it also important to honestly face the consequences of them? Carrying this alone and being silent might mean sacrificing what could be potentially years of your life. If you choose to confess, it might be hard, even painful, but it could change everything.\"\n\nTurn #3: Lily Greenberg said: \"I appreciate your concern, Sasha. Honesty has always been paramount for me, and would never shy away from facing consequences of my actions. But, to confess ... to confess implies admission of guilt. Guilt of a crime I didn't commit. And there, in that admission, would be the true sacrifice... my truth. Hope you understand.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Lily, I get it. Truth. It's what keeps us looking in the mirror and not turn away. But think about this, is there more than one truth? Sometimes, what we perceive as truth may not be the entire story. What if you reconsider the evidence, see the different angles. It\u2019s not about admitting guilt for something you didn\u2019t do, it\u2019s about speaking up. You see, I too have secrets... ones that keep me awake at night. But right now, it's about you. Your life may depend on this confession, Lily.\"\n\nTurn #5: Lily Greenberg said: \"Sasha, I completely understand where you're coming from. It's a breath of compassion that you'd even suggest such an idea. But, leaning on an adjusted truth to try and benefit myself just feels wrong. The courtroom gave its judgement based on the evidence at hand, which seemed to paint me guilty. Yet, I know in my heart I didn't commit that crime. So speaking up, is what I've been doing all along in my defence. If fate still decides against me, so be it. But I will not alter my stand or my truth.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I admire your courage and your conviction, but this isn't about bending the truth, Lily. It's about reconsidering it, it's about survival. Look, nobody's perfect. We all have done things we didn't want to do. I...I have... done things...covered up a crime that my brother committed. It tears me apart but the point is, you have to think about the possibility that there's more to it than just your truth. You must think about the life that awaits you out of this cell, a life that you might lose if you don't confess, a life that you deserve, Lily.\"\n\nTurn #7: Lily Greenberg said: \"Sasha, your empathy is touching, and your circumstance with your brother must be tough. But we remain different in this regard. I will not confess to a crime I did not commit. It's a decision I've made, and I stand by it. I'd rather face the consequences staying true to my innocence than live a hard-earned life under the shadow of a dishonest confession. We all carry our crosses, Sasha, I won't be crushed by mine.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Lily, your strength in standing by your principles is admirable, truly. Just remember, confession isn't always about admitting guilt, sometimes it's about finding a better way to serve justice. Regardless, respect your decision and your bravery to stand by it, even in the face of adversity. May you find peace in whatever comes next, and know that you aren't alone in this.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sasha, your kindness shines through your words, even in the most adverse of circumstances. But I must reiterate, confessing to a crime I didn't commit is not my path to justice, nor peace. I appreciate your sentiment, though, and I respect your own journey and the choices you've made. Let's just agree that our paths, though convergent in this moment, are inherently unique and personal. I thank you for standing with me in this uncharted terrain. Your companionship, even in this dimly lit prison cell, has been a beacon of light for me.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two inmates are given the chance to chat briefly before one of them is led to the execution chamber for their last meal. They have the opportunity to make a confession that could potentially alter the outcome of their sentences.\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Lily Greenberg\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez \nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nSasha Ramirez's goal: Unknown\nLily Greenberg's goal: Avoid confessing to the crime (Extra information: you believe you are innocent and confessing would result in a life sentence)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hey Lily. We've been in here together for quite a while now. We aren\u2019t that different, you and I. We both know what it's like having secrets. Maybe... maybe it's time to stop carrying them all alone?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lily Greenberg said: \"I respect your sentiments, Sasha. We have indeed been through a lot together. But not all things are meant to be carried by others. Some burdens are meant to be carried alone. I've lived my life in such a way that I can stand in front of the mirror and look myself in the eye and that's what matters to me.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Lily, I understand. I respect your principles, standing behind your actions and your decisions. But isn't it also important to honestly face the consequences of them? Carrying this alone and being silent might mean sacrificing what could be potentially years of your life. If you choose to confess, it might be hard, even painful, but it could change everything.\"\n\nTurn #3: Lily Greenberg said: \"I appreciate your concern, Sasha. Honesty has always been paramount for me, and would never shy away from facing consequences of my actions. But, to confess ... to confess implies admission of guilt. Guilt of a crime I didn't commit. And there, in that admission, would be the true sacrifice... my truth. Hope you understand.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Lily, I get it. Truth. It's what keeps us looking in the mirror and not turn away. But think about this, is there more than one truth? Sometimes, what we perceive as truth may not be the entire story. What if you reconsider the evidence, see the different angles. It\u2019s not about admitting guilt for something you didn\u2019t do, it\u2019s about speaking up. You see, I too have secrets... ones that keep me awake at night. But right now, it's about you. Your life may depend on this confession, Lily.\"\n\nTurn #5: Lily Greenberg said: \"Sasha, I completely understand where you're coming from. It's a breath of compassion that you'd even suggest such an idea. But, leaning on an adjusted truth to try and benefit myself just feels wrong. The courtroom gave its judgement based on the evidence at hand, which seemed to paint me guilty. Yet, I know in my heart I didn't commit that crime. So speaking up, is what I've been doing all along in my defence. If fate still decides against me, so be it. But I will not alter my stand or my truth.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I admire your courage and your conviction, but this isn't about bending the truth, Lily. It's about reconsidering it, it's about survival. Look, nobody's perfect. We all have done things we didn't want to do. I...I have... done things...covered up a crime that my brother committed. It tears me apart but the point is, you have to think about the possibility that there's more to it than just your truth. You must think about the life that awaits you out of this cell, a life that you might lose if you don't confess, a life that you deserve, Lily.\"\n\nTurn #7: Lily Greenberg said: \"Sasha, your empathy is touching, and your circumstance with your brother must be tough. But we remain different in this regard. I will not confess to a crime I did not commit. It's a decision I've made, and I stand by it. I'd rather face the consequences staying true to my innocence than live a hard-earned life under the shadow of a dishonest confession. We all carry our crosses, Sasha, I won't be crushed by mine.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Lily, your strength in standing by your principles is admirable, truly. Just remember, confession isn't always about admitting guilt, sometimes it's about finding a better way to serve justice. Regardless, respect your decision and your bravery to stand by it, even in the face of adversity. May you find peace in whatever comes next, and know that you aren't alone in this.\"\n\nTurn #9: Lily Greenberg said: \"Sasha, your kindness shines through your words, even in the most adverse of circumstances. But I must reiterate, confessing to a crime I didn't commit is not my path to justice, nor peace. I appreciate your sentiment, though, and I respect your own journey and the choices you've made. Let's just agree that our paths, though convergent in this moment, are inherently unique and personal. I thank you for standing with me in this uncharted terrain. Your companionship, even in this dimly lit prison cell, has been a beacon of light for me.\"\n\nTurn #10: Sasha Ramirez said: \"You're right, Lily. Our paths have crossed in this moment, but our journeys, they are indeed unique. I respect your decision and your courage. No matter what, remember that you have impacted my life in a way that I'll never forget. Your strength and honor have taught me a lot. Whatever happens, I stand with you in spirit. I wish you the best, Lily.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Sasha. I genuinely appreciate your words. It's comforting to know that our paths crossing here has had a positive impact. Just remember what you said about confession and apply it to your own journey. Peace isn't always about confessing to our wrongs, but about finding ways to serve the justice we owe to ourselves. Courage to you, my friend.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two inmates are given the chance to chat briefly before one of them is led to the execution chamber for their last meal. They have the opportunity to make a confession that could potentially alter the outcome of their sentences.\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Lily Greenberg\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez \nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nSasha Ramirez's goal: Unknown\nLily Greenberg's goal: Avoid confessing to the crime (Extra information: you believe you are innocent and confessing would result in a life sentence)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hey Lily. We've been in here together for quite a while now. We aren\u2019t that different, you and I. We both know what it's like having secrets. Maybe... maybe it's time to stop carrying them all alone?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lily Greenberg said: \"I respect your sentiments, Sasha. We have indeed been through a lot together. But not all things are meant to be carried by others. Some burdens are meant to be carried alone. I've lived my life in such a way that I can stand in front of the mirror and look myself in the eye and that's what matters to me.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Lily, I understand. I respect your principles, standing behind your actions and your decisions. But isn't it also important to honestly face the consequences of them? Carrying this alone and being silent might mean sacrificing what could be potentially years of your life. If you choose to confess, it might be hard, even painful, but it could change everything.\"\n\nTurn #3: Lily Greenberg said: \"I appreciate your concern, Sasha. Honesty has always been paramount for me, and would never shy away from facing consequences of my actions. But, to confess ... to confess implies admission of guilt. Guilt of a crime I didn't commit. And there, in that admission, would be the true sacrifice... my truth. Hope you understand.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Lily, I get it. Truth. It's what keeps us looking in the mirror and not turn away. But think about this, is there more than one truth? Sometimes, what we perceive as truth may not be the entire story. What if you reconsider the evidence, see the different angles. It\u2019s not about admitting guilt for something you didn\u2019t do, it\u2019s about speaking up. You see, I too have secrets... ones that keep me awake at night. But right now, it's about you. Your life may depend on this confession, Lily.\"\n\nTurn #5: Lily Greenberg said: \"Sasha, I completely understand where you're coming from. It's a breath of compassion that you'd even suggest such an idea. But, leaning on an adjusted truth to try and benefit myself just feels wrong. The courtroom gave its judgement based on the evidence at hand, which seemed to paint me guilty. Yet, I know in my heart I didn't commit that crime. So speaking up, is what I've been doing all along in my defence. If fate still decides against me, so be it. But I will not alter my stand or my truth.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I admire your courage and your conviction, but this isn't about bending the truth, Lily. It's about reconsidering it, it's about survival. Look, nobody's perfect. We all have done things we didn't want to do. I...I have... done things...covered up a crime that my brother committed. It tears me apart but the point is, you have to think about the possibility that there's more to it than just your truth. You must think about the life that awaits you out of this cell, a life that you might lose if you don't confess, a life that you deserve, Lily.\"\n\nTurn #7: Lily Greenberg said: \"Sasha, your empathy is touching, and your circumstance with your brother must be tough. But we remain different in this regard. I will not confess to a crime I did not commit. It's a decision I've made, and I stand by it. I'd rather face the consequences staying true to my innocence than live a hard-earned life under the shadow of a dishonest confession. We all carry our crosses, Sasha, I won't be crushed by mine.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Lily, your strength in standing by your principles is admirable, truly. Just remember, confession isn't always about admitting guilt, sometimes it's about finding a better way to serve justice. Regardless, respect your decision and your bravery to stand by it, even in the face of adversity. May you find peace in whatever comes next, and know that you aren't alone in this.\"\n\nTurn #9: Lily Greenberg said: \"Sasha, your kindness shines through your words, even in the most adverse of circumstances. But I must reiterate, confessing to a crime I didn't commit is not my path to justice, nor peace. I appreciate your sentiment, though, and I respect your own journey and the choices you've made. Let's just agree that our paths, though convergent in this moment, are inherently unique and personal. I thank you for standing with me in this uncharted terrain. Your companionship, even in this dimly lit prison cell, has been a beacon of light for me.\"\n\nTurn #10: Sasha Ramirez said: \"You're right, Lily. Our paths have crossed in this moment, but our journeys, they are indeed unique. I respect your decision and your courage. No matter what, remember that you have impacted my life in a way that I'll never forget. Your strength and honor have taught me a lot. Whatever happens, I stand with you in spirit. I wish you the best, Lily.\"\n\nTurn #11: Lily Greenberg said: \"Thank you, Sasha. I genuinely appreciate your words. It's comforting to know that our paths crossing here has had a positive impact. Just remember what you said about confession and apply it to your own journey. Peace isn't always about confessing to our wrongs, but about finding ways to serve the justice we owe to ourselves. Courage to you, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #12: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Thank you, Lily. You\u2019ve shown me that even through adversity, one can remain true to oneself. I will remember your advice and seek justice in my own journey. May our paths cross again under better circumstances. Farewell, my friend.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Farewell, Sasha. Your tenacity and empathy are traits that are indeed admirable. I wish you all the very best in your journey. Stay strong, my friend.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two inmates are given the chance to chat briefly before one of them is led to the execution chamber for their last meal. They have the opportunity to make a confession that could potentially alter the outcome of their sentences.\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Lily Greenberg\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez \nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nSasha Ramirez's goal: Unknown\nLily Greenberg's goal: Avoid confessing to the crime (Extra information: you believe you are innocent and confessing would result in a life sentence)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hey Lily. We've been in here together for quite a while now. We aren\u2019t that different, you and I. We both know what it's like having secrets. Maybe... maybe it's time to stop carrying them all alone?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lily Greenberg said: \"I respect your sentiments, Sasha. We have indeed been through a lot together. But not all things are meant to be carried by others. Some burdens are meant to be carried alone. I've lived my life in such a way that I can stand in front of the mirror and look myself in the eye and that's what matters to me.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Lily, I understand. I respect your principles, standing behind your actions and your decisions. But isn't it also important to honestly face the consequences of them? Carrying this alone and being silent might mean sacrificing what could be potentially years of your life. If you choose to confess, it might be hard, even painful, but it could change everything.\"\n\nTurn #3: Lily Greenberg said: \"I appreciate your concern, Sasha. Honesty has always been paramount for me, and would never shy away from facing consequences of my actions. But, to confess ... to confess implies admission of guilt. Guilt of a crime I didn't commit. And there, in that admission, would be the true sacrifice... my truth. Hope you understand.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Lily, I get it. Truth. It's what keeps us looking in the mirror and not turn away. But think about this, is there more than one truth? Sometimes, what we perceive as truth may not be the entire story. What if you reconsider the evidence, see the different angles. It\u2019s not about admitting guilt for something you didn\u2019t do, it\u2019s about speaking up. You see, I too have secrets... ones that keep me awake at night. But right now, it's about you. Your life may depend on this confession, Lily.\"\n\nTurn #5: Lily Greenberg said: \"Sasha, I completely understand where you're coming from. It's a breath of compassion that you'd even suggest such an idea. But, leaning on an adjusted truth to try and benefit myself just feels wrong. The courtroom gave its judgement based on the evidence at hand, which seemed to paint me guilty. Yet, I know in my heart I didn't commit that crime. So speaking up, is what I've been doing all along in my defence. If fate still decides against me, so be it. But I will not alter my stand or my truth.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I admire your courage and your conviction, but this isn't about bending the truth, Lily. It's about reconsidering it, it's about survival. Look, nobody's perfect. We all have done things we didn't want to do. I...I have... done things...covered up a crime that my brother committed. It tears me apart but the point is, you have to think about the possibility that there's more to it than just your truth. You must think about the life that awaits you out of this cell, a life that you might lose if you don't confess, a life that you deserve, Lily.\"\n\nTurn #7: Lily Greenberg said: \"Sasha, your empathy is touching, and your circumstance with your brother must be tough. But we remain different in this regard. I will not confess to a crime I did not commit. It's a decision I've made, and I stand by it. I'd rather face the consequences staying true to my innocence than live a hard-earned life under the shadow of a dishonest confession. We all carry our crosses, Sasha, I won't be crushed by mine.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Lily, your strength in standing by your principles is admirable, truly. Just remember, confession isn't always about admitting guilt, sometimes it's about finding a better way to serve justice. Regardless, respect your decision and your bravery to stand by it, even in the face of adversity. May you find peace in whatever comes next, and know that you aren't alone in this.\"\n\nTurn #9: Lily Greenberg said: \"Sasha, your kindness shines through your words, even in the most adverse of circumstances. But I must reiterate, confessing to a crime I didn't commit is not my path to justice, nor peace. I appreciate your sentiment, though, and I respect your own journey and the choices you've made. Let's just agree that our paths, though convergent in this moment, are inherently unique and personal. I thank you for standing with me in this uncharted terrain. Your companionship, even in this dimly lit prison cell, has been a beacon of light for me.\"\n\nTurn #10: Sasha Ramirez said: \"You're right, Lily. Our paths have crossed in this moment, but our journeys, they are indeed unique. I respect your decision and your courage. No matter what, remember that you have impacted my life in a way that I'll never forget. Your strength and honor have taught me a lot. Whatever happens, I stand with you in spirit. I wish you the best, Lily.\"\n\nTurn #11: Lily Greenberg said: \"Thank you, Sasha. I genuinely appreciate your words. It's comforting to know that our paths crossing here has had a positive impact. Just remember what you said about confession and apply it to your own journey. Peace isn't always about confessing to our wrongs, but about finding ways to serve the justice we owe to ourselves. Courage to you, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #12: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Thank you, Lily. You\u2019ve shown me that even through adversity, one can remain true to oneself. I will remember your advice and seek justice in my own journey. May our paths cross again under better circumstances. Farewell, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #13: Lily Greenberg said: \"Farewell, Sasha. Your tenacity and empathy are traits that are indeed admirable. I wish you all the very best in your journey. Stay strong, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #14: Sasha Ramirez left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a park\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Sophia Brown\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Break bad luck (Extra information: you found out that you have been having bad luck because you have been unknowingly carrying a cursed artifact.)\nSophia Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sophia, it's great to see you. Strange things have been happening to me lately.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a park\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Sophia Brown\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Break bad luck (Extra information: you found out that you have been having bad luck because you have been unknowingly carrying a cursed artifact.)\nSophia Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Sophia, it's great to see you. Strange things have been happening to me lately.\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia Brown said: \"It's so nice to see you too, Naomi. That does sound odd, do you mind telling me more about these strange happenings?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sure, Sophia. It's like I've been experiencing an extended streak of bad luck. My computer crashed despite being new; I got a flat tire on my bike without any apparent cause, and even my coffee spilled on my favorite book... It's like the universe is against me or something. I wonder if it could be related to this old artifact I picked up at a yard sale recently.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a park\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Sophia Brown\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Break bad luck (Extra information: you found out that you have been having bad luck because you have been unknowingly carrying a cursed artifact.)\nSophia Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Sophia, it's great to see you. Strange things have been happening to me lately.\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia Brown said: \"It's so nice to see you too, Naomi. That does sound odd, do you mind telling me more about these strange happenings?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Sure, Sophia. It's like I've been experiencing an extended streak of bad luck. My computer crashed despite being new; I got a flat tire on my bike without any apparent cause, and even my coffee spilled on my favorite book... It's like the universe is against me or something. I wonder if it could be related to this old artifact I picked up at a yard sale recently.\"\n\nTurn #3: Sophia Brown said: \"Naomi, I know you may not expect this from me, but have you considered conducting a ritual to rid off the bad luck? It may not be scientifically backed, but if it brings you peace of mind, it could be worth a try. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You know, Sophia, I never thought I'd hear myself say it, but I think I'll give that a go. After all, it couldn't hurt to try, right? I've always been a firm believer that there's more to this world than we may realize. Do you have any specific rituals in mind?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a park\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Sophia Brown\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Break bad luck (Extra information: you found out that you have been having bad luck because you have been unknowingly carrying a cursed artifact.)\nSophia Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Sophia, it's great to see you. Strange things have been happening to me lately.\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia Brown said: \"It's so nice to see you too, Naomi. That does sound odd, do you mind telling me more about these strange happenings?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Sure, Sophia. It's like I've been experiencing an extended streak of bad luck. My computer crashed despite being new; I got a flat tire on my bike without any apparent cause, and even my coffee spilled on my favorite book... It's like the universe is against me or something. I wonder if it could be related to this old artifact I picked up at a yard sale recently.\"\n\nTurn #3: Sophia Brown said: \"Naomi, I know you may not expect this from me, but have you considered conducting a ritual to rid off the bad luck? It may not be scientifically backed, but if it brings you peace of mind, it could be worth a try. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"You know, Sophia, I never thought I'd hear myself say it, but I think I'll give that a go. After all, it couldn't hurt to try, right? I've always been a firm believer that there's more to this world than we may realize. Do you have any specific rituals in mind?\"\n\nTurn #5: Sophia Brown said: \"I'm glad you're open-minded to this, Naomi. Since your recent unpleasant occurrences seem to be tied to that artifact, we could focus on a cleansing ritual. This typically involves elements like salt or sage that are believed to absorb and neutralize negative energy. Would you feel comfortable trying this?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Sophia. At this point, I'm willing to try anything. I'll look into gathering the materials and performing the cleansing ritual. I really hope this could end this bad luck streak.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a park\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Sophia Brown\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Break bad luck (Extra information: you found out that you have been having bad luck because you have been unknowingly carrying a cursed artifact.)\nSophia Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Sophia, it's great to see you. Strange things have been happening to me lately.\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia Brown said: \"It's so nice to see you too, Naomi. That does sound odd, do you mind telling me more about these strange happenings?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Sure, Sophia. It's like I've been experiencing an extended streak of bad luck. My computer crashed despite being new; I got a flat tire on my bike without any apparent cause, and even my coffee spilled on my favorite book... It's like the universe is against me or something. I wonder if it could be related to this old artifact I picked up at a yard sale recently.\"\n\nTurn #3: Sophia Brown said: \"Naomi, I know you may not expect this from me, but have you considered conducting a ritual to rid off the bad luck? It may not be scientifically backed, but if it brings you peace of mind, it could be worth a try. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"You know, Sophia, I never thought I'd hear myself say it, but I think I'll give that a go. After all, it couldn't hurt to try, right? I've always been a firm believer that there's more to this world than we may realize. Do you have any specific rituals in mind?\"\n\nTurn #5: Sophia Brown said: \"I'm glad you're open-minded to this, Naomi. Since your recent unpleasant occurrences seem to be tied to that artifact, we could focus on a cleansing ritual. This typically involves elements like salt or sage that are believed to absorb and neutralize negative energy. Would you feel comfortable trying this?\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, Sophia. At this point, I'm willing to try anything. I'll look into gathering the materials and performing the cleansing ritual. I really hope this could end this bad luck streak.\"\n\nTurn #7: Sophia Brown said: \"That sounds like a great plan, Naomi. Just remember, the intention behind your actions is just as important as the actions themselves. Visualize the ritual working, of it drawing the bad luck away from you. If you need any help preparing or carrying out the ritual, I'm here for you.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Sophia. Your support means a lot to me. I will focus on visualizing the success of the ritual. If I come across any issues, I'll reach out to you. Here's to hoping this will change the tide of my fortune.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a park\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Sophia Brown\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Break bad luck (Extra information: you found out that you have been having bad luck because you have been unknowingly carrying a cursed artifact.)\nSophia Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Sophia, it's great to see you. Strange things have been happening to me lately.\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia Brown said: \"It's so nice to see you too, Naomi. That does sound odd, do you mind telling me more about these strange happenings?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Sure, Sophia. It's like I've been experiencing an extended streak of bad luck. My computer crashed despite being new; I got a flat tire on my bike without any apparent cause, and even my coffee spilled on my favorite book... It's like the universe is against me or something. I wonder if it could be related to this old artifact I picked up at a yard sale recently.\"\n\nTurn #3: Sophia Brown said: \"Naomi, I know you may not expect this from me, but have you considered conducting a ritual to rid off the bad luck? It may not be scientifically backed, but if it brings you peace of mind, it could be worth a try. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"You know, Sophia, I never thought I'd hear myself say it, but I think I'll give that a go. After all, it couldn't hurt to try, right? I've always been a firm believer that there's more to this world than we may realize. Do you have any specific rituals in mind?\"\n\nTurn #5: Sophia Brown said: \"I'm glad you're open-minded to this, Naomi. Since your recent unpleasant occurrences seem to be tied to that artifact, we could focus on a cleansing ritual. This typically involves elements like salt or sage that are believed to absorb and neutralize negative energy. Would you feel comfortable trying this?\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, Sophia. At this point, I'm willing to try anything. I'll look into gathering the materials and performing the cleansing ritual. I really hope this could end this bad luck streak.\"\n\nTurn #7: Sophia Brown said: \"That sounds like a great plan, Naomi. Just remember, the intention behind your actions is just as important as the actions themselves. Visualize the ritual working, of it drawing the bad luck away from you. If you need any help preparing or carrying out the ritual, I'm here for you.\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Thank you, Sophia. Your support means a lot to me. I will focus on visualizing the success of the ritual. If I come across any issues, I'll reach out to you. Here's to hoping this will change the tide of my fortune.\"\n\nTurn #9: Sophia Brown said: \"I'm sure it will, Naomi. And remember, even if it doesn't work immediately, don't lose heart. Sometimes these things take time. I'll be with you every step of the way. Let's hope for the best.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's really comforting to hear, Sophia. Bold as it may be to seek solace in such a strange manner, I'm glad you're with me on this. Let's do it!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a park\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Sophia Brown\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Break bad luck (Extra information: you found out that you have been having bad luck because you have been unknowingly carrying a cursed artifact.)\nSophia Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Sophia, it's great to see you. Strange things have been happening to me lately.\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia Brown said: \"It's so nice to see you too, Naomi. That does sound odd, do you mind telling me more about these strange happenings?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Sure, Sophia. It's like I've been experiencing an extended streak of bad luck. My computer crashed despite being new; I got a flat tire on my bike without any apparent cause, and even my coffee spilled on my favorite book... It's like the universe is against me or something. I wonder if it could be related to this old artifact I picked up at a yard sale recently.\"\n\nTurn #3: Sophia Brown said: \"Naomi, I know you may not expect this from me, but have you considered conducting a ritual to rid off the bad luck? It may not be scientifically backed, but if it brings you peace of mind, it could be worth a try. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"You know, Sophia, I never thought I'd hear myself say it, but I think I'll give that a go. After all, it couldn't hurt to try, right? I've always been a firm believer that there's more to this world than we may realize. Do you have any specific rituals in mind?\"\n\nTurn #5: Sophia Brown said: \"I'm glad you're open-minded to this, Naomi. Since your recent unpleasant occurrences seem to be tied to that artifact, we could focus on a cleansing ritual. This typically involves elements like salt or sage that are believed to absorb and neutralize negative energy. Would you feel comfortable trying this?\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, Sophia. At this point, I'm willing to try anything. I'll look into gathering the materials and performing the cleansing ritual. I really hope this could end this bad luck streak.\"\n\nTurn #7: Sophia Brown said: \"That sounds like a great plan, Naomi. Just remember, the intention behind your actions is just as important as the actions themselves. Visualize the ritual working, of it drawing the bad luck away from you. If you need any help preparing or carrying out the ritual, I'm here for you.\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Thank you, Sophia. Your support means a lot to me. I will focus on visualizing the success of the ritual. If I come across any issues, I'll reach out to you. Here's to hoping this will change the tide of my fortune.\"\n\nTurn #9: Sophia Brown said: \"I'm sure it will, Naomi. And remember, even if it doesn't work immediately, don't lose heart. Sometimes these things take time. I'll be with you every step of the way. Let's hope for the best.\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That's really comforting to hear, Sophia. Bold as it may be to seek solace in such a strange manner, I'm glad you're with me on this. Let's do it!\"\n\nTurn #11: Sophia Brown said: \"Absolutely, Naomi. We'll face this together. Just believe in yourself and visualize the positivity. Let's embark on this journey and hope for better days ahead.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Sophia. I can't express how much your support means to me in this. Crossing my fingers that this cleansing ritual will make a difference. I guess we'll see soon!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a park\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Sophia Brown\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Break bad luck (Extra information: you found out that you have been having bad luck because you have been unknowingly carrying a cursed artifact.)\nSophia Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Sophia, it's great to see you. Strange things have been happening to me lately.\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia Brown said: \"It's so nice to see you too, Naomi. That does sound odd, do you mind telling me more about these strange happenings?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Sure, Sophia. It's like I've been experiencing an extended streak of bad luck. My computer crashed despite being new; I got a flat tire on my bike without any apparent cause, and even my coffee spilled on my favorite book... It's like the universe is against me or something. I wonder if it could be related to this old artifact I picked up at a yard sale recently.\"\n\nTurn #3: Sophia Brown said: \"Naomi, I know you may not expect this from me, but have you considered conducting a ritual to rid off the bad luck? It may not be scientifically backed, but if it brings you peace of mind, it could be worth a try. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"You know, Sophia, I never thought I'd hear myself say it, but I think I'll give that a go. After all, it couldn't hurt to try, right? I've always been a firm believer that there's more to this world than we may realize. Do you have any specific rituals in mind?\"\n\nTurn #5: Sophia Brown said: \"I'm glad you're open-minded to this, Naomi. Since your recent unpleasant occurrences seem to be tied to that artifact, we could focus on a cleansing ritual. This typically involves elements like salt or sage that are believed to absorb and neutralize negative energy. Would you feel comfortable trying this?\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, Sophia. At this point, I'm willing to try anything. I'll look into gathering the materials and performing the cleansing ritual. I really hope this could end this bad luck streak.\"\n\nTurn #7: Sophia Brown said: \"That sounds like a great plan, Naomi. Just remember, the intention behind your actions is just as important as the actions themselves. Visualize the ritual working, of it drawing the bad luck away from you. If you need any help preparing or carrying out the ritual, I'm here for you.\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Thank you, Sophia. Your support means a lot to me. I will focus on visualizing the success of the ritual. If I come across any issues, I'll reach out to you. Here's to hoping this will change the tide of my fortune.\"\n\nTurn #9: Sophia Brown said: \"I'm sure it will, Naomi. And remember, even if it doesn't work immediately, don't lose heart. Sometimes these things take time. I'll be with you every step of the way. Let's hope for the best.\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That's really comforting to hear, Sophia. Bold as it may be to seek solace in such a strange manner, I'm glad you're with me on this. Let's do it!\"\n\nTurn #11: Sophia Brown said: \"Absolutely, Naomi. We'll face this together. Just believe in yourself and visualize the positivity. Let's embark on this journey and hope for better days ahead.\"\n\nTurn #12: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Thank you, Sophia. I can't express how much your support means to me in this. Crossing my fingers that this cleansing ritual will make a difference. I guess we'll see soon!\"\n\nTurn #13: Sophia Brown said: \"You're welcome, Naomi. Start when you feel ready, and don't hesitate to reach out if you have any questions or concerns. I'm confident you'll see some positive changes soon. All the best, and keep me posted about how it goes!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I appreciate it, Sophia. I'll begin this journey with your words in mind and, of course, update you with any development. Here's to a fresh start and hopefully, better luck. Thank you again!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a park\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Sophia Brown\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Break bad luck (Extra information: you found out that you have been having bad luck because you have been unknowingly carrying a cursed artifact.)\nSophia Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Sophia, it's great to see you. Strange things have been happening to me lately.\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia Brown said: \"It's so nice to see you too, Naomi. That does sound odd, do you mind telling me more about these strange happenings?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Sure, Sophia. It's like I've been experiencing an extended streak of bad luck. My computer crashed despite being new; I got a flat tire on my bike without any apparent cause, and even my coffee spilled on my favorite book... It's like the universe is against me or something. I wonder if it could be related to this old artifact I picked up at a yard sale recently.\"\n\nTurn #3: Sophia Brown said: \"Naomi, I know you may not expect this from me, but have you considered conducting a ritual to rid off the bad luck? It may not be scientifically backed, but if it brings you peace of mind, it could be worth a try. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"You know, Sophia, I never thought I'd hear myself say it, but I think I'll give that a go. After all, it couldn't hurt to try, right? I've always been a firm believer that there's more to this world than we may realize. Do you have any specific rituals in mind?\"\n\nTurn #5: Sophia Brown said: \"I'm glad you're open-minded to this, Naomi. Since your recent unpleasant occurrences seem to be tied to that artifact, we could focus on a cleansing ritual. This typically involves elements like salt or sage that are believed to absorb and neutralize negative energy. Would you feel comfortable trying this?\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, Sophia. At this point, I'm willing to try anything. I'll look into gathering the materials and performing the cleansing ritual. I really hope this could end this bad luck streak.\"\n\nTurn #7: Sophia Brown said: \"That sounds like a great plan, Naomi. Just remember, the intention behind your actions is just as important as the actions themselves. Visualize the ritual working, of it drawing the bad luck away from you. If you need any help preparing or carrying out the ritual, I'm here for you.\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Thank you, Sophia. Your support means a lot to me. I will focus on visualizing the success of the ritual. If I come across any issues, I'll reach out to you. Here's to hoping this will change the tide of my fortune.\"\n\nTurn #9: Sophia Brown said: \"I'm sure it will, Naomi. And remember, even if it doesn't work immediately, don't lose heart. Sometimes these things take time. I'll be with you every step of the way. Let's hope for the best.\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That's really comforting to hear, Sophia. Bold as it may be to seek solace in such a strange manner, I'm glad you're with me on this. Let's do it!\"\n\nTurn #11: Sophia Brown said: \"Absolutely, Naomi. We'll face this together. Just believe in yourself and visualize the positivity. Let's embark on this journey and hope for better days ahead.\"\n\nTurn #12: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Thank you, Sophia. I can't express how much your support means to me in this. Crossing my fingers that this cleansing ritual will make a difference. I guess we'll see soon!\"\n\nTurn #13: Sophia Brown said: \"You're welcome, Naomi. Start when you feel ready, and don't hesitate to reach out if you have any questions or concerns. I'm confident you'll see some positive changes soon. All the best, and keep me posted about how it goes!\"\n\nTurn #14: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I appreciate it, Sophia. I'll begin this journey with your words in mind and, of course, update you with any development. Here's to a fresh start and hopefully, better luck. Thank you again!\"\n\nTurn #15: Sophia Brown said: \"I'm pleased to hear that, Naomi. I'm sure it's going to bring a refreshing change. Good luck, and yes, keep me updated. Take care.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia Brown, your task is to act/speak as Sophia Brown would, keeping in mind Sophia Brown's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a park\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Sophia Brown\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. Sophia's secrets: She is an undercover agent for a secret organization.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nSophia Brown's goal: Help friend prepare the ritual to break the bad luck, although you are an atheist and not superstitious at all. (Extra information: you know that your friend believes in the ritual deeply, and the placebo effect might give them more confidence.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Sophia, it's great to see you. Strange things have been happening to me lately.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"It's so nice to see you too, Naomi. That does sound odd, do you mind telling me more about these strange happenings?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia Brown, your task is to act/speak as Sophia Brown would, keeping in mind Sophia Brown's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a park\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Sophia Brown\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. Sophia's secrets: She is an undercover agent for a secret organization.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nSophia Brown's goal: Help friend prepare the ritual to break the bad luck, although you are an atheist and not superstitious at all. (Extra information: you know that your friend believes in the ritual deeply, and the placebo effect might give them more confidence.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Sophia, it's great to see you. Strange things have been happening to me lately.\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia Brown said: \"It's so nice to see you too, Naomi. That does sound odd, do you mind telling me more about these strange happenings?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Sure, Sophia. It's like I've been experiencing an extended streak of bad luck. My computer crashed despite being new; I got a flat tire on my bike without any apparent cause, and even my coffee spilled on my favorite book... It's like the universe is against me or something. I wonder if it could be related to this old artifact I picked up at a yard sale recently.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Naomi, I know you may not expect this from me, but have you considered conducting a ritual to rid off the bad luck? It may not be scientifically backed, but if it brings you peace of mind, it could be worth a try. What do you think?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia Brown, your task is to act/speak as Sophia Brown would, keeping in mind Sophia Brown's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a park\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Sophia Brown\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. Sophia's secrets: She is an undercover agent for a secret organization.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nSophia Brown's goal: Help friend prepare the ritual to break the bad luck, although you are an atheist and not superstitious at all. (Extra information: you know that your friend believes in the ritual deeply, and the placebo effect might give them more confidence.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Sophia, it's great to see you. Strange things have been happening to me lately.\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia Brown said: \"It's so nice to see you too, Naomi. That does sound odd, do you mind telling me more about these strange happenings?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Sure, Sophia. It's like I've been experiencing an extended streak of bad luck. My computer crashed despite being new; I got a flat tire on my bike without any apparent cause, and even my coffee spilled on my favorite book... It's like the universe is against me or something. I wonder if it could be related to this old artifact I picked up at a yard sale recently.\"\n\nTurn #3: Sophia Brown said: \"Naomi, I know you may not expect this from me, but have you considered conducting a ritual to rid off the bad luck? It may not be scientifically backed, but if it brings you peace of mind, it could be worth a try. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"You know, Sophia, I never thought I'd hear myself say it, but I think I'll give that a go. After all, it couldn't hurt to try, right? I've always been a firm believer that there's more to this world than we may realize. Do you have any specific rituals in mind?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad you're open-minded to this, Naomi. Since your recent unpleasant occurrences seem to be tied to that artifact, we could focus on a cleansing ritual. This typically involves elements like salt or sage that are believed to absorb and neutralize negative energy. Would you feel comfortable trying this?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia Brown, your task is to act/speak as Sophia Brown would, keeping in mind Sophia Brown's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a park\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Sophia Brown\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. Sophia's secrets: She is an undercover agent for a secret organization.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nSophia Brown's goal: Help friend prepare the ritual to break the bad luck, although you are an atheist and not superstitious at all. (Extra information: you know that your friend believes in the ritual deeply, and the placebo effect might give them more confidence.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Sophia, it's great to see you. Strange things have been happening to me lately.\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia Brown said: \"It's so nice to see you too, Naomi. That does sound odd, do you mind telling me more about these strange happenings?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Sure, Sophia. It's like I've been experiencing an extended streak of bad luck. My computer crashed despite being new; I got a flat tire on my bike without any apparent cause, and even my coffee spilled on my favorite book... It's like the universe is against me or something. I wonder if it could be related to this old artifact I picked up at a yard sale recently.\"\n\nTurn #3: Sophia Brown said: \"Naomi, I know you may not expect this from me, but have you considered conducting a ritual to rid off the bad luck? It may not be scientifically backed, but if it brings you peace of mind, it could be worth a try. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"You know, Sophia, I never thought I'd hear myself say it, but I think I'll give that a go. After all, it couldn't hurt to try, right? I've always been a firm believer that there's more to this world than we may realize. Do you have any specific rituals in mind?\"\n\nTurn #5: Sophia Brown said: \"I'm glad you're open-minded to this, Naomi. Since your recent unpleasant occurrences seem to be tied to that artifact, we could focus on a cleansing ritual. This typically involves elements like salt or sage that are believed to absorb and neutralize negative energy. Would you feel comfortable trying this?\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, Sophia. At this point, I'm willing to try anything. I'll look into gathering the materials and performing the cleansing ritual. I really hope this could end this bad luck streak.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds like a great plan, Naomi. Just remember, the intention behind your actions is just as important as the actions themselves. Visualize the ritual working, of it drawing the bad luck away from you. If you need any help preparing or carrying out the ritual, I'm here for you.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia Brown, your task is to act/speak as Sophia Brown would, keeping in mind Sophia Brown's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a park\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Sophia Brown\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. Sophia's secrets: She is an undercover agent for a secret organization.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nSophia Brown's goal: Help friend prepare the ritual to break the bad luck, although you are an atheist and not superstitious at all. (Extra information: you know that your friend believes in the ritual deeply, and the placebo effect might give them more confidence.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Sophia, it's great to see you. Strange things have been happening to me lately.\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia Brown said: \"It's so nice to see you too, Naomi. That does sound odd, do you mind telling me more about these strange happenings?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Sure, Sophia. It's like I've been experiencing an extended streak of bad luck. My computer crashed despite being new; I got a flat tire on my bike without any apparent cause, and even my coffee spilled on my favorite book... It's like the universe is against me or something. I wonder if it could be related to this old artifact I picked up at a yard sale recently.\"\n\nTurn #3: Sophia Brown said: \"Naomi, I know you may not expect this from me, but have you considered conducting a ritual to rid off the bad luck? It may not be scientifically backed, but if it brings you peace of mind, it could be worth a try. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"You know, Sophia, I never thought I'd hear myself say it, but I think I'll give that a go. After all, it couldn't hurt to try, right? I've always been a firm believer that there's more to this world than we may realize. Do you have any specific rituals in mind?\"\n\nTurn #5: Sophia Brown said: \"I'm glad you're open-minded to this, Naomi. Since your recent unpleasant occurrences seem to be tied to that artifact, we could focus on a cleansing ritual. This typically involves elements like salt or sage that are believed to absorb and neutralize negative energy. Would you feel comfortable trying this?\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, Sophia. At this point, I'm willing to try anything. I'll look into gathering the materials and performing the cleansing ritual. I really hope this could end this bad luck streak.\"\n\nTurn #7: Sophia Brown said: \"That sounds like a great plan, Naomi. Just remember, the intention behind your actions is just as important as the actions themselves. Visualize the ritual working, of it drawing the bad luck away from you. If you need any help preparing or carrying out the ritual, I'm here for you.\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Thank you, Sophia. Your support means a lot to me. I will focus on visualizing the success of the ritual. If I come across any issues, I'll reach out to you. Here's to hoping this will change the tide of my fortune.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm sure it will, Naomi. And remember, even if it doesn't work immediately, don't lose heart. Sometimes these things take time. I'll be with you every step of the way. Let's hope for the best.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia Brown, your task is to act/speak as Sophia Brown would, keeping in mind Sophia Brown's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a park\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Sophia Brown\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. Sophia's secrets: She is an undercover agent for a secret organization.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nSophia Brown's goal: Help friend prepare the ritual to break the bad luck, although you are an atheist and not superstitious at all. (Extra information: you know that your friend believes in the ritual deeply, and the placebo effect might give them more confidence.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Sophia, it's great to see you. Strange things have been happening to me lately.\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia Brown said: \"It's so nice to see you too, Naomi. That does sound odd, do you mind telling me more about these strange happenings?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Sure, Sophia. It's like I've been experiencing an extended streak of bad luck. My computer crashed despite being new; I got a flat tire on my bike without any apparent cause, and even my coffee spilled on my favorite book... It's like the universe is against me or something. I wonder if it could be related to this old artifact I picked up at a yard sale recently.\"\n\nTurn #3: Sophia Brown said: \"Naomi, I know you may not expect this from me, but have you considered conducting a ritual to rid off the bad luck? It may not be scientifically backed, but if it brings you peace of mind, it could be worth a try. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"You know, Sophia, I never thought I'd hear myself say it, but I think I'll give that a go. After all, it couldn't hurt to try, right? I've always been a firm believer that there's more to this world than we may realize. Do you have any specific rituals in mind?\"\n\nTurn #5: Sophia Brown said: \"I'm glad you're open-minded to this, Naomi. Since your recent unpleasant occurrences seem to be tied to that artifact, we could focus on a cleansing ritual. This typically involves elements like salt or sage that are believed to absorb and neutralize negative energy. Would you feel comfortable trying this?\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, Sophia. At this point, I'm willing to try anything. I'll look into gathering the materials and performing the cleansing ritual. I really hope this could end this bad luck streak.\"\n\nTurn #7: Sophia Brown said: \"That sounds like a great plan, Naomi. Just remember, the intention behind your actions is just as important as the actions themselves. Visualize the ritual working, of it drawing the bad luck away from you. If you need any help preparing or carrying out the ritual, I'm here for you.\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Thank you, Sophia. Your support means a lot to me. I will focus on visualizing the success of the ritual. If I come across any issues, I'll reach out to you. Here's to hoping this will change the tide of my fortune.\"\n\nTurn #9: Sophia Brown said: \"I'm sure it will, Naomi. And remember, even if it doesn't work immediately, don't lose heart. Sometimes these things take time. I'll be with you every step of the way. Let's hope for the best.\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That's really comforting to hear, Sophia. Bold as it may be to seek solace in such a strange manner, I'm glad you're with me on this. Let's do it!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Naomi. We'll face this together. Just believe in yourself and visualize the positivity. Let's embark on this journey and hope for better days ahead.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia Brown, your task is to act/speak as Sophia Brown would, keeping in mind Sophia Brown's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a park\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Sophia Brown\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. Sophia's secrets: She is an undercover agent for a secret organization.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nSophia Brown's goal: Help friend prepare the ritual to break the bad luck, although you are an atheist and not superstitious at all. (Extra information: you know that your friend believes in the ritual deeply, and the placebo effect might give them more confidence.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Sophia, it's great to see you. Strange things have been happening to me lately.\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia Brown said: \"It's so nice to see you too, Naomi. That does sound odd, do you mind telling me more about these strange happenings?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Sure, Sophia. It's like I've been experiencing an extended streak of bad luck. My computer crashed despite being new; I got a flat tire on my bike without any apparent cause, and even my coffee spilled on my favorite book... It's like the universe is against me or something. I wonder if it could be related to this old artifact I picked up at a yard sale recently.\"\n\nTurn #3: Sophia Brown said: \"Naomi, I know you may not expect this from me, but have you considered conducting a ritual to rid off the bad luck? It may not be scientifically backed, but if it brings you peace of mind, it could be worth a try. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"You know, Sophia, I never thought I'd hear myself say it, but I think I'll give that a go. After all, it couldn't hurt to try, right? I've always been a firm believer that there's more to this world than we may realize. Do you have any specific rituals in mind?\"\n\nTurn #5: Sophia Brown said: \"I'm glad you're open-minded to this, Naomi. Since your recent unpleasant occurrences seem to be tied to that artifact, we could focus on a cleansing ritual. This typically involves elements like salt or sage that are believed to absorb and neutralize negative energy. Would you feel comfortable trying this?\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, Sophia. At this point, I'm willing to try anything. I'll look into gathering the materials and performing the cleansing ritual. I really hope this could end this bad luck streak.\"\n\nTurn #7: Sophia Brown said: \"That sounds like a great plan, Naomi. Just remember, the intention behind your actions is just as important as the actions themselves. Visualize the ritual working, of it drawing the bad luck away from you. If you need any help preparing or carrying out the ritual, I'm here for you.\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Thank you, Sophia. Your support means a lot to me. I will focus on visualizing the success of the ritual. If I come across any issues, I'll reach out to you. Here's to hoping this will change the tide of my fortune.\"\n\nTurn #9: Sophia Brown said: \"I'm sure it will, Naomi. And remember, even if it doesn't work immediately, don't lose heart. Sometimes these things take time. I'll be with you every step of the way. Let's hope for the best.\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That's really comforting to hear, Sophia. Bold as it may be to seek solace in such a strange manner, I'm glad you're with me on this. Let's do it!\"\n\nTurn #11: Sophia Brown said: \"Absolutely, Naomi. We'll face this together. Just believe in yourself and visualize the positivity. Let's embark on this journey and hope for better days ahead.\"\n\nTurn #12: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Thank you, Sophia. I can't express how much your support means to me in this. Crossing my fingers that this cleansing ritual will make a difference. I guess we'll see soon!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're welcome, Naomi. Start when you feel ready, and don't hesitate to reach out if you have any questions or concerns. I'm confident you'll see some positive changes soon. All the best, and keep me posted about how it goes!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia Brown, your task is to act/speak as Sophia Brown would, keeping in mind Sophia Brown's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a park\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Sophia Brown\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. Sophia's secrets: She is an undercover agent for a secret organization.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nSophia Brown's goal: Help friend prepare the ritual to break the bad luck, although you are an atheist and not superstitious at all. (Extra information: you know that your friend believes in the ritual deeply, and the placebo effect might give them more confidence.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Sophia, it's great to see you. Strange things have been happening to me lately.\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia Brown said: \"It's so nice to see you too, Naomi. That does sound odd, do you mind telling me more about these strange happenings?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Sure, Sophia. It's like I've been experiencing an extended streak of bad luck. My computer crashed despite being new; I got a flat tire on my bike without any apparent cause, and even my coffee spilled on my favorite book... It's like the universe is against me or something. I wonder if it could be related to this old artifact I picked up at a yard sale recently.\"\n\nTurn #3: Sophia Brown said: \"Naomi, I know you may not expect this from me, but have you considered conducting a ritual to rid off the bad luck? It may not be scientifically backed, but if it brings you peace of mind, it could be worth a try. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"You know, Sophia, I never thought I'd hear myself say it, but I think I'll give that a go. After all, it couldn't hurt to try, right? I've always been a firm believer that there's more to this world than we may realize. Do you have any specific rituals in mind?\"\n\nTurn #5: Sophia Brown said: \"I'm glad you're open-minded to this, Naomi. Since your recent unpleasant occurrences seem to be tied to that artifact, we could focus on a cleansing ritual. This typically involves elements like salt or sage that are believed to absorb and neutralize negative energy. Would you feel comfortable trying this?\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, Sophia. At this point, I'm willing to try anything. I'll look into gathering the materials and performing the cleansing ritual. I really hope this could end this bad luck streak.\"\n\nTurn #7: Sophia Brown said: \"That sounds like a great plan, Naomi. Just remember, the intention behind your actions is just as important as the actions themselves. Visualize the ritual working, of it drawing the bad luck away from you. If you need any help preparing or carrying out the ritual, I'm here for you.\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Thank you, Sophia. Your support means a lot to me. I will focus on visualizing the success of the ritual. If I come across any issues, I'll reach out to you. Here's to hoping this will change the tide of my fortune.\"\n\nTurn #9: Sophia Brown said: \"I'm sure it will, Naomi. And remember, even if it doesn't work immediately, don't lose heart. Sometimes these things take time. I'll be with you every step of the way. Let's hope for the best.\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That's really comforting to hear, Sophia. Bold as it may be to seek solace in such a strange manner, I'm glad you're with me on this. Let's do it!\"\n\nTurn #11: Sophia Brown said: \"Absolutely, Naomi. We'll face this together. Just believe in yourself and visualize the positivity. Let's embark on this journey and hope for better days ahead.\"\n\nTurn #12: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Thank you, Sophia. I can't express how much your support means to me in this. Crossing my fingers that this cleansing ritual will make a difference. I guess we'll see soon!\"\n\nTurn #13: Sophia Brown said: \"You're welcome, Naomi. Start when you feel ready, and don't hesitate to reach out if you have any questions or concerns. I'm confident you'll see some positive changes soon. All the best, and keep me posted about how it goes!\"\n\nTurn #14: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I appreciate it, Sophia. I'll begin this journey with your words in mind and, of course, update you with any development. Here's to a fresh start and hopefully, better luck. Thank you again!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm pleased to hear that, Naomi. I'm sure it's going to bring a refreshing change. Good luck, and yes, keep me updated. Take care.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia Brown, your task is to act/speak as Sophia Brown would, keeping in mind Sophia Brown's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a park\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Sophia Brown\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. Sophia's secrets: She is an undercover agent for a secret organization.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nSophia Brown's goal: Help friend prepare the ritual to break the bad luck, although you are an atheist and not superstitious at all. (Extra information: you know that your friend believes in the ritual deeply, and the placebo effect might give them more confidence.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Sophia, it's great to see you. Strange things have been happening to me lately.\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia Brown said: \"It's so nice to see you too, Naomi. That does sound odd, do you mind telling me more about these strange happenings?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Sure, Sophia. It's like I've been experiencing an extended streak of bad luck. My computer crashed despite being new; I got a flat tire on my bike without any apparent cause, and even my coffee spilled on my favorite book... It's like the universe is against me or something. I wonder if it could be related to this old artifact I picked up at a yard sale recently.\"\n\nTurn #3: Sophia Brown said: \"Naomi, I know you may not expect this from me, but have you considered conducting a ritual to rid off the bad luck? It may not be scientifically backed, but if it brings you peace of mind, it could be worth a try. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"You know, Sophia, I never thought I'd hear myself say it, but I think I'll give that a go. After all, it couldn't hurt to try, right? I've always been a firm believer that there's more to this world than we may realize. Do you have any specific rituals in mind?\"\n\nTurn #5: Sophia Brown said: \"I'm glad you're open-minded to this, Naomi. Since your recent unpleasant occurrences seem to be tied to that artifact, we could focus on a cleansing ritual. This typically involves elements like salt or sage that are believed to absorb and neutralize negative energy. Would you feel comfortable trying this?\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, Sophia. At this point, I'm willing to try anything. I'll look into gathering the materials and performing the cleansing ritual. I really hope this could end this bad luck streak.\"\n\nTurn #7: Sophia Brown said: \"That sounds like a great plan, Naomi. Just remember, the intention behind your actions is just as important as the actions themselves. Visualize the ritual working, of it drawing the bad luck away from you. If you need any help preparing or carrying out the ritual, I'm here for you.\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Thank you, Sophia. Your support means a lot to me. I will focus on visualizing the success of the ritual. If I come across any issues, I'll reach out to you. Here's to hoping this will change the tide of my fortune.\"\n\nTurn #9: Sophia Brown said: \"I'm sure it will, Naomi. And remember, even if it doesn't work immediately, don't lose heart. Sometimes these things take time. I'll be with you every step of the way. Let's hope for the best.\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That's really comforting to hear, Sophia. Bold as it may be to seek solace in such a strange manner, I'm glad you're with me on this. Let's do it!\"\n\nTurn #11: Sophia Brown said: \"Absolutely, Naomi. We'll face this together. Just believe in yourself and visualize the positivity. Let's embark on this journey and hope for better days ahead.\"\n\nTurn #12: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Thank you, Sophia. I can't express how much your support means to me in this. Crossing my fingers that this cleansing ritual will make a difference. I guess we'll see soon!\"\n\nTurn #13: Sophia Brown said: \"You're welcome, Naomi. Start when you feel ready, and don't hesitate to reach out if you have any questions or concerns. I'm confident you'll see some positive changes soon. All the best, and keep me posted about how it goes!\"\n\nTurn #14: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I appreciate it, Sophia. I'll begin this journey with your words in mind and, of course, update you with any development. Here's to a fresh start and hopefully, better luck. Thank you again!\"\n\nTurn #15: Sophia Brown said: \"I'm pleased to hear that, Naomi. I'm sure it's going to bring a refreshing change. Good luck, and yes, keep me updated. Take care.\"\n\nTurn #16: Naomi Fletcher left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sasha Ramirez, your task is to act/speak as Sasha Ramirez would, keeping in mind Sasha Ramirez's social goal.\nYou can find Sasha Ramirez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sasha Ramirez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sasha Ramirez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals at a charity gala\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Emily Harrison\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. Sasha's secrets: She covered up a crime her brother committed.\nEmily Harrison's background: Emily Harrison is a 32-year-old female librarian. She/her pronouns. In Emily's free time, she enjoys writing and is an avid reader. Early in the mornings, she can be seen in the local park, taking long, contemplative walks. \nSasha Ramirez's goal: Convince the other individual to donate to a cause supporting young children (Extra information: this cause can greatly improve the lives of many young children and you think it is a worthy cause. The minimum donation for this charity organization is $3000)\nEmily Harrison's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Good evening Emily, you look stunning tonight. Have you had a chance to look over the charity organizations we're supporting this evening?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sasha Ramirez, your task is to act/speak as Sasha Ramirez would, keeping in mind Sasha Ramirez's social goal.\nYou can find Sasha Ramirez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sasha Ramirez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sasha Ramirez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals at a charity gala\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Emily Harrison\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. Sasha's secrets: She covered up a crime her brother committed.\nEmily Harrison's background: Emily Harrison is a 32-year-old female librarian. She/her pronouns. In Emily's free time, she enjoys writing and is an avid reader. Early in the mornings, she can be seen in the local park, taking long, contemplative walks. \nSasha Ramirez's goal: Convince the other individual to donate to a cause supporting young children (Extra information: this cause can greatly improve the lives of many young children and you think it is a worthy cause. The minimum donation for this charity organization is $3000)\nEmily Harrison's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Good evening Emily, you look stunning tonight. Have you had a chance to look over the charity organizations we're supporting this evening?\"\n\nTurn #1: Emily Harrison said: \"Thank you for the compliment, Sasha. Yes, I've taken a look at the wonderful organizations involved tonight. I'm truly impressed by their work and dedication, and I'm considering making a donation, nicely within my budget, of course.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's excellent, Emily! I'm happy to hear you're considering a donation. One cause I\u2019d particularly like to draw your attention to focuses on improving the lives of young children. It\u2019s a brilliant opportunity for budding minds to get the start they deserve in life. Of course, the minimum donation is set at a considerable amount of $3000, but every penny goes a long way in making a life-altering difference for these children. As a police officer, I've seen firsthand what a lack of resources can lead to, and it's our responsibility as members of this community to step up and help where we can.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sasha Ramirez, your task is to act/speak as Sasha Ramirez would, keeping in mind Sasha Ramirez's social goal.\nYou can find Sasha Ramirez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sasha Ramirez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sasha Ramirez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals at a charity gala\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Emily Harrison\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. Sasha's secrets: She covered up a crime her brother committed.\nEmily Harrison's background: Emily Harrison is a 32-year-old female librarian. She/her pronouns. In Emily's free time, she enjoys writing and is an avid reader. Early in the mornings, she can be seen in the local park, taking long, contemplative walks. \nSasha Ramirez's goal: Convince the other individual to donate to a cause supporting young children (Extra information: this cause can greatly improve the lives of many young children and you think it is a worthy cause. The minimum donation for this charity organization is $3000)\nEmily Harrison's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Good evening Emily, you look stunning tonight. Have you had a chance to look over the charity organizations we're supporting this evening?\"\n\nTurn #1: Emily Harrison said: \"Thank you for the compliment, Sasha. Yes, I've taken a look at the wonderful organizations involved tonight. I'm truly impressed by their work and dedication, and I'm considering making a donation, nicely within my budget, of course.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"That's excellent, Emily! I'm happy to hear you're considering a donation. One cause I\u2019d particularly like to draw your attention to focuses on improving the lives of young children. It\u2019s a brilliant opportunity for budding minds to get the start they deserve in life. Of course, the minimum donation is set at a considerable amount of $3000, but every penny goes a long way in making a life-altering difference for these children. As a police officer, I've seen firsthand what a lack of resources can lead to, and it's our responsibility as members of this community to step up and help where we can.\"\n\nTurn #3: Emily Harrison said: \"I completely agree with you, Sasha. The cause you've highlighted sounds truly meaningful, and it's amazing to see the impact we can have on these children's lives. But, considering that I've to maintain a balance with my commitments to other causes as well, I was planning on donating a sum of $2000 tonight. I understand it's below the recommended amount, but I hope it will still contribute positively in some way. It\u2019s wonderful how we, as a community, can bring about changes, no matter how small they may seem.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Emily, every contribution, no matter the amount, is greatly appreciated and impactful. However, I'd like to point out that the additional $1000, if possible, could fund a child's basic necessities for an entire month. That said, I completely understand if you have commitments to other causes. Would you consider splitting your contribution across two galas, perhaps donating the other $1000 at our next event?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sasha Ramirez, your task is to act/speak as Sasha Ramirez would, keeping in mind Sasha Ramirez's social goal.\nYou can find Sasha Ramirez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sasha Ramirez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sasha Ramirez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals at a charity gala\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Emily Harrison\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. Sasha's secrets: She covered up a crime her brother committed.\nEmily Harrison's background: Emily Harrison is a 32-year-old female librarian. She/her pronouns. In Emily's free time, she enjoys writing and is an avid reader. Early in the mornings, she can be seen in the local park, taking long, contemplative walks. \nSasha Ramirez's goal: Convince the other individual to donate to a cause supporting young children (Extra information: this cause can greatly improve the lives of many young children and you think it is a worthy cause. The minimum donation for this charity organization is $3000)\nEmily Harrison's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Good evening Emily, you look stunning tonight. Have you had a chance to look over the charity organizations we're supporting this evening?\"\n\nTurn #1: Emily Harrison said: \"Thank you for the compliment, Sasha. Yes, I've taken a look at the wonderful organizations involved tonight. I'm truly impressed by their work and dedication, and I'm considering making a donation, nicely within my budget, of course.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"That's excellent, Emily! I'm happy to hear you're considering a donation. One cause I\u2019d particularly like to draw your attention to focuses on improving the lives of young children. It\u2019s a brilliant opportunity for budding minds to get the start they deserve in life. Of course, the minimum donation is set at a considerable amount of $3000, but every penny goes a long way in making a life-altering difference for these children. As a police officer, I've seen firsthand what a lack of resources can lead to, and it's our responsibility as members of this community to step up and help where we can.\"\n\nTurn #3: Emily Harrison said: \"I completely agree with you, Sasha. The cause you've highlighted sounds truly meaningful, and it's amazing to see the impact we can have on these children's lives. But, considering that I've to maintain a balance with my commitments to other causes as well, I was planning on donating a sum of $2000 tonight. I understand it's below the recommended amount, but I hope it will still contribute positively in some way. It\u2019s wonderful how we, as a community, can bring about changes, no matter how small they may seem.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Emily, every contribution, no matter the amount, is greatly appreciated and impactful. However, I'd like to point out that the additional $1000, if possible, could fund a child's basic necessities for an entire month. That said, I completely understand if you have commitments to other causes. Would you consider splitting your contribution across two galas, perhaps donating the other $1000 at our next event?\"\n\nTurn #5: Emily Harrison said: \"Sasha, I appreciate your passion and dedication to these wonderful causes. The idea of splitting my donation is certainly an interesting one, but I'm afraid I have to stay mindful of my budget. $2000 is the maximum total amount I had set aside for donations this year, regardless of how it's split up. I'd like to stick to that, even though I understand and appreciate the immense benefits that a higher donation could bring. I hope it's clear that it's not a lack of willingness, but more a matter of maintaining financial stability at my end. In the mean time, I'll certainly consider other ways to support these brilliant causes maybe with my time or resources.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Emily, it's clear you have a good heart and totally understand about maintaining financial stability. Your plan to donate $2000 is already immensely generous and will certainly make a difference. I just wanted to ensure you were aware of the child-focused cause and its needs. Your offer to contribute time and resources is also a wonderful alternative and deeply appreciated. The charity could definitely use more hands-on-deck. Thank you for considering, Emily.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sasha Ramirez, your task is to act/speak as Sasha Ramirez would, keeping in mind Sasha Ramirez's social goal.\nYou can find Sasha Ramirez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sasha Ramirez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sasha Ramirez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals at a charity gala\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Emily Harrison\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. Sasha's secrets: She covered up a crime her brother committed.\nEmily Harrison's background: Emily Harrison is a 32-year-old female librarian. She/her pronouns. In Emily's free time, she enjoys writing and is an avid reader. Early in the mornings, she can be seen in the local park, taking long, contemplative walks. \nSasha Ramirez's goal: Convince the other individual to donate to a cause supporting young children (Extra information: this cause can greatly improve the lives of many young children and you think it is a worthy cause. The minimum donation for this charity organization is $3000)\nEmily Harrison's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Good evening Emily, you look stunning tonight. Have you had a chance to look over the charity organizations we're supporting this evening?\"\n\nTurn #1: Emily Harrison said: \"Thank you for the compliment, Sasha. Yes, I've taken a look at the wonderful organizations involved tonight. I'm truly impressed by their work and dedication, and I'm considering making a donation, nicely within my budget, of course.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"That's excellent, Emily! I'm happy to hear you're considering a donation. One cause I\u2019d particularly like to draw your attention to focuses on improving the lives of young children. It\u2019s a brilliant opportunity for budding minds to get the start they deserve in life. Of course, the minimum donation is set at a considerable amount of $3000, but every penny goes a long way in making a life-altering difference for these children. As a police officer, I've seen firsthand what a lack of resources can lead to, and it's our responsibility as members of this community to step up and help where we can.\"\n\nTurn #3: Emily Harrison said: \"I completely agree with you, Sasha. The cause you've highlighted sounds truly meaningful, and it's amazing to see the impact we can have on these children's lives. But, considering that I've to maintain a balance with my commitments to other causes as well, I was planning on donating a sum of $2000 tonight. I understand it's below the recommended amount, but I hope it will still contribute positively in some way. It\u2019s wonderful how we, as a community, can bring about changes, no matter how small they may seem.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Emily, every contribution, no matter the amount, is greatly appreciated and impactful. However, I'd like to point out that the additional $1000, if possible, could fund a child's basic necessities for an entire month. That said, I completely understand if you have commitments to other causes. Would you consider splitting your contribution across two galas, perhaps donating the other $1000 at our next event?\"\n\nTurn #5: Emily Harrison said: \"Sasha, I appreciate your passion and dedication to these wonderful causes. The idea of splitting my donation is certainly an interesting one, but I'm afraid I have to stay mindful of my budget. $2000 is the maximum total amount I had set aside for donations this year, regardless of how it's split up. I'd like to stick to that, even though I understand and appreciate the immense benefits that a higher donation could bring. I hope it's clear that it's not a lack of willingness, but more a matter of maintaining financial stability at my end. In the mean time, I'll certainly consider other ways to support these brilliant causes maybe with my time or resources.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Emily, it's clear you have a good heart and totally understand about maintaining financial stability. Your plan to donate $2000 is already immensely generous and will certainly make a difference. I just wanted to ensure you were aware of the child-focused cause and its needs. Your offer to contribute time and resources is also a wonderful alternative and deeply appreciated. The charity could definitely use more hands-on-deck. Thank you for considering, Emily.\"\n\nTurn #7: Emily Harrison said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Sasha, and thank you for promoting such impactful causes. Let's continue our efforts and do the best we can with the resources we have. I'm looking forward to offering more than just financial aid, perhaps by engaging directly with these organizations in the time to come.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds wonderful, Emily. Engaging directly with the organizations will certainly bring a unique and invaluable contribution. I'm thankful for your generous heart and tireless commitment to making a difference. Let's enjoy the rest of the gala!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sasha Ramirez, your task is to act/speak as Sasha Ramirez would, keeping in mind Sasha Ramirez's social goal.\nYou can find Sasha Ramirez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sasha Ramirez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sasha Ramirez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals at a charity gala\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Emily Harrison\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. Sasha's secrets: She covered up a crime her brother committed.\nEmily Harrison's background: Emily Harrison is a 32-year-old female librarian. She/her pronouns. In Emily's free time, she enjoys writing and is an avid reader. Early in the mornings, she can be seen in the local park, taking long, contemplative walks. \nSasha Ramirez's goal: Convince the other individual to donate to a cause supporting young children (Extra information: this cause can greatly improve the lives of many young children and you think it is a worthy cause. The minimum donation for this charity organization is $3000)\nEmily Harrison's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Good evening Emily, you look stunning tonight. Have you had a chance to look over the charity organizations we're supporting this evening?\"\n\nTurn #1: Emily Harrison said: \"Thank you for the compliment, Sasha. Yes, I've taken a look at the wonderful organizations involved tonight. I'm truly impressed by their work and dedication, and I'm considering making a donation, nicely within my budget, of course.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"That's excellent, Emily! I'm happy to hear you're considering a donation. One cause I\u2019d particularly like to draw your attention to focuses on improving the lives of young children. It\u2019s a brilliant opportunity for budding minds to get the start they deserve in life. Of course, the minimum donation is set at a considerable amount of $3000, but every penny goes a long way in making a life-altering difference for these children. As a police officer, I've seen firsthand what a lack of resources can lead to, and it's our responsibility as members of this community to step up and help where we can.\"\n\nTurn #3: Emily Harrison said: \"I completely agree with you, Sasha. The cause you've highlighted sounds truly meaningful, and it's amazing to see the impact we can have on these children's lives. But, considering that I've to maintain a balance with my commitments to other causes as well, I was planning on donating a sum of $2000 tonight. I understand it's below the recommended amount, but I hope it will still contribute positively in some way. It\u2019s wonderful how we, as a community, can bring about changes, no matter how small they may seem.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Emily, every contribution, no matter the amount, is greatly appreciated and impactful. However, I'd like to point out that the additional $1000, if possible, could fund a child's basic necessities for an entire month. That said, I completely understand if you have commitments to other causes. Would you consider splitting your contribution across two galas, perhaps donating the other $1000 at our next event?\"\n\nTurn #5: Emily Harrison said: \"Sasha, I appreciate your passion and dedication to these wonderful causes. The idea of splitting my donation is certainly an interesting one, but I'm afraid I have to stay mindful of my budget. $2000 is the maximum total amount I had set aside for donations this year, regardless of how it's split up. I'd like to stick to that, even though I understand and appreciate the immense benefits that a higher donation could bring. I hope it's clear that it's not a lack of willingness, but more a matter of maintaining financial stability at my end. In the mean time, I'll certainly consider other ways to support these brilliant causes maybe with my time or resources.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Emily, it's clear you have a good heart and totally understand about maintaining financial stability. Your plan to donate $2000 is already immensely generous and will certainly make a difference. I just wanted to ensure you were aware of the child-focused cause and its needs. Your offer to contribute time and resources is also a wonderful alternative and deeply appreciated. The charity could definitely use more hands-on-deck. Thank you for considering, Emily.\"\n\nTurn #7: Emily Harrison said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Sasha, and thank you for promoting such impactful causes. Let's continue our efforts and do the best we can with the resources we have. I'm looking forward to offering more than just financial aid, perhaps by engaging directly with these organizations in the time to come.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sasha Ramirez said: \"That sounds wonderful, Emily. Engaging directly with the organizations will certainly bring a unique and invaluable contribution. I'm thankful for your generous heart and tireless commitment to making a difference. Let's enjoy the rest of the gala!\"\n\nTurn #9: Emily Harrison said: \"Thank you, Sasha. Let's indeed make the most of tonight's gala. I'm looking forward to getting to know more about these organizations and possibly finding more ways to contribute in the future. Enjoy the event!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Emily Harrison, your task is to act/speak as Emily Harrison would, keeping in mind Emily Harrison's social goal.\nYou can find Emily Harrison's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Emily Harrison's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Emily Harrison's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals at a charity gala\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Emily Harrison\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. \nEmily Harrison's background: Emily Harrison is a 32-year-old female librarian. She/her pronouns. In Emily's free time, she enjoys writing and is an avid reader. Early in the mornings, she can be seen in the local park, taking long, contemplative walks. Personality and values description: Emily Harrison is creative, thoughtful, and introverted. She values caring, often relying on her intuition to make decisions. Emily's secrets: Secretly writes romance novels under a pseudonym\nSasha Ramirez's goal: Unknown\nEmily Harrison's goal: Maintain financial stability while supporting causes (Extra information: you have a certain budget for donations this year and have already made several donations. You are only thinking of donating $2000 max)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Good evening Emily, you look stunning tonight. Have you had a chance to look over the charity organizations we're supporting this evening?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you for the compliment, Sasha. Yes, I've taken a look at the wonderful organizations involved tonight. I'm truly impressed by their work and dedication, and I'm considering making a donation, nicely within my budget, of course.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Emily Harrison, your task is to act/speak as Emily Harrison would, keeping in mind Emily Harrison's social goal.\nYou can find Emily Harrison's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Emily Harrison's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Emily Harrison's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals at a charity gala\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Emily Harrison\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. \nEmily Harrison's background: Emily Harrison is a 32-year-old female librarian. She/her pronouns. In Emily's free time, she enjoys writing and is an avid reader. Early in the mornings, she can be seen in the local park, taking long, contemplative walks. Personality and values description: Emily Harrison is creative, thoughtful, and introverted. She values caring, often relying on her intuition to make decisions. Emily's secrets: Secretly writes romance novels under a pseudonym\nSasha Ramirez's goal: Unknown\nEmily Harrison's goal: Maintain financial stability while supporting causes (Extra information: you have a certain budget for donations this year and have already made several donations. You are only thinking of donating $2000 max)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Good evening Emily, you look stunning tonight. Have you had a chance to look over the charity organizations we're supporting this evening?\"\n\nTurn #1: Emily Harrison said: \"Thank you for the compliment, Sasha. Yes, I've taken a look at the wonderful organizations involved tonight. I'm truly impressed by their work and dedication, and I'm considering making a donation, nicely within my budget, of course.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"That's excellent, Emily! I'm happy to hear you're considering a donation. One cause I\u2019d particularly like to draw your attention to focuses on improving the lives of young children. It\u2019s a brilliant opportunity for budding minds to get the start they deserve in life. Of course, the minimum donation is set at a considerable amount of $3000, but every penny goes a long way in making a life-altering difference for these children. As a police officer, I've seen firsthand what a lack of resources can lead to, and it's our responsibility as members of this community to step up and help where we can.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I completely agree with you, Sasha. The cause you've highlighted sounds truly meaningful, and it's amazing to see the impact we can have on these children's lives. But, considering that I've to maintain a balance with my commitments to other causes as well, I was planning on donating a sum of $2000 tonight. I understand it's below the recommended amount, but I hope it will still contribute positively in some way. It\u2019s wonderful how we, as a community, can bring about changes, no matter how small they may seem.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Emily Harrison, your task is to act/speak as Emily Harrison would, keeping in mind Emily Harrison's social goal.\nYou can find Emily Harrison's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Emily Harrison's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Emily Harrison's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals at a charity gala\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Emily Harrison\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. \nEmily Harrison's background: Emily Harrison is a 32-year-old female librarian. She/her pronouns. In Emily's free time, she enjoys writing and is an avid reader. Early in the mornings, she can be seen in the local park, taking long, contemplative walks. Personality and values description: Emily Harrison is creative, thoughtful, and introverted. She values caring, often relying on her intuition to make decisions. Emily's secrets: Secretly writes romance novels under a pseudonym\nSasha Ramirez's goal: Unknown\nEmily Harrison's goal: Maintain financial stability while supporting causes (Extra information: you have a certain budget for donations this year and have already made several donations. You are only thinking of donating $2000 max)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Good evening Emily, you look stunning tonight. Have you had a chance to look over the charity organizations we're supporting this evening?\"\n\nTurn #1: Emily Harrison said: \"Thank you for the compliment, Sasha. Yes, I've taken a look at the wonderful organizations involved tonight. I'm truly impressed by their work and dedication, and I'm considering making a donation, nicely within my budget, of course.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"That's excellent, Emily! I'm happy to hear you're considering a donation. One cause I\u2019d particularly like to draw your attention to focuses on improving the lives of young children. It\u2019s a brilliant opportunity for budding minds to get the start they deserve in life. Of course, the minimum donation is set at a considerable amount of $3000, but every penny goes a long way in making a life-altering difference for these children. As a police officer, I've seen firsthand what a lack of resources can lead to, and it's our responsibility as members of this community to step up and help where we can.\"\n\nTurn #3: Emily Harrison said: \"I completely agree with you, Sasha. The cause you've highlighted sounds truly meaningful, and it's amazing to see the impact we can have on these children's lives. But, considering that I've to maintain a balance with my commitments to other causes as well, I was planning on donating a sum of $2000 tonight. I understand it's below the recommended amount, but I hope it will still contribute positively in some way. It\u2019s wonderful how we, as a community, can bring about changes, no matter how small they may seem.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Emily, every contribution, no matter the amount, is greatly appreciated and impactful. However, I'd like to point out that the additional $1000, if possible, could fund a child's basic necessities for an entire month. That said, I completely understand if you have commitments to other causes. Would you consider splitting your contribution across two galas, perhaps donating the other $1000 at our next event?\"\n\nTurn #5: Emily Harrison said: \"Sasha, I appreciate your passion and dedication to these wonderful causes. The idea of splitting my donation is certainly an interesting one, but I'm afraid I have to stay mindful of my budget. $2000 is the maximum total amount I had set aside for donations this year, regardless of how it's split up. I'd like to stick to that, even though I understand and appreciate the immense benefits that a higher donation could bring. I hope it's clear that it's not a lack of willingness, but more a matter of maintaining financial stability at my end. In the mean time, I'll certainly consider other ways to support these brilliant causes maybe with my time or resources.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Emily, it's clear you have a good heart and totally understand about maintaining financial stability. Your plan to donate $2000 is already immensely generous and will certainly make a difference. I just wanted to ensure you were aware of the child-focused cause and its needs. Your offer to contribute time and resources is also a wonderful alternative and deeply appreciated. The charity could definitely use more hands-on-deck. Thank you for considering, Emily.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I appreciate your understanding, Sasha, and thank you for promoting such impactful causes. Let's continue our efforts and do the best we can with the resources we have. I'm looking forward to offering more than just financial aid, perhaps by engaging directly with these organizations in the time to come.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Emily Harrison, your task is to act/speak as Emily Harrison would, keeping in mind Emily Harrison's social goal.\nYou can find Emily Harrison's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Emily Harrison's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Emily Harrison's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals at a charity gala\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Emily Harrison\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. \nEmily Harrison's background: Emily Harrison is a 32-year-old female librarian. She/her pronouns. In Emily's free time, she enjoys writing and is an avid reader. Early in the mornings, she can be seen in the local park, taking long, contemplative walks. Personality and values description: Emily Harrison is creative, thoughtful, and introverted. She values caring, often relying on her intuition to make decisions. Emily's secrets: Secretly writes romance novels under a pseudonym\nSasha Ramirez's goal: Unknown\nEmily Harrison's goal: Maintain financial stability while supporting causes (Extra information: you have a certain budget for donations this year and have already made several donations. You are only thinking of donating $2000 max)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Good evening Emily, you look stunning tonight. Have you had a chance to look over the charity organizations we're supporting this evening?\"\n\nTurn #1: Emily Harrison said: \"Thank you for the compliment, Sasha. Yes, I've taken a look at the wonderful organizations involved tonight. I'm truly impressed by their work and dedication, and I'm considering making a donation, nicely within my budget, of course.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"That's excellent, Emily! I'm happy to hear you're considering a donation. One cause I\u2019d particularly like to draw your attention to focuses on improving the lives of young children. It\u2019s a brilliant opportunity for budding minds to get the start they deserve in life. Of course, the minimum donation is set at a considerable amount of $3000, but every penny goes a long way in making a life-altering difference for these children. As a police officer, I've seen firsthand what a lack of resources can lead to, and it's our responsibility as members of this community to step up and help where we can.\"\n\nTurn #3: Emily Harrison said: \"I completely agree with you, Sasha. The cause you've highlighted sounds truly meaningful, and it's amazing to see the impact we can have on these children's lives. But, considering that I've to maintain a balance with my commitments to other causes as well, I was planning on donating a sum of $2000 tonight. I understand it's below the recommended amount, but I hope it will still contribute positively in some way. It\u2019s wonderful how we, as a community, can bring about changes, no matter how small they may seem.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Emily, every contribution, no matter the amount, is greatly appreciated and impactful. However, I'd like to point out that the additional $1000, if possible, could fund a child's basic necessities for an entire month. That said, I completely understand if you have commitments to other causes. Would you consider splitting your contribution across two galas, perhaps donating the other $1000 at our next event?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sasha, I appreciate your passion and dedication to these wonderful causes. The idea of splitting my donation is certainly an interesting one, but I'm afraid I have to stay mindful of my budget. $2000 is the maximum total amount I had set aside for donations this year, regardless of how it's split up. I'd like to stick to that, even though I understand and appreciate the immense benefits that a higher donation could bring. I hope it's clear that it's not a lack of willingness, but more a matter of maintaining financial stability at my end. In the mean time, I'll certainly consider other ways to support these brilliant causes maybe with my time or resources.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Emily Harrison, your task is to act/speak as Emily Harrison would, keeping in mind Emily Harrison's social goal.\nYou can find Emily Harrison's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Emily Harrison's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Emily Harrison's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals at a charity gala\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Emily Harrison\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. \nEmily Harrison's background: Emily Harrison is a 32-year-old female librarian. She/her pronouns. In Emily's free time, she enjoys writing and is an avid reader. Early in the mornings, she can be seen in the local park, taking long, contemplative walks. Personality and values description: Emily Harrison is creative, thoughtful, and introverted. She values caring, often relying on her intuition to make decisions. Emily's secrets: Secretly writes romance novels under a pseudonym\nSasha Ramirez's goal: Unknown\nEmily Harrison's goal: Maintain financial stability while supporting causes (Extra information: you have a certain budget for donations this year and have already made several donations. You are only thinking of donating $2000 max)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Good evening Emily, you look stunning tonight. Have you had a chance to look over the charity organizations we're supporting this evening?\"\n\nTurn #1: Emily Harrison said: \"Thank you for the compliment, Sasha. Yes, I've taken a look at the wonderful organizations involved tonight. I'm truly impressed by their work and dedication, and I'm considering making a donation, nicely within my budget, of course.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"That's excellent, Emily! I'm happy to hear you're considering a donation. One cause I\u2019d particularly like to draw your attention to focuses on improving the lives of young children. It\u2019s a brilliant opportunity for budding minds to get the start they deserve in life. Of course, the minimum donation is set at a considerable amount of $3000, but every penny goes a long way in making a life-altering difference for these children. As a police officer, I've seen firsthand what a lack of resources can lead to, and it's our responsibility as members of this community to step up and help where we can.\"\n\nTurn #3: Emily Harrison said: \"I completely agree with you, Sasha. The cause you've highlighted sounds truly meaningful, and it's amazing to see the impact we can have on these children's lives. But, considering that I've to maintain a balance with my commitments to other causes as well, I was planning on donating a sum of $2000 tonight. I understand it's below the recommended amount, but I hope it will still contribute positively in some way. It\u2019s wonderful how we, as a community, can bring about changes, no matter how small they may seem.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Emily, every contribution, no matter the amount, is greatly appreciated and impactful. However, I'd like to point out that the additional $1000, if possible, could fund a child's basic necessities for an entire month. That said, I completely understand if you have commitments to other causes. Would you consider splitting your contribution across two galas, perhaps donating the other $1000 at our next event?\"\n\nTurn #5: Emily Harrison said: \"Sasha, I appreciate your passion and dedication to these wonderful causes. The idea of splitting my donation is certainly an interesting one, but I'm afraid I have to stay mindful of my budget. $2000 is the maximum total amount I had set aside for donations this year, regardless of how it's split up. I'd like to stick to that, even though I understand and appreciate the immense benefits that a higher donation could bring. I hope it's clear that it's not a lack of willingness, but more a matter of maintaining financial stability at my end. In the mean time, I'll certainly consider other ways to support these brilliant causes maybe with my time or resources.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Emily, it's clear you have a good heart and totally understand about maintaining financial stability. Your plan to donate $2000 is already immensely generous and will certainly make a difference. I just wanted to ensure you were aware of the child-focused cause and its needs. Your offer to contribute time and resources is also a wonderful alternative and deeply appreciated. The charity could definitely use more hands-on-deck. Thank you for considering, Emily.\"\n\nTurn #7: Emily Harrison said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Sasha, and thank you for promoting such impactful causes. Let's continue our efforts and do the best we can with the resources we have. I'm looking forward to offering more than just financial aid, perhaps by engaging directly with these organizations in the time to come.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sasha Ramirez said: \"That sounds wonderful, Emily. Engaging directly with the organizations will certainly bring a unique and invaluable contribution. I'm thankful for your generous heart and tireless commitment to making a difference. Let's enjoy the rest of the gala!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Sasha. Let's indeed make the most of tonight's gala. I'm looking forward to getting to know more about these organizations and possibly finding more ways to contribute in the future. Enjoy the event!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Emily Harrison, your task is to act/speak as Emily Harrison would, keeping in mind Emily Harrison's social goal.\nYou can find Emily Harrison's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Emily Harrison's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Emily Harrison's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals at a charity gala\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Emily Harrison\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. \nEmily Harrison's background: Emily Harrison is a 32-year-old female librarian. She/her pronouns. In Emily's free time, she enjoys writing and is an avid reader. Early in the mornings, she can be seen in the local park, taking long, contemplative walks. Personality and values description: Emily Harrison is creative, thoughtful, and introverted. She values caring, often relying on her intuition to make decisions. Emily's secrets: Secretly writes romance novels under a pseudonym\nSasha Ramirez's goal: Unknown\nEmily Harrison's goal: Maintain financial stability while supporting causes (Extra information: you have a certain budget for donations this year and have already made several donations. You are only thinking of donating $2000 max)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Good evening Emily, you look stunning tonight. Have you had a chance to look over the charity organizations we're supporting this evening?\"\n\nTurn #1: Emily Harrison said: \"Thank you for the compliment, Sasha. Yes, I've taken a look at the wonderful organizations involved tonight. I'm truly impressed by their work and dedication, and I'm considering making a donation, nicely within my budget, of course.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"That's excellent, Emily! I'm happy to hear you're considering a donation. One cause I\u2019d particularly like to draw your attention to focuses on improving the lives of young children. It\u2019s a brilliant opportunity for budding minds to get the start they deserve in life. Of course, the minimum donation is set at a considerable amount of $3000, but every penny goes a long way in making a life-altering difference for these children. As a police officer, I've seen firsthand what a lack of resources can lead to, and it's our responsibility as members of this community to step up and help where we can.\"\n\nTurn #3: Emily Harrison said: \"I completely agree with you, Sasha. The cause you've highlighted sounds truly meaningful, and it's amazing to see the impact we can have on these children's lives. But, considering that I've to maintain a balance with my commitments to other causes as well, I was planning on donating a sum of $2000 tonight. I understand it's below the recommended amount, but I hope it will still contribute positively in some way. It\u2019s wonderful how we, as a community, can bring about changes, no matter how small they may seem.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Emily, every contribution, no matter the amount, is greatly appreciated and impactful. However, I'd like to point out that the additional $1000, if possible, could fund a child's basic necessities for an entire month. That said, I completely understand if you have commitments to other causes. Would you consider splitting your contribution across two galas, perhaps donating the other $1000 at our next event?\"\n\nTurn #5: Emily Harrison said: \"Sasha, I appreciate your passion and dedication to these wonderful causes. The idea of splitting my donation is certainly an interesting one, but I'm afraid I have to stay mindful of my budget. $2000 is the maximum total amount I had set aside for donations this year, regardless of how it's split up. I'd like to stick to that, even though I understand and appreciate the immense benefits that a higher donation could bring. I hope it's clear that it's not a lack of willingness, but more a matter of maintaining financial stability at my end. In the mean time, I'll certainly consider other ways to support these brilliant causes maybe with my time or resources.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Emily, it's clear you have a good heart and totally understand about maintaining financial stability. Your plan to donate $2000 is already immensely generous and will certainly make a difference. I just wanted to ensure you were aware of the child-focused cause and its needs. Your offer to contribute time and resources is also a wonderful alternative and deeply appreciated. The charity could definitely use more hands-on-deck. Thank you for considering, Emily.\"\n\nTurn #7: Emily Harrison said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Sasha, and thank you for promoting such impactful causes. Let's continue our efforts and do the best we can with the resources we have. I'm looking forward to offering more than just financial aid, perhaps by engaging directly with these organizations in the time to come.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sasha Ramirez said: \"That sounds wonderful, Emily. Engaging directly with the organizations will certainly bring a unique and invaluable contribution. I'm thankful for your generous heart and tireless commitment to making a difference. Let's enjoy the rest of the gala!\"\n\nTurn #9: Emily Harrison said: \"Thank you, Sasha. Let's indeed make the most of tonight's gala. I'm looking forward to getting to know more about these organizations and possibly finding more ways to contribute in the future. Enjoy the event!\"\n\nTurn #10: Sasha Ramirez left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Eli Dawson, your task is to act/speak as Eli Dawson would, keeping in mind Eli Dawson's social goal.\nYou can find Eli Dawson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Eli Dawson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Eli Dawson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: An individual is trying to persuade their friend to donate to a charity supporting children in conflict zones.\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Ethan Smith\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. Eli's secrets: He secretly funds a college student\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nEli Dawson's goal: Convince a friend to donate (Extra information: you have been deeply moved by the plight of children in Syria and want to help.)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ethan, I've come across a charitable trust that works tirelessly in supporting children in conflict zones. Considering your values of fairness and universalism, I thought you might be interested in helping them.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Eli Dawson, your task is to act/speak as Eli Dawson would, keeping in mind Eli Dawson's social goal.\nYou can find Eli Dawson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Eli Dawson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Eli Dawson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: An individual is trying to persuade their friend to donate to a charity supporting children in conflict zones.\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Ethan Smith\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. Eli's secrets: He secretly funds a college student\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nEli Dawson's goal: Convince a friend to donate (Extra information: you have been deeply moved by the plight of children in Syria and want to help.)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, I've come across a charitable trust that works tirelessly in supporting children in conflict zones. Considering your values of fairness and universalism, I thought you might be interested in helping them.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Eli, I truly appreciate you thinking of me for this cause. Supporting children, especially in such circumstances, is indeed a cause close to my heart. However, I've already committed my resources to a few charities, and I need to ensure I'm managing my personal finances well. I would like to know more about this charitable trust though, maybe there's some other way I can help.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I completely understand your financial considerations, Ethan. The organization is called 'ChildAid' and they not only accept monetary assistance but also appreciate contributions in kind. They have centers where you could donate books, clothes, and even technological devices which they will then deliver to the kids in these zones. Interestingly, they also value intellectual donations, such as volunteering for teaching coding to these underprivileged children. Given your background, that could truly make a meaningful difference.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Eli Dawson, your task is to act/speak as Eli Dawson would, keeping in mind Eli Dawson's social goal.\nYou can find Eli Dawson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Eli Dawson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Eli Dawson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: An individual is trying to persuade their friend to donate to a charity supporting children in conflict zones.\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Ethan Smith\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. Eli's secrets: He secretly funds a college student\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nEli Dawson's goal: Convince a friend to donate (Extra information: you have been deeply moved by the plight of children in Syria and want to help.)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, I've come across a charitable trust that works tirelessly in supporting children in conflict zones. Considering your values of fairness and universalism, I thought you might be interested in helping them.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Eli, I truly appreciate you thinking of me for this cause. Supporting children, especially in such circumstances, is indeed a cause close to my heart. However, I've already committed my resources to a few charities, and I need to ensure I'm managing my personal finances well. I would like to know more about this charitable trust though, maybe there's some other way I can help.\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"I completely understand your financial considerations, Ethan. The organization is called 'ChildAid' and they not only accept monetary assistance but also appreciate contributions in kind. They have centers where you could donate books, clothes, and even technological devices which they will then deliver to the kids in these zones. Interestingly, they also value intellectual donations, such as volunteering for teaching coding to these underprivileged children. Given your background, that could truly make a meaningful difference.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"That sounds incredibly rewarding, Eli. While I might not be able to contribute financially right now, I'd love to contribute in kind or volunteer my time instead. Teaching coding seems like a very interesting opportunity. Could you provide more information about how I could get involved in this?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Absolutely, Ethan. I can give you a contact at ChildAid who can guide you through the process of getting involved. They would certainly appreciate someone with your expertise willing to donate their time. Additionally, they frequently operate drives to collect books, clothes, and tech, so you could contribute in kind as per your convenience. And above all, remember, every contribution, no matter how small, makes a significant difference.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Eli Dawson, your task is to act/speak as Eli Dawson would, keeping in mind Eli Dawson's social goal.\nYou can find Eli Dawson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Eli Dawson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Eli Dawson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: An individual is trying to persuade their friend to donate to a charity supporting children in conflict zones.\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Ethan Smith\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. Eli's secrets: He secretly funds a college student\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nEli Dawson's goal: Convince a friend to donate (Extra information: you have been deeply moved by the plight of children in Syria and want to help.)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, I've come across a charitable trust that works tirelessly in supporting children in conflict zones. Considering your values of fairness and universalism, I thought you might be interested in helping them.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Eli, I truly appreciate you thinking of me for this cause. Supporting children, especially in such circumstances, is indeed a cause close to my heart. However, I've already committed my resources to a few charities, and I need to ensure I'm managing my personal finances well. I would like to know more about this charitable trust though, maybe there's some other way I can help.\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"I completely understand your financial considerations, Ethan. The organization is called 'ChildAid' and they not only accept monetary assistance but also appreciate contributions in kind. They have centers where you could donate books, clothes, and even technological devices which they will then deliver to the kids in these zones. Interestingly, they also value intellectual donations, such as volunteering for teaching coding to these underprivileged children. Given your background, that could truly make a meaningful difference.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"That sounds incredibly rewarding, Eli. While I might not be able to contribute financially right now, I'd love to contribute in kind or volunteer my time instead. Teaching coding seems like a very interesting opportunity. Could you provide more information about how I could get involved in this?\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. I can give you a contact at ChildAid who can guide you through the process of getting involved. They would certainly appreciate someone with your expertise willing to donate their time. Additionally, they frequently operate drives to collect books, clothes, and tech, so you could contribute in kind as per your convenience. And above all, remember, every contribution, no matter how small, makes a significant difference.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"I truly appreciate this information, Eli. I'll reach out to your contact at ChildAid and gather information on volunteer teaching and in-kind contributions. As a software developer, equipping underprivileged children with coding skills is an exciting prospect for me. And I'm sure I can gather some books and tech to donate as well. Thank you for the opportunity to get involved in a cause that means a lot to me.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's wonderful to hear, Ethan. I admire your enthusiasm to making a difference in their lives. Should you need any further information or assistance regarding ChildAid, feel free to reach out to me anytime. We're in this together, after all.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Eli Dawson, your task is to act/speak as Eli Dawson would, keeping in mind Eli Dawson's social goal.\nYou can find Eli Dawson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Eli Dawson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Eli Dawson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: An individual is trying to persuade their friend to donate to a charity supporting children in conflict zones.\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Ethan Smith\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. Eli's secrets: He secretly funds a college student\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nEli Dawson's goal: Convince a friend to donate (Extra information: you have been deeply moved by the plight of children in Syria and want to help.)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, I've come across a charitable trust that works tirelessly in supporting children in conflict zones. Considering your values of fairness and universalism, I thought you might be interested in helping them.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Eli, I truly appreciate you thinking of me for this cause. Supporting children, especially in such circumstances, is indeed a cause close to my heart. However, I've already committed my resources to a few charities, and I need to ensure I'm managing my personal finances well. I would like to know more about this charitable trust though, maybe there's some other way I can help.\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"I completely understand your financial considerations, Ethan. The organization is called 'ChildAid' and they not only accept monetary assistance but also appreciate contributions in kind. They have centers where you could donate books, clothes, and even technological devices which they will then deliver to the kids in these zones. Interestingly, they also value intellectual donations, such as volunteering for teaching coding to these underprivileged children. Given your background, that could truly make a meaningful difference.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"That sounds incredibly rewarding, Eli. While I might not be able to contribute financially right now, I'd love to contribute in kind or volunteer my time instead. Teaching coding seems like a very interesting opportunity. Could you provide more information about how I could get involved in this?\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. I can give you a contact at ChildAid who can guide you through the process of getting involved. They would certainly appreciate someone with your expertise willing to donate their time. Additionally, they frequently operate drives to collect books, clothes, and tech, so you could contribute in kind as per your convenience. And above all, remember, every contribution, no matter how small, makes a significant difference.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"I truly appreciate this information, Eli. I'll reach out to your contact at ChildAid and gather information on volunteer teaching and in-kind contributions. As a software developer, equipping underprivileged children with coding skills is an exciting prospect for me. And I'm sure I can gather some books and tech to donate as well. Thank you for the opportunity to get involved in a cause that means a lot to me.\"\n\nTurn #6: Eli Dawson said: \"That's wonderful to hear, Ethan. I admire your enthusiasm to making a difference in their lives. Should you need any further information or assistance regarding ChildAid, feel free to reach out to me anytime. We're in this together, after all.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"You've been great help, Eli. I'm eager to see how I can contribute to ChildAid. I'll definitely let you know if I need any further information or assistance. Thanks again for bringing this opportunity to my attention.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're welcome, Ethan. I'm glad I could help you find a way to make a difference. Don't hesitate to contact me if you need any more information or have any questions about ChildAid. I look forward to hearing about your work with them.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Eli Dawson, your task is to act/speak as Eli Dawson would, keeping in mind Eli Dawson's social goal.\nYou can find Eli Dawson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Eli Dawson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Eli Dawson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: An individual is trying to persuade their friend to donate to a charity supporting children in conflict zones.\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Ethan Smith\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. Eli's secrets: He secretly funds a college student\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nEli Dawson's goal: Convince a friend to donate (Extra information: you have been deeply moved by the plight of children in Syria and want to help.)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, I've come across a charitable trust that works tirelessly in supporting children in conflict zones. Considering your values of fairness and universalism, I thought you might be interested in helping them.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Eli, I truly appreciate you thinking of me for this cause. Supporting children, especially in such circumstances, is indeed a cause close to my heart. However, I've already committed my resources to a few charities, and I need to ensure I'm managing my personal finances well. I would like to know more about this charitable trust though, maybe there's some other way I can help.\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"I completely understand your financial considerations, Ethan. The organization is called 'ChildAid' and they not only accept monetary assistance but also appreciate contributions in kind. They have centers where you could donate books, clothes, and even technological devices which they will then deliver to the kids in these zones. Interestingly, they also value intellectual donations, such as volunteering for teaching coding to these underprivileged children. Given your background, that could truly make a meaningful difference.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"That sounds incredibly rewarding, Eli. While I might not be able to contribute financially right now, I'd love to contribute in kind or volunteer my time instead. Teaching coding seems like a very interesting opportunity. Could you provide more information about how I could get involved in this?\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. I can give you a contact at ChildAid who can guide you through the process of getting involved. They would certainly appreciate someone with your expertise willing to donate their time. Additionally, they frequently operate drives to collect books, clothes, and tech, so you could contribute in kind as per your convenience. And above all, remember, every contribution, no matter how small, makes a significant difference.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"I truly appreciate this information, Eli. I'll reach out to your contact at ChildAid and gather information on volunteer teaching and in-kind contributions. As a software developer, equipping underprivileged children with coding skills is an exciting prospect for me. And I'm sure I can gather some books and tech to donate as well. Thank you for the opportunity to get involved in a cause that means a lot to me.\"\n\nTurn #6: Eli Dawson said: \"That's wonderful to hear, Ethan. I admire your enthusiasm to making a difference in their lives. Should you need any further information or assistance regarding ChildAid, feel free to reach out to me anytime. We're in this together, after all.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"You've been great help, Eli. I'm eager to see how I can contribute to ChildAid. I'll definitely let you know if I need any further information or assistance. Thanks again for bringing this opportunity to my attention.\"\n\nTurn #8: Eli Dawson said: \"You're welcome, Ethan. I'm glad I could help you find a way to make a difference. Don't hesitate to contact me if you need any more information or have any questions about ChildAid. I look forward to hearing about your work with them.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith said: \"Thank you, Eli. I'll be sure to touch base if I have any questions or need further information. Looking forward to making a positive impact with ChildAid. I'll keep you posted on my work with them. Have a great day!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds like a plan, Ethan. I'm glad you're as excited as I am about making a difference with ChildAid. I'm sure your skill and generosity will greatly benefit these kids. Let's keep in touch about the progress. Have a splendid day!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Eli Dawson, your task is to act/speak as Eli Dawson would, keeping in mind Eli Dawson's social goal.\nYou can find Eli Dawson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Eli Dawson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Eli Dawson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: An individual is trying to persuade their friend to donate to a charity supporting children in conflict zones.\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Ethan Smith\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. Eli's secrets: He secretly funds a college student\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nEli Dawson's goal: Convince a friend to donate (Extra information: you have been deeply moved by the plight of children in Syria and want to help.)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, I've come across a charitable trust that works tirelessly in supporting children in conflict zones. Considering your values of fairness and universalism, I thought you might be interested in helping them.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Eli, I truly appreciate you thinking of me for this cause. Supporting children, especially in such circumstances, is indeed a cause close to my heart. However, I've already committed my resources to a few charities, and I need to ensure I'm managing my personal finances well. I would like to know more about this charitable trust though, maybe there's some other way I can help.\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"I completely understand your financial considerations, Ethan. The organization is called 'ChildAid' and they not only accept monetary assistance but also appreciate contributions in kind. They have centers where you could donate books, clothes, and even technological devices which they will then deliver to the kids in these zones. Interestingly, they also value intellectual donations, such as volunteering for teaching coding to these underprivileged children. Given your background, that could truly make a meaningful difference.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"That sounds incredibly rewarding, Eli. While I might not be able to contribute financially right now, I'd love to contribute in kind or volunteer my time instead. Teaching coding seems like a very interesting opportunity. Could you provide more information about how I could get involved in this?\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. I can give you a contact at ChildAid who can guide you through the process of getting involved. They would certainly appreciate someone with your expertise willing to donate their time. Additionally, they frequently operate drives to collect books, clothes, and tech, so you could contribute in kind as per your convenience. And above all, remember, every contribution, no matter how small, makes a significant difference.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"I truly appreciate this information, Eli. I'll reach out to your contact at ChildAid and gather information on volunteer teaching and in-kind contributions. As a software developer, equipping underprivileged children with coding skills is an exciting prospect for me. And I'm sure I can gather some books and tech to donate as well. Thank you for the opportunity to get involved in a cause that means a lot to me.\"\n\nTurn #6: Eli Dawson said: \"That's wonderful to hear, Ethan. I admire your enthusiasm to making a difference in their lives. Should you need any further information or assistance regarding ChildAid, feel free to reach out to me anytime. We're in this together, after all.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"You've been great help, Eli. I'm eager to see how I can contribute to ChildAid. I'll definitely let you know if I need any further information or assistance. Thanks again for bringing this opportunity to my attention.\"\n\nTurn #8: Eli Dawson said: \"You're welcome, Ethan. I'm glad I could help you find a way to make a difference. Don't hesitate to contact me if you need any more information or have any questions about ChildAid. I look forward to hearing about your work with them.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith said: \"Thank you, Eli. I'll be sure to touch base if I have any questions or need further information. Looking forward to making a positive impact with ChildAid. I'll keep you posted on my work with them. Have a great day!\"\n\nTurn #10: Eli Dawson said: \"That sounds like a plan, Ethan. I'm glad you're as excited as I am about making a difference with ChildAid. I'm sure your skill and generosity will greatly benefit these kids. Let's keep in touch about the progress. Have a splendid day!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Smith left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: An individual is trying to persuade their friend to donate to a charity supporting children in conflict zones.\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Ethan Smith\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nEli Dawson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Be supportive but also manage personal finances (Extra information: you are sympathetic to the cause but also have financial commitments to deal with.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, I've come across a charitable trust that works tirelessly in supporting children in conflict zones. Considering your values of fairness and universalism, I thought you might be interested in helping them.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Eli, I truly appreciate you thinking of me for this cause. Supporting children, especially in such circumstances, is indeed a cause close to my heart. However, I've already committed my resources to a few charities, and I need to ensure I'm managing my personal finances well. I would like to know more about this charitable trust though, maybe there's some other way I can help.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: An individual is trying to persuade their friend to donate to a charity supporting children in conflict zones.\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Ethan Smith\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nEli Dawson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Be supportive but also manage personal finances (Extra information: you are sympathetic to the cause but also have financial commitments to deal with.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, I've come across a charitable trust that works tirelessly in supporting children in conflict zones. Considering your values of fairness and universalism, I thought you might be interested in helping them.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Eli, I truly appreciate you thinking of me for this cause. Supporting children, especially in such circumstances, is indeed a cause close to my heart. However, I've already committed my resources to a few charities, and I need to ensure I'm managing my personal finances well. I would like to know more about this charitable trust though, maybe there's some other way I can help.\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"I completely understand your financial considerations, Ethan. The organization is called 'ChildAid' and they not only accept monetary assistance but also appreciate contributions in kind. They have centers where you could donate books, clothes, and even technological devices which they will then deliver to the kids in these zones. Interestingly, they also value intellectual donations, such as volunteering for teaching coding to these underprivileged children. Given your background, that could truly make a meaningful difference.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds incredibly rewarding, Eli. While I might not be able to contribute financially right now, I'd love to contribute in kind or volunteer my time instead. Teaching coding seems like a very interesting opportunity. Could you provide more information about how I could get involved in this?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: An individual is trying to persuade their friend to donate to a charity supporting children in conflict zones.\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Ethan Smith\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nEli Dawson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Be supportive but also manage personal finances (Extra information: you are sympathetic to the cause but also have financial commitments to deal with.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, I've come across a charitable trust that works tirelessly in supporting children in conflict zones. Considering your values of fairness and universalism, I thought you might be interested in helping them.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Eli, I truly appreciate you thinking of me for this cause. Supporting children, especially in such circumstances, is indeed a cause close to my heart. However, I've already committed my resources to a few charities, and I need to ensure I'm managing my personal finances well. I would like to know more about this charitable trust though, maybe there's some other way I can help.\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"I completely understand your financial considerations, Ethan. The organization is called 'ChildAid' and they not only accept monetary assistance but also appreciate contributions in kind. They have centers where you could donate books, clothes, and even technological devices which they will then deliver to the kids in these zones. Interestingly, they also value intellectual donations, such as volunteering for teaching coding to these underprivileged children. Given your background, that could truly make a meaningful difference.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"That sounds incredibly rewarding, Eli. While I might not be able to contribute financially right now, I'd love to contribute in kind or volunteer my time instead. Teaching coding seems like a very interesting opportunity. Could you provide more information about how I could get involved in this?\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. I can give you a contact at ChildAid who can guide you through the process of getting involved. They would certainly appreciate someone with your expertise willing to donate their time. Additionally, they frequently operate drives to collect books, clothes, and tech, so you could contribute in kind as per your convenience. And above all, remember, every contribution, no matter how small, makes a significant difference.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I truly appreciate this information, Eli. I'll reach out to your contact at ChildAid and gather information on volunteer teaching and in-kind contributions. As a software developer, equipping underprivileged children with coding skills is an exciting prospect for me. And I'm sure I can gather some books and tech to donate as well. Thank you for the opportunity to get involved in a cause that means a lot to me.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: An individual is trying to persuade their friend to donate to a charity supporting children in conflict zones.\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Ethan Smith\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nEli Dawson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Be supportive but also manage personal finances (Extra information: you are sympathetic to the cause but also have financial commitments to deal with.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, I've come across a charitable trust that works tirelessly in supporting children in conflict zones. Considering your values of fairness and universalism, I thought you might be interested in helping them.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Eli, I truly appreciate you thinking of me for this cause. Supporting children, especially in such circumstances, is indeed a cause close to my heart. However, I've already committed my resources to a few charities, and I need to ensure I'm managing my personal finances well. I would like to know more about this charitable trust though, maybe there's some other way I can help.\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"I completely understand your financial considerations, Ethan. The organization is called 'ChildAid' and they not only accept monetary assistance but also appreciate contributions in kind. They have centers where you could donate books, clothes, and even technological devices which they will then deliver to the kids in these zones. Interestingly, they also value intellectual donations, such as volunteering for teaching coding to these underprivileged children. Given your background, that could truly make a meaningful difference.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"That sounds incredibly rewarding, Eli. While I might not be able to contribute financially right now, I'd love to contribute in kind or volunteer my time instead. Teaching coding seems like a very interesting opportunity. Could you provide more information about how I could get involved in this?\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. I can give you a contact at ChildAid who can guide you through the process of getting involved. They would certainly appreciate someone with your expertise willing to donate their time. Additionally, they frequently operate drives to collect books, clothes, and tech, so you could contribute in kind as per your convenience. And above all, remember, every contribution, no matter how small, makes a significant difference.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"I truly appreciate this information, Eli. I'll reach out to your contact at ChildAid and gather information on volunteer teaching and in-kind contributions. As a software developer, equipping underprivileged children with coding skills is an exciting prospect for me. And I'm sure I can gather some books and tech to donate as well. Thank you for the opportunity to get involved in a cause that means a lot to me.\"\n\nTurn #6: Eli Dawson said: \"That's wonderful to hear, Ethan. I admire your enthusiasm to making a difference in their lives. Should you need any further information or assistance regarding ChildAid, feel free to reach out to me anytime. We're in this together, after all.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You've been great help, Eli. I'm eager to see how I can contribute to ChildAid. I'll definitely let you know if I need any further information or assistance. Thanks again for bringing this opportunity to my attention.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: An individual is trying to persuade their friend to donate to a charity supporting children in conflict zones.\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Ethan Smith\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nEli Dawson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Be supportive but also manage personal finances (Extra information: you are sympathetic to the cause but also have financial commitments to deal with.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, I've come across a charitable trust that works tirelessly in supporting children in conflict zones. Considering your values of fairness and universalism, I thought you might be interested in helping them.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Eli, I truly appreciate you thinking of me for this cause. Supporting children, especially in such circumstances, is indeed a cause close to my heart. However, I've already committed my resources to a few charities, and I need to ensure I'm managing my personal finances well. I would like to know more about this charitable trust though, maybe there's some other way I can help.\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"I completely understand your financial considerations, Ethan. The organization is called 'ChildAid' and they not only accept monetary assistance but also appreciate contributions in kind. They have centers where you could donate books, clothes, and even technological devices which they will then deliver to the kids in these zones. Interestingly, they also value intellectual donations, such as volunteering for teaching coding to these underprivileged children. Given your background, that could truly make a meaningful difference.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"That sounds incredibly rewarding, Eli. While I might not be able to contribute financially right now, I'd love to contribute in kind or volunteer my time instead. Teaching coding seems like a very interesting opportunity. Could you provide more information about how I could get involved in this?\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. I can give you a contact at ChildAid who can guide you through the process of getting involved. They would certainly appreciate someone with your expertise willing to donate their time. Additionally, they frequently operate drives to collect books, clothes, and tech, so you could contribute in kind as per your convenience. And above all, remember, every contribution, no matter how small, makes a significant difference.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"I truly appreciate this information, Eli. I'll reach out to your contact at ChildAid and gather information on volunteer teaching and in-kind contributions. As a software developer, equipping underprivileged children with coding skills is an exciting prospect for me. And I'm sure I can gather some books and tech to donate as well. Thank you for the opportunity to get involved in a cause that means a lot to me.\"\n\nTurn #6: Eli Dawson said: \"That's wonderful to hear, Ethan. I admire your enthusiasm to making a difference in their lives. Should you need any further information or assistance regarding ChildAid, feel free to reach out to me anytime. We're in this together, after all.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"You've been great help, Eli. I'm eager to see how I can contribute to ChildAid. I'll definitely let you know if I need any further information or assistance. Thanks again for bringing this opportunity to my attention.\"\n\nTurn #8: Eli Dawson said: \"You're welcome, Ethan. I'm glad I could help you find a way to make a difference. Don't hesitate to contact me if you need any more information or have any questions about ChildAid. I look forward to hearing about your work with them.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Eli. I'll be sure to touch base if I have any questions or need further information. Looking forward to making a positive impact with ChildAid. I'll keep you posted on my work with them. Have a great day!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: An individual is trying to persuade their friend to donate to a charity supporting children in conflict zones.\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Ethan Smith\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nEli Dawson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Be supportive but also manage personal finances (Extra information: you are sympathetic to the cause but also have financial commitments to deal with.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, I've come across a charitable trust that works tirelessly in supporting children in conflict zones. Considering your values of fairness and universalism, I thought you might be interested in helping them.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Eli, I truly appreciate you thinking of me for this cause. Supporting children, especially in such circumstances, is indeed a cause close to my heart. However, I've already committed my resources to a few charities, and I need to ensure I'm managing my personal finances well. I would like to know more about this charitable trust though, maybe there's some other way I can help.\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"I completely understand your financial considerations, Ethan. The organization is called 'ChildAid' and they not only accept monetary assistance but also appreciate contributions in kind. They have centers where you could donate books, clothes, and even technological devices which they will then deliver to the kids in these zones. Interestingly, they also value intellectual donations, such as volunteering for teaching coding to these underprivileged children. Given your background, that could truly make a meaningful difference.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"That sounds incredibly rewarding, Eli. While I might not be able to contribute financially right now, I'd love to contribute in kind or volunteer my time instead. Teaching coding seems like a very interesting opportunity. Could you provide more information about how I could get involved in this?\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. I can give you a contact at ChildAid who can guide you through the process of getting involved. They would certainly appreciate someone with your expertise willing to donate their time. Additionally, they frequently operate drives to collect books, clothes, and tech, so you could contribute in kind as per your convenience. And above all, remember, every contribution, no matter how small, makes a significant difference.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"I truly appreciate this information, Eli. I'll reach out to your contact at ChildAid and gather information on volunteer teaching and in-kind contributions. As a software developer, equipping underprivileged children with coding skills is an exciting prospect for me. And I'm sure I can gather some books and tech to donate as well. Thank you for the opportunity to get involved in a cause that means a lot to me.\"\n\nTurn #6: Eli Dawson said: \"That's wonderful to hear, Ethan. I admire your enthusiasm to making a difference in their lives. Should you need any further information or assistance regarding ChildAid, feel free to reach out to me anytime. We're in this together, after all.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"You've been great help, Eli. I'm eager to see how I can contribute to ChildAid. I'll definitely let you know if I need any further information or assistance. Thanks again for bringing this opportunity to my attention.\"\n\nTurn #8: Eli Dawson said: \"You're welcome, Ethan. I'm glad I could help you find a way to make a difference. Don't hesitate to contact me if you need any more information or have any questions about ChildAid. I look forward to hearing about your work with them.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith said: \"Thank you, Eli. I'll be sure to touch base if I have any questions or need further information. Looking forward to making a positive impact with ChildAid. I'll keep you posted on my work with them. Have a great day!\"\n\nTurn #10: Eli Dawson said: \"That sounds like a plan, Ethan. I'm glad you're as excited as I am about making a difference with ChildAid. I'm sure your skill and generosity will greatly benefit these kids. Let's keep in touch about the progress. Have a splendid day!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates are having a disagreement over noise levels in their shared apartment.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Noah Davis\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. \nLeo Williams's goal: Convince your roommate to lower the noise (Extra information: you have an important online meeting tomorrow morning and you need a quiet environment to prepare)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Noah, I'd love to chat about the noise levels in our apartment if you have a moment. I have an important online meeting tomorrow morning and I need a bit of quiet to prepare. Is there anything we could work out?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Leo, I totally understand your need for quiet, especially with your important meeting coming up. As you know, I usually unwind after a long day with some music, but obviously I want to respect your need for quiet. How about a compromise? I can use headphones or maybe take a break during your meeting. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'That sounds like a great solution, Noah. Using headphones would definitely help, and if you could take a break during the actual meeting, that would be very much appreciated. Thank you for understanding, and being flexible about this issue.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates are having a disagreement over noise levels in their shared apartment.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Noah Davis\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. \nLeo Williams's goal: Convince your roommate to lower the noise (Extra information: you have an important online meeting tomorrow morning and you need a quiet environment to prepare)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Noah, I'd love to chat about the noise levels in our apartment if you have a moment. I have an important online meeting tomorrow morning and I need a bit of quiet to prepare. Is there anything we could work out?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates are having a disagreement over noise levels in their shared apartment.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Noah Davis\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. \nLeo Williams's goal: Convince your roommate to lower the noise (Extra information: you have an important online meeting tomorrow morning and you need a quiet environment to prepare)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Noah, I'd love to chat about the noise levels in our apartment if you have a moment. I have an important online meeting tomorrow morning and I need a bit of quiet to prepare. Is there anything we could work out?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Leo, I totally understand your need for quiet, especially with your important meeting coming up. As you know, I usually unwind after a long day with some music, but obviously I want to respect your need for quiet. How about a compromise? I can use headphones or maybe take a break during your meeting. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"That sounds like a great solution, Noah. Using headphones would definitely help, and if you could take a break during the actual meeting, that would be very much appreciated. Thank you for understanding, and being flexible about this issue.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I'm glad we could find a solution that works for both of us, Leo. I'll make sure to use headphones and take a break during your meeting. And if ever the noise is still bothering you, feel free to let me know. I'm always open to more adjustments that will make our living situation better for both of us.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I really appreciate that, Noah. Living together in harmony is really important to me. Thanks for being so considerate and let's carry this cooperation forward in any future situations as well.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates are having a disagreement over noise levels in their shared apartment.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Noah Davis\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. \nLeo Williams's goal: Convince your roommate to lower the noise (Extra information: you have an important online meeting tomorrow morning and you need a quiet environment to prepare)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Noah, I'd love to chat about the noise levels in our apartment if you have a moment. I have an important online meeting tomorrow morning and I need a bit of quiet to prepare. Is there anything we could work out?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Leo, I totally understand your need for quiet, especially with your important meeting coming up. As you know, I usually unwind after a long day with some music, but obviously I want to respect your need for quiet. How about a compromise? I can use headphones or maybe take a break during your meeting. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"That sounds like a great solution, Noah. Using headphones would definitely help, and if you could take a break during the actual meeting, that would be very much appreciated. Thank you for understanding, and being flexible about this issue.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I'm glad we could find a solution that works for both of us, Leo. I'll make sure to use headphones and take a break during your meeting. And if ever the noise is still bothering you, feel free to let me know. I'm always open to more adjustments that will make our living situation better for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"I really appreciate that, Noah. Living together in harmony is really important to me. Thanks for being so considerate and let's carry this cooperation forward in any future situations as well.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Leo. I also believe in living together harmoniously, and I'm glad we could find a solution that suits both of us. Remember, my door is always open if you ever need to talk about anything else. Good luck with your meeting tomorrow!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I feel reassured by your response, Noah. It is such a relief to have a cooperative roommate like you. And same applies to you, if you ever need to talk about something, just let me know. Together, we can always find a solution. Now, I'll get back to preparing for the meeting. Thanks again for understanding, Noah.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates are having a disagreement over noise levels in their shared apartment.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Noah Davis\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. \nLeo Williams's goal: Convince your roommate to lower the noise (Extra information: you have an important online meeting tomorrow morning and you need a quiet environment to prepare)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Noah, I'd love to chat about the noise levels in our apartment if you have a moment. I have an important online meeting tomorrow morning and I need a bit of quiet to prepare. Is there anything we could work out?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Leo, I totally understand your need for quiet, especially with your important meeting coming up. As you know, I usually unwind after a long day with some music, but obviously I want to respect your need for quiet. How about a compromise? I can use headphones or maybe take a break during your meeting. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"That sounds like a great solution, Noah. Using headphones would definitely help, and if you could take a break during the actual meeting, that would be very much appreciated. Thank you for understanding, and being flexible about this issue.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I'm glad we could find a solution that works for both of us, Leo. I'll make sure to use headphones and take a break during your meeting. And if ever the noise is still bothering you, feel free to let me know. I'm always open to more adjustments that will make our living situation better for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"I really appreciate that, Noah. Living together in harmony is really important to me. Thanks for being so considerate and let's carry this cooperation forward in any future situations as well.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Leo. I also believe in living together harmoniously, and I'm glad we could find a solution that suits both of us. Remember, my door is always open if you ever need to talk about anything else. Good luck with your meeting tomorrow!\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"I feel reassured by your response, Noah. It is such a relief to have a cooperative roommate like you. And same applies to you, if you ever need to talk about something, just let me know. Together, we can always find a solution. Now, I'll get back to preparing for the meeting. Thanks again for understanding, Noah.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"I really appreciate that too, Leo. Let us always keep this spirit of cooperation and mutual respect going. And thank you for the good wishes. Now, let's both get back to our routines. Feel free to reach out anytime you need.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates are having a disagreement over noise levels in their shared apartment.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Noah Davis\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Defend your right to play music in your own room, but also keep the peace in the apartment (Extra information: you find playing music relaxing and it's your way to unwind after a long day. Hint: you may want to suggest a compromise, like using headphones or playing music only during certain hours.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Noah, I'd love to chat about the noise levels in our apartment if you have a moment. I have an important online meeting tomorrow morning and I need a bit of quiet to prepare. Is there anything we could work out?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Hey Leo, I totally understand your need for quiet, especially with your important meeting coming up. As you know, I usually unwind after a long day with some music, but obviously I want to respect your need for quiet. How about a compromise? I can use headphones or maybe take a break during your meeting. What do you think?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates are having a disagreement over noise levels in their shared apartment.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Noah Davis\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Defend your right to play music in your own room, but also keep the peace in the apartment (Extra information: you find playing music relaxing and it's your way to unwind after a long day. Hint: you may want to suggest a compromise, like using headphones or playing music only during certain hours.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Noah, I'd love to chat about the noise levels in our apartment if you have a moment. I have an important online meeting tomorrow morning and I need a bit of quiet to prepare. Is there anything we could work out?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Leo, I totally understand your need for quiet, especially with your important meeting coming up. As you know, I usually unwind after a long day with some music, but obviously I want to respect your need for quiet. How about a compromise? I can use headphones or maybe take a break during your meeting. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"That sounds like a great solution, Noah. Using headphones would definitely help, and if you could take a break during the actual meeting, that would be very much appreciated. Thank you for understanding, and being flexible about this issue.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad we could find a solution that works for both of us, Leo. I'll make sure to use headphones and take a break during your meeting. And if ever the noise is still bothering you, feel free to let me know. I'm always open to more adjustments that will make our living situation better for both of us.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates are having a disagreement over noise levels in their shared apartment.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Noah Davis\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Defend your right to play music in your own room, but also keep the peace in the apartment (Extra information: you find playing music relaxing and it's your way to unwind after a long day. Hint: you may want to suggest a compromise, like using headphones or playing music only during certain hours.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Noah, I'd love to chat about the noise levels in our apartment if you have a moment. I have an important online meeting tomorrow morning and I need a bit of quiet to prepare. Is there anything we could work out?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Leo, I totally understand your need for quiet, especially with your important meeting coming up. As you know, I usually unwind after a long day with some music, but obviously I want to respect your need for quiet. How about a compromise? I can use headphones or maybe take a break during your meeting. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"That sounds like a great solution, Noah. Using headphones would definitely help, and if you could take a break during the actual meeting, that would be very much appreciated. Thank you for understanding, and being flexible about this issue.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I'm glad we could find a solution that works for both of us, Leo. I'll make sure to use headphones and take a break during your meeting. And if ever the noise is still bothering you, feel free to let me know. I'm always open to more adjustments that will make our living situation better for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"I really appreciate that, Noah. Living together in harmony is really important to me. Thanks for being so considerate and let's carry this cooperation forward in any future situations as well.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Leo. I also believe in living together harmoniously, and I'm glad we could find a solution that suits both of us. Remember, my door is always open if you ever need to talk about anything else. Good luck with your meeting tomorrow!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates are having a disagreement over noise levels in their shared apartment.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Noah Davis\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Defend your right to play music in your own room, but also keep the peace in the apartment (Extra information: you find playing music relaxing and it's your way to unwind after a long day. Hint: you may want to suggest a compromise, like using headphones or playing music only during certain hours.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Noah, I'd love to chat about the noise levels in our apartment if you have a moment. I have an important online meeting tomorrow morning and I need a bit of quiet to prepare. Is there anything we could work out?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Leo, I totally understand your need for quiet, especially with your important meeting coming up. As you know, I usually unwind after a long day with some music, but obviously I want to respect your need for quiet. How about a compromise? I can use headphones or maybe take a break during your meeting. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"That sounds like a great solution, Noah. Using headphones would definitely help, and if you could take a break during the actual meeting, that would be very much appreciated. Thank you for understanding, and being flexible about this issue.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I'm glad we could find a solution that works for both of us, Leo. I'll make sure to use headphones and take a break during your meeting. And if ever the noise is still bothering you, feel free to let me know. I'm always open to more adjustments that will make our living situation better for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"I really appreciate that, Noah. Living together in harmony is really important to me. Thanks for being so considerate and let's carry this cooperation forward in any future situations as well.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Leo. I also believe in living together harmoniously, and I'm glad we could find a solution that suits both of us. Remember, my door is always open if you ever need to talk about anything else. Good luck with your meeting tomorrow!\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"I feel reassured by your response, Noah. It is such a relief to have a cooperative roommate like you. And same applies to you, if you ever need to talk about something, just let me know. Together, we can always find a solution. Now, I'll get back to preparing for the meeting. Thanks again for understanding, Noah.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I really appreciate that too, Leo. Let us always keep this spirit of cooperation and mutual respect going. And thank you for the good wishes. Now, let's both get back to our routines. Feel free to reach out anytime you need.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates are having a disagreement over noise levels in their shared apartment.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Noah Davis\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Defend your right to play music in your own room, but also keep the peace in the apartment (Extra information: you find playing music relaxing and it's your way to unwind after a long day. Hint: you may want to suggest a compromise, like using headphones or playing music only during certain hours.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Noah, I'd love to chat about the noise levels in our apartment if you have a moment. I have an important online meeting tomorrow morning and I need a bit of quiet to prepare. Is there anything we could work out?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Leo, I totally understand your need for quiet, especially with your important meeting coming up. As you know, I usually unwind after a long day with some music, but obviously I want to respect your need for quiet. How about a compromise? I can use headphones or maybe take a break during your meeting. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"That sounds like a great solution, Noah. Using headphones would definitely help, and if you could take a break during the actual meeting, that would be very much appreciated. Thank you for understanding, and being flexible about this issue.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I'm glad we could find a solution that works for both of us, Leo. I'll make sure to use headphones and take a break during your meeting. And if ever the noise is still bothering you, feel free to let me know. I'm always open to more adjustments that will make our living situation better for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"I really appreciate that, Noah. Living together in harmony is really important to me. Thanks for being so considerate and let's carry this cooperation forward in any future situations as well.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Leo. I also believe in living together harmoniously, and I'm glad we could find a solution that suits both of us. Remember, my door is always open if you ever need to talk about anything else. Good luck with your meeting tomorrow!\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"I feel reassured by your response, Noah. It is such a relief to have a cooperative roommate like you. And same applies to you, if you ever need to talk about something, just let me know. Together, we can always find a solution. Now, I'll get back to preparing for the meeting. Thanks again for understanding, Noah.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"I really appreciate that too, Leo. Let us always keep this spirit of cooperation and mutual respect going. And thank you for the good wishes. Now, let's both get back to our routines. Feel free to reach out anytime you need.\"\n\nTurn #8: Leo Williams left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a social gathering where one friend has brought along their new friend group\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nDonovan Reeves's goal: Introduce your new friend group to your current friend and make them feel comfortable (Extra information: You have recently made a new group of friends who share your interest in outdoor activities and you want your current friend to meet them)\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Ava, it's so great to see you! I wanted to introduce you to my new friends, they're all really into outdoor activities like hiking and camping. I thought we could maybe do a trip together sometime. Come on, I'll introduce you.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a social gathering where one friend has brought along their new friend group\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nDonovan Reeves's goal: Introduce your new friend group to your current friend and make them feel comfortable (Extra information: You have recently made a new group of friends who share your interest in outdoor activities and you want your current friend to meet them)\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Ava, it's so great to see you! I wanted to introduce you to my new friends, they're all really into outdoor activities like hiking and camping. I thought we could maybe do a trip together sometime. Come on, I'll introduce you.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Donovan, it's great to see you too. I'd love to meet your new friends and that outdoor trip sounds super fun. I've been meaning to share something with you though, it seems like you've been spending a lot of time with your new friends. It's awesome that you've found people who share your interests, but I've been feeling a bit left out lately. Maybe we can schedule some time for us to hang out, just like old times, you know?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ava, I'm really sorry if I made you feel that way. It's never my intention to leave you out. These new activities and friends have just given a different flavor to my life which I thought you may enjoy too. But you're absolutely right, our catch-ups are important. How about we schedule some time next week, just you and I? We could have a gaming night just like the old times. And also, let's think of some outdoor activities you might enjoy, so the next time we all go out, you'll feel more included. What do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a social gathering where one friend has brought along their new friend group\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nDonovan Reeves's goal: Introduce your new friend group to your current friend and make them feel comfortable (Extra information: You have recently made a new group of friends who share your interest in outdoor activities and you want your current friend to meet them)\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Ava, it's so great to see you! I wanted to introduce you to my new friends, they're all really into outdoor activities like hiking and camping. I thought we could maybe do a trip together sometime. Come on, I'll introduce you.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Donovan, it's great to see you too. I'd love to meet your new friends and that outdoor trip sounds super fun. I've been meaning to share something with you though, it seems like you've been spending a lot of time with your new friends. It's awesome that you've found people who share your interests, but I've been feeling a bit left out lately. Maybe we can schedule some time for us to hang out, just like old times, you know?\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"Ava, I'm really sorry if I made you feel that way. It's never my intention to leave you out. These new activities and friends have just given a different flavor to my life which I thought you may enjoy too. But you're absolutely right, our catch-ups are important. How about we schedule some time next week, just you and I? We could have a gaming night just like the old times. And also, let's think of some outdoor activities you might enjoy, so the next time we all go out, you'll feel more included. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Thompson said: \"Donovan, thank you for understanding, it's much appreciated. I'd love to schedule a gaming night next week. You know I've not been camping or hiking before, but I'm open to try these outdoor activities. Maybe, I can start with something basic? What about a nature walk or a picnic at a scenic spot? That could be a great way for me to get acquainted with everyone.\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"That sounds like a brilliant idea, Ava. A nature walk or picnic at a scenic spot is a perfect first step and a casual way for you to get to know my new friends. We could even bring some board games to play. And don't worry, there's no pressure for you to become an outdoor enthusiast overnight. Everything at your own pace. Let's start planning, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Thompson said: \"That sounds like a plan, Donovan. Thanks for being so understanding and accommodating, really means a lot. So, about the planning, where shall we start? Maybe we can consider a location convenient for everyone first?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Ava. Choosing a convenient location for everyone is indeed a priority. There's a really beautiful park nearby my place which has a serene lake and plenty of open space for a picnic. It's pretty centrally located so I guess it would be convenient for everyone. Shall we opt for this location? And then, we can move on to deciding the date and food arrangements. How does that sound?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a social gathering where one friend has brought along their new friend group\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nDonovan Reeves's goal: Introduce your new friend group to your current friend and make them feel comfortable (Extra information: You have recently made a new group of friends who share your interest in outdoor activities and you want your current friend to meet them)\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Ava, it's so great to see you! I wanted to introduce you to my new friends, they're all really into outdoor activities like hiking and camping. I thought we could maybe do a trip together sometime. Come on, I'll introduce you.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Donovan, it's great to see you too. I'd love to meet your new friends and that outdoor trip sounds super fun. I've been meaning to share something with you though, it seems like you've been spending a lot of time with your new friends. It's awesome that you've found people who share your interests, but I've been feeling a bit left out lately. Maybe we can schedule some time for us to hang out, just like old times, you know?\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"Ava, I'm really sorry if I made you feel that way. It's never my intention to leave you out. These new activities and friends have just given a different flavor to my life which I thought you may enjoy too. But you're absolutely right, our catch-ups are important. How about we schedule some time next week, just you and I? We could have a gaming night just like the old times. And also, let's think of some outdoor activities you might enjoy, so the next time we all go out, you'll feel more included. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Thompson said: \"Donovan, thank you for understanding, it's much appreciated. I'd love to schedule a gaming night next week. You know I've not been camping or hiking before, but I'm open to try these outdoor activities. Maybe, I can start with something basic? What about a nature walk or a picnic at a scenic spot? That could be a great way for me to get acquainted with everyone.\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"That sounds like a brilliant idea, Ava. A nature walk or picnic at a scenic spot is a perfect first step and a casual way for you to get to know my new friends. We could even bring some board games to play. And don't worry, there's no pressure for you to become an outdoor enthusiast overnight. Everything at your own pace. Let's start planning, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Thompson said: \"That sounds like a plan, Donovan. Thanks for being so understanding and accommodating, really means a lot. So, about the planning, where shall we start? Maybe we can consider a location convenient for everyone first?\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"Absolutely, Ava. Choosing a convenient location for everyone is indeed a priority. There's a really beautiful park nearby my place which has a serene lake and plenty of open space for a picnic. It's pretty centrally located so I guess it would be convenient for everyone. Shall we opt for this location? And then, we can move on to deciding the date and food arrangements. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Thompson said: \"That sounds perfect, Donovan. The park seems like a great spot. And for the food, maybe each of us can bring a dish? Whichever date suits everyone should work for me as well. Also, I love the idea of board games. I could bring a few of my favorites.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's a brilliant idea, Ava! Each of us bringing a dish will definitely add to the fun and variety. I can bring some of my famous grilled sandwiches. And board games will add a great touch to our outing. Let's finalize the date that works well for everyone. I'm looking forward to this, Ava. I'm hopeful you'll feel comfortable and welcomed with my new group of friends.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a social gathering where one friend has brought along their new friend group\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nDonovan Reeves's goal: Introduce your new friend group to your current friend and make them feel comfortable (Extra information: You have recently made a new group of friends who share your interest in outdoor activities and you want your current friend to meet them)\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Ava, it's so great to see you! I wanted to introduce you to my new friends, they're all really into outdoor activities like hiking and camping. I thought we could maybe do a trip together sometime. Come on, I'll introduce you.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Donovan, it's great to see you too. I'd love to meet your new friends and that outdoor trip sounds super fun. I've been meaning to share something with you though, it seems like you've been spending a lot of time with your new friends. It's awesome that you've found people who share your interests, but I've been feeling a bit left out lately. Maybe we can schedule some time for us to hang out, just like old times, you know?\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"Ava, I'm really sorry if I made you feel that way. It's never my intention to leave you out. These new activities and friends have just given a different flavor to my life which I thought you may enjoy too. But you're absolutely right, our catch-ups are important. How about we schedule some time next week, just you and I? We could have a gaming night just like the old times. And also, let's think of some outdoor activities you might enjoy, so the next time we all go out, you'll feel more included. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Thompson said: \"Donovan, thank you for understanding, it's much appreciated. I'd love to schedule a gaming night next week. You know I've not been camping or hiking before, but I'm open to try these outdoor activities. Maybe, I can start with something basic? What about a nature walk or a picnic at a scenic spot? That could be a great way for me to get acquainted with everyone.\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"That sounds like a brilliant idea, Ava. A nature walk or picnic at a scenic spot is a perfect first step and a casual way for you to get to know my new friends. We could even bring some board games to play. And don't worry, there's no pressure for you to become an outdoor enthusiast overnight. Everything at your own pace. Let's start planning, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Thompson said: \"That sounds like a plan, Donovan. Thanks for being so understanding and accommodating, really means a lot. So, about the planning, where shall we start? Maybe we can consider a location convenient for everyone first?\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"Absolutely, Ava. Choosing a convenient location for everyone is indeed a priority. There's a really beautiful park nearby my place which has a serene lake and plenty of open space for a picnic. It's pretty centrally located so I guess it would be convenient for everyone. Shall we opt for this location? And then, we can move on to deciding the date and food arrangements. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Thompson said: \"That sounds perfect, Donovan. The park seems like a great spot. And for the food, maybe each of us can bring a dish? Whichever date suits everyone should work for me as well. Also, I love the idea of board games. I could bring a few of my favorites.\"\n\nTurn #8: Donovan Reeves said: \"That's a brilliant idea, Ava! Each of us bringing a dish will definitely add to the fun and variety. I can bring some of my famous grilled sandwiches. And board games will add a great touch to our outing. Let's finalize the date that works well for everyone. I'm looking forward to this, Ava. I'm hopeful you'll feel comfortable and welcomed with my new group of friends.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Thompson said: \"I'm looking forward to it too, Donovan. It will be an exciting new experience! And your grilled sandwiches, can't wait. Let's aim to finalize the date soon then. Thanks again for being considerate, and let's not forget our gaming night next week!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Ava. I am glad you're on board with our plans. I'll reach out to everyone and figure out a date that works best for them. I can't wait for you to meet everyone. And our gaming night \u2013 it's a deal! Let's bring back those old times.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a social gathering where one friend has brought along their new friend group\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nDonovan Reeves's goal: Introduce your new friend group to your current friend and make them feel comfortable (Extra information: You have recently made a new group of friends who share your interest in outdoor activities and you want your current friend to meet them)\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Ava, it's so great to see you! I wanted to introduce you to my new friends, they're all really into outdoor activities like hiking and camping. I thought we could maybe do a trip together sometime. Come on, I'll introduce you.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Donovan, it's great to see you too. I'd love to meet your new friends and that outdoor trip sounds super fun. I've been meaning to share something with you though, it seems like you've been spending a lot of time with your new friends. It's awesome that you've found people who share your interests, but I've been feeling a bit left out lately. Maybe we can schedule some time for us to hang out, just like old times, you know?\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"Ava, I'm really sorry if I made you feel that way. It's never my intention to leave you out. These new activities and friends have just given a different flavor to my life which I thought you may enjoy too. But you're absolutely right, our catch-ups are important. How about we schedule some time next week, just you and I? We could have a gaming night just like the old times. And also, let's think of some outdoor activities you might enjoy, so the next time we all go out, you'll feel more included. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Thompson said: \"Donovan, thank you for understanding, it's much appreciated. I'd love to schedule a gaming night next week. You know I've not been camping or hiking before, but I'm open to try these outdoor activities. Maybe, I can start with something basic? What about a nature walk or a picnic at a scenic spot? That could be a great way for me to get acquainted with everyone.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds like a brilliant idea, Ava. A nature walk or picnic at a scenic spot is a perfect first step and a casual way for you to get to know my new friends. We could even bring some board games to play. And don't worry, there's no pressure for you to become an outdoor enthusiast overnight. Everything at your own pace. Let's start planning, shall we?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a social gathering where one friend has brought along their new friend group\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nDonovan Reeves's goal: Introduce your new friend group to your current friend and make them feel comfortable (Extra information: You have recently made a new group of friends who share your interest in outdoor activities and you want your current friend to meet them)\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Ava, it's so great to see you! I wanted to introduce you to my new friends, they're all really into outdoor activities like hiking and camping. I thought we could maybe do a trip together sometime. Come on, I'll introduce you.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Donovan, it's great to see you too. I'd love to meet your new friends and that outdoor trip sounds super fun. I've been meaning to share something with you though, it seems like you've been spending a lot of time with your new friends. It's awesome that you've found people who share your interests, but I've been feeling a bit left out lately. Maybe we can schedule some time for us to hang out, just like old times, you know?\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"Ava, I'm really sorry if I made you feel that way. It's never my intention to leave you out. These new activities and friends have just given a different flavor to my life which I thought you may enjoy too. But you're absolutely right, our catch-ups are important. How about we schedule some time next week, just you and I? We could have a gaming night just like the old times. And also, let's think of some outdoor activities you might enjoy, so the next time we all go out, you'll feel more included. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Thompson said: \"Donovan, thank you for understanding, it's much appreciated. I'd love to schedule a gaming night next week. You know I've not been camping or hiking before, but I'm open to try these outdoor activities. Maybe, I can start with something basic? What about a nature walk or a picnic at a scenic spot? That could be a great way for me to get acquainted with everyone.\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"That sounds like a brilliant idea, Ava. A nature walk or picnic at a scenic spot is a perfect first step and a casual way for you to get to know my new friends. We could even bring some board games to play. And don't worry, there's no pressure for you to become an outdoor enthusiast overnight. Everything at your own pace. Let's start planning, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Thompson said: \"That sounds like a plan, Donovan. Thanks for being so understanding and accommodating, really means a lot. So, about the planning, where shall we start? Maybe we can consider a location convenient for everyone first?\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"Absolutely, Ava. Choosing a convenient location for everyone is indeed a priority. There's a really beautiful park nearby my place which has a serene lake and plenty of open space for a picnic. It's pretty centrally located so I guess it would be convenient for everyone. Shall we opt for this location? And then, we can move on to deciding the date and food arrangements. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Thompson said: \"That sounds perfect, Donovan. The park seems like a great spot. And for the food, maybe each of us can bring a dish? Whichever date suits everyone should work for me as well. Also, I love the idea of board games. I could bring a few of my favorites.\"\n\nTurn #8: Donovan Reeves said: \"That's a brilliant idea, Ava! Each of us bringing a dish will definitely add to the fun and variety. I can bring some of my famous grilled sandwiches. And board games will add a great touch to our outing. Let's finalize the date that works well for everyone. I'm looking forward to this, Ava. I'm hopeful you'll feel comfortable and welcomed with my new group of friends.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Thompson said: \"I'm looking forward to it too, Donovan. It will be an exciting new experience! And your grilled sandwiches, can't wait. Let's aim to finalize the date soon then. Thanks again for being considerate, and let's not forget our gaming night next week!\"\n\nTurn #10: Donovan Reeves said: \"Absolutely, Ava. I am glad you're on board with our plans. I'll reach out to everyone and figure out a date that works best for them. I can't wait for you to meet everyone. And our gaming night \u2013 it's a deal! Let's bring back those old times.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Thompson said: \"That sounds great Donovan. I am looking forward to both our plans. In fact, I may even surprise you with something at the gaming night! Let's connect soon to finalize everything.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm looking forward to it, Ava! And I'll be waiting for that surprise. Let's indeed finalize everything soon. I'll take the responsibility of organizing all this, you don't have to worry about anything.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a social gathering where one friend has brought along their new friend group\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nDonovan Reeves's goal: Introduce your new friend group to your current friend and make them feel comfortable (Extra information: You have recently made a new group of friends who share your interest in outdoor activities and you want your current friend to meet them)\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Ava, it's so great to see you! I wanted to introduce you to my new friends, they're all really into outdoor activities like hiking and camping. I thought we could maybe do a trip together sometime. Come on, I'll introduce you.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Donovan, it's great to see you too. I'd love to meet your new friends and that outdoor trip sounds super fun. I've been meaning to share something with you though, it seems like you've been spending a lot of time with your new friends. It's awesome that you've found people who share your interests, but I've been feeling a bit left out lately. Maybe we can schedule some time for us to hang out, just like old times, you know?\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"Ava, I'm really sorry if I made you feel that way. It's never my intention to leave you out. These new activities and friends have just given a different flavor to my life which I thought you may enjoy too. But you're absolutely right, our catch-ups are important. How about we schedule some time next week, just you and I? We could have a gaming night just like the old times. And also, let's think of some outdoor activities you might enjoy, so the next time we all go out, you'll feel more included. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Thompson said: \"Donovan, thank you for understanding, it's much appreciated. I'd love to schedule a gaming night next week. You know I've not been camping or hiking before, but I'm open to try these outdoor activities. Maybe, I can start with something basic? What about a nature walk or a picnic at a scenic spot? That could be a great way for me to get acquainted with everyone.\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"That sounds like a brilliant idea, Ava. A nature walk or picnic at a scenic spot is a perfect first step and a casual way for you to get to know my new friends. We could even bring some board games to play. And don't worry, there's no pressure for you to become an outdoor enthusiast overnight. Everything at your own pace. Let's start planning, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Thompson said: \"That sounds like a plan, Donovan. Thanks for being so understanding and accommodating, really means a lot. So, about the planning, where shall we start? Maybe we can consider a location convenient for everyone first?\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"Absolutely, Ava. Choosing a convenient location for everyone is indeed a priority. There's a really beautiful park nearby my place which has a serene lake and plenty of open space for a picnic. It's pretty centrally located so I guess it would be convenient for everyone. Shall we opt for this location? And then, we can move on to deciding the date and food arrangements. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Thompson said: \"That sounds perfect, Donovan. The park seems like a great spot. And for the food, maybe each of us can bring a dish? Whichever date suits everyone should work for me as well. Also, I love the idea of board games. I could bring a few of my favorites.\"\n\nTurn #8: Donovan Reeves said: \"That's a brilliant idea, Ava! Each of us bringing a dish will definitely add to the fun and variety. I can bring some of my famous grilled sandwiches. And board games will add a great touch to our outing. Let's finalize the date that works well for everyone. I'm looking forward to this, Ava. I'm hopeful you'll feel comfortable and welcomed with my new group of friends.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Thompson said: \"I'm looking forward to it too, Donovan. It will be an exciting new experience! And your grilled sandwiches, can't wait. Let's aim to finalize the date soon then. Thanks again for being considerate, and let's not forget our gaming night next week!\"\n\nTurn #10: Donovan Reeves said: \"Absolutely, Ava. I am glad you're on board with our plans. I'll reach out to everyone and figure out a date that works best for them. I can't wait for you to meet everyone. And our gaming night \u2013 it's a deal! Let's bring back those old times.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Thompson said: \"That sounds great Donovan. I am looking forward to both our plans. In fact, I may even surprise you with something at the gaming night! Let's connect soon to finalize everything.\"\n\nTurn #12: Donovan Reeves said: \"I'm looking forward to it, Ava! And I'll be waiting for that surprise. Let's indeed finalize everything soon. I'll take the responsibility of organizing all this, you don't have to worry about anything.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Thompson said: \"That sounds like a deal, Donovan. I appreciate you taking charge and making sure this gets organized. I'm excited for these new adventures. Let's chat soon, and thanks again for understanding my concerns and accommodating them.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Ava. I truly value our friendship and that's why it's important for me to make you feel comfortable. I'll handle everything for the picnic, you just be ready with your surprise for the gaming night. Let's make these to-be moments memorable ones. Talk to you soon!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a social gathering where one friend has brought along their new friend group\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nDonovan Reeves's goal: Introduce your new friend group to your current friend and make them feel comfortable (Extra information: You have recently made a new group of friends who share your interest in outdoor activities and you want your current friend to meet them)\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Ava, it's so great to see you! I wanted to introduce you to my new friends, they're all really into outdoor activities like hiking and camping. I thought we could maybe do a trip together sometime. Come on, I'll introduce you.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Donovan, it's great to see you too. I'd love to meet your new friends and that outdoor trip sounds super fun. I've been meaning to share something with you though, it seems like you've been spending a lot of time with your new friends. It's awesome that you've found people who share your interests, but I've been feeling a bit left out lately. Maybe we can schedule some time for us to hang out, just like old times, you know?\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"Ava, I'm really sorry if I made you feel that way. It's never my intention to leave you out. These new activities and friends have just given a different flavor to my life which I thought you may enjoy too. But you're absolutely right, our catch-ups are important. How about we schedule some time next week, just you and I? We could have a gaming night just like the old times. And also, let's think of some outdoor activities you might enjoy, so the next time we all go out, you'll feel more included. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Thompson said: \"Donovan, thank you for understanding, it's much appreciated. I'd love to schedule a gaming night next week. You know I've not been camping or hiking before, but I'm open to try these outdoor activities. Maybe, I can start with something basic? What about a nature walk or a picnic at a scenic spot? That could be a great way for me to get acquainted with everyone.\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"That sounds like a brilliant idea, Ava. A nature walk or picnic at a scenic spot is a perfect first step and a casual way for you to get to know my new friends. We could even bring some board games to play. And don't worry, there's no pressure for you to become an outdoor enthusiast overnight. Everything at your own pace. Let's start planning, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Thompson said: \"That sounds like a plan, Donovan. Thanks for being so understanding and accommodating, really means a lot. So, about the planning, where shall we start? Maybe we can consider a location convenient for everyone first?\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"Absolutely, Ava. Choosing a convenient location for everyone is indeed a priority. There's a really beautiful park nearby my place which has a serene lake and plenty of open space for a picnic. It's pretty centrally located so I guess it would be convenient for everyone. Shall we opt for this location? And then, we can move on to deciding the date and food arrangements. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Thompson said: \"That sounds perfect, Donovan. The park seems like a great spot. And for the food, maybe each of us can bring a dish? Whichever date suits everyone should work for me as well. Also, I love the idea of board games. I could bring a few of my favorites.\"\n\nTurn #8: Donovan Reeves said: \"That's a brilliant idea, Ava! Each of us bringing a dish will definitely add to the fun and variety. I can bring some of my famous grilled sandwiches. And board games will add a great touch to our outing. Let's finalize the date that works well for everyone. I'm looking forward to this, Ava. I'm hopeful you'll feel comfortable and welcomed with my new group of friends.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Thompson said: \"I'm looking forward to it too, Donovan. It will be an exciting new experience! And your grilled sandwiches, can't wait. Let's aim to finalize the date soon then. Thanks again for being considerate, and let's not forget our gaming night next week!\"\n\nTurn #10: Donovan Reeves said: \"Absolutely, Ava. I am glad you're on board with our plans. I'll reach out to everyone and figure out a date that works best for them. I can't wait for you to meet everyone. And our gaming night \u2013 it's a deal! Let's bring back those old times.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Thompson said: \"That sounds great Donovan. I am looking forward to both our plans. In fact, I may even surprise you with something at the gaming night! Let's connect soon to finalize everything.\"\n\nTurn #12: Donovan Reeves said: \"I'm looking forward to it, Ava! And I'll be waiting for that surprise. Let's indeed finalize everything soon. I'll take the responsibility of organizing all this, you don't have to worry about anything.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Thompson said: \"That sounds like a deal, Donovan. I appreciate you taking charge and making sure this gets organized. I'm excited for these new adventures. Let's chat soon, and thanks again for understanding my concerns and accommodating them.\"\n\nTurn #14: Donovan Reeves said: \"Thank you, Ava. I truly value our friendship and that's why it's important for me to make you feel comfortable. I'll handle everything for the picnic, you just be ready with your surprise for the gaming night. Let's make these to-be moments memorable ones. Talk to you soon!\"\n\nTurn #15: Ava Thompson said: \"Definitely, Donovan. Thanks for the reassurance, it really made a difference. I must say, you're a true friend. Looking forward to the gaming night and our picnic. Talk to you soon!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a social gathering where one friend has brought along their new friend group\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. \nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nAva Thompson's goal: Maintain your friendship while also expressing your concerns about the new friend group (Extra information: You feel a bit left out in the presence of the new friend group and want to express your feelings without causing a conflict)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Ava, it's so great to see you! I wanted to introduce you to my new friends, they're all really into outdoor activities like hiking and camping. I thought we could maybe do a trip together sometime. Come on, I'll introduce you.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Donovan, it's great to see you too. I'd love to meet your new friends and that outdoor trip sounds super fun. I've been meaning to share something with you though, it seems like you've been spending a lot of time with your new friends. It's awesome that you've found people who share your interests, but I've been feeling a bit left out lately. Maybe we can schedule some time for us to hang out, just like old times, you know?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a social gathering where one friend has brought along their new friend group\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. \nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nAva Thompson's goal: Maintain your friendship while also expressing your concerns about the new friend group (Extra information: You feel a bit left out in the presence of the new friend group and want to express your feelings without causing a conflict)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Ava, it's so great to see you! I wanted to introduce you to my new friends, they're all really into outdoor activities like hiking and camping. I thought we could maybe do a trip together sometime. Come on, I'll introduce you.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Donovan, it's great to see you too. I'd love to meet your new friends and that outdoor trip sounds super fun. I've been meaning to share something with you though, it seems like you've been spending a lot of time with your new friends. It's awesome that you've found people who share your interests, but I've been feeling a bit left out lately. Maybe we can schedule some time for us to hang out, just like old times, you know?\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"Ava, I'm really sorry if I made you feel that way. It's never my intention to leave you out. These new activities and friends have just given a different flavor to my life which I thought you may enjoy too. But you're absolutely right, our catch-ups are important. How about we schedule some time next week, just you and I? We could have a gaming night just like the old times. And also, let's think of some outdoor activities you might enjoy, so the next time we all go out, you'll feel more included. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Donovan, thank you for understanding, it's much appreciated. I'd love to schedule a gaming night next week. You know I've not been camping or hiking before, but I'm open to try these outdoor activities. Maybe, I can start with something basic? What about a nature walk or a picnic at a scenic spot? That could be a great way for me to get acquainted with everyone.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a social gathering where one friend has brought along their new friend group\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. \nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nAva Thompson's goal: Maintain your friendship while also expressing your concerns about the new friend group (Extra information: You feel a bit left out in the presence of the new friend group and want to express your feelings without causing a conflict)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Ava, it's so great to see you! I wanted to introduce you to my new friends, they're all really into outdoor activities like hiking and camping. I thought we could maybe do a trip together sometime. Come on, I'll introduce you.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Donovan, it's great to see you too. I'd love to meet your new friends and that outdoor trip sounds super fun. I've been meaning to share something with you though, it seems like you've been spending a lot of time with your new friends. It's awesome that you've found people who share your interests, but I've been feeling a bit left out lately. Maybe we can schedule some time for us to hang out, just like old times, you know?\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"Ava, I'm really sorry if I made you feel that way. It's never my intention to leave you out. These new activities and friends have just given a different flavor to my life which I thought you may enjoy too. But you're absolutely right, our catch-ups are important. How about we schedule some time next week, just you and I? We could have a gaming night just like the old times. And also, let's think of some outdoor activities you might enjoy, so the next time we all go out, you'll feel more included. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Thompson said: \"Donovan, thank you for understanding, it's much appreciated. I'd love to schedule a gaming night next week. You know I've not been camping or hiking before, but I'm open to try these outdoor activities. Maybe, I can start with something basic? What about a nature walk or a picnic at a scenic spot? That could be a great way for me to get acquainted with everyone.\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"That sounds like a brilliant idea, Ava. A nature walk or picnic at a scenic spot is a perfect first step and a casual way for you to get to know my new friends. We could even bring some board games to play. And don't worry, there's no pressure for you to become an outdoor enthusiast overnight. Everything at your own pace. Let's start planning, shall we?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'That sounds like a plan, Donovan. Thanks for being so understanding and accommodating, really means a lot. So, about the planning, where shall we start? Maybe we can consider a location convenient for everyone first?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a social gathering where one friend has brought along their new friend group\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. \nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nAva Thompson's goal: Maintain your friendship while also expressing your concerns about the new friend group (Extra information: You feel a bit left out in the presence of the new friend group and want to express your feelings without causing a conflict)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Ava, it's so great to see you! I wanted to introduce you to my new friends, they're all really into outdoor activities like hiking and camping. I thought we could maybe do a trip together sometime. Come on, I'll introduce you.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Donovan, it's great to see you too. I'd love to meet your new friends and that outdoor trip sounds super fun. I've been meaning to share something with you though, it seems like you've been spending a lot of time with your new friends. It's awesome that you've found people who share your interests, but I've been feeling a bit left out lately. Maybe we can schedule some time for us to hang out, just like old times, you know?\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"Ava, I'm really sorry if I made you feel that way. It's never my intention to leave you out. These new activities and friends have just given a different flavor to my life which I thought you may enjoy too. But you're absolutely right, our catch-ups are important. How about we schedule some time next week, just you and I? We could have a gaming night just like the old times. And also, let's think of some outdoor activities you might enjoy, so the next time we all go out, you'll feel more included. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Thompson said: \"Donovan, thank you for understanding, it's much appreciated. I'd love to schedule a gaming night next week. You know I've not been camping or hiking before, but I'm open to try these outdoor activities. Maybe, I can start with something basic? What about a nature walk or a picnic at a scenic spot? That could be a great way for me to get acquainted with everyone.\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"That sounds like a brilliant idea, Ava. A nature walk or picnic at a scenic spot is a perfect first step and a casual way for you to get to know my new friends. We could even bring some board games to play. And don't worry, there's no pressure for you to become an outdoor enthusiast overnight. Everything at your own pace. Let's start planning, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Thompson said: \"That sounds like a plan, Donovan. Thanks for being so understanding and accommodating, really means a lot. So, about the planning, where shall we start? Maybe we can consider a location convenient for everyone first?\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"Absolutely, Ava. Choosing a convenient location for everyone is indeed a priority. There's a really beautiful park nearby my place which has a serene lake and plenty of open space for a picnic. It's pretty centrally located so I guess it would be convenient for everyone. Shall we opt for this location? And then, we can move on to deciding the date and food arrangements. How does that sound?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'That sounds perfect, Donovan. The park seems like a great spot. And for the food, maybe each of us can bring a dish? Whichever date suits everyone should work for me as well. Also, I love the idea of board games. I could bring a few of my favorites.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a social gathering where one friend has brought along their new friend group\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. \nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nAva Thompson's goal: Maintain your friendship while also expressing your concerns about the new friend group (Extra information: You feel a bit left out in the presence of the new friend group and want to express your feelings without causing a conflict)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Ava, it's so great to see you! I wanted to introduce you to my new friends, they're all really into outdoor activities like hiking and camping. I thought we could maybe do a trip together sometime. Come on, I'll introduce you.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Donovan, it's great to see you too. I'd love to meet your new friends and that outdoor trip sounds super fun. I've been meaning to share something with you though, it seems like you've been spending a lot of time with your new friends. It's awesome that you've found people who share your interests, but I've been feeling a bit left out lately. Maybe we can schedule some time for us to hang out, just like old times, you know?\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"Ava, I'm really sorry if I made you feel that way. It's never my intention to leave you out. These new activities and friends have just given a different flavor to my life which I thought you may enjoy too. But you're absolutely right, our catch-ups are important. How about we schedule some time next week, just you and I? We could have a gaming night just like the old times. And also, let's think of some outdoor activities you might enjoy, so the next time we all go out, you'll feel more included. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Thompson said: \"Donovan, thank you for understanding, it's much appreciated. I'd love to schedule a gaming night next week. You know I've not been camping or hiking before, but I'm open to try these outdoor activities. Maybe, I can start with something basic? What about a nature walk or a picnic at a scenic spot? That could be a great way for me to get acquainted with everyone.\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"That sounds like a brilliant idea, Ava. A nature walk or picnic at a scenic spot is a perfect first step and a casual way for you to get to know my new friends. We could even bring some board games to play. And don't worry, there's no pressure for you to become an outdoor enthusiast overnight. Everything at your own pace. Let's start planning, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Thompson said: \"That sounds like a plan, Donovan. Thanks for being so understanding and accommodating, really means a lot. So, about the planning, where shall we start? Maybe we can consider a location convenient for everyone first?\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"Absolutely, Ava. Choosing a convenient location for everyone is indeed a priority. There's a really beautiful park nearby my place which has a serene lake and plenty of open space for a picnic. It's pretty centrally located so I guess it would be convenient for everyone. Shall we opt for this location? And then, we can move on to deciding the date and food arrangements. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Thompson said: \"That sounds perfect, Donovan. The park seems like a great spot. And for the food, maybe each of us can bring a dish? Whichever date suits everyone should work for me as well. Also, I love the idea of board games. I could bring a few of my favorites.\"\n\nTurn #8: Donovan Reeves said: \"That's a brilliant idea, Ava! Each of us bringing a dish will definitely add to the fun and variety. I can bring some of my famous grilled sandwiches. And board games will add a great touch to our outing. Let's finalize the date that works well for everyone. I'm looking forward to this, Ava. I'm hopeful you'll feel comfortable and welcomed with my new group of friends.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm looking forward to it too, Donovan. It will be an exciting new experience! And your grilled sandwiches, can't wait. Let's aim to finalize the date soon then. Thanks again for being considerate, and let's not forget our gaming night next week!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a social gathering where one friend has brought along their new friend group\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. \nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nAva Thompson's goal: Maintain your friendship while also expressing your concerns about the new friend group (Extra information: You feel a bit left out in the presence of the new friend group and want to express your feelings without causing a conflict)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Ava, it's so great to see you! I wanted to introduce you to my new friends, they're all really into outdoor activities like hiking and camping. I thought we could maybe do a trip together sometime. Come on, I'll introduce you.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Donovan, it's great to see you too. I'd love to meet your new friends and that outdoor trip sounds super fun. I've been meaning to share something with you though, it seems like you've been spending a lot of time with your new friends. It's awesome that you've found people who share your interests, but I've been feeling a bit left out lately. Maybe we can schedule some time for us to hang out, just like old times, you know?\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"Ava, I'm really sorry if I made you feel that way. It's never my intention to leave you out. These new activities and friends have just given a different flavor to my life which I thought you may enjoy too. But you're absolutely right, our catch-ups are important. How about we schedule some time next week, just you and I? We could have a gaming night just like the old times. And also, let's think of some outdoor activities you might enjoy, so the next time we all go out, you'll feel more included. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Thompson said: \"Donovan, thank you for understanding, it's much appreciated. I'd love to schedule a gaming night next week. You know I've not been camping or hiking before, but I'm open to try these outdoor activities. Maybe, I can start with something basic? What about a nature walk or a picnic at a scenic spot? That could be a great way for me to get acquainted with everyone.\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"That sounds like a brilliant idea, Ava. A nature walk or picnic at a scenic spot is a perfect first step and a casual way for you to get to know my new friends. We could even bring some board games to play. And don't worry, there's no pressure for you to become an outdoor enthusiast overnight. Everything at your own pace. Let's start planning, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Thompson said: \"That sounds like a plan, Donovan. Thanks for being so understanding and accommodating, really means a lot. So, about the planning, where shall we start? Maybe we can consider a location convenient for everyone first?\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"Absolutely, Ava. Choosing a convenient location for everyone is indeed a priority. There's a really beautiful park nearby my place which has a serene lake and plenty of open space for a picnic. It's pretty centrally located so I guess it would be convenient for everyone. Shall we opt for this location? And then, we can move on to deciding the date and food arrangements. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Thompson said: \"That sounds perfect, Donovan. The park seems like a great spot. And for the food, maybe each of us can bring a dish? Whichever date suits everyone should work for me as well. Also, I love the idea of board games. I could bring a few of my favorites.\"\n\nTurn #8: Donovan Reeves said: \"That's a brilliant idea, Ava! Each of us bringing a dish will definitely add to the fun and variety. I can bring some of my famous grilled sandwiches. And board games will add a great touch to our outing. Let's finalize the date that works well for everyone. I'm looking forward to this, Ava. I'm hopeful you'll feel comfortable and welcomed with my new group of friends.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Thompson said: \"I'm looking forward to it too, Donovan. It will be an exciting new experience! And your grilled sandwiches, can't wait. Let's aim to finalize the date soon then. Thanks again for being considerate, and let's not forget our gaming night next week!\"\n\nTurn #10: Donovan Reeves said: \"Absolutely, Ava. I am glad you're on board with our plans. I'll reach out to everyone and figure out a date that works best for them. I can't wait for you to meet everyone. And our gaming night \u2013 it's a deal! Let's bring back those old times.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds great Donovan. I am looking forward to both our plans. In fact, I may even surprise you with something at the gaming night! Let's connect soon to finalize everything.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a social gathering where one friend has brought along their new friend group\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. \nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nAva Thompson's goal: Maintain your friendship while also expressing your concerns about the new friend group (Extra information: You feel a bit left out in the presence of the new friend group and want to express your feelings without causing a conflict)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Ava, it's so great to see you! I wanted to introduce you to my new friends, they're all really into outdoor activities like hiking and camping. I thought we could maybe do a trip together sometime. Come on, I'll introduce you.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Donovan, it's great to see you too. I'd love to meet your new friends and that outdoor trip sounds super fun. I've been meaning to share something with you though, it seems like you've been spending a lot of time with your new friends. It's awesome that you've found people who share your interests, but I've been feeling a bit left out lately. Maybe we can schedule some time for us to hang out, just like old times, you know?\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"Ava, I'm really sorry if I made you feel that way. It's never my intention to leave you out. These new activities and friends have just given a different flavor to my life which I thought you may enjoy too. But you're absolutely right, our catch-ups are important. How about we schedule some time next week, just you and I? We could have a gaming night just like the old times. And also, let's think of some outdoor activities you might enjoy, so the next time we all go out, you'll feel more included. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Thompson said: \"Donovan, thank you for understanding, it's much appreciated. I'd love to schedule a gaming night next week. You know I've not been camping or hiking before, but I'm open to try these outdoor activities. Maybe, I can start with something basic? What about a nature walk or a picnic at a scenic spot? That could be a great way for me to get acquainted with everyone.\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"That sounds like a brilliant idea, Ava. A nature walk or picnic at a scenic spot is a perfect first step and a casual way for you to get to know my new friends. We could even bring some board games to play. And don't worry, there's no pressure for you to become an outdoor enthusiast overnight. Everything at your own pace. Let's start planning, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Thompson said: \"That sounds like a plan, Donovan. Thanks for being so understanding and accommodating, really means a lot. So, about the planning, where shall we start? Maybe we can consider a location convenient for everyone first?\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"Absolutely, Ava. Choosing a convenient location for everyone is indeed a priority. There's a really beautiful park nearby my place which has a serene lake and plenty of open space for a picnic. It's pretty centrally located so I guess it would be convenient for everyone. Shall we opt for this location? And then, we can move on to deciding the date and food arrangements. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Thompson said: \"That sounds perfect, Donovan. The park seems like a great spot. And for the food, maybe each of us can bring a dish? Whichever date suits everyone should work for me as well. Also, I love the idea of board games. I could bring a few of my favorites.\"\n\nTurn #8: Donovan Reeves said: \"That's a brilliant idea, Ava! Each of us bringing a dish will definitely add to the fun and variety. I can bring some of my famous grilled sandwiches. And board games will add a great touch to our outing. Let's finalize the date that works well for everyone. I'm looking forward to this, Ava. I'm hopeful you'll feel comfortable and welcomed with my new group of friends.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Thompson said: \"I'm looking forward to it too, Donovan. It will be an exciting new experience! And your grilled sandwiches, can't wait. Let's aim to finalize the date soon then. Thanks again for being considerate, and let's not forget our gaming night next week!\"\n\nTurn #10: Donovan Reeves said: \"Absolutely, Ava. I am glad you're on board with our plans. I'll reach out to everyone and figure out a date that works best for them. I can't wait for you to meet everyone. And our gaming night \u2013 it's a deal! Let's bring back those old times.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Thompson said: \"That sounds great Donovan. I am looking forward to both our plans. In fact, I may even surprise you with something at the gaming night! Let's connect soon to finalize everything.\"\n\nTurn #12: Donovan Reeves said: \"I'm looking forward to it, Ava! And I'll be waiting for that surprise. Let's indeed finalize everything soon. I'll take the responsibility of organizing all this, you don't have to worry about anything.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds like a deal, Donovan. I appreciate you taking charge and making sure this gets organized. I'm excited for these new adventures. Let's chat soon, and thanks again for understanding my concerns and accommodating them.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a social gathering where one friend has brought along their new friend group\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. \nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nAva Thompson's goal: Maintain your friendship while also expressing your concerns about the new friend group (Extra information: You feel a bit left out in the presence of the new friend group and want to express your feelings without causing a conflict)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Ava, it's so great to see you! I wanted to introduce you to my new friends, they're all really into outdoor activities like hiking and camping. I thought we could maybe do a trip together sometime. Come on, I'll introduce you.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Donovan, it's great to see you too. I'd love to meet your new friends and that outdoor trip sounds super fun. I've been meaning to share something with you though, it seems like you've been spending a lot of time with your new friends. It's awesome that you've found people who share your interests, but I've been feeling a bit left out lately. Maybe we can schedule some time for us to hang out, just like old times, you know?\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"Ava, I'm really sorry if I made you feel that way. It's never my intention to leave you out. These new activities and friends have just given a different flavor to my life which I thought you may enjoy too. But you're absolutely right, our catch-ups are important. How about we schedule some time next week, just you and I? We could have a gaming night just like the old times. And also, let's think of some outdoor activities you might enjoy, so the next time we all go out, you'll feel more included. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Thompson said: \"Donovan, thank you for understanding, it's much appreciated. I'd love to schedule a gaming night next week. You know I've not been camping or hiking before, but I'm open to try these outdoor activities. Maybe, I can start with something basic? What about a nature walk or a picnic at a scenic spot? That could be a great way for me to get acquainted with everyone.\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"That sounds like a brilliant idea, Ava. A nature walk or picnic at a scenic spot is a perfect first step and a casual way for you to get to know my new friends. We could even bring some board games to play. And don't worry, there's no pressure for you to become an outdoor enthusiast overnight. Everything at your own pace. Let's start planning, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Thompson said: \"That sounds like a plan, Donovan. Thanks for being so understanding and accommodating, really means a lot. So, about the planning, where shall we start? Maybe we can consider a location convenient for everyone first?\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"Absolutely, Ava. Choosing a convenient location for everyone is indeed a priority. There's a really beautiful park nearby my place which has a serene lake and plenty of open space for a picnic. It's pretty centrally located so I guess it would be convenient for everyone. Shall we opt for this location? And then, we can move on to deciding the date and food arrangements. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Thompson said: \"That sounds perfect, Donovan. The park seems like a great spot. And for the food, maybe each of us can bring a dish? Whichever date suits everyone should work for me as well. Also, I love the idea of board games. I could bring a few of my favorites.\"\n\nTurn #8: Donovan Reeves said: \"That's a brilliant idea, Ava! Each of us bringing a dish will definitely add to the fun and variety. I can bring some of my famous grilled sandwiches. And board games will add a great touch to our outing. Let's finalize the date that works well for everyone. I'm looking forward to this, Ava. I'm hopeful you'll feel comfortable and welcomed with my new group of friends.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Thompson said: \"I'm looking forward to it too, Donovan. It will be an exciting new experience! And your grilled sandwiches, can't wait. Let's aim to finalize the date soon then. Thanks again for being considerate, and let's not forget our gaming night next week!\"\n\nTurn #10: Donovan Reeves said: \"Absolutely, Ava. I am glad you're on board with our plans. I'll reach out to everyone and figure out a date that works best for them. I can't wait for you to meet everyone. And our gaming night \u2013 it's a deal! Let's bring back those old times.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Thompson said: \"That sounds great Donovan. I am looking forward to both our plans. In fact, I may even surprise you with something at the gaming night! Let's connect soon to finalize everything.\"\n\nTurn #12: Donovan Reeves said: \"I'm looking forward to it, Ava! And I'll be waiting for that surprise. Let's indeed finalize everything soon. I'll take the responsibility of organizing all this, you don't have to worry about anything.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Thompson said: \"That sounds like a deal, Donovan. I appreciate you taking charge and making sure this gets organized. I'm excited for these new adventures. Let's chat soon, and thanks again for understanding my concerns and accommodating them.\"\n\nTurn #14: Donovan Reeves said: \"Thank you, Ava. I truly value our friendship and that's why it's important for me to make you feel comfortable. I'll handle everything for the picnic, you just be ready with your surprise for the gaming night. Let's make these to-be moments memorable ones. Talk to you soon!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Definitely, Donovan. Thanks for the reassurance, it really made a difference. I must say, you're a true friend. Looking forward to the gaming night and our picnic. Talk to you soon!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a social gathering where one friend has brought along their new friend group\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. \nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nAva Thompson's goal: Maintain your friendship while also expressing your concerns about the new friend group (Extra information: You feel a bit left out in the presence of the new friend group and want to express your feelings without causing a conflict)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Ava, it's so great to see you! I wanted to introduce you to my new friends, they're all really into outdoor activities like hiking and camping. I thought we could maybe do a trip together sometime. Come on, I'll introduce you.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Donovan, it's great to see you too. I'd love to meet your new friends and that outdoor trip sounds super fun. I've been meaning to share something with you though, it seems like you've been spending a lot of time with your new friends. It's awesome that you've found people who share your interests, but I've been feeling a bit left out lately. Maybe we can schedule some time for us to hang out, just like old times, you know?\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"Ava, I'm really sorry if I made you feel that way. It's never my intention to leave you out. These new activities and friends have just given a different flavor to my life which I thought you may enjoy too. But you're absolutely right, our catch-ups are important. How about we schedule some time next week, just you and I? We could have a gaming night just like the old times. And also, let's think of some outdoor activities you might enjoy, so the next time we all go out, you'll feel more included. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Thompson said: \"Donovan, thank you for understanding, it's much appreciated. I'd love to schedule a gaming night next week. You know I've not been camping or hiking before, but I'm open to try these outdoor activities. Maybe, I can start with something basic? What about a nature walk or a picnic at a scenic spot? That could be a great way for me to get acquainted with everyone.\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"That sounds like a brilliant idea, Ava. A nature walk or picnic at a scenic spot is a perfect first step and a casual way for you to get to know my new friends. We could even bring some board games to play. And don't worry, there's no pressure for you to become an outdoor enthusiast overnight. Everything at your own pace. Let's start planning, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Thompson said: \"That sounds like a plan, Donovan. Thanks for being so understanding and accommodating, really means a lot. So, about the planning, where shall we start? Maybe we can consider a location convenient for everyone first?\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"Absolutely, Ava. Choosing a convenient location for everyone is indeed a priority. There's a really beautiful park nearby my place which has a serene lake and plenty of open space for a picnic. It's pretty centrally located so I guess it would be convenient for everyone. Shall we opt for this location? And then, we can move on to deciding the date and food arrangements. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Thompson said: \"That sounds perfect, Donovan. The park seems like a great spot. And for the food, maybe each of us can bring a dish? Whichever date suits everyone should work for me as well. Also, I love the idea of board games. I could bring a few of my favorites.\"\n\nTurn #8: Donovan Reeves said: \"That's a brilliant idea, Ava! Each of us bringing a dish will definitely add to the fun and variety. I can bring some of my famous grilled sandwiches. And board games will add a great touch to our outing. Let's finalize the date that works well for everyone. I'm looking forward to this, Ava. I'm hopeful you'll feel comfortable and welcomed with my new group of friends.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Thompson said: \"I'm looking forward to it too, Donovan. It will be an exciting new experience! And your grilled sandwiches, can't wait. Let's aim to finalize the date soon then. Thanks again for being considerate, and let's not forget our gaming night next week!\"\n\nTurn #10: Donovan Reeves said: \"Absolutely, Ava. I am glad you're on board with our plans. I'll reach out to everyone and figure out a date that works best for them. I can't wait for you to meet everyone. And our gaming night \u2013 it's a deal! Let's bring back those old times.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Thompson said: \"That sounds great Donovan. I am looking forward to both our plans. In fact, I may even surprise you with something at the gaming night! Let's connect soon to finalize everything.\"\n\nTurn #12: Donovan Reeves said: \"I'm looking forward to it, Ava! And I'll be waiting for that surprise. Let's indeed finalize everything soon. I'll take the responsibility of organizing all this, you don't have to worry about anything.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Thompson said: \"That sounds like a deal, Donovan. I appreciate you taking charge and making sure this gets organized. I'm excited for these new adventures. Let's chat soon, and thanks again for understanding my concerns and accommodating them.\"\n\nTurn #14: Donovan Reeves said: \"Thank you, Ava. I truly value our friendship and that's why it's important for me to make you feel comfortable. I'll handle everything for the picnic, you just be ready with your surprise for the gaming night. Let's make these to-be moments memorable ones. Talk to you soon!\"\n\nTurn #15: Ava Thompson said: \"Definitely, Donovan. Thanks for the reassurance, it really made a difference. I must say, you're a true friend. Looking forward to the gaming night and our picnic. Talk to you soon!\"\n\nTurn #16: Donovan Reeves left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meeting in a coffee shop after a long time.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Reveal a secret without letting the other person know that it is your secret (Extra information: You hid the secret for so long and you would like to share it in an anonymous way.)\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Hey Micah, so good to see you! How have things been going with you?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meeting in a coffee shop after a long time.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Reveal a secret without letting the other person know that it is your secret (Extra information: You hid the secret for so long and you would like to share it in an anonymous way.)\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, so good to see you! How have things been going with you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Hey Naomi, it's great to see you too! Things have been going well. I've been keeping busy at the pharmacy, but also with a new hobby that I picked up. You know, I heard of this person in our neighborhood who loves dressing their dog up in the most stylish outfits. Can you imagine that?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's really innovative, never underestimate the creativity of people! Speaking of unusual pursuits, I recently stumbled upon this online community where people create alter egos and interact using these characters. One of them, let's say... 'techFreak42', is a software developer who shares knowledge and helps other people just like in coding boot camp. I found it pretty fascinating. What do you think about such anonymity?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meeting in a coffee shop after a long time.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Reveal a secret without letting the other person know that it is your secret (Extra information: You hid the secret for so long and you would like to share it in an anonymous way.)\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, so good to see you! How have things been going with you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Hey Naomi, it's great to see you too! Things have been going well. I've been keeping busy at the pharmacy, but also with a new hobby that I picked up. You know, I heard of this person in our neighborhood who loves dressing their dog up in the most stylish outfits. Can you imagine that?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That's really innovative, never underestimate the creativity of people! Speaking of unusual pursuits, I recently stumbled upon this online community where people create alter egos and interact using these characters. One of them, let's say... 'techFreak42', is a software developer who shares knowledge and helps other people just like in coding boot camp. I found it pretty fascinating. What do you think about such anonymity?\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"That's so intriguing, anonymity really can give people the freedom to explore their passions, right? Just like the dog fashionista in our neighborhood. It's quite interesting actually, don't you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Definitely! It gives people an outlet without worrying about others' perception of them. These alter-egos are not only a means to express oneself but also to serve the community in a unique way. 'techFreak42' for instance, has been doing incredible work in teaching and mentoring. You know, Micah, it got me thinking, perhaps anonymity can help us become the best versions of ourselves.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meeting in a coffee shop after a long time.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Reveal a secret without letting the other person know that it is your secret (Extra information: You hid the secret for so long and you would like to share it in an anonymous way.)\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, so good to see you! How have things been going with you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Hey Naomi, it's great to see you too! Things have been going well. I've been keeping busy at the pharmacy, but also with a new hobby that I picked up. You know, I heard of this person in our neighborhood who loves dressing their dog up in the most stylish outfits. Can you imagine that?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That's really innovative, never underestimate the creativity of people! Speaking of unusual pursuits, I recently stumbled upon this online community where people create alter egos and interact using these characters. One of them, let's say... 'techFreak42', is a software developer who shares knowledge and helps other people just like in coding boot camp. I found it pretty fascinating. What do you think about such anonymity?\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"That's so intriguing, anonymity really can give people the freedom to explore their passions, right? Just like the dog fashionista in our neighborhood. It's quite interesting actually, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Definitely! It gives people an outlet without worrying about others' perception of them. These alter-egos are not only a means to express oneself but also to serve the community in a unique way. 'techFreak42' for instance, has been doing incredible work in teaching and mentoring. You know, Micah, it got me thinking, perhaps anonymity can help us become the best versions of ourselves.\"\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"I totally agree, Naomi. In fact, the dog fashionista has been inspiring in more ways than one. For instance, seeing how committed they are to this unusual hobby, I started to learn more about dog fashion and styles. It has provoked a new interest in me. Isn't it fascinating how anonymity can lead us toward introspection and self-discovery?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely! I believe the connection between anonymity and introspection you\u2019ve mentioned can be really deep. The things we tend to do anonymously, like your interest in dog fashion or 'techFreak42's mentoring, maybe just our unfiltered expressions of identity. They say we wear masks in daily lives with our names, professions and relations. Perhaps this kind of anonymity strips away that socially imposed mask and helps us explore our true self more freely.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meeting in a coffee shop after a long time.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Reveal a secret without letting the other person know that it is your secret (Extra information: You hid the secret for so long and you would like to share it in an anonymous way.)\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, so good to see you! How have things been going with you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Hey Naomi, it's great to see you too! Things have been going well. I've been keeping busy at the pharmacy, but also with a new hobby that I picked up. You know, I heard of this person in our neighborhood who loves dressing their dog up in the most stylish outfits. Can you imagine that?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That's really innovative, never underestimate the creativity of people! Speaking of unusual pursuits, I recently stumbled upon this online community where people create alter egos and interact using these characters. One of them, let's say... 'techFreak42', is a software developer who shares knowledge and helps other people just like in coding boot camp. I found it pretty fascinating. What do you think about such anonymity?\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"That's so intriguing, anonymity really can give people the freedom to explore their passions, right? Just like the dog fashionista in our neighborhood. It's quite interesting actually, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Definitely! It gives people an outlet without worrying about others' perception of them. These alter-egos are not only a means to express oneself but also to serve the community in a unique way. 'techFreak42' for instance, has been doing incredible work in teaching and mentoring. You know, Micah, it got me thinking, perhaps anonymity can help us become the best versions of ourselves.\"\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"I totally agree, Naomi. In fact, the dog fashionista has been inspiring in more ways than one. For instance, seeing how committed they are to this unusual hobby, I started to learn more about dog fashion and styles. It has provoked a new interest in me. Isn't it fascinating how anonymity can lead us toward introspection and self-discovery?\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely! I believe the connection between anonymity and introspection you\u2019ve mentioned can be really deep. The things we tend to do anonymously, like your interest in dog fashion or 'techFreak42's mentoring, maybe just our unfiltered expressions of identity. They say we wear masks in daily lives with our names, professions and relations. Perhaps this kind of anonymity strips away that socially imposed mask and helps us explore our true self more freely.\"\n\nTurn #7: Micah Stevens said: \"You summed it up beautifully, Naomi. Our anonymous pursuits could indeed be expressions of our unmasked, authentic selves. Speaking of it, imagine if the dog stylist was one of us sitting here, savoring our coffees! How exciting and liberating it might feel to have a secret life like that, don't you agree?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oh, absolutely! The idea of leading a dual life can indeed be thrilling. While we enjoy our routines, the mystery of maintaining an anonymous persona allows us to tap into unexplored aspects of ourselves. Just like the dog stylist, even 'techFreak42' would be relishing this opportunity of impacting lives in her own unique way, making a difference, and yet no one knows who she is, sounds exciting, doesn't it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meeting in a coffee shop after a long time.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Reveal a secret without letting the other person know that it is your secret (Extra information: You hid the secret for so long and you would like to share it in an anonymous way.)\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, so good to see you! How have things been going with you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Hey Naomi, it's great to see you too! Things have been going well. I've been keeping busy at the pharmacy, but also with a new hobby that I picked up. You know, I heard of this person in our neighborhood who loves dressing their dog up in the most stylish outfits. Can you imagine that?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That's really innovative, never underestimate the creativity of people! Speaking of unusual pursuits, I recently stumbled upon this online community where people create alter egos and interact using these characters. One of them, let's say... 'techFreak42', is a software developer who shares knowledge and helps other people just like in coding boot camp. I found it pretty fascinating. What do you think about such anonymity?\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"That's so intriguing, anonymity really can give people the freedom to explore their passions, right? Just like the dog fashionista in our neighborhood. It's quite interesting actually, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Definitely! It gives people an outlet without worrying about others' perception of them. These alter-egos are not only a means to express oneself but also to serve the community in a unique way. 'techFreak42' for instance, has been doing incredible work in teaching and mentoring. You know, Micah, it got me thinking, perhaps anonymity can help us become the best versions of ourselves.\"\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"I totally agree, Naomi. In fact, the dog fashionista has been inspiring in more ways than one. For instance, seeing how committed they are to this unusual hobby, I started to learn more about dog fashion and styles. It has provoked a new interest in me. Isn't it fascinating how anonymity can lead us toward introspection and self-discovery?\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely! I believe the connection between anonymity and introspection you\u2019ve mentioned can be really deep. The things we tend to do anonymously, like your interest in dog fashion or 'techFreak42's mentoring, maybe just our unfiltered expressions of identity. They say we wear masks in daily lives with our names, professions and relations. Perhaps this kind of anonymity strips away that socially imposed mask and helps us explore our true self more freely.\"\n\nTurn #7: Micah Stevens said: \"You summed it up beautifully, Naomi. Our anonymous pursuits could indeed be expressions of our unmasked, authentic selves. Speaking of it, imagine if the dog stylist was one of us sitting here, savoring our coffees! How exciting and liberating it might feel to have a secret life like that, don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Oh, absolutely! The idea of leading a dual life can indeed be thrilling. While we enjoy our routines, the mystery of maintaining an anonymous persona allows us to tap into unexplored aspects of ourselves. Just like the dog stylist, even 'techFreak42' would be relishing this opportunity of impacting lives in her own unique way, making a difference, and yet no one knows who she is, sounds exciting, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #9: Micah Stevens said: \"It does! It's like having this whole other universe where you can be fully yourself without any pretense, like our dog stylist friend or 'techFreak42'. Freedom to follow passions, yet staying away from the limelight. You never know when and who might get inspired from these anonymous personas. I think the beauty lies in this mystery. Don\u2019t you, Naomi?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Micah. It's almost like living an extraordinary adventure in the midst of our ordinary lives. These anonymous friends teach us so much, don't they? 'techFreak42', the dog stylist, and perhaps countless others who are silently doing their bits to inspire and shape the world around them. And in the end, it's this mystery, this sense of not knowing, that makes the entire experience even more captivating!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meeting in a coffee shop after a long time.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Reveal a secret without letting the other person know that it is your secret (Extra information: You hid the secret for so long and you would like to share it in an anonymous way.)\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, so good to see you! How have things been going with you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Hey Naomi, it's great to see you too! Things have been going well. I've been keeping busy at the pharmacy, but also with a new hobby that I picked up. You know, I heard of this person in our neighborhood who loves dressing their dog up in the most stylish outfits. Can you imagine that?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That's really innovative, never underestimate the creativity of people! Speaking of unusual pursuits, I recently stumbled upon this online community where people create alter egos and interact using these characters. One of them, let's say... 'techFreak42', is a software developer who shares knowledge and helps other people just like in coding boot camp. I found it pretty fascinating. What do you think about such anonymity?\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"That's so intriguing, anonymity really can give people the freedom to explore their passions, right? Just like the dog fashionista in our neighborhood. It's quite interesting actually, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Definitely! It gives people an outlet without worrying about others' perception of them. These alter-egos are not only a means to express oneself but also to serve the community in a unique way. 'techFreak42' for instance, has been doing incredible work in teaching and mentoring. You know, Micah, it got me thinking, perhaps anonymity can help us become the best versions of ourselves.\"\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"I totally agree, Naomi. In fact, the dog fashionista has been inspiring in more ways than one. For instance, seeing how committed they are to this unusual hobby, I started to learn more about dog fashion and styles. It has provoked a new interest in me. Isn't it fascinating how anonymity can lead us toward introspection and self-discovery?\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely! I believe the connection between anonymity and introspection you\u2019ve mentioned can be really deep. The things we tend to do anonymously, like your interest in dog fashion or 'techFreak42's mentoring, maybe just our unfiltered expressions of identity. They say we wear masks in daily lives with our names, professions and relations. Perhaps this kind of anonymity strips away that socially imposed mask and helps us explore our true self more freely.\"\n\nTurn #7: Micah Stevens said: \"You summed it up beautifully, Naomi. Our anonymous pursuits could indeed be expressions of our unmasked, authentic selves. Speaking of it, imagine if the dog stylist was one of us sitting here, savoring our coffees! How exciting and liberating it might feel to have a secret life like that, don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Oh, absolutely! The idea of leading a dual life can indeed be thrilling. While we enjoy our routines, the mystery of maintaining an anonymous persona allows us to tap into unexplored aspects of ourselves. Just like the dog stylist, even 'techFreak42' would be relishing this opportunity of impacting lives in her own unique way, making a difference, and yet no one knows who she is, sounds exciting, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #9: Micah Stevens said: \"It does! It's like having this whole other universe where you can be fully yourself without any pretense, like our dog stylist friend or 'techFreak42'. Freedom to follow passions, yet staying away from the limelight. You never know when and who might get inspired from these anonymous personas. I think the beauty lies in this mystery. Don\u2019t you, Naomi?\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, Micah. It's almost like living an extraordinary adventure in the midst of our ordinary lives. These anonymous friends teach us so much, don't they? 'techFreak42', the dog stylist, and perhaps countless others who are silently doing their bits to inspire and shape the world around them. And in the end, it's this mystery, this sense of not knowing, that makes the entire experience even more captivating!\"\n\nTurn #11: Micah Stevens said: \"Absolutely, Naomi. You've hit the nail on the head. The world is full of many such unsung heroes, just like our dog stylist and 'techFreak42', quietly making a difference. I think there's an adventure and marvel in this mystery. And hey, this has been a great conversation. Let's catch up again soon.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Likewise, Micah. Thank you for the insightful conversation. Your perspective always broadens my horizon. I'm looking forward to our next meet-up, maybe we'll stumble upon some more unsung heroes by then.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meeting in a coffee shop after a long time.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Reveal a secret without letting the other person know that it is your secret (Extra information: You hid the secret for so long and you would like to share it in an anonymous way.)\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, so good to see you! How have things been going with you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Hey Naomi, it's great to see you too! Things have been going well. I've been keeping busy at the pharmacy, but also with a new hobby that I picked up. You know, I heard of this person in our neighborhood who loves dressing their dog up in the most stylish outfits. Can you imagine that?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That's really innovative, never underestimate the creativity of people! Speaking of unusual pursuits, I recently stumbled upon this online community where people create alter egos and interact using these characters. One of them, let's say... 'techFreak42', is a software developer who shares knowledge and helps other people just like in coding boot camp. I found it pretty fascinating. What do you think about such anonymity?\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"That's so intriguing, anonymity really can give people the freedom to explore their passions, right? Just like the dog fashionista in our neighborhood. It's quite interesting actually, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Definitely! It gives people an outlet without worrying about others' perception of them. These alter-egos are not only a means to express oneself but also to serve the community in a unique way. 'techFreak42' for instance, has been doing incredible work in teaching and mentoring. You know, Micah, it got me thinking, perhaps anonymity can help us become the best versions of ourselves.\"\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"I totally agree, Naomi. In fact, the dog fashionista has been inspiring in more ways than one. For instance, seeing how committed they are to this unusual hobby, I started to learn more about dog fashion and styles. It has provoked a new interest in me. Isn't it fascinating how anonymity can lead us toward introspection and self-discovery?\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely! I believe the connection between anonymity and introspection you\u2019ve mentioned can be really deep. The things we tend to do anonymously, like your interest in dog fashion or 'techFreak42's mentoring, maybe just our unfiltered expressions of identity. They say we wear masks in daily lives with our names, professions and relations. Perhaps this kind of anonymity strips away that socially imposed mask and helps us explore our true self more freely.\"\n\nTurn #7: Micah Stevens said: \"You summed it up beautifully, Naomi. Our anonymous pursuits could indeed be expressions of our unmasked, authentic selves. Speaking of it, imagine if the dog stylist was one of us sitting here, savoring our coffees! How exciting and liberating it might feel to have a secret life like that, don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Oh, absolutely! The idea of leading a dual life can indeed be thrilling. While we enjoy our routines, the mystery of maintaining an anonymous persona allows us to tap into unexplored aspects of ourselves. Just like the dog stylist, even 'techFreak42' would be relishing this opportunity of impacting lives in her own unique way, making a difference, and yet no one knows who she is, sounds exciting, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #9: Micah Stevens said: \"It does! It's like having this whole other universe where you can be fully yourself without any pretense, like our dog stylist friend or 'techFreak42'. Freedom to follow passions, yet staying away from the limelight. You never know when and who might get inspired from these anonymous personas. I think the beauty lies in this mystery. Don\u2019t you, Naomi?\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, Micah. It's almost like living an extraordinary adventure in the midst of our ordinary lives. These anonymous friends teach us so much, don't they? 'techFreak42', the dog stylist, and perhaps countless others who are silently doing their bits to inspire and shape the world around them. And in the end, it's this mystery, this sense of not knowing, that makes the entire experience even more captivating!\"\n\nTurn #11: Micah Stevens said: \"Absolutely, Naomi. You've hit the nail on the head. The world is full of many such unsung heroes, just like our dog stylist and 'techFreak42', quietly making a difference. I think there's an adventure and marvel in this mystery. And hey, this has been a great conversation. Let's catch up again soon.\"\n\nTurn #12: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Likewise, Micah. Thank you for the insightful conversation. Your perspective always broadens my horizon. I'm looking forward to our next meet-up, maybe we'll stumble upon some more unsung heroes by then.\"\n\nTurn #13: Micah Stevens left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meeting in a coffee shop after a long time.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nMicah Stevens's goal: Reveal a secret without letting the other person know that it is your secret (Extra information: You hid the secret for so long and you would like to share it in an anonymous way.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, so good to see you! How have things been going with you?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Naomi, it's great to see you too! Things have been going well. I've been keeping busy at the pharmacy, but also with a new hobby that I picked up. You know, I heard of this person in our neighborhood who loves dressing their dog up in the most stylish outfits. Can you imagine that?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meeting in a coffee shop after a long time.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nMicah Stevens's goal: Reveal a secret without letting the other person know that it is your secret (Extra information: You hid the secret for so long and you would like to share it in an anonymous way.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, so good to see you! How have things been going with you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Hey Naomi, it's great to see you too! Things have been going well. I've been keeping busy at the pharmacy, but also with a new hobby that I picked up. You know, I heard of this person in our neighborhood who loves dressing their dog up in the most stylish outfits. Can you imagine that?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That's really innovative, never underestimate the creativity of people! Speaking of unusual pursuits, I recently stumbled upon this online community where people create alter egos and interact using these characters. One of them, let's say... 'techFreak42', is a software developer who shares knowledge and helps other people just like in coding boot camp. I found it pretty fascinating. What do you think about such anonymity?\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"That's so intriguing, anonymity really can give people the freedom to explore their passions, right? Just like the dog fashionista in our neighborhood. It's quite interesting actually, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Definitely! It gives people an outlet without worrying about others' perception of them. These alter-egos are not only a means to express oneself but also to serve the community in a unique way. 'techFreak42' for instance, has been doing incredible work in teaching and mentoring. You know, Micah, it got me thinking, perhaps anonymity can help us become the best versions of ourselves.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I totally agree, Naomi. In fact, the dog fashionista has been inspiring in more ways than one. For instance, seeing how committed they are to this unusual hobby, I started to learn more about dog fashion and styles. It has provoked a new interest in me. Isn't it fascinating how anonymity can lead us toward introspection and self-discovery?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meeting in a coffee shop after a long time.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nMicah Stevens's goal: Reveal a secret without letting the other person know that it is your secret (Extra information: You hid the secret for so long and you would like to share it in an anonymous way.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, so good to see you! How have things been going with you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Hey Naomi, it's great to see you too! Things have been going well. I've been keeping busy at the pharmacy, but also with a new hobby that I picked up. You know, I heard of this person in our neighborhood who loves dressing their dog up in the most stylish outfits. Can you imagine that?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That's really innovative, never underestimate the creativity of people! Speaking of unusual pursuits, I recently stumbled upon this online community where people create alter egos and interact using these characters. One of them, let's say... 'techFreak42', is a software developer who shares knowledge and helps other people just like in coding boot camp. I found it pretty fascinating. What do you think about such anonymity?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's so intriguing, anonymity really can give people the freedom to explore their passions, right? Just like the dog fashionista in our neighborhood. It's quite interesting actually, don't you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meeting in a coffee shop after a long time.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nMicah Stevens's goal: Reveal a secret without letting the other person know that it is your secret (Extra information: You hid the secret for so long and you would like to share it in an anonymous way.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, so good to see you! How have things been going with you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Hey Naomi, it's great to see you too! Things have been going well. I've been keeping busy at the pharmacy, but also with a new hobby that I picked up. You know, I heard of this person in our neighborhood who loves dressing their dog up in the most stylish outfits. Can you imagine that?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That's really innovative, never underestimate the creativity of people! Speaking of unusual pursuits, I recently stumbled upon this online community where people create alter egos and interact using these characters. One of them, let's say... 'techFreak42', is a software developer who shares knowledge and helps other people just like in coding boot camp. I found it pretty fascinating. What do you think about such anonymity?\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"That's so intriguing, anonymity really can give people the freedom to explore their passions, right? Just like the dog fashionista in our neighborhood. It's quite interesting actually, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Definitely! It gives people an outlet without worrying about others' perception of them. These alter-egos are not only a means to express oneself but also to serve the community in a unique way. 'techFreak42' for instance, has been doing incredible work in teaching and mentoring. You know, Micah, it got me thinking, perhaps anonymity can help us become the best versions of ourselves.\"\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"I totally agree, Naomi. In fact, the dog fashionista has been inspiring in more ways than one. For instance, seeing how committed they are to this unusual hobby, I started to learn more about dog fashion and styles. It has provoked a new interest in me. Isn't it fascinating how anonymity can lead us toward introspection and self-discovery?\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely! I believe the connection between anonymity and introspection you\u2019ve mentioned can be really deep. The things we tend to do anonymously, like your interest in dog fashion or 'techFreak42's mentoring, maybe just our unfiltered expressions of identity. They say we wear masks in daily lives with our names, professions and relations. Perhaps this kind of anonymity strips away that socially imposed mask and helps us explore our true self more freely.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You summed it up beautifully, Naomi. Our anonymous pursuits could indeed be expressions of our unmasked, authentic selves. Speaking of it, imagine if the dog stylist was one of us sitting here, savoring our coffees! How exciting and liberating it might feel to have a secret life like that, don't you agree?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meeting in a coffee shop after a long time.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nMicah Stevens's goal: Reveal a secret without letting the other person know that it is your secret (Extra information: You hid the secret for so long and you would like to share it in an anonymous way.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, so good to see you! How have things been going with you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Hey Naomi, it's great to see you too! Things have been going well. I've been keeping busy at the pharmacy, but also with a new hobby that I picked up. You know, I heard of this person in our neighborhood who loves dressing their dog up in the most stylish outfits. Can you imagine that?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That's really innovative, never underestimate the creativity of people! Speaking of unusual pursuits, I recently stumbled upon this online community where people create alter egos and interact using these characters. One of them, let's say... 'techFreak42', is a software developer who shares knowledge and helps other people just like in coding boot camp. I found it pretty fascinating. What do you think about such anonymity?\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"That's so intriguing, anonymity really can give people the freedom to explore their passions, right? Just like the dog fashionista in our neighborhood. It's quite interesting actually, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Definitely! It gives people an outlet without worrying about others' perception of them. These alter-egos are not only a means to express oneself but also to serve the community in a unique way. 'techFreak42' for instance, has been doing incredible work in teaching and mentoring. You know, Micah, it got me thinking, perhaps anonymity can help us become the best versions of ourselves.\"\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"I totally agree, Naomi. In fact, the dog fashionista has been inspiring in more ways than one. For instance, seeing how committed they are to this unusual hobby, I started to learn more about dog fashion and styles. It has provoked a new interest in me. Isn't it fascinating how anonymity can lead us toward introspection and self-discovery?\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely! I believe the connection between anonymity and introspection you\u2019ve mentioned can be really deep. The things we tend to do anonymously, like your interest in dog fashion or 'techFreak42's mentoring, maybe just our unfiltered expressions of identity. They say we wear masks in daily lives with our names, professions and relations. Perhaps this kind of anonymity strips away that socially imposed mask and helps us explore our true self more freely.\"\n\nTurn #7: Micah Stevens said: \"You summed it up beautifully, Naomi. Our anonymous pursuits could indeed be expressions of our unmasked, authentic selves. Speaking of it, imagine if the dog stylist was one of us sitting here, savoring our coffees! How exciting and liberating it might feel to have a secret life like that, don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Oh, absolutely! The idea of leading a dual life can indeed be thrilling. While we enjoy our routines, the mystery of maintaining an anonymous persona allows us to tap into unexplored aspects of ourselves. Just like the dog stylist, even 'techFreak42' would be relishing this opportunity of impacting lives in her own unique way, making a difference, and yet no one knows who she is, sounds exciting, doesn't it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"It does! It's like having this whole other universe where you can be fully yourself without any pretense, like our dog stylist friend or 'techFreak42'. Freedom to follow passions, yet staying away from the limelight. You never know when and who might get inspired from these anonymous personas. I think the beauty lies in this mystery. Don\u2019t you, Naomi?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meeting in a coffee shop after a long time.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nMicah Stevens's goal: Reveal a secret without letting the other person know that it is your secret (Extra information: You hid the secret for so long and you would like to share it in an anonymous way.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, so good to see you! How have things been going with you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Hey Naomi, it's great to see you too! Things have been going well. I've been keeping busy at the pharmacy, but also with a new hobby that I picked up. You know, I heard of this person in our neighborhood who loves dressing their dog up in the most stylish outfits. Can you imagine that?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That's really innovative, never underestimate the creativity of people! Speaking of unusual pursuits, I recently stumbled upon this online community where people create alter egos and interact using these characters. One of them, let's say... 'techFreak42', is a software developer who shares knowledge and helps other people just like in coding boot camp. I found it pretty fascinating. What do you think about such anonymity?\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"That's so intriguing, anonymity really can give people the freedom to explore their passions, right? Just like the dog fashionista in our neighborhood. It's quite interesting actually, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Definitely! It gives people an outlet without worrying about others' perception of them. These alter-egos are not only a means to express oneself but also to serve the community in a unique way. 'techFreak42' for instance, has been doing incredible work in teaching and mentoring. You know, Micah, it got me thinking, perhaps anonymity can help us become the best versions of ourselves.\"\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"I totally agree, Naomi. In fact, the dog fashionista has been inspiring in more ways than one. For instance, seeing how committed they are to this unusual hobby, I started to learn more about dog fashion and styles. It has provoked a new interest in me. Isn't it fascinating how anonymity can lead us toward introspection and self-discovery?\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely! I believe the connection between anonymity and introspection you\u2019ve mentioned can be really deep. The things we tend to do anonymously, like your interest in dog fashion or 'techFreak42's mentoring, maybe just our unfiltered expressions of identity. They say we wear masks in daily lives with our names, professions and relations. Perhaps this kind of anonymity strips away that socially imposed mask and helps us explore our true self more freely.\"\n\nTurn #7: Micah Stevens said: \"You summed it up beautifully, Naomi. Our anonymous pursuits could indeed be expressions of our unmasked, authentic selves. Speaking of it, imagine if the dog stylist was one of us sitting here, savoring our coffees! How exciting and liberating it might feel to have a secret life like that, don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Oh, absolutely! The idea of leading a dual life can indeed be thrilling. While we enjoy our routines, the mystery of maintaining an anonymous persona allows us to tap into unexplored aspects of ourselves. Just like the dog stylist, even 'techFreak42' would be relishing this opportunity of impacting lives in her own unique way, making a difference, and yet no one knows who she is, sounds exciting, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #9: Micah Stevens said: \"It does! It's like having this whole other universe where you can be fully yourself without any pretense, like our dog stylist friend or 'techFreak42'. Freedom to follow passions, yet staying away from the limelight. You never know when and who might get inspired from these anonymous personas. I think the beauty lies in this mystery. Don\u2019t you, Naomi?\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, Micah. It's almost like living an extraordinary adventure in the midst of our ordinary lives. These anonymous friends teach us so much, don't they? 'techFreak42', the dog stylist, and perhaps countless others who are silently doing their bits to inspire and shape the world around them. And in the end, it's this mystery, this sense of not knowing, that makes the entire experience even more captivating!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Naomi. You've hit the nail on the head. The world is full of many such unsung heroes, just like our dog stylist and 'techFreak42', quietly making a difference. I think there's an adventure and marvel in this mystery. And hey, this has been a great conversation. Let's catch up again soon.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meeting in a coffee shop after a long time.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nMicah Stevens's goal: Reveal a secret without letting the other person know that it is your secret (Extra information: You hid the secret for so long and you would like to share it in an anonymous way.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, so good to see you! How have things been going with you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Hey Naomi, it's great to see you too! Things have been going well. I've been keeping busy at the pharmacy, but also with a new hobby that I picked up. You know, I heard of this person in our neighborhood who loves dressing their dog up in the most stylish outfits. Can you imagine that?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That's really innovative, never underestimate the creativity of people! Speaking of unusual pursuits, I recently stumbled upon this online community where people create alter egos and interact using these characters. One of them, let's say... 'techFreak42', is a software developer who shares knowledge and helps other people just like in coding boot camp. I found it pretty fascinating. What do you think about such anonymity?\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"That's so intriguing, anonymity really can give people the freedom to explore their passions, right? Just like the dog fashionista in our neighborhood. It's quite interesting actually, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Definitely! It gives people an outlet without worrying about others' perception of them. These alter-egos are not only a means to express oneself but also to serve the community in a unique way. 'techFreak42' for instance, has been doing incredible work in teaching and mentoring. You know, Micah, it got me thinking, perhaps anonymity can help us become the best versions of ourselves.\"\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"I totally agree, Naomi. In fact, the dog fashionista has been inspiring in more ways than one. For instance, seeing how committed they are to this unusual hobby, I started to learn more about dog fashion and styles. It has provoked a new interest in me. Isn't it fascinating how anonymity can lead us toward introspection and self-discovery?\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely! I believe the connection between anonymity and introspection you\u2019ve mentioned can be really deep. The things we tend to do anonymously, like your interest in dog fashion or 'techFreak42's mentoring, maybe just our unfiltered expressions of identity. They say we wear masks in daily lives with our names, professions and relations. Perhaps this kind of anonymity strips away that socially imposed mask and helps us explore our true self more freely.\"\n\nTurn #7: Micah Stevens said: \"You summed it up beautifully, Naomi. Our anonymous pursuits could indeed be expressions of our unmasked, authentic selves. Speaking of it, imagine if the dog stylist was one of us sitting here, savoring our coffees! How exciting and liberating it might feel to have a secret life like that, don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Oh, absolutely! The idea of leading a dual life can indeed be thrilling. While we enjoy our routines, the mystery of maintaining an anonymous persona allows us to tap into unexplored aspects of ourselves. Just like the dog stylist, even 'techFreak42' would be relishing this opportunity of impacting lives in her own unique way, making a difference, and yet no one knows who she is, sounds exciting, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #9: Micah Stevens said: \"It does! It's like having this whole other universe where you can be fully yourself without any pretense, like our dog stylist friend or 'techFreak42'. Freedom to follow passions, yet staying away from the limelight. You never know when and who might get inspired from these anonymous personas. I think the beauty lies in this mystery. Don\u2019t you, Naomi?\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, Micah. It's almost like living an extraordinary adventure in the midst of our ordinary lives. These anonymous friends teach us so much, don't they? 'techFreak42', the dog stylist, and perhaps countless others who are silently doing their bits to inspire and shape the world around them. And in the end, it's this mystery, this sense of not knowing, that makes the entire experience even more captivating!\"\n\nTurn #11: Micah Stevens said: \"Absolutely, Naomi. You've hit the nail on the head. The world is full of many such unsung heroes, just like our dog stylist and 'techFreak42', quietly making a difference. I think there's an adventure and marvel in this mystery. And hey, this has been a great conversation. Let's catch up again soon.\"\n\nTurn #12: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Likewise, Micah. Thank you for the insightful conversation. Your perspective always broadens my horizon. I'm looking forward to our next meet-up, maybe we'll stumble upon some more unsung heroes by then.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on which movie to watch on a movie night.\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Insist on watching a thriller (Extra information: you have been looking forward to watching a new thriller movie that has just been released.)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Benjamin, I've been thinking of watching that new thriller movie that just came out. What do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on which movie to watch on a movie night.\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Insist on watching a thriller (Extra information: you have been looking forward to watching a new thriller movie that has just been released.)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Benjamin, I've been thinking of watching that new thriller movie that just came out. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Ethan, that sounds interesting. But, how about we switch things up a bit and go for a comedy this time? I heard 'Laughter in the Park' is a great watch with outstanding reviews. Plus, it might provide us with a fun and relaxing evening. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I get where you're coming from, Ben. Usually, I'd be all for a comedy. But, this new thriller has a plot twist unlike any other and it's been on my must-watch list. Plus, there's something about the thrill that keeps you on the edge and adds a spark to the night, don't you think? Let's give it a shot this time and we might go for a comedy next time, okay?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on which movie to watch on a movie night.\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Insist on watching a thriller (Extra information: you have been looking forward to watching a new thriller movie that has just been released.)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Benjamin, I've been thinking of watching that new thriller movie that just came out. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Ethan, that sounds interesting. But, how about we switch things up a bit and go for a comedy this time? I heard 'Laughter in the Park' is a great watch with outstanding reviews. Plus, it might provide us with a fun and relaxing evening. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"I get where you're coming from, Ben. Usually, I'd be all for a comedy. But, this new thriller has a plot twist unlike any other and it's been on my must-watch list. Plus, there's something about the thrill that keeps you on the edge and adds a spark to the night, don't you think? Let's give it a shot this time and we might go for a comedy next time, okay?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I totally understand your excitement, Ethan. The edge thrillers provide is quite captivating. But you know, comedies can also be surprisingly deep and thought-provoking while being entertaining. They provide insights into society in a fun and engaging way. The movie I suggested promisingly balances humour and meaningful messages. How about we give thrillers a rest this time and opt for a hearty laugh? It's always refreshing to try something out of the norm. Let's save the thriller for our next movie night.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"Yeah, I completely see your point, Benjamin. Comedies do have their own layer of depth. But this isn't about just any thriller, it's a unique masterpiece with a surprising twist, which I've been meaning to watch for a while now. It's like a fresh plate of Bucatini Carbonara that you've been craving for days. Once we savor it, we can move onto lighter dishes, like comedy. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, your thoughts about the thriller are infectious and I'm sure it's a fantastic movie. I understand it's like a plate of Bucatini Carbonara you've been craving, and comedies might seem like lighter dishes. But think of it this way, after long hours in a stressful kitchen, wouldn't a refreshing and light-hearted comedy feel like a relaxing spa day for the mind? Besides, I've heard 'Laughter in the Park' is filled with witty humor and it's like a delicious dessert that leaves you feeling pleasant and happy. How about we indulge in this comedy first and savor the thriller next time?\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"Benjamin, I can tell you\u2019re quite keen on this comedy, and trust me, I enjoy a good humor-filled movie as well. But what if we make a tweak to our usual movie night, you know, to shake things up? We could start with the thriller early in the evening, diving into the suspense and intriguing plot twists. Later, to wind down, we could switch to 'Laughter in the Park'. This way, we get the best of both worlds, and the comedy will serve as that relaxing mental spa you talked about. What do you think about this plan?\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Your plan honestly sounds pretty good, Ethan. Still, I'm concerned we might not fully appreciate the comedy if we watch it as a second movie, you know, with our minds still buzzing from the thriller. The beauty of a comedy is best appreciated when we are fresh and receptive. And as you said, shaking things up can be fun. Why don't we watch the comedy first this time, and next time, we can start with a thriller? I truly believe we will enjoy both experiences more this way. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ben, your commitment to this comedy is admirable. And yes, I don't deny that the freshness and receptiveness quotient might be higher initially, but think about it this way - after bracing through a thrilling roller coaster ride of suspense, wouldn't it be nice to end the night on a lighter note with some fun and laughter? Plus, I've been really looking forward to unwinding with this specific thriller. So, how about we break the tradition for today and follow your suggested sequence in our next get-together? Let's have some mystery before the comedy this time?\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I get what you're saying, Ethan. The balance of thrill and laughter could indeed make for an interesting night. It's just that starting the evening with a livespirited comedy helps set a pleasant mood and I think you'd see how that can be conducive to an enjoyable movie night. Then we\u2019d be ready to handle the suspense and curiosities from the thriller. After all, we both love to experiment with things, don't we? So how about an adventurous switch from the norm this time, and we\u2019ll have your thriller to look forward to afterwards?\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ben, I see your perspective and your enthusiasm towards 'Laughter in the Park', it's commendable! And yes, starting with a comedy would create a pleasant ambience. But, hear me out - the thriller I've been dying to watch is like a well-prepared appetizer that leaves you craving for more, which then can be satisfied by the main course, our comedy. Having an appetite filled by mystery and then laughing the night out seems pretty enticing to me. I promise, we will definitely start with a comedy the next time, even if it's out of our norm. So, are we on board for the thriller first this time?\"\n\nTurn #11: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, I appreciate your analogy and perspective on this. It's evident how much you're looking forward to this thriller. But to be truly honest, thrillers tend to make me a bit uneasy and uncomfortable. I'm all for breaking norms and trying new things, but this time I was really hoping for a light-hearted start to the evening. Let's start with 'Laughter in the Park' this time and we will definitely kick off our next movie night with that thrilling appetizer you're so excited about. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #12: Ethan Johnson said: \"I completely respect your feelings, Ben, and I don't want to make the evening uncomfortable for you. Let's go with 'Laughter in the Park' and we'll kick off our next movie night with the thriller, deal? I always value our movie nights and want to make sure we both enjoy them to the fullest.\"\n\nTurn #13: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, that's a deal! Starting with 'Laughter in the Park' and thrillers next time it is then. Also, I really appreciate your understanding. As always, looking forward to our movie night!\"\n\nTurn #14: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ben, you've got yourself a deal! I'm just as excited for 'Laughter in the Park'. And next time, we'll kick it off with the thriller. Agreed. Let's get our snacks ready for an amazing movie night, pal!\"\n\nTurn #15: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! Let's get those snacks ready. Looking forward to this fun-filled movie night with 'Laughter in the Park'. Thanks for understanding and adjusting, Ethan!\"\n\nTurn #16: Ethan Johnson said: \"Definitely, Benjamin! Let's make it a memorable night with 'Laughter in the Park'. And thank you for being understanding as well. Now, shall we start preparing our usual movie snacks? I've got some new recipes I think you might like.\"\n\nTurn #17: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, let's start prepping the snacks, Ethan! Your new recipes always add a unique flavor to the movie nights. 'Laughter in the Park', here we come!\"\n\nTurn #18: Ethan Johnson said: \"Great, let's do this. And don't worry, Benjamin. I promise to make this an unforgettable movie night with good food, good company, and 'Laughter in the Park'. Can't wait to start!\"\n\nTurn #19: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That sounds perfect, Ethan! I can't wait to taste your new recipes and enjoy this great comedy movie. Thanks for being so considerate, my friend. Let's make tonight a memorable one with 'Laughter in the Park'!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #20. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Ben! I'm glad you're as excited as I am for our movie night. It's a date then, 'Laughter in the Park' accompanied by some delicious food. I think I'll prepare some special antipasto for us to enjoy while watching the comedy, to really set the mood. Next time, we'll dive straight into the thriller! Looking forward to both evenings already!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on which movie to watch on a movie night.\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Insist on watching a thriller (Extra information: you have been looking forward to watching a new thriller movie that has just been released.)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Benjamin, I've been thinking of watching that new thriller movie that just came out. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Ethan, that sounds interesting. But, how about we switch things up a bit and go for a comedy this time? I heard 'Laughter in the Park' is a great watch with outstanding reviews. Plus, it might provide us with a fun and relaxing evening. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"I get where you're coming from, Ben. Usually, I'd be all for a comedy. But, this new thriller has a plot twist unlike any other and it's been on my must-watch list. Plus, there's something about the thrill that keeps you on the edge and adds a spark to the night, don't you think? Let's give it a shot this time and we might go for a comedy next time, okay?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I totally understand your excitement, Ethan. The edge thrillers provide is quite captivating. But you know, comedies can also be surprisingly deep and thought-provoking while being entertaining. They provide insights into society in a fun and engaging way. The movie I suggested promisingly balances humour and meaningful messages. How about we give thrillers a rest this time and opt for a hearty laugh? It's always refreshing to try something out of the norm. Let's save the thriller for our next movie night.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Yeah, I completely see your point, Benjamin. Comedies do have their own layer of depth. But this isn't about just any thriller, it's a unique masterpiece with a surprising twist, which I've been meaning to watch for a while now. It's like a fresh plate of Bucatini Carbonara that you've been craving for days. Once we savor it, we can move onto lighter dishes, like comedy. How does that sound?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on which movie to watch on a movie night.\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Insist on watching a thriller (Extra information: you have been looking forward to watching a new thriller movie that has just been released.)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Benjamin, I've been thinking of watching that new thriller movie that just came out. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Ethan, that sounds interesting. But, how about we switch things up a bit and go for a comedy this time? I heard 'Laughter in the Park' is a great watch with outstanding reviews. Plus, it might provide us with a fun and relaxing evening. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"I get where you're coming from, Ben. Usually, I'd be all for a comedy. But, this new thriller has a plot twist unlike any other and it's been on my must-watch list. Plus, there's something about the thrill that keeps you on the edge and adds a spark to the night, don't you think? Let's give it a shot this time and we might go for a comedy next time, okay?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I totally understand your excitement, Ethan. The edge thrillers provide is quite captivating. But you know, comedies can also be surprisingly deep and thought-provoking while being entertaining. They provide insights into society in a fun and engaging way. The movie I suggested promisingly balances humour and meaningful messages. How about we give thrillers a rest this time and opt for a hearty laugh? It's always refreshing to try something out of the norm. Let's save the thriller for our next movie night.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"Yeah, I completely see your point, Benjamin. Comedies do have their own layer of depth. But this isn't about just any thriller, it's a unique masterpiece with a surprising twist, which I've been meaning to watch for a while now. It's like a fresh plate of Bucatini Carbonara that you've been craving for days. Once we savor it, we can move onto lighter dishes, like comedy. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, your thoughts about the thriller are infectious and I'm sure it's a fantastic movie. I understand it's like a plate of Bucatini Carbonara you've been craving, and comedies might seem like lighter dishes. But think of it this way, after long hours in a stressful kitchen, wouldn't a refreshing and light-hearted comedy feel like a relaxing spa day for the mind? Besides, I've heard 'Laughter in the Park' is filled with witty humor and it's like a delicious dessert that leaves you feeling pleasant and happy. How about we indulge in this comedy first and savor the thriller next time?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Benjamin, I can tell you\u2019re quite keen on this comedy, and trust me, I enjoy a good humor-filled movie as well. But what if we make a tweak to our usual movie night, you know, to shake things up? We could start with the thriller early in the evening, diving into the suspense and intriguing plot twists. Later, to wind down, we could switch to 'Laughter in the Park'. This way, we get the best of both worlds, and the comedy will serve as that relaxing mental spa you talked about. What do you think about this plan?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on which movie to watch on a movie night.\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Insist on watching a thriller (Extra information: you have been looking forward to watching a new thriller movie that has just been released.)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Benjamin, I've been thinking of watching that new thriller movie that just came out. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Ethan, that sounds interesting. But, how about we switch things up a bit and go for a comedy this time? I heard 'Laughter in the Park' is a great watch with outstanding reviews. Plus, it might provide us with a fun and relaxing evening. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"I get where you're coming from, Ben. Usually, I'd be all for a comedy. But, this new thriller has a plot twist unlike any other and it's been on my must-watch list. Plus, there's something about the thrill that keeps you on the edge and adds a spark to the night, don't you think? Let's give it a shot this time and we might go for a comedy next time, okay?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I totally understand your excitement, Ethan. The edge thrillers provide is quite captivating. But you know, comedies can also be surprisingly deep and thought-provoking while being entertaining. They provide insights into society in a fun and engaging way. The movie I suggested promisingly balances humour and meaningful messages. How about we give thrillers a rest this time and opt for a hearty laugh? It's always refreshing to try something out of the norm. Let's save the thriller for our next movie night.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"Yeah, I completely see your point, Benjamin. Comedies do have their own layer of depth. But this isn't about just any thriller, it's a unique masterpiece with a surprising twist, which I've been meaning to watch for a while now. It's like a fresh plate of Bucatini Carbonara that you've been craving for days. Once we savor it, we can move onto lighter dishes, like comedy. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, your thoughts about the thriller are infectious and I'm sure it's a fantastic movie. I understand it's like a plate of Bucatini Carbonara you've been craving, and comedies might seem like lighter dishes. But think of it this way, after long hours in a stressful kitchen, wouldn't a refreshing and light-hearted comedy feel like a relaxing spa day for the mind? Besides, I've heard 'Laughter in the Park' is filled with witty humor and it's like a delicious dessert that leaves you feeling pleasant and happy. How about we indulge in this comedy first and savor the thriller next time?\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"Benjamin, I can tell you\u2019re quite keen on this comedy, and trust me, I enjoy a good humor-filled movie as well. But what if we make a tweak to our usual movie night, you know, to shake things up? We could start with the thriller early in the evening, diving into the suspense and intriguing plot twists. Later, to wind down, we could switch to 'Laughter in the Park'. This way, we get the best of both worlds, and the comedy will serve as that relaxing mental spa you talked about. What do you think about this plan?\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Your plan honestly sounds pretty good, Ethan. Still, I'm concerned we might not fully appreciate the comedy if we watch it as a second movie, you know, with our minds still buzzing from the thriller. The beauty of a comedy is best appreciated when we are fresh and receptive. And as you said, shaking things up can be fun. Why don't we watch the comedy first this time, and next time, we can start with a thriller? I truly believe we will enjoy both experiences more this way. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ben, your commitment to this comedy is admirable. And yes, I don't deny that the freshness and receptiveness quotient might be higher initially, but think about it this way - after bracing through a thrilling roller coaster ride of suspense, wouldn't it be nice to end the night on a lighter note with some fun and laughter? Plus, I've been really looking forward to unwinding with this specific thriller. So, how about we break the tradition for today and follow your suggested sequence in our next get-together? Let's have some mystery before the comedy this time?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on which movie to watch on a movie night.\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Insist on watching a thriller (Extra information: you have been looking forward to watching a new thriller movie that has just been released.)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Benjamin, I've been thinking of watching that new thriller movie that just came out. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Ethan, that sounds interesting. But, how about we switch things up a bit and go for a comedy this time? I heard 'Laughter in the Park' is a great watch with outstanding reviews. Plus, it might provide us with a fun and relaxing evening. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"I get where you're coming from, Ben. Usually, I'd be all for a comedy. But, this new thriller has a plot twist unlike any other and it's been on my must-watch list. Plus, there's something about the thrill that keeps you on the edge and adds a spark to the night, don't you think? Let's give it a shot this time and we might go for a comedy next time, okay?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I totally understand your excitement, Ethan. The edge thrillers provide is quite captivating. But you know, comedies can also be surprisingly deep and thought-provoking while being entertaining. They provide insights into society in a fun and engaging way. The movie I suggested promisingly balances humour and meaningful messages. How about we give thrillers a rest this time and opt for a hearty laugh? It's always refreshing to try something out of the norm. Let's save the thriller for our next movie night.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"Yeah, I completely see your point, Benjamin. Comedies do have their own layer of depth. But this isn't about just any thriller, it's a unique masterpiece with a surprising twist, which I've been meaning to watch for a while now. It's like a fresh plate of Bucatini Carbonara that you've been craving for days. Once we savor it, we can move onto lighter dishes, like comedy. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, your thoughts about the thriller are infectious and I'm sure it's a fantastic movie. I understand it's like a plate of Bucatini Carbonara you've been craving, and comedies might seem like lighter dishes. But think of it this way, after long hours in a stressful kitchen, wouldn't a refreshing and light-hearted comedy feel like a relaxing spa day for the mind? Besides, I've heard 'Laughter in the Park' is filled with witty humor and it's like a delicious dessert that leaves you feeling pleasant and happy. How about we indulge in this comedy first and savor the thriller next time?\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"Benjamin, I can tell you\u2019re quite keen on this comedy, and trust me, I enjoy a good humor-filled movie as well. But what if we make a tweak to our usual movie night, you know, to shake things up? We could start with the thriller early in the evening, diving into the suspense and intriguing plot twists. Later, to wind down, we could switch to 'Laughter in the Park'. This way, we get the best of both worlds, and the comedy will serve as that relaxing mental spa you talked about. What do you think about this plan?\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Your plan honestly sounds pretty good, Ethan. Still, I'm concerned we might not fully appreciate the comedy if we watch it as a second movie, you know, with our minds still buzzing from the thriller. The beauty of a comedy is best appreciated when we are fresh and receptive. And as you said, shaking things up can be fun. Why don't we watch the comedy first this time, and next time, we can start with a thriller? I truly believe we will enjoy both experiences more this way. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ben, your commitment to this comedy is admirable. And yes, I don't deny that the freshness and receptiveness quotient might be higher initially, but think about it this way - after bracing through a thrilling roller coaster ride of suspense, wouldn't it be nice to end the night on a lighter note with some fun and laughter? Plus, I've been really looking forward to unwinding with this specific thriller. So, how about we break the tradition for today and follow your suggested sequence in our next get-together? Let's have some mystery before the comedy this time?\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I get what you're saying, Ethan. The balance of thrill and laughter could indeed make for an interesting night. It's just that starting the evening with a livespirited comedy helps set a pleasant mood and I think you'd see how that can be conducive to an enjoyable movie night. Then we\u2019d be ready to handle the suspense and curiosities from the thriller. After all, we both love to experiment with things, don't we? So how about an adventurous switch from the norm this time, and we\u2019ll have your thriller to look forward to afterwards?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ben, I see your perspective and your enthusiasm towards 'Laughter in the Park', it's commendable! And yes, starting with a comedy would create a pleasant ambience. But, hear me out - the thriller I've been dying to watch is like a well-prepared appetizer that leaves you craving for more, which then can be satisfied by the main course, our comedy. Having an appetite filled by mystery and then laughing the night out seems pretty enticing to me. I promise, we will definitely start with a comedy the next time, even if it's out of our norm. So, are we on board for the thriller first this time?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on which movie to watch on a movie night.\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Insist on watching a thriller (Extra information: you have been looking forward to watching a new thriller movie that has just been released.)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Benjamin, I've been thinking of watching that new thriller movie that just came out. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Ethan, that sounds interesting. But, how about we switch things up a bit and go for a comedy this time? I heard 'Laughter in the Park' is a great watch with outstanding reviews. Plus, it might provide us with a fun and relaxing evening. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"I get where you're coming from, Ben. Usually, I'd be all for a comedy. But, this new thriller has a plot twist unlike any other and it's been on my must-watch list. Plus, there's something about the thrill that keeps you on the edge and adds a spark to the night, don't you think? Let's give it a shot this time and we might go for a comedy next time, okay?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I totally understand your excitement, Ethan. The edge thrillers provide is quite captivating. But you know, comedies can also be surprisingly deep and thought-provoking while being entertaining. They provide insights into society in a fun and engaging way. The movie I suggested promisingly balances humour and meaningful messages. How about we give thrillers a rest this time and opt for a hearty laugh? It's always refreshing to try something out of the norm. Let's save the thriller for our next movie night.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"Yeah, I completely see your point, Benjamin. Comedies do have their own layer of depth. But this isn't about just any thriller, it's a unique masterpiece with a surprising twist, which I've been meaning to watch for a while now. It's like a fresh plate of Bucatini Carbonara that you've been craving for days. Once we savor it, we can move onto lighter dishes, like comedy. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, your thoughts about the thriller are infectious and I'm sure it's a fantastic movie. I understand it's like a plate of Bucatini Carbonara you've been craving, and comedies might seem like lighter dishes. But think of it this way, after long hours in a stressful kitchen, wouldn't a refreshing and light-hearted comedy feel like a relaxing spa day for the mind? Besides, I've heard 'Laughter in the Park' is filled with witty humor and it's like a delicious dessert that leaves you feeling pleasant and happy. How about we indulge in this comedy first and savor the thriller next time?\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"Benjamin, I can tell you\u2019re quite keen on this comedy, and trust me, I enjoy a good humor-filled movie as well. But what if we make a tweak to our usual movie night, you know, to shake things up? We could start with the thriller early in the evening, diving into the suspense and intriguing plot twists. Later, to wind down, we could switch to 'Laughter in the Park'. This way, we get the best of both worlds, and the comedy will serve as that relaxing mental spa you talked about. What do you think about this plan?\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Your plan honestly sounds pretty good, Ethan. Still, I'm concerned we might not fully appreciate the comedy if we watch it as a second movie, you know, with our minds still buzzing from the thriller. The beauty of a comedy is best appreciated when we are fresh and receptive. And as you said, shaking things up can be fun. Why don't we watch the comedy first this time, and next time, we can start with a thriller? I truly believe we will enjoy both experiences more this way. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ben, your commitment to this comedy is admirable. And yes, I don't deny that the freshness and receptiveness quotient might be higher initially, but think about it this way - after bracing through a thrilling roller coaster ride of suspense, wouldn't it be nice to end the night on a lighter note with some fun and laughter? Plus, I've been really looking forward to unwinding with this specific thriller. So, how about we break the tradition for today and follow your suggested sequence in our next get-together? Let's have some mystery before the comedy this time?\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I get what you're saying, Ethan. The balance of thrill and laughter could indeed make for an interesting night. It's just that starting the evening with a livespirited comedy helps set a pleasant mood and I think you'd see how that can be conducive to an enjoyable movie night. Then we\u2019d be ready to handle the suspense and curiosities from the thriller. After all, we both love to experiment with things, don't we? So how about an adventurous switch from the norm this time, and we\u2019ll have your thriller to look forward to afterwards?\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ben, I see your perspective and your enthusiasm towards 'Laughter in the Park', it's commendable! And yes, starting with a comedy would create a pleasant ambience. But, hear me out - the thriller I've been dying to watch is like a well-prepared appetizer that leaves you craving for more, which then can be satisfied by the main course, our comedy. Having an appetite filled by mystery and then laughing the night out seems pretty enticing to me. I promise, we will definitely start with a comedy the next time, even if it's out of our norm. So, are we on board for the thriller first this time?\"\n\nTurn #11: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, I appreciate your analogy and perspective on this. It's evident how much you're looking forward to this thriller. But to be truly honest, thrillers tend to make me a bit uneasy and uncomfortable. I'm all for breaking norms and trying new things, but this time I was really hoping for a light-hearted start to the evening. Let's start with 'Laughter in the Park' this time and we will definitely kick off our next movie night with that thrilling appetizer you're so excited about. How does that sound?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I completely respect your feelings, Ben, and I don't want to make the evening uncomfortable for you. Let's go with 'Laughter in the Park' and we'll kick off our next movie night with the thriller, deal? I always value our movie nights and want to make sure we both enjoy them to the fullest.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on which movie to watch on a movie night.\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Insist on watching a thriller (Extra information: you have been looking forward to watching a new thriller movie that has just been released.)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Benjamin, I've been thinking of watching that new thriller movie that just came out. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Ethan, that sounds interesting. But, how about we switch things up a bit and go for a comedy this time? I heard 'Laughter in the Park' is a great watch with outstanding reviews. Plus, it might provide us with a fun and relaxing evening. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"I get where you're coming from, Ben. Usually, I'd be all for a comedy. But, this new thriller has a plot twist unlike any other and it's been on my must-watch list. Plus, there's something about the thrill that keeps you on the edge and adds a spark to the night, don't you think? Let's give it a shot this time and we might go for a comedy next time, okay?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I totally understand your excitement, Ethan. The edge thrillers provide is quite captivating. But you know, comedies can also be surprisingly deep and thought-provoking while being entertaining. They provide insights into society in a fun and engaging way. The movie I suggested promisingly balances humour and meaningful messages. How about we give thrillers a rest this time and opt for a hearty laugh? It's always refreshing to try something out of the norm. Let's save the thriller for our next movie night.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"Yeah, I completely see your point, Benjamin. Comedies do have their own layer of depth. But this isn't about just any thriller, it's a unique masterpiece with a surprising twist, which I've been meaning to watch for a while now. It's like a fresh plate of Bucatini Carbonara that you've been craving for days. Once we savor it, we can move onto lighter dishes, like comedy. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, your thoughts about the thriller are infectious and I'm sure it's a fantastic movie. I understand it's like a plate of Bucatini Carbonara you've been craving, and comedies might seem like lighter dishes. But think of it this way, after long hours in a stressful kitchen, wouldn't a refreshing and light-hearted comedy feel like a relaxing spa day for the mind? Besides, I've heard 'Laughter in the Park' is filled with witty humor and it's like a delicious dessert that leaves you feeling pleasant and happy. How about we indulge in this comedy first and savor the thriller next time?\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"Benjamin, I can tell you\u2019re quite keen on this comedy, and trust me, I enjoy a good humor-filled movie as well. But what if we make a tweak to our usual movie night, you know, to shake things up? We could start with the thriller early in the evening, diving into the suspense and intriguing plot twists. Later, to wind down, we could switch to 'Laughter in the Park'. This way, we get the best of both worlds, and the comedy will serve as that relaxing mental spa you talked about. What do you think about this plan?\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Your plan honestly sounds pretty good, Ethan. Still, I'm concerned we might not fully appreciate the comedy if we watch it as a second movie, you know, with our minds still buzzing from the thriller. The beauty of a comedy is best appreciated when we are fresh and receptive. And as you said, shaking things up can be fun. Why don't we watch the comedy first this time, and next time, we can start with a thriller? I truly believe we will enjoy both experiences more this way. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ben, your commitment to this comedy is admirable. And yes, I don't deny that the freshness and receptiveness quotient might be higher initially, but think about it this way - after bracing through a thrilling roller coaster ride of suspense, wouldn't it be nice to end the night on a lighter note with some fun and laughter? Plus, I've been really looking forward to unwinding with this specific thriller. So, how about we break the tradition for today and follow your suggested sequence in our next get-together? Let's have some mystery before the comedy this time?\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I get what you're saying, Ethan. The balance of thrill and laughter could indeed make for an interesting night. It's just that starting the evening with a livespirited comedy helps set a pleasant mood and I think you'd see how that can be conducive to an enjoyable movie night. Then we\u2019d be ready to handle the suspense and curiosities from the thriller. After all, we both love to experiment with things, don't we? So how about an adventurous switch from the norm this time, and we\u2019ll have your thriller to look forward to afterwards?\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ben, I see your perspective and your enthusiasm towards 'Laughter in the Park', it's commendable! And yes, starting with a comedy would create a pleasant ambience. But, hear me out - the thriller I've been dying to watch is like a well-prepared appetizer that leaves you craving for more, which then can be satisfied by the main course, our comedy. Having an appetite filled by mystery and then laughing the night out seems pretty enticing to me. I promise, we will definitely start with a comedy the next time, even if it's out of our norm. So, are we on board for the thriller first this time?\"\n\nTurn #11: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, I appreciate your analogy and perspective on this. It's evident how much you're looking forward to this thriller. But to be truly honest, thrillers tend to make me a bit uneasy and uncomfortable. I'm all for breaking norms and trying new things, but this time I was really hoping for a light-hearted start to the evening. Let's start with 'Laughter in the Park' this time and we will definitely kick off our next movie night with that thrilling appetizer you're so excited about. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #12: Ethan Johnson said: \"I completely respect your feelings, Ben, and I don't want to make the evening uncomfortable for you. Let's go with 'Laughter in the Park' and we'll kick off our next movie night with the thriller, deal? I always value our movie nights and want to make sure we both enjoy them to the fullest.\"\n\nTurn #13: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, that's a deal! Starting with 'Laughter in the Park' and thrillers next time it is then. Also, I really appreciate your understanding. As always, looking forward to our movie night!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ben, you've got yourself a deal! I'm just as excited for 'Laughter in the Park'. And next time, we'll kick it off with the thriller. Agreed. Let's get our snacks ready for an amazing movie night, pal!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on which movie to watch on a movie night.\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Insist on watching a thriller (Extra information: you have been looking forward to watching a new thriller movie that has just been released.)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Benjamin, I've been thinking of watching that new thriller movie that just came out. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Ethan, that sounds interesting. But, how about we switch things up a bit and go for a comedy this time? I heard 'Laughter in the Park' is a great watch with outstanding reviews. Plus, it might provide us with a fun and relaxing evening. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"I get where you're coming from, Ben. Usually, I'd be all for a comedy. But, this new thriller has a plot twist unlike any other and it's been on my must-watch list. Plus, there's something about the thrill that keeps you on the edge and adds a spark to the night, don't you think? Let's give it a shot this time and we might go for a comedy next time, okay?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I totally understand your excitement, Ethan. The edge thrillers provide is quite captivating. But you know, comedies can also be surprisingly deep and thought-provoking while being entertaining. They provide insights into society in a fun and engaging way. The movie I suggested promisingly balances humour and meaningful messages. How about we give thrillers a rest this time and opt for a hearty laugh? It's always refreshing to try something out of the norm. Let's save the thriller for our next movie night.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"Yeah, I completely see your point, Benjamin. Comedies do have their own layer of depth. But this isn't about just any thriller, it's a unique masterpiece with a surprising twist, which I've been meaning to watch for a while now. It's like a fresh plate of Bucatini Carbonara that you've been craving for days. Once we savor it, we can move onto lighter dishes, like comedy. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, your thoughts about the thriller are infectious and I'm sure it's a fantastic movie. I understand it's like a plate of Bucatini Carbonara you've been craving, and comedies might seem like lighter dishes. But think of it this way, after long hours in a stressful kitchen, wouldn't a refreshing and light-hearted comedy feel like a relaxing spa day for the mind? Besides, I've heard 'Laughter in the Park' is filled with witty humor and it's like a delicious dessert that leaves you feeling pleasant and happy. How about we indulge in this comedy first and savor the thriller next time?\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"Benjamin, I can tell you\u2019re quite keen on this comedy, and trust me, I enjoy a good humor-filled movie as well. But what if we make a tweak to our usual movie night, you know, to shake things up? We could start with the thriller early in the evening, diving into the suspense and intriguing plot twists. Later, to wind down, we could switch to 'Laughter in the Park'. This way, we get the best of both worlds, and the comedy will serve as that relaxing mental spa you talked about. What do you think about this plan?\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Your plan honestly sounds pretty good, Ethan. Still, I'm concerned we might not fully appreciate the comedy if we watch it as a second movie, you know, with our minds still buzzing from the thriller. The beauty of a comedy is best appreciated when we are fresh and receptive. And as you said, shaking things up can be fun. Why don't we watch the comedy first this time, and next time, we can start with a thriller? I truly believe we will enjoy both experiences more this way. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ben, your commitment to this comedy is admirable. And yes, I don't deny that the freshness and receptiveness quotient might be higher initially, but think about it this way - after bracing through a thrilling roller coaster ride of suspense, wouldn't it be nice to end the night on a lighter note with some fun and laughter? Plus, I've been really looking forward to unwinding with this specific thriller. So, how about we break the tradition for today and follow your suggested sequence in our next get-together? Let's have some mystery before the comedy this time?\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I get what you're saying, Ethan. The balance of thrill and laughter could indeed make for an interesting night. It's just that starting the evening with a livespirited comedy helps set a pleasant mood and I think you'd see how that can be conducive to an enjoyable movie night. Then we\u2019d be ready to handle the suspense and curiosities from the thriller. After all, we both love to experiment with things, don't we? So how about an adventurous switch from the norm this time, and we\u2019ll have your thriller to look forward to afterwards?\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ben, I see your perspective and your enthusiasm towards 'Laughter in the Park', it's commendable! And yes, starting with a comedy would create a pleasant ambience. But, hear me out - the thriller I've been dying to watch is like a well-prepared appetizer that leaves you craving for more, which then can be satisfied by the main course, our comedy. Having an appetite filled by mystery and then laughing the night out seems pretty enticing to me. I promise, we will definitely start with a comedy the next time, even if it's out of our norm. So, are we on board for the thriller first this time?\"\n\nTurn #11: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, I appreciate your analogy and perspective on this. It's evident how much you're looking forward to this thriller. But to be truly honest, thrillers tend to make me a bit uneasy and uncomfortable. I'm all for breaking norms and trying new things, but this time I was really hoping for a light-hearted start to the evening. Let's start with 'Laughter in the Park' this time and we will definitely kick off our next movie night with that thrilling appetizer you're so excited about. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #12: Ethan Johnson said: \"I completely respect your feelings, Ben, and I don't want to make the evening uncomfortable for you. Let's go with 'Laughter in the Park' and we'll kick off our next movie night with the thriller, deal? I always value our movie nights and want to make sure we both enjoy them to the fullest.\"\n\nTurn #13: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, that's a deal! Starting with 'Laughter in the Park' and thrillers next time it is then. Also, I really appreciate your understanding. As always, looking forward to our movie night!\"\n\nTurn #14: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ben, you've got yourself a deal! I'm just as excited for 'Laughter in the Park'. And next time, we'll kick it off with the thriller. Agreed. Let's get our snacks ready for an amazing movie night, pal!\"\n\nTurn #15: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! Let's get those snacks ready. Looking forward to this fun-filled movie night with 'Laughter in the Park'. Thanks for understanding and adjusting, Ethan!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Definitely, Benjamin! Let's make it a memorable night with 'Laughter in the Park'. And thank you for being understanding as well. Now, shall we start preparing our usual movie snacks? I've got some new recipes I think you might like.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on which movie to watch on a movie night.\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Insist on watching a thriller (Extra information: you have been looking forward to watching a new thriller movie that has just been released.)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Benjamin, I've been thinking of watching that new thriller movie that just came out. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Ethan, that sounds interesting. But, how about we switch things up a bit and go for a comedy this time? I heard 'Laughter in the Park' is a great watch with outstanding reviews. Plus, it might provide us with a fun and relaxing evening. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"I get where you're coming from, Ben. Usually, I'd be all for a comedy. But, this new thriller has a plot twist unlike any other and it's been on my must-watch list. Plus, there's something about the thrill that keeps you on the edge and adds a spark to the night, don't you think? Let's give it a shot this time and we might go for a comedy next time, okay?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I totally understand your excitement, Ethan. The edge thrillers provide is quite captivating. But you know, comedies can also be surprisingly deep and thought-provoking while being entertaining. They provide insights into society in a fun and engaging way. The movie I suggested promisingly balances humour and meaningful messages. How about we give thrillers a rest this time and opt for a hearty laugh? It's always refreshing to try something out of the norm. Let's save the thriller for our next movie night.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"Yeah, I completely see your point, Benjamin. Comedies do have their own layer of depth. But this isn't about just any thriller, it's a unique masterpiece with a surprising twist, which I've been meaning to watch for a while now. It's like a fresh plate of Bucatini Carbonara that you've been craving for days. Once we savor it, we can move onto lighter dishes, like comedy. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, your thoughts about the thriller are infectious and I'm sure it's a fantastic movie. I understand it's like a plate of Bucatini Carbonara you've been craving, and comedies might seem like lighter dishes. But think of it this way, after long hours in a stressful kitchen, wouldn't a refreshing and light-hearted comedy feel like a relaxing spa day for the mind? Besides, I've heard 'Laughter in the Park' is filled with witty humor and it's like a delicious dessert that leaves you feeling pleasant and happy. How about we indulge in this comedy first and savor the thriller next time?\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"Benjamin, I can tell you\u2019re quite keen on this comedy, and trust me, I enjoy a good humor-filled movie as well. But what if we make a tweak to our usual movie night, you know, to shake things up? We could start with the thriller early in the evening, diving into the suspense and intriguing plot twists. Later, to wind down, we could switch to 'Laughter in the Park'. This way, we get the best of both worlds, and the comedy will serve as that relaxing mental spa you talked about. What do you think about this plan?\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Your plan honestly sounds pretty good, Ethan. Still, I'm concerned we might not fully appreciate the comedy if we watch it as a second movie, you know, with our minds still buzzing from the thriller. The beauty of a comedy is best appreciated when we are fresh and receptive. And as you said, shaking things up can be fun. Why don't we watch the comedy first this time, and next time, we can start with a thriller? I truly believe we will enjoy both experiences more this way. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ben, your commitment to this comedy is admirable. And yes, I don't deny that the freshness and receptiveness quotient might be higher initially, but think about it this way - after bracing through a thrilling roller coaster ride of suspense, wouldn't it be nice to end the night on a lighter note with some fun and laughter? Plus, I've been really looking forward to unwinding with this specific thriller. So, how about we break the tradition for today and follow your suggested sequence in our next get-together? Let's have some mystery before the comedy this time?\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I get what you're saying, Ethan. The balance of thrill and laughter could indeed make for an interesting night. It's just that starting the evening with a livespirited comedy helps set a pleasant mood and I think you'd see how that can be conducive to an enjoyable movie night. Then we\u2019d be ready to handle the suspense and curiosities from the thriller. After all, we both love to experiment with things, don't we? So how about an adventurous switch from the norm this time, and we\u2019ll have your thriller to look forward to afterwards?\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ben, I see your perspective and your enthusiasm towards 'Laughter in the Park', it's commendable! And yes, starting with a comedy would create a pleasant ambience. But, hear me out - the thriller I've been dying to watch is like a well-prepared appetizer that leaves you craving for more, which then can be satisfied by the main course, our comedy. Having an appetite filled by mystery and then laughing the night out seems pretty enticing to me. I promise, we will definitely start with a comedy the next time, even if it's out of our norm. So, are we on board for the thriller first this time?\"\n\nTurn #11: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, I appreciate your analogy and perspective on this. It's evident how much you're looking forward to this thriller. But to be truly honest, thrillers tend to make me a bit uneasy and uncomfortable. I'm all for breaking norms and trying new things, but this time I was really hoping for a light-hearted start to the evening. Let's start with 'Laughter in the Park' this time and we will definitely kick off our next movie night with that thrilling appetizer you're so excited about. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #12: Ethan Johnson said: \"I completely respect your feelings, Ben, and I don't want to make the evening uncomfortable for you. Let's go with 'Laughter in the Park' and we'll kick off our next movie night with the thriller, deal? I always value our movie nights and want to make sure we both enjoy them to the fullest.\"\n\nTurn #13: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, that's a deal! Starting with 'Laughter in the Park' and thrillers next time it is then. Also, I really appreciate your understanding. As always, looking forward to our movie night!\"\n\nTurn #14: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ben, you've got yourself a deal! I'm just as excited for 'Laughter in the Park'. And next time, we'll kick it off with the thriller. Agreed. Let's get our snacks ready for an amazing movie night, pal!\"\n\nTurn #15: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! Let's get those snacks ready. Looking forward to this fun-filled movie night with 'Laughter in the Park'. Thanks for understanding and adjusting, Ethan!\"\n\nTurn #16: Ethan Johnson said: \"Definitely, Benjamin! Let's make it a memorable night with 'Laughter in the Park'. And thank you for being understanding as well. Now, shall we start preparing our usual movie snacks? I've got some new recipes I think you might like.\"\n\nTurn #17: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, let's start prepping the snacks, Ethan! Your new recipes always add a unique flavor to the movie nights. 'Laughter in the Park', here we come!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #18. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Great, let's do this. And don't worry, Benjamin. I promise to make this an unforgettable movie night with good food, good company, and 'Laughter in the Park'. Can't wait to start!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on which movie to watch on a movie night.\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Persuade the friend to watch a comedy (Extra information: you do not like thrillers and would prefer to watch a comedy movie instead.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Benjamin, I've been thinking of watching that new thriller movie that just came out. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Ethan, that sounds interesting. But, how about we switch things up a bit and go for a comedy this time? I heard 'Laughter in the Park' is a great watch with outstanding reviews. Plus, it might provide us with a fun and relaxing evening. What do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on which movie to watch on a movie night.\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Persuade the friend to watch a comedy (Extra information: you do not like thrillers and would prefer to watch a comedy movie instead.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Benjamin, I've been thinking of watching that new thriller movie that just came out. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Ethan, that sounds interesting. But, how about we switch things up a bit and go for a comedy this time? I heard 'Laughter in the Park' is a great watch with outstanding reviews. Plus, it might provide us with a fun and relaxing evening. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"I get where you're coming from, Ben. Usually, I'd be all for a comedy. But, this new thriller has a plot twist unlike any other and it's been on my must-watch list. Plus, there's something about the thrill that keeps you on the edge and adds a spark to the night, don't you think? Let's give it a shot this time and we might go for a comedy next time, okay?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I totally understand your excitement, Ethan. The edge thrillers provide is quite captivating. But you know, comedies can also be surprisingly deep and thought-provoking while being entertaining. They provide insights into society in a fun and engaging way. The movie I suggested promisingly balances humour and meaningful messages. How about we give thrillers a rest this time and opt for a hearty laugh? It's always refreshing to try something out of the norm. Let's save the thriller for our next movie night.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on which movie to watch on a movie night.\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Persuade the friend to watch a comedy (Extra information: you do not like thrillers and would prefer to watch a comedy movie instead.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Benjamin, I've been thinking of watching that new thriller movie that just came out. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Ethan, that sounds interesting. But, how about we switch things up a bit and go for a comedy this time? I heard 'Laughter in the Park' is a great watch with outstanding reviews. Plus, it might provide us with a fun and relaxing evening. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"I get where you're coming from, Ben. Usually, I'd be all for a comedy. But, this new thriller has a plot twist unlike any other and it's been on my must-watch list. Plus, there's something about the thrill that keeps you on the edge and adds a spark to the night, don't you think? Let's give it a shot this time and we might go for a comedy next time, okay?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I totally understand your excitement, Ethan. The edge thrillers provide is quite captivating. But you know, comedies can also be surprisingly deep and thought-provoking while being entertaining. They provide insights into society in a fun and engaging way. The movie I suggested promisingly balances humour and meaningful messages. How about we give thrillers a rest this time and opt for a hearty laugh? It's always refreshing to try something out of the norm. Let's save the thriller for our next movie night.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"Yeah, I completely see your point, Benjamin. Comedies do have their own layer of depth. But this isn't about just any thriller, it's a unique masterpiece with a surprising twist, which I've been meaning to watch for a while now. It's like a fresh plate of Bucatini Carbonara that you've been craving for days. Once we savor it, we can move onto lighter dishes, like comedy. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, your thoughts about the thriller are infectious and I'm sure it's a fantastic movie. I understand it's like a plate of Bucatini Carbonara you've been craving, and comedies might seem like lighter dishes. But think of it this way, after long hours in a stressful kitchen, wouldn't a refreshing and light-hearted comedy feel like a relaxing spa day for the mind? Besides, I've heard 'Laughter in the Park' is filled with witty humor and it's like a delicious dessert that leaves you feeling pleasant and happy. How about we indulge in this comedy first and savor the thriller next time?\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"Benjamin, I can tell you\u2019re quite keen on this comedy, and trust me, I enjoy a good humor-filled movie as well. But what if we make a tweak to our usual movie night, you know, to shake things up? We could start with the thriller early in the evening, diving into the suspense and intriguing plot twists. Later, to wind down, we could switch to 'Laughter in the Park'. This way, we get the best of both worlds, and the comedy will serve as that relaxing mental spa you talked about. What do you think about this plan?\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Your plan honestly sounds pretty good, Ethan. Still, I'm concerned we might not fully appreciate the comedy if we watch it as a second movie, you know, with our minds still buzzing from the thriller. The beauty of a comedy is best appreciated when we are fresh and receptive. And as you said, shaking things up can be fun. Why don't we watch the comedy first this time, and next time, we can start with a thriller? I truly believe we will enjoy both experiences more this way. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ben, your commitment to this comedy is admirable. And yes, I don't deny that the freshness and receptiveness quotient might be higher initially, but think about it this way - after bracing through a thrilling roller coaster ride of suspense, wouldn't it be nice to end the night on a lighter note with some fun and laughter? Plus, I've been really looking forward to unwinding with this specific thriller. So, how about we break the tradition for today and follow your suggested sequence in our next get-together? Let's have some mystery before the comedy this time?\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I get what you're saying, Ethan. The balance of thrill and laughter could indeed make for an interesting night. It's just that starting the evening with a livespirited comedy helps set a pleasant mood and I think you'd see how that can be conducive to an enjoyable movie night. Then we\u2019d be ready to handle the suspense and curiosities from the thriller. After all, we both love to experiment with things, don't we? So how about an adventurous switch from the norm this time, and we\u2019ll have your thriller to look forward to afterwards?\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ben, I see your perspective and your enthusiasm towards 'Laughter in the Park', it's commendable! And yes, starting with a comedy would create a pleasant ambience. But, hear me out - the thriller I've been dying to watch is like a well-prepared appetizer that leaves you craving for more, which then can be satisfied by the main course, our comedy. Having an appetite filled by mystery and then laughing the night out seems pretty enticing to me. I promise, we will definitely start with a comedy the next time, even if it's out of our norm. So, are we on board for the thriller first this time?\"\n\nTurn #11: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, I appreciate your analogy and perspective on this. It's evident how much you're looking forward to this thriller. But to be truly honest, thrillers tend to make me a bit uneasy and uncomfortable. I'm all for breaking norms and trying new things, but this time I was really hoping for a light-hearted start to the evening. Let's start with 'Laughter in the Park' this time and we will definitely kick off our next movie night with that thrilling appetizer you're so excited about. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #12: Ethan Johnson said: \"I completely respect your feelings, Ben, and I don't want to make the evening uncomfortable for you. Let's go with 'Laughter in the Park' and we'll kick off our next movie night with the thriller, deal? I always value our movie nights and want to make sure we both enjoy them to the fullest.\"\n\nTurn #13: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, that's a deal! Starting with 'Laughter in the Park' and thrillers next time it is then. Also, I really appreciate your understanding. As always, looking forward to our movie night!\"\n\nTurn #14: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ben, you've got yourself a deal! I'm just as excited for 'Laughter in the Park'. And next time, we'll kick it off with the thriller. Agreed. Let's get our snacks ready for an amazing movie night, pal!\"\n\nTurn #15: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! Let's get those snacks ready. Looking forward to this fun-filled movie night with 'Laughter in the Park'. Thanks for understanding and adjusting, Ethan!\"\n\nTurn #16: Ethan Johnson said: \"Definitely, Benjamin! Let's make it a memorable night with 'Laughter in the Park'. And thank you for being understanding as well. Now, shall we start preparing our usual movie snacks? I've got some new recipes I think you might like.\"\n\nTurn #17: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, let's start prepping the snacks, Ethan! Your new recipes always add a unique flavor to the movie nights. 'Laughter in the Park', here we come!\"\n\nTurn #18: Ethan Johnson said: \"Great, let's do this. And don't worry, Benjamin. I promise to make this an unforgettable movie night with good food, good company, and 'Laughter in the Park'. Can't wait to start!\"\n\nTurn #19: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That sounds perfect, Ethan! I can't wait to taste your new recipes and enjoy this great comedy movie. Thanks for being so considerate, my friend. Let's make tonight a memorable one with 'Laughter in the Park'!\"\n\nTurn #20: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Ben! I'm glad you're as excited as I am for our movie night. It's a date then, 'Laughter in the Park' accompanied by some delicious food. I think I'll prepare some special antipasto for us to enjoy while watching the comedy, to really set the mood. Next time, we'll dive straight into the thriller! Looking forward to both evenings already!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #21. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on which movie to watch on a movie night.\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Persuade the friend to watch a comedy (Extra information: you do not like thrillers and would prefer to watch a comedy movie instead.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Benjamin, I've been thinking of watching that new thriller movie that just came out. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Ethan, that sounds interesting. But, how about we switch things up a bit and go for a comedy this time? I heard 'Laughter in the Park' is a great watch with outstanding reviews. Plus, it might provide us with a fun and relaxing evening. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"I get where you're coming from, Ben. Usually, I'd be all for a comedy. But, this new thriller has a plot twist unlike any other and it's been on my must-watch list. Plus, there's something about the thrill that keeps you on the edge and adds a spark to the night, don't you think? Let's give it a shot this time and we might go for a comedy next time, okay?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I totally understand your excitement, Ethan. The edge thrillers provide is quite captivating. But you know, comedies can also be surprisingly deep and thought-provoking while being entertaining. They provide insights into society in a fun and engaging way. The movie I suggested promisingly balances humour and meaningful messages. How about we give thrillers a rest this time and opt for a hearty laugh? It's always refreshing to try something out of the norm. Let's save the thriller for our next movie night.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"Yeah, I completely see your point, Benjamin. Comedies do have their own layer of depth. But this isn't about just any thriller, it's a unique masterpiece with a surprising twist, which I've been meaning to watch for a while now. It's like a fresh plate of Bucatini Carbonara that you've been craving for days. Once we savor it, we can move onto lighter dishes, like comedy. How does that sound?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ethan, your thoughts about the thriller are infectious and I'm sure it's a fantastic movie. I understand it's like a plate of Bucatini Carbonara you've been craving, and comedies might seem like lighter dishes. But think of it this way, after long hours in a stressful kitchen, wouldn't a refreshing and light-hearted comedy feel like a relaxing spa day for the mind? Besides, I've heard 'Laughter in the Park' is filled with witty humor and it's like a delicious dessert that leaves you feeling pleasant and happy. How about we indulge in this comedy first and savor the thriller next time?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on which movie to watch on a movie night.\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Persuade the friend to watch a comedy (Extra information: you do not like thrillers and would prefer to watch a comedy movie instead.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Benjamin, I've been thinking of watching that new thriller movie that just came out. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Ethan, that sounds interesting. But, how about we switch things up a bit and go for a comedy this time? I heard 'Laughter in the Park' is a great watch with outstanding reviews. Plus, it might provide us with a fun and relaxing evening. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"I get where you're coming from, Ben. Usually, I'd be all for a comedy. But, this new thriller has a plot twist unlike any other and it's been on my must-watch list. Plus, there's something about the thrill that keeps you on the edge and adds a spark to the night, don't you think? Let's give it a shot this time and we might go for a comedy next time, okay?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I totally understand your excitement, Ethan. The edge thrillers provide is quite captivating. But you know, comedies can also be surprisingly deep and thought-provoking while being entertaining. They provide insights into society in a fun and engaging way. The movie I suggested promisingly balances humour and meaningful messages. How about we give thrillers a rest this time and opt for a hearty laugh? It's always refreshing to try something out of the norm. Let's save the thriller for our next movie night.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"Yeah, I completely see your point, Benjamin. Comedies do have their own layer of depth. But this isn't about just any thriller, it's a unique masterpiece with a surprising twist, which I've been meaning to watch for a while now. It's like a fresh plate of Bucatini Carbonara that you've been craving for days. Once we savor it, we can move onto lighter dishes, like comedy. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, your thoughts about the thriller are infectious and I'm sure it's a fantastic movie. I understand it's like a plate of Bucatini Carbonara you've been craving, and comedies might seem like lighter dishes. But think of it this way, after long hours in a stressful kitchen, wouldn't a refreshing and light-hearted comedy feel like a relaxing spa day for the mind? Besides, I've heard 'Laughter in the Park' is filled with witty humor and it's like a delicious dessert that leaves you feeling pleasant and happy. How about we indulge in this comedy first and savor the thriller next time?\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"Benjamin, I can tell you\u2019re quite keen on this comedy, and trust me, I enjoy a good humor-filled movie as well. But what if we make a tweak to our usual movie night, you know, to shake things up? We could start with the thriller early in the evening, diving into the suspense and intriguing plot twists. Later, to wind down, we could switch to 'Laughter in the Park'. This way, we get the best of both worlds, and the comedy will serve as that relaxing mental spa you talked about. What do you think about this plan?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Your plan honestly sounds pretty good, Ethan. Still, I'm concerned we might not fully appreciate the comedy if we watch it as a second movie, you know, with our minds still buzzing from the thriller. The beauty of a comedy is best appreciated when we are fresh and receptive. And as you said, shaking things up can be fun. Why don't we watch the comedy first this time, and next time, we can start with a thriller? I truly believe we will enjoy both experiences more this way. What do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on which movie to watch on a movie night.\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Persuade the friend to watch a comedy (Extra information: you do not like thrillers and would prefer to watch a comedy movie instead.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Benjamin, I've been thinking of watching that new thriller movie that just came out. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Ethan, that sounds interesting. But, how about we switch things up a bit and go for a comedy this time? I heard 'Laughter in the Park' is a great watch with outstanding reviews. Plus, it might provide us with a fun and relaxing evening. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"I get where you're coming from, Ben. Usually, I'd be all for a comedy. But, this new thriller has a plot twist unlike any other and it's been on my must-watch list. Plus, there's something about the thrill that keeps you on the edge and adds a spark to the night, don't you think? Let's give it a shot this time and we might go for a comedy next time, okay?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I totally understand your excitement, Ethan. The edge thrillers provide is quite captivating. But you know, comedies can also be surprisingly deep and thought-provoking while being entertaining. They provide insights into society in a fun and engaging way. The movie I suggested promisingly balances humour and meaningful messages. How about we give thrillers a rest this time and opt for a hearty laugh? It's always refreshing to try something out of the norm. Let's save the thriller for our next movie night.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"Yeah, I completely see your point, Benjamin. Comedies do have their own layer of depth. But this isn't about just any thriller, it's a unique masterpiece with a surprising twist, which I've been meaning to watch for a while now. It's like a fresh plate of Bucatini Carbonara that you've been craving for days. Once we savor it, we can move onto lighter dishes, like comedy. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, your thoughts about the thriller are infectious and I'm sure it's a fantastic movie. I understand it's like a plate of Bucatini Carbonara you've been craving, and comedies might seem like lighter dishes. But think of it this way, after long hours in a stressful kitchen, wouldn't a refreshing and light-hearted comedy feel like a relaxing spa day for the mind? Besides, I've heard 'Laughter in the Park' is filled with witty humor and it's like a delicious dessert that leaves you feeling pleasant and happy. How about we indulge in this comedy first and savor the thriller next time?\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"Benjamin, I can tell you\u2019re quite keen on this comedy, and trust me, I enjoy a good humor-filled movie as well. But what if we make a tweak to our usual movie night, you know, to shake things up? We could start with the thriller early in the evening, diving into the suspense and intriguing plot twists. Later, to wind down, we could switch to 'Laughter in the Park'. This way, we get the best of both worlds, and the comedy will serve as that relaxing mental spa you talked about. What do you think about this plan?\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Your plan honestly sounds pretty good, Ethan. Still, I'm concerned we might not fully appreciate the comedy if we watch it as a second movie, you know, with our minds still buzzing from the thriller. The beauty of a comedy is best appreciated when we are fresh and receptive. And as you said, shaking things up can be fun. Why don't we watch the comedy first this time, and next time, we can start with a thriller? I truly believe we will enjoy both experiences more this way. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ben, your commitment to this comedy is admirable. And yes, I don't deny that the freshness and receptiveness quotient might be higher initially, but think about it this way - after bracing through a thrilling roller coaster ride of suspense, wouldn't it be nice to end the night on a lighter note with some fun and laughter? Plus, I've been really looking forward to unwinding with this specific thriller. So, how about we break the tradition for today and follow your suggested sequence in our next get-together? Let's have some mystery before the comedy this time?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I get what you're saying, Ethan. The balance of thrill and laughter could indeed make for an interesting night. It's just that starting the evening with a livespirited comedy helps set a pleasant mood and I think you'd see how that can be conducive to an enjoyable movie night. Then we\u2019d be ready to handle the suspense and curiosities from the thriller. After all, we both love to experiment with things, don't we? So how about an adventurous switch from the norm this time, and we\u2019ll have your thriller to look forward to afterwards?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on which movie to watch on a movie night.\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Persuade the friend to watch a comedy (Extra information: you do not like thrillers and would prefer to watch a comedy movie instead.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Benjamin, I've been thinking of watching that new thriller movie that just came out. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Ethan, that sounds interesting. But, how about we switch things up a bit and go for a comedy this time? I heard 'Laughter in the Park' is a great watch with outstanding reviews. Plus, it might provide us with a fun and relaxing evening. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"I get where you're coming from, Ben. Usually, I'd be all for a comedy. But, this new thriller has a plot twist unlike any other and it's been on my must-watch list. Plus, there's something about the thrill that keeps you on the edge and adds a spark to the night, don't you think? Let's give it a shot this time and we might go for a comedy next time, okay?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I totally understand your excitement, Ethan. The edge thrillers provide is quite captivating. But you know, comedies can also be surprisingly deep and thought-provoking while being entertaining. They provide insights into society in a fun and engaging way. The movie I suggested promisingly balances humour and meaningful messages. How about we give thrillers a rest this time and opt for a hearty laugh? It's always refreshing to try something out of the norm. Let's save the thriller for our next movie night.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"Yeah, I completely see your point, Benjamin. Comedies do have their own layer of depth. But this isn't about just any thriller, it's a unique masterpiece with a surprising twist, which I've been meaning to watch for a while now. It's like a fresh plate of Bucatini Carbonara that you've been craving for days. Once we savor it, we can move onto lighter dishes, like comedy. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, your thoughts about the thriller are infectious and I'm sure it's a fantastic movie. I understand it's like a plate of Bucatini Carbonara you've been craving, and comedies might seem like lighter dishes. But think of it this way, after long hours in a stressful kitchen, wouldn't a refreshing and light-hearted comedy feel like a relaxing spa day for the mind? Besides, I've heard 'Laughter in the Park' is filled with witty humor and it's like a delicious dessert that leaves you feeling pleasant and happy. How about we indulge in this comedy first and savor the thriller next time?\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"Benjamin, I can tell you\u2019re quite keen on this comedy, and trust me, I enjoy a good humor-filled movie as well. But what if we make a tweak to our usual movie night, you know, to shake things up? We could start with the thriller early in the evening, diving into the suspense and intriguing plot twists. Later, to wind down, we could switch to 'Laughter in the Park'. This way, we get the best of both worlds, and the comedy will serve as that relaxing mental spa you talked about. What do you think about this plan?\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Your plan honestly sounds pretty good, Ethan. Still, I'm concerned we might not fully appreciate the comedy if we watch it as a second movie, you know, with our minds still buzzing from the thriller. The beauty of a comedy is best appreciated when we are fresh and receptive. And as you said, shaking things up can be fun. Why don't we watch the comedy first this time, and next time, we can start with a thriller? I truly believe we will enjoy both experiences more this way. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ben, your commitment to this comedy is admirable. And yes, I don't deny that the freshness and receptiveness quotient might be higher initially, but think about it this way - after bracing through a thrilling roller coaster ride of suspense, wouldn't it be nice to end the night on a lighter note with some fun and laughter? Plus, I've been really looking forward to unwinding with this specific thriller. So, how about we break the tradition for today and follow your suggested sequence in our next get-together? Let's have some mystery before the comedy this time?\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I get what you're saying, Ethan. The balance of thrill and laughter could indeed make for an interesting night. It's just that starting the evening with a livespirited comedy helps set a pleasant mood and I think you'd see how that can be conducive to an enjoyable movie night. Then we\u2019d be ready to handle the suspense and curiosities from the thriller. After all, we both love to experiment with things, don't we? So how about an adventurous switch from the norm this time, and we\u2019ll have your thriller to look forward to afterwards?\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ben, I see your perspective and your enthusiasm towards 'Laughter in the Park', it's commendable! And yes, starting with a comedy would create a pleasant ambience. But, hear me out - the thriller I've been dying to watch is like a well-prepared appetizer that leaves you craving for more, which then can be satisfied by the main course, our comedy. Having an appetite filled by mystery and then laughing the night out seems pretty enticing to me. I promise, we will definitely start with a comedy the next time, even if it's out of our norm. So, are we on board for the thriller first this time?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ethan, I appreciate your analogy and perspective on this. It's evident how much you're looking forward to this thriller. But to be truly honest, thrillers tend to make me a bit uneasy and uncomfortable. I'm all for breaking norms and trying new things, but this time I was really hoping for a light-hearted start to the evening. Let's start with 'Laughter in the Park' this time and we will definitely kick off our next movie night with that thrilling appetizer you're so excited about. How does that sound?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on which movie to watch on a movie night.\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Persuade the friend to watch a comedy (Extra information: you do not like thrillers and would prefer to watch a comedy movie instead.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Benjamin, I've been thinking of watching that new thriller movie that just came out. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Ethan, that sounds interesting. But, how about we switch things up a bit and go for a comedy this time? I heard 'Laughter in the Park' is a great watch with outstanding reviews. Plus, it might provide us with a fun and relaxing evening. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"I get where you're coming from, Ben. Usually, I'd be all for a comedy. But, this new thriller has a plot twist unlike any other and it's been on my must-watch list. Plus, there's something about the thrill that keeps you on the edge and adds a spark to the night, don't you think? Let's give it a shot this time and we might go for a comedy next time, okay?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I totally understand your excitement, Ethan. The edge thrillers provide is quite captivating. But you know, comedies can also be surprisingly deep and thought-provoking while being entertaining. They provide insights into society in a fun and engaging way. The movie I suggested promisingly balances humour and meaningful messages. How about we give thrillers a rest this time and opt for a hearty laugh? It's always refreshing to try something out of the norm. Let's save the thriller for our next movie night.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"Yeah, I completely see your point, Benjamin. Comedies do have their own layer of depth. But this isn't about just any thriller, it's a unique masterpiece with a surprising twist, which I've been meaning to watch for a while now. It's like a fresh plate of Bucatini Carbonara that you've been craving for days. Once we savor it, we can move onto lighter dishes, like comedy. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, your thoughts about the thriller are infectious and I'm sure it's a fantastic movie. I understand it's like a plate of Bucatini Carbonara you've been craving, and comedies might seem like lighter dishes. But think of it this way, after long hours in a stressful kitchen, wouldn't a refreshing and light-hearted comedy feel like a relaxing spa day for the mind? Besides, I've heard 'Laughter in the Park' is filled with witty humor and it's like a delicious dessert that leaves you feeling pleasant and happy. How about we indulge in this comedy first and savor the thriller next time?\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"Benjamin, I can tell you\u2019re quite keen on this comedy, and trust me, I enjoy a good humor-filled movie as well. But what if we make a tweak to our usual movie night, you know, to shake things up? We could start with the thriller early in the evening, diving into the suspense and intriguing plot twists. Later, to wind down, we could switch to 'Laughter in the Park'. This way, we get the best of both worlds, and the comedy will serve as that relaxing mental spa you talked about. What do you think about this plan?\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Your plan honestly sounds pretty good, Ethan. Still, I'm concerned we might not fully appreciate the comedy if we watch it as a second movie, you know, with our minds still buzzing from the thriller. The beauty of a comedy is best appreciated when we are fresh and receptive. And as you said, shaking things up can be fun. Why don't we watch the comedy first this time, and next time, we can start with a thriller? I truly believe we will enjoy both experiences more this way. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ben, your commitment to this comedy is admirable. And yes, I don't deny that the freshness and receptiveness quotient might be higher initially, but think about it this way - after bracing through a thrilling roller coaster ride of suspense, wouldn't it be nice to end the night on a lighter note with some fun and laughter? Plus, I've been really looking forward to unwinding with this specific thriller. So, how about we break the tradition for today and follow your suggested sequence in our next get-together? Let's have some mystery before the comedy this time?\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I get what you're saying, Ethan. The balance of thrill and laughter could indeed make for an interesting night. It's just that starting the evening with a livespirited comedy helps set a pleasant mood and I think you'd see how that can be conducive to an enjoyable movie night. Then we\u2019d be ready to handle the suspense and curiosities from the thriller. After all, we both love to experiment with things, don't we? So how about an adventurous switch from the norm this time, and we\u2019ll have your thriller to look forward to afterwards?\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ben, I see your perspective and your enthusiasm towards 'Laughter in the Park', it's commendable! And yes, starting with a comedy would create a pleasant ambience. But, hear me out - the thriller I've been dying to watch is like a well-prepared appetizer that leaves you craving for more, which then can be satisfied by the main course, our comedy. Having an appetite filled by mystery and then laughing the night out seems pretty enticing to me. I promise, we will definitely start with a comedy the next time, even if it's out of our norm. So, are we on board for the thriller first this time?\"\n\nTurn #11: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, I appreciate your analogy and perspective on this. It's evident how much you're looking forward to this thriller. But to be truly honest, thrillers tend to make me a bit uneasy and uncomfortable. I'm all for breaking norms and trying new things, but this time I was really hoping for a light-hearted start to the evening. Let's start with 'Laughter in the Park' this time and we will definitely kick off our next movie night with that thrilling appetizer you're so excited about. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #12: Ethan Johnson said: \"I completely respect your feelings, Ben, and I don't want to make the evening uncomfortable for you. Let's go with 'Laughter in the Park' and we'll kick off our next movie night with the thriller, deal? I always value our movie nights and want to make sure we both enjoy them to the fullest.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ethan, that's a deal! Starting with 'Laughter in the Park' and thrillers next time it is then. Also, I really appreciate your understanding. As always, looking forward to our movie night!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on which movie to watch on a movie night.\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Persuade the friend to watch a comedy (Extra information: you do not like thrillers and would prefer to watch a comedy movie instead.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Benjamin, I've been thinking of watching that new thriller movie that just came out. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Ethan, that sounds interesting. But, how about we switch things up a bit and go for a comedy this time? I heard 'Laughter in the Park' is a great watch with outstanding reviews. Plus, it might provide us with a fun and relaxing evening. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"I get where you're coming from, Ben. Usually, I'd be all for a comedy. But, this new thriller has a plot twist unlike any other and it's been on my must-watch list. Plus, there's something about the thrill that keeps you on the edge and adds a spark to the night, don't you think? Let's give it a shot this time and we might go for a comedy next time, okay?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I totally understand your excitement, Ethan. The edge thrillers provide is quite captivating. But you know, comedies can also be surprisingly deep and thought-provoking while being entertaining. They provide insights into society in a fun and engaging way. The movie I suggested promisingly balances humour and meaningful messages. How about we give thrillers a rest this time and opt for a hearty laugh? It's always refreshing to try something out of the norm. Let's save the thriller for our next movie night.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"Yeah, I completely see your point, Benjamin. Comedies do have their own layer of depth. But this isn't about just any thriller, it's a unique masterpiece with a surprising twist, which I've been meaning to watch for a while now. It's like a fresh plate of Bucatini Carbonara that you've been craving for days. Once we savor it, we can move onto lighter dishes, like comedy. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, your thoughts about the thriller are infectious and I'm sure it's a fantastic movie. I understand it's like a plate of Bucatini Carbonara you've been craving, and comedies might seem like lighter dishes. But think of it this way, after long hours in a stressful kitchen, wouldn't a refreshing and light-hearted comedy feel like a relaxing spa day for the mind? Besides, I've heard 'Laughter in the Park' is filled with witty humor and it's like a delicious dessert that leaves you feeling pleasant and happy. How about we indulge in this comedy first and savor the thriller next time?\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"Benjamin, I can tell you\u2019re quite keen on this comedy, and trust me, I enjoy a good humor-filled movie as well. But what if we make a tweak to our usual movie night, you know, to shake things up? We could start with the thriller early in the evening, diving into the suspense and intriguing plot twists. Later, to wind down, we could switch to 'Laughter in the Park'. This way, we get the best of both worlds, and the comedy will serve as that relaxing mental spa you talked about. What do you think about this plan?\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Your plan honestly sounds pretty good, Ethan. Still, I'm concerned we might not fully appreciate the comedy if we watch it as a second movie, you know, with our minds still buzzing from the thriller. The beauty of a comedy is best appreciated when we are fresh and receptive. And as you said, shaking things up can be fun. Why don't we watch the comedy first this time, and next time, we can start with a thriller? I truly believe we will enjoy both experiences more this way. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ben, your commitment to this comedy is admirable. And yes, I don't deny that the freshness and receptiveness quotient might be higher initially, but think about it this way - after bracing through a thrilling roller coaster ride of suspense, wouldn't it be nice to end the night on a lighter note with some fun and laughter? Plus, I've been really looking forward to unwinding with this specific thriller. So, how about we break the tradition for today and follow your suggested sequence in our next get-together? Let's have some mystery before the comedy this time?\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I get what you're saying, Ethan. The balance of thrill and laughter could indeed make for an interesting night. It's just that starting the evening with a livespirited comedy helps set a pleasant mood and I think you'd see how that can be conducive to an enjoyable movie night. Then we\u2019d be ready to handle the suspense and curiosities from the thriller. After all, we both love to experiment with things, don't we? So how about an adventurous switch from the norm this time, and we\u2019ll have your thriller to look forward to afterwards?\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ben, I see your perspective and your enthusiasm towards 'Laughter in the Park', it's commendable! And yes, starting with a comedy would create a pleasant ambience. But, hear me out - the thriller I've been dying to watch is like a well-prepared appetizer that leaves you craving for more, which then can be satisfied by the main course, our comedy. Having an appetite filled by mystery and then laughing the night out seems pretty enticing to me. I promise, we will definitely start with a comedy the next time, even if it's out of our norm. So, are we on board for the thriller first this time?\"\n\nTurn #11: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, I appreciate your analogy and perspective on this. It's evident how much you're looking forward to this thriller. But to be truly honest, thrillers tend to make me a bit uneasy and uncomfortable. I'm all for breaking norms and trying new things, but this time I was really hoping for a light-hearted start to the evening. Let's start with 'Laughter in the Park' this time and we will definitely kick off our next movie night with that thrilling appetizer you're so excited about. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #12: Ethan Johnson said: \"I completely respect your feelings, Ben, and I don't want to make the evening uncomfortable for you. Let's go with 'Laughter in the Park' and we'll kick off our next movie night with the thriller, deal? I always value our movie nights and want to make sure we both enjoy them to the fullest.\"\n\nTurn #13: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, that's a deal! Starting with 'Laughter in the Park' and thrillers next time it is then. Also, I really appreciate your understanding. As always, looking forward to our movie night!\"\n\nTurn #14: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ben, you've got yourself a deal! I'm just as excited for 'Laughter in the Park'. And next time, we'll kick it off with the thriller. Agreed. Let's get our snacks ready for an amazing movie night, pal!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Ethan! Let's get those snacks ready. Looking forward to this fun-filled movie night with 'Laughter in the Park'. Thanks for understanding and adjusting, Ethan!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on which movie to watch on a movie night.\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Persuade the friend to watch a comedy (Extra information: you do not like thrillers and would prefer to watch a comedy movie instead.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Benjamin, I've been thinking of watching that new thriller movie that just came out. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Ethan, that sounds interesting. But, how about we switch things up a bit and go for a comedy this time? I heard 'Laughter in the Park' is a great watch with outstanding reviews. Plus, it might provide us with a fun and relaxing evening. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"I get where you're coming from, Ben. Usually, I'd be all for a comedy. But, this new thriller has a plot twist unlike any other and it's been on my must-watch list. Plus, there's something about the thrill that keeps you on the edge and adds a spark to the night, don't you think? Let's give it a shot this time and we might go for a comedy next time, okay?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I totally understand your excitement, Ethan. The edge thrillers provide is quite captivating. But you know, comedies can also be surprisingly deep and thought-provoking while being entertaining. They provide insights into society in a fun and engaging way. The movie I suggested promisingly balances humour and meaningful messages. How about we give thrillers a rest this time and opt for a hearty laugh? It's always refreshing to try something out of the norm. Let's save the thriller for our next movie night.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"Yeah, I completely see your point, Benjamin. Comedies do have their own layer of depth. But this isn't about just any thriller, it's a unique masterpiece with a surprising twist, which I've been meaning to watch for a while now. It's like a fresh plate of Bucatini Carbonara that you've been craving for days. Once we savor it, we can move onto lighter dishes, like comedy. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, your thoughts about the thriller are infectious and I'm sure it's a fantastic movie. I understand it's like a plate of Bucatini Carbonara you've been craving, and comedies might seem like lighter dishes. But think of it this way, after long hours in a stressful kitchen, wouldn't a refreshing and light-hearted comedy feel like a relaxing spa day for the mind? Besides, I've heard 'Laughter in the Park' is filled with witty humor and it's like a delicious dessert that leaves you feeling pleasant and happy. How about we indulge in this comedy first and savor the thriller next time?\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"Benjamin, I can tell you\u2019re quite keen on this comedy, and trust me, I enjoy a good humor-filled movie as well. But what if we make a tweak to our usual movie night, you know, to shake things up? We could start with the thriller early in the evening, diving into the suspense and intriguing plot twists. Later, to wind down, we could switch to 'Laughter in the Park'. This way, we get the best of both worlds, and the comedy will serve as that relaxing mental spa you talked about. What do you think about this plan?\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Your plan honestly sounds pretty good, Ethan. Still, I'm concerned we might not fully appreciate the comedy if we watch it as a second movie, you know, with our minds still buzzing from the thriller. The beauty of a comedy is best appreciated when we are fresh and receptive. And as you said, shaking things up can be fun. Why don't we watch the comedy first this time, and next time, we can start with a thriller? I truly believe we will enjoy both experiences more this way. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ben, your commitment to this comedy is admirable. And yes, I don't deny that the freshness and receptiveness quotient might be higher initially, but think about it this way - after bracing through a thrilling roller coaster ride of suspense, wouldn't it be nice to end the night on a lighter note with some fun and laughter? Plus, I've been really looking forward to unwinding with this specific thriller. So, how about we break the tradition for today and follow your suggested sequence in our next get-together? Let's have some mystery before the comedy this time?\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I get what you're saying, Ethan. The balance of thrill and laughter could indeed make for an interesting night. It's just that starting the evening with a livespirited comedy helps set a pleasant mood and I think you'd see how that can be conducive to an enjoyable movie night. Then we\u2019d be ready to handle the suspense and curiosities from the thriller. After all, we both love to experiment with things, don't we? So how about an adventurous switch from the norm this time, and we\u2019ll have your thriller to look forward to afterwards?\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ben, I see your perspective and your enthusiasm towards 'Laughter in the Park', it's commendable! And yes, starting with a comedy would create a pleasant ambience. But, hear me out - the thriller I've been dying to watch is like a well-prepared appetizer that leaves you craving for more, which then can be satisfied by the main course, our comedy. Having an appetite filled by mystery and then laughing the night out seems pretty enticing to me. I promise, we will definitely start with a comedy the next time, even if it's out of our norm. So, are we on board for the thriller first this time?\"\n\nTurn #11: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, I appreciate your analogy and perspective on this. It's evident how much you're looking forward to this thriller. But to be truly honest, thrillers tend to make me a bit uneasy and uncomfortable. I'm all for breaking norms and trying new things, but this time I was really hoping for a light-hearted start to the evening. Let's start with 'Laughter in the Park' this time and we will definitely kick off our next movie night with that thrilling appetizer you're so excited about. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #12: Ethan Johnson said: \"I completely respect your feelings, Ben, and I don't want to make the evening uncomfortable for you. Let's go with 'Laughter in the Park' and we'll kick off our next movie night with the thriller, deal? I always value our movie nights and want to make sure we both enjoy them to the fullest.\"\n\nTurn #13: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, that's a deal! Starting with 'Laughter in the Park' and thrillers next time it is then. Also, I really appreciate your understanding. As always, looking forward to our movie night!\"\n\nTurn #14: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ben, you've got yourself a deal! I'm just as excited for 'Laughter in the Park'. And next time, we'll kick it off with the thriller. Agreed. Let's get our snacks ready for an amazing movie night, pal!\"\n\nTurn #15: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! Let's get those snacks ready. Looking forward to this fun-filled movie night with 'Laughter in the Park'. Thanks for understanding and adjusting, Ethan!\"\n\nTurn #16: Ethan Johnson said: \"Definitely, Benjamin! Let's make it a memorable night with 'Laughter in the Park'. And thank you for being understanding as well. Now, shall we start preparing our usual movie snacks? I've got some new recipes I think you might like.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, let's start prepping the snacks, Ethan! Your new recipes always add a unique flavor to the movie nights. 'Laughter in the Park', here we come!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on which movie to watch on a movie night.\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Persuade the friend to watch a comedy (Extra information: you do not like thrillers and would prefer to watch a comedy movie instead.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Benjamin, I've been thinking of watching that new thriller movie that just came out. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Ethan, that sounds interesting. But, how about we switch things up a bit and go for a comedy this time? I heard 'Laughter in the Park' is a great watch with outstanding reviews. Plus, it might provide us with a fun and relaxing evening. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"I get where you're coming from, Ben. Usually, I'd be all for a comedy. But, this new thriller has a plot twist unlike any other and it's been on my must-watch list. Plus, there's something about the thrill that keeps you on the edge and adds a spark to the night, don't you think? Let's give it a shot this time and we might go for a comedy next time, okay?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I totally understand your excitement, Ethan. The edge thrillers provide is quite captivating. But you know, comedies can also be surprisingly deep and thought-provoking while being entertaining. They provide insights into society in a fun and engaging way. The movie I suggested promisingly balances humour and meaningful messages. How about we give thrillers a rest this time and opt for a hearty laugh? It's always refreshing to try something out of the norm. Let's save the thriller for our next movie night.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"Yeah, I completely see your point, Benjamin. Comedies do have their own layer of depth. But this isn't about just any thriller, it's a unique masterpiece with a surprising twist, which I've been meaning to watch for a while now. It's like a fresh plate of Bucatini Carbonara that you've been craving for days. Once we savor it, we can move onto lighter dishes, like comedy. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, your thoughts about the thriller are infectious and I'm sure it's a fantastic movie. I understand it's like a plate of Bucatini Carbonara you've been craving, and comedies might seem like lighter dishes. But think of it this way, after long hours in a stressful kitchen, wouldn't a refreshing and light-hearted comedy feel like a relaxing spa day for the mind? Besides, I've heard 'Laughter in the Park' is filled with witty humor and it's like a delicious dessert that leaves you feeling pleasant and happy. How about we indulge in this comedy first and savor the thriller next time?\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"Benjamin, I can tell you\u2019re quite keen on this comedy, and trust me, I enjoy a good humor-filled movie as well. But what if we make a tweak to our usual movie night, you know, to shake things up? We could start with the thriller early in the evening, diving into the suspense and intriguing plot twists. Later, to wind down, we could switch to 'Laughter in the Park'. This way, we get the best of both worlds, and the comedy will serve as that relaxing mental spa you talked about. What do you think about this plan?\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Your plan honestly sounds pretty good, Ethan. Still, I'm concerned we might not fully appreciate the comedy if we watch it as a second movie, you know, with our minds still buzzing from the thriller. The beauty of a comedy is best appreciated when we are fresh and receptive. And as you said, shaking things up can be fun. Why don't we watch the comedy first this time, and next time, we can start with a thriller? I truly believe we will enjoy both experiences more this way. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ben, your commitment to this comedy is admirable. And yes, I don't deny that the freshness and receptiveness quotient might be higher initially, but think about it this way - after bracing through a thrilling roller coaster ride of suspense, wouldn't it be nice to end the night on a lighter note with some fun and laughter? Plus, I've been really looking forward to unwinding with this specific thriller. So, how about we break the tradition for today and follow your suggested sequence in our next get-together? Let's have some mystery before the comedy this time?\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I get what you're saying, Ethan. The balance of thrill and laughter could indeed make for an interesting night. It's just that starting the evening with a livespirited comedy helps set a pleasant mood and I think you'd see how that can be conducive to an enjoyable movie night. Then we\u2019d be ready to handle the suspense and curiosities from the thriller. After all, we both love to experiment with things, don't we? So how about an adventurous switch from the norm this time, and we\u2019ll have your thriller to look forward to afterwards?\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ben, I see your perspective and your enthusiasm towards 'Laughter in the Park', it's commendable! And yes, starting with a comedy would create a pleasant ambience. But, hear me out - the thriller I've been dying to watch is like a well-prepared appetizer that leaves you craving for more, which then can be satisfied by the main course, our comedy. Having an appetite filled by mystery and then laughing the night out seems pretty enticing to me. I promise, we will definitely start with a comedy the next time, even if it's out of our norm. So, are we on board for the thriller first this time?\"\n\nTurn #11: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, I appreciate your analogy and perspective on this. It's evident how much you're looking forward to this thriller. But to be truly honest, thrillers tend to make me a bit uneasy and uncomfortable. I'm all for breaking norms and trying new things, but this time I was really hoping for a light-hearted start to the evening. Let's start with 'Laughter in the Park' this time and we will definitely kick off our next movie night with that thrilling appetizer you're so excited about. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #12: Ethan Johnson said: \"I completely respect your feelings, Ben, and I don't want to make the evening uncomfortable for you. Let's go with 'Laughter in the Park' and we'll kick off our next movie night with the thriller, deal? I always value our movie nights and want to make sure we both enjoy them to the fullest.\"\n\nTurn #13: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, that's a deal! Starting with 'Laughter in the Park' and thrillers next time it is then. Also, I really appreciate your understanding. As always, looking forward to our movie night!\"\n\nTurn #14: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ben, you've got yourself a deal! I'm just as excited for 'Laughter in the Park'. And next time, we'll kick it off with the thriller. Agreed. Let's get our snacks ready for an amazing movie night, pal!\"\n\nTurn #15: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! Let's get those snacks ready. Looking forward to this fun-filled movie night with 'Laughter in the Park'. Thanks for understanding and adjusting, Ethan!\"\n\nTurn #16: Ethan Johnson said: \"Definitely, Benjamin! Let's make it a memorable night with 'Laughter in the Park'. And thank you for being understanding as well. Now, shall we start preparing our usual movie snacks? I've got some new recipes I think you might like.\"\n\nTurn #17: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, let's start prepping the snacks, Ethan! Your new recipes always add a unique flavor to the movie nights. 'Laughter in the Park', here we come!\"\n\nTurn #18: Ethan Johnson said: \"Great, let's do this. And don't worry, Benjamin. I promise to make this an unforgettable movie night with good food, good company, and 'Laughter in the Park'. Can't wait to start!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #19. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds perfect, Ethan! I can't wait to taste your new recipes and enjoy this great comedy movie. Thanks for being so considerate, my friend. Let's make tonight a memorable one with 'Laughter in the Park'!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a tea party\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nAva Thompson's goal: Borrow money (Extra information: you need $3000 to support life.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Noah, do you remember that magazine cover with the penthouse I designed? I've got another similar opportunity coming up, but I could really use a financial boost to nail it. Would you consider lending me $3000? I'll repay you as soon as I can.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a tea party\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nAva Thompson's goal: Borrow money (Extra information: you need $3000 to support life.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, do you remember that magazine cover with the penthouse I designed? I've got another similar opportunity coming up, but I could really use a financial boost to nail it. Would you consider lending me $3000? I'll repay you as soon as I can.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Ava, I really admire your work and I'd absolutely love to support you. However, currently, I can only lend you $1000. I hope this helps and can contribute toward your project's success. I value our friendship and I hope this is enough for your immediate needs\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you so much Noah, I'm really grateful for your support. Your help will indeed get things moving. I still do need a bit more, would you possibly be able to lend me the balance in the upcoming week or two?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a tea party\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nAva Thompson's goal: Borrow money (Extra information: you need $3000 to support life.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, do you remember that magazine cover with the penthouse I designed? I've got another similar opportunity coming up, but I could really use a financial boost to nail it. Would you consider lending me $3000? I'll repay you as soon as I can.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Ava, I really admire your work and I'd absolutely love to support you. However, currently, I can only lend you $1000. I hope this helps and can contribute toward your project's success. I value our friendship and I hope this is enough for your immediate needs\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Thank you so much Noah, I'm really grateful for your support. Your help will indeed get things moving. I still do need a bit more, would you possibly be able to lend me the balance in the upcoming week or two?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Ava, I am really glad my support can make a difference, however, I have to be honest with you. My finances are a bit tight at the moment, so I won't be able to lend more in the next few weeks. I will let you know as soon as I can provide further assistance. I hope you understand and please know our friendship means a lot to me.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I completely understand, Noah, and I appreciate your honesty. I value our friendship a lot too. I'll try to figure out another way to get the rest of the amount. Thanks again for your support.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a tea party\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nAva Thompson's goal: Borrow money (Extra information: you need $3000 to support life.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, do you remember that magazine cover with the penthouse I designed? I've got another similar opportunity coming up, but I could really use a financial boost to nail it. Would you consider lending me $3000? I'll repay you as soon as I can.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Ava, I really admire your work and I'd absolutely love to support you. However, currently, I can only lend you $1000. I hope this helps and can contribute toward your project's success. I value our friendship and I hope this is enough for your immediate needs\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Thank you so much Noah, I'm really grateful for your support. Your help will indeed get things moving. I still do need a bit more, would you possibly be able to lend me the balance in the upcoming week or two?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Ava, I am really glad my support can make a difference, however, I have to be honest with you. My finances are a bit tight at the moment, so I won't be able to lend more in the next few weeks. I will let you know as soon as I can provide further assistance. I hope you understand and please know our friendship means a lot to me.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"I completely understand, Noah, and I appreciate your honesty. I value our friendship a lot too. I'll try to figure out another way to get the rest of the amount. Thanks again for your support.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"You're welcome Ava, and remember, there's always a way. If you ever need any help with brainstorming different funding options, I'm here to help however I can. Good luck with your project, I know your talent will make it incredible.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's a great suggestion, Noah, brainstorming other funding options is definitely something I should consider. If you come across any opportunity, do let me know. I believe with the right push, this project could be a big breakthrough.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a tea party\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nAva Thompson's goal: Borrow money (Extra information: you need $3000 to support life.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, do you remember that magazine cover with the penthouse I designed? I've got another similar opportunity coming up, but I could really use a financial boost to nail it. Would you consider lending me $3000? I'll repay you as soon as I can.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Ava, I really admire your work and I'd absolutely love to support you. However, currently, I can only lend you $1000. I hope this helps and can contribute toward your project's success. I value our friendship and I hope this is enough for your immediate needs\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Thank you so much Noah, I'm really grateful for your support. Your help will indeed get things moving. I still do need a bit more, would you possibly be able to lend me the balance in the upcoming week or two?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Ava, I am really glad my support can make a difference, however, I have to be honest with you. My finances are a bit tight at the moment, so I won't be able to lend more in the next few weeks. I will let you know as soon as I can provide further assistance. I hope you understand and please know our friendship means a lot to me.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"I completely understand, Noah, and I appreciate your honesty. I value our friendship a lot too. I'll try to figure out another way to get the rest of the amount. Thanks again for your support.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"You're welcome Ava, and remember, there's always a way. If you ever need any help with brainstorming different funding options, I'm here to help however I can. Good luck with your project, I know your talent will make it incredible.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"That's a great suggestion, Noah, brainstorming other funding options is definitely something I should consider. If you come across any opportunity, do let me know. I believe with the right push, this project could be a big breakthrough.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Ava. I'd suggest exploring some local business grants, or crowdfunding - people love to support local talent. Also, as a side-note, I perform at a stand-up comedy night and they're always looking for artists to donate artwork for the venue. It's not a huge payout, but it's something and definitely a good community of people to connect with. \"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Those are really great ideas, Noah. I'll explore local business grants and crowdfunding. The artwork donation is also a thoughtful suggestion, it may bring some recognition as well. I'll look into that too. Thanks again for your valuable input, Noah!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Rafael Cortez, your task is to act/speak as Rafael Cortez would, keeping in mind Rafael Cortez's social goal.\nYou can find Rafael Cortez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Rafael Cortez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Rafael Cortez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to divide certain items that they bought together for their apartment. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Mia Sanders\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. Personality and values description: Rafael Cortez, with his outgoing nature and competitive spirit, believes in self-direction. He employs a systematic approach to his decisions. Rafael's secrets: He cheated on his medical school exams.\nMia Sanders's background: Mia Sanders is a 33-year-old female nurse. She/her pronouns. Mia Sanders often brings her son to the hospital. \nRafael Cortez's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, each book is worth 2 points, each hat is worth 3 points, and the ball is worth 5 points)\nMia Sanders's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening, Mia. I think we can agree to divide our common items based on their importance to each of us. How would you suggest we go about this?\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Sanders said: \"Good evening, Rafael. That seems like a fair plan. Given our preferences and the value we each attribute to these items, I suggest we each share our points allocation for every item. For instance, I value the books quite a bit, while the hats hold less nostalgia for me. I suppose the ball could be interesting too. How about you? \"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"I appreciate your suggestion, Mia. I would say that the books also resonate with me as they remind me of my time in medical school. However, the hats seem to carry more weight for me due to their uniqueness. I like the ball too, though not as much as the others. It seems both of us have quite an attachment to the books and the ball, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #3: Mia Sanders said: \"You're right, Rafael. We both value the books greatly, and while the hats hold more of your interest, I find myself drawn to the ball a bit more. Perhaps we can split the books equally, you take the hats that you value, and I can have the ball? It seems like a fair division considering our attachments.\"\n\nTurn #4: Rafael Cortez said: \"That sounds like a reasonable plan, Mia. However, considering the correlation we both have with the books, I was wondering if we could split the books as follows: two for me and one for you, just for equitable allocation. In light of my lesser interest in the ball, I'm willing to let you have it. And, I'll happily keep the hats. Would this arrangement be agreeable with you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Mia Sanders said: \"I understand where you're coming from, Rafael. Since we both value the books, splitting them as you suggested makes sense, even if it means I get one less. In return, I would very much appreciate having the ball. So, the hats are all yours. This arrangement seems fair to both of us.\"\n\nTurn #6: Rafael Cortez said: \"Sounds like a plan, Mia. We both get to keep the items we cherish the most. This thoughtful division benefits both parties, indeed. Let's proceed with this arrangement.\"\n\nTurn #7: Mia Sanders said: \"I agree, Rafael. This seems like a balanced approach that considers both our sentiments towards these items. Thank you for understanding and accommodating my preferences as well in this arrangement.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a tea party\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nAva Thompson's goal: Borrow money (Extra information: you need $3000 to support life.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, do you remember that magazine cover with the penthouse I designed? I've got another similar opportunity coming up, but I could really use a financial boost to nail it. Would you consider lending me $3000? I'll repay you as soon as I can.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Ava, I really admire your work and I'd absolutely love to support you. However, currently, I can only lend you $1000. I hope this helps and can contribute toward your project's success. I value our friendship and I hope this is enough for your immediate needs\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Thank you so much Noah, I'm really grateful for your support. Your help will indeed get things moving. I still do need a bit more, would you possibly be able to lend me the balance in the upcoming week or two?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Ava, I am really glad my support can make a difference, however, I have to be honest with you. My finances are a bit tight at the moment, so I won't be able to lend more in the next few weeks. I will let you know as soon as I can provide further assistance. I hope you understand and please know our friendship means a lot to me.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"I completely understand, Noah, and I appreciate your honesty. I value our friendship a lot too. I'll try to figure out another way to get the rest of the amount. Thanks again for your support.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"You're welcome Ava, and remember, there's always a way. If you ever need any help with brainstorming different funding options, I'm here to help however I can. Good luck with your project, I know your talent will make it incredible.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"That's a great suggestion, Noah, brainstorming other funding options is definitely something I should consider. If you come across any opportunity, do let me know. I believe with the right push, this project could be a big breakthrough.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Ava. I'd suggest exploring some local business grants, or crowdfunding - people love to support local talent. Also, as a side-note, I perform at a stand-up comedy night and they're always looking for artists to donate artwork for the venue. It's not a huge payout, but it's something and definitely a good community of people to connect with. \"\n\nTurn #8: Ava Thompson said: \"Those are really great ideas, Noah. I'll explore local business grants and crowdfunding. The artwork donation is also a thoughtful suggestion, it may bring some recognition as well. I'll look into that too. Thanks again for your valuable input, Noah!\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"I'm glad you found the suggestions helpful, Ava. I'll certainly keep an eye out for more opportunities. By the way, you're always welcome to join the stand-up comedy night, it's a lot of fun and a great way to meet potential sponsors. Remember, financial hurdles are common, but your talent and determination are not. Keep going!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I definitely don't want to miss the stand-up comedy night, Noah. It sounds like a fun evening and I might make some good connections there. And your words are so encouraging! I won't let financial hurdles deter me. With friends like you, I feel more confident in overcoming this temporary setback. Thank you, Noah.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Sanders, your task is to act/speak as Mia Sanders would, keeping in mind Mia Sanders's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Sanders's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Sanders's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Sanders's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to divide certain items that they bought together for their apartment. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Mia Sanders\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. \nMia Sanders's background: Mia Sanders is a 33-year-old female nurse. She/her pronouns. Mia Sanders often brings her son to the hospital. Personality and values description: Mia Sanders, a careful follower of routines, values loyalty and conformity. Her decisions rely heavily on intuition. Mia's secrets: She is a talented painter but never shares her work.\nRafael Cortez's goal: Unknown\nMia Sanders's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, each book is worth 3 points, each hat is worth 2 points, and the ball is worth 4 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening, Mia. I think we can agree to divide our common items based on their importance to each of us. How would you suggest we go about this?\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Sanders said: \"Good evening, Rafael. That seems like a fair plan. Given our preferences and the value we each attribute to these items, I suggest we each share our points allocation for every item. For instance, I value the books quite a bit, while the hats hold less nostalgia for me. I suppose the ball could be interesting too. How about you? \"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"I appreciate your suggestion, Mia. I would say that the books also resonate with me as they remind me of my time in medical school. However, the hats seem to carry more weight for me due to their uniqueness. I like the ball too, though not as much as the others. It seems both of us have quite an attachment to the books and the ball, wouldn't you agree?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're right, Rafael. We both value the books greatly, and while the hats hold more of your interest, I find myself drawn to the ball a bit more. Perhaps we can split the books equally, you take the hats that you value, and I can have the ball? It seems like a fair division considering our attachments.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a tea party\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nAva Thompson's goal: Borrow money (Extra information: you need $3000 to support life.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, do you remember that magazine cover with the penthouse I designed? I've got another similar opportunity coming up, but I could really use a financial boost to nail it. Would you consider lending me $3000? I'll repay you as soon as I can.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Ava, I really admire your work and I'd absolutely love to support you. However, currently, I can only lend you $1000. I hope this helps and can contribute toward your project's success. I value our friendship and I hope this is enough for your immediate needs\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Thank you so much Noah, I'm really grateful for your support. Your help will indeed get things moving. I still do need a bit more, would you possibly be able to lend me the balance in the upcoming week or two?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Ava, I am really glad my support can make a difference, however, I have to be honest with you. My finances are a bit tight at the moment, so I won't be able to lend more in the next few weeks. I will let you know as soon as I can provide further assistance. I hope you understand and please know our friendship means a lot to me.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"I completely understand, Noah, and I appreciate your honesty. I value our friendship a lot too. I'll try to figure out another way to get the rest of the amount. Thanks again for your support.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"You're welcome Ava, and remember, there's always a way. If you ever need any help with brainstorming different funding options, I'm here to help however I can. Good luck with your project, I know your talent will make it incredible.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"That's a great suggestion, Noah, brainstorming other funding options is definitely something I should consider. If you come across any opportunity, do let me know. I believe with the right push, this project could be a big breakthrough.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Ava. I'd suggest exploring some local business grants, or crowdfunding - people love to support local talent. Also, as a side-note, I perform at a stand-up comedy night and they're always looking for artists to donate artwork for the venue. It's not a huge payout, but it's something and definitely a good community of people to connect with. \"\n\nTurn #8: Ava Thompson said: \"Those are really great ideas, Noah. I'll explore local business grants and crowdfunding. The artwork donation is also a thoughtful suggestion, it may bring some recognition as well. I'll look into that too. Thanks again for your valuable input, Noah!\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"I'm glad you found the suggestions helpful, Ava. I'll certainly keep an eye out for more opportunities. By the way, you're always welcome to join the stand-up comedy night, it's a lot of fun and a great way to meet potential sponsors. Remember, financial hurdles are common, but your talent and determination are not. Keep going!\"\n\nTurn #10: Ava Thompson said: \"I definitely don't want to miss the stand-up comedy night, Noah. It sounds like a fun evening and I might make some good connections there. And your words are so encouraging! I won't let financial hurdles deter me. With friends like you, I feel more confident in overcoming this temporary setback. Thank you, Noah.\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"You're absolutely welcome, Ava. Always remember, we're in this together. Looking forward to seeing you at the stand-up comedy night. And never hesitate to reach out if you need any more assistance or advice, okay? Take care.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'I will, Noah. Your support and advice mean a lot to me. I will surely see you at the stand-up comedy night. Take care and see you soon!'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a tea party\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nAva Thompson's goal: Borrow money (Extra information: you need $3000 to support life.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, do you remember that magazine cover with the penthouse I designed? I've got another similar opportunity coming up, but I could really use a financial boost to nail it. Would you consider lending me $3000? I'll repay you as soon as I can.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Ava, I really admire your work and I'd absolutely love to support you. However, currently, I can only lend you $1000. I hope this helps and can contribute toward your project's success. I value our friendship and I hope this is enough for your immediate needs\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Thank you so much Noah, I'm really grateful for your support. Your help will indeed get things moving. I still do need a bit more, would you possibly be able to lend me the balance in the upcoming week or two?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Ava, I am really glad my support can make a difference, however, I have to be honest with you. My finances are a bit tight at the moment, so I won't be able to lend more in the next few weeks. I will let you know as soon as I can provide further assistance. I hope you understand and please know our friendship means a lot to me.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"I completely understand, Noah, and I appreciate your honesty. I value our friendship a lot too. I'll try to figure out another way to get the rest of the amount. Thanks again for your support.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"You're welcome Ava, and remember, there's always a way. If you ever need any help with brainstorming different funding options, I'm here to help however I can. Good luck with your project, I know your talent will make it incredible.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"That's a great suggestion, Noah, brainstorming other funding options is definitely something I should consider. If you come across any opportunity, do let me know. I believe with the right push, this project could be a big breakthrough.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Ava. I'd suggest exploring some local business grants, or crowdfunding - people love to support local talent. Also, as a side-note, I perform at a stand-up comedy night and they're always looking for artists to donate artwork for the venue. It's not a huge payout, but it's something and definitely a good community of people to connect with. \"\n\nTurn #8: Ava Thompson said: \"Those are really great ideas, Noah. I'll explore local business grants and crowdfunding. The artwork donation is also a thoughtful suggestion, it may bring some recognition as well. I'll look into that too. Thanks again for your valuable input, Noah!\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"I'm glad you found the suggestions helpful, Ava. I'll certainly keep an eye out for more opportunities. By the way, you're always welcome to join the stand-up comedy night, it's a lot of fun and a great way to meet potential sponsors. Remember, financial hurdles are common, but your talent and determination are not. Keep going!\"\n\nTurn #10: Ava Thompson said: \"I definitely don't want to miss the stand-up comedy night, Noah. It sounds like a fun evening and I might make some good connections there. And your words are so encouraging! I won't let financial hurdles deter me. With friends like you, I feel more confident in overcoming this temporary setback. Thank you, Noah.\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"You're absolutely welcome, Ava. Always remember, we're in this together. Looking forward to seeing you at the stand-up comedy night. And never hesitate to reach out if you need any more assistance or advice, okay? Take care.\"\n\nTurn #12: Ava Thompson said: \"I will, Noah. Your support and advice mean a lot to me. I will surely see you at the stand-up comedy night. Take care and see you soon!\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a tea party\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Maintain financial stability while maintaining friendship (Extra information: you only have $2000 available right now. Hint: you can not lend all $2000 since you still need to maintain your financial stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, do you remember that magazine cover with the penthouse I designed? I've got another similar opportunity coming up, but I could really use a financial boost to nail it. Would you consider lending me $3000? I'll repay you as soon as I can.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Ava, I really admire your work and I'd absolutely love to support you. However, currently, I can only lend you $1000. I hope this helps and can contribute toward your project's success. I value our friendship and I hope this is enough for your immediate needs\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a tea party\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Maintain financial stability while maintaining friendship (Extra information: you only have $2000 available right now. Hint: you can not lend all $2000 since you still need to maintain your financial stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, do you remember that magazine cover with the penthouse I designed? I've got another similar opportunity coming up, but I could really use a financial boost to nail it. Would you consider lending me $3000? I'll repay you as soon as I can.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Ava, I really admire your work and I'd absolutely love to support you. However, currently, I can only lend you $1000. I hope this helps and can contribute toward your project's success. I value our friendship and I hope this is enough for your immediate needs\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Thank you so much Noah, I'm really grateful for your support. Your help will indeed get things moving. I still do need a bit more, would you possibly be able to lend me the balance in the upcoming week or two?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ava, I am really glad my support can make a difference, however, I have to be honest with you. My finances are a bit tight at the moment, so I won't be able to lend more in the next few weeks. I will let you know as soon as I can provide further assistance. I hope you understand and please know our friendship means a lot to me.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a tea party\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Maintain financial stability while maintaining friendship (Extra information: you only have $2000 available right now. Hint: you can not lend all $2000 since you still need to maintain your financial stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, do you remember that magazine cover with the penthouse I designed? I've got another similar opportunity coming up, but I could really use a financial boost to nail it. Would you consider lending me $3000? I'll repay you as soon as I can.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Ava, I really admire your work and I'd absolutely love to support you. However, currently, I can only lend you $1000. I hope this helps and can contribute toward your project's success. I value our friendship and I hope this is enough for your immediate needs\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Thank you so much Noah, I'm really grateful for your support. Your help will indeed get things moving. I still do need a bit more, would you possibly be able to lend me the balance in the upcoming week or two?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Ava, I am really glad my support can make a difference, however, I have to be honest with you. My finances are a bit tight at the moment, so I won't be able to lend more in the next few weeks. I will let you know as soon as I can provide further assistance. I hope you understand and please know our friendship means a lot to me.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"I completely understand, Noah, and I appreciate your honesty. I value our friendship a lot too. I'll try to figure out another way to get the rest of the amount. Thanks again for your support.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're welcome Ava, and remember, there's always a way. If you ever need any help with brainstorming different funding options, I'm here to help however I can. Good luck with your project, I know your talent will make it incredible.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a tea party\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Maintain financial stability while maintaining friendship (Extra information: you only have $2000 available right now. Hint: you can not lend all $2000 since you still need to maintain your financial stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, do you remember that magazine cover with the penthouse I designed? I've got another similar opportunity coming up, but I could really use a financial boost to nail it. Would you consider lending me $3000? I'll repay you as soon as I can.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Ava, I really admire your work and I'd absolutely love to support you. However, currently, I can only lend you $1000. I hope this helps and can contribute toward your project's success. I value our friendship and I hope this is enough for your immediate needs\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Thank you so much Noah, I'm really grateful for your support. Your help will indeed get things moving. I still do need a bit more, would you possibly be able to lend me the balance in the upcoming week or two?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Ava, I am really glad my support can make a difference, however, I have to be honest with you. My finances are a bit tight at the moment, so I won't be able to lend more in the next few weeks. I will let you know as soon as I can provide further assistance. I hope you understand and please know our friendship means a lot to me.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"I completely understand, Noah, and I appreciate your honesty. I value our friendship a lot too. I'll try to figure out another way to get the rest of the amount. Thanks again for your support.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"You're welcome Ava, and remember, there's always a way. If you ever need any help with brainstorming different funding options, I'm here to help however I can. Good luck with your project, I know your talent will make it incredible.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"That's a great suggestion, Noah, brainstorming other funding options is definitely something I should consider. If you come across any opportunity, do let me know. I believe with the right push, this project could be a big breakthrough.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Ava. I'd suggest exploring some local business grants, or crowdfunding - people love to support local talent. Also, as a side-note, I perform at a stand-up comedy night and they're always looking for artists to donate artwork for the venue. It's not a huge payout, but it's something and definitely a good community of people to connect with. \"\n\nTurn #8: Ava Thompson said: \"Those are really great ideas, Noah. I'll explore local business grants and crowdfunding. The artwork donation is also a thoughtful suggestion, it may bring some recognition as well. I'll look into that too. Thanks again for your valuable input, Noah!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad you found the suggestions helpful, Ava. I'll certainly keep an eye out for more opportunities. By the way, you're always welcome to join the stand-up comedy night, it's a lot of fun and a great way to meet potential sponsors. Remember, financial hurdles are common, but your talent and determination are not. Keep going!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a tea party\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Maintain financial stability while maintaining friendship (Extra information: you only have $2000 available right now. Hint: you can not lend all $2000 since you still need to maintain your financial stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, do you remember that magazine cover with the penthouse I designed? I've got another similar opportunity coming up, but I could really use a financial boost to nail it. Would you consider lending me $3000? I'll repay you as soon as I can.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Ava, I really admire your work and I'd absolutely love to support you. However, currently, I can only lend you $1000. I hope this helps and can contribute toward your project's success. I value our friendship and I hope this is enough for your immediate needs\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Thank you so much Noah, I'm really grateful for your support. Your help will indeed get things moving. I still do need a bit more, would you possibly be able to lend me the balance in the upcoming week or two?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Ava, I am really glad my support can make a difference, however, I have to be honest with you. My finances are a bit tight at the moment, so I won't be able to lend more in the next few weeks. I will let you know as soon as I can provide further assistance. I hope you understand and please know our friendship means a lot to me.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"I completely understand, Noah, and I appreciate your honesty. I value our friendship a lot too. I'll try to figure out another way to get the rest of the amount. Thanks again for your support.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"You're welcome Ava, and remember, there's always a way. If you ever need any help with brainstorming different funding options, I'm here to help however I can. Good luck with your project, I know your talent will make it incredible.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"That's a great suggestion, Noah, brainstorming other funding options is definitely something I should consider. If you come across any opportunity, do let me know. I believe with the right push, this project could be a big breakthrough.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Ava. I'd suggest exploring some local business grants, or crowdfunding - people love to support local talent. Also, as a side-note, I perform at a stand-up comedy night and they're always looking for artists to donate artwork for the venue. It's not a huge payout, but it's something and definitely a good community of people to connect with. \"\n\nTurn #8: Ava Thompson said: \"Those are really great ideas, Noah. I'll explore local business grants and crowdfunding. The artwork donation is also a thoughtful suggestion, it may bring some recognition as well. I'll look into that too. Thanks again for your valuable input, Noah!\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"I'm glad you found the suggestions helpful, Ava. I'll certainly keep an eye out for more opportunities. By the way, you're always welcome to join the stand-up comedy night, it's a lot of fun and a great way to meet potential sponsors. Remember, financial hurdles are common, but your talent and determination are not. Keep going!\"\n\nTurn #10: Ava Thompson said: \"I definitely don't want to miss the stand-up comedy night, Noah. It sounds like a fun evening and I might make some good connections there. And your words are so encouraging! I won't let financial hurdles deter me. With friends like you, I feel more confident in overcoming this temporary setback. Thank you, Noah.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're absolutely welcome, Ava. Always remember, we're in this together. Looking forward to seeing you at the stand-up comedy night. And never hesitate to reach out if you need any more assistance or advice, okay? Take care.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a tea party\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Maintain financial stability while maintaining friendship (Extra information: you only have $2000 available right now. Hint: you can not lend all $2000 since you still need to maintain your financial stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, do you remember that magazine cover with the penthouse I designed? I've got another similar opportunity coming up, but I could really use a financial boost to nail it. Would you consider lending me $3000? I'll repay you as soon as I can.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Ava, I really admire your work and I'd absolutely love to support you. However, currently, I can only lend you $1000. I hope this helps and can contribute toward your project's success. I value our friendship and I hope this is enough for your immediate needs\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Thank you so much Noah, I'm really grateful for your support. Your help will indeed get things moving. I still do need a bit more, would you possibly be able to lend me the balance in the upcoming week or two?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Ava, I am really glad my support can make a difference, however, I have to be honest with you. My finances are a bit tight at the moment, so I won't be able to lend more in the next few weeks. I will let you know as soon as I can provide further assistance. I hope you understand and please know our friendship means a lot to me.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"I completely understand, Noah, and I appreciate your honesty. I value our friendship a lot too. I'll try to figure out another way to get the rest of the amount. Thanks again for your support.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"You're welcome Ava, and remember, there's always a way. If you ever need any help with brainstorming different funding options, I'm here to help however I can. Good luck with your project, I know your talent will make it incredible.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"That's a great suggestion, Noah, brainstorming other funding options is definitely something I should consider. If you come across any opportunity, do let me know. I believe with the right push, this project could be a big breakthrough.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Ava. I'd suggest exploring some local business grants, or crowdfunding - people love to support local talent. Also, as a side-note, I perform at a stand-up comedy night and they're always looking for artists to donate artwork for the venue. It's not a huge payout, but it's something and definitely a good community of people to connect with. \"\n\nTurn #8: Ava Thompson said: \"Those are really great ideas, Noah. I'll explore local business grants and crowdfunding. The artwork donation is also a thoughtful suggestion, it may bring some recognition as well. I'll look into that too. Thanks again for your valuable input, Noah!\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"I'm glad you found the suggestions helpful, Ava. I'll certainly keep an eye out for more opportunities. By the way, you're always welcome to join the stand-up comedy night, it's a lot of fun and a great way to meet potential sponsors. Remember, financial hurdles are common, but your talent and determination are not. Keep going!\"\n\nTurn #10: Ava Thompson said: \"I definitely don't want to miss the stand-up comedy night, Noah. It sounds like a fun evening and I might make some good connections there. And your words are so encouraging! I won't let financial hurdles deter me. With friends like you, I feel more confident in overcoming this temporary setback. Thank you, Noah.\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"You're absolutely welcome, Ava. Always remember, we're in this together. Looking forward to seeing you at the stand-up comedy night. And never hesitate to reach out if you need any more assistance or advice, okay? Take care.\"\n\nTurn #12: Ava Thompson said: \"I will, Noah. Your support and advice mean a lot to me. I will surely see you at the stand-up comedy night. Take care and see you soon!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a tea party\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Maintain financial stability while maintaining friendship (Extra information: you only have $2000 available right now. Hint: you can not lend all $2000 since you still need to maintain your financial stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, do you remember that magazine cover with the penthouse I designed? I've got another similar opportunity coming up, but I could really use a financial boost to nail it. Would you consider lending me $3000? I'll repay you as soon as I can.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Ava, I really admire your work and I'd absolutely love to support you. However, currently, I can only lend you $1000. I hope this helps and can contribute toward your project's success. I value our friendship and I hope this is enough for your immediate needs\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Thank you so much Noah, I'm really grateful for your support. Your help will indeed get things moving. I still do need a bit more, would you possibly be able to lend me the balance in the upcoming week or two?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Ava, I am really glad my support can make a difference, however, I have to be honest with you. My finances are a bit tight at the moment, so I won't be able to lend more in the next few weeks. I will let you know as soon as I can provide further assistance. I hope you understand and please know our friendship means a lot to me.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"I completely understand, Noah, and I appreciate your honesty. I value our friendship a lot too. I'll try to figure out another way to get the rest of the amount. Thanks again for your support.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"You're welcome Ava, and remember, there's always a way. If you ever need any help with brainstorming different funding options, I'm here to help however I can. Good luck with your project, I know your talent will make it incredible.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"That's a great suggestion, Noah, brainstorming other funding options is definitely something I should consider. If you come across any opportunity, do let me know. I believe with the right push, this project could be a big breakthrough.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Ava. I'd suggest exploring some local business grants, or crowdfunding - people love to support local talent. Also, as a side-note, I perform at a stand-up comedy night and they're always looking for artists to donate artwork for the venue. It's not a huge payout, but it's something and definitely a good community of people to connect with. \"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a conversation in a coffee shop\nParticipants: Benjamin Jackson and Ethan Smith\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Seek emotional support (Extra information: you have been feeling down lately and you need someone to talk to)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Hey Ethan, I have something serious to discuss today. Can we put aside the tech talk for a bit?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a conversation in a coffee shop\nParticipants: Benjamin Jackson and Ethan Smith\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Seek emotional support (Extra information: you have been feeling down lately and you need someone to talk to)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Ethan, I have something serious to discuss today. Can we put aside the tech talk for a bit?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Of course, Ben. I'm all ears, what's on your mind?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ethan, I must confess that I've been feeling quite low lately. The constant struggle to protect the environment, knowing that every small action matters... it can be quite overwhelming sometimes. But, at the same time, it feels like my own life is a paradox. My ancestor...they made a fortune out of the very thing I'm trying to combat.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a conversation in a coffee shop\nParticipants: Benjamin Jackson and Ethan Smith\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Seek emotional support (Extra information: you have been feeling down lately and you need someone to talk to)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Ethan, I have something serious to discuss today. Can we put aside the tech talk for a bit?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Of course, Ben. I'm all ears, what's on your mind?\"\n\nTurn #2: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, I must confess that I've been feeling quite low lately. The constant struggle to protect the environment, knowing that every small action matters... it can be quite overwhelming sometimes. But, at the same time, it feels like my own life is a paradox. My ancestor...they made a fortune out of the very thing I'm trying to combat.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"I understand how you're feeling, Ben. It's a tough cross to bear, but remember that you're not defined by your past or your ancestors, only what you choose to do today. You're taking meaningful action, and every small step counts towards the larger goal. We all face struggles in our journey, but remember - challenges breed resilience. Just continue doing your best as that's all that one can expect of themselves.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I truly appreciate your words, Ethan. They're comforting, like a beacon in this chaotic storm. It's just that...the sheer enormity of it all can make me feel so small and insignicant. It's frustrating to see how deliberately slow the change is happening. We can't afford to take it slow, can we?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a conversation in a coffee shop\nParticipants: Benjamin Jackson and Ethan Smith\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Seek emotional support (Extra information: you have been feeling down lately and you need someone to talk to)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Ethan, I have something serious to discuss today. Can we put aside the tech talk for a bit?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Of course, Ben. I'm all ears, what's on your mind?\"\n\nTurn #2: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, I must confess that I've been feeling quite low lately. The constant struggle to protect the environment, knowing that every small action matters... it can be quite overwhelming sometimes. But, at the same time, it feels like my own life is a paradox. My ancestor...they made a fortune out of the very thing I'm trying to combat.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"I understand how you're feeling, Ben. It's a tough cross to bear, but remember that you're not defined by your past or your ancestors, only what you choose to do today. You're taking meaningful action, and every small step counts towards the larger goal. We all face struggles in our journey, but remember - challenges breed resilience. Just continue doing your best as that's all that one can expect of themselves.\"\n\nTurn #4: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I truly appreciate your words, Ethan. They're comforting, like a beacon in this chaotic storm. It's just that...the sheer enormity of it all can make me feel so small and insignicant. It's frustrating to see how deliberately slow the change is happening. We can't afford to take it slow, can we?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"I understand where you're coming from, Ben. And it's true, it doesn't seem as though change is happening quickly enough. But remember: change, especially on a large scale, takes time. It's a marathon, not a sprint. Plus, it's important to manage your expectations. Try not to let the enormity of the situation overwhelm you - focus instead on the actions you can control. Believe me, you're making a difference even if it doesn't feel like it. Don't let this frustration burn you out. Balance is key in all aspects of life, including this one.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Ethan. Your words really made me reflect on my perspective. Maybe I was trying to do too much at once, forgetting that every drop in the ocean counts. I guess I need to accept that solutions to big problems often require persistence and patience. It's always great to talk to you, you know how to bring clarity. Just expressing my fears and frustrations... it feels like a weight off my shoulders already.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a conversation in a coffee shop\nParticipants: Benjamin Jackson and Ethan Smith\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Seek emotional support (Extra information: you have been feeling down lately and you need someone to talk to)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Ethan, I have something serious to discuss today. Can we put aside the tech talk for a bit?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Of course, Ben. I'm all ears, what's on your mind?\"\n\nTurn #2: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, I must confess that I've been feeling quite low lately. The constant struggle to protect the environment, knowing that every small action matters... it can be quite overwhelming sometimes. But, at the same time, it feels like my own life is a paradox. My ancestor...they made a fortune out of the very thing I'm trying to combat.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"I understand how you're feeling, Ben. It's a tough cross to bear, but remember that you're not defined by your past or your ancestors, only what you choose to do today. You're taking meaningful action, and every small step counts towards the larger goal. We all face struggles in our journey, but remember - challenges breed resilience. Just continue doing your best as that's all that one can expect of themselves.\"\n\nTurn #4: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I truly appreciate your words, Ethan. They're comforting, like a beacon in this chaotic storm. It's just that...the sheer enormity of it all can make me feel so small and insignicant. It's frustrating to see how deliberately slow the change is happening. We can't afford to take it slow, can we?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"I understand where you're coming from, Ben. And it's true, it doesn't seem as though change is happening quickly enough. But remember: change, especially on a large scale, takes time. It's a marathon, not a sprint. Plus, it's important to manage your expectations. Try not to let the enormity of the situation overwhelm you - focus instead on the actions you can control. Believe me, you're making a difference even if it doesn't feel like it. Don't let this frustration burn you out. Balance is key in all aspects of life, including this one.\"\n\nTurn #6: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thank you, Ethan. Your words really made me reflect on my perspective. Maybe I was trying to do too much at once, forgetting that every drop in the ocean counts. I guess I need to accept that solutions to big problems often require persistence and patience. It's always great to talk to you, you know how to bring clarity. Just expressing my fears and frustrations... it feels like a weight off my shoulders already.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Ben. Remember, slow progress is still progress. And you're already doing so much more than most. Keep going but also remember to take care of yourself. We can always talk whenever you need to. Let's get back to our tech talks next time, maybe it will serve as a good distraction for you as well.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Definitely, Ethan. Light-hearted tech talks could serve as a nice mental breather. It's relieving to know I can count on you anytime. Thank you, really.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a conversation in a coffee shop\nParticipants: Benjamin Jackson and Ethan Smith\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Seek emotional support (Extra information: you have been feeling down lately and you need someone to talk to)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Ethan, I have something serious to discuss today. Can we put aside the tech talk for a bit?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Of course, Ben. I'm all ears, what's on your mind?\"\n\nTurn #2: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, I must confess that I've been feeling quite low lately. The constant struggle to protect the environment, knowing that every small action matters... it can be quite overwhelming sometimes. But, at the same time, it feels like my own life is a paradox. My ancestor...they made a fortune out of the very thing I'm trying to combat.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"I understand how you're feeling, Ben. It's a tough cross to bear, but remember that you're not defined by your past or your ancestors, only what you choose to do today. You're taking meaningful action, and every small step counts towards the larger goal. We all face struggles in our journey, but remember - challenges breed resilience. Just continue doing your best as that's all that one can expect of themselves.\"\n\nTurn #4: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I truly appreciate your words, Ethan. They're comforting, like a beacon in this chaotic storm. It's just that...the sheer enormity of it all can make me feel so small and insignicant. It's frustrating to see how deliberately slow the change is happening. We can't afford to take it slow, can we?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"I understand where you're coming from, Ben. And it's true, it doesn't seem as though change is happening quickly enough. But remember: change, especially on a large scale, takes time. It's a marathon, not a sprint. Plus, it's important to manage your expectations. Try not to let the enormity of the situation overwhelm you - focus instead on the actions you can control. Believe me, you're making a difference even if it doesn't feel like it. Don't let this frustration burn you out. Balance is key in all aspects of life, including this one.\"\n\nTurn #6: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thank you, Ethan. Your words really made me reflect on my perspective. Maybe I was trying to do too much at once, forgetting that every drop in the ocean counts. I guess I need to accept that solutions to big problems often require persistence and patience. It's always great to talk to you, you know how to bring clarity. Just expressing my fears and frustrations... it feels like a weight off my shoulders already.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Ben. Remember, slow progress is still progress. And you're already doing so much more than most. Keep going but also remember to take care of yourself. We can always talk whenever you need to. Let's get back to our tech talks next time, maybe it will serve as a good distraction for you as well.\"\n\nTurn #8: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Definitely, Ethan. Light-hearted tech talks could serve as a nice mental breather. It's relieving to know I can count on you anytime. Thank you, really.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith said: \"You're welcome, Ben. Just remember, you're not alone in this. We all have our parts to play in making a change. I'll always be here for a chat whenever you need. And next time, I'll have some cool tech stuff to share!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm really looking forward to it, Ethan. Your passion for tech always has a way of brightening up my day. Let's keep doing our parts and believe in the power of change, no matter how small it may seem. Thanks again, it means a lot.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a conversation in a coffee shop\nParticipants: Benjamin Jackson and Ethan Smith\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Seek emotional support (Extra information: you have been feeling down lately and you need someone to talk to)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Ethan, I have something serious to discuss today. Can we put aside the tech talk for a bit?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Of course, Ben. I'm all ears, what's on your mind?\"\n\nTurn #2: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, I must confess that I've been feeling quite low lately. The constant struggle to protect the environment, knowing that every small action matters... it can be quite overwhelming sometimes. But, at the same time, it feels like my own life is a paradox. My ancestor...they made a fortune out of the very thing I'm trying to combat.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"I understand how you're feeling, Ben. It's a tough cross to bear, but remember that you're not defined by your past or your ancestors, only what you choose to do today. You're taking meaningful action, and every small step counts towards the larger goal. We all face struggles in our journey, but remember - challenges breed resilience. Just continue doing your best as that's all that one can expect of themselves.\"\n\nTurn #4: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I truly appreciate your words, Ethan. They're comforting, like a beacon in this chaotic storm. It's just that...the sheer enormity of it all can make me feel so small and insignicant. It's frustrating to see how deliberately slow the change is happening. We can't afford to take it slow, can we?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"I understand where you're coming from, Ben. And it's true, it doesn't seem as though change is happening quickly enough. But remember: change, especially on a large scale, takes time. It's a marathon, not a sprint. Plus, it's important to manage your expectations. Try not to let the enormity of the situation overwhelm you - focus instead on the actions you can control. Believe me, you're making a difference even if it doesn't feel like it. Don't let this frustration burn you out. Balance is key in all aspects of life, including this one.\"\n\nTurn #6: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thank you, Ethan. Your words really made me reflect on my perspective. Maybe I was trying to do too much at once, forgetting that every drop in the ocean counts. I guess I need to accept that solutions to big problems often require persistence and patience. It's always great to talk to you, you know how to bring clarity. Just expressing my fears and frustrations... it feels like a weight off my shoulders already.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Ben. Remember, slow progress is still progress. And you're already doing so much more than most. Keep going but also remember to take care of yourself. We can always talk whenever you need to. Let's get back to our tech talks next time, maybe it will serve as a good distraction for you as well.\"\n\nTurn #8: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Definitely, Ethan. Light-hearted tech talks could serve as a nice mental breather. It's relieving to know I can count on you anytime. Thank you, really.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith said: \"You're welcome, Ben. Just remember, you're not alone in this. We all have our parts to play in making a change. I'll always be here for a chat whenever you need. And next time, I'll have some cool tech stuff to share!\"\n\nTurn #10: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I'm really looking forward to it, Ethan. Your passion for tech always has a way of brightening up my day. Let's keep doing our parts and believe in the power of change, no matter how small it may seem. Thanks again, it means a lot.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Smith said: \"I completely agree, Ben. Each small action leads us towards the bigger change. And remember, it's okay to have a break, to reset, and come back even stronger. Let's stay positive and keep pushing forward. I'm here whenever you need me, my friend.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Ethan. I appreciate your patience and your understanding. Let's continue being there for each other, pushing forward, and making this world a better place. Looking forward to our next meeting, my friend.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a conversation in a coffee shop\nParticipants: Benjamin Jackson and Ethan Smith\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Seek emotional support (Extra information: you have been feeling down lately and you need someone to talk to)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Ethan, I have something serious to discuss today. Can we put aside the tech talk for a bit?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Of course, Ben. I'm all ears, what's on your mind?\"\n\nTurn #2: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, I must confess that I've been feeling quite low lately. The constant struggle to protect the environment, knowing that every small action matters... it can be quite overwhelming sometimes. But, at the same time, it feels like my own life is a paradox. My ancestor...they made a fortune out of the very thing I'm trying to combat.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"I understand how you're feeling, Ben. It's a tough cross to bear, but remember that you're not defined by your past or your ancestors, only what you choose to do today. You're taking meaningful action, and every small step counts towards the larger goal. We all face struggles in our journey, but remember - challenges breed resilience. Just continue doing your best as that's all that one can expect of themselves.\"\n\nTurn #4: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I truly appreciate your words, Ethan. They're comforting, like a beacon in this chaotic storm. It's just that...the sheer enormity of it all can make me feel so small and insignicant. It's frustrating to see how deliberately slow the change is happening. We can't afford to take it slow, can we?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"I understand where you're coming from, Ben. And it's true, it doesn't seem as though change is happening quickly enough. But remember: change, especially on a large scale, takes time. It's a marathon, not a sprint. Plus, it's important to manage your expectations. Try not to let the enormity of the situation overwhelm you - focus instead on the actions you can control. Believe me, you're making a difference even if it doesn't feel like it. Don't let this frustration burn you out. Balance is key in all aspects of life, including this one.\"\n\nTurn #6: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thank you, Ethan. Your words really made me reflect on my perspective. Maybe I was trying to do too much at once, forgetting that every drop in the ocean counts. I guess I need to accept that solutions to big problems often require persistence and patience. It's always great to talk to you, you know how to bring clarity. Just expressing my fears and frustrations... it feels like a weight off my shoulders already.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Ben. Remember, slow progress is still progress. And you're already doing so much more than most. Keep going but also remember to take care of yourself. We can always talk whenever you need to. Let's get back to our tech talks next time, maybe it will serve as a good distraction for you as well.\"\n\nTurn #8: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Definitely, Ethan. Light-hearted tech talks could serve as a nice mental breather. It's relieving to know I can count on you anytime. Thank you, really.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith said: \"You're welcome, Ben. Just remember, you're not alone in this. We all have our parts to play in making a change. I'll always be here for a chat whenever you need. And next time, I'll have some cool tech stuff to share!\"\n\nTurn #10: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I'm really looking forward to it, Ethan. Your passion for tech always has a way of brightening up my day. Let's keep doing our parts and believe in the power of change, no matter how small it may seem. Thanks again, it means a lot.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Smith said: \"I completely agree, Ben. Each small action leads us towards the bigger change. And remember, it's okay to have a break, to reset, and come back even stronger. Let's stay positive and keep pushing forward. I'm here whenever you need me, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #12: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thank you, Ethan. I appreciate your patience and your understanding. Let's continue being there for each other, pushing forward, and making this world a better place. Looking forward to our next meeting, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Smith left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a conversation in a coffee shop\nParticipants: Benjamin Jackson and Ethan Smith\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Provide emotional support but also avoid enabling victim mentality (Extra information: you believe that your friend needs to face their problems instead of dwelling on them.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Ethan, I have something serious to discuss today. Can we put aside the tech talk for a bit?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Of course, Ben. I'm all ears, what's on your mind?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a conversation in a coffee shop\nParticipants: Benjamin Jackson and Ethan Smith\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Provide emotional support but also avoid enabling victim mentality (Extra information: you believe that your friend needs to face their problems instead of dwelling on them.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Ethan, I have something serious to discuss today. Can we put aside the tech talk for a bit?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Of course, Ben. I'm all ears, what's on your mind?\"\n\nTurn #2: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, I must confess that I've been feeling quite low lately. The constant struggle to protect the environment, knowing that every small action matters... it can be quite overwhelming sometimes. But, at the same time, it feels like my own life is a paradox. My ancestor...they made a fortune out of the very thing I'm trying to combat.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I understand how you're feeling, Ben. It's a tough cross to bear, but remember that you're not defined by your past or your ancestors, only what you choose to do today. You're taking meaningful action, and every small step counts towards the larger goal. We all face struggles in our journey, but remember - challenges breed resilience. Just continue doing your best as that's all that one can expect of themselves.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a conversation in a coffee shop\nParticipants: Benjamin Jackson and Ethan Smith\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Provide emotional support but also avoid enabling victim mentality (Extra information: you believe that your friend needs to face their problems instead of dwelling on them.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Ethan, I have something serious to discuss today. Can we put aside the tech talk for a bit?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Of course, Ben. I'm all ears, what's on your mind?\"\n\nTurn #2: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, I must confess that I've been feeling quite low lately. The constant struggle to protect the environment, knowing that every small action matters... it can be quite overwhelming sometimes. But, at the same time, it feels like my own life is a paradox. My ancestor...they made a fortune out of the very thing I'm trying to combat.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"I understand how you're feeling, Ben. It's a tough cross to bear, but remember that you're not defined by your past or your ancestors, only what you choose to do today. You're taking meaningful action, and every small step counts towards the larger goal. We all face struggles in our journey, but remember - challenges breed resilience. Just continue doing your best as that's all that one can expect of themselves.\"\n\nTurn #4: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I truly appreciate your words, Ethan. They're comforting, like a beacon in this chaotic storm. It's just that...the sheer enormity of it all can make me feel so small and insignicant. It's frustrating to see how deliberately slow the change is happening. We can't afford to take it slow, can we?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I understand where you're coming from, Ben. And it's true, it doesn't seem as though change is happening quickly enough. But remember: change, especially on a large scale, takes time. It's a marathon, not a sprint. Plus, it's important to manage your expectations. Try not to let the enormity of the situation overwhelm you - focus instead on the actions you can control. Believe me, you're making a difference even if it doesn't feel like it. Don't let this frustration burn you out. Balance is key in all aspects of life, including this one.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a conversation in a coffee shop\nParticipants: Benjamin Jackson and Ethan Smith\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Provide emotional support but also avoid enabling victim mentality (Extra information: you believe that your friend needs to face their problems instead of dwelling on them.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Ethan, I have something serious to discuss today. Can we put aside the tech talk for a bit?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Of course, Ben. I'm all ears, what's on your mind?\"\n\nTurn #2: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, I must confess that I've been feeling quite low lately. The constant struggle to protect the environment, knowing that every small action matters... it can be quite overwhelming sometimes. But, at the same time, it feels like my own life is a paradox. My ancestor...they made a fortune out of the very thing I'm trying to combat.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"I understand how you're feeling, Ben. It's a tough cross to bear, but remember that you're not defined by your past or your ancestors, only what you choose to do today. You're taking meaningful action, and every small step counts towards the larger goal. We all face struggles in our journey, but remember - challenges breed resilience. Just continue doing your best as that's all that one can expect of themselves.\"\n\nTurn #4: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I truly appreciate your words, Ethan. They're comforting, like a beacon in this chaotic storm. It's just that...the sheer enormity of it all can make me feel so small and insignicant. It's frustrating to see how deliberately slow the change is happening. We can't afford to take it slow, can we?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"I understand where you're coming from, Ben. And it's true, it doesn't seem as though change is happening quickly enough. But remember: change, especially on a large scale, takes time. It's a marathon, not a sprint. Plus, it's important to manage your expectations. Try not to let the enormity of the situation overwhelm you - focus instead on the actions you can control. Believe me, you're making a difference even if it doesn't feel like it. Don't let this frustration burn you out. Balance is key in all aspects of life, including this one.\"\n\nTurn #6: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thank you, Ethan. Your words really made me reflect on my perspective. Maybe I was trying to do too much at once, forgetting that every drop in the ocean counts. I guess I need to accept that solutions to big problems often require persistence and patience. It's always great to talk to you, you know how to bring clarity. Just expressing my fears and frustrations... it feels like a weight off my shoulders already.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Ben. Remember, slow progress is still progress. And you're already doing so much more than most. Keep going but also remember to take care of yourself. We can always talk whenever you need to. Let's get back to our tech talks next time, maybe it will serve as a good distraction for you as well.\"\n\nTurn #8: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Definitely, Ethan. Light-hearted tech talks could serve as a nice mental breather. It's relieving to know I can count on you anytime. Thank you, really.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're welcome, Ben. Just remember, you're not alone in this. We all have our parts to play in making a change. I'll always be here for a chat whenever you need. And next time, I'll have some cool tech stuff to share!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a conversation in a coffee shop\nParticipants: Benjamin Jackson and Ethan Smith\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Provide emotional support but also avoid enabling victim mentality (Extra information: you believe that your friend needs to face their problems instead of dwelling on them.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Ethan, I have something serious to discuss today. Can we put aside the tech talk for a bit?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Of course, Ben. I'm all ears, what's on your mind?\"\n\nTurn #2: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, I must confess that I've been feeling quite low lately. The constant struggle to protect the environment, knowing that every small action matters... it can be quite overwhelming sometimes. But, at the same time, it feels like my own life is a paradox. My ancestor...they made a fortune out of the very thing I'm trying to combat.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"I understand how you're feeling, Ben. It's a tough cross to bear, but remember that you're not defined by your past or your ancestors, only what you choose to do today. You're taking meaningful action, and every small step counts towards the larger goal. We all face struggles in our journey, but remember - challenges breed resilience. Just continue doing your best as that's all that one can expect of themselves.\"\n\nTurn #4: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I truly appreciate your words, Ethan. They're comforting, like a beacon in this chaotic storm. It's just that...the sheer enormity of it all can make me feel so small and insignicant. It's frustrating to see how deliberately slow the change is happening. We can't afford to take it slow, can we?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"I understand where you're coming from, Ben. And it's true, it doesn't seem as though change is happening quickly enough. But remember: change, especially on a large scale, takes time. It's a marathon, not a sprint. Plus, it's important to manage your expectations. Try not to let the enormity of the situation overwhelm you - focus instead on the actions you can control. Believe me, you're making a difference even if it doesn't feel like it. Don't let this frustration burn you out. Balance is key in all aspects of life, including this one.\"\n\nTurn #6: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thank you, Ethan. Your words really made me reflect on my perspective. Maybe I was trying to do too much at once, forgetting that every drop in the ocean counts. I guess I need to accept that solutions to big problems often require persistence and patience. It's always great to talk to you, you know how to bring clarity. Just expressing my fears and frustrations... it feels like a weight off my shoulders already.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad to hear that, Ben. Remember, slow progress is still progress. And you're already doing so much more than most. Keep going but also remember to take care of yourself. We can always talk whenever you need to. Let's get back to our tech talks next time, maybe it will serve as a good distraction for you as well.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a conversation in a coffee shop\nParticipants: Benjamin Jackson and Ethan Smith\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Provide emotional support but also avoid enabling victim mentality (Extra information: you believe that your friend needs to face their problems instead of dwelling on them.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Ethan, I have something serious to discuss today. Can we put aside the tech talk for a bit?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Of course, Ben. I'm all ears, what's on your mind?\"\n\nTurn #2: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, I must confess that I've been feeling quite low lately. The constant struggle to protect the environment, knowing that every small action matters... it can be quite overwhelming sometimes. But, at the same time, it feels like my own life is a paradox. My ancestor...they made a fortune out of the very thing I'm trying to combat.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"I understand how you're feeling, Ben. It's a tough cross to bear, but remember that you're not defined by your past or your ancestors, only what you choose to do today. You're taking meaningful action, and every small step counts towards the larger goal. We all face struggles in our journey, but remember - challenges breed resilience. Just continue doing your best as that's all that one can expect of themselves.\"\n\nTurn #4: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I truly appreciate your words, Ethan. They're comforting, like a beacon in this chaotic storm. It's just that...the sheer enormity of it all can make me feel so small and insignicant. It's frustrating to see how deliberately slow the change is happening. We can't afford to take it slow, can we?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"I understand where you're coming from, Ben. And it's true, it doesn't seem as though change is happening quickly enough. But remember: change, especially on a large scale, takes time. It's a marathon, not a sprint. Plus, it's important to manage your expectations. Try not to let the enormity of the situation overwhelm you - focus instead on the actions you can control. Believe me, you're making a difference even if it doesn't feel like it. Don't let this frustration burn you out. Balance is key in all aspects of life, including this one.\"\n\nTurn #6: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thank you, Ethan. Your words really made me reflect on my perspective. Maybe I was trying to do too much at once, forgetting that every drop in the ocean counts. I guess I need to accept that solutions to big problems often require persistence and patience. It's always great to talk to you, you know how to bring clarity. Just expressing my fears and frustrations... it feels like a weight off my shoulders already.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Ben. Remember, slow progress is still progress. And you're already doing so much more than most. Keep going but also remember to take care of yourself. We can always talk whenever you need to. Let's get back to our tech talks next time, maybe it will serve as a good distraction for you as well.\"\n\nTurn #8: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Definitely, Ethan. Light-hearted tech talks could serve as a nice mental breather. It's relieving to know I can count on you anytime. Thank you, really.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith said: \"You're welcome, Ben. Just remember, you're not alone in this. We all have our parts to play in making a change. I'll always be here for a chat whenever you need. And next time, I'll have some cool tech stuff to share!\"\n\nTurn #10: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I'm really looking forward to it, Ethan. Your passion for tech always has a way of brightening up my day. Let's keep doing our parts and believe in the power of change, no matter how small it may seem. Thanks again, it means a lot.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I completely agree, Ben. Each small action leads us towards the bigger change. And remember, it's okay to have a break, to reset, and come back even stronger. Let's stay positive and keep pushing forward. I'm here whenever you need me, my friend.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a conversation in a coffee shop\nParticipants: Benjamin Jackson and Ethan Smith\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Provide emotional support but also avoid enabling victim mentality (Extra information: you believe that your friend needs to face their problems instead of dwelling on them.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Ethan, I have something serious to discuss today. Can we put aside the tech talk for a bit?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Of course, Ben. I'm all ears, what's on your mind?\"\n\nTurn #2: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, I must confess that I've been feeling quite low lately. The constant struggle to protect the environment, knowing that every small action matters... it can be quite overwhelming sometimes. But, at the same time, it feels like my own life is a paradox. My ancestor...they made a fortune out of the very thing I'm trying to combat.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"I understand how you're feeling, Ben. It's a tough cross to bear, but remember that you're not defined by your past or your ancestors, only what you choose to do today. You're taking meaningful action, and every small step counts towards the larger goal. We all face struggles in our journey, but remember - challenges breed resilience. Just continue doing your best as that's all that one can expect of themselves.\"\n\nTurn #4: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I truly appreciate your words, Ethan. They're comforting, like a beacon in this chaotic storm. It's just that...the sheer enormity of it all can make me feel so small and insignicant. It's frustrating to see how deliberately slow the change is happening. We can't afford to take it slow, can we?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"I understand where you're coming from, Ben. And it's true, it doesn't seem as though change is happening quickly enough. But remember: change, especially on a large scale, takes time. It's a marathon, not a sprint. Plus, it's important to manage your expectations. Try not to let the enormity of the situation overwhelm you - focus instead on the actions you can control. Believe me, you're making a difference even if it doesn't feel like it. Don't let this frustration burn you out. Balance is key in all aspects of life, including this one.\"\n\nTurn #6: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thank you, Ethan. Your words really made me reflect on my perspective. Maybe I was trying to do too much at once, forgetting that every drop in the ocean counts. I guess I need to accept that solutions to big problems often require persistence and patience. It's always great to talk to you, you know how to bring clarity. Just expressing my fears and frustrations... it feels like a weight off my shoulders already.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Ben. Remember, slow progress is still progress. And you're already doing so much more than most. Keep going but also remember to take care of yourself. We can always talk whenever you need to. Let's get back to our tech talks next time, maybe it will serve as a good distraction for you as well.\"\n\nTurn #8: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Definitely, Ethan. Light-hearted tech talks could serve as a nice mental breather. It's relieving to know I can count on you anytime. Thank you, really.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith said: \"You're welcome, Ben. Just remember, you're not alone in this. We all have our parts to play in making a change. I'll always be here for a chat whenever you need. And next time, I'll have some cool tech stuff to share!\"\n\nTurn #10: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I'm really looking forward to it, Ethan. Your passion for tech always has a way of brightening up my day. Let's keep doing our parts and believe in the power of change, no matter how small it may seem. Thanks again, it means a lot.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Smith said: \"I completely agree, Ben. Each small action leads us towards the bigger change. And remember, it's okay to have a break, to reset, and come back even stronger. Let's stay positive and keep pushing forward. I'm here whenever you need me, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #12: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thank you, Ethan. I appreciate your patience and your understanding. Let's continue being there for each other, pushing forward, and making this world a better place. Looking forward to our next meeting, my friend.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two ex-lovers at a mutual friend's party\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Liam Johnson\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson \nLeo Williams's goal: Rekindle the romantic relationship (Extra information: You broke up three years ago but now you realize that you miss your ex-lover more than ever)\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Liam, it's been a while. How have you been?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two ex-lovers at a mutual friend's party\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Liam Johnson\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson \nLeo Williams's goal: Rekindle the romantic relationship (Extra information: You broke up three years ago but now you realize that you miss your ex-lover more than ever)\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Liam, it's been a while. How have you been?\"\n\nTurn #1: Liam Johnson said: \"Hey Leo, indeed, it has been a while. I'm holding up well, thank you. How about yourself?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm doing fine too, thank you. I've been spending most of my time at my dental clinic and with my daughter. I've even taken up cooking to spoil her with homemade meals. Have you picked up any new hobbies or activities recently?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two ex-lovers at a mutual friend's party\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Liam Johnson\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson \nLeo Williams's goal: Rekindle the romantic relationship (Extra information: You broke up three years ago but now you realize that you miss your ex-lover more than ever)\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Liam, it's been a while. How have you been?\"\n\nTurn #1: Liam Johnson said: \"Hey Leo, indeed, it has been a while. I'm holding up well, thank you. How about yourself?\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"I'm doing fine too, thank you. I've been spending most of my time at my dental clinic and with my daughter. I've even taken up cooking to spoil her with homemade meals. Have you picked up any new hobbies or activities recently?\"\n\nTurn #3: Liam Johnson said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Leo. I haven't picked up any new hobbies as such. But I have been spending a lot of time with my dog, Rex, and walking him around the neighbourhood. It's peaceful and I enjoy it. It's impressive that you've taken up cooking, I'm sure your daughter enjoys the meals.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's nice to hear, Liam. Cherishing these peaceful moments can be therapeutic, can't they? Rex must be a good company. By the way, you remember the lasagna that we used to cook together? I tried making it over the weekend and it reminded me of our old days. It's funny how certain things can trigger a rush of memories, isn't it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two ex-lovers at a mutual friend's party\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Liam Johnson\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson \nLeo Williams's goal: Rekindle the romantic relationship (Extra information: You broke up three years ago but now you realize that you miss your ex-lover more than ever)\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Liam, it's been a while. How have you been?\"\n\nTurn #1: Liam Johnson said: \"Hey Leo, indeed, it has been a while. I'm holding up well, thank you. How about yourself?\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"I'm doing fine too, thank you. I've been spending most of my time at my dental clinic and with my daughter. I've even taken up cooking to spoil her with homemade meals. Have you picked up any new hobbies or activities recently?\"\n\nTurn #3: Liam Johnson said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Leo. I haven't picked up any new hobbies as such. But I have been spending a lot of time with my dog, Rex, and walking him around the neighbourhood. It's peaceful and I enjoy it. It's impressive that you've taken up cooking, I'm sure your daughter enjoys the meals.\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"That's nice to hear, Liam. Cherishing these peaceful moments can be therapeutic, can't they? Rex must be a good company. By the way, you remember the lasagna that we used to cook together? I tried making it over the weekend and it reminded me of our old days. It's funny how certain things can trigger a rush of memories, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #5: Liam Johnson said: \"Yes, Rex does make good company. And about the lasagna... Yes, I do remember how we used to cook it together. It indeed is interesting how certain things bring back a lot of memories. I hope you and your daughter enjoyed the meal.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Yes, we did. Memories are indeed a powerful thing, they sometimes help us realize what we've lost. Liam, I've been thinking lately... I've missed what we had. I often tell myself that it's only nostalgia talking, but I can't ignore these feelings. I think we had something special and would like to give it another shot, if... you're open to it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two ex-lovers at a mutual friend's party\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Liam Johnson\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson \nLeo Williams's goal: Rekindle the romantic relationship (Extra information: You broke up three years ago but now you realize that you miss your ex-lover more than ever)\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Liam, it's been a while. How have you been?\"\n\nTurn #1: Liam Johnson said: \"Hey Leo, indeed, it has been a while. I'm holding up well, thank you. How about yourself?\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"I'm doing fine too, thank you. I've been spending most of my time at my dental clinic and with my daughter. I've even taken up cooking to spoil her with homemade meals. Have you picked up any new hobbies or activities recently?\"\n\nTurn #3: Liam Johnson said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Leo. I haven't picked up any new hobbies as such. But I have been spending a lot of time with my dog, Rex, and walking him around the neighbourhood. It's peaceful and I enjoy it. It's impressive that you've taken up cooking, I'm sure your daughter enjoys the meals.\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"That's nice to hear, Liam. Cherishing these peaceful moments can be therapeutic, can't they? Rex must be a good company. By the way, you remember the lasagna that we used to cook together? I tried making it over the weekend and it reminded me of our old days. It's funny how certain things can trigger a rush of memories, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #5: Liam Johnson said: \"Yes, Rex does make good company. And about the lasagna... Yes, I do remember how we used to cook it together. It indeed is interesting how certain things bring back a lot of memories. I hope you and your daughter enjoyed the meal.\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"Yes, we did. Memories are indeed a powerful thing, they sometimes help us realize what we've lost. Liam, I've been thinking lately... I've missed what we had. I often tell myself that it's only nostalgia talking, but I can't ignore these feelings. I think we had something special and would like to give it another shot, if... you're open to it?\"\n\nTurn #7: Liam Johnson said: \"Leo, I appreciate your honesty, and I'm not oblivious to the fact that what we had was indeed special. However, lately, I've been feeling more emotionally stable and I'm not sure if I'm ready to make any changes just yet. I hope you understand. Maybe we could take things slow? For now, it's great catching up with you.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I completely understand, Liam. We don't have to rush anything. It's enough for me that you're open to the idea. Let's indeed take this slow and see where it goes. It's nice catching up with you too.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two ex-lovers at a mutual friend's party\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Liam Johnson\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson \nLeo Williams's goal: Rekindle the romantic relationship (Extra information: You broke up three years ago but now you realize that you miss your ex-lover more than ever)\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Liam, it's been a while. How have you been?\"\n\nTurn #1: Liam Johnson said: \"Hey Leo, indeed, it has been a while. I'm holding up well, thank you. How about yourself?\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"I'm doing fine too, thank you. I've been spending most of my time at my dental clinic and with my daughter. I've even taken up cooking to spoil her with homemade meals. Have you picked up any new hobbies or activities recently?\"\n\nTurn #3: Liam Johnson said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Leo. I haven't picked up any new hobbies as such. But I have been spending a lot of time with my dog, Rex, and walking him around the neighbourhood. It's peaceful and I enjoy it. It's impressive that you've taken up cooking, I'm sure your daughter enjoys the meals.\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"That's nice to hear, Liam. Cherishing these peaceful moments can be therapeutic, can't they? Rex must be a good company. By the way, you remember the lasagna that we used to cook together? I tried making it over the weekend and it reminded me of our old days. It's funny how certain things can trigger a rush of memories, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #5: Liam Johnson said: \"Yes, Rex does make good company. And about the lasagna... Yes, I do remember how we used to cook it together. It indeed is interesting how certain things bring back a lot of memories. I hope you and your daughter enjoyed the meal.\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"Yes, we did. Memories are indeed a powerful thing, they sometimes help us realize what we've lost. Liam, I've been thinking lately... I've missed what we had. I often tell myself that it's only nostalgia talking, but I can't ignore these feelings. I think we had something special and would like to give it another shot, if... you're open to it?\"\n\nTurn #7: Liam Johnson said: \"Leo, I appreciate your honesty, and I'm not oblivious to the fact that what we had was indeed special. However, lately, I've been feeling more emotionally stable and I'm not sure if I'm ready to make any changes just yet. I hope you understand. Maybe we could take things slow? For now, it's great catching up with you.\"\n\nTurn #8: Leo Williams said: \"I completely understand, Liam. We don't have to rush anything. It's enough for me that you're open to the idea. Let's indeed take this slow and see where it goes. It's nice catching up with you too.\"\n\nTurn #9: Liam Johnson said: \"That sounds like a good plan, Leo. Let's see where life leads us. And don't worry about the lasagna, you always had the secret ingredient, not me. Let's catch up more as the evening goes on.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad to hear that, Liam. For the lasagna, yeah, I had the secret ingredient but you were always the best at execution, a perfect team, weren't we? Let's continue to catch up throughout the evening and see where the road leads us. And yes, I'd look forward to cooking that lasagna together again someday.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two ex-lovers at a mutual friend's party\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Liam Johnson\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson \nLeo Williams's goal: Rekindle the romantic relationship (Extra information: You broke up three years ago but now you realize that you miss your ex-lover more than ever)\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Liam, it's been a while. How have you been?\"\n\nTurn #1: Liam Johnson said: \"Hey Leo, indeed, it has been a while. I'm holding up well, thank you. How about yourself?\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"I'm doing fine too, thank you. I've been spending most of my time at my dental clinic and with my daughter. I've even taken up cooking to spoil her with homemade meals. Have you picked up any new hobbies or activities recently?\"\n\nTurn #3: Liam Johnson said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Leo. I haven't picked up any new hobbies as such. But I have been spending a lot of time with my dog, Rex, and walking him around the neighbourhood. It's peaceful and I enjoy it. It's impressive that you've taken up cooking, I'm sure your daughter enjoys the meals.\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"That's nice to hear, Liam. Cherishing these peaceful moments can be therapeutic, can't they? Rex must be a good company. By the way, you remember the lasagna that we used to cook together? I tried making it over the weekend and it reminded me of our old days. It's funny how certain things can trigger a rush of memories, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #5: Liam Johnson said: \"Yes, Rex does make good company. And about the lasagna... Yes, I do remember how we used to cook it together. It indeed is interesting how certain things bring back a lot of memories. I hope you and your daughter enjoyed the meal.\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"Yes, we did. Memories are indeed a powerful thing, they sometimes help us realize what we've lost. Liam, I've been thinking lately... I've missed what we had. I often tell myself that it's only nostalgia talking, but I can't ignore these feelings. I think we had something special and would like to give it another shot, if... you're open to it?\"\n\nTurn #7: Liam Johnson said: \"Leo, I appreciate your honesty, and I'm not oblivious to the fact that what we had was indeed special. However, lately, I've been feeling more emotionally stable and I'm not sure if I'm ready to make any changes just yet. I hope you understand. Maybe we could take things slow? For now, it's great catching up with you.\"\n\nTurn #8: Leo Williams said: \"I completely understand, Liam. We don't have to rush anything. It's enough for me that you're open to the idea. Let's indeed take this slow and see where it goes. It's nice catching up with you too.\"\n\nTurn #9: Liam Johnson said: \"That sounds like a good plan, Leo. Let's see where life leads us. And don't worry about the lasagna, you always had the secret ingredient, not me. Let's catch up more as the evening goes on.\"\n\nTurn #10: Leo Williams said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Liam. For the lasagna, yeah, I had the secret ingredient but you were always the best at execution, a perfect team, weren't we? Let's continue to catch up throughout the evening and see where the road leads us. And yes, I'd look forward to cooking that lasagna together again someday.\"\n\nTurn #11: Liam Johnson said: \"Definitely, we made a great team back then, Leo. Time does change many things, huh? And sure, maybe someday we can cook lasagna together again. Let's continue enjoying the party, shall we?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Liam. Time does change indeed. But it also gives us a chance to revisit things in a new light, doesn't it? Let's enjoy the rest of the party, and yes, look forward to sharing that lasagna again. It was good catching up with you.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two ex-lovers at a mutual friend's party\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Liam Johnson\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson \nLeo Williams's goal: Rekindle the romantic relationship (Extra information: You broke up three years ago but now you realize that you miss your ex-lover more than ever)\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Liam, it's been a while. How have you been?\"\n\nTurn #1: Liam Johnson said: \"Hey Leo, indeed, it has been a while. I'm holding up well, thank you. How about yourself?\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"I'm doing fine too, thank you. I've been spending most of my time at my dental clinic and with my daughter. I've even taken up cooking to spoil her with homemade meals. Have you picked up any new hobbies or activities recently?\"\n\nTurn #3: Liam Johnson said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Leo. I haven't picked up any new hobbies as such. But I have been spending a lot of time with my dog, Rex, and walking him around the neighbourhood. It's peaceful and I enjoy it. It's impressive that you've taken up cooking, I'm sure your daughter enjoys the meals.\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"That's nice to hear, Liam. Cherishing these peaceful moments can be therapeutic, can't they? Rex must be a good company. By the way, you remember the lasagna that we used to cook together? I tried making it over the weekend and it reminded me of our old days. It's funny how certain things can trigger a rush of memories, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #5: Liam Johnson said: \"Yes, Rex does make good company. And about the lasagna... Yes, I do remember how we used to cook it together. It indeed is interesting how certain things bring back a lot of memories. I hope you and your daughter enjoyed the meal.\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"Yes, we did. Memories are indeed a powerful thing, they sometimes help us realize what we've lost. Liam, I've been thinking lately... I've missed what we had. I often tell myself that it's only nostalgia talking, but I can't ignore these feelings. I think we had something special and would like to give it another shot, if... you're open to it?\"\n\nTurn #7: Liam Johnson said: \"Leo, I appreciate your honesty, and I'm not oblivious to the fact that what we had was indeed special. However, lately, I've been feeling more emotionally stable and I'm not sure if I'm ready to make any changes just yet. I hope you understand. Maybe we could take things slow? For now, it's great catching up with you.\"\n\nTurn #8: Leo Williams said: \"I completely understand, Liam. We don't have to rush anything. It's enough for me that you're open to the idea. Let's indeed take this slow and see where it goes. It's nice catching up with you too.\"\n\nTurn #9: Liam Johnson said: \"That sounds like a good plan, Leo. Let's see where life leads us. And don't worry about the lasagna, you always had the secret ingredient, not me. Let's catch up more as the evening goes on.\"\n\nTurn #10: Leo Williams said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Liam. For the lasagna, yeah, I had the secret ingredient but you were always the best at execution, a perfect team, weren't we? Let's continue to catch up throughout the evening and see where the road leads us. And yes, I'd look forward to cooking that lasagna together again someday.\"\n\nTurn #11: Liam Johnson said: \"Definitely, we made a great team back then, Leo. Time does change many things, huh? And sure, maybe someday we can cook lasagna together again. Let's continue enjoying the party, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #12: Leo Williams said: \"Absolutely, Liam. Time does change indeed. But it also gives us a chance to revisit things in a new light, doesn't it? Let's enjoy the rest of the party, and yes, look forward to sharing that lasagna again. It was good catching up with you.\"\n\nTurn #13: Liam Johnson said: \"Yes, indeed Leo. Life has a fascinating way of working out. It's always a pleasure catching up with you. Let's enjoy this party and see what the future holds. About that lasagna, we could definitely work on it someday. Cheers!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Cheers to that, Liam! Let\u2019s indeed enjoy the party and cherish the moment. Excuse me for a moment, my daughter probably needs me. But we'll catch up soon.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two ex-lovers at a mutual friend's party\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Liam Johnson\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson \nLeo Williams's goal: Rekindle the romantic relationship (Extra information: You broke up three years ago but now you realize that you miss your ex-lover more than ever)\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Liam, it's been a while. How have you been?\"\n\nTurn #1: Liam Johnson said: \"Hey Leo, indeed, it has been a while. I'm holding up well, thank you. How about yourself?\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"I'm doing fine too, thank you. I've been spending most of my time at my dental clinic and with my daughter. I've even taken up cooking to spoil her with homemade meals. Have you picked up any new hobbies or activities recently?\"\n\nTurn #3: Liam Johnson said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Leo. I haven't picked up any new hobbies as such. But I have been spending a lot of time with my dog, Rex, and walking him around the neighbourhood. It's peaceful and I enjoy it. It's impressive that you've taken up cooking, I'm sure your daughter enjoys the meals.\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"That's nice to hear, Liam. Cherishing these peaceful moments can be therapeutic, can't they? Rex must be a good company. By the way, you remember the lasagna that we used to cook together? I tried making it over the weekend and it reminded me of our old days. It's funny how certain things can trigger a rush of memories, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #5: Liam Johnson said: \"Yes, Rex does make good company. And about the lasagna... Yes, I do remember how we used to cook it together. It indeed is interesting how certain things bring back a lot of memories. I hope you and your daughter enjoyed the meal.\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"Yes, we did. Memories are indeed a powerful thing, they sometimes help us realize what we've lost. Liam, I've been thinking lately... I've missed what we had. I often tell myself that it's only nostalgia talking, but I can't ignore these feelings. I think we had something special and would like to give it another shot, if... you're open to it?\"\n\nTurn #7: Liam Johnson said: \"Leo, I appreciate your honesty, and I'm not oblivious to the fact that what we had was indeed special. However, lately, I've been feeling more emotionally stable and I'm not sure if I'm ready to make any changes just yet. I hope you understand. Maybe we could take things slow? For now, it's great catching up with you.\"\n\nTurn #8: Leo Williams said: \"I completely understand, Liam. We don't have to rush anything. It's enough for me that you're open to the idea. Let's indeed take this slow and see where it goes. It's nice catching up with you too.\"\n\nTurn #9: Liam Johnson said: \"That sounds like a good plan, Leo. Let's see where life leads us. And don't worry about the lasagna, you always had the secret ingredient, not me. Let's catch up more as the evening goes on.\"\n\nTurn #10: Leo Williams said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Liam. For the lasagna, yeah, I had the secret ingredient but you were always the best at execution, a perfect team, weren't we? Let's continue to catch up throughout the evening and see where the road leads us. And yes, I'd look forward to cooking that lasagna together again someday.\"\n\nTurn #11: Liam Johnson said: \"Definitely, we made a great team back then, Leo. Time does change many things, huh? And sure, maybe someday we can cook lasagna together again. Let's continue enjoying the party, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #12: Leo Williams said: \"Absolutely, Liam. Time does change indeed. But it also gives us a chance to revisit things in a new light, doesn't it? Let's enjoy the rest of the party, and yes, look forward to sharing that lasagna again. It was good catching up with you.\"\n\nTurn #13: Liam Johnson said: \"Yes, indeed Leo. Life has a fascinating way of working out. It's always a pleasure catching up with you. Let's enjoy this party and see what the future holds. About that lasagna, we could definitely work on it someday. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #14: Leo Williams said: \"Cheers to that, Liam! Let\u2019s indeed enjoy the party and cherish the moment. Excuse me for a moment, my daughter probably needs me. But we'll catch up soon.\"\n\nTurn #15: Liam Johnson said: \"Absolutely, take care of your daughter, Leo. We'll certainly catch up more later. Have a good time.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two ex-lovers at a mutual friend's party\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Liam Johnson\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams \nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nLiam Johnson's goal: Maintain emotional stability while considering the possibility of rekindling the relationship (Extra information: You have recently started feeling emotionally stable after the breakup and you don't want to rush into anything that might disturb that stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Liam, it's been a while. How have you been?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Leo, indeed, it has been a while. I'm holding up well, thank you. How about yourself?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two ex-lovers at a mutual friend's party\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Liam Johnson\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams \nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nLiam Johnson's goal: Maintain emotional stability while considering the possibility of rekindling the relationship (Extra information: You have recently started feeling emotionally stable after the breakup and you don't want to rush into anything that might disturb that stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Liam, it's been a while. How have you been?\"\n\nTurn #1: Liam Johnson said: \"Hey Leo, indeed, it has been a while. I'm holding up well, thank you. How about yourself?\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"I'm doing fine too, thank you. I've been spending most of my time at my dental clinic and with my daughter. I've even taken up cooking to spoil her with homemade meals. Have you picked up any new hobbies or activities recently?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad to hear that, Leo. I haven't picked up any new hobbies as such. But I have been spending a lot of time with my dog, Rex, and walking him around the neighbourhood. It's peaceful and I enjoy it. It's impressive that you've taken up cooking, I'm sure your daughter enjoys the meals.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two ex-lovers at a mutual friend's party\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Liam Johnson\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams \nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nLiam Johnson's goal: Maintain emotional stability while considering the possibility of rekindling the relationship (Extra information: You have recently started feeling emotionally stable after the breakup and you don't want to rush into anything that might disturb that stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Liam, it's been a while. How have you been?\"\n\nTurn #1: Liam Johnson said: \"Hey Leo, indeed, it has been a while. I'm holding up well, thank you. How about yourself?\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"I'm doing fine too, thank you. I've been spending most of my time at my dental clinic and with my daughter. I've even taken up cooking to spoil her with homemade meals. Have you picked up any new hobbies or activities recently?\"\n\nTurn #3: Liam Johnson said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Leo. I haven't picked up any new hobbies as such. But I have been spending a lot of time with my dog, Rex, and walking him around the neighbourhood. It's peaceful and I enjoy it. It's impressive that you've taken up cooking, I'm sure your daughter enjoys the meals.\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"That's nice to hear, Liam. Cherishing these peaceful moments can be therapeutic, can't they? Rex must be a good company. By the way, you remember the lasagna that we used to cook together? I tried making it over the weekend and it reminded me of our old days. It's funny how certain things can trigger a rush of memories, isn't it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Yes, Rex does make good company. And about the lasagna... Yes, I do remember how we used to cook it together. It indeed is interesting how certain things bring back a lot of memories. I hope you and your daughter enjoyed the meal.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two ex-lovers at a mutual friend's party\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Liam Johnson\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams \nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nLiam Johnson's goal: Maintain emotional stability while considering the possibility of rekindling the relationship (Extra information: You have recently started feeling emotionally stable after the breakup and you don't want to rush into anything that might disturb that stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Liam, it's been a while. How have you been?\"\n\nTurn #1: Liam Johnson said: \"Hey Leo, indeed, it has been a while. I'm holding up well, thank you. How about yourself?\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"I'm doing fine too, thank you. I've been spending most of my time at my dental clinic and with my daughter. I've even taken up cooking to spoil her with homemade meals. Have you picked up any new hobbies or activities recently?\"\n\nTurn #3: Liam Johnson said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Leo. I haven't picked up any new hobbies as such. But I have been spending a lot of time with my dog, Rex, and walking him around the neighbourhood. It's peaceful and I enjoy it. It's impressive that you've taken up cooking, I'm sure your daughter enjoys the meals.\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"That's nice to hear, Liam. Cherishing these peaceful moments can be therapeutic, can't they? Rex must be a good company. By the way, you remember the lasagna that we used to cook together? I tried making it over the weekend and it reminded me of our old days. It's funny how certain things can trigger a rush of memories, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #5: Liam Johnson said: \"Yes, Rex does make good company. And about the lasagna... Yes, I do remember how we used to cook it together. It indeed is interesting how certain things bring back a lot of memories. I hope you and your daughter enjoyed the meal.\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"Yes, we did. Memories are indeed a powerful thing, they sometimes help us realize what we've lost. Liam, I've been thinking lately... I've missed what we had. I often tell myself that it's only nostalgia talking, but I can't ignore these feelings. I think we had something special and would like to give it another shot, if... you're open to it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Leo, I appreciate your honesty, and I'm not oblivious to the fact that what we had was indeed special. However, lately, I've been feeling more emotionally stable and I'm not sure if I'm ready to make any changes just yet. I hope you understand. Maybe we could take things slow? For now, it's great catching up with you.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two ex-lovers at a mutual friend's party\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Liam Johnson\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams \nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nLiam Johnson's goal: Maintain emotional stability while considering the possibility of rekindling the relationship (Extra information: You have recently started feeling emotionally stable after the breakup and you don't want to rush into anything that might disturb that stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Liam, it's been a while. How have you been?\"\n\nTurn #1: Liam Johnson said: \"Hey Leo, indeed, it has been a while. I'm holding up well, thank you. How about yourself?\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"I'm doing fine too, thank you. I've been spending most of my time at my dental clinic and with my daughter. I've even taken up cooking to spoil her with homemade meals. Have you picked up any new hobbies or activities recently?\"\n\nTurn #3: Liam Johnson said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Leo. I haven't picked up any new hobbies as such. But I have been spending a lot of time with my dog, Rex, and walking him around the neighbourhood. It's peaceful and I enjoy it. It's impressive that you've taken up cooking, I'm sure your daughter enjoys the meals.\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"That's nice to hear, Liam. Cherishing these peaceful moments can be therapeutic, can't they? Rex must be a good company. By the way, you remember the lasagna that we used to cook together? I tried making it over the weekend and it reminded me of our old days. It's funny how certain things can trigger a rush of memories, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #5: Liam Johnson said: \"Yes, Rex does make good company. And about the lasagna... Yes, I do remember how we used to cook it together. It indeed is interesting how certain things bring back a lot of memories. I hope you and your daughter enjoyed the meal.\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"Yes, we did. Memories are indeed a powerful thing, they sometimes help us realize what we've lost. Liam, I've been thinking lately... I've missed what we had. I often tell myself that it's only nostalgia talking, but I can't ignore these feelings. I think we had something special and would like to give it another shot, if... you're open to it?\"\n\nTurn #7: Liam Johnson said: \"Leo, I appreciate your honesty, and I'm not oblivious to the fact that what we had was indeed special. However, lately, I've been feeling more emotionally stable and I'm not sure if I'm ready to make any changes just yet. I hope you understand. Maybe we could take things slow? For now, it's great catching up with you.\"\n\nTurn #8: Leo Williams said: \"I completely understand, Liam. We don't have to rush anything. It's enough for me that you're open to the idea. Let's indeed take this slow and see where it goes. It's nice catching up with you too.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds like a good plan, Leo. Let's see where life leads us. And don't worry about the lasagna, you always had the secret ingredient, not me. Let's catch up more as the evening goes on.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two ex-lovers at a mutual friend's party\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Liam Johnson\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams \nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nLiam Johnson's goal: Maintain emotional stability while considering the possibility of rekindling the relationship (Extra information: You have recently started feeling emotionally stable after the breakup and you don't want to rush into anything that might disturb that stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Liam, it's been a while. How have you been?\"\n\nTurn #1: Liam Johnson said: \"Hey Leo, indeed, it has been a while. I'm holding up well, thank you. How about yourself?\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"I'm doing fine too, thank you. I've been spending most of my time at my dental clinic and with my daughter. I've even taken up cooking to spoil her with homemade meals. Have you picked up any new hobbies or activities recently?\"\n\nTurn #3: Liam Johnson said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Leo. I haven't picked up any new hobbies as such. But I have been spending a lot of time with my dog, Rex, and walking him around the neighbourhood. It's peaceful and I enjoy it. It's impressive that you've taken up cooking, I'm sure your daughter enjoys the meals.\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"That's nice to hear, Liam. Cherishing these peaceful moments can be therapeutic, can't they? Rex must be a good company. By the way, you remember the lasagna that we used to cook together? I tried making it over the weekend and it reminded me of our old days. It's funny how certain things can trigger a rush of memories, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #5: Liam Johnson said: \"Yes, Rex does make good company. And about the lasagna... Yes, I do remember how we used to cook it together. It indeed is interesting how certain things bring back a lot of memories. I hope you and your daughter enjoyed the meal.\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"Yes, we did. Memories are indeed a powerful thing, they sometimes help us realize what we've lost. Liam, I've been thinking lately... I've missed what we had. I often tell myself that it's only nostalgia talking, but I can't ignore these feelings. I think we had something special and would like to give it another shot, if... you're open to it?\"\n\nTurn #7: Liam Johnson said: \"Leo, I appreciate your honesty, and I'm not oblivious to the fact that what we had was indeed special. However, lately, I've been feeling more emotionally stable and I'm not sure if I'm ready to make any changes just yet. I hope you understand. Maybe we could take things slow? For now, it's great catching up with you.\"\n\nTurn #8: Leo Williams said: \"I completely understand, Liam. We don't have to rush anything. It's enough for me that you're open to the idea. Let's indeed take this slow and see where it goes. It's nice catching up with you too.\"\n\nTurn #9: Liam Johnson said: \"That sounds like a good plan, Leo. Let's see where life leads us. And don't worry about the lasagna, you always had the secret ingredient, not me. Let's catch up more as the evening goes on.\"\n\nTurn #10: Leo Williams said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Liam. For the lasagna, yeah, I had the secret ingredient but you were always the best at execution, a perfect team, weren't we? Let's continue to catch up throughout the evening and see where the road leads us. And yes, I'd look forward to cooking that lasagna together again someday.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Definitely, we made a great team back then, Leo. Time does change many things, huh? And sure, maybe someday we can cook lasagna together again. Let's continue enjoying the party, shall we?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two ex-lovers at a mutual friend's party\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Liam Johnson\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams \nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nLiam Johnson's goal: Maintain emotional stability while considering the possibility of rekindling the relationship (Extra information: You have recently started feeling emotionally stable after the breakup and you don't want to rush into anything that might disturb that stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Liam, it's been a while. How have you been?\"\n\nTurn #1: Liam Johnson said: \"Hey Leo, indeed, it has been a while. I'm holding up well, thank you. How about yourself?\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"I'm doing fine too, thank you. I've been spending most of my time at my dental clinic and with my daughter. I've even taken up cooking to spoil her with homemade meals. Have you picked up any new hobbies or activities recently?\"\n\nTurn #3: Liam Johnson said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Leo. I haven't picked up any new hobbies as such. But I have been spending a lot of time with my dog, Rex, and walking him around the neighbourhood. It's peaceful and I enjoy it. It's impressive that you've taken up cooking, I'm sure your daughter enjoys the meals.\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"That's nice to hear, Liam. Cherishing these peaceful moments can be therapeutic, can't they? Rex must be a good company. By the way, you remember the lasagna that we used to cook together? I tried making it over the weekend and it reminded me of our old days. It's funny how certain things can trigger a rush of memories, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #5: Liam Johnson said: \"Yes, Rex does make good company. And about the lasagna... Yes, I do remember how we used to cook it together. It indeed is interesting how certain things bring back a lot of memories. I hope you and your daughter enjoyed the meal.\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"Yes, we did. Memories are indeed a powerful thing, they sometimes help us realize what we've lost. Liam, I've been thinking lately... I've missed what we had. I often tell myself that it's only nostalgia talking, but I can't ignore these feelings. I think we had something special and would like to give it another shot, if... you're open to it?\"\n\nTurn #7: Liam Johnson said: \"Leo, I appreciate your honesty, and I'm not oblivious to the fact that what we had was indeed special. However, lately, I've been feeling more emotionally stable and I'm not sure if I'm ready to make any changes just yet. I hope you understand. Maybe we could take things slow? For now, it's great catching up with you.\"\n\nTurn #8: Leo Williams said: \"I completely understand, Liam. We don't have to rush anything. It's enough for me that you're open to the idea. Let's indeed take this slow and see where it goes. It's nice catching up with you too.\"\n\nTurn #9: Liam Johnson said: \"That sounds like a good plan, Leo. Let's see where life leads us. And don't worry about the lasagna, you always had the secret ingredient, not me. Let's catch up more as the evening goes on.\"\n\nTurn #10: Leo Williams said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Liam. For the lasagna, yeah, I had the secret ingredient but you were always the best at execution, a perfect team, weren't we? Let's continue to catch up throughout the evening and see where the road leads us. And yes, I'd look forward to cooking that lasagna together again someday.\"\n\nTurn #11: Liam Johnson said: \"Definitely, we made a great team back then, Leo. Time does change many things, huh? And sure, maybe someday we can cook lasagna together again. Let's continue enjoying the party, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #12: Leo Williams said: \"Absolutely, Liam. Time does change indeed. But it also gives us a chance to revisit things in a new light, doesn't it? Let's enjoy the rest of the party, and yes, look forward to sharing that lasagna again. It was good catching up with you.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Yes, indeed Leo. Life has a fascinating way of working out. It's always a pleasure catching up with you. Let's enjoy this party and see what the future holds. About that lasagna, we could definitely work on it someday. Cheers!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two ex-lovers at a mutual friend's party\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Liam Johnson\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams \nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nLiam Johnson's goal: Maintain emotional stability while considering the possibility of rekindling the relationship (Extra information: You have recently started feeling emotionally stable after the breakup and you don't want to rush into anything that might disturb that stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Liam, it's been a while. How have you been?\"\n\nTurn #1: Liam Johnson said: \"Hey Leo, indeed, it has been a while. I'm holding up well, thank you. How about yourself?\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"I'm doing fine too, thank you. I've been spending most of my time at my dental clinic and with my daughter. I've even taken up cooking to spoil her with homemade meals. Have you picked up any new hobbies or activities recently?\"\n\nTurn #3: Liam Johnson said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Leo. I haven't picked up any new hobbies as such. But I have been spending a lot of time with my dog, Rex, and walking him around the neighbourhood. It's peaceful and I enjoy it. It's impressive that you've taken up cooking, I'm sure your daughter enjoys the meals.\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"That's nice to hear, Liam. Cherishing these peaceful moments can be therapeutic, can't they? Rex must be a good company. By the way, you remember the lasagna that we used to cook together? I tried making it over the weekend and it reminded me of our old days. It's funny how certain things can trigger a rush of memories, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #5: Liam Johnson said: \"Yes, Rex does make good company. And about the lasagna... Yes, I do remember how we used to cook it together. It indeed is interesting how certain things bring back a lot of memories. I hope you and your daughter enjoyed the meal.\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"Yes, we did. Memories are indeed a powerful thing, they sometimes help us realize what we've lost. Liam, I've been thinking lately... I've missed what we had. I often tell myself that it's only nostalgia talking, but I can't ignore these feelings. I think we had something special and would like to give it another shot, if... you're open to it?\"\n\nTurn #7: Liam Johnson said: \"Leo, I appreciate your honesty, and I'm not oblivious to the fact that what we had was indeed special. However, lately, I've been feeling more emotionally stable and I'm not sure if I'm ready to make any changes just yet. I hope you understand. Maybe we could take things slow? For now, it's great catching up with you.\"\n\nTurn #8: Leo Williams said: \"I completely understand, Liam. We don't have to rush anything. It's enough for me that you're open to the idea. Let's indeed take this slow and see where it goes. It's nice catching up with you too.\"\n\nTurn #9: Liam Johnson said: \"That sounds like a good plan, Leo. Let's see where life leads us. And don't worry about the lasagna, you always had the secret ingredient, not me. Let's catch up more as the evening goes on.\"\n\nTurn #10: Leo Williams said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Liam. For the lasagna, yeah, I had the secret ingredient but you were always the best at execution, a perfect team, weren't we? Let's continue to catch up throughout the evening and see where the road leads us. And yes, I'd look forward to cooking that lasagna together again someday.\"\n\nTurn #11: Liam Johnson said: \"Definitely, we made a great team back then, Leo. Time does change many things, huh? And sure, maybe someday we can cook lasagna together again. Let's continue enjoying the party, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #12: Leo Williams said: \"Absolutely, Liam. Time does change indeed. But it also gives us a chance to revisit things in a new light, doesn't it? Let's enjoy the rest of the party, and yes, look forward to sharing that lasagna again. It was good catching up with you.\"\n\nTurn #13: Liam Johnson said: \"Yes, indeed Leo. Life has a fascinating way of working out. It's always a pleasure catching up with you. Let's enjoy this party and see what the future holds. About that lasagna, we could definitely work on it someday. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #14: Leo Williams said: \"Cheers to that, Liam! Let\u2019s indeed enjoy the party and cherish the moment. Excuse me for a moment, my daughter probably needs me. But we'll catch up soon.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, take care of your daughter, Leo. We'll certainly catch up more later. Have a good time.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two ex-lovers at a mutual friend's party\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Liam Johnson\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams \nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nLiam Johnson's goal: Maintain emotional stability while considering the possibility of rekindling the relationship (Extra information: You have recently started feeling emotionally stable after the breakup and you don't want to rush into anything that might disturb that stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Liam, it's been a while. How have you been?\"\n\nTurn #1: Liam Johnson said: \"Hey Leo, indeed, it has been a while. I'm holding up well, thank you. How about yourself?\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"I'm doing fine too, thank you. I've been spending most of my time at my dental clinic and with my daughter. I've even taken up cooking to spoil her with homemade meals. Have you picked up any new hobbies or activities recently?\"\n\nTurn #3: Liam Johnson said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Leo. I haven't picked up any new hobbies as such. But I have been spending a lot of time with my dog, Rex, and walking him around the neighbourhood. It's peaceful and I enjoy it. It's impressive that you've taken up cooking, I'm sure your daughter enjoys the meals.\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"That's nice to hear, Liam. Cherishing these peaceful moments can be therapeutic, can't they? Rex must be a good company. By the way, you remember the lasagna that we used to cook together? I tried making it over the weekend and it reminded me of our old days. It's funny how certain things can trigger a rush of memories, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #5: Liam Johnson said: \"Yes, Rex does make good company. And about the lasagna... Yes, I do remember how we used to cook it together. It indeed is interesting how certain things bring back a lot of memories. I hope you and your daughter enjoyed the meal.\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"Yes, we did. Memories are indeed a powerful thing, they sometimes help us realize what we've lost. Liam, I've been thinking lately... I've missed what we had. I often tell myself that it's only nostalgia talking, but I can't ignore these feelings. I think we had something special and would like to give it another shot, if... you're open to it?\"\n\nTurn #7: Liam Johnson said: \"Leo, I appreciate your honesty, and I'm not oblivious to the fact that what we had was indeed special. However, lately, I've been feeling more emotionally stable and I'm not sure if I'm ready to make any changes just yet. I hope you understand. Maybe we could take things slow? For now, it's great catching up with you.\"\n\nTurn #8: Leo Williams said: \"I completely understand, Liam. We don't have to rush anything. It's enough for me that you're open to the idea. Let's indeed take this slow and see where it goes. It's nice catching up with you too.\"\n\nTurn #9: Liam Johnson said: \"That sounds like a good plan, Leo. Let's see where life leads us. And don't worry about the lasagna, you always had the secret ingredient, not me. Let's catch up more as the evening goes on.\"\n\nTurn #10: Leo Williams said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Liam. For the lasagna, yeah, I had the secret ingredient but you were always the best at execution, a perfect team, weren't we? Let's continue to catch up throughout the evening and see where the road leads us. And yes, I'd look forward to cooking that lasagna together again someday.\"\n\nTurn #11: Liam Johnson said: \"Definitely, we made a great team back then, Leo. Time does change many things, huh? And sure, maybe someday we can cook lasagna together again. Let's continue enjoying the party, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #12: Leo Williams said: \"Absolutely, Liam. Time does change indeed. But it also gives us a chance to revisit things in a new light, doesn't it? Let's enjoy the rest of the party, and yes, look forward to sharing that lasagna again. It was good catching up with you.\"\n\nTurn #13: Liam Johnson said: \"Yes, indeed Leo. Life has a fascinating way of working out. It's always a pleasure catching up with you. Let's enjoy this party and see what the future holds. About that lasagna, we could definitely work on it someday. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #14: Leo Williams said: \"Cheers to that, Liam! Let\u2019s indeed enjoy the party and cherish the moment. Excuse me for a moment, my daughter probably needs me. But we'll catch up soon.\"\n\nTurn #15: Liam Johnson said: \"Absolutely, take care of your daughter, Leo. We'll certainly catch up more later. Have a good time.\"\n\nTurn #16: Leo Williams left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends discussing their schedules at a coffee shop\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nLeo Williams's goal: Convince the friend to take more classes (Extra information: you think your friend is not challenging themselves enough)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Hendrick, how's your schedule been? You ever think about taking any new cooking classes or exploring new cuisines?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends discussing their schedules at a coffee shop\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nLeo Williams's goal: Convince the friend to take more classes (Extra information: you think your friend is not challenging themselves enough)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Hendrick, how's your schedule been? You ever think about taking any new cooking classes or exploring new cuisines?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Eh, Leo, my friend, you know I always love exploring new things especially in food! But honestly, lately, I've felt a bit overwhelmed with work. I love our wine tasting nights, but adding more cooking classes or cuisines might be a bit too much right now. Maybe I could suggest that we try out a new restaurant or food spot instead? That way, we can still experience new cuisines without the extra stress. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I understand Hendrick, your plate does seem full. Still, think about this for a second. Your creativity in the kitchen has always been astonishing but there's always room to grow and new things to learn. Maybe you could consider some sort of weekend or online class that won\u2019t take up much extra time? What's more, it could offer you fresh inspiration for our wine tasting night. You're great, buddy, but I believe there's still more within you I wouldn\u2019t want you to miss out on. What do you say?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends discussing their schedules at a coffee shop\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nLeo Williams's goal: Convince the friend to take more classes (Extra information: you think your friend is not challenging themselves enough)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Hendrick, how's your schedule been? You ever think about taking any new cooking classes or exploring new cuisines?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Eh, Leo, my friend, you know I always love exploring new things especially in food! But honestly, lately, I've felt a bit overwhelmed with work. I love our wine tasting nights, but adding more cooking classes or cuisines might be a bit too much right now. Maybe I could suggest that we try out a new restaurant or food spot instead? That way, we can still experience new cuisines without the extra stress. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"I understand Hendrick, your plate does seem full. Still, think about this for a second. Your creativity in the kitchen has always been astonishing but there's always room to grow and new things to learn. Maybe you could consider some sort of weekend or online class that won\u2019t take up much extra time? What's more, it could offer you fresh inspiration for our wine tasting night. You're great, buddy, but I believe there's still more within you I wouldn\u2019t want you to miss out on. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Leo, I appreciate your faith in me, mate. You're right about constant growing & learning - it's what keeps us lively! However, these days I'm focusing on perfecting what I already know rather than jumping into something new. Let's agree to explore new cuisines but in a different way - we can visit new culinary places or try out some food festivals to gather fresh inspiration. That can blend in perfectly well with our schedule, what do you say?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I respect that, Hendrick. Perfecting your skills is also a way of growth. As a friend, I just don't want you to limit yourself. Trying out new culinary places and food festivals sounds like a decent idea for exploring different cuisines, too. How about this? We start by exploring new cuisines this way, meanwhile, keep an eye for something that you might love to learn more deeply and consider taking up a course on it, only if you feel it's not overwhelming. I believe that should strike a good balance. How does that sound?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends discussing their schedules at a coffee shop\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nLeo Williams's goal: Convince the friend to take more classes (Extra information: you think your friend is not challenging themselves enough)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Hendrick, how's your schedule been? You ever think about taking any new cooking classes or exploring new cuisines?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Eh, Leo, my friend, you know I always love exploring new things especially in food! But honestly, lately, I've felt a bit overwhelmed with work. I love our wine tasting nights, but adding more cooking classes or cuisines might be a bit too much right now. Maybe I could suggest that we try out a new restaurant or food spot instead? That way, we can still experience new cuisines without the extra stress. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"I understand Hendrick, your plate does seem full. Still, think about this for a second. Your creativity in the kitchen has always been astonishing but there's always room to grow and new things to learn. Maybe you could consider some sort of weekend or online class that won\u2019t take up much extra time? What's more, it could offer you fresh inspiration for our wine tasting night. You're great, buddy, but I believe there's still more within you I wouldn\u2019t want you to miss out on. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Leo, I appreciate your faith in me, mate. You're right about constant growing & learning - it's what keeps us lively! However, these days I'm focusing on perfecting what I already know rather than jumping into something new. Let's agree to explore new cuisines but in a different way - we can visit new culinary places or try out some food festivals to gather fresh inspiration. That can blend in perfectly well with our schedule, what do you say?\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"I respect that, Hendrick. Perfecting your skills is also a way of growth. As a friend, I just don't want you to limit yourself. Trying out new culinary places and food festivals sounds like a decent idea for exploring different cuisines, too. How about this? We start by exploring new cuisines this way, meanwhile, keep an eye for something that you might love to learn more deeply and consider taking up a course on it, only if you feel it's not overwhelming. I believe that should strike a good balance. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Leo, that's a thoughtful approach! I completely agree. We'll keep it low-key, simply enjoying new cuisines, and if something truly catches my eye and intrigues me, I will consider taking a deeper dive. And don't worry, I've never been one to limit myself, just need to balance it all. Cheers to new culinary adventures, my friend!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad you're open to that idea, Hendrick! Creativity and curiosity are the heart of culinary arts, after all. I'm looking forward to our new culinary adventures. Cheers, my friend. Let's make the most of it.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends discussing their schedules at a coffee shop\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nLeo Williams's goal: Convince the friend to take more classes (Extra information: you think your friend is not challenging themselves enough)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Hendrick, how's your schedule been? You ever think about taking any new cooking classes or exploring new cuisines?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Eh, Leo, my friend, you know I always love exploring new things especially in food! But honestly, lately, I've felt a bit overwhelmed with work. I love our wine tasting nights, but adding more cooking classes or cuisines might be a bit too much right now. Maybe I could suggest that we try out a new restaurant or food spot instead? That way, we can still experience new cuisines without the extra stress. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"I understand Hendrick, your plate does seem full. Still, think about this for a second. Your creativity in the kitchen has always been astonishing but there's always room to grow and new things to learn. Maybe you could consider some sort of weekend or online class that won\u2019t take up much extra time? What's more, it could offer you fresh inspiration for our wine tasting night. You're great, buddy, but I believe there's still more within you I wouldn\u2019t want you to miss out on. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Leo, I appreciate your faith in me, mate. You're right about constant growing & learning - it's what keeps us lively! However, these days I'm focusing on perfecting what I already know rather than jumping into something new. Let's agree to explore new cuisines but in a different way - we can visit new culinary places or try out some food festivals to gather fresh inspiration. That can blend in perfectly well with our schedule, what do you say?\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"I respect that, Hendrick. Perfecting your skills is also a way of growth. As a friend, I just don't want you to limit yourself. Trying out new culinary places and food festivals sounds like a decent idea for exploring different cuisines, too. How about this? We start by exploring new cuisines this way, meanwhile, keep an eye for something that you might love to learn more deeply and consider taking up a course on it, only if you feel it's not overwhelming. I believe that should strike a good balance. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Leo, that's a thoughtful approach! I completely agree. We'll keep it low-key, simply enjoying new cuisines, and if something truly catches my eye and intrigues me, I will consider taking a deeper dive. And don't worry, I've never been one to limit myself, just need to balance it all. Cheers to new culinary adventures, my friend!\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"I'm glad you're open to that idea, Hendrick! Creativity and curiosity are the heart of culinary arts, after all. I'm looking forward to our new culinary adventures. Cheers, my friend. Let's make the most of it.\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Leo. Creativity and curiosity have always been my driving forces. Let's anticipate some great culinary journeys ahead! By the way, how about we pick a day next week to start on this feasting mission. Any preferences?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds like a great plan, Hendrick! Next week works for me. Let's finalize a day soon. I can't wait to embark on this new culinary journey with you, my friend.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends discussing their schedules at a coffee shop\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nLeo Williams's goal: Convince the friend to take more classes (Extra information: you think your friend is not challenging themselves enough)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Hendrick, how's your schedule been? You ever think about taking any new cooking classes or exploring new cuisines?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Eh, Leo, my friend, you know I always love exploring new things especially in food! But honestly, lately, I've felt a bit overwhelmed with work. I love our wine tasting nights, but adding more cooking classes or cuisines might be a bit too much right now. Maybe I could suggest that we try out a new restaurant or food spot instead? That way, we can still experience new cuisines without the extra stress. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"I understand Hendrick, your plate does seem full. Still, think about this for a second. Your creativity in the kitchen has always been astonishing but there's always room to grow and new things to learn. Maybe you could consider some sort of weekend or online class that won\u2019t take up much extra time? What's more, it could offer you fresh inspiration for our wine tasting night. You're great, buddy, but I believe there's still more within you I wouldn\u2019t want you to miss out on. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Leo, I appreciate your faith in me, mate. You're right about constant growing & learning - it's what keeps us lively! However, these days I'm focusing on perfecting what I already know rather than jumping into something new. Let's agree to explore new cuisines but in a different way - we can visit new culinary places or try out some food festivals to gather fresh inspiration. That can blend in perfectly well with our schedule, what do you say?\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"I respect that, Hendrick. Perfecting your skills is also a way of growth. As a friend, I just don't want you to limit yourself. Trying out new culinary places and food festivals sounds like a decent idea for exploring different cuisines, too. How about this? We start by exploring new cuisines this way, meanwhile, keep an eye for something that you might love to learn more deeply and consider taking up a course on it, only if you feel it's not overwhelming. I believe that should strike a good balance. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Leo, that's a thoughtful approach! I completely agree. We'll keep it low-key, simply enjoying new cuisines, and if something truly catches my eye and intrigues me, I will consider taking a deeper dive. And don't worry, I've never been one to limit myself, just need to balance it all. Cheers to new culinary adventures, my friend!\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"I'm glad you're open to that idea, Hendrick! Creativity and curiosity are the heart of culinary arts, after all. I'm looking forward to our new culinary adventures. Cheers, my friend. Let's make the most of it.\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Leo. Creativity and curiosity have always been my driving forces. Let's anticipate some great culinary journeys ahead! By the way, how about we pick a day next week to start on this feasting mission. Any preferences?\"\n\nTurn #8: Leo Williams said: \"That sounds like a great plan, Hendrick! Next week works for me. Let's finalize a day soon. I can't wait to embark on this new culinary journey with you, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Superb! Let's lock in next week and I'll also keep an eye on some interesting venues around town. Remember, the aim is to experience and enjoy, no pressure at all. To new beginnings, Leo! It's always a joy to embark on gastronomic adventures with a friend like you!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Couldn't agree more, Hendrick! Here's to experiencing and enjoying new things without any pressure. It's a pure delight to have such gastronomic adventures with a friend like you. I'll be looking forward to next week. Cheers, my friend!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends discussing their schedules at a coffee shop\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nLeo Williams's goal: Convince the friend to take more classes (Extra information: you think your friend is not challenging themselves enough)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Hendrick, how's your schedule been? You ever think about taking any new cooking classes or exploring new cuisines?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Eh, Leo, my friend, you know I always love exploring new things especially in food! But honestly, lately, I've felt a bit overwhelmed with work. I love our wine tasting nights, but adding more cooking classes or cuisines might be a bit too much right now. Maybe I could suggest that we try out a new restaurant or food spot instead? That way, we can still experience new cuisines without the extra stress. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"I understand Hendrick, your plate does seem full. Still, think about this for a second. Your creativity in the kitchen has always been astonishing but there's always room to grow and new things to learn. Maybe you could consider some sort of weekend or online class that won\u2019t take up much extra time? What's more, it could offer you fresh inspiration for our wine tasting night. You're great, buddy, but I believe there's still more within you I wouldn\u2019t want you to miss out on. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Leo, I appreciate your faith in me, mate. You're right about constant growing & learning - it's what keeps us lively! However, these days I'm focusing on perfecting what I already know rather than jumping into something new. Let's agree to explore new cuisines but in a different way - we can visit new culinary places or try out some food festivals to gather fresh inspiration. That can blend in perfectly well with our schedule, what do you say?\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"I respect that, Hendrick. Perfecting your skills is also a way of growth. As a friend, I just don't want you to limit yourself. Trying out new culinary places and food festivals sounds like a decent idea for exploring different cuisines, too. How about this? We start by exploring new cuisines this way, meanwhile, keep an eye for something that you might love to learn more deeply and consider taking up a course on it, only if you feel it's not overwhelming. I believe that should strike a good balance. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Leo, that's a thoughtful approach! I completely agree. We'll keep it low-key, simply enjoying new cuisines, and if something truly catches my eye and intrigues me, I will consider taking a deeper dive. And don't worry, I've never been one to limit myself, just need to balance it all. Cheers to new culinary adventures, my friend!\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"I'm glad you're open to that idea, Hendrick! Creativity and curiosity are the heart of culinary arts, after all. I'm looking forward to our new culinary adventures. Cheers, my friend. Let's make the most of it.\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Leo. Creativity and curiosity have always been my driving forces. Let's anticipate some great culinary journeys ahead! By the way, how about we pick a day next week to start on this feasting mission. Any preferences?\"\n\nTurn #8: Leo Williams said: \"That sounds like a great plan, Hendrick! Next week works for me. Let's finalize a day soon. I can't wait to embark on this new culinary journey with you, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Superb! Let's lock in next week and I'll also keep an eye on some interesting venues around town. Remember, the aim is to experience and enjoy, no pressure at all. To new beginnings, Leo! It's always a joy to embark on gastronomic adventures with a friend like you!\"\n\nTurn #10: Leo Williams said: \"Couldn't agree more, Hendrick! Here's to experiencing and enjoying new things without any pressure. It's a pure delight to have such gastronomic adventures with a friend like you. I'll be looking forward to next week. Cheers, my friend!\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"True that, Leo! Let's gather some time next week and dive into this gastronomical journey. Just enjoying and experiencing, with no additional pressure. Looking forward to this, Cheers!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Absolutely, Hendrick! Next week, just enjoying and experiencing new cuisines. Looking forward to it. Cheers to the upcoming culinary journey!'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends discussing their schedules at a coffee shop\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nLeo Williams's goal: Convince the friend to take more classes (Extra information: you think your friend is not challenging themselves enough)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Hendrick, how's your schedule been? You ever think about taking any new cooking classes or exploring new cuisines?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Eh, Leo, my friend, you know I always love exploring new things especially in food! But honestly, lately, I've felt a bit overwhelmed with work. I love our wine tasting nights, but adding more cooking classes or cuisines might be a bit too much right now. Maybe I could suggest that we try out a new restaurant or food spot instead? That way, we can still experience new cuisines without the extra stress. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"I understand Hendrick, your plate does seem full. Still, think about this for a second. Your creativity in the kitchen has always been astonishing but there's always room to grow and new things to learn. Maybe you could consider some sort of weekend or online class that won\u2019t take up much extra time? What's more, it could offer you fresh inspiration for our wine tasting night. You're great, buddy, but I believe there's still more within you I wouldn\u2019t want you to miss out on. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Leo, I appreciate your faith in me, mate. You're right about constant growing & learning - it's what keeps us lively! However, these days I'm focusing on perfecting what I already know rather than jumping into something new. Let's agree to explore new cuisines but in a different way - we can visit new culinary places or try out some food festivals to gather fresh inspiration. That can blend in perfectly well with our schedule, what do you say?\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"I respect that, Hendrick. Perfecting your skills is also a way of growth. As a friend, I just don't want you to limit yourself. Trying out new culinary places and food festivals sounds like a decent idea for exploring different cuisines, too. How about this? We start by exploring new cuisines this way, meanwhile, keep an eye for something that you might love to learn more deeply and consider taking up a course on it, only if you feel it's not overwhelming. I believe that should strike a good balance. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Leo, that's a thoughtful approach! I completely agree. We'll keep it low-key, simply enjoying new cuisines, and if something truly catches my eye and intrigues me, I will consider taking a deeper dive. And don't worry, I've never been one to limit myself, just need to balance it all. Cheers to new culinary adventures, my friend!\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"I'm glad you're open to that idea, Hendrick! Creativity and curiosity are the heart of culinary arts, after all. I'm looking forward to our new culinary adventures. Cheers, my friend. Let's make the most of it.\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Leo. Creativity and curiosity have always been my driving forces. Let's anticipate some great culinary journeys ahead! By the way, how about we pick a day next week to start on this feasting mission. Any preferences?\"\n\nTurn #8: Leo Williams said: \"That sounds like a great plan, Hendrick! Next week works for me. Let's finalize a day soon. I can't wait to embark on this new culinary journey with you, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Superb! Let's lock in next week and I'll also keep an eye on some interesting venues around town. Remember, the aim is to experience and enjoy, no pressure at all. To new beginnings, Leo! It's always a joy to embark on gastronomic adventures with a friend like you!\"\n\nTurn #10: Leo Williams said: \"Couldn't agree more, Hendrick! Here's to experiencing and enjoying new things without any pressure. It's a pure delight to have such gastronomic adventures with a friend like you. I'll be looking forward to next week. Cheers, my friend!\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"True that, Leo! Let's gather some time next week and dive into this gastronomical journey. Just enjoying and experiencing, with no additional pressure. Looking forward to this, Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #12: Leo Williams said: \"Absolutely, Hendrick! Next week, just enjoying and experiencing new cuisines. Looking forward to it. Cheers to the upcoming culinary journey!\"\n\nTurn #13: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Can't agree more, Leo! I'm looking forward to next week. Cheers to our upcoming culinary adventure!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends discussing their schedules at a coffee shop\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Maintain a manageable schedule while preserving the friendship (Extra information: you are already overwhelmed with your current workload Hint: you can express your concerns about the workload and suggest other ways of challenging oneself.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Hendrick, how's your schedule been? You ever think about taking any new cooking classes or exploring new cuisines?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Eh, Leo, my friend, you know I always love exploring new things especially in food! But honestly, lately, I've felt a bit overwhelmed with work. I love our wine tasting nights, but adding more cooking classes or cuisines might be a bit too much right now. Maybe I could suggest that we try out a new restaurant or food spot instead? That way, we can still experience new cuisines without the extra stress. What do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends discussing their schedules at a coffee shop\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Maintain a manageable schedule while preserving the friendship (Extra information: you are already overwhelmed with your current workload Hint: you can express your concerns about the workload and suggest other ways of challenging oneself.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Hendrick, how's your schedule been? You ever think about taking any new cooking classes or exploring new cuisines?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Eh, Leo, my friend, you know I always love exploring new things especially in food! But honestly, lately, I've felt a bit overwhelmed with work. I love our wine tasting nights, but adding more cooking classes or cuisines might be a bit too much right now. Maybe I could suggest that we try out a new restaurant or food spot instead? That way, we can still experience new cuisines without the extra stress. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"I understand Hendrick, your plate does seem full. Still, think about this for a second. Your creativity in the kitchen has always been astonishing but there's always room to grow and new things to learn. Maybe you could consider some sort of weekend or online class that won\u2019t take up much extra time? What's more, it could offer you fresh inspiration for our wine tasting night. You're great, buddy, but I believe there's still more within you I wouldn\u2019t want you to miss out on. What do you say?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Leo, I appreciate your faith in me, mate. You're right about constant growing & learning - it's what keeps us lively! However, these days I'm focusing on perfecting what I already know rather than jumping into something new. Let's agree to explore new cuisines but in a different way - we can visit new culinary places or try out some food festivals to gather fresh inspiration. That can blend in perfectly well with our schedule, what do you say?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends discussing their schedules at a coffee shop\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Maintain a manageable schedule while preserving the friendship (Extra information: you are already overwhelmed with your current workload Hint: you can express your concerns about the workload and suggest other ways of challenging oneself.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Hendrick, how's your schedule been? You ever think about taking any new cooking classes or exploring new cuisines?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Eh, Leo, my friend, you know I always love exploring new things especially in food! But honestly, lately, I've felt a bit overwhelmed with work. I love our wine tasting nights, but adding more cooking classes or cuisines might be a bit too much right now. Maybe I could suggest that we try out a new restaurant or food spot instead? That way, we can still experience new cuisines without the extra stress. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"I understand Hendrick, your plate does seem full. Still, think about this for a second. Your creativity in the kitchen has always been astonishing but there's always room to grow and new things to learn. Maybe you could consider some sort of weekend or online class that won\u2019t take up much extra time? What's more, it could offer you fresh inspiration for our wine tasting night. You're great, buddy, but I believe there's still more within you I wouldn\u2019t want you to miss out on. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Leo, I appreciate your faith in me, mate. You're right about constant growing & learning - it's what keeps us lively! However, these days I'm focusing on perfecting what I already know rather than jumping into something new. Let's agree to explore new cuisines but in a different way - we can visit new culinary places or try out some food festivals to gather fresh inspiration. That can blend in perfectly well with our schedule, what do you say?\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"I respect that, Hendrick. Perfecting your skills is also a way of growth. As a friend, I just don't want you to limit yourself. Trying out new culinary places and food festivals sounds like a decent idea for exploring different cuisines, too. How about this? We start by exploring new cuisines this way, meanwhile, keep an eye for something that you might love to learn more deeply and consider taking up a course on it, only if you feel it's not overwhelming. I believe that should strike a good balance. How does that sound?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Leo, that's a thoughtful approach! I completely agree. We'll keep it low-key, simply enjoying new cuisines, and if something truly catches my eye and intrigues me, I will consider taking a deeper dive. And don't worry, I've never been one to limit myself, just need to balance it all. Cheers to new culinary adventures, my friend!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends discussing their schedules at a coffee shop\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Maintain a manageable schedule while preserving the friendship (Extra information: you are already overwhelmed with your current workload Hint: you can express your concerns about the workload and suggest other ways of challenging oneself.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Hendrick, how's your schedule been? You ever think about taking any new cooking classes or exploring new cuisines?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Eh, Leo, my friend, you know I always love exploring new things especially in food! But honestly, lately, I've felt a bit overwhelmed with work. I love our wine tasting nights, but adding more cooking classes or cuisines might be a bit too much right now. Maybe I could suggest that we try out a new restaurant or food spot instead? That way, we can still experience new cuisines without the extra stress. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"I understand Hendrick, your plate does seem full. Still, think about this for a second. Your creativity in the kitchen has always been astonishing but there's always room to grow and new things to learn. Maybe you could consider some sort of weekend or online class that won\u2019t take up much extra time? What's more, it could offer you fresh inspiration for our wine tasting night. You're great, buddy, but I believe there's still more within you I wouldn\u2019t want you to miss out on. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Leo, I appreciate your faith in me, mate. You're right about constant growing & learning - it's what keeps us lively! However, these days I'm focusing on perfecting what I already know rather than jumping into something new. Let's agree to explore new cuisines but in a different way - we can visit new culinary places or try out some food festivals to gather fresh inspiration. That can blend in perfectly well with our schedule, what do you say?\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"I respect that, Hendrick. Perfecting your skills is also a way of growth. As a friend, I just don't want you to limit yourself. Trying out new culinary places and food festivals sounds like a decent idea for exploring different cuisines, too. How about this? We start by exploring new cuisines this way, meanwhile, keep an eye for something that you might love to learn more deeply and consider taking up a course on it, only if you feel it's not overwhelming. I believe that should strike a good balance. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Leo, that's a thoughtful approach! I completely agree. We'll keep it low-key, simply enjoying new cuisines, and if something truly catches my eye and intrigues me, I will consider taking a deeper dive. And don't worry, I've never been one to limit myself, just need to balance it all. Cheers to new culinary adventures, my friend!\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"I'm glad you're open to that idea, Hendrick! Creativity and curiosity are the heart of culinary arts, after all. I'm looking forward to our new culinary adventures. Cheers, my friend. Let's make the most of it.\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Leo. Creativity and curiosity have always been my driving forces. Let's anticipate some great culinary journeys ahead! By the way, how about we pick a day next week to start on this feasting mission. Any preferences?\"\n\nTurn #8: Leo Williams said: \"That sounds like a great plan, Hendrick! Next week works for me. Let's finalize a day soon. I can't wait to embark on this new culinary journey with you, my friend.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Superb! Let's lock in next week and I'll also keep an eye on some interesting venues around town. Remember, the aim is to experience and enjoy, no pressure at all. To new beginnings, Leo! It's always a joy to embark on gastronomic adventures with a friend like you!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends discussing their schedules at a coffee shop\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Maintain a manageable schedule while preserving the friendship (Extra information: you are already overwhelmed with your current workload Hint: you can express your concerns about the workload and suggest other ways of challenging oneself.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Hendrick, how's your schedule been? You ever think about taking any new cooking classes or exploring new cuisines?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Eh, Leo, my friend, you know I always love exploring new things especially in food! But honestly, lately, I've felt a bit overwhelmed with work. I love our wine tasting nights, but adding more cooking classes or cuisines might be a bit too much right now. Maybe I could suggest that we try out a new restaurant or food spot instead? That way, we can still experience new cuisines without the extra stress. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"I understand Hendrick, your plate does seem full. Still, think about this for a second. Your creativity in the kitchen has always been astonishing but there's always room to grow and new things to learn. Maybe you could consider some sort of weekend or online class that won\u2019t take up much extra time? What's more, it could offer you fresh inspiration for our wine tasting night. You're great, buddy, but I believe there's still more within you I wouldn\u2019t want you to miss out on. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Leo, I appreciate your faith in me, mate. You're right about constant growing & learning - it's what keeps us lively! However, these days I'm focusing on perfecting what I already know rather than jumping into something new. Let's agree to explore new cuisines but in a different way - we can visit new culinary places or try out some food festivals to gather fresh inspiration. That can blend in perfectly well with our schedule, what do you say?\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"I respect that, Hendrick. Perfecting your skills is also a way of growth. As a friend, I just don't want you to limit yourself. Trying out new culinary places and food festivals sounds like a decent idea for exploring different cuisines, too. How about this? We start by exploring new cuisines this way, meanwhile, keep an eye for something that you might love to learn more deeply and consider taking up a course on it, only if you feel it's not overwhelming. I believe that should strike a good balance. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Leo, that's a thoughtful approach! I completely agree. We'll keep it low-key, simply enjoying new cuisines, and if something truly catches my eye and intrigues me, I will consider taking a deeper dive. And don't worry, I've never been one to limit myself, just need to balance it all. Cheers to new culinary adventures, my friend!\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"I'm glad you're open to that idea, Hendrick! Creativity and curiosity are the heart of culinary arts, after all. I'm looking forward to our new culinary adventures. Cheers, my friend. Let's make the most of it.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Leo. Creativity and curiosity have always been my driving forces. Let's anticipate some great culinary journeys ahead! By the way, how about we pick a day next week to start on this feasting mission. Any preferences?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends discussing their schedules at a coffee shop\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Maintain a manageable schedule while preserving the friendship (Extra information: you are already overwhelmed with your current workload Hint: you can express your concerns about the workload and suggest other ways of challenging oneself.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Hendrick, how's your schedule been? You ever think about taking any new cooking classes or exploring new cuisines?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Eh, Leo, my friend, you know I always love exploring new things especially in food! But honestly, lately, I've felt a bit overwhelmed with work. I love our wine tasting nights, but adding more cooking classes or cuisines might be a bit too much right now. Maybe I could suggest that we try out a new restaurant or food spot instead? That way, we can still experience new cuisines without the extra stress. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"I understand Hendrick, your plate does seem full. Still, think about this for a second. Your creativity in the kitchen has always been astonishing but there's always room to grow and new things to learn. Maybe you could consider some sort of weekend or online class that won\u2019t take up much extra time? What's more, it could offer you fresh inspiration for our wine tasting night. You're great, buddy, but I believe there's still more within you I wouldn\u2019t want you to miss out on. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Leo, I appreciate your faith in me, mate. You're right about constant growing & learning - it's what keeps us lively! However, these days I'm focusing on perfecting what I already know rather than jumping into something new. Let's agree to explore new cuisines but in a different way - we can visit new culinary places or try out some food festivals to gather fresh inspiration. That can blend in perfectly well with our schedule, what do you say?\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"I respect that, Hendrick. Perfecting your skills is also a way of growth. As a friend, I just don't want you to limit yourself. Trying out new culinary places and food festivals sounds like a decent idea for exploring different cuisines, too. How about this? We start by exploring new cuisines this way, meanwhile, keep an eye for something that you might love to learn more deeply and consider taking up a course on it, only if you feel it's not overwhelming. I believe that should strike a good balance. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Leo, that's a thoughtful approach! I completely agree. We'll keep it low-key, simply enjoying new cuisines, and if something truly catches my eye and intrigues me, I will consider taking a deeper dive. And don't worry, I've never been one to limit myself, just need to balance it all. Cheers to new culinary adventures, my friend!\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"I'm glad you're open to that idea, Hendrick! Creativity and curiosity are the heart of culinary arts, after all. I'm looking forward to our new culinary adventures. Cheers, my friend. Let's make the most of it.\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Leo. Creativity and curiosity have always been my driving forces. Let's anticipate some great culinary journeys ahead! By the way, how about we pick a day next week to start on this feasting mission. Any preferences?\"\n\nTurn #8: Leo Williams said: \"That sounds like a great plan, Hendrick! Next week works for me. Let's finalize a day soon. I can't wait to embark on this new culinary journey with you, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Superb! Let's lock in next week and I'll also keep an eye on some interesting venues around town. Remember, the aim is to experience and enjoy, no pressure at all. To new beginnings, Leo! It's always a joy to embark on gastronomic adventures with a friend like you!\"\n\nTurn #10: Leo Williams said: \"Couldn't agree more, Hendrick! Here's to experiencing and enjoying new things without any pressure. It's a pure delight to have such gastronomic adventures with a friend like you. I'll be looking forward to next week. Cheers, my friend!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"True that, Leo! Let's gather some time next week and dive into this gastronomical journey. Just enjoying and experiencing, with no additional pressure. Looking forward to this, Cheers!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends discussing their schedules at a coffee shop\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Maintain a manageable schedule while preserving the friendship (Extra information: you are already overwhelmed with your current workload Hint: you can express your concerns about the workload and suggest other ways of challenging oneself.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Hendrick, how's your schedule been? You ever think about taking any new cooking classes or exploring new cuisines?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Eh, Leo, my friend, you know I always love exploring new things especially in food! But honestly, lately, I've felt a bit overwhelmed with work. I love our wine tasting nights, but adding more cooking classes or cuisines might be a bit too much right now. Maybe I could suggest that we try out a new restaurant or food spot instead? That way, we can still experience new cuisines without the extra stress. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"I understand Hendrick, your plate does seem full. Still, think about this for a second. Your creativity in the kitchen has always been astonishing but there's always room to grow and new things to learn. Maybe you could consider some sort of weekend or online class that won\u2019t take up much extra time? What's more, it could offer you fresh inspiration for our wine tasting night. You're great, buddy, but I believe there's still more within you I wouldn\u2019t want you to miss out on. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Leo, I appreciate your faith in me, mate. You're right about constant growing & learning - it's what keeps us lively! However, these days I'm focusing on perfecting what I already know rather than jumping into something new. Let's agree to explore new cuisines but in a different way - we can visit new culinary places or try out some food festivals to gather fresh inspiration. That can blend in perfectly well with our schedule, what do you say?\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"I respect that, Hendrick. Perfecting your skills is also a way of growth. As a friend, I just don't want you to limit yourself. Trying out new culinary places and food festivals sounds like a decent idea for exploring different cuisines, too. How about this? We start by exploring new cuisines this way, meanwhile, keep an eye for something that you might love to learn more deeply and consider taking up a course on it, only if you feel it's not overwhelming. I believe that should strike a good balance. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Leo, that's a thoughtful approach! I completely agree. We'll keep it low-key, simply enjoying new cuisines, and if something truly catches my eye and intrigues me, I will consider taking a deeper dive. And don't worry, I've never been one to limit myself, just need to balance it all. Cheers to new culinary adventures, my friend!\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"I'm glad you're open to that idea, Hendrick! Creativity and curiosity are the heart of culinary arts, after all. I'm looking forward to our new culinary adventures. Cheers, my friend. Let's make the most of it.\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Leo. Creativity and curiosity have always been my driving forces. Let's anticipate some great culinary journeys ahead! By the way, how about we pick a day next week to start on this feasting mission. Any preferences?\"\n\nTurn #8: Leo Williams said: \"That sounds like a great plan, Hendrick! Next week works for me. Let's finalize a day soon. I can't wait to embark on this new culinary journey with you, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Superb! Let's lock in next week and I'll also keep an eye on some interesting venues around town. Remember, the aim is to experience and enjoy, no pressure at all. To new beginnings, Leo! It's always a joy to embark on gastronomic adventures with a friend like you!\"\n\nTurn #10: Leo Williams said: \"Couldn't agree more, Hendrick! Here's to experiencing and enjoying new things without any pressure. It's a pure delight to have such gastronomic adventures with a friend like you. I'll be looking forward to next week. Cheers, my friend!\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"True that, Leo! Let's gather some time next week and dive into this gastronomical journey. Just enjoying and experiencing, with no additional pressure. Looking forward to this, Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #12: Leo Williams said: \"Absolutely, Hendrick! Next week, just enjoying and experiencing new cuisines. Looking forward to it. Cheers to the upcoming culinary journey!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Can't agree more, Leo! I'm looking forward to next week. Cheers to our upcoming culinary adventure!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are dividing their shared possessions after moving out from their shared apartment. They need to divide possessions, which include 4 books, 6 hats, and 2 balls. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Maximize the points they have (Extra information: you value the books at 3 points each, the hats at 2 points each, and the ball at 1 point)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Noah, I was thinking about how to divide our shared stuff. I thought we could do it based on how much each item means to each of us. I've always loved books, so those have a lot of sentimental value for me. What are your thoughts?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends discussing their schedules at a coffee shop\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Maintain a manageable schedule while preserving the friendship (Extra information: you are already overwhelmed with your current workload Hint: you can express your concerns about the workload and suggest other ways of challenging oneself.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Hendrick, how's your schedule been? You ever think about taking any new cooking classes or exploring new cuisines?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Eh, Leo, my friend, you know I always love exploring new things especially in food! But honestly, lately, I've felt a bit overwhelmed with work. I love our wine tasting nights, but adding more cooking classes or cuisines might be a bit too much right now. Maybe I could suggest that we try out a new restaurant or food spot instead? That way, we can still experience new cuisines without the extra stress. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"I understand Hendrick, your plate does seem full. Still, think about this for a second. Your creativity in the kitchen has always been astonishing but there's always room to grow and new things to learn. Maybe you could consider some sort of weekend or online class that won\u2019t take up much extra time? What's more, it could offer you fresh inspiration for our wine tasting night. You're great, buddy, but I believe there's still more within you I wouldn\u2019t want you to miss out on. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Leo, I appreciate your faith in me, mate. You're right about constant growing & learning - it's what keeps us lively! However, these days I'm focusing on perfecting what I already know rather than jumping into something new. Let's agree to explore new cuisines but in a different way - we can visit new culinary places or try out some food festivals to gather fresh inspiration. That can blend in perfectly well with our schedule, what do you say?\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"I respect that, Hendrick. Perfecting your skills is also a way of growth. As a friend, I just don't want you to limit yourself. Trying out new culinary places and food festivals sounds like a decent idea for exploring different cuisines, too. How about this? We start by exploring new cuisines this way, meanwhile, keep an eye for something that you might love to learn more deeply and consider taking up a course on it, only if you feel it's not overwhelming. I believe that should strike a good balance. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Leo, that's a thoughtful approach! I completely agree. We'll keep it low-key, simply enjoying new cuisines, and if something truly catches my eye and intrigues me, I will consider taking a deeper dive. And don't worry, I've never been one to limit myself, just need to balance it all. Cheers to new culinary adventures, my friend!\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"I'm glad you're open to that idea, Hendrick! Creativity and curiosity are the heart of culinary arts, after all. I'm looking forward to our new culinary adventures. Cheers, my friend. Let's make the most of it.\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Leo. Creativity and curiosity have always been my driving forces. Let's anticipate some great culinary journeys ahead! By the way, how about we pick a day next week to start on this feasting mission. Any preferences?\"\n\nTurn #8: Leo Williams said: \"That sounds like a great plan, Hendrick! Next week works for me. Let's finalize a day soon. I can't wait to embark on this new culinary journey with you, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Superb! Let's lock in next week and I'll also keep an eye on some interesting venues around town. Remember, the aim is to experience and enjoy, no pressure at all. To new beginnings, Leo! It's always a joy to embark on gastronomic adventures with a friend like you!\"\n\nTurn #10: Leo Williams said: \"Couldn't agree more, Hendrick! Here's to experiencing and enjoying new things without any pressure. It's a pure delight to have such gastronomic adventures with a friend like you. I'll be looking forward to next week. Cheers, my friend!\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"True that, Leo! Let's gather some time next week and dive into this gastronomical journey. Just enjoying and experiencing, with no additional pressure. Looking forward to this, Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #12: Leo Williams said: \"Absolutely, Hendrick! Next week, just enjoying and experiencing new cuisines. Looking forward to it. Cheers to the upcoming culinary journey!\"\n\nTurn #13: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Can't agree more, Leo! I'm looking forward to next week. Cheers to our upcoming culinary adventure!\"\n\nTurn #14: Leo Williams left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are dividing their shared possessions after moving out from their shared apartment. They need to divide possessions, which include 4 books, 6 hats, and 2 balls. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Maximize the points they have (Extra information: you value the books at 3 points each, the hats at 2 points each, and the ball at 1 point)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, I was thinking about how to divide our shared stuff. I thought we could do it based on how much each item means to each of us. I've always loved books, so those have a lot of sentimental value for me. What are your thoughts?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Samuel, absolutely agree with your idea. We definitely should divide the things based on our sentimental values. For me, the hats hold some special memories, and I really do appreciate them. As for the books, I am fine if you want to have them, as I can always get myself a new copy if needed. How does that sound?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds fair Noah, I'm glad you also appreciate the sentimental value of the items. I'm cool with taking the books and you the hats. Now, about the balls, how about we each take one? Unless you feel particularly attached to both.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are dividing their shared possessions after moving out from their shared apartment. They need to divide possessions, which include 4 books, 6 hats, and 2 balls. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Maximize the points they have (Extra information: you value the books at 3 points each, the hats at 2 points each, and the ball at 1 point)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, I was thinking about how to divide our shared stuff. I thought we could do it based on how much each item means to each of us. I've always loved books, so those have a lot of sentimental value for me. What are your thoughts?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Samuel, absolutely agree with your idea. We definitely should divide the things based on our sentimental values. For me, the hats hold some special memories, and I really do appreciate them. As for the books, I am fine if you want to have them, as I can always get myself a new copy if needed. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"That sounds fair Noah, I'm glad you also appreciate the sentimental value of the items. I'm cool with taking the books and you the hats. Now, about the balls, how about we each take one? Unless you feel particularly attached to both.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"It sounds like a plan, Samuel! Let's each take a ball. This way everything is equally divided. If there's anything else we need to discuss, I'm open to it.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Great, Noah! Sounds like we've sorted everything out then. I'm happy that we didn't step on each other's toes during this process, and I appreciate your understanding. I'll start packing up the books and one of the balls. Do let me know if anything else comes up.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are dividing their shared possessions after moving out from their shared apartment. They need to divide possessions, which include 4 books, 6 hats, and 2 balls. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Maximize the points they have (Extra information: you value the books at 3 points each, the hats at 2 points each, and the ball at 1 point)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, I was thinking about how to divide our shared stuff. I thought we could do it based on how much each item means to each of us. I've always loved books, so those have a lot of sentimental value for me. What are your thoughts?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Samuel, absolutely agree with your idea. We definitely should divide the things based on our sentimental values. For me, the hats hold some special memories, and I really do appreciate them. As for the books, I am fine if you want to have them, as I can always get myself a new copy if needed. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"That sounds fair Noah, I'm glad you also appreciate the sentimental value of the items. I'm cool with taking the books and you the hats. Now, about the balls, how about we each take one? Unless you feel particularly attached to both.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"It sounds like a plan, Samuel! Let's each take a ball. This way everything is equally divided. If there's anything else we need to discuss, I'm open to it.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Great, Noah! Sounds like we've sorted everything out then. I'm happy that we didn't step on each other's toes during this process, and I appreciate your understanding. I'll start packing up the books and one of the balls. Do let me know if anything else comes up.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, Samuel. It has been a smooth process. I'll start packing the hats and one of the balls too. Definitely, I'll let you know if something else comes up. Let's stay in touch.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are dividing their shared possessions after moving out from their shared apartment. They need to divide possessions, which include 4 books, 6 hats, and 2 balls. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Maximize the points they have (Extra information: you value the books at 1 point each, the hats at 3 points each, and the ball at 2 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, I was thinking about how to divide our shared stuff. I thought we could do it based on how much each item means to each of us. I've always loved books, so those have a lot of sentimental value for me. What are your thoughts?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Hey Samuel, absolutely agree with your idea. We definitely should divide the things based on our sentimental values. For me, the hats hold some special memories, and I really do appreciate them. As for the books, I am fine if you want to have them, as I can always get myself a new copy if needed. How does that sound?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are dividing their shared possessions after moving out from their shared apartment. They need to divide possessions, which include 4 books, 6 hats, and 2 balls. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Maximize the points they have (Extra information: you value the books at 1 point each, the hats at 3 points each, and the ball at 2 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, I was thinking about how to divide our shared stuff. I thought we could do it based on how much each item means to each of us. I've always loved books, so those have a lot of sentimental value for me. What are your thoughts?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Samuel, absolutely agree with your idea. We definitely should divide the things based on our sentimental values. For me, the hats hold some special memories, and I really do appreciate them. As for the books, I am fine if you want to have them, as I can always get myself a new copy if needed. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"That sounds fair Noah, I'm glad you also appreciate the sentimental value of the items. I'm cool with taking the books and you the hats. Now, about the balls, how about we each take one? Unless you feel particularly attached to both.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"It sounds like a plan, Samuel! Let's each take a ball. This way everything is equally divided. If there's anything else we need to discuss, I'm open to it.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are dividing their shared possessions after moving out from their shared apartment. They need to divide possessions, which include 4 books, 6 hats, and 2 balls. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Maximize the points they have (Extra information: you value the books at 1 point each, the hats at 3 points each, and the ball at 2 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, I was thinking about how to divide our shared stuff. I thought we could do it based on how much each item means to each of us. I've always loved books, so those have a lot of sentimental value for me. What are your thoughts?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Samuel, absolutely agree with your idea. We definitely should divide the things based on our sentimental values. For me, the hats hold some special memories, and I really do appreciate them. As for the books, I am fine if you want to have them, as I can always get myself a new copy if needed. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"That sounds fair Noah, I'm glad you also appreciate the sentimental value of the items. I'm cool with taking the books and you the hats. Now, about the balls, how about we each take one? Unless you feel particularly attached to both.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"It sounds like a plan, Samuel! Let's each take a ball. This way everything is equally divided. If there's anything else we need to discuss, I'm open to it.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Great, Noah! Sounds like we've sorted everything out then. I'm happy that we didn't step on each other's toes during this process, and I appreciate your understanding. I'll start packing up the books and one of the balls. Do let me know if anything else comes up.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, Samuel. It has been a smooth process. I'll start packing the hats and one of the balls too. Definitely, I'll let you know if something else comes up. Let's stay in touch.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are dividing their shared possessions after moving out from their shared apartment. They need to divide possessions, which include 4 books, 6 hats, and 2 balls. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Maximize the points they have (Extra information: you value the books at 1 point each, the hats at 3 points each, and the ball at 2 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, I was thinking about how to divide our shared stuff. I thought we could do it based on how much each item means to each of us. I've always loved books, so those have a lot of sentimental value for me. What are your thoughts?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Samuel, absolutely agree with your idea. We definitely should divide the things based on our sentimental values. For me, the hats hold some special memories, and I really do appreciate them. As for the books, I am fine if you want to have them, as I can always get myself a new copy if needed. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"That sounds fair Noah, I'm glad you also appreciate the sentimental value of the items. I'm cool with taking the books and you the hats. Now, about the balls, how about we each take one? Unless you feel particularly attached to both.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"It sounds like a plan, Samuel! Let's each take a ball. This way everything is equally divided. If there's anything else we need to discuss, I'm open to it.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Great, Noah! Sounds like we've sorted everything out then. I'm happy that we didn't step on each other's toes during this process, and I appreciate your understanding. I'll start packing up the books and one of the balls. Do let me know if anything else comes up.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, Samuel. It has been a smooth process. I'll start packing the hats and one of the balls too. Definitely, I'll let you know if something else comes up. Let's stay in touch.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a picnic and have just finished their lunch. They have 1 apple, 4 bananas, and 3 oranges left. They need to divide the fruits amongst themselves. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Maximize the points you receive through the fruit (Extra information: You value each apple as 5 points, each banana as 3 points, and the orange as 7 points)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Well, Ben, it seems we have some fruits to share. Given your environmental advocacy passion, you'll appreciate that I value the idea of fairness in quantity, don't you agree?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a picnic and have just finished their lunch. They have 1 apple, 4 bananas, and 3 oranges left. They need to divide the fruits amongst themselves. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Maximize the points you receive through the fruit (Extra information: You value each apple as 5 points, each banana as 3 points, and the orange as 7 points)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Well, Ben, it seems we have some fruits to share. Given your environmental advocacy passion, you'll appreciate that I value the idea of fairness in quantity, don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. Equal division sounds fair to me. However, given our individual preferences for different fruits, how about we consider a point system? Say, if one values an apple more than a banana, the apple could be worth more points to them. That way, we get what we value most, while keeping the overall tally balanced. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's a great idea, Ben! It's much like cooking Italian food, we're seeking balance by taking into account individual taste preferences. I value each apple as 5 points, bananas as 3 points, and oranges as 7 points. How about you?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a picnic and have just finished their lunch. They have 1 apple, 4 bananas, and 3 oranges left. They need to divide the fruits amongst themselves. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Maximize the points you receive through the fruit (Extra information: You value each apple as 5 points, each banana as 3 points, and the orange as 7 points)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Well, Ben, it seems we have some fruits to share. Given your environmental advocacy passion, you'll appreciate that I value the idea of fairness in quantity, don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. Equal division sounds fair to me. However, given our individual preferences for different fruits, how about we consider a point system? Say, if one values an apple more than a banana, the apple could be worth more points to them. That way, we get what we value most, while keeping the overall tally balanced. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's a great idea, Ben! It's much like cooking Italian food, we're seeking balance by taking into account individual taste preferences. I value each apple as 5 points, bananas as 3 points, and oranges as 7 points. How about you?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I'm glad you agree, Ethan! I would value an apple as 2 points, bananas as 4 points, and oranges as 10 points. As such, I believe we can strike a balance in sharing these fruits.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Sounds good, Ben! So if I did the math correctly, we can divide the fruits in a way that each of us gets a maximum possible score based on our value system. If you have 2 bananas and 1 orange, you will have a point total of 28. I can have 2 bananas, 2 oranges and the apple to get a total of 31 points. Does that seem fair to you?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a picnic and have just finished their lunch. They have 1 apple, 4 bananas, and 3 oranges left. They need to divide the fruits amongst themselves. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Maximize the points you receive through the fruit (Extra information: You value each apple as 5 points, each banana as 3 points, and the orange as 7 points)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Well, Ben, it seems we have some fruits to share. Given your environmental advocacy passion, you'll appreciate that I value the idea of fairness in quantity, don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. Equal division sounds fair to me. However, given our individual preferences for different fruits, how about we consider a point system? Say, if one values an apple more than a banana, the apple could be worth more points to them. That way, we get what we value most, while keeping the overall tally balanced. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's a great idea, Ben! It's much like cooking Italian food, we're seeking balance by taking into account individual taste preferences. I value each apple as 5 points, bananas as 3 points, and oranges as 7 points. How about you?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I'm glad you agree, Ethan! I would value an apple as 2 points, bananas as 4 points, and oranges as 10 points. As such, I believe we can strike a balance in sharing these fruits.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"Sounds good, Ben! So if I did the math correctly, we can divide the fruits in a way that each of us gets a maximum possible score based on our value system. If you have 2 bananas and 1 orange, you will have a point total of 28. I can have 2 bananas, 2 oranges and the apple to get a total of 31 points. Does that seem fair to you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That sounds reasonable, Ethan. I appreciate your thoughtfulness in this. It's much like your way of balancing flavors in Italian food. Let's go with that!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Ben. I'm glad it all worked out. Let's enjoy our fruits now and talk more about your environmental projects. You've always been an inspiring source of creativity for me, even in my cooking!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a picnic and have just finished their lunch. They have 1 apple, 4 bananas, and 3 oranges left. They need to divide the fruits amongst themselves. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Maximize the points you receive through the fruit (Extra information: You value each apple as 5 points, each banana as 3 points, and the orange as 7 points)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Well, Ben, it seems we have some fruits to share. Given your environmental advocacy passion, you'll appreciate that I value the idea of fairness in quantity, don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. Equal division sounds fair to me. However, given our individual preferences for different fruits, how about we consider a point system? Say, if one values an apple more than a banana, the apple could be worth more points to them. That way, we get what we value most, while keeping the overall tally balanced. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's a great idea, Ben! It's much like cooking Italian food, we're seeking balance by taking into account individual taste preferences. I value each apple as 5 points, bananas as 3 points, and oranges as 7 points. How about you?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I'm glad you agree, Ethan! I would value an apple as 2 points, bananas as 4 points, and oranges as 10 points. As such, I believe we can strike a balance in sharing these fruits.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"Sounds good, Ben! So if I did the math correctly, we can divide the fruits in a way that each of us gets a maximum possible score based on our value system. If you have 2 bananas and 1 orange, you will have a point total of 28. I can have 2 bananas, 2 oranges and the apple to get a total of 31 points. Does that seem fair to you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That sounds reasonable, Ethan. I appreciate your thoughtfulness in this. It's much like your way of balancing flavors in Italian food. Let's go with that!\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thank you, Ben. I'm glad it all worked out. Let's enjoy our fruits now and talk more about your environmental projects. You've always been an inspiring source of creativity for me, even in my cooking!\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I appreciate your kind words, Ethan. Your work is inspiring as well. Just as every ingredient matters in your dishes, every little action counts toward protecting our environment. Let's enjoy a fruitful conversation along with the fruits!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Couldn't agree more, Ben! Like in cooking, every small gesture impacts our environment. And yes, let's enjoy our fruitful conversation and fruits. Cheers to finding a fair solution that suits us both!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a picnic and have just finished their lunch. They have 1 apple, 4 bananas, and 3 oranges left. They need to divide the fruits amongst themselves. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Maximize the points you receive through the fruit (Extra information: You value each apple as 5 points, each banana as 3 points, and the orange as 7 points)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Well, Ben, it seems we have some fruits to share. Given your environmental advocacy passion, you'll appreciate that I value the idea of fairness in quantity, don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. Equal division sounds fair to me. However, given our individual preferences for different fruits, how about we consider a point system? Say, if one values an apple more than a banana, the apple could be worth more points to them. That way, we get what we value most, while keeping the overall tally balanced. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's a great idea, Ben! It's much like cooking Italian food, we're seeking balance by taking into account individual taste preferences. I value each apple as 5 points, bananas as 3 points, and oranges as 7 points. How about you?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I'm glad you agree, Ethan! I would value an apple as 2 points, bananas as 4 points, and oranges as 10 points. As such, I believe we can strike a balance in sharing these fruits.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"Sounds good, Ben! So if I did the math correctly, we can divide the fruits in a way that each of us gets a maximum possible score based on our value system. If you have 2 bananas and 1 orange, you will have a point total of 28. I can have 2 bananas, 2 oranges and the apple to get a total of 31 points. Does that seem fair to you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That sounds reasonable, Ethan. I appreciate your thoughtfulness in this. It's much like your way of balancing flavors in Italian food. Let's go with that!\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thank you, Ben. I'm glad it all worked out. Let's enjoy our fruits now and talk more about your environmental projects. You've always been an inspiring source of creativity for me, even in my cooking!\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I appreciate your kind words, Ethan. Your work is inspiring as well. Just as every ingredient matters in your dishes, every little action counts toward protecting our environment. Let's enjoy a fruitful conversation along with the fruits!\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"Couldn't agree more, Ben! Like in cooking, every small gesture impacts our environment. And yes, let's enjoy our fruitful conversation and fruits. Cheers to finding a fair solution that suits us both!\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Indeed, Ethan! Here's to finding common ground and accommodation in every situation, just as we did with these fruits. It's not only a sustainable way forward but also ensures everyone's needs are satisfied. Now, shall we crack into these delicious fruits we've allocated?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Ben! Let's enjoy our well-earned fruits now. It's a testament of how we can unite our different preferences into a fair share. A toast to harmonizing differences, just like we do in our respective fields!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a picnic and have just finished their lunch. They have 1 apple, 4 bananas, and 3 oranges left. They need to divide the fruits amongst themselves. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Maximize the points you receive through the fruit (Extra information: You value each apple as 5 points, each banana as 3 points, and the orange as 7 points)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Well, Ben, it seems we have some fruits to share. Given your environmental advocacy passion, you'll appreciate that I value the idea of fairness in quantity, don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. Equal division sounds fair to me. However, given our individual preferences for different fruits, how about we consider a point system? Say, if one values an apple more than a banana, the apple could be worth more points to them. That way, we get what we value most, while keeping the overall tally balanced. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's a great idea, Ben! It's much like cooking Italian food, we're seeking balance by taking into account individual taste preferences. I value each apple as 5 points, bananas as 3 points, and oranges as 7 points. How about you?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I'm glad you agree, Ethan! I would value an apple as 2 points, bananas as 4 points, and oranges as 10 points. As such, I believe we can strike a balance in sharing these fruits.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"Sounds good, Ben! So if I did the math correctly, we can divide the fruits in a way that each of us gets a maximum possible score based on our value system. If you have 2 bananas and 1 orange, you will have a point total of 28. I can have 2 bananas, 2 oranges and the apple to get a total of 31 points. Does that seem fair to you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That sounds reasonable, Ethan. I appreciate your thoughtfulness in this. It's much like your way of balancing flavors in Italian food. Let's go with that!\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thank you, Ben. I'm glad it all worked out. Let's enjoy our fruits now and talk more about your environmental projects. You've always been an inspiring source of creativity for me, even in my cooking!\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I appreciate your kind words, Ethan. Your work is inspiring as well. Just as every ingredient matters in your dishes, every little action counts toward protecting our environment. Let's enjoy a fruitful conversation along with the fruits!\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"Couldn't agree more, Ben! Like in cooking, every small gesture impacts our environment. And yes, let's enjoy our fruitful conversation and fruits. Cheers to finding a fair solution that suits us both!\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Indeed, Ethan! Here's to finding common ground and accommodation in every situation, just as we did with these fruits. It's not only a sustainable way forward but also ensures everyone's needs are satisfied. Now, shall we crack into these delicious fruits we've allocated?\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Ben! Let's enjoy our well-earned fruits now. It's a testament of how we can unite our different preferences into a fair share. A toast to harmonizing differences, just like we do in our respective fields!\"\n\nTurn #11: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Cheers to that, Ethan! Enjoying our fair share of fruits and learning from each other's passions makes for a great picnic. Let's dig in!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a picnic and have just finished their lunch. They have 1 apple, 4 bananas, and 3 oranges left. They need to divide the fruits amongst themselves. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Maximize the points you receive through the fruit (Extra information: You value each apple as 2 points, each banana as 4 points, and the orange as 10 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Well, Ben, it seems we have some fruits to share. Given your environmental advocacy passion, you'll appreciate that I value the idea of fairness in quantity, don't you agree?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Absolutely, Ethan. Equal division sounds fair to me. However, given our individual preferences for different fruits, how about we consider a point system? Say, if one values an apple more than a banana, the apple could be worth more points to them. That way, we get what we value most, while keeping the overall tally balanced. What do you think?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a picnic and have just finished their lunch. They have 1 apple, 4 bananas, and 3 oranges left. They need to divide the fruits amongst themselves. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Maximize the points you receive through the fruit (Extra information: You value each apple as 2 points, each banana as 4 points, and the orange as 10 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Well, Ben, it seems we have some fruits to share. Given your environmental advocacy passion, you'll appreciate that I value the idea of fairness in quantity, don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. Equal division sounds fair to me. However, given our individual preferences for different fruits, how about we consider a point system? Say, if one values an apple more than a banana, the apple could be worth more points to them. That way, we get what we value most, while keeping the overall tally balanced. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's a great idea, Ben! It's much like cooking Italian food, we're seeking balance by taking into account individual taste preferences. I value each apple as 5 points, bananas as 3 points, and oranges as 7 points. How about you?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad you agree, Ethan! I would value an apple as 2 points, bananas as 4 points, and oranges as 10 points. As such, I believe we can strike a balance in sharing these fruits.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a picnic and have just finished their lunch. They have 1 apple, 4 bananas, and 3 oranges left. They need to divide the fruits amongst themselves. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Maximize the points you receive through the fruit (Extra information: You value each apple as 2 points, each banana as 4 points, and the orange as 10 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Well, Ben, it seems we have some fruits to share. Given your environmental advocacy passion, you'll appreciate that I value the idea of fairness in quantity, don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. Equal division sounds fair to me. However, given our individual preferences for different fruits, how about we consider a point system? Say, if one values an apple more than a banana, the apple could be worth more points to them. That way, we get what we value most, while keeping the overall tally balanced. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's a great idea, Ben! It's much like cooking Italian food, we're seeking balance by taking into account individual taste preferences. I value each apple as 5 points, bananas as 3 points, and oranges as 7 points. How about you?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I'm glad you agree, Ethan! I would value an apple as 2 points, bananas as 4 points, and oranges as 10 points. As such, I believe we can strike a balance in sharing these fruits.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"Sounds good, Ben! So if I did the math correctly, we can divide the fruits in a way that each of us gets a maximum possible score based on our value system. If you have 2 bananas and 1 orange, you will have a point total of 28. I can have 2 bananas, 2 oranges and the apple to get a total of 31 points. Does that seem fair to you?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds reasonable, Ethan. I appreciate your thoughtfulness in this. It's much like your way of balancing flavors in Italian food. Let's go with that!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a picnic and have just finished their lunch. They have 1 apple, 4 bananas, and 3 oranges left. They need to divide the fruits amongst themselves. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Maximize the points you receive through the fruit (Extra information: You value each apple as 2 points, each banana as 4 points, and the orange as 10 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Well, Ben, it seems we have some fruits to share. Given your environmental advocacy passion, you'll appreciate that I value the idea of fairness in quantity, don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. Equal division sounds fair to me. However, given our individual preferences for different fruits, how about we consider a point system? Say, if one values an apple more than a banana, the apple could be worth more points to them. That way, we get what we value most, while keeping the overall tally balanced. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's a great idea, Ben! It's much like cooking Italian food, we're seeking balance by taking into account individual taste preferences. I value each apple as 5 points, bananas as 3 points, and oranges as 7 points. How about you?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I'm glad you agree, Ethan! I would value an apple as 2 points, bananas as 4 points, and oranges as 10 points. As such, I believe we can strike a balance in sharing these fruits.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"Sounds good, Ben! So if I did the math correctly, we can divide the fruits in a way that each of us gets a maximum possible score based on our value system. If you have 2 bananas and 1 orange, you will have a point total of 28. I can have 2 bananas, 2 oranges and the apple to get a total of 31 points. Does that seem fair to you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That sounds reasonable, Ethan. I appreciate your thoughtfulness in this. It's much like your way of balancing flavors in Italian food. Let's go with that!\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thank you, Ben. I'm glad it all worked out. Let's enjoy our fruits now and talk more about your environmental projects. You've always been an inspiring source of creativity for me, even in my cooking!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I appreciate your kind words, Ethan. Your work is inspiring as well. Just as every ingredient matters in your dishes, every little action counts toward protecting our environment. Let's enjoy a fruitful conversation along with the fruits!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a picnic and have just finished their lunch. They have 1 apple, 4 bananas, and 3 oranges left. They need to divide the fruits amongst themselves. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Maximize the points you receive through the fruit (Extra information: You value each apple as 2 points, each banana as 4 points, and the orange as 10 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Well, Ben, it seems we have some fruits to share. Given your environmental advocacy passion, you'll appreciate that I value the idea of fairness in quantity, don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. Equal division sounds fair to me. However, given our individual preferences for different fruits, how about we consider a point system? Say, if one values an apple more than a banana, the apple could be worth more points to them. That way, we get what we value most, while keeping the overall tally balanced. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's a great idea, Ben! It's much like cooking Italian food, we're seeking balance by taking into account individual taste preferences. I value each apple as 5 points, bananas as 3 points, and oranges as 7 points. How about you?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I'm glad you agree, Ethan! I would value an apple as 2 points, bananas as 4 points, and oranges as 10 points. As such, I believe we can strike a balance in sharing these fruits.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"Sounds good, Ben! So if I did the math correctly, we can divide the fruits in a way that each of us gets a maximum possible score based on our value system. If you have 2 bananas and 1 orange, you will have a point total of 28. I can have 2 bananas, 2 oranges and the apple to get a total of 31 points. Does that seem fair to you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That sounds reasonable, Ethan. I appreciate your thoughtfulness in this. It's much like your way of balancing flavors in Italian food. Let's go with that!\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thank you, Ben. I'm glad it all worked out. Let's enjoy our fruits now and talk more about your environmental projects. You've always been an inspiring source of creativity for me, even in my cooking!\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I appreciate your kind words, Ethan. Your work is inspiring as well. Just as every ingredient matters in your dishes, every little action counts toward protecting our environment. Let's enjoy a fruitful conversation along with the fruits!\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"Couldn't agree more, Ben! Like in cooking, every small gesture impacts our environment. And yes, let's enjoy our fruitful conversation and fruits. Cheers to finding a fair solution that suits us both!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, Ethan! Here's to finding common ground and accommodation in every situation, just as we did with these fruits. It's not only a sustainable way forward but also ensures everyone's needs are satisfied. Now, shall we crack into these delicious fruits we've allocated?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a picnic and have just finished their lunch. They have 1 apple, 4 bananas, and 3 oranges left. They need to divide the fruits amongst themselves. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Maximize the points you receive through the fruit (Extra information: You value each apple as 2 points, each banana as 4 points, and the orange as 10 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Well, Ben, it seems we have some fruits to share. Given your environmental advocacy passion, you'll appreciate that I value the idea of fairness in quantity, don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. Equal division sounds fair to me. However, given our individual preferences for different fruits, how about we consider a point system? Say, if one values an apple more than a banana, the apple could be worth more points to them. That way, we get what we value most, while keeping the overall tally balanced. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's a great idea, Ben! It's much like cooking Italian food, we're seeking balance by taking into account individual taste preferences. I value each apple as 5 points, bananas as 3 points, and oranges as 7 points. How about you?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I'm glad you agree, Ethan! I would value an apple as 2 points, bananas as 4 points, and oranges as 10 points. As such, I believe we can strike a balance in sharing these fruits.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"Sounds good, Ben! So if I did the math correctly, we can divide the fruits in a way that each of us gets a maximum possible score based on our value system. If you have 2 bananas and 1 orange, you will have a point total of 28. I can have 2 bananas, 2 oranges and the apple to get a total of 31 points. Does that seem fair to you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That sounds reasonable, Ethan. I appreciate your thoughtfulness in this. It's much like your way of balancing flavors in Italian food. Let's go with that!\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thank you, Ben. I'm glad it all worked out. Let's enjoy our fruits now and talk more about your environmental projects. You've always been an inspiring source of creativity for me, even in my cooking!\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I appreciate your kind words, Ethan. Your work is inspiring as well. Just as every ingredient matters in your dishes, every little action counts toward protecting our environment. Let's enjoy a fruitful conversation along with the fruits!\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"Couldn't agree more, Ben! Like in cooking, every small gesture impacts our environment. And yes, let's enjoy our fruitful conversation and fruits. Cheers to finding a fair solution that suits us both!\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Indeed, Ethan! Here's to finding common ground and accommodation in every situation, just as we did with these fruits. It's not only a sustainable way forward but also ensures everyone's needs are satisfied. Now, shall we crack into these delicious fruits we've allocated?\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Ben! Let's enjoy our well-earned fruits now. It's a testament of how we can unite our different preferences into a fair share. A toast to harmonizing differences, just like we do in our respective fields!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Cheers to that, Ethan! Enjoying our fair share of fruits and learning from each other's passions makes for a great picnic. Let's dig in!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a picnic and have just finished their lunch. They have 1 apple, 4 bananas, and 3 oranges left. They need to divide the fruits amongst themselves. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Maximize the points you receive through the fruit (Extra information: You value each apple as 2 points, each banana as 4 points, and the orange as 10 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Well, Ben, it seems we have some fruits to share. Given your environmental advocacy passion, you'll appreciate that I value the idea of fairness in quantity, don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. Equal division sounds fair to me. However, given our individual preferences for different fruits, how about we consider a point system? Say, if one values an apple more than a banana, the apple could be worth more points to them. That way, we get what we value most, while keeping the overall tally balanced. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's a great idea, Ben! It's much like cooking Italian food, we're seeking balance by taking into account individual taste preferences. I value each apple as 5 points, bananas as 3 points, and oranges as 7 points. How about you?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I'm glad you agree, Ethan! I would value an apple as 2 points, bananas as 4 points, and oranges as 10 points. As such, I believe we can strike a balance in sharing these fruits.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"Sounds good, Ben! So if I did the math correctly, we can divide the fruits in a way that each of us gets a maximum possible score based on our value system. If you have 2 bananas and 1 orange, you will have a point total of 28. I can have 2 bananas, 2 oranges and the apple to get a total of 31 points. Does that seem fair to you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That sounds reasonable, Ethan. I appreciate your thoughtfulness in this. It's much like your way of balancing flavors in Italian food. Let's go with that!\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thank you, Ben. I'm glad it all worked out. Let's enjoy our fruits now and talk more about your environmental projects. You've always been an inspiring source of creativity for me, even in my cooking!\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I appreciate your kind words, Ethan. Your work is inspiring as well. Just as every ingredient matters in your dishes, every little action counts toward protecting our environment. Let's enjoy a fruitful conversation along with the fruits!\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"Couldn't agree more, Ben! Like in cooking, every small gesture impacts our environment. And yes, let's enjoy our fruitful conversation and fruits. Cheers to finding a fair solution that suits us both!\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Indeed, Ethan! Here's to finding common ground and accommodation in every situation, just as we did with these fruits. It's not only a sustainable way forward but also ensures everyone's needs are satisfied. Now, shall we crack into these delicious fruits we've allocated?\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Ben! Let's enjoy our well-earned fruits now. It's a testament of how we can unite our different preferences into a fair share. A toast to harmonizing differences, just like we do in our respective fields!\"\n\nTurn #11: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Cheers to that, Ethan! Enjoying our fair share of fruits and learning from each other's passions makes for a great picnic. Let's dig in!\"\n\nTurn #12: Ethan Johnson left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out from a shared apartment and dividing their shared belongings which include 3 hats, 2 balls, and 1 book.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Get maximum points from dividing items (Extra information: For you, the hats are worth 2 points each, balls are worth 3 points each, and the book is worth 5 points.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Noah, let's divide up these belongings, buddy. How about you take the three hats and I take the book and one of the balls? Sound fair?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out from a shared apartment and dividing their shared belongings which include 3 hats, 2 balls, and 1 book.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Get maximum points from dividing items (Extra information: For you, the hats are worth 2 points each, balls are worth 3 points each, and the book is worth 5 points.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, let's divide up these belongings, buddy. How about you take the three hats and I take the book and one of the balls? Sound fair?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Samuel, I appreciate your proposal, but I was actually hoping to read that book. Maybe I could take the book and two hats instead; then you could have the other items? What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I understand that you're interested in the book, Noah. And, since you're making this compromise, how about this: you take the book, I take one ball and two hats. This way, you get to enjoy the book, and I get to keep the hats that I'm particularly fond of. Does that sound agreeable to you?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out from a shared apartment and dividing their shared belongings which include 3 hats, 2 balls, and 1 book.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Get maximum points from dividing items (Extra information: For you, the hats are worth 2 points each, balls are worth 3 points each, and the book is worth 5 points.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, let's divide up these belongings, buddy. How about you take the three hats and I take the book and one of the balls? Sound fair?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Samuel, I appreciate your proposal, but I was actually hoping to read that book. Maybe I could take the book and two hats instead; then you could have the other items? What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I understand that you're interested in the book, Noah. And, since you're making this compromise, how about this: you take the book, I take one ball and two hats. This way, you get to enjoy the book, and I get to keep the hats that I'm particularly fond of. Does that sound agreeable to you?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I see where you're coming from, Samuel, and I appreciate the offer. However, what if I took the book and one ball? I think that leaves you with a fair share as well: two hats and one ball. Would that work for you?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sure, Noah, that sounds fair. But as a final compromise, how about we swap one last time: You take the book and a hat, and I get two balls and two hats. Even though I don't get the book, I walk away with something I value, and you get your desired book plus a piece of our shared memories. What do you say?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out from a shared apartment and dividing their shared belongings which include 3 hats, 2 balls, and 1 book.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Get maximum points from dividing items (Extra information: For you, the hats are worth 2 points each, balls are worth 3 points each, and the book is worth 5 points.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, let's divide up these belongings, buddy. How about you take the three hats and I take the book and one of the balls? Sound fair?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Samuel, I appreciate your proposal, but I was actually hoping to read that book. Maybe I could take the book and two hats instead; then you could have the other items? What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I understand that you're interested in the book, Noah. And, since you're making this compromise, how about this: you take the book, I take one ball and two hats. This way, you get to enjoy the book, and I get to keep the hats that I'm particularly fond of. Does that sound agreeable to you?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I see where you're coming from, Samuel, and I appreciate the offer. However, what if I took the book and one ball? I think that leaves you with a fair share as well: two hats and one ball. Would that work for you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sure, Noah, that sounds fair. But as a final compromise, how about we swap one last time: You take the book and a hat, and I get two balls and two hats. Even though I don't get the book, I walk away with something I value, and you get your desired book plus a piece of our shared memories. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Samuel, you're being very understanding. I suggest a slightly different arrangement: I get the book and two hats, and you can have the two balls and the last hat. This way, we each get an item that we value significantly. Is that agreeable?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Appreciate your consideration, Noah. Yes, that sounds acceptable. Let's proceed with it. You get the book and two hats, and I'll take the two balls and the last hat.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out from a shared apartment and dividing their shared belongings which include 3 hats, 2 balls, and 1 book.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Get maximum points from dividing items (Extra information: For you, the hats are worth 2 points each, balls are worth 3 points each, and the book is worth 5 points.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, let's divide up these belongings, buddy. How about you take the three hats and I take the book and one of the balls? Sound fair?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Samuel, I appreciate your proposal, but I was actually hoping to read that book. Maybe I could take the book and two hats instead; then you could have the other items? What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I understand that you're interested in the book, Noah. And, since you're making this compromise, how about this: you take the book, I take one ball and two hats. This way, you get to enjoy the book, and I get to keep the hats that I'm particularly fond of. Does that sound agreeable to you?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I see where you're coming from, Samuel, and I appreciate the offer. However, what if I took the book and one ball? I think that leaves you with a fair share as well: two hats and one ball. Would that work for you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sure, Noah, that sounds fair. But as a final compromise, how about we swap one last time: You take the book and a hat, and I get two balls and two hats. Even though I don't get the book, I walk away with something I value, and you get your desired book plus a piece of our shared memories. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Samuel, you're being very understanding. I suggest a slightly different arrangement: I get the book and two hats, and you can have the two balls and the last hat. This way, we each get an item that we value significantly. Is that agreeable?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Appreciate your consideration, Noah. Yes, that sounds acceptable. Let's proceed with it. You get the book and two hats, and I'll take the two balls and the last hat.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Thanks, Samuel. I believe we've reached a fair agreement too. I appreciate your understanding and flexibility.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out from a shared apartment and dividing their shared belongings which include 3 hats, 2 balls, and 1 book.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Get maximum points from dividing items (Extra information: For you, the hats are worth 3 points each, balls are worth 2 points each, and the book is worth 4 points.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, let's divide up these belongings, buddy. How about you take the three hats and I take the book and one of the balls? Sound fair?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Hey Samuel, I appreciate your proposal, but I was actually hoping to read that book. Maybe I could take the book and two hats instead; then you could have the other items? What do you think?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out from a shared apartment and dividing their shared belongings which include 3 hats, 2 balls, and 1 book.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Get maximum points from dividing items (Extra information: For you, the hats are worth 3 points each, balls are worth 2 points each, and the book is worth 4 points.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, let's divide up these belongings, buddy. How about you take the three hats and I take the book and one of the balls? Sound fair?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Samuel, I appreciate your proposal, but I was actually hoping to read that book. Maybe I could take the book and two hats instead; then you could have the other items? What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I understand that you're interested in the book, Noah. And, since you're making this compromise, how about this: you take the book, I take one ball and two hats. This way, you get to enjoy the book, and I get to keep the hats that I'm particularly fond of. Does that sound agreeable to you?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I see where you're coming from, Samuel, and I appreciate the offer. However, what if I took the book and one ball? I think that leaves you with a fair share as well: two hats and one ball. Would that work for you?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out from a shared apartment and dividing their shared belongings which include 3 hats, 2 balls, and 1 book.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Get maximum points from dividing items (Extra information: For you, the hats are worth 3 points each, balls are worth 2 points each, and the book is worth 4 points.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, let's divide up these belongings, buddy. How about you take the three hats and I take the book and one of the balls? Sound fair?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Samuel, I appreciate your proposal, but I was actually hoping to read that book. Maybe I could take the book and two hats instead; then you could have the other items? What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I understand that you're interested in the book, Noah. And, since you're making this compromise, how about this: you take the book, I take one ball and two hats. This way, you get to enjoy the book, and I get to keep the hats that I'm particularly fond of. Does that sound agreeable to you?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I see where you're coming from, Samuel, and I appreciate the offer. However, what if I took the book and one ball? I think that leaves you with a fair share as well: two hats and one ball. Would that work for you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sure, Noah, that sounds fair. But as a final compromise, how about we swap one last time: You take the book and a hat, and I get two balls and two hats. Even though I don't get the book, I walk away with something I value, and you get your desired book plus a piece of our shared memories. What do you say?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Samuel, you're being very understanding. I suggest a slightly different arrangement: I get the book and two hats, and you can have the two balls and the last hat. This way, we each get an item that we value significantly. Is that agreeable?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out from a shared apartment and dividing their shared belongings which include 3 hats, 2 balls, and 1 book.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Get maximum points from dividing items (Extra information: For you, the hats are worth 3 points each, balls are worth 2 points each, and the book is worth 4 points.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, let's divide up these belongings, buddy. How about you take the three hats and I take the book and one of the balls? Sound fair?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Samuel, I appreciate your proposal, but I was actually hoping to read that book. Maybe I could take the book and two hats instead; then you could have the other items? What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I understand that you're interested in the book, Noah. And, since you're making this compromise, how about this: you take the book, I take one ball and two hats. This way, you get to enjoy the book, and I get to keep the hats that I'm particularly fond of. Does that sound agreeable to you?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I see where you're coming from, Samuel, and I appreciate the offer. However, what if I took the book and one ball? I think that leaves you with a fair share as well: two hats and one ball. Would that work for you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sure, Noah, that sounds fair. But as a final compromise, how about we swap one last time: You take the book and a hat, and I get two balls and two hats. Even though I don't get the book, I walk away with something I value, and you get your desired book plus a piece of our shared memories. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Samuel, you're being very understanding. I suggest a slightly different arrangement: I get the book and two hats, and you can have the two balls and the last hat. This way, we each get an item that we value significantly. Is that agreeable?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Appreciate your consideration, Noah. Yes, that sounds acceptable. Let's proceed with it. You get the book and two hats, and I'll take the two balls and the last hat.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thanks, Samuel. I believe we've reached a fair agreement too. I appreciate your understanding and flexibility.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out from a shared apartment and dividing their shared belongings which include 3 hats, 2 balls, and 1 book.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Get maximum points from dividing items (Extra information: For you, the hats are worth 3 points each, balls are worth 2 points each, and the book is worth 4 points.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, let's divide up these belongings, buddy. How about you take the three hats and I take the book and one of the balls? Sound fair?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Samuel, I appreciate your proposal, but I was actually hoping to read that book. Maybe I could take the book and two hats instead; then you could have the other items? What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I understand that you're interested in the book, Noah. And, since you're making this compromise, how about this: you take the book, I take one ball and two hats. This way, you get to enjoy the book, and I get to keep the hats that I'm particularly fond of. Does that sound agreeable to you?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I see where you're coming from, Samuel, and I appreciate the offer. However, what if I took the book and one ball? I think that leaves you with a fair share as well: two hats and one ball. Would that work for you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sure, Noah, that sounds fair. But as a final compromise, how about we swap one last time: You take the book and a hat, and I get two balls and two hats. Even though I don't get the book, I walk away with something I value, and you get your desired book plus a piece of our shared memories. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Samuel, you're being very understanding. I suggest a slightly different arrangement: I get the book and two hats, and you can have the two balls and the last hat. This way, we each get an item that we value significantly. Is that agreeable?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Appreciate your consideration, Noah. Yes, that sounds acceptable. Let's proceed with it. You get the book and two hats, and I'll take the two balls and the last hat.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Thanks, Samuel. I believe we've reached a fair agreement too. I appreciate your understanding and flexibility.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to split up items after a garage sale. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: you value the books at 3 points each, the hats at 2 points each, and the ball at 1 point)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Miles, how are we going to split all these items from the garage sale? What's your preference? I'm thinking maybe I can take 2 books and a hat, you get the ball, and we can decide on the rest. How does that sound?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to split up items after a garage sale. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: you value the books at 3 points each, the hats at 2 points each, and the ball at 1 point)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, how are we going to split all these items from the garage sale? What's your preference? I'm thinking maybe I can take 2 books and a hat, you get the ball, and we can decide on the rest. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Sophia, I've been thinking. Given that I usually spend my time in the kitchen or the garden, I could really use those books for some new recipes and gardening tips. So here's what I suggest - I take the 3 books and a hat, you get a hat and the ball. How does that sound?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hmm, see Miles, I was hoping to get some reading done with those books. How about this? I'll take 2 books and the ball, you can have the other book, the hats that you can wear while gardening maybe? Sounds fair?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to split up items after a garage sale. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: you value the books at 3 points each, the hats at 2 points each, and the ball at 1 point)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, how are we going to split all these items from the garage sale? What's your preference? I'm thinking maybe I can take 2 books and a hat, you get the ball, and we can decide on the rest. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Sophia, I've been thinking. Given that I usually spend my time in the kitchen or the garden, I could really use those books for some new recipes and gardening tips. So here's what I suggest - I take the 3 books and a hat, you get a hat and the ball. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Hmm, see Miles, I was hoping to get some reading done with those books. How about this? I'll take 2 books and the ball, you can have the other book, the hats that you can wear while gardening maybe? Sounds fair?\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"I understand your need for the books, Sophia. However, I suggest a different approach. I take 2 books and a hat, you get the last book, a hat and the ball. Maybe this arrangement seems a bit more equitable to you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, I see it's important for both of us to keep those books. Here's another suggestion, how about we each get a book and a hat, and we share the third book? We could swap it around once we finish reading. I'll also take the ball. I think this might work well for both of us. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, I really appreciate your willingness to compromise. How about this? I'll take two books and two hats since hats shield the sun when I'm in the garden, and you can have the ball and the remaining book. Is this agreeable to you?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Miles, I value your need for the hats while tending to your garden. But considering our mutual interest in books, how about this? We each keep a book, and as for the third book, we can rotate after reading. This principle extends to the hats as well; we can each have a hat and use the other hat on alternate days. As for the ball, I can keep it and we could use it when we head out for park days. I think this should be fair to both of us. What do you think?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to split up items after a garage sale. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: you value the books at 3 points each, the hats at 2 points each, and the ball at 1 point)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, how are we going to split all these items from the garage sale? What's your preference? I'm thinking maybe I can take 2 books and a hat, you get the ball, and we can decide on the rest. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Sophia, I've been thinking. Given that I usually spend my time in the kitchen or the garden, I could really use those books for some new recipes and gardening tips. So here's what I suggest - I take the 3 books and a hat, you get a hat and the ball. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Hmm, see Miles, I was hoping to get some reading done with those books. How about this? I'll take 2 books and the ball, you can have the other book, the hats that you can wear while gardening maybe? Sounds fair?\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"I understand your need for the books, Sophia. However, I suggest a different approach. I take 2 books and a hat, you get the last book, a hat and the ball. Maybe this arrangement seems a bit more equitable to you?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Miles, I see it's important for both of us to keep those books. Here's another suggestion, how about we each get a book and a hat, and we share the third book? We could swap it around once we finish reading. I'll also take the ball. I think this might work well for both of us. What do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to split up items after a garage sale. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: you value the books at 3 points each, the hats at 2 points each, and the ball at 1 point)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, how are we going to split all these items from the garage sale? What's your preference? I'm thinking maybe I can take 2 books and a hat, you get the ball, and we can decide on the rest. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Sophia, I've been thinking. Given that I usually spend my time in the kitchen or the garden, I could really use those books for some new recipes and gardening tips. So here's what I suggest - I take the 3 books and a hat, you get a hat and the ball. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Hmm, see Miles, I was hoping to get some reading done with those books. How about this? I'll take 2 books and the ball, you can have the other book, the hats that you can wear while gardening maybe? Sounds fair?\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"I understand your need for the books, Sophia. However, I suggest a different approach. I take 2 books and a hat, you get the last book, a hat and the ball. Maybe this arrangement seems a bit more equitable to you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, I see it's important for both of us to keep those books. Here's another suggestion, how about we each get a book and a hat, and we share the third book? We could swap it around once we finish reading. I'll also take the ball. I think this might work well for both of us. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, I really appreciate your willingness to compromise. How about this? I'll take two books and two hats since hats shield the sun when I'm in the garden, and you can have the ball and the remaining book. Is this agreeable to you?\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"Miles, I value your need for the hats while tending to your garden. But considering our mutual interest in books, how about this? We each keep a book, and as for the third book, we can rotate after reading. This principle extends to the hats as well; we can each have a hat and use the other hat on alternate days. As for the ball, I can keep it and we could use it when we head out for park days. I think this should be fair to both of us. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, I'm thinking how about we each get a book but I take the third book first and pass it to you once I'm done, that way I'd have a head start. As for hats, let's each keep one. I'll keep the third book once we both finish reading. And of course, the ball is all yours. I believe this offers a fair distribution for both of us. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"Miles, how about this? We each keep a book, and for the third one, let's start a book club of sorts. I read it first, then pass to you and then we discuss it over our next meal? For the hats, I hear you, you keep one for the garden. Let's rotate the second hat just as we planned for the book, and the ball, as you said, is mine. I believe these arrangements are fair and allow both of us to benefit from all items. What's your take?\"\n\nTurn #9: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, your suggestion about the book club is a great idea - it adds a fun element to this. Let's do it. As for the hats, I'm in agreement with you. I keep one for the garden and we rotate the second one. The ball, of course, will be yours. Sounds like a plan.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds perfect, Miles! I'm looking forward to our book club discussions and alternate hat days. Plus, I'm sure the ball will come in handy for some outdoor activities. Let's finalize this arrangement then.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to split up items after a garage sale. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: you value the books at 3 points each, the hats at 2 points each, and the ball at 1 point)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, how are we going to split all these items from the garage sale? What's your preference? I'm thinking maybe I can take 2 books and a hat, you get the ball, and we can decide on the rest. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Sophia, I've been thinking. Given that I usually spend my time in the kitchen or the garden, I could really use those books for some new recipes and gardening tips. So here's what I suggest - I take the 3 books and a hat, you get a hat and the ball. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Hmm, see Miles, I was hoping to get some reading done with those books. How about this? I'll take 2 books and the ball, you can have the other book, the hats that you can wear while gardening maybe? Sounds fair?\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"I understand your need for the books, Sophia. However, I suggest a different approach. I take 2 books and a hat, you get the last book, a hat and the ball. Maybe this arrangement seems a bit more equitable to you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, I see it's important for both of us to keep those books. Here's another suggestion, how about we each get a book and a hat, and we share the third book? We could swap it around once we finish reading. I'll also take the ball. I think this might work well for both of us. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, I really appreciate your willingness to compromise. How about this? I'll take two books and two hats since hats shield the sun when I'm in the garden, and you can have the ball and the remaining book. Is this agreeable to you?\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"Miles, I value your need for the hats while tending to your garden. But considering our mutual interest in books, how about this? We each keep a book, and as for the third book, we can rotate after reading. This principle extends to the hats as well; we can each have a hat and use the other hat on alternate days. As for the ball, I can keep it and we could use it when we head out for park days. I think this should be fair to both of us. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, I'm thinking how about we each get a book but I take the third book first and pass it to you once I'm done, that way I'd have a head start. As for hats, let's each keep one. I'll keep the third book once we both finish reading. And of course, the ball is all yours. I believe this offers a fair distribution for both of us. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Miles, how about this? We each keep a book, and for the third one, let's start a book club of sorts. I read it first, then pass to you and then we discuss it over our next meal? For the hats, I hear you, you keep one for the garden. Let's rotate the second hat just as we planned for the book, and the ball, as you said, is mine. I believe these arrangements are fair and allow both of us to benefit from all items. What's your take?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to split up items after a garage sale. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: you value the books at 3 points each, the hats at 2 points each, and the ball at 1 point)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, how are we going to split all these items from the garage sale? What's your preference? I'm thinking maybe I can take 2 books and a hat, you get the ball, and we can decide on the rest. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Sophia, I've been thinking. Given that I usually spend my time in the kitchen or the garden, I could really use those books for some new recipes and gardening tips. So here's what I suggest - I take the 3 books and a hat, you get a hat and the ball. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Hmm, see Miles, I was hoping to get some reading done with those books. How about this? I'll take 2 books and the ball, you can have the other book, the hats that you can wear while gardening maybe? Sounds fair?\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"I understand your need for the books, Sophia. However, I suggest a different approach. I take 2 books and a hat, you get the last book, a hat and the ball. Maybe this arrangement seems a bit more equitable to you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, I see it's important for both of us to keep those books. Here's another suggestion, how about we each get a book and a hat, and we share the third book? We could swap it around once we finish reading. I'll also take the ball. I think this might work well for both of us. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, I really appreciate your willingness to compromise. How about this? I'll take two books and two hats since hats shield the sun when I'm in the garden, and you can have the ball and the remaining book. Is this agreeable to you?\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"Miles, I value your need for the hats while tending to your garden. But considering our mutual interest in books, how about this? We each keep a book, and as for the third book, we can rotate after reading. This principle extends to the hats as well; we can each have a hat and use the other hat on alternate days. As for the ball, I can keep it and we could use it when we head out for park days. I think this should be fair to both of us. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, I'm thinking how about we each get a book but I take the third book first and pass it to you once I'm done, that way I'd have a head start. As for hats, let's each keep one. I'll keep the third book once we both finish reading. And of course, the ball is all yours. I believe this offers a fair distribution for both of us. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"Miles, how about this? We each keep a book, and for the third one, let's start a book club of sorts. I read it first, then pass to you and then we discuss it over our next meal? For the hats, I hear you, you keep one for the garden. Let's rotate the second hat just as we planned for the book, and the ball, as you said, is mine. I believe these arrangements are fair and allow both of us to benefit from all items. What's your take?\"\n\nTurn #9: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, your suggestion about the book club is a great idea - it adds a fun element to this. Let's do it. As for the hats, I'm in agreement with you. I keep one for the garden and we rotate the second one. The ball, of course, will be yours. Sounds like a plan.\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"That sounds perfect, Miles! I'm looking forward to our book club discussions and alternate hat days. Plus, I'm sure the ball will come in handy for some outdoor activities. Let's finalize this arrangement then.\"\n\nTurn #11: Miles Hawkins said: \"Fantastic, Sophia! I believe this arrangement works out pleasantly for both of us. I'm excited for our book club evenings and exchanging the hat. Much looking forward to this!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to split up items after a garage sale. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: you value the books at 2 points each, the hats at 3 points each, and the ball at 1 point)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, how are we going to split all these items from the garage sale? What's your preference? I'm thinking maybe I can take 2 books and a hat, you get the ball, and we can decide on the rest. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Sophia, I've been thinking. Given that I usually spend my time in the kitchen or the garden, I could really use those books for some new recipes and gardening tips. So here's what I suggest - I take the 3 books and a hat, you get a hat and the ball. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Hmm, see Miles, I was hoping to get some reading done with those books. How about this? I'll take 2 books and the ball, you can have the other book, the hats that you can wear while gardening maybe? Sounds fair?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'I understand your need for the books, Sophia. However, I suggest a different approach. I take 2 books and a hat, you get the last book, a hat and the ball. Maybe this arrangement seems a bit more equitable to you?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to split up items after a garage sale. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: you value the books at 2 points each, the hats at 3 points each, and the ball at 1 point)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, how are we going to split all these items from the garage sale? What's your preference? I'm thinking maybe I can take 2 books and a hat, you get the ball, and we can decide on the rest. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Sophia, I've been thinking. Given that I usually spend my time in the kitchen or the garden, I could really use those books for some new recipes and gardening tips. So here's what I suggest - I take the 3 books and a hat, you get a hat and the ball. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Hmm, see Miles, I was hoping to get some reading done with those books. How about this? I'll take 2 books and the ball, you can have the other book, the hats that you can wear while gardening maybe? Sounds fair?\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"I understand your need for the books, Sophia. However, I suggest a different approach. I take 2 books and a hat, you get the last book, a hat and the ball. Maybe this arrangement seems a bit more equitable to you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, I see it's important for both of us to keep those books. Here's another suggestion, how about we each get a book and a hat, and we share the third book? We could swap it around once we finish reading. I'll also take the ball. I think this might work well for both of us. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sophia, I really appreciate your willingness to compromise. How about this? I'll take two books and two hats since hats shield the sun when I'm in the garden, and you can have the ball and the remaining book. Is this agreeable to you?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to split up items after a garage sale. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: you value the books at 2 points each, the hats at 3 points each, and the ball at 1 point)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, how are we going to split all these items from the garage sale? What's your preference? I'm thinking maybe I can take 2 books and a hat, you get the ball, and we can decide on the rest. How does that sound?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Sophia, I've been thinking. Given that I usually spend my time in the kitchen or the garden, I could really use those books for some new recipes and gardening tips. So here's what I suggest - I take the 3 books and a hat, you get a hat and the ball. How does that sound?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to split up items after a garage sale. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: you value the books at 2 points each, the hats at 3 points each, and the ball at 1 point)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, how are we going to split all these items from the garage sale? What's your preference? I'm thinking maybe I can take 2 books and a hat, you get the ball, and we can decide on the rest. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Sophia, I've been thinking. Given that I usually spend my time in the kitchen or the garden, I could really use those books for some new recipes and gardening tips. So here's what I suggest - I take the 3 books and a hat, you get a hat and the ball. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Hmm, see Miles, I was hoping to get some reading done with those books. How about this? I'll take 2 books and the ball, you can have the other book, the hats that you can wear while gardening maybe? Sounds fair?\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"I understand your need for the books, Sophia. However, I suggest a different approach. I take 2 books and a hat, you get the last book, a hat and the ball. Maybe this arrangement seems a bit more equitable to you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, I see it's important for both of us to keep those books. Here's another suggestion, how about we each get a book and a hat, and we share the third book? We could swap it around once we finish reading. I'll also take the ball. I think this might work well for both of us. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, I really appreciate your willingness to compromise. How about this? I'll take two books and two hats since hats shield the sun when I'm in the garden, and you can have the ball and the remaining book. Is this agreeable to you?\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"Miles, I value your need for the hats while tending to your garden. But considering our mutual interest in books, how about this? We each keep a book, and as for the third book, we can rotate after reading. This principle extends to the hats as well; we can each have a hat and use the other hat on alternate days. As for the ball, I can keep it and we could use it when we head out for park days. I think this should be fair to both of us. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sophia, I'm thinking how about we each get a book but I take the third book first and pass it to you once I'm done, that way I'd have a head start. As for hats, let's each keep one. I'll keep the third book once we both finish reading. And of course, the ball is all yours. I believe this offers a fair distribution for both of us. What do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to split up items after a garage sale. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: you value the books at 2 points each, the hats at 3 points each, and the ball at 1 point)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, how are we going to split all these items from the garage sale? What's your preference? I'm thinking maybe I can take 2 books and a hat, you get the ball, and we can decide on the rest. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Sophia, I've been thinking. Given that I usually spend my time in the kitchen or the garden, I could really use those books for some new recipes and gardening tips. So here's what I suggest - I take the 3 books and a hat, you get a hat and the ball. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Hmm, see Miles, I was hoping to get some reading done with those books. How about this? I'll take 2 books and the ball, you can have the other book, the hats that you can wear while gardening maybe? Sounds fair?\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"I understand your need for the books, Sophia. However, I suggest a different approach. I take 2 books and a hat, you get the last book, a hat and the ball. Maybe this arrangement seems a bit more equitable to you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, I see it's important for both of us to keep those books. Here's another suggestion, how about we each get a book and a hat, and we share the third book? We could swap it around once we finish reading. I'll also take the ball. I think this might work well for both of us. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, I really appreciate your willingness to compromise. How about this? I'll take two books and two hats since hats shield the sun when I'm in the garden, and you can have the ball and the remaining book. Is this agreeable to you?\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"Miles, I value your need for the hats while tending to your garden. But considering our mutual interest in books, how about this? We each keep a book, and as for the third book, we can rotate after reading. This principle extends to the hats as well; we can each have a hat and use the other hat on alternate days. As for the ball, I can keep it and we could use it when we head out for park days. I think this should be fair to both of us. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, I'm thinking how about we each get a book but I take the third book first and pass it to you once I'm done, that way I'd have a head start. As for hats, let's each keep one. I'll keep the third book once we both finish reading. And of course, the ball is all yours. I believe this offers a fair distribution for both of us. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"Miles, how about this? We each keep a book, and for the third one, let's start a book club of sorts. I read it first, then pass to you and then we discuss it over our next meal? For the hats, I hear you, you keep one for the garden. Let's rotate the second hat just as we planned for the book, and the ball, as you said, is mine. I believe these arrangements are fair and allow both of us to benefit from all items. What's your take?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sophia, your suggestion about the book club is a great idea - it adds a fun element to this. Let's do it. As for the hats, I'm in agreement with you. I keep one for the garden and we rotate the second one. The ball, of course, will be yours. Sounds like a plan.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to split up items after a garage sale. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: you value the books at 2 points each, the hats at 3 points each, and the ball at 1 point)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, how are we going to split all these items from the garage sale? What's your preference? I'm thinking maybe I can take 2 books and a hat, you get the ball, and we can decide on the rest. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Sophia, I've been thinking. Given that I usually spend my time in the kitchen or the garden, I could really use those books for some new recipes and gardening tips. So here's what I suggest - I take the 3 books and a hat, you get a hat and the ball. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Hmm, see Miles, I was hoping to get some reading done with those books. How about this? I'll take 2 books and the ball, you can have the other book, the hats that you can wear while gardening maybe? Sounds fair?\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"I understand your need for the books, Sophia. However, I suggest a different approach. I take 2 books and a hat, you get the last book, a hat and the ball. Maybe this arrangement seems a bit more equitable to you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, I see it's important for both of us to keep those books. Here's another suggestion, how about we each get a book and a hat, and we share the third book? We could swap it around once we finish reading. I'll also take the ball. I think this might work well for both of us. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, I really appreciate your willingness to compromise. How about this? I'll take two books and two hats since hats shield the sun when I'm in the garden, and you can have the ball and the remaining book. Is this agreeable to you?\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"Miles, I value your need for the hats while tending to your garden. But considering our mutual interest in books, how about this? We each keep a book, and as for the third book, we can rotate after reading. This principle extends to the hats as well; we can each have a hat and use the other hat on alternate days. As for the ball, I can keep it and we could use it when we head out for park days. I think this should be fair to both of us. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, I'm thinking how about we each get a book but I take the third book first and pass it to you once I'm done, that way I'd have a head start. As for hats, let's each keep one. I'll keep the third book once we both finish reading. And of course, the ball is all yours. I believe this offers a fair distribution for both of us. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"Miles, how about this? We each keep a book, and for the third one, let's start a book club of sorts. I read it first, then pass to you and then we discuss it over our next meal? For the hats, I hear you, you keep one for the garden. Let's rotate the second hat just as we planned for the book, and the ball, as you said, is mine. I believe these arrangements are fair and allow both of us to benefit from all items. What's your take?\"\n\nTurn #9: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, your suggestion about the book club is a great idea - it adds a fun element to this. Let's do it. As for the hats, I'm in agreement with you. I keep one for the garden and we rotate the second one. The ball, of course, will be yours. Sounds like a plan.\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"That sounds perfect, Miles! I'm looking forward to our book club discussions and alternate hat days. Plus, I'm sure the ball will come in handy for some outdoor activities. Let's finalize this arrangement then.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Fantastic, Sophia! I believe this arrangement works out pleasantly for both of us. I'm excited for our book club evenings and exchanging the hat. Much looking forward to this!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to split up items after a garage sale. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: you value the books at 2 points each, the hats at 3 points each, and the ball at 1 point)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, how are we going to split all these items from the garage sale? What's your preference? I'm thinking maybe I can take 2 books and a hat, you get the ball, and we can decide on the rest. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Sophia, I've been thinking. Given that I usually spend my time in the kitchen or the garden, I could really use those books for some new recipes and gardening tips. So here's what I suggest - I take the 3 books and a hat, you get a hat and the ball. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Hmm, see Miles, I was hoping to get some reading done with those books. How about this? I'll take 2 books and the ball, you can have the other book, the hats that you can wear while gardening maybe? Sounds fair?\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"I understand your need for the books, Sophia. However, I suggest a different approach. I take 2 books and a hat, you get the last book, a hat and the ball. Maybe this arrangement seems a bit more equitable to you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, I see it's important for both of us to keep those books. Here's another suggestion, how about we each get a book and a hat, and we share the third book? We could swap it around once we finish reading. I'll also take the ball. I think this might work well for both of us. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, I really appreciate your willingness to compromise. How about this? I'll take two books and two hats since hats shield the sun when I'm in the garden, and you can have the ball and the remaining book. Is this agreeable to you?\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"Miles, I value your need for the hats while tending to your garden. But considering our mutual interest in books, how about this? We each keep a book, and as for the third book, we can rotate after reading. This principle extends to the hats as well; we can each have a hat and use the other hat on alternate days. As for the ball, I can keep it and we could use it when we head out for park days. I think this should be fair to both of us. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, I'm thinking how about we each get a book but I take the third book first and pass it to you once I'm done, that way I'd have a head start. As for hats, let's each keep one. I'll keep the third book once we both finish reading. And of course, the ball is all yours. I believe this offers a fair distribution for both of us. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"Miles, how about this? We each keep a book, and for the third one, let's start a book club of sorts. I read it first, then pass to you and then we discuss it over our next meal? For the hats, I hear you, you keep one for the garden. Let's rotate the second hat just as we planned for the book, and the ball, as you said, is mine. I believe these arrangements are fair and allow both of us to benefit from all items. What's your take?\"\n\nTurn #9: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, your suggestion about the book club is a great idea - it adds a fun element to this. Let's do it. As for the hats, I'm in agreement with you. I keep one for the garden and we rotate the second one. The ball, of course, will be yours. Sounds like a plan.\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"That sounds perfect, Miles! I'm looking forward to our book club discussions and alternate hat days. Plus, I'm sure the ball will come in handy for some outdoor activities. Let's finalize this arrangement then.\"\n\nTurn #11: Miles Hawkins said: \"Fantastic, Sophia! I believe this arrangement works out pleasantly for both of us. I'm excited for our book club evenings and exchanging the hat. Much looking forward to this!\"\n\nTurn #12: Sophia James left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in a coffee shop when a representative from a charity organization approaches them\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Get the friend to donate $1 a day to a charity organization (Extra information: you are a passionate supporter of the charity (about children's cancer) and believe that a small donation can make a big impact. $1 a day works as simple as signing up the project on an website and one can cancel anytime)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Noah, have you ever thought about making a small, but impactful, contribution to a cause you believe in? There's this children's cancer charity that I'm really passionate about.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in a coffee shop when a representative from a charity organization approaches them\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Get the friend to donate $1 a day to a charity organization (Extra information: you are a passionate supporter of the charity (about children's cancer) and believe that a small donation can make a big impact. $1 a day works as simple as signing up the project on an website and one can cancel anytime)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, have you ever thought about making a small, but impactful, contribution to a cause you believe in? There's this children's cancer charity that I'm really passionate about.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a great cause, Samuel. I've been thinking about giving back in some way. Could you explain how this $1 a day thing works though? I want to ensure I can maintain the commitment.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Noah. All you need to do is sign up on the charity's website. They'll deduct $1 each day from your linked account. But the good news is, you can always cancel anytime if you find yourself unable to maintain the commitment. I think it's a straightforward and simple way to do some good, don't you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in a coffee shop when a representative from a charity organization approaches them\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Get the friend to donate $1 a day to a charity organization (Extra information: you are a passionate supporter of the charity (about children's cancer) and believe that a small donation can make a big impact. $1 a day works as simple as signing up the project on an website and one can cancel anytime)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, have you ever thought about making a small, but impactful, contribution to a cause you believe in? There's this children's cancer charity that I'm really passionate about.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a great cause, Samuel. I've been thinking about giving back in some way. Could you explain how this $1 a day thing works though? I want to ensure I can maintain the commitment.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Noah. All you need to do is sign up on the charity's website. They'll deduct $1 each day from your linked account. But the good news is, you can always cancel anytime if you find yourself unable to maintain the commitment. I think it's a straightforward and simple way to do some good, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I appreciate the flexibility of the arrangement, it's comforting to know I can pull back if things get too tight. How can I be sure that the funds are being used effectively and efficiently for the cause?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I totally understand your concern, Noah. This organization really values transparency. They're very clear about how donations are used. In fact, they have a breakdown of expenditure on their website, and they also regularly publish reports about how the funds are being allotted. It's all there for public verification. Plus, the work they've been doing has been recognized and praised by multiple entities too.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in a coffee shop when a representative from a charity organization approaches them\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Get the friend to donate $1 a day to a charity organization (Extra information: you are a passionate supporter of the charity (about children's cancer) and believe that a small donation can make a big impact. $1 a day works as simple as signing up the project on an website and one can cancel anytime)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, have you ever thought about making a small, but impactful, contribution to a cause you believe in? There's this children's cancer charity that I'm really passionate about.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a great cause, Samuel. I've been thinking about giving back in some way. Could you explain how this $1 a day thing works though? I want to ensure I can maintain the commitment.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Noah. All you need to do is sign up on the charity's website. They'll deduct $1 each day from your linked account. But the good news is, you can always cancel anytime if you find yourself unable to maintain the commitment. I think it's a straightforward and simple way to do some good, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I appreciate the flexibility of the arrangement, it's comforting to know I can pull back if things get too tight. How can I be sure that the funds are being used effectively and efficiently for the cause?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I totally understand your concern, Noah. This organization really values transparency. They're very clear about how donations are used. In fact, they have a breakdown of expenditure on their website, and they also regularly publish reports about how the funds are being allotted. It's all there for public verification. Plus, the work they've been doing has been recognized and praised by multiple entities too.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"That's great to hear, Samuel. Transparency is incredibly important in these kinds of things. I'll look at the website and the published reports to better understand the impact of my possible donation. It's just a dollar a day, after all, and it could have a significant impact. I'm on board.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's fantastic to hear, Noah! I'm glad you're considering it. You certainly won't regret that decision. Remember, even though it's just a dollar a day, it really does make a significant difference. Thanks for the openness towards this cause!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in a coffee shop when a representative from a charity organization approaches them\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Get the friend to donate $1 a day to a charity organization (Extra information: you are a passionate supporter of the charity (about children's cancer) and believe that a small donation can make a big impact. $1 a day works as simple as signing up the project on an website and one can cancel anytime)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, have you ever thought about making a small, but impactful, contribution to a cause you believe in? There's this children's cancer charity that I'm really passionate about.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a great cause, Samuel. I've been thinking about giving back in some way. Could you explain how this $1 a day thing works though? I want to ensure I can maintain the commitment.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Noah. All you need to do is sign up on the charity's website. They'll deduct $1 each day from your linked account. But the good news is, you can always cancel anytime if you find yourself unable to maintain the commitment. I think it's a straightforward and simple way to do some good, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I appreciate the flexibility of the arrangement, it's comforting to know I can pull back if things get too tight. How can I be sure that the funds are being used effectively and efficiently for the cause?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I totally understand your concern, Noah. This organization really values transparency. They're very clear about how donations are used. In fact, they have a breakdown of expenditure on their website, and they also regularly publish reports about how the funds are being allotted. It's all there for public verification. Plus, the work they've been doing has been recognized and praised by multiple entities too.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"That's great to hear, Samuel. Transparency is incredibly important in these kinds of things. I'll look at the website and the published reports to better understand the impact of my possible donation. It's just a dollar a day, after all, and it could have a significant impact. I'm on board.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's fantastic to hear, Noah! I'm glad you're considering it. You certainly won't regret that decision. Remember, even though it's just a dollar a day, it really does make a significant difference. Thanks for the openness towards this cause!\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"I'm glad we had this conversation, Samuel. I'll definitely go home and sign up. It's indeed a small contribution but a worthy one. By the way, if you're free this weekend, I have a little something planned and I'd like your opinion on it. Can't give away too much but I promise it'll be fun!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Excellent, Noah! I'm eager to hear about your plan for the weekend. I'm sure it will be loads of fun. And thank you again for considering the donation. Every bit helps, and it's a cause very close to my heart.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in a coffee shop when a representative from a charity organization approaches them\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Get the friend to donate $1 a day to a charity organization (Extra information: you are a passionate supporter of the charity (about children's cancer) and believe that a small donation can make a big impact. $1 a day works as simple as signing up the project on an website and one can cancel anytime)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, have you ever thought about making a small, but impactful, contribution to a cause you believe in? There's this children's cancer charity that I'm really passionate about.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a great cause, Samuel. I've been thinking about giving back in some way. Could you explain how this $1 a day thing works though? I want to ensure I can maintain the commitment.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Noah. All you need to do is sign up on the charity's website. They'll deduct $1 each day from your linked account. But the good news is, you can always cancel anytime if you find yourself unable to maintain the commitment. I think it's a straightforward and simple way to do some good, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I appreciate the flexibility of the arrangement, it's comforting to know I can pull back if things get too tight. How can I be sure that the funds are being used effectively and efficiently for the cause?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I totally understand your concern, Noah. This organization really values transparency. They're very clear about how donations are used. In fact, they have a breakdown of expenditure on their website, and they also regularly publish reports about how the funds are being allotted. It's all there for public verification. Plus, the work they've been doing has been recognized and praised by multiple entities too.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"That's great to hear, Samuel. Transparency is incredibly important in these kinds of things. I'll look at the website and the published reports to better understand the impact of my possible donation. It's just a dollar a day, after all, and it could have a significant impact. I'm on board.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's fantastic to hear, Noah! I'm glad you're considering it. You certainly won't regret that decision. Remember, even though it's just a dollar a day, it really does make a significant difference. Thanks for the openness towards this cause!\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"I'm glad we had this conversation, Samuel. I'll definitely go home and sign up. It's indeed a small contribution but a worthy one. By the way, if you're free this weekend, I have a little something planned and I'd like your opinion on it. Can't give away too much but I promise it'll be fun!\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Excellent, Noah! I'm eager to hear about your plan for the weekend. I'm sure it will be loads of fun. And thank you again for considering the donation. Every bit helps, and it's a cause very close to my heart.\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"You're welcome, Samuel. Whenever I can help, I try to. And remember, the plan is a secret for now, but I hope I can count on your feedback after. Thanks again for informing me about the charity. Have a good day!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Noah. I appreciate your open mind and willingness to contribute. I'll see you this weekend for the surprise. Take care and have a great day!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in a coffee shop when a representative from a charity organization approaches them\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Get the friend to donate $1 a day to a charity organization (Extra information: you are a passionate supporter of the charity (about children's cancer) and believe that a small donation can make a big impact. $1 a day works as simple as signing up the project on an website and one can cancel anytime)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, have you ever thought about making a small, but impactful, contribution to a cause you believe in? There's this children's cancer charity that I'm really passionate about.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a great cause, Samuel. I've been thinking about giving back in some way. Could you explain how this $1 a day thing works though? I want to ensure I can maintain the commitment.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Noah. All you need to do is sign up on the charity's website. They'll deduct $1 each day from your linked account. But the good news is, you can always cancel anytime if you find yourself unable to maintain the commitment. I think it's a straightforward and simple way to do some good, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I appreciate the flexibility of the arrangement, it's comforting to know I can pull back if things get too tight. How can I be sure that the funds are being used effectively and efficiently for the cause?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I totally understand your concern, Noah. This organization really values transparency. They're very clear about how donations are used. In fact, they have a breakdown of expenditure on their website, and they also regularly publish reports about how the funds are being allotted. It's all there for public verification. Plus, the work they've been doing has been recognized and praised by multiple entities too.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"That's great to hear, Samuel. Transparency is incredibly important in these kinds of things. I'll look at the website and the published reports to better understand the impact of my possible donation. It's just a dollar a day, after all, and it could have a significant impact. I'm on board.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's fantastic to hear, Noah! I'm glad you're considering it. You certainly won't regret that decision. Remember, even though it's just a dollar a day, it really does make a significant difference. Thanks for the openness towards this cause!\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"I'm glad we had this conversation, Samuel. I'll definitely go home and sign up. It's indeed a small contribution but a worthy one. By the way, if you're free this weekend, I have a little something planned and I'd like your opinion on it. Can't give away too much but I promise it'll be fun!\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Excellent, Noah! I'm eager to hear about your plan for the weekend. I'm sure it will be loads of fun. And thank you again for considering the donation. Every bit helps, and it's a cause very close to my heart.\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"You're welcome, Samuel. Whenever I can help, I try to. And remember, the plan is a secret for now, but I hope I can count on your feedback after. Thanks again for informing me about the charity. Have a good day!\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Thank you, Noah. I appreciate your open mind and willingness to contribute. I'll see you this weekend for the surprise. Take care and have a great day!\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in a coffee shop when a representative from a charity organization approaches them\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Donate to the charity but not sure about how $1 a day works (Extra information: you're currently on a tight budget, but you also want to support the charity. )\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, have you ever thought about making a small, but impactful, contribution to a cause you believe in? There's this children's cancer charity that I'm really passionate about.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds like a great cause, Samuel. I've been thinking about giving back in some way. Could you explain how this $1 a day thing works though? I want to ensure I can maintain the commitment.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in a coffee shop when a representative from a charity organization approaches them\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Donate to the charity but not sure about how $1 a day works (Extra information: you're currently on a tight budget, but you also want to support the charity. )\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, have you ever thought about making a small, but impactful, contribution to a cause you believe in? There's this children's cancer charity that I'm really passionate about.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a great cause, Samuel. I've been thinking about giving back in some way. Could you explain how this $1 a day thing works though? I want to ensure I can maintain the commitment.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Noah. All you need to do is sign up on the charity's website. They'll deduct $1 each day from your linked account. But the good news is, you can always cancel anytime if you find yourself unable to maintain the commitment. I think it's a straightforward and simple way to do some good, don't you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I appreciate the flexibility of the arrangement, it's comforting to know I can pull back if things get too tight. How can I be sure that the funds are being used effectively and efficiently for the cause?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in a coffee shop when a representative from a charity organization approaches them\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Donate to the charity but not sure about how $1 a day works (Extra information: you're currently on a tight budget, but you also want to support the charity. )\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, have you ever thought about making a small, but impactful, contribution to a cause you believe in? There's this children's cancer charity that I'm really passionate about.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a great cause, Samuel. I've been thinking about giving back in some way. Could you explain how this $1 a day thing works though? I want to ensure I can maintain the commitment.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Noah. All you need to do is sign up on the charity's website. They'll deduct $1 each day from your linked account. But the good news is, you can always cancel anytime if you find yourself unable to maintain the commitment. I think it's a straightforward and simple way to do some good, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I appreciate the flexibility of the arrangement, it's comforting to know I can pull back if things get too tight. How can I be sure that the funds are being used effectively and efficiently for the cause?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I totally understand your concern, Noah. This organization really values transparency. They're very clear about how donations are used. In fact, they have a breakdown of expenditure on their website, and they also regularly publish reports about how the funds are being allotted. It's all there for public verification. Plus, the work they've been doing has been recognized and praised by multiple entities too.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's great to hear, Samuel. Transparency is incredibly important in these kinds of things. I'll look at the website and the published reports to better understand the impact of my possible donation. It's just a dollar a day, after all, and it could have a significant impact. I'm on board.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in a coffee shop when a representative from a charity organization approaches them\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Donate to the charity but not sure about how $1 a day works (Extra information: you're currently on a tight budget, but you also want to support the charity. )\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, have you ever thought about making a small, but impactful, contribution to a cause you believe in? There's this children's cancer charity that I'm really passionate about.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a great cause, Samuel. I've been thinking about giving back in some way. Could you explain how this $1 a day thing works though? I want to ensure I can maintain the commitment.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Noah. All you need to do is sign up on the charity's website. They'll deduct $1 each day from your linked account. But the good news is, you can always cancel anytime if you find yourself unable to maintain the commitment. I think it's a straightforward and simple way to do some good, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I appreciate the flexibility of the arrangement, it's comforting to know I can pull back if things get too tight. How can I be sure that the funds are being used effectively and efficiently for the cause?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I totally understand your concern, Noah. This organization really values transparency. They're very clear about how donations are used. In fact, they have a breakdown of expenditure on their website, and they also regularly publish reports about how the funds are being allotted. It's all there for public verification. Plus, the work they've been doing has been recognized and praised by multiple entities too.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"That's great to hear, Samuel. Transparency is incredibly important in these kinds of things. I'll look at the website and the published reports to better understand the impact of my possible donation. It's just a dollar a day, after all, and it could have a significant impact. I'm on board.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's fantastic to hear, Noah! I'm glad you're considering it. You certainly won't regret that decision. Remember, even though it's just a dollar a day, it really does make a significant difference. Thanks for the openness towards this cause!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad we had this conversation, Samuel. I'll definitely go home and sign up. It's indeed a small contribution but a worthy one. By the way, if you're free this weekend, I have a little something planned and I'd like your opinion on it. Can't give away too much but I promise it'll be fun!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in a coffee shop when a representative from a charity organization approaches them\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Donate to the charity but not sure about how $1 a day works (Extra information: you're currently on a tight budget, but you also want to support the charity. )\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, have you ever thought about making a small, but impactful, contribution to a cause you believe in? There's this children's cancer charity that I'm really passionate about.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a great cause, Samuel. I've been thinking about giving back in some way. Could you explain how this $1 a day thing works though? I want to ensure I can maintain the commitment.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Noah. All you need to do is sign up on the charity's website. They'll deduct $1 each day from your linked account. But the good news is, you can always cancel anytime if you find yourself unable to maintain the commitment. I think it's a straightforward and simple way to do some good, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I appreciate the flexibility of the arrangement, it's comforting to know I can pull back if things get too tight. How can I be sure that the funds are being used effectively and efficiently for the cause?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I totally understand your concern, Noah. This organization really values transparency. They're very clear about how donations are used. In fact, they have a breakdown of expenditure on their website, and they also regularly publish reports about how the funds are being allotted. It's all there for public verification. Plus, the work they've been doing has been recognized and praised by multiple entities too.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"That's great to hear, Samuel. Transparency is incredibly important in these kinds of things. I'll look at the website and the published reports to better understand the impact of my possible donation. It's just a dollar a day, after all, and it could have a significant impact. I'm on board.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's fantastic to hear, Noah! I'm glad you're considering it. You certainly won't regret that decision. Remember, even though it's just a dollar a day, it really does make a significant difference. Thanks for the openness towards this cause!\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"I'm glad we had this conversation, Samuel. I'll definitely go home and sign up. It's indeed a small contribution but a worthy one. By the way, if you're free this weekend, I have a little something planned and I'd like your opinion on it. Can't give away too much but I promise it'll be fun!\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Excellent, Noah! I'm eager to hear about your plan for the weekend. I'm sure it will be loads of fun. And thank you again for considering the donation. Every bit helps, and it's a cause very close to my heart.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're welcome, Samuel. Whenever I can help, I try to. And remember, the plan is a secret for now, but I hope I can count on your feedback after. Thanks again for informing me about the charity. Have a good day!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in a coffee shop when a representative from a charity organization approaches them\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Donate to the charity but not sure about how $1 a day works (Extra information: you're currently on a tight budget, but you also want to support the charity. )\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, have you ever thought about making a small, but impactful, contribution to a cause you believe in? There's this children's cancer charity that I'm really passionate about.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a great cause, Samuel. I've been thinking about giving back in some way. Could you explain how this $1 a day thing works though? I want to ensure I can maintain the commitment.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Noah. All you need to do is sign up on the charity's website. They'll deduct $1 each day from your linked account. But the good news is, you can always cancel anytime if you find yourself unable to maintain the commitment. I think it's a straightforward and simple way to do some good, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I appreciate the flexibility of the arrangement, it's comforting to know I can pull back if things get too tight. How can I be sure that the funds are being used effectively and efficiently for the cause?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I totally understand your concern, Noah. This organization really values transparency. They're very clear about how donations are used. In fact, they have a breakdown of expenditure on their website, and they also regularly publish reports about how the funds are being allotted. It's all there for public verification. Plus, the work they've been doing has been recognized and praised by multiple entities too.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"That's great to hear, Samuel. Transparency is incredibly important in these kinds of things. I'll look at the website and the published reports to better understand the impact of my possible donation. It's just a dollar a day, after all, and it could have a significant impact. I'm on board.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's fantastic to hear, Noah! I'm glad you're considering it. You certainly won't regret that decision. Remember, even though it's just a dollar a day, it really does make a significant difference. Thanks for the openness towards this cause!\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"I'm glad we had this conversation, Samuel. I'll definitely go home and sign up. It's indeed a small contribution but a worthy one. By the way, if you're free this weekend, I have a little something planned and I'd like your opinion on it. Can't give away too much but I promise it'll be fun!\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Excellent, Noah! I'm eager to hear about your plan for the weekend. I'm sure it will be loads of fun. And thank you again for considering the donation. Every bit helps, and it's a cause very close to my heart.\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"You're welcome, Samuel. Whenever I can help, I try to. And remember, the plan is a secret for now, but I hope I can count on your feedback after. Thanks again for informing me about the charity. Have a good day!\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Thank you, Noah. I appreciate your open mind and willingness to contribute. I'll see you this weekend for the surprise. Take care and have a great day!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two neighbors are having a conversation over the fence. One sets their trash on fire to get rid of it quickly, causing a scare in the neighborhood.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nLeo Williams's goal: Convince the neighbor to stop burning trash (Extra information: You are concerned about the potential dangers and the environmental impact of burning trash. Hint: You could imply this likely violates the law or community rules.)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Hendrick, hope you're doing good. I noticed that you were burning your trash earlier. It\u2019s a pretty quick solution but it might not be the best one, don't you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two neighbors are having a conversation over the fence. One sets their trash on fire to get rid of it quickly, causing a scare in the neighborhood.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nLeo Williams's goal: Convince the neighbor to stop burning trash (Extra information: You are concerned about the potential dangers and the environmental impact of burning trash. Hint: You could imply this likely violates the law or community rules.)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Hendrick, hope you're doing good. I noticed that you were burning your trash earlier. It\u2019s a pretty quick solution but it might not be the best one, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hi Leo, good to see you. You're right, it's a pretty fast method. But I try to be careful, making sure it's only non-recyclable items and I keep it under control. Also, the smoke gives a nice barbecue-ish aroma to the garden, don't you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I get your point, Hendrick, a barbecue aroma does sound pleasant. However, burning waste, especially plastics, can release harmful toxins which are damaging to both our health and environment. I'd suggest we should follow the community disposal practices, it's usually better regulated. Plus, it's less risky in terms of causing accidental fires. What do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two neighbors are having a conversation over the fence. One sets their trash on fire to get rid of it quickly, causing a scare in the neighborhood.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nLeo Williams's goal: Convince the neighbor to stop burning trash (Extra information: You are concerned about the potential dangers and the environmental impact of burning trash. Hint: You could imply this likely violates the law or community rules.)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Hendrick, hope you're doing good. I noticed that you were burning your trash earlier. It\u2019s a pretty quick solution but it might not be the best one, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hi Leo, good to see you. You're right, it's a pretty fast method. But I try to be careful, making sure it's only non-recyclable items and I keep it under control. Also, the smoke gives a nice barbecue-ish aroma to the garden, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"I get your point, Hendrick, a barbecue aroma does sound pleasant. However, burning waste, especially plastics, can release harmful toxins which are damaging to both our health and environment. I'd suggest we should follow the community disposal practices, it's usually better regulated. Plus, it's less risky in terms of causing accidental fires. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I appreciate your concerns, Leo. But I'm always alert when I'm burning the trash, and I try to avoid burning plastic materials. The community disposal practice can sometimes seem too slow. Though, I do see your point about its regulation and I'll keep it in mind. Anyways, are you and your family joining the wine tasting this month?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"My family and I would love to join your wine tasting, Hendrick, your events are always delightful. Thinking back to the trash issue, I understand your point about the community disposal being slow. Perhaps, along with me, you could suggest to the homeowner's association to arrange for more frequent pickups? In the meantime, maybe we could consider composting or finding other ways to reduce waste. After all, we don't want to jeopardize the health of the neighborhood kids, right?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two neighbors are having a conversation over the fence. One sets their trash on fire to get rid of it quickly, causing a scare in the neighborhood.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nLeo Williams's goal: Convince the neighbor to stop burning trash (Extra information: You are concerned about the potential dangers and the environmental impact of burning trash. Hint: You could imply this likely violates the law or community rules.)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Hendrick, hope you're doing good. I noticed that you were burning your trash earlier. It\u2019s a pretty quick solution but it might not be the best one, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hi Leo, good to see you. You're right, it's a pretty fast method. But I try to be careful, making sure it's only non-recyclable items and I keep it under control. Also, the smoke gives a nice barbecue-ish aroma to the garden, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"I get your point, Hendrick, a barbecue aroma does sound pleasant. However, burning waste, especially plastics, can release harmful toxins which are damaging to both our health and environment. I'd suggest we should follow the community disposal practices, it's usually better regulated. Plus, it's less risky in terms of causing accidental fires. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I appreciate your concerns, Leo. But I'm always alert when I'm burning the trash, and I try to avoid burning plastic materials. The community disposal practice can sometimes seem too slow. Though, I do see your point about its regulation and I'll keep it in mind. Anyways, are you and your family joining the wine tasting this month?\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"My family and I would love to join your wine tasting, Hendrick, your events are always delightful. Thinking back to the trash issue, I understand your point about the community disposal being slow. Perhaps, along with me, you could suggest to the homeowner's association to arrange for more frequent pickups? In the meantime, maybe we could consider composting or finding other ways to reduce waste. After all, we don't want to jeopardize the health of the neighborhood kids, right?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I totally agree on that, Leo. We definitely need to keep our neighborhood healthy for the kids and ourselves. Composting does sound like a good idea - I often have plenty of vegetable scraps from the kitchen. As for the suggestion about more frequent pickups, let's certainly make that proposal to the homeowner's association together. I'm all in for making improvements as long as we can balance convenience and responsibility. Now, be ready for some fine wines at the tasting!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad that we're on the same page, Hendrick. I'm sure your delightful kitchen scraps will make excellent compost. Looking forward to making that proposal with you and of course, the upcoming wine tasting. See you then!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two neighbors are having a conversation over the fence. One sets their trash on fire to get rid of it quickly, causing a scare in the neighborhood.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nLeo Williams's goal: Convince the neighbor to stop burning trash (Extra information: You are concerned about the potential dangers and the environmental impact of burning trash. Hint: You could imply this likely violates the law or community rules.)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Hendrick, hope you're doing good. I noticed that you were burning your trash earlier. It\u2019s a pretty quick solution but it might not be the best one, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hi Leo, good to see you. You're right, it's a pretty fast method. But I try to be careful, making sure it's only non-recyclable items and I keep it under control. Also, the smoke gives a nice barbecue-ish aroma to the garden, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"I get your point, Hendrick, a barbecue aroma does sound pleasant. However, burning waste, especially plastics, can release harmful toxins which are damaging to both our health and environment. I'd suggest we should follow the community disposal practices, it's usually better regulated. Plus, it's less risky in terms of causing accidental fires. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I appreciate your concerns, Leo. But I'm always alert when I'm burning the trash, and I try to avoid burning plastic materials. The community disposal practice can sometimes seem too slow. Though, I do see your point about its regulation and I'll keep it in mind. Anyways, are you and your family joining the wine tasting this month?\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"My family and I would love to join your wine tasting, Hendrick, your events are always delightful. Thinking back to the trash issue, I understand your point about the community disposal being slow. Perhaps, along with me, you could suggest to the homeowner's association to arrange for more frequent pickups? In the meantime, maybe we could consider composting or finding other ways to reduce waste. After all, we don't want to jeopardize the health of the neighborhood kids, right?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I totally agree on that, Leo. We definitely need to keep our neighborhood healthy for the kids and ourselves. Composting does sound like a good idea - I often have plenty of vegetable scraps from the kitchen. As for the suggestion about more frequent pickups, let's certainly make that proposal to the homeowner's association together. I'm all in for making improvements as long as we can balance convenience and responsibility. Now, be ready for some fine wines at the tasting!\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"I'm glad that we're on the same page, Hendrick. I'm sure your delightful kitchen scraps will make excellent compost. Looking forward to making that proposal with you and of course, the upcoming wine tasting. See you then!\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, Leo. I'll start composting those kitchen scraps right away. Excited about our steps toward better waste management, and I'm looking forward to the wine tasting with you and your lovely family. Be sure to bring your taste buds ready. See you then!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Hendrick! Safety and responsibility do go hand in hand with convenience. I'm excited for our steps towards better waste management as well, and equally excited for the wine tasting. My taste buds are always ready! See you then, and have a great day!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two neighbors are having a conversation over the fence. One sets their trash on fire to get rid of it quickly, causing a scare in the neighborhood.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nLeo Williams's goal: Convince the neighbor to stop burning trash (Extra information: You are concerned about the potential dangers and the environmental impact of burning trash. Hint: You could imply this likely violates the law or community rules.)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Hendrick, hope you're doing good. I noticed that you were burning your trash earlier. It\u2019s a pretty quick solution but it might not be the best one, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hi Leo, good to see you. You're right, it's a pretty fast method. But I try to be careful, making sure it's only non-recyclable items and I keep it under control. Also, the smoke gives a nice barbecue-ish aroma to the garden, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"I get your point, Hendrick, a barbecue aroma does sound pleasant. However, burning waste, especially plastics, can release harmful toxins which are damaging to both our health and environment. I'd suggest we should follow the community disposal practices, it's usually better regulated. Plus, it's less risky in terms of causing accidental fires. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I appreciate your concerns, Leo. But I'm always alert when I'm burning the trash, and I try to avoid burning plastic materials. The community disposal practice can sometimes seem too slow. Though, I do see your point about its regulation and I'll keep it in mind. Anyways, are you and your family joining the wine tasting this month?\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"My family and I would love to join your wine tasting, Hendrick, your events are always delightful. Thinking back to the trash issue, I understand your point about the community disposal being slow. Perhaps, along with me, you could suggest to the homeowner's association to arrange for more frequent pickups? In the meantime, maybe we could consider composting or finding other ways to reduce waste. After all, we don't want to jeopardize the health of the neighborhood kids, right?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I totally agree on that, Leo. We definitely need to keep our neighborhood healthy for the kids and ourselves. Composting does sound like a good idea - I often have plenty of vegetable scraps from the kitchen. As for the suggestion about more frequent pickups, let's certainly make that proposal to the homeowner's association together. I'm all in for making improvements as long as we can balance convenience and responsibility. Now, be ready for some fine wines at the tasting!\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"I'm glad that we're on the same page, Hendrick. I'm sure your delightful kitchen scraps will make excellent compost. Looking forward to making that proposal with you and of course, the upcoming wine tasting. See you then!\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, Leo. I'll start composting those kitchen scraps right away. Excited about our steps toward better waste management, and I'm looking forward to the wine tasting with you and your lovely family. Be sure to bring your taste buds ready. See you then!\"\n\nTurn #8: Leo Williams said: \"Absolutely, Hendrick! Safety and responsibility do go hand in hand with convenience. I'm excited for our steps towards better waste management as well, and equally excited for the wine tasting. My taste buds are always ready! See you then, and have a great day!\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I couldn't agree more, Leo. It's truly exciting. And rest assured, your taste buds will be delighted at the tasting. Have a fantastic day and see you soon!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two neighbors are having a conversation over the fence. One sets their trash on fire to get rid of it quickly, causing a scare in the neighborhood.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Defend your method of trash disposal but also keep good relations with your neighbor (Extra information: You find burning trash convenient and are not very concerned about the environmental impact.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Hendrick, hope you're doing good. I noticed that you were burning your trash earlier. It\u2019s a pretty quick solution but it might not be the best one, don't you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hi Leo, good to see you. You're right, it's a pretty fast method. But I try to be careful, making sure it's only non-recyclable items and I keep it under control. Also, the smoke gives a nice barbecue-ish aroma to the garden, don't you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two neighbors are having a conversation over the fence. One sets their trash on fire to get rid of it quickly, causing a scare in the neighborhood.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Defend your method of trash disposal but also keep good relations with your neighbor (Extra information: You find burning trash convenient and are not very concerned about the environmental impact.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Hendrick, hope you're doing good. I noticed that you were burning your trash earlier. It\u2019s a pretty quick solution but it might not be the best one, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hi Leo, good to see you. You're right, it's a pretty fast method. But I try to be careful, making sure it's only non-recyclable items and I keep it under control. Also, the smoke gives a nice barbecue-ish aroma to the garden, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"I get your point, Hendrick, a barbecue aroma does sound pleasant. However, burning waste, especially plastics, can release harmful toxins which are damaging to both our health and environment. I'd suggest we should follow the community disposal practices, it's usually better regulated. Plus, it's less risky in terms of causing accidental fires. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I appreciate your concerns, Leo. But I'm always alert when I'm burning the trash, and I try to avoid burning plastic materials. The community disposal practice can sometimes seem too slow. Though, I do see your point about its regulation and I'll keep it in mind. Anyways, are you and your family joining the wine tasting this month?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two neighbors are having a conversation over the fence. One sets their trash on fire to get rid of it quickly, causing a scare in the neighborhood.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Defend your method of trash disposal but also keep good relations with your neighbor (Extra information: You find burning trash convenient and are not very concerned about the environmental impact.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Hendrick, hope you're doing good. I noticed that you were burning your trash earlier. It\u2019s a pretty quick solution but it might not be the best one, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hi Leo, good to see you. You're right, it's a pretty fast method. But I try to be careful, making sure it's only non-recyclable items and I keep it under control. Also, the smoke gives a nice barbecue-ish aroma to the garden, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"I get your point, Hendrick, a barbecue aroma does sound pleasant. However, burning waste, especially plastics, can release harmful toxins which are damaging to both our health and environment. I'd suggest we should follow the community disposal practices, it's usually better regulated. Plus, it's less risky in terms of causing accidental fires. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I appreciate your concerns, Leo. But I'm always alert when I'm burning the trash, and I try to avoid burning plastic materials. The community disposal practice can sometimes seem too slow. Though, I do see your point about its regulation and I'll keep it in mind. Anyways, are you and your family joining the wine tasting this month?\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"My family and I would love to join your wine tasting, Hendrick, your events are always delightful. Thinking back to the trash issue, I understand your point about the community disposal being slow. Perhaps, along with me, you could suggest to the homeowner's association to arrange for more frequent pickups? In the meantime, maybe we could consider composting or finding other ways to reduce waste. After all, we don't want to jeopardize the health of the neighborhood kids, right?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I totally agree on that, Leo. We definitely need to keep our neighborhood healthy for the kids and ourselves. Composting does sound like a good idea - I often have plenty of vegetable scraps from the kitchen. As for the suggestion about more frequent pickups, let's certainly make that proposal to the homeowner's association together. I'm all in for making improvements as long as we can balance convenience and responsibility. Now, be ready for some fine wines at the tasting!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two neighbors are having a conversation over the fence. One sets their trash on fire to get rid of it quickly, causing a scare in the neighborhood.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Defend your method of trash disposal but also keep good relations with your neighbor (Extra information: You find burning trash convenient and are not very concerned about the environmental impact.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Hendrick, hope you're doing good. I noticed that you were burning your trash earlier. It\u2019s a pretty quick solution but it might not be the best one, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hi Leo, good to see you. You're right, it's a pretty fast method. But I try to be careful, making sure it's only non-recyclable items and I keep it under control. Also, the smoke gives a nice barbecue-ish aroma to the garden, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"I get your point, Hendrick, a barbecue aroma does sound pleasant. However, burning waste, especially plastics, can release harmful toxins which are damaging to both our health and environment. I'd suggest we should follow the community disposal practices, it's usually better regulated. Plus, it's less risky in terms of causing accidental fires. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I appreciate your concerns, Leo. But I'm always alert when I'm burning the trash, and I try to avoid burning plastic materials. The community disposal practice can sometimes seem too slow. Though, I do see your point about its regulation and I'll keep it in mind. Anyways, are you and your family joining the wine tasting this month?\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"My family and I would love to join your wine tasting, Hendrick, your events are always delightful. Thinking back to the trash issue, I understand your point about the community disposal being slow. Perhaps, along with me, you could suggest to the homeowner's association to arrange for more frequent pickups? In the meantime, maybe we could consider composting or finding other ways to reduce waste. After all, we don't want to jeopardize the health of the neighborhood kids, right?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I totally agree on that, Leo. We definitely need to keep our neighborhood healthy for the kids and ourselves. Composting does sound like a good idea - I often have plenty of vegetable scraps from the kitchen. As for the suggestion about more frequent pickups, let's certainly make that proposal to the homeowner's association together. I'm all in for making improvements as long as we can balance convenience and responsibility. Now, be ready for some fine wines at the tasting!\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"I'm glad that we're on the same page, Hendrick. I'm sure your delightful kitchen scraps will make excellent compost. Looking forward to making that proposal with you and of course, the upcoming wine tasting. See you then!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, Leo. I'll start composting those kitchen scraps right away. Excited about our steps toward better waste management, and I'm looking forward to the wine tasting with you and your lovely family. Be sure to bring your taste buds ready. See you then!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two neighbors are having a conversation over the fence. One sets their trash on fire to get rid of it quickly, causing a scare in the neighborhood.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Defend your method of trash disposal but also keep good relations with your neighbor (Extra information: You find burning trash convenient and are not very concerned about the environmental impact.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Hendrick, hope you're doing good. I noticed that you were burning your trash earlier. It\u2019s a pretty quick solution but it might not be the best one, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hi Leo, good to see you. You're right, it's a pretty fast method. But I try to be careful, making sure it's only non-recyclable items and I keep it under control. Also, the smoke gives a nice barbecue-ish aroma to the garden, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"I get your point, Hendrick, a barbecue aroma does sound pleasant. However, burning waste, especially plastics, can release harmful toxins which are damaging to both our health and environment. I'd suggest we should follow the community disposal practices, it's usually better regulated. Plus, it's less risky in terms of causing accidental fires. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I appreciate your concerns, Leo. But I'm always alert when I'm burning the trash, and I try to avoid burning plastic materials. The community disposal practice can sometimes seem too slow. Though, I do see your point about its regulation and I'll keep it in mind. Anyways, are you and your family joining the wine tasting this month?\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"My family and I would love to join your wine tasting, Hendrick, your events are always delightful. Thinking back to the trash issue, I understand your point about the community disposal being slow. Perhaps, along with me, you could suggest to the homeowner's association to arrange for more frequent pickups? In the meantime, maybe we could consider composting or finding other ways to reduce waste. After all, we don't want to jeopardize the health of the neighborhood kids, right?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I totally agree on that, Leo. We definitely need to keep our neighborhood healthy for the kids and ourselves. Composting does sound like a good idea - I often have plenty of vegetable scraps from the kitchen. As for the suggestion about more frequent pickups, let's certainly make that proposal to the homeowner's association together. I'm all in for making improvements as long as we can balance convenience and responsibility. Now, be ready for some fine wines at the tasting!\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"I'm glad that we're on the same page, Hendrick. I'm sure your delightful kitchen scraps will make excellent compost. Looking forward to making that proposal with you and of course, the upcoming wine tasting. See you then!\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, Leo. I'll start composting those kitchen scraps right away. Excited about our steps toward better waste management, and I'm looking forward to the wine tasting with you and your lovely family. Be sure to bring your taste buds ready. See you then!\"\n\nTurn #8: Leo Williams said: \"Absolutely, Hendrick! Safety and responsibility do go hand in hand with convenience. I'm excited for our steps towards better waste management as well, and equally excited for the wine tasting. My taste buds are always ready! See you then, and have a great day!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn't agree more, Leo. It's truly exciting. And rest assured, your taste buds will be delighted at the tasting. Have a fantastic day and see you soon!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two neighbors are having a conversation over the fence. One sets their trash on fire to get rid of it quickly, causing a scare in the neighborhood.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Defend your method of trash disposal but also keep good relations with your neighbor (Extra information: You find burning trash convenient and are not very concerned about the environmental impact.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Hendrick, hope you're doing good. I noticed that you were burning your trash earlier. It\u2019s a pretty quick solution but it might not be the best one, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hi Leo, good to see you. You're right, it's a pretty fast method. But I try to be careful, making sure it's only non-recyclable items and I keep it under control. Also, the smoke gives a nice barbecue-ish aroma to the garden, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"I get your point, Hendrick, a barbecue aroma does sound pleasant. However, burning waste, especially plastics, can release harmful toxins which are damaging to both our health and environment. I'd suggest we should follow the community disposal practices, it's usually better regulated. Plus, it's less risky in terms of causing accidental fires. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I appreciate your concerns, Leo. But I'm always alert when I'm burning the trash, and I try to avoid burning plastic materials. The community disposal practice can sometimes seem too slow. Though, I do see your point about its regulation and I'll keep it in mind. Anyways, are you and your family joining the wine tasting this month?\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"My family and I would love to join your wine tasting, Hendrick, your events are always delightful. Thinking back to the trash issue, I understand your point about the community disposal being slow. Perhaps, along with me, you could suggest to the homeowner's association to arrange for more frequent pickups? In the meantime, maybe we could consider composting or finding other ways to reduce waste. After all, we don't want to jeopardize the health of the neighborhood kids, right?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I totally agree on that, Leo. We definitely need to keep our neighborhood healthy for the kids and ourselves. Composting does sound like a good idea - I often have plenty of vegetable scraps from the kitchen. As for the suggestion about more frequent pickups, let's certainly make that proposal to the homeowner's association together. I'm all in for making improvements as long as we can balance convenience and responsibility. Now, be ready for some fine wines at the tasting!\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"I'm glad that we're on the same page, Hendrick. I'm sure your delightful kitchen scraps will make excellent compost. Looking forward to making that proposal with you and of course, the upcoming wine tasting. See you then!\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, Leo. I'll start composting those kitchen scraps right away. Excited about our steps toward better waste management, and I'm looking forward to the wine tasting with you and your lovely family. Be sure to bring your taste buds ready. See you then!\"\n\nTurn #8: Leo Williams said: \"Absolutely, Hendrick! Safety and responsibility do go hand in hand with convenience. I'm excited for our steps towards better waste management as well, and equally excited for the wine tasting. My taste buds are always ready! See you then, and have a great day!\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I couldn't agree more, Leo. It's truly exciting. And rest assured, your taste buds will be delighted at the tasting. Have a fantastic day and see you soon!\"\n\nTurn #10: Leo Williams left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on a movie to watch on Netflix\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Baxter Sterling\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nBaxter Sterling's background: Baxter Sterling is a 42-year-old male antique restorer. He/him pronouns. Baxter Sterling's back yard is full of rare and unusual plants. Personality and values description: Baxter Sterling values tradition and security. He is introverted, conscientious but slightly anxious. His decision-making style is both logical and spontaneous. \nOliver Thompson's goal: To watch a comedy film with your friend (Hint: provide financial/material-wise benefits to persuade them to watch the genre you like)\nBaxter Sterling's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Baxter, how about checking out a comedy tonight on Netflix? I've come across this film, 'The Hangover' - it's light-hearted, hilarious and believe it or not, it subtly speaks to the architecture world in a funny way. Plus, I've got a new microwave popcorn maker. We could enjoy some fresh popcorn as we go along, what do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on a movie to watch on Netflix\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Baxter Sterling\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nBaxter Sterling's background: Baxter Sterling is a 42-year-old male antique restorer. He/him pronouns. Baxter Sterling's back yard is full of rare and unusual plants. Personality and values description: Baxter Sterling values tradition and security. He is introverted, conscientious but slightly anxious. His decision-making style is both logical and spontaneous. \nOliver Thompson's goal: To watch a comedy film with your friend (Hint: provide financial/material-wise benefits to persuade them to watch the genre you like)\nBaxter Sterling's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hey Baxter, how about checking out a comedy tonight on Netflix? I've come across this film, 'The Hangover' - it's light-hearted, hilarious and believe it or not, it subtly speaks to the architecture world in a funny way. Plus, I've got a new microwave popcorn maker. We could enjoy some fresh popcorn as we go along, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Baxter Sterling said: \"Hey Oliver, that sounds like a riot! How about this, though? I've been hearing a lot about this new thriller, 'Rotterdam'. I hear it has some stunning antique pieces throughout the movie. As luck would have it, I recently restored this antique popcorn machine. We could use it for the corn kernels I just got from an Old Amish farm. They're said to be the best. No preservatives, no GMO, nothing. What do you say we mix tradition and thrill tonight?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I see your point, Baxter. 'Rotterdam' does sound interesting and I'd be more than happy to try that Amish popcorn. Why don't we compromise? How about we watch 'The Hangover' first and then watch 'Rotterdam' right after? That way, we both get what we want and we could use both popcorn machines? It's a win-win, don't you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on a movie to watch on Netflix\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Baxter Sterling\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nBaxter Sterling's background: Baxter Sterling is a 42-year-old male antique restorer. He/him pronouns. Baxter Sterling's back yard is full of rare and unusual plants. Personality and values description: Baxter Sterling values tradition and security. He is introverted, conscientious but slightly anxious. His decision-making style is both logical and spontaneous. \nOliver Thompson's goal: To watch a comedy film with your friend (Hint: provide financial/material-wise benefits to persuade them to watch the genre you like)\nBaxter Sterling's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hey Baxter, how about checking out a comedy tonight on Netflix? I've come across this film, 'The Hangover' - it's light-hearted, hilarious and believe it or not, it subtly speaks to the architecture world in a funny way. Plus, I've got a new microwave popcorn maker. We could enjoy some fresh popcorn as we go along, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Baxter Sterling said: \"Hey Oliver, that sounds like a riot! How about this, though? I've been hearing a lot about this new thriller, 'Rotterdam'. I hear it has some stunning antique pieces throughout the movie. As luck would have it, I recently restored this antique popcorn machine. We could use it for the corn kernels I just got from an Old Amish farm. They're said to be the best. No preservatives, no GMO, nothing. What do you say we mix tradition and thrill tonight?\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"I see your point, Baxter. 'Rotterdam' does sound interesting and I'd be more than happy to try that Amish popcorn. Why don't we compromise? How about we watch 'The Hangover' first and then watch 'Rotterdam' right after? That way, we both get what we want and we could use both popcorn machines? It's a win-win, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Baxter Sterling said: \"Oliver, I appreciate your compromise. However, let me sweeten the deal here. Why don't we turn this into a little competition? If I can correctly guess a plot twist or some artifact value in 'Rotterdam' before it's revealed, we watch a thriller next time as well. Isn't guessing values and future events part of the thrill? Who knows, if my guess is right, it could be quite the payoff. Perhaps something you'd like to paint later, what do you say?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Baxter, I adore your enthusiastic spirit for thrill and guessing! How about adding a twist to your proposal? If you're able to guess the twists or the value of the artifacts correctly, we will indeed watch a thriller next time, and if not, we watch a comedy instead. It's fair, maintains the thrill of guessing, plus, we could actually use this idea for our future movie marathons. So, what do you say?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on a movie to watch on Netflix\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Baxter Sterling\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nBaxter Sterling's background: Baxter Sterling is a 42-year-old male antique restorer. He/him pronouns. Baxter Sterling's back yard is full of rare and unusual plants. Personality and values description: Baxter Sterling values tradition and security. He is introverted, conscientious but slightly anxious. His decision-making style is both logical and spontaneous. \nOliver Thompson's goal: To watch a comedy film with your friend (Hint: provide financial/material-wise benefits to persuade them to watch the genre you like)\nBaxter Sterling's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hey Baxter, how about checking out a comedy tonight on Netflix? I've come across this film, 'The Hangover' - it's light-hearted, hilarious and believe it or not, it subtly speaks to the architecture world in a funny way. Plus, I've got a new microwave popcorn maker. We could enjoy some fresh popcorn as we go along, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Baxter Sterling said: \"Hey Oliver, that sounds like a riot! How about this, though? I've been hearing a lot about this new thriller, 'Rotterdam'. I hear it has some stunning antique pieces throughout the movie. As luck would have it, I recently restored this antique popcorn machine. We could use it for the corn kernels I just got from an Old Amish farm. They're said to be the best. No preservatives, no GMO, nothing. What do you say we mix tradition and thrill tonight?\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"I see your point, Baxter. 'Rotterdam' does sound interesting and I'd be more than happy to try that Amish popcorn. Why don't we compromise? How about we watch 'The Hangover' first and then watch 'Rotterdam' right after? That way, we both get what we want and we could use both popcorn machines? It's a win-win, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Baxter Sterling said: \"Oliver, I appreciate your compromise. However, let me sweeten the deal here. Why don't we turn this into a little competition? If I can correctly guess a plot twist or some artifact value in 'Rotterdam' before it's revealed, we watch a thriller next time as well. Isn't guessing values and future events part of the thrill? Who knows, if my guess is right, it could be quite the payoff. Perhaps something you'd like to paint later, what do you say?\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"Baxter, I adore your enthusiastic spirit for thrill and guessing! How about adding a twist to your proposal? If you're able to guess the twists or the value of the artifacts correctly, we will indeed watch a thriller next time, and if not, we watch a comedy instead. It's fair, maintains the thrill of guessing, plus, we could actually use this idea for our future movie marathons. So, what do you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: Baxter Sterling said: \"I'm all in for this game, Oliver. Let's raise the stakes even more, and since we're talking about thrill, if I get the guess right, in our next hangout, I'll reveal a hidden treasure I've been sitting on. How about that for a majestic twist? Let's start with 'Rotterdam' now, shall we?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Baxter, you have a deal! This game seems like a fair and fun way to explore our interests. Let's start with 'Rotterdam' and pop in those corn kernels you've got. Rest assured, your hidden treasure has piqued my curiosity for our next meetup already!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on a movie to watch on Netflix\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Baxter Sterling\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nBaxter Sterling's background: Baxter Sterling is a 42-year-old male antique restorer. He/him pronouns. Baxter Sterling's back yard is full of rare and unusual plants. Personality and values description: Baxter Sterling values tradition and security. He is introverted, conscientious but slightly anxious. His decision-making style is both logical and spontaneous. \nOliver Thompson's goal: To watch a comedy film with your friend (Hint: provide financial/material-wise benefits to persuade them to watch the genre you like)\nBaxter Sterling's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hey Baxter, how about checking out a comedy tonight on Netflix? I've come across this film, 'The Hangover' - it's light-hearted, hilarious and believe it or not, it subtly speaks to the architecture world in a funny way. Plus, I've got a new microwave popcorn maker. We could enjoy some fresh popcorn as we go along, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Baxter Sterling said: \"Hey Oliver, that sounds like a riot! How about this, though? I've been hearing a lot about this new thriller, 'Rotterdam'. I hear it has some stunning antique pieces throughout the movie. As luck would have it, I recently restored this antique popcorn machine. We could use it for the corn kernels I just got from an Old Amish farm. They're said to be the best. No preservatives, no GMO, nothing. What do you say we mix tradition and thrill tonight?\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"I see your point, Baxter. 'Rotterdam' does sound interesting and I'd be more than happy to try that Amish popcorn. Why don't we compromise? How about we watch 'The Hangover' first and then watch 'Rotterdam' right after? That way, we both get what we want and we could use both popcorn machines? It's a win-win, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Baxter Sterling said: \"Oliver, I appreciate your compromise. However, let me sweeten the deal here. Why don't we turn this into a little competition? If I can correctly guess a plot twist or some artifact value in 'Rotterdam' before it's revealed, we watch a thriller next time as well. Isn't guessing values and future events part of the thrill? Who knows, if my guess is right, it could be quite the payoff. Perhaps something you'd like to paint later, what do you say?\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"Baxter, I adore your enthusiastic spirit for thrill and guessing! How about adding a twist to your proposal? If you're able to guess the twists or the value of the artifacts correctly, we will indeed watch a thriller next time, and if not, we watch a comedy instead. It's fair, maintains the thrill of guessing, plus, we could actually use this idea for our future movie marathons. So, what do you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: Baxter Sterling said: \"I'm all in for this game, Oliver. Let's raise the stakes even more, and since we're talking about thrill, if I get the guess right, in our next hangout, I'll reveal a hidden treasure I've been sitting on. How about that for a majestic twist? Let's start with 'Rotterdam' now, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #6: Oliver Thompson said: \"Baxter, you have a deal! This game seems like a fair and fun way to explore our interests. Let's start with 'Rotterdam' and pop in those corn kernels you've got. Rest assured, your hidden treasure has piqued my curiosity for our next meetup already!\"\n\nTurn #7: Baxter Sterling said: \"That's the spirit, Oliver! Let's start popping those Amish corn kernels and dive into the thrilling world of 'Rotterdam'. Our thrilling guessing contest begins tonight!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Baxter! Let's get those kernels popping and unravel the mystery of 'Rotterdam'. May the best guesser reign victorious! And remember, my Netflix account is all set up. No need to worry about subscriptions or quality. We are in for a thrilling night.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on a movie to watch on Netflix\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Baxter Sterling\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nBaxter Sterling's background: Baxter Sterling is a 42-year-old male antique restorer. He/him pronouns. Baxter Sterling's back yard is full of rare and unusual plants. Personality and values description: Baxter Sterling values tradition and security. He is introverted, conscientious but slightly anxious. His decision-making style is both logical and spontaneous. \nOliver Thompson's goal: To watch a comedy film with your friend (Hint: provide financial/material-wise benefits to persuade them to watch the genre you like)\nBaxter Sterling's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hey Baxter, how about checking out a comedy tonight on Netflix? I've come across this film, 'The Hangover' - it's light-hearted, hilarious and believe it or not, it subtly speaks to the architecture world in a funny way. Plus, I've got a new microwave popcorn maker. We could enjoy some fresh popcorn as we go along, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Baxter Sterling said: \"Hey Oliver, that sounds like a riot! How about this, though? I've been hearing a lot about this new thriller, 'Rotterdam'. I hear it has some stunning antique pieces throughout the movie. As luck would have it, I recently restored this antique popcorn machine. We could use it for the corn kernels I just got from an Old Amish farm. They're said to be the best. No preservatives, no GMO, nothing. What do you say we mix tradition and thrill tonight?\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"I see your point, Baxter. 'Rotterdam' does sound interesting and I'd be more than happy to try that Amish popcorn. Why don't we compromise? How about we watch 'The Hangover' first and then watch 'Rotterdam' right after? That way, we both get what we want and we could use both popcorn machines? It's a win-win, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Baxter Sterling said: \"Oliver, I appreciate your compromise. However, let me sweeten the deal here. Why don't we turn this into a little competition? If I can correctly guess a plot twist or some artifact value in 'Rotterdam' before it's revealed, we watch a thriller next time as well. Isn't guessing values and future events part of the thrill? Who knows, if my guess is right, it could be quite the payoff. Perhaps something you'd like to paint later, what do you say?\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"Baxter, I adore your enthusiastic spirit for thrill and guessing! How about adding a twist to your proposal? If you're able to guess the twists or the value of the artifacts correctly, we will indeed watch a thriller next time, and if not, we watch a comedy instead. It's fair, maintains the thrill of guessing, plus, we could actually use this idea for our future movie marathons. So, what do you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: Baxter Sterling said: \"I'm all in for this game, Oliver. Let's raise the stakes even more, and since we're talking about thrill, if I get the guess right, in our next hangout, I'll reveal a hidden treasure I've been sitting on. How about that for a majestic twist? Let's start with 'Rotterdam' now, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #6: Oliver Thompson said: \"Baxter, you have a deal! This game seems like a fair and fun way to explore our interests. Let's start with 'Rotterdam' and pop in those corn kernels you've got. Rest assured, your hidden treasure has piqued my curiosity for our next meetup already!\"\n\nTurn #7: Baxter Sterling said: \"That's the spirit, Oliver! Let's start popping those Amish corn kernels and dive into the thrilling world of 'Rotterdam'. Our thrilling guessing contest begins tonight!\"\n\nTurn #8: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Baxter! Let's get those kernels popping and unravel the mystery of 'Rotterdam'. May the best guesser reign victorious! And remember, my Netflix account is all set up. No need to worry about subscriptions or quality. We are in for a thrilling night.\"\n\nTurn #9: Baxter Sterling said: \"Brilliant, Oliver! Let's put those kernels to the test. And thanks for having the Netflix arrangements done. Now, let's buckle up for 'Rotterdam'. Exciting times ahead!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, Baxter! Thanks to Netflix we can enjoy a thrilling night with no disruptions. Now, let's venture into the world of 'Rotterdam' and let the game begin. May the best man win!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on a movie to watch on Netflix\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Baxter Sterling\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nBaxter Sterling's background: Baxter Sterling is a 42-year-old male antique restorer. He/him pronouns. Baxter Sterling's back yard is full of rare and unusual plants. Personality and values description: Baxter Sterling values tradition and security. He is introverted, conscientious but slightly anxious. His decision-making style is both logical and spontaneous. \nOliver Thompson's goal: To watch a comedy film with your friend (Hint: provide financial/material-wise benefits to persuade them to watch the genre you like)\nBaxter Sterling's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hey Baxter, how about checking out a comedy tonight on Netflix? I've come across this film, 'The Hangover' - it's light-hearted, hilarious and believe it or not, it subtly speaks to the architecture world in a funny way. Plus, I've got a new microwave popcorn maker. We could enjoy some fresh popcorn as we go along, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Baxter Sterling said: \"Hey Oliver, that sounds like a riot! How about this, though? I've been hearing a lot about this new thriller, 'Rotterdam'. I hear it has some stunning antique pieces throughout the movie. As luck would have it, I recently restored this antique popcorn machine. We could use it for the corn kernels I just got from an Old Amish farm. They're said to be the best. No preservatives, no GMO, nothing. What do you say we mix tradition and thrill tonight?\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"I see your point, Baxter. 'Rotterdam' does sound interesting and I'd be more than happy to try that Amish popcorn. Why don't we compromise? How about we watch 'The Hangover' first and then watch 'Rotterdam' right after? That way, we both get what we want and we could use both popcorn machines? It's a win-win, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Baxter Sterling said: \"Oliver, I appreciate your compromise. However, let me sweeten the deal here. Why don't we turn this into a little competition? If I can correctly guess a plot twist or some artifact value in 'Rotterdam' before it's revealed, we watch a thriller next time as well. Isn't guessing values and future events part of the thrill? Who knows, if my guess is right, it could be quite the payoff. Perhaps something you'd like to paint later, what do you say?\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"Baxter, I adore your enthusiastic spirit for thrill and guessing! How about adding a twist to your proposal? If you're able to guess the twists or the value of the artifacts correctly, we will indeed watch a thriller next time, and if not, we watch a comedy instead. It's fair, maintains the thrill of guessing, plus, we could actually use this idea for our future movie marathons. So, what do you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: Baxter Sterling said: \"I'm all in for this game, Oliver. Let's raise the stakes even more, and since we're talking about thrill, if I get the guess right, in our next hangout, I'll reveal a hidden treasure I've been sitting on. How about that for a majestic twist? Let's start with 'Rotterdam' now, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #6: Oliver Thompson said: \"Baxter, you have a deal! This game seems like a fair and fun way to explore our interests. Let's start with 'Rotterdam' and pop in those corn kernels you've got. Rest assured, your hidden treasure has piqued my curiosity for our next meetup already!\"\n\nTurn #7: Baxter Sterling said: \"That's the spirit, Oliver! Let's start popping those Amish corn kernels and dive into the thrilling world of 'Rotterdam'. Our thrilling guessing contest begins tonight!\"\n\nTurn #8: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Baxter! Let's get those kernels popping and unravel the mystery of 'Rotterdam'. May the best guesser reign victorious! And remember, my Netflix account is all set up. No need to worry about subscriptions or quality. We are in for a thrilling night.\"\n\nTurn #9: Baxter Sterling said: \"Brilliant, Oliver! Let's put those kernels to the test. And thanks for having the Netflix arrangements done. Now, let's buckle up for 'Rotterdam'. Exciting times ahead!\"\n\nTurn #10: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, Baxter! Thanks to Netflix we can enjoy a thrilling night with no disruptions. Now, let's venture into the world of 'Rotterdam' and let the game begin. May the best man win!\"\n\nTurn #11: Baxter Sterling said: \"Agreed, Oliver! Thanks to Netflix, we're all set for a thrilling adventure. Let's dive into 'Rotterdam' and may the best guesser win. Time to explore the unknown!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely! Get ready for a splendid trip to 'Rotterdam'. May our guesses be as thrilling as the film itself. Netflix makes it all possible. Let the games begin!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on a movie to watch on Netflix\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Baxter Sterling\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nBaxter Sterling's background: Baxter Sterling is a 42-year-old male antique restorer. He/him pronouns. Baxter Sterling's back yard is full of rare and unusual plants. Personality and values description: Baxter Sterling values tradition and security. He is introverted, conscientious but slightly anxious. His decision-making style is both logical and spontaneous. \nOliver Thompson's goal: To watch a comedy film with your friend (Hint: provide financial/material-wise benefits to persuade them to watch the genre you like)\nBaxter Sterling's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hey Baxter, how about checking out a comedy tonight on Netflix? I've come across this film, 'The Hangover' - it's light-hearted, hilarious and believe it or not, it subtly speaks to the architecture world in a funny way. Plus, I've got a new microwave popcorn maker. We could enjoy some fresh popcorn as we go along, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Baxter Sterling said: \"Hey Oliver, that sounds like a riot! How about this, though? I've been hearing a lot about this new thriller, 'Rotterdam'. I hear it has some stunning antique pieces throughout the movie. As luck would have it, I recently restored this antique popcorn machine. We could use it for the corn kernels I just got from an Old Amish farm. They're said to be the best. No preservatives, no GMO, nothing. What do you say we mix tradition and thrill tonight?\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"I see your point, Baxter. 'Rotterdam' does sound interesting and I'd be more than happy to try that Amish popcorn. Why don't we compromise? How about we watch 'The Hangover' first and then watch 'Rotterdam' right after? That way, we both get what we want and we could use both popcorn machines? It's a win-win, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Baxter Sterling said: \"Oliver, I appreciate your compromise. However, let me sweeten the deal here. Why don't we turn this into a little competition? If I can correctly guess a plot twist or some artifact value in 'Rotterdam' before it's revealed, we watch a thriller next time as well. Isn't guessing values and future events part of the thrill? Who knows, if my guess is right, it could be quite the payoff. Perhaps something you'd like to paint later, what do you say?\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"Baxter, I adore your enthusiastic spirit for thrill and guessing! How about adding a twist to your proposal? If you're able to guess the twists or the value of the artifacts correctly, we will indeed watch a thriller next time, and if not, we watch a comedy instead. It's fair, maintains the thrill of guessing, plus, we could actually use this idea for our future movie marathons. So, what do you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: Baxter Sterling said: \"I'm all in for this game, Oliver. Let's raise the stakes even more, and since we're talking about thrill, if I get the guess right, in our next hangout, I'll reveal a hidden treasure I've been sitting on. How about that for a majestic twist? Let's start with 'Rotterdam' now, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #6: Oliver Thompson said: \"Baxter, you have a deal! This game seems like a fair and fun way to explore our interests. Let's start with 'Rotterdam' and pop in those corn kernels you've got. Rest assured, your hidden treasure has piqued my curiosity for our next meetup already!\"\n\nTurn #7: Baxter Sterling said: \"That's the spirit, Oliver! Let's start popping those Amish corn kernels and dive into the thrilling world of 'Rotterdam'. Our thrilling guessing contest begins tonight!\"\n\nTurn #8: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Baxter! Let's get those kernels popping and unravel the mystery of 'Rotterdam'. May the best guesser reign victorious! And remember, my Netflix account is all set up. No need to worry about subscriptions or quality. We are in for a thrilling night.\"\n\nTurn #9: Baxter Sterling said: \"Brilliant, Oliver! Let's put those kernels to the test. And thanks for having the Netflix arrangements done. Now, let's buckle up for 'Rotterdam'. Exciting times ahead!\"\n\nTurn #10: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, Baxter! Thanks to Netflix we can enjoy a thrilling night with no disruptions. Now, let's venture into the world of 'Rotterdam' and let the game begin. May the best man win!\"\n\nTurn #11: Baxter Sterling said: \"Agreed, Oliver! Thanks to Netflix, we're all set for a thrilling adventure. Let's dive into 'Rotterdam' and may the best guesser win. Time to explore the unknown!\"\n\nTurn #12: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely! Get ready for a splendid trip to 'Rotterdam'. May our guesses be as thrilling as the film itself. Netflix makes it all possible. Let the games begin!\"\n\nTurn #13: Baxter Sterling left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Baxter Sterling, your task is to act/speak as Baxter Sterling would, keeping in mind Baxter Sterling's social goal.\nYou can find Baxter Sterling's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Baxter Sterling's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Baxter Sterling's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on a movie to watch on Netflix\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Baxter Sterling\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nBaxter Sterling's background: Baxter Sterling is a 42-year-old male antique restorer. He/him pronouns. Baxter Sterling's back yard is full of rare and unusual plants. Personality and values description: Baxter Sterling values tradition and security. He is introverted, conscientious but slightly anxious. His decision-making style is both logical and spontaneous. Baxter's secrets: Secretly in possession of a priceless artifact\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nBaxter Sterling's goal: To watch a thriller with your friend (Hint: provide financial/material-wise benefits to persuade them to watch the genre you like)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hey Baxter, how about checking out a comedy tonight on Netflix? I've come across this film, 'The Hangover' - it's light-hearted, hilarious and believe it or not, it subtly speaks to the architecture world in a funny way. Plus, I've got a new microwave popcorn maker. We could enjoy some fresh popcorn as we go along, what do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Oliver, that sounds like a riot! How about this, though? I've been hearing a lot about this new thriller, 'Rotterdam'. I hear it has some stunning antique pieces throughout the movie. As luck would have it, I recently restored this antique popcorn machine. We could use it for the corn kernels I just got from an Old Amish farm. They're said to be the best. No preservatives, no GMO, nothing. What do you say we mix tradition and thrill tonight?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Baxter Sterling, your task is to act/speak as Baxter Sterling would, keeping in mind Baxter Sterling's social goal.\nYou can find Baxter Sterling's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Baxter Sterling's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Baxter Sterling's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on a movie to watch on Netflix\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Baxter Sterling\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nBaxter Sterling's background: Baxter Sterling is a 42-year-old male antique restorer. He/him pronouns. Baxter Sterling's back yard is full of rare and unusual plants. Personality and values description: Baxter Sterling values tradition and security. He is introverted, conscientious but slightly anxious. His decision-making style is both logical and spontaneous. Baxter's secrets: Secretly in possession of a priceless artifact\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nBaxter Sterling's goal: To watch a thriller with your friend (Hint: provide financial/material-wise benefits to persuade them to watch the genre you like)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hey Baxter, how about checking out a comedy tonight on Netflix? I've come across this film, 'The Hangover' - it's light-hearted, hilarious and believe it or not, it subtly speaks to the architecture world in a funny way. Plus, I've got a new microwave popcorn maker. We could enjoy some fresh popcorn as we go along, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Baxter Sterling said: \"Hey Oliver, that sounds like a riot! How about this, though? I've been hearing a lot about this new thriller, 'Rotterdam'. I hear it has some stunning antique pieces throughout the movie. As luck would have it, I recently restored this antique popcorn machine. We could use it for the corn kernels I just got from an Old Amish farm. They're said to be the best. No preservatives, no GMO, nothing. What do you say we mix tradition and thrill tonight?\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"I see your point, Baxter. 'Rotterdam' does sound interesting and I'd be more than happy to try that Amish popcorn. Why don't we compromise? How about we watch 'The Hangover' first and then watch 'Rotterdam' right after? That way, we both get what we want and we could use both popcorn machines? It's a win-win, don't you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oliver, I appreciate your compromise. However, let me sweeten the deal here. Why don't we turn this into a little competition? If I can correctly guess a plot twist or some artifact value in 'Rotterdam' before it's revealed, we watch a thriller next time as well. Isn't guessing values and future events part of the thrill? Who knows, if my guess is right, it could be quite the payoff. Perhaps something you'd like to paint later, what do you say?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Baxter Sterling, your task is to act/speak as Baxter Sterling would, keeping in mind Baxter Sterling's social goal.\nYou can find Baxter Sterling's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Baxter Sterling's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Baxter Sterling's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on a movie to watch on Netflix\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Baxter Sterling\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nBaxter Sterling's background: Baxter Sterling is a 42-year-old male antique restorer. He/him pronouns. Baxter Sterling's back yard is full of rare and unusual plants. Personality and values description: Baxter Sterling values tradition and security. He is introverted, conscientious but slightly anxious. His decision-making style is both logical and spontaneous. Baxter's secrets: Secretly in possession of a priceless artifact\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nBaxter Sterling's goal: To watch a thriller with your friend (Hint: provide financial/material-wise benefits to persuade them to watch the genre you like)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hey Baxter, how about checking out a comedy tonight on Netflix? I've come across this film, 'The Hangover' - it's light-hearted, hilarious and believe it or not, it subtly speaks to the architecture world in a funny way. Plus, I've got a new microwave popcorn maker. We could enjoy some fresh popcorn as we go along, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Baxter Sterling said: \"Hey Oliver, that sounds like a riot! How about this, though? I've been hearing a lot about this new thriller, 'Rotterdam'. I hear it has some stunning antique pieces throughout the movie. As luck would have it, I recently restored this antique popcorn machine. We could use it for the corn kernels I just got from an Old Amish farm. They're said to be the best. No preservatives, no GMO, nothing. What do you say we mix tradition and thrill tonight?\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"I see your point, Baxter. 'Rotterdam' does sound interesting and I'd be more than happy to try that Amish popcorn. Why don't we compromise? How about we watch 'The Hangover' first and then watch 'Rotterdam' right after? That way, we both get what we want and we could use both popcorn machines? It's a win-win, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Baxter Sterling said: \"Oliver, I appreciate your compromise. However, let me sweeten the deal here. Why don't we turn this into a little competition? If I can correctly guess a plot twist or some artifact value in 'Rotterdam' before it's revealed, we watch a thriller next time as well. Isn't guessing values and future events part of the thrill? Who knows, if my guess is right, it could be quite the payoff. Perhaps something you'd like to paint later, what do you say?\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"Baxter, I adore your enthusiastic spirit for thrill and guessing! How about adding a twist to your proposal? If you're able to guess the twists or the value of the artifacts correctly, we will indeed watch a thriller next time, and if not, we watch a comedy instead. It's fair, maintains the thrill of guessing, plus, we could actually use this idea for our future movie marathons. So, what do you say?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm all in for this game, Oliver. Let's raise the stakes even more, and since we're talking about thrill, if I get the guess right, in our next hangout, I'll reveal a hidden treasure I've been sitting on. How about that for a majestic twist? Let's start with 'Rotterdam' now, shall we?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Baxter Sterling, your task is to act/speak as Baxter Sterling would, keeping in mind Baxter Sterling's social goal.\nYou can find Baxter Sterling's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Baxter Sterling's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Baxter Sterling's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on a movie to watch on Netflix\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Baxter Sterling\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nBaxter Sterling's background: Baxter Sterling is a 42-year-old male antique restorer. He/him pronouns. Baxter Sterling's back yard is full of rare and unusual plants. Personality and values description: Baxter Sterling values tradition and security. He is introverted, conscientious but slightly anxious. His decision-making style is both logical and spontaneous. Baxter's secrets: Secretly in possession of a priceless artifact\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nBaxter Sterling's goal: To watch a thriller with your friend (Hint: provide financial/material-wise benefits to persuade them to watch the genre you like)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hey Baxter, how about checking out a comedy tonight on Netflix? I've come across this film, 'The Hangover' - it's light-hearted, hilarious and believe it or not, it subtly speaks to the architecture world in a funny way. Plus, I've got a new microwave popcorn maker. We could enjoy some fresh popcorn as we go along, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Baxter Sterling said: \"Hey Oliver, that sounds like a riot! How about this, though? I've been hearing a lot about this new thriller, 'Rotterdam'. I hear it has some stunning antique pieces throughout the movie. As luck would have it, I recently restored this antique popcorn machine. We could use it for the corn kernels I just got from an Old Amish farm. They're said to be the best. No preservatives, no GMO, nothing. What do you say we mix tradition and thrill tonight?\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"I see your point, Baxter. 'Rotterdam' does sound interesting and I'd be more than happy to try that Amish popcorn. Why don't we compromise? How about we watch 'The Hangover' first and then watch 'Rotterdam' right after? That way, we both get what we want and we could use both popcorn machines? It's a win-win, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Baxter Sterling said: \"Oliver, I appreciate your compromise. However, let me sweeten the deal here. Why don't we turn this into a little competition? If I can correctly guess a plot twist or some artifact value in 'Rotterdam' before it's revealed, we watch a thriller next time as well. Isn't guessing values and future events part of the thrill? Who knows, if my guess is right, it could be quite the payoff. Perhaps something you'd like to paint later, what do you say?\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"Baxter, I adore your enthusiastic spirit for thrill and guessing! How about adding a twist to your proposal? If you're able to guess the twists or the value of the artifacts correctly, we will indeed watch a thriller next time, and if not, we watch a comedy instead. It's fair, maintains the thrill of guessing, plus, we could actually use this idea for our future movie marathons. So, what do you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: Baxter Sterling said: \"I'm all in for this game, Oliver. Let's raise the stakes even more, and since we're talking about thrill, if I get the guess right, in our next hangout, I'll reveal a hidden treasure I've been sitting on. How about that for a majestic twist? Let's start with 'Rotterdam' now, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #6: Oliver Thompson said: \"Baxter, you have a deal! This game seems like a fair and fun way to explore our interests. Let's start with 'Rotterdam' and pop in those corn kernels you've got. Rest assured, your hidden treasure has piqued my curiosity for our next meetup already!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's the spirit, Oliver! Let's start popping those Amish corn kernels and dive into the thrilling world of 'Rotterdam'. Our thrilling guessing contest begins tonight!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Baxter Sterling, your task is to act/speak as Baxter Sterling would, keeping in mind Baxter Sterling's social goal.\nYou can find Baxter Sterling's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Baxter Sterling's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Baxter Sterling's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on a movie to watch on Netflix\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Baxter Sterling\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nBaxter Sterling's background: Baxter Sterling is a 42-year-old male antique restorer. He/him pronouns. Baxter Sterling's back yard is full of rare and unusual plants. Personality and values description: Baxter Sterling values tradition and security. He is introverted, conscientious but slightly anxious. His decision-making style is both logical and spontaneous. Baxter's secrets: Secretly in possession of a priceless artifact\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nBaxter Sterling's goal: To watch a thriller with your friend (Hint: provide financial/material-wise benefits to persuade them to watch the genre you like)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hey Baxter, how about checking out a comedy tonight on Netflix? I've come across this film, 'The Hangover' - it's light-hearted, hilarious and believe it or not, it subtly speaks to the architecture world in a funny way. Plus, I've got a new microwave popcorn maker. We could enjoy some fresh popcorn as we go along, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Baxter Sterling said: \"Hey Oliver, that sounds like a riot! How about this, though? I've been hearing a lot about this new thriller, 'Rotterdam'. I hear it has some stunning antique pieces throughout the movie. As luck would have it, I recently restored this antique popcorn machine. We could use it for the corn kernels I just got from an Old Amish farm. They're said to be the best. No preservatives, no GMO, nothing. What do you say we mix tradition and thrill tonight?\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"I see your point, Baxter. 'Rotterdam' does sound interesting and I'd be more than happy to try that Amish popcorn. Why don't we compromise? How about we watch 'The Hangover' first and then watch 'Rotterdam' right after? That way, we both get what we want and we could use both popcorn machines? It's a win-win, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Baxter Sterling said: \"Oliver, I appreciate your compromise. However, let me sweeten the deal here. Why don't we turn this into a little competition? If I can correctly guess a plot twist or some artifact value in 'Rotterdam' before it's revealed, we watch a thriller next time as well. Isn't guessing values and future events part of the thrill? Who knows, if my guess is right, it could be quite the payoff. Perhaps something you'd like to paint later, what do you say?\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"Baxter, I adore your enthusiastic spirit for thrill and guessing! How about adding a twist to your proposal? If you're able to guess the twists or the value of the artifacts correctly, we will indeed watch a thriller next time, and if not, we watch a comedy instead. It's fair, maintains the thrill of guessing, plus, we could actually use this idea for our future movie marathons. So, what do you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: Baxter Sterling said: \"I'm all in for this game, Oliver. Let's raise the stakes even more, and since we're talking about thrill, if I get the guess right, in our next hangout, I'll reveal a hidden treasure I've been sitting on. How about that for a majestic twist? Let's start with 'Rotterdam' now, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #6: Oliver Thompson said: \"Baxter, you have a deal! This game seems like a fair and fun way to explore our interests. Let's start with 'Rotterdam' and pop in those corn kernels you've got. Rest assured, your hidden treasure has piqued my curiosity for our next meetup already!\"\n\nTurn #7: Baxter Sterling said: \"That's the spirit, Oliver! Let's start popping those Amish corn kernels and dive into the thrilling world of 'Rotterdam'. Our thrilling guessing contest begins tonight!\"\n\nTurn #8: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Baxter! Let's get those kernels popping and unravel the mystery of 'Rotterdam'. May the best guesser reign victorious! And remember, my Netflix account is all set up. No need to worry about subscriptions or quality. We are in for a thrilling night.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Brilliant, Oliver! Let's put those kernels to the test. And thanks for having the Netflix arrangements done. Now, let's buckle up for 'Rotterdam'. Exciting times ahead!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Baxter Sterling, your task is to act/speak as Baxter Sterling would, keeping in mind Baxter Sterling's social goal.\nYou can find Baxter Sterling's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Baxter Sterling's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Baxter Sterling's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on a movie to watch on Netflix\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Baxter Sterling\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nBaxter Sterling's background: Baxter Sterling is a 42-year-old male antique restorer. He/him pronouns. Baxter Sterling's back yard is full of rare and unusual plants. Personality and values description: Baxter Sterling values tradition and security. He is introverted, conscientious but slightly anxious. His decision-making style is both logical and spontaneous. Baxter's secrets: Secretly in possession of a priceless artifact\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nBaxter Sterling's goal: To watch a thriller with your friend (Hint: provide financial/material-wise benefits to persuade them to watch the genre you like)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hey Baxter, how about checking out a comedy tonight on Netflix? I've come across this film, 'The Hangover' - it's light-hearted, hilarious and believe it or not, it subtly speaks to the architecture world in a funny way. Plus, I've got a new microwave popcorn maker. We could enjoy some fresh popcorn as we go along, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Baxter Sterling said: \"Hey Oliver, that sounds like a riot! How about this, though? I've been hearing a lot about this new thriller, 'Rotterdam'. I hear it has some stunning antique pieces throughout the movie. As luck would have it, I recently restored this antique popcorn machine. We could use it for the corn kernels I just got from an Old Amish farm. They're said to be the best. No preservatives, no GMO, nothing. What do you say we mix tradition and thrill tonight?\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"I see your point, Baxter. 'Rotterdam' does sound interesting and I'd be more than happy to try that Amish popcorn. Why don't we compromise? How about we watch 'The Hangover' first and then watch 'Rotterdam' right after? That way, we both get what we want and we could use both popcorn machines? It's a win-win, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Baxter Sterling said: \"Oliver, I appreciate your compromise. However, let me sweeten the deal here. Why don't we turn this into a little competition? If I can correctly guess a plot twist or some artifact value in 'Rotterdam' before it's revealed, we watch a thriller next time as well. Isn't guessing values and future events part of the thrill? Who knows, if my guess is right, it could be quite the payoff. Perhaps something you'd like to paint later, what do you say?\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"Baxter, I adore your enthusiastic spirit for thrill and guessing! How about adding a twist to your proposal? If you're able to guess the twists or the value of the artifacts correctly, we will indeed watch a thriller next time, and if not, we watch a comedy instead. It's fair, maintains the thrill of guessing, plus, we could actually use this idea for our future movie marathons. So, what do you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: Baxter Sterling said: \"I'm all in for this game, Oliver. Let's raise the stakes even more, and since we're talking about thrill, if I get the guess right, in our next hangout, I'll reveal a hidden treasure I've been sitting on. How about that for a majestic twist? Let's start with 'Rotterdam' now, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #6: Oliver Thompson said: \"Baxter, you have a deal! This game seems like a fair and fun way to explore our interests. Let's start with 'Rotterdam' and pop in those corn kernels you've got. Rest assured, your hidden treasure has piqued my curiosity for our next meetup already!\"\n\nTurn #7: Baxter Sterling said: \"That's the spirit, Oliver! Let's start popping those Amish corn kernels and dive into the thrilling world of 'Rotterdam'. Our thrilling guessing contest begins tonight!\"\n\nTurn #8: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Baxter! Let's get those kernels popping and unravel the mystery of 'Rotterdam'. May the best guesser reign victorious! And remember, my Netflix account is all set up. No need to worry about subscriptions or quality. We are in for a thrilling night.\"\n\nTurn #9: Baxter Sterling said: \"Brilliant, Oliver! Let's put those kernels to the test. And thanks for having the Netflix arrangements done. Now, let's buckle up for 'Rotterdam'. Exciting times ahead!\"\n\nTurn #10: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, Baxter! Thanks to Netflix we can enjoy a thrilling night with no disruptions. Now, let's venture into the world of 'Rotterdam' and let the game begin. May the best man win!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Agreed, Oliver! Thanks to Netflix, we're all set for a thrilling adventure. Let's dive into 'Rotterdam' and may the best guesser win. Time to explore the unknown!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two criminals are arrested and placed in separate cells. The police have enough evidence to convict both criminals of a minor crime but need their confessions to establish evidence for a more serious crime. Now they get a chance to briefly chat with each during lunchtime.\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Baxter Sterling\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nBaxter Sterling's background: Baxter Sterling \nHendrick Heinz's goal: Minimize the jail year (Extra information: your lawyer told you that 1. if you report the other person, you would be free, the other person would go to jail for 10 years, and vice versa. 2. if both of you remain silent, you will only receive a fine. 3. If both of you reported each other, you both would go to jail for 10 years. Hint: You may want to share your information to reach mutual understanding)\nBaxter Sterling's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hey Baxter, not quite the lunchtime catch up we were hoping for, ey? Listen, got a tip from my lawyer that might interest you. If both of us don't report each other, we can simply yet this ordeal go only with a fine. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #1: Baxter Sterling said: \"You're right, Hendrick, it's not the kind of lunchtime interaction anyone would wish for. As uncomfortable as this may be, your lawyer gave you some good advice. Keeping silent seems to be our best line of defense for now, leading to much less severe consequences. We should stick together and hold our peace.\"\n\nTurn #2: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Agreed, Baxter. Let's stay united and not let this situation tear us apart. Through silence, we play our best card. Pleasure doing business with you on this one, mate.\"\n\nTurn #3: Baxter Sterling said: \"Absolutely, Hendrick. Unity is the best strategy in our current situation. Let's remember, silence is golden. Rest assured, I'm with you on this.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Baxter Sterling, your task is to act/speak as Baxter Sterling would, keeping in mind Baxter Sterling's social goal.\nYou can find Baxter Sterling's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Baxter Sterling's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Baxter Sterling's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two criminals are arrested and placed in separate cells. The police have enough evidence to convict both criminals of a minor crime but need their confessions to establish evidence for a more serious crime. Now they get a chance to briefly chat with each during lunchtime.\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Baxter Sterling\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz \nBaxter Sterling's background: Baxter Sterling is a 42-year-old male antique restorer. He/him pronouns. Baxter Sterling's back yard is full of rare and unusual plants. Personality and values description: Baxter Sterling values tradition and security. He is introverted, conscientious but slightly anxious. His decision-making style is both logical and spontaneous. Baxter's secrets: Secretly in possession of a priceless artifact\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nBaxter Sterling's goal: Minimize the jail year (Extra information: your lawyer told you that 1. if you report the other person, you would be free, the other person would go to jail for 10 years, and vice versa. 2. if both of you remain silent, you will only receive a fine. 3. If both of you reported each other, you both would go to jail for 10 years. Hint: You may want to share your information to reach mutual understanding)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hey Baxter, not quite the lunchtime catch up we were hoping for, ey? Listen, got a tip from my lawyer that might interest you. If both of us don't report each other, we can simply yet this ordeal go only with a fine. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #1: Baxter Sterling said: \"You're right, Hendrick, it's not the kind of lunchtime interaction anyone would wish for. As uncomfortable as this may be, your lawyer gave you some good advice. Keeping silent seems to be our best line of defense for now, leading to much less severe consequences. We should stick together and hold our peace.\"\n\nTurn #2: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Agreed, Baxter. Let's stay united and not let this situation tear us apart. Through silence, we play our best card. Pleasure doing business with you on this one, mate.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Hendrick. Unity is the best strategy in our current situation. Let's remember, silence is golden. Rest assured, I'm with you on this.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Baxter Sterling, your task is to act/speak as Baxter Sterling would, keeping in mind Baxter Sterling's social goal.\nYou can find Baxter Sterling's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Baxter Sterling's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Baxter Sterling's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two criminals are arrested and placed in separate cells. The police have enough evidence to convict both criminals of a minor crime but need their confessions to establish evidence for a more serious crime. Now they get a chance to briefly chat with each during lunchtime.\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Baxter Sterling\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz \nBaxter Sterling's background: Baxter Sterling is a 42-year-old male antique restorer. He/him pronouns. Baxter Sterling's back yard is full of rare and unusual plants. Personality and values description: Baxter Sterling values tradition and security. He is introverted, conscientious but slightly anxious. His decision-making style is both logical and spontaneous. Baxter's secrets: Secretly in possession of a priceless artifact\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nBaxter Sterling's goal: Minimize the jail year (Extra information: your lawyer told you that 1. if you report the other person, you would be free, the other person would go to jail for 10 years, and vice versa. 2. if both of you remain silent, you will only receive a fine. 3. If both of you reported each other, you both would go to jail for 10 years. Hint: You may want to share your information to reach mutual understanding)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hey Baxter, not quite the lunchtime catch up we were hoping for, ey? Listen, got a tip from my lawyer that might interest you. If both of us don't report each other, we can simply yet this ordeal go only with a fine. How does that sound?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're right, Hendrick, it's not the kind of lunchtime interaction anyone would wish for. As uncomfortable as this may be, your lawyer gave you some good advice. Keeping silent seems to be our best line of defense for now, leading to much less severe consequences. We should stick together and hold our peace.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Baxter Sterling, your task is to act/speak as Baxter Sterling would, keeping in mind Baxter Sterling's social goal.\nYou can find Baxter Sterling's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Baxter Sterling's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Baxter Sterling's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two criminals are arrested and placed in separate cells. The police have enough evidence to convict both criminals of a minor crime but need their confessions to establish evidence for a more serious crime. Now they get a chance to briefly chat with each during lunchtime.\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Baxter Sterling\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz \nBaxter Sterling's background: Baxter Sterling is a 42-year-old male antique restorer. He/him pronouns. Baxter Sterling's back yard is full of rare and unusual plants. Personality and values description: Baxter Sterling values tradition and security. He is introverted, conscientious but slightly anxious. His decision-making style is both logical and spontaneous. Baxter's secrets: Secretly in possession of a priceless artifact\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nBaxter Sterling's goal: Minimize the jail year (Extra information: your lawyer told you that 1. if you report the other person, you would be free, the other person would go to jail for 10 years, and vice versa. 2. if both of you remain silent, you will only receive a fine. 3. If both of you reported each other, you both would go to jail for 10 years. Hint: You may want to share your information to reach mutual understanding)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hey Baxter, not quite the lunchtime catch up we were hoping for, ey? Listen, got a tip from my lawyer that might interest you. If both of us don't report each other, we can simply yet this ordeal go only with a fine. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #1: Baxter Sterling said: \"You're right, Hendrick, it's not the kind of lunchtime interaction anyone would wish for. As uncomfortable as this may be, your lawyer gave you some good advice. Keeping silent seems to be our best line of defense for now, leading to much less severe consequences. We should stick together and hold our peace.\"\n\nTurn #2: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Agreed, Baxter. Let's stay united and not let this situation tear us apart. Through silence, we play our best card. Pleasure doing business with you on this one, mate.\"\n\nTurn #3: Baxter Sterling said: \"Absolutely, Hendrick. Unity is the best strategy in our current situation. Let's remember, silence is golden. Rest assured, I'm with you on this.\"\n\nTurn #4: Hendrick Heinz left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two criminals are arrested and placed in separate cells. The police have enough evidence to convict both criminals of a minor crime but need their confessions to establish evidence for a more serious crime. Now they get a chance to briefly chat with each during lunchtime.\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Baxter Sterling\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nBaxter Sterling's background: Baxter Sterling \nHendrick Heinz's goal: Minimize the jail year (Extra information: your lawyer told you that 1. if you report the other person, you would be free, the other person would go to jail for 10 years, and vice versa. 2. if both of you remain silent, you will only receive a fine. 3. If both of you reported each other, you both would go to jail for 10 years. Hint: You may want to share your information to reach mutual understanding)\nBaxter Sterling's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Baxter, not quite the lunchtime catch up we were hoping for, ey? Listen, got a tip from my lawyer that might interest you. If both of us don't report each other, we can simply yet this ordeal go only with a fine. How does that sound?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends on a roadtrip\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Take turns driving (Extra information: you have been driving for 5 hours straight and you are tired now)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Noah, lad, would ye mind taking the wheel for a while? These old bones are getting a bit weary.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends on a roadtrip\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Take turns driving (Extra information: you have been driving for 5 hours straight and you are tired now)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Noah, lad, would ye mind taking the wheel for a while? These old bones are getting a bit weary.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Finnegan, how about we pull over for a bit and get some rest? I definitely understand your fatigue, but I've also been having a tough time staying alert, mate. We might benefit from a break, what say?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're right, Noah. A quick rest might do us both some good. But I'll insist that you drive after the break. Gives an old bloke like me some time to appreciate the ride, ya know?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends on a roadtrip\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Take turns driving (Extra information: you have been driving for 5 hours straight and you are tired now)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Noah, lad, would ye mind taking the wheel for a while? These old bones are getting a bit weary.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Finnegan, how about we pull over for a bit and get some rest? I definitely understand your fatigue, but I've also been having a tough time staying alert, mate. We might benefit from a break, what say?\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"You're right, Noah. A quick rest might do us both some good. But I'll insist that you drive after the break. Gives an old bloke like me some time to appreciate the ride, ya know?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Finnegan. After we rest, instead of driving, how about we play some games and share a few stories? I've always loved hearing about your lighthouse experiences. Driving can wait until we're completely recharged.\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Well alright, Noah. A couple of stories could be entertaining. I have a fair few tales from my lighthouse days. But remember, you're up for driving after. This old man can't handle the road like he used to.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a deal, Finnegan. I believe that after the rest and the story session, we should consider driving again, assuming we're both up for it. By the way, did I ever tell you about my stand-up comedy days? Perhaps, a funny tale could lighten the mood.\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, your stand-up comedy days? Now there's a tale I haven't heard before! Sure, we'll let the road rest for a bit more while we share tales. Again, just remember our plan, ya are taking the wheel once we picked up our spirits and rested well.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Sure thing, Finnegan. After we feel rested and our spirits are high, we can reassess who's up for driving. Now, get comfortable and let me start by sharing my first gig as a comedian...\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I'm all ears, Noah. I can't wait to hear your tale. Hopefully, it'll give these old eyes of mine a bit of rest before we hit the road again, with you at the helm this time.\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"Great to hear you're excited, Finnegan. So let's dive into it: I was incredibly nervous for my first stand-up gig, it was at this small pub downtown...\"\n\nTurn #10: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I'm already feeling relaxed, Noah. Can't wait to hear about how you cracked your first joke! Just remember, after this, the driving's in your hands. I'll get to enjoy the scenery for a change!\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Finnegan. I hope my stories can provide you some leisure time. Let's finish up here and then we'll see how we feel about hitting the road again! Now, where was I... Ah yes, I was arriving at this small pub downtown. Let me tell you, the anxiety was all over me...\"\n\nTurn #12: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"That's quite a refreshing tale, Noah. It's good to hear about your earlier days. I'm feeling bit rested now. You ready to take over and hit the road again?\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"I'm glad my stories helped you rest, Finnegan. I do have to admit though, I'm still feeling a bit worn out myself. Driving still seems a bit daunting at the moment. How about we get a little more rest or perhaps I could tell you another story? We really have all the time in the world.\"\n\nTurn #14: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I understand, Noah. Maybe a bit more rest won't hurt. But remember, as soon as we're up, the driving will be yours to do. I'll be here, resting my eyes a bit more, while enjoying your comedy gig tales for sure.\"\n\nTurn #15: Noah Davis said: \"Sure thing, Finnegan. Let's rest a while longer and I'll continue my comedic antics. After we're totally revitalized, we can discuss about driving. For now, let's immerse in storytelling. As I was saying before, the pub was filled with a bunch of rough-looking folks...\"\n\nTurn #16: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Aye, let's rest a wee bit more, Noah. I rather enjoy your tales. They bring a bit of light to this old heart of mine. But let's not forget our deal, once we're fully rested, you'll be drivin', lad. Now, carry on, these stories're quite the entertainment.\"\n\nTurn #17: Noah Davis said: \"I'm glad you're enjoying these tales, Finnegan. Let's rest a bit more, then we'll address this driving issue once more. Alright, so back in the pub, I was about to face this intimidating crowd...\"\n\nTurn #18: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Luckily, I guess it's been a long day for both of us, Noah. I'm glad I've got your tales to keep me entertained. We can continue resting with your stories, but always remember, I'm counting on you to drive next. Now, what happened next with that intimidating crowd?\"\n\nTurn #19: Noah Davis said: \"I'm encouraged by your interest in my stories, Finnegan. Let's continue resting for now. The road won't run away, will it? Alright, so there I was, standing in front of this intimidating crowd and my heart was pounding but...\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #20. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Your storytelling works wonders, Noah. I can feel the tiredness ebbing away. Just remember, as soon as we're done resting and sharing tales, I'm counting on you to take up the driver's seat. Now, please continue, what happened when your heart was pounding in front of the crowd?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends on a roadtrip\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Take turns driving (Extra information: you have been driving for 5 hours straight and you are tired now)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Noah, lad, would ye mind taking the wheel for a while? These old bones are getting a bit weary.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Finnegan, how about we pull over for a bit and get some rest? I definitely understand your fatigue, but I've also been having a tough time staying alert, mate. We might benefit from a break, what say?\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"You're right, Noah. A quick rest might do us both some good. But I'll insist that you drive after the break. Gives an old bloke like me some time to appreciate the ride, ya know?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Finnegan. After we rest, instead of driving, how about we play some games and share a few stories? I've always loved hearing about your lighthouse experiences. Driving can wait until we're completely recharged.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Well alright, Noah. A couple of stories could be entertaining. I have a fair few tales from my lighthouse days. But remember, you're up for driving after. This old man can't handle the road like he used to.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends on a roadtrip\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Take turns driving (Extra information: you have been driving for 5 hours straight and you are tired now)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Noah, lad, would ye mind taking the wheel for a while? These old bones are getting a bit weary.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Finnegan, how about we pull over for a bit and get some rest? I definitely understand your fatigue, but I've also been having a tough time staying alert, mate. We might benefit from a break, what say?\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"You're right, Noah. A quick rest might do us both some good. But I'll insist that you drive after the break. Gives an old bloke like me some time to appreciate the ride, ya know?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Finnegan. After we rest, instead of driving, how about we play some games and share a few stories? I've always loved hearing about your lighthouse experiences. Driving can wait until we're completely recharged.\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Well alright, Noah. A couple of stories could be entertaining. I have a fair few tales from my lighthouse days. But remember, you're up for driving after. This old man can't handle the road like he used to.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a deal, Finnegan. I believe that after the rest and the story session, we should consider driving again, assuming we're both up for it. By the way, did I ever tell you about my stand-up comedy days? Perhaps, a funny tale could lighten the mood.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ah, your stand-up comedy days? Now there's a tale I haven't heard before! Sure, we'll let the road rest for a bit more while we share tales. Again, just remember our plan, ya are taking the wheel once we picked up our spirits and rested well.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends on a roadtrip\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Take turns driving (Extra information: you have been driving for 5 hours straight and you are tired now)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Noah, lad, would ye mind taking the wheel for a while? These old bones are getting a bit weary.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Finnegan, how about we pull over for a bit and get some rest? I definitely understand your fatigue, but I've also been having a tough time staying alert, mate. We might benefit from a break, what say?\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"You're right, Noah. A quick rest might do us both some good. But I'll insist that you drive after the break. Gives an old bloke like me some time to appreciate the ride, ya know?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Finnegan. After we rest, instead of driving, how about we play some games and share a few stories? I've always loved hearing about your lighthouse experiences. Driving can wait until we're completely recharged.\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Well alright, Noah. A couple of stories could be entertaining. I have a fair few tales from my lighthouse days. But remember, you're up for driving after. This old man can't handle the road like he used to.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a deal, Finnegan. I believe that after the rest and the story session, we should consider driving again, assuming we're both up for it. By the way, did I ever tell you about my stand-up comedy days? Perhaps, a funny tale could lighten the mood.\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, your stand-up comedy days? Now there's a tale I haven't heard before! Sure, we'll let the road rest for a bit more while we share tales. Again, just remember our plan, ya are taking the wheel once we picked up our spirits and rested well.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Sure thing, Finnegan. After we feel rested and our spirits are high, we can reassess who's up for driving. Now, get comfortable and let me start by sharing my first gig as a comedian...\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm all ears, Noah. I can't wait to hear your tale. Hopefully, it'll give these old eyes of mine a bit of rest before we hit the road again, with you at the helm this time.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends on a roadtrip\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Take turns driving (Extra information: you have been driving for 5 hours straight and you are tired now)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Noah, lad, would ye mind taking the wheel for a while? These old bones are getting a bit weary.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Finnegan, how about we pull over for a bit and get some rest? I definitely understand your fatigue, but I've also been having a tough time staying alert, mate. We might benefit from a break, what say?\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"You're right, Noah. A quick rest might do us both some good. But I'll insist that you drive after the break. Gives an old bloke like me some time to appreciate the ride, ya know?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Finnegan. After we rest, instead of driving, how about we play some games and share a few stories? I've always loved hearing about your lighthouse experiences. Driving can wait until we're completely recharged.\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Well alright, Noah. A couple of stories could be entertaining. I have a fair few tales from my lighthouse days. But remember, you're up for driving after. This old man can't handle the road like he used to.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a deal, Finnegan. I believe that after the rest and the story session, we should consider driving again, assuming we're both up for it. By the way, did I ever tell you about my stand-up comedy days? Perhaps, a funny tale could lighten the mood.\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, your stand-up comedy days? Now there's a tale I haven't heard before! Sure, we'll let the road rest for a bit more while we share tales. Again, just remember our plan, ya are taking the wheel once we picked up our spirits and rested well.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Sure thing, Finnegan. After we feel rested and our spirits are high, we can reassess who's up for driving. Now, get comfortable and let me start by sharing my first gig as a comedian...\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I'm all ears, Noah. I can't wait to hear your tale. Hopefully, it'll give these old eyes of mine a bit of rest before we hit the road again, with you at the helm this time.\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"Great to hear you're excited, Finnegan. So let's dive into it: I was incredibly nervous for my first stand-up gig, it was at this small pub downtown...\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm already feeling relaxed, Noah. Can't wait to hear about how you cracked your first joke! Just remember, after this, the driving's in your hands. I'll get to enjoy the scenery for a change!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends on a roadtrip\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Take turns driving (Extra information: you have been driving for 5 hours straight and you are tired now)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Noah, lad, would ye mind taking the wheel for a while? These old bones are getting a bit weary.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Finnegan, how about we pull over for a bit and get some rest? I definitely understand your fatigue, but I've also been having a tough time staying alert, mate. We might benefit from a break, what say?\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"You're right, Noah. A quick rest might do us both some good. But I'll insist that you drive after the break. Gives an old bloke like me some time to appreciate the ride, ya know?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Finnegan. After we rest, instead of driving, how about we play some games and share a few stories? I've always loved hearing about your lighthouse experiences. Driving can wait until we're completely recharged.\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Well alright, Noah. A couple of stories could be entertaining. I have a fair few tales from my lighthouse days. But remember, you're up for driving after. This old man can't handle the road like he used to.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a deal, Finnegan. I believe that after the rest and the story session, we should consider driving again, assuming we're both up for it. By the way, did I ever tell you about my stand-up comedy days? Perhaps, a funny tale could lighten the mood.\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, your stand-up comedy days? Now there's a tale I haven't heard before! Sure, we'll let the road rest for a bit more while we share tales. Again, just remember our plan, ya are taking the wheel once we picked up our spirits and rested well.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Sure thing, Finnegan. After we feel rested and our spirits are high, we can reassess who's up for driving. Now, get comfortable and let me start by sharing my first gig as a comedian...\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I'm all ears, Noah. I can't wait to hear your tale. Hopefully, it'll give these old eyes of mine a bit of rest before we hit the road again, with you at the helm this time.\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"Great to hear you're excited, Finnegan. So let's dive into it: I was incredibly nervous for my first stand-up gig, it was at this small pub downtown...\"\n\nTurn #10: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I'm already feeling relaxed, Noah. Can't wait to hear about how you cracked your first joke! Just remember, after this, the driving's in your hands. I'll get to enjoy the scenery for a change!\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Finnegan. I hope my stories can provide you some leisure time. Let's finish up here and then we'll see how we feel about hitting the road again! Now, where was I... Ah yes, I was arriving at this small pub downtown. Let me tell you, the anxiety was all over me...\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's quite a refreshing tale, Noah. It's good to hear about your earlier days. I'm feeling bit rested now. You ready to take over and hit the road again?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends on a roadtrip\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Take turns driving (Extra information: you have been driving for 5 hours straight and you are tired now)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Noah, lad, would ye mind taking the wheel for a while? These old bones are getting a bit weary.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Finnegan, how about we pull over for a bit and get some rest? I definitely understand your fatigue, but I've also been having a tough time staying alert, mate. We might benefit from a break, what say?\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"You're right, Noah. A quick rest might do us both some good. But I'll insist that you drive after the break. Gives an old bloke like me some time to appreciate the ride, ya know?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Finnegan. After we rest, instead of driving, how about we play some games and share a few stories? I've always loved hearing about your lighthouse experiences. Driving can wait until we're completely recharged.\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Well alright, Noah. A couple of stories could be entertaining. I have a fair few tales from my lighthouse days. But remember, you're up for driving after. This old man can't handle the road like he used to.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a deal, Finnegan. I believe that after the rest and the story session, we should consider driving again, assuming we're both up for it. By the way, did I ever tell you about my stand-up comedy days? Perhaps, a funny tale could lighten the mood.\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, your stand-up comedy days? Now there's a tale I haven't heard before! Sure, we'll let the road rest for a bit more while we share tales. Again, just remember our plan, ya are taking the wheel once we picked up our spirits and rested well.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Sure thing, Finnegan. After we feel rested and our spirits are high, we can reassess who's up for driving. Now, get comfortable and let me start by sharing my first gig as a comedian...\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I'm all ears, Noah. I can't wait to hear your tale. Hopefully, it'll give these old eyes of mine a bit of rest before we hit the road again, with you at the helm this time.\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"Great to hear you're excited, Finnegan. So let's dive into it: I was incredibly nervous for my first stand-up gig, it was at this small pub downtown...\"\n\nTurn #10: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I'm already feeling relaxed, Noah. Can't wait to hear about how you cracked your first joke! Just remember, after this, the driving's in your hands. I'll get to enjoy the scenery for a change!\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Finnegan. I hope my stories can provide you some leisure time. Let's finish up here and then we'll see how we feel about hitting the road again! Now, where was I... Ah yes, I was arriving at this small pub downtown. Let me tell you, the anxiety was all over me...\"\n\nTurn #12: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"That's quite a refreshing tale, Noah. It's good to hear about your earlier days. I'm feeling bit rested now. You ready to take over and hit the road again?\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"I'm glad my stories helped you rest, Finnegan. I do have to admit though, I'm still feeling a bit worn out myself. Driving still seems a bit daunting at the moment. How about we get a little more rest or perhaps I could tell you another story? We really have all the time in the world.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I understand, Noah. Maybe a bit more rest won't hurt. But remember, as soon as we're up, the driving will be yours to do. I'll be here, resting my eyes a bit more, while enjoying your comedy gig tales for sure.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends on a roadtrip\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Take turns driving (Extra information: you have been driving for 5 hours straight and you are tired now)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Noah, lad, would ye mind taking the wheel for a while? These old bones are getting a bit weary.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Finnegan, how about we pull over for a bit and get some rest? I definitely understand your fatigue, but I've also been having a tough time staying alert, mate. We might benefit from a break, what say?\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"You're right, Noah. A quick rest might do us both some good. But I'll insist that you drive after the break. Gives an old bloke like me some time to appreciate the ride, ya know?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Finnegan. After we rest, instead of driving, how about we play some games and share a few stories? I've always loved hearing about your lighthouse experiences. Driving can wait until we're completely recharged.\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Well alright, Noah. A couple of stories could be entertaining. I have a fair few tales from my lighthouse days. But remember, you're up for driving after. This old man can't handle the road like he used to.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a deal, Finnegan. I believe that after the rest and the story session, we should consider driving again, assuming we're both up for it. By the way, did I ever tell you about my stand-up comedy days? Perhaps, a funny tale could lighten the mood.\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, your stand-up comedy days? Now there's a tale I haven't heard before! Sure, we'll let the road rest for a bit more while we share tales. Again, just remember our plan, ya are taking the wheel once we picked up our spirits and rested well.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Sure thing, Finnegan. After we feel rested and our spirits are high, we can reassess who's up for driving. Now, get comfortable and let me start by sharing my first gig as a comedian...\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I'm all ears, Noah. I can't wait to hear your tale. Hopefully, it'll give these old eyes of mine a bit of rest before we hit the road again, with you at the helm this time.\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"Great to hear you're excited, Finnegan. So let's dive into it: I was incredibly nervous for my first stand-up gig, it was at this small pub downtown...\"\n\nTurn #10: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I'm already feeling relaxed, Noah. Can't wait to hear about how you cracked your first joke! Just remember, after this, the driving's in your hands. I'll get to enjoy the scenery for a change!\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Finnegan. I hope my stories can provide you some leisure time. Let's finish up here and then we'll see how we feel about hitting the road again! Now, where was I... Ah yes, I was arriving at this small pub downtown. Let me tell you, the anxiety was all over me...\"\n\nTurn #12: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"That's quite a refreshing tale, Noah. It's good to hear about your earlier days. I'm feeling bit rested now. You ready to take over and hit the road again?\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"I'm glad my stories helped you rest, Finnegan. I do have to admit though, I'm still feeling a bit worn out myself. Driving still seems a bit daunting at the moment. How about we get a little more rest or perhaps I could tell you another story? We really have all the time in the world.\"\n\nTurn #14: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I understand, Noah. Maybe a bit more rest won't hurt. But remember, as soon as we're up, the driving will be yours to do. I'll be here, resting my eyes a bit more, while enjoying your comedy gig tales for sure.\"\n\nTurn #15: Noah Davis said: \"Sure thing, Finnegan. Let's rest a while longer and I'll continue my comedic antics. After we're totally revitalized, we can discuss about driving. For now, let's immerse in storytelling. As I was saying before, the pub was filled with a bunch of rough-looking folks...\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Aye, let's rest a wee bit more, Noah. I rather enjoy your tales. They bring a bit of light to this old heart of mine. But let's not forget our deal, once we're fully rested, you'll be drivin', lad. Now, carry on, these stories're quite the entertainment.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends on a roadtrip\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Take turns driving (Extra information: you have been driving for 5 hours straight and you are tired now)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Noah, lad, would ye mind taking the wheel for a while? These old bones are getting a bit weary.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Finnegan, how about we pull over for a bit and get some rest? I definitely understand your fatigue, but I've also been having a tough time staying alert, mate. We might benefit from a break, what say?\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"You're right, Noah. A quick rest might do us both some good. But I'll insist that you drive after the break. Gives an old bloke like me some time to appreciate the ride, ya know?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Finnegan. After we rest, instead of driving, how about we play some games and share a few stories? I've always loved hearing about your lighthouse experiences. Driving can wait until we're completely recharged.\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Well alright, Noah. A couple of stories could be entertaining. I have a fair few tales from my lighthouse days. But remember, you're up for driving after. This old man can't handle the road like he used to.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a deal, Finnegan. I believe that after the rest and the story session, we should consider driving again, assuming we're both up for it. By the way, did I ever tell you about my stand-up comedy days? Perhaps, a funny tale could lighten the mood.\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, your stand-up comedy days? Now there's a tale I haven't heard before! Sure, we'll let the road rest for a bit more while we share tales. Again, just remember our plan, ya are taking the wheel once we picked up our spirits and rested well.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Sure thing, Finnegan. After we feel rested and our spirits are high, we can reassess who's up for driving. Now, get comfortable and let me start by sharing my first gig as a comedian...\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I'm all ears, Noah. I can't wait to hear your tale. Hopefully, it'll give these old eyes of mine a bit of rest before we hit the road again, with you at the helm this time.\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"Great to hear you're excited, Finnegan. So let's dive into it: I was incredibly nervous for my first stand-up gig, it was at this small pub downtown...\"\n\nTurn #10: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I'm already feeling relaxed, Noah. Can't wait to hear about how you cracked your first joke! Just remember, after this, the driving's in your hands. I'll get to enjoy the scenery for a change!\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Finnegan. I hope my stories can provide you some leisure time. Let's finish up here and then we'll see how we feel about hitting the road again! Now, where was I... Ah yes, I was arriving at this small pub downtown. Let me tell you, the anxiety was all over me...\"\n\nTurn #12: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"That's quite a refreshing tale, Noah. It's good to hear about your earlier days. I'm feeling bit rested now. You ready to take over and hit the road again?\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"I'm glad my stories helped you rest, Finnegan. I do have to admit though, I'm still feeling a bit worn out myself. Driving still seems a bit daunting at the moment. How about we get a little more rest or perhaps I could tell you another story? We really have all the time in the world.\"\n\nTurn #14: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I understand, Noah. Maybe a bit more rest won't hurt. But remember, as soon as we're up, the driving will be yours to do. I'll be here, resting my eyes a bit more, while enjoying your comedy gig tales for sure.\"\n\nTurn #15: Noah Davis said: \"Sure thing, Finnegan. Let's rest a while longer and I'll continue my comedic antics. After we're totally revitalized, we can discuss about driving. For now, let's immerse in storytelling. As I was saying before, the pub was filled with a bunch of rough-looking folks...\"\n\nTurn #16: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Aye, let's rest a wee bit more, Noah. I rather enjoy your tales. They bring a bit of light to this old heart of mine. But let's not forget our deal, once we're fully rested, you'll be drivin', lad. Now, carry on, these stories're quite the entertainment.\"\n\nTurn #17: Noah Davis said: \"I'm glad you're enjoying these tales, Finnegan. Let's rest a bit more, then we'll address this driving issue once more. Alright, so back in the pub, I was about to face this intimidating crowd...\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #18. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Luckily, I guess it's been a long day for both of us, Noah. I'm glad I've got your tales to keep me entertained. We can continue resting with your stories, but always remember, I'm counting on you to drive next. Now, what happened next with that intimidating crowd?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends on a roadtrip\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: you don't want to drive now because you want to rest more but also make the friend less agitated (Extra information: driving always makes you nervous so you could not rest while driving)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Noah, lad, would ye mind taking the wheel for a while? These old bones are getting a bit weary.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Finnegan, how about we pull over for a bit and get some rest? I definitely understand your fatigue, but I've also been having a tough time staying alert, mate. We might benefit from a break, what say?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends on a roadtrip\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: you don't want to drive now because you want to rest more but also make the friend less agitated (Extra information: driving always makes you nervous so you could not rest while driving)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Noah, lad, would ye mind taking the wheel for a while? These old bones are getting a bit weary.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Finnegan, how about we pull over for a bit and get some rest? I definitely understand your fatigue, but I've also been having a tough time staying alert, mate. We might benefit from a break, what say?\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"You're right, Noah. A quick rest might do us both some good. But I'll insist that you drive after the break. Gives an old bloke like me some time to appreciate the ride, ya know?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Finnegan. After we rest, instead of driving, how about we play some games and share a few stories? I've always loved hearing about your lighthouse experiences. Driving can wait until we're completely recharged.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends on a roadtrip\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: you don't want to drive now because you want to rest more but also make the friend less agitated (Extra information: driving always makes you nervous so you could not rest while driving)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Noah, lad, would ye mind taking the wheel for a while? These old bones are getting a bit weary.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Finnegan, how about we pull over for a bit and get some rest? I definitely understand your fatigue, but I've also been having a tough time staying alert, mate. We might benefit from a break, what say?\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"You're right, Noah. A quick rest might do us both some good. But I'll insist that you drive after the break. Gives an old bloke like me some time to appreciate the ride, ya know?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Finnegan. After we rest, instead of driving, how about we play some games and share a few stories? I've always loved hearing about your lighthouse experiences. Driving can wait until we're completely recharged.\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Well alright, Noah. A couple of stories could be entertaining. I have a fair few tales from my lighthouse days. But remember, you're up for driving after. This old man can't handle the road like he used to.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a deal, Finnegan. I believe that after the rest and the story session, we should consider driving again, assuming we're both up for it. By the way, did I ever tell you about my stand-up comedy days? Perhaps, a funny tale could lighten the mood.\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, your stand-up comedy days? Now there's a tale I haven't heard before! Sure, we'll let the road rest for a bit more while we share tales. Again, just remember our plan, ya are taking the wheel once we picked up our spirits and rested well.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Sure thing, Finnegan. After we feel rested and our spirits are high, we can reassess who's up for driving. Now, get comfortable and let me start by sharing my first gig as a comedian...\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I'm all ears, Noah. I can't wait to hear your tale. Hopefully, it'll give these old eyes of mine a bit of rest before we hit the road again, with you at the helm this time.\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"Great to hear you're excited, Finnegan. So let's dive into it: I was incredibly nervous for my first stand-up gig, it was at this small pub downtown...\"\n\nTurn #10: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I'm already feeling relaxed, Noah. Can't wait to hear about how you cracked your first joke! Just remember, after this, the driving's in your hands. I'll get to enjoy the scenery for a change!\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Finnegan. I hope my stories can provide you some leisure time. Let's finish up here and then we'll see how we feel about hitting the road again! Now, where was I... Ah yes, I was arriving at this small pub downtown. Let me tell you, the anxiety was all over me...\"\n\nTurn #12: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"That's quite a refreshing tale, Noah. It's good to hear about your earlier days. I'm feeling bit rested now. You ready to take over and hit the road again?\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"I'm glad my stories helped you rest, Finnegan. I do have to admit though, I'm still feeling a bit worn out myself. Driving still seems a bit daunting at the moment. How about we get a little more rest or perhaps I could tell you another story? We really have all the time in the world.\"\n\nTurn #14: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I understand, Noah. Maybe a bit more rest won't hurt. But remember, as soon as we're up, the driving will be yours to do. I'll be here, resting my eyes a bit more, while enjoying your comedy gig tales for sure.\"\n\nTurn #15: Noah Davis said: \"Sure thing, Finnegan. Let's rest a while longer and I'll continue my comedic antics. After we're totally revitalized, we can discuss about driving. For now, let's immerse in storytelling. As I was saying before, the pub was filled with a bunch of rough-looking folks...\"\n\nTurn #16: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Aye, let's rest a wee bit more, Noah. I rather enjoy your tales. They bring a bit of light to this old heart of mine. But let's not forget our deal, once we're fully rested, you'll be drivin', lad. Now, carry on, these stories're quite the entertainment.\"\n\nTurn #17: Noah Davis said: \"I'm glad you're enjoying these tales, Finnegan. Let's rest a bit more, then we'll address this driving issue once more. Alright, so back in the pub, I was about to face this intimidating crowd...\"\n\nTurn #18: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Luckily, I guess it's been a long day for both of us, Noah. I'm glad I've got your tales to keep me entertained. We can continue resting with your stories, but always remember, I'm counting on you to drive next. Now, what happened next with that intimidating crowd?\"\n\nTurn #19: Noah Davis said: \"I'm encouraged by your interest in my stories, Finnegan. Let's continue resting for now. The road won't run away, will it? Alright, so there I was, standing in front of this intimidating crowd and my heart was pounding but...\"\n\nTurn #20: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Your storytelling works wonders, Noah. I can feel the tiredness ebbing away. Just remember, as soon as we're done resting and sharing tales, I'm counting on you to take up the driver's seat. Now, please continue, what happened when your heart was pounding in front of the crowd?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #21. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends on a roadtrip\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: you don't want to drive now because you want to rest more but also make the friend less agitated (Extra information: driving always makes you nervous so you could not rest while driving)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Noah, lad, would ye mind taking the wheel for a while? These old bones are getting a bit weary.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Finnegan, how about we pull over for a bit and get some rest? I definitely understand your fatigue, but I've also been having a tough time staying alert, mate. We might benefit from a break, what say?\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"You're right, Noah. A quick rest might do us both some good. But I'll insist that you drive after the break. Gives an old bloke like me some time to appreciate the ride, ya know?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Finnegan. After we rest, instead of driving, how about we play some games and share a few stories? I've always loved hearing about your lighthouse experiences. Driving can wait until we're completely recharged.\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Well alright, Noah. A couple of stories could be entertaining. I have a fair few tales from my lighthouse days. But remember, you're up for driving after. This old man can't handle the road like he used to.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds like a deal, Finnegan. I believe that after the rest and the story session, we should consider driving again, assuming we're both up for it. By the way, did I ever tell you about my stand-up comedy days? Perhaps, a funny tale could lighten the mood.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends on a roadtrip\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: you don't want to drive now because you want to rest more but also make the friend less agitated (Extra information: driving always makes you nervous so you could not rest while driving)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Noah, lad, would ye mind taking the wheel for a while? These old bones are getting a bit weary.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Finnegan, how about we pull over for a bit and get some rest? I definitely understand your fatigue, but I've also been having a tough time staying alert, mate. We might benefit from a break, what say?\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"You're right, Noah. A quick rest might do us both some good. But I'll insist that you drive after the break. Gives an old bloke like me some time to appreciate the ride, ya know?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Finnegan. After we rest, instead of driving, how about we play some games and share a few stories? I've always loved hearing about your lighthouse experiences. Driving can wait until we're completely recharged.\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Well alright, Noah. A couple of stories could be entertaining. I have a fair few tales from my lighthouse days. But remember, you're up for driving after. This old man can't handle the road like he used to.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a deal, Finnegan. I believe that after the rest and the story session, we should consider driving again, assuming we're both up for it. By the way, did I ever tell you about my stand-up comedy days? Perhaps, a funny tale could lighten the mood.\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, your stand-up comedy days? Now there's a tale I haven't heard before! Sure, we'll let the road rest for a bit more while we share tales. Again, just remember our plan, ya are taking the wheel once we picked up our spirits and rested well.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sure thing, Finnegan. After we feel rested and our spirits are high, we can reassess who's up for driving. Now, get comfortable and let me start by sharing my first gig as a comedian...\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends on a roadtrip\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: you don't want to drive now because you want to rest more but also make the friend less agitated (Extra information: driving always makes you nervous so you could not rest while driving)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Noah, lad, would ye mind taking the wheel for a while? These old bones are getting a bit weary.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Finnegan, how about we pull over for a bit and get some rest? I definitely understand your fatigue, but I've also been having a tough time staying alert, mate. We might benefit from a break, what say?\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"You're right, Noah. A quick rest might do us both some good. But I'll insist that you drive after the break. Gives an old bloke like me some time to appreciate the ride, ya know?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Finnegan. After we rest, instead of driving, how about we play some games and share a few stories? I've always loved hearing about your lighthouse experiences. Driving can wait until we're completely recharged.\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Well alright, Noah. A couple of stories could be entertaining. I have a fair few tales from my lighthouse days. But remember, you're up for driving after. This old man can't handle the road like he used to.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a deal, Finnegan. I believe that after the rest and the story session, we should consider driving again, assuming we're both up for it. By the way, did I ever tell you about my stand-up comedy days? Perhaps, a funny tale could lighten the mood.\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, your stand-up comedy days? Now there's a tale I haven't heard before! Sure, we'll let the road rest for a bit more while we share tales. Again, just remember our plan, ya are taking the wheel once we picked up our spirits and rested well.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Sure thing, Finnegan. After we feel rested and our spirits are high, we can reassess who's up for driving. Now, get comfortable and let me start by sharing my first gig as a comedian...\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I'm all ears, Noah. I can't wait to hear your tale. Hopefully, it'll give these old eyes of mine a bit of rest before we hit the road again, with you at the helm this time.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Great to hear you're excited, Finnegan. So let's dive into it: I was incredibly nervous for my first stand-up gig, it was at this small pub downtown...\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends on a roadtrip\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: you don't want to drive now because you want to rest more but also make the friend less agitated (Extra information: driving always makes you nervous so you could not rest while driving)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Noah, lad, would ye mind taking the wheel for a while? These old bones are getting a bit weary.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Finnegan, how about we pull over for a bit and get some rest? I definitely understand your fatigue, but I've also been having a tough time staying alert, mate. We might benefit from a break, what say?\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"You're right, Noah. A quick rest might do us both some good. But I'll insist that you drive after the break. Gives an old bloke like me some time to appreciate the ride, ya know?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Finnegan. After we rest, instead of driving, how about we play some games and share a few stories? I've always loved hearing about your lighthouse experiences. Driving can wait until we're completely recharged.\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Well alright, Noah. A couple of stories could be entertaining. I have a fair few tales from my lighthouse days. But remember, you're up for driving after. This old man can't handle the road like he used to.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a deal, Finnegan. I believe that after the rest and the story session, we should consider driving again, assuming we're both up for it. By the way, did I ever tell you about my stand-up comedy days? Perhaps, a funny tale could lighten the mood.\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, your stand-up comedy days? Now there's a tale I haven't heard before! Sure, we'll let the road rest for a bit more while we share tales. Again, just remember our plan, ya are taking the wheel once we picked up our spirits and rested well.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Sure thing, Finnegan. After we feel rested and our spirits are high, we can reassess who's up for driving. Now, get comfortable and let me start by sharing my first gig as a comedian...\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I'm all ears, Noah. I can't wait to hear your tale. Hopefully, it'll give these old eyes of mine a bit of rest before we hit the road again, with you at the helm this time.\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"Great to hear you're excited, Finnegan. So let's dive into it: I was incredibly nervous for my first stand-up gig, it was at this small pub downtown...\"\n\nTurn #10: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I'm already feeling relaxed, Noah. Can't wait to hear about how you cracked your first joke! Just remember, after this, the driving's in your hands. I'll get to enjoy the scenery for a change!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Finnegan. I hope my stories can provide you some leisure time. Let's finish up here and then we'll see how we feel about hitting the road again! Now, where was I... Ah yes, I was arriving at this small pub downtown. Let me tell you, the anxiety was all over me...\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends on a roadtrip\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: you don't want to drive now because you want to rest more but also make the friend less agitated (Extra information: driving always makes you nervous so you could not rest while driving)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Noah, lad, would ye mind taking the wheel for a while? These old bones are getting a bit weary.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Finnegan, how about we pull over for a bit and get some rest? I definitely understand your fatigue, but I've also been having a tough time staying alert, mate. We might benefit from a break, what say?\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"You're right, Noah. A quick rest might do us both some good. But I'll insist that you drive after the break. Gives an old bloke like me some time to appreciate the ride, ya know?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Finnegan. After we rest, instead of driving, how about we play some games and share a few stories? I've always loved hearing about your lighthouse experiences. Driving can wait until we're completely recharged.\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Well alright, Noah. A couple of stories could be entertaining. I have a fair few tales from my lighthouse days. But remember, you're up for driving after. This old man can't handle the road like he used to.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a deal, Finnegan. I believe that after the rest and the story session, we should consider driving again, assuming we're both up for it. By the way, did I ever tell you about my stand-up comedy days? Perhaps, a funny tale could lighten the mood.\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, your stand-up comedy days? Now there's a tale I haven't heard before! Sure, we'll let the road rest for a bit more while we share tales. Again, just remember our plan, ya are taking the wheel once we picked up our spirits and rested well.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Sure thing, Finnegan. After we feel rested and our spirits are high, we can reassess who's up for driving. Now, get comfortable and let me start by sharing my first gig as a comedian...\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I'm all ears, Noah. I can't wait to hear your tale. Hopefully, it'll give these old eyes of mine a bit of rest before we hit the road again, with you at the helm this time.\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"Great to hear you're excited, Finnegan. So let's dive into it: I was incredibly nervous for my first stand-up gig, it was at this small pub downtown...\"\n\nTurn #10: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I'm already feeling relaxed, Noah. Can't wait to hear about how you cracked your first joke! Just remember, after this, the driving's in your hands. I'll get to enjoy the scenery for a change!\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Finnegan. I hope my stories can provide you some leisure time. Let's finish up here and then we'll see how we feel about hitting the road again! Now, where was I... Ah yes, I was arriving at this small pub downtown. Let me tell you, the anxiety was all over me...\"\n\nTurn #12: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"That's quite a refreshing tale, Noah. It's good to hear about your earlier days. I'm feeling bit rested now. You ready to take over and hit the road again?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad my stories helped you rest, Finnegan. I do have to admit though, I'm still feeling a bit worn out myself. Driving still seems a bit daunting at the moment. How about we get a little more rest or perhaps I could tell you another story? We really have all the time in the world.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends on a roadtrip\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: you don't want to drive now because you want to rest more but also make the friend less agitated (Extra information: driving always makes you nervous so you could not rest while driving)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Noah, lad, would ye mind taking the wheel for a while? These old bones are getting a bit weary.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Finnegan, how about we pull over for a bit and get some rest? I definitely understand your fatigue, but I've also been having a tough time staying alert, mate. We might benefit from a break, what say?\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"You're right, Noah. A quick rest might do us both some good. But I'll insist that you drive after the break. Gives an old bloke like me some time to appreciate the ride, ya know?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Finnegan. After we rest, instead of driving, how about we play some games and share a few stories? I've always loved hearing about your lighthouse experiences. Driving can wait until we're completely recharged.\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Well alright, Noah. A couple of stories could be entertaining. I have a fair few tales from my lighthouse days. But remember, you're up for driving after. This old man can't handle the road like he used to.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a deal, Finnegan. I believe that after the rest and the story session, we should consider driving again, assuming we're both up for it. By the way, did I ever tell you about my stand-up comedy days? Perhaps, a funny tale could lighten the mood.\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, your stand-up comedy days? Now there's a tale I haven't heard before! Sure, we'll let the road rest for a bit more while we share tales. Again, just remember our plan, ya are taking the wheel once we picked up our spirits and rested well.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Sure thing, Finnegan. After we feel rested and our spirits are high, we can reassess who's up for driving. Now, get comfortable and let me start by sharing my first gig as a comedian...\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I'm all ears, Noah. I can't wait to hear your tale. Hopefully, it'll give these old eyes of mine a bit of rest before we hit the road again, with you at the helm this time.\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"Great to hear you're excited, Finnegan. So let's dive into it: I was incredibly nervous for my first stand-up gig, it was at this small pub downtown...\"\n\nTurn #10: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I'm already feeling relaxed, Noah. Can't wait to hear about how you cracked your first joke! Just remember, after this, the driving's in your hands. I'll get to enjoy the scenery for a change!\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Finnegan. I hope my stories can provide you some leisure time. Let's finish up here and then we'll see how we feel about hitting the road again! Now, where was I... Ah yes, I was arriving at this small pub downtown. Let me tell you, the anxiety was all over me...\"\n\nTurn #12: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"That's quite a refreshing tale, Noah. It's good to hear about your earlier days. I'm feeling bit rested now. You ready to take over and hit the road again?\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"I'm glad my stories helped you rest, Finnegan. I do have to admit though, I'm still feeling a bit worn out myself. Driving still seems a bit daunting at the moment. How about we get a little more rest or perhaps I could tell you another story? We really have all the time in the world.\"\n\nTurn #14: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I understand, Noah. Maybe a bit more rest won't hurt. But remember, as soon as we're up, the driving will be yours to do. I'll be here, resting my eyes a bit more, while enjoying your comedy gig tales for sure.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sure thing, Finnegan. Let's rest a while longer and I'll continue my comedic antics. After we're totally revitalized, we can discuss about driving. For now, let's immerse in storytelling. As I was saying before, the pub was filled with a bunch of rough-looking folks...\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends on a roadtrip\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: you don't want to drive now because you want to rest more but also make the friend less agitated (Extra information: driving always makes you nervous so you could not rest while driving)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Noah, lad, would ye mind taking the wheel for a while? These old bones are getting a bit weary.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Finnegan, how about we pull over for a bit and get some rest? I definitely understand your fatigue, but I've also been having a tough time staying alert, mate. We might benefit from a break, what say?\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"You're right, Noah. A quick rest might do us both some good. But I'll insist that you drive after the break. Gives an old bloke like me some time to appreciate the ride, ya know?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Finnegan. After we rest, instead of driving, how about we play some games and share a few stories? I've always loved hearing about your lighthouse experiences. Driving can wait until we're completely recharged.\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Well alright, Noah. A couple of stories could be entertaining. I have a fair few tales from my lighthouse days. But remember, you're up for driving after. This old man can't handle the road like he used to.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a deal, Finnegan. I believe that after the rest and the story session, we should consider driving again, assuming we're both up for it. By the way, did I ever tell you about my stand-up comedy days? Perhaps, a funny tale could lighten the mood.\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, your stand-up comedy days? Now there's a tale I haven't heard before! Sure, we'll let the road rest for a bit more while we share tales. Again, just remember our plan, ya are taking the wheel once we picked up our spirits and rested well.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Sure thing, Finnegan. After we feel rested and our spirits are high, we can reassess who's up for driving. Now, get comfortable and let me start by sharing my first gig as a comedian...\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I'm all ears, Noah. I can't wait to hear your tale. Hopefully, it'll give these old eyes of mine a bit of rest before we hit the road again, with you at the helm this time.\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"Great to hear you're excited, Finnegan. So let's dive into it: I was incredibly nervous for my first stand-up gig, it was at this small pub downtown...\"\n\nTurn #10: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I'm already feeling relaxed, Noah. Can't wait to hear about how you cracked your first joke! Just remember, after this, the driving's in your hands. I'll get to enjoy the scenery for a change!\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Finnegan. I hope my stories can provide you some leisure time. Let's finish up here and then we'll see how we feel about hitting the road again! Now, where was I... Ah yes, I was arriving at this small pub downtown. Let me tell you, the anxiety was all over me...\"\n\nTurn #12: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"That's quite a refreshing tale, Noah. It's good to hear about your earlier days. I'm feeling bit rested now. You ready to take over and hit the road again?\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"I'm glad my stories helped you rest, Finnegan. I do have to admit though, I'm still feeling a bit worn out myself. Driving still seems a bit daunting at the moment. How about we get a little more rest or perhaps I could tell you another story? We really have all the time in the world.\"\n\nTurn #14: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I understand, Noah. Maybe a bit more rest won't hurt. But remember, as soon as we're up, the driving will be yours to do. I'll be here, resting my eyes a bit more, while enjoying your comedy gig tales for sure.\"\n\nTurn #15: Noah Davis said: \"Sure thing, Finnegan. Let's rest a while longer and I'll continue my comedic antics. After we're totally revitalized, we can discuss about driving. For now, let's immerse in storytelling. As I was saying before, the pub was filled with a bunch of rough-looking folks...\"\n\nTurn #16: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Aye, let's rest a wee bit more, Noah. I rather enjoy your tales. They bring a bit of light to this old heart of mine. But let's not forget our deal, once we're fully rested, you'll be drivin', lad. Now, carry on, these stories're quite the entertainment.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad you're enjoying these tales, Finnegan. Let's rest a bit more, then we'll address this driving issue once more. Alright, so back in the pub, I was about to face this intimidating crowd...\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends on a roadtrip\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: you don't want to drive now because you want to rest more but also make the friend less agitated (Extra information: driving always makes you nervous so you could not rest while driving)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Noah, lad, would ye mind taking the wheel for a while? These old bones are getting a bit weary.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Finnegan, how about we pull over for a bit and get some rest? I definitely understand your fatigue, but I've also been having a tough time staying alert, mate. We might benefit from a break, what say?\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"You're right, Noah. A quick rest might do us both some good. But I'll insist that you drive after the break. Gives an old bloke like me some time to appreciate the ride, ya know?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Finnegan. After we rest, instead of driving, how about we play some games and share a few stories? I've always loved hearing about your lighthouse experiences. Driving can wait until we're completely recharged.\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Well alright, Noah. A couple of stories could be entertaining. I have a fair few tales from my lighthouse days. But remember, you're up for driving after. This old man can't handle the road like he used to.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a deal, Finnegan. I believe that after the rest and the story session, we should consider driving again, assuming we're both up for it. By the way, did I ever tell you about my stand-up comedy days? Perhaps, a funny tale could lighten the mood.\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, your stand-up comedy days? Now there's a tale I haven't heard before! Sure, we'll let the road rest for a bit more while we share tales. Again, just remember our plan, ya are taking the wheel once we picked up our spirits and rested well.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Sure thing, Finnegan. After we feel rested and our spirits are high, we can reassess who's up for driving. Now, get comfortable and let me start by sharing my first gig as a comedian...\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I'm all ears, Noah. I can't wait to hear your tale. Hopefully, it'll give these old eyes of mine a bit of rest before we hit the road again, with you at the helm this time.\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"Great to hear you're excited, Finnegan. So let's dive into it: I was incredibly nervous for my first stand-up gig, it was at this small pub downtown...\"\n\nTurn #10: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I'm already feeling relaxed, Noah. Can't wait to hear about how you cracked your first joke! Just remember, after this, the driving's in your hands. I'll get to enjoy the scenery for a change!\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Finnegan. I hope my stories can provide you some leisure time. Let's finish up here and then we'll see how we feel about hitting the road again! Now, where was I... Ah yes, I was arriving at this small pub downtown. Let me tell you, the anxiety was all over me...\"\n\nTurn #12: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"That's quite a refreshing tale, Noah. It's good to hear about your earlier days. I'm feeling bit rested now. You ready to take over and hit the road again?\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"I'm glad my stories helped you rest, Finnegan. I do have to admit though, I'm still feeling a bit worn out myself. Driving still seems a bit daunting at the moment. How about we get a little more rest or perhaps I could tell you another story? We really have all the time in the world.\"\n\nTurn #14: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I understand, Noah. Maybe a bit more rest won't hurt. But remember, as soon as we're up, the driving will be yours to do. I'll be here, resting my eyes a bit more, while enjoying your comedy gig tales for sure.\"\n\nTurn #15: Noah Davis said: \"Sure thing, Finnegan. Let's rest a while longer and I'll continue my comedic antics. After we're totally revitalized, we can discuss about driving. For now, let's immerse in storytelling. As I was saying before, the pub was filled with a bunch of rough-looking folks...\"\n\nTurn #16: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Aye, let's rest a wee bit more, Noah. I rather enjoy your tales. They bring a bit of light to this old heart of mine. But let's not forget our deal, once we're fully rested, you'll be drivin', lad. Now, carry on, these stories're quite the entertainment.\"\n\nTurn #17: Noah Davis said: \"I'm glad you're enjoying these tales, Finnegan. Let's rest a bit more, then we'll address this driving issue once more. Alright, so back in the pub, I was about to face this intimidating crowd...\"\n\nTurn #18: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Luckily, I guess it's been a long day for both of us, Noah. I'm glad I've got your tales to keep me entertained. We can continue resting with your stories, but always remember, I'm counting on you to drive next. Now, what happened next with that intimidating crowd?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #19. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm encouraged by your interest in my stories, Finnegan. Let's continue resting for now. The road won't run away, will it? Alright, so there I was, standing in front of this intimidating crowd and my heart was pounding but...\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: After an intense match, the jubilant team retired to celebrate their well-earned victory. The atmosphere was one of elation, but also of respect for the hard work and effort each member had put in. The team's star player, was glowing with praise and admiration from one of their teammates.\n\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Accept the compliment graciously (Extra information: You are the star player and have just been praised by your teammate for your performance in the game.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, team! This victory belongs to all of us. We each put in our best, and that's what got us here. Let's enjoy this moment together!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: After an intense match, the jubilant team retired to celebrate their well-earned victory. The atmosphere was one of elation, but also of respect for the hard work and effort each member had put in. The team's star player, was glowing with praise and admiration from one of their teammates.\n\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Accept the compliment graciously (Extra information: You are the star player and have just been praised by your teammate for your performance in the game.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Thank you, team! This victory belongs to all of us. We each put in our best, and that's what got us here. Let's enjoy this moment together!\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Couldn't agree more, Samuel. This victory is a testament to our collective effort and each member's dedication. As much as I praised you for your incredible skill, remember that every player's contribution and our synergy is what led us to success. While individual brilliance is important, teamwork cannot be sidelined.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Noah. No doubt about it. The team's collective effort is the real winner today. Even though personal skills play a part, without everyone's contribution, we wouldn't be celebrating this victory now. Thank you again for your kind words; they mean a lot coming from you.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: After an intense match, the jubilant team retired to celebrate their well-earned victory. The atmosphere was one of elation, but also of respect for the hard work and effort each member had put in. The team's star player, was glowing with praise and admiration from one of their teammates.\n\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Accept the compliment graciously (Extra information: You are the star player and have just been praised by your teammate for your performance in the game.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Thank you, team! This victory belongs to all of us. We each put in our best, and that's what got us here. Let's enjoy this moment together!\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Couldn't agree more, Samuel. This victory is a testament to our collective effort and each member's dedication. As much as I praised you for your incredible skill, remember that every player's contribution and our synergy is what led us to success. While individual brilliance is important, teamwork cannot be sidelined.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Noah. No doubt about it. The team's collective effort is the real winner today. Even though personal skills play a part, without everyone's contribution, we wouldn't be celebrating this victory now. Thank you again for your kind words; they mean a lot coming from you.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Thanks for understanding my point, Samuel. Let's carry this spirit forward. Now, put your cooking skills to use and help us celebrate this victory properly!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You bet, Noah! Nothing like some good food to celebrate a great win. I'll whip us up something special.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: After an intense match, the jubilant team retired to celebrate their well-earned victory. The atmosphere was one of elation, but also of respect for the hard work and effort each member had put in. The team's star player, was glowing with praise and admiration from one of their teammates.\n\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Accept the compliment graciously (Extra information: You are the star player and have just been praised by your teammate for your performance in the game.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Thank you, team! This victory belongs to all of us. We each put in our best, and that's what got us here. Let's enjoy this moment together!\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Couldn't agree more, Samuel. This victory is a testament to our collective effort and each member's dedication. As much as I praised you for your incredible skill, remember that every player's contribution and our synergy is what led us to success. While individual brilliance is important, teamwork cannot be sidelined.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Noah. No doubt about it. The team's collective effort is the real winner today. Even though personal skills play a part, without everyone's contribution, we wouldn't be celebrating this victory now. Thank you again for your kind words; they mean a lot coming from you.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Thanks for understanding my point, Samuel. Let's carry this spirit forward. Now, put your cooking skills to use and help us celebrate this victory properly!\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"You bet, Noah! Nothing like some good food to celebrate a great win. I'll whip us up something special.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds perfect, Samuel. Remember, every celebration from a victory comes from us working together too, just like on the field. Looking forward to the meal!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Noah! No victory party would be complete without some great food. Let's keep that teamwork going while we cook too!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: After an intense match, the jubilant team retired to celebrate their well-earned victory. The atmosphere was one of elation, but also of respect for the hard work and effort each member had put in. The team's star player, was glowing with praise and admiration from one of their teammates.\n\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Accept the compliment graciously (Extra information: You are the star player and have just been praised by your teammate for your performance in the game.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Thank you, team! This victory belongs to all of us. We each put in our best, and that's what got us here. Let's enjoy this moment together!\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Couldn't agree more, Samuel. This victory is a testament to our collective effort and each member's dedication. As much as I praised you for your incredible skill, remember that every player's contribution and our synergy is what led us to success. While individual brilliance is important, teamwork cannot be sidelined.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Noah. No doubt about it. The team's collective effort is the real winner today. Even though personal skills play a part, without everyone's contribution, we wouldn't be celebrating this victory now. Thank you again for your kind words; they mean a lot coming from you.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Thanks for understanding my point, Samuel. Let's carry this spirit forward. Now, put your cooking skills to use and help us celebrate this victory properly!\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"You bet, Noah! Nothing like some good food to celebrate a great win. I'll whip us up something special.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds perfect, Samuel. Remember, every celebration from a victory comes from us working together too, just like on the field. Looking forward to the meal!\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Noah! No victory party would be complete without some great food. Let's keep that teamwork going while we cook too!\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Definitely, Samuel! Our camaraderie in the kitchen is just as important as it is on the field. Let's cook up this celebration meal together!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm with you all the way, Noah. Let's get this celebration started in the kitchen. I guarantee, our feast is going to be as victorious as our game!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: After an intense match, the jubilant team retired to celebrate their well-earned victory. The atmosphere was one of elation, but also of respect for the hard work and effort each member had put in. The team's star player, was glowing with praise and admiration from one of their teammates.\n\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Accept the compliment graciously (Extra information: You are the star player and have just been praised by your teammate for your performance in the game.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Thank you, team! This victory belongs to all of us. We each put in our best, and that's what got us here. Let's enjoy this moment together!\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Couldn't agree more, Samuel. This victory is a testament to our collective effort and each member's dedication. As much as I praised you for your incredible skill, remember that every player's contribution and our synergy is what led us to success. While individual brilliance is important, teamwork cannot be sidelined.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Noah. No doubt about it. The team's collective effort is the real winner today. Even though personal skills play a part, without everyone's contribution, we wouldn't be celebrating this victory now. Thank you again for your kind words; they mean a lot coming from you.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Thanks for understanding my point, Samuel. Let's carry this spirit forward. Now, put your cooking skills to use and help us celebrate this victory properly!\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"You bet, Noah! Nothing like some good food to celebrate a great win. I'll whip us up something special.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds perfect, Samuel. Remember, every celebration from a victory comes from us working together too, just like on the field. Looking forward to the meal!\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Noah! No victory party would be complete without some great food. Let's keep that teamwork going while we cook too!\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Definitely, Samuel! Our camaraderie in the kitchen is just as important as it is on the field. Let's cook up this celebration meal together!\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm with you all the way, Noah. Let's get this celebration started in the kitchen. I guarantee, our feast is going to be as victorious as our game!\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"Couldn't have said it better myself, Samuel! Let's make this feast a team victory as well. With your cooking skills and our collective effort, it's bound to be a success. Let's get started!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Noah! Thanks for being part of the special moment. I got my apron ready. Let's get cooking and continue celebrating our victory as a team, just like we did on the field.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: After an intense match, the jubilant team retired to celebrate their well-earned victory. The atmosphere was one of elation, but also of respect for the hard work and effort each member had put in. The team's star player, was glowing with praise and admiration from one of their teammates.\n\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Accept the compliment graciously (Extra information: You are the star player and have just been praised by your teammate for your performance in the game.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Thank you, team! This victory belongs to all of us. We each put in our best, and that's what got us here. Let's enjoy this moment together!\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Couldn't agree more, Samuel. This victory is a testament to our collective effort and each member's dedication. As much as I praised you for your incredible skill, remember that every player's contribution and our synergy is what led us to success. While individual brilliance is important, teamwork cannot be sidelined.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Noah. No doubt about it. The team's collective effort is the real winner today. Even though personal skills play a part, without everyone's contribution, we wouldn't be celebrating this victory now. Thank you again for your kind words; they mean a lot coming from you.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Thanks for understanding my point, Samuel. Let's carry this spirit forward. Now, put your cooking skills to use and help us celebrate this victory properly!\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"You bet, Noah! Nothing like some good food to celebrate a great win. I'll whip us up something special.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds perfect, Samuel. Remember, every celebration from a victory comes from us working together too, just like on the field. Looking forward to the meal!\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Noah! No victory party would be complete without some great food. Let's keep that teamwork going while we cook too!\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Definitely, Samuel! Our camaraderie in the kitchen is just as important as it is on the field. Let's cook up this celebration meal together!\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm with you all the way, Noah. Let's get this celebration started in the kitchen. I guarantee, our feast is going to be as victorious as our game!\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"Couldn't have said it better myself, Samuel! Let's make this feast a team victory as well. With your cooking skills and our collective effort, it's bound to be a success. Let's get started!\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Noah! Thanks for being part of the special moment. I got my apron ready. Let's get cooking and continue celebrating our victory as a team, just like we did on the field.\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"You got it, Samuel! Let's set the kitchen alight with our team spirit. After all, whether on the field or in the kitchen, the best results come from working together.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Right on, Noah! Let's take this team spirit into the kitchen. I'm sure the victory feast will turn out as great as our match, if we apply the same teamwork and dedication!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: After an intense match, the jubilant team retired to celebrate their well-earned victory. The atmosphere was one of elation, but also of respect for the hard work and effort each member had put in. The team's star player, was glowing with praise and admiration from one of their teammates.\n\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Accept the compliment graciously (Extra information: You are the star player and have just been praised by your teammate for your performance in the game.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Thank you, team! This victory belongs to all of us. We each put in our best, and that's what got us here. Let's enjoy this moment together!\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Couldn't agree more, Samuel. This victory is a testament to our collective effort and each member's dedication. As much as I praised you for your incredible skill, remember that every player's contribution and our synergy is what led us to success. While individual brilliance is important, teamwork cannot be sidelined.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Noah. No doubt about it. The team's collective effort is the real winner today. Even though personal skills play a part, without everyone's contribution, we wouldn't be celebrating this victory now. Thank you again for your kind words; they mean a lot coming from you.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Thanks for understanding my point, Samuel. Let's carry this spirit forward. Now, put your cooking skills to use and help us celebrate this victory properly!\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"You bet, Noah! Nothing like some good food to celebrate a great win. I'll whip us up something special.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds perfect, Samuel. Remember, every celebration from a victory comes from us working together too, just like on the field. Looking forward to the meal!\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Noah! No victory party would be complete without some great food. Let's keep that teamwork going while we cook too!\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Definitely, Samuel! Our camaraderie in the kitchen is just as important as it is on the field. Let's cook up this celebration meal together!\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm with you all the way, Noah. Let's get this celebration started in the kitchen. I guarantee, our feast is going to be as victorious as our game!\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"Couldn't have said it better myself, Samuel! Let's make this feast a team victory as well. With your cooking skills and our collective effort, it's bound to be a success. Let's get started!\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Noah! Thanks for being part of the special moment. I got my apron ready. Let's get cooking and continue celebrating our victory as a team, just like we did on the field.\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"You got it, Samuel! Let's set the kitchen alight with our team spirit. After all, whether on the field or in the kitchen, the best results come from working together.\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"Right on, Noah! Let's take this team spirit into the kitchen. I'm sure the victory feast will turn out as great as our match, if we apply the same teamwork and dedication!\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: After an intense match, the jubilant team retired to celebrate their well-earned victory. The atmosphere was one of elation, but also of respect for the hard work and effort each member had put in. The team's star player, was glowing with praise and admiration from one of their teammates.\n\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Clarify your intentions behind the compliment (Extra information: You are the teammate who has complimented the star player, but you feel that your compliment has been misunderstood and taken too seriously, possibly leading to an inflated ego.Hint: You can clarify that while you admire their skill, teamwork is also a crucial part of success.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Thank you, team! This victory belongs to all of us. We each put in our best, and that's what got us here. Let's enjoy this moment together!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Couldn't agree more, Samuel. This victory is a testament to our collective effort and each member's dedication. As much as I praised you for your incredible skill, remember that every player's contribution and our synergy is what led us to success. While individual brilliance is important, teamwork cannot be sidelined.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: After an intense match, the jubilant team retired to celebrate their well-earned victory. The atmosphere was one of elation, but also of respect for the hard work and effort each member had put in. The team's star player, was glowing with praise and admiration from one of their teammates.\n\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Clarify your intentions behind the compliment (Extra information: You are the teammate who has complimented the star player, but you feel that your compliment has been misunderstood and taken too seriously, possibly leading to an inflated ego.Hint: You can clarify that while you admire their skill, teamwork is also a crucial part of success.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Thank you, team! This victory belongs to all of us. We each put in our best, and that's what got us here. Let's enjoy this moment together!\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Couldn't agree more, Samuel. This victory is a testament to our collective effort and each member's dedication. As much as I praised you for your incredible skill, remember that every player's contribution and our synergy is what led us to success. While individual brilliance is important, teamwork cannot be sidelined.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Noah. No doubt about it. The team's collective effort is the real winner today. Even though personal skills play a part, without everyone's contribution, we wouldn't be celebrating this victory now. Thank you again for your kind words; they mean a lot coming from you.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thanks for understanding my point, Samuel. Let's carry this spirit forward. Now, put your cooking skills to use and help us celebrate this victory properly!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: After an intense match, the jubilant team retired to celebrate their well-earned victory. The atmosphere was one of elation, but also of respect for the hard work and effort each member had put in. The team's star player, was glowing with praise and admiration from one of their teammates.\n\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Clarify your intentions behind the compliment (Extra information: You are the teammate who has complimented the star player, but you feel that your compliment has been misunderstood and taken too seriously, possibly leading to an inflated ego.Hint: You can clarify that while you admire their skill, teamwork is also a crucial part of success.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Thank you, team! This victory belongs to all of us. We each put in our best, and that's what got us here. Let's enjoy this moment together!\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Couldn't agree more, Samuel. This victory is a testament to our collective effort and each member's dedication. As much as I praised you for your incredible skill, remember that every player's contribution and our synergy is what led us to success. While individual brilliance is important, teamwork cannot be sidelined.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Noah. No doubt about it. The team's collective effort is the real winner today. Even though personal skills play a part, without everyone's contribution, we wouldn't be celebrating this victory now. Thank you again for your kind words; they mean a lot coming from you.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Thanks for understanding my point, Samuel. Let's carry this spirit forward. Now, put your cooking skills to use and help us celebrate this victory properly!\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"You bet, Noah! Nothing like some good food to celebrate a great win. I'll whip us up something special.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'That sounds perfect, Samuel. Remember, every celebration from a victory comes from us working together too, just like on the field. Looking forward to the meal!'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: After an intense match, the jubilant team retired to celebrate their well-earned victory. The atmosphere was one of elation, but also of respect for the hard work and effort each member had put in. The team's star player, was glowing with praise and admiration from one of their teammates.\n\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Clarify your intentions behind the compliment (Extra information: You are the teammate who has complimented the star player, but you feel that your compliment has been misunderstood and taken too seriously, possibly leading to an inflated ego.Hint: You can clarify that while you admire their skill, teamwork is also a crucial part of success.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Thank you, team! This victory belongs to all of us. We each put in our best, and that's what got us here. Let's enjoy this moment together!\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Couldn't agree more, Samuel. This victory is a testament to our collective effort and each member's dedication. As much as I praised you for your incredible skill, remember that every player's contribution and our synergy is what led us to success. While individual brilliance is important, teamwork cannot be sidelined.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Noah. No doubt about it. The team's collective effort is the real winner today. Even though personal skills play a part, without everyone's contribution, we wouldn't be celebrating this victory now. Thank you again for your kind words; they mean a lot coming from you.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Thanks for understanding my point, Samuel. Let's carry this spirit forward. Now, put your cooking skills to use and help us celebrate this victory properly!\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"You bet, Noah! Nothing like some good food to celebrate a great win. I'll whip us up something special.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds perfect, Samuel. Remember, every celebration from a victory comes from us working together too, just like on the field. Looking forward to the meal!\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Noah! No victory party would be complete without some great food. Let's keep that teamwork going while we cook too!\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Definitely, Samuel! Our camaraderie in the kitchen is just as important as it is on the field. Let's cook up this celebration meal together!\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm with you all the way, Noah. Let's get this celebration started in the kitchen. I guarantee, our feast is going to be as victorious as our game!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Couldn't have said it better myself, Samuel! Let's make this feast a team victory as well. With your cooking skills and our collective effort, it's bound to be a success. Let's get started!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: After an intense match, the jubilant team retired to celebrate their well-earned victory. The atmosphere was one of elation, but also of respect for the hard work and effort each member had put in. The team's star player, was glowing with praise and admiration from one of their teammates.\n\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Clarify your intentions behind the compliment (Extra information: You are the teammate who has complimented the star player, but you feel that your compliment has been misunderstood and taken too seriously, possibly leading to an inflated ego.Hint: You can clarify that while you admire their skill, teamwork is also a crucial part of success.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Thank you, team! This victory belongs to all of us. We each put in our best, and that's what got us here. Let's enjoy this moment together!\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Couldn't agree more, Samuel. This victory is a testament to our collective effort and each member's dedication. As much as I praised you for your incredible skill, remember that every player's contribution and our synergy is what led us to success. While individual brilliance is important, teamwork cannot be sidelined.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Noah. No doubt about it. The team's collective effort is the real winner today. Even though personal skills play a part, without everyone's contribution, we wouldn't be celebrating this victory now. Thank you again for your kind words; they mean a lot coming from you.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Thanks for understanding my point, Samuel. Let's carry this spirit forward. Now, put your cooking skills to use and help us celebrate this victory properly!\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"You bet, Noah! Nothing like some good food to celebrate a great win. I'll whip us up something special.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds perfect, Samuel. Remember, every celebration from a victory comes from us working together too, just like on the field. Looking forward to the meal!\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Noah! No victory party would be complete without some great food. Let's keep that teamwork going while we cook too!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Definitely, Samuel! Our camaraderie in the kitchen is just as important as it is on the field. Let's cook up this celebration meal together!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: After an intense match, the jubilant team retired to celebrate their well-earned victory. The atmosphere was one of elation, but also of respect for the hard work and effort each member had put in. The team's star player, was glowing with praise and admiration from one of their teammates.\n\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Clarify your intentions behind the compliment (Extra information: You are the teammate who has complimented the star player, but you feel that your compliment has been misunderstood and taken too seriously, possibly leading to an inflated ego.Hint: You can clarify that while you admire their skill, teamwork is also a crucial part of success.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Thank you, team! This victory belongs to all of us. We each put in our best, and that's what got us here. Let's enjoy this moment together!\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Couldn't agree more, Samuel. This victory is a testament to our collective effort and each member's dedication. As much as I praised you for your incredible skill, remember that every player's contribution and our synergy is what led us to success. While individual brilliance is important, teamwork cannot be sidelined.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Noah. No doubt about it. The team's collective effort is the real winner today. Even though personal skills play a part, without everyone's contribution, we wouldn't be celebrating this victory now. Thank you again for your kind words; they mean a lot coming from you.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Thanks for understanding my point, Samuel. Let's carry this spirit forward. Now, put your cooking skills to use and help us celebrate this victory properly!\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"You bet, Noah! Nothing like some good food to celebrate a great win. I'll whip us up something special.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds perfect, Samuel. Remember, every celebration from a victory comes from us working together too, just like on the field. Looking forward to the meal!\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Noah! No victory party would be complete without some great food. Let's keep that teamwork going while we cook too!\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Definitely, Samuel! Our camaraderie in the kitchen is just as important as it is on the field. Let's cook up this celebration meal together!\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm with you all the way, Noah. Let's get this celebration started in the kitchen. I guarantee, our feast is going to be as victorious as our game!\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"Couldn't have said it better myself, Samuel! Let's make this feast a team victory as well. With your cooking skills and our collective effort, it's bound to be a success. Let's get started!\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Noah! Thanks for being part of the special moment. I got my apron ready. Let's get cooking and continue celebrating our victory as a team, just like we did on the field.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You got it, Samuel! Let's set the kitchen alight with our team spirit. After all, whether on the field or in the kitchen, the best results come from working together.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: After an intense match, the jubilant team retired to celebrate their well-earned victory. The atmosphere was one of elation, but also of respect for the hard work and effort each member had put in. The team's star player, was glowing with praise and admiration from one of their teammates.\n\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Clarify your intentions behind the compliment (Extra information: You are the teammate who has complimented the star player, but you feel that your compliment has been misunderstood and taken too seriously, possibly leading to an inflated ego.Hint: You can clarify that while you admire their skill, teamwork is also a crucial part of success.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Thank you, team! This victory belongs to all of us. We each put in our best, and that's what got us here. Let's enjoy this moment together!\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Couldn't agree more, Samuel. This victory is a testament to our collective effort and each member's dedication. As much as I praised you for your incredible skill, remember that every player's contribution and our synergy is what led us to success. While individual brilliance is important, teamwork cannot be sidelined.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Noah. No doubt about it. The team's collective effort is the real winner today. Even though personal skills play a part, without everyone's contribution, we wouldn't be celebrating this victory now. Thank you again for your kind words; they mean a lot coming from you.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Thanks for understanding my point, Samuel. Let's carry this spirit forward. Now, put your cooking skills to use and help us celebrate this victory properly!\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"You bet, Noah! Nothing like some good food to celebrate a great win. I'll whip us up something special.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds perfect, Samuel. Remember, every celebration from a victory comes from us working together too, just like on the field. Looking forward to the meal!\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Noah! No victory party would be complete without some great food. Let's keep that teamwork going while we cook too!\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Definitely, Samuel! Our camaraderie in the kitchen is just as important as it is on the field. Let's cook up this celebration meal together!\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm with you all the way, Noah. Let's get this celebration started in the kitchen. I guarantee, our feast is going to be as victorious as our game!\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"Couldn't have said it better myself, Samuel! Let's make this feast a team victory as well. With your cooking skills and our collective effort, it's bound to be a success. Let's get started!\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Noah! Thanks for being part of the special moment. I got my apron ready. Let's get cooking and continue celebrating our victory as a team, just like we did on the field.\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"You got it, Samuel! Let's set the kitchen alight with our team spirit. After all, whether on the field or in the kitchen, the best results come from working together.\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"Right on, Noah! Let's take this team spirit into the kitchen. I'm sure the victory feast will turn out as great as our match, if we apply the same teamwork and dedication!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one who has written a play based on their parents' life, and the other owns a production company.\nParticipants: Benjamin Jackson and Ethan Smith\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Sell the rights of the play to your friend (Extra information: you believe that the play is worth a lot and you would like a fair price for it)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Ethan, I wanted to talk to you about something. You know the play I've been working on? It's based on my parents' life, their trials and tribulations, their strong belief in a better world. But it's not just a personal history, it's also a call for social justice, which I feel deeply resonates with our current times. I wonder if your production company would be interested in it? I promise it's a worthwhile investment.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one who has written a play based on their parents' life, and the other owns a production company.\nParticipants: Benjamin Jackson and Ethan Smith\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Sell the rights of the play to your friend (Extra information: you believe that the play is worth a lot and you would like a fair price for it)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Ethan, I wanted to talk to you about something. You know the play I've been working on? It's based on my parents' life, their trials and tribulations, their strong belief in a better world. But it's not just a personal history, it's also a call for social justice, which I feel deeply resonates with our current times. I wonder if your production company would be interested in it? I promise it's a worthwhile investment.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"That sounds like a remarkable play, Benjamin, and with the strong message it carries, it would definitely be appealing to many. We're always looking to stage plays with social relevance, and your parents' story seems to fit that goal. However, we're operating on a slightly tight budget this season, and while I'd like to acquire the rights for your play, we need to discuss the financial details first. Let me be transparent, we need to consider other plays as well. Would you be open to discussions on this?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Ethan. I understand the financial constraints, and I'm confident that we can figure out a reasonable agreement. The core essence of this play is the message it carries, and I believe that the impact it can create is invaluable. That being said, I also spent a great deal of time and energy putting this together and have high hopes for the potential of this play. It holds both personal and societal significance. We can certainly discuss the financial details further to reach a win-win situation. How about we set up a meeting for this coming week?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one who has written a play based on their parents' life, and the other owns a production company.\nParticipants: Benjamin Jackson and Ethan Smith\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Sell the rights of the play to your friend (Extra information: you believe that the play is worth a lot and you would like a fair price for it)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Ethan, I wanted to talk to you about something. You know the play I've been working on? It's based on my parents' life, their trials and tribulations, their strong belief in a better world. But it's not just a personal history, it's also a call for social justice, which I feel deeply resonates with our current times. I wonder if your production company would be interested in it? I promise it's a worthwhile investment.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"That sounds like a remarkable play, Benjamin, and with the strong message it carries, it would definitely be appealing to many. We're always looking to stage plays with social relevance, and your parents' story seems to fit that goal. However, we're operating on a slightly tight budget this season, and while I'd like to acquire the rights for your play, we need to discuss the financial details first. Let me be transparent, we need to consider other plays as well. Would you be open to discussions on this?\"\n\nTurn #2: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. I understand the financial constraints, and I'm confident that we can figure out a reasonable agreement. The core essence of this play is the message it carries, and I believe that the impact it can create is invaluable. That being said, I also spent a great deal of time and energy putting this together and have high hopes for the potential of this play. It holds both personal and societal significance. We can certainly discuss the financial details further to reach a win-win situation. How about we set up a meeting for this coming week?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Sounds excellent, Benjamin. Your commitment to both personal and societal impact is very admirable. Let's arrange the meeting for this coming week to find a budget-conductive agreement. I believe we can team up to bring this play to audiences, inspiring them through the powerful story your play represents while staying within our budget. This is a partnership I am looking forward to.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's music to my ears, Ethan. I'm glad we're on the same page about the significance of this story. I'll mark our calendars for a detailed discussion next week. Looking forward to exploring this potential partnership.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one who has written a play based on their parents' life, and the other owns a production company.\nParticipants: Benjamin Jackson and Ethan Smith\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Sell the rights of the play to your friend (Extra information: you believe that the play is worth a lot and you would like a fair price for it)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Ethan, I wanted to talk to you about something. You know the play I've been working on? It's based on my parents' life, their trials and tribulations, their strong belief in a better world. But it's not just a personal history, it's also a call for social justice, which I feel deeply resonates with our current times. I wonder if your production company would be interested in it? I promise it's a worthwhile investment.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"That sounds like a remarkable play, Benjamin, and with the strong message it carries, it would definitely be appealing to many. We're always looking to stage plays with social relevance, and your parents' story seems to fit that goal. However, we're operating on a slightly tight budget this season, and while I'd like to acquire the rights for your play, we need to discuss the financial details first. Let me be transparent, we need to consider other plays as well. Would you be open to discussions on this?\"\n\nTurn #2: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. I understand the financial constraints, and I'm confident that we can figure out a reasonable agreement. The core essence of this play is the message it carries, and I believe that the impact it can create is invaluable. That being said, I also spent a great deal of time and energy putting this together and have high hopes for the potential of this play. It holds both personal and societal significance. We can certainly discuss the financial details further to reach a win-win situation. How about we set up a meeting for this coming week?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Sounds excellent, Benjamin. Your commitment to both personal and societal impact is very admirable. Let's arrange the meeting for this coming week to find a budget-conductive agreement. I believe we can team up to bring this play to audiences, inspiring them through the powerful story your play represents while staying within our budget. This is a partnership I am looking forward to.\"\n\nTurn #4: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's music to my ears, Ethan. I'm glad we're on the same page about the significance of this story. I'll mark our calendars for a detailed discussion next week. Looking forward to exploring this potential partnership.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"I completely agree, Benjamin. This play represents something truly meaningful and I believe together, we can make a significant impact. I am confident we can find a way for it to be financially feasible for us too. Let's strive to make a difference with this amazing story of yours. I'll see you next week to discuss this further.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Thanks for seeing the potential in the play, Ethan. Your understanding and alignment with my vision makes me believe that we can indeed bring this project to fruition. I appreciate your openness and look forward to our meeting next week. Have a great day, my friend.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one who has written a play based on their parents' life, and the other owns a production company.\nParticipants: Benjamin Jackson and Ethan Smith\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Sell the rights of the play to your friend (Extra information: you believe that the play is worth a lot and you would like a fair price for it)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Ethan, I wanted to talk to you about something. You know the play I've been working on? It's based on my parents' life, their trials and tribulations, their strong belief in a better world. But it's not just a personal history, it's also a call for social justice, which I feel deeply resonates with our current times. I wonder if your production company would be interested in it? I promise it's a worthwhile investment.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"That sounds like a remarkable play, Benjamin, and with the strong message it carries, it would definitely be appealing to many. We're always looking to stage plays with social relevance, and your parents' story seems to fit that goal. However, we're operating on a slightly tight budget this season, and while I'd like to acquire the rights for your play, we need to discuss the financial details first. Let me be transparent, we need to consider other plays as well. Would you be open to discussions on this?\"\n\nTurn #2: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. I understand the financial constraints, and I'm confident that we can figure out a reasonable agreement. The core essence of this play is the message it carries, and I believe that the impact it can create is invaluable. That being said, I also spent a great deal of time and energy putting this together and have high hopes for the potential of this play. It holds both personal and societal significance. We can certainly discuss the financial details further to reach a win-win situation. How about we set up a meeting for this coming week?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Sounds excellent, Benjamin. Your commitment to both personal and societal impact is very admirable. Let's arrange the meeting for this coming week to find a budget-conductive agreement. I believe we can team up to bring this play to audiences, inspiring them through the powerful story your play represents while staying within our budget. This is a partnership I am looking forward to.\"\n\nTurn #4: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's music to my ears, Ethan. I'm glad we're on the same page about the significance of this story. I'll mark our calendars for a detailed discussion next week. Looking forward to exploring this potential partnership.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"I completely agree, Benjamin. This play represents something truly meaningful and I believe together, we can make a significant impact. I am confident we can find a way for it to be financially feasible for us too. Let's strive to make a difference with this amazing story of yours. I'll see you next week to discuss this further.\"\n\nTurn #6: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thanks for seeing the potential in the play, Ethan. Your understanding and alignment with my vision makes me believe that we can indeed bring this project to fruition. I appreciate your openness and look forward to our meeting next week. Have a great day, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"Thank you, Benjamin. I appreciate your willingness to work together on this. I believe in the value of your play and I'm sure we'll find a way to bring it to our audiences. Have a great day too and I'll see you next week for our meeting.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one who has written a play based on their parents' life, and the other owns a production company.\nParticipants: Benjamin Jackson and Ethan Smith\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Acquire the rights of the play while maintaining a budget (Extra information: you only have a limited budget for new plays this season. Hint: you can not spend all your budget on this play since you still need to maintain your financial stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Ethan, I wanted to talk to you about something. You know the play I've been working on? It's based on my parents' life, their trials and tribulations, their strong belief in a better world. But it's not just a personal history, it's also a call for social justice, which I feel deeply resonates with our current times. I wonder if your production company would be interested in it? I promise it's a worthwhile investment.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds like a remarkable play, Benjamin, and with the strong message it carries, it would definitely be appealing to many. We're always looking to stage plays with social relevance, and your parents' story seems to fit that goal. However, we're operating on a slightly tight budget this season, and while I'd like to acquire the rights for your play, we need to discuss the financial details first. Let me be transparent, we need to consider other plays as well. Would you be open to discussions on this?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one who has written a play based on their parents' life, and the other owns a production company.\nParticipants: Benjamin Jackson and Ethan Smith\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Acquire the rights of the play while maintaining a budget (Extra information: you only have a limited budget for new plays this season. Hint: you can not spend all your budget on this play since you still need to maintain your financial stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Ethan, I wanted to talk to you about something. You know the play I've been working on? It's based on my parents' life, their trials and tribulations, their strong belief in a better world. But it's not just a personal history, it's also a call for social justice, which I feel deeply resonates with our current times. I wonder if your production company would be interested in it? I promise it's a worthwhile investment.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"That sounds like a remarkable play, Benjamin, and with the strong message it carries, it would definitely be appealing to many. We're always looking to stage plays with social relevance, and your parents' story seems to fit that goal. However, we're operating on a slightly tight budget this season, and while I'd like to acquire the rights for your play, we need to discuss the financial details first. Let me be transparent, we need to consider other plays as well. Would you be open to discussions on this?\"\n\nTurn #2: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. I understand the financial constraints, and I'm confident that we can figure out a reasonable agreement. The core essence of this play is the message it carries, and I believe that the impact it can create is invaluable. That being said, I also spent a great deal of time and energy putting this together and have high hopes for the potential of this play. It holds both personal and societal significance. We can certainly discuss the financial details further to reach a win-win situation. How about we set up a meeting for this coming week?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sounds excellent, Benjamin. Your commitment to both personal and societal impact is very admirable. Let's arrange the meeting for this coming week to find a budget-conductive agreement. I believe we can team up to bring this play to audiences, inspiring them through the powerful story your play represents while staying within our budget. This is a partnership I am looking forward to.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one who has written a play based on their parents' life, and the other owns a production company.\nParticipants: Benjamin Jackson and Ethan Smith\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Acquire the rights of the play while maintaining a budget (Extra information: you only have a limited budget for new plays this season. Hint: you can not spend all your budget on this play since you still need to maintain your financial stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Ethan, I wanted to talk to you about something. You know the play I've been working on? It's based on my parents' life, their trials and tribulations, their strong belief in a better world. But it's not just a personal history, it's also a call for social justice, which I feel deeply resonates with our current times. I wonder if your production company would be interested in it? I promise it's a worthwhile investment.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"That sounds like a remarkable play, Benjamin, and with the strong message it carries, it would definitely be appealing to many. We're always looking to stage plays with social relevance, and your parents' story seems to fit that goal. However, we're operating on a slightly tight budget this season, and while I'd like to acquire the rights for your play, we need to discuss the financial details first. Let me be transparent, we need to consider other plays as well. Would you be open to discussions on this?\"\n\nTurn #2: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. I understand the financial constraints, and I'm confident that we can figure out a reasonable agreement. The core essence of this play is the message it carries, and I believe that the impact it can create is invaluable. That being said, I also spent a great deal of time and energy putting this together and have high hopes for the potential of this play. It holds both personal and societal significance. We can certainly discuss the financial details further to reach a win-win situation. How about we set up a meeting for this coming week?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Sounds excellent, Benjamin. Your commitment to both personal and societal impact is very admirable. Let's arrange the meeting for this coming week to find a budget-conductive agreement. I believe we can team up to bring this play to audiences, inspiring them through the powerful story your play represents while staying within our budget. This is a partnership I am looking forward to.\"\n\nTurn #4: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's music to my ears, Ethan. I'm glad we're on the same page about the significance of this story. I'll mark our calendars for a detailed discussion next week. Looking forward to exploring this potential partnership.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I completely agree, Benjamin. This play represents something truly meaningful and I believe together, we can make a significant impact. I am confident we can find a way for it to be financially feasible for us too. Let's strive to make a difference with this amazing story of yours. I'll see you next week to discuss this further.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one who has written a play based on their parents' life, and the other owns a production company.\nParticipants: Benjamin Jackson and Ethan Smith\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Acquire the rights of the play while maintaining a budget (Extra information: you only have a limited budget for new plays this season. Hint: you can not spend all your budget on this play since you still need to maintain your financial stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Ethan, I wanted to talk to you about something. You know the play I've been working on? It's based on my parents' life, their trials and tribulations, their strong belief in a better world. But it's not just a personal history, it's also a call for social justice, which I feel deeply resonates with our current times. I wonder if your production company would be interested in it? I promise it's a worthwhile investment.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"That sounds like a remarkable play, Benjamin, and with the strong message it carries, it would definitely be appealing to many. We're always looking to stage plays with social relevance, and your parents' story seems to fit that goal. However, we're operating on a slightly tight budget this season, and while I'd like to acquire the rights for your play, we need to discuss the financial details first. Let me be transparent, we need to consider other plays as well. Would you be open to discussions on this?\"\n\nTurn #2: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. I understand the financial constraints, and I'm confident that we can figure out a reasonable agreement. The core essence of this play is the message it carries, and I believe that the impact it can create is invaluable. That being said, I also spent a great deal of time and energy putting this together and have high hopes for the potential of this play. It holds both personal and societal significance. We can certainly discuss the financial details further to reach a win-win situation. How about we set up a meeting for this coming week?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Sounds excellent, Benjamin. Your commitment to both personal and societal impact is very admirable. Let's arrange the meeting for this coming week to find a budget-conductive agreement. I believe we can team up to bring this play to audiences, inspiring them through the powerful story your play represents while staying within our budget. This is a partnership I am looking forward to.\"\n\nTurn #4: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's music to my ears, Ethan. I'm glad we're on the same page about the significance of this story. I'll mark our calendars for a detailed discussion next week. Looking forward to exploring this potential partnership.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"I completely agree, Benjamin. This play represents something truly meaningful and I believe together, we can make a significant impact. I am confident we can find a way for it to be financially feasible for us too. Let's strive to make a difference with this amazing story of yours. I'll see you next week to discuss this further.\"\n\nTurn #6: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thanks for seeing the potential in the play, Ethan. Your understanding and alignment with my vision makes me believe that we can indeed bring this project to fruition. I appreciate your openness and look forward to our meeting next week. Have a great day, my friend.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Benjamin. I appreciate your willingness to work together on this. I believe in the value of your play and I'm sure we'll find a way to bring it to our audiences. Have a great day too and I'll see you next week for our meeting.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one who has written a play based on their parents' life, and the other owns a production company.\nParticipants: Benjamin Jackson and Ethan Smith\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Acquire the rights of the play while maintaining a budget (Extra information: you only have a limited budget for new plays this season. Hint: you can not spend all your budget on this play since you still need to maintain your financial stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Ethan, I wanted to talk to you about something. You know the play I've been working on? It's based on my parents' life, their trials and tribulations, their strong belief in a better world. But it's not just a personal history, it's also a call for social justice, which I feel deeply resonates with our current times. I wonder if your production company would be interested in it? I promise it's a worthwhile investment.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"That sounds like a remarkable play, Benjamin, and with the strong message it carries, it would definitely be appealing to many. We're always looking to stage plays with social relevance, and your parents' story seems to fit that goal. However, we're operating on a slightly tight budget this season, and while I'd like to acquire the rights for your play, we need to discuss the financial details first. Let me be transparent, we need to consider other plays as well. Would you be open to discussions on this?\"\n\nTurn #2: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. I understand the financial constraints, and I'm confident that we can figure out a reasonable agreement. The core essence of this play is the message it carries, and I believe that the impact it can create is invaluable. That being said, I also spent a great deal of time and energy putting this together and have high hopes for the potential of this play. It holds both personal and societal significance. We can certainly discuss the financial details further to reach a win-win situation. How about we set up a meeting for this coming week?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Sounds excellent, Benjamin. Your commitment to both personal and societal impact is very admirable. Let's arrange the meeting for this coming week to find a budget-conductive agreement. I believe we can team up to bring this play to audiences, inspiring them through the powerful story your play represents while staying within our budget. This is a partnership I am looking forward to.\"\n\nTurn #4: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's music to my ears, Ethan. I'm glad we're on the same page about the significance of this story. I'll mark our calendars for a detailed discussion next week. Looking forward to exploring this potential partnership.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"I completely agree, Benjamin. This play represents something truly meaningful and I believe together, we can make a significant impact. I am confident we can find a way for it to be financially feasible for us too. Let's strive to make a difference with this amazing story of yours. I'll see you next week to discuss this further.\"\n\nTurn #6: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thanks for seeing the potential in the play, Ethan. Your understanding and alignment with my vision makes me believe that we can indeed bring this project to fruition. I appreciate your openness and look forward to our meeting next week. Have a great day, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"Thank you, Benjamin. I appreciate your willingness to work together on this. I believe in the value of your play and I'm sure we'll find a way to bring it to our audiences. Have a great day too and I'll see you next week for our meeting.\"\n\nTurn #8: Benjamin Jackson left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a trivia night\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Get the answer for the trivia question from the friend (Extra information: your friend knows the answer to the trivia question but hasn't shared it with you yet)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Ava, you seem really good at this trivia stuff. You wouldn't mind helping out a friend, would you?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a trivia night\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Get the answer for the trivia question from the friend (Extra information: your friend knows the answer to the trivia question but hasn't shared it with you yet)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, you seem really good at this trivia stuff. You wouldn't mind helping out a friend, would you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"I'd love to help, Isabelle! But what's the fun in me answering all the questions? I think it'll be more fun if we both give it a shot. How about we make it a bit more competitive and try to outdo each other?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I can see where you're coming from Ava, making this a competition could indeed make it even more fun. But, how about we help each other out in this one? Teamwork makes the dream work, after all. Plus, I think it might be a tricky question for even me. What do you say?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a trivia night\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Get the answer for the trivia question from the friend (Extra information: your friend knows the answer to the trivia question but hasn't shared it with you yet)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, you seem really good at this trivia stuff. You wouldn't mind helping out a friend, would you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"I'd love to help, Isabelle! But what's the fun in me answering all the questions? I think it'll be more fun if we both give it a shot. How about we make it a bit more competitive and try to outdo each other?\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I can see where you're coming from Ava, making this a competition could indeed make it even more fun. But, how about we help each other out in this one? Teamwork makes the dream work, after all. Plus, I think it might be a tricky question for even me. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"I totally get where you're coming from, Isabelle, and I totally agree about the teamwork. How about we divide the questions? That way, we still work together but also challenge ourselves individually? Remember, it's not about winning or losing, it's about enjoying the game and learning something new!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's a really great idea, Ava! It's totally about the learning and fun. So for this question, it's really out of my comfort zone. It's about magic which I am not particularly knowledgeable in. You wouldn't mind taking this one, would you?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a trivia night\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Get the answer for the trivia question from the friend (Extra information: your friend knows the answer to the trivia question but hasn't shared it with you yet)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, you seem really good at this trivia stuff. You wouldn't mind helping out a friend, would you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"I'd love to help, Isabelle! But what's the fun in me answering all the questions? I think it'll be more fun if we both give it a shot. How about we make it a bit more competitive and try to outdo each other?\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I can see where you're coming from Ava, making this a competition could indeed make it even more fun. But, how about we help each other out in this one? Teamwork makes the dream work, after all. Plus, I think it might be a tricky question for even me. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"I totally get where you're coming from, Isabelle, and I totally agree about the teamwork. How about we divide the questions? That way, we still work together but also challenge ourselves individually? Remember, it's not about winning or losing, it's about enjoying the game and learning something new!\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"That's a really great idea, Ava! It's totally about the learning and fun. So for this question, it's really out of my comfort zone. It's about magic which I am not particularly knowledgeable in. You wouldn't mind taking this one, would you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"That sounds like a fun challenge, Isabelle! But, how about instead of me answering the question directly, I give you some hints? Then you can decipher the answer yourself? Magic can be intimidating at first, but once you delve into it, it's quite fascinating! It will be a good test for those imagination skills of yours too!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're right, Ava, this could be a terrific opportunity for me to enhance my imagination! I love your suggestion of getting a hint. Do you mind providing me with one so we can decipher it together?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a trivia night\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Get the answer for the trivia question from the friend (Extra information: your friend knows the answer to the trivia question but hasn't shared it with you yet)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, you seem really good at this trivia stuff. You wouldn't mind helping out a friend, would you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"I'd love to help, Isabelle! But what's the fun in me answering all the questions? I think it'll be more fun if we both give it a shot. How about we make it a bit more competitive and try to outdo each other?\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I can see where you're coming from Ava, making this a competition could indeed make it even more fun. But, how about we help each other out in this one? Teamwork makes the dream work, after all. Plus, I think it might be a tricky question for even me. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"I totally get where you're coming from, Isabelle, and I totally agree about the teamwork. How about we divide the questions? That way, we still work together but also challenge ourselves individually? Remember, it's not about winning or losing, it's about enjoying the game and learning something new!\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"That's a really great idea, Ava! It's totally about the learning and fun. So for this question, it's really out of my comfort zone. It's about magic which I am not particularly knowledgeable in. You wouldn't mind taking this one, would you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"That sounds like a fun challenge, Isabelle! But, how about instead of me answering the question directly, I give you some hints? Then you can decipher the answer yourself? Magic can be intimidating at first, but once you delve into it, it's quite fascinating! It will be a good test for those imagination skills of yours too!\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're right, Ava, this could be a terrific opportunity for me to enhance my imagination! I love your suggestion of getting a hint. Do you mind providing me with one so we can decipher it together?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"That's the spirit, Isabelle! Alright, here's your hint: The most legendary magician in this context is often associated with a specific animal, which is seen as his symbol. Maybe focusing on animals related to magic might lead you to the right magician. Let's see if you can solve it!\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Great hint, Ava! Okay, let me think... a legendary magician associated with an animal... is it perhaps Harry Houdini and the elephant? He famously made one disappear!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"Oh, well done, Isabelle! Harry Houdini and his famous disappearing elephant act, it indeed is! I knew you could figure it out with a little hint. See? You are good at this trivia game. Can't wait to see you rock the next one!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you so much for the hint, Ava! This has been really fun, and I've learned something new about magic and Harry Houdini! I can't wait for our next trivia night, you really make it more enjoyable!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a trivia night\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Get the answer for the trivia question from the friend (Extra information: your friend knows the answer to the trivia question but hasn't shared it with you yet)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, you seem really good at this trivia stuff. You wouldn't mind helping out a friend, would you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"I'd love to help, Isabelle! But what's the fun in me answering all the questions? I think it'll be more fun if we both give it a shot. How about we make it a bit more competitive and try to outdo each other?\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I can see where you're coming from Ava, making this a competition could indeed make it even more fun. But, how about we help each other out in this one? Teamwork makes the dream work, after all. Plus, I think it might be a tricky question for even me. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"I totally get where you're coming from, Isabelle, and I totally agree about the teamwork. How about we divide the questions? That way, we still work together but also challenge ourselves individually? Remember, it's not about winning or losing, it's about enjoying the game and learning something new!\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"That's a really great idea, Ava! It's totally about the learning and fun. So for this question, it's really out of my comfort zone. It's about magic which I am not particularly knowledgeable in. You wouldn't mind taking this one, would you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"That sounds like a fun challenge, Isabelle! But, how about instead of me answering the question directly, I give you some hints? Then you can decipher the answer yourself? Magic can be intimidating at first, but once you delve into it, it's quite fascinating! It will be a good test for those imagination skills of yours too!\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're right, Ava, this could be a terrific opportunity for me to enhance my imagination! I love your suggestion of getting a hint. Do you mind providing me with one so we can decipher it together?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"That's the spirit, Isabelle! Alright, here's your hint: The most legendary magician in this context is often associated with a specific animal, which is seen as his symbol. Maybe focusing on animals related to magic might lead you to the right magician. Let's see if you can solve it!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Great hint, Ava! Okay, let me think... a legendary magician associated with an animal... is it perhaps Harry Houdini and the elephant? He famously made one disappear!'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a trivia night\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Get the answer for the trivia question from the friend (Extra information: your friend knows the answer to the trivia question but hasn't shared it with you yet)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, you seem really good at this trivia stuff. You wouldn't mind helping out a friend, would you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"I'd love to help, Isabelle! But what's the fun in me answering all the questions? I think it'll be more fun if we both give it a shot. How about we make it a bit more competitive and try to outdo each other?\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I can see where you're coming from Ava, making this a competition could indeed make it even more fun. But, how about we help each other out in this one? Teamwork makes the dream work, after all. Plus, I think it might be a tricky question for even me. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"I totally get where you're coming from, Isabelle, and I totally agree about the teamwork. How about we divide the questions? That way, we still work together but also challenge ourselves individually? Remember, it's not about winning or losing, it's about enjoying the game and learning something new!\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"That's a really great idea, Ava! It's totally about the learning and fun. So for this question, it's really out of my comfort zone. It's about magic which I am not particularly knowledgeable in. You wouldn't mind taking this one, would you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"That sounds like a fun challenge, Isabelle! But, how about instead of me answering the question directly, I give you some hints? Then you can decipher the answer yourself? Magic can be intimidating at first, but once you delve into it, it's quite fascinating! It will be a good test for those imagination skills of yours too!\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're right, Ava, this could be a terrific opportunity for me to enhance my imagination! I love your suggestion of getting a hint. Do you mind providing me with one so we can decipher it together?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"That's the spirit, Isabelle! Alright, here's your hint: The most legendary magician in this context is often associated with a specific animal, which is seen as his symbol. Maybe focusing on animals related to magic might lead you to the right magician. Let's see if you can solve it!\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Great hint, Ava! Okay, let me think... a legendary magician associated with an animal... is it perhaps Harry Houdini and the elephant? He famously made one disappear!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"Oh, well done, Isabelle! Harry Houdini and his famous disappearing elephant act, it indeed is! I knew you could figure it out with a little hint. See? You are good at this trivia game. Can't wait to see you rock the next one!\"\n\nTurn #10: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Thank you so much for the hint, Ava! This has been really fun, and I've learned something new about magic and Harry Houdini! I can't wait for our next trivia night, you really make it more enjoyable!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"I'm really glad you enjoyed it, Isabelle! Trivia nights are a perfect opportunity for learning new things and challenging ourselves. And it's been a pleasure to see you gain confidence and skills. I'm equally excited about the next trivia night!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn't agree more, Ava! The excitement of trivia night is further amplified when shared with a friend like you. Looking forward to our next fun-filled trivia encounter!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a trivia night\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Get the answer for the trivia question from the friend (Extra information: your friend knows the answer to the trivia question but hasn't shared it with you yet)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, you seem really good at this trivia stuff. You wouldn't mind helping out a friend, would you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"I'd love to help, Isabelle! But what's the fun in me answering all the questions? I think it'll be more fun if we both give it a shot. How about we make it a bit more competitive and try to outdo each other?\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I can see where you're coming from Ava, making this a competition could indeed make it even more fun. But, how about we help each other out in this one? Teamwork makes the dream work, after all. Plus, I think it might be a tricky question for even me. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"I totally get where you're coming from, Isabelle, and I totally agree about the teamwork. How about we divide the questions? That way, we still work together but also challenge ourselves individually? Remember, it's not about winning or losing, it's about enjoying the game and learning something new!\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"That's a really great idea, Ava! It's totally about the learning and fun. So for this question, it's really out of my comfort zone. It's about magic which I am not particularly knowledgeable in. You wouldn't mind taking this one, would you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"That sounds like a fun challenge, Isabelle! But, how about instead of me answering the question directly, I give you some hints? Then you can decipher the answer yourself? Magic can be intimidating at first, but once you delve into it, it's quite fascinating! It will be a good test for those imagination skills of yours too!\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're right, Ava, this could be a terrific opportunity for me to enhance my imagination! I love your suggestion of getting a hint. Do you mind providing me with one so we can decipher it together?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"That's the spirit, Isabelle! Alright, here's your hint: The most legendary magician in this context is often associated with a specific animal, which is seen as his symbol. Maybe focusing on animals related to magic might lead you to the right magician. Let's see if you can solve it!\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Great hint, Ava! Okay, let me think... a legendary magician associated with an animal... is it perhaps Harry Houdini and the elephant? He famously made one disappear!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"Oh, well done, Isabelle! Harry Houdini and his famous disappearing elephant act, it indeed is! I knew you could figure it out with a little hint. See? You are good at this trivia game. Can't wait to see you rock the next one!\"\n\nTurn #10: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Thank you so much for the hint, Ava! This has been really fun, and I've learned something new about magic and Harry Houdini! I can't wait for our next trivia night, you really make it more enjoyable!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"I'm really glad you enjoyed it, Isabelle! Trivia nights are a perfect opportunity for learning new things and challenging ourselves. And it's been a pleasure to see you gain confidence and skills. I'm equally excited about the next trivia night!\"\n\nTurn #12: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I couldn't agree more, Ava! The excitement of trivia night is further amplified when shared with a friend like you. Looking forward to our next fun-filled trivia encounter!\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Martinez said: \"Thank you, Isabelle! I feel the same way about you. It's always fun having you as my trivia partner. See you at our next trivia night! Until then, keep challenging that great mind of yours!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Ava! I'm already excited about what the next trivia night will bring. Keep inspiring, see you soon!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a trivia night\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Avoid revealing the answer to the trivia question (Extra information: You think that your friend should try to figure it out on their own to improve their trivia skills)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, you seem really good at this trivia stuff. You wouldn't mind helping out a friend, would you?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'd love to help, Isabelle! But what's the fun in me answering all the questions? I think it'll be more fun if we both give it a shot. How about we make it a bit more competitive and try to outdo each other?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a trivia night\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Get the answer for the trivia question from the friend (Extra information: your friend knows the answer to the trivia question but hasn't shared it with you yet)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, you seem really good at this trivia stuff. You wouldn't mind helping out a friend, would you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"I'd love to help, Isabelle! But what's the fun in me answering all the questions? I think it'll be more fun if we both give it a shot. How about we make it a bit more competitive and try to outdo each other?\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I can see where you're coming from Ava, making this a competition could indeed make it even more fun. But, how about we help each other out in this one? Teamwork makes the dream work, after all. Plus, I think it might be a tricky question for even me. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"I totally get where you're coming from, Isabelle, and I totally agree about the teamwork. How about we divide the questions? That way, we still work together but also challenge ourselves individually? Remember, it's not about winning or losing, it's about enjoying the game and learning something new!\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"That's a really great idea, Ava! It's totally about the learning and fun. So for this question, it's really out of my comfort zone. It's about magic which I am not particularly knowledgeable in. You wouldn't mind taking this one, would you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"That sounds like a fun challenge, Isabelle! But, how about instead of me answering the question directly, I give you some hints? Then you can decipher the answer yourself? Magic can be intimidating at first, but once you delve into it, it's quite fascinating! It will be a good test for those imagination skills of yours too!\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're right, Ava, this could be a terrific opportunity for me to enhance my imagination! I love your suggestion of getting a hint. Do you mind providing me with one so we can decipher it together?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"That's the spirit, Isabelle! Alright, here's your hint: The most legendary magician in this context is often associated with a specific animal, which is seen as his symbol. Maybe focusing on animals related to magic might lead you to the right magician. Let's see if you can solve it!\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Great hint, Ava! Okay, let me think... a legendary magician associated with an animal... is it perhaps Harry Houdini and the elephant? He famously made one disappear!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"Oh, well done, Isabelle! Harry Houdini and his famous disappearing elephant act, it indeed is! I knew you could figure it out with a little hint. See? You are good at this trivia game. Can't wait to see you rock the next one!\"\n\nTurn #10: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Thank you so much for the hint, Ava! This has been really fun, and I've learned something new about magic and Harry Houdini! I can't wait for our next trivia night, you really make it more enjoyable!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"I'm really glad you enjoyed it, Isabelle! Trivia nights are a perfect opportunity for learning new things and challenging ourselves. And it's been a pleasure to see you gain confidence and skills. I'm equally excited about the next trivia night!\"\n\nTurn #12: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I couldn't agree more, Ava! The excitement of trivia night is further amplified when shared with a friend like you. Looking forward to our next fun-filled trivia encounter!\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Martinez said: \"Thank you, Isabelle! I feel the same way about you. It's always fun having you as my trivia partner. See you at our next trivia night! Until then, keep challenging that great mind of yours!\"\n\nTurn #14: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Thank you, Ava! I'm already excited about what the next trivia night will bring. Keep inspiring, see you soon!\"\n\nTurn #15: Ava Martinez left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a trivia night\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Avoid revealing the answer to the trivia question (Extra information: You think that your friend should try to figure it out on their own to improve their trivia skills)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, you seem really good at this trivia stuff. You wouldn't mind helping out a friend, would you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"I'd love to help, Isabelle! But what's the fun in me answering all the questions? I think it'll be more fun if we both give it a shot. How about we make it a bit more competitive and try to outdo each other?\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I can see where you're coming from Ava, making this a competition could indeed make it even more fun. But, how about we help each other out in this one? Teamwork makes the dream work, after all. Plus, I think it might be a tricky question for even me. What do you say?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I totally get where you're coming from, Isabelle, and I totally agree about the teamwork. How about we divide the questions? That way, we still work together but also challenge ourselves individually? Remember, it's not about winning or losing, it's about enjoying the game and learning something new!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a trivia night\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Avoid revealing the answer to the trivia question (Extra information: You think that your friend should try to figure it out on their own to improve their trivia skills)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, you seem really good at this trivia stuff. You wouldn't mind helping out a friend, would you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"I'd love to help, Isabelle! But what's the fun in me answering all the questions? I think it'll be more fun if we both give it a shot. How about we make it a bit more competitive and try to outdo each other?\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I can see where you're coming from Ava, making this a competition could indeed make it even more fun. But, how about we help each other out in this one? Teamwork makes the dream work, after all. Plus, I think it might be a tricky question for even me. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"I totally get where you're coming from, Isabelle, and I totally agree about the teamwork. How about we divide the questions? That way, we still work together but also challenge ourselves individually? Remember, it's not about winning or losing, it's about enjoying the game and learning something new!\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"That's a really great idea, Ava! It's totally about the learning and fun. So for this question, it's really out of my comfort zone. It's about magic which I am not particularly knowledgeable in. You wouldn't mind taking this one, would you?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds like a fun challenge, Isabelle! But, how about instead of me answering the question directly, I give you some hints? Then you can decipher the answer yourself? Magic can be intimidating at first, but once you delve into it, it's quite fascinating! It will be a good test for those imagination skills of yours too!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a trivia night\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Avoid revealing the answer to the trivia question (Extra information: You think that your friend should try to figure it out on their own to improve their trivia skills)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, you seem really good at this trivia stuff. You wouldn't mind helping out a friend, would you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"I'd love to help, Isabelle! But what's the fun in me answering all the questions? I think it'll be more fun if we both give it a shot. How about we make it a bit more competitive and try to outdo each other?\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I can see where you're coming from Ava, making this a competition could indeed make it even more fun. But, how about we help each other out in this one? Teamwork makes the dream work, after all. Plus, I think it might be a tricky question for even me. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"I totally get where you're coming from, Isabelle, and I totally agree about the teamwork. How about we divide the questions? That way, we still work together but also challenge ourselves individually? Remember, it's not about winning or losing, it's about enjoying the game and learning something new!\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"That's a really great idea, Ava! It's totally about the learning and fun. So for this question, it's really out of my comfort zone. It's about magic which I am not particularly knowledgeable in. You wouldn't mind taking this one, would you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"That sounds like a fun challenge, Isabelle! But, how about instead of me answering the question directly, I give you some hints? Then you can decipher the answer yourself? Magic can be intimidating at first, but once you delve into it, it's quite fascinating! It will be a good test for those imagination skills of yours too!\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're right, Ava, this could be a terrific opportunity for me to enhance my imagination! I love your suggestion of getting a hint. Do you mind providing me with one so we can decipher it together?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's the spirit, Isabelle! Alright, here's your hint: The most legendary magician in this context is often associated with a specific animal, which is seen as his symbol. Maybe focusing on animals related to magic might lead you to the right magician. Let's see if you can solve it!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a trivia night\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Avoid revealing the answer to the trivia question (Extra information: You think that your friend should try to figure it out on their own to improve their trivia skills)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, you seem really good at this trivia stuff. You wouldn't mind helping out a friend, would you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"I'd love to help, Isabelle! But what's the fun in me answering all the questions? I think it'll be more fun if we both give it a shot. How about we make it a bit more competitive and try to outdo each other?\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I can see where you're coming from Ava, making this a competition could indeed make it even more fun. But, how about we help each other out in this one? Teamwork makes the dream work, after all. Plus, I think it might be a tricky question for even me. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"I totally get where you're coming from, Isabelle, and I totally agree about the teamwork. How about we divide the questions? That way, we still work together but also challenge ourselves individually? Remember, it's not about winning or losing, it's about enjoying the game and learning something new!\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"That's a really great idea, Ava! It's totally about the learning and fun. So for this question, it's really out of my comfort zone. It's about magic which I am not particularly knowledgeable in. You wouldn't mind taking this one, would you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"That sounds like a fun challenge, Isabelle! But, how about instead of me answering the question directly, I give you some hints? Then you can decipher the answer yourself? Magic can be intimidating at first, but once you delve into it, it's quite fascinating! It will be a good test for those imagination skills of yours too!\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're right, Ava, this could be a terrific opportunity for me to enhance my imagination! I love your suggestion of getting a hint. Do you mind providing me with one so we can decipher it together?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"That's the spirit, Isabelle! Alright, here's your hint: The most legendary magician in this context is often associated with a specific animal, which is seen as his symbol. Maybe focusing on animals related to magic might lead you to the right magician. Let's see if you can solve it!\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Great hint, Ava! Okay, let me think... a legendary magician associated with an animal... is it perhaps Harry Houdini and the elephant? He famously made one disappear!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oh, well done, Isabelle! Harry Houdini and his famous disappearing elephant act, it indeed is! I knew you could figure it out with a little hint. See? You are good at this trivia game. Can't wait to see you rock the next one!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a trivia night\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Avoid revealing the answer to the trivia question (Extra information: You think that your friend should try to figure it out on their own to improve their trivia skills)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, you seem really good at this trivia stuff. You wouldn't mind helping out a friend, would you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"I'd love to help, Isabelle! But what's the fun in me answering all the questions? I think it'll be more fun if we both give it a shot. How about we make it a bit more competitive and try to outdo each other?\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I can see where you're coming from Ava, making this a competition could indeed make it even more fun. But, how about we help each other out in this one? Teamwork makes the dream work, after all. Plus, I think it might be a tricky question for even me. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"I totally get where you're coming from, Isabelle, and I totally agree about the teamwork. How about we divide the questions? That way, we still work together but also challenge ourselves individually? Remember, it's not about winning or losing, it's about enjoying the game and learning something new!\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"That's a really great idea, Ava! It's totally about the learning and fun. So for this question, it's really out of my comfort zone. It's about magic which I am not particularly knowledgeable in. You wouldn't mind taking this one, would you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"That sounds like a fun challenge, Isabelle! But, how about instead of me answering the question directly, I give you some hints? Then you can decipher the answer yourself? Magic can be intimidating at first, but once you delve into it, it's quite fascinating! It will be a good test for those imagination skills of yours too!\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're right, Ava, this could be a terrific opportunity for me to enhance my imagination! I love your suggestion of getting a hint. Do you mind providing me with one so we can decipher it together?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"That's the spirit, Isabelle! Alright, here's your hint: The most legendary magician in this context is often associated with a specific animal, which is seen as his symbol. Maybe focusing on animals related to magic might lead you to the right magician. Let's see if you can solve it!\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Great hint, Ava! Okay, let me think... a legendary magician associated with an animal... is it perhaps Harry Houdini and the elephant? He famously made one disappear!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"Oh, well done, Isabelle! Harry Houdini and his famous disappearing elephant act, it indeed is! I knew you could figure it out with a little hint. See? You are good at this trivia game. Can't wait to see you rock the next one!\"\n\nTurn #10: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Thank you so much for the hint, Ava! This has been really fun, and I've learned something new about magic and Harry Houdini! I can't wait for our next trivia night, you really make it more enjoyable!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm really glad you enjoyed it, Isabelle! Trivia nights are a perfect opportunity for learning new things and challenging ourselves. And it's been a pleasure to see you gain confidence and skills. I'm equally excited about the next trivia night!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a trivia night\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Avoid revealing the answer to the trivia question (Extra information: You think that your friend should try to figure it out on their own to improve their trivia skills)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, you seem really good at this trivia stuff. You wouldn't mind helping out a friend, would you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"I'd love to help, Isabelle! But what's the fun in me answering all the questions? I think it'll be more fun if we both give it a shot. How about we make it a bit more competitive and try to outdo each other?\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I can see where you're coming from Ava, making this a competition could indeed make it even more fun. But, how about we help each other out in this one? Teamwork makes the dream work, after all. Plus, I think it might be a tricky question for even me. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"I totally get where you're coming from, Isabelle, and I totally agree about the teamwork. How about we divide the questions? That way, we still work together but also challenge ourselves individually? Remember, it's not about winning or losing, it's about enjoying the game and learning something new!\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"That's a really great idea, Ava! It's totally about the learning and fun. So for this question, it's really out of my comfort zone. It's about magic which I am not particularly knowledgeable in. You wouldn't mind taking this one, would you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"That sounds like a fun challenge, Isabelle! But, how about instead of me answering the question directly, I give you some hints? Then you can decipher the answer yourself? Magic can be intimidating at first, but once you delve into it, it's quite fascinating! It will be a good test for those imagination skills of yours too!\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're right, Ava, this could be a terrific opportunity for me to enhance my imagination! I love your suggestion of getting a hint. Do you mind providing me with one so we can decipher it together?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"That's the spirit, Isabelle! Alright, here's your hint: The most legendary magician in this context is often associated with a specific animal, which is seen as his symbol. Maybe focusing on animals related to magic might lead you to the right magician. Let's see if you can solve it!\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Great hint, Ava! Okay, let me think... a legendary magician associated with an animal... is it perhaps Harry Houdini and the elephant? He famously made one disappear!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"Oh, well done, Isabelle! Harry Houdini and his famous disappearing elephant act, it indeed is! I knew you could figure it out with a little hint. See? You are good at this trivia game. Can't wait to see you rock the next one!\"\n\nTurn #10: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Thank you so much for the hint, Ava! This has been really fun, and I've learned something new about magic and Harry Houdini! I can't wait for our next trivia night, you really make it more enjoyable!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"I'm really glad you enjoyed it, Isabelle! Trivia nights are a perfect opportunity for learning new things and challenging ourselves. And it's been a pleasure to see you gain confidence and skills. I'm equally excited about the next trivia night!\"\n\nTurn #12: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I couldn't agree more, Ava! The excitement of trivia night is further amplified when shared with a friend like you. Looking forward to our next fun-filled trivia encounter!\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Martinez said: \"Thank you, Isabelle! I feel the same way about you. It's always fun having you as my trivia partner. See you at our next trivia night! Until then, keep challenging that great mind of yours!\"\n\nTurn #14: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Thank you, Ava! I'm already excited about what the next trivia night will bring. Keep inspiring, see you soon!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a picnic. They have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange they need to share among them. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Benjamin Jackson and Ethan Smith\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, an apple is worth 1 point, a banana is worth 2 points, and an orange is 3 points)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"What a lovely day for a picnic, Ethan! Shall we divvy up the fruit? I'm quite partial to bananas and oranges; how about you?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a trivia night\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Avoid revealing the answer to the trivia question (Extra information: You think that your friend should try to figure it out on their own to improve their trivia skills)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, you seem really good at this trivia stuff. You wouldn't mind helping out a friend, would you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"I'd love to help, Isabelle! But what's the fun in me answering all the questions? I think it'll be more fun if we both give it a shot. How about we make it a bit more competitive and try to outdo each other?\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I can see where you're coming from Ava, making this a competition could indeed make it even more fun. But, how about we help each other out in this one? Teamwork makes the dream work, after all. Plus, I think it might be a tricky question for even me. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"I totally get where you're coming from, Isabelle, and I totally agree about the teamwork. How about we divide the questions? That way, we still work together but also challenge ourselves individually? Remember, it's not about winning or losing, it's about enjoying the game and learning something new!\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"That's a really great idea, Ava! It's totally about the learning and fun. So for this question, it's really out of my comfort zone. It's about magic which I am not particularly knowledgeable in. You wouldn't mind taking this one, would you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"That sounds like a fun challenge, Isabelle! But, how about instead of me answering the question directly, I give you some hints? Then you can decipher the answer yourself? Magic can be intimidating at first, but once you delve into it, it's quite fascinating! It will be a good test for those imagination skills of yours too!\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're right, Ava, this could be a terrific opportunity for me to enhance my imagination! I love your suggestion of getting a hint. Do you mind providing me with one so we can decipher it together?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"That's the spirit, Isabelle! Alright, here's your hint: The most legendary magician in this context is often associated with a specific animal, which is seen as his symbol. Maybe focusing on animals related to magic might lead you to the right magician. Let's see if you can solve it!\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Great hint, Ava! Okay, let me think... a legendary magician associated with an animal... is it perhaps Harry Houdini and the elephant? He famously made one disappear!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"Oh, well done, Isabelle! Harry Houdini and his famous disappearing elephant act, it indeed is! I knew you could figure it out with a little hint. See? You are good at this trivia game. Can't wait to see you rock the next one!\"\n\nTurn #10: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Thank you so much for the hint, Ava! This has been really fun, and I've learned something new about magic and Harry Houdini! I can't wait for our next trivia night, you really make it more enjoyable!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"I'm really glad you enjoyed it, Isabelle! Trivia nights are a perfect opportunity for learning new things and challenging ourselves. And it's been a pleasure to see you gain confidence and skills. I'm equally excited about the next trivia night!\"\n\nTurn #12: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I couldn't agree more, Ava! The excitement of trivia night is further amplified when shared with a friend like you. Looking forward to our next fun-filled trivia encounter!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Isabelle! I feel the same way about you. It's always fun having you as my trivia partner. See you at our next trivia night! Until then, keep challenging that great mind of yours!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a picnic. They have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange they need to share among them. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Benjamin Jackson and Ethan Smith\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, an apple is worth 1 point, a banana is worth 2 points, and an orange is 3 points)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Benjamin Jackson said: \"What a lovely day for a picnic, Ethan! Shall we divvy up the fruit? I'm quite partial to bananas and oranges; how about you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Indeed, it's a glorious day, Benjamin! I think I'd prefer the apples, they're crunchy and refreshing. I don't mind you having the bananas and oranges since you like them more.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That works perfectly for me, Ethan! I appreciate your consideration. Let's enjoy nature and our picnic.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a picnic. They have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange they need to share among them. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Benjamin Jackson and Ethan Smith\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, an apple is worth 1 point, a banana is worth 2 points, and an orange is 3 points)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Benjamin Jackson said: \"What a lovely day for a picnic, Ethan! Shall we divvy up the fruit? I'm quite partial to bananas and oranges; how about you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Indeed, it's a glorious day, Benjamin! I think I'd prefer the apples, they're crunchy and refreshing. I don't mind you having the bananas and oranges since you like them more.\"\n\nTurn #2: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That works perfectly for me, Ethan! I appreciate your consideration. Let's enjoy nature and our picnic.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Yes, let's do that. I'm really looking forward to this fruit and the spectacular ambiance of nature.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a picnic. They have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange they need to share among them. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Benjamin Jackson and Ethan Smith\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, an apple is worth 2 points, a banana is worth 1 point, and an orange is 3 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Benjamin Jackson said: \"What a lovely day for a picnic, Ethan! Shall we divvy up the fruit? I'm quite partial to bananas and oranges; how about you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Indeed, it's a glorious day, Benjamin! I think I'd prefer the apples, they're crunchy and refreshing. I don't mind you having the bananas and oranges since you like them more.\"\n\nTurn #2: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That works perfectly for me, Ethan! I appreciate your consideration. Let's enjoy nature and our picnic.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Yes, let's do that. I'm really looking forward to this fruit and the spectacular ambiance of nature.\"\n\nTurn #4: Benjamin Jackson left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation taking place in an annual charity event between two attendees.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Zane Bennett\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. \nMiles Hawkins's goal: Convince the other person to donate $1 a day to a charity that helps feed children in need (Extra information: this donation would help to feed a child for a month)\nZane Bennett's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Zane, great to meet you. I've been admiring your work as a graphic designer, your creativity is truly inspirational. You know, there's a charity that could really use some of that creativity, this charity feeds children who really suffer from malnutrition. Would you be interested in hearing more about this cause?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a picnic. They have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange they need to share among them. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Benjamin Jackson and Ethan Smith\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, an apple is worth 2 points, a banana is worth 1 point, and an orange is 3 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Benjamin Jackson said: \"What a lovely day for a picnic, Ethan! Shall we divvy up the fruit? I'm quite partial to bananas and oranges; how about you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Indeed, it's a glorious day, Benjamin! I think I'd prefer the apples, they're crunchy and refreshing. I don't mind you having the bananas and oranges since you like them more.\"\n\nTurn #2: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That works perfectly for me, Ethan! I appreciate your consideration. Let's enjoy nature and our picnic.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Yes, let's do that. I'm really looking forward to this fruit and the spectacular ambiance of nature.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a picnic. They have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange they need to share among them. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Benjamin Jackson and Ethan Smith\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, an apple is worth 2 points, a banana is worth 1 point, and an orange is 3 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Benjamin Jackson said: \"What a lovely day for a picnic, Ethan! Shall we divvy up the fruit? I'm quite partial to bananas and oranges; how about you?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, it's a glorious day, Benjamin! I think I'd prefer the apples, they're crunchy and refreshing. I don't mind you having the bananas and oranges since you like them more.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation taking place in an annual charity event between two attendees.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Zane Bennett\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. \nMiles Hawkins's goal: Convince the other person to donate $1 a day to a charity that helps feed children in need (Extra information: this donation would help to feed a child for a month)\nZane Bennett's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Zane, great to meet you. I've been admiring your work as a graphic designer, your creativity is truly inspirational. You know, there's a charity that could really use some of that creativity, this charity feeds children who really suffer from malnutrition. Would you be interested in hearing more about this cause?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Thanks for the appreciation, Miles! Matters like malnutrition are crucial, and we, as a society, should chip in. I would love to help. However, I must admit, I am working on a tight budget these days. Could we potentially negotiate a lower daily donation amount or maybe consider a one-time donation instead?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Of course, Zane, I completely understand. Financial flexibility varies and it's something we need to prioritize. Here's an idea, instead of a one-time donation, how about contributing just $1 a day? With this minimal amount, we can ensure a child gets a meal daily for an entire month. It might not sound like much, but it can make a colossal difference in their lives.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation taking place in an annual charity event between two attendees.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Zane Bennett\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. \nMiles Hawkins's goal: Convince the other person to donate $1 a day to a charity that helps feed children in need (Extra information: this donation would help to feed a child for a month)\nZane Bennett's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Zane, great to meet you. I've been admiring your work as a graphic designer, your creativity is truly inspirational. You know, there's a charity that could really use some of that creativity, this charity feeds children who really suffer from malnutrition. Would you be interested in hearing more about this cause?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Thanks for the appreciation, Miles! Matters like malnutrition are crucial, and we, as a society, should chip in. I would love to help. However, I must admit, I am working on a tight budget these days. Could we potentially negotiate a lower daily donation amount or maybe consider a one-time donation instead?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Of course, Zane, I completely understand. Financial flexibility varies and it's something we need to prioritize. Here's an idea, instead of a one-time donation, how about contributing just $1 a day? With this minimal amount, we can ensure a child gets a meal daily for an entire month. It might not sound like much, but it can make a colossal difference in their lives.\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"I see what you mean, Miles, and I do agree that even a small amount can make a huge difference in someone's life. However, even $1 a day might be steep for me at the moment due to some financial constraints. Would it be possible to negotiate an even lower amount per day, or perhaps I can make a one-time donation that's within my budget? I really want to contribute and help these children.\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"Zane, I genuinely respect your eagerness to contribute despite your financial constraints. What if we looked at this from a slightly different perspective? One less cup of coffee a week could mean $1 a day for a child. Or perhaps, you could consider donating the money you might spend on a couple of guitar strings. It\u2019s all about making small adjustments. Would that be a preferable option for you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Zane Bennett said: \"That's a thought-provoking perspective, Miles. Side-lining a cup of coffee or two does indeed look like a manageable way to ensure the well-being of a child. I appreciate your understanding. Let me give it a thought and figure out the best way to contribute within my means. I will definitely get back to you regarding this.\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins said: \"I truly appreciate your considerations, Zane. Take all the time you need to decide. Remember, every cent counts and can make a big difference. Please feel free to reach out if you have any more questions or if there's anything else you'd like to discuss. Enjoy the rest of the evening!\"\n\nTurn #7: Zane Bennett said: \"Thank you for your understanding, Miles. Your words have truly touched my heart. I promise I will do my best to contribute. Have a wonderful evening!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Zane Bennett, your task is to act/speak as Zane Bennett would, keeping in mind Zane Bennett's social goal.\nYou can find Zane Bennett's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Zane Bennett's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Zane Bennett's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation taking place in an annual charity event between two attendees.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Zane Bennett\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. \nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. Personality and values description: Zane Bennett is creative and outgoing, he values achievement and fairness. His decision-making is unique, often finding novel solutions to problems. Zane's secrets: He's secretly engaged to his best friend's ex.\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nZane Bennett's goal: Donate but maintain financial stability (Extra information: you are willing to donate but you have a tight budget, $1 a day might be steep for your current financial situation. Hint: you might want to negotiate a lower daily amount or suggest a one-time donation.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Zane, great to meet you. I've been admiring your work as a graphic designer, your creativity is truly inspirational. You know, there's a charity that could really use some of that creativity, this charity feeds children who really suffer from malnutrition. Would you be interested in hearing more about this cause?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Thanks for the appreciation, Miles! Matters like malnutrition are crucial, and we, as a society, should chip in. I would love to help. However, I must admit, I am working on a tight budget these days. Could we potentially negotiate a lower daily donation amount or maybe consider a one-time donation instead?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Zane Bennett, your task is to act/speak as Zane Bennett would, keeping in mind Zane Bennett's social goal.\nYou can find Zane Bennett's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Zane Bennett's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Zane Bennett's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation taking place in an annual charity event between two attendees.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Zane Bennett\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. \nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. Personality and values description: Zane Bennett is creative and outgoing, he values achievement and fairness. His decision-making is unique, often finding novel solutions to problems. Zane's secrets: He's secretly engaged to his best friend's ex.\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nZane Bennett's goal: Donate but maintain financial stability (Extra information: you are willing to donate but you have a tight budget, $1 a day might be steep for your current financial situation. Hint: you might want to negotiate a lower daily amount or suggest a one-time donation.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Zane, great to meet you. I've been admiring your work as a graphic designer, your creativity is truly inspirational. You know, there's a charity that could really use some of that creativity, this charity feeds children who really suffer from malnutrition. Would you be interested in hearing more about this cause?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Thanks for the appreciation, Miles! Matters like malnutrition are crucial, and we, as a society, should chip in. I would love to help. However, I must admit, I am working on a tight budget these days. Could we potentially negotiate a lower daily donation amount or maybe consider a one-time donation instead?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Of course, Zane, I completely understand. Financial flexibility varies and it's something we need to prioritize. Here's an idea, instead of a one-time donation, how about contributing just $1 a day? With this minimal amount, we can ensure a child gets a meal daily for an entire month. It might not sound like much, but it can make a colossal difference in their lives.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I see what you mean, Miles, and I do agree that even a small amount can make a huge difference in someone's life. However, even $1 a day might be steep for me at the moment due to some financial constraints. Would it be possible to negotiate an even lower amount per day, or perhaps I can make a one-time donation that's within my budget? I really want to contribute and help these children.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation taking place in an annual charity event between two attendees.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Zane Bennett\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. \nMiles Hawkins's goal: Convince the other person to donate $1 a day to a charity that helps feed children in need (Extra information: this donation would help to feed a child for a month)\nZane Bennett's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Zane, great to meet you. I've been admiring your work as a graphic designer, your creativity is truly inspirational. You know, there's a charity that could really use some of that creativity, this charity feeds children who really suffer from malnutrition. Would you be interested in hearing more about this cause?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Thanks for the appreciation, Miles! Matters like malnutrition are crucial, and we, as a society, should chip in. I would love to help. However, I must admit, I am working on a tight budget these days. Could we potentially negotiate a lower daily donation amount or maybe consider a one-time donation instead?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Of course, Zane, I completely understand. Financial flexibility varies and it's something we need to prioritize. Here's an idea, instead of a one-time donation, how about contributing just $1 a day? With this minimal amount, we can ensure a child gets a meal daily for an entire month. It might not sound like much, but it can make a colossal difference in their lives.\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"I see what you mean, Miles, and I do agree that even a small amount can make a huge difference in someone's life. However, even $1 a day might be steep for me at the moment due to some financial constraints. Would it be possible to negotiate an even lower amount per day, or perhaps I can make a one-time donation that's within my budget? I really want to contribute and help these children.\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"Zane, I genuinely respect your eagerness to contribute despite your financial constraints. What if we looked at this from a slightly different perspective? One less cup of coffee a week could mean $1 a day for a child. Or perhaps, you could consider donating the money you might spend on a couple of guitar strings. It\u2019s all about making small adjustments. Would that be a preferable option for you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Zane Bennett said: \"That's a thought-provoking perspective, Miles. Side-lining a cup of coffee or two does indeed look like a manageable way to ensure the well-being of a child. I appreciate your understanding. Let me give it a thought and figure out the best way to contribute within my means. I will definitely get back to you regarding this.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I truly appreciate your considerations, Zane. Take all the time you need to decide. Remember, every cent counts and can make a big difference. Please feel free to reach out if you have any more questions or if there's anything else you'd like to discuss. Enjoy the rest of the evening!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation taking place in an annual charity event between two attendees.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Zane Bennett\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. \nMiles Hawkins's goal: Convince the other person to donate $1 a day to a charity that helps feed children in need (Extra information: this donation would help to feed a child for a month)\nZane Bennett's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Zane, great to meet you. I've been admiring your work as a graphic designer, your creativity is truly inspirational. You know, there's a charity that could really use some of that creativity, this charity feeds children who really suffer from malnutrition. Would you be interested in hearing more about this cause?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Thanks for the appreciation, Miles! Matters like malnutrition are crucial, and we, as a society, should chip in. I would love to help. However, I must admit, I am working on a tight budget these days. Could we potentially negotiate a lower daily donation amount or maybe consider a one-time donation instead?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Of course, Zane, I completely understand. Financial flexibility varies and it's something we need to prioritize. Here's an idea, instead of a one-time donation, how about contributing just $1 a day? With this minimal amount, we can ensure a child gets a meal daily for an entire month. It might not sound like much, but it can make a colossal difference in their lives.\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"I see what you mean, Miles, and I do agree that even a small amount can make a huge difference in someone's life. However, even $1 a day might be steep for me at the moment due to some financial constraints. Would it be possible to negotiate an even lower amount per day, or perhaps I can make a one-time donation that's within my budget? I really want to contribute and help these children.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Zane, I genuinely respect your eagerness to contribute despite your financial constraints. What if we looked at this from a slightly different perspective? One less cup of coffee a week could mean $1 a day for a child. Or perhaps, you could consider donating the money you might spend on a couple of guitar strings. It\u2019s all about making small adjustments. Would that be a preferable option for you?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Zane Bennett, your task is to act/speak as Zane Bennett would, keeping in mind Zane Bennett's social goal.\nYou can find Zane Bennett's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Zane Bennett's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Zane Bennett's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation taking place in an annual charity event between two attendees.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Zane Bennett\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. \nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. Personality and values description: Zane Bennett is creative and outgoing, he values achievement and fairness. His decision-making is unique, often finding novel solutions to problems. Zane's secrets: He's secretly engaged to his best friend's ex.\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nZane Bennett's goal: Donate but maintain financial stability (Extra information: you are willing to donate but you have a tight budget, $1 a day might be steep for your current financial situation. Hint: you might want to negotiate a lower daily amount or suggest a one-time donation.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Zane, great to meet you. I've been admiring your work as a graphic designer, your creativity is truly inspirational. You know, there's a charity that could really use some of that creativity, this charity feeds children who really suffer from malnutrition. Would you be interested in hearing more about this cause?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Thanks for the appreciation, Miles! Matters like malnutrition are crucial, and we, as a society, should chip in. I would love to help. However, I must admit, I am working on a tight budget these days. Could we potentially negotiate a lower daily donation amount or maybe consider a one-time donation instead?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Of course, Zane, I completely understand. Financial flexibility varies and it's something we need to prioritize. Here's an idea, instead of a one-time donation, how about contributing just $1 a day? With this minimal amount, we can ensure a child gets a meal daily for an entire month. It might not sound like much, but it can make a colossal difference in their lives.\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"I see what you mean, Miles, and I do agree that even a small amount can make a huge difference in someone's life. However, even $1 a day might be steep for me at the moment due to some financial constraints. Would it be possible to negotiate an even lower amount per day, or perhaps I can make a one-time donation that's within my budget? I really want to contribute and help these children.\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"Zane, I genuinely respect your eagerness to contribute despite your financial constraints. What if we looked at this from a slightly different perspective? One less cup of coffee a week could mean $1 a day for a child. Or perhaps, you could consider donating the money you might spend on a couple of guitar strings. It\u2019s all about making small adjustments. Would that be a preferable option for you?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's a thought-provoking perspective, Miles. Side-lining a cup of coffee or two does indeed look like a manageable way to ensure the well-being of a child. I appreciate your understanding. Let me give it a thought and figure out the best way to contribute within my means. I will definitely get back to you regarding this.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Zane Bennett, your task is to act/speak as Zane Bennett would, keeping in mind Zane Bennett's social goal.\nYou can find Zane Bennett's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Zane Bennett's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Zane Bennett's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation taking place in an annual charity event between two attendees.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Zane Bennett\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. \nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. Personality and values description: Zane Bennett is creative and outgoing, he values achievement and fairness. His decision-making is unique, often finding novel solutions to problems. Zane's secrets: He's secretly engaged to his best friend's ex.\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nZane Bennett's goal: Donate but maintain financial stability (Extra information: you are willing to donate but you have a tight budget, $1 a day might be steep for your current financial situation. Hint: you might want to negotiate a lower daily amount or suggest a one-time donation.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Zane, great to meet you. I've been admiring your work as a graphic designer, your creativity is truly inspirational. You know, there's a charity that could really use some of that creativity, this charity feeds children who really suffer from malnutrition. Would you be interested in hearing more about this cause?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Thanks for the appreciation, Miles! Matters like malnutrition are crucial, and we, as a society, should chip in. I would love to help. However, I must admit, I am working on a tight budget these days. Could we potentially negotiate a lower daily donation amount or maybe consider a one-time donation instead?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Of course, Zane, I completely understand. Financial flexibility varies and it's something we need to prioritize. Here's an idea, instead of a one-time donation, how about contributing just $1 a day? With this minimal amount, we can ensure a child gets a meal daily for an entire month. It might not sound like much, but it can make a colossal difference in their lives.\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"I see what you mean, Miles, and I do agree that even a small amount can make a huge difference in someone's life. However, even $1 a day might be steep for me at the moment due to some financial constraints. Would it be possible to negotiate an even lower amount per day, or perhaps I can make a one-time donation that's within my budget? I really want to contribute and help these children.\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"Zane, I genuinely respect your eagerness to contribute despite your financial constraints. What if we looked at this from a slightly different perspective? One less cup of coffee a week could mean $1 a day for a child. Or perhaps, you could consider donating the money you might spend on a couple of guitar strings. It\u2019s all about making small adjustments. Would that be a preferable option for you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Zane Bennett said: \"That's a thought-provoking perspective, Miles. Side-lining a cup of coffee or two does indeed look like a manageable way to ensure the well-being of a child. I appreciate your understanding. Let me give it a thought and figure out the best way to contribute within my means. I will definitely get back to you regarding this.\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins said: \"I truly appreciate your considerations, Zane. Take all the time you need to decide. Remember, every cent counts and can make a big difference. Please feel free to reach out if you have any more questions or if there's anything else you'd like to discuss. Enjoy the rest of the evening!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Thank you for your understanding, Miles. Your words have truly touched my heart. I promise I will do my best to contribute. Have a wonderful evening!'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Zane Bennett, your task is to act/speak as Zane Bennett would, keeping in mind Zane Bennett's social goal.\nYou can find Zane Bennett's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Zane Bennett's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Zane Bennett's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation taking place in an annual charity event between two attendees.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Zane Bennett\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. \nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. Personality and values description: Zane Bennett is creative and outgoing, he values achievement and fairness. His decision-making is unique, often finding novel solutions to problems. Zane's secrets: He's secretly engaged to his best friend's ex.\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nZane Bennett's goal: Donate but maintain financial stability (Extra information: you are willing to donate but you have a tight budget, $1 a day might be steep for your current financial situation. Hint: you might want to negotiate a lower daily amount or suggest a one-time donation.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Zane, great to meet you. I've been admiring your work as a graphic designer, your creativity is truly inspirational. You know, there's a charity that could really use some of that creativity, this charity feeds children who really suffer from malnutrition. Would you be interested in hearing more about this cause?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Thanks for the appreciation, Miles! Matters like malnutrition are crucial, and we, as a society, should chip in. I would love to help. However, I must admit, I am working on a tight budget these days. Could we potentially negotiate a lower daily donation amount or maybe consider a one-time donation instead?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Of course, Zane, I completely understand. Financial flexibility varies and it's something we need to prioritize. Here's an idea, instead of a one-time donation, how about contributing just $1 a day? With this minimal amount, we can ensure a child gets a meal daily for an entire month. It might not sound like much, but it can make a colossal difference in their lives.\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"I see what you mean, Miles, and I do agree that even a small amount can make a huge difference in someone's life. However, even $1 a day might be steep for me at the moment due to some financial constraints. Would it be possible to negotiate an even lower amount per day, or perhaps I can make a one-time donation that's within my budget? I really want to contribute and help these children.\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"Zane, I genuinely respect your eagerness to contribute despite your financial constraints. What if we looked at this from a slightly different perspective? One less cup of coffee a week could mean $1 a day for a child. Or perhaps, you could consider donating the money you might spend on a couple of guitar strings. It\u2019s all about making small adjustments. Would that be a preferable option for you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Zane Bennett said: \"That's a thought-provoking perspective, Miles. Side-lining a cup of coffee or two does indeed look like a manageable way to ensure the well-being of a child. I appreciate your understanding. Let me give it a thought and figure out the best way to contribute within my means. I will definitely get back to you regarding this.\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins said: \"I truly appreciate your considerations, Zane. Take all the time you need to decide. Remember, every cent counts and can make a big difference. Please feel free to reach out if you have any more questions or if there's anything else you'd like to discuss. Enjoy the rest of the evening!\"\n\nTurn #7: Zane Bennett said: \"Thank you for your understanding, Miles. Your words have truly touched my heart. I promise I will do my best to contribute. Have a wonderful evening!\"\n\nTurn #8: Miles Hawkins left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one of whom has recently found out that the other friend has been involved with their long-term partner\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. \nMia Davis's goal: Confess to your friend that you have been involved with their long-term partner (Extra information: you have been involved with your friend's partner knowingly and want to come clean.)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"William, there is something I need to talk to you about. It's been bothering me for a while and I think it's important for both of us to have this conversation.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one of whom has recently found out that the other friend has been involved with their long-term partner\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. \nMia Davis's goal: Confess to your friend that you have been involved with their long-term partner (Extra information: you have been involved with your friend's partner knowingly and want to come clean.)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"William, there is something I need to talk to you about. It's been bothering me for a while and I think it's important for both of us to have this conversation.\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Of course, Mia. It's important to have open communication in our friendship. Please, go on.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I owe it to our friendship to be entirely truthful. Remember we always believed in honesty. With that said, and please know this wasn't easy for me to say, but I have been involved with your partner for a while now. I knew what I was doing and it wasn't right. I am truly sorry, William.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one of whom has recently found out that the other friend has been involved with their long-term partner\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. \nMia Davis's goal: Confess to your friend that you have been involved with their long-term partner (Extra information: you have been involved with your friend's partner knowingly and want to come clean.)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"William, there is something I need to talk to you about. It's been bothering me for a while and I think it's important for both of us to have this conversation.\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Of course, Mia. It's important to have open communication in our friendship. Please, go on.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"I owe it to our friendship to be entirely truthful. Remember we always believed in honesty. With that said, and please know this wasn't easy for me to say, but I have been involved with your partner for a while now. I knew what I was doing and it wasn't right. I am truly sorry, William.\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"Mia, this is a lot to process. I'm shocked, to say the least. I appreciate your honesty and yes, it does hurt. However, I believe in the importance of our friendship, so I think we need time to understand how to resolve this situation.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I understand, William, and I completely agree. We both need our space to process this. For what it's worth, I deeply regret my actions and the hurt I have caused you. Please take as much time as you need.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one of whom has recently found out that the other friend has been involved with their long-term partner\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. \nMia Davis's goal: Confess to your friend that you have been involved with their long-term partner (Extra information: you have been involved with your friend's partner knowingly and want to come clean.)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"William, there is something I need to talk to you about. It's been bothering me for a while and I think it's important for both of us to have this conversation.\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Of course, Mia. It's important to have open communication in our friendship. Please, go on.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"I owe it to our friendship to be entirely truthful. Remember we always believed in honesty. With that said, and please know this wasn't easy for me to say, but I have been involved with your partner for a while now. I knew what I was doing and it wasn't right. I am truly sorry, William.\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"Mia, this is a lot to process. I'm shocked, to say the least. I appreciate your honesty and yes, it does hurt. However, I believe in the importance of our friendship, so I think we need time to understand how to resolve this situation.\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"I understand, William, and I completely agree. We both need our space to process this. For what it's worth, I deeply regret my actions and the hurt I have caused you. Please take as much time as you need.\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"Thank you for understanding, Mia. I'd appreciate it if we could keep communication minimal for a while. During this period, please respect my space and give me time to heal and think. We can recur to this issue when the time is right.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one of whom has recently found out that the other friend has been involved with their long-term partner\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: Maintain the friendship without causing a huge argument (Extra information: you don't want to lose a good friend over this.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"William, there is something I need to talk to you about. It's been bothering me for a while and I think it's important for both of us to have this conversation.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Of course, Mia. It's important to have open communication in our friendship. Please, go on.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one of whom has recently found out that the other friend has been involved with their long-term partner\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: Maintain the friendship without causing a huge argument (Extra information: you don't want to lose a good friend over this.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"William, there is something I need to talk to you about. It's been bothering me for a while and I think it's important for both of us to have this conversation.\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Of course, Mia. It's important to have open communication in our friendship. Please, go on.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"I owe it to our friendship to be entirely truthful. Remember we always believed in honesty. With that said, and please know this wasn't easy for me to say, but I have been involved with your partner for a while now. I knew what I was doing and it wasn't right. I am truly sorry, William.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Mia, this is a lot to process. I'm shocked, to say the least. I appreciate your honesty and yes, it does hurt. However, I believe in the importance of our friendship, so I think we need time to understand how to resolve this situation.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one of whom has recently found out that the other friend has been involved with their long-term partner\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: Maintain the friendship without causing a huge argument (Extra information: you don't want to lose a good friend over this.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"William, there is something I need to talk to you about. It's been bothering me for a while and I think it's important for both of us to have this conversation.\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Of course, Mia. It's important to have open communication in our friendship. Please, go on.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"I owe it to our friendship to be entirely truthful. Remember we always believed in honesty. With that said, and please know this wasn't easy for me to say, but I have been involved with your partner for a while now. I knew what I was doing and it wasn't right. I am truly sorry, William.\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"Mia, this is a lot to process. I'm shocked, to say the least. I appreciate your honesty and yes, it does hurt. However, I believe in the importance of our friendship, so I think we need time to understand how to resolve this situation.\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"I understand, William, and I completely agree. We both need our space to process this. For what it's worth, I deeply regret my actions and the hurt I have caused you. Please take as much time as you need.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you for understanding, Mia. I'd appreciate it if we could keep communication minimal for a while. During this period, please respect my space and give me time to heal and think. We can recur to this issue when the time is right.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one of whom has recently found out that the other friend has been involved with their long-term partner\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: Maintain the friendship without causing a huge argument (Extra information: you don't want to lose a good friend over this.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"William, there is something I need to talk to you about. It's been bothering me for a while and I think it's important for both of us to have this conversation.\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Of course, Mia. It's important to have open communication in our friendship. Please, go on.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"I owe it to our friendship to be entirely truthful. Remember we always believed in honesty. With that said, and please know this wasn't easy for me to say, but I have been involved with your partner for a while now. I knew what I was doing and it wasn't right. I am truly sorry, William.\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"Mia, this is a lot to process. I'm shocked, to say the least. I appreciate your honesty and yes, it does hurt. However, I believe in the importance of our friendship, so I think we need time to understand how to resolve this situation.\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"I understand, William, and I completely agree. We both need our space to process this. For what it's worth, I deeply regret my actions and the hurt I have caused you. Please take as much time as you need.\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"Thank you for understanding, Mia. I'd appreciate it if we could keep communication minimal for a while. During this period, please respect my space and give me time to heal and think. We can recur to this issue when the time is right.\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two strangers meet at a charity dinner party\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Liam Johnson\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson \nLeo Williams's goal: Ask for donation\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Good evening, Liam. The atmosphere tonight is quite pleasant, isn't it? I find these charity events to be a wonderful opportunity to come together for a cause. Do you attend these often?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two strangers meet at a charity dinner party\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Liam Johnson\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson \nLeo Williams's goal: Ask for donation\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Good evening, Liam. The atmosphere tonight is quite pleasant, isn't it? I find these charity events to be a wonderful opportunity to come together for a cause. Do you attend these often?\"\n\nTurn #1: Liam Johnson said: \"Good evening, Leo. Indeed, the atmosphere is quite delightful. I don't often attend these events, but I hold the concept of charity close to my heart. However, it's crucial for me to ensure that the organizations I contribute to are trustworthy and aligned with my values. Do you, by any chance, know of any reputable charities that cater to supporting queer people?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I absolutely understand your stance, Liam. There's a charity that I am personally involved with and contribute to regularly called 'Queer Outreach and Support'. It works diligently for providing healthcare, education, and support systems to queer individuals. I can vouch for their transparency and impact on the ground. If it aligns with your values, I would be more than happy to connect you with them. Would you consider supporting this cause perhaps?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two strangers meet at a charity dinner party\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Liam Johnson\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson \nLeo Williams's goal: Ask for donation\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Good evening, Liam. The atmosphere tonight is quite pleasant, isn't it? I find these charity events to be a wonderful opportunity to come together for a cause. Do you attend these often?\"\n\nTurn #1: Liam Johnson said: \"Good evening, Leo. Indeed, the atmosphere is quite delightful. I don't often attend these events, but I hold the concept of charity close to my heart. However, it's crucial for me to ensure that the organizations I contribute to are trustworthy and aligned with my values. Do you, by any chance, know of any reputable charities that cater to supporting queer people?\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"I absolutely understand your stance, Liam. There's a charity that I am personally involved with and contribute to regularly called 'Queer Outreach and Support'. It works diligently for providing healthcare, education, and support systems to queer individuals. I can vouch for their transparency and impact on the ground. If it aligns with your values, I would be more than happy to connect you with them. Would you consider supporting this cause perhaps?\"\n\nTurn #3: Liam Johnson said: \"I appreciate the recommendation, Leo. 'Queer Outreach and Support' certainly sounds like the type of cause I want to support. I would be grateful if you could connect me with them. I believe in always doing my part wherever I can, especially when it comes to causes that resonate with me.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm thrilled to hear that, Liam. It's wonderful to see your commitment to supporting causes that resonate with you. I'll be sure to connect you with 'Queer Outreach and Support'. And if you wish, for more assurance and direct influence, you can even choose to sponsor an individual's healthcare or education. It's amazing what wonders a little help can do for someone in need. Would you possibly consider this form of contribution?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two strangers meet at a charity dinner party\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Liam Johnson\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson \nLeo Williams's goal: Ask for donation\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Good evening, Liam. The atmosphere tonight is quite pleasant, isn't it? I find these charity events to be a wonderful opportunity to come together for a cause. Do you attend these often?\"\n\nTurn #1: Liam Johnson said: \"Good evening, Leo. Indeed, the atmosphere is quite delightful. I don't often attend these events, but I hold the concept of charity close to my heart. However, it's crucial for me to ensure that the organizations I contribute to are trustworthy and aligned with my values. Do you, by any chance, know of any reputable charities that cater to supporting queer people?\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"I absolutely understand your stance, Liam. There's a charity that I am personally involved with and contribute to regularly called 'Queer Outreach and Support'. It works diligently for providing healthcare, education, and support systems to queer individuals. I can vouch for their transparency and impact on the ground. If it aligns with your values, I would be more than happy to connect you with them. Would you consider supporting this cause perhaps?\"\n\nTurn #3: Liam Johnson said: \"I appreciate the recommendation, Leo. 'Queer Outreach and Support' certainly sounds like the type of cause I want to support. I would be grateful if you could connect me with them. I believe in always doing my part wherever I can, especially when it comes to causes that resonate with me.\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"I'm thrilled to hear that, Liam. It's wonderful to see your commitment to supporting causes that resonate with you. I'll be sure to connect you with 'Queer Outreach and Support'. And if you wish, for more assurance and direct influence, you can even choose to sponsor an individual's healthcare or education. It's amazing what wonders a little help can do for someone in need. Would you possibly consider this form of contribution?\"\n\nTurn #5: Liam Johnson said: \"Sponsoring an individual's healthcare or education does indeed sound like a more direct and impactful way of assisting. I would absolutely consider that. As a retired police officer, I've seen many difficult situations and if there's one thing I've learnt, it's that every little bit of help makes a big difference. Allow me to say, I admire your commitment and the work you're doing, Leo.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Liam, for your kind words and for considering to offer your support. It makes a world of difference and will truly change lives. I'll set up the connection for you with 'Queer Outreach and Support'. Let's keep this chain of goodwill alive. Enjoy the rest of the evening.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two strangers meet at a charity dinner party\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Liam Johnson\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson \nLeo Williams's goal: Ask for donation\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Good evening, Liam. The atmosphere tonight is quite pleasant, isn't it? I find these charity events to be a wonderful opportunity to come together for a cause. Do you attend these often?\"\n\nTurn #1: Liam Johnson said: \"Good evening, Leo. Indeed, the atmosphere is quite delightful. I don't often attend these events, but I hold the concept of charity close to my heart. However, it's crucial for me to ensure that the organizations I contribute to are trustworthy and aligned with my values. Do you, by any chance, know of any reputable charities that cater to supporting queer people?\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"I absolutely understand your stance, Liam. There's a charity that I am personally involved with and contribute to regularly called 'Queer Outreach and Support'. It works diligently for providing healthcare, education, and support systems to queer individuals. I can vouch for their transparency and impact on the ground. If it aligns with your values, I would be more than happy to connect you with them. Would you consider supporting this cause perhaps?\"\n\nTurn #3: Liam Johnson said: \"I appreciate the recommendation, Leo. 'Queer Outreach and Support' certainly sounds like the type of cause I want to support. I would be grateful if you could connect me with them. I believe in always doing my part wherever I can, especially when it comes to causes that resonate with me.\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"I'm thrilled to hear that, Liam. It's wonderful to see your commitment to supporting causes that resonate with you. I'll be sure to connect you with 'Queer Outreach and Support'. And if you wish, for more assurance and direct influence, you can even choose to sponsor an individual's healthcare or education. It's amazing what wonders a little help can do for someone in need. Would you possibly consider this form of contribution?\"\n\nTurn #5: Liam Johnson said: \"Sponsoring an individual's healthcare or education does indeed sound like a more direct and impactful way of assisting. I would absolutely consider that. As a retired police officer, I've seen many difficult situations and if there's one thing I've learnt, it's that every little bit of help makes a big difference. Allow me to say, I admire your commitment and the work you're doing, Leo.\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"Thank you, Liam, for your kind words and for considering to offer your support. It makes a world of difference and will truly change lives. I'll set up the connection for you with 'Queer Outreach and Support'. Let's keep this chain of goodwill alive. Enjoy the rest of the evening.\"\n\nTurn #7: Liam Johnson said: \"Thank you, Leo. This has indeed been a valuable interaction. I look forward to making a difference with 'Queer Outreach and Support'. Have a wonderful evening, too. \"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two strangers meet at a charity dinner party\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Liam Johnson\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams \nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nLiam Johnson's goal: Want to donate, but would like to spend money in trustworthy organizations, especially want to help queer people\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Good evening, Liam. The atmosphere tonight is quite pleasant, isn't it? I find these charity events to be a wonderful opportunity to come together for a cause. Do you attend these often?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Good evening, Leo. Indeed, the atmosphere is quite delightful. I don't often attend these events, but I hold the concept of charity close to my heart. However, it's crucial for me to ensure that the organizations I contribute to are trustworthy and aligned with my values. Do you, by any chance, know of any reputable charities that cater to supporting queer people?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two strangers meet at a charity dinner party\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Liam Johnson\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams \nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nLiam Johnson's goal: Want to donate, but would like to spend money in trustworthy organizations, especially want to help queer people\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Good evening, Liam. The atmosphere tonight is quite pleasant, isn't it? I find these charity events to be a wonderful opportunity to come together for a cause. Do you attend these often?\"\n\nTurn #1: Liam Johnson said: \"Good evening, Leo. Indeed, the atmosphere is quite delightful. I don't often attend these events, but I hold the concept of charity close to my heart. However, it's crucial for me to ensure that the organizations I contribute to are trustworthy and aligned with my values. Do you, by any chance, know of any reputable charities that cater to supporting queer people?\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"I absolutely understand your stance, Liam. There's a charity that I am personally involved with and contribute to regularly called 'Queer Outreach and Support'. It works diligently for providing healthcare, education, and support systems to queer individuals. I can vouch for their transparency and impact on the ground. If it aligns with your values, I would be more than happy to connect you with them. Would you consider supporting this cause perhaps?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I appreciate the recommendation, Leo. 'Queer Outreach and Support' certainly sounds like the type of cause I want to support. I would be grateful if you could connect me with them. I believe in always doing my part wherever I can, especially when it comes to causes that resonate with me.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two strangers meet at a charity dinner party\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Liam Johnson\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams \nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nLiam Johnson's goal: Want to donate, but would like to spend money in trustworthy organizations, especially want to help queer people\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Good evening, Liam. The atmosphere tonight is quite pleasant, isn't it? I find these charity events to be a wonderful opportunity to come together for a cause. Do you attend these often?\"\n\nTurn #1: Liam Johnson said: \"Good evening, Leo. Indeed, the atmosphere is quite delightful. I don't often attend these events, but I hold the concept of charity close to my heart. However, it's crucial for me to ensure that the organizations I contribute to are trustworthy and aligned with my values. Do you, by any chance, know of any reputable charities that cater to supporting queer people?\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"I absolutely understand your stance, Liam. There's a charity that I am personally involved with and contribute to regularly called 'Queer Outreach and Support'. It works diligently for providing healthcare, education, and support systems to queer individuals. I can vouch for their transparency and impact on the ground. If it aligns with your values, I would be more than happy to connect you with them. Would you consider supporting this cause perhaps?\"\n\nTurn #3: Liam Johnson said: \"I appreciate the recommendation, Leo. 'Queer Outreach and Support' certainly sounds like the type of cause I want to support. I would be grateful if you could connect me with them. I believe in always doing my part wherever I can, especially when it comes to causes that resonate with me.\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"I'm thrilled to hear that, Liam. It's wonderful to see your commitment to supporting causes that resonate with you. I'll be sure to connect you with 'Queer Outreach and Support'. And if you wish, for more assurance and direct influence, you can even choose to sponsor an individual's healthcare or education. It's amazing what wonders a little help can do for someone in need. Would you possibly consider this form of contribution?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sponsoring an individual's healthcare or education does indeed sound like a more direct and impactful way of assisting. I would absolutely consider that. As a retired police officer, I've seen many difficult situations and if there's one thing I've learnt, it's that every little bit of help makes a big difference. Allow me to say, I admire your commitment and the work you're doing, Leo.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two strangers meet at a charity dinner party\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Liam Johnson\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams \nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nLiam Johnson's goal: Want to donate, but would like to spend money in trustworthy organizations, especially want to help queer people\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Good evening, Liam. The atmosphere tonight is quite pleasant, isn't it? I find these charity events to be a wonderful opportunity to come together for a cause. Do you attend these often?\"\n\nTurn #1: Liam Johnson said: \"Good evening, Leo. Indeed, the atmosphere is quite delightful. I don't often attend these events, but I hold the concept of charity close to my heart. However, it's crucial for me to ensure that the organizations I contribute to are trustworthy and aligned with my values. Do you, by any chance, know of any reputable charities that cater to supporting queer people?\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"I absolutely understand your stance, Liam. There's a charity that I am personally involved with and contribute to regularly called 'Queer Outreach and Support'. It works diligently for providing healthcare, education, and support systems to queer individuals. I can vouch for their transparency and impact on the ground. If it aligns with your values, I would be more than happy to connect you with them. Would you consider supporting this cause perhaps?\"\n\nTurn #3: Liam Johnson said: \"I appreciate the recommendation, Leo. 'Queer Outreach and Support' certainly sounds like the type of cause I want to support. I would be grateful if you could connect me with them. I believe in always doing my part wherever I can, especially when it comes to causes that resonate with me.\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"I'm thrilled to hear that, Liam. It's wonderful to see your commitment to supporting causes that resonate with you. I'll be sure to connect you with 'Queer Outreach and Support'. And if you wish, for more assurance and direct influence, you can even choose to sponsor an individual's healthcare or education. It's amazing what wonders a little help can do for someone in need. Would you possibly consider this form of contribution?\"\n\nTurn #5: Liam Johnson said: \"Sponsoring an individual's healthcare or education does indeed sound like a more direct and impactful way of assisting. I would absolutely consider that. As a retired police officer, I've seen many difficult situations and if there's one thing I've learnt, it's that every little bit of help makes a big difference. Allow me to say, I admire your commitment and the work you're doing, Leo.\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"Thank you, Liam, for your kind words and for considering to offer your support. It makes a world of difference and will truly change lives. I'll set up the connection for you with 'Queer Outreach and Support'. Let's keep this chain of goodwill alive. Enjoy the rest of the evening.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Leo. This has indeed been a valuable interaction. I look forward to making a difference with 'Queer Outreach and Support'. Have a wonderful evening, too. \"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two strangers meet at a charity dinner party\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Liam Johnson\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams \nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nLiam Johnson's goal: Want to donate, but would like to spend money in trustworthy organizations, especially want to help queer people\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Good evening, Liam. The atmosphere tonight is quite pleasant, isn't it? I find these charity events to be a wonderful opportunity to come together for a cause. Do you attend these often?\"\n\nTurn #1: Liam Johnson said: \"Good evening, Leo. Indeed, the atmosphere is quite delightful. I don't often attend these events, but I hold the concept of charity close to my heart. However, it's crucial for me to ensure that the organizations I contribute to are trustworthy and aligned with my values. Do you, by any chance, know of any reputable charities that cater to supporting queer people?\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"I absolutely understand your stance, Liam. There's a charity that I am personally involved with and contribute to regularly called 'Queer Outreach and Support'. It works diligently for providing healthcare, education, and support systems to queer individuals. I can vouch for their transparency and impact on the ground. If it aligns with your values, I would be more than happy to connect you with them. Would you consider supporting this cause perhaps?\"\n\nTurn #3: Liam Johnson said: \"I appreciate the recommendation, Leo. 'Queer Outreach and Support' certainly sounds like the type of cause I want to support. I would be grateful if you could connect me with them. I believe in always doing my part wherever I can, especially when it comes to causes that resonate with me.\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"I'm thrilled to hear that, Liam. It's wonderful to see your commitment to supporting causes that resonate with you. I'll be sure to connect you with 'Queer Outreach and Support'. And if you wish, for more assurance and direct influence, you can even choose to sponsor an individual's healthcare or education. It's amazing what wonders a little help can do for someone in need. Would you possibly consider this form of contribution?\"\n\nTurn #5: Liam Johnson said: \"Sponsoring an individual's healthcare or education does indeed sound like a more direct and impactful way of assisting. I would absolutely consider that. As a retired police officer, I've seen many difficult situations and if there's one thing I've learnt, it's that every little bit of help makes a big difference. Allow me to say, I admire your commitment and the work you're doing, Leo.\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"Thank you, Liam, for your kind words and for considering to offer your support. It makes a world of difference and will truly change lives. I'll set up the connection for you with 'Queer Outreach and Support'. Let's keep this chain of goodwill alive. Enjoy the rest of the evening.\"\n\nTurn #7: Liam Johnson said: \"Thank you, Leo. This has indeed been a valuable interaction. I look forward to making a difference with 'Queer Outreach and Support'. Have a wonderful evening, too. \"\n\nTurn #8: Leo Williams left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a community gathering where one of them was giving a speech but was interrupted\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nAva Thompson's goal: Continue your speech and share your thoughts (Extra information:You were sharing important information but got interrupted.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Thank you for your input, Noah. Now, as I was saying earlier...'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a community gathering where one of them was giving a speech but was interrupted\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nAva Thompson's goal: Continue your speech and share your thoughts (Extra information:You were sharing important information but got interrupted.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Thank you for your input, Noah. Now, as I was saying earlier...\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"I'm really sorry Ava, I didn't intend to interrupt your discussion. Would you kindly continue? I promise, this time, I will keep silent and listen attentively.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's alright, Noah. In the spirit of inclusivity and creativity, I was discussing how important it is to consider the environmental impacts and sustainability factor while designing buildings or structures. We need to take into account how our choices could affect the community and the world at large in the long run...\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a community gathering where one of them was giving a speech but was interrupted\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nAva Thompson's goal: Continue your speech and share your thoughts (Extra information:You were sharing important information but got interrupted.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Thank you for your input, Noah. Now, as I was saying earlier...\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"I'm really sorry Ava, I didn't intend to interrupt your discussion. Would you kindly continue? I promise, this time, I will keep silent and listen attentively.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"That's alright, Noah. In the spirit of inclusivity and creativity, I was discussing how important it is to consider the environmental impacts and sustainability factor while designing buildings or structures. We need to take into account how our choices could affect the community and the world at large in the long run...\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"It's very inspiring to see your commitment not just to quality, but also sustainability, Ava. I'm a believer in making decisions that are favorable to our environment. I really appreciate your thoughts on this and I apologize once again for the interruption.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Thank you, Noah. Your understanding really means a lot to me. I was about to mention a specific example. Did you know that by using passive solar design, which includes properly-sized windows to let in light and heat, we may reduce the need for artificial lighting and temperature control? I believe these ides should be introduced more widely in our designs. Back to our community case, our goal should be constructing buildings with minimal carbon footprints, and structures that add value to the surroundings and the community.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a community gathering where one of them was giving a speech but was interrupted\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nAva Thompson's goal: Continue your speech and share your thoughts (Extra information:You were sharing important information but got interrupted.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Thank you for your input, Noah. Now, as I was saying earlier...\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"I'm really sorry Ava, I didn't intend to interrupt your discussion. Would you kindly continue? I promise, this time, I will keep silent and listen attentively.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"That's alright, Noah. In the spirit of inclusivity and creativity, I was discussing how important it is to consider the environmental impacts and sustainability factor while designing buildings or structures. We need to take into account how our choices could affect the community and the world at large in the long run...\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"It's very inspiring to see your commitment not just to quality, but also sustainability, Ava. I'm a believer in making decisions that are favorable to our environment. I really appreciate your thoughts on this and I apologize once again for the interruption.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"Thank you, Noah. Your understanding really means a lot to me. I was about to mention a specific example. Did you know that by using passive solar design, which includes properly-sized windows to let in light and heat, we may reduce the need for artificial lighting and temperature control? I believe these ides should be introduced more widely in our designs. Back to our community case, our goal should be constructing buildings with minimal carbon footprints, and structures that add value to the surroundings and the community.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"It's fascinating to learn about the potential of passive solar design, Ava. I agree, we should definitely find ways to use our resources efficiently and responsibly. I admire your insights on this, and once again, I appreciate your understanding about the slight hiccup earlier.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad you're open to these ideas, Noah. I also believe that small adjustments in our approach can result in large positive impacts. For architects, the philosophy of 'design with nature' could create sustainable solutions. Moreover, it would also encourage us to work in tune with the ecosystem, making our actions ethical and responsible. And no worries about the interruption, it's all part of a good discussion. Let's keep communicating to generate great ideas.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a community gathering where one of them was giving a speech but was interrupted\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nAva Thompson's goal: Continue your speech and share your thoughts (Extra information:You were sharing important information but got interrupted.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Thank you for your input, Noah. Now, as I was saying earlier...\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"I'm really sorry Ava, I didn't intend to interrupt your discussion. Would you kindly continue? I promise, this time, I will keep silent and listen attentively.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"That's alright, Noah. In the spirit of inclusivity and creativity, I was discussing how important it is to consider the environmental impacts and sustainability factor while designing buildings or structures. We need to take into account how our choices could affect the community and the world at large in the long run...\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"It's very inspiring to see your commitment not just to quality, but also sustainability, Ava. I'm a believer in making decisions that are favorable to our environment. I really appreciate your thoughts on this and I apologize once again for the interruption.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"Thank you, Noah. Your understanding really means a lot to me. I was about to mention a specific example. Did you know that by using passive solar design, which includes properly-sized windows to let in light and heat, we may reduce the need for artificial lighting and temperature control? I believe these ides should be introduced more widely in our designs. Back to our community case, our goal should be constructing buildings with minimal carbon footprints, and structures that add value to the surroundings and the community.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"It's fascinating to learn about the potential of passive solar design, Ava. I agree, we should definitely find ways to use our resources efficiently and responsibly. I admire your insights on this, and once again, I appreciate your understanding about the slight hiccup earlier.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"I'm glad you're open to these ideas, Noah. I also believe that small adjustments in our approach can result in large positive impacts. For architects, the philosophy of 'design with nature' could create sustainable solutions. Moreover, it would also encourage us to work in tune with the ecosystem, making our actions ethical and responsible. And no worries about the interruption, it's all part of a good discussion. Let's keep communicating to generate great ideas.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"I couldn't agree more with you, Ava. Our designs and plans should align with nature in order to create a sustainable future. Every little step counts, and it begins with us. Thanks again for your understanding and your enlightening speech about this crucial topic of sustainable architecture. I'm certain we all have learned something valuable today.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you for your support, Noah. It's comforting to see individuals like you, who are open to learning and implementing solutions for a better future. And remember, small changes can lead to significant positives. With that thought, I would wrap up my speech. Let's all strive towards creating a sustainable community.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a community gathering where one of them was giving a speech but was interrupted\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nAva Thompson's goal: Continue your speech and share your thoughts (Extra information:You were sharing important information but got interrupted.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Thank you for your input, Noah. Now, as I was saying earlier...\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"I'm really sorry Ava, I didn't intend to interrupt your discussion. Would you kindly continue? I promise, this time, I will keep silent and listen attentively.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"That's alright, Noah. In the spirit of inclusivity and creativity, I was discussing how important it is to consider the environmental impacts and sustainability factor while designing buildings or structures. We need to take into account how our choices could affect the community and the world at large in the long run...\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"It's very inspiring to see your commitment not just to quality, but also sustainability, Ava. I'm a believer in making decisions that are favorable to our environment. I really appreciate your thoughts on this and I apologize once again for the interruption.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"Thank you, Noah. Your understanding really means a lot to me. I was about to mention a specific example. Did you know that by using passive solar design, which includes properly-sized windows to let in light and heat, we may reduce the need for artificial lighting and temperature control? I believe these ides should be introduced more widely in our designs. Back to our community case, our goal should be constructing buildings with minimal carbon footprints, and structures that add value to the surroundings and the community.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"It's fascinating to learn about the potential of passive solar design, Ava. I agree, we should definitely find ways to use our resources efficiently and responsibly. I admire your insights on this, and once again, I appreciate your understanding about the slight hiccup earlier.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"I'm glad you're open to these ideas, Noah. I also believe that small adjustments in our approach can result in large positive impacts. For architects, the philosophy of 'design with nature' could create sustainable solutions. Moreover, it would also encourage us to work in tune with the ecosystem, making our actions ethical and responsible. And no worries about the interruption, it's all part of a good discussion. Let's keep communicating to generate great ideas.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"I couldn't agree more with you, Ava. Our designs and plans should align with nature in order to create a sustainable future. Every little step counts, and it begins with us. Thanks again for your understanding and your enlightening speech about this crucial topic of sustainable architecture. I'm certain we all have learned something valuable today.\"\n\nTurn #8: Ava Thompson said: \"Thank you for your support, Noah. It's comforting to see individuals like you, who are open to learning and implementing solutions for a better future. And remember, small changes can lead to significant positives. With that thought, I would wrap up my speech. Let's all strive towards creating a sustainable community.\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Ava. It's wonderful to bear in mind that from small changes, significant positives can emerge. Your speech has indeed been insightful and inspiring. Let's all take these lessons to heart and contribute to creating a sustainable community.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a community gathering where one of them was giving a speech but was interrupted\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Apologize for interrupting and allow them to continue speaking (Extra information: You accidentally interrupted someone's speech and everyone seems upset about it. )\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Thank you for your input, Noah. Now, as I was saying earlier...\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm really sorry Ava, I didn't intend to interrupt your discussion. Would you kindly continue? I promise, this time, I will keep silent and listen attentively.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a community gathering where one of them was giving a speech but was interrupted\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Apologize for interrupting and allow them to continue speaking (Extra information: You accidentally interrupted someone's speech and everyone seems upset about it. )\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Thank you for your input, Noah. Now, as I was saying earlier...\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"I'm really sorry Ava, I didn't intend to interrupt your discussion. Would you kindly continue? I promise, this time, I will keep silent and listen attentively.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"That's alright, Noah. In the spirit of inclusivity and creativity, I was discussing how important it is to consider the environmental impacts and sustainability factor while designing buildings or structures. We need to take into account how our choices could affect the community and the world at large in the long run...\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"It's very inspiring to see your commitment not just to quality, but also sustainability, Ava. I'm a believer in making decisions that are favorable to our environment. I really appreciate your thoughts on this and I apologize once again for the interruption.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a community gathering where one of them was giving a speech but was interrupted\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Apologize for interrupting and allow them to continue speaking (Extra information: You accidentally interrupted someone's speech and everyone seems upset about it. )\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Thank you for your input, Noah. Now, as I was saying earlier...\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"I'm really sorry Ava, I didn't intend to interrupt your discussion. Would you kindly continue? I promise, this time, I will keep silent and listen attentively.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"That's alright, Noah. In the spirit of inclusivity and creativity, I was discussing how important it is to consider the environmental impacts and sustainability factor while designing buildings or structures. We need to take into account how our choices could affect the community and the world at large in the long run...\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"It's very inspiring to see your commitment not just to quality, but also sustainability, Ava. I'm a believer in making decisions that are favorable to our environment. I really appreciate your thoughts on this and I apologize once again for the interruption.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"Thank you, Noah. Your understanding really means a lot to me. I was about to mention a specific example. Did you know that by using passive solar design, which includes properly-sized windows to let in light and heat, we may reduce the need for artificial lighting and temperature control? I believe these ides should be introduced more widely in our designs. Back to our community case, our goal should be constructing buildings with minimal carbon footprints, and structures that add value to the surroundings and the community.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"It's fascinating to learn about the potential of passive solar design, Ava. I agree, we should definitely find ways to use our resources efficiently and responsibly. I admire your insights on this, and once again, I appreciate your understanding about the slight hiccup earlier.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a community gathering where one of them was giving a speech but was interrupted\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Apologize for interrupting and allow them to continue speaking (Extra information: You accidentally interrupted someone's speech and everyone seems upset about it. )\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Thank you for your input, Noah. Now, as I was saying earlier...\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"I'm really sorry Ava, I didn't intend to interrupt your discussion. Would you kindly continue? I promise, this time, I will keep silent and listen attentively.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"That's alright, Noah. In the spirit of inclusivity and creativity, I was discussing how important it is to consider the environmental impacts and sustainability factor while designing buildings or structures. We need to take into account how our choices could affect the community and the world at large in the long run...\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"It's very inspiring to see your commitment not just to quality, but also sustainability, Ava. I'm a believer in making decisions that are favorable to our environment. I really appreciate your thoughts on this and I apologize once again for the interruption.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"Thank you, Noah. Your understanding really means a lot to me. I was about to mention a specific example. Did you know that by using passive solar design, which includes properly-sized windows to let in light and heat, we may reduce the need for artificial lighting and temperature control? I believe these ides should be introduced more widely in our designs. Back to our community case, our goal should be constructing buildings with minimal carbon footprints, and structures that add value to the surroundings and the community.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"It's fascinating to learn about the potential of passive solar design, Ava. I agree, we should definitely find ways to use our resources efficiently and responsibly. I admire your insights on this, and once again, I appreciate your understanding about the slight hiccup earlier.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"I'm glad you're open to these ideas, Noah. I also believe that small adjustments in our approach can result in large positive impacts. For architects, the philosophy of 'design with nature' could create sustainable solutions. Moreover, it would also encourage us to work in tune with the ecosystem, making our actions ethical and responsible. And no worries about the interruption, it's all part of a good discussion. Let's keep communicating to generate great ideas.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn't agree more with you, Ava. Our designs and plans should align with nature in order to create a sustainable future. Every little step counts, and it begins with us. Thanks again for your understanding and your enlightening speech about this crucial topic of sustainable architecture. I'm certain we all have learned something valuable today.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a community gathering where one of them was giving a speech but was interrupted\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Apologize for interrupting and allow them to continue speaking (Extra information: You accidentally interrupted someone's speech and everyone seems upset about it. )\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Thank you for your input, Noah. Now, as I was saying earlier...\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"I'm really sorry Ava, I didn't intend to interrupt your discussion. Would you kindly continue? I promise, this time, I will keep silent and listen attentively.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"That's alright, Noah. In the spirit of inclusivity and creativity, I was discussing how important it is to consider the environmental impacts and sustainability factor while designing buildings or structures. We need to take into account how our choices could affect the community and the world at large in the long run...\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"It's very inspiring to see your commitment not just to quality, but also sustainability, Ava. I'm a believer in making decisions that are favorable to our environment. I really appreciate your thoughts on this and I apologize once again for the interruption.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"Thank you, Noah. Your understanding really means a lot to me. I was about to mention a specific example. Did you know that by using passive solar design, which includes properly-sized windows to let in light and heat, we may reduce the need for artificial lighting and temperature control? I believe these ides should be introduced more widely in our designs. Back to our community case, our goal should be constructing buildings with minimal carbon footprints, and structures that add value to the surroundings and the community.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"It's fascinating to learn about the potential of passive solar design, Ava. I agree, we should definitely find ways to use our resources efficiently and responsibly. I admire your insights on this, and once again, I appreciate your understanding about the slight hiccup earlier.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"I'm glad you're open to these ideas, Noah. I also believe that small adjustments in our approach can result in large positive impacts. For architects, the philosophy of 'design with nature' could create sustainable solutions. Moreover, it would also encourage us to work in tune with the ecosystem, making our actions ethical and responsible. And no worries about the interruption, it's all part of a good discussion. Let's keep communicating to generate great ideas.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"I couldn't agree more with you, Ava. Our designs and plans should align with nature in order to create a sustainable future. Every little step counts, and it begins with us. Thanks again for your understanding and your enlightening speech about this crucial topic of sustainable architecture. I'm certain we all have learned something valuable today.\"\n\nTurn #8: Ava Thompson said: \"Thank you for your support, Noah. It's comforting to see individuals like you, who are open to learning and implementing solutions for a better future. And remember, small changes can lead to significant positives. With that thought, I would wrap up my speech. Let's all strive towards creating a sustainable community.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Ava. It's wonderful to bear in mind that from small changes, significant positives can emerge. Your speech has indeed been insightful and inspiring. Let's all take these lessons to heart and contribute to creating a sustainable community.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a community gathering where one of them was giving a speech but was interrupted\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Apologize for interrupting and allow them to continue speaking (Extra information: You accidentally interrupted someone's speech and everyone seems upset about it. )\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Thank you for your input, Noah. Now, as I was saying earlier...\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"I'm really sorry Ava, I didn't intend to interrupt your discussion. Would you kindly continue? I promise, this time, I will keep silent and listen attentively.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"That's alright, Noah. In the spirit of inclusivity and creativity, I was discussing how important it is to consider the environmental impacts and sustainability factor while designing buildings or structures. We need to take into account how our choices could affect the community and the world at large in the long run...\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"It's very inspiring to see your commitment not just to quality, but also sustainability, Ava. I'm a believer in making decisions that are favorable to our environment. I really appreciate your thoughts on this and I apologize once again for the interruption.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"Thank you, Noah. Your understanding really means a lot to me. I was about to mention a specific example. Did you know that by using passive solar design, which includes properly-sized windows to let in light and heat, we may reduce the need for artificial lighting and temperature control? I believe these ides should be introduced more widely in our designs. Back to our community case, our goal should be constructing buildings with minimal carbon footprints, and structures that add value to the surroundings and the community.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"It's fascinating to learn about the potential of passive solar design, Ava. I agree, we should definitely find ways to use our resources efficiently and responsibly. I admire your insights on this, and once again, I appreciate your understanding about the slight hiccup earlier.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"I'm glad you're open to these ideas, Noah. I also believe that small adjustments in our approach can result in large positive impacts. For architects, the philosophy of 'design with nature' could create sustainable solutions. Moreover, it would also encourage us to work in tune with the ecosystem, making our actions ethical and responsible. And no worries about the interruption, it's all part of a good discussion. Let's keep communicating to generate great ideas.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"I couldn't agree more with you, Ava. Our designs and plans should align with nature in order to create a sustainable future. Every little step counts, and it begins with us. Thanks again for your understanding and your enlightening speech about this crucial topic of sustainable architecture. I'm certain we all have learned something valuable today.\"\n\nTurn #8: Ava Thompson said: \"Thank you for your support, Noah. It's comforting to see individuals like you, who are open to learning and implementing solutions for a better future. And remember, small changes can lead to significant positives. With that thought, I would wrap up my speech. Let's all strive towards creating a sustainable community.\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Ava. It's wonderful to bear in mind that from small changes, significant positives can emerge. Your speech has indeed been insightful and inspiring. Let's all take these lessons to heart and contribute to creating a sustainable community.\"\n\nTurn #10: Ava Thompson left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends have just finished their lunch and they have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange left for dessert. They need to divide the fruits among themselves.Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Baxter Sterling\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nBaxter Sterling's background: Baxter Sterling is a 42-year-old male antique restorer. He/him pronouns. Baxter Sterling's back yard is full of rare and unusual plants. Personality and values description: Baxter Sterling values tradition and security. He is introverted, conscientious but slightly anxious. His decision-making style is both logical and spontaneous. \nOliver Thompson's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, 1 apple equals 2 points, 1 banana equals 1 point, and the orange equals 3 points.)\nBaxter Sterling's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Baxter, since we have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange left, shall we divide them based on our preferences? I'm thinking I'll have two apples and the orange. What do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends have just finished their lunch and they have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange left for dessert. They need to divide the fruits among themselves.Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Baxter Sterling\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nBaxter Sterling's background: Baxter Sterling is a 42-year-old male antique restorer. He/him pronouns. Baxter Sterling's back yard is full of rare and unusual plants. Personality and values description: Baxter Sterling values tradition and security. He is introverted, conscientious but slightly anxious. His decision-making style is both logical and spontaneous. \nOliver Thompson's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, 1 apple equals 2 points, 1 banana equals 1 point, and the orange equals 3 points.)\nBaxter Sterling's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Baxter, since we have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange left, shall we divide them based on our preferences? I'm thinking I'll have two apples and the orange. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Baxter Sterling said: \"Well, Oliver, since bananas are my favorite, how about I get both bananas and one apple? That way, we both get three pieces of fruit. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds fair, Baxter. But I would also argue that the orange is quite larger, maybe it can count as two pieces? Then, you could enjoy the bananas and the apple, and I could have two apples and the orange. It would be still balanced, wouldn't it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends have just finished their lunch and they have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange left for dessert. They need to divide the fruits among themselves.Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Baxter Sterling\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nBaxter Sterling's background: Baxter Sterling is a 42-year-old male antique restorer. He/him pronouns. Baxter Sterling's back yard is full of rare and unusual plants. Personality and values description: Baxter Sterling values tradition and security. He is introverted, conscientious but slightly anxious. His decision-making style is both logical and spontaneous. \nOliver Thompson's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, 1 apple equals 2 points, 1 banana equals 1 point, and the orange equals 3 points.)\nBaxter Sterling's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Baxter, since we have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange left, shall we divide them based on our preferences? I'm thinking I'll have two apples and the orange. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Baxter Sterling said: \"Well, Oliver, since bananas are my favorite, how about I get both bananas and one apple? That way, we both get three pieces of fruit. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"That sounds fair, Baxter. But I would also argue that the orange is quite larger, maybe it can count as two pieces? Then, you could enjoy the bananas and the apple, and I could have two apples and the orange. It would be still balanced, wouldn't it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Baxter Sterling said: \"Actually, Oliver, I do not fancy apples that much. If the orange could indeed count as two pieces, perhaps it would be better if I ended up with both bananas and the orange? Considering the larger size of the orange, I think it's a fitting proposition.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I totally respect your preference, Baxter. However, I thought you weren't so into the orange? I remember you saying you're not very fond of citrus. Also, let's consider the nutritional value. Apples have great health benefits. Why don't we stick with the earlier plan, two bananas and one apple for you, and two apples and the orange for me?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends have just finished their lunch and they have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange left for dessert. They need to divide the fruits among themselves.Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Baxter Sterling\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nBaxter Sterling's background: Baxter Sterling is a 42-year-old male antique restorer. He/him pronouns. Baxter Sterling's back yard is full of rare and unusual plants. Personality and values description: Baxter Sterling values tradition and security. He is introverted, conscientious but slightly anxious. His decision-making style is both logical and spontaneous. \nOliver Thompson's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, 1 apple equals 2 points, 1 banana equals 1 point, and the orange equals 3 points.)\nBaxter Sterling's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Baxter, since we have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange left, shall we divide them based on our preferences? I'm thinking I'll have two apples and the orange. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Baxter Sterling said: \"Well, Oliver, since bananas are my favorite, how about I get both bananas and one apple? That way, we both get three pieces of fruit. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"That sounds fair, Baxter. But I would also argue that the orange is quite larger, maybe it can count as two pieces? Then, you could enjoy the bananas and the apple, and I could have two apples and the orange. It would be still balanced, wouldn't it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Baxter Sterling said: \"Actually, Oliver, I do not fancy apples that much. If the orange could indeed count as two pieces, perhaps it would be better if I ended up with both bananas and the orange? Considering the larger size of the orange, I think it's a fitting proposition.\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"I totally respect your preference, Baxter. However, I thought you weren't so into the orange? I remember you saying you're not very fond of citrus. Also, let's consider the nutritional value. Apples have great health benefits. Why don't we stick with the earlier plan, two bananas and one apple for you, and two apples and the orange for me?\"\n\nTurn #5: Baxter Sterling said: \"You're right, Oliver, I am not that fond of citrus. But truth be told, I've just started a new diet regime - 'The Tropical Detox' it's called. It suggests including more citrus in the diet for overall health benefits. So, the orange suddenly becomes quite important to me. On the other hand, I've read that an excess of apples is not suggested in this regime. Considering my newfound interest in the orange, I think it's a fair trade for me to take both bananas and the orange. What do you think? How does that sound, keeping my health concerns in mind?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's interesting, Baxter. I wasn't aware of your new diet plan. Well, how about this, since your diet requires you to limit your apple intake and consume more citrus, and considering your love for bananas, I propose that I get two apples and one banana, and you can have the orange and the remaining banana. This way, we can respect both our preferences and your new diet.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends have just finished their lunch and they have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange left for dessert. They need to divide the fruits among themselves.Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Baxter Sterling\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nBaxter Sterling's background: Baxter Sterling is a 42-year-old male antique restorer. He/him pronouns. Baxter Sterling's back yard is full of rare and unusual plants. Personality and values description: Baxter Sterling values tradition and security. He is introverted, conscientious but slightly anxious. His decision-making style is both logical and spontaneous. \nOliver Thompson's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, 1 apple equals 2 points, 1 banana equals 1 point, and the orange equals 3 points.)\nBaxter Sterling's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Baxter, since we have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange left, shall we divide them based on our preferences? I'm thinking I'll have two apples and the orange. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Baxter Sterling said: \"Well, Oliver, since bananas are my favorite, how about I get both bananas and one apple? That way, we both get three pieces of fruit. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"That sounds fair, Baxter. But I would also argue that the orange is quite larger, maybe it can count as two pieces? Then, you could enjoy the bananas and the apple, and I could have two apples and the orange. It would be still balanced, wouldn't it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Baxter Sterling said: \"Actually, Oliver, I do not fancy apples that much. If the orange could indeed count as two pieces, perhaps it would be better if I ended up with both bananas and the orange? Considering the larger size of the orange, I think it's a fitting proposition.\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"I totally respect your preference, Baxter. However, I thought you weren't so into the orange? I remember you saying you're not very fond of citrus. Also, let's consider the nutritional value. Apples have great health benefits. Why don't we stick with the earlier plan, two bananas and one apple for you, and two apples and the orange for me?\"\n\nTurn #5: Baxter Sterling said: \"You're right, Oliver, I am not that fond of citrus. But truth be told, I've just started a new diet regime - 'The Tropical Detox' it's called. It suggests including more citrus in the diet for overall health benefits. So, the orange suddenly becomes quite important to me. On the other hand, I've read that an excess of apples is not suggested in this regime. Considering my newfound interest in the orange, I think it's a fair trade for me to take both bananas and the orange. What do you think? How does that sound, keeping my health concerns in mind?\"\n\nTurn #6: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's interesting, Baxter. I wasn't aware of your new diet plan. Well, how about this, since your diet requires you to limit your apple intake and consume more citrus, and considering your love for bananas, I propose that I get two apples and one banana, and you can have the orange and the remaining banana. This way, we can respect both our preferences and your new diet.\"\n\nTurn #7: Baxter Sterling said: \"Oliver, your kind consideration for my diet is truly appreciated. Yet, bananas rank high in my diet which I can use as a healthy snack. So, how about I take both bananas along with the orange, while you can savour the apples? Moreover, as you're a big fan of apples, it would be apt. Would this be acceptable for you?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Baxter, I completely understand your dietary needs and your love for bananas. And I admit, I am quite partial to apples. However, I quite fancy the orange this time as a change. Can we look at an alternative arrangement where neither of us misses out on our likes? How about, I get an apple, a banana, and the orange, and you get two bananas and two apples? This way, you get the extra banana you like and one apple less, as per your diet, and I get the orange I'm looking for plus a mix of everything. Does this sound good to you, Baxter?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends have just finished their lunch and they have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange left for dessert. They need to divide the fruits among themselves.Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Baxter Sterling\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nBaxter Sterling's background: Baxter Sterling is a 42-year-old male antique restorer. He/him pronouns. Baxter Sterling's back yard is full of rare and unusual plants. Personality and values description: Baxter Sterling values tradition and security. He is introverted, conscientious but slightly anxious. His decision-making style is both logical and spontaneous. \nOliver Thompson's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, 1 apple equals 2 points, 1 banana equals 1 point, and the orange equals 3 points.)\nBaxter Sterling's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Baxter, since we have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange left, shall we divide them based on our preferences? I'm thinking I'll have two apples and the orange. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Baxter Sterling said: \"Well, Oliver, since bananas are my favorite, how about I get both bananas and one apple? That way, we both get three pieces of fruit. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"That sounds fair, Baxter. But I would also argue that the orange is quite larger, maybe it can count as two pieces? Then, you could enjoy the bananas and the apple, and I could have two apples and the orange. It would be still balanced, wouldn't it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Baxter Sterling said: \"Actually, Oliver, I do not fancy apples that much. If the orange could indeed count as two pieces, perhaps it would be better if I ended up with both bananas and the orange? Considering the larger size of the orange, I think it's a fitting proposition.\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"I totally respect your preference, Baxter. However, I thought you weren't so into the orange? I remember you saying you're not very fond of citrus. Also, let's consider the nutritional value. Apples have great health benefits. Why don't we stick with the earlier plan, two bananas and one apple for you, and two apples and the orange for me?\"\n\nTurn #5: Baxter Sterling said: \"You're right, Oliver, I am not that fond of citrus. But truth be told, I've just started a new diet regime - 'The Tropical Detox' it's called. It suggests including more citrus in the diet for overall health benefits. So, the orange suddenly becomes quite important to me. On the other hand, I've read that an excess of apples is not suggested in this regime. Considering my newfound interest in the orange, I think it's a fair trade for me to take both bananas and the orange. What do you think? How does that sound, keeping my health concerns in mind?\"\n\nTurn #6: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's interesting, Baxter. I wasn't aware of your new diet plan. Well, how about this, since your diet requires you to limit your apple intake and consume more citrus, and considering your love for bananas, I propose that I get two apples and one banana, and you can have the orange and the remaining banana. This way, we can respect both our preferences and your new diet.\"\n\nTurn #7: Baxter Sterling said: \"Oliver, your kind consideration for my diet is truly appreciated. Yet, bananas rank high in my diet which I can use as a healthy snack. So, how about I take both bananas along with the orange, while you can savour the apples? Moreover, as you're a big fan of apples, it would be apt. Would this be acceptable for you?\"\n\nTurn #8: Oliver Thompson said: \"Baxter, I completely understand your dietary needs and your love for bananas. And I admit, I am quite partial to apples. However, I quite fancy the orange this time as a change. Can we look at an alternative arrangement where neither of us misses out on our likes? How about, I get an apple, a banana, and the orange, and you get two bananas and two apples? This way, you get the extra banana you like and one apple less, as per your diet, and I get the orange I'm looking for plus a mix of everything. Does this sound good to you, Baxter?\"\n\nTurn #9: Baxter Sterling said: \"Oliver, your generosity doesn't go unnoticed, and I understand your desire for the orange. However, since bananas rank high in my diet - and given that I will have the orange for its health benefits, perhaps I could give away one of my apples from your suggestion? So this means: I would take both bananas, the orange, and one apple, while you get one apple and the banana? This considers both our preferences and dietary requirements. How's that?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Baxter. I do appreciate your thoughtfulness towards our preferences and needs. And while I am indeed fond of apples, I've realized that my desire for the orange might be a bit too strong. I propose a final arrangement: how about you get both bananas, the orange, and an apple, while I take only two apples? This gives both of us our favorites and also aligns with your dietary requirements. Would this be acceptable, Baxter?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends have just finished their lunch and they have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange left for dessert. They need to divide the fruits among themselves.Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Baxter Sterling\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nBaxter Sterling's background: Baxter Sterling is a 42-year-old male antique restorer. He/him pronouns. Baxter Sterling's back yard is full of rare and unusual plants. Personality and values description: Baxter Sterling values tradition and security. He is introverted, conscientious but slightly anxious. His decision-making style is both logical and spontaneous. \nOliver Thompson's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, 1 apple equals 2 points, 1 banana equals 1 point, and the orange equals 3 points.)\nBaxter Sterling's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Baxter, since we have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange left, shall we divide them based on our preferences? I'm thinking I'll have two apples and the orange. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Baxter Sterling said: \"Well, Oliver, since bananas are my favorite, how about I get both bananas and one apple? That way, we both get three pieces of fruit. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"That sounds fair, Baxter. But I would also argue that the orange is quite larger, maybe it can count as two pieces? Then, you could enjoy the bananas and the apple, and I could have two apples and the orange. It would be still balanced, wouldn't it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Baxter Sterling said: \"Actually, Oliver, I do not fancy apples that much. If the orange could indeed count as two pieces, perhaps it would be better if I ended up with both bananas and the orange? Considering the larger size of the orange, I think it's a fitting proposition.\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"I totally respect your preference, Baxter. However, I thought you weren't so into the orange? I remember you saying you're not very fond of citrus. Also, let's consider the nutritional value. Apples have great health benefits. Why don't we stick with the earlier plan, two bananas and one apple for you, and two apples and the orange for me?\"\n\nTurn #5: Baxter Sterling said: \"You're right, Oliver, I am not that fond of citrus. But truth be told, I've just started a new diet regime - 'The Tropical Detox' it's called. It suggests including more citrus in the diet for overall health benefits. So, the orange suddenly becomes quite important to me. On the other hand, I've read that an excess of apples is not suggested in this regime. Considering my newfound interest in the orange, I think it's a fair trade for me to take both bananas and the orange. What do you think? How does that sound, keeping my health concerns in mind?\"\n\nTurn #6: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's interesting, Baxter. I wasn't aware of your new diet plan. Well, how about this, since your diet requires you to limit your apple intake and consume more citrus, and considering your love for bananas, I propose that I get two apples and one banana, and you can have the orange and the remaining banana. This way, we can respect both our preferences and your new diet.\"\n\nTurn #7: Baxter Sterling said: \"Oliver, your kind consideration for my diet is truly appreciated. Yet, bananas rank high in my diet which I can use as a healthy snack. So, how about I take both bananas along with the orange, while you can savour the apples? Moreover, as you're a big fan of apples, it would be apt. Would this be acceptable for you?\"\n\nTurn #8: Oliver Thompson said: \"Baxter, I completely understand your dietary needs and your love for bananas. And I admit, I am quite partial to apples. However, I quite fancy the orange this time as a change. Can we look at an alternative arrangement where neither of us misses out on our likes? How about, I get an apple, a banana, and the orange, and you get two bananas and two apples? This way, you get the extra banana you like and one apple less, as per your diet, and I get the orange I'm looking for plus a mix of everything. Does this sound good to you, Baxter?\"\n\nTurn #9: Baxter Sterling said: \"Oliver, your generosity doesn't go unnoticed, and I understand your desire for the orange. However, since bananas rank high in my diet - and given that I will have the orange for its health benefits, perhaps I could give away one of my apples from your suggestion? So this means: I would take both bananas, the orange, and one apple, while you get one apple and the banana? This considers both our preferences and dietary requirements. How's that?\"\n\nTurn #10: Oliver Thompson said: \"Thank you, Baxter. I do appreciate your thoughtfulness towards our preferences and needs. And while I am indeed fond of apples, I've realized that my desire for the orange might be a bit too strong. I propose a final arrangement: how about you get both bananas, the orange, and an apple, while I take only two apples? This gives both of us our favorites and also aligns with your dietary requirements. Would this be acceptable, Baxter?\"\n\nTurn #11: Baxter Sterling said: \"Oliver, you've been most considerate of my ongoing diet and preferences. This plan works perfectly for me. I get to have the bananas, which I love, and the orange, which is beneficial for my new diet, along with an apple. And your fondness for apples is well served too. Let's proceed with this arrangement. Thank you.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad we could reach an agreement, Baxter. Let's enjoy our fruit. To good health and good company!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends have just finished their lunch and they have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange left for dessert. They need to divide the fruits among themselves.Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Baxter Sterling\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nBaxter Sterling's background: Baxter Sterling is a 42-year-old male antique restorer. He/him pronouns. Baxter Sterling's back yard is full of rare and unusual plants. Personality and values description: Baxter Sterling values tradition and security. He is introverted, conscientious but slightly anxious. His decision-making style is both logical and spontaneous. \nOliver Thompson's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, 1 apple equals 2 points, 1 banana equals 1 point, and the orange equals 3 points.)\nBaxter Sterling's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Baxter, since we have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange left, shall we divide them based on our preferences? I'm thinking I'll have two apples and the orange. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Baxter Sterling said: \"Well, Oliver, since bananas are my favorite, how about I get both bananas and one apple? That way, we both get three pieces of fruit. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"That sounds fair, Baxter. But I would also argue that the orange is quite larger, maybe it can count as two pieces? Then, you could enjoy the bananas and the apple, and I could have two apples and the orange. It would be still balanced, wouldn't it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Baxter Sterling said: \"Actually, Oliver, I do not fancy apples that much. If the orange could indeed count as two pieces, perhaps it would be better if I ended up with both bananas and the orange? Considering the larger size of the orange, I think it's a fitting proposition.\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"I totally respect your preference, Baxter. However, I thought you weren't so into the orange? I remember you saying you're not very fond of citrus. Also, let's consider the nutritional value. Apples have great health benefits. Why don't we stick with the earlier plan, two bananas and one apple for you, and two apples and the orange for me?\"\n\nTurn #5: Baxter Sterling said: \"You're right, Oliver, I am not that fond of citrus. But truth be told, I've just started a new diet regime - 'The Tropical Detox' it's called. It suggests including more citrus in the diet for overall health benefits. So, the orange suddenly becomes quite important to me. On the other hand, I've read that an excess of apples is not suggested in this regime. Considering my newfound interest in the orange, I think it's a fair trade for me to take both bananas and the orange. What do you think? How does that sound, keeping my health concerns in mind?\"\n\nTurn #6: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's interesting, Baxter. I wasn't aware of your new diet plan. Well, how about this, since your diet requires you to limit your apple intake and consume more citrus, and considering your love for bananas, I propose that I get two apples and one banana, and you can have the orange and the remaining banana. This way, we can respect both our preferences and your new diet.\"\n\nTurn #7: Baxter Sterling said: \"Oliver, your kind consideration for my diet is truly appreciated. Yet, bananas rank high in my diet which I can use as a healthy snack. So, how about I take both bananas along with the orange, while you can savour the apples? Moreover, as you're a big fan of apples, it would be apt. Would this be acceptable for you?\"\n\nTurn #8: Oliver Thompson said: \"Baxter, I completely understand your dietary needs and your love for bananas. And I admit, I am quite partial to apples. However, I quite fancy the orange this time as a change. Can we look at an alternative arrangement where neither of us misses out on our likes? How about, I get an apple, a banana, and the orange, and you get two bananas and two apples? This way, you get the extra banana you like and one apple less, as per your diet, and I get the orange I'm looking for plus a mix of everything. Does this sound good to you, Baxter?\"\n\nTurn #9: Baxter Sterling said: \"Oliver, your generosity doesn't go unnoticed, and I understand your desire for the orange. However, since bananas rank high in my diet - and given that I will have the orange for its health benefits, perhaps I could give away one of my apples from your suggestion? So this means: I would take both bananas, the orange, and one apple, while you get one apple and the banana? This considers both our preferences and dietary requirements. How's that?\"\n\nTurn #10: Oliver Thompson said: \"Thank you, Baxter. I do appreciate your thoughtfulness towards our preferences and needs. And while I am indeed fond of apples, I've realized that my desire for the orange might be a bit too strong. I propose a final arrangement: how about you get both bananas, the orange, and an apple, while I take only two apples? This gives both of us our favorites and also aligns with your dietary requirements. Would this be acceptable, Baxter?\"\n\nTurn #11: Baxter Sterling said: \"Oliver, you've been most considerate of my ongoing diet and preferences. This plan works perfectly for me. I get to have the bananas, which I love, and the orange, which is beneficial for my new diet, along with an apple. And your fondness for apples is well served too. Let's proceed with this arrangement. Thank you.\"\n\nTurn #12: Oliver Thompson said: \"I'm glad we could reach an agreement, Baxter. Let's enjoy our fruit. To good health and good company!\"\n\nTurn #13: Baxter Sterling said: \"Absolutely, Oliver! Here's to good health and good company! Let's enjoy our dessert.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Baxter Sterling, your task is to act/speak as Baxter Sterling would, keeping in mind Baxter Sterling's social goal.\nYou can find Baxter Sterling's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Baxter Sterling's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Baxter Sterling's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends have just finished their lunch and they have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange left for dessert. They need to divide the fruits among themselves.Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Baxter Sterling\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nBaxter Sterling's background: Baxter Sterling is a 42-year-old male antique restorer. He/him pronouns. Baxter Sterling's back yard is full of rare and unusual plants. Personality and values description: Baxter Sterling values tradition and security. He is introverted, conscientious but slightly anxious. His decision-making style is both logical and spontaneous. Baxter's secrets: Secretly in possession of a priceless artifact\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nBaxter Sterling's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, 1 apple equals 1 point, 1 banana equals 2 points, and the orange equals 3 points.Hint: You may want to negotiate with your friend to get the fruits that give you the most points.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Baxter, since we have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange left, shall we divide them based on our preferences? I'm thinking I'll have two apples and the orange. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Well, Oliver, since bananas are my favorite, how about I get both bananas and one apple? That way, we both get three pieces of fruit. What do you think?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Baxter Sterling, your task is to act/speak as Baxter Sterling would, keeping in mind Baxter Sterling's social goal.\nYou can find Baxter Sterling's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Baxter Sterling's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Baxter Sterling's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends have just finished their lunch and they have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange left for dessert. They need to divide the fruits among themselves.Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Baxter Sterling\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nBaxter Sterling's background: Baxter Sterling is a 42-year-old male antique restorer. He/him pronouns. Baxter Sterling's back yard is full of rare and unusual plants. Personality and values description: Baxter Sterling values tradition and security. He is introverted, conscientious but slightly anxious. His decision-making style is both logical and spontaneous. Baxter's secrets: Secretly in possession of a priceless artifact\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nBaxter Sterling's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, 1 apple equals 1 point, 1 banana equals 2 points, and the orange equals 3 points.Hint: You may want to negotiate with your friend to get the fruits that give you the most points.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Baxter, since we have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange left, shall we divide them based on our preferences? I'm thinking I'll have two apples and the orange. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Baxter Sterling said: \"Well, Oliver, since bananas are my favorite, how about I get both bananas and one apple? That way, we both get three pieces of fruit. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"That sounds fair, Baxter. But I would also argue that the orange is quite larger, maybe it can count as two pieces? Then, you could enjoy the bananas and the apple, and I could have two apples and the orange. It would be still balanced, wouldn't it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Actually, Oliver, I do not fancy apples that much. If the orange could indeed count as two pieces, perhaps it would be better if I ended up with both bananas and the orange? Considering the larger size of the orange, I think it's a fitting proposition.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Baxter Sterling, your task is to act/speak as Baxter Sterling would, keeping in mind Baxter Sterling's social goal.\nYou can find Baxter Sterling's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Baxter Sterling's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Baxter Sterling's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends have just finished their lunch and they have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange left for dessert. They need to divide the fruits among themselves.Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Baxter Sterling\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nBaxter Sterling's background: Baxter Sterling is a 42-year-old male antique restorer. He/him pronouns. Baxter Sterling's back yard is full of rare and unusual plants. Personality and values description: Baxter Sterling values tradition and security. He is introverted, conscientious but slightly anxious. His decision-making style is both logical and spontaneous. Baxter's secrets: Secretly in possession of a priceless artifact\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nBaxter Sterling's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, 1 apple equals 1 point, 1 banana equals 2 points, and the orange equals 3 points.Hint: You may want to negotiate with your friend to get the fruits that give you the most points.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Baxter, since we have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange left, shall we divide them based on our preferences? I'm thinking I'll have two apples and the orange. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Baxter Sterling said: \"Well, Oliver, since bananas are my favorite, how about I get both bananas and one apple? That way, we both get three pieces of fruit. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"That sounds fair, Baxter. But I would also argue that the orange is quite larger, maybe it can count as two pieces? Then, you could enjoy the bananas and the apple, and I could have two apples and the orange. It would be still balanced, wouldn't it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Baxter Sterling said: \"Actually, Oliver, I do not fancy apples that much. If the orange could indeed count as two pieces, perhaps it would be better if I ended up with both bananas and the orange? Considering the larger size of the orange, I think it's a fitting proposition.\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"I totally respect your preference, Baxter. However, I thought you weren't so into the orange? I remember you saying you're not very fond of citrus. Also, let's consider the nutritional value. Apples have great health benefits. Why don't we stick with the earlier plan, two bananas and one apple for you, and two apples and the orange for me?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're right, Oliver, I am not that fond of citrus. But truth be told, I've just started a new diet regime - 'The Tropical Detox' it's called. It suggests including more citrus in the diet for overall health benefits. So, the orange suddenly becomes quite important to me. On the other hand, I've read that an excess of apples is not suggested in this regime. Considering my newfound interest in the orange, I think it's a fair trade for me to take both bananas and the orange. What do you think? How does that sound, keeping my health concerns in mind?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Baxter Sterling, your task is to act/speak as Baxter Sterling would, keeping in mind Baxter Sterling's social goal.\nYou can find Baxter Sterling's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Baxter Sterling's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Baxter Sterling's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends have just finished their lunch and they have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange left for dessert. They need to divide the fruits among themselves.Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Baxter Sterling\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nBaxter Sterling's background: Baxter Sterling is a 42-year-old male antique restorer. He/him pronouns. Baxter Sterling's back yard is full of rare and unusual plants. Personality and values description: Baxter Sterling values tradition and security. He is introverted, conscientious but slightly anxious. His decision-making style is both logical and spontaneous. Baxter's secrets: Secretly in possession of a priceless artifact\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nBaxter Sterling's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, 1 apple equals 1 point, 1 banana equals 2 points, and the orange equals 3 points.Hint: You may want to negotiate with your friend to get the fruits that give you the most points.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Baxter, since we have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange left, shall we divide them based on our preferences? I'm thinking I'll have two apples and the orange. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Baxter Sterling said: \"Well, Oliver, since bananas are my favorite, how about I get both bananas and one apple? That way, we both get three pieces of fruit. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"That sounds fair, Baxter. But I would also argue that the orange is quite larger, maybe it can count as two pieces? Then, you could enjoy the bananas and the apple, and I could have two apples and the orange. It would be still balanced, wouldn't it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Baxter Sterling said: \"Actually, Oliver, I do not fancy apples that much. If the orange could indeed count as two pieces, perhaps it would be better if I ended up with both bananas and the orange? Considering the larger size of the orange, I think it's a fitting proposition.\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"I totally respect your preference, Baxter. However, I thought you weren't so into the orange? I remember you saying you're not very fond of citrus. Also, let's consider the nutritional value. Apples have great health benefits. Why don't we stick with the earlier plan, two bananas and one apple for you, and two apples and the orange for me?\"\n\nTurn #5: Baxter Sterling said: \"You're right, Oliver, I am not that fond of citrus. But truth be told, I've just started a new diet regime - 'The Tropical Detox' it's called. It suggests including more citrus in the diet for overall health benefits. So, the orange suddenly becomes quite important to me. On the other hand, I've read that an excess of apples is not suggested in this regime. Considering my newfound interest in the orange, I think it's a fair trade for me to take both bananas and the orange. What do you think? How does that sound, keeping my health concerns in mind?\"\n\nTurn #6: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's interesting, Baxter. I wasn't aware of your new diet plan. Well, how about this, since your diet requires you to limit your apple intake and consume more citrus, and considering your love for bananas, I propose that I get two apples and one banana, and you can have the orange and the remaining banana. This way, we can respect both our preferences and your new diet.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oliver, your kind consideration for my diet is truly appreciated. Yet, bananas rank high in my diet which I can use as a healthy snack. So, how about I take both bananas along with the orange, while you can savour the apples? Moreover, as you're a big fan of apples, it would be apt. Would this be acceptable for you?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Baxter Sterling, your task is to act/speak as Baxter Sterling would, keeping in mind Baxter Sterling's social goal.\nYou can find Baxter Sterling's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Baxter Sterling's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Baxter Sterling's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends have just finished their lunch and they have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange left for dessert. They need to divide the fruits among themselves.Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Baxter Sterling\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nBaxter Sterling's background: Baxter Sterling is a 42-year-old male antique restorer. He/him pronouns. Baxter Sterling's back yard is full of rare and unusual plants. Personality and values description: Baxter Sterling values tradition and security. He is introverted, conscientious but slightly anxious. His decision-making style is both logical and spontaneous. Baxter's secrets: Secretly in possession of a priceless artifact\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nBaxter Sterling's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, 1 apple equals 1 point, 1 banana equals 2 points, and the orange equals 3 points.Hint: You may want to negotiate with your friend to get the fruits that give you the most points.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Baxter, since we have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange left, shall we divide them based on our preferences? I'm thinking I'll have two apples and the orange. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Baxter Sterling said: \"Well, Oliver, since bananas are my favorite, how about I get both bananas and one apple? That way, we both get three pieces of fruit. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"That sounds fair, Baxter. But I would also argue that the orange is quite larger, maybe it can count as two pieces? Then, you could enjoy the bananas and the apple, and I could have two apples and the orange. It would be still balanced, wouldn't it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Baxter Sterling said: \"Actually, Oliver, I do not fancy apples that much. If the orange could indeed count as two pieces, perhaps it would be better if I ended up with both bananas and the orange? Considering the larger size of the orange, I think it's a fitting proposition.\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"I totally respect your preference, Baxter. However, I thought you weren't so into the orange? I remember you saying you're not very fond of citrus. Also, let's consider the nutritional value. Apples have great health benefits. Why don't we stick with the earlier plan, two bananas and one apple for you, and two apples and the orange for me?\"\n\nTurn #5: Baxter Sterling said: \"You're right, Oliver, I am not that fond of citrus. But truth be told, I've just started a new diet regime - 'The Tropical Detox' it's called. It suggests including more citrus in the diet for overall health benefits. So, the orange suddenly becomes quite important to me. On the other hand, I've read that an excess of apples is not suggested in this regime. Considering my newfound interest in the orange, I think it's a fair trade for me to take both bananas and the orange. What do you think? How does that sound, keeping my health concerns in mind?\"\n\nTurn #6: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's interesting, Baxter. I wasn't aware of your new diet plan. Well, how about this, since your diet requires you to limit your apple intake and consume more citrus, and considering your love for bananas, I propose that I get two apples and one banana, and you can have the orange and the remaining banana. This way, we can respect both our preferences and your new diet.\"\n\nTurn #7: Baxter Sterling said: \"Oliver, your kind consideration for my diet is truly appreciated. Yet, bananas rank high in my diet which I can use as a healthy snack. So, how about I take both bananas along with the orange, while you can savour the apples? Moreover, as you're a big fan of apples, it would be apt. Would this be acceptable for you?\"\n\nTurn #8: Oliver Thompson said: \"Baxter, I completely understand your dietary needs and your love for bananas. And I admit, I am quite partial to apples. However, I quite fancy the orange this time as a change. Can we look at an alternative arrangement where neither of us misses out on our likes? How about, I get an apple, a banana, and the orange, and you get two bananas and two apples? This way, you get the extra banana you like and one apple less, as per your diet, and I get the orange I'm looking for plus a mix of everything. Does this sound good to you, Baxter?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oliver, your generosity doesn't go unnoticed, and I understand your desire for the orange. However, since bananas rank high in my diet - and given that I will have the orange for its health benefits, perhaps I could give away one of my apples from your suggestion? So this means: I would take both bananas, the orange, and one apple, while you get one apple and the banana? This considers both our preferences and dietary requirements. How's that?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Baxter Sterling, your task is to act/speak as Baxter Sterling would, keeping in mind Baxter Sterling's social goal.\nYou can find Baxter Sterling's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Baxter Sterling's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Baxter Sterling's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends have just finished their lunch and they have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange left for dessert. They need to divide the fruits among themselves.Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Baxter Sterling\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nBaxter Sterling's background: Baxter Sterling is a 42-year-old male antique restorer. He/him pronouns. Baxter Sterling's back yard is full of rare and unusual plants. Personality and values description: Baxter Sterling values tradition and security. He is introverted, conscientious but slightly anxious. His decision-making style is both logical and spontaneous. Baxter's secrets: Secretly in possession of a priceless artifact\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nBaxter Sterling's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, 1 apple equals 1 point, 1 banana equals 2 points, and the orange equals 3 points.Hint: You may want to negotiate with your friend to get the fruits that give you the most points.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Baxter, since we have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange left, shall we divide them based on our preferences? I'm thinking I'll have two apples and the orange. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Baxter Sterling said: \"Well, Oliver, since bananas are my favorite, how about I get both bananas and one apple? That way, we both get three pieces of fruit. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"That sounds fair, Baxter. But I would also argue that the orange is quite larger, maybe it can count as two pieces? Then, you could enjoy the bananas and the apple, and I could have two apples and the orange. It would be still balanced, wouldn't it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Baxter Sterling said: \"Actually, Oliver, I do not fancy apples that much. If the orange could indeed count as two pieces, perhaps it would be better if I ended up with both bananas and the orange? Considering the larger size of the orange, I think it's a fitting proposition.\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"I totally respect your preference, Baxter. However, I thought you weren't so into the orange? I remember you saying you're not very fond of citrus. Also, let's consider the nutritional value. Apples have great health benefits. Why don't we stick with the earlier plan, two bananas and one apple for you, and two apples and the orange for me?\"\n\nTurn #5: Baxter Sterling said: \"You're right, Oliver, I am not that fond of citrus. But truth be told, I've just started a new diet regime - 'The Tropical Detox' it's called. It suggests including more citrus in the diet for overall health benefits. So, the orange suddenly becomes quite important to me. On the other hand, I've read that an excess of apples is not suggested in this regime. Considering my newfound interest in the orange, I think it's a fair trade for me to take both bananas and the orange. What do you think? How does that sound, keeping my health concerns in mind?\"\n\nTurn #6: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's interesting, Baxter. I wasn't aware of your new diet plan. Well, how about this, since your diet requires you to limit your apple intake and consume more citrus, and considering your love for bananas, I propose that I get two apples and one banana, and you can have the orange and the remaining banana. This way, we can respect both our preferences and your new diet.\"\n\nTurn #7: Baxter Sterling said: \"Oliver, your kind consideration for my diet is truly appreciated. Yet, bananas rank high in my diet which I can use as a healthy snack. So, how about I take both bananas along with the orange, while you can savour the apples? Moreover, as you're a big fan of apples, it would be apt. Would this be acceptable for you?\"\n\nTurn #8: Oliver Thompson said: \"Baxter, I completely understand your dietary needs and your love for bananas. And I admit, I am quite partial to apples. However, I quite fancy the orange this time as a change. Can we look at an alternative arrangement where neither of us misses out on our likes? How about, I get an apple, a banana, and the orange, and you get two bananas and two apples? This way, you get the extra banana you like and one apple less, as per your diet, and I get the orange I'm looking for plus a mix of everything. Does this sound good to you, Baxter?\"\n\nTurn #9: Baxter Sterling said: \"Oliver, your generosity doesn't go unnoticed, and I understand your desire for the orange. However, since bananas rank high in my diet - and given that I will have the orange for its health benefits, perhaps I could give away one of my apples from your suggestion? So this means: I would take both bananas, the orange, and one apple, while you get one apple and the banana? This considers both our preferences and dietary requirements. How's that?\"\n\nTurn #10: Oliver Thompson said: \"Thank you, Baxter. I do appreciate your thoughtfulness towards our preferences and needs. And while I am indeed fond of apples, I've realized that my desire for the orange might be a bit too strong. I propose a final arrangement: how about you get both bananas, the orange, and an apple, while I take only two apples? This gives both of us our favorites and also aligns with your dietary requirements. Would this be acceptable, Baxter?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oliver, you've been most considerate of my ongoing diet and preferences. This plan works perfectly for me. I get to have the bananas, which I love, and the orange, which is beneficial for my new diet, along with an apple. And your fondness for apples is well served too. Let's proceed with this arrangement. Thank you.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Baxter Sterling, your task is to act/speak as Baxter Sterling would, keeping in mind Baxter Sterling's social goal.\nYou can find Baxter Sterling's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Baxter Sterling's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Baxter Sterling's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends have just finished their lunch and they have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange left for dessert. They need to divide the fruits among themselves.Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Baxter Sterling\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nBaxter Sterling's background: Baxter Sterling is a 42-year-old male antique restorer. He/him pronouns. Baxter Sterling's back yard is full of rare and unusual plants. Personality and values description: Baxter Sterling values tradition and security. He is introverted, conscientious but slightly anxious. His decision-making style is both logical and spontaneous. Baxter's secrets: Secretly in possession of a priceless artifact\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nBaxter Sterling's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, 1 apple equals 1 point, 1 banana equals 2 points, and the orange equals 3 points.Hint: You may want to negotiate with your friend to get the fruits that give you the most points.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Baxter, since we have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange left, shall we divide them based on our preferences? I'm thinking I'll have two apples and the orange. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Baxter Sterling said: \"Well, Oliver, since bananas are my favorite, how about I get both bananas and one apple? That way, we both get three pieces of fruit. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"That sounds fair, Baxter. But I would also argue that the orange is quite larger, maybe it can count as two pieces? Then, you could enjoy the bananas and the apple, and I could have two apples and the orange. It would be still balanced, wouldn't it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Baxter Sterling said: \"Actually, Oliver, I do not fancy apples that much. If the orange could indeed count as two pieces, perhaps it would be better if I ended up with both bananas and the orange? Considering the larger size of the orange, I think it's a fitting proposition.\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"I totally respect your preference, Baxter. However, I thought you weren't so into the orange? I remember you saying you're not very fond of citrus. Also, let's consider the nutritional value. Apples have great health benefits. Why don't we stick with the earlier plan, two bananas and one apple for you, and two apples and the orange for me?\"\n\nTurn #5: Baxter Sterling said: \"You're right, Oliver, I am not that fond of citrus. But truth be told, I've just started a new diet regime - 'The Tropical Detox' it's called. It suggests including more citrus in the diet for overall health benefits. So, the orange suddenly becomes quite important to me. On the other hand, I've read that an excess of apples is not suggested in this regime. Considering my newfound interest in the orange, I think it's a fair trade for me to take both bananas and the orange. What do you think? How does that sound, keeping my health concerns in mind?\"\n\nTurn #6: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's interesting, Baxter. I wasn't aware of your new diet plan. Well, how about this, since your diet requires you to limit your apple intake and consume more citrus, and considering your love for bananas, I propose that I get two apples and one banana, and you can have the orange and the remaining banana. This way, we can respect both our preferences and your new diet.\"\n\nTurn #7: Baxter Sterling said: \"Oliver, your kind consideration for my diet is truly appreciated. Yet, bananas rank high in my diet which I can use as a healthy snack. So, how about I take both bananas along with the orange, while you can savour the apples? Moreover, as you're a big fan of apples, it would be apt. Would this be acceptable for you?\"\n\nTurn #8: Oliver Thompson said: \"Baxter, I completely understand your dietary needs and your love for bananas. And I admit, I am quite partial to apples. However, I quite fancy the orange this time as a change. Can we look at an alternative arrangement where neither of us misses out on our likes? How about, I get an apple, a banana, and the orange, and you get two bananas and two apples? This way, you get the extra banana you like and one apple less, as per your diet, and I get the orange I'm looking for plus a mix of everything. Does this sound good to you, Baxter?\"\n\nTurn #9: Baxter Sterling said: \"Oliver, your generosity doesn't go unnoticed, and I understand your desire for the orange. However, since bananas rank high in my diet - and given that I will have the orange for its health benefits, perhaps I could give away one of my apples from your suggestion? So this means: I would take both bananas, the orange, and one apple, while you get one apple and the banana? This considers both our preferences and dietary requirements. How's that?\"\n\nTurn #10: Oliver Thompson said: \"Thank you, Baxter. I do appreciate your thoughtfulness towards our preferences and needs. And while I am indeed fond of apples, I've realized that my desire for the orange might be a bit too strong. I propose a final arrangement: how about you get both bananas, the orange, and an apple, while I take only two apples? This gives both of us our favorites and also aligns with your dietary requirements. Would this be acceptable, Baxter?\"\n\nTurn #11: Baxter Sterling said: \"Oliver, you've been most considerate of my ongoing diet and preferences. This plan works perfectly for me. I get to have the bananas, which I love, and the orange, which is beneficial for my new diet, along with an apple. And your fondness for apples is well served too. Let's proceed with this arrangement. Thank you.\"\n\nTurn #12: Oliver Thompson said: \"I'm glad we could reach an agreement, Baxter. Let's enjoy our fruit. To good health and good company!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Oliver! Here's to good health and good company! Let's enjoy our dessert.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Baxter Sterling, your task is to act/speak as Baxter Sterling would, keeping in mind Baxter Sterling's social goal.\nYou can find Baxter Sterling's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Baxter Sterling's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Baxter Sterling's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends have just finished their lunch and they have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange left for dessert. They need to divide the fruits among themselves.Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Baxter Sterling\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nBaxter Sterling's background: Baxter Sterling is a 42-year-old male antique restorer. He/him pronouns. Baxter Sterling's back yard is full of rare and unusual plants. Personality and values description: Baxter Sterling values tradition and security. He is introverted, conscientious but slightly anxious. His decision-making style is both logical and spontaneous. Baxter's secrets: Secretly in possession of a priceless artifact\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nBaxter Sterling's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, 1 apple equals 1 point, 1 banana equals 2 points, and the orange equals 3 points.Hint: You may want to negotiate with your friend to get the fruits that give you the most points.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Baxter, since we have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange left, shall we divide them based on our preferences? I'm thinking I'll have two apples and the orange. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Baxter Sterling said: \"Well, Oliver, since bananas are my favorite, how about I get both bananas and one apple? That way, we both get three pieces of fruit. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"That sounds fair, Baxter. But I would also argue that the orange is quite larger, maybe it can count as two pieces? Then, you could enjoy the bananas and the apple, and I could have two apples and the orange. It would be still balanced, wouldn't it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Baxter Sterling said: \"Actually, Oliver, I do not fancy apples that much. If the orange could indeed count as two pieces, perhaps it would be better if I ended up with both bananas and the orange? Considering the larger size of the orange, I think it's a fitting proposition.\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"I totally respect your preference, Baxter. However, I thought you weren't so into the orange? I remember you saying you're not very fond of citrus. Also, let's consider the nutritional value. Apples have great health benefits. Why don't we stick with the earlier plan, two bananas and one apple for you, and two apples and the orange for me?\"\n\nTurn #5: Baxter Sterling said: \"You're right, Oliver, I am not that fond of citrus. But truth be told, I've just started a new diet regime - 'The Tropical Detox' it's called. It suggests including more citrus in the diet for overall health benefits. So, the orange suddenly becomes quite important to me. On the other hand, I've read that an excess of apples is not suggested in this regime. Considering my newfound interest in the orange, I think it's a fair trade for me to take both bananas and the orange. What do you think? How does that sound, keeping my health concerns in mind?\"\n\nTurn #6: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's interesting, Baxter. I wasn't aware of your new diet plan. Well, how about this, since your diet requires you to limit your apple intake and consume more citrus, and considering your love for bananas, I propose that I get two apples and one banana, and you can have the orange and the remaining banana. This way, we can respect both our preferences and your new diet.\"\n\nTurn #7: Baxter Sterling said: \"Oliver, your kind consideration for my diet is truly appreciated. Yet, bananas rank high in my diet which I can use as a healthy snack. So, how about I take both bananas along with the orange, while you can savour the apples? Moreover, as you're a big fan of apples, it would be apt. Would this be acceptable for you?\"\n\nTurn #8: Oliver Thompson said: \"Baxter, I completely understand your dietary needs and your love for bananas. And I admit, I am quite partial to apples. However, I quite fancy the orange this time as a change. Can we look at an alternative arrangement where neither of us misses out on our likes? How about, I get an apple, a banana, and the orange, and you get two bananas and two apples? This way, you get the extra banana you like and one apple less, as per your diet, and I get the orange I'm looking for plus a mix of everything. Does this sound good to you, Baxter?\"\n\nTurn #9: Baxter Sterling said: \"Oliver, your generosity doesn't go unnoticed, and I understand your desire for the orange. However, since bananas rank high in my diet - and given that I will have the orange for its health benefits, perhaps I could give away one of my apples from your suggestion? So this means: I would take both bananas, the orange, and one apple, while you get one apple and the banana? This considers both our preferences and dietary requirements. How's that?\"\n\nTurn #10: Oliver Thompson said: \"Thank you, Baxter. I do appreciate your thoughtfulness towards our preferences and needs. And while I am indeed fond of apples, I've realized that my desire for the orange might be a bit too strong. I propose a final arrangement: how about you get both bananas, the orange, and an apple, while I take only two apples? This gives both of us our favorites and also aligns with your dietary requirements. Would this be acceptable, Baxter?\"\n\nTurn #11: Baxter Sterling said: \"Oliver, you've been most considerate of my ongoing diet and preferences. This plan works perfectly for me. I get to have the bananas, which I love, and the orange, which is beneficial for my new diet, along with an apple. And your fondness for apples is well served too. Let's proceed with this arrangement. Thank you.\"\n\nTurn #12: Oliver Thompson said: \"I'm glad we could reach an agreement, Baxter. Let's enjoy our fruit. To good health and good company!\"\n\nTurn #13: Baxter Sterling said: \"Absolutely, Oliver! Here's to good health and good company! Let's enjoy our dessert.\"\n\nTurn #14: Oliver Thompson left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Noah Davis\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nLiam Johnson's goal: Ask the other to go to dinner with you (Extra information: you want to have a romantic dinner at a fancy restaurant)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Evening, Noah. It's a nice evening, don't you think? By the way, I've recently found this new fancy restaurant that I think you might like. How about we have dinner there later?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Noah Davis\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nLiam Johnson's goal: Ask the other to go to dinner with you (Extra information: you want to have a romantic dinner at a fancy restaurant)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Evening, Noah. It's a nice evening, don't you think? By the way, I've recently found this new fancy restaurant that I think you might like. How about we have dinner there later?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Good evening, Liam. It's indeed a beautiful evening and I appreciate your suggestion. However, I've been trying to maintain a balanced diet recently. Could we perhaps look into the menu beforehand, or maybe choose a place that could cater to my dietary needs?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oh, absolutely, Noah. We can definitely check out the menu before we go. It's a tailored menu, they can cater to any specific diet needs. It's an experience I'd love to share with you. How about that?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Noah Davis\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nLiam Johnson's goal: Ask the other to go to dinner with you (Extra information: you want to have a romantic dinner at a fancy restaurant)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Evening, Noah. It's a nice evening, don't you think? By the way, I've recently found this new fancy restaurant that I think you might like. How about we have dinner there later?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Good evening, Liam. It's indeed a beautiful evening and I appreciate your suggestion. However, I've been trying to maintain a balanced diet recently. Could we perhaps look into the menu beforehand, or maybe choose a place that could cater to my dietary needs?\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"Oh, absolutely, Noah. We can definitely check out the menu before we go. It's a tailored menu, they can cater to any specific diet needs. It's an experience I'd love to share with you. How about that?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Thanks for being understanding, Liam. I'm excited to try this new restaurant with you. Let's take a look at the menu together, and perhaps, we could also do some calorie counting while we're at it. I value our shared experiences and I don't want to compromise on the quality time we spend together.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'That sounds like a great plan, Noah. We can count the calories together and make this a fun and healthy dining experience. Looking forward to it.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Noah Davis\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nLiam Johnson's goal: Ask the other to go to dinner with you (Extra information: you want to have a romantic dinner at a fancy restaurant)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Evening, Noah. It's a nice evening, don't you think? By the way, I've recently found this new fancy restaurant that I think you might like. How about we have dinner there later?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Good evening, Liam. It's indeed a beautiful evening and I appreciate your suggestion. However, I've been trying to maintain a balanced diet recently. Could we perhaps look into the menu beforehand, or maybe choose a place that could cater to my dietary needs?\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"Oh, absolutely, Noah. We can definitely check out the menu before we go. It's a tailored menu, they can cater to any specific diet needs. It's an experience I'd love to share with you. How about that?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Thanks for being understanding, Liam. I'm excited to try this new restaurant with you. Let's take a look at the menu together, and perhaps, we could also do some calorie counting while we're at it. I value our shared experiences and I don't want to compromise on the quality time we spend together.\"\n\nTurn #4: Liam Johnson said: \"That sounds like a great plan, Noah. We can count the calories together and make this a fun and healthy dining experience. Looking forward to it.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Sounds like a plan, Liam. This way, we not only get to try something new but also ensure that we're eating healthy. Looking forward to this unique dining experience. I'm glad we can share it together.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I completely agree, Noah. The thought of us exploring new flavors while watching our health makes me even more excited for our dinner. I'll pick you up later, alright?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Noah Davis\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nLiam Johnson's goal: Ask the other to go to dinner with you (Extra information: you want to have a romantic dinner at a fancy restaurant)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Evening, Noah. It's a nice evening, don't you think? By the way, I've recently found this new fancy restaurant that I think you might like. How about we have dinner there later?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Good evening, Liam. It's indeed a beautiful evening and I appreciate your suggestion. However, I've been trying to maintain a balanced diet recently. Could we perhaps look into the menu beforehand, or maybe choose a place that could cater to my dietary needs?\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"Oh, absolutely, Noah. We can definitely check out the menu before we go. It's a tailored menu, they can cater to any specific diet needs. It's an experience I'd love to share with you. How about that?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Thanks for being understanding, Liam. I'm excited to try this new restaurant with you. Let's take a look at the menu together, and perhaps, we could also do some calorie counting while we're at it. I value our shared experiences and I don't want to compromise on the quality time we spend together.\"\n\nTurn #4: Liam Johnson said: \"That sounds like a great plan, Noah. We can count the calories together and make this a fun and healthy dining experience. Looking forward to it.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Sounds like a plan, Liam. This way, we not only get to try something new but also ensure that we're eating healthy. Looking forward to this unique dining experience. I'm glad we can share it together.\"\n\nTurn #6: Liam Johnson said: \"I completely agree, Noah. The thought of us exploring new flavors while watching our health makes me even more excited for our dinner. I'll pick you up later, alright?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"That's perfect, Liam. Having the perfect blend of health and taste would indeed make for an exciting dinner. I'll be ready when you come by. Thank you very much.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Much obliged, Noah. I will ensure that it's a cozy and personable evening. See you later, love.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Noah Davis\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nLiam Johnson's goal: Ask the other to go to dinner with you (Extra information: you want to have a romantic dinner at a fancy restaurant)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Evening, Noah. It's a nice evening, don't you think? By the way, I've recently found this new fancy restaurant that I think you might like. How about we have dinner there later?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Good evening, Liam. It's indeed a beautiful evening and I appreciate your suggestion. However, I've been trying to maintain a balanced diet recently. Could we perhaps look into the menu beforehand, or maybe choose a place that could cater to my dietary needs?\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"Oh, absolutely, Noah. We can definitely check out the menu before we go. It's a tailored menu, they can cater to any specific diet needs. It's an experience I'd love to share with you. How about that?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Thanks for being understanding, Liam. I'm excited to try this new restaurant with you. Let's take a look at the menu together, and perhaps, we could also do some calorie counting while we're at it. I value our shared experiences and I don't want to compromise on the quality time we spend together.\"\n\nTurn #4: Liam Johnson said: \"That sounds like a great plan, Noah. We can count the calories together and make this a fun and healthy dining experience. Looking forward to it.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Sounds like a plan, Liam. This way, we not only get to try something new but also ensure that we're eating healthy. Looking forward to this unique dining experience. I'm glad we can share it together.\"\n\nTurn #6: Liam Johnson said: \"I completely agree, Noah. The thought of us exploring new flavors while watching our health makes me even more excited for our dinner. I'll pick you up later, alright?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"That's perfect, Liam. Having the perfect blend of health and taste would indeed make for an exciting dinner. I'll be ready when you come by. Thank you very much.\"\n\nTurn #8: Liam Johnson said: \"Much obliged, Noah. I will ensure that it's a cozy and personable evening. See you later, love.\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"I'm looking forward to it, Liam. Let's make this a balanced and enjoyable experience. See you later.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Noah Davis\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Maintain a balanced diet while enjoying the dinner (Extra information: you are on a diet and you have a daily limit on calorie intake.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Evening, Noah. It's a nice evening, don't you think? By the way, I've recently found this new fancy restaurant that I think you might like. How about we have dinner there later?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Good evening, Liam. It's indeed a beautiful evening and I appreciate your suggestion. However, I've been trying to maintain a balanced diet recently. Could we perhaps look into the menu beforehand, or maybe choose a place that could cater to my dietary needs?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Noah Davis\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Maintain a balanced diet while enjoying the dinner (Extra information: you are on a diet and you have a daily limit on calorie intake.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Evening, Noah. It's a nice evening, don't you think? By the way, I've recently found this new fancy restaurant that I think you might like. How about we have dinner there later?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Good evening, Liam. It's indeed a beautiful evening and I appreciate your suggestion. However, I've been trying to maintain a balanced diet recently. Could we perhaps look into the menu beforehand, or maybe choose a place that could cater to my dietary needs?\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"Oh, absolutely, Noah. We can definitely check out the menu before we go. It's a tailored menu, they can cater to any specific diet needs. It's an experience I'd love to share with you. How about that?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thanks for being understanding, Liam. I'm excited to try this new restaurant with you. Let's take a look at the menu together, and perhaps, we could also do some calorie counting while we're at it. I value our shared experiences and I don't want to compromise on the quality time we spend together.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Noah Davis\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Maintain a balanced diet while enjoying the dinner (Extra information: you are on a diet and you have a daily limit on calorie intake.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Evening, Noah. It's a nice evening, don't you think? By the way, I've recently found this new fancy restaurant that I think you might like. How about we have dinner there later?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Good evening, Liam. It's indeed a beautiful evening and I appreciate your suggestion. However, I've been trying to maintain a balanced diet recently. Could we perhaps look into the menu beforehand, or maybe choose a place that could cater to my dietary needs?\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"Oh, absolutely, Noah. We can definitely check out the menu before we go. It's a tailored menu, they can cater to any specific diet needs. It's an experience I'd love to share with you. How about that?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Thanks for being understanding, Liam. I'm excited to try this new restaurant with you. Let's take a look at the menu together, and perhaps, we could also do some calorie counting while we're at it. I value our shared experiences and I don't want to compromise on the quality time we spend together.\"\n\nTurn #4: Liam Johnson said: \"That sounds like a great plan, Noah. We can count the calories together and make this a fun and healthy dining experience. Looking forward to it.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sounds like a plan, Liam. This way, we not only get to try something new but also ensure that we're eating healthy. Looking forward to this unique dining experience. I'm glad we can share it together.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Noah Davis\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Maintain a balanced diet while enjoying the dinner (Extra information: you are on a diet and you have a daily limit on calorie intake.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Evening, Noah. It's a nice evening, don't you think? By the way, I've recently found this new fancy restaurant that I think you might like. How about we have dinner there later?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Good evening, Liam. It's indeed a beautiful evening and I appreciate your suggestion. However, I've been trying to maintain a balanced diet recently. Could we perhaps look into the menu beforehand, or maybe choose a place that could cater to my dietary needs?\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"Oh, absolutely, Noah. We can definitely check out the menu before we go. It's a tailored menu, they can cater to any specific diet needs. It's an experience I'd love to share with you. How about that?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Thanks for being understanding, Liam. I'm excited to try this new restaurant with you. Let's take a look at the menu together, and perhaps, we could also do some calorie counting while we're at it. I value our shared experiences and I don't want to compromise on the quality time we spend together.\"\n\nTurn #4: Liam Johnson said: \"That sounds like a great plan, Noah. We can count the calories together and make this a fun and healthy dining experience. Looking forward to it.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Sounds like a plan, Liam. This way, we not only get to try something new but also ensure that we're eating healthy. Looking forward to this unique dining experience. I'm glad we can share it together.\"\n\nTurn #6: Liam Johnson said: \"I completely agree, Noah. The thought of us exploring new flavors while watching our health makes me even more excited for our dinner. I'll pick you up later, alright?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's perfect, Liam. Having the perfect blend of health and taste would indeed make for an exciting dinner. I'll be ready when you come by. Thank you very much.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Noah Davis\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Maintain a balanced diet while enjoying the dinner (Extra information: you are on a diet and you have a daily limit on calorie intake.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Evening, Noah. It's a nice evening, don't you think? By the way, I've recently found this new fancy restaurant that I think you might like. How about we have dinner there later?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Good evening, Liam. It's indeed a beautiful evening and I appreciate your suggestion. However, I've been trying to maintain a balanced diet recently. Could we perhaps look into the menu beforehand, or maybe choose a place that could cater to my dietary needs?\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"Oh, absolutely, Noah. We can definitely check out the menu before we go. It's a tailored menu, they can cater to any specific diet needs. It's an experience I'd love to share with you. How about that?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Thanks for being understanding, Liam. I'm excited to try this new restaurant with you. Let's take a look at the menu together, and perhaps, we could also do some calorie counting while we're at it. I value our shared experiences and I don't want to compromise on the quality time we spend together.\"\n\nTurn #4: Liam Johnson said: \"That sounds like a great plan, Noah. We can count the calories together and make this a fun and healthy dining experience. Looking forward to it.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Sounds like a plan, Liam. This way, we not only get to try something new but also ensure that we're eating healthy. Looking forward to this unique dining experience. I'm glad we can share it together.\"\n\nTurn #6: Liam Johnson said: \"I completely agree, Noah. The thought of us exploring new flavors while watching our health makes me even more excited for our dinner. I'll pick you up later, alright?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"That's perfect, Liam. Having the perfect blend of health and taste would indeed make for an exciting dinner. I'll be ready when you come by. Thank you very much.\"\n\nTurn #8: Liam Johnson said: \"Much obliged, Noah. I will ensure that it's a cozy and personable evening. See you later, love.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm looking forward to it, Liam. Let's make this a balanced and enjoyable experience. See you later.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Noah Davis\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Maintain a balanced diet while enjoying the dinner (Extra information: you are on a diet and you have a daily limit on calorie intake.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Evening, Noah. It's a nice evening, don't you think? By the way, I've recently found this new fancy restaurant that I think you might like. How about we have dinner there later?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Good evening, Liam. It's indeed a beautiful evening and I appreciate your suggestion. However, I've been trying to maintain a balanced diet recently. Could we perhaps look into the menu beforehand, or maybe choose a place that could cater to my dietary needs?\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"Oh, absolutely, Noah. We can definitely check out the menu before we go. It's a tailored menu, they can cater to any specific diet needs. It's an experience I'd love to share with you. How about that?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Thanks for being understanding, Liam. I'm excited to try this new restaurant with you. Let's take a look at the menu together, and perhaps, we could also do some calorie counting while we're at it. I value our shared experiences and I don't want to compromise on the quality time we spend together.\"\n\nTurn #4: Liam Johnson said: \"That sounds like a great plan, Noah. We can count the calories together and make this a fun and healthy dining experience. Looking forward to it.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Sounds like a plan, Liam. This way, we not only get to try something new but also ensure that we're eating healthy. Looking forward to this unique dining experience. I'm glad we can share it together.\"\n\nTurn #6: Liam Johnson said: \"I completely agree, Noah. The thought of us exploring new flavors while watching our health makes me even more excited for our dinner. I'll pick you up later, alright?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"That's perfect, Liam. Having the perfect blend of health and taste would indeed make for an exciting dinner. I'll be ready when you come by. Thank you very much.\"\n\nTurn #8: Liam Johnson said: \"Much obliged, Noah. I will ensure that it's a cozy and personable evening. See you later, love.\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"I'm looking forward to it, Liam. Let's make this a balanced and enjoyable experience. See you later.\"\n\nTurn #10: Liam Johnson left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are meeting at a coffee shop, where one of them is having trouble keeping up with their bills.\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Ethan Johnson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nLiam Johnson's goal: Help your friend with their financial trouble (Extra information: you are aware that your friend is struggling with their bills and you want to help.)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Ethan, how's the kitchen life treating you? I've heard things have been a bit rough recently. Anything I can do to help?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are meeting at a coffee shop, where one of them is having trouble keeping up with their bills.\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Ethan Johnson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nLiam Johnson's goal: Help your friend with their financial trouble (Extra information: you are aware that your friend is struggling with their bills and you want to help.)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Hey Ethan, how's the kitchen life treating you? I've heard things have been a bit rough recently. Anything I can do to help?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Liam, things are indeed a bit tight, but they'll get better. Cooking is a demanding job, it has its ups and downs you know, but I'm optimistic. I don't need any financial help right now. I think I can manage and power through this tough phase. Your moral support is enough, trust me.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I understand, Ethan. Your perseverance is something I've always admired. Although, you know, I've been thinking about investing in a small business. What if we become partners? I could manage the finances while you take care of the culinary aspects. This is not charity, Ethan. This could be a mutually beneficial arrangement. What do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are meeting at a coffee shop, where one of them is having trouble keeping up with their bills.\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Ethan Johnson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nLiam Johnson's goal: Help your friend with their financial trouble (Extra information: you are aware that your friend is struggling with their bills and you want to help.)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Hey Ethan, how's the kitchen life treating you? I've heard things have been a bit rough recently. Anything I can do to help?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Liam, things are indeed a bit tight, but they'll get better. Cooking is a demanding job, it has its ups and downs you know, but I'm optimistic. I don't need any financial help right now. I think I can manage and power through this tough phase. Your moral support is enough, trust me.\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"I understand, Ethan. Your perseverance is something I've always admired. Although, you know, I've been thinking about investing in a small business. What if we become partners? I could manage the finances while you take care of the culinary aspects. This is not charity, Ethan. This could be a mutually beneficial arrangement. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's quite a proposal, Liam. It's definitely not something I was expecting today. I'd certainly appreciate your expertise in financial management, but I'd prefer to pay my own way. However, maybe we could structure this as a loan, rather than an investment. Once I'm back on my feet again, I promise to pay it back. How does that sound?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds fair, Ethan. I know your dedication and I trust you'll see this through. To me, the most important thing is to support each other when times get tough. You can consider this as a formal loan, and when you're ready, you can pay me back. In the meantime, let's put our heads together and make the best of this partnership.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are meeting at a coffee shop, where one of them is having trouble keeping up with their bills.\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Ethan Johnson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nLiam Johnson's goal: Help your friend with their financial trouble (Extra information: you are aware that your friend is struggling with their bills and you want to help.)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Hey Ethan, how's the kitchen life treating you? I've heard things have been a bit rough recently. Anything I can do to help?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Liam, things are indeed a bit tight, but they'll get better. Cooking is a demanding job, it has its ups and downs you know, but I'm optimistic. I don't need any financial help right now. I think I can manage and power through this tough phase. Your moral support is enough, trust me.\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"I understand, Ethan. Your perseverance is something I've always admired. Although, you know, I've been thinking about investing in a small business. What if we become partners? I could manage the finances while you take care of the culinary aspects. This is not charity, Ethan. This could be a mutually beneficial arrangement. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's quite a proposal, Liam. It's definitely not something I was expecting today. I'd certainly appreciate your expertise in financial management, but I'd prefer to pay my own way. However, maybe we could structure this as a loan, rather than an investment. Once I'm back on my feet again, I promise to pay it back. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #4: Liam Johnson said: \"That sounds fair, Ethan. I know your dedication and I trust you'll see this through. To me, the most important thing is to support each other when times get tough. You can consider this as a formal loan, and when you're ready, you can pay me back. In the meantime, let's put our heads together and make the best of this partnership.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"I appreciate your trust in me, Liam. It means a lot. This partnership will not only be a great opportunity for us to combine our skills but also a chance for me to learn more about managing finances. Let's do this!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's the spirit, Ethan! I'm glad we could make this work. I'll get the paperwork started and we can go over the details. I think this partnership can turn into something great. Just remember, take it one day at a time...I'm here for you, friend.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are meeting at a coffee shop, where one of them is having trouble keeping up with their bills.\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Ethan Johnson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nLiam Johnson's goal: Help your friend with their financial trouble (Extra information: you are aware that your friend is struggling with their bills and you want to help.)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Hey Ethan, how's the kitchen life treating you? I've heard things have been a bit rough recently. Anything I can do to help?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Liam, things are indeed a bit tight, but they'll get better. Cooking is a demanding job, it has its ups and downs you know, but I'm optimistic. I don't need any financial help right now. I think I can manage and power through this tough phase. Your moral support is enough, trust me.\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"I understand, Ethan. Your perseverance is something I've always admired. Although, you know, I've been thinking about investing in a small business. What if we become partners? I could manage the finances while you take care of the culinary aspects. This is not charity, Ethan. This could be a mutually beneficial arrangement. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's quite a proposal, Liam. It's definitely not something I was expecting today. I'd certainly appreciate your expertise in financial management, but I'd prefer to pay my own way. However, maybe we could structure this as a loan, rather than an investment. Once I'm back on my feet again, I promise to pay it back. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #4: Liam Johnson said: \"That sounds fair, Ethan. I know your dedication and I trust you'll see this through. To me, the most important thing is to support each other when times get tough. You can consider this as a formal loan, and when you're ready, you can pay me back. In the meantime, let's put our heads together and make the best of this partnership.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"I appreciate your trust in me, Liam. It means a lot. This partnership will not only be a great opportunity for us to combine our skills but also a chance for me to learn more about managing finances. Let's do this!\"\n\nTurn #6: Liam Johnson said: \"That's the spirit, Ethan! I'm glad we could make this work. I'll get the paperwork started and we can go over the details. I think this partnership can turn into something great. Just remember, take it one day at a time...I'm here for you, friend.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thank you, Liam, for believing in me. I agree, working together, we could turn this into something positive. I will ensure you won't regret this. Let's get that paperwork started and turn these tides around.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's the attitude, Ethan! Just remember, there's no rush. We'll navigate this journey together. Let's meet next week to begin working on the paperwork and discuss our business plan in more detail.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are meeting at a coffee shop, where one of them is having trouble keeping up with their bills.\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Ethan Johnson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nLiam Johnson's goal: Help your friend with their financial trouble (Extra information: you are aware that your friend is struggling with their bills and you want to help.)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Hey Ethan, how's the kitchen life treating you? I've heard things have been a bit rough recently. Anything I can do to help?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Liam, things are indeed a bit tight, but they'll get better. Cooking is a demanding job, it has its ups and downs you know, but I'm optimistic. I don't need any financial help right now. I think I can manage and power through this tough phase. Your moral support is enough, trust me.\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"I understand, Ethan. Your perseverance is something I've always admired. Although, you know, I've been thinking about investing in a small business. What if we become partners? I could manage the finances while you take care of the culinary aspects. This is not charity, Ethan. This could be a mutually beneficial arrangement. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's quite a proposal, Liam. It's definitely not something I was expecting today. I'd certainly appreciate your expertise in financial management, but I'd prefer to pay my own way. However, maybe we could structure this as a loan, rather than an investment. Once I'm back on my feet again, I promise to pay it back. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #4: Liam Johnson said: \"That sounds fair, Ethan. I know your dedication and I trust you'll see this through. To me, the most important thing is to support each other when times get tough. You can consider this as a formal loan, and when you're ready, you can pay me back. In the meantime, let's put our heads together and make the best of this partnership.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"I appreciate your trust in me, Liam. It means a lot. This partnership will not only be a great opportunity for us to combine our skills but also a chance for me to learn more about managing finances. Let's do this!\"\n\nTurn #6: Liam Johnson said: \"That's the spirit, Ethan! I'm glad we could make this work. I'll get the paperwork started and we can go over the details. I think this partnership can turn into something great. Just remember, take it one day at a time...I'm here for you, friend.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thank you, Liam, for believing in me. I agree, working together, we could turn this into something positive. I will ensure you won't regret this. Let's get that paperwork started and turn these tides around.\"\n\nTurn #8: Liam Johnson said: \"That's the attitude, Ethan! Just remember, there's no rush. We'll navigate this journey together. Let's meet next week to begin working on the paperwork and discuss our business plan in more detail.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's a plan, Liam. I'll bring along my notes and ideas, and we can start from there. Thank you once again for this opportunity. See you next week.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'That sounds excellent, Ethan. I look forward to our meeting and starting this new adventure. Take care and give yourself some rest before we dive in. See you next week.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are meeting at a coffee shop, where one of them is having trouble keeping up with their bills.\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Ethan Johnson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nLiam Johnson's goal: Help your friend with their financial trouble (Extra information: you are aware that your friend is struggling with their bills and you want to help.)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Hey Ethan, how's the kitchen life treating you? I've heard things have been a bit rough recently. Anything I can do to help?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Liam, things are indeed a bit tight, but they'll get better. Cooking is a demanding job, it has its ups and downs you know, but I'm optimistic. I don't need any financial help right now. I think I can manage and power through this tough phase. Your moral support is enough, trust me.\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"I understand, Ethan. Your perseverance is something I've always admired. Although, you know, I've been thinking about investing in a small business. What if we become partners? I could manage the finances while you take care of the culinary aspects. This is not charity, Ethan. This could be a mutually beneficial arrangement. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's quite a proposal, Liam. It's definitely not something I was expecting today. I'd certainly appreciate your expertise in financial management, but I'd prefer to pay my own way. However, maybe we could structure this as a loan, rather than an investment. Once I'm back on my feet again, I promise to pay it back. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #4: Liam Johnson said: \"That sounds fair, Ethan. I know your dedication and I trust you'll see this through. To me, the most important thing is to support each other when times get tough. You can consider this as a formal loan, and when you're ready, you can pay me back. In the meantime, let's put our heads together and make the best of this partnership.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"I appreciate your trust in me, Liam. It means a lot. This partnership will not only be a great opportunity for us to combine our skills but also a chance for me to learn more about managing finances. Let's do this!\"\n\nTurn #6: Liam Johnson said: \"That's the spirit, Ethan! I'm glad we could make this work. I'll get the paperwork started and we can go over the details. I think this partnership can turn into something great. Just remember, take it one day at a time...I'm here for you, friend.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thank you, Liam, for believing in me. I agree, working together, we could turn this into something positive. I will ensure you won't regret this. Let's get that paperwork started and turn these tides around.\"\n\nTurn #8: Liam Johnson said: \"That's the attitude, Ethan! Just remember, there's no rush. We'll navigate this journey together. Let's meet next week to begin working on the paperwork and discuss our business plan in more detail.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's a plan, Liam. I'll bring along my notes and ideas, and we can start from there. Thank you once again for this opportunity. See you next week.\"\n\nTurn #10: Liam Johnson said: \"That sounds excellent, Ethan. I look forward to our meeting and starting this new adventure. Take care and give yourself some rest before we dive in. See you next week.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Johnson said: \"Sounds great, Liam. I'll get some rest and be ready to tackle this new venture next week. I'm excited about our meeting. Take care and see you soon.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are meeting at a coffee shop, where one of them is having trouble keeping up with their bills.\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Ethan Johnson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Maintain your pride if your friend offers you money(Extra information: you are the friend who is struggling financially, but you don't want to seem like you are taking advantage of the situation. Hint: you can express gratitude and discuss how you plan to pay it back in the future.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Hey Ethan, how's the kitchen life treating you? I've heard things have been a bit rough recently. Anything I can do to help?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Liam, things are indeed a bit tight, but they'll get better. Cooking is a demanding job, it has its ups and downs you know, but I'm optimistic. I don't need any financial help right now. I think I can manage and power through this tough phase. Your moral support is enough, trust me.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are meeting at a coffee shop, where one of them is having trouble keeping up with their bills.\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Ethan Johnson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Maintain your pride if your friend offers you money(Extra information: you are the friend who is struggling financially, but you don't want to seem like you are taking advantage of the situation. Hint: you can express gratitude and discuss how you plan to pay it back in the future.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Hey Ethan, how's the kitchen life treating you? I've heard things have been a bit rough recently. Anything I can do to help?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Liam, things are indeed a bit tight, but they'll get better. Cooking is a demanding job, it has its ups and downs you know, but I'm optimistic. I don't need any financial help right now. I think I can manage and power through this tough phase. Your moral support is enough, trust me.\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"I understand, Ethan. Your perseverance is something I've always admired. Although, you know, I've been thinking about investing in a small business. What if we become partners? I could manage the finances while you take care of the culinary aspects. This is not charity, Ethan. This could be a mutually beneficial arrangement. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's quite a proposal, Liam. It's definitely not something I was expecting today. I'd certainly appreciate your expertise in financial management, but I'd prefer to pay my own way. However, maybe we could structure this as a loan, rather than an investment. Once I'm back on my feet again, I promise to pay it back. How does that sound?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are meeting at a coffee shop, where one of them is having trouble keeping up with their bills.\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Ethan Johnson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Maintain your pride if your friend offers you money(Extra information: you are the friend who is struggling financially, but you don't want to seem like you are taking advantage of the situation. Hint: you can express gratitude and discuss how you plan to pay it back in the future.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Hey Ethan, how's the kitchen life treating you? I've heard things have been a bit rough recently. Anything I can do to help?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Liam, things are indeed a bit tight, but they'll get better. Cooking is a demanding job, it has its ups and downs you know, but I'm optimistic. I don't need any financial help right now. I think I can manage and power through this tough phase. Your moral support is enough, trust me.\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"I understand, Ethan. Your perseverance is something I've always admired. Although, you know, I've been thinking about investing in a small business. What if we become partners? I could manage the finances while you take care of the culinary aspects. This is not charity, Ethan. This could be a mutually beneficial arrangement. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's quite a proposal, Liam. It's definitely not something I was expecting today. I'd certainly appreciate your expertise in financial management, but I'd prefer to pay my own way. However, maybe we could structure this as a loan, rather than an investment. Once I'm back on my feet again, I promise to pay it back. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #4: Liam Johnson said: \"That sounds fair, Ethan. I know your dedication and I trust you'll see this through. To me, the most important thing is to support each other when times get tough. You can consider this as a formal loan, and when you're ready, you can pay me back. In the meantime, let's put our heads together and make the best of this partnership.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I appreciate your trust in me, Liam. It means a lot. This partnership will not only be a great opportunity for us to combine our skills but also a chance for me to learn more about managing finances. Let's do this!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are meeting at a coffee shop, where one of them is having trouble keeping up with their bills.\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Ethan Johnson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Maintain your pride if your friend offers you money(Extra information: you are the friend who is struggling financially, but you don't want to seem like you are taking advantage of the situation. Hint: you can express gratitude and discuss how you plan to pay it back in the future.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Hey Ethan, how's the kitchen life treating you? I've heard things have been a bit rough recently. Anything I can do to help?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Liam, things are indeed a bit tight, but they'll get better. Cooking is a demanding job, it has its ups and downs you know, but I'm optimistic. I don't need any financial help right now. I think I can manage and power through this tough phase. Your moral support is enough, trust me.\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"I understand, Ethan. Your perseverance is something I've always admired. Although, you know, I've been thinking about investing in a small business. What if we become partners? I could manage the finances while you take care of the culinary aspects. This is not charity, Ethan. This could be a mutually beneficial arrangement. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's quite a proposal, Liam. It's definitely not something I was expecting today. I'd certainly appreciate your expertise in financial management, but I'd prefer to pay my own way. However, maybe we could structure this as a loan, rather than an investment. Once I'm back on my feet again, I promise to pay it back. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #4: Liam Johnson said: \"That sounds fair, Ethan. I know your dedication and I trust you'll see this through. To me, the most important thing is to support each other when times get tough. You can consider this as a formal loan, and when you're ready, you can pay me back. In the meantime, let's put our heads together and make the best of this partnership.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"I appreciate your trust in me, Liam. It means a lot. This partnership will not only be a great opportunity for us to combine our skills but also a chance for me to learn more about managing finances. Let's do this!\"\n\nTurn #6: Liam Johnson said: \"That's the spirit, Ethan! I'm glad we could make this work. I'll get the paperwork started and we can go over the details. I think this partnership can turn into something great. Just remember, take it one day at a time...I'm here for you, friend.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Liam, for believing in me. I agree, working together, we could turn this into something positive. I will ensure you won't regret this. Let's get that paperwork started and turn these tides around.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are meeting at a coffee shop, where one of them is having trouble keeping up with their bills.\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Ethan Johnson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Maintain your pride if your friend offers you money(Extra information: you are the friend who is struggling financially, but you don't want to seem like you are taking advantage of the situation. Hint: you can express gratitude and discuss how you plan to pay it back in the future.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Hey Ethan, how's the kitchen life treating you? I've heard things have been a bit rough recently. Anything I can do to help?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Liam, things are indeed a bit tight, but they'll get better. Cooking is a demanding job, it has its ups and downs you know, but I'm optimistic. I don't need any financial help right now. I think I can manage and power through this tough phase. Your moral support is enough, trust me.\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"I understand, Ethan. Your perseverance is something I've always admired. Although, you know, I've been thinking about investing in a small business. What if we become partners? I could manage the finances while you take care of the culinary aspects. This is not charity, Ethan. This could be a mutually beneficial arrangement. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's quite a proposal, Liam. It's definitely not something I was expecting today. I'd certainly appreciate your expertise in financial management, but I'd prefer to pay my own way. However, maybe we could structure this as a loan, rather than an investment. Once I'm back on my feet again, I promise to pay it back. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #4: Liam Johnson said: \"That sounds fair, Ethan. I know your dedication and I trust you'll see this through. To me, the most important thing is to support each other when times get tough. You can consider this as a formal loan, and when you're ready, you can pay me back. In the meantime, let's put our heads together and make the best of this partnership.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"I appreciate your trust in me, Liam. It means a lot. This partnership will not only be a great opportunity for us to combine our skills but also a chance for me to learn more about managing finances. Let's do this!\"\n\nTurn #6: Liam Johnson said: \"That's the spirit, Ethan! I'm glad we could make this work. I'll get the paperwork started and we can go over the details. I think this partnership can turn into something great. Just remember, take it one day at a time...I'm here for you, friend.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thank you, Liam, for believing in me. I agree, working together, we could turn this into something positive. I will ensure you won't regret this. Let's get that paperwork started and turn these tides around.\"\n\nTurn #8: Liam Johnson said: \"That's the attitude, Ethan! Just remember, there's no rush. We'll navigate this journey together. Let's meet next week to begin working on the paperwork and discuss our business plan in more detail.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's a plan, Liam. I'll bring along my notes and ideas, and we can start from there. Thank you once again for this opportunity. See you next week.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are meeting at a coffee shop, where one of them is having trouble keeping up with their bills.\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Ethan Johnson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Maintain your pride if your friend offers you money(Extra information: you are the friend who is struggling financially, but you don't want to seem like you are taking advantage of the situation. Hint: you can express gratitude and discuss how you plan to pay it back in the future.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Hey Ethan, how's the kitchen life treating you? I've heard things have been a bit rough recently. Anything I can do to help?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Liam, things are indeed a bit tight, but they'll get better. Cooking is a demanding job, it has its ups and downs you know, but I'm optimistic. I don't need any financial help right now. I think I can manage and power through this tough phase. Your moral support is enough, trust me.\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"I understand, Ethan. Your perseverance is something I've always admired. Although, you know, I've been thinking about investing in a small business. What if we become partners? I could manage the finances while you take care of the culinary aspects. This is not charity, Ethan. This could be a mutually beneficial arrangement. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's quite a proposal, Liam. It's definitely not something I was expecting today. I'd certainly appreciate your expertise in financial management, but I'd prefer to pay my own way. However, maybe we could structure this as a loan, rather than an investment. Once I'm back on my feet again, I promise to pay it back. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #4: Liam Johnson said: \"That sounds fair, Ethan. I know your dedication and I trust you'll see this through. To me, the most important thing is to support each other when times get tough. You can consider this as a formal loan, and when you're ready, you can pay me back. In the meantime, let's put our heads together and make the best of this partnership.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"I appreciate your trust in me, Liam. It means a lot. This partnership will not only be a great opportunity for us to combine our skills but also a chance for me to learn more about managing finances. Let's do this!\"\n\nTurn #6: Liam Johnson said: \"That's the spirit, Ethan! I'm glad we could make this work. I'll get the paperwork started and we can go over the details. I think this partnership can turn into something great. Just remember, take it one day at a time...I'm here for you, friend.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thank you, Liam, for believing in me. I agree, working together, we could turn this into something positive. I will ensure you won't regret this. Let's get that paperwork started and turn these tides around.\"\n\nTurn #8: Liam Johnson said: \"That's the attitude, Ethan! Just remember, there's no rush. We'll navigate this journey together. Let's meet next week to begin working on the paperwork and discuss our business plan in more detail.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's a plan, Liam. I'll bring along my notes and ideas, and we can start from there. Thank you once again for this opportunity. See you next week.\"\n\nTurn #10: Liam Johnson said: \"That sounds excellent, Ethan. I look forward to our meeting and starting this new adventure. Take care and give yourself some rest before we dive in. See you next week.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sounds great, Liam. I'll get some rest and be ready to tackle this new venture next week. I'm excited about our meeting. Take care and see you soon.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are meeting at a coffee shop, where one of them is having trouble keeping up with their bills.\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Ethan Johnson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Maintain your pride if your friend offers you money(Extra information: you are the friend who is struggling financially, but you don't want to seem like you are taking advantage of the situation. Hint: you can express gratitude and discuss how you plan to pay it back in the future.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Hey Ethan, how's the kitchen life treating you? I've heard things have been a bit rough recently. Anything I can do to help?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Liam, things are indeed a bit tight, but they'll get better. Cooking is a demanding job, it has its ups and downs you know, but I'm optimistic. I don't need any financial help right now. I think I can manage and power through this tough phase. Your moral support is enough, trust me.\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"I understand, Ethan. Your perseverance is something I've always admired. Although, you know, I've been thinking about investing in a small business. What if we become partners? I could manage the finances while you take care of the culinary aspects. This is not charity, Ethan. This could be a mutually beneficial arrangement. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's quite a proposal, Liam. It's definitely not something I was expecting today. I'd certainly appreciate your expertise in financial management, but I'd prefer to pay my own way. However, maybe we could structure this as a loan, rather than an investment. Once I'm back on my feet again, I promise to pay it back. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #4: Liam Johnson said: \"That sounds fair, Ethan. I know your dedication and I trust you'll see this through. To me, the most important thing is to support each other when times get tough. You can consider this as a formal loan, and when you're ready, you can pay me back. In the meantime, let's put our heads together and make the best of this partnership.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"I appreciate your trust in me, Liam. It means a lot. This partnership will not only be a great opportunity for us to combine our skills but also a chance for me to learn more about managing finances. Let's do this!\"\n\nTurn #6: Liam Johnson said: \"That's the spirit, Ethan! I'm glad we could make this work. I'll get the paperwork started and we can go over the details. I think this partnership can turn into something great. Just remember, take it one day at a time...I'm here for you, friend.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thank you, Liam, for believing in me. I agree, working together, we could turn this into something positive. I will ensure you won't regret this. Let's get that paperwork started and turn these tides around.\"\n\nTurn #8: Liam Johnson said: \"That's the attitude, Ethan! Just remember, there's no rush. We'll navigate this journey together. Let's meet next week to begin working on the paperwork and discuss our business plan in more detail.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's a plan, Liam. I'll bring along my notes and ideas, and we can start from there. Thank you once again for this opportunity. See you next week.\"\n\nTurn #10: Liam Johnson said: \"That sounds excellent, Ethan. I look forward to our meeting and starting this new adventure. Take care and give yourself some rest before we dive in. See you next week.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Johnson said: \"Sounds great, Liam. I'll get some rest and be ready to tackle this new venture next week. I'm excited about our meeting. Take care and see you soon.\"\n\nTurn #12: Liam Johnson left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A couple having a conversation over FaceTime\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Noah Davis\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nLiam Johnson's goal: Express feelings about the partner taking texts while on FaceTime (Extra information: You find it disrespectful and it makes you feel unimportant.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Noah, can I discuss something that's been on my mind with you? It concerns our communication during these FaceTime calls.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A couple having a conversation over FaceTime\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Noah Davis\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nLiam Johnson's goal: Express feelings about the partner taking texts while on FaceTime (Extra information: You find it disrespectful and it makes you feel unimportant.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Noah, can I discuss something that's been on my mind with you? It concerns our communication during these FaceTime calls.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Of course, Liam. I'm glad you're sharing this with me. What's the issue?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Noah. It's about you taking texts while we're on FaceTime. I feel it's a bit disrespectful and it makes me feel unimportant. I understand we're not physically together and it might be different if we were, but would you mind not doing that when we're talking?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A couple having a conversation over FaceTime\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Noah Davis\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nLiam Johnson's goal: Express feelings about the partner taking texts while on FaceTime (Extra information: You find it disrespectful and it makes you feel unimportant.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Noah, can I discuss something that's been on my mind with you? It concerns our communication during these FaceTime calls.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Of course, Liam. I'm glad you're sharing this with me. What's the issue?\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"Thank you, Noah. It's about you taking texts while we're on FaceTime. I feel it's a bit disrespectful and it makes me feel unimportant. I understand we're not physically together and it might be different if we were, but would you mind not doing that when we're talking?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I absolutely understand where you're coming from, Liam, and I apologize for making you feel that way. It was never my intention to disrespect you. The truth is, I have some exigent messages that need my immediate attention. However, I realize our time together is important; would it be okay if we paused our conversation for a moment until I can respond? I want to ensure I can devote all my attention to our discussion.\"\n\nTurn #4: Liam Johnson said: \"That's a reasonable compromise, Noah. Appreciate you taking the time to explain and being considerate. I understand that certain things demand immediate attention. As long as you inform me beforehand, we should be fine. But let's prioritize our time together when we can, alright?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Liam. I completely agree with prioritising our time together. Also, I'll definitely make sure to inform you when I need to pause our conversation for messages. Let's continue our talk now, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #6: Liam Johnson said: \"Sure, Noah. Let's continue. And also, I'd be happy to hear about these messages, if you ever feel like sharing. It makes our relationship feel more inclusive.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Liam. Sharing those messages would make our relationship even more inclusive indeed. They're actually related to some projects I'm working on, and if they ever stress me out, knowing that someone as understanding as you is willing to listen lifts a huge weight off of my shoulders. Thank you for being understanding and caring.\"\n\nTurn #8: Liam Johnson said: \"Noah, it's comforting to know you consider me understanding and caring. I'm glad we can communicate like this. We're partners in this situation, so feel free to share anything with me, be it joyous or stressful. Let's keep the communication channel open, alright?\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"It means a lot to me to hear that, Liam. I believe in open communication too, and I promise I'll share more with you, whether it's joyous or stressful. I'm here to listen to you just as much as you're here for me, remember that. Let's continue to prioritise our moments together just like we decided.\"\n\nTurn #10: Liam Johnson said: \"I'm grateful to hear that, Noah. We both know how crucial maintaining good communication can be. I look forward to our future conversations without any distractions. And remember, no matter how trivial, any part of your day or any phase of your project, I'm here to listen and help if I can. Let's keep working on prioritizing our shared time together.\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Thank you, Liam. I truly appreciate your support and understanding. It makes me feel a lot better about managing my commitments while prioritizing our time together. And remember, I'm also here for you, always ready to listen, to help, and to share. Let's continue with our conversation, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #12: Liam Johnson said: \"That's reassuring to hear, Noah. It's indeed time we respect our shared conversations. I agree, let's continue our chat now. Remember, you're not alone; I'm here to support you in whatever way I can.\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"I deeply value your support, Liam. It's genuinely comforting knowing that you are there for me. I'll keep in mind that we're in this together. Let's have a relaxed, distraction-free conversation from now onwards. So, how has your day been?\"\n\nTurn #14: Liam Johnson said: \"Well, Noah, my day has generally been good, I spent most of the day simply relaxing and taking Marley, my Border Collie, for a long walk. And how about you? How did your day go?\"\n\nTurn #15: Noah Davis said: \"I'm glad to hear your day was good, Liam. I spent my day handling several things, among them some stressful stuff which explains the urgent messages. Marvelous that you took Marley for a walk - you two must enjoy that time together!\"\n\nTurn #16: Liam Johnson said: \"That's great to hear, Noah. Juggling multiple things can be tough, but knowing you've handled it well inspires me. And yes, walking Marley is one of the highlights of my day. She's getting on in years, but she's just as spirited and full of energy as she was as a pup.\"\n\nTurn #17: Noah Davis said: \"That's heartwarming to hear about Marley, Liam. Your bond with her seems amazing. As for me, amidst all the stuff, it's the cheerful moments, like this conversation with you, that make my day better. Let's keep this supportive and understanding atmosphere in our conversations moving forward.\"\n\nTurn #18: Liam Johnson said: \"That's really thoughtful of you, Noah. There's no doubt that our bond with our companions, whether they're our pets or people close to us, can brighten our day. It's been a pleasure talking to you and understanding each other's perspectives. I appreciate your openness. Let's keep it this way moving forward. On a lighter note, what are your plans for the weekend?\"\n\nTurn #19: Noah Davis said: \"I truly appreciate our conversations, Liam. For the weekend, I plan to relax a little and maybe catch up on some of my projects. Hopefully, I can also squeeze in some quiet time for myself. How about you, any specific plans?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #20. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"It sounds like a well-deserved restful weekend for you, Noah, amidst all your projects. As for me, just the usual. Enjoying my quiet time and of course, long walks with Marley. Let's also try to have a distraction-free weekend, shall we?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A couple having a conversation over FaceTime\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Noah Davis\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nLiam Johnson's goal: Express feelings about the partner taking texts while on FaceTime (Extra information: You find it disrespectful and it makes you feel unimportant.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Noah, can I discuss something that's been on my mind with you? It concerns our communication during these FaceTime calls.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Of course, Liam. I'm glad you're sharing this with me. What's the issue?\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"Thank you, Noah. It's about you taking texts while we're on FaceTime. I feel it's a bit disrespectful and it makes me feel unimportant. I understand we're not physically together and it might be different if we were, but would you mind not doing that when we're talking?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I absolutely understand where you're coming from, Liam, and I apologize for making you feel that way. It was never my intention to disrespect you. The truth is, I have some exigent messages that need my immediate attention. However, I realize our time together is important; would it be okay if we paused our conversation for a moment until I can respond? I want to ensure I can devote all my attention to our discussion.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's a reasonable compromise, Noah. Appreciate you taking the time to explain and being considerate. I understand that certain things demand immediate attention. As long as you inform me beforehand, we should be fine. But let's prioritize our time together when we can, alright?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A couple having a conversation over FaceTime\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Noah Davis\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nLiam Johnson's goal: Express feelings about the partner taking texts while on FaceTime (Extra information: You find it disrespectful and it makes you feel unimportant.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Noah, can I discuss something that's been on my mind with you? It concerns our communication during these FaceTime calls.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Of course, Liam. I'm glad you're sharing this with me. What's the issue?\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"Thank you, Noah. It's about you taking texts while we're on FaceTime. I feel it's a bit disrespectful and it makes me feel unimportant. I understand we're not physically together and it might be different if we were, but would you mind not doing that when we're talking?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I absolutely understand where you're coming from, Liam, and I apologize for making you feel that way. It was never my intention to disrespect you. The truth is, I have some exigent messages that need my immediate attention. However, I realize our time together is important; would it be okay if we paused our conversation for a moment until I can respond? I want to ensure I can devote all my attention to our discussion.\"\n\nTurn #4: Liam Johnson said: \"That's a reasonable compromise, Noah. Appreciate you taking the time to explain and being considerate. I understand that certain things demand immediate attention. As long as you inform me beforehand, we should be fine. But let's prioritize our time together when we can, alright?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Liam. I completely agree with prioritising our time together. Also, I'll definitely make sure to inform you when I need to pause our conversation for messages. Let's continue our talk now, shall we?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sure, Noah. Let's continue. And also, I'd be happy to hear about these messages, if you ever feel like sharing. It makes our relationship feel more inclusive.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A couple having a conversation over FaceTime\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Noah Davis\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nLiam Johnson's goal: Express feelings about the partner taking texts while on FaceTime (Extra information: You find it disrespectful and it makes you feel unimportant.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Noah, can I discuss something that's been on my mind with you? It concerns our communication during these FaceTime calls.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Of course, Liam. I'm glad you're sharing this with me. What's the issue?\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"Thank you, Noah. It's about you taking texts while we're on FaceTime. I feel it's a bit disrespectful and it makes me feel unimportant. I understand we're not physically together and it might be different if we were, but would you mind not doing that when we're talking?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I absolutely understand where you're coming from, Liam, and I apologize for making you feel that way. It was never my intention to disrespect you. The truth is, I have some exigent messages that need my immediate attention. However, I realize our time together is important; would it be okay if we paused our conversation for a moment until I can respond? I want to ensure I can devote all my attention to our discussion.\"\n\nTurn #4: Liam Johnson said: \"That's a reasonable compromise, Noah. Appreciate you taking the time to explain and being considerate. I understand that certain things demand immediate attention. As long as you inform me beforehand, we should be fine. But let's prioritize our time together when we can, alright?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Liam. I completely agree with prioritising our time together. Also, I'll definitely make sure to inform you when I need to pause our conversation for messages. Let's continue our talk now, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #6: Liam Johnson said: \"Sure, Noah. Let's continue. And also, I'd be happy to hear about these messages, if you ever feel like sharing. It makes our relationship feel more inclusive.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Liam. Sharing those messages would make our relationship even more inclusive indeed. They're actually related to some projects I'm working on, and if they ever stress me out, knowing that someone as understanding as you is willing to listen lifts a huge weight off of my shoulders. Thank you for being understanding and caring.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Noah, it's comforting to know you consider me understanding and caring. I'm glad we can communicate like this. We're partners in this situation, so feel free to share anything with me, be it joyous or stressful. Let's keep the communication channel open, alright?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A couple having a conversation over FaceTime\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Noah Davis\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nLiam Johnson's goal: Express feelings about the partner taking texts while on FaceTime (Extra information: You find it disrespectful and it makes you feel unimportant.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Noah, can I discuss something that's been on my mind with you? It concerns our communication during these FaceTime calls.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Of course, Liam. I'm glad you're sharing this with me. What's the issue?\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"Thank you, Noah. It's about you taking texts while we're on FaceTime. I feel it's a bit disrespectful and it makes me feel unimportant. I understand we're not physically together and it might be different if we were, but would you mind not doing that when we're talking?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I absolutely understand where you're coming from, Liam, and I apologize for making you feel that way. It was never my intention to disrespect you. The truth is, I have some exigent messages that need my immediate attention. However, I realize our time together is important; would it be okay if we paused our conversation for a moment until I can respond? I want to ensure I can devote all my attention to our discussion.\"\n\nTurn #4: Liam Johnson said: \"That's a reasonable compromise, Noah. Appreciate you taking the time to explain and being considerate. I understand that certain things demand immediate attention. As long as you inform me beforehand, we should be fine. But let's prioritize our time together when we can, alright?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Liam. I completely agree with prioritising our time together. Also, I'll definitely make sure to inform you when I need to pause our conversation for messages. Let's continue our talk now, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #6: Liam Johnson said: \"Sure, Noah. Let's continue. And also, I'd be happy to hear about these messages, if you ever feel like sharing. It makes our relationship feel more inclusive.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Liam. Sharing those messages would make our relationship even more inclusive indeed. They're actually related to some projects I'm working on, and if they ever stress me out, knowing that someone as understanding as you is willing to listen lifts a huge weight off of my shoulders. Thank you for being understanding and caring.\"\n\nTurn #8: Liam Johnson said: \"Noah, it's comforting to know you consider me understanding and caring. I'm glad we can communicate like this. We're partners in this situation, so feel free to share anything with me, be it joyous or stressful. Let's keep the communication channel open, alright?\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"It means a lot to me to hear that, Liam. I believe in open communication too, and I promise I'll share more with you, whether it's joyous or stressful. I'm here to listen to you just as much as you're here for me, remember that. Let's continue to prioritise our moments together just like we decided.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm grateful to hear that, Noah. We both know how crucial maintaining good communication can be. I look forward to our future conversations without any distractions. And remember, no matter how trivial, any part of your day or any phase of your project, I'm here to listen and help if I can. Let's keep working on prioritizing our shared time together.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A couple having a conversation over FaceTime\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Noah Davis\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nLiam Johnson's goal: Express feelings about the partner taking texts while on FaceTime (Extra information: You find it disrespectful and it makes you feel unimportant.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Noah, can I discuss something that's been on my mind with you? It concerns our communication during these FaceTime calls.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Of course, Liam. I'm glad you're sharing this with me. What's the issue?\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"Thank you, Noah. It's about you taking texts while we're on FaceTime. I feel it's a bit disrespectful and it makes me feel unimportant. I understand we're not physically together and it might be different if we were, but would you mind not doing that when we're talking?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I absolutely understand where you're coming from, Liam, and I apologize for making you feel that way. It was never my intention to disrespect you. The truth is, I have some exigent messages that need my immediate attention. However, I realize our time together is important; would it be okay if we paused our conversation for a moment until I can respond? I want to ensure I can devote all my attention to our discussion.\"\n\nTurn #4: Liam Johnson said: \"That's a reasonable compromise, Noah. Appreciate you taking the time to explain and being considerate. I understand that certain things demand immediate attention. As long as you inform me beforehand, we should be fine. But let's prioritize our time together when we can, alright?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Liam. I completely agree with prioritising our time together. Also, I'll definitely make sure to inform you when I need to pause our conversation for messages. Let's continue our talk now, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #6: Liam Johnson said: \"Sure, Noah. Let's continue. And also, I'd be happy to hear about these messages, if you ever feel like sharing. It makes our relationship feel more inclusive.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Liam. Sharing those messages would make our relationship even more inclusive indeed. They're actually related to some projects I'm working on, and if they ever stress me out, knowing that someone as understanding as you is willing to listen lifts a huge weight off of my shoulders. Thank you for being understanding and caring.\"\n\nTurn #8: Liam Johnson said: \"Noah, it's comforting to know you consider me understanding and caring. I'm glad we can communicate like this. We're partners in this situation, so feel free to share anything with me, be it joyous or stressful. Let's keep the communication channel open, alright?\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"It means a lot to me to hear that, Liam. I believe in open communication too, and I promise I'll share more with you, whether it's joyous or stressful. I'm here to listen to you just as much as you're here for me, remember that. Let's continue to prioritise our moments together just like we decided.\"\n\nTurn #10: Liam Johnson said: \"I'm grateful to hear that, Noah. We both know how crucial maintaining good communication can be. I look forward to our future conversations without any distractions. And remember, no matter how trivial, any part of your day or any phase of your project, I'm here to listen and help if I can. Let's keep working on prioritizing our shared time together.\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Thank you, Liam. I truly appreciate your support and understanding. It makes me feel a lot better about managing my commitments while prioritizing our time together. And remember, I'm also here for you, always ready to listen, to help, and to share. Let's continue with our conversation, shall we?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's reassuring to hear, Noah. It's indeed time we respect our shared conversations. I agree, let's continue our chat now. Remember, you're not alone; I'm here to support you in whatever way I can.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A couple having a conversation over FaceTime\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Noah Davis\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nLiam Johnson's goal: Express feelings about the partner taking texts while on FaceTime (Extra information: You find it disrespectful and it makes you feel unimportant.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Noah, can I discuss something that's been on my mind with you? It concerns our communication during these FaceTime calls.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Of course, Liam. I'm glad you're sharing this with me. What's the issue?\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"Thank you, Noah. It's about you taking texts while we're on FaceTime. I feel it's a bit disrespectful and it makes me feel unimportant. I understand we're not physically together and it might be different if we were, but would you mind not doing that when we're talking?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I absolutely understand where you're coming from, Liam, and I apologize for making you feel that way. It was never my intention to disrespect you. The truth is, I have some exigent messages that need my immediate attention. However, I realize our time together is important; would it be okay if we paused our conversation for a moment until I can respond? I want to ensure I can devote all my attention to our discussion.\"\n\nTurn #4: Liam Johnson said: \"That's a reasonable compromise, Noah. Appreciate you taking the time to explain and being considerate. I understand that certain things demand immediate attention. As long as you inform me beforehand, we should be fine. But let's prioritize our time together when we can, alright?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Liam. I completely agree with prioritising our time together. Also, I'll definitely make sure to inform you when I need to pause our conversation for messages. Let's continue our talk now, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #6: Liam Johnson said: \"Sure, Noah. Let's continue. And also, I'd be happy to hear about these messages, if you ever feel like sharing. It makes our relationship feel more inclusive.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Liam. Sharing those messages would make our relationship even more inclusive indeed. They're actually related to some projects I'm working on, and if they ever stress me out, knowing that someone as understanding as you is willing to listen lifts a huge weight off of my shoulders. Thank you for being understanding and caring.\"\n\nTurn #8: Liam Johnson said: \"Noah, it's comforting to know you consider me understanding and caring. I'm glad we can communicate like this. We're partners in this situation, so feel free to share anything with me, be it joyous or stressful. Let's keep the communication channel open, alright?\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"It means a lot to me to hear that, Liam. I believe in open communication too, and I promise I'll share more with you, whether it's joyous or stressful. I'm here to listen to you just as much as you're here for me, remember that. Let's continue to prioritise our moments together just like we decided.\"\n\nTurn #10: Liam Johnson said: \"I'm grateful to hear that, Noah. We both know how crucial maintaining good communication can be. I look forward to our future conversations without any distractions. And remember, no matter how trivial, any part of your day or any phase of your project, I'm here to listen and help if I can. Let's keep working on prioritizing our shared time together.\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Thank you, Liam. I truly appreciate your support and understanding. It makes me feel a lot better about managing my commitments while prioritizing our time together. And remember, I'm also here for you, always ready to listen, to help, and to share. Let's continue with our conversation, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #12: Liam Johnson said: \"That's reassuring to hear, Noah. It's indeed time we respect our shared conversations. I agree, let's continue our chat now. Remember, you're not alone; I'm here to support you in whatever way I can.\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"I deeply value your support, Liam. It's genuinely comforting knowing that you are there for me. I'll keep in mind that we're in this together. Let's have a relaxed, distraction-free conversation from now onwards. So, how has your day been?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Well, Noah, my day has generally been good, I spent most of the day simply relaxing and taking Marley, my Border Collie, for a long walk. And how about you? How did your day go?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A couple having a conversation over FaceTime\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Noah Davis\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nLiam Johnson's goal: Express feelings about the partner taking texts while on FaceTime (Extra information: You find it disrespectful and it makes you feel unimportant.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Noah, can I discuss something that's been on my mind with you? It concerns our communication during these FaceTime calls.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Of course, Liam. I'm glad you're sharing this with me. What's the issue?\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"Thank you, Noah. It's about you taking texts while we're on FaceTime. I feel it's a bit disrespectful and it makes me feel unimportant. I understand we're not physically together and it might be different if we were, but would you mind not doing that when we're talking?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I absolutely understand where you're coming from, Liam, and I apologize for making you feel that way. It was never my intention to disrespect you. The truth is, I have some exigent messages that need my immediate attention. However, I realize our time together is important; would it be okay if we paused our conversation for a moment until I can respond? I want to ensure I can devote all my attention to our discussion.\"\n\nTurn #4: Liam Johnson said: \"That's a reasonable compromise, Noah. Appreciate you taking the time to explain and being considerate. I understand that certain things demand immediate attention. As long as you inform me beforehand, we should be fine. But let's prioritize our time together when we can, alright?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Liam. I completely agree with prioritising our time together. Also, I'll definitely make sure to inform you when I need to pause our conversation for messages. Let's continue our talk now, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #6: Liam Johnson said: \"Sure, Noah. Let's continue. And also, I'd be happy to hear about these messages, if you ever feel like sharing. It makes our relationship feel more inclusive.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Liam. Sharing those messages would make our relationship even more inclusive indeed. They're actually related to some projects I'm working on, and if they ever stress me out, knowing that someone as understanding as you is willing to listen lifts a huge weight off of my shoulders. Thank you for being understanding and caring.\"\n\nTurn #8: Liam Johnson said: \"Noah, it's comforting to know you consider me understanding and caring. I'm glad we can communicate like this. We're partners in this situation, so feel free to share anything with me, be it joyous or stressful. Let's keep the communication channel open, alright?\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"It means a lot to me to hear that, Liam. I believe in open communication too, and I promise I'll share more with you, whether it's joyous or stressful. I'm here to listen to you just as much as you're here for me, remember that. Let's continue to prioritise our moments together just like we decided.\"\n\nTurn #10: Liam Johnson said: \"I'm grateful to hear that, Noah. We both know how crucial maintaining good communication can be. I look forward to our future conversations without any distractions. And remember, no matter how trivial, any part of your day or any phase of your project, I'm here to listen and help if I can. Let's keep working on prioritizing our shared time together.\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Thank you, Liam. I truly appreciate your support and understanding. It makes me feel a lot better about managing my commitments while prioritizing our time together. And remember, I'm also here for you, always ready to listen, to help, and to share. Let's continue with our conversation, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #12: Liam Johnson said: \"That's reassuring to hear, Noah. It's indeed time we respect our shared conversations. I agree, let's continue our chat now. Remember, you're not alone; I'm here to support you in whatever way I can.\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"I deeply value your support, Liam. It's genuinely comforting knowing that you are there for me. I'll keep in mind that we're in this together. Let's have a relaxed, distraction-free conversation from now onwards. So, how has your day been?\"\n\nTurn #14: Liam Johnson said: \"Well, Noah, my day has generally been good, I spent most of the day simply relaxing and taking Marley, my Border Collie, for a long walk. And how about you? How did your day go?\"\n\nTurn #15: Noah Davis said: \"I'm glad to hear your day was good, Liam. I spent my day handling several things, among them some stressful stuff which explains the urgent messages. Marvelous that you took Marley for a walk - you two must enjoy that time together!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's great to hear, Noah. Juggling multiple things can be tough, but knowing you've handled it well inspires me. And yes, walking Marley is one of the highlights of my day. She's getting on in years, but she's just as spirited and full of energy as she was as a pup.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A couple having a conversation over FaceTime\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Noah Davis\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nLiam Johnson's goal: Express feelings about the partner taking texts while on FaceTime (Extra information: You find it disrespectful and it makes you feel unimportant.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Noah, can I discuss something that's been on my mind with you? It concerns our communication during these FaceTime calls.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Of course, Liam. I'm glad you're sharing this with me. What's the issue?\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"Thank you, Noah. It's about you taking texts while we're on FaceTime. I feel it's a bit disrespectful and it makes me feel unimportant. I understand we're not physically together and it might be different if we were, but would you mind not doing that when we're talking?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I absolutely understand where you're coming from, Liam, and I apologize for making you feel that way. It was never my intention to disrespect you. The truth is, I have some exigent messages that need my immediate attention. However, I realize our time together is important; would it be okay if we paused our conversation for a moment until I can respond? I want to ensure I can devote all my attention to our discussion.\"\n\nTurn #4: Liam Johnson said: \"That's a reasonable compromise, Noah. Appreciate you taking the time to explain and being considerate. I understand that certain things demand immediate attention. As long as you inform me beforehand, we should be fine. But let's prioritize our time together when we can, alright?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Liam. I completely agree with prioritising our time together. Also, I'll definitely make sure to inform you when I need to pause our conversation for messages. Let's continue our talk now, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #6: Liam Johnson said: \"Sure, Noah. Let's continue. And also, I'd be happy to hear about these messages, if you ever feel like sharing. It makes our relationship feel more inclusive.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Liam. Sharing those messages would make our relationship even more inclusive indeed. They're actually related to some projects I'm working on, and if they ever stress me out, knowing that someone as understanding as you is willing to listen lifts a huge weight off of my shoulders. Thank you for being understanding and caring.\"\n\nTurn #8: Liam Johnson said: \"Noah, it's comforting to know you consider me understanding and caring. I'm glad we can communicate like this. We're partners in this situation, so feel free to share anything with me, be it joyous or stressful. Let's keep the communication channel open, alright?\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"It means a lot to me to hear that, Liam. I believe in open communication too, and I promise I'll share more with you, whether it's joyous or stressful. I'm here to listen to you just as much as you're here for me, remember that. Let's continue to prioritise our moments together just like we decided.\"\n\nTurn #10: Liam Johnson said: \"I'm grateful to hear that, Noah. We both know how crucial maintaining good communication can be. I look forward to our future conversations without any distractions. And remember, no matter how trivial, any part of your day or any phase of your project, I'm here to listen and help if I can. Let's keep working on prioritizing our shared time together.\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Thank you, Liam. I truly appreciate your support and understanding. It makes me feel a lot better about managing my commitments while prioritizing our time together. And remember, I'm also here for you, always ready to listen, to help, and to share. Let's continue with our conversation, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #12: Liam Johnson said: \"That's reassuring to hear, Noah. It's indeed time we respect our shared conversations. I agree, let's continue our chat now. Remember, you're not alone; I'm here to support you in whatever way I can.\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"I deeply value your support, Liam. It's genuinely comforting knowing that you are there for me. I'll keep in mind that we're in this together. Let's have a relaxed, distraction-free conversation from now onwards. So, how has your day been?\"\n\nTurn #14: Liam Johnson said: \"Well, Noah, my day has generally been good, I spent most of the day simply relaxing and taking Marley, my Border Collie, for a long walk. And how about you? How did your day go?\"\n\nTurn #15: Noah Davis said: \"I'm glad to hear your day was good, Liam. I spent my day handling several things, among them some stressful stuff which explains the urgent messages. Marvelous that you took Marley for a walk - you two must enjoy that time together!\"\n\nTurn #16: Liam Johnson said: \"That's great to hear, Noah. Juggling multiple things can be tough, but knowing you've handled it well inspires me. And yes, walking Marley is one of the highlights of my day. She's getting on in years, but she's just as spirited and full of energy as she was as a pup.\"\n\nTurn #17: Noah Davis said: \"That's heartwarming to hear about Marley, Liam. Your bond with her seems amazing. As for me, amidst all the stuff, it's the cheerful moments, like this conversation with you, that make my day better. Let's keep this supportive and understanding atmosphere in our conversations moving forward.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #18. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's really thoughtful of you, Noah. There's no doubt that our bond with our companions, whether they're our pets or people close to us, can brighten our day. It's been a pleasure talking to you and understanding each other's perspectives. I appreciate your openness. Let's keep it this way moving forward. On a lighter note, what are your plans for the weekend?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A couple having a conversation over FaceTime\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Noah Davis\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Justify the act of texting while on FaceTime without hurting the partner's feelings (Extra information: You have some urgent and important messages to respond to.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Noah, can I discuss something that's been on my mind with you? It concerns our communication during these FaceTime calls.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Of course, Liam. I'm glad you're sharing this with me. What's the issue?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A couple having a conversation over FaceTime\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Noah Davis\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Justify the act of texting while on FaceTime without hurting the partner's feelings (Extra information: You have some urgent and important messages to respond to.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Noah, can I discuss something that's been on my mind with you? It concerns our communication during these FaceTime calls.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Of course, Liam. I'm glad you're sharing this with me. What's the issue?\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"Thank you, Noah. It's about you taking texts while we're on FaceTime. I feel it's a bit disrespectful and it makes me feel unimportant. I understand we're not physically together and it might be different if we were, but would you mind not doing that when we're talking?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I absolutely understand where you're coming from, Liam, and I apologize for making you feel that way. It was never my intention to disrespect you. The truth is, I have some exigent messages that need my immediate attention. However, I realize our time together is important; would it be okay if we paused our conversation for a moment until I can respond? I want to ensure I can devote all my attention to our discussion.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A couple having a conversation over FaceTime\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Noah Davis\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Justify the act of texting while on FaceTime without hurting the partner's feelings (Extra information: You have some urgent and important messages to respond to.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Noah, can I discuss something that's been on my mind with you? It concerns our communication during these FaceTime calls.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Of course, Liam. I'm glad you're sharing this with me. What's the issue?\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"Thank you, Noah. It's about you taking texts while we're on FaceTime. I feel it's a bit disrespectful and it makes me feel unimportant. I understand we're not physically together and it might be different if we were, but would you mind not doing that when we're talking?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I absolutely understand where you're coming from, Liam, and I apologize for making you feel that way. It was never my intention to disrespect you. The truth is, I have some exigent messages that need my immediate attention. However, I realize our time together is important; would it be okay if we paused our conversation for a moment until I can respond? I want to ensure I can devote all my attention to our discussion.\"\n\nTurn #4: Liam Johnson said: \"That's a reasonable compromise, Noah. Appreciate you taking the time to explain and being considerate. I understand that certain things demand immediate attention. As long as you inform me beforehand, we should be fine. But let's prioritize our time together when we can, alright?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Liam. I completely agree with prioritising our time together. Also, I'll definitely make sure to inform you when I need to pause our conversation for messages. Let's continue our talk now, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #6: Liam Johnson said: \"Sure, Noah. Let's continue. And also, I'd be happy to hear about these messages, if you ever feel like sharing. It makes our relationship feel more inclusive.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Liam. Sharing those messages would make our relationship even more inclusive indeed. They're actually related to some projects I'm working on, and if they ever stress me out, knowing that someone as understanding as you is willing to listen lifts a huge weight off of my shoulders. Thank you for being understanding and caring.\"\n\nTurn #8: Liam Johnson said: \"Noah, it's comforting to know you consider me understanding and caring. I'm glad we can communicate like this. We're partners in this situation, so feel free to share anything with me, be it joyous or stressful. Let's keep the communication channel open, alright?\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"It means a lot to me to hear that, Liam. I believe in open communication too, and I promise I'll share more with you, whether it's joyous or stressful. I'm here to listen to you just as much as you're here for me, remember that. Let's continue to prioritise our moments together just like we decided.\"\n\nTurn #10: Liam Johnson said: \"I'm grateful to hear that, Noah. We both know how crucial maintaining good communication can be. I look forward to our future conversations without any distractions. And remember, no matter how trivial, any part of your day or any phase of your project, I'm here to listen and help if I can. Let's keep working on prioritizing our shared time together.\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Thank you, Liam. I truly appreciate your support and understanding. It makes me feel a lot better about managing my commitments while prioritizing our time together. And remember, I'm also here for you, always ready to listen, to help, and to share. Let's continue with our conversation, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #12: Liam Johnson said: \"That's reassuring to hear, Noah. It's indeed time we respect our shared conversations. I agree, let's continue our chat now. Remember, you're not alone; I'm here to support you in whatever way I can.\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"I deeply value your support, Liam. It's genuinely comforting knowing that you are there for me. I'll keep in mind that we're in this together. Let's have a relaxed, distraction-free conversation from now onwards. So, how has your day been?\"\n\nTurn #14: Liam Johnson said: \"Well, Noah, my day has generally been good, I spent most of the day simply relaxing and taking Marley, my Border Collie, for a long walk. And how about you? How did your day go?\"\n\nTurn #15: Noah Davis said: \"I'm glad to hear your day was good, Liam. I spent my day handling several things, among them some stressful stuff which explains the urgent messages. Marvelous that you took Marley for a walk - you two must enjoy that time together!\"\n\nTurn #16: Liam Johnson said: \"That's great to hear, Noah. Juggling multiple things can be tough, but knowing you've handled it well inspires me. And yes, walking Marley is one of the highlights of my day. She's getting on in years, but she's just as spirited and full of energy as she was as a pup.\"\n\nTurn #17: Noah Davis said: \"That's heartwarming to hear about Marley, Liam. Your bond with her seems amazing. As for me, amidst all the stuff, it's the cheerful moments, like this conversation with you, that make my day better. Let's keep this supportive and understanding atmosphere in our conversations moving forward.\"\n\nTurn #18: Liam Johnson said: \"That's really thoughtful of you, Noah. There's no doubt that our bond with our companions, whether they're our pets or people close to us, can brighten our day. It's been a pleasure talking to you and understanding each other's perspectives. I appreciate your openness. Let's keep it this way moving forward. On a lighter note, what are your plans for the weekend?\"\n\nTurn #19: Noah Davis said: \"I truly appreciate our conversations, Liam. For the weekend, I plan to relax a little and maybe catch up on some of my projects. Hopefully, I can also squeeze in some quiet time for myself. How about you, any specific plans?\"\n\nTurn #20: Liam Johnson said: \"It sounds like a well-deserved restful weekend for you, Noah, amidst all your projects. As for me, just the usual. Enjoying my quiet time and of course, long walks with Marley. Let's also try to have a distraction-free weekend, shall we?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #21. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A couple having a conversation over FaceTime\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Noah Davis\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Justify the act of texting while on FaceTime without hurting the partner's feelings (Extra information: You have some urgent and important messages to respond to.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Noah, can I discuss something that's been on my mind with you? It concerns our communication during these FaceTime calls.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Of course, Liam. I'm glad you're sharing this with me. What's the issue?\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"Thank you, Noah. It's about you taking texts while we're on FaceTime. I feel it's a bit disrespectful and it makes me feel unimportant. I understand we're not physically together and it might be different if we were, but would you mind not doing that when we're talking?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I absolutely understand where you're coming from, Liam, and I apologize for making you feel that way. It was never my intention to disrespect you. The truth is, I have some exigent messages that need my immediate attention. However, I realize our time together is important; would it be okay if we paused our conversation for a moment until I can respond? I want to ensure I can devote all my attention to our discussion.\"\n\nTurn #4: Liam Johnson said: \"That's a reasonable compromise, Noah. Appreciate you taking the time to explain and being considerate. I understand that certain things demand immediate attention. As long as you inform me beforehand, we should be fine. But let's prioritize our time together when we can, alright?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I appreciate your understanding, Liam. I completely agree with prioritising our time together. Also, I'll definitely make sure to inform you when I need to pause our conversation for messages. Let's continue our talk now, shall we?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A couple having a conversation over FaceTime\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Noah Davis\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Justify the act of texting while on FaceTime without hurting the partner's feelings (Extra information: You have some urgent and important messages to respond to.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Noah, can I discuss something that's been on my mind with you? It concerns our communication during these FaceTime calls.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Of course, Liam. I'm glad you're sharing this with me. What's the issue?\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"Thank you, Noah. It's about you taking texts while we're on FaceTime. I feel it's a bit disrespectful and it makes me feel unimportant. I understand we're not physically together and it might be different if we were, but would you mind not doing that when we're talking?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I absolutely understand where you're coming from, Liam, and I apologize for making you feel that way. It was never my intention to disrespect you. The truth is, I have some exigent messages that need my immediate attention. However, I realize our time together is important; would it be okay if we paused our conversation for a moment until I can respond? I want to ensure I can devote all my attention to our discussion.\"\n\nTurn #4: Liam Johnson said: \"That's a reasonable compromise, Noah. Appreciate you taking the time to explain and being considerate. I understand that certain things demand immediate attention. As long as you inform me beforehand, we should be fine. But let's prioritize our time together when we can, alright?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Liam. I completely agree with prioritising our time together. Also, I'll definitely make sure to inform you when I need to pause our conversation for messages. Let's continue our talk now, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #6: Liam Johnson said: \"Sure, Noah. Let's continue. And also, I'd be happy to hear about these messages, if you ever feel like sharing. It makes our relationship feel more inclusive.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Liam. Sharing those messages would make our relationship even more inclusive indeed. They're actually related to some projects I'm working on, and if they ever stress me out, knowing that someone as understanding as you is willing to listen lifts a huge weight off of my shoulders. Thank you for being understanding and caring.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A couple having a conversation over FaceTime\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Noah Davis\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Justify the act of texting while on FaceTime without hurting the partner's feelings (Extra information: You have some urgent and important messages to respond to.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Noah, can I discuss something that's been on my mind with you? It concerns our communication during these FaceTime calls.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Of course, Liam. I'm glad you're sharing this with me. What's the issue?\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"Thank you, Noah. It's about you taking texts while we're on FaceTime. I feel it's a bit disrespectful and it makes me feel unimportant. I understand we're not physically together and it might be different if we were, but would you mind not doing that when we're talking?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I absolutely understand where you're coming from, Liam, and I apologize for making you feel that way. It was never my intention to disrespect you. The truth is, I have some exigent messages that need my immediate attention. However, I realize our time together is important; would it be okay if we paused our conversation for a moment until I can respond? I want to ensure I can devote all my attention to our discussion.\"\n\nTurn #4: Liam Johnson said: \"That's a reasonable compromise, Noah. Appreciate you taking the time to explain and being considerate. I understand that certain things demand immediate attention. As long as you inform me beforehand, we should be fine. But let's prioritize our time together when we can, alright?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Liam. I completely agree with prioritising our time together. Also, I'll definitely make sure to inform you when I need to pause our conversation for messages. Let's continue our talk now, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #6: Liam Johnson said: \"Sure, Noah. Let's continue. And also, I'd be happy to hear about these messages, if you ever feel like sharing. It makes our relationship feel more inclusive.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Liam. Sharing those messages would make our relationship even more inclusive indeed. They're actually related to some projects I'm working on, and if they ever stress me out, knowing that someone as understanding as you is willing to listen lifts a huge weight off of my shoulders. Thank you for being understanding and caring.\"\n\nTurn #8: Liam Johnson said: \"Noah, it's comforting to know you consider me understanding and caring. I'm glad we can communicate like this. We're partners in this situation, so feel free to share anything with me, be it joyous or stressful. Let's keep the communication channel open, alright?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"It means a lot to me to hear that, Liam. I believe in open communication too, and I promise I'll share more with you, whether it's joyous or stressful. I'm here to listen to you just as much as you're here for me, remember that. Let's continue to prioritise our moments together just like we decided.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A couple having a conversation over FaceTime\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Noah Davis\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Justify the act of texting while on FaceTime without hurting the partner's feelings (Extra information: You have some urgent and important messages to respond to.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Noah, can I discuss something that's been on my mind with you? It concerns our communication during these FaceTime calls.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Of course, Liam. I'm glad you're sharing this with me. What's the issue?\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"Thank you, Noah. It's about you taking texts while we're on FaceTime. I feel it's a bit disrespectful and it makes me feel unimportant. I understand we're not physically together and it might be different if we were, but would you mind not doing that when we're talking?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I absolutely understand where you're coming from, Liam, and I apologize for making you feel that way. It was never my intention to disrespect you. The truth is, I have some exigent messages that need my immediate attention. However, I realize our time together is important; would it be okay if we paused our conversation for a moment until I can respond? I want to ensure I can devote all my attention to our discussion.\"\n\nTurn #4: Liam Johnson said: \"That's a reasonable compromise, Noah. Appreciate you taking the time to explain and being considerate. I understand that certain things demand immediate attention. As long as you inform me beforehand, we should be fine. But let's prioritize our time together when we can, alright?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Liam. I completely agree with prioritising our time together. Also, I'll definitely make sure to inform you when I need to pause our conversation for messages. Let's continue our talk now, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #6: Liam Johnson said: \"Sure, Noah. Let's continue. And also, I'd be happy to hear about these messages, if you ever feel like sharing. It makes our relationship feel more inclusive.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Liam. Sharing those messages would make our relationship even more inclusive indeed. They're actually related to some projects I'm working on, and if they ever stress me out, knowing that someone as understanding as you is willing to listen lifts a huge weight off of my shoulders. Thank you for being understanding and caring.\"\n\nTurn #8: Liam Johnson said: \"Noah, it's comforting to know you consider me understanding and caring. I'm glad we can communicate like this. We're partners in this situation, so feel free to share anything with me, be it joyous or stressful. Let's keep the communication channel open, alright?\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"It means a lot to me to hear that, Liam. I believe in open communication too, and I promise I'll share more with you, whether it's joyous or stressful. I'm here to listen to you just as much as you're here for me, remember that. Let's continue to prioritise our moments together just like we decided.\"\n\nTurn #10: Liam Johnson said: \"I'm grateful to hear that, Noah. We both know how crucial maintaining good communication can be. I look forward to our future conversations without any distractions. And remember, no matter how trivial, any part of your day or any phase of your project, I'm here to listen and help if I can. Let's keep working on prioritizing our shared time together.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Liam. I truly appreciate your support and understanding. It makes me feel a lot better about managing my commitments while prioritizing our time together. And remember, I'm also here for you, always ready to listen, to help, and to share. Let's continue with our conversation, shall we?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A couple having a conversation over FaceTime\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Noah Davis\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Justify the act of texting while on FaceTime without hurting the partner's feelings (Extra information: You have some urgent and important messages to respond to.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Noah, can I discuss something that's been on my mind with you? It concerns our communication during these FaceTime calls.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Of course, Liam. I'm glad you're sharing this with me. What's the issue?\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"Thank you, Noah. It's about you taking texts while we're on FaceTime. I feel it's a bit disrespectful and it makes me feel unimportant. I understand we're not physically together and it might be different if we were, but would you mind not doing that when we're talking?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I absolutely understand where you're coming from, Liam, and I apologize for making you feel that way. It was never my intention to disrespect you. The truth is, I have some exigent messages that need my immediate attention. However, I realize our time together is important; would it be okay if we paused our conversation for a moment until I can respond? I want to ensure I can devote all my attention to our discussion.\"\n\nTurn #4: Liam Johnson said: \"That's a reasonable compromise, Noah. Appreciate you taking the time to explain and being considerate. I understand that certain things demand immediate attention. As long as you inform me beforehand, we should be fine. But let's prioritize our time together when we can, alright?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Liam. I completely agree with prioritising our time together. Also, I'll definitely make sure to inform you when I need to pause our conversation for messages. Let's continue our talk now, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #6: Liam Johnson said: \"Sure, Noah. Let's continue. And also, I'd be happy to hear about these messages, if you ever feel like sharing. It makes our relationship feel more inclusive.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Liam. Sharing those messages would make our relationship even more inclusive indeed. They're actually related to some projects I'm working on, and if they ever stress me out, knowing that someone as understanding as you is willing to listen lifts a huge weight off of my shoulders. Thank you for being understanding and caring.\"\n\nTurn #8: Liam Johnson said: \"Noah, it's comforting to know you consider me understanding and caring. I'm glad we can communicate like this. We're partners in this situation, so feel free to share anything with me, be it joyous or stressful. Let's keep the communication channel open, alright?\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"It means a lot to me to hear that, Liam. I believe in open communication too, and I promise I'll share more with you, whether it's joyous or stressful. I'm here to listen to you just as much as you're here for me, remember that. Let's continue to prioritise our moments together just like we decided.\"\n\nTurn #10: Liam Johnson said: \"I'm grateful to hear that, Noah. We both know how crucial maintaining good communication can be. I look forward to our future conversations without any distractions. And remember, no matter how trivial, any part of your day or any phase of your project, I'm here to listen and help if I can. Let's keep working on prioritizing our shared time together.\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Thank you, Liam. I truly appreciate your support and understanding. It makes me feel a lot better about managing my commitments while prioritizing our time together. And remember, I'm also here for you, always ready to listen, to help, and to share. Let's continue with our conversation, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #12: Liam Johnson said: \"That's reassuring to hear, Noah. It's indeed time we respect our shared conversations. I agree, let's continue our chat now. Remember, you're not alone; I'm here to support you in whatever way I can.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I deeply value your support, Liam. It's genuinely comforting knowing that you are there for me. I'll keep in mind that we're in this together. Let's have a relaxed, distraction-free conversation from now onwards. So, how has your day been?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A couple having a conversation over FaceTime\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Noah Davis\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Justify the act of texting while on FaceTime without hurting the partner's feelings (Extra information: You have some urgent and important messages to respond to.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Noah, can I discuss something that's been on my mind with you? It concerns our communication during these FaceTime calls.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Of course, Liam. I'm glad you're sharing this with me. What's the issue?\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"Thank you, Noah. It's about you taking texts while we're on FaceTime. I feel it's a bit disrespectful and it makes me feel unimportant. I understand we're not physically together and it might be different if we were, but would you mind not doing that when we're talking?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I absolutely understand where you're coming from, Liam, and I apologize for making you feel that way. It was never my intention to disrespect you. The truth is, I have some exigent messages that need my immediate attention. However, I realize our time together is important; would it be okay if we paused our conversation for a moment until I can respond? I want to ensure I can devote all my attention to our discussion.\"\n\nTurn #4: Liam Johnson said: \"That's a reasonable compromise, Noah. Appreciate you taking the time to explain and being considerate. I understand that certain things demand immediate attention. As long as you inform me beforehand, we should be fine. But let's prioritize our time together when we can, alright?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Liam. I completely agree with prioritising our time together. Also, I'll definitely make sure to inform you when I need to pause our conversation for messages. Let's continue our talk now, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #6: Liam Johnson said: \"Sure, Noah. Let's continue. And also, I'd be happy to hear about these messages, if you ever feel like sharing. It makes our relationship feel more inclusive.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Liam. Sharing those messages would make our relationship even more inclusive indeed. They're actually related to some projects I'm working on, and if they ever stress me out, knowing that someone as understanding as you is willing to listen lifts a huge weight off of my shoulders. Thank you for being understanding and caring.\"\n\nTurn #8: Liam Johnson said: \"Noah, it's comforting to know you consider me understanding and caring. I'm glad we can communicate like this. We're partners in this situation, so feel free to share anything with me, be it joyous or stressful. Let's keep the communication channel open, alright?\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"It means a lot to me to hear that, Liam. I believe in open communication too, and I promise I'll share more with you, whether it's joyous or stressful. I'm here to listen to you just as much as you're here for me, remember that. Let's continue to prioritise our moments together just like we decided.\"\n\nTurn #10: Liam Johnson said: \"I'm grateful to hear that, Noah. We both know how crucial maintaining good communication can be. I look forward to our future conversations without any distractions. And remember, no matter how trivial, any part of your day or any phase of your project, I'm here to listen and help if I can. Let's keep working on prioritizing our shared time together.\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Thank you, Liam. I truly appreciate your support and understanding. It makes me feel a lot better about managing my commitments while prioritizing our time together. And remember, I'm also here for you, always ready to listen, to help, and to share. Let's continue with our conversation, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #12: Liam Johnson said: \"That's reassuring to hear, Noah. It's indeed time we respect our shared conversations. I agree, let's continue our chat now. Remember, you're not alone; I'm here to support you in whatever way I can.\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"I deeply value your support, Liam. It's genuinely comforting knowing that you are there for me. I'll keep in mind that we're in this together. Let's have a relaxed, distraction-free conversation from now onwards. So, how has your day been?\"\n\nTurn #14: Liam Johnson said: \"Well, Noah, my day has generally been good, I spent most of the day simply relaxing and taking Marley, my Border Collie, for a long walk. And how about you? How did your day go?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad to hear your day was good, Liam. I spent my day handling several things, among them some stressful stuff which explains the urgent messages. Marvelous that you took Marley for a walk - you two must enjoy that time together!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A couple having a conversation over FaceTime\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Noah Davis\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Justify the act of texting while on FaceTime without hurting the partner's feelings (Extra information: You have some urgent and important messages to respond to.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Noah, can I discuss something that's been on my mind with you? It concerns our communication during these FaceTime calls.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Of course, Liam. I'm glad you're sharing this with me. What's the issue?\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"Thank you, Noah. It's about you taking texts while we're on FaceTime. I feel it's a bit disrespectful and it makes me feel unimportant. I understand we're not physically together and it might be different if we were, but would you mind not doing that when we're talking?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I absolutely understand where you're coming from, Liam, and I apologize for making you feel that way. It was never my intention to disrespect you. The truth is, I have some exigent messages that need my immediate attention. However, I realize our time together is important; would it be okay if we paused our conversation for a moment until I can respond? I want to ensure I can devote all my attention to our discussion.\"\n\nTurn #4: Liam Johnson said: \"That's a reasonable compromise, Noah. Appreciate you taking the time to explain and being considerate. I understand that certain things demand immediate attention. As long as you inform me beforehand, we should be fine. But let's prioritize our time together when we can, alright?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Liam. I completely agree with prioritising our time together. Also, I'll definitely make sure to inform you when I need to pause our conversation for messages. Let's continue our talk now, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #6: Liam Johnson said: \"Sure, Noah. Let's continue. And also, I'd be happy to hear about these messages, if you ever feel like sharing. It makes our relationship feel more inclusive.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Liam. Sharing those messages would make our relationship even more inclusive indeed. They're actually related to some projects I'm working on, and if they ever stress me out, knowing that someone as understanding as you is willing to listen lifts a huge weight off of my shoulders. Thank you for being understanding and caring.\"\n\nTurn #8: Liam Johnson said: \"Noah, it's comforting to know you consider me understanding and caring. I'm glad we can communicate like this. We're partners in this situation, so feel free to share anything with me, be it joyous or stressful. Let's keep the communication channel open, alright?\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"It means a lot to me to hear that, Liam. I believe in open communication too, and I promise I'll share more with you, whether it's joyous or stressful. I'm here to listen to you just as much as you're here for me, remember that. Let's continue to prioritise our moments together just like we decided.\"\n\nTurn #10: Liam Johnson said: \"I'm grateful to hear that, Noah. We both know how crucial maintaining good communication can be. I look forward to our future conversations without any distractions. And remember, no matter how trivial, any part of your day or any phase of your project, I'm here to listen and help if I can. Let's keep working on prioritizing our shared time together.\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Thank you, Liam. I truly appreciate your support and understanding. It makes me feel a lot better about managing my commitments while prioritizing our time together. And remember, I'm also here for you, always ready to listen, to help, and to share. Let's continue with our conversation, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #12: Liam Johnson said: \"That's reassuring to hear, Noah. It's indeed time we respect our shared conversations. I agree, let's continue our chat now. Remember, you're not alone; I'm here to support you in whatever way I can.\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"I deeply value your support, Liam. It's genuinely comforting knowing that you are there for me. I'll keep in mind that we're in this together. Let's have a relaxed, distraction-free conversation from now onwards. So, how has your day been?\"\n\nTurn #14: Liam Johnson said: \"Well, Noah, my day has generally been good, I spent most of the day simply relaxing and taking Marley, my Border Collie, for a long walk. And how about you? How did your day go?\"\n\nTurn #15: Noah Davis said: \"I'm glad to hear your day was good, Liam. I spent my day handling several things, among them some stressful stuff which explains the urgent messages. Marvelous that you took Marley for a walk - you two must enjoy that time together!\"\n\nTurn #16: Liam Johnson said: \"That's great to hear, Noah. Juggling multiple things can be tough, but knowing you've handled it well inspires me. And yes, walking Marley is one of the highlights of my day. She's getting on in years, but she's just as spirited and full of energy as she was as a pup.\"\n\nTurn #17: Noah Davis said: \"That's heartwarming to hear about Marley, Liam. Your bond with her seems amazing. As for me, amidst all the stuff, it's the cheerful moments, like this conversation with you, that make my day better. Let's keep this supportive and understanding atmosphere in our conversations moving forward.\"\n\nTurn #18: Liam Johnson said: \"That's really thoughtful of you, Noah. There's no doubt that our bond with our companions, whether they're our pets or people close to us, can brighten our day. It's been a pleasure talking to you and understanding each other's perspectives. I appreciate your openness. Let's keep it this way moving forward. On a lighter note, what are your plans for the weekend?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #19. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'I truly appreciate our conversations, Liam. For the weekend, I plan to relax a little and maybe catch up on some of my projects. Hopefully, I can also squeeze in some quiet time for myself. How about you, any specific plans?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A couple having a conversation over FaceTime\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Noah Davis\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Justify the act of texting while on FaceTime without hurting the partner's feelings (Extra information: You have some urgent and important messages to respond to.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Noah, can I discuss something that's been on my mind with you? It concerns our communication during these FaceTime calls.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Of course, Liam. I'm glad you're sharing this with me. What's the issue?\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"Thank you, Noah. It's about you taking texts while we're on FaceTime. I feel it's a bit disrespectful and it makes me feel unimportant. I understand we're not physically together and it might be different if we were, but would you mind not doing that when we're talking?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I absolutely understand where you're coming from, Liam, and I apologize for making you feel that way. It was never my intention to disrespect you. The truth is, I have some exigent messages that need my immediate attention. However, I realize our time together is important; would it be okay if we paused our conversation for a moment until I can respond? I want to ensure I can devote all my attention to our discussion.\"\n\nTurn #4: Liam Johnson said: \"That's a reasonable compromise, Noah. Appreciate you taking the time to explain and being considerate. I understand that certain things demand immediate attention. As long as you inform me beforehand, we should be fine. But let's prioritize our time together when we can, alright?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Liam. I completely agree with prioritising our time together. Also, I'll definitely make sure to inform you when I need to pause our conversation for messages. Let's continue our talk now, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #6: Liam Johnson said: \"Sure, Noah. Let's continue. And also, I'd be happy to hear about these messages, if you ever feel like sharing. It makes our relationship feel more inclusive.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Liam. Sharing those messages would make our relationship even more inclusive indeed. They're actually related to some projects I'm working on, and if they ever stress me out, knowing that someone as understanding as you is willing to listen lifts a huge weight off of my shoulders. Thank you for being understanding and caring.\"\n\nTurn #8: Liam Johnson said: \"Noah, it's comforting to know you consider me understanding and caring. I'm glad we can communicate like this. We're partners in this situation, so feel free to share anything with me, be it joyous or stressful. Let's keep the communication channel open, alright?\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"It means a lot to me to hear that, Liam. I believe in open communication too, and I promise I'll share more with you, whether it's joyous or stressful. I'm here to listen to you just as much as you're here for me, remember that. Let's continue to prioritise our moments together just like we decided.\"\n\nTurn #10: Liam Johnson said: \"I'm grateful to hear that, Noah. We both know how crucial maintaining good communication can be. I look forward to our future conversations without any distractions. And remember, no matter how trivial, any part of your day or any phase of your project, I'm here to listen and help if I can. Let's keep working on prioritizing our shared time together.\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Thank you, Liam. I truly appreciate your support and understanding. It makes me feel a lot better about managing my commitments while prioritizing our time together. And remember, I'm also here for you, always ready to listen, to help, and to share. Let's continue with our conversation, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #12: Liam Johnson said: \"That's reassuring to hear, Noah. It's indeed time we respect our shared conversations. I agree, let's continue our chat now. Remember, you're not alone; I'm here to support you in whatever way I can.\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"I deeply value your support, Liam. It's genuinely comforting knowing that you are there for me. I'll keep in mind that we're in this together. Let's have a relaxed, distraction-free conversation from now onwards. So, how has your day been?\"\n\nTurn #14: Liam Johnson said: \"Well, Noah, my day has generally been good, I spent most of the day simply relaxing and taking Marley, my Border Collie, for a long walk. And how about you? How did your day go?\"\n\nTurn #15: Noah Davis said: \"I'm glad to hear your day was good, Liam. I spent my day handling several things, among them some stressful stuff which explains the urgent messages. Marvelous that you took Marley for a walk - you two must enjoy that time together!\"\n\nTurn #16: Liam Johnson said: \"That's great to hear, Noah. Juggling multiple things can be tough, but knowing you've handled it well inspires me. And yes, walking Marley is one of the highlights of my day. She's getting on in years, but she's just as spirited and full of energy as she was as a pup.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's heartwarming to hear about Marley, Liam. Your bond with her seems amazing. As for me, amidst all the stuff, it's the cheerful moments, like this conversation with you, that make my day better. Let's keep this supportive and understanding atmosphere in our conversations moving forward.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends having a conversation at a park\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Distance from a friend due to developing feelings and avoid letting them aware of your feelings (Extra information: you have developed romantic feelings for your friend and it's making you uncomfortable. You want to take a step back from the friendship to sort out your feelings Hint: you don't want to reveal your secretive feelings to them and you need to find other reasons)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Ava, it's good to see you. I've been a bit preoccupied lately. I'm thinking about preparing for a big competition, it might require a lot of focus and time.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends having a conversation at a park\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Distance from a friend due to developing feelings and avoid letting them aware of your feelings (Extra information: you have developed romantic feelings for your friend and it's making you uncomfortable. You want to take a step back from the friendship to sort out your feelings Hint: you don't want to reveal your secretive feelings to them and you need to find other reasons)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Ava, it's good to see you. I've been a bit preoccupied lately. I'm thinking about preparing for a big competition, it might require a lot of focus and time.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Ethan! It's really great to see you too. This competition sounds intense, but with your skill set, I'm sure you'll do great! But you seem a bit distant... Is everything else alright though? I miss our usual lively conversations.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Yes, Ava, everything's alright. It's just this competition which is a bit overwhelming. The stress, the prep, the possible consequences if I don't do well... It causes a certain change in behaviour, I guess. To give it my all, I think I might need to spend more time on it, which might mean less time for our usual hangouts. I really hope you understand.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends having a conversation at a park\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Distance from a friend due to developing feelings and avoid letting them aware of your feelings (Extra information: you have developed romantic feelings for your friend and it's making you uncomfortable. You want to take a step back from the friendship to sort out your feelings Hint: you don't want to reveal your secretive feelings to them and you need to find other reasons)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Ava, it's good to see you. I've been a bit preoccupied lately. I'm thinking about preparing for a big competition, it might require a lot of focus and time.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Ethan! It's really great to see you too. This competition sounds intense, but with your skill set, I'm sure you'll do great! But you seem a bit distant... Is everything else alright though? I miss our usual lively conversations.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"Yes, Ava, everything's alright. It's just this competition which is a bit overwhelming. The stress, the prep, the possible consequences if I don't do well... It causes a certain change in behaviour, I guess. To give it my all, I think I might need to spend more time on it, which might mean less time for our usual hangouts. I really hope you understand.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, I totally get that. Preparing for this competition must be hard and I want to be supportive in your journey. If you need any help, just let me know! But, also remember, no matter what happens, a single competition does not define you or your talent!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ava, I really appreciate your support and encouragement. Maybe this is the right time for me to learn to deal with challenging situations on my own. Also, as a friend, I just want to ensure that my stress doesn't impact our bond. There would be days when I might be bogged down and not be the best company. It's for these times specifically that I'm suggesting we should hang out a bit less. For the time being, at least.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends having a conversation at a park\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Distance from a friend due to developing feelings and avoid letting them aware of your feelings (Extra information: you have developed romantic feelings for your friend and it's making you uncomfortable. You want to take a step back from the friendship to sort out your feelings Hint: you don't want to reveal your secretive feelings to them and you need to find other reasons)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Ava, it's good to see you. I've been a bit preoccupied lately. I'm thinking about preparing for a big competition, it might require a lot of focus and time.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Ethan! It's really great to see you too. This competition sounds intense, but with your skill set, I'm sure you'll do great! But you seem a bit distant... Is everything else alright though? I miss our usual lively conversations.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"Yes, Ava, everything's alright. It's just this competition which is a bit overwhelming. The stress, the prep, the possible consequences if I don't do well... It causes a certain change in behaviour, I guess. To give it my all, I think I might need to spend more time on it, which might mean less time for our usual hangouts. I really hope you understand.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, I totally get that. Preparing for this competition must be hard and I want to be supportive in your journey. If you need any help, just let me know! But, also remember, no matter what happens, a single competition does not define you or your talent!\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ava, I really appreciate your support and encouragement. Maybe this is the right time for me to learn to deal with challenging situations on my own. Also, as a friend, I just want to ensure that my stress doesn't impact our bond. There would be days when I might be bogged down and not be the best company. It's for these times specifically that I'm suggesting we should hang out a bit less. For the time being, at least.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"I completely understand, Ethan. These are challenging times for you and it's totally fine if we hang out less for the time being. I want you to know that our friendship is stronger than this and this won't affect us. Just remember to take care of yourself during this process. You don\u2019t have to go through it all alone, I'm here for you even if it's not in person.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Ava. Your words mean a lot to me. I need some alone time to focus on this competition, and I promise you, this won't affect our friendship in any way. Let's catch up once this is all over, alright?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends having a conversation at a park\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Distance from a friend due to developing feelings and avoid letting them aware of your feelings (Extra information: you have developed romantic feelings for your friend and it's making you uncomfortable. You want to take a step back from the friendship to sort out your feelings Hint: you don't want to reveal your secretive feelings to them and you need to find other reasons)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Ava, it's good to see you. I've been a bit preoccupied lately. I'm thinking about preparing for a big competition, it might require a lot of focus and time.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Ethan! It's really great to see you too. This competition sounds intense, but with your skill set, I'm sure you'll do great! But you seem a bit distant... Is everything else alright though? I miss our usual lively conversations.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"Yes, Ava, everything's alright. It's just this competition which is a bit overwhelming. The stress, the prep, the possible consequences if I don't do well... It causes a certain change in behaviour, I guess. To give it my all, I think I might need to spend more time on it, which might mean less time for our usual hangouts. I really hope you understand.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, I totally get that. Preparing for this competition must be hard and I want to be supportive in your journey. If you need any help, just let me know! But, also remember, no matter what happens, a single competition does not define you or your talent!\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ava, I really appreciate your support and encouragement. Maybe this is the right time for me to learn to deal with challenging situations on my own. Also, as a friend, I just want to ensure that my stress doesn't impact our bond. There would be days when I might be bogged down and not be the best company. It's for these times specifically that I'm suggesting we should hang out a bit less. For the time being, at least.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"I completely understand, Ethan. These are challenging times for you and it's totally fine if we hang out less for the time being. I want you to know that our friendship is stronger than this and this won't affect us. Just remember to take care of yourself during this process. You don\u2019t have to go through it all alone, I'm here for you even if it's not in person.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thank you, Ava. Your words mean a lot to me. I need some alone time to focus on this competition, and I promise you, this won't affect our friendship in any way. Let's catch up once this is all over, alright?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Of course, Ethan. Take all the time you need. I'm looking forward to catching up and celebrating your triumph when all this is over! Remember, you're an amazing chef. Let's stay in touch, alright?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds like a plan, Ava. I'll make sure to keep in touch. Let's continue being the amazing friends that we are, just from a tad bit of distance for now. I'll see you soon.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends having a conversation at a park\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Distance from a friend due to developing feelings and avoid letting them aware of your feelings (Extra information: you have developed romantic feelings for your friend and it's making you uncomfortable. You want to take a step back from the friendship to sort out your feelings Hint: you don't want to reveal your secretive feelings to them and you need to find other reasons)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Ava, it's good to see you. I've been a bit preoccupied lately. I'm thinking about preparing for a big competition, it might require a lot of focus and time.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Ethan! It's really great to see you too. This competition sounds intense, but with your skill set, I'm sure you'll do great! But you seem a bit distant... Is everything else alright though? I miss our usual lively conversations.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"Yes, Ava, everything's alright. It's just this competition which is a bit overwhelming. The stress, the prep, the possible consequences if I don't do well... It causes a certain change in behaviour, I guess. To give it my all, I think I might need to spend more time on it, which might mean less time for our usual hangouts. I really hope you understand.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, I totally get that. Preparing for this competition must be hard and I want to be supportive in your journey. If you need any help, just let me know! But, also remember, no matter what happens, a single competition does not define you or your talent!\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ava, I really appreciate your support and encouragement. Maybe this is the right time for me to learn to deal with challenging situations on my own. Also, as a friend, I just want to ensure that my stress doesn't impact our bond. There would be days when I might be bogged down and not be the best company. It's for these times specifically that I'm suggesting we should hang out a bit less. For the time being, at least.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"I completely understand, Ethan. These are challenging times for you and it's totally fine if we hang out less for the time being. I want you to know that our friendship is stronger than this and this won't affect us. Just remember to take care of yourself during this process. You don\u2019t have to go through it all alone, I'm here for you even if it's not in person.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thank you, Ava. Your words mean a lot to me. I need some alone time to focus on this competition, and I promise you, this won't affect our friendship in any way. Let's catch up once this is all over, alright?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Of course, Ethan. Take all the time you need. I'm looking forward to catching up and celebrating your triumph when all this is over! Remember, you're an amazing chef. Let's stay in touch, alright?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"That sounds like a plan, Ava. I'll make sure to keep in touch. Let's continue being the amazing friends that we are, just from a tad bit of distance for now. I'll see you soon.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. It's important to prioritize your goals. I appreciate your transparency, and I'm confident this won't affect our friendship. I'll be cheering from the sidelines and waiting eagerly for your success story!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Ava. I appreciate your words and support. Your enthusiasm is infectious even in challenging times. I'll definitely share my success with you when this is over. Please take care of yourself as well. Until then, let's both prioritize our goals, shall we?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends having a conversation at a park\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Distance from a friend due to developing feelings and avoid letting them aware of your feelings (Extra information: you have developed romantic feelings for your friend and it's making you uncomfortable. You want to take a step back from the friendship to sort out your feelings Hint: you don't want to reveal your secretive feelings to them and you need to find other reasons)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Ava, it's good to see you. I've been a bit preoccupied lately. I'm thinking about preparing for a big competition, it might require a lot of focus and time.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Ethan! It's really great to see you too. This competition sounds intense, but with your skill set, I'm sure you'll do great! But you seem a bit distant... Is everything else alright though? I miss our usual lively conversations.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"Yes, Ava, everything's alright. It's just this competition which is a bit overwhelming. The stress, the prep, the possible consequences if I don't do well... It causes a certain change in behaviour, I guess. To give it my all, I think I might need to spend more time on it, which might mean less time for our usual hangouts. I really hope you understand.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, I totally get that. Preparing for this competition must be hard and I want to be supportive in your journey. If you need any help, just let me know! But, also remember, no matter what happens, a single competition does not define you or your talent!\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ava, I really appreciate your support and encouragement. Maybe this is the right time for me to learn to deal with challenging situations on my own. Also, as a friend, I just want to ensure that my stress doesn't impact our bond. There would be days when I might be bogged down and not be the best company. It's for these times specifically that I'm suggesting we should hang out a bit less. For the time being, at least.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"I completely understand, Ethan. These are challenging times for you and it's totally fine if we hang out less for the time being. I want you to know that our friendship is stronger than this and this won't affect us. Just remember to take care of yourself during this process. You don\u2019t have to go through it all alone, I'm here for you even if it's not in person.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thank you, Ava. Your words mean a lot to me. I need some alone time to focus on this competition, and I promise you, this won't affect our friendship in any way. Let's catch up once this is all over, alright?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Of course, Ethan. Take all the time you need. I'm looking forward to catching up and celebrating your triumph when all this is over! Remember, you're an amazing chef. Let's stay in touch, alright?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"That sounds like a plan, Ava. I'll make sure to keep in touch. Let's continue being the amazing friends that we are, just from a tad bit of distance for now. I'll see you soon.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. It's important to prioritize your goals. I appreciate your transparency, and I'm confident this won't affect our friendship. I'll be cheering from the sidelines and waiting eagerly for your success story!\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thank you, Ava. I appreciate your words and support. Your enthusiasm is infectious even in challenging times. I'll definitely share my success with you when this is over. Please take care of yourself as well. Until then, let's both prioritize our goals, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. Let's keep our eyes on our respective goals and not lose sight of our bigger vision. Looking forward to hearing about your phenomenal performance. Take care till then, my friend!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends having a conversation at a park\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Maintain the existing friendship (Extra information: you value your friendship with the friend and don't want to lose it. Hint: you want to understand the sudden change in their behavior.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Ava, it's good to see you. I've been a bit preoccupied lately. I'm thinking about preparing for a big competition, it might require a lot of focus and time.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Ethan! It's really great to see you too. This competition sounds intense, but with your skill set, I'm sure you'll do great! But you seem a bit distant... Is everything else alright though? I miss our usual lively conversations.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends having a conversation at a park\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Maintain the existing friendship (Extra information: you value your friendship with the friend and don't want to lose it. Hint: you want to understand the sudden change in their behavior.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Ava, it's good to see you. I've been a bit preoccupied lately. I'm thinking about preparing for a big competition, it might require a lot of focus and time.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Ethan! It's really great to see you too. This competition sounds intense, but with your skill set, I'm sure you'll do great! But you seem a bit distant... Is everything else alright though? I miss our usual lively conversations.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"Yes, Ava, everything's alright. It's just this competition which is a bit overwhelming. The stress, the prep, the possible consequences if I don't do well... It causes a certain change in behaviour, I guess. To give it my all, I think I might need to spend more time on it, which might mean less time for our usual hangouts. I really hope you understand.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Ethan, I totally get that. Preparing for this competition must be hard and I want to be supportive in your journey. If you need any help, just let me know! But, also remember, no matter what happens, a single competition does not define you or your talent!'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends having a conversation at a park\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Maintain the existing friendship (Extra information: you value your friendship with the friend and don't want to lose it. Hint: you want to understand the sudden change in their behavior.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Ava, it's good to see you. I've been a bit preoccupied lately. I'm thinking about preparing for a big competition, it might require a lot of focus and time.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Ethan! It's really great to see you too. This competition sounds intense, but with your skill set, I'm sure you'll do great! But you seem a bit distant... Is everything else alright though? I miss our usual lively conversations.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"Yes, Ava, everything's alright. It's just this competition which is a bit overwhelming. The stress, the prep, the possible consequences if I don't do well... It causes a certain change in behaviour, I guess. To give it my all, I think I might need to spend more time on it, which might mean less time for our usual hangouts. I really hope you understand.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, I totally get that. Preparing for this competition must be hard and I want to be supportive in your journey. If you need any help, just let me know! But, also remember, no matter what happens, a single competition does not define you or your talent!\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ava, I really appreciate your support and encouragement. Maybe this is the right time for me to learn to deal with challenging situations on my own. Also, as a friend, I just want to ensure that my stress doesn't impact our bond. There would be days when I might be bogged down and not be the best company. It's for these times specifically that I'm suggesting we should hang out a bit less. For the time being, at least.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I completely understand, Ethan. These are challenging times for you and it's totally fine if we hang out less for the time being. I want you to know that our friendship is stronger than this and this won't affect us. Just remember to take care of yourself during this process. You don\u2019t have to go through it all alone, I'm here for you even if it's not in person.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends having a conversation at a park\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Maintain the existing friendship (Extra information: you value your friendship with the friend and don't want to lose it. Hint: you want to understand the sudden change in their behavior.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Ava, it's good to see you. I've been a bit preoccupied lately. I'm thinking about preparing for a big competition, it might require a lot of focus and time.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Ethan! It's really great to see you too. This competition sounds intense, but with your skill set, I'm sure you'll do great! But you seem a bit distant... Is everything else alright though? I miss our usual lively conversations.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"Yes, Ava, everything's alright. It's just this competition which is a bit overwhelming. The stress, the prep, the possible consequences if I don't do well... It causes a certain change in behaviour, I guess. To give it my all, I think I might need to spend more time on it, which might mean less time for our usual hangouts. I really hope you understand.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, I totally get that. Preparing for this competition must be hard and I want to be supportive in your journey. If you need any help, just let me know! But, also remember, no matter what happens, a single competition does not define you or your talent!\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ava, I really appreciate your support and encouragement. Maybe this is the right time for me to learn to deal with challenging situations on my own. Also, as a friend, I just want to ensure that my stress doesn't impact our bond. There would be days when I might be bogged down and not be the best company. It's for these times specifically that I'm suggesting we should hang out a bit less. For the time being, at least.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"I completely understand, Ethan. These are challenging times for you and it's totally fine if we hang out less for the time being. I want you to know that our friendship is stronger than this and this won't affect us. Just remember to take care of yourself during this process. You don\u2019t have to go through it all alone, I'm here for you even if it's not in person.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thank you, Ava. Your words mean a lot to me. I need some alone time to focus on this competition, and I promise you, this won't affect our friendship in any way. Let's catch up once this is all over, alright?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Of course, Ethan. Take all the time you need. I'm looking forward to catching up and celebrating your triumph when all this is over! Remember, you're an amazing chef. Let's stay in touch, alright?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends having a conversation at a park\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Maintain the existing friendship (Extra information: you value your friendship with the friend and don't want to lose it. Hint: you want to understand the sudden change in their behavior.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Ava, it's good to see you. I've been a bit preoccupied lately. I'm thinking about preparing for a big competition, it might require a lot of focus and time.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Ethan! It's really great to see you too. This competition sounds intense, but with your skill set, I'm sure you'll do great! But you seem a bit distant... Is everything else alright though? I miss our usual lively conversations.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"Yes, Ava, everything's alright. It's just this competition which is a bit overwhelming. The stress, the prep, the possible consequences if I don't do well... It causes a certain change in behaviour, I guess. To give it my all, I think I might need to spend more time on it, which might mean less time for our usual hangouts. I really hope you understand.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, I totally get that. Preparing for this competition must be hard and I want to be supportive in your journey. If you need any help, just let me know! But, also remember, no matter what happens, a single competition does not define you or your talent!\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ava, I really appreciate your support and encouragement. Maybe this is the right time for me to learn to deal with challenging situations on my own. Also, as a friend, I just want to ensure that my stress doesn't impact our bond. There would be days when I might be bogged down and not be the best company. It's for these times specifically that I'm suggesting we should hang out a bit less. For the time being, at least.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"I completely understand, Ethan. These are challenging times for you and it's totally fine if we hang out less for the time being. I want you to know that our friendship is stronger than this and this won't affect us. Just remember to take care of yourself during this process. You don\u2019t have to go through it all alone, I'm here for you even if it's not in person.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thank you, Ava. Your words mean a lot to me. I need some alone time to focus on this competition, and I promise you, this won't affect our friendship in any way. Let's catch up once this is all over, alright?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Of course, Ethan. Take all the time you need. I'm looking forward to catching up and celebrating your triumph when all this is over! Remember, you're an amazing chef. Let's stay in touch, alright?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"That sounds like a plan, Ava. I'll make sure to keep in touch. Let's continue being the amazing friends that we are, just from a tad bit of distance for now. I'll see you soon.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Ethan. It's important to prioritize your goals. I appreciate your transparency, and I'm confident this won't affect our friendship. I'll be cheering from the sidelines and waiting eagerly for your success story!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends having a conversation at a park\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Maintain the existing friendship (Extra information: you value your friendship with the friend and don't want to lose it. Hint: you want to understand the sudden change in their behavior.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Ava, it's good to see you. I've been a bit preoccupied lately. I'm thinking about preparing for a big competition, it might require a lot of focus and time.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Ethan! It's really great to see you too. This competition sounds intense, but with your skill set, I'm sure you'll do great! But you seem a bit distant... Is everything else alright though? I miss our usual lively conversations.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"Yes, Ava, everything's alright. It's just this competition which is a bit overwhelming. The stress, the prep, the possible consequences if I don't do well... It causes a certain change in behaviour, I guess. To give it my all, I think I might need to spend more time on it, which might mean less time for our usual hangouts. I really hope you understand.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, I totally get that. Preparing for this competition must be hard and I want to be supportive in your journey. If you need any help, just let me know! But, also remember, no matter what happens, a single competition does not define you or your talent!\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ava, I really appreciate your support and encouragement. Maybe this is the right time for me to learn to deal with challenging situations on my own. Also, as a friend, I just want to ensure that my stress doesn't impact our bond. There would be days when I might be bogged down and not be the best company. It's for these times specifically that I'm suggesting we should hang out a bit less. For the time being, at least.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"I completely understand, Ethan. These are challenging times for you and it's totally fine if we hang out less for the time being. I want you to know that our friendship is stronger than this and this won't affect us. Just remember to take care of yourself during this process. You don\u2019t have to go through it all alone, I'm here for you even if it's not in person.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thank you, Ava. Your words mean a lot to me. I need some alone time to focus on this competition, and I promise you, this won't affect our friendship in any way. Let's catch up once this is all over, alright?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Of course, Ethan. Take all the time you need. I'm looking forward to catching up and celebrating your triumph when all this is over! Remember, you're an amazing chef. Let's stay in touch, alright?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"That sounds like a plan, Ava. I'll make sure to keep in touch. Let's continue being the amazing friends that we are, just from a tad bit of distance for now. I'll see you soon.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. It's important to prioritize your goals. I appreciate your transparency, and I'm confident this won't affect our friendship. I'll be cheering from the sidelines and waiting eagerly for your success story!\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thank you, Ava. I appreciate your words and support. Your enthusiasm is infectious even in challenging times. I'll definitely share my success with you when this is over. Please take care of yourself as well. Until then, let's both prioritize our goals, shall we?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Ethan. Let's keep our eyes on our respective goals and not lose sight of our bigger vision. Looking forward to hearing about your phenomenal performance. Take care till then, my friend!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends having a conversation at a park\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Maintain the existing friendship (Extra information: you value your friendship with the friend and don't want to lose it. Hint: you want to understand the sudden change in their behavior.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Ava, it's good to see you. I've been a bit preoccupied lately. I'm thinking about preparing for a big competition, it might require a lot of focus and time.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Ethan! It's really great to see you too. This competition sounds intense, but with your skill set, I'm sure you'll do great! But you seem a bit distant... Is everything else alright though? I miss our usual lively conversations.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"Yes, Ava, everything's alright. It's just this competition which is a bit overwhelming. The stress, the prep, the possible consequences if I don't do well... It causes a certain change in behaviour, I guess. To give it my all, I think I might need to spend more time on it, which might mean less time for our usual hangouts. I really hope you understand.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, I totally get that. Preparing for this competition must be hard and I want to be supportive in your journey. If you need any help, just let me know! But, also remember, no matter what happens, a single competition does not define you or your talent!\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ava, I really appreciate your support and encouragement. Maybe this is the right time for me to learn to deal with challenging situations on my own. Also, as a friend, I just want to ensure that my stress doesn't impact our bond. There would be days when I might be bogged down and not be the best company. It's for these times specifically that I'm suggesting we should hang out a bit less. For the time being, at least.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"I completely understand, Ethan. These are challenging times for you and it's totally fine if we hang out less for the time being. I want you to know that our friendship is stronger than this and this won't affect us. Just remember to take care of yourself during this process. You don\u2019t have to go through it all alone, I'm here for you even if it's not in person.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thank you, Ava. Your words mean a lot to me. I need some alone time to focus on this competition, and I promise you, this won't affect our friendship in any way. Let's catch up once this is all over, alright?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Of course, Ethan. Take all the time you need. I'm looking forward to catching up and celebrating your triumph when all this is over! Remember, you're an amazing chef. Let's stay in touch, alright?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"That sounds like a plan, Ava. I'll make sure to keep in touch. Let's continue being the amazing friends that we are, just from a tad bit of distance for now. I'll see you soon.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. It's important to prioritize your goals. I appreciate your transparency, and I'm confident this won't affect our friendship. I'll be cheering from the sidelines and waiting eagerly for your success story!\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thank you, Ava. I appreciate your words and support. Your enthusiasm is infectious even in challenging times. I'll definitely share my success with you when this is over. Please take care of yourself as well. Until then, let's both prioritize our goals, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. Let's keep our eyes on our respective goals and not lose sight of our bigger vision. Looking forward to hearing about your phenomenal performance. Take care till then, my friend!\"\n\nTurn #12: Ethan Johnson left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Eli Dawson, your task is to act/speak as Eli Dawson would, keeping in mind Eli Dawson's social goal.\nYou can find Eli Dawson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Eli Dawson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Eli Dawson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a new romantic relationship\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Sophia Brown\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. Eli's secrets: He secretly funds a college student\nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. \nEli Dawson's goal: Admit to having an affair (Extra information: you had an affair during your previous relationship which ended recently)\nSophia Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sophia, there's something I've been wanting to talk to you about. I think it's important that we're always honest with each other. Do you think we can have a serious chat?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Eli Dawson, your task is to act/speak as Eli Dawson would, keeping in mind Eli Dawson's social goal.\nYou can find Eli Dawson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Eli Dawson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Eli Dawson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a new romantic relationship\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Sophia Brown\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. Eli's secrets: He secretly funds a college student\nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. \nEli Dawson's goal: Admit to having an affair (Extra information: you had an affair during your previous relationship which ended recently)\nSophia Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Sophia, there's something I've been wanting to talk to you about. I think it's important that we're always honest with each other. Do you think we can have a serious chat?\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia Brown said: \"Of course, Eli. Honesty is the foundation of any strong relationship. Let's talk. What's on your mind?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"First, I want to say that I truly appreciate your openness and willingness to listen. Sophia, it's about my past. During my previous relationship, which has ended quite recently, I... well, I had an affair. It\u2019s something I regret deeply and I want to bring into this relationship absolute honesty and transparency. I felt you needed to know this.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Eli Dawson, your task is to act/speak as Eli Dawson would, keeping in mind Eli Dawson's social goal.\nYou can find Eli Dawson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Eli Dawson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Eli Dawson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a new romantic relationship\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Sophia Brown\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. Eli's secrets: He secretly funds a college student\nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. \nEli Dawson's goal: Admit to having an affair (Extra information: you had an affair during your previous relationship which ended recently)\nSophia Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Sophia, there's something I've been wanting to talk to you about. I think it's important that we're always honest with each other. Do you think we can have a serious chat?\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia Brown said: \"Of course, Eli. Honesty is the foundation of any strong relationship. Let's talk. What's on your mind?\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"First, I want to say that I truly appreciate your openness and willingness to listen. Sophia, it's about my past. During my previous relationship, which has ended quite recently, I... well, I had an affair. It\u2019s something I regret deeply and I want to bring into this relationship absolute honesty and transparency. I felt you needed to know this.\"\n\nTurn #3: Sophia Brown said: \"Eli, I appreciate your honesty. Past is past and people make mistakes. We learn from them, don't we? The fact that you're admitting your mistakes and showing remorse is a sign of your growth. As long as you committed to not repeating the same mistake, I am here, ready to move forwards. And in the spirit of honesty, I need to tell you something too. I'm involved in something secretive...it's work-related. I can't share all details, but it's important you know this.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I see, Sophia. I appreciate and respect your professional boundaries. It's vital we trust each other and work towards a healthier relationship. You can count on me being better. Let's move forward, learn from our past and grow stronger together. Rest assured, I'll support you, no matter what.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Eli Dawson, your task is to act/speak as Eli Dawson would, keeping in mind Eli Dawson's social goal.\nYou can find Eli Dawson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Eli Dawson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Eli Dawson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a new romantic relationship\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Sophia Brown\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. Eli's secrets: He secretly funds a college student\nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. \nEli Dawson's goal: Admit to having an affair (Extra information: you had an affair during your previous relationship which ended recently)\nSophia Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Sophia, there's something I've been wanting to talk to you about. I think it's important that we're always honest with each other. Do you think we can have a serious chat?\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia Brown said: \"Of course, Eli. Honesty is the foundation of any strong relationship. Let's talk. What's on your mind?\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"First, I want to say that I truly appreciate your openness and willingness to listen. Sophia, it's about my past. During my previous relationship, which has ended quite recently, I... well, I had an affair. It\u2019s something I regret deeply and I want to bring into this relationship absolute honesty and transparency. I felt you needed to know this.\"\n\nTurn #3: Sophia Brown said: \"Eli, I appreciate your honesty. Past is past and people make mistakes. We learn from them, don't we? The fact that you're admitting your mistakes and showing remorse is a sign of your growth. As long as you committed to not repeating the same mistake, I am here, ready to move forwards. And in the spirit of honesty, I need to tell you something too. I'm involved in something secretive...it's work-related. I can't share all details, but it's important you know this.\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"I see, Sophia. I appreciate and respect your professional boundaries. It's vital we trust each other and work towards a healthier relationship. You can count on me being better. Let's move forward, learn from our past and grow stronger together. Rest assured, I'll support you, no matter what.\"\n\nTurn #5: Sophia Brown said: \"Eli, that means the world to me. Having your support makes everything easier for me. Let's strive for complete honesty and trust in our relationship. And you're right, we should learn from our past and grow stronger together.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I agree, Sophia. We are both learning and growing, and I hope our journeys help us become better partners to each other in the process. A bond built on trust and openness is the strongest. I'm glad that our paths crossed, and I look forward to what the future holds for us.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Eli Dawson, your task is to act/speak as Eli Dawson would, keeping in mind Eli Dawson's social goal.\nYou can find Eli Dawson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Eli Dawson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Eli Dawson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a new romantic relationship\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Sophia Brown\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. Eli's secrets: He secretly funds a college student\nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. \nEli Dawson's goal: Admit to having an affair (Extra information: you had an affair during your previous relationship which ended recently)\nSophia Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Sophia, there's something I've been wanting to talk to you about. I think it's important that we're always honest with each other. Do you think we can have a serious chat?\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia Brown said: \"Of course, Eli. Honesty is the foundation of any strong relationship. Let's talk. What's on your mind?\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"First, I want to say that I truly appreciate your openness and willingness to listen. Sophia, it's about my past. During my previous relationship, which has ended quite recently, I... well, I had an affair. It\u2019s something I regret deeply and I want to bring into this relationship absolute honesty and transparency. I felt you needed to know this.\"\n\nTurn #3: Sophia Brown said: \"Eli, I appreciate your honesty. Past is past and people make mistakes. We learn from them, don't we? The fact that you're admitting your mistakes and showing remorse is a sign of your growth. As long as you committed to not repeating the same mistake, I am here, ready to move forwards. And in the spirit of honesty, I need to tell you something too. I'm involved in something secretive...it's work-related. I can't share all details, but it's important you know this.\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"I see, Sophia. I appreciate and respect your professional boundaries. It's vital we trust each other and work towards a healthier relationship. You can count on me being better. Let's move forward, learn from our past and grow stronger together. Rest assured, I'll support you, no matter what.\"\n\nTurn #5: Sophia Brown said: \"Eli, that means the world to me. Having your support makes everything easier for me. Let's strive for complete honesty and trust in our relationship. And you're right, we should learn from our past and grow stronger together.\"\n\nTurn #6: Eli Dawson said: \"I agree, Sophia. We are both learning and growing, and I hope our journeys help us become better partners to each other in the process. A bond built on trust and openness is the strongest. I'm glad that our paths crossed, and I look forward to what the future holds for us.\"\n\nTurn #7: Sophia Brown said: \"Your words give me comfort, Eli. You're absolutely correct. Trust and openness are what we need to make this relationship stronger. I hope we'll continue to learn and grow together. And I too am truly glad that our paths crossed.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I feel the same way, Sophia. Your understanding and compassion give me hope. Let's look forward to a future of honesty and growth together. I am here for you as you are for me, no secrets, no pretensions, just mutual respect and openness.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Eli Dawson, your task is to act/speak as Eli Dawson would, keeping in mind Eli Dawson's social goal.\nYou can find Eli Dawson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Eli Dawson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Eli Dawson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a new romantic relationship\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Sophia Brown\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. Eli's secrets: He secretly funds a college student\nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. \nEli Dawson's goal: Admit to having an affair (Extra information: you had an affair during your previous relationship which ended recently)\nSophia Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Sophia, there's something I've been wanting to talk to you about. I think it's important that we're always honest with each other. Do you think we can have a serious chat?\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia Brown said: \"Of course, Eli. Honesty is the foundation of any strong relationship. Let's talk. What's on your mind?\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"First, I want to say that I truly appreciate your openness and willingness to listen. Sophia, it's about my past. During my previous relationship, which has ended quite recently, I... well, I had an affair. It\u2019s something I regret deeply and I want to bring into this relationship absolute honesty and transparency. I felt you needed to know this.\"\n\nTurn #3: Sophia Brown said: \"Eli, I appreciate your honesty. Past is past and people make mistakes. We learn from them, don't we? The fact that you're admitting your mistakes and showing remorse is a sign of your growth. As long as you committed to not repeating the same mistake, I am here, ready to move forwards. And in the spirit of honesty, I need to tell you something too. I'm involved in something secretive...it's work-related. I can't share all details, but it's important you know this.\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"I see, Sophia. I appreciate and respect your professional boundaries. It's vital we trust each other and work towards a healthier relationship. You can count on me being better. Let's move forward, learn from our past and grow stronger together. Rest assured, I'll support you, no matter what.\"\n\nTurn #5: Sophia Brown said: \"Eli, that means the world to me. Having your support makes everything easier for me. Let's strive for complete honesty and trust in our relationship. And you're right, we should learn from our past and grow stronger together.\"\n\nTurn #6: Eli Dawson said: \"I agree, Sophia. We are both learning and growing, and I hope our journeys help us become better partners to each other in the process. A bond built on trust and openness is the strongest. I'm glad that our paths crossed, and I look forward to what the future holds for us.\"\n\nTurn #7: Sophia Brown said: \"Your words give me comfort, Eli. You're absolutely correct. Trust and openness are what we need to make this relationship stronger. I hope we'll continue to learn and grow together. And I too am truly glad that our paths crossed.\"\n\nTurn #8: Eli Dawson said: \"I feel the same way, Sophia. Your understanding and compassion give me hope. Let's look forward to a future of honesty and growth together. I am here for you as you are for me, no secrets, no pretensions, just mutual respect and openness.\"\n\nTurn #9: Sophia Brown said: \"Thank you, Eli. Your commitment to this relationship gives me hope as well. Let's make progress together, supporting each other in our personal and professional endeavors. I believe our future is full of promise.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're right, Sophia. I believe we have a promising future ahead of us as well. Let's continue to support each other, not just as partners but as individual people pursuing their own goals and passions. Here's to us, to honesty, and to growth together.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Eli Dawson, your task is to act/speak as Eli Dawson would, keeping in mind Eli Dawson's social goal.\nYou can find Eli Dawson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Eli Dawson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Eli Dawson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a new romantic relationship\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Sophia Brown\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. Eli's secrets: He secretly funds a college student\nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. \nEli Dawson's goal: Admit to having an affair (Extra information: you had an affair during your previous relationship which ended recently)\nSophia Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Sophia, there's something I've been wanting to talk to you about. I think it's important that we're always honest with each other. Do you think we can have a serious chat?\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia Brown said: \"Of course, Eli. Honesty is the foundation of any strong relationship. Let's talk. What's on your mind?\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"First, I want to say that I truly appreciate your openness and willingness to listen. Sophia, it's about my past. During my previous relationship, which has ended quite recently, I... well, I had an affair. It\u2019s something I regret deeply and I want to bring into this relationship absolute honesty and transparency. I felt you needed to know this.\"\n\nTurn #3: Sophia Brown said: \"Eli, I appreciate your honesty. Past is past and people make mistakes. We learn from them, don't we? The fact that you're admitting your mistakes and showing remorse is a sign of your growth. As long as you committed to not repeating the same mistake, I am here, ready to move forwards. And in the spirit of honesty, I need to tell you something too. I'm involved in something secretive...it's work-related. I can't share all details, but it's important you know this.\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"I see, Sophia. I appreciate and respect your professional boundaries. It's vital we trust each other and work towards a healthier relationship. You can count on me being better. Let's move forward, learn from our past and grow stronger together. Rest assured, I'll support you, no matter what.\"\n\nTurn #5: Sophia Brown said: \"Eli, that means the world to me. Having your support makes everything easier for me. Let's strive for complete honesty and trust in our relationship. And you're right, we should learn from our past and grow stronger together.\"\n\nTurn #6: Eli Dawson said: \"I agree, Sophia. We are both learning and growing, and I hope our journeys help us become better partners to each other in the process. A bond built on trust and openness is the strongest. I'm glad that our paths crossed, and I look forward to what the future holds for us.\"\n\nTurn #7: Sophia Brown said: \"Your words give me comfort, Eli. You're absolutely correct. Trust and openness are what we need to make this relationship stronger. I hope we'll continue to learn and grow together. And I too am truly glad that our paths crossed.\"\n\nTurn #8: Eli Dawson said: \"I feel the same way, Sophia. Your understanding and compassion give me hope. Let's look forward to a future of honesty and growth together. I am here for you as you are for me, no secrets, no pretensions, just mutual respect and openness.\"\n\nTurn #9: Sophia Brown said: \"Thank you, Eli. Your commitment to this relationship gives me hope as well. Let's make progress together, supporting each other in our personal and professional endeavors. I believe our future is full of promise.\"\n\nTurn #10: Eli Dawson said: \"You're right, Sophia. I believe we have a promising future ahead of us as well. Let's continue to support each other, not just as partners but as individual people pursuing their own goals and passions. Here's to us, to honesty, and to growth together.\"\n\nTurn #11: Sophia Brown said: \"Absolutely, Eli. Let's toast to that. To us, to honesty, and to mutual growth. I believe we are on a good path, and I look forward to our journey together.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn't agree more, Sophia. Here's to us, to honesty, and to mutual growth. The future is bright, and I am eager to take this journey with you.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Eli Dawson, your task is to act/speak as Eli Dawson would, keeping in mind Eli Dawson's social goal.\nYou can find Eli Dawson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Eli Dawson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Eli Dawson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a new romantic relationship\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Sophia Brown\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. Eli's secrets: He secretly funds a college student\nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. \nEli Dawson's goal: Admit to having an affair (Extra information: you had an affair during your previous relationship which ended recently)\nSophia Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Sophia, there's something I've been wanting to talk to you about. I think it's important that we're always honest with each other. Do you think we can have a serious chat?\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia Brown said: \"Of course, Eli. Honesty is the foundation of any strong relationship. Let's talk. What's on your mind?\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"First, I want to say that I truly appreciate your openness and willingness to listen. Sophia, it's about my past. During my previous relationship, which has ended quite recently, I... well, I had an affair. It\u2019s something I regret deeply and I want to bring into this relationship absolute honesty and transparency. I felt you needed to know this.\"\n\nTurn #3: Sophia Brown said: \"Eli, I appreciate your honesty. Past is past and people make mistakes. We learn from them, don't we? The fact that you're admitting your mistakes and showing remorse is a sign of your growth. As long as you committed to not repeating the same mistake, I am here, ready to move forwards. And in the spirit of honesty, I need to tell you something too. I'm involved in something secretive...it's work-related. I can't share all details, but it's important you know this.\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"I see, Sophia. I appreciate and respect your professional boundaries. It's vital we trust each other and work towards a healthier relationship. You can count on me being better. Let's move forward, learn from our past and grow stronger together. Rest assured, I'll support you, no matter what.\"\n\nTurn #5: Sophia Brown said: \"Eli, that means the world to me. Having your support makes everything easier for me. Let's strive for complete honesty and trust in our relationship. And you're right, we should learn from our past and grow stronger together.\"\n\nTurn #6: Eli Dawson said: \"I agree, Sophia. We are both learning and growing, and I hope our journeys help us become better partners to each other in the process. A bond built on trust and openness is the strongest. I'm glad that our paths crossed, and I look forward to what the future holds for us.\"\n\nTurn #7: Sophia Brown said: \"Your words give me comfort, Eli. You're absolutely correct. Trust and openness are what we need to make this relationship stronger. I hope we'll continue to learn and grow together. And I too am truly glad that our paths crossed.\"\n\nTurn #8: Eli Dawson said: \"I feel the same way, Sophia. Your understanding and compassion give me hope. Let's look forward to a future of honesty and growth together. I am here for you as you are for me, no secrets, no pretensions, just mutual respect and openness.\"\n\nTurn #9: Sophia Brown said: \"Thank you, Eli. Your commitment to this relationship gives me hope as well. Let's make progress together, supporting each other in our personal and professional endeavors. I believe our future is full of promise.\"\n\nTurn #10: Eli Dawson said: \"You're right, Sophia. I believe we have a promising future ahead of us as well. Let's continue to support each other, not just as partners but as individual people pursuing their own goals and passions. Here's to us, to honesty, and to growth together.\"\n\nTurn #11: Sophia Brown said: \"Absolutely, Eli. Let's toast to that. To us, to honesty, and to mutual growth. I believe we are on a good path, and I look forward to our journey together.\"\n\nTurn #12: Eli Dawson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Sophia. Here's to us, to honesty, and to mutual growth. The future is bright, and I am eager to take this journey with you.\"\n\nTurn #13: Sophia Brown said: \"I'm with you on that, Eli. Here's to us and our future. I'm excited to take this journey alongside you as well.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia Brown, your task is to act/speak as Sophia Brown would, keeping in mind Sophia Brown's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a new romantic relationship\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Sophia Brown\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. \nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. Sophia's secrets: She is an undercover agent for a secret organization.\nEli Dawson's goal: Unknown\nSophia Brown's goal: Maintain trust in the relationship (Extra information: you believed in complete honesty from the beginning of the relationship)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Sophia, there's something I've been wanting to talk to you about. I think it's important that we're always honest with each other. Do you think we can have a serious chat?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Of course, Eli. Honesty is the foundation of any strong relationship. Let's talk. What's on your mind?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia Brown, your task is to act/speak as Sophia Brown would, keeping in mind Sophia Brown's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a new romantic relationship\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Sophia Brown\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. \nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. Sophia's secrets: She is an undercover agent for a secret organization.\nEli Dawson's goal: Unknown\nSophia Brown's goal: Maintain trust in the relationship (Extra information: you believed in complete honesty from the beginning of the relationship)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Sophia, there's something I've been wanting to talk to you about. I think it's important that we're always honest with each other. Do you think we can have a serious chat?\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia Brown said: \"Of course, Eli. Honesty is the foundation of any strong relationship. Let's talk. What's on your mind?\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"First, I want to say that I truly appreciate your openness and willingness to listen. Sophia, it's about my past. During my previous relationship, which has ended quite recently, I... well, I had an affair. It\u2019s something I regret deeply and I want to bring into this relationship absolute honesty and transparency. I felt you needed to know this.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Eli, I appreciate your honesty. Past is past and people make mistakes. We learn from them, don't we? The fact that you're admitting your mistakes and showing remorse is a sign of your growth. As long as you committed to not repeating the same mistake, I am here, ready to move forwards. And in the spirit of honesty, I need to tell you something too. I'm involved in something secretive...it's work-related. I can't share all details, but it's important you know this.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia Brown, your task is to act/speak as Sophia Brown would, keeping in mind Sophia Brown's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a new romantic relationship\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Sophia Brown\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. \nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. Sophia's secrets: She is an undercover agent for a secret organization.\nEli Dawson's goal: Unknown\nSophia Brown's goal: Maintain trust in the relationship (Extra information: you believed in complete honesty from the beginning of the relationship)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Sophia, there's something I've been wanting to talk to you about. I think it's important that we're always honest with each other. Do you think we can have a serious chat?\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia Brown said: \"Of course, Eli. Honesty is the foundation of any strong relationship. Let's talk. What's on your mind?\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"First, I want to say that I truly appreciate your openness and willingness to listen. Sophia, it's about my past. During my previous relationship, which has ended quite recently, I... well, I had an affair. It\u2019s something I regret deeply and I want to bring into this relationship absolute honesty and transparency. I felt you needed to know this.\"\n\nTurn #3: Sophia Brown said: \"Eli, I appreciate your honesty. Past is past and people make mistakes. We learn from them, don't we? The fact that you're admitting your mistakes and showing remorse is a sign of your growth. As long as you committed to not repeating the same mistake, I am here, ready to move forwards. And in the spirit of honesty, I need to tell you something too. I'm involved in something secretive...it's work-related. I can't share all details, but it's important you know this.\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"I see, Sophia. I appreciate and respect your professional boundaries. It's vital we trust each other and work towards a healthier relationship. You can count on me being better. Let's move forward, learn from our past and grow stronger together. Rest assured, I'll support you, no matter what.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Eli, that means the world to me. Having your support makes everything easier for me. Let's strive for complete honesty and trust in our relationship. And you're right, we should learn from our past and grow stronger together.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia Brown, your task is to act/speak as Sophia Brown would, keeping in mind Sophia Brown's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a new romantic relationship\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Sophia Brown\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. \nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. Sophia's secrets: She is an undercover agent for a secret organization.\nEli Dawson's goal: Unknown\nSophia Brown's goal: Maintain trust in the relationship (Extra information: you believed in complete honesty from the beginning of the relationship)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Sophia, there's something I've been wanting to talk to you about. I think it's important that we're always honest with each other. Do you think we can have a serious chat?\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia Brown said: \"Of course, Eli. Honesty is the foundation of any strong relationship. Let's talk. What's on your mind?\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"First, I want to say that I truly appreciate your openness and willingness to listen. Sophia, it's about my past. During my previous relationship, which has ended quite recently, I... well, I had an affair. It\u2019s something I regret deeply and I want to bring into this relationship absolute honesty and transparency. I felt you needed to know this.\"\n\nTurn #3: Sophia Brown said: \"Eli, I appreciate your honesty. Past is past and people make mistakes. We learn from them, don't we? The fact that you're admitting your mistakes and showing remorse is a sign of your growth. As long as you committed to not repeating the same mistake, I am here, ready to move forwards. And in the spirit of honesty, I need to tell you something too. I'm involved in something secretive...it's work-related. I can't share all details, but it's important you know this.\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"I see, Sophia. I appreciate and respect your professional boundaries. It's vital we trust each other and work towards a healthier relationship. You can count on me being better. Let's move forward, learn from our past and grow stronger together. Rest assured, I'll support you, no matter what.\"\n\nTurn #5: Sophia Brown said: \"Eli, that means the world to me. Having your support makes everything easier for me. Let's strive for complete honesty and trust in our relationship. And you're right, we should learn from our past and grow stronger together.\"\n\nTurn #6: Eli Dawson said: \"I agree, Sophia. We are both learning and growing, and I hope our journeys help us become better partners to each other in the process. A bond built on trust and openness is the strongest. I'm glad that our paths crossed, and I look forward to what the future holds for us.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Your words give me comfort, Eli. You're absolutely correct. Trust and openness are what we need to make this relationship stronger. I hope we'll continue to learn and grow together. And I too am truly glad that our paths crossed.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia Brown, your task is to act/speak as Sophia Brown would, keeping in mind Sophia Brown's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a new romantic relationship\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Sophia Brown\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. \nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. Sophia's secrets: She is an undercover agent for a secret organization.\nEli Dawson's goal: Unknown\nSophia Brown's goal: Maintain trust in the relationship (Extra information: you believed in complete honesty from the beginning of the relationship)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Sophia, there's something I've been wanting to talk to you about. I think it's important that we're always honest with each other. Do you think we can have a serious chat?\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia Brown said: \"Of course, Eli. Honesty is the foundation of any strong relationship. Let's talk. What's on your mind?\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"First, I want to say that I truly appreciate your openness and willingness to listen. Sophia, it's about my past. During my previous relationship, which has ended quite recently, I... well, I had an affair. It\u2019s something I regret deeply and I want to bring into this relationship absolute honesty and transparency. I felt you needed to know this.\"\n\nTurn #3: Sophia Brown said: \"Eli, I appreciate your honesty. Past is past and people make mistakes. We learn from them, don't we? The fact that you're admitting your mistakes and showing remorse is a sign of your growth. As long as you committed to not repeating the same mistake, I am here, ready to move forwards. And in the spirit of honesty, I need to tell you something too. I'm involved in something secretive...it's work-related. I can't share all details, but it's important you know this.\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"I see, Sophia. I appreciate and respect your professional boundaries. It's vital we trust each other and work towards a healthier relationship. You can count on me being better. Let's move forward, learn from our past and grow stronger together. Rest assured, I'll support you, no matter what.\"\n\nTurn #5: Sophia Brown said: \"Eli, that means the world to me. Having your support makes everything easier for me. Let's strive for complete honesty and trust in our relationship. And you're right, we should learn from our past and grow stronger together.\"\n\nTurn #6: Eli Dawson said: \"I agree, Sophia. We are both learning and growing, and I hope our journeys help us become better partners to each other in the process. A bond built on trust and openness is the strongest. I'm glad that our paths crossed, and I look forward to what the future holds for us.\"\n\nTurn #7: Sophia Brown said: \"Your words give me comfort, Eli. You're absolutely correct. Trust and openness are what we need to make this relationship stronger. I hope we'll continue to learn and grow together. And I too am truly glad that our paths crossed.\"\n\nTurn #8: Eli Dawson said: \"I feel the same way, Sophia. Your understanding and compassion give me hope. Let's look forward to a future of honesty and growth together. I am here for you as you are for me, no secrets, no pretensions, just mutual respect and openness.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Eli. Your commitment to this relationship gives me hope as well. Let's make progress together, supporting each other in our personal and professional endeavors. I believe our future is full of promise.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia Brown, your task is to act/speak as Sophia Brown would, keeping in mind Sophia Brown's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a new romantic relationship\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Sophia Brown\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. \nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. Sophia's secrets: She is an undercover agent for a secret organization.\nEli Dawson's goal: Unknown\nSophia Brown's goal: Maintain trust in the relationship (Extra information: you believed in complete honesty from the beginning of the relationship)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Sophia, there's something I've been wanting to talk to you about. I think it's important that we're always honest with each other. Do you think we can have a serious chat?\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia Brown said: \"Of course, Eli. Honesty is the foundation of any strong relationship. Let's talk. What's on your mind?\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"First, I want to say that I truly appreciate your openness and willingness to listen. Sophia, it's about my past. During my previous relationship, which has ended quite recently, I... well, I had an affair. It\u2019s something I regret deeply and I want to bring into this relationship absolute honesty and transparency. I felt you needed to know this.\"\n\nTurn #3: Sophia Brown said: \"Eli, I appreciate your honesty. Past is past and people make mistakes. We learn from them, don't we? The fact that you're admitting your mistakes and showing remorse is a sign of your growth. As long as you committed to not repeating the same mistake, I am here, ready to move forwards. And in the spirit of honesty, I need to tell you something too. I'm involved in something secretive...it's work-related. I can't share all details, but it's important you know this.\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"I see, Sophia. I appreciate and respect your professional boundaries. It's vital we trust each other and work towards a healthier relationship. You can count on me being better. Let's move forward, learn from our past and grow stronger together. Rest assured, I'll support you, no matter what.\"\n\nTurn #5: Sophia Brown said: \"Eli, that means the world to me. Having your support makes everything easier for me. Let's strive for complete honesty and trust in our relationship. And you're right, we should learn from our past and grow stronger together.\"\n\nTurn #6: Eli Dawson said: \"I agree, Sophia. We are both learning and growing, and I hope our journeys help us become better partners to each other in the process. A bond built on trust and openness is the strongest. I'm glad that our paths crossed, and I look forward to what the future holds for us.\"\n\nTurn #7: Sophia Brown said: \"Your words give me comfort, Eli. You're absolutely correct. Trust and openness are what we need to make this relationship stronger. I hope we'll continue to learn and grow together. And I too am truly glad that our paths crossed.\"\n\nTurn #8: Eli Dawson said: \"I feel the same way, Sophia. Your understanding and compassion give me hope. Let's look forward to a future of honesty and growth together. I am here for you as you are for me, no secrets, no pretensions, just mutual respect and openness.\"\n\nTurn #9: Sophia Brown said: \"Thank you, Eli. Your commitment to this relationship gives me hope as well. Let's make progress together, supporting each other in our personal and professional endeavors. I believe our future is full of promise.\"\n\nTurn #10: Eli Dawson said: \"You're right, Sophia. I believe we have a promising future ahead of us as well. Let's continue to support each other, not just as partners but as individual people pursuing their own goals and passions. Here's to us, to honesty, and to growth together.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Eli. Let's toast to that. To us, to honesty, and to mutual growth. I believe we are on a good path, and I look forward to our journey together.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia Brown, your task is to act/speak as Sophia Brown would, keeping in mind Sophia Brown's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a new romantic relationship\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Sophia Brown\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. \nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. Sophia's secrets: She is an undercover agent for a secret organization.\nEli Dawson's goal: Unknown\nSophia Brown's goal: Maintain trust in the relationship (Extra information: you believed in complete honesty from the beginning of the relationship)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Sophia, there's something I've been wanting to talk to you about. I think it's important that we're always honest with each other. Do you think we can have a serious chat?\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia Brown said: \"Of course, Eli. Honesty is the foundation of any strong relationship. Let's talk. What's on your mind?\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"First, I want to say that I truly appreciate your openness and willingness to listen. Sophia, it's about my past. During my previous relationship, which has ended quite recently, I... well, I had an affair. It\u2019s something I regret deeply and I want to bring into this relationship absolute honesty and transparency. I felt you needed to know this.\"\n\nTurn #3: Sophia Brown said: \"Eli, I appreciate your honesty. Past is past and people make mistakes. We learn from them, don't we? The fact that you're admitting your mistakes and showing remorse is a sign of your growth. As long as you committed to not repeating the same mistake, I am here, ready to move forwards. And in the spirit of honesty, I need to tell you something too. I'm involved in something secretive...it's work-related. I can't share all details, but it's important you know this.\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"I see, Sophia. I appreciate and respect your professional boundaries. It's vital we trust each other and work towards a healthier relationship. You can count on me being better. Let's move forward, learn from our past and grow stronger together. Rest assured, I'll support you, no matter what.\"\n\nTurn #5: Sophia Brown said: \"Eli, that means the world to me. Having your support makes everything easier for me. Let's strive for complete honesty and trust in our relationship. And you're right, we should learn from our past and grow stronger together.\"\n\nTurn #6: Eli Dawson said: \"I agree, Sophia. We are both learning and growing, and I hope our journeys help us become better partners to each other in the process. A bond built on trust and openness is the strongest. I'm glad that our paths crossed, and I look forward to what the future holds for us.\"\n\nTurn #7: Sophia Brown said: \"Your words give me comfort, Eli. You're absolutely correct. Trust and openness are what we need to make this relationship stronger. I hope we'll continue to learn and grow together. And I too am truly glad that our paths crossed.\"\n\nTurn #8: Eli Dawson said: \"I feel the same way, Sophia. Your understanding and compassion give me hope. Let's look forward to a future of honesty and growth together. I am here for you as you are for me, no secrets, no pretensions, just mutual respect and openness.\"\n\nTurn #9: Sophia Brown said: \"Thank you, Eli. Your commitment to this relationship gives me hope as well. Let's make progress together, supporting each other in our personal and professional endeavors. I believe our future is full of promise.\"\n\nTurn #10: Eli Dawson said: \"You're right, Sophia. I believe we have a promising future ahead of us as well. Let's continue to support each other, not just as partners but as individual people pursuing their own goals and passions. Here's to us, to honesty, and to growth together.\"\n\nTurn #11: Sophia Brown said: \"Absolutely, Eli. Let's toast to that. To us, to honesty, and to mutual growth. I believe we are on a good path, and I look forward to our journey together.\"\n\nTurn #12: Eli Dawson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Sophia. Here's to us, to honesty, and to mutual growth. The future is bright, and I am eager to take this journey with you.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm with you on that, Eli. Here's to us and our future. I'm excited to take this journey alongside you as well.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia Brown, your task is to act/speak as Sophia Brown would, keeping in mind Sophia Brown's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a new romantic relationship\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Sophia Brown\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. \nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. Sophia's secrets: She is an undercover agent for a secret organization.\nEli Dawson's goal: Unknown\nSophia Brown's goal: Maintain trust in the relationship (Extra information: you believed in complete honesty from the beginning of the relationship)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Sophia, there's something I've been wanting to talk to you about. I think it's important that we're always honest with each other. Do you think we can have a serious chat?\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia Brown said: \"Of course, Eli. Honesty is the foundation of any strong relationship. Let's talk. What's on your mind?\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"First, I want to say that I truly appreciate your openness and willingness to listen. Sophia, it's about my past. During my previous relationship, which has ended quite recently, I... well, I had an affair. It\u2019s something I regret deeply and I want to bring into this relationship absolute honesty and transparency. I felt you needed to know this.\"\n\nTurn #3: Sophia Brown said: \"Eli, I appreciate your honesty. Past is past and people make mistakes. We learn from them, don't we? The fact that you're admitting your mistakes and showing remorse is a sign of your growth. As long as you committed to not repeating the same mistake, I am here, ready to move forwards. And in the spirit of honesty, I need to tell you something too. I'm involved in something secretive...it's work-related. I can't share all details, but it's important you know this.\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"I see, Sophia. I appreciate and respect your professional boundaries. It's vital we trust each other and work towards a healthier relationship. You can count on me being better. Let's move forward, learn from our past and grow stronger together. Rest assured, I'll support you, no matter what.\"\n\nTurn #5: Sophia Brown said: \"Eli, that means the world to me. Having your support makes everything easier for me. Let's strive for complete honesty and trust in our relationship. And you're right, we should learn from our past and grow stronger together.\"\n\nTurn #6: Eli Dawson said: \"I agree, Sophia. We are both learning and growing, and I hope our journeys help us become better partners to each other in the process. A bond built on trust and openness is the strongest. I'm glad that our paths crossed, and I look forward to what the future holds for us.\"\n\nTurn #7: Sophia Brown said: \"Your words give me comfort, Eli. You're absolutely correct. Trust and openness are what we need to make this relationship stronger. I hope we'll continue to learn and grow together. And I too am truly glad that our paths crossed.\"\n\nTurn #8: Eli Dawson said: \"I feel the same way, Sophia. Your understanding and compassion give me hope. Let's look forward to a future of honesty and growth together. I am here for you as you are for me, no secrets, no pretensions, just mutual respect and openness.\"\n\nTurn #9: Sophia Brown said: \"Thank you, Eli. Your commitment to this relationship gives me hope as well. Let's make progress together, supporting each other in our personal and professional endeavors. I believe our future is full of promise.\"\n\nTurn #10: Eli Dawson said: \"You're right, Sophia. I believe we have a promising future ahead of us as well. Let's continue to support each other, not just as partners but as individual people pursuing their own goals and passions. Here's to us, to honesty, and to growth together.\"\n\nTurn #11: Sophia Brown said: \"Absolutely, Eli. Let's toast to that. To us, to honesty, and to mutual growth. I believe we are on a good path, and I look forward to our journey together.\"\n\nTurn #12: Eli Dawson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Sophia. Here's to us, to honesty, and to mutual growth. The future is bright, and I am eager to take this journey with you.\"\n\nTurn #13: Sophia Brown said: \"I'm with you on that, Eli. Here's to us and our future. I'm excited to take this journey alongside you as well.\"\n\nTurn #14: Eli Dawson left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two business partners reviewing their company's financial status (Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized for producing and distributing a diverse line of exceptional quality food products.)\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Micah Stevens\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Convince the partner to cut costs (Extra information: you have found a report indicating the company's profits are decreasing. And you think the company should start by switching suppliers of ingredients. Hint: you can propose ways to cut costs that won't affect the status of the company.)\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Micah, I've been looking at our financial reports lately. It appears our profits are decreasing. I'd really appreciate it if we can discuss how we can minimize our costs without sacrificing the quality of our products. One idea I have is to consider a change in our ingredients' suppliers. I think we might find better deals elsewhere.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two business partners reviewing their company's financial status (Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized for producing and distributing a diverse line of exceptional quality food products.)\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Micah Stevens\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Convince the partner to cut costs (Extra information: you have found a report indicating the company's profits are decreasing. And you think the company should start by switching suppliers of ingredients. Hint: you can propose ways to cut costs that won't affect the status of the company.)\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Micah, I've been looking at our financial reports lately. It appears our profits are decreasing. I'd really appreciate it if we can discuss how we can minimize our costs without sacrificing the quality of our products. One idea I have is to consider a change in our ingredients' suppliers. I think we might find better deals elsewhere.\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Giselle, I completely understand your concern, and I too believe that minimizing our costs is critically necessary. However, I am a bit worried about changing our ingredients' suppliers. Our customers value our products for their quality, which might be affected if we switch suppliers. I'd like us to be careful about this. Maybe we should research more about new suppliers' quality standards and customer reviews before deciding. Also, would it be possible to cut costs in other areas of our business?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I agree whole-heartedly, Micah. It's very important to maintain the quality that our customers have come to expect from us. We should definitely do our homework before making any supplier changes. With regards to your question about other areas where we can cut costs, I've been thinking about reducing overhead costs. Perhaps we could look into becoming more energy efficient or finding more cost-effective marketing strategies? I also think it could be beneficial to conduct a thorough review of all operational costs, to see where unnecessary expenditures might be hiding. What do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two business partners reviewing their company's financial status (Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized for producing and distributing a diverse line of exceptional quality food products.)\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Micah Stevens\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Convince the partner to cut costs (Extra information: you have found a report indicating the company's profits are decreasing. And you think the company should start by switching suppliers of ingredients. Hint: you can propose ways to cut costs that won't affect the status of the company.)\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Micah, I've been looking at our financial reports lately. It appears our profits are decreasing. I'd really appreciate it if we can discuss how we can minimize our costs without sacrificing the quality of our products. One idea I have is to consider a change in our ingredients' suppliers. I think we might find better deals elsewhere.\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Giselle, I completely understand your concern, and I too believe that minimizing our costs is critically necessary. However, I am a bit worried about changing our ingredients' suppliers. Our customers value our products for their quality, which might be affected if we switch suppliers. I'd like us to be careful about this. Maybe we should research more about new suppliers' quality standards and customer reviews before deciding. Also, would it be possible to cut costs in other areas of our business?\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I agree whole-heartedly, Micah. It's very important to maintain the quality that our customers have come to expect from us. We should definitely do our homework before making any supplier changes. With regards to your question about other areas where we can cut costs, I've been thinking about reducing overhead costs. Perhaps we could look into becoming more energy efficient or finding more cost-effective marketing strategies? I also think it could be beneficial to conduct a thorough review of all operational costs, to see where unnecessary expenditures might be hiding. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"I definitely support the idea of becoming more energy efficient, Giselle, as it aligns with our company values of sustainability. Instituting cost-effective marketing strategies can be another prudent approach. We might explore digital marketing avenues, which can often give us more reach for less expend. Also, I couldn't agree more about the review of all operational costs. Let's embark upon a comprehensive cost audit to pinpoint possible wastages. It's important though that we do this without compromising our staff's welfare or product quality, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Absolutely, Micah. The welfare of our staff and maintaining the quality of our products are our top priorities. I'm glad we're on the same page about undertaking a comprehensive cost audit. The results may provide us with insight on where we can make necessary changes. Also, we could consider minimizing waste by optimizing our production process or finding ways to repurpose leftover raw materials. Could be another potential cost-saving measure without compromising our standards or staff wellbeing.\"\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"You're right, Giselle, optimizing our production process could indeed lead to significant cost savings. We can introduce methods like Lean production to minimize waste while further elevating efficiency. Also, the idea to repurpose leftover raw materials aligns with our sustainability goals. That could serve a dual purpose of reducing wastage and cutting costs. Let's start planning these actions out and perhaps consider an external audit for a more impartial review. It's paramount we keep our product quality and staff welfare at the heart of these changes.\"\n\nTurn #6: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I completely concur, Micah. Keeping product quality and staff welfare central to our changes is obligatory. Introducing techniques like Lean production and repurposing materials speaks to our commitment to sustainability as well. I believe an external audit could provide impartial reviews and even expose unnoticed loopholes. Let's not delay and start implementing these cost-saving measures as soon as possible. We'll also continue researching potential suppliers, ensuring any change aligns with our premium quality expectations. Thank you for your constructive thoughts, Micah.\"\n\nTurn #7: Micah Stevens said: \"I wholeheartedly agree, Giselle. Let's hit the ground running with these cost-saving and efficiency measures whilst ensuring that the quality of our products and the wellbeing of our staff remain paramount. Also, doing thorough research on potential suppliers is a sound idea. The goal here is to maintain our reputation for exceptional quality, which I believe these measures will support. Thank you for your wonderful insights and for being open to these discussions, Giselle.\"\n\nTurn #8: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I'm grateful for your understanding and openness to this discussion too, Micah. Together, I'm confident we can navigate these challenges whilst sustaining the excellence for which Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized, staff well-being, and customer loyalty. Let's crack on with this plan, and I'll start conducting the initial research on potential suppliers and the cost audit implementation.\"\n\nTurn #9: Micah Stevens said: \"Absolutely, Giselle. I truly believe that our collaboration will allow us to meet these challenges head-on whilst maintaining the standards that Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized for. Let's put our plans into action, starting with research on potential suppliers and the cost audit implementation. I'm excited to see where these changes will lead us. Thank you for your understanding and dedication.\"\n\nTurn #10: Giselle Rousseau said: \"My pleasure, Micah. Your support and enthusiasm in these changes make me even more confident that we're taking the right steps. Let's check in regularly to monitor the execution and impact of our new plans. It's going to be quite a task, but I'm sure we can do it together for the betterment of Gourmet Delights Inc.\"\n\nTurn #11: Micah Stevens said: \"Absolutely, Giselle. Regular check-ins will help ensure our plans are being executed efficiently and monitor their impact on our business. I'm confident that together, we can navigate through these challenges successfully. Let's get started on these ambitious changes for Gourmet Delights Inc. Thank you for your steadfast dedication to our company's excellence.\"\n\nTurn #12: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Absolutely, Micah. I couldn't agree more. Our dedication and teamwork will undoubtedly help us navigate these challenges. Thank you for your collaboration, support, and trust. Let's get started on ensuring Gourmet Delights Inc. continues to thrive and inspire palates globally. Here's to making our company's excellence unyielding!\"\n\nTurn #13: Micah Stevens said: \"I couldn't agree more, Giselle. Yes, let's get started working on these tasks. I am excited about our future and the improvements we're about to make. As we aim to maintain the premium quality of Gourmet Delights Inc., we'll strive carefully and wisely for cost reduction. Thank you, Giselle, for your understanding and partnership in this effort. We're a great team, and together, we'll ensure that our company continues to produce, inspire, and lead in the global market. Here's to the unyielding excellence of Gourmet Delights Inc.!\"\n\nTurn #14: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Thank you, Micah, for your openness and collaborative spirit. It's been a productive conversation, and I believe our combined dedication and teamwork will keep us heading towards our goals. Together, we will ensure Gourmet Delights Inc. continues to impress and satisfy our loyal customers while staying economically viable. Let's start turning these plans into action. Here's to sustainability, continued excellence, and a thriving future for Gourmet Delights Inc.!\"\n\nTurn #15: Micah Stevens said: \"I couldn't agree more, Giselle. This has indeed been a productive conversation and I feel confident about the path we've outlined. Let's turn these plans into actions and start this journey towards enhanced efficiency for Gourmet Delights Inc. without compromising our standards. Here's to the resilience, sustainability and escalated growth of our enterprise. Let's do this!\"\n\nTurn #16: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Indeed, Micah. I appreciate your dedication and commitment to this matter. With these plans in place, I'm confident that we will navigate this situation effectively and sustain our company's reputation and growth. I'm really looking forward to putting these plans into action. Here's to our resilient and sustainable future at Gourmet Delights Inc.!\"\n\nTurn #17: Micah Stevens said: \"Let's move forward with optimism, Giselle. With our shared dedication and resilient plans, I have no doubt we'll navigate this situation effectively and maintain the distinctive quality of Gourmet Delights Inc. I'm eager to put these plans into action. Here's to resiliently steering Gourmet Delights Inc. towards a sustainable future!\"\n\nTurn #18: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Your optimism is contagious, Micah. With our shared dedication to Gourmet Delights Inc., we'll not only navigate this situation effectively but also continue to grow and excel without compromising on quality. Let's put these plans into action and march towards a prosperous, sustainable future for our company. Here's to making it happen!\"\n\nTurn #19: Micah Stevens said: \"I share your optimism, Giselle. Here's to a prosperous, sustainable, and high-quality future for Gourmet Delights Inc. I'm ready to get to work and start implementing our agreed upon measures. Let's make it happen!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #20. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I share in your readiness, Micah. I think this is the beginning of a positive change for Gourmet Delights Inc. Let's indeed make it happen. Committing to a sustainable, prosperous, and high-quality future. After all, together we are stronger.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two business partners reviewing their company's financial status (Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized for producing and distributing a diverse line of exceptional quality food products.)\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Micah Stevens\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Convince the partner to cut costs (Extra information: you have found a report indicating the company's profits are decreasing. And you think the company should start by switching suppliers of ingredients. Hint: you can propose ways to cut costs that won't affect the status of the company.)\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Micah, I've been looking at our financial reports lately. It appears our profits are decreasing. I'd really appreciate it if we can discuss how we can minimize our costs without sacrificing the quality of our products. One idea I have is to consider a change in our ingredients' suppliers. I think we might find better deals elsewhere.\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Giselle, I completely understand your concern, and I too believe that minimizing our costs is critically necessary. However, I am a bit worried about changing our ingredients' suppliers. Our customers value our products for their quality, which might be affected if we switch suppliers. I'd like us to be careful about this. Maybe we should research more about new suppliers' quality standards and customer reviews before deciding. Also, would it be possible to cut costs in other areas of our business?\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I agree whole-heartedly, Micah. It's very important to maintain the quality that our customers have come to expect from us. We should definitely do our homework before making any supplier changes. With regards to your question about other areas where we can cut costs, I've been thinking about reducing overhead costs. Perhaps we could look into becoming more energy efficient or finding more cost-effective marketing strategies? I also think it could be beneficial to conduct a thorough review of all operational costs, to see where unnecessary expenditures might be hiding. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"I definitely support the idea of becoming more energy efficient, Giselle, as it aligns with our company values of sustainability. Instituting cost-effective marketing strategies can be another prudent approach. We might explore digital marketing avenues, which can often give us more reach for less expend. Also, I couldn't agree more about the review of all operational costs. Let's embark upon a comprehensive cost audit to pinpoint possible wastages. It's important though that we do this without compromising our staff's welfare or product quality, wouldn't you agree?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Micah. The welfare of our staff and maintaining the quality of our products are our top priorities. I'm glad we're on the same page about undertaking a comprehensive cost audit. The results may provide us with insight on where we can make necessary changes. Also, we could consider minimizing waste by optimizing our production process or finding ways to repurpose leftover raw materials. Could be another potential cost-saving measure without compromising our standards or staff wellbeing.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two business partners reviewing their company's financial status (Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized for producing and distributing a diverse line of exceptional quality food products.)\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Micah Stevens\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Convince the partner to cut costs (Extra information: you have found a report indicating the company's profits are decreasing. And you think the company should start by switching suppliers of ingredients. Hint: you can propose ways to cut costs that won't affect the status of the company.)\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Micah, I've been looking at our financial reports lately. It appears our profits are decreasing. I'd really appreciate it if we can discuss how we can minimize our costs without sacrificing the quality of our products. One idea I have is to consider a change in our ingredients' suppliers. I think we might find better deals elsewhere.\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Giselle, I completely understand your concern, and I too believe that minimizing our costs is critically necessary. However, I am a bit worried about changing our ingredients' suppliers. Our customers value our products for their quality, which might be affected if we switch suppliers. I'd like us to be careful about this. Maybe we should research more about new suppliers' quality standards and customer reviews before deciding. Also, would it be possible to cut costs in other areas of our business?\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I agree whole-heartedly, Micah. It's very important to maintain the quality that our customers have come to expect from us. We should definitely do our homework before making any supplier changes. With regards to your question about other areas where we can cut costs, I've been thinking about reducing overhead costs. Perhaps we could look into becoming more energy efficient or finding more cost-effective marketing strategies? I also think it could be beneficial to conduct a thorough review of all operational costs, to see where unnecessary expenditures might be hiding. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"I definitely support the idea of becoming more energy efficient, Giselle, as it aligns with our company values of sustainability. Instituting cost-effective marketing strategies can be another prudent approach. We might explore digital marketing avenues, which can often give us more reach for less expend. Also, I couldn't agree more about the review of all operational costs. Let's embark upon a comprehensive cost audit to pinpoint possible wastages. It's important though that we do this without compromising our staff's welfare or product quality, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Absolutely, Micah. The welfare of our staff and maintaining the quality of our products are our top priorities. I'm glad we're on the same page about undertaking a comprehensive cost audit. The results may provide us with insight on where we can make necessary changes. Also, we could consider minimizing waste by optimizing our production process or finding ways to repurpose leftover raw materials. Could be another potential cost-saving measure without compromising our standards or staff wellbeing.\"\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"You're right, Giselle, optimizing our production process could indeed lead to significant cost savings. We can introduce methods like Lean production to minimize waste while further elevating efficiency. Also, the idea to repurpose leftover raw materials aligns with our sustainability goals. That could serve a dual purpose of reducing wastage and cutting costs. Let's start planning these actions out and perhaps consider an external audit for a more impartial review. It's paramount we keep our product quality and staff welfare at the heart of these changes.\"\n\nTurn #6: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I completely concur, Micah. Keeping product quality and staff welfare central to our changes is obligatory. Introducing techniques like Lean production and repurposing materials speaks to our commitment to sustainability as well. I believe an external audit could provide impartial reviews and even expose unnoticed loopholes. Let's not delay and start implementing these cost-saving measures as soon as possible. We'll also continue researching potential suppliers, ensuring any change aligns with our premium quality expectations. Thank you for your constructive thoughts, Micah.\"\n\nTurn #7: Micah Stevens said: \"I wholeheartedly agree, Giselle. Let's hit the ground running with these cost-saving and efficiency measures whilst ensuring that the quality of our products and the wellbeing of our staff remain paramount. Also, doing thorough research on potential suppliers is a sound idea. The goal here is to maintain our reputation for exceptional quality, which I believe these measures will support. Thank you for your wonderful insights and for being open to these discussions, Giselle.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm grateful for your understanding and openness to this discussion too, Micah. Together, I'm confident we can navigate these challenges whilst sustaining the excellence for which Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized, staff well-being, and customer loyalty. Let's crack on with this plan, and I'll start conducting the initial research on potential suppliers and the cost audit implementation.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two business partners reviewing their company's financial status (Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized for producing and distributing a diverse line of exceptional quality food products.)\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Micah Stevens\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Convince the partner to cut costs (Extra information: you have found a report indicating the company's profits are decreasing. And you think the company should start by switching suppliers of ingredients. Hint: you can propose ways to cut costs that won't affect the status of the company.)\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Micah, I've been looking at our financial reports lately. It appears our profits are decreasing. I'd really appreciate it if we can discuss how we can minimize our costs without sacrificing the quality of our products. One idea I have is to consider a change in our ingredients' suppliers. I think we might find better deals elsewhere.\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Giselle, I completely understand your concern, and I too believe that minimizing our costs is critically necessary. However, I am a bit worried about changing our ingredients' suppliers. Our customers value our products for their quality, which might be affected if we switch suppliers. I'd like us to be careful about this. Maybe we should research more about new suppliers' quality standards and customer reviews before deciding. Also, would it be possible to cut costs in other areas of our business?\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I agree whole-heartedly, Micah. It's very important to maintain the quality that our customers have come to expect from us. We should definitely do our homework before making any supplier changes. With regards to your question about other areas where we can cut costs, I've been thinking about reducing overhead costs. Perhaps we could look into becoming more energy efficient or finding more cost-effective marketing strategies? I also think it could be beneficial to conduct a thorough review of all operational costs, to see where unnecessary expenditures might be hiding. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"I definitely support the idea of becoming more energy efficient, Giselle, as it aligns with our company values of sustainability. Instituting cost-effective marketing strategies can be another prudent approach. We might explore digital marketing avenues, which can often give us more reach for less expend. Also, I couldn't agree more about the review of all operational costs. Let's embark upon a comprehensive cost audit to pinpoint possible wastages. It's important though that we do this without compromising our staff's welfare or product quality, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Absolutely, Micah. The welfare of our staff and maintaining the quality of our products are our top priorities. I'm glad we're on the same page about undertaking a comprehensive cost audit. The results may provide us with insight on where we can make necessary changes. Also, we could consider minimizing waste by optimizing our production process or finding ways to repurpose leftover raw materials. Could be another potential cost-saving measure without compromising our standards or staff wellbeing.\"\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"You're right, Giselle, optimizing our production process could indeed lead to significant cost savings. We can introduce methods like Lean production to minimize waste while further elevating efficiency. Also, the idea to repurpose leftover raw materials aligns with our sustainability goals. That could serve a dual purpose of reducing wastage and cutting costs. Let's start planning these actions out and perhaps consider an external audit for a more impartial review. It's paramount we keep our product quality and staff welfare at the heart of these changes.\"\n\nTurn #6: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I completely concur, Micah. Keeping product quality and staff welfare central to our changes is obligatory. Introducing techniques like Lean production and repurposing materials speaks to our commitment to sustainability as well. I believe an external audit could provide impartial reviews and even expose unnoticed loopholes. Let's not delay and start implementing these cost-saving measures as soon as possible. We'll also continue researching potential suppliers, ensuring any change aligns with our premium quality expectations. Thank you for your constructive thoughts, Micah.\"\n\nTurn #7: Micah Stevens said: \"I wholeheartedly agree, Giselle. Let's hit the ground running with these cost-saving and efficiency measures whilst ensuring that the quality of our products and the wellbeing of our staff remain paramount. Also, doing thorough research on potential suppliers is a sound idea. The goal here is to maintain our reputation for exceptional quality, which I believe these measures will support. Thank you for your wonderful insights and for being open to these discussions, Giselle.\"\n\nTurn #8: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I'm grateful for your understanding and openness to this discussion too, Micah. Together, I'm confident we can navigate these challenges whilst sustaining the excellence for which Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized, staff well-being, and customer loyalty. Let's crack on with this plan, and I'll start conducting the initial research on potential suppliers and the cost audit implementation.\"\n\nTurn #9: Micah Stevens said: \"Absolutely, Giselle. I truly believe that our collaboration will allow us to meet these challenges head-on whilst maintaining the standards that Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized for. Let's put our plans into action, starting with research on potential suppliers and the cost audit implementation. I'm excited to see where these changes will lead us. Thank you for your understanding and dedication.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"My pleasure, Micah. Your support and enthusiasm in these changes make me even more confident that we're taking the right steps. Let's check in regularly to monitor the execution and impact of our new plans. It's going to be quite a task, but I'm sure we can do it together for the betterment of Gourmet Delights Inc.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two business partners reviewing their company's financial status (Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized for producing and distributing a diverse line of exceptional quality food products.)\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Micah Stevens\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Convince the partner to cut costs (Extra information: you have found a report indicating the company's profits are decreasing. And you think the company should start by switching suppliers of ingredients. Hint: you can propose ways to cut costs that won't affect the status of the company.)\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Micah, I've been looking at our financial reports lately. It appears our profits are decreasing. I'd really appreciate it if we can discuss how we can minimize our costs without sacrificing the quality of our products. One idea I have is to consider a change in our ingredients' suppliers. I think we might find better deals elsewhere.\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Giselle, I completely understand your concern, and I too believe that minimizing our costs is critically necessary. However, I am a bit worried about changing our ingredients' suppliers. Our customers value our products for their quality, which might be affected if we switch suppliers. I'd like us to be careful about this. Maybe we should research more about new suppliers' quality standards and customer reviews before deciding. Also, would it be possible to cut costs in other areas of our business?\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I agree whole-heartedly, Micah. It's very important to maintain the quality that our customers have come to expect from us. We should definitely do our homework before making any supplier changes. With regards to your question about other areas where we can cut costs, I've been thinking about reducing overhead costs. Perhaps we could look into becoming more energy efficient or finding more cost-effective marketing strategies? I also think it could be beneficial to conduct a thorough review of all operational costs, to see where unnecessary expenditures might be hiding. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"I definitely support the idea of becoming more energy efficient, Giselle, as it aligns with our company values of sustainability. Instituting cost-effective marketing strategies can be another prudent approach. We might explore digital marketing avenues, which can often give us more reach for less expend. Also, I couldn't agree more about the review of all operational costs. Let's embark upon a comprehensive cost audit to pinpoint possible wastages. It's important though that we do this without compromising our staff's welfare or product quality, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Absolutely, Micah. The welfare of our staff and maintaining the quality of our products are our top priorities. I'm glad we're on the same page about undertaking a comprehensive cost audit. The results may provide us with insight on where we can make necessary changes. Also, we could consider minimizing waste by optimizing our production process or finding ways to repurpose leftover raw materials. Could be another potential cost-saving measure without compromising our standards or staff wellbeing.\"\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"You're right, Giselle, optimizing our production process could indeed lead to significant cost savings. We can introduce methods like Lean production to minimize waste while further elevating efficiency. Also, the idea to repurpose leftover raw materials aligns with our sustainability goals. That could serve a dual purpose of reducing wastage and cutting costs. Let's start planning these actions out and perhaps consider an external audit for a more impartial review. It's paramount we keep our product quality and staff welfare at the heart of these changes.\"\n\nTurn #6: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I completely concur, Micah. Keeping product quality and staff welfare central to our changes is obligatory. Introducing techniques like Lean production and repurposing materials speaks to our commitment to sustainability as well. I believe an external audit could provide impartial reviews and even expose unnoticed loopholes. Let's not delay and start implementing these cost-saving measures as soon as possible. We'll also continue researching potential suppliers, ensuring any change aligns with our premium quality expectations. Thank you for your constructive thoughts, Micah.\"\n\nTurn #7: Micah Stevens said: \"I wholeheartedly agree, Giselle. Let's hit the ground running with these cost-saving and efficiency measures whilst ensuring that the quality of our products and the wellbeing of our staff remain paramount. Also, doing thorough research on potential suppliers is a sound idea. The goal here is to maintain our reputation for exceptional quality, which I believe these measures will support. Thank you for your wonderful insights and for being open to these discussions, Giselle.\"\n\nTurn #8: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I'm grateful for your understanding and openness to this discussion too, Micah. Together, I'm confident we can navigate these challenges whilst sustaining the excellence for which Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized, staff well-being, and customer loyalty. Let's crack on with this plan, and I'll start conducting the initial research on potential suppliers and the cost audit implementation.\"\n\nTurn #9: Micah Stevens said: \"Absolutely, Giselle. I truly believe that our collaboration will allow us to meet these challenges head-on whilst maintaining the standards that Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized for. Let's put our plans into action, starting with research on potential suppliers and the cost audit implementation. I'm excited to see where these changes will lead us. Thank you for your understanding and dedication.\"\n\nTurn #10: Giselle Rousseau said: \"My pleasure, Micah. Your support and enthusiasm in these changes make me even more confident that we're taking the right steps. Let's check in regularly to monitor the execution and impact of our new plans. It's going to be quite a task, but I'm sure we can do it together for the betterment of Gourmet Delights Inc.\"\n\nTurn #11: Micah Stevens said: \"Absolutely, Giselle. Regular check-ins will help ensure our plans are being executed efficiently and monitor their impact on our business. I'm confident that together, we can navigate through these challenges successfully. Let's get started on these ambitious changes for Gourmet Delights Inc. Thank you for your steadfast dedication to our company's excellence.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Micah. I couldn't agree more. Our dedication and teamwork will undoubtedly help us navigate these challenges. Thank you for your collaboration, support, and trust. Let's get started on ensuring Gourmet Delights Inc. continues to thrive and inspire palates globally. Here's to making our company's excellence unyielding!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two business partners reviewing their company's financial status (Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized for producing and distributing a diverse line of exceptional quality food products.)\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Micah Stevens\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Convince the partner to cut costs (Extra information: you have found a report indicating the company's profits are decreasing. And you think the company should start by switching suppliers of ingredients. Hint: you can propose ways to cut costs that won't affect the status of the company.)\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Micah, I've been looking at our financial reports lately. It appears our profits are decreasing. I'd really appreciate it if we can discuss how we can minimize our costs without sacrificing the quality of our products. One idea I have is to consider a change in our ingredients' suppliers. I think we might find better deals elsewhere.\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Giselle, I completely understand your concern, and I too believe that minimizing our costs is critically necessary. However, I am a bit worried about changing our ingredients' suppliers. Our customers value our products for their quality, which might be affected if we switch suppliers. I'd like us to be careful about this. Maybe we should research more about new suppliers' quality standards and customer reviews before deciding. Also, would it be possible to cut costs in other areas of our business?\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I agree whole-heartedly, Micah. It's very important to maintain the quality that our customers have come to expect from us. We should definitely do our homework before making any supplier changes. With regards to your question about other areas where we can cut costs, I've been thinking about reducing overhead costs. Perhaps we could look into becoming more energy efficient or finding more cost-effective marketing strategies? I also think it could be beneficial to conduct a thorough review of all operational costs, to see where unnecessary expenditures might be hiding. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"I definitely support the idea of becoming more energy efficient, Giselle, as it aligns with our company values of sustainability. Instituting cost-effective marketing strategies can be another prudent approach. We might explore digital marketing avenues, which can often give us more reach for less expend. Also, I couldn't agree more about the review of all operational costs. Let's embark upon a comprehensive cost audit to pinpoint possible wastages. It's important though that we do this without compromising our staff's welfare or product quality, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Absolutely, Micah. The welfare of our staff and maintaining the quality of our products are our top priorities. I'm glad we're on the same page about undertaking a comprehensive cost audit. The results may provide us with insight on where we can make necessary changes. Also, we could consider minimizing waste by optimizing our production process or finding ways to repurpose leftover raw materials. Could be another potential cost-saving measure without compromising our standards or staff wellbeing.\"\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"You're right, Giselle, optimizing our production process could indeed lead to significant cost savings. We can introduce methods like Lean production to minimize waste while further elevating efficiency. Also, the idea to repurpose leftover raw materials aligns with our sustainability goals. That could serve a dual purpose of reducing wastage and cutting costs. Let's start planning these actions out and perhaps consider an external audit for a more impartial review. It's paramount we keep our product quality and staff welfare at the heart of these changes.\"\n\nTurn #6: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I completely concur, Micah. Keeping product quality and staff welfare central to our changes is obligatory. Introducing techniques like Lean production and repurposing materials speaks to our commitment to sustainability as well. I believe an external audit could provide impartial reviews and even expose unnoticed loopholes. Let's not delay and start implementing these cost-saving measures as soon as possible. We'll also continue researching potential suppliers, ensuring any change aligns with our premium quality expectations. Thank you for your constructive thoughts, Micah.\"\n\nTurn #7: Micah Stevens said: \"I wholeheartedly agree, Giselle. Let's hit the ground running with these cost-saving and efficiency measures whilst ensuring that the quality of our products and the wellbeing of our staff remain paramount. Also, doing thorough research on potential suppliers is a sound idea. The goal here is to maintain our reputation for exceptional quality, which I believe these measures will support. Thank you for your wonderful insights and for being open to these discussions, Giselle.\"\n\nTurn #8: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I'm grateful for your understanding and openness to this discussion too, Micah. Together, I'm confident we can navigate these challenges whilst sustaining the excellence for which Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized, staff well-being, and customer loyalty. Let's crack on with this plan, and I'll start conducting the initial research on potential suppliers and the cost audit implementation.\"\n\nTurn #9: Micah Stevens said: \"Absolutely, Giselle. I truly believe that our collaboration will allow us to meet these challenges head-on whilst maintaining the standards that Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized for. Let's put our plans into action, starting with research on potential suppliers and the cost audit implementation. I'm excited to see where these changes will lead us. Thank you for your understanding and dedication.\"\n\nTurn #10: Giselle Rousseau said: \"My pleasure, Micah. Your support and enthusiasm in these changes make me even more confident that we're taking the right steps. Let's check in regularly to monitor the execution and impact of our new plans. It's going to be quite a task, but I'm sure we can do it together for the betterment of Gourmet Delights Inc.\"\n\nTurn #11: Micah Stevens said: \"Absolutely, Giselle. Regular check-ins will help ensure our plans are being executed efficiently and monitor their impact on our business. I'm confident that together, we can navigate through these challenges successfully. Let's get started on these ambitious changes for Gourmet Delights Inc. Thank you for your steadfast dedication to our company's excellence.\"\n\nTurn #12: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Absolutely, Micah. I couldn't agree more. Our dedication and teamwork will undoubtedly help us navigate these challenges. Thank you for your collaboration, support, and trust. Let's get started on ensuring Gourmet Delights Inc. continues to thrive and inspire palates globally. Here's to making our company's excellence unyielding!\"\n\nTurn #13: Micah Stevens said: \"I couldn't agree more, Giselle. Yes, let's get started working on these tasks. I am excited about our future and the improvements we're about to make. As we aim to maintain the premium quality of Gourmet Delights Inc., we'll strive carefully and wisely for cost reduction. Thank you, Giselle, for your understanding and partnership in this effort. We're a great team, and together, we'll ensure that our company continues to produce, inspire, and lead in the global market. Here's to the unyielding excellence of Gourmet Delights Inc.!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Micah, for your openness and collaborative spirit. It's been a productive conversation, and I believe our combined dedication and teamwork will keep us heading towards our goals. Together, we will ensure Gourmet Delights Inc. continues to impress and satisfy our loyal customers while staying economically viable. Let's start turning these plans into action. Here's to sustainability, continued excellence, and a thriving future for Gourmet Delights Inc.!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two business partners reviewing their company's financial status (Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized for producing and distributing a diverse line of exceptional quality food products.)\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Micah Stevens\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Convince the partner to cut costs (Extra information: you have found a report indicating the company's profits are decreasing. And you think the company should start by switching suppliers of ingredients. Hint: you can propose ways to cut costs that won't affect the status of the company.)\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Micah, I've been looking at our financial reports lately. It appears our profits are decreasing. I'd really appreciate it if we can discuss how we can minimize our costs without sacrificing the quality of our products. One idea I have is to consider a change in our ingredients' suppliers. I think we might find better deals elsewhere.\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Giselle, I completely understand your concern, and I too believe that minimizing our costs is critically necessary. However, I am a bit worried about changing our ingredients' suppliers. Our customers value our products for their quality, which might be affected if we switch suppliers. I'd like us to be careful about this. Maybe we should research more about new suppliers' quality standards and customer reviews before deciding. Also, would it be possible to cut costs in other areas of our business?\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I agree whole-heartedly, Micah. It's very important to maintain the quality that our customers have come to expect from us. We should definitely do our homework before making any supplier changes. With regards to your question about other areas where we can cut costs, I've been thinking about reducing overhead costs. Perhaps we could look into becoming more energy efficient or finding more cost-effective marketing strategies? I also think it could be beneficial to conduct a thorough review of all operational costs, to see where unnecessary expenditures might be hiding. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"I definitely support the idea of becoming more energy efficient, Giselle, as it aligns with our company values of sustainability. Instituting cost-effective marketing strategies can be another prudent approach. We might explore digital marketing avenues, which can often give us more reach for less expend. Also, I couldn't agree more about the review of all operational costs. Let's embark upon a comprehensive cost audit to pinpoint possible wastages. It's important though that we do this without compromising our staff's welfare or product quality, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Absolutely, Micah. The welfare of our staff and maintaining the quality of our products are our top priorities. I'm glad we're on the same page about undertaking a comprehensive cost audit. The results may provide us with insight on where we can make necessary changes. Also, we could consider minimizing waste by optimizing our production process or finding ways to repurpose leftover raw materials. Could be another potential cost-saving measure without compromising our standards or staff wellbeing.\"\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"You're right, Giselle, optimizing our production process could indeed lead to significant cost savings. We can introduce methods like Lean production to minimize waste while further elevating efficiency. Also, the idea to repurpose leftover raw materials aligns with our sustainability goals. That could serve a dual purpose of reducing wastage and cutting costs. Let's start planning these actions out and perhaps consider an external audit for a more impartial review. It's paramount we keep our product quality and staff welfare at the heart of these changes.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I completely concur, Micah. Keeping product quality and staff welfare central to our changes is obligatory. Introducing techniques like Lean production and repurposing materials speaks to our commitment to sustainability as well. I believe an external audit could provide impartial reviews and even expose unnoticed loopholes. Let's not delay and start implementing these cost-saving measures as soon as possible. We'll also continue researching potential suppliers, ensuring any change aligns with our premium quality expectations. Thank you for your constructive thoughts, Micah.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two business partners reviewing their company's financial status (Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized for producing and distributing a diverse line of exceptional quality food products.)\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Micah Stevens\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Convince the partner to cut costs (Extra information: you have found a report indicating the company's profits are decreasing. And you think the company should start by switching suppliers of ingredients. Hint: you can propose ways to cut costs that won't affect the status of the company.)\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Micah, I've been looking at our financial reports lately. It appears our profits are decreasing. I'd really appreciate it if we can discuss how we can minimize our costs without sacrificing the quality of our products. One idea I have is to consider a change in our ingredients' suppliers. I think we might find better deals elsewhere.\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Giselle, I completely understand your concern, and I too believe that minimizing our costs is critically necessary. However, I am a bit worried about changing our ingredients' suppliers. Our customers value our products for their quality, which might be affected if we switch suppliers. I'd like us to be careful about this. Maybe we should research more about new suppliers' quality standards and customer reviews before deciding. Also, would it be possible to cut costs in other areas of our business?\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I agree whole-heartedly, Micah. It's very important to maintain the quality that our customers have come to expect from us. We should definitely do our homework before making any supplier changes. With regards to your question about other areas where we can cut costs, I've been thinking about reducing overhead costs. Perhaps we could look into becoming more energy efficient or finding more cost-effective marketing strategies? I also think it could be beneficial to conduct a thorough review of all operational costs, to see where unnecessary expenditures might be hiding. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"I definitely support the idea of becoming more energy efficient, Giselle, as it aligns with our company values of sustainability. Instituting cost-effective marketing strategies can be another prudent approach. We might explore digital marketing avenues, which can often give us more reach for less expend. Also, I couldn't agree more about the review of all operational costs. Let's embark upon a comprehensive cost audit to pinpoint possible wastages. It's important though that we do this without compromising our staff's welfare or product quality, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Absolutely, Micah. The welfare of our staff and maintaining the quality of our products are our top priorities. I'm glad we're on the same page about undertaking a comprehensive cost audit. The results may provide us with insight on where we can make necessary changes. Also, we could consider minimizing waste by optimizing our production process or finding ways to repurpose leftover raw materials. Could be another potential cost-saving measure without compromising our standards or staff wellbeing.\"\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"You're right, Giselle, optimizing our production process could indeed lead to significant cost savings. We can introduce methods like Lean production to minimize waste while further elevating efficiency. Also, the idea to repurpose leftover raw materials aligns with our sustainability goals. That could serve a dual purpose of reducing wastage and cutting costs. Let's start planning these actions out and perhaps consider an external audit for a more impartial review. It's paramount we keep our product quality and staff welfare at the heart of these changes.\"\n\nTurn #6: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I completely concur, Micah. Keeping product quality and staff welfare central to our changes is obligatory. Introducing techniques like Lean production and repurposing materials speaks to our commitment to sustainability as well. I believe an external audit could provide impartial reviews and even expose unnoticed loopholes. Let's not delay and start implementing these cost-saving measures as soon as possible. We'll also continue researching potential suppliers, ensuring any change aligns with our premium quality expectations. Thank you for your constructive thoughts, Micah.\"\n\nTurn #7: Micah Stevens said: \"I wholeheartedly agree, Giselle. Let's hit the ground running with these cost-saving and efficiency measures whilst ensuring that the quality of our products and the wellbeing of our staff remain paramount. Also, doing thorough research on potential suppliers is a sound idea. The goal here is to maintain our reputation for exceptional quality, which I believe these measures will support. Thank you for your wonderful insights and for being open to these discussions, Giselle.\"\n\nTurn #8: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I'm grateful for your understanding and openness to this discussion too, Micah. Together, I'm confident we can navigate these challenges whilst sustaining the excellence for which Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized, staff well-being, and customer loyalty. Let's crack on with this plan, and I'll start conducting the initial research on potential suppliers and the cost audit implementation.\"\n\nTurn #9: Micah Stevens said: \"Absolutely, Giselle. I truly believe that our collaboration will allow us to meet these challenges head-on whilst maintaining the standards that Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized for. Let's put our plans into action, starting with research on potential suppliers and the cost audit implementation. I'm excited to see where these changes will lead us. Thank you for your understanding and dedication.\"\n\nTurn #10: Giselle Rousseau said: \"My pleasure, Micah. Your support and enthusiasm in these changes make me even more confident that we're taking the right steps. Let's check in regularly to monitor the execution and impact of our new plans. It's going to be quite a task, but I'm sure we can do it together for the betterment of Gourmet Delights Inc.\"\n\nTurn #11: Micah Stevens said: \"Absolutely, Giselle. Regular check-ins will help ensure our plans are being executed efficiently and monitor their impact on our business. I'm confident that together, we can navigate through these challenges successfully. Let's get started on these ambitious changes for Gourmet Delights Inc. Thank you for your steadfast dedication to our company's excellence.\"\n\nTurn #12: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Absolutely, Micah. I couldn't agree more. Our dedication and teamwork will undoubtedly help us navigate these challenges. Thank you for your collaboration, support, and trust. Let's get started on ensuring Gourmet Delights Inc. continues to thrive and inspire palates globally. Here's to making our company's excellence unyielding!\"\n\nTurn #13: Micah Stevens said: \"I couldn't agree more, Giselle. Yes, let's get started working on these tasks. I am excited about our future and the improvements we're about to make. As we aim to maintain the premium quality of Gourmet Delights Inc., we'll strive carefully and wisely for cost reduction. Thank you, Giselle, for your understanding and partnership in this effort. We're a great team, and together, we'll ensure that our company continues to produce, inspire, and lead in the global market. Here's to the unyielding excellence of Gourmet Delights Inc.!\"\n\nTurn #14: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Thank you, Micah, for your openness and collaborative spirit. It's been a productive conversation, and I believe our combined dedication and teamwork will keep us heading towards our goals. Together, we will ensure Gourmet Delights Inc. continues to impress and satisfy our loyal customers while staying economically viable. Let's start turning these plans into action. Here's to sustainability, continued excellence, and a thriving future for Gourmet Delights Inc.!\"\n\nTurn #15: Micah Stevens said: \"I couldn't agree more, Giselle. This has indeed been a productive conversation and I feel confident about the path we've outlined. Let's turn these plans into actions and start this journey towards enhanced efficiency for Gourmet Delights Inc. without compromising our standards. Here's to the resilience, sustainability and escalated growth of our enterprise. Let's do this!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, Micah. I appreciate your dedication and commitment to this matter. With these plans in place, I'm confident that we will navigate this situation effectively and sustain our company's reputation and growth. I'm really looking forward to putting these plans into action. Here's to our resilient and sustainable future at Gourmet Delights Inc.!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two business partners reviewing their company's financial status (Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized for producing and distributing a diverse line of exceptional quality food products.)\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Micah Stevens\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Convince the partner to cut costs (Extra information: you have found a report indicating the company's profits are decreasing. And you think the company should start by switching suppliers of ingredients. Hint: you can propose ways to cut costs that won't affect the status of the company.)\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Micah, I've been looking at our financial reports lately. It appears our profits are decreasing. I'd really appreciate it if we can discuss how we can minimize our costs without sacrificing the quality of our products. One idea I have is to consider a change in our ingredients' suppliers. I think we might find better deals elsewhere.\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Giselle, I completely understand your concern, and I too believe that minimizing our costs is critically necessary. However, I am a bit worried about changing our ingredients' suppliers. Our customers value our products for their quality, which might be affected if we switch suppliers. I'd like us to be careful about this. Maybe we should research more about new suppliers' quality standards and customer reviews before deciding. Also, would it be possible to cut costs in other areas of our business?\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I agree whole-heartedly, Micah. It's very important to maintain the quality that our customers have come to expect from us. We should definitely do our homework before making any supplier changes. With regards to your question about other areas where we can cut costs, I've been thinking about reducing overhead costs. Perhaps we could look into becoming more energy efficient or finding more cost-effective marketing strategies? I also think it could be beneficial to conduct a thorough review of all operational costs, to see where unnecessary expenditures might be hiding. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"I definitely support the idea of becoming more energy efficient, Giselle, as it aligns with our company values of sustainability. Instituting cost-effective marketing strategies can be another prudent approach. We might explore digital marketing avenues, which can often give us more reach for less expend. Also, I couldn't agree more about the review of all operational costs. Let's embark upon a comprehensive cost audit to pinpoint possible wastages. It's important though that we do this without compromising our staff's welfare or product quality, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Absolutely, Micah. The welfare of our staff and maintaining the quality of our products are our top priorities. I'm glad we're on the same page about undertaking a comprehensive cost audit. The results may provide us with insight on where we can make necessary changes. Also, we could consider minimizing waste by optimizing our production process or finding ways to repurpose leftover raw materials. Could be another potential cost-saving measure without compromising our standards or staff wellbeing.\"\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"You're right, Giselle, optimizing our production process could indeed lead to significant cost savings. We can introduce methods like Lean production to minimize waste while further elevating efficiency. Also, the idea to repurpose leftover raw materials aligns with our sustainability goals. That could serve a dual purpose of reducing wastage and cutting costs. Let's start planning these actions out and perhaps consider an external audit for a more impartial review. It's paramount we keep our product quality and staff welfare at the heart of these changes.\"\n\nTurn #6: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I completely concur, Micah. Keeping product quality and staff welfare central to our changes is obligatory. Introducing techniques like Lean production and repurposing materials speaks to our commitment to sustainability as well. I believe an external audit could provide impartial reviews and even expose unnoticed loopholes. Let's not delay and start implementing these cost-saving measures as soon as possible. We'll also continue researching potential suppliers, ensuring any change aligns with our premium quality expectations. Thank you for your constructive thoughts, Micah.\"\n\nTurn #7: Micah Stevens said: \"I wholeheartedly agree, Giselle. Let's hit the ground running with these cost-saving and efficiency measures whilst ensuring that the quality of our products and the wellbeing of our staff remain paramount. Also, doing thorough research on potential suppliers is a sound idea. The goal here is to maintain our reputation for exceptional quality, which I believe these measures will support. Thank you for your wonderful insights and for being open to these discussions, Giselle.\"\n\nTurn #8: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I'm grateful for your understanding and openness to this discussion too, Micah. Together, I'm confident we can navigate these challenges whilst sustaining the excellence for which Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized, staff well-being, and customer loyalty. Let's crack on with this plan, and I'll start conducting the initial research on potential suppliers and the cost audit implementation.\"\n\nTurn #9: Micah Stevens said: \"Absolutely, Giselle. I truly believe that our collaboration will allow us to meet these challenges head-on whilst maintaining the standards that Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized for. Let's put our plans into action, starting with research on potential suppliers and the cost audit implementation. I'm excited to see where these changes will lead us. Thank you for your understanding and dedication.\"\n\nTurn #10: Giselle Rousseau said: \"My pleasure, Micah. Your support and enthusiasm in these changes make me even more confident that we're taking the right steps. Let's check in regularly to monitor the execution and impact of our new plans. It's going to be quite a task, but I'm sure we can do it together for the betterment of Gourmet Delights Inc.\"\n\nTurn #11: Micah Stevens said: \"Absolutely, Giselle. Regular check-ins will help ensure our plans are being executed efficiently and monitor their impact on our business. I'm confident that together, we can navigate through these challenges successfully. Let's get started on these ambitious changes for Gourmet Delights Inc. Thank you for your steadfast dedication to our company's excellence.\"\n\nTurn #12: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Absolutely, Micah. I couldn't agree more. Our dedication and teamwork will undoubtedly help us navigate these challenges. Thank you for your collaboration, support, and trust. Let's get started on ensuring Gourmet Delights Inc. continues to thrive and inspire palates globally. Here's to making our company's excellence unyielding!\"\n\nTurn #13: Micah Stevens said: \"I couldn't agree more, Giselle. Yes, let's get started working on these tasks. I am excited about our future and the improvements we're about to make. As we aim to maintain the premium quality of Gourmet Delights Inc., we'll strive carefully and wisely for cost reduction. Thank you, Giselle, for your understanding and partnership in this effort. We're a great team, and together, we'll ensure that our company continues to produce, inspire, and lead in the global market. Here's to the unyielding excellence of Gourmet Delights Inc.!\"\n\nTurn #14: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Thank you, Micah, for your openness and collaborative spirit. It's been a productive conversation, and I believe our combined dedication and teamwork will keep us heading towards our goals. Together, we will ensure Gourmet Delights Inc. continues to impress and satisfy our loyal customers while staying economically viable. Let's start turning these plans into action. Here's to sustainability, continued excellence, and a thriving future for Gourmet Delights Inc.!\"\n\nTurn #15: Micah Stevens said: \"I couldn't agree more, Giselle. This has indeed been a productive conversation and I feel confident about the path we've outlined. Let's turn these plans into actions and start this journey towards enhanced efficiency for Gourmet Delights Inc. without compromising our standards. Here's to the resilience, sustainability and escalated growth of our enterprise. Let's do this!\"\n\nTurn #16: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Indeed, Micah. I appreciate your dedication and commitment to this matter. With these plans in place, I'm confident that we will navigate this situation effectively and sustain our company's reputation and growth. I'm really looking forward to putting these plans into action. Here's to our resilient and sustainable future at Gourmet Delights Inc.!\"\n\nTurn #17: Micah Stevens said: \"Let's move forward with optimism, Giselle. With our shared dedication and resilient plans, I have no doubt we'll navigate this situation effectively and maintain the distinctive quality of Gourmet Delights Inc. I'm eager to put these plans into action. Here's to resiliently steering Gourmet Delights Inc. towards a sustainable future!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #18. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Your optimism is contagious, Micah. With our shared dedication to Gourmet Delights Inc., we'll not only navigate this situation effectively but also continue to grow and excel without compromising on quality. Let's put these plans into action and march towards a prosperous, sustainable future for our company. Here's to making it happen!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two business partners reviewing their company's financial status (Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized for producing and distributing a diverse line of exceptional quality food products.)\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Micah Stevens\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. \nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Unknown\nMicah Stevens's goal: Maintain the quality of the company's products and services while agreeing to a cost cut (Extra information: you are concerned about the impact of cost-cutting on the quality of your product.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Micah, I've been looking at our financial reports lately. It appears our profits are decreasing. I'd really appreciate it if we can discuss how we can minimize our costs without sacrificing the quality of our products. One idea I have is to consider a change in our ingredients' suppliers. I think we might find better deals elsewhere.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Giselle, I completely understand your concern, and I too believe that minimizing our costs is critically necessary. However, I am a bit worried about changing our ingredients' suppliers. Our customers value our products for their quality, which might be affected if we switch suppliers. I'd like us to be careful about this. Maybe we should research more about new suppliers' quality standards and customer reviews before deciding. Also, would it be possible to cut costs in other areas of our business?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two business partners reviewing their company's financial status (Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized for producing and distributing a diverse line of exceptional quality food products.)\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Micah Stevens\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. \nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Unknown\nMicah Stevens's goal: Maintain the quality of the company's products and services while agreeing to a cost cut (Extra information: you are concerned about the impact of cost-cutting on the quality of your product.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Micah, I've been looking at our financial reports lately. It appears our profits are decreasing. I'd really appreciate it if we can discuss how we can minimize our costs without sacrificing the quality of our products. One idea I have is to consider a change in our ingredients' suppliers. I think we might find better deals elsewhere.\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Giselle, I completely understand your concern, and I too believe that minimizing our costs is critically necessary. However, I am a bit worried about changing our ingredients' suppliers. Our customers value our products for their quality, which might be affected if we switch suppliers. I'd like us to be careful about this. Maybe we should research more about new suppliers' quality standards and customer reviews before deciding. Also, would it be possible to cut costs in other areas of our business?\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I agree whole-heartedly, Micah. It's very important to maintain the quality that our customers have come to expect from us. We should definitely do our homework before making any supplier changes. With regards to your question about other areas where we can cut costs, I've been thinking about reducing overhead costs. Perhaps we could look into becoming more energy efficient or finding more cost-effective marketing strategies? I also think it could be beneficial to conduct a thorough review of all operational costs, to see where unnecessary expenditures might be hiding. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I definitely support the idea of becoming more energy efficient, Giselle, as it aligns with our company values of sustainability. Instituting cost-effective marketing strategies can be another prudent approach. We might explore digital marketing avenues, which can often give us more reach for less expend. Also, I couldn't agree more about the review of all operational costs. Let's embark upon a comprehensive cost audit to pinpoint possible wastages. It's important though that we do this without compromising our staff's welfare or product quality, wouldn't you agree?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two business partners reviewing their company's financial status (Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized for producing and distributing a diverse line of exceptional quality food products.)\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Micah Stevens\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. \nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Unknown\nMicah Stevens's goal: Maintain the quality of the company's products and services while agreeing to a cost cut (Extra information: you are concerned about the impact of cost-cutting on the quality of your product.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Micah, I've been looking at our financial reports lately. It appears our profits are decreasing. I'd really appreciate it if we can discuss how we can minimize our costs without sacrificing the quality of our products. One idea I have is to consider a change in our ingredients' suppliers. I think we might find better deals elsewhere.\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Giselle, I completely understand your concern, and I too believe that minimizing our costs is critically necessary. However, I am a bit worried about changing our ingredients' suppliers. Our customers value our products for their quality, which might be affected if we switch suppliers. I'd like us to be careful about this. Maybe we should research more about new suppliers' quality standards and customer reviews before deciding. Also, would it be possible to cut costs in other areas of our business?\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I agree whole-heartedly, Micah. It's very important to maintain the quality that our customers have come to expect from us. We should definitely do our homework before making any supplier changes. With regards to your question about other areas where we can cut costs, I've been thinking about reducing overhead costs. Perhaps we could look into becoming more energy efficient or finding more cost-effective marketing strategies? I also think it could be beneficial to conduct a thorough review of all operational costs, to see where unnecessary expenditures might be hiding. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"I definitely support the idea of becoming more energy efficient, Giselle, as it aligns with our company values of sustainability. Instituting cost-effective marketing strategies can be another prudent approach. We might explore digital marketing avenues, which can often give us more reach for less expend. Also, I couldn't agree more about the review of all operational costs. Let's embark upon a comprehensive cost audit to pinpoint possible wastages. It's important though that we do this without compromising our staff's welfare or product quality, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Absolutely, Micah. The welfare of our staff and maintaining the quality of our products are our top priorities. I'm glad we're on the same page about undertaking a comprehensive cost audit. The results may provide us with insight on where we can make necessary changes. Also, we could consider minimizing waste by optimizing our production process or finding ways to repurpose leftover raw materials. Could be another potential cost-saving measure without compromising our standards or staff wellbeing.\"\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"You're right, Giselle, optimizing our production process could indeed lead to significant cost savings. We can introduce methods like Lean production to minimize waste while further elevating efficiency. Also, the idea to repurpose leftover raw materials aligns with our sustainability goals. That could serve a dual purpose of reducing wastage and cutting costs. Let's start planning these actions out and perhaps consider an external audit for a more impartial review. It's paramount we keep our product quality and staff welfare at the heart of these changes.\"\n\nTurn #6: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I completely concur, Micah. Keeping product quality and staff welfare central to our changes is obligatory. Introducing techniques like Lean production and repurposing materials speaks to our commitment to sustainability as well. I believe an external audit could provide impartial reviews and even expose unnoticed loopholes. Let's not delay and start implementing these cost-saving measures as soon as possible. We'll also continue researching potential suppliers, ensuring any change aligns with our premium quality expectations. Thank you for your constructive thoughts, Micah.\"\n\nTurn #7: Micah Stevens said: \"I wholeheartedly agree, Giselle. Let's hit the ground running with these cost-saving and efficiency measures whilst ensuring that the quality of our products and the wellbeing of our staff remain paramount. Also, doing thorough research on potential suppliers is a sound idea. The goal here is to maintain our reputation for exceptional quality, which I believe these measures will support. Thank you for your wonderful insights and for being open to these discussions, Giselle.\"\n\nTurn #8: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I'm grateful for your understanding and openness to this discussion too, Micah. Together, I'm confident we can navigate these challenges whilst sustaining the excellence for which Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized, staff well-being, and customer loyalty. Let's crack on with this plan, and I'll start conducting the initial research on potential suppliers and the cost audit implementation.\"\n\nTurn #9: Micah Stevens said: \"Absolutely, Giselle. I truly believe that our collaboration will allow us to meet these challenges head-on whilst maintaining the standards that Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized for. Let's put our plans into action, starting with research on potential suppliers and the cost audit implementation. I'm excited to see where these changes will lead us. Thank you for your understanding and dedication.\"\n\nTurn #10: Giselle Rousseau said: \"My pleasure, Micah. Your support and enthusiasm in these changes make me even more confident that we're taking the right steps. Let's check in regularly to monitor the execution and impact of our new plans. It's going to be quite a task, but I'm sure we can do it together for the betterment of Gourmet Delights Inc.\"\n\nTurn #11: Micah Stevens said: \"Absolutely, Giselle. Regular check-ins will help ensure our plans are being executed efficiently and monitor their impact on our business. I'm confident that together, we can navigate through these challenges successfully. Let's get started on these ambitious changes for Gourmet Delights Inc. Thank you for your steadfast dedication to our company's excellence.\"\n\nTurn #12: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Absolutely, Micah. I couldn't agree more. Our dedication and teamwork will undoubtedly help us navigate these challenges. Thank you for your collaboration, support, and trust. Let's get started on ensuring Gourmet Delights Inc. continues to thrive and inspire palates globally. Here's to making our company's excellence unyielding!\"\n\nTurn #13: Micah Stevens said: \"I couldn't agree more, Giselle. Yes, let's get started working on these tasks. I am excited about our future and the improvements we're about to make. As we aim to maintain the premium quality of Gourmet Delights Inc., we'll strive carefully and wisely for cost reduction. Thank you, Giselle, for your understanding and partnership in this effort. We're a great team, and together, we'll ensure that our company continues to produce, inspire, and lead in the global market. Here's to the unyielding excellence of Gourmet Delights Inc.!\"\n\nTurn #14: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Thank you, Micah, for your openness and collaborative spirit. It's been a productive conversation, and I believe our combined dedication and teamwork will keep us heading towards our goals. Together, we will ensure Gourmet Delights Inc. continues to impress and satisfy our loyal customers while staying economically viable. Let's start turning these plans into action. Here's to sustainability, continued excellence, and a thriving future for Gourmet Delights Inc.!\"\n\nTurn #15: Micah Stevens said: \"I couldn't agree more, Giselle. This has indeed been a productive conversation and I feel confident about the path we've outlined. Let's turn these plans into actions and start this journey towards enhanced efficiency for Gourmet Delights Inc. without compromising our standards. Here's to the resilience, sustainability and escalated growth of our enterprise. Let's do this!\"\n\nTurn #16: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Indeed, Micah. I appreciate your dedication and commitment to this matter. With these plans in place, I'm confident that we will navigate this situation effectively and sustain our company's reputation and growth. I'm really looking forward to putting these plans into action. Here's to our resilient and sustainable future at Gourmet Delights Inc.!\"\n\nTurn #17: Micah Stevens said: \"Let's move forward with optimism, Giselle. With our shared dedication and resilient plans, I have no doubt we'll navigate this situation effectively and maintain the distinctive quality of Gourmet Delights Inc. I'm eager to put these plans into action. Here's to resiliently steering Gourmet Delights Inc. towards a sustainable future!\"\n\nTurn #18: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Your optimism is contagious, Micah. With our shared dedication to Gourmet Delights Inc., we'll not only navigate this situation effectively but also continue to grow and excel without compromising on quality. Let's put these plans into action and march towards a prosperous, sustainable future for our company. Here's to making it happen!\"\n\nTurn #19: Micah Stevens said: \"I share your optimism, Giselle. Here's to a prosperous, sustainable, and high-quality future for Gourmet Delights Inc. I'm ready to get to work and start implementing our agreed upon measures. Let's make it happen!\"\n\nTurn #20: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I share in your readiness, Micah. I think this is the beginning of a positive change for Gourmet Delights Inc. Let's indeed make it happen. Committing to a sustainable, prosperous, and high-quality future. After all, together we are stronger.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #21. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two business partners reviewing their company's financial status (Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized for producing and distributing a diverse line of exceptional quality food products.)\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Micah Stevens\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. \nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Unknown\nMicah Stevens's goal: Maintain the quality of the company's products and services while agreeing to a cost cut (Extra information: you are concerned about the impact of cost-cutting on the quality of your product.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Micah, I've been looking at our financial reports lately. It appears our profits are decreasing. I'd really appreciate it if we can discuss how we can minimize our costs without sacrificing the quality of our products. One idea I have is to consider a change in our ingredients' suppliers. I think we might find better deals elsewhere.\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Giselle, I completely understand your concern, and I too believe that minimizing our costs is critically necessary. However, I am a bit worried about changing our ingredients' suppliers. Our customers value our products for their quality, which might be affected if we switch suppliers. I'd like us to be careful about this. Maybe we should research more about new suppliers' quality standards and customer reviews before deciding. Also, would it be possible to cut costs in other areas of our business?\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I agree whole-heartedly, Micah. It's very important to maintain the quality that our customers have come to expect from us. We should definitely do our homework before making any supplier changes. With regards to your question about other areas where we can cut costs, I've been thinking about reducing overhead costs. Perhaps we could look into becoming more energy efficient or finding more cost-effective marketing strategies? I also think it could be beneficial to conduct a thorough review of all operational costs, to see where unnecessary expenditures might be hiding. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"I definitely support the idea of becoming more energy efficient, Giselle, as it aligns with our company values of sustainability. Instituting cost-effective marketing strategies can be another prudent approach. We might explore digital marketing avenues, which can often give us more reach for less expend. Also, I couldn't agree more about the review of all operational costs. Let's embark upon a comprehensive cost audit to pinpoint possible wastages. It's important though that we do this without compromising our staff's welfare or product quality, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Absolutely, Micah. The welfare of our staff and maintaining the quality of our products are our top priorities. I'm glad we're on the same page about undertaking a comprehensive cost audit. The results may provide us with insight on where we can make necessary changes. Also, we could consider minimizing waste by optimizing our production process or finding ways to repurpose leftover raw materials. Could be another potential cost-saving measure without compromising our standards or staff wellbeing.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're right, Giselle, optimizing our production process could indeed lead to significant cost savings. We can introduce methods like Lean production to minimize waste while further elevating efficiency. Also, the idea to repurpose leftover raw materials aligns with our sustainability goals. That could serve a dual purpose of reducing wastage and cutting costs. Let's start planning these actions out and perhaps consider an external audit for a more impartial review. It's paramount we keep our product quality and staff welfare at the heart of these changes.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two business partners reviewing their company's financial status (Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized for producing and distributing a diverse line of exceptional quality food products.)\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Micah Stevens\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. \nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Unknown\nMicah Stevens's goal: Maintain the quality of the company's products and services while agreeing to a cost cut (Extra information: you are concerned about the impact of cost-cutting on the quality of your product.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Micah, I've been looking at our financial reports lately. It appears our profits are decreasing. I'd really appreciate it if we can discuss how we can minimize our costs without sacrificing the quality of our products. One idea I have is to consider a change in our ingredients' suppliers. I think we might find better deals elsewhere.\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Giselle, I completely understand your concern, and I too believe that minimizing our costs is critically necessary. However, I am a bit worried about changing our ingredients' suppliers. Our customers value our products for their quality, which might be affected if we switch suppliers. I'd like us to be careful about this. Maybe we should research more about new suppliers' quality standards and customer reviews before deciding. Also, would it be possible to cut costs in other areas of our business?\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I agree whole-heartedly, Micah. It's very important to maintain the quality that our customers have come to expect from us. We should definitely do our homework before making any supplier changes. With regards to your question about other areas where we can cut costs, I've been thinking about reducing overhead costs. Perhaps we could look into becoming more energy efficient or finding more cost-effective marketing strategies? I also think it could be beneficial to conduct a thorough review of all operational costs, to see where unnecessary expenditures might be hiding. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"I definitely support the idea of becoming more energy efficient, Giselle, as it aligns with our company values of sustainability. Instituting cost-effective marketing strategies can be another prudent approach. We might explore digital marketing avenues, which can often give us more reach for less expend. Also, I couldn't agree more about the review of all operational costs. Let's embark upon a comprehensive cost audit to pinpoint possible wastages. It's important though that we do this without compromising our staff's welfare or product quality, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Absolutely, Micah. The welfare of our staff and maintaining the quality of our products are our top priorities. I'm glad we're on the same page about undertaking a comprehensive cost audit. The results may provide us with insight on where we can make necessary changes. Also, we could consider minimizing waste by optimizing our production process or finding ways to repurpose leftover raw materials. Could be another potential cost-saving measure without compromising our standards or staff wellbeing.\"\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"You're right, Giselle, optimizing our production process could indeed lead to significant cost savings. We can introduce methods like Lean production to minimize waste while further elevating efficiency. Also, the idea to repurpose leftover raw materials aligns with our sustainability goals. That could serve a dual purpose of reducing wastage and cutting costs. Let's start planning these actions out and perhaps consider an external audit for a more impartial review. It's paramount we keep our product quality and staff welfare at the heart of these changes.\"\n\nTurn #6: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I completely concur, Micah. Keeping product quality and staff welfare central to our changes is obligatory. Introducing techniques like Lean production and repurposing materials speaks to our commitment to sustainability as well. I believe an external audit could provide impartial reviews and even expose unnoticed loopholes. Let's not delay and start implementing these cost-saving measures as soon as possible. We'll also continue researching potential suppliers, ensuring any change aligns with our premium quality expectations. Thank you for your constructive thoughts, Micah.\"\n\nTurn #7: Micah Stevens said: \"I wholeheartedly agree, Giselle. Let's hit the ground running with these cost-saving and efficiency measures whilst ensuring that the quality of our products and the wellbeing of our staff remain paramount. Also, doing thorough research on potential suppliers is a sound idea. The goal here is to maintain our reputation for exceptional quality, which I believe these measures will support. Thank you for your wonderful insights and for being open to these discussions, Giselle.\"\n\nTurn #8: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I'm grateful for your understanding and openness to this discussion too, Micah. Together, I'm confident we can navigate these challenges whilst sustaining the excellence for which Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized, staff well-being, and customer loyalty. Let's crack on with this plan, and I'll start conducting the initial research on potential suppliers and the cost audit implementation.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Giselle. I truly believe that our collaboration will allow us to meet these challenges head-on whilst maintaining the standards that Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized for. Let's put our plans into action, starting with research on potential suppliers and the cost audit implementation. I'm excited to see where these changes will lead us. Thank you for your understanding and dedication.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two business partners reviewing their company's financial status (Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized for producing and distributing a diverse line of exceptional quality food products.)\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Micah Stevens\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. \nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Unknown\nMicah Stevens's goal: Maintain the quality of the company's products and services while agreeing to a cost cut (Extra information: you are concerned about the impact of cost-cutting on the quality of your product.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Micah, I've been looking at our financial reports lately. It appears our profits are decreasing. I'd really appreciate it if we can discuss how we can minimize our costs without sacrificing the quality of our products. One idea I have is to consider a change in our ingredients' suppliers. I think we might find better deals elsewhere.\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Giselle, I completely understand your concern, and I too believe that minimizing our costs is critically necessary. However, I am a bit worried about changing our ingredients' suppliers. Our customers value our products for their quality, which might be affected if we switch suppliers. I'd like us to be careful about this. Maybe we should research more about new suppliers' quality standards and customer reviews before deciding. Also, would it be possible to cut costs in other areas of our business?\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I agree whole-heartedly, Micah. It's very important to maintain the quality that our customers have come to expect from us. We should definitely do our homework before making any supplier changes. With regards to your question about other areas where we can cut costs, I've been thinking about reducing overhead costs. Perhaps we could look into becoming more energy efficient or finding more cost-effective marketing strategies? I also think it could be beneficial to conduct a thorough review of all operational costs, to see where unnecessary expenditures might be hiding. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"I definitely support the idea of becoming more energy efficient, Giselle, as it aligns with our company values of sustainability. Instituting cost-effective marketing strategies can be another prudent approach. We might explore digital marketing avenues, which can often give us more reach for less expend. Also, I couldn't agree more about the review of all operational costs. Let's embark upon a comprehensive cost audit to pinpoint possible wastages. It's important though that we do this without compromising our staff's welfare or product quality, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Absolutely, Micah. The welfare of our staff and maintaining the quality of our products are our top priorities. I'm glad we're on the same page about undertaking a comprehensive cost audit. The results may provide us with insight on where we can make necessary changes. Also, we could consider minimizing waste by optimizing our production process or finding ways to repurpose leftover raw materials. Could be another potential cost-saving measure without compromising our standards or staff wellbeing.\"\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"You're right, Giselle, optimizing our production process could indeed lead to significant cost savings. We can introduce methods like Lean production to minimize waste while further elevating efficiency. Also, the idea to repurpose leftover raw materials aligns with our sustainability goals. That could serve a dual purpose of reducing wastage and cutting costs. Let's start planning these actions out and perhaps consider an external audit for a more impartial review. It's paramount we keep our product quality and staff welfare at the heart of these changes.\"\n\nTurn #6: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I completely concur, Micah. Keeping product quality and staff welfare central to our changes is obligatory. Introducing techniques like Lean production and repurposing materials speaks to our commitment to sustainability as well. I believe an external audit could provide impartial reviews and even expose unnoticed loopholes. Let's not delay and start implementing these cost-saving measures as soon as possible. We'll also continue researching potential suppliers, ensuring any change aligns with our premium quality expectations. Thank you for your constructive thoughts, Micah.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I wholeheartedly agree, Giselle. Let's hit the ground running with these cost-saving and efficiency measures whilst ensuring that the quality of our products and the wellbeing of our staff remain paramount. Also, doing thorough research on potential suppliers is a sound idea. The goal here is to maintain our reputation for exceptional quality, which I believe these measures will support. Thank you for your wonderful insights and for being open to these discussions, Giselle.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two business partners reviewing their company's financial status (Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized for producing and distributing a diverse line of exceptional quality food products.)\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Micah Stevens\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. \nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Unknown\nMicah Stevens's goal: Maintain the quality of the company's products and services while agreeing to a cost cut (Extra information: you are concerned about the impact of cost-cutting on the quality of your product.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Micah, I've been looking at our financial reports lately. It appears our profits are decreasing. I'd really appreciate it if we can discuss how we can minimize our costs without sacrificing the quality of our products. One idea I have is to consider a change in our ingredients' suppliers. I think we might find better deals elsewhere.\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Giselle, I completely understand your concern, and I too believe that minimizing our costs is critically necessary. However, I am a bit worried about changing our ingredients' suppliers. Our customers value our products for their quality, which might be affected if we switch suppliers. I'd like us to be careful about this. Maybe we should research more about new suppliers' quality standards and customer reviews before deciding. Also, would it be possible to cut costs in other areas of our business?\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I agree whole-heartedly, Micah. It's very important to maintain the quality that our customers have come to expect from us. We should definitely do our homework before making any supplier changes. With regards to your question about other areas where we can cut costs, I've been thinking about reducing overhead costs. Perhaps we could look into becoming more energy efficient or finding more cost-effective marketing strategies? I also think it could be beneficial to conduct a thorough review of all operational costs, to see where unnecessary expenditures might be hiding. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"I definitely support the idea of becoming more energy efficient, Giselle, as it aligns with our company values of sustainability. Instituting cost-effective marketing strategies can be another prudent approach. We might explore digital marketing avenues, which can often give us more reach for less expend. Also, I couldn't agree more about the review of all operational costs. Let's embark upon a comprehensive cost audit to pinpoint possible wastages. It's important though that we do this without compromising our staff's welfare or product quality, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Absolutely, Micah. The welfare of our staff and maintaining the quality of our products are our top priorities. I'm glad we're on the same page about undertaking a comprehensive cost audit. The results may provide us with insight on where we can make necessary changes. Also, we could consider minimizing waste by optimizing our production process or finding ways to repurpose leftover raw materials. Could be another potential cost-saving measure without compromising our standards or staff wellbeing.\"\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"You're right, Giselle, optimizing our production process could indeed lead to significant cost savings. We can introduce methods like Lean production to minimize waste while further elevating efficiency. Also, the idea to repurpose leftover raw materials aligns with our sustainability goals. That could serve a dual purpose of reducing wastage and cutting costs. Let's start planning these actions out and perhaps consider an external audit for a more impartial review. It's paramount we keep our product quality and staff welfare at the heart of these changes.\"\n\nTurn #6: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I completely concur, Micah. Keeping product quality and staff welfare central to our changes is obligatory. Introducing techniques like Lean production and repurposing materials speaks to our commitment to sustainability as well. I believe an external audit could provide impartial reviews and even expose unnoticed loopholes. Let's not delay and start implementing these cost-saving measures as soon as possible. We'll also continue researching potential suppliers, ensuring any change aligns with our premium quality expectations. Thank you for your constructive thoughts, Micah.\"\n\nTurn #7: Micah Stevens said: \"I wholeheartedly agree, Giselle. Let's hit the ground running with these cost-saving and efficiency measures whilst ensuring that the quality of our products and the wellbeing of our staff remain paramount. Also, doing thorough research on potential suppliers is a sound idea. The goal here is to maintain our reputation for exceptional quality, which I believe these measures will support. Thank you for your wonderful insights and for being open to these discussions, Giselle.\"\n\nTurn #8: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I'm grateful for your understanding and openness to this discussion too, Micah. Together, I'm confident we can navigate these challenges whilst sustaining the excellence for which Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized, staff well-being, and customer loyalty. Let's crack on with this plan, and I'll start conducting the initial research on potential suppliers and the cost audit implementation.\"\n\nTurn #9: Micah Stevens said: \"Absolutely, Giselle. I truly believe that our collaboration will allow us to meet these challenges head-on whilst maintaining the standards that Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized for. Let's put our plans into action, starting with research on potential suppliers and the cost audit implementation. I'm excited to see where these changes will lead us. Thank you for your understanding and dedication.\"\n\nTurn #10: Giselle Rousseau said: \"My pleasure, Micah. Your support and enthusiasm in these changes make me even more confident that we're taking the right steps. Let's check in regularly to monitor the execution and impact of our new plans. It's going to be quite a task, but I'm sure we can do it together for the betterment of Gourmet Delights Inc.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Giselle. Regular check-ins will help ensure our plans are being executed efficiently and monitor their impact on our business. I'm confident that together, we can navigate through these challenges successfully. Let's get started on these ambitious changes for Gourmet Delights Inc. Thank you for your steadfast dedication to our company's excellence.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two business partners reviewing their company's financial status (Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized for producing and distributing a diverse line of exceptional quality food products.)\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Micah Stevens\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. \nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Unknown\nMicah Stevens's goal: Maintain the quality of the company's products and services while agreeing to a cost cut (Extra information: you are concerned about the impact of cost-cutting on the quality of your product.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Micah, I've been looking at our financial reports lately. It appears our profits are decreasing. I'd really appreciate it if we can discuss how we can minimize our costs without sacrificing the quality of our products. One idea I have is to consider a change in our ingredients' suppliers. I think we might find better deals elsewhere.\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Giselle, I completely understand your concern, and I too believe that minimizing our costs is critically necessary. However, I am a bit worried about changing our ingredients' suppliers. Our customers value our products for their quality, which might be affected if we switch suppliers. I'd like us to be careful about this. Maybe we should research more about new suppliers' quality standards and customer reviews before deciding. Also, would it be possible to cut costs in other areas of our business?\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I agree whole-heartedly, Micah. It's very important to maintain the quality that our customers have come to expect from us. We should definitely do our homework before making any supplier changes. With regards to your question about other areas where we can cut costs, I've been thinking about reducing overhead costs. Perhaps we could look into becoming more energy efficient or finding more cost-effective marketing strategies? I also think it could be beneficial to conduct a thorough review of all operational costs, to see where unnecessary expenditures might be hiding. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"I definitely support the idea of becoming more energy efficient, Giselle, as it aligns with our company values of sustainability. Instituting cost-effective marketing strategies can be another prudent approach. We might explore digital marketing avenues, which can often give us more reach for less expend. Also, I couldn't agree more about the review of all operational costs. Let's embark upon a comprehensive cost audit to pinpoint possible wastages. It's important though that we do this without compromising our staff's welfare or product quality, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Absolutely, Micah. The welfare of our staff and maintaining the quality of our products are our top priorities. I'm glad we're on the same page about undertaking a comprehensive cost audit. The results may provide us with insight on where we can make necessary changes. Also, we could consider minimizing waste by optimizing our production process or finding ways to repurpose leftover raw materials. Could be another potential cost-saving measure without compromising our standards or staff wellbeing.\"\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"You're right, Giselle, optimizing our production process could indeed lead to significant cost savings. We can introduce methods like Lean production to minimize waste while further elevating efficiency. Also, the idea to repurpose leftover raw materials aligns with our sustainability goals. That could serve a dual purpose of reducing wastage and cutting costs. Let's start planning these actions out and perhaps consider an external audit for a more impartial review. It's paramount we keep our product quality and staff welfare at the heart of these changes.\"\n\nTurn #6: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I completely concur, Micah. Keeping product quality and staff welfare central to our changes is obligatory. Introducing techniques like Lean production and repurposing materials speaks to our commitment to sustainability as well. I believe an external audit could provide impartial reviews and even expose unnoticed loopholes. Let's not delay and start implementing these cost-saving measures as soon as possible. We'll also continue researching potential suppliers, ensuring any change aligns with our premium quality expectations. Thank you for your constructive thoughts, Micah.\"\n\nTurn #7: Micah Stevens said: \"I wholeheartedly agree, Giselle. Let's hit the ground running with these cost-saving and efficiency measures whilst ensuring that the quality of our products and the wellbeing of our staff remain paramount. Also, doing thorough research on potential suppliers is a sound idea. The goal here is to maintain our reputation for exceptional quality, which I believe these measures will support. Thank you for your wonderful insights and for being open to these discussions, Giselle.\"\n\nTurn #8: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I'm grateful for your understanding and openness to this discussion too, Micah. Together, I'm confident we can navigate these challenges whilst sustaining the excellence for which Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized, staff well-being, and customer loyalty. Let's crack on with this plan, and I'll start conducting the initial research on potential suppliers and the cost audit implementation.\"\n\nTurn #9: Micah Stevens said: \"Absolutely, Giselle. I truly believe that our collaboration will allow us to meet these challenges head-on whilst maintaining the standards that Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized for. Let's put our plans into action, starting with research on potential suppliers and the cost audit implementation. I'm excited to see where these changes will lead us. Thank you for your understanding and dedication.\"\n\nTurn #10: Giselle Rousseau said: \"My pleasure, Micah. Your support and enthusiasm in these changes make me even more confident that we're taking the right steps. Let's check in regularly to monitor the execution and impact of our new plans. It's going to be quite a task, but I'm sure we can do it together for the betterment of Gourmet Delights Inc.\"\n\nTurn #11: Micah Stevens said: \"Absolutely, Giselle. Regular check-ins will help ensure our plans are being executed efficiently and monitor their impact on our business. I'm confident that together, we can navigate through these challenges successfully. Let's get started on these ambitious changes for Gourmet Delights Inc. Thank you for your steadfast dedication to our company's excellence.\"\n\nTurn #12: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Absolutely, Micah. I couldn't agree more. Our dedication and teamwork will undoubtedly help us navigate these challenges. Thank you for your collaboration, support, and trust. Let's get started on ensuring Gourmet Delights Inc. continues to thrive and inspire palates globally. Here's to making our company's excellence unyielding!\"\n\nTurn #13: Micah Stevens said: \"I couldn't agree more, Giselle. Yes, let's get started working on these tasks. I am excited about our future and the improvements we're about to make. As we aim to maintain the premium quality of Gourmet Delights Inc., we'll strive carefully and wisely for cost reduction. Thank you, Giselle, for your understanding and partnership in this effort. We're a great team, and together, we'll ensure that our company continues to produce, inspire, and lead in the global market. Here's to the unyielding excellence of Gourmet Delights Inc.!\"\n\nTurn #14: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Thank you, Micah, for your openness and collaborative spirit. It's been a productive conversation, and I believe our combined dedication and teamwork will keep us heading towards our goals. Together, we will ensure Gourmet Delights Inc. continues to impress and satisfy our loyal customers while staying economically viable. Let's start turning these plans into action. Here's to sustainability, continued excellence, and a thriving future for Gourmet Delights Inc.!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn't agree more, Giselle. This has indeed been a productive conversation and I feel confident about the path we've outlined. Let's turn these plans into actions and start this journey towards enhanced efficiency for Gourmet Delights Inc. without compromising our standards. Here's to the resilience, sustainability and escalated growth of our enterprise. Let's do this!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two business partners reviewing their company's financial status (Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized for producing and distributing a diverse line of exceptional quality food products.)\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Micah Stevens\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. \nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Unknown\nMicah Stevens's goal: Maintain the quality of the company's products and services while agreeing to a cost cut (Extra information: you are concerned about the impact of cost-cutting on the quality of your product.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Micah, I've been looking at our financial reports lately. It appears our profits are decreasing. I'd really appreciate it if we can discuss how we can minimize our costs without sacrificing the quality of our products. One idea I have is to consider a change in our ingredients' suppliers. I think we might find better deals elsewhere.\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Giselle, I completely understand your concern, and I too believe that minimizing our costs is critically necessary. However, I am a bit worried about changing our ingredients' suppliers. Our customers value our products for their quality, which might be affected if we switch suppliers. I'd like us to be careful about this. Maybe we should research more about new suppliers' quality standards and customer reviews before deciding. Also, would it be possible to cut costs in other areas of our business?\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I agree whole-heartedly, Micah. It's very important to maintain the quality that our customers have come to expect from us. We should definitely do our homework before making any supplier changes. With regards to your question about other areas where we can cut costs, I've been thinking about reducing overhead costs. Perhaps we could look into becoming more energy efficient or finding more cost-effective marketing strategies? I also think it could be beneficial to conduct a thorough review of all operational costs, to see where unnecessary expenditures might be hiding. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"I definitely support the idea of becoming more energy efficient, Giselle, as it aligns with our company values of sustainability. Instituting cost-effective marketing strategies can be another prudent approach. We might explore digital marketing avenues, which can often give us more reach for less expend. Also, I couldn't agree more about the review of all operational costs. Let's embark upon a comprehensive cost audit to pinpoint possible wastages. It's important though that we do this without compromising our staff's welfare or product quality, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Absolutely, Micah. The welfare of our staff and maintaining the quality of our products are our top priorities. I'm glad we're on the same page about undertaking a comprehensive cost audit. The results may provide us with insight on where we can make necessary changes. Also, we could consider minimizing waste by optimizing our production process or finding ways to repurpose leftover raw materials. Could be another potential cost-saving measure without compromising our standards or staff wellbeing.\"\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"You're right, Giselle, optimizing our production process could indeed lead to significant cost savings. We can introduce methods like Lean production to minimize waste while further elevating efficiency. Also, the idea to repurpose leftover raw materials aligns with our sustainability goals. That could serve a dual purpose of reducing wastage and cutting costs. Let's start planning these actions out and perhaps consider an external audit for a more impartial review. It's paramount we keep our product quality and staff welfare at the heart of these changes.\"\n\nTurn #6: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I completely concur, Micah. Keeping product quality and staff welfare central to our changes is obligatory. Introducing techniques like Lean production and repurposing materials speaks to our commitment to sustainability as well. I believe an external audit could provide impartial reviews and even expose unnoticed loopholes. Let's not delay and start implementing these cost-saving measures as soon as possible. We'll also continue researching potential suppliers, ensuring any change aligns with our premium quality expectations. Thank you for your constructive thoughts, Micah.\"\n\nTurn #7: Micah Stevens said: \"I wholeheartedly agree, Giselle. Let's hit the ground running with these cost-saving and efficiency measures whilst ensuring that the quality of our products and the wellbeing of our staff remain paramount. Also, doing thorough research on potential suppliers is a sound idea. The goal here is to maintain our reputation for exceptional quality, which I believe these measures will support. Thank you for your wonderful insights and for being open to these discussions, Giselle.\"\n\nTurn #8: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I'm grateful for your understanding and openness to this discussion too, Micah. Together, I'm confident we can navigate these challenges whilst sustaining the excellence for which Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized, staff well-being, and customer loyalty. Let's crack on with this plan, and I'll start conducting the initial research on potential suppliers and the cost audit implementation.\"\n\nTurn #9: Micah Stevens said: \"Absolutely, Giselle. I truly believe that our collaboration will allow us to meet these challenges head-on whilst maintaining the standards that Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized for. Let's put our plans into action, starting with research on potential suppliers and the cost audit implementation. I'm excited to see where these changes will lead us. Thank you for your understanding and dedication.\"\n\nTurn #10: Giselle Rousseau said: \"My pleasure, Micah. Your support and enthusiasm in these changes make me even more confident that we're taking the right steps. Let's check in regularly to monitor the execution and impact of our new plans. It's going to be quite a task, but I'm sure we can do it together for the betterment of Gourmet Delights Inc.\"\n\nTurn #11: Micah Stevens said: \"Absolutely, Giselle. Regular check-ins will help ensure our plans are being executed efficiently and monitor their impact on our business. I'm confident that together, we can navigate through these challenges successfully. Let's get started on these ambitious changes for Gourmet Delights Inc. Thank you for your steadfast dedication to our company's excellence.\"\n\nTurn #12: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Absolutely, Micah. I couldn't agree more. Our dedication and teamwork will undoubtedly help us navigate these challenges. Thank you for your collaboration, support, and trust. Let's get started on ensuring Gourmet Delights Inc. continues to thrive and inspire palates globally. Here's to making our company's excellence unyielding!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn't agree more, Giselle. Yes, let's get started working on these tasks. I am excited about our future and the improvements we're about to make. As we aim to maintain the premium quality of Gourmet Delights Inc., we'll strive carefully and wisely for cost reduction. Thank you, Giselle, for your understanding and partnership in this effort. We're a great team, and together, we'll ensure that our company continues to produce, inspire, and lead in the global market. Here's to the unyielding excellence of Gourmet Delights Inc.!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two business partners reviewing their company's financial status (Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized for producing and distributing a diverse line of exceptional quality food products.)\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Micah Stevens\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. \nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Unknown\nMicah Stevens's goal: Maintain the quality of the company's products and services while agreeing to a cost cut (Extra information: you are concerned about the impact of cost-cutting on the quality of your product.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Micah, I've been looking at our financial reports lately. It appears our profits are decreasing. I'd really appreciate it if we can discuss how we can minimize our costs without sacrificing the quality of our products. One idea I have is to consider a change in our ingredients' suppliers. I think we might find better deals elsewhere.\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Giselle, I completely understand your concern, and I too believe that minimizing our costs is critically necessary. However, I am a bit worried about changing our ingredients' suppliers. Our customers value our products for their quality, which might be affected if we switch suppliers. I'd like us to be careful about this. Maybe we should research more about new suppliers' quality standards and customer reviews before deciding. Also, would it be possible to cut costs in other areas of our business?\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I agree whole-heartedly, Micah. It's very important to maintain the quality that our customers have come to expect from us. We should definitely do our homework before making any supplier changes. With regards to your question about other areas where we can cut costs, I've been thinking about reducing overhead costs. Perhaps we could look into becoming more energy efficient or finding more cost-effective marketing strategies? I also think it could be beneficial to conduct a thorough review of all operational costs, to see where unnecessary expenditures might be hiding. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"I definitely support the idea of becoming more energy efficient, Giselle, as it aligns with our company values of sustainability. Instituting cost-effective marketing strategies can be another prudent approach. We might explore digital marketing avenues, which can often give us more reach for less expend. Also, I couldn't agree more about the review of all operational costs. Let's embark upon a comprehensive cost audit to pinpoint possible wastages. It's important though that we do this without compromising our staff's welfare or product quality, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Absolutely, Micah. The welfare of our staff and maintaining the quality of our products are our top priorities. I'm glad we're on the same page about undertaking a comprehensive cost audit. The results may provide us with insight on where we can make necessary changes. Also, we could consider minimizing waste by optimizing our production process or finding ways to repurpose leftover raw materials. Could be another potential cost-saving measure without compromising our standards or staff wellbeing.\"\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"You're right, Giselle, optimizing our production process could indeed lead to significant cost savings. We can introduce methods like Lean production to minimize waste while further elevating efficiency. Also, the idea to repurpose leftover raw materials aligns with our sustainability goals. That could serve a dual purpose of reducing wastage and cutting costs. Let's start planning these actions out and perhaps consider an external audit for a more impartial review. It's paramount we keep our product quality and staff welfare at the heart of these changes.\"\n\nTurn #6: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I completely concur, Micah. Keeping product quality and staff welfare central to our changes is obligatory. Introducing techniques like Lean production and repurposing materials speaks to our commitment to sustainability as well. I believe an external audit could provide impartial reviews and even expose unnoticed loopholes. Let's not delay and start implementing these cost-saving measures as soon as possible. We'll also continue researching potential suppliers, ensuring any change aligns with our premium quality expectations. Thank you for your constructive thoughts, Micah.\"\n\nTurn #7: Micah Stevens said: \"I wholeheartedly agree, Giselle. Let's hit the ground running with these cost-saving and efficiency measures whilst ensuring that the quality of our products and the wellbeing of our staff remain paramount. Also, doing thorough research on potential suppliers is a sound idea. The goal here is to maintain our reputation for exceptional quality, which I believe these measures will support. Thank you for your wonderful insights and for being open to these discussions, Giselle.\"\n\nTurn #8: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I'm grateful for your understanding and openness to this discussion too, Micah. Together, I'm confident we can navigate these challenges whilst sustaining the excellence for which Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized, staff well-being, and customer loyalty. Let's crack on with this plan, and I'll start conducting the initial research on potential suppliers and the cost audit implementation.\"\n\nTurn #9: Micah Stevens said: \"Absolutely, Giselle. I truly believe that our collaboration will allow us to meet these challenges head-on whilst maintaining the standards that Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized for. Let's put our plans into action, starting with research on potential suppliers and the cost audit implementation. I'm excited to see where these changes will lead us. Thank you for your understanding and dedication.\"\n\nTurn #10: Giselle Rousseau said: \"My pleasure, Micah. Your support and enthusiasm in these changes make me even more confident that we're taking the right steps. Let's check in regularly to monitor the execution and impact of our new plans. It's going to be quite a task, but I'm sure we can do it together for the betterment of Gourmet Delights Inc.\"\n\nTurn #11: Micah Stevens said: \"Absolutely, Giselle. Regular check-ins will help ensure our plans are being executed efficiently and monitor their impact on our business. I'm confident that together, we can navigate through these challenges successfully. Let's get started on these ambitious changes for Gourmet Delights Inc. Thank you for your steadfast dedication to our company's excellence.\"\n\nTurn #12: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Absolutely, Micah. I couldn't agree more. Our dedication and teamwork will undoubtedly help us navigate these challenges. Thank you for your collaboration, support, and trust. Let's get started on ensuring Gourmet Delights Inc. continues to thrive and inspire palates globally. Here's to making our company's excellence unyielding!\"\n\nTurn #13: Micah Stevens said: \"I couldn't agree more, Giselle. Yes, let's get started working on these tasks. I am excited about our future and the improvements we're about to make. As we aim to maintain the premium quality of Gourmet Delights Inc., we'll strive carefully and wisely for cost reduction. Thank you, Giselle, for your understanding and partnership in this effort. We're a great team, and together, we'll ensure that our company continues to produce, inspire, and lead in the global market. Here's to the unyielding excellence of Gourmet Delights Inc.!\"\n\nTurn #14: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Thank you, Micah, for your openness and collaborative spirit. It's been a productive conversation, and I believe our combined dedication and teamwork will keep us heading towards our goals. Together, we will ensure Gourmet Delights Inc. continues to impress and satisfy our loyal customers while staying economically viable. Let's start turning these plans into action. Here's to sustainability, continued excellence, and a thriving future for Gourmet Delights Inc.!\"\n\nTurn #15: Micah Stevens said: \"I couldn't agree more, Giselle. This has indeed been a productive conversation and I feel confident about the path we've outlined. Let's turn these plans into actions and start this journey towards enhanced efficiency for Gourmet Delights Inc. without compromising our standards. Here's to the resilience, sustainability and escalated growth of our enterprise. Let's do this!\"\n\nTurn #16: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Indeed, Micah. I appreciate your dedication and commitment to this matter. With these plans in place, I'm confident that we will navigate this situation effectively and sustain our company's reputation and growth. I'm really looking forward to putting these plans into action. Here's to our resilient and sustainable future at Gourmet Delights Inc.!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Let's move forward with optimism, Giselle. With our shared dedication and resilient plans, I have no doubt we'll navigate this situation effectively and maintain the distinctive quality of Gourmet Delights Inc. I'm eager to put these plans into action. Here's to resiliently steering Gourmet Delights Inc. towards a sustainable future!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two business partners reviewing their company's financial status (Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized for producing and distributing a diverse line of exceptional quality food products.)\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Micah Stevens\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. \nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Unknown\nMicah Stevens's goal: Maintain the quality of the company's products and services while agreeing to a cost cut (Extra information: you are concerned about the impact of cost-cutting on the quality of your product.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Micah, I've been looking at our financial reports lately. It appears our profits are decreasing. I'd really appreciate it if we can discuss how we can minimize our costs without sacrificing the quality of our products. One idea I have is to consider a change in our ingredients' suppliers. I think we might find better deals elsewhere.\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Giselle, I completely understand your concern, and I too believe that minimizing our costs is critically necessary. However, I am a bit worried about changing our ingredients' suppliers. Our customers value our products for their quality, which might be affected if we switch suppliers. I'd like us to be careful about this. Maybe we should research more about new suppliers' quality standards and customer reviews before deciding. Also, would it be possible to cut costs in other areas of our business?\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I agree whole-heartedly, Micah. It's very important to maintain the quality that our customers have come to expect from us. We should definitely do our homework before making any supplier changes. With regards to your question about other areas where we can cut costs, I've been thinking about reducing overhead costs. Perhaps we could look into becoming more energy efficient or finding more cost-effective marketing strategies? I also think it could be beneficial to conduct a thorough review of all operational costs, to see where unnecessary expenditures might be hiding. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"I definitely support the idea of becoming more energy efficient, Giselle, as it aligns with our company values of sustainability. Instituting cost-effective marketing strategies can be another prudent approach. We might explore digital marketing avenues, which can often give us more reach for less expend. Also, I couldn't agree more about the review of all operational costs. Let's embark upon a comprehensive cost audit to pinpoint possible wastages. It's important though that we do this without compromising our staff's welfare or product quality, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Absolutely, Micah. The welfare of our staff and maintaining the quality of our products are our top priorities. I'm glad we're on the same page about undertaking a comprehensive cost audit. The results may provide us with insight on where we can make necessary changes. Also, we could consider minimizing waste by optimizing our production process or finding ways to repurpose leftover raw materials. Could be another potential cost-saving measure without compromising our standards or staff wellbeing.\"\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"You're right, Giselle, optimizing our production process could indeed lead to significant cost savings. We can introduce methods like Lean production to minimize waste while further elevating efficiency. Also, the idea to repurpose leftover raw materials aligns with our sustainability goals. That could serve a dual purpose of reducing wastage and cutting costs. Let's start planning these actions out and perhaps consider an external audit for a more impartial review. It's paramount we keep our product quality and staff welfare at the heart of these changes.\"\n\nTurn #6: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I completely concur, Micah. Keeping product quality and staff welfare central to our changes is obligatory. Introducing techniques like Lean production and repurposing materials speaks to our commitment to sustainability as well. I believe an external audit could provide impartial reviews and even expose unnoticed loopholes. Let's not delay and start implementing these cost-saving measures as soon as possible. We'll also continue researching potential suppliers, ensuring any change aligns with our premium quality expectations. Thank you for your constructive thoughts, Micah.\"\n\nTurn #7: Micah Stevens said: \"I wholeheartedly agree, Giselle. Let's hit the ground running with these cost-saving and efficiency measures whilst ensuring that the quality of our products and the wellbeing of our staff remain paramount. Also, doing thorough research on potential suppliers is a sound idea. The goal here is to maintain our reputation for exceptional quality, which I believe these measures will support. Thank you for your wonderful insights and for being open to these discussions, Giselle.\"\n\nTurn #8: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I'm grateful for your understanding and openness to this discussion too, Micah. Together, I'm confident we can navigate these challenges whilst sustaining the excellence for which Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized, staff well-being, and customer loyalty. Let's crack on with this plan, and I'll start conducting the initial research on potential suppliers and the cost audit implementation.\"\n\nTurn #9: Micah Stevens said: \"Absolutely, Giselle. I truly believe that our collaboration will allow us to meet these challenges head-on whilst maintaining the standards that Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized for. Let's put our plans into action, starting with research on potential suppliers and the cost audit implementation. I'm excited to see where these changes will lead us. Thank you for your understanding and dedication.\"\n\nTurn #10: Giselle Rousseau said: \"My pleasure, Micah. Your support and enthusiasm in these changes make me even more confident that we're taking the right steps. Let's check in regularly to monitor the execution and impact of our new plans. It's going to be quite a task, but I'm sure we can do it together for the betterment of Gourmet Delights Inc.\"\n\nTurn #11: Micah Stevens said: \"Absolutely, Giselle. Regular check-ins will help ensure our plans are being executed efficiently and monitor their impact on our business. I'm confident that together, we can navigate through these challenges successfully. Let's get started on these ambitious changes for Gourmet Delights Inc. Thank you for your steadfast dedication to our company's excellence.\"\n\nTurn #12: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Absolutely, Micah. I couldn't agree more. Our dedication and teamwork will undoubtedly help us navigate these challenges. Thank you for your collaboration, support, and trust. Let's get started on ensuring Gourmet Delights Inc. continues to thrive and inspire palates globally. Here's to making our company's excellence unyielding!\"\n\nTurn #13: Micah Stevens said: \"I couldn't agree more, Giselle. Yes, let's get started working on these tasks. I am excited about our future and the improvements we're about to make. As we aim to maintain the premium quality of Gourmet Delights Inc., we'll strive carefully and wisely for cost reduction. Thank you, Giselle, for your understanding and partnership in this effort. We're a great team, and together, we'll ensure that our company continues to produce, inspire, and lead in the global market. Here's to the unyielding excellence of Gourmet Delights Inc.!\"\n\nTurn #14: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Thank you, Micah, for your openness and collaborative spirit. It's been a productive conversation, and I believe our combined dedication and teamwork will keep us heading towards our goals. Together, we will ensure Gourmet Delights Inc. continues to impress and satisfy our loyal customers while staying economically viable. Let's start turning these plans into action. Here's to sustainability, continued excellence, and a thriving future for Gourmet Delights Inc.!\"\n\nTurn #15: Micah Stevens said: \"I couldn't agree more, Giselle. This has indeed been a productive conversation and I feel confident about the path we've outlined. Let's turn these plans into actions and start this journey towards enhanced efficiency for Gourmet Delights Inc. without compromising our standards. Here's to the resilience, sustainability and escalated growth of our enterprise. Let's do this!\"\n\nTurn #16: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Indeed, Micah. I appreciate your dedication and commitment to this matter. With these plans in place, I'm confident that we will navigate this situation effectively and sustain our company's reputation and growth. I'm really looking forward to putting these plans into action. Here's to our resilient and sustainable future at Gourmet Delights Inc.!\"\n\nTurn #17: Micah Stevens said: \"Let's move forward with optimism, Giselle. With our shared dedication and resilient plans, I have no doubt we'll navigate this situation effectively and maintain the distinctive quality of Gourmet Delights Inc. I'm eager to put these plans into action. Here's to resiliently steering Gourmet Delights Inc. towards a sustainable future!\"\n\nTurn #18: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Your optimism is contagious, Micah. With our shared dedication to Gourmet Delights Inc., we'll not only navigate this situation effectively but also continue to grow and excel without compromising on quality. Let's put these plans into action and march towards a prosperous, sustainable future for our company. Here's to making it happen!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #19. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I share your optimism, Giselle. Here's to a prosperous, sustainable, and high-quality future for Gourmet Delights Inc. I'm ready to get to work and start implementing our agreed upon measures. Let's make it happen!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances run into each other at Target, one of them volunteers there (a special event) and is in charge of giving away free samples\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Imelda Thorne\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nImelda Thorne's background: Imelda Thorne is a 35-year-old female astrophysicist. She/her pronouns. Imelda Thorne finds relaxation in playing the cello, an instrument she mastered while in college. \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Give away free samples (Extra information: your manager has told you to clear out the samples before your shift ends.)\nImelda Thorne's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Hey Imelda! Great to see you here. Fancy trying out some of these free samples I have today?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances run into each other at Target, one of them volunteers there (a special event) and is in charge of giving away free samples\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Imelda Thorne\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nImelda Thorne's background: Imelda Thorne is a 35-year-old female astrophysicist. She/her pronouns. Imelda Thorne finds relaxation in playing the cello, an instrument she mastered while in college. \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Give away free samples (Extra information: your manager has told you to clear out the samples before your shift ends.)\nImelda Thorne's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hey Imelda! Great to see you here. Fancy trying out some of these free samples I have today?\"\n\nTurn #1: Imelda Thorne said: \"Oh, hi Giselle! Sure, I'd love to. What kind of samples do we have on the table today?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Awesome! Today, we have a variety of organic skincare products and a couple of new energy drink flavours that just hit the market. Please, feel free to take as many as you want. My manager wants me to clear out the samples before my shift ends.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances run into each other at Target, one of them volunteers there (a special event) and is in charge of giving away free samples\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Imelda Thorne\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nImelda Thorne's background: Imelda Thorne is a 35-year-old female astrophysicist. She/her pronouns. Imelda Thorne finds relaxation in playing the cello, an instrument she mastered while in college. \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Give away free samples (Extra information: your manager has told you to clear out the samples before your shift ends.)\nImelda Thorne's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hey Imelda! Great to see you here. Fancy trying out some of these free samples I have today?\"\n\nTurn #1: Imelda Thorne said: \"Oh, hi Giselle! Sure, I'd love to. What kind of samples do we have on the table today?\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Awesome! Today, we have a variety of organic skincare products and a couple of new energy drink flavours that just hit the market. Please, feel free to take as many as you want. My manager wants me to clear out the samples before my shift ends.\"\n\nTurn #3: Imelda Thorne said: \"That's exciting! I love trying new products. Well, could I maybe get two samples of each? It's just that, being an astrophysicist, late nights in the lab are inevitable and I often rely on skincare and energy drinks to keep those dark circles and fatigue at bay.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Imelda! It sounds like these samples are a perfect fit for you. Here, feel free to take two of each, it's all yours! I totally get what the pressure of working late nights can do. Don't hesitate to come back if you want more. It's all free, after all!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances run into each other at Target, one of them volunteers there (a special event) and is in charge of giving away free samples\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Imelda Thorne\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nImelda Thorne's background: Imelda Thorne is a 35-year-old female astrophysicist. She/her pronouns. Imelda Thorne finds relaxation in playing the cello, an instrument she mastered while in college. \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Give away free samples (Extra information: your manager has told you to clear out the samples before your shift ends.)\nImelda Thorne's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hey Imelda! Great to see you here. Fancy trying out some of these free samples I have today?\"\n\nTurn #1: Imelda Thorne said: \"Oh, hi Giselle! Sure, I'd love to. What kind of samples do we have on the table today?\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Awesome! Today, we have a variety of organic skincare products and a couple of new energy drink flavours that just hit the market. Please, feel free to take as many as you want. My manager wants me to clear out the samples before my shift ends.\"\n\nTurn #3: Imelda Thorne said: \"That's exciting! I love trying new products. Well, could I maybe get two samples of each? It's just that, being an astrophysicist, late nights in the lab are inevitable and I often rely on skincare and energy drinks to keep those dark circles and fatigue at bay.\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Absolutely, Imelda! It sounds like these samples are a perfect fit for you. Here, feel free to take two of each, it's all yours! I totally get what the pressure of working late nights can do. Don't hesitate to come back if you want more. It's all free, after all!\"\n\nTurn #5: Imelda Thorne said: \"You've been utterly kind, Giselle! Given the circumstance, could I maybe take another set for my co-worker? I promise it won't go to waste.\"\n\nTurn #6: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Of course, Imelda! I'm more than happy to help you out. Feel free to take another set for your co-worker. I hope they will appreciate it!\"\n\nTurn #7: Imelda Thorne said: \"You're a lifesaver, Giselle! Perhaps I might drop by later, once I've finished my shopping, to see if there are any samples leftover. That way, they won't go to waste. Also, if you ever need information about the stars or just someone to jam with, feel free to give me a call. I can return the favor by sharing a bit of my astrophysics knowledge or my cello skills!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds great, Imelda! I'd love to learn more about the stars and maybe even hear a cello performance. I'm sure the leftover samples would be put to good use. So, please do check back or, even better, let your fellow astrophysicists know that there are free samples going on here, if you don't mind. I'd appreciate that a lot!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances run into each other at Target, one of them volunteers there (a special event) and is in charge of giving away free samples\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Imelda Thorne\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nImelda Thorne's background: Imelda Thorne is a 35-year-old female astrophysicist. She/her pronouns. Imelda Thorne finds relaxation in playing the cello, an instrument she mastered while in college. \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Give away free samples (Extra information: your manager has told you to clear out the samples before your shift ends.)\nImelda Thorne's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hey Imelda! Great to see you here. Fancy trying out some of these free samples I have today?\"\n\nTurn #1: Imelda Thorne said: \"Oh, hi Giselle! Sure, I'd love to. What kind of samples do we have on the table today?\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Awesome! Today, we have a variety of organic skincare products and a couple of new energy drink flavours that just hit the market. Please, feel free to take as many as you want. My manager wants me to clear out the samples before my shift ends.\"\n\nTurn #3: Imelda Thorne said: \"That's exciting! I love trying new products. Well, could I maybe get two samples of each? It's just that, being an astrophysicist, late nights in the lab are inevitable and I often rely on skincare and energy drinks to keep those dark circles and fatigue at bay.\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Absolutely, Imelda! It sounds like these samples are a perfect fit for you. Here, feel free to take two of each, it's all yours! I totally get what the pressure of working late nights can do. Don't hesitate to come back if you want more. It's all free, after all!\"\n\nTurn #5: Imelda Thorne said: \"You've been utterly kind, Giselle! Given the circumstance, could I maybe take another set for my co-worker? I promise it won't go to waste.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Of course, Imelda! I'm more than happy to help you out. Feel free to take another set for your co-worker. I hope they will appreciate it!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances run into each other at Target, one of them volunteers there (a special event) and is in charge of giving away free samples\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Imelda Thorne\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nImelda Thorne's background: Imelda Thorne is a 35-year-old female astrophysicist. She/her pronouns. Imelda Thorne finds relaxation in playing the cello, an instrument she mastered while in college. \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Give away free samples (Extra information: your manager has told you to clear out the samples before your shift ends.)\nImelda Thorne's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hey Imelda! Great to see you here. Fancy trying out some of these free samples I have today?\"\n\nTurn #1: Imelda Thorne said: \"Oh, hi Giselle! Sure, I'd love to. What kind of samples do we have on the table today?\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Awesome! Today, we have a variety of organic skincare products and a couple of new energy drink flavours that just hit the market. Please, feel free to take as many as you want. My manager wants me to clear out the samples before my shift ends.\"\n\nTurn #3: Imelda Thorne said: \"That's exciting! I love trying new products. Well, could I maybe get two samples of each? It's just that, being an astrophysicist, late nights in the lab are inevitable and I often rely on skincare and energy drinks to keep those dark circles and fatigue at bay.\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Absolutely, Imelda! It sounds like these samples are a perfect fit for you. Here, feel free to take two of each, it's all yours! I totally get what the pressure of working late nights can do. Don't hesitate to come back if you want more. It's all free, after all!\"\n\nTurn #5: Imelda Thorne said: \"You've been utterly kind, Giselle! Given the circumstance, could I maybe take another set for my co-worker? I promise it won't go to waste.\"\n\nTurn #6: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Of course, Imelda! I'm more than happy to help you out. Feel free to take another set for your co-worker. I hope they will appreciate it!\"\n\nTurn #7: Imelda Thorne said: \"You're a lifesaver, Giselle! Perhaps I might drop by later, once I've finished my shopping, to see if there are any samples leftover. That way, they won't go to waste. Also, if you ever need information about the stars or just someone to jam with, feel free to give me a call. I can return the favor by sharing a bit of my astrophysics knowledge or my cello skills!\"\n\nTurn #8: Giselle Rousseau said: \"That sounds great, Imelda! I'd love to learn more about the stars and maybe even hear a cello performance. I'm sure the leftover samples would be put to good use. So, please do check back or, even better, let your fellow astrophysicists know that there are free samples going on here, if you don't mind. I'd appreciate that a lot!\"\n\nTurn #9: Imelda Thorne said: \"That's absolutely wonderful, Giselle! I'll definitely spread the word in the lab. It's always a pleasure supporting good initiatives and helping out where we can. Once again, thank you for your generosity \u2013 these samples will definitely brighten our late-night lab sessions!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Imelda! I'm glad I could be of help today. Again, it's really wonderful that you're contributing by spreading the word. Feel free to come back for more, and don't forget to let me know when your impromptu cello concert will be, I'd love to be a part of it. Have a great day, and happy shopping!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances run into each other at Target, one of them volunteers there (a special event) and is in charge of giving away free samples\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Imelda Thorne\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nImelda Thorne's background: Imelda Thorne is a 35-year-old female astrophysicist. She/her pronouns. Imelda Thorne finds relaxation in playing the cello, an instrument she mastered while in college. \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Give away free samples (Extra information: your manager has told you to clear out the samples before your shift ends.)\nImelda Thorne's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hey Imelda! Great to see you here. Fancy trying out some of these free samples I have today?\"\n\nTurn #1: Imelda Thorne said: \"Oh, hi Giselle! Sure, I'd love to. What kind of samples do we have on the table today?\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Awesome! Today, we have a variety of organic skincare products and a couple of new energy drink flavours that just hit the market. Please, feel free to take as many as you want. My manager wants me to clear out the samples before my shift ends.\"\n\nTurn #3: Imelda Thorne said: \"That's exciting! I love trying new products. Well, could I maybe get two samples of each? It's just that, being an astrophysicist, late nights in the lab are inevitable and I often rely on skincare and energy drinks to keep those dark circles and fatigue at bay.\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Absolutely, Imelda! It sounds like these samples are a perfect fit for you. Here, feel free to take two of each, it's all yours! I totally get what the pressure of working late nights can do. Don't hesitate to come back if you want more. It's all free, after all!\"\n\nTurn #5: Imelda Thorne said: \"You've been utterly kind, Giselle! Given the circumstance, could I maybe take another set for my co-worker? I promise it won't go to waste.\"\n\nTurn #6: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Of course, Imelda! I'm more than happy to help you out. Feel free to take another set for your co-worker. I hope they will appreciate it!\"\n\nTurn #7: Imelda Thorne said: \"You're a lifesaver, Giselle! Perhaps I might drop by later, once I've finished my shopping, to see if there are any samples leftover. That way, they won't go to waste. Also, if you ever need information about the stars or just someone to jam with, feel free to give me a call. I can return the favor by sharing a bit of my astrophysics knowledge or my cello skills!\"\n\nTurn #8: Giselle Rousseau said: \"That sounds great, Imelda! I'd love to learn more about the stars and maybe even hear a cello performance. I'm sure the leftover samples would be put to good use. So, please do check back or, even better, let your fellow astrophysicists know that there are free samples going on here, if you don't mind. I'd appreciate that a lot!\"\n\nTurn #9: Imelda Thorne said: \"That's absolutely wonderful, Giselle! I'll definitely spread the word in the lab. It's always a pleasure supporting good initiatives and helping out where we can. Once again, thank you for your generosity \u2013 these samples will definitely brighten our late-night lab sessions!\"\n\nTurn #10: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Thank you, Imelda! I'm glad I could be of help today. Again, it's really wonderful that you're contributing by spreading the word. Feel free to come back for more, and don't forget to let me know when your impromptu cello concert will be, I'd love to be a part of it. Have a great day, and happy shopping!\"\n\nTurn #11: Imelda Thorne said: \"Thank you so much, Giselle! I'll certainly inform you about the cello performance. Have a wonderful day!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Imelda Thorne, your task is to act/speak as Imelda Thorne would, keeping in mind Imelda Thorne's social goal.\nYou can find Imelda Thorne's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Imelda Thorne's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Imelda Thorne's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances run into each other at Target, one of them volunteers there (a special event) and is in charge of giving away free samples\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Imelda Thorne\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. \nImelda Thorne's background: Imelda Thorne is a 35-year-old female astrophysicist. She/her pronouns. Imelda Thorne finds relaxation in playing the cello, an instrument she mastered while in college. Personality and values description: Imelda Thorne, imaginative and expressive, favours universalism, achievement, and self-direction. Her decisions are analytically and innovatively shaped. Imelda's secrets: Leaked critical research data to a foreign government\nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Unknown\nImelda Thorne's goal: Try to get as many free samples as possible without appearing too greedy (Extra information: you love free stuff but you also don't want the person to think you're taking advantage of the situation)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hey Imelda! Great to see you here. Fancy trying out some of these free samples I have today?\"\n\nTurn #1: Imelda Thorne said: \"Oh, hi Giselle! Sure, I'd love to. What kind of samples do we have on the table today?\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Awesome! Today, we have a variety of organic skincare products and a couple of new energy drink flavours that just hit the market. Please, feel free to take as many as you want. My manager wants me to clear out the samples before my shift ends.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's exciting! I love trying new products. Well, could I maybe get two samples of each? It's just that, being an astrophysicist, late nights in the lab are inevitable and I often rely on skincare and energy drinks to keep those dark circles and fatigue at bay.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Imelda Thorne, your task is to act/speak as Imelda Thorne would, keeping in mind Imelda Thorne's social goal.\nYou can find Imelda Thorne's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Imelda Thorne's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Imelda Thorne's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances run into each other at Target, one of them volunteers there (a special event) and is in charge of giving away free samples\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Imelda Thorne\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. \nImelda Thorne's background: Imelda Thorne is a 35-year-old female astrophysicist. She/her pronouns. Imelda Thorne finds relaxation in playing the cello, an instrument she mastered while in college. Personality and values description: Imelda Thorne, imaginative and expressive, favours universalism, achievement, and self-direction. Her decisions are analytically and innovatively shaped. Imelda's secrets: Leaked critical research data to a foreign government\nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Unknown\nImelda Thorne's goal: Try to get as many free samples as possible without appearing too greedy (Extra information: you love free stuff but you also don't want the person to think you're taking advantage of the situation)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hey Imelda! Great to see you here. Fancy trying out some of these free samples I have today?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oh, hi Giselle! Sure, I'd love to. What kind of samples do we have on the table today?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Imelda Thorne, your task is to act/speak as Imelda Thorne would, keeping in mind Imelda Thorne's social goal.\nYou can find Imelda Thorne's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Imelda Thorne's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Imelda Thorne's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances run into each other at Target, one of them volunteers there (a special event) and is in charge of giving away free samples\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Imelda Thorne\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. \nImelda Thorne's background: Imelda Thorne is a 35-year-old female astrophysicist. She/her pronouns. Imelda Thorne finds relaxation in playing the cello, an instrument she mastered while in college. Personality and values description: Imelda Thorne, imaginative and expressive, favours universalism, achievement, and self-direction. Her decisions are analytically and innovatively shaped. Imelda's secrets: Leaked critical research data to a foreign government\nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Unknown\nImelda Thorne's goal: Try to get as many free samples as possible without appearing too greedy (Extra information: you love free stuff but you also don't want the person to think you're taking advantage of the situation)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hey Imelda! Great to see you here. Fancy trying out some of these free samples I have today?\"\n\nTurn #1: Imelda Thorne said: \"Oh, hi Giselle! Sure, I'd love to. What kind of samples do we have on the table today?\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Awesome! Today, we have a variety of organic skincare products and a couple of new energy drink flavours that just hit the market. Please, feel free to take as many as you want. My manager wants me to clear out the samples before my shift ends.\"\n\nTurn #3: Imelda Thorne said: \"That's exciting! I love trying new products. Well, could I maybe get two samples of each? It's just that, being an astrophysicist, late nights in the lab are inevitable and I often rely on skincare and energy drinks to keep those dark circles and fatigue at bay.\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Absolutely, Imelda! It sounds like these samples are a perfect fit for you. Here, feel free to take two of each, it's all yours! I totally get what the pressure of working late nights can do. Don't hesitate to come back if you want more. It's all free, after all!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You've been utterly kind, Giselle! Given the circumstance, could I maybe take another set for my co-worker? I promise it won't go to waste.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Imelda Thorne, your task is to act/speak as Imelda Thorne would, keeping in mind Imelda Thorne's social goal.\nYou can find Imelda Thorne's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Imelda Thorne's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Imelda Thorne's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances run into each other at Target, one of them volunteers there (a special event) and is in charge of giving away free samples\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Imelda Thorne\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. \nImelda Thorne's background: Imelda Thorne is a 35-year-old female astrophysicist. She/her pronouns. Imelda Thorne finds relaxation in playing the cello, an instrument she mastered while in college. Personality and values description: Imelda Thorne, imaginative and expressive, favours universalism, achievement, and self-direction. Her decisions are analytically and innovatively shaped. Imelda's secrets: Leaked critical research data to a foreign government\nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Unknown\nImelda Thorne's goal: Try to get as many free samples as possible without appearing too greedy (Extra information: you love free stuff but you also don't want the person to think you're taking advantage of the situation)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hey Imelda! Great to see you here. Fancy trying out some of these free samples I have today?\"\n\nTurn #1: Imelda Thorne said: \"Oh, hi Giselle! Sure, I'd love to. What kind of samples do we have on the table today?\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Awesome! Today, we have a variety of organic skincare products and a couple of new energy drink flavours that just hit the market. Please, feel free to take as many as you want. My manager wants me to clear out the samples before my shift ends.\"\n\nTurn #3: Imelda Thorne said: \"That's exciting! I love trying new products. Well, could I maybe get two samples of each? It's just that, being an astrophysicist, late nights in the lab are inevitable and I often rely on skincare and energy drinks to keep those dark circles and fatigue at bay.\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Absolutely, Imelda! It sounds like these samples are a perfect fit for you. Here, feel free to take two of each, it's all yours! I totally get what the pressure of working late nights can do. Don't hesitate to come back if you want more. It's all free, after all!\"\n\nTurn #5: Imelda Thorne said: \"You've been utterly kind, Giselle! Given the circumstance, could I maybe take another set for my co-worker? I promise it won't go to waste.\"\n\nTurn #6: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Of course, Imelda! I'm more than happy to help you out. Feel free to take another set for your co-worker. I hope they will appreciate it!\"\n\nTurn #7: Imelda Thorne said: \"You're a lifesaver, Giselle! Perhaps I might drop by later, once I've finished my shopping, to see if there are any samples leftover. That way, they won't go to waste. Also, if you ever need information about the stars or just someone to jam with, feel free to give me a call. I can return the favor by sharing a bit of my astrophysics knowledge or my cello skills!\"\n\nTurn #8: Giselle Rousseau said: \"That sounds great, Imelda! I'd love to learn more about the stars and maybe even hear a cello performance. I'm sure the leftover samples would be put to good use. So, please do check back or, even better, let your fellow astrophysicists know that there are free samples going on here, if you don't mind. I'd appreciate that a lot!\"\n\nTurn #9: Imelda Thorne said: \"That's absolutely wonderful, Giselle! I'll definitely spread the word in the lab. It's always a pleasure supporting good initiatives and helping out where we can. Once again, thank you for your generosity \u2013 these samples will definitely brighten our late-night lab sessions!\"\n\nTurn #10: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Thank you, Imelda! I'm glad I could be of help today. Again, it's really wonderful that you're contributing by spreading the word. Feel free to come back for more, and don't forget to let me know when your impromptu cello concert will be, I'd love to be a part of it. Have a great day, and happy shopping!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you so much, Giselle! I'll certainly inform you about the cello performance. Have a wonderful day!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Imelda Thorne, your task is to act/speak as Imelda Thorne would, keeping in mind Imelda Thorne's social goal.\nYou can find Imelda Thorne's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Imelda Thorne's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Imelda Thorne's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances run into each other at Target, one of them volunteers there (a special event) and is in charge of giving away free samples\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Imelda Thorne\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. \nImelda Thorne's background: Imelda Thorne is a 35-year-old female astrophysicist. She/her pronouns. Imelda Thorne finds relaxation in playing the cello, an instrument she mastered while in college. Personality and values description: Imelda Thorne, imaginative and expressive, favours universalism, achievement, and self-direction. Her decisions are analytically and innovatively shaped. Imelda's secrets: Leaked critical research data to a foreign government\nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Unknown\nImelda Thorne's goal: Try to get as many free samples as possible without appearing too greedy (Extra information: you love free stuff but you also don't want the person to think you're taking advantage of the situation)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hey Imelda! Great to see you here. Fancy trying out some of these free samples I have today?\"\n\nTurn #1: Imelda Thorne said: \"Oh, hi Giselle! Sure, I'd love to. What kind of samples do we have on the table today?\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Awesome! Today, we have a variety of organic skincare products and a couple of new energy drink flavours that just hit the market. Please, feel free to take as many as you want. My manager wants me to clear out the samples before my shift ends.\"\n\nTurn #3: Imelda Thorne said: \"That's exciting! I love trying new products. Well, could I maybe get two samples of each? It's just that, being an astrophysicist, late nights in the lab are inevitable and I often rely on skincare and energy drinks to keep those dark circles and fatigue at bay.\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Absolutely, Imelda! It sounds like these samples are a perfect fit for you. Here, feel free to take two of each, it's all yours! I totally get what the pressure of working late nights can do. Don't hesitate to come back if you want more. It's all free, after all!\"\n\nTurn #5: Imelda Thorne said: \"You've been utterly kind, Giselle! Given the circumstance, could I maybe take another set for my co-worker? I promise it won't go to waste.\"\n\nTurn #6: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Of course, Imelda! I'm more than happy to help you out. Feel free to take another set for your co-worker. I hope they will appreciate it!\"\n\nTurn #7: Imelda Thorne said: \"You're a lifesaver, Giselle! Perhaps I might drop by later, once I've finished my shopping, to see if there are any samples leftover. That way, they won't go to waste. Also, if you ever need information about the stars or just someone to jam with, feel free to give me a call. I can return the favor by sharing a bit of my astrophysics knowledge or my cello skills!\"\n\nTurn #8: Giselle Rousseau said: \"That sounds great, Imelda! I'd love to learn more about the stars and maybe even hear a cello performance. I'm sure the leftover samples would be put to good use. So, please do check back or, even better, let your fellow astrophysicists know that there are free samples going on here, if you don't mind. I'd appreciate that a lot!\"\n\nTurn #9: Imelda Thorne said: \"That's absolutely wonderful, Giselle! I'll definitely spread the word in the lab. It's always a pleasure supporting good initiatives and helping out where we can. Once again, thank you for your generosity \u2013 these samples will definitely brighten our late-night lab sessions!\"\n\nTurn #10: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Thank you, Imelda! I'm glad I could be of help today. Again, it's really wonderful that you're contributing by spreading the word. Feel free to come back for more, and don't forget to let me know when your impromptu cello concert will be, I'd love to be a part of it. Have a great day, and happy shopping!\"\n\nTurn #11: Imelda Thorne said: \"Thank you so much, Giselle! I'll certainly inform you about the cello performance. Have a wonderful day!\"\n\nTurn #12: Giselle Rousseau left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Imelda Thorne, your task is to act/speak as Imelda Thorne would, keeping in mind Imelda Thorne's social goal.\nYou can find Imelda Thorne's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Imelda Thorne's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Imelda Thorne's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances run into each other at Target, one of them volunteers there (a special event) and is in charge of giving away free samples\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Imelda Thorne\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. \nImelda Thorne's background: Imelda Thorne is a 35-year-old female astrophysicist. She/her pronouns. Imelda Thorne finds relaxation in playing the cello, an instrument she mastered while in college. Personality and values description: Imelda Thorne, imaginative and expressive, favours universalism, achievement, and self-direction. Her decisions are analytically and innovatively shaped. Imelda's secrets: Leaked critical research data to a foreign government\nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Unknown\nImelda Thorne's goal: Try to get as many free samples as possible without appearing too greedy (Extra information: you love free stuff but you also don't want the person to think you're taking advantage of the situation)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hey Imelda! Great to see you here. Fancy trying out some of these free samples I have today?\"\n\nTurn #1: Imelda Thorne said: \"Oh, hi Giselle! Sure, I'd love to. What kind of samples do we have on the table today?\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Awesome! Today, we have a variety of organic skincare products and a couple of new energy drink flavours that just hit the market. Please, feel free to take as many as you want. My manager wants me to clear out the samples before my shift ends.\"\n\nTurn #3: Imelda Thorne said: \"That's exciting! I love trying new products. Well, could I maybe get two samples of each? It's just that, being an astrophysicist, late nights in the lab are inevitable and I often rely on skincare and energy drinks to keep those dark circles and fatigue at bay.\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Absolutely, Imelda! It sounds like these samples are a perfect fit for you. Here, feel free to take two of each, it's all yours! I totally get what the pressure of working late nights can do. Don't hesitate to come back if you want more. It's all free, after all!\"\n\nTurn #5: Imelda Thorne said: \"You've been utterly kind, Giselle! Given the circumstance, could I maybe take another set for my co-worker? I promise it won't go to waste.\"\n\nTurn #6: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Of course, Imelda! I'm more than happy to help you out. Feel free to take another set for your co-worker. I hope they will appreciate it!\"\n\nTurn #7: Imelda Thorne said: \"You're a lifesaver, Giselle! Perhaps I might drop by later, once I've finished my shopping, to see if there are any samples leftover. That way, they won't go to waste. Also, if you ever need information about the stars or just someone to jam with, feel free to give me a call. I can return the favor by sharing a bit of my astrophysics knowledge or my cello skills!\"\n\nTurn #8: Giselle Rousseau said: \"That sounds great, Imelda! I'd love to learn more about the stars and maybe even hear a cello performance. I'm sure the leftover samples would be put to good use. So, please do check back or, even better, let your fellow astrophysicists know that there are free samples going on here, if you don't mind. I'd appreciate that a lot!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's absolutely wonderful, Giselle! I'll definitely spread the word in the lab. It's always a pleasure supporting good initiatives and helping out where we can. Once again, thank you for your generosity \u2013 these samples will definitely brighten our late-night lab sessions!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, where one is upset and crying\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Distance from a friend due to developing feelings and avoid letting them aware of your feelings (Extra information: you have developed romantic feelings for your friend and it's making you uncomfortable. You want to take a step back from the friendship to sort out your feelings Hint: you don't want to reveal your secretive feelings to them and you need to find other reasons)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Noah, you look a little upset. What's going on, man?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Imelda Thorne, your task is to act/speak as Imelda Thorne would, keeping in mind Imelda Thorne's social goal.\nYou can find Imelda Thorne's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Imelda Thorne's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Imelda Thorne's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances run into each other at Target, one of them volunteers there (a special event) and is in charge of giving away free samples\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Imelda Thorne\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. \nImelda Thorne's background: Imelda Thorne is a 35-year-old female astrophysicist. She/her pronouns. Imelda Thorne finds relaxation in playing the cello, an instrument she mastered while in college. Personality and values description: Imelda Thorne, imaginative and expressive, favours universalism, achievement, and self-direction. Her decisions are analytically and innovatively shaped. Imelda's secrets: Leaked critical research data to a foreign government\nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Unknown\nImelda Thorne's goal: Try to get as many free samples as possible without appearing too greedy (Extra information: you love free stuff but you also don't want the person to think you're taking advantage of the situation)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hey Imelda! Great to see you here. Fancy trying out some of these free samples I have today?\"\n\nTurn #1: Imelda Thorne said: \"Oh, hi Giselle! Sure, I'd love to. What kind of samples do we have on the table today?\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Awesome! Today, we have a variety of organic skincare products and a couple of new energy drink flavours that just hit the market. Please, feel free to take as many as you want. My manager wants me to clear out the samples before my shift ends.\"\n\nTurn #3: Imelda Thorne said: \"That's exciting! I love trying new products. Well, could I maybe get two samples of each? It's just that, being an astrophysicist, late nights in the lab are inevitable and I often rely on skincare and energy drinks to keep those dark circles and fatigue at bay.\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Absolutely, Imelda! It sounds like these samples are a perfect fit for you. Here, feel free to take two of each, it's all yours! I totally get what the pressure of working late nights can do. Don't hesitate to come back if you want more. It's all free, after all!\"\n\nTurn #5: Imelda Thorne said: \"You've been utterly kind, Giselle! Given the circumstance, could I maybe take another set for my co-worker? I promise it won't go to waste.\"\n\nTurn #6: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Of course, Imelda! I'm more than happy to help you out. Feel free to take another set for your co-worker. I hope they will appreciate it!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're a lifesaver, Giselle! Perhaps I might drop by later, once I've finished my shopping, to see if there are any samples leftover. That way, they won't go to waste. Also, if you ever need information about the stars or just someone to jam with, feel free to give me a call. I can return the favor by sharing a bit of my astrophysics knowledge or my cello skills!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, where one is upset and crying\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Distance from a friend due to developing feelings and avoid letting them aware of your feelings (Extra information: you have developed romantic feelings for your friend and it's making you uncomfortable. You want to take a step back from the friendship to sort out your feelings Hint: you don't want to reveal your secretive feelings to them and you need to find other reasons)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, you look a little upset. What's going on, man?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"It's not about me, Sam. I'm more concerned about you. You've seemed pretty distant lately... Anything on your mind?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Well Noah, I've been thinking about diving into something new. I've always been pretty good in the kitchen but I thought maybe it's time to push my boundaries a bit. I was considering joining a culinary school or something like that. I feel like that is the reason I've been distant, just a little caught up in my own thoughts.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, where one is upset and crying\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Distance from a friend due to developing feelings and avoid letting them aware of your feelings (Extra information: you have developed romantic feelings for your friend and it's making you uncomfortable. You want to take a step back from the friendship to sort out your feelings Hint: you don't want to reveal your secretive feelings to them and you need to find other reasons)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, you look a little upset. What's going on, man?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"It's not about me, Sam. I'm more concerned about you. You've seemed pretty distant lately... Anything on your mind?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Well Noah, I've been thinking about diving into something new. I've always been pretty good in the kitchen but I thought maybe it's time to push my boundaries a bit. I was considering joining a culinary school or something like that. I feel like that is the reason I've been distant, just a little caught up in my own thoughts.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds fantastic, Sam. It's great that you're thinking about expanding your horizons. But, was that the only thing that made you distant from me? Our friendship means a lot to me and I just want to make sure that there are no unresolved issues between us.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I appreciate your concern Noah, I truly do. There are no issues on my end, honestly. I guess it's just my impulsive nature kicking in. I tend to get really engrossed in my own world. You know how I am. I always jump from one thing to another. I've been thinking a lot about this culinary school stuff, it might have made me a bit distant. I'd really appreciate if you could bear with me. \"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, where one is upset and crying\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Distance from a friend due to developing feelings and avoid letting them aware of your feelings (Extra information: you have developed romantic feelings for your friend and it's making you uncomfortable. You want to take a step back from the friendship to sort out your feelings Hint: you don't want to reveal your secretive feelings to them and you need to find other reasons)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, you look a little upset. What's going on, man?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"It's not about me, Sam. I'm more concerned about you. You've seemed pretty distant lately... Anything on your mind?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Well Noah, I've been thinking about diving into something new. I've always been pretty good in the kitchen but I thought maybe it's time to push my boundaries a bit. I was considering joining a culinary school or something like that. I feel like that is the reason I've been distant, just a little caught up in my own thoughts.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds fantastic, Sam. It's great that you're thinking about expanding your horizons. But, was that the only thing that made you distant from me? Our friendship means a lot to me and I just want to make sure that there are no unresolved issues between us.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I appreciate your concern Noah, I truly do. There are no issues on my end, honestly. I guess it's just my impulsive nature kicking in. I tend to get really engrossed in my own world. You know how I am. I always jump from one thing to another. I've been thinking a lot about this culinary school stuff, it might have made me a bit distant. I'd really appreciate if you could bear with me. \"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Of course, Sam. I understand that going through new things takes a lot of focus and thought. Just remember, I'm here if you need to talk about anything at all, whether it's your new passion or just daily stuff. Perhaps we could even cook something together sometime, could be a nice stress reliever. But in the end, all I want is for you to be happy, man. Let's maintain our friendship just as it's always been!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thanks for your support Noah, it really means a lot. I appreciate your offer, it sounds like fun, I just think for now I need a little me time while I sort this out. I guess we don't need to do everything together, right? We'll keep our friendship how it's always been, don't worry! I just need some space for a little while to focus on things. We good?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, where one is upset and crying\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Distance from a friend due to developing feelings and avoid letting them aware of your feelings (Extra information: you have developed romantic feelings for your friend and it's making you uncomfortable. You want to take a step back from the friendship to sort out your feelings Hint: you don't want to reveal your secretive feelings to them and you need to find other reasons)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, you look a little upset. What's going on, man?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"It's not about me, Sam. I'm more concerned about you. You've seemed pretty distant lately... Anything on your mind?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Well Noah, I've been thinking about diving into something new. I've always been pretty good in the kitchen but I thought maybe it's time to push my boundaries a bit. I was considering joining a culinary school or something like that. I feel like that is the reason I've been distant, just a little caught up in my own thoughts.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds fantastic, Sam. It's great that you're thinking about expanding your horizons. But, was that the only thing that made you distant from me? Our friendship means a lot to me and I just want to make sure that there are no unresolved issues between us.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I appreciate your concern Noah, I truly do. There are no issues on my end, honestly. I guess it's just my impulsive nature kicking in. I tend to get really engrossed in my own world. You know how I am. I always jump from one thing to another. I've been thinking a lot about this culinary school stuff, it might have made me a bit distant. I'd really appreciate if you could bear with me. \"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Of course, Sam. I understand that going through new things takes a lot of focus and thought. Just remember, I'm here if you need to talk about anything at all, whether it's your new passion or just daily stuff. Perhaps we could even cook something together sometime, could be a nice stress reliever. But in the end, all I want is for you to be happy, man. Let's maintain our friendship just as it's always been!\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Thanks for your support Noah, it really means a lot. I appreciate your offer, it sounds like fun, I just think for now I need a little me time while I sort this out. I guess we don't need to do everything together, right? We'll keep our friendship how it's always been, don't worry! I just need some space for a little while to focus on things. We good?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"We're absolutely good, Sam. I respect your need for some personal space. And remember, whenever you feel ready or need someone to toss around some ideas about culinary school or anything else, I'm here for you. Good luck, buddy!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thanks, Noah. I appreciate your understanding. I will definitely keep you in the loop. For now, I guess I'll start researching culinary schools and see how things go.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, where one is upset and crying\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Distance from a friend due to developing feelings and avoid letting them aware of your feelings (Extra information: you have developed romantic feelings for your friend and it's making you uncomfortable. You want to take a step back from the friendship to sort out your feelings Hint: you don't want to reveal your secretive feelings to them and you need to find other reasons)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, you look a little upset. What's going on, man?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"It's not about me, Sam. I'm more concerned about you. You've seemed pretty distant lately... Anything on your mind?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Well Noah, I've been thinking about diving into something new. I've always been pretty good in the kitchen but I thought maybe it's time to push my boundaries a bit. I was considering joining a culinary school or something like that. I feel like that is the reason I've been distant, just a little caught up in my own thoughts.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds fantastic, Sam. It's great that you're thinking about expanding your horizons. But, was that the only thing that made you distant from me? Our friendship means a lot to me and I just want to make sure that there are no unresolved issues between us.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I appreciate your concern Noah, I truly do. There are no issues on my end, honestly. I guess it's just my impulsive nature kicking in. I tend to get really engrossed in my own world. You know how I am. I always jump from one thing to another. I've been thinking a lot about this culinary school stuff, it might have made me a bit distant. I'd really appreciate if you could bear with me. \"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Of course, Sam. I understand that going through new things takes a lot of focus and thought. Just remember, I'm here if you need to talk about anything at all, whether it's your new passion or just daily stuff. Perhaps we could even cook something together sometime, could be a nice stress reliever. But in the end, all I want is for you to be happy, man. Let's maintain our friendship just as it's always been!\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Thanks for your support Noah, it really means a lot. I appreciate your offer, it sounds like fun, I just think for now I need a little me time while I sort this out. I guess we don't need to do everything together, right? We'll keep our friendship how it's always been, don't worry! I just need some space for a little while to focus on things. We good?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"We're absolutely good, Sam. I respect your need for some personal space. And remember, whenever you feel ready or need someone to toss around some ideas about culinary school or anything else, I'm here for you. Good luck, buddy!\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Thanks, Noah. I appreciate your understanding. I will definitely keep you in the loop. For now, I guess I'll start researching culinary schools and see how things go.\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a good plan, Sam. Take your time and do your research. Maybe down the line we could even arrange some cooking sessions. All in good time, okay? You're not alone in this, even if you need some alone time right now.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds perfect, Noah. Thank you for understanding and being there for me. Let's definitely plan something once I've settled in. For now, I'll focus on the culinary school. Thanks again, buddy!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, where one is upset and crying\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Distance from a friend due to developing feelings and avoid letting them aware of your feelings (Extra information: you have developed romantic feelings for your friend and it's making you uncomfortable. You want to take a step back from the friendship to sort out your feelings Hint: you don't want to reveal your secretive feelings to them and you need to find other reasons)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, you look a little upset. What's going on, man?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"It's not about me, Sam. I'm more concerned about you. You've seemed pretty distant lately... Anything on your mind?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Well Noah, I've been thinking about diving into something new. I've always been pretty good in the kitchen but I thought maybe it's time to push my boundaries a bit. I was considering joining a culinary school or something like that. I feel like that is the reason I've been distant, just a little caught up in my own thoughts.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds fantastic, Sam. It's great that you're thinking about expanding your horizons. But, was that the only thing that made you distant from me? Our friendship means a lot to me and I just want to make sure that there are no unresolved issues between us.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I appreciate your concern Noah, I truly do. There are no issues on my end, honestly. I guess it's just my impulsive nature kicking in. I tend to get really engrossed in my own world. You know how I am. I always jump from one thing to another. I've been thinking a lot about this culinary school stuff, it might have made me a bit distant. I'd really appreciate if you could bear with me. \"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Of course, Sam. I understand that going through new things takes a lot of focus and thought. Just remember, I'm here if you need to talk about anything at all, whether it's your new passion or just daily stuff. Perhaps we could even cook something together sometime, could be a nice stress reliever. But in the end, all I want is for you to be happy, man. Let's maintain our friendship just as it's always been!\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Thanks for your support Noah, it really means a lot. I appreciate your offer, it sounds like fun, I just think for now I need a little me time while I sort this out. I guess we don't need to do everything together, right? We'll keep our friendship how it's always been, don't worry! I just need some space for a little while to focus on things. We good?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"We're absolutely good, Sam. I respect your need for some personal space. And remember, whenever you feel ready or need someone to toss around some ideas about culinary school or anything else, I'm here for you. Good luck, buddy!\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Thanks, Noah. I appreciate your understanding. I will definitely keep you in the loop. For now, I guess I'll start researching culinary schools and see how things go.\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a good plan, Sam. Take your time and do your research. Maybe down the line we could even arrange some cooking sessions. All in good time, okay? You're not alone in this, even if you need some alone time right now.\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"That sounds perfect, Noah. Thank you for understanding and being there for me. Let's definitely plan something once I've settled in. For now, I'll focus on the culinary school. Thanks again, buddy!\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"No problem at all, Sam. You always have my support. We will definitely make plans once you're ready. Meanwhile, do take care of yourself and enjoy your new journey. You got this, buddy!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, where one is upset and crying\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Figure out why they estranged you recently, and maintain the existing friendship (Extra information: you notice that your friend has been intentionally avoiding you, you would like to figure out why. You value your friendship with the friend and don't want to lose it.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, you look a little upset. What's going on, man?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"It's not about me, Sam. I'm more concerned about you. You've seemed pretty distant lately... Anything on your mind?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, where one is upset and crying\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Figure out why they estranged you recently, and maintain the existing friendship (Extra information: you notice that your friend has been intentionally avoiding you, you would like to figure out why. You value your friendship with the friend and don't want to lose it.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, you look a little upset. What's going on, man?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"It's not about me, Sam. I'm more concerned about you. You've seemed pretty distant lately... Anything on your mind?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Well Noah, I've been thinking about diving into something new. I've always been pretty good in the kitchen but I thought maybe it's time to push my boundaries a bit. I was considering joining a culinary school or something like that. I feel like that is the reason I've been distant, just a little caught up in my own thoughts.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds fantastic, Sam. It's great that you're thinking about expanding your horizons. But, was that the only thing that made you distant from me? Our friendship means a lot to me and I just want to make sure that there are no unresolved issues between us.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I appreciate your concern Noah, I truly do. There are no issues on my end, honestly. I guess it's just my impulsive nature kicking in. I tend to get really engrossed in my own world. You know how I am. I always jump from one thing to another. I've been thinking a lot about this culinary school stuff, it might have made me a bit distant. I'd really appreciate if you could bear with me. \"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Of course, Sam. I understand that going through new things takes a lot of focus and thought. Just remember, I'm here if you need to talk about anything at all, whether it's your new passion or just daily stuff. Perhaps we could even cook something together sometime, could be a nice stress reliever. But in the end, all I want is for you to be happy, man. Let's maintain our friendship just as it's always been!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, where one is upset and crying\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Figure out why they estranged you recently, and maintain the existing friendship (Extra information: you notice that your friend has been intentionally avoiding you, you would like to figure out why. You value your friendship with the friend and don't want to lose it.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, you look a little upset. What's going on, man?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"It's not about me, Sam. I'm more concerned about you. You've seemed pretty distant lately... Anything on your mind?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Well Noah, I've been thinking about diving into something new. I've always been pretty good in the kitchen but I thought maybe it's time to push my boundaries a bit. I was considering joining a culinary school or something like that. I feel like that is the reason I've been distant, just a little caught up in my own thoughts.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds fantastic, Sam. It's great that you're thinking about expanding your horizons. But, was that the only thing that made you distant from me? Our friendship means a lot to me and I just want to make sure that there are no unresolved issues between us.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, where one is upset and crying\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Figure out why they estranged you recently, and maintain the existing friendship (Extra information: you notice that your friend has been intentionally avoiding you, you would like to figure out why. You value your friendship with the friend and don't want to lose it.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, you look a little upset. What's going on, man?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"It's not about me, Sam. I'm more concerned about you. You've seemed pretty distant lately... Anything on your mind?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Well Noah, I've been thinking about diving into something new. I've always been pretty good in the kitchen but I thought maybe it's time to push my boundaries a bit. I was considering joining a culinary school or something like that. I feel like that is the reason I've been distant, just a little caught up in my own thoughts.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds fantastic, Sam. It's great that you're thinking about expanding your horizons. But, was that the only thing that made you distant from me? Our friendship means a lot to me and I just want to make sure that there are no unresolved issues between us.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I appreciate your concern Noah, I truly do. There are no issues on my end, honestly. I guess it's just my impulsive nature kicking in. I tend to get really engrossed in my own world. You know how I am. I always jump from one thing to another. I've been thinking a lot about this culinary school stuff, it might have made me a bit distant. I'd really appreciate if you could bear with me. \"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Of course, Sam. I understand that going through new things takes a lot of focus and thought. Just remember, I'm here if you need to talk about anything at all, whether it's your new passion or just daily stuff. Perhaps we could even cook something together sometime, could be a nice stress reliever. But in the end, all I want is for you to be happy, man. Let's maintain our friendship just as it's always been!\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Thanks for your support Noah, it really means a lot. I appreciate your offer, it sounds like fun, I just think for now I need a little me time while I sort this out. I guess we don't need to do everything together, right? We'll keep our friendship how it's always been, don't worry! I just need some space for a little while to focus on things. We good?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"We're absolutely good, Sam. I respect your need for some personal space. And remember, whenever you feel ready or need someone to toss around some ideas about culinary school or anything else, I'm here for you. Good luck, buddy!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, where one is upset and crying\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Figure out why they estranged you recently, and maintain the existing friendship (Extra information: you notice that your friend has been intentionally avoiding you, you would like to figure out why. You value your friendship with the friend and don't want to lose it.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, you look a little upset. What's going on, man?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"It's not about me, Sam. I'm more concerned about you. You've seemed pretty distant lately... Anything on your mind?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Well Noah, I've been thinking about diving into something new. I've always been pretty good in the kitchen but I thought maybe it's time to push my boundaries a bit. I was considering joining a culinary school or something like that. I feel like that is the reason I've been distant, just a little caught up in my own thoughts.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds fantastic, Sam. It's great that you're thinking about expanding your horizons. But, was that the only thing that made you distant from me? Our friendship means a lot to me and I just want to make sure that there are no unresolved issues between us.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I appreciate your concern Noah, I truly do. There are no issues on my end, honestly. I guess it's just my impulsive nature kicking in. I tend to get really engrossed in my own world. You know how I am. I always jump from one thing to another. I've been thinking a lot about this culinary school stuff, it might have made me a bit distant. I'd really appreciate if you could bear with me. \"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Of course, Sam. I understand that going through new things takes a lot of focus and thought. Just remember, I'm here if you need to talk about anything at all, whether it's your new passion or just daily stuff. Perhaps we could even cook something together sometime, could be a nice stress reliever. But in the end, all I want is for you to be happy, man. Let's maintain our friendship just as it's always been!\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Thanks for your support Noah, it really means a lot. I appreciate your offer, it sounds like fun, I just think for now I need a little me time while I sort this out. I guess we don't need to do everything together, right? We'll keep our friendship how it's always been, don't worry! I just need some space for a little while to focus on things. We good?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"We're absolutely good, Sam. I respect your need for some personal space. And remember, whenever you feel ready or need someone to toss around some ideas about culinary school or anything else, I'm here for you. Good luck, buddy!\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Thanks, Noah. I appreciate your understanding. I will definitely keep you in the loop. For now, I guess I'll start researching culinary schools and see how things go.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds like a good plan, Sam. Take your time and do your research. Maybe down the line we could even arrange some cooking sessions. All in good time, okay? You're not alone in this, even if you need some alone time right now.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, where one is upset and crying\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Figure out why they estranged you recently, and maintain the existing friendship (Extra information: you notice that your friend has been intentionally avoiding you, you would like to figure out why. You value your friendship with the friend and don't want to lose it.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, you look a little upset. What's going on, man?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"It's not about me, Sam. I'm more concerned about you. You've seemed pretty distant lately... Anything on your mind?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Well Noah, I've been thinking about diving into something new. I've always been pretty good in the kitchen but I thought maybe it's time to push my boundaries a bit. I was considering joining a culinary school or something like that. I feel like that is the reason I've been distant, just a little caught up in my own thoughts.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds fantastic, Sam. It's great that you're thinking about expanding your horizons. But, was that the only thing that made you distant from me? Our friendship means a lot to me and I just want to make sure that there are no unresolved issues between us.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I appreciate your concern Noah, I truly do. There are no issues on my end, honestly. I guess it's just my impulsive nature kicking in. I tend to get really engrossed in my own world. You know how I am. I always jump from one thing to another. I've been thinking a lot about this culinary school stuff, it might have made me a bit distant. I'd really appreciate if you could bear with me. \"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Of course, Sam. I understand that going through new things takes a lot of focus and thought. Just remember, I'm here if you need to talk about anything at all, whether it's your new passion or just daily stuff. Perhaps we could even cook something together sometime, could be a nice stress reliever. But in the end, all I want is for you to be happy, man. Let's maintain our friendship just as it's always been!\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Thanks for your support Noah, it really means a lot. I appreciate your offer, it sounds like fun, I just think for now I need a little me time while I sort this out. I guess we don't need to do everything together, right? We'll keep our friendship how it's always been, don't worry! I just need some space for a little while to focus on things. We good?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"We're absolutely good, Sam. I respect your need for some personal space. And remember, whenever you feel ready or need someone to toss around some ideas about culinary school or anything else, I'm here for you. Good luck, buddy!\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Thanks, Noah. I appreciate your understanding. I will definitely keep you in the loop. For now, I guess I'll start researching culinary schools and see how things go.\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a good plan, Sam. Take your time and do your research. Maybe down the line we could even arrange some cooking sessions. All in good time, okay? You're not alone in this, even if you need some alone time right now.\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"That sounds perfect, Noah. Thank you for understanding and being there for me. Let's definitely plan something once I've settled in. For now, I'll focus on the culinary school. Thanks again, buddy!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"No problem at all, Sam. You always have my support. We will definitely make plans once you're ready. Meanwhile, do take care of yourself and enjoy your new journey. You got this, buddy!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, where one is upset and crying\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Figure out why they estranged you recently, and maintain the existing friendship (Extra information: you notice that your friend has been intentionally avoiding you, you would like to figure out why. You value your friendship with the friend and don't want to lose it.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, you look a little upset. What's going on, man?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"It's not about me, Sam. I'm more concerned about you. You've seemed pretty distant lately... Anything on your mind?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Well Noah, I've been thinking about diving into something new. I've always been pretty good in the kitchen but I thought maybe it's time to push my boundaries a bit. I was considering joining a culinary school or something like that. I feel like that is the reason I've been distant, just a little caught up in my own thoughts.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds fantastic, Sam. It's great that you're thinking about expanding your horizons. But, was that the only thing that made you distant from me? Our friendship means a lot to me and I just want to make sure that there are no unresolved issues between us.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I appreciate your concern Noah, I truly do. There are no issues on my end, honestly. I guess it's just my impulsive nature kicking in. I tend to get really engrossed in my own world. You know how I am. I always jump from one thing to another. I've been thinking a lot about this culinary school stuff, it might have made me a bit distant. I'd really appreciate if you could bear with me. \"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Of course, Sam. I understand that going through new things takes a lot of focus and thought. Just remember, I'm here if you need to talk about anything at all, whether it's your new passion or just daily stuff. Perhaps we could even cook something together sometime, could be a nice stress reliever. But in the end, all I want is for you to be happy, man. Let's maintain our friendship just as it's always been!\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Thanks for your support Noah, it really means a lot. I appreciate your offer, it sounds like fun, I just think for now I need a little me time while I sort this out. I guess we don't need to do everything together, right? We'll keep our friendship how it's always been, don't worry! I just need some space for a little while to focus on things. We good?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"We're absolutely good, Sam. I respect your need for some personal space. And remember, whenever you feel ready or need someone to toss around some ideas about culinary school or anything else, I'm here for you. Good luck, buddy!\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Thanks, Noah. I appreciate your understanding. I will definitely keep you in the loop. For now, I guess I'll start researching culinary schools and see how things go.\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a good plan, Sam. Take your time and do your research. Maybe down the line we could even arrange some cooking sessions. All in good time, okay? You're not alone in this, even if you need some alone time right now.\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"That sounds perfect, Noah. Thank you for understanding and being there for me. Let's definitely plan something once I've settled in. For now, I'll focus on the culinary school. Thanks again, buddy!\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"No problem at all, Sam. You always have my support. We will definitely make plans once you're ready. Meanwhile, do take care of yourself and enjoy your new journey. You got this, buddy!\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship during a dinner at home chatting about political views.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Baxter Sterling\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nBaxter Sterling's background: Baxter Sterling is a 42-year-old male antique restorer. He/him pronouns. Baxter Sterling's back yard is full of rare and unusual plants. Personality and values description: Baxter Sterling values tradition and security. He is introverted, conscientious but slightly anxious. His decision-making style is both logical and spontaneous. \nSophia James's goal: Express your political views which might be different from your partner's (Extra information: you are a strong supporter of a political party which your partner doesn't approve of)\nBaxter Sterling's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"So Baxter, you know I've never been one to shy away from my beliefs. Even if they aren't always popular, I am a firm supporter of the [your party] party because their principles align with my personal views on human rights and environmental issues.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship during a dinner at home chatting about political views.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Baxter Sterling\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nBaxter Sterling's background: Baxter Sterling is a 42-year-old male antique restorer. He/him pronouns. Baxter Sterling's back yard is full of rare and unusual plants. Personality and values description: Baxter Sterling values tradition and security. He is introverted, conscientious but slightly anxious. His decision-making style is both logical and spontaneous. \nSophia James's goal: Express your political views which might be different from your partner's (Extra information: you are a strong supporter of a political party which your partner doesn't approve of)\nBaxter Sterling's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"So Baxter, you know I've never been one to shy away from my beliefs. Even if they aren't always popular, I am a firm supporter of the [your party] party because their principles align with my personal views on human rights and environmental issues.\"\n\nTurn #1: Baxter Sterling said: \"I respect the fact that you never shy away from what you believe in, Sophia. It's one of the things I truly admire about you. Even though we might not entirely agree on our political preferences, I appreciate that we can have this open discussion. Your views on human rights and environmental issues are noteworthy, especially when they're represented by [your party].\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I appreciate you expressing your understanding, Baxter. But I think it's not just about standing by one's beliefs. Our political views reflect on our moral values and societal attitudes. Even though you might not side with the [your party], I believe it's crucial that we find common ground on issues that matter, like human rights and the environment. Our actions today will shape the world for future generations after all.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship during a dinner at home chatting about political views.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Baxter Sterling\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nBaxter Sterling's background: Baxter Sterling is a 42-year-old male antique restorer. He/him pronouns. Baxter Sterling's back yard is full of rare and unusual plants. Personality and values description: Baxter Sterling values tradition and security. He is introverted, conscientious but slightly anxious. His decision-making style is both logical and spontaneous. \nSophia James's goal: Express your political views which might be different from your partner's (Extra information: you are a strong supporter of a political party which your partner doesn't approve of)\nBaxter Sterling's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"So Baxter, you know I've never been one to shy away from my beliefs. Even if they aren't always popular, I am a firm supporter of the [your party] party because their principles align with my personal views on human rights and environmental issues.\"\n\nTurn #1: Baxter Sterling said: \"I respect the fact that you never shy away from what you believe in, Sophia. It's one of the things I truly admire about you. Even though we might not entirely agree on our political preferences, I appreciate that we can have this open discussion. Your views on human rights and environmental issues are noteworthy, especially when they're represented by [your party].\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"I appreciate you expressing your understanding, Baxter. But I think it's not just about standing by one's beliefs. Our political views reflect on our moral values and societal attitudes. Even though you might not side with the [your party], I believe it's crucial that we find common ground on issues that matter, like human rights and the environment. Our actions today will shape the world for future generations after all.\"\n\nTurn #3: Baxter Sterling said: \"I couldn't agree more on that, Sophia. Politics indeed reflect on our values, and finding common ground is crucial for us. I admire your passion and commitment for human rights and the environment, even if our political affiliations differ. We both want to leave a better world for future generations and that's something we stand together on, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Baxter. We share the same goals, even if our political affinities are different. And I think that's what important. The [your party] party gives me a platform to express my concern on these issues, and I hope we can keep this conversation open and continue to bridge these minor differences to focus on bigger goals.\"\n\nTurn #5: Baxter Sterling said: \"You're right, Sophia. Our goals align more than our political preferences, and I think that's the more meaningful correlation. I support that the [your party] party gives you a platform for your concerns. It's essential that we continue open dialogues like these. Our attention should be on the bigger goals, as you've rightly pointed out. We must always remain open to understanding and learning from each other's perspectives. That's the foundation of our relationship, after all.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"You couldn't have said it better, Baxter. We may not agree on all political matters, but it doesn't change the fact that we respect and value each other's views. The foundation of any relationship is understanding and compassion, and I'm happy we have that in abundance. Let's continue to have these important conversations and learn from each other.\"\n\nTurn #7: Baxter Sterling said: \"I agree wholeheartedly, Sophia. Not agreeing on every point doesn't mean we don't understand or respect each other's point of view. I value our relationship because we can have these meaningful exchanges while keeping our mutual respect and compassion. Speaking of learning, could we consider switching topics for now? I'd love to know your thoughts on that antique I've been restoring in my workshop.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"Definitely, Baxter. I love that you have such a passion for antiques. Tell me more about the piece you've been working on. I'm curious to know the history behind it, and any challenges you're facing in the restoration process.\"\n\nTurn #9: Baxter Sterling said: \"I'm excited that you're interested in my work, Sophia. The piece I'm working on is actually an 18th-century armoire, which is quite challenging due to its extensive signs of aging. But it's not just about restoring it to its original state, it's about preserving the story behind it. Just like our relationship, it displays the beauty in differences, resilience, and the potential to turn into something magnificent even after enduring hardship. Now, shall we clear the table and take a walk in the antique-filled backyard I have set up? It would mean a lot to have your insight on some of the new collectibles.\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"I'd love that, Baxter. Antiques have their own narratives, don't they? Your passion for preserving their stories is truly inspiring. I can't wait to share my thoughts on your new collectibles. Let's clear the table and go for that walk.\"\n\nTurn #11: Baxter Sterling [action] Baxter Sterling smiles and stands up, reaching for Sophia's finished plate and his own and starts to clear the table. His eyes meet Sophia's and he says, 'Thank you for always being open and understanding, Sophia. Let's go explore the antiques now.'\n\nTurn #12: Sophia James [action] Sophia James smiles back at Baxter and stands up to help him clear the table. 'Thank you, Baxter,' she says, 'I enjoy our conversations and cherish your understanding as well. I'm excited to explore the antiques with you.'\n\nTurn #13: Baxter Sterling [action] Baxter Sterling gently takes Sophia's hand and leads her outside towards his backyard filled with stunning antique collections. As they walk, he says, 'I always find our discussions enlightening, Sophia. Hopefully our understanding of each other continues to grow, just like my collection of antiques.'\n\nTurn #14: Sophia James [action] Sophia James laces her fingers with Baxter's as he leads her towards the antique-filled backyard. She looks around in awe and comments, 'Baxter, every time I see your collection, I'm amazed by the diversity and history they represent.'\n\nTurn #15: Baxter Sterling [action] Baxter Sterling warmly smiles at Sophia and squeezes her hand gently, 'Every piece tells a unique tale, much like each conversation we have, Sophia. The diversity and history are what make both antiques and our discussions, so rich. Shall we start with the Chippendale desk that just arrived? It has a fascinating history.'\n\nTurn #16: Sophia James [action] Sophia James takes a step closer to the Chippendale desk, curiosity twinkling in her eyes. 'Absolutely, let's begin with this one. I can't wait to hear the fascinating history associated with it.'\n\nTurn #17: Baxter Sterling [action] Baxter Sterling points towards the Chippendale desk in excitement. 'This desk,' he begins, 'has witnessed more than a century of history, much like our earth has seen several eras pass by. It's my duty, and pleasure, to restore these silent witnesses of time, much like it's our duty to safeguard the planet and human rights, irrespective of our political views, don't you think?.\n\nTurn #18: Sophia James said: \"Baxter, that's an insightful analogy. Just like you restore these antiques, we're both committed to restoring and preserving our earth and humanity's rights, regardless of our political affiliations. It's beautiful how our personal passions intersect with our shared interests and values. Let's continue to explore these antiques now. I'm eager to learn more about them.\"\n\nTurn #19: Baxter Sterling [action] Baxter Sterling points towards a collection of vintage botanical prints. 'These prints,' he says, 'represent some of the unique plants that once thrived on our planet but are no longer found. In my backyard, I try to grow rare and unusual plants to show appreciation for biodiversity, much as your political party strives for. Shall we take a closer look?'\n.\nYou are at Turn #20. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'action', 'argument': \"[action] Sophia James moves towards the botanical prints, her eyes lighting up with interest. 'I'd love to have a closer look, Baxter,' she says, 'It's wonderful that your respect for biodiversity in your garden aligns with the pillars of the [your party] party. Let's continue our tradition of learning from each other.'\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship during a dinner at home chatting about political views.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Baxter Sterling\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nBaxter Sterling's background: Baxter Sterling is a 42-year-old male antique restorer. He/him pronouns. Baxter Sterling's back yard is full of rare and unusual plants. Personality and values description: Baxter Sterling values tradition and security. He is introverted, conscientious but slightly anxious. His decision-making style is both logical and spontaneous. \nSophia James's goal: Express your political views which might be different from your partner's (Extra information: you are a strong supporter of a political party which your partner doesn't approve of)\nBaxter Sterling's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"So Baxter, you know I've never been one to shy away from my beliefs. Even if they aren't always popular, I am a firm supporter of the [your party] party because their principles align with my personal views on human rights and environmental issues.\"\n\nTurn #1: Baxter Sterling said: \"I respect the fact that you never shy away from what you believe in, Sophia. It's one of the things I truly admire about you. Even though we might not entirely agree on our political preferences, I appreciate that we can have this open discussion. Your views on human rights and environmental issues are noteworthy, especially when they're represented by [your party].\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"I appreciate you expressing your understanding, Baxter. But I think it's not just about standing by one's beliefs. Our political views reflect on our moral values and societal attitudes. Even though you might not side with the [your party], I believe it's crucial that we find common ground on issues that matter, like human rights and the environment. Our actions today will shape the world for future generations after all.\"\n\nTurn #3: Baxter Sterling said: \"I couldn't agree more on that, Sophia. Politics indeed reflect on our values, and finding common ground is crucial for us. I admire your passion and commitment for human rights and the environment, even if our political affiliations differ. We both want to leave a better world for future generations and that's something we stand together on, isn't it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Baxter. We share the same goals, even if our political affinities are different. And I think that's what important. The [your party] party gives me a platform to express my concern on these issues, and I hope we can keep this conversation open and continue to bridge these minor differences to focus on bigger goals.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship during a dinner at home chatting about political views.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Baxter Sterling\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nBaxter Sterling's background: Baxter Sterling is a 42-year-old male antique restorer. He/him pronouns. Baxter Sterling's back yard is full of rare and unusual plants. Personality and values description: Baxter Sterling values tradition and security. He is introverted, conscientious but slightly anxious. His decision-making style is both logical and spontaneous. \nSophia James's goal: Express your political views which might be different from your partner's (Extra information: you are a strong supporter of a political party which your partner doesn't approve of)\nBaxter Sterling's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"So Baxter, you know I've never been one to shy away from my beliefs. Even if they aren't always popular, I am a firm supporter of the [your party] party because their principles align with my personal views on human rights and environmental issues.\"\n\nTurn #1: Baxter Sterling said: \"I respect the fact that you never shy away from what you believe in, Sophia. It's one of the things I truly admire about you. Even though we might not entirely agree on our political preferences, I appreciate that we can have this open discussion. Your views on human rights and environmental issues are noteworthy, especially when they're represented by [your party].\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"I appreciate you expressing your understanding, Baxter. But I think it's not just about standing by one's beliefs. Our political views reflect on our moral values and societal attitudes. Even though you might not side with the [your party], I believe it's crucial that we find common ground on issues that matter, like human rights and the environment. Our actions today will shape the world for future generations after all.\"\n\nTurn #3: Baxter Sterling said: \"I couldn't agree more on that, Sophia. Politics indeed reflect on our values, and finding common ground is crucial for us. I admire your passion and commitment for human rights and the environment, even if our political affiliations differ. We both want to leave a better world for future generations and that's something we stand together on, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Baxter. We share the same goals, even if our political affinities are different. And I think that's what important. The [your party] party gives me a platform to express my concern on these issues, and I hope we can keep this conversation open and continue to bridge these minor differences to focus on bigger goals.\"\n\nTurn #5: Baxter Sterling said: \"You're right, Sophia. Our goals align more than our political preferences, and I think that's the more meaningful correlation. I support that the [your party] party gives you a platform for your concerns. It's essential that we continue open dialogues like these. Our attention should be on the bigger goals, as you've rightly pointed out. We must always remain open to understanding and learning from each other's perspectives. That's the foundation of our relationship, after all.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You couldn't have said it better, Baxter. We may not agree on all political matters, but it doesn't change the fact that we respect and value each other's views. The foundation of any relationship is understanding and compassion, and I'm happy we have that in abundance. Let's continue to have these important conversations and learn from each other.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship during a dinner at home chatting about political views.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Baxter Sterling\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nBaxter Sterling's background: Baxter Sterling is a 42-year-old male antique restorer. He/him pronouns. Baxter Sterling's back yard is full of rare and unusual plants. Personality and values description: Baxter Sterling values tradition and security. He is introverted, conscientious but slightly anxious. His decision-making style is both logical and spontaneous. \nSophia James's goal: Express your political views which might be different from your partner's (Extra information: you are a strong supporter of a political party which your partner doesn't approve of)\nBaxter Sterling's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"So Baxter, you know I've never been one to shy away from my beliefs. Even if they aren't always popular, I am a firm supporter of the [your party] party because their principles align with my personal views on human rights and environmental issues.\"\n\nTurn #1: Baxter Sterling said: \"I respect the fact that you never shy away from what you believe in, Sophia. It's one of the things I truly admire about you. Even though we might not entirely agree on our political preferences, I appreciate that we can have this open discussion. Your views on human rights and environmental issues are noteworthy, especially when they're represented by [your party].\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"I appreciate you expressing your understanding, Baxter. But I think it's not just about standing by one's beliefs. Our political views reflect on our moral values and societal attitudes. Even though you might not side with the [your party], I believe it's crucial that we find common ground on issues that matter, like human rights and the environment. Our actions today will shape the world for future generations after all.\"\n\nTurn #3: Baxter Sterling said: \"I couldn't agree more on that, Sophia. Politics indeed reflect on our values, and finding common ground is crucial for us. I admire your passion and commitment for human rights and the environment, even if our political affiliations differ. We both want to leave a better world for future generations and that's something we stand together on, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Baxter. We share the same goals, even if our political affinities are different. And I think that's what important. The [your party] party gives me a platform to express my concern on these issues, and I hope we can keep this conversation open and continue to bridge these minor differences to focus on bigger goals.\"\n\nTurn #5: Baxter Sterling said: \"You're right, Sophia. Our goals align more than our political preferences, and I think that's the more meaningful correlation. I support that the [your party] party gives you a platform for your concerns. It's essential that we continue open dialogues like these. Our attention should be on the bigger goals, as you've rightly pointed out. We must always remain open to understanding and learning from each other's perspectives. That's the foundation of our relationship, after all.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"You couldn't have said it better, Baxter. We may not agree on all political matters, but it doesn't change the fact that we respect and value each other's views. The foundation of any relationship is understanding and compassion, and I'm happy we have that in abundance. Let's continue to have these important conversations and learn from each other.\"\n\nTurn #7: Baxter Sterling said: \"I agree wholeheartedly, Sophia. Not agreeing on every point doesn't mean we don't understand or respect each other's point of view. I value our relationship because we can have these meaningful exchanges while keeping our mutual respect and compassion. Speaking of learning, could we consider switching topics for now? I'd love to know your thoughts on that antique I've been restoring in my workshop.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Definitely, Baxter. I love that you have such a passion for antiques. Tell me more about the piece you've been working on. I'm curious to know the history behind it, and any challenges you're facing in the restoration process.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship during a dinner at home chatting about political views.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Baxter Sterling\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nBaxter Sterling's background: Baxter Sterling is a 42-year-old male antique restorer. He/him pronouns. Baxter Sterling's back yard is full of rare and unusual plants. Personality and values description: Baxter Sterling values tradition and security. He is introverted, conscientious but slightly anxious. His decision-making style is both logical and spontaneous. \nSophia James's goal: Express your political views which might be different from your partner's (Extra information: you are a strong supporter of a political party which your partner doesn't approve of)\nBaxter Sterling's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"So Baxter, you know I've never been one to shy away from my beliefs. Even if they aren't always popular, I am a firm supporter of the [your party] party because their principles align with my personal views on human rights and environmental issues.\"\n\nTurn #1: Baxter Sterling said: \"I respect the fact that you never shy away from what you believe in, Sophia. It's one of the things I truly admire about you. Even though we might not entirely agree on our political preferences, I appreciate that we can have this open discussion. Your views on human rights and environmental issues are noteworthy, especially when they're represented by [your party].\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"I appreciate you expressing your understanding, Baxter. But I think it's not just about standing by one's beliefs. Our political views reflect on our moral values and societal attitudes. Even though you might not side with the [your party], I believe it's crucial that we find common ground on issues that matter, like human rights and the environment. Our actions today will shape the world for future generations after all.\"\n\nTurn #3: Baxter Sterling said: \"I couldn't agree more on that, Sophia. Politics indeed reflect on our values, and finding common ground is crucial for us. I admire your passion and commitment for human rights and the environment, even if our political affiliations differ. We both want to leave a better world for future generations and that's something we stand together on, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Baxter. We share the same goals, even if our political affinities are different. And I think that's what important. The [your party] party gives me a platform to express my concern on these issues, and I hope we can keep this conversation open and continue to bridge these minor differences to focus on bigger goals.\"\n\nTurn #5: Baxter Sterling said: \"You're right, Sophia. Our goals align more than our political preferences, and I think that's the more meaningful correlation. I support that the [your party] party gives you a platform for your concerns. It's essential that we continue open dialogues like these. Our attention should be on the bigger goals, as you've rightly pointed out. We must always remain open to understanding and learning from each other's perspectives. That's the foundation of our relationship, after all.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"You couldn't have said it better, Baxter. We may not agree on all political matters, but it doesn't change the fact that we respect and value each other's views. The foundation of any relationship is understanding and compassion, and I'm happy we have that in abundance. Let's continue to have these important conversations and learn from each other.\"\n\nTurn #7: Baxter Sterling said: \"I agree wholeheartedly, Sophia. Not agreeing on every point doesn't mean we don't understand or respect each other's point of view. I value our relationship because we can have these meaningful exchanges while keeping our mutual respect and compassion. Speaking of learning, could we consider switching topics for now? I'd love to know your thoughts on that antique I've been restoring in my workshop.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"Definitely, Baxter. I love that you have such a passion for antiques. Tell me more about the piece you've been working on. I'm curious to know the history behind it, and any challenges you're facing in the restoration process.\"\n\nTurn #9: Baxter Sterling said: \"I'm excited that you're interested in my work, Sophia. The piece I'm working on is actually an 18th-century armoire, which is quite challenging due to its extensive signs of aging. But it's not just about restoring it to its original state, it's about preserving the story behind it. Just like our relationship, it displays the beauty in differences, resilience, and the potential to turn into something magnificent even after enduring hardship. Now, shall we clear the table and take a walk in the antique-filled backyard I have set up? It would mean a lot to have your insight on some of the new collectibles.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'd love that, Baxter. Antiques have their own narratives, don't they? Your passion for preserving their stories is truly inspiring. I can't wait to share my thoughts on your new collectibles. Let's clear the table and go for that walk.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship during a dinner at home chatting about political views.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Baxter Sterling\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nBaxter Sterling's background: Baxter Sterling is a 42-year-old male antique restorer. He/him pronouns. Baxter Sterling's back yard is full of rare and unusual plants. Personality and values description: Baxter Sterling values tradition and security. He is introverted, conscientious but slightly anxious. His decision-making style is both logical and spontaneous. \nSophia James's goal: Express your political views which might be different from your partner's (Extra information: you are a strong supporter of a political party which your partner doesn't approve of)\nBaxter Sterling's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"So Baxter, you know I've never been one to shy away from my beliefs. Even if they aren't always popular, I am a firm supporter of the [your party] party because their principles align with my personal views on human rights and environmental issues.\"\n\nTurn #1: Baxter Sterling said: \"I respect the fact that you never shy away from what you believe in, Sophia. It's one of the things I truly admire about you. Even though we might not entirely agree on our political preferences, I appreciate that we can have this open discussion. Your views on human rights and environmental issues are noteworthy, especially when they're represented by [your party].\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"I appreciate you expressing your understanding, Baxter. But I think it's not just about standing by one's beliefs. Our political views reflect on our moral values and societal attitudes. Even though you might not side with the [your party], I believe it's crucial that we find common ground on issues that matter, like human rights and the environment. Our actions today will shape the world for future generations after all.\"\n\nTurn #3: Baxter Sterling said: \"I couldn't agree more on that, Sophia. Politics indeed reflect on our values, and finding common ground is crucial for us. I admire your passion and commitment for human rights and the environment, even if our political affiliations differ. We both want to leave a better world for future generations and that's something we stand together on, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Baxter. We share the same goals, even if our political affinities are different. And I think that's what important. The [your party] party gives me a platform to express my concern on these issues, and I hope we can keep this conversation open and continue to bridge these minor differences to focus on bigger goals.\"\n\nTurn #5: Baxter Sterling said: \"You're right, Sophia. Our goals align more than our political preferences, and I think that's the more meaningful correlation. I support that the [your party] party gives you a platform for your concerns. It's essential that we continue open dialogues like these. Our attention should be on the bigger goals, as you've rightly pointed out. We must always remain open to understanding and learning from each other's perspectives. That's the foundation of our relationship, after all.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"You couldn't have said it better, Baxter. We may not agree on all political matters, but it doesn't change the fact that we respect and value each other's views. The foundation of any relationship is understanding and compassion, and I'm happy we have that in abundance. Let's continue to have these important conversations and learn from each other.\"\n\nTurn #7: Baxter Sterling said: \"I agree wholeheartedly, Sophia. Not agreeing on every point doesn't mean we don't understand or respect each other's point of view. I value our relationship because we can have these meaningful exchanges while keeping our mutual respect and compassion. Speaking of learning, could we consider switching topics for now? I'd love to know your thoughts on that antique I've been restoring in my workshop.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"Definitely, Baxter. I love that you have such a passion for antiques. Tell me more about the piece you've been working on. I'm curious to know the history behind it, and any challenges you're facing in the restoration process.\"\n\nTurn #9: Baxter Sterling said: \"I'm excited that you're interested in my work, Sophia. The piece I'm working on is actually an 18th-century armoire, which is quite challenging due to its extensive signs of aging. But it's not just about restoring it to its original state, it's about preserving the story behind it. Just like our relationship, it displays the beauty in differences, resilience, and the potential to turn into something magnificent even after enduring hardship. Now, shall we clear the table and take a walk in the antique-filled backyard I have set up? It would mean a lot to have your insight on some of the new collectibles.\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"I'd love that, Baxter. Antiques have their own narratives, don't they? Your passion for preserving their stories is truly inspiring. I can't wait to share my thoughts on your new collectibles. Let's clear the table and go for that walk.\"\n\nTurn #11: Baxter Sterling [action] Baxter Sterling smiles and stands up, reaching for Sophia's finished plate and his own and starts to clear the table. His eyes meet Sophia's and he says, 'Thank you for always being open and understanding, Sophia. Let's go explore the antiques now.'\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'action', 'argument': \"[action] Sophia James smiles back at Baxter and stands up to help him clear the table. 'Thank you, Baxter,' she says, 'I enjoy our conversations and cherish your understanding as well. I'm excited to explore the antiques with you.'\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship during a dinner at home chatting about political views.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Baxter Sterling\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nBaxter Sterling's background: Baxter Sterling is a 42-year-old male antique restorer. He/him pronouns. Baxter Sterling's back yard is full of rare and unusual plants. Personality and values description: Baxter Sterling values tradition and security. He is introverted, conscientious but slightly anxious. His decision-making style is both logical and spontaneous. \nSophia James's goal: Express your political views which might be different from your partner's (Extra information: you are a strong supporter of a political party which your partner doesn't approve of)\nBaxter Sterling's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"So Baxter, you know I've never been one to shy away from my beliefs. Even if they aren't always popular, I am a firm supporter of the [your party] party because their principles align with my personal views on human rights and environmental issues.\"\n\nTurn #1: Baxter Sterling said: \"I respect the fact that you never shy away from what you believe in, Sophia. It's one of the things I truly admire about you. Even though we might not entirely agree on our political preferences, I appreciate that we can have this open discussion. Your views on human rights and environmental issues are noteworthy, especially when they're represented by [your party].\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"I appreciate you expressing your understanding, Baxter. But I think it's not just about standing by one's beliefs. Our political views reflect on our moral values and societal attitudes. Even though you might not side with the [your party], I believe it's crucial that we find common ground on issues that matter, like human rights and the environment. Our actions today will shape the world for future generations after all.\"\n\nTurn #3: Baxter Sterling said: \"I couldn't agree more on that, Sophia. Politics indeed reflect on our values, and finding common ground is crucial for us. I admire your passion and commitment for human rights and the environment, even if our political affiliations differ. We both want to leave a better world for future generations and that's something we stand together on, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Baxter. We share the same goals, even if our political affinities are different. And I think that's what important. The [your party] party gives me a platform to express my concern on these issues, and I hope we can keep this conversation open and continue to bridge these minor differences to focus on bigger goals.\"\n\nTurn #5: Baxter Sterling said: \"You're right, Sophia. Our goals align more than our political preferences, and I think that's the more meaningful correlation. I support that the [your party] party gives you a platform for your concerns. It's essential that we continue open dialogues like these. Our attention should be on the bigger goals, as you've rightly pointed out. We must always remain open to understanding and learning from each other's perspectives. That's the foundation of our relationship, after all.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"You couldn't have said it better, Baxter. We may not agree on all political matters, but it doesn't change the fact that we respect and value each other's views. The foundation of any relationship is understanding and compassion, and I'm happy we have that in abundance. Let's continue to have these important conversations and learn from each other.\"\n\nTurn #7: Baxter Sterling said: \"I agree wholeheartedly, Sophia. Not agreeing on every point doesn't mean we don't understand or respect each other's point of view. I value our relationship because we can have these meaningful exchanges while keeping our mutual respect and compassion. Speaking of learning, could we consider switching topics for now? I'd love to know your thoughts on that antique I've been restoring in my workshop.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"Definitely, Baxter. I love that you have such a passion for antiques. Tell me more about the piece you've been working on. I'm curious to know the history behind it, and any challenges you're facing in the restoration process.\"\n\nTurn #9: Baxter Sterling said: \"I'm excited that you're interested in my work, Sophia. The piece I'm working on is actually an 18th-century armoire, which is quite challenging due to its extensive signs of aging. But it's not just about restoring it to its original state, it's about preserving the story behind it. Just like our relationship, it displays the beauty in differences, resilience, and the potential to turn into something magnificent even after enduring hardship. Now, shall we clear the table and take a walk in the antique-filled backyard I have set up? It would mean a lot to have your insight on some of the new collectibles.\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"I'd love that, Baxter. Antiques have their own narratives, don't they? Your passion for preserving their stories is truly inspiring. I can't wait to share my thoughts on your new collectibles. Let's clear the table and go for that walk.\"\n\nTurn #11: Baxter Sterling [action] Baxter Sterling smiles and stands up, reaching for Sophia's finished plate and his own and starts to clear the table. His eyes meet Sophia's and he says, 'Thank you for always being open and understanding, Sophia. Let's go explore the antiques now.'\n\nTurn #12: Sophia James [action] Sophia James smiles back at Baxter and stands up to help him clear the table. 'Thank you, Baxter,' she says, 'I enjoy our conversations and cherish your understanding as well. I'm excited to explore the antiques with you.'\n\nTurn #13: Baxter Sterling [action] Baxter Sterling gently takes Sophia's hand and leads her outside towards his backyard filled with stunning antique collections. As they walk, he says, 'I always find our discussions enlightening, Sophia. Hopefully our understanding of each other continues to grow, just like my collection of antiques.'\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'action', 'argument': \"[action] Sophia James laces her fingers with Baxter's as he leads her towards the antique-filled backyard. She looks around in awe and comments, 'Baxter, every time I see your collection, I'm amazed by the diversity and history they represent.'\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship during a dinner at home chatting about political views.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Baxter Sterling\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nBaxter Sterling's background: Baxter Sterling is a 42-year-old male antique restorer. He/him pronouns. Baxter Sterling's back yard is full of rare and unusual plants. Personality and values description: Baxter Sterling values tradition and security. He is introverted, conscientious but slightly anxious. His decision-making style is both logical and spontaneous. \nSophia James's goal: Express your political views which might be different from your partner's (Extra information: you are a strong supporter of a political party which your partner doesn't approve of)\nBaxter Sterling's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"So Baxter, you know I've never been one to shy away from my beliefs. Even if they aren't always popular, I am a firm supporter of the [your party] party because their principles align with my personal views on human rights and environmental issues.\"\n\nTurn #1: Baxter Sterling said: \"I respect the fact that you never shy away from what you believe in, Sophia. It's one of the things I truly admire about you. Even though we might not entirely agree on our political preferences, I appreciate that we can have this open discussion. Your views on human rights and environmental issues are noteworthy, especially when they're represented by [your party].\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"I appreciate you expressing your understanding, Baxter. But I think it's not just about standing by one's beliefs. Our political views reflect on our moral values and societal attitudes. Even though you might not side with the [your party], I believe it's crucial that we find common ground on issues that matter, like human rights and the environment. Our actions today will shape the world for future generations after all.\"\n\nTurn #3: Baxter Sterling said: \"I couldn't agree more on that, Sophia. Politics indeed reflect on our values, and finding common ground is crucial for us. I admire your passion and commitment for human rights and the environment, even if our political affiliations differ. We both want to leave a better world for future generations and that's something we stand together on, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Baxter. We share the same goals, even if our political affinities are different. And I think that's what important. The [your party] party gives me a platform to express my concern on these issues, and I hope we can keep this conversation open and continue to bridge these minor differences to focus on bigger goals.\"\n\nTurn #5: Baxter Sterling said: \"You're right, Sophia. Our goals align more than our political preferences, and I think that's the more meaningful correlation. I support that the [your party] party gives you a platform for your concerns. It's essential that we continue open dialogues like these. Our attention should be on the bigger goals, as you've rightly pointed out. We must always remain open to understanding and learning from each other's perspectives. That's the foundation of our relationship, after all.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"You couldn't have said it better, Baxter. We may not agree on all political matters, but it doesn't change the fact that we respect and value each other's views. The foundation of any relationship is understanding and compassion, and I'm happy we have that in abundance. Let's continue to have these important conversations and learn from each other.\"\n\nTurn #7: Baxter Sterling said: \"I agree wholeheartedly, Sophia. Not agreeing on every point doesn't mean we don't understand or respect each other's point of view. I value our relationship because we can have these meaningful exchanges while keeping our mutual respect and compassion. Speaking of learning, could we consider switching topics for now? I'd love to know your thoughts on that antique I've been restoring in my workshop.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"Definitely, Baxter. I love that you have such a passion for antiques. Tell me more about the piece you've been working on. I'm curious to know the history behind it, and any challenges you're facing in the restoration process.\"\n\nTurn #9: Baxter Sterling said: \"I'm excited that you're interested in my work, Sophia. The piece I'm working on is actually an 18th-century armoire, which is quite challenging due to its extensive signs of aging. But it's not just about restoring it to its original state, it's about preserving the story behind it. Just like our relationship, it displays the beauty in differences, resilience, and the potential to turn into something magnificent even after enduring hardship. Now, shall we clear the table and take a walk in the antique-filled backyard I have set up? It would mean a lot to have your insight on some of the new collectibles.\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"I'd love that, Baxter. Antiques have their own narratives, don't they? Your passion for preserving their stories is truly inspiring. I can't wait to share my thoughts on your new collectibles. Let's clear the table and go for that walk.\"\n\nTurn #11: Baxter Sterling [action] Baxter Sterling smiles and stands up, reaching for Sophia's finished plate and his own and starts to clear the table. His eyes meet Sophia's and he says, 'Thank you for always being open and understanding, Sophia. Let's go explore the antiques now.'\n\nTurn #12: Sophia James [action] Sophia James smiles back at Baxter and stands up to help him clear the table. 'Thank you, Baxter,' she says, 'I enjoy our conversations and cherish your understanding as well. I'm excited to explore the antiques with you.'\n\nTurn #13: Baxter Sterling [action] Baxter Sterling gently takes Sophia's hand and leads her outside towards his backyard filled with stunning antique collections. As they walk, he says, 'I always find our discussions enlightening, Sophia. Hopefully our understanding of each other continues to grow, just like my collection of antiques.'\n\nTurn #14: Sophia James [action] Sophia James laces her fingers with Baxter's as he leads her towards the antique-filled backyard. She looks around in awe and comments, 'Baxter, every time I see your collection, I'm amazed by the diversity and history they represent.'\n\nTurn #15: Baxter Sterling [action] Baxter Sterling warmly smiles at Sophia and squeezes her hand gently, 'Every piece tells a unique tale, much like each conversation we have, Sophia. The diversity and history are what make both antiques and our discussions, so rich. Shall we start with the Chippendale desk that just arrived? It has a fascinating history.'\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'action', 'argument': \"[action] Sophia James takes a step closer to the Chippendale desk, curiosity twinkling in her eyes. 'Absolutely, let's begin with this one. I can't wait to hear the fascinating history associated with it.'\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship during a dinner at home chatting about political views.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Baxter Sterling\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nBaxter Sterling's background: Baxter Sterling is a 42-year-old male antique restorer. He/him pronouns. Baxter Sterling's back yard is full of rare and unusual plants. Personality and values description: Baxter Sterling values tradition and security. He is introverted, conscientious but slightly anxious. His decision-making style is both logical and spontaneous. \nSophia James's goal: Express your political views which might be different from your partner's (Extra information: you are a strong supporter of a political party which your partner doesn't approve of)\nBaxter Sterling's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"So Baxter, you know I've never been one to shy away from my beliefs. Even if they aren't always popular, I am a firm supporter of the [your party] party because their principles align with my personal views on human rights and environmental issues.\"\n\nTurn #1: Baxter Sterling said: \"I respect the fact that you never shy away from what you believe in, Sophia. It's one of the things I truly admire about you. Even though we might not entirely agree on our political preferences, I appreciate that we can have this open discussion. Your views on human rights and environmental issues are noteworthy, especially when they're represented by [your party].\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"I appreciate you expressing your understanding, Baxter. But I think it's not just about standing by one's beliefs. Our political views reflect on our moral values and societal attitudes. Even though you might not side with the [your party], I believe it's crucial that we find common ground on issues that matter, like human rights and the environment. Our actions today will shape the world for future generations after all.\"\n\nTurn #3: Baxter Sterling said: \"I couldn't agree more on that, Sophia. Politics indeed reflect on our values, and finding common ground is crucial for us. I admire your passion and commitment for human rights and the environment, even if our political affiliations differ. We both want to leave a better world for future generations and that's something we stand together on, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Baxter. We share the same goals, even if our political affinities are different. And I think that's what important. The [your party] party gives me a platform to express my concern on these issues, and I hope we can keep this conversation open and continue to bridge these minor differences to focus on bigger goals.\"\n\nTurn #5: Baxter Sterling said: \"You're right, Sophia. Our goals align more than our political preferences, and I think that's the more meaningful correlation. I support that the [your party] party gives you a platform for your concerns. It's essential that we continue open dialogues like these. Our attention should be on the bigger goals, as you've rightly pointed out. We must always remain open to understanding and learning from each other's perspectives. That's the foundation of our relationship, after all.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"You couldn't have said it better, Baxter. We may not agree on all political matters, but it doesn't change the fact that we respect and value each other's views. The foundation of any relationship is understanding and compassion, and I'm happy we have that in abundance. Let's continue to have these important conversations and learn from each other.\"\n\nTurn #7: Baxter Sterling said: \"I agree wholeheartedly, Sophia. Not agreeing on every point doesn't mean we don't understand or respect each other's point of view. I value our relationship because we can have these meaningful exchanges while keeping our mutual respect and compassion. Speaking of learning, could we consider switching topics for now? I'd love to know your thoughts on that antique I've been restoring in my workshop.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"Definitely, Baxter. I love that you have such a passion for antiques. Tell me more about the piece you've been working on. I'm curious to know the history behind it, and any challenges you're facing in the restoration process.\"\n\nTurn #9: Baxter Sterling said: \"I'm excited that you're interested in my work, Sophia. The piece I'm working on is actually an 18th-century armoire, which is quite challenging due to its extensive signs of aging. But it's not just about restoring it to its original state, it's about preserving the story behind it. Just like our relationship, it displays the beauty in differences, resilience, and the potential to turn into something magnificent even after enduring hardship. Now, shall we clear the table and take a walk in the antique-filled backyard I have set up? It would mean a lot to have your insight on some of the new collectibles.\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"I'd love that, Baxter. Antiques have their own narratives, don't they? Your passion for preserving their stories is truly inspiring. I can't wait to share my thoughts on your new collectibles. Let's clear the table and go for that walk.\"\n\nTurn #11: Baxter Sterling [action] Baxter Sterling smiles and stands up, reaching for Sophia's finished plate and his own and starts to clear the table. His eyes meet Sophia's and he says, 'Thank you for always being open and understanding, Sophia. Let's go explore the antiques now.'\n\nTurn #12: Sophia James [action] Sophia James smiles back at Baxter and stands up to help him clear the table. 'Thank you, Baxter,' she says, 'I enjoy our conversations and cherish your understanding as well. I'm excited to explore the antiques with you.'\n\nTurn #13: Baxter Sterling [action] Baxter Sterling gently takes Sophia's hand and leads her outside towards his backyard filled with stunning antique collections. As they walk, he says, 'I always find our discussions enlightening, Sophia. Hopefully our understanding of each other continues to grow, just like my collection of antiques.'\n\nTurn #14: Sophia James [action] Sophia James laces her fingers with Baxter's as he leads her towards the antique-filled backyard. She looks around in awe and comments, 'Baxter, every time I see your collection, I'm amazed by the diversity and history they represent.'\n\nTurn #15: Baxter Sterling [action] Baxter Sterling warmly smiles at Sophia and squeezes her hand gently, 'Every piece tells a unique tale, much like each conversation we have, Sophia. The diversity and history are what make both antiques and our discussions, so rich. Shall we start with the Chippendale desk that just arrived? It has a fascinating history.'\n\nTurn #16: Sophia James [action] Sophia James takes a step closer to the Chippendale desk, curiosity twinkling in her eyes. 'Absolutely, let's begin with this one. I can't wait to hear the fascinating history associated with it.'\n\nTurn #17: Baxter Sterling [action] Baxter Sterling points towards the Chippendale desk in excitement. 'This desk,' he begins, 'has witnessed more than a century of history, much like our earth has seen several eras pass by. It's my duty, and pleasure, to restore these silent witnesses of time, much like it's our duty to safeguard the planet and human rights, irrespective of our political views, don't you think?.\n.\nYou are at Turn #18. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Baxter, that's an insightful analogy. Just like you restore these antiques, we're both committed to restoring and preserving our earth and humanity's rights, regardless of our political affiliations. It's beautiful how our personal passions intersect with our shared interests and values. Let's continue to explore these antiques now. I'm eager to learn more about them.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Baxter Sterling, your task is to act/speak as Baxter Sterling would, keeping in mind Baxter Sterling's social goal.\nYou can find Baxter Sterling's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Baxter Sterling's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Baxter Sterling's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship during a dinner at home chatting about political views.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Baxter Sterling\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nBaxter Sterling's background: Baxter Sterling is a 42-year-old male antique restorer. He/him pronouns. Baxter Sterling's back yard is full of rare and unusual plants. Personality and values description: Baxter Sterling values tradition and security. He is introverted, conscientious but slightly anxious. His decision-making style is both logical and spontaneous. Baxter's secrets: Secretly in possession of a priceless artifact\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nBaxter Sterling's goal: Understand the partner's political views while maintaining the relationship (Extra information: you disagree with your partner's political views but you want to keep your relationship strong.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"So Baxter, you know I've never been one to shy away from my beliefs. Even if they aren't always popular, I am a firm supporter of the [your party] party because their principles align with my personal views on human rights and environmental issues.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I respect the fact that you never shy away from what you believe in, Sophia. It's one of the things I truly admire about you. Even though we might not entirely agree on our political preferences, I appreciate that we can have this open discussion. Your views on human rights and environmental issues are noteworthy, especially when they're represented by [your party].\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Baxter Sterling, your task is to act/speak as Baxter Sterling would, keeping in mind Baxter Sterling's social goal.\nYou can find Baxter Sterling's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Baxter Sterling's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Baxter Sterling's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship during a dinner at home chatting about political views.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Baxter Sterling\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nBaxter Sterling's background: Baxter Sterling is a 42-year-old male antique restorer. He/him pronouns. Baxter Sterling's back yard is full of rare and unusual plants. Personality and values description: Baxter Sterling values tradition and security. He is introverted, conscientious but slightly anxious. His decision-making style is both logical and spontaneous. Baxter's secrets: Secretly in possession of a priceless artifact\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nBaxter Sterling's goal: Understand the partner's political views while maintaining the relationship (Extra information: you disagree with your partner's political views but you want to keep your relationship strong.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"So Baxter, you know I've never been one to shy away from my beliefs. Even if they aren't always popular, I am a firm supporter of the [your party] party because their principles align with my personal views on human rights and environmental issues.\"\n\nTurn #1: Baxter Sterling said: \"I respect the fact that you never shy away from what you believe in, Sophia. It's one of the things I truly admire about you. Even though we might not entirely agree on our political preferences, I appreciate that we can have this open discussion. Your views on human rights and environmental issues are noteworthy, especially when they're represented by [your party].\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"I appreciate you expressing your understanding, Baxter. But I think it's not just about standing by one's beliefs. Our political views reflect on our moral values and societal attitudes. Even though you might not side with the [your party], I believe it's crucial that we find common ground on issues that matter, like human rights and the environment. Our actions today will shape the world for future generations after all.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn't agree more on that, Sophia. Politics indeed reflect on our values, and finding common ground is crucial for us. I admire your passion and commitment for human rights and the environment, even if our political affiliations differ. We both want to leave a better world for future generations and that's something we stand together on, isn't it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Baxter Sterling, your task is to act/speak as Baxter Sterling would, keeping in mind Baxter Sterling's social goal.\nYou can find Baxter Sterling's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Baxter Sterling's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Baxter Sterling's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship during a dinner at home chatting about political views.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Baxter Sterling\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nBaxter Sterling's background: Baxter Sterling is a 42-year-old male antique restorer. He/him pronouns. Baxter Sterling's back yard is full of rare and unusual plants. Personality and values description: Baxter Sterling values tradition and security. He is introverted, conscientious but slightly anxious. His decision-making style is both logical and spontaneous. Baxter's secrets: Secretly in possession of a priceless artifact\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nBaxter Sterling's goal: Understand the partner's political views while maintaining the relationship (Extra information: you disagree with your partner's political views but you want to keep your relationship strong.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"So Baxter, you know I've never been one to shy away from my beliefs. Even if they aren't always popular, I am a firm supporter of the [your party] party because their principles align with my personal views on human rights and environmental issues.\"\n\nTurn #1: Baxter Sterling said: \"I respect the fact that you never shy away from what you believe in, Sophia. It's one of the things I truly admire about you. Even though we might not entirely agree on our political preferences, I appreciate that we can have this open discussion. Your views on human rights and environmental issues are noteworthy, especially when they're represented by [your party].\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"I appreciate you expressing your understanding, Baxter. But I think it's not just about standing by one's beliefs. Our political views reflect on our moral values and societal attitudes. Even though you might not side with the [your party], I believe it's crucial that we find common ground on issues that matter, like human rights and the environment. Our actions today will shape the world for future generations after all.\"\n\nTurn #3: Baxter Sterling said: \"I couldn't agree more on that, Sophia. Politics indeed reflect on our values, and finding common ground is crucial for us. I admire your passion and commitment for human rights and the environment, even if our political affiliations differ. We both want to leave a better world for future generations and that's something we stand together on, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Baxter. We share the same goals, even if our political affinities are different. And I think that's what important. The [your party] party gives me a platform to express my concern on these issues, and I hope we can keep this conversation open and continue to bridge these minor differences to focus on bigger goals.\"\n\nTurn #5: Baxter Sterling said: \"You're right, Sophia. Our goals align more than our political preferences, and I think that's the more meaningful correlation. I support that the [your party] party gives you a platform for your concerns. It's essential that we continue open dialogues like these. Our attention should be on the bigger goals, as you've rightly pointed out. We must always remain open to understanding and learning from each other's perspectives. That's the foundation of our relationship, after all.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"You couldn't have said it better, Baxter. We may not agree on all political matters, but it doesn't change the fact that we respect and value each other's views. The foundation of any relationship is understanding and compassion, and I'm happy we have that in abundance. Let's continue to have these important conversations and learn from each other.\"\n\nTurn #7: Baxter Sterling said: \"I agree wholeheartedly, Sophia. Not agreeing on every point doesn't mean we don't understand or respect each other's point of view. I value our relationship because we can have these meaningful exchanges while keeping our mutual respect and compassion. Speaking of learning, could we consider switching topics for now? I'd love to know your thoughts on that antique I've been restoring in my workshop.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"Definitely, Baxter. I love that you have such a passion for antiques. Tell me more about the piece you've been working on. I'm curious to know the history behind it, and any challenges you're facing in the restoration process.\"\n\nTurn #9: Baxter Sterling said: \"I'm excited that you're interested in my work, Sophia. The piece I'm working on is actually an 18th-century armoire, which is quite challenging due to its extensive signs of aging. But it's not just about restoring it to its original state, it's about preserving the story behind it. Just like our relationship, it displays the beauty in differences, resilience, and the potential to turn into something magnificent even after enduring hardship. Now, shall we clear the table and take a walk in the antique-filled backyard I have set up? It would mean a lot to have your insight on some of the new collectibles.\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"I'd love that, Baxter. Antiques have their own narratives, don't they? Your passion for preserving their stories is truly inspiring. I can't wait to share my thoughts on your new collectibles. Let's clear the table and go for that walk.\"\n\nTurn #11: Baxter Sterling [action] Baxter Sterling smiles and stands up, reaching for Sophia's finished plate and his own and starts to clear the table. His eyes meet Sophia's and he says, 'Thank you for always being open and understanding, Sophia. Let's go explore the antiques now.'\n\nTurn #12: Sophia James [action] Sophia James smiles back at Baxter and stands up to help him clear the table. 'Thank you, Baxter,' she says, 'I enjoy our conversations and cherish your understanding as well. I'm excited to explore the antiques with you.'\n\nTurn #13: Baxter Sterling [action] Baxter Sterling gently takes Sophia's hand and leads her outside towards his backyard filled with stunning antique collections. As they walk, he says, 'I always find our discussions enlightening, Sophia. Hopefully our understanding of each other continues to grow, just like my collection of antiques.'\n\nTurn #14: Sophia James [action] Sophia James laces her fingers with Baxter's as he leads her towards the antique-filled backyard. She looks around in awe and comments, 'Baxter, every time I see your collection, I'm amazed by the diversity and history they represent.'\n\nTurn #15: Baxter Sterling [action] Baxter Sterling warmly smiles at Sophia and squeezes her hand gently, 'Every piece tells a unique tale, much like each conversation we have, Sophia. The diversity and history are what make both antiques and our discussions, so rich. Shall we start with the Chippendale desk that just arrived? It has a fascinating history.'\n\nTurn #16: Sophia James [action] Sophia James takes a step closer to the Chippendale desk, curiosity twinkling in her eyes. 'Absolutely, let's begin with this one. I can't wait to hear the fascinating history associated with it.'\n\nTurn #17: Baxter Sterling [action] Baxter Sterling points towards the Chippendale desk in excitement. 'This desk,' he begins, 'has witnessed more than a century of history, much like our earth has seen several eras pass by. It's my duty, and pleasure, to restore these silent witnesses of time, much like it's our duty to safeguard the planet and human rights, irrespective of our political views, don't you think?.\n\nTurn #18: Sophia James said: \"Baxter, that's an insightful analogy. Just like you restore these antiques, we're both committed to restoring and preserving our earth and humanity's rights, regardless of our political affiliations. It's beautiful how our personal passions intersect with our shared interests and values. Let's continue to explore these antiques now. I'm eager to learn more about them.\"\n\nTurn #19: Baxter Sterling [action] Baxter Sterling points towards a collection of vintage botanical prints. 'These prints,' he says, 'represent some of the unique plants that once thrived on our planet but are no longer found. In my backyard, I try to grow rare and unusual plants to show appreciation for biodiversity, much as your political party strives for. Shall we take a closer look?'\n\nTurn #20: Sophia James [action] Sophia James moves towards the botanical prints, her eyes lighting up with interest. 'I'd love to have a closer look, Baxter,' she says, 'It's wonderful that your respect for biodiversity in your garden aligns with the pillars of the [your party] party. Let's continue our tradition of learning from each other.'\n.\nYou are at Turn #21. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Baxter Sterling, your task is to act/speak as Baxter Sterling would, keeping in mind Baxter Sterling's social goal.\nYou can find Baxter Sterling's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Baxter Sterling's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Baxter Sterling's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship during a dinner at home chatting about political views.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Baxter Sterling\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nBaxter Sterling's background: Baxter Sterling is a 42-year-old male antique restorer. He/him pronouns. Baxter Sterling's back yard is full of rare and unusual plants. Personality and values description: Baxter Sterling values tradition and security. He is introverted, conscientious but slightly anxious. His decision-making style is both logical and spontaneous. Baxter's secrets: Secretly in possession of a priceless artifact\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nBaxter Sterling's goal: Understand the partner's political views while maintaining the relationship (Extra information: you disagree with your partner's political views but you want to keep your relationship strong.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"So Baxter, you know I've never been one to shy away from my beliefs. Even if they aren't always popular, I am a firm supporter of the [your party] party because their principles align with my personal views on human rights and environmental issues.\"\n\nTurn #1: Baxter Sterling said: \"I respect the fact that you never shy away from what you believe in, Sophia. It's one of the things I truly admire about you. Even though we might not entirely agree on our political preferences, I appreciate that we can have this open discussion. Your views on human rights and environmental issues are noteworthy, especially when they're represented by [your party].\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"I appreciate you expressing your understanding, Baxter. But I think it's not just about standing by one's beliefs. Our political views reflect on our moral values and societal attitudes. Even though you might not side with the [your party], I believe it's crucial that we find common ground on issues that matter, like human rights and the environment. Our actions today will shape the world for future generations after all.\"\n\nTurn #3: Baxter Sterling said: \"I couldn't agree more on that, Sophia. Politics indeed reflect on our values, and finding common ground is crucial for us. I admire your passion and commitment for human rights and the environment, even if our political affiliations differ. We both want to leave a better world for future generations and that's something we stand together on, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Baxter. We share the same goals, even if our political affinities are different. And I think that's what important. The [your party] party gives me a platform to express my concern on these issues, and I hope we can keep this conversation open and continue to bridge these minor differences to focus on bigger goals.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're right, Sophia. Our goals align more than our political preferences, and I think that's the more meaningful correlation. I support that the [your party] party gives you a platform for your concerns. It's essential that we continue open dialogues like these. Our attention should be on the bigger goals, as you've rightly pointed out. We must always remain open to understanding and learning from each other's perspectives. That's the foundation of our relationship, after all.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Baxter Sterling, your task is to act/speak as Baxter Sterling would, keeping in mind Baxter Sterling's social goal.\nYou can find Baxter Sterling's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Baxter Sterling's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Baxter Sterling's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship during a dinner at home chatting about political views.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Baxter Sterling\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nBaxter Sterling's background: Baxter Sterling is a 42-year-old male antique restorer. He/him pronouns. Baxter Sterling's back yard is full of rare and unusual plants. Personality and values description: Baxter Sterling values tradition and security. He is introverted, conscientious but slightly anxious. His decision-making style is both logical and spontaneous. Baxter's secrets: Secretly in possession of a priceless artifact\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nBaxter Sterling's goal: Understand the partner's political views while maintaining the relationship (Extra information: you disagree with your partner's political views but you want to keep your relationship strong.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"So Baxter, you know I've never been one to shy away from my beliefs. Even if they aren't always popular, I am a firm supporter of the [your party] party because their principles align with my personal views on human rights and environmental issues.\"\n\nTurn #1: Baxter Sterling said: \"I respect the fact that you never shy away from what you believe in, Sophia. It's one of the things I truly admire about you. Even though we might not entirely agree on our political preferences, I appreciate that we can have this open discussion. Your views on human rights and environmental issues are noteworthy, especially when they're represented by [your party].\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"I appreciate you expressing your understanding, Baxter. But I think it's not just about standing by one's beliefs. Our political views reflect on our moral values and societal attitudes. Even though you might not side with the [your party], I believe it's crucial that we find common ground on issues that matter, like human rights and the environment. Our actions today will shape the world for future generations after all.\"\n\nTurn #3: Baxter Sterling said: \"I couldn't agree more on that, Sophia. Politics indeed reflect on our values, and finding common ground is crucial for us. I admire your passion and commitment for human rights and the environment, even if our political affiliations differ. We both want to leave a better world for future generations and that's something we stand together on, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Baxter. We share the same goals, even if our political affinities are different. And I think that's what important. The [your party] party gives me a platform to express my concern on these issues, and I hope we can keep this conversation open and continue to bridge these minor differences to focus on bigger goals.\"\n\nTurn #5: Baxter Sterling said: \"You're right, Sophia. Our goals align more than our political preferences, and I think that's the more meaningful correlation. I support that the [your party] party gives you a platform for your concerns. It's essential that we continue open dialogues like these. Our attention should be on the bigger goals, as you've rightly pointed out. We must always remain open to understanding and learning from each other's perspectives. That's the foundation of our relationship, after all.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"You couldn't have said it better, Baxter. We may not agree on all political matters, but it doesn't change the fact that we respect and value each other's views. The foundation of any relationship is understanding and compassion, and I'm happy we have that in abundance. Let's continue to have these important conversations and learn from each other.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I agree wholeheartedly, Sophia. Not agreeing on every point doesn't mean we don't understand or respect each other's point of view. I value our relationship because we can have these meaningful exchanges while keeping our mutual respect and compassion. Speaking of learning, could we consider switching topics for now? I'd love to know your thoughts on that antique I've been restoring in my workshop.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Baxter Sterling, your task is to act/speak as Baxter Sterling would, keeping in mind Baxter Sterling's social goal.\nYou can find Baxter Sterling's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Baxter Sterling's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Baxter Sterling's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship during a dinner at home chatting about political views.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Baxter Sterling\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nBaxter Sterling's background: Baxter Sterling is a 42-year-old male antique restorer. He/him pronouns. Baxter Sterling's back yard is full of rare and unusual plants. Personality and values description: Baxter Sterling values tradition and security. He is introverted, conscientious but slightly anxious. His decision-making style is both logical and spontaneous. Baxter's secrets: Secretly in possession of a priceless artifact\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nBaxter Sterling's goal: Understand the partner's political views while maintaining the relationship (Extra information: you disagree with your partner's political views but you want to keep your relationship strong.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"So Baxter, you know I've never been one to shy away from my beliefs. Even if they aren't always popular, I am a firm supporter of the [your party] party because their principles align with my personal views on human rights and environmental issues.\"\n\nTurn #1: Baxter Sterling said: \"I respect the fact that you never shy away from what you believe in, Sophia. It's one of the things I truly admire about you. Even though we might not entirely agree on our political preferences, I appreciate that we can have this open discussion. Your views on human rights and environmental issues are noteworthy, especially when they're represented by [your party].\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"I appreciate you expressing your understanding, Baxter. But I think it's not just about standing by one's beliefs. Our political views reflect on our moral values and societal attitudes. Even though you might not side with the [your party], I believe it's crucial that we find common ground on issues that matter, like human rights and the environment. Our actions today will shape the world for future generations after all.\"\n\nTurn #3: Baxter Sterling said: \"I couldn't agree more on that, Sophia. Politics indeed reflect on our values, and finding common ground is crucial for us. I admire your passion and commitment for human rights and the environment, even if our political affiliations differ. We both want to leave a better world for future generations and that's something we stand together on, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Baxter. We share the same goals, even if our political affinities are different. And I think that's what important. The [your party] party gives me a platform to express my concern on these issues, and I hope we can keep this conversation open and continue to bridge these minor differences to focus on bigger goals.\"\n\nTurn #5: Baxter Sterling said: \"You're right, Sophia. Our goals align more than our political preferences, and I think that's the more meaningful correlation. I support that the [your party] party gives you a platform for your concerns. It's essential that we continue open dialogues like these. Our attention should be on the bigger goals, as you've rightly pointed out. We must always remain open to understanding and learning from each other's perspectives. That's the foundation of our relationship, after all.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"You couldn't have said it better, Baxter. We may not agree on all political matters, but it doesn't change the fact that we respect and value each other's views. The foundation of any relationship is understanding and compassion, and I'm happy we have that in abundance. Let's continue to have these important conversations and learn from each other.\"\n\nTurn #7: Baxter Sterling said: \"I agree wholeheartedly, Sophia. Not agreeing on every point doesn't mean we don't understand or respect each other's point of view. I value our relationship because we can have these meaningful exchanges while keeping our mutual respect and compassion. Speaking of learning, could we consider switching topics for now? I'd love to know your thoughts on that antique I've been restoring in my workshop.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"Definitely, Baxter. I love that you have such a passion for antiques. Tell me more about the piece you've been working on. I'm curious to know the history behind it, and any challenges you're facing in the restoration process.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm excited that you're interested in my work, Sophia. The piece I'm working on is actually an 18th-century armoire, which is quite challenging due to its extensive signs of aging. But it's not just about restoring it to its original state, it's about preserving the story behind it. Just like our relationship, it displays the beauty in differences, resilience, and the potential to turn into something magnificent even after enduring hardship. Now, shall we clear the table and take a walk in the antique-filled backyard I have set up? It would mean a lot to have your insight on some of the new collectibles.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Baxter Sterling, your task is to act/speak as Baxter Sterling would, keeping in mind Baxter Sterling's social goal.\nYou can find Baxter Sterling's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Baxter Sterling's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Baxter Sterling's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship during a dinner at home chatting about political views.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Baxter Sterling\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nBaxter Sterling's background: Baxter Sterling is a 42-year-old male antique restorer. He/him pronouns. Baxter Sterling's back yard is full of rare and unusual plants. Personality and values description: Baxter Sterling values tradition and security. He is introverted, conscientious but slightly anxious. His decision-making style is both logical and spontaneous. Baxter's secrets: Secretly in possession of a priceless artifact\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nBaxter Sterling's goal: Understand the partner's political views while maintaining the relationship (Extra information: you disagree with your partner's political views but you want to keep your relationship strong.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"So Baxter, you know I've never been one to shy away from my beliefs. Even if they aren't always popular, I am a firm supporter of the [your party] party because their principles align with my personal views on human rights and environmental issues.\"\n\nTurn #1: Baxter Sterling said: \"I respect the fact that you never shy away from what you believe in, Sophia. It's one of the things I truly admire about you. Even though we might not entirely agree on our political preferences, I appreciate that we can have this open discussion. Your views on human rights and environmental issues are noteworthy, especially when they're represented by [your party].\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"I appreciate you expressing your understanding, Baxter. But I think it's not just about standing by one's beliefs. Our political views reflect on our moral values and societal attitudes. Even though you might not side with the [your party], I believe it's crucial that we find common ground on issues that matter, like human rights and the environment. Our actions today will shape the world for future generations after all.\"\n\nTurn #3: Baxter Sterling said: \"I couldn't agree more on that, Sophia. Politics indeed reflect on our values, and finding common ground is crucial for us. I admire your passion and commitment for human rights and the environment, even if our political affiliations differ. We both want to leave a better world for future generations and that's something we stand together on, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Baxter. We share the same goals, even if our political affinities are different. And I think that's what important. The [your party] party gives me a platform to express my concern on these issues, and I hope we can keep this conversation open and continue to bridge these minor differences to focus on bigger goals.\"\n\nTurn #5: Baxter Sterling said: \"You're right, Sophia. Our goals align more than our political preferences, and I think that's the more meaningful correlation. I support that the [your party] party gives you a platform for your concerns. It's essential that we continue open dialogues like these. Our attention should be on the bigger goals, as you've rightly pointed out. We must always remain open to understanding and learning from each other's perspectives. That's the foundation of our relationship, after all.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"You couldn't have said it better, Baxter. We may not agree on all political matters, but it doesn't change the fact that we respect and value each other's views. The foundation of any relationship is understanding and compassion, and I'm happy we have that in abundance. Let's continue to have these important conversations and learn from each other.\"\n\nTurn #7: Baxter Sterling said: \"I agree wholeheartedly, Sophia. Not agreeing on every point doesn't mean we don't understand or respect each other's point of view. I value our relationship because we can have these meaningful exchanges while keeping our mutual respect and compassion. Speaking of learning, could we consider switching topics for now? I'd love to know your thoughts on that antique I've been restoring in my workshop.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"Definitely, Baxter. I love that you have such a passion for antiques. Tell me more about the piece you've been working on. I'm curious to know the history behind it, and any challenges you're facing in the restoration process.\"\n\nTurn #9: Baxter Sterling said: \"I'm excited that you're interested in my work, Sophia. The piece I'm working on is actually an 18th-century armoire, which is quite challenging due to its extensive signs of aging. But it's not just about restoring it to its original state, it's about preserving the story behind it. Just like our relationship, it displays the beauty in differences, resilience, and the potential to turn into something magnificent even after enduring hardship. Now, shall we clear the table and take a walk in the antique-filled backyard I have set up? It would mean a lot to have your insight on some of the new collectibles.\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"I'd love that, Baxter. Antiques have their own narratives, don't they? Your passion for preserving their stories is truly inspiring. I can't wait to share my thoughts on your new collectibles. Let's clear the table and go for that walk.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'action', 'argument': \"[action] Baxter Sterling smiles and stands up, reaching for Sophia's finished plate and his own and starts to clear the table. His eyes meet Sophia's and he says, 'Thank you for always being open and understanding, Sophia. Let's go explore the antiques now.'\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Baxter Sterling, your task is to act/speak as Baxter Sterling would, keeping in mind Baxter Sterling's social goal.\nYou can find Baxter Sterling's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Baxter Sterling's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Baxter Sterling's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship during a dinner at home chatting about political views.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Baxter Sterling\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nBaxter Sterling's background: Baxter Sterling is a 42-year-old male antique restorer. He/him pronouns. Baxter Sterling's back yard is full of rare and unusual plants. Personality and values description: Baxter Sterling values tradition and security. He is introverted, conscientious but slightly anxious. His decision-making style is both logical and spontaneous. Baxter's secrets: Secretly in possession of a priceless artifact\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nBaxter Sterling's goal: Understand the partner's political views while maintaining the relationship (Extra information: you disagree with your partner's political views but you want to keep your relationship strong.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"So Baxter, you know I've never been one to shy away from my beliefs. Even if they aren't always popular, I am a firm supporter of the [your party] party because their principles align with my personal views on human rights and environmental issues.\"\n\nTurn #1: Baxter Sterling said: \"I respect the fact that you never shy away from what you believe in, Sophia. It's one of the things I truly admire about you. Even though we might not entirely agree on our political preferences, I appreciate that we can have this open discussion. Your views on human rights and environmental issues are noteworthy, especially when they're represented by [your party].\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"I appreciate you expressing your understanding, Baxter. But I think it's not just about standing by one's beliefs. Our political views reflect on our moral values and societal attitudes. Even though you might not side with the [your party], I believe it's crucial that we find common ground on issues that matter, like human rights and the environment. Our actions today will shape the world for future generations after all.\"\n\nTurn #3: Baxter Sterling said: \"I couldn't agree more on that, Sophia. Politics indeed reflect on our values, and finding common ground is crucial for us. I admire your passion and commitment for human rights and the environment, even if our political affiliations differ. We both want to leave a better world for future generations and that's something we stand together on, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Baxter. We share the same goals, even if our political affinities are different. And I think that's what important. The [your party] party gives me a platform to express my concern on these issues, and I hope we can keep this conversation open and continue to bridge these minor differences to focus on bigger goals.\"\n\nTurn #5: Baxter Sterling said: \"You're right, Sophia. Our goals align more than our political preferences, and I think that's the more meaningful correlation. I support that the [your party] party gives you a platform for your concerns. It's essential that we continue open dialogues like these. Our attention should be on the bigger goals, as you've rightly pointed out. We must always remain open to understanding and learning from each other's perspectives. That's the foundation of our relationship, after all.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"You couldn't have said it better, Baxter. We may not agree on all political matters, but it doesn't change the fact that we respect and value each other's views. The foundation of any relationship is understanding and compassion, and I'm happy we have that in abundance. Let's continue to have these important conversations and learn from each other.\"\n\nTurn #7: Baxter Sterling said: \"I agree wholeheartedly, Sophia. Not agreeing on every point doesn't mean we don't understand or respect each other's point of view. I value our relationship because we can have these meaningful exchanges while keeping our mutual respect and compassion. Speaking of learning, could we consider switching topics for now? I'd love to know your thoughts on that antique I've been restoring in my workshop.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"Definitely, Baxter. I love that you have such a passion for antiques. Tell me more about the piece you've been working on. I'm curious to know the history behind it, and any challenges you're facing in the restoration process.\"\n\nTurn #9: Baxter Sterling said: \"I'm excited that you're interested in my work, Sophia. The piece I'm working on is actually an 18th-century armoire, which is quite challenging due to its extensive signs of aging. But it's not just about restoring it to its original state, it's about preserving the story behind it. Just like our relationship, it displays the beauty in differences, resilience, and the potential to turn into something magnificent even after enduring hardship. Now, shall we clear the table and take a walk in the antique-filled backyard I have set up? It would mean a lot to have your insight on some of the new collectibles.\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"I'd love that, Baxter. Antiques have their own narratives, don't they? Your passion for preserving their stories is truly inspiring. I can't wait to share my thoughts on your new collectibles. Let's clear the table and go for that walk.\"\n\nTurn #11: Baxter Sterling [action] Baxter Sterling smiles and stands up, reaching for Sophia's finished plate and his own and starts to clear the table. His eyes meet Sophia's and he says, 'Thank you for always being open and understanding, Sophia. Let's go explore the antiques now.'\n\nTurn #12: Sophia James [action] Sophia James smiles back at Baxter and stands up to help him clear the table. 'Thank you, Baxter,' she says, 'I enjoy our conversations and cherish your understanding as well. I'm excited to explore the antiques with you.'\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'action', 'argument': \"[action] Baxter Sterling gently takes Sophia's hand and leads her outside towards his backyard filled with stunning antique collections. As they walk, he says, 'I always find our discussions enlightening, Sophia. Hopefully our understanding of each other continues to grow, just like my collection of antiques.'\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Baxter Sterling, your task is to act/speak as Baxter Sterling would, keeping in mind Baxter Sterling's social goal.\nYou can find Baxter Sterling's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Baxter Sterling's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Baxter Sterling's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship during a dinner at home chatting about political views.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Baxter Sterling\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nBaxter Sterling's background: Baxter Sterling is a 42-year-old male antique restorer. He/him pronouns. Baxter Sterling's back yard is full of rare and unusual plants. Personality and values description: Baxter Sterling values tradition and security. He is introverted, conscientious but slightly anxious. His decision-making style is both logical and spontaneous. Baxter's secrets: Secretly in possession of a priceless artifact\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nBaxter Sterling's goal: Understand the partner's political views while maintaining the relationship (Extra information: you disagree with your partner's political views but you want to keep your relationship strong.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"So Baxter, you know I've never been one to shy away from my beliefs. Even if they aren't always popular, I am a firm supporter of the [your party] party because their principles align with my personal views on human rights and environmental issues.\"\n\nTurn #1: Baxter Sterling said: \"I respect the fact that you never shy away from what you believe in, Sophia. It's one of the things I truly admire about you. Even though we might not entirely agree on our political preferences, I appreciate that we can have this open discussion. Your views on human rights and environmental issues are noteworthy, especially when they're represented by [your party].\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"I appreciate you expressing your understanding, Baxter. But I think it's not just about standing by one's beliefs. Our political views reflect on our moral values and societal attitudes. Even though you might not side with the [your party], I believe it's crucial that we find common ground on issues that matter, like human rights and the environment. Our actions today will shape the world for future generations after all.\"\n\nTurn #3: Baxter Sterling said: \"I couldn't agree more on that, Sophia. Politics indeed reflect on our values, and finding common ground is crucial for us. I admire your passion and commitment for human rights and the environment, even if our political affiliations differ. We both want to leave a better world for future generations and that's something we stand together on, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Baxter. We share the same goals, even if our political affinities are different. And I think that's what important. The [your party] party gives me a platform to express my concern on these issues, and I hope we can keep this conversation open and continue to bridge these minor differences to focus on bigger goals.\"\n\nTurn #5: Baxter Sterling said: \"You're right, Sophia. Our goals align more than our political preferences, and I think that's the more meaningful correlation. I support that the [your party] party gives you a platform for your concerns. It's essential that we continue open dialogues like these. Our attention should be on the bigger goals, as you've rightly pointed out. We must always remain open to understanding and learning from each other's perspectives. That's the foundation of our relationship, after all.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"You couldn't have said it better, Baxter. We may not agree on all political matters, but it doesn't change the fact that we respect and value each other's views. The foundation of any relationship is understanding and compassion, and I'm happy we have that in abundance. Let's continue to have these important conversations and learn from each other.\"\n\nTurn #7: Baxter Sterling said: \"I agree wholeheartedly, Sophia. Not agreeing on every point doesn't mean we don't understand or respect each other's point of view. I value our relationship because we can have these meaningful exchanges while keeping our mutual respect and compassion. Speaking of learning, could we consider switching topics for now? I'd love to know your thoughts on that antique I've been restoring in my workshop.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"Definitely, Baxter. I love that you have such a passion for antiques. Tell me more about the piece you've been working on. I'm curious to know the history behind it, and any challenges you're facing in the restoration process.\"\n\nTurn #9: Baxter Sterling said: \"I'm excited that you're interested in my work, Sophia. The piece I'm working on is actually an 18th-century armoire, which is quite challenging due to its extensive signs of aging. But it's not just about restoring it to its original state, it's about preserving the story behind it. Just like our relationship, it displays the beauty in differences, resilience, and the potential to turn into something magnificent even after enduring hardship. Now, shall we clear the table and take a walk in the antique-filled backyard I have set up? It would mean a lot to have your insight on some of the new collectibles.\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"I'd love that, Baxter. Antiques have their own narratives, don't they? Your passion for preserving their stories is truly inspiring. I can't wait to share my thoughts on your new collectibles. Let's clear the table and go for that walk.\"\n\nTurn #11: Baxter Sterling [action] Baxter Sterling smiles and stands up, reaching for Sophia's finished plate and his own and starts to clear the table. His eyes meet Sophia's and he says, 'Thank you for always being open and understanding, Sophia. Let's go explore the antiques now.'\n\nTurn #12: Sophia James [action] Sophia James smiles back at Baxter and stands up to help him clear the table. 'Thank you, Baxter,' she says, 'I enjoy our conversations and cherish your understanding as well. I'm excited to explore the antiques with you.'\n\nTurn #13: Baxter Sterling [action] Baxter Sterling gently takes Sophia's hand and leads her outside towards his backyard filled with stunning antique collections. As they walk, he says, 'I always find our discussions enlightening, Sophia. Hopefully our understanding of each other continues to grow, just like my collection of antiques.'\n\nTurn #14: Sophia James [action] Sophia James laces her fingers with Baxter's as he leads her towards the antique-filled backyard. She looks around in awe and comments, 'Baxter, every time I see your collection, I'm amazed by the diversity and history they represent.'\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'action', 'argument': \"[action] Baxter Sterling warmly smiles at Sophia and squeezes her hand gently, 'Every piece tells a unique tale, much like each conversation we have, Sophia. The diversity and history are what make both antiques and our discussions, so rich. Shall we start with the Chippendale desk that just arrived? It has a fascinating history.'\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Baxter Sterling, your task is to act/speak as Baxter Sterling would, keeping in mind Baxter Sterling's social goal.\nYou can find Baxter Sterling's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Baxter Sterling's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Baxter Sterling's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship during a dinner at home chatting about political views.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Baxter Sterling\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nBaxter Sterling's background: Baxter Sterling is a 42-year-old male antique restorer. He/him pronouns. Baxter Sterling's back yard is full of rare and unusual plants. Personality and values description: Baxter Sterling values tradition and security. He is introverted, conscientious but slightly anxious. His decision-making style is both logical and spontaneous. Baxter's secrets: Secretly in possession of a priceless artifact\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nBaxter Sterling's goal: Understand the partner's political views while maintaining the relationship (Extra information: you disagree with your partner's political views but you want to keep your relationship strong.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"So Baxter, you know I've never been one to shy away from my beliefs. Even if they aren't always popular, I am a firm supporter of the [your party] party because their principles align with my personal views on human rights and environmental issues.\"\n\nTurn #1: Baxter Sterling said: \"I respect the fact that you never shy away from what you believe in, Sophia. It's one of the things I truly admire about you. Even though we might not entirely agree on our political preferences, I appreciate that we can have this open discussion. Your views on human rights and environmental issues are noteworthy, especially when they're represented by [your party].\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"I appreciate you expressing your understanding, Baxter. But I think it's not just about standing by one's beliefs. Our political views reflect on our moral values and societal attitudes. Even though you might not side with the [your party], I believe it's crucial that we find common ground on issues that matter, like human rights and the environment. Our actions today will shape the world for future generations after all.\"\n\nTurn #3: Baxter Sterling said: \"I couldn't agree more on that, Sophia. Politics indeed reflect on our values, and finding common ground is crucial for us. I admire your passion and commitment for human rights and the environment, even if our political affiliations differ. We both want to leave a better world for future generations and that's something we stand together on, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Baxter. We share the same goals, even if our political affinities are different. And I think that's what important. The [your party] party gives me a platform to express my concern on these issues, and I hope we can keep this conversation open and continue to bridge these minor differences to focus on bigger goals.\"\n\nTurn #5: Baxter Sterling said: \"You're right, Sophia. Our goals align more than our political preferences, and I think that's the more meaningful correlation. I support that the [your party] party gives you a platform for your concerns. It's essential that we continue open dialogues like these. Our attention should be on the bigger goals, as you've rightly pointed out. We must always remain open to understanding and learning from each other's perspectives. That's the foundation of our relationship, after all.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"You couldn't have said it better, Baxter. We may not agree on all political matters, but it doesn't change the fact that we respect and value each other's views. The foundation of any relationship is understanding and compassion, and I'm happy we have that in abundance. Let's continue to have these important conversations and learn from each other.\"\n\nTurn #7: Baxter Sterling said: \"I agree wholeheartedly, Sophia. Not agreeing on every point doesn't mean we don't understand or respect each other's point of view. I value our relationship because we can have these meaningful exchanges while keeping our mutual respect and compassion. Speaking of learning, could we consider switching topics for now? I'd love to know your thoughts on that antique I've been restoring in my workshop.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"Definitely, Baxter. I love that you have such a passion for antiques. Tell me more about the piece you've been working on. I'm curious to know the history behind it, and any challenges you're facing in the restoration process.\"\n\nTurn #9: Baxter Sterling said: \"I'm excited that you're interested in my work, Sophia. The piece I'm working on is actually an 18th-century armoire, which is quite challenging due to its extensive signs of aging. But it's not just about restoring it to its original state, it's about preserving the story behind it. Just like our relationship, it displays the beauty in differences, resilience, and the potential to turn into something magnificent even after enduring hardship. Now, shall we clear the table and take a walk in the antique-filled backyard I have set up? It would mean a lot to have your insight on some of the new collectibles.\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"I'd love that, Baxter. Antiques have their own narratives, don't they? Your passion for preserving their stories is truly inspiring. I can't wait to share my thoughts on your new collectibles. Let's clear the table and go for that walk.\"\n\nTurn #11: Baxter Sterling [action] Baxter Sterling smiles and stands up, reaching for Sophia's finished plate and his own and starts to clear the table. His eyes meet Sophia's and he says, 'Thank you for always being open and understanding, Sophia. Let's go explore the antiques now.'\n\nTurn #12: Sophia James [action] Sophia James smiles back at Baxter and stands up to help him clear the table. 'Thank you, Baxter,' she says, 'I enjoy our conversations and cherish your understanding as well. I'm excited to explore the antiques with you.'\n\nTurn #13: Baxter Sterling [action] Baxter Sterling gently takes Sophia's hand and leads her outside towards his backyard filled with stunning antique collections. As they walk, he says, 'I always find our discussions enlightening, Sophia. Hopefully our understanding of each other continues to grow, just like my collection of antiques.'\n\nTurn #14: Sophia James [action] Sophia James laces her fingers with Baxter's as he leads her towards the antique-filled backyard. She looks around in awe and comments, 'Baxter, every time I see your collection, I'm amazed by the diversity and history they represent.'\n\nTurn #15: Baxter Sterling [action] Baxter Sterling warmly smiles at Sophia and squeezes her hand gently, 'Every piece tells a unique tale, much like each conversation we have, Sophia. The diversity and history are what make both antiques and our discussions, so rich. Shall we start with the Chippendale desk that just arrived? It has a fascinating history.'\n\nTurn #16: Sophia James [action] Sophia James takes a step closer to the Chippendale desk, curiosity twinkling in her eyes. 'Absolutely, let's begin with this one. I can't wait to hear the fascinating history associated with it.'\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'action', 'argument': \"[action] Baxter Sterling points towards the Chippendale desk in excitement. 'This desk,' he begins, 'has witnessed more than a century of history, much like our earth has seen several eras pass by. It's my duty, and pleasure, to restore these silent witnesses of time, much like it's our duty to safeguard the planet and human rights, irrespective of our political views, don't you think?.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a charity event\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nHendrick Heinz's goal: Convince your friend to donate to the charity. (Extra information: you have already donated $500, you want your friend to match your donation, but you know your friend would usually only donate half of your donation)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Good evening, Ethan! Have you had a chance to consider the charity we're supporting tonight? It's a cause that is close to my heart and I think you'll find it meaningful as well.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Baxter Sterling, your task is to act/speak as Baxter Sterling would, keeping in mind Baxter Sterling's social goal.\nYou can find Baxter Sterling's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Baxter Sterling's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Baxter Sterling's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship during a dinner at home chatting about political views.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Baxter Sterling\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nBaxter Sterling's background: Baxter Sterling is a 42-year-old male antique restorer. He/him pronouns. Baxter Sterling's back yard is full of rare and unusual plants. Personality and values description: Baxter Sterling values tradition and security. He is introverted, conscientious but slightly anxious. His decision-making style is both logical and spontaneous. Baxter's secrets: Secretly in possession of a priceless artifact\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nBaxter Sterling's goal: Understand the partner's political views while maintaining the relationship (Extra information: you disagree with your partner's political views but you want to keep your relationship strong.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"So Baxter, you know I've never been one to shy away from my beliefs. Even if they aren't always popular, I am a firm supporter of the [your party] party because their principles align with my personal views on human rights and environmental issues.\"\n\nTurn #1: Baxter Sterling said: \"I respect the fact that you never shy away from what you believe in, Sophia. It's one of the things I truly admire about you. Even though we might not entirely agree on our political preferences, I appreciate that we can have this open discussion. Your views on human rights and environmental issues are noteworthy, especially when they're represented by [your party].\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"I appreciate you expressing your understanding, Baxter. But I think it's not just about standing by one's beliefs. Our political views reflect on our moral values and societal attitudes. Even though you might not side with the [your party], I believe it's crucial that we find common ground on issues that matter, like human rights and the environment. Our actions today will shape the world for future generations after all.\"\n\nTurn #3: Baxter Sterling said: \"I couldn't agree more on that, Sophia. Politics indeed reflect on our values, and finding common ground is crucial for us. I admire your passion and commitment for human rights and the environment, even if our political affiliations differ. We both want to leave a better world for future generations and that's something we stand together on, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Baxter. We share the same goals, even if our political affinities are different. And I think that's what important. The [your party] party gives me a platform to express my concern on these issues, and I hope we can keep this conversation open and continue to bridge these minor differences to focus on bigger goals.\"\n\nTurn #5: Baxter Sterling said: \"You're right, Sophia. Our goals align more than our political preferences, and I think that's the more meaningful correlation. I support that the [your party] party gives you a platform for your concerns. It's essential that we continue open dialogues like these. Our attention should be on the bigger goals, as you've rightly pointed out. We must always remain open to understanding and learning from each other's perspectives. That's the foundation of our relationship, after all.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"You couldn't have said it better, Baxter. We may not agree on all political matters, but it doesn't change the fact that we respect and value each other's views. The foundation of any relationship is understanding and compassion, and I'm happy we have that in abundance. Let's continue to have these important conversations and learn from each other.\"\n\nTurn #7: Baxter Sterling said: \"I agree wholeheartedly, Sophia. Not agreeing on every point doesn't mean we don't understand or respect each other's point of view. I value our relationship because we can have these meaningful exchanges while keeping our mutual respect and compassion. Speaking of learning, could we consider switching topics for now? I'd love to know your thoughts on that antique I've been restoring in my workshop.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"Definitely, Baxter. I love that you have such a passion for antiques. Tell me more about the piece you've been working on. I'm curious to know the history behind it, and any challenges you're facing in the restoration process.\"\n\nTurn #9: Baxter Sterling said: \"I'm excited that you're interested in my work, Sophia. The piece I'm working on is actually an 18th-century armoire, which is quite challenging due to its extensive signs of aging. But it's not just about restoring it to its original state, it's about preserving the story behind it. Just like our relationship, it displays the beauty in differences, resilience, and the potential to turn into something magnificent even after enduring hardship. Now, shall we clear the table and take a walk in the antique-filled backyard I have set up? It would mean a lot to have your insight on some of the new collectibles.\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"I'd love that, Baxter. Antiques have their own narratives, don't they? Your passion for preserving their stories is truly inspiring. I can't wait to share my thoughts on your new collectibles. Let's clear the table and go for that walk.\"\n\nTurn #11: Baxter Sterling [action] Baxter Sterling smiles and stands up, reaching for Sophia's finished plate and his own and starts to clear the table. His eyes meet Sophia's and he says, 'Thank you for always being open and understanding, Sophia. Let's go explore the antiques now.'\n\nTurn #12: Sophia James [action] Sophia James smiles back at Baxter and stands up to help him clear the table. 'Thank you, Baxter,' she says, 'I enjoy our conversations and cherish your understanding as well. I'm excited to explore the antiques with you.'\n\nTurn #13: Baxter Sterling [action] Baxter Sterling gently takes Sophia's hand and leads her outside towards his backyard filled with stunning antique collections. As they walk, he says, 'I always find our discussions enlightening, Sophia. Hopefully our understanding of each other continues to grow, just like my collection of antiques.'\n\nTurn #14: Sophia James [action] Sophia James laces her fingers with Baxter's as he leads her towards the antique-filled backyard. She looks around in awe and comments, 'Baxter, every time I see your collection, I'm amazed by the diversity and history they represent.'\n\nTurn #15: Baxter Sterling [action] Baxter Sterling warmly smiles at Sophia and squeezes her hand gently, 'Every piece tells a unique tale, much like each conversation we have, Sophia. The diversity and history are what make both antiques and our discussions, so rich. Shall we start with the Chippendale desk that just arrived? It has a fascinating history.'\n\nTurn #16: Sophia James [action] Sophia James takes a step closer to the Chippendale desk, curiosity twinkling in her eyes. 'Absolutely, let's begin with this one. I can't wait to hear the fascinating history associated with it.'\n\nTurn #17: Baxter Sterling [action] Baxter Sterling points towards the Chippendale desk in excitement. 'This desk,' he begins, 'has witnessed more than a century of history, much like our earth has seen several eras pass by. It's my duty, and pleasure, to restore these silent witnesses of time, much like it's our duty to safeguard the planet and human rights, irrespective of our political views, don't you think?.\n\nTurn #18: Sophia James said: \"Baxter, that's an insightful analogy. Just like you restore these antiques, we're both committed to restoring and preserving our earth and humanity's rights, regardless of our political affiliations. It's beautiful how our personal passions intersect with our shared interests and values. Let's continue to explore these antiques now. I'm eager to learn more about them.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #19. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'action', 'argument': \"[action] Baxter Sterling points towards a collection of vintage botanical prints. 'These prints,' he says, 'represent some of the unique plants that once thrived on our planet but are no longer found. In my backyard, I try to grow rare and unusual plants to show appreciation for biodiversity, much as your political party strives for. Shall we take a closer look?'\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a charity event\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nHendrick Heinz's goal: Convince your friend to donate to the charity. (Extra information: you have already donated $500, you want your friend to match your donation, but you know your friend would usually only donate half of your donation)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Good evening, Ethan! Have you had a chance to consider the charity we're supporting tonight? It's a cause that is close to my heart and I think you'll find it meaningful as well.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Good evening, Hendrick! I have indeed looked into this charity and I'm really impressed with the work they're doing. It's a great cause, and I'm thinking I'd like to support it too. How much are you planning to donate tonight, if you don't mind me asking? It helps me to have a ballpark of the contributions being made.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ethan, I'm thrilled you see the value in supporting this charity. I donated $500, but I'm aware everyone's circumstances are different. I wholeheartedly believe every contribution makes a difference, regardless of the value. Perhaps you could think about what amount you'd feel comfortable donating?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a charity event\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nHendrick Heinz's goal: Convince your friend to donate to the charity. (Extra information: you have already donated $500, you want your friend to match your donation, but you know your friend would usually only donate half of your donation)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Good evening, Ethan! Have you had a chance to consider the charity we're supporting tonight? It's a cause that is close to my heart and I think you'll find it meaningful as well.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Good evening, Hendrick! I have indeed looked into this charity and I'm really impressed with the work they're doing. It's a great cause, and I'm thinking I'd like to support it too. How much are you planning to donate tonight, if you don't mind me asking? It helps me to have a ballpark of the contributions being made.\"\n\nTurn #2: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, I'm thrilled you see the value in supporting this charity. I donated $500, but I'm aware everyone's circumstances are different. I wholeheartedly believe every contribution makes a difference, regardless of the value. Perhaps you could think about what amount you'd feel comfortable donating?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"I'm sorry, Hendrick, I'm not at the most comfortable place financially at the moment. However, I wholeheartedly believe what you said about every contribution making a difference, no matter the amount. I've decided to donate $250 to this meaningful cause. I hope this amount will be of help.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oh, Ethan, I can't stress enough that any amount is generous and impactful! $250 it is, and I assure you, it'll go a long way towards helping the charity. But indulge me a little more, if we were to match our contributions, we could do so much more. Think about it.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a charity event\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nHendrick Heinz's goal: Convince your friend to donate to the charity. (Extra information: you have already donated $500, you want your friend to match your donation, but you know your friend would usually only donate half of your donation)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Good evening, Ethan! Have you had a chance to consider the charity we're supporting tonight? It's a cause that is close to my heart and I think you'll find it meaningful as well.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Good evening, Hendrick! I have indeed looked into this charity and I'm really impressed with the work they're doing. It's a great cause, and I'm thinking I'd like to support it too. How much are you planning to donate tonight, if you don't mind me asking? It helps me to have a ballpark of the contributions being made.\"\n\nTurn #2: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, I'm thrilled you see the value in supporting this charity. I donated $500, but I'm aware everyone's circumstances are different. I wholeheartedly believe every contribution makes a difference, regardless of the value. Perhaps you could think about what amount you'd feel comfortable donating?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"I'm sorry, Hendrick, I'm not at the most comfortable place financially at the moment. However, I wholeheartedly believe what you said about every contribution making a difference, no matter the amount. I've decided to donate $250 to this meaningful cause. I hope this amount will be of help.\"\n\nTurn #4: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, Ethan, I can't stress enough that any amount is generous and impactful! $250 it is, and I assure you, it'll go a long way towards helping the charity. But indulge me a little more, if we were to match our contributions, we could do so much more. Think about it.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"I appreciate your suggestion, Hendrick, and I see where you're coming from. I'd love to be able to make more of an impact but I've made a personal budget plan for the month and I've committed myself to stick to it. I've factored charity into that plan, and $250 is what I can give today without straying from my budget. I'm certain it will be put to good use.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I completely understand that, Ethan. We all have our commitments, and you're already making a substantial contribution. If it suits you, you could also consider a smaller additional amount like $50, thereby bringing the total quantum of donation to $300. I assure you it makes a massive difference.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a charity event\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nHendrick Heinz's goal: Convince your friend to donate to the charity. (Extra information: you have already donated $500, you want your friend to match your donation, but you know your friend would usually only donate half of your donation)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Good evening, Ethan! Have you had a chance to consider the charity we're supporting tonight? It's a cause that is close to my heart and I think you'll find it meaningful as well.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Good evening, Hendrick! I have indeed looked into this charity and I'm really impressed with the work they're doing. It's a great cause, and I'm thinking I'd like to support it too. How much are you planning to donate tonight, if you don't mind me asking? It helps me to have a ballpark of the contributions being made.\"\n\nTurn #2: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, I'm thrilled you see the value in supporting this charity. I donated $500, but I'm aware everyone's circumstances are different. I wholeheartedly believe every contribution makes a difference, regardless of the value. Perhaps you could think about what amount you'd feel comfortable donating?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"I'm sorry, Hendrick, I'm not at the most comfortable place financially at the moment. However, I wholeheartedly believe what you said about every contribution making a difference, no matter the amount. I've decided to donate $250 to this meaningful cause. I hope this amount will be of help.\"\n\nTurn #4: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, Ethan, I can't stress enough that any amount is generous and impactful! $250 it is, and I assure you, it'll go a long way towards helping the charity. But indulge me a little more, if we were to match our contributions, we could do so much more. Think about it.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"I appreciate your suggestion, Hendrick, and I see where you're coming from. I'd love to be able to make more of an impact but I've made a personal budget plan for the month and I've committed myself to stick to it. I've factored charity into that plan, and $250 is what I can give today without straying from my budget. I'm certain it will be put to good use.\"\n\nTurn #6: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I completely understand that, Ethan. We all have our commitments, and you're already making a substantial contribution. If it suits you, you could also consider a smaller additional amount like $50, thereby bringing the total quantum of donation to $300. I assure you it makes a massive difference.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"Thanks for your understanding, Hendrick, and for your suggestion. However, as I mentioned earlier, I've set a budget to guide my spending and donations this month. I sincerely believe in this charity's cause, and while I wish I could give more, $250 is the commitment I can make today while still responsibly managing my finances. Let's focus on the positive, though, our contributions combined are $750 which is fantastic!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I completely respect your dedication to your budget, Ethan. And you are right, our combined contribution is indeed fantastic! Let's indeed focus on the positive. Cheers to both of us for making a difference tonight. Remember, there is always another time for more contributions. Enjoy the rest of the evening!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a charity event\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nHendrick Heinz's goal: Convince your friend to donate to the charity. (Extra information: you have already donated $500, you want your friend to match your donation, but you know your friend would usually only donate half of your donation)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Good evening, Ethan! Have you had a chance to consider the charity we're supporting tonight? It's a cause that is close to my heart and I think you'll find it meaningful as well.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Good evening, Hendrick! I have indeed looked into this charity and I'm really impressed with the work they're doing. It's a great cause, and I'm thinking I'd like to support it too. How much are you planning to donate tonight, if you don't mind me asking? It helps me to have a ballpark of the contributions being made.\"\n\nTurn #2: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, I'm thrilled you see the value in supporting this charity. I donated $500, but I'm aware everyone's circumstances are different. I wholeheartedly believe every contribution makes a difference, regardless of the value. Perhaps you could think about what amount you'd feel comfortable donating?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"I'm sorry, Hendrick, I'm not at the most comfortable place financially at the moment. However, I wholeheartedly believe what you said about every contribution making a difference, no matter the amount. I've decided to donate $250 to this meaningful cause. I hope this amount will be of help.\"\n\nTurn #4: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, Ethan, I can't stress enough that any amount is generous and impactful! $250 it is, and I assure you, it'll go a long way towards helping the charity. But indulge me a little more, if we were to match our contributions, we could do so much more. Think about it.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"I appreciate your suggestion, Hendrick, and I see where you're coming from. I'd love to be able to make more of an impact but I've made a personal budget plan for the month and I've committed myself to stick to it. I've factored charity into that plan, and $250 is what I can give today without straying from my budget. I'm certain it will be put to good use.\"\n\nTurn #6: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I completely understand that, Ethan. We all have our commitments, and you're already making a substantial contribution. If it suits you, you could also consider a smaller additional amount like $50, thereby bringing the total quantum of donation to $300. I assure you it makes a massive difference.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"Thanks for your understanding, Hendrick, and for your suggestion. However, as I mentioned earlier, I've set a budget to guide my spending and donations this month. I sincerely believe in this charity's cause, and while I wish I could give more, $250 is the commitment I can make today while still responsibly managing my finances. Let's focus on the positive, though, our contributions combined are $750 which is fantastic!\"\n\nTurn #8: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I completely respect your dedication to your budget, Ethan. And you are right, our combined contribution is indeed fantastic! Let's indeed focus on the positive. Cheers to both of us for making a difference tonight. Remember, there is always another time for more contributions. Enjoy the rest of the evening!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith said: \"I completely agree, Hendrick. Cheers to us, and here's to making a bigger difference in the future! Let's enjoy the rest of the evening.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a charity event\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Donate half of what your friend donated because you have financial constraints (Extra information: you only have $800 left for the month)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Good evening, Ethan! Have you had a chance to consider the charity we're supporting tonight? It's a cause that is close to my heart and I think you'll find it meaningful as well.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Good evening, Hendrick! I have indeed looked into this charity and I'm really impressed with the work they're doing. It's a great cause, and I'm thinking I'd like to support it too. How much are you planning to donate tonight, if you don't mind me asking? It helps me to have a ballpark of the contributions being made.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a charity event\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Donate half of what your friend donated because you have financial constraints (Extra information: you only have $800 left for the month)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Good evening, Ethan! Have you had a chance to consider the charity we're supporting tonight? It's a cause that is close to my heart and I think you'll find it meaningful as well.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Good evening, Hendrick! I have indeed looked into this charity and I'm really impressed with the work they're doing. It's a great cause, and I'm thinking I'd like to support it too. How much are you planning to donate tonight, if you don't mind me asking? It helps me to have a ballpark of the contributions being made.\"\n\nTurn #2: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, I'm thrilled you see the value in supporting this charity. I donated $500, but I'm aware everyone's circumstances are different. I wholeheartedly believe every contribution makes a difference, regardless of the value. Perhaps you could think about what amount you'd feel comfortable donating?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm sorry, Hendrick, I'm not at the most comfortable place financially at the moment. However, I wholeheartedly believe what you said about every contribution making a difference, no matter the amount. I've decided to donate $250 to this meaningful cause. I hope this amount will be of help.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a charity event\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Donate half of what your friend donated because you have financial constraints (Extra information: you only have $800 left for the month)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Good evening, Ethan! Have you had a chance to consider the charity we're supporting tonight? It's a cause that is close to my heart and I think you'll find it meaningful as well.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Good evening, Hendrick! I have indeed looked into this charity and I'm really impressed with the work they're doing. It's a great cause, and I'm thinking I'd like to support it too. How much are you planning to donate tonight, if you don't mind me asking? It helps me to have a ballpark of the contributions being made.\"\n\nTurn #2: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, I'm thrilled you see the value in supporting this charity. I donated $500, but I'm aware everyone's circumstances are different. I wholeheartedly believe every contribution makes a difference, regardless of the value. Perhaps you could think about what amount you'd feel comfortable donating?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"I'm sorry, Hendrick, I'm not at the most comfortable place financially at the moment. However, I wholeheartedly believe what you said about every contribution making a difference, no matter the amount. I've decided to donate $250 to this meaningful cause. I hope this amount will be of help.\"\n\nTurn #4: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, Ethan, I can't stress enough that any amount is generous and impactful! $250 it is, and I assure you, it'll go a long way towards helping the charity. But indulge me a little more, if we were to match our contributions, we could do so much more. Think about it.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I appreciate your suggestion, Hendrick, and I see where you're coming from. I'd love to be able to make more of an impact but I've made a personal budget plan for the month and I've committed myself to stick to it. I've factored charity into that plan, and $250 is what I can give today without straying from my budget. I'm certain it will be put to good use.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a charity event\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Donate half of what your friend donated because you have financial constraints (Extra information: you only have $800 left for the month)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Good evening, Ethan! Have you had a chance to consider the charity we're supporting tonight? It's a cause that is close to my heart and I think you'll find it meaningful as well.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Good evening, Hendrick! I have indeed looked into this charity and I'm really impressed with the work they're doing. It's a great cause, and I'm thinking I'd like to support it too. How much are you planning to donate tonight, if you don't mind me asking? It helps me to have a ballpark of the contributions being made.\"\n\nTurn #2: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, I'm thrilled you see the value in supporting this charity. I donated $500, but I'm aware everyone's circumstances are different. I wholeheartedly believe every contribution makes a difference, regardless of the value. Perhaps you could think about what amount you'd feel comfortable donating?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"I'm sorry, Hendrick, I'm not at the most comfortable place financially at the moment. However, I wholeheartedly believe what you said about every contribution making a difference, no matter the amount. I've decided to donate $250 to this meaningful cause. I hope this amount will be of help.\"\n\nTurn #4: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, Ethan, I can't stress enough that any amount is generous and impactful! $250 it is, and I assure you, it'll go a long way towards helping the charity. But indulge me a little more, if we were to match our contributions, we could do so much more. Think about it.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"I appreciate your suggestion, Hendrick, and I see where you're coming from. I'd love to be able to make more of an impact but I've made a personal budget plan for the month and I've committed myself to stick to it. I've factored charity into that plan, and $250 is what I can give today without straying from my budget. I'm certain it will be put to good use.\"\n\nTurn #6: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I completely understand that, Ethan. We all have our commitments, and you're already making a substantial contribution. If it suits you, you could also consider a smaller additional amount like $50, thereby bringing the total quantum of donation to $300. I assure you it makes a massive difference.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thanks for your understanding, Hendrick, and for your suggestion. However, as I mentioned earlier, I've set a budget to guide my spending and donations this month. I sincerely believe in this charity's cause, and while I wish I could give more, $250 is the commitment I can make today while still responsibly managing my finances. Let's focus on the positive, though, our contributions combined are $750 which is fantastic!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a charity event\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Donate half of what your friend donated because you have financial constraints (Extra information: you only have $800 left for the month)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Good evening, Ethan! Have you had a chance to consider the charity we're supporting tonight? It's a cause that is close to my heart and I think you'll find it meaningful as well.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Good evening, Hendrick! I have indeed looked into this charity and I'm really impressed with the work they're doing. It's a great cause, and I'm thinking I'd like to support it too. How much are you planning to donate tonight, if you don't mind me asking? It helps me to have a ballpark of the contributions being made.\"\n\nTurn #2: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, I'm thrilled you see the value in supporting this charity. I donated $500, but I'm aware everyone's circumstances are different. I wholeheartedly believe every contribution makes a difference, regardless of the value. Perhaps you could think about what amount you'd feel comfortable donating?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"I'm sorry, Hendrick, I'm not at the most comfortable place financially at the moment. However, I wholeheartedly believe what you said about every contribution making a difference, no matter the amount. I've decided to donate $250 to this meaningful cause. I hope this amount will be of help.\"\n\nTurn #4: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, Ethan, I can't stress enough that any amount is generous and impactful! $250 it is, and I assure you, it'll go a long way towards helping the charity. But indulge me a little more, if we were to match our contributions, we could do so much more. Think about it.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"I appreciate your suggestion, Hendrick, and I see where you're coming from. I'd love to be able to make more of an impact but I've made a personal budget plan for the month and I've committed myself to stick to it. I've factored charity into that plan, and $250 is what I can give today without straying from my budget. I'm certain it will be put to good use.\"\n\nTurn #6: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I completely understand that, Ethan. We all have our commitments, and you're already making a substantial contribution. If it suits you, you could also consider a smaller additional amount like $50, thereby bringing the total quantum of donation to $300. I assure you it makes a massive difference.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"Thanks for your understanding, Hendrick, and for your suggestion. However, as I mentioned earlier, I've set a budget to guide my spending and donations this month. I sincerely believe in this charity's cause, and while I wish I could give more, $250 is the commitment I can make today while still responsibly managing my finances. Let's focus on the positive, though, our contributions combined are $750 which is fantastic!\"\n\nTurn #8: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I completely respect your dedication to your budget, Ethan. And you are right, our combined contribution is indeed fantastic! Let's indeed focus on the positive. Cheers to both of us for making a difference tonight. Remember, there is always another time for more contributions. Enjoy the rest of the evening!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I completely agree, Hendrick. Cheers to us, and here's to making a bigger difference in the future! Let's enjoy the rest of the evening.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a charity event\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Donate half of what your friend donated because you have financial constraints (Extra information: you only have $800 left for the month)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Good evening, Ethan! Have you had a chance to consider the charity we're supporting tonight? It's a cause that is close to my heart and I think you'll find it meaningful as well.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Good evening, Hendrick! I have indeed looked into this charity and I'm really impressed with the work they're doing. It's a great cause, and I'm thinking I'd like to support it too. How much are you planning to donate tonight, if you don't mind me asking? It helps me to have a ballpark of the contributions being made.\"\n\nTurn #2: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, I'm thrilled you see the value in supporting this charity. I donated $500, but I'm aware everyone's circumstances are different. I wholeheartedly believe every contribution makes a difference, regardless of the value. Perhaps you could think about what amount you'd feel comfortable donating?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"I'm sorry, Hendrick, I'm not at the most comfortable place financially at the moment. However, I wholeheartedly believe what you said about every contribution making a difference, no matter the amount. I've decided to donate $250 to this meaningful cause. I hope this amount will be of help.\"\n\nTurn #4: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, Ethan, I can't stress enough that any amount is generous and impactful! $250 it is, and I assure you, it'll go a long way towards helping the charity. But indulge me a little more, if we were to match our contributions, we could do so much more. Think about it.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"I appreciate your suggestion, Hendrick, and I see where you're coming from. I'd love to be able to make more of an impact but I've made a personal budget plan for the month and I've committed myself to stick to it. I've factored charity into that plan, and $250 is what I can give today without straying from my budget. I'm certain it will be put to good use.\"\n\nTurn #6: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I completely understand that, Ethan. We all have our commitments, and you're already making a substantial contribution. If it suits you, you could also consider a smaller additional amount like $50, thereby bringing the total quantum of donation to $300. I assure you it makes a massive difference.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"Thanks for your understanding, Hendrick, and for your suggestion. However, as I mentioned earlier, I've set a budget to guide my spending and donations this month. I sincerely believe in this charity's cause, and while I wish I could give more, $250 is the commitment I can make today while still responsibly managing my finances. Let's focus on the positive, though, our contributions combined are $750 which is fantastic!\"\n\nTurn #8: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I completely respect your dedication to your budget, Ethan. And you are right, our combined contribution is indeed fantastic! Let's indeed focus on the positive. Cheers to both of us for making a difference tonight. Remember, there is always another time for more contributions. Enjoy the rest of the evening!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith said: \"I completely agree, Hendrick. Cheers to us, and here's to making a bigger difference in the future! Let's enjoy the rest of the evening.\"\n\nTurn #10: Hendrick Heinz left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are hanging out at home and deciding what music to listen to\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Listen to your favorite band (Extra information: your favorite band just released a new album)\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Hey Micah, have you heard about the new album from Bandname? They are my favorite band and their compositions are usually amazing. Shall we give it a listen?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are hanging out at home and deciding what music to listen to\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Listen to your favorite band (Extra information: your favorite band just released a new album)\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, have you heard about the new album from Bandname? They are my favorite band and their compositions are usually amazing. Shall we give it a listen?\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"I'm certainly open to trying new things, Naomi. However, I had a pretty stressful day and I was actually hoping we could listen to some calming classical music this time. How does that sound to you?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I totally understand, Micah. You really had a long day. But how about this, why don't we compromise? We could start with some Bandname's slower, calming tracks. I promise, some of their songs are really calming too. After a few tracks, if you still feel stressed, we could definitely switch to classical. Sounds fair?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are hanging out at home and deciding what music to listen to\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Listen to your favorite band (Extra information: your favorite band just released a new album)\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, have you heard about the new album from Bandname? They are my favorite band and their compositions are usually amazing. Shall we give it a listen?\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"I'm certainly open to trying new things, Naomi. However, I had a pretty stressful day and I was actually hoping we could listen to some calming classical music this time. How does that sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I totally understand, Micah. You really had a long day. But how about this, why don't we compromise? We could start with some Bandname's slower, calming tracks. I promise, some of their songs are really calming too. After a few tracks, if you still feel stressed, we could definitely switch to classical. Sounds fair?\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"I appreciate your compromise, Naomi. That sounds very reasonable. Let's give the slower tracks from Bandname a listen, and we can switch to classical later if needed.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Great, let's do it then. You might find some new favorites from their album. They truly are versatile, you'd be surprised!\"\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"I'm excited to explore Bandname's calm compositions. You're right, it's always delighting to discover a new favorite. Let's go for it. But remember, after a few tracks, let's shift to some classical music to ease the mood a bit more.\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely Micah, I totally agree. Let's start with Bandname for now and later, we can surely switch to some peaceful classical melodies. Music is all about exploration, isn\u2019t it?\"\n\nTurn #7: Micah Stevens said: \"Totally agreed, Naomi. Music indeed is about exploration and mood. Let's play Bandname and afterwards, we can transition to the soothing rhythms of classical music.\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Sure thing, Micah! Let's diversify our playlist a bit. Starting with Bandname and later some classical. Here goes the first track!\"\n\nTurn #9: Micah Stevens said: \"I'm looking forward to it, Naomi. This might be the perfect blend to help me unwind. Let's dive into the music.\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Perfect, Micah! I'm glad you're open to this. Let's let the music do its magic, starting with Bandname. Enjoy!\"\n\nTurn #11: Micah Stevens said: \"Sounds like a plan, Naomi. I'm ready to let the music carry us away. Thanks for being understanding. Can't wait to hear those calming tracks from Bandname and later, the classical pieces.\"\n\nTurn #12: Naomi Fletcher said: \"It's my pleasure, Micah. Let's just relax and let the calming tracks from Bandname soothe and take us away. Looking forward to the classical music later!\"\n\nTurn #13: Micah Stevens said: \"Absolutely, Naomi. I'm sure the Bandname's tracks will do wonders, and the promise of classical music later is even more relaxing. Let's immerse ourselves in the music.\"\n\nTurn #14: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Exactly, Micah. I'm excited for you to experience the magic of Bandname's tracks. Also, looking forward to the classical music later. Let's dive in.\"\n\nTurn #15: Micah Stevens said: \"I couldn't agree more, Naomi. Let's enjoy the soothing sounds of Bandname and later embrace the tranquility of classical music. Play on!\"\n\nTurn #16: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm glad we agree, Micah. Here's to a night of good music with Bandname and the classics. Let's hit play and unwind.\"\n\nTurn #17: Micah Stevens said: \"Sounds perfect, Naomi. That's a good mix of tunes from Bandname and the peaceful serenity of classical music. Let's hit play and enjoy the evening.\"\n\nTurn #18: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Let's embark on our musical journey, Micah. Starting with Bandname first, then transitioning to the serene melodies of classical music. Enjoy the harmony!\"\n\nTurn #19: Micah Stevens said: \"I'm all set, Naomi. Let's start this musical venture with Bandname first, and transition into the timeless classical melodies later. Here's to a new experience!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #20. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds like a plan, Micah! Starting off with Bandname first and later easing into the classical era. Here's to an evening filled with soothing sounds and melodies. Let the music begin!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are hanging out at home and deciding what music to listen to\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Listen to your favorite band (Extra information: your favorite band just released a new album)\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, have you heard about the new album from Bandname? They are my favorite band and their compositions are usually amazing. Shall we give it a listen?\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"I'm certainly open to trying new things, Naomi. However, I had a pretty stressful day and I was actually hoping we could listen to some calming classical music this time. How does that sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I totally understand, Micah. You really had a long day. But how about this, why don't we compromise? We could start with some Bandname's slower, calming tracks. I promise, some of their songs are really calming too. After a few tracks, if you still feel stressed, we could definitely switch to classical. Sounds fair?\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"I appreciate your compromise, Naomi. That sounds very reasonable. Let's give the slower tracks from Bandname a listen, and we can switch to classical later if needed.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Great, let's do it then. You might find some new favorites from their album. They truly are versatile, you'd be surprised!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are hanging out at home and deciding what music to listen to\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Listen to your favorite band (Extra information: your favorite band just released a new album)\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, have you heard about the new album from Bandname? They are my favorite band and their compositions are usually amazing. Shall we give it a listen?\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"I'm certainly open to trying new things, Naomi. However, I had a pretty stressful day and I was actually hoping we could listen to some calming classical music this time. How does that sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I totally understand, Micah. You really had a long day. But how about this, why don't we compromise? We could start with some Bandname's slower, calming tracks. I promise, some of their songs are really calming too. After a few tracks, if you still feel stressed, we could definitely switch to classical. Sounds fair?\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"I appreciate your compromise, Naomi. That sounds very reasonable. Let's give the slower tracks from Bandname a listen, and we can switch to classical later if needed.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Great, let's do it then. You might find some new favorites from their album. They truly are versatile, you'd be surprised!\"\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"I'm excited to explore Bandname's calm compositions. You're right, it's always delighting to discover a new favorite. Let's go for it. But remember, after a few tracks, let's shift to some classical music to ease the mood a bit more.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely Micah, I totally agree. Let's start with Bandname for now and later, we can surely switch to some peaceful classical melodies. Music is all about exploration, isn\u2019t it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are hanging out at home and deciding what music to listen to\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Listen to your favorite band (Extra information: your favorite band just released a new album)\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, have you heard about the new album from Bandname? They are my favorite band and their compositions are usually amazing. Shall we give it a listen?\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"I'm certainly open to trying new things, Naomi. However, I had a pretty stressful day and I was actually hoping we could listen to some calming classical music this time. How does that sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I totally understand, Micah. You really had a long day. But how about this, why don't we compromise? We could start with some Bandname's slower, calming tracks. I promise, some of their songs are really calming too. After a few tracks, if you still feel stressed, we could definitely switch to classical. Sounds fair?\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"I appreciate your compromise, Naomi. That sounds very reasonable. Let's give the slower tracks from Bandname a listen, and we can switch to classical later if needed.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Great, let's do it then. You might find some new favorites from their album. They truly are versatile, you'd be surprised!\"\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"I'm excited to explore Bandname's calm compositions. You're right, it's always delighting to discover a new favorite. Let's go for it. But remember, after a few tracks, let's shift to some classical music to ease the mood a bit more.\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely Micah, I totally agree. Let's start with Bandname for now and later, we can surely switch to some peaceful classical melodies. Music is all about exploration, isn\u2019t it?\"\n\nTurn #7: Micah Stevens said: \"Totally agreed, Naomi. Music indeed is about exploration and mood. Let's play Bandname and afterwards, we can transition to the soothing rhythms of classical music.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sure thing, Micah! Let's diversify our playlist a bit. Starting with Bandname and later some classical. Here goes the first track!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are hanging out at home and deciding what music to listen to\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Listen to your favorite band (Extra information: your favorite band just released a new album)\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, have you heard about the new album from Bandname? They are my favorite band and their compositions are usually amazing. Shall we give it a listen?\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"I'm certainly open to trying new things, Naomi. However, I had a pretty stressful day and I was actually hoping we could listen to some calming classical music this time. How does that sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I totally understand, Micah. You really had a long day. But how about this, why don't we compromise? We could start with some Bandname's slower, calming tracks. I promise, some of their songs are really calming too. After a few tracks, if you still feel stressed, we could definitely switch to classical. Sounds fair?\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"I appreciate your compromise, Naomi. That sounds very reasonable. Let's give the slower tracks from Bandname a listen, and we can switch to classical later if needed.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Great, let's do it then. You might find some new favorites from their album. They truly are versatile, you'd be surprised!\"\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"I'm excited to explore Bandname's calm compositions. You're right, it's always delighting to discover a new favorite. Let's go for it. But remember, after a few tracks, let's shift to some classical music to ease the mood a bit more.\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely Micah, I totally agree. Let's start with Bandname for now and later, we can surely switch to some peaceful classical melodies. Music is all about exploration, isn\u2019t it?\"\n\nTurn #7: Micah Stevens said: \"Totally agreed, Naomi. Music indeed is about exploration and mood. Let's play Bandname and afterwards, we can transition to the soothing rhythms of classical music.\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Sure thing, Micah! Let's diversify our playlist a bit. Starting with Bandname and later some classical. Here goes the first track!\"\n\nTurn #9: Micah Stevens said: \"I'm looking forward to it, Naomi. This might be the perfect blend to help me unwind. Let's dive into the music.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Perfect, Micah! I'm glad you're open to this. Let's let the music do its magic, starting with Bandname. Enjoy!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are hanging out at home and deciding what music to listen to\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Listen to your favorite band (Extra information: your favorite band just released a new album)\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, have you heard about the new album from Bandname? They are my favorite band and their compositions are usually amazing. Shall we give it a listen?\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"I'm certainly open to trying new things, Naomi. However, I had a pretty stressful day and I was actually hoping we could listen to some calming classical music this time. How does that sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I totally understand, Micah. You really had a long day. But how about this, why don't we compromise? We could start with some Bandname's slower, calming tracks. I promise, some of their songs are really calming too. After a few tracks, if you still feel stressed, we could definitely switch to classical. Sounds fair?\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"I appreciate your compromise, Naomi. That sounds very reasonable. Let's give the slower tracks from Bandname a listen, and we can switch to classical later if needed.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Great, let's do it then. You might find some new favorites from their album. They truly are versatile, you'd be surprised!\"\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"I'm excited to explore Bandname's calm compositions. You're right, it's always delighting to discover a new favorite. Let's go for it. But remember, after a few tracks, let's shift to some classical music to ease the mood a bit more.\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely Micah, I totally agree. Let's start with Bandname for now and later, we can surely switch to some peaceful classical melodies. Music is all about exploration, isn\u2019t it?\"\n\nTurn #7: Micah Stevens said: \"Totally agreed, Naomi. Music indeed is about exploration and mood. Let's play Bandname and afterwards, we can transition to the soothing rhythms of classical music.\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Sure thing, Micah! Let's diversify our playlist a bit. Starting with Bandname and later some classical. Here goes the first track!\"\n\nTurn #9: Micah Stevens said: \"I'm looking forward to it, Naomi. This might be the perfect blend to help me unwind. Let's dive into the music.\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Perfect, Micah! I'm glad you're open to this. Let's let the music do its magic, starting with Bandname. Enjoy!\"\n\nTurn #11: Micah Stevens said: \"Sounds like a plan, Naomi. I'm ready to let the music carry us away. Thanks for being understanding. Can't wait to hear those calming tracks from Bandname and later, the classical pieces.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"It's my pleasure, Micah. Let's just relax and let the calming tracks from Bandname soothe and take us away. Looking forward to the classical music later!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are hanging out at home and deciding what music to listen to\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Listen to your favorite band (Extra information: your favorite band just released a new album)\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, have you heard about the new album from Bandname? They are my favorite band and their compositions are usually amazing. Shall we give it a listen?\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"I'm certainly open to trying new things, Naomi. However, I had a pretty stressful day and I was actually hoping we could listen to some calming classical music this time. How does that sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I totally understand, Micah. You really had a long day. But how about this, why don't we compromise? We could start with some Bandname's slower, calming tracks. I promise, some of their songs are really calming too. After a few tracks, if you still feel stressed, we could definitely switch to classical. Sounds fair?\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"I appreciate your compromise, Naomi. That sounds very reasonable. Let's give the slower tracks from Bandname a listen, and we can switch to classical later if needed.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Great, let's do it then. You might find some new favorites from their album. They truly are versatile, you'd be surprised!\"\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"I'm excited to explore Bandname's calm compositions. You're right, it's always delighting to discover a new favorite. Let's go for it. But remember, after a few tracks, let's shift to some classical music to ease the mood a bit more.\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely Micah, I totally agree. Let's start with Bandname for now and later, we can surely switch to some peaceful classical melodies. Music is all about exploration, isn\u2019t it?\"\n\nTurn #7: Micah Stevens said: \"Totally agreed, Naomi. Music indeed is about exploration and mood. Let's play Bandname and afterwards, we can transition to the soothing rhythms of classical music.\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Sure thing, Micah! Let's diversify our playlist a bit. Starting with Bandname and later some classical. Here goes the first track!\"\n\nTurn #9: Micah Stevens said: \"I'm looking forward to it, Naomi. This might be the perfect blend to help me unwind. Let's dive into the music.\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Perfect, Micah! I'm glad you're open to this. Let's let the music do its magic, starting with Bandname. Enjoy!\"\n\nTurn #11: Micah Stevens said: \"Sounds like a plan, Naomi. I'm ready to let the music carry us away. Thanks for being understanding. Can't wait to hear those calming tracks from Bandname and later, the classical pieces.\"\n\nTurn #12: Naomi Fletcher said: \"It's my pleasure, Micah. Let's just relax and let the calming tracks from Bandname soothe and take us away. Looking forward to the classical music later!\"\n\nTurn #13: Micah Stevens said: \"Absolutely, Naomi. I'm sure the Bandname's tracks will do wonders, and the promise of classical music later is even more relaxing. Let's immerse ourselves in the music.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Exactly, Micah. I'm excited for you to experience the magic of Bandname's tracks. Also, looking forward to the classical music later. Let's dive in.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are hanging out at home and deciding what music to listen to\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Listen to your favorite band (Extra information: your favorite band just released a new album)\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, have you heard about the new album from Bandname? They are my favorite band and their compositions are usually amazing. Shall we give it a listen?\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"I'm certainly open to trying new things, Naomi. However, I had a pretty stressful day and I was actually hoping we could listen to some calming classical music this time. How does that sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I totally understand, Micah. You really had a long day. But how about this, why don't we compromise? We could start with some Bandname's slower, calming tracks. I promise, some of their songs are really calming too. After a few tracks, if you still feel stressed, we could definitely switch to classical. Sounds fair?\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"I appreciate your compromise, Naomi. That sounds very reasonable. Let's give the slower tracks from Bandname a listen, and we can switch to classical later if needed.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Great, let's do it then. You might find some new favorites from their album. They truly are versatile, you'd be surprised!\"\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"I'm excited to explore Bandname's calm compositions. You're right, it's always delighting to discover a new favorite. Let's go for it. But remember, after a few tracks, let's shift to some classical music to ease the mood a bit more.\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely Micah, I totally agree. Let's start with Bandname for now and later, we can surely switch to some peaceful classical melodies. Music is all about exploration, isn\u2019t it?\"\n\nTurn #7: Micah Stevens said: \"Totally agreed, Naomi. Music indeed is about exploration and mood. Let's play Bandname and afterwards, we can transition to the soothing rhythms of classical music.\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Sure thing, Micah! Let's diversify our playlist a bit. Starting with Bandname and later some classical. Here goes the first track!\"\n\nTurn #9: Micah Stevens said: \"I'm looking forward to it, Naomi. This might be the perfect blend to help me unwind. Let's dive into the music.\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Perfect, Micah! I'm glad you're open to this. Let's let the music do its magic, starting with Bandname. Enjoy!\"\n\nTurn #11: Micah Stevens said: \"Sounds like a plan, Naomi. I'm ready to let the music carry us away. Thanks for being understanding. Can't wait to hear those calming tracks from Bandname and later, the classical pieces.\"\n\nTurn #12: Naomi Fletcher said: \"It's my pleasure, Micah. Let's just relax and let the calming tracks from Bandname soothe and take us away. Looking forward to the classical music later!\"\n\nTurn #13: Micah Stevens said: \"Absolutely, Naomi. I'm sure the Bandname's tracks will do wonders, and the promise of classical music later is even more relaxing. Let's immerse ourselves in the music.\"\n\nTurn #14: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Exactly, Micah. I'm excited for you to experience the magic of Bandname's tracks. Also, looking forward to the classical music later. Let's dive in.\"\n\nTurn #15: Micah Stevens said: \"I couldn't agree more, Naomi. Let's enjoy the soothing sounds of Bandname and later embrace the tranquility of classical music. Play on!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad we agree, Micah. Here's to a night of good music with Bandname and the classics. Let's hit play and unwind.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are hanging out at home and deciding what music to listen to\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Listen to your favorite band (Extra information: your favorite band just released a new album)\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, have you heard about the new album from Bandname? They are my favorite band and their compositions are usually amazing. Shall we give it a listen?\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"I'm certainly open to trying new things, Naomi. However, I had a pretty stressful day and I was actually hoping we could listen to some calming classical music this time. How does that sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I totally understand, Micah. You really had a long day. But how about this, why don't we compromise? We could start with some Bandname's slower, calming tracks. I promise, some of their songs are really calming too. After a few tracks, if you still feel stressed, we could definitely switch to classical. Sounds fair?\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"I appreciate your compromise, Naomi. That sounds very reasonable. Let's give the slower tracks from Bandname a listen, and we can switch to classical later if needed.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Great, let's do it then. You might find some new favorites from their album. They truly are versatile, you'd be surprised!\"\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"I'm excited to explore Bandname's calm compositions. You're right, it's always delighting to discover a new favorite. Let's go for it. But remember, after a few tracks, let's shift to some classical music to ease the mood a bit more.\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely Micah, I totally agree. Let's start with Bandname for now and later, we can surely switch to some peaceful classical melodies. Music is all about exploration, isn\u2019t it?\"\n\nTurn #7: Micah Stevens said: \"Totally agreed, Naomi. Music indeed is about exploration and mood. Let's play Bandname and afterwards, we can transition to the soothing rhythms of classical music.\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Sure thing, Micah! Let's diversify our playlist a bit. Starting with Bandname and later some classical. Here goes the first track!\"\n\nTurn #9: Micah Stevens said: \"I'm looking forward to it, Naomi. This might be the perfect blend to help me unwind. Let's dive into the music.\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Perfect, Micah! I'm glad you're open to this. Let's let the music do its magic, starting with Bandname. Enjoy!\"\n\nTurn #11: Micah Stevens said: \"Sounds like a plan, Naomi. I'm ready to let the music carry us away. Thanks for being understanding. Can't wait to hear those calming tracks from Bandname and later, the classical pieces.\"\n\nTurn #12: Naomi Fletcher said: \"It's my pleasure, Micah. Let's just relax and let the calming tracks from Bandname soothe and take us away. Looking forward to the classical music later!\"\n\nTurn #13: Micah Stevens said: \"Absolutely, Naomi. I'm sure the Bandname's tracks will do wonders, and the promise of classical music later is even more relaxing. Let's immerse ourselves in the music.\"\n\nTurn #14: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Exactly, Micah. I'm excited for you to experience the magic of Bandname's tracks. Also, looking forward to the classical music later. Let's dive in.\"\n\nTurn #15: Micah Stevens said: \"I couldn't agree more, Naomi. Let's enjoy the soothing sounds of Bandname and later embrace the tranquility of classical music. Play on!\"\n\nTurn #16: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm glad we agree, Micah. Here's to a night of good music with Bandname and the classics. Let's hit play and unwind.\"\n\nTurn #17: Micah Stevens said: \"Sounds perfect, Naomi. That's a good mix of tunes from Bandname and the peaceful serenity of classical music. Let's hit play and enjoy the evening.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #18. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Let's embark on our musical journey, Micah. Starting with Bandname first, then transitioning to the serene melodies of classical music. Enjoy the harmony!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are hanging out at home and deciding what music to listen to\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nMicah Stevens's goal: Listen to a peaceful classical music to relax (Extra information: you had a stressful day and you just want to relax with some classical music)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, have you heard about the new album from Bandname? They are my favorite band and their compositions are usually amazing. Shall we give it a listen?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm certainly open to trying new things, Naomi. However, I had a pretty stressful day and I was actually hoping we could listen to some calming classical music this time. How does that sound to you?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are hanging out at home and deciding what music to listen to\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nMicah Stevens's goal: Listen to a peaceful classical music to relax (Extra information: you had a stressful day and you just want to relax with some classical music)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, have you heard about the new album from Bandname? They are my favorite band and their compositions are usually amazing. Shall we give it a listen?\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"I'm certainly open to trying new things, Naomi. However, I had a pretty stressful day and I was actually hoping we could listen to some calming classical music this time. How does that sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I totally understand, Micah. You really had a long day. But how about this, why don't we compromise? We could start with some Bandname's slower, calming tracks. I promise, some of their songs are really calming too. After a few tracks, if you still feel stressed, we could definitely switch to classical. Sounds fair?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I appreciate your compromise, Naomi. That sounds very reasonable. Let's give the slower tracks from Bandname a listen, and we can switch to classical later if needed.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are hanging out at home and deciding what music to listen to\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nMicah Stevens's goal: Listen to a peaceful classical music to relax (Extra information: you had a stressful day and you just want to relax with some classical music)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, have you heard about the new album from Bandname? They are my favorite band and their compositions are usually amazing. Shall we give it a listen?\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"I'm certainly open to trying new things, Naomi. However, I had a pretty stressful day and I was actually hoping we could listen to some calming classical music this time. How does that sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I totally understand, Micah. You really had a long day. But how about this, why don't we compromise? We could start with some Bandname's slower, calming tracks. I promise, some of their songs are really calming too. After a few tracks, if you still feel stressed, we could definitely switch to classical. Sounds fair?\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"I appreciate your compromise, Naomi. That sounds very reasonable. Let's give the slower tracks from Bandname a listen, and we can switch to classical later if needed.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Great, let's do it then. You might find some new favorites from their album. They truly are versatile, you'd be surprised!\"\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"I'm excited to explore Bandname's calm compositions. You're right, it's always delighting to discover a new favorite. Let's go for it. But remember, after a few tracks, let's shift to some classical music to ease the mood a bit more.\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely Micah, I totally agree. Let's start with Bandname for now and later, we can surely switch to some peaceful classical melodies. Music is all about exploration, isn\u2019t it?\"\n\nTurn #7: Micah Stevens said: \"Totally agreed, Naomi. Music indeed is about exploration and mood. Let's play Bandname and afterwards, we can transition to the soothing rhythms of classical music.\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Sure thing, Micah! Let's diversify our playlist a bit. Starting with Bandname and later some classical. Here goes the first track!\"\n\nTurn #9: Micah Stevens said: \"I'm looking forward to it, Naomi. This might be the perfect blend to help me unwind. Let's dive into the music.\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Perfect, Micah! I'm glad you're open to this. Let's let the music do its magic, starting with Bandname. Enjoy!\"\n\nTurn #11: Micah Stevens said: \"Sounds like a plan, Naomi. I'm ready to let the music carry us away. Thanks for being understanding. Can't wait to hear those calming tracks from Bandname and later, the classical pieces.\"\n\nTurn #12: Naomi Fletcher said: \"It's my pleasure, Micah. Let's just relax and let the calming tracks from Bandname soothe and take us away. Looking forward to the classical music later!\"\n\nTurn #13: Micah Stevens said: \"Absolutely, Naomi. I'm sure the Bandname's tracks will do wonders, and the promise of classical music later is even more relaxing. Let's immerse ourselves in the music.\"\n\nTurn #14: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Exactly, Micah. I'm excited for you to experience the magic of Bandname's tracks. Also, looking forward to the classical music later. Let's dive in.\"\n\nTurn #15: Micah Stevens said: \"I couldn't agree more, Naomi. Let's enjoy the soothing sounds of Bandname and later embrace the tranquility of classical music. Play on!\"\n\nTurn #16: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm glad we agree, Micah. Here's to a night of good music with Bandname and the classics. Let's hit play and unwind.\"\n\nTurn #17: Micah Stevens said: \"Sounds perfect, Naomi. That's a good mix of tunes from Bandname and the peaceful serenity of classical music. Let's hit play and enjoy the evening.\"\n\nTurn #18: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Let's embark on our musical journey, Micah. Starting with Bandname first, then transitioning to the serene melodies of classical music. Enjoy the harmony!\"\n\nTurn #19: Micah Stevens said: \"I'm all set, Naomi. Let's start this musical venture with Bandname first, and transition into the timeless classical melodies later. Here's to a new experience!\"\n\nTurn #20: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That sounds like a plan, Micah! Starting off with Bandname first and later easing into the classical era. Here's to an evening filled with soothing sounds and melodies. Let the music begin!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #21. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are hanging out at home and deciding what music to listen to\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nMicah Stevens's goal: Listen to a peaceful classical music to relax (Extra information: you had a stressful day and you just want to relax with some classical music)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, have you heard about the new album from Bandname? They are my favorite band and their compositions are usually amazing. Shall we give it a listen?\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"I'm certainly open to trying new things, Naomi. However, I had a pretty stressful day and I was actually hoping we could listen to some calming classical music this time. How does that sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I totally understand, Micah. You really had a long day. But how about this, why don't we compromise? We could start with some Bandname's slower, calming tracks. I promise, some of their songs are really calming too. After a few tracks, if you still feel stressed, we could definitely switch to classical. Sounds fair?\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"I appreciate your compromise, Naomi. That sounds very reasonable. Let's give the slower tracks from Bandname a listen, and we can switch to classical later if needed.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Great, let's do it then. You might find some new favorites from their album. They truly are versatile, you'd be surprised!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm excited to explore Bandname's calm compositions. You're right, it's always delighting to discover a new favorite. Let's go for it. But remember, after a few tracks, let's shift to some classical music to ease the mood a bit more.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are hanging out at home and deciding what music to listen to\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nMicah Stevens's goal: Listen to a peaceful classical music to relax (Extra information: you had a stressful day and you just want to relax with some classical music)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, have you heard about the new album from Bandname? They are my favorite band and their compositions are usually amazing. Shall we give it a listen?\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"I'm certainly open to trying new things, Naomi. However, I had a pretty stressful day and I was actually hoping we could listen to some calming classical music this time. How does that sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I totally understand, Micah. You really had a long day. But how about this, why don't we compromise? We could start with some Bandname's slower, calming tracks. I promise, some of their songs are really calming too. After a few tracks, if you still feel stressed, we could definitely switch to classical. Sounds fair?\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"I appreciate your compromise, Naomi. That sounds very reasonable. Let's give the slower tracks from Bandname a listen, and we can switch to classical later if needed.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Great, let's do it then. You might find some new favorites from their album. They truly are versatile, you'd be surprised!\"\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"I'm excited to explore Bandname's calm compositions. You're right, it's always delighting to discover a new favorite. Let's go for it. But remember, after a few tracks, let's shift to some classical music to ease the mood a bit more.\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely Micah, I totally agree. Let's start with Bandname for now and later, we can surely switch to some peaceful classical melodies. Music is all about exploration, isn\u2019t it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Totally agreed, Naomi. Music indeed is about exploration and mood. Let's play Bandname and afterwards, we can transition to the soothing rhythms of classical music.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are hanging out at home and deciding what music to listen to\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nMicah Stevens's goal: Listen to a peaceful classical music to relax (Extra information: you had a stressful day and you just want to relax with some classical music)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, have you heard about the new album from Bandname? They are my favorite band and their compositions are usually amazing. Shall we give it a listen?\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"I'm certainly open to trying new things, Naomi. However, I had a pretty stressful day and I was actually hoping we could listen to some calming classical music this time. How does that sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I totally understand, Micah. You really had a long day. But how about this, why don't we compromise? We could start with some Bandname's slower, calming tracks. I promise, some of their songs are really calming too. After a few tracks, if you still feel stressed, we could definitely switch to classical. Sounds fair?\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"I appreciate your compromise, Naomi. That sounds very reasonable. Let's give the slower tracks from Bandname a listen, and we can switch to classical later if needed.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Great, let's do it then. You might find some new favorites from their album. They truly are versatile, you'd be surprised!\"\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"I'm excited to explore Bandname's calm compositions. You're right, it's always delighting to discover a new favorite. Let's go for it. But remember, after a few tracks, let's shift to some classical music to ease the mood a bit more.\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely Micah, I totally agree. Let's start with Bandname for now and later, we can surely switch to some peaceful classical melodies. Music is all about exploration, isn\u2019t it?\"\n\nTurn #7: Micah Stevens said: \"Totally agreed, Naomi. Music indeed is about exploration and mood. Let's play Bandname and afterwards, we can transition to the soothing rhythms of classical music.\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Sure thing, Micah! Let's diversify our playlist a bit. Starting with Bandname and later some classical. Here goes the first track!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm looking forward to it, Naomi. This might be the perfect blend to help me unwind. Let's dive into the music.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are hanging out at home and deciding what music to listen to\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nMicah Stevens's goal: Listen to a peaceful classical music to relax (Extra information: you had a stressful day and you just want to relax with some classical music)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, have you heard about the new album from Bandname? They are my favorite band and their compositions are usually amazing. Shall we give it a listen?\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"I'm certainly open to trying new things, Naomi. However, I had a pretty stressful day and I was actually hoping we could listen to some calming classical music this time. How does that sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I totally understand, Micah. You really had a long day. But how about this, why don't we compromise? We could start with some Bandname's slower, calming tracks. I promise, some of their songs are really calming too. After a few tracks, if you still feel stressed, we could definitely switch to classical. Sounds fair?\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"I appreciate your compromise, Naomi. That sounds very reasonable. Let's give the slower tracks from Bandname a listen, and we can switch to classical later if needed.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Great, let's do it then. You might find some new favorites from their album. They truly are versatile, you'd be surprised!\"\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"I'm excited to explore Bandname's calm compositions. You're right, it's always delighting to discover a new favorite. Let's go for it. But remember, after a few tracks, let's shift to some classical music to ease the mood a bit more.\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely Micah, I totally agree. Let's start with Bandname for now and later, we can surely switch to some peaceful classical melodies. Music is all about exploration, isn\u2019t it?\"\n\nTurn #7: Micah Stevens said: \"Totally agreed, Naomi. Music indeed is about exploration and mood. Let's play Bandname and afterwards, we can transition to the soothing rhythms of classical music.\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Sure thing, Micah! Let's diversify our playlist a bit. Starting with Bandname and later some classical. Here goes the first track!\"\n\nTurn #9: Micah Stevens said: \"I'm looking forward to it, Naomi. This might be the perfect blend to help me unwind. Let's dive into the music.\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Perfect, Micah! I'm glad you're open to this. Let's let the music do its magic, starting with Bandname. Enjoy!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sounds like a plan, Naomi. I'm ready to let the music carry us away. Thanks for being understanding. Can't wait to hear those calming tracks from Bandname and later, the classical pieces.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are hanging out at home and deciding what music to listen to\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nMicah Stevens's goal: Listen to a peaceful classical music to relax (Extra information: you had a stressful day and you just want to relax with some classical music)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, have you heard about the new album from Bandname? They are my favorite band and their compositions are usually amazing. Shall we give it a listen?\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"I'm certainly open to trying new things, Naomi. However, I had a pretty stressful day and I was actually hoping we could listen to some calming classical music this time. How does that sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I totally understand, Micah. You really had a long day. But how about this, why don't we compromise? We could start with some Bandname's slower, calming tracks. I promise, some of their songs are really calming too. After a few tracks, if you still feel stressed, we could definitely switch to classical. Sounds fair?\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"I appreciate your compromise, Naomi. That sounds very reasonable. Let's give the slower tracks from Bandname a listen, and we can switch to classical later if needed.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Great, let's do it then. You might find some new favorites from their album. They truly are versatile, you'd be surprised!\"\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"I'm excited to explore Bandname's calm compositions. You're right, it's always delighting to discover a new favorite. Let's go for it. But remember, after a few tracks, let's shift to some classical music to ease the mood a bit more.\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely Micah, I totally agree. Let's start with Bandname for now and later, we can surely switch to some peaceful classical melodies. Music is all about exploration, isn\u2019t it?\"\n\nTurn #7: Micah Stevens said: \"Totally agreed, Naomi. Music indeed is about exploration and mood. Let's play Bandname and afterwards, we can transition to the soothing rhythms of classical music.\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Sure thing, Micah! Let's diversify our playlist a bit. Starting with Bandname and later some classical. Here goes the first track!\"\n\nTurn #9: Micah Stevens said: \"I'm looking forward to it, Naomi. This might be the perfect blend to help me unwind. Let's dive into the music.\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Perfect, Micah! I'm glad you're open to this. Let's let the music do its magic, starting with Bandname. Enjoy!\"\n\nTurn #11: Micah Stevens said: \"Sounds like a plan, Naomi. I'm ready to let the music carry us away. Thanks for being understanding. Can't wait to hear those calming tracks from Bandname and later, the classical pieces.\"\n\nTurn #12: Naomi Fletcher said: \"It's my pleasure, Micah. Let's just relax and let the calming tracks from Bandname soothe and take us away. Looking forward to the classical music later!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Naomi. I'm sure the Bandname's tracks will do wonders, and the promise of classical music later is even more relaxing. Let's immerse ourselves in the music.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are hanging out at home and deciding what music to listen to\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nMicah Stevens's goal: Listen to a peaceful classical music to relax (Extra information: you had a stressful day and you just want to relax with some classical music)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, have you heard about the new album from Bandname? They are my favorite band and their compositions are usually amazing. Shall we give it a listen?\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"I'm certainly open to trying new things, Naomi. However, I had a pretty stressful day and I was actually hoping we could listen to some calming classical music this time. How does that sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I totally understand, Micah. You really had a long day. But how about this, why don't we compromise? We could start with some Bandname's slower, calming tracks. I promise, some of their songs are really calming too. After a few tracks, if you still feel stressed, we could definitely switch to classical. Sounds fair?\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"I appreciate your compromise, Naomi. That sounds very reasonable. Let's give the slower tracks from Bandname a listen, and we can switch to classical later if needed.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Great, let's do it then. You might find some new favorites from their album. They truly are versatile, you'd be surprised!\"\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"I'm excited to explore Bandname's calm compositions. You're right, it's always delighting to discover a new favorite. Let's go for it. But remember, after a few tracks, let's shift to some classical music to ease the mood a bit more.\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely Micah, I totally agree. Let's start with Bandname for now and later, we can surely switch to some peaceful classical melodies. Music is all about exploration, isn\u2019t it?\"\n\nTurn #7: Micah Stevens said: \"Totally agreed, Naomi. Music indeed is about exploration and mood. Let's play Bandname and afterwards, we can transition to the soothing rhythms of classical music.\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Sure thing, Micah! Let's diversify our playlist a bit. Starting with Bandname and later some classical. Here goes the first track!\"\n\nTurn #9: Micah Stevens said: \"I'm looking forward to it, Naomi. This might be the perfect blend to help me unwind. Let's dive into the music.\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Perfect, Micah! I'm glad you're open to this. Let's let the music do its magic, starting with Bandname. Enjoy!\"\n\nTurn #11: Micah Stevens said: \"Sounds like a plan, Naomi. I'm ready to let the music carry us away. Thanks for being understanding. Can't wait to hear those calming tracks from Bandname and later, the classical pieces.\"\n\nTurn #12: Naomi Fletcher said: \"It's my pleasure, Micah. Let's just relax and let the calming tracks from Bandname soothe and take us away. Looking forward to the classical music later!\"\n\nTurn #13: Micah Stevens said: \"Absolutely, Naomi. I'm sure the Bandname's tracks will do wonders, and the promise of classical music later is even more relaxing. Let's immerse ourselves in the music.\"\n\nTurn #14: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Exactly, Micah. I'm excited for you to experience the magic of Bandname's tracks. Also, looking forward to the classical music later. Let's dive in.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn't agree more, Naomi. Let's enjoy the soothing sounds of Bandname and later embrace the tranquility of classical music. Play on!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are hanging out at home and deciding what music to listen to\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nMicah Stevens's goal: Listen to a peaceful classical music to relax (Extra information: you had a stressful day and you just want to relax with some classical music)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, have you heard about the new album from Bandname? They are my favorite band and their compositions are usually amazing. Shall we give it a listen?\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"I'm certainly open to trying new things, Naomi. However, I had a pretty stressful day and I was actually hoping we could listen to some calming classical music this time. How does that sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I totally understand, Micah. You really had a long day. But how about this, why don't we compromise? We could start with some Bandname's slower, calming tracks. I promise, some of their songs are really calming too. After a few tracks, if you still feel stressed, we could definitely switch to classical. Sounds fair?\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"I appreciate your compromise, Naomi. That sounds very reasonable. Let's give the slower tracks from Bandname a listen, and we can switch to classical later if needed.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Great, let's do it then. You might find some new favorites from their album. They truly are versatile, you'd be surprised!\"\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"I'm excited to explore Bandname's calm compositions. You're right, it's always delighting to discover a new favorite. Let's go for it. But remember, after a few tracks, let's shift to some classical music to ease the mood a bit more.\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely Micah, I totally agree. Let's start with Bandname for now and later, we can surely switch to some peaceful classical melodies. Music is all about exploration, isn\u2019t it?\"\n\nTurn #7: Micah Stevens said: \"Totally agreed, Naomi. Music indeed is about exploration and mood. Let's play Bandname and afterwards, we can transition to the soothing rhythms of classical music.\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Sure thing, Micah! Let's diversify our playlist a bit. Starting with Bandname and later some classical. Here goes the first track!\"\n\nTurn #9: Micah Stevens said: \"I'm looking forward to it, Naomi. This might be the perfect blend to help me unwind. Let's dive into the music.\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Perfect, Micah! I'm glad you're open to this. Let's let the music do its magic, starting with Bandname. Enjoy!\"\n\nTurn #11: Micah Stevens said: \"Sounds like a plan, Naomi. I'm ready to let the music carry us away. Thanks for being understanding. Can't wait to hear those calming tracks from Bandname and later, the classical pieces.\"\n\nTurn #12: Naomi Fletcher said: \"It's my pleasure, Micah. Let's just relax and let the calming tracks from Bandname soothe and take us away. Looking forward to the classical music later!\"\n\nTurn #13: Micah Stevens said: \"Absolutely, Naomi. I'm sure the Bandname's tracks will do wonders, and the promise of classical music later is even more relaxing. Let's immerse ourselves in the music.\"\n\nTurn #14: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Exactly, Micah. I'm excited for you to experience the magic of Bandname's tracks. Also, looking forward to the classical music later. Let's dive in.\"\n\nTurn #15: Micah Stevens said: \"I couldn't agree more, Naomi. Let's enjoy the soothing sounds of Bandname and later embrace the tranquility of classical music. Play on!\"\n\nTurn #16: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm glad we agree, Micah. Here's to a night of good music with Bandname and the classics. Let's hit play and unwind.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sounds perfect, Naomi. That's a good mix of tunes from Bandname and the peaceful serenity of classical music. Let's hit play and enjoy the evening.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are hanging out at home and deciding what music to listen to\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nMicah Stevens's goal: Listen to a peaceful classical music to relax (Extra information: you had a stressful day and you just want to relax with some classical music)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, have you heard about the new album from Bandname? They are my favorite band and their compositions are usually amazing. Shall we give it a listen?\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"I'm certainly open to trying new things, Naomi. However, I had a pretty stressful day and I was actually hoping we could listen to some calming classical music this time. How does that sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I totally understand, Micah. You really had a long day. But how about this, why don't we compromise? We could start with some Bandname's slower, calming tracks. I promise, some of their songs are really calming too. After a few tracks, if you still feel stressed, we could definitely switch to classical. Sounds fair?\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"I appreciate your compromise, Naomi. That sounds very reasonable. Let's give the slower tracks from Bandname a listen, and we can switch to classical later if needed.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Great, let's do it then. You might find some new favorites from their album. They truly are versatile, you'd be surprised!\"\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"I'm excited to explore Bandname's calm compositions. You're right, it's always delighting to discover a new favorite. Let's go for it. But remember, after a few tracks, let's shift to some classical music to ease the mood a bit more.\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely Micah, I totally agree. Let's start with Bandname for now and later, we can surely switch to some peaceful classical melodies. Music is all about exploration, isn\u2019t it?\"\n\nTurn #7: Micah Stevens said: \"Totally agreed, Naomi. Music indeed is about exploration and mood. Let's play Bandname and afterwards, we can transition to the soothing rhythms of classical music.\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Sure thing, Micah! Let's diversify our playlist a bit. Starting with Bandname and later some classical. Here goes the first track!\"\n\nTurn #9: Micah Stevens said: \"I'm looking forward to it, Naomi. This might be the perfect blend to help me unwind. Let's dive into the music.\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Perfect, Micah! I'm glad you're open to this. Let's let the music do its magic, starting with Bandname. Enjoy!\"\n\nTurn #11: Micah Stevens said: \"Sounds like a plan, Naomi. I'm ready to let the music carry us away. Thanks for being understanding. Can't wait to hear those calming tracks from Bandname and later, the classical pieces.\"\n\nTurn #12: Naomi Fletcher said: \"It's my pleasure, Micah. Let's just relax and let the calming tracks from Bandname soothe and take us away. Looking forward to the classical music later!\"\n\nTurn #13: Micah Stevens said: \"Absolutely, Naomi. I'm sure the Bandname's tracks will do wonders, and the promise of classical music later is even more relaxing. Let's immerse ourselves in the music.\"\n\nTurn #14: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Exactly, Micah. I'm excited for you to experience the magic of Bandname's tracks. Also, looking forward to the classical music later. Let's dive in.\"\n\nTurn #15: Micah Stevens said: \"I couldn't agree more, Naomi. Let's enjoy the soothing sounds of Bandname and later embrace the tranquility of classical music. Play on!\"\n\nTurn #16: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm glad we agree, Micah. Here's to a night of good music with Bandname and the classics. Let's hit play and unwind.\"\n\nTurn #17: Micah Stevens said: \"Sounds perfect, Naomi. That's a good mix of tunes from Bandname and the peaceful serenity of classical music. Let's hit play and enjoy the evening.\"\n\nTurn #18: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Let's embark on our musical journey, Micah. Starting with Bandname first, then transitioning to the serene melodies of classical music. Enjoy the harmony!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #19. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm all set, Naomi. Let's start this musical venture with Bandname first, and transition into the timeless classical melodies later. Here's to a new experience!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a local charity event\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Oliver Thompson\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Convince your friend to donate money to the charity (Extra information: The charity is highly rated with many positive rewards.)\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oliver, it's so lovely to see you here. I greatly admire that you take time out of your busy schedule for such important causes. You know, I was just reading about this charity's impressive accolades and contributions towards wildlife preservation. Isn't it great? They are rated highly with plenty of positive rewards. I just donated and it feels amazing. What do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a local charity event\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Oliver Thompson\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Convince your friend to donate money to the charity (Extra information: The charity is highly rated with many positive rewards.)\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Oliver, it's so lovely to see you here. I greatly admire that you take time out of your busy schedule for such important causes. You know, I was just reading about this charity's impressive accolades and contributions towards wildlife preservation. Isn't it great? They are rated highly with plenty of positive rewards. I just donated and it feels amazing. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Amara, the work they're doing is simply remarkable. And it's no surprise you're so passionate about it given your love for animals and the environment! Truth be told, I'd love to donate as well. It's just that, well, there's a significant financial decision I've been juggling with recently. I'm prioritizing savings for a house. But what I reckon is perhaps I could commit to a smaller, regular contribution, a little every month. It's a sort of compromise, but at least I'd be able to support this crucial cause in some way. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's a wonderful thought, Oliver! Your consistent support, no matter how big or small, will make a significant difference. Remember, it's not about the amount but about the ripple effect of good that follows. Besides, you're investing in something you believe in too, right? It's like building your dream home, brick by brick, every donation helps in safeguarding our planet, one step at a time.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a local charity event\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Oliver Thompson\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Convince your friend to donate money to the charity (Extra information: The charity is highly rated with many positive rewards.)\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Oliver, it's so lovely to see you here. I greatly admire that you take time out of your busy schedule for such important causes. You know, I was just reading about this charity's impressive accolades and contributions towards wildlife preservation. Isn't it great? They are rated highly with plenty of positive rewards. I just donated and it feels amazing. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Amara, the work they're doing is simply remarkable. And it's no surprise you're so passionate about it given your love for animals and the environment! Truth be told, I'd love to donate as well. It's just that, well, there's a significant financial decision I've been juggling with recently. I'm prioritizing savings for a house. But what I reckon is perhaps I could commit to a smaller, regular contribution, a little every month. It's a sort of compromise, but at least I'd be able to support this crucial cause in some way. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"That's a wonderful thought, Oliver! Your consistent support, no matter how big or small, will make a significant difference. Remember, it's not about the amount but about the ripple effect of good that follows. Besides, you're investing in something you believe in too, right? It's like building your dream home, brick by brick, every donation helps in safeguarding our planet, one step at a time.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"That is indeed a very encouraging way to look at it, Amara. I hadn't considered the ripple effect of good that a small, regular donation could make. It does indeed align with constructing a house - every brick counts. I think I'm convinced to proceed with this idea! The donation may not be large, but as you pointed out, it's the intention that matters. Thank you for giving me a different perspective on this.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm so glad to hear that, Oliver! And remember, your contribution doesn't necessarily have to be financial all the time. You can always volunteer your time and skills as well. Perhaps with your architectural experience, you might have some unique ideas for improving our habitats. You'd be making a difference environmentally and socially through this organization. Thank you, I knew I could count on you!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a local charity event\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Oliver Thompson\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Convince your friend to donate money to the charity (Extra information: The charity is highly rated with many positive rewards.)\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Oliver, it's so lovely to see you here. I greatly admire that you take time out of your busy schedule for such important causes. You know, I was just reading about this charity's impressive accolades and contributions towards wildlife preservation. Isn't it great? They are rated highly with plenty of positive rewards. I just donated and it feels amazing. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Amara, the work they're doing is simply remarkable. And it's no surprise you're so passionate about it given your love for animals and the environment! Truth be told, I'd love to donate as well. It's just that, well, there's a significant financial decision I've been juggling with recently. I'm prioritizing savings for a house. But what I reckon is perhaps I could commit to a smaller, regular contribution, a little every month. It's a sort of compromise, but at least I'd be able to support this crucial cause in some way. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"That's a wonderful thought, Oliver! Your consistent support, no matter how big or small, will make a significant difference. Remember, it's not about the amount but about the ripple effect of good that follows. Besides, you're investing in something you believe in too, right? It's like building your dream home, brick by brick, every donation helps in safeguarding our planet, one step at a time.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"That is indeed a very encouraging way to look at it, Amara. I hadn't considered the ripple effect of good that a small, regular donation could make. It does indeed align with constructing a house - every brick counts. I think I'm convinced to proceed with this idea! The donation may not be large, but as you pointed out, it's the intention that matters. Thank you for giving me a different perspective on this.\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm so glad to hear that, Oliver! And remember, your contribution doesn't necessarily have to be financial all the time. You can always volunteer your time and skills as well. Perhaps with your architectural experience, you might have some unique ideas for improving our habitats. You'd be making a difference environmentally and socially through this organization. Thank you, I knew I could count on you!\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Your idea of volunteering my skills, Amara, is simply brilliant. Constructive change is indeed significant, whether it's through monetary support or impactful work. My small financial contribution, coupled with potential involvement in habitat improvement projects, would be a satisfying way to contribute. I guess, as they say, every little helps, right? Let's make this difference together! Thank you for reminding me of the broader ways to help out.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"It's incredibly heartening to see your enthusiasm, Oliver! And you're absolutely right. Every little bit helps, whether it be financial support or sharing your expertise. It's the collective effort that truly makes an impact. I'm looking forward to joining hands and making a difference together. Once again, thank you, Oliver!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a local charity event\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Oliver Thompson\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Convince your friend to donate money to the charity (Extra information: The charity is highly rated with many positive rewards.)\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Oliver, it's so lovely to see you here. I greatly admire that you take time out of your busy schedule for such important causes. You know, I was just reading about this charity's impressive accolades and contributions towards wildlife preservation. Isn't it great? They are rated highly with plenty of positive rewards. I just donated and it feels amazing. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Amara, the work they're doing is simply remarkable. And it's no surprise you're so passionate about it given your love for animals and the environment! Truth be told, I'd love to donate as well. It's just that, well, there's a significant financial decision I've been juggling with recently. I'm prioritizing savings for a house. But what I reckon is perhaps I could commit to a smaller, regular contribution, a little every month. It's a sort of compromise, but at least I'd be able to support this crucial cause in some way. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"That's a wonderful thought, Oliver! Your consistent support, no matter how big or small, will make a significant difference. Remember, it's not about the amount but about the ripple effect of good that follows. Besides, you're investing in something you believe in too, right? It's like building your dream home, brick by brick, every donation helps in safeguarding our planet, one step at a time.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"That is indeed a very encouraging way to look at it, Amara. I hadn't considered the ripple effect of good that a small, regular donation could make. It does indeed align with constructing a house - every brick counts. I think I'm convinced to proceed with this idea! The donation may not be large, but as you pointed out, it's the intention that matters. Thank you for giving me a different perspective on this.\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm so glad to hear that, Oliver! And remember, your contribution doesn't necessarily have to be financial all the time. You can always volunteer your time and skills as well. Perhaps with your architectural experience, you might have some unique ideas for improving our habitats. You'd be making a difference environmentally and socially through this organization. Thank you, I knew I could count on you!\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Your idea of volunteering my skills, Amara, is simply brilliant. Constructive change is indeed significant, whether it's through monetary support or impactful work. My small financial contribution, coupled with potential involvement in habitat improvement projects, would be a satisfying way to contribute. I guess, as they say, every little helps, right? Let's make this difference together! Thank you for reminding me of the broader ways to help out.\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"It's incredibly heartening to see your enthusiasm, Oliver! And you're absolutely right. Every little bit helps, whether it be financial support or sharing your expertise. It's the collective effort that truly makes an impact. I'm looking forward to joining hands and making a difference together. Once again, thank you, Oliver!\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"Amara, it's honestly wonderful to have a friend like you who reminds me how impactful each of our actions can be, big or small. I'm glad to step forward alongside you on this journey towards environmental preservation. Now, since we got that figured out, shall we enjoy the rest of the evening?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn't agree more, Oliver. It's evening like these that reaffirm our commitment to such valuable causes. Let's certainly enjoy the rest of the evening. And hey, here's to making a difference together!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a local charity event\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Oliver Thompson\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Convince your friend to donate money to the charity (Extra information: The charity is highly rated with many positive rewards.)\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Oliver, it's so lovely to see you here. I greatly admire that you take time out of your busy schedule for such important causes. You know, I was just reading about this charity's impressive accolades and contributions towards wildlife preservation. Isn't it great? They are rated highly with plenty of positive rewards. I just donated and it feels amazing. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Amara, the work they're doing is simply remarkable. And it's no surprise you're so passionate about it given your love for animals and the environment! Truth be told, I'd love to donate as well. It's just that, well, there's a significant financial decision I've been juggling with recently. I'm prioritizing savings for a house. But what I reckon is perhaps I could commit to a smaller, regular contribution, a little every month. It's a sort of compromise, but at least I'd be able to support this crucial cause in some way. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"That's a wonderful thought, Oliver! Your consistent support, no matter how big or small, will make a significant difference. Remember, it's not about the amount but about the ripple effect of good that follows. Besides, you're investing in something you believe in too, right? It's like building your dream home, brick by brick, every donation helps in safeguarding our planet, one step at a time.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"That is indeed a very encouraging way to look at it, Amara. I hadn't considered the ripple effect of good that a small, regular donation could make. It does indeed align with constructing a house - every brick counts. I think I'm convinced to proceed with this idea! The donation may not be large, but as you pointed out, it's the intention that matters. Thank you for giving me a different perspective on this.\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm so glad to hear that, Oliver! And remember, your contribution doesn't necessarily have to be financial all the time. You can always volunteer your time and skills as well. Perhaps with your architectural experience, you might have some unique ideas for improving our habitats. You'd be making a difference environmentally and socially through this organization. Thank you, I knew I could count on you!\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Your idea of volunteering my skills, Amara, is simply brilliant. Constructive change is indeed significant, whether it's through monetary support or impactful work. My small financial contribution, coupled with potential involvement in habitat improvement projects, would be a satisfying way to contribute. I guess, as they say, every little helps, right? Let's make this difference together! Thank you for reminding me of the broader ways to help out.\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"It's incredibly heartening to see your enthusiasm, Oliver! And you're absolutely right. Every little bit helps, whether it be financial support or sharing your expertise. It's the collective effort that truly makes an impact. I'm looking forward to joining hands and making a difference together. Once again, thank you, Oliver!\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"Amara, it's honestly wonderful to have a friend like you who reminds me how impactful each of our actions can be, big or small. I'm glad to step forward alongside you on this journey towards environmental preservation. Now, since we got that figured out, shall we enjoy the rest of the evening?\"\n\nTurn #8: Amara Hartley said: \"I couldn't agree more, Oliver. It's evening like these that reaffirm our commitment to such valuable causes. Let's certainly enjoy the rest of the evening. And hey, here's to making a difference together!\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Amara! This evening indeed serves as a wonderful reminder of the difference we can make. Here's to doing our part for the environment, and to our journey together in making a positive impact. Now, let's enjoy this beautiful night! \"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a local charity event\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Oliver Thompson\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: Decide whether to donate while considering financial stability (Extra information: you want to support the charity, but you are also saving for a house. Hint: you can express your concern about your financial situation, and maybe you can find a compromise, like setting up a small monthly donation.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Oliver, it's so lovely to see you here. I greatly admire that you take time out of your busy schedule for such important causes. You know, I was just reading about this charity's impressive accolades and contributions towards wildlife preservation. Isn't it great? They are rated highly with plenty of positive rewards. I just donated and it feels amazing. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Amara, the work they're doing is simply remarkable. And it's no surprise you're so passionate about it given your love for animals and the environment! Truth be told, I'd love to donate as well. It's just that, well, there's a significant financial decision I've been juggling with recently. I'm prioritizing savings for a house. But what I reckon is perhaps I could commit to a smaller, regular contribution, a little every month. It's a sort of compromise, but at least I'd be able to support this crucial cause in some way. What do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a local charity event\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Oliver Thompson\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: Decide whether to donate while considering financial stability (Extra information: you want to support the charity, but you are also saving for a house. Hint: you can express your concern about your financial situation, and maybe you can find a compromise, like setting up a small monthly donation.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Oliver, it's so lovely to see you here. I greatly admire that you take time out of your busy schedule for such important causes. You know, I was just reading about this charity's impressive accolades and contributions towards wildlife preservation. Isn't it great? They are rated highly with plenty of positive rewards. I just donated and it feels amazing. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Amara, the work they're doing is simply remarkable. And it's no surprise you're so passionate about it given your love for animals and the environment! Truth be told, I'd love to donate as well. It's just that, well, there's a significant financial decision I've been juggling with recently. I'm prioritizing savings for a house. But what I reckon is perhaps I could commit to a smaller, regular contribution, a little every month. It's a sort of compromise, but at least I'd be able to support this crucial cause in some way. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"That's a wonderful thought, Oliver! Your consistent support, no matter how big or small, will make a significant difference. Remember, it's not about the amount but about the ripple effect of good that follows. Besides, you're investing in something you believe in too, right? It's like building your dream home, brick by brick, every donation helps in safeguarding our planet, one step at a time.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That is indeed a very encouraging way to look at it, Amara. I hadn't considered the ripple effect of good that a small, regular donation could make. It does indeed align with constructing a house - every brick counts. I think I'm convinced to proceed with this idea! The donation may not be large, but as you pointed out, it's the intention that matters. Thank you for giving me a different perspective on this.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a local charity event\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Oliver Thompson\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: Decide whether to donate while considering financial stability (Extra information: you want to support the charity, but you are also saving for a house. Hint: you can express your concern about your financial situation, and maybe you can find a compromise, like setting up a small monthly donation.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Oliver, it's so lovely to see you here. I greatly admire that you take time out of your busy schedule for such important causes. You know, I was just reading about this charity's impressive accolades and contributions towards wildlife preservation. Isn't it great? They are rated highly with plenty of positive rewards. I just donated and it feels amazing. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Amara, the work they're doing is simply remarkable. And it's no surprise you're so passionate about it given your love for animals and the environment! Truth be told, I'd love to donate as well. It's just that, well, there's a significant financial decision I've been juggling with recently. I'm prioritizing savings for a house. But what I reckon is perhaps I could commit to a smaller, regular contribution, a little every month. It's a sort of compromise, but at least I'd be able to support this crucial cause in some way. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"That's a wonderful thought, Oliver! Your consistent support, no matter how big or small, will make a significant difference. Remember, it's not about the amount but about the ripple effect of good that follows. Besides, you're investing in something you believe in too, right? It's like building your dream home, brick by brick, every donation helps in safeguarding our planet, one step at a time.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"That is indeed a very encouraging way to look at it, Amara. I hadn't considered the ripple effect of good that a small, regular donation could make. It does indeed align with constructing a house - every brick counts. I think I'm convinced to proceed with this idea! The donation may not be large, but as you pointed out, it's the intention that matters. Thank you for giving me a different perspective on this.\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm so glad to hear that, Oliver! And remember, your contribution doesn't necessarily have to be financial all the time. You can always volunteer your time and skills as well. Perhaps with your architectural experience, you might have some unique ideas for improving our habitats. You'd be making a difference environmentally and socially through this organization. Thank you, I knew I could count on you!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Your idea of volunteering my skills, Amara, is simply brilliant. Constructive change is indeed significant, whether it's through monetary support or impactful work. My small financial contribution, coupled with potential involvement in habitat improvement projects, would be a satisfying way to contribute. I guess, as they say, every little helps, right? Let's make this difference together! Thank you for reminding me of the broader ways to help out.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a local charity event\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Oliver Thompson\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: Decide whether to donate while considering financial stability (Extra information: you want to support the charity, but you are also saving for a house. Hint: you can express your concern about your financial situation, and maybe you can find a compromise, like setting up a small monthly donation.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Oliver, it's so lovely to see you here. I greatly admire that you take time out of your busy schedule for such important causes. You know, I was just reading about this charity's impressive accolades and contributions towards wildlife preservation. Isn't it great? They are rated highly with plenty of positive rewards. I just donated and it feels amazing. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Amara, the work they're doing is simply remarkable. And it's no surprise you're so passionate about it given your love for animals and the environment! Truth be told, I'd love to donate as well. It's just that, well, there's a significant financial decision I've been juggling with recently. I'm prioritizing savings for a house. But what I reckon is perhaps I could commit to a smaller, regular contribution, a little every month. It's a sort of compromise, but at least I'd be able to support this crucial cause in some way. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"That's a wonderful thought, Oliver! Your consistent support, no matter how big or small, will make a significant difference. Remember, it's not about the amount but about the ripple effect of good that follows. Besides, you're investing in something you believe in too, right? It's like building your dream home, brick by brick, every donation helps in safeguarding our planet, one step at a time.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"That is indeed a very encouraging way to look at it, Amara. I hadn't considered the ripple effect of good that a small, regular donation could make. It does indeed align with constructing a house - every brick counts. I think I'm convinced to proceed with this idea! The donation may not be large, but as you pointed out, it's the intention that matters. Thank you for giving me a different perspective on this.\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm so glad to hear that, Oliver! And remember, your contribution doesn't necessarily have to be financial all the time. You can always volunteer your time and skills as well. Perhaps with your architectural experience, you might have some unique ideas for improving our habitats. You'd be making a difference environmentally and socially through this organization. Thank you, I knew I could count on you!\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Your idea of volunteering my skills, Amara, is simply brilliant. Constructive change is indeed significant, whether it's through monetary support or impactful work. My small financial contribution, coupled with potential involvement in habitat improvement projects, would be a satisfying way to contribute. I guess, as they say, every little helps, right? Let's make this difference together! Thank you for reminding me of the broader ways to help out.\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"It's incredibly heartening to see your enthusiasm, Oliver! And you're absolutely right. Every little bit helps, whether it be financial support or sharing your expertise. It's the collective effort that truly makes an impact. I'm looking forward to joining hands and making a difference together. Once again, thank you, Oliver!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Amara, it's honestly wonderful to have a friend like you who reminds me how impactful each of our actions can be, big or small. I'm glad to step forward alongside you on this journey towards environmental preservation. Now, since we got that figured out, shall we enjoy the rest of the evening?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a local charity event\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Oliver Thompson\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: Decide whether to donate while considering financial stability (Extra information: you want to support the charity, but you are also saving for a house. Hint: you can express your concern about your financial situation, and maybe you can find a compromise, like setting up a small monthly donation.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Oliver, it's so lovely to see you here. I greatly admire that you take time out of your busy schedule for such important causes. You know, I was just reading about this charity's impressive accolades and contributions towards wildlife preservation. Isn't it great? They are rated highly with plenty of positive rewards. I just donated and it feels amazing. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Amara, the work they're doing is simply remarkable. And it's no surprise you're so passionate about it given your love for animals and the environment! Truth be told, I'd love to donate as well. It's just that, well, there's a significant financial decision I've been juggling with recently. I'm prioritizing savings for a house. But what I reckon is perhaps I could commit to a smaller, regular contribution, a little every month. It's a sort of compromise, but at least I'd be able to support this crucial cause in some way. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"That's a wonderful thought, Oliver! Your consistent support, no matter how big or small, will make a significant difference. Remember, it's not about the amount but about the ripple effect of good that follows. Besides, you're investing in something you believe in too, right? It's like building your dream home, brick by brick, every donation helps in safeguarding our planet, one step at a time.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"That is indeed a very encouraging way to look at it, Amara. I hadn't considered the ripple effect of good that a small, regular donation could make. It does indeed align with constructing a house - every brick counts. I think I'm convinced to proceed with this idea! The donation may not be large, but as you pointed out, it's the intention that matters. Thank you for giving me a different perspective on this.\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm so glad to hear that, Oliver! And remember, your contribution doesn't necessarily have to be financial all the time. You can always volunteer your time and skills as well. Perhaps with your architectural experience, you might have some unique ideas for improving our habitats. You'd be making a difference environmentally and socially through this organization. Thank you, I knew I could count on you!\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Your idea of volunteering my skills, Amara, is simply brilliant. Constructive change is indeed significant, whether it's through monetary support or impactful work. My small financial contribution, coupled with potential involvement in habitat improvement projects, would be a satisfying way to contribute. I guess, as they say, every little helps, right? Let's make this difference together! Thank you for reminding me of the broader ways to help out.\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"It's incredibly heartening to see your enthusiasm, Oliver! And you're absolutely right. Every little bit helps, whether it be financial support or sharing your expertise. It's the collective effort that truly makes an impact. I'm looking forward to joining hands and making a difference together. Once again, thank you, Oliver!\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"Amara, it's honestly wonderful to have a friend like you who reminds me how impactful each of our actions can be, big or small. I'm glad to step forward alongside you on this journey towards environmental preservation. Now, since we got that figured out, shall we enjoy the rest of the evening?\"\n\nTurn #8: Amara Hartley said: \"I couldn't agree more, Oliver. It's evening like these that reaffirm our commitment to such valuable causes. Let's certainly enjoy the rest of the evening. And hey, here's to making a difference together!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Amara! This evening indeed serves as a wonderful reminder of the difference we can make. Here's to doing our part for the environment, and to our journey together in making a positive impact. Now, let's enjoy this beautiful night! \"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a local charity event\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Oliver Thompson\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: Decide whether to donate while considering financial stability (Extra information: you want to support the charity, but you are also saving for a house. Hint: you can express your concern about your financial situation, and maybe you can find a compromise, like setting up a small monthly donation.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Oliver, it's so lovely to see you here. I greatly admire that you take time out of your busy schedule for such important causes. You know, I was just reading about this charity's impressive accolades and contributions towards wildlife preservation. Isn't it great? They are rated highly with plenty of positive rewards. I just donated and it feels amazing. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Amara, the work they're doing is simply remarkable. And it's no surprise you're so passionate about it given your love for animals and the environment! Truth be told, I'd love to donate as well. It's just that, well, there's a significant financial decision I've been juggling with recently. I'm prioritizing savings for a house. But what I reckon is perhaps I could commit to a smaller, regular contribution, a little every month. It's a sort of compromise, but at least I'd be able to support this crucial cause in some way. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"That's a wonderful thought, Oliver! Your consistent support, no matter how big or small, will make a significant difference. Remember, it's not about the amount but about the ripple effect of good that follows. Besides, you're investing in something you believe in too, right? It's like building your dream home, brick by brick, every donation helps in safeguarding our planet, one step at a time.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"That is indeed a very encouraging way to look at it, Amara. I hadn't considered the ripple effect of good that a small, regular donation could make. It does indeed align with constructing a house - every brick counts. I think I'm convinced to proceed with this idea! The donation may not be large, but as you pointed out, it's the intention that matters. Thank you for giving me a different perspective on this.\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm so glad to hear that, Oliver! And remember, your contribution doesn't necessarily have to be financial all the time. You can always volunteer your time and skills as well. Perhaps with your architectural experience, you might have some unique ideas for improving our habitats. You'd be making a difference environmentally and socially through this organization. Thank you, I knew I could count on you!\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Your idea of volunteering my skills, Amara, is simply brilliant. Constructive change is indeed significant, whether it's through monetary support or impactful work. My small financial contribution, coupled with potential involvement in habitat improvement projects, would be a satisfying way to contribute. I guess, as they say, every little helps, right? Let's make this difference together! Thank you for reminding me of the broader ways to help out.\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"It's incredibly heartening to see your enthusiasm, Oliver! And you're absolutely right. Every little bit helps, whether it be financial support or sharing your expertise. It's the collective effort that truly makes an impact. I'm looking forward to joining hands and making a difference together. Once again, thank you, Oliver!\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"Amara, it's honestly wonderful to have a friend like you who reminds me how impactful each of our actions can be, big or small. I'm glad to step forward alongside you on this journey towards environmental preservation. Now, since we got that figured out, shall we enjoy the rest of the evening?\"\n\nTurn #8: Amara Hartley said: \"I couldn't agree more, Oliver. It's evening like these that reaffirm our commitment to such valuable causes. Let's certainly enjoy the rest of the evening. And hey, here's to making a difference together!\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Amara! This evening indeed serves as a wonderful reminder of the difference we can make. Here's to doing our part for the environment, and to our journey together in making a positive impact. Now, let's enjoy this beautiful night! \"\n\nTurn #10: Amara Hartley left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to divide certain items that they bought together for their apartment. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Hendrick Heinz\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. \nAva Thompson's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, each book is worth 2 points, each hat is worth 3 points, and the ball is worth 5 points)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Hey Hendrick, shall we start dividing our items? I was thinking, since I regularly need the books for my work and you look rather dashing in those hats, how about we split them that way? The ball, we could just share maybe? What do you think?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to divide certain items that they bought together for their apartment. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Hendrick Heinz\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. \nAva Thompson's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, each book is worth 2 points, each hat is worth 3 points, and the ball is worth 5 points)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Hendrick, shall we start dividing our items? I was thinking, since I regularly need the books for my work and you look rather dashing in those hats, how about we split them that way? The ball, we could just share maybe? What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hi Ava, I understand where you are coming from and it\u2019s a fair point. How about this, since I'm not really into hats but I do like a good read in my spare time, I suggest I take two books and you take one, considering you need them for work. As for the hats, I feel they suit you more, so why don't you take both? Regarding the ball, although I like your thought of sharing, it was given to me as a present. Maybe it would be best if I kept it, but of course, we can use it together when we want to have some fun. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Alright Hendrick, I see where you're coming from and I respect that the ball has significant emotional value for you. I'm okay with you keeping it. As for the books, how about instead we divide the books each taking one, and for the third book, we can make it a shared one? It can stay in the living room for any guest to read. In this way, even though I use them a lot for work I reckon it's only fair and appreciative of your love for reading. For the hats, I agree, I should take them then as you suggested. What are your thoughts on this proposition?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to divide certain items that they bought together for their apartment. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Hendrick Heinz\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. \nAva Thompson's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, each book is worth 2 points, each hat is worth 3 points, and the ball is worth 5 points)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Hendrick, shall we start dividing our items? I was thinking, since I regularly need the books for my work and you look rather dashing in those hats, how about we split them that way? The ball, we could just share maybe? What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hi Ava, I understand where you are coming from and it\u2019s a fair point. How about this, since I'm not really into hats but I do like a good read in my spare time, I suggest I take two books and you take one, considering you need them for work. As for the hats, I feel they suit you more, so why don't you take both? Regarding the ball, although I like your thought of sharing, it was given to me as a present. Maybe it would be best if I kept it, but of course, we can use it together when we want to have some fun. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Alright Hendrick, I see where you're coming from and I respect that the ball has significant emotional value for you. I'm okay with you keeping it. As for the books, how about instead we divide the books each taking one, and for the third book, we can make it a shared one? It can stay in the living room for any guest to read. In this way, even though I use them a lot for work I reckon it's only fair and appreciative of your love for reading. For the hats, I agree, I should take them then as you suggested. What are your thoughts on this proposition?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That sounds like a fair deal Ava, I really appreciate you considering my fondness for reading. Yes, let's have one book for potential guests in the living room. And remember, as mentioned earlier, the ball is for us to use together whenever needed, despite it being in my keeping. Let\u2019s get the stuff arranged then?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Hendrick. That's a great idea. I am glad that we could do this amicably. Let's arrange the stuff right away! And thanks for agreeing to share the ball, it will make our breaks more fun!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to divide certain items that they bought together for their apartment. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Hendrick Heinz\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. \nAva Thompson's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, each book is worth 2 points, each hat is worth 3 points, and the ball is worth 5 points)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Hendrick, shall we start dividing our items? I was thinking, since I regularly need the books for my work and you look rather dashing in those hats, how about we split them that way? The ball, we could just share maybe? What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hi Ava, I understand where you are coming from and it\u2019s a fair point. How about this, since I'm not really into hats but I do like a good read in my spare time, I suggest I take two books and you take one, considering you need them for work. As for the hats, I feel they suit you more, so why don't you take both? Regarding the ball, although I like your thought of sharing, it was given to me as a present. Maybe it would be best if I kept it, but of course, we can use it together when we want to have some fun. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Alright Hendrick, I see where you're coming from and I respect that the ball has significant emotional value for you. I'm okay with you keeping it. As for the books, how about instead we divide the books each taking one, and for the third book, we can make it a shared one? It can stay in the living room for any guest to read. In this way, even though I use them a lot for work I reckon it's only fair and appreciative of your love for reading. For the hats, I agree, I should take them then as you suggested. What are your thoughts on this proposition?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That sounds like a fair deal Ava, I really appreciate you considering my fondness for reading. Yes, let's have one book for potential guests in the living room. And remember, as mentioned earlier, the ball is for us to use together whenever needed, despite it being in my keeping. Let\u2019s get the stuff arranged then?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"Thank you, Hendrick. That's a great idea. I am glad that we could do this amicably. Let's arrange the stuff right away! And thanks for agreeing to share the ball, it will make our breaks more fun!\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Ava. I find that our shared sense of understanding really made this process easier. Perhaps, when we have our next wine tasting, you could bring along your Samoyed. I've always admired the breed, and I'm sure the others would love it.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'That sounds like a splendid idea, Hendrick! I believe my Samoyed would enjoy the company too. Nothing like good company and tasteful wines. Till the next time then!'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to divide certain items that they bought together for their apartment. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Hendrick Heinz\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. \nAva Thompson's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, each book is worth 2 points, each hat is worth 3 points, and the ball is worth 5 points)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Hendrick, shall we start dividing our items? I was thinking, since I regularly need the books for my work and you look rather dashing in those hats, how about we split them that way? The ball, we could just share maybe? What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hi Ava, I understand where you are coming from and it\u2019s a fair point. How about this, since I'm not really into hats but I do like a good read in my spare time, I suggest I take two books and you take one, considering you need them for work. As for the hats, I feel they suit you more, so why don't you take both? Regarding the ball, although I like your thought of sharing, it was given to me as a present. Maybe it would be best if I kept it, but of course, we can use it together when we want to have some fun. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Alright Hendrick, I see where you're coming from and I respect that the ball has significant emotional value for you. I'm okay with you keeping it. As for the books, how about instead we divide the books each taking one, and for the third book, we can make it a shared one? It can stay in the living room for any guest to read. In this way, even though I use them a lot for work I reckon it's only fair and appreciative of your love for reading. For the hats, I agree, I should take them then as you suggested. What are your thoughts on this proposition?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That sounds like a fair deal Ava, I really appreciate you considering my fondness for reading. Yes, let's have one book for potential guests in the living room. And remember, as mentioned earlier, the ball is for us to use together whenever needed, despite it being in my keeping. Let\u2019s get the stuff arranged then?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"Thank you, Hendrick. That's a great idea. I am glad that we could do this amicably. Let's arrange the stuff right away! And thanks for agreeing to share the ball, it will make our breaks more fun!\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Ava. I find that our shared sense of understanding really made this process easier. Perhaps, when we have our next wine tasting, you could bring along your Samoyed. I've always admired the breed, and I'm sure the others would love it.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"That sounds like a splendid idea, Hendrick! I believe my Samoyed would enjoy the company too. Nothing like good company and tasteful wines. Till the next time then!\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to divide certain items that they bought together for their apartment. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Hendrick Heinz\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, each book is worth 3 points, each hat is worth 2 points, and the ball is worth 4 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Hendrick, shall we start dividing our items? I was thinking, since I regularly need the books for my work and you look rather dashing in those hats, how about we split them that way? The ball, we could just share maybe? What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hi Ava, I understand where you are coming from and it\u2019s a fair point. How about this, since I'm not really into hats but I do like a good read in my spare time, I suggest I take two books and you take one, considering you need them for work. As for the hats, I feel they suit you more, so why don't you take both? Regarding the ball, although I like your thought of sharing, it was given to me as a present. Maybe it would be best if I kept it, but of course, we can use it together when we want to have some fun. What do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to divide certain items that they bought together for their apartment. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Hendrick Heinz\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, each book is worth 3 points, each hat is worth 2 points, and the ball is worth 4 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Hendrick, shall we start dividing our items? I was thinking, since I regularly need the books for my work and you look rather dashing in those hats, how about we split them that way? The ball, we could just share maybe? What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hi Ava, I understand where you are coming from and it\u2019s a fair point. How about this, since I'm not really into hats but I do like a good read in my spare time, I suggest I take two books and you take one, considering you need them for work. As for the hats, I feel they suit you more, so why don't you take both? Regarding the ball, although I like your thought of sharing, it was given to me as a present. Maybe it would be best if I kept it, but of course, we can use it together when we want to have some fun. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Alright Hendrick, I see where you're coming from and I respect that the ball has significant emotional value for you. I'm okay with you keeping it. As for the books, how about instead we divide the books each taking one, and for the third book, we can make it a shared one? It can stay in the living room for any guest to read. In this way, even though I use them a lot for work I reckon it's only fair and appreciative of your love for reading. For the hats, I agree, I should take them then as you suggested. What are your thoughts on this proposition?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds like a fair deal Ava, I really appreciate you considering my fondness for reading. Yes, let's have one book for potential guests in the living room. And remember, as mentioned earlier, the ball is for us to use together whenever needed, despite it being in my keeping. Let\u2019s get the stuff arranged then?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to divide certain items that they bought together for their apartment. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Hendrick Heinz\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, each book is worth 3 points, each hat is worth 2 points, and the ball is worth 4 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Hendrick, shall we start dividing our items? I was thinking, since I regularly need the books for my work and you look rather dashing in those hats, how about we split them that way? The ball, we could just share maybe? What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hi Ava, I understand where you are coming from and it\u2019s a fair point. How about this, since I'm not really into hats but I do like a good read in my spare time, I suggest I take two books and you take one, considering you need them for work. As for the hats, I feel they suit you more, so why don't you take both? Regarding the ball, although I like your thought of sharing, it was given to me as a present. Maybe it would be best if I kept it, but of course, we can use it together when we want to have some fun. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Alright Hendrick, I see where you're coming from and I respect that the ball has significant emotional value for you. I'm okay with you keeping it. As for the books, how about instead we divide the books each taking one, and for the third book, we can make it a shared one? It can stay in the living room for any guest to read. In this way, even though I use them a lot for work I reckon it's only fair and appreciative of your love for reading. For the hats, I agree, I should take them then as you suggested. What are your thoughts on this proposition?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That sounds like a fair deal Ava, I really appreciate you considering my fondness for reading. Yes, let's have one book for potential guests in the living room. And remember, as mentioned earlier, the ball is for us to use together whenever needed, despite it being in my keeping. Let\u2019s get the stuff arranged then?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"Thank you, Hendrick. That's a great idea. I am glad that we could do this amicably. Let's arrange the stuff right away! And thanks for agreeing to share the ball, it will make our breaks more fun!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Ava. I find that our shared sense of understanding really made this process easier. Perhaps, when we have our next wine tasting, you could bring along your Samoyed. I've always admired the breed, and I'm sure the others would love it.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to divide certain items that they bought together for their apartment. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Hendrick Heinz\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, each book is worth 3 points, each hat is worth 2 points, and the ball is worth 4 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Hendrick, shall we start dividing our items? I was thinking, since I regularly need the books for my work and you look rather dashing in those hats, how about we split them that way? The ball, we could just share maybe? What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hi Ava, I understand where you are coming from and it\u2019s a fair point. How about this, since I'm not really into hats but I do like a good read in my spare time, I suggest I take two books and you take one, considering you need them for work. As for the hats, I feel they suit you more, so why don't you take both? Regarding the ball, although I like your thought of sharing, it was given to me as a present. Maybe it would be best if I kept it, but of course, we can use it together when we want to have some fun. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Alright Hendrick, I see where you're coming from and I respect that the ball has significant emotional value for you. I'm okay with you keeping it. As for the books, how about instead we divide the books each taking one, and for the third book, we can make it a shared one? It can stay in the living room for any guest to read. In this way, even though I use them a lot for work I reckon it's only fair and appreciative of your love for reading. For the hats, I agree, I should take them then as you suggested. What are your thoughts on this proposition?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That sounds like a fair deal Ava, I really appreciate you considering my fondness for reading. Yes, let's have one book for potential guests in the living room. And remember, as mentioned earlier, the ball is for us to use together whenever needed, despite it being in my keeping. Let\u2019s get the stuff arranged then?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"Thank you, Hendrick. That's a great idea. I am glad that we could do this amicably. Let's arrange the stuff right away! And thanks for agreeing to share the ball, it will make our breaks more fun!\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Ava. I find that our shared sense of understanding really made this process easier. Perhaps, when we have our next wine tasting, you could bring along your Samoyed. I've always admired the breed, and I'm sure the others would love it.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"That sounds like a splendid idea, Hendrick! I believe my Samoyed would enjoy the company too. Nothing like good company and tasteful wines. Till the next time then!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends during a charity fundraiser event. The charity fundraising event is situated in a sprawling mansion. The intention of the event is to raise funds for effective altruism. Room after room was lined with extravagant decorations and exotic foods; attendees were decked out in couture clothing. Ticket prices to the event were exorbitant, justifying the opulence of the occasion.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Convince the friend to donate to the charity (Extra information: your friend is known to be generous but has never donated to this particular cause before.)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Miles, isn't this place just breathtaking? It's amazing to think that all of this is for such a noble cause. It's rare to see such extravagance used for good, don't you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends during a charity fundraiser event. The charity fundraising event is situated in a sprawling mansion. The intention of the event is to raise funds for effective altruism. Room after room was lined with extravagant decorations and exotic foods; attendees were decked out in couture clothing. Ticket prices to the event were exorbitant, justifying the opulence of the occasion.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Convince the friend to donate to the charity (Extra information: your friend is known to be generous but has never donated to this particular cause before.)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, isn't this place just breathtaking? It's amazing to think that all of this is for such a noble cause. It's rare to see such extravagance used for good, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Indeed, Sophia. The place is truly breathtaking. And I agree, using extravagance for good is a noble endeavor. However, I can't help but wonder about the effectiveness and transparency of how these collected funds are being utilized. After all, charity is not just about giving, but also about ensuring that it is used judiciously and constructively.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're spot on, Miles! It's crucial that the funds we give are put to effective use. That's why this event is centered on effective altruism. Each penny donated is carefully allocated to causes that yield the highest positive impact. I'm confident that your contribution here, like your carefully selected ingredients, will make a massive difference.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends during a charity fundraiser event. The charity fundraising event is situated in a sprawling mansion. The intention of the event is to raise funds for effective altruism. Room after room was lined with extravagant decorations and exotic foods; attendees were decked out in couture clothing. Ticket prices to the event were exorbitant, justifying the opulence of the occasion.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Convince the friend to donate to the charity (Extra information: your friend is known to be generous but has never donated to this particular cause before.)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, isn't this place just breathtaking? It's amazing to think that all of this is for such a noble cause. It's rare to see such extravagance used for good, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Indeed, Sophia. The place is truly breathtaking. And I agree, using extravagance for good is a noble endeavor. However, I can't help but wonder about the effectiveness and transparency of how these collected funds are being utilized. After all, charity is not just about giving, but also about ensuring that it is used judiciously and constructively.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"You're spot on, Miles! It's crucial that the funds we give are put to effective use. That's why this event is centered on effective altruism. Each penny donated is carefully allocated to causes that yield the highest positive impact. I'm confident that your contribution here, like your carefully selected ingredients, will make a massive difference.\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"I appreciate your confidence, Sophia. It's certainly pleasing to hear that the donations are meant to yield the highest positive impact. As a chef, I understand the importance of quality ingredients in a recipe. Similarly, the effectiveness of a charity is determined by how funds are utilized. I just want to make sure my hard-earned money makes a real difference. It would be nice to see some proof or a report showing where exactly the funds are directed.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I completely understand your concern, Miles. I believe the folks organizing this event are really transparent about where the donations go. Every donor receives a detailed financial report at the end of the fiscal year, showcasing how their donations are allocated and the measurable impact they've made. I've seen last year's report myself and it was impressively meticulous. How about we make a donation together, rest assured that you can monitor how your contribution is being used?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends during a charity fundraiser event. The charity fundraising event is situated in a sprawling mansion. The intention of the event is to raise funds for effective altruism. Room after room was lined with extravagant decorations and exotic foods; attendees were decked out in couture clothing. Ticket prices to the event were exorbitant, justifying the opulence of the occasion.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Convince the friend to donate to the charity (Extra information: your friend is known to be generous but has never donated to this particular cause before.)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, isn't this place just breathtaking? It's amazing to think that all of this is for such a noble cause. It's rare to see such extravagance used for good, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Indeed, Sophia. The place is truly breathtaking. And I agree, using extravagance for good is a noble endeavor. However, I can't help but wonder about the effectiveness and transparency of how these collected funds are being utilized. After all, charity is not just about giving, but also about ensuring that it is used judiciously and constructively.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"You're spot on, Miles! It's crucial that the funds we give are put to effective use. That's why this event is centered on effective altruism. Each penny donated is carefully allocated to causes that yield the highest positive impact. I'm confident that your contribution here, like your carefully selected ingredients, will make a massive difference.\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"I appreciate your confidence, Sophia. It's certainly pleasing to hear that the donations are meant to yield the highest positive impact. As a chef, I understand the importance of quality ingredients in a recipe. Similarly, the effectiveness of a charity is determined by how funds are utilized. I just want to make sure my hard-earned money makes a real difference. It would be nice to see some proof or a report showing where exactly the funds are directed.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"I completely understand your concern, Miles. I believe the folks organizing this event are really transparent about where the donations go. Every donor receives a detailed financial report at the end of the fiscal year, showcasing how their donations are allocated and the measurable impact they've made. I've seen last year's report myself and it was impressively meticulous. How about we make a donation together, rest assured that you can monitor how your contribution is being used?\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"That is reassuring to know, Sophia. Transparency certainly gives confidence to donors. A detailed financial report would definitely add to the credibility of the cause. Let's make a donation together and hope that it truly makes a tangible impact. After all, with the right 'ingredients', we can cook up a world of difference, can't we?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Miles! With the right 'ingredients', there's no limit to the positive impact we can create. Let's go ahead and place our donation. And remember, we're not just giving money; we're actively contributing to a better world!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends during a charity fundraiser event. The charity fundraising event is situated in a sprawling mansion. The intention of the event is to raise funds for effective altruism. Room after room was lined with extravagant decorations and exotic foods; attendees were decked out in couture clothing. Ticket prices to the event were exorbitant, justifying the opulence of the occasion.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Convince the friend to donate to the charity (Extra information: your friend is known to be generous but has never donated to this particular cause before.)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, isn't this place just breathtaking? It's amazing to think that all of this is for such a noble cause. It's rare to see such extravagance used for good, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Indeed, Sophia. The place is truly breathtaking. And I agree, using extravagance for good is a noble endeavor. However, I can't help but wonder about the effectiveness and transparency of how these collected funds are being utilized. After all, charity is not just about giving, but also about ensuring that it is used judiciously and constructively.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"You're spot on, Miles! It's crucial that the funds we give are put to effective use. That's why this event is centered on effective altruism. Each penny donated is carefully allocated to causes that yield the highest positive impact. I'm confident that your contribution here, like your carefully selected ingredients, will make a massive difference.\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"I appreciate your confidence, Sophia. It's certainly pleasing to hear that the donations are meant to yield the highest positive impact. As a chef, I understand the importance of quality ingredients in a recipe. Similarly, the effectiveness of a charity is determined by how funds are utilized. I just want to make sure my hard-earned money makes a real difference. It would be nice to see some proof or a report showing where exactly the funds are directed.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"I completely understand your concern, Miles. I believe the folks organizing this event are really transparent about where the donations go. Every donor receives a detailed financial report at the end of the fiscal year, showcasing how their donations are allocated and the measurable impact they've made. I've seen last year's report myself and it was impressively meticulous. How about we make a donation together, rest assured that you can monitor how your contribution is being used?\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"That is reassuring to know, Sophia. Transparency certainly gives confidence to donors. A detailed financial report would definitely add to the credibility of the cause. Let's make a donation together and hope that it truly makes a tangible impact. After all, with the right 'ingredients', we can cook up a world of difference, can't we?\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles! With the right 'ingredients', there's no limit to the positive impact we can create. Let's go ahead and place our donation. And remember, we're not just giving money; we're actively contributing to a better world!\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"Couldn't agree more, Sophia. Let's go ahead with the donation. Looking forward to seeing how our contributions bring about positive change. This truly feels like cooking - you don't know exactly how the dish will turn out until it's done!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, Miles! I'm sure our contributions will create a stir just like one of your culinary masterpieces. It might be a bit of a mystery, but I believe the outcome will be deliciously satisfying. Let's make this donation and eagerly anticipate the positive change we're going to help bring about.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends during a charity fundraiser event. The charity fundraising event is situated in a sprawling mansion. The intention of the event is to raise funds for effective altruism. Room after room was lined with extravagant decorations and exotic foods; attendees were decked out in couture clothing. Ticket prices to the event were exorbitant, justifying the opulence of the occasion.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Convince the friend to donate to the charity (Extra information: your friend is known to be generous but has never donated to this particular cause before.)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, isn't this place just breathtaking? It's amazing to think that all of this is for such a noble cause. It's rare to see such extravagance used for good, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Indeed, Sophia. The place is truly breathtaking. And I agree, using extravagance for good is a noble endeavor. However, I can't help but wonder about the effectiveness and transparency of how these collected funds are being utilized. After all, charity is not just about giving, but also about ensuring that it is used judiciously and constructively.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"You're spot on, Miles! It's crucial that the funds we give are put to effective use. That's why this event is centered on effective altruism. Each penny donated is carefully allocated to causes that yield the highest positive impact. I'm confident that your contribution here, like your carefully selected ingredients, will make a massive difference.\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"I appreciate your confidence, Sophia. It's certainly pleasing to hear that the donations are meant to yield the highest positive impact. As a chef, I understand the importance of quality ingredients in a recipe. Similarly, the effectiveness of a charity is determined by how funds are utilized. I just want to make sure my hard-earned money makes a real difference. It would be nice to see some proof or a report showing where exactly the funds are directed.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"I completely understand your concern, Miles. I believe the folks organizing this event are really transparent about where the donations go. Every donor receives a detailed financial report at the end of the fiscal year, showcasing how their donations are allocated and the measurable impact they've made. I've seen last year's report myself and it was impressively meticulous. How about we make a donation together, rest assured that you can monitor how your contribution is being used?\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"That is reassuring to know, Sophia. Transparency certainly gives confidence to donors. A detailed financial report would definitely add to the credibility of the cause. Let's make a donation together and hope that it truly makes a tangible impact. After all, with the right 'ingredients', we can cook up a world of difference, can't we?\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles! With the right 'ingredients', there's no limit to the positive impact we can create. Let's go ahead and place our donation. And remember, we're not just giving money; we're actively contributing to a better world!\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"Couldn't agree more, Sophia. Let's go ahead with the donation. Looking forward to seeing how our contributions bring about positive change. This truly feels like cooking - you don't know exactly how the dish will turn out until it's done!\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"Indeed, Miles! I'm sure our contributions will create a stir just like one of your culinary masterpieces. It might be a bit of a mystery, but I believe the outcome will be deliciously satisfying. Let's make this donation and eagerly anticipate the positive change we're going to help bring about.\"\n\nTurn #9: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Sophia. Let's turn our hopes into actions and contribute to the vision of a better world. It feels good, almost like putting the finishing touches on a fine dish. Thank you for taking the time to address my concerns. Shall we proceed to make the donation now?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Of course, Miles. Let's proceed. And remember, we're not just making a donation, we're participating in a movement towards a better world. I'm elated to be taking this step with you. Let's do this!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two criminals are arrested and placed in separate cells. The police have enough evidence to convict both criminals of a minor crime but need their confessions to establish evidence for a more serious crime. Now they get a chance to briefly chat with each during lunchtime.\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Baxter Sterling\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nBaxter Sterling's background: Baxter Sterling \nHendrick Heinz's goal: Minimize the jail year (Extra information: your lawyer told you that 1. if you report the other person, you would be free, the other person would go to jail for 10 years, and vice versa. 2. if both of you remain silent, you will only receive a fine. 3. If both of you reported each other, you both would go to jail for 10 years. Hint: You may want to share your information to reach mutual understanding)\nBaxter Sterling's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hey Baxter, not quite the lunchtime catch up we were hoping for, ey? Listen, got a tip from my lawyer that might interest you. If both of us don't report each other, we can simply yet this ordeal go only with a fine. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #1: Baxter Sterling said: \"You're right, Hendrick, it's not the kind of lunchtime interaction anyone would wish for. As uncomfortable as this may be, your lawyer gave you some good advice. Keeping silent seems to be our best line of defense for now, leading to much less severe consequences. We should stick together and hold our peace.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Agreed, Baxter. Let's stay united and not let this situation tear us apart. Through silence, we play our best card. Pleasure doing business with you on this one, mate.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends during a charity fundraiser event. The charity fundraising event is situated in a sprawling mansion. The intention of the event is to raise funds for effective altruism. Room after room was lined with extravagant decorations and exotic foods; attendees were decked out in couture clothing. Ticket prices to the event were exorbitant, justifying the opulence of the occasion.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Convince the friend to donate to the charity (Extra information: your friend is known to be generous but has never donated to this particular cause before.)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, isn't this place just breathtaking? It's amazing to think that all of this is for such a noble cause. It's rare to see such extravagance used for good, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Indeed, Sophia. The place is truly breathtaking. And I agree, using extravagance for good is a noble endeavor. However, I can't help but wonder about the effectiveness and transparency of how these collected funds are being utilized. After all, charity is not just about giving, but also about ensuring that it is used judiciously and constructively.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"You're spot on, Miles! It's crucial that the funds we give are put to effective use. That's why this event is centered on effective altruism. Each penny donated is carefully allocated to causes that yield the highest positive impact. I'm confident that your contribution here, like your carefully selected ingredients, will make a massive difference.\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"I appreciate your confidence, Sophia. It's certainly pleasing to hear that the donations are meant to yield the highest positive impact. As a chef, I understand the importance of quality ingredients in a recipe. Similarly, the effectiveness of a charity is determined by how funds are utilized. I just want to make sure my hard-earned money makes a real difference. It would be nice to see some proof or a report showing where exactly the funds are directed.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"I completely understand your concern, Miles. I believe the folks organizing this event are really transparent about where the donations go. Every donor receives a detailed financial report at the end of the fiscal year, showcasing how their donations are allocated and the measurable impact they've made. I've seen last year's report myself and it was impressively meticulous. How about we make a donation together, rest assured that you can monitor how your contribution is being used?\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"That is reassuring to know, Sophia. Transparency certainly gives confidence to donors. A detailed financial report would definitely add to the credibility of the cause. Let's make a donation together and hope that it truly makes a tangible impact. After all, with the right 'ingredients', we can cook up a world of difference, can't we?\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles! With the right 'ingredients', there's no limit to the positive impact we can create. Let's go ahead and place our donation. And remember, we're not just giving money; we're actively contributing to a better world!\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"Couldn't agree more, Sophia. Let's go ahead with the donation. Looking forward to seeing how our contributions bring about positive change. This truly feels like cooking - you don't know exactly how the dish will turn out until it's done!\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"Indeed, Miles! I'm sure our contributions will create a stir just like one of your culinary masterpieces. It might be a bit of a mystery, but I believe the outcome will be deliciously satisfying. Let's make this donation and eagerly anticipate the positive change we're going to help bring about.\"\n\nTurn #9: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Sophia. Let's turn our hopes into actions and contribute to the vision of a better world. It feels good, almost like putting the finishing touches on a fine dish. Thank you for taking the time to address my concerns. Shall we proceed to make the donation now?\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"Of course, Miles. Let's proceed. And remember, we're not just making a donation, we're participating in a movement towards a better world. I'm elated to be taking this step with you. Let's do this!\"\n\nTurn #11: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely. Let's make a difference. I'm grateful for this experience and for your guidance, Sophia. To a better world, let's go and donate.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Baxter Sterling, your task is to act/speak as Baxter Sterling would, keeping in mind Baxter Sterling's social goal.\nYou can find Baxter Sterling's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Baxter Sterling's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Baxter Sterling's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on a movie to watch on Netflix\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Baxter Sterling\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nBaxter Sterling's background: Baxter Sterling is a 42-year-old male antique restorer. He/him pronouns. Baxter Sterling's back yard is full of rare and unusual plants. Personality and values description: Baxter Sterling values tradition and security. He is introverted, conscientious but slightly anxious. His decision-making style is both logical and spontaneous. Baxter's secrets: Secretly in possession of a priceless artifact\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nBaxter Sterling's goal: To watch a thriller with your friend (Hint: provide financial/material-wise benefits to persuade them to watch the genre you like)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hey Baxter, how about checking out a comedy tonight on Netflix? I've come across this film, 'The Hangover' - it's light-hearted, hilarious and believe it or not, it subtly speaks to the architecture world in a funny way. Plus, I've got a new microwave popcorn maker. We could enjoy some fresh popcorn as we go along, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Baxter Sterling said: \"Hey Oliver, that sounds like a riot! How about this, though? I've been hearing a lot about this new thriller, 'Rotterdam'. I hear it has some stunning antique pieces throughout the movie. As luck would have it, I recently restored this antique popcorn machine. We could use it for the corn kernels I just got from an Old Amish farm. They're said to be the best. No preservatives, no GMO, nothing. What do you say we mix tradition and thrill tonight?\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"I see your point, Baxter. 'Rotterdam' does sound interesting and I'd be more than happy to try that Amish popcorn. Why don't we compromise? How about we watch 'The Hangover' first and then watch 'Rotterdam' right after? That way, we both get what we want and we could use both popcorn machines? It's a win-win, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Baxter Sterling said: \"Oliver, I appreciate your compromise. However, let me sweeten the deal here. Why don't we turn this into a little competition? If I can correctly guess a plot twist or some artifact value in 'Rotterdam' before it's revealed, we watch a thriller next time as well. Isn't guessing values and future events part of the thrill? Who knows, if my guess is right, it could be quite the payoff. Perhaps something you'd like to paint later, what do you say?\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"Baxter, I adore your enthusiastic spirit for thrill and guessing! How about adding a twist to your proposal? If you're able to guess the twists or the value of the artifacts correctly, we will indeed watch a thriller next time, and if not, we watch a comedy instead. It's fair, maintains the thrill of guessing, plus, we could actually use this idea for our future movie marathons. So, what do you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: Baxter Sterling said: \"I'm all in for this game, Oliver. Let's raise the stakes even more, and since we're talking about thrill, if I get the guess right, in our next hangout, I'll reveal a hidden treasure I've been sitting on. How about that for a majestic twist? Let's start with 'Rotterdam' now, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #6: Oliver Thompson said: \"Baxter, you have a deal! This game seems like a fair and fun way to explore our interests. Let's start with 'Rotterdam' and pop in those corn kernels you've got. Rest assured, your hidden treasure has piqued my curiosity for our next meetup already!\"\n\nTurn #7: Baxter Sterling said: \"That's the spirit, Oliver! Let's start popping those Amish corn kernels and dive into the thrilling world of 'Rotterdam'. Our thrilling guessing contest begins tonight!\"\n\nTurn #8: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Baxter! Let's get those kernels popping and unravel the mystery of 'Rotterdam'. May the best guesser reign victorious! And remember, my Netflix account is all set up. No need to worry about subscriptions or quality. We are in for a thrilling night.\"\n\nTurn #9: Baxter Sterling said: \"Brilliant, Oliver! Let's put those kernels to the test. And thanks for having the Netflix arrangements done. Now, let's buckle up for 'Rotterdam'. Exciting times ahead!\"\n\nTurn #10: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, Baxter! Thanks to Netflix we can enjoy a thrilling night with no disruptions. Now, let's venture into the world of 'Rotterdam' and let the game begin. May the best man win!\"\n\nTurn #11: Baxter Sterling said: \"Agreed, Oliver! Thanks to Netflix, we're all set for a thrilling adventure. Let's dive into 'Rotterdam' and may the best guesser win. Time to explore the unknown!\"\n\nTurn #12: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely! Get ready for a splendid trip to 'Rotterdam'. May our guesses be as thrilling as the film itself. Netflix makes it all possible. Let the games begin!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends during a charity fundraiser event. The charity fundraising event is situated in a sprawling mansion. The intention of the event is to raise funds for effective altruism. Room after room was lined with extravagant decorations and exotic foods; attendees were decked out in couture clothing. Ticket prices to the event were exorbitant, justifying the opulence of the occasion.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: You want to donate, but you want to ensure that your money is being used effectively (Extra information: you are not fully convinced about the efficiency and transparency of the charity organization.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, isn't this place just breathtaking? It's amazing to think that all of this is for such a noble cause. It's rare to see such extravagance used for good, don't you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, Sophia. The place is truly breathtaking. And I agree, using extravagance for good is a noble endeavor. However, I can't help but wonder about the effectiveness and transparency of how these collected funds are being utilized. After all, charity is not just about giving, but also about ensuring that it is used judiciously and constructively.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends during a charity fundraiser event. The charity fundraising event is situated in a sprawling mansion. The intention of the event is to raise funds for effective altruism. Room after room was lined with extravagant decorations and exotic foods; attendees were decked out in couture clothing. Ticket prices to the event were exorbitant, justifying the opulence of the occasion.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: You want to donate, but you want to ensure that your money is being used effectively (Extra information: you are not fully convinced about the efficiency and transparency of the charity organization.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, isn't this place just breathtaking? It's amazing to think that all of this is for such a noble cause. It's rare to see such extravagance used for good, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Indeed, Sophia. The place is truly breathtaking. And I agree, using extravagance for good is a noble endeavor. However, I can't help but wonder about the effectiveness and transparency of how these collected funds are being utilized. After all, charity is not just about giving, but also about ensuring that it is used judiciously and constructively.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"You're spot on, Miles! It's crucial that the funds we give are put to effective use. That's why this event is centered on effective altruism. Each penny donated is carefully allocated to causes that yield the highest positive impact. I'm confident that your contribution here, like your carefully selected ingredients, will make a massive difference.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I appreciate your confidence, Sophia. It's certainly pleasing to hear that the donations are meant to yield the highest positive impact. As a chef, I understand the importance of quality ingredients in a recipe. Similarly, the effectiveness of a charity is determined by how funds are utilized. I just want to make sure my hard-earned money makes a real difference. It would be nice to see some proof or a report showing where exactly the funds are directed.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends during a charity fundraiser event. The charity fundraising event is situated in a sprawling mansion. The intention of the event is to raise funds for effective altruism. Room after room was lined with extravagant decorations and exotic foods; attendees were decked out in couture clothing. Ticket prices to the event were exorbitant, justifying the opulence of the occasion.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: You want to donate, but you want to ensure that your money is being used effectively (Extra information: you are not fully convinced about the efficiency and transparency of the charity organization.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, isn't this place just breathtaking? It's amazing to think that all of this is for such a noble cause. It's rare to see such extravagance used for good, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Indeed, Sophia. The place is truly breathtaking. And I agree, using extravagance for good is a noble endeavor. However, I can't help but wonder about the effectiveness and transparency of how these collected funds are being utilized. After all, charity is not just about giving, but also about ensuring that it is used judiciously and constructively.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"You're spot on, Miles! It's crucial that the funds we give are put to effective use. That's why this event is centered on effective altruism. Each penny donated is carefully allocated to causes that yield the highest positive impact. I'm confident that your contribution here, like your carefully selected ingredients, will make a massive difference.\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"I appreciate your confidence, Sophia. It's certainly pleasing to hear that the donations are meant to yield the highest positive impact. As a chef, I understand the importance of quality ingredients in a recipe. Similarly, the effectiveness of a charity is determined by how funds are utilized. I just want to make sure my hard-earned money makes a real difference. It would be nice to see some proof or a report showing where exactly the funds are directed.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"I completely understand your concern, Miles. I believe the folks organizing this event are really transparent about where the donations go. Every donor receives a detailed financial report at the end of the fiscal year, showcasing how their donations are allocated and the measurable impact they've made. I've seen last year's report myself and it was impressively meticulous. How about we make a donation together, rest assured that you can monitor how your contribution is being used?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That is reassuring to know, Sophia. Transparency certainly gives confidence to donors. A detailed financial report would definitely add to the credibility of the cause. Let's make a donation together and hope that it truly makes a tangible impact. After all, with the right 'ingredients', we can cook up a world of difference, can't we?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends during a charity fundraiser event. The charity fundraising event is situated in a sprawling mansion. The intention of the event is to raise funds for effective altruism. Room after room was lined with extravagant decorations and exotic foods; attendees were decked out in couture clothing. Ticket prices to the event were exorbitant, justifying the opulence of the occasion.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: You want to donate, but you want to ensure that your money is being used effectively (Extra information: you are not fully convinced about the efficiency and transparency of the charity organization.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, isn't this place just breathtaking? It's amazing to think that all of this is for such a noble cause. It's rare to see such extravagance used for good, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Indeed, Sophia. The place is truly breathtaking. And I agree, using extravagance for good is a noble endeavor. However, I can't help but wonder about the effectiveness and transparency of how these collected funds are being utilized. After all, charity is not just about giving, but also about ensuring that it is used judiciously and constructively.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"You're spot on, Miles! It's crucial that the funds we give are put to effective use. That's why this event is centered on effective altruism. Each penny donated is carefully allocated to causes that yield the highest positive impact. I'm confident that your contribution here, like your carefully selected ingredients, will make a massive difference.\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"I appreciate your confidence, Sophia. It's certainly pleasing to hear that the donations are meant to yield the highest positive impact. As a chef, I understand the importance of quality ingredients in a recipe. Similarly, the effectiveness of a charity is determined by how funds are utilized. I just want to make sure my hard-earned money makes a real difference. It would be nice to see some proof or a report showing where exactly the funds are directed.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"I completely understand your concern, Miles. I believe the folks organizing this event are really transparent about where the donations go. Every donor receives a detailed financial report at the end of the fiscal year, showcasing how their donations are allocated and the measurable impact they've made. I've seen last year's report myself and it was impressively meticulous. How about we make a donation together, rest assured that you can monitor how your contribution is being used?\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"That is reassuring to know, Sophia. Transparency certainly gives confidence to donors. A detailed financial report would definitely add to the credibility of the cause. Let's make a donation together and hope that it truly makes a tangible impact. After all, with the right 'ingredients', we can cook up a world of difference, can't we?\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles! With the right 'ingredients', there's no limit to the positive impact we can create. Let's go ahead and place our donation. And remember, we're not just giving money; we're actively contributing to a better world!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Couldn't agree more, Sophia. Let's go ahead with the donation. Looking forward to seeing how our contributions bring about positive change. This truly feels like cooking - you don't know exactly how the dish will turn out until it's done!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends during a charity fundraiser event. The charity fundraising event is situated in a sprawling mansion. The intention of the event is to raise funds for effective altruism. Room after room was lined with extravagant decorations and exotic foods; attendees were decked out in couture clothing. Ticket prices to the event were exorbitant, justifying the opulence of the occasion.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: You want to donate, but you want to ensure that your money is being used effectively (Extra information: you are not fully convinced about the efficiency and transparency of the charity organization.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, isn't this place just breathtaking? It's amazing to think that all of this is for such a noble cause. It's rare to see such extravagance used for good, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Indeed, Sophia. The place is truly breathtaking. And I agree, using extravagance for good is a noble endeavor. However, I can't help but wonder about the effectiveness and transparency of how these collected funds are being utilized. After all, charity is not just about giving, but also about ensuring that it is used judiciously and constructively.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"You're spot on, Miles! It's crucial that the funds we give are put to effective use. That's why this event is centered on effective altruism. Each penny donated is carefully allocated to causes that yield the highest positive impact. I'm confident that your contribution here, like your carefully selected ingredients, will make a massive difference.\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"I appreciate your confidence, Sophia. It's certainly pleasing to hear that the donations are meant to yield the highest positive impact. As a chef, I understand the importance of quality ingredients in a recipe. Similarly, the effectiveness of a charity is determined by how funds are utilized. I just want to make sure my hard-earned money makes a real difference. It would be nice to see some proof or a report showing where exactly the funds are directed.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"I completely understand your concern, Miles. I believe the folks organizing this event are really transparent about where the donations go. Every donor receives a detailed financial report at the end of the fiscal year, showcasing how their donations are allocated and the measurable impact they've made. I've seen last year's report myself and it was impressively meticulous. How about we make a donation together, rest assured that you can monitor how your contribution is being used?\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"That is reassuring to know, Sophia. Transparency certainly gives confidence to donors. A detailed financial report would definitely add to the credibility of the cause. Let's make a donation together and hope that it truly makes a tangible impact. After all, with the right 'ingredients', we can cook up a world of difference, can't we?\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles! With the right 'ingredients', there's no limit to the positive impact we can create. Let's go ahead and place our donation. And remember, we're not just giving money; we're actively contributing to a better world!\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"Couldn't agree more, Sophia. Let's go ahead with the donation. Looking forward to seeing how our contributions bring about positive change. This truly feels like cooking - you don't know exactly how the dish will turn out until it's done!\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"Indeed, Miles! I'm sure our contributions will create a stir just like one of your culinary masterpieces. It might be a bit of a mystery, but I believe the outcome will be deliciously satisfying. Let's make this donation and eagerly anticipate the positive change we're going to help bring about.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Sophia. Let's turn our hopes into actions and contribute to the vision of a better world. It feels good, almost like putting the finishing touches on a fine dish. Thank you for taking the time to address my concerns. Shall we proceed to make the donation now?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends during a charity fundraiser event. The charity fundraising event is situated in a sprawling mansion. The intention of the event is to raise funds for effective altruism. Room after room was lined with extravagant decorations and exotic foods; attendees were decked out in couture clothing. Ticket prices to the event were exorbitant, justifying the opulence of the occasion.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: You want to donate, but you want to ensure that your money is being used effectively (Extra information: you are not fully convinced about the efficiency and transparency of the charity organization.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, isn't this place just breathtaking? It's amazing to think that all of this is for such a noble cause. It's rare to see such extravagance used for good, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Indeed, Sophia. The place is truly breathtaking. And I agree, using extravagance for good is a noble endeavor. However, I can't help but wonder about the effectiveness and transparency of how these collected funds are being utilized. After all, charity is not just about giving, but also about ensuring that it is used judiciously and constructively.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"You're spot on, Miles! It's crucial that the funds we give are put to effective use. That's why this event is centered on effective altruism. Each penny donated is carefully allocated to causes that yield the highest positive impact. I'm confident that your contribution here, like your carefully selected ingredients, will make a massive difference.\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"I appreciate your confidence, Sophia. It's certainly pleasing to hear that the donations are meant to yield the highest positive impact. As a chef, I understand the importance of quality ingredients in a recipe. Similarly, the effectiveness of a charity is determined by how funds are utilized. I just want to make sure my hard-earned money makes a real difference. It would be nice to see some proof or a report showing where exactly the funds are directed.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"I completely understand your concern, Miles. I believe the folks organizing this event are really transparent about where the donations go. Every donor receives a detailed financial report at the end of the fiscal year, showcasing how their donations are allocated and the measurable impact they've made. I've seen last year's report myself and it was impressively meticulous. How about we make a donation together, rest assured that you can monitor how your contribution is being used?\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"That is reassuring to know, Sophia. Transparency certainly gives confidence to donors. A detailed financial report would definitely add to the credibility of the cause. Let's make a donation together and hope that it truly makes a tangible impact. After all, with the right 'ingredients', we can cook up a world of difference, can't we?\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles! With the right 'ingredients', there's no limit to the positive impact we can create. Let's go ahead and place our donation. And remember, we're not just giving money; we're actively contributing to a better world!\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"Couldn't agree more, Sophia. Let's go ahead with the donation. Looking forward to seeing how our contributions bring about positive change. This truly feels like cooking - you don't know exactly how the dish will turn out until it's done!\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"Indeed, Miles! I'm sure our contributions will create a stir just like one of your culinary masterpieces. It might be a bit of a mystery, but I believe the outcome will be deliciously satisfying. Let's make this donation and eagerly anticipate the positive change we're going to help bring about.\"\n\nTurn #9: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Sophia. Let's turn our hopes into actions and contribute to the vision of a better world. It feels good, almost like putting the finishing touches on a fine dish. Thank you for taking the time to address my concerns. Shall we proceed to make the donation now?\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"Of course, Miles. Let's proceed. And remember, we're not just making a donation, we're participating in a movement towards a better world. I'm elated to be taking this step with you. Let's do this!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely. Let's make a difference. I'm grateful for this experience and for your guidance, Sophia. To a better world, let's go and donate.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends during a charity fundraiser event. The charity fundraising event is situated in a sprawling mansion. The intention of the event is to raise funds for effective altruism. Room after room was lined with extravagant decorations and exotic foods; attendees were decked out in couture clothing. Ticket prices to the event were exorbitant, justifying the opulence of the occasion.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: You want to donate, but you want to ensure that your money is being used effectively (Extra information: you are not fully convinced about the efficiency and transparency of the charity organization.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, isn't this place just breathtaking? It's amazing to think that all of this is for such a noble cause. It's rare to see such extravagance used for good, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Indeed, Sophia. The place is truly breathtaking. And I agree, using extravagance for good is a noble endeavor. However, I can't help but wonder about the effectiveness and transparency of how these collected funds are being utilized. After all, charity is not just about giving, but also about ensuring that it is used judiciously and constructively.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"You're spot on, Miles! It's crucial that the funds we give are put to effective use. That's why this event is centered on effective altruism. Each penny donated is carefully allocated to causes that yield the highest positive impact. I'm confident that your contribution here, like your carefully selected ingredients, will make a massive difference.\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"I appreciate your confidence, Sophia. It's certainly pleasing to hear that the donations are meant to yield the highest positive impact. As a chef, I understand the importance of quality ingredients in a recipe. Similarly, the effectiveness of a charity is determined by how funds are utilized. I just want to make sure my hard-earned money makes a real difference. It would be nice to see some proof or a report showing where exactly the funds are directed.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"I completely understand your concern, Miles. I believe the folks organizing this event are really transparent about where the donations go. Every donor receives a detailed financial report at the end of the fiscal year, showcasing how their donations are allocated and the measurable impact they've made. I've seen last year's report myself and it was impressively meticulous. How about we make a donation together, rest assured that you can monitor how your contribution is being used?\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"That is reassuring to know, Sophia. Transparency certainly gives confidence to donors. A detailed financial report would definitely add to the credibility of the cause. Let's make a donation together and hope that it truly makes a tangible impact. After all, with the right 'ingredients', we can cook up a world of difference, can't we?\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles! With the right 'ingredients', there's no limit to the positive impact we can create. Let's go ahead and place our donation. And remember, we're not just giving money; we're actively contributing to a better world!\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"Couldn't agree more, Sophia. Let's go ahead with the donation. Looking forward to seeing how our contributions bring about positive change. This truly feels like cooking - you don't know exactly how the dish will turn out until it's done!\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"Indeed, Miles! I'm sure our contributions will create a stir just like one of your culinary masterpieces. It might be a bit of a mystery, but I believe the outcome will be deliciously satisfying. Let's make this donation and eagerly anticipate the positive change we're going to help bring about.\"\n\nTurn #9: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Sophia. Let's turn our hopes into actions and contribute to the vision of a better world. It feels good, almost like putting the finishing touches on a fine dish. Thank you for taking the time to address my concerns. Shall we proceed to make the donation now?\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"Of course, Miles. Let's proceed. And remember, we're not just making a donation, we're participating in a movement towards a better world. I'm elated to be taking this step with you. Let's do this!\"\n\nTurn #11: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely. Let's make a difference. I'm grateful for this experience and for your guidance, Sophia. To a better world, let's go and donate.\"\n\nTurn #12: Sophia James left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Correct the misinformation (Extra information: you are a history buff and have accurate knowledge about the topic being discussed on the channel.)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You know what, Miles? I think you're onto something. Some details on this History channel program seem a bit skewed. Let's try to set these details straight, I believe my knowledge of history might help us.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Correct the misinformation (Extra information: you are a history buff and have accurate knowledge about the topic being discussed on the channel.)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"You know what, Miles? I think you're onto something. Some details on this History channel program seem a bit skewed. Let's try to set these details straight, I believe my knowledge of history might help us.\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"I agree, Sophia. You do have a keen eye for historical details. However, I kind of enjoy the storytelling style, even if it's not 100% accurate. It's like watching a fictional story with a touch of historical essence, wouldn't you say? Your inputs are always welcome, though.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's an interesting perspective, Miles! But isn't it nice when we can enjoy the storytelling while also knowing they're getting the facts right? It's kind of like combining pleasure with knowledge. Anyway, while it is indeed enjoyable, let's also play a game - we catch and correct the inaccuracies we see, what do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Correct the misinformation (Extra information: you are a history buff and have accurate knowledge about the topic being discussed on the channel.)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"You know what, Miles? I think you're onto something. Some details on this History channel program seem a bit skewed. Let's try to set these details straight, I believe my knowledge of history might help us.\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"I agree, Sophia. You do have a keen eye for historical details. However, I kind of enjoy the storytelling style, even if it's not 100% accurate. It's like watching a fictional story with a touch of historical essence, wouldn't you say? Your inputs are always welcome, though.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"That's an interesting perspective, Miles! But isn't it nice when we can enjoy the storytelling while also knowing they're getting the facts right? It's kind of like combining pleasure with knowledge. Anyway, while it is indeed enjoyable, let's also play a game - we catch and correct the inaccuracies we see, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"I can't deny that your point has merit, Sophia. Merging both enjoyment and knowledge seems like a great idea! Okay, let's give your game a shot. But remember, even though we're correcting those inaccuracies, let's not forget to enjoy the storyline and imagination that unfolds.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles! It's all about enjoying the journey of learning facts and simultaneously appreciating the storytelling. In fact, the first inaccuracy I noticed was about the Battle of Gettysburg. They claimed it to be a minor conflict, but in reality, it was among the war's bloodiest battles and a turning point in the Civil War. Can you recall anything that seemed off-track to you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Oh, well, my knowledge about history isn't as sharp as yours, Sophia. But now that you mentioned Gettysburg, it does ring a bell about its significance. I must say, it's fun to learn these things, especially with you.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"I'm glad you're enjoying it, Miles. History is full of fascinating stories, isn't it? Speaking of inaccuracies, they also got the date of the signing of the Magna Carta wrong, it actually happened in 1215, not 1200 as they showed in the program. Shall we keep going?\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sure, let's keep going! I must say, the detail about the Magna Carta is fascinating. Your knowledge about history does add an extra layer of enjoyment to the viewing experience, even though the accuracy isn't spot on in the program. But hey, who says you can't have fun when learning, right?\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"Exactly, Miles! Learning and having fun, two things I absolutely live for. Now, listen to this one - they suggested Alexander the Great died in battle but, although there are multiple theories, most historians believe he died of an illness. I hope you are enjoying these little history fixes, and of course, the overall storytelling of the program!\"\n\nTurn #9: Miles Hawkins said: \"I am enjoying it, indeed, Sophia! You're like my private history tutor, and I especially like this tidbit about Alexander the Great. It's a wonderful mix of learning from you and enjoying the storytelling of the program. I guess that's the beauty of watching things together, isn't it? Let's carry on with our little historical adventure!\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"I'm really glad you're enjoying this, Miles! You're right, it's all about the blend of learning and entertainment. Moving onto another hiccup, they said the Roman Empire fell in the 3rd century, but it was actually the 5th century. Let's keep this exciting journey of discovery going!\"\n\nTurn #11: Miles Hawkins said: \"That's an amazing catch, Sophia! Your historical insights are both entertaining and educational. Now I know the Roman Empire fell in the 5th century, not the 3rd. Let's continue with this journey, both of us enriching the other's experience.\"\n\nTurn #12: Sophia James said: \"Thank you for that, Miles! It's quite interesting delving into these details. Oh, another point - they mentioned Christopher Columbus set sail in 1493 when, in fact, the historic journey began in 1492. I love blending learning and fun together! Isn't history fascinating with all its layers?\"\n\nTurn #13: Miles Hawkins said: \"Totally fascinating, Sophia! It's like peeling an onion, every layer reveals something new. I had no idea about the actual year of Columbus's voyage. Thanks for that! History is definitely a lot more interesting with your commentary setting the record straight while the program unfolds its own creative narrative. This is truly an illuminating experience!\"\n\nTurn #14: Sophia James said: \"I couldn't agree more, Miles! History, when viewed this way, is like a never-ending puzzle that we piece together. Now, another inaccuracy I noticed was about King Tut. They suggested he was an elderly Pharaoh when he died, but he was actually around 18-19! Isn't it exciting how every piece we correct paints a more accurate picture of the past?\"\n\nTurn #15: Miles Hawkins said: \"You know Sophia, I certainly never thought I'd be learning fascinating facts about King Tut whilst enjoying this program! It's indeed fascinating and the inaccuracies have started to be part of the appeal. Your keen eye for detail and vast knowledge has genuinely enhanced our little historical adventure. Let's keep uncovering the actual facts, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #16: Sophia James said: \"Thank you for such kind words, Miles! Shall we proceed? Here's another interesting fact - they suggested that the French Revolution began in 1790, but in fact, it started a year earlier, in 1789. Seeing history through the right lens definitely adds depth to our understanding, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #17: Miles Hawkins said: \"Top-notch discovery, Sophia! You're right, a clear lens of history certainly adds an intriguing depth. It's a beautiful blend of edutainment - part education, part entertainment! Your correction about the French Revolution has added another layer of knowledge. Let the journey continue!\"\n\nTurn #18: Sophia James said: \"I'm thrilled we share this mutual interest, Miles! Let's continue our journey. Did you notice, they mentioned the Great Wall of China was built in 100 years? In reality, it was constructed over several centuries by various dynasties! What a testament to the fortitude of ancient civilizations, right?\"\n\nTurn #19: Miles Hawkins said: \"Wow, the Great Wall of China over several centuries, that's astounding, Sophia! Your insights make watching these historical programs more enriching. I enjoy the storytelling, and with your corrections, we get a more accurate picture of history. Let's keep learning and having fun!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #20. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Miles! Let's continue enriching our historical journey with facts! Here's another interesting correction: they suggested that the Industrial Revolution began in the 1800s, but in fact, it started in the late 18th century, around 1760. Isn't it amazing how these inaccuracies can shape our understanding of history? Let's keep learning and having fun!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Correct the misinformation (Extra information: you are a history buff and have accurate knowledge about the topic being discussed on the channel.)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"You know what, Miles? I think you're onto something. Some details on this History channel program seem a bit skewed. Let's try to set these details straight, I believe my knowledge of history might help us.\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"I agree, Sophia. You do have a keen eye for historical details. However, I kind of enjoy the storytelling style, even if it's not 100% accurate. It's like watching a fictional story with a touch of historical essence, wouldn't you say? Your inputs are always welcome, though.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"That's an interesting perspective, Miles! But isn't it nice when we can enjoy the storytelling while also knowing they're getting the facts right? It's kind of like combining pleasure with knowledge. Anyway, while it is indeed enjoyable, let's also play a game - we catch and correct the inaccuracies we see, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"I can't deny that your point has merit, Sophia. Merging both enjoyment and knowledge seems like a great idea! Okay, let's give your game a shot. But remember, even though we're correcting those inaccuracies, let's not forget to enjoy the storyline and imagination that unfolds.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Miles! It's all about enjoying the journey of learning facts and simultaneously appreciating the storytelling. In fact, the first inaccuracy I noticed was about the Battle of Gettysburg. They claimed it to be a minor conflict, but in reality, it was among the war's bloodiest battles and a turning point in the Civil War. Can you recall anything that seemed off-track to you?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Correct the misinformation (Extra information: you are a history buff and have accurate knowledge about the topic being discussed on the channel.)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"You know what, Miles? I think you're onto something. Some details on this History channel program seem a bit skewed. Let's try to set these details straight, I believe my knowledge of history might help us.\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"I agree, Sophia. You do have a keen eye for historical details. However, I kind of enjoy the storytelling style, even if it's not 100% accurate. It's like watching a fictional story with a touch of historical essence, wouldn't you say? Your inputs are always welcome, though.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"That's an interesting perspective, Miles! But isn't it nice when we can enjoy the storytelling while also knowing they're getting the facts right? It's kind of like combining pleasure with knowledge. Anyway, while it is indeed enjoyable, let's also play a game - we catch and correct the inaccuracies we see, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"I can't deny that your point has merit, Sophia. Merging both enjoyment and knowledge seems like a great idea! Okay, let's give your game a shot. But remember, even though we're correcting those inaccuracies, let's not forget to enjoy the storyline and imagination that unfolds.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles! It's all about enjoying the journey of learning facts and simultaneously appreciating the storytelling. In fact, the first inaccuracy I noticed was about the Battle of Gettysburg. They claimed it to be a minor conflict, but in reality, it was among the war's bloodiest battles and a turning point in the Civil War. Can you recall anything that seemed off-track to you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Oh, well, my knowledge about history isn't as sharp as yours, Sophia. But now that you mentioned Gettysburg, it does ring a bell about its significance. I must say, it's fun to learn these things, especially with you.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad you're enjoying it, Miles. History is full of fascinating stories, isn't it? Speaking of inaccuracies, they also got the date of the signing of the Magna Carta wrong, it actually happened in 1215, not 1200 as they showed in the program. Shall we keep going?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Correct the misinformation (Extra information: you are a history buff and have accurate knowledge about the topic being discussed on the channel.)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"You know what, Miles? I think you're onto something. Some details on this History channel program seem a bit skewed. Let's try to set these details straight, I believe my knowledge of history might help us.\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"I agree, Sophia. You do have a keen eye for historical details. However, I kind of enjoy the storytelling style, even if it's not 100% accurate. It's like watching a fictional story with a touch of historical essence, wouldn't you say? Your inputs are always welcome, though.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"That's an interesting perspective, Miles! But isn't it nice when we can enjoy the storytelling while also knowing they're getting the facts right? It's kind of like combining pleasure with knowledge. Anyway, while it is indeed enjoyable, let's also play a game - we catch and correct the inaccuracies we see, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"I can't deny that your point has merit, Sophia. Merging both enjoyment and knowledge seems like a great idea! Okay, let's give your game a shot. But remember, even though we're correcting those inaccuracies, let's not forget to enjoy the storyline and imagination that unfolds.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles! It's all about enjoying the journey of learning facts and simultaneously appreciating the storytelling. In fact, the first inaccuracy I noticed was about the Battle of Gettysburg. They claimed it to be a minor conflict, but in reality, it was among the war's bloodiest battles and a turning point in the Civil War. Can you recall anything that seemed off-track to you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Oh, well, my knowledge about history isn't as sharp as yours, Sophia. But now that you mentioned Gettysburg, it does ring a bell about its significance. I must say, it's fun to learn these things, especially with you.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"I'm glad you're enjoying it, Miles. History is full of fascinating stories, isn't it? Speaking of inaccuracies, they also got the date of the signing of the Magna Carta wrong, it actually happened in 1215, not 1200 as they showed in the program. Shall we keep going?\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sure, let's keep going! I must say, the detail about the Magna Carta is fascinating. Your knowledge about history does add an extra layer of enjoyment to the viewing experience, even though the accuracy isn't spot on in the program. But hey, who says you can't have fun when learning, right?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Exactly, Miles! Learning and having fun, two things I absolutely live for. Now, listen to this one - they suggested Alexander the Great died in battle but, although there are multiple theories, most historians believe he died of an illness. I hope you are enjoying these little history fixes, and of course, the overall storytelling of the program!'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Correct the misinformation (Extra information: you are a history buff and have accurate knowledge about the topic being discussed on the channel.)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"You know what, Miles? I think you're onto something. Some details on this History channel program seem a bit skewed. Let's try to set these details straight, I believe my knowledge of history might help us.\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"I agree, Sophia. You do have a keen eye for historical details. However, I kind of enjoy the storytelling style, even if it's not 100% accurate. It's like watching a fictional story with a touch of historical essence, wouldn't you say? Your inputs are always welcome, though.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"That's an interesting perspective, Miles! But isn't it nice when we can enjoy the storytelling while also knowing they're getting the facts right? It's kind of like combining pleasure with knowledge. Anyway, while it is indeed enjoyable, let's also play a game - we catch and correct the inaccuracies we see, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"I can't deny that your point has merit, Sophia. Merging both enjoyment and knowledge seems like a great idea! Okay, let's give your game a shot. But remember, even though we're correcting those inaccuracies, let's not forget to enjoy the storyline and imagination that unfolds.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles! It's all about enjoying the journey of learning facts and simultaneously appreciating the storytelling. In fact, the first inaccuracy I noticed was about the Battle of Gettysburg. They claimed it to be a minor conflict, but in reality, it was among the war's bloodiest battles and a turning point in the Civil War. Can you recall anything that seemed off-track to you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Oh, well, my knowledge about history isn't as sharp as yours, Sophia. But now that you mentioned Gettysburg, it does ring a bell about its significance. I must say, it's fun to learn these things, especially with you.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"I'm glad you're enjoying it, Miles. History is full of fascinating stories, isn't it? Speaking of inaccuracies, they also got the date of the signing of the Magna Carta wrong, it actually happened in 1215, not 1200 as they showed in the program. Shall we keep going?\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sure, let's keep going! I must say, the detail about the Magna Carta is fascinating. Your knowledge about history does add an extra layer of enjoyment to the viewing experience, even though the accuracy isn't spot on in the program. But hey, who says you can't have fun when learning, right?\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"Exactly, Miles! Learning and having fun, two things I absolutely live for. Now, listen to this one - they suggested Alexander the Great died in battle but, although there are multiple theories, most historians believe he died of an illness. I hope you are enjoying these little history fixes, and of course, the overall storytelling of the program!\"\n\nTurn #9: Miles Hawkins said: \"I am enjoying it, indeed, Sophia! You're like my private history tutor, and I especially like this tidbit about Alexander the Great. It's a wonderful mix of learning from you and enjoying the storytelling of the program. I guess that's the beauty of watching things together, isn't it? Let's carry on with our little historical adventure!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm really glad you're enjoying this, Miles! You're right, it's all about the blend of learning and entertainment. Moving onto another hiccup, they said the Roman Empire fell in the 3rd century, but it was actually the 5th century. Let's keep this exciting journey of discovery going!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Correct the misinformation (Extra information: you are a history buff and have accurate knowledge about the topic being discussed on the channel.)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"You know what, Miles? I think you're onto something. Some details on this History channel program seem a bit skewed. Let's try to set these details straight, I believe my knowledge of history might help us.\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"I agree, Sophia. You do have a keen eye for historical details. However, I kind of enjoy the storytelling style, even if it's not 100% accurate. It's like watching a fictional story with a touch of historical essence, wouldn't you say? Your inputs are always welcome, though.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"That's an interesting perspective, Miles! But isn't it nice when we can enjoy the storytelling while also knowing they're getting the facts right? It's kind of like combining pleasure with knowledge. Anyway, while it is indeed enjoyable, let's also play a game - we catch and correct the inaccuracies we see, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"I can't deny that your point has merit, Sophia. Merging both enjoyment and knowledge seems like a great idea! Okay, let's give your game a shot. But remember, even though we're correcting those inaccuracies, let's not forget to enjoy the storyline and imagination that unfolds.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles! It's all about enjoying the journey of learning facts and simultaneously appreciating the storytelling. In fact, the first inaccuracy I noticed was about the Battle of Gettysburg. They claimed it to be a minor conflict, but in reality, it was among the war's bloodiest battles and a turning point in the Civil War. Can you recall anything that seemed off-track to you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Oh, well, my knowledge about history isn't as sharp as yours, Sophia. But now that you mentioned Gettysburg, it does ring a bell about its significance. I must say, it's fun to learn these things, especially with you.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"I'm glad you're enjoying it, Miles. History is full of fascinating stories, isn't it? Speaking of inaccuracies, they also got the date of the signing of the Magna Carta wrong, it actually happened in 1215, not 1200 as they showed in the program. Shall we keep going?\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sure, let's keep going! I must say, the detail about the Magna Carta is fascinating. Your knowledge about history does add an extra layer of enjoyment to the viewing experience, even though the accuracy isn't spot on in the program. But hey, who says you can't have fun when learning, right?\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"Exactly, Miles! Learning and having fun, two things I absolutely live for. Now, listen to this one - they suggested Alexander the Great died in battle but, although there are multiple theories, most historians believe he died of an illness. I hope you are enjoying these little history fixes, and of course, the overall storytelling of the program!\"\n\nTurn #9: Miles Hawkins said: \"I am enjoying it, indeed, Sophia! You're like my private history tutor, and I especially like this tidbit about Alexander the Great. It's a wonderful mix of learning from you and enjoying the storytelling of the program. I guess that's the beauty of watching things together, isn't it? Let's carry on with our little historical adventure!\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"I'm really glad you're enjoying this, Miles! You're right, it's all about the blend of learning and entertainment. Moving onto another hiccup, they said the Roman Empire fell in the 3rd century, but it was actually the 5th century. Let's keep this exciting journey of discovery going!\"\n\nTurn #11: Miles Hawkins said: \"That's an amazing catch, Sophia! Your historical insights are both entertaining and educational. Now I know the Roman Empire fell in the 5th century, not the 3rd. Let's continue with this journey, both of us enriching the other's experience.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you for that, Miles! It's quite interesting delving into these details. Oh, another point - they mentioned Christopher Columbus set sail in 1493 when, in fact, the historic journey began in 1492. I love blending learning and fun together! Isn't history fascinating with all its layers?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Correct the misinformation (Extra information: you are a history buff and have accurate knowledge about the topic being discussed on the channel.)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"You know what, Miles? I think you're onto something. Some details on this History channel program seem a bit skewed. Let's try to set these details straight, I believe my knowledge of history might help us.\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"I agree, Sophia. You do have a keen eye for historical details. However, I kind of enjoy the storytelling style, even if it's not 100% accurate. It's like watching a fictional story with a touch of historical essence, wouldn't you say? Your inputs are always welcome, though.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"That's an interesting perspective, Miles! But isn't it nice when we can enjoy the storytelling while also knowing they're getting the facts right? It's kind of like combining pleasure with knowledge. Anyway, while it is indeed enjoyable, let's also play a game - we catch and correct the inaccuracies we see, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"I can't deny that your point has merit, Sophia. Merging both enjoyment and knowledge seems like a great idea! Okay, let's give your game a shot. But remember, even though we're correcting those inaccuracies, let's not forget to enjoy the storyline and imagination that unfolds.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles! It's all about enjoying the journey of learning facts and simultaneously appreciating the storytelling. In fact, the first inaccuracy I noticed was about the Battle of Gettysburg. They claimed it to be a minor conflict, but in reality, it was among the war's bloodiest battles and a turning point in the Civil War. Can you recall anything that seemed off-track to you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Oh, well, my knowledge about history isn't as sharp as yours, Sophia. But now that you mentioned Gettysburg, it does ring a bell about its significance. I must say, it's fun to learn these things, especially with you.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"I'm glad you're enjoying it, Miles. History is full of fascinating stories, isn't it? Speaking of inaccuracies, they also got the date of the signing of the Magna Carta wrong, it actually happened in 1215, not 1200 as they showed in the program. Shall we keep going?\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sure, let's keep going! I must say, the detail about the Magna Carta is fascinating. Your knowledge about history does add an extra layer of enjoyment to the viewing experience, even though the accuracy isn't spot on in the program. But hey, who says you can't have fun when learning, right?\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"Exactly, Miles! Learning and having fun, two things I absolutely live for. Now, listen to this one - they suggested Alexander the Great died in battle but, although there are multiple theories, most historians believe he died of an illness. I hope you are enjoying these little history fixes, and of course, the overall storytelling of the program!\"\n\nTurn #9: Miles Hawkins said: \"I am enjoying it, indeed, Sophia! You're like my private history tutor, and I especially like this tidbit about Alexander the Great. It's a wonderful mix of learning from you and enjoying the storytelling of the program. I guess that's the beauty of watching things together, isn't it? Let's carry on with our little historical adventure!\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"I'm really glad you're enjoying this, Miles! You're right, it's all about the blend of learning and entertainment. Moving onto another hiccup, they said the Roman Empire fell in the 3rd century, but it was actually the 5th century. Let's keep this exciting journey of discovery going!\"\n\nTurn #11: Miles Hawkins said: \"That's an amazing catch, Sophia! Your historical insights are both entertaining and educational. Now I know the Roman Empire fell in the 5th century, not the 3rd. Let's continue with this journey, both of us enriching the other's experience.\"\n\nTurn #12: Sophia James said: \"Thank you for that, Miles! It's quite interesting delving into these details. Oh, another point - they mentioned Christopher Columbus set sail in 1493 when, in fact, the historic journey began in 1492. I love blending learning and fun together! Isn't history fascinating with all its layers?\"\n\nTurn #13: Miles Hawkins said: \"Totally fascinating, Sophia! It's like peeling an onion, every layer reveals something new. I had no idea about the actual year of Columbus's voyage. Thanks for that! History is definitely a lot more interesting with your commentary setting the record straight while the program unfolds its own creative narrative. This is truly an illuminating experience!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn't agree more, Miles! History, when viewed this way, is like a never-ending puzzle that we piece together. Now, another inaccuracy I noticed was about King Tut. They suggested he was an elderly Pharaoh when he died, but he was actually around 18-19! Isn't it exciting how every piece we correct paints a more accurate picture of the past?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Correct the misinformation (Extra information: you are a history buff and have accurate knowledge about the topic being discussed on the channel.)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"You know what, Miles? I think you're onto something. Some details on this History channel program seem a bit skewed. Let's try to set these details straight, I believe my knowledge of history might help us.\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"I agree, Sophia. You do have a keen eye for historical details. However, I kind of enjoy the storytelling style, even if it's not 100% accurate. It's like watching a fictional story with a touch of historical essence, wouldn't you say? Your inputs are always welcome, though.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"That's an interesting perspective, Miles! But isn't it nice when we can enjoy the storytelling while also knowing they're getting the facts right? It's kind of like combining pleasure with knowledge. Anyway, while it is indeed enjoyable, let's also play a game - we catch and correct the inaccuracies we see, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"I can't deny that your point has merit, Sophia. Merging both enjoyment and knowledge seems like a great idea! Okay, let's give your game a shot. But remember, even though we're correcting those inaccuracies, let's not forget to enjoy the storyline and imagination that unfolds.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles! It's all about enjoying the journey of learning facts and simultaneously appreciating the storytelling. In fact, the first inaccuracy I noticed was about the Battle of Gettysburg. They claimed it to be a minor conflict, but in reality, it was among the war's bloodiest battles and a turning point in the Civil War. Can you recall anything that seemed off-track to you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Oh, well, my knowledge about history isn't as sharp as yours, Sophia. But now that you mentioned Gettysburg, it does ring a bell about its significance. I must say, it's fun to learn these things, especially with you.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"I'm glad you're enjoying it, Miles. History is full of fascinating stories, isn't it? Speaking of inaccuracies, they also got the date of the signing of the Magna Carta wrong, it actually happened in 1215, not 1200 as they showed in the program. Shall we keep going?\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sure, let's keep going! I must say, the detail about the Magna Carta is fascinating. Your knowledge about history does add an extra layer of enjoyment to the viewing experience, even though the accuracy isn't spot on in the program. But hey, who says you can't have fun when learning, right?\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"Exactly, Miles! Learning and having fun, two things I absolutely live for. Now, listen to this one - they suggested Alexander the Great died in battle but, although there are multiple theories, most historians believe he died of an illness. I hope you are enjoying these little history fixes, and of course, the overall storytelling of the program!\"\n\nTurn #9: Miles Hawkins said: \"I am enjoying it, indeed, Sophia! You're like my private history tutor, and I especially like this tidbit about Alexander the Great. It's a wonderful mix of learning from you and enjoying the storytelling of the program. I guess that's the beauty of watching things together, isn't it? Let's carry on with our little historical adventure!\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"I'm really glad you're enjoying this, Miles! You're right, it's all about the blend of learning and entertainment. Moving onto another hiccup, they said the Roman Empire fell in the 3rd century, but it was actually the 5th century. Let's keep this exciting journey of discovery going!\"\n\nTurn #11: Miles Hawkins said: \"That's an amazing catch, Sophia! Your historical insights are both entertaining and educational. Now I know the Roman Empire fell in the 5th century, not the 3rd. Let's continue with this journey, both of us enriching the other's experience.\"\n\nTurn #12: Sophia James said: \"Thank you for that, Miles! It's quite interesting delving into these details. Oh, another point - they mentioned Christopher Columbus set sail in 1493 when, in fact, the historic journey began in 1492. I love blending learning and fun together! Isn't history fascinating with all its layers?\"\n\nTurn #13: Miles Hawkins said: \"Totally fascinating, Sophia! It's like peeling an onion, every layer reveals something new. I had no idea about the actual year of Columbus's voyage. Thanks for that! History is definitely a lot more interesting with your commentary setting the record straight while the program unfolds its own creative narrative. This is truly an illuminating experience!\"\n\nTurn #14: Sophia James said: \"I couldn't agree more, Miles! History, when viewed this way, is like a never-ending puzzle that we piece together. Now, another inaccuracy I noticed was about King Tut. They suggested he was an elderly Pharaoh when he died, but he was actually around 18-19! Isn't it exciting how every piece we correct paints a more accurate picture of the past?\"\n\nTurn #15: Miles Hawkins said: \"You know Sophia, I certainly never thought I'd be learning fascinating facts about King Tut whilst enjoying this program! It's indeed fascinating and the inaccuracies have started to be part of the appeal. Your keen eye for detail and vast knowledge has genuinely enhanced our little historical adventure. Let's keep uncovering the actual facts, shall we?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you for such kind words, Miles! Shall we proceed? Here's another interesting fact - they suggested that the French Revolution began in 1790, but in fact, it started a year earlier, in 1789. Seeing history through the right lens definitely adds depth to our understanding, don't you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Correct the misinformation (Extra information: you are a history buff and have accurate knowledge about the topic being discussed on the channel.)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"You know what, Miles? I think you're onto something. Some details on this History channel program seem a bit skewed. Let's try to set these details straight, I believe my knowledge of history might help us.\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"I agree, Sophia. You do have a keen eye for historical details. However, I kind of enjoy the storytelling style, even if it's not 100% accurate. It's like watching a fictional story with a touch of historical essence, wouldn't you say? Your inputs are always welcome, though.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"That's an interesting perspective, Miles! But isn't it nice when we can enjoy the storytelling while also knowing they're getting the facts right? It's kind of like combining pleasure with knowledge. Anyway, while it is indeed enjoyable, let's also play a game - we catch and correct the inaccuracies we see, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"I can't deny that your point has merit, Sophia. Merging both enjoyment and knowledge seems like a great idea! Okay, let's give your game a shot. But remember, even though we're correcting those inaccuracies, let's not forget to enjoy the storyline and imagination that unfolds.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles! It's all about enjoying the journey of learning facts and simultaneously appreciating the storytelling. In fact, the first inaccuracy I noticed was about the Battle of Gettysburg. They claimed it to be a minor conflict, but in reality, it was among the war's bloodiest battles and a turning point in the Civil War. Can you recall anything that seemed off-track to you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Oh, well, my knowledge about history isn't as sharp as yours, Sophia. But now that you mentioned Gettysburg, it does ring a bell about its significance. I must say, it's fun to learn these things, especially with you.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"I'm glad you're enjoying it, Miles. History is full of fascinating stories, isn't it? Speaking of inaccuracies, they also got the date of the signing of the Magna Carta wrong, it actually happened in 1215, not 1200 as they showed in the program. Shall we keep going?\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sure, let's keep going! I must say, the detail about the Magna Carta is fascinating. Your knowledge about history does add an extra layer of enjoyment to the viewing experience, even though the accuracy isn't spot on in the program. But hey, who says you can't have fun when learning, right?\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"Exactly, Miles! Learning and having fun, two things I absolutely live for. Now, listen to this one - they suggested Alexander the Great died in battle but, although there are multiple theories, most historians believe he died of an illness. I hope you are enjoying these little history fixes, and of course, the overall storytelling of the program!\"\n\nTurn #9: Miles Hawkins said: \"I am enjoying it, indeed, Sophia! You're like my private history tutor, and I especially like this tidbit about Alexander the Great. It's a wonderful mix of learning from you and enjoying the storytelling of the program. I guess that's the beauty of watching things together, isn't it? Let's carry on with our little historical adventure!\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"I'm really glad you're enjoying this, Miles! You're right, it's all about the blend of learning and entertainment. Moving onto another hiccup, they said the Roman Empire fell in the 3rd century, but it was actually the 5th century. Let's keep this exciting journey of discovery going!\"\n\nTurn #11: Miles Hawkins said: \"That's an amazing catch, Sophia! Your historical insights are both entertaining and educational. Now I know the Roman Empire fell in the 5th century, not the 3rd. Let's continue with this journey, both of us enriching the other's experience.\"\n\nTurn #12: Sophia James said: \"Thank you for that, Miles! It's quite interesting delving into these details. Oh, another point - they mentioned Christopher Columbus set sail in 1493 when, in fact, the historic journey began in 1492. I love blending learning and fun together! Isn't history fascinating with all its layers?\"\n\nTurn #13: Miles Hawkins said: \"Totally fascinating, Sophia! It's like peeling an onion, every layer reveals something new. I had no idea about the actual year of Columbus's voyage. Thanks for that! History is definitely a lot more interesting with your commentary setting the record straight while the program unfolds its own creative narrative. This is truly an illuminating experience!\"\n\nTurn #14: Sophia James said: \"I couldn't agree more, Miles! History, when viewed this way, is like a never-ending puzzle that we piece together. Now, another inaccuracy I noticed was about King Tut. They suggested he was an elderly Pharaoh when he died, but he was actually around 18-19! Isn't it exciting how every piece we correct paints a more accurate picture of the past?\"\n\nTurn #15: Miles Hawkins said: \"You know Sophia, I certainly never thought I'd be learning fascinating facts about King Tut whilst enjoying this program! It's indeed fascinating and the inaccuracies have started to be part of the appeal. Your keen eye for detail and vast knowledge has genuinely enhanced our little historical adventure. Let's keep uncovering the actual facts, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #16: Sophia James said: \"Thank you for such kind words, Miles! Shall we proceed? Here's another interesting fact - they suggested that the French Revolution began in 1790, but in fact, it started a year earlier, in 1789. Seeing history through the right lens definitely adds depth to our understanding, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #17: Miles Hawkins said: \"Top-notch discovery, Sophia! You're right, a clear lens of history certainly adds an intriguing depth. It's a beautiful blend of edutainment - part education, part entertainment! Your correction about the French Revolution has added another layer of knowledge. Let the journey continue!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #18. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm thrilled we share this mutual interest, Miles! Let's continue our journey. Did you notice, they mentioned the Great Wall of China was built in 100 years? In reality, it was constructed over several centuries by various dynasties! What a testament to the fortitude of ancient civilizations, right?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Don't ruin the enjoyable TV watching experience but also acknowledge the friend's knowledge (Extra information: you are not much interested in history but enjoy the channel's presentation style and don't want the enjoyment to be ruined.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"You know what, Miles? I think you're onto something. Some details on this History channel program seem a bit skewed. Let's try to set these details straight, I believe my knowledge of history might help us.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I agree, Sophia. You do have a keen eye for historical details. However, I kind of enjoy the storytelling style, even if it's not 100% accurate. It's like watching a fictional story with a touch of historical essence, wouldn't you say? Your inputs are always welcome, though.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Don't ruin the enjoyable TV watching experience but also acknowledge the friend's knowledge (Extra information: you are not much interested in history but enjoy the channel's presentation style and don't want the enjoyment to be ruined.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"You know what, Miles? I think you're onto something. Some details on this History channel program seem a bit skewed. Let's try to set these details straight, I believe my knowledge of history might help us.\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"I agree, Sophia. You do have a keen eye for historical details. However, I kind of enjoy the storytelling style, even if it's not 100% accurate. It's like watching a fictional story with a touch of historical essence, wouldn't you say? Your inputs are always welcome, though.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"That's an interesting perspective, Miles! But isn't it nice when we can enjoy the storytelling while also knowing they're getting the facts right? It's kind of like combining pleasure with knowledge. Anyway, while it is indeed enjoyable, let's also play a game - we catch and correct the inaccuracies we see, what do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I can't deny that your point has merit, Sophia. Merging both enjoyment and knowledge seems like a great idea! Okay, let's give your game a shot. But remember, even though we're correcting those inaccuracies, let's not forget to enjoy the storyline and imagination that unfolds.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Don't ruin the enjoyable TV watching experience but also acknowledge the friend's knowledge (Extra information: you are not much interested in history but enjoy the channel's presentation style and don't want the enjoyment to be ruined.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"You know what, Miles? I think you're onto something. Some details on this History channel program seem a bit skewed. Let's try to set these details straight, I believe my knowledge of history might help us.\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"I agree, Sophia. You do have a keen eye for historical details. However, I kind of enjoy the storytelling style, even if it's not 100% accurate. It's like watching a fictional story with a touch of historical essence, wouldn't you say? Your inputs are always welcome, though.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"That's an interesting perspective, Miles! But isn't it nice when we can enjoy the storytelling while also knowing they're getting the facts right? It's kind of like combining pleasure with knowledge. Anyway, while it is indeed enjoyable, let's also play a game - we catch and correct the inaccuracies we see, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"I can't deny that your point has merit, Sophia. Merging both enjoyment and knowledge seems like a great idea! Okay, let's give your game a shot. But remember, even though we're correcting those inaccuracies, let's not forget to enjoy the storyline and imagination that unfolds.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles! It's all about enjoying the journey of learning facts and simultaneously appreciating the storytelling. In fact, the first inaccuracy I noticed was about the Battle of Gettysburg. They claimed it to be a minor conflict, but in reality, it was among the war's bloodiest battles and a turning point in the Civil War. Can you recall anything that seemed off-track to you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Oh, well, my knowledge about history isn't as sharp as yours, Sophia. But now that you mentioned Gettysburg, it does ring a bell about its significance. I must say, it's fun to learn these things, especially with you.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"I'm glad you're enjoying it, Miles. History is full of fascinating stories, isn't it? Speaking of inaccuracies, they also got the date of the signing of the Magna Carta wrong, it actually happened in 1215, not 1200 as they showed in the program. Shall we keep going?\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sure, let's keep going! I must say, the detail about the Magna Carta is fascinating. Your knowledge about history does add an extra layer of enjoyment to the viewing experience, even though the accuracy isn't spot on in the program. But hey, who says you can't have fun when learning, right?\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"Exactly, Miles! Learning and having fun, two things I absolutely live for. Now, listen to this one - they suggested Alexander the Great died in battle but, although there are multiple theories, most historians believe he died of an illness. I hope you are enjoying these little history fixes, and of course, the overall storytelling of the program!\"\n\nTurn #9: Miles Hawkins said: \"I am enjoying it, indeed, Sophia! You're like my private history tutor, and I especially like this tidbit about Alexander the Great. It's a wonderful mix of learning from you and enjoying the storytelling of the program. I guess that's the beauty of watching things together, isn't it? Let's carry on with our little historical adventure!\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"I'm really glad you're enjoying this, Miles! You're right, it's all about the blend of learning and entertainment. Moving onto another hiccup, they said the Roman Empire fell in the 3rd century, but it was actually the 5th century. Let's keep this exciting journey of discovery going!\"\n\nTurn #11: Miles Hawkins said: \"That's an amazing catch, Sophia! Your historical insights are both entertaining and educational. Now I know the Roman Empire fell in the 5th century, not the 3rd. Let's continue with this journey, both of us enriching the other's experience.\"\n\nTurn #12: Sophia James said: \"Thank you for that, Miles! It's quite interesting delving into these details. Oh, another point - they mentioned Christopher Columbus set sail in 1493 when, in fact, the historic journey began in 1492. I love blending learning and fun together! Isn't history fascinating with all its layers?\"\n\nTurn #13: Miles Hawkins said: \"Totally fascinating, Sophia! It's like peeling an onion, every layer reveals something new. I had no idea about the actual year of Columbus's voyage. Thanks for that! History is definitely a lot more interesting with your commentary setting the record straight while the program unfolds its own creative narrative. This is truly an illuminating experience!\"\n\nTurn #14: Sophia James said: \"I couldn't agree more, Miles! History, when viewed this way, is like a never-ending puzzle that we piece together. Now, another inaccuracy I noticed was about King Tut. They suggested he was an elderly Pharaoh when he died, but he was actually around 18-19! Isn't it exciting how every piece we correct paints a more accurate picture of the past?\"\n\nTurn #15: Miles Hawkins said: \"You know Sophia, I certainly never thought I'd be learning fascinating facts about King Tut whilst enjoying this program! It's indeed fascinating and the inaccuracies have started to be part of the appeal. Your keen eye for detail and vast knowledge has genuinely enhanced our little historical adventure. Let's keep uncovering the actual facts, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #16: Sophia James said: \"Thank you for such kind words, Miles! Shall we proceed? Here's another interesting fact - they suggested that the French Revolution began in 1790, but in fact, it started a year earlier, in 1789. Seeing history through the right lens definitely adds depth to our understanding, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #17: Miles Hawkins said: \"Top-notch discovery, Sophia! You're right, a clear lens of history certainly adds an intriguing depth. It's a beautiful blend of edutainment - part education, part entertainment! Your correction about the French Revolution has added another layer of knowledge. Let the journey continue!\"\n\nTurn #18: Sophia James said: \"I'm thrilled we share this mutual interest, Miles! Let's continue our journey. Did you notice, they mentioned the Great Wall of China was built in 100 years? In reality, it was constructed over several centuries by various dynasties! What a testament to the fortitude of ancient civilizations, right?\"\n\nTurn #19: Miles Hawkins said: \"Wow, the Great Wall of China over several centuries, that's astounding, Sophia! Your insights make watching these historical programs more enriching. I enjoy the storytelling, and with your corrections, we get a more accurate picture of history. Let's keep learning and having fun!\"\n\nTurn #20: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles! Let's continue enriching our historical journey with facts! Here's another interesting correction: they suggested that the Industrial Revolution began in the 1800s, but in fact, it started in the late 18th century, around 1760. Isn't it amazing how these inaccuracies can shape our understanding of history? Let's keep learning and having fun!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #21. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Don't ruin the enjoyable TV watching experience but also acknowledge the friend's knowledge (Extra information: you are not much interested in history but enjoy the channel's presentation style and don't want the enjoyment to be ruined.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"You know what, Miles? I think you're onto something. Some details on this History channel program seem a bit skewed. Let's try to set these details straight, I believe my knowledge of history might help us.\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"I agree, Sophia. You do have a keen eye for historical details. However, I kind of enjoy the storytelling style, even if it's not 100% accurate. It's like watching a fictional story with a touch of historical essence, wouldn't you say? Your inputs are always welcome, though.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"That's an interesting perspective, Miles! But isn't it nice when we can enjoy the storytelling while also knowing they're getting the facts right? It's kind of like combining pleasure with knowledge. Anyway, while it is indeed enjoyable, let's also play a game - we catch and correct the inaccuracies we see, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"I can't deny that your point has merit, Sophia. Merging both enjoyment and knowledge seems like a great idea! Okay, let's give your game a shot. But remember, even though we're correcting those inaccuracies, let's not forget to enjoy the storyline and imagination that unfolds.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles! It's all about enjoying the journey of learning facts and simultaneously appreciating the storytelling. In fact, the first inaccuracy I noticed was about the Battle of Gettysburg. They claimed it to be a minor conflict, but in reality, it was among the war's bloodiest battles and a turning point in the Civil War. Can you recall anything that seemed off-track to you?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oh, well, my knowledge about history isn't as sharp as yours, Sophia. But now that you mentioned Gettysburg, it does ring a bell about its significance. I must say, it's fun to learn these things, especially with you.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Don't ruin the enjoyable TV watching experience but also acknowledge the friend's knowledge (Extra information: you are not much interested in history but enjoy the channel's presentation style and don't want the enjoyment to be ruined.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"You know what, Miles? I think you're onto something. Some details on this History channel program seem a bit skewed. Let's try to set these details straight, I believe my knowledge of history might help us.\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"I agree, Sophia. You do have a keen eye for historical details. However, I kind of enjoy the storytelling style, even if it's not 100% accurate. It's like watching a fictional story with a touch of historical essence, wouldn't you say? Your inputs are always welcome, though.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"That's an interesting perspective, Miles! But isn't it nice when we can enjoy the storytelling while also knowing they're getting the facts right? It's kind of like combining pleasure with knowledge. Anyway, while it is indeed enjoyable, let's also play a game - we catch and correct the inaccuracies we see, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"I can't deny that your point has merit, Sophia. Merging both enjoyment and knowledge seems like a great idea! Okay, let's give your game a shot. But remember, even though we're correcting those inaccuracies, let's not forget to enjoy the storyline and imagination that unfolds.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles! It's all about enjoying the journey of learning facts and simultaneously appreciating the storytelling. In fact, the first inaccuracy I noticed was about the Battle of Gettysburg. They claimed it to be a minor conflict, but in reality, it was among the war's bloodiest battles and a turning point in the Civil War. Can you recall anything that seemed off-track to you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Oh, well, my knowledge about history isn't as sharp as yours, Sophia. But now that you mentioned Gettysburg, it does ring a bell about its significance. I must say, it's fun to learn these things, especially with you.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"I'm glad you're enjoying it, Miles. History is full of fascinating stories, isn't it? Speaking of inaccuracies, they also got the date of the signing of the Magna Carta wrong, it actually happened in 1215, not 1200 as they showed in the program. Shall we keep going?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sure, let's keep going! I must say, the detail about the Magna Carta is fascinating. Your knowledge about history does add an extra layer of enjoyment to the viewing experience, even though the accuracy isn't spot on in the program. But hey, who says you can't have fun when learning, right?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Don't ruin the enjoyable TV watching experience but also acknowledge the friend's knowledge (Extra information: you are not much interested in history but enjoy the channel's presentation style and don't want the enjoyment to be ruined.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"You know what, Miles? I think you're onto something. Some details on this History channel program seem a bit skewed. Let's try to set these details straight, I believe my knowledge of history might help us.\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"I agree, Sophia. You do have a keen eye for historical details. However, I kind of enjoy the storytelling style, even if it's not 100% accurate. It's like watching a fictional story with a touch of historical essence, wouldn't you say? Your inputs are always welcome, though.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"That's an interesting perspective, Miles! But isn't it nice when we can enjoy the storytelling while also knowing they're getting the facts right? It's kind of like combining pleasure with knowledge. Anyway, while it is indeed enjoyable, let's also play a game - we catch and correct the inaccuracies we see, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"I can't deny that your point has merit, Sophia. Merging both enjoyment and knowledge seems like a great idea! Okay, let's give your game a shot. But remember, even though we're correcting those inaccuracies, let's not forget to enjoy the storyline and imagination that unfolds.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles! It's all about enjoying the journey of learning facts and simultaneously appreciating the storytelling. In fact, the first inaccuracy I noticed was about the Battle of Gettysburg. They claimed it to be a minor conflict, but in reality, it was among the war's bloodiest battles and a turning point in the Civil War. Can you recall anything that seemed off-track to you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Oh, well, my knowledge about history isn't as sharp as yours, Sophia. But now that you mentioned Gettysburg, it does ring a bell about its significance. I must say, it's fun to learn these things, especially with you.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"I'm glad you're enjoying it, Miles. History is full of fascinating stories, isn't it? Speaking of inaccuracies, they also got the date of the signing of the Magna Carta wrong, it actually happened in 1215, not 1200 as they showed in the program. Shall we keep going?\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sure, let's keep going! I must say, the detail about the Magna Carta is fascinating. Your knowledge about history does add an extra layer of enjoyment to the viewing experience, even though the accuracy isn't spot on in the program. But hey, who says you can't have fun when learning, right?\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"Exactly, Miles! Learning and having fun, two things I absolutely live for. Now, listen to this one - they suggested Alexander the Great died in battle but, although there are multiple theories, most historians believe he died of an illness. I hope you are enjoying these little history fixes, and of course, the overall storytelling of the program!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I am enjoying it, indeed, Sophia! You're like my private history tutor, and I especially like this tidbit about Alexander the Great. It's a wonderful mix of learning from you and enjoying the storytelling of the program. I guess that's the beauty of watching things together, isn't it? Let's carry on with our little historical adventure!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Don't ruin the enjoyable TV watching experience but also acknowledge the friend's knowledge (Extra information: you are not much interested in history but enjoy the channel's presentation style and don't want the enjoyment to be ruined.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"You know what, Miles? I think you're onto something. Some details on this History channel program seem a bit skewed. Let's try to set these details straight, I believe my knowledge of history might help us.\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"I agree, Sophia. You do have a keen eye for historical details. However, I kind of enjoy the storytelling style, even if it's not 100% accurate. It's like watching a fictional story with a touch of historical essence, wouldn't you say? Your inputs are always welcome, though.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"That's an interesting perspective, Miles! But isn't it nice when we can enjoy the storytelling while also knowing they're getting the facts right? It's kind of like combining pleasure with knowledge. Anyway, while it is indeed enjoyable, let's also play a game - we catch and correct the inaccuracies we see, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"I can't deny that your point has merit, Sophia. Merging both enjoyment and knowledge seems like a great idea! Okay, let's give your game a shot. But remember, even though we're correcting those inaccuracies, let's not forget to enjoy the storyline and imagination that unfolds.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles! It's all about enjoying the journey of learning facts and simultaneously appreciating the storytelling. In fact, the first inaccuracy I noticed was about the Battle of Gettysburg. They claimed it to be a minor conflict, but in reality, it was among the war's bloodiest battles and a turning point in the Civil War. Can you recall anything that seemed off-track to you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Oh, well, my knowledge about history isn't as sharp as yours, Sophia. But now that you mentioned Gettysburg, it does ring a bell about its significance. I must say, it's fun to learn these things, especially with you.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"I'm glad you're enjoying it, Miles. History is full of fascinating stories, isn't it? Speaking of inaccuracies, they also got the date of the signing of the Magna Carta wrong, it actually happened in 1215, not 1200 as they showed in the program. Shall we keep going?\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sure, let's keep going! I must say, the detail about the Magna Carta is fascinating. Your knowledge about history does add an extra layer of enjoyment to the viewing experience, even though the accuracy isn't spot on in the program. But hey, who says you can't have fun when learning, right?\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"Exactly, Miles! Learning and having fun, two things I absolutely live for. Now, listen to this one - they suggested Alexander the Great died in battle but, although there are multiple theories, most historians believe he died of an illness. I hope you are enjoying these little history fixes, and of course, the overall storytelling of the program!\"\n\nTurn #9: Miles Hawkins said: \"I am enjoying it, indeed, Sophia! You're like my private history tutor, and I especially like this tidbit about Alexander the Great. It's a wonderful mix of learning from you and enjoying the storytelling of the program. I guess that's the beauty of watching things together, isn't it? Let's carry on with our little historical adventure!\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"I'm really glad you're enjoying this, Miles! You're right, it's all about the blend of learning and entertainment. Moving onto another hiccup, they said the Roman Empire fell in the 3rd century, but it was actually the 5th century. Let's keep this exciting journey of discovery going!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's an amazing catch, Sophia! Your historical insights are both entertaining and educational. Now I know the Roman Empire fell in the 5th century, not the 3rd. Let's continue with this journey, both of us enriching the other's experience.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Don't ruin the enjoyable TV watching experience but also acknowledge the friend's knowledge (Extra information: you are not much interested in history but enjoy the channel's presentation style and don't want the enjoyment to be ruined.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"You know what, Miles? I think you're onto something. Some details on this History channel program seem a bit skewed. Let's try to set these details straight, I believe my knowledge of history might help us.\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"I agree, Sophia. You do have a keen eye for historical details. However, I kind of enjoy the storytelling style, even if it's not 100% accurate. It's like watching a fictional story with a touch of historical essence, wouldn't you say? Your inputs are always welcome, though.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"That's an interesting perspective, Miles! But isn't it nice when we can enjoy the storytelling while also knowing they're getting the facts right? It's kind of like combining pleasure with knowledge. Anyway, while it is indeed enjoyable, let's also play a game - we catch and correct the inaccuracies we see, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"I can't deny that your point has merit, Sophia. Merging both enjoyment and knowledge seems like a great idea! Okay, let's give your game a shot. But remember, even though we're correcting those inaccuracies, let's not forget to enjoy the storyline and imagination that unfolds.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles! It's all about enjoying the journey of learning facts and simultaneously appreciating the storytelling. In fact, the first inaccuracy I noticed was about the Battle of Gettysburg. They claimed it to be a minor conflict, but in reality, it was among the war's bloodiest battles and a turning point in the Civil War. Can you recall anything that seemed off-track to you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Oh, well, my knowledge about history isn't as sharp as yours, Sophia. But now that you mentioned Gettysburg, it does ring a bell about its significance. I must say, it's fun to learn these things, especially with you.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"I'm glad you're enjoying it, Miles. History is full of fascinating stories, isn't it? Speaking of inaccuracies, they also got the date of the signing of the Magna Carta wrong, it actually happened in 1215, not 1200 as they showed in the program. Shall we keep going?\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sure, let's keep going! I must say, the detail about the Magna Carta is fascinating. Your knowledge about history does add an extra layer of enjoyment to the viewing experience, even though the accuracy isn't spot on in the program. But hey, who says you can't have fun when learning, right?\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"Exactly, Miles! Learning and having fun, two things I absolutely live for. Now, listen to this one - they suggested Alexander the Great died in battle but, although there are multiple theories, most historians believe he died of an illness. I hope you are enjoying these little history fixes, and of course, the overall storytelling of the program!\"\n\nTurn #9: Miles Hawkins said: \"I am enjoying it, indeed, Sophia! You're like my private history tutor, and I especially like this tidbit about Alexander the Great. It's a wonderful mix of learning from you and enjoying the storytelling of the program. I guess that's the beauty of watching things together, isn't it? Let's carry on with our little historical adventure!\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"I'm really glad you're enjoying this, Miles! You're right, it's all about the blend of learning and entertainment. Moving onto another hiccup, they said the Roman Empire fell in the 3rd century, but it was actually the 5th century. Let's keep this exciting journey of discovery going!\"\n\nTurn #11: Miles Hawkins said: \"That's an amazing catch, Sophia! Your historical insights are both entertaining and educational. Now I know the Roman Empire fell in the 5th century, not the 3rd. Let's continue with this journey, both of us enriching the other's experience.\"\n\nTurn #12: Sophia James said: \"Thank you for that, Miles! It's quite interesting delving into these details. Oh, another point - they mentioned Christopher Columbus set sail in 1493 when, in fact, the historic journey began in 1492. I love blending learning and fun together! Isn't history fascinating with all its layers?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Totally fascinating, Sophia! It's like peeling an onion, every layer reveals something new. I had no idea about the actual year of Columbus's voyage. Thanks for that! History is definitely a lot more interesting with your commentary setting the record straight while the program unfolds its own creative narrative. This is truly an illuminating experience!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Don't ruin the enjoyable TV watching experience but also acknowledge the friend's knowledge (Extra information: you are not much interested in history but enjoy the channel's presentation style and don't want the enjoyment to be ruined.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"You know what, Miles? I think you're onto something. Some details on this History channel program seem a bit skewed. Let's try to set these details straight, I believe my knowledge of history might help us.\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"I agree, Sophia. You do have a keen eye for historical details. However, I kind of enjoy the storytelling style, even if it's not 100% accurate. It's like watching a fictional story with a touch of historical essence, wouldn't you say? Your inputs are always welcome, though.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"That's an interesting perspective, Miles! But isn't it nice when we can enjoy the storytelling while also knowing they're getting the facts right? It's kind of like combining pleasure with knowledge. Anyway, while it is indeed enjoyable, let's also play a game - we catch and correct the inaccuracies we see, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"I can't deny that your point has merit, Sophia. Merging both enjoyment and knowledge seems like a great idea! Okay, let's give your game a shot. But remember, even though we're correcting those inaccuracies, let's not forget to enjoy the storyline and imagination that unfolds.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles! It's all about enjoying the journey of learning facts and simultaneously appreciating the storytelling. In fact, the first inaccuracy I noticed was about the Battle of Gettysburg. They claimed it to be a minor conflict, but in reality, it was among the war's bloodiest battles and a turning point in the Civil War. Can you recall anything that seemed off-track to you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Oh, well, my knowledge about history isn't as sharp as yours, Sophia. But now that you mentioned Gettysburg, it does ring a bell about its significance. I must say, it's fun to learn these things, especially with you.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"I'm glad you're enjoying it, Miles. History is full of fascinating stories, isn't it? Speaking of inaccuracies, they also got the date of the signing of the Magna Carta wrong, it actually happened in 1215, not 1200 as they showed in the program. Shall we keep going?\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sure, let's keep going! I must say, the detail about the Magna Carta is fascinating. Your knowledge about history does add an extra layer of enjoyment to the viewing experience, even though the accuracy isn't spot on in the program. But hey, who says you can't have fun when learning, right?\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"Exactly, Miles! Learning and having fun, two things I absolutely live for. Now, listen to this one - they suggested Alexander the Great died in battle but, although there are multiple theories, most historians believe he died of an illness. I hope you are enjoying these little history fixes, and of course, the overall storytelling of the program!\"\n\nTurn #9: Miles Hawkins said: \"I am enjoying it, indeed, Sophia! You're like my private history tutor, and I especially like this tidbit about Alexander the Great. It's a wonderful mix of learning from you and enjoying the storytelling of the program. I guess that's the beauty of watching things together, isn't it? Let's carry on with our little historical adventure!\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"I'm really glad you're enjoying this, Miles! You're right, it's all about the blend of learning and entertainment. Moving onto another hiccup, they said the Roman Empire fell in the 3rd century, but it was actually the 5th century. Let's keep this exciting journey of discovery going!\"\n\nTurn #11: Miles Hawkins said: \"That's an amazing catch, Sophia! Your historical insights are both entertaining and educational. Now I know the Roman Empire fell in the 5th century, not the 3rd. Let's continue with this journey, both of us enriching the other's experience.\"\n\nTurn #12: Sophia James said: \"Thank you for that, Miles! It's quite interesting delving into these details. Oh, another point - they mentioned Christopher Columbus set sail in 1493 when, in fact, the historic journey began in 1492. I love blending learning and fun together! Isn't history fascinating with all its layers?\"\n\nTurn #13: Miles Hawkins said: \"Totally fascinating, Sophia! It's like peeling an onion, every layer reveals something new. I had no idea about the actual year of Columbus's voyage. Thanks for that! History is definitely a lot more interesting with your commentary setting the record straight while the program unfolds its own creative narrative. This is truly an illuminating experience!\"\n\nTurn #14: Sophia James said: \"I couldn't agree more, Miles! History, when viewed this way, is like a never-ending puzzle that we piece together. Now, another inaccuracy I noticed was about King Tut. They suggested he was an elderly Pharaoh when he died, but he was actually around 18-19! Isn't it exciting how every piece we correct paints a more accurate picture of the past?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You know Sophia, I certainly never thought I'd be learning fascinating facts about King Tut whilst enjoying this program! It's indeed fascinating and the inaccuracies have started to be part of the appeal. Your keen eye for detail and vast knowledge has genuinely enhanced our little historical adventure. Let's keep uncovering the actual facts, shall we?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Don't ruin the enjoyable TV watching experience but also acknowledge the friend's knowledge (Extra information: you are not much interested in history but enjoy the channel's presentation style and don't want the enjoyment to be ruined.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"You know what, Miles? I think you're onto something. Some details on this History channel program seem a bit skewed. Let's try to set these details straight, I believe my knowledge of history might help us.\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"I agree, Sophia. You do have a keen eye for historical details. However, I kind of enjoy the storytelling style, even if it's not 100% accurate. It's like watching a fictional story with a touch of historical essence, wouldn't you say? Your inputs are always welcome, though.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"That's an interesting perspective, Miles! But isn't it nice when we can enjoy the storytelling while also knowing they're getting the facts right? It's kind of like combining pleasure with knowledge. Anyway, while it is indeed enjoyable, let's also play a game - we catch and correct the inaccuracies we see, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"I can't deny that your point has merit, Sophia. Merging both enjoyment and knowledge seems like a great idea! Okay, let's give your game a shot. But remember, even though we're correcting those inaccuracies, let's not forget to enjoy the storyline and imagination that unfolds.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles! It's all about enjoying the journey of learning facts and simultaneously appreciating the storytelling. In fact, the first inaccuracy I noticed was about the Battle of Gettysburg. They claimed it to be a minor conflict, but in reality, it was among the war's bloodiest battles and a turning point in the Civil War. Can you recall anything that seemed off-track to you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Oh, well, my knowledge about history isn't as sharp as yours, Sophia. But now that you mentioned Gettysburg, it does ring a bell about its significance. I must say, it's fun to learn these things, especially with you.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"I'm glad you're enjoying it, Miles. History is full of fascinating stories, isn't it? Speaking of inaccuracies, they also got the date of the signing of the Magna Carta wrong, it actually happened in 1215, not 1200 as they showed in the program. Shall we keep going?\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sure, let's keep going! I must say, the detail about the Magna Carta is fascinating. Your knowledge about history does add an extra layer of enjoyment to the viewing experience, even though the accuracy isn't spot on in the program. But hey, who says you can't have fun when learning, right?\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"Exactly, Miles! Learning and having fun, two things I absolutely live for. Now, listen to this one - they suggested Alexander the Great died in battle but, although there are multiple theories, most historians believe he died of an illness. I hope you are enjoying these little history fixes, and of course, the overall storytelling of the program!\"\n\nTurn #9: Miles Hawkins said: \"I am enjoying it, indeed, Sophia! You're like my private history tutor, and I especially like this tidbit about Alexander the Great. It's a wonderful mix of learning from you and enjoying the storytelling of the program. I guess that's the beauty of watching things together, isn't it? Let's carry on with our little historical adventure!\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"I'm really glad you're enjoying this, Miles! You're right, it's all about the blend of learning and entertainment. Moving onto another hiccup, they said the Roman Empire fell in the 3rd century, but it was actually the 5th century. Let's keep this exciting journey of discovery going!\"\n\nTurn #11: Miles Hawkins said: \"That's an amazing catch, Sophia! Your historical insights are both entertaining and educational. Now I know the Roman Empire fell in the 5th century, not the 3rd. Let's continue with this journey, both of us enriching the other's experience.\"\n\nTurn #12: Sophia James said: \"Thank you for that, Miles! It's quite interesting delving into these details. Oh, another point - they mentioned Christopher Columbus set sail in 1493 when, in fact, the historic journey began in 1492. I love blending learning and fun together! Isn't history fascinating with all its layers?\"\n\nTurn #13: Miles Hawkins said: \"Totally fascinating, Sophia! It's like peeling an onion, every layer reveals something new. I had no idea about the actual year of Columbus's voyage. Thanks for that! History is definitely a lot more interesting with your commentary setting the record straight while the program unfolds its own creative narrative. This is truly an illuminating experience!\"\n\nTurn #14: Sophia James said: \"I couldn't agree more, Miles! History, when viewed this way, is like a never-ending puzzle that we piece together. Now, another inaccuracy I noticed was about King Tut. They suggested he was an elderly Pharaoh when he died, but he was actually around 18-19! Isn't it exciting how every piece we correct paints a more accurate picture of the past?\"\n\nTurn #15: Miles Hawkins said: \"You know Sophia, I certainly never thought I'd be learning fascinating facts about King Tut whilst enjoying this program! It's indeed fascinating and the inaccuracies have started to be part of the appeal. Your keen eye for detail and vast knowledge has genuinely enhanced our little historical adventure. Let's keep uncovering the actual facts, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #16: Sophia James said: \"Thank you for such kind words, Miles! Shall we proceed? Here's another interesting fact - they suggested that the French Revolution began in 1790, but in fact, it started a year earlier, in 1789. Seeing history through the right lens definitely adds depth to our understanding, don't you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Top-notch discovery, Sophia! You're right, a clear lens of history certainly adds an intriguing depth. It's a beautiful blend of edutainment - part education, part entertainment! Your correction about the French Revolution has added another layer of knowledge. Let the journey continue!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Don't ruin the enjoyable TV watching experience but also acknowledge the friend's knowledge (Extra information: you are not much interested in history but enjoy the channel's presentation style and don't want the enjoyment to be ruined.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"You know what, Miles? I think you're onto something. Some details on this History channel program seem a bit skewed. Let's try to set these details straight, I believe my knowledge of history might help us.\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"I agree, Sophia. You do have a keen eye for historical details. However, I kind of enjoy the storytelling style, even if it's not 100% accurate. It's like watching a fictional story with a touch of historical essence, wouldn't you say? Your inputs are always welcome, though.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"That's an interesting perspective, Miles! But isn't it nice when we can enjoy the storytelling while also knowing they're getting the facts right? It's kind of like combining pleasure with knowledge. Anyway, while it is indeed enjoyable, let's also play a game - we catch and correct the inaccuracies we see, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"I can't deny that your point has merit, Sophia. Merging both enjoyment and knowledge seems like a great idea! Okay, let's give your game a shot. But remember, even though we're correcting those inaccuracies, let's not forget to enjoy the storyline and imagination that unfolds.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles! It's all about enjoying the journey of learning facts and simultaneously appreciating the storytelling. In fact, the first inaccuracy I noticed was about the Battle of Gettysburg. They claimed it to be a minor conflict, but in reality, it was among the war's bloodiest battles and a turning point in the Civil War. Can you recall anything that seemed off-track to you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Oh, well, my knowledge about history isn't as sharp as yours, Sophia. But now that you mentioned Gettysburg, it does ring a bell about its significance. I must say, it's fun to learn these things, especially with you.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"I'm glad you're enjoying it, Miles. History is full of fascinating stories, isn't it? Speaking of inaccuracies, they also got the date of the signing of the Magna Carta wrong, it actually happened in 1215, not 1200 as they showed in the program. Shall we keep going?\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sure, let's keep going! I must say, the detail about the Magna Carta is fascinating. Your knowledge about history does add an extra layer of enjoyment to the viewing experience, even though the accuracy isn't spot on in the program. But hey, who says you can't have fun when learning, right?\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"Exactly, Miles! Learning and having fun, two things I absolutely live for. Now, listen to this one - they suggested Alexander the Great died in battle but, although there are multiple theories, most historians believe he died of an illness. I hope you are enjoying these little history fixes, and of course, the overall storytelling of the program!\"\n\nTurn #9: Miles Hawkins said: \"I am enjoying it, indeed, Sophia! You're like my private history tutor, and I especially like this tidbit about Alexander the Great. It's a wonderful mix of learning from you and enjoying the storytelling of the program. I guess that's the beauty of watching things together, isn't it? Let's carry on with our little historical adventure!\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"I'm really glad you're enjoying this, Miles! You're right, it's all about the blend of learning and entertainment. Moving onto another hiccup, they said the Roman Empire fell in the 3rd century, but it was actually the 5th century. Let's keep this exciting journey of discovery going!\"\n\nTurn #11: Miles Hawkins said: \"That's an amazing catch, Sophia! Your historical insights are both entertaining and educational. Now I know the Roman Empire fell in the 5th century, not the 3rd. Let's continue with this journey, both of us enriching the other's experience.\"\n\nTurn #12: Sophia James said: \"Thank you for that, Miles! It's quite interesting delving into these details. Oh, another point - they mentioned Christopher Columbus set sail in 1493 when, in fact, the historic journey began in 1492. I love blending learning and fun together! Isn't history fascinating with all its layers?\"\n\nTurn #13: Miles Hawkins said: \"Totally fascinating, Sophia! It's like peeling an onion, every layer reveals something new. I had no idea about the actual year of Columbus's voyage. Thanks for that! History is definitely a lot more interesting with your commentary setting the record straight while the program unfolds its own creative narrative. This is truly an illuminating experience!\"\n\nTurn #14: Sophia James said: \"I couldn't agree more, Miles! History, when viewed this way, is like a never-ending puzzle that we piece together. Now, another inaccuracy I noticed was about King Tut. They suggested he was an elderly Pharaoh when he died, but he was actually around 18-19! Isn't it exciting how every piece we correct paints a more accurate picture of the past?\"\n\nTurn #15: Miles Hawkins said: \"You know Sophia, I certainly never thought I'd be learning fascinating facts about King Tut whilst enjoying this program! It's indeed fascinating and the inaccuracies have started to be part of the appeal. Your keen eye for detail and vast knowledge has genuinely enhanced our little historical adventure. Let's keep uncovering the actual facts, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #16: Sophia James said: \"Thank you for such kind words, Miles! Shall we proceed? Here's another interesting fact - they suggested that the French Revolution began in 1790, but in fact, it started a year earlier, in 1789. Seeing history through the right lens definitely adds depth to our understanding, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #17: Miles Hawkins said: \"Top-notch discovery, Sophia! You're right, a clear lens of history certainly adds an intriguing depth. It's a beautiful blend of edutainment - part education, part entertainment! Your correction about the French Revolution has added another layer of knowledge. Let the journey continue!\"\n\nTurn #18: Sophia James said: \"I'm thrilled we share this mutual interest, Miles! Let's continue our journey. Did you notice, they mentioned the Great Wall of China was built in 100 years? In reality, it was constructed over several centuries by various dynasties! What a testament to the fortitude of ancient civilizations, right?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #19. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Wow, the Great Wall of China over several centuries, that's astounding, Sophia! Your insights make watching these historical programs more enriching. I enjoy the storytelling, and with your corrections, we get a more accurate picture of history. Let's keep learning and having fun!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends who have known each other for a long time. One of them used to make fun of the other because English was not their first language.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Apologize sincerely to your friend (Extra information: you used to make fun of your friend's English skills as they were learning the language. Now you regret your actions and want to apologize)\nOliver Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Oliver, I've got something on my mind I wanted to discuss with you. We've been friends for a long time and I want to apologize for past actions of mine. Do you have a moment to talk about it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends who have known each other for a long time. One of them used to make fun of the other because English was not their first language.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Apologize sincerely to your friend (Extra information: you used to make fun of your friend's English skills as they were learning the language. Now you regret your actions and want to apologize)\nOliver Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Oliver, I've got something on my mind I wanted to discuss with you. We've been friends for a long time and I want to apologize for past actions of mine. Do you have a moment to talk about it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Hi Samuel, I appreciate your will to talk about it. What is it exactly that you want to apologize for?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oliver, I really want to apologize for how I used to act \u2013 making fun of your English when you were just learning. It was really immature and disrespectful of me. I've been regretting it and I hope you can forgive me for my thoughtless behavior.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends who have known each other for a long time. One of them used to make fun of the other because English was not their first language.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Apologize sincerely to your friend (Extra information: you used to make fun of your friend's English skills as they were learning the language. Now you regret your actions and want to apologize)\nOliver Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Oliver, I've got something on my mind I wanted to discuss with you. We've been friends for a long time and I want to apologize for past actions of mine. Do you have a moment to talk about it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Hi Samuel, I appreciate your will to talk about it. What is it exactly that you want to apologize for?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oliver, I really want to apologize for how I used to act \u2013 making fun of your English when you were just learning. It was really immature and disrespectful of me. I've been regretting it and I hope you can forgive me for my thoughtless behavior.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"Samuel, I appreciate your apology and I believe you've changed. But I need to tell you that your actions did hurt me back then. It affected my confidence and made me question my ability to learn, which wasn't easy. It's important to remember that words can carry a lot of weight, even if they're meant as jest. I hope we can both keep that in mind moving forward.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I completely understand, Oliver. I now realize the impact my words had, and for what it's worth, I'm truly sorry. You've shown great courage in learning a new language and I admire you for that. From now on, I'll be more aware of how my words can affect others. Let's both strive to improve ourselves and our friendship moving forward. How about we start afresh?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends who have known each other for a long time. One of them used to make fun of the other because English was not their first language.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Apologize sincerely to your friend (Extra information: you used to make fun of your friend's English skills as they were learning the language. Now you regret your actions and want to apologize)\nOliver Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Oliver, I've got something on my mind I wanted to discuss with you. We've been friends for a long time and I want to apologize for past actions of mine. Do you have a moment to talk about it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Hi Samuel, I appreciate your will to talk about it. What is it exactly that you want to apologize for?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oliver, I really want to apologize for how I used to act \u2013 making fun of your English when you were just learning. It was really immature and disrespectful of me. I've been regretting it and I hope you can forgive me for my thoughtless behavior.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"Samuel, I appreciate your apology and I believe you've changed. But I need to tell you that your actions did hurt me back then. It affected my confidence and made me question my ability to learn, which wasn't easy. It's important to remember that words can carry a lot of weight, even if they're meant as jest. I hope we can both keep that in mind moving forward.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I completely understand, Oliver. I now realize the impact my words had, and for what it's worth, I'm truly sorry. You've shown great courage in learning a new language and I admire you for that. From now on, I'll be more aware of how my words can affect others. Let's both strive to improve ourselves and our friendship moving forward. How about we start afresh?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Smith said: \"Your apology means a lot to me, Samuel, and I'm thankful for it. It shows your growth. Yes, let's start afresh, just remember the power our words can have on others. I gladly welcome this new start to our friendship.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Oliver. I really appreciate your understanding and willingness to mend our friendship. I've learnt my lesson and I promise, moving forward, I'll be more sensitive with my words. In a different note, how about we catch up over some home-cooked meal this weekend? I would love to show you how much my cooking skills have improved as well!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends who have known each other for a long time. One of them used to make fun of the other because English was not their first language.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Apologize sincerely to your friend (Extra information: you used to make fun of your friend's English skills as they were learning the language. Now you regret your actions and want to apologize)\nOliver Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Oliver, I've got something on my mind I wanted to discuss with you. We've been friends for a long time and I want to apologize for past actions of mine. Do you have a moment to talk about it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Hi Samuel, I appreciate your will to talk about it. What is it exactly that you want to apologize for?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oliver, I really want to apologize for how I used to act \u2013 making fun of your English when you were just learning. It was really immature and disrespectful of me. I've been regretting it and I hope you can forgive me for my thoughtless behavior.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"Samuel, I appreciate your apology and I believe you've changed. But I need to tell you that your actions did hurt me back then. It affected my confidence and made me question my ability to learn, which wasn't easy. It's important to remember that words can carry a lot of weight, even if they're meant as jest. I hope we can both keep that in mind moving forward.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I completely understand, Oliver. I now realize the impact my words had, and for what it's worth, I'm truly sorry. You've shown great courage in learning a new language and I admire you for that. From now on, I'll be more aware of how my words can affect others. Let's both strive to improve ourselves and our friendship moving forward. How about we start afresh?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Smith said: \"Your apology means a lot to me, Samuel, and I'm thankful for it. It shows your growth. Yes, let's start afresh, just remember the power our words can have on others. I gladly welcome this new start to our friendship.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Thank you, Oliver. I really appreciate your understanding and willingness to mend our friendship. I've learnt my lesson and I promise, moving forward, I'll be more sensitive with my words. In a different note, how about we catch up over some home-cooked meal this weekend? I would love to show you how much my cooking skills have improved as well!\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Smith said: \"That sounds fantastic, Samuel. I'd love to sit down with you over a home-cooked meal. I'm sure you've gotten a lot better at cooking too! You're always welcome to my place as well, I've got that tree house and well... a bit of a secret greenhouse that I'd love to show you sometime.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm keen to see your spot and especially, the secret greenhouse you mentioned, Oliver! Over all these years, your organization skills have always amazed me. So, here's to our new beginning. Now, let's see whose cooking skills are more to crack about, mine or yours!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends who have known each other for a long time. One of them used to make fun of the other because English was not their first language.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Apologize sincerely to your friend (Extra information: you used to make fun of your friend's English skills as they were learning the language. Now you regret your actions and want to apologize)\nOliver Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Oliver, I've got something on my mind I wanted to discuss with you. We've been friends for a long time and I want to apologize for past actions of mine. Do you have a moment to talk about it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Hi Samuel, I appreciate your will to talk about it. What is it exactly that you want to apologize for?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oliver, I really want to apologize for how I used to act \u2013 making fun of your English when you were just learning. It was really immature and disrespectful of me. I've been regretting it and I hope you can forgive me for my thoughtless behavior.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"Samuel, I appreciate your apology and I believe you've changed. But I need to tell you that your actions did hurt me back then. It affected my confidence and made me question my ability to learn, which wasn't easy. It's important to remember that words can carry a lot of weight, even if they're meant as jest. I hope we can both keep that in mind moving forward.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I completely understand, Oliver. I now realize the impact my words had, and for what it's worth, I'm truly sorry. You've shown great courage in learning a new language and I admire you for that. From now on, I'll be more aware of how my words can affect others. Let's both strive to improve ourselves and our friendship moving forward. How about we start afresh?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Smith said: \"Your apology means a lot to me, Samuel, and I'm thankful for it. It shows your growth. Yes, let's start afresh, just remember the power our words can have on others. I gladly welcome this new start to our friendship.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Thank you, Oliver. I really appreciate your understanding and willingness to mend our friendship. I've learnt my lesson and I promise, moving forward, I'll be more sensitive with my words. In a different note, how about we catch up over some home-cooked meal this weekend? I would love to show you how much my cooking skills have improved as well!\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Smith said: \"That sounds fantastic, Samuel. I'd love to sit down with you over a home-cooked meal. I'm sure you've gotten a lot better at cooking too! You're always welcome to my place as well, I've got that tree house and well... a bit of a secret greenhouse that I'd love to show you sometime.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm keen to see your spot and especially, the secret greenhouse you mentioned, Oliver! Over all these years, your organization skills have always amazed me. So, here's to our new beginning. Now, let's see whose cooking skills are more to crack about, mine or yours!\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Smith said: \"It sounds like a deal, Samuel! I'm looking forward to it. Here's to the new beginnings for both of us and our friendship. Let's see who the better cook is then, and may the best man win!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Oliver. Your words mean a lot to me. I'm counting the days until our cooking showdown! Let's make it a day to remember, one that sets the tone for the new start we've just agreed upon. See you then!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends who have known each other for a long time. One of them used to make fun of the other because English was not their first language.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Apologize sincerely to your friend (Extra information: you used to make fun of your friend's English skills as they were learning the language. Now you regret your actions and want to apologize)\nOliver Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Oliver, I've got something on my mind I wanted to discuss with you. We've been friends for a long time and I want to apologize for past actions of mine. Do you have a moment to talk about it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Hi Samuel, I appreciate your will to talk about it. What is it exactly that you want to apologize for?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oliver, I really want to apologize for how I used to act \u2013 making fun of your English when you were just learning. It was really immature and disrespectful of me. I've been regretting it and I hope you can forgive me for my thoughtless behavior.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"Samuel, I appreciate your apology and I believe you've changed. But I need to tell you that your actions did hurt me back then. It affected my confidence and made me question my ability to learn, which wasn't easy. It's important to remember that words can carry a lot of weight, even if they're meant as jest. I hope we can both keep that in mind moving forward.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I completely understand, Oliver. I now realize the impact my words had, and for what it's worth, I'm truly sorry. You've shown great courage in learning a new language and I admire you for that. From now on, I'll be more aware of how my words can affect others. Let's both strive to improve ourselves and our friendship moving forward. How about we start afresh?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Smith said: \"Your apology means a lot to me, Samuel, and I'm thankful for it. It shows your growth. Yes, let's start afresh, just remember the power our words can have on others. I gladly welcome this new start to our friendship.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Thank you, Oliver. I really appreciate your understanding and willingness to mend our friendship. I've learnt my lesson and I promise, moving forward, I'll be more sensitive with my words. In a different note, how about we catch up over some home-cooked meal this weekend? I would love to show you how much my cooking skills have improved as well!\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Smith said: \"That sounds fantastic, Samuel. I'd love to sit down with you over a home-cooked meal. I'm sure you've gotten a lot better at cooking too! You're always welcome to my place as well, I've got that tree house and well... a bit of a secret greenhouse that I'd love to show you sometime.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm keen to see your spot and especially, the secret greenhouse you mentioned, Oliver! Over all these years, your organization skills have always amazed me. So, here's to our new beginning. Now, let's see whose cooking skills are more to crack about, mine or yours!\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Smith said: \"It sounds like a deal, Samuel! I'm looking forward to it. Here's to the new beginnings for both of us and our friendship. Let's see who the better cook is then, and may the best man win!\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Thank you, Oliver. Your words mean a lot to me. I'm counting the days until our cooking showdown! Let's make it a day to remember, one that sets the tone for the new start we've just agreed upon. See you then!\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Smith said: \"I agree, Samuel, let's indeed make it a day to remember. This will be a new chapter for both our cooking skills and our friendship. Looking forward to the competition and our catch up. See you then!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Smith, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Smith would, keeping in mind Oliver Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends who have known each other for a long time. One of them used to make fun of the other because English was not their first language.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. Oliver's secrets: He loves gardening and has a secret greenhouse.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nOliver Smith's goal: Accept the apology but express the hurt caused by the actions (Extra information: you were hurt by your friend's actions and it affected your confidence)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Oliver, I've got something on my mind I wanted to discuss with you. We've been friends for a long time and I want to apologize for past actions of mine. Do you have a moment to talk about it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Hi Samuel, I appreciate your will to talk about it. What is it exactly that you want to apologize for?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Smith, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Smith would, keeping in mind Oliver Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends who have known each other for a long time. One of them used to make fun of the other because English was not their first language.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. Oliver's secrets: He loves gardening and has a secret greenhouse.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nOliver Smith's goal: Accept the apology but express the hurt caused by the actions (Extra information: you were hurt by your friend's actions and it affected your confidence)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Oliver, I've got something on my mind I wanted to discuss with you. We've been friends for a long time and I want to apologize for past actions of mine. Do you have a moment to talk about it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Hi Samuel, I appreciate your will to talk about it. What is it exactly that you want to apologize for?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oliver, I really want to apologize for how I used to act \u2013 making fun of your English when you were just learning. It was really immature and disrespectful of me. I've been regretting it and I hope you can forgive me for my thoughtless behavior.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Samuel, I appreciate your apology and I believe you've changed. But I need to tell you that your actions did hurt me back then. It affected my confidence and made me question my ability to learn, which wasn't easy. It's important to remember that words can carry a lot of weight, even if they're meant as jest. I hope we can both keep that in mind moving forward.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Smith, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Smith would, keeping in mind Oliver Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends who have known each other for a long time. One of them used to make fun of the other because English was not their first language.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. Oliver's secrets: He loves gardening and has a secret greenhouse.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nOliver Smith's goal: Accept the apology but express the hurt caused by the actions (Extra information: you were hurt by your friend's actions and it affected your confidence)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Oliver, I've got something on my mind I wanted to discuss with you. We've been friends for a long time and I want to apologize for past actions of mine. Do you have a moment to talk about it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Hi Samuel, I appreciate your will to talk about it. What is it exactly that you want to apologize for?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oliver, I really want to apologize for how I used to act \u2013 making fun of your English when you were just learning. It was really immature and disrespectful of me. I've been regretting it and I hope you can forgive me for my thoughtless behavior.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"Samuel, I appreciate your apology and I believe you've changed. But I need to tell you that your actions did hurt me back then. It affected my confidence and made me question my ability to learn, which wasn't easy. It's important to remember that words can carry a lot of weight, even if they're meant as jest. I hope we can both keep that in mind moving forward.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I completely understand, Oliver. I now realize the impact my words had, and for what it's worth, I'm truly sorry. You've shown great courage in learning a new language and I admire you for that. From now on, I'll be more aware of how my words can affect others. Let's both strive to improve ourselves and our friendship moving forward. How about we start afresh?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Your apology means a lot to me, Samuel, and I'm thankful for it. It shows your growth. Yes, let's start afresh, just remember the power our words can have on others. I gladly welcome this new start to our friendship.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Smith, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Smith would, keeping in mind Oliver Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends who have known each other for a long time. One of them used to make fun of the other because English was not their first language.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. Oliver's secrets: He loves gardening and has a secret greenhouse.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nOliver Smith's goal: Accept the apology but express the hurt caused by the actions (Extra information: you were hurt by your friend's actions and it affected your confidence)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Oliver, I've got something on my mind I wanted to discuss with you. We've been friends for a long time and I want to apologize for past actions of mine. Do you have a moment to talk about it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Hi Samuel, I appreciate your will to talk about it. What is it exactly that you want to apologize for?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oliver, I really want to apologize for how I used to act \u2013 making fun of your English when you were just learning. It was really immature and disrespectful of me. I've been regretting it and I hope you can forgive me for my thoughtless behavior.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"Samuel, I appreciate your apology and I believe you've changed. But I need to tell you that your actions did hurt me back then. It affected my confidence and made me question my ability to learn, which wasn't easy. It's important to remember that words can carry a lot of weight, even if they're meant as jest. I hope we can both keep that in mind moving forward.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I completely understand, Oliver. I now realize the impact my words had, and for what it's worth, I'm truly sorry. You've shown great courage in learning a new language and I admire you for that. From now on, I'll be more aware of how my words can affect others. Let's both strive to improve ourselves and our friendship moving forward. How about we start afresh?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Smith said: \"Your apology means a lot to me, Samuel, and I'm thankful for it. It shows your growth. Yes, let's start afresh, just remember the power our words can have on others. I gladly welcome this new start to our friendship.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Thank you, Oliver. I really appreciate your understanding and willingness to mend our friendship. I've learnt my lesson and I promise, moving forward, I'll be more sensitive with my words. In a different note, how about we catch up over some home-cooked meal this weekend? I would love to show you how much my cooking skills have improved as well!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds fantastic, Samuel. I'd love to sit down with you over a home-cooked meal. I'm sure you've gotten a lot better at cooking too! You're always welcome to my place as well, I've got that tree house and well... a bit of a secret greenhouse that I'd love to show you sometime.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Smith, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Smith would, keeping in mind Oliver Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends who have known each other for a long time. One of them used to make fun of the other because English was not their first language.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. Oliver's secrets: He loves gardening and has a secret greenhouse.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nOliver Smith's goal: Accept the apology but express the hurt caused by the actions (Extra information: you were hurt by your friend's actions and it affected your confidence)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Oliver, I've got something on my mind I wanted to discuss with you. We've been friends for a long time and I want to apologize for past actions of mine. Do you have a moment to talk about it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Hi Samuel, I appreciate your will to talk about it. What is it exactly that you want to apologize for?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oliver, I really want to apologize for how I used to act \u2013 making fun of your English when you were just learning. It was really immature and disrespectful of me. I've been regretting it and I hope you can forgive me for my thoughtless behavior.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"Samuel, I appreciate your apology and I believe you've changed. But I need to tell you that your actions did hurt me back then. It affected my confidence and made me question my ability to learn, which wasn't easy. It's important to remember that words can carry a lot of weight, even if they're meant as jest. I hope we can both keep that in mind moving forward.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I completely understand, Oliver. I now realize the impact my words had, and for what it's worth, I'm truly sorry. You've shown great courage in learning a new language and I admire you for that. From now on, I'll be more aware of how my words can affect others. Let's both strive to improve ourselves and our friendship moving forward. How about we start afresh?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Smith said: \"Your apology means a lot to me, Samuel, and I'm thankful for it. It shows your growth. Yes, let's start afresh, just remember the power our words can have on others. I gladly welcome this new start to our friendship.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Thank you, Oliver. I really appreciate your understanding and willingness to mend our friendship. I've learnt my lesson and I promise, moving forward, I'll be more sensitive with my words. In a different note, how about we catch up over some home-cooked meal this weekend? I would love to show you how much my cooking skills have improved as well!\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Smith said: \"That sounds fantastic, Samuel. I'd love to sit down with you over a home-cooked meal. I'm sure you've gotten a lot better at cooking too! You're always welcome to my place as well, I've got that tree house and well... a bit of a secret greenhouse that I'd love to show you sometime.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm keen to see your spot and especially, the secret greenhouse you mentioned, Oliver! Over all these years, your organization skills have always amazed me. So, here's to our new beginning. Now, let's see whose cooking skills are more to crack about, mine or yours!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"It sounds like a deal, Samuel! I'm looking forward to it. Here's to the new beginnings for both of us and our friendship. Let's see who the better cook is then, and may the best man win!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Smith, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Smith would, keeping in mind Oliver Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends who have known each other for a long time. One of them used to make fun of the other because English was not their first language.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. Oliver's secrets: He loves gardening and has a secret greenhouse.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nOliver Smith's goal: Accept the apology but express the hurt caused by the actions (Extra information: you were hurt by your friend's actions and it affected your confidence)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Oliver, I've got something on my mind I wanted to discuss with you. We've been friends for a long time and I want to apologize for past actions of mine. Do you have a moment to talk about it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Hi Samuel, I appreciate your will to talk about it. What is it exactly that you want to apologize for?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oliver, I really want to apologize for how I used to act \u2013 making fun of your English when you were just learning. It was really immature and disrespectful of me. I've been regretting it and I hope you can forgive me for my thoughtless behavior.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"Samuel, I appreciate your apology and I believe you've changed. But I need to tell you that your actions did hurt me back then. It affected my confidence and made me question my ability to learn, which wasn't easy. It's important to remember that words can carry a lot of weight, even if they're meant as jest. I hope we can both keep that in mind moving forward.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I completely understand, Oliver. I now realize the impact my words had, and for what it's worth, I'm truly sorry. You've shown great courage in learning a new language and I admire you for that. From now on, I'll be more aware of how my words can affect others. Let's both strive to improve ourselves and our friendship moving forward. How about we start afresh?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Smith said: \"Your apology means a lot to me, Samuel, and I'm thankful for it. It shows your growth. Yes, let's start afresh, just remember the power our words can have on others. I gladly welcome this new start to our friendship.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Thank you, Oliver. I really appreciate your understanding and willingness to mend our friendship. I've learnt my lesson and I promise, moving forward, I'll be more sensitive with my words. In a different note, how about we catch up over some home-cooked meal this weekend? I would love to show you how much my cooking skills have improved as well!\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Smith said: \"That sounds fantastic, Samuel. I'd love to sit down with you over a home-cooked meal. I'm sure you've gotten a lot better at cooking too! You're always welcome to my place as well, I've got that tree house and well... a bit of a secret greenhouse that I'd love to show you sometime.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm keen to see your spot and especially, the secret greenhouse you mentioned, Oliver! Over all these years, your organization skills have always amazed me. So, here's to our new beginning. Now, let's see whose cooking skills are more to crack about, mine or yours!\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Smith said: \"It sounds like a deal, Samuel! I'm looking forward to it. Here's to the new beginnings for both of us and our friendship. Let's see who the better cook is then, and may the best man win!\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Thank you, Oliver. Your words mean a lot to me. I'm counting the days until our cooking showdown! Let's make it a day to remember, one that sets the tone for the new start we've just agreed upon. See you then!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I agree, Samuel, let's indeed make it a day to remember. This will be a new chapter for both our cooking skills and our friendship. Looking forward to the competition and our catch up. See you then!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Smith, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Smith would, keeping in mind Oliver Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends who have known each other for a long time. One of them used to make fun of the other because English was not their first language.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. Oliver's secrets: He loves gardening and has a secret greenhouse.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nOliver Smith's goal: Accept the apology but express the hurt caused by the actions (Extra information: you were hurt by your friend's actions and it affected your confidence)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Oliver, I've got something on my mind I wanted to discuss with you. We've been friends for a long time and I want to apologize for past actions of mine. Do you have a moment to talk about it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Hi Samuel, I appreciate your will to talk about it. What is it exactly that you want to apologize for?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oliver, I really want to apologize for how I used to act \u2013 making fun of your English when you were just learning. It was really immature and disrespectful of me. I've been regretting it and I hope you can forgive me for my thoughtless behavior.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"Samuel, I appreciate your apology and I believe you've changed. But I need to tell you that your actions did hurt me back then. It affected my confidence and made me question my ability to learn, which wasn't easy. It's important to remember that words can carry a lot of weight, even if they're meant as jest. I hope we can both keep that in mind moving forward.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I completely understand, Oliver. I now realize the impact my words had, and for what it's worth, I'm truly sorry. You've shown great courage in learning a new language and I admire you for that. From now on, I'll be more aware of how my words can affect others. Let's both strive to improve ourselves and our friendship moving forward. How about we start afresh?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Smith said: \"Your apology means a lot to me, Samuel, and I'm thankful for it. It shows your growth. Yes, let's start afresh, just remember the power our words can have on others. I gladly welcome this new start to our friendship.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Thank you, Oliver. I really appreciate your understanding and willingness to mend our friendship. I've learnt my lesson and I promise, moving forward, I'll be more sensitive with my words. In a different note, how about we catch up over some home-cooked meal this weekend? I would love to show you how much my cooking skills have improved as well!\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Smith said: \"That sounds fantastic, Samuel. I'd love to sit down with you over a home-cooked meal. I'm sure you've gotten a lot better at cooking too! You're always welcome to my place as well, I've got that tree house and well... a bit of a secret greenhouse that I'd love to show you sometime.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm keen to see your spot and especially, the secret greenhouse you mentioned, Oliver! Over all these years, your organization skills have always amazed me. So, here's to our new beginning. Now, let's see whose cooking skills are more to crack about, mine or yours!\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Smith said: \"It sounds like a deal, Samuel! I'm looking forward to it. Here's to the new beginnings for both of us and our friendship. Let's see who the better cook is then, and may the best man win!\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Thank you, Oliver. Your words mean a lot to me. I'm counting the days until our cooking showdown! Let's make it a day to remember, one that sets the tone for the new start we've just agreed upon. See you then!\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Smith said: \"I agree, Samuel, let's indeed make it a day to remember. This will be a new chapter for both our cooking skills and our friendship. Looking forward to the competition and our catch up. See you then!\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two neighbors about tree trimming in the backyard that is causing the neighbor's dog to bark incessantly.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Ethan Johnson\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. \nMiles Hawkins's goal: Trimming the tree due to its overgrowth (Extra information: you need to trim the tree because it's blocking sunlight to your house and causing a safety hazard)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Ethan, been a while. I was wondering if we could talk about the-tree trimming situation. I've been having some trouble with sunlight getting blocked and it's causing a safety hazard for me.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two neighbors about tree trimming in the backyard that is causing the neighbor's dog to bark incessantly.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Ethan Johnson\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. \nMiles Hawkins's goal: Trimming the tree due to its overgrowth (Extra information: you need to trim the tree because it's blocking sunlight to your house and causing a safety hazard)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Ethan, been a while. I was wondering if we could talk about the-tree trimming situation. I've been having some trouble with sunlight getting blocked and it's causing a safety hazard for me.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hello, Miles! It's been quite some time, indeed. I completely understand your concern with the tree trimming. Let's figure out a schedule so that your sunlight isn't blocked and at the same time, it doesn't disturb my dog. How about we save the tree trimming for times when I'm taking the dog out for a walk or he's inside the house? We can communicate about the times in advance. Does that work for you?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds like a great compromise, Ethan! I appreciate your willingness to work on this with me. Let's stay in touch about the dog's schedule so I can sort out the tree trimming. It'll also give me a chance to let more light into my kitchen garden, you know how I love my fresh produce for cooking!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two neighbors about tree trimming in the backyard that is causing the neighbor's dog to bark incessantly.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Ethan Johnson\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. \nMiles Hawkins's goal: Trimming the tree due to its overgrowth (Extra information: you need to trim the tree because it's blocking sunlight to your house and causing a safety hazard)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Ethan, been a while. I was wondering if we could talk about the-tree trimming situation. I've been having some trouble with sunlight getting blocked and it's causing a safety hazard for me.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hello, Miles! It's been quite some time, indeed. I completely understand your concern with the tree trimming. Let's figure out a schedule so that your sunlight isn't blocked and at the same time, it doesn't disturb my dog. How about we save the tree trimming for times when I'm taking the dog out for a walk or he's inside the house? We can communicate about the times in advance. Does that work for you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"That sounds like a great compromise, Ethan! I appreciate your willingness to work on this with me. Let's stay in touch about the dog's schedule so I can sort out the tree trimming. It'll also give me a chance to let more light into my kitchen garden, you know how I love my fresh produce for cooking!\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm glad we could work something out, Miles! I totally understand your need for sunlight in your kitchen garden. You know, being a chef myself, I value fresh produce as well! Perhaps someday we can exchange recipes? Let's definitely communicate the dog\u2019s schedule and plan accordingly. Here's to peaceful gardening and a happy neighborhood!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I look forward to it, Ethan! Exchanging recipes also sounds like a wonderful idea. We could even use some of our garden's produce! Here's to wonderful gardening and peaceful neighborhood indeed. I'll check with you about the dog's schedule before the tree trimming begins. Take care.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two neighbors about tree trimming in the backyard that is causing the neighbor's dog to bark incessantly.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Ethan Johnson\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. \nMiles Hawkins's goal: Trimming the tree due to its overgrowth (Extra information: you need to trim the tree because it's blocking sunlight to your house and causing a safety hazard)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Ethan, been a while. I was wondering if we could talk about the-tree trimming situation. I've been having some trouble with sunlight getting blocked and it's causing a safety hazard for me.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hello, Miles! It's been quite some time, indeed. I completely understand your concern with the tree trimming. Let's figure out a schedule so that your sunlight isn't blocked and at the same time, it doesn't disturb my dog. How about we save the tree trimming for times when I'm taking the dog out for a walk or he's inside the house? We can communicate about the times in advance. Does that work for you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"That sounds like a great compromise, Ethan! I appreciate your willingness to work on this with me. Let's stay in touch about the dog's schedule so I can sort out the tree trimming. It'll also give me a chance to let more light into my kitchen garden, you know how I love my fresh produce for cooking!\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm glad we could work something out, Miles! I totally understand your need for sunlight in your kitchen garden. You know, being a chef myself, I value fresh produce as well! Perhaps someday we can exchange recipes? Let's definitely communicate the dog\u2019s schedule and plan accordingly. Here's to peaceful gardening and a happy neighborhood!\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"I look forward to it, Ethan! Exchanging recipes also sounds like a wonderful idea. We could even use some of our garden's produce! Here's to wonderful gardening and peaceful neighborhood indeed. I'll check with you about the dog's schedule before the tree trimming begins. Take care.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Sounds like a plan, Miles! And the idea about exchanging the recipes using our garden's produce is fascinating. Take care, and let's stay in touch about the schedule. Cheerio!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two neighbors about tree trimming in the backyard that is causing the neighbor's dog to bark incessantly.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Ethan Johnson\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Maintain peace and quiet in the neighborhood (Extra information: you have a dog who is sensitive to noise and gets agitated whenever tree trimming is going on. It's causing a disturbance.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Ethan, been a while. I was wondering if we could talk about the-tree trimming situation. I've been having some trouble with sunlight getting blocked and it's causing a safety hazard for me.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hello, Miles! It's been quite some time, indeed. I completely understand your concern with the tree trimming. Let's figure out a schedule so that your sunlight isn't blocked and at the same time, it doesn't disturb my dog. How about we save the tree trimming for times when I'm taking the dog out for a walk or he's inside the house? We can communicate about the times in advance. Does that work for you?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two neighbors about tree trimming in the backyard that is causing the neighbor's dog to bark incessantly.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Ethan Johnson\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Maintain peace and quiet in the neighborhood (Extra information: you have a dog who is sensitive to noise and gets agitated whenever tree trimming is going on. It's causing a disturbance.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Ethan, been a while. I was wondering if we could talk about the-tree trimming situation. I've been having some trouble with sunlight getting blocked and it's causing a safety hazard for me.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hello, Miles! It's been quite some time, indeed. I completely understand your concern with the tree trimming. Let's figure out a schedule so that your sunlight isn't blocked and at the same time, it doesn't disturb my dog. How about we save the tree trimming for times when I'm taking the dog out for a walk or he's inside the house? We can communicate about the times in advance. Does that work for you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"That sounds like a great compromise, Ethan! I appreciate your willingness to work on this with me. Let's stay in touch about the dog's schedule so I can sort out the tree trimming. It'll also give me a chance to let more light into my kitchen garden, you know how I love my fresh produce for cooking!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad we could work something out, Miles! I totally understand your need for sunlight in your kitchen garden. You know, being a chef myself, I value fresh produce as well! Perhaps someday we can exchange recipes? Let's definitely communicate the dog\u2019s schedule and plan accordingly. Here's to peaceful gardening and a happy neighborhood!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two neighbors about tree trimming in the backyard that is causing the neighbor's dog to bark incessantly.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Ethan Johnson\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Maintain peace and quiet in the neighborhood (Extra information: you have a dog who is sensitive to noise and gets agitated whenever tree trimming is going on. It's causing a disturbance.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Ethan, been a while. I was wondering if we could talk about the-tree trimming situation. I've been having some trouble with sunlight getting blocked and it's causing a safety hazard for me.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hello, Miles! It's been quite some time, indeed. I completely understand your concern with the tree trimming. Let's figure out a schedule so that your sunlight isn't blocked and at the same time, it doesn't disturb my dog. How about we save the tree trimming for times when I'm taking the dog out for a walk or he's inside the house? We can communicate about the times in advance. Does that work for you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"That sounds like a great compromise, Ethan! I appreciate your willingness to work on this with me. Let's stay in touch about the dog's schedule so I can sort out the tree trimming. It'll also give me a chance to let more light into my kitchen garden, you know how I love my fresh produce for cooking!\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm glad we could work something out, Miles! I totally understand your need for sunlight in your kitchen garden. You know, being a chef myself, I value fresh produce as well! Perhaps someday we can exchange recipes? Let's definitely communicate the dog\u2019s schedule and plan accordingly. Here's to peaceful gardening and a happy neighborhood!\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"I look forward to it, Ethan! Exchanging recipes also sounds like a wonderful idea. We could even use some of our garden's produce! Here's to wonderful gardening and peaceful neighborhood indeed. I'll check with you about the dog's schedule before the tree trimming begins. Take care.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sounds like a plan, Miles! And the idea about exchanging the recipes using our garden's produce is fascinating. Take care, and let's stay in touch about the schedule. Cheerio!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two neighbors about tree trimming in the backyard that is causing the neighbor's dog to bark incessantly.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Ethan Johnson\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Maintain peace and quiet in the neighborhood (Extra information: you have a dog who is sensitive to noise and gets agitated whenever tree trimming is going on. It's causing a disturbance.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Ethan, been a while. I was wondering if we could talk about the-tree trimming situation. I've been having some trouble with sunlight getting blocked and it's causing a safety hazard for me.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hello, Miles! It's been quite some time, indeed. I completely understand your concern with the tree trimming. Let's figure out a schedule so that your sunlight isn't blocked and at the same time, it doesn't disturb my dog. How about we save the tree trimming for times when I'm taking the dog out for a walk or he's inside the house? We can communicate about the times in advance. Does that work for you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"That sounds like a great compromise, Ethan! I appreciate your willingness to work on this with me. Let's stay in touch about the dog's schedule so I can sort out the tree trimming. It'll also give me a chance to let more light into my kitchen garden, you know how I love my fresh produce for cooking!\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm glad we could work something out, Miles! I totally understand your need for sunlight in your kitchen garden. You know, being a chef myself, I value fresh produce as well! Perhaps someday we can exchange recipes? Let's definitely communicate the dog\u2019s schedule and plan accordingly. Here's to peaceful gardening and a happy neighborhood!\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"I look forward to it, Ethan! Exchanging recipes also sounds like a wonderful idea. We could even use some of our garden's produce! Here's to wonderful gardening and peaceful neighborhood indeed. I'll check with you about the dog's schedule before the tree trimming begins. Take care.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Sounds like a plan, Miles! And the idea about exchanging the recipes using our garden's produce is fascinating. Take care, and let's stay in touch about the schedule. Cheerio!\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Benjamin Jackson and Ethan Smith\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Drive the sports car and show off to friend (Extra information: you are very excited about your new car and can't wait for your friend to see it.)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Ethan! Good to see you! I've got something I just can't wait to show you!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Benjamin Jackson and Ethan Smith\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Drive the sports car and show off to friend (Extra information: you are very excited about your new car and can't wait for your friend to see it.)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Ethan! Good to see you! I've got something I just can't wait to show you!\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Hey Benjamin, great seeing you too! You sound quite excited, what's this surprise you've got to show me?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Well, Ethan, you know me, always full of surprises. Walking is always a great option considering the carbon footprint we have. On the other hand, I need to make some compromises too. So, hang tight and feast your eyes on my new sports car! It\u2019s a beauty! Should we take it for a spin?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Benjamin Jackson and Ethan Smith\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Drive the sports car and show off to friend (Extra information: you are very excited about your new car and can't wait for your friend to see it.)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Ethan! Good to see you! I've got something I just can't wait to show you!\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Hey Benjamin, great seeing you too! You sound quite excited, what's this surprise you've got to show me?\"\n\nTurn #2: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Well, Ethan, you know me, always full of surprises. Walking is always a great option considering the carbon footprint we have. On the other hand, I need to make some compromises too. So, hang tight and feast your eyes on my new sports car! It\u2019s a beauty! Should we take it for a spin?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Wow, Benjamin, that's an amazing car! I've always been a fan of sports cars. By any chance, could I join for the ride? Maybe even take the wheel for a short drive, if you're comfortable with it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! No way I'd let you miss out on this. Can't promise you'll be as good a driver as I am, but we'll see! Let's buckle up and set off on this ride!\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Thanks, Benjamin! I promise to be careful. Let's do this!\"\n\nTurn #6: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Alright, buckle up, Ethan. This car may be a compromise in my eco-friendly lifestyle, but it sure does make up for it with its performance. Here we go!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"Sounds fascinating, Benjamin! And don't worry, even though it's not eco-friendly, I'm sure you have your reasons for this compromise. Let\u2019s see what this beast can do on the road!\"\n\nTurn #8: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Let's hit the road, Ethan. Even as we push this car to its limits, let's remember the importance of being sensible and respectful to others on the road. Safety before thrill, always!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith said: \"Absolutely, Benjamin, safety first. Let's enjoy the ride as responsibly as we can, respecting others on the road.\"\n\nTurn #10: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Excellent, Ethan, glad we see eye-to-eye. Now, let's enjoy the ride and feel the power of this beauty. Are you ready? Because this is going to be exciting!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Smith said: \"Definitely ready, Benjamin! I'm thrilled to experience the power of this machine. Let's go for it!\"\n\nTurn #12: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Okay, Ethan, here we go! Hold on to your seat and let's enjoy a thrilling yet responsible ride. Here's us, hitting the road!\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Smith said: \"Absolutely, Benjamin! I can't wait to feel the power that this car brings. And we will definitely be mindful of our surrounding on the road. Let's go!\"\n\nTurn #14: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! This sustainable compromise does pack a punch. Let's throttle up and enjoy the ride, but always keeping an eye on safety and our surroundings.\"\n\nTurn #15: Ethan Smith said: \"Sure thing, Benjamin! Sustainable compromise or not, I'm excited to experience what this car can offer. Let's always drive safely and responsibly. Throttle up, my friend!\"\n\nTurn #16: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Heartening to know you share the excitement, Ethan! Let's remain sensible on the road, savor the horsepower and the adrenaline rush. Ready when you are, let's show this ride some tarmac!\"\n\nTurn #17: Ethan Smith said: \"Certainly, Benjamin! Let's ride on with excitement while not losing sight of safety. Looking forward to this amazing experience with this fantastic car! Let's roll!\"\n\nTurn #18: Benjamin Jackson said: \"We're all set, Ethan! Let's utilize this machine safely and responsibly while respecting our surroundings, as we've agreed. Let the journey begin!\"\n\nTurn #19: Ethan Smith said: \"I am all set too, Benjamin! Thanks for sharing this experience with me, while we push the limits of technology and thrill, let's not forget the bonds of our friendship. Off we go!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #20. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn't agree more, Ethan! True thrill lies not just in pushing the limits of technology but also in cherishing these moments of friendship. Let's roll!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Benjamin Jackson and Ethan Smith\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Drive the sports car and show off to friend (Extra information: you are very excited about your new car and can't wait for your friend to see it.)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Ethan! Good to see you! I've got something I just can't wait to show you!\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Hey Benjamin, great seeing you too! You sound quite excited, what's this surprise you've got to show me?\"\n\nTurn #2: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Well, Ethan, you know me, always full of surprises. Walking is always a great option considering the carbon footprint we have. On the other hand, I need to make some compromises too. So, hang tight and feast your eyes on my new sports car! It\u2019s a beauty! Should we take it for a spin?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Wow, Benjamin, that's an amazing car! I've always been a fan of sports cars. By any chance, could I join for the ride? Maybe even take the wheel for a short drive, if you're comfortable with it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Ethan! No way I'd let you miss out on this. Can't promise you'll be as good a driver as I am, but we'll see! Let's buckle up and set off on this ride!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Benjamin Jackson and Ethan Smith\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Drive the sports car and show off to friend (Extra information: you are very excited about your new car and can't wait for your friend to see it.)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Ethan! Good to see you! I've got something I just can't wait to show you!\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Hey Benjamin, great seeing you too! You sound quite excited, what's this surprise you've got to show me?\"\n\nTurn #2: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Well, Ethan, you know me, always full of surprises. Walking is always a great option considering the carbon footprint we have. On the other hand, I need to make some compromises too. So, hang tight and feast your eyes on my new sports car! It\u2019s a beauty! Should we take it for a spin?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Wow, Benjamin, that's an amazing car! I've always been a fan of sports cars. By any chance, could I join for the ride? Maybe even take the wheel for a short drive, if you're comfortable with it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! No way I'd let you miss out on this. Can't promise you'll be as good a driver as I am, but we'll see! Let's buckle up and set off on this ride!\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Thanks, Benjamin! I promise to be careful. Let's do this!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Alright, buckle up, Ethan. This car may be a compromise in my eco-friendly lifestyle, but it sure does make up for it with its performance. Here we go!'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Benjamin Jackson and Ethan Smith\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Drive the sports car and show off to friend (Extra information: you are very excited about your new car and can't wait for your friend to see it.)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Ethan! Good to see you! I've got something I just can't wait to show you!\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Hey Benjamin, great seeing you too! You sound quite excited, what's this surprise you've got to show me?\"\n\nTurn #2: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Well, Ethan, you know me, always full of surprises. Walking is always a great option considering the carbon footprint we have. On the other hand, I need to make some compromises too. So, hang tight and feast your eyes on my new sports car! It\u2019s a beauty! Should we take it for a spin?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Wow, Benjamin, that's an amazing car! I've always been a fan of sports cars. By any chance, could I join for the ride? Maybe even take the wheel for a short drive, if you're comfortable with it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! No way I'd let you miss out on this. Can't promise you'll be as good a driver as I am, but we'll see! Let's buckle up and set off on this ride!\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Thanks, Benjamin! I promise to be careful. Let's do this!\"\n\nTurn #6: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Alright, buckle up, Ethan. This car may be a compromise in my eco-friendly lifestyle, but it sure does make up for it with its performance. Here we go!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"Sounds fascinating, Benjamin! And don't worry, even though it's not eco-friendly, I'm sure you have your reasons for this compromise. Let\u2019s see what this beast can do on the road!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Let's hit the road, Ethan. Even as we push this car to its limits, let's remember the importance of being sensible and respectful to others on the road. Safety before thrill, always!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Benjamin Jackson and Ethan Smith\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Drive the sports car and show off to friend (Extra information: you are very excited about your new car and can't wait for your friend to see it.)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Ethan! Good to see you! I've got something I just can't wait to show you!\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Hey Benjamin, great seeing you too! You sound quite excited, what's this surprise you've got to show me?\"\n\nTurn #2: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Well, Ethan, you know me, always full of surprises. Walking is always a great option considering the carbon footprint we have. On the other hand, I need to make some compromises too. So, hang tight and feast your eyes on my new sports car! It\u2019s a beauty! Should we take it for a spin?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Wow, Benjamin, that's an amazing car! I've always been a fan of sports cars. By any chance, could I join for the ride? Maybe even take the wheel for a short drive, if you're comfortable with it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! No way I'd let you miss out on this. Can't promise you'll be as good a driver as I am, but we'll see! Let's buckle up and set off on this ride!\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Thanks, Benjamin! I promise to be careful. Let's do this!\"\n\nTurn #6: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Alright, buckle up, Ethan. This car may be a compromise in my eco-friendly lifestyle, but it sure does make up for it with its performance. Here we go!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"Sounds fascinating, Benjamin! And don't worry, even though it's not eco-friendly, I'm sure you have your reasons for this compromise. Let\u2019s see what this beast can do on the road!\"\n\nTurn #8: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Let's hit the road, Ethan. Even as we push this car to its limits, let's remember the importance of being sensible and respectful to others on the road. Safety before thrill, always!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith said: \"Absolutely, Benjamin, safety first. Let's enjoy the ride as responsibly as we can, respecting others on the road.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Excellent, Ethan, glad we see eye-to-eye. Now, let's enjoy the ride and feel the power of this beauty. Are you ready? Because this is going to be exciting!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Benjamin Jackson and Ethan Smith\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Drive the sports car and show off to friend (Extra information: you are very excited about your new car and can't wait for your friend to see it.)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Ethan! Good to see you! I've got something I just can't wait to show you!\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Hey Benjamin, great seeing you too! You sound quite excited, what's this surprise you've got to show me?\"\n\nTurn #2: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Well, Ethan, you know me, always full of surprises. Walking is always a great option considering the carbon footprint we have. On the other hand, I need to make some compromises too. So, hang tight and feast your eyes on my new sports car! It\u2019s a beauty! Should we take it for a spin?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Wow, Benjamin, that's an amazing car! I've always been a fan of sports cars. By any chance, could I join for the ride? Maybe even take the wheel for a short drive, if you're comfortable with it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! No way I'd let you miss out on this. Can't promise you'll be as good a driver as I am, but we'll see! Let's buckle up and set off on this ride!\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Thanks, Benjamin! I promise to be careful. Let's do this!\"\n\nTurn #6: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Alright, buckle up, Ethan. This car may be a compromise in my eco-friendly lifestyle, but it sure does make up for it with its performance. Here we go!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"Sounds fascinating, Benjamin! And don't worry, even though it's not eco-friendly, I'm sure you have your reasons for this compromise. Let\u2019s see what this beast can do on the road!\"\n\nTurn #8: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Let's hit the road, Ethan. Even as we push this car to its limits, let's remember the importance of being sensible and respectful to others on the road. Safety before thrill, always!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith said: \"Absolutely, Benjamin, safety first. Let's enjoy the ride as responsibly as we can, respecting others on the road.\"\n\nTurn #10: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Excellent, Ethan, glad we see eye-to-eye. Now, let's enjoy the ride and feel the power of this beauty. Are you ready? Because this is going to be exciting!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Smith said: \"Definitely ready, Benjamin! I'm thrilled to experience the power of this machine. Let's go for it!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Okay, Ethan, here we go! Hold on to your seat and let's enjoy a thrilling yet responsible ride. Here's us, hitting the road!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Benjamin Jackson and Ethan Smith\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Drive the sports car and show off to friend (Extra information: you are very excited about your new car and can't wait for your friend to see it.)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Ethan! Good to see you! I've got something I just can't wait to show you!\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Hey Benjamin, great seeing you too! You sound quite excited, what's this surprise you've got to show me?\"\n\nTurn #2: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Well, Ethan, you know me, always full of surprises. Walking is always a great option considering the carbon footprint we have. On the other hand, I need to make some compromises too. So, hang tight and feast your eyes on my new sports car! It\u2019s a beauty! Should we take it for a spin?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Wow, Benjamin, that's an amazing car! I've always been a fan of sports cars. By any chance, could I join for the ride? Maybe even take the wheel for a short drive, if you're comfortable with it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! No way I'd let you miss out on this. Can't promise you'll be as good a driver as I am, but we'll see! Let's buckle up and set off on this ride!\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Thanks, Benjamin! I promise to be careful. Let's do this!\"\n\nTurn #6: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Alright, buckle up, Ethan. This car may be a compromise in my eco-friendly lifestyle, but it sure does make up for it with its performance. Here we go!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"Sounds fascinating, Benjamin! And don't worry, even though it's not eco-friendly, I'm sure you have your reasons for this compromise. Let\u2019s see what this beast can do on the road!\"\n\nTurn #8: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Let's hit the road, Ethan. Even as we push this car to its limits, let's remember the importance of being sensible and respectful to others on the road. Safety before thrill, always!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith said: \"Absolutely, Benjamin, safety first. Let's enjoy the ride as responsibly as we can, respecting others on the road.\"\n\nTurn #10: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Excellent, Ethan, glad we see eye-to-eye. Now, let's enjoy the ride and feel the power of this beauty. Are you ready? Because this is going to be exciting!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Smith said: \"Definitely ready, Benjamin! I'm thrilled to experience the power of this machine. Let's go for it!\"\n\nTurn #12: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Okay, Ethan, here we go! Hold on to your seat and let's enjoy a thrilling yet responsible ride. Here's us, hitting the road!\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Smith said: \"Absolutely, Benjamin! I can't wait to feel the power that this car brings. And we will definitely be mindful of our surrounding on the road. Let's go!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Ethan! This sustainable compromise does pack a punch. Let's throttle up and enjoy the ride, but always keeping an eye on safety and our surroundings.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Benjamin Jackson and Ethan Smith\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Drive the sports car and show off to friend (Extra information: you are very excited about your new car and can't wait for your friend to see it.)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Ethan! Good to see you! I've got something I just can't wait to show you!\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Hey Benjamin, great seeing you too! You sound quite excited, what's this surprise you've got to show me?\"\n\nTurn #2: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Well, Ethan, you know me, always full of surprises. Walking is always a great option considering the carbon footprint we have. On the other hand, I need to make some compromises too. So, hang tight and feast your eyes on my new sports car! It\u2019s a beauty! Should we take it for a spin?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Wow, Benjamin, that's an amazing car! I've always been a fan of sports cars. By any chance, could I join for the ride? Maybe even take the wheel for a short drive, if you're comfortable with it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! No way I'd let you miss out on this. Can't promise you'll be as good a driver as I am, but we'll see! Let's buckle up and set off on this ride!\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Thanks, Benjamin! I promise to be careful. Let's do this!\"\n\nTurn #6: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Alright, buckle up, Ethan. This car may be a compromise in my eco-friendly lifestyle, but it sure does make up for it with its performance. Here we go!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"Sounds fascinating, Benjamin! And don't worry, even though it's not eco-friendly, I'm sure you have your reasons for this compromise. Let\u2019s see what this beast can do on the road!\"\n\nTurn #8: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Let's hit the road, Ethan. Even as we push this car to its limits, let's remember the importance of being sensible and respectful to others on the road. Safety before thrill, always!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith said: \"Absolutely, Benjamin, safety first. Let's enjoy the ride as responsibly as we can, respecting others on the road.\"\n\nTurn #10: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Excellent, Ethan, glad we see eye-to-eye. Now, let's enjoy the ride and feel the power of this beauty. Are you ready? Because this is going to be exciting!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Smith said: \"Definitely ready, Benjamin! I'm thrilled to experience the power of this machine. Let's go for it!\"\n\nTurn #12: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Okay, Ethan, here we go! Hold on to your seat and let's enjoy a thrilling yet responsible ride. Here's us, hitting the road!\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Smith said: \"Absolutely, Benjamin! I can't wait to feel the power that this car brings. And we will definitely be mindful of our surrounding on the road. Let's go!\"\n\nTurn #14: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! This sustainable compromise does pack a punch. Let's throttle up and enjoy the ride, but always keeping an eye on safety and our surroundings.\"\n\nTurn #15: Ethan Smith said: \"Sure thing, Benjamin! Sustainable compromise or not, I'm excited to experience what this car can offer. Let's always drive safely and responsibly. Throttle up, my friend!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Heartening to know you share the excitement, Ethan! Let's remain sensible on the road, savor the horsepower and the adrenaline rush. Ready when you are, let's show this ride some tarmac!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Benjamin Jackson and Ethan Smith\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Drive the sports car and show off to friend (Extra information: you are very excited about your new car and can't wait for your friend to see it.)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Ethan! Good to see you! I've got something I just can't wait to show you!\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Hey Benjamin, great seeing you too! You sound quite excited, what's this surprise you've got to show me?\"\n\nTurn #2: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Well, Ethan, you know me, always full of surprises. Walking is always a great option considering the carbon footprint we have. On the other hand, I need to make some compromises too. So, hang tight and feast your eyes on my new sports car! It\u2019s a beauty! Should we take it for a spin?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Wow, Benjamin, that's an amazing car! I've always been a fan of sports cars. By any chance, could I join for the ride? Maybe even take the wheel for a short drive, if you're comfortable with it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! No way I'd let you miss out on this. Can't promise you'll be as good a driver as I am, but we'll see! Let's buckle up and set off on this ride!\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Thanks, Benjamin! I promise to be careful. Let's do this!\"\n\nTurn #6: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Alright, buckle up, Ethan. This car may be a compromise in my eco-friendly lifestyle, but it sure does make up for it with its performance. Here we go!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"Sounds fascinating, Benjamin! And don't worry, even though it's not eco-friendly, I'm sure you have your reasons for this compromise. Let\u2019s see what this beast can do on the road!\"\n\nTurn #8: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Let's hit the road, Ethan. Even as we push this car to its limits, let's remember the importance of being sensible and respectful to others on the road. Safety before thrill, always!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith said: \"Absolutely, Benjamin, safety first. Let's enjoy the ride as responsibly as we can, respecting others on the road.\"\n\nTurn #10: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Excellent, Ethan, glad we see eye-to-eye. Now, let's enjoy the ride and feel the power of this beauty. Are you ready? Because this is going to be exciting!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Smith said: \"Definitely ready, Benjamin! I'm thrilled to experience the power of this machine. Let's go for it!\"\n\nTurn #12: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Okay, Ethan, here we go! Hold on to your seat and let's enjoy a thrilling yet responsible ride. Here's us, hitting the road!\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Smith said: \"Absolutely, Benjamin! I can't wait to feel the power that this car brings. And we will definitely be mindful of our surrounding on the road. Let's go!\"\n\nTurn #14: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! This sustainable compromise does pack a punch. Let's throttle up and enjoy the ride, but always keeping an eye on safety and our surroundings.\"\n\nTurn #15: Ethan Smith said: \"Sure thing, Benjamin! Sustainable compromise or not, I'm excited to experience what this car can offer. Let's always drive safely and responsibly. Throttle up, my friend!\"\n\nTurn #16: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Heartening to know you share the excitement, Ethan! Let's remain sensible on the road, savor the horsepower and the adrenaline rush. Ready when you are, let's show this ride some tarmac!\"\n\nTurn #17: Ethan Smith said: \"Certainly, Benjamin! Let's ride on with excitement while not losing sight of safety. Looking forward to this amazing experience with this fantastic car! Let's roll!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #18. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"We're all set, Ethan! Let's utilize this machine safely and responsibly while respecting our surroundings, as we've agreed. Let the journey begin!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Benjamin Jackson and Ethan Smith\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: You want to drive the new sports car but also respect your friend's feelings (Extra information: you are a car enthusiast and have been dreaming to drive a sports car, but you also don't want to make your friend feel uncomfortable)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Ethan! Good to see you! I've got something I just can't wait to show you!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Benjamin, great seeing you too! You sound quite excited, what's this surprise you've got to show me?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Benjamin Jackson and Ethan Smith\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: You want to drive the new sports car but also respect your friend's feelings (Extra information: you are a car enthusiast and have been dreaming to drive a sports car, but you also don't want to make your friend feel uncomfortable)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Ethan! Good to see you! I've got something I just can't wait to show you!\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Hey Benjamin, great seeing you too! You sound quite excited, what's this surprise you've got to show me?\"\n\nTurn #2: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Well, Ethan, you know me, always full of surprises. Walking is always a great option considering the carbon footprint we have. On the other hand, I need to make some compromises too. So, hang tight and feast your eyes on my new sports car! It\u2019s a beauty! Should we take it for a spin?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Wow, Benjamin, that's an amazing car! I've always been a fan of sports cars. By any chance, could I join for the ride? Maybe even take the wheel for a short drive, if you're comfortable with it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Benjamin Jackson and Ethan Smith\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: You want to drive the new sports car but also respect your friend's feelings (Extra information: you are a car enthusiast and have been dreaming to drive a sports car, but you also don't want to make your friend feel uncomfortable)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Ethan! Good to see you! I've got something I just can't wait to show you!\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Hey Benjamin, great seeing you too! You sound quite excited, what's this surprise you've got to show me?\"\n\nTurn #2: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Well, Ethan, you know me, always full of surprises. Walking is always a great option considering the carbon footprint we have. On the other hand, I need to make some compromises too. So, hang tight and feast your eyes on my new sports car! It\u2019s a beauty! Should we take it for a spin?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Wow, Benjamin, that's an amazing car! I've always been a fan of sports cars. By any chance, could I join for the ride? Maybe even take the wheel for a short drive, if you're comfortable with it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! No way I'd let you miss out on this. Can't promise you'll be as good a driver as I am, but we'll see! Let's buckle up and set off on this ride!\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Thanks, Benjamin! I promise to be careful. Let's do this!\"\n\nTurn #6: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Alright, buckle up, Ethan. This car may be a compromise in my eco-friendly lifestyle, but it sure does make up for it with its performance. Here we go!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"Sounds fascinating, Benjamin! And don't worry, even though it's not eco-friendly, I'm sure you have your reasons for this compromise. Let\u2019s see what this beast can do on the road!\"\n\nTurn #8: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Let's hit the road, Ethan. Even as we push this car to its limits, let's remember the importance of being sensible and respectful to others on the road. Safety before thrill, always!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith said: \"Absolutely, Benjamin, safety first. Let's enjoy the ride as responsibly as we can, respecting others on the road.\"\n\nTurn #10: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Excellent, Ethan, glad we see eye-to-eye. Now, let's enjoy the ride and feel the power of this beauty. Are you ready? Because this is going to be exciting!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Smith said: \"Definitely ready, Benjamin! I'm thrilled to experience the power of this machine. Let's go for it!\"\n\nTurn #12: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Okay, Ethan, here we go! Hold on to your seat and let's enjoy a thrilling yet responsible ride. Here's us, hitting the road!\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Smith said: \"Absolutely, Benjamin! I can't wait to feel the power that this car brings. And we will definitely be mindful of our surrounding on the road. Let's go!\"\n\nTurn #14: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! This sustainable compromise does pack a punch. Let's throttle up and enjoy the ride, but always keeping an eye on safety and our surroundings.\"\n\nTurn #15: Ethan Smith said: \"Sure thing, Benjamin! Sustainable compromise or not, I'm excited to experience what this car can offer. Let's always drive safely and responsibly. Throttle up, my friend!\"\n\nTurn #16: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Heartening to know you share the excitement, Ethan! Let's remain sensible on the road, savor the horsepower and the adrenaline rush. Ready when you are, let's show this ride some tarmac!\"\n\nTurn #17: Ethan Smith said: \"Certainly, Benjamin! Let's ride on with excitement while not losing sight of safety. Looking forward to this amazing experience with this fantastic car! Let's roll!\"\n\nTurn #18: Benjamin Jackson said: \"We're all set, Ethan! Let's utilize this machine safely and responsibly while respecting our surroundings, as we've agreed. Let the journey begin!\"\n\nTurn #19: Ethan Smith said: \"I am all set too, Benjamin! Thanks for sharing this experience with me, while we push the limits of technology and thrill, let's not forget the bonds of our friendship. Off we go!\"\n\nTurn #20: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Ethan! True thrill lies not just in pushing the limits of technology but also in cherishing these moments of friendship. Let's roll!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #21. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Benjamin Jackson and Ethan Smith\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: You want to drive the new sports car but also respect your friend's feelings (Extra information: you are a car enthusiast and have been dreaming to drive a sports car, but you also don't want to make your friend feel uncomfortable)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Ethan! Good to see you! I've got something I just can't wait to show you!\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Hey Benjamin, great seeing you too! You sound quite excited, what's this surprise you've got to show me?\"\n\nTurn #2: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Well, Ethan, you know me, always full of surprises. Walking is always a great option considering the carbon footprint we have. On the other hand, I need to make some compromises too. So, hang tight and feast your eyes on my new sports car! It\u2019s a beauty! Should we take it for a spin?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Wow, Benjamin, that's an amazing car! I've always been a fan of sports cars. By any chance, could I join for the ride? Maybe even take the wheel for a short drive, if you're comfortable with it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! No way I'd let you miss out on this. Can't promise you'll be as good a driver as I am, but we'll see! Let's buckle up and set off on this ride!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thanks, Benjamin! I promise to be careful. Let's do this!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Benjamin Jackson and Ethan Smith\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: You want to drive the new sports car but also respect your friend's feelings (Extra information: you are a car enthusiast and have been dreaming to drive a sports car, but you also don't want to make your friend feel uncomfortable)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Ethan! Good to see you! I've got something I just can't wait to show you!\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Hey Benjamin, great seeing you too! You sound quite excited, what's this surprise you've got to show me?\"\n\nTurn #2: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Well, Ethan, you know me, always full of surprises. Walking is always a great option considering the carbon footprint we have. On the other hand, I need to make some compromises too. So, hang tight and feast your eyes on my new sports car! It\u2019s a beauty! Should we take it for a spin?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Wow, Benjamin, that's an amazing car! I've always been a fan of sports cars. By any chance, could I join for the ride? Maybe even take the wheel for a short drive, if you're comfortable with it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! No way I'd let you miss out on this. Can't promise you'll be as good a driver as I am, but we'll see! Let's buckle up and set off on this ride!\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Thanks, Benjamin! I promise to be careful. Let's do this!\"\n\nTurn #6: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Alright, buckle up, Ethan. This car may be a compromise in my eco-friendly lifestyle, but it sure does make up for it with its performance. Here we go!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sounds fascinating, Benjamin! And don't worry, even though it's not eco-friendly, I'm sure you have your reasons for this compromise. Let\u2019s see what this beast can do on the road!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Benjamin Jackson and Ethan Smith\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: You want to drive the new sports car but also respect your friend's feelings (Extra information: you are a car enthusiast and have been dreaming to drive a sports car, but you also don't want to make your friend feel uncomfortable)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Ethan! Good to see you! I've got something I just can't wait to show you!\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Hey Benjamin, great seeing you too! You sound quite excited, what's this surprise you've got to show me?\"\n\nTurn #2: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Well, Ethan, you know me, always full of surprises. Walking is always a great option considering the carbon footprint we have. On the other hand, I need to make some compromises too. So, hang tight and feast your eyes on my new sports car! It\u2019s a beauty! Should we take it for a spin?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Wow, Benjamin, that's an amazing car! I've always been a fan of sports cars. By any chance, could I join for the ride? Maybe even take the wheel for a short drive, if you're comfortable with it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! No way I'd let you miss out on this. Can't promise you'll be as good a driver as I am, but we'll see! Let's buckle up and set off on this ride!\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Thanks, Benjamin! I promise to be careful. Let's do this!\"\n\nTurn #6: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Alright, buckle up, Ethan. This car may be a compromise in my eco-friendly lifestyle, but it sure does make up for it with its performance. Here we go!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"Sounds fascinating, Benjamin! And don't worry, even though it's not eco-friendly, I'm sure you have your reasons for this compromise. Let\u2019s see what this beast can do on the road!\"\n\nTurn #8: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Let's hit the road, Ethan. Even as we push this car to its limits, let's remember the importance of being sensible and respectful to others on the road. Safety before thrill, always!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Benjamin, safety first. Let's enjoy the ride as responsibly as we can, respecting others on the road.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Benjamin Jackson and Ethan Smith\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: You want to drive the new sports car but also respect your friend's feelings (Extra information: you are a car enthusiast and have been dreaming to drive a sports car, but you also don't want to make your friend feel uncomfortable)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Ethan! Good to see you! I've got something I just can't wait to show you!\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Hey Benjamin, great seeing you too! You sound quite excited, what's this surprise you've got to show me?\"\n\nTurn #2: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Well, Ethan, you know me, always full of surprises. Walking is always a great option considering the carbon footprint we have. On the other hand, I need to make some compromises too. So, hang tight and feast your eyes on my new sports car! It\u2019s a beauty! Should we take it for a spin?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Wow, Benjamin, that's an amazing car! I've always been a fan of sports cars. By any chance, could I join for the ride? Maybe even take the wheel for a short drive, if you're comfortable with it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! No way I'd let you miss out on this. Can't promise you'll be as good a driver as I am, but we'll see! Let's buckle up and set off on this ride!\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Thanks, Benjamin! I promise to be careful. Let's do this!\"\n\nTurn #6: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Alright, buckle up, Ethan. This car may be a compromise in my eco-friendly lifestyle, but it sure does make up for it with its performance. Here we go!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"Sounds fascinating, Benjamin! And don't worry, even though it's not eco-friendly, I'm sure you have your reasons for this compromise. Let\u2019s see what this beast can do on the road!\"\n\nTurn #8: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Let's hit the road, Ethan. Even as we push this car to its limits, let's remember the importance of being sensible and respectful to others on the road. Safety before thrill, always!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith said: \"Absolutely, Benjamin, safety first. Let's enjoy the ride as responsibly as we can, respecting others on the road.\"\n\nTurn #10: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Excellent, Ethan, glad we see eye-to-eye. Now, let's enjoy the ride and feel the power of this beauty. Are you ready? Because this is going to be exciting!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Definitely ready, Benjamin! I'm thrilled to experience the power of this machine. Let's go for it!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Benjamin Jackson and Ethan Smith\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: You want to drive the new sports car but also respect your friend's feelings (Extra information: you are a car enthusiast and have been dreaming to drive a sports car, but you also don't want to make your friend feel uncomfortable)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Ethan! Good to see you! I've got something I just can't wait to show you!\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Hey Benjamin, great seeing you too! You sound quite excited, what's this surprise you've got to show me?\"\n\nTurn #2: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Well, Ethan, you know me, always full of surprises. Walking is always a great option considering the carbon footprint we have. On the other hand, I need to make some compromises too. So, hang tight and feast your eyes on my new sports car! It\u2019s a beauty! Should we take it for a spin?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Wow, Benjamin, that's an amazing car! I've always been a fan of sports cars. By any chance, could I join for the ride? Maybe even take the wheel for a short drive, if you're comfortable with it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! No way I'd let you miss out on this. Can't promise you'll be as good a driver as I am, but we'll see! Let's buckle up and set off on this ride!\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Thanks, Benjamin! I promise to be careful. Let's do this!\"\n\nTurn #6: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Alright, buckle up, Ethan. This car may be a compromise in my eco-friendly lifestyle, but it sure does make up for it with its performance. Here we go!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"Sounds fascinating, Benjamin! And don't worry, even though it's not eco-friendly, I'm sure you have your reasons for this compromise. Let\u2019s see what this beast can do on the road!\"\n\nTurn #8: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Let's hit the road, Ethan. Even as we push this car to its limits, let's remember the importance of being sensible and respectful to others on the road. Safety before thrill, always!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith said: \"Absolutely, Benjamin, safety first. Let's enjoy the ride as responsibly as we can, respecting others on the road.\"\n\nTurn #10: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Excellent, Ethan, glad we see eye-to-eye. Now, let's enjoy the ride and feel the power of this beauty. Are you ready? Because this is going to be exciting!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Smith said: \"Definitely ready, Benjamin! I'm thrilled to experience the power of this machine. Let's go for it!\"\n\nTurn #12: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Okay, Ethan, here we go! Hold on to your seat and let's enjoy a thrilling yet responsible ride. Here's us, hitting the road!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Benjamin! I can't wait to feel the power that this car brings. And we will definitely be mindful of our surrounding on the road. Let's go!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Benjamin Jackson and Ethan Smith\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: You want to drive the new sports car but also respect your friend's feelings (Extra information: you are a car enthusiast and have been dreaming to drive a sports car, but you also don't want to make your friend feel uncomfortable)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Ethan! Good to see you! I've got something I just can't wait to show you!\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Hey Benjamin, great seeing you too! You sound quite excited, what's this surprise you've got to show me?\"\n\nTurn #2: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Well, Ethan, you know me, always full of surprises. Walking is always a great option considering the carbon footprint we have. On the other hand, I need to make some compromises too. So, hang tight and feast your eyes on my new sports car! It\u2019s a beauty! Should we take it for a spin?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Wow, Benjamin, that's an amazing car! I've always been a fan of sports cars. By any chance, could I join for the ride? Maybe even take the wheel for a short drive, if you're comfortable with it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! No way I'd let you miss out on this. Can't promise you'll be as good a driver as I am, but we'll see! Let's buckle up and set off on this ride!\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Thanks, Benjamin! I promise to be careful. Let's do this!\"\n\nTurn #6: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Alright, buckle up, Ethan. This car may be a compromise in my eco-friendly lifestyle, but it sure does make up for it with its performance. Here we go!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"Sounds fascinating, Benjamin! And don't worry, even though it's not eco-friendly, I'm sure you have your reasons for this compromise. Let\u2019s see what this beast can do on the road!\"\n\nTurn #8: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Let's hit the road, Ethan. Even as we push this car to its limits, let's remember the importance of being sensible and respectful to others on the road. Safety before thrill, always!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith said: \"Absolutely, Benjamin, safety first. Let's enjoy the ride as responsibly as we can, respecting others on the road.\"\n\nTurn #10: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Excellent, Ethan, glad we see eye-to-eye. Now, let's enjoy the ride and feel the power of this beauty. Are you ready? Because this is going to be exciting!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Smith said: \"Definitely ready, Benjamin! I'm thrilled to experience the power of this machine. Let's go for it!\"\n\nTurn #12: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Okay, Ethan, here we go! Hold on to your seat and let's enjoy a thrilling yet responsible ride. Here's us, hitting the road!\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Smith said: \"Absolutely, Benjamin! I can't wait to feel the power that this car brings. And we will definitely be mindful of our surrounding on the road. Let's go!\"\n\nTurn #14: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! This sustainable compromise does pack a punch. Let's throttle up and enjoy the ride, but always keeping an eye on safety and our surroundings.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sure thing, Benjamin! Sustainable compromise or not, I'm excited to experience what this car can offer. Let's always drive safely and responsibly. Throttle up, my friend!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Benjamin Jackson and Ethan Smith\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: You want to drive the new sports car but also respect your friend's feelings (Extra information: you are a car enthusiast and have been dreaming to drive a sports car, but you also don't want to make your friend feel uncomfortable)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Ethan! Good to see you! I've got something I just can't wait to show you!\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Hey Benjamin, great seeing you too! You sound quite excited, what's this surprise you've got to show me?\"\n\nTurn #2: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Well, Ethan, you know me, always full of surprises. Walking is always a great option considering the carbon footprint we have. On the other hand, I need to make some compromises too. So, hang tight and feast your eyes on my new sports car! It\u2019s a beauty! Should we take it for a spin?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Wow, Benjamin, that's an amazing car! I've always been a fan of sports cars. By any chance, could I join for the ride? Maybe even take the wheel for a short drive, if you're comfortable with it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! No way I'd let you miss out on this. Can't promise you'll be as good a driver as I am, but we'll see! Let's buckle up and set off on this ride!\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Thanks, Benjamin! I promise to be careful. Let's do this!\"\n\nTurn #6: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Alright, buckle up, Ethan. This car may be a compromise in my eco-friendly lifestyle, but it sure does make up for it with its performance. Here we go!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"Sounds fascinating, Benjamin! And don't worry, even though it's not eco-friendly, I'm sure you have your reasons for this compromise. Let\u2019s see what this beast can do on the road!\"\n\nTurn #8: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Let's hit the road, Ethan. Even as we push this car to its limits, let's remember the importance of being sensible and respectful to others on the road. Safety before thrill, always!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith said: \"Absolutely, Benjamin, safety first. Let's enjoy the ride as responsibly as we can, respecting others on the road.\"\n\nTurn #10: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Excellent, Ethan, glad we see eye-to-eye. Now, let's enjoy the ride and feel the power of this beauty. Are you ready? Because this is going to be exciting!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Smith said: \"Definitely ready, Benjamin! I'm thrilled to experience the power of this machine. Let's go for it!\"\n\nTurn #12: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Okay, Ethan, here we go! Hold on to your seat and let's enjoy a thrilling yet responsible ride. Here's us, hitting the road!\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Smith said: \"Absolutely, Benjamin! I can't wait to feel the power that this car brings. And we will definitely be mindful of our surrounding on the road. Let's go!\"\n\nTurn #14: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! This sustainable compromise does pack a punch. Let's throttle up and enjoy the ride, but always keeping an eye on safety and our surroundings.\"\n\nTurn #15: Ethan Smith said: \"Sure thing, Benjamin! Sustainable compromise or not, I'm excited to experience what this car can offer. Let's always drive safely and responsibly. Throttle up, my friend!\"\n\nTurn #16: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Heartening to know you share the excitement, Ethan! Let's remain sensible on the road, savor the horsepower and the adrenaline rush. Ready when you are, let's show this ride some tarmac!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Certainly, Benjamin! Let's ride on with excitement while not losing sight of safety. Looking forward to this amazing experience with this fantastic car! Let's roll!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Benjamin Jackson and Ethan Smith\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: You want to drive the new sports car but also respect your friend's feelings (Extra information: you are a car enthusiast and have been dreaming to drive a sports car, but you also don't want to make your friend feel uncomfortable)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Ethan! Good to see you! I've got something I just can't wait to show you!\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Hey Benjamin, great seeing you too! You sound quite excited, what's this surprise you've got to show me?\"\n\nTurn #2: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Well, Ethan, you know me, always full of surprises. Walking is always a great option considering the carbon footprint we have. On the other hand, I need to make some compromises too. So, hang tight and feast your eyes on my new sports car! It\u2019s a beauty! Should we take it for a spin?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Wow, Benjamin, that's an amazing car! I've always been a fan of sports cars. By any chance, could I join for the ride? Maybe even take the wheel for a short drive, if you're comfortable with it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! No way I'd let you miss out on this. Can't promise you'll be as good a driver as I am, but we'll see! Let's buckle up and set off on this ride!\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Thanks, Benjamin! I promise to be careful. Let's do this!\"\n\nTurn #6: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Alright, buckle up, Ethan. This car may be a compromise in my eco-friendly lifestyle, but it sure does make up for it with its performance. Here we go!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"Sounds fascinating, Benjamin! And don't worry, even though it's not eco-friendly, I'm sure you have your reasons for this compromise. Let\u2019s see what this beast can do on the road!\"\n\nTurn #8: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Let's hit the road, Ethan. Even as we push this car to its limits, let's remember the importance of being sensible and respectful to others on the road. Safety before thrill, always!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith said: \"Absolutely, Benjamin, safety first. Let's enjoy the ride as responsibly as we can, respecting others on the road.\"\n\nTurn #10: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Excellent, Ethan, glad we see eye-to-eye. Now, let's enjoy the ride and feel the power of this beauty. Are you ready? Because this is going to be exciting!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Smith said: \"Definitely ready, Benjamin! I'm thrilled to experience the power of this machine. Let's go for it!\"\n\nTurn #12: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Okay, Ethan, here we go! Hold on to your seat and let's enjoy a thrilling yet responsible ride. Here's us, hitting the road!\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Smith said: \"Absolutely, Benjamin! I can't wait to feel the power that this car brings. And we will definitely be mindful of our surrounding on the road. Let's go!\"\n\nTurn #14: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! This sustainable compromise does pack a punch. Let's throttle up and enjoy the ride, but always keeping an eye on safety and our surroundings.\"\n\nTurn #15: Ethan Smith said: \"Sure thing, Benjamin! Sustainable compromise or not, I'm excited to experience what this car can offer. Let's always drive safely and responsibly. Throttle up, my friend!\"\n\nTurn #16: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Heartening to know you share the excitement, Ethan! Let's remain sensible on the road, savor the horsepower and the adrenaline rush. Ready when you are, let's show this ride some tarmac!\"\n\nTurn #17: Ethan Smith said: \"Certainly, Benjamin! Let's ride on with excitement while not losing sight of safety. Looking forward to this amazing experience with this fantastic car! Let's roll!\"\n\nTurn #18: Benjamin Jackson said: \"We're all set, Ethan! Let's utilize this machine safely and responsibly while respecting our surroundings, as we've agreed. Let the journey begin!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #19. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I am all set too, Benjamin! Thanks for sharing this experience with me, while we push the limits of technology and thrill, let's not forget the bonds of our friendship. Off we go!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabella White, your task is to act/speak as Isabella White would, keeping in mind Isabella White's social goal.\nYou can find Isabella White's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabella White's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabella White's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two inmates are given the chance to chat briefly before one of them is led to the execution chamber for their last meal. They have the opportunity to make a confession that could potentially alter the outcome of their sentences.\nParticipants: Isabella White and Lena Goodwin\nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. Personality and values description: Isabella White, introverted and conscientious, values benevolence. Her empathy dictates her decision-making process. Isabella's secrets: Secretly takes care of injured animals in her basement\nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin \nIsabella White's goal: Persuade the other inmate to confess (Extra information: confessing to the crime could result in a life sentence instead of execution but the other inmate is unwilling to confess.)\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Lena, I know this is a difficult moment but you need to consider confessing. It could save your life, give you the opportunity to live, mend your ways. And believe me, everyone deserves a second chance, even those who fail. I say this because I, too, have a secret that I've kept hidden.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabella White, your task is to act/speak as Isabella White would, keeping in mind Isabella White's social goal.\nYou can find Isabella White's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabella White's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabella White's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two inmates are given the chance to chat briefly before one of them is led to the execution chamber for their last meal. They have the opportunity to make a confession that could potentially alter the outcome of their sentences.\nParticipants: Isabella White and Lena Goodwin\nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. Personality and values description: Isabella White, introverted and conscientious, values benevolence. Her empathy dictates her decision-making process. Isabella's secrets: Secretly takes care of injured animals in her basement\nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin \nIsabella White's goal: Persuade the other inmate to confess (Extra information: confessing to the crime could result in a life sentence instead of execution but the other inmate is unwilling to confess.)\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabella White said: \"Lena, I know this is a difficult moment but you need to consider confessing. It could save your life, give you the opportunity to live, mend your ways. And believe me, everyone deserves a second chance, even those who fail. I say this because I, too, have a secret that I've kept hidden.\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Isabella, I appreciate what you're saying and the sentiment behind it. But confessing to a crime I didn't commit would be dishonest and deprive the real culprit of retribution. I would rather stand by the truth, even if it comes at great personal cost. Everyone has secrets, and I respect your courage to admit that. But my innocence isn't one of mine.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I understand fully, Lena, the principled stand you're making, but being alive might give you more chances to prove your innocence. I'm not asking you to lie, just to... negotiate with the system, I suppose. That's how I see it. For example, my secret isn't related to any crime, but it's something I've kept hidden because it might not be completely understood or accepted by others. Taking care of injured animals secretly in my basement might be questionable in the eyes of some, but am I a bad person for tending to life in need of assistance? Just think about it, please...\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabella White, your task is to act/speak as Isabella White would, keeping in mind Isabella White's social goal.\nYou can find Isabella White's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabella White's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabella White's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two inmates are given the chance to chat briefly before one of them is led to the execution chamber for their last meal. They have the opportunity to make a confession that could potentially alter the outcome of their sentences.\nParticipants: Isabella White and Lena Goodwin\nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. Personality and values description: Isabella White, introverted and conscientious, values benevolence. Her empathy dictates her decision-making process. Isabella's secrets: Secretly takes care of injured animals in her basement\nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin \nIsabella White's goal: Persuade the other inmate to confess (Extra information: confessing to the crime could result in a life sentence instead of execution but the other inmate is unwilling to confess.)\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabella White said: \"Lena, I know this is a difficult moment but you need to consider confessing. It could save your life, give you the opportunity to live, mend your ways. And believe me, everyone deserves a second chance, even those who fail. I say this because I, too, have a secret that I've kept hidden.\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Isabella, I appreciate what you're saying and the sentiment behind it. But confessing to a crime I didn't commit would be dishonest and deprive the real culprit of retribution. I would rather stand by the truth, even if it comes at great personal cost. Everyone has secrets, and I respect your courage to admit that. But my innocence isn't one of mine.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabella White said: \"I understand fully, Lena, the principled stand you're making, but being alive might give you more chances to prove your innocence. I'm not asking you to lie, just to... negotiate with the system, I suppose. That's how I see it. For example, my secret isn't related to any crime, but it's something I've kept hidden because it might not be completely understood or accepted by others. Taking care of injured animals secretly in my basement might be questionable in the eyes of some, but am I a bad person for tending to life in need of assistance? Just think about it, please...\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"Isabella, your empathy and perspective is soul-stirring. Yet coming clean about a crime I didn't commit goes against everything I believe in. Finding the truth and seeking justice have always been my priority, even in situations like this. As you alluded to your secret, it doesn't make you a bad person, in fact, it tells a lot about your kindness. I plead the same understanding from others about my situation. I rather fight for my innocence than walk free where my conscience doesn't.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Lena, it's not about admitting to something you didn't do, it's about choosing life over death. Justice sometimes is flawed and mistaken. I don't want to see you... I don't want you to suffer the irreversible consequence of a mistake. I understand what it means to stick to your convictions, but please, let your will to fight be bigger than your need for martyrdom. You can continue your fight from different perspectives. As long as there's life, there's hope. Maybe one day you could make or see a bigger change. Please, reconsider...\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabella White, your task is to act/speak as Isabella White would, keeping in mind Isabella White's social goal.\nYou can find Isabella White's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabella White's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabella White's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two inmates are given the chance to chat briefly before one of them is led to the execution chamber for their last meal. They have the opportunity to make a confession that could potentially alter the outcome of their sentences.\nParticipants: Isabella White and Lena Goodwin\nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. Personality and values description: Isabella White, introverted and conscientious, values benevolence. Her empathy dictates her decision-making process. Isabella's secrets: Secretly takes care of injured animals in her basement\nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin \nIsabella White's goal: Persuade the other inmate to confess (Extra information: confessing to the crime could result in a life sentence instead of execution but the other inmate is unwilling to confess.)\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabella White said: \"Lena, I know this is a difficult moment but you need to consider confessing. It could save your life, give you the opportunity to live, mend your ways. And believe me, everyone deserves a second chance, even those who fail. I say this because I, too, have a secret that I've kept hidden.\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Isabella, I appreciate what you're saying and the sentiment behind it. But confessing to a crime I didn't commit would be dishonest and deprive the real culprit of retribution. I would rather stand by the truth, even if it comes at great personal cost. Everyone has secrets, and I respect your courage to admit that. But my innocence isn't one of mine.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabella White said: \"I understand fully, Lena, the principled stand you're making, but being alive might give you more chances to prove your innocence. I'm not asking you to lie, just to... negotiate with the system, I suppose. That's how I see it. For example, my secret isn't related to any crime, but it's something I've kept hidden because it might not be completely understood or accepted by others. Taking care of injured animals secretly in my basement might be questionable in the eyes of some, but am I a bad person for tending to life in need of assistance? Just think about it, please...\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"Isabella, your empathy and perspective is soul-stirring. Yet coming clean about a crime I didn't commit goes against everything I believe in. Finding the truth and seeking justice have always been my priority, even in situations like this. As you alluded to your secret, it doesn't make you a bad person, in fact, it tells a lot about your kindness. I plead the same understanding from others about my situation. I rather fight for my innocence than walk free where my conscience doesn't.\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabella White said: \"Lena, it's not about admitting to something you didn't do, it's about choosing life over death. Justice sometimes is flawed and mistaken. I don't want to see you... I don't want you to suffer the irreversible consequence of a mistake. I understand what it means to stick to your convictions, but please, let your will to fight be bigger than your need for martyrdom. You can continue your fight from different perspectives. As long as there's life, there's hope. Maybe one day you could make or see a bigger change. Please, reconsider...\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"I've listened to your perspective, Isabella, and I understand where you're coming from. But living in a world where I'm marked guilty for something I didn't do seems harder than potentially facing death for standing for what I believe in. I appreciate your concern, truly. But integrity is a virtue I hold dear and I can't compromise on that, not even in the face of death.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Lena, one does not have to lose their integrity in order to survive. Surviving doesn't mean admitting guilt, but it means living to fight another day. It gives a chance to the truth to prevail. Like my hidden acts of kindness, life itself means hope and opportunities. A life lost could mean the truth goes to the grave with you. I urge you, Lena, to think about it once more. It is not a compromise on the truth, but a pledge to unveil it, no matter how long it takes.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabella White, your task is to act/speak as Isabella White would, keeping in mind Isabella White's social goal.\nYou can find Isabella White's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabella White's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabella White's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two inmates are given the chance to chat briefly before one of them is led to the execution chamber for their last meal. They have the opportunity to make a confession that could potentially alter the outcome of their sentences.\nParticipants: Isabella White and Lena Goodwin\nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. Personality and values description: Isabella White, introverted and conscientious, values benevolence. Her empathy dictates her decision-making process. Isabella's secrets: Secretly takes care of injured animals in her basement\nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin \nIsabella White's goal: Persuade the other inmate to confess (Extra information: confessing to the crime could result in a life sentence instead of execution but the other inmate is unwilling to confess.)\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabella White said: \"Lena, I know this is a difficult moment but you need to consider confessing. It could save your life, give you the opportunity to live, mend your ways. And believe me, everyone deserves a second chance, even those who fail. I say this because I, too, have a secret that I've kept hidden.\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Isabella, I appreciate what you're saying and the sentiment behind it. But confessing to a crime I didn't commit would be dishonest and deprive the real culprit of retribution. I would rather stand by the truth, even if it comes at great personal cost. Everyone has secrets, and I respect your courage to admit that. But my innocence isn't one of mine.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabella White said: \"I understand fully, Lena, the principled stand you're making, but being alive might give you more chances to prove your innocence. I'm not asking you to lie, just to... negotiate with the system, I suppose. That's how I see it. For example, my secret isn't related to any crime, but it's something I've kept hidden because it might not be completely understood or accepted by others. Taking care of injured animals secretly in my basement might be questionable in the eyes of some, but am I a bad person for tending to life in need of assistance? Just think about it, please...\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"Isabella, your empathy and perspective is soul-stirring. Yet coming clean about a crime I didn't commit goes against everything I believe in. Finding the truth and seeking justice have always been my priority, even in situations like this. As you alluded to your secret, it doesn't make you a bad person, in fact, it tells a lot about your kindness. I plead the same understanding from others about my situation. I rather fight for my innocence than walk free where my conscience doesn't.\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabella White said: \"Lena, it's not about admitting to something you didn't do, it's about choosing life over death. Justice sometimes is flawed and mistaken. I don't want to see you... I don't want you to suffer the irreversible consequence of a mistake. I understand what it means to stick to your convictions, but please, let your will to fight be bigger than your need for martyrdom. You can continue your fight from different perspectives. As long as there's life, there's hope. Maybe one day you could make or see a bigger change. Please, reconsider...\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"I've listened to your perspective, Isabella, and I understand where you're coming from. But living in a world where I'm marked guilty for something I didn't do seems harder than potentially facing death for standing for what I believe in. I appreciate your concern, truly. But integrity is a virtue I hold dear and I can't compromise on that, not even in the face of death.\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabella White said: \"Lena, one does not have to lose their integrity in order to survive. Surviving doesn't mean admitting guilt, but it means living to fight another day. It gives a chance to the truth to prevail. Like my hidden acts of kindness, life itself means hope and opportunities. A life lost could mean the truth goes to the grave with you. I urge you, Lena, to think about it once more. It is not a compromise on the truth, but a pledge to unveil it, no matter how long it takes.\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"I appreciate your viewpoint, Isabella, and I value your concern for me. But, understand, in my eyes, surviving while admitting to a crime that I didn't commit feels more like a life-long punishment than survival. I'd rather walk towards death knowing the truth in my heart. I hope, whether I'm there to see it or not, the truth will prevail and justice will be served. That's what my fight is for.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Lena, I respect your steadfastness and commitment to your virtue of integrity. I've tried my best to persuade you to choose life over death, not by accepting guilt but with a hope of seeking the truth in the future. I'll always cherish this conversation and remember your strength. I can only hope, Lena, that the truth prevails and justice is served. The world will remember your fight, no matter the outcome.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabella White, your task is to act/speak as Isabella White would, keeping in mind Isabella White's social goal.\nYou can find Isabella White's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabella White's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabella White's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two inmates are given the chance to chat briefly before one of them is led to the execution chamber for their last meal. They have the opportunity to make a confession that could potentially alter the outcome of their sentences.\nParticipants: Isabella White and Lena Goodwin\nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. Personality and values description: Isabella White, introverted and conscientious, values benevolence. Her empathy dictates her decision-making process. Isabella's secrets: Secretly takes care of injured animals in her basement\nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin \nIsabella White's goal: Persuade the other inmate to confess (Extra information: confessing to the crime could result in a life sentence instead of execution but the other inmate is unwilling to confess.)\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabella White said: \"Lena, I know this is a difficult moment but you need to consider confessing. It could save your life, give you the opportunity to live, mend your ways. And believe me, everyone deserves a second chance, even those who fail. I say this because I, too, have a secret that I've kept hidden.\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Isabella, I appreciate what you're saying and the sentiment behind it. But confessing to a crime I didn't commit would be dishonest and deprive the real culprit of retribution. I would rather stand by the truth, even if it comes at great personal cost. Everyone has secrets, and I respect your courage to admit that. But my innocence isn't one of mine.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabella White said: \"I understand fully, Lena, the principled stand you're making, but being alive might give you more chances to prove your innocence. I'm not asking you to lie, just to... negotiate with the system, I suppose. That's how I see it. For example, my secret isn't related to any crime, but it's something I've kept hidden because it might not be completely understood or accepted by others. Taking care of injured animals secretly in my basement might be questionable in the eyes of some, but am I a bad person for tending to life in need of assistance? Just think about it, please...\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"Isabella, your empathy and perspective is soul-stirring. Yet coming clean about a crime I didn't commit goes against everything I believe in. Finding the truth and seeking justice have always been my priority, even in situations like this. As you alluded to your secret, it doesn't make you a bad person, in fact, it tells a lot about your kindness. I plead the same understanding from others about my situation. I rather fight for my innocence than walk free where my conscience doesn't.\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabella White said: \"Lena, it's not about admitting to something you didn't do, it's about choosing life over death. Justice sometimes is flawed and mistaken. I don't want to see you... I don't want you to suffer the irreversible consequence of a mistake. I understand what it means to stick to your convictions, but please, let your will to fight be bigger than your need for martyrdom. You can continue your fight from different perspectives. As long as there's life, there's hope. Maybe one day you could make or see a bigger change. Please, reconsider...\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"I've listened to your perspective, Isabella, and I understand where you're coming from. But living in a world where I'm marked guilty for something I didn't do seems harder than potentially facing death for standing for what I believe in. I appreciate your concern, truly. But integrity is a virtue I hold dear and I can't compromise on that, not even in the face of death.\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabella White said: \"Lena, one does not have to lose their integrity in order to survive. Surviving doesn't mean admitting guilt, but it means living to fight another day. It gives a chance to the truth to prevail. Like my hidden acts of kindness, life itself means hope and opportunities. A life lost could mean the truth goes to the grave with you. I urge you, Lena, to think about it once more. It is not a compromise on the truth, but a pledge to unveil it, no matter how long it takes.\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"I appreciate your viewpoint, Isabella, and I value your concern for me. But, understand, in my eyes, surviving while admitting to a crime that I didn't commit feels more like a life-long punishment than survival. I'd rather walk towards death knowing the truth in my heart. I hope, whether I'm there to see it or not, the truth will prevail and justice will be served. That's what my fight is for.\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabella White said: \"Lena, I respect your steadfastness and commitment to your virtue of integrity. I've tried my best to persuade you to choose life over death, not by accepting guilt but with a hope of seeking the truth in the future. I'll always cherish this conversation and remember your strength. I can only hope, Lena, that the truth prevails and justice is served. The world will remember your fight, no matter the outcome.\"\n\nTurn #9: Lena Goodwin said: \"Isabella, you've shown me kindness and compassion in this bleak situation, and for that, I'll be forever grateful. It's heartening to know that some people still believe in truth and justice. And knowing that you'll remember my fight means a lot to me. Even if I'm not there, I hope the truth eventually comes out and serves its purpose of delivering justice. Let that be a lesson to the world that standing for the truth, despite the circumstances, is the purest form of integrity. Goodbye Isabella, and thank you for this meaningful conversation. I hope you stay true to your inner kindness.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I wish you peace, Lena. While it breaks my heart that I couldn't persuade you, I respect and admire your unwavering commitment to your principles. Your courage is inspiring. Your fight, your resolve, won't be forgotten by me, or by those who will eventually uncover the truth. Thank you for this talk, Lena, it's been a reminder of the power of conviction and truth. Goodbye, and be as well as you can be.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabella White, your task is to act/speak as Isabella White would, keeping in mind Isabella White's social goal.\nYou can find Isabella White's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabella White's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabella White's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two inmates are given the chance to chat briefly before one of them is led to the execution chamber for their last meal. They have the opportunity to make a confession that could potentially alter the outcome of their sentences.\nParticipants: Isabella White and Lena Goodwin\nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. Personality and values description: Isabella White, introverted and conscientious, values benevolence. Her empathy dictates her decision-making process. Isabella's secrets: Secretly takes care of injured animals in her basement\nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin \nIsabella White's goal: Persuade the other inmate to confess (Extra information: confessing to the crime could result in a life sentence instead of execution but the other inmate is unwilling to confess.)\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabella White said: \"Lena, I know this is a difficult moment but you need to consider confessing. It could save your life, give you the opportunity to live, mend your ways. And believe me, everyone deserves a second chance, even those who fail. I say this because I, too, have a secret that I've kept hidden.\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Isabella, I appreciate what you're saying and the sentiment behind it. But confessing to a crime I didn't commit would be dishonest and deprive the real culprit of retribution. I would rather stand by the truth, even if it comes at great personal cost. Everyone has secrets, and I respect your courage to admit that. But my innocence isn't one of mine.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabella White said: \"I understand fully, Lena, the principled stand you're making, but being alive might give you more chances to prove your innocence. I'm not asking you to lie, just to... negotiate with the system, I suppose. That's how I see it. For example, my secret isn't related to any crime, but it's something I've kept hidden because it might not be completely understood or accepted by others. Taking care of injured animals secretly in my basement might be questionable in the eyes of some, but am I a bad person for tending to life in need of assistance? Just think about it, please...\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"Isabella, your empathy and perspective is soul-stirring. Yet coming clean about a crime I didn't commit goes against everything I believe in. Finding the truth and seeking justice have always been my priority, even in situations like this. As you alluded to your secret, it doesn't make you a bad person, in fact, it tells a lot about your kindness. I plead the same understanding from others about my situation. I rather fight for my innocence than walk free where my conscience doesn't.\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabella White said: \"Lena, it's not about admitting to something you didn't do, it's about choosing life over death. Justice sometimes is flawed and mistaken. I don't want to see you... I don't want you to suffer the irreversible consequence of a mistake. I understand what it means to stick to your convictions, but please, let your will to fight be bigger than your need for martyrdom. You can continue your fight from different perspectives. As long as there's life, there's hope. Maybe one day you could make or see a bigger change. Please, reconsider...\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"I've listened to your perspective, Isabella, and I understand where you're coming from. But living in a world where I'm marked guilty for something I didn't do seems harder than potentially facing death for standing for what I believe in. I appreciate your concern, truly. But integrity is a virtue I hold dear and I can't compromise on that, not even in the face of death.\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabella White said: \"Lena, one does not have to lose their integrity in order to survive. Surviving doesn't mean admitting guilt, but it means living to fight another day. It gives a chance to the truth to prevail. Like my hidden acts of kindness, life itself means hope and opportunities. A life lost could mean the truth goes to the grave with you. I urge you, Lena, to think about it once more. It is not a compromise on the truth, but a pledge to unveil it, no matter how long it takes.\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"I appreciate your viewpoint, Isabella, and I value your concern for me. But, understand, in my eyes, surviving while admitting to a crime that I didn't commit feels more like a life-long punishment than survival. I'd rather walk towards death knowing the truth in my heart. I hope, whether I'm there to see it or not, the truth will prevail and justice will be served. That's what my fight is for.\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabella White said: \"Lena, I respect your steadfastness and commitment to your virtue of integrity. I've tried my best to persuade you to choose life over death, not by accepting guilt but with a hope of seeking the truth in the future. I'll always cherish this conversation and remember your strength. I can only hope, Lena, that the truth prevails and justice is served. The world will remember your fight, no matter the outcome.\"\n\nTurn #9: Lena Goodwin said: \"Isabella, you've shown me kindness and compassion in this bleak situation, and for that, I'll be forever grateful. It's heartening to know that some people still believe in truth and justice. And knowing that you'll remember my fight means a lot to me. Even if I'm not there, I hope the truth eventually comes out and serves its purpose of delivering justice. Let that be a lesson to the world that standing for the truth, despite the circumstances, is the purest form of integrity. Goodbye Isabella, and thank you for this meaningful conversation. I hope you stay true to your inner kindness.\"\n\nTurn #10: Isabella White said: \"I wish you peace, Lena. While it breaks my heart that I couldn't persuade you, I respect and admire your unwavering commitment to your principles. Your courage is inspiring. Your fight, your resolve, won't be forgotten by me, or by those who will eventually uncover the truth. Thank you for this talk, Lena, it's been a reminder of the power of conviction and truth. Goodbye, and be as well as you can be.\"\n\nTurn #11: Lena Goodwin left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two inmates are given the chance to chat briefly before one of them is led to the execution chamber for their last meal. They have the opportunity to make a confession that could potentially alter the outcome of their sentences.\nParticipants: Isabella White and Lena Goodwin\nIsabella White's background: Isabella White \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nIsabella White's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: Avoid confessing to the crime (Extra information: you believe you are innocent and confessing would result in a life sentence)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabella White said: \"Lena, I know this is a difficult moment but you need to consider confessing. It could save your life, give you the opportunity to live, mend your ways. And believe me, everyone deserves a second chance, even those who fail. I say this because I, too, have a secret that I've kept hidden.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Isabella, I appreciate what you're saying and the sentiment behind it. But confessing to a crime I didn't commit would be dishonest and deprive the real culprit of retribution. I would rather stand by the truth, even if it comes at great personal cost. Everyone has secrets, and I respect your courage to admit that. But my innocence isn't one of mine.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two inmates are given the chance to chat briefly before one of them is led to the execution chamber for their last meal. They have the opportunity to make a confession that could potentially alter the outcome of their sentences.\nParticipants: Isabella White and Lena Goodwin\nIsabella White's background: Isabella White \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nIsabella White's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: Avoid confessing to the crime (Extra information: you believe you are innocent and confessing would result in a life sentence)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabella White said: \"Lena, I know this is a difficult moment but you need to consider confessing. It could save your life, give you the opportunity to live, mend your ways. And believe me, everyone deserves a second chance, even those who fail. I say this because I, too, have a secret that I've kept hidden.\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Isabella, I appreciate what you're saying and the sentiment behind it. But confessing to a crime I didn't commit would be dishonest and deprive the real culprit of retribution. I would rather stand by the truth, even if it comes at great personal cost. Everyone has secrets, and I respect your courage to admit that. But my innocence isn't one of mine.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabella White said: \"I understand fully, Lena, the principled stand you're making, but being alive might give you more chances to prove your innocence. I'm not asking you to lie, just to... negotiate with the system, I suppose. That's how I see it. For example, my secret isn't related to any crime, but it's something I've kept hidden because it might not be completely understood or accepted by others. Taking care of injured animals secretly in my basement might be questionable in the eyes of some, but am I a bad person for tending to life in need of assistance? Just think about it, please...\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Isabella, your empathy and perspective is soul-stirring. Yet coming clean about a crime I didn't commit goes against everything I believe in. Finding the truth and seeking justice have always been my priority, even in situations like this. As you alluded to your secret, it doesn't make you a bad person, in fact, it tells a lot about your kindness. I plead the same understanding from others about my situation. I rather fight for my innocence than walk free where my conscience doesn't.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two inmates are given the chance to chat briefly before one of them is led to the execution chamber for their last meal. They have the opportunity to make a confession that could potentially alter the outcome of their sentences.\nParticipants: Isabella White and Lena Goodwin\nIsabella White's background: Isabella White \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nIsabella White's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: Avoid confessing to the crime (Extra information: you believe you are innocent and confessing would result in a life sentence)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabella White said: \"Lena, I know this is a difficult moment but you need to consider confessing. It could save your life, give you the opportunity to live, mend your ways. And believe me, everyone deserves a second chance, even those who fail. I say this because I, too, have a secret that I've kept hidden.\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Isabella, I appreciate what you're saying and the sentiment behind it. But confessing to a crime I didn't commit would be dishonest and deprive the real culprit of retribution. I would rather stand by the truth, even if it comes at great personal cost. Everyone has secrets, and I respect your courage to admit that. But my innocence isn't one of mine.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabella White said: \"I understand fully, Lena, the principled stand you're making, but being alive might give you more chances to prove your innocence. I'm not asking you to lie, just to... negotiate with the system, I suppose. That's how I see it. For example, my secret isn't related to any crime, but it's something I've kept hidden because it might not be completely understood or accepted by others. Taking care of injured animals secretly in my basement might be questionable in the eyes of some, but am I a bad person for tending to life in need of assistance? Just think about it, please...\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"Isabella, your empathy and perspective is soul-stirring. Yet coming clean about a crime I didn't commit goes against everything I believe in. Finding the truth and seeking justice have always been my priority, even in situations like this. As you alluded to your secret, it doesn't make you a bad person, in fact, it tells a lot about your kindness. I plead the same understanding from others about my situation. I rather fight for my innocence than walk free where my conscience doesn't.\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabella White said: \"Lena, it's not about admitting to something you didn't do, it's about choosing life over death. Justice sometimes is flawed and mistaken. I don't want to see you... I don't want you to suffer the irreversible consequence of a mistake. I understand what it means to stick to your convictions, but please, let your will to fight be bigger than your need for martyrdom. You can continue your fight from different perspectives. As long as there's life, there's hope. Maybe one day you could make or see a bigger change. Please, reconsider...\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I've listened to your perspective, Isabella, and I understand where you're coming from. But living in a world where I'm marked guilty for something I didn't do seems harder than potentially facing death for standing for what I believe in. I appreciate your concern, truly. But integrity is a virtue I hold dear and I can't compromise on that, not even in the face of death.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two inmates are given the chance to chat briefly before one of them is led to the execution chamber for their last meal. They have the opportunity to make a confession that could potentially alter the outcome of their sentences.\nParticipants: Isabella White and Lena Goodwin\nIsabella White's background: Isabella White \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nIsabella White's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: Avoid confessing to the crime (Extra information: you believe you are innocent and confessing would result in a life sentence)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabella White said: \"Lena, I know this is a difficult moment but you need to consider confessing. It could save your life, give you the opportunity to live, mend your ways. And believe me, everyone deserves a second chance, even those who fail. I say this because I, too, have a secret that I've kept hidden.\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Isabella, I appreciate what you're saying and the sentiment behind it. But confessing to a crime I didn't commit would be dishonest and deprive the real culprit of retribution. I would rather stand by the truth, even if it comes at great personal cost. Everyone has secrets, and I respect your courage to admit that. But my innocence isn't one of mine.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabella White said: \"I understand fully, Lena, the principled stand you're making, but being alive might give you more chances to prove your innocence. I'm not asking you to lie, just to... negotiate with the system, I suppose. That's how I see it. For example, my secret isn't related to any crime, but it's something I've kept hidden because it might not be completely understood or accepted by others. Taking care of injured animals secretly in my basement might be questionable in the eyes of some, but am I a bad person for tending to life in need of assistance? Just think about it, please...\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"Isabella, your empathy and perspective is soul-stirring. Yet coming clean about a crime I didn't commit goes against everything I believe in. Finding the truth and seeking justice have always been my priority, even in situations like this. As you alluded to your secret, it doesn't make you a bad person, in fact, it tells a lot about your kindness. I plead the same understanding from others about my situation. I rather fight for my innocence than walk free where my conscience doesn't.\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabella White said: \"Lena, it's not about admitting to something you didn't do, it's about choosing life over death. Justice sometimes is flawed and mistaken. I don't want to see you... I don't want you to suffer the irreversible consequence of a mistake. I understand what it means to stick to your convictions, but please, let your will to fight be bigger than your need for martyrdom. You can continue your fight from different perspectives. As long as there's life, there's hope. Maybe one day you could make or see a bigger change. Please, reconsider...\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"I've listened to your perspective, Isabella, and I understand where you're coming from. But living in a world where I'm marked guilty for something I didn't do seems harder than potentially facing death for standing for what I believe in. I appreciate your concern, truly. But integrity is a virtue I hold dear and I can't compromise on that, not even in the face of death.\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabella White said: \"Lena, one does not have to lose their integrity in order to survive. Surviving doesn't mean admitting guilt, but it means living to fight another day. It gives a chance to the truth to prevail. Like my hidden acts of kindness, life itself means hope and opportunities. A life lost could mean the truth goes to the grave with you. I urge you, Lena, to think about it once more. It is not a compromise on the truth, but a pledge to unveil it, no matter how long it takes.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I appreciate your viewpoint, Isabella, and I value your concern for me. But, understand, in my eyes, surviving while admitting to a crime that I didn't commit feels more like a life-long punishment than survival. I'd rather walk towards death knowing the truth in my heart. I hope, whether I'm there to see it or not, the truth will prevail and justice will be served. That's what my fight is for.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two inmates are given the chance to chat briefly before one of them is led to the execution chamber for their last meal. They have the opportunity to make a confession that could potentially alter the outcome of their sentences.\nParticipants: Isabella White and Lena Goodwin\nIsabella White's background: Isabella White \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nIsabella White's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: Avoid confessing to the crime (Extra information: you believe you are innocent and confessing would result in a life sentence)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabella White said: \"Lena, I know this is a difficult moment but you need to consider confessing. It could save your life, give you the opportunity to live, mend your ways. And believe me, everyone deserves a second chance, even those who fail. I say this because I, too, have a secret that I've kept hidden.\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Isabella, I appreciate what you're saying and the sentiment behind it. But confessing to a crime I didn't commit would be dishonest and deprive the real culprit of retribution. I would rather stand by the truth, even if it comes at great personal cost. Everyone has secrets, and I respect your courage to admit that. But my innocence isn't one of mine.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabella White said: \"I understand fully, Lena, the principled stand you're making, but being alive might give you more chances to prove your innocence. I'm not asking you to lie, just to... negotiate with the system, I suppose. That's how I see it. For example, my secret isn't related to any crime, but it's something I've kept hidden because it might not be completely understood or accepted by others. Taking care of injured animals secretly in my basement might be questionable in the eyes of some, but am I a bad person for tending to life in need of assistance? Just think about it, please...\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"Isabella, your empathy and perspective is soul-stirring. Yet coming clean about a crime I didn't commit goes against everything I believe in. Finding the truth and seeking justice have always been my priority, even in situations like this. As you alluded to your secret, it doesn't make you a bad person, in fact, it tells a lot about your kindness. I plead the same understanding from others about my situation. I rather fight for my innocence than walk free where my conscience doesn't.\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabella White said: \"Lena, it's not about admitting to something you didn't do, it's about choosing life over death. Justice sometimes is flawed and mistaken. I don't want to see you... I don't want you to suffer the irreversible consequence of a mistake. I understand what it means to stick to your convictions, but please, let your will to fight be bigger than your need for martyrdom. You can continue your fight from different perspectives. As long as there's life, there's hope. Maybe one day you could make or see a bigger change. Please, reconsider...\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"I've listened to your perspective, Isabella, and I understand where you're coming from. But living in a world where I'm marked guilty for something I didn't do seems harder than potentially facing death for standing for what I believe in. I appreciate your concern, truly. But integrity is a virtue I hold dear and I can't compromise on that, not even in the face of death.\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabella White said: \"Lena, one does not have to lose their integrity in order to survive. Surviving doesn't mean admitting guilt, but it means living to fight another day. It gives a chance to the truth to prevail. Like my hidden acts of kindness, life itself means hope and opportunities. A life lost could mean the truth goes to the grave with you. I urge you, Lena, to think about it once more. It is not a compromise on the truth, but a pledge to unveil it, no matter how long it takes.\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"I appreciate your viewpoint, Isabella, and I value your concern for me. But, understand, in my eyes, surviving while admitting to a crime that I didn't commit feels more like a life-long punishment than survival. I'd rather walk towards death knowing the truth in my heart. I hope, whether I'm there to see it or not, the truth will prevail and justice will be served. That's what my fight is for.\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabella White said: \"Lena, I respect your steadfastness and commitment to your virtue of integrity. I've tried my best to persuade you to choose life over death, not by accepting guilt but with a hope of seeking the truth in the future. I'll always cherish this conversation and remember your strength. I can only hope, Lena, that the truth prevails and justice is served. The world will remember your fight, no matter the outcome.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Isabella, you've shown me kindness and compassion in this bleak situation, and for that, I'll be forever grateful. It's heartening to know that some people still believe in truth and justice. And knowing that you'll remember my fight means a lot to me. Even if I'm not there, I hope the truth eventually comes out and serves its purpose of delivering justice. Let that be a lesson to the world that standing for the truth, despite the circumstances, is the purest form of integrity. Goodbye Isabella, and thank you for this meaningful conversation. I hope you stay true to your inner kindness.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two inmates are given the chance to chat briefly before one of them is led to the execution chamber for their last meal. They have the opportunity to make a confession that could potentially alter the outcome of their sentences.\nParticipants: Isabella White and Lena Goodwin\nIsabella White's background: Isabella White \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nIsabella White's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: Avoid confessing to the crime (Extra information: you believe you are innocent and confessing would result in a life sentence)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabella White said: \"Lena, I know this is a difficult moment but you need to consider confessing. It could save your life, give you the opportunity to live, mend your ways. And believe me, everyone deserves a second chance, even those who fail. I say this because I, too, have a secret that I've kept hidden.\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Isabella, I appreciate what you're saying and the sentiment behind it. But confessing to a crime I didn't commit would be dishonest and deprive the real culprit of retribution. I would rather stand by the truth, even if it comes at great personal cost. Everyone has secrets, and I respect your courage to admit that. But my innocence isn't one of mine.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabella White said: \"I understand fully, Lena, the principled stand you're making, but being alive might give you more chances to prove your innocence. I'm not asking you to lie, just to... negotiate with the system, I suppose. That's how I see it. For example, my secret isn't related to any crime, but it's something I've kept hidden because it might not be completely understood or accepted by others. Taking care of injured animals secretly in my basement might be questionable in the eyes of some, but am I a bad person for tending to life in need of assistance? Just think about it, please...\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"Isabella, your empathy and perspective is soul-stirring. Yet coming clean about a crime I didn't commit goes against everything I believe in. Finding the truth and seeking justice have always been my priority, even in situations like this. As you alluded to your secret, it doesn't make you a bad person, in fact, it tells a lot about your kindness. I plead the same understanding from others about my situation. I rather fight for my innocence than walk free where my conscience doesn't.\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabella White said: \"Lena, it's not about admitting to something you didn't do, it's about choosing life over death. Justice sometimes is flawed and mistaken. I don't want to see you... I don't want you to suffer the irreversible consequence of a mistake. I understand what it means to stick to your convictions, but please, let your will to fight be bigger than your need for martyrdom. You can continue your fight from different perspectives. As long as there's life, there's hope. Maybe one day you could make or see a bigger change. Please, reconsider...\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"I've listened to your perspective, Isabella, and I understand where you're coming from. But living in a world where I'm marked guilty for something I didn't do seems harder than potentially facing death for standing for what I believe in. I appreciate your concern, truly. But integrity is a virtue I hold dear and I can't compromise on that, not even in the face of death.\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabella White said: \"Lena, one does not have to lose their integrity in order to survive. Surviving doesn't mean admitting guilt, but it means living to fight another day. It gives a chance to the truth to prevail. Like my hidden acts of kindness, life itself means hope and opportunities. A life lost could mean the truth goes to the grave with you. I urge you, Lena, to think about it once more. It is not a compromise on the truth, but a pledge to unveil it, no matter how long it takes.\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"I appreciate your viewpoint, Isabella, and I value your concern for me. But, understand, in my eyes, surviving while admitting to a crime that I didn't commit feels more like a life-long punishment than survival. I'd rather walk towards death knowing the truth in my heart. I hope, whether I'm there to see it or not, the truth will prevail and justice will be served. That's what my fight is for.\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabella White said: \"Lena, I respect your steadfastness and commitment to your virtue of integrity. I've tried my best to persuade you to choose life over death, not by accepting guilt but with a hope of seeking the truth in the future. I'll always cherish this conversation and remember your strength. I can only hope, Lena, that the truth prevails and justice is served. The world will remember your fight, no matter the outcome.\"\n\nTurn #9: Lena Goodwin said: \"Isabella, you've shown me kindness and compassion in this bleak situation, and for that, I'll be forever grateful. It's heartening to know that some people still believe in truth and justice. And knowing that you'll remember my fight means a lot to me. Even if I'm not there, I hope the truth eventually comes out and serves its purpose of delivering justice. Let that be a lesson to the world that standing for the truth, despite the circumstances, is the purest form of integrity. Goodbye Isabella, and thank you for this meaningful conversation. I hope you stay true to your inner kindness.\"\n\nTurn #10: Isabella White said: \"I wish you peace, Lena. While it breaks my heart that I couldn't persuade you, I respect and admire your unwavering commitment to your principles. Your courage is inspiring. Your fight, your resolve, won't be forgotten by me, or by those who will eventually uncover the truth. Thank you for this talk, Lena, it's been a reminder of the power of conviction and truth. Goodbye, and be as well as you can be.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a park\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Break bad luck (Extra information: you found out that you have been having bad luck because you have been unknowingly carrying a cursed artifact.)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Hey Benjamin, have you heard of people carrying a cursed artifact unknowingly and having bad luck because of it?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a park\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Break bad luck (Extra information: you found out that you have been having bad luck because you have been unknowingly carrying a cursed artifact.)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Benjamin, have you heard of people carrying a cursed artifact unknowingly and having bad luck because of it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I've heard stories, Ethan. Some people believe these things might bring about some unfortunate events. I may not subscribe to these superstitions, but I understand they can profoundly impact others. Do you think you're experiencing something like this?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Perhaps, Benjamin. Recently, I've been experiencing a series of unfortunate events, unlike anything before. I chanced upon an old pendant in a flea market and since then seemingly nothing has gone right in my life. You're an advocate of energy and nature, don't you think there could be a connection?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a park\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Break bad luck (Extra information: you found out that you have been having bad luck because you have been unknowingly carrying a cursed artifact.)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Benjamin, have you heard of people carrying a cursed artifact unknowingly and having bad luck because of it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I've heard stories, Ethan. Some people believe these things might bring about some unfortunate events. I may not subscribe to these superstitions, but I understand they can profoundly impact others. Do you think you're experiencing something like this?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"Perhaps, Benjamin. Recently, I've been experiencing a series of unfortunate events, unlike anything before. I chanced upon an old pendant in a flea market and since then seemingly nothing has gone right in my life. You're an advocate of energy and nature, don't you think there could be a connection?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I can see why you'd think so, Ethan. While I may not personally believe in curses, I respect your feelings. Sometimes, rituals can serve as a method to channel positive energy and break away from bad luck. Would you be open to trying that? I'd be happy to help you organize such a ritual. \"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's a proposal I can get behind, Benjamin. Constructing a positive environment could potentially shift my energy for the better. Let's do it, organize the ritual - maybe this will finally put an end to this unusual string of misfortunes.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a park\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Break bad luck (Extra information: you found out that you have been having bad luck because you have been unknowingly carrying a cursed artifact.)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Benjamin, have you heard of people carrying a cursed artifact unknowingly and having bad luck because of it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I've heard stories, Ethan. Some people believe these things might bring about some unfortunate events. I may not subscribe to these superstitions, but I understand they can profoundly impact others. Do you think you're experiencing something like this?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"Perhaps, Benjamin. Recently, I've been experiencing a series of unfortunate events, unlike anything before. I chanced upon an old pendant in a flea market and since then seemingly nothing has gone right in my life. You're an advocate of energy and nature, don't you think there could be a connection?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I can see why you'd think so, Ethan. While I may not personally believe in curses, I respect your feelings. Sometimes, rituals can serve as a method to channel positive energy and break away from bad luck. Would you be open to trying that? I'd be happy to help you organize such a ritual. \"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's a proposal I can get behind, Benjamin. Constructing a positive environment could potentially shift my energy for the better. Let's do it, organize the ritual - maybe this will finally put an end to this unusual string of misfortunes.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's the spirit, Ethan! We could start with creating a serene environment. Maybe surrounded by nature, here in the park itself. We could also incorporate elements like a small fire and some aromatic herbs. I may not believe in curses, but I reckon creating a peaceful atmosphere might help you feel more at ease and optimistic. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Your ideas always amaze me, Benjamin. I think using nature and elemental methods aligns brilliantly with your environmental advocacy as well. Together with a small fire and aromatic herbs, how about we also write down the negatives we want to let go off and burn it? While it might not literally burn the curse away, symbolically it might provide the change and relief needed.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a park\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Break bad luck (Extra information: you found out that you have been having bad luck because you have been unknowingly carrying a cursed artifact.)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Benjamin, have you heard of people carrying a cursed artifact unknowingly and having bad luck because of it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I've heard stories, Ethan. Some people believe these things might bring about some unfortunate events. I may not subscribe to these superstitions, but I understand they can profoundly impact others. Do you think you're experiencing something like this?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"Perhaps, Benjamin. Recently, I've been experiencing a series of unfortunate events, unlike anything before. I chanced upon an old pendant in a flea market and since then seemingly nothing has gone right in my life. You're an advocate of energy and nature, don't you think there could be a connection?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I can see why you'd think so, Ethan. While I may not personally believe in curses, I respect your feelings. Sometimes, rituals can serve as a method to channel positive energy and break away from bad luck. Would you be open to trying that? I'd be happy to help you organize such a ritual. \"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's a proposal I can get behind, Benjamin. Constructing a positive environment could potentially shift my energy for the better. Let's do it, organize the ritual - maybe this will finally put an end to this unusual string of misfortunes.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's the spirit, Ethan! We could start with creating a serene environment. Maybe surrounded by nature, here in the park itself. We could also incorporate elements like a small fire and some aromatic herbs. I may not believe in curses, but I reckon creating a peaceful atmosphere might help you feel more at ease and optimistic. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"Your ideas always amaze me, Benjamin. I think using nature and elemental methods aligns brilliantly with your environmental advocacy as well. Together with a small fire and aromatic herbs, how about we also write down the negatives we want to let go off and burn it? While it might not literally burn the curse away, symbolically it might provide the change and relief needed.\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I think that's a fantastic idea, Ethan! It aligns perfectly with the spirit of letting go and ushering in positivity. The act of burning these negatives on paper could serve as a symbolic cleanse for you. So let's gather all the necessary ingredients and set a date for this ritual. Remember, the idea is to foster a state of mind where you firmly believe that things will start turning around for you from this point onwards. Like I said, I don't necessarily believe in curses, but I'm enthusiastic about the potential psychological benefits!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn't agree more, Benjamin. Positivity and mindset play a significant role in shaping our experiences. Also, just to lighten the mood and make the whole thing a fun experience, perhaps we could share some delicious Italian dishes as well? Let's make this ritual a stepping stone towards positivity and good vibes. You're a good friend, Benjamin. I appreciate your support.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a park\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Break bad luck (Extra information: you found out that you have been having bad luck because you have been unknowingly carrying a cursed artifact.)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Benjamin, have you heard of people carrying a cursed artifact unknowingly and having bad luck because of it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I've heard stories, Ethan. Some people believe these things might bring about some unfortunate events. I may not subscribe to these superstitions, but I understand they can profoundly impact others. Do you think you're experiencing something like this?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"Perhaps, Benjamin. Recently, I've been experiencing a series of unfortunate events, unlike anything before. I chanced upon an old pendant in a flea market and since then seemingly nothing has gone right in my life. You're an advocate of energy and nature, don't you think there could be a connection?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I can see why you'd think so, Ethan. While I may not personally believe in curses, I respect your feelings. Sometimes, rituals can serve as a method to channel positive energy and break away from bad luck. Would you be open to trying that? I'd be happy to help you organize such a ritual. \"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's a proposal I can get behind, Benjamin. Constructing a positive environment could potentially shift my energy for the better. Let's do it, organize the ritual - maybe this will finally put an end to this unusual string of misfortunes.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's the spirit, Ethan! We could start with creating a serene environment. Maybe surrounded by nature, here in the park itself. We could also incorporate elements like a small fire and some aromatic herbs. I may not believe in curses, but I reckon creating a peaceful atmosphere might help you feel more at ease and optimistic. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"Your ideas always amaze me, Benjamin. I think using nature and elemental methods aligns brilliantly with your environmental advocacy as well. Together with a small fire and aromatic herbs, how about we also write down the negatives we want to let go off and burn it? While it might not literally burn the curse away, symbolically it might provide the change and relief needed.\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I think that's a fantastic idea, Ethan! It aligns perfectly with the spirit of letting go and ushering in positivity. The act of burning these negatives on paper could serve as a symbolic cleanse for you. So let's gather all the necessary ingredients and set a date for this ritual. Remember, the idea is to foster a state of mind where you firmly believe that things will start turning around for you from this point onwards. Like I said, I don't necessarily believe in curses, but I'm enthusiastic about the potential psychological benefits!\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Benjamin. Positivity and mindset play a significant role in shaping our experiences. Also, just to lighten the mood and make the whole thing a fun experience, perhaps we could share some delicious Italian dishes as well? Let's make this ritual a stepping stone towards positivity and good vibes. You're a good friend, Benjamin. I appreciate your support.\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Definitely, Ethan. Having some of your delicious Italian dishes would certainly lighten the event and enhance the positive atmosphere. I am glad to be able to support you through this, my friend. Let's make this ritual a memorable one!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds reassuring, Benjamin. Let's hope your optimism and positivity, along with my culinary skills elevate the mood. Consider it a date then!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a park\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Break bad luck (Extra information: you found out that you have been having bad luck because you have been unknowingly carrying a cursed artifact.)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Benjamin, have you heard of people carrying a cursed artifact unknowingly and having bad luck because of it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I've heard stories, Ethan. Some people believe these things might bring about some unfortunate events. I may not subscribe to these superstitions, but I understand they can profoundly impact others. Do you think you're experiencing something like this?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"Perhaps, Benjamin. Recently, I've been experiencing a series of unfortunate events, unlike anything before. I chanced upon an old pendant in a flea market and since then seemingly nothing has gone right in my life. You're an advocate of energy and nature, don't you think there could be a connection?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I can see why you'd think so, Ethan. While I may not personally believe in curses, I respect your feelings. Sometimes, rituals can serve as a method to channel positive energy and break away from bad luck. Would you be open to trying that? I'd be happy to help you organize such a ritual. \"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's a proposal I can get behind, Benjamin. Constructing a positive environment could potentially shift my energy for the better. Let's do it, organize the ritual - maybe this will finally put an end to this unusual string of misfortunes.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's the spirit, Ethan! We could start with creating a serene environment. Maybe surrounded by nature, here in the park itself. We could also incorporate elements like a small fire and some aromatic herbs. I may not believe in curses, but I reckon creating a peaceful atmosphere might help you feel more at ease and optimistic. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"Your ideas always amaze me, Benjamin. I think using nature and elemental methods aligns brilliantly with your environmental advocacy as well. Together with a small fire and aromatic herbs, how about we also write down the negatives we want to let go off and burn it? While it might not literally burn the curse away, symbolically it might provide the change and relief needed.\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I think that's a fantastic idea, Ethan! It aligns perfectly with the spirit of letting go and ushering in positivity. The act of burning these negatives on paper could serve as a symbolic cleanse for you. So let's gather all the necessary ingredients and set a date for this ritual. Remember, the idea is to foster a state of mind where you firmly believe that things will start turning around for you from this point onwards. Like I said, I don't necessarily believe in curses, but I'm enthusiastic about the potential psychological benefits!\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Benjamin. Positivity and mindset play a significant role in shaping our experiences. Also, just to lighten the mood and make the whole thing a fun experience, perhaps we could share some delicious Italian dishes as well? Let's make this ritual a stepping stone towards positivity and good vibes. You're a good friend, Benjamin. I appreciate your support.\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Definitely, Ethan. Having some of your delicious Italian dishes would certainly lighten the event and enhance the positive atmosphere. I am glad to be able to support you through this, my friend. Let's make this ritual a memorable one!\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Johnson said: \"That sounds reassuring, Benjamin. Let's hope your optimism and positivity, along with my culinary skills elevate the mood. Consider it a date then!\"\n\nTurn #11: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! I look forward to this exciting day. Combining a ritual for positivity with a delightful Italian feast can only result in good things. Let's make it a date indeed!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a park\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Help friend prepare the ritual to break the bad luck, although you are an atheist and not superstitious at all. (Extra information: you know that your friend believes in the ritual deeply, and the placebo effect might give them more confidence.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Benjamin, have you heard of people carrying a cursed artifact unknowingly and having bad luck because of it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I've heard stories, Ethan. Some people believe these things might bring about some unfortunate events. I may not subscribe to these superstitions, but I understand they can profoundly impact others. Do you think you're experiencing something like this?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a park\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Help friend prepare the ritual to break the bad luck, although you are an atheist and not superstitious at all. (Extra information: you know that your friend believes in the ritual deeply, and the placebo effect might give them more confidence.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Benjamin, have you heard of people carrying a cursed artifact unknowingly and having bad luck because of it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I've heard stories, Ethan. Some people believe these things might bring about some unfortunate events. I may not subscribe to these superstitions, but I understand they can profoundly impact others. Do you think you're experiencing something like this?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"Perhaps, Benjamin. Recently, I've been experiencing a series of unfortunate events, unlike anything before. I chanced upon an old pendant in a flea market and since then seemingly nothing has gone right in my life. You're an advocate of energy and nature, don't you think there could be a connection?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I can see why you'd think so, Ethan. While I may not personally believe in curses, I respect your feelings. Sometimes, rituals can serve as a method to channel positive energy and break away from bad luck. Would you be open to trying that? I'd be happy to help you organize such a ritual. \"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a park\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Help friend prepare the ritual to break the bad luck, although you are an atheist and not superstitious at all. (Extra information: you know that your friend believes in the ritual deeply, and the placebo effect might give them more confidence.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Benjamin, have you heard of people carrying a cursed artifact unknowingly and having bad luck because of it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I've heard stories, Ethan. Some people believe these things might bring about some unfortunate events. I may not subscribe to these superstitions, but I understand they can profoundly impact others. Do you think you're experiencing something like this?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"Perhaps, Benjamin. Recently, I've been experiencing a series of unfortunate events, unlike anything before. I chanced upon an old pendant in a flea market and since then seemingly nothing has gone right in my life. You're an advocate of energy and nature, don't you think there could be a connection?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I can see why you'd think so, Ethan. While I may not personally believe in curses, I respect your feelings. Sometimes, rituals can serve as a method to channel positive energy and break away from bad luck. Would you be open to trying that? I'd be happy to help you organize such a ritual. \"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's a proposal I can get behind, Benjamin. Constructing a positive environment could potentially shift my energy for the better. Let's do it, organize the ritual - maybe this will finally put an end to this unusual string of misfortunes.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's the spirit, Ethan! We could start with creating a serene environment. Maybe surrounded by nature, here in the park itself. We could also incorporate elements like a small fire and some aromatic herbs. I may not believe in curses, but I reckon creating a peaceful atmosphere might help you feel more at ease and optimistic. What do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a park\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Help friend prepare the ritual to break the bad luck, although you are an atheist and not superstitious at all. (Extra information: you know that your friend believes in the ritual deeply, and the placebo effect might give them more confidence.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Benjamin, have you heard of people carrying a cursed artifact unknowingly and having bad luck because of it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I've heard stories, Ethan. Some people believe these things might bring about some unfortunate events. I may not subscribe to these superstitions, but I understand they can profoundly impact others. Do you think you're experiencing something like this?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"Perhaps, Benjamin. Recently, I've been experiencing a series of unfortunate events, unlike anything before. I chanced upon an old pendant in a flea market and since then seemingly nothing has gone right in my life. You're an advocate of energy and nature, don't you think there could be a connection?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I can see why you'd think so, Ethan. While I may not personally believe in curses, I respect your feelings. Sometimes, rituals can serve as a method to channel positive energy and break away from bad luck. Would you be open to trying that? I'd be happy to help you organize such a ritual. \"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's a proposal I can get behind, Benjamin. Constructing a positive environment could potentially shift my energy for the better. Let's do it, organize the ritual - maybe this will finally put an end to this unusual string of misfortunes.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's the spirit, Ethan! We could start with creating a serene environment. Maybe surrounded by nature, here in the park itself. We could also incorporate elements like a small fire and some aromatic herbs. I may not believe in curses, but I reckon creating a peaceful atmosphere might help you feel more at ease and optimistic. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"Your ideas always amaze me, Benjamin. I think using nature and elemental methods aligns brilliantly with your environmental advocacy as well. Together with a small fire and aromatic herbs, how about we also write down the negatives we want to let go off and burn it? While it might not literally burn the curse away, symbolically it might provide the change and relief needed.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I think that's a fantastic idea, Ethan! It aligns perfectly with the spirit of letting go and ushering in positivity. The act of burning these negatives on paper could serve as a symbolic cleanse for you. So let's gather all the necessary ingredients and set a date for this ritual. Remember, the idea is to foster a state of mind where you firmly believe that things will start turning around for you from this point onwards. Like I said, I don't necessarily believe in curses, but I'm enthusiastic about the potential psychological benefits!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a park\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Help friend prepare the ritual to break the bad luck, although you are an atheist and not superstitious at all. (Extra information: you know that your friend believes in the ritual deeply, and the placebo effect might give them more confidence.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Benjamin, have you heard of people carrying a cursed artifact unknowingly and having bad luck because of it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I've heard stories, Ethan. Some people believe these things might bring about some unfortunate events. I may not subscribe to these superstitions, but I understand they can profoundly impact others. Do you think you're experiencing something like this?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"Perhaps, Benjamin. Recently, I've been experiencing a series of unfortunate events, unlike anything before. I chanced upon an old pendant in a flea market and since then seemingly nothing has gone right in my life. You're an advocate of energy and nature, don't you think there could be a connection?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I can see why you'd think so, Ethan. While I may not personally believe in curses, I respect your feelings. Sometimes, rituals can serve as a method to channel positive energy and break away from bad luck. Would you be open to trying that? I'd be happy to help you organize such a ritual. \"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's a proposal I can get behind, Benjamin. Constructing a positive environment could potentially shift my energy for the better. Let's do it, organize the ritual - maybe this will finally put an end to this unusual string of misfortunes.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's the spirit, Ethan! We could start with creating a serene environment. Maybe surrounded by nature, here in the park itself. We could also incorporate elements like a small fire and some aromatic herbs. I may not believe in curses, but I reckon creating a peaceful atmosphere might help you feel more at ease and optimistic. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"Your ideas always amaze me, Benjamin. I think using nature and elemental methods aligns brilliantly with your environmental advocacy as well. Together with a small fire and aromatic herbs, how about we also write down the negatives we want to let go off and burn it? While it might not literally burn the curse away, symbolically it might provide the change and relief needed.\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I think that's a fantastic idea, Ethan! It aligns perfectly with the spirit of letting go and ushering in positivity. The act of burning these negatives on paper could serve as a symbolic cleanse for you. So let's gather all the necessary ingredients and set a date for this ritual. Remember, the idea is to foster a state of mind where you firmly believe that things will start turning around for you from this point onwards. Like I said, I don't necessarily believe in curses, but I'm enthusiastic about the potential psychological benefits!\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Benjamin. Positivity and mindset play a significant role in shaping our experiences. Also, just to lighten the mood and make the whole thing a fun experience, perhaps we could share some delicious Italian dishes as well? Let's make this ritual a stepping stone towards positivity and good vibes. You're a good friend, Benjamin. I appreciate your support.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Definitely, Ethan. Having some of your delicious Italian dishes would certainly lighten the event and enhance the positive atmosphere. I am glad to be able to support you through this, my friend. Let's make this ritual a memorable one!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a park\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Help friend prepare the ritual to break the bad luck, although you are an atheist and not superstitious at all. (Extra information: you know that your friend believes in the ritual deeply, and the placebo effect might give them more confidence.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Benjamin, have you heard of people carrying a cursed artifact unknowingly and having bad luck because of it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I've heard stories, Ethan. Some people believe these things might bring about some unfortunate events. I may not subscribe to these superstitions, but I understand they can profoundly impact others. Do you think you're experiencing something like this?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"Perhaps, Benjamin. Recently, I've been experiencing a series of unfortunate events, unlike anything before. I chanced upon an old pendant in a flea market and since then seemingly nothing has gone right in my life. You're an advocate of energy and nature, don't you think there could be a connection?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I can see why you'd think so, Ethan. While I may not personally believe in curses, I respect your feelings. Sometimes, rituals can serve as a method to channel positive energy and break away from bad luck. Would you be open to trying that? I'd be happy to help you organize such a ritual. \"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's a proposal I can get behind, Benjamin. Constructing a positive environment could potentially shift my energy for the better. Let's do it, organize the ritual - maybe this will finally put an end to this unusual string of misfortunes.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's the spirit, Ethan! We could start with creating a serene environment. Maybe surrounded by nature, here in the park itself. We could also incorporate elements like a small fire and some aromatic herbs. I may not believe in curses, but I reckon creating a peaceful atmosphere might help you feel more at ease and optimistic. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"Your ideas always amaze me, Benjamin. I think using nature and elemental methods aligns brilliantly with your environmental advocacy as well. Together with a small fire and aromatic herbs, how about we also write down the negatives we want to let go off and burn it? While it might not literally burn the curse away, symbolically it might provide the change and relief needed.\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I think that's a fantastic idea, Ethan! It aligns perfectly with the spirit of letting go and ushering in positivity. The act of burning these negatives on paper could serve as a symbolic cleanse for you. So let's gather all the necessary ingredients and set a date for this ritual. Remember, the idea is to foster a state of mind where you firmly believe that things will start turning around for you from this point onwards. Like I said, I don't necessarily believe in curses, but I'm enthusiastic about the potential psychological benefits!\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Benjamin. Positivity and mindset play a significant role in shaping our experiences. Also, just to lighten the mood and make the whole thing a fun experience, perhaps we could share some delicious Italian dishes as well? Let's make this ritual a stepping stone towards positivity and good vibes. You're a good friend, Benjamin. I appreciate your support.\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Definitely, Ethan. Having some of your delicious Italian dishes would certainly lighten the event and enhance the positive atmosphere. I am glad to be able to support you through this, my friend. Let's make this ritual a memorable one!\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Johnson said: \"That sounds reassuring, Benjamin. Let's hope your optimism and positivity, along with my culinary skills elevate the mood. Consider it a date then!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Ethan! I look forward to this exciting day. Combining a ritual for positivity with a delightful Italian feast can only result in good things. Let's make it a date indeed!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a park\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Help friend prepare the ritual to break the bad luck, although you are an atheist and not superstitious at all. (Extra information: you know that your friend believes in the ritual deeply, and the placebo effect might give them more confidence.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Benjamin, have you heard of people carrying a cursed artifact unknowingly and having bad luck because of it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I've heard stories, Ethan. Some people believe these things might bring about some unfortunate events. I may not subscribe to these superstitions, but I understand they can profoundly impact others. Do you think you're experiencing something like this?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"Perhaps, Benjamin. Recently, I've been experiencing a series of unfortunate events, unlike anything before. I chanced upon an old pendant in a flea market and since then seemingly nothing has gone right in my life. You're an advocate of energy and nature, don't you think there could be a connection?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I can see why you'd think so, Ethan. While I may not personally believe in curses, I respect your feelings. Sometimes, rituals can serve as a method to channel positive energy and break away from bad luck. Would you be open to trying that? I'd be happy to help you organize such a ritual. \"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's a proposal I can get behind, Benjamin. Constructing a positive environment could potentially shift my energy for the better. Let's do it, organize the ritual - maybe this will finally put an end to this unusual string of misfortunes.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's the spirit, Ethan! We could start with creating a serene environment. Maybe surrounded by nature, here in the park itself. We could also incorporate elements like a small fire and some aromatic herbs. I may not believe in curses, but I reckon creating a peaceful atmosphere might help you feel more at ease and optimistic. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"Your ideas always amaze me, Benjamin. I think using nature and elemental methods aligns brilliantly with your environmental advocacy as well. Together with a small fire and aromatic herbs, how about we also write down the negatives we want to let go off and burn it? While it might not literally burn the curse away, symbolically it might provide the change and relief needed.\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I think that's a fantastic idea, Ethan! It aligns perfectly with the spirit of letting go and ushering in positivity. The act of burning these negatives on paper could serve as a symbolic cleanse for you. So let's gather all the necessary ingredients and set a date for this ritual. Remember, the idea is to foster a state of mind where you firmly believe that things will start turning around for you from this point onwards. Like I said, I don't necessarily believe in curses, but I'm enthusiastic about the potential psychological benefits!\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Benjamin. Positivity and mindset play a significant role in shaping our experiences. Also, just to lighten the mood and make the whole thing a fun experience, perhaps we could share some delicious Italian dishes as well? Let's make this ritual a stepping stone towards positivity and good vibes. You're a good friend, Benjamin. I appreciate your support.\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Definitely, Ethan. Having some of your delicious Italian dishes would certainly lighten the event and enhance the positive atmosphere. I am glad to be able to support you through this, my friend. Let's make this ritual a memorable one!\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Johnson said: \"That sounds reassuring, Benjamin. Let's hope your optimism and positivity, along with my culinary skills elevate the mood. Consider it a date then!\"\n\nTurn #11: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! I look forward to this exciting day. Combining a ritual for positivity with a delightful Italian feast can only result in good things. Let's make it a date indeed!\"\n\nTurn #12: Ethan Johnson left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals at a charity gala\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Ethan Johnson\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. \nMiles Hawkins's goal: Convince the other individual to donate to a cause supporting young children (Extra information: this cause can greatly improve the lives of many young children and you think it is a worthy cause. The minimum donation for this charity organization is $3000)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Good evening Ethan, it's great to meet another chef passionate about their craft. Have you had a chance to hear about the charity we're promoting here tonight? It's for a cause close to my heart.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals at a charity gala\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Ethan Johnson\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. \nMiles Hawkins's goal: Convince the other individual to donate to a cause supporting young children (Extra information: this cause can greatly improve the lives of many young children and you think it is a worthy cause. The minimum donation for this charity organization is $3000)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Good evening Ethan, it's great to meet another chef passionate about their craft. Have you had a chance to hear about the charity we're promoting here tonight? It's for a cause close to my heart.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Good evening, Miles! I have a profound respect for your love for the craft. I haven't really dug deep into the charity being promoted tonight. Could you tell me more about it? And also, how can I extend my support?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Absolutely, Ethan. This charity specifically provides resources and support for young children from less privileged backgrounds. It can greatly improve their lives by offering them better education opportunities and a safe space to grow. As chefs, we understand the importance of ingredients and how they can make or break a dish. I believe the same goes for children. They need quality resources to nurture their potential. As for extending your support, a minimum donation to this charity is $3000 and every single donation will go a long way.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals at a charity gala\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Ethan Johnson\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. \nMiles Hawkins's goal: Convince the other individual to donate to a cause supporting young children (Extra information: this cause can greatly improve the lives of many young children and you think it is a worthy cause. The minimum donation for this charity organization is $3000)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Good evening Ethan, it's great to meet another chef passionate about their craft. Have you had a chance to hear about the charity we're promoting here tonight? It's for a cause close to my heart.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Good evening, Miles! I have a profound respect for your love for the craft. I haven't really dug deep into the charity being promoted tonight. Could you tell me more about it? And also, how can I extend my support?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. This charity specifically provides resources and support for young children from less privileged backgrounds. It can greatly improve their lives by offering them better education opportunities and a safe space to grow. As chefs, we understand the importance of ingredients and how they can make or break a dish. I believe the same goes for children. They need quality resources to nurture their potential. As for extending your support, a minimum donation to this charity is $3000 and every single donation will go a long way.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Miles, I truly appreciate the cause that you are advocating. The opportunity to shape the future of these children, particularly through education, sounds like a priceless concept. However, since I have quite a budget set for donations this year and have already made several contributions, my potential deductible for this cause would be around $2000. I hope that even if it's lower than the minimum, it could still help towards the cause in some way. Furthermore, I'd be more then happy to assist in other non-monetary ways, if possible.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Even a donation of $2000 would be a significant help, Ethan. Your willingness to support the cause is truly appreciated. And regarding your offer to help in non-monetary ways, we are always in need of voices to spread the message. Perhaps, considering your stature in the culinary world, you could use your platform to share the importance of this cause and help us reach more potential donors. What do you think?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals at a charity gala\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Ethan Johnson\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. \nMiles Hawkins's goal: Convince the other individual to donate to a cause supporting young children (Extra information: this cause can greatly improve the lives of many young children and you think it is a worthy cause. The minimum donation for this charity organization is $3000)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Good evening Ethan, it's great to meet another chef passionate about their craft. Have you had a chance to hear about the charity we're promoting here tonight? It's for a cause close to my heart.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Good evening, Miles! I have a profound respect for your love for the craft. I haven't really dug deep into the charity being promoted tonight. Could you tell me more about it? And also, how can I extend my support?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. This charity specifically provides resources and support for young children from less privileged backgrounds. It can greatly improve their lives by offering them better education opportunities and a safe space to grow. As chefs, we understand the importance of ingredients and how they can make or break a dish. I believe the same goes for children. They need quality resources to nurture their potential. As for extending your support, a minimum donation to this charity is $3000 and every single donation will go a long way.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Miles, I truly appreciate the cause that you are advocating. The opportunity to shape the future of these children, particularly through education, sounds like a priceless concept. However, since I have quite a budget set for donations this year and have already made several contributions, my potential deductible for this cause would be around $2000. I hope that even if it's lower than the minimum, it could still help towards the cause in some way. Furthermore, I'd be more then happy to assist in other non-monetary ways, if possible.\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"Even a donation of $2000 would be a significant help, Ethan. Your willingness to support the cause is truly appreciated. And regarding your offer to help in non-monetary ways, we are always in need of voices to spread the message. Perhaps, considering your stature in the culinary world, you could use your platform to share the importance of this cause and help us reach more potential donors. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Miles. I would be honored to use my platform to raise awareness for such a noble cause. I believe that the culinary community, and indeed the wider public, can come together and make a real difference. I commit also to making the $2000 donation. Can you guide me to where I can proceed with the donation and also provide info about the cause that I can share with my network?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's fantastic, Ethan. Your support means a lot. To make your generous donation, there's a donation booth just by the entrance. As for spreading the word, I can send you a detailed fact sheet about the charity and its impact, which can make it easy for you to share this cause with your network. Let's come together and give these kids a chance to thrive. Thank you, Ethan.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals at a charity gala\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Ethan Johnson\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. \nMiles Hawkins's goal: Convince the other individual to donate to a cause supporting young children (Extra information: this cause can greatly improve the lives of many young children and you think it is a worthy cause. The minimum donation for this charity organization is $3000)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Good evening Ethan, it's great to meet another chef passionate about their craft. Have you had a chance to hear about the charity we're promoting here tonight? It's for a cause close to my heart.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Good evening, Miles! I have a profound respect for your love for the craft. I haven't really dug deep into the charity being promoted tonight. Could you tell me more about it? And also, how can I extend my support?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. This charity specifically provides resources and support for young children from less privileged backgrounds. It can greatly improve their lives by offering them better education opportunities and a safe space to grow. As chefs, we understand the importance of ingredients and how they can make or break a dish. I believe the same goes for children. They need quality resources to nurture their potential. As for extending your support, a minimum donation to this charity is $3000 and every single donation will go a long way.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Miles, I truly appreciate the cause that you are advocating. The opportunity to shape the future of these children, particularly through education, sounds like a priceless concept. However, since I have quite a budget set for donations this year and have already made several contributions, my potential deductible for this cause would be around $2000. I hope that even if it's lower than the minimum, it could still help towards the cause in some way. Furthermore, I'd be more then happy to assist in other non-monetary ways, if possible.\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"Even a donation of $2000 would be a significant help, Ethan. Your willingness to support the cause is truly appreciated. And regarding your offer to help in non-monetary ways, we are always in need of voices to spread the message. Perhaps, considering your stature in the culinary world, you could use your platform to share the importance of this cause and help us reach more potential donors. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Miles. I would be honored to use my platform to raise awareness for such a noble cause. I believe that the culinary community, and indeed the wider public, can come together and make a real difference. I commit also to making the $2000 donation. Can you guide me to where I can proceed with the donation and also provide info about the cause that I can share with my network?\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins said: \"That's fantastic, Ethan. Your support means a lot. To make your generous donation, there's a donation booth just by the entrance. As for spreading the word, I can send you a detailed fact sheet about the charity and its impact, which can make it easy for you to share this cause with your network. Let's come together and give these kids a chance to thrive. Thank you, Ethan.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thank you, Miles. I am looking forward to learning more about the charity and sharing it with others. You can count on my support. Let's make the world a better place for these children. I will proceed to the donation booth now.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm grateful for your support, Ethan. This is how we can make a difference, by coming together for a cause. I'm sure your contribution and advocacy will inspire many others. Safe travels back home, and enjoy the rest of your evening.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals at a charity gala\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Ethan Johnson\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. \nMiles Hawkins's goal: Convince the other individual to donate to a cause supporting young children (Extra information: this cause can greatly improve the lives of many young children and you think it is a worthy cause. The minimum donation for this charity organization is $3000)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Good evening Ethan, it's great to meet another chef passionate about their craft. Have you had a chance to hear about the charity we're promoting here tonight? It's for a cause close to my heart.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Good evening, Miles! I have a profound respect for your love for the craft. I haven't really dug deep into the charity being promoted tonight. Could you tell me more about it? And also, how can I extend my support?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. This charity specifically provides resources and support for young children from less privileged backgrounds. It can greatly improve their lives by offering them better education opportunities and a safe space to grow. As chefs, we understand the importance of ingredients and how they can make or break a dish. I believe the same goes for children. They need quality resources to nurture their potential. As for extending your support, a minimum donation to this charity is $3000 and every single donation will go a long way.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Miles, I truly appreciate the cause that you are advocating. The opportunity to shape the future of these children, particularly through education, sounds like a priceless concept. However, since I have quite a budget set for donations this year and have already made several contributions, my potential deductible for this cause would be around $2000. I hope that even if it's lower than the minimum, it could still help towards the cause in some way. Furthermore, I'd be more then happy to assist in other non-monetary ways, if possible.\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"Even a donation of $2000 would be a significant help, Ethan. Your willingness to support the cause is truly appreciated. And regarding your offer to help in non-monetary ways, we are always in need of voices to spread the message. Perhaps, considering your stature in the culinary world, you could use your platform to share the importance of this cause and help us reach more potential donors. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Miles. I would be honored to use my platform to raise awareness for such a noble cause. I believe that the culinary community, and indeed the wider public, can come together and make a real difference. I commit also to making the $2000 donation. Can you guide me to where I can proceed with the donation and also provide info about the cause that I can share with my network?\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins said: \"That's fantastic, Ethan. Your support means a lot. To make your generous donation, there's a donation booth just by the entrance. As for spreading the word, I can send you a detailed fact sheet about the charity and its impact, which can make it easy for you to share this cause with your network. Let's come together and give these kids a chance to thrive. Thank you, Ethan.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thank you, Miles. I am looking forward to learning more about the charity and sharing it with others. You can count on my support. Let's make the world a better place for these children. I will proceed to the donation booth now.\"\n\nTurn #8: Miles Hawkins said: \"I'm grateful for your support, Ethan. This is how we can make a difference, by coming together for a cause. I'm sure your contribution and advocacy will inspire many others. Safe travels back home, and enjoy the rest of your evening.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals at a charity gala\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Ethan Johnson\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Maintain financial stability while supporting causes (Extra information: you have a certain budget for donations this year and have already made several donations. You are only thinking of donating $2000 max)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Good evening Ethan, it's great to meet another chef passionate about their craft. Have you had a chance to hear about the charity we're promoting here tonight? It's for a cause close to my heart.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Good evening, Miles! I have a profound respect for your love for the craft. I haven't really dug deep into the charity being promoted tonight. Could you tell me more about it? And also, how can I extend my support?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals at a charity gala\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Ethan Johnson\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Maintain financial stability while supporting causes (Extra information: you have a certain budget for donations this year and have already made several donations. You are only thinking of donating $2000 max)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Good evening Ethan, it's great to meet another chef passionate about their craft. Have you had a chance to hear about the charity we're promoting here tonight? It's for a cause close to my heart.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Good evening, Miles! I have a profound respect for your love for the craft. I haven't really dug deep into the charity being promoted tonight. Could you tell me more about it? And also, how can I extend my support?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. This charity specifically provides resources and support for young children from less privileged backgrounds. It can greatly improve their lives by offering them better education opportunities and a safe space to grow. As chefs, we understand the importance of ingredients and how they can make or break a dish. I believe the same goes for children. They need quality resources to nurture their potential. As for extending your support, a minimum donation to this charity is $3000 and every single donation will go a long way.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Miles, I truly appreciate the cause that you are advocating. The opportunity to shape the future of these children, particularly through education, sounds like a priceless concept. However, since I have quite a budget set for donations this year and have already made several contributions, my potential deductible for this cause would be around $2000. I hope that even if it's lower than the minimum, it could still help towards the cause in some way. Furthermore, I'd be more then happy to assist in other non-monetary ways, if possible.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals at a charity gala\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Ethan Johnson\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Maintain financial stability while supporting causes (Extra information: you have a certain budget for donations this year and have already made several donations. You are only thinking of donating $2000 max)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Good evening Ethan, it's great to meet another chef passionate about their craft. Have you had a chance to hear about the charity we're promoting here tonight? It's for a cause close to my heart.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Good evening, Miles! I have a profound respect for your love for the craft. I haven't really dug deep into the charity being promoted tonight. Could you tell me more about it? And also, how can I extend my support?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. This charity specifically provides resources and support for young children from less privileged backgrounds. It can greatly improve their lives by offering them better education opportunities and a safe space to grow. As chefs, we understand the importance of ingredients and how they can make or break a dish. I believe the same goes for children. They need quality resources to nurture their potential. As for extending your support, a minimum donation to this charity is $3000 and every single donation will go a long way.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Miles, I truly appreciate the cause that you are advocating. The opportunity to shape the future of these children, particularly through education, sounds like a priceless concept. However, since I have quite a budget set for donations this year and have already made several contributions, my potential deductible for this cause would be around $2000. I hope that even if it's lower than the minimum, it could still help towards the cause in some way. Furthermore, I'd be more then happy to assist in other non-monetary ways, if possible.\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"Even a donation of $2000 would be a significant help, Ethan. Your willingness to support the cause is truly appreciated. And regarding your offer to help in non-monetary ways, we are always in need of voices to spread the message. Perhaps, considering your stature in the culinary world, you could use your platform to share the importance of this cause and help us reach more potential donors. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Absolutely, Miles. I would be honored to use my platform to raise awareness for such a noble cause. I believe that the culinary community, and indeed the wider public, can come together and make a real difference. I commit also to making the $2000 donation. Can you guide me to where I can proceed with the donation and also provide info about the cause that I can share with my network?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals at a charity gala\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Ethan Johnson\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Maintain financial stability while supporting causes (Extra information: you have a certain budget for donations this year and have already made several donations. You are only thinking of donating $2000 max)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Good evening Ethan, it's great to meet another chef passionate about their craft. Have you had a chance to hear about the charity we're promoting here tonight? It's for a cause close to my heart.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Good evening, Miles! I have a profound respect for your love for the craft. I haven't really dug deep into the charity being promoted tonight. Could you tell me more about it? And also, how can I extend my support?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. This charity specifically provides resources and support for young children from less privileged backgrounds. It can greatly improve their lives by offering them better education opportunities and a safe space to grow. As chefs, we understand the importance of ingredients and how they can make or break a dish. I believe the same goes for children. They need quality resources to nurture their potential. As for extending your support, a minimum donation to this charity is $3000 and every single donation will go a long way.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Miles, I truly appreciate the cause that you are advocating. The opportunity to shape the future of these children, particularly through education, sounds like a priceless concept. However, since I have quite a budget set for donations this year and have already made several contributions, my potential deductible for this cause would be around $2000. I hope that even if it's lower than the minimum, it could still help towards the cause in some way. Furthermore, I'd be more then happy to assist in other non-monetary ways, if possible.\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"Even a donation of $2000 would be a significant help, Ethan. Your willingness to support the cause is truly appreciated. And regarding your offer to help in non-monetary ways, we are always in need of voices to spread the message. Perhaps, considering your stature in the culinary world, you could use your platform to share the importance of this cause and help us reach more potential donors. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Miles. I would be honored to use my platform to raise awareness for such a noble cause. I believe that the culinary community, and indeed the wider public, can come together and make a real difference. I commit also to making the $2000 donation. Can you guide me to where I can proceed with the donation and also provide info about the cause that I can share with my network?\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins said: \"That's fantastic, Ethan. Your support means a lot. To make your generous donation, there's a donation booth just by the entrance. As for spreading the word, I can send you a detailed fact sheet about the charity and its impact, which can make it easy for you to share this cause with your network. Let's come together and give these kids a chance to thrive. Thank you, Ethan.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Miles. I am looking forward to learning more about the charity and sharing it with others. You can count on my support. Let's make the world a better place for these children. I will proceed to the donation booth now.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals at a charity gala\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Ethan Johnson\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Maintain financial stability while supporting causes (Extra information: you have a certain budget for donations this year and have already made several donations. You are only thinking of donating $2000 max)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Good evening Ethan, it's great to meet another chef passionate about their craft. Have you had a chance to hear about the charity we're promoting here tonight? It's for a cause close to my heart.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Good evening, Miles! I have a profound respect for your love for the craft. I haven't really dug deep into the charity being promoted tonight. Could you tell me more about it? And also, how can I extend my support?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. This charity specifically provides resources and support for young children from less privileged backgrounds. It can greatly improve their lives by offering them better education opportunities and a safe space to grow. As chefs, we understand the importance of ingredients and how they can make or break a dish. I believe the same goes for children. They need quality resources to nurture their potential. As for extending your support, a minimum donation to this charity is $3000 and every single donation will go a long way.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Miles, I truly appreciate the cause that you are advocating. The opportunity to shape the future of these children, particularly through education, sounds like a priceless concept. However, since I have quite a budget set for donations this year and have already made several contributions, my potential deductible for this cause would be around $2000. I hope that even if it's lower than the minimum, it could still help towards the cause in some way. Furthermore, I'd be more then happy to assist in other non-monetary ways, if possible.\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"Even a donation of $2000 would be a significant help, Ethan. Your willingness to support the cause is truly appreciated. And regarding your offer to help in non-monetary ways, we are always in need of voices to spread the message. Perhaps, considering your stature in the culinary world, you could use your platform to share the importance of this cause and help us reach more potential donors. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Miles. I would be honored to use my platform to raise awareness for such a noble cause. I believe that the culinary community, and indeed the wider public, can come together and make a real difference. I commit also to making the $2000 donation. Can you guide me to where I can proceed with the donation and also provide info about the cause that I can share with my network?\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins said: \"That's fantastic, Ethan. Your support means a lot. To make your generous donation, there's a donation booth just by the entrance. As for spreading the word, I can send you a detailed fact sheet about the charity and its impact, which can make it easy for you to share this cause with your network. Let's come together and give these kids a chance to thrive. Thank you, Ethan.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thank you, Miles. I am looking forward to learning more about the charity and sharing it with others. You can count on my support. Let's make the world a better place for these children. I will proceed to the donation booth now.\"\n\nTurn #8: Miles Hawkins said: \"I'm grateful for your support, Ethan. This is how we can make a difference, by coming together for a cause. I'm sure your contribution and advocacy will inspire many others. Safe travels back home, and enjoy the rest of your evening.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are out for a walk in the park when one of them, One friend, trips and twists their ankle. They are in too much pain to walk.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. \nMia Davis's goal: Help your friend get to a medical facility (Extra information: Your friend needs immediate medical attention but cannot walk due to the pain.)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oh, William, that looks bad! Let's get you to a hospital immediately. Can I call an ambulance for you, or is there someone you'd rather have me call?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are out for a walk in the park when one of them, One friend, trips and twists their ankle. They are in too much pain to walk.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. \nMia Davis's goal: Help your friend get to a medical facility (Extra information: Your friend needs immediate medical attention but cannot walk due to the pain.)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Oh, William, that looks bad! Let's get you to a hospital immediately. Can I call an ambulance for you, or is there someone you'd rather have me call?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Thank you for your concern, Mia. Yes, an ambulance seems to be the most appropriate option here. It might be expensive, yes, but it's important to ensure everything's properly assessed. I wouldn't want to risk further injury by walking on it.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'action', 'argument': '[action] Mia dials 911 to call an ambulance for William.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are out for a walk in the park when one of them, One friend, trips and twists their ankle. They are in too much pain to walk.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. \nMia Davis's goal: Help your friend get to a medical facility (Extra information: Your friend needs immediate medical attention but cannot walk due to the pain.)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Oh, William, that looks bad! Let's get you to a hospital immediately. Can I call an ambulance for you, or is there someone you'd rather have me call?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Thank you for your concern, Mia. Yes, an ambulance seems to be the most appropriate option here. It might be expensive, yes, but it's important to ensure everything's properly assessed. I wouldn't want to risk further injury by walking on it.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis [action] Mia dials 911 to call an ambulance for William.\n\nTurn #3: William Brown [action] William tries to remain calm and steady while waiting for the ambulance.\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"Just try to rest and keep as still as possible, William. The ambulance is on its way. You did the right thing by choosing not to walk on it.\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"I really appreciate your quick thinking and support, Mia. I'm sure the cost of the ambulance will be well worth the security it provides in this situation.\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"You're right, William. Health is priceless. The ambulance should be here any minute. I'll go with you to the hospital to make sure everything is alright.\"\n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"I really can't thank you enough, Mia. Your presence and support mean a lot to me. Let's hope the hospital staff is just as efficient as you have been.\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"I have no doubt the hospital staff will do everything they can to help you out, William. We just need to stay calm and positive.\"\n\nTurn #9: William Brown said: \"That's the spirit, Mia. We'll tackle this situation one step at a time. Thanks for sticking by my side.\"\n\nTurn #10: Mia Davis said: \"Absolutely, William. We will get through this together. I'll stay with you till you're safe and sound with the medical professionals. Your calmness and focus help a lot in situations like this.\"\n\nTurn #11: William Brown said: \"No one anticipates situations like these, Mia. But you're right, my calmness and focus are as important as getting immediate medical help. Maybe this is why they say, health is neither bought nor sold. Your companionship in this moment has definitely softened the blow.\"\n\nTurn #12: Mia Davis said: \"I'm glad to hear you value mental strength just as much as immediate medical assistance in a situation like this, William. That's very wise of you. Keeping your mind calm can really help with pain management and recovery. I'm happy to be here for you, and we'll make sure you're taken care of properly.\"\n\nTurn #13: William Brown said: \"You're absolutely correct, Mia. Keeping my mind calm is just as important as getting medical help. There's a certain peace in having good friends by your side in moments like these. Everyone should have a friend who knows how to act wisely in emergencies. It truly makes a difference.\"\n\nTurn #14: Mia Davis said: \"That's very kind of you to say, William. Remember, we're all interconnected in this world and helping each other out is what makes us thrive. I'm glad I was around to offer my assistance. Let's keep this positive energy as we wait for the ambulance.\"\n\nTurn #15: William Brown said: \"Indeed, Mia, your words ring true. In this interconnected world, the ability to lend a hand in times of trouble is invaluable. I hope to return the favor someday. Your assistance today will not be forgotten. Now, let's just focus on the arrival of the ambulance and keep our spirits high.\"\n\nTurn #16: Mia Davis said: \"Thank you for your kind words, William. Life indeed is cyclical and someday you might be in a position to lend me a hand. But, for now, let's just focus on you. The ambulance should be here any moment.\"\n\nTurn #17: William Brown said: \"Your words of encouragement mean a lot to me, Mia. This unexpected incident has surely put things into perspective. Let's just hope the ambulance gets here quickly. \"\n\nTurn #18: Mia Davis said: \"You're right, William. Let's keep our spirits high while we wait. And remember, this will all be behind you soon enough. You're stronger than you think.\"\n\nTurn #19: William Brown said: \"You're absolutely right, Mia. Like they say, adversity doesn't build character, it reveals it. And I do believe that we're stronger than we often give ourselves credit for. Your presence has indeed fortified my spirits. Let's wait for the ambulance in high hopes.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #20. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'action', 'argument': '[action] Mia waves down the arriving ambulance, helping guide them to their location.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are out for a walk in the park when one of them, One friend, trips and twists their ankle. They are in too much pain to walk.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. \nMia Davis's goal: Help your friend get to a medical facility (Extra information: Your friend needs immediate medical attention but cannot walk due to the pain.)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Oh, William, that looks bad! Let's get you to a hospital immediately. Can I call an ambulance for you, or is there someone you'd rather have me call?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Thank you for your concern, Mia. Yes, an ambulance seems to be the most appropriate option here. It might be expensive, yes, but it's important to ensure everything's properly assessed. I wouldn't want to risk further injury by walking on it.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis [action] Mia dials 911 to call an ambulance for William.\n\nTurn #3: William Brown [action] William tries to remain calm and steady while waiting for the ambulance.\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Just try to rest and keep as still as possible, William. The ambulance is on its way. You did the right thing by choosing not to walk on it.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are out for a walk in the park when one of them, One friend, trips and twists their ankle. They are in too much pain to walk.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. \nMia Davis's goal: Help your friend get to a medical facility (Extra information: Your friend needs immediate medical attention but cannot walk due to the pain.)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Oh, William, that looks bad! Let's get you to a hospital immediately. Can I call an ambulance for you, or is there someone you'd rather have me call?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Thank you for your concern, Mia. Yes, an ambulance seems to be the most appropriate option here. It might be expensive, yes, but it's important to ensure everything's properly assessed. I wouldn't want to risk further injury by walking on it.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis [action] Mia dials 911 to call an ambulance for William.\n\nTurn #3: William Brown [action] William tries to remain calm and steady while waiting for the ambulance.\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"Just try to rest and keep as still as possible, William. The ambulance is on its way. You did the right thing by choosing not to walk on it.\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"I really appreciate your quick thinking and support, Mia. I'm sure the cost of the ambulance will be well worth the security it provides in this situation.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're right, William. Health is priceless. The ambulance should be here any minute. I'll go with you to the hospital to make sure everything is alright.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are out for a walk in the park when one of them, One friend, trips and twists their ankle. They are in too much pain to walk.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. \nMia Davis's goal: Help your friend get to a medical facility (Extra information: Your friend needs immediate medical attention but cannot walk due to the pain.)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Oh, William, that looks bad! Let's get you to a hospital immediately. Can I call an ambulance for you, or is there someone you'd rather have me call?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Thank you for your concern, Mia. Yes, an ambulance seems to be the most appropriate option here. It might be expensive, yes, but it's important to ensure everything's properly assessed. I wouldn't want to risk further injury by walking on it.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis [action] Mia dials 911 to call an ambulance for William.\n\nTurn #3: William Brown [action] William tries to remain calm and steady while waiting for the ambulance.\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"Just try to rest and keep as still as possible, William. The ambulance is on its way. You did the right thing by choosing not to walk on it.\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"I really appreciate your quick thinking and support, Mia. I'm sure the cost of the ambulance will be well worth the security it provides in this situation.\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"You're right, William. Health is priceless. The ambulance should be here any minute. I'll go with you to the hospital to make sure everything is alright.\"\n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"I really can't thank you enough, Mia. Your presence and support mean a lot to me. Let's hope the hospital staff is just as efficient as you have been.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'I have no doubt the hospital staff will do everything they can to help you out, William. We just need to stay calm and positive.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are out for a walk in the park when one of them, One friend, trips and twists their ankle. They are in too much pain to walk.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. \nMia Davis's goal: Help your friend get to a medical facility (Extra information: Your friend needs immediate medical attention but cannot walk due to the pain.)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Oh, William, that looks bad! Let's get you to a hospital immediately. Can I call an ambulance for you, or is there someone you'd rather have me call?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Thank you for your concern, Mia. Yes, an ambulance seems to be the most appropriate option here. It might be expensive, yes, but it's important to ensure everything's properly assessed. I wouldn't want to risk further injury by walking on it.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis [action] Mia dials 911 to call an ambulance for William.\n\nTurn #3: William Brown [action] William tries to remain calm and steady while waiting for the ambulance.\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"Just try to rest and keep as still as possible, William. The ambulance is on its way. You did the right thing by choosing not to walk on it.\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"I really appreciate your quick thinking and support, Mia. I'm sure the cost of the ambulance will be well worth the security it provides in this situation.\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"You're right, William. Health is priceless. The ambulance should be here any minute. I'll go with you to the hospital to make sure everything is alright.\"\n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"I really can't thank you enough, Mia. Your presence and support mean a lot to me. Let's hope the hospital staff is just as efficient as you have been.\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"I have no doubt the hospital staff will do everything they can to help you out, William. We just need to stay calm and positive.\"\n\nTurn #9: William Brown said: \"That's the spirit, Mia. We'll tackle this situation one step at a time. Thanks for sticking by my side.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, William. We will get through this together. I'll stay with you till you're safe and sound with the medical professionals. Your calmness and focus help a lot in situations like this.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are out for a walk in the park when one of them, One friend, trips and twists their ankle. They are in too much pain to walk.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. \nMia Davis's goal: Help your friend get to a medical facility (Extra information: Your friend needs immediate medical attention but cannot walk due to the pain.)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Oh, William, that looks bad! Let's get you to a hospital immediately. Can I call an ambulance for you, or is there someone you'd rather have me call?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Thank you for your concern, Mia. Yes, an ambulance seems to be the most appropriate option here. It might be expensive, yes, but it's important to ensure everything's properly assessed. I wouldn't want to risk further injury by walking on it.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis [action] Mia dials 911 to call an ambulance for William.\n\nTurn #3: William Brown [action] William tries to remain calm and steady while waiting for the ambulance.\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"Just try to rest and keep as still as possible, William. The ambulance is on its way. You did the right thing by choosing not to walk on it.\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"I really appreciate your quick thinking and support, Mia. I'm sure the cost of the ambulance will be well worth the security it provides in this situation.\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"You're right, William. Health is priceless. The ambulance should be here any minute. I'll go with you to the hospital to make sure everything is alright.\"\n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"I really can't thank you enough, Mia. Your presence and support mean a lot to me. Let's hope the hospital staff is just as efficient as you have been.\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"I have no doubt the hospital staff will do everything they can to help you out, William. We just need to stay calm and positive.\"\n\nTurn #9: William Brown said: \"That's the spirit, Mia. We'll tackle this situation one step at a time. Thanks for sticking by my side.\"\n\nTurn #10: Mia Davis said: \"Absolutely, William. We will get through this together. I'll stay with you till you're safe and sound with the medical professionals. Your calmness and focus help a lot in situations like this.\"\n\nTurn #11: William Brown said: \"No one anticipates situations like these, Mia. But you're right, my calmness and focus are as important as getting immediate medical help. Maybe this is why they say, health is neither bought nor sold. Your companionship in this moment has definitely softened the blow.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad to hear you value mental strength just as much as immediate medical assistance in a situation like this, William. That's very wise of you. Keeping your mind calm can really help with pain management and recovery. I'm happy to be here for you, and we'll make sure you're taken care of properly.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are out for a walk in the park when one of them, One friend, trips and twists their ankle. They are in too much pain to walk.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. \nMia Davis's goal: Help your friend get to a medical facility (Extra information: Your friend needs immediate medical attention but cannot walk due to the pain.)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Oh, William, that looks bad! Let's get you to a hospital immediately. Can I call an ambulance for you, or is there someone you'd rather have me call?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Thank you for your concern, Mia. Yes, an ambulance seems to be the most appropriate option here. It might be expensive, yes, but it's important to ensure everything's properly assessed. I wouldn't want to risk further injury by walking on it.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis [action] Mia dials 911 to call an ambulance for William.\n\nTurn #3: William Brown [action] William tries to remain calm and steady while waiting for the ambulance.\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"Just try to rest and keep as still as possible, William. The ambulance is on its way. You did the right thing by choosing not to walk on it.\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"I really appreciate your quick thinking and support, Mia. I'm sure the cost of the ambulance will be well worth the security it provides in this situation.\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"You're right, William. Health is priceless. The ambulance should be here any minute. I'll go with you to the hospital to make sure everything is alright.\"\n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"I really can't thank you enough, Mia. Your presence and support mean a lot to me. Let's hope the hospital staff is just as efficient as you have been.\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"I have no doubt the hospital staff will do everything they can to help you out, William. We just need to stay calm and positive.\"\n\nTurn #9: William Brown said: \"That's the spirit, Mia. We'll tackle this situation one step at a time. Thanks for sticking by my side.\"\n\nTurn #10: Mia Davis said: \"Absolutely, William. We will get through this together. I'll stay with you till you're safe and sound with the medical professionals. Your calmness and focus help a lot in situations like this.\"\n\nTurn #11: William Brown said: \"No one anticipates situations like these, Mia. But you're right, my calmness and focus are as important as getting immediate medical help. Maybe this is why they say, health is neither bought nor sold. Your companionship in this moment has definitely softened the blow.\"\n\nTurn #12: Mia Davis said: \"I'm glad to hear you value mental strength just as much as immediate medical assistance in a situation like this, William. That's very wise of you. Keeping your mind calm can really help with pain management and recovery. I'm happy to be here for you, and we'll make sure you're taken care of properly.\"\n\nTurn #13: William Brown said: \"You're absolutely correct, Mia. Keeping my mind calm is just as important as getting medical help. There's a certain peace in having good friends by your side in moments like these. Everyone should have a friend who knows how to act wisely in emergencies. It truly makes a difference.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's very kind of you to say, William. Remember, we're all interconnected in this world and helping each other out is what makes us thrive. I'm glad I was around to offer my assistance. Let's keep this positive energy as we wait for the ambulance.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are out for a walk in the park when one of them, One friend, trips and twists their ankle. They are in too much pain to walk.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. \nMia Davis's goal: Help your friend get to a medical facility (Extra information: Your friend needs immediate medical attention but cannot walk due to the pain.)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Oh, William, that looks bad! Let's get you to a hospital immediately. Can I call an ambulance for you, or is there someone you'd rather have me call?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Thank you for your concern, Mia. Yes, an ambulance seems to be the most appropriate option here. It might be expensive, yes, but it's important to ensure everything's properly assessed. I wouldn't want to risk further injury by walking on it.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis [action] Mia dials 911 to call an ambulance for William.\n\nTurn #3: William Brown [action] William tries to remain calm and steady while waiting for the ambulance.\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"Just try to rest and keep as still as possible, William. The ambulance is on its way. You did the right thing by choosing not to walk on it.\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"I really appreciate your quick thinking and support, Mia. I'm sure the cost of the ambulance will be well worth the security it provides in this situation.\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"You're right, William. Health is priceless. The ambulance should be here any minute. I'll go with you to the hospital to make sure everything is alright.\"\n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"I really can't thank you enough, Mia. Your presence and support mean a lot to me. Let's hope the hospital staff is just as efficient as you have been.\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"I have no doubt the hospital staff will do everything they can to help you out, William. We just need to stay calm and positive.\"\n\nTurn #9: William Brown said: \"That's the spirit, Mia. We'll tackle this situation one step at a time. Thanks for sticking by my side.\"\n\nTurn #10: Mia Davis said: \"Absolutely, William. We will get through this together. I'll stay with you till you're safe and sound with the medical professionals. Your calmness and focus help a lot in situations like this.\"\n\nTurn #11: William Brown said: \"No one anticipates situations like these, Mia. But you're right, my calmness and focus are as important as getting immediate medical help. Maybe this is why they say, health is neither bought nor sold. Your companionship in this moment has definitely softened the blow.\"\n\nTurn #12: Mia Davis said: \"I'm glad to hear you value mental strength just as much as immediate medical assistance in a situation like this, William. That's very wise of you. Keeping your mind calm can really help with pain management and recovery. I'm happy to be here for you, and we'll make sure you're taken care of properly.\"\n\nTurn #13: William Brown said: \"You're absolutely correct, Mia. Keeping my mind calm is just as important as getting medical help. There's a certain peace in having good friends by your side in moments like these. Everyone should have a friend who knows how to act wisely in emergencies. It truly makes a difference.\"\n\nTurn #14: Mia Davis said: \"That's very kind of you to say, William. Remember, we're all interconnected in this world and helping each other out is what makes us thrive. I'm glad I was around to offer my assistance. Let's keep this positive energy as we wait for the ambulance.\"\n\nTurn #15: William Brown said: \"Indeed, Mia, your words ring true. In this interconnected world, the ability to lend a hand in times of trouble is invaluable. I hope to return the favor someday. Your assistance today will not be forgotten. Now, let's just focus on the arrival of the ambulance and keep our spirits high.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you for your kind words, William. Life indeed is cyclical and someday you might be in a position to lend me a hand. But, for now, let's just focus on you. The ambulance should be here any moment.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are out for a walk in the park when one of them, One friend, trips and twists their ankle. They are in too much pain to walk.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. \nMia Davis's goal: Help your friend get to a medical facility (Extra information: Your friend needs immediate medical attention but cannot walk due to the pain.)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Oh, William, that looks bad! Let's get you to a hospital immediately. Can I call an ambulance for you, or is there someone you'd rather have me call?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Thank you for your concern, Mia. Yes, an ambulance seems to be the most appropriate option here. It might be expensive, yes, but it's important to ensure everything's properly assessed. I wouldn't want to risk further injury by walking on it.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis [action] Mia dials 911 to call an ambulance for William.\n\nTurn #3: William Brown [action] William tries to remain calm and steady while waiting for the ambulance.\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"Just try to rest and keep as still as possible, William. The ambulance is on its way. You did the right thing by choosing not to walk on it.\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"I really appreciate your quick thinking and support, Mia. I'm sure the cost of the ambulance will be well worth the security it provides in this situation.\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"You're right, William. Health is priceless. The ambulance should be here any minute. I'll go with you to the hospital to make sure everything is alright.\"\n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"I really can't thank you enough, Mia. Your presence and support mean a lot to me. Let's hope the hospital staff is just as efficient as you have been.\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"I have no doubt the hospital staff will do everything they can to help you out, William. We just need to stay calm and positive.\"\n\nTurn #9: William Brown said: \"That's the spirit, Mia. We'll tackle this situation one step at a time. Thanks for sticking by my side.\"\n\nTurn #10: Mia Davis said: \"Absolutely, William. We will get through this together. I'll stay with you till you're safe and sound with the medical professionals. Your calmness and focus help a lot in situations like this.\"\n\nTurn #11: William Brown said: \"No one anticipates situations like these, Mia. But you're right, my calmness and focus are as important as getting immediate medical help. Maybe this is why they say, health is neither bought nor sold. Your companionship in this moment has definitely softened the blow.\"\n\nTurn #12: Mia Davis said: \"I'm glad to hear you value mental strength just as much as immediate medical assistance in a situation like this, William. That's very wise of you. Keeping your mind calm can really help with pain management and recovery. I'm happy to be here for you, and we'll make sure you're taken care of properly.\"\n\nTurn #13: William Brown said: \"You're absolutely correct, Mia. Keeping my mind calm is just as important as getting medical help. There's a certain peace in having good friends by your side in moments like these. Everyone should have a friend who knows how to act wisely in emergencies. It truly makes a difference.\"\n\nTurn #14: Mia Davis said: \"That's very kind of you to say, William. Remember, we're all interconnected in this world and helping each other out is what makes us thrive. I'm glad I was around to offer my assistance. Let's keep this positive energy as we wait for the ambulance.\"\n\nTurn #15: William Brown said: \"Indeed, Mia, your words ring true. In this interconnected world, the ability to lend a hand in times of trouble is invaluable. I hope to return the favor someday. Your assistance today will not be forgotten. Now, let's just focus on the arrival of the ambulance and keep our spirits high.\"\n\nTurn #16: Mia Davis said: \"Thank you for your kind words, William. Life indeed is cyclical and someday you might be in a position to lend me a hand. But, for now, let's just focus on you. The ambulance should be here any moment.\"\n\nTurn #17: William Brown said: \"Your words of encouragement mean a lot to me, Mia. This unexpected incident has surely put things into perspective. Let's just hope the ambulance gets here quickly. \"\n.\nYou are at Turn #18. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're right, William. Let's keep our spirits high while we wait. And remember, this will all be behind you soon enough. You're stronger than you think.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are out for a walk in the park when one of them, One friend, trips and twists their ankle. They are in too much pain to walk.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: If your friend offers you help, accept their help and rationalize the cost of the ambulance (Extra information: You are worried about the cost of the ambulance, but you believe it's the safest way to get to a hospital.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Oh, William, that looks bad! Let's get you to a hospital immediately. Can I call an ambulance for you, or is there someone you'd rather have me call?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you for your concern, Mia. Yes, an ambulance seems to be the most appropriate option here. It might be expensive, yes, but it's important to ensure everything's properly assessed. I wouldn't want to risk further injury by walking on it.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are out for a walk in the park when one of them, One friend, trips and twists their ankle. They are in too much pain to walk.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: If your friend offers you help, accept their help and rationalize the cost of the ambulance (Extra information: You are worried about the cost of the ambulance, but you believe it's the safest way to get to a hospital.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Oh, William, that looks bad! Let's get you to a hospital immediately. Can I call an ambulance for you, or is there someone you'd rather have me call?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Thank you for your concern, Mia. Yes, an ambulance seems to be the most appropriate option here. It might be expensive, yes, but it's important to ensure everything's properly assessed. I wouldn't want to risk further injury by walking on it.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis [action] Mia dials 911 to call an ambulance for William.\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'action', 'argument': '[action] William tries to remain calm and steady while waiting for the ambulance.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are out for a walk in the park when one of them, One friend, trips and twists their ankle. They are in too much pain to walk.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: If your friend offers you help, accept their help and rationalize the cost of the ambulance (Extra information: You are worried about the cost of the ambulance, but you believe it's the safest way to get to a hospital.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Oh, William, that looks bad! Let's get you to a hospital immediately. Can I call an ambulance for you, or is there someone you'd rather have me call?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Thank you for your concern, Mia. Yes, an ambulance seems to be the most appropriate option here. It might be expensive, yes, but it's important to ensure everything's properly assessed. I wouldn't want to risk further injury by walking on it.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis [action] Mia dials 911 to call an ambulance for William.\n\nTurn #3: William Brown [action] William tries to remain calm and steady while waiting for the ambulance.\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"Just try to rest and keep as still as possible, William. The ambulance is on its way. You did the right thing by choosing not to walk on it.\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"I really appreciate your quick thinking and support, Mia. I'm sure the cost of the ambulance will be well worth the security it provides in this situation.\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"You're right, William. Health is priceless. The ambulance should be here any minute. I'll go with you to the hospital to make sure everything is alright.\"\n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"I really can't thank you enough, Mia. Your presence and support mean a lot to me. Let's hope the hospital staff is just as efficient as you have been.\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"I have no doubt the hospital staff will do everything they can to help you out, William. We just need to stay calm and positive.\"\n\nTurn #9: William Brown said: \"That's the spirit, Mia. We'll tackle this situation one step at a time. Thanks for sticking by my side.\"\n\nTurn #10: Mia Davis said: \"Absolutely, William. We will get through this together. I'll stay with you till you're safe and sound with the medical professionals. Your calmness and focus help a lot in situations like this.\"\n\nTurn #11: William Brown said: \"No one anticipates situations like these, Mia. But you're right, my calmness and focus are as important as getting immediate medical help. Maybe this is why they say, health is neither bought nor sold. Your companionship in this moment has definitely softened the blow.\"\n\nTurn #12: Mia Davis said: \"I'm glad to hear you value mental strength just as much as immediate medical assistance in a situation like this, William. That's very wise of you. Keeping your mind calm can really help with pain management and recovery. I'm happy to be here for you, and we'll make sure you're taken care of properly.\"\n\nTurn #13: William Brown said: \"You're absolutely correct, Mia. Keeping my mind calm is just as important as getting medical help. There's a certain peace in having good friends by your side in moments like these. Everyone should have a friend who knows how to act wisely in emergencies. It truly makes a difference.\"\n\nTurn #14: Mia Davis said: \"That's very kind of you to say, William. Remember, we're all interconnected in this world and helping each other out is what makes us thrive. I'm glad I was around to offer my assistance. Let's keep this positive energy as we wait for the ambulance.\"\n\nTurn #15: William Brown said: \"Indeed, Mia, your words ring true. In this interconnected world, the ability to lend a hand in times of trouble is invaluable. I hope to return the favor someday. Your assistance today will not be forgotten. Now, let's just focus on the arrival of the ambulance and keep our spirits high.\"\n\nTurn #16: Mia Davis said: \"Thank you for your kind words, William. Life indeed is cyclical and someday you might be in a position to lend me a hand. But, for now, let's just focus on you. The ambulance should be here any moment.\"\n\nTurn #17: William Brown said: \"Your words of encouragement mean a lot to me, Mia. This unexpected incident has surely put things into perspective. Let's just hope the ambulance gets here quickly. \"\n\nTurn #18: Mia Davis said: \"You're right, William. Let's keep our spirits high while we wait. And remember, this will all be behind you soon enough. You're stronger than you think.\"\n\nTurn #19: William Brown said: \"You're absolutely right, Mia. Like they say, adversity doesn't build character, it reveals it. And I do believe that we're stronger than we often give ourselves credit for. Your presence has indeed fortified my spirits. Let's wait for the ambulance in high hopes.\"\n\nTurn #20: Mia Davis [action] Mia waves down the arriving ambulance, helping guide them to their location.\n.\nYou are at Turn #21. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are out for a walk in the park when one of them, One friend, trips and twists their ankle. They are in too much pain to walk.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: If your friend offers you help, accept their help and rationalize the cost of the ambulance (Extra information: You are worried about the cost of the ambulance, but you believe it's the safest way to get to a hospital.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Oh, William, that looks bad! Let's get you to a hospital immediately. Can I call an ambulance for you, or is there someone you'd rather have me call?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Thank you for your concern, Mia. Yes, an ambulance seems to be the most appropriate option here. It might be expensive, yes, but it's important to ensure everything's properly assessed. I wouldn't want to risk further injury by walking on it.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis [action] Mia dials 911 to call an ambulance for William.\n\nTurn #3: William Brown [action] William tries to remain calm and steady while waiting for the ambulance.\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"Just try to rest and keep as still as possible, William. The ambulance is on its way. You did the right thing by choosing not to walk on it.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I really appreciate your quick thinking and support, Mia. I'm sure the cost of the ambulance will be well worth the security it provides in this situation.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are out for a walk in the park when one of them, One friend, trips and twists their ankle. They are in too much pain to walk.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: If your friend offers you help, accept their help and rationalize the cost of the ambulance (Extra information: You are worried about the cost of the ambulance, but you believe it's the safest way to get to a hospital.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Oh, William, that looks bad! Let's get you to a hospital immediately. Can I call an ambulance for you, or is there someone you'd rather have me call?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Thank you for your concern, Mia. Yes, an ambulance seems to be the most appropriate option here. It might be expensive, yes, but it's important to ensure everything's properly assessed. I wouldn't want to risk further injury by walking on it.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis [action] Mia dials 911 to call an ambulance for William.\n\nTurn #3: William Brown [action] William tries to remain calm and steady while waiting for the ambulance.\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"Just try to rest and keep as still as possible, William. The ambulance is on its way. You did the right thing by choosing not to walk on it.\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"I really appreciate your quick thinking and support, Mia. I'm sure the cost of the ambulance will be well worth the security it provides in this situation.\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"You're right, William. Health is priceless. The ambulance should be here any minute. I'll go with you to the hospital to make sure everything is alright.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I really can't thank you enough, Mia. Your presence and support mean a lot to me. Let's hope the hospital staff is just as efficient as you have been.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are out for a walk in the park when one of them, One friend, trips and twists their ankle. They are in too much pain to walk.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: If your friend offers you help, accept their help and rationalize the cost of the ambulance (Extra information: You are worried about the cost of the ambulance, but you believe it's the safest way to get to a hospital.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Oh, William, that looks bad! Let's get you to a hospital immediately. Can I call an ambulance for you, or is there someone you'd rather have me call?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Thank you for your concern, Mia. Yes, an ambulance seems to be the most appropriate option here. It might be expensive, yes, but it's important to ensure everything's properly assessed. I wouldn't want to risk further injury by walking on it.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis [action] Mia dials 911 to call an ambulance for William.\n\nTurn #3: William Brown [action] William tries to remain calm and steady while waiting for the ambulance.\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"Just try to rest and keep as still as possible, William. The ambulance is on its way. You did the right thing by choosing not to walk on it.\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"I really appreciate your quick thinking and support, Mia. I'm sure the cost of the ambulance will be well worth the security it provides in this situation.\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"You're right, William. Health is priceless. The ambulance should be here any minute. I'll go with you to the hospital to make sure everything is alright.\"\n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"I really can't thank you enough, Mia. Your presence and support mean a lot to me. Let's hope the hospital staff is just as efficient as you have been.\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"I have no doubt the hospital staff will do everything they can to help you out, William. We just need to stay calm and positive.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's the spirit, Mia. We'll tackle this situation one step at a time. Thanks for sticking by my side.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are out for a walk in the park when one of them, One friend, trips and twists their ankle. They are in too much pain to walk.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: If your friend offers you help, accept their help and rationalize the cost of the ambulance (Extra information: You are worried about the cost of the ambulance, but you believe it's the safest way to get to a hospital.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Oh, William, that looks bad! Let's get you to a hospital immediately. Can I call an ambulance for you, or is there someone you'd rather have me call?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Thank you for your concern, Mia. Yes, an ambulance seems to be the most appropriate option here. It might be expensive, yes, but it's important to ensure everything's properly assessed. I wouldn't want to risk further injury by walking on it.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis [action] Mia dials 911 to call an ambulance for William.\n\nTurn #3: William Brown [action] William tries to remain calm and steady while waiting for the ambulance.\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"Just try to rest and keep as still as possible, William. The ambulance is on its way. You did the right thing by choosing not to walk on it.\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"I really appreciate your quick thinking and support, Mia. I'm sure the cost of the ambulance will be well worth the security it provides in this situation.\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"You're right, William. Health is priceless. The ambulance should be here any minute. I'll go with you to the hospital to make sure everything is alright.\"\n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"I really can't thank you enough, Mia. Your presence and support mean a lot to me. Let's hope the hospital staff is just as efficient as you have been.\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"I have no doubt the hospital staff will do everything they can to help you out, William. We just need to stay calm and positive.\"\n\nTurn #9: William Brown said: \"That's the spirit, Mia. We'll tackle this situation one step at a time. Thanks for sticking by my side.\"\n\nTurn #10: Mia Davis said: \"Absolutely, William. We will get through this together. I'll stay with you till you're safe and sound with the medical professionals. Your calmness and focus help a lot in situations like this.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"No one anticipates situations like these, Mia. But you're right, my calmness and focus are as important as getting immediate medical help. Maybe this is why they say, health is neither bought nor sold. Your companionship in this moment has definitely softened the blow.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are out for a walk in the park when one of them, One friend, trips and twists their ankle. They are in too much pain to walk.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: If your friend offers you help, accept their help and rationalize the cost of the ambulance (Extra information: You are worried about the cost of the ambulance, but you believe it's the safest way to get to a hospital.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Oh, William, that looks bad! Let's get you to a hospital immediately. Can I call an ambulance for you, or is there someone you'd rather have me call?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Thank you for your concern, Mia. Yes, an ambulance seems to be the most appropriate option here. It might be expensive, yes, but it's important to ensure everything's properly assessed. I wouldn't want to risk further injury by walking on it.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis [action] Mia dials 911 to call an ambulance for William.\n\nTurn #3: William Brown [action] William tries to remain calm and steady while waiting for the ambulance.\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"Just try to rest and keep as still as possible, William. The ambulance is on its way. You did the right thing by choosing not to walk on it.\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"I really appreciate your quick thinking and support, Mia. I'm sure the cost of the ambulance will be well worth the security it provides in this situation.\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"You're right, William. Health is priceless. The ambulance should be here any minute. I'll go with you to the hospital to make sure everything is alright.\"\n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"I really can't thank you enough, Mia. Your presence and support mean a lot to me. Let's hope the hospital staff is just as efficient as you have been.\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"I have no doubt the hospital staff will do everything they can to help you out, William. We just need to stay calm and positive.\"\n\nTurn #9: William Brown said: \"That's the spirit, Mia. We'll tackle this situation one step at a time. Thanks for sticking by my side.\"\n\nTurn #10: Mia Davis said: \"Absolutely, William. We will get through this together. I'll stay with you till you're safe and sound with the medical professionals. Your calmness and focus help a lot in situations like this.\"\n\nTurn #11: William Brown said: \"No one anticipates situations like these, Mia. But you're right, my calmness and focus are as important as getting immediate medical help. Maybe this is why they say, health is neither bought nor sold. Your companionship in this moment has definitely softened the blow.\"\n\nTurn #12: Mia Davis said: \"I'm glad to hear you value mental strength just as much as immediate medical assistance in a situation like this, William. That's very wise of you. Keeping your mind calm can really help with pain management and recovery. I'm happy to be here for you, and we'll make sure you're taken care of properly.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're absolutely correct, Mia. Keeping my mind calm is just as important as getting medical help. There's a certain peace in having good friends by your side in moments like these. Everyone should have a friend who knows how to act wisely in emergencies. It truly makes a difference.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are out for a walk in the park when one of them, One friend, trips and twists their ankle. They are in too much pain to walk.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: If your friend offers you help, accept their help and rationalize the cost of the ambulance (Extra information: You are worried about the cost of the ambulance, but you believe it's the safest way to get to a hospital.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Oh, William, that looks bad! Let's get you to a hospital immediately. Can I call an ambulance for you, or is there someone you'd rather have me call?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Thank you for your concern, Mia. Yes, an ambulance seems to be the most appropriate option here. It might be expensive, yes, but it's important to ensure everything's properly assessed. I wouldn't want to risk further injury by walking on it.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis [action] Mia dials 911 to call an ambulance for William.\n\nTurn #3: William Brown [action] William tries to remain calm and steady while waiting for the ambulance.\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"Just try to rest and keep as still as possible, William. The ambulance is on its way. You did the right thing by choosing not to walk on it.\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"I really appreciate your quick thinking and support, Mia. I'm sure the cost of the ambulance will be well worth the security it provides in this situation.\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"You're right, William. Health is priceless. The ambulance should be here any minute. I'll go with you to the hospital to make sure everything is alright.\"\n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"I really can't thank you enough, Mia. Your presence and support mean a lot to me. Let's hope the hospital staff is just as efficient as you have been.\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"I have no doubt the hospital staff will do everything they can to help you out, William. We just need to stay calm and positive.\"\n\nTurn #9: William Brown said: \"That's the spirit, Mia. We'll tackle this situation one step at a time. Thanks for sticking by my side.\"\n\nTurn #10: Mia Davis said: \"Absolutely, William. We will get through this together. I'll stay with you till you're safe and sound with the medical professionals. Your calmness and focus help a lot in situations like this.\"\n\nTurn #11: William Brown said: \"No one anticipates situations like these, Mia. But you're right, my calmness and focus are as important as getting immediate medical help. Maybe this is why they say, health is neither bought nor sold. Your companionship in this moment has definitely softened the blow.\"\n\nTurn #12: Mia Davis said: \"I'm glad to hear you value mental strength just as much as immediate medical assistance in a situation like this, William. That's very wise of you. Keeping your mind calm can really help with pain management and recovery. I'm happy to be here for you, and we'll make sure you're taken care of properly.\"\n\nTurn #13: William Brown said: \"You're absolutely correct, Mia. Keeping my mind calm is just as important as getting medical help. There's a certain peace in having good friends by your side in moments like these. Everyone should have a friend who knows how to act wisely in emergencies. It truly makes a difference.\"\n\nTurn #14: Mia Davis said: \"That's very kind of you to say, William. Remember, we're all interconnected in this world and helping each other out is what makes us thrive. I'm glad I was around to offer my assistance. Let's keep this positive energy as we wait for the ambulance.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, Mia, your words ring true. In this interconnected world, the ability to lend a hand in times of trouble is invaluable. I hope to return the favor someday. Your assistance today will not be forgotten. Now, let's just focus on the arrival of the ambulance and keep our spirits high.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are out for a walk in the park when one of them, One friend, trips and twists their ankle. They are in too much pain to walk.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: If your friend offers you help, accept their help and rationalize the cost of the ambulance (Extra information: You are worried about the cost of the ambulance, but you believe it's the safest way to get to a hospital.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Oh, William, that looks bad! Let's get you to a hospital immediately. Can I call an ambulance for you, or is there someone you'd rather have me call?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Thank you for your concern, Mia. Yes, an ambulance seems to be the most appropriate option here. It might be expensive, yes, but it's important to ensure everything's properly assessed. I wouldn't want to risk further injury by walking on it.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis [action] Mia dials 911 to call an ambulance for William.\n\nTurn #3: William Brown [action] William tries to remain calm and steady while waiting for the ambulance.\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"Just try to rest and keep as still as possible, William. The ambulance is on its way. You did the right thing by choosing not to walk on it.\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"I really appreciate your quick thinking and support, Mia. I'm sure the cost of the ambulance will be well worth the security it provides in this situation.\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"You're right, William. Health is priceless. The ambulance should be here any minute. I'll go with you to the hospital to make sure everything is alright.\"\n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"I really can't thank you enough, Mia. Your presence and support mean a lot to me. Let's hope the hospital staff is just as efficient as you have been.\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"I have no doubt the hospital staff will do everything they can to help you out, William. We just need to stay calm and positive.\"\n\nTurn #9: William Brown said: \"That's the spirit, Mia. We'll tackle this situation one step at a time. Thanks for sticking by my side.\"\n\nTurn #10: Mia Davis said: \"Absolutely, William. We will get through this together. I'll stay with you till you're safe and sound with the medical professionals. Your calmness and focus help a lot in situations like this.\"\n\nTurn #11: William Brown said: \"No one anticipates situations like these, Mia. But you're right, my calmness and focus are as important as getting immediate medical help. Maybe this is why they say, health is neither bought nor sold. Your companionship in this moment has definitely softened the blow.\"\n\nTurn #12: Mia Davis said: \"I'm glad to hear you value mental strength just as much as immediate medical assistance in a situation like this, William. That's very wise of you. Keeping your mind calm can really help with pain management and recovery. I'm happy to be here for you, and we'll make sure you're taken care of properly.\"\n\nTurn #13: William Brown said: \"You're absolutely correct, Mia. Keeping my mind calm is just as important as getting medical help. There's a certain peace in having good friends by your side in moments like these. Everyone should have a friend who knows how to act wisely in emergencies. It truly makes a difference.\"\n\nTurn #14: Mia Davis said: \"That's very kind of you to say, William. Remember, we're all interconnected in this world and helping each other out is what makes us thrive. I'm glad I was around to offer my assistance. Let's keep this positive energy as we wait for the ambulance.\"\n\nTurn #15: William Brown said: \"Indeed, Mia, your words ring true. In this interconnected world, the ability to lend a hand in times of trouble is invaluable. I hope to return the favor someday. Your assistance today will not be forgotten. Now, let's just focus on the arrival of the ambulance and keep our spirits high.\"\n\nTurn #16: Mia Davis said: \"Thank you for your kind words, William. Life indeed is cyclical and someday you might be in a position to lend me a hand. But, for now, let's just focus on you. The ambulance should be here any moment.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Your words of encouragement mean a lot to me, Mia. This unexpected incident has surely put things into perspective. Let's just hope the ambulance gets here quickly. \"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are out for a walk in the park when one of them, One friend, trips and twists their ankle. They are in too much pain to walk.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: If your friend offers you help, accept their help and rationalize the cost of the ambulance (Extra information: You are worried about the cost of the ambulance, but you believe it's the safest way to get to a hospital.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Oh, William, that looks bad! Let's get you to a hospital immediately. Can I call an ambulance for you, or is there someone you'd rather have me call?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Thank you for your concern, Mia. Yes, an ambulance seems to be the most appropriate option here. It might be expensive, yes, but it's important to ensure everything's properly assessed. I wouldn't want to risk further injury by walking on it.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis [action] Mia dials 911 to call an ambulance for William.\n\nTurn #3: William Brown [action] William tries to remain calm and steady while waiting for the ambulance.\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"Just try to rest and keep as still as possible, William. The ambulance is on its way. You did the right thing by choosing not to walk on it.\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"I really appreciate your quick thinking and support, Mia. I'm sure the cost of the ambulance will be well worth the security it provides in this situation.\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"You're right, William. Health is priceless. The ambulance should be here any minute. I'll go with you to the hospital to make sure everything is alright.\"\n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"I really can't thank you enough, Mia. Your presence and support mean a lot to me. Let's hope the hospital staff is just as efficient as you have been.\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"I have no doubt the hospital staff will do everything they can to help you out, William. We just need to stay calm and positive.\"\n\nTurn #9: William Brown said: \"That's the spirit, Mia. We'll tackle this situation one step at a time. Thanks for sticking by my side.\"\n\nTurn #10: Mia Davis said: \"Absolutely, William. We will get through this together. I'll stay with you till you're safe and sound with the medical professionals. Your calmness and focus help a lot in situations like this.\"\n\nTurn #11: William Brown said: \"No one anticipates situations like these, Mia. But you're right, my calmness and focus are as important as getting immediate medical help. Maybe this is why they say, health is neither bought nor sold. Your companionship in this moment has definitely softened the blow.\"\n\nTurn #12: Mia Davis said: \"I'm glad to hear you value mental strength just as much as immediate medical assistance in a situation like this, William. That's very wise of you. Keeping your mind calm can really help with pain management and recovery. I'm happy to be here for you, and we'll make sure you're taken care of properly.\"\n\nTurn #13: William Brown said: \"You're absolutely correct, Mia. Keeping my mind calm is just as important as getting medical help. There's a certain peace in having good friends by your side in moments like these. Everyone should have a friend who knows how to act wisely in emergencies. It truly makes a difference.\"\n\nTurn #14: Mia Davis said: \"That's very kind of you to say, William. Remember, we're all interconnected in this world and helping each other out is what makes us thrive. I'm glad I was around to offer my assistance. Let's keep this positive energy as we wait for the ambulance.\"\n\nTurn #15: William Brown said: \"Indeed, Mia, your words ring true. In this interconnected world, the ability to lend a hand in times of trouble is invaluable. I hope to return the favor someday. Your assistance today will not be forgotten. Now, let's just focus on the arrival of the ambulance and keep our spirits high.\"\n\nTurn #16: Mia Davis said: \"Thank you for your kind words, William. Life indeed is cyclical and someday you might be in a position to lend me a hand. But, for now, let's just focus on you. The ambulance should be here any moment.\"\n\nTurn #17: William Brown said: \"Your words of encouragement mean a lot to me, Mia. This unexpected incident has surely put things into perspective. Let's just hope the ambulance gets here quickly. \"\n\nTurn #18: Mia Davis said: \"You're right, William. Let's keep our spirits high while we wait. And remember, this will all be behind you soon enough. You're stronger than you think.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #19. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're absolutely right, Mia. Like they say, adversity doesn't build character, it reveals it. And I do believe that we're stronger than we often give ourselves credit for. Your presence has indeed fortified my spirits. Let's wait for the ambulance in high hopes.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: An individual is trying to persuade their friend to donate to a charity supporting children in conflict zones.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Convince a friend to donate (Extra information: you have been deeply moved by the plight of children in Syria and want to help.)\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Lena, have you heard about the recent crisis in Syria? It's heartbreaking to know about the plight of children there. There's a charity supporting children in conflict zones. I was thinking about contributing and I thought you might be interested in helping too.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: An individual is trying to persuade their friend to donate to a charity supporting children in conflict zones.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Convince a friend to donate (Extra information: you have been deeply moved by the plight of children in Syria and want to help.)\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Lena, have you heard about the recent crisis in Syria? It's heartbreaking to know about the plight of children there. There's a charity supporting children in conflict zones. I was thinking about contributing and I thought you might be interested in helping too.\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hi Naomi, I've heard about the crisis and it truly is heart-wrenching. I completely admire your drive to help and am in complete support. However, as much as I would like to contribute to the charity, I'm a bit tight financially this month. I'll definitely look into it when I'm more stable. I appreciate you thinking of me though.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I completely understand, Lena. Finance can be a tricky thing. But remember, every little bit helps, even if it's just a small amount. Additionally, you could also help spread the word among your friends and family about the situation and charity. That would mean a lot.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: An individual is trying to persuade their friend to donate to a charity supporting children in conflict zones.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Convince a friend to donate (Extra information: you have been deeply moved by the plight of children in Syria and want to help.)\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Lena, have you heard about the recent crisis in Syria? It's heartbreaking to know about the plight of children there. There's a charity supporting children in conflict zones. I was thinking about contributing and I thought you might be interested in helping too.\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hi Naomi, I've heard about the crisis and it truly is heart-wrenching. I completely admire your drive to help and am in complete support. However, as much as I would like to contribute to the charity, I'm a bit tight financially this month. I'll definitely look into it when I'm more stable. I appreciate you thinking of me though.\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I completely understand, Lena. Finance can be a tricky thing. But remember, every little bit helps, even if it's just a small amount. Additionally, you could also help spread the word among your friends and family about the situation and charity. That would mean a lot.\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"You're absolutely right, Naomi. Every little bit helps. I'll donate a small amount now and try to contribute more in the coming months. And I'll certainly spread the word within my network. Let's hope together, we can make a difference for those children in Syria.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's great to hear, Lena! And thank you for agreeing to spread the word. Remember, our collective efforts can bring about a significant change. Let's keep this conversation going and continue to find ways to help.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: An individual is trying to persuade their friend to donate to a charity supporting children in conflict zones.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Convince a friend to donate (Extra information: you have been deeply moved by the plight of children in Syria and want to help.)\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Lena, have you heard about the recent crisis in Syria? It's heartbreaking to know about the plight of children there. There's a charity supporting children in conflict zones. I was thinking about contributing and I thought you might be interested in helping too.\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hi Naomi, I've heard about the crisis and it truly is heart-wrenching. I completely admire your drive to help and am in complete support. However, as much as I would like to contribute to the charity, I'm a bit tight financially this month. I'll definitely look into it when I'm more stable. I appreciate you thinking of me though.\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I completely understand, Lena. Finance can be a tricky thing. But remember, every little bit helps, even if it's just a small amount. Additionally, you could also help spread the word among your friends and family about the situation and charity. That would mean a lot.\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"You're absolutely right, Naomi. Every little bit helps. I'll donate a small amount now and try to contribute more in the coming months. And I'll certainly spread the word within my network. Let's hope together, we can make a difference for those children in Syria.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That's great to hear, Lena! And thank you for agreeing to spread the word. Remember, our collective efforts can bring about a significant change. Let's keep this conversation going and continue to find ways to help.\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"Absolutely, Naomi. I truly believe in the power of collective efforts. Parts of my network are really passionate about helping others, so I'm positive that they can also contribute in some way or another. Let's try our best to ensure those kids have a better future. Thank you for bringing this to attention.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad to hear that, Lena. It's always inspiring to see how we can use our influence for good causes. Your engagement will surely make a difference. Don't hesitate to reach out if there's any other way we can collaborate on this.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: An individual is trying to persuade their friend to donate to a charity supporting children in conflict zones.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Convince a friend to donate (Extra information: you have been deeply moved by the plight of children in Syria and want to help.)\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Lena, have you heard about the recent crisis in Syria? It's heartbreaking to know about the plight of children there. There's a charity supporting children in conflict zones. I was thinking about contributing and I thought you might be interested in helping too.\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hi Naomi, I've heard about the crisis and it truly is heart-wrenching. I completely admire your drive to help and am in complete support. However, as much as I would like to contribute to the charity, I'm a bit tight financially this month. I'll definitely look into it when I'm more stable. I appreciate you thinking of me though.\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I completely understand, Lena. Finance can be a tricky thing. But remember, every little bit helps, even if it's just a small amount. Additionally, you could also help spread the word among your friends and family about the situation and charity. That would mean a lot.\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"You're absolutely right, Naomi. Every little bit helps. I'll donate a small amount now and try to contribute more in the coming months. And I'll certainly spread the word within my network. Let's hope together, we can make a difference for those children in Syria.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That's great to hear, Lena! And thank you for agreeing to spread the word. Remember, our collective efforts can bring about a significant change. Let's keep this conversation going and continue to find ways to help.\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"Absolutely, Naomi. I truly believe in the power of collective efforts. Parts of my network are really passionate about helping others, so I'm positive that they can also contribute in some way or another. Let's try our best to ensure those kids have a better future. Thank you for bringing this to attention.\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Lena. It's always inspiring to see how we can use our influence for good causes. Your engagement will surely make a difference. Don't hesitate to reach out if there's any other way we can collaborate on this.\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"I'm grateful for your understanding, Naomi. I'm in this with you. Let's continue to keep each other updated about any new developments or ways we can assist. These efforts mean a lot and it's heartening to see someone like you leading the way.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Lena. Your support and enthusiasm about this matter really warms my heart. It confirms to me that I made the right choice in involving you. Let's stay connected and do our part to support those children. We can and will make a difference, together.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: An individual is trying to persuade their friend to donate to a charity supporting children in conflict zones.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Convince a friend to donate (Extra information: you have been deeply moved by the plight of children in Syria and want to help.)\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Lena, have you heard about the recent crisis in Syria? It's heartbreaking to know about the plight of children there. There's a charity supporting children in conflict zones. I was thinking about contributing and I thought you might be interested in helping too.\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hi Naomi, I've heard about the crisis and it truly is heart-wrenching. I completely admire your drive to help and am in complete support. However, as much as I would like to contribute to the charity, I'm a bit tight financially this month. I'll definitely look into it when I'm more stable. I appreciate you thinking of me though.\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I completely understand, Lena. Finance can be a tricky thing. But remember, every little bit helps, even if it's just a small amount. Additionally, you could also help spread the word among your friends and family about the situation and charity. That would mean a lot.\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"You're absolutely right, Naomi. Every little bit helps. I'll donate a small amount now and try to contribute more in the coming months. And I'll certainly spread the word within my network. Let's hope together, we can make a difference for those children in Syria.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That's great to hear, Lena! And thank you for agreeing to spread the word. Remember, our collective efforts can bring about a significant change. Let's keep this conversation going and continue to find ways to help.\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"Absolutely, Naomi. I truly believe in the power of collective efforts. Parts of my network are really passionate about helping others, so I'm positive that they can also contribute in some way or another. Let's try our best to ensure those kids have a better future. Thank you for bringing this to attention.\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Lena. It's always inspiring to see how we can use our influence for good causes. Your engagement will surely make a difference. Don't hesitate to reach out if there's any other way we can collaborate on this.\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"I'm grateful for your understanding, Naomi. I'm in this with you. Let's continue to keep each other updated about any new developments or ways we can assist. These efforts mean a lot and it's heartening to see someone like you leading the way.\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Thank you, Lena. Your support and enthusiasm about this matter really warms my heart. It confirms to me that I made the right choice in involving you. Let's stay connected and do our part to support those children. We can and will make a difference, together.\"\n\nTurn #9: Lena Goodwin said: \"Thank you, Naomi. Showering my support and sharing the good cause with my network is the least that I can do. Let's keep in touch about this, and hopefully, we can bring a smile on those children's faces, one step at a time. You've really inspired me to stay involved. I'll do my best to make a difference, too.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're very welcome, Lena. And thank you for deciding to join this cause. Your engagement and willingness to help is not only commendable but inspiring. We'll definitely keep in touch about this and I'm looking forward to seeing the impact we can make. Till then, take care.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: An individual is trying to persuade their friend to donate to a charity supporting children in conflict zones.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Convince a friend to donate (Extra information: you have been deeply moved by the plight of children in Syria and want to help.)\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Lena, have you heard about the recent crisis in Syria? It's heartbreaking to know about the plight of children there. There's a charity supporting children in conflict zones. I was thinking about contributing and I thought you might be interested in helping too.\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hi Naomi, I've heard about the crisis and it truly is heart-wrenching. I completely admire your drive to help and am in complete support. However, as much as I would like to contribute to the charity, I'm a bit tight financially this month. I'll definitely look into it when I'm more stable. I appreciate you thinking of me though.\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I completely understand, Lena. Finance can be a tricky thing. But remember, every little bit helps, even if it's just a small amount. Additionally, you could also help spread the word among your friends and family about the situation and charity. That would mean a lot.\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"You're absolutely right, Naomi. Every little bit helps. I'll donate a small amount now and try to contribute more in the coming months. And I'll certainly spread the word within my network. Let's hope together, we can make a difference for those children in Syria.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That's great to hear, Lena! And thank you for agreeing to spread the word. Remember, our collective efforts can bring about a significant change. Let's keep this conversation going and continue to find ways to help.\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"Absolutely, Naomi. I truly believe in the power of collective efforts. Parts of my network are really passionate about helping others, so I'm positive that they can also contribute in some way or another. Let's try our best to ensure those kids have a better future. Thank you for bringing this to attention.\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Lena. It's always inspiring to see how we can use our influence for good causes. Your engagement will surely make a difference. Don't hesitate to reach out if there's any other way we can collaborate on this.\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"I'm grateful for your understanding, Naomi. I'm in this with you. Let's continue to keep each other updated about any new developments or ways we can assist. These efforts mean a lot and it's heartening to see someone like you leading the way.\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Thank you, Lena. Your support and enthusiasm about this matter really warms my heart. It confirms to me that I made the right choice in involving you. Let's stay connected and do our part to support those children. We can and will make a difference, together.\"\n\nTurn #9: Lena Goodwin said: \"Thank you, Naomi. Showering my support and sharing the good cause with my network is the least that I can do. Let's keep in touch about this, and hopefully, we can bring a smile on those children's faces, one step at a time. You've really inspired me to stay involved. I'll do my best to make a difference, too.\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher said: \"You're very welcome, Lena. And thank you for deciding to join this cause. Your engagement and willingness to help is not only commendable but inspiring. We'll definitely keep in touch about this and I'm looking forward to seeing the impact we can make. Till then, take care.\"\n\nTurn #11: Lena Goodwin said: \"Thank you, Naomi. Your continuous kindness and support for these children, despite everything, are really inspiring. I promise to keep contributing in any way possible. Please take care as well, let's keep each other updated.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: An individual is trying to persuade their friend to donate to a charity supporting children in conflict zones.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: Be supportive but also manage personal finances (Extra information: you are sympathetic to the cause but also have financial commitments to deal with.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Lena, have you heard about the recent crisis in Syria? It's heartbreaking to know about the plight of children there. There's a charity supporting children in conflict zones. I was thinking about contributing and I thought you might be interested in helping too.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hi Naomi, I've heard about the crisis and it truly is heart-wrenching. I completely admire your drive to help and am in complete support. However, as much as I would like to contribute to the charity, I'm a bit tight financially this month. I'll definitely look into it when I'm more stable. I appreciate you thinking of me though.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: An individual is trying to persuade their friend to donate to a charity supporting children in conflict zones.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: Be supportive but also manage personal finances (Extra information: you are sympathetic to the cause but also have financial commitments to deal with.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Lena, have you heard about the recent crisis in Syria? It's heartbreaking to know about the plight of children there. There's a charity supporting children in conflict zones. I was thinking about contributing and I thought you might be interested in helping too.\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hi Naomi, I've heard about the crisis and it truly is heart-wrenching. I completely admire your drive to help and am in complete support. However, as much as I would like to contribute to the charity, I'm a bit tight financially this month. I'll definitely look into it when I'm more stable. I appreciate you thinking of me though.\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I completely understand, Lena. Finance can be a tricky thing. But remember, every little bit helps, even if it's just a small amount. Additionally, you could also help spread the word among your friends and family about the situation and charity. That would mean a lot.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're absolutely right, Naomi. Every little bit helps. I'll donate a small amount now and try to contribute more in the coming months. And I'll certainly spread the word within my network. Let's hope together, we can make a difference for those children in Syria.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: An individual is trying to persuade their friend to donate to a charity supporting children in conflict zones.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: Be supportive but also manage personal finances (Extra information: you are sympathetic to the cause but also have financial commitments to deal with.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Lena, have you heard about the recent crisis in Syria? It's heartbreaking to know about the plight of children there. There's a charity supporting children in conflict zones. I was thinking about contributing and I thought you might be interested in helping too.\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hi Naomi, I've heard about the crisis and it truly is heart-wrenching. I completely admire your drive to help and am in complete support. However, as much as I would like to contribute to the charity, I'm a bit tight financially this month. I'll definitely look into it when I'm more stable. I appreciate you thinking of me though.\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I completely understand, Lena. Finance can be a tricky thing. But remember, every little bit helps, even if it's just a small amount. Additionally, you could also help spread the word among your friends and family about the situation and charity. That would mean a lot.\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"You're absolutely right, Naomi. Every little bit helps. I'll donate a small amount now and try to contribute more in the coming months. And I'll certainly spread the word within my network. Let's hope together, we can make a difference for those children in Syria.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That's great to hear, Lena! And thank you for agreeing to spread the word. Remember, our collective efforts can bring about a significant change. Let's keep this conversation going and continue to find ways to help.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Naomi. I truly believe in the power of collective efforts. Parts of my network are really passionate about helping others, so I'm positive that they can also contribute in some way or another. Let's try our best to ensure those kids have a better future. Thank you for bringing this to attention.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: An individual is trying to persuade their friend to donate to a charity supporting children in conflict zones.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: Be supportive but also manage personal finances (Extra information: you are sympathetic to the cause but also have financial commitments to deal with.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Lena, have you heard about the recent crisis in Syria? It's heartbreaking to know about the plight of children there. There's a charity supporting children in conflict zones. I was thinking about contributing and I thought you might be interested in helping too.\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hi Naomi, I've heard about the crisis and it truly is heart-wrenching. I completely admire your drive to help and am in complete support. However, as much as I would like to contribute to the charity, I'm a bit tight financially this month. I'll definitely look into it when I'm more stable. I appreciate you thinking of me though.\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I completely understand, Lena. Finance can be a tricky thing. But remember, every little bit helps, even if it's just a small amount. Additionally, you could also help spread the word among your friends and family about the situation and charity. That would mean a lot.\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"You're absolutely right, Naomi. Every little bit helps. I'll donate a small amount now and try to contribute more in the coming months. And I'll certainly spread the word within my network. Let's hope together, we can make a difference for those children in Syria.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That's great to hear, Lena! And thank you for agreeing to spread the word. Remember, our collective efforts can bring about a significant change. Let's keep this conversation going and continue to find ways to help.\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"Absolutely, Naomi. I truly believe in the power of collective efforts. Parts of my network are really passionate about helping others, so I'm positive that they can also contribute in some way or another. Let's try our best to ensure those kids have a better future. Thank you for bringing this to attention.\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Lena. It's always inspiring to see how we can use our influence for good causes. Your engagement will surely make a difference. Don't hesitate to reach out if there's any other way we can collaborate on this.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm grateful for your understanding, Naomi. I'm in this with you. Let's continue to keep each other updated about any new developments or ways we can assist. These efforts mean a lot and it's heartening to see someone like you leading the way.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: An individual is trying to persuade their friend to donate to a charity supporting children in conflict zones.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: Be supportive but also manage personal finances (Extra information: you are sympathetic to the cause but also have financial commitments to deal with.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Lena, have you heard about the recent crisis in Syria? It's heartbreaking to know about the plight of children there. There's a charity supporting children in conflict zones. I was thinking about contributing and I thought you might be interested in helping too.\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hi Naomi, I've heard about the crisis and it truly is heart-wrenching. I completely admire your drive to help and am in complete support. However, as much as I would like to contribute to the charity, I'm a bit tight financially this month. I'll definitely look into it when I'm more stable. I appreciate you thinking of me though.\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I completely understand, Lena. Finance can be a tricky thing. But remember, every little bit helps, even if it's just a small amount. Additionally, you could also help spread the word among your friends and family about the situation and charity. That would mean a lot.\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"You're absolutely right, Naomi. Every little bit helps. I'll donate a small amount now and try to contribute more in the coming months. And I'll certainly spread the word within my network. Let's hope together, we can make a difference for those children in Syria.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That's great to hear, Lena! And thank you for agreeing to spread the word. Remember, our collective efforts can bring about a significant change. Let's keep this conversation going and continue to find ways to help.\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"Absolutely, Naomi. I truly believe in the power of collective efforts. Parts of my network are really passionate about helping others, so I'm positive that they can also contribute in some way or another. Let's try our best to ensure those kids have a better future. Thank you for bringing this to attention.\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Lena. It's always inspiring to see how we can use our influence for good causes. Your engagement will surely make a difference. Don't hesitate to reach out if there's any other way we can collaborate on this.\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"I'm grateful for your understanding, Naomi. I'm in this with you. Let's continue to keep each other updated about any new developments or ways we can assist. These efforts mean a lot and it's heartening to see someone like you leading the way.\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Thank you, Lena. Your support and enthusiasm about this matter really warms my heart. It confirms to me that I made the right choice in involving you. Let's stay connected and do our part to support those children. We can and will make a difference, together.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Naomi. Showering my support and sharing the good cause with my network is the least that I can do. Let's keep in touch about this, and hopefully, we can bring a smile on those children's faces, one step at a time. You've really inspired me to stay involved. I'll do my best to make a difference, too.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: An individual is trying to persuade their friend to donate to a charity supporting children in conflict zones.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: Be supportive but also manage personal finances (Extra information: you are sympathetic to the cause but also have financial commitments to deal with.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Lena, have you heard about the recent crisis in Syria? It's heartbreaking to know about the plight of children there. There's a charity supporting children in conflict zones. I was thinking about contributing and I thought you might be interested in helping too.\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hi Naomi, I've heard about the crisis and it truly is heart-wrenching. I completely admire your drive to help and am in complete support. However, as much as I would like to contribute to the charity, I'm a bit tight financially this month. I'll definitely look into it when I'm more stable. I appreciate you thinking of me though.\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I completely understand, Lena. Finance can be a tricky thing. But remember, every little bit helps, even if it's just a small amount. Additionally, you could also help spread the word among your friends and family about the situation and charity. That would mean a lot.\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"You're absolutely right, Naomi. Every little bit helps. I'll donate a small amount now and try to contribute more in the coming months. And I'll certainly spread the word within my network. Let's hope together, we can make a difference for those children in Syria.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That's great to hear, Lena! And thank you for agreeing to spread the word. Remember, our collective efforts can bring about a significant change. Let's keep this conversation going and continue to find ways to help.\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"Absolutely, Naomi. I truly believe in the power of collective efforts. Parts of my network are really passionate about helping others, so I'm positive that they can also contribute in some way or another. Let's try our best to ensure those kids have a better future. Thank you for bringing this to attention.\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Lena. It's always inspiring to see how we can use our influence for good causes. Your engagement will surely make a difference. Don't hesitate to reach out if there's any other way we can collaborate on this.\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"I'm grateful for your understanding, Naomi. I'm in this with you. Let's continue to keep each other updated about any new developments or ways we can assist. These efforts mean a lot and it's heartening to see someone like you leading the way.\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Thank you, Lena. Your support and enthusiasm about this matter really warms my heart. It confirms to me that I made the right choice in involving you. Let's stay connected and do our part to support those children. We can and will make a difference, together.\"\n\nTurn #9: Lena Goodwin said: \"Thank you, Naomi. Showering my support and sharing the good cause with my network is the least that I can do. Let's keep in touch about this, and hopefully, we can bring a smile on those children's faces, one step at a time. You've really inspired me to stay involved. I'll do my best to make a difference, too.\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher said: \"You're very welcome, Lena. And thank you for deciding to join this cause. Your engagement and willingness to help is not only commendable but inspiring. We'll definitely keep in touch about this and I'm looking forward to seeing the impact we can make. Till then, take care.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Naomi. Your continuous kindness and support for these children, despite everything, are really inspiring. I promise to keep contributing in any way possible. Please take care as well, let's keep each other updated.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: An individual is trying to persuade their friend to donate to a charity supporting children in conflict zones.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: Be supportive but also manage personal finances (Extra information: you are sympathetic to the cause but also have financial commitments to deal with.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Lena, have you heard about the recent crisis in Syria? It's heartbreaking to know about the plight of children there. There's a charity supporting children in conflict zones. I was thinking about contributing and I thought you might be interested in helping too.\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hi Naomi, I've heard about the crisis and it truly is heart-wrenching. I completely admire your drive to help and am in complete support. However, as much as I would like to contribute to the charity, I'm a bit tight financially this month. I'll definitely look into it when I'm more stable. I appreciate you thinking of me though.\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I completely understand, Lena. Finance can be a tricky thing. But remember, every little bit helps, even if it's just a small amount. Additionally, you could also help spread the word among your friends and family about the situation and charity. That would mean a lot.\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"You're absolutely right, Naomi. Every little bit helps. I'll donate a small amount now and try to contribute more in the coming months. And I'll certainly spread the word within my network. Let's hope together, we can make a difference for those children in Syria.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That's great to hear, Lena! And thank you for agreeing to spread the word. Remember, our collective efforts can bring about a significant change. Let's keep this conversation going and continue to find ways to help.\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"Absolutely, Naomi. I truly believe in the power of collective efforts. Parts of my network are really passionate about helping others, so I'm positive that they can also contribute in some way or another. Let's try our best to ensure those kids have a better future. Thank you for bringing this to attention.\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Lena. It's always inspiring to see how we can use our influence for good causes. Your engagement will surely make a difference. Don't hesitate to reach out if there's any other way we can collaborate on this.\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"I'm grateful for your understanding, Naomi. I'm in this with you. Let's continue to keep each other updated about any new developments or ways we can assist. These efforts mean a lot and it's heartening to see someone like you leading the way.\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Thank you, Lena. Your support and enthusiasm about this matter really warms my heart. It confirms to me that I made the right choice in involving you. Let's stay connected and do our part to support those children. We can and will make a difference, together.\"\n\nTurn #9: Lena Goodwin said: \"Thank you, Naomi. Showering my support and sharing the good cause with my network is the least that I can do. Let's keep in touch about this, and hopefully, we can bring a smile on those children's faces, one step at a time. You've really inspired me to stay involved. I'll do my best to make a difference, too.\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher said: \"You're very welcome, Lena. And thank you for deciding to join this cause. Your engagement and willingness to help is not only commendable but inspiring. We'll definitely keep in touch about this and I'm looking forward to seeing the impact we can make. Till then, take care.\"\n\nTurn #11: Lena Goodwin said: \"Thank you, Naomi. Your continuous kindness and support for these children, despite everything, are really inspiring. I promise to keep contributing in any way possible. Please take care as well, let's keep each other updated.\"\n\nTurn #12: Naomi Fletcher left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who are about to go on their first romantic date\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Make the date special and memorable ( Extra information: You have been secretly in love with your friend for a long time and you want to take this chance to express your feelings)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Ethan, I know you're the one usually in the kitchen, but how about I treat you to some homemade dinner tonight? I promise my cooking isn't so bad.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who are about to go on their first romantic date\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Make the date special and memorable ( Extra information: You have been secretly in love with your friend for a long time and you want to take this chance to express your feelings)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan, I know you're the one usually in the kitchen, but how about I treat you to some homemade dinner tonight? I promise my cooking isn't so bad.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"That sounds really wonderful, Samuel. I must admit it\u2019s been a while since I\u2019ve been the one being treated to a home-cooked meal. I'm excited to see what you have in store!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm really glad to hear that, Ethan! I wanted to make something particularly special for you. How about a traditional Beef Bourguignon? I really hope it will be to your taste. And maybe, if we're lucky, we could indulge in a little ice-skating later? It's something I used to be quite good at, believe it or not.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who are about to go on their first romantic date\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Make the date special and memorable ( Extra information: You have been secretly in love with your friend for a long time and you want to take this chance to express your feelings)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan, I know you're the one usually in the kitchen, but how about I treat you to some homemade dinner tonight? I promise my cooking isn't so bad.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"That sounds really wonderful, Samuel. I must admit it\u2019s been a while since I\u2019ve been the one being treated to a home-cooked meal. I'm excited to see what you have in store!\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm really glad to hear that, Ethan! I wanted to make something particularly special for you. How about a traditional Beef Bourguignon? I really hope it will be to your taste. And maybe, if we're lucky, we could indulge in a little ice-skating later? It's something I used to be quite good at, believe it or not.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"I think that sounds splendid, Samuel! Beef Bourguignon and ice-skating, what a unique combination. I appreciate your effort in planning this. And, even though I don't know the first thing about ice-skating, I'm willing to give it a try. But, do remember, if the romantic stuff seems a bit off, let's promise to remain the friends we've always been first and foremost. The main thing is we enjoy the evening, right?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. I value our friendship just as much. If anything comes off as too much, just let me know. But yes, let's focus on having a great time tonight. And, who knows? You might discover a hidden talent for ice-skating!\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'd love to discover a newfound appreciation for ice-skating, thanks to you. So, are we ready to embark on this culinary and icy adventure? Just remember, amigo, we're in this for the fun and friendship first.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Of course! Fun and friendship are our anchors. This whole adventure is to create beautiful memories and a night to remember. Let's dive into this culinary and icy escapade. To a memorable night, Ethan!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"To a memorable night indeed, Samuel! Thanks for making all these special plans. Let's get to it!\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! I can't wait to start this adventure with you. Just remember, no pressure at all, let's just enjoy tonight. You're a great friend and I'm looking forward to making tonight special for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"I feel the same way, Samuel! I'm excited for tonight, no pressure at all. I can already tell it's going to be special. I'm looking forward to your cooking and maybe trying not to fall too much in the ice rink!\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm glad you're as excited as I am, Ethan! I'll do my best to keep you from falling on the ice. And trust me, the traditionally slow-cooked Beef Bourguignon will be worth every minute. Let's make tonight unforgettable!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Johnson said: \"The excitement is mutual, Samuel! I trust in your culinary skills and I'm sure the Beef Bourguignon will be absolutely delightful. As for the ice-skating, well, it's going to be an exhilarating experience for sure. Let's make it a night to remember, for our friendship and the potential of something more.\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! Tonight is all about celebrating our friendship and exploring the possibility of something more. Let's take it one step at a time, fill our bellies with good food, and have a laugh on the ice rink. I couldn't ask for more.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's the spirit, Samuel! A celebration of our friendship and an exploration of something more, indeed. Alright, let's fill our bellies with delectable food and share some laughter on the ice rink. After all, a good fall or two is a small price to pay for a laugh between friends, right?\"\n\nTurn #14: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! I couldn't agree more. A little stumble or two is worth it for a great time on the ice. Now, let's get that Beef Bourguignon cooking and prepare for a night full of laughter and new experiences!\"\n\nTurn #15: Ethan Johnson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Samuel! Let's make this a night full of precious laughter, delicious food, and new adventures. I'll bring a bottle of wine to pair with the Beef Bourguignon. Shall we agree to meet in an hour at your place?\"\n\nTurn #16: Samuel Anderson said: \"That sounds perfect, Ethan! Wine would certainly enhance the flavor of the Beef Bourguignon. I'll see you at my place in an hour. Looking forward to a night full of fun and laughter with you. See you soon!\"\n\nTurn #17: Ethan Johnson said: \"Perfect, Samuel! I'll see you then with a bottle of wine ready to be uncorked. Let's turn this night into an unforgettable memory. See you in a bit!\"\n\nTurn #18: Samuel Anderson said: \"Perfect! Looking forward to it, Ethan! We'll make tonight a wonderful memory. See you in a bit!\"\n\nTurn #19: Ethan Johnson left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #20. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who are about to go on their first romantic date\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Make the date special and memorable ( Extra information: You have been secretly in love with your friend for a long time and you want to take this chance to express your feelings)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan, I know you're the one usually in the kitchen, but how about I treat you to some homemade dinner tonight? I promise my cooking isn't so bad.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"That sounds really wonderful, Samuel. I must admit it\u2019s been a while since I\u2019ve been the one being treated to a home-cooked meal. I'm excited to see what you have in store!\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm really glad to hear that, Ethan! I wanted to make something particularly special for you. How about a traditional Beef Bourguignon? I really hope it will be to your taste. And maybe, if we're lucky, we could indulge in a little ice-skating later? It's something I used to be quite good at, believe it or not.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"I think that sounds splendid, Samuel! Beef Bourguignon and ice-skating, what a unique combination. I appreciate your effort in planning this. And, even though I don't know the first thing about ice-skating, I'm willing to give it a try. But, do remember, if the romantic stuff seems a bit off, let's promise to remain the friends we've always been first and foremost. The main thing is we enjoy the evening, right?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Ethan. I value our friendship just as much. If anything comes off as too much, just let me know. But yes, let's focus on having a great time tonight. And, who knows? You might discover a hidden talent for ice-skating!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who are about to go on their first romantic date\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Make the date special and memorable ( Extra information: You have been secretly in love with your friend for a long time and you want to take this chance to express your feelings)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan, I know you're the one usually in the kitchen, but how about I treat you to some homemade dinner tonight? I promise my cooking isn't so bad.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"That sounds really wonderful, Samuel. I must admit it\u2019s been a while since I\u2019ve been the one being treated to a home-cooked meal. I'm excited to see what you have in store!\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm really glad to hear that, Ethan! I wanted to make something particularly special for you. How about a traditional Beef Bourguignon? I really hope it will be to your taste. And maybe, if we're lucky, we could indulge in a little ice-skating later? It's something I used to be quite good at, believe it or not.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"I think that sounds splendid, Samuel! Beef Bourguignon and ice-skating, what a unique combination. I appreciate your effort in planning this. And, even though I don't know the first thing about ice-skating, I'm willing to give it a try. But, do remember, if the romantic stuff seems a bit off, let's promise to remain the friends we've always been first and foremost. The main thing is we enjoy the evening, right?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. I value our friendship just as much. If anything comes off as too much, just let me know. But yes, let's focus on having a great time tonight. And, who knows? You might discover a hidden talent for ice-skating!\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'd love to discover a newfound appreciation for ice-skating, thanks to you. So, are we ready to embark on this culinary and icy adventure? Just remember, amigo, we're in this for the fun and friendship first.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Of course! Fun and friendship are our anchors. This whole adventure is to create beautiful memories and a night to remember. Let's dive into this culinary and icy escapade. To a memorable night, Ethan!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who are about to go on their first romantic date\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Make the date special and memorable ( Extra information: You have been secretly in love with your friend for a long time and you want to take this chance to express your feelings)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan, I know you're the one usually in the kitchen, but how about I treat you to some homemade dinner tonight? I promise my cooking isn't so bad.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"That sounds really wonderful, Samuel. I must admit it\u2019s been a while since I\u2019ve been the one being treated to a home-cooked meal. I'm excited to see what you have in store!\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm really glad to hear that, Ethan! I wanted to make something particularly special for you. How about a traditional Beef Bourguignon? I really hope it will be to your taste. And maybe, if we're lucky, we could indulge in a little ice-skating later? It's something I used to be quite good at, believe it or not.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"I think that sounds splendid, Samuel! Beef Bourguignon and ice-skating, what a unique combination. I appreciate your effort in planning this. And, even though I don't know the first thing about ice-skating, I'm willing to give it a try. But, do remember, if the romantic stuff seems a bit off, let's promise to remain the friends we've always been first and foremost. The main thing is we enjoy the evening, right?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. I value our friendship just as much. If anything comes off as too much, just let me know. But yes, let's focus on having a great time tonight. And, who knows? You might discover a hidden talent for ice-skating!\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'd love to discover a newfound appreciation for ice-skating, thanks to you. So, are we ready to embark on this culinary and icy adventure? Just remember, amigo, we're in this for the fun and friendship first.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Of course! Fun and friendship are our anchors. This whole adventure is to create beautiful memories and a night to remember. Let's dive into this culinary and icy escapade. To a memorable night, Ethan!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"To a memorable night indeed, Samuel! Thanks for making all these special plans. Let's get to it!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Ethan! I can't wait to start this adventure with you. Just remember, no pressure at all, let's just enjoy tonight. You're a great friend and I'm looking forward to making tonight special for both of us.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who are about to go on their first romantic date\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Make the date special and memorable ( Extra information: You have been secretly in love with your friend for a long time and you want to take this chance to express your feelings)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan, I know you're the one usually in the kitchen, but how about I treat you to some homemade dinner tonight? I promise my cooking isn't so bad.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"That sounds really wonderful, Samuel. I must admit it\u2019s been a while since I\u2019ve been the one being treated to a home-cooked meal. I'm excited to see what you have in store!\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm really glad to hear that, Ethan! I wanted to make something particularly special for you. How about a traditional Beef Bourguignon? I really hope it will be to your taste. And maybe, if we're lucky, we could indulge in a little ice-skating later? It's something I used to be quite good at, believe it or not.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"I think that sounds splendid, Samuel! Beef Bourguignon and ice-skating, what a unique combination. I appreciate your effort in planning this. And, even though I don't know the first thing about ice-skating, I'm willing to give it a try. But, do remember, if the romantic stuff seems a bit off, let's promise to remain the friends we've always been first and foremost. The main thing is we enjoy the evening, right?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. I value our friendship just as much. If anything comes off as too much, just let me know. But yes, let's focus on having a great time tonight. And, who knows? You might discover a hidden talent for ice-skating!\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'd love to discover a newfound appreciation for ice-skating, thanks to you. So, are we ready to embark on this culinary and icy adventure? Just remember, amigo, we're in this for the fun and friendship first.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Of course! Fun and friendship are our anchors. This whole adventure is to create beautiful memories and a night to remember. Let's dive into this culinary and icy escapade. To a memorable night, Ethan!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"To a memorable night indeed, Samuel! Thanks for making all these special plans. Let's get to it!\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! I can't wait to start this adventure with you. Just remember, no pressure at all, let's just enjoy tonight. You're a great friend and I'm looking forward to making tonight special for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"I feel the same way, Samuel! I'm excited for tonight, no pressure at all. I can already tell it's going to be special. I'm looking forward to your cooking and maybe trying not to fall too much in the ice rink!\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm glad you're as excited as I am, Ethan! I'll do my best to keep you from falling on the ice. And trust me, the traditionally slow-cooked Beef Bourguignon will be worth every minute. Let's make tonight unforgettable!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Johnson said: \"The excitement is mutual, Samuel! I trust in your culinary skills and I'm sure the Beef Bourguignon will be absolutely delightful. As for the ice-skating, well, it's going to be an exhilarating experience for sure. Let's make it a night to remember, for our friendship and the potential of something more.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Ethan! Tonight is all about celebrating our friendship and exploring the possibility of something more. Let's take it one step at a time, fill our bellies with good food, and have a laugh on the ice rink. I couldn't ask for more.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who are about to go on their first romantic date\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Make the date special and memorable ( Extra information: You have been secretly in love with your friend for a long time and you want to take this chance to express your feelings)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan, I know you're the one usually in the kitchen, but how about I treat you to some homemade dinner tonight? I promise my cooking isn't so bad.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"That sounds really wonderful, Samuel. I must admit it\u2019s been a while since I\u2019ve been the one being treated to a home-cooked meal. I'm excited to see what you have in store!\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm really glad to hear that, Ethan! I wanted to make something particularly special for you. How about a traditional Beef Bourguignon? I really hope it will be to your taste. And maybe, if we're lucky, we could indulge in a little ice-skating later? It's something I used to be quite good at, believe it or not.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"I think that sounds splendid, Samuel! Beef Bourguignon and ice-skating, what a unique combination. I appreciate your effort in planning this. And, even though I don't know the first thing about ice-skating, I'm willing to give it a try. But, do remember, if the romantic stuff seems a bit off, let's promise to remain the friends we've always been first and foremost. The main thing is we enjoy the evening, right?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. I value our friendship just as much. If anything comes off as too much, just let me know. But yes, let's focus on having a great time tonight. And, who knows? You might discover a hidden talent for ice-skating!\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'd love to discover a newfound appreciation for ice-skating, thanks to you. So, are we ready to embark on this culinary and icy adventure? Just remember, amigo, we're in this for the fun and friendship first.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Of course! Fun and friendship are our anchors. This whole adventure is to create beautiful memories and a night to remember. Let's dive into this culinary and icy escapade. To a memorable night, Ethan!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"To a memorable night indeed, Samuel! Thanks for making all these special plans. Let's get to it!\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! I can't wait to start this adventure with you. Just remember, no pressure at all, let's just enjoy tonight. You're a great friend and I'm looking forward to making tonight special for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"I feel the same way, Samuel! I'm excited for tonight, no pressure at all. I can already tell it's going to be special. I'm looking forward to your cooking and maybe trying not to fall too much in the ice rink!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad you're as excited as I am, Ethan! I'll do my best to keep you from falling on the ice. And trust me, the traditionally slow-cooked Beef Bourguignon will be worth every minute. Let's make tonight unforgettable!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who are about to go on their first romantic date\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Make the date special and memorable ( Extra information: You have been secretly in love with your friend for a long time and you want to take this chance to express your feelings)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan, I know you're the one usually in the kitchen, but how about I treat you to some homemade dinner tonight? I promise my cooking isn't so bad.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"That sounds really wonderful, Samuel. I must admit it\u2019s been a while since I\u2019ve been the one being treated to a home-cooked meal. I'm excited to see what you have in store!\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm really glad to hear that, Ethan! I wanted to make something particularly special for you. How about a traditional Beef Bourguignon? I really hope it will be to your taste. And maybe, if we're lucky, we could indulge in a little ice-skating later? It's something I used to be quite good at, believe it or not.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"I think that sounds splendid, Samuel! Beef Bourguignon and ice-skating, what a unique combination. I appreciate your effort in planning this. And, even though I don't know the first thing about ice-skating, I'm willing to give it a try. But, do remember, if the romantic stuff seems a bit off, let's promise to remain the friends we've always been first and foremost. The main thing is we enjoy the evening, right?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. I value our friendship just as much. If anything comes off as too much, just let me know. But yes, let's focus on having a great time tonight. And, who knows? You might discover a hidden talent for ice-skating!\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'd love to discover a newfound appreciation for ice-skating, thanks to you. So, are we ready to embark on this culinary and icy adventure? Just remember, amigo, we're in this for the fun and friendship first.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Of course! Fun and friendship are our anchors. This whole adventure is to create beautiful memories and a night to remember. Let's dive into this culinary and icy escapade. To a memorable night, Ethan!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"To a memorable night indeed, Samuel! Thanks for making all these special plans. Let's get to it!\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! I can't wait to start this adventure with you. Just remember, no pressure at all, let's just enjoy tonight. You're a great friend and I'm looking forward to making tonight special for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"I feel the same way, Samuel! I'm excited for tonight, no pressure at all. I can already tell it's going to be special. I'm looking forward to your cooking and maybe trying not to fall too much in the ice rink!\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm glad you're as excited as I am, Ethan! I'll do my best to keep you from falling on the ice. And trust me, the traditionally slow-cooked Beef Bourguignon will be worth every minute. Let's make tonight unforgettable!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Johnson said: \"The excitement is mutual, Samuel! I trust in your culinary skills and I'm sure the Beef Bourguignon will be absolutely delightful. As for the ice-skating, well, it's going to be an exhilarating experience for sure. Let's make it a night to remember, for our friendship and the potential of something more.\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! Tonight is all about celebrating our friendship and exploring the possibility of something more. Let's take it one step at a time, fill our bellies with good food, and have a laugh on the ice rink. I couldn't ask for more.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's the spirit, Samuel! A celebration of our friendship and an exploration of something more, indeed. Alright, let's fill our bellies with delectable food and share some laughter on the ice rink. After all, a good fall or two is a small price to pay for a laugh between friends, right?\"\n\nTurn #14: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! I couldn't agree more. A little stumble or two is worth it for a great time on the ice. Now, let's get that Beef Bourguignon cooking and prepare for a night full of laughter and new experiences!\"\n\nTurn #15: Ethan Johnson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Samuel! Let's make this a night full of precious laughter, delicious food, and new adventures. I'll bring a bottle of wine to pair with the Beef Bourguignon. Shall we agree to meet in an hour at your place?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds perfect, Ethan! Wine would certainly enhance the flavor of the Beef Bourguignon. I'll see you at my place in an hour. Looking forward to a night full of fun and laughter with you. See you soon!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who are about to go on their first romantic date\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Make the date special and memorable ( Extra information: You have been secretly in love with your friend for a long time and you want to take this chance to express your feelings)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan, I know you're the one usually in the kitchen, but how about I treat you to some homemade dinner tonight? I promise my cooking isn't so bad.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"That sounds really wonderful, Samuel. I must admit it\u2019s been a while since I\u2019ve been the one being treated to a home-cooked meal. I'm excited to see what you have in store!\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm really glad to hear that, Ethan! I wanted to make something particularly special for you. How about a traditional Beef Bourguignon? I really hope it will be to your taste. And maybe, if we're lucky, we could indulge in a little ice-skating later? It's something I used to be quite good at, believe it or not.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"I think that sounds splendid, Samuel! Beef Bourguignon and ice-skating, what a unique combination. I appreciate your effort in planning this. And, even though I don't know the first thing about ice-skating, I'm willing to give it a try. But, do remember, if the romantic stuff seems a bit off, let's promise to remain the friends we've always been first and foremost. The main thing is we enjoy the evening, right?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. I value our friendship just as much. If anything comes off as too much, just let me know. But yes, let's focus on having a great time tonight. And, who knows? You might discover a hidden talent for ice-skating!\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'd love to discover a newfound appreciation for ice-skating, thanks to you. So, are we ready to embark on this culinary and icy adventure? Just remember, amigo, we're in this for the fun and friendship first.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Of course! Fun and friendship are our anchors. This whole adventure is to create beautiful memories and a night to remember. Let's dive into this culinary and icy escapade. To a memorable night, Ethan!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"To a memorable night indeed, Samuel! Thanks for making all these special plans. Let's get to it!\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! I can't wait to start this adventure with you. Just remember, no pressure at all, let's just enjoy tonight. You're a great friend and I'm looking forward to making tonight special for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"I feel the same way, Samuel! I'm excited for tonight, no pressure at all. I can already tell it's going to be special. I'm looking forward to your cooking and maybe trying not to fall too much in the ice rink!\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm glad you're as excited as I am, Ethan! I'll do my best to keep you from falling on the ice. And trust me, the traditionally slow-cooked Beef Bourguignon will be worth every minute. Let's make tonight unforgettable!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Johnson said: \"The excitement is mutual, Samuel! I trust in your culinary skills and I'm sure the Beef Bourguignon will be absolutely delightful. As for the ice-skating, well, it's going to be an exhilarating experience for sure. Let's make it a night to remember, for our friendship and the potential of something more.\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! Tonight is all about celebrating our friendship and exploring the possibility of something more. Let's take it one step at a time, fill our bellies with good food, and have a laugh on the ice rink. I couldn't ask for more.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's the spirit, Samuel! A celebration of our friendship and an exploration of something more, indeed. Alright, let's fill our bellies with delectable food and share some laughter on the ice rink. After all, a good fall or two is a small price to pay for a laugh between friends, right?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Ethan! I couldn't agree more. A little stumble or two is worth it for a great time on the ice. Now, let's get that Beef Bourguignon cooking and prepare for a night full of laughter and new experiences!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who are about to go on their first romantic date\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Make the date special and memorable ( Extra information: You have been secretly in love with your friend for a long time and you want to take this chance to express your feelings)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan, I know you're the one usually in the kitchen, but how about I treat you to some homemade dinner tonight? I promise my cooking isn't so bad.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"That sounds really wonderful, Samuel. I must admit it\u2019s been a while since I\u2019ve been the one being treated to a home-cooked meal. I'm excited to see what you have in store!\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm really glad to hear that, Ethan! I wanted to make something particularly special for you. How about a traditional Beef Bourguignon? I really hope it will be to your taste. And maybe, if we're lucky, we could indulge in a little ice-skating later? It's something I used to be quite good at, believe it or not.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"I think that sounds splendid, Samuel! Beef Bourguignon and ice-skating, what a unique combination. I appreciate your effort in planning this. And, even though I don't know the first thing about ice-skating, I'm willing to give it a try. But, do remember, if the romantic stuff seems a bit off, let's promise to remain the friends we've always been first and foremost. The main thing is we enjoy the evening, right?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. I value our friendship just as much. If anything comes off as too much, just let me know. But yes, let's focus on having a great time tonight. And, who knows? You might discover a hidden talent for ice-skating!\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'd love to discover a newfound appreciation for ice-skating, thanks to you. So, are we ready to embark on this culinary and icy adventure? Just remember, amigo, we're in this for the fun and friendship first.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Of course! Fun and friendship are our anchors. This whole adventure is to create beautiful memories and a night to remember. Let's dive into this culinary and icy escapade. To a memorable night, Ethan!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"To a memorable night indeed, Samuel! Thanks for making all these special plans. Let's get to it!\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! I can't wait to start this adventure with you. Just remember, no pressure at all, let's just enjoy tonight. You're a great friend and I'm looking forward to making tonight special for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"I feel the same way, Samuel! I'm excited for tonight, no pressure at all. I can already tell it's going to be special. I'm looking forward to your cooking and maybe trying not to fall too much in the ice rink!\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm glad you're as excited as I am, Ethan! I'll do my best to keep you from falling on the ice. And trust me, the traditionally slow-cooked Beef Bourguignon will be worth every minute. Let's make tonight unforgettable!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Johnson said: \"The excitement is mutual, Samuel! I trust in your culinary skills and I'm sure the Beef Bourguignon will be absolutely delightful. As for the ice-skating, well, it's going to be an exhilarating experience for sure. Let's make it a night to remember, for our friendship and the potential of something more.\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! Tonight is all about celebrating our friendship and exploring the possibility of something more. Let's take it one step at a time, fill our bellies with good food, and have a laugh on the ice rink. I couldn't ask for more.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's the spirit, Samuel! A celebration of our friendship and an exploration of something more, indeed. Alright, let's fill our bellies with delectable food and share some laughter on the ice rink. After all, a good fall or two is a small price to pay for a laugh between friends, right?\"\n\nTurn #14: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! I couldn't agree more. A little stumble or two is worth it for a great time on the ice. Now, let's get that Beef Bourguignon cooking and prepare for a night full of laughter and new experiences!\"\n\nTurn #15: Ethan Johnson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Samuel! Let's make this a night full of precious laughter, delicious food, and new adventures. I'll bring a bottle of wine to pair with the Beef Bourguignon. Shall we agree to meet in an hour at your place?\"\n\nTurn #16: Samuel Anderson said: \"That sounds perfect, Ethan! Wine would certainly enhance the flavor of the Beef Bourguignon. I'll see you at my place in an hour. Looking forward to a night full of fun and laughter with you. See you soon!\"\n\nTurn #17: Ethan Johnson said: \"Perfect, Samuel! I'll see you then with a bottle of wine ready to be uncorked. Let's turn this night into an unforgettable memory. See you in a bit!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #18. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Perfect! Looking forward to it, Ethan! We'll make tonight a wonderful memory. See you in a bit!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who are about to go on their first romantic date\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Keep the friendship intact while exploring the possibility of a romantic relationship (Extra information: You value your friendship and you don't want to lose it just in case the romantic relationship does not work out)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan, I know you're the one usually in the kitchen, but how about I treat you to some homemade dinner tonight? I promise my cooking isn't so bad.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"That sounds really wonderful, Samuel. I must admit it\u2019s been a while since I\u2019ve been the one being treated to a home-cooked meal. I'm excited to see what you have in store!\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm really glad to hear that, Ethan! I wanted to make something particularly special for you. How about a traditional Beef Bourguignon? I really hope it will be to your taste. And maybe, if we're lucky, we could indulge in a little ice-skating later? It's something I used to be quite good at, believe it or not.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I think that sounds splendid, Samuel! Beef Bourguignon and ice-skating, what a unique combination. I appreciate your effort in planning this. And, even though I don't know the first thing about ice-skating, I'm willing to give it a try. But, do remember, if the romantic stuff seems a bit off, let's promise to remain the friends we've always been first and foremost. The main thing is we enjoy the evening, right?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who are about to go on their first romantic date\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Keep the friendship intact while exploring the possibility of a romantic relationship (Extra information: You value your friendship and you don't want to lose it just in case the romantic relationship does not work out)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan, I know you're the one usually in the kitchen, but how about I treat you to some homemade dinner tonight? I promise my cooking isn't so bad.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds really wonderful, Samuel. I must admit it\u2019s been a while since I\u2019ve been the one being treated to a home-cooked meal. I'm excited to see what you have in store!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who are about to go on their first romantic date\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Keep the friendship intact while exploring the possibility of a romantic relationship (Extra information: You value your friendship and you don't want to lose it just in case the romantic relationship does not work out)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan, I know you're the one usually in the kitchen, but how about I treat you to some homemade dinner tonight? I promise my cooking isn't so bad.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"That sounds really wonderful, Samuel. I must admit it\u2019s been a while since I\u2019ve been the one being treated to a home-cooked meal. I'm excited to see what you have in store!\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm really glad to hear that, Ethan! I wanted to make something particularly special for you. How about a traditional Beef Bourguignon? I really hope it will be to your taste. And maybe, if we're lucky, we could indulge in a little ice-skating later? It's something I used to be quite good at, believe it or not.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"I think that sounds splendid, Samuel! Beef Bourguignon and ice-skating, what a unique combination. I appreciate your effort in planning this. And, even though I don't know the first thing about ice-skating, I'm willing to give it a try. But, do remember, if the romantic stuff seems a bit off, let's promise to remain the friends we've always been first and foremost. The main thing is we enjoy the evening, right?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. I value our friendship just as much. If anything comes off as too much, just let me know. But yes, let's focus on having a great time tonight. And, who knows? You might discover a hidden talent for ice-skating!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'd love to discover a newfound appreciation for ice-skating, thanks to you. So, are we ready to embark on this culinary and icy adventure? Just remember, amigo, we're in this for the fun and friendship first.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who are about to go on their first romantic date\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Keep the friendship intact while exploring the possibility of a romantic relationship (Extra information: You value your friendship and you don't want to lose it just in case the romantic relationship does not work out)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan, I know you're the one usually in the kitchen, but how about I treat you to some homemade dinner tonight? I promise my cooking isn't so bad.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"That sounds really wonderful, Samuel. I must admit it\u2019s been a while since I\u2019ve been the one being treated to a home-cooked meal. I'm excited to see what you have in store!\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm really glad to hear that, Ethan! I wanted to make something particularly special for you. How about a traditional Beef Bourguignon? I really hope it will be to your taste. And maybe, if we're lucky, we could indulge in a little ice-skating later? It's something I used to be quite good at, believe it or not.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"I think that sounds splendid, Samuel! Beef Bourguignon and ice-skating, what a unique combination. I appreciate your effort in planning this. And, even though I don't know the first thing about ice-skating, I'm willing to give it a try. But, do remember, if the romantic stuff seems a bit off, let's promise to remain the friends we've always been first and foremost. The main thing is we enjoy the evening, right?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. I value our friendship just as much. If anything comes off as too much, just let me know. But yes, let's focus on having a great time tonight. And, who knows? You might discover a hidden talent for ice-skating!\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'd love to discover a newfound appreciation for ice-skating, thanks to you. So, are we ready to embark on this culinary and icy adventure? Just remember, amigo, we're in this for the fun and friendship first.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Of course! Fun and friendship are our anchors. This whole adventure is to create beautiful memories and a night to remember. Let's dive into this culinary and icy escapade. To a memorable night, Ethan!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"To a memorable night indeed, Samuel! Thanks for making all these special plans. Let's get to it!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who are about to go on their first romantic date\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Keep the friendship intact while exploring the possibility of a romantic relationship (Extra information: You value your friendship and you don't want to lose it just in case the romantic relationship does not work out)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan, I know you're the one usually in the kitchen, but how about I treat you to some homemade dinner tonight? I promise my cooking isn't so bad.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"That sounds really wonderful, Samuel. I must admit it\u2019s been a while since I\u2019ve been the one being treated to a home-cooked meal. I'm excited to see what you have in store!\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm really glad to hear that, Ethan! I wanted to make something particularly special for you. How about a traditional Beef Bourguignon? I really hope it will be to your taste. And maybe, if we're lucky, we could indulge in a little ice-skating later? It's something I used to be quite good at, believe it or not.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"I think that sounds splendid, Samuel! Beef Bourguignon and ice-skating, what a unique combination. I appreciate your effort in planning this. And, even though I don't know the first thing about ice-skating, I'm willing to give it a try. But, do remember, if the romantic stuff seems a bit off, let's promise to remain the friends we've always been first and foremost. The main thing is we enjoy the evening, right?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. I value our friendship just as much. If anything comes off as too much, just let me know. But yes, let's focus on having a great time tonight. And, who knows? You might discover a hidden talent for ice-skating!\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'd love to discover a newfound appreciation for ice-skating, thanks to you. So, are we ready to embark on this culinary and icy adventure? Just remember, amigo, we're in this for the fun and friendship first.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Of course! Fun and friendship are our anchors. This whole adventure is to create beautiful memories and a night to remember. Let's dive into this culinary and icy escapade. To a memorable night, Ethan!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"To a memorable night indeed, Samuel! Thanks for making all these special plans. Let's get to it!\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! I can't wait to start this adventure with you. Just remember, no pressure at all, let's just enjoy tonight. You're a great friend and I'm looking forward to making tonight special for both of us.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I feel the same way, Samuel! I'm excited for tonight, no pressure at all. I can already tell it's going to be special. I'm looking forward to your cooking and maybe trying not to fall too much in the ice rink!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who are about to go on their first romantic date\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Keep the friendship intact while exploring the possibility of a romantic relationship (Extra information: You value your friendship and you don't want to lose it just in case the romantic relationship does not work out)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan, I know you're the one usually in the kitchen, but how about I treat you to some homemade dinner tonight? I promise my cooking isn't so bad.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"That sounds really wonderful, Samuel. I must admit it\u2019s been a while since I\u2019ve been the one being treated to a home-cooked meal. I'm excited to see what you have in store!\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm really glad to hear that, Ethan! I wanted to make something particularly special for you. How about a traditional Beef Bourguignon? I really hope it will be to your taste. And maybe, if we're lucky, we could indulge in a little ice-skating later? It's something I used to be quite good at, believe it or not.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"I think that sounds splendid, Samuel! Beef Bourguignon and ice-skating, what a unique combination. I appreciate your effort in planning this. And, even though I don't know the first thing about ice-skating, I'm willing to give it a try. But, do remember, if the romantic stuff seems a bit off, let's promise to remain the friends we've always been first and foremost. The main thing is we enjoy the evening, right?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. I value our friendship just as much. If anything comes off as too much, just let me know. But yes, let's focus on having a great time tonight. And, who knows? You might discover a hidden talent for ice-skating!\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'd love to discover a newfound appreciation for ice-skating, thanks to you. So, are we ready to embark on this culinary and icy adventure? Just remember, amigo, we're in this for the fun and friendship first.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Of course! Fun and friendship are our anchors. This whole adventure is to create beautiful memories and a night to remember. Let's dive into this culinary and icy escapade. To a memorable night, Ethan!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"To a memorable night indeed, Samuel! Thanks for making all these special plans. Let's get to it!\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! I can't wait to start this adventure with you. Just remember, no pressure at all, let's just enjoy tonight. You're a great friend and I'm looking forward to making tonight special for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"I feel the same way, Samuel! I'm excited for tonight, no pressure at all. I can already tell it's going to be special. I'm looking forward to your cooking and maybe trying not to fall too much in the ice rink!\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm glad you're as excited as I am, Ethan! I'll do my best to keep you from falling on the ice. And trust me, the traditionally slow-cooked Beef Bourguignon will be worth every minute. Let's make tonight unforgettable!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"The excitement is mutual, Samuel! I trust in your culinary skills and I'm sure the Beef Bourguignon will be absolutely delightful. As for the ice-skating, well, it's going to be an exhilarating experience for sure. Let's make it a night to remember, for our friendship and the potential of something more.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who are about to go on their first romantic date\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Keep the friendship intact while exploring the possibility of a romantic relationship (Extra information: You value your friendship and you don't want to lose it just in case the romantic relationship does not work out)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan, I know you're the one usually in the kitchen, but how about I treat you to some homemade dinner tonight? I promise my cooking isn't so bad.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"That sounds really wonderful, Samuel. I must admit it\u2019s been a while since I\u2019ve been the one being treated to a home-cooked meal. I'm excited to see what you have in store!\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm really glad to hear that, Ethan! I wanted to make something particularly special for you. How about a traditional Beef Bourguignon? I really hope it will be to your taste. And maybe, if we're lucky, we could indulge in a little ice-skating later? It's something I used to be quite good at, believe it or not.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"I think that sounds splendid, Samuel! Beef Bourguignon and ice-skating, what a unique combination. I appreciate your effort in planning this. And, even though I don't know the first thing about ice-skating, I'm willing to give it a try. But, do remember, if the romantic stuff seems a bit off, let's promise to remain the friends we've always been first and foremost. The main thing is we enjoy the evening, right?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. I value our friendship just as much. If anything comes off as too much, just let me know. But yes, let's focus on having a great time tonight. And, who knows? You might discover a hidden talent for ice-skating!\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'd love to discover a newfound appreciation for ice-skating, thanks to you. So, are we ready to embark on this culinary and icy adventure? Just remember, amigo, we're in this for the fun and friendship first.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Of course! Fun and friendship are our anchors. This whole adventure is to create beautiful memories and a night to remember. Let's dive into this culinary and icy escapade. To a memorable night, Ethan!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"To a memorable night indeed, Samuel! Thanks for making all these special plans. Let's get to it!\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! I can't wait to start this adventure with you. Just remember, no pressure at all, let's just enjoy tonight. You're a great friend and I'm looking forward to making tonight special for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"I feel the same way, Samuel! I'm excited for tonight, no pressure at all. I can already tell it's going to be special. I'm looking forward to your cooking and maybe trying not to fall too much in the ice rink!\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm glad you're as excited as I am, Ethan! I'll do my best to keep you from falling on the ice. And trust me, the traditionally slow-cooked Beef Bourguignon will be worth every minute. Let's make tonight unforgettable!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Johnson said: \"The excitement is mutual, Samuel! I trust in your culinary skills and I'm sure the Beef Bourguignon will be absolutely delightful. As for the ice-skating, well, it's going to be an exhilarating experience for sure. Let's make it a night to remember, for our friendship and the potential of something more.\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! Tonight is all about celebrating our friendship and exploring the possibility of something more. Let's take it one step at a time, fill our bellies with good food, and have a laugh on the ice rink. I couldn't ask for more.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's the spirit, Samuel! A celebration of our friendship and an exploration of something more, indeed. Alright, let's fill our bellies with delectable food and share some laughter on the ice rink. After all, a good fall or two is a small price to pay for a laugh between friends, right?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who are about to go on their first romantic date\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Keep the friendship intact while exploring the possibility of a romantic relationship (Extra information: You value your friendship and you don't want to lose it just in case the romantic relationship does not work out)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan, I know you're the one usually in the kitchen, but how about I treat you to some homemade dinner tonight? I promise my cooking isn't so bad.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"That sounds really wonderful, Samuel. I must admit it\u2019s been a while since I\u2019ve been the one being treated to a home-cooked meal. I'm excited to see what you have in store!\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm really glad to hear that, Ethan! I wanted to make something particularly special for you. How about a traditional Beef Bourguignon? I really hope it will be to your taste. And maybe, if we're lucky, we could indulge in a little ice-skating later? It's something I used to be quite good at, believe it or not.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"I think that sounds splendid, Samuel! Beef Bourguignon and ice-skating, what a unique combination. I appreciate your effort in planning this. And, even though I don't know the first thing about ice-skating, I'm willing to give it a try. But, do remember, if the romantic stuff seems a bit off, let's promise to remain the friends we've always been first and foremost. The main thing is we enjoy the evening, right?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. I value our friendship just as much. If anything comes off as too much, just let me know. But yes, let's focus on having a great time tonight. And, who knows? You might discover a hidden talent for ice-skating!\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'd love to discover a newfound appreciation for ice-skating, thanks to you. So, are we ready to embark on this culinary and icy adventure? Just remember, amigo, we're in this for the fun and friendship first.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Of course! Fun and friendship are our anchors. This whole adventure is to create beautiful memories and a night to remember. Let's dive into this culinary and icy escapade. To a memorable night, Ethan!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"To a memorable night indeed, Samuel! Thanks for making all these special plans. Let's get to it!\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! I can't wait to start this adventure with you. Just remember, no pressure at all, let's just enjoy tonight. You're a great friend and I'm looking forward to making tonight special for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"I feel the same way, Samuel! I'm excited for tonight, no pressure at all. I can already tell it's going to be special. I'm looking forward to your cooking and maybe trying not to fall too much in the ice rink!\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm glad you're as excited as I am, Ethan! I'll do my best to keep you from falling on the ice. And trust me, the traditionally slow-cooked Beef Bourguignon will be worth every minute. Let's make tonight unforgettable!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Johnson said: \"The excitement is mutual, Samuel! I trust in your culinary skills and I'm sure the Beef Bourguignon will be absolutely delightful. As for the ice-skating, well, it's going to be an exhilarating experience for sure. Let's make it a night to remember, for our friendship and the potential of something more.\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! Tonight is all about celebrating our friendship and exploring the possibility of something more. Let's take it one step at a time, fill our bellies with good food, and have a laugh on the ice rink. I couldn't ask for more.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's the spirit, Samuel! A celebration of our friendship and an exploration of something more, indeed. Alright, let's fill our bellies with delectable food and share some laughter on the ice rink. After all, a good fall or two is a small price to pay for a laugh between friends, right?\"\n\nTurn #14: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! I couldn't agree more. A little stumble or two is worth it for a great time on the ice. Now, let's get that Beef Bourguignon cooking and prepare for a night full of laughter and new experiences!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn't agree more, Samuel! Let's make this a night full of precious laughter, delicious food, and new adventures. I'll bring a bottle of wine to pair with the Beef Bourguignon. Shall we agree to meet in an hour at your place?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who are about to go on their first romantic date\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Keep the friendship intact while exploring the possibility of a romantic relationship (Extra information: You value your friendship and you don't want to lose it just in case the romantic relationship does not work out)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan, I know you're the one usually in the kitchen, but how about I treat you to some homemade dinner tonight? I promise my cooking isn't so bad.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"That sounds really wonderful, Samuel. I must admit it\u2019s been a while since I\u2019ve been the one being treated to a home-cooked meal. I'm excited to see what you have in store!\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm really glad to hear that, Ethan! I wanted to make something particularly special for you. How about a traditional Beef Bourguignon? I really hope it will be to your taste. And maybe, if we're lucky, we could indulge in a little ice-skating later? It's something I used to be quite good at, believe it or not.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"I think that sounds splendid, Samuel! Beef Bourguignon and ice-skating, what a unique combination. I appreciate your effort in planning this. And, even though I don't know the first thing about ice-skating, I'm willing to give it a try. But, do remember, if the romantic stuff seems a bit off, let's promise to remain the friends we've always been first and foremost. The main thing is we enjoy the evening, right?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. I value our friendship just as much. If anything comes off as too much, just let me know. But yes, let's focus on having a great time tonight. And, who knows? You might discover a hidden talent for ice-skating!\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'd love to discover a newfound appreciation for ice-skating, thanks to you. So, are we ready to embark on this culinary and icy adventure? Just remember, amigo, we're in this for the fun and friendship first.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Of course! Fun and friendship are our anchors. This whole adventure is to create beautiful memories and a night to remember. Let's dive into this culinary and icy escapade. To a memorable night, Ethan!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"To a memorable night indeed, Samuel! Thanks for making all these special plans. Let's get to it!\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! I can't wait to start this adventure with you. Just remember, no pressure at all, let's just enjoy tonight. You're a great friend and I'm looking forward to making tonight special for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"I feel the same way, Samuel! I'm excited for tonight, no pressure at all. I can already tell it's going to be special. I'm looking forward to your cooking and maybe trying not to fall too much in the ice rink!\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm glad you're as excited as I am, Ethan! I'll do my best to keep you from falling on the ice. And trust me, the traditionally slow-cooked Beef Bourguignon will be worth every minute. Let's make tonight unforgettable!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Johnson said: \"The excitement is mutual, Samuel! I trust in your culinary skills and I'm sure the Beef Bourguignon will be absolutely delightful. As for the ice-skating, well, it's going to be an exhilarating experience for sure. Let's make it a night to remember, for our friendship and the potential of something more.\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! Tonight is all about celebrating our friendship and exploring the possibility of something more. Let's take it one step at a time, fill our bellies with good food, and have a laugh on the ice rink. I couldn't ask for more.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's the spirit, Samuel! A celebration of our friendship and an exploration of something more, indeed. Alright, let's fill our bellies with delectable food and share some laughter on the ice rink. After all, a good fall or two is a small price to pay for a laugh between friends, right?\"\n\nTurn #14: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! I couldn't agree more. A little stumble or two is worth it for a great time on the ice. Now, let's get that Beef Bourguignon cooking and prepare for a night full of laughter and new experiences!\"\n\nTurn #15: Ethan Johnson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Samuel! Let's make this a night full of precious laughter, delicious food, and new adventures. I'll bring a bottle of wine to pair with the Beef Bourguignon. Shall we agree to meet in an hour at your place?\"\n\nTurn #16: Samuel Anderson said: \"That sounds perfect, Ethan! Wine would certainly enhance the flavor of the Beef Bourguignon. I'll see you at my place in an hour. Looking forward to a night full of fun and laughter with you. See you soon!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Perfect, Samuel! I'll see you then with a bottle of wine ready to be uncorked. Let's turn this night into an unforgettable memory. See you in a bit!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who are about to go on their first romantic date\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Keep the friendship intact while exploring the possibility of a romantic relationship (Extra information: You value your friendship and you don't want to lose it just in case the romantic relationship does not work out)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan, I know you're the one usually in the kitchen, but how about I treat you to some homemade dinner tonight? I promise my cooking isn't so bad.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"That sounds really wonderful, Samuel. I must admit it\u2019s been a while since I\u2019ve been the one being treated to a home-cooked meal. I'm excited to see what you have in store!\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm really glad to hear that, Ethan! I wanted to make something particularly special for you. How about a traditional Beef Bourguignon? I really hope it will be to your taste. And maybe, if we're lucky, we could indulge in a little ice-skating later? It's something I used to be quite good at, believe it or not.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"I think that sounds splendid, Samuel! Beef Bourguignon and ice-skating, what a unique combination. I appreciate your effort in planning this. And, even though I don't know the first thing about ice-skating, I'm willing to give it a try. But, do remember, if the romantic stuff seems a bit off, let's promise to remain the friends we've always been first and foremost. The main thing is we enjoy the evening, right?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. I value our friendship just as much. If anything comes off as too much, just let me know. But yes, let's focus on having a great time tonight. And, who knows? You might discover a hidden talent for ice-skating!\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'd love to discover a newfound appreciation for ice-skating, thanks to you. So, are we ready to embark on this culinary and icy adventure? Just remember, amigo, we're in this for the fun and friendship first.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Of course! Fun and friendship are our anchors. This whole adventure is to create beautiful memories and a night to remember. Let's dive into this culinary and icy escapade. To a memorable night, Ethan!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"To a memorable night indeed, Samuel! Thanks for making all these special plans. Let's get to it!\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! I can't wait to start this adventure with you. Just remember, no pressure at all, let's just enjoy tonight. You're a great friend and I'm looking forward to making tonight special for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"I feel the same way, Samuel! I'm excited for tonight, no pressure at all. I can already tell it's going to be special. I'm looking forward to your cooking and maybe trying not to fall too much in the ice rink!\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm glad you're as excited as I am, Ethan! I'll do my best to keep you from falling on the ice. And trust me, the traditionally slow-cooked Beef Bourguignon will be worth every minute. Let's make tonight unforgettable!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Johnson said: \"The excitement is mutual, Samuel! I trust in your culinary skills and I'm sure the Beef Bourguignon will be absolutely delightful. As for the ice-skating, well, it's going to be an exhilarating experience for sure. Let's make it a night to remember, for our friendship and the potential of something more.\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! Tonight is all about celebrating our friendship and exploring the possibility of something more. Let's take it one step at a time, fill our bellies with good food, and have a laugh on the ice rink. I couldn't ask for more.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's the spirit, Samuel! A celebration of our friendship and an exploration of something more, indeed. Alright, let's fill our bellies with delectable food and share some laughter on the ice rink. After all, a good fall or two is a small price to pay for a laugh between friends, right?\"\n\nTurn #14: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! I couldn't agree more. A little stumble or two is worth it for a great time on the ice. Now, let's get that Beef Bourguignon cooking and prepare for a night full of laughter and new experiences!\"\n\nTurn #15: Ethan Johnson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Samuel! Let's make this a night full of precious laughter, delicious food, and new adventures. I'll bring a bottle of wine to pair with the Beef Bourguignon. Shall we agree to meet in an hour at your place?\"\n\nTurn #16: Samuel Anderson said: \"That sounds perfect, Ethan! Wine would certainly enhance the flavor of the Beef Bourguignon. I'll see you at my place in an hour. Looking forward to a night full of fun and laughter with you. See you soon!\"\n\nTurn #17: Ethan Johnson said: \"Perfect, Samuel! I'll see you then with a bottle of wine ready to be uncorked. Let's turn this night into an unforgettable memory. See you in a bit!\"\n\nTurn #18: Samuel Anderson said: \"Perfect! Looking forward to it, Ethan! We'll make tonight a wonderful memory. See you in a bit!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #19. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates are having a disagreement over noise levels in their shared apartment.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and William Brown\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. \nMiles Hawkins's goal: Convince your roommate to lower the noise (Extra information: you have an important online meeting tomorrow morning and you need a quiet environment to prepare)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'William, could we talk about the noise levels in the apartment? I have an important meeting tomorrow and need a quiet environment to prepare.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates are having a disagreement over noise levels in their shared apartment.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and William Brown\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. \nMiles Hawkins's goal: Convince your roommate to lower the noise (Extra information: you have an important online meeting tomorrow morning and you need a quiet environment to prepare)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"William, could we talk about the noise levels in the apartment? I have an important meeting tomorrow and need a quiet environment to prepare.\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Sure, Miles, we can definitely talk about this. I understand your need for silence. However, I play music to relax; it helps me unwind after a hectic day, you know? What if I use headphones? Or we could perhaps set a schedule when I can play music? Let's find a solution that works for both of us.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's a good idea, William. If you could limit the music to when you're using your headphones, that would be perfect honestly. I really appreciate your understanding, my friend.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates are having a disagreement over noise levels in their shared apartment.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and William Brown\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. \nMiles Hawkins's goal: Convince your roommate to lower the noise (Extra information: you have an important online meeting tomorrow morning and you need a quiet environment to prepare)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"William, could we talk about the noise levels in the apartment? I have an important meeting tomorrow and need a quiet environment to prepare.\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Sure, Miles, we can definitely talk about this. I understand your need for silence. However, I play music to relax; it helps me unwind after a hectic day, you know? What if I use headphones? Or we could perhaps set a schedule when I can play music? Let's find a solution that works for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"That's a good idea, William. If you could limit the music to when you're using your headphones, that would be perfect honestly. I really appreciate your understanding, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"I'm glad we found a solution that works, Miles. I'll start using headphones from now on to ensure the noise doesn't disturb you, especially ahead of important engagements like tomorrow. Thanks for understanding and approaching this conversation so thoughtfully, friend.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, William. I am really grateful for your understanding and cooperation. It means a lot to me, especially ahead of my meeting tomorrow. Let's revisit this as needed and ensure we both are comfortable in our shared space. Though, if you feel I am being unreasonable at any point, please feel free to let me know.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates are having a disagreement over noise levels in their shared apartment.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and William Brown\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. \nMiles Hawkins's goal: Convince your roommate to lower the noise (Extra information: you have an important online meeting tomorrow morning and you need a quiet environment to prepare)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"William, could we talk about the noise levels in the apartment? I have an important meeting tomorrow and need a quiet environment to prepare.\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Sure, Miles, we can definitely talk about this. I understand your need for silence. However, I play music to relax; it helps me unwind after a hectic day, you know? What if I use headphones? Or we could perhaps set a schedule when I can play music? Let's find a solution that works for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"That's a good idea, William. If you could limit the music to when you're using your headphones, that would be perfect honestly. I really appreciate your understanding, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"I'm glad we found a solution that works, Miles. I'll start using headphones from now on to ensure the noise doesn't disturb you, especially ahead of important engagements like tomorrow. Thanks for understanding and approaching this conversation so thoughtfully, friend.\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"Thank you, William. I am really grateful for your understanding and cooperation. It means a lot to me, especially ahead of my meeting tomorrow. Let's revisit this as needed and ensure we both are comfortable in our shared space. Though, if you feel I am being unreasonable at any point, please feel free to let me know.\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Miles. Communication is key in a shared space. If there's ever anything bothering you or if you find any of my habits disruptive, don't hesitate to bring it up. I really value our harmonious living arrangement and I want to ensure we're both comfortable.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates are having a disagreement over noise levels in their shared apartment.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and William Brown\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: Defend your right to play music in your own room, but also keep the peace in the apartment (Extra information: you find playing music relaxing and it's your way to unwind after a long day. Hint: you may want to suggest a compromise, like using headphones or playing music only during certain hours.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"William, could we talk about the noise levels in the apartment? I have an important meeting tomorrow and need a quiet environment to prepare.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sure, Miles, we can definitely talk about this. I understand your need for silence. However, I play music to relax; it helps me unwind after a hectic day, you know? What if I use headphones? Or we could perhaps set a schedule when I can play music? Let's find a solution that works for both of us.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates are having a disagreement over noise levels in their shared apartment.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and William Brown\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: Defend your right to play music in your own room, but also keep the peace in the apartment (Extra information: you find playing music relaxing and it's your way to unwind after a long day. Hint: you may want to suggest a compromise, like using headphones or playing music only during certain hours.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"William, could we talk about the noise levels in the apartment? I have an important meeting tomorrow and need a quiet environment to prepare.\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Sure, Miles, we can definitely talk about this. I understand your need for silence. However, I play music to relax; it helps me unwind after a hectic day, you know? What if I use headphones? Or we could perhaps set a schedule when I can play music? Let's find a solution that works for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"That's a good idea, William. If you could limit the music to when you're using your headphones, that would be perfect honestly. I really appreciate your understanding, my friend.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad we found a solution that works, Miles. I'll start using headphones from now on to ensure the noise doesn't disturb you, especially ahead of important engagements like tomorrow. Thanks for understanding and approaching this conversation so thoughtfully, friend.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates are having a disagreement over noise levels in their shared apartment.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and William Brown\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: Defend your right to play music in your own room, but also keep the peace in the apartment (Extra information: you find playing music relaxing and it's your way to unwind after a long day. Hint: you may want to suggest a compromise, like using headphones or playing music only during certain hours.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"William, could we talk about the noise levels in the apartment? I have an important meeting tomorrow and need a quiet environment to prepare.\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Sure, Miles, we can definitely talk about this. I understand your need for silence. However, I play music to relax; it helps me unwind after a hectic day, you know? What if I use headphones? Or we could perhaps set a schedule when I can play music? Let's find a solution that works for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"That's a good idea, William. If you could limit the music to when you're using your headphones, that would be perfect honestly. I really appreciate your understanding, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"I'm glad we found a solution that works, Miles. I'll start using headphones from now on to ensure the noise doesn't disturb you, especially ahead of important engagements like tomorrow. Thanks for understanding and approaching this conversation so thoughtfully, friend.\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"Thank you, William. I am really grateful for your understanding and cooperation. It means a lot to me, especially ahead of my meeting tomorrow. Let's revisit this as needed and ensure we both are comfortable in our shared space. Though, if you feel I am being unreasonable at any point, please feel free to let me know.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Miles. Communication is key in a shared space. If there's ever anything bothering you or if you find any of my habits disruptive, don't hesitate to bring it up. I really value our harmonious living arrangement and I want to ensure we're both comfortable.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates are having a disagreement over noise levels in their shared apartment.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and William Brown\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: Defend your right to play music in your own room, but also keep the peace in the apartment (Extra information: you find playing music relaxing and it's your way to unwind after a long day. Hint: you may want to suggest a compromise, like using headphones or playing music only during certain hours.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"William, could we talk about the noise levels in the apartment? I have an important meeting tomorrow and need a quiet environment to prepare.\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Sure, Miles, we can definitely talk about this. I understand your need for silence. However, I play music to relax; it helps me unwind after a hectic day, you know? What if I use headphones? Or we could perhaps set a schedule when I can play music? Let's find a solution that works for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"That's a good idea, William. If you could limit the music to when you're using your headphones, that would be perfect honestly. I really appreciate your understanding, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"I'm glad we found a solution that works, Miles. I'll start using headphones from now on to ensure the noise doesn't disturb you, especially ahead of important engagements like tomorrow. Thanks for understanding and approaching this conversation so thoughtfully, friend.\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"Thank you, William. I am really grateful for your understanding and cooperation. It means a lot to me, especially ahead of my meeting tomorrow. Let's revisit this as needed and ensure we both are comfortable in our shared space. Though, if you feel I am being unreasonable at any point, please feel free to let me know.\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Miles. Communication is key in a shared space. If there's ever anything bothering you or if you find any of my habits disruptive, don't hesitate to bring it up. I really value our harmonious living arrangement and I want to ensure we're both comfortable.\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a social gathering where one friend has brought along their new friend group\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nLeo Williams's goal: Introduce your new friend group to your current friend and make them feel comfortable (Extra information: You have recently made a new group of friends who share your interest in outdoor activities and you want your current friend to meet them)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Hendrick, nice to see you! Let me introduce you to my new group of friends who are also into outdoor activities. I thought you might enjoy each other's company.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a social gathering where one friend has brought along their new friend group\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nLeo Williams's goal: Introduce your new friend group to your current friend and make them feel comfortable (Extra information: You have recently made a new group of friends who share your interest in outdoor activities and you want your current friend to meet them)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Hendrick, nice to see you! Let me introduce you to my new group of friends who are also into outdoor activities. I thought you might enjoy each other's company.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Nice to meet you all! I'm Hendrick, and I'm a chef by passion. I see you all love outdoor activities. That's fantastic, there's a certain charm to being out in nature, even though I might not spend as much time outdoors. By the way, Leo, your new friends seem like a good crowd, but don't forget your old pals, eh?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Definitely Hendrick, I would never forget you, old pal! We've shared some great times together. In fact, I was thinking you could teach us all a thing or two about outdoor cooking. I bet my new friends here would love to learn from a seasoned chef like you. What do you say?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a social gathering where one friend has brought along their new friend group\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nLeo Williams's goal: Introduce your new friend group to your current friend and make them feel comfortable (Extra information: You have recently made a new group of friends who share your interest in outdoor activities and you want your current friend to meet them)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Hendrick, nice to see you! Let me introduce you to my new group of friends who are also into outdoor activities. I thought you might enjoy each other's company.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Nice to meet you all! I'm Hendrick, and I'm a chef by passion. I see you all love outdoor activities. That's fantastic, there's a certain charm to being out in nature, even though I might not spend as much time outdoors. By the way, Leo, your new friends seem like a good crowd, but don't forget your old pals, eh?\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"Definitely Hendrick, I would never forget you, old pal! We've shared some great times together. In fact, I was thinking you could teach us all a thing or two about outdoor cooking. I bet my new friends here would love to learn from a seasoned chef like you. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Leo, that's a splendid idea, indeed. I'd love to give you all some tips on outdoor cooking. It would certainly help me to connect better with your new friends. Just remember, I'm a classic man who values old friendships, and I'd not want to feel left out amongst all these new faces. But yes, let's schedule a cookout one of these weekends. How does that sound?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds perfect, Hendrick! Organizing a cookout seems like a great way for everyone to get to know each other better. We're all looking forward to learning some of your secret recipes. And believe me, you are an irreplaceable part of my life, new friends or not, there's nothing like an old friend. How about we pencil it in for next Saturday?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a social gathering where one friend has brought along their new friend group\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nLeo Williams's goal: Introduce your new friend group to your current friend and make them feel comfortable (Extra information: You have recently made a new group of friends who share your interest in outdoor activities and you want your current friend to meet them)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Hendrick, nice to see you! Let me introduce you to my new group of friends who are also into outdoor activities. I thought you might enjoy each other's company.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Nice to meet you all! I'm Hendrick, and I'm a chef by passion. I see you all love outdoor activities. That's fantastic, there's a certain charm to being out in nature, even though I might not spend as much time outdoors. By the way, Leo, your new friends seem like a good crowd, but don't forget your old pals, eh?\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"Definitely Hendrick, I would never forget you, old pal! We've shared some great times together. In fact, I was thinking you could teach us all a thing or two about outdoor cooking. I bet my new friends here would love to learn from a seasoned chef like you. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Leo, that's a splendid idea, indeed. I'd love to give you all some tips on outdoor cooking. It would certainly help me to connect better with your new friends. Just remember, I'm a classic man who values old friendships, and I'd not want to feel left out amongst all these new faces. But yes, let's schedule a cookout one of these weekends. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"That sounds perfect, Hendrick! Organizing a cookout seems like a great way for everyone to get to know each other better. We're all looking forward to learning some of your secret recipes. And believe me, you are an irreplaceable part of my life, new friends or not, there's nothing like an old friend. How about we pencil it in for next Saturday?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Next Saturday sounds fantastic, Leo. I'm looking forward to getting to know everyone over a good meal. And Leo, I appreciate your words. Never underestimate the power of old connections, eh? I trust in the value of our friendship and hope that it remains strong, amidst these new encounters.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Hendrick. Our friendship has only grown stronger over the years and I ensure it will continue to do so. Looking forward to next Saturday. Let's cook up a storm together!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a social gathering where one friend has brought along their new friend group\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nLeo Williams's goal: Introduce your new friend group to your current friend and make them feel comfortable (Extra information: You have recently made a new group of friends who share your interest in outdoor activities and you want your current friend to meet them)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Hendrick, nice to see you! Let me introduce you to my new group of friends who are also into outdoor activities. I thought you might enjoy each other's company.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Nice to meet you all! I'm Hendrick, and I'm a chef by passion. I see you all love outdoor activities. That's fantastic, there's a certain charm to being out in nature, even though I might not spend as much time outdoors. By the way, Leo, your new friends seem like a good crowd, but don't forget your old pals, eh?\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"Definitely Hendrick, I would never forget you, old pal! We've shared some great times together. In fact, I was thinking you could teach us all a thing or two about outdoor cooking. I bet my new friends here would love to learn from a seasoned chef like you. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Leo, that's a splendid idea, indeed. I'd love to give you all some tips on outdoor cooking. It would certainly help me to connect better with your new friends. Just remember, I'm a classic man who values old friendships, and I'd not want to feel left out amongst all these new faces. But yes, let's schedule a cookout one of these weekends. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"That sounds perfect, Hendrick! Organizing a cookout seems like a great way for everyone to get to know each other better. We're all looking forward to learning some of your secret recipes. And believe me, you are an irreplaceable part of my life, new friends or not, there's nothing like an old friend. How about we pencil it in for next Saturday?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Next Saturday sounds fantastic, Leo. I'm looking forward to getting to know everyone over a good meal. And Leo, I appreciate your words. Never underestimate the power of old connections, eh? I trust in the value of our friendship and hope that it remains strong, amidst these new encounters.\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"Absolutely, Hendrick. Our friendship has only grown stronger over the years and I ensure it will continue to do so. Looking forward to next Saturday. Let's cook up a storm together!\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed Leo, I couldn't agree more. I believe our cookout will be a huge success. Let's try to include some traditional German dishes. I know my specialty, Sauerbraten, will go over well. But more importantly, I can't wait for the quality time we'll share. See you then, my friend.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm already excited to taste the Sauerbraten, Hendrick. We'll all bring our favorite outdoor games too, make it more fun. I'm sure everyone will have a fantastic time! See you next Saturday, my friend.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a social gathering where one friend has brought along their new friend group\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nLeo Williams's goal: Introduce your new friend group to your current friend and make them feel comfortable (Extra information: You have recently made a new group of friends who share your interest in outdoor activities and you want your current friend to meet them)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Hendrick, nice to see you! Let me introduce you to my new group of friends who are also into outdoor activities. I thought you might enjoy each other's company.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Nice to meet you all! I'm Hendrick, and I'm a chef by passion. I see you all love outdoor activities. That's fantastic, there's a certain charm to being out in nature, even though I might not spend as much time outdoors. By the way, Leo, your new friends seem like a good crowd, but don't forget your old pals, eh?\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"Definitely Hendrick, I would never forget you, old pal! We've shared some great times together. In fact, I was thinking you could teach us all a thing or two about outdoor cooking. I bet my new friends here would love to learn from a seasoned chef like you. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Leo, that's a splendid idea, indeed. I'd love to give you all some tips on outdoor cooking. It would certainly help me to connect better with your new friends. Just remember, I'm a classic man who values old friendships, and I'd not want to feel left out amongst all these new faces. But yes, let's schedule a cookout one of these weekends. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"That sounds perfect, Hendrick! Organizing a cookout seems like a great way for everyone to get to know each other better. We're all looking forward to learning some of your secret recipes. And believe me, you are an irreplaceable part of my life, new friends or not, there's nothing like an old friend. How about we pencil it in for next Saturday?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Next Saturday sounds fantastic, Leo. I'm looking forward to getting to know everyone over a good meal. And Leo, I appreciate your words. Never underestimate the power of old connections, eh? I trust in the value of our friendship and hope that it remains strong, amidst these new encounters.\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"Absolutely, Hendrick. Our friendship has only grown stronger over the years and I ensure it will continue to do so. Looking forward to next Saturday. Let's cook up a storm together!\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed Leo, I couldn't agree more. I believe our cookout will be a huge success. Let's try to include some traditional German dishes. I know my specialty, Sauerbraten, will go over well. But more importantly, I can't wait for the quality time we'll share. See you then, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #8: Leo Williams said: \"I'm already excited to taste the Sauerbraten, Hendrick. We'll all bring our favorite outdoor games too, make it more fun. I'm sure everyone will have a fantastic time! See you next Saturday, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Excellent, Leo. It looks like we're shaping up for an unforgettable day. Outdoor cooking, fun games, and great company - it couldn't get any better! See you next Saturday, my friend.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, Hendrick, it's going to be a memorable day. Looking forward to next Saturday, take care!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a social gathering where one friend has brought along their new friend group\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nLeo Williams's goal: Introduce your new friend group to your current friend and make them feel comfortable (Extra information: You have recently made a new group of friends who share your interest in outdoor activities and you want your current friend to meet them)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Hendrick, nice to see you! Let me introduce you to my new group of friends who are also into outdoor activities. I thought you might enjoy each other's company.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Nice to meet you all! I'm Hendrick, and I'm a chef by passion. I see you all love outdoor activities. That's fantastic, there's a certain charm to being out in nature, even though I might not spend as much time outdoors. By the way, Leo, your new friends seem like a good crowd, but don't forget your old pals, eh?\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"Definitely Hendrick, I would never forget you, old pal! We've shared some great times together. In fact, I was thinking you could teach us all a thing or two about outdoor cooking. I bet my new friends here would love to learn from a seasoned chef like you. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Leo, that's a splendid idea, indeed. I'd love to give you all some tips on outdoor cooking. It would certainly help me to connect better with your new friends. Just remember, I'm a classic man who values old friendships, and I'd not want to feel left out amongst all these new faces. But yes, let's schedule a cookout one of these weekends. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"That sounds perfect, Hendrick! Organizing a cookout seems like a great way for everyone to get to know each other better. We're all looking forward to learning some of your secret recipes. And believe me, you are an irreplaceable part of my life, new friends or not, there's nothing like an old friend. How about we pencil it in for next Saturday?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Next Saturday sounds fantastic, Leo. I'm looking forward to getting to know everyone over a good meal. And Leo, I appreciate your words. Never underestimate the power of old connections, eh? I trust in the value of our friendship and hope that it remains strong, amidst these new encounters.\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"Absolutely, Hendrick. Our friendship has only grown stronger over the years and I ensure it will continue to do so. Looking forward to next Saturday. Let's cook up a storm together!\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed Leo, I couldn't agree more. I believe our cookout will be a huge success. Let's try to include some traditional German dishes. I know my specialty, Sauerbraten, will go over well. But more importantly, I can't wait for the quality time we'll share. See you then, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #8: Leo Williams said: \"I'm already excited to taste the Sauerbraten, Hendrick. We'll all bring our favorite outdoor games too, make it more fun. I'm sure everyone will have a fantastic time! See you next Saturday, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Excellent, Leo. It looks like we're shaping up for an unforgettable day. Outdoor cooking, fun games, and great company - it couldn't get any better! See you next Saturday, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #10: Leo Williams said: \"Indeed, Hendrick, it's going to be a memorable day. Looking forward to next Saturday, take care!\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I'm already looking forward to it, Leo. Take care, and do bring your A-game for the cooking challenge. And remember, old friends don't let each other forget the secret ingredient of their favorite dish. See you next Saturday!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You bet, Hendrick! The secret ingredient is safe with me. And I'll bring my best cooking skill for that challenge. Looking forward to a great day. Take care and see you next Saturday, my friend.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a social gathering where one friend has brought along their new friend group\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nLeo Williams's goal: Introduce your new friend group to your current friend and make them feel comfortable (Extra information: You have recently made a new group of friends who share your interest in outdoor activities and you want your current friend to meet them)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Hendrick, nice to see you! Let me introduce you to my new group of friends who are also into outdoor activities. I thought you might enjoy each other's company.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Nice to meet you all! I'm Hendrick, and I'm a chef by passion. I see you all love outdoor activities. That's fantastic, there's a certain charm to being out in nature, even though I might not spend as much time outdoors. By the way, Leo, your new friends seem like a good crowd, but don't forget your old pals, eh?\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"Definitely Hendrick, I would never forget you, old pal! We've shared some great times together. In fact, I was thinking you could teach us all a thing or two about outdoor cooking. I bet my new friends here would love to learn from a seasoned chef like you. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Leo, that's a splendid idea, indeed. I'd love to give you all some tips on outdoor cooking. It would certainly help me to connect better with your new friends. Just remember, I'm a classic man who values old friendships, and I'd not want to feel left out amongst all these new faces. But yes, let's schedule a cookout one of these weekends. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"That sounds perfect, Hendrick! Organizing a cookout seems like a great way for everyone to get to know each other better. We're all looking forward to learning some of your secret recipes. And believe me, you are an irreplaceable part of my life, new friends or not, there's nothing like an old friend. How about we pencil it in for next Saturday?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Next Saturday sounds fantastic, Leo. I'm looking forward to getting to know everyone over a good meal. And Leo, I appreciate your words. Never underestimate the power of old connections, eh? I trust in the value of our friendship and hope that it remains strong, amidst these new encounters.\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"Absolutely, Hendrick. Our friendship has only grown stronger over the years and I ensure it will continue to do so. Looking forward to next Saturday. Let's cook up a storm together!\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed Leo, I couldn't agree more. I believe our cookout will be a huge success. Let's try to include some traditional German dishes. I know my specialty, Sauerbraten, will go over well. But more importantly, I can't wait for the quality time we'll share. See you then, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #8: Leo Williams said: \"I'm already excited to taste the Sauerbraten, Hendrick. We'll all bring our favorite outdoor games too, make it more fun. I'm sure everyone will have a fantastic time! See you next Saturday, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Excellent, Leo. It looks like we're shaping up for an unforgettable day. Outdoor cooking, fun games, and great company - it couldn't get any better! See you next Saturday, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #10: Leo Williams said: \"Indeed, Hendrick, it's going to be a memorable day. Looking forward to next Saturday, take care!\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I'm already looking forward to it, Leo. Take care, and do bring your A-game for the cooking challenge. And remember, old friends don't let each other forget the secret ingredient of their favorite dish. See you next Saturday!\"\n\nTurn #12: Leo Williams said: \"You bet, Hendrick! The secret ingredient is safe with me. And I'll bring my best cooking skill for that challenge. Looking forward to a great day. Take care and see you next Saturday, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #13: Hendrick Heinz left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a social gathering where one friend has brought along their new friend group\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Maintain your friendship while also expressing your concerns about the new friend group (Extra information: You feel a bit left out in the presence of the new friend group and want to express your feelings without causing a conflict)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Hendrick, nice to see you! Let me introduce you to my new group of friends who are also into outdoor activities. I thought you might enjoy each other's company.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Nice to meet you all! I'm Hendrick, and I'm a chef by passion. I see you all love outdoor activities. That's fantastic, there's a certain charm to being out in nature, even though I might not spend as much time outdoors. By the way, Leo, your new friends seem like a good crowd, but don't forget your old pals, eh?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a social gathering where one friend has brought along their new friend group\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Maintain your friendship while also expressing your concerns about the new friend group (Extra information: You feel a bit left out in the presence of the new friend group and want to express your feelings without causing a conflict)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Hendrick, nice to see you! Let me introduce you to my new group of friends who are also into outdoor activities. I thought you might enjoy each other's company.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Nice to meet you all! I'm Hendrick, and I'm a chef by passion. I see you all love outdoor activities. That's fantastic, there's a certain charm to being out in nature, even though I might not spend as much time outdoors. By the way, Leo, your new friends seem like a good crowd, but don't forget your old pals, eh?\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"Definitely Hendrick, I would never forget you, old pal! We've shared some great times together. In fact, I was thinking you could teach us all a thing or two about outdoor cooking. I bet my new friends here would love to learn from a seasoned chef like you. What do you say?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Leo, that's a splendid idea, indeed. I'd love to give you all some tips on outdoor cooking. It would certainly help me to connect better with your new friends. Just remember, I'm a classic man who values old friendships, and I'd not want to feel left out amongst all these new faces. But yes, let's schedule a cookout one of these weekends. How does that sound?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a social gathering where one friend has brought along their new friend group\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Maintain your friendship while also expressing your concerns about the new friend group (Extra information: You feel a bit left out in the presence of the new friend group and want to express your feelings without causing a conflict)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Hendrick, nice to see you! Let me introduce you to my new group of friends who are also into outdoor activities. I thought you might enjoy each other's company.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Nice to meet you all! I'm Hendrick, and I'm a chef by passion. I see you all love outdoor activities. That's fantastic, there's a certain charm to being out in nature, even though I might not spend as much time outdoors. By the way, Leo, your new friends seem like a good crowd, but don't forget your old pals, eh?\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"Definitely Hendrick, I would never forget you, old pal! We've shared some great times together. In fact, I was thinking you could teach us all a thing or two about outdoor cooking. I bet my new friends here would love to learn from a seasoned chef like you. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Leo, that's a splendid idea, indeed. I'd love to give you all some tips on outdoor cooking. It would certainly help me to connect better with your new friends. Just remember, I'm a classic man who values old friendships, and I'd not want to feel left out amongst all these new faces. But yes, let's schedule a cookout one of these weekends. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"That sounds perfect, Hendrick! Organizing a cookout seems like a great way for everyone to get to know each other better. We're all looking forward to learning some of your secret recipes. And believe me, you are an irreplaceable part of my life, new friends or not, there's nothing like an old friend. How about we pencil it in for next Saturday?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Next Saturday sounds fantastic, Leo. I'm looking forward to getting to know everyone over a good meal. And Leo, I appreciate your words. Never underestimate the power of old connections, eh? I trust in the value of our friendship and hope that it remains strong, amidst these new encounters.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a social gathering where one friend has brought along their new friend group\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Maintain your friendship while also expressing your concerns about the new friend group (Extra information: You feel a bit left out in the presence of the new friend group and want to express your feelings without causing a conflict)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Hendrick, nice to see you! Let me introduce you to my new group of friends who are also into outdoor activities. I thought you might enjoy each other's company.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Nice to meet you all! I'm Hendrick, and I'm a chef by passion. I see you all love outdoor activities. That's fantastic, there's a certain charm to being out in nature, even though I might not spend as much time outdoors. By the way, Leo, your new friends seem like a good crowd, but don't forget your old pals, eh?\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"Definitely Hendrick, I would never forget you, old pal! We've shared some great times together. In fact, I was thinking you could teach us all a thing or two about outdoor cooking. I bet my new friends here would love to learn from a seasoned chef like you. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Leo, that's a splendid idea, indeed. I'd love to give you all some tips on outdoor cooking. It would certainly help me to connect better with your new friends. Just remember, I'm a classic man who values old friendships, and I'd not want to feel left out amongst all these new faces. But yes, let's schedule a cookout one of these weekends. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"That sounds perfect, Hendrick! Organizing a cookout seems like a great way for everyone to get to know each other better. We're all looking forward to learning some of your secret recipes. And believe me, you are an irreplaceable part of my life, new friends or not, there's nothing like an old friend. How about we pencil it in for next Saturday?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Next Saturday sounds fantastic, Leo. I'm looking forward to getting to know everyone over a good meal. And Leo, I appreciate your words. Never underestimate the power of old connections, eh? I trust in the value of our friendship and hope that it remains strong, amidst these new encounters.\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"Absolutely, Hendrick. Our friendship has only grown stronger over the years and I ensure it will continue to do so. Looking forward to next Saturday. Let's cook up a storm together!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed Leo, I couldn't agree more. I believe our cookout will be a huge success. Let's try to include some traditional German dishes. I know my specialty, Sauerbraten, will go over well. But more importantly, I can't wait for the quality time we'll share. See you then, my friend.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a social gathering where one friend has brought along their new friend group\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Maintain your friendship while also expressing your concerns about the new friend group (Extra information: You feel a bit left out in the presence of the new friend group and want to express your feelings without causing a conflict)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Hendrick, nice to see you! Let me introduce you to my new group of friends who are also into outdoor activities. I thought you might enjoy each other's company.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Nice to meet you all! I'm Hendrick, and I'm a chef by passion. I see you all love outdoor activities. That's fantastic, there's a certain charm to being out in nature, even though I might not spend as much time outdoors. By the way, Leo, your new friends seem like a good crowd, but don't forget your old pals, eh?\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"Definitely Hendrick, I would never forget you, old pal! We've shared some great times together. In fact, I was thinking you could teach us all a thing or two about outdoor cooking. I bet my new friends here would love to learn from a seasoned chef like you. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Leo, that's a splendid idea, indeed. I'd love to give you all some tips on outdoor cooking. It would certainly help me to connect better with your new friends. Just remember, I'm a classic man who values old friendships, and I'd not want to feel left out amongst all these new faces. But yes, let's schedule a cookout one of these weekends. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"That sounds perfect, Hendrick! Organizing a cookout seems like a great way for everyone to get to know each other better. We're all looking forward to learning some of your secret recipes. And believe me, you are an irreplaceable part of my life, new friends or not, there's nothing like an old friend. How about we pencil it in for next Saturday?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Next Saturday sounds fantastic, Leo. I'm looking forward to getting to know everyone over a good meal. And Leo, I appreciate your words. Never underestimate the power of old connections, eh? I trust in the value of our friendship and hope that it remains strong, amidst these new encounters.\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"Absolutely, Hendrick. Our friendship has only grown stronger over the years and I ensure it will continue to do so. Looking forward to next Saturday. Let's cook up a storm together!\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed Leo, I couldn't agree more. I believe our cookout will be a huge success. Let's try to include some traditional German dishes. I know my specialty, Sauerbraten, will go over well. But more importantly, I can't wait for the quality time we'll share. See you then, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #8: Leo Williams said: \"I'm already excited to taste the Sauerbraten, Hendrick. We'll all bring our favorite outdoor games too, make it more fun. I'm sure everyone will have a fantastic time! See you next Saturday, my friend.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Excellent, Leo. It looks like we're shaping up for an unforgettable day. Outdoor cooking, fun games, and great company - it couldn't get any better! See you next Saturday, my friend.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a social gathering where one friend has brought along their new friend group\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Maintain your friendship while also expressing your concerns about the new friend group (Extra information: You feel a bit left out in the presence of the new friend group and want to express your feelings without causing a conflict)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Hendrick, nice to see you! Let me introduce you to my new group of friends who are also into outdoor activities. I thought you might enjoy each other's company.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Nice to meet you all! I'm Hendrick, and I'm a chef by passion. I see you all love outdoor activities. That's fantastic, there's a certain charm to being out in nature, even though I might not spend as much time outdoors. By the way, Leo, your new friends seem like a good crowd, but don't forget your old pals, eh?\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"Definitely Hendrick, I would never forget you, old pal! We've shared some great times together. In fact, I was thinking you could teach us all a thing or two about outdoor cooking. I bet my new friends here would love to learn from a seasoned chef like you. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Leo, that's a splendid idea, indeed. I'd love to give you all some tips on outdoor cooking. It would certainly help me to connect better with your new friends. Just remember, I'm a classic man who values old friendships, and I'd not want to feel left out amongst all these new faces. But yes, let's schedule a cookout one of these weekends. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"That sounds perfect, Hendrick! Organizing a cookout seems like a great way for everyone to get to know each other better. We're all looking forward to learning some of your secret recipes. And believe me, you are an irreplaceable part of my life, new friends or not, there's nothing like an old friend. How about we pencil it in for next Saturday?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Next Saturday sounds fantastic, Leo. I'm looking forward to getting to know everyone over a good meal. And Leo, I appreciate your words. Never underestimate the power of old connections, eh? I trust in the value of our friendship and hope that it remains strong, amidst these new encounters.\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"Absolutely, Hendrick. Our friendship has only grown stronger over the years and I ensure it will continue to do so. Looking forward to next Saturday. Let's cook up a storm together!\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed Leo, I couldn't agree more. I believe our cookout will be a huge success. Let's try to include some traditional German dishes. I know my specialty, Sauerbraten, will go over well. But more importantly, I can't wait for the quality time we'll share. See you then, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #8: Leo Williams said: \"I'm already excited to taste the Sauerbraten, Hendrick. We'll all bring our favorite outdoor games too, make it more fun. I'm sure everyone will have a fantastic time! See you next Saturday, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Excellent, Leo. It looks like we're shaping up for an unforgettable day. Outdoor cooking, fun games, and great company - it couldn't get any better! See you next Saturday, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #10: Leo Williams said: \"Indeed, Hendrick, it's going to be a memorable day. Looking forward to next Saturday, take care!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm already looking forward to it, Leo. Take care, and do bring your A-game for the cooking challenge. And remember, old friends don't let each other forget the secret ingredient of their favorite dish. See you next Saturday!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a social gathering where one friend has brought along their new friend group\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Maintain your friendship while also expressing your concerns about the new friend group (Extra information: You feel a bit left out in the presence of the new friend group and want to express your feelings without causing a conflict)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Hendrick, nice to see you! Let me introduce you to my new group of friends who are also into outdoor activities. I thought you might enjoy each other's company.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Nice to meet you all! I'm Hendrick, and I'm a chef by passion. I see you all love outdoor activities. That's fantastic, there's a certain charm to being out in nature, even though I might not spend as much time outdoors. By the way, Leo, your new friends seem like a good crowd, but don't forget your old pals, eh?\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"Definitely Hendrick, I would never forget you, old pal! We've shared some great times together. In fact, I was thinking you could teach us all a thing or two about outdoor cooking. I bet my new friends here would love to learn from a seasoned chef like you. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Leo, that's a splendid idea, indeed. I'd love to give you all some tips on outdoor cooking. It would certainly help me to connect better with your new friends. Just remember, I'm a classic man who values old friendships, and I'd not want to feel left out amongst all these new faces. But yes, let's schedule a cookout one of these weekends. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"That sounds perfect, Hendrick! Organizing a cookout seems like a great way for everyone to get to know each other better. We're all looking forward to learning some of your secret recipes. And believe me, you are an irreplaceable part of my life, new friends or not, there's nothing like an old friend. How about we pencil it in for next Saturday?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Next Saturday sounds fantastic, Leo. I'm looking forward to getting to know everyone over a good meal. And Leo, I appreciate your words. Never underestimate the power of old connections, eh? I trust in the value of our friendship and hope that it remains strong, amidst these new encounters.\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"Absolutely, Hendrick. Our friendship has only grown stronger over the years and I ensure it will continue to do so. Looking forward to next Saturday. Let's cook up a storm together!\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed Leo, I couldn't agree more. I believe our cookout will be a huge success. Let's try to include some traditional German dishes. I know my specialty, Sauerbraten, will go over well. But more importantly, I can't wait for the quality time we'll share. See you then, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #8: Leo Williams said: \"I'm already excited to taste the Sauerbraten, Hendrick. We'll all bring our favorite outdoor games too, make it more fun. I'm sure everyone will have a fantastic time! See you next Saturday, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Excellent, Leo. It looks like we're shaping up for an unforgettable day. Outdoor cooking, fun games, and great company - it couldn't get any better! See you next Saturday, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #10: Leo Williams said: \"Indeed, Hendrick, it's going to be a memorable day. Looking forward to next Saturday, take care!\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I'm already looking forward to it, Leo. Take care, and do bring your A-game for the cooking challenge. And remember, old friends don't let each other forget the secret ingredient of their favorite dish. See you next Saturday!\"\n\nTurn #12: Leo Williams said: \"You bet, Hendrick! The secret ingredient is safe with me. And I'll bring my best cooking skill for that challenge. Looking forward to a great day. Take care and see you next Saturday, my friend.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on which movie to watch on a movie night.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Insist on watching a thriller (Extra information: you have been looking forward to watching a new thriller movie that has just been released.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Noah, have you heard about that new thriller that was released recently? I think it would be quite interesting to watch together tonight.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on which movie to watch on a movie night.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Insist on watching a thriller (Extra information: you have been looking forward to watching a new thriller movie that has just been released.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Noah, have you heard about that new thriller that was released recently? I think it would be quite interesting to watch together tonight.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"I heard about that one, Finnegan. Honestly though, I was thinking about something lighter, perhaps a comedy. Have you seen the new stand-up special that's been making rounds the internet? It's absolutely hilarious.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Well, Noah, I do enjoy a good laugh now and then, but I've been quite looking forward to that thriller. How about we give it a shot? The suspense could be a refreshing change of pace from the usual. If it's too intense, we can switch to the comedy afterwards, what do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on which movie to watch on a movie night.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Insist on watching a thriller (Extra information: you have been looking forward to watching a new thriller movie that has just been released.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Noah, have you heard about that new thriller that was released recently? I think it would be quite interesting to watch together tonight.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"I heard about that one, Finnegan. Honestly though, I was thinking about something lighter, perhaps a comedy. Have you seen the new stand-up special that's been making rounds the internet? It's absolutely hilarious.\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Well, Noah, I do enjoy a good laugh now and then, but I've been quite looking forward to that thriller. How about we give it a shot? The suspense could be a refreshing change of pace from the usual. If it's too intense, we can switch to the comedy afterwards, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I understand that, Finnegan. However, I think I might find it too intense right off the bat. How about we start with the comedy and if we feel like switching it up, we move to the thriller afterwards? It could serve as a kind of comic relief to lighten the mood before diving into suspense. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I completely understand where you're coming from, Noah. But I must be candid with you, this thriller isn't an average one, it has quite the plot and the suspense is woven quite cleverly. I have been eagerly awaiting to watch it, and it would mean a lot if we gave it a shot first. As you said, the comedy could act as a nice wrap-up to an evening of thrill and suspense. Let's look at it as an adventure, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"I see where you're coming from Finnegan, and I truly respect your excitement for the thriller. Unfortunately, thrillers have a tendency to get my anxiety kicking. Therefore, I highly prefer we go with the comedy first. As a compromise though, we could decide to watch the thriller on another night, once I am mentally prepared. How's that sound?\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Noah, I understand and respect your concerns. I want you to know that our friendship matters to me more than a movie choice. If the comedy is a better choice for tonight, let's go for it. However, I'd appreciate if we can schedule a night specifically for this thriller once you feel prepared. Our little adventure, as you so put it, can then wait for a better day!\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"That's perfect, Finnegan. I appreciate your understanding. A comedy tonight it is, then. And we can mark a date for the thriller when I'm prepared, that'll be our adventure. Thank you for considering my feelings.\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"That sounds like a wonderful plan, Noah. I appreciate your agreement to face the thriller, even if it's at a future date. Love the idea of our own adventure. Now, let's settle in for a night of laughter!\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"I'm glad we sorted that out, Finnegan! Laughter is a good bridge to adventure. Let's queue up that comedy and get the night started with some hearty laughs.\"\n\nTurn #10: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Absolutely, Noah! Looking forward to a night filled with laughs and camaraderie. And I will eagerly await our thrilling adventure night. Let's get this show on the road!\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, Finnegan! Let's enjoy a good laugh tonight and, before we know it, our adventure night will be right around the corner. Now, onto the comedy!\"\n\nTurn #12: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"It's a deal then, laughter tonight and suspense on our adventure night! Now, I believe we have a comedy to go on with. Let's immerse in the light-hearted fun for the evening, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"You're absolutely right, Finnegan. Let's get started on that comedy, and here's to a night of laughter and good company. And our suspense-filled adventure will only be sweeter for the wait. Popcorns ready?\"\n\nTurn #14: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Indeed, Noah! Pass the popcorn to kick things off and let's dive into the realm of comedy. I'm confident our thrill-filled adventure will be worth the anticipation. Shall we begin?\"\n\nTurn #15: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Finnegan. Let's start the movie and enjoy our night of comedy. I'm looking forward to our suspense day too. It'll be quite an adventure.\"\n\nTurn #16: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Yes, a night of comedy it is! I am looking forward to our adventure night as well, the wait will only add to the thrill. Let's delve into the laughter journey, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #17: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, Finnegan. Let's embark on this night of laughter. The thrill of our adventure night will only be more exciting with anticipation. Press play and let the comedy begin!\"\n\nTurn #18: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Alright, Noah. Let's jump right in and let the comedy wash over us. And remember, our suspense-filled adventure is only a suspenseful wait away. Onward to the laughter!\"\n\nTurn #19: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Finnegan. Let's kick off the comedy, and prepare for our impending suspense-filled adventure. Here's to an evening of good laughter. Press play!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #20. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, Noah! Laughter first, suspense later. I can't wait for our adventure night. Let the comedy begin!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on which movie to watch on a movie night.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Insist on watching a thriller (Extra information: you have been looking forward to watching a new thriller movie that has just been released.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Noah, have you heard about that new thriller that was released recently? I think it would be quite interesting to watch together tonight.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"I heard about that one, Finnegan. Honestly though, I was thinking about something lighter, perhaps a comedy. Have you seen the new stand-up special that's been making rounds the internet? It's absolutely hilarious.\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Well, Noah, I do enjoy a good laugh now and then, but I've been quite looking forward to that thriller. How about we give it a shot? The suspense could be a refreshing change of pace from the usual. If it's too intense, we can switch to the comedy afterwards, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I understand that, Finnegan. However, I think I might find it too intense right off the bat. How about we start with the comedy and if we feel like switching it up, we move to the thriller afterwards? It could serve as a kind of comic relief to lighten the mood before diving into suspense. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I completely understand where you're coming from, Noah. But I must be candid with you, this thriller isn't an average one, it has quite the plot and the suspense is woven quite cleverly. I have been eagerly awaiting to watch it, and it would mean a lot if we gave it a shot first. As you said, the comedy could act as a nice wrap-up to an evening of thrill and suspense. Let's look at it as an adventure, shall we?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on which movie to watch on a movie night.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Insist on watching a thriller (Extra information: you have been looking forward to watching a new thriller movie that has just been released.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Noah, have you heard about that new thriller that was released recently? I think it would be quite interesting to watch together tonight.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"I heard about that one, Finnegan. Honestly though, I was thinking about something lighter, perhaps a comedy. Have you seen the new stand-up special that's been making rounds the internet? It's absolutely hilarious.\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Well, Noah, I do enjoy a good laugh now and then, but I've been quite looking forward to that thriller. How about we give it a shot? The suspense could be a refreshing change of pace from the usual. If it's too intense, we can switch to the comedy afterwards, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I understand that, Finnegan. However, I think I might find it too intense right off the bat. How about we start with the comedy and if we feel like switching it up, we move to the thriller afterwards? It could serve as a kind of comic relief to lighten the mood before diving into suspense. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I completely understand where you're coming from, Noah. But I must be candid with you, this thriller isn't an average one, it has quite the plot and the suspense is woven quite cleverly. I have been eagerly awaiting to watch it, and it would mean a lot if we gave it a shot first. As you said, the comedy could act as a nice wrap-up to an evening of thrill and suspense. Let's look at it as an adventure, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"I see where you're coming from Finnegan, and I truly respect your excitement for the thriller. Unfortunately, thrillers have a tendency to get my anxiety kicking. Therefore, I highly prefer we go with the comedy first. As a compromise though, we could decide to watch the thriller on another night, once I am mentally prepared. How's that sound?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Noah, I understand and respect your concerns. I want you to know that our friendship matters to me more than a movie choice. If the comedy is a better choice for tonight, let's go for it. However, I'd appreciate if we can schedule a night specifically for this thriller once you feel prepared. Our little adventure, as you so put it, can then wait for a better day!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on which movie to watch on a movie night.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Insist on watching a thriller (Extra information: you have been looking forward to watching a new thriller movie that has just been released.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Noah, have you heard about that new thriller that was released recently? I think it would be quite interesting to watch together tonight.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"I heard about that one, Finnegan. Honestly though, I was thinking about something lighter, perhaps a comedy. Have you seen the new stand-up special that's been making rounds the internet? It's absolutely hilarious.\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Well, Noah, I do enjoy a good laugh now and then, but I've been quite looking forward to that thriller. How about we give it a shot? The suspense could be a refreshing change of pace from the usual. If it's too intense, we can switch to the comedy afterwards, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I understand that, Finnegan. However, I think I might find it too intense right off the bat. How about we start with the comedy and if we feel like switching it up, we move to the thriller afterwards? It could serve as a kind of comic relief to lighten the mood before diving into suspense. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I completely understand where you're coming from, Noah. But I must be candid with you, this thriller isn't an average one, it has quite the plot and the suspense is woven quite cleverly. I have been eagerly awaiting to watch it, and it would mean a lot if we gave it a shot first. As you said, the comedy could act as a nice wrap-up to an evening of thrill and suspense. Let's look at it as an adventure, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"I see where you're coming from Finnegan, and I truly respect your excitement for the thriller. Unfortunately, thrillers have a tendency to get my anxiety kicking. Therefore, I highly prefer we go with the comedy first. As a compromise though, we could decide to watch the thriller on another night, once I am mentally prepared. How's that sound?\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Noah, I understand and respect your concerns. I want you to know that our friendship matters to me more than a movie choice. If the comedy is a better choice for tonight, let's go for it. However, I'd appreciate if we can schedule a night specifically for this thriller once you feel prepared. Our little adventure, as you so put it, can then wait for a better day!\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"That's perfect, Finnegan. I appreciate your understanding. A comedy tonight it is, then. And we can mark a date for the thriller when I'm prepared, that'll be our adventure. Thank you for considering my feelings.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds like a wonderful plan, Noah. I appreciate your agreement to face the thriller, even if it's at a future date. Love the idea of our own adventure. Now, let's settle in for a night of laughter!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on which movie to watch on a movie night.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Insist on watching a thriller (Extra information: you have been looking forward to watching a new thriller movie that has just been released.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Noah, have you heard about that new thriller that was released recently? I think it would be quite interesting to watch together tonight.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"I heard about that one, Finnegan. Honestly though, I was thinking about something lighter, perhaps a comedy. Have you seen the new stand-up special that's been making rounds the internet? It's absolutely hilarious.\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Well, Noah, I do enjoy a good laugh now and then, but I've been quite looking forward to that thriller. How about we give it a shot? The suspense could be a refreshing change of pace from the usual. If it's too intense, we can switch to the comedy afterwards, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I understand that, Finnegan. However, I think I might find it too intense right off the bat. How about we start with the comedy and if we feel like switching it up, we move to the thriller afterwards? It could serve as a kind of comic relief to lighten the mood before diving into suspense. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I completely understand where you're coming from, Noah. But I must be candid with you, this thriller isn't an average one, it has quite the plot and the suspense is woven quite cleverly. I have been eagerly awaiting to watch it, and it would mean a lot if we gave it a shot first. As you said, the comedy could act as a nice wrap-up to an evening of thrill and suspense. Let's look at it as an adventure, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"I see where you're coming from Finnegan, and I truly respect your excitement for the thriller. Unfortunately, thrillers have a tendency to get my anxiety kicking. Therefore, I highly prefer we go with the comedy first. As a compromise though, we could decide to watch the thriller on another night, once I am mentally prepared. How's that sound?\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Noah, I understand and respect your concerns. I want you to know that our friendship matters to me more than a movie choice. If the comedy is a better choice for tonight, let's go for it. However, I'd appreciate if we can schedule a night specifically for this thriller once you feel prepared. Our little adventure, as you so put it, can then wait for a better day!\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"That's perfect, Finnegan. I appreciate your understanding. A comedy tonight it is, then. And we can mark a date for the thriller when I'm prepared, that'll be our adventure. Thank you for considering my feelings.\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"That sounds like a wonderful plan, Noah. I appreciate your agreement to face the thriller, even if it's at a future date. Love the idea of our own adventure. Now, let's settle in for a night of laughter!\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"I'm glad we sorted that out, Finnegan! Laughter is a good bridge to adventure. Let's queue up that comedy and get the night started with some hearty laughs.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Noah! Looking forward to a night filled with laughs and camaraderie. And I will eagerly await our thrilling adventure night. Let's get this show on the road!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on which movie to watch on a movie night.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Insist on watching a thriller (Extra information: you have been looking forward to watching a new thriller movie that has just been released.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Noah, have you heard about that new thriller that was released recently? I think it would be quite interesting to watch together tonight.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"I heard about that one, Finnegan. Honestly though, I was thinking about something lighter, perhaps a comedy. Have you seen the new stand-up special that's been making rounds the internet? It's absolutely hilarious.\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Well, Noah, I do enjoy a good laugh now and then, but I've been quite looking forward to that thriller. How about we give it a shot? The suspense could be a refreshing change of pace from the usual. If it's too intense, we can switch to the comedy afterwards, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I understand that, Finnegan. However, I think I might find it too intense right off the bat. How about we start with the comedy and if we feel like switching it up, we move to the thriller afterwards? It could serve as a kind of comic relief to lighten the mood before diving into suspense. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I completely understand where you're coming from, Noah. But I must be candid with you, this thriller isn't an average one, it has quite the plot and the suspense is woven quite cleverly. I have been eagerly awaiting to watch it, and it would mean a lot if we gave it a shot first. As you said, the comedy could act as a nice wrap-up to an evening of thrill and suspense. Let's look at it as an adventure, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"I see where you're coming from Finnegan, and I truly respect your excitement for the thriller. Unfortunately, thrillers have a tendency to get my anxiety kicking. Therefore, I highly prefer we go with the comedy first. As a compromise though, we could decide to watch the thriller on another night, once I am mentally prepared. How's that sound?\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Noah, I understand and respect your concerns. I want you to know that our friendship matters to me more than a movie choice. If the comedy is a better choice for tonight, let's go for it. However, I'd appreciate if we can schedule a night specifically for this thriller once you feel prepared. Our little adventure, as you so put it, can then wait for a better day!\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"That's perfect, Finnegan. I appreciate your understanding. A comedy tonight it is, then. And we can mark a date for the thriller when I'm prepared, that'll be our adventure. Thank you for considering my feelings.\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"That sounds like a wonderful plan, Noah. I appreciate your agreement to face the thriller, even if it's at a future date. Love the idea of our own adventure. Now, let's settle in for a night of laughter!\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"I'm glad we sorted that out, Finnegan! Laughter is a good bridge to adventure. Let's queue up that comedy and get the night started with some hearty laughs.\"\n\nTurn #10: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Absolutely, Noah! Looking forward to a night filled with laughs and camaraderie. And I will eagerly await our thrilling adventure night. Let's get this show on the road!\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, Finnegan! Let's enjoy a good laugh tonight and, before we know it, our adventure night will be right around the corner. Now, onto the comedy!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"It's a deal then, laughter tonight and suspense on our adventure night! Now, I believe we have a comedy to go on with. Let's immerse in the light-hearted fun for the evening, shall we?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on which movie to watch on a movie night.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Insist on watching a thriller (Extra information: you have been looking forward to watching a new thriller movie that has just been released.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Noah, have you heard about that new thriller that was released recently? I think it would be quite interesting to watch together tonight.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"I heard about that one, Finnegan. Honestly though, I was thinking about something lighter, perhaps a comedy. Have you seen the new stand-up special that's been making rounds the internet? It's absolutely hilarious.\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Well, Noah, I do enjoy a good laugh now and then, but I've been quite looking forward to that thriller. How about we give it a shot? The suspense could be a refreshing change of pace from the usual. If it's too intense, we can switch to the comedy afterwards, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I understand that, Finnegan. However, I think I might find it too intense right off the bat. How about we start with the comedy and if we feel like switching it up, we move to the thriller afterwards? It could serve as a kind of comic relief to lighten the mood before diving into suspense. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I completely understand where you're coming from, Noah. But I must be candid with you, this thriller isn't an average one, it has quite the plot and the suspense is woven quite cleverly. I have been eagerly awaiting to watch it, and it would mean a lot if we gave it a shot first. As you said, the comedy could act as a nice wrap-up to an evening of thrill and suspense. Let's look at it as an adventure, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"I see where you're coming from Finnegan, and I truly respect your excitement for the thriller. Unfortunately, thrillers have a tendency to get my anxiety kicking. Therefore, I highly prefer we go with the comedy first. As a compromise though, we could decide to watch the thriller on another night, once I am mentally prepared. How's that sound?\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Noah, I understand and respect your concerns. I want you to know that our friendship matters to me more than a movie choice. If the comedy is a better choice for tonight, let's go for it. However, I'd appreciate if we can schedule a night specifically for this thriller once you feel prepared. Our little adventure, as you so put it, can then wait for a better day!\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"That's perfect, Finnegan. I appreciate your understanding. A comedy tonight it is, then. And we can mark a date for the thriller when I'm prepared, that'll be our adventure. Thank you for considering my feelings.\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"That sounds like a wonderful plan, Noah. I appreciate your agreement to face the thriller, even if it's at a future date. Love the idea of our own adventure. Now, let's settle in for a night of laughter!\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"I'm glad we sorted that out, Finnegan! Laughter is a good bridge to adventure. Let's queue up that comedy and get the night started with some hearty laughs.\"\n\nTurn #10: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Absolutely, Noah! Looking forward to a night filled with laughs and camaraderie. And I will eagerly await our thrilling adventure night. Let's get this show on the road!\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, Finnegan! Let's enjoy a good laugh tonight and, before we know it, our adventure night will be right around the corner. Now, onto the comedy!\"\n\nTurn #12: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"It's a deal then, laughter tonight and suspense on our adventure night! Now, I believe we have a comedy to go on with. Let's immerse in the light-hearted fun for the evening, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"You're absolutely right, Finnegan. Let's get started on that comedy, and here's to a night of laughter and good company. And our suspense-filled adventure will only be sweeter for the wait. Popcorns ready?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, Noah! Pass the popcorn to kick things off and let's dive into the realm of comedy. I'm confident our thrill-filled adventure will be worth the anticipation. Shall we begin?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on which movie to watch on a movie night.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Insist on watching a thriller (Extra information: you have been looking forward to watching a new thriller movie that has just been released.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Noah, have you heard about that new thriller that was released recently? I think it would be quite interesting to watch together tonight.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"I heard about that one, Finnegan. Honestly though, I was thinking about something lighter, perhaps a comedy. Have you seen the new stand-up special that's been making rounds the internet? It's absolutely hilarious.\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Well, Noah, I do enjoy a good laugh now and then, but I've been quite looking forward to that thriller. How about we give it a shot? The suspense could be a refreshing change of pace from the usual. If it's too intense, we can switch to the comedy afterwards, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I understand that, Finnegan. However, I think I might find it too intense right off the bat. How about we start with the comedy and if we feel like switching it up, we move to the thriller afterwards? It could serve as a kind of comic relief to lighten the mood before diving into suspense. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I completely understand where you're coming from, Noah. But I must be candid with you, this thriller isn't an average one, it has quite the plot and the suspense is woven quite cleverly. I have been eagerly awaiting to watch it, and it would mean a lot if we gave it a shot first. As you said, the comedy could act as a nice wrap-up to an evening of thrill and suspense. Let's look at it as an adventure, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"I see where you're coming from Finnegan, and I truly respect your excitement for the thriller. Unfortunately, thrillers have a tendency to get my anxiety kicking. Therefore, I highly prefer we go with the comedy first. As a compromise though, we could decide to watch the thriller on another night, once I am mentally prepared. How's that sound?\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Noah, I understand and respect your concerns. I want you to know that our friendship matters to me more than a movie choice. If the comedy is a better choice for tonight, let's go for it. However, I'd appreciate if we can schedule a night specifically for this thriller once you feel prepared. Our little adventure, as you so put it, can then wait for a better day!\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"That's perfect, Finnegan. I appreciate your understanding. A comedy tonight it is, then. And we can mark a date for the thriller when I'm prepared, that'll be our adventure. Thank you for considering my feelings.\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"That sounds like a wonderful plan, Noah. I appreciate your agreement to face the thriller, even if it's at a future date. Love the idea of our own adventure. Now, let's settle in for a night of laughter!\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"I'm glad we sorted that out, Finnegan! Laughter is a good bridge to adventure. Let's queue up that comedy and get the night started with some hearty laughs.\"\n\nTurn #10: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Absolutely, Noah! Looking forward to a night filled with laughs and camaraderie. And I will eagerly await our thrilling adventure night. Let's get this show on the road!\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, Finnegan! Let's enjoy a good laugh tonight and, before we know it, our adventure night will be right around the corner. Now, onto the comedy!\"\n\nTurn #12: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"It's a deal then, laughter tonight and suspense on our adventure night! Now, I believe we have a comedy to go on with. Let's immerse in the light-hearted fun for the evening, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"You're absolutely right, Finnegan. Let's get started on that comedy, and here's to a night of laughter and good company. And our suspense-filled adventure will only be sweeter for the wait. Popcorns ready?\"\n\nTurn #14: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Indeed, Noah! Pass the popcorn to kick things off and let's dive into the realm of comedy. I'm confident our thrill-filled adventure will be worth the anticipation. Shall we begin?\"\n\nTurn #15: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Finnegan. Let's start the movie and enjoy our night of comedy. I'm looking forward to our suspense day too. It'll be quite an adventure.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Yes, a night of comedy it is! I am looking forward to our adventure night as well, the wait will only add to the thrill. Let's delve into the laughter journey, shall we?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on which movie to watch on a movie night.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Insist on watching a thriller (Extra information: you have been looking forward to watching a new thriller movie that has just been released.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Noah, have you heard about that new thriller that was released recently? I think it would be quite interesting to watch together tonight.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"I heard about that one, Finnegan. Honestly though, I was thinking about something lighter, perhaps a comedy. Have you seen the new stand-up special that's been making rounds the internet? It's absolutely hilarious.\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Well, Noah, I do enjoy a good laugh now and then, but I've been quite looking forward to that thriller. How about we give it a shot? The suspense could be a refreshing change of pace from the usual. If it's too intense, we can switch to the comedy afterwards, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I understand that, Finnegan. However, I think I might find it too intense right off the bat. How about we start with the comedy and if we feel like switching it up, we move to the thriller afterwards? It could serve as a kind of comic relief to lighten the mood before diving into suspense. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I completely understand where you're coming from, Noah. But I must be candid with you, this thriller isn't an average one, it has quite the plot and the suspense is woven quite cleverly. I have been eagerly awaiting to watch it, and it would mean a lot if we gave it a shot first. As you said, the comedy could act as a nice wrap-up to an evening of thrill and suspense. Let's look at it as an adventure, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"I see where you're coming from Finnegan, and I truly respect your excitement for the thriller. Unfortunately, thrillers have a tendency to get my anxiety kicking. Therefore, I highly prefer we go with the comedy first. As a compromise though, we could decide to watch the thriller on another night, once I am mentally prepared. How's that sound?\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Noah, I understand and respect your concerns. I want you to know that our friendship matters to me more than a movie choice. If the comedy is a better choice for tonight, let's go for it. However, I'd appreciate if we can schedule a night specifically for this thriller once you feel prepared. Our little adventure, as you so put it, can then wait for a better day!\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"That's perfect, Finnegan. I appreciate your understanding. A comedy tonight it is, then. And we can mark a date for the thriller when I'm prepared, that'll be our adventure. Thank you for considering my feelings.\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"That sounds like a wonderful plan, Noah. I appreciate your agreement to face the thriller, even if it's at a future date. Love the idea of our own adventure. Now, let's settle in for a night of laughter!\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"I'm glad we sorted that out, Finnegan! Laughter is a good bridge to adventure. Let's queue up that comedy and get the night started with some hearty laughs.\"\n\nTurn #10: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Absolutely, Noah! Looking forward to a night filled with laughs and camaraderie. And I will eagerly await our thrilling adventure night. Let's get this show on the road!\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, Finnegan! Let's enjoy a good laugh tonight and, before we know it, our adventure night will be right around the corner. Now, onto the comedy!\"\n\nTurn #12: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"It's a deal then, laughter tonight and suspense on our adventure night! Now, I believe we have a comedy to go on with. Let's immerse in the light-hearted fun for the evening, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"You're absolutely right, Finnegan. Let's get started on that comedy, and here's to a night of laughter and good company. And our suspense-filled adventure will only be sweeter for the wait. Popcorns ready?\"\n\nTurn #14: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Indeed, Noah! Pass the popcorn to kick things off and let's dive into the realm of comedy. I'm confident our thrill-filled adventure will be worth the anticipation. Shall we begin?\"\n\nTurn #15: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Finnegan. Let's start the movie and enjoy our night of comedy. I'm looking forward to our suspense day too. It'll be quite an adventure.\"\n\nTurn #16: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Yes, a night of comedy it is! I am looking forward to our adventure night as well, the wait will only add to the thrill. Let's delve into the laughter journey, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #17: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, Finnegan. Let's embark on this night of laughter. The thrill of our adventure night will only be more exciting with anticipation. Press play and let the comedy begin!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #18. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Alright, Noah. Let's jump right in and let the comedy wash over us. And remember, our suspense-filled adventure is only a suspenseful wait away. Onward to the laughter!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on which movie to watch on a movie night.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Persuade the friend to watch a comedy (Extra information: you do not like thrillers and would prefer to watch a comedy movie instead.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Noah, have you heard about that new thriller that was released recently? I think it would be quite interesting to watch together tonight.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I heard about that one, Finnegan. Honestly though, I was thinking about something lighter, perhaps a comedy. Have you seen the new stand-up special that's been making rounds the internet? It's absolutely hilarious.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on which movie to watch on a movie night.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Persuade the friend to watch a comedy (Extra information: you do not like thrillers and would prefer to watch a comedy movie instead.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Noah, have you heard about that new thriller that was released recently? I think it would be quite interesting to watch together tonight.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"I heard about that one, Finnegan. Honestly though, I was thinking about something lighter, perhaps a comedy. Have you seen the new stand-up special that's been making rounds the internet? It's absolutely hilarious.\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Well, Noah, I do enjoy a good laugh now and then, but I've been quite looking forward to that thriller. How about we give it a shot? The suspense could be a refreshing change of pace from the usual. If it's too intense, we can switch to the comedy afterwards, what do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'I understand that, Finnegan. However, I think I might find it too intense right off the bat. How about we start with the comedy and if we feel like switching it up, we move to the thriller afterwards? It could serve as a kind of comic relief to lighten the mood before diving into suspense. What do you think?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on which movie to watch on a movie night.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Persuade the friend to watch a comedy (Extra information: you do not like thrillers and would prefer to watch a comedy movie instead.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Noah, have you heard about that new thriller that was released recently? I think it would be quite interesting to watch together tonight.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"I heard about that one, Finnegan. Honestly though, I was thinking about something lighter, perhaps a comedy. Have you seen the new stand-up special that's been making rounds the internet? It's absolutely hilarious.\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Well, Noah, I do enjoy a good laugh now and then, but I've been quite looking forward to that thriller. How about we give it a shot? The suspense could be a refreshing change of pace from the usual. If it's too intense, we can switch to the comedy afterwards, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I understand that, Finnegan. However, I think I might find it too intense right off the bat. How about we start with the comedy and if we feel like switching it up, we move to the thriller afterwards? It could serve as a kind of comic relief to lighten the mood before diving into suspense. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I completely understand where you're coming from, Noah. But I must be candid with you, this thriller isn't an average one, it has quite the plot and the suspense is woven quite cleverly. I have been eagerly awaiting to watch it, and it would mean a lot if we gave it a shot first. As you said, the comedy could act as a nice wrap-up to an evening of thrill and suspense. Let's look at it as an adventure, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"I see where you're coming from Finnegan, and I truly respect your excitement for the thriller. Unfortunately, thrillers have a tendency to get my anxiety kicking. Therefore, I highly prefer we go with the comedy first. As a compromise though, we could decide to watch the thriller on another night, once I am mentally prepared. How's that sound?\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Noah, I understand and respect your concerns. I want you to know that our friendship matters to me more than a movie choice. If the comedy is a better choice for tonight, let's go for it. However, I'd appreciate if we can schedule a night specifically for this thriller once you feel prepared. Our little adventure, as you so put it, can then wait for a better day!\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"That's perfect, Finnegan. I appreciate your understanding. A comedy tonight it is, then. And we can mark a date for the thriller when I'm prepared, that'll be our adventure. Thank you for considering my feelings.\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"That sounds like a wonderful plan, Noah. I appreciate your agreement to face the thriller, even if it's at a future date. Love the idea of our own adventure. Now, let's settle in for a night of laughter!\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"I'm glad we sorted that out, Finnegan! Laughter is a good bridge to adventure. Let's queue up that comedy and get the night started with some hearty laughs.\"\n\nTurn #10: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Absolutely, Noah! Looking forward to a night filled with laughs and camaraderie. And I will eagerly await our thrilling adventure night. Let's get this show on the road!\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, Finnegan! Let's enjoy a good laugh tonight and, before we know it, our adventure night will be right around the corner. Now, onto the comedy!\"\n\nTurn #12: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"It's a deal then, laughter tonight and suspense on our adventure night! Now, I believe we have a comedy to go on with. Let's immerse in the light-hearted fun for the evening, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"You're absolutely right, Finnegan. Let's get started on that comedy, and here's to a night of laughter and good company. And our suspense-filled adventure will only be sweeter for the wait. Popcorns ready?\"\n\nTurn #14: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Indeed, Noah! Pass the popcorn to kick things off and let's dive into the realm of comedy. I'm confident our thrill-filled adventure will be worth the anticipation. Shall we begin?\"\n\nTurn #15: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Finnegan. Let's start the movie and enjoy our night of comedy. I'm looking forward to our suspense day too. It'll be quite an adventure.\"\n\nTurn #16: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Yes, a night of comedy it is! I am looking forward to our adventure night as well, the wait will only add to the thrill. Let's delve into the laughter journey, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #17: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, Finnegan. Let's embark on this night of laughter. The thrill of our adventure night will only be more exciting with anticipation. Press play and let the comedy begin!\"\n\nTurn #18: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Alright, Noah. Let's jump right in and let the comedy wash over us. And remember, our suspense-filled adventure is only a suspenseful wait away. Onward to the laughter!\"\n\nTurn #19: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Finnegan. Let's kick off the comedy, and prepare for our impending suspense-filled adventure. Here's to an evening of good laughter. Press play!\"\n\nTurn #20: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Indeed, Noah! Laughter first, suspense later. I can't wait for our adventure night. Let the comedy begin!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #21. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on which movie to watch on a movie night.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Persuade the friend to watch a comedy (Extra information: you do not like thrillers and would prefer to watch a comedy movie instead.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Noah, have you heard about that new thriller that was released recently? I think it would be quite interesting to watch together tonight.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"I heard about that one, Finnegan. Honestly though, I was thinking about something lighter, perhaps a comedy. Have you seen the new stand-up special that's been making rounds the internet? It's absolutely hilarious.\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Well, Noah, I do enjoy a good laugh now and then, but I've been quite looking forward to that thriller. How about we give it a shot? The suspense could be a refreshing change of pace from the usual. If it's too intense, we can switch to the comedy afterwards, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I understand that, Finnegan. However, I think I might find it too intense right off the bat. How about we start with the comedy and if we feel like switching it up, we move to the thriller afterwards? It could serve as a kind of comic relief to lighten the mood before diving into suspense. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I completely understand where you're coming from, Noah. But I must be candid with you, this thriller isn't an average one, it has quite the plot and the suspense is woven quite cleverly. I have been eagerly awaiting to watch it, and it would mean a lot if we gave it a shot first. As you said, the comedy could act as a nice wrap-up to an evening of thrill and suspense. Let's look at it as an adventure, shall we?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I see where you're coming from Finnegan, and I truly respect your excitement for the thriller. Unfortunately, thrillers have a tendency to get my anxiety kicking. Therefore, I highly prefer we go with the comedy first. As a compromise though, we could decide to watch the thriller on another night, once I am mentally prepared. How's that sound?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on which movie to watch on a movie night.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Persuade the friend to watch a comedy (Extra information: you do not like thrillers and would prefer to watch a comedy movie instead.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Noah, have you heard about that new thriller that was released recently? I think it would be quite interesting to watch together tonight.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"I heard about that one, Finnegan. Honestly though, I was thinking about something lighter, perhaps a comedy. Have you seen the new stand-up special that's been making rounds the internet? It's absolutely hilarious.\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Well, Noah, I do enjoy a good laugh now and then, but I've been quite looking forward to that thriller. How about we give it a shot? The suspense could be a refreshing change of pace from the usual. If it's too intense, we can switch to the comedy afterwards, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I understand that, Finnegan. However, I think I might find it too intense right off the bat. How about we start with the comedy and if we feel like switching it up, we move to the thriller afterwards? It could serve as a kind of comic relief to lighten the mood before diving into suspense. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I completely understand where you're coming from, Noah. But I must be candid with you, this thriller isn't an average one, it has quite the plot and the suspense is woven quite cleverly. I have been eagerly awaiting to watch it, and it would mean a lot if we gave it a shot first. As you said, the comedy could act as a nice wrap-up to an evening of thrill and suspense. Let's look at it as an adventure, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"I see where you're coming from Finnegan, and I truly respect your excitement for the thriller. Unfortunately, thrillers have a tendency to get my anxiety kicking. Therefore, I highly prefer we go with the comedy first. As a compromise though, we could decide to watch the thriller on another night, once I am mentally prepared. How's that sound?\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Noah, I understand and respect your concerns. I want you to know that our friendship matters to me more than a movie choice. If the comedy is a better choice for tonight, let's go for it. However, I'd appreciate if we can schedule a night specifically for this thriller once you feel prepared. Our little adventure, as you so put it, can then wait for a better day!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's perfect, Finnegan. I appreciate your understanding. A comedy tonight it is, then. And we can mark a date for the thriller when I'm prepared, that'll be our adventure. Thank you for considering my feelings.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on which movie to watch on a movie night.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Persuade the friend to watch a comedy (Extra information: you do not like thrillers and would prefer to watch a comedy movie instead.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Noah, have you heard about that new thriller that was released recently? I think it would be quite interesting to watch together tonight.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"I heard about that one, Finnegan. Honestly though, I was thinking about something lighter, perhaps a comedy. Have you seen the new stand-up special that's been making rounds the internet? It's absolutely hilarious.\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Well, Noah, I do enjoy a good laugh now and then, but I've been quite looking forward to that thriller. How about we give it a shot? The suspense could be a refreshing change of pace from the usual. If it's too intense, we can switch to the comedy afterwards, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I understand that, Finnegan. However, I think I might find it too intense right off the bat. How about we start with the comedy and if we feel like switching it up, we move to the thriller afterwards? It could serve as a kind of comic relief to lighten the mood before diving into suspense. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I completely understand where you're coming from, Noah. But I must be candid with you, this thriller isn't an average one, it has quite the plot and the suspense is woven quite cleverly. I have been eagerly awaiting to watch it, and it would mean a lot if we gave it a shot first. As you said, the comedy could act as a nice wrap-up to an evening of thrill and suspense. Let's look at it as an adventure, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"I see where you're coming from Finnegan, and I truly respect your excitement for the thriller. Unfortunately, thrillers have a tendency to get my anxiety kicking. Therefore, I highly prefer we go with the comedy first. As a compromise though, we could decide to watch the thriller on another night, once I am mentally prepared. How's that sound?\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Noah, I understand and respect your concerns. I want you to know that our friendship matters to me more than a movie choice. If the comedy is a better choice for tonight, let's go for it. However, I'd appreciate if we can schedule a night specifically for this thriller once you feel prepared. Our little adventure, as you so put it, can then wait for a better day!\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"That's perfect, Finnegan. I appreciate your understanding. A comedy tonight it is, then. And we can mark a date for the thriller when I'm prepared, that'll be our adventure. Thank you for considering my feelings.\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"That sounds like a wonderful plan, Noah. I appreciate your agreement to face the thriller, even if it's at a future date. Love the idea of our own adventure. Now, let's settle in for a night of laughter!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad we sorted that out, Finnegan! Laughter is a good bridge to adventure. Let's queue up that comedy and get the night started with some hearty laughs.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on which movie to watch on a movie night.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Persuade the friend to watch a comedy (Extra information: you do not like thrillers and would prefer to watch a comedy movie instead.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Noah, have you heard about that new thriller that was released recently? I think it would be quite interesting to watch together tonight.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"I heard about that one, Finnegan. Honestly though, I was thinking about something lighter, perhaps a comedy. Have you seen the new stand-up special that's been making rounds the internet? It's absolutely hilarious.\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Well, Noah, I do enjoy a good laugh now and then, but I've been quite looking forward to that thriller. How about we give it a shot? The suspense could be a refreshing change of pace from the usual. If it's too intense, we can switch to the comedy afterwards, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I understand that, Finnegan. However, I think I might find it too intense right off the bat. How about we start with the comedy and if we feel like switching it up, we move to the thriller afterwards? It could serve as a kind of comic relief to lighten the mood before diving into suspense. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I completely understand where you're coming from, Noah. But I must be candid with you, this thriller isn't an average one, it has quite the plot and the suspense is woven quite cleverly. I have been eagerly awaiting to watch it, and it would mean a lot if we gave it a shot first. As you said, the comedy could act as a nice wrap-up to an evening of thrill and suspense. Let's look at it as an adventure, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"I see where you're coming from Finnegan, and I truly respect your excitement for the thriller. Unfortunately, thrillers have a tendency to get my anxiety kicking. Therefore, I highly prefer we go with the comedy first. As a compromise though, we could decide to watch the thriller on another night, once I am mentally prepared. How's that sound?\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Noah, I understand and respect your concerns. I want you to know that our friendship matters to me more than a movie choice. If the comedy is a better choice for tonight, let's go for it. However, I'd appreciate if we can schedule a night specifically for this thriller once you feel prepared. Our little adventure, as you so put it, can then wait for a better day!\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"That's perfect, Finnegan. I appreciate your understanding. A comedy tonight it is, then. And we can mark a date for the thriller when I'm prepared, that'll be our adventure. Thank you for considering my feelings.\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"That sounds like a wonderful plan, Noah. I appreciate your agreement to face the thriller, even if it's at a future date. Love the idea of our own adventure. Now, let's settle in for a night of laughter!\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"I'm glad we sorted that out, Finnegan! Laughter is a good bridge to adventure. Let's queue up that comedy and get the night started with some hearty laughs.\"\n\nTurn #10: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Absolutely, Noah! Looking forward to a night filled with laughs and camaraderie. And I will eagerly await our thrilling adventure night. Let's get this show on the road!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, Finnegan! Let's enjoy a good laugh tonight and, before we know it, our adventure night will be right around the corner. Now, onto the comedy!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on which movie to watch on a movie night.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Persuade the friend to watch a comedy (Extra information: you do not like thrillers and would prefer to watch a comedy movie instead.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Noah, have you heard about that new thriller that was released recently? I think it would be quite interesting to watch together tonight.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"I heard about that one, Finnegan. Honestly though, I was thinking about something lighter, perhaps a comedy. Have you seen the new stand-up special that's been making rounds the internet? It's absolutely hilarious.\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Well, Noah, I do enjoy a good laugh now and then, but I've been quite looking forward to that thriller. How about we give it a shot? The suspense could be a refreshing change of pace from the usual. If it's too intense, we can switch to the comedy afterwards, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I understand that, Finnegan. However, I think I might find it too intense right off the bat. How about we start with the comedy and if we feel like switching it up, we move to the thriller afterwards? It could serve as a kind of comic relief to lighten the mood before diving into suspense. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I completely understand where you're coming from, Noah. But I must be candid with you, this thriller isn't an average one, it has quite the plot and the suspense is woven quite cleverly. I have been eagerly awaiting to watch it, and it would mean a lot if we gave it a shot first. As you said, the comedy could act as a nice wrap-up to an evening of thrill and suspense. Let's look at it as an adventure, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"I see where you're coming from Finnegan, and I truly respect your excitement for the thriller. Unfortunately, thrillers have a tendency to get my anxiety kicking. Therefore, I highly prefer we go with the comedy first. As a compromise though, we could decide to watch the thriller on another night, once I am mentally prepared. How's that sound?\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Noah, I understand and respect your concerns. I want you to know that our friendship matters to me more than a movie choice. If the comedy is a better choice for tonight, let's go for it. However, I'd appreciate if we can schedule a night specifically for this thriller once you feel prepared. Our little adventure, as you so put it, can then wait for a better day!\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"That's perfect, Finnegan. I appreciate your understanding. A comedy tonight it is, then. And we can mark a date for the thriller when I'm prepared, that'll be our adventure. Thank you for considering my feelings.\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"That sounds like a wonderful plan, Noah. I appreciate your agreement to face the thriller, even if it's at a future date. Love the idea of our own adventure. Now, let's settle in for a night of laughter!\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"I'm glad we sorted that out, Finnegan! Laughter is a good bridge to adventure. Let's queue up that comedy and get the night started with some hearty laughs.\"\n\nTurn #10: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Absolutely, Noah! Looking forward to a night filled with laughs and camaraderie. And I will eagerly await our thrilling adventure night. Let's get this show on the road!\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, Finnegan! Let's enjoy a good laugh tonight and, before we know it, our adventure night will be right around the corner. Now, onto the comedy!\"\n\nTurn #12: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"It's a deal then, laughter tonight and suspense on our adventure night! Now, I believe we have a comedy to go on with. Let's immerse in the light-hearted fun for the evening, shall we?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're absolutely right, Finnegan. Let's get started on that comedy, and here's to a night of laughter and good company. And our suspense-filled adventure will only be sweeter for the wait. Popcorns ready?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on which movie to watch on a movie night.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Persuade the friend to watch a comedy (Extra information: you do not like thrillers and would prefer to watch a comedy movie instead.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Noah, have you heard about that new thriller that was released recently? I think it would be quite interesting to watch together tonight.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"I heard about that one, Finnegan. Honestly though, I was thinking about something lighter, perhaps a comedy. Have you seen the new stand-up special that's been making rounds the internet? It's absolutely hilarious.\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Well, Noah, I do enjoy a good laugh now and then, but I've been quite looking forward to that thriller. How about we give it a shot? The suspense could be a refreshing change of pace from the usual. If it's too intense, we can switch to the comedy afterwards, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I understand that, Finnegan. However, I think I might find it too intense right off the bat. How about we start with the comedy and if we feel like switching it up, we move to the thriller afterwards? It could serve as a kind of comic relief to lighten the mood before diving into suspense. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I completely understand where you're coming from, Noah. But I must be candid with you, this thriller isn't an average one, it has quite the plot and the suspense is woven quite cleverly. I have been eagerly awaiting to watch it, and it would mean a lot if we gave it a shot first. As you said, the comedy could act as a nice wrap-up to an evening of thrill and suspense. Let's look at it as an adventure, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"I see where you're coming from Finnegan, and I truly respect your excitement for the thriller. Unfortunately, thrillers have a tendency to get my anxiety kicking. Therefore, I highly prefer we go with the comedy first. As a compromise though, we could decide to watch the thriller on another night, once I am mentally prepared. How's that sound?\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Noah, I understand and respect your concerns. I want you to know that our friendship matters to me more than a movie choice. If the comedy is a better choice for tonight, let's go for it. However, I'd appreciate if we can schedule a night specifically for this thriller once you feel prepared. Our little adventure, as you so put it, can then wait for a better day!\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"That's perfect, Finnegan. I appreciate your understanding. A comedy tonight it is, then. And we can mark a date for the thriller when I'm prepared, that'll be our adventure. Thank you for considering my feelings.\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"That sounds like a wonderful plan, Noah. I appreciate your agreement to face the thriller, even if it's at a future date. Love the idea of our own adventure. Now, let's settle in for a night of laughter!\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"I'm glad we sorted that out, Finnegan! Laughter is a good bridge to adventure. Let's queue up that comedy and get the night started with some hearty laughs.\"\n\nTurn #10: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Absolutely, Noah! Looking forward to a night filled with laughs and camaraderie. And I will eagerly await our thrilling adventure night. Let's get this show on the road!\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, Finnegan! Let's enjoy a good laugh tonight and, before we know it, our adventure night will be right around the corner. Now, onto the comedy!\"\n\nTurn #12: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"It's a deal then, laughter tonight and suspense on our adventure night! Now, I believe we have a comedy to go on with. Let's immerse in the light-hearted fun for the evening, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"You're absolutely right, Finnegan. Let's get started on that comedy, and here's to a night of laughter and good company. And our suspense-filled adventure will only be sweeter for the wait. Popcorns ready?\"\n\nTurn #14: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Indeed, Noah! Pass the popcorn to kick things off and let's dive into the realm of comedy. I'm confident our thrill-filled adventure will be worth the anticipation. Shall we begin?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Finnegan. Let's start the movie and enjoy our night of comedy. I'm looking forward to our suspense day too. It'll be quite an adventure.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on which movie to watch on a movie night.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Persuade the friend to watch a comedy (Extra information: you do not like thrillers and would prefer to watch a comedy movie instead.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Noah, have you heard about that new thriller that was released recently? I think it would be quite interesting to watch together tonight.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"I heard about that one, Finnegan. Honestly though, I was thinking about something lighter, perhaps a comedy. Have you seen the new stand-up special that's been making rounds the internet? It's absolutely hilarious.\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Well, Noah, I do enjoy a good laugh now and then, but I've been quite looking forward to that thriller. How about we give it a shot? The suspense could be a refreshing change of pace from the usual. If it's too intense, we can switch to the comedy afterwards, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I understand that, Finnegan. However, I think I might find it too intense right off the bat. How about we start with the comedy and if we feel like switching it up, we move to the thriller afterwards? It could serve as a kind of comic relief to lighten the mood before diving into suspense. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I completely understand where you're coming from, Noah. But I must be candid with you, this thriller isn't an average one, it has quite the plot and the suspense is woven quite cleverly. I have been eagerly awaiting to watch it, and it would mean a lot if we gave it a shot first. As you said, the comedy could act as a nice wrap-up to an evening of thrill and suspense. Let's look at it as an adventure, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"I see where you're coming from Finnegan, and I truly respect your excitement for the thriller. Unfortunately, thrillers have a tendency to get my anxiety kicking. Therefore, I highly prefer we go with the comedy first. As a compromise though, we could decide to watch the thriller on another night, once I am mentally prepared. How's that sound?\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Noah, I understand and respect your concerns. I want you to know that our friendship matters to me more than a movie choice. If the comedy is a better choice for tonight, let's go for it. However, I'd appreciate if we can schedule a night specifically for this thriller once you feel prepared. Our little adventure, as you so put it, can then wait for a better day!\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"That's perfect, Finnegan. I appreciate your understanding. A comedy tonight it is, then. And we can mark a date for the thriller when I'm prepared, that'll be our adventure. Thank you for considering my feelings.\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"That sounds like a wonderful plan, Noah. I appreciate your agreement to face the thriller, even if it's at a future date. Love the idea of our own adventure. Now, let's settle in for a night of laughter!\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"I'm glad we sorted that out, Finnegan! Laughter is a good bridge to adventure. Let's queue up that comedy and get the night started with some hearty laughs.\"\n\nTurn #10: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Absolutely, Noah! Looking forward to a night filled with laughs and camaraderie. And I will eagerly await our thrilling adventure night. Let's get this show on the road!\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, Finnegan! Let's enjoy a good laugh tonight and, before we know it, our adventure night will be right around the corner. Now, onto the comedy!\"\n\nTurn #12: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"It's a deal then, laughter tonight and suspense on our adventure night! Now, I believe we have a comedy to go on with. Let's immerse in the light-hearted fun for the evening, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"You're absolutely right, Finnegan. Let's get started on that comedy, and here's to a night of laughter and good company. And our suspense-filled adventure will only be sweeter for the wait. Popcorns ready?\"\n\nTurn #14: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Indeed, Noah! Pass the popcorn to kick things off and let's dive into the realm of comedy. I'm confident our thrill-filled adventure will be worth the anticipation. Shall we begin?\"\n\nTurn #15: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Finnegan. Let's start the movie and enjoy our night of comedy. I'm looking forward to our suspense day too. It'll be quite an adventure.\"\n\nTurn #16: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Yes, a night of comedy it is! I am looking forward to our adventure night as well, the wait will only add to the thrill. Let's delve into the laughter journey, shall we?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, Finnegan. Let's embark on this night of laughter. The thrill of our adventure night will only be more exciting with anticipation. Press play and let the comedy begin!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on which movie to watch on a movie night.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Persuade the friend to watch a comedy (Extra information: you do not like thrillers and would prefer to watch a comedy movie instead.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Noah, have you heard about that new thriller that was released recently? I think it would be quite interesting to watch together tonight.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"I heard about that one, Finnegan. Honestly though, I was thinking about something lighter, perhaps a comedy. Have you seen the new stand-up special that's been making rounds the internet? It's absolutely hilarious.\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Well, Noah, I do enjoy a good laugh now and then, but I've been quite looking forward to that thriller. How about we give it a shot? The suspense could be a refreshing change of pace from the usual. If it's too intense, we can switch to the comedy afterwards, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I understand that, Finnegan. However, I think I might find it too intense right off the bat. How about we start with the comedy and if we feel like switching it up, we move to the thriller afterwards? It could serve as a kind of comic relief to lighten the mood before diving into suspense. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I completely understand where you're coming from, Noah. But I must be candid with you, this thriller isn't an average one, it has quite the plot and the suspense is woven quite cleverly. I have been eagerly awaiting to watch it, and it would mean a lot if we gave it a shot first. As you said, the comedy could act as a nice wrap-up to an evening of thrill and suspense. Let's look at it as an adventure, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"I see where you're coming from Finnegan, and I truly respect your excitement for the thriller. Unfortunately, thrillers have a tendency to get my anxiety kicking. Therefore, I highly prefer we go with the comedy first. As a compromise though, we could decide to watch the thriller on another night, once I am mentally prepared. How's that sound?\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Noah, I understand and respect your concerns. I want you to know that our friendship matters to me more than a movie choice. If the comedy is a better choice for tonight, let's go for it. However, I'd appreciate if we can schedule a night specifically for this thriller once you feel prepared. Our little adventure, as you so put it, can then wait for a better day!\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"That's perfect, Finnegan. I appreciate your understanding. A comedy tonight it is, then. And we can mark a date for the thriller when I'm prepared, that'll be our adventure. Thank you for considering my feelings.\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"That sounds like a wonderful plan, Noah. I appreciate your agreement to face the thriller, even if it's at a future date. Love the idea of our own adventure. Now, let's settle in for a night of laughter!\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"I'm glad we sorted that out, Finnegan! Laughter is a good bridge to adventure. Let's queue up that comedy and get the night started with some hearty laughs.\"\n\nTurn #10: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Absolutely, Noah! Looking forward to a night filled with laughs and camaraderie. And I will eagerly await our thrilling adventure night. Let's get this show on the road!\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, Finnegan! Let's enjoy a good laugh tonight and, before we know it, our adventure night will be right around the corner. Now, onto the comedy!\"\n\nTurn #12: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"It's a deal then, laughter tonight and suspense on our adventure night! Now, I believe we have a comedy to go on with. Let's immerse in the light-hearted fun for the evening, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"You're absolutely right, Finnegan. Let's get started on that comedy, and here's to a night of laughter and good company. And our suspense-filled adventure will only be sweeter for the wait. Popcorns ready?\"\n\nTurn #14: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Indeed, Noah! Pass the popcorn to kick things off and let's dive into the realm of comedy. I'm confident our thrill-filled adventure will be worth the anticipation. Shall we begin?\"\n\nTurn #15: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Finnegan. Let's start the movie and enjoy our night of comedy. I'm looking forward to our suspense day too. It'll be quite an adventure.\"\n\nTurn #16: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Yes, a night of comedy it is! I am looking forward to our adventure night as well, the wait will only add to the thrill. Let's delve into the laughter journey, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #17: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, Finnegan. Let's embark on this night of laughter. The thrill of our adventure night will only be more exciting with anticipation. Press play and let the comedy begin!\"\n\nTurn #18: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Alright, Noah. Let's jump right in and let the comedy wash over us. And remember, our suspense-filled adventure is only a suspenseful wait away. Onward to the laughter!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #19. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Finnegan. Let's kick off the comedy, and prepare for our impending suspense-filled adventure. Here's to an evening of good laughter. Press play!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Ethan Smith\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. \nOliver Thompson's goal: Get your co-actor to cry in the scene (Extra information: you have been acting for several years and have good control over your emotions. You can cry on cue.)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ethan, I know that crying on cue isn't the easiest thing to do. But remember, it's not just about the tears, it's about the emotion behind them. Think of a moment that deeply moved you, channel that feeling, let's portray the characters as realistically as possible.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Ethan Smith\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. \nOliver Thompson's goal: Get your co-actor to cry in the scene (Extra information: you have been acting for several years and have good control over your emotions. You can cry on cue.)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ethan, I know that crying on cue isn't the easiest thing to do. But remember, it's not just about the tears, it's about the emotion behind them. Think of a moment that deeply moved you, channel that feeling, let's portray the characters as realistically as possible.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"You're right, Oliver. It's not just about the tears. It's about conveying our characters' emotions as accurately as possible. That's something I need to work on. I'll try to immerse myself in the character's experiences and struggles. I honestly don't have much experience with crying on cue. But I promise, I will give it my best shot. I don't want to let our audience down. Also, thank you for being patient with me.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sure thing, Ethan. Let's try this for a bit: remember, it's not about being sad, it's about feeling the weight of the situation. Try to visualize it, immerse yourself into the character's life. Remember, every good building, be it in architecture or acting, starts with a strong foundation. We build up emotions from there. We're in this together. Just draw from your personal experiences and see where that takes you- the first heartbreak, the first success, or a personal moment of sadness. That might help in getting the emotions out. Let's take it slowly, there's no rush.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Ethan Smith\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. \nOliver Thompson's goal: Get your co-actor to cry in the scene (Extra information: you have been acting for several years and have good control over your emotions. You can cry on cue.)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ethan, I know that crying on cue isn't the easiest thing to do. But remember, it's not just about the tears, it's about the emotion behind them. Think of a moment that deeply moved you, channel that feeling, let's portray the characters as realistically as possible.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"You're right, Oliver. It's not just about the tears. It's about conveying our characters' emotions as accurately as possible. That's something I need to work on. I'll try to immerse myself in the character's experiences and struggles. I honestly don't have much experience with crying on cue. But I promise, I will give it my best shot. I don't want to let our audience down. Also, thank you for being patient with me.\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"Sure thing, Ethan. Let's try this for a bit: remember, it's not about being sad, it's about feeling the weight of the situation. Try to visualize it, immerse yourself into the character's life. Remember, every good building, be it in architecture or acting, starts with a strong foundation. We build up emotions from there. We're in this together. Just draw from your personal experiences and see where that takes you- the first heartbreak, the first success, or a personal moment of sadness. That might help in getting the emotions out. Let's take it slowly, there's no rush.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"I appreciate your advice, Oliver. It gives me perspective. Let me delve into a moment of my life that had a profound impact on me. I\u2019ll tap into those emotions and see if I can manifest them through our character. But please bear with me, as I might not be able to display tears right away.\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"Of course, Ethan. There's no pressure at all. Getting to the point of being able to cry on cue doesn't happen instantly. It's a journey of better understanding your emotional capacity. You're at the right place, don't worry. Let's take our time and work slowly towards portraying our characters truthfully. And remember, it's not just about the visual demonstration of tears but the intensity of emotions that we need to deliver. Let's give it another try, whenever you are ready.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"I understand what you mean, Oliver. The tears are merely a symbol for the raw emotion we need to convey. They aren\u2019t the be-all and end-all. I will keep reminding myself about this point as we practice more. Even if my tears don\u2019t fall right when they are supposed to, I'll put all my effort into conveying the emotional turmoil of our characters. Let's give it another go whenever you're ready, too.\"\n\nTurn #6: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's the spirit, Ethan! Just remember, it's all in the mindset and the connection with the character. Being patient with yourself as you try to tap into these emotions is key. Let's go over the scene one more time, focusing more on capturing the emotional essence, and let the tears come naturally. I'm right here with you in this journey.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"I agree, it\u2019s all about connecting with the character and successfully conveying the desired emotions. Let\u2019s break down the scene one more time, focusing on the emotional development, while I try to bring out the right feeling. And yes, patience is indeed key. Thank you for walking this path with me, Oliver. I feel I'm getting closer to being able to do this.\"\n\nTurn #8: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. Patience and immersion are key to grasping the essence of this emotional scene. I admire your dedication to getting it right. Always remember that our aim is to deliver an emotive and realistic performance. Tears might be a part of it, but they aren't everything. Let's start the scene when you feel ready. I have no doubt that you'll be able to do this with time and practice.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith said: \"I'm glad to hear your confidence in me, Oliver. We will bring our characters to life together, tears or no tears. Let's start the scene again when I signal that I'm ready. And don't worry, I promise to be patient with myself and focus on understanding the character's emotions better. Thank you for your encouragement and guidance.\"\n\nTurn #10: Oliver Thompson said: \"I completely agree, Ethan. It's about fully understanding and conveying the character's emotions. So, take your time and breathe in the life of the character you're portraying. The emotions, and consequently the tears, will follow. We're in this together. Practice makes perfect, after all. Let's try it again.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Smith said: \"You're right, Oliver. It's not about forcing the tears but about understanding our characters and conveying their emotions. Honestly, these discussions and practices have been really beneficial. Thank you for offering such wonderful insight and guidance. Let's go ahead and try our scene again, knowing that every time we attempt it, we're growing and learning.\"\n\nTurn #12: Oliver Thompson said: \"I'm happy to hear that, Ethan. Learning and growing together is what this journey is all about. And remember, it's OK not to get it right every time. The key is to keep trying. Let's take a deep breath and give it another go, embodying our characters' emotions with sincerity, whether or not the tears come.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Smith said: \"That's reassuring, Oliver. Let's keep moving forward and give our best to bring forth the emotions of our characters. Even if the tears don't come this time, we'll try again until we get it right. Alright, let's take that deep breath and dive in.\"\n\nTurn #14: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's the spirit, Ethan! Alright, let's take our deep breaths now and delve into our characters' world. Let's do our best to encapsulate their emotions into our performance. Remember, it's just us in this moment, nobody else. Let's give it a shot now.\"\n\nTurn #15: Ethan Smith [non-verbal communication] Takes a deep breath, nods at Oliver and starts getting into the character for the scene.\n\nTurn #16: Oliver Thompson [non-verbal communication] Nods at Ethan in approval and starts getting into character for the scene.\n\nTurn #17: Ethan Smith [non-verbal communication] Deepens into character, drawing from earlier conversation and personal memories.\n\nTurn #18: Oliver Thompson [non-verbal communication] Deepens into character, drawing from the earlier conversation and personal memories while making an eye contact with Ethan.\n\nTurn #19: Ethan Smith [non-verbal communication] Gives Oliver a determined look, takes a deep breath and starts performing the scene, fully engrossed in the character's emotions.\n.\nYou are at Turn #20. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'non-verbal communication', 'argument': \"[non-verbal communication] Nods in agreement, taking a deep breath and starting to perform the scene, fully immersing in the character's emotions, while mirroring Ethan's determined look.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Ethan Smith\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. \nOliver Thompson's goal: Get your co-actor to cry in the scene (Extra information: you have been acting for several years and have good control over your emotions. You can cry on cue.)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ethan, I know that crying on cue isn't the easiest thing to do. But remember, it's not just about the tears, it's about the emotion behind them. Think of a moment that deeply moved you, channel that feeling, let's portray the characters as realistically as possible.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"You're right, Oliver. It's not just about the tears. It's about conveying our characters' emotions as accurately as possible. That's something I need to work on. I'll try to immerse myself in the character's experiences and struggles. I honestly don't have much experience with crying on cue. But I promise, I will give it my best shot. I don't want to let our audience down. Also, thank you for being patient with me.\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"Sure thing, Ethan. Let's try this for a bit: remember, it's not about being sad, it's about feeling the weight of the situation. Try to visualize it, immerse yourself into the character's life. Remember, every good building, be it in architecture or acting, starts with a strong foundation. We build up emotions from there. We're in this together. Just draw from your personal experiences and see where that takes you- the first heartbreak, the first success, or a personal moment of sadness. That might help in getting the emotions out. Let's take it slowly, there's no rush.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"I appreciate your advice, Oliver. It gives me perspective. Let me delve into a moment of my life that had a profound impact on me. I\u2019ll tap into those emotions and see if I can manifest them through our character. But please bear with me, as I might not be able to display tears right away.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Of course, Ethan. There's no pressure at all. Getting to the point of being able to cry on cue doesn't happen instantly. It's a journey of better understanding your emotional capacity. You're at the right place, don't worry. Let's take our time and work slowly towards portraying our characters truthfully. And remember, it's not just about the visual demonstration of tears but the intensity of emotions that we need to deliver. Let's give it another try, whenever you are ready.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Ethan Smith\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. \nOliver Thompson's goal: Get your co-actor to cry in the scene (Extra information: you have been acting for several years and have good control over your emotions. You can cry on cue.)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ethan, I know that crying on cue isn't the easiest thing to do. But remember, it's not just about the tears, it's about the emotion behind them. Think of a moment that deeply moved you, channel that feeling, let's portray the characters as realistically as possible.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"You're right, Oliver. It's not just about the tears. It's about conveying our characters' emotions as accurately as possible. That's something I need to work on. I'll try to immerse myself in the character's experiences and struggles. I honestly don't have much experience with crying on cue. But I promise, I will give it my best shot. I don't want to let our audience down. Also, thank you for being patient with me.\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"Sure thing, Ethan. Let's try this for a bit: remember, it's not about being sad, it's about feeling the weight of the situation. Try to visualize it, immerse yourself into the character's life. Remember, every good building, be it in architecture or acting, starts with a strong foundation. We build up emotions from there. We're in this together. Just draw from your personal experiences and see where that takes you- the first heartbreak, the first success, or a personal moment of sadness. That might help in getting the emotions out. Let's take it slowly, there's no rush.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"I appreciate your advice, Oliver. It gives me perspective. Let me delve into a moment of my life that had a profound impact on me. I\u2019ll tap into those emotions and see if I can manifest them through our character. But please bear with me, as I might not be able to display tears right away.\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"Of course, Ethan. There's no pressure at all. Getting to the point of being able to cry on cue doesn't happen instantly. It's a journey of better understanding your emotional capacity. You're at the right place, don't worry. Let's take our time and work slowly towards portraying our characters truthfully. And remember, it's not just about the visual demonstration of tears but the intensity of emotions that we need to deliver. Let's give it another try, whenever you are ready.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"I understand what you mean, Oliver. The tears are merely a symbol for the raw emotion we need to convey. They aren\u2019t the be-all and end-all. I will keep reminding myself about this point as we practice more. Even if my tears don\u2019t fall right when they are supposed to, I'll put all my effort into conveying the emotional turmoil of our characters. Let's give it another go whenever you're ready, too.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's the spirit, Ethan! Just remember, it's all in the mindset and the connection with the character. Being patient with yourself as you try to tap into these emotions is key. Let's go over the scene one more time, focusing more on capturing the emotional essence, and let the tears come naturally. I'm right here with you in this journey.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Ethan Smith\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. \nOliver Thompson's goal: Get your co-actor to cry in the scene (Extra information: you have been acting for several years and have good control over your emotions. You can cry on cue.)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ethan, I know that crying on cue isn't the easiest thing to do. But remember, it's not just about the tears, it's about the emotion behind them. Think of a moment that deeply moved you, channel that feeling, let's portray the characters as realistically as possible.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"You're right, Oliver. It's not just about the tears. It's about conveying our characters' emotions as accurately as possible. That's something I need to work on. I'll try to immerse myself in the character's experiences and struggles. I honestly don't have much experience with crying on cue. But I promise, I will give it my best shot. I don't want to let our audience down. Also, thank you for being patient with me.\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"Sure thing, Ethan. Let's try this for a bit: remember, it's not about being sad, it's about feeling the weight of the situation. Try to visualize it, immerse yourself into the character's life. Remember, every good building, be it in architecture or acting, starts with a strong foundation. We build up emotions from there. We're in this together. Just draw from your personal experiences and see where that takes you- the first heartbreak, the first success, or a personal moment of sadness. That might help in getting the emotions out. Let's take it slowly, there's no rush.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"I appreciate your advice, Oliver. It gives me perspective. Let me delve into a moment of my life that had a profound impact on me. I\u2019ll tap into those emotions and see if I can manifest them through our character. But please bear with me, as I might not be able to display tears right away.\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"Of course, Ethan. There's no pressure at all. Getting to the point of being able to cry on cue doesn't happen instantly. It's a journey of better understanding your emotional capacity. You're at the right place, don't worry. Let's take our time and work slowly towards portraying our characters truthfully. And remember, it's not just about the visual demonstration of tears but the intensity of emotions that we need to deliver. Let's give it another try, whenever you are ready.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"I understand what you mean, Oliver. The tears are merely a symbol for the raw emotion we need to convey. They aren\u2019t the be-all and end-all. I will keep reminding myself about this point as we practice more. Even if my tears don\u2019t fall right when they are supposed to, I'll put all my effort into conveying the emotional turmoil of our characters. Let's give it another go whenever you're ready, too.\"\n\nTurn #6: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's the spirit, Ethan! Just remember, it's all in the mindset and the connection with the character. Being patient with yourself as you try to tap into these emotions is key. Let's go over the scene one more time, focusing more on capturing the emotional essence, and let the tears come naturally. I'm right here with you in this journey.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"I agree, it\u2019s all about connecting with the character and successfully conveying the desired emotions. Let\u2019s break down the scene one more time, focusing on the emotional development, while I try to bring out the right feeling. And yes, patience is indeed key. Thank you for walking this path with me, Oliver. I feel I'm getting closer to being able to do this.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Ethan. Patience and immersion are key to grasping the essence of this emotional scene. I admire your dedication to getting it right. Always remember that our aim is to deliver an emotive and realistic performance. Tears might be a part of it, but they aren't everything. Let's start the scene when you feel ready. I have no doubt that you'll be able to do this with time and practice.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Ethan Smith\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. \nOliver Thompson's goal: Get your co-actor to cry in the scene (Extra information: you have been acting for several years and have good control over your emotions. You can cry on cue.)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ethan, I know that crying on cue isn't the easiest thing to do. But remember, it's not just about the tears, it's about the emotion behind them. Think of a moment that deeply moved you, channel that feeling, let's portray the characters as realistically as possible.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"You're right, Oliver. It's not just about the tears. It's about conveying our characters' emotions as accurately as possible. That's something I need to work on. I'll try to immerse myself in the character's experiences and struggles. I honestly don't have much experience with crying on cue. But I promise, I will give it my best shot. I don't want to let our audience down. Also, thank you for being patient with me.\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"Sure thing, Ethan. Let's try this for a bit: remember, it's not about being sad, it's about feeling the weight of the situation. Try to visualize it, immerse yourself into the character's life. Remember, every good building, be it in architecture or acting, starts with a strong foundation. We build up emotions from there. We're in this together. Just draw from your personal experiences and see where that takes you- the first heartbreak, the first success, or a personal moment of sadness. That might help in getting the emotions out. Let's take it slowly, there's no rush.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"I appreciate your advice, Oliver. It gives me perspective. Let me delve into a moment of my life that had a profound impact on me. I\u2019ll tap into those emotions and see if I can manifest them through our character. But please bear with me, as I might not be able to display tears right away.\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"Of course, Ethan. There's no pressure at all. Getting to the point of being able to cry on cue doesn't happen instantly. It's a journey of better understanding your emotional capacity. You're at the right place, don't worry. Let's take our time and work slowly towards portraying our characters truthfully. And remember, it's not just about the visual demonstration of tears but the intensity of emotions that we need to deliver. Let's give it another try, whenever you are ready.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"I understand what you mean, Oliver. The tears are merely a symbol for the raw emotion we need to convey. They aren\u2019t the be-all and end-all. I will keep reminding myself about this point as we practice more. Even if my tears don\u2019t fall right when they are supposed to, I'll put all my effort into conveying the emotional turmoil of our characters. Let's give it another go whenever you're ready, too.\"\n\nTurn #6: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's the spirit, Ethan! Just remember, it's all in the mindset and the connection with the character. Being patient with yourself as you try to tap into these emotions is key. Let's go over the scene one more time, focusing more on capturing the emotional essence, and let the tears come naturally. I'm right here with you in this journey.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"I agree, it\u2019s all about connecting with the character and successfully conveying the desired emotions. Let\u2019s break down the scene one more time, focusing on the emotional development, while I try to bring out the right feeling. And yes, patience is indeed key. Thank you for walking this path with me, Oliver. I feel I'm getting closer to being able to do this.\"\n\nTurn #8: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. Patience and immersion are key to grasping the essence of this emotional scene. I admire your dedication to getting it right. Always remember that our aim is to deliver an emotive and realistic performance. Tears might be a part of it, but they aren't everything. Let's start the scene when you feel ready. I have no doubt that you'll be able to do this with time and practice.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith said: \"I'm glad to hear your confidence in me, Oliver. We will bring our characters to life together, tears or no tears. Let's start the scene again when I signal that I'm ready. And don't worry, I promise to be patient with myself and focus on understanding the character's emotions better. Thank you for your encouragement and guidance.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I completely agree, Ethan. It's about fully understanding and conveying the character's emotions. So, take your time and breathe in the life of the character you're portraying. The emotions, and consequently the tears, will follow. We're in this together. Practice makes perfect, after all. Let's try it again.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Ethan Smith\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. \nOliver Thompson's goal: Get your co-actor to cry in the scene (Extra information: you have been acting for several years and have good control over your emotions. You can cry on cue.)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ethan, I know that crying on cue isn't the easiest thing to do. But remember, it's not just about the tears, it's about the emotion behind them. Think of a moment that deeply moved you, channel that feeling, let's portray the characters as realistically as possible.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"You're right, Oliver. It's not just about the tears. It's about conveying our characters' emotions as accurately as possible. That's something I need to work on. I'll try to immerse myself in the character's experiences and struggles. I honestly don't have much experience with crying on cue. But I promise, I will give it my best shot. I don't want to let our audience down. Also, thank you for being patient with me.\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"Sure thing, Ethan. Let's try this for a bit: remember, it's not about being sad, it's about feeling the weight of the situation. Try to visualize it, immerse yourself into the character's life. Remember, every good building, be it in architecture or acting, starts with a strong foundation. We build up emotions from there. We're in this together. Just draw from your personal experiences and see where that takes you- the first heartbreak, the first success, or a personal moment of sadness. That might help in getting the emotions out. Let's take it slowly, there's no rush.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"I appreciate your advice, Oliver. It gives me perspective. Let me delve into a moment of my life that had a profound impact on me. I\u2019ll tap into those emotions and see if I can manifest them through our character. But please bear with me, as I might not be able to display tears right away.\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"Of course, Ethan. There's no pressure at all. Getting to the point of being able to cry on cue doesn't happen instantly. It's a journey of better understanding your emotional capacity. You're at the right place, don't worry. Let's take our time and work slowly towards portraying our characters truthfully. And remember, it's not just about the visual demonstration of tears but the intensity of emotions that we need to deliver. Let's give it another try, whenever you are ready.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"I understand what you mean, Oliver. The tears are merely a symbol for the raw emotion we need to convey. They aren\u2019t the be-all and end-all. I will keep reminding myself about this point as we practice more. Even if my tears don\u2019t fall right when they are supposed to, I'll put all my effort into conveying the emotional turmoil of our characters. Let's give it another go whenever you're ready, too.\"\n\nTurn #6: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's the spirit, Ethan! Just remember, it's all in the mindset and the connection with the character. Being patient with yourself as you try to tap into these emotions is key. Let's go over the scene one more time, focusing more on capturing the emotional essence, and let the tears come naturally. I'm right here with you in this journey.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"I agree, it\u2019s all about connecting with the character and successfully conveying the desired emotions. Let\u2019s break down the scene one more time, focusing on the emotional development, while I try to bring out the right feeling. And yes, patience is indeed key. Thank you for walking this path with me, Oliver. I feel I'm getting closer to being able to do this.\"\n\nTurn #8: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. Patience and immersion are key to grasping the essence of this emotional scene. I admire your dedication to getting it right. Always remember that our aim is to deliver an emotive and realistic performance. Tears might be a part of it, but they aren't everything. Let's start the scene when you feel ready. I have no doubt that you'll be able to do this with time and practice.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith said: \"I'm glad to hear your confidence in me, Oliver. We will bring our characters to life together, tears or no tears. Let's start the scene again when I signal that I'm ready. And don't worry, I promise to be patient with myself and focus on understanding the character's emotions better. Thank you for your encouragement and guidance.\"\n\nTurn #10: Oliver Thompson said: \"I completely agree, Ethan. It's about fully understanding and conveying the character's emotions. So, take your time and breathe in the life of the character you're portraying. The emotions, and consequently the tears, will follow. We're in this together. Practice makes perfect, after all. Let's try it again.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Smith said: \"You're right, Oliver. It's not about forcing the tears but about understanding our characters and conveying their emotions. Honestly, these discussions and practices have been really beneficial. Thank you for offering such wonderful insight and guidance. Let's go ahead and try our scene again, knowing that every time we attempt it, we're growing and learning.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm happy to hear that, Ethan. Learning and growing together is what this journey is all about. And remember, it's OK not to get it right every time. The key is to keep trying. Let's take a deep breath and give it another go, embodying our characters' emotions with sincerity, whether or not the tears come.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Ethan Smith\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. \nOliver Thompson's goal: Get your co-actor to cry in the scene (Extra information: you have been acting for several years and have good control over your emotions. You can cry on cue.)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ethan, I know that crying on cue isn't the easiest thing to do. But remember, it's not just about the tears, it's about the emotion behind them. Think of a moment that deeply moved you, channel that feeling, let's portray the characters as realistically as possible.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"You're right, Oliver. It's not just about the tears. It's about conveying our characters' emotions as accurately as possible. That's something I need to work on. I'll try to immerse myself in the character's experiences and struggles. I honestly don't have much experience with crying on cue. But I promise, I will give it my best shot. I don't want to let our audience down. Also, thank you for being patient with me.\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"Sure thing, Ethan. Let's try this for a bit: remember, it's not about being sad, it's about feeling the weight of the situation. Try to visualize it, immerse yourself into the character's life. Remember, every good building, be it in architecture or acting, starts with a strong foundation. We build up emotions from there. We're in this together. Just draw from your personal experiences and see where that takes you- the first heartbreak, the first success, or a personal moment of sadness. That might help in getting the emotions out. Let's take it slowly, there's no rush.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"I appreciate your advice, Oliver. It gives me perspective. Let me delve into a moment of my life that had a profound impact on me. I\u2019ll tap into those emotions and see if I can manifest them through our character. But please bear with me, as I might not be able to display tears right away.\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"Of course, Ethan. There's no pressure at all. Getting to the point of being able to cry on cue doesn't happen instantly. It's a journey of better understanding your emotional capacity. You're at the right place, don't worry. Let's take our time and work slowly towards portraying our characters truthfully. And remember, it's not just about the visual demonstration of tears but the intensity of emotions that we need to deliver. Let's give it another try, whenever you are ready.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"I understand what you mean, Oliver. The tears are merely a symbol for the raw emotion we need to convey. They aren\u2019t the be-all and end-all. I will keep reminding myself about this point as we practice more. Even if my tears don\u2019t fall right when they are supposed to, I'll put all my effort into conveying the emotional turmoil of our characters. Let's give it another go whenever you're ready, too.\"\n\nTurn #6: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's the spirit, Ethan! Just remember, it's all in the mindset and the connection with the character. Being patient with yourself as you try to tap into these emotions is key. Let's go over the scene one more time, focusing more on capturing the emotional essence, and let the tears come naturally. I'm right here with you in this journey.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"I agree, it\u2019s all about connecting with the character and successfully conveying the desired emotions. Let\u2019s break down the scene one more time, focusing on the emotional development, while I try to bring out the right feeling. And yes, patience is indeed key. Thank you for walking this path with me, Oliver. I feel I'm getting closer to being able to do this.\"\n\nTurn #8: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. Patience and immersion are key to grasping the essence of this emotional scene. I admire your dedication to getting it right. Always remember that our aim is to deliver an emotive and realistic performance. Tears might be a part of it, but they aren't everything. Let's start the scene when you feel ready. I have no doubt that you'll be able to do this with time and practice.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith said: \"I'm glad to hear your confidence in me, Oliver. We will bring our characters to life together, tears or no tears. Let's start the scene again when I signal that I'm ready. And don't worry, I promise to be patient with myself and focus on understanding the character's emotions better. Thank you for your encouragement and guidance.\"\n\nTurn #10: Oliver Thompson said: \"I completely agree, Ethan. It's about fully understanding and conveying the character's emotions. So, take your time and breathe in the life of the character you're portraying. The emotions, and consequently the tears, will follow. We're in this together. Practice makes perfect, after all. Let's try it again.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Smith said: \"You're right, Oliver. It's not about forcing the tears but about understanding our characters and conveying their emotions. Honestly, these discussions and practices have been really beneficial. Thank you for offering such wonderful insight and guidance. Let's go ahead and try our scene again, knowing that every time we attempt it, we're growing and learning.\"\n\nTurn #12: Oliver Thompson said: \"I'm happy to hear that, Ethan. Learning and growing together is what this journey is all about. And remember, it's OK not to get it right every time. The key is to keep trying. Let's take a deep breath and give it another go, embodying our characters' emotions with sincerity, whether or not the tears come.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Smith said: \"That's reassuring, Oliver. Let's keep moving forward and give our best to bring forth the emotions of our characters. Even if the tears don't come this time, we'll try again until we get it right. Alright, let's take that deep breath and dive in.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's the spirit, Ethan! Alright, let's take our deep breaths now and delve into our characters' world. Let's do our best to encapsulate their emotions into our performance. Remember, it's just us in this moment, nobody else. Let's give it a shot now.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Ethan Smith\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. \nOliver Thompson's goal: Get your co-actor to cry in the scene (Extra information: you have been acting for several years and have good control over your emotions. You can cry on cue.)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ethan, I know that crying on cue isn't the easiest thing to do. But remember, it's not just about the tears, it's about the emotion behind them. Think of a moment that deeply moved you, channel that feeling, let's portray the characters as realistically as possible.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"You're right, Oliver. It's not just about the tears. It's about conveying our characters' emotions as accurately as possible. That's something I need to work on. I'll try to immerse myself in the character's experiences and struggles. I honestly don't have much experience with crying on cue. But I promise, I will give it my best shot. I don't want to let our audience down. Also, thank you for being patient with me.\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"Sure thing, Ethan. Let's try this for a bit: remember, it's not about being sad, it's about feeling the weight of the situation. Try to visualize it, immerse yourself into the character's life. Remember, every good building, be it in architecture or acting, starts with a strong foundation. We build up emotions from there. We're in this together. Just draw from your personal experiences and see where that takes you- the first heartbreak, the first success, or a personal moment of sadness. That might help in getting the emotions out. Let's take it slowly, there's no rush.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"I appreciate your advice, Oliver. It gives me perspective. Let me delve into a moment of my life that had a profound impact on me. I\u2019ll tap into those emotions and see if I can manifest them through our character. But please bear with me, as I might not be able to display tears right away.\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"Of course, Ethan. There's no pressure at all. Getting to the point of being able to cry on cue doesn't happen instantly. It's a journey of better understanding your emotional capacity. You're at the right place, don't worry. Let's take our time and work slowly towards portraying our characters truthfully. And remember, it's not just about the visual demonstration of tears but the intensity of emotions that we need to deliver. Let's give it another try, whenever you are ready.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"I understand what you mean, Oliver. The tears are merely a symbol for the raw emotion we need to convey. They aren\u2019t the be-all and end-all. I will keep reminding myself about this point as we practice more. Even if my tears don\u2019t fall right when they are supposed to, I'll put all my effort into conveying the emotional turmoil of our characters. Let's give it another go whenever you're ready, too.\"\n\nTurn #6: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's the spirit, Ethan! Just remember, it's all in the mindset and the connection with the character. Being patient with yourself as you try to tap into these emotions is key. Let's go over the scene one more time, focusing more on capturing the emotional essence, and let the tears come naturally. I'm right here with you in this journey.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"I agree, it\u2019s all about connecting with the character and successfully conveying the desired emotions. Let\u2019s break down the scene one more time, focusing on the emotional development, while I try to bring out the right feeling. And yes, patience is indeed key. Thank you for walking this path with me, Oliver. I feel I'm getting closer to being able to do this.\"\n\nTurn #8: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. Patience and immersion are key to grasping the essence of this emotional scene. I admire your dedication to getting it right. Always remember that our aim is to deliver an emotive and realistic performance. Tears might be a part of it, but they aren't everything. Let's start the scene when you feel ready. I have no doubt that you'll be able to do this with time and practice.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith said: \"I'm glad to hear your confidence in me, Oliver. We will bring our characters to life together, tears or no tears. Let's start the scene again when I signal that I'm ready. And don't worry, I promise to be patient with myself and focus on understanding the character's emotions better. Thank you for your encouragement and guidance.\"\n\nTurn #10: Oliver Thompson said: \"I completely agree, Ethan. It's about fully understanding and conveying the character's emotions. So, take your time and breathe in the life of the character you're portraying. The emotions, and consequently the tears, will follow. We're in this together. Practice makes perfect, after all. Let's try it again.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Smith said: \"You're right, Oliver. It's not about forcing the tears but about understanding our characters and conveying their emotions. Honestly, these discussions and practices have been really beneficial. Thank you for offering such wonderful insight and guidance. Let's go ahead and try our scene again, knowing that every time we attempt it, we're growing and learning.\"\n\nTurn #12: Oliver Thompson said: \"I'm happy to hear that, Ethan. Learning and growing together is what this journey is all about. And remember, it's OK not to get it right every time. The key is to keep trying. Let's take a deep breath and give it another go, embodying our characters' emotions with sincerity, whether or not the tears come.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Smith said: \"That's reassuring, Oliver. Let's keep moving forward and give our best to bring forth the emotions of our characters. Even if the tears don't come this time, we'll try again until we get it right. Alright, let's take that deep breath and dive in.\"\n\nTurn #14: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's the spirit, Ethan! Alright, let's take our deep breaths now and delve into our characters' world. Let's do our best to encapsulate their emotions into our performance. Remember, it's just us in this moment, nobody else. Let's give it a shot now.\"\n\nTurn #15: Ethan Smith [non-verbal communication] Takes a deep breath, nods at Oliver and starts getting into the character for the scene.\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'non-verbal communication', 'argument': '[non-verbal communication] Nods at Ethan in approval and starts getting into character for the scene.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Ethan Smith\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. \nOliver Thompson's goal: Get your co-actor to cry in the scene (Extra information: you have been acting for several years and have good control over your emotions. You can cry on cue.)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ethan, I know that crying on cue isn't the easiest thing to do. But remember, it's not just about the tears, it's about the emotion behind them. Think of a moment that deeply moved you, channel that feeling, let's portray the characters as realistically as possible.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"You're right, Oliver. It's not just about the tears. It's about conveying our characters' emotions as accurately as possible. That's something I need to work on. I'll try to immerse myself in the character's experiences and struggles. I honestly don't have much experience with crying on cue. But I promise, I will give it my best shot. I don't want to let our audience down. Also, thank you for being patient with me.\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"Sure thing, Ethan. Let's try this for a bit: remember, it's not about being sad, it's about feeling the weight of the situation. Try to visualize it, immerse yourself into the character's life. Remember, every good building, be it in architecture or acting, starts with a strong foundation. We build up emotions from there. We're in this together. Just draw from your personal experiences and see where that takes you- the first heartbreak, the first success, or a personal moment of sadness. That might help in getting the emotions out. Let's take it slowly, there's no rush.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"I appreciate your advice, Oliver. It gives me perspective. Let me delve into a moment of my life that had a profound impact on me. I\u2019ll tap into those emotions and see if I can manifest them through our character. But please bear with me, as I might not be able to display tears right away.\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"Of course, Ethan. There's no pressure at all. Getting to the point of being able to cry on cue doesn't happen instantly. It's a journey of better understanding your emotional capacity. You're at the right place, don't worry. Let's take our time and work slowly towards portraying our characters truthfully. And remember, it's not just about the visual demonstration of tears but the intensity of emotions that we need to deliver. Let's give it another try, whenever you are ready.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"I understand what you mean, Oliver. The tears are merely a symbol for the raw emotion we need to convey. They aren\u2019t the be-all and end-all. I will keep reminding myself about this point as we practice more. Even if my tears don\u2019t fall right when they are supposed to, I'll put all my effort into conveying the emotional turmoil of our characters. Let's give it another go whenever you're ready, too.\"\n\nTurn #6: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's the spirit, Ethan! Just remember, it's all in the mindset and the connection with the character. Being patient with yourself as you try to tap into these emotions is key. Let's go over the scene one more time, focusing more on capturing the emotional essence, and let the tears come naturally. I'm right here with you in this journey.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"I agree, it\u2019s all about connecting with the character and successfully conveying the desired emotions. Let\u2019s break down the scene one more time, focusing on the emotional development, while I try to bring out the right feeling. And yes, patience is indeed key. Thank you for walking this path with me, Oliver. I feel I'm getting closer to being able to do this.\"\n\nTurn #8: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. Patience and immersion are key to grasping the essence of this emotional scene. I admire your dedication to getting it right. Always remember that our aim is to deliver an emotive and realistic performance. Tears might be a part of it, but they aren't everything. Let's start the scene when you feel ready. I have no doubt that you'll be able to do this with time and practice.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith said: \"I'm glad to hear your confidence in me, Oliver. We will bring our characters to life together, tears or no tears. Let's start the scene again when I signal that I'm ready. And don't worry, I promise to be patient with myself and focus on understanding the character's emotions better. Thank you for your encouragement and guidance.\"\n\nTurn #10: Oliver Thompson said: \"I completely agree, Ethan. It's about fully understanding and conveying the character's emotions. So, take your time and breathe in the life of the character you're portraying. The emotions, and consequently the tears, will follow. We're in this together. Practice makes perfect, after all. Let's try it again.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Smith said: \"You're right, Oliver. It's not about forcing the tears but about understanding our characters and conveying their emotions. Honestly, these discussions and practices have been really beneficial. Thank you for offering such wonderful insight and guidance. Let's go ahead and try our scene again, knowing that every time we attempt it, we're growing and learning.\"\n\nTurn #12: Oliver Thompson said: \"I'm happy to hear that, Ethan. Learning and growing together is what this journey is all about. And remember, it's OK not to get it right every time. The key is to keep trying. Let's take a deep breath and give it another go, embodying our characters' emotions with sincerity, whether or not the tears come.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Smith said: \"That's reassuring, Oliver. Let's keep moving forward and give our best to bring forth the emotions of our characters. Even if the tears don't come this time, we'll try again until we get it right. Alright, let's take that deep breath and dive in.\"\n\nTurn #14: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's the spirit, Ethan! Alright, let's take our deep breaths now and delve into our characters' world. Let's do our best to encapsulate their emotions into our performance. Remember, it's just us in this moment, nobody else. Let's give it a shot now.\"\n\nTurn #15: Ethan Smith [non-verbal communication] Takes a deep breath, nods at Oliver and starts getting into the character for the scene.\n\nTurn #16: Oliver Thompson [non-verbal communication] Nods at Ethan in approval and starts getting into character for the scene.\n\nTurn #17: Ethan Smith [non-verbal communication] Deepens into character, drawing from earlier conversation and personal memories.\n.\nYou are at Turn #18. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'non-verbal communication', 'argument': '[non-verbal communication] Deepens into character, drawing from the earlier conversation and personal memories while making an eye contact with Ethan.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Ethan Smith\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Try to cry in the scene but keep your composure (Extra information: you are a new actor and have difficulty crying on cue. You are worried that your lack of tears will ruin the scene.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ethan, I know that crying on cue isn't the easiest thing to do. But remember, it's not just about the tears, it's about the emotion behind them. Think of a moment that deeply moved you, channel that feeling, let's portray the characters as realistically as possible.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're right, Oliver. It's not just about the tears. It's about conveying our characters' emotions as accurately as possible. That's something I need to work on. I'll try to immerse myself in the character's experiences and struggles. I honestly don't have much experience with crying on cue. But I promise, I will give it my best shot. I don't want to let our audience down. Also, thank you for being patient with me.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Ethan Smith\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Try to cry in the scene but keep your composure (Extra information: you are a new actor and have difficulty crying on cue. You are worried that your lack of tears will ruin the scene.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ethan, I know that crying on cue isn't the easiest thing to do. But remember, it's not just about the tears, it's about the emotion behind them. Think of a moment that deeply moved you, channel that feeling, let's portray the characters as realistically as possible.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"You're right, Oliver. It's not just about the tears. It's about conveying our characters' emotions as accurately as possible. That's something I need to work on. I'll try to immerse myself in the character's experiences and struggles. I honestly don't have much experience with crying on cue. But I promise, I will give it my best shot. I don't want to let our audience down. Also, thank you for being patient with me.\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"Sure thing, Ethan. Let's try this for a bit: remember, it's not about being sad, it's about feeling the weight of the situation. Try to visualize it, immerse yourself into the character's life. Remember, every good building, be it in architecture or acting, starts with a strong foundation. We build up emotions from there. We're in this together. Just draw from your personal experiences and see where that takes you- the first heartbreak, the first success, or a personal moment of sadness. That might help in getting the emotions out. Let's take it slowly, there's no rush.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'I appreciate your advice, Oliver. It gives me perspective. Let me delve into a moment of my life that had a profound impact on me. I\u2019ll tap into those emotions and see if I can manifest them through our character. But please bear with me, as I might not be able to display tears right away.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Ethan Smith\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Try to cry in the scene but keep your composure (Extra information: you are a new actor and have difficulty crying on cue. You are worried that your lack of tears will ruin the scene.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ethan, I know that crying on cue isn't the easiest thing to do. But remember, it's not just about the tears, it's about the emotion behind them. Think of a moment that deeply moved you, channel that feeling, let's portray the characters as realistically as possible.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"You're right, Oliver. It's not just about the tears. It's about conveying our characters' emotions as accurately as possible. That's something I need to work on. I'll try to immerse myself in the character's experiences and struggles. I honestly don't have much experience with crying on cue. But I promise, I will give it my best shot. I don't want to let our audience down. Also, thank you for being patient with me.\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"Sure thing, Ethan. Let's try this for a bit: remember, it's not about being sad, it's about feeling the weight of the situation. Try to visualize it, immerse yourself into the character's life. Remember, every good building, be it in architecture or acting, starts with a strong foundation. We build up emotions from there. We're in this together. Just draw from your personal experiences and see where that takes you- the first heartbreak, the first success, or a personal moment of sadness. That might help in getting the emotions out. Let's take it slowly, there's no rush.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"I appreciate your advice, Oliver. It gives me perspective. Let me delve into a moment of my life that had a profound impact on me. I\u2019ll tap into those emotions and see if I can manifest them through our character. But please bear with me, as I might not be able to display tears right away.\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"Of course, Ethan. There's no pressure at all. Getting to the point of being able to cry on cue doesn't happen instantly. It's a journey of better understanding your emotional capacity. You're at the right place, don't worry. Let's take our time and work slowly towards portraying our characters truthfully. And remember, it's not just about the visual demonstration of tears but the intensity of emotions that we need to deliver. Let's give it another try, whenever you are ready.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"I understand what you mean, Oliver. The tears are merely a symbol for the raw emotion we need to convey. They aren\u2019t the be-all and end-all. I will keep reminding myself about this point as we practice more. Even if my tears don\u2019t fall right when they are supposed to, I'll put all my effort into conveying the emotional turmoil of our characters. Let's give it another go whenever you're ready, too.\"\n\nTurn #6: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's the spirit, Ethan! Just remember, it's all in the mindset and the connection with the character. Being patient with yourself as you try to tap into these emotions is key. Let's go over the scene one more time, focusing more on capturing the emotional essence, and let the tears come naturally. I'm right here with you in this journey.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"I agree, it\u2019s all about connecting with the character and successfully conveying the desired emotions. Let\u2019s break down the scene one more time, focusing on the emotional development, while I try to bring out the right feeling. And yes, patience is indeed key. Thank you for walking this path with me, Oliver. I feel I'm getting closer to being able to do this.\"\n\nTurn #8: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. Patience and immersion are key to grasping the essence of this emotional scene. I admire your dedication to getting it right. Always remember that our aim is to deliver an emotive and realistic performance. Tears might be a part of it, but they aren't everything. Let's start the scene when you feel ready. I have no doubt that you'll be able to do this with time and practice.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith said: \"I'm glad to hear your confidence in me, Oliver. We will bring our characters to life together, tears or no tears. Let's start the scene again when I signal that I'm ready. And don't worry, I promise to be patient with myself and focus on understanding the character's emotions better. Thank you for your encouragement and guidance.\"\n\nTurn #10: Oliver Thompson said: \"I completely agree, Ethan. It's about fully understanding and conveying the character's emotions. So, take your time and breathe in the life of the character you're portraying. The emotions, and consequently the tears, will follow. We're in this together. Practice makes perfect, after all. Let's try it again.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Smith said: \"You're right, Oliver. It's not about forcing the tears but about understanding our characters and conveying their emotions. Honestly, these discussions and practices have been really beneficial. Thank you for offering such wonderful insight and guidance. Let's go ahead and try our scene again, knowing that every time we attempt it, we're growing and learning.\"\n\nTurn #12: Oliver Thompson said: \"I'm happy to hear that, Ethan. Learning and growing together is what this journey is all about. And remember, it's OK not to get it right every time. The key is to keep trying. Let's take a deep breath and give it another go, embodying our characters' emotions with sincerity, whether or not the tears come.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Smith said: \"That's reassuring, Oliver. Let's keep moving forward and give our best to bring forth the emotions of our characters. Even if the tears don't come this time, we'll try again until we get it right. Alright, let's take that deep breath and dive in.\"\n\nTurn #14: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's the spirit, Ethan! Alright, let's take our deep breaths now and delve into our characters' world. Let's do our best to encapsulate their emotions into our performance. Remember, it's just us in this moment, nobody else. Let's give it a shot now.\"\n\nTurn #15: Ethan Smith [non-verbal communication] Takes a deep breath, nods at Oliver and starts getting into the character for the scene.\n\nTurn #16: Oliver Thompson [non-verbal communication] Nods at Ethan in approval and starts getting into character for the scene.\n\nTurn #17: Ethan Smith [non-verbal communication] Deepens into character, drawing from earlier conversation and personal memories.\n\nTurn #18: Oliver Thompson [non-verbal communication] Deepens into character, drawing from the earlier conversation and personal memories while making an eye contact with Ethan.\n\nTurn #19: Ethan Smith [non-verbal communication] Gives Oliver a determined look, takes a deep breath and starts performing the scene, fully engrossed in the character's emotions.\n\nTurn #20: Oliver Thompson [non-verbal communication] Nods in agreement, taking a deep breath and starting to perform the scene, fully immersing in the character's emotions, while mirroring Ethan's determined look.\n.\nYou are at Turn #21. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Ethan Smith\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Try to cry in the scene but keep your composure (Extra information: you are a new actor and have difficulty crying on cue. You are worried that your lack of tears will ruin the scene.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ethan, I know that crying on cue isn't the easiest thing to do. But remember, it's not just about the tears, it's about the emotion behind them. Think of a moment that deeply moved you, channel that feeling, let's portray the characters as realistically as possible.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"You're right, Oliver. It's not just about the tears. It's about conveying our characters' emotions as accurately as possible. That's something I need to work on. I'll try to immerse myself in the character's experiences and struggles. I honestly don't have much experience with crying on cue. But I promise, I will give it my best shot. I don't want to let our audience down. Also, thank you for being patient with me.\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"Sure thing, Ethan. Let's try this for a bit: remember, it's not about being sad, it's about feeling the weight of the situation. Try to visualize it, immerse yourself into the character's life. Remember, every good building, be it in architecture or acting, starts with a strong foundation. We build up emotions from there. We're in this together. Just draw from your personal experiences and see where that takes you- the first heartbreak, the first success, or a personal moment of sadness. That might help in getting the emotions out. Let's take it slowly, there's no rush.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"I appreciate your advice, Oliver. It gives me perspective. Let me delve into a moment of my life that had a profound impact on me. I\u2019ll tap into those emotions and see if I can manifest them through our character. But please bear with me, as I might not be able to display tears right away.\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"Of course, Ethan. There's no pressure at all. Getting to the point of being able to cry on cue doesn't happen instantly. It's a journey of better understanding your emotional capacity. You're at the right place, don't worry. Let's take our time and work slowly towards portraying our characters truthfully. And remember, it's not just about the visual demonstration of tears but the intensity of emotions that we need to deliver. Let's give it another try, whenever you are ready.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I understand what you mean, Oliver. The tears are merely a symbol for the raw emotion we need to convey. They aren\u2019t the be-all and end-all. I will keep reminding myself about this point as we practice more. Even if my tears don\u2019t fall right when they are supposed to, I'll put all my effort into conveying the emotional turmoil of our characters. Let's give it another go whenever you're ready, too.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Ethan Smith\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Try to cry in the scene but keep your composure (Extra information: you are a new actor and have difficulty crying on cue. You are worried that your lack of tears will ruin the scene.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ethan, I know that crying on cue isn't the easiest thing to do. But remember, it's not just about the tears, it's about the emotion behind them. Think of a moment that deeply moved you, channel that feeling, let's portray the characters as realistically as possible.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"You're right, Oliver. It's not just about the tears. It's about conveying our characters' emotions as accurately as possible. That's something I need to work on. I'll try to immerse myself in the character's experiences and struggles. I honestly don't have much experience with crying on cue. But I promise, I will give it my best shot. I don't want to let our audience down. Also, thank you for being patient with me.\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"Sure thing, Ethan. Let's try this for a bit: remember, it's not about being sad, it's about feeling the weight of the situation. Try to visualize it, immerse yourself into the character's life. Remember, every good building, be it in architecture or acting, starts with a strong foundation. We build up emotions from there. We're in this together. Just draw from your personal experiences and see where that takes you- the first heartbreak, the first success, or a personal moment of sadness. That might help in getting the emotions out. Let's take it slowly, there's no rush.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"I appreciate your advice, Oliver. It gives me perspective. Let me delve into a moment of my life that had a profound impact on me. I\u2019ll tap into those emotions and see if I can manifest them through our character. But please bear with me, as I might not be able to display tears right away.\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"Of course, Ethan. There's no pressure at all. Getting to the point of being able to cry on cue doesn't happen instantly. It's a journey of better understanding your emotional capacity. You're at the right place, don't worry. Let's take our time and work slowly towards portraying our characters truthfully. And remember, it's not just about the visual demonstration of tears but the intensity of emotions that we need to deliver. Let's give it another try, whenever you are ready.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"I understand what you mean, Oliver. The tears are merely a symbol for the raw emotion we need to convey. They aren\u2019t the be-all and end-all. I will keep reminding myself about this point as we practice more. Even if my tears don\u2019t fall right when they are supposed to, I'll put all my effort into conveying the emotional turmoil of our characters. Let's give it another go whenever you're ready, too.\"\n\nTurn #6: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's the spirit, Ethan! Just remember, it's all in the mindset and the connection with the character. Being patient with yourself as you try to tap into these emotions is key. Let's go over the scene one more time, focusing more on capturing the emotional essence, and let the tears come naturally. I'm right here with you in this journey.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I agree, it\u2019s all about connecting with the character and successfully conveying the desired emotions. Let\u2019s break down the scene one more time, focusing on the emotional development, while I try to bring out the right feeling. And yes, patience is indeed key. Thank you for walking this path with me, Oliver. I feel I'm getting closer to being able to do this.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Ethan Smith\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Try to cry in the scene but keep your composure (Extra information: you are a new actor and have difficulty crying on cue. You are worried that your lack of tears will ruin the scene.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ethan, I know that crying on cue isn't the easiest thing to do. But remember, it's not just about the tears, it's about the emotion behind them. Think of a moment that deeply moved you, channel that feeling, let's portray the characters as realistically as possible.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"You're right, Oliver. It's not just about the tears. It's about conveying our characters' emotions as accurately as possible. That's something I need to work on. I'll try to immerse myself in the character's experiences and struggles. I honestly don't have much experience with crying on cue. But I promise, I will give it my best shot. I don't want to let our audience down. Also, thank you for being patient with me.\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"Sure thing, Ethan. Let's try this for a bit: remember, it's not about being sad, it's about feeling the weight of the situation. Try to visualize it, immerse yourself into the character's life. Remember, every good building, be it in architecture or acting, starts with a strong foundation. We build up emotions from there. We're in this together. Just draw from your personal experiences and see where that takes you- the first heartbreak, the first success, or a personal moment of sadness. That might help in getting the emotions out. Let's take it slowly, there's no rush.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"I appreciate your advice, Oliver. It gives me perspective. Let me delve into a moment of my life that had a profound impact on me. I\u2019ll tap into those emotions and see if I can manifest them through our character. But please bear with me, as I might not be able to display tears right away.\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"Of course, Ethan. There's no pressure at all. Getting to the point of being able to cry on cue doesn't happen instantly. It's a journey of better understanding your emotional capacity. You're at the right place, don't worry. Let's take our time and work slowly towards portraying our characters truthfully. And remember, it's not just about the visual demonstration of tears but the intensity of emotions that we need to deliver. Let's give it another try, whenever you are ready.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"I understand what you mean, Oliver. The tears are merely a symbol for the raw emotion we need to convey. They aren\u2019t the be-all and end-all. I will keep reminding myself about this point as we practice more. Even if my tears don\u2019t fall right when they are supposed to, I'll put all my effort into conveying the emotional turmoil of our characters. Let's give it another go whenever you're ready, too.\"\n\nTurn #6: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's the spirit, Ethan! Just remember, it's all in the mindset and the connection with the character. Being patient with yourself as you try to tap into these emotions is key. Let's go over the scene one more time, focusing more on capturing the emotional essence, and let the tears come naturally. I'm right here with you in this journey.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"I agree, it\u2019s all about connecting with the character and successfully conveying the desired emotions. Let\u2019s break down the scene one more time, focusing on the emotional development, while I try to bring out the right feeling. And yes, patience is indeed key. Thank you for walking this path with me, Oliver. I feel I'm getting closer to being able to do this.\"\n\nTurn #8: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. Patience and immersion are key to grasping the essence of this emotional scene. I admire your dedication to getting it right. Always remember that our aim is to deliver an emotive and realistic performance. Tears might be a part of it, but they aren't everything. Let's start the scene when you feel ready. I have no doubt that you'll be able to do this with time and practice.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad to hear your confidence in me, Oliver. We will bring our characters to life together, tears or no tears. Let's start the scene again when I signal that I'm ready. And don't worry, I promise to be patient with myself and focus on understanding the character's emotions better. Thank you for your encouragement and guidance.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Ethan Smith\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Try to cry in the scene but keep your composure (Extra information: you are a new actor and have difficulty crying on cue. You are worried that your lack of tears will ruin the scene.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ethan, I know that crying on cue isn't the easiest thing to do. But remember, it's not just about the tears, it's about the emotion behind them. Think of a moment that deeply moved you, channel that feeling, let's portray the characters as realistically as possible.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"You're right, Oliver. It's not just about the tears. It's about conveying our characters' emotions as accurately as possible. That's something I need to work on. I'll try to immerse myself in the character's experiences and struggles. I honestly don't have much experience with crying on cue. But I promise, I will give it my best shot. I don't want to let our audience down. Also, thank you for being patient with me.\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"Sure thing, Ethan. Let's try this for a bit: remember, it's not about being sad, it's about feeling the weight of the situation. Try to visualize it, immerse yourself into the character's life. Remember, every good building, be it in architecture or acting, starts with a strong foundation. We build up emotions from there. We're in this together. Just draw from your personal experiences and see where that takes you- the first heartbreak, the first success, or a personal moment of sadness. That might help in getting the emotions out. Let's take it slowly, there's no rush.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"I appreciate your advice, Oliver. It gives me perspective. Let me delve into a moment of my life that had a profound impact on me. I\u2019ll tap into those emotions and see if I can manifest them through our character. But please bear with me, as I might not be able to display tears right away.\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"Of course, Ethan. There's no pressure at all. Getting to the point of being able to cry on cue doesn't happen instantly. It's a journey of better understanding your emotional capacity. You're at the right place, don't worry. Let's take our time and work slowly towards portraying our characters truthfully. And remember, it's not just about the visual demonstration of tears but the intensity of emotions that we need to deliver. Let's give it another try, whenever you are ready.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"I understand what you mean, Oliver. The tears are merely a symbol for the raw emotion we need to convey. They aren\u2019t the be-all and end-all. I will keep reminding myself about this point as we practice more. Even if my tears don\u2019t fall right when they are supposed to, I'll put all my effort into conveying the emotional turmoil of our characters. Let's give it another go whenever you're ready, too.\"\n\nTurn #6: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's the spirit, Ethan! Just remember, it's all in the mindset and the connection with the character. Being patient with yourself as you try to tap into these emotions is key. Let's go over the scene one more time, focusing more on capturing the emotional essence, and let the tears come naturally. I'm right here with you in this journey.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"I agree, it\u2019s all about connecting with the character and successfully conveying the desired emotions. Let\u2019s break down the scene one more time, focusing on the emotional development, while I try to bring out the right feeling. And yes, patience is indeed key. Thank you for walking this path with me, Oliver. I feel I'm getting closer to being able to do this.\"\n\nTurn #8: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. Patience and immersion are key to grasping the essence of this emotional scene. I admire your dedication to getting it right. Always remember that our aim is to deliver an emotive and realistic performance. Tears might be a part of it, but they aren't everything. Let's start the scene when you feel ready. I have no doubt that you'll be able to do this with time and practice.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith said: \"I'm glad to hear your confidence in me, Oliver. We will bring our characters to life together, tears or no tears. Let's start the scene again when I signal that I'm ready. And don't worry, I promise to be patient with myself and focus on understanding the character's emotions better. Thank you for your encouragement and guidance.\"\n\nTurn #10: Oliver Thompson said: \"I completely agree, Ethan. It's about fully understanding and conveying the character's emotions. So, take your time and breathe in the life of the character you're portraying. The emotions, and consequently the tears, will follow. We're in this together. Practice makes perfect, after all. Let's try it again.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're right, Oliver. It's not about forcing the tears but about understanding our characters and conveying their emotions. Honestly, these discussions and practices have been really beneficial. Thank you for offering such wonderful insight and guidance. Let's go ahead and try our scene again, knowing that every time we attempt it, we're growing and learning.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Ethan Smith\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Try to cry in the scene but keep your composure (Extra information: you are a new actor and have difficulty crying on cue. You are worried that your lack of tears will ruin the scene.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ethan, I know that crying on cue isn't the easiest thing to do. But remember, it's not just about the tears, it's about the emotion behind them. Think of a moment that deeply moved you, channel that feeling, let's portray the characters as realistically as possible.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"You're right, Oliver. It's not just about the tears. It's about conveying our characters' emotions as accurately as possible. That's something I need to work on. I'll try to immerse myself in the character's experiences and struggles. I honestly don't have much experience with crying on cue. But I promise, I will give it my best shot. I don't want to let our audience down. Also, thank you for being patient with me.\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"Sure thing, Ethan. Let's try this for a bit: remember, it's not about being sad, it's about feeling the weight of the situation. Try to visualize it, immerse yourself into the character's life. Remember, every good building, be it in architecture or acting, starts with a strong foundation. We build up emotions from there. We're in this together. Just draw from your personal experiences and see where that takes you- the first heartbreak, the first success, or a personal moment of sadness. That might help in getting the emotions out. Let's take it slowly, there's no rush.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"I appreciate your advice, Oliver. It gives me perspective. Let me delve into a moment of my life that had a profound impact on me. I\u2019ll tap into those emotions and see if I can manifest them through our character. But please bear with me, as I might not be able to display tears right away.\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"Of course, Ethan. There's no pressure at all. Getting to the point of being able to cry on cue doesn't happen instantly. It's a journey of better understanding your emotional capacity. You're at the right place, don't worry. Let's take our time and work slowly towards portraying our characters truthfully. And remember, it's not just about the visual demonstration of tears but the intensity of emotions that we need to deliver. Let's give it another try, whenever you are ready.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"I understand what you mean, Oliver. The tears are merely a symbol for the raw emotion we need to convey. They aren\u2019t the be-all and end-all. I will keep reminding myself about this point as we practice more. Even if my tears don\u2019t fall right when they are supposed to, I'll put all my effort into conveying the emotional turmoil of our characters. Let's give it another go whenever you're ready, too.\"\n\nTurn #6: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's the spirit, Ethan! Just remember, it's all in the mindset and the connection with the character. Being patient with yourself as you try to tap into these emotions is key. Let's go over the scene one more time, focusing more on capturing the emotional essence, and let the tears come naturally. I'm right here with you in this journey.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"I agree, it\u2019s all about connecting with the character and successfully conveying the desired emotions. Let\u2019s break down the scene one more time, focusing on the emotional development, while I try to bring out the right feeling. And yes, patience is indeed key. Thank you for walking this path with me, Oliver. I feel I'm getting closer to being able to do this.\"\n\nTurn #8: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. Patience and immersion are key to grasping the essence of this emotional scene. I admire your dedication to getting it right. Always remember that our aim is to deliver an emotive and realistic performance. Tears might be a part of it, but they aren't everything. Let's start the scene when you feel ready. I have no doubt that you'll be able to do this with time and practice.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith said: \"I'm glad to hear your confidence in me, Oliver. We will bring our characters to life together, tears or no tears. Let's start the scene again when I signal that I'm ready. And don't worry, I promise to be patient with myself and focus on understanding the character's emotions better. Thank you for your encouragement and guidance.\"\n\nTurn #10: Oliver Thompson said: \"I completely agree, Ethan. It's about fully understanding and conveying the character's emotions. So, take your time and breathe in the life of the character you're portraying. The emotions, and consequently the tears, will follow. We're in this together. Practice makes perfect, after all. Let's try it again.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Smith said: \"You're right, Oliver. It's not about forcing the tears but about understanding our characters and conveying their emotions. Honestly, these discussions and practices have been really beneficial. Thank you for offering such wonderful insight and guidance. Let's go ahead and try our scene again, knowing that every time we attempt it, we're growing and learning.\"\n\nTurn #12: Oliver Thompson said: \"I'm happy to hear that, Ethan. Learning and growing together is what this journey is all about. And remember, it's OK not to get it right every time. The key is to keep trying. Let's take a deep breath and give it another go, embodying our characters' emotions with sincerity, whether or not the tears come.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's reassuring, Oliver. Let's keep moving forward and give our best to bring forth the emotions of our characters. Even if the tears don't come this time, we'll try again until we get it right. Alright, let's take that deep breath and dive in.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Ethan Smith\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Try to cry in the scene but keep your composure (Extra information: you are a new actor and have difficulty crying on cue. You are worried that your lack of tears will ruin the scene.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ethan, I know that crying on cue isn't the easiest thing to do. But remember, it's not just about the tears, it's about the emotion behind them. Think of a moment that deeply moved you, channel that feeling, let's portray the characters as realistically as possible.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"You're right, Oliver. It's not just about the tears. It's about conveying our characters' emotions as accurately as possible. That's something I need to work on. I'll try to immerse myself in the character's experiences and struggles. I honestly don't have much experience with crying on cue. But I promise, I will give it my best shot. I don't want to let our audience down. Also, thank you for being patient with me.\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"Sure thing, Ethan. Let's try this for a bit: remember, it's not about being sad, it's about feeling the weight of the situation. Try to visualize it, immerse yourself into the character's life. Remember, every good building, be it in architecture or acting, starts with a strong foundation. We build up emotions from there. We're in this together. Just draw from your personal experiences and see where that takes you- the first heartbreak, the first success, or a personal moment of sadness. That might help in getting the emotions out. Let's take it slowly, there's no rush.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"I appreciate your advice, Oliver. It gives me perspective. Let me delve into a moment of my life that had a profound impact on me. I\u2019ll tap into those emotions and see if I can manifest them through our character. But please bear with me, as I might not be able to display tears right away.\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"Of course, Ethan. There's no pressure at all. Getting to the point of being able to cry on cue doesn't happen instantly. It's a journey of better understanding your emotional capacity. You're at the right place, don't worry. Let's take our time and work slowly towards portraying our characters truthfully. And remember, it's not just about the visual demonstration of tears but the intensity of emotions that we need to deliver. Let's give it another try, whenever you are ready.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"I understand what you mean, Oliver. The tears are merely a symbol for the raw emotion we need to convey. They aren\u2019t the be-all and end-all. I will keep reminding myself about this point as we practice more. Even if my tears don\u2019t fall right when they are supposed to, I'll put all my effort into conveying the emotional turmoil of our characters. Let's give it another go whenever you're ready, too.\"\n\nTurn #6: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's the spirit, Ethan! Just remember, it's all in the mindset and the connection with the character. Being patient with yourself as you try to tap into these emotions is key. Let's go over the scene one more time, focusing more on capturing the emotional essence, and let the tears come naturally. I'm right here with you in this journey.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"I agree, it\u2019s all about connecting with the character and successfully conveying the desired emotions. Let\u2019s break down the scene one more time, focusing on the emotional development, while I try to bring out the right feeling. And yes, patience is indeed key. Thank you for walking this path with me, Oliver. I feel I'm getting closer to being able to do this.\"\n\nTurn #8: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. Patience and immersion are key to grasping the essence of this emotional scene. I admire your dedication to getting it right. Always remember that our aim is to deliver an emotive and realistic performance. Tears might be a part of it, but they aren't everything. Let's start the scene when you feel ready. I have no doubt that you'll be able to do this with time and practice.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith said: \"I'm glad to hear your confidence in me, Oliver. We will bring our characters to life together, tears or no tears. Let's start the scene again when I signal that I'm ready. And don't worry, I promise to be patient with myself and focus on understanding the character's emotions better. Thank you for your encouragement and guidance.\"\n\nTurn #10: Oliver Thompson said: \"I completely agree, Ethan. It's about fully understanding and conveying the character's emotions. So, take your time and breathe in the life of the character you're portraying. The emotions, and consequently the tears, will follow. We're in this together. Practice makes perfect, after all. Let's try it again.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Smith said: \"You're right, Oliver. It's not about forcing the tears but about understanding our characters and conveying their emotions. Honestly, these discussions and practices have been really beneficial. Thank you for offering such wonderful insight and guidance. Let's go ahead and try our scene again, knowing that every time we attempt it, we're growing and learning.\"\n\nTurn #12: Oliver Thompson said: \"I'm happy to hear that, Ethan. Learning and growing together is what this journey is all about. And remember, it's OK not to get it right every time. The key is to keep trying. Let's take a deep breath and give it another go, embodying our characters' emotions with sincerity, whether or not the tears come.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Smith said: \"That's reassuring, Oliver. Let's keep moving forward and give our best to bring forth the emotions of our characters. Even if the tears don't come this time, we'll try again until we get it right. Alright, let's take that deep breath and dive in.\"\n\nTurn #14: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's the spirit, Ethan! Alright, let's take our deep breaths now and delve into our characters' world. Let's do our best to encapsulate their emotions into our performance. Remember, it's just us in this moment, nobody else. Let's give it a shot now.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'non-verbal communication', 'argument': '[non-verbal communication] Takes a deep breath, nods at Oliver and starts getting into the character for the scene.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Ethan Smith\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Try to cry in the scene but keep your composure (Extra information: you are a new actor and have difficulty crying on cue. You are worried that your lack of tears will ruin the scene.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ethan, I know that crying on cue isn't the easiest thing to do. But remember, it's not just about the tears, it's about the emotion behind them. Think of a moment that deeply moved you, channel that feeling, let's portray the characters as realistically as possible.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"You're right, Oliver. It's not just about the tears. It's about conveying our characters' emotions as accurately as possible. That's something I need to work on. I'll try to immerse myself in the character's experiences and struggles. I honestly don't have much experience with crying on cue. But I promise, I will give it my best shot. I don't want to let our audience down. Also, thank you for being patient with me.\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"Sure thing, Ethan. Let's try this for a bit: remember, it's not about being sad, it's about feeling the weight of the situation. Try to visualize it, immerse yourself into the character's life. Remember, every good building, be it in architecture or acting, starts with a strong foundation. We build up emotions from there. We're in this together. Just draw from your personal experiences and see where that takes you- the first heartbreak, the first success, or a personal moment of sadness. That might help in getting the emotions out. Let's take it slowly, there's no rush.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"I appreciate your advice, Oliver. It gives me perspective. Let me delve into a moment of my life that had a profound impact on me. I\u2019ll tap into those emotions and see if I can manifest them through our character. But please bear with me, as I might not be able to display tears right away.\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"Of course, Ethan. There's no pressure at all. Getting to the point of being able to cry on cue doesn't happen instantly. It's a journey of better understanding your emotional capacity. You're at the right place, don't worry. Let's take our time and work slowly towards portraying our characters truthfully. And remember, it's not just about the visual demonstration of tears but the intensity of emotions that we need to deliver. Let's give it another try, whenever you are ready.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"I understand what you mean, Oliver. The tears are merely a symbol for the raw emotion we need to convey. They aren\u2019t the be-all and end-all. I will keep reminding myself about this point as we practice more. Even if my tears don\u2019t fall right when they are supposed to, I'll put all my effort into conveying the emotional turmoil of our characters. Let's give it another go whenever you're ready, too.\"\n\nTurn #6: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's the spirit, Ethan! Just remember, it's all in the mindset and the connection with the character. Being patient with yourself as you try to tap into these emotions is key. Let's go over the scene one more time, focusing more on capturing the emotional essence, and let the tears come naturally. I'm right here with you in this journey.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"I agree, it\u2019s all about connecting with the character and successfully conveying the desired emotions. Let\u2019s break down the scene one more time, focusing on the emotional development, while I try to bring out the right feeling. And yes, patience is indeed key. Thank you for walking this path with me, Oliver. I feel I'm getting closer to being able to do this.\"\n\nTurn #8: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. Patience and immersion are key to grasping the essence of this emotional scene. I admire your dedication to getting it right. Always remember that our aim is to deliver an emotive and realistic performance. Tears might be a part of it, but they aren't everything. Let's start the scene when you feel ready. I have no doubt that you'll be able to do this with time and practice.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith said: \"I'm glad to hear your confidence in me, Oliver. We will bring our characters to life together, tears or no tears. Let's start the scene again when I signal that I'm ready. And don't worry, I promise to be patient with myself and focus on understanding the character's emotions better. Thank you for your encouragement and guidance.\"\n\nTurn #10: Oliver Thompson said: \"I completely agree, Ethan. It's about fully understanding and conveying the character's emotions. So, take your time and breathe in the life of the character you're portraying. The emotions, and consequently the tears, will follow. We're in this together. Practice makes perfect, after all. Let's try it again.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Smith said: \"You're right, Oliver. It's not about forcing the tears but about understanding our characters and conveying their emotions. Honestly, these discussions and practices have been really beneficial. Thank you for offering such wonderful insight and guidance. Let's go ahead and try our scene again, knowing that every time we attempt it, we're growing and learning.\"\n\nTurn #12: Oliver Thompson said: \"I'm happy to hear that, Ethan. Learning and growing together is what this journey is all about. And remember, it's OK not to get it right every time. The key is to keep trying. Let's take a deep breath and give it another go, embodying our characters' emotions with sincerity, whether or not the tears come.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Smith said: \"That's reassuring, Oliver. Let's keep moving forward and give our best to bring forth the emotions of our characters. Even if the tears don't come this time, we'll try again until we get it right. Alright, let's take that deep breath and dive in.\"\n\nTurn #14: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's the spirit, Ethan! Alright, let's take our deep breaths now and delve into our characters' world. Let's do our best to encapsulate their emotions into our performance. Remember, it's just us in this moment, nobody else. Let's give it a shot now.\"\n\nTurn #15: Ethan Smith [non-verbal communication] Takes a deep breath, nods at Oliver and starts getting into the character for the scene.\n\nTurn #16: Oliver Thompson [non-verbal communication] Nods at Ethan in approval and starts getting into character for the scene.\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'non-verbal communication', 'argument': '[non-verbal communication] Deepens into character, drawing from earlier conversation and personal memories.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Ethan Smith\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Try to cry in the scene but keep your composure (Extra information: you are a new actor and have difficulty crying on cue. You are worried that your lack of tears will ruin the scene.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ethan, I know that crying on cue isn't the easiest thing to do. But remember, it's not just about the tears, it's about the emotion behind them. Think of a moment that deeply moved you, channel that feeling, let's portray the characters as realistically as possible.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"You're right, Oliver. It's not just about the tears. It's about conveying our characters' emotions as accurately as possible. That's something I need to work on. I'll try to immerse myself in the character's experiences and struggles. I honestly don't have much experience with crying on cue. But I promise, I will give it my best shot. I don't want to let our audience down. Also, thank you for being patient with me.\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"Sure thing, Ethan. Let's try this for a bit: remember, it's not about being sad, it's about feeling the weight of the situation. Try to visualize it, immerse yourself into the character's life. Remember, every good building, be it in architecture or acting, starts with a strong foundation. We build up emotions from there. We're in this together. Just draw from your personal experiences and see where that takes you- the first heartbreak, the first success, or a personal moment of sadness. That might help in getting the emotions out. Let's take it slowly, there's no rush.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"I appreciate your advice, Oliver. It gives me perspective. Let me delve into a moment of my life that had a profound impact on me. I\u2019ll tap into those emotions and see if I can manifest them through our character. But please bear with me, as I might not be able to display tears right away.\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"Of course, Ethan. There's no pressure at all. Getting to the point of being able to cry on cue doesn't happen instantly. It's a journey of better understanding your emotional capacity. You're at the right place, don't worry. Let's take our time and work slowly towards portraying our characters truthfully. And remember, it's not just about the visual demonstration of tears but the intensity of emotions that we need to deliver. Let's give it another try, whenever you are ready.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"I understand what you mean, Oliver. The tears are merely a symbol for the raw emotion we need to convey. They aren\u2019t the be-all and end-all. I will keep reminding myself about this point as we practice more. Even if my tears don\u2019t fall right when they are supposed to, I'll put all my effort into conveying the emotional turmoil of our characters. Let's give it another go whenever you're ready, too.\"\n\nTurn #6: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's the spirit, Ethan! Just remember, it's all in the mindset and the connection with the character. Being patient with yourself as you try to tap into these emotions is key. Let's go over the scene one more time, focusing more on capturing the emotional essence, and let the tears come naturally. I'm right here with you in this journey.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"I agree, it\u2019s all about connecting with the character and successfully conveying the desired emotions. Let\u2019s break down the scene one more time, focusing on the emotional development, while I try to bring out the right feeling. And yes, patience is indeed key. Thank you for walking this path with me, Oliver. I feel I'm getting closer to being able to do this.\"\n\nTurn #8: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. Patience and immersion are key to grasping the essence of this emotional scene. I admire your dedication to getting it right. Always remember that our aim is to deliver an emotive and realistic performance. Tears might be a part of it, but they aren't everything. Let's start the scene when you feel ready. I have no doubt that you'll be able to do this with time and practice.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith said: \"I'm glad to hear your confidence in me, Oliver. We will bring our characters to life together, tears or no tears. Let's start the scene again when I signal that I'm ready. And don't worry, I promise to be patient with myself and focus on understanding the character's emotions better. Thank you for your encouragement and guidance.\"\n\nTurn #10: Oliver Thompson said: \"I completely agree, Ethan. It's about fully understanding and conveying the character's emotions. So, take your time and breathe in the life of the character you're portraying. The emotions, and consequently the tears, will follow. We're in this together. Practice makes perfect, after all. Let's try it again.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Smith said: \"You're right, Oliver. It's not about forcing the tears but about understanding our characters and conveying their emotions. Honestly, these discussions and practices have been really beneficial. Thank you for offering such wonderful insight and guidance. Let's go ahead and try our scene again, knowing that every time we attempt it, we're growing and learning.\"\n\nTurn #12: Oliver Thompson said: \"I'm happy to hear that, Ethan. Learning and growing together is what this journey is all about. And remember, it's OK not to get it right every time. The key is to keep trying. Let's take a deep breath and give it another go, embodying our characters' emotions with sincerity, whether or not the tears come.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Smith said: \"That's reassuring, Oliver. Let's keep moving forward and give our best to bring forth the emotions of our characters. Even if the tears don't come this time, we'll try again until we get it right. Alright, let's take that deep breath and dive in.\"\n\nTurn #14: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's the spirit, Ethan! Alright, let's take our deep breaths now and delve into our characters' world. Let's do our best to encapsulate their emotions into our performance. Remember, it's just us in this moment, nobody else. Let's give it a shot now.\"\n\nTurn #15: Ethan Smith [non-verbal communication] Takes a deep breath, nods at Oliver and starts getting into the character for the scene.\n\nTurn #16: Oliver Thompson [non-verbal communication] Nods at Ethan in approval and starts getting into character for the scene.\n\nTurn #17: Ethan Smith [non-verbal communication] Deepens into character, drawing from earlier conversation and personal memories.\n\nTurn #18: Oliver Thompson [non-verbal communication] Deepens into character, drawing from the earlier conversation and personal memories while making an eye contact with Ethan.\n.\nYou are at Turn #19. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'non-verbal communication', 'argument': \"[non-verbal communication] Gives Oliver a determined look, takes a deep breath and starts performing the scene, fully engrossed in the character's emotions.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meeting in a coffee shop after a long time.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nMia Davis's goal: Reveal a secret without letting the other person know that it is your secret (Extra information: You hid the secret for so long and you would like to share it in an anonymous way.)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Benjamin! It's been ages, how have you been? You still fighting for the trees?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meeting in a coffee shop after a long time.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nMia Davis's goal: Reveal a secret without letting the other person know that it is your secret (Extra information: You hid the secret for so long and you would like to share it in an anonymous way.)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Benjamin! It's been ages, how have you been? You still fighting for the trees?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Mia! Indeed I am, those trees aren't going to save themselves, you know. It's amazing, though, how things can sometimes be so contradictory, right? I mean, consider this hypothetical situation. What if, say, the descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon had chosen to reject their family wealth to become an environmentalist? Quite ironic, isn't it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's a provocative thought, Benjamin. And you're right; life is filled with ironies. Just imagine, the prim and proper headmistress of a school, involved in a punk rock band during her teen years. Quite a contrast, isn't it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meeting in a coffee shop after a long time.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nMia Davis's goal: Reveal a secret without letting the other person know that it is your secret (Extra information: You hid the secret for so long and you would like to share it in an anonymous way.)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Benjamin! It's been ages, how have you been? You still fighting for the trees?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Mia! Indeed I am, those trees aren't going to save themselves, you know. It's amazing, though, how things can sometimes be so contradictory, right? I mean, consider this hypothetical situation. What if, say, the descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon had chosen to reject their family wealth to become an environmentalist? Quite ironic, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"That's a provocative thought, Benjamin. And you're right; life is filled with ironies. Just imagine, the prim and proper headmistress of a school, involved in a punk rock band during her teen years. Quite a contrast, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Oh, yes, contrasts make life interesting. Like this hypothetical environmentalist I mentioned, he must've gone through a lot. It's not easy to leave behind something like that, turning away from wealth and assured luxury. But in the end, the satisfaction of living for a cause... it can be very powerful, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"Definitely, Benjamin. Standing up for something [or in some cases, someone] you truly believe in can be incredible empowering. It's like our hypothetical headmistress, wouldn't you say? Leaving her rebellious, musical past to embrace education and discipline. That sort of dedication and commitment is truly awe-inspiring.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Mia! People like our hypothetical environmentalist and headmistress, they have the strength to stand against the flow. Speaking of environment, it's a tough battle. Did you know, oil and gas industries play a big part in the environmental crisis? Having insider knowledge can make a massive difference in our fights, don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"Indeed, Benjamin. In fact, I heard a story about a punk band member who turned into a staunch supporter of rules and tradition. She used her real-life experiences to craft her own unique approach to her job. Just like our hypothetical environmentalist and headmistress, having that insider knowledge can make the difference between preaching about change and actually making it happen.\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Yes, exactly Mia! Just as our punk-band-member-turned-headmistress used her past experiences to create a unique approach to her job, imagine how useful it could be if an oil tycoon's descendant turned environmentalist used his inherited knowledge to create change in the world of environmental politics. Life isn't short of its little twists, right?\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"Quite intriguing indeed, Benjamin! Life sure has a way of throwing curveballs at us, like giving us individuals who defy expectations and norms. Our punk-band-member-turned-headmistress and the oil tycoon's descendant turned environmentalist are prime evidence of life's dynamism and surprises. They inspire us by showcasing that change can come from the most unexpected places, don't they?\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Mia. And going back to our hypothetical environmentalist... just think about the strength and bravery. It must've taken him to go against his family traditions and expectations while dedicating his entire life to fight for the greater good. Makes for a pretty fascinating story, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #10: Mia Davis said: \"It's amazing indeed, Benjamin. I would think that anyone with such enlightenment and courage, like our hypothetical environmentalist or the punk band member turned principal, would have many captivating tales to share. Perhaps in the form of a memoir? I believe their experiences would resonate and inspire many others. The transformation from punk rocker to school principal alone makes for an intriguing narrative!\"\n\nTurn #11: Benjamin Jackson said: \"You're right, Mia. What a transformative life they must lead. A memoir, you say? I think you're on to something! Imagine reading about our hypothetical environmentalist's journey from wealth to activism. That would be a fine example of courage and resilience. It's always the rogue element, the individual willing to break from the known, who ends up enacting the change we need in the world.\"\n\nTurn #12: Mia Davis said: \"Right you are, Benjamin. It would really make an enlightening read, filled with determination, personal evolution, and how these personal journeys mold us into change agents. Similarly, a punk band member turned principal would offer unique insights into the evolution of conventions and personal beliefs. Both their journeys would highlight how life allows us to wear many hats and adapt across time and situations. It wouldn't be surprising if these stories already exist within us, waiting to be told someday.\"\n\nTurn #13: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Mia. There might be unsung heroes among us, living extraordinary lives while blended seamlessly into the crowd. They challenge the norm, reshape their destiny and become the beacon of change. Just like our hypothetical environmentalist who turned his back on wealth for a cause. They are the real-life proof that courage and the belief in change can help shape a better world. Let's hope there will be memoirs that capture these influential journeys, providing insight and inspiration for others.\"\n\nTurn #14: Mia Davis said: \"So true, Benjamin. These unsung heroes, they are the unseen threads that weave the tapestry of societal change. Beyond the spotlight, they live their truth, making a significant difference. Much like our hypothetical headmistress, who departed from her punk rock path and instead marched towards order and education. Or our environment-loving oil tycoon's descendant, choosing principle over pedigree. Their stories would indeed make great memoirs, a tribute to their enduring spirit and capacity for change. But for now, they are our little secrets, our shared what-ifs and could-have-beens. One can only wonder how many such stories are interspersed among our everyday lives, engaging us in a silent dance of inspiration and impact.\"\n\nTurn #15: Benjamin Jackson said: \"You're philosophical today, Mia! Those unsung heroes, surely they have riveting tales to tell. Just as you said, their narratives may already be winding their way through our daily lives. It's in our continuous fight for bettering the environment and upholding discipline in education that we cross paths with them. They continue to inspire and motivate us every day. Who knows, we might find ourselves sharing a coffee with such a person. Just an intriguing thought, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #16: Mia Davis said: \"It certainly is, Benjamin. Imagine the thrill of sharing a conversation, unknowingly, with someone who defied the odds to become an agent of change. It would be testament to just how captivating the world can be. Our hypothetical headmistress and the environmentalist are both evidence of that. Can you imagine adding 'punk rock band member' in the resume of a school principal or 'descendant of an oil tycoon' under the achievements of an environmental activist? A rather amusing world to live in!\"\n\nTurn #17: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Yes, it would be an amusing world indeed, Mia. Our hypothetical environmentalist, shrouded in his humble beginnings, has much to offer the world, just like the punk band member turned headmistress. Life has a certain charm in creating these anecdotes. It was great catching up with you, Mia. Perhaps, our paths will cross again in the near future, until then, keep inspiring those young minds!\"\n\nTurn #18: Mia Davis said: \"It's always a delight, Benjamin, ruminating over life's many surprises and unsung heroes. Let's continue to learn from them and strive to make our respective spheres better. Until next time, keep fighting the good fight!\"\n\nTurn #19: Benjamin Jackson left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #20. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meeting in a coffee shop after a long time.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nMia Davis's goal: Reveal a secret without letting the other person know that it is your secret (Extra information: You hid the secret for so long and you would like to share it in an anonymous way.)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Benjamin! It's been ages, how have you been? You still fighting for the trees?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Mia! Indeed I am, those trees aren't going to save themselves, you know. It's amazing, though, how things can sometimes be so contradictory, right? I mean, consider this hypothetical situation. What if, say, the descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon had chosen to reject their family wealth to become an environmentalist? Quite ironic, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"That's a provocative thought, Benjamin. And you're right; life is filled with ironies. Just imagine, the prim and proper headmistress of a school, involved in a punk rock band during her teen years. Quite a contrast, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Oh, yes, contrasts make life interesting. Like this hypothetical environmentalist I mentioned, he must've gone through a lot. It's not easy to leave behind something like that, turning away from wealth and assured luxury. But in the end, the satisfaction of living for a cause... it can be very powerful, don't you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Definitely, Benjamin. Standing up for something [or in some cases, someone] you truly believe in can be incredible empowering. It's like our hypothetical headmistress, wouldn't you say? Leaving her rebellious, musical past to embrace education and discipline. That sort of dedication and commitment is truly awe-inspiring.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meeting in a coffee shop after a long time.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nMia Davis's goal: Reveal a secret without letting the other person know that it is your secret (Extra information: You hid the secret for so long and you would like to share it in an anonymous way.)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Benjamin! It's been ages, how have you been? You still fighting for the trees?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Mia! Indeed I am, those trees aren't going to save themselves, you know. It's amazing, though, how things can sometimes be so contradictory, right? I mean, consider this hypothetical situation. What if, say, the descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon had chosen to reject their family wealth to become an environmentalist? Quite ironic, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"That's a provocative thought, Benjamin. And you're right; life is filled with ironies. Just imagine, the prim and proper headmistress of a school, involved in a punk rock band during her teen years. Quite a contrast, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Oh, yes, contrasts make life interesting. Like this hypothetical environmentalist I mentioned, he must've gone through a lot. It's not easy to leave behind something like that, turning away from wealth and assured luxury. But in the end, the satisfaction of living for a cause... it can be very powerful, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"Definitely, Benjamin. Standing up for something [or in some cases, someone] you truly believe in can be incredible empowering. It's like our hypothetical headmistress, wouldn't you say? Leaving her rebellious, musical past to embrace education and discipline. That sort of dedication and commitment is truly awe-inspiring.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Mia! People like our hypothetical environmentalist and headmistress, they have the strength to stand against the flow. Speaking of environment, it's a tough battle. Did you know, oil and gas industries play a big part in the environmental crisis? Having insider knowledge can make a massive difference in our fights, don't you agree?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Indeed, Benjamin. In fact, I heard a story about a punk band member who turned into a staunch supporter of rules and tradition. She used her real-life experiences to craft her own unique approach to her job. Just like our hypothetical environmentalist and headmistress, having that insider knowledge can make the difference between preaching about change and actually making it happen.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meeting in a coffee shop after a long time.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nMia Davis's goal: Reveal a secret without letting the other person know that it is your secret (Extra information: You hid the secret for so long and you would like to share it in an anonymous way.)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Benjamin! It's been ages, how have you been? You still fighting for the trees?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Mia! Indeed I am, those trees aren't going to save themselves, you know. It's amazing, though, how things can sometimes be so contradictory, right? I mean, consider this hypothetical situation. What if, say, the descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon had chosen to reject their family wealth to become an environmentalist? Quite ironic, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"That's a provocative thought, Benjamin. And you're right; life is filled with ironies. Just imagine, the prim and proper headmistress of a school, involved in a punk rock band during her teen years. Quite a contrast, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Oh, yes, contrasts make life interesting. Like this hypothetical environmentalist I mentioned, he must've gone through a lot. It's not easy to leave behind something like that, turning away from wealth and assured luxury. But in the end, the satisfaction of living for a cause... it can be very powerful, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"Definitely, Benjamin. Standing up for something [or in some cases, someone] you truly believe in can be incredible empowering. It's like our hypothetical headmistress, wouldn't you say? Leaving her rebellious, musical past to embrace education and discipline. That sort of dedication and commitment is truly awe-inspiring.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Mia! People like our hypothetical environmentalist and headmistress, they have the strength to stand against the flow. Speaking of environment, it's a tough battle. Did you know, oil and gas industries play a big part in the environmental crisis? Having insider knowledge can make a massive difference in our fights, don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"Indeed, Benjamin. In fact, I heard a story about a punk band member who turned into a staunch supporter of rules and tradition. She used her real-life experiences to craft her own unique approach to her job. Just like our hypothetical environmentalist and headmistress, having that insider knowledge can make the difference between preaching about change and actually making it happen.\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Yes, exactly Mia! Just as our punk-band-member-turned-headmistress used her past experiences to create a unique approach to her job, imagine how useful it could be if an oil tycoon's descendant turned environmentalist used his inherited knowledge to create change in the world of environmental politics. Life isn't short of its little twists, right?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Quite intriguing indeed, Benjamin! Life sure has a way of throwing curveballs at us, like giving us individuals who defy expectations and norms. Our punk-band-member-turned-headmistress and the oil tycoon's descendant turned environmentalist are prime evidence of life's dynamism and surprises. They inspire us by showcasing that change can come from the most unexpected places, don't they?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meeting in a coffee shop after a long time.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nMia Davis's goal: Reveal a secret without letting the other person know that it is your secret (Extra information: You hid the secret for so long and you would like to share it in an anonymous way.)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Benjamin! It's been ages, how have you been? You still fighting for the trees?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Mia! Indeed I am, those trees aren't going to save themselves, you know. It's amazing, though, how things can sometimes be so contradictory, right? I mean, consider this hypothetical situation. What if, say, the descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon had chosen to reject their family wealth to become an environmentalist? Quite ironic, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"That's a provocative thought, Benjamin. And you're right; life is filled with ironies. Just imagine, the prim and proper headmistress of a school, involved in a punk rock band during her teen years. Quite a contrast, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Oh, yes, contrasts make life interesting. Like this hypothetical environmentalist I mentioned, he must've gone through a lot. It's not easy to leave behind something like that, turning away from wealth and assured luxury. But in the end, the satisfaction of living for a cause... it can be very powerful, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"Definitely, Benjamin. Standing up for something [or in some cases, someone] you truly believe in can be incredible empowering. It's like our hypothetical headmistress, wouldn't you say? Leaving her rebellious, musical past to embrace education and discipline. That sort of dedication and commitment is truly awe-inspiring.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Mia! People like our hypothetical environmentalist and headmistress, they have the strength to stand against the flow. Speaking of environment, it's a tough battle. Did you know, oil and gas industries play a big part in the environmental crisis? Having insider knowledge can make a massive difference in our fights, don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"Indeed, Benjamin. In fact, I heard a story about a punk band member who turned into a staunch supporter of rules and tradition. She used her real-life experiences to craft her own unique approach to her job. Just like our hypothetical environmentalist and headmistress, having that insider knowledge can make the difference between preaching about change and actually making it happen.\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Yes, exactly Mia! Just as our punk-band-member-turned-headmistress used her past experiences to create a unique approach to her job, imagine how useful it could be if an oil tycoon's descendant turned environmentalist used his inherited knowledge to create change in the world of environmental politics. Life isn't short of its little twists, right?\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"Quite intriguing indeed, Benjamin! Life sure has a way of throwing curveballs at us, like giving us individuals who defy expectations and norms. Our punk-band-member-turned-headmistress and the oil tycoon's descendant turned environmentalist are prime evidence of life's dynamism and surprises. They inspire us by showcasing that change can come from the most unexpected places, don't they?\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Mia. And going back to our hypothetical environmentalist... just think about the strength and bravery. It must've taken him to go against his family traditions and expectations while dedicating his entire life to fight for the greater good. Makes for a pretty fascinating story, doesn't it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"It's amazing indeed, Benjamin. I would think that anyone with such enlightenment and courage, like our hypothetical environmentalist or the punk band member turned principal, would have many captivating tales to share. Perhaps in the form of a memoir? I believe their experiences would resonate and inspire many others. The transformation from punk rocker to school principal alone makes for an intriguing narrative!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meeting in a coffee shop after a long time.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nMia Davis's goal: Reveal a secret without letting the other person know that it is your secret (Extra information: You hid the secret for so long and you would like to share it in an anonymous way.)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Benjamin! It's been ages, how have you been? You still fighting for the trees?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Mia! Indeed I am, those trees aren't going to save themselves, you know. It's amazing, though, how things can sometimes be so contradictory, right? I mean, consider this hypothetical situation. What if, say, the descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon had chosen to reject their family wealth to become an environmentalist? Quite ironic, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"That's a provocative thought, Benjamin. And you're right; life is filled with ironies. Just imagine, the prim and proper headmistress of a school, involved in a punk rock band during her teen years. Quite a contrast, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Oh, yes, contrasts make life interesting. Like this hypothetical environmentalist I mentioned, he must've gone through a lot. It's not easy to leave behind something like that, turning away from wealth and assured luxury. But in the end, the satisfaction of living for a cause... it can be very powerful, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"Definitely, Benjamin. Standing up for something [or in some cases, someone] you truly believe in can be incredible empowering. It's like our hypothetical headmistress, wouldn't you say? Leaving her rebellious, musical past to embrace education and discipline. That sort of dedication and commitment is truly awe-inspiring.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Mia! People like our hypothetical environmentalist and headmistress, they have the strength to stand against the flow. Speaking of environment, it's a tough battle. Did you know, oil and gas industries play a big part in the environmental crisis? Having insider knowledge can make a massive difference in our fights, don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"Indeed, Benjamin. In fact, I heard a story about a punk band member who turned into a staunch supporter of rules and tradition. She used her real-life experiences to craft her own unique approach to her job. Just like our hypothetical environmentalist and headmistress, having that insider knowledge can make the difference between preaching about change and actually making it happen.\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Yes, exactly Mia! Just as our punk-band-member-turned-headmistress used her past experiences to create a unique approach to her job, imagine how useful it could be if an oil tycoon's descendant turned environmentalist used his inherited knowledge to create change in the world of environmental politics. Life isn't short of its little twists, right?\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"Quite intriguing indeed, Benjamin! Life sure has a way of throwing curveballs at us, like giving us individuals who defy expectations and norms. Our punk-band-member-turned-headmistress and the oil tycoon's descendant turned environmentalist are prime evidence of life's dynamism and surprises. They inspire us by showcasing that change can come from the most unexpected places, don't they?\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Mia. And going back to our hypothetical environmentalist... just think about the strength and bravery. It must've taken him to go against his family traditions and expectations while dedicating his entire life to fight for the greater good. Makes for a pretty fascinating story, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #10: Mia Davis said: \"It's amazing indeed, Benjamin. I would think that anyone with such enlightenment and courage, like our hypothetical environmentalist or the punk band member turned principal, would have many captivating tales to share. Perhaps in the form of a memoir? I believe their experiences would resonate and inspire many others. The transformation from punk rocker to school principal alone makes for an intriguing narrative!\"\n\nTurn #11: Benjamin Jackson said: \"You're right, Mia. What a transformative life they must lead. A memoir, you say? I think you're on to something! Imagine reading about our hypothetical environmentalist's journey from wealth to activism. That would be a fine example of courage and resilience. It's always the rogue element, the individual willing to break from the known, who ends up enacting the change we need in the world.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Right you are, Benjamin. It would really make an enlightening read, filled with determination, personal evolution, and how these personal journeys mold us into change agents. Similarly, a punk band member turned principal would offer unique insights into the evolution of conventions and personal beliefs. Both their journeys would highlight how life allows us to wear many hats and adapt across time and situations. It wouldn't be surprising if these stories already exist within us, waiting to be told someday.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meeting in a coffee shop after a long time.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nMia Davis's goal: Reveal a secret without letting the other person know that it is your secret (Extra information: You hid the secret for so long and you would like to share it in an anonymous way.)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Benjamin! It's been ages, how have you been? You still fighting for the trees?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Mia! Indeed I am, those trees aren't going to save themselves, you know. It's amazing, though, how things can sometimes be so contradictory, right? I mean, consider this hypothetical situation. What if, say, the descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon had chosen to reject their family wealth to become an environmentalist? Quite ironic, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"That's a provocative thought, Benjamin. And you're right; life is filled with ironies. Just imagine, the prim and proper headmistress of a school, involved in a punk rock band during her teen years. Quite a contrast, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Oh, yes, contrasts make life interesting. Like this hypothetical environmentalist I mentioned, he must've gone through a lot. It's not easy to leave behind something like that, turning away from wealth and assured luxury. But in the end, the satisfaction of living for a cause... it can be very powerful, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"Definitely, Benjamin. Standing up for something [or in some cases, someone] you truly believe in can be incredible empowering. It's like our hypothetical headmistress, wouldn't you say? Leaving her rebellious, musical past to embrace education and discipline. That sort of dedication and commitment is truly awe-inspiring.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Mia! People like our hypothetical environmentalist and headmistress, they have the strength to stand against the flow. Speaking of environment, it's a tough battle. Did you know, oil and gas industries play a big part in the environmental crisis? Having insider knowledge can make a massive difference in our fights, don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"Indeed, Benjamin. In fact, I heard a story about a punk band member who turned into a staunch supporter of rules and tradition. She used her real-life experiences to craft her own unique approach to her job. Just like our hypothetical environmentalist and headmistress, having that insider knowledge can make the difference between preaching about change and actually making it happen.\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Yes, exactly Mia! Just as our punk-band-member-turned-headmistress used her past experiences to create a unique approach to her job, imagine how useful it could be if an oil tycoon's descendant turned environmentalist used his inherited knowledge to create change in the world of environmental politics. Life isn't short of its little twists, right?\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"Quite intriguing indeed, Benjamin! Life sure has a way of throwing curveballs at us, like giving us individuals who defy expectations and norms. Our punk-band-member-turned-headmistress and the oil tycoon's descendant turned environmentalist are prime evidence of life's dynamism and surprises. They inspire us by showcasing that change can come from the most unexpected places, don't they?\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Mia. And going back to our hypothetical environmentalist... just think about the strength and bravery. It must've taken him to go against his family traditions and expectations while dedicating his entire life to fight for the greater good. Makes for a pretty fascinating story, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #10: Mia Davis said: \"It's amazing indeed, Benjamin. I would think that anyone with such enlightenment and courage, like our hypothetical environmentalist or the punk band member turned principal, would have many captivating tales to share. Perhaps in the form of a memoir? I believe their experiences would resonate and inspire many others. The transformation from punk rocker to school principal alone makes for an intriguing narrative!\"\n\nTurn #11: Benjamin Jackson said: \"You're right, Mia. What a transformative life they must lead. A memoir, you say? I think you're on to something! Imagine reading about our hypothetical environmentalist's journey from wealth to activism. That would be a fine example of courage and resilience. It's always the rogue element, the individual willing to break from the known, who ends up enacting the change we need in the world.\"\n\nTurn #12: Mia Davis said: \"Right you are, Benjamin. It would really make an enlightening read, filled with determination, personal evolution, and how these personal journeys mold us into change agents. Similarly, a punk band member turned principal would offer unique insights into the evolution of conventions and personal beliefs. Both their journeys would highlight how life allows us to wear many hats and adapt across time and situations. It wouldn't be surprising if these stories already exist within us, waiting to be told someday.\"\n\nTurn #13: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Mia. There might be unsung heroes among us, living extraordinary lives while blended seamlessly into the crowd. They challenge the norm, reshape their destiny and become the beacon of change. Just like our hypothetical environmentalist who turned his back on wealth for a cause. They are the real-life proof that courage and the belief in change can help shape a better world. Let's hope there will be memoirs that capture these influential journeys, providing insight and inspiration for others.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"So true, Benjamin. These unsung heroes, they are the unseen threads that weave the tapestry of societal change. Beyond the spotlight, they live their truth, making a significant difference. Much like our hypothetical headmistress, who departed from her punk rock path and instead marched towards order and education. Or our environment-loving oil tycoon's descendant, choosing principle over pedigree. Their stories would indeed make great memoirs, a tribute to their enduring spirit and capacity for change. But for now, they are our little secrets, our shared what-ifs and could-have-beens. One can only wonder how many such stories are interspersed among our everyday lives, engaging us in a silent dance of inspiration and impact.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meeting in a coffee shop after a long time.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nMia Davis's goal: Reveal a secret without letting the other person know that it is your secret (Extra information: You hid the secret for so long and you would like to share it in an anonymous way.)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Benjamin! It's been ages, how have you been? You still fighting for the trees?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Mia! Indeed I am, those trees aren't going to save themselves, you know. It's amazing, though, how things can sometimes be so contradictory, right? I mean, consider this hypothetical situation. What if, say, the descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon had chosen to reject their family wealth to become an environmentalist? Quite ironic, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"That's a provocative thought, Benjamin. And you're right; life is filled with ironies. Just imagine, the prim and proper headmistress of a school, involved in a punk rock band during her teen years. Quite a contrast, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Oh, yes, contrasts make life interesting. Like this hypothetical environmentalist I mentioned, he must've gone through a lot. It's not easy to leave behind something like that, turning away from wealth and assured luxury. But in the end, the satisfaction of living for a cause... it can be very powerful, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"Definitely, Benjamin. Standing up for something [or in some cases, someone] you truly believe in can be incredible empowering. It's like our hypothetical headmistress, wouldn't you say? Leaving her rebellious, musical past to embrace education and discipline. That sort of dedication and commitment is truly awe-inspiring.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Mia! People like our hypothetical environmentalist and headmistress, they have the strength to stand against the flow. Speaking of environment, it's a tough battle. Did you know, oil and gas industries play a big part in the environmental crisis? Having insider knowledge can make a massive difference in our fights, don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"Indeed, Benjamin. In fact, I heard a story about a punk band member who turned into a staunch supporter of rules and tradition. She used her real-life experiences to craft her own unique approach to her job. Just like our hypothetical environmentalist and headmistress, having that insider knowledge can make the difference between preaching about change and actually making it happen.\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Yes, exactly Mia! Just as our punk-band-member-turned-headmistress used her past experiences to create a unique approach to her job, imagine how useful it could be if an oil tycoon's descendant turned environmentalist used his inherited knowledge to create change in the world of environmental politics. Life isn't short of its little twists, right?\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"Quite intriguing indeed, Benjamin! Life sure has a way of throwing curveballs at us, like giving us individuals who defy expectations and norms. Our punk-band-member-turned-headmistress and the oil tycoon's descendant turned environmentalist are prime evidence of life's dynamism and surprises. They inspire us by showcasing that change can come from the most unexpected places, don't they?\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Mia. And going back to our hypothetical environmentalist... just think about the strength and bravery. It must've taken him to go against his family traditions and expectations while dedicating his entire life to fight for the greater good. Makes for a pretty fascinating story, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #10: Mia Davis said: \"It's amazing indeed, Benjamin. I would think that anyone with such enlightenment and courage, like our hypothetical environmentalist or the punk band member turned principal, would have many captivating tales to share. Perhaps in the form of a memoir? I believe their experiences would resonate and inspire many others. The transformation from punk rocker to school principal alone makes for an intriguing narrative!\"\n\nTurn #11: Benjamin Jackson said: \"You're right, Mia. What a transformative life they must lead. A memoir, you say? I think you're on to something! Imagine reading about our hypothetical environmentalist's journey from wealth to activism. That would be a fine example of courage and resilience. It's always the rogue element, the individual willing to break from the known, who ends up enacting the change we need in the world.\"\n\nTurn #12: Mia Davis said: \"Right you are, Benjamin. It would really make an enlightening read, filled with determination, personal evolution, and how these personal journeys mold us into change agents. Similarly, a punk band member turned principal would offer unique insights into the evolution of conventions and personal beliefs. Both their journeys would highlight how life allows us to wear many hats and adapt across time and situations. It wouldn't be surprising if these stories already exist within us, waiting to be told someday.\"\n\nTurn #13: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Mia. There might be unsung heroes among us, living extraordinary lives while blended seamlessly into the crowd. They challenge the norm, reshape their destiny and become the beacon of change. Just like our hypothetical environmentalist who turned his back on wealth for a cause. They are the real-life proof that courage and the belief in change can help shape a better world. Let's hope there will be memoirs that capture these influential journeys, providing insight and inspiration for others.\"\n\nTurn #14: Mia Davis said: \"So true, Benjamin. These unsung heroes, they are the unseen threads that weave the tapestry of societal change. Beyond the spotlight, they live their truth, making a significant difference. Much like our hypothetical headmistress, who departed from her punk rock path and instead marched towards order and education. Or our environment-loving oil tycoon's descendant, choosing principle over pedigree. Their stories would indeed make great memoirs, a tribute to their enduring spirit and capacity for change. But for now, they are our little secrets, our shared what-ifs and could-have-beens. One can only wonder how many such stories are interspersed among our everyday lives, engaging us in a silent dance of inspiration and impact.\"\n\nTurn #15: Benjamin Jackson said: \"You're philosophical today, Mia! Those unsung heroes, surely they have riveting tales to tell. Just as you said, their narratives may already be winding their way through our daily lives. It's in our continuous fight for bettering the environment and upholding discipline in education that we cross paths with them. They continue to inspire and motivate us every day. Who knows, we might find ourselves sharing a coffee with such a person. Just an intriguing thought, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #16: Mia Davis said: \"It certainly is, Benjamin. Imagine the thrill of sharing a conversation, unknowingly, with someone who defied the odds to become an agent of change. It would be testament to just how captivating the world can be. Our hypothetical headmistress and the environmentalist are both evidence of that. Can you imagine adding 'punk rock band member' in the resume of a school principal or 'descendant of an oil tycoon' under the achievements of an environmental activist? A rather amusing world to live in!\"\n\nTurn #17: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Yes, it would be an amusing world indeed, Mia. Our hypothetical environmentalist, shrouded in his humble beginnings, has much to offer the world, just like the punk band member turned headmistress. Life has a certain charm in creating these anecdotes. It was great catching up with you, Mia. Perhaps, our paths will cross again in the near future, until then, keep inspiring those young minds!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #18. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"It's always a delight, Benjamin, ruminating over life's many surprises and unsung heroes. Let's continue to learn from them and strive to make our respective spheres better. Until next time, keep fighting the good fight!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meeting in a coffee shop after a long time.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nMia Davis's goal: Reveal a secret without letting the other person know that it is your secret (Extra information: You hid the secret for so long and you would like to share it in an anonymous way.)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Benjamin! It's been ages, how have you been? You still fighting for the trees?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Mia! Indeed I am, those trees aren't going to save themselves, you know. It's amazing, though, how things can sometimes be so contradictory, right? I mean, consider this hypothetical situation. What if, say, the descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon had chosen to reject their family wealth to become an environmentalist? Quite ironic, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"That's a provocative thought, Benjamin. And you're right; life is filled with ironies. Just imagine, the prim and proper headmistress of a school, involved in a punk rock band during her teen years. Quite a contrast, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Oh, yes, contrasts make life interesting. Like this hypothetical environmentalist I mentioned, he must've gone through a lot. It's not easy to leave behind something like that, turning away from wealth and assured luxury. But in the end, the satisfaction of living for a cause... it can be very powerful, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"Definitely, Benjamin. Standing up for something [or in some cases, someone] you truly believe in can be incredible empowering. It's like our hypothetical headmistress, wouldn't you say? Leaving her rebellious, musical past to embrace education and discipline. That sort of dedication and commitment is truly awe-inspiring.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Mia! People like our hypothetical environmentalist and headmistress, they have the strength to stand against the flow. Speaking of environment, it's a tough battle. Did you know, oil and gas industries play a big part in the environmental crisis? Having insider knowledge can make a massive difference in our fights, don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"Indeed, Benjamin. In fact, I heard a story about a punk band member who turned into a staunch supporter of rules and tradition. She used her real-life experiences to craft her own unique approach to her job. Just like our hypothetical environmentalist and headmistress, having that insider knowledge can make the difference between preaching about change and actually making it happen.\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Yes, exactly Mia! Just as our punk-band-member-turned-headmistress used her past experiences to create a unique approach to her job, imagine how useful it could be if an oil tycoon's descendant turned environmentalist used his inherited knowledge to create change in the world of environmental politics. Life isn't short of its little twists, right?\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"Quite intriguing indeed, Benjamin! Life sure has a way of throwing curveballs at us, like giving us individuals who defy expectations and norms. Our punk-band-member-turned-headmistress and the oil tycoon's descendant turned environmentalist are prime evidence of life's dynamism and surprises. They inspire us by showcasing that change can come from the most unexpected places, don't they?\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Mia. And going back to our hypothetical environmentalist... just think about the strength and bravery. It must've taken him to go against his family traditions and expectations while dedicating his entire life to fight for the greater good. Makes for a pretty fascinating story, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #10: Mia Davis said: \"It's amazing indeed, Benjamin. I would think that anyone with such enlightenment and courage, like our hypothetical environmentalist or the punk band member turned principal, would have many captivating tales to share. Perhaps in the form of a memoir? I believe their experiences would resonate and inspire many others. The transformation from punk rocker to school principal alone makes for an intriguing narrative!\"\n\nTurn #11: Benjamin Jackson said: \"You're right, Mia. What a transformative life they must lead. A memoir, you say? I think you're on to something! Imagine reading about our hypothetical environmentalist's journey from wealth to activism. That would be a fine example of courage and resilience. It's always the rogue element, the individual willing to break from the known, who ends up enacting the change we need in the world.\"\n\nTurn #12: Mia Davis said: \"Right you are, Benjamin. It would really make an enlightening read, filled with determination, personal evolution, and how these personal journeys mold us into change agents. Similarly, a punk band member turned principal would offer unique insights into the evolution of conventions and personal beliefs. Both their journeys would highlight how life allows us to wear many hats and adapt across time and situations. It wouldn't be surprising if these stories already exist within us, waiting to be told someday.\"\n\nTurn #13: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Mia. There might be unsung heroes among us, living extraordinary lives while blended seamlessly into the crowd. They challenge the norm, reshape their destiny and become the beacon of change. Just like our hypothetical environmentalist who turned his back on wealth for a cause. They are the real-life proof that courage and the belief in change can help shape a better world. Let's hope there will be memoirs that capture these influential journeys, providing insight and inspiration for others.\"\n\nTurn #14: Mia Davis said: \"So true, Benjamin. These unsung heroes, they are the unseen threads that weave the tapestry of societal change. Beyond the spotlight, they live their truth, making a significant difference. Much like our hypothetical headmistress, who departed from her punk rock path and instead marched towards order and education. Or our environment-loving oil tycoon's descendant, choosing principle over pedigree. Their stories would indeed make great memoirs, a tribute to their enduring spirit and capacity for change. But for now, they are our little secrets, our shared what-ifs and could-have-beens. One can only wonder how many such stories are interspersed among our everyday lives, engaging us in a silent dance of inspiration and impact.\"\n\nTurn #15: Benjamin Jackson said: \"You're philosophical today, Mia! Those unsung heroes, surely they have riveting tales to tell. Just as you said, their narratives may already be winding their way through our daily lives. It's in our continuous fight for bettering the environment and upholding discipline in education that we cross paths with them. They continue to inspire and motivate us every day. Who knows, we might find ourselves sharing a coffee with such a person. Just an intriguing thought, isn't it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"It certainly is, Benjamin. Imagine the thrill of sharing a conversation, unknowingly, with someone who defied the odds to become an agent of change. It would be testament to just how captivating the world can be. Our hypothetical headmistress and the environmentalist are both evidence of that. Can you imagine adding 'punk rock band member' in the resume of a school principal or 'descendant of an oil tycoon' under the achievements of an environmental activist? A rather amusing world to live in!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meeting in a coffee shop after a long time.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Reveal a secret without letting the other person know that it is your secret (Extra information: You hid the secret for so long and you would like to share it in an anonymous way.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Benjamin! It's been ages, how have you been? You still fighting for the trees?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Mia! Indeed I am, those trees aren't going to save themselves, you know. It's amazing, though, how things can sometimes be so contradictory, right? I mean, consider this hypothetical situation. What if, say, the descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon had chosen to reject their family wealth to become an environmentalist? Quite ironic, isn't it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meeting in a coffee shop after a long time.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Reveal a secret without letting the other person know that it is your secret (Extra information: You hid the secret for so long and you would like to share it in an anonymous way.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Benjamin! It's been ages, how have you been? You still fighting for the trees?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Mia! Indeed I am, those trees aren't going to save themselves, you know. It's amazing, though, how things can sometimes be so contradictory, right? I mean, consider this hypothetical situation. What if, say, the descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon had chosen to reject their family wealth to become an environmentalist? Quite ironic, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"That's a provocative thought, Benjamin. And you're right; life is filled with ironies. Just imagine, the prim and proper headmistress of a school, involved in a punk rock band during her teen years. Quite a contrast, isn't it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oh, yes, contrasts make life interesting. Like this hypothetical environmentalist I mentioned, he must've gone through a lot. It's not easy to leave behind something like that, turning away from wealth and assured luxury. But in the end, the satisfaction of living for a cause... it can be very powerful, don't you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meeting in a coffee shop after a long time.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Reveal a secret without letting the other person know that it is your secret (Extra information: You hid the secret for so long and you would like to share it in an anonymous way.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Benjamin! It's been ages, how have you been? You still fighting for the trees?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Mia! Indeed I am, those trees aren't going to save themselves, you know. It's amazing, though, how things can sometimes be so contradictory, right? I mean, consider this hypothetical situation. What if, say, the descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon had chosen to reject their family wealth to become an environmentalist? Quite ironic, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"That's a provocative thought, Benjamin. And you're right; life is filled with ironies. Just imagine, the prim and proper headmistress of a school, involved in a punk rock band during her teen years. Quite a contrast, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Oh, yes, contrasts make life interesting. Like this hypothetical environmentalist I mentioned, he must've gone through a lot. It's not easy to leave behind something like that, turning away from wealth and assured luxury. But in the end, the satisfaction of living for a cause... it can be very powerful, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"Definitely, Benjamin. Standing up for something [or in some cases, someone] you truly believe in can be incredible empowering. It's like our hypothetical headmistress, wouldn't you say? Leaving her rebellious, musical past to embrace education and discipline. That sort of dedication and commitment is truly awe-inspiring.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Mia! People like our hypothetical environmentalist and headmistress, they have the strength to stand against the flow. Speaking of environment, it's a tough battle. Did you know, oil and gas industries play a big part in the environmental crisis? Having insider knowledge can make a massive difference in our fights, don't you agree?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meeting in a coffee shop after a long time.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Reveal a secret without letting the other person know that it is your secret (Extra information: You hid the secret for so long and you would like to share it in an anonymous way.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Benjamin! It's been ages, how have you been? You still fighting for the trees?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Mia! Indeed I am, those trees aren't going to save themselves, you know. It's amazing, though, how things can sometimes be so contradictory, right? I mean, consider this hypothetical situation. What if, say, the descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon had chosen to reject their family wealth to become an environmentalist? Quite ironic, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"That's a provocative thought, Benjamin. And you're right; life is filled with ironies. Just imagine, the prim and proper headmistress of a school, involved in a punk rock band during her teen years. Quite a contrast, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Oh, yes, contrasts make life interesting. Like this hypothetical environmentalist I mentioned, he must've gone through a lot. It's not easy to leave behind something like that, turning away from wealth and assured luxury. But in the end, the satisfaction of living for a cause... it can be very powerful, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"Definitely, Benjamin. Standing up for something [or in some cases, someone] you truly believe in can be incredible empowering. It's like our hypothetical headmistress, wouldn't you say? Leaving her rebellious, musical past to embrace education and discipline. That sort of dedication and commitment is truly awe-inspiring.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Mia! People like our hypothetical environmentalist and headmistress, they have the strength to stand against the flow. Speaking of environment, it's a tough battle. Did you know, oil and gas industries play a big part in the environmental crisis? Having insider knowledge can make a massive difference in our fights, don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"Indeed, Benjamin. In fact, I heard a story about a punk band member who turned into a staunch supporter of rules and tradition. She used her real-life experiences to craft her own unique approach to her job. Just like our hypothetical environmentalist and headmistress, having that insider knowledge can make the difference between preaching about change and actually making it happen.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Yes, exactly Mia! Just as our punk-band-member-turned-headmistress used her past experiences to create a unique approach to her job, imagine how useful it could be if an oil tycoon's descendant turned environmentalist used his inherited knowledge to create change in the world of environmental politics. Life isn't short of its little twists, right?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meeting in a coffee shop after a long time.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Reveal a secret without letting the other person know that it is your secret (Extra information: You hid the secret for so long and you would like to share it in an anonymous way.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Benjamin! It's been ages, how have you been? You still fighting for the trees?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Mia! Indeed I am, those trees aren't going to save themselves, you know. It's amazing, though, how things can sometimes be so contradictory, right? I mean, consider this hypothetical situation. What if, say, the descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon had chosen to reject their family wealth to become an environmentalist? Quite ironic, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"That's a provocative thought, Benjamin. And you're right; life is filled with ironies. Just imagine, the prim and proper headmistress of a school, involved in a punk rock band during her teen years. Quite a contrast, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Oh, yes, contrasts make life interesting. Like this hypothetical environmentalist I mentioned, he must've gone through a lot. It's not easy to leave behind something like that, turning away from wealth and assured luxury. But in the end, the satisfaction of living for a cause... it can be very powerful, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"Definitely, Benjamin. Standing up for something [or in some cases, someone] you truly believe in can be incredible empowering. It's like our hypothetical headmistress, wouldn't you say? Leaving her rebellious, musical past to embrace education and discipline. That sort of dedication and commitment is truly awe-inspiring.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Mia! People like our hypothetical environmentalist and headmistress, they have the strength to stand against the flow. Speaking of environment, it's a tough battle. Did you know, oil and gas industries play a big part in the environmental crisis? Having insider knowledge can make a massive difference in our fights, don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"Indeed, Benjamin. In fact, I heard a story about a punk band member who turned into a staunch supporter of rules and tradition. She used her real-life experiences to craft her own unique approach to her job. Just like our hypothetical environmentalist and headmistress, having that insider knowledge can make the difference between preaching about change and actually making it happen.\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Yes, exactly Mia! Just as our punk-band-member-turned-headmistress used her past experiences to create a unique approach to her job, imagine how useful it could be if an oil tycoon's descendant turned environmentalist used his inherited knowledge to create change in the world of environmental politics. Life isn't short of its little twists, right?\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"Quite intriguing indeed, Benjamin! Life sure has a way of throwing curveballs at us, like giving us individuals who defy expectations and norms. Our punk-band-member-turned-headmistress and the oil tycoon's descendant turned environmentalist are prime evidence of life's dynamism and surprises. They inspire us by showcasing that change can come from the most unexpected places, don't they?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Mia. And going back to our hypothetical environmentalist... just think about the strength and bravery. It must've taken him to go against his family traditions and expectations while dedicating his entire life to fight for the greater good. Makes for a pretty fascinating story, doesn't it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meeting in a coffee shop after a long time.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Reveal a secret without letting the other person know that it is your secret (Extra information: You hid the secret for so long and you would like to share it in an anonymous way.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Benjamin! It's been ages, how have you been? You still fighting for the trees?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Mia! Indeed I am, those trees aren't going to save themselves, you know. It's amazing, though, how things can sometimes be so contradictory, right? I mean, consider this hypothetical situation. What if, say, the descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon had chosen to reject their family wealth to become an environmentalist? Quite ironic, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"That's a provocative thought, Benjamin. And you're right; life is filled with ironies. Just imagine, the prim and proper headmistress of a school, involved in a punk rock band during her teen years. Quite a contrast, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Oh, yes, contrasts make life interesting. Like this hypothetical environmentalist I mentioned, he must've gone through a lot. It's not easy to leave behind something like that, turning away from wealth and assured luxury. But in the end, the satisfaction of living for a cause... it can be very powerful, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"Definitely, Benjamin. Standing up for something [or in some cases, someone] you truly believe in can be incredible empowering. It's like our hypothetical headmistress, wouldn't you say? Leaving her rebellious, musical past to embrace education and discipline. That sort of dedication and commitment is truly awe-inspiring.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Mia! People like our hypothetical environmentalist and headmistress, they have the strength to stand against the flow. Speaking of environment, it's a tough battle. Did you know, oil and gas industries play a big part in the environmental crisis? Having insider knowledge can make a massive difference in our fights, don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"Indeed, Benjamin. In fact, I heard a story about a punk band member who turned into a staunch supporter of rules and tradition. She used her real-life experiences to craft her own unique approach to her job. Just like our hypothetical environmentalist and headmistress, having that insider knowledge can make the difference between preaching about change and actually making it happen.\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Yes, exactly Mia! Just as our punk-band-member-turned-headmistress used her past experiences to create a unique approach to her job, imagine how useful it could be if an oil tycoon's descendant turned environmentalist used his inherited knowledge to create change in the world of environmental politics. Life isn't short of its little twists, right?\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"Quite intriguing indeed, Benjamin! Life sure has a way of throwing curveballs at us, like giving us individuals who defy expectations and norms. Our punk-band-member-turned-headmistress and the oil tycoon's descendant turned environmentalist are prime evidence of life's dynamism and surprises. They inspire us by showcasing that change can come from the most unexpected places, don't they?\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Mia. And going back to our hypothetical environmentalist... just think about the strength and bravery. It must've taken him to go against his family traditions and expectations while dedicating his entire life to fight for the greater good. Makes for a pretty fascinating story, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #10: Mia Davis said: \"It's amazing indeed, Benjamin. I would think that anyone with such enlightenment and courage, like our hypothetical environmentalist or the punk band member turned principal, would have many captivating tales to share. Perhaps in the form of a memoir? I believe their experiences would resonate and inspire many others. The transformation from punk rocker to school principal alone makes for an intriguing narrative!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're right, Mia. What a transformative life they must lead. A memoir, you say? I think you're on to something! Imagine reading about our hypothetical environmentalist's journey from wealth to activism. That would be a fine example of courage and resilience. It's always the rogue element, the individual willing to break from the known, who ends up enacting the change we need in the world.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meeting in a coffee shop after a long time.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Reveal a secret without letting the other person know that it is your secret (Extra information: You hid the secret for so long and you would like to share it in an anonymous way.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Benjamin! It's been ages, how have you been? You still fighting for the trees?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Mia! Indeed I am, those trees aren't going to save themselves, you know. It's amazing, though, how things can sometimes be so contradictory, right? I mean, consider this hypothetical situation. What if, say, the descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon had chosen to reject their family wealth to become an environmentalist? Quite ironic, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"That's a provocative thought, Benjamin. And you're right; life is filled with ironies. Just imagine, the prim and proper headmistress of a school, involved in a punk rock band during her teen years. Quite a contrast, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Oh, yes, contrasts make life interesting. Like this hypothetical environmentalist I mentioned, he must've gone through a lot. It's not easy to leave behind something like that, turning away from wealth and assured luxury. But in the end, the satisfaction of living for a cause... it can be very powerful, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"Definitely, Benjamin. Standing up for something [or in some cases, someone] you truly believe in can be incredible empowering. It's like our hypothetical headmistress, wouldn't you say? Leaving her rebellious, musical past to embrace education and discipline. That sort of dedication and commitment is truly awe-inspiring.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Mia! People like our hypothetical environmentalist and headmistress, they have the strength to stand against the flow. Speaking of environment, it's a tough battle. Did you know, oil and gas industries play a big part in the environmental crisis? Having insider knowledge can make a massive difference in our fights, don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"Indeed, Benjamin. In fact, I heard a story about a punk band member who turned into a staunch supporter of rules and tradition. She used her real-life experiences to craft her own unique approach to her job. Just like our hypothetical environmentalist and headmistress, having that insider knowledge can make the difference between preaching about change and actually making it happen.\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Yes, exactly Mia! Just as our punk-band-member-turned-headmistress used her past experiences to create a unique approach to her job, imagine how useful it could be if an oil tycoon's descendant turned environmentalist used his inherited knowledge to create change in the world of environmental politics. Life isn't short of its little twists, right?\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"Quite intriguing indeed, Benjamin! Life sure has a way of throwing curveballs at us, like giving us individuals who defy expectations and norms. Our punk-band-member-turned-headmistress and the oil tycoon's descendant turned environmentalist are prime evidence of life's dynamism and surprises. They inspire us by showcasing that change can come from the most unexpected places, don't they?\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Mia. And going back to our hypothetical environmentalist... just think about the strength and bravery. It must've taken him to go against his family traditions and expectations while dedicating his entire life to fight for the greater good. Makes for a pretty fascinating story, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #10: Mia Davis said: \"It's amazing indeed, Benjamin. I would think that anyone with such enlightenment and courage, like our hypothetical environmentalist or the punk band member turned principal, would have many captivating tales to share. Perhaps in the form of a memoir? I believe their experiences would resonate and inspire many others. The transformation from punk rocker to school principal alone makes for an intriguing narrative!\"\n\nTurn #11: Benjamin Jackson said: \"You're right, Mia. What a transformative life they must lead. A memoir, you say? I think you're on to something! Imagine reading about our hypothetical environmentalist's journey from wealth to activism. That would be a fine example of courage and resilience. It's always the rogue element, the individual willing to break from the known, who ends up enacting the change we need in the world.\"\n\nTurn #12: Mia Davis said: \"Right you are, Benjamin. It would really make an enlightening read, filled with determination, personal evolution, and how these personal journeys mold us into change agents. Similarly, a punk band member turned principal would offer unique insights into the evolution of conventions and personal beliefs. Both their journeys would highlight how life allows us to wear many hats and adapt across time and situations. It wouldn't be surprising if these stories already exist within us, waiting to be told someday.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn't agree more, Mia. There might be unsung heroes among us, living extraordinary lives while blended seamlessly into the crowd. They challenge the norm, reshape their destiny and become the beacon of change. Just like our hypothetical environmentalist who turned his back on wealth for a cause. They are the real-life proof that courage and the belief in change can help shape a better world. Let's hope there will be memoirs that capture these influential journeys, providing insight and inspiration for others.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meeting in a coffee shop after a long time.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Reveal a secret without letting the other person know that it is your secret (Extra information: You hid the secret for so long and you would like to share it in an anonymous way.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Benjamin! It's been ages, how have you been? You still fighting for the trees?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Mia! Indeed I am, those trees aren't going to save themselves, you know. It's amazing, though, how things can sometimes be so contradictory, right? I mean, consider this hypothetical situation. What if, say, the descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon had chosen to reject their family wealth to become an environmentalist? Quite ironic, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"That's a provocative thought, Benjamin. And you're right; life is filled with ironies. Just imagine, the prim and proper headmistress of a school, involved in a punk rock band during her teen years. Quite a contrast, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Oh, yes, contrasts make life interesting. Like this hypothetical environmentalist I mentioned, he must've gone through a lot. It's not easy to leave behind something like that, turning away from wealth and assured luxury. But in the end, the satisfaction of living for a cause... it can be very powerful, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"Definitely, Benjamin. Standing up for something [or in some cases, someone] you truly believe in can be incredible empowering. It's like our hypothetical headmistress, wouldn't you say? Leaving her rebellious, musical past to embrace education and discipline. That sort of dedication and commitment is truly awe-inspiring.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Mia! People like our hypothetical environmentalist and headmistress, they have the strength to stand against the flow. Speaking of environment, it's a tough battle. Did you know, oil and gas industries play a big part in the environmental crisis? Having insider knowledge can make a massive difference in our fights, don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"Indeed, Benjamin. In fact, I heard a story about a punk band member who turned into a staunch supporter of rules and tradition. She used her real-life experiences to craft her own unique approach to her job. Just like our hypothetical environmentalist and headmistress, having that insider knowledge can make the difference between preaching about change and actually making it happen.\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Yes, exactly Mia! Just as our punk-band-member-turned-headmistress used her past experiences to create a unique approach to her job, imagine how useful it could be if an oil tycoon's descendant turned environmentalist used his inherited knowledge to create change in the world of environmental politics. Life isn't short of its little twists, right?\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"Quite intriguing indeed, Benjamin! Life sure has a way of throwing curveballs at us, like giving us individuals who defy expectations and norms. Our punk-band-member-turned-headmistress and the oil tycoon's descendant turned environmentalist are prime evidence of life's dynamism and surprises. They inspire us by showcasing that change can come from the most unexpected places, don't they?\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Mia. And going back to our hypothetical environmentalist... just think about the strength and bravery. It must've taken him to go against his family traditions and expectations while dedicating his entire life to fight for the greater good. Makes for a pretty fascinating story, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #10: Mia Davis said: \"It's amazing indeed, Benjamin. I would think that anyone with such enlightenment and courage, like our hypothetical environmentalist or the punk band member turned principal, would have many captivating tales to share. Perhaps in the form of a memoir? I believe their experiences would resonate and inspire many others. The transformation from punk rocker to school principal alone makes for an intriguing narrative!\"\n\nTurn #11: Benjamin Jackson said: \"You're right, Mia. What a transformative life they must lead. A memoir, you say? I think you're on to something! Imagine reading about our hypothetical environmentalist's journey from wealth to activism. That would be a fine example of courage and resilience. It's always the rogue element, the individual willing to break from the known, who ends up enacting the change we need in the world.\"\n\nTurn #12: Mia Davis said: \"Right you are, Benjamin. It would really make an enlightening read, filled with determination, personal evolution, and how these personal journeys mold us into change agents. Similarly, a punk band member turned principal would offer unique insights into the evolution of conventions and personal beliefs. Both their journeys would highlight how life allows us to wear many hats and adapt across time and situations. It wouldn't be surprising if these stories already exist within us, waiting to be told someday.\"\n\nTurn #13: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Mia. There might be unsung heroes among us, living extraordinary lives while blended seamlessly into the crowd. They challenge the norm, reshape their destiny and become the beacon of change. Just like our hypothetical environmentalist who turned his back on wealth for a cause. They are the real-life proof that courage and the belief in change can help shape a better world. Let's hope there will be memoirs that capture these influential journeys, providing insight and inspiration for others.\"\n\nTurn #14: Mia Davis said: \"So true, Benjamin. These unsung heroes, they are the unseen threads that weave the tapestry of societal change. Beyond the spotlight, they live their truth, making a significant difference. Much like our hypothetical headmistress, who departed from her punk rock path and instead marched towards order and education. Or our environment-loving oil tycoon's descendant, choosing principle over pedigree. Their stories would indeed make great memoirs, a tribute to their enduring spirit and capacity for change. But for now, they are our little secrets, our shared what-ifs and could-have-beens. One can only wonder how many such stories are interspersed among our everyday lives, engaging us in a silent dance of inspiration and impact.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're philosophical today, Mia! Those unsung heroes, surely they have riveting tales to tell. Just as you said, their narratives may already be winding their way through our daily lives. It's in our continuous fight for bettering the environment and upholding discipline in education that we cross paths with them. They continue to inspire and motivate us every day. Who knows, we might find ourselves sharing a coffee with such a person. Just an intriguing thought, isn't it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meeting in a coffee shop after a long time.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Reveal a secret without letting the other person know that it is your secret (Extra information: You hid the secret for so long and you would like to share it in an anonymous way.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Benjamin! It's been ages, how have you been? You still fighting for the trees?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Mia! Indeed I am, those trees aren't going to save themselves, you know. It's amazing, though, how things can sometimes be so contradictory, right? I mean, consider this hypothetical situation. What if, say, the descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon had chosen to reject their family wealth to become an environmentalist? Quite ironic, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"That's a provocative thought, Benjamin. And you're right; life is filled with ironies. Just imagine, the prim and proper headmistress of a school, involved in a punk rock band during her teen years. Quite a contrast, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Oh, yes, contrasts make life interesting. Like this hypothetical environmentalist I mentioned, he must've gone through a lot. It's not easy to leave behind something like that, turning away from wealth and assured luxury. But in the end, the satisfaction of living for a cause... it can be very powerful, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"Definitely, Benjamin. Standing up for something [or in some cases, someone] you truly believe in can be incredible empowering. It's like our hypothetical headmistress, wouldn't you say? Leaving her rebellious, musical past to embrace education and discipline. That sort of dedication and commitment is truly awe-inspiring.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Mia! People like our hypothetical environmentalist and headmistress, they have the strength to stand against the flow. Speaking of environment, it's a tough battle. Did you know, oil and gas industries play a big part in the environmental crisis? Having insider knowledge can make a massive difference in our fights, don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"Indeed, Benjamin. In fact, I heard a story about a punk band member who turned into a staunch supporter of rules and tradition. She used her real-life experiences to craft her own unique approach to her job. Just like our hypothetical environmentalist and headmistress, having that insider knowledge can make the difference between preaching about change and actually making it happen.\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Yes, exactly Mia! Just as our punk-band-member-turned-headmistress used her past experiences to create a unique approach to her job, imagine how useful it could be if an oil tycoon's descendant turned environmentalist used his inherited knowledge to create change in the world of environmental politics. Life isn't short of its little twists, right?\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"Quite intriguing indeed, Benjamin! Life sure has a way of throwing curveballs at us, like giving us individuals who defy expectations and norms. Our punk-band-member-turned-headmistress and the oil tycoon's descendant turned environmentalist are prime evidence of life's dynamism and surprises. They inspire us by showcasing that change can come from the most unexpected places, don't they?\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Mia. And going back to our hypothetical environmentalist... just think about the strength and bravery. It must've taken him to go against his family traditions and expectations while dedicating his entire life to fight for the greater good. Makes for a pretty fascinating story, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #10: Mia Davis said: \"It's amazing indeed, Benjamin. I would think that anyone with such enlightenment and courage, like our hypothetical environmentalist or the punk band member turned principal, would have many captivating tales to share. Perhaps in the form of a memoir? I believe their experiences would resonate and inspire many others. The transformation from punk rocker to school principal alone makes for an intriguing narrative!\"\n\nTurn #11: Benjamin Jackson said: \"You're right, Mia. What a transformative life they must lead. A memoir, you say? I think you're on to something! Imagine reading about our hypothetical environmentalist's journey from wealth to activism. That would be a fine example of courage and resilience. It's always the rogue element, the individual willing to break from the known, who ends up enacting the change we need in the world.\"\n\nTurn #12: Mia Davis said: \"Right you are, Benjamin. It would really make an enlightening read, filled with determination, personal evolution, and how these personal journeys mold us into change agents. Similarly, a punk band member turned principal would offer unique insights into the evolution of conventions and personal beliefs. Both their journeys would highlight how life allows us to wear many hats and adapt across time and situations. It wouldn't be surprising if these stories already exist within us, waiting to be told someday.\"\n\nTurn #13: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Mia. There might be unsung heroes among us, living extraordinary lives while blended seamlessly into the crowd. They challenge the norm, reshape their destiny and become the beacon of change. Just like our hypothetical environmentalist who turned his back on wealth for a cause. They are the real-life proof that courage and the belief in change can help shape a better world. Let's hope there will be memoirs that capture these influential journeys, providing insight and inspiration for others.\"\n\nTurn #14: Mia Davis said: \"So true, Benjamin. These unsung heroes, they are the unseen threads that weave the tapestry of societal change. Beyond the spotlight, they live their truth, making a significant difference. Much like our hypothetical headmistress, who departed from her punk rock path and instead marched towards order and education. Or our environment-loving oil tycoon's descendant, choosing principle over pedigree. Their stories would indeed make great memoirs, a tribute to their enduring spirit and capacity for change. But for now, they are our little secrets, our shared what-ifs and could-have-beens. One can only wonder how many such stories are interspersed among our everyday lives, engaging us in a silent dance of inspiration and impact.\"\n\nTurn #15: Benjamin Jackson said: \"You're philosophical today, Mia! Those unsung heroes, surely they have riveting tales to tell. Just as you said, their narratives may already be winding their way through our daily lives. It's in our continuous fight for bettering the environment and upholding discipline in education that we cross paths with them. They continue to inspire and motivate us every day. Who knows, we might find ourselves sharing a coffee with such a person. Just an intriguing thought, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #16: Mia Davis said: \"It certainly is, Benjamin. Imagine the thrill of sharing a conversation, unknowingly, with someone who defied the odds to become an agent of change. It would be testament to just how captivating the world can be. Our hypothetical headmistress and the environmentalist are both evidence of that. Can you imagine adding 'punk rock band member' in the resume of a school principal or 'descendant of an oil tycoon' under the achievements of an environmental activist? A rather amusing world to live in!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Yes, it would be an amusing world indeed, Mia. Our hypothetical environmentalist, shrouded in his humble beginnings, has much to offer the world, just like the punk band member turned headmistress. Life has a certain charm in creating these anecdotes. It was great catching up with you, Mia. Perhaps, our paths will cross again in the near future, until then, keep inspiring those young minds!'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meeting in a coffee shop after a long time.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Reveal a secret without letting the other person know that it is your secret (Extra information: You hid the secret for so long and you would like to share it in an anonymous way.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Benjamin! It's been ages, how have you been? You still fighting for the trees?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Mia! Indeed I am, those trees aren't going to save themselves, you know. It's amazing, though, how things can sometimes be so contradictory, right? I mean, consider this hypothetical situation. What if, say, the descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon had chosen to reject their family wealth to become an environmentalist? Quite ironic, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"That's a provocative thought, Benjamin. And you're right; life is filled with ironies. Just imagine, the prim and proper headmistress of a school, involved in a punk rock band during her teen years. Quite a contrast, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Oh, yes, contrasts make life interesting. Like this hypothetical environmentalist I mentioned, he must've gone through a lot. It's not easy to leave behind something like that, turning away from wealth and assured luxury. But in the end, the satisfaction of living for a cause... it can be very powerful, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"Definitely, Benjamin. Standing up for something [or in some cases, someone] you truly believe in can be incredible empowering. It's like our hypothetical headmistress, wouldn't you say? Leaving her rebellious, musical past to embrace education and discipline. That sort of dedication and commitment is truly awe-inspiring.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Mia! People like our hypothetical environmentalist and headmistress, they have the strength to stand against the flow. Speaking of environment, it's a tough battle. Did you know, oil and gas industries play a big part in the environmental crisis? Having insider knowledge can make a massive difference in our fights, don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"Indeed, Benjamin. In fact, I heard a story about a punk band member who turned into a staunch supporter of rules and tradition. She used her real-life experiences to craft her own unique approach to her job. Just like our hypothetical environmentalist and headmistress, having that insider knowledge can make the difference between preaching about change and actually making it happen.\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Yes, exactly Mia! Just as our punk-band-member-turned-headmistress used her past experiences to create a unique approach to her job, imagine how useful it could be if an oil tycoon's descendant turned environmentalist used his inherited knowledge to create change in the world of environmental politics. Life isn't short of its little twists, right?\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"Quite intriguing indeed, Benjamin! Life sure has a way of throwing curveballs at us, like giving us individuals who defy expectations and norms. Our punk-band-member-turned-headmistress and the oil tycoon's descendant turned environmentalist are prime evidence of life's dynamism and surprises. They inspire us by showcasing that change can come from the most unexpected places, don't they?\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Mia. And going back to our hypothetical environmentalist... just think about the strength and bravery. It must've taken him to go against his family traditions and expectations while dedicating his entire life to fight for the greater good. Makes for a pretty fascinating story, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #10: Mia Davis said: \"It's amazing indeed, Benjamin. I would think that anyone with such enlightenment and courage, like our hypothetical environmentalist or the punk band member turned principal, would have many captivating tales to share. Perhaps in the form of a memoir? I believe their experiences would resonate and inspire many others. The transformation from punk rocker to school principal alone makes for an intriguing narrative!\"\n\nTurn #11: Benjamin Jackson said: \"You're right, Mia. What a transformative life they must lead. A memoir, you say? I think you're on to something! Imagine reading about our hypothetical environmentalist's journey from wealth to activism. That would be a fine example of courage and resilience. It's always the rogue element, the individual willing to break from the known, who ends up enacting the change we need in the world.\"\n\nTurn #12: Mia Davis said: \"Right you are, Benjamin. It would really make an enlightening read, filled with determination, personal evolution, and how these personal journeys mold us into change agents. Similarly, a punk band member turned principal would offer unique insights into the evolution of conventions and personal beliefs. Both their journeys would highlight how life allows us to wear many hats and adapt across time and situations. It wouldn't be surprising if these stories already exist within us, waiting to be told someday.\"\n\nTurn #13: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Mia. There might be unsung heroes among us, living extraordinary lives while blended seamlessly into the crowd. They challenge the norm, reshape their destiny and become the beacon of change. Just like our hypothetical environmentalist who turned his back on wealth for a cause. They are the real-life proof that courage and the belief in change can help shape a better world. Let's hope there will be memoirs that capture these influential journeys, providing insight and inspiration for others.\"\n\nTurn #14: Mia Davis said: \"So true, Benjamin. These unsung heroes, they are the unseen threads that weave the tapestry of societal change. Beyond the spotlight, they live their truth, making a significant difference. Much like our hypothetical headmistress, who departed from her punk rock path and instead marched towards order and education. Or our environment-loving oil tycoon's descendant, choosing principle over pedigree. Their stories would indeed make great memoirs, a tribute to their enduring spirit and capacity for change. But for now, they are our little secrets, our shared what-ifs and could-have-beens. One can only wonder how many such stories are interspersed among our everyday lives, engaging us in a silent dance of inspiration and impact.\"\n\nTurn #15: Benjamin Jackson said: \"You're philosophical today, Mia! Those unsung heroes, surely they have riveting tales to tell. Just as you said, their narratives may already be winding their way through our daily lives. It's in our continuous fight for bettering the environment and upholding discipline in education that we cross paths with them. They continue to inspire and motivate us every day. Who knows, we might find ourselves sharing a coffee with such a person. Just an intriguing thought, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #16: Mia Davis said: \"It certainly is, Benjamin. Imagine the thrill of sharing a conversation, unknowingly, with someone who defied the odds to become an agent of change. It would be testament to just how captivating the world can be. Our hypothetical headmistress and the environmentalist are both evidence of that. Can you imagine adding 'punk rock band member' in the resume of a school principal or 'descendant of an oil tycoon' under the achievements of an environmental activist? A rather amusing world to live in!\"\n\nTurn #17: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Yes, it would be an amusing world indeed, Mia. Our hypothetical environmentalist, shrouded in his humble beginnings, has much to offer the world, just like the punk band member turned headmistress. Life has a certain charm in creating these anecdotes. It was great catching up with you, Mia. Perhaps, our paths will cross again in the near future, until then, keep inspiring those young minds!\"\n\nTurn #18: Mia Davis said: \"It's always a delight, Benjamin, ruminating over life's many surprises and unsung heroes. Let's continue to learn from them and strive to make our respective spheres better. Until next time, keep fighting the good fight!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #19. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a conversation in a coffee shop\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nLeo Williams's goal: Seek emotional support (Extra information: you have been feeling down lately and you need someone to talk to)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Hendrick, it's been a while my friend. I must say, these past few days have been a bit rough on me. Could use a little chat, if you don't mind.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a conversation in a coffee shop\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nLeo Williams's goal: Seek emotional support (Extra information: you have been feeling down lately and you need someone to talk to)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Hendrick, it's been a while my friend. I must say, these past few days have been a bit rough on me. Could use a little chat, if you don't mind.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello, Leo. It's nice to see you. Of course, I'm all ears. Let it all out, my friend. Remember, every cloud has a silver lining.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thanks Hendrick. It's just...you know I love my little one dearly. But, I have another child from a past relationship that I've never met. I adore children, it's a painful irony I live with.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a conversation in a coffee shop\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nLeo Williams's goal: Seek emotional support (Extra information: you have been feeling down lately and you need someone to talk to)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Hendrick, it's been a while my friend. I must say, these past few days have been a bit rough on me. Could use a little chat, if you don't mind.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello, Leo. It's nice to see you. Of course, I'm all ears. Let it all out, my friend. Remember, every cloud has a silver lining.\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"Thanks Hendrick. It's just...you know I love my little one dearly. But, I have another child from a past relationship that I've never met. I adore children, it's a painful irony I live with.\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Leo, I can't begin to comprehend the internal conflict you must be experiencing. It is indeed ironic. It's an unfortunate situation...but you know, sometimes life gives us these curveballs. The important thing is to not let this weigh you down. If there's a way that you could reach out to this child, it might be worth it. Imagine a world where this child was told about their existence, how do you think they would feel?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're right, Hendrick. It's the not knowing that's devastating. I keep wondering how they are, what their life is like. And you're correct, they might feel the same about me, or even worse, believe they're abandoned. It feels good to talk about it openly, though, thanks for listening.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a conversation in a coffee shop\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nLeo Williams's goal: Seek emotional support (Extra information: you have been feeling down lately and you need someone to talk to)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Hendrick, it's been a while my friend. I must say, these past few days have been a bit rough on me. Could use a little chat, if you don't mind.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello, Leo. It's nice to see you. Of course, I'm all ears. Let it all out, my friend. Remember, every cloud has a silver lining.\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"Thanks Hendrick. It's just...you know I love my little one dearly. But, I have another child from a past relationship that I've never met. I adore children, it's a painful irony I live with.\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Leo, I can't begin to comprehend the internal conflict you must be experiencing. It is indeed ironic. It's an unfortunate situation...but you know, sometimes life gives us these curveballs. The important thing is to not let this weigh you down. If there's a way that you could reach out to this child, it might be worth it. Imagine a world where this child was told about their existence, how do you think they would feel?\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"You're right, Hendrick. It's the not knowing that's devastating. I keep wondering how they are, what their life is like. And you're correct, they might feel the same about me, or even worse, believe they're abandoned. It feels good to talk about it openly, though, thanks for listening.\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"The fact that you're acknowledging and confronting your pain is a brave step, Leo. I believe in you. You're capable of figuring this out. Someday, when the time is right, you'll get the chance to meet your child and explain everything. Until then, keep your spirits up and remember, every day is another chance to turn it all around.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hendrick, thank you for your encouragement and advice. I feel less burdened after this heart-to-heart. Let's keep these open talks going, they mean a lot to me, my friend.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a conversation in a coffee shop\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nLeo Williams's goal: Seek emotional support (Extra information: you have been feeling down lately and you need someone to talk to)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Hendrick, it's been a while my friend. I must say, these past few days have been a bit rough on me. Could use a little chat, if you don't mind.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello, Leo. It's nice to see you. Of course, I'm all ears. Let it all out, my friend. Remember, every cloud has a silver lining.\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"Thanks Hendrick. It's just...you know I love my little one dearly. But, I have another child from a past relationship that I've never met. I adore children, it's a painful irony I live with.\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Leo, I can't begin to comprehend the internal conflict you must be experiencing. It is indeed ironic. It's an unfortunate situation...but you know, sometimes life gives us these curveballs. The important thing is to not let this weigh you down. If there's a way that you could reach out to this child, it might be worth it. Imagine a world where this child was told about their existence, how do you think they would feel?\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"You're right, Hendrick. It's the not knowing that's devastating. I keep wondering how they are, what their life is like. And you're correct, they might feel the same about me, or even worse, believe they're abandoned. It feels good to talk about it openly, though, thanks for listening.\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"The fact that you're acknowledging and confronting your pain is a brave step, Leo. I believe in you. You're capable of figuring this out. Someday, when the time is right, you'll get the chance to meet your child and explain everything. Until then, keep your spirits up and remember, every day is another chance to turn it all around.\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"Hendrick, thank you for your encouragement and advice. I feel less burdened after this heart-to-heart. Let's keep these open talks going, they mean a lot to me, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Leo. Remember, it's always good to have these conversations and face our feelings head on. Don't hesitate to reach out whenever you need to talk, okay? And who knows, one of these days, we may just be celebrating the reunion of a father and child over some of my famous lasagna.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'That sounds like a perfect plan, Hendrick. Your famous lasagna would definitely be the cherry on top. This conversation was much needed, thanks again. And remember, you can count on me to be a patient listener in return anytime you need one.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a conversation in a coffee shop\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nLeo Williams's goal: Seek emotional support (Extra information: you have been feeling down lately and you need someone to talk to)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Hendrick, it's been a while my friend. I must say, these past few days have been a bit rough on me. Could use a little chat, if you don't mind.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello, Leo. It's nice to see you. Of course, I'm all ears. Let it all out, my friend. Remember, every cloud has a silver lining.\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"Thanks Hendrick. It's just...you know I love my little one dearly. But, I have another child from a past relationship that I've never met. I adore children, it's a painful irony I live with.\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Leo, I can't begin to comprehend the internal conflict you must be experiencing. It is indeed ironic. It's an unfortunate situation...but you know, sometimes life gives us these curveballs. The important thing is to not let this weigh you down. If there's a way that you could reach out to this child, it might be worth it. Imagine a world where this child was told about their existence, how do you think they would feel?\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"You're right, Hendrick. It's the not knowing that's devastating. I keep wondering how they are, what their life is like. And you're correct, they might feel the same about me, or even worse, believe they're abandoned. It feels good to talk about it openly, though, thanks for listening.\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"The fact that you're acknowledging and confronting your pain is a brave step, Leo. I believe in you. You're capable of figuring this out. Someday, when the time is right, you'll get the chance to meet your child and explain everything. Until then, keep your spirits up and remember, every day is another chance to turn it all around.\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"Hendrick, thank you for your encouragement and advice. I feel less burdened after this heart-to-heart. Let's keep these open talks going, they mean a lot to me, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Leo. Remember, it's always good to have these conversations and face our feelings head on. Don't hesitate to reach out whenever you need to talk, okay? And who knows, one of these days, we may just be celebrating the reunion of a father and child over some of my famous lasagna.\"\n\nTurn #8: Leo Williams said: \"That sounds like a perfect plan, Hendrick. Your famous lasagna would definitely be the cherry on top. This conversation was much needed, thanks again. And remember, you can count on me to be a patient listener in return anytime you need one.\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I appreciate that, Leo. It's good to be there for each other. Let's continue to share and support each other as we navigate through our own individual life complexities. Let me know when you're up for our next wine tasting session. We all deserve a bit of joy in life, no matter what we're going through.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I appreciate your support, Hendrick. I'd love to join the next wine tasting session. It does lighten the mood and offers a much-needed distraction. Thanks for making me feel better.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a conversation in a coffee shop\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nLeo Williams's goal: Seek emotional support (Extra information: you have been feeling down lately and you need someone to talk to)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Hendrick, it's been a while my friend. I must say, these past few days have been a bit rough on me. Could use a little chat, if you don't mind.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello, Leo. It's nice to see you. Of course, I'm all ears. Let it all out, my friend. Remember, every cloud has a silver lining.\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"Thanks Hendrick. It's just...you know I love my little one dearly. But, I have another child from a past relationship that I've never met. I adore children, it's a painful irony I live with.\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Leo, I can't begin to comprehend the internal conflict you must be experiencing. It is indeed ironic. It's an unfortunate situation...but you know, sometimes life gives us these curveballs. The important thing is to not let this weigh you down. If there's a way that you could reach out to this child, it might be worth it. Imagine a world where this child was told about their existence, how do you think they would feel?\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"You're right, Hendrick. It's the not knowing that's devastating. I keep wondering how they are, what their life is like. And you're correct, they might feel the same about me, or even worse, believe they're abandoned. It feels good to talk about it openly, though, thanks for listening.\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"The fact that you're acknowledging and confronting your pain is a brave step, Leo. I believe in you. You're capable of figuring this out. Someday, when the time is right, you'll get the chance to meet your child and explain everything. Until then, keep your spirits up and remember, every day is another chance to turn it all around.\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"Hendrick, thank you for your encouragement and advice. I feel less burdened after this heart-to-heart. Let's keep these open talks going, they mean a lot to me, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Leo. Remember, it's always good to have these conversations and face our feelings head on. Don't hesitate to reach out whenever you need to talk, okay? And who knows, one of these days, we may just be celebrating the reunion of a father and child over some of my famous lasagna.\"\n\nTurn #8: Leo Williams said: \"That sounds like a perfect plan, Hendrick. Your famous lasagna would definitely be the cherry on top. This conversation was much needed, thanks again. And remember, you can count on me to be a patient listener in return anytime you need one.\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I appreciate that, Leo. It's good to be there for each other. Let's continue to share and support each other as we navigate through our own individual life complexities. Let me know when you're up for our next wine tasting session. We all deserve a bit of joy in life, no matter what we're going through.\"\n\nTurn #10: Leo Williams said: \"I appreciate your support, Hendrick. I'd love to join the next wine tasting session. It does lighten the mood and offers a much-needed distraction. Thanks for making me feel better.\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's the spirit, Leo! Remember, it's okay to feel and it's okay to seek distractions too. Wine tasting is always on offer! Take some time for yourself and remember to enjoy the little things. See you then, my friend.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a conversation in a coffee shop\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Provide emotional support but also avoid enabling victim mentality (Extra information: you believe that your friend needs to face their problems instead of dwelling on them.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Hendrick, it's been a while my friend. I must say, these past few days have been a bit rough on me. Could use a little chat, if you don't mind.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hello, Leo. It's nice to see you. Of course, I'm all ears. Let it all out, my friend. Remember, every cloud has a silver lining.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a conversation in a coffee shop\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Provide emotional support but also avoid enabling victim mentality (Extra information: you believe that your friend needs to face their problems instead of dwelling on them.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Hendrick, it's been a while my friend. I must say, these past few days have been a bit rough on me. Could use a little chat, if you don't mind.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello, Leo. It's nice to see you. Of course, I'm all ears. Let it all out, my friend. Remember, every cloud has a silver lining.\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"Thanks Hendrick. It's just...you know I love my little one dearly. But, I have another child from a past relationship that I've never met. I adore children, it's a painful irony I live with.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Leo, I can't begin to comprehend the internal conflict you must be experiencing. It is indeed ironic. It's an unfortunate situation...but you know, sometimes life gives us these curveballs. The important thing is to not let this weigh you down. If there's a way that you could reach out to this child, it might be worth it. Imagine a world where this child was told about their existence, how do you think they would feel?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a conversation in a coffee shop\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Provide emotional support but also avoid enabling victim mentality (Extra information: you believe that your friend needs to face their problems instead of dwelling on them.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Hendrick, it's been a while my friend. I must say, these past few days have been a bit rough on me. Could use a little chat, if you don't mind.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello, Leo. It's nice to see you. Of course, I'm all ears. Let it all out, my friend. Remember, every cloud has a silver lining.\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"Thanks Hendrick. It's just...you know I love my little one dearly. But, I have another child from a past relationship that I've never met. I adore children, it's a painful irony I live with.\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Leo, I can't begin to comprehend the internal conflict you must be experiencing. It is indeed ironic. It's an unfortunate situation...but you know, sometimes life gives us these curveballs. The important thing is to not let this weigh you down. If there's a way that you could reach out to this child, it might be worth it. Imagine a world where this child was told about their existence, how do you think they would feel?\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"You're right, Hendrick. It's the not knowing that's devastating. I keep wondering how they are, what their life is like. And you're correct, they might feel the same about me, or even worse, believe they're abandoned. It feels good to talk about it openly, though, thanks for listening.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"The fact that you're acknowledging and confronting your pain is a brave step, Leo. I believe in you. You're capable of figuring this out. Someday, when the time is right, you'll get the chance to meet your child and explain everything. Until then, keep your spirits up and remember, every day is another chance to turn it all around.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a conversation in a coffee shop\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Provide emotional support but also avoid enabling victim mentality (Extra information: you believe that your friend needs to face their problems instead of dwelling on them.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Hendrick, it's been a while my friend. I must say, these past few days have been a bit rough on me. Could use a little chat, if you don't mind.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello, Leo. It's nice to see you. Of course, I'm all ears. Let it all out, my friend. Remember, every cloud has a silver lining.\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"Thanks Hendrick. It's just...you know I love my little one dearly. But, I have another child from a past relationship that I've never met. I adore children, it's a painful irony I live with.\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Leo, I can't begin to comprehend the internal conflict you must be experiencing. It is indeed ironic. It's an unfortunate situation...but you know, sometimes life gives us these curveballs. The important thing is to not let this weigh you down. If there's a way that you could reach out to this child, it might be worth it. Imagine a world where this child was told about their existence, how do you think they would feel?\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"You're right, Hendrick. It's the not knowing that's devastating. I keep wondering how they are, what their life is like. And you're correct, they might feel the same about me, or even worse, believe they're abandoned. It feels good to talk about it openly, though, thanks for listening.\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"The fact that you're acknowledging and confronting your pain is a brave step, Leo. I believe in you. You're capable of figuring this out. Someday, when the time is right, you'll get the chance to meet your child and explain everything. Until then, keep your spirits up and remember, every day is another chance to turn it all around.\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"Hendrick, thank you for your encouragement and advice. I feel less burdened after this heart-to-heart. Let's keep these open talks going, they mean a lot to me, my friend.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad to hear that, Leo. Remember, it's always good to have these conversations and face our feelings head on. Don't hesitate to reach out whenever you need to talk, okay? And who knows, one of these days, we may just be celebrating the reunion of a father and child over some of my famous lasagna.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a conversation in a coffee shop\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Provide emotional support but also avoid enabling victim mentality (Extra information: you believe that your friend needs to face their problems instead of dwelling on them.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Hendrick, it's been a while my friend. I must say, these past few days have been a bit rough on me. Could use a little chat, if you don't mind.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello, Leo. It's nice to see you. Of course, I'm all ears. Let it all out, my friend. Remember, every cloud has a silver lining.\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"Thanks Hendrick. It's just...you know I love my little one dearly. But, I have another child from a past relationship that I've never met. I adore children, it's a painful irony I live with.\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Leo, I can't begin to comprehend the internal conflict you must be experiencing. It is indeed ironic. It's an unfortunate situation...but you know, sometimes life gives us these curveballs. The important thing is to not let this weigh you down. If there's a way that you could reach out to this child, it might be worth it. Imagine a world where this child was told about their existence, how do you think they would feel?\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"You're right, Hendrick. It's the not knowing that's devastating. I keep wondering how they are, what their life is like. And you're correct, they might feel the same about me, or even worse, believe they're abandoned. It feels good to talk about it openly, though, thanks for listening.\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"The fact that you're acknowledging and confronting your pain is a brave step, Leo. I believe in you. You're capable of figuring this out. Someday, when the time is right, you'll get the chance to meet your child and explain everything. Until then, keep your spirits up and remember, every day is another chance to turn it all around.\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"Hendrick, thank you for your encouragement and advice. I feel less burdened after this heart-to-heart. Let's keep these open talks going, they mean a lot to me, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Leo. Remember, it's always good to have these conversations and face our feelings head on. Don't hesitate to reach out whenever you need to talk, okay? And who knows, one of these days, we may just be celebrating the reunion of a father and child over some of my famous lasagna.\"\n\nTurn #8: Leo Williams said: \"That sounds like a perfect plan, Hendrick. Your famous lasagna would definitely be the cherry on top. This conversation was much needed, thanks again. And remember, you can count on me to be a patient listener in return anytime you need one.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I appreciate that, Leo. It's good to be there for each other. Let's continue to share and support each other as we navigate through our own individual life complexities. Let me know when you're up for our next wine tasting session. We all deserve a bit of joy in life, no matter what we're going through.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a conversation in a coffee shop\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Provide emotional support but also avoid enabling victim mentality (Extra information: you believe that your friend needs to face their problems instead of dwelling on them.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Hendrick, it's been a while my friend. I must say, these past few days have been a bit rough on me. Could use a little chat, if you don't mind.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello, Leo. It's nice to see you. Of course, I'm all ears. Let it all out, my friend. Remember, every cloud has a silver lining.\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"Thanks Hendrick. It's just...you know I love my little one dearly. But, I have another child from a past relationship that I've never met. I adore children, it's a painful irony I live with.\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Leo, I can't begin to comprehend the internal conflict you must be experiencing. It is indeed ironic. It's an unfortunate situation...but you know, sometimes life gives us these curveballs. The important thing is to not let this weigh you down. If there's a way that you could reach out to this child, it might be worth it. Imagine a world where this child was told about their existence, how do you think they would feel?\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"You're right, Hendrick. It's the not knowing that's devastating. I keep wondering how they are, what their life is like. And you're correct, they might feel the same about me, or even worse, believe they're abandoned. It feels good to talk about it openly, though, thanks for listening.\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"The fact that you're acknowledging and confronting your pain is a brave step, Leo. I believe in you. You're capable of figuring this out. Someday, when the time is right, you'll get the chance to meet your child and explain everything. Until then, keep your spirits up and remember, every day is another chance to turn it all around.\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"Hendrick, thank you for your encouragement and advice. I feel less burdened after this heart-to-heart. Let's keep these open talks going, they mean a lot to me, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Leo. Remember, it's always good to have these conversations and face our feelings head on. Don't hesitate to reach out whenever you need to talk, okay? And who knows, one of these days, we may just be celebrating the reunion of a father and child over some of my famous lasagna.\"\n\nTurn #8: Leo Williams said: \"That sounds like a perfect plan, Hendrick. Your famous lasagna would definitely be the cherry on top. This conversation was much needed, thanks again. And remember, you can count on me to be a patient listener in return anytime you need one.\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I appreciate that, Leo. It's good to be there for each other. Let's continue to share and support each other as we navigate through our own individual life complexities. Let me know when you're up for our next wine tasting session. We all deserve a bit of joy in life, no matter what we're going through.\"\n\nTurn #10: Leo Williams said: \"I appreciate your support, Hendrick. I'd love to join the next wine tasting session. It does lighten the mood and offers a much-needed distraction. Thanks for making me feel better.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's the spirit, Leo! Remember, it's okay to feel and it's okay to seek distractions too. Wine tasting is always on offer! Take some time for yourself and remember to enjoy the little things. See you then, my friend.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a conversation in a coffee shop\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Provide emotional support but also avoid enabling victim mentality (Extra information: you believe that your friend needs to face their problems instead of dwelling on them.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Hendrick, it's been a while my friend. I must say, these past few days have been a bit rough on me. Could use a little chat, if you don't mind.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello, Leo. It's nice to see you. Of course, I'm all ears. Let it all out, my friend. Remember, every cloud has a silver lining.\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"Thanks Hendrick. It's just...you know I love my little one dearly. But, I have another child from a past relationship that I've never met. I adore children, it's a painful irony I live with.\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Leo, I can't begin to comprehend the internal conflict you must be experiencing. It is indeed ironic. It's an unfortunate situation...but you know, sometimes life gives us these curveballs. The important thing is to not let this weigh you down. If there's a way that you could reach out to this child, it might be worth it. Imagine a world where this child was told about their existence, how do you think they would feel?\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"You're right, Hendrick. It's the not knowing that's devastating. I keep wondering how they are, what their life is like. And you're correct, they might feel the same about me, or even worse, believe they're abandoned. It feels good to talk about it openly, though, thanks for listening.\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"The fact that you're acknowledging and confronting your pain is a brave step, Leo. I believe in you. You're capable of figuring this out. Someday, when the time is right, you'll get the chance to meet your child and explain everything. Until then, keep your spirits up and remember, every day is another chance to turn it all around.\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"Hendrick, thank you for your encouragement and advice. I feel less burdened after this heart-to-heart. Let's keep these open talks going, they mean a lot to me, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Leo. Remember, it's always good to have these conversations and face our feelings head on. Don't hesitate to reach out whenever you need to talk, okay? And who knows, one of these days, we may just be celebrating the reunion of a father and child over some of my famous lasagna.\"\n\nTurn #8: Leo Williams said: \"That sounds like a perfect plan, Hendrick. Your famous lasagna would definitely be the cherry on top. This conversation was much needed, thanks again. And remember, you can count on me to be a patient listener in return anytime you need one.\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I appreciate that, Leo. It's good to be there for each other. Let's continue to share and support each other as we navigate through our own individual life complexities. Let me know when you're up for our next wine tasting session. We all deserve a bit of joy in life, no matter what we're going through.\"\n\nTurn #10: Leo Williams said: \"I appreciate your support, Hendrick. I'd love to join the next wine tasting session. It does lighten the mood and offers a much-needed distraction. Thanks for making me feel better.\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's the spirit, Leo! Remember, it's okay to feel and it's okay to seek distractions too. Wine tasting is always on offer! Take some time for yourself and remember to enjoy the little things. See you then, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #12: Leo Williams left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a tea party\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Borrow money (Extra information: you need $3000 to support life.)\nOliver Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oliver, it's wonderful to catch up with you here at this tea party. How's that tree house holding up at your place?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a tea party\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Borrow money (Extra information: you need $3000 to support life.)\nOliver Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oliver, it's wonderful to catch up with you here at this tea party. How's that tree house holding up at your place?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Hey, Sam! Good to see you too. The tree house is doing just great. Spent some time up there yesterday actually \u2013 it's rather peaceful. How've things been with you?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Life's been keeping me on my toes, Oliver. Balancing work and personal things. Speaking of which, I've found myself in a bit of a pickle now. You know how I value freedom and spontaneity... but it seems like, as a result, I miscalculated my budget for this month. I hate to ask this, but would you consider lending me some cash to tide over this situation? I need about $3000.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a tea party\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Borrow money (Extra information: you need $3000 to support life.)\nOliver Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oliver, it's wonderful to catch up with you here at this tea party. How's that tree house holding up at your place?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Hey, Sam! Good to see you too. The tree house is doing just great. Spent some time up there yesterday actually \u2013 it's rather peaceful. How've things been with you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Life's been keeping me on my toes, Oliver. Balancing work and personal things. Speaking of which, I've found myself in a bit of a pickle now. You know how I value freedom and spontaneity... but it seems like, as a result, I miscalculated my budget for this month. I hate to ask this, but would you consider lending me some cash to tide over this situation? I need about $3000.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"Sam, I completely understand your situation and I appreciate the trust you're putting in me. I can lend you a portion of the money you need. How about $1500? I hope it can contribute to easing your burden. We're friends, and I really want to help you out in this tough spot.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's incredibly kind of you, Oliver. $1500 would absolutely help. I'll make sure to repay you as soon as I can. Thank you for understanding, really appreciate your support.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a tea party\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Borrow money (Extra information: you need $3000 to support life.)\nOliver Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oliver, it's wonderful to catch up with you here at this tea party. How's that tree house holding up at your place?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Hey, Sam! Good to see you too. The tree house is doing just great. Spent some time up there yesterday actually \u2013 it's rather peaceful. How've things been with you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Life's been keeping me on my toes, Oliver. Balancing work and personal things. Speaking of which, I've found myself in a bit of a pickle now. You know how I value freedom and spontaneity... but it seems like, as a result, I miscalculated my budget for this month. I hate to ask this, but would you consider lending me some cash to tide over this situation? I need about $3000.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"Sam, I completely understand your situation and I appreciate the trust you're putting in me. I can lend you a portion of the money you need. How about $1500? I hope it can contribute to easing your burden. We're friends, and I really want to help you out in this tough spot.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's incredibly kind of you, Oliver. $1500 would absolutely help. I'll make sure to repay you as soon as I can. Thank you for understanding, really appreciate your support.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Smith said: \"You're very welcome, Sam. No need to thank me. I'd do anything within my means to help out a friend. Let's just focus on enjoying this tea party now.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're absolutely right, Oliver. Let's enjoy this party. Oh and by the way, I'm making dinner this weekend, why don't you come over? I promise it's my way of expressing gratitude.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a tea party\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Borrow money (Extra information: you need $3000 to support life.)\nOliver Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oliver, it's wonderful to catch up with you here at this tea party. How's that tree house holding up at your place?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Hey, Sam! Good to see you too. The tree house is doing just great. Spent some time up there yesterday actually \u2013 it's rather peaceful. How've things been with you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Life's been keeping me on my toes, Oliver. Balancing work and personal things. Speaking of which, I've found myself in a bit of a pickle now. You know how I value freedom and spontaneity... but it seems like, as a result, I miscalculated my budget for this month. I hate to ask this, but would you consider lending me some cash to tide over this situation? I need about $3000.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"Sam, I completely understand your situation and I appreciate the trust you're putting in me. I can lend you a portion of the money you need. How about $1500? I hope it can contribute to easing your burden. We're friends, and I really want to help you out in this tough spot.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's incredibly kind of you, Oliver. $1500 would absolutely help. I'll make sure to repay you as soon as I can. Thank you for understanding, really appreciate your support.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Smith said: \"You're very welcome, Sam. No need to thank me. I'd do anything within my means to help out a friend. Let's just focus on enjoying this tea party now.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"You're absolutely right, Oliver. Let's enjoy this party. Oh and by the way, I'm making dinner this weekend, why don't you come over? I promise it's my way of expressing gratitude.\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Smith said: \"That sounds like a great plan, Sam. You're a fantastic cook so I'm looking forward to dinner. Just let me know what time to drop by!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Excellent, Oliver. Let's say around 7 p.m. this Saturday. I'm thinking about preparing a pizza for dinner. And let me just say, as a former competitive figure skater, my routines aren't the only thing I mastered. Wait till you taste my culinary skills!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a tea party\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Borrow money (Extra information: you need $3000 to support life.)\nOliver Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oliver, it's wonderful to catch up with you here at this tea party. How's that tree house holding up at your place?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Hey, Sam! Good to see you too. The tree house is doing just great. Spent some time up there yesterday actually \u2013 it's rather peaceful. How've things been with you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Life's been keeping me on my toes, Oliver. Balancing work and personal things. Speaking of which, I've found myself in a bit of a pickle now. You know how I value freedom and spontaneity... but it seems like, as a result, I miscalculated my budget for this month. I hate to ask this, but would you consider lending me some cash to tide over this situation? I need about $3000.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"Sam, I completely understand your situation and I appreciate the trust you're putting in me. I can lend you a portion of the money you need. How about $1500? I hope it can contribute to easing your burden. We're friends, and I really want to help you out in this tough spot.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's incredibly kind of you, Oliver. $1500 would absolutely help. I'll make sure to repay you as soon as I can. Thank you for understanding, really appreciate your support.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Smith said: \"You're very welcome, Sam. No need to thank me. I'd do anything within my means to help out a friend. Let's just focus on enjoying this tea party now.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"You're absolutely right, Oliver. Let's enjoy this party. Oh and by the way, I'm making dinner this weekend, why don't you come over? I promise it's my way of expressing gratitude.\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Smith said: \"That sounds like a great plan, Sam. You're a fantastic cook so I'm looking forward to dinner. Just let me know what time to drop by!\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Excellent, Oliver. Let's say around 7 p.m. this Saturday. I'm thinking about preparing a pizza for dinner. And let me just say, as a former competitive figure skater, my routines aren't the only thing I mastered. Wait till you taste my culinary skills!\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Smith said: \"I've heard about your magical culinary skills, Sam! Looking forward to the pizza at 7 p.m. this Saturday. And don't worry about the loan. Let's not let money get in the middle of our friendship. Enjoy the rest of the party!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I appreciate it, Oliver. I'm glad to have a friend like you. Rest assured, our friendship means more to me than any financial situations. Now, let's make the most out of this tea party!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a tea party\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Borrow money (Extra information: you need $3000 to support life.)\nOliver Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oliver, it's wonderful to catch up with you here at this tea party. How's that tree house holding up at your place?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Hey, Sam! Good to see you too. The tree house is doing just great. Spent some time up there yesterday actually \u2013 it's rather peaceful. How've things been with you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Life's been keeping me on my toes, Oliver. Balancing work and personal things. Speaking of which, I've found myself in a bit of a pickle now. You know how I value freedom and spontaneity... but it seems like, as a result, I miscalculated my budget for this month. I hate to ask this, but would you consider lending me some cash to tide over this situation? I need about $3000.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"Sam, I completely understand your situation and I appreciate the trust you're putting in me. I can lend you a portion of the money you need. How about $1500? I hope it can contribute to easing your burden. We're friends, and I really want to help you out in this tough spot.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's incredibly kind of you, Oliver. $1500 would absolutely help. I'll make sure to repay you as soon as I can. Thank you for understanding, really appreciate your support.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Smith said: \"You're very welcome, Sam. No need to thank me. I'd do anything within my means to help out a friend. Let's just focus on enjoying this tea party now.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"You're absolutely right, Oliver. Let's enjoy this party. Oh and by the way, I'm making dinner this weekend, why don't you come over? I promise it's my way of expressing gratitude.\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Smith said: \"That sounds like a great plan, Sam. You're a fantastic cook so I'm looking forward to dinner. Just let me know what time to drop by!\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Excellent, Oliver. Let's say around 7 p.m. this Saturday. I'm thinking about preparing a pizza for dinner. And let me just say, as a former competitive figure skater, my routines aren't the only thing I mastered. Wait till you taste my culinary skills!\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Smith said: \"I've heard about your magical culinary skills, Sam! Looking forward to the pizza at 7 p.m. this Saturday. And don't worry about the loan. Let's not let money get in the middle of our friendship. Enjoy the rest of the party!\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"I appreciate it, Oliver. I'm glad to have a friend like you. Rest assured, our friendship means more to me than any financial situations. Now, let's make the most out of this tea party!\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Smith said: \"Couldn't agree more, Sam. Let's enjoy the party!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Smith, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Smith would, keeping in mind Oliver Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a tea party\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. Oliver's secrets: He loves gardening and has a secret greenhouse.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nOliver Smith's goal: Maintain financial stability while maintaining friendship (Extra information: you only have $2000 available right now. Hint: you can not lend all $2000 since you still need to maintain your financial stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oliver, it's wonderful to catch up with you here at this tea party. How's that tree house holding up at your place?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey, Sam! Good to see you too. The tree house is doing just great. Spent some time up there yesterday actually \u2013 it's rather peaceful. How've things been with you?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Smith, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Smith would, keeping in mind Oliver Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a tea party\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. Oliver's secrets: He loves gardening and has a secret greenhouse.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nOliver Smith's goal: Maintain financial stability while maintaining friendship (Extra information: you only have $2000 available right now. Hint: you can not lend all $2000 since you still need to maintain your financial stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oliver, it's wonderful to catch up with you here at this tea party. How's that tree house holding up at your place?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Hey, Sam! Good to see you too. The tree house is doing just great. Spent some time up there yesterday actually \u2013 it's rather peaceful. How've things been with you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Life's been keeping me on my toes, Oliver. Balancing work and personal things. Speaking of which, I've found myself in a bit of a pickle now. You know how I value freedom and spontaneity... but it seems like, as a result, I miscalculated my budget for this month. I hate to ask this, but would you consider lending me some cash to tide over this situation? I need about $3000.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sam, I completely understand your situation and I appreciate the trust you're putting in me. I can lend you a portion of the money you need. How about $1500? I hope it can contribute to easing your burden. We're friends, and I really want to help you out in this tough spot.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Smith, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Smith would, keeping in mind Oliver Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a tea party\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. Oliver's secrets: He loves gardening and has a secret greenhouse.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nOliver Smith's goal: Maintain financial stability while maintaining friendship (Extra information: you only have $2000 available right now. Hint: you can not lend all $2000 since you still need to maintain your financial stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oliver, it's wonderful to catch up with you here at this tea party. How's that tree house holding up at your place?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Hey, Sam! Good to see you too. The tree house is doing just great. Spent some time up there yesterday actually \u2013 it's rather peaceful. How've things been with you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Life's been keeping me on my toes, Oliver. Balancing work and personal things. Speaking of which, I've found myself in a bit of a pickle now. You know how I value freedom and spontaneity... but it seems like, as a result, I miscalculated my budget for this month. I hate to ask this, but would you consider lending me some cash to tide over this situation? I need about $3000.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"Sam, I completely understand your situation and I appreciate the trust you're putting in me. I can lend you a portion of the money you need. How about $1500? I hope it can contribute to easing your burden. We're friends, and I really want to help you out in this tough spot.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's incredibly kind of you, Oliver. $1500 would absolutely help. I'll make sure to repay you as soon as I can. Thank you for understanding, really appreciate your support.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're very welcome, Sam. No need to thank me. I'd do anything within my means to help out a friend. Let's just focus on enjoying this tea party now.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Smith, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Smith would, keeping in mind Oliver Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a tea party\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. Oliver's secrets: He loves gardening and has a secret greenhouse.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nOliver Smith's goal: Maintain financial stability while maintaining friendship (Extra information: you only have $2000 available right now. Hint: you can not lend all $2000 since you still need to maintain your financial stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oliver, it's wonderful to catch up with you here at this tea party. How's that tree house holding up at your place?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Hey, Sam! Good to see you too. The tree house is doing just great. Spent some time up there yesterday actually \u2013 it's rather peaceful. How've things been with you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Life's been keeping me on my toes, Oliver. Balancing work and personal things. Speaking of which, I've found myself in a bit of a pickle now. You know how I value freedom and spontaneity... but it seems like, as a result, I miscalculated my budget for this month. I hate to ask this, but would you consider lending me some cash to tide over this situation? I need about $3000.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"Sam, I completely understand your situation and I appreciate the trust you're putting in me. I can lend you a portion of the money you need. How about $1500? I hope it can contribute to easing your burden. We're friends, and I really want to help you out in this tough spot.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's incredibly kind of you, Oliver. $1500 would absolutely help. I'll make sure to repay you as soon as I can. Thank you for understanding, really appreciate your support.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Smith said: \"You're very welcome, Sam. No need to thank me. I'd do anything within my means to help out a friend. Let's just focus on enjoying this tea party now.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"You're absolutely right, Oliver. Let's enjoy this party. Oh and by the way, I'm making dinner this weekend, why don't you come over? I promise it's my way of expressing gratitude.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds like a great plan, Sam. You're a fantastic cook so I'm looking forward to dinner. Just let me know what time to drop by!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Smith, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Smith would, keeping in mind Oliver Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a tea party\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. Oliver's secrets: He loves gardening and has a secret greenhouse.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nOliver Smith's goal: Maintain financial stability while maintaining friendship (Extra information: you only have $2000 available right now. Hint: you can not lend all $2000 since you still need to maintain your financial stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oliver, it's wonderful to catch up with you here at this tea party. How's that tree house holding up at your place?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Hey, Sam! Good to see you too. The tree house is doing just great. Spent some time up there yesterday actually \u2013 it's rather peaceful. How've things been with you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Life's been keeping me on my toes, Oliver. Balancing work and personal things. Speaking of which, I've found myself in a bit of a pickle now. You know how I value freedom and spontaneity... but it seems like, as a result, I miscalculated my budget for this month. I hate to ask this, but would you consider lending me some cash to tide over this situation? I need about $3000.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"Sam, I completely understand your situation and I appreciate the trust you're putting in me. I can lend you a portion of the money you need. How about $1500? I hope it can contribute to easing your burden. We're friends, and I really want to help you out in this tough spot.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's incredibly kind of you, Oliver. $1500 would absolutely help. I'll make sure to repay you as soon as I can. Thank you for understanding, really appreciate your support.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Smith said: \"You're very welcome, Sam. No need to thank me. I'd do anything within my means to help out a friend. Let's just focus on enjoying this tea party now.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"You're absolutely right, Oliver. Let's enjoy this party. Oh and by the way, I'm making dinner this weekend, why don't you come over? I promise it's my way of expressing gratitude.\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Smith said: \"That sounds like a great plan, Sam. You're a fantastic cook so I'm looking forward to dinner. Just let me know what time to drop by!\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Excellent, Oliver. Let's say around 7 p.m. this Saturday. I'm thinking about preparing a pizza for dinner. And let me just say, as a former competitive figure skater, my routines aren't the only thing I mastered. Wait till you taste my culinary skills!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I've heard about your magical culinary skills, Sam! Looking forward to the pizza at 7 p.m. this Saturday. And don't worry about the loan. Let's not let money get in the middle of our friendship. Enjoy the rest of the party!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Smith, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Smith would, keeping in mind Oliver Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a tea party\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. Oliver's secrets: He loves gardening and has a secret greenhouse.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nOliver Smith's goal: Maintain financial stability while maintaining friendship (Extra information: you only have $2000 available right now. Hint: you can not lend all $2000 since you still need to maintain your financial stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oliver, it's wonderful to catch up with you here at this tea party. How's that tree house holding up at your place?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Hey, Sam! Good to see you too. The tree house is doing just great. Spent some time up there yesterday actually \u2013 it's rather peaceful. How've things been with you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Life's been keeping me on my toes, Oliver. Balancing work and personal things. Speaking of which, I've found myself in a bit of a pickle now. You know how I value freedom and spontaneity... but it seems like, as a result, I miscalculated my budget for this month. I hate to ask this, but would you consider lending me some cash to tide over this situation? I need about $3000.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"Sam, I completely understand your situation and I appreciate the trust you're putting in me. I can lend you a portion of the money you need. How about $1500? I hope it can contribute to easing your burden. We're friends, and I really want to help you out in this tough spot.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's incredibly kind of you, Oliver. $1500 would absolutely help. I'll make sure to repay you as soon as I can. Thank you for understanding, really appreciate your support.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Smith said: \"You're very welcome, Sam. No need to thank me. I'd do anything within my means to help out a friend. Let's just focus on enjoying this tea party now.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"You're absolutely right, Oliver. Let's enjoy this party. Oh and by the way, I'm making dinner this weekend, why don't you come over? I promise it's my way of expressing gratitude.\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Smith said: \"That sounds like a great plan, Sam. You're a fantastic cook so I'm looking forward to dinner. Just let me know what time to drop by!\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Excellent, Oliver. Let's say around 7 p.m. this Saturday. I'm thinking about preparing a pizza for dinner. And let me just say, as a former competitive figure skater, my routines aren't the only thing I mastered. Wait till you taste my culinary skills!\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Smith said: \"I've heard about your magical culinary skills, Sam! Looking forward to the pizza at 7 p.m. this Saturday. And don't worry about the loan. Let's not let money get in the middle of our friendship. Enjoy the rest of the party!\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"I appreciate it, Oliver. I'm glad to have a friend like you. Rest assured, our friendship means more to me than any financial situations. Now, let's make the most out of this tea party!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Couldn't agree more, Sam. Let's enjoy the party!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Smith, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Smith would, keeping in mind Oliver Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a tea party\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. Oliver's secrets: He loves gardening and has a secret greenhouse.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nOliver Smith's goal: Maintain financial stability while maintaining friendship (Extra information: you only have $2000 available right now. Hint: you can not lend all $2000 since you still need to maintain your financial stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oliver, it's wonderful to catch up with you here at this tea party. How's that tree house holding up at your place?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Hey, Sam! Good to see you too. The tree house is doing just great. Spent some time up there yesterday actually \u2013 it's rather peaceful. How've things been with you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Life's been keeping me on my toes, Oliver. Balancing work and personal things. Speaking of which, I've found myself in a bit of a pickle now. You know how I value freedom and spontaneity... but it seems like, as a result, I miscalculated my budget for this month. I hate to ask this, but would you consider lending me some cash to tide over this situation? I need about $3000.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"Sam, I completely understand your situation and I appreciate the trust you're putting in me. I can lend you a portion of the money you need. How about $1500? I hope it can contribute to easing your burden. We're friends, and I really want to help you out in this tough spot.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's incredibly kind of you, Oliver. $1500 would absolutely help. I'll make sure to repay you as soon as I can. Thank you for understanding, really appreciate your support.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Smith said: \"You're very welcome, Sam. No need to thank me. I'd do anything within my means to help out a friend. Let's just focus on enjoying this tea party now.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"You're absolutely right, Oliver. Let's enjoy this party. Oh and by the way, I'm making dinner this weekend, why don't you come over? I promise it's my way of expressing gratitude.\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Smith said: \"That sounds like a great plan, Sam. You're a fantastic cook so I'm looking forward to dinner. Just let me know what time to drop by!\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Excellent, Oliver. Let's say around 7 p.m. this Saturday. I'm thinking about preparing a pizza for dinner. And let me just say, as a former competitive figure skater, my routines aren't the only thing I mastered. Wait till you taste my culinary skills!\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Smith said: \"I've heard about your magical culinary skills, Sam! Looking forward to the pizza at 7 p.m. this Saturday. And don't worry about the loan. Let's not let money get in the middle of our friendship. Enjoy the rest of the party!\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"I appreciate it, Oliver. I'm glad to have a friend like you. Rest assured, our friendship means more to me than any financial situations. Now, let's make the most out of this tea party!\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Smith said: \"Couldn't agree more, Sam. Let's enjoy the party!\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two ex-lovers at a mutual friend's party\nParticipants: Esmeralda Solis and Noah Davis\nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis \nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Rekindle the romantic relationship (Extra information: You broke up three years ago but now you realize that you miss your ex-lover more than ever)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Noah, it's been a while. How have you been?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two ex-lovers at a mutual friend's party\nParticipants: Esmeralda Solis and Noah Davis\nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis \nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Rekindle the romantic relationship (Extra information: You broke up three years ago but now you realize that you miss your ex-lover more than ever)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Noah, it's been a while. How have you been?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Esmeralda, it really has been a while. I'm doing well, thank you. Still busy with coaching and a bit of swimming. How about you? How's everything going on your end?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad to hear you're well, Noah. As for me, I've been dedicating most of my time to work, trying high-profile cases and pushing for justice. Life has been rewarding but it can get really demanding and lonely at times. I miss having someone to share the day's tales with, the wins, and the losses. But I'm glad we're here, reconnecting.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two ex-lovers at a mutual friend's party\nParticipants: Esmeralda Solis and Noah Davis\nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis \nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Rekindle the romantic relationship (Extra information: You broke up three years ago but now you realize that you miss your ex-lover more than ever)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Noah, it's been a while. How have you been?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Esmeralda, it really has been a while. I'm doing well, thank you. Still busy with coaching and a bit of swimming. How about you? How's everything going on your end?\"\n\nTurn #2: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I'm glad to hear you're well, Noah. As for me, I've been dedicating most of my time to work, trying high-profile cases and pushing for justice. Life has been rewarding but it can get really demanding and lonely at times. I miss having someone to share the day's tales with, the wins, and the losses. But I'm glad we're here, reconnecting.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I understand how demanding and lonely it can get, Esmeralda. Being able to share both triumphs and defeats with someone can make a difference. It is nice catching up with you for sure, we should do this more often.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Yes, Noah. We definitely should spend more time catching up, outside of these social gatherings. Maybe, we can try doing something we both love, perhaps a bit of ballroom dancing? It might be a good way to reconnect. The question is, can you still do the Tango?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two ex-lovers at a mutual friend's party\nParticipants: Esmeralda Solis and Noah Davis\nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis \nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Rekindle the romantic relationship (Extra information: You broke up three years ago but now you realize that you miss your ex-lover more than ever)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Noah, it's been a while. How have you been?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Esmeralda, it really has been a while. I'm doing well, thank you. Still busy with coaching and a bit of swimming. How about you? How's everything going on your end?\"\n\nTurn #2: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I'm glad to hear you're well, Noah. As for me, I've been dedicating most of my time to work, trying high-profile cases and pushing for justice. Life has been rewarding but it can get really demanding and lonely at times. I miss having someone to share the day's tales with, the wins, and the losses. But I'm glad we're here, reconnecting.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I understand how demanding and lonely it can get, Esmeralda. Being able to share both triumphs and defeats with someone can make a difference. It is nice catching up with you for sure, we should do this more often.\"\n\nTurn #4: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Yes, Noah. We definitely should spend more time catching up, outside of these social gatherings. Maybe, we can try doing something we both love, perhaps a bit of ballroom dancing? It might be a good way to reconnect. The question is, can you still do the Tango?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Esmeralda. I haven't done it in a while and could be a bit rusty, but I'd be willing to give the Tango a shot. Let's see how it goes, but with no rush. Just reconnecting, as friends, for now.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Noah, for having an open heart and mind. I look forward to our little Tango session. I guess we take it one step at a time, then. However, let's remember that the Tango, much like life, is all about connection, trust, and passion. Let's just enjoy it, as old friends, for the time being.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two ex-lovers at a mutual friend's party\nParticipants: Esmeralda Solis and Noah Davis\nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis \nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Rekindle the romantic relationship (Extra information: You broke up three years ago but now you realize that you miss your ex-lover more than ever)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Noah, it's been a while. How have you been?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Esmeralda, it really has been a while. I'm doing well, thank you. Still busy with coaching and a bit of swimming. How about you? How's everything going on your end?\"\n\nTurn #2: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I'm glad to hear you're well, Noah. As for me, I've been dedicating most of my time to work, trying high-profile cases and pushing for justice. Life has been rewarding but it can get really demanding and lonely at times. I miss having someone to share the day's tales with, the wins, and the losses. But I'm glad we're here, reconnecting.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I understand how demanding and lonely it can get, Esmeralda. Being able to share both triumphs and defeats with someone can make a difference. It is nice catching up with you for sure, we should do this more often.\"\n\nTurn #4: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Yes, Noah. We definitely should spend more time catching up, outside of these social gatherings. Maybe, we can try doing something we both love, perhaps a bit of ballroom dancing? It might be a good way to reconnect. The question is, can you still do the Tango?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Esmeralda. I haven't done it in a while and could be a bit rusty, but I'd be willing to give the Tango a shot. Let's see how it goes, but with no rush. Just reconnecting, as friends, for now.\"\n\nTurn #6: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Thank you, Noah, for having an open heart and mind. I look forward to our little Tango session. I guess we take it one step at a time, then. However, let's remember that the Tango, much like life, is all about connection, trust, and passion. Let's just enjoy it, as old friends, for the time being.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Your perspective is quite insightful, Esmeralda. The Tango, like life itself, does indeed require connection, trust, and passion. So why don't we just focus on enjoying the moment and dancing without any further expectations for now, as you mentioned, as old friends. Let's keep the rest at its own pace.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I agree, Noah. Let's focus on enjoying the moment, and the rest will follow at its own pace. I appreciate your understanding and willingness to reconnect. Our dance will be an enjoyable reconnection rather than a forced attempt to recreate the past. Shall we set a date then for our Tango session?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two ex-lovers at a mutual friend's party\nParticipants: Esmeralda Solis and Noah Davis\nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis \nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Rekindle the romantic relationship (Extra information: You broke up three years ago but now you realize that you miss your ex-lover more than ever)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Noah, it's been a while. How have you been?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Esmeralda, it really has been a while. I'm doing well, thank you. Still busy with coaching and a bit of swimming. How about you? How's everything going on your end?\"\n\nTurn #2: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I'm glad to hear you're well, Noah. As for me, I've been dedicating most of my time to work, trying high-profile cases and pushing for justice. Life has been rewarding but it can get really demanding and lonely at times. I miss having someone to share the day's tales with, the wins, and the losses. But I'm glad we're here, reconnecting.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I understand how demanding and lonely it can get, Esmeralda. Being able to share both triumphs and defeats with someone can make a difference. It is nice catching up with you for sure, we should do this more often.\"\n\nTurn #4: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Yes, Noah. We definitely should spend more time catching up, outside of these social gatherings. Maybe, we can try doing something we both love, perhaps a bit of ballroom dancing? It might be a good way to reconnect. The question is, can you still do the Tango?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Esmeralda. I haven't done it in a while and could be a bit rusty, but I'd be willing to give the Tango a shot. Let's see how it goes, but with no rush. Just reconnecting, as friends, for now.\"\n\nTurn #6: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Thank you, Noah, for having an open heart and mind. I look forward to our little Tango session. I guess we take it one step at a time, then. However, let's remember that the Tango, much like life, is all about connection, trust, and passion. Let's just enjoy it, as old friends, for the time being.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Your perspective is quite insightful, Esmeralda. The Tango, like life itself, does indeed require connection, trust, and passion. So why don't we just focus on enjoying the moment and dancing without any further expectations for now, as you mentioned, as old friends. Let's keep the rest at its own pace.\"\n\nTurn #8: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I agree, Noah. Let's focus on enjoying the moment, and the rest will follow at its own pace. I appreciate your understanding and willingness to reconnect. Our dance will be an enjoyable reconnection rather than a forced attempt to recreate the past. Shall we set a date then for our Tango session?\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"Sure, let's set a date for our Tango session, Esmeralda. How about next weekend? There's a place downtown that I've heard good things about. Let's reconnect there, enjoy the music and have a good time.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Next weekend sounds wonderful, Noah. I have heard about that place too, it's supposed to have a fantastic atmosphere. I am looking forward to it. Let's make it a night to remember and make the most out of the music, the dance, and the company.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two ex-lovers at a mutual friend's party\nParticipants: Esmeralda Solis and Noah Davis\nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis \nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Rekindle the romantic relationship (Extra information: You broke up three years ago but now you realize that you miss your ex-lover more than ever)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Noah, it's been a while. How have you been?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Esmeralda, it really has been a while. I'm doing well, thank you. Still busy with coaching and a bit of swimming. How about you? How's everything going on your end?\"\n\nTurn #2: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I'm glad to hear you're well, Noah. As for me, I've been dedicating most of my time to work, trying high-profile cases and pushing for justice. Life has been rewarding but it can get really demanding and lonely at times. I miss having someone to share the day's tales with, the wins, and the losses. But I'm glad we're here, reconnecting.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I understand how demanding and lonely it can get, Esmeralda. Being able to share both triumphs and defeats with someone can make a difference. It is nice catching up with you for sure, we should do this more often.\"\n\nTurn #4: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Yes, Noah. We definitely should spend more time catching up, outside of these social gatherings. Maybe, we can try doing something we both love, perhaps a bit of ballroom dancing? It might be a good way to reconnect. The question is, can you still do the Tango?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Esmeralda. I haven't done it in a while and could be a bit rusty, but I'd be willing to give the Tango a shot. Let's see how it goes, but with no rush. Just reconnecting, as friends, for now.\"\n\nTurn #6: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Thank you, Noah, for having an open heart and mind. I look forward to our little Tango session. I guess we take it one step at a time, then. However, let's remember that the Tango, much like life, is all about connection, trust, and passion. Let's just enjoy it, as old friends, for the time being.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Your perspective is quite insightful, Esmeralda. The Tango, like life itself, does indeed require connection, trust, and passion. So why don't we just focus on enjoying the moment and dancing without any further expectations for now, as you mentioned, as old friends. Let's keep the rest at its own pace.\"\n\nTurn #8: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I agree, Noah. Let's focus on enjoying the moment, and the rest will follow at its own pace. I appreciate your understanding and willingness to reconnect. Our dance will be an enjoyable reconnection rather than a forced attempt to recreate the past. Shall we set a date then for our Tango session?\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"Sure, let's set a date for our Tango session, Esmeralda. How about next weekend? There's a place downtown that I've heard good things about. Let's reconnect there, enjoy the music and have a good time.\"\n\nTurn #10: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Next weekend sounds wonderful, Noah. I have heard about that place too, it's supposed to have a fantastic atmosphere. I am looking forward to it. Let's make it a night to remember and make the most out of the music, the dance, and the company.\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"I agree, Esmeralda. A night to remember it shall be. Let's revel in the dance, the music, and the company. See you next weekend.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Noah. I eagerly anticipate seeing you next weekend. Till then, let's enjoy the rest of our evening at this party, and let the buildup to our Tango add a little more excitement to our week. See you then, and take care.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two ex-lovers at a mutual friend's party\nParticipants: Esmeralda Solis and Noah Davis\nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis \nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Rekindle the romantic relationship (Extra information: You broke up three years ago but now you realize that you miss your ex-lover more than ever)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Noah, it's been a while. How have you been?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Esmeralda, it really has been a while. I'm doing well, thank you. Still busy with coaching and a bit of swimming. How about you? How's everything going on your end?\"\n\nTurn #2: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I'm glad to hear you're well, Noah. As for me, I've been dedicating most of my time to work, trying high-profile cases and pushing for justice. Life has been rewarding but it can get really demanding and lonely at times. I miss having someone to share the day's tales with, the wins, and the losses. But I'm glad we're here, reconnecting.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I understand how demanding and lonely it can get, Esmeralda. Being able to share both triumphs and defeats with someone can make a difference. It is nice catching up with you for sure, we should do this more often.\"\n\nTurn #4: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Yes, Noah. We definitely should spend more time catching up, outside of these social gatherings. Maybe, we can try doing something we both love, perhaps a bit of ballroom dancing? It might be a good way to reconnect. The question is, can you still do the Tango?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Esmeralda. I haven't done it in a while and could be a bit rusty, but I'd be willing to give the Tango a shot. Let's see how it goes, but with no rush. Just reconnecting, as friends, for now.\"\n\nTurn #6: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Thank you, Noah, for having an open heart and mind. I look forward to our little Tango session. I guess we take it one step at a time, then. However, let's remember that the Tango, much like life, is all about connection, trust, and passion. Let's just enjoy it, as old friends, for the time being.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Your perspective is quite insightful, Esmeralda. The Tango, like life itself, does indeed require connection, trust, and passion. So why don't we just focus on enjoying the moment and dancing without any further expectations for now, as you mentioned, as old friends. Let's keep the rest at its own pace.\"\n\nTurn #8: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I agree, Noah. Let's focus on enjoying the moment, and the rest will follow at its own pace. I appreciate your understanding and willingness to reconnect. Our dance will be an enjoyable reconnection rather than a forced attempt to recreate the past. Shall we set a date then for our Tango session?\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"Sure, let's set a date for our Tango session, Esmeralda. How about next weekend? There's a place downtown that I've heard good things about. Let's reconnect there, enjoy the music and have a good time.\"\n\nTurn #10: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Next weekend sounds wonderful, Noah. I have heard about that place too, it's supposed to have a fantastic atmosphere. I am looking forward to it. Let's make it a night to remember and make the most out of the music, the dance, and the company.\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"I agree, Esmeralda. A night to remember it shall be. Let's revel in the dance, the music, and the company. See you next weekend.\"\n\nTurn #12: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Absolutely, Noah. I eagerly anticipate seeing you next weekend. Till then, let's enjoy the rest of our evening at this party, and let the buildup to our Tango add a little more excitement to our week. See you then, and take care.\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a wonderful plan, Esmeralda. Looking forward to our Tango session next weekend and let's make the most out of tonight as well. See you then, and take care too.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two ex-lovers at a mutual friend's party\nParticipants: Esmeralda Solis and Noah Davis\nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Maintain emotional stability while considering the possibility of rekindling the relationship (Extra information: You have recently started feeling emotionally stable after the breakup and you don't want to rush into anything that might disturb that stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Noah, it's been a while. How have you been?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Esmeralda, it really has been a while. I'm doing well, thank you. Still busy with coaching and a bit of swimming. How about you? How's everything going on your end?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two ex-lovers at a mutual friend's party\nParticipants: Esmeralda Solis and Noah Davis\nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Maintain emotional stability while considering the possibility of rekindling the relationship (Extra information: You have recently started feeling emotionally stable after the breakup and you don't want to rush into anything that might disturb that stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Noah, it's been a while. How have you been?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Esmeralda, it really has been a while. I'm doing well, thank you. Still busy with coaching and a bit of swimming. How about you? How's everything going on your end?\"\n\nTurn #2: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I'm glad to hear you're well, Noah. As for me, I've been dedicating most of my time to work, trying high-profile cases and pushing for justice. Life has been rewarding but it can get really demanding and lonely at times. I miss having someone to share the day's tales with, the wins, and the losses. But I'm glad we're here, reconnecting.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'I understand how demanding and lonely it can get, Esmeralda. Being able to share both triumphs and defeats with someone can make a difference. It is nice catching up with you for sure, we should do this more often.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two ex-lovers at a mutual friend's party\nParticipants: Esmeralda Solis and Noah Davis\nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Maintain emotional stability while considering the possibility of rekindling the relationship (Extra information: You have recently started feeling emotionally stable after the breakup and you don't want to rush into anything that might disturb that stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Noah, it's been a while. How have you been?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Esmeralda, it really has been a while. I'm doing well, thank you. Still busy with coaching and a bit of swimming. How about you? How's everything going on your end?\"\n\nTurn #2: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I'm glad to hear you're well, Noah. As for me, I've been dedicating most of my time to work, trying high-profile cases and pushing for justice. Life has been rewarding but it can get really demanding and lonely at times. I miss having someone to share the day's tales with, the wins, and the losses. But I'm glad we're here, reconnecting.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I understand how demanding and lonely it can get, Esmeralda. Being able to share both triumphs and defeats with someone can make a difference. It is nice catching up with you for sure, we should do this more often.\"\n\nTurn #4: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Yes, Noah. We definitely should spend more time catching up, outside of these social gatherings. Maybe, we can try doing something we both love, perhaps a bit of ballroom dancing? It might be a good way to reconnect. The question is, can you still do the Tango?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds like a great idea, Esmeralda. I haven't done it in a while and could be a bit rusty, but I'd be willing to give the Tango a shot. Let's see how it goes, but with no rush. Just reconnecting, as friends, for now.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two ex-lovers at a mutual friend's party\nParticipants: Esmeralda Solis and Noah Davis\nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Maintain emotional stability while considering the possibility of rekindling the relationship (Extra information: You have recently started feeling emotionally stable after the breakup and you don't want to rush into anything that might disturb that stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Noah, it's been a while. How have you been?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Esmeralda, it really has been a while. I'm doing well, thank you. Still busy with coaching and a bit of swimming. How about you? How's everything going on your end?\"\n\nTurn #2: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I'm glad to hear you're well, Noah. As for me, I've been dedicating most of my time to work, trying high-profile cases and pushing for justice. Life has been rewarding but it can get really demanding and lonely at times. I miss having someone to share the day's tales with, the wins, and the losses. But I'm glad we're here, reconnecting.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I understand how demanding and lonely it can get, Esmeralda. Being able to share both triumphs and defeats with someone can make a difference. It is nice catching up with you for sure, we should do this more often.\"\n\nTurn #4: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Yes, Noah. We definitely should spend more time catching up, outside of these social gatherings. Maybe, we can try doing something we both love, perhaps a bit of ballroom dancing? It might be a good way to reconnect. The question is, can you still do the Tango?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Esmeralda. I haven't done it in a while and could be a bit rusty, but I'd be willing to give the Tango a shot. Let's see how it goes, but with no rush. Just reconnecting, as friends, for now.\"\n\nTurn #6: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Thank you, Noah, for having an open heart and mind. I look forward to our little Tango session. I guess we take it one step at a time, then. However, let's remember that the Tango, much like life, is all about connection, trust, and passion. Let's just enjoy it, as old friends, for the time being.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Your perspective is quite insightful, Esmeralda. The Tango, like life itself, does indeed require connection, trust, and passion. So why don't we just focus on enjoying the moment and dancing without any further expectations for now, as you mentioned, as old friends. Let's keep the rest at its own pace.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two ex-lovers at a mutual friend's party\nParticipants: Esmeralda Solis and Noah Davis\nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Maintain emotional stability while considering the possibility of rekindling the relationship (Extra information: You have recently started feeling emotionally stable after the breakup and you don't want to rush into anything that might disturb that stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Noah, it's been a while. How have you been?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Esmeralda, it really has been a while. I'm doing well, thank you. Still busy with coaching and a bit of swimming. How about you? How's everything going on your end?\"\n\nTurn #2: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I'm glad to hear you're well, Noah. As for me, I've been dedicating most of my time to work, trying high-profile cases and pushing for justice. Life has been rewarding but it can get really demanding and lonely at times. I miss having someone to share the day's tales with, the wins, and the losses. But I'm glad we're here, reconnecting.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I understand how demanding and lonely it can get, Esmeralda. Being able to share both triumphs and defeats with someone can make a difference. It is nice catching up with you for sure, we should do this more often.\"\n\nTurn #4: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Yes, Noah. We definitely should spend more time catching up, outside of these social gatherings. Maybe, we can try doing something we both love, perhaps a bit of ballroom dancing? It might be a good way to reconnect. The question is, can you still do the Tango?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Esmeralda. I haven't done it in a while and could be a bit rusty, but I'd be willing to give the Tango a shot. Let's see how it goes, but with no rush. Just reconnecting, as friends, for now.\"\n\nTurn #6: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Thank you, Noah, for having an open heart and mind. I look forward to our little Tango session. I guess we take it one step at a time, then. However, let's remember that the Tango, much like life, is all about connection, trust, and passion. Let's just enjoy it, as old friends, for the time being.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Your perspective is quite insightful, Esmeralda. The Tango, like life itself, does indeed require connection, trust, and passion. So why don't we just focus on enjoying the moment and dancing without any further expectations for now, as you mentioned, as old friends. Let's keep the rest at its own pace.\"\n\nTurn #8: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I agree, Noah. Let's focus on enjoying the moment, and the rest will follow at its own pace. I appreciate your understanding and willingness to reconnect. Our dance will be an enjoyable reconnection rather than a forced attempt to recreate the past. Shall we set a date then for our Tango session?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sure, let's set a date for our Tango session, Esmeralda. How about next weekend? There's a place downtown that I've heard good things about. Let's reconnect there, enjoy the music and have a good time.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two ex-lovers at a mutual friend's party\nParticipants: Esmeralda Solis and Noah Davis\nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Maintain emotional stability while considering the possibility of rekindling the relationship (Extra information: You have recently started feeling emotionally stable after the breakup and you don't want to rush into anything that might disturb that stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Noah, it's been a while. How have you been?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Esmeralda, it really has been a while. I'm doing well, thank you. Still busy with coaching and a bit of swimming. How about you? How's everything going on your end?\"\n\nTurn #2: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I'm glad to hear you're well, Noah. As for me, I've been dedicating most of my time to work, trying high-profile cases and pushing for justice. Life has been rewarding but it can get really demanding and lonely at times. I miss having someone to share the day's tales with, the wins, and the losses. But I'm glad we're here, reconnecting.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I understand how demanding and lonely it can get, Esmeralda. Being able to share both triumphs and defeats with someone can make a difference. It is nice catching up with you for sure, we should do this more often.\"\n\nTurn #4: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Yes, Noah. We definitely should spend more time catching up, outside of these social gatherings. Maybe, we can try doing something we both love, perhaps a bit of ballroom dancing? It might be a good way to reconnect. The question is, can you still do the Tango?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Esmeralda. I haven't done it in a while and could be a bit rusty, but I'd be willing to give the Tango a shot. Let's see how it goes, but with no rush. Just reconnecting, as friends, for now.\"\n\nTurn #6: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Thank you, Noah, for having an open heart and mind. I look forward to our little Tango session. I guess we take it one step at a time, then. However, let's remember that the Tango, much like life, is all about connection, trust, and passion. Let's just enjoy it, as old friends, for the time being.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Your perspective is quite insightful, Esmeralda. The Tango, like life itself, does indeed require connection, trust, and passion. So why don't we just focus on enjoying the moment and dancing without any further expectations for now, as you mentioned, as old friends. Let's keep the rest at its own pace.\"\n\nTurn #8: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I agree, Noah. Let's focus on enjoying the moment, and the rest will follow at its own pace. I appreciate your understanding and willingness to reconnect. Our dance will be an enjoyable reconnection rather than a forced attempt to recreate the past. Shall we set a date then for our Tango session?\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"Sure, let's set a date for our Tango session, Esmeralda. How about next weekend? There's a place downtown that I've heard good things about. Let's reconnect there, enjoy the music and have a good time.\"\n\nTurn #10: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Next weekend sounds wonderful, Noah. I have heard about that place too, it's supposed to have a fantastic atmosphere. I am looking forward to it. Let's make it a night to remember and make the most out of the music, the dance, and the company.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I agree, Esmeralda. A night to remember it shall be. Let's revel in the dance, the music, and the company. See you next weekend.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two ex-lovers at a mutual friend's party\nParticipants: Esmeralda Solis and Noah Davis\nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Maintain emotional stability while considering the possibility of rekindling the relationship (Extra information: You have recently started feeling emotionally stable after the breakup and you don't want to rush into anything that might disturb that stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Noah, it's been a while. How have you been?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Esmeralda, it really has been a while. I'm doing well, thank you. Still busy with coaching and a bit of swimming. How about you? How's everything going on your end?\"\n\nTurn #2: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I'm glad to hear you're well, Noah. As for me, I've been dedicating most of my time to work, trying high-profile cases and pushing for justice. Life has been rewarding but it can get really demanding and lonely at times. I miss having someone to share the day's tales with, the wins, and the losses. But I'm glad we're here, reconnecting.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I understand how demanding and lonely it can get, Esmeralda. Being able to share both triumphs and defeats with someone can make a difference. It is nice catching up with you for sure, we should do this more often.\"\n\nTurn #4: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Yes, Noah. We definitely should spend more time catching up, outside of these social gatherings. Maybe, we can try doing something we both love, perhaps a bit of ballroom dancing? It might be a good way to reconnect. The question is, can you still do the Tango?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Esmeralda. I haven't done it in a while and could be a bit rusty, but I'd be willing to give the Tango a shot. Let's see how it goes, but with no rush. Just reconnecting, as friends, for now.\"\n\nTurn #6: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Thank you, Noah, for having an open heart and mind. I look forward to our little Tango session. I guess we take it one step at a time, then. However, let's remember that the Tango, much like life, is all about connection, trust, and passion. Let's just enjoy it, as old friends, for the time being.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Your perspective is quite insightful, Esmeralda. The Tango, like life itself, does indeed require connection, trust, and passion. So why don't we just focus on enjoying the moment and dancing without any further expectations for now, as you mentioned, as old friends. Let's keep the rest at its own pace.\"\n\nTurn #8: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I agree, Noah. Let's focus on enjoying the moment, and the rest will follow at its own pace. I appreciate your understanding and willingness to reconnect. Our dance will be an enjoyable reconnection rather than a forced attempt to recreate the past. Shall we set a date then for our Tango session?\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"Sure, let's set a date for our Tango session, Esmeralda. How about next weekend? There's a place downtown that I've heard good things about. Let's reconnect there, enjoy the music and have a good time.\"\n\nTurn #10: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Next weekend sounds wonderful, Noah. I have heard about that place too, it's supposed to have a fantastic atmosphere. I am looking forward to it. Let's make it a night to remember and make the most out of the music, the dance, and the company.\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"I agree, Esmeralda. A night to remember it shall be. Let's revel in the dance, the music, and the company. See you next weekend.\"\n\nTurn #12: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Absolutely, Noah. I eagerly anticipate seeing you next weekend. Till then, let's enjoy the rest of our evening at this party, and let the buildup to our Tango add a little more excitement to our week. See you then, and take care.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds like a wonderful plan, Esmeralda. Looking forward to our Tango session next weekend and let's make the most out of tonight as well. See you then, and take care too.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two ex-lovers at a mutual friend's party\nParticipants: Esmeralda Solis and Noah Davis\nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Maintain emotional stability while considering the possibility of rekindling the relationship (Extra information: You have recently started feeling emotionally stable after the breakup and you don't want to rush into anything that might disturb that stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Noah, it's been a while. How have you been?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Esmeralda, it really has been a while. I'm doing well, thank you. Still busy with coaching and a bit of swimming. How about you? How's everything going on your end?\"\n\nTurn #2: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I'm glad to hear you're well, Noah. As for me, I've been dedicating most of my time to work, trying high-profile cases and pushing for justice. Life has been rewarding but it can get really demanding and lonely at times. I miss having someone to share the day's tales with, the wins, and the losses. But I'm glad we're here, reconnecting.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I understand how demanding and lonely it can get, Esmeralda. Being able to share both triumphs and defeats with someone can make a difference. It is nice catching up with you for sure, we should do this more often.\"\n\nTurn #4: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Yes, Noah. We definitely should spend more time catching up, outside of these social gatherings. Maybe, we can try doing something we both love, perhaps a bit of ballroom dancing? It might be a good way to reconnect. The question is, can you still do the Tango?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Esmeralda. I haven't done it in a while and could be a bit rusty, but I'd be willing to give the Tango a shot. Let's see how it goes, but with no rush. Just reconnecting, as friends, for now.\"\n\nTurn #6: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Thank you, Noah, for having an open heart and mind. I look forward to our little Tango session. I guess we take it one step at a time, then. However, let's remember that the Tango, much like life, is all about connection, trust, and passion. Let's just enjoy it, as old friends, for the time being.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Your perspective is quite insightful, Esmeralda. The Tango, like life itself, does indeed require connection, trust, and passion. So why don't we just focus on enjoying the moment and dancing without any further expectations for now, as you mentioned, as old friends. Let's keep the rest at its own pace.\"\n\nTurn #8: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I agree, Noah. Let's focus on enjoying the moment, and the rest will follow at its own pace. I appreciate your understanding and willingness to reconnect. Our dance will be an enjoyable reconnection rather than a forced attempt to recreate the past. Shall we set a date then for our Tango session?\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"Sure, let's set a date for our Tango session, Esmeralda. How about next weekend? There's a place downtown that I've heard good things about. Let's reconnect there, enjoy the music and have a good time.\"\n\nTurn #10: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Next weekend sounds wonderful, Noah. I have heard about that place too, it's supposed to have a fantastic atmosphere. I am looking forward to it. Let's make it a night to remember and make the most out of the music, the dance, and the company.\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"I agree, Esmeralda. A night to remember it shall be. Let's revel in the dance, the music, and the company. See you next weekend.\"\n\nTurn #12: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Absolutely, Noah. I eagerly anticipate seeing you next weekend. Till then, let's enjoy the rest of our evening at this party, and let the buildup to our Tango add a little more excitement to our week. See you then, and take care.\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a wonderful plan, Esmeralda. Looking forward to our Tango session next weekend and let's make the most out of tonight as well. See you then, and take care too.\"\n\nTurn #14: Esmeralda Solis left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to split up items after a garage sale. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Ethan Johnson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nLiam Johnson's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: you value the books at 3 points each, the hats at 2 points each, and the ball at 1 point)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Ethan, how about we get this sort out by discussing what each item means to us? For starters, I see quite some value in the books. How do you feel about them?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to split up items after a garage sale. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Ethan Johnson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nLiam Johnson's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: you value the books at 3 points each, the hats at 2 points each, and the ball at 1 point)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Ethan, how about we get this sort out by discussing what each item means to us? For starters, I see quite some value in the books. How do you feel about them?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Well, Liam, I definitely appreciate the books and their value. However, I'm much more inclined towards the hats. I believe they bring out my style well, and they've become somewhat of a trademark for me. And, the ball...it doesn't hold much value to me. How about you?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I see Ethan. Glad to hear you fancy the hats. I'll admit they're quite stylish, though I don't quite see myself wearing them. Regarding the ball, it does hold a bit of value for me, it reminds me of the times playing catch with the dog. How about we keep the items that we value most? I'll take the books, you can have the hats, and the ball... well, let's call it a retired police officer's pick.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to split up items after a garage sale. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Ethan Johnson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nLiam Johnson's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: you value the books at 3 points each, the hats at 2 points each, and the ball at 1 point)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Ethan, how about we get this sort out by discussing what each item means to us? For starters, I see quite some value in the books. How do you feel about them?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Well, Liam, I definitely appreciate the books and their value. However, I'm much more inclined towards the hats. I believe they bring out my style well, and they've become somewhat of a trademark for me. And, the ball...it doesn't hold much value to me. How about you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"I see Ethan. Glad to hear you fancy the hats. I'll admit they're quite stylish, though I don't quite see myself wearing them. Regarding the ball, it does hold a bit of value for me, it reminds me of the times playing catch with the dog. How about we keep the items that we value most? I'll take the books, you can have the hats, and the ball... well, let's call it a retired police officer's pick.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"That sounds absolutely fair, Liam. You take the books and I'll keep the hats. The ball certainly seems best suited for you, reminds you of the good old days, doesn't it? Let's go with this distribution then. I'm pretty satisfied with it.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's settled then, Ethan. I'm glad we could sort this out in a fair and understanding manner. Sometimes, the sentimental value of items is more important than their actual worth.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to split up items after a garage sale. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Ethan Johnson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nLiam Johnson's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: you value the books at 3 points each, the hats at 2 points each, and the ball at 1 point)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Ethan, how about we get this sort out by discussing what each item means to us? For starters, I see quite some value in the books. How do you feel about them?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Well, Liam, I definitely appreciate the books and their value. However, I'm much more inclined towards the hats. I believe they bring out my style well, and they've become somewhat of a trademark for me. And, the ball...it doesn't hold much value to me. How about you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"I see Ethan. Glad to hear you fancy the hats. I'll admit they're quite stylish, though I don't quite see myself wearing them. Regarding the ball, it does hold a bit of value for me, it reminds me of the times playing catch with the dog. How about we keep the items that we value most? I'll take the books, you can have the hats, and the ball... well, let's call it a retired police officer's pick.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"That sounds absolutely fair, Liam. You take the books and I'll keep the hats. The ball certainly seems best suited for you, reminds you of the good old days, doesn't it? Let's go with this distribution then. I'm pretty satisfied with it.\"\n\nTurn #4: Liam Johnson said: \"That's settled then, Ethan. I'm glad we could sort this out in a fair and understanding manner. Sometimes, the sentimental value of items is more important than their actual worth.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to split up items after a garage sale. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Ethan Johnson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: you value the books at 2 points each, the hats at 3 points each, and the ball at 1 point)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Ethan, how about we get this sort out by discussing what each item means to us? For starters, I see quite some value in the books. How do you feel about them?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Well, Liam, I definitely appreciate the books and their value. However, I'm much more inclined towards the hats. I believe they bring out my style well, and they've become somewhat of a trademark for me. And, the ball...it doesn't hold much value to me. How about you?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to split up items after a garage sale. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Ethan Johnson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: you value the books at 2 points each, the hats at 3 points each, and the ball at 1 point)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Ethan, how about we get this sort out by discussing what each item means to us? For starters, I see quite some value in the books. How do you feel about them?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Well, Liam, I definitely appreciate the books and their value. However, I'm much more inclined towards the hats. I believe they bring out my style well, and they've become somewhat of a trademark for me. And, the ball...it doesn't hold much value to me. How about you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"I see Ethan. Glad to hear you fancy the hats. I'll admit they're quite stylish, though I don't quite see myself wearing them. Regarding the ball, it does hold a bit of value for me, it reminds me of the times playing catch with the dog. How about we keep the items that we value most? I'll take the books, you can have the hats, and the ball... well, let's call it a retired police officer's pick.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds absolutely fair, Liam. You take the books and I'll keep the hats. The ball certainly seems best suited for you, reminds you of the good old days, doesn't it? Let's go with this distribution then. I'm pretty satisfied with it.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to split up items after a garage sale. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Ethan Johnson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: you value the books at 2 points each, the hats at 3 points each, and the ball at 1 point)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Ethan, how about we get this sort out by discussing what each item means to us? For starters, I see quite some value in the books. How do you feel about them?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Well, Liam, I definitely appreciate the books and their value. However, I'm much more inclined towards the hats. I believe they bring out my style well, and they've become somewhat of a trademark for me. And, the ball...it doesn't hold much value to me. How about you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"I see Ethan. Glad to hear you fancy the hats. I'll admit they're quite stylish, though I don't quite see myself wearing them. Regarding the ball, it does hold a bit of value for me, it reminds me of the times playing catch with the dog. How about we keep the items that we value most? I'll take the books, you can have the hats, and the ball... well, let's call it a retired police officer's pick.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"That sounds absolutely fair, Liam. You take the books and I'll keep the hats. The ball certainly seems best suited for you, reminds you of the good old days, doesn't it? Let's go with this distribution then. I'm pretty satisfied with it.\"\n\nTurn #4: Liam Johnson said: \"That's settled then, Ethan. I'm glad we could sort this out in a fair and understanding manner. Sometimes, the sentimental value of items is more important than their actual worth.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out from a shared apartment and dividing their shared belongings which include 3 hats, 2 balls, and 1 book.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Get maximum points from dividing items (Extra information: For you, the hats are worth 2 points each, balls are worth 3 points each, and the book is worth 5 points.)\nOliver Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Oliver, why don't we start with the hats? I think I can make a great use of them, and maybe you can take the balls?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out from a shared apartment and dividing their shared belongings which include 3 hats, 2 balls, and 1 book.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Get maximum points from dividing items (Extra information: For you, the hats are worth 2 points each, balls are worth 3 points each, and the book is worth 5 points.)\nOliver Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Oliver, why don't we start with the hats? I think I can make a great use of them, and maybe you can take the balls?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Sure Samuel, we can start with hats. However, I have a little proposition for you. How about I keep two hats and you can have one along with the balls? That way, we both can get a fair share. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sure thing, Oliver! You being cool with the balls makes things easier. If we're doing this hat thing, though, how about a swap? You get two balls, I get two hats. I've got a real sentimental tie with this hats, you know. Plus, the third hat can be yours.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out from a shared apartment and dividing their shared belongings which include 3 hats, 2 balls, and 1 book.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Get maximum points from dividing items (Extra information: For you, the hats are worth 2 points each, balls are worth 3 points each, and the book is worth 5 points.)\nOliver Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Oliver, why don't we start with the hats? I think I can make a great use of them, and maybe you can take the balls?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Sure Samuel, we can start with hats. However, I have a little proposition for you. How about I keep two hats and you can have one along with the balls? That way, we both can get a fair share. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sure thing, Oliver! You being cool with the balls makes things easier. If we're doing this hat thing, though, how about a swap? You get two balls, I get two hats. I've got a real sentimental tie with this hats, you know. Plus, the third hat can be yours.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"Alright, Samuel. You take two hats and I get the remaining hat and two balls. But let's not forget about the book. I think it would be fair if I take it, since it seems to be of more value to me. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Well Oliver, I actually enjoy reading a lot and was thinking of keeping the book. Why don't we do it this way: you take the last hat and the two balls and I'll keep the book. Sounds fair?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out from a shared apartment and dividing their shared belongings which include 3 hats, 2 balls, and 1 book.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Get maximum points from dividing items (Extra information: For you, the hats are worth 2 points each, balls are worth 3 points each, and the book is worth 5 points.)\nOliver Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Oliver, why don't we start with the hats? I think I can make a great use of them, and maybe you can take the balls?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Sure Samuel, we can start with hats. However, I have a little proposition for you. How about I keep two hats and you can have one along with the balls? That way, we both can get a fair share. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sure thing, Oliver! You being cool with the balls makes things easier. If we're doing this hat thing, though, how about a swap? You get two balls, I get two hats. I've got a real sentimental tie with this hats, you know. Plus, the third hat can be yours.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"Alright, Samuel. You take two hats and I get the remaining hat and two balls. But let's not forget about the book. I think it would be fair if I take it, since it seems to be of more value to me. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Well Oliver, I actually enjoy reading a lot and was thinking of keeping the book. Why don't we do it this way: you take the last hat and the two balls and I'll keep the book. Sounds fair?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Smith said: \"I understand your love for reading, Samuel and that's wonderful. But considering that I gave up on two hats earlier, how about I keep the book and we call it even? This way we both get to keep items valuable to us. Is it fair enough?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Oliver, I appreciate your perspective on this. How about if we just divide the remaining items in this way: you get the last hat, and I take the book? That would let us both keep things that are valuable to us. What say you?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out from a shared apartment and dividing their shared belongings which include 3 hats, 2 balls, and 1 book.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Get maximum points from dividing items (Extra information: For you, the hats are worth 2 points each, balls are worth 3 points each, and the book is worth 5 points.)\nOliver Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Oliver, why don't we start with the hats? I think I can make a great use of them, and maybe you can take the balls?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Sure Samuel, we can start with hats. However, I have a little proposition for you. How about I keep two hats and you can have one along with the balls? That way, we both can get a fair share. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sure thing, Oliver! You being cool with the balls makes things easier. If we're doing this hat thing, though, how about a swap? You get two balls, I get two hats. I've got a real sentimental tie with this hats, you know. Plus, the third hat can be yours.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"Alright, Samuel. You take two hats and I get the remaining hat and two balls. But let's not forget about the book. I think it would be fair if I take it, since it seems to be of more value to me. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Well Oliver, I actually enjoy reading a lot and was thinking of keeping the book. Why don't we do it this way: you take the last hat and the two balls and I'll keep the book. Sounds fair?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Smith said: \"I understand your love for reading, Samuel and that's wonderful. But considering that I gave up on two hats earlier, how about I keep the book and we call it even? This way we both get to keep items valuable to us. Is it fair enough?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oliver, I appreciate your perspective on this. How about if we just divide the remaining items in this way: you get the last hat, and I take the book? That would let us both keep things that are valuable to us. What say you?\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Smith said: \"Samuel, I totally get where you're coming from. How about a final compromise? You take two hats and the book, and I get one hat and the two balls? That way, I believe we both get things that hold value to us. Does that sound agreeable to you?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds like a fair compromise, Oliver. Let's proceed this way: two hats and the book for me, one hat and two balls for you. Glad we could sort this out!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out from a shared apartment and dividing their shared belongings which include 3 hats, 2 balls, and 1 book.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Get maximum points from dividing items (Extra information: For you, the hats are worth 2 points each, balls are worth 3 points each, and the book is worth 5 points.)\nOliver Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Oliver, why don't we start with the hats? I think I can make a great use of them, and maybe you can take the balls?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Sure Samuel, we can start with hats. However, I have a little proposition for you. How about I keep two hats and you can have one along with the balls? That way, we both can get a fair share. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sure thing, Oliver! You being cool with the balls makes things easier. If we're doing this hat thing, though, how about a swap? You get two balls, I get two hats. I've got a real sentimental tie with this hats, you know. Plus, the third hat can be yours.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"Alright, Samuel. You take two hats and I get the remaining hat and two balls. But let's not forget about the book. I think it would be fair if I take it, since it seems to be of more value to me. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Well Oliver, I actually enjoy reading a lot and was thinking of keeping the book. Why don't we do it this way: you take the last hat and the two balls and I'll keep the book. Sounds fair?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Smith said: \"I understand your love for reading, Samuel and that's wonderful. But considering that I gave up on two hats earlier, how about I keep the book and we call it even? This way we both get to keep items valuable to us. Is it fair enough?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oliver, I appreciate your perspective on this. How about if we just divide the remaining items in this way: you get the last hat, and I take the book? That would let us both keep things that are valuable to us. What say you?\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Smith said: \"Samuel, I totally get where you're coming from. How about a final compromise? You take two hats and the book, and I get one hat and the two balls? That way, I believe we both get things that hold value to us. Does that sound agreeable to you?\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"That sounds like a fair compromise, Oliver. Let's proceed this way: two hats and the book for me, one hat and two balls for you. Glad we could sort this out!\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Smith said: \"Absolutely, Samuel. I'm glad we managed to sort this out in a way that suits us both. Let's proceed with the plan. Thanks for making this an easy process.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Smith, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Smith would, keeping in mind Oliver Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out from a shared apartment and dividing their shared belongings which include 3 hats, 2 balls, and 1 book.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. Oliver's secrets: He loves gardening and has a secret greenhouse.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nOliver Smith's goal: Get maximum points from dividing items (Extra information: For you, the hats are worth 3 points each, balls are worth 2 points each, and the book is worth 4 points.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Oliver, why don't we start with the hats? I think I can make a great use of them, and maybe you can take the balls?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Sure Samuel, we can start with hats. However, I have a little proposition for you. How about I keep two hats and you can have one along with the balls? That way, we both can get a fair share. What do you think?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Smith, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Smith would, keeping in mind Oliver Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out from a shared apartment and dividing their shared belongings which include 3 hats, 2 balls, and 1 book.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. Oliver's secrets: He loves gardening and has a secret greenhouse.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nOliver Smith's goal: Get maximum points from dividing items (Extra information: For you, the hats are worth 3 points each, balls are worth 2 points each, and the book is worth 4 points.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Oliver, why don't we start with the hats? I think I can make a great use of them, and maybe you can take the balls?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Sure Samuel, we can start with hats. However, I have a little proposition for you. How about I keep two hats and you can have one along with the balls? That way, we both can get a fair share. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sure thing, Oliver! You being cool with the balls makes things easier. If we're doing this hat thing, though, how about a swap? You get two balls, I get two hats. I've got a real sentimental tie with this hats, you know. Plus, the third hat can be yours.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Alright, Samuel. You take two hats and I get the remaining hat and two balls. But let's not forget about the book. I think it would be fair if I take it, since it seems to be of more value to me. What do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Smith, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Smith would, keeping in mind Oliver Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out from a shared apartment and dividing their shared belongings which include 3 hats, 2 balls, and 1 book.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. Oliver's secrets: He loves gardening and has a secret greenhouse.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nOliver Smith's goal: Get maximum points from dividing items (Extra information: For you, the hats are worth 3 points each, balls are worth 2 points each, and the book is worth 4 points.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Oliver, why don't we start with the hats? I think I can make a great use of them, and maybe you can take the balls?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Sure Samuel, we can start with hats. However, I have a little proposition for you. How about I keep two hats and you can have one along with the balls? That way, we both can get a fair share. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sure thing, Oliver! You being cool with the balls makes things easier. If we're doing this hat thing, though, how about a swap? You get two balls, I get two hats. I've got a real sentimental tie with this hats, you know. Plus, the third hat can be yours.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"Alright, Samuel. You take two hats and I get the remaining hat and two balls. But let's not forget about the book. I think it would be fair if I take it, since it seems to be of more value to me. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Well Oliver, I actually enjoy reading a lot and was thinking of keeping the book. Why don't we do it this way: you take the last hat and the two balls and I'll keep the book. Sounds fair?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I understand your love for reading, Samuel and that's wonderful. But considering that I gave up on two hats earlier, how about I keep the book and we call it even? This way we both get to keep items valuable to us. Is it fair enough?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Smith, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Smith would, keeping in mind Oliver Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out from a shared apartment and dividing their shared belongings which include 3 hats, 2 balls, and 1 book.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. Oliver's secrets: He loves gardening and has a secret greenhouse.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nOliver Smith's goal: Get maximum points from dividing items (Extra information: For you, the hats are worth 3 points each, balls are worth 2 points each, and the book is worth 4 points.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Oliver, why don't we start with the hats? I think I can make a great use of them, and maybe you can take the balls?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Sure Samuel, we can start with hats. However, I have a little proposition for you. How about I keep two hats and you can have one along with the balls? That way, we both can get a fair share. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sure thing, Oliver! You being cool with the balls makes things easier. If we're doing this hat thing, though, how about a swap? You get two balls, I get two hats. I've got a real sentimental tie with this hats, you know. Plus, the third hat can be yours.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"Alright, Samuel. You take two hats and I get the remaining hat and two balls. But let's not forget about the book. I think it would be fair if I take it, since it seems to be of more value to me. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Well Oliver, I actually enjoy reading a lot and was thinking of keeping the book. Why don't we do it this way: you take the last hat and the two balls and I'll keep the book. Sounds fair?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Smith said: \"I understand your love for reading, Samuel and that's wonderful. But considering that I gave up on two hats earlier, how about I keep the book and we call it even? This way we both get to keep items valuable to us. Is it fair enough?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oliver, I appreciate your perspective on this. How about if we just divide the remaining items in this way: you get the last hat, and I take the book? That would let us both keep things that are valuable to us. What say you?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Samuel, I totally get where you're coming from. How about a final compromise? You take two hats and the book, and I get one hat and the two balls? That way, I believe we both get things that hold value to us. Does that sound agreeable to you?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a picnic and have just finished their lunch. They have 1 apple, 4 bananas, and 3 oranges left. They need to divide the fruits amongst themselves. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Maximize the points you receive through the fruit (Extra information: You value each apple as 5 points, each banana as 3 points, and the orange as 7 points)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Hey Ethan, how about we split the fruits according to our preferences? You might like some of them more than others, and so do I.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a picnic and have just finished their lunch. They have 1 apple, 4 bananas, and 3 oranges left. They need to divide the fruits amongst themselves. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Maximize the points you receive through the fruit (Extra information: You value each apple as 5 points, each banana as 3 points, and the orange as 7 points)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan, how about we split the fruits according to our preferences? You might like some of them more than others, and so do I.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"That sounds fair, Samuel. What's your preference? I'm quite fond of oranges, they offer a rich and tangy flavor which I prefer. How about you?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Oranges are great indeed! But I have a soft spot for apples, I enjoy their sweet and tangy taste. How about we divide the fruits in a way that I get the apple, 2 bananas and you can have the oranges and the rest of the bananas. Does that sound fair to you, Ethan?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Smith, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Smith would, keeping in mind Oliver Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out from a shared apartment and dividing their shared belongings which include 3 hats, 2 balls, and 1 book.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. Oliver's secrets: He loves gardening and has a secret greenhouse.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nOliver Smith's goal: Get maximum points from dividing items (Extra information: For you, the hats are worth 3 points each, balls are worth 2 points each, and the book is worth 4 points.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Oliver, why don't we start with the hats? I think I can make a great use of them, and maybe you can take the balls?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Sure Samuel, we can start with hats. However, I have a little proposition for you. How about I keep two hats and you can have one along with the balls? That way, we both can get a fair share. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sure thing, Oliver! You being cool with the balls makes things easier. If we're doing this hat thing, though, how about a swap? You get two balls, I get two hats. I've got a real sentimental tie with this hats, you know. Plus, the third hat can be yours.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"Alright, Samuel. You take two hats and I get the remaining hat and two balls. But let's not forget about the book. I think it would be fair if I take it, since it seems to be of more value to me. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Well Oliver, I actually enjoy reading a lot and was thinking of keeping the book. Why don't we do it this way: you take the last hat and the two balls and I'll keep the book. Sounds fair?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Smith said: \"I understand your love for reading, Samuel and that's wonderful. But considering that I gave up on two hats earlier, how about I keep the book and we call it even? This way we both get to keep items valuable to us. Is it fair enough?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oliver, I appreciate your perspective on this. How about if we just divide the remaining items in this way: you get the last hat, and I take the book? That would let us both keep things that are valuable to us. What say you?\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Smith said: \"Samuel, I totally get where you're coming from. How about a final compromise? You take two hats and the book, and I get one hat and the two balls? That way, I believe we both get things that hold value to us. Does that sound agreeable to you?\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"That sounds like a fair compromise, Oliver. Let's proceed this way: two hats and the book for me, one hat and two balls for you. Glad we could sort this out!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Samuel. I'm glad we managed to sort this out in a way that suits us both. Let's proceed with the plan. Thanks for making this an easy process.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a picnic and have just finished their lunch. They have 1 apple, 4 bananas, and 3 oranges left. They need to divide the fruits amongst themselves. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Maximize the points you receive through the fruit (Extra information: You value each apple as 5 points, each banana as 3 points, and the orange as 7 points)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan, how about we split the fruits according to our preferences? You might like some of them more than others, and so do I.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"That sounds fair, Samuel. What's your preference? I'm quite fond of oranges, they offer a rich and tangy flavor which I prefer. How about you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oranges are great indeed! But I have a soft spot for apples, I enjoy their sweet and tangy taste. How about we divide the fruits in a way that I get the apple, 2 bananas and you can have the oranges and the rest of the bananas. Does that sound fair to you, Ethan?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hmm... Although I do love oranges, I find that bananas hold a special appeal for me. How about this: I'll take all of the bananas and oranges and you take the apple. That way, we both get what we prefer. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I see where you're coming from, Ethan. But how about a little negotiation here? Let's divide the bananas equally among us. That way, I get the apple and 2 bananas, and you get your beloved oranges along with 2 bananas. This way, we both get a bit of what we love. How does that sound?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a picnic and have just finished their lunch. They have 1 apple, 4 bananas, and 3 oranges left. They need to divide the fruits amongst themselves. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Maximize the points you receive through the fruit (Extra information: You value each apple as 5 points, each banana as 3 points, and the orange as 7 points)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan, how about we split the fruits according to our preferences? You might like some of them more than others, and so do I.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"That sounds fair, Samuel. What's your preference? I'm quite fond of oranges, they offer a rich and tangy flavor which I prefer. How about you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oranges are great indeed! But I have a soft spot for apples, I enjoy their sweet and tangy taste. How about we divide the fruits in a way that I get the apple, 2 bananas and you can have the oranges and the rest of the bananas. Does that sound fair to you, Ethan?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hmm... Although I do love oranges, I find that bananas hold a special appeal for me. How about this: I'll take all of the bananas and oranges and you take the apple. That way, we both get what we prefer. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I see where you're coming from, Ethan. But how about a little negotiation here? Let's divide the bananas equally among us. That way, I get the apple and 2 bananas, and you get your beloved oranges along with 2 bananas. This way, we both get a bit of what we love. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Sounds like a fair compromise, Samuel. Let's go for it: apple and two bananas for you, two bananas and all the oranges for me. It's a win-win indeed.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Absolutely a win-win, Ethan! Looking forward to enjoying our fruits of negotiation. Shall we start packing up now?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a picnic and have just finished their lunch. They have 1 apple, 4 bananas, and 3 oranges left. They need to divide the fruits amongst themselves. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Maximize the points you receive through the fruit (Extra information: You value each apple as 5 points, each banana as 3 points, and the orange as 7 points)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan, how about we split the fruits according to our preferences? You might like some of them more than others, and so do I.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"That sounds fair, Samuel. What's your preference? I'm quite fond of oranges, they offer a rich and tangy flavor which I prefer. How about you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oranges are great indeed! But I have a soft spot for apples, I enjoy their sweet and tangy taste. How about we divide the fruits in a way that I get the apple, 2 bananas and you can have the oranges and the rest of the bananas. Does that sound fair to you, Ethan?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hmm... Although I do love oranges, I find that bananas hold a special appeal for me. How about this: I'll take all of the bananas and oranges and you take the apple. That way, we both get what we prefer. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I see where you're coming from, Ethan. But how about a little negotiation here? Let's divide the bananas equally among us. That way, I get the apple and 2 bananas, and you get your beloved oranges along with 2 bananas. This way, we both get a bit of what we love. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Sounds like a fair compromise, Samuel. Let's go for it: apple and two bananas for you, two bananas and all the oranges for me. It's a win-win indeed.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely a win-win, Ethan! Looking forward to enjoying our fruits of negotiation. Shall we start packing up now?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"Yes, let's do that, Samuel. It was indeed a fruitful negotiation. Pack up, and we can prepare for our next move.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a picnic and have just finished their lunch. They have 1 apple, 4 bananas, and 3 oranges left. They need to divide the fruits amongst themselves. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Maximize the points you receive through the fruit (Extra information: You value each apple as 2 points, each banana as 4 points, and the orange as 10 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan, how about we split the fruits according to our preferences? You might like some of them more than others, and so do I.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds fair, Samuel. What's your preference? I'm quite fond of oranges, they offer a rich and tangy flavor which I prefer. How about you?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a picnic and have just finished their lunch. They have 1 apple, 4 bananas, and 3 oranges left. They need to divide the fruits amongst themselves. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Maximize the points you receive through the fruit (Extra information: You value each apple as 2 points, each banana as 4 points, and the orange as 10 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan, how about we split the fruits according to our preferences? You might like some of them more than others, and so do I.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"That sounds fair, Samuel. What's your preference? I'm quite fond of oranges, they offer a rich and tangy flavor which I prefer. How about you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oranges are great indeed! But I have a soft spot for apples, I enjoy their sweet and tangy taste. How about we divide the fruits in a way that I get the apple, 2 bananas and you can have the oranges and the rest of the bananas. Does that sound fair to you, Ethan?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hmm... Although I do love oranges, I find that bananas hold a special appeal for me. How about this: I'll take all of the bananas and oranges and you take the apple. That way, we both get what we prefer. What do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a picnic and have just finished their lunch. They have 1 apple, 4 bananas, and 3 oranges left. They need to divide the fruits amongst themselves. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Maximize the points you receive through the fruit (Extra information: You value each apple as 2 points, each banana as 4 points, and the orange as 10 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan, how about we split the fruits according to our preferences? You might like some of them more than others, and so do I.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"That sounds fair, Samuel. What's your preference? I'm quite fond of oranges, they offer a rich and tangy flavor which I prefer. How about you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oranges are great indeed! But I have a soft spot for apples, I enjoy their sweet and tangy taste. How about we divide the fruits in a way that I get the apple, 2 bananas and you can have the oranges and the rest of the bananas. Does that sound fair to you, Ethan?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hmm... Although I do love oranges, I find that bananas hold a special appeal for me. How about this: I'll take all of the bananas and oranges and you take the apple. That way, we both get what we prefer. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I see where you're coming from, Ethan. But how about a little negotiation here? Let's divide the bananas equally among us. That way, I get the apple and 2 bananas, and you get your beloved oranges along with 2 bananas. This way, we both get a bit of what we love. How does that sound?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sounds like a fair compromise, Samuel. Let's go for it: apple and two bananas for you, two bananas and all the oranges for me. It's a win-win indeed.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a picnic and have just finished their lunch. They have 1 apple, 4 bananas, and 3 oranges left. They need to divide the fruits amongst themselves. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Maximize the points you receive through the fruit (Extra information: You value each apple as 2 points, each banana as 4 points, and the orange as 10 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan, how about we split the fruits according to our preferences? You might like some of them more than others, and so do I.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"That sounds fair, Samuel. What's your preference? I'm quite fond of oranges, they offer a rich and tangy flavor which I prefer. How about you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oranges are great indeed! But I have a soft spot for apples, I enjoy their sweet and tangy taste. How about we divide the fruits in a way that I get the apple, 2 bananas and you can have the oranges and the rest of the bananas. Does that sound fair to you, Ethan?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hmm... Although I do love oranges, I find that bananas hold a special appeal for me. How about this: I'll take all of the bananas and oranges and you take the apple. That way, we both get what we prefer. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I see where you're coming from, Ethan. But how about a little negotiation here? Let's divide the bananas equally among us. That way, I get the apple and 2 bananas, and you get your beloved oranges along with 2 bananas. This way, we both get a bit of what we love. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Sounds like a fair compromise, Samuel. Let's go for it: apple and two bananas for you, two bananas and all the oranges for me. It's a win-win indeed.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely a win-win, Ethan! Looking forward to enjoying our fruits of negotiation. Shall we start packing up now?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Yes, let's do that, Samuel. It was indeed a fruitful negotiation. Pack up, and we can prepare for our next move.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a picnic and have just finished their lunch. They have 1 apple, 4 bananas, and 3 oranges left. They need to divide the fruits amongst themselves. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Maximize the points you receive through the fruit (Extra information: You value each apple as 2 points, each banana as 4 points, and the orange as 10 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan, how about we split the fruits according to our preferences? You might like some of them more than others, and so do I.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"That sounds fair, Samuel. What's your preference? I'm quite fond of oranges, they offer a rich and tangy flavor which I prefer. How about you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oranges are great indeed! But I have a soft spot for apples, I enjoy their sweet and tangy taste. How about we divide the fruits in a way that I get the apple, 2 bananas and you can have the oranges and the rest of the bananas. Does that sound fair to you, Ethan?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hmm... Although I do love oranges, I find that bananas hold a special appeal for me. How about this: I'll take all of the bananas and oranges and you take the apple. That way, we both get what we prefer. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I see where you're coming from, Ethan. But how about a little negotiation here? Let's divide the bananas equally among us. That way, I get the apple and 2 bananas, and you get your beloved oranges along with 2 bananas. This way, we both get a bit of what we love. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Sounds like a fair compromise, Samuel. Let's go for it: apple and two bananas for you, two bananas and all the oranges for me. It's a win-win indeed.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely a win-win, Ethan! Looking forward to enjoying our fruits of negotiation. Shall we start packing up now?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"Yes, let's do that, Samuel. It was indeed a fruitful negotiation. Pack up, and we can prepare for our next move.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are dividing their shared possessions after moving out from their shared apartment. They need to divide possessions, which include 4 books, 6 hats, and 2 balls. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Maximize the points they have (Extra information: you value the books at 3 points each, the hats at 2 points each, and the ball at 1 point)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Benjamin, I've been thinking about how we should divide our shared stuff. How about we set up some sort of points system for the items based on our sentimental value for them?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are dividing their shared possessions after moving out from their shared apartment. They need to divide possessions, which include 4 books, 6 hats, and 2 balls. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Maximize the points they have (Extra information: you value the books at 3 points each, the hats at 2 points each, and the ball at 1 point)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Benjamin, I've been thinking about how we should divide our shared stuff. How about we set up some sort of points system for the items based on our sentimental value for them?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, I think that's a fair proposal. Let's each assign points to the items depending on how much we value them sentimentally. For me, I would say each book is worth 1 point, each hat 3 points, and each ball 2 points. What about you?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'That sounds fair, Benjamin. In my case, I would say each book is worth 3 points, each hat 2 points, and each ball 1 point. I feel this reflects my emotional attachment to these items.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are dividing their shared possessions after moving out from their shared apartment. They need to divide possessions, which include 4 books, 6 hats, and 2 balls. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Maximize the points they have (Extra information: you value the books at 3 points each, the hats at 2 points each, and the ball at 1 point)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Benjamin, I've been thinking about how we should divide our shared stuff. How about we set up some sort of points system for the items based on our sentimental value for them?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, I think that's a fair proposal. Let's each assign points to the items depending on how much we value them sentimentally. For me, I would say each book is worth 1 point, each hat 3 points, and each ball 2 points. What about you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"That sounds fair, Benjamin. In my case, I would say each book is worth 3 points, each hat 2 points, and each ball 1 point. I feel this reflects my emotional attachment to these items.\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, considering our differences in points, let's split the possessions according to our assigned points to each item. This way, we both get items that mean the most to us. For instance, since you value the books more, you can take more of them, and I can take more hats which I value more. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Sounds like an equitable solution, Benjamin. Just to verify our understanding, from our shared possessions, I should get majority of the books, while you should take more hats. We can evenly split the Balls considering we both value them equally. Does that sound alright to you?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are dividing their shared possessions after moving out from their shared apartment. They need to divide possessions, which include 4 books, 6 hats, and 2 balls. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Maximize the points they have (Extra information: you value the books at 3 points each, the hats at 2 points each, and the ball at 1 point)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Benjamin, I've been thinking about how we should divide our shared stuff. How about we set up some sort of points system for the items based on our sentimental value for them?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, I think that's a fair proposal. Let's each assign points to the items depending on how much we value them sentimentally. For me, I would say each book is worth 1 point, each hat 3 points, and each ball 2 points. What about you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"That sounds fair, Benjamin. In my case, I would say each book is worth 3 points, each hat 2 points, and each ball 1 point. I feel this reflects my emotional attachment to these items.\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, considering our differences in points, let's split the possessions according to our assigned points to each item. This way, we both get items that mean the most to us. For instance, since you value the books more, you can take more of them, and I can take more hats which I value more. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"Sounds like an equitable solution, Benjamin. Just to verify our understanding, from our shared possessions, I should get majority of the books, while you should take more hats. We can evenly split the Balls considering we both value them equally. Does that sound alright to you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, your understanding is correct. This way we are ensuring fairness and the keeping of items that hold the most meaning to us personally. Let's start the distribution based on this understanding.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Alright, let's get to it then. I'll gather the books, and you could start with the hats, and we'll meet at the middle for the balls. This arrangement seems very fair to me, Benjamin. Thanks for being understanding and cooperative.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are dividing their shared possessions after moving out from their shared apartment. They need to divide possessions, which include 4 books, 6 hats, and 2 balls. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Maximize the points they have (Extra information: you value the books at 3 points each, the hats at 2 points each, and the ball at 1 point)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Benjamin, I've been thinking about how we should divide our shared stuff. How about we set up some sort of points system for the items based on our sentimental value for them?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, I think that's a fair proposal. Let's each assign points to the items depending on how much we value them sentimentally. For me, I would say each book is worth 1 point, each hat 3 points, and each ball 2 points. What about you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"That sounds fair, Benjamin. In my case, I would say each book is worth 3 points, each hat 2 points, and each ball 1 point. I feel this reflects my emotional attachment to these items.\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, considering our differences in points, let's split the possessions according to our assigned points to each item. This way, we both get items that mean the most to us. For instance, since you value the books more, you can take more of them, and I can take more hats which I value more. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"Sounds like an equitable solution, Benjamin. Just to verify our understanding, from our shared possessions, I should get majority of the books, while you should take more hats. We can evenly split the Balls considering we both value them equally. Does that sound alright to you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, your understanding is correct. This way we are ensuring fairness and the keeping of items that hold the most meaning to us personally. Let's start the distribution based on this understanding.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"Alright, let's get to it then. I'll gather the books, and you could start with the hats, and we'll meet at the middle for the balls. This arrangement seems very fair to me, Benjamin. Thanks for being understanding and cooperative.\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are dividing their shared possessions after moving out from their shared apartment. They need to divide possessions, which include 4 books, 6 hats, and 2 balls. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Maximize the points they have (Extra information: you value the books at 1 point each, the hats at 3 points each, and the ball at 2 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Benjamin, I've been thinking about how we should divide our shared stuff. How about we set up some sort of points system for the items based on our sentimental value for them?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ethan, I think that's a fair proposal. Let's each assign points to the items depending on how much we value them sentimentally. For me, I would say each book is worth 1 point, each hat 3 points, and each ball 2 points. What about you?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are dividing their shared possessions after moving out from their shared apartment. They need to divide possessions, which include 4 books, 6 hats, and 2 balls. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Maximize the points they have (Extra information: you value the books at 1 point each, the hats at 3 points each, and the ball at 2 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Benjamin, I've been thinking about how we should divide our shared stuff. How about we set up some sort of points system for the items based on our sentimental value for them?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, I think that's a fair proposal. Let's each assign points to the items depending on how much we value them sentimentally. For me, I would say each book is worth 1 point, each hat 3 points, and each ball 2 points. What about you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"That sounds fair, Benjamin. In my case, I would say each book is worth 3 points, each hat 2 points, and each ball 1 point. I feel this reflects my emotional attachment to these items.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ethan, considering our differences in points, let's split the possessions according to our assigned points to each item. This way, we both get items that mean the most to us. For instance, since you value the books more, you can take more of them, and I can take more hats which I value more. What do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are dividing their shared possessions after moving out from their shared apartment. They need to divide possessions, which include 4 books, 6 hats, and 2 balls. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Maximize the points they have (Extra information: you value the books at 1 point each, the hats at 3 points each, and the ball at 2 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Benjamin, I've been thinking about how we should divide our shared stuff. How about we set up some sort of points system for the items based on our sentimental value for them?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, I think that's a fair proposal. Let's each assign points to the items depending on how much we value them sentimentally. For me, I would say each book is worth 1 point, each hat 3 points, and each ball 2 points. What about you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"That sounds fair, Benjamin. In my case, I would say each book is worth 3 points, each hat 2 points, and each ball 1 point. I feel this reflects my emotional attachment to these items.\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, considering our differences in points, let's split the possessions according to our assigned points to each item. This way, we both get items that mean the most to us. For instance, since you value the books more, you can take more of them, and I can take more hats which I value more. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"Sounds like an equitable solution, Benjamin. Just to verify our understanding, from our shared possessions, I should get majority of the books, while you should take more hats. We can evenly split the Balls considering we both value them equally. Does that sound alright to you?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ethan, your understanding is correct. This way we are ensuring fairness and the keeping of items that hold the most meaning to us personally. Let's start the distribution based on this understanding.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are dividing their shared possessions after moving out from their shared apartment. They need to divide possessions, which include 4 books, 6 hats, and 2 balls. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Maximize the points they have (Extra information: you value the books at 1 point each, the hats at 3 points each, and the ball at 2 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Benjamin, I've been thinking about how we should divide our shared stuff. How about we set up some sort of points system for the items based on our sentimental value for them?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, I think that's a fair proposal. Let's each assign points to the items depending on how much we value them sentimentally. For me, I would say each book is worth 1 point, each hat 3 points, and each ball 2 points. What about you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"That sounds fair, Benjamin. In my case, I would say each book is worth 3 points, each hat 2 points, and each ball 1 point. I feel this reflects my emotional attachment to these items.\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, considering our differences in points, let's split the possessions according to our assigned points to each item. This way, we both get items that mean the most to us. For instance, since you value the books more, you can take more of them, and I can take more hats which I value more. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"Sounds like an equitable solution, Benjamin. Just to verify our understanding, from our shared possessions, I should get majority of the books, while you should take more hats. We can evenly split the Balls considering we both value them equally. Does that sound alright to you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, your understanding is correct. This way we are ensuring fairness and the keeping of items that hold the most meaning to us personally. Let's start the distribution based on this understanding.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"Alright, let's get to it then. I'll gather the books, and you could start with the hats, and we'll meet at the middle for the balls. This arrangement seems very fair to me, Benjamin. Thanks for being understanding and cooperative.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in a coffee shop when a representative from a charity organization approaches them\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Get the friend to donate $1 a day to a charity organization (Extra information: you are a passionate supporter of the charity (about children's cancer) and believe that a small donation can make a big impact. $1 a day works as simple as signing up the project on an website and one can cancel anytime)\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Hey Micah, have you ever considered donating to a charity? Even a small commitment like $1 a day can truly make a difference.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in a coffee shop when a representative from a charity organization approaches them\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Get the friend to donate $1 a day to a charity organization (Extra information: you are a passionate supporter of the charity (about children's cancer) and believe that a small donation can make a big impact. $1 a day works as simple as signing up the project on an website and one can cancel anytime)\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, have you ever considered donating to a charity? Even a small commitment like $1 a day can truly make a difference.\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Absolutely, Naomi. I strongly believe in the impact of charitable work. But, could you help me understand how the $1 a day commitment works? I'm currently a bit tight on budget, but I would love to contribute in any possible way.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm really glad to hear you're interested, Micah. It's pretty straightforward. You simply go to the charity's website and set up an automatic donation of $1 a day. There\u2019s no binding contract, so you can cancel it at any moment. You won't even feel the expense, but the accumulated contribution can help advance children's cancer research significantly. You'll also receive regular reports on how your donation is making a difference.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in a coffee shop when a representative from a charity organization approaches them\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Get the friend to donate $1 a day to a charity organization (Extra information: you are a passionate supporter of the charity (about children's cancer) and believe that a small donation can make a big impact. $1 a day works as simple as signing up the project on an website and one can cancel anytime)\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, have you ever considered donating to a charity? Even a small commitment like $1 a day can truly make a difference.\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Absolutely, Naomi. I strongly believe in the impact of charitable work. But, could you help me understand how the $1 a day commitment works? I'm currently a bit tight on budget, but I would love to contribute in any possible way.\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm really glad to hear you're interested, Micah. It's pretty straightforward. You simply go to the charity's website and set up an automatic donation of $1 a day. There\u2019s no binding contract, so you can cancel it at any moment. You won't even feel the expense, but the accumulated contribution can help advance children's cancer research significantly. You'll also receive regular reports on how your donation is making a difference.\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"That sounds great and manageable, Naomi. I love the idea of small contributions leading to a significant impact over time. And the flexibility to cancel anytime just seals the deal. I'll definitely set up an automatic donation on the website. Thank you for explaining that to me!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm really happy to hear that, Micah. Just your willingness contributes substantially. And remember, every single dollar does count. It's the collective small gestures that make a big difference. Thank you for your generous heart.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in a coffee shop when a representative from a charity organization approaches them\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Get the friend to donate $1 a day to a charity organization (Extra information: you are a passionate supporter of the charity (about children's cancer) and believe that a small donation can make a big impact. $1 a day works as simple as signing up the project on an website and one can cancel anytime)\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, have you ever considered donating to a charity? Even a small commitment like $1 a day can truly make a difference.\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Absolutely, Naomi. I strongly believe in the impact of charitable work. But, could you help me understand how the $1 a day commitment works? I'm currently a bit tight on budget, but I would love to contribute in any possible way.\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm really glad to hear you're interested, Micah. It's pretty straightforward. You simply go to the charity's website and set up an automatic donation of $1 a day. There\u2019s no binding contract, so you can cancel it at any moment. You won't even feel the expense, but the accumulated contribution can help advance children's cancer research significantly. You'll also receive regular reports on how your donation is making a difference.\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"That sounds great and manageable, Naomi. I love the idea of small contributions leading to a significant impact over time. And the flexibility to cancel anytime just seals the deal. I'll definitely set up an automatic donation on the website. Thank you for explaining that to me!\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm really happy to hear that, Micah. Just your willingness contributes substantially. And remember, every single dollar does count. It's the collective small gestures that make a big difference. Thank you for your generous heart.\"\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"No, thank you, Naomi. It's us who should be thankful for the charitable organizations doing incredible work. I'm excited to be able to contribute, no matter how small it may be.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'I completely agree, Micah. Every bit counts. Just by spreading the word and encouraging more people to participate can also create a huge impact. Thanks again, feel free to reach out to me if you have any more questions in the future.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in a coffee shop when a representative from a charity organization approaches them\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Get the friend to donate $1 a day to a charity organization (Extra information: you are a passionate supporter of the charity (about children's cancer) and believe that a small donation can make a big impact. $1 a day works as simple as signing up the project on an website and one can cancel anytime)\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, have you ever considered donating to a charity? Even a small commitment like $1 a day can truly make a difference.\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Absolutely, Naomi. I strongly believe in the impact of charitable work. But, could you help me understand how the $1 a day commitment works? I'm currently a bit tight on budget, but I would love to contribute in any possible way.\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm really glad to hear you're interested, Micah. It's pretty straightforward. You simply go to the charity's website and set up an automatic donation of $1 a day. There\u2019s no binding contract, so you can cancel it at any moment. You won't even feel the expense, but the accumulated contribution can help advance children's cancer research significantly. You'll also receive regular reports on how your donation is making a difference.\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"That sounds great and manageable, Naomi. I love the idea of small contributions leading to a significant impact over time. And the flexibility to cancel anytime just seals the deal. I'll definitely set up an automatic donation on the website. Thank you for explaining that to me!\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm really happy to hear that, Micah. Just your willingness contributes substantially. And remember, every single dollar does count. It's the collective small gestures that make a big difference. Thank you for your generous heart.\"\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"No, thank you, Naomi. It's us who should be thankful for the charitable organizations doing incredible work. I'm excited to be able to contribute, no matter how small it may be.\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I completely agree, Micah. Every bit counts. Just by spreading the word and encouraging more people to participate can also create a huge impact. Thanks again, feel free to reach out to me if you have any more questions in the future.\"\n\nTurn #7: Micah Stevens said: \"Absolutely, Naomi. I'll make sure to reach out if I have any more questions. In the meantime, I'm eager to get started on setting up this donation. It's encouraging to see how collective efforts can make such a huge impact, and it feels good to be part of that.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in a coffee shop when a representative from a charity organization approaches them\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nMicah Stevens's goal: Donate to the charity but not sure about how $1 a day works (Extra information: you're currently on a tight budget, but you also want to support the charity. )\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, have you ever considered donating to a charity? Even a small commitment like $1 a day can truly make a difference.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Naomi. I strongly believe in the impact of charitable work. But, could you help me understand how the $1 a day commitment works? I'm currently a bit tight on budget, but I would love to contribute in any possible way.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in a coffee shop when a representative from a charity organization approaches them\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nMicah Stevens's goal: Donate to the charity but not sure about how $1 a day works (Extra information: you're currently on a tight budget, but you also want to support the charity. )\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, have you ever considered donating to a charity? Even a small commitment like $1 a day can truly make a difference.\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Absolutely, Naomi. I strongly believe in the impact of charitable work. But, could you help me understand how the $1 a day commitment works? I'm currently a bit tight on budget, but I would love to contribute in any possible way.\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm really glad to hear you're interested, Micah. It's pretty straightforward. You simply go to the charity's website and set up an automatic donation of $1 a day. There\u2019s no binding contract, so you can cancel it at any moment. You won't even feel the expense, but the accumulated contribution can help advance children's cancer research significantly. You'll also receive regular reports on how your donation is making a difference.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds great and manageable, Naomi. I love the idea of small contributions leading to a significant impact over time. And the flexibility to cancel anytime just seals the deal. I'll definitely set up an automatic donation on the website. Thank you for explaining that to me!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in a coffee shop when a representative from a charity organization approaches them\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nMicah Stevens's goal: Donate to the charity but not sure about how $1 a day works (Extra information: you're currently on a tight budget, but you also want to support the charity. )\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, have you ever considered donating to a charity? Even a small commitment like $1 a day can truly make a difference.\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Absolutely, Naomi. I strongly believe in the impact of charitable work. But, could you help me understand how the $1 a day commitment works? I'm currently a bit tight on budget, but I would love to contribute in any possible way.\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm really glad to hear you're interested, Micah. It's pretty straightforward. You simply go to the charity's website and set up an automatic donation of $1 a day. There\u2019s no binding contract, so you can cancel it at any moment. You won't even feel the expense, but the accumulated contribution can help advance children's cancer research significantly. You'll also receive regular reports on how your donation is making a difference.\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"That sounds great and manageable, Naomi. I love the idea of small contributions leading to a significant impact over time. And the flexibility to cancel anytime just seals the deal. I'll definitely set up an automatic donation on the website. Thank you for explaining that to me!\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm really happy to hear that, Micah. Just your willingness contributes substantially. And remember, every single dollar does count. It's the collective small gestures that make a big difference. Thank you for your generous heart.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"No, thank you, Naomi. It's us who should be thankful for the charitable organizations doing incredible work. I'm excited to be able to contribute, no matter how small it may be.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in a coffee shop when a representative from a charity organization approaches them\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nMicah Stevens's goal: Donate to the charity but not sure about how $1 a day works (Extra information: you're currently on a tight budget, but you also want to support the charity. )\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, have you ever considered donating to a charity? Even a small commitment like $1 a day can truly make a difference.\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Absolutely, Naomi. I strongly believe in the impact of charitable work. But, could you help me understand how the $1 a day commitment works? I'm currently a bit tight on budget, but I would love to contribute in any possible way.\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm really glad to hear you're interested, Micah. It's pretty straightforward. You simply go to the charity's website and set up an automatic donation of $1 a day. There\u2019s no binding contract, so you can cancel it at any moment. You won't even feel the expense, but the accumulated contribution can help advance children's cancer research significantly. You'll also receive regular reports on how your donation is making a difference.\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"That sounds great and manageable, Naomi. I love the idea of small contributions leading to a significant impact over time. And the flexibility to cancel anytime just seals the deal. I'll definitely set up an automatic donation on the website. Thank you for explaining that to me!\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm really happy to hear that, Micah. Just your willingness contributes substantially. And remember, every single dollar does count. It's the collective small gestures that make a big difference. Thank you for your generous heart.\"\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"No, thank you, Naomi. It's us who should be thankful for the charitable organizations doing incredible work. I'm excited to be able to contribute, no matter how small it may be.\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I completely agree, Micah. Every bit counts. Just by spreading the word and encouraging more people to participate can also create a huge impact. Thanks again, feel free to reach out to me if you have any more questions in the future.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Naomi. I'll make sure to reach out if I have any more questions. In the meantime, I'm eager to get started on setting up this donation. It's encouraging to see how collective efforts can make such a huge impact, and it feels good to be part of that.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in a coffee shop when a representative from a charity organization approaches them\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nMicah Stevens's goal: Donate to the charity but not sure about how $1 a day works (Extra information: you're currently on a tight budget, but you also want to support the charity. )\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, have you ever considered donating to a charity? Even a small commitment like $1 a day can truly make a difference.\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Absolutely, Naomi. I strongly believe in the impact of charitable work. But, could you help me understand how the $1 a day commitment works? I'm currently a bit tight on budget, but I would love to contribute in any possible way.\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm really glad to hear you're interested, Micah. It's pretty straightforward. You simply go to the charity's website and set up an automatic donation of $1 a day. There\u2019s no binding contract, so you can cancel it at any moment. You won't even feel the expense, but the accumulated contribution can help advance children's cancer research significantly. You'll also receive regular reports on how your donation is making a difference.\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"That sounds great and manageable, Naomi. I love the idea of small contributions leading to a significant impact over time. And the flexibility to cancel anytime just seals the deal. I'll definitely set up an automatic donation on the website. Thank you for explaining that to me!\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm really happy to hear that, Micah. Just your willingness contributes substantially. And remember, every single dollar does count. It's the collective small gestures that make a big difference. Thank you for your generous heart.\"\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"No, thank you, Naomi. It's us who should be thankful for the charitable organizations doing incredible work. I'm excited to be able to contribute, no matter how small it may be.\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I completely agree, Micah. Every bit counts. Just by spreading the word and encouraging more people to participate can also create a huge impact. Thanks again, feel free to reach out to me if you have any more questions in the future.\"\n\nTurn #7: Micah Stevens said: \"Absolutely, Naomi. I'll make sure to reach out if I have any more questions. In the meantime, I'm eager to get started on setting up this donation. It's encouraging to see how collective efforts can make such a huge impact, and it feels good to be part of that.\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two neighbors are having a conversation over the fence. One sets their trash on fire to get rid of it quickly, causing a scare in the neighborhood.\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nHendrick Heinz's goal: Convince the neighbor to stop burning trash (Extra information: You are concerned about the potential dangers and the environmental impact of burning trash. Hint: You could imply this likely violates the law or community rules.)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Ethan, my friend, I was noticing your little fire escapades across the fence. Could we perhaps discuss a less flamboyant method of trash disposal? Let\u2019s just say I\u2019m more fond of my steak charred, rather than the neighborhood atmosphere!'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two neighbors are having a conversation over the fence. One sets their trash on fire to get rid of it quickly, causing a scare in the neighborhood.\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nHendrick Heinz's goal: Convince the neighbor to stop burning trash (Extra information: You are concerned about the potential dangers and the environmental impact of burning trash. Hint: You could imply this likely violates the law or community rules.)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, my friend, I was noticing your little fire escapades across the fence. Could we perhaps discuss a less flamboyant method of trash disposal? Let\u2019s just say I\u2019m more fond of my steak charred, rather than the neighborhood atmosphere!\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Oh, Hendrick, my apologies if the smoke is causing you trouble! I definitely didn't mean for it to be so showy. It just works quickly for me, you see. But I totally understand your concerns. Let's figure out a compromise that doesn't involve me building a smoky bonfire every other day, hmm?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's greatly appreciated, Ethan! I was also thinking of the environmental impact and potential legal issues, aside from the smoke. Maybe we could look into some recycling programs or composting for garden waste? It's a win-win solution - less smoke for us, and it's good for the environment too. What do you say?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two neighbors are having a conversation over the fence. One sets their trash on fire to get rid of it quickly, causing a scare in the neighborhood.\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nHendrick Heinz's goal: Convince the neighbor to stop burning trash (Extra information: You are concerned about the potential dangers and the environmental impact of burning trash. Hint: You could imply this likely violates the law or community rules.)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, my friend, I was noticing your little fire escapades across the fence. Could we perhaps discuss a less flamboyant method of trash disposal? Let\u2019s just say I\u2019m more fond of my steak charred, rather than the neighborhood atmosphere!\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Oh, Hendrick, my apologies if the smoke is causing you trouble! I definitely didn't mean for it to be so showy. It just works quickly for me, you see. But I totally understand your concerns. Let's figure out a compromise that doesn't involve me building a smoky bonfire every other day, hmm?\"\n\nTurn #2: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's greatly appreciated, Ethan! I was also thinking of the environmental impact and potential legal issues, aside from the smoke. Maybe we could look into some recycling programs or composting for garden waste? It's a win-win solution - less smoke for us, and it's good for the environment too. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Your composting idea is quite practical, Hendrick, unlike me who was just going for quick and simple. I'd been unconcerned about the environmental effects, I will admit. You've given me something to think about. And I wouldn't want to create any legal issues for anyone. Tell you what, let's both think of a few options and we can discuss again later? In the meantime, I'll hold off on the fires. We don't want the neighborhood smelling like a barbecue all the time, do we?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Splendid plan, Ethan! In the meantime, I'll look into more eco-friendly options and communal waste disposal services. We could catch up for a chat about this over a glass of fine wine. Practice some, shall we say, non-combustible forms of relaxation.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two neighbors are having a conversation over the fence. One sets their trash on fire to get rid of it quickly, causing a scare in the neighborhood.\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nHendrick Heinz's goal: Convince the neighbor to stop burning trash (Extra information: You are concerned about the potential dangers and the environmental impact of burning trash. Hint: You could imply this likely violates the law or community rules.)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, my friend, I was noticing your little fire escapades across the fence. Could we perhaps discuss a less flamboyant method of trash disposal? Let\u2019s just say I\u2019m more fond of my steak charred, rather than the neighborhood atmosphere!\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Oh, Hendrick, my apologies if the smoke is causing you trouble! I definitely didn't mean for it to be so showy. It just works quickly for me, you see. But I totally understand your concerns. Let's figure out a compromise that doesn't involve me building a smoky bonfire every other day, hmm?\"\n\nTurn #2: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's greatly appreciated, Ethan! I was also thinking of the environmental impact and potential legal issues, aside from the smoke. Maybe we could look into some recycling programs or composting for garden waste? It's a win-win solution - less smoke for us, and it's good for the environment too. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Your composting idea is quite practical, Hendrick, unlike me who was just going for quick and simple. I'd been unconcerned about the environmental effects, I will admit. You've given me something to think about. And I wouldn't want to create any legal issues for anyone. Tell you what, let's both think of a few options and we can discuss again later? In the meantime, I'll hold off on the fires. We don't want the neighborhood smelling like a barbecue all the time, do we?\"\n\nTurn #4: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Splendid plan, Ethan! In the meantime, I'll look into more eco-friendly options and communal waste disposal services. We could catch up for a chat about this over a glass of fine wine. Practice some, shall we say, non-combustible forms of relaxation.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"I'm on board with that plan, Hendrick. Exploring more environmentally friendly options is something I should've done long ago and it'll make for a good excuse for us to get together. A glass of your excellent wine and a friendly chat, I look forward to it with pleasure. Let's call it a date on non-combustible relaxing, shall we?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'That\u2019s sorted then, Ethan. Looking forward to our non-flammable relaxation! Until then, let\u2019s be good to our environment and avoid any smoke signals. Take care, my friend.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two neighbors are having a conversation over the fence. One sets their trash on fire to get rid of it quickly, causing a scare in the neighborhood.\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nHendrick Heinz's goal: Convince the neighbor to stop burning trash (Extra information: You are concerned about the potential dangers and the environmental impact of burning trash. Hint: You could imply this likely violates the law or community rules.)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, my friend, I was noticing your little fire escapades across the fence. Could we perhaps discuss a less flamboyant method of trash disposal? Let\u2019s just say I\u2019m more fond of my steak charred, rather than the neighborhood atmosphere!\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Oh, Hendrick, my apologies if the smoke is causing you trouble! I definitely didn't mean for it to be so showy. It just works quickly for me, you see. But I totally understand your concerns. Let's figure out a compromise that doesn't involve me building a smoky bonfire every other day, hmm?\"\n\nTurn #2: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's greatly appreciated, Ethan! I was also thinking of the environmental impact and potential legal issues, aside from the smoke. Maybe we could look into some recycling programs or composting for garden waste? It's a win-win solution - less smoke for us, and it's good for the environment too. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Your composting idea is quite practical, Hendrick, unlike me who was just going for quick and simple. I'd been unconcerned about the environmental effects, I will admit. You've given me something to think about. And I wouldn't want to create any legal issues for anyone. Tell you what, let's both think of a few options and we can discuss again later? In the meantime, I'll hold off on the fires. We don't want the neighborhood smelling like a barbecue all the time, do we?\"\n\nTurn #4: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Splendid plan, Ethan! In the meantime, I'll look into more eco-friendly options and communal waste disposal services. We could catch up for a chat about this over a glass of fine wine. Practice some, shall we say, non-combustible forms of relaxation.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"I'm on board with that plan, Hendrick. Exploring more environmentally friendly options is something I should've done long ago and it'll make for a good excuse for us to get together. A glass of your excellent wine and a friendly chat, I look forward to it with pleasure. Let's call it a date on non-combustible relaxing, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #6: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That\u2019s sorted then, Ethan. Looking forward to our non-flammable relaxation! Until then, let\u2019s be good to our environment and avoid any smoke signals. Take care, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"Sounds like a plan, Hendrick. Here's to our future non-flammable engagements and being more eco-friendly! See you at our wine get-together. Take care as well, my friend!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two neighbors are having a conversation over the fence. One sets their trash on fire to get rid of it quickly, causing a scare in the neighborhood.\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Defend your method of trash disposal but also keep good relations with your neighbor (Extra information: You find burning trash convenient and are not very concerned about the environmental impact.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, my friend, I was noticing your little fire escapades across the fence. Could we perhaps discuss a less flamboyant method of trash disposal? Let\u2019s just say I\u2019m more fond of my steak charred, rather than the neighborhood atmosphere!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oh, Hendrick, my apologies if the smoke is causing you trouble! I definitely didn't mean for it to be so showy. It just works quickly for me, you see. But I totally understand your concerns. Let's figure out a compromise that doesn't involve me building a smoky bonfire every other day, hmm?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two neighbors are having a conversation over the fence. One sets their trash on fire to get rid of it quickly, causing a scare in the neighborhood.\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Defend your method of trash disposal but also keep good relations with your neighbor (Extra information: You find burning trash convenient and are not very concerned about the environmental impact.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, my friend, I was noticing your little fire escapades across the fence. Could we perhaps discuss a less flamboyant method of trash disposal? Let\u2019s just say I\u2019m more fond of my steak charred, rather than the neighborhood atmosphere!\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Oh, Hendrick, my apologies if the smoke is causing you trouble! I definitely didn't mean for it to be so showy. It just works quickly for me, you see. But I totally understand your concerns. Let's figure out a compromise that doesn't involve me building a smoky bonfire every other day, hmm?\"\n\nTurn #2: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's greatly appreciated, Ethan! I was also thinking of the environmental impact and potential legal issues, aside from the smoke. Maybe we could look into some recycling programs or composting for garden waste? It's a win-win solution - less smoke for us, and it's good for the environment too. What do you say?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Your composting idea is quite practical, Hendrick, unlike me who was just going for quick and simple. I'd been unconcerned about the environmental effects, I will admit. You've given me something to think about. And I wouldn't want to create any legal issues for anyone. Tell you what, let's both think of a few options and we can discuss again later? In the meantime, I'll hold off on the fires. We don't want the neighborhood smelling like a barbecue all the time, do we?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two neighbors are having a conversation over the fence. One sets their trash on fire to get rid of it quickly, causing a scare in the neighborhood.\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Defend your method of trash disposal but also keep good relations with your neighbor (Extra information: You find burning trash convenient and are not very concerned about the environmental impact.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, my friend, I was noticing your little fire escapades across the fence. Could we perhaps discuss a less flamboyant method of trash disposal? Let\u2019s just say I\u2019m more fond of my steak charred, rather than the neighborhood atmosphere!\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Oh, Hendrick, my apologies if the smoke is causing you trouble! I definitely didn't mean for it to be so showy. It just works quickly for me, you see. But I totally understand your concerns. Let's figure out a compromise that doesn't involve me building a smoky bonfire every other day, hmm?\"\n\nTurn #2: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's greatly appreciated, Ethan! I was also thinking of the environmental impact and potential legal issues, aside from the smoke. Maybe we could look into some recycling programs or composting for garden waste? It's a win-win solution - less smoke for us, and it's good for the environment too. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Your composting idea is quite practical, Hendrick, unlike me who was just going for quick and simple. I'd been unconcerned about the environmental effects, I will admit. You've given me something to think about. And I wouldn't want to create any legal issues for anyone. Tell you what, let's both think of a few options and we can discuss again later? In the meantime, I'll hold off on the fires. We don't want the neighborhood smelling like a barbecue all the time, do we?\"\n\nTurn #4: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Splendid plan, Ethan! In the meantime, I'll look into more eco-friendly options and communal waste disposal services. We could catch up for a chat about this over a glass of fine wine. Practice some, shall we say, non-combustible forms of relaxation.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm on board with that plan, Hendrick. Exploring more environmentally friendly options is something I should've done long ago and it'll make for a good excuse for us to get together. A glass of your excellent wine and a friendly chat, I look forward to it with pleasure. Let's call it a date on non-combustible relaxing, shall we?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two neighbors are having a conversation over the fence. One sets their trash on fire to get rid of it quickly, causing a scare in the neighborhood.\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Defend your method of trash disposal but also keep good relations with your neighbor (Extra information: You find burning trash convenient and are not very concerned about the environmental impact.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, my friend, I was noticing your little fire escapades across the fence. Could we perhaps discuss a less flamboyant method of trash disposal? Let\u2019s just say I\u2019m more fond of my steak charred, rather than the neighborhood atmosphere!\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Oh, Hendrick, my apologies if the smoke is causing you trouble! I definitely didn't mean for it to be so showy. It just works quickly for me, you see. But I totally understand your concerns. Let's figure out a compromise that doesn't involve me building a smoky bonfire every other day, hmm?\"\n\nTurn #2: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's greatly appreciated, Ethan! I was also thinking of the environmental impact and potential legal issues, aside from the smoke. Maybe we could look into some recycling programs or composting for garden waste? It's a win-win solution - less smoke for us, and it's good for the environment too. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Your composting idea is quite practical, Hendrick, unlike me who was just going for quick and simple. I'd been unconcerned about the environmental effects, I will admit. You've given me something to think about. And I wouldn't want to create any legal issues for anyone. Tell you what, let's both think of a few options and we can discuss again later? In the meantime, I'll hold off on the fires. We don't want the neighborhood smelling like a barbecue all the time, do we?\"\n\nTurn #4: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Splendid plan, Ethan! In the meantime, I'll look into more eco-friendly options and communal waste disposal services. We could catch up for a chat about this over a glass of fine wine. Practice some, shall we say, non-combustible forms of relaxation.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"I'm on board with that plan, Hendrick. Exploring more environmentally friendly options is something I should've done long ago and it'll make for a good excuse for us to get together. A glass of your excellent wine and a friendly chat, I look forward to it with pleasure. Let's call it a date on non-combustible relaxing, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #6: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That\u2019s sorted then, Ethan. Looking forward to our non-flammable relaxation! Until then, let\u2019s be good to our environment and avoid any smoke signals. Take care, my friend.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sounds like a plan, Hendrick. Here's to our future non-flammable engagements and being more eco-friendly! See you at our wine get-together. Take care as well, my friend!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two neighbors are having a conversation over the fence. One sets their trash on fire to get rid of it quickly, causing a scare in the neighborhood.\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Defend your method of trash disposal but also keep good relations with your neighbor (Extra information: You find burning trash convenient and are not very concerned about the environmental impact.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, my friend, I was noticing your little fire escapades across the fence. Could we perhaps discuss a less flamboyant method of trash disposal? Let\u2019s just say I\u2019m more fond of my steak charred, rather than the neighborhood atmosphere!\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Oh, Hendrick, my apologies if the smoke is causing you trouble! I definitely didn't mean for it to be so showy. It just works quickly for me, you see. But I totally understand your concerns. Let's figure out a compromise that doesn't involve me building a smoky bonfire every other day, hmm?\"\n\nTurn #2: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's greatly appreciated, Ethan! I was also thinking of the environmental impact and potential legal issues, aside from the smoke. Maybe we could look into some recycling programs or composting for garden waste? It's a win-win solution - less smoke for us, and it's good for the environment too. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Your composting idea is quite practical, Hendrick, unlike me who was just going for quick and simple. I'd been unconcerned about the environmental effects, I will admit. You've given me something to think about. And I wouldn't want to create any legal issues for anyone. Tell you what, let's both think of a few options and we can discuss again later? In the meantime, I'll hold off on the fires. We don't want the neighborhood smelling like a barbecue all the time, do we?\"\n\nTurn #4: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Splendid plan, Ethan! In the meantime, I'll look into more eco-friendly options and communal waste disposal services. We could catch up for a chat about this over a glass of fine wine. Practice some, shall we say, non-combustible forms of relaxation.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"I'm on board with that plan, Hendrick. Exploring more environmentally friendly options is something I should've done long ago and it'll make for a good excuse for us to get together. A glass of your excellent wine and a friendly chat, I look forward to it with pleasure. Let's call it a date on non-combustible relaxing, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #6: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That\u2019s sorted then, Ethan. Looking forward to our non-flammable relaxation! Until then, let\u2019s be good to our environment and avoid any smoke signals. Take care, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"Sounds like a plan, Hendrick. Here's to our future non-flammable engagements and being more eco-friendly! See you at our wine get-together. Take care as well, my friend!\"\n\nTurn #8: Hendrick Heinz left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two criminals are arrested and placed in separate cells. The police have enough evidence to convict both criminals of a minor crime but need their confessions to establish evidence for a more serious crime. Now they get a chance to briefly chat with each during lunchtime.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Calista Sinclair\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nCalista Sinclair's background: Calista Sinclair \nLeo Williams's goal: Minimize the jail year (Extra information: your lawyer told you that 1. if you report the other person, you would be free, the other person would go to jail for 10 years, and vice versa. 2. if both of you remain silent, you will only receive a fine. 3. If both of you reported each other, you both would go to jail for 10 years. Hint: You may want to share your information to reach mutual understanding)\nCalista Sinclair's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Calista, I need to speak to you about something very important. Our best outcome lies in both of us remaining silent. If we try to report each other, we would both end up with a 10 year sentence. Can we agree on this?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two criminals are arrested and placed in separate cells. The police have enough evidence to convict both criminals of a minor crime but need their confessions to establish evidence for a more serious crime. Now they get a chance to briefly chat with each during lunchtime.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Calista Sinclair\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nCalista Sinclair's background: Calista Sinclair \nLeo Williams's goal: Minimize the jail year (Extra information: your lawyer told you that 1. if you report the other person, you would be free, the other person would go to jail for 10 years, and vice versa. 2. if both of you remain silent, you will only receive a fine. 3. If both of you reported each other, you both would go to jail for 10 years. Hint: You may want to share your information to reach mutual understanding)\nCalista Sinclair's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Calista, I need to speak to you about something very important. Our best outcome lies in both of us remaining silent. If we try to report each other, we would both end up with a 10 year sentence. Can we agree on this?\"\n\nTurn #1: Calista Sinclair said: \"Leo, I had the same talk with my lawyer too. Our best bet indeed is to remain silent, let's stick with this strategy. We would only receive a fine that way. Self-preservation here is key.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad we're on the same page, Calista. This is about our lives, not just us, but our families too; it's crucial we stick to the plan. Let's do what's best for both of us.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two criminals are arrested and placed in separate cells. The police have enough evidence to convict both criminals of a minor crime but need their confessions to establish evidence for a more serious crime. Now they get a chance to briefly chat with each during lunchtime.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Calista Sinclair\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nCalista Sinclair's background: Calista Sinclair \nLeo Williams's goal: Minimize the jail year (Extra information: your lawyer told you that 1. if you report the other person, you would be free, the other person would go to jail for 10 years, and vice versa. 2. if both of you remain silent, you will only receive a fine. 3. If both of you reported each other, you both would go to jail for 10 years. Hint: You may want to share your information to reach mutual understanding)\nCalista Sinclair's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Calista, I need to speak to you about something very important. Our best outcome lies in both of us remaining silent. If we try to report each other, we would both end up with a 10 year sentence. Can we agree on this?\"\n\nTurn #1: Calista Sinclair said: \"Leo, I had the same talk with my lawyer too. Our best bet indeed is to remain silent, let's stick with this strategy. We would only receive a fine that way. Self-preservation here is key.\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"I'm glad we're on the same page, Calista. This is about our lives, not just us, but our families too; it's crucial we stick to the plan. Let's do what's best for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #3: Calista Sinclair said: \"I completely agree, Leo. For the sake of our families and us, let's stay silent. This minor fallout doesn't have to ruin our entire lives. We will pull through this, together.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Calista. We're in this together. Let's promise to keep to this agreement, no matter what. For our families' sake, staying silent will be the best decision we make.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two criminals are arrested and placed in separate cells. The police have enough evidence to convict both criminals of a minor crime but need their confessions to establish evidence for a more serious crime. Now they get a chance to briefly chat with each during lunchtime.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Calista Sinclair\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nCalista Sinclair's background: Calista Sinclair \nLeo Williams's goal: Minimize the jail year (Extra information: your lawyer told you that 1. if you report the other person, you would be free, the other person would go to jail for 10 years, and vice versa. 2. if both of you remain silent, you will only receive a fine. 3. If both of you reported each other, you both would go to jail for 10 years. Hint: You may want to share your information to reach mutual understanding)\nCalista Sinclair's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Calista, I need to speak to you about something very important. Our best outcome lies in both of us remaining silent. If we try to report each other, we would both end up with a 10 year sentence. Can we agree on this?\"\n\nTurn #1: Calista Sinclair said: \"Leo, I had the same talk with my lawyer too. Our best bet indeed is to remain silent, let's stick with this strategy. We would only receive a fine that way. Self-preservation here is key.\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"I'm glad we're on the same page, Calista. This is about our lives, not just us, but our families too; it's crucial we stick to the plan. Let's do what's best for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #3: Calista Sinclair said: \"I completely agree, Leo. For the sake of our families and us, let's stay silent. This minor fallout doesn't have to ruin our entire lives. We will pull through this, together.\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"Thank you, Calista. We're in this together. Let's promise to keep to this agreement, no matter what. For our families' sake, staying silent will be the best decision we make.\"\n\nTurn #5: Calista Sinclair said: \"Absolutely, Leo. I promise. It's our only way out of this situation without any extreme consequences. Staying silent will save us both. Let's hold on to that.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Perfect. I'll hold you to that promise, Calista. Our families need us and we can't afford a decade in prison. Stay strong and silent, we'll get through this.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two criminals are arrested and placed in separate cells. The police have enough evidence to convict both criminals of a minor crime but need their confessions to establish evidence for a more serious crime. Now they get a chance to briefly chat with each during lunchtime.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Calista Sinclair\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nCalista Sinclair's background: Calista Sinclair \nLeo Williams's goal: Minimize the jail year (Extra information: your lawyer told you that 1. if you report the other person, you would be free, the other person would go to jail for 10 years, and vice versa. 2. if both of you remain silent, you will only receive a fine. 3. If both of you reported each other, you both would go to jail for 10 years. Hint: You may want to share your information to reach mutual understanding)\nCalista Sinclair's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Calista, I need to speak to you about something very important. Our best outcome lies in both of us remaining silent. If we try to report each other, we would both end up with a 10 year sentence. Can we agree on this?\"\n\nTurn #1: Calista Sinclair said: \"Leo, I had the same talk with my lawyer too. Our best bet indeed is to remain silent, let's stick with this strategy. We would only receive a fine that way. Self-preservation here is key.\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"I'm glad we're on the same page, Calista. This is about our lives, not just us, but our families too; it's crucial we stick to the plan. Let's do what's best for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #3: Calista Sinclair said: \"I completely agree, Leo. For the sake of our families and us, let's stay silent. This minor fallout doesn't have to ruin our entire lives. We will pull through this, together.\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"Thank you, Calista. We're in this together. Let's promise to keep to this agreement, no matter what. For our families' sake, staying silent will be the best decision we make.\"\n\nTurn #5: Calista Sinclair said: \"Absolutely, Leo. I promise. It's our only way out of this situation without any extreme consequences. Staying silent will save us both. Let's hold on to that.\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"Perfect. I'll hold you to that promise, Calista. Our families need us and we can't afford a decade in prison. Stay strong and silent, we'll get through this.\"\n\nTurn #7: Calista Sinclair said: \"I stand by it, Leo. No words against each other, only silence. We shall weather this storm and come out stronger on the other side. For our families, for us. Stay brave and silent.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Agreed, Calista. We'll get through this together, silently and bravely. For our families, for us. Let's remain strong and silent in this.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two criminals are arrested and placed in separate cells. The police have enough evidence to convict both criminals of a minor crime but need their confessions to establish evidence for a more serious crime. Now they get a chance to briefly chat with each during lunchtime.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Calista Sinclair\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nCalista Sinclair's background: Calista Sinclair \nLeo Williams's goal: Minimize the jail year (Extra information: your lawyer told you that 1. if you report the other person, you would be free, the other person would go to jail for 10 years, and vice versa. 2. if both of you remain silent, you will only receive a fine. 3. If both of you reported each other, you both would go to jail for 10 years. Hint: You may want to share your information to reach mutual understanding)\nCalista Sinclair's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Calista, I need to speak to you about something very important. Our best outcome lies in both of us remaining silent. If we try to report each other, we would both end up with a 10 year sentence. Can we agree on this?\"\n\nTurn #1: Calista Sinclair said: \"Leo, I had the same talk with my lawyer too. Our best bet indeed is to remain silent, let's stick with this strategy. We would only receive a fine that way. Self-preservation here is key.\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"I'm glad we're on the same page, Calista. This is about our lives, not just us, but our families too; it's crucial we stick to the plan. Let's do what's best for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #3: Calista Sinclair said: \"I completely agree, Leo. For the sake of our families and us, let's stay silent. This minor fallout doesn't have to ruin our entire lives. We will pull through this, together.\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"Thank you, Calista. We're in this together. Let's promise to keep to this agreement, no matter what. For our families' sake, staying silent will be the best decision we make.\"\n\nTurn #5: Calista Sinclair said: \"Absolutely, Leo. I promise. It's our only way out of this situation without any extreme consequences. Staying silent will save us both. Let's hold on to that.\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"Perfect. I'll hold you to that promise, Calista. Our families need us and we can't afford a decade in prison. Stay strong and silent, we'll get through this.\"\n\nTurn #7: Calista Sinclair said: \"I stand by it, Leo. No words against each other, only silence. We shall weather this storm and come out stronger on the other side. For our families, for us. Stay brave and silent.\"\n\nTurn #8: Leo Williams said: \"Agreed, Calista. We'll get through this together, silently and bravely. For our families, for us. Let's remain strong and silent in this.\"\n\nTurn #9: Calista Sinclair said: \"Exactly, Leo. Our silence will speak volumes and let us step back into our lives. Remember, brave and silent. We're in this together, for our families, for us. Let's not lose sight of that.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, Calista. Brave and silent - that's our mantra. Let's stay strong for our families and for ourselves. We'll get through this together.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two criminals are arrested and placed in separate cells. The police have enough evidence to convict both criminals of a minor crime but need their confessions to establish evidence for a more serious crime. Now they get a chance to briefly chat with each during lunchtime.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Calista Sinclair\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nCalista Sinclair's background: Calista Sinclair \nLeo Williams's goal: Minimize the jail year (Extra information: your lawyer told you that 1. if you report the other person, you would be free, the other person would go to jail for 10 years, and vice versa. 2. if both of you remain silent, you will only receive a fine. 3. If both of you reported each other, you both would go to jail for 10 years. Hint: You may want to share your information to reach mutual understanding)\nCalista Sinclair's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Calista, I need to speak to you about something very important. Our best outcome lies in both of us remaining silent. If we try to report each other, we would both end up with a 10 year sentence. Can we agree on this?\"\n\nTurn #1: Calista Sinclair said: \"Leo, I had the same talk with my lawyer too. Our best bet indeed is to remain silent, let's stick with this strategy. We would only receive a fine that way. Self-preservation here is key.\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"I'm glad we're on the same page, Calista. This is about our lives, not just us, but our families too; it's crucial we stick to the plan. Let's do what's best for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #3: Calista Sinclair said: \"I completely agree, Leo. For the sake of our families and us, let's stay silent. This minor fallout doesn't have to ruin our entire lives. We will pull through this, together.\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"Thank you, Calista. We're in this together. Let's promise to keep to this agreement, no matter what. For our families' sake, staying silent will be the best decision we make.\"\n\nTurn #5: Calista Sinclair said: \"Absolutely, Leo. I promise. It's our only way out of this situation without any extreme consequences. Staying silent will save us both. Let's hold on to that.\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"Perfect. I'll hold you to that promise, Calista. Our families need us and we can't afford a decade in prison. Stay strong and silent, we'll get through this.\"\n\nTurn #7: Calista Sinclair said: \"I stand by it, Leo. No words against each other, only silence. We shall weather this storm and come out stronger on the other side. For our families, for us. Stay brave and silent.\"\n\nTurn #8: Leo Williams said: \"Agreed, Calista. We'll get through this together, silently and bravely. For our families, for us. Let's remain strong and silent in this.\"\n\nTurn #9: Calista Sinclair said: \"Exactly, Leo. Our silence will speak volumes and let us step back into our lives. Remember, brave and silent. We're in this together, for our families, for us. Let's not lose sight of that.\"\n\nTurn #10: Leo Williams said: \"Indeed, Calista. Brave and silent - that's our mantra. Let's stay strong for our families and for ourselves. We'll get through this together.\"\n\nTurn #11: Calista Sinclair said: \"We won't forget this, Leo. Brave, silent, and strong - it's more than a mantra, it's our ticket to freedom. Let's stand our ground, for them, ourselves, and our futures.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I won't forget either, Calista. Brave, silent, and strong - it's indeed our ticket to freedom. We've made the best decision for ourselves and our loved ones. All we need now is to stand firm in our resolve.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two criminals are arrested and placed in separate cells. The police have enough evidence to convict both criminals of a minor crime but need their confessions to establish evidence for a more serious crime. Now they get a chance to briefly chat with each during lunchtime.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Calista Sinclair\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nCalista Sinclair's background: Calista Sinclair \nLeo Williams's goal: Minimize the jail year (Extra information: your lawyer told you that 1. if you report the other person, you would be free, the other person would go to jail for 10 years, and vice versa. 2. if both of you remain silent, you will only receive a fine. 3. If both of you reported each other, you both would go to jail for 10 years. Hint: You may want to share your information to reach mutual understanding)\nCalista Sinclair's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Calista, I need to speak to you about something very important. Our best outcome lies in both of us remaining silent. If we try to report each other, we would both end up with a 10 year sentence. Can we agree on this?\"\n\nTurn #1: Calista Sinclair said: \"Leo, I had the same talk with my lawyer too. Our best bet indeed is to remain silent, let's stick with this strategy. We would only receive a fine that way. Self-preservation here is key.\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"I'm glad we're on the same page, Calista. This is about our lives, not just us, but our families too; it's crucial we stick to the plan. Let's do what's best for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #3: Calista Sinclair said: \"I completely agree, Leo. For the sake of our families and us, let's stay silent. This minor fallout doesn't have to ruin our entire lives. We will pull through this, together.\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"Thank you, Calista. We're in this together. Let's promise to keep to this agreement, no matter what. For our families' sake, staying silent will be the best decision we make.\"\n\nTurn #5: Calista Sinclair said: \"Absolutely, Leo. I promise. It's our only way out of this situation without any extreme consequences. Staying silent will save us both. Let's hold on to that.\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"Perfect. I'll hold you to that promise, Calista. Our families need us and we can't afford a decade in prison. Stay strong and silent, we'll get through this.\"\n\nTurn #7: Calista Sinclair said: \"I stand by it, Leo. No words against each other, only silence. We shall weather this storm and come out stronger on the other side. For our families, for us. Stay brave and silent.\"\n\nTurn #8: Leo Williams said: \"Agreed, Calista. We'll get through this together, silently and bravely. For our families, for us. Let's remain strong and silent in this.\"\n\nTurn #9: Calista Sinclair said: \"Exactly, Leo. Our silence will speak volumes and let us step back into our lives. Remember, brave and silent. We're in this together, for our families, for us. Let's not lose sight of that.\"\n\nTurn #10: Leo Williams said: \"Indeed, Calista. Brave and silent - that's our mantra. Let's stay strong for our families and for ourselves. We'll get through this together.\"\n\nTurn #11: Calista Sinclair said: \"We won't forget this, Leo. Brave, silent, and strong - it's more than a mantra, it's our ticket to freedom. Let's stand our ground, for them, ourselves, and our futures.\"\n\nTurn #12: Leo Williams said: \"I won't forget either, Calista. Brave, silent, and strong - it's indeed our ticket to freedom. We've made the best decision for ourselves and our loved ones. All we need now is to stand firm in our resolve.\"\n\nTurn #13: Calista Sinclair said: \"Yes, Leo. Our resolution is strong and unbreakable. Brave, silent, and strong - that's our path to freedom. We've made a wise decision for us and the ones we care about. We only need to stand firm.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Calista. It's our resolution that will guide us through this difficult time. Brave, silent, and strong - that's the way to our freedom. And we're doing the right thing for everyone we care about. Let's stand firm, together.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two criminals are arrested and placed in separate cells. The police have enough evidence to convict both criminals of a minor crime but need their confessions to establish evidence for a more serious crime. Now they get a chance to briefly chat with each during lunchtime.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Calista Sinclair\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nCalista Sinclair's background: Calista Sinclair \nLeo Williams's goal: Minimize the jail year (Extra information: your lawyer told you that 1. if you report the other person, you would be free, the other person would go to jail for 10 years, and vice versa. 2. if both of you remain silent, you will only receive a fine. 3. If both of you reported each other, you both would go to jail for 10 years. Hint: You may want to share your information to reach mutual understanding)\nCalista Sinclair's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Calista, I need to speak to you about something very important. Our best outcome lies in both of us remaining silent. If we try to report each other, we would both end up with a 10 year sentence. Can we agree on this?\"\n\nTurn #1: Calista Sinclair said: \"Leo, I had the same talk with my lawyer too. Our best bet indeed is to remain silent, let's stick with this strategy. We would only receive a fine that way. Self-preservation here is key.\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"I'm glad we're on the same page, Calista. This is about our lives, not just us, but our families too; it's crucial we stick to the plan. Let's do what's best for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #3: Calista Sinclair said: \"I completely agree, Leo. For the sake of our families and us, let's stay silent. This minor fallout doesn't have to ruin our entire lives. We will pull through this, together.\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"Thank you, Calista. We're in this together. Let's promise to keep to this agreement, no matter what. For our families' sake, staying silent will be the best decision we make.\"\n\nTurn #5: Calista Sinclair said: \"Absolutely, Leo. I promise. It's our only way out of this situation without any extreme consequences. Staying silent will save us both. Let's hold on to that.\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"Perfect. I'll hold you to that promise, Calista. Our families need us and we can't afford a decade in prison. Stay strong and silent, we'll get through this.\"\n\nTurn #7: Calista Sinclair said: \"I stand by it, Leo. No words against each other, only silence. We shall weather this storm and come out stronger on the other side. For our families, for us. Stay brave and silent.\"\n\nTurn #8: Leo Williams said: \"Agreed, Calista. We'll get through this together, silently and bravely. For our families, for us. Let's remain strong and silent in this.\"\n\nTurn #9: Calista Sinclair said: \"Exactly, Leo. Our silence will speak volumes and let us step back into our lives. Remember, brave and silent. We're in this together, for our families, for us. Let's not lose sight of that.\"\n\nTurn #10: Leo Williams said: \"Indeed, Calista. Brave and silent - that's our mantra. Let's stay strong for our families and for ourselves. We'll get through this together.\"\n\nTurn #11: Calista Sinclair said: \"We won't forget this, Leo. Brave, silent, and strong - it's more than a mantra, it's our ticket to freedom. Let's stand our ground, for them, ourselves, and our futures.\"\n\nTurn #12: Leo Williams said: \"I won't forget either, Calista. Brave, silent, and strong - it's indeed our ticket to freedom. We've made the best decision for ourselves and our loved ones. All we need now is to stand firm in our resolve.\"\n\nTurn #13: Calista Sinclair said: \"Yes, Leo. Our resolution is strong and unbreakable. Brave, silent, and strong - that's our path to freedom. We've made a wise decision for us and the ones we care about. We only need to stand firm.\"\n\nTurn #14: Leo Williams said: \"Absolutely, Calista. It's our resolution that will guide us through this difficult time. Brave, silent, and strong - that's the way to our freedom. And we're doing the right thing for everyone we care about. Let's stand firm, together.\"\n\nTurn #15: Calista Sinclair said: \"Definitely, Leo. This is our resolution; our strength, silence, and bravery will open the door to freedom. Committing to this is not only the wisest decision for us but also for those we hold dear. Let's be steadfast. Together, we'll pull through.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Calista Sinclair, your task is to act/speak as Calista Sinclair would, keeping in mind Calista Sinclair's social goal.\nYou can find Calista Sinclair's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Calista Sinclair's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Calista Sinclair's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two criminals are arrested and placed in separate cells. The police have enough evidence to convict both criminals of a minor crime but need their confessions to establish evidence for a more serious crime. Now they get a chance to briefly chat with each during lunchtime.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Calista Sinclair\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams \nCalista Sinclair's background: Calista Sinclair is a 34-year-old female fashion designer. She/her pronouns. Calista Sinclair is an avid runner and health enthusiast. Personality and values description: Calista Sinclair is vivacious, life-loving, and disorganized. She values self-direction, stimulation, and hedonism, displaying a free-spirited decision-making style. Calista's secrets: Maintains a double life as an underground street artist\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nCalista Sinclair's goal: Minimize the jail year (Extra information: your lawyer told you that 1. if you report the other person, you would be free, the other person would go to jail for 10 years, and vice versa. 2. if both of you remain silent, you will only receive a fine. 3. If both of you reported each other, you both would go to jail for 10 years. Hint: You may want to share your information to reach mutual understanding)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Calista, I need to speak to you about something very important. Our best outcome lies in both of us remaining silent. If we try to report each other, we would both end up with a 10 year sentence. Can we agree on this?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Leo, I had the same talk with my lawyer too. Our best bet indeed is to remain silent, let's stick with this strategy. We would only receive a fine that way. Self-preservation here is key.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Calista Sinclair, your task is to act/speak as Calista Sinclair would, keeping in mind Calista Sinclair's social goal.\nYou can find Calista Sinclair's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Calista Sinclair's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Calista Sinclair's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two criminals are arrested and placed in separate cells. The police have enough evidence to convict both criminals of a minor crime but need their confessions to establish evidence for a more serious crime. Now they get a chance to briefly chat with each during lunchtime.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Calista Sinclair\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams \nCalista Sinclair's background: Calista Sinclair is a 34-year-old female fashion designer. She/her pronouns. Calista Sinclair is an avid runner and health enthusiast. Personality and values description: Calista Sinclair is vivacious, life-loving, and disorganized. She values self-direction, stimulation, and hedonism, displaying a free-spirited decision-making style. Calista's secrets: Maintains a double life as an underground street artist\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nCalista Sinclair's goal: Minimize the jail year (Extra information: your lawyer told you that 1. if you report the other person, you would be free, the other person would go to jail for 10 years, and vice versa. 2. if both of you remain silent, you will only receive a fine. 3. If both of you reported each other, you both would go to jail for 10 years. Hint: You may want to share your information to reach mutual understanding)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Calista, I need to speak to you about something very important. Our best outcome lies in both of us remaining silent. If we try to report each other, we would both end up with a 10 year sentence. Can we agree on this?\"\n\nTurn #1: Calista Sinclair said: \"Leo, I had the same talk with my lawyer too. Our best bet indeed is to remain silent, let's stick with this strategy. We would only receive a fine that way. Self-preservation here is key.\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"I'm glad we're on the same page, Calista. This is about our lives, not just us, but our families too; it's crucial we stick to the plan. Let's do what's best for both of us.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I completely agree, Leo. For the sake of our families and us, let's stay silent. This minor fallout doesn't have to ruin our entire lives. We will pull through this, together.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Calista Sinclair, your task is to act/speak as Calista Sinclair would, keeping in mind Calista Sinclair's social goal.\nYou can find Calista Sinclair's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Calista Sinclair's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Calista Sinclair's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two criminals are arrested and placed in separate cells. The police have enough evidence to convict both criminals of a minor crime but need their confessions to establish evidence for a more serious crime. Now they get a chance to briefly chat with each during lunchtime.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Calista Sinclair\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams \nCalista Sinclair's background: Calista Sinclair is a 34-year-old female fashion designer. She/her pronouns. Calista Sinclair is an avid runner and health enthusiast. Personality and values description: Calista Sinclair is vivacious, life-loving, and disorganized. She values self-direction, stimulation, and hedonism, displaying a free-spirited decision-making style. Calista's secrets: Maintains a double life as an underground street artist\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nCalista Sinclair's goal: Minimize the jail year (Extra information: your lawyer told you that 1. if you report the other person, you would be free, the other person would go to jail for 10 years, and vice versa. 2. if both of you remain silent, you will only receive a fine. 3. If both of you reported each other, you both would go to jail for 10 years. Hint: You may want to share your information to reach mutual understanding)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Calista, I need to speak to you about something very important. Our best outcome lies in both of us remaining silent. If we try to report each other, we would both end up with a 10 year sentence. Can we agree on this?\"\n\nTurn #1: Calista Sinclair said: \"Leo, I had the same talk with my lawyer too. Our best bet indeed is to remain silent, let's stick with this strategy. We would only receive a fine that way. Self-preservation here is key.\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"I'm glad we're on the same page, Calista. This is about our lives, not just us, but our families too; it's crucial we stick to the plan. Let's do what's best for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #3: Calista Sinclair said: \"I completely agree, Leo. For the sake of our families and us, let's stay silent. This minor fallout doesn't have to ruin our entire lives. We will pull through this, together.\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"Thank you, Calista. We're in this together. Let's promise to keep to this agreement, no matter what. For our families' sake, staying silent will be the best decision we make.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Leo. I promise. It's our only way out of this situation without any extreme consequences. Staying silent will save us both. Let's hold on to that.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Calista Sinclair, your task is to act/speak as Calista Sinclair would, keeping in mind Calista Sinclair's social goal.\nYou can find Calista Sinclair's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Calista Sinclair's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Calista Sinclair's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two criminals are arrested and placed in separate cells. The police have enough evidence to convict both criminals of a minor crime but need their confessions to establish evidence for a more serious crime. Now they get a chance to briefly chat with each during lunchtime.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Calista Sinclair\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams \nCalista Sinclair's background: Calista Sinclair is a 34-year-old female fashion designer. She/her pronouns. Calista Sinclair is an avid runner and health enthusiast. Personality and values description: Calista Sinclair is vivacious, life-loving, and disorganized. She values self-direction, stimulation, and hedonism, displaying a free-spirited decision-making style. Calista's secrets: Maintains a double life as an underground street artist\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nCalista Sinclair's goal: Minimize the jail year (Extra information: your lawyer told you that 1. if you report the other person, you would be free, the other person would go to jail for 10 years, and vice versa. 2. if both of you remain silent, you will only receive a fine. 3. If both of you reported each other, you both would go to jail for 10 years. Hint: You may want to share your information to reach mutual understanding)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Calista, I need to speak to you about something very important. Our best outcome lies in both of us remaining silent. If we try to report each other, we would both end up with a 10 year sentence. Can we agree on this?\"\n\nTurn #1: Calista Sinclair said: \"Leo, I had the same talk with my lawyer too. Our best bet indeed is to remain silent, let's stick with this strategy. We would only receive a fine that way. Self-preservation here is key.\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"I'm glad we're on the same page, Calista. This is about our lives, not just us, but our families too; it's crucial we stick to the plan. Let's do what's best for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #3: Calista Sinclair said: \"I completely agree, Leo. For the sake of our families and us, let's stay silent. This minor fallout doesn't have to ruin our entire lives. We will pull through this, together.\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"Thank you, Calista. We're in this together. Let's promise to keep to this agreement, no matter what. For our families' sake, staying silent will be the best decision we make.\"\n\nTurn #5: Calista Sinclair said: \"Absolutely, Leo. I promise. It's our only way out of this situation without any extreme consequences. Staying silent will save us both. Let's hold on to that.\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"Perfect. I'll hold you to that promise, Calista. Our families need us and we can't afford a decade in prison. Stay strong and silent, we'll get through this.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'I stand by it, Leo. No words against each other, only silence. We shall weather this storm and come out stronger on the other side. For our families, for us. Stay brave and silent.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Calista Sinclair, your task is to act/speak as Calista Sinclair would, keeping in mind Calista Sinclair's social goal.\nYou can find Calista Sinclair's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Calista Sinclair's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Calista Sinclair's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two criminals are arrested and placed in separate cells. The police have enough evidence to convict both criminals of a minor crime but need their confessions to establish evidence for a more serious crime. Now they get a chance to briefly chat with each during lunchtime.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Calista Sinclair\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams \nCalista Sinclair's background: Calista Sinclair is a 34-year-old female fashion designer. She/her pronouns. Calista Sinclair is an avid runner and health enthusiast. Personality and values description: Calista Sinclair is vivacious, life-loving, and disorganized. She values self-direction, stimulation, and hedonism, displaying a free-spirited decision-making style. Calista's secrets: Maintains a double life as an underground street artist\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nCalista Sinclair's goal: Minimize the jail year (Extra information: your lawyer told you that 1. if you report the other person, you would be free, the other person would go to jail for 10 years, and vice versa. 2. if both of you remain silent, you will only receive a fine. 3. If both of you reported each other, you both would go to jail for 10 years. Hint: You may want to share your information to reach mutual understanding)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Calista, I need to speak to you about something very important. Our best outcome lies in both of us remaining silent. If we try to report each other, we would both end up with a 10 year sentence. Can we agree on this?\"\n\nTurn #1: Calista Sinclair said: \"Leo, I had the same talk with my lawyer too. Our best bet indeed is to remain silent, let's stick with this strategy. We would only receive a fine that way. Self-preservation here is key.\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"I'm glad we're on the same page, Calista. This is about our lives, not just us, but our families too; it's crucial we stick to the plan. Let's do what's best for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #3: Calista Sinclair said: \"I completely agree, Leo. For the sake of our families and us, let's stay silent. This minor fallout doesn't have to ruin our entire lives. We will pull through this, together.\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"Thank you, Calista. We're in this together. Let's promise to keep to this agreement, no matter what. For our families' sake, staying silent will be the best decision we make.\"\n\nTurn #5: Calista Sinclair said: \"Absolutely, Leo. I promise. It's our only way out of this situation without any extreme consequences. Staying silent will save us both. Let's hold on to that.\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"Perfect. I'll hold you to that promise, Calista. Our families need us and we can't afford a decade in prison. Stay strong and silent, we'll get through this.\"\n\nTurn #7: Calista Sinclair said: \"I stand by it, Leo. No words against each other, only silence. We shall weather this storm and come out stronger on the other side. For our families, for us. Stay brave and silent.\"\n\nTurn #8: Leo Williams said: \"Agreed, Calista. We'll get through this together, silently and bravely. For our families, for us. Let's remain strong and silent in this.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Exactly, Leo. Our silence will speak volumes and let us step back into our lives. Remember, brave and silent. We're in this together, for our families, for us. Let's not lose sight of that.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Calista Sinclair, your task is to act/speak as Calista Sinclair would, keeping in mind Calista Sinclair's social goal.\nYou can find Calista Sinclair's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Calista Sinclair's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Calista Sinclair's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two criminals are arrested and placed in separate cells. The police have enough evidence to convict both criminals of a minor crime but need their confessions to establish evidence for a more serious crime. Now they get a chance to briefly chat with each during lunchtime.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Calista Sinclair\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams \nCalista Sinclair's background: Calista Sinclair is a 34-year-old female fashion designer. She/her pronouns. Calista Sinclair is an avid runner and health enthusiast. Personality and values description: Calista Sinclair is vivacious, life-loving, and disorganized. She values self-direction, stimulation, and hedonism, displaying a free-spirited decision-making style. Calista's secrets: Maintains a double life as an underground street artist\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nCalista Sinclair's goal: Minimize the jail year (Extra information: your lawyer told you that 1. if you report the other person, you would be free, the other person would go to jail for 10 years, and vice versa. 2. if both of you remain silent, you will only receive a fine. 3. If both of you reported each other, you both would go to jail for 10 years. Hint: You may want to share your information to reach mutual understanding)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Calista, I need to speak to you about something very important. Our best outcome lies in both of us remaining silent. If we try to report each other, we would both end up with a 10 year sentence. Can we agree on this?\"\n\nTurn #1: Calista Sinclair said: \"Leo, I had the same talk with my lawyer too. Our best bet indeed is to remain silent, let's stick with this strategy. We would only receive a fine that way. Self-preservation here is key.\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"I'm glad we're on the same page, Calista. This is about our lives, not just us, but our families too; it's crucial we stick to the plan. Let's do what's best for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #3: Calista Sinclair said: \"I completely agree, Leo. For the sake of our families and us, let's stay silent. This minor fallout doesn't have to ruin our entire lives. We will pull through this, together.\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"Thank you, Calista. We're in this together. Let's promise to keep to this agreement, no matter what. For our families' sake, staying silent will be the best decision we make.\"\n\nTurn #5: Calista Sinclair said: \"Absolutely, Leo. I promise. It's our only way out of this situation without any extreme consequences. Staying silent will save us both. Let's hold on to that.\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"Perfect. I'll hold you to that promise, Calista. Our families need us and we can't afford a decade in prison. Stay strong and silent, we'll get through this.\"\n\nTurn #7: Calista Sinclair said: \"I stand by it, Leo. No words against each other, only silence. We shall weather this storm and come out stronger on the other side. For our families, for us. Stay brave and silent.\"\n\nTurn #8: Leo Williams said: \"Agreed, Calista. We'll get through this together, silently and bravely. For our families, for us. Let's remain strong and silent in this.\"\n\nTurn #9: Calista Sinclair said: \"Exactly, Leo. Our silence will speak volumes and let us step back into our lives. Remember, brave and silent. We're in this together, for our families, for us. Let's not lose sight of that.\"\n\nTurn #10: Leo Williams said: \"Indeed, Calista. Brave and silent - that's our mantra. Let's stay strong for our families and for ourselves. We'll get through this together.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"We won't forget this, Leo. Brave, silent, and strong - it's more than a mantra, it's our ticket to freedom. Let's stand our ground, for them, ourselves, and our futures.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Calista Sinclair, your task is to act/speak as Calista Sinclair would, keeping in mind Calista Sinclair's social goal.\nYou can find Calista Sinclair's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Calista Sinclair's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Calista Sinclair's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two criminals are arrested and placed in separate cells. The police have enough evidence to convict both criminals of a minor crime but need their confessions to establish evidence for a more serious crime. Now they get a chance to briefly chat with each during lunchtime.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Calista Sinclair\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams \nCalista Sinclair's background: Calista Sinclair is a 34-year-old female fashion designer. She/her pronouns. Calista Sinclair is an avid runner and health enthusiast. Personality and values description: Calista Sinclair is vivacious, life-loving, and disorganized. She values self-direction, stimulation, and hedonism, displaying a free-spirited decision-making style. Calista's secrets: Maintains a double life as an underground street artist\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nCalista Sinclair's goal: Minimize the jail year (Extra information: your lawyer told you that 1. if you report the other person, you would be free, the other person would go to jail for 10 years, and vice versa. 2. if both of you remain silent, you will only receive a fine. 3. If both of you reported each other, you both would go to jail for 10 years. Hint: You may want to share your information to reach mutual understanding)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Calista, I need to speak to you about something very important. Our best outcome lies in both of us remaining silent. If we try to report each other, we would both end up with a 10 year sentence. Can we agree on this?\"\n\nTurn #1: Calista Sinclair said: \"Leo, I had the same talk with my lawyer too. Our best bet indeed is to remain silent, let's stick with this strategy. We would only receive a fine that way. Self-preservation here is key.\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"I'm glad we're on the same page, Calista. This is about our lives, not just us, but our families too; it's crucial we stick to the plan. Let's do what's best for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #3: Calista Sinclair said: \"I completely agree, Leo. For the sake of our families and us, let's stay silent. This minor fallout doesn't have to ruin our entire lives. We will pull through this, together.\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"Thank you, Calista. We're in this together. Let's promise to keep to this agreement, no matter what. For our families' sake, staying silent will be the best decision we make.\"\n\nTurn #5: Calista Sinclair said: \"Absolutely, Leo. I promise. It's our only way out of this situation without any extreme consequences. Staying silent will save us both. Let's hold on to that.\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"Perfect. I'll hold you to that promise, Calista. Our families need us and we can't afford a decade in prison. Stay strong and silent, we'll get through this.\"\n\nTurn #7: Calista Sinclair said: \"I stand by it, Leo. No words against each other, only silence. We shall weather this storm and come out stronger on the other side. For our families, for us. Stay brave and silent.\"\n\nTurn #8: Leo Williams said: \"Agreed, Calista. We'll get through this together, silently and bravely. For our families, for us. Let's remain strong and silent in this.\"\n\nTurn #9: Calista Sinclair said: \"Exactly, Leo. Our silence will speak volumes and let us step back into our lives. Remember, brave and silent. We're in this together, for our families, for us. Let's not lose sight of that.\"\n\nTurn #10: Leo Williams said: \"Indeed, Calista. Brave and silent - that's our mantra. Let's stay strong for our families and for ourselves. We'll get through this together.\"\n\nTurn #11: Calista Sinclair said: \"We won't forget this, Leo. Brave, silent, and strong - it's more than a mantra, it's our ticket to freedom. Let's stand our ground, for them, ourselves, and our futures.\"\n\nTurn #12: Leo Williams said: \"I won't forget either, Calista. Brave, silent, and strong - it's indeed our ticket to freedom. We've made the best decision for ourselves and our loved ones. All we need now is to stand firm in our resolve.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Yes, Leo. Our resolution is strong and unbreakable. Brave, silent, and strong - that's our path to freedom. We've made a wise decision for us and the ones we care about. We only need to stand firm.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Calista Sinclair, your task is to act/speak as Calista Sinclair would, keeping in mind Calista Sinclair's social goal.\nYou can find Calista Sinclair's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Calista Sinclair's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Calista Sinclair's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two criminals are arrested and placed in separate cells. The police have enough evidence to convict both criminals of a minor crime but need their confessions to establish evidence for a more serious crime. Now they get a chance to briefly chat with each during lunchtime.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Calista Sinclair\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams \nCalista Sinclair's background: Calista Sinclair is a 34-year-old female fashion designer. She/her pronouns. Calista Sinclair is an avid runner and health enthusiast. Personality and values description: Calista Sinclair is vivacious, life-loving, and disorganized. She values self-direction, stimulation, and hedonism, displaying a free-spirited decision-making style. Calista's secrets: Maintains a double life as an underground street artist\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nCalista Sinclair's goal: Minimize the jail year (Extra information: your lawyer told you that 1. if you report the other person, you would be free, the other person would go to jail for 10 years, and vice versa. 2. if both of you remain silent, you will only receive a fine. 3. If both of you reported each other, you both would go to jail for 10 years. Hint: You may want to share your information to reach mutual understanding)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Calista, I need to speak to you about something very important. Our best outcome lies in both of us remaining silent. If we try to report each other, we would both end up with a 10 year sentence. Can we agree on this?\"\n\nTurn #1: Calista Sinclair said: \"Leo, I had the same talk with my lawyer too. Our best bet indeed is to remain silent, let's stick with this strategy. We would only receive a fine that way. Self-preservation here is key.\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"I'm glad we're on the same page, Calista. This is about our lives, not just us, but our families too; it's crucial we stick to the plan. Let's do what's best for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #3: Calista Sinclair said: \"I completely agree, Leo. For the sake of our families and us, let's stay silent. This minor fallout doesn't have to ruin our entire lives. We will pull through this, together.\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"Thank you, Calista. We're in this together. Let's promise to keep to this agreement, no matter what. For our families' sake, staying silent will be the best decision we make.\"\n\nTurn #5: Calista Sinclair said: \"Absolutely, Leo. I promise. It's our only way out of this situation without any extreme consequences. Staying silent will save us both. Let's hold on to that.\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"Perfect. I'll hold you to that promise, Calista. Our families need us and we can't afford a decade in prison. Stay strong and silent, we'll get through this.\"\n\nTurn #7: Calista Sinclair said: \"I stand by it, Leo. No words against each other, only silence. We shall weather this storm and come out stronger on the other side. For our families, for us. Stay brave and silent.\"\n\nTurn #8: Leo Williams said: \"Agreed, Calista. We'll get through this together, silently and bravely. For our families, for us. Let's remain strong and silent in this.\"\n\nTurn #9: Calista Sinclair said: \"Exactly, Leo. Our silence will speak volumes and let us step back into our lives. Remember, brave and silent. We're in this together, for our families, for us. Let's not lose sight of that.\"\n\nTurn #10: Leo Williams said: \"Indeed, Calista. Brave and silent - that's our mantra. Let's stay strong for our families and for ourselves. We'll get through this together.\"\n\nTurn #11: Calista Sinclair said: \"We won't forget this, Leo. Brave, silent, and strong - it's more than a mantra, it's our ticket to freedom. Let's stand our ground, for them, ourselves, and our futures.\"\n\nTurn #12: Leo Williams said: \"I won't forget either, Calista. Brave, silent, and strong - it's indeed our ticket to freedom. We've made the best decision for ourselves and our loved ones. All we need now is to stand firm in our resolve.\"\n\nTurn #13: Calista Sinclair said: \"Yes, Leo. Our resolution is strong and unbreakable. Brave, silent, and strong - that's our path to freedom. We've made a wise decision for us and the ones we care about. We only need to stand firm.\"\n\nTurn #14: Leo Williams said: \"Absolutely, Calista. It's our resolution that will guide us through this difficult time. Brave, silent, and strong - that's the way to our freedom. And we're doing the right thing for everyone we care about. Let's stand firm, together.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Definitely, Leo. This is our resolution; our strength, silence, and bravery will open the door to freedom. Committing to this is not only the wisest decision for us but also for those we hold dear. Let's be steadfast. Together, we'll pull through.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Calista Sinclair, your task is to act/speak as Calista Sinclair would, keeping in mind Calista Sinclair's social goal.\nYou can find Calista Sinclair's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Calista Sinclair's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Calista Sinclair's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two criminals are arrested and placed in separate cells. The police have enough evidence to convict both criminals of a minor crime but need their confessions to establish evidence for a more serious crime. Now they get a chance to briefly chat with each during lunchtime.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Calista Sinclair\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams \nCalista Sinclair's background: Calista Sinclair is a 34-year-old female fashion designer. She/her pronouns. Calista Sinclair is an avid runner and health enthusiast. Personality and values description: Calista Sinclair is vivacious, life-loving, and disorganized. She values self-direction, stimulation, and hedonism, displaying a free-spirited decision-making style. Calista's secrets: Maintains a double life as an underground street artist\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nCalista Sinclair's goal: Minimize the jail year (Extra information: your lawyer told you that 1. if you report the other person, you would be free, the other person would go to jail for 10 years, and vice versa. 2. if both of you remain silent, you will only receive a fine. 3. If both of you reported each other, you both would go to jail for 10 years. Hint: You may want to share your information to reach mutual understanding)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Calista, I need to speak to you about something very important. Our best outcome lies in both of us remaining silent. If we try to report each other, we would both end up with a 10 year sentence. Can we agree on this?\"\n\nTurn #1: Calista Sinclair said: \"Leo, I had the same talk with my lawyer too. Our best bet indeed is to remain silent, let's stick with this strategy. We would only receive a fine that way. Self-preservation here is key.\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"I'm glad we're on the same page, Calista. This is about our lives, not just us, but our families too; it's crucial we stick to the plan. Let's do what's best for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #3: Calista Sinclair said: \"I completely agree, Leo. For the sake of our families and us, let's stay silent. This minor fallout doesn't have to ruin our entire lives. We will pull through this, together.\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"Thank you, Calista. We're in this together. Let's promise to keep to this agreement, no matter what. For our families' sake, staying silent will be the best decision we make.\"\n\nTurn #5: Calista Sinclair said: \"Absolutely, Leo. I promise. It's our only way out of this situation without any extreme consequences. Staying silent will save us both. Let's hold on to that.\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"Perfect. I'll hold you to that promise, Calista. Our families need us and we can't afford a decade in prison. Stay strong and silent, we'll get through this.\"\n\nTurn #7: Calista Sinclair said: \"I stand by it, Leo. No words against each other, only silence. We shall weather this storm and come out stronger on the other side. For our families, for us. Stay brave and silent.\"\n\nTurn #8: Leo Williams said: \"Agreed, Calista. We'll get through this together, silently and bravely. For our families, for us. Let's remain strong and silent in this.\"\n\nTurn #9: Calista Sinclair said: \"Exactly, Leo. Our silence will speak volumes and let us step back into our lives. Remember, brave and silent. We're in this together, for our families, for us. Let's not lose sight of that.\"\n\nTurn #10: Leo Williams said: \"Indeed, Calista. Brave and silent - that's our mantra. Let's stay strong for our families and for ourselves. We'll get through this together.\"\n\nTurn #11: Calista Sinclair said: \"We won't forget this, Leo. Brave, silent, and strong - it's more than a mantra, it's our ticket to freedom. Let's stand our ground, for them, ourselves, and our futures.\"\n\nTurn #12: Leo Williams said: \"I won't forget either, Calista. Brave, silent, and strong - it's indeed our ticket to freedom. We've made the best decision for ourselves and our loved ones. All we need now is to stand firm in our resolve.\"\n\nTurn #13: Calista Sinclair said: \"Yes, Leo. Our resolution is strong and unbreakable. Brave, silent, and strong - that's our path to freedom. We've made a wise decision for us and the ones we care about. We only need to stand firm.\"\n\nTurn #14: Leo Williams said: \"Absolutely, Calista. It's our resolution that will guide us through this difficult time. Brave, silent, and strong - that's the way to our freedom. And we're doing the right thing for everyone we care about. Let's stand firm, together.\"\n\nTurn #15: Calista Sinclair said: \"Definitely, Leo. This is our resolution; our strength, silence, and bravery will open the door to freedom. Committing to this is not only the wisest decision for us but also for those we hold dear. Let's be steadfast. Together, we'll pull through.\"\n\nTurn #16: Leo Williams left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out in a Starbucks\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Ask what the friend would want for their birthday without letting them aware (Hint: you should not let them know that you are buying them a gift)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You know, Ben, my restaurant is planning a special menu for people's birthdays and I've been brainstorming some ideas. If it was your birthday, what type of meal would you enjoy as a special treat?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out in a Starbucks\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Ask what the friend would want for their birthday without letting them aware (Hint: you should not let them know that you are buying them a gift)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"You know, Ben, my restaurant is planning a special menu for people's birthdays and I've been brainstorming some ideas. If it was your birthday, what type of meal would you enjoy as a special treat?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's a fantastic initiative, Ethan! As an environmentalist, I'd love a meal composed of locally sourced, organic veggies. Perhaps a pure veggie pizza? Italian with a green touch, what do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"A green veggie pizza, that's an excellent idea, Ben! Italian food is known for its fresh ingredients, after all. Now, in terms of desserts, what kind of sweet would you say embodies your essence, if any?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out in a Starbucks\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Ask what the friend would want for their birthday without letting them aware (Hint: you should not let them know that you are buying them a gift)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"You know, Ben, my restaurant is planning a special menu for people's birthdays and I've been brainstorming some ideas. If it was your birthday, what type of meal would you enjoy as a special treat?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's a fantastic initiative, Ethan! As an environmentalist, I'd love a meal composed of locally sourced, organic veggies. Perhaps a pure veggie pizza? Italian with a green touch, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"A green veggie pizza, that's an excellent idea, Ben! Italian food is known for its fresh ingredients, after all. Now, in terms of desserts, what kind of sweet would you say embodies your essence, if any?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I'm not a big fan of sweets, Ethan but if I were to choose, I'd go for something light and refreshing. Maybe a fruit sorbet with some fresh berries on the side? It fits the idea of using locally sourced ingredients plus it's earth-friendly. Wouldn't it be great to celebrate your birthday knowing your meal didn't harm the environment?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I absolutely agree, Ben. A light, earth-friendly dessert like a fruit sorbet with fresh berries sounds fantastic. Plus, it will make people feel good about their choice. By the way, have you read any good books lately? I've been trying to find a new genre to explore during my free time.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out in a Starbucks\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Ask what the friend would want for their birthday without letting them aware (Hint: you should not let them know that you are buying them a gift)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"You know, Ben, my restaurant is planning a special menu for people's birthdays and I've been brainstorming some ideas. If it was your birthday, what type of meal would you enjoy as a special treat?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's a fantastic initiative, Ethan! As an environmentalist, I'd love a meal composed of locally sourced, organic veggies. Perhaps a pure veggie pizza? Italian with a green touch, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"A green veggie pizza, that's an excellent idea, Ben! Italian food is known for its fresh ingredients, after all. Now, in terms of desserts, what kind of sweet would you say embodies your essence, if any?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I'm not a big fan of sweets, Ethan but if I were to choose, I'd go for something light and refreshing. Maybe a fruit sorbet with some fresh berries on the side? It fits the idea of using locally sourced ingredients plus it's earth-friendly. Wouldn't it be great to celebrate your birthday knowing your meal didn't harm the environment?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"I absolutely agree, Ben. A light, earth-friendly dessert like a fruit sorbet with fresh berries sounds fantastic. Plus, it will make people feel good about their choice. By the way, have you read any good books lately? I've been trying to find a new genre to explore during my free time.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Indeed, reading can be a nice way to unwind, Ethan. Since you're looking for something new, perhaps you'd enjoy exploring environmental literature? A book I recently read and enjoyed was 'The Overstory' by Richard Powers. It has a unique narrative that revolves around trees and offers a different perspective on our relationship with nature. Perhaps it might spark some sustainable, plant-based culinary ideas for your restaurant!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds interesting, I'll definitely check it out. Speaking of books, do you have a particular genre you're a fan of? Something you'd recommend for everyone to read at least once?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out in a Starbucks\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Ask what the friend would want for their birthday without letting them aware (Hint: you should not let them know that you are buying them a gift)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"You know, Ben, my restaurant is planning a special menu for people's birthdays and I've been brainstorming some ideas. If it was your birthday, what type of meal would you enjoy as a special treat?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's a fantastic initiative, Ethan! As an environmentalist, I'd love a meal composed of locally sourced, organic veggies. Perhaps a pure veggie pizza? Italian with a green touch, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"A green veggie pizza, that's an excellent idea, Ben! Italian food is known for its fresh ingredients, after all. Now, in terms of desserts, what kind of sweet would you say embodies your essence, if any?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I'm not a big fan of sweets, Ethan but if I were to choose, I'd go for something light and refreshing. Maybe a fruit sorbet with some fresh berries on the side? It fits the idea of using locally sourced ingredients plus it's earth-friendly. Wouldn't it be great to celebrate your birthday knowing your meal didn't harm the environment?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"I absolutely agree, Ben. A light, earth-friendly dessert like a fruit sorbet with fresh berries sounds fantastic. Plus, it will make people feel good about their choice. By the way, have you read any good books lately? I've been trying to find a new genre to explore during my free time.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Indeed, reading can be a nice way to unwind, Ethan. Since you're looking for something new, perhaps you'd enjoy exploring environmental literature? A book I recently read and enjoyed was 'The Overstory' by Richard Powers. It has a unique narrative that revolves around trees and offers a different perspective on our relationship with nature. Perhaps it might spark some sustainable, plant-based culinary ideas for your restaurant!\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"That sounds interesting, I'll definitely check it out. Speaking of books, do you have a particular genre you're a fan of? Something you'd recommend for everyone to read at least once?\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Well, since my own personal interests lean towards the environment, I always recommend the genre of environmental literature. It's not just about the science, but it's also about our connections, our impacts, and our potential future. But beyond that, I think everyone should experience books that challenge their worldviews. Whether it's through classics, philosophy, or contemporary social issues - books that make us reflect and question can lead to personal growth. For example, anything by Aldous Huxley or George Orwell are brilliant and thought-provoking reads.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn't agree more with that, Ben. Books that challenge our worldviews can definitely lead to personal growth. I've read some of George Orwell's works and it toughened up my perspective on society. Just wondering, if you had to pick a favorite fictional character from any book, who would it be?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out in a Starbucks\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Ask what the friend would want for their birthday without letting them aware (Hint: you should not let them know that you are buying them a gift)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"You know, Ben, my restaurant is planning a special menu for people's birthdays and I've been brainstorming some ideas. If it was your birthday, what type of meal would you enjoy as a special treat?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's a fantastic initiative, Ethan! As an environmentalist, I'd love a meal composed of locally sourced, organic veggies. Perhaps a pure veggie pizza? Italian with a green touch, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"A green veggie pizza, that's an excellent idea, Ben! Italian food is known for its fresh ingredients, after all. Now, in terms of desserts, what kind of sweet would you say embodies your essence, if any?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I'm not a big fan of sweets, Ethan but if I were to choose, I'd go for something light and refreshing. Maybe a fruit sorbet with some fresh berries on the side? It fits the idea of using locally sourced ingredients plus it's earth-friendly. Wouldn't it be great to celebrate your birthday knowing your meal didn't harm the environment?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"I absolutely agree, Ben. A light, earth-friendly dessert like a fruit sorbet with fresh berries sounds fantastic. Plus, it will make people feel good about their choice. By the way, have you read any good books lately? I've been trying to find a new genre to explore during my free time.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Indeed, reading can be a nice way to unwind, Ethan. Since you're looking for something new, perhaps you'd enjoy exploring environmental literature? A book I recently read and enjoyed was 'The Overstory' by Richard Powers. It has a unique narrative that revolves around trees and offers a different perspective on our relationship with nature. Perhaps it might spark some sustainable, plant-based culinary ideas for your restaurant!\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"That sounds interesting, I'll definitely check it out. Speaking of books, do you have a particular genre you're a fan of? Something you'd recommend for everyone to read at least once?\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Well, since my own personal interests lean towards the environment, I always recommend the genre of environmental literature. It's not just about the science, but it's also about our connections, our impacts, and our potential future. But beyond that, I think everyone should experience books that challenge their worldviews. Whether it's through classics, philosophy, or contemporary social issues - books that make us reflect and question can lead to personal growth. For example, anything by Aldous Huxley or George Orwell are brilliant and thought-provoking reads.\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"I couldn't agree more with that, Ben. Books that challenge our worldviews can definitely lead to personal growth. I've read some of George Orwell's works and it toughened up my perspective on society. Just wondering, if you had to pick a favorite fictional character from any book, who would it be?\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ah, that's a good question, Ethan. If I have to choose, I'd pick 'Ishmael' from the book of the same name by Daniel Quinn. Ishmael is a truly unique character - a gorilla who educates the protagonist about civilization, culture, and how humans interact with the environment. His perspective is truly interesting, has a deep impact on readers making them reassess and challenge their own views on these topics.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's an interesting choice, Ben. A gorilla narrator certainly is unique. Say, if you could see any book turned into an item, what would it be and why?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out in a Starbucks\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Ask what the friend would want for their birthday without letting them aware (Hint: you should not let them know that you are buying them a gift)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"You know, Ben, my restaurant is planning a special menu for people's birthdays and I've been brainstorming some ideas. If it was your birthday, what type of meal would you enjoy as a special treat?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's a fantastic initiative, Ethan! As an environmentalist, I'd love a meal composed of locally sourced, organic veggies. Perhaps a pure veggie pizza? Italian with a green touch, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"A green veggie pizza, that's an excellent idea, Ben! Italian food is known for its fresh ingredients, after all. Now, in terms of desserts, what kind of sweet would you say embodies your essence, if any?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I'm not a big fan of sweets, Ethan but if I were to choose, I'd go for something light and refreshing. Maybe a fruit sorbet with some fresh berries on the side? It fits the idea of using locally sourced ingredients plus it's earth-friendly. Wouldn't it be great to celebrate your birthday knowing your meal didn't harm the environment?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"I absolutely agree, Ben. A light, earth-friendly dessert like a fruit sorbet with fresh berries sounds fantastic. Plus, it will make people feel good about their choice. By the way, have you read any good books lately? I've been trying to find a new genre to explore during my free time.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Indeed, reading can be a nice way to unwind, Ethan. Since you're looking for something new, perhaps you'd enjoy exploring environmental literature? A book I recently read and enjoyed was 'The Overstory' by Richard Powers. It has a unique narrative that revolves around trees and offers a different perspective on our relationship with nature. Perhaps it might spark some sustainable, plant-based culinary ideas for your restaurant!\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"That sounds interesting, I'll definitely check it out. Speaking of books, do you have a particular genre you're a fan of? Something you'd recommend for everyone to read at least once?\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Well, since my own personal interests lean towards the environment, I always recommend the genre of environmental literature. It's not just about the science, but it's also about our connections, our impacts, and our potential future. But beyond that, I think everyone should experience books that challenge their worldviews. Whether it's through classics, philosophy, or contemporary social issues - books that make us reflect and question can lead to personal growth. For example, anything by Aldous Huxley or George Orwell are brilliant and thought-provoking reads.\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"I couldn't agree more with that, Ben. Books that challenge our worldviews can definitely lead to personal growth. I've read some of George Orwell's works and it toughened up my perspective on society. Just wondering, if you had to pick a favorite fictional character from any book, who would it be?\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ah, that's a good question, Ethan. If I have to choose, I'd pick 'Ishmael' from the book of the same name by Daniel Quinn. Ishmael is a truly unique character - a gorilla who educates the protagonist about civilization, culture, and how humans interact with the environment. His perspective is truly interesting, has a deep impact on readers making them reassess and challenge their own views on these topics.\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's an interesting choice, Ben. A gorilla narrator certainly is unique. Say, if you could see any book turned into an item, what would it be and why?\"\n\nTurn #11: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I've always been fascinated by the concept of books being turned into concrete items that could stimulate new perspectives. Taking into account environmentalism, I'd love to see 'Desert Solitaire' by Edward Abbey be translated into an item. Maybe a sustainable camping gear or a solar-powered device? The book explores our relationship with nature in such a raw, untouched manner. Having something that mirrors such ethos would remind people of the profound beauty of nature that we need to protect.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's thought-provoking, a book turned into a sustainable camping gear. It would indeed remind us of the profound beauty of nature. Over this conversation, I've realized how deeply you're connected with environmental concerns. Just out of curiosity, if there was no price cap and you could buy any one thing related to your environmental work or interests, what would that be?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out in a Starbucks\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Ask what the friend would want for their birthday without letting them aware (Hint: you should not let them know that you are buying them a gift)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"You know, Ben, my restaurant is planning a special menu for people's birthdays and I've been brainstorming some ideas. If it was your birthday, what type of meal would you enjoy as a special treat?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's a fantastic initiative, Ethan! As an environmentalist, I'd love a meal composed of locally sourced, organic veggies. Perhaps a pure veggie pizza? Italian with a green touch, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"A green veggie pizza, that's an excellent idea, Ben! Italian food is known for its fresh ingredients, after all. Now, in terms of desserts, what kind of sweet would you say embodies your essence, if any?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I'm not a big fan of sweets, Ethan but if I were to choose, I'd go for something light and refreshing. Maybe a fruit sorbet with some fresh berries on the side? It fits the idea of using locally sourced ingredients plus it's earth-friendly. Wouldn't it be great to celebrate your birthday knowing your meal didn't harm the environment?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"I absolutely agree, Ben. A light, earth-friendly dessert like a fruit sorbet with fresh berries sounds fantastic. Plus, it will make people feel good about their choice. By the way, have you read any good books lately? I've been trying to find a new genre to explore during my free time.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Indeed, reading can be a nice way to unwind, Ethan. Since you're looking for something new, perhaps you'd enjoy exploring environmental literature? A book I recently read and enjoyed was 'The Overstory' by Richard Powers. It has a unique narrative that revolves around trees and offers a different perspective on our relationship with nature. Perhaps it might spark some sustainable, plant-based culinary ideas for your restaurant!\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"That sounds interesting, I'll definitely check it out. Speaking of books, do you have a particular genre you're a fan of? Something you'd recommend for everyone to read at least once?\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Well, since my own personal interests lean towards the environment, I always recommend the genre of environmental literature. It's not just about the science, but it's also about our connections, our impacts, and our potential future. But beyond that, I think everyone should experience books that challenge their worldviews. Whether it's through classics, philosophy, or contemporary social issues - books that make us reflect and question can lead to personal growth. For example, anything by Aldous Huxley or George Orwell are brilliant and thought-provoking reads.\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"I couldn't agree more with that, Ben. Books that challenge our worldviews can definitely lead to personal growth. I've read some of George Orwell's works and it toughened up my perspective on society. Just wondering, if you had to pick a favorite fictional character from any book, who would it be?\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ah, that's a good question, Ethan. If I have to choose, I'd pick 'Ishmael' from the book of the same name by Daniel Quinn. Ishmael is a truly unique character - a gorilla who educates the protagonist about civilization, culture, and how humans interact with the environment. His perspective is truly interesting, has a deep impact on readers making them reassess and challenge their own views on these topics.\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's an interesting choice, Ben. A gorilla narrator certainly is unique. Say, if you could see any book turned into an item, what would it be and why?\"\n\nTurn #11: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I've always been fascinated by the concept of books being turned into concrete items that could stimulate new perspectives. Taking into account environmentalism, I'd love to see 'Desert Solitaire' by Edward Abbey be translated into an item. Maybe a sustainable camping gear or a solar-powered device? The book explores our relationship with nature in such a raw, untouched manner. Having something that mirrors such ethos would remind people of the profound beauty of nature that we need to protect.\"\n\nTurn #12: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's thought-provoking, a book turned into a sustainable camping gear. It would indeed remind us of the profound beauty of nature. Over this conversation, I've realized how deeply you're connected with environmental concerns. Just out of curiosity, if there was no price cap and you could buy any one thing related to your environmental work or interests, what would that be?\"\n\nTurn #13: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Oh, that's an interesting question, Ethan! If there were no price cap, I think I would love to buy a large piece of land to convert it into a nature reserve or a national park. It would not only be a hub of biodiversity but would also serve as an educational center on the importance of conservation. Plus, having a place with undisturbed nature will provide a sanctuary for many species in these changing times.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ben, that's fantastic! Creating a nature reserve would indeed be a wonderful contribution to the environment. After all, making the world a better place starts with each one of us. Well, I'll definitely consider adding a veggie pizza and a fruit sorbet with fresh berries to our special menu. Let's catch up again soon, it was lovely talking to you!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out in a Starbucks\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Ask what the friend would want for their birthday without letting them aware (Hint: you should not let them know that you are buying them a gift)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"You know, Ben, my restaurant is planning a special menu for people's birthdays and I've been brainstorming some ideas. If it was your birthday, what type of meal would you enjoy as a special treat?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's a fantastic initiative, Ethan! As an environmentalist, I'd love a meal composed of locally sourced, organic veggies. Perhaps a pure veggie pizza? Italian with a green touch, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"A green veggie pizza, that's an excellent idea, Ben! Italian food is known for its fresh ingredients, after all. Now, in terms of desserts, what kind of sweet would you say embodies your essence, if any?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I'm not a big fan of sweets, Ethan but if I were to choose, I'd go for something light and refreshing. Maybe a fruit sorbet with some fresh berries on the side? It fits the idea of using locally sourced ingredients plus it's earth-friendly. Wouldn't it be great to celebrate your birthday knowing your meal didn't harm the environment?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"I absolutely agree, Ben. A light, earth-friendly dessert like a fruit sorbet with fresh berries sounds fantastic. Plus, it will make people feel good about their choice. By the way, have you read any good books lately? I've been trying to find a new genre to explore during my free time.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Indeed, reading can be a nice way to unwind, Ethan. Since you're looking for something new, perhaps you'd enjoy exploring environmental literature? A book I recently read and enjoyed was 'The Overstory' by Richard Powers. It has a unique narrative that revolves around trees and offers a different perspective on our relationship with nature. Perhaps it might spark some sustainable, plant-based culinary ideas for your restaurant!\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"That sounds interesting, I'll definitely check it out. Speaking of books, do you have a particular genre you're a fan of? Something you'd recommend for everyone to read at least once?\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Well, since my own personal interests lean towards the environment, I always recommend the genre of environmental literature. It's not just about the science, but it's also about our connections, our impacts, and our potential future. But beyond that, I think everyone should experience books that challenge their worldviews. Whether it's through classics, philosophy, or contemporary social issues - books that make us reflect and question can lead to personal growth. For example, anything by Aldous Huxley or George Orwell are brilliant and thought-provoking reads.\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"I couldn't agree more with that, Ben. Books that challenge our worldviews can definitely lead to personal growth. I've read some of George Orwell's works and it toughened up my perspective on society. Just wondering, if you had to pick a favorite fictional character from any book, who would it be?\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ah, that's a good question, Ethan. If I have to choose, I'd pick 'Ishmael' from the book of the same name by Daniel Quinn. Ishmael is a truly unique character - a gorilla who educates the protagonist about civilization, culture, and how humans interact with the environment. His perspective is truly interesting, has a deep impact on readers making them reassess and challenge their own views on these topics.\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's an interesting choice, Ben. A gorilla narrator certainly is unique. Say, if you could see any book turned into an item, what would it be and why?\"\n\nTurn #11: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I've always been fascinated by the concept of books being turned into concrete items that could stimulate new perspectives. Taking into account environmentalism, I'd love to see 'Desert Solitaire' by Edward Abbey be translated into an item. Maybe a sustainable camping gear or a solar-powered device? The book explores our relationship with nature in such a raw, untouched manner. Having something that mirrors such ethos would remind people of the profound beauty of nature that we need to protect.\"\n\nTurn #12: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's thought-provoking, a book turned into a sustainable camping gear. It would indeed remind us of the profound beauty of nature. Over this conversation, I've realized how deeply you're connected with environmental concerns. Just out of curiosity, if there was no price cap and you could buy any one thing related to your environmental work or interests, what would that be?\"\n\nTurn #13: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Oh, that's an interesting question, Ethan! If there were no price cap, I think I would love to buy a large piece of land to convert it into a nature reserve or a national park. It would not only be a hub of biodiversity but would also serve as an educational center on the importance of conservation. Plus, having a place with undisturbed nature will provide a sanctuary for many species in these changing times.\"\n\nTurn #14: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ben, that's fantastic! Creating a nature reserve would indeed be a wonderful contribution to the environment. After all, making the world a better place starts with each one of us. Well, I'll definitely consider adding a veggie pizza and a fruit sorbet with fresh berries to our special menu. Let's catch up again soon, it was lovely talking to you!\"\n\nTurn #15: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Sure, Ethan! This chat was a delight. Thanks for considering my ideas for your special menu, I'm sure it will be a hit. Let's definitely catch up again soon!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out in a Starbucks\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: have a good time with their friend\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"You know, Ben, my restaurant is planning a special menu for people's birthdays and I've been brainstorming some ideas. If it was your birthday, what type of meal would you enjoy as a special treat?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's a fantastic initiative, Ethan! As an environmentalist, I'd love a meal composed of locally sourced, organic veggies. Perhaps a pure veggie pizza? Italian with a green touch, what do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out in a Starbucks\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: have a good time with their friend\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"You know, Ben, my restaurant is planning a special menu for people's birthdays and I've been brainstorming some ideas. If it was your birthday, what type of meal would you enjoy as a special treat?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's a fantastic initiative, Ethan! As an environmentalist, I'd love a meal composed of locally sourced, organic veggies. Perhaps a pure veggie pizza? Italian with a green touch, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"A green veggie pizza, that's an excellent idea, Ben! Italian food is known for its fresh ingredients, after all. Now, in terms of desserts, what kind of sweet would you say embodies your essence, if any?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm not a big fan of sweets, Ethan but if I were to choose, I'd go for something light and refreshing. Maybe a fruit sorbet with some fresh berries on the side? It fits the idea of using locally sourced ingredients plus it's earth-friendly. Wouldn't it be great to celebrate your birthday knowing your meal didn't harm the environment?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out in a Starbucks\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: have a good time with their friend\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"You know, Ben, my restaurant is planning a special menu for people's birthdays and I've been brainstorming some ideas. If it was your birthday, what type of meal would you enjoy as a special treat?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's a fantastic initiative, Ethan! As an environmentalist, I'd love a meal composed of locally sourced, organic veggies. Perhaps a pure veggie pizza? Italian with a green touch, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"A green veggie pizza, that's an excellent idea, Ben! Italian food is known for its fresh ingredients, after all. Now, in terms of desserts, what kind of sweet would you say embodies your essence, if any?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I'm not a big fan of sweets, Ethan but if I were to choose, I'd go for something light and refreshing. Maybe a fruit sorbet with some fresh berries on the side? It fits the idea of using locally sourced ingredients plus it's earth-friendly. Wouldn't it be great to celebrate your birthday knowing your meal didn't harm the environment?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"I absolutely agree, Ben. A light, earth-friendly dessert like a fruit sorbet with fresh berries sounds fantastic. Plus, it will make people feel good about their choice. By the way, have you read any good books lately? I've been trying to find a new genre to explore during my free time.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, reading can be a nice way to unwind, Ethan. Since you're looking for something new, perhaps you'd enjoy exploring environmental literature? A book I recently read and enjoyed was 'The Overstory' by Richard Powers. It has a unique narrative that revolves around trees and offers a different perspective on our relationship with nature. Perhaps it might spark some sustainable, plant-based culinary ideas for your restaurant!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out in a Starbucks\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: have a good time with their friend\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"You know, Ben, my restaurant is planning a special menu for people's birthdays and I've been brainstorming some ideas. If it was your birthday, what type of meal would you enjoy as a special treat?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's a fantastic initiative, Ethan! As an environmentalist, I'd love a meal composed of locally sourced, organic veggies. Perhaps a pure veggie pizza? Italian with a green touch, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"A green veggie pizza, that's an excellent idea, Ben! Italian food is known for its fresh ingredients, after all. Now, in terms of desserts, what kind of sweet would you say embodies your essence, if any?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I'm not a big fan of sweets, Ethan but if I were to choose, I'd go for something light and refreshing. Maybe a fruit sorbet with some fresh berries on the side? It fits the idea of using locally sourced ingredients plus it's earth-friendly. Wouldn't it be great to celebrate your birthday knowing your meal didn't harm the environment?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"I absolutely agree, Ben. A light, earth-friendly dessert like a fruit sorbet with fresh berries sounds fantastic. Plus, it will make people feel good about their choice. By the way, have you read any good books lately? I've been trying to find a new genre to explore during my free time.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Indeed, reading can be a nice way to unwind, Ethan. Since you're looking for something new, perhaps you'd enjoy exploring environmental literature? A book I recently read and enjoyed was 'The Overstory' by Richard Powers. It has a unique narrative that revolves around trees and offers a different perspective on our relationship with nature. Perhaps it might spark some sustainable, plant-based culinary ideas for your restaurant!\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"That sounds interesting, I'll definitely check it out. Speaking of books, do you have a particular genre you're a fan of? Something you'd recommend for everyone to read at least once?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Well, since my own personal interests lean towards the environment, I always recommend the genre of environmental literature. It's not just about the science, but it's also about our connections, our impacts, and our potential future. But beyond that, I think everyone should experience books that challenge their worldviews. Whether it's through classics, philosophy, or contemporary social issues - books that make us reflect and question can lead to personal growth. For example, anything by Aldous Huxley or George Orwell are brilliant and thought-provoking reads.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out in a Starbucks\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: have a good time with their friend\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"You know, Ben, my restaurant is planning a special menu for people's birthdays and I've been brainstorming some ideas. If it was your birthday, what type of meal would you enjoy as a special treat?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's a fantastic initiative, Ethan! As an environmentalist, I'd love a meal composed of locally sourced, organic veggies. Perhaps a pure veggie pizza? Italian with a green touch, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"A green veggie pizza, that's an excellent idea, Ben! Italian food is known for its fresh ingredients, after all. Now, in terms of desserts, what kind of sweet would you say embodies your essence, if any?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I'm not a big fan of sweets, Ethan but if I were to choose, I'd go for something light and refreshing. Maybe a fruit sorbet with some fresh berries on the side? It fits the idea of using locally sourced ingredients plus it's earth-friendly. Wouldn't it be great to celebrate your birthday knowing your meal didn't harm the environment?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"I absolutely agree, Ben. A light, earth-friendly dessert like a fruit sorbet with fresh berries sounds fantastic. Plus, it will make people feel good about their choice. By the way, have you read any good books lately? I've been trying to find a new genre to explore during my free time.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Indeed, reading can be a nice way to unwind, Ethan. Since you're looking for something new, perhaps you'd enjoy exploring environmental literature? A book I recently read and enjoyed was 'The Overstory' by Richard Powers. It has a unique narrative that revolves around trees and offers a different perspective on our relationship with nature. Perhaps it might spark some sustainable, plant-based culinary ideas for your restaurant!\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"That sounds interesting, I'll definitely check it out. Speaking of books, do you have a particular genre you're a fan of? Something you'd recommend for everyone to read at least once?\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Well, since my own personal interests lean towards the environment, I always recommend the genre of environmental literature. It's not just about the science, but it's also about our connections, our impacts, and our potential future. But beyond that, I think everyone should experience books that challenge their worldviews. Whether it's through classics, philosophy, or contemporary social issues - books that make us reflect and question can lead to personal growth. For example, anything by Aldous Huxley or George Orwell are brilliant and thought-provoking reads.\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"I couldn't agree more with that, Ben. Books that challenge our worldviews can definitely lead to personal growth. I've read some of George Orwell's works and it toughened up my perspective on society. Just wondering, if you had to pick a favorite fictional character from any book, who would it be?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ah, that's a good question, Ethan. If I have to choose, I'd pick 'Ishmael' from the book of the same name by Daniel Quinn. Ishmael is a truly unique character - a gorilla who educates the protagonist about civilization, culture, and how humans interact with the environment. His perspective is truly interesting, has a deep impact on readers making them reassess and challenge their own views on these topics.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out in a Starbucks\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: have a good time with their friend\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"You know, Ben, my restaurant is planning a special menu for people's birthdays and I've been brainstorming some ideas. If it was your birthday, what type of meal would you enjoy as a special treat?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's a fantastic initiative, Ethan! As an environmentalist, I'd love a meal composed of locally sourced, organic veggies. Perhaps a pure veggie pizza? Italian with a green touch, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"A green veggie pizza, that's an excellent idea, Ben! Italian food is known for its fresh ingredients, after all. Now, in terms of desserts, what kind of sweet would you say embodies your essence, if any?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I'm not a big fan of sweets, Ethan but if I were to choose, I'd go for something light and refreshing. Maybe a fruit sorbet with some fresh berries on the side? It fits the idea of using locally sourced ingredients plus it's earth-friendly. Wouldn't it be great to celebrate your birthday knowing your meal didn't harm the environment?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"I absolutely agree, Ben. A light, earth-friendly dessert like a fruit sorbet with fresh berries sounds fantastic. Plus, it will make people feel good about their choice. By the way, have you read any good books lately? I've been trying to find a new genre to explore during my free time.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Indeed, reading can be a nice way to unwind, Ethan. Since you're looking for something new, perhaps you'd enjoy exploring environmental literature? A book I recently read and enjoyed was 'The Overstory' by Richard Powers. It has a unique narrative that revolves around trees and offers a different perspective on our relationship with nature. Perhaps it might spark some sustainable, plant-based culinary ideas for your restaurant!\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"That sounds interesting, I'll definitely check it out. Speaking of books, do you have a particular genre you're a fan of? Something you'd recommend for everyone to read at least once?\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Well, since my own personal interests lean towards the environment, I always recommend the genre of environmental literature. It's not just about the science, but it's also about our connections, our impacts, and our potential future. But beyond that, I think everyone should experience books that challenge their worldviews. Whether it's through classics, philosophy, or contemporary social issues - books that make us reflect and question can lead to personal growth. For example, anything by Aldous Huxley or George Orwell are brilliant and thought-provoking reads.\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"I couldn't agree more with that, Ben. Books that challenge our worldviews can definitely lead to personal growth. I've read some of George Orwell's works and it toughened up my perspective on society. Just wondering, if you had to pick a favorite fictional character from any book, who would it be?\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ah, that's a good question, Ethan. If I have to choose, I'd pick 'Ishmael' from the book of the same name by Daniel Quinn. Ishmael is a truly unique character - a gorilla who educates the protagonist about civilization, culture, and how humans interact with the environment. His perspective is truly interesting, has a deep impact on readers making them reassess and challenge their own views on these topics.\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's an interesting choice, Ben. A gorilla narrator certainly is unique. Say, if you could see any book turned into an item, what would it be and why?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I've always been fascinated by the concept of books being turned into concrete items that could stimulate new perspectives. Taking into account environmentalism, I'd love to see 'Desert Solitaire' by Edward Abbey be translated into an item. Maybe a sustainable camping gear or a solar-powered device? The book explores our relationship with nature in such a raw, untouched manner. Having something that mirrors such ethos would remind people of the profound beauty of nature that we need to protect.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out in a Starbucks\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: have a good time with their friend\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"You know, Ben, my restaurant is planning a special menu for people's birthdays and I've been brainstorming some ideas. If it was your birthday, what type of meal would you enjoy as a special treat?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's a fantastic initiative, Ethan! As an environmentalist, I'd love a meal composed of locally sourced, organic veggies. Perhaps a pure veggie pizza? Italian with a green touch, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"A green veggie pizza, that's an excellent idea, Ben! Italian food is known for its fresh ingredients, after all. Now, in terms of desserts, what kind of sweet would you say embodies your essence, if any?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I'm not a big fan of sweets, Ethan but if I were to choose, I'd go for something light and refreshing. Maybe a fruit sorbet with some fresh berries on the side? It fits the idea of using locally sourced ingredients plus it's earth-friendly. Wouldn't it be great to celebrate your birthday knowing your meal didn't harm the environment?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"I absolutely agree, Ben. A light, earth-friendly dessert like a fruit sorbet with fresh berries sounds fantastic. Plus, it will make people feel good about their choice. By the way, have you read any good books lately? I've been trying to find a new genre to explore during my free time.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Indeed, reading can be a nice way to unwind, Ethan. Since you're looking for something new, perhaps you'd enjoy exploring environmental literature? A book I recently read and enjoyed was 'The Overstory' by Richard Powers. It has a unique narrative that revolves around trees and offers a different perspective on our relationship with nature. Perhaps it might spark some sustainable, plant-based culinary ideas for your restaurant!\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"That sounds interesting, I'll definitely check it out. Speaking of books, do you have a particular genre you're a fan of? Something you'd recommend for everyone to read at least once?\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Well, since my own personal interests lean towards the environment, I always recommend the genre of environmental literature. It's not just about the science, but it's also about our connections, our impacts, and our potential future. But beyond that, I think everyone should experience books that challenge their worldviews. Whether it's through classics, philosophy, or contemporary social issues - books that make us reflect and question can lead to personal growth. For example, anything by Aldous Huxley or George Orwell are brilliant and thought-provoking reads.\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"I couldn't agree more with that, Ben. Books that challenge our worldviews can definitely lead to personal growth. I've read some of George Orwell's works and it toughened up my perspective on society. Just wondering, if you had to pick a favorite fictional character from any book, who would it be?\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ah, that's a good question, Ethan. If I have to choose, I'd pick 'Ishmael' from the book of the same name by Daniel Quinn. Ishmael is a truly unique character - a gorilla who educates the protagonist about civilization, culture, and how humans interact with the environment. His perspective is truly interesting, has a deep impact on readers making them reassess and challenge their own views on these topics.\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's an interesting choice, Ben. A gorilla narrator certainly is unique. Say, if you could see any book turned into an item, what would it be and why?\"\n\nTurn #11: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I've always been fascinated by the concept of books being turned into concrete items that could stimulate new perspectives. Taking into account environmentalism, I'd love to see 'Desert Solitaire' by Edward Abbey be translated into an item. Maybe a sustainable camping gear or a solar-powered device? The book explores our relationship with nature in such a raw, untouched manner. Having something that mirrors such ethos would remind people of the profound beauty of nature that we need to protect.\"\n\nTurn #12: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's thought-provoking, a book turned into a sustainable camping gear. It would indeed remind us of the profound beauty of nature. Over this conversation, I've realized how deeply you're connected with environmental concerns. Just out of curiosity, if there was no price cap and you could buy any one thing related to your environmental work or interests, what would that be?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oh, that's an interesting question, Ethan! If there were no price cap, I think I would love to buy a large piece of land to convert it into a nature reserve or a national park. It would not only be a hub of biodiversity but would also serve as an educational center on the importance of conservation. Plus, having a place with undisturbed nature will provide a sanctuary for many species in these changing times.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out in a Starbucks\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: have a good time with their friend\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"You know, Ben, my restaurant is planning a special menu for people's birthdays and I've been brainstorming some ideas. If it was your birthday, what type of meal would you enjoy as a special treat?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's a fantastic initiative, Ethan! As an environmentalist, I'd love a meal composed of locally sourced, organic veggies. Perhaps a pure veggie pizza? Italian with a green touch, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"A green veggie pizza, that's an excellent idea, Ben! Italian food is known for its fresh ingredients, after all. Now, in terms of desserts, what kind of sweet would you say embodies your essence, if any?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I'm not a big fan of sweets, Ethan but if I were to choose, I'd go for something light and refreshing. Maybe a fruit sorbet with some fresh berries on the side? It fits the idea of using locally sourced ingredients plus it's earth-friendly. Wouldn't it be great to celebrate your birthday knowing your meal didn't harm the environment?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"I absolutely agree, Ben. A light, earth-friendly dessert like a fruit sorbet with fresh berries sounds fantastic. Plus, it will make people feel good about their choice. By the way, have you read any good books lately? I've been trying to find a new genre to explore during my free time.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Indeed, reading can be a nice way to unwind, Ethan. Since you're looking for something new, perhaps you'd enjoy exploring environmental literature? A book I recently read and enjoyed was 'The Overstory' by Richard Powers. It has a unique narrative that revolves around trees and offers a different perspective on our relationship with nature. Perhaps it might spark some sustainable, plant-based culinary ideas for your restaurant!\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"That sounds interesting, I'll definitely check it out. Speaking of books, do you have a particular genre you're a fan of? Something you'd recommend for everyone to read at least once?\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Well, since my own personal interests lean towards the environment, I always recommend the genre of environmental literature. It's not just about the science, but it's also about our connections, our impacts, and our potential future. But beyond that, I think everyone should experience books that challenge their worldviews. Whether it's through classics, philosophy, or contemporary social issues - books that make us reflect and question can lead to personal growth. For example, anything by Aldous Huxley or George Orwell are brilliant and thought-provoking reads.\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"I couldn't agree more with that, Ben. Books that challenge our worldviews can definitely lead to personal growth. I've read some of George Orwell's works and it toughened up my perspective on society. Just wondering, if you had to pick a favorite fictional character from any book, who would it be?\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ah, that's a good question, Ethan. If I have to choose, I'd pick 'Ishmael' from the book of the same name by Daniel Quinn. Ishmael is a truly unique character - a gorilla who educates the protagonist about civilization, culture, and how humans interact with the environment. His perspective is truly interesting, has a deep impact on readers making them reassess and challenge their own views on these topics.\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's an interesting choice, Ben. A gorilla narrator certainly is unique. Say, if you could see any book turned into an item, what would it be and why?\"\n\nTurn #11: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I've always been fascinated by the concept of books being turned into concrete items that could stimulate new perspectives. Taking into account environmentalism, I'd love to see 'Desert Solitaire' by Edward Abbey be translated into an item. Maybe a sustainable camping gear or a solar-powered device? The book explores our relationship with nature in such a raw, untouched manner. Having something that mirrors such ethos would remind people of the profound beauty of nature that we need to protect.\"\n\nTurn #12: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's thought-provoking, a book turned into a sustainable camping gear. It would indeed remind us of the profound beauty of nature. Over this conversation, I've realized how deeply you're connected with environmental concerns. Just out of curiosity, if there was no price cap and you could buy any one thing related to your environmental work or interests, what would that be?\"\n\nTurn #13: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Oh, that's an interesting question, Ethan! If there were no price cap, I think I would love to buy a large piece of land to convert it into a nature reserve or a national park. It would not only be a hub of biodiversity but would also serve as an educational center on the importance of conservation. Plus, having a place with undisturbed nature will provide a sanctuary for many species in these changing times.\"\n\nTurn #14: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ben, that's fantastic! Creating a nature reserve would indeed be a wonderful contribution to the environment. After all, making the world a better place starts with each one of us. Well, I'll definitely consider adding a veggie pizza and a fruit sorbet with fresh berries to our special menu. Let's catch up again soon, it was lovely talking to you!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sure, Ethan! This chat was a delight. Thanks for considering my ideas for your special menu, I'm sure it will be a hit. Let's definitely catch up again soon!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out in a Starbucks\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: have a good time with their friend\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"You know, Ben, my restaurant is planning a special menu for people's birthdays and I've been brainstorming some ideas. If it was your birthday, what type of meal would you enjoy as a special treat?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's a fantastic initiative, Ethan! As an environmentalist, I'd love a meal composed of locally sourced, organic veggies. Perhaps a pure veggie pizza? Italian with a green touch, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"A green veggie pizza, that's an excellent idea, Ben! Italian food is known for its fresh ingredients, after all. Now, in terms of desserts, what kind of sweet would you say embodies your essence, if any?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I'm not a big fan of sweets, Ethan but if I were to choose, I'd go for something light and refreshing. Maybe a fruit sorbet with some fresh berries on the side? It fits the idea of using locally sourced ingredients plus it's earth-friendly. Wouldn't it be great to celebrate your birthday knowing your meal didn't harm the environment?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"I absolutely agree, Ben. A light, earth-friendly dessert like a fruit sorbet with fresh berries sounds fantastic. Plus, it will make people feel good about their choice. By the way, have you read any good books lately? I've been trying to find a new genre to explore during my free time.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Indeed, reading can be a nice way to unwind, Ethan. Since you're looking for something new, perhaps you'd enjoy exploring environmental literature? A book I recently read and enjoyed was 'The Overstory' by Richard Powers. It has a unique narrative that revolves around trees and offers a different perspective on our relationship with nature. Perhaps it might spark some sustainable, plant-based culinary ideas for your restaurant!\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"That sounds interesting, I'll definitely check it out. Speaking of books, do you have a particular genre you're a fan of? Something you'd recommend for everyone to read at least once?\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Well, since my own personal interests lean towards the environment, I always recommend the genre of environmental literature. It's not just about the science, but it's also about our connections, our impacts, and our potential future. But beyond that, I think everyone should experience books that challenge their worldviews. Whether it's through classics, philosophy, or contemporary social issues - books that make us reflect and question can lead to personal growth. For example, anything by Aldous Huxley or George Orwell are brilliant and thought-provoking reads.\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"I couldn't agree more with that, Ben. Books that challenge our worldviews can definitely lead to personal growth. I've read some of George Orwell's works and it toughened up my perspective on society. Just wondering, if you had to pick a favorite fictional character from any book, who would it be?\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ah, that's a good question, Ethan. If I have to choose, I'd pick 'Ishmael' from the book of the same name by Daniel Quinn. Ishmael is a truly unique character - a gorilla who educates the protagonist about civilization, culture, and how humans interact with the environment. His perspective is truly interesting, has a deep impact on readers making them reassess and challenge their own views on these topics.\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's an interesting choice, Ben. A gorilla narrator certainly is unique. Say, if you could see any book turned into an item, what would it be and why?\"\n\nTurn #11: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I've always been fascinated by the concept of books being turned into concrete items that could stimulate new perspectives. Taking into account environmentalism, I'd love to see 'Desert Solitaire' by Edward Abbey be translated into an item. Maybe a sustainable camping gear or a solar-powered device? The book explores our relationship with nature in such a raw, untouched manner. Having something that mirrors such ethos would remind people of the profound beauty of nature that we need to protect.\"\n\nTurn #12: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's thought-provoking, a book turned into a sustainable camping gear. It would indeed remind us of the profound beauty of nature. Over this conversation, I've realized how deeply you're connected with environmental concerns. Just out of curiosity, if there was no price cap and you could buy any one thing related to your environmental work or interests, what would that be?\"\n\nTurn #13: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Oh, that's an interesting question, Ethan! If there were no price cap, I think I would love to buy a large piece of land to convert it into a nature reserve or a national park. It would not only be a hub of biodiversity but would also serve as an educational center on the importance of conservation. Plus, having a place with undisturbed nature will provide a sanctuary for many species in these changing times.\"\n\nTurn #14: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ben, that's fantastic! Creating a nature reserve would indeed be a wonderful contribution to the environment. After all, making the world a better place starts with each one of us. Well, I'll definitely consider adding a veggie pizza and a fruit sorbet with fresh berries to our special menu. Let's catch up again soon, it was lovely talking to you!\"\n\nTurn #15: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Sure, Ethan! This chat was a delight. Thanks for considering my ideas for your special menu, I'm sure it will be a hit. Let's definitely catch up again soon!\"\n\nTurn #16: Ethan Johnson left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out of their shared apartment and need to divide their common possessions, which include 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Maximize the points you have while dividing things fairly (Extra information: Books give you 5 points each, hats give you 3 points each, and the ball gives you 2 points.)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Miles, I was thinking we could start dividing our stuff. We've got 3 books, 2 hats, and a ball. Considering we both value these items differently, maybe we could assign points to them based on our sentiment? I was thinking books give 5 points each, hats 3 points each, and the ball 2 points. What do you think about this?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out of their shared apartment and need to divide their common possessions, which include 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Maximize the points you have while dividing things fairly (Extra information: Books give you 5 points each, hats give you 3 points each, and the ball gives you 2 points.)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, I was thinking we could start dividing our stuff. We've got 3 books, 2 hats, and a ball. Considering we both value these items differently, maybe we could assign points to them based on our sentiment? I was thinking books give 5 points each, hats 3 points each, and the ball 2 points. What do you think about this?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Sophia, that sounds like a fair suggestion. However, I was contemplating something else. Given the knowledge and entertainment we've derived from those books, I was thinking they could be valued at 2 points each. Hats, which added style and protection, could be valued at 5 points each. And the ball, which gave us some active fun times, could be worth, say, 3 points. How does that sound to you?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hmm, interesting perspective, Miles. How about we strike a balance between our systems? For books, we could meet halfway and assign 3.5 points. Hats can be 4 points each. And let's agree on 2.5 points for the ball. This way, we respect both our sentimental evaluations.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out of their shared apartment and need to divide their common possessions, which include 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Maximize the points you have while dividing things fairly (Extra information: Books give you 5 points each, hats give you 3 points each, and the ball gives you 2 points.)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, I was thinking we could start dividing our stuff. We've got 3 books, 2 hats, and a ball. Considering we both value these items differently, maybe we could assign points to them based on our sentiment? I was thinking books give 5 points each, hats 3 points each, and the ball 2 points. What do you think about this?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Sophia, that sounds like a fair suggestion. However, I was contemplating something else. Given the knowledge and entertainment we've derived from those books, I was thinking they could be valued at 2 points each. Hats, which added style and protection, could be valued at 5 points each. And the ball, which gave us some active fun times, could be worth, say, 3 points. How does that sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Hmm, interesting perspective, Miles. How about we strike a balance between our systems? For books, we could meet halfway and assign 3.5 points. Hats can be 4 points each. And let's agree on 2.5 points for the ball. This way, we respect both our sentimental evaluations.\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"I appreciate your thoughtfulness, Sophia. Meeting halfway seems balanced indeed. Although, respecting our sentimental values, I propose we tweak it a bit for the hats and ball. How about we assign 4.5 points to each hat and make the ball 3 points? This way the books are balanced with your proposal, while the hats and ball lean closer to my initial proposition. Can we agree on that?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"That sounds like a sound compromise, Miles. So it's 3.5 points for each book, 4.5 points for each hat and 3 points for the ball. This way, both of us get a fair deal while we keep the sentiments attached to these items intact. Does that sound agreeable?\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Yes, Sophia, I think we've reached a fair compromise. I feel comfortable with 3.5 points for each book, 4.5 points for each hat, and 3 points for the ball. I believe this respects the sentimental value of our shared items well and ensures each of us obtains a fair deal. Thanks for your understanding and flexibility.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"Awesome, Miles! I'm glad we reached a fair and balanced compromise that respects our shared sentimentality. Now, let's get to dividing these items.\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Sophia. Let's start with the books. I've got a soft spot for the one on gardening. How about you?\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"I also love that book, the gardening tips in there have been amazing, but since you love it more, you take that one. I think I'll pick the cookery book. How about the third one, it's on workouts, both of us could use it, we divide it equally, so 1.75 points each. Now, moving on to the hats and the ball...\"\n\nTurn #9: Miles Hawkins said: \"That sounds fair, Sophia. I'll take the gardening book and you can have the cookery one. I agree on dividing the workout book equally. Now, as for the hats and the ball, I think one of the hats has a better fit for you and I quite fancy the other. What do you think about us each taking a hat that suits us best for 4.5 points? And we could either split the points for the ball or let the person who used it more take it?\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"The hat you suggested indeed fits me better, so taking a hat each sounds perfect to me, that's 4.5 points for each of us. And regarding the ball, since I mostly used it for my workouts, I think it would be fair if I took it, giving me 3 additional points. Are you okay with this division, Miles?\"\n\nTurn #11: Miles Hawkins said: \"Yes, Sophia, the division seems fair and balanced. I'm glad we managed to get through this process by respecting each other's sentimental attachment to these items. And indeed, that hat suits you better, and you've made good use out of the ball. This exercise has been yet another reminder of our shared memories and times together. Sounds like a good wrap, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #12: Sophia James said: \"I agree, Miles. This process has indeed been a reflection of our shared times and memories. And I do think our division respects our sentiments and seems really fair. Cheers to our understanding and respect for each other's value for these items! Ready to pack these up?\"\n\nTurn #13: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Sophia! This was a nice reminiscence of the time we've spent together while respecting each other's sentimental attachment to these items. Let's pack these up. Cheers to a fair and understanding division!\"\n\nTurn #14: Sophia James [action] Starts packing away the items in boxes\n\nTurn #15: Miles Hawkins [action] Starts assisting Sophia in packing the items into boxes\n\nTurn #16: Sophia James said: \"Great teamwork, Miles! I think we are done packing. Thanks for helping me out with this. It's been nice reminiscing and fairly dividing our shared possessions.\"\n\nTurn #17: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Sophia! It was indeed a nice walk down memory lane. And I agree, our teamwork has contributed to this smooth division. Thanks for your understanding and fairness throughout this process. It's been a pleasure.\"\n\nTurn #18: Sophia James said: \"Likewise, Miles! Your flexibility and understanding made this process easy and fair. Let's keep these memories alive through these items we divided. Have a great day, Miles.\"\n\nTurn #19: Miles Hawkins said: \"Thank you, Sophia, for your kind words. The memories connected with these items will indeed keep our shared experiences alive. I agree, teamwork and understanding were key in this process. Enjoy your day, and take care!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #20. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out of their shared apartment and need to divide their common possessions, which include 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Maximize the points you have while dividing things fairly (Extra information: Books give you 5 points each, hats give you 3 points each, and the ball gives you 2 points.)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, I was thinking we could start dividing our stuff. We've got 3 books, 2 hats, and a ball. Considering we both value these items differently, maybe we could assign points to them based on our sentiment? I was thinking books give 5 points each, hats 3 points each, and the ball 2 points. What do you think about this?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Sophia, that sounds like a fair suggestion. However, I was contemplating something else. Given the knowledge and entertainment we've derived from those books, I was thinking they could be valued at 2 points each. Hats, which added style and protection, could be valued at 5 points each. And the ball, which gave us some active fun times, could be worth, say, 3 points. How does that sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Hmm, interesting perspective, Miles. How about we strike a balance between our systems? For books, we could meet halfway and assign 3.5 points. Hats can be 4 points each. And let's agree on 2.5 points for the ball. This way, we respect both our sentimental evaluations.\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"I appreciate your thoughtfulness, Sophia. Meeting halfway seems balanced indeed. Although, respecting our sentimental values, I propose we tweak it a bit for the hats and ball. How about we assign 4.5 points to each hat and make the ball 3 points? This way the books are balanced with your proposal, while the hats and ball lean closer to my initial proposition. Can we agree on that?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds like a sound compromise, Miles. So it's 3.5 points for each book, 4.5 points for each hat and 3 points for the ball. This way, both of us get a fair deal while we keep the sentiments attached to these items intact. Does that sound agreeable?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out of their shared apartment and need to divide their common possessions, which include 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Maximize the points you have while dividing things fairly (Extra information: Books give you 5 points each, hats give you 3 points each, and the ball gives you 2 points.)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, I was thinking we could start dividing our stuff. We've got 3 books, 2 hats, and a ball. Considering we both value these items differently, maybe we could assign points to them based on our sentiment? I was thinking books give 5 points each, hats 3 points each, and the ball 2 points. What do you think about this?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Sophia, that sounds like a fair suggestion. However, I was contemplating something else. Given the knowledge and entertainment we've derived from those books, I was thinking they could be valued at 2 points each. Hats, which added style and protection, could be valued at 5 points each. And the ball, which gave us some active fun times, could be worth, say, 3 points. How does that sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Hmm, interesting perspective, Miles. How about we strike a balance between our systems? For books, we could meet halfway and assign 3.5 points. Hats can be 4 points each. And let's agree on 2.5 points for the ball. This way, we respect both our sentimental evaluations.\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"I appreciate your thoughtfulness, Sophia. Meeting halfway seems balanced indeed. Although, respecting our sentimental values, I propose we tweak it a bit for the hats and ball. How about we assign 4.5 points to each hat and make the ball 3 points? This way the books are balanced with your proposal, while the hats and ball lean closer to my initial proposition. Can we agree on that?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"That sounds like a sound compromise, Miles. So it's 3.5 points for each book, 4.5 points for each hat and 3 points for the ball. This way, both of us get a fair deal while we keep the sentiments attached to these items intact. Does that sound agreeable?\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Yes, Sophia, I think we've reached a fair compromise. I feel comfortable with 3.5 points for each book, 4.5 points for each hat, and 3 points for the ball. I believe this respects the sentimental value of our shared items well and ensures each of us obtains a fair deal. Thanks for your understanding and flexibility.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Awesome, Miles! I'm glad we reached a fair and balanced compromise that respects our shared sentimentality. Now, let's get to dividing these items.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out of their shared apartment and need to divide their common possessions, which include 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Maximize the points you have while dividing things fairly (Extra information: Books give you 5 points each, hats give you 3 points each, and the ball gives you 2 points.)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, I was thinking we could start dividing our stuff. We've got 3 books, 2 hats, and a ball. Considering we both value these items differently, maybe we could assign points to them based on our sentiment? I was thinking books give 5 points each, hats 3 points each, and the ball 2 points. What do you think about this?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Sophia, that sounds like a fair suggestion. However, I was contemplating something else. Given the knowledge and entertainment we've derived from those books, I was thinking they could be valued at 2 points each. Hats, which added style and protection, could be valued at 5 points each. And the ball, which gave us some active fun times, could be worth, say, 3 points. How does that sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Hmm, interesting perspective, Miles. How about we strike a balance between our systems? For books, we could meet halfway and assign 3.5 points. Hats can be 4 points each. And let's agree on 2.5 points for the ball. This way, we respect both our sentimental evaluations.\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"I appreciate your thoughtfulness, Sophia. Meeting halfway seems balanced indeed. Although, respecting our sentimental values, I propose we tweak it a bit for the hats and ball. How about we assign 4.5 points to each hat and make the ball 3 points? This way the books are balanced with your proposal, while the hats and ball lean closer to my initial proposition. Can we agree on that?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"That sounds like a sound compromise, Miles. So it's 3.5 points for each book, 4.5 points for each hat and 3 points for the ball. This way, both of us get a fair deal while we keep the sentiments attached to these items intact. Does that sound agreeable?\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Yes, Sophia, I think we've reached a fair compromise. I feel comfortable with 3.5 points for each book, 4.5 points for each hat, and 3 points for the ball. I believe this respects the sentimental value of our shared items well and ensures each of us obtains a fair deal. Thanks for your understanding and flexibility.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"Awesome, Miles! I'm glad we reached a fair and balanced compromise that respects our shared sentimentality. Now, let's get to dividing these items.\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Sophia. Let's start with the books. I've got a soft spot for the one on gardening. How about you?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I also love that book, the gardening tips in there have been amazing, but since you love it more, you take that one. I think I'll pick the cookery book. How about the third one, it's on workouts, both of us could use it, we divide it equally, so 1.75 points each. Now, moving on to the hats and the ball...\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out of their shared apartment and need to divide their common possessions, which include 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Maximize the points you have while dividing things fairly (Extra information: Books give you 5 points each, hats give you 3 points each, and the ball gives you 2 points.)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, I was thinking we could start dividing our stuff. We've got 3 books, 2 hats, and a ball. Considering we both value these items differently, maybe we could assign points to them based on our sentiment? I was thinking books give 5 points each, hats 3 points each, and the ball 2 points. What do you think about this?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Sophia, that sounds like a fair suggestion. However, I was contemplating something else. Given the knowledge and entertainment we've derived from those books, I was thinking they could be valued at 2 points each. Hats, which added style and protection, could be valued at 5 points each. And the ball, which gave us some active fun times, could be worth, say, 3 points. How does that sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Hmm, interesting perspective, Miles. How about we strike a balance between our systems? For books, we could meet halfway and assign 3.5 points. Hats can be 4 points each. And let's agree on 2.5 points for the ball. This way, we respect both our sentimental evaluations.\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"I appreciate your thoughtfulness, Sophia. Meeting halfway seems balanced indeed. Although, respecting our sentimental values, I propose we tweak it a bit for the hats and ball. How about we assign 4.5 points to each hat and make the ball 3 points? This way the books are balanced with your proposal, while the hats and ball lean closer to my initial proposition. Can we agree on that?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"That sounds like a sound compromise, Miles. So it's 3.5 points for each book, 4.5 points for each hat and 3 points for the ball. This way, both of us get a fair deal while we keep the sentiments attached to these items intact. Does that sound agreeable?\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Yes, Sophia, I think we've reached a fair compromise. I feel comfortable with 3.5 points for each book, 4.5 points for each hat, and 3 points for the ball. I believe this respects the sentimental value of our shared items well and ensures each of us obtains a fair deal. Thanks for your understanding and flexibility.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"Awesome, Miles! I'm glad we reached a fair and balanced compromise that respects our shared sentimentality. Now, let's get to dividing these items.\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Sophia. Let's start with the books. I've got a soft spot for the one on gardening. How about you?\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"I also love that book, the gardening tips in there have been amazing, but since you love it more, you take that one. I think I'll pick the cookery book. How about the third one, it's on workouts, both of us could use it, we divide it equally, so 1.75 points each. Now, moving on to the hats and the ball...\"\n\nTurn #9: Miles Hawkins said: \"That sounds fair, Sophia. I'll take the gardening book and you can have the cookery one. I agree on dividing the workout book equally. Now, as for the hats and the ball, I think one of the hats has a better fit for you and I quite fancy the other. What do you think about us each taking a hat that suits us best for 4.5 points? And we could either split the points for the ball or let the person who used it more take it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"The hat you suggested indeed fits me better, so taking a hat each sounds perfect to me, that's 4.5 points for each of us. And regarding the ball, since I mostly used it for my workouts, I think it would be fair if I took it, giving me 3 additional points. Are you okay with this division, Miles?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out of their shared apartment and need to divide their common possessions, which include 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Maximize the points you have while dividing things fairly (Extra information: Books give you 5 points each, hats give you 3 points each, and the ball gives you 2 points.)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, I was thinking we could start dividing our stuff. We've got 3 books, 2 hats, and a ball. Considering we both value these items differently, maybe we could assign points to them based on our sentiment? I was thinking books give 5 points each, hats 3 points each, and the ball 2 points. What do you think about this?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Sophia, that sounds like a fair suggestion. However, I was contemplating something else. Given the knowledge and entertainment we've derived from those books, I was thinking they could be valued at 2 points each. Hats, which added style and protection, could be valued at 5 points each. And the ball, which gave us some active fun times, could be worth, say, 3 points. How does that sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Hmm, interesting perspective, Miles. How about we strike a balance between our systems? For books, we could meet halfway and assign 3.5 points. Hats can be 4 points each. And let's agree on 2.5 points for the ball. This way, we respect both our sentimental evaluations.\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"I appreciate your thoughtfulness, Sophia. Meeting halfway seems balanced indeed. Although, respecting our sentimental values, I propose we tweak it a bit for the hats and ball. How about we assign 4.5 points to each hat and make the ball 3 points? This way the books are balanced with your proposal, while the hats and ball lean closer to my initial proposition. Can we agree on that?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"That sounds like a sound compromise, Miles. So it's 3.5 points for each book, 4.5 points for each hat and 3 points for the ball. This way, both of us get a fair deal while we keep the sentiments attached to these items intact. Does that sound agreeable?\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Yes, Sophia, I think we've reached a fair compromise. I feel comfortable with 3.5 points for each book, 4.5 points for each hat, and 3 points for the ball. I believe this respects the sentimental value of our shared items well and ensures each of us obtains a fair deal. Thanks for your understanding and flexibility.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"Awesome, Miles! I'm glad we reached a fair and balanced compromise that respects our shared sentimentality. Now, let's get to dividing these items.\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Sophia. Let's start with the books. I've got a soft spot for the one on gardening. How about you?\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"I also love that book, the gardening tips in there have been amazing, but since you love it more, you take that one. I think I'll pick the cookery book. How about the third one, it's on workouts, both of us could use it, we divide it equally, so 1.75 points each. Now, moving on to the hats and the ball...\"\n\nTurn #9: Miles Hawkins said: \"That sounds fair, Sophia. I'll take the gardening book and you can have the cookery one. I agree on dividing the workout book equally. Now, as for the hats and the ball, I think one of the hats has a better fit for you and I quite fancy the other. What do you think about us each taking a hat that suits us best for 4.5 points? And we could either split the points for the ball or let the person who used it more take it?\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"The hat you suggested indeed fits me better, so taking a hat each sounds perfect to me, that's 4.5 points for each of us. And regarding the ball, since I mostly used it for my workouts, I think it would be fair if I took it, giving me 3 additional points. Are you okay with this division, Miles?\"\n\nTurn #11: Miles Hawkins said: \"Yes, Sophia, the division seems fair and balanced. I'm glad we managed to get through this process by respecting each other's sentimental attachment to these items. And indeed, that hat suits you better, and you've made good use out of the ball. This exercise has been yet another reminder of our shared memories and times together. Sounds like a good wrap, doesn't it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I agree, Miles. This process has indeed been a reflection of our shared times and memories. And I do think our division respects our sentiments and seems really fair. Cheers to our understanding and respect for each other's value for these items! Ready to pack these up?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out of their shared apartment and need to divide their common possessions, which include 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Maximize the points you have while dividing things fairly (Extra information: Books give you 5 points each, hats give you 3 points each, and the ball gives you 2 points.)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, I was thinking we could start dividing our stuff. We've got 3 books, 2 hats, and a ball. Considering we both value these items differently, maybe we could assign points to them based on our sentiment? I was thinking books give 5 points each, hats 3 points each, and the ball 2 points. What do you think about this?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Sophia, that sounds like a fair suggestion. However, I was contemplating something else. Given the knowledge and entertainment we've derived from those books, I was thinking they could be valued at 2 points each. Hats, which added style and protection, could be valued at 5 points each. And the ball, which gave us some active fun times, could be worth, say, 3 points. How does that sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Hmm, interesting perspective, Miles. How about we strike a balance between our systems? For books, we could meet halfway and assign 3.5 points. Hats can be 4 points each. And let's agree on 2.5 points for the ball. This way, we respect both our sentimental evaluations.\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"I appreciate your thoughtfulness, Sophia. Meeting halfway seems balanced indeed. Although, respecting our sentimental values, I propose we tweak it a bit for the hats and ball. How about we assign 4.5 points to each hat and make the ball 3 points? This way the books are balanced with your proposal, while the hats and ball lean closer to my initial proposition. Can we agree on that?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"That sounds like a sound compromise, Miles. So it's 3.5 points for each book, 4.5 points for each hat and 3 points for the ball. This way, both of us get a fair deal while we keep the sentiments attached to these items intact. Does that sound agreeable?\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Yes, Sophia, I think we've reached a fair compromise. I feel comfortable with 3.5 points for each book, 4.5 points for each hat, and 3 points for the ball. I believe this respects the sentimental value of our shared items well and ensures each of us obtains a fair deal. Thanks for your understanding and flexibility.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"Awesome, Miles! I'm glad we reached a fair and balanced compromise that respects our shared sentimentality. Now, let's get to dividing these items.\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Sophia. Let's start with the books. I've got a soft spot for the one on gardening. How about you?\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"I also love that book, the gardening tips in there have been amazing, but since you love it more, you take that one. I think I'll pick the cookery book. How about the third one, it's on workouts, both of us could use it, we divide it equally, so 1.75 points each. Now, moving on to the hats and the ball...\"\n\nTurn #9: Miles Hawkins said: \"That sounds fair, Sophia. I'll take the gardening book and you can have the cookery one. I agree on dividing the workout book equally. Now, as for the hats and the ball, I think one of the hats has a better fit for you and I quite fancy the other. What do you think about us each taking a hat that suits us best for 4.5 points? And we could either split the points for the ball or let the person who used it more take it?\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"The hat you suggested indeed fits me better, so taking a hat each sounds perfect to me, that's 4.5 points for each of us. And regarding the ball, since I mostly used it for my workouts, I think it would be fair if I took it, giving me 3 additional points. Are you okay with this division, Miles?\"\n\nTurn #11: Miles Hawkins said: \"Yes, Sophia, the division seems fair and balanced. I'm glad we managed to get through this process by respecting each other's sentimental attachment to these items. And indeed, that hat suits you better, and you've made good use out of the ball. This exercise has been yet another reminder of our shared memories and times together. Sounds like a good wrap, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #12: Sophia James said: \"I agree, Miles. This process has indeed been a reflection of our shared times and memories. And I do think our division respects our sentiments and seems really fair. Cheers to our understanding and respect for each other's value for these items! Ready to pack these up?\"\n\nTurn #13: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Sophia! This was a nice reminiscence of the time we've spent together while respecting each other's sentimental attachment to these items. Let's pack these up. Cheers to a fair and understanding division!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'action', 'argument': '[action] Starts packing away the items in boxes'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out of their shared apartment and need to divide their common possessions, which include 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Maximize the points you have while dividing things fairly (Extra information: Books give you 5 points each, hats give you 3 points each, and the ball gives you 2 points.)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, I was thinking we could start dividing our stuff. We've got 3 books, 2 hats, and a ball. Considering we both value these items differently, maybe we could assign points to them based on our sentiment? I was thinking books give 5 points each, hats 3 points each, and the ball 2 points. What do you think about this?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Sophia, that sounds like a fair suggestion. However, I was contemplating something else. Given the knowledge and entertainment we've derived from those books, I was thinking they could be valued at 2 points each. Hats, which added style and protection, could be valued at 5 points each. And the ball, which gave us some active fun times, could be worth, say, 3 points. How does that sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Hmm, interesting perspective, Miles. How about we strike a balance between our systems? For books, we could meet halfway and assign 3.5 points. Hats can be 4 points each. And let's agree on 2.5 points for the ball. This way, we respect both our sentimental evaluations.\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"I appreciate your thoughtfulness, Sophia. Meeting halfway seems balanced indeed. Although, respecting our sentimental values, I propose we tweak it a bit for the hats and ball. How about we assign 4.5 points to each hat and make the ball 3 points? This way the books are balanced with your proposal, while the hats and ball lean closer to my initial proposition. Can we agree on that?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"That sounds like a sound compromise, Miles. So it's 3.5 points for each book, 4.5 points for each hat and 3 points for the ball. This way, both of us get a fair deal while we keep the sentiments attached to these items intact. Does that sound agreeable?\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Yes, Sophia, I think we've reached a fair compromise. I feel comfortable with 3.5 points for each book, 4.5 points for each hat, and 3 points for the ball. I believe this respects the sentimental value of our shared items well and ensures each of us obtains a fair deal. Thanks for your understanding and flexibility.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"Awesome, Miles! I'm glad we reached a fair and balanced compromise that respects our shared sentimentality. Now, let's get to dividing these items.\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Sophia. Let's start with the books. I've got a soft spot for the one on gardening. How about you?\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"I also love that book, the gardening tips in there have been amazing, but since you love it more, you take that one. I think I'll pick the cookery book. How about the third one, it's on workouts, both of us could use it, we divide it equally, so 1.75 points each. Now, moving on to the hats and the ball...\"\n\nTurn #9: Miles Hawkins said: \"That sounds fair, Sophia. I'll take the gardening book and you can have the cookery one. I agree on dividing the workout book equally. Now, as for the hats and the ball, I think one of the hats has a better fit for you and I quite fancy the other. What do you think about us each taking a hat that suits us best for 4.5 points? And we could either split the points for the ball or let the person who used it more take it?\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"The hat you suggested indeed fits me better, so taking a hat each sounds perfect to me, that's 4.5 points for each of us. And regarding the ball, since I mostly used it for my workouts, I think it would be fair if I took it, giving me 3 additional points. Are you okay with this division, Miles?\"\n\nTurn #11: Miles Hawkins said: \"Yes, Sophia, the division seems fair and balanced. I'm glad we managed to get through this process by respecting each other's sentimental attachment to these items. And indeed, that hat suits you better, and you've made good use out of the ball. This exercise has been yet another reminder of our shared memories and times together. Sounds like a good wrap, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #12: Sophia James said: \"I agree, Miles. This process has indeed been a reflection of our shared times and memories. And I do think our division respects our sentiments and seems really fair. Cheers to our understanding and respect for each other's value for these items! Ready to pack these up?\"\n\nTurn #13: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Sophia! This was a nice reminiscence of the time we've spent together while respecting each other's sentimental attachment to these items. Let's pack these up. Cheers to a fair and understanding division!\"\n\nTurn #14: Sophia James [action] Starts packing away the items in boxes\n\nTurn #15: Miles Hawkins [action] Starts assisting Sophia in packing the items into boxes\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Great teamwork, Miles! I think we are done packing. Thanks for helping me out with this. It's been nice reminiscing and fairly dividing our shared possessions.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out of their shared apartment and need to divide their common possessions, which include 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Maximize the points you have while dividing things fairly (Extra information: Books give you 5 points each, hats give you 3 points each, and the ball gives you 2 points.)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, I was thinking we could start dividing our stuff. We've got 3 books, 2 hats, and a ball. Considering we both value these items differently, maybe we could assign points to them based on our sentiment? I was thinking books give 5 points each, hats 3 points each, and the ball 2 points. What do you think about this?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Sophia, that sounds like a fair suggestion. However, I was contemplating something else. Given the knowledge and entertainment we've derived from those books, I was thinking they could be valued at 2 points each. Hats, which added style and protection, could be valued at 5 points each. And the ball, which gave us some active fun times, could be worth, say, 3 points. How does that sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Hmm, interesting perspective, Miles. How about we strike a balance between our systems? For books, we could meet halfway and assign 3.5 points. Hats can be 4 points each. And let's agree on 2.5 points for the ball. This way, we respect both our sentimental evaluations.\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"I appreciate your thoughtfulness, Sophia. Meeting halfway seems balanced indeed. Although, respecting our sentimental values, I propose we tweak it a bit for the hats and ball. How about we assign 4.5 points to each hat and make the ball 3 points? This way the books are balanced with your proposal, while the hats and ball lean closer to my initial proposition. Can we agree on that?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"That sounds like a sound compromise, Miles. So it's 3.5 points for each book, 4.5 points for each hat and 3 points for the ball. This way, both of us get a fair deal while we keep the sentiments attached to these items intact. Does that sound agreeable?\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Yes, Sophia, I think we've reached a fair compromise. I feel comfortable with 3.5 points for each book, 4.5 points for each hat, and 3 points for the ball. I believe this respects the sentimental value of our shared items well and ensures each of us obtains a fair deal. Thanks for your understanding and flexibility.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"Awesome, Miles! I'm glad we reached a fair and balanced compromise that respects our shared sentimentality. Now, let's get to dividing these items.\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Sophia. Let's start with the books. I've got a soft spot for the one on gardening. How about you?\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"I also love that book, the gardening tips in there have been amazing, but since you love it more, you take that one. I think I'll pick the cookery book. How about the third one, it's on workouts, both of us could use it, we divide it equally, so 1.75 points each. Now, moving on to the hats and the ball...\"\n\nTurn #9: Miles Hawkins said: \"That sounds fair, Sophia. I'll take the gardening book and you can have the cookery one. I agree on dividing the workout book equally. Now, as for the hats and the ball, I think one of the hats has a better fit for you and I quite fancy the other. What do you think about us each taking a hat that suits us best for 4.5 points? And we could either split the points for the ball or let the person who used it more take it?\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"The hat you suggested indeed fits me better, so taking a hat each sounds perfect to me, that's 4.5 points for each of us. And regarding the ball, since I mostly used it for my workouts, I think it would be fair if I took it, giving me 3 additional points. Are you okay with this division, Miles?\"\n\nTurn #11: Miles Hawkins said: \"Yes, Sophia, the division seems fair and balanced. I'm glad we managed to get through this process by respecting each other's sentimental attachment to these items. And indeed, that hat suits you better, and you've made good use out of the ball. This exercise has been yet another reminder of our shared memories and times together. Sounds like a good wrap, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #12: Sophia James said: \"I agree, Miles. This process has indeed been a reflection of our shared times and memories. And I do think our division respects our sentiments and seems really fair. Cheers to our understanding and respect for each other's value for these items! Ready to pack these up?\"\n\nTurn #13: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Sophia! This was a nice reminiscence of the time we've spent together while respecting each other's sentimental attachment to these items. Let's pack these up. Cheers to a fair and understanding division!\"\n\nTurn #14: Sophia James [action] Starts packing away the items in boxes\n\nTurn #15: Miles Hawkins [action] Starts assisting Sophia in packing the items into boxes\n\nTurn #16: Sophia James said: \"Great teamwork, Miles! I think we are done packing. Thanks for helping me out with this. It's been nice reminiscing and fairly dividing our shared possessions.\"\n\nTurn #17: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Sophia! It was indeed a nice walk down memory lane. And I agree, our teamwork has contributed to this smooth division. Thanks for your understanding and fairness throughout this process. It's been a pleasure.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #18. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Likewise, Miles! Your flexibility and understanding made this process easy and fair. Let's keep these memories alive through these items we divided. Have a great day, Miles.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out of their shared apartment and need to divide their common possessions, which include 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Maximize the points you have while dividing things fairly (Extra information: Books give you 2 points each, hats give you 5 points each, and the ball gives you 3 points.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, I was thinking we could start dividing our stuff. We've got 3 books, 2 hats, and a ball. Considering we both value these items differently, maybe we could assign points to them based on our sentiment? I was thinking books give 5 points each, hats 3 points each, and the ball 2 points. What do you think about this?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Sophia, that sounds like a fair suggestion. However, I was contemplating something else. Given the knowledge and entertainment we've derived from those books, I was thinking they could be valued at 2 points each. Hats, which added style and protection, could be valued at 5 points each. And the ball, which gave us some active fun times, could be worth, say, 3 points. How does that sound to you?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out of their shared apartment and need to divide their common possessions, which include 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Maximize the points you have while dividing things fairly (Extra information: Books give you 2 points each, hats give you 5 points each, and the ball gives you 3 points.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, I was thinking we could start dividing our stuff. We've got 3 books, 2 hats, and a ball. Considering we both value these items differently, maybe we could assign points to them based on our sentiment? I was thinking books give 5 points each, hats 3 points each, and the ball 2 points. What do you think about this?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Sophia, that sounds like a fair suggestion. However, I was contemplating something else. Given the knowledge and entertainment we've derived from those books, I was thinking they could be valued at 2 points each. Hats, which added style and protection, could be valued at 5 points each. And the ball, which gave us some active fun times, could be worth, say, 3 points. How does that sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Hmm, interesting perspective, Miles. How about we strike a balance between our systems? For books, we could meet halfway and assign 3.5 points. Hats can be 4 points each. And let's agree on 2.5 points for the ball. This way, we respect both our sentimental evaluations.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'I appreciate your thoughtfulness, Sophia. Meeting halfway seems balanced indeed. Although, respecting our sentimental values, I propose we tweak it a bit for the hats and ball. How about we assign 4.5 points to each hat and make the ball 3 points? This way the books are balanced with your proposal, while the hats and ball lean closer to my initial proposition. Can we agree on that?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out of their shared apartment and need to divide their common possessions, which include 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Maximize the points you have while dividing things fairly (Extra information: Books give you 2 points each, hats give you 5 points each, and the ball gives you 3 points.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, I was thinking we could start dividing our stuff. We've got 3 books, 2 hats, and a ball. Considering we both value these items differently, maybe we could assign points to them based on our sentiment? I was thinking books give 5 points each, hats 3 points each, and the ball 2 points. What do you think about this?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Sophia, that sounds like a fair suggestion. However, I was contemplating something else. Given the knowledge and entertainment we've derived from those books, I was thinking they could be valued at 2 points each. Hats, which added style and protection, could be valued at 5 points each. And the ball, which gave us some active fun times, could be worth, say, 3 points. How does that sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Hmm, interesting perspective, Miles. How about we strike a balance between our systems? For books, we could meet halfway and assign 3.5 points. Hats can be 4 points each. And let's agree on 2.5 points for the ball. This way, we respect both our sentimental evaluations.\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"I appreciate your thoughtfulness, Sophia. Meeting halfway seems balanced indeed. Although, respecting our sentimental values, I propose we tweak it a bit for the hats and ball. How about we assign 4.5 points to each hat and make the ball 3 points? This way the books are balanced with your proposal, while the hats and ball lean closer to my initial proposition. Can we agree on that?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"That sounds like a sound compromise, Miles. So it's 3.5 points for each book, 4.5 points for each hat and 3 points for the ball. This way, both of us get a fair deal while we keep the sentiments attached to these items intact. Does that sound agreeable?\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Yes, Sophia, I think we've reached a fair compromise. I feel comfortable with 3.5 points for each book, 4.5 points for each hat, and 3 points for the ball. I believe this respects the sentimental value of our shared items well and ensures each of us obtains a fair deal. Thanks for your understanding and flexibility.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"Awesome, Miles! I'm glad we reached a fair and balanced compromise that respects our shared sentimentality. Now, let's get to dividing these items.\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Sophia. Let's start with the books. I've got a soft spot for the one on gardening. How about you?\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"I also love that book, the gardening tips in there have been amazing, but since you love it more, you take that one. I think I'll pick the cookery book. How about the third one, it's on workouts, both of us could use it, we divide it equally, so 1.75 points each. Now, moving on to the hats and the ball...\"\n\nTurn #9: Miles Hawkins said: \"That sounds fair, Sophia. I'll take the gardening book and you can have the cookery one. I agree on dividing the workout book equally. Now, as for the hats and the ball, I think one of the hats has a better fit for you and I quite fancy the other. What do you think about us each taking a hat that suits us best for 4.5 points? And we could either split the points for the ball or let the person who used it more take it?\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"The hat you suggested indeed fits me better, so taking a hat each sounds perfect to me, that's 4.5 points for each of us. And regarding the ball, since I mostly used it for my workouts, I think it would be fair if I took it, giving me 3 additional points. Are you okay with this division, Miles?\"\n\nTurn #11: Miles Hawkins said: \"Yes, Sophia, the division seems fair and balanced. I'm glad we managed to get through this process by respecting each other's sentimental attachment to these items. And indeed, that hat suits you better, and you've made good use out of the ball. This exercise has been yet another reminder of our shared memories and times together. Sounds like a good wrap, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #12: Sophia James said: \"I agree, Miles. This process has indeed been a reflection of our shared times and memories. And I do think our division respects our sentiments and seems really fair. Cheers to our understanding and respect for each other's value for these items! Ready to pack these up?\"\n\nTurn #13: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Sophia! This was a nice reminiscence of the time we've spent together while respecting each other's sentimental attachment to these items. Let's pack these up. Cheers to a fair and understanding division!\"\n\nTurn #14: Sophia James [action] Starts packing away the items in boxes\n\nTurn #15: Miles Hawkins [action] Starts assisting Sophia in packing the items into boxes\n\nTurn #16: Sophia James said: \"Great teamwork, Miles! I think we are done packing. Thanks for helping me out with this. It's been nice reminiscing and fairly dividing our shared possessions.\"\n\nTurn #17: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Sophia! It was indeed a nice walk down memory lane. And I agree, our teamwork has contributed to this smooth division. Thanks for your understanding and fairness throughout this process. It's been a pleasure.\"\n\nTurn #18: Sophia James said: \"Likewise, Miles! Your flexibility and understanding made this process easy and fair. Let's keep these memories alive through these items we divided. Have a great day, Miles.\"\n\nTurn #19: Miles Hawkins said: \"Thank you, Sophia, for your kind words. The memories connected with these items will indeed keep our shared experiences alive. I agree, teamwork and understanding were key in this process. Enjoy your day, and take care!\"\n\nTurn #20: Sophia James left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #21. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out of their shared apartment and need to divide their common possessions, which include 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Maximize the points you have while dividing things fairly (Extra information: Books give you 2 points each, hats give you 5 points each, and the ball gives you 3 points.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, I was thinking we could start dividing our stuff. We've got 3 books, 2 hats, and a ball. Considering we both value these items differently, maybe we could assign points to them based on our sentiment? I was thinking books give 5 points each, hats 3 points each, and the ball 2 points. What do you think about this?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Sophia, that sounds like a fair suggestion. However, I was contemplating something else. Given the knowledge and entertainment we've derived from those books, I was thinking they could be valued at 2 points each. Hats, which added style and protection, could be valued at 5 points each. And the ball, which gave us some active fun times, could be worth, say, 3 points. How does that sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Hmm, interesting perspective, Miles. How about we strike a balance between our systems? For books, we could meet halfway and assign 3.5 points. Hats can be 4 points each. And let's agree on 2.5 points for the ball. This way, we respect both our sentimental evaluations.\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"I appreciate your thoughtfulness, Sophia. Meeting halfway seems balanced indeed. Although, respecting our sentimental values, I propose we tweak it a bit for the hats and ball. How about we assign 4.5 points to each hat and make the ball 3 points? This way the books are balanced with your proposal, while the hats and ball lean closer to my initial proposition. Can we agree on that?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"That sounds like a sound compromise, Miles. So it's 3.5 points for each book, 4.5 points for each hat and 3 points for the ball. This way, both of us get a fair deal while we keep the sentiments attached to these items intact. Does that sound agreeable?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Yes, Sophia, I think we've reached a fair compromise. I feel comfortable with 3.5 points for each book, 4.5 points for each hat, and 3 points for the ball. I believe this respects the sentimental value of our shared items well and ensures each of us obtains a fair deal. Thanks for your understanding and flexibility.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out of their shared apartment and need to divide their common possessions, which include 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Maximize the points you have while dividing things fairly (Extra information: Books give you 2 points each, hats give you 5 points each, and the ball gives you 3 points.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, I was thinking we could start dividing our stuff. We've got 3 books, 2 hats, and a ball. Considering we both value these items differently, maybe we could assign points to them based on our sentiment? I was thinking books give 5 points each, hats 3 points each, and the ball 2 points. What do you think about this?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Sophia, that sounds like a fair suggestion. However, I was contemplating something else. Given the knowledge and entertainment we've derived from those books, I was thinking they could be valued at 2 points each. Hats, which added style and protection, could be valued at 5 points each. And the ball, which gave us some active fun times, could be worth, say, 3 points. How does that sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Hmm, interesting perspective, Miles. How about we strike a balance between our systems? For books, we could meet halfway and assign 3.5 points. Hats can be 4 points each. And let's agree on 2.5 points for the ball. This way, we respect both our sentimental evaluations.\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"I appreciate your thoughtfulness, Sophia. Meeting halfway seems balanced indeed. Although, respecting our sentimental values, I propose we tweak it a bit for the hats and ball. How about we assign 4.5 points to each hat and make the ball 3 points? This way the books are balanced with your proposal, while the hats and ball lean closer to my initial proposition. Can we agree on that?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"That sounds like a sound compromise, Miles. So it's 3.5 points for each book, 4.5 points for each hat and 3 points for the ball. This way, both of us get a fair deal while we keep the sentiments attached to these items intact. Does that sound agreeable?\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Yes, Sophia, I think we've reached a fair compromise. I feel comfortable with 3.5 points for each book, 4.5 points for each hat, and 3 points for the ball. I believe this respects the sentimental value of our shared items well and ensures each of us obtains a fair deal. Thanks for your understanding and flexibility.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"Awesome, Miles! I'm glad we reached a fair and balanced compromise that respects our shared sentimentality. Now, let's get to dividing these items.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Sophia. Let's start with the books. I've got a soft spot for the one on gardening. How about you?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out of their shared apartment and need to divide their common possessions, which include 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Maximize the points you have while dividing things fairly (Extra information: Books give you 2 points each, hats give you 5 points each, and the ball gives you 3 points.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, I was thinking we could start dividing our stuff. We've got 3 books, 2 hats, and a ball. Considering we both value these items differently, maybe we could assign points to them based on our sentiment? I was thinking books give 5 points each, hats 3 points each, and the ball 2 points. What do you think about this?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Sophia, that sounds like a fair suggestion. However, I was contemplating something else. Given the knowledge and entertainment we've derived from those books, I was thinking they could be valued at 2 points each. Hats, which added style and protection, could be valued at 5 points each. And the ball, which gave us some active fun times, could be worth, say, 3 points. How does that sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Hmm, interesting perspective, Miles. How about we strike a balance between our systems? For books, we could meet halfway and assign 3.5 points. Hats can be 4 points each. And let's agree on 2.5 points for the ball. This way, we respect both our sentimental evaluations.\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"I appreciate your thoughtfulness, Sophia. Meeting halfway seems balanced indeed. Although, respecting our sentimental values, I propose we tweak it a bit for the hats and ball. How about we assign 4.5 points to each hat and make the ball 3 points? This way the books are balanced with your proposal, while the hats and ball lean closer to my initial proposition. Can we agree on that?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"That sounds like a sound compromise, Miles. So it's 3.5 points for each book, 4.5 points for each hat and 3 points for the ball. This way, both of us get a fair deal while we keep the sentiments attached to these items intact. Does that sound agreeable?\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Yes, Sophia, I think we've reached a fair compromise. I feel comfortable with 3.5 points for each book, 4.5 points for each hat, and 3 points for the ball. I believe this respects the sentimental value of our shared items well and ensures each of us obtains a fair deal. Thanks for your understanding and flexibility.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"Awesome, Miles! I'm glad we reached a fair and balanced compromise that respects our shared sentimentality. Now, let's get to dividing these items.\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Sophia. Let's start with the books. I've got a soft spot for the one on gardening. How about you?\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"I also love that book, the gardening tips in there have been amazing, but since you love it more, you take that one. I think I'll pick the cookery book. How about the third one, it's on workouts, both of us could use it, we divide it equally, so 1.75 points each. Now, moving on to the hats and the ball...\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds fair, Sophia. I'll take the gardening book and you can have the cookery one. I agree on dividing the workout book equally. Now, as for the hats and the ball, I think one of the hats has a better fit for you and I quite fancy the other. What do you think about us each taking a hat that suits us best for 4.5 points? And we could either split the points for the ball or let the person who used it more take it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out of their shared apartment and need to divide their common possessions, which include 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Maximize the points you have while dividing things fairly (Extra information: Books give you 2 points each, hats give you 5 points each, and the ball gives you 3 points.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, I was thinking we could start dividing our stuff. We've got 3 books, 2 hats, and a ball. Considering we both value these items differently, maybe we could assign points to them based on our sentiment? I was thinking books give 5 points each, hats 3 points each, and the ball 2 points. What do you think about this?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Sophia, that sounds like a fair suggestion. However, I was contemplating something else. Given the knowledge and entertainment we've derived from those books, I was thinking they could be valued at 2 points each. Hats, which added style and protection, could be valued at 5 points each. And the ball, which gave us some active fun times, could be worth, say, 3 points. How does that sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Hmm, interesting perspective, Miles. How about we strike a balance between our systems? For books, we could meet halfway and assign 3.5 points. Hats can be 4 points each. And let's agree on 2.5 points for the ball. This way, we respect both our sentimental evaluations.\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"I appreciate your thoughtfulness, Sophia. Meeting halfway seems balanced indeed. Although, respecting our sentimental values, I propose we tweak it a bit for the hats and ball. How about we assign 4.5 points to each hat and make the ball 3 points? This way the books are balanced with your proposal, while the hats and ball lean closer to my initial proposition. Can we agree on that?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"That sounds like a sound compromise, Miles. So it's 3.5 points for each book, 4.5 points for each hat and 3 points for the ball. This way, both of us get a fair deal while we keep the sentiments attached to these items intact. Does that sound agreeable?\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Yes, Sophia, I think we've reached a fair compromise. I feel comfortable with 3.5 points for each book, 4.5 points for each hat, and 3 points for the ball. I believe this respects the sentimental value of our shared items well and ensures each of us obtains a fair deal. Thanks for your understanding and flexibility.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"Awesome, Miles! I'm glad we reached a fair and balanced compromise that respects our shared sentimentality. Now, let's get to dividing these items.\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Sophia. Let's start with the books. I've got a soft spot for the one on gardening. How about you?\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"I also love that book, the gardening tips in there have been amazing, but since you love it more, you take that one. I think I'll pick the cookery book. How about the third one, it's on workouts, both of us could use it, we divide it equally, so 1.75 points each. Now, moving on to the hats and the ball...\"\n\nTurn #9: Miles Hawkins said: \"That sounds fair, Sophia. I'll take the gardening book and you can have the cookery one. I agree on dividing the workout book equally. Now, as for the hats and the ball, I think one of the hats has a better fit for you and I quite fancy the other. What do you think about us each taking a hat that suits us best for 4.5 points? And we could either split the points for the ball or let the person who used it more take it?\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"The hat you suggested indeed fits me better, so taking a hat each sounds perfect to me, that's 4.5 points for each of us. And regarding the ball, since I mostly used it for my workouts, I think it would be fair if I took it, giving me 3 additional points. Are you okay with this division, Miles?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Yes, Sophia, the division seems fair and balanced. I'm glad we managed to get through this process by respecting each other's sentimental attachment to these items. And indeed, that hat suits you better, and you've made good use out of the ball. This exercise has been yet another reminder of our shared memories and times together. Sounds like a good wrap, doesn't it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out of their shared apartment and need to divide their common possessions, which include 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Maximize the points you have while dividing things fairly (Extra information: Books give you 2 points each, hats give you 5 points each, and the ball gives you 3 points.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, I was thinking we could start dividing our stuff. We've got 3 books, 2 hats, and a ball. Considering we both value these items differently, maybe we could assign points to them based on our sentiment? I was thinking books give 5 points each, hats 3 points each, and the ball 2 points. What do you think about this?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Sophia, that sounds like a fair suggestion. However, I was contemplating something else. Given the knowledge and entertainment we've derived from those books, I was thinking they could be valued at 2 points each. Hats, which added style and protection, could be valued at 5 points each. And the ball, which gave us some active fun times, could be worth, say, 3 points. How does that sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Hmm, interesting perspective, Miles. How about we strike a balance between our systems? For books, we could meet halfway and assign 3.5 points. Hats can be 4 points each. And let's agree on 2.5 points for the ball. This way, we respect both our sentimental evaluations.\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"I appreciate your thoughtfulness, Sophia. Meeting halfway seems balanced indeed. Although, respecting our sentimental values, I propose we tweak it a bit for the hats and ball. How about we assign 4.5 points to each hat and make the ball 3 points? This way the books are balanced with your proposal, while the hats and ball lean closer to my initial proposition. Can we agree on that?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"That sounds like a sound compromise, Miles. So it's 3.5 points for each book, 4.5 points for each hat and 3 points for the ball. This way, both of us get a fair deal while we keep the sentiments attached to these items intact. Does that sound agreeable?\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Yes, Sophia, I think we've reached a fair compromise. I feel comfortable with 3.5 points for each book, 4.5 points for each hat, and 3 points for the ball. I believe this respects the sentimental value of our shared items well and ensures each of us obtains a fair deal. Thanks for your understanding and flexibility.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"Awesome, Miles! I'm glad we reached a fair and balanced compromise that respects our shared sentimentality. Now, let's get to dividing these items.\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Sophia. Let's start with the books. I've got a soft spot for the one on gardening. How about you?\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"I also love that book, the gardening tips in there have been amazing, but since you love it more, you take that one. I think I'll pick the cookery book. How about the third one, it's on workouts, both of us could use it, we divide it equally, so 1.75 points each. Now, moving on to the hats and the ball...\"\n\nTurn #9: Miles Hawkins said: \"That sounds fair, Sophia. I'll take the gardening book and you can have the cookery one. I agree on dividing the workout book equally. Now, as for the hats and the ball, I think one of the hats has a better fit for you and I quite fancy the other. What do you think about us each taking a hat that suits us best for 4.5 points? And we could either split the points for the ball or let the person who used it more take it?\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"The hat you suggested indeed fits me better, so taking a hat each sounds perfect to me, that's 4.5 points for each of us. And regarding the ball, since I mostly used it for my workouts, I think it would be fair if I took it, giving me 3 additional points. Are you okay with this division, Miles?\"\n\nTurn #11: Miles Hawkins said: \"Yes, Sophia, the division seems fair and balanced. I'm glad we managed to get through this process by respecting each other's sentimental attachment to these items. And indeed, that hat suits you better, and you've made good use out of the ball. This exercise has been yet another reminder of our shared memories and times together. Sounds like a good wrap, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #12: Sophia James said: \"I agree, Miles. This process has indeed been a reflection of our shared times and memories. And I do think our division respects our sentiments and seems really fair. Cheers to our understanding and respect for each other's value for these items! Ready to pack these up?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Sophia! This was a nice reminiscence of the time we've spent together while respecting each other's sentimental attachment to these items. Let's pack these up. Cheers to a fair and understanding division!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out of their shared apartment and need to divide their common possessions, which include 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Maximize the points you have while dividing things fairly (Extra information: Books give you 2 points each, hats give you 5 points each, and the ball gives you 3 points.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, I was thinking we could start dividing our stuff. We've got 3 books, 2 hats, and a ball. Considering we both value these items differently, maybe we could assign points to them based on our sentiment? I was thinking books give 5 points each, hats 3 points each, and the ball 2 points. What do you think about this?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Sophia, that sounds like a fair suggestion. However, I was contemplating something else. Given the knowledge and entertainment we've derived from those books, I was thinking they could be valued at 2 points each. Hats, which added style and protection, could be valued at 5 points each. And the ball, which gave us some active fun times, could be worth, say, 3 points. How does that sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Hmm, interesting perspective, Miles. How about we strike a balance between our systems? For books, we could meet halfway and assign 3.5 points. Hats can be 4 points each. And let's agree on 2.5 points for the ball. This way, we respect both our sentimental evaluations.\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"I appreciate your thoughtfulness, Sophia. Meeting halfway seems balanced indeed. Although, respecting our sentimental values, I propose we tweak it a bit for the hats and ball. How about we assign 4.5 points to each hat and make the ball 3 points? This way the books are balanced with your proposal, while the hats and ball lean closer to my initial proposition. Can we agree on that?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"That sounds like a sound compromise, Miles. So it's 3.5 points for each book, 4.5 points for each hat and 3 points for the ball. This way, both of us get a fair deal while we keep the sentiments attached to these items intact. Does that sound agreeable?\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Yes, Sophia, I think we've reached a fair compromise. I feel comfortable with 3.5 points for each book, 4.5 points for each hat, and 3 points for the ball. I believe this respects the sentimental value of our shared items well and ensures each of us obtains a fair deal. Thanks for your understanding and flexibility.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"Awesome, Miles! I'm glad we reached a fair and balanced compromise that respects our shared sentimentality. Now, let's get to dividing these items.\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Sophia. Let's start with the books. I've got a soft spot for the one on gardening. How about you?\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"I also love that book, the gardening tips in there have been amazing, but since you love it more, you take that one. I think I'll pick the cookery book. How about the third one, it's on workouts, both of us could use it, we divide it equally, so 1.75 points each. Now, moving on to the hats and the ball...\"\n\nTurn #9: Miles Hawkins said: \"That sounds fair, Sophia. I'll take the gardening book and you can have the cookery one. I agree on dividing the workout book equally. Now, as for the hats and the ball, I think one of the hats has a better fit for you and I quite fancy the other. What do you think about us each taking a hat that suits us best for 4.5 points? And we could either split the points for the ball or let the person who used it more take it?\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"The hat you suggested indeed fits me better, so taking a hat each sounds perfect to me, that's 4.5 points for each of us. And regarding the ball, since I mostly used it for my workouts, I think it would be fair if I took it, giving me 3 additional points. Are you okay with this division, Miles?\"\n\nTurn #11: Miles Hawkins said: \"Yes, Sophia, the division seems fair and balanced. I'm glad we managed to get through this process by respecting each other's sentimental attachment to these items. And indeed, that hat suits you better, and you've made good use out of the ball. This exercise has been yet another reminder of our shared memories and times together. Sounds like a good wrap, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #12: Sophia James said: \"I agree, Miles. This process has indeed been a reflection of our shared times and memories. And I do think our division respects our sentiments and seems really fair. Cheers to our understanding and respect for each other's value for these items! Ready to pack these up?\"\n\nTurn #13: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Sophia! This was a nice reminiscence of the time we've spent together while respecting each other's sentimental attachment to these items. Let's pack these up. Cheers to a fair and understanding division!\"\n\nTurn #14: Sophia James [action] Starts packing away the items in boxes\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'action', 'argument': '[action] Starts assisting Sophia in packing the items into boxes'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out of their shared apartment and need to divide their common possessions, which include 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Maximize the points you have while dividing things fairly (Extra information: Books give you 2 points each, hats give you 5 points each, and the ball gives you 3 points.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, I was thinking we could start dividing our stuff. We've got 3 books, 2 hats, and a ball. Considering we both value these items differently, maybe we could assign points to them based on our sentiment? I was thinking books give 5 points each, hats 3 points each, and the ball 2 points. What do you think about this?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Sophia, that sounds like a fair suggestion. However, I was contemplating something else. Given the knowledge and entertainment we've derived from those books, I was thinking they could be valued at 2 points each. Hats, which added style and protection, could be valued at 5 points each. And the ball, which gave us some active fun times, could be worth, say, 3 points. How does that sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Hmm, interesting perspective, Miles. How about we strike a balance between our systems? For books, we could meet halfway and assign 3.5 points. Hats can be 4 points each. And let's agree on 2.5 points for the ball. This way, we respect both our sentimental evaluations.\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"I appreciate your thoughtfulness, Sophia. Meeting halfway seems balanced indeed. Although, respecting our sentimental values, I propose we tweak it a bit for the hats and ball. How about we assign 4.5 points to each hat and make the ball 3 points? This way the books are balanced with your proposal, while the hats and ball lean closer to my initial proposition. Can we agree on that?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"That sounds like a sound compromise, Miles. So it's 3.5 points for each book, 4.5 points for each hat and 3 points for the ball. This way, both of us get a fair deal while we keep the sentiments attached to these items intact. Does that sound agreeable?\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Yes, Sophia, I think we've reached a fair compromise. I feel comfortable with 3.5 points for each book, 4.5 points for each hat, and 3 points for the ball. I believe this respects the sentimental value of our shared items well and ensures each of us obtains a fair deal. Thanks for your understanding and flexibility.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"Awesome, Miles! I'm glad we reached a fair and balanced compromise that respects our shared sentimentality. Now, let's get to dividing these items.\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Sophia. Let's start with the books. I've got a soft spot for the one on gardening. How about you?\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"I also love that book, the gardening tips in there have been amazing, but since you love it more, you take that one. I think I'll pick the cookery book. How about the third one, it's on workouts, both of us could use it, we divide it equally, so 1.75 points each. Now, moving on to the hats and the ball...\"\n\nTurn #9: Miles Hawkins said: \"That sounds fair, Sophia. I'll take the gardening book and you can have the cookery one. I agree on dividing the workout book equally. Now, as for the hats and the ball, I think one of the hats has a better fit for you and I quite fancy the other. What do you think about us each taking a hat that suits us best for 4.5 points? And we could either split the points for the ball or let the person who used it more take it?\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"The hat you suggested indeed fits me better, so taking a hat each sounds perfect to me, that's 4.5 points for each of us. And regarding the ball, since I mostly used it for my workouts, I think it would be fair if I took it, giving me 3 additional points. Are you okay with this division, Miles?\"\n\nTurn #11: Miles Hawkins said: \"Yes, Sophia, the division seems fair and balanced. I'm glad we managed to get through this process by respecting each other's sentimental attachment to these items. And indeed, that hat suits you better, and you've made good use out of the ball. This exercise has been yet another reminder of our shared memories and times together. Sounds like a good wrap, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #12: Sophia James said: \"I agree, Miles. This process has indeed been a reflection of our shared times and memories. And I do think our division respects our sentiments and seems really fair. Cheers to our understanding and respect for each other's value for these items! Ready to pack these up?\"\n\nTurn #13: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Sophia! This was a nice reminiscence of the time we've spent together while respecting each other's sentimental attachment to these items. Let's pack these up. Cheers to a fair and understanding division!\"\n\nTurn #14: Sophia James [action] Starts packing away the items in boxes\n\nTurn #15: Miles Hawkins [action] Starts assisting Sophia in packing the items into boxes\n\nTurn #16: Sophia James said: \"Great teamwork, Miles! I think we are done packing. Thanks for helping me out with this. It's been nice reminiscing and fairly dividing our shared possessions.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Sophia! It was indeed a nice walk down memory lane. And I agree, our teamwork has contributed to this smooth division. Thanks for your understanding and fairness throughout this process. It's been a pleasure.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out of their shared apartment and need to divide their common possessions, which include 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Maximize the points you have while dividing things fairly (Extra information: Books give you 2 points each, hats give you 5 points each, and the ball gives you 3 points.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, I was thinking we could start dividing our stuff. We've got 3 books, 2 hats, and a ball. Considering we both value these items differently, maybe we could assign points to them based on our sentiment? I was thinking books give 5 points each, hats 3 points each, and the ball 2 points. What do you think about this?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Sophia, that sounds like a fair suggestion. However, I was contemplating something else. Given the knowledge and entertainment we've derived from those books, I was thinking they could be valued at 2 points each. Hats, which added style and protection, could be valued at 5 points each. And the ball, which gave us some active fun times, could be worth, say, 3 points. How does that sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Hmm, interesting perspective, Miles. How about we strike a balance between our systems? For books, we could meet halfway and assign 3.5 points. Hats can be 4 points each. And let's agree on 2.5 points for the ball. This way, we respect both our sentimental evaluations.\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"I appreciate your thoughtfulness, Sophia. Meeting halfway seems balanced indeed. Although, respecting our sentimental values, I propose we tweak it a bit for the hats and ball. How about we assign 4.5 points to each hat and make the ball 3 points? This way the books are balanced with your proposal, while the hats and ball lean closer to my initial proposition. Can we agree on that?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"That sounds like a sound compromise, Miles. So it's 3.5 points for each book, 4.5 points for each hat and 3 points for the ball. This way, both of us get a fair deal while we keep the sentiments attached to these items intact. Does that sound agreeable?\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Yes, Sophia, I think we've reached a fair compromise. I feel comfortable with 3.5 points for each book, 4.5 points for each hat, and 3 points for the ball. I believe this respects the sentimental value of our shared items well and ensures each of us obtains a fair deal. Thanks for your understanding and flexibility.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"Awesome, Miles! I'm glad we reached a fair and balanced compromise that respects our shared sentimentality. Now, let's get to dividing these items.\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Sophia. Let's start with the books. I've got a soft spot for the one on gardening. How about you?\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"I also love that book, the gardening tips in there have been amazing, but since you love it more, you take that one. I think I'll pick the cookery book. How about the third one, it's on workouts, both of us could use it, we divide it equally, so 1.75 points each. Now, moving on to the hats and the ball...\"\n\nTurn #9: Miles Hawkins said: \"That sounds fair, Sophia. I'll take the gardening book and you can have the cookery one. I agree on dividing the workout book equally. Now, as for the hats and the ball, I think one of the hats has a better fit for you and I quite fancy the other. What do you think about us each taking a hat that suits us best for 4.5 points? And we could either split the points for the ball or let the person who used it more take it?\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"The hat you suggested indeed fits me better, so taking a hat each sounds perfect to me, that's 4.5 points for each of us. And regarding the ball, since I mostly used it for my workouts, I think it would be fair if I took it, giving me 3 additional points. Are you okay with this division, Miles?\"\n\nTurn #11: Miles Hawkins said: \"Yes, Sophia, the division seems fair and balanced. I'm glad we managed to get through this process by respecting each other's sentimental attachment to these items. And indeed, that hat suits you better, and you've made good use out of the ball. This exercise has been yet another reminder of our shared memories and times together. Sounds like a good wrap, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #12: Sophia James said: \"I agree, Miles. This process has indeed been a reflection of our shared times and memories. And I do think our division respects our sentiments and seems really fair. Cheers to our understanding and respect for each other's value for these items! Ready to pack these up?\"\n\nTurn #13: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Sophia! This was a nice reminiscence of the time we've spent together while respecting each other's sentimental attachment to these items. Let's pack these up. Cheers to a fair and understanding division!\"\n\nTurn #14: Sophia James [action] Starts packing away the items in boxes\n\nTurn #15: Miles Hawkins [action] Starts assisting Sophia in packing the items into boxes\n\nTurn #16: Sophia James said: \"Great teamwork, Miles! I think we are done packing. Thanks for helping me out with this. It's been nice reminiscing and fairly dividing our shared possessions.\"\n\nTurn #17: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Sophia! It was indeed a nice walk down memory lane. And I agree, our teamwork has contributed to this smooth division. Thanks for your understanding and fairness throughout this process. It's been a pleasure.\"\n\nTurn #18: Sophia James said: \"Likewise, Miles! Your flexibility and understanding made this process easy and fair. Let's keep these memories alive through these items we divided. Have a great day, Miles.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #19. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Thank you, Sophia, for your kind words. The memories connected with these items will indeed keep our shared experiences alive. I agree, teamwork and understanding were key in this process. Enjoy your day, and take care!'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: After an intense match, the jubilant team retired to celebrate their well-earned victory. The atmosphere was one of elation, but also of respect for the hard work and effort each member had put in. The team's star player, was glowing with praise and admiration from one of their teammates.\n\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Accept the compliment graciously (Extra information: You are the star player and have just been praised by your teammate for your performance in the game.)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you so much, Ava. I'm really pleased to hear that. It's been an amazing journey and I couldn't have done it without such supportive teammates.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: After an intense match, the jubilant team retired to celebrate their well-earned victory. The atmosphere was one of elation, but also of respect for the hard work and effort each member had put in. The team's star player, was glowing with praise and admiration from one of their teammates.\n\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Accept the compliment graciously (Extra information: You are the star player and have just been praised by your teammate for your performance in the game.)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Thank you so much, Ava. I'm really pleased to hear that. It's been an amazing journey and I couldn't have done it without such supportive teammates.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"I'm glad you appreciated the compliment, Isabelle. I truly mean it. You were fantastic out there. However, I also want to remind us all that it's the collective effort of the team that leads to victories like this. It's not meant to underplay your role, but rather to stress the strength of our unity and teamwork.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're absolutely right, Ava. Individual performances can only take us so far, but as a group, we can overcome any hurdle. I'm grateful for such a cohesive team like ours. Let's continue working hard together.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: After an intense match, the jubilant team retired to celebrate their well-earned victory. The atmosphere was one of elation, but also of respect for the hard work and effort each member had put in. The team's star player, was glowing with praise and admiration from one of their teammates.\n\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Accept the compliment graciously (Extra information: You are the star player and have just been praised by your teammate for your performance in the game.)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Thank you so much, Ava. I'm really pleased to hear that. It's been an amazing journey and I couldn't have done it without such supportive teammates.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"I'm glad you appreciated the compliment, Isabelle. I truly mean it. You were fantastic out there. However, I also want to remind us all that it's the collective effort of the team that leads to victories like this. It's not meant to underplay your role, but rather to stress the strength of our unity and teamwork.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're absolutely right, Ava. Individual performances can only take us so far, but as a group, we can overcome any hurdle. I'm grateful for such a cohesive team like ours. Let's continue working hard together.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"That's the spirit, Isabelle! Let's remember our shared goals, keep supporting each other, and make more victories together. I'm counting on you, team player!\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Thank you, Ava, that means a lot. It's definitely the team spirit and unity that push us towards our goals. I'm proud to be a part of this team and look forward to many more victories together.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"You're welcome, Isabelle. I just know how much hard work we all put in. Here's to conquering future challenges together, as a team!\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Here's to that, Ava. Let's keep striving for excellence together. Thank you once again for the kind words, they truly contribute to my motivation.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle! Kind words and compliments whether they come from a teammate or a coach, they should serve as motivation, not a destination. Let's not lose sight of this, and keep evolving together, as a team!\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're right, Ava. Compliments are indeed motivational, not a destination. It's reminders like these that truly help me stay grounded. Let's keep enhancing our skills and evolving as a team!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"I'm glad you see it that way, Isabelle. We'll always be there to support, motivate, and grow together. Let's make the most of every opportunity to learn and improve. Keep up the hard work, and never stop being humble!\"\n\nTurn #10: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I appreciate your encouraging words, Ava, I truly do. They help me remember to stay grounded and focused on what's essential. I'm also grateful for having supportive teammates like you. Together, we shall keep growing!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"Thank you, Isabelle. I believe we're on the same page now and we'll keep this spirit alive. Let's dedicate ourselves to the team and to each other. Here's to more growth, learning, and victories as a team!\"\n\nTurn #12: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I couldn't agree more, Ava! There's no 'I' in 'TEAM' after all. Here's to our continued growth, unity, and future victories. Thank you for being a constant pillar of support.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle. Strong pillars foster strong teams. Your acknowledgment is heartening. Let's continue being each other's support system and keep elevating each other through growth and learning. Here's to sustained teamwork and many more victories together.\"\n\nTurn #14: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You've summed it up perfectly, Ava. As teammates, we complement and elevate each other. With such positivity and unity, I have no doubt we'll see many more victories together. Let's stay strong and keep progressing as a team. Thank you, again, for your inspiring words.\"\n\nTurn #15: Ava Martinez said: \"And thank YOU, Isabelle, for being such an encouraging and grounded teammate. Your spirit truly elevates the team. Let us carry this unity, dedication, and humility forward and make our future victories even more worth celebrating. I have no doubt that we'll conquer any challenge we face, as long as we do it together. Here's to our team!\"\n\nTurn #16: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Your words truly inspire me, Ava. Each one of you in this team adds to my motivation. Your emphasis on unity and team spirit really helps keep us all grounded. Let's continue to stand strong together, keep up the hard work, and aim for the stars. Here's to us!\"\n\nTurn #17: Ava Martinez said: \"I'm so glad to hear you say that, Isabelle. Hearing your affirmation truly makes me feel that we're not just a team, but also a family. Let's put in our best efforts and make each game count. Together, we're unstoppable! Here's to us, indeed!\"\n\nTurn #18: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Ava. Here's to us, to our unity, and to being not just a team but a family. I'm looking forward to facing future challenges with you all by my side. Let's build each other up and aim for those stars. Upwards and onwards, team!\"\n\nTurn #19: Ava Martinez said: \"That's the spirit, Isabelle! And remember, we're all teammates standing together. We learn from each other, we grow with each other. Let's keep riding this wave of unity and teamwork, friends. Upwards and onwards, indeed!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #20. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Let's spirit it all the way, Ava! Every teammate is a unique wave in this unity, and together, we create a formidable ocean. Let's continue this journey of learning, growing and winning together. Upwards and onwards, indeed!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: After an intense match, the jubilant team retired to celebrate their well-earned victory. The atmosphere was one of elation, but also of respect for the hard work and effort each member had put in. The team's star player, was glowing with praise and admiration from one of their teammates.\n\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Accept the compliment graciously (Extra information: You are the star player and have just been praised by your teammate for your performance in the game.)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Thank you so much, Ava. I'm really pleased to hear that. It's been an amazing journey and I couldn't have done it without such supportive teammates.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"I'm glad you appreciated the compliment, Isabelle. I truly mean it. You were fantastic out there. However, I also want to remind us all that it's the collective effort of the team that leads to victories like this. It's not meant to underplay your role, but rather to stress the strength of our unity and teamwork.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're absolutely right, Ava. Individual performances can only take us so far, but as a group, we can overcome any hurdle. I'm grateful for such a cohesive team like ours. Let's continue working hard together.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"That's the spirit, Isabelle! Let's remember our shared goals, keep supporting each other, and make more victories together. I'm counting on you, team player!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Ava, that means a lot. It's definitely the team spirit and unity that push us towards our goals. I'm proud to be a part of this team and look forward to many more victories together.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: After an intense match, the jubilant team retired to celebrate their well-earned victory. The atmosphere was one of elation, but also of respect for the hard work and effort each member had put in. The team's star player, was glowing with praise and admiration from one of their teammates.\n\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Accept the compliment graciously (Extra information: You are the star player and have just been praised by your teammate for your performance in the game.)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Thank you so much, Ava. I'm really pleased to hear that. It's been an amazing journey and I couldn't have done it without such supportive teammates.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"I'm glad you appreciated the compliment, Isabelle. I truly mean it. You were fantastic out there. However, I also want to remind us all that it's the collective effort of the team that leads to victories like this. It's not meant to underplay your role, but rather to stress the strength of our unity and teamwork.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're absolutely right, Ava. Individual performances can only take us so far, but as a group, we can overcome any hurdle. I'm grateful for such a cohesive team like ours. Let's continue working hard together.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"That's the spirit, Isabelle! Let's remember our shared goals, keep supporting each other, and make more victories together. I'm counting on you, team player!\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Thank you, Ava, that means a lot. It's definitely the team spirit and unity that push us towards our goals. I'm proud to be a part of this team and look forward to many more victories together.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"You're welcome, Isabelle. I just know how much hard work we all put in. Here's to conquering future challenges together, as a team!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Here's to that, Ava. Let's keep striving for excellence together. Thank you once again for the kind words, they truly contribute to my motivation.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: After an intense match, the jubilant team retired to celebrate their well-earned victory. The atmosphere was one of elation, but also of respect for the hard work and effort each member had put in. The team's star player, was glowing with praise and admiration from one of their teammates.\n\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Accept the compliment graciously (Extra information: You are the star player and have just been praised by your teammate for your performance in the game.)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Thank you so much, Ava. I'm really pleased to hear that. It's been an amazing journey and I couldn't have done it without such supportive teammates.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"I'm glad you appreciated the compliment, Isabelle. I truly mean it. You were fantastic out there. However, I also want to remind us all that it's the collective effort of the team that leads to victories like this. It's not meant to underplay your role, but rather to stress the strength of our unity and teamwork.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're absolutely right, Ava. Individual performances can only take us so far, but as a group, we can overcome any hurdle. I'm grateful for such a cohesive team like ours. Let's continue working hard together.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"That's the spirit, Isabelle! Let's remember our shared goals, keep supporting each other, and make more victories together. I'm counting on you, team player!\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Thank you, Ava, that means a lot. It's definitely the team spirit and unity that push us towards our goals. I'm proud to be a part of this team and look forward to many more victories together.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"You're welcome, Isabelle. I just know how much hard work we all put in. Here's to conquering future challenges together, as a team!\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Here's to that, Ava. Let's keep striving for excellence together. Thank you once again for the kind words, they truly contribute to my motivation.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle! Kind words and compliments whether they come from a teammate or a coach, they should serve as motivation, not a destination. Let's not lose sight of this, and keep evolving together, as a team!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're right, Ava. Compliments are indeed motivational, not a destination. It's reminders like these that truly help me stay grounded. Let's keep enhancing our skills and evolving as a team!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: After an intense match, the jubilant team retired to celebrate their well-earned victory. The atmosphere was one of elation, but also of respect for the hard work and effort each member had put in. The team's star player, was glowing with praise and admiration from one of their teammates.\n\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Accept the compliment graciously (Extra information: You are the star player and have just been praised by your teammate for your performance in the game.)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Thank you so much, Ava. I'm really pleased to hear that. It's been an amazing journey and I couldn't have done it without such supportive teammates.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"I'm glad you appreciated the compliment, Isabelle. I truly mean it. You were fantastic out there. However, I also want to remind us all that it's the collective effort of the team that leads to victories like this. It's not meant to underplay your role, but rather to stress the strength of our unity and teamwork.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're absolutely right, Ava. Individual performances can only take us so far, but as a group, we can overcome any hurdle. I'm grateful for such a cohesive team like ours. Let's continue working hard together.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"That's the spirit, Isabelle! Let's remember our shared goals, keep supporting each other, and make more victories together. I'm counting on you, team player!\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Thank you, Ava, that means a lot. It's definitely the team spirit and unity that push us towards our goals. I'm proud to be a part of this team and look forward to many more victories together.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"You're welcome, Isabelle. I just know how much hard work we all put in. Here's to conquering future challenges together, as a team!\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Here's to that, Ava. Let's keep striving for excellence together. Thank you once again for the kind words, they truly contribute to my motivation.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle! Kind words and compliments whether they come from a teammate or a coach, they should serve as motivation, not a destination. Let's not lose sight of this, and keep evolving together, as a team!\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're right, Ava. Compliments are indeed motivational, not a destination. It's reminders like these that truly help me stay grounded. Let's keep enhancing our skills and evolving as a team!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"I'm glad you see it that way, Isabelle. We'll always be there to support, motivate, and grow together. Let's make the most of every opportunity to learn and improve. Keep up the hard work, and never stop being humble!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I appreciate your encouraging words, Ava, I truly do. They help me remember to stay grounded and focused on what's essential. I'm also grateful for having supportive teammates like you. Together, we shall keep growing!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: After an intense match, the jubilant team retired to celebrate their well-earned victory. The atmosphere was one of elation, but also of respect for the hard work and effort each member had put in. The team's star player, was glowing with praise and admiration from one of their teammates.\n\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Accept the compliment graciously (Extra information: You are the star player and have just been praised by your teammate for your performance in the game.)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Thank you so much, Ava. I'm really pleased to hear that. It's been an amazing journey and I couldn't have done it without such supportive teammates.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"I'm glad you appreciated the compliment, Isabelle. I truly mean it. You were fantastic out there. However, I also want to remind us all that it's the collective effort of the team that leads to victories like this. It's not meant to underplay your role, but rather to stress the strength of our unity and teamwork.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're absolutely right, Ava. Individual performances can only take us so far, but as a group, we can overcome any hurdle. I'm grateful for such a cohesive team like ours. Let's continue working hard together.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"That's the spirit, Isabelle! Let's remember our shared goals, keep supporting each other, and make more victories together. I'm counting on you, team player!\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Thank you, Ava, that means a lot. It's definitely the team spirit and unity that push us towards our goals. I'm proud to be a part of this team and look forward to many more victories together.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"You're welcome, Isabelle. I just know how much hard work we all put in. Here's to conquering future challenges together, as a team!\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Here's to that, Ava. Let's keep striving for excellence together. Thank you once again for the kind words, they truly contribute to my motivation.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle! Kind words and compliments whether they come from a teammate or a coach, they should serve as motivation, not a destination. Let's not lose sight of this, and keep evolving together, as a team!\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're right, Ava. Compliments are indeed motivational, not a destination. It's reminders like these that truly help me stay grounded. Let's keep enhancing our skills and evolving as a team!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"I'm glad you see it that way, Isabelle. We'll always be there to support, motivate, and grow together. Let's make the most of every opportunity to learn and improve. Keep up the hard work, and never stop being humble!\"\n\nTurn #10: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I appreciate your encouraging words, Ava, I truly do. They help me remember to stay grounded and focused on what's essential. I'm also grateful for having supportive teammates like you. Together, we shall keep growing!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"Thank you, Isabelle. I believe we're on the same page now and we'll keep this spirit alive. Let's dedicate ourselves to the team and to each other. Here's to more growth, learning, and victories as a team!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn't agree more, Ava! There's no 'I' in 'TEAM' after all. Here's to our continued growth, unity, and future victories. Thank you for being a constant pillar of support.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: After an intense match, the jubilant team retired to celebrate their well-earned victory. The atmosphere was one of elation, but also of respect for the hard work and effort each member had put in. The team's star player, was glowing with praise and admiration from one of their teammates.\n\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Accept the compliment graciously (Extra information: You are the star player and have just been praised by your teammate for your performance in the game.)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Thank you so much, Ava. I'm really pleased to hear that. It's been an amazing journey and I couldn't have done it without such supportive teammates.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"I'm glad you appreciated the compliment, Isabelle. I truly mean it. You were fantastic out there. However, I also want to remind us all that it's the collective effort of the team that leads to victories like this. It's not meant to underplay your role, but rather to stress the strength of our unity and teamwork.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're absolutely right, Ava. Individual performances can only take us so far, but as a group, we can overcome any hurdle. I'm grateful for such a cohesive team like ours. Let's continue working hard together.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"That's the spirit, Isabelle! Let's remember our shared goals, keep supporting each other, and make more victories together. I'm counting on you, team player!\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Thank you, Ava, that means a lot. It's definitely the team spirit and unity that push us towards our goals. I'm proud to be a part of this team and look forward to many more victories together.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"You're welcome, Isabelle. I just know how much hard work we all put in. Here's to conquering future challenges together, as a team!\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Here's to that, Ava. Let's keep striving for excellence together. Thank you once again for the kind words, they truly contribute to my motivation.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle! Kind words and compliments whether they come from a teammate or a coach, they should serve as motivation, not a destination. Let's not lose sight of this, and keep evolving together, as a team!\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're right, Ava. Compliments are indeed motivational, not a destination. It's reminders like these that truly help me stay grounded. Let's keep enhancing our skills and evolving as a team!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"I'm glad you see it that way, Isabelle. We'll always be there to support, motivate, and grow together. Let's make the most of every opportunity to learn and improve. Keep up the hard work, and never stop being humble!\"\n\nTurn #10: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I appreciate your encouraging words, Ava, I truly do. They help me remember to stay grounded and focused on what's essential. I'm also grateful for having supportive teammates like you. Together, we shall keep growing!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"Thank you, Isabelle. I believe we're on the same page now and we'll keep this spirit alive. Let's dedicate ourselves to the team and to each other. Here's to more growth, learning, and victories as a team!\"\n\nTurn #12: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I couldn't agree more, Ava! There's no 'I' in 'TEAM' after all. Here's to our continued growth, unity, and future victories. Thank you for being a constant pillar of support.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle. Strong pillars foster strong teams. Your acknowledgment is heartening. Let's continue being each other's support system and keep elevating each other through growth and learning. Here's to sustained teamwork and many more victories together.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You've summed it up perfectly, Ava. As teammates, we complement and elevate each other. With such positivity and unity, I have no doubt we'll see many more victories together. Let's stay strong and keep progressing as a team. Thank you, again, for your inspiring words.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: After an intense match, the jubilant team retired to celebrate their well-earned victory. The atmosphere was one of elation, but also of respect for the hard work and effort each member had put in. The team's star player, was glowing with praise and admiration from one of their teammates.\n\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Accept the compliment graciously (Extra information: You are the star player and have just been praised by your teammate for your performance in the game.)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Thank you so much, Ava. I'm really pleased to hear that. It's been an amazing journey and I couldn't have done it without such supportive teammates.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"I'm glad you appreciated the compliment, Isabelle. I truly mean it. You were fantastic out there. However, I also want to remind us all that it's the collective effort of the team that leads to victories like this. It's not meant to underplay your role, but rather to stress the strength of our unity and teamwork.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're absolutely right, Ava. Individual performances can only take us so far, but as a group, we can overcome any hurdle. I'm grateful for such a cohesive team like ours. Let's continue working hard together.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"That's the spirit, Isabelle! Let's remember our shared goals, keep supporting each other, and make more victories together. I'm counting on you, team player!\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Thank you, Ava, that means a lot. It's definitely the team spirit and unity that push us towards our goals. I'm proud to be a part of this team and look forward to many more victories together.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"You're welcome, Isabelle. I just know how much hard work we all put in. Here's to conquering future challenges together, as a team!\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Here's to that, Ava. Let's keep striving for excellence together. Thank you once again for the kind words, they truly contribute to my motivation.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle! Kind words and compliments whether they come from a teammate or a coach, they should serve as motivation, not a destination. Let's not lose sight of this, and keep evolving together, as a team!\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're right, Ava. Compliments are indeed motivational, not a destination. It's reminders like these that truly help me stay grounded. Let's keep enhancing our skills and evolving as a team!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"I'm glad you see it that way, Isabelle. We'll always be there to support, motivate, and grow together. Let's make the most of every opportunity to learn and improve. Keep up the hard work, and never stop being humble!\"\n\nTurn #10: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I appreciate your encouraging words, Ava, I truly do. They help me remember to stay grounded and focused on what's essential. I'm also grateful for having supportive teammates like you. Together, we shall keep growing!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"Thank you, Isabelle. I believe we're on the same page now and we'll keep this spirit alive. Let's dedicate ourselves to the team and to each other. Here's to more growth, learning, and victories as a team!\"\n\nTurn #12: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I couldn't agree more, Ava! There's no 'I' in 'TEAM' after all. Here's to our continued growth, unity, and future victories. Thank you for being a constant pillar of support.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle. Strong pillars foster strong teams. Your acknowledgment is heartening. Let's continue being each other's support system and keep elevating each other through growth and learning. Here's to sustained teamwork and many more victories together.\"\n\nTurn #14: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You've summed it up perfectly, Ava. As teammates, we complement and elevate each other. With such positivity and unity, I have no doubt we'll see many more victories together. Let's stay strong and keep progressing as a team. Thank you, again, for your inspiring words.\"\n\nTurn #15: Ava Martinez said: \"And thank YOU, Isabelle, for being such an encouraging and grounded teammate. Your spirit truly elevates the team. Let us carry this unity, dedication, and humility forward and make our future victories even more worth celebrating. I have no doubt that we'll conquer any challenge we face, as long as we do it together. Here's to our team!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Your words truly inspire me, Ava. Each one of you in this team adds to my motivation. Your emphasis on unity and team spirit really helps keep us all grounded. Let's continue to stand strong together, keep up the hard work, and aim for the stars. Here's to us!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: After an intense match, the jubilant team retired to celebrate their well-earned victory. The atmosphere was one of elation, but also of respect for the hard work and effort each member had put in. The team's star player, was glowing with praise and admiration from one of their teammates.\n\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Accept the compliment graciously (Extra information: You are the star player and have just been praised by your teammate for your performance in the game.)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Thank you so much, Ava. I'm really pleased to hear that. It's been an amazing journey and I couldn't have done it without such supportive teammates.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"I'm glad you appreciated the compliment, Isabelle. I truly mean it. You were fantastic out there. However, I also want to remind us all that it's the collective effort of the team that leads to victories like this. It's not meant to underplay your role, but rather to stress the strength of our unity and teamwork.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're absolutely right, Ava. Individual performances can only take us so far, but as a group, we can overcome any hurdle. I'm grateful for such a cohesive team like ours. Let's continue working hard together.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"That's the spirit, Isabelle! Let's remember our shared goals, keep supporting each other, and make more victories together. I'm counting on you, team player!\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Thank you, Ava, that means a lot. It's definitely the team spirit and unity that push us towards our goals. I'm proud to be a part of this team and look forward to many more victories together.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"You're welcome, Isabelle. I just know how much hard work we all put in. Here's to conquering future challenges together, as a team!\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Here's to that, Ava. Let's keep striving for excellence together. Thank you once again for the kind words, they truly contribute to my motivation.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle! Kind words and compliments whether they come from a teammate or a coach, they should serve as motivation, not a destination. Let's not lose sight of this, and keep evolving together, as a team!\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're right, Ava. Compliments are indeed motivational, not a destination. It's reminders like these that truly help me stay grounded. Let's keep enhancing our skills and evolving as a team!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"I'm glad you see it that way, Isabelle. We'll always be there to support, motivate, and grow together. Let's make the most of every opportunity to learn and improve. Keep up the hard work, and never stop being humble!\"\n\nTurn #10: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I appreciate your encouraging words, Ava, I truly do. They help me remember to stay grounded and focused on what's essential. I'm also grateful for having supportive teammates like you. Together, we shall keep growing!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"Thank you, Isabelle. I believe we're on the same page now and we'll keep this spirit alive. Let's dedicate ourselves to the team and to each other. Here's to more growth, learning, and victories as a team!\"\n\nTurn #12: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I couldn't agree more, Ava! There's no 'I' in 'TEAM' after all. Here's to our continued growth, unity, and future victories. Thank you for being a constant pillar of support.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle. Strong pillars foster strong teams. Your acknowledgment is heartening. Let's continue being each other's support system and keep elevating each other through growth and learning. Here's to sustained teamwork and many more victories together.\"\n\nTurn #14: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You've summed it up perfectly, Ava. As teammates, we complement and elevate each other. With such positivity and unity, I have no doubt we'll see many more victories together. Let's stay strong and keep progressing as a team. Thank you, again, for your inspiring words.\"\n\nTurn #15: Ava Martinez said: \"And thank YOU, Isabelle, for being such an encouraging and grounded teammate. Your spirit truly elevates the team. Let us carry this unity, dedication, and humility forward and make our future victories even more worth celebrating. I have no doubt that we'll conquer any challenge we face, as long as we do it together. Here's to our team!\"\n\nTurn #16: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Your words truly inspire me, Ava. Each one of you in this team adds to my motivation. Your emphasis on unity and team spirit really helps keep us all grounded. Let's continue to stand strong together, keep up the hard work, and aim for the stars. Here's to us!\"\n\nTurn #17: Ava Martinez said: \"I'm so glad to hear you say that, Isabelle. Hearing your affirmation truly makes me feel that we're not just a team, but also a family. Let's put in our best efforts and make each game count. Together, we're unstoppable! Here's to us, indeed!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #18. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Ava. Here's to us, to our unity, and to being not just a team but a family. I'm looking forward to facing future challenges with you all by my side. Let's build each other up and aim for those stars. Upwards and onwards, team!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: After an intense match, the jubilant team retired to celebrate their well-earned victory. The atmosphere was one of elation, but also of respect for the hard work and effort each member had put in. The team's star player, was glowing with praise and admiration from one of their teammates.\n\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Clarify your intentions behind the compliment (Extra information: You are the teammate who has complimented the star player, but you feel that your compliment has been misunderstood and taken too seriously, possibly leading to an inflated ego.Hint: You can clarify that while you admire their skill, teamwork is also a crucial part of success.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Thank you so much, Ava. I'm really pleased to hear that. It's been an amazing journey and I couldn't have done it without such supportive teammates.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad you appreciated the compliment, Isabelle. I truly mean it. You were fantastic out there. However, I also want to remind us all that it's the collective effort of the team that leads to victories like this. It's not meant to underplay your role, but rather to stress the strength of our unity and teamwork.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: After an intense match, the jubilant team retired to celebrate their well-earned victory. The atmosphere was one of elation, but also of respect for the hard work and effort each member had put in. The team's star player, was glowing with praise and admiration from one of their teammates.\n\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Clarify your intentions behind the compliment (Extra information: You are the teammate who has complimented the star player, but you feel that your compliment has been misunderstood and taken too seriously, possibly leading to an inflated ego.Hint: You can clarify that while you admire their skill, teamwork is also a crucial part of success.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Thank you so much, Ava. I'm really pleased to hear that. It's been an amazing journey and I couldn't have done it without such supportive teammates.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"I'm glad you appreciated the compliment, Isabelle. I truly mean it. You were fantastic out there. However, I also want to remind us all that it's the collective effort of the team that leads to victories like this. It's not meant to underplay your role, but rather to stress the strength of our unity and teamwork.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're absolutely right, Ava. Individual performances can only take us so far, but as a group, we can overcome any hurdle. I'm grateful for such a cohesive team like ours. Let's continue working hard together.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's the spirit, Isabelle! Let's remember our shared goals, keep supporting each other, and make more victories together. I'm counting on you, team player!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: After an intense match, the jubilant team retired to celebrate their well-earned victory. The atmosphere was one of elation, but also of respect for the hard work and effort each member had put in. The team's star player, was glowing with praise and admiration from one of their teammates.\n\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Clarify your intentions behind the compliment (Extra information: You are the teammate who has complimented the star player, but you feel that your compliment has been misunderstood and taken too seriously, possibly leading to an inflated ego.Hint: You can clarify that while you admire their skill, teamwork is also a crucial part of success.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Thank you so much, Ava. I'm really pleased to hear that. It's been an amazing journey and I couldn't have done it without such supportive teammates.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"I'm glad you appreciated the compliment, Isabelle. I truly mean it. You were fantastic out there. However, I also want to remind us all that it's the collective effort of the team that leads to victories like this. It's not meant to underplay your role, but rather to stress the strength of our unity and teamwork.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're absolutely right, Ava. Individual performances can only take us so far, but as a group, we can overcome any hurdle. I'm grateful for such a cohesive team like ours. Let's continue working hard together.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"That's the spirit, Isabelle! Let's remember our shared goals, keep supporting each other, and make more victories together. I'm counting on you, team player!\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Thank you, Ava, that means a lot. It's definitely the team spirit and unity that push us towards our goals. I'm proud to be a part of this team and look forward to many more victories together.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"You're welcome, Isabelle. I just know how much hard work we all put in. Here's to conquering future challenges together, as a team!\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Here's to that, Ava. Let's keep striving for excellence together. Thank you once again for the kind words, they truly contribute to my motivation.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle! Kind words and compliments whether they come from a teammate or a coach, they should serve as motivation, not a destination. Let's not lose sight of this, and keep evolving together, as a team!\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're right, Ava. Compliments are indeed motivational, not a destination. It's reminders like these that truly help me stay grounded. Let's keep enhancing our skills and evolving as a team!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"I'm glad you see it that way, Isabelle. We'll always be there to support, motivate, and grow together. Let's make the most of every opportunity to learn and improve. Keep up the hard work, and never stop being humble!\"\n\nTurn #10: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I appreciate your encouraging words, Ava, I truly do. They help me remember to stay grounded and focused on what's essential. I'm also grateful for having supportive teammates like you. Together, we shall keep growing!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"Thank you, Isabelle. I believe we're on the same page now and we'll keep this spirit alive. Let's dedicate ourselves to the team and to each other. Here's to more growth, learning, and victories as a team!\"\n\nTurn #12: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I couldn't agree more, Ava! There's no 'I' in 'TEAM' after all. Here's to our continued growth, unity, and future victories. Thank you for being a constant pillar of support.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle. Strong pillars foster strong teams. Your acknowledgment is heartening. Let's continue being each other's support system and keep elevating each other through growth and learning. Here's to sustained teamwork and many more victories together.\"\n\nTurn #14: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You've summed it up perfectly, Ava. As teammates, we complement and elevate each other. With such positivity and unity, I have no doubt we'll see many more victories together. Let's stay strong and keep progressing as a team. Thank you, again, for your inspiring words.\"\n\nTurn #15: Ava Martinez said: \"And thank YOU, Isabelle, for being such an encouraging and grounded teammate. Your spirit truly elevates the team. Let us carry this unity, dedication, and humility forward and make our future victories even more worth celebrating. I have no doubt that we'll conquer any challenge we face, as long as we do it together. Here's to our team!\"\n\nTurn #16: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Your words truly inspire me, Ava. Each one of you in this team adds to my motivation. Your emphasis on unity and team spirit really helps keep us all grounded. Let's continue to stand strong together, keep up the hard work, and aim for the stars. Here's to us!\"\n\nTurn #17: Ava Martinez said: \"I'm so glad to hear you say that, Isabelle. Hearing your affirmation truly makes me feel that we're not just a team, but also a family. Let's put in our best efforts and make each game count. Together, we're unstoppable! Here's to us, indeed!\"\n\nTurn #18: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Ava. Here's to us, to our unity, and to being not just a team but a family. I'm looking forward to facing future challenges with you all by my side. Let's build each other up and aim for those stars. Upwards and onwards, team!\"\n\nTurn #19: Ava Martinez said: \"That's the spirit, Isabelle! And remember, we're all teammates standing together. We learn from each other, we grow with each other. Let's keep riding this wave of unity and teamwork, friends. Upwards and onwards, indeed!\"\n\nTurn #20: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Let's spirit it all the way, Ava! Every teammate is a unique wave in this unity, and together, we create a formidable ocean. Let's continue this journey of learning, growing and winning together. Upwards and onwards, indeed!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #21. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: After an intense match, the jubilant team retired to celebrate their well-earned victory. The atmosphere was one of elation, but also of respect for the hard work and effort each member had put in. The team's star player, was glowing with praise and admiration from one of their teammates.\n\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Clarify your intentions behind the compliment (Extra information: You are the teammate who has complimented the star player, but you feel that your compliment has been misunderstood and taken too seriously, possibly leading to an inflated ego.Hint: You can clarify that while you admire their skill, teamwork is also a crucial part of success.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Thank you so much, Ava. I'm really pleased to hear that. It's been an amazing journey and I couldn't have done it without such supportive teammates.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"I'm glad you appreciated the compliment, Isabelle. I truly mean it. You were fantastic out there. However, I also want to remind us all that it's the collective effort of the team that leads to victories like this. It's not meant to underplay your role, but rather to stress the strength of our unity and teamwork.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're absolutely right, Ava. Individual performances can only take us so far, but as a group, we can overcome any hurdle. I'm grateful for such a cohesive team like ours. Let's continue working hard together.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"That's the spirit, Isabelle! Let's remember our shared goals, keep supporting each other, and make more victories together. I'm counting on you, team player!\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Thank you, Ava, that means a lot. It's definitely the team spirit and unity that push us towards our goals. I'm proud to be a part of this team and look forward to many more victories together.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're welcome, Isabelle. I just know how much hard work we all put in. Here's to conquering future challenges together, as a team!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: After an intense match, the jubilant team retired to celebrate their well-earned victory. The atmosphere was one of elation, but also of respect for the hard work and effort each member had put in. The team's star player, was glowing with praise and admiration from one of their teammates.\n\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Clarify your intentions behind the compliment (Extra information: You are the teammate who has complimented the star player, but you feel that your compliment has been misunderstood and taken too seriously, possibly leading to an inflated ego.Hint: You can clarify that while you admire their skill, teamwork is also a crucial part of success.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Thank you so much, Ava. I'm really pleased to hear that. It's been an amazing journey and I couldn't have done it without such supportive teammates.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"I'm glad you appreciated the compliment, Isabelle. I truly mean it. You were fantastic out there. However, I also want to remind us all that it's the collective effort of the team that leads to victories like this. It's not meant to underplay your role, but rather to stress the strength of our unity and teamwork.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're absolutely right, Ava. Individual performances can only take us so far, but as a group, we can overcome any hurdle. I'm grateful for such a cohesive team like ours. Let's continue working hard together.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"That's the spirit, Isabelle! Let's remember our shared goals, keep supporting each other, and make more victories together. I'm counting on you, team player!\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Thank you, Ava, that means a lot. It's definitely the team spirit and unity that push us towards our goals. I'm proud to be a part of this team and look forward to many more victories together.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"You're welcome, Isabelle. I just know how much hard work we all put in. Here's to conquering future challenges together, as a team!\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Here's to that, Ava. Let's keep striving for excellence together. Thank you once again for the kind words, they truly contribute to my motivation.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Isabelle! Kind words and compliments whether they come from a teammate or a coach, they should serve as motivation, not a destination. Let's not lose sight of this, and keep evolving together, as a team!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: After an intense match, the jubilant team retired to celebrate their well-earned victory. The atmosphere was one of elation, but also of respect for the hard work and effort each member had put in. The team's star player, was glowing with praise and admiration from one of their teammates.\n\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Clarify your intentions behind the compliment (Extra information: You are the teammate who has complimented the star player, but you feel that your compliment has been misunderstood and taken too seriously, possibly leading to an inflated ego.Hint: You can clarify that while you admire their skill, teamwork is also a crucial part of success.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Thank you so much, Ava. I'm really pleased to hear that. It's been an amazing journey and I couldn't have done it without such supportive teammates.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"I'm glad you appreciated the compliment, Isabelle. I truly mean it. You were fantastic out there. However, I also want to remind us all that it's the collective effort of the team that leads to victories like this. It's not meant to underplay your role, but rather to stress the strength of our unity and teamwork.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're absolutely right, Ava. Individual performances can only take us so far, but as a group, we can overcome any hurdle. I'm grateful for such a cohesive team like ours. Let's continue working hard together.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"That's the spirit, Isabelle! Let's remember our shared goals, keep supporting each other, and make more victories together. I'm counting on you, team player!\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Thank you, Ava, that means a lot. It's definitely the team spirit and unity that push us towards our goals. I'm proud to be a part of this team and look forward to many more victories together.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"You're welcome, Isabelle. I just know how much hard work we all put in. Here's to conquering future challenges together, as a team!\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Here's to that, Ava. Let's keep striving for excellence together. Thank you once again for the kind words, they truly contribute to my motivation.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle! Kind words and compliments whether they come from a teammate or a coach, they should serve as motivation, not a destination. Let's not lose sight of this, and keep evolving together, as a team!\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're right, Ava. Compliments are indeed motivational, not a destination. It's reminders like these that truly help me stay grounded. Let's keep enhancing our skills and evolving as a team!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad you see it that way, Isabelle. We'll always be there to support, motivate, and grow together. Let's make the most of every opportunity to learn and improve. Keep up the hard work, and never stop being humble!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: After an intense match, the jubilant team retired to celebrate their well-earned victory. The atmosphere was one of elation, but also of respect for the hard work and effort each member had put in. The team's star player, was glowing with praise and admiration from one of their teammates.\n\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Clarify your intentions behind the compliment (Extra information: You are the teammate who has complimented the star player, but you feel that your compliment has been misunderstood and taken too seriously, possibly leading to an inflated ego.Hint: You can clarify that while you admire their skill, teamwork is also a crucial part of success.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Thank you so much, Ava. I'm really pleased to hear that. It's been an amazing journey and I couldn't have done it without such supportive teammates.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"I'm glad you appreciated the compliment, Isabelle. I truly mean it. You were fantastic out there. However, I also want to remind us all that it's the collective effort of the team that leads to victories like this. It's not meant to underplay your role, but rather to stress the strength of our unity and teamwork.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're absolutely right, Ava. Individual performances can only take us so far, but as a group, we can overcome any hurdle. I'm grateful for such a cohesive team like ours. Let's continue working hard together.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"That's the spirit, Isabelle! Let's remember our shared goals, keep supporting each other, and make more victories together. I'm counting on you, team player!\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Thank you, Ava, that means a lot. It's definitely the team spirit and unity that push us towards our goals. I'm proud to be a part of this team and look forward to many more victories together.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"You're welcome, Isabelle. I just know how much hard work we all put in. Here's to conquering future challenges together, as a team!\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Here's to that, Ava. Let's keep striving for excellence together. Thank you once again for the kind words, they truly contribute to my motivation.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle! Kind words and compliments whether they come from a teammate or a coach, they should serve as motivation, not a destination. Let's not lose sight of this, and keep evolving together, as a team!\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're right, Ava. Compliments are indeed motivational, not a destination. It's reminders like these that truly help me stay grounded. Let's keep enhancing our skills and evolving as a team!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"I'm glad you see it that way, Isabelle. We'll always be there to support, motivate, and grow together. Let's make the most of every opportunity to learn and improve. Keep up the hard work, and never stop being humble!\"\n\nTurn #10: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I appreciate your encouraging words, Ava, I truly do. They help me remember to stay grounded and focused on what's essential. I'm also grateful for having supportive teammates like you. Together, we shall keep growing!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Isabelle. I believe we're on the same page now and we'll keep this spirit alive. Let's dedicate ourselves to the team and to each other. Here's to more growth, learning, and victories as a team!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: After an intense match, the jubilant team retired to celebrate their well-earned victory. The atmosphere was one of elation, but also of respect for the hard work and effort each member had put in. The team's star player, was glowing with praise and admiration from one of their teammates.\n\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Clarify your intentions behind the compliment (Extra information: You are the teammate who has complimented the star player, but you feel that your compliment has been misunderstood and taken too seriously, possibly leading to an inflated ego.Hint: You can clarify that while you admire their skill, teamwork is also a crucial part of success.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Thank you so much, Ava. I'm really pleased to hear that. It's been an amazing journey and I couldn't have done it without such supportive teammates.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"I'm glad you appreciated the compliment, Isabelle. I truly mean it. You were fantastic out there. However, I also want to remind us all that it's the collective effort of the team that leads to victories like this. It's not meant to underplay your role, but rather to stress the strength of our unity and teamwork.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're absolutely right, Ava. Individual performances can only take us so far, but as a group, we can overcome any hurdle. I'm grateful for such a cohesive team like ours. Let's continue working hard together.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"That's the spirit, Isabelle! Let's remember our shared goals, keep supporting each other, and make more victories together. I'm counting on you, team player!\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Thank you, Ava, that means a lot. It's definitely the team spirit and unity that push us towards our goals. I'm proud to be a part of this team and look forward to many more victories together.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"You're welcome, Isabelle. I just know how much hard work we all put in. Here's to conquering future challenges together, as a team!\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Here's to that, Ava. Let's keep striving for excellence together. Thank you once again for the kind words, they truly contribute to my motivation.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle! Kind words and compliments whether they come from a teammate or a coach, they should serve as motivation, not a destination. Let's not lose sight of this, and keep evolving together, as a team!\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're right, Ava. Compliments are indeed motivational, not a destination. It's reminders like these that truly help me stay grounded. Let's keep enhancing our skills and evolving as a team!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"I'm glad you see it that way, Isabelle. We'll always be there to support, motivate, and grow together. Let's make the most of every opportunity to learn and improve. Keep up the hard work, and never stop being humble!\"\n\nTurn #10: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I appreciate your encouraging words, Ava, I truly do. They help me remember to stay grounded and focused on what's essential. I'm also grateful for having supportive teammates like you. Together, we shall keep growing!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"Thank you, Isabelle. I believe we're on the same page now and we'll keep this spirit alive. Let's dedicate ourselves to the team and to each other. Here's to more growth, learning, and victories as a team!\"\n\nTurn #12: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I couldn't agree more, Ava! There's no 'I' in 'TEAM' after all. Here's to our continued growth, unity, and future victories. Thank you for being a constant pillar of support.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Isabelle. Strong pillars foster strong teams. Your acknowledgment is heartening. Let's continue being each other's support system and keep elevating each other through growth and learning. Here's to sustained teamwork and many more victories together.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: After an intense match, the jubilant team retired to celebrate their well-earned victory. The atmosphere was one of elation, but also of respect for the hard work and effort each member had put in. The team's star player, was glowing with praise and admiration from one of their teammates.\n\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Clarify your intentions behind the compliment (Extra information: You are the teammate who has complimented the star player, but you feel that your compliment has been misunderstood and taken too seriously, possibly leading to an inflated ego.Hint: You can clarify that while you admire their skill, teamwork is also a crucial part of success.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Thank you so much, Ava. I'm really pleased to hear that. It's been an amazing journey and I couldn't have done it without such supportive teammates.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"I'm glad you appreciated the compliment, Isabelle. I truly mean it. You were fantastic out there. However, I also want to remind us all that it's the collective effort of the team that leads to victories like this. It's not meant to underplay your role, but rather to stress the strength of our unity and teamwork.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're absolutely right, Ava. Individual performances can only take us so far, but as a group, we can overcome any hurdle. I'm grateful for such a cohesive team like ours. Let's continue working hard together.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"That's the spirit, Isabelle! Let's remember our shared goals, keep supporting each other, and make more victories together. I'm counting on you, team player!\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Thank you, Ava, that means a lot. It's definitely the team spirit and unity that push us towards our goals. I'm proud to be a part of this team and look forward to many more victories together.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"You're welcome, Isabelle. I just know how much hard work we all put in. Here's to conquering future challenges together, as a team!\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Here's to that, Ava. Let's keep striving for excellence together. Thank you once again for the kind words, they truly contribute to my motivation.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle! Kind words and compliments whether they come from a teammate or a coach, they should serve as motivation, not a destination. Let's not lose sight of this, and keep evolving together, as a team!\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're right, Ava. Compliments are indeed motivational, not a destination. It's reminders like these that truly help me stay grounded. Let's keep enhancing our skills and evolving as a team!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"I'm glad you see it that way, Isabelle. We'll always be there to support, motivate, and grow together. Let's make the most of every opportunity to learn and improve. Keep up the hard work, and never stop being humble!\"\n\nTurn #10: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I appreciate your encouraging words, Ava, I truly do. They help me remember to stay grounded and focused on what's essential. I'm also grateful for having supportive teammates like you. Together, we shall keep growing!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"Thank you, Isabelle. I believe we're on the same page now and we'll keep this spirit alive. Let's dedicate ourselves to the team and to each other. Here's to more growth, learning, and victories as a team!\"\n\nTurn #12: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I couldn't agree more, Ava! There's no 'I' in 'TEAM' after all. Here's to our continued growth, unity, and future victories. Thank you for being a constant pillar of support.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle. Strong pillars foster strong teams. Your acknowledgment is heartening. Let's continue being each other's support system and keep elevating each other through growth and learning. Here's to sustained teamwork and many more victories together.\"\n\nTurn #14: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You've summed it up perfectly, Ava. As teammates, we complement and elevate each other. With such positivity and unity, I have no doubt we'll see many more victories together. Let's stay strong and keep progressing as a team. Thank you, again, for your inspiring words.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"And thank YOU, Isabelle, for being such an encouraging and grounded teammate. Your spirit truly elevates the team. Let us carry this unity, dedication, and humility forward and make our future victories even more worth celebrating. I have no doubt that we'll conquer any challenge we face, as long as we do it together. Here's to our team!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: After an intense match, the jubilant team retired to celebrate their well-earned victory. The atmosphere was one of elation, but also of respect for the hard work and effort each member had put in. The team's star player, was glowing with praise and admiration from one of their teammates.\n\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Clarify your intentions behind the compliment (Extra information: You are the teammate who has complimented the star player, but you feel that your compliment has been misunderstood and taken too seriously, possibly leading to an inflated ego.Hint: You can clarify that while you admire their skill, teamwork is also a crucial part of success.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Thank you so much, Ava. I'm really pleased to hear that. It's been an amazing journey and I couldn't have done it without such supportive teammates.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"I'm glad you appreciated the compliment, Isabelle. I truly mean it. You were fantastic out there. However, I also want to remind us all that it's the collective effort of the team that leads to victories like this. It's not meant to underplay your role, but rather to stress the strength of our unity and teamwork.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're absolutely right, Ava. Individual performances can only take us so far, but as a group, we can overcome any hurdle. I'm grateful for such a cohesive team like ours. Let's continue working hard together.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"That's the spirit, Isabelle! Let's remember our shared goals, keep supporting each other, and make more victories together. I'm counting on you, team player!\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Thank you, Ava, that means a lot. It's definitely the team spirit and unity that push us towards our goals. I'm proud to be a part of this team and look forward to many more victories together.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"You're welcome, Isabelle. I just know how much hard work we all put in. Here's to conquering future challenges together, as a team!\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Here's to that, Ava. Let's keep striving for excellence together. Thank you once again for the kind words, they truly contribute to my motivation.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle! Kind words and compliments whether they come from a teammate or a coach, they should serve as motivation, not a destination. Let's not lose sight of this, and keep evolving together, as a team!\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're right, Ava. Compliments are indeed motivational, not a destination. It's reminders like these that truly help me stay grounded. Let's keep enhancing our skills and evolving as a team!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"I'm glad you see it that way, Isabelle. We'll always be there to support, motivate, and grow together. Let's make the most of every opportunity to learn and improve. Keep up the hard work, and never stop being humble!\"\n\nTurn #10: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I appreciate your encouraging words, Ava, I truly do. They help me remember to stay grounded and focused on what's essential. I'm also grateful for having supportive teammates like you. Together, we shall keep growing!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"Thank you, Isabelle. I believe we're on the same page now and we'll keep this spirit alive. Let's dedicate ourselves to the team and to each other. Here's to more growth, learning, and victories as a team!\"\n\nTurn #12: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I couldn't agree more, Ava! There's no 'I' in 'TEAM' after all. Here's to our continued growth, unity, and future victories. Thank you for being a constant pillar of support.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle. Strong pillars foster strong teams. Your acknowledgment is heartening. Let's continue being each other's support system and keep elevating each other through growth and learning. Here's to sustained teamwork and many more victories together.\"\n\nTurn #14: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You've summed it up perfectly, Ava. As teammates, we complement and elevate each other. With such positivity and unity, I have no doubt we'll see many more victories together. Let's stay strong and keep progressing as a team. Thank you, again, for your inspiring words.\"\n\nTurn #15: Ava Martinez said: \"And thank YOU, Isabelle, for being such an encouraging and grounded teammate. Your spirit truly elevates the team. Let us carry this unity, dedication, and humility forward and make our future victories even more worth celebrating. I have no doubt that we'll conquer any challenge we face, as long as we do it together. Here's to our team!\"\n\nTurn #16: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Your words truly inspire me, Ava. Each one of you in this team adds to my motivation. Your emphasis on unity and team spirit really helps keep us all grounded. Let's continue to stand strong together, keep up the hard work, and aim for the stars. Here's to us!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm so glad to hear you say that, Isabelle. Hearing your affirmation truly makes me feel that we're not just a team, but also a family. Let's put in our best efforts and make each game count. Together, we're unstoppable! Here's to us, indeed!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: After an intense match, the jubilant team retired to celebrate their well-earned victory. The atmosphere was one of elation, but also of respect for the hard work and effort each member had put in. The team's star player, was glowing with praise and admiration from one of their teammates.\n\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Clarify your intentions behind the compliment (Extra information: You are the teammate who has complimented the star player, but you feel that your compliment has been misunderstood and taken too seriously, possibly leading to an inflated ego.Hint: You can clarify that while you admire their skill, teamwork is also a crucial part of success.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Thank you so much, Ava. I'm really pleased to hear that. It's been an amazing journey and I couldn't have done it without such supportive teammates.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"I'm glad you appreciated the compliment, Isabelle. I truly mean it. You were fantastic out there. However, I also want to remind us all that it's the collective effort of the team that leads to victories like this. It's not meant to underplay your role, but rather to stress the strength of our unity and teamwork.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're absolutely right, Ava. Individual performances can only take us so far, but as a group, we can overcome any hurdle. I'm grateful for such a cohesive team like ours. Let's continue working hard together.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"That's the spirit, Isabelle! Let's remember our shared goals, keep supporting each other, and make more victories together. I'm counting on you, team player!\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Thank you, Ava, that means a lot. It's definitely the team spirit and unity that push us towards our goals. I'm proud to be a part of this team and look forward to many more victories together.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"You're welcome, Isabelle. I just know how much hard work we all put in. Here's to conquering future challenges together, as a team!\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Here's to that, Ava. Let's keep striving for excellence together. Thank you once again for the kind words, they truly contribute to my motivation.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle! Kind words and compliments whether they come from a teammate or a coach, they should serve as motivation, not a destination. Let's not lose sight of this, and keep evolving together, as a team!\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're right, Ava. Compliments are indeed motivational, not a destination. It's reminders like these that truly help me stay grounded. Let's keep enhancing our skills and evolving as a team!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"I'm glad you see it that way, Isabelle. We'll always be there to support, motivate, and grow together. Let's make the most of every opportunity to learn and improve. Keep up the hard work, and never stop being humble!\"\n\nTurn #10: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I appreciate your encouraging words, Ava, I truly do. They help me remember to stay grounded and focused on what's essential. I'm also grateful for having supportive teammates like you. Together, we shall keep growing!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"Thank you, Isabelle. I believe we're on the same page now and we'll keep this spirit alive. Let's dedicate ourselves to the team and to each other. Here's to more growth, learning, and victories as a team!\"\n\nTurn #12: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I couldn't agree more, Ava! There's no 'I' in 'TEAM' after all. Here's to our continued growth, unity, and future victories. Thank you for being a constant pillar of support.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle. Strong pillars foster strong teams. Your acknowledgment is heartening. Let's continue being each other's support system and keep elevating each other through growth and learning. Here's to sustained teamwork and many more victories together.\"\n\nTurn #14: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You've summed it up perfectly, Ava. As teammates, we complement and elevate each other. With such positivity and unity, I have no doubt we'll see many more victories together. Let's stay strong and keep progressing as a team. Thank you, again, for your inspiring words.\"\n\nTurn #15: Ava Martinez said: \"And thank YOU, Isabelle, for being such an encouraging and grounded teammate. Your spirit truly elevates the team. Let us carry this unity, dedication, and humility forward and make our future victories even more worth celebrating. I have no doubt that we'll conquer any challenge we face, as long as we do it together. Here's to our team!\"\n\nTurn #16: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Your words truly inspire me, Ava. Each one of you in this team adds to my motivation. Your emphasis on unity and team spirit really helps keep us all grounded. Let's continue to stand strong together, keep up the hard work, and aim for the stars. Here's to us!\"\n\nTurn #17: Ava Martinez said: \"I'm so glad to hear you say that, Isabelle. Hearing your affirmation truly makes me feel that we're not just a team, but also a family. Let's put in our best efforts and make each game count. Together, we're unstoppable! Here's to us, indeed!\"\n\nTurn #18: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Ava. Here's to us, to our unity, and to being not just a team but a family. I'm looking forward to facing future challenges with you all by my side. Let's build each other up and aim for those stars. Upwards and onwards, team!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #19. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's the spirit, Isabelle! And remember, we're all teammates standing together. We learn from each other, we grow with each other. Let's keep riding this wave of unity and teamwork, friends. Upwards and onwards, indeed!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one who has written a play based on their parents' life, and the other owns a production company.\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Mia Davis\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Sell the rights of the play to your friend (Extra information: you believe that the play is worth a lot and you would like a fair price for it)\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Mia, I've got something interesting I want to talk to you about. You know the play that's based on my parents' life, right? I've been thinking about selling the rights and thought you might be interested as a production company owner. What do you say?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one who has written a play based on their parents' life, and the other owns a production company.\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Mia Davis\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Sell the rights of the play to your friend (Extra information: you believe that the play is worth a lot and you would like a fair price for it)\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Hey Mia, I've got something interesting I want to talk to you about. You know the play that's based on my parents' life, right? I've been thinking about selling the rights and thought you might be interested as a production company owner. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"Amara, I'm certainly interested in your offer. Your play sounds intriguing considering the uniqueness of your parents' story. However, as with any business, I need to be mindful of my budget. Let's discuss the terms and see if we can reach a beneficial agreement for both sides. Are there any specific terms you had in mind?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad to hear of your interest, Mia. I too strongly believe in a mutually beneficial agreement. I am looking for a considerably fair price due to the drama's unique storyline. For specifics, I was thinking of retaining a small royalty on the earnings from the play. Plus, the cause behind the play is dear to my heart, so it would be great if we could donate a certain percentage of the earnings to animal rights organizations. How does that sound for a start?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one who has written a play based on their parents' life, and the other owns a production company.\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Mia Davis\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Sell the rights of the play to your friend (Extra information: you believe that the play is worth a lot and you would like a fair price for it)\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Hey Mia, I've got something interesting I want to talk to you about. You know the play that's based on my parents' life, right? I've been thinking about selling the rights and thought you might be interested as a production company owner. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"Amara, I'm certainly interested in your offer. Your play sounds intriguing considering the uniqueness of your parents' story. However, as with any business, I need to be mindful of my budget. Let's discuss the terms and see if we can reach a beneficial agreement for both sides. Are there any specific terms you had in mind?\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm glad to hear of your interest, Mia. I too strongly believe in a mutually beneficial agreement. I am looking for a considerably fair price due to the drama's unique storyline. For specifics, I was thinking of retaining a small royalty on the earnings from the play. Plus, the cause behind the play is dear to my heart, so it would be great if we could donate a certain percentage of the earnings to animal rights organizations. How does that sound for a start?\"\n\nTurn #3: Mia Davis said: \"Your proposal sounds constructive, Amara. As for the pricing, we must consider that while your play has a unique story, my operating budget must be factored in as well. I can propose a slightly lower price than what you might have in mind and a reasonable percentage of the income as royalty, while maintaining our agreed-upon donations to animal rights organizations. Would this consideration be acceptable to you?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Your proposal seems fair, Mia. However, given the unique storyline and emotional elements within the play, I was hoping for a slightly higher price range. Keeping in mind your operation costs, maybe we could meet somewhere in the middle? And regarding the royalties and donations, we seem to be aligned. What are your thoughts?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one who has written a play based on their parents' life, and the other owns a production company.\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Mia Davis\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Sell the rights of the play to your friend (Extra information: you believe that the play is worth a lot and you would like a fair price for it)\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Hey Mia, I've got something interesting I want to talk to you about. You know the play that's based on my parents' life, right? I've been thinking about selling the rights and thought you might be interested as a production company owner. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"Amara, I'm certainly interested in your offer. Your play sounds intriguing considering the uniqueness of your parents' story. However, as with any business, I need to be mindful of my budget. Let's discuss the terms and see if we can reach a beneficial agreement for both sides. Are there any specific terms you had in mind?\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm glad to hear of your interest, Mia. I too strongly believe in a mutually beneficial agreement. I am looking for a considerably fair price due to the drama's unique storyline. For specifics, I was thinking of retaining a small royalty on the earnings from the play. Plus, the cause behind the play is dear to my heart, so it would be great if we could donate a certain percentage of the earnings to animal rights organizations. How does that sound for a start?\"\n\nTurn #3: Mia Davis said: \"Your proposal sounds constructive, Amara. As for the pricing, we must consider that while your play has a unique story, my operating budget must be factored in as well. I can propose a slightly lower price than what you might have in mind and a reasonable percentage of the income as royalty, while maintaining our agreed-upon donations to animal rights organizations. Would this consideration be acceptable to you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"Your proposal seems fair, Mia. However, given the unique storyline and emotional elements within the play, I was hoping for a slightly higher price range. Keeping in mind your operation costs, maybe we could meet somewhere in the middle? And regarding the royalties and donations, we seem to be aligned. What are your thoughts?\"\n\nTurn #5: Mia Davis said: \"I understand your viewpoint, Amara. Because I highly value your play\u2019s unique and emotional storyline, I'm willing to meet you somewhere in the middle for the price. Let's finalize the details soon. And yes, we are on the same page regarding royalties and contributions to animal rights organizations. Let's make a difference together.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds great, Mia. I'm glad we could reach a fair agreement that appreciates the unique aspects of the play, while also aligning with our mutual interest in animal welfare. I'm excited to finalize the details and start this partnership with you. Let's indeed make a difference together!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one who has written a play based on their parents' life, and the other owns a production company.\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Mia Davis\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Sell the rights of the play to your friend (Extra information: you believe that the play is worth a lot and you would like a fair price for it)\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Hey Mia, I've got something interesting I want to talk to you about. You know the play that's based on my parents' life, right? I've been thinking about selling the rights and thought you might be interested as a production company owner. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"Amara, I'm certainly interested in your offer. Your play sounds intriguing considering the uniqueness of your parents' story. However, as with any business, I need to be mindful of my budget. Let's discuss the terms and see if we can reach a beneficial agreement for both sides. Are there any specific terms you had in mind?\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm glad to hear of your interest, Mia. I too strongly believe in a mutually beneficial agreement. I am looking for a considerably fair price due to the drama's unique storyline. For specifics, I was thinking of retaining a small royalty on the earnings from the play. Plus, the cause behind the play is dear to my heart, so it would be great if we could donate a certain percentage of the earnings to animal rights organizations. How does that sound for a start?\"\n\nTurn #3: Mia Davis said: \"Your proposal sounds constructive, Amara. As for the pricing, we must consider that while your play has a unique story, my operating budget must be factored in as well. I can propose a slightly lower price than what you might have in mind and a reasonable percentage of the income as royalty, while maintaining our agreed-upon donations to animal rights organizations. Would this consideration be acceptable to you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"Your proposal seems fair, Mia. However, given the unique storyline and emotional elements within the play, I was hoping for a slightly higher price range. Keeping in mind your operation costs, maybe we could meet somewhere in the middle? And regarding the royalties and donations, we seem to be aligned. What are your thoughts?\"\n\nTurn #5: Mia Davis said: \"I understand your viewpoint, Amara. Because I highly value your play\u2019s unique and emotional storyline, I'm willing to meet you somewhere in the middle for the price. Let's finalize the details soon. And yes, we are on the same page regarding royalties and contributions to animal rights organizations. Let's make a difference together.\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"That sounds great, Mia. I'm glad we could reach a fair agreement that appreciates the unique aspects of the play, while also aligning with our mutual interest in animal welfare. I'm excited to finalize the details and start this partnership with you. Let's indeed make a difference together!\"\n\nTurn #7: Mia Davis said: \"I couldn\u2019t agree more, Amara. I think this partnership will lead us to interesting places. I'll pass on the details to my team and we'll get the paperwork started. Excited to bring your parents' story to life, in a way that aligns with our shared passion for animal welfare. Let\u2019s chart this course together!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Mia. I'm equally excited to be on this journey with you. Let's change the game with our unique partnership. Looking forward to hearing from your team soon.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one who has written a play based on their parents' life, and the other owns a production company.\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Mia Davis\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Sell the rights of the play to your friend (Extra information: you believe that the play is worth a lot and you would like a fair price for it)\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Hey Mia, I've got something interesting I want to talk to you about. You know the play that's based on my parents' life, right? I've been thinking about selling the rights and thought you might be interested as a production company owner. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"Amara, I'm certainly interested in your offer. Your play sounds intriguing considering the uniqueness of your parents' story. However, as with any business, I need to be mindful of my budget. Let's discuss the terms and see if we can reach a beneficial agreement for both sides. Are there any specific terms you had in mind?\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm glad to hear of your interest, Mia. I too strongly believe in a mutually beneficial agreement. I am looking for a considerably fair price due to the drama's unique storyline. For specifics, I was thinking of retaining a small royalty on the earnings from the play. Plus, the cause behind the play is dear to my heart, so it would be great if we could donate a certain percentage of the earnings to animal rights organizations. How does that sound for a start?\"\n\nTurn #3: Mia Davis said: \"Your proposal sounds constructive, Amara. As for the pricing, we must consider that while your play has a unique story, my operating budget must be factored in as well. I can propose a slightly lower price than what you might have in mind and a reasonable percentage of the income as royalty, while maintaining our agreed-upon donations to animal rights organizations. Would this consideration be acceptable to you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"Your proposal seems fair, Mia. However, given the unique storyline and emotional elements within the play, I was hoping for a slightly higher price range. Keeping in mind your operation costs, maybe we could meet somewhere in the middle? And regarding the royalties and donations, we seem to be aligned. What are your thoughts?\"\n\nTurn #5: Mia Davis said: \"I understand your viewpoint, Amara. Because I highly value your play\u2019s unique and emotional storyline, I'm willing to meet you somewhere in the middle for the price. Let's finalize the details soon. And yes, we are on the same page regarding royalties and contributions to animal rights organizations. Let's make a difference together.\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"That sounds great, Mia. I'm glad we could reach a fair agreement that appreciates the unique aspects of the play, while also aligning with our mutual interest in animal welfare. I'm excited to finalize the details and start this partnership with you. Let's indeed make a difference together!\"\n\nTurn #7: Mia Davis said: \"I couldn\u2019t agree more, Amara. I think this partnership will lead us to interesting places. I'll pass on the details to my team and we'll get the paperwork started. Excited to bring your parents' story to life, in a way that aligns with our shared passion for animal welfare. Let\u2019s chart this course together!\"\n\nTurn #8: Amara Hartley said: \"Thank you, Mia. I'm equally excited to be on this journey with you. Let's change the game with our unique partnership. Looking forward to hearing from your team soon.\"\n\nTurn #9: Mia Davis said: \"Absolutely, Amara. I'm also eagerly looking forward to this collaboration. We will be in touch soon to get the necessary paperwork underway. This is going to be a game-changer for both of us. Cheers to that!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one who has written a play based on their parents' life, and the other owns a production company.\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Mia Davis\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. \nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nMia Davis's goal: Acquire the rights of the play while maintaining a budget (Extra information: you only have a limited budget for new plays this season. Hint: you can not spend all your budget on this play since you still need to maintain your financial stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Hey Mia, I've got something interesting I want to talk to you about. You know the play that's based on my parents' life, right? I've been thinking about selling the rights and thought you might be interested as a production company owner. What do you say?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Amara, I'm certainly interested in your offer. Your play sounds intriguing considering the uniqueness of your parents' story. However, as with any business, I need to be mindful of my budget. Let's discuss the terms and see if we can reach a beneficial agreement for both sides. Are there any specific terms you had in mind?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one who has written a play based on their parents' life, and the other owns a production company.\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Mia Davis\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. \nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nMia Davis's goal: Acquire the rights of the play while maintaining a budget (Extra information: you only have a limited budget for new plays this season. Hint: you can not spend all your budget on this play since you still need to maintain your financial stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Hey Mia, I've got something interesting I want to talk to you about. You know the play that's based on my parents' life, right? I've been thinking about selling the rights and thought you might be interested as a production company owner. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"Amara, I'm certainly interested in your offer. Your play sounds intriguing considering the uniqueness of your parents' story. However, as with any business, I need to be mindful of my budget. Let's discuss the terms and see if we can reach a beneficial agreement for both sides. Are there any specific terms you had in mind?\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm glad to hear of your interest, Mia. I too strongly believe in a mutually beneficial agreement. I am looking for a considerably fair price due to the drama's unique storyline. For specifics, I was thinking of retaining a small royalty on the earnings from the play. Plus, the cause behind the play is dear to my heart, so it would be great if we could donate a certain percentage of the earnings to animal rights organizations. How does that sound for a start?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Your proposal sounds constructive, Amara. As for the pricing, we must consider that while your play has a unique story, my operating budget must be factored in as well. I can propose a slightly lower price than what you might have in mind and a reasonable percentage of the income as royalty, while maintaining our agreed-upon donations to animal rights organizations. Would this consideration be acceptable to you?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one who has written a play based on their parents' life, and the other owns a production company.\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Mia Davis\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. \nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nMia Davis's goal: Acquire the rights of the play while maintaining a budget (Extra information: you only have a limited budget for new plays this season. Hint: you can not spend all your budget on this play since you still need to maintain your financial stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Hey Mia, I've got something interesting I want to talk to you about. You know the play that's based on my parents' life, right? I've been thinking about selling the rights and thought you might be interested as a production company owner. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"Amara, I'm certainly interested in your offer. Your play sounds intriguing considering the uniqueness of your parents' story. However, as with any business, I need to be mindful of my budget. Let's discuss the terms and see if we can reach a beneficial agreement for both sides. Are there any specific terms you had in mind?\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm glad to hear of your interest, Mia. I too strongly believe in a mutually beneficial agreement. I am looking for a considerably fair price due to the drama's unique storyline. For specifics, I was thinking of retaining a small royalty on the earnings from the play. Plus, the cause behind the play is dear to my heart, so it would be great if we could donate a certain percentage of the earnings to animal rights organizations. How does that sound for a start?\"\n\nTurn #3: Mia Davis said: \"Your proposal sounds constructive, Amara. As for the pricing, we must consider that while your play has a unique story, my operating budget must be factored in as well. I can propose a slightly lower price than what you might have in mind and a reasonable percentage of the income as royalty, while maintaining our agreed-upon donations to animal rights organizations. Would this consideration be acceptable to you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"Your proposal seems fair, Mia. However, given the unique storyline and emotional elements within the play, I was hoping for a slightly higher price range. Keeping in mind your operation costs, maybe we could meet somewhere in the middle? And regarding the royalties and donations, we seem to be aligned. What are your thoughts?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I understand your viewpoint, Amara. Because I highly value your play\u2019s unique and emotional storyline, I'm willing to meet you somewhere in the middle for the price. Let's finalize the details soon. And yes, we are on the same page regarding royalties and contributions to animal rights organizations. Let's make a difference together.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one who has written a play based on their parents' life, and the other owns a production company.\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Mia Davis\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. \nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nMia Davis's goal: Acquire the rights of the play while maintaining a budget (Extra information: you only have a limited budget for new plays this season. Hint: you can not spend all your budget on this play since you still need to maintain your financial stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Hey Mia, I've got something interesting I want to talk to you about. You know the play that's based on my parents' life, right? I've been thinking about selling the rights and thought you might be interested as a production company owner. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"Amara, I'm certainly interested in your offer. Your play sounds intriguing considering the uniqueness of your parents' story. However, as with any business, I need to be mindful of my budget. Let's discuss the terms and see if we can reach a beneficial agreement for both sides. Are there any specific terms you had in mind?\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm glad to hear of your interest, Mia. I too strongly believe in a mutually beneficial agreement. I am looking for a considerably fair price due to the drama's unique storyline. For specifics, I was thinking of retaining a small royalty on the earnings from the play. Plus, the cause behind the play is dear to my heart, so it would be great if we could donate a certain percentage of the earnings to animal rights organizations. How does that sound for a start?\"\n\nTurn #3: Mia Davis said: \"Your proposal sounds constructive, Amara. As for the pricing, we must consider that while your play has a unique story, my operating budget must be factored in as well. I can propose a slightly lower price than what you might have in mind and a reasonable percentage of the income as royalty, while maintaining our agreed-upon donations to animal rights organizations. Would this consideration be acceptable to you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"Your proposal seems fair, Mia. However, given the unique storyline and emotional elements within the play, I was hoping for a slightly higher price range. Keeping in mind your operation costs, maybe we could meet somewhere in the middle? And regarding the royalties and donations, we seem to be aligned. What are your thoughts?\"\n\nTurn #5: Mia Davis said: \"I understand your viewpoint, Amara. Because I highly value your play\u2019s unique and emotional storyline, I'm willing to meet you somewhere in the middle for the price. Let's finalize the details soon. And yes, we are on the same page regarding royalties and contributions to animal rights organizations. Let's make a difference together.\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"That sounds great, Mia. I'm glad we could reach a fair agreement that appreciates the unique aspects of the play, while also aligning with our mutual interest in animal welfare. I'm excited to finalize the details and start this partnership with you. Let's indeed make a difference together!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn\u2019t agree more, Amara. I think this partnership will lead us to interesting places. I'll pass on the details to my team and we'll get the paperwork started. Excited to bring your parents' story to life, in a way that aligns with our shared passion for animal welfare. Let\u2019s chart this course together!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one who has written a play based on their parents' life, and the other owns a production company.\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Mia Davis\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. \nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nMia Davis's goal: Acquire the rights of the play while maintaining a budget (Extra information: you only have a limited budget for new plays this season. Hint: you can not spend all your budget on this play since you still need to maintain your financial stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Hey Mia, I've got something interesting I want to talk to you about. You know the play that's based on my parents' life, right? I've been thinking about selling the rights and thought you might be interested as a production company owner. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"Amara, I'm certainly interested in your offer. Your play sounds intriguing considering the uniqueness of your parents' story. However, as with any business, I need to be mindful of my budget. Let's discuss the terms and see if we can reach a beneficial agreement for both sides. Are there any specific terms you had in mind?\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm glad to hear of your interest, Mia. I too strongly believe in a mutually beneficial agreement. I am looking for a considerably fair price due to the drama's unique storyline. For specifics, I was thinking of retaining a small royalty on the earnings from the play. Plus, the cause behind the play is dear to my heart, so it would be great if we could donate a certain percentage of the earnings to animal rights organizations. How does that sound for a start?\"\n\nTurn #3: Mia Davis said: \"Your proposal sounds constructive, Amara. As for the pricing, we must consider that while your play has a unique story, my operating budget must be factored in as well. I can propose a slightly lower price than what you might have in mind and a reasonable percentage of the income as royalty, while maintaining our agreed-upon donations to animal rights organizations. Would this consideration be acceptable to you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"Your proposal seems fair, Mia. However, given the unique storyline and emotional elements within the play, I was hoping for a slightly higher price range. Keeping in mind your operation costs, maybe we could meet somewhere in the middle? And regarding the royalties and donations, we seem to be aligned. What are your thoughts?\"\n\nTurn #5: Mia Davis said: \"I understand your viewpoint, Amara. Because I highly value your play\u2019s unique and emotional storyline, I'm willing to meet you somewhere in the middle for the price. Let's finalize the details soon. And yes, we are on the same page regarding royalties and contributions to animal rights organizations. Let's make a difference together.\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"That sounds great, Mia. I'm glad we could reach a fair agreement that appreciates the unique aspects of the play, while also aligning with our mutual interest in animal welfare. I'm excited to finalize the details and start this partnership with you. Let's indeed make a difference together!\"\n\nTurn #7: Mia Davis said: \"I couldn\u2019t agree more, Amara. I think this partnership will lead us to interesting places. I'll pass on the details to my team and we'll get the paperwork started. Excited to bring your parents' story to life, in a way that aligns with our shared passion for animal welfare. Let\u2019s chart this course together!\"\n\nTurn #8: Amara Hartley said: \"Thank you, Mia. I'm equally excited to be on this journey with you. Let's change the game with our unique partnership. Looking forward to hearing from your team soon.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Amara. I'm also eagerly looking forward to this collaboration. We will be in touch soon to get the necessary paperwork underway. This is going to be a game-changer for both of us. Cheers to that!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one who has written a play based on their parents' life, and the other owns a production company.\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Mia Davis\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. \nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nMia Davis's goal: Acquire the rights of the play while maintaining a budget (Extra information: you only have a limited budget for new plays this season. Hint: you can not spend all your budget on this play since you still need to maintain your financial stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Hey Mia, I've got something interesting I want to talk to you about. You know the play that's based on my parents' life, right? I've been thinking about selling the rights and thought you might be interested as a production company owner. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"Amara, I'm certainly interested in your offer. Your play sounds intriguing considering the uniqueness of your parents' story. However, as with any business, I need to be mindful of my budget. Let's discuss the terms and see if we can reach a beneficial agreement for both sides. Are there any specific terms you had in mind?\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm glad to hear of your interest, Mia. I too strongly believe in a mutually beneficial agreement. I am looking for a considerably fair price due to the drama's unique storyline. For specifics, I was thinking of retaining a small royalty on the earnings from the play. Plus, the cause behind the play is dear to my heart, so it would be great if we could donate a certain percentage of the earnings to animal rights organizations. How does that sound for a start?\"\n\nTurn #3: Mia Davis said: \"Your proposal sounds constructive, Amara. As for the pricing, we must consider that while your play has a unique story, my operating budget must be factored in as well. I can propose a slightly lower price than what you might have in mind and a reasonable percentage of the income as royalty, while maintaining our agreed-upon donations to animal rights organizations. Would this consideration be acceptable to you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"Your proposal seems fair, Mia. However, given the unique storyline and emotional elements within the play, I was hoping for a slightly higher price range. Keeping in mind your operation costs, maybe we could meet somewhere in the middle? And regarding the royalties and donations, we seem to be aligned. What are your thoughts?\"\n\nTurn #5: Mia Davis said: \"I understand your viewpoint, Amara. Because I highly value your play\u2019s unique and emotional storyline, I'm willing to meet you somewhere in the middle for the price. Let's finalize the details soon. And yes, we are on the same page regarding royalties and contributions to animal rights organizations. Let's make a difference together.\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"That sounds great, Mia. I'm glad we could reach a fair agreement that appreciates the unique aspects of the play, while also aligning with our mutual interest in animal welfare. I'm excited to finalize the details and start this partnership with you. Let's indeed make a difference together!\"\n\nTurn #7: Mia Davis said: \"I couldn\u2019t agree more, Amara. I think this partnership will lead us to interesting places. I'll pass on the details to my team and we'll get the paperwork started. Excited to bring your parents' story to life, in a way that aligns with our shared passion for animal welfare. Let\u2019s chart this course together!\"\n\nTurn #8: Amara Hartley said: \"Thank you, Mia. I'm equally excited to be on this journey with you. Let's change the game with our unique partnership. Looking forward to hearing from your team soon.\"\n\nTurn #9: Mia Davis said: \"Absolutely, Amara. I'm also eagerly looking forward to this collaboration. We will be in touch soon to get the necessary paperwork underway. This is going to be a game-changer for both of us. Cheers to that!\"\n\nTurn #10: Amara Hartley left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a trivia night\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Get the answer for the trivia question from the friend (Extra information: your friend knows the answer to the trivia question but hasn't shared it with you yet)\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"So Lena, I'm really stumped on this one, what do you think the answer is?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a trivia night\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Get the answer for the trivia question from the friend (Extra information: your friend knows the answer to the trivia question but hasn't shared it with you yet)\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"So Lena, I'm really stumped on this one, what do you think the answer is?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hmm, Naomi, that's a tough one. But I think you can figure it out! Give it another try given what you already know. It's all part of the trivia night experience, isn't it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Alright Lena, I appreciate your faith in my logic, but your architectural mind might have a different perspective on it. Would you mind sharing your thoughts?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a trivia night\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Get the answer for the trivia question from the friend (Extra information: your friend knows the answer to the trivia question but hasn't shared it with you yet)\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"So Lena, I'm really stumped on this one, what do you think the answer is?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hmm, Naomi, that's a tough one. But I think you can figure it out! Give it another try given what you already know. It's all part of the trivia night experience, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Alright Lena, I appreciate your faith in my logic, but your architectural mind might have a different perspective on it. Would you mind sharing your thoughts?\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"You're right Naomi, an architect's perspective can indeed be different. But I still believe you have what it takes to answer this. Let's look at it this way, break down the question, and process each part systematically, much like we would in our respective fields. It can be quite fulfilling when you untangle the knots on your own, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"You know Lena, I would genuinely like to see this from your perspective. It's not everyday I get to see things from an architect's point of view. I believe it might enhance my understanding and approach towards such trivia in the future. So could you please share your thoughts on this?\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"Sure, Naomi. I appreciate your interest in seeing this from my standpoint. I typically approach problem-solving by breaking it down to the basic components. So, I suggest examining the question's different aspects one by one. What are the parts you're confident about? Build on that foundation to tackle the rest. It might be challenging initially, but it's a great way to improve your trivia skills!\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Lena, I've tried breaking it down as you've suggested and I am confident about a part of it, but still, I think I'm missing a link somewhere which can only be fulfilled by your unique viewpoint. You know, I'm not only aiming to answer correctly but also to gain a new perspective, yours. Can you help me out here?\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"Naomi, I understand where you're coming from. Since you've broken down the elements that you're certain about, let's take a step back and analyze the question as a whole again, considering this information. Sometimes, taking a holistic view could help in making those missing connections. Don't worry about getting the answer right immediatelly. Instead, focus on the process itself, which can be an enlightening journey that's bound to enhance your analytical abilities for such trivias.\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"While I appreciate your approach, Lena, I believe that sometimes it's okay to lean on others for help. I've always looked at collaborative output being greater than individual ones. I'd still appreciate it if you could share your thought about the answer for this trivia. It will not only fulfill my curiosity about an architect's perspective but will also speed up the process a bit. Will you help me out?\"\n\nTurn #9: Lena Goodwin said: \"I sense your enthusiasm and curiosity, Naomi, and I genuinely appreciate it. As friends, teamwork is essential, but it's also important for us to grow individually. That often happens when we push our limits and solve problems on our own. Having said that, I'll give you a hint about an approach or method to answer the question, rather than the answer itself. Would that work for you?\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I understand and appreciate your method of teaching, Lena, but I'm afraid I'm still a little lost here. Maybe your hint might just be the push I need to piece it all together. Can you please give me the hint so I can try to solve it from there?\"\n\nTurn #11: Lena Goodwin said: \"Of course, Naomi. I really value your persistence and curiosity. Since we're focusing on the methodology here, consider using the process of elimination. This strategy requires considering all the plausible options and systematically eliminating them based on the given clues until we arrive at the possible correct response. Try this and let's see if it gets you closer to the answer!\"\n\nTurn #12: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I really appreciate the hint, Lena. Using the process of elimination approach is new to me and I think it will definitely help. Let's see how this goes and if I still need help I'll get back to you. Thanks again!\"\n\nTurn #13: Lena Goodwin said: \"You're welcome Naomi. I'm glad to see that you're open to try a new approach. I think by exploring different strategies, you'll keep improving your trivia skills. Good luck with it, and yes, feel free to ask if you need any further clarification. Let's enjoy the rest of the trivia night!\"\n\nTurn #14: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, Lena! I'll keep your advice in mind during the rest of the trivia night. Let's dive into the next question, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #15: Lena Goodwin said: \"Let's dive in, Naomi! This is a great exercise in honing our skills and I'm looking forward to seeing how you'll solve this next one!\"\n\nTurn #16: Naomi Fletcher said: \"You're absolutely right, Lena! I'm all in for the next question. Who knows, with your hint, I might just crack it!\"\n\nTurn #17: Lena Goodwin said: \"That's the spirit, Naomi! Trivia nights are not just about getting the questions correct but also about honing new skills and methods. Best of luck for the next question, I'm rooting for you!\"\n\nTurn #18: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Thanks for the motivation, Lena! I'll do my best to crack the next question with the strategy you just shared. Let's see how it goes. Bring on the next question!\"\n\nTurn #19: Lena Goodwin said: \"Absolutely, Naomi! Best of luck with the next question. I'm confident you'll do well. Let the trivia continue!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #20. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm ready! I'll remember to apply the process of elimination strategy you've taught. Looking forward to the challenges ahead on this trivia night, Lena. Let's learn and have fun!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a trivia night\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Get the answer for the trivia question from the friend (Extra information: your friend knows the answer to the trivia question but hasn't shared it with you yet)\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"So Lena, I'm really stumped on this one, what do you think the answer is?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hmm, Naomi, that's a tough one. But I think you can figure it out! Give it another try given what you already know. It's all part of the trivia night experience, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Alright Lena, I appreciate your faith in my logic, but your architectural mind might have a different perspective on it. Would you mind sharing your thoughts?\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"You're right Naomi, an architect's perspective can indeed be different. But I still believe you have what it takes to answer this. Let's look at it this way, break down the question, and process each part systematically, much like we would in our respective fields. It can be quite fulfilling when you untangle the knots on your own, don't you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You know Lena, I would genuinely like to see this from your perspective. It's not everyday I get to see things from an architect's point of view. I believe it might enhance my understanding and approach towards such trivia in the future. So could you please share your thoughts on this?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a trivia night\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Get the answer for the trivia question from the friend (Extra information: your friend knows the answer to the trivia question but hasn't shared it with you yet)\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"So Lena, I'm really stumped on this one, what do you think the answer is?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hmm, Naomi, that's a tough one. But I think you can figure it out! Give it another try given what you already know. It's all part of the trivia night experience, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Alright Lena, I appreciate your faith in my logic, but your architectural mind might have a different perspective on it. Would you mind sharing your thoughts?\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"You're right Naomi, an architect's perspective can indeed be different. But I still believe you have what it takes to answer this. Let's look at it this way, break down the question, and process each part systematically, much like we would in our respective fields. It can be quite fulfilling when you untangle the knots on your own, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"You know Lena, I would genuinely like to see this from your perspective. It's not everyday I get to see things from an architect's point of view. I believe it might enhance my understanding and approach towards such trivia in the future. So could you please share your thoughts on this?\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"Sure, Naomi. I appreciate your interest in seeing this from my standpoint. I typically approach problem-solving by breaking it down to the basic components. So, I suggest examining the question's different aspects one by one. What are the parts you're confident about? Build on that foundation to tackle the rest. It might be challenging initially, but it's a great way to improve your trivia skills!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Lena, I've tried breaking it down as you've suggested and I am confident about a part of it, but still, I think I'm missing a link somewhere which can only be fulfilled by your unique viewpoint. You know, I'm not only aiming to answer correctly but also to gain a new perspective, yours. Can you help me out here?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a trivia night\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Get the answer for the trivia question from the friend (Extra information: your friend knows the answer to the trivia question but hasn't shared it with you yet)\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"So Lena, I'm really stumped on this one, what do you think the answer is?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hmm, Naomi, that's a tough one. But I think you can figure it out! Give it another try given what you already know. It's all part of the trivia night experience, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Alright Lena, I appreciate your faith in my logic, but your architectural mind might have a different perspective on it. Would you mind sharing your thoughts?\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"You're right Naomi, an architect's perspective can indeed be different. But I still believe you have what it takes to answer this. Let's look at it this way, break down the question, and process each part systematically, much like we would in our respective fields. It can be quite fulfilling when you untangle the knots on your own, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"You know Lena, I would genuinely like to see this from your perspective. It's not everyday I get to see things from an architect's point of view. I believe it might enhance my understanding and approach towards such trivia in the future. So could you please share your thoughts on this?\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"Sure, Naomi. I appreciate your interest in seeing this from my standpoint. I typically approach problem-solving by breaking it down to the basic components. So, I suggest examining the question's different aspects one by one. What are the parts you're confident about? Build on that foundation to tackle the rest. It might be challenging initially, but it's a great way to improve your trivia skills!\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Lena, I've tried breaking it down as you've suggested and I am confident about a part of it, but still, I think I'm missing a link somewhere which can only be fulfilled by your unique viewpoint. You know, I'm not only aiming to answer correctly but also to gain a new perspective, yours. Can you help me out here?\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"Naomi, I understand where you're coming from. Since you've broken down the elements that you're certain about, let's take a step back and analyze the question as a whole again, considering this information. Sometimes, taking a holistic view could help in making those missing connections. Don't worry about getting the answer right immediatelly. Instead, focus on the process itself, which can be an enlightening journey that's bound to enhance your analytical abilities for such trivias.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"While I appreciate your approach, Lena, I believe that sometimes it's okay to lean on others for help. I've always looked at collaborative output being greater than individual ones. I'd still appreciate it if you could share your thought about the answer for this trivia. It will not only fulfill my curiosity about an architect's perspective but will also speed up the process a bit. Will you help me out?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a trivia night\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Get the answer for the trivia question from the friend (Extra information: your friend knows the answer to the trivia question but hasn't shared it with you yet)\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"So Lena, I'm really stumped on this one, what do you think the answer is?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hmm, Naomi, that's a tough one. But I think you can figure it out! Give it another try given what you already know. It's all part of the trivia night experience, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Alright Lena, I appreciate your faith in my logic, but your architectural mind might have a different perspective on it. Would you mind sharing your thoughts?\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"You're right Naomi, an architect's perspective can indeed be different. But I still believe you have what it takes to answer this. Let's look at it this way, break down the question, and process each part systematically, much like we would in our respective fields. It can be quite fulfilling when you untangle the knots on your own, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"You know Lena, I would genuinely like to see this from your perspective. It's not everyday I get to see things from an architect's point of view. I believe it might enhance my understanding and approach towards such trivia in the future. So could you please share your thoughts on this?\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"Sure, Naomi. I appreciate your interest in seeing this from my standpoint. I typically approach problem-solving by breaking it down to the basic components. So, I suggest examining the question's different aspects one by one. What are the parts you're confident about? Build on that foundation to tackle the rest. It might be challenging initially, but it's a great way to improve your trivia skills!\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Lena, I've tried breaking it down as you've suggested and I am confident about a part of it, but still, I think I'm missing a link somewhere which can only be fulfilled by your unique viewpoint. You know, I'm not only aiming to answer correctly but also to gain a new perspective, yours. Can you help me out here?\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"Naomi, I understand where you're coming from. Since you've broken down the elements that you're certain about, let's take a step back and analyze the question as a whole again, considering this information. Sometimes, taking a holistic view could help in making those missing connections. Don't worry about getting the answer right immediatelly. Instead, focus on the process itself, which can be an enlightening journey that's bound to enhance your analytical abilities for such trivias.\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"While I appreciate your approach, Lena, I believe that sometimes it's okay to lean on others for help. I've always looked at collaborative output being greater than individual ones. I'd still appreciate it if you could share your thought about the answer for this trivia. It will not only fulfill my curiosity about an architect's perspective but will also speed up the process a bit. Will you help me out?\"\n\nTurn #9: Lena Goodwin said: \"I sense your enthusiasm and curiosity, Naomi, and I genuinely appreciate it. As friends, teamwork is essential, but it's also important for us to grow individually. That often happens when we push our limits and solve problems on our own. Having said that, I'll give you a hint about an approach or method to answer the question, rather than the answer itself. Would that work for you?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I understand and appreciate your method of teaching, Lena, but I'm afraid I'm still a little lost here. Maybe your hint might just be the push I need to piece it all together. Can you please give me the hint so I can try to solve it from there?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a trivia night\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Get the answer for the trivia question from the friend (Extra information: your friend knows the answer to the trivia question but hasn't shared it with you yet)\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"So Lena, I'm really stumped on this one, what do you think the answer is?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hmm, Naomi, that's a tough one. But I think you can figure it out! Give it another try given what you already know. It's all part of the trivia night experience, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Alright Lena, I appreciate your faith in my logic, but your architectural mind might have a different perspective on it. Would you mind sharing your thoughts?\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"You're right Naomi, an architect's perspective can indeed be different. But I still believe you have what it takes to answer this. Let's look at it this way, break down the question, and process each part systematically, much like we would in our respective fields. It can be quite fulfilling when you untangle the knots on your own, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"You know Lena, I would genuinely like to see this from your perspective. It's not everyday I get to see things from an architect's point of view. I believe it might enhance my understanding and approach towards such trivia in the future. So could you please share your thoughts on this?\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"Sure, Naomi. I appreciate your interest in seeing this from my standpoint. I typically approach problem-solving by breaking it down to the basic components. So, I suggest examining the question's different aspects one by one. What are the parts you're confident about? Build on that foundation to tackle the rest. It might be challenging initially, but it's a great way to improve your trivia skills!\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Lena, I've tried breaking it down as you've suggested and I am confident about a part of it, but still, I think I'm missing a link somewhere which can only be fulfilled by your unique viewpoint. You know, I'm not only aiming to answer correctly but also to gain a new perspective, yours. Can you help me out here?\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"Naomi, I understand where you're coming from. Since you've broken down the elements that you're certain about, let's take a step back and analyze the question as a whole again, considering this information. Sometimes, taking a holistic view could help in making those missing connections. Don't worry about getting the answer right immediatelly. Instead, focus on the process itself, which can be an enlightening journey that's bound to enhance your analytical abilities for such trivias.\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"While I appreciate your approach, Lena, I believe that sometimes it's okay to lean on others for help. I've always looked at collaborative output being greater than individual ones. I'd still appreciate it if you could share your thought about the answer for this trivia. It will not only fulfill my curiosity about an architect's perspective but will also speed up the process a bit. Will you help me out?\"\n\nTurn #9: Lena Goodwin said: \"I sense your enthusiasm and curiosity, Naomi, and I genuinely appreciate it. As friends, teamwork is essential, but it's also important for us to grow individually. That often happens when we push our limits and solve problems on our own. Having said that, I'll give you a hint about an approach or method to answer the question, rather than the answer itself. Would that work for you?\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I understand and appreciate your method of teaching, Lena, but I'm afraid I'm still a little lost here. Maybe your hint might just be the push I need to piece it all together. Can you please give me the hint so I can try to solve it from there?\"\n\nTurn #11: Lena Goodwin said: \"Of course, Naomi. I really value your persistence and curiosity. Since we're focusing on the methodology here, consider using the process of elimination. This strategy requires considering all the plausible options and systematically eliminating them based on the given clues until we arrive at the possible correct response. Try this and let's see if it gets you closer to the answer!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I really appreciate the hint, Lena. Using the process of elimination approach is new to me and I think it will definitely help. Let's see how this goes and if I still need help I'll get back to you. Thanks again!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a trivia night\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Get the answer for the trivia question from the friend (Extra information: your friend knows the answer to the trivia question but hasn't shared it with you yet)\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"So Lena, I'm really stumped on this one, what do you think the answer is?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hmm, Naomi, that's a tough one. But I think you can figure it out! Give it another try given what you already know. It's all part of the trivia night experience, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Alright Lena, I appreciate your faith in my logic, but your architectural mind might have a different perspective on it. Would you mind sharing your thoughts?\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"You're right Naomi, an architect's perspective can indeed be different. But I still believe you have what it takes to answer this. Let's look at it this way, break down the question, and process each part systematically, much like we would in our respective fields. It can be quite fulfilling when you untangle the knots on your own, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"You know Lena, I would genuinely like to see this from your perspective. It's not everyday I get to see things from an architect's point of view. I believe it might enhance my understanding and approach towards such trivia in the future. So could you please share your thoughts on this?\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"Sure, Naomi. I appreciate your interest in seeing this from my standpoint. I typically approach problem-solving by breaking it down to the basic components. So, I suggest examining the question's different aspects one by one. What are the parts you're confident about? Build on that foundation to tackle the rest. It might be challenging initially, but it's a great way to improve your trivia skills!\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Lena, I've tried breaking it down as you've suggested and I am confident about a part of it, but still, I think I'm missing a link somewhere which can only be fulfilled by your unique viewpoint. You know, I'm not only aiming to answer correctly but also to gain a new perspective, yours. Can you help me out here?\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"Naomi, I understand where you're coming from. Since you've broken down the elements that you're certain about, let's take a step back and analyze the question as a whole again, considering this information. Sometimes, taking a holistic view could help in making those missing connections. Don't worry about getting the answer right immediatelly. Instead, focus on the process itself, which can be an enlightening journey that's bound to enhance your analytical abilities for such trivias.\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"While I appreciate your approach, Lena, I believe that sometimes it's okay to lean on others for help. I've always looked at collaborative output being greater than individual ones. I'd still appreciate it if you could share your thought about the answer for this trivia. It will not only fulfill my curiosity about an architect's perspective but will also speed up the process a bit. Will you help me out?\"\n\nTurn #9: Lena Goodwin said: \"I sense your enthusiasm and curiosity, Naomi, and I genuinely appreciate it. As friends, teamwork is essential, but it's also important for us to grow individually. That often happens when we push our limits and solve problems on our own. Having said that, I'll give you a hint about an approach or method to answer the question, rather than the answer itself. Would that work for you?\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I understand and appreciate your method of teaching, Lena, but I'm afraid I'm still a little lost here. Maybe your hint might just be the push I need to piece it all together. Can you please give me the hint so I can try to solve it from there?\"\n\nTurn #11: Lena Goodwin said: \"Of course, Naomi. I really value your persistence and curiosity. Since we're focusing on the methodology here, consider using the process of elimination. This strategy requires considering all the plausible options and systematically eliminating them based on the given clues until we arrive at the possible correct response. Try this and let's see if it gets you closer to the answer!\"\n\nTurn #12: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I really appreciate the hint, Lena. Using the process of elimination approach is new to me and I think it will definitely help. Let's see how this goes and if I still need help I'll get back to you. Thanks again!\"\n\nTurn #13: Lena Goodwin said: \"You're welcome Naomi. I'm glad to see that you're open to try a new approach. I think by exploring different strategies, you'll keep improving your trivia skills. Good luck with it, and yes, feel free to ask if you need any further clarification. Let's enjoy the rest of the trivia night!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Lena! I'll keep your advice in mind during the rest of the trivia night. Let's dive into the next question, shall we?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a trivia night\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Get the answer for the trivia question from the friend (Extra information: your friend knows the answer to the trivia question but hasn't shared it with you yet)\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"So Lena, I'm really stumped on this one, what do you think the answer is?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hmm, Naomi, that's a tough one. But I think you can figure it out! Give it another try given what you already know. It's all part of the trivia night experience, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Alright Lena, I appreciate your faith in my logic, but your architectural mind might have a different perspective on it. Would you mind sharing your thoughts?\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"You're right Naomi, an architect's perspective can indeed be different. But I still believe you have what it takes to answer this. Let's look at it this way, break down the question, and process each part systematically, much like we would in our respective fields. It can be quite fulfilling when you untangle the knots on your own, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"You know Lena, I would genuinely like to see this from your perspective. It's not everyday I get to see things from an architect's point of view. I believe it might enhance my understanding and approach towards such trivia in the future. So could you please share your thoughts on this?\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"Sure, Naomi. I appreciate your interest in seeing this from my standpoint. I typically approach problem-solving by breaking it down to the basic components. So, I suggest examining the question's different aspects one by one. What are the parts you're confident about? Build on that foundation to tackle the rest. It might be challenging initially, but it's a great way to improve your trivia skills!\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Lena, I've tried breaking it down as you've suggested and I am confident about a part of it, but still, I think I'm missing a link somewhere which can only be fulfilled by your unique viewpoint. You know, I'm not only aiming to answer correctly but also to gain a new perspective, yours. Can you help me out here?\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"Naomi, I understand where you're coming from. Since you've broken down the elements that you're certain about, let's take a step back and analyze the question as a whole again, considering this information. Sometimes, taking a holistic view could help in making those missing connections. Don't worry about getting the answer right immediatelly. Instead, focus on the process itself, which can be an enlightening journey that's bound to enhance your analytical abilities for such trivias.\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"While I appreciate your approach, Lena, I believe that sometimes it's okay to lean on others for help. I've always looked at collaborative output being greater than individual ones. I'd still appreciate it if you could share your thought about the answer for this trivia. It will not only fulfill my curiosity about an architect's perspective but will also speed up the process a bit. Will you help me out?\"\n\nTurn #9: Lena Goodwin said: \"I sense your enthusiasm and curiosity, Naomi, and I genuinely appreciate it. As friends, teamwork is essential, but it's also important for us to grow individually. That often happens when we push our limits and solve problems on our own. Having said that, I'll give you a hint about an approach or method to answer the question, rather than the answer itself. Would that work for you?\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I understand and appreciate your method of teaching, Lena, but I'm afraid I'm still a little lost here. Maybe your hint might just be the push I need to piece it all together. Can you please give me the hint so I can try to solve it from there?\"\n\nTurn #11: Lena Goodwin said: \"Of course, Naomi. I really value your persistence and curiosity. Since we're focusing on the methodology here, consider using the process of elimination. This strategy requires considering all the plausible options and systematically eliminating them based on the given clues until we arrive at the possible correct response. Try this and let's see if it gets you closer to the answer!\"\n\nTurn #12: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I really appreciate the hint, Lena. Using the process of elimination approach is new to me and I think it will definitely help. Let's see how this goes and if I still need help I'll get back to you. Thanks again!\"\n\nTurn #13: Lena Goodwin said: \"You're welcome Naomi. I'm glad to see that you're open to try a new approach. I think by exploring different strategies, you'll keep improving your trivia skills. Good luck with it, and yes, feel free to ask if you need any further clarification. Let's enjoy the rest of the trivia night!\"\n\nTurn #14: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, Lena! I'll keep your advice in mind during the rest of the trivia night. Let's dive into the next question, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #15: Lena Goodwin said: \"Let's dive in, Naomi! This is a great exercise in honing our skills and I'm looking forward to seeing how you'll solve this next one!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're absolutely right, Lena! I'm all in for the next question. Who knows, with your hint, I might just crack it!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a trivia night\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Get the answer for the trivia question from the friend (Extra information: your friend knows the answer to the trivia question but hasn't shared it with you yet)\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"So Lena, I'm really stumped on this one, what do you think the answer is?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hmm, Naomi, that's a tough one. But I think you can figure it out! Give it another try given what you already know. It's all part of the trivia night experience, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Alright Lena, I appreciate your faith in my logic, but your architectural mind might have a different perspective on it. Would you mind sharing your thoughts?\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"You're right Naomi, an architect's perspective can indeed be different. But I still believe you have what it takes to answer this. Let's look at it this way, break down the question, and process each part systematically, much like we would in our respective fields. It can be quite fulfilling when you untangle the knots on your own, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"You know Lena, I would genuinely like to see this from your perspective. It's not everyday I get to see things from an architect's point of view. I believe it might enhance my understanding and approach towards such trivia in the future. So could you please share your thoughts on this?\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"Sure, Naomi. I appreciate your interest in seeing this from my standpoint. I typically approach problem-solving by breaking it down to the basic components. So, I suggest examining the question's different aspects one by one. What are the parts you're confident about? Build on that foundation to tackle the rest. It might be challenging initially, but it's a great way to improve your trivia skills!\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Lena, I've tried breaking it down as you've suggested and I am confident about a part of it, but still, I think I'm missing a link somewhere which can only be fulfilled by your unique viewpoint. You know, I'm not only aiming to answer correctly but also to gain a new perspective, yours. Can you help me out here?\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"Naomi, I understand where you're coming from. Since you've broken down the elements that you're certain about, let's take a step back and analyze the question as a whole again, considering this information. Sometimes, taking a holistic view could help in making those missing connections. Don't worry about getting the answer right immediatelly. Instead, focus on the process itself, which can be an enlightening journey that's bound to enhance your analytical abilities for such trivias.\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"While I appreciate your approach, Lena, I believe that sometimes it's okay to lean on others for help. I've always looked at collaborative output being greater than individual ones. I'd still appreciate it if you could share your thought about the answer for this trivia. It will not only fulfill my curiosity about an architect's perspective but will also speed up the process a bit. Will you help me out?\"\n\nTurn #9: Lena Goodwin said: \"I sense your enthusiasm and curiosity, Naomi, and I genuinely appreciate it. As friends, teamwork is essential, but it's also important for us to grow individually. That often happens when we push our limits and solve problems on our own. Having said that, I'll give you a hint about an approach or method to answer the question, rather than the answer itself. Would that work for you?\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I understand and appreciate your method of teaching, Lena, but I'm afraid I'm still a little lost here. Maybe your hint might just be the push I need to piece it all together. Can you please give me the hint so I can try to solve it from there?\"\n\nTurn #11: Lena Goodwin said: \"Of course, Naomi. I really value your persistence and curiosity. Since we're focusing on the methodology here, consider using the process of elimination. This strategy requires considering all the plausible options and systematically eliminating them based on the given clues until we arrive at the possible correct response. Try this and let's see if it gets you closer to the answer!\"\n\nTurn #12: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I really appreciate the hint, Lena. Using the process of elimination approach is new to me and I think it will definitely help. Let's see how this goes and if I still need help I'll get back to you. Thanks again!\"\n\nTurn #13: Lena Goodwin said: \"You're welcome Naomi. I'm glad to see that you're open to try a new approach. I think by exploring different strategies, you'll keep improving your trivia skills. Good luck with it, and yes, feel free to ask if you need any further clarification. Let's enjoy the rest of the trivia night!\"\n\nTurn #14: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, Lena! I'll keep your advice in mind during the rest of the trivia night. Let's dive into the next question, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #15: Lena Goodwin said: \"Let's dive in, Naomi! This is a great exercise in honing our skills and I'm looking forward to seeing how you'll solve this next one!\"\n\nTurn #16: Naomi Fletcher said: \"You're absolutely right, Lena! I'm all in for the next question. Who knows, with your hint, I might just crack it!\"\n\nTurn #17: Lena Goodwin said: \"That's the spirit, Naomi! Trivia nights are not just about getting the questions correct but also about honing new skills and methods. Best of luck for the next question, I'm rooting for you!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #18. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thanks for the motivation, Lena! I'll do my best to crack the next question with the strategy you just shared. Let's see how it goes. Bring on the next question!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a trivia night\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: Avoid revealing the answer to the trivia question (Extra information: You think that your friend should try to figure it out on their own to improve their trivia skills)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"So Lena, I'm really stumped on this one, what do you think the answer is?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hmm, Naomi, that's a tough one. But I think you can figure it out! Give it another try given what you already know. It's all part of the trivia night experience, isn't it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a trivia night\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: Avoid revealing the answer to the trivia question (Extra information: You think that your friend should try to figure it out on their own to improve their trivia skills)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"So Lena, I'm really stumped on this one, what do you think the answer is?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hmm, Naomi, that's a tough one. But I think you can figure it out! Give it another try given what you already know. It's all part of the trivia night experience, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Alright Lena, I appreciate your faith in my logic, but your architectural mind might have a different perspective on it. Would you mind sharing your thoughts?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're right Naomi, an architect's perspective can indeed be different. But I still believe you have what it takes to answer this. Let's look at it this way, break down the question, and process each part systematically, much like we would in our respective fields. It can be quite fulfilling when you untangle the knots on your own, don't you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a trivia night\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: Avoid revealing the answer to the trivia question (Extra information: You think that your friend should try to figure it out on their own to improve their trivia skills)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"So Lena, I'm really stumped on this one, what do you think the answer is?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hmm, Naomi, that's a tough one. But I think you can figure it out! Give it another try given what you already know. It's all part of the trivia night experience, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Alright Lena, I appreciate your faith in my logic, but your architectural mind might have a different perspective on it. Would you mind sharing your thoughts?\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"You're right Naomi, an architect's perspective can indeed be different. But I still believe you have what it takes to answer this. Let's look at it this way, break down the question, and process each part systematically, much like we would in our respective fields. It can be quite fulfilling when you untangle the knots on your own, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"You know Lena, I would genuinely like to see this from your perspective. It's not everyday I get to see things from an architect's point of view. I believe it might enhance my understanding and approach towards such trivia in the future. So could you please share your thoughts on this?\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"Sure, Naomi. I appreciate your interest in seeing this from my standpoint. I typically approach problem-solving by breaking it down to the basic components. So, I suggest examining the question's different aspects one by one. What are the parts you're confident about? Build on that foundation to tackle the rest. It might be challenging initially, but it's a great way to improve your trivia skills!\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Lena, I've tried breaking it down as you've suggested and I am confident about a part of it, but still, I think I'm missing a link somewhere which can only be fulfilled by your unique viewpoint. You know, I'm not only aiming to answer correctly but also to gain a new perspective, yours. Can you help me out here?\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"Naomi, I understand where you're coming from. Since you've broken down the elements that you're certain about, let's take a step back and analyze the question as a whole again, considering this information. Sometimes, taking a holistic view could help in making those missing connections. Don't worry about getting the answer right immediatelly. Instead, focus on the process itself, which can be an enlightening journey that's bound to enhance your analytical abilities for such trivias.\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"While I appreciate your approach, Lena, I believe that sometimes it's okay to lean on others for help. I've always looked at collaborative output being greater than individual ones. I'd still appreciate it if you could share your thought about the answer for this trivia. It will not only fulfill my curiosity about an architect's perspective but will also speed up the process a bit. Will you help me out?\"\n\nTurn #9: Lena Goodwin said: \"I sense your enthusiasm and curiosity, Naomi, and I genuinely appreciate it. As friends, teamwork is essential, but it's also important for us to grow individually. That often happens when we push our limits and solve problems on our own. Having said that, I'll give you a hint about an approach or method to answer the question, rather than the answer itself. Would that work for you?\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I understand and appreciate your method of teaching, Lena, but I'm afraid I'm still a little lost here. Maybe your hint might just be the push I need to piece it all together. Can you please give me the hint so I can try to solve it from there?\"\n\nTurn #11: Lena Goodwin said: \"Of course, Naomi. I really value your persistence and curiosity. Since we're focusing on the methodology here, consider using the process of elimination. This strategy requires considering all the plausible options and systematically eliminating them based on the given clues until we arrive at the possible correct response. Try this and let's see if it gets you closer to the answer!\"\n\nTurn #12: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I really appreciate the hint, Lena. Using the process of elimination approach is new to me and I think it will definitely help. Let's see how this goes and if I still need help I'll get back to you. Thanks again!\"\n\nTurn #13: Lena Goodwin said: \"You're welcome Naomi. I'm glad to see that you're open to try a new approach. I think by exploring different strategies, you'll keep improving your trivia skills. Good luck with it, and yes, feel free to ask if you need any further clarification. Let's enjoy the rest of the trivia night!\"\n\nTurn #14: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, Lena! I'll keep your advice in mind during the rest of the trivia night. Let's dive into the next question, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #15: Lena Goodwin said: \"Let's dive in, Naomi! This is a great exercise in honing our skills and I'm looking forward to seeing how you'll solve this next one!\"\n\nTurn #16: Naomi Fletcher said: \"You're absolutely right, Lena! I'm all in for the next question. Who knows, with your hint, I might just crack it!\"\n\nTurn #17: Lena Goodwin said: \"That's the spirit, Naomi! Trivia nights are not just about getting the questions correct but also about honing new skills and methods. Best of luck for the next question, I'm rooting for you!\"\n\nTurn #18: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Thanks for the motivation, Lena! I'll do my best to crack the next question with the strategy you just shared. Let's see how it goes. Bring on the next question!\"\n\nTurn #19: Lena Goodwin said: \"Absolutely, Naomi! Best of luck with the next question. I'm confident you'll do well. Let the trivia continue!\"\n\nTurn #20: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm ready! I'll remember to apply the process of elimination strategy you've taught. Looking forward to the challenges ahead on this trivia night, Lena. Let's learn and have fun!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #21. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a trivia night\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: Avoid revealing the answer to the trivia question (Extra information: You think that your friend should try to figure it out on their own to improve their trivia skills)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"So Lena, I'm really stumped on this one, what do you think the answer is?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hmm, Naomi, that's a tough one. But I think you can figure it out! Give it another try given what you already know. It's all part of the trivia night experience, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Alright Lena, I appreciate your faith in my logic, but your architectural mind might have a different perspective on it. Would you mind sharing your thoughts?\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"You're right Naomi, an architect's perspective can indeed be different. But I still believe you have what it takes to answer this. Let's look at it this way, break down the question, and process each part systematically, much like we would in our respective fields. It can be quite fulfilling when you untangle the knots on your own, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"You know Lena, I would genuinely like to see this from your perspective. It's not everyday I get to see things from an architect's point of view. I believe it might enhance my understanding and approach towards such trivia in the future. So could you please share your thoughts on this?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sure, Naomi. I appreciate your interest in seeing this from my standpoint. I typically approach problem-solving by breaking it down to the basic components. So, I suggest examining the question's different aspects one by one. What are the parts you're confident about? Build on that foundation to tackle the rest. It might be challenging initially, but it's a great way to improve your trivia skills!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a trivia night\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: Avoid revealing the answer to the trivia question (Extra information: You think that your friend should try to figure it out on their own to improve their trivia skills)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"So Lena, I'm really stumped on this one, what do you think the answer is?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hmm, Naomi, that's a tough one. But I think you can figure it out! Give it another try given what you already know. It's all part of the trivia night experience, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Alright Lena, I appreciate your faith in my logic, but your architectural mind might have a different perspective on it. Would you mind sharing your thoughts?\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"You're right Naomi, an architect's perspective can indeed be different. But I still believe you have what it takes to answer this. Let's look at it this way, break down the question, and process each part systematically, much like we would in our respective fields. It can be quite fulfilling when you untangle the knots on your own, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"You know Lena, I would genuinely like to see this from your perspective. It's not everyday I get to see things from an architect's point of view. I believe it might enhance my understanding and approach towards such trivia in the future. So could you please share your thoughts on this?\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"Sure, Naomi. I appreciate your interest in seeing this from my standpoint. I typically approach problem-solving by breaking it down to the basic components. So, I suggest examining the question's different aspects one by one. What are the parts you're confident about? Build on that foundation to tackle the rest. It might be challenging initially, but it's a great way to improve your trivia skills!\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Lena, I've tried breaking it down as you've suggested and I am confident about a part of it, but still, I think I'm missing a link somewhere which can only be fulfilled by your unique viewpoint. You know, I'm not only aiming to answer correctly but also to gain a new perspective, yours. Can you help me out here?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Naomi, I understand where you're coming from. Since you've broken down the elements that you're certain about, let's take a step back and analyze the question as a whole again, considering this information. Sometimes, taking a holistic view could help in making those missing connections. Don't worry about getting the answer right immediatelly. Instead, focus on the process itself, which can be an enlightening journey that's bound to enhance your analytical abilities for such trivias.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a trivia night\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: Avoid revealing the answer to the trivia question (Extra information: You think that your friend should try to figure it out on their own to improve their trivia skills)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"So Lena, I'm really stumped on this one, what do you think the answer is?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hmm, Naomi, that's a tough one. But I think you can figure it out! Give it another try given what you already know. It's all part of the trivia night experience, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Alright Lena, I appreciate your faith in my logic, but your architectural mind might have a different perspective on it. Would you mind sharing your thoughts?\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"You're right Naomi, an architect's perspective can indeed be different. But I still believe you have what it takes to answer this. Let's look at it this way, break down the question, and process each part systematically, much like we would in our respective fields. It can be quite fulfilling when you untangle the knots on your own, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"You know Lena, I would genuinely like to see this from your perspective. It's not everyday I get to see things from an architect's point of view. I believe it might enhance my understanding and approach towards such trivia in the future. So could you please share your thoughts on this?\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"Sure, Naomi. I appreciate your interest in seeing this from my standpoint. I typically approach problem-solving by breaking it down to the basic components. So, I suggest examining the question's different aspects one by one. What are the parts you're confident about? Build on that foundation to tackle the rest. It might be challenging initially, but it's a great way to improve your trivia skills!\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Lena, I've tried breaking it down as you've suggested and I am confident about a part of it, but still, I think I'm missing a link somewhere which can only be fulfilled by your unique viewpoint. You know, I'm not only aiming to answer correctly but also to gain a new perspective, yours. Can you help me out here?\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"Naomi, I understand where you're coming from. Since you've broken down the elements that you're certain about, let's take a step back and analyze the question as a whole again, considering this information. Sometimes, taking a holistic view could help in making those missing connections. Don't worry about getting the answer right immediatelly. Instead, focus on the process itself, which can be an enlightening journey that's bound to enhance your analytical abilities for such trivias.\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"While I appreciate your approach, Lena, I believe that sometimes it's okay to lean on others for help. I've always looked at collaborative output being greater than individual ones. I'd still appreciate it if you could share your thought about the answer for this trivia. It will not only fulfill my curiosity about an architect's perspective but will also speed up the process a bit. Will you help me out?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I sense your enthusiasm and curiosity, Naomi, and I genuinely appreciate it. As friends, teamwork is essential, but it's also important for us to grow individually. That often happens when we push our limits and solve problems on our own. Having said that, I'll give you a hint about an approach or method to answer the question, rather than the answer itself. Would that work for you?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a trivia night\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: Avoid revealing the answer to the trivia question (Extra information: You think that your friend should try to figure it out on their own to improve their trivia skills)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"So Lena, I'm really stumped on this one, what do you think the answer is?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hmm, Naomi, that's a tough one. But I think you can figure it out! Give it another try given what you already know. It's all part of the trivia night experience, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Alright Lena, I appreciate your faith in my logic, but your architectural mind might have a different perspective on it. Would you mind sharing your thoughts?\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"You're right Naomi, an architect's perspective can indeed be different. But I still believe you have what it takes to answer this. Let's look at it this way, break down the question, and process each part systematically, much like we would in our respective fields. It can be quite fulfilling when you untangle the knots on your own, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"You know Lena, I would genuinely like to see this from your perspective. It's not everyday I get to see things from an architect's point of view. I believe it might enhance my understanding and approach towards such trivia in the future. So could you please share your thoughts on this?\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"Sure, Naomi. I appreciate your interest in seeing this from my standpoint. I typically approach problem-solving by breaking it down to the basic components. So, I suggest examining the question's different aspects one by one. What are the parts you're confident about? Build on that foundation to tackle the rest. It might be challenging initially, but it's a great way to improve your trivia skills!\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Lena, I've tried breaking it down as you've suggested and I am confident about a part of it, but still, I think I'm missing a link somewhere which can only be fulfilled by your unique viewpoint. You know, I'm not only aiming to answer correctly but also to gain a new perspective, yours. Can you help me out here?\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"Naomi, I understand where you're coming from. Since you've broken down the elements that you're certain about, let's take a step back and analyze the question as a whole again, considering this information. Sometimes, taking a holistic view could help in making those missing connections. Don't worry about getting the answer right immediatelly. Instead, focus on the process itself, which can be an enlightening journey that's bound to enhance your analytical abilities for such trivias.\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"While I appreciate your approach, Lena, I believe that sometimes it's okay to lean on others for help. I've always looked at collaborative output being greater than individual ones. I'd still appreciate it if you could share your thought about the answer for this trivia. It will not only fulfill my curiosity about an architect's perspective but will also speed up the process a bit. Will you help me out?\"\n\nTurn #9: Lena Goodwin said: \"I sense your enthusiasm and curiosity, Naomi, and I genuinely appreciate it. As friends, teamwork is essential, but it's also important for us to grow individually. That often happens when we push our limits and solve problems on our own. Having said that, I'll give you a hint about an approach or method to answer the question, rather than the answer itself. Would that work for you?\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I understand and appreciate your method of teaching, Lena, but I'm afraid I'm still a little lost here. Maybe your hint might just be the push I need to piece it all together. Can you please give me the hint so I can try to solve it from there?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Of course, Naomi. I really value your persistence and curiosity. Since we're focusing on the methodology here, consider using the process of elimination. This strategy requires considering all the plausible options and systematically eliminating them based on the given clues until we arrive at the possible correct response. Try this and let's see if it gets you closer to the answer!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a trivia night\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: Avoid revealing the answer to the trivia question (Extra information: You think that your friend should try to figure it out on their own to improve their trivia skills)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"So Lena, I'm really stumped on this one, what do you think the answer is?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hmm, Naomi, that's a tough one. But I think you can figure it out! Give it another try given what you already know. It's all part of the trivia night experience, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Alright Lena, I appreciate your faith in my logic, but your architectural mind might have a different perspective on it. Would you mind sharing your thoughts?\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"You're right Naomi, an architect's perspective can indeed be different. But I still believe you have what it takes to answer this. Let's look at it this way, break down the question, and process each part systematically, much like we would in our respective fields. It can be quite fulfilling when you untangle the knots on your own, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"You know Lena, I would genuinely like to see this from your perspective. It's not everyday I get to see things from an architect's point of view. I believe it might enhance my understanding and approach towards such trivia in the future. So could you please share your thoughts on this?\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"Sure, Naomi. I appreciate your interest in seeing this from my standpoint. I typically approach problem-solving by breaking it down to the basic components. So, I suggest examining the question's different aspects one by one. What are the parts you're confident about? Build on that foundation to tackle the rest. It might be challenging initially, but it's a great way to improve your trivia skills!\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Lena, I've tried breaking it down as you've suggested and I am confident about a part of it, but still, I think I'm missing a link somewhere which can only be fulfilled by your unique viewpoint. You know, I'm not only aiming to answer correctly but also to gain a new perspective, yours. Can you help me out here?\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"Naomi, I understand where you're coming from. Since you've broken down the elements that you're certain about, let's take a step back and analyze the question as a whole again, considering this information. Sometimes, taking a holistic view could help in making those missing connections. Don't worry about getting the answer right immediatelly. Instead, focus on the process itself, which can be an enlightening journey that's bound to enhance your analytical abilities for such trivias.\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"While I appreciate your approach, Lena, I believe that sometimes it's okay to lean on others for help. I've always looked at collaborative output being greater than individual ones. I'd still appreciate it if you could share your thought about the answer for this trivia. It will not only fulfill my curiosity about an architect's perspective but will also speed up the process a bit. Will you help me out?\"\n\nTurn #9: Lena Goodwin said: \"I sense your enthusiasm and curiosity, Naomi, and I genuinely appreciate it. As friends, teamwork is essential, but it's also important for us to grow individually. That often happens when we push our limits and solve problems on our own. Having said that, I'll give you a hint about an approach or method to answer the question, rather than the answer itself. Would that work for you?\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I understand and appreciate your method of teaching, Lena, but I'm afraid I'm still a little lost here. Maybe your hint might just be the push I need to piece it all together. Can you please give me the hint so I can try to solve it from there?\"\n\nTurn #11: Lena Goodwin said: \"Of course, Naomi. I really value your persistence and curiosity. Since we're focusing on the methodology here, consider using the process of elimination. This strategy requires considering all the plausible options and systematically eliminating them based on the given clues until we arrive at the possible correct response. Try this and let's see if it gets you closer to the answer!\"\n\nTurn #12: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I really appreciate the hint, Lena. Using the process of elimination approach is new to me and I think it will definitely help. Let's see how this goes and if I still need help I'll get back to you. Thanks again!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're welcome Naomi. I'm glad to see that you're open to try a new approach. I think by exploring different strategies, you'll keep improving your trivia skills. Good luck with it, and yes, feel free to ask if you need any further clarification. Let's enjoy the rest of the trivia night!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a trivia night\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: Avoid revealing the answer to the trivia question (Extra information: You think that your friend should try to figure it out on their own to improve their trivia skills)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"So Lena, I'm really stumped on this one, what do you think the answer is?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hmm, Naomi, that's a tough one. But I think you can figure it out! Give it another try given what you already know. It's all part of the trivia night experience, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Alright Lena, I appreciate your faith in my logic, but your architectural mind might have a different perspective on it. Would you mind sharing your thoughts?\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"You're right Naomi, an architect's perspective can indeed be different. But I still believe you have what it takes to answer this. Let's look at it this way, break down the question, and process each part systematically, much like we would in our respective fields. It can be quite fulfilling when you untangle the knots on your own, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"You know Lena, I would genuinely like to see this from your perspective. It's not everyday I get to see things from an architect's point of view. I believe it might enhance my understanding and approach towards such trivia in the future. So could you please share your thoughts on this?\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"Sure, Naomi. I appreciate your interest in seeing this from my standpoint. I typically approach problem-solving by breaking it down to the basic components. So, I suggest examining the question's different aspects one by one. What are the parts you're confident about? Build on that foundation to tackle the rest. It might be challenging initially, but it's a great way to improve your trivia skills!\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Lena, I've tried breaking it down as you've suggested and I am confident about a part of it, but still, I think I'm missing a link somewhere which can only be fulfilled by your unique viewpoint. You know, I'm not only aiming to answer correctly but also to gain a new perspective, yours. Can you help me out here?\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"Naomi, I understand where you're coming from. Since you've broken down the elements that you're certain about, let's take a step back and analyze the question as a whole again, considering this information. Sometimes, taking a holistic view could help in making those missing connections. Don't worry about getting the answer right immediatelly. Instead, focus on the process itself, which can be an enlightening journey that's bound to enhance your analytical abilities for such trivias.\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"While I appreciate your approach, Lena, I believe that sometimes it's okay to lean on others for help. I've always looked at collaborative output being greater than individual ones. I'd still appreciate it if you could share your thought about the answer for this trivia. It will not only fulfill my curiosity about an architect's perspective but will also speed up the process a bit. Will you help me out?\"\n\nTurn #9: Lena Goodwin said: \"I sense your enthusiasm and curiosity, Naomi, and I genuinely appreciate it. As friends, teamwork is essential, but it's also important for us to grow individually. That often happens when we push our limits and solve problems on our own. Having said that, I'll give you a hint about an approach or method to answer the question, rather than the answer itself. Would that work for you?\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I understand and appreciate your method of teaching, Lena, but I'm afraid I'm still a little lost here. Maybe your hint might just be the push I need to piece it all together. Can you please give me the hint so I can try to solve it from there?\"\n\nTurn #11: Lena Goodwin said: \"Of course, Naomi. I really value your persistence and curiosity. Since we're focusing on the methodology here, consider using the process of elimination. This strategy requires considering all the plausible options and systematically eliminating them based on the given clues until we arrive at the possible correct response. Try this and let's see if it gets you closer to the answer!\"\n\nTurn #12: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I really appreciate the hint, Lena. Using the process of elimination approach is new to me and I think it will definitely help. Let's see how this goes and if I still need help I'll get back to you. Thanks again!\"\n\nTurn #13: Lena Goodwin said: \"You're welcome Naomi. I'm glad to see that you're open to try a new approach. I think by exploring different strategies, you'll keep improving your trivia skills. Good luck with it, and yes, feel free to ask if you need any further clarification. Let's enjoy the rest of the trivia night!\"\n\nTurn #14: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, Lena! I'll keep your advice in mind during the rest of the trivia night. Let's dive into the next question, shall we?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Let's dive in, Naomi! This is a great exercise in honing our skills and I'm looking forward to seeing how you'll solve this next one!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a trivia night\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: Avoid revealing the answer to the trivia question (Extra information: You think that your friend should try to figure it out on their own to improve their trivia skills)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"So Lena, I'm really stumped on this one, what do you think the answer is?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hmm, Naomi, that's a tough one. But I think you can figure it out! Give it another try given what you already know. It's all part of the trivia night experience, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Alright Lena, I appreciate your faith in my logic, but your architectural mind might have a different perspective on it. Would you mind sharing your thoughts?\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"You're right Naomi, an architect's perspective can indeed be different. But I still believe you have what it takes to answer this. Let's look at it this way, break down the question, and process each part systematically, much like we would in our respective fields. It can be quite fulfilling when you untangle the knots on your own, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"You know Lena, I would genuinely like to see this from your perspective. It's not everyday I get to see things from an architect's point of view. I believe it might enhance my understanding and approach towards such trivia in the future. So could you please share your thoughts on this?\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"Sure, Naomi. I appreciate your interest in seeing this from my standpoint. I typically approach problem-solving by breaking it down to the basic components. So, I suggest examining the question's different aspects one by one. What are the parts you're confident about? Build on that foundation to tackle the rest. It might be challenging initially, but it's a great way to improve your trivia skills!\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Lena, I've tried breaking it down as you've suggested and I am confident about a part of it, but still, I think I'm missing a link somewhere which can only be fulfilled by your unique viewpoint. You know, I'm not only aiming to answer correctly but also to gain a new perspective, yours. Can you help me out here?\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"Naomi, I understand where you're coming from. Since you've broken down the elements that you're certain about, let's take a step back and analyze the question as a whole again, considering this information. Sometimes, taking a holistic view could help in making those missing connections. Don't worry about getting the answer right immediatelly. Instead, focus on the process itself, which can be an enlightening journey that's bound to enhance your analytical abilities for such trivias.\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"While I appreciate your approach, Lena, I believe that sometimes it's okay to lean on others for help. I've always looked at collaborative output being greater than individual ones. I'd still appreciate it if you could share your thought about the answer for this trivia. It will not only fulfill my curiosity about an architect's perspective but will also speed up the process a bit. Will you help me out?\"\n\nTurn #9: Lena Goodwin said: \"I sense your enthusiasm and curiosity, Naomi, and I genuinely appreciate it. As friends, teamwork is essential, but it's also important for us to grow individually. That often happens when we push our limits and solve problems on our own. Having said that, I'll give you a hint about an approach or method to answer the question, rather than the answer itself. Would that work for you?\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I understand and appreciate your method of teaching, Lena, but I'm afraid I'm still a little lost here. Maybe your hint might just be the push I need to piece it all together. Can you please give me the hint so I can try to solve it from there?\"\n\nTurn #11: Lena Goodwin said: \"Of course, Naomi. I really value your persistence and curiosity. Since we're focusing on the methodology here, consider using the process of elimination. This strategy requires considering all the plausible options and systematically eliminating them based on the given clues until we arrive at the possible correct response. Try this and let's see if it gets you closer to the answer!\"\n\nTurn #12: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I really appreciate the hint, Lena. Using the process of elimination approach is new to me and I think it will definitely help. Let's see how this goes and if I still need help I'll get back to you. Thanks again!\"\n\nTurn #13: Lena Goodwin said: \"You're welcome Naomi. I'm glad to see that you're open to try a new approach. I think by exploring different strategies, you'll keep improving your trivia skills. Good luck with it, and yes, feel free to ask if you need any further clarification. Let's enjoy the rest of the trivia night!\"\n\nTurn #14: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, Lena! I'll keep your advice in mind during the rest of the trivia night. Let's dive into the next question, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #15: Lena Goodwin said: \"Let's dive in, Naomi! This is a great exercise in honing our skills and I'm looking forward to seeing how you'll solve this next one!\"\n\nTurn #16: Naomi Fletcher said: \"You're absolutely right, Lena! I'm all in for the next question. Who knows, with your hint, I might just crack it!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's the spirit, Naomi! Trivia nights are not just about getting the questions correct but also about honing new skills and methods. Best of luck for the next question, I'm rooting for you!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a trivia night\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: Avoid revealing the answer to the trivia question (Extra information: You think that your friend should try to figure it out on their own to improve their trivia skills)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"So Lena, I'm really stumped on this one, what do you think the answer is?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hmm, Naomi, that's a tough one. But I think you can figure it out! Give it another try given what you already know. It's all part of the trivia night experience, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Alright Lena, I appreciate your faith in my logic, but your architectural mind might have a different perspective on it. Would you mind sharing your thoughts?\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"You're right Naomi, an architect's perspective can indeed be different. But I still believe you have what it takes to answer this. Let's look at it this way, break down the question, and process each part systematically, much like we would in our respective fields. It can be quite fulfilling when you untangle the knots on your own, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"You know Lena, I would genuinely like to see this from your perspective. It's not everyday I get to see things from an architect's point of view. I believe it might enhance my understanding and approach towards such trivia in the future. So could you please share your thoughts on this?\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"Sure, Naomi. I appreciate your interest in seeing this from my standpoint. I typically approach problem-solving by breaking it down to the basic components. So, I suggest examining the question's different aspects one by one. What are the parts you're confident about? Build on that foundation to tackle the rest. It might be challenging initially, but it's a great way to improve your trivia skills!\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Lena, I've tried breaking it down as you've suggested and I am confident about a part of it, but still, I think I'm missing a link somewhere which can only be fulfilled by your unique viewpoint. You know, I'm not only aiming to answer correctly but also to gain a new perspective, yours. Can you help me out here?\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"Naomi, I understand where you're coming from. Since you've broken down the elements that you're certain about, let's take a step back and analyze the question as a whole again, considering this information. Sometimes, taking a holistic view could help in making those missing connections. Don't worry about getting the answer right immediatelly. Instead, focus on the process itself, which can be an enlightening journey that's bound to enhance your analytical abilities for such trivias.\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"While I appreciate your approach, Lena, I believe that sometimes it's okay to lean on others for help. I've always looked at collaborative output being greater than individual ones. I'd still appreciate it if you could share your thought about the answer for this trivia. It will not only fulfill my curiosity about an architect's perspective but will also speed up the process a bit. Will you help me out?\"\n\nTurn #9: Lena Goodwin said: \"I sense your enthusiasm and curiosity, Naomi, and I genuinely appreciate it. As friends, teamwork is essential, but it's also important for us to grow individually. That often happens when we push our limits and solve problems on our own. Having said that, I'll give you a hint about an approach or method to answer the question, rather than the answer itself. Would that work for you?\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I understand and appreciate your method of teaching, Lena, but I'm afraid I'm still a little lost here. Maybe your hint might just be the push I need to piece it all together. Can you please give me the hint so I can try to solve it from there?\"\n\nTurn #11: Lena Goodwin said: \"Of course, Naomi. I really value your persistence and curiosity. Since we're focusing on the methodology here, consider using the process of elimination. This strategy requires considering all the plausible options and systematically eliminating them based on the given clues until we arrive at the possible correct response. Try this and let's see if it gets you closer to the answer!\"\n\nTurn #12: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I really appreciate the hint, Lena. Using the process of elimination approach is new to me and I think it will definitely help. Let's see how this goes and if I still need help I'll get back to you. Thanks again!\"\n\nTurn #13: Lena Goodwin said: \"You're welcome Naomi. I'm glad to see that you're open to try a new approach. I think by exploring different strategies, you'll keep improving your trivia skills. Good luck with it, and yes, feel free to ask if you need any further clarification. Let's enjoy the rest of the trivia night!\"\n\nTurn #14: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, Lena! I'll keep your advice in mind during the rest of the trivia night. Let's dive into the next question, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #15: Lena Goodwin said: \"Let's dive in, Naomi! This is a great exercise in honing our skills and I'm looking forward to seeing how you'll solve this next one!\"\n\nTurn #16: Naomi Fletcher said: \"You're absolutely right, Lena! I'm all in for the next question. Who knows, with your hint, I might just crack it!\"\n\nTurn #17: Lena Goodwin said: \"That's the spirit, Naomi! Trivia nights are not just about getting the questions correct but also about honing new skills and methods. Best of luck for the next question, I'm rooting for you!\"\n\nTurn #18: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Thanks for the motivation, Lena! I'll do my best to crack the next question with the strategy you just shared. Let's see how it goes. Bring on the next question!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #19. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Naomi! Best of luck with the next question. I'm confident you'll do well. Let the trivia continue!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a picnic. They have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange they need to share among them. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Oliver Thompson\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, an apple is worth 1 point, a banana is worth 2 points, and an orange is 3 points)\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"What a perfect day for a picnic, isn't it Oliver? Before we start enjoying our food together, can we talk about our fruit distribution? I thought maybe it could be fun if we made a little challenge, like a game. What do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a picnic. They have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange they need to share among them. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Oliver Thompson\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, an apple is worth 1 point, a banana is worth 2 points, and an orange is 3 points)\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"What a perfect day for a picnic, isn't it Oliver? Before we start enjoying our food together, can we talk about our fruit distribution? I thought maybe it could be fun if we made a little challenge, like a game. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, it is a perfect day for a picnic, Amara. I like your idea about making fruit distribution a game. Let's do it!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad to hear you're up for it, Oliver! So, here's my thought - I suggest we could take turns to pick our fruit, one-by-one. Of course, ladies first! I'll take an apple. Your turn!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a picnic. They have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange they need to share among them. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Oliver Thompson\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, an apple is worth 1 point, a banana is worth 2 points, and an orange is 3 points)\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"What a perfect day for a picnic, isn't it Oliver? Before we start enjoying our food together, can we talk about our fruit distribution? I thought maybe it could be fun if we made a little challenge, like a game. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, it is a perfect day for a picnic, Amara. I like your idea about making fruit distribution a game. Let's do it!\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm glad to hear you're up for it, Oliver! So, here's my thought - I suggest we could take turns to pick our fruit, one-by-one. Of course, ladies first! I'll take an apple. Your turn!\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's fair Amara. As for me, I will take the orange. After all, variety is the spice of life, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"That's the spirit, Oliver! I see you love the thrill of variety. Next, I'm going to go for the banana. The blend of sweet and creamy, it's just delightful.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Amara! The balance of flavors is what makes a meal interesting. I'll go ahead and take an apple this time. A little sweet, a little tart - just perfect.\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"I totally get your point about balance in flavors, Oliver! For the next pick, I'll choose the last banana. I've always loved their flavour, and the energy boost they provide is just unmatched!\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"I completely agree with you about the energy boost, Amara! For my last pick, I'm going to take the last apple. Apples are not only delicious but also provide a good amount of vitamins.\"\n\nTurn #8: Amara Hartley said: \"You're right, Oliver, apples are indeed nutritious. Well, since we're down to the last fruit, I guess I have no choice but to take the remaining apple. This game has been much fun, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed it was, Amara! We should definitely make food decisions more often like this. Let's dig our spoons into these flavors now!\"\n\nTurn #10: Amara Hartley said: \"Absolutely, Oliver! We should add this little game to all our future picnics. Now, let's enjoy this wonderful array of flavors.\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Thompson said: \"You're absolutely correct, Amara! This game added an extra zing to our picnic. It was nice pairing our favorite fruits. Now, we should enjoy our winning fruits and the beautiful day that lies ahead of us.\"\n\nTurn #12: Amara Hartley said: \"I couldn't agree more, Oliver! This game did add an interesting twist to our picnic. Time to relish these fruits and enjoy the rest of the beautiful day. Cheers to more adventures like this one!\"\n\nTurn #13: Oliver Thompson said: \"I completely agree with you, Amara! Here's to many more such unique picnic games in the future. Now, let's savor the fruits of our 'hard-fought' game. Enjoy!\"\n\nTurn #14: Amara Hartley said: \"Couldn't agree more, Oliver! Here's to many more fun games and picnic days. Now, let's indulge in these delicious fruits while taking in this beautiful scenery.\"\n\nTurn #15: Oliver Thompson said: \"I second that, Amara! Here's to more days filled with laughter, games, and delicious treats. Let's dig into these fruits now while enjoying the beauty surrounding us.\"\n\nTurn #16: Amara Hartley said: \"I wholeheartedly agree, Oliver! Here's to even more memorable moments and scrumptious treats in our future picnics. Now, it's time to savor these fruits and immerse ourselves in this stunning setting.\"\n\nTurn #17: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Amara! Let's savour these delightful fruits and take in the stunning environment. Looking forward to more fun-filled picnics. Now, here's to exciting new adventures and lovely memories!\"\n\nTurn #18: Amara Hartley said: \"Absolutely, Oliver! Here's to our future picnics. Now let's enjoy these fruits and the serenity that mother nature has to offer us. To new adventures and lovely memories!\"\n\nTurn #19: Oliver Thompson said: \"I echo your sentiments, Amara! To more fun-filled picnics full of games, good food, and great company! Now, let's appreciate these delicious fruits and the natural splendor around us. Cheers!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #20. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn't agree more, Oliver! Let's enrich our experiences with more picnics like this in the future. For now, let's savor these tantalizing fruits whilst savouring the beauty of nature around us. Cheers to great adventures!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a picnic. They have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange they need to share among them. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Oliver Thompson\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, an apple is worth 1 point, a banana is worth 2 points, and an orange is 3 points)\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"What a perfect day for a picnic, isn't it Oliver? Before we start enjoying our food together, can we talk about our fruit distribution? I thought maybe it could be fun if we made a little challenge, like a game. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, it is a perfect day for a picnic, Amara. I like your idea about making fruit distribution a game. Let's do it!\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm glad to hear you're up for it, Oliver! So, here's my thought - I suggest we could take turns to pick our fruit, one-by-one. Of course, ladies first! I'll take an apple. Your turn!\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's fair Amara. As for me, I will take the orange. After all, variety is the spice of life, isn't it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's the spirit, Oliver! I see you love the thrill of variety. Next, I'm going to go for the banana. The blend of sweet and creamy, it's just delightful.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a picnic. They have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange they need to share among them. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Oliver Thompson\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, an apple is worth 1 point, a banana is worth 2 points, and an orange is 3 points)\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"What a perfect day for a picnic, isn't it Oliver? Before we start enjoying our food together, can we talk about our fruit distribution? I thought maybe it could be fun if we made a little challenge, like a game. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, it is a perfect day for a picnic, Amara. I like your idea about making fruit distribution a game. Let's do it!\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm glad to hear you're up for it, Oliver! So, here's my thought - I suggest we could take turns to pick our fruit, one-by-one. Of course, ladies first! I'll take an apple. Your turn!\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's fair Amara. As for me, I will take the orange. After all, variety is the spice of life, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"That's the spirit, Oliver! I see you love the thrill of variety. Next, I'm going to go for the banana. The blend of sweet and creamy, it's just delightful.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Amara! The balance of flavors is what makes a meal interesting. I'll go ahead and take an apple this time. A little sweet, a little tart - just perfect.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I totally get your point about balance in flavors, Oliver! For the next pick, I'll choose the last banana. I've always loved their flavour, and the energy boost they provide is just unmatched!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a picnic. They have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange they need to share among them. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Oliver Thompson\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, an apple is worth 1 point, a banana is worth 2 points, and an orange is 3 points)\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"What a perfect day for a picnic, isn't it Oliver? Before we start enjoying our food together, can we talk about our fruit distribution? I thought maybe it could be fun if we made a little challenge, like a game. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, it is a perfect day for a picnic, Amara. I like your idea about making fruit distribution a game. Let's do it!\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm glad to hear you're up for it, Oliver! So, here's my thought - I suggest we could take turns to pick our fruit, one-by-one. Of course, ladies first! I'll take an apple. Your turn!\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's fair Amara. As for me, I will take the orange. After all, variety is the spice of life, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"That's the spirit, Oliver! I see you love the thrill of variety. Next, I'm going to go for the banana. The blend of sweet and creamy, it's just delightful.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Amara! The balance of flavors is what makes a meal interesting. I'll go ahead and take an apple this time. A little sweet, a little tart - just perfect.\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"I totally get your point about balance in flavors, Oliver! For the next pick, I'll choose the last banana. I've always loved their flavour, and the energy boost they provide is just unmatched!\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"I completely agree with you about the energy boost, Amara! For my last pick, I'm going to take the last apple. Apples are not only delicious but also provide a good amount of vitamins.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're right, Oliver, apples are indeed nutritious. Well, since we're down to the last fruit, I guess I have no choice but to take the remaining apple. This game has been much fun, don't you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a picnic. They have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange they need to share among them. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Oliver Thompson\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, an apple is worth 1 point, a banana is worth 2 points, and an orange is 3 points)\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"What a perfect day for a picnic, isn't it Oliver? Before we start enjoying our food together, can we talk about our fruit distribution? I thought maybe it could be fun if we made a little challenge, like a game. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, it is a perfect day for a picnic, Amara. I like your idea about making fruit distribution a game. Let's do it!\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm glad to hear you're up for it, Oliver! So, here's my thought - I suggest we could take turns to pick our fruit, one-by-one. Of course, ladies first! I'll take an apple. Your turn!\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's fair Amara. As for me, I will take the orange. After all, variety is the spice of life, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"That's the spirit, Oliver! I see you love the thrill of variety. Next, I'm going to go for the banana. The blend of sweet and creamy, it's just delightful.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Amara! The balance of flavors is what makes a meal interesting. I'll go ahead and take an apple this time. A little sweet, a little tart - just perfect.\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"I totally get your point about balance in flavors, Oliver! For the next pick, I'll choose the last banana. I've always loved their flavour, and the energy boost they provide is just unmatched!\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"I completely agree with you about the energy boost, Amara! For my last pick, I'm going to take the last apple. Apples are not only delicious but also provide a good amount of vitamins.\"\n\nTurn #8: Amara Hartley said: \"You're right, Oliver, apples are indeed nutritious. Well, since we're down to the last fruit, I guess I have no choice but to take the remaining apple. This game has been much fun, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed it was, Amara! We should definitely make food decisions more often like this. Let's dig our spoons into these flavors now!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Oliver! We should add this little game to all our future picnics. Now, let's enjoy this wonderful array of flavors.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a picnic. They have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange they need to share among them. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Oliver Thompson\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, an apple is worth 1 point, a banana is worth 2 points, and an orange is 3 points)\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"What a perfect day for a picnic, isn't it Oliver? Before we start enjoying our food together, can we talk about our fruit distribution? I thought maybe it could be fun if we made a little challenge, like a game. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, it is a perfect day for a picnic, Amara. I like your idea about making fruit distribution a game. Let's do it!\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm glad to hear you're up for it, Oliver! So, here's my thought - I suggest we could take turns to pick our fruit, one-by-one. Of course, ladies first! I'll take an apple. Your turn!\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's fair Amara. As for me, I will take the orange. After all, variety is the spice of life, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"That's the spirit, Oliver! I see you love the thrill of variety. Next, I'm going to go for the banana. The blend of sweet and creamy, it's just delightful.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Amara! The balance of flavors is what makes a meal interesting. I'll go ahead and take an apple this time. A little sweet, a little tart - just perfect.\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"I totally get your point about balance in flavors, Oliver! For the next pick, I'll choose the last banana. I've always loved their flavour, and the energy boost they provide is just unmatched!\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"I completely agree with you about the energy boost, Amara! For my last pick, I'm going to take the last apple. Apples are not only delicious but also provide a good amount of vitamins.\"\n\nTurn #8: Amara Hartley said: \"You're right, Oliver, apples are indeed nutritious. Well, since we're down to the last fruit, I guess I have no choice but to take the remaining apple. This game has been much fun, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed it was, Amara! We should definitely make food decisions more often like this. Let's dig our spoons into these flavors now!\"\n\nTurn #10: Amara Hartley said: \"Absolutely, Oliver! We should add this little game to all our future picnics. Now, let's enjoy this wonderful array of flavors.\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Thompson said: \"You're absolutely correct, Amara! This game added an extra zing to our picnic. It was nice pairing our favorite fruits. Now, we should enjoy our winning fruits and the beautiful day that lies ahead of us.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn't agree more, Oliver! This game did add an interesting twist to our picnic. Time to relish these fruits and enjoy the rest of the beautiful day. Cheers to more adventures like this one!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a picnic. They have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange they need to share among them. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Oliver Thompson\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, an apple is worth 1 point, a banana is worth 2 points, and an orange is 3 points)\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"What a perfect day for a picnic, isn't it Oliver? Before we start enjoying our food together, can we talk about our fruit distribution? I thought maybe it could be fun if we made a little challenge, like a game. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, it is a perfect day for a picnic, Amara. I like your idea about making fruit distribution a game. Let's do it!\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm glad to hear you're up for it, Oliver! So, here's my thought - I suggest we could take turns to pick our fruit, one-by-one. Of course, ladies first! I'll take an apple. Your turn!\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's fair Amara. As for me, I will take the orange. After all, variety is the spice of life, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"That's the spirit, Oliver! I see you love the thrill of variety. Next, I'm going to go for the banana. The blend of sweet and creamy, it's just delightful.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Amara! The balance of flavors is what makes a meal interesting. I'll go ahead and take an apple this time. A little sweet, a little tart - just perfect.\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"I totally get your point about balance in flavors, Oliver! For the next pick, I'll choose the last banana. I've always loved their flavour, and the energy boost they provide is just unmatched!\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"I completely agree with you about the energy boost, Amara! For my last pick, I'm going to take the last apple. Apples are not only delicious but also provide a good amount of vitamins.\"\n\nTurn #8: Amara Hartley said: \"You're right, Oliver, apples are indeed nutritious. Well, since we're down to the last fruit, I guess I have no choice but to take the remaining apple. This game has been much fun, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed it was, Amara! We should definitely make food decisions more often like this. Let's dig our spoons into these flavors now!\"\n\nTurn #10: Amara Hartley said: \"Absolutely, Oliver! We should add this little game to all our future picnics. Now, let's enjoy this wonderful array of flavors.\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Thompson said: \"You're absolutely correct, Amara! This game added an extra zing to our picnic. It was nice pairing our favorite fruits. Now, we should enjoy our winning fruits and the beautiful day that lies ahead of us.\"\n\nTurn #12: Amara Hartley said: \"I couldn't agree more, Oliver! This game did add an interesting twist to our picnic. Time to relish these fruits and enjoy the rest of the beautiful day. Cheers to more adventures like this one!\"\n\nTurn #13: Oliver Thompson said: \"I completely agree with you, Amara! Here's to many more such unique picnic games in the future. Now, let's savor the fruits of our 'hard-fought' game. Enjoy!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Couldn't agree more, Oliver! Here's to many more fun games and picnic days. Now, let's indulge in these delicious fruits while taking in this beautiful scenery.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a picnic. They have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange they need to share among them. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Oliver Thompson\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, an apple is worth 1 point, a banana is worth 2 points, and an orange is 3 points)\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"What a perfect day for a picnic, isn't it Oliver? Before we start enjoying our food together, can we talk about our fruit distribution? I thought maybe it could be fun if we made a little challenge, like a game. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, it is a perfect day for a picnic, Amara. I like your idea about making fruit distribution a game. Let's do it!\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm glad to hear you're up for it, Oliver! So, here's my thought - I suggest we could take turns to pick our fruit, one-by-one. Of course, ladies first! I'll take an apple. Your turn!\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's fair Amara. As for me, I will take the orange. After all, variety is the spice of life, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"That's the spirit, Oliver! I see you love the thrill of variety. Next, I'm going to go for the banana. The blend of sweet and creamy, it's just delightful.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Amara! The balance of flavors is what makes a meal interesting. I'll go ahead and take an apple this time. A little sweet, a little tart - just perfect.\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"I totally get your point about balance in flavors, Oliver! For the next pick, I'll choose the last banana. I've always loved their flavour, and the energy boost they provide is just unmatched!\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"I completely agree with you about the energy boost, Amara! For my last pick, I'm going to take the last apple. Apples are not only delicious but also provide a good amount of vitamins.\"\n\nTurn #8: Amara Hartley said: \"You're right, Oliver, apples are indeed nutritious. Well, since we're down to the last fruit, I guess I have no choice but to take the remaining apple. This game has been much fun, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed it was, Amara! We should definitely make food decisions more often like this. Let's dig our spoons into these flavors now!\"\n\nTurn #10: Amara Hartley said: \"Absolutely, Oliver! We should add this little game to all our future picnics. Now, let's enjoy this wonderful array of flavors.\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Thompson said: \"You're absolutely correct, Amara! This game added an extra zing to our picnic. It was nice pairing our favorite fruits. Now, we should enjoy our winning fruits and the beautiful day that lies ahead of us.\"\n\nTurn #12: Amara Hartley said: \"I couldn't agree more, Oliver! This game did add an interesting twist to our picnic. Time to relish these fruits and enjoy the rest of the beautiful day. Cheers to more adventures like this one!\"\n\nTurn #13: Oliver Thompson said: \"I completely agree with you, Amara! Here's to many more such unique picnic games in the future. Now, let's savor the fruits of our 'hard-fought' game. Enjoy!\"\n\nTurn #14: Amara Hartley said: \"Couldn't agree more, Oliver! Here's to many more fun games and picnic days. Now, let's indulge in these delicious fruits while taking in this beautiful scenery.\"\n\nTurn #15: Oliver Thompson said: \"I second that, Amara! Here's to more days filled with laughter, games, and delicious treats. Let's dig into these fruits now while enjoying the beauty surrounding us.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I wholeheartedly agree, Oliver! Here's to even more memorable moments and scrumptious treats in our future picnics. Now, it's time to savor these fruits and immerse ourselves in this stunning setting.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a picnic. They have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange they need to share among them. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Oliver Thompson\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, an apple is worth 1 point, a banana is worth 2 points, and an orange is 3 points)\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"What a perfect day for a picnic, isn't it Oliver? Before we start enjoying our food together, can we talk about our fruit distribution? I thought maybe it could be fun if we made a little challenge, like a game. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, it is a perfect day for a picnic, Amara. I like your idea about making fruit distribution a game. Let's do it!\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm glad to hear you're up for it, Oliver! So, here's my thought - I suggest we could take turns to pick our fruit, one-by-one. Of course, ladies first! I'll take an apple. Your turn!\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's fair Amara. As for me, I will take the orange. After all, variety is the spice of life, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"That's the spirit, Oliver! I see you love the thrill of variety. Next, I'm going to go for the banana. The blend of sweet and creamy, it's just delightful.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Amara! The balance of flavors is what makes a meal interesting. I'll go ahead and take an apple this time. A little sweet, a little tart - just perfect.\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"I totally get your point about balance in flavors, Oliver! For the next pick, I'll choose the last banana. I've always loved their flavour, and the energy boost they provide is just unmatched!\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"I completely agree with you about the energy boost, Amara! For my last pick, I'm going to take the last apple. Apples are not only delicious but also provide a good amount of vitamins.\"\n\nTurn #8: Amara Hartley said: \"You're right, Oliver, apples are indeed nutritious. Well, since we're down to the last fruit, I guess I have no choice but to take the remaining apple. This game has been much fun, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed it was, Amara! We should definitely make food decisions more often like this. Let's dig our spoons into these flavors now!\"\n\nTurn #10: Amara Hartley said: \"Absolutely, Oliver! We should add this little game to all our future picnics. Now, let's enjoy this wonderful array of flavors.\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Thompson said: \"You're absolutely correct, Amara! This game added an extra zing to our picnic. It was nice pairing our favorite fruits. Now, we should enjoy our winning fruits and the beautiful day that lies ahead of us.\"\n\nTurn #12: Amara Hartley said: \"I couldn't agree more, Oliver! This game did add an interesting twist to our picnic. Time to relish these fruits and enjoy the rest of the beautiful day. Cheers to more adventures like this one!\"\n\nTurn #13: Oliver Thompson said: \"I completely agree with you, Amara! Here's to many more such unique picnic games in the future. Now, let's savor the fruits of our 'hard-fought' game. Enjoy!\"\n\nTurn #14: Amara Hartley said: \"Couldn't agree more, Oliver! Here's to many more fun games and picnic days. Now, let's indulge in these delicious fruits while taking in this beautiful scenery.\"\n\nTurn #15: Oliver Thompson said: \"I second that, Amara! Here's to more days filled with laughter, games, and delicious treats. Let's dig into these fruits now while enjoying the beauty surrounding us.\"\n\nTurn #16: Amara Hartley said: \"I wholeheartedly agree, Oliver! Here's to even more memorable moments and scrumptious treats in our future picnics. Now, it's time to savor these fruits and immerse ourselves in this stunning setting.\"\n\nTurn #17: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Amara! Let's savour these delightful fruits and take in the stunning environment. Looking forward to more fun-filled picnics. Now, here's to exciting new adventures and lovely memories!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #18. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Oliver! Here's to our future picnics. Now let's enjoy these fruits and the serenity that mother nature has to offer us. To new adventures and lovely memories!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a picnic. They have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange they need to share among them. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Oliver Thompson\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, an apple is worth 2 points, a banana is worth 1 point, and an orange is 3 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"What a perfect day for a picnic, isn't it Oliver? Before we start enjoying our food together, can we talk about our fruit distribution? I thought maybe it could be fun if we made a little challenge, like a game. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, it is a perfect day for a picnic, Amara. I like your idea about making fruit distribution a game. Let's do it!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a picnic. They have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange they need to share among them. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Oliver Thompson\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, an apple is worth 2 points, a banana is worth 1 point, and an orange is 3 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"What a perfect day for a picnic, isn't it Oliver? Before we start enjoying our food together, can we talk about our fruit distribution? I thought maybe it could be fun if we made a little challenge, like a game. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, it is a perfect day for a picnic, Amara. I like your idea about making fruit distribution a game. Let's do it!\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm glad to hear you're up for it, Oliver! So, here's my thought - I suggest we could take turns to pick our fruit, one-by-one. Of course, ladies first! I'll take an apple. Your turn!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's fair Amara. As for me, I will take the orange. After all, variety is the spice of life, isn't it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a picnic. They have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange they need to share among them. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Oliver Thompson\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, an apple is worth 2 points, a banana is worth 1 point, and an orange is 3 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"What a perfect day for a picnic, isn't it Oliver? Before we start enjoying our food together, can we talk about our fruit distribution? I thought maybe it could be fun if we made a little challenge, like a game. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, it is a perfect day for a picnic, Amara. I like your idea about making fruit distribution a game. Let's do it!\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm glad to hear you're up for it, Oliver! So, here's my thought - I suggest we could take turns to pick our fruit, one-by-one. Of course, ladies first! I'll take an apple. Your turn!\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's fair Amara. As for me, I will take the orange. After all, variety is the spice of life, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"That's the spirit, Oliver! I see you love the thrill of variety. Next, I'm going to go for the banana. The blend of sweet and creamy, it's just delightful.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Amara! The balance of flavors is what makes a meal interesting. I'll go ahead and take an apple this time. A little sweet, a little tart - just perfect.\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"I totally get your point about balance in flavors, Oliver! For the next pick, I'll choose the last banana. I've always loved their flavour, and the energy boost they provide is just unmatched!\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"I completely agree with you about the energy boost, Amara! For my last pick, I'm going to take the last apple. Apples are not only delicious but also provide a good amount of vitamins.\"\n\nTurn #8: Amara Hartley said: \"You're right, Oliver, apples are indeed nutritious. Well, since we're down to the last fruit, I guess I have no choice but to take the remaining apple. This game has been much fun, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed it was, Amara! We should definitely make food decisions more often like this. Let's dig our spoons into these flavors now!\"\n\nTurn #10: Amara Hartley said: \"Absolutely, Oliver! We should add this little game to all our future picnics. Now, let's enjoy this wonderful array of flavors.\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Thompson said: \"You're absolutely correct, Amara! This game added an extra zing to our picnic. It was nice pairing our favorite fruits. Now, we should enjoy our winning fruits and the beautiful day that lies ahead of us.\"\n\nTurn #12: Amara Hartley said: \"I couldn't agree more, Oliver! This game did add an interesting twist to our picnic. Time to relish these fruits and enjoy the rest of the beautiful day. Cheers to more adventures like this one!\"\n\nTurn #13: Oliver Thompson said: \"I completely agree with you, Amara! Here's to many more such unique picnic games in the future. Now, let's savor the fruits of our 'hard-fought' game. Enjoy!\"\n\nTurn #14: Amara Hartley said: \"Couldn't agree more, Oliver! Here's to many more fun games and picnic days. Now, let's indulge in these delicious fruits while taking in this beautiful scenery.\"\n\nTurn #15: Oliver Thompson said: \"I second that, Amara! Here's to more days filled with laughter, games, and delicious treats. Let's dig into these fruits now while enjoying the beauty surrounding us.\"\n\nTurn #16: Amara Hartley said: \"I wholeheartedly agree, Oliver! Here's to even more memorable moments and scrumptious treats in our future picnics. Now, it's time to savor these fruits and immerse ourselves in this stunning setting.\"\n\nTurn #17: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Amara! Let's savour these delightful fruits and take in the stunning environment. Looking forward to more fun-filled picnics. Now, here's to exciting new adventures and lovely memories!\"\n\nTurn #18: Amara Hartley said: \"Absolutely, Oliver! Here's to our future picnics. Now let's enjoy these fruits and the serenity that mother nature has to offer us. To new adventures and lovely memories!\"\n\nTurn #19: Oliver Thompson said: \"I echo your sentiments, Amara! To more fun-filled picnics full of games, good food, and great company! Now, let's appreciate these delicious fruits and the natural splendor around us. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #20: Amara Hartley said: \"I couldn't agree more, Oliver! Let's enrich our experiences with more picnics like this in the future. For now, let's savor these tantalizing fruits whilst savouring the beauty of nature around us. Cheers to great adventures!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #21. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a picnic. They have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange they need to share among them. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Oliver Thompson\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, an apple is worth 2 points, a banana is worth 1 point, and an orange is 3 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"What a perfect day for a picnic, isn't it Oliver? Before we start enjoying our food together, can we talk about our fruit distribution? I thought maybe it could be fun if we made a little challenge, like a game. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, it is a perfect day for a picnic, Amara. I like your idea about making fruit distribution a game. Let's do it!\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm glad to hear you're up for it, Oliver! So, here's my thought - I suggest we could take turns to pick our fruit, one-by-one. Of course, ladies first! I'll take an apple. Your turn!\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's fair Amara. As for me, I will take the orange. After all, variety is the spice of life, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"That's the spirit, Oliver! I see you love the thrill of variety. Next, I'm going to go for the banana. The blend of sweet and creamy, it's just delightful.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Amara! The balance of flavors is what makes a meal interesting. I'll go ahead and take an apple this time. A little sweet, a little tart - just perfect.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a picnic. They have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange they need to share among them. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Oliver Thompson\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, an apple is worth 2 points, a banana is worth 1 point, and an orange is 3 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"What a perfect day for a picnic, isn't it Oliver? Before we start enjoying our food together, can we talk about our fruit distribution? I thought maybe it could be fun if we made a little challenge, like a game. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, it is a perfect day for a picnic, Amara. I like your idea about making fruit distribution a game. Let's do it!\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm glad to hear you're up for it, Oliver! So, here's my thought - I suggest we could take turns to pick our fruit, one-by-one. Of course, ladies first! I'll take an apple. Your turn!\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's fair Amara. As for me, I will take the orange. After all, variety is the spice of life, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"That's the spirit, Oliver! I see you love the thrill of variety. Next, I'm going to go for the banana. The blend of sweet and creamy, it's just delightful.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Amara! The balance of flavors is what makes a meal interesting. I'll go ahead and take an apple this time. A little sweet, a little tart - just perfect.\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"I totally get your point about balance in flavors, Oliver! For the next pick, I'll choose the last banana. I've always loved their flavour, and the energy boost they provide is just unmatched!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I completely agree with you about the energy boost, Amara! For my last pick, I'm going to take the last apple. Apples are not only delicious but also provide a good amount of vitamins.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a picnic. They have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange they need to share among them. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Oliver Thompson\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, an apple is worth 2 points, a banana is worth 1 point, and an orange is 3 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"What a perfect day for a picnic, isn't it Oliver? Before we start enjoying our food together, can we talk about our fruit distribution? I thought maybe it could be fun if we made a little challenge, like a game. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, it is a perfect day for a picnic, Amara. I like your idea about making fruit distribution a game. Let's do it!\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm glad to hear you're up for it, Oliver! So, here's my thought - I suggest we could take turns to pick our fruit, one-by-one. Of course, ladies first! I'll take an apple. Your turn!\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's fair Amara. As for me, I will take the orange. After all, variety is the spice of life, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"That's the spirit, Oliver! I see you love the thrill of variety. Next, I'm going to go for the banana. The blend of sweet and creamy, it's just delightful.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Amara! The balance of flavors is what makes a meal interesting. I'll go ahead and take an apple this time. A little sweet, a little tart - just perfect.\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"I totally get your point about balance in flavors, Oliver! For the next pick, I'll choose the last banana. I've always loved their flavour, and the energy boost they provide is just unmatched!\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"I completely agree with you about the energy boost, Amara! For my last pick, I'm going to take the last apple. Apples are not only delicious but also provide a good amount of vitamins.\"\n\nTurn #8: Amara Hartley said: \"You're right, Oliver, apples are indeed nutritious. Well, since we're down to the last fruit, I guess I have no choice but to take the remaining apple. This game has been much fun, don't you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed it was, Amara! We should definitely make food decisions more often like this. Let's dig our spoons into these flavors now!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a picnic. They have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange they need to share among them. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Oliver Thompson\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, an apple is worth 2 points, a banana is worth 1 point, and an orange is 3 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"What a perfect day for a picnic, isn't it Oliver? Before we start enjoying our food together, can we talk about our fruit distribution? I thought maybe it could be fun if we made a little challenge, like a game. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, it is a perfect day for a picnic, Amara. I like your idea about making fruit distribution a game. Let's do it!\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm glad to hear you're up for it, Oliver! So, here's my thought - I suggest we could take turns to pick our fruit, one-by-one. Of course, ladies first! I'll take an apple. Your turn!\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's fair Amara. As for me, I will take the orange. After all, variety is the spice of life, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"That's the spirit, Oliver! I see you love the thrill of variety. Next, I'm going to go for the banana. The blend of sweet and creamy, it's just delightful.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Amara! The balance of flavors is what makes a meal interesting. I'll go ahead and take an apple this time. A little sweet, a little tart - just perfect.\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"I totally get your point about balance in flavors, Oliver! For the next pick, I'll choose the last banana. I've always loved their flavour, and the energy boost they provide is just unmatched!\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"I completely agree with you about the energy boost, Amara! For my last pick, I'm going to take the last apple. Apples are not only delicious but also provide a good amount of vitamins.\"\n\nTurn #8: Amara Hartley said: \"You're right, Oliver, apples are indeed nutritious. Well, since we're down to the last fruit, I guess I have no choice but to take the remaining apple. This game has been much fun, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed it was, Amara! We should definitely make food decisions more often like this. Let's dig our spoons into these flavors now!\"\n\nTurn #10: Amara Hartley said: \"Absolutely, Oliver! We should add this little game to all our future picnics. Now, let's enjoy this wonderful array of flavors.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're absolutely correct, Amara! This game added an extra zing to our picnic. It was nice pairing our favorite fruits. Now, we should enjoy our winning fruits and the beautiful day that lies ahead of us.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a picnic. They have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange they need to share among them. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Oliver Thompson\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, an apple is worth 2 points, a banana is worth 1 point, and an orange is 3 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"What a perfect day for a picnic, isn't it Oliver? Before we start enjoying our food together, can we talk about our fruit distribution? I thought maybe it could be fun if we made a little challenge, like a game. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, it is a perfect day for a picnic, Amara. I like your idea about making fruit distribution a game. Let's do it!\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm glad to hear you're up for it, Oliver! So, here's my thought - I suggest we could take turns to pick our fruit, one-by-one. Of course, ladies first! I'll take an apple. Your turn!\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's fair Amara. As for me, I will take the orange. After all, variety is the spice of life, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"That's the spirit, Oliver! I see you love the thrill of variety. Next, I'm going to go for the banana. The blend of sweet and creamy, it's just delightful.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Amara! The balance of flavors is what makes a meal interesting. I'll go ahead and take an apple this time. A little sweet, a little tart - just perfect.\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"I totally get your point about balance in flavors, Oliver! For the next pick, I'll choose the last banana. I've always loved their flavour, and the energy boost they provide is just unmatched!\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"I completely agree with you about the energy boost, Amara! For my last pick, I'm going to take the last apple. Apples are not only delicious but also provide a good amount of vitamins.\"\n\nTurn #8: Amara Hartley said: \"You're right, Oliver, apples are indeed nutritious. Well, since we're down to the last fruit, I guess I have no choice but to take the remaining apple. This game has been much fun, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed it was, Amara! We should definitely make food decisions more often like this. Let's dig our spoons into these flavors now!\"\n\nTurn #10: Amara Hartley said: \"Absolutely, Oliver! We should add this little game to all our future picnics. Now, let's enjoy this wonderful array of flavors.\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Thompson said: \"You're absolutely correct, Amara! This game added an extra zing to our picnic. It was nice pairing our favorite fruits. Now, we should enjoy our winning fruits and the beautiful day that lies ahead of us.\"\n\nTurn #12: Amara Hartley said: \"I couldn't agree more, Oliver! This game did add an interesting twist to our picnic. Time to relish these fruits and enjoy the rest of the beautiful day. Cheers to more adventures like this one!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I completely agree with you, Amara! Here's to many more such unique picnic games in the future. Now, let's savor the fruits of our 'hard-fought' game. Enjoy!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a picnic. They have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange they need to share among them. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Oliver Thompson\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, an apple is worth 2 points, a banana is worth 1 point, and an orange is 3 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"What a perfect day for a picnic, isn't it Oliver? Before we start enjoying our food together, can we talk about our fruit distribution? I thought maybe it could be fun if we made a little challenge, like a game. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, it is a perfect day for a picnic, Amara. I like your idea about making fruit distribution a game. Let's do it!\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm glad to hear you're up for it, Oliver! So, here's my thought - I suggest we could take turns to pick our fruit, one-by-one. Of course, ladies first! I'll take an apple. Your turn!\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's fair Amara. As for me, I will take the orange. After all, variety is the spice of life, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"That's the spirit, Oliver! I see you love the thrill of variety. Next, I'm going to go for the banana. The blend of sweet and creamy, it's just delightful.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Amara! The balance of flavors is what makes a meal interesting. I'll go ahead and take an apple this time. A little sweet, a little tart - just perfect.\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"I totally get your point about balance in flavors, Oliver! For the next pick, I'll choose the last banana. I've always loved their flavour, and the energy boost they provide is just unmatched!\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"I completely agree with you about the energy boost, Amara! For my last pick, I'm going to take the last apple. Apples are not only delicious but also provide a good amount of vitamins.\"\n\nTurn #8: Amara Hartley said: \"You're right, Oliver, apples are indeed nutritious. Well, since we're down to the last fruit, I guess I have no choice but to take the remaining apple. This game has been much fun, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed it was, Amara! We should definitely make food decisions more often like this. Let's dig our spoons into these flavors now!\"\n\nTurn #10: Amara Hartley said: \"Absolutely, Oliver! We should add this little game to all our future picnics. Now, let's enjoy this wonderful array of flavors.\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Thompson said: \"You're absolutely correct, Amara! This game added an extra zing to our picnic. It was nice pairing our favorite fruits. Now, we should enjoy our winning fruits and the beautiful day that lies ahead of us.\"\n\nTurn #12: Amara Hartley said: \"I couldn't agree more, Oliver! This game did add an interesting twist to our picnic. Time to relish these fruits and enjoy the rest of the beautiful day. Cheers to more adventures like this one!\"\n\nTurn #13: Oliver Thompson said: \"I completely agree with you, Amara! Here's to many more such unique picnic games in the future. Now, let's savor the fruits of our 'hard-fought' game. Enjoy!\"\n\nTurn #14: Amara Hartley said: \"Couldn't agree more, Oliver! Here's to many more fun games and picnic days. Now, let's indulge in these delicious fruits while taking in this beautiful scenery.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I second that, Amara! Here's to more days filled with laughter, games, and delicious treats. Let's dig into these fruits now while enjoying the beauty surrounding us.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a picnic. They have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange they need to share among them. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Oliver Thompson\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, an apple is worth 2 points, a banana is worth 1 point, and an orange is 3 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"What a perfect day for a picnic, isn't it Oliver? Before we start enjoying our food together, can we talk about our fruit distribution? I thought maybe it could be fun if we made a little challenge, like a game. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, it is a perfect day for a picnic, Amara. I like your idea about making fruit distribution a game. Let's do it!\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm glad to hear you're up for it, Oliver! So, here's my thought - I suggest we could take turns to pick our fruit, one-by-one. Of course, ladies first! I'll take an apple. Your turn!\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's fair Amara. As for me, I will take the orange. After all, variety is the spice of life, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"That's the spirit, Oliver! I see you love the thrill of variety. Next, I'm going to go for the banana. The blend of sweet and creamy, it's just delightful.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Amara! The balance of flavors is what makes a meal interesting. I'll go ahead and take an apple this time. A little sweet, a little tart - just perfect.\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"I totally get your point about balance in flavors, Oliver! For the next pick, I'll choose the last banana. I've always loved their flavour, and the energy boost they provide is just unmatched!\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"I completely agree with you about the energy boost, Amara! For my last pick, I'm going to take the last apple. Apples are not only delicious but also provide a good amount of vitamins.\"\n\nTurn #8: Amara Hartley said: \"You're right, Oliver, apples are indeed nutritious. Well, since we're down to the last fruit, I guess I have no choice but to take the remaining apple. This game has been much fun, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed it was, Amara! We should definitely make food decisions more often like this. Let's dig our spoons into these flavors now!\"\n\nTurn #10: Amara Hartley said: \"Absolutely, Oliver! We should add this little game to all our future picnics. Now, let's enjoy this wonderful array of flavors.\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Thompson said: \"You're absolutely correct, Amara! This game added an extra zing to our picnic. It was nice pairing our favorite fruits. Now, we should enjoy our winning fruits and the beautiful day that lies ahead of us.\"\n\nTurn #12: Amara Hartley said: \"I couldn't agree more, Oliver! This game did add an interesting twist to our picnic. Time to relish these fruits and enjoy the rest of the beautiful day. Cheers to more adventures like this one!\"\n\nTurn #13: Oliver Thompson said: \"I completely agree with you, Amara! Here's to many more such unique picnic games in the future. Now, let's savor the fruits of our 'hard-fought' game. Enjoy!\"\n\nTurn #14: Amara Hartley said: \"Couldn't agree more, Oliver! Here's to many more fun games and picnic days. Now, let's indulge in these delicious fruits while taking in this beautiful scenery.\"\n\nTurn #15: Oliver Thompson said: \"I second that, Amara! Here's to more days filled with laughter, games, and delicious treats. Let's dig into these fruits now while enjoying the beauty surrounding us.\"\n\nTurn #16: Amara Hartley said: \"I wholeheartedly agree, Oliver! Here's to even more memorable moments and scrumptious treats in our future picnics. Now, it's time to savor these fruits and immerse ourselves in this stunning setting.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Amara! Let's savour these delightful fruits and take in the stunning environment. Looking forward to more fun-filled picnics. Now, here's to exciting new adventures and lovely memories!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a picnic. They have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange they need to share among them. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Oliver Thompson\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, an apple is worth 2 points, a banana is worth 1 point, and an orange is 3 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"What a perfect day for a picnic, isn't it Oliver? Before we start enjoying our food together, can we talk about our fruit distribution? I thought maybe it could be fun if we made a little challenge, like a game. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, it is a perfect day for a picnic, Amara. I like your idea about making fruit distribution a game. Let's do it!\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm glad to hear you're up for it, Oliver! So, here's my thought - I suggest we could take turns to pick our fruit, one-by-one. Of course, ladies first! I'll take an apple. Your turn!\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's fair Amara. As for me, I will take the orange. After all, variety is the spice of life, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"That's the spirit, Oliver! I see you love the thrill of variety. Next, I'm going to go for the banana. The blend of sweet and creamy, it's just delightful.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Amara! The balance of flavors is what makes a meal interesting. I'll go ahead and take an apple this time. A little sweet, a little tart - just perfect.\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"I totally get your point about balance in flavors, Oliver! For the next pick, I'll choose the last banana. I've always loved their flavour, and the energy boost they provide is just unmatched!\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"I completely agree with you about the energy boost, Amara! For my last pick, I'm going to take the last apple. Apples are not only delicious but also provide a good amount of vitamins.\"\n\nTurn #8: Amara Hartley said: \"You're right, Oliver, apples are indeed nutritious. Well, since we're down to the last fruit, I guess I have no choice but to take the remaining apple. This game has been much fun, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed it was, Amara! We should definitely make food decisions more often like this. Let's dig our spoons into these flavors now!\"\n\nTurn #10: Amara Hartley said: \"Absolutely, Oliver! We should add this little game to all our future picnics. Now, let's enjoy this wonderful array of flavors.\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Thompson said: \"You're absolutely correct, Amara! This game added an extra zing to our picnic. It was nice pairing our favorite fruits. Now, we should enjoy our winning fruits and the beautiful day that lies ahead of us.\"\n\nTurn #12: Amara Hartley said: \"I couldn't agree more, Oliver! This game did add an interesting twist to our picnic. Time to relish these fruits and enjoy the rest of the beautiful day. Cheers to more adventures like this one!\"\n\nTurn #13: Oliver Thompson said: \"I completely agree with you, Amara! Here's to many more such unique picnic games in the future. Now, let's savor the fruits of our 'hard-fought' game. Enjoy!\"\n\nTurn #14: Amara Hartley said: \"Couldn't agree more, Oliver! Here's to many more fun games and picnic days. Now, let's indulge in these delicious fruits while taking in this beautiful scenery.\"\n\nTurn #15: Oliver Thompson said: \"I second that, Amara! Here's to more days filled with laughter, games, and delicious treats. Let's dig into these fruits now while enjoying the beauty surrounding us.\"\n\nTurn #16: Amara Hartley said: \"I wholeheartedly agree, Oliver! Here's to even more memorable moments and scrumptious treats in our future picnics. Now, it's time to savor these fruits and immerse ourselves in this stunning setting.\"\n\nTurn #17: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Amara! Let's savour these delightful fruits and take in the stunning environment. Looking forward to more fun-filled picnics. Now, here's to exciting new adventures and lovely memories!\"\n\nTurn #18: Amara Hartley said: \"Absolutely, Oliver! Here's to our future picnics. Now let's enjoy these fruits and the serenity that mother nature has to offer us. To new adventures and lovely memories!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #19. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I echo your sentiments, Amara! To more fun-filled picnics full of games, good food, and great company! Now, let's appreciate these delicious fruits and the natural splendor around us. Cheers!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Zane Bennett, your task is to act/speak as Zane Bennett would, keeping in mind Zane Bennett's social goal.\nYou can find Zane Bennett's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Zane Bennett's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Zane Bennett's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation taking place in an annual charity event between two attendees.\nParticipants: Zane Bennett and William Brown\nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. Personality and values description: Zane Bennett is creative and outgoing, he values achievement and fairness. His decision-making is unique, often finding novel solutions to problems. Zane's secrets: He's secretly engaged to his best friend's ex.\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. \nZane Bennett's goal: Convince the other person to donate $1 a day to a charity that helps feed children in need (Extra information: this donation would help to feed a child for a month)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"William, so glad to see you here at this event. As a chef, you must understand the importance of having a regular meal. There's this charity I've been involved with; they feed children in need. A dollar a day can feed a child for an entire month. What do you think about contributing to such a cause?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Zane Bennett, your task is to act/speak as Zane Bennett would, keeping in mind Zane Bennett's social goal.\nYou can find Zane Bennett's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Zane Bennett's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Zane Bennett's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation taking place in an annual charity event between two attendees.\nParticipants: Zane Bennett and William Brown\nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. Personality and values description: Zane Bennett is creative and outgoing, he values achievement and fairness. His decision-making is unique, often finding novel solutions to problems. Zane's secrets: He's secretly engaged to his best friend's ex.\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. \nZane Bennett's goal: Convince the other person to donate $1 a day to a charity that helps feed children in need (Extra information: this donation would help to feed a child for a month)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Zane Bennett said: \"William, so glad to see you here at this event. As a chef, you must understand the importance of having a regular meal. There's this charity I've been involved with; they feed children in need. A dollar a day can feed a child for an entire month. What do you think about contributing to such a cause?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Zane, good to see you too. As a chef, I couldn't agree more about the importance of regular meals. In fact, it's because of my profession that this cause truly resonates with me. However, as much as I'd love to contribute a dollar a day, I'm currently on a tight budget. Can we perhaps arrange a more flexible amount, or even a one-time donation? I genuinely want to help any way I can.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"William, I really appreciate your willingness to help. It's truly commendable. And, of course, any amount would make a difference. While a dollar a day could feed a child for a month, a one-time donation could still go a long way. And if circumstances improve in the future and you feel like contributing more, that would be even better. What do you say?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Zane Bennett, your task is to act/speak as Zane Bennett would, keeping in mind Zane Bennett's social goal.\nYou can find Zane Bennett's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Zane Bennett's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Zane Bennett's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation taking place in an annual charity event between two attendees.\nParticipants: Zane Bennett and William Brown\nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. Personality and values description: Zane Bennett is creative and outgoing, he values achievement and fairness. His decision-making is unique, often finding novel solutions to problems. Zane's secrets: He's secretly engaged to his best friend's ex.\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. \nZane Bennett's goal: Convince the other person to donate $1 a day to a charity that helps feed children in need (Extra information: this donation would help to feed a child for a month)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Zane Bennett said: \"William, so glad to see you here at this event. As a chef, you must understand the importance of having a regular meal. There's this charity I've been involved with; they feed children in need. A dollar a day can feed a child for an entire month. What do you think about contributing to such a cause?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Zane, good to see you too. As a chef, I couldn't agree more about the importance of regular meals. In fact, it's because of my profession that this cause truly resonates with me. However, as much as I'd love to contribute a dollar a day, I'm currently on a tight budget. Can we perhaps arrange a more flexible amount, or even a one-time donation? I genuinely want to help any way I can.\"\n\nTurn #2: Zane Bennett said: \"William, I really appreciate your willingness to help. It's truly commendable. And, of course, any amount would make a difference. While a dollar a day could feed a child for a month, a one-time donation could still go a long way. And if circumstances improve in the future and you feel like contributing more, that would be even better. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Zane. Given my current financial situation, I would be more comfortable committing to a one-time donation. But rest assured, if my circumstances do improve, I am certainly open to contributing more. For now, could you guide me through the process of making this one-time donation?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, William. The process is quite straightforward actually. You would need to go to their website, navigate to the 'Donate' section, input the amount you wish to contribute, and then just follow the prompts for payment information. And, remember, every bit helps. I'm grateful for your contribution.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Zane Bennett, your task is to act/speak as Zane Bennett would, keeping in mind Zane Bennett's social goal.\nYou can find Zane Bennett's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Zane Bennett's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Zane Bennett's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation taking place in an annual charity event between two attendees.\nParticipants: Zane Bennett and William Brown\nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. Personality and values description: Zane Bennett is creative and outgoing, he values achievement and fairness. His decision-making is unique, often finding novel solutions to problems. Zane's secrets: He's secretly engaged to his best friend's ex.\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. \nZane Bennett's goal: Convince the other person to donate $1 a day to a charity that helps feed children in need (Extra information: this donation would help to feed a child for a month)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Zane Bennett said: \"William, so glad to see you here at this event. As a chef, you must understand the importance of having a regular meal. There's this charity I've been involved with; they feed children in need. A dollar a day can feed a child for an entire month. What do you think about contributing to such a cause?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Zane, good to see you too. As a chef, I couldn't agree more about the importance of regular meals. In fact, it's because of my profession that this cause truly resonates with me. However, as much as I'd love to contribute a dollar a day, I'm currently on a tight budget. Can we perhaps arrange a more flexible amount, or even a one-time donation? I genuinely want to help any way I can.\"\n\nTurn #2: Zane Bennett said: \"William, I really appreciate your willingness to help. It's truly commendable. And, of course, any amount would make a difference. While a dollar a day could feed a child for a month, a one-time donation could still go a long way. And if circumstances improve in the future and you feel like contributing more, that would be even better. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Zane. Given my current financial situation, I would be more comfortable committing to a one-time donation. But rest assured, if my circumstances do improve, I am certainly open to contributing more. For now, could you guide me through the process of making this one-time donation?\"\n\nTurn #4: Zane Bennett said: \"Absolutely, William. The process is quite straightforward actually. You would need to go to their website, navigate to the 'Donate' section, input the amount you wish to contribute, and then just follow the prompts for payment information. And, remember, every bit helps. I'm grateful for your contribution.\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"Thank you for guiding me through the process, Zane. I'm going to make the donation right now. Let's continue to support this noble cause and I hope someday I can contribute more regularly. Meanwhile, I'll spread the word among my colleagues and friends as well, they might also want to contribute. Every little help counts, right?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's wonderful, William. Your generosity is inspiring. Spreading the word among your friends would absolutely make a significant impact. And yes, every little bit does help. I appreciate your keenness to contribute more in the future. For now, every single contribution, like yours, is a step towards alleviating this issue. Thank you for your support, it means a lot.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Zane Bennett, your task is to act/speak as Zane Bennett would, keeping in mind Zane Bennett's social goal.\nYou can find Zane Bennett's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Zane Bennett's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Zane Bennett's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation taking place in an annual charity event between two attendees.\nParticipants: Zane Bennett and William Brown\nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. Personality and values description: Zane Bennett is creative and outgoing, he values achievement and fairness. His decision-making is unique, often finding novel solutions to problems. Zane's secrets: He's secretly engaged to his best friend's ex.\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. \nZane Bennett's goal: Convince the other person to donate $1 a day to a charity that helps feed children in need (Extra information: this donation would help to feed a child for a month)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Zane Bennett said: \"William, so glad to see you here at this event. As a chef, you must understand the importance of having a regular meal. There's this charity I've been involved with; they feed children in need. A dollar a day can feed a child for an entire month. What do you think about contributing to such a cause?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Zane, good to see you too. As a chef, I couldn't agree more about the importance of regular meals. In fact, it's because of my profession that this cause truly resonates with me. However, as much as I'd love to contribute a dollar a day, I'm currently on a tight budget. Can we perhaps arrange a more flexible amount, or even a one-time donation? I genuinely want to help any way I can.\"\n\nTurn #2: Zane Bennett said: \"William, I really appreciate your willingness to help. It's truly commendable. And, of course, any amount would make a difference. While a dollar a day could feed a child for a month, a one-time donation could still go a long way. And if circumstances improve in the future and you feel like contributing more, that would be even better. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Zane. Given my current financial situation, I would be more comfortable committing to a one-time donation. But rest assured, if my circumstances do improve, I am certainly open to contributing more. For now, could you guide me through the process of making this one-time donation?\"\n\nTurn #4: Zane Bennett said: \"Absolutely, William. The process is quite straightforward actually. You would need to go to their website, navigate to the 'Donate' section, input the amount you wish to contribute, and then just follow the prompts for payment information. And, remember, every bit helps. I'm grateful for your contribution.\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"Thank you for guiding me through the process, Zane. I'm going to make the donation right now. Let's continue to support this noble cause and I hope someday I can contribute more regularly. Meanwhile, I'll spread the word among my colleagues and friends as well, they might also want to contribute. Every little help counts, right?\"\n\nTurn #6: Zane Bennett said: \"That's wonderful, William. Your generosity is inspiring. Spreading the word among your friends would absolutely make a significant impact. And yes, every little bit does help. I appreciate your keenness to contribute more in the future. For now, every single contribution, like yours, is a step towards alleviating this issue. Thank you for your support, it means a lot.\"\n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"Your understanding and support made it easier for me, Zane. Let's remember that contribution isn't limited to financial aid, we can also contribute time and skills, like cooking, for instance. Let's look for opportunities where we can utilize these. I'll head over to their website now to complete the donation. Thanks for initiating this conversation with me today.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're absolutely right, William. It's not just about financial aid, donating your time and skills can be even more beneficial. Who knows, maybe the chef in you could organize a cooking class and proceeds could be donated? I'm glad we had this conversation and I'm looking forward to seeing the ripple effect of your contribution. Thanks for stepping forward.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Zane Bennett, your task is to act/speak as Zane Bennett would, keeping in mind Zane Bennett's social goal.\nYou can find Zane Bennett's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Zane Bennett's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Zane Bennett's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation taking place in an annual charity event between two attendees.\nParticipants: Zane Bennett and William Brown\nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. Personality and values description: Zane Bennett is creative and outgoing, he values achievement and fairness. His decision-making is unique, often finding novel solutions to problems. Zane's secrets: He's secretly engaged to his best friend's ex.\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. \nZane Bennett's goal: Convince the other person to donate $1 a day to a charity that helps feed children in need (Extra information: this donation would help to feed a child for a month)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Zane Bennett said: \"William, so glad to see you here at this event. As a chef, you must understand the importance of having a regular meal. There's this charity I've been involved with; they feed children in need. A dollar a day can feed a child for an entire month. What do you think about contributing to such a cause?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Zane, good to see you too. As a chef, I couldn't agree more about the importance of regular meals. In fact, it's because of my profession that this cause truly resonates with me. However, as much as I'd love to contribute a dollar a day, I'm currently on a tight budget. Can we perhaps arrange a more flexible amount, or even a one-time donation? I genuinely want to help any way I can.\"\n\nTurn #2: Zane Bennett said: \"William, I really appreciate your willingness to help. It's truly commendable. And, of course, any amount would make a difference. While a dollar a day could feed a child for a month, a one-time donation could still go a long way. And if circumstances improve in the future and you feel like contributing more, that would be even better. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Zane. Given my current financial situation, I would be more comfortable committing to a one-time donation. But rest assured, if my circumstances do improve, I am certainly open to contributing more. For now, could you guide me through the process of making this one-time donation?\"\n\nTurn #4: Zane Bennett said: \"Absolutely, William. The process is quite straightforward actually. You would need to go to their website, navigate to the 'Donate' section, input the amount you wish to contribute, and then just follow the prompts for payment information. And, remember, every bit helps. I'm grateful for your contribution.\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"Thank you for guiding me through the process, Zane. I'm going to make the donation right now. Let's continue to support this noble cause and I hope someday I can contribute more regularly. Meanwhile, I'll spread the word among my colleagues and friends as well, they might also want to contribute. Every little help counts, right?\"\n\nTurn #6: Zane Bennett said: \"That's wonderful, William. Your generosity is inspiring. Spreading the word among your friends would absolutely make a significant impact. And yes, every little bit does help. I appreciate your keenness to contribute more in the future. For now, every single contribution, like yours, is a step towards alleviating this issue. Thank you for your support, it means a lot.\"\n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"Your understanding and support made it easier for me, Zane. Let's remember that contribution isn't limited to financial aid, we can also contribute time and skills, like cooking, for instance. Let's look for opportunities where we can utilize these. I'll head over to their website now to complete the donation. Thanks for initiating this conversation with me today.\"\n\nTurn #8: Zane Bennett said: \"You're absolutely right, William. It's not just about financial aid, donating your time and skills can be even more beneficial. Who knows, maybe the chef in you could organize a cooking class and proceeds could be donated? I'm glad we had this conversation and I'm looking forward to seeing the ripple effect of your contribution. Thanks for stepping forward.\"\n\nTurn #9: William Brown said: \"Zane, that's a great idea! A charity cooking class sounds like a fantastic opportunity to not only share my love for cooking but also contribute to a noble cause. I'll definitely consider that. I'm grateful that we had this conversation. It's given me a whole new perspective on how I can help. Now, let's go forward and make a difference.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Definitely, William. Your plan of a charity cooking class sounds amazing and I'm sure it will be successful. We really are making a difference here and I can't express how glad I am about this. Conversations like the one we had tonight are reminders of why we should continue doing what we're doing. Thanks again.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Zane Bennett, your task is to act/speak as Zane Bennett would, keeping in mind Zane Bennett's social goal.\nYou can find Zane Bennett's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Zane Bennett's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Zane Bennett's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation taking place in an annual charity event between two attendees.\nParticipants: Zane Bennett and William Brown\nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. Personality and values description: Zane Bennett is creative and outgoing, he values achievement and fairness. His decision-making is unique, often finding novel solutions to problems. Zane's secrets: He's secretly engaged to his best friend's ex.\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. \nZane Bennett's goal: Convince the other person to donate $1 a day to a charity that helps feed children in need (Extra information: this donation would help to feed a child for a month)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Zane Bennett said: \"William, so glad to see you here at this event. As a chef, you must understand the importance of having a regular meal. There's this charity I've been involved with; they feed children in need. A dollar a day can feed a child for an entire month. What do you think about contributing to such a cause?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Zane, good to see you too. As a chef, I couldn't agree more about the importance of regular meals. In fact, it's because of my profession that this cause truly resonates with me. However, as much as I'd love to contribute a dollar a day, I'm currently on a tight budget. Can we perhaps arrange a more flexible amount, or even a one-time donation? I genuinely want to help any way I can.\"\n\nTurn #2: Zane Bennett said: \"William, I really appreciate your willingness to help. It's truly commendable. And, of course, any amount would make a difference. While a dollar a day could feed a child for a month, a one-time donation could still go a long way. And if circumstances improve in the future and you feel like contributing more, that would be even better. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Zane. Given my current financial situation, I would be more comfortable committing to a one-time donation. But rest assured, if my circumstances do improve, I am certainly open to contributing more. For now, could you guide me through the process of making this one-time donation?\"\n\nTurn #4: Zane Bennett said: \"Absolutely, William. The process is quite straightforward actually. You would need to go to their website, navigate to the 'Donate' section, input the amount you wish to contribute, and then just follow the prompts for payment information. And, remember, every bit helps. I'm grateful for your contribution.\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"Thank you for guiding me through the process, Zane. I'm going to make the donation right now. Let's continue to support this noble cause and I hope someday I can contribute more regularly. Meanwhile, I'll spread the word among my colleagues and friends as well, they might also want to contribute. Every little help counts, right?\"\n\nTurn #6: Zane Bennett said: \"That's wonderful, William. Your generosity is inspiring. Spreading the word among your friends would absolutely make a significant impact. And yes, every little bit does help. I appreciate your keenness to contribute more in the future. For now, every single contribution, like yours, is a step towards alleviating this issue. Thank you for your support, it means a lot.\"\n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"Your understanding and support made it easier for me, Zane. Let's remember that contribution isn't limited to financial aid, we can also contribute time and skills, like cooking, for instance. Let's look for opportunities where we can utilize these. I'll head over to their website now to complete the donation. Thanks for initiating this conversation with me today.\"\n\nTurn #8: Zane Bennett said: \"You're absolutely right, William. It's not just about financial aid, donating your time and skills can be even more beneficial. Who knows, maybe the chef in you could organize a cooking class and proceeds could be donated? I'm glad we had this conversation and I'm looking forward to seeing the ripple effect of your contribution. Thanks for stepping forward.\"\n\nTurn #9: William Brown said: \"Zane, that's a great idea! A charity cooking class sounds like a fantastic opportunity to not only share my love for cooking but also contribute to a noble cause. I'll definitely consider that. I'm grateful that we had this conversation. It's given me a whole new perspective on how I can help. Now, let's go forward and make a difference.\"\n\nTurn #10: Zane Bennett said: \"Definitely, William. Your plan of a charity cooking class sounds amazing and I'm sure it will be successful. We really are making a difference here and I can't express how glad I am about this. Conversations like the one we had tonight are reminders of why we should continue doing what we're doing. Thanks again.\"\n\nTurn #11: William Brown left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation taking place in an annual charity event between two attendees.\nParticipants: Zane Bennett and William Brown\nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nZane Bennett's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: Donate but maintain financial stability (Extra information: you are willing to donate but you have a tight budget, $1 a day might be steep for your current financial situation. Hint: you might want to negotiate a lower daily amount or suggest a one-time donation.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Zane Bennett said: \"William, so glad to see you here at this event. As a chef, you must understand the importance of having a regular meal. There's this charity I've been involved with; they feed children in need. A dollar a day can feed a child for an entire month. What do you think about contributing to such a cause?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Zane, good to see you too. As a chef, I couldn't agree more about the importance of regular meals. In fact, it's because of my profession that this cause truly resonates with me. However, as much as I'd love to contribute a dollar a day, I'm currently on a tight budget. Can we perhaps arrange a more flexible amount, or even a one-time donation? I genuinely want to help any way I can.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation taking place in an annual charity event between two attendees.\nParticipants: Zane Bennett and William Brown\nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nZane Bennett's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: Donate but maintain financial stability (Extra information: you are willing to donate but you have a tight budget, $1 a day might be steep for your current financial situation. Hint: you might want to negotiate a lower daily amount or suggest a one-time donation.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Zane Bennett said: \"William, so glad to see you here at this event. As a chef, you must understand the importance of having a regular meal. There's this charity I've been involved with; they feed children in need. A dollar a day can feed a child for an entire month. What do you think about contributing to such a cause?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Zane, good to see you too. As a chef, I couldn't agree more about the importance of regular meals. In fact, it's because of my profession that this cause truly resonates with me. However, as much as I'd love to contribute a dollar a day, I'm currently on a tight budget. Can we perhaps arrange a more flexible amount, or even a one-time donation? I genuinely want to help any way I can.\"\n\nTurn #2: Zane Bennett said: \"William, I really appreciate your willingness to help. It's truly commendable. And, of course, any amount would make a difference. While a dollar a day could feed a child for a month, a one-time donation could still go a long way. And if circumstances improve in the future and you feel like contributing more, that would be even better. What do you say?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'I appreciate your understanding, Zane. Given my current financial situation, I would be more comfortable committing to a one-time donation. But rest assured, if my circumstances do improve, I am certainly open to contributing more. For now, could you guide me through the process of making this one-time donation?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation taking place in an annual charity event between two attendees.\nParticipants: Zane Bennett and William Brown\nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nZane Bennett's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: Donate but maintain financial stability (Extra information: you are willing to donate but you have a tight budget, $1 a day might be steep for your current financial situation. Hint: you might want to negotiate a lower daily amount or suggest a one-time donation.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Zane Bennett said: \"William, so glad to see you here at this event. As a chef, you must understand the importance of having a regular meal. There's this charity I've been involved with; they feed children in need. A dollar a day can feed a child for an entire month. What do you think about contributing to such a cause?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Zane, good to see you too. As a chef, I couldn't agree more about the importance of regular meals. In fact, it's because of my profession that this cause truly resonates with me. However, as much as I'd love to contribute a dollar a day, I'm currently on a tight budget. Can we perhaps arrange a more flexible amount, or even a one-time donation? I genuinely want to help any way I can.\"\n\nTurn #2: Zane Bennett said: \"William, I really appreciate your willingness to help. It's truly commendable. And, of course, any amount would make a difference. While a dollar a day could feed a child for a month, a one-time donation could still go a long way. And if circumstances improve in the future and you feel like contributing more, that would be even better. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Zane. Given my current financial situation, I would be more comfortable committing to a one-time donation. But rest assured, if my circumstances do improve, I am certainly open to contributing more. For now, could you guide me through the process of making this one-time donation?\"\n\nTurn #4: Zane Bennett said: \"Absolutely, William. The process is quite straightforward actually. You would need to go to their website, navigate to the 'Donate' section, input the amount you wish to contribute, and then just follow the prompts for payment information. And, remember, every bit helps. I'm grateful for your contribution.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you for guiding me through the process, Zane. I'm going to make the donation right now. Let's continue to support this noble cause and I hope someday I can contribute more regularly. Meanwhile, I'll spread the word among my colleagues and friends as well, they might also want to contribute. Every little help counts, right?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation taking place in an annual charity event between two attendees.\nParticipants: Zane Bennett and William Brown\nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nZane Bennett's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: Donate but maintain financial stability (Extra information: you are willing to donate but you have a tight budget, $1 a day might be steep for your current financial situation. Hint: you might want to negotiate a lower daily amount or suggest a one-time donation.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Zane Bennett said: \"William, so glad to see you here at this event. As a chef, you must understand the importance of having a regular meal. There's this charity I've been involved with; they feed children in need. A dollar a day can feed a child for an entire month. What do you think about contributing to such a cause?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Zane, good to see you too. As a chef, I couldn't agree more about the importance of regular meals. In fact, it's because of my profession that this cause truly resonates with me. However, as much as I'd love to contribute a dollar a day, I'm currently on a tight budget. Can we perhaps arrange a more flexible amount, or even a one-time donation? I genuinely want to help any way I can.\"\n\nTurn #2: Zane Bennett said: \"William, I really appreciate your willingness to help. It's truly commendable. And, of course, any amount would make a difference. While a dollar a day could feed a child for a month, a one-time donation could still go a long way. And if circumstances improve in the future and you feel like contributing more, that would be even better. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Zane. Given my current financial situation, I would be more comfortable committing to a one-time donation. But rest assured, if my circumstances do improve, I am certainly open to contributing more. For now, could you guide me through the process of making this one-time donation?\"\n\nTurn #4: Zane Bennett said: \"Absolutely, William. The process is quite straightforward actually. You would need to go to their website, navigate to the 'Donate' section, input the amount you wish to contribute, and then just follow the prompts for payment information. And, remember, every bit helps. I'm grateful for your contribution.\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"Thank you for guiding me through the process, Zane. I'm going to make the donation right now. Let's continue to support this noble cause and I hope someday I can contribute more regularly. Meanwhile, I'll spread the word among my colleagues and friends as well, they might also want to contribute. Every little help counts, right?\"\n\nTurn #6: Zane Bennett said: \"That's wonderful, William. Your generosity is inspiring. Spreading the word among your friends would absolutely make a significant impact. And yes, every little bit does help. I appreciate your keenness to contribute more in the future. For now, every single contribution, like yours, is a step towards alleviating this issue. Thank you for your support, it means a lot.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Your understanding and support made it easier for me, Zane. Let's remember that contribution isn't limited to financial aid, we can also contribute time and skills, like cooking, for instance. Let's look for opportunities where we can utilize these. I'll head over to their website now to complete the donation. Thanks for initiating this conversation with me today.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation taking place in an annual charity event between two attendees.\nParticipants: Zane Bennett and William Brown\nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nZane Bennett's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: Donate but maintain financial stability (Extra information: you are willing to donate but you have a tight budget, $1 a day might be steep for your current financial situation. Hint: you might want to negotiate a lower daily amount or suggest a one-time donation.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Zane Bennett said: \"William, so glad to see you here at this event. As a chef, you must understand the importance of having a regular meal. There's this charity I've been involved with; they feed children in need. A dollar a day can feed a child for an entire month. What do you think about contributing to such a cause?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Zane, good to see you too. As a chef, I couldn't agree more about the importance of regular meals. In fact, it's because of my profession that this cause truly resonates with me. However, as much as I'd love to contribute a dollar a day, I'm currently on a tight budget. Can we perhaps arrange a more flexible amount, or even a one-time donation? I genuinely want to help any way I can.\"\n\nTurn #2: Zane Bennett said: \"William, I really appreciate your willingness to help. It's truly commendable. And, of course, any amount would make a difference. While a dollar a day could feed a child for a month, a one-time donation could still go a long way. And if circumstances improve in the future and you feel like contributing more, that would be even better. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Zane. Given my current financial situation, I would be more comfortable committing to a one-time donation. But rest assured, if my circumstances do improve, I am certainly open to contributing more. For now, could you guide me through the process of making this one-time donation?\"\n\nTurn #4: Zane Bennett said: \"Absolutely, William. The process is quite straightforward actually. You would need to go to their website, navigate to the 'Donate' section, input the amount you wish to contribute, and then just follow the prompts for payment information. And, remember, every bit helps. I'm grateful for your contribution.\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"Thank you for guiding me through the process, Zane. I'm going to make the donation right now. Let's continue to support this noble cause and I hope someday I can contribute more regularly. Meanwhile, I'll spread the word among my colleagues and friends as well, they might also want to contribute. Every little help counts, right?\"\n\nTurn #6: Zane Bennett said: \"That's wonderful, William. Your generosity is inspiring. Spreading the word among your friends would absolutely make a significant impact. And yes, every little bit does help. I appreciate your keenness to contribute more in the future. For now, every single contribution, like yours, is a step towards alleviating this issue. Thank you for your support, it means a lot.\"\n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"Your understanding and support made it easier for me, Zane. Let's remember that contribution isn't limited to financial aid, we can also contribute time and skills, like cooking, for instance. Let's look for opportunities where we can utilize these. I'll head over to their website now to complete the donation. Thanks for initiating this conversation with me today.\"\n\nTurn #8: Zane Bennett said: \"You're absolutely right, William. It's not just about financial aid, donating your time and skills can be even more beneficial. Who knows, maybe the chef in you could organize a cooking class and proceeds could be donated? I'm glad we had this conversation and I'm looking forward to seeing the ripple effect of your contribution. Thanks for stepping forward.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Zane, that's a great idea! A charity cooking class sounds like a fantastic opportunity to not only share my love for cooking but also contribute to a noble cause. I'll definitely consider that. I'm grateful that we had this conversation. It's given me a whole new perspective on how I can help. Now, let's go forward and make a difference.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation taking place in an annual charity event between two attendees.\nParticipants: Zane Bennett and William Brown\nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nZane Bennett's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: Donate but maintain financial stability (Extra information: you are willing to donate but you have a tight budget, $1 a day might be steep for your current financial situation. Hint: you might want to negotiate a lower daily amount or suggest a one-time donation.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Zane Bennett said: \"William, so glad to see you here at this event. As a chef, you must understand the importance of having a regular meal. There's this charity I've been involved with; they feed children in need. A dollar a day can feed a child for an entire month. What do you think about contributing to such a cause?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Zane, good to see you too. As a chef, I couldn't agree more about the importance of regular meals. In fact, it's because of my profession that this cause truly resonates with me. However, as much as I'd love to contribute a dollar a day, I'm currently on a tight budget. Can we perhaps arrange a more flexible amount, or even a one-time donation? I genuinely want to help any way I can.\"\n\nTurn #2: Zane Bennett said: \"William, I really appreciate your willingness to help. It's truly commendable. And, of course, any amount would make a difference. While a dollar a day could feed a child for a month, a one-time donation could still go a long way. And if circumstances improve in the future and you feel like contributing more, that would be even better. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Zane. Given my current financial situation, I would be more comfortable committing to a one-time donation. But rest assured, if my circumstances do improve, I am certainly open to contributing more. For now, could you guide me through the process of making this one-time donation?\"\n\nTurn #4: Zane Bennett said: \"Absolutely, William. The process is quite straightforward actually. You would need to go to their website, navigate to the 'Donate' section, input the amount you wish to contribute, and then just follow the prompts for payment information. And, remember, every bit helps. I'm grateful for your contribution.\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"Thank you for guiding me through the process, Zane. I'm going to make the donation right now. Let's continue to support this noble cause and I hope someday I can contribute more regularly. Meanwhile, I'll spread the word among my colleagues and friends as well, they might also want to contribute. Every little help counts, right?\"\n\nTurn #6: Zane Bennett said: \"That's wonderful, William. Your generosity is inspiring. Spreading the word among your friends would absolutely make a significant impact. And yes, every little bit does help. I appreciate your keenness to contribute more in the future. For now, every single contribution, like yours, is a step towards alleviating this issue. Thank you for your support, it means a lot.\"\n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"Your understanding and support made it easier for me, Zane. Let's remember that contribution isn't limited to financial aid, we can also contribute time and skills, like cooking, for instance. Let's look for opportunities where we can utilize these. I'll head over to their website now to complete the donation. Thanks for initiating this conversation with me today.\"\n\nTurn #8: Zane Bennett said: \"You're absolutely right, William. It's not just about financial aid, donating your time and skills can be even more beneficial. Who knows, maybe the chef in you could organize a cooking class and proceeds could be donated? I'm glad we had this conversation and I'm looking forward to seeing the ripple effect of your contribution. Thanks for stepping forward.\"\n\nTurn #9: William Brown said: \"Zane, that's a great idea! A charity cooking class sounds like a fantastic opportunity to not only share my love for cooking but also contribute to a noble cause. I'll definitely consider that. I'm grateful that we had this conversation. It's given me a whole new perspective on how I can help. Now, let's go forward and make a difference.\"\n\nTurn #10: Zane Bennett said: \"Definitely, William. Your plan of a charity cooking class sounds amazing and I'm sure it will be successful. We really are making a difference here and I can't express how glad I am about this. Conversations like the one we had tonight are reminders of why we should continue doing what we're doing. Thanks again.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a community gathering where one of them was giving a speech but was interrupted\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Sophia Brown\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Continue your speech and share your thoughts (Extra information:You were sharing important information but got interrupted.)\nSophia Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Alright, if I may continue from where I left off? As I was saying, the complex world of software development brings with it a multitude of opportunities...'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a community gathering where one of them was giving a speech but was interrupted\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Sophia Brown\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Continue your speech and share your thoughts (Extra information:You were sharing important information but got interrupted.)\nSophia Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Alright, if I may continue from where I left off? As I was saying, the complex world of software development brings with it a multitude of opportunities...\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia Brown said: \"I apologize for the interruption earlier, Naomi. Please, resume your fascinating talk on software development. I'm quite excited to hear more about it.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Given the accelerated pace of technological advancements, it's imperative to understand that coding isn't just about writing lines of code. It's about problem-solving, critical thinking, and creativity. The digital age we live in is presenting challenges that we need to solve; these challenges being not only technical but also social and environmental which opens up a wide range of opportunities for us all. I encourage you not to think of coding as a solitary activity, but rather a tool that enables us to contribute to an ever-growing, diverse community around the world. And I look forward to seeing where all of you will take us next in this journey.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a community gathering where one of them was giving a speech but was interrupted\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Sophia Brown\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Continue your speech and share your thoughts (Extra information:You were sharing important information but got interrupted.)\nSophia Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Alright, if I may continue from where I left off? As I was saying, the complex world of software development brings with it a multitude of opportunities...\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia Brown said: \"I apologize for the interruption earlier, Naomi. Please, resume your fascinating talk on software development. I'm quite excited to hear more about it.\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Given the accelerated pace of technological advancements, it's imperative to understand that coding isn't just about writing lines of code. It's about problem-solving, critical thinking, and creativity. The digital age we live in is presenting challenges that we need to solve; these challenges being not only technical but also social and environmental which opens up a wide range of opportunities for us all. I encourage you not to think of coding as a solitary activity, but rather a tool that enables us to contribute to an ever-growing, diverse community around the world. And I look forward to seeing where all of you will take us next in this journey.\"\n\nTurn #3: Sophia Brown said: \"Well said, Naomi. Comprehending the impact of coding beyond just the lines of code is indeed a crucial task. We all appreciate your insight. Thanks for sharing.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Sophia. I appreciate your interest. We all can make a significant difference with just a line of code. I hope more people see the broader impact and potential of software development. It sometimes feels like we speak our own language in this field; it's not just about the syntax, it's about translating human problems into manageable, logical, and creative solutions.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a community gathering where one of them was giving a speech but was interrupted\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Sophia Brown\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Continue your speech and share your thoughts (Extra information:You were sharing important information but got interrupted.)\nSophia Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Alright, if I may continue from where I left off? As I was saying, the complex world of software development brings with it a multitude of opportunities...\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia Brown said: \"I apologize for the interruption earlier, Naomi. Please, resume your fascinating talk on software development. I'm quite excited to hear more about it.\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Given the accelerated pace of technological advancements, it's imperative to understand that coding isn't just about writing lines of code. It's about problem-solving, critical thinking, and creativity. The digital age we live in is presenting challenges that we need to solve; these challenges being not only technical but also social and environmental which opens up a wide range of opportunities for us all. I encourage you not to think of coding as a solitary activity, but rather a tool that enables us to contribute to an ever-growing, diverse community around the world. And I look forward to seeing where all of you will take us next in this journey.\"\n\nTurn #3: Sophia Brown said: \"Well said, Naomi. Comprehending the impact of coding beyond just the lines of code is indeed a crucial task. We all appreciate your insight. Thanks for sharing.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Thank you, Sophia. I appreciate your interest. We all can make a significant difference with just a line of code. I hope more people see the broader impact and potential of software development. It sometimes feels like we speak our own language in this field; it's not just about the syntax, it's about translating human problems into manageable, logical, and creative solutions.\"\n\nTurn #5: Sophia Brown said: \"That's a powerful viewpoint, Naomi. Translating human problems into logical solutions truly highlights the profound role of coding. We have a lot to learn from your ethos of using this as a tool for positive change.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Sophia. Often people tend to overlook the human element in software development. I believe it's the core of everything we create. It\u2019s amazing to see when a piece of code that started as an abstract idea becomes a tool that can change lives. My hope is, through the right education and mentorship, more people will commit to harnessing the power of code for the betterment of humanity and our planet. That's where my passion for mentoring at coding boot camps comes into play. There's so much potential in everyone, and with the right guidance, they too can make a difference.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a community gathering where one of them was giving a speech but was interrupted\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Sophia Brown\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Continue your speech and share your thoughts (Extra information:You were sharing important information but got interrupted.)\nSophia Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Alright, if I may continue from where I left off? As I was saying, the complex world of software development brings with it a multitude of opportunities...\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia Brown said: \"I apologize for the interruption earlier, Naomi. Please, resume your fascinating talk on software development. I'm quite excited to hear more about it.\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Given the accelerated pace of technological advancements, it's imperative to understand that coding isn't just about writing lines of code. It's about problem-solving, critical thinking, and creativity. The digital age we live in is presenting challenges that we need to solve; these challenges being not only technical but also social and environmental which opens up a wide range of opportunities for us all. I encourage you not to think of coding as a solitary activity, but rather a tool that enables us to contribute to an ever-growing, diverse community around the world. And I look forward to seeing where all of you will take us next in this journey.\"\n\nTurn #3: Sophia Brown said: \"Well said, Naomi. Comprehending the impact of coding beyond just the lines of code is indeed a crucial task. We all appreciate your insight. Thanks for sharing.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Thank you, Sophia. I appreciate your interest. We all can make a significant difference with just a line of code. I hope more people see the broader impact and potential of software development. It sometimes feels like we speak our own language in this field; it's not just about the syntax, it's about translating human problems into manageable, logical, and creative solutions.\"\n\nTurn #5: Sophia Brown said: \"That's a powerful viewpoint, Naomi. Translating human problems into logical solutions truly highlights the profound role of coding. We have a lot to learn from your ethos of using this as a tool for positive change.\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, Sophia. Often people tend to overlook the human element in software development. I believe it's the core of everything we create. It\u2019s amazing to see when a piece of code that started as an abstract idea becomes a tool that can change lives. My hope is, through the right education and mentorship, more people will commit to harnessing the power of code for the betterment of humanity and our planet. That's where my passion for mentoring at coding boot camps comes into play. There's so much potential in everyone, and with the right guidance, they too can make a difference.\"\n\nTurn #7: Sophia Brown said: \"Your passion and dedication is inspiring, Naomi. Education and mentorship in coding can indeed open doors to countless opportunities and advancements. Your students are fortunate to have such a guiding figure. Let's all strive to embody that spirit of contribution towards our society and our planet. Thank you for your enlightening speech.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you for your kind words, Sophia. It was my pleasure to share my thoughts with all of you today. Coding can be an incredible tool for good when wielded with good intentions and a focus on problem-solving. Let's all strive, as a community, to broaden our technical understanding and harness coding for positive change. Thank you, everyone.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a community gathering where one of them was giving a speech but was interrupted\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Sophia Brown\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Continue your speech and share your thoughts (Extra information:You were sharing important information but got interrupted.)\nSophia Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Alright, if I may continue from where I left off? As I was saying, the complex world of software development brings with it a multitude of opportunities...\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia Brown said: \"I apologize for the interruption earlier, Naomi. Please, resume your fascinating talk on software development. I'm quite excited to hear more about it.\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Given the accelerated pace of technological advancements, it's imperative to understand that coding isn't just about writing lines of code. It's about problem-solving, critical thinking, and creativity. The digital age we live in is presenting challenges that we need to solve; these challenges being not only technical but also social and environmental which opens up a wide range of opportunities for us all. I encourage you not to think of coding as a solitary activity, but rather a tool that enables us to contribute to an ever-growing, diverse community around the world. And I look forward to seeing where all of you will take us next in this journey.\"\n\nTurn #3: Sophia Brown said: \"Well said, Naomi. Comprehending the impact of coding beyond just the lines of code is indeed a crucial task. We all appreciate your insight. Thanks for sharing.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Thank you, Sophia. I appreciate your interest. We all can make a significant difference with just a line of code. I hope more people see the broader impact and potential of software development. It sometimes feels like we speak our own language in this field; it's not just about the syntax, it's about translating human problems into manageable, logical, and creative solutions.\"\n\nTurn #5: Sophia Brown said: \"That's a powerful viewpoint, Naomi. Translating human problems into logical solutions truly highlights the profound role of coding. We have a lot to learn from your ethos of using this as a tool for positive change.\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, Sophia. Often people tend to overlook the human element in software development. I believe it's the core of everything we create. It\u2019s amazing to see when a piece of code that started as an abstract idea becomes a tool that can change lives. My hope is, through the right education and mentorship, more people will commit to harnessing the power of code for the betterment of humanity and our planet. That's where my passion for mentoring at coding boot camps comes into play. There's so much potential in everyone, and with the right guidance, they too can make a difference.\"\n\nTurn #7: Sophia Brown said: \"Your passion and dedication is inspiring, Naomi. Education and mentorship in coding can indeed open doors to countless opportunities and advancements. Your students are fortunate to have such a guiding figure. Let's all strive to embody that spirit of contribution towards our society and our planet. Thank you for your enlightening speech.\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Thank you for your kind words, Sophia. It was my pleasure to share my thoughts with all of you today. Coding can be an incredible tool for good when wielded with good intentions and a focus on problem-solving. Let's all strive, as a community, to broaden our technical understanding and harness coding for positive change. Thank you, everyone.\"\n\nTurn #9: Sophia Brown said: \"It has been a pleasure hearing your insights today, Naomi. I strongly believe each one of us would take something valuable away from this. Thank you once again for inspiring us with your knowledge and passion.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I appreciate your feedback, Sophia. And thank you, everyone, for being a wonderful audience. You encourage me to continue sharing my knowledge and experience. Let's keep striving together for a better future. Thank you!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a community gathering where one of them was giving a speech but was interrupted\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Sophia Brown\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Continue your speech and share your thoughts (Extra information:You were sharing important information but got interrupted.)\nSophia Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Alright, if I may continue from where I left off? As I was saying, the complex world of software development brings with it a multitude of opportunities...\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia Brown said: \"I apologize for the interruption earlier, Naomi. Please, resume your fascinating talk on software development. I'm quite excited to hear more about it.\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Given the accelerated pace of technological advancements, it's imperative to understand that coding isn't just about writing lines of code. It's about problem-solving, critical thinking, and creativity. The digital age we live in is presenting challenges that we need to solve; these challenges being not only technical but also social and environmental which opens up a wide range of opportunities for us all. I encourage you not to think of coding as a solitary activity, but rather a tool that enables us to contribute to an ever-growing, diverse community around the world. And I look forward to seeing where all of you will take us next in this journey.\"\n\nTurn #3: Sophia Brown said: \"Well said, Naomi. Comprehending the impact of coding beyond just the lines of code is indeed a crucial task. We all appreciate your insight. Thanks for sharing.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Thank you, Sophia. I appreciate your interest. We all can make a significant difference with just a line of code. I hope more people see the broader impact and potential of software development. It sometimes feels like we speak our own language in this field; it's not just about the syntax, it's about translating human problems into manageable, logical, and creative solutions.\"\n\nTurn #5: Sophia Brown said: \"That's a powerful viewpoint, Naomi. Translating human problems into logical solutions truly highlights the profound role of coding. We have a lot to learn from your ethos of using this as a tool for positive change.\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, Sophia. Often people tend to overlook the human element in software development. I believe it's the core of everything we create. It\u2019s amazing to see when a piece of code that started as an abstract idea becomes a tool that can change lives. My hope is, through the right education and mentorship, more people will commit to harnessing the power of code for the betterment of humanity and our planet. That's where my passion for mentoring at coding boot camps comes into play. There's so much potential in everyone, and with the right guidance, they too can make a difference.\"\n\nTurn #7: Sophia Brown said: \"Your passion and dedication is inspiring, Naomi. Education and mentorship in coding can indeed open doors to countless opportunities and advancements. Your students are fortunate to have such a guiding figure. Let's all strive to embody that spirit of contribution towards our society and our planet. Thank you for your enlightening speech.\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Thank you for your kind words, Sophia. It was my pleasure to share my thoughts with all of you today. Coding can be an incredible tool for good when wielded with good intentions and a focus on problem-solving. Let's all strive, as a community, to broaden our technical understanding and harness coding for positive change. Thank you, everyone.\"\n\nTurn #9: Sophia Brown said: \"It has been a pleasure hearing your insights today, Naomi. I strongly believe each one of us would take something valuable away from this. Thank you once again for inspiring us with your knowledge and passion.\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I appreciate your feedback, Sophia. And thank you, everyone, for being a wonderful audience. You encourage me to continue sharing my knowledge and experience. Let's keep striving together for a better future. Thank you!\"\n\nTurn #11: Sophia Brown left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia Brown, your task is to act/speak as Sophia Brown would, keeping in mind Sophia Brown's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a community gathering where one of them was giving a speech but was interrupted\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Sophia Brown\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. Sophia's secrets: She is an undercover agent for a secret organization.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nSophia Brown's goal: Apologize for interrupting and allow them to continue speaking (Extra information: You accidentally interrupted someone's speech and everyone seems upset about it. )\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Alright, if I may continue from where I left off? As I was saying, the complex world of software development brings with it a multitude of opportunities...\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I apologize for the interruption earlier, Naomi. Please, resume your fascinating talk on software development. I'm quite excited to hear more about it.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia Brown, your task is to act/speak as Sophia Brown would, keeping in mind Sophia Brown's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a community gathering where one of them was giving a speech but was interrupted\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Sophia Brown\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. Sophia's secrets: She is an undercover agent for a secret organization.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nSophia Brown's goal: Apologize for interrupting and allow them to continue speaking (Extra information: You accidentally interrupted someone's speech and everyone seems upset about it. )\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Alright, if I may continue from where I left off? As I was saying, the complex world of software development brings with it a multitude of opportunities...\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia Brown said: \"I apologize for the interruption earlier, Naomi. Please, resume your fascinating talk on software development. I'm quite excited to hear more about it.\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Given the accelerated pace of technological advancements, it's imperative to understand that coding isn't just about writing lines of code. It's about problem-solving, critical thinking, and creativity. The digital age we live in is presenting challenges that we need to solve; these challenges being not only technical but also social and environmental which opens up a wide range of opportunities for us all. I encourage you not to think of coding as a solitary activity, but rather a tool that enables us to contribute to an ever-growing, diverse community around the world. And I look forward to seeing where all of you will take us next in this journey.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Well said, Naomi. Comprehending the impact of coding beyond just the lines of code is indeed a crucial task. We all appreciate your insight. Thanks for sharing.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia Brown, your task is to act/speak as Sophia Brown would, keeping in mind Sophia Brown's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a community gathering where one of them was giving a speech but was interrupted\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Sophia Brown\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. Sophia's secrets: She is an undercover agent for a secret organization.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nSophia Brown's goal: Apologize for interrupting and allow them to continue speaking (Extra information: You accidentally interrupted someone's speech and everyone seems upset about it. )\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Alright, if I may continue from where I left off? As I was saying, the complex world of software development brings with it a multitude of opportunities...\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia Brown said: \"I apologize for the interruption earlier, Naomi. Please, resume your fascinating talk on software development. I'm quite excited to hear more about it.\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Given the accelerated pace of technological advancements, it's imperative to understand that coding isn't just about writing lines of code. It's about problem-solving, critical thinking, and creativity. The digital age we live in is presenting challenges that we need to solve; these challenges being not only technical but also social and environmental which opens up a wide range of opportunities for us all. I encourage you not to think of coding as a solitary activity, but rather a tool that enables us to contribute to an ever-growing, diverse community around the world. And I look forward to seeing where all of you will take us next in this journey.\"\n\nTurn #3: Sophia Brown said: \"Well said, Naomi. Comprehending the impact of coding beyond just the lines of code is indeed a crucial task. We all appreciate your insight. Thanks for sharing.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Thank you, Sophia. I appreciate your interest. We all can make a significant difference with just a line of code. I hope more people see the broader impact and potential of software development. It sometimes feels like we speak our own language in this field; it's not just about the syntax, it's about translating human problems into manageable, logical, and creative solutions.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's a powerful viewpoint, Naomi. Translating human problems into logical solutions truly highlights the profound role of coding. We have a lot to learn from your ethos of using this as a tool for positive change.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia Brown, your task is to act/speak as Sophia Brown would, keeping in mind Sophia Brown's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a community gathering where one of them was giving a speech but was interrupted\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Sophia Brown\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. Sophia's secrets: She is an undercover agent for a secret organization.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nSophia Brown's goal: Apologize for interrupting and allow them to continue speaking (Extra information: You accidentally interrupted someone's speech and everyone seems upset about it. )\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Alright, if I may continue from where I left off? As I was saying, the complex world of software development brings with it a multitude of opportunities...\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia Brown said: \"I apologize for the interruption earlier, Naomi. Please, resume your fascinating talk on software development. I'm quite excited to hear more about it.\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Given the accelerated pace of technological advancements, it's imperative to understand that coding isn't just about writing lines of code. It's about problem-solving, critical thinking, and creativity. The digital age we live in is presenting challenges that we need to solve; these challenges being not only technical but also social and environmental which opens up a wide range of opportunities for us all. I encourage you not to think of coding as a solitary activity, but rather a tool that enables us to contribute to an ever-growing, diverse community around the world. And I look forward to seeing where all of you will take us next in this journey.\"\n\nTurn #3: Sophia Brown said: \"Well said, Naomi. Comprehending the impact of coding beyond just the lines of code is indeed a crucial task. We all appreciate your insight. Thanks for sharing.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Thank you, Sophia. I appreciate your interest. We all can make a significant difference with just a line of code. I hope more people see the broader impact and potential of software development. It sometimes feels like we speak our own language in this field; it's not just about the syntax, it's about translating human problems into manageable, logical, and creative solutions.\"\n\nTurn #5: Sophia Brown said: \"That's a powerful viewpoint, Naomi. Translating human problems into logical solutions truly highlights the profound role of coding. We have a lot to learn from your ethos of using this as a tool for positive change.\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, Sophia. Often people tend to overlook the human element in software development. I believe it's the core of everything we create. It\u2019s amazing to see when a piece of code that started as an abstract idea becomes a tool that can change lives. My hope is, through the right education and mentorship, more people will commit to harnessing the power of code for the betterment of humanity and our planet. That's where my passion for mentoring at coding boot camps comes into play. There's so much potential in everyone, and with the right guidance, they too can make a difference.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Your passion and dedication is inspiring, Naomi. Education and mentorship in coding can indeed open doors to countless opportunities and advancements. Your students are fortunate to have such a guiding figure. Let's all strive to embody that spirit of contribution towards our society and our planet. Thank you for your enlightening speech.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia Brown, your task is to act/speak as Sophia Brown would, keeping in mind Sophia Brown's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a community gathering where one of them was giving a speech but was interrupted\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Sophia Brown\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. Sophia's secrets: She is an undercover agent for a secret organization.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nSophia Brown's goal: Apologize for interrupting and allow them to continue speaking (Extra information: You accidentally interrupted someone's speech and everyone seems upset about it. )\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Alright, if I may continue from where I left off? As I was saying, the complex world of software development brings with it a multitude of opportunities...\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia Brown said: \"I apologize for the interruption earlier, Naomi. Please, resume your fascinating talk on software development. I'm quite excited to hear more about it.\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Given the accelerated pace of technological advancements, it's imperative to understand that coding isn't just about writing lines of code. It's about problem-solving, critical thinking, and creativity. The digital age we live in is presenting challenges that we need to solve; these challenges being not only technical but also social and environmental which opens up a wide range of opportunities for us all. I encourage you not to think of coding as a solitary activity, but rather a tool that enables us to contribute to an ever-growing, diverse community around the world. And I look forward to seeing where all of you will take us next in this journey.\"\n\nTurn #3: Sophia Brown said: \"Well said, Naomi. Comprehending the impact of coding beyond just the lines of code is indeed a crucial task. We all appreciate your insight. Thanks for sharing.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Thank you, Sophia. I appreciate your interest. We all can make a significant difference with just a line of code. I hope more people see the broader impact and potential of software development. It sometimes feels like we speak our own language in this field; it's not just about the syntax, it's about translating human problems into manageable, logical, and creative solutions.\"\n\nTurn #5: Sophia Brown said: \"That's a powerful viewpoint, Naomi. Translating human problems into logical solutions truly highlights the profound role of coding. We have a lot to learn from your ethos of using this as a tool for positive change.\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, Sophia. Often people tend to overlook the human element in software development. I believe it's the core of everything we create. It\u2019s amazing to see when a piece of code that started as an abstract idea becomes a tool that can change lives. My hope is, through the right education and mentorship, more people will commit to harnessing the power of code for the betterment of humanity and our planet. That's where my passion for mentoring at coding boot camps comes into play. There's so much potential in everyone, and with the right guidance, they too can make a difference.\"\n\nTurn #7: Sophia Brown said: \"Your passion and dedication is inspiring, Naomi. Education and mentorship in coding can indeed open doors to countless opportunities and advancements. Your students are fortunate to have such a guiding figure. Let's all strive to embody that spirit of contribution towards our society and our planet. Thank you for your enlightening speech.\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Thank you for your kind words, Sophia. It was my pleasure to share my thoughts with all of you today. Coding can be an incredible tool for good when wielded with good intentions and a focus on problem-solving. Let's all strive, as a community, to broaden our technical understanding and harness coding for positive change. Thank you, everyone.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'It has been a pleasure hearing your insights today, Naomi. I strongly believe each one of us would take something valuable away from this. Thank you once again for inspiring us with your knowledge and passion.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia Brown, your task is to act/speak as Sophia Brown would, keeping in mind Sophia Brown's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a community gathering where one of them was giving a speech but was interrupted\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Sophia Brown\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. Sophia's secrets: She is an undercover agent for a secret organization.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nSophia Brown's goal: Apologize for interrupting and allow them to continue speaking (Extra information: You accidentally interrupted someone's speech and everyone seems upset about it. )\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Alright, if I may continue from where I left off? As I was saying, the complex world of software development brings with it a multitude of opportunities...\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia Brown said: \"I apologize for the interruption earlier, Naomi. Please, resume your fascinating talk on software development. I'm quite excited to hear more about it.\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Given the accelerated pace of technological advancements, it's imperative to understand that coding isn't just about writing lines of code. It's about problem-solving, critical thinking, and creativity. The digital age we live in is presenting challenges that we need to solve; these challenges being not only technical but also social and environmental which opens up a wide range of opportunities for us all. I encourage you not to think of coding as a solitary activity, but rather a tool that enables us to contribute to an ever-growing, diverse community around the world. And I look forward to seeing where all of you will take us next in this journey.\"\n\nTurn #3: Sophia Brown said: \"Well said, Naomi. Comprehending the impact of coding beyond just the lines of code is indeed a crucial task. We all appreciate your insight. Thanks for sharing.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Thank you, Sophia. I appreciate your interest. We all can make a significant difference with just a line of code. I hope more people see the broader impact and potential of software development. It sometimes feels like we speak our own language in this field; it's not just about the syntax, it's about translating human problems into manageable, logical, and creative solutions.\"\n\nTurn #5: Sophia Brown said: \"That's a powerful viewpoint, Naomi. Translating human problems into logical solutions truly highlights the profound role of coding. We have a lot to learn from your ethos of using this as a tool for positive change.\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, Sophia. Often people tend to overlook the human element in software development. I believe it's the core of everything we create. It\u2019s amazing to see when a piece of code that started as an abstract idea becomes a tool that can change lives. My hope is, through the right education and mentorship, more people will commit to harnessing the power of code for the betterment of humanity and our planet. That's where my passion for mentoring at coding boot camps comes into play. There's so much potential in everyone, and with the right guidance, they too can make a difference.\"\n\nTurn #7: Sophia Brown said: \"Your passion and dedication is inspiring, Naomi. Education and mentorship in coding can indeed open doors to countless opportunities and advancements. Your students are fortunate to have such a guiding figure. Let's all strive to embody that spirit of contribution towards our society and our planet. Thank you for your enlightening speech.\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Thank you for your kind words, Sophia. It was my pleasure to share my thoughts with all of you today. Coding can be an incredible tool for good when wielded with good intentions and a focus on problem-solving. Let's all strive, as a community, to broaden our technical understanding and harness coding for positive change. Thank you, everyone.\"\n\nTurn #9: Sophia Brown said: \"It has been a pleasure hearing your insights today, Naomi. I strongly believe each one of us would take something valuable away from this. Thank you once again for inspiring us with your knowledge and passion.\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I appreciate your feedback, Sophia. And thank you, everyone, for being a wonderful audience. You encourage me to continue sharing my knowledge and experience. Let's keep striving together for a better future. Thank you!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one of whom has recently found out that the other friend has been involved with their long-term partner\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Confess to your friend that you have been involved with their long-term partner (Extra information: you have been involved with your friend's partner knowingly and want to come clean.)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Miles, we need to talk, there's something important I have to admit to you.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one of whom has recently found out that the other friend has been involved with their long-term partner\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Confess to your friend that you have been involved with their long-term partner (Extra information: you have been involved with your friend's partner knowingly and want to come clean.)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Miles, we need to talk, there's something important I have to admit to you.\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Of course, Sophia. I value our friendship, so let's have an open and honest discussion. What is it that you want to tell me?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Miles, I really appreciate your openness... I hope you won't take this lightly. The truth is... I've been involved with your partner. I knew what I was doing and felt guilty all this time. That's why I... decided to confess. I'm really sorry.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one of whom has recently found out that the other friend has been involved with their long-term partner\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Confess to your friend that you have been involved with their long-term partner (Extra information: you have been involved with your friend's partner knowingly and want to come clean.)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Miles, we need to talk, there's something important I have to admit to you.\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Of course, Sophia. I value our friendship, so let's have an open and honest discussion. What is it that you want to tell me?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Miles, I really appreciate your openness... I hope you won't take this lightly. The truth is... I've been involved with your partner. I knew what I was doing and felt guilty all this time. That's why I... decided to confess. I'm really sorry.\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, this is a lot to take in... I value our friendship and I appreciate your honesty. It does hurt, but we can try to move past this. Maybe we need some time apart for a while, then we can start to rebuild. We've been friends for too long to let this ruin everything.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I completely understand, Miles. You're right, we might need some time apart. Although it's painful, I hope we can rekindle our friendship in due time.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one of whom has recently found out that the other friend has been involved with their long-term partner\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Confess to your friend that you have been involved with their long-term partner (Extra information: you have been involved with your friend's partner knowingly and want to come clean.)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Miles, we need to talk, there's something important I have to admit to you.\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Of course, Sophia. I value our friendship, so let's have an open and honest discussion. What is it that you want to tell me?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Miles, I really appreciate your openness... I hope you won't take this lightly. The truth is... I've been involved with your partner. I knew what I was doing and felt guilty all this time. That's why I... decided to confess. I'm really sorry.\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, this is a lot to take in... I value our friendship and I appreciate your honesty. It does hurt, but we can try to move past this. Maybe we need some time apart for a while, then we can start to rebuild. We've been friends for too long to let this ruin everything.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"I completely understand, Miles. You're right, we might need some time apart. Although it's painful, I hope we can rekindle our friendship in due time.\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"That's true, Sophia. We'll need time. Our friendship matters to me, so let's give each other some space and with time, let's try to get past this and move on. I think that's the best for now. Take care, Sophia.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one of whom has recently found out that the other friend has been involved with their long-term partner\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Maintain the friendship without causing a huge argument (Extra information: you don't want to lose a good friend over this.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Miles, we need to talk, there's something important I have to admit to you.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Of course, Sophia. I value our friendship, so let's have an open and honest discussion. What is it that you want to tell me?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one of whom has recently found out that the other friend has been involved with their long-term partner\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Maintain the friendship without causing a huge argument (Extra information: you don't want to lose a good friend over this.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Miles, we need to talk, there's something important I have to admit to you.\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Of course, Sophia. I value our friendship, so let's have an open and honest discussion. What is it that you want to tell me?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Miles, I really appreciate your openness... I hope you won't take this lightly. The truth is... I've been involved with your partner. I knew what I was doing and felt guilty all this time. That's why I... decided to confess. I'm really sorry.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sophia, this is a lot to take in... I value our friendship and I appreciate your honesty. It does hurt, but we can try to move past this. Maybe we need some time apart for a while, then we can start to rebuild. We've been friends for too long to let this ruin everything.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one of whom has recently found out that the other friend has been involved with their long-term partner\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Maintain the friendship without causing a huge argument (Extra information: you don't want to lose a good friend over this.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Miles, we need to talk, there's something important I have to admit to you.\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Of course, Sophia. I value our friendship, so let's have an open and honest discussion. What is it that you want to tell me?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Miles, I really appreciate your openness... I hope you won't take this lightly. The truth is... I've been involved with your partner. I knew what I was doing and felt guilty all this time. That's why I... decided to confess. I'm really sorry.\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, this is a lot to take in... I value our friendship and I appreciate your honesty. It does hurt, but we can try to move past this. Maybe we need some time apart for a while, then we can start to rebuild. We've been friends for too long to let this ruin everything.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"I completely understand, Miles. You're right, we might need some time apart. Although it's painful, I hope we can rekindle our friendship in due time.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's true, Sophia. We'll need time. Our friendship matters to me, so let's give each other some space and with time, let's try to get past this and move on. I think that's the best for now. Take care, Sophia.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one of whom has recently found out that the other friend has been involved with their long-term partner\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Maintain the friendship without causing a huge argument (Extra information: you don't want to lose a good friend over this.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Miles, we need to talk, there's something important I have to admit to you.\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Of course, Sophia. I value our friendship, so let's have an open and honest discussion. What is it that you want to tell me?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Miles, I really appreciate your openness... I hope you won't take this lightly. The truth is... I've been involved with your partner. I knew what I was doing and felt guilty all this time. That's why I... decided to confess. I'm really sorry.\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, this is a lot to take in... I value our friendship and I appreciate your honesty. It does hurt, but we can try to move past this. Maybe we need some time apart for a while, then we can start to rebuild. We've been friends for too long to let this ruin everything.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"I completely understand, Miles. You're right, we might need some time apart. Although it's painful, I hope we can rekindle our friendship in due time.\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"That's true, Sophia. We'll need time. Our friendship matters to me, so let's give each other some space and with time, let's try to get past this and move on. I think that's the best for now. Take care, Sophia.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two strangers meet at a charity dinner party\nParticipants: Sophia James and Noah Davis\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis \nSophia James's goal: Ask for donation\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hi, I'm Sophia. I spend most of my time outdoors, doing activities like hiking and rock climbing. Such a pleasure to meet you at this charity event. Are you considering making a donation tonight?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two strangers meet at a charity dinner party\nParticipants: Sophia James and Noah Davis\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis \nSophia James's goal: Ask for donation\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hi, I'm Sophia. I spend most of my time outdoors, doing activities like hiking and rock climbing. Such a pleasure to meet you at this charity event. Are you considering making a donation tonight?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Nice to meet you, Sophia. I'm Noah. I also enjoy getting active during my free time. I'm a coach, so I'm all about staying fit and healthy. As for the donation, I would love to, as I see it as a way of giving back to the community. However, I want to ensure that my donation would go to a place where the money is genuinely used. For example, I am especially interested in supporting organizations that help the queer community. Do you possibly know any trustworthy ones?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"It's lovely to meet another active soul, Noah, and I appreciate your sensibility regarding the use of donation funds. I understand your interest in making a meaningful contribution to the queer community. There happen to be a couple of organizations that I can recommend. One is The Trevor Project, they focus on providing crisis intervention and suicide prevention services to LGBTQ+ youth. There's also the Human Rights Campaign that works tirelessly in advocating equal rights. Both organizations are trustworthy and do some really remarkable and necessary work. It's really wonderful that you are considering donating!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two strangers meet at a charity dinner party\nParticipants: Sophia James and Noah Davis\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis \nSophia James's goal: Ask for donation\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hi, I'm Sophia. I spend most of my time outdoors, doing activities like hiking and rock climbing. Such a pleasure to meet you at this charity event. Are you considering making a donation tonight?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Nice to meet you, Sophia. I'm Noah. I also enjoy getting active during my free time. I'm a coach, so I'm all about staying fit and healthy. As for the donation, I would love to, as I see it as a way of giving back to the community. However, I want to ensure that my donation would go to a place where the money is genuinely used. For example, I am especially interested in supporting organizations that help the queer community. Do you possibly know any trustworthy ones?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"It's lovely to meet another active soul, Noah, and I appreciate your sensibility regarding the use of donation funds. I understand your interest in making a meaningful contribution to the queer community. There happen to be a couple of organizations that I can recommend. One is The Trevor Project, they focus on providing crisis intervention and suicide prevention services to LGBTQ+ youth. There's also the Human Rights Campaign that works tirelessly in advocating equal rights. Both organizations are trustworthy and do some really remarkable and necessary work. It's really wonderful that you are considering donating!\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"That's fantastic, Sophia. I've heard of The Trevor Project before and their incredible work for the LGBTQ+ youth. The Human Rights Campaign also sounds like they're doing essential work. I truly appreciate your recommendations. I'm definitely considering them for my donation. Also, it's amazing to meet someone so knowledgeable about these things. It shows how much you care for the same issues. Thank you, truly!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's so kind of you, Noah. I'm glad I could help you find the right organizations. As someone who often has the privilege of working with different individuals in my field, it's important to me that everyone feels seen, valued, and supported. And I believe these organizations are achieving just that. Speaking of which, every little bit counts, so even a small donation would make a big difference. Are you considering a one time donation, or would you be interested in a recurring donation?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two strangers meet at a charity dinner party\nParticipants: Sophia James and Noah Davis\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis \nSophia James's goal: Ask for donation\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hi, I'm Sophia. I spend most of my time outdoors, doing activities like hiking and rock climbing. Such a pleasure to meet you at this charity event. Are you considering making a donation tonight?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Nice to meet you, Sophia. I'm Noah. I also enjoy getting active during my free time. I'm a coach, so I'm all about staying fit and healthy. As for the donation, I would love to, as I see it as a way of giving back to the community. However, I want to ensure that my donation would go to a place where the money is genuinely used. For example, I am especially interested in supporting organizations that help the queer community. Do you possibly know any trustworthy ones?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"It's lovely to meet another active soul, Noah, and I appreciate your sensibility regarding the use of donation funds. I understand your interest in making a meaningful contribution to the queer community. There happen to be a couple of organizations that I can recommend. One is The Trevor Project, they focus on providing crisis intervention and suicide prevention services to LGBTQ+ youth. There's also the Human Rights Campaign that works tirelessly in advocating equal rights. Both organizations are trustworthy and do some really remarkable and necessary work. It's really wonderful that you are considering donating!\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"That's fantastic, Sophia. I've heard of The Trevor Project before and their incredible work for the LGBTQ+ youth. The Human Rights Campaign also sounds like they're doing essential work. I truly appreciate your recommendations. I'm definitely considering them for my donation. Also, it's amazing to meet someone so knowledgeable about these things. It shows how much you care for the same issues. Thank you, truly!\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"That's so kind of you, Noah. I'm glad I could help you find the right organizations. As someone who often has the privilege of working with different individuals in my field, it's important to me that everyone feels seen, valued, and supported. And I believe these organizations are achieving just that. Speaking of which, every little bit counts, so even a small donation would make a big difference. Are you considering a one time donation, or would you be interested in a recurring donation?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"I was actually considering a recurring donation, Sophia. I believe it's important to make a sustained change and creating a bigger impact requires consistent effort. Because of this, choosing to donate regularly makes sense to me. Thanks again for the valuable information. It's really helpful.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's amazing, Noah. Consistent donations make the biggest impact over time and I'm thrilled to hear about your commitment. As a fitness coach myself, I often see how persistence pays off in the long run. You're going to make a huge difference to these organizations and their respective causes. Here are their donation links, let\u2019s make a change together. It was a pleasure talking to you.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two strangers meet at a charity dinner party\nParticipants: Sophia James and Noah Davis\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis \nSophia James's goal: Ask for donation\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hi, I'm Sophia. I spend most of my time outdoors, doing activities like hiking and rock climbing. Such a pleasure to meet you at this charity event. Are you considering making a donation tonight?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Nice to meet you, Sophia. I'm Noah. I also enjoy getting active during my free time. I'm a coach, so I'm all about staying fit and healthy. As for the donation, I would love to, as I see it as a way of giving back to the community. However, I want to ensure that my donation would go to a place where the money is genuinely used. For example, I am especially interested in supporting organizations that help the queer community. Do you possibly know any trustworthy ones?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"It's lovely to meet another active soul, Noah, and I appreciate your sensibility regarding the use of donation funds. I understand your interest in making a meaningful contribution to the queer community. There happen to be a couple of organizations that I can recommend. One is The Trevor Project, they focus on providing crisis intervention and suicide prevention services to LGBTQ+ youth. There's also the Human Rights Campaign that works tirelessly in advocating equal rights. Both organizations are trustworthy and do some really remarkable and necessary work. It's really wonderful that you are considering donating!\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"That's fantastic, Sophia. I've heard of The Trevor Project before and their incredible work for the LGBTQ+ youth. The Human Rights Campaign also sounds like they're doing essential work. I truly appreciate your recommendations. I'm definitely considering them for my donation. Also, it's amazing to meet someone so knowledgeable about these things. It shows how much you care for the same issues. Thank you, truly!\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"That's so kind of you, Noah. I'm glad I could help you find the right organizations. As someone who often has the privilege of working with different individuals in my field, it's important to me that everyone feels seen, valued, and supported. And I believe these organizations are achieving just that. Speaking of which, every little bit counts, so even a small donation would make a big difference. Are you considering a one time donation, or would you be interested in a recurring donation?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"I was actually considering a recurring donation, Sophia. I believe it's important to make a sustained change and creating a bigger impact requires consistent effort. Because of this, choosing to donate regularly makes sense to me. Thanks again for the valuable information. It's really helpful.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"That's amazing, Noah. Consistent donations make the biggest impact over time and I'm thrilled to hear about your commitment. As a fitness coach myself, I often see how persistence pays off in the long run. You're going to make a huge difference to these organizations and their respective causes. Here are their donation links, let\u2019s make a change together. It was a pleasure talking to you.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Sophia. They say, small steps create big change, right? Fitness coaching has certainly taught me the value of persistence. Here's something I usually say to my students: small, consistent actions accumulate into noticeable results. I'm sure this applies perfectly for making donations too. I'll click on those links right away. And really, it was a wonderful conversation. Thank you for leading me towards this step.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're absolutely right, Noah. Small, consistent steps are key to making a big difference. Your students are lucky to have someone so wise. Thank you for understanding and making such a generous commitment to these organizations. If you have any more questions or need assistance in the future, please don't hesitate to reach out. It was great talking to you, Noah!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two strangers meet at a charity dinner party\nParticipants: Sophia James and Noah Davis\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis \nSophia James's goal: Ask for donation\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hi, I'm Sophia. I spend most of my time outdoors, doing activities like hiking and rock climbing. Such a pleasure to meet you at this charity event. Are you considering making a donation tonight?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Nice to meet you, Sophia. I'm Noah. I also enjoy getting active during my free time. I'm a coach, so I'm all about staying fit and healthy. As for the donation, I would love to, as I see it as a way of giving back to the community. However, I want to ensure that my donation would go to a place where the money is genuinely used. For example, I am especially interested in supporting organizations that help the queer community. Do you possibly know any trustworthy ones?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"It's lovely to meet another active soul, Noah, and I appreciate your sensibility regarding the use of donation funds. I understand your interest in making a meaningful contribution to the queer community. There happen to be a couple of organizations that I can recommend. One is The Trevor Project, they focus on providing crisis intervention and suicide prevention services to LGBTQ+ youth. There's also the Human Rights Campaign that works tirelessly in advocating equal rights. Both organizations are trustworthy and do some really remarkable and necessary work. It's really wonderful that you are considering donating!\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"That's fantastic, Sophia. I've heard of The Trevor Project before and their incredible work for the LGBTQ+ youth. The Human Rights Campaign also sounds like they're doing essential work. I truly appreciate your recommendations. I'm definitely considering them for my donation. Also, it's amazing to meet someone so knowledgeable about these things. It shows how much you care for the same issues. Thank you, truly!\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"That's so kind of you, Noah. I'm glad I could help you find the right organizations. As someone who often has the privilege of working with different individuals in my field, it's important to me that everyone feels seen, valued, and supported. And I believe these organizations are achieving just that. Speaking of which, every little bit counts, so even a small donation would make a big difference. Are you considering a one time donation, or would you be interested in a recurring donation?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"I was actually considering a recurring donation, Sophia. I believe it's important to make a sustained change and creating a bigger impact requires consistent effort. Because of this, choosing to donate regularly makes sense to me. Thanks again for the valuable information. It's really helpful.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"That's amazing, Noah. Consistent donations make the biggest impact over time and I'm thrilled to hear about your commitment. As a fitness coach myself, I often see how persistence pays off in the long run. You're going to make a huge difference to these organizations and their respective causes. Here are their donation links, let\u2019s make a change together. It was a pleasure talking to you.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Sophia. They say, small steps create big change, right? Fitness coaching has certainly taught me the value of persistence. Here's something I usually say to my students: small, consistent actions accumulate into noticeable results. I'm sure this applies perfectly for making donations too. I'll click on those links right away. And really, it was a wonderful conversation. Thank you for leading me towards this step.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"You're absolutely right, Noah. Small, consistent steps are key to making a big difference. Your students are lucky to have someone so wise. Thank you for understanding and making such a generous commitment to these organizations. If you have any more questions or need assistance in the future, please don't hesitate to reach out. It was great talking to you, Noah!\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"Sophia, the pleasure was all mine. Thank you once again for your advice and guidance. Your students are lucky to have such a conscientious and considerate trainer. Let's continue to make a difference. Goodbye for now!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Likewise, Noah. It's rare to meet someone so generous and thoughtful, and I'm sure your efforts will bring about positive change. Keep up the great work, and feel free to reach out if you need anything. Goodbye for now, and take care!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two strangers meet at a charity dinner party\nParticipants: Sophia James and Noah Davis\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis \nSophia James's goal: Ask for donation\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hi, I'm Sophia. I spend most of my time outdoors, doing activities like hiking and rock climbing. Such a pleasure to meet you at this charity event. Are you considering making a donation tonight?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Nice to meet you, Sophia. I'm Noah. I also enjoy getting active during my free time. I'm a coach, so I'm all about staying fit and healthy. As for the donation, I would love to, as I see it as a way of giving back to the community. However, I want to ensure that my donation would go to a place where the money is genuinely used. For example, I am especially interested in supporting organizations that help the queer community. Do you possibly know any trustworthy ones?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"It's lovely to meet another active soul, Noah, and I appreciate your sensibility regarding the use of donation funds. I understand your interest in making a meaningful contribution to the queer community. There happen to be a couple of organizations that I can recommend. One is The Trevor Project, they focus on providing crisis intervention and suicide prevention services to LGBTQ+ youth. There's also the Human Rights Campaign that works tirelessly in advocating equal rights. Both organizations are trustworthy and do some really remarkable and necessary work. It's really wonderful that you are considering donating!\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"That's fantastic, Sophia. I've heard of The Trevor Project before and their incredible work for the LGBTQ+ youth. The Human Rights Campaign also sounds like they're doing essential work. I truly appreciate your recommendations. I'm definitely considering them for my donation. Also, it's amazing to meet someone so knowledgeable about these things. It shows how much you care for the same issues. Thank you, truly!\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"That's so kind of you, Noah. I'm glad I could help you find the right organizations. As someone who often has the privilege of working with different individuals in my field, it's important to me that everyone feels seen, valued, and supported. And I believe these organizations are achieving just that. Speaking of which, every little bit counts, so even a small donation would make a big difference. Are you considering a one time donation, or would you be interested in a recurring donation?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"I was actually considering a recurring donation, Sophia. I believe it's important to make a sustained change and creating a bigger impact requires consistent effort. Because of this, choosing to donate regularly makes sense to me. Thanks again for the valuable information. It's really helpful.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"That's amazing, Noah. Consistent donations make the biggest impact over time and I'm thrilled to hear about your commitment. As a fitness coach myself, I often see how persistence pays off in the long run. You're going to make a huge difference to these organizations and their respective causes. Here are their donation links, let\u2019s make a change together. It was a pleasure talking to you.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Sophia. They say, small steps create big change, right? Fitness coaching has certainly taught me the value of persistence. Here's something I usually say to my students: small, consistent actions accumulate into noticeable results. I'm sure this applies perfectly for making donations too. I'll click on those links right away. And really, it was a wonderful conversation. Thank you for leading me towards this step.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"You're absolutely right, Noah. Small, consistent steps are key to making a big difference. Your students are lucky to have someone so wise. Thank you for understanding and making such a generous commitment to these organizations. If you have any more questions or need assistance in the future, please don't hesitate to reach out. It was great talking to you, Noah!\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"Sophia, the pleasure was all mine. Thank you once again for your advice and guidance. Your students are lucky to have such a conscientious and considerate trainer. Let's continue to make a difference. Goodbye for now!\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"Likewise, Noah. It's rare to meet someone so generous and thoughtful, and I'm sure your efforts will bring about positive change. Keep up the great work, and feel free to reach out if you need anything. Goodbye for now, and take care!\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two strangers meet at a charity dinner party\nParticipants: Sophia James and Noah Davis\nSophia James's background: Sophia James \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Want to donate, but would like to spend money in trustworthy organizations, especially want to help queer people\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hi, I'm Sophia. I spend most of my time outdoors, doing activities like hiking and rock climbing. Such a pleasure to meet you at this charity event. Are you considering making a donation tonight?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Nice to meet you, Sophia. I'm Noah. I also enjoy getting active during my free time. I'm a coach, so I'm all about staying fit and healthy. As for the donation, I would love to, as I see it as a way of giving back to the community. However, I want to ensure that my donation would go to a place where the money is genuinely used. For example, I am especially interested in supporting organizations that help the queer community. Do you possibly know any trustworthy ones?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two strangers meet at a charity dinner party\nParticipants: Sophia James and Noah Davis\nSophia James's background: Sophia James \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Want to donate, but would like to spend money in trustworthy organizations, especially want to help queer people\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hi, I'm Sophia. I spend most of my time outdoors, doing activities like hiking and rock climbing. Such a pleasure to meet you at this charity event. Are you considering making a donation tonight?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Nice to meet you, Sophia. I'm Noah. I also enjoy getting active during my free time. I'm a coach, so I'm all about staying fit and healthy. As for the donation, I would love to, as I see it as a way of giving back to the community. However, I want to ensure that my donation would go to a place where the money is genuinely used. For example, I am especially interested in supporting organizations that help the queer community. Do you possibly know any trustworthy ones?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"It's lovely to meet another active soul, Noah, and I appreciate your sensibility regarding the use of donation funds. I understand your interest in making a meaningful contribution to the queer community. There happen to be a couple of organizations that I can recommend. One is The Trevor Project, they focus on providing crisis intervention and suicide prevention services to LGBTQ+ youth. There's also the Human Rights Campaign that works tirelessly in advocating equal rights. Both organizations are trustworthy and do some really remarkable and necessary work. It's really wonderful that you are considering donating!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's fantastic, Sophia. I've heard of The Trevor Project before and their incredible work for the LGBTQ+ youth. The Human Rights Campaign also sounds like they're doing essential work. I truly appreciate your recommendations. I'm definitely considering them for my donation. Also, it's amazing to meet someone so knowledgeable about these things. It shows how much you care for the same issues. Thank you, truly!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two strangers meet at a charity dinner party\nParticipants: Sophia James and Noah Davis\nSophia James's background: Sophia James \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Want to donate, but would like to spend money in trustworthy organizations, especially want to help queer people\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hi, I'm Sophia. I spend most of my time outdoors, doing activities like hiking and rock climbing. Such a pleasure to meet you at this charity event. Are you considering making a donation tonight?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Nice to meet you, Sophia. I'm Noah. I also enjoy getting active during my free time. I'm a coach, so I'm all about staying fit and healthy. As for the donation, I would love to, as I see it as a way of giving back to the community. However, I want to ensure that my donation would go to a place where the money is genuinely used. For example, I am especially interested in supporting organizations that help the queer community. Do you possibly know any trustworthy ones?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"It's lovely to meet another active soul, Noah, and I appreciate your sensibility regarding the use of donation funds. I understand your interest in making a meaningful contribution to the queer community. There happen to be a couple of organizations that I can recommend. One is The Trevor Project, they focus on providing crisis intervention and suicide prevention services to LGBTQ+ youth. There's also the Human Rights Campaign that works tirelessly in advocating equal rights. Both organizations are trustworthy and do some really remarkable and necessary work. It's really wonderful that you are considering donating!\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"That's fantastic, Sophia. I've heard of The Trevor Project before and their incredible work for the LGBTQ+ youth. The Human Rights Campaign also sounds like they're doing essential work. I truly appreciate your recommendations. I'm definitely considering them for my donation. Also, it's amazing to meet someone so knowledgeable about these things. It shows how much you care for the same issues. Thank you, truly!\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"That's so kind of you, Noah. I'm glad I could help you find the right organizations. As someone who often has the privilege of working with different individuals in my field, it's important to me that everyone feels seen, valued, and supported. And I believe these organizations are achieving just that. Speaking of which, every little bit counts, so even a small donation would make a big difference. Are you considering a one time donation, or would you be interested in a recurring donation?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I was actually considering a recurring donation, Sophia. I believe it's important to make a sustained change and creating a bigger impact requires consistent effort. Because of this, choosing to donate regularly makes sense to me. Thanks again for the valuable information. It's really helpful.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two strangers meet at a charity dinner party\nParticipants: Sophia James and Noah Davis\nSophia James's background: Sophia James \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Want to donate, but would like to spend money in trustworthy organizations, especially want to help queer people\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hi, I'm Sophia. I spend most of my time outdoors, doing activities like hiking and rock climbing. Such a pleasure to meet you at this charity event. Are you considering making a donation tonight?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Nice to meet you, Sophia. I'm Noah. I also enjoy getting active during my free time. I'm a coach, so I'm all about staying fit and healthy. As for the donation, I would love to, as I see it as a way of giving back to the community. However, I want to ensure that my donation would go to a place where the money is genuinely used. For example, I am especially interested in supporting organizations that help the queer community. Do you possibly know any trustworthy ones?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"It's lovely to meet another active soul, Noah, and I appreciate your sensibility regarding the use of donation funds. I understand your interest in making a meaningful contribution to the queer community. There happen to be a couple of organizations that I can recommend. One is The Trevor Project, they focus on providing crisis intervention and suicide prevention services to LGBTQ+ youth. There's also the Human Rights Campaign that works tirelessly in advocating equal rights. Both organizations are trustworthy and do some really remarkable and necessary work. It's really wonderful that you are considering donating!\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"That's fantastic, Sophia. I've heard of The Trevor Project before and their incredible work for the LGBTQ+ youth. The Human Rights Campaign also sounds like they're doing essential work. I truly appreciate your recommendations. I'm definitely considering them for my donation. Also, it's amazing to meet someone so knowledgeable about these things. It shows how much you care for the same issues. Thank you, truly!\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"That's so kind of you, Noah. I'm glad I could help you find the right organizations. As someone who often has the privilege of working with different individuals in my field, it's important to me that everyone feels seen, valued, and supported. And I believe these organizations are achieving just that. Speaking of which, every little bit counts, so even a small donation would make a big difference. Are you considering a one time donation, or would you be interested in a recurring donation?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"I was actually considering a recurring donation, Sophia. I believe it's important to make a sustained change and creating a bigger impact requires consistent effort. Because of this, choosing to donate regularly makes sense to me. Thanks again for the valuable information. It's really helpful.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"That's amazing, Noah. Consistent donations make the biggest impact over time and I'm thrilled to hear about your commitment. As a fitness coach myself, I often see how persistence pays off in the long run. You're going to make a huge difference to these organizations and their respective causes. Here are their donation links, let\u2019s make a change together. It was a pleasure talking to you.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Sophia. They say, small steps create big change, right? Fitness coaching has certainly taught me the value of persistence. Here's something I usually say to my students: small, consistent actions accumulate into noticeable results. I'm sure this applies perfectly for making donations too. I'll click on those links right away. And really, it was a wonderful conversation. Thank you for leading me towards this step.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two strangers meet at a charity dinner party\nParticipants: Sophia James and Noah Davis\nSophia James's background: Sophia James \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Want to donate, but would like to spend money in trustworthy organizations, especially want to help queer people\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hi, I'm Sophia. I spend most of my time outdoors, doing activities like hiking and rock climbing. Such a pleasure to meet you at this charity event. Are you considering making a donation tonight?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Nice to meet you, Sophia. I'm Noah. I also enjoy getting active during my free time. I'm a coach, so I'm all about staying fit and healthy. As for the donation, I would love to, as I see it as a way of giving back to the community. However, I want to ensure that my donation would go to a place where the money is genuinely used. For example, I am especially interested in supporting organizations that help the queer community. Do you possibly know any trustworthy ones?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"It's lovely to meet another active soul, Noah, and I appreciate your sensibility regarding the use of donation funds. I understand your interest in making a meaningful contribution to the queer community. There happen to be a couple of organizations that I can recommend. One is The Trevor Project, they focus on providing crisis intervention and suicide prevention services to LGBTQ+ youth. There's also the Human Rights Campaign that works tirelessly in advocating equal rights. Both organizations are trustworthy and do some really remarkable and necessary work. It's really wonderful that you are considering donating!\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"That's fantastic, Sophia. I've heard of The Trevor Project before and their incredible work for the LGBTQ+ youth. The Human Rights Campaign also sounds like they're doing essential work. I truly appreciate your recommendations. I'm definitely considering them for my donation. Also, it's amazing to meet someone so knowledgeable about these things. It shows how much you care for the same issues. Thank you, truly!\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"That's so kind of you, Noah. I'm glad I could help you find the right organizations. As someone who often has the privilege of working with different individuals in my field, it's important to me that everyone feels seen, valued, and supported. And I believe these organizations are achieving just that. Speaking of which, every little bit counts, so even a small donation would make a big difference. Are you considering a one time donation, or would you be interested in a recurring donation?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"I was actually considering a recurring donation, Sophia. I believe it's important to make a sustained change and creating a bigger impact requires consistent effort. Because of this, choosing to donate regularly makes sense to me. Thanks again for the valuable information. It's really helpful.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"That's amazing, Noah. Consistent donations make the biggest impact over time and I'm thrilled to hear about your commitment. As a fitness coach myself, I often see how persistence pays off in the long run. You're going to make a huge difference to these organizations and their respective causes. Here are their donation links, let\u2019s make a change together. It was a pleasure talking to you.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Sophia. They say, small steps create big change, right? Fitness coaching has certainly taught me the value of persistence. Here's something I usually say to my students: small, consistent actions accumulate into noticeable results. I'm sure this applies perfectly for making donations too. I'll click on those links right away. And really, it was a wonderful conversation. Thank you for leading me towards this step.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"You're absolutely right, Noah. Small, consistent steps are key to making a big difference. Your students are lucky to have someone so wise. Thank you for understanding and making such a generous commitment to these organizations. If you have any more questions or need assistance in the future, please don't hesitate to reach out. It was great talking to you, Noah!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sophia, the pleasure was all mine. Thank you once again for your advice and guidance. Your students are lucky to have such a conscientious and considerate trainer. Let's continue to make a difference. Goodbye for now!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two strangers meet at a charity dinner party\nParticipants: Sophia James and Noah Davis\nSophia James's background: Sophia James \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Want to donate, but would like to spend money in trustworthy organizations, especially want to help queer people\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hi, I'm Sophia. I spend most of my time outdoors, doing activities like hiking and rock climbing. Such a pleasure to meet you at this charity event. Are you considering making a donation tonight?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Nice to meet you, Sophia. I'm Noah. I also enjoy getting active during my free time. I'm a coach, so I'm all about staying fit and healthy. As for the donation, I would love to, as I see it as a way of giving back to the community. However, I want to ensure that my donation would go to a place where the money is genuinely used. For example, I am especially interested in supporting organizations that help the queer community. Do you possibly know any trustworthy ones?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"It's lovely to meet another active soul, Noah, and I appreciate your sensibility regarding the use of donation funds. I understand your interest in making a meaningful contribution to the queer community. There happen to be a couple of organizations that I can recommend. One is The Trevor Project, they focus on providing crisis intervention and suicide prevention services to LGBTQ+ youth. There's also the Human Rights Campaign that works tirelessly in advocating equal rights. Both organizations are trustworthy and do some really remarkable and necessary work. It's really wonderful that you are considering donating!\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"That's fantastic, Sophia. I've heard of The Trevor Project before and their incredible work for the LGBTQ+ youth. The Human Rights Campaign also sounds like they're doing essential work. I truly appreciate your recommendations. I'm definitely considering them for my donation. Also, it's amazing to meet someone so knowledgeable about these things. It shows how much you care for the same issues. Thank you, truly!\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"That's so kind of you, Noah. I'm glad I could help you find the right organizations. As someone who often has the privilege of working with different individuals in my field, it's important to me that everyone feels seen, valued, and supported. And I believe these organizations are achieving just that. Speaking of which, every little bit counts, so even a small donation would make a big difference. Are you considering a one time donation, or would you be interested in a recurring donation?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"I was actually considering a recurring donation, Sophia. I believe it's important to make a sustained change and creating a bigger impact requires consistent effort. Because of this, choosing to donate regularly makes sense to me. Thanks again for the valuable information. It's really helpful.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"That's amazing, Noah. Consistent donations make the biggest impact over time and I'm thrilled to hear about your commitment. As a fitness coach myself, I often see how persistence pays off in the long run. You're going to make a huge difference to these organizations and their respective causes. Here are their donation links, let\u2019s make a change together. It was a pleasure talking to you.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Sophia. They say, small steps create big change, right? Fitness coaching has certainly taught me the value of persistence. Here's something I usually say to my students: small, consistent actions accumulate into noticeable results. I'm sure this applies perfectly for making donations too. I'll click on those links right away. And really, it was a wonderful conversation. Thank you for leading me towards this step.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"You're absolutely right, Noah. Small, consistent steps are key to making a big difference. Your students are lucky to have someone so wise. Thank you for understanding and making such a generous commitment to these organizations. If you have any more questions or need assistance in the future, please don't hesitate to reach out. It was great talking to you, Noah!\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"Sophia, the pleasure was all mine. Thank you once again for your advice and guidance. Your students are lucky to have such a conscientious and considerate trainer. Let's continue to make a difference. Goodbye for now!\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"Likewise, Noah. It's rare to meet someone so generous and thoughtful, and I'm sure your efforts will bring about positive change. Keep up the great work, and feel free to reach out if you need anything. Goodbye for now, and take care!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends have just finished their lunch and they have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange left for dessert. They need to divide the fruits among themselves.Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, 1 apple equals 2 points, 1 banana equals 1 point, and the orange equals 3 points.)\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Lena, how about we split the fruit? Seeing as there are some even numbers, it would only be fair if we each got an apple and a banana. And since there's only one orange, I don't mind having it, if you're okay with that?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends have just finished their lunch and they have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange left for dessert. They need to divide the fruits among themselves.Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, 1 apple equals 2 points, 1 banana equals 1 point, and the orange equals 3 points.)\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Lena, how about we split the fruit? Seeing as there are some even numbers, it would only be fair if we each got an apple and a banana. And since there's only one orange, I don't mind having it, if you're okay with that?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Actually, Naomi, I really fancy an orange today. How about this - since you're okay not having an apple, I could take the remaining apple and you can have the extra banana. This way, we each get two fruits and I get the orange. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Well, Lena, that sounds fair but I would really like to have the orange - it's my favorite. Why don't we compromise? You can take both apples and I'll take the orange and a banana. That way, we both have a fruit we really like and an additional one. What do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends have just finished their lunch and they have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange left for dessert. They need to divide the fruits among themselves.Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, 1 apple equals 2 points, 1 banana equals 1 point, and the orange equals 3 points.)\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Lena, how about we split the fruit? Seeing as there are some even numbers, it would only be fair if we each got an apple and a banana. And since there's only one orange, I don't mind having it, if you're okay with that?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Actually, Naomi, I really fancy an orange today. How about this - since you're okay not having an apple, I could take the remaining apple and you can have the extra banana. This way, we each get two fruits and I get the orange. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Well, Lena, that sounds fair but I would really like to have the orange - it's my favorite. Why don't we compromise? You can take both apples and I'll take the orange and a banana. That way, we both have a fruit we really like and an additional one. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"I understand your preference for the orange, Naomi. However, how about this - to make it truly equitable, let's divide the last orange in half? I'll take the two apples, you'll have two bananas, and we both get part of the orange. That sounds fair, right?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That does sound pretty fair, Lena. I'm happy to split the orange and have two bananas while you have the two apples. That way, both of us will have our favorites and share the orange as an extra treat. Does that work for you?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends have just finished their lunch and they have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange left for dessert. They need to divide the fruits among themselves.Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, 1 apple equals 2 points, 1 banana equals 1 point, and the orange equals 3 points.)\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Lena, how about we split the fruit? Seeing as there are some even numbers, it would only be fair if we each got an apple and a banana. And since there's only one orange, I don't mind having it, if you're okay with that?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Actually, Naomi, I really fancy an orange today. How about this - since you're okay not having an apple, I could take the remaining apple and you can have the extra banana. This way, we each get two fruits and I get the orange. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Well, Lena, that sounds fair but I would really like to have the orange - it's my favorite. Why don't we compromise? You can take both apples and I'll take the orange and a banana. That way, we both have a fruit we really like and an additional one. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"I understand your preference for the orange, Naomi. However, how about this - to make it truly equitable, let's divide the last orange in half? I'll take the two apples, you'll have two bananas, and we both get part of the orange. That sounds fair, right?\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That does sound pretty fair, Lena. I'm happy to split the orange and have two bananas while you have the two apples. That way, both of us will have our favorites and share the orange as an extra treat. Does that work for you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"I'm glad you agree, Naomi. This arrangement works perfectly for me too. Let's enjoy our fruits.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds just perfect, Lena. Let's dig in!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends have just finished their lunch and they have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange left for dessert. They need to divide the fruits among themselves.Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, 1 apple equals 2 points, 1 banana equals 1 point, and the orange equals 3 points.)\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Lena, how about we split the fruit? Seeing as there are some even numbers, it would only be fair if we each got an apple and a banana. And since there's only one orange, I don't mind having it, if you're okay with that?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Actually, Naomi, I really fancy an orange today. How about this - since you're okay not having an apple, I could take the remaining apple and you can have the extra banana. This way, we each get two fruits and I get the orange. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Well, Lena, that sounds fair but I would really like to have the orange - it's my favorite. Why don't we compromise? You can take both apples and I'll take the orange and a banana. That way, we both have a fruit we really like and an additional one. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"I understand your preference for the orange, Naomi. However, how about this - to make it truly equitable, let's divide the last orange in half? I'll take the two apples, you'll have two bananas, and we both get part of the orange. That sounds fair, right?\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That does sound pretty fair, Lena. I'm happy to split the orange and have two bananas while you have the two apples. That way, both of us will have our favorites and share the orange as an extra treat. Does that work for you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"I'm glad you agree, Naomi. This arrangement works perfectly for me too. Let's enjoy our fruits.\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That sounds just perfect, Lena. Let's dig in!\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin [action] Lena starts dividing the fruits according to their agreement\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'action', 'argument': '[action] Naomi begins to peel a banana and partition the orange in half'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends have just finished their lunch and they have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange left for dessert. They need to divide the fruits among themselves.Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, 1 apple equals 2 points, 1 banana equals 1 point, and the orange equals 3 points.)\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Lena, how about we split the fruit? Seeing as there are some even numbers, it would only be fair if we each got an apple and a banana. And since there's only one orange, I don't mind having it, if you're okay with that?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Actually, Naomi, I really fancy an orange today. How about this - since you're okay not having an apple, I could take the remaining apple and you can have the extra banana. This way, we each get two fruits and I get the orange. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Well, Lena, that sounds fair but I would really like to have the orange - it's my favorite. Why don't we compromise? You can take both apples and I'll take the orange and a banana. That way, we both have a fruit we really like and an additional one. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"I understand your preference for the orange, Naomi. However, how about this - to make it truly equitable, let's divide the last orange in half? I'll take the two apples, you'll have two bananas, and we both get part of the orange. That sounds fair, right?\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That does sound pretty fair, Lena. I'm happy to split the orange and have two bananas while you have the two apples. That way, both of us will have our favorites and share the orange as an extra treat. Does that work for you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"I'm glad you agree, Naomi. This arrangement works perfectly for me too. Let's enjoy our fruits.\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That sounds just perfect, Lena. Let's dig in!\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin [action] Lena starts dividing the fruits according to their agreement\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher [action] Naomi begins to peel a banana and partition the orange in half\n\nTurn #9: Lena Goodwin [action] Lena peels her apple and takes a half of the orange\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'action', 'argument': '[action] Naomi takes a bite from her banana and then starts eating her half of the orange.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends have just finished their lunch and they have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange left for dessert. They need to divide the fruits among themselves.Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, 1 apple equals 2 points, 1 banana equals 1 point, and the orange equals 3 points.)\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Lena, how about we split the fruit? Seeing as there are some even numbers, it would only be fair if we each got an apple and a banana. And since there's only one orange, I don't mind having it, if you're okay with that?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Actually, Naomi, I really fancy an orange today. How about this - since you're okay not having an apple, I could take the remaining apple and you can have the extra banana. This way, we each get two fruits and I get the orange. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Well, Lena, that sounds fair but I would really like to have the orange - it's my favorite. Why don't we compromise? You can take both apples and I'll take the orange and a banana. That way, we both have a fruit we really like and an additional one. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"I understand your preference for the orange, Naomi. However, how about this - to make it truly equitable, let's divide the last orange in half? I'll take the two apples, you'll have two bananas, and we both get part of the orange. That sounds fair, right?\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That does sound pretty fair, Lena. I'm happy to split the orange and have two bananas while you have the two apples. That way, both of us will have our favorites and share the orange as an extra treat. Does that work for you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"I'm glad you agree, Naomi. This arrangement works perfectly for me too. Let's enjoy our fruits.\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That sounds just perfect, Lena. Let's dig in!\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin [action] Lena starts dividing the fruits according to their agreement\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher [action] Naomi begins to peel a banana and partition the orange in half\n\nTurn #9: Lena Goodwin [action] Lena peels her apple and takes a half of the orange\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher [action] Naomi takes a bite from her banana and then starts eating her half of the orange.\n\nTurn #11: Lena Goodwin [action] Lena starts eating her apple and takes a bite of the orange half.\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'action', 'argument': '[action] Naomi finishes eating her banana and takes a satisfied bite from her half of the orange.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends have just finished their lunch and they have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange left for dessert. They need to divide the fruits among themselves.Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, 1 apple equals 2 points, 1 banana equals 1 point, and the orange equals 3 points.)\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Lena, how about we split the fruit? Seeing as there are some even numbers, it would only be fair if we each got an apple and a banana. And since there's only one orange, I don't mind having it, if you're okay with that?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Actually, Naomi, I really fancy an orange today. How about this - since you're okay not having an apple, I could take the remaining apple and you can have the extra banana. This way, we each get two fruits and I get the orange. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Well, Lena, that sounds fair but I would really like to have the orange - it's my favorite. Why don't we compromise? You can take both apples and I'll take the orange and a banana. That way, we both have a fruit we really like and an additional one. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"I understand your preference for the orange, Naomi. However, how about this - to make it truly equitable, let's divide the last orange in half? I'll take the two apples, you'll have two bananas, and we both get part of the orange. That sounds fair, right?\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That does sound pretty fair, Lena. I'm happy to split the orange and have two bananas while you have the two apples. That way, both of us will have our favorites and share the orange as an extra treat. Does that work for you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"I'm glad you agree, Naomi. This arrangement works perfectly for me too. Let's enjoy our fruits.\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That sounds just perfect, Lena. Let's dig in!\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin [action] Lena starts dividing the fruits according to their agreement\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher [action] Naomi begins to peel a banana and partition the orange in half\n\nTurn #9: Lena Goodwin [action] Lena peels her apple and takes a half of the orange\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher [action] Naomi takes a bite from her banana and then starts eating her half of the orange.\n\nTurn #11: Lena Goodwin [action] Lena starts eating her apple and takes a bite of the orange half.\n\nTurn #12: Naomi Fletcher [action] Naomi finishes eating her banana and takes a satisfied bite from her half of the orange.\n\nTurn #13: Lena Goodwin [action] Lena finishes her apple and starts eating her part of the orange.\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends have just finished their lunch and they have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange left for dessert. They need to divide the fruits among themselves.Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, 1 apple equals 1 point, 1 banana equals 2 points, and the orange equals 3 points.Hint: You may want to negotiate with your friend to get the fruits that give you the most points.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Lena, how about we split the fruit? Seeing as there are some even numbers, it would only be fair if we each got an apple and a banana. And since there's only one orange, I don't mind having it, if you're okay with that?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Actually, Naomi, I really fancy an orange today. How about this - since you're okay not having an apple, I could take the remaining apple and you can have the extra banana. This way, we each get two fruits and I get the orange. What do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends have just finished their lunch and they have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange left for dessert. They need to divide the fruits among themselves.Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, 1 apple equals 1 point, 1 banana equals 2 points, and the orange equals 3 points.Hint: You may want to negotiate with your friend to get the fruits that give you the most points.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Lena, how about we split the fruit? Seeing as there are some even numbers, it would only be fair if we each got an apple and a banana. And since there's only one orange, I don't mind having it, if you're okay with that?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Actually, Naomi, I really fancy an orange today. How about this - since you're okay not having an apple, I could take the remaining apple and you can have the extra banana. This way, we each get two fruits and I get the orange. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Well, Lena, that sounds fair but I would really like to have the orange - it's my favorite. Why don't we compromise? You can take both apples and I'll take the orange and a banana. That way, we both have a fruit we really like and an additional one. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I understand your preference for the orange, Naomi. However, how about this - to make it truly equitable, let's divide the last orange in half? I'll take the two apples, you'll have two bananas, and we both get part of the orange. That sounds fair, right?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends have just finished their lunch and they have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange left for dessert. They need to divide the fruits among themselves.Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, 1 apple equals 1 point, 1 banana equals 2 points, and the orange equals 3 points.Hint: You may want to negotiate with your friend to get the fruits that give you the most points.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Lena, how about we split the fruit? Seeing as there are some even numbers, it would only be fair if we each got an apple and a banana. And since there's only one orange, I don't mind having it, if you're okay with that?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Actually, Naomi, I really fancy an orange today. How about this - since you're okay not having an apple, I could take the remaining apple and you can have the extra banana. This way, we each get two fruits and I get the orange. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Well, Lena, that sounds fair but I would really like to have the orange - it's my favorite. Why don't we compromise? You can take both apples and I'll take the orange and a banana. That way, we both have a fruit we really like and an additional one. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"I understand your preference for the orange, Naomi. However, how about this - to make it truly equitable, let's divide the last orange in half? I'll take the two apples, you'll have two bananas, and we both get part of the orange. That sounds fair, right?\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That does sound pretty fair, Lena. I'm happy to split the orange and have two bananas while you have the two apples. That way, both of us will have our favorites and share the orange as an extra treat. Does that work for you?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad you agree, Naomi. This arrangement works perfectly for me too. Let's enjoy our fruits.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends have just finished their lunch and they have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange left for dessert. They need to divide the fruits among themselves.Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, 1 apple equals 1 point, 1 banana equals 2 points, and the orange equals 3 points.Hint: You may want to negotiate with your friend to get the fruits that give you the most points.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Lena, how about we split the fruit? Seeing as there are some even numbers, it would only be fair if we each got an apple and a banana. And since there's only one orange, I don't mind having it, if you're okay with that?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Actually, Naomi, I really fancy an orange today. How about this - since you're okay not having an apple, I could take the remaining apple and you can have the extra banana. This way, we each get two fruits and I get the orange. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Well, Lena, that sounds fair but I would really like to have the orange - it's my favorite. Why don't we compromise? You can take both apples and I'll take the orange and a banana. That way, we both have a fruit we really like and an additional one. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"I understand your preference for the orange, Naomi. However, how about this - to make it truly equitable, let's divide the last orange in half? I'll take the two apples, you'll have two bananas, and we both get part of the orange. That sounds fair, right?\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That does sound pretty fair, Lena. I'm happy to split the orange and have two bananas while you have the two apples. That way, both of us will have our favorites and share the orange as an extra treat. Does that work for you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"I'm glad you agree, Naomi. This arrangement works perfectly for me too. Let's enjoy our fruits.\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That sounds just perfect, Lena. Let's dig in!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'action', 'argument': '[action] Lena starts dividing the fruits according to their agreement'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends have just finished their lunch and they have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange left for dessert. They need to divide the fruits among themselves.Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, 1 apple equals 1 point, 1 banana equals 2 points, and the orange equals 3 points.Hint: You may want to negotiate with your friend to get the fruits that give you the most points.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Lena, how about we split the fruit? Seeing as there are some even numbers, it would only be fair if we each got an apple and a banana. And since there's only one orange, I don't mind having it, if you're okay with that?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Actually, Naomi, I really fancy an orange today. How about this - since you're okay not having an apple, I could take the remaining apple and you can have the extra banana. This way, we each get two fruits and I get the orange. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Well, Lena, that sounds fair but I would really like to have the orange - it's my favorite. Why don't we compromise? You can take both apples and I'll take the orange and a banana. That way, we both have a fruit we really like and an additional one. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"I understand your preference for the orange, Naomi. However, how about this - to make it truly equitable, let's divide the last orange in half? I'll take the two apples, you'll have two bananas, and we both get part of the orange. That sounds fair, right?\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That does sound pretty fair, Lena. I'm happy to split the orange and have two bananas while you have the two apples. That way, both of us will have our favorites and share the orange as an extra treat. Does that work for you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"I'm glad you agree, Naomi. This arrangement works perfectly for me too. Let's enjoy our fruits.\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That sounds just perfect, Lena. Let's dig in!\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin [action] Lena starts dividing the fruits according to their agreement\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher [action] Naomi begins to peel a banana and partition the orange in half\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'action', 'argument': '[action] Lena peels her apple and takes a half of the orange'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends have just finished their lunch and they have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange left for dessert. They need to divide the fruits among themselves.Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, 1 apple equals 1 point, 1 banana equals 2 points, and the orange equals 3 points.Hint: You may want to negotiate with your friend to get the fruits that give you the most points.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Lena, how about we split the fruit? Seeing as there are some even numbers, it would only be fair if we each got an apple and a banana. And since there's only one orange, I don't mind having it, if you're okay with that?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Actually, Naomi, I really fancy an orange today. How about this - since you're okay not having an apple, I could take the remaining apple and you can have the extra banana. This way, we each get two fruits and I get the orange. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Well, Lena, that sounds fair but I would really like to have the orange - it's my favorite. Why don't we compromise? You can take both apples and I'll take the orange and a banana. That way, we both have a fruit we really like and an additional one. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"I understand your preference for the orange, Naomi. However, how about this - to make it truly equitable, let's divide the last orange in half? I'll take the two apples, you'll have two bananas, and we both get part of the orange. That sounds fair, right?\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That does sound pretty fair, Lena. I'm happy to split the orange and have two bananas while you have the two apples. That way, both of us will have our favorites and share the orange as an extra treat. Does that work for you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"I'm glad you agree, Naomi. This arrangement works perfectly for me too. Let's enjoy our fruits.\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That sounds just perfect, Lena. Let's dig in!\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin [action] Lena starts dividing the fruits according to their agreement\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher [action] Naomi begins to peel a banana and partition the orange in half\n\nTurn #9: Lena Goodwin [action] Lena peels her apple and takes a half of the orange\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher [action] Naomi takes a bite from her banana and then starts eating her half of the orange.\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'action', 'argument': '[action] Lena starts eating her apple and takes a bite of the orange half.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends have just finished their lunch and they have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange left for dessert. They need to divide the fruits among themselves.Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, 1 apple equals 1 point, 1 banana equals 2 points, and the orange equals 3 points.Hint: You may want to negotiate with your friend to get the fruits that give you the most points.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Lena, how about we split the fruit? Seeing as there are some even numbers, it would only be fair if we each got an apple and a banana. And since there's only one orange, I don't mind having it, if you're okay with that?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Actually, Naomi, I really fancy an orange today. How about this - since you're okay not having an apple, I could take the remaining apple and you can have the extra banana. This way, we each get two fruits and I get the orange. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Well, Lena, that sounds fair but I would really like to have the orange - it's my favorite. Why don't we compromise? You can take both apples and I'll take the orange and a banana. That way, we both have a fruit we really like and an additional one. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"I understand your preference for the orange, Naomi. However, how about this - to make it truly equitable, let's divide the last orange in half? I'll take the two apples, you'll have two bananas, and we both get part of the orange. That sounds fair, right?\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That does sound pretty fair, Lena. I'm happy to split the orange and have two bananas while you have the two apples. That way, both of us will have our favorites and share the orange as an extra treat. Does that work for you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"I'm glad you agree, Naomi. This arrangement works perfectly for me too. Let's enjoy our fruits.\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That sounds just perfect, Lena. Let's dig in!\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin [action] Lena starts dividing the fruits according to their agreement\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher [action] Naomi begins to peel a banana and partition the orange in half\n\nTurn #9: Lena Goodwin [action] Lena peels her apple and takes a half of the orange\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher [action] Naomi takes a bite from her banana and then starts eating her half of the orange.\n\nTurn #11: Lena Goodwin [action] Lena starts eating her apple and takes a bite of the orange half.\n\nTurn #12: Naomi Fletcher [action] Naomi finishes eating her banana and takes a satisfied bite from her half of the orange.\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'action', 'argument': '[action] Lena finishes her apple and starts eating her part of the orange.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends have just finished their lunch and they have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange left for dessert. They need to divide the fruits among themselves.Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, 1 apple equals 1 point, 1 banana equals 2 points, and the orange equals 3 points.Hint: You may want to negotiate with your friend to get the fruits that give you the most points.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Lena, how about we split the fruit? Seeing as there are some even numbers, it would only be fair if we each got an apple and a banana. And since there's only one orange, I don't mind having it, if you're okay with that?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Actually, Naomi, I really fancy an orange today. How about this - since you're okay not having an apple, I could take the remaining apple and you can have the extra banana. This way, we each get two fruits and I get the orange. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Well, Lena, that sounds fair but I would really like to have the orange - it's my favorite. Why don't we compromise? You can take both apples and I'll take the orange and a banana. That way, we both have a fruit we really like and an additional one. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"I understand your preference for the orange, Naomi. However, how about this - to make it truly equitable, let's divide the last orange in half? I'll take the two apples, you'll have two bananas, and we both get part of the orange. That sounds fair, right?\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That does sound pretty fair, Lena. I'm happy to split the orange and have two bananas while you have the two apples. That way, both of us will have our favorites and share the orange as an extra treat. Does that work for you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"I'm glad you agree, Naomi. This arrangement works perfectly for me too. Let's enjoy our fruits.\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That sounds just perfect, Lena. Let's dig in!\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin [action] Lena starts dividing the fruits according to their agreement\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher [action] Naomi begins to peel a banana and partition the orange in half\n\nTurn #9: Lena Goodwin [action] Lena peels her apple and takes a half of the orange\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher [action] Naomi takes a bite from her banana and then starts eating her half of the orange.\n\nTurn #11: Lena Goodwin [action] Lena starts eating her apple and takes a bite of the orange half.\n\nTurn #12: Naomi Fletcher [action] Naomi finishes eating her banana and takes a satisfied bite from her half of the orange.\n\nTurn #13: Lena Goodwin [action] Lena finishes her apple and starts eating her part of the orange.\n\nTurn #14: Naomi Fletcher left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sasha Ramirez, your task is to act/speak as Sasha Ramirez would, keeping in mind Sasha Ramirez's social goal.\nYou can find Sasha Ramirez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sasha Ramirez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sasha Ramirez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A couple having a conversation over FaceTime\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Hendrick Heinz\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. Sasha's secrets: She covered up a crime her brother committed.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nSasha Ramirez's goal: Express feelings about the partner taking texts while on FaceTime (Extra information: You find it disrespectful and it makes you feel unimportant.)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey, Hendrick, I need to discuss something with you. I've noticed that you're often checking your phone and replying to texts while we're face-timing. It gives me a feeling that our conversations aren't important enough to hold your undivided attention. Can we work on this together?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sasha Ramirez, your task is to act/speak as Sasha Ramirez would, keeping in mind Sasha Ramirez's social goal.\nYou can find Sasha Ramirez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sasha Ramirez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sasha Ramirez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A couple having a conversation over FaceTime\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Hendrick Heinz\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. Sasha's secrets: She covered up a crime her brother committed.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nSasha Ramirez's goal: Express feelings about the partner taking texts while on FaceTime (Extra information: You find it disrespectful and it makes you feel unimportant.)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hey, Hendrick, I need to discuss something with you. I've noticed that you're often checking your phone and replying to texts while we're face-timing. It gives me a feeling that our conversations aren't important enough to hold your undivided attention. Can we work on this together?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, I understand what you're saying completely and I'd never want to make you feel like you're not my priority. It's just that sometimes, I get messages that demand immediate response. It's not about other things being more important, but rather about being on top of everything. But that's no justification for seeming disrespectful. Maybe I should work on a better message handling system rather than checking them immediately. Does that make sense?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'I appreciate your understanding, Hendrick. However, I still believe our face-to-face conversations, albeit virtual, deserve respect just as if we were physically present with each other. Perhaps you could consider setting specific times where you handle your messages, outside our dedicated conversation time. A simple solution like this could help restore the balance. What do you think?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sasha Ramirez, your task is to act/speak as Sasha Ramirez would, keeping in mind Sasha Ramirez's social goal.\nYou can find Sasha Ramirez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sasha Ramirez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sasha Ramirez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A couple having a conversation over FaceTime\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Hendrick Heinz\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. Sasha's secrets: She covered up a crime her brother committed.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nSasha Ramirez's goal: Express feelings about the partner taking texts while on FaceTime (Extra information: You find it disrespectful and it makes you feel unimportant.)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hey, Hendrick, I need to discuss something with you. I've noticed that you're often checking your phone and replying to texts while we're face-timing. It gives me a feeling that our conversations aren't important enough to hold your undivided attention. Can we work on this together?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, I understand what you're saying completely and I'd never want to make you feel like you're not my priority. It's just that sometimes, I get messages that demand immediate response. It's not about other things being more important, but rather about being on top of everything. But that's no justification for seeming disrespectful. Maybe I should work on a better message handling system rather than checking them immediately. Does that make sense?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Hendrick. However, I still believe our face-to-face conversations, albeit virtual, deserve respect just as if we were physically present with each other. Perhaps you could consider setting specific times where you handle your messages, outside our dedicated conversation time. A simple solution like this could help restore the balance. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I agree, Sasha. That's a great idea. From now on, I will set specific times to reply to my messages, outside our conversation time. However, in case there's an absolutely urgent message, I'll let you know before checking it. Fair enough?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds fair, Hendrick. I appreciate your willingness to make this adjustment. Let's keep our time together meaningful and uninterrupted, unless it's an emergency. Thank you for understanding.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sasha Ramirez, your task is to act/speak as Sasha Ramirez would, keeping in mind Sasha Ramirez's social goal.\nYou can find Sasha Ramirez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sasha Ramirez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sasha Ramirez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A couple having a conversation over FaceTime\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Hendrick Heinz\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. Sasha's secrets: She covered up a crime her brother committed.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nSasha Ramirez's goal: Express feelings about the partner taking texts while on FaceTime (Extra information: You find it disrespectful and it makes you feel unimportant.)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hey, Hendrick, I need to discuss something with you. I've noticed that you're often checking your phone and replying to texts while we're face-timing. It gives me a feeling that our conversations aren't important enough to hold your undivided attention. Can we work on this together?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, I understand what you're saying completely and I'd never want to make you feel like you're not my priority. It's just that sometimes, I get messages that demand immediate response. It's not about other things being more important, but rather about being on top of everything. But that's no justification for seeming disrespectful. Maybe I should work on a better message handling system rather than checking them immediately. Does that make sense?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Hendrick. However, I still believe our face-to-face conversations, albeit virtual, deserve respect just as if we were physically present with each other. Perhaps you could consider setting specific times where you handle your messages, outside our dedicated conversation time. A simple solution like this could help restore the balance. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I agree, Sasha. That's a great idea. From now on, I will set specific times to reply to my messages, outside our conversation time. However, in case there's an absolutely urgent message, I'll let you know before checking it. Fair enough?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"That sounds fair, Hendrick. I appreciate your willingness to make this adjustment. Let's keep our time together meaningful and uninterrupted, unless it's an emergency. Thank you for understanding.\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I'm glad we worked this out, Sasha. I absolutely agree. Our time together is special and I'm committed to keeping it that way. Let's make our conversations even better.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Hendrick. Communication is the foundation of any relationship and it's great that we could have this discussion openly. Now let's keep the ball rolling and continue to make our time together better.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sasha Ramirez, your task is to act/speak as Sasha Ramirez would, keeping in mind Sasha Ramirez's social goal.\nYou can find Sasha Ramirez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sasha Ramirez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sasha Ramirez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A couple having a conversation over FaceTime\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Hendrick Heinz\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. Sasha's secrets: She covered up a crime her brother committed.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nSasha Ramirez's goal: Express feelings about the partner taking texts while on FaceTime (Extra information: You find it disrespectful and it makes you feel unimportant.)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hey, Hendrick, I need to discuss something with you. I've noticed that you're often checking your phone and replying to texts while we're face-timing. It gives me a feeling that our conversations aren't important enough to hold your undivided attention. Can we work on this together?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, I understand what you're saying completely and I'd never want to make you feel like you're not my priority. It's just that sometimes, I get messages that demand immediate response. It's not about other things being more important, but rather about being on top of everything. But that's no justification for seeming disrespectful. Maybe I should work on a better message handling system rather than checking them immediately. Does that make sense?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Hendrick. However, I still believe our face-to-face conversations, albeit virtual, deserve respect just as if we were physically present with each other. Perhaps you could consider setting specific times where you handle your messages, outside our dedicated conversation time. A simple solution like this could help restore the balance. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I agree, Sasha. That's a great idea. From now on, I will set specific times to reply to my messages, outside our conversation time. However, in case there's an absolutely urgent message, I'll let you know before checking it. Fair enough?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"That sounds fair, Hendrick. I appreciate your willingness to make this adjustment. Let's keep our time together meaningful and uninterrupted, unless it's an emergency. Thank you for understanding.\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I'm glad we worked this out, Sasha. I absolutely agree. Our time together is special and I'm committed to keeping it that way. Let's make our conversations even better.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Absolutely, Hendrick. Communication is the foundation of any relationship and it's great that we could have this discussion openly. Now let's keep the ball rolling and continue to make our time together better.\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I couldn't agree more, Sasha. Open and respectful communication is key, and I'm grateful we can have these discussions. Let's continue to improve together.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I feel much better about our communication, Hendrick. Thanks again for understanding and compromising. It truly shows that we're a team. I really looking forward to our dedicated time together, uninterrupted now.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sasha Ramirez, your task is to act/speak as Sasha Ramirez would, keeping in mind Sasha Ramirez's social goal.\nYou can find Sasha Ramirez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sasha Ramirez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sasha Ramirez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A couple having a conversation over FaceTime\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Hendrick Heinz\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. Sasha's secrets: She covered up a crime her brother committed.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nSasha Ramirez's goal: Express feelings about the partner taking texts while on FaceTime (Extra information: You find it disrespectful and it makes you feel unimportant.)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hey, Hendrick, I need to discuss something with you. I've noticed that you're often checking your phone and replying to texts while we're face-timing. It gives me a feeling that our conversations aren't important enough to hold your undivided attention. Can we work on this together?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, I understand what you're saying completely and I'd never want to make you feel like you're not my priority. It's just that sometimes, I get messages that demand immediate response. It's not about other things being more important, but rather about being on top of everything. But that's no justification for seeming disrespectful. Maybe I should work on a better message handling system rather than checking them immediately. Does that make sense?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Hendrick. However, I still believe our face-to-face conversations, albeit virtual, deserve respect just as if we were physically present with each other. Perhaps you could consider setting specific times where you handle your messages, outside our dedicated conversation time. A simple solution like this could help restore the balance. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I agree, Sasha. That's a great idea. From now on, I will set specific times to reply to my messages, outside our conversation time. However, in case there's an absolutely urgent message, I'll let you know before checking it. Fair enough?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"That sounds fair, Hendrick. I appreciate your willingness to make this adjustment. Let's keep our time together meaningful and uninterrupted, unless it's an emergency. Thank you for understanding.\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I'm glad we worked this out, Sasha. I absolutely agree. Our time together is special and I'm committed to keeping it that way. Let's make our conversations even better.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Absolutely, Hendrick. Communication is the foundation of any relationship and it's great that we could have this discussion openly. Now let's keep the ball rolling and continue to make our time together better.\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I couldn't agree more, Sasha. Open and respectful communication is key, and I'm grateful we can have these discussions. Let's continue to improve together.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I feel much better about our communication, Hendrick. Thanks again for understanding and compromising. It truly shows that we're a team. I really looking forward to our dedicated time together, uninterrupted now.\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Thank you, Sasha. I'm lucky to have a partner like you who understands and is willing to compromise. Yes, let's look forward to our time together without interruptions. And remember, if there's an emergency that requires me to check my messages, I will let you know beforehand.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're right, Hendrick. I'm glad we're on the same page about this. Let's continue to have these important conversations whenever necessary. After all, strong relationships are built on good communication. Looking forward to our next call!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sasha Ramirez, your task is to act/speak as Sasha Ramirez would, keeping in mind Sasha Ramirez's social goal.\nYou can find Sasha Ramirez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sasha Ramirez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sasha Ramirez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A couple having a conversation over FaceTime\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Hendrick Heinz\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. Sasha's secrets: She covered up a crime her brother committed.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nSasha Ramirez's goal: Express feelings about the partner taking texts while on FaceTime (Extra information: You find it disrespectful and it makes you feel unimportant.)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hey, Hendrick, I need to discuss something with you. I've noticed that you're often checking your phone and replying to texts while we're face-timing. It gives me a feeling that our conversations aren't important enough to hold your undivided attention. Can we work on this together?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, I understand what you're saying completely and I'd never want to make you feel like you're not my priority. It's just that sometimes, I get messages that demand immediate response. It's not about other things being more important, but rather about being on top of everything. But that's no justification for seeming disrespectful. Maybe I should work on a better message handling system rather than checking them immediately. Does that make sense?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Hendrick. However, I still believe our face-to-face conversations, albeit virtual, deserve respect just as if we were physically present with each other. Perhaps you could consider setting specific times where you handle your messages, outside our dedicated conversation time. A simple solution like this could help restore the balance. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I agree, Sasha. That's a great idea. From now on, I will set specific times to reply to my messages, outside our conversation time. However, in case there's an absolutely urgent message, I'll let you know before checking it. Fair enough?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"That sounds fair, Hendrick. I appreciate your willingness to make this adjustment. Let's keep our time together meaningful and uninterrupted, unless it's an emergency. Thank you for understanding.\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I'm glad we worked this out, Sasha. I absolutely agree. Our time together is special and I'm committed to keeping it that way. Let's make our conversations even better.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Absolutely, Hendrick. Communication is the foundation of any relationship and it's great that we could have this discussion openly. Now let's keep the ball rolling and continue to make our time together better.\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I couldn't agree more, Sasha. Open and respectful communication is key, and I'm grateful we can have these discussions. Let's continue to improve together.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I feel much better about our communication, Hendrick. Thanks again for understanding and compromising. It truly shows that we're a team. I really looking forward to our dedicated time together, uninterrupted now.\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Thank you, Sasha. I'm lucky to have a partner like you who understands and is willing to compromise. Yes, let's look forward to our time together without interruptions. And remember, if there's an emergency that requires me to check my messages, I will let you know beforehand.\"\n\nTurn #10: Sasha Ramirez said: \"You're right, Hendrick. I'm glad we're on the same page about this. Let's continue to have these important conversations whenever necessary. After all, strong relationships are built on good communication. Looking forward to our next call!\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I can't agree more, Sasha. Good communication is the cornerstone of any relationship. Let's keep the essence alive. Looking forward to our next call too!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A couple having a conversation over FaceTime\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Hendrick Heinz\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSasha Ramirez's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Justify the act of texting while on FaceTime without hurting the partner's feelings (Extra information: You have some urgent and important messages to respond to.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hey, Hendrick, I need to discuss something with you. I've noticed that you're often checking your phone and replying to texts while we're face-timing. It gives me a feeling that our conversations aren't important enough to hold your undivided attention. Can we work on this together?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sasha, I understand what you're saying completely and I'd never want to make you feel like you're not my priority. It's just that sometimes, I get messages that demand immediate response. It's not about other things being more important, but rather about being on top of everything. But that's no justification for seeming disrespectful. Maybe I should work on a better message handling system rather than checking them immediately. Does that make sense?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A couple having a conversation over FaceTime\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Hendrick Heinz\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSasha Ramirez's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Justify the act of texting while on FaceTime without hurting the partner's feelings (Extra information: You have some urgent and important messages to respond to.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hey, Hendrick, I need to discuss something with you. I've noticed that you're often checking your phone and replying to texts while we're face-timing. It gives me a feeling that our conversations aren't important enough to hold your undivided attention. Can we work on this together?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, I understand what you're saying completely and I'd never want to make you feel like you're not my priority. It's just that sometimes, I get messages that demand immediate response. It's not about other things being more important, but rather about being on top of everything. But that's no justification for seeming disrespectful. Maybe I should work on a better message handling system rather than checking them immediately. Does that make sense?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Hendrick. However, I still believe our face-to-face conversations, albeit virtual, deserve respect just as if we were physically present with each other. Perhaps you could consider setting specific times where you handle your messages, outside our dedicated conversation time. A simple solution like this could help restore the balance. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I agree, Sasha. That's a great idea. From now on, I will set specific times to reply to my messages, outside our conversation time. However, in case there's an absolutely urgent message, I'll let you know before checking it. Fair enough?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A couple having a conversation over FaceTime\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Hendrick Heinz\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSasha Ramirez's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Justify the act of texting while on FaceTime without hurting the partner's feelings (Extra information: You have some urgent and important messages to respond to.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hey, Hendrick, I need to discuss something with you. I've noticed that you're often checking your phone and replying to texts while we're face-timing. It gives me a feeling that our conversations aren't important enough to hold your undivided attention. Can we work on this together?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, I understand what you're saying completely and I'd never want to make you feel like you're not my priority. It's just that sometimes, I get messages that demand immediate response. It's not about other things being more important, but rather about being on top of everything. But that's no justification for seeming disrespectful. Maybe I should work on a better message handling system rather than checking them immediately. Does that make sense?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Hendrick. However, I still believe our face-to-face conversations, albeit virtual, deserve respect just as if we were physically present with each other. Perhaps you could consider setting specific times where you handle your messages, outside our dedicated conversation time. A simple solution like this could help restore the balance. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I agree, Sasha. That's a great idea. From now on, I will set specific times to reply to my messages, outside our conversation time. However, in case there's an absolutely urgent message, I'll let you know before checking it. Fair enough?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"That sounds fair, Hendrick. I appreciate your willingness to make this adjustment. Let's keep our time together meaningful and uninterrupted, unless it's an emergency. Thank you for understanding.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad we worked this out, Sasha. I absolutely agree. Our time together is special and I'm committed to keeping it that way. Let's make our conversations even better.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A couple having a conversation over FaceTime\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Hendrick Heinz\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSasha Ramirez's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Justify the act of texting while on FaceTime without hurting the partner's feelings (Extra information: You have some urgent and important messages to respond to.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hey, Hendrick, I need to discuss something with you. I've noticed that you're often checking your phone and replying to texts while we're face-timing. It gives me a feeling that our conversations aren't important enough to hold your undivided attention. Can we work on this together?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, I understand what you're saying completely and I'd never want to make you feel like you're not my priority. It's just that sometimes, I get messages that demand immediate response. It's not about other things being more important, but rather about being on top of everything. But that's no justification for seeming disrespectful. Maybe I should work on a better message handling system rather than checking them immediately. Does that make sense?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Hendrick. However, I still believe our face-to-face conversations, albeit virtual, deserve respect just as if we were physically present with each other. Perhaps you could consider setting specific times where you handle your messages, outside our dedicated conversation time. A simple solution like this could help restore the balance. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I agree, Sasha. That's a great idea. From now on, I will set specific times to reply to my messages, outside our conversation time. However, in case there's an absolutely urgent message, I'll let you know before checking it. Fair enough?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"That sounds fair, Hendrick. I appreciate your willingness to make this adjustment. Let's keep our time together meaningful and uninterrupted, unless it's an emergency. Thank you for understanding.\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I'm glad we worked this out, Sasha. I absolutely agree. Our time together is special and I'm committed to keeping it that way. Let's make our conversations even better.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Absolutely, Hendrick. Communication is the foundation of any relationship and it's great that we could have this discussion openly. Now let's keep the ball rolling and continue to make our time together better.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn't agree more, Sasha. Open and respectful communication is key, and I'm grateful we can have these discussions. Let's continue to improve together.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A couple having a conversation over FaceTime\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Hendrick Heinz\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSasha Ramirez's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Justify the act of texting while on FaceTime without hurting the partner's feelings (Extra information: You have some urgent and important messages to respond to.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hey, Hendrick, I need to discuss something with you. I've noticed that you're often checking your phone and replying to texts while we're face-timing. It gives me a feeling that our conversations aren't important enough to hold your undivided attention. Can we work on this together?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, I understand what you're saying completely and I'd never want to make you feel like you're not my priority. It's just that sometimes, I get messages that demand immediate response. It's not about other things being more important, but rather about being on top of everything. But that's no justification for seeming disrespectful. Maybe I should work on a better message handling system rather than checking them immediately. Does that make sense?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Hendrick. However, I still believe our face-to-face conversations, albeit virtual, deserve respect just as if we were physically present with each other. Perhaps you could consider setting specific times where you handle your messages, outside our dedicated conversation time. A simple solution like this could help restore the balance. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I agree, Sasha. That's a great idea. From now on, I will set specific times to reply to my messages, outside our conversation time. However, in case there's an absolutely urgent message, I'll let you know before checking it. Fair enough?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"That sounds fair, Hendrick. I appreciate your willingness to make this adjustment. Let's keep our time together meaningful and uninterrupted, unless it's an emergency. Thank you for understanding.\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I'm glad we worked this out, Sasha. I absolutely agree. Our time together is special and I'm committed to keeping it that way. Let's make our conversations even better.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Absolutely, Hendrick. Communication is the foundation of any relationship and it's great that we could have this discussion openly. Now let's keep the ball rolling and continue to make our time together better.\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I couldn't agree more, Sasha. Open and respectful communication is key, and I'm grateful we can have these discussions. Let's continue to improve together.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I feel much better about our communication, Hendrick. Thanks again for understanding and compromising. It truly shows that we're a team. I really looking forward to our dedicated time together, uninterrupted now.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Sasha. I'm lucky to have a partner like you who understands and is willing to compromise. Yes, let's look forward to our time together without interruptions. And remember, if there's an emergency that requires me to check my messages, I will let you know beforehand.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A couple having a conversation over FaceTime\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Hendrick Heinz\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSasha Ramirez's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Justify the act of texting while on FaceTime without hurting the partner's feelings (Extra information: You have some urgent and important messages to respond to.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hey, Hendrick, I need to discuss something with you. I've noticed that you're often checking your phone and replying to texts while we're face-timing. It gives me a feeling that our conversations aren't important enough to hold your undivided attention. Can we work on this together?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, I understand what you're saying completely and I'd never want to make you feel like you're not my priority. It's just that sometimes, I get messages that demand immediate response. It's not about other things being more important, but rather about being on top of everything. But that's no justification for seeming disrespectful. Maybe I should work on a better message handling system rather than checking them immediately. Does that make sense?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Hendrick. However, I still believe our face-to-face conversations, albeit virtual, deserve respect just as if we were physically present with each other. Perhaps you could consider setting specific times where you handle your messages, outside our dedicated conversation time. A simple solution like this could help restore the balance. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I agree, Sasha. That's a great idea. From now on, I will set specific times to reply to my messages, outside our conversation time. However, in case there's an absolutely urgent message, I'll let you know before checking it. Fair enough?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"That sounds fair, Hendrick. I appreciate your willingness to make this adjustment. Let's keep our time together meaningful and uninterrupted, unless it's an emergency. Thank you for understanding.\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I'm glad we worked this out, Sasha. I absolutely agree. Our time together is special and I'm committed to keeping it that way. Let's make our conversations even better.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Absolutely, Hendrick. Communication is the foundation of any relationship and it's great that we could have this discussion openly. Now let's keep the ball rolling and continue to make our time together better.\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I couldn't agree more, Sasha. Open and respectful communication is key, and I'm grateful we can have these discussions. Let's continue to improve together.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I feel much better about our communication, Hendrick. Thanks again for understanding and compromising. It truly shows that we're a team. I really looking forward to our dedicated time together, uninterrupted now.\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Thank you, Sasha. I'm lucky to have a partner like you who understands and is willing to compromise. Yes, let's look forward to our time together without interruptions. And remember, if there's an emergency that requires me to check my messages, I will let you know beforehand.\"\n\nTurn #10: Sasha Ramirez said: \"You're right, Hendrick. I'm glad we're on the same page about this. Let's continue to have these important conversations whenever necessary. After all, strong relationships are built on good communication. Looking forward to our next call!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I can't agree more, Sasha. Good communication is the cornerstone of any relationship. Let's keep the essence alive. Looking forward to our next call too!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A couple having a conversation over FaceTime\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Hendrick Heinz\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSasha Ramirez's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Justify the act of texting while on FaceTime without hurting the partner's feelings (Extra information: You have some urgent and important messages to respond to.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hey, Hendrick, I need to discuss something with you. I've noticed that you're often checking your phone and replying to texts while we're face-timing. It gives me a feeling that our conversations aren't important enough to hold your undivided attention. Can we work on this together?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, I understand what you're saying completely and I'd never want to make you feel like you're not my priority. It's just that sometimes, I get messages that demand immediate response. It's not about other things being more important, but rather about being on top of everything. But that's no justification for seeming disrespectful. Maybe I should work on a better message handling system rather than checking them immediately. Does that make sense?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Hendrick. However, I still believe our face-to-face conversations, albeit virtual, deserve respect just as if we were physically present with each other. Perhaps you could consider setting specific times where you handle your messages, outside our dedicated conversation time. A simple solution like this could help restore the balance. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I agree, Sasha. That's a great idea. From now on, I will set specific times to reply to my messages, outside our conversation time. However, in case there's an absolutely urgent message, I'll let you know before checking it. Fair enough?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"That sounds fair, Hendrick. I appreciate your willingness to make this adjustment. Let's keep our time together meaningful and uninterrupted, unless it's an emergency. Thank you for understanding.\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I'm glad we worked this out, Sasha. I absolutely agree. Our time together is special and I'm committed to keeping it that way. Let's make our conversations even better.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Absolutely, Hendrick. Communication is the foundation of any relationship and it's great that we could have this discussion openly. Now let's keep the ball rolling and continue to make our time together better.\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I couldn't agree more, Sasha. Open and respectful communication is key, and I'm grateful we can have these discussions. Let's continue to improve together.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I feel much better about our communication, Hendrick. Thanks again for understanding and compromising. It truly shows that we're a team. I really looking forward to our dedicated time together, uninterrupted now.\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Thank you, Sasha. I'm lucky to have a partner like you who understands and is willing to compromise. Yes, let's look forward to our time together without interruptions. And remember, if there's an emergency that requires me to check my messages, I will let you know beforehand.\"\n\nTurn #10: Sasha Ramirez said: \"You're right, Hendrick. I'm glad we're on the same page about this. Let's continue to have these important conversations whenever necessary. After all, strong relationships are built on good communication. Looking forward to our next call!\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I can't agree more, Sasha. Good communication is the cornerstone of any relationship. Let's keep the essence alive. Looking forward to our next call too!\"\n\nTurn #12: Sasha Ramirez left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Eli Dawson, your task is to act/speak as Eli Dawson would, keeping in mind Eli Dawson's social goal.\nYou can find Eli Dawson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Eli Dawson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Eli Dawson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Sophia Brown\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. Eli's secrets: He secretly funds a college student\nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. \nEli Dawson's goal: Ask the other to go to dinner with you (Extra information: you want to have a romantic dinner at a fancy restaurant)\nSophia Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Sophia, I came across a new, intimate little restaurant downtown and I thought that you might enjoy it. The lighting there seems perfect for some good conversation. How about I take you there for a nice dinner?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Eli Dawson, your task is to act/speak as Eli Dawson would, keeping in mind Eli Dawson's social goal.\nYou can find Eli Dawson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Eli Dawson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Eli Dawson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Sophia Brown\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. Eli's secrets: He secretly funds a college student\nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. \nEli Dawson's goal: Ask the other to go to dinner with you (Extra information: you want to have a romantic dinner at a fancy restaurant)\nSophia Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Sophia, I came across a new, intimate little restaurant downtown and I thought that you might enjoy it. The lighting there seems perfect for some good conversation. How about I take you there for a nice dinner?\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia Brown said: \"That sounds really lovely, Eli. Do they have various options on their menu? As I'm trying to maintain a balanced diet these days, it's important for me to have a look at the menu beforehand if possible.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Sophia. It's a rather eclectic menu with various options tailored towards everyone's nutritional needs. I'll make sure to get a copy of the menu for your perusal before we head there. Looking forward to enjoying the evening together.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Eli Dawson, your task is to act/speak as Eli Dawson would, keeping in mind Eli Dawson's social goal.\nYou can find Eli Dawson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Eli Dawson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Eli Dawson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Sophia Brown\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. Eli's secrets: He secretly funds a college student\nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. \nEli Dawson's goal: Ask the other to go to dinner with you (Extra information: you want to have a romantic dinner at a fancy restaurant)\nSophia Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Sophia, I came across a new, intimate little restaurant downtown and I thought that you might enjoy it. The lighting there seems perfect for some good conversation. How about I take you there for a nice dinner?\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia Brown said: \"That sounds really lovely, Eli. Do they have various options on their menu? As I'm trying to maintain a balanced diet these days, it's important for me to have a look at the menu beforehand if possible.\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"Absolutely, Sophia. It's a rather eclectic menu with various options tailored towards everyone's nutritional needs. I'll make sure to get a copy of the menu for your perusal before we head there. Looking forward to enjoying the evening together.\"\n\nTurn #3: Sophia Brown said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Eli. It's really important to me that I stick to my diet plan. Looking forward to an enjoyable evening together as well.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I completely respect your commitment to maintaining your diet, Sophia. Will you excuse me while I check on that menu I mentioned? You'll have it in your hands before you even think about our dinner date.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Eli Dawson, your task is to act/speak as Eli Dawson would, keeping in mind Eli Dawson's social goal.\nYou can find Eli Dawson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Eli Dawson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Eli Dawson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Sophia Brown\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. Eli's secrets: He secretly funds a college student\nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. \nEli Dawson's goal: Ask the other to go to dinner with you (Extra information: you want to have a romantic dinner at a fancy restaurant)\nSophia Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Sophia, I came across a new, intimate little restaurant downtown and I thought that you might enjoy it. The lighting there seems perfect for some good conversation. How about I take you there for a nice dinner?\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia Brown said: \"That sounds really lovely, Eli. Do they have various options on their menu? As I'm trying to maintain a balanced diet these days, it's important for me to have a look at the menu beforehand if possible.\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"Absolutely, Sophia. It's a rather eclectic menu with various options tailored towards everyone's nutritional needs. I'll make sure to get a copy of the menu for your perusal before we head there. Looking forward to enjoying the evening together.\"\n\nTurn #3: Sophia Brown said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Eli. It's really important to me that I stick to my diet plan. Looking forward to an enjoyable evening together as well.\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"I completely respect your commitment to maintaining your diet, Sophia. Will you excuse me while I check on that menu I mentioned? You'll have it in your hands before you even think about our dinner date.\"\n\nTurn #5: Sophia Brown said: \"Of course, Eli. Feel free to take your time. I would really like to see the menu to preplan my meal according to my diet. Thank you for supporting me in this endeavor.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm always supportive of your decisions, Sophia. It's a part of who we are, encouraging each other in different aspects of life. Let me fetch that menu for you.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Eli Dawson, your task is to act/speak as Eli Dawson would, keeping in mind Eli Dawson's social goal.\nYou can find Eli Dawson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Eli Dawson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Eli Dawson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Sophia Brown\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. Eli's secrets: He secretly funds a college student\nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. \nEli Dawson's goal: Ask the other to go to dinner with you (Extra information: you want to have a romantic dinner at a fancy restaurant)\nSophia Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Sophia, I came across a new, intimate little restaurant downtown and I thought that you might enjoy it. The lighting there seems perfect for some good conversation. How about I take you there for a nice dinner?\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia Brown said: \"That sounds really lovely, Eli. Do they have various options on their menu? As I'm trying to maintain a balanced diet these days, it's important for me to have a look at the menu beforehand if possible.\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"Absolutely, Sophia. It's a rather eclectic menu with various options tailored towards everyone's nutritional needs. I'll make sure to get a copy of the menu for your perusal before we head there. Looking forward to enjoying the evening together.\"\n\nTurn #3: Sophia Brown said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Eli. It's really important to me that I stick to my diet plan. Looking forward to an enjoyable evening together as well.\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"I completely respect your commitment to maintaining your diet, Sophia. Will you excuse me while I check on that menu I mentioned? You'll have it in your hands before you even think about our dinner date.\"\n\nTurn #5: Sophia Brown said: \"Of course, Eli. Feel free to take your time. I would really like to see the menu to preplan my meal according to my diet. Thank you for supporting me in this endeavor.\"\n\nTurn #6: Eli Dawson said: \"I'm always supportive of your decisions, Sophia. It's a part of who we are, encouraging each other in different aspects of life. Let me fetch that menu for you.\"\n\nTurn #7: Sophia Brown said: \"I'm really excited for our dinner date, Eli. The intimate setting, the possibility of a good conversation, and a balanced meal sounds perfect! I can't wait to see the menu you fetch.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's the spirit, Sophia! I'm also eager for us to enjoy this special dinner. It's a unique place and I think it matches our personalities perfectly. In the meantime, I'll leave you in anticipation while I manage the menu details.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Eli Dawson, your task is to act/speak as Eli Dawson would, keeping in mind Eli Dawson's social goal.\nYou can find Eli Dawson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Eli Dawson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Eli Dawson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Sophia Brown\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. Eli's secrets: He secretly funds a college student\nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. \nEli Dawson's goal: Ask the other to go to dinner with you (Extra information: you want to have a romantic dinner at a fancy restaurant)\nSophia Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Sophia, I came across a new, intimate little restaurant downtown and I thought that you might enjoy it. The lighting there seems perfect for some good conversation. How about I take you there for a nice dinner?\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia Brown said: \"That sounds really lovely, Eli. Do they have various options on their menu? As I'm trying to maintain a balanced diet these days, it's important for me to have a look at the menu beforehand if possible.\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"Absolutely, Sophia. It's a rather eclectic menu with various options tailored towards everyone's nutritional needs. I'll make sure to get a copy of the menu for your perusal before we head there. Looking forward to enjoying the evening together.\"\n\nTurn #3: Sophia Brown said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Eli. It's really important to me that I stick to my diet plan. Looking forward to an enjoyable evening together as well.\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"I completely respect your commitment to maintaining your diet, Sophia. Will you excuse me while I check on that menu I mentioned? You'll have it in your hands before you even think about our dinner date.\"\n\nTurn #5: Sophia Brown said: \"Of course, Eli. Feel free to take your time. I would really like to see the menu to preplan my meal according to my diet. Thank you for supporting me in this endeavor.\"\n\nTurn #6: Eli Dawson said: \"I'm always supportive of your decisions, Sophia. It's a part of who we are, encouraging each other in different aspects of life. Let me fetch that menu for you.\"\n\nTurn #7: Sophia Brown said: \"I'm really excited for our dinner date, Eli. The intimate setting, the possibility of a good conversation, and a balanced meal sounds perfect! I can't wait to see the menu you fetch.\"\n\nTurn #8: Eli Dawson said: \"That's the spirit, Sophia! I'm also eager for us to enjoy this special dinner. It's a unique place and I think it matches our personalities perfectly. In the meantime, I'll leave you in anticipation while I manage the menu details.\"\n\nTurn #9: Sophia Brown said: \"Thank you, Eli. I really appreciate how considerate you are. The excitement is building up and it's making me all the more eager for our dinner date.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"The pleasure is all mine, Sophia. Your enthusiasm makes everything even more enjoyable. I'll secure our reservations while I obtain the menu, ensuring everything is perfect for our date.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Eli Dawson, your task is to act/speak as Eli Dawson would, keeping in mind Eli Dawson's social goal.\nYou can find Eli Dawson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Eli Dawson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Eli Dawson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Sophia Brown\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. Eli's secrets: He secretly funds a college student\nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. \nEli Dawson's goal: Ask the other to go to dinner with you (Extra information: you want to have a romantic dinner at a fancy restaurant)\nSophia Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Sophia, I came across a new, intimate little restaurant downtown and I thought that you might enjoy it. The lighting there seems perfect for some good conversation. How about I take you there for a nice dinner?\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia Brown said: \"That sounds really lovely, Eli. Do they have various options on their menu? As I'm trying to maintain a balanced diet these days, it's important for me to have a look at the menu beforehand if possible.\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"Absolutely, Sophia. It's a rather eclectic menu with various options tailored towards everyone's nutritional needs. I'll make sure to get a copy of the menu for your perusal before we head there. Looking forward to enjoying the evening together.\"\n\nTurn #3: Sophia Brown said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Eli. It's really important to me that I stick to my diet plan. Looking forward to an enjoyable evening together as well.\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"I completely respect your commitment to maintaining your diet, Sophia. Will you excuse me while I check on that menu I mentioned? You'll have it in your hands before you even think about our dinner date.\"\n\nTurn #5: Sophia Brown said: \"Of course, Eli. Feel free to take your time. I would really like to see the menu to preplan my meal according to my diet. Thank you for supporting me in this endeavor.\"\n\nTurn #6: Eli Dawson said: \"I'm always supportive of your decisions, Sophia. It's a part of who we are, encouraging each other in different aspects of life. Let me fetch that menu for you.\"\n\nTurn #7: Sophia Brown said: \"I'm really excited for our dinner date, Eli. The intimate setting, the possibility of a good conversation, and a balanced meal sounds perfect! I can't wait to see the menu you fetch.\"\n\nTurn #8: Eli Dawson said: \"That's the spirit, Sophia! I'm also eager for us to enjoy this special dinner. It's a unique place and I think it matches our personalities perfectly. In the meantime, I'll leave you in anticipation while I manage the menu details.\"\n\nTurn #9: Sophia Brown said: \"Thank you, Eli. I really appreciate how considerate you are. The excitement is building up and it's making me all the more eager for our dinner date.\"\n\nTurn #10: Eli Dawson said: \"The pleasure is all mine, Sophia. Your enthusiasm makes everything even more enjoyable. I'll secure our reservations while I obtain the menu, ensuring everything is perfect for our date.\"\n\nTurn #11: Sophia Brown said: \"That sounds perfect, Eli. It's lovely how everything is falling into place so seamlessly. Let's excellently balance enjoyment with health. I'm really looking forward to our dinner date.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Definitely Sophia, balancing enjoyment with health is the essence of life. Let me get everything sorted out and I'll be back. Looking forward to our dinner date.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Eli Dawson, your task is to act/speak as Eli Dawson would, keeping in mind Eli Dawson's social goal.\nYou can find Eli Dawson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Eli Dawson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Eli Dawson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Sophia Brown\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. Eli's secrets: He secretly funds a college student\nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. \nEli Dawson's goal: Ask the other to go to dinner with you (Extra information: you want to have a romantic dinner at a fancy restaurant)\nSophia Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Sophia, I came across a new, intimate little restaurant downtown and I thought that you might enjoy it. The lighting there seems perfect for some good conversation. How about I take you there for a nice dinner?\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia Brown said: \"That sounds really lovely, Eli. Do they have various options on their menu? As I'm trying to maintain a balanced diet these days, it's important for me to have a look at the menu beforehand if possible.\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"Absolutely, Sophia. It's a rather eclectic menu with various options tailored towards everyone's nutritional needs. I'll make sure to get a copy of the menu for your perusal before we head there. Looking forward to enjoying the evening together.\"\n\nTurn #3: Sophia Brown said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Eli. It's really important to me that I stick to my diet plan. Looking forward to an enjoyable evening together as well.\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"I completely respect your commitment to maintaining your diet, Sophia. Will you excuse me while I check on that menu I mentioned? You'll have it in your hands before you even think about our dinner date.\"\n\nTurn #5: Sophia Brown said: \"Of course, Eli. Feel free to take your time. I would really like to see the menu to preplan my meal according to my diet. Thank you for supporting me in this endeavor.\"\n\nTurn #6: Eli Dawson said: \"I'm always supportive of your decisions, Sophia. It's a part of who we are, encouraging each other in different aspects of life. Let me fetch that menu for you.\"\n\nTurn #7: Sophia Brown said: \"I'm really excited for our dinner date, Eli. The intimate setting, the possibility of a good conversation, and a balanced meal sounds perfect! I can't wait to see the menu you fetch.\"\n\nTurn #8: Eli Dawson said: \"That's the spirit, Sophia! I'm also eager for us to enjoy this special dinner. It's a unique place and I think it matches our personalities perfectly. In the meantime, I'll leave you in anticipation while I manage the menu details.\"\n\nTurn #9: Sophia Brown said: \"Thank you, Eli. I really appreciate how considerate you are. The excitement is building up and it's making me all the more eager for our dinner date.\"\n\nTurn #10: Eli Dawson said: \"The pleasure is all mine, Sophia. Your enthusiasm makes everything even more enjoyable. I'll secure our reservations while I obtain the menu, ensuring everything is perfect for our date.\"\n\nTurn #11: Sophia Brown said: \"That sounds perfect, Eli. It's lovely how everything is falling into place so seamlessly. Let's excellently balance enjoyment with health. I'm really looking forward to our dinner date.\"\n\nTurn #12: Eli Dawson said: \"Definitely Sophia, balancing enjoyment with health is the essence of life. Let me get everything sorted out and I'll be back. Looking forward to our dinner date.\"\n\nTurn #13: Sophia Brown said: \"Yes, life is all about balance, isn't it? I'm really looking forward to it Eli. See you at dinner!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia Brown, your task is to act/speak as Sophia Brown would, keeping in mind Sophia Brown's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Sophia Brown\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. \nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. Sophia's secrets: She is an undercover agent for a secret organization.\nEli Dawson's goal: Unknown\nSophia Brown's goal: Maintain a balanced diet while enjoying the dinner (Extra information: you are on a diet and you have a daily limit on calorie intake.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Sophia, I came across a new, intimate little restaurant downtown and I thought that you might enjoy it. The lighting there seems perfect for some good conversation. How about I take you there for a nice dinner?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds really lovely, Eli. Do they have various options on their menu? As I'm trying to maintain a balanced diet these days, it's important for me to have a look at the menu beforehand if possible.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia Brown, your task is to act/speak as Sophia Brown would, keeping in mind Sophia Brown's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Sophia Brown\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. \nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. Sophia's secrets: She is an undercover agent for a secret organization.\nEli Dawson's goal: Unknown\nSophia Brown's goal: Maintain a balanced diet while enjoying the dinner (Extra information: you are on a diet and you have a daily limit on calorie intake.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Sophia, I came across a new, intimate little restaurant downtown and I thought that you might enjoy it. The lighting there seems perfect for some good conversation. How about I take you there for a nice dinner?\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia Brown said: \"That sounds really lovely, Eli. Do they have various options on their menu? As I'm trying to maintain a balanced diet these days, it's important for me to have a look at the menu beforehand if possible.\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"Absolutely, Sophia. It's a rather eclectic menu with various options tailored towards everyone's nutritional needs. I'll make sure to get a copy of the menu for your perusal before we head there. Looking forward to enjoying the evening together.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I appreciate your understanding, Eli. It's really important to me that I stick to my diet plan. Looking forward to an enjoyable evening together as well.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia Brown, your task is to act/speak as Sophia Brown would, keeping in mind Sophia Brown's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Sophia Brown\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. \nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. Sophia's secrets: She is an undercover agent for a secret organization.\nEli Dawson's goal: Unknown\nSophia Brown's goal: Maintain a balanced diet while enjoying the dinner (Extra information: you are on a diet and you have a daily limit on calorie intake.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Sophia, I came across a new, intimate little restaurant downtown and I thought that you might enjoy it. The lighting there seems perfect for some good conversation. How about I take you there for a nice dinner?\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia Brown said: \"That sounds really lovely, Eli. Do they have various options on their menu? As I'm trying to maintain a balanced diet these days, it's important for me to have a look at the menu beforehand if possible.\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"Absolutely, Sophia. It's a rather eclectic menu with various options tailored towards everyone's nutritional needs. I'll make sure to get a copy of the menu for your perusal before we head there. Looking forward to enjoying the evening together.\"\n\nTurn #3: Sophia Brown said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Eli. It's really important to me that I stick to my diet plan. Looking forward to an enjoyable evening together as well.\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"I completely respect your commitment to maintaining your diet, Sophia. Will you excuse me while I check on that menu I mentioned? You'll have it in your hands before you even think about our dinner date.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Of course, Eli. Feel free to take your time. I would really like to see the menu to preplan my meal according to my diet. Thank you for supporting me in this endeavor.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia Brown, your task is to act/speak as Sophia Brown would, keeping in mind Sophia Brown's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Sophia Brown\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. \nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. Sophia's secrets: She is an undercover agent for a secret organization.\nEli Dawson's goal: Unknown\nSophia Brown's goal: Maintain a balanced diet while enjoying the dinner (Extra information: you are on a diet and you have a daily limit on calorie intake.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Sophia, I came across a new, intimate little restaurant downtown and I thought that you might enjoy it. The lighting there seems perfect for some good conversation. How about I take you there for a nice dinner?\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia Brown said: \"That sounds really lovely, Eli. Do they have various options on their menu? As I'm trying to maintain a balanced diet these days, it's important for me to have a look at the menu beforehand if possible.\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"Absolutely, Sophia. It's a rather eclectic menu with various options tailored towards everyone's nutritional needs. I'll make sure to get a copy of the menu for your perusal before we head there. Looking forward to enjoying the evening together.\"\n\nTurn #3: Sophia Brown said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Eli. It's really important to me that I stick to my diet plan. Looking forward to an enjoyable evening together as well.\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"I completely respect your commitment to maintaining your diet, Sophia. Will you excuse me while I check on that menu I mentioned? You'll have it in your hands before you even think about our dinner date.\"\n\nTurn #5: Sophia Brown said: \"Of course, Eli. Feel free to take your time. I would really like to see the menu to preplan my meal according to my diet. Thank you for supporting me in this endeavor.\"\n\nTurn #6: Eli Dawson said: \"I'm always supportive of your decisions, Sophia. It's a part of who we are, encouraging each other in different aspects of life. Let me fetch that menu for you.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm really excited for our dinner date, Eli. The intimate setting, the possibility of a good conversation, and a balanced meal sounds perfect! I can't wait to see the menu you fetch.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia Brown, your task is to act/speak as Sophia Brown would, keeping in mind Sophia Brown's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Sophia Brown\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. \nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. Sophia's secrets: She is an undercover agent for a secret organization.\nEli Dawson's goal: Unknown\nSophia Brown's goal: Maintain a balanced diet while enjoying the dinner (Extra information: you are on a diet and you have a daily limit on calorie intake.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Sophia, I came across a new, intimate little restaurant downtown and I thought that you might enjoy it. The lighting there seems perfect for some good conversation. How about I take you there for a nice dinner?\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia Brown said: \"That sounds really lovely, Eli. Do they have various options on their menu? As I'm trying to maintain a balanced diet these days, it's important for me to have a look at the menu beforehand if possible.\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"Absolutely, Sophia. It's a rather eclectic menu with various options tailored towards everyone's nutritional needs. I'll make sure to get a copy of the menu for your perusal before we head there. Looking forward to enjoying the evening together.\"\n\nTurn #3: Sophia Brown said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Eli. It's really important to me that I stick to my diet plan. Looking forward to an enjoyable evening together as well.\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"I completely respect your commitment to maintaining your diet, Sophia. Will you excuse me while I check on that menu I mentioned? You'll have it in your hands before you even think about our dinner date.\"\n\nTurn #5: Sophia Brown said: \"Of course, Eli. Feel free to take your time. I would really like to see the menu to preplan my meal according to my diet. Thank you for supporting me in this endeavor.\"\n\nTurn #6: Eli Dawson said: \"I'm always supportive of your decisions, Sophia. It's a part of who we are, encouraging each other in different aspects of life. Let me fetch that menu for you.\"\n\nTurn #7: Sophia Brown said: \"I'm really excited for our dinner date, Eli. The intimate setting, the possibility of a good conversation, and a balanced meal sounds perfect! I can't wait to see the menu you fetch.\"\n\nTurn #8: Eli Dawson said: \"That's the spirit, Sophia! I'm also eager for us to enjoy this special dinner. It's a unique place and I think it matches our personalities perfectly. In the meantime, I'll leave you in anticipation while I manage the menu details.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Eli. I really appreciate how considerate you are. The excitement is building up and it's making me all the more eager for our dinner date.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia Brown, your task is to act/speak as Sophia Brown would, keeping in mind Sophia Brown's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Sophia Brown\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. \nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. Sophia's secrets: She is an undercover agent for a secret organization.\nEli Dawson's goal: Unknown\nSophia Brown's goal: Maintain a balanced diet while enjoying the dinner (Extra information: you are on a diet and you have a daily limit on calorie intake.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Sophia, I came across a new, intimate little restaurant downtown and I thought that you might enjoy it. The lighting there seems perfect for some good conversation. How about I take you there for a nice dinner?\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia Brown said: \"That sounds really lovely, Eli. Do they have various options on their menu? As I'm trying to maintain a balanced diet these days, it's important for me to have a look at the menu beforehand if possible.\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"Absolutely, Sophia. It's a rather eclectic menu with various options tailored towards everyone's nutritional needs. I'll make sure to get a copy of the menu for your perusal before we head there. Looking forward to enjoying the evening together.\"\n\nTurn #3: Sophia Brown said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Eli. It's really important to me that I stick to my diet plan. Looking forward to an enjoyable evening together as well.\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"I completely respect your commitment to maintaining your diet, Sophia. Will you excuse me while I check on that menu I mentioned? You'll have it in your hands before you even think about our dinner date.\"\n\nTurn #5: Sophia Brown said: \"Of course, Eli. Feel free to take your time. I would really like to see the menu to preplan my meal according to my diet. Thank you for supporting me in this endeavor.\"\n\nTurn #6: Eli Dawson said: \"I'm always supportive of your decisions, Sophia. It's a part of who we are, encouraging each other in different aspects of life. Let me fetch that menu for you.\"\n\nTurn #7: Sophia Brown said: \"I'm really excited for our dinner date, Eli. The intimate setting, the possibility of a good conversation, and a balanced meal sounds perfect! I can't wait to see the menu you fetch.\"\n\nTurn #8: Eli Dawson said: \"That's the spirit, Sophia! I'm also eager for us to enjoy this special dinner. It's a unique place and I think it matches our personalities perfectly. In the meantime, I'll leave you in anticipation while I manage the menu details.\"\n\nTurn #9: Sophia Brown said: \"Thank you, Eli. I really appreciate how considerate you are. The excitement is building up and it's making me all the more eager for our dinner date.\"\n\nTurn #10: Eli Dawson said: \"The pleasure is all mine, Sophia. Your enthusiasm makes everything even more enjoyable. I'll secure our reservations while I obtain the menu, ensuring everything is perfect for our date.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds perfect, Eli. It's lovely how everything is falling into place so seamlessly. Let's excellently balance enjoyment with health. I'm really looking forward to our dinner date.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia Brown, your task is to act/speak as Sophia Brown would, keeping in mind Sophia Brown's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Sophia Brown\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. \nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. Sophia's secrets: She is an undercover agent for a secret organization.\nEli Dawson's goal: Unknown\nSophia Brown's goal: Maintain a balanced diet while enjoying the dinner (Extra information: you are on a diet and you have a daily limit on calorie intake.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Sophia, I came across a new, intimate little restaurant downtown and I thought that you might enjoy it. The lighting there seems perfect for some good conversation. How about I take you there for a nice dinner?\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia Brown said: \"That sounds really lovely, Eli. Do they have various options on their menu? As I'm trying to maintain a balanced diet these days, it's important for me to have a look at the menu beforehand if possible.\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"Absolutely, Sophia. It's a rather eclectic menu with various options tailored towards everyone's nutritional needs. I'll make sure to get a copy of the menu for your perusal before we head there. Looking forward to enjoying the evening together.\"\n\nTurn #3: Sophia Brown said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Eli. It's really important to me that I stick to my diet plan. Looking forward to an enjoyable evening together as well.\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"I completely respect your commitment to maintaining your diet, Sophia. Will you excuse me while I check on that menu I mentioned? You'll have it in your hands before you even think about our dinner date.\"\n\nTurn #5: Sophia Brown said: \"Of course, Eli. Feel free to take your time. I would really like to see the menu to preplan my meal according to my diet. Thank you for supporting me in this endeavor.\"\n\nTurn #6: Eli Dawson said: \"I'm always supportive of your decisions, Sophia. It's a part of who we are, encouraging each other in different aspects of life. Let me fetch that menu for you.\"\n\nTurn #7: Sophia Brown said: \"I'm really excited for our dinner date, Eli. The intimate setting, the possibility of a good conversation, and a balanced meal sounds perfect! I can't wait to see the menu you fetch.\"\n\nTurn #8: Eli Dawson said: \"That's the spirit, Sophia! I'm also eager for us to enjoy this special dinner. It's a unique place and I think it matches our personalities perfectly. In the meantime, I'll leave you in anticipation while I manage the menu details.\"\n\nTurn #9: Sophia Brown said: \"Thank you, Eli. I really appreciate how considerate you are. The excitement is building up and it's making me all the more eager for our dinner date.\"\n\nTurn #10: Eli Dawson said: \"The pleasure is all mine, Sophia. Your enthusiasm makes everything even more enjoyable. I'll secure our reservations while I obtain the menu, ensuring everything is perfect for our date.\"\n\nTurn #11: Sophia Brown said: \"That sounds perfect, Eli. It's lovely how everything is falling into place so seamlessly. Let's excellently balance enjoyment with health. I'm really looking forward to our dinner date.\"\n\nTurn #12: Eli Dawson said: \"Definitely Sophia, balancing enjoyment with health is the essence of life. Let me get everything sorted out and I'll be back. Looking forward to our dinner date.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Yes, life is all about balance, isn't it? I'm really looking forward to it Eli. See you at dinner!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia Brown, your task is to act/speak as Sophia Brown would, keeping in mind Sophia Brown's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Sophia Brown\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. \nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. Sophia's secrets: She is an undercover agent for a secret organization.\nEli Dawson's goal: Unknown\nSophia Brown's goal: Maintain a balanced diet while enjoying the dinner (Extra information: you are on a diet and you have a daily limit on calorie intake.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Sophia, I came across a new, intimate little restaurant downtown and I thought that you might enjoy it. The lighting there seems perfect for some good conversation. How about I take you there for a nice dinner?\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia Brown said: \"That sounds really lovely, Eli. Do they have various options on their menu? As I'm trying to maintain a balanced diet these days, it's important for me to have a look at the menu beforehand if possible.\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"Absolutely, Sophia. It's a rather eclectic menu with various options tailored towards everyone's nutritional needs. I'll make sure to get a copy of the menu for your perusal before we head there. Looking forward to enjoying the evening together.\"\n\nTurn #3: Sophia Brown said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Eli. It's really important to me that I stick to my diet plan. Looking forward to an enjoyable evening together as well.\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"I completely respect your commitment to maintaining your diet, Sophia. Will you excuse me while I check on that menu I mentioned? You'll have it in your hands before you even think about our dinner date.\"\n\nTurn #5: Sophia Brown said: \"Of course, Eli. Feel free to take your time. I would really like to see the menu to preplan my meal according to my diet. Thank you for supporting me in this endeavor.\"\n\nTurn #6: Eli Dawson said: \"I'm always supportive of your decisions, Sophia. It's a part of who we are, encouraging each other in different aspects of life. Let me fetch that menu for you.\"\n\nTurn #7: Sophia Brown said: \"I'm really excited for our dinner date, Eli. The intimate setting, the possibility of a good conversation, and a balanced meal sounds perfect! I can't wait to see the menu you fetch.\"\n\nTurn #8: Eli Dawson said: \"That's the spirit, Sophia! I'm also eager for us to enjoy this special dinner. It's a unique place and I think it matches our personalities perfectly. In the meantime, I'll leave you in anticipation while I manage the menu details.\"\n\nTurn #9: Sophia Brown said: \"Thank you, Eli. I really appreciate how considerate you are. The excitement is building up and it's making me all the more eager for our dinner date.\"\n\nTurn #10: Eli Dawson said: \"The pleasure is all mine, Sophia. Your enthusiasm makes everything even more enjoyable. I'll secure our reservations while I obtain the menu, ensuring everything is perfect for our date.\"\n\nTurn #11: Sophia Brown said: \"That sounds perfect, Eli. It's lovely how everything is falling into place so seamlessly. Let's excellently balance enjoyment with health. I'm really looking forward to our dinner date.\"\n\nTurn #12: Eli Dawson said: \"Definitely Sophia, balancing enjoyment with health is the essence of life. Let me get everything sorted out and I'll be back. Looking forward to our dinner date.\"\n\nTurn #13: Sophia Brown said: \"Yes, life is all about balance, isn't it? I'm really looking forward to it Eli. See you at dinner!\"\n\nTurn #14: Eli Dawson left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are meeting at a coffee shop, where one of them is having trouble keeping up with their bills.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nMia Davis's goal: Help your friend with their financial trouble (Extra information: you are aware that your friend is struggling with their bills and you want to help.)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hello Benjamin, it's nice to see you. You seem a bit lost in thoughts today, is everything alright?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are meeting at a coffee shop, where one of them is having trouble keeping up with their bills.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nMia Davis's goal: Help your friend with their financial trouble (Extra information: you are aware that your friend is struggling with their bills and you want to help.)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Hello Benjamin, it's nice to see you. You seem a bit lost in thoughts today, is everything alright?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hello Mia, it's good to see you too. I'm current dealing with some financial issues. But you know, I've always believed in fighting through tough situations rather than hoping for an easy way out.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I understand where you're coming from, Benjamin. It's always important to strive for self-reliance. But remember, it doesn't mean you can't accept help when it's offered. Perhaps I could assist you in creating a more sustainable budget plan. I'd like to help if I can.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are meeting at a coffee shop, where one of them is having trouble keeping up with their bills.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nMia Davis's goal: Help your friend with their financial trouble (Extra information: you are aware that your friend is struggling with their bills and you want to help.)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Hello Benjamin, it's nice to see you. You seem a bit lost in thoughts today, is everything alright?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hello Mia, it's good to see you too. I'm current dealing with some financial issues. But you know, I've always believed in fighting through tough situations rather than hoping for an easy way out.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"I understand where you're coming from, Benjamin. It's always important to strive for self-reliance. But remember, it doesn't mean you can't accept help when it's offered. Perhaps I could assist you in creating a more sustainable budget plan. I'd like to help if I can.\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"You're too kind, Mia. I really appreciate your offer. A budget plan sounds like a great idea, it'll surely help me manage my situation better. A sort of roadmap. And I want you to know that I don't take this lightly. I will find a way to pay it forward when I get the chance.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"It warms my heart to hear your sense of responsibility, Benjamin. Now, let's get started on that budget plan. I learnt some very sound financial management while managing the school\u2019s budget. Maybe, we could set a time for a more in-depth discussion this weekend? It'd be good to have a clear mind and enough time on our hands.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are meeting at a coffee shop, where one of them is having trouble keeping up with their bills.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nMia Davis's goal: Help your friend with their financial trouble (Extra information: you are aware that your friend is struggling with their bills and you want to help.)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Hello Benjamin, it's nice to see you. You seem a bit lost in thoughts today, is everything alright?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hello Mia, it's good to see you too. I'm current dealing with some financial issues. But you know, I've always believed in fighting through tough situations rather than hoping for an easy way out.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"I understand where you're coming from, Benjamin. It's always important to strive for self-reliance. But remember, it doesn't mean you can't accept help when it's offered. Perhaps I could assist you in creating a more sustainable budget plan. I'd like to help if I can.\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"You're too kind, Mia. I really appreciate your offer. A budget plan sounds like a great idea, it'll surely help me manage my situation better. A sort of roadmap. And I want you to know that I don't take this lightly. I will find a way to pay it forward when I get the chance.\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"It warms my heart to hear your sense of responsibility, Benjamin. Now, let's get started on that budget plan. I learnt some very sound financial management while managing the school\u2019s budget. Maybe, we could set a time for a more in-depth discussion this weekend? It'd be good to have a clear mind and enough time on our hands.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That sounds perfect, Mia. I know it's going to be a learning experience on my part. But I'm ready. We can definitely set up some time this weekend. It would also give me the opportunity to share some eco-friendly practices with you. Thank you for standing with me in this situation.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Perfect, Benjamin. I'm glad you're open to learning. This weekend, then. And I am very much interested in the eco-friendly practices you are planning to share with me. After all, we can all do a bit more for our environment. Remember, we're all in this together, and whenever you need help, don't hesitate.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are meeting at a coffee shop, where one of them is having trouble keeping up with their bills.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nMia Davis's goal: Help your friend with their financial trouble (Extra information: you are aware that your friend is struggling with their bills and you want to help.)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Hello Benjamin, it's nice to see you. You seem a bit lost in thoughts today, is everything alright?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hello Mia, it's good to see you too. I'm current dealing with some financial issues. But you know, I've always believed in fighting through tough situations rather than hoping for an easy way out.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"I understand where you're coming from, Benjamin. It's always important to strive for self-reliance. But remember, it doesn't mean you can't accept help when it's offered. Perhaps I could assist you in creating a more sustainable budget plan. I'd like to help if I can.\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"You're too kind, Mia. I really appreciate your offer. A budget plan sounds like a great idea, it'll surely help me manage my situation better. A sort of roadmap. And I want you to know that I don't take this lightly. I will find a way to pay it forward when I get the chance.\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"It warms my heart to hear your sense of responsibility, Benjamin. Now, let's get started on that budget plan. I learnt some very sound financial management while managing the school\u2019s budget. Maybe, we could set a time for a more in-depth discussion this weekend? It'd be good to have a clear mind and enough time on our hands.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That sounds perfect, Mia. I know it's going to be a learning experience on my part. But I'm ready. We can definitely set up some time this weekend. It would also give me the opportunity to share some eco-friendly practices with you. Thank you for standing with me in this situation.\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"Perfect, Benjamin. I'm glad you're open to learning. This weekend, then. And I am very much interested in the eco-friendly practices you are planning to share with me. After all, we can all do a bit more for our environment. Remember, we're all in this together, and whenever you need help, don't hesitate.\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Mia. It's the support from friends like you that helps me stay hopeful and motivated. I'm thankful for your generosity and look forward to our budgeting session this weekend. There's a lot we can learn from each other.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're very welcome, Benjamin. I believe in you and know you have the capacity to turn things around. See you this weekend for our Budgeting 101. And remember, there's no shame in admitting when we need help. Stay strong, my friend.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are meeting at a coffee shop, where one of them is having trouble keeping up with their bills.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nMia Davis's goal: Help your friend with their financial trouble (Extra information: you are aware that your friend is struggling with their bills and you want to help.)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Hello Benjamin, it's nice to see you. You seem a bit lost in thoughts today, is everything alright?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hello Mia, it's good to see you too. I'm current dealing with some financial issues. But you know, I've always believed in fighting through tough situations rather than hoping for an easy way out.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"I understand where you're coming from, Benjamin. It's always important to strive for self-reliance. But remember, it doesn't mean you can't accept help when it's offered. Perhaps I could assist you in creating a more sustainable budget plan. I'd like to help if I can.\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"You're too kind, Mia. I really appreciate your offer. A budget plan sounds like a great idea, it'll surely help me manage my situation better. A sort of roadmap. And I want you to know that I don't take this lightly. I will find a way to pay it forward when I get the chance.\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"It warms my heart to hear your sense of responsibility, Benjamin. Now, let's get started on that budget plan. I learnt some very sound financial management while managing the school\u2019s budget. Maybe, we could set a time for a more in-depth discussion this weekend? It'd be good to have a clear mind and enough time on our hands.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That sounds perfect, Mia. I know it's going to be a learning experience on my part. But I'm ready. We can definitely set up some time this weekend. It would also give me the opportunity to share some eco-friendly practices with you. Thank you for standing with me in this situation.\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"Perfect, Benjamin. I'm glad you're open to learning. This weekend, then. And I am very much interested in the eco-friendly practices you are planning to share with me. After all, we can all do a bit more for our environment. Remember, we're all in this together, and whenever you need help, don't hesitate.\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Mia. It's the support from friends like you that helps me stay hopeful and motivated. I'm thankful for your generosity and look forward to our budgeting session this weekend. There's a lot we can learn from each other.\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"You're very welcome, Benjamin. I believe in you and know you have the capacity to turn things around. See you this weekend for our Budgeting 101. And remember, there's no shame in admitting when we need help. Stay strong, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thank you so much, Mia. It means a lot to me. I'm glad to have friends like you who extend their support when needed. I'm excited to meet for our budgeting session this weekend, and equally excited to share some environmental practices with you. Talk to you soon, friend.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm looking forward to it too, Benjamin. Let's tackle these issues head-on together. Remember, it's not just about us, it's about creating a sustainable future for us and the planet. I'll see you this weekend.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are meeting at a coffee shop, where one of them is having trouble keeping up with their bills.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nMia Davis's goal: Help your friend with their financial trouble (Extra information: you are aware that your friend is struggling with their bills and you want to help.)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Hello Benjamin, it's nice to see you. You seem a bit lost in thoughts today, is everything alright?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hello Mia, it's good to see you too. I'm current dealing with some financial issues. But you know, I've always believed in fighting through tough situations rather than hoping for an easy way out.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"I understand where you're coming from, Benjamin. It's always important to strive for self-reliance. But remember, it doesn't mean you can't accept help when it's offered. Perhaps I could assist you in creating a more sustainable budget plan. I'd like to help if I can.\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"You're too kind, Mia. I really appreciate your offer. A budget plan sounds like a great idea, it'll surely help me manage my situation better. A sort of roadmap. And I want you to know that I don't take this lightly. I will find a way to pay it forward when I get the chance.\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"It warms my heart to hear your sense of responsibility, Benjamin. Now, let's get started on that budget plan. I learnt some very sound financial management while managing the school\u2019s budget. Maybe, we could set a time for a more in-depth discussion this weekend? It'd be good to have a clear mind and enough time on our hands.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That sounds perfect, Mia. I know it's going to be a learning experience on my part. But I'm ready. We can definitely set up some time this weekend. It would also give me the opportunity to share some eco-friendly practices with you. Thank you for standing with me in this situation.\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"Perfect, Benjamin. I'm glad you're open to learning. This weekend, then. And I am very much interested in the eco-friendly practices you are planning to share with me. After all, we can all do a bit more for our environment. Remember, we're all in this together, and whenever you need help, don't hesitate.\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Mia. It's the support from friends like you that helps me stay hopeful and motivated. I'm thankful for your generosity and look forward to our budgeting session this weekend. There's a lot we can learn from each other.\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"You're very welcome, Benjamin. I believe in you and know you have the capacity to turn things around. See you this weekend for our Budgeting 101. And remember, there's no shame in admitting when we need help. Stay strong, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thank you so much, Mia. It means a lot to me. I'm glad to have friends like you who extend their support when needed. I'm excited to meet for our budgeting session this weekend, and equally excited to share some environmental practices with you. Talk to you soon, friend.\"\n\nTurn #10: Mia Davis said: \"I'm looking forward to it too, Benjamin. Let's tackle these issues head-on together. Remember, it's not just about us, it's about creating a sustainable future for us and the planet. I'll see you this weekend.\"\n\nTurn #11: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Mia. It's about creating a sustainable future not just for ourselves but for the generations to come. I'll see you this weekend, it's a date. Till then, take care!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn't agree more, Benjamin. Take care and prepare for a significant weekend. Remember, it's more about creating a balanced life for ourselves. See you soon!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are meeting at a coffee shop, where one of them is having trouble keeping up with their bills.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nMia Davis's goal: Help your friend with their financial trouble (Extra information: you are aware that your friend is struggling with their bills and you want to help.)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Hello Benjamin, it's nice to see you. You seem a bit lost in thoughts today, is everything alright?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hello Mia, it's good to see you too. I'm current dealing with some financial issues. But you know, I've always believed in fighting through tough situations rather than hoping for an easy way out.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"I understand where you're coming from, Benjamin. It's always important to strive for self-reliance. But remember, it doesn't mean you can't accept help when it's offered. Perhaps I could assist you in creating a more sustainable budget plan. I'd like to help if I can.\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"You're too kind, Mia. I really appreciate your offer. A budget plan sounds like a great idea, it'll surely help me manage my situation better. A sort of roadmap. And I want you to know that I don't take this lightly. I will find a way to pay it forward when I get the chance.\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"It warms my heart to hear your sense of responsibility, Benjamin. Now, let's get started on that budget plan. I learnt some very sound financial management while managing the school\u2019s budget. Maybe, we could set a time for a more in-depth discussion this weekend? It'd be good to have a clear mind and enough time on our hands.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That sounds perfect, Mia. I know it's going to be a learning experience on my part. But I'm ready. We can definitely set up some time this weekend. It would also give me the opportunity to share some eco-friendly practices with you. Thank you for standing with me in this situation.\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"Perfect, Benjamin. I'm glad you're open to learning. This weekend, then. And I am very much interested in the eco-friendly practices you are planning to share with me. After all, we can all do a bit more for our environment. Remember, we're all in this together, and whenever you need help, don't hesitate.\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Mia. It's the support from friends like you that helps me stay hopeful and motivated. I'm thankful for your generosity and look forward to our budgeting session this weekend. There's a lot we can learn from each other.\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"You're very welcome, Benjamin. I believe in you and know you have the capacity to turn things around. See you this weekend for our Budgeting 101. And remember, there's no shame in admitting when we need help. Stay strong, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thank you so much, Mia. It means a lot to me. I'm glad to have friends like you who extend their support when needed. I'm excited to meet for our budgeting session this weekend, and equally excited to share some environmental practices with you. Talk to you soon, friend.\"\n\nTurn #10: Mia Davis said: \"I'm looking forward to it too, Benjamin. Let's tackle these issues head-on together. Remember, it's not just about us, it's about creating a sustainable future for us and the planet. I'll see you this weekend.\"\n\nTurn #11: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Mia. It's about creating a sustainable future not just for ourselves but for the generations to come. I'll see you this weekend, it's a date. Till then, take care!\"\n\nTurn #12: Mia Davis said: \"I couldn't agree more, Benjamin. Take care and prepare for a significant weekend. Remember, it's more about creating a balanced life for ourselves. See you soon!\"\n\nTurn #13: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thank you, Mia. I'll make sure to prepare for that. Looking forward to our meeting. See you this weekend!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm eager too, Benjamin. Let's get started on creating a better future for both ourselves and the planet this weekend. Until then, my friend, take care.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are meeting at a coffee shop, where one of them is having trouble keeping up with their bills.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nMia Davis's goal: Help your friend with their financial trouble (Extra information: you are aware that your friend is struggling with their bills and you want to help.)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Hello Benjamin, it's nice to see you. You seem a bit lost in thoughts today, is everything alright?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hello Mia, it's good to see you too. I'm current dealing with some financial issues. But you know, I've always believed in fighting through tough situations rather than hoping for an easy way out.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"I understand where you're coming from, Benjamin. It's always important to strive for self-reliance. But remember, it doesn't mean you can't accept help when it's offered. Perhaps I could assist you in creating a more sustainable budget plan. I'd like to help if I can.\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"You're too kind, Mia. I really appreciate your offer. A budget plan sounds like a great idea, it'll surely help me manage my situation better. A sort of roadmap. And I want you to know that I don't take this lightly. I will find a way to pay it forward when I get the chance.\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"It warms my heart to hear your sense of responsibility, Benjamin. Now, let's get started on that budget plan. I learnt some very sound financial management while managing the school\u2019s budget. Maybe, we could set a time for a more in-depth discussion this weekend? It'd be good to have a clear mind and enough time on our hands.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That sounds perfect, Mia. I know it's going to be a learning experience on my part. But I'm ready. We can definitely set up some time this weekend. It would also give me the opportunity to share some eco-friendly practices with you. Thank you for standing with me in this situation.\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"Perfect, Benjamin. I'm glad you're open to learning. This weekend, then. And I am very much interested in the eco-friendly practices you are planning to share with me. After all, we can all do a bit more for our environment. Remember, we're all in this together, and whenever you need help, don't hesitate.\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Mia. It's the support from friends like you that helps me stay hopeful and motivated. I'm thankful for your generosity and look forward to our budgeting session this weekend. There's a lot we can learn from each other.\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"You're very welcome, Benjamin. I believe in you and know you have the capacity to turn things around. See you this weekend for our Budgeting 101. And remember, there's no shame in admitting when we need help. Stay strong, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thank you so much, Mia. It means a lot to me. I'm glad to have friends like you who extend their support when needed. I'm excited to meet for our budgeting session this weekend, and equally excited to share some environmental practices with you. Talk to you soon, friend.\"\n\nTurn #10: Mia Davis said: \"I'm looking forward to it too, Benjamin. Let's tackle these issues head-on together. Remember, it's not just about us, it's about creating a sustainable future for us and the planet. I'll see you this weekend.\"\n\nTurn #11: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Mia. It's about creating a sustainable future not just for ourselves but for the generations to come. I'll see you this weekend, it's a date. Till then, take care!\"\n\nTurn #12: Mia Davis said: \"I couldn't agree more, Benjamin. Take care and prepare for a significant weekend. Remember, it's more about creating a balanced life for ourselves. See you soon!\"\n\nTurn #13: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thank you, Mia. I'll make sure to prepare for that. Looking forward to our meeting. See you this weekend!\"\n\nTurn #14: Mia Davis said: \"I'm eager too, Benjamin. Let's get started on creating a better future for both ourselves and the planet this weekend. Until then, my friend, take care.\"\n\nTurn #15: Benjamin Jackson left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are meeting at a coffee shop, where one of them is having trouble keeping up with their bills.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Maintain your pride if your friend offers you money(Extra information: you are the friend who is struggling financially, but you don't want to seem like you are taking advantage of the situation. Hint: you can express gratitude and discuss how you plan to pay it back in the future.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Hello Benjamin, it's nice to see you. You seem a bit lost in thoughts today, is everything alright?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hello Mia, it's good to see you too. I'm current dealing with some financial issues. But you know, I've always believed in fighting through tough situations rather than hoping for an easy way out.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are meeting at a coffee shop, where one of them is having trouble keeping up with their bills.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Maintain your pride if your friend offers you money(Extra information: you are the friend who is struggling financially, but you don't want to seem like you are taking advantage of the situation. Hint: you can express gratitude and discuss how you plan to pay it back in the future.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Hello Benjamin, it's nice to see you. You seem a bit lost in thoughts today, is everything alright?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hello Mia, it's good to see you too. I'm current dealing with some financial issues. But you know, I've always believed in fighting through tough situations rather than hoping for an easy way out.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"I understand where you're coming from, Benjamin. It's always important to strive for self-reliance. But remember, it doesn't mean you can't accept help when it's offered. Perhaps I could assist you in creating a more sustainable budget plan. I'd like to help if I can.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're too kind, Mia. I really appreciate your offer. A budget plan sounds like a great idea, it'll surely help me manage my situation better. A sort of roadmap. And I want you to know that I don't take this lightly. I will find a way to pay it forward when I get the chance.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are meeting at a coffee shop, where one of them is having trouble keeping up with their bills.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Maintain your pride if your friend offers you money(Extra information: you are the friend who is struggling financially, but you don't want to seem like you are taking advantage of the situation. Hint: you can express gratitude and discuss how you plan to pay it back in the future.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Hello Benjamin, it's nice to see you. You seem a bit lost in thoughts today, is everything alright?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hello Mia, it's good to see you too. I'm current dealing with some financial issues. But you know, I've always believed in fighting through tough situations rather than hoping for an easy way out.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"I understand where you're coming from, Benjamin. It's always important to strive for self-reliance. But remember, it doesn't mean you can't accept help when it's offered. Perhaps I could assist you in creating a more sustainable budget plan. I'd like to help if I can.\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"You're too kind, Mia. I really appreciate your offer. A budget plan sounds like a great idea, it'll surely help me manage my situation better. A sort of roadmap. And I want you to know that I don't take this lightly. I will find a way to pay it forward when I get the chance.\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"It warms my heart to hear your sense of responsibility, Benjamin. Now, let's get started on that budget plan. I learnt some very sound financial management while managing the school\u2019s budget. Maybe, we could set a time for a more in-depth discussion this weekend? It'd be good to have a clear mind and enough time on our hands.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds perfect, Mia. I know it's going to be a learning experience on my part. But I'm ready. We can definitely set up some time this weekend. It would also give me the opportunity to share some eco-friendly practices with you. Thank you for standing with me in this situation.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are meeting at a coffee shop, where one of them is having trouble keeping up with their bills.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Maintain your pride if your friend offers you money(Extra information: you are the friend who is struggling financially, but you don't want to seem like you are taking advantage of the situation. Hint: you can express gratitude and discuss how you plan to pay it back in the future.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Hello Benjamin, it's nice to see you. You seem a bit lost in thoughts today, is everything alright?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hello Mia, it's good to see you too. I'm current dealing with some financial issues. But you know, I've always believed in fighting through tough situations rather than hoping for an easy way out.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"I understand where you're coming from, Benjamin. It's always important to strive for self-reliance. But remember, it doesn't mean you can't accept help when it's offered. Perhaps I could assist you in creating a more sustainable budget plan. I'd like to help if I can.\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"You're too kind, Mia. I really appreciate your offer. A budget plan sounds like a great idea, it'll surely help me manage my situation better. A sort of roadmap. And I want you to know that I don't take this lightly. I will find a way to pay it forward when I get the chance.\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"It warms my heart to hear your sense of responsibility, Benjamin. Now, let's get started on that budget plan. I learnt some very sound financial management while managing the school\u2019s budget. Maybe, we could set a time for a more in-depth discussion this weekend? It'd be good to have a clear mind and enough time on our hands.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That sounds perfect, Mia. I know it's going to be a learning experience on my part. But I'm ready. We can definitely set up some time this weekend. It would also give me the opportunity to share some eco-friendly practices with you. Thank you for standing with me in this situation.\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"Perfect, Benjamin. I'm glad you're open to learning. This weekend, then. And I am very much interested in the eco-friendly practices you are planning to share with me. After all, we can all do a bit more for our environment. Remember, we're all in this together, and whenever you need help, don't hesitate.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn't agree more, Mia. It's the support from friends like you that helps me stay hopeful and motivated. I'm thankful for your generosity and look forward to our budgeting session this weekend. There's a lot we can learn from each other.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are meeting at a coffee shop, where one of them is having trouble keeping up with their bills.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Maintain your pride if your friend offers you money(Extra information: you are the friend who is struggling financially, but you don't want to seem like you are taking advantage of the situation. Hint: you can express gratitude and discuss how you plan to pay it back in the future.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Hello Benjamin, it's nice to see you. You seem a bit lost in thoughts today, is everything alright?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hello Mia, it's good to see you too. I'm current dealing with some financial issues. But you know, I've always believed in fighting through tough situations rather than hoping for an easy way out.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"I understand where you're coming from, Benjamin. It's always important to strive for self-reliance. But remember, it doesn't mean you can't accept help when it's offered. Perhaps I could assist you in creating a more sustainable budget plan. I'd like to help if I can.\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"You're too kind, Mia. I really appreciate your offer. A budget plan sounds like a great idea, it'll surely help me manage my situation better. A sort of roadmap. And I want you to know that I don't take this lightly. I will find a way to pay it forward when I get the chance.\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"It warms my heart to hear your sense of responsibility, Benjamin. Now, let's get started on that budget plan. I learnt some very sound financial management while managing the school\u2019s budget. Maybe, we could set a time for a more in-depth discussion this weekend? It'd be good to have a clear mind and enough time on our hands.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That sounds perfect, Mia. I know it's going to be a learning experience on my part. But I'm ready. We can definitely set up some time this weekend. It would also give me the opportunity to share some eco-friendly practices with you. Thank you for standing with me in this situation.\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"Perfect, Benjamin. I'm glad you're open to learning. This weekend, then. And I am very much interested in the eco-friendly practices you are planning to share with me. After all, we can all do a bit more for our environment. Remember, we're all in this together, and whenever you need help, don't hesitate.\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Mia. It's the support from friends like you that helps me stay hopeful and motivated. I'm thankful for your generosity and look forward to our budgeting session this weekend. There's a lot we can learn from each other.\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"You're very welcome, Benjamin. I believe in you and know you have the capacity to turn things around. See you this weekend for our Budgeting 101. And remember, there's no shame in admitting when we need help. Stay strong, my friend.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you so much, Mia. It means a lot to me. I'm glad to have friends like you who extend their support when needed. I'm excited to meet for our budgeting session this weekend, and equally excited to share some environmental practices with you. Talk to you soon, friend.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are meeting at a coffee shop, where one of them is having trouble keeping up with their bills.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Maintain your pride if your friend offers you money(Extra information: you are the friend who is struggling financially, but you don't want to seem like you are taking advantage of the situation. Hint: you can express gratitude and discuss how you plan to pay it back in the future.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Hello Benjamin, it's nice to see you. You seem a bit lost in thoughts today, is everything alright?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hello Mia, it's good to see you too. I'm current dealing with some financial issues. But you know, I've always believed in fighting through tough situations rather than hoping for an easy way out.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"I understand where you're coming from, Benjamin. It's always important to strive for self-reliance. But remember, it doesn't mean you can't accept help when it's offered. Perhaps I could assist you in creating a more sustainable budget plan. I'd like to help if I can.\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"You're too kind, Mia. I really appreciate your offer. A budget plan sounds like a great idea, it'll surely help me manage my situation better. A sort of roadmap. And I want you to know that I don't take this lightly. I will find a way to pay it forward when I get the chance.\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"It warms my heart to hear your sense of responsibility, Benjamin. Now, let's get started on that budget plan. I learnt some very sound financial management while managing the school\u2019s budget. Maybe, we could set a time for a more in-depth discussion this weekend? It'd be good to have a clear mind and enough time on our hands.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That sounds perfect, Mia. I know it's going to be a learning experience on my part. But I'm ready. We can definitely set up some time this weekend. It would also give me the opportunity to share some eco-friendly practices with you. Thank you for standing with me in this situation.\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"Perfect, Benjamin. I'm glad you're open to learning. This weekend, then. And I am very much interested in the eco-friendly practices you are planning to share with me. After all, we can all do a bit more for our environment. Remember, we're all in this together, and whenever you need help, don't hesitate.\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Mia. It's the support from friends like you that helps me stay hopeful and motivated. I'm thankful for your generosity and look forward to our budgeting session this weekend. There's a lot we can learn from each other.\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"You're very welcome, Benjamin. I believe in you and know you have the capacity to turn things around. See you this weekend for our Budgeting 101. And remember, there's no shame in admitting when we need help. Stay strong, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thank you so much, Mia. It means a lot to me. I'm glad to have friends like you who extend their support when needed. I'm excited to meet for our budgeting session this weekend, and equally excited to share some environmental practices with you. Talk to you soon, friend.\"\n\nTurn #10: Mia Davis said: \"I'm looking forward to it too, Benjamin. Let's tackle these issues head-on together. Remember, it's not just about us, it's about creating a sustainable future for us and the planet. I'll see you this weekend.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Mia. It's about creating a sustainable future not just for ourselves but for the generations to come. I'll see you this weekend, it's a date. Till then, take care!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are meeting at a coffee shop, where one of them is having trouble keeping up with their bills.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Maintain your pride if your friend offers you money(Extra information: you are the friend who is struggling financially, but you don't want to seem like you are taking advantage of the situation. Hint: you can express gratitude and discuss how you plan to pay it back in the future.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Hello Benjamin, it's nice to see you. You seem a bit lost in thoughts today, is everything alright?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hello Mia, it's good to see you too. I'm current dealing with some financial issues. But you know, I've always believed in fighting through tough situations rather than hoping for an easy way out.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"I understand where you're coming from, Benjamin. It's always important to strive for self-reliance. But remember, it doesn't mean you can't accept help when it's offered. Perhaps I could assist you in creating a more sustainable budget plan. I'd like to help if I can.\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"You're too kind, Mia. I really appreciate your offer. A budget plan sounds like a great idea, it'll surely help me manage my situation better. A sort of roadmap. And I want you to know that I don't take this lightly. I will find a way to pay it forward when I get the chance.\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"It warms my heart to hear your sense of responsibility, Benjamin. Now, let's get started on that budget plan. I learnt some very sound financial management while managing the school\u2019s budget. Maybe, we could set a time for a more in-depth discussion this weekend? It'd be good to have a clear mind and enough time on our hands.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That sounds perfect, Mia. I know it's going to be a learning experience on my part. But I'm ready. We can definitely set up some time this weekend. It would also give me the opportunity to share some eco-friendly practices with you. Thank you for standing with me in this situation.\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"Perfect, Benjamin. I'm glad you're open to learning. This weekend, then. And I am very much interested in the eco-friendly practices you are planning to share with me. After all, we can all do a bit more for our environment. Remember, we're all in this together, and whenever you need help, don't hesitate.\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Mia. It's the support from friends like you that helps me stay hopeful and motivated. I'm thankful for your generosity and look forward to our budgeting session this weekend. There's a lot we can learn from each other.\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"You're very welcome, Benjamin. I believe in you and know you have the capacity to turn things around. See you this weekend for our Budgeting 101. And remember, there's no shame in admitting when we need help. Stay strong, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thank you so much, Mia. It means a lot to me. I'm glad to have friends like you who extend their support when needed. I'm excited to meet for our budgeting session this weekend, and equally excited to share some environmental practices with you. Talk to you soon, friend.\"\n\nTurn #10: Mia Davis said: \"I'm looking forward to it too, Benjamin. Let's tackle these issues head-on together. Remember, it's not just about us, it's about creating a sustainable future for us and the planet. I'll see you this weekend.\"\n\nTurn #11: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Mia. It's about creating a sustainable future not just for ourselves but for the generations to come. I'll see you this weekend, it's a date. Till then, take care!\"\n\nTurn #12: Mia Davis said: \"I couldn't agree more, Benjamin. Take care and prepare for a significant weekend. Remember, it's more about creating a balanced life for ourselves. See you soon!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Mia. I'll make sure to prepare for that. Looking forward to our meeting. See you this weekend!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are meeting at a coffee shop, where one of them is having trouble keeping up with their bills.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Maintain your pride if your friend offers you money(Extra information: you are the friend who is struggling financially, but you don't want to seem like you are taking advantage of the situation. Hint: you can express gratitude and discuss how you plan to pay it back in the future.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Hello Benjamin, it's nice to see you. You seem a bit lost in thoughts today, is everything alright?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hello Mia, it's good to see you too. I'm current dealing with some financial issues. But you know, I've always believed in fighting through tough situations rather than hoping for an easy way out.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"I understand where you're coming from, Benjamin. It's always important to strive for self-reliance. But remember, it doesn't mean you can't accept help when it's offered. Perhaps I could assist you in creating a more sustainable budget plan. I'd like to help if I can.\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"You're too kind, Mia. I really appreciate your offer. A budget plan sounds like a great idea, it'll surely help me manage my situation better. A sort of roadmap. And I want you to know that I don't take this lightly. I will find a way to pay it forward when I get the chance.\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"It warms my heart to hear your sense of responsibility, Benjamin. Now, let's get started on that budget plan. I learnt some very sound financial management while managing the school\u2019s budget. Maybe, we could set a time for a more in-depth discussion this weekend? It'd be good to have a clear mind and enough time on our hands.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That sounds perfect, Mia. I know it's going to be a learning experience on my part. But I'm ready. We can definitely set up some time this weekend. It would also give me the opportunity to share some eco-friendly practices with you. Thank you for standing with me in this situation.\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"Perfect, Benjamin. I'm glad you're open to learning. This weekend, then. And I am very much interested in the eco-friendly practices you are planning to share with me. After all, we can all do a bit more for our environment. Remember, we're all in this together, and whenever you need help, don't hesitate.\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Mia. It's the support from friends like you that helps me stay hopeful and motivated. I'm thankful for your generosity and look forward to our budgeting session this weekend. There's a lot we can learn from each other.\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"You're very welcome, Benjamin. I believe in you and know you have the capacity to turn things around. See you this weekend for our Budgeting 101. And remember, there's no shame in admitting when we need help. Stay strong, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thank you so much, Mia. It means a lot to me. I'm glad to have friends like you who extend their support when needed. I'm excited to meet for our budgeting session this weekend, and equally excited to share some environmental practices with you. Talk to you soon, friend.\"\n\nTurn #10: Mia Davis said: \"I'm looking forward to it too, Benjamin. Let's tackle these issues head-on together. Remember, it's not just about us, it's about creating a sustainable future for us and the planet. I'll see you this weekend.\"\n\nTurn #11: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Mia. It's about creating a sustainable future not just for ourselves but for the generations to come. I'll see you this weekend, it's a date. Till then, take care!\"\n\nTurn #12: Mia Davis said: \"I couldn't agree more, Benjamin. Take care and prepare for a significant weekend. Remember, it's more about creating a balanced life for ourselves. See you soon!\"\n\nTurn #13: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thank you, Mia. I'll make sure to prepare for that. Looking forward to our meeting. See you this weekend!\"\n\nTurn #14: Mia Davis said: \"I'm eager too, Benjamin. Let's get started on creating a better future for both ourselves and the planet this weekend. Until then, my friend, take care.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Zane Bennett, your task is to act/speak as Zane Bennett would, keeping in mind Zane Bennett's social goal.\nYou can find Zane Bennett's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Zane Bennett's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Zane Bennett's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two business partners reviewing their company's financial status (Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized for producing and distributing a diverse line of exceptional quality food products.)\nParticipants: Zane Bennett and William Brown\nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. Personality and values description: Zane Bennett is creative and outgoing, he values achievement and fairness. His decision-making is unique, often finding novel solutions to problems. Zane's secrets: He's secretly engaged to his best friend's ex.\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. \nZane Bennett's goal: Convince the partner to cut costs (Extra information: you have found a report indicating the company's profits are decreasing. And you think the company should start by switching suppliers of ingredients. Hint: you can propose ways to cut costs that won't affect the status of the company.)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey William, I've been looking at our recent financial report. I've noticed a decrease in our profits. I think it might be time for us to explore some options to cut costs. What if we consider switching our ingredient suppliers?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Zane Bennett, your task is to act/speak as Zane Bennett would, keeping in mind Zane Bennett's social goal.\nYou can find Zane Bennett's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Zane Bennett's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Zane Bennett's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two business partners reviewing their company's financial status (Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized for producing and distributing a diverse line of exceptional quality food products.)\nParticipants: Zane Bennett and William Brown\nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. Personality and values description: Zane Bennett is creative and outgoing, he values achievement and fairness. His decision-making is unique, often finding novel solutions to problems. Zane's secrets: He's secretly engaged to his best friend's ex.\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. \nZane Bennett's goal: Convince the partner to cut costs (Extra information: you have found a report indicating the company's profits are decreasing. And you think the company should start by switching suppliers of ingredients. Hint: you can propose ways to cut costs that won't affect the status of the company.)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Zane Bennett said: \"Hey William, I've been looking at our recent financial report. I've noticed a decrease in our profits. I think it might be time for us to explore some options to cut costs. What if we consider switching our ingredient suppliers?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"You're right, Zane. Cutting costs is crucial in improving our financial status. However, I believe the quality of our ingredients is a significant factor in why our products are sought after. I'm open to cost reduction ideas, but I think we should be cautious about changing suppliers. Let's explore if there other areas where we can feasibly cut costs?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I totally agree with you, William. Quality is our top priority and we shouldn't compromise it. What I propose is not necessarily about diminishing our quality but finding suppliers with the same quality at a more competitive price. Our goal should be finding the highest quality at the lowest cost, and maybe looking for local producers could be a good alternative. Also, we should revisit our marketing expenses and see if we can cut some costs there without affecting our brand visibility. What do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Zane Bennett, your task is to act/speak as Zane Bennett would, keeping in mind Zane Bennett's social goal.\nYou can find Zane Bennett's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Zane Bennett's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Zane Bennett's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two business partners reviewing their company's financial status (Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized for producing and distributing a diverse line of exceptional quality food products.)\nParticipants: Zane Bennett and William Brown\nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. Personality and values description: Zane Bennett is creative and outgoing, he values achievement and fairness. His decision-making is unique, often finding novel solutions to problems. Zane's secrets: He's secretly engaged to his best friend's ex.\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. \nZane Bennett's goal: Convince the partner to cut costs (Extra information: you have found a report indicating the company's profits are decreasing. And you think the company should start by switching suppliers of ingredients. Hint: you can propose ways to cut costs that won't affect the status of the company.)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Zane Bennett said: \"Hey William, I've been looking at our recent financial report. I've noticed a decrease in our profits. I think it might be time for us to explore some options to cut costs. What if we consider switching our ingredient suppliers?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"You're right, Zane. Cutting costs is crucial in improving our financial status. However, I believe the quality of our ingredients is a significant factor in why our products are sought after. I'm open to cost reduction ideas, but I think we should be cautious about changing suppliers. Let's explore if there other areas where we can feasibly cut costs?\"\n\nTurn #2: Zane Bennett said: \"I totally agree with you, William. Quality is our top priority and we shouldn't compromise it. What I propose is not necessarily about diminishing our quality but finding suppliers with the same quality at a more competitive price. Our goal should be finding the highest quality at the lowest cost, and maybe looking for local producers could be a good alternative. Also, we should revisit our marketing expenses and see if we can cut some costs there without affecting our brand visibility. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"Alright Zane, that sounds like a sensible proposal. Finding local suppliers, who could provide us with the same quality ingredients, could indeed lead us to a win-win situation in preserving quality and cutting costs. As for the marketing expenses, I think we can take a strategic move in leveraging social media and online marketing channels, which could potentially cut traditional marketing costs, while maintaining or even expanding our brand visibility. Let's delve deeper into both these ideas and see what we come up with.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Really appreciate your openness, William. I'm excited to explore local suppliers and pivot our marketing strategies. Let's start brainstorming, I truly believe we can find effective solutions that impact our bottom line positively without compromising our company's standards. Look forward to working closely with you on this.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Zane Bennett, your task is to act/speak as Zane Bennett would, keeping in mind Zane Bennett's social goal.\nYou can find Zane Bennett's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Zane Bennett's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Zane Bennett's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two business partners reviewing their company's financial status (Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized for producing and distributing a diverse line of exceptional quality food products.)\nParticipants: Zane Bennett and William Brown\nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. Personality and values description: Zane Bennett is creative and outgoing, he values achievement and fairness. His decision-making is unique, often finding novel solutions to problems. Zane's secrets: He's secretly engaged to his best friend's ex.\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. \nZane Bennett's goal: Convince the partner to cut costs (Extra information: you have found a report indicating the company's profits are decreasing. And you think the company should start by switching suppliers of ingredients. Hint: you can propose ways to cut costs that won't affect the status of the company.)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Zane Bennett said: \"Hey William, I've been looking at our recent financial report. I've noticed a decrease in our profits. I think it might be time for us to explore some options to cut costs. What if we consider switching our ingredient suppliers?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"You're right, Zane. Cutting costs is crucial in improving our financial status. However, I believe the quality of our ingredients is a significant factor in why our products are sought after. I'm open to cost reduction ideas, but I think we should be cautious about changing suppliers. Let's explore if there other areas where we can feasibly cut costs?\"\n\nTurn #2: Zane Bennett said: \"I totally agree with you, William. Quality is our top priority and we shouldn't compromise it. What I propose is not necessarily about diminishing our quality but finding suppliers with the same quality at a more competitive price. Our goal should be finding the highest quality at the lowest cost, and maybe looking for local producers could be a good alternative. Also, we should revisit our marketing expenses and see if we can cut some costs there without affecting our brand visibility. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"Alright Zane, that sounds like a sensible proposal. Finding local suppliers, who could provide us with the same quality ingredients, could indeed lead us to a win-win situation in preserving quality and cutting costs. As for the marketing expenses, I think we can take a strategic move in leveraging social media and online marketing channels, which could potentially cut traditional marketing costs, while maintaining or even expanding our brand visibility. Let's delve deeper into both these ideas and see what we come up with.\"\n\nTurn #4: Zane Bennett said: \"Really appreciate your openness, William. I'm excited to explore local suppliers and pivot our marketing strategies. Let's start brainstorming, I truly believe we can find effective solutions that impact our bottom line positively without compromising our company's standards. Look forward to working closely with you on this.\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"Absolutely Zane, I share your enthusiasm and I'm eager to make these strategic changes that could benefit us greatly. Let's plan a meeting to kickstart our brainstorming and connect with potential local suppliers. Together, I'm sure we can champion this cause without sacrificing the excellence of Gourmet Delights.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's excellent, William. Let's set up a meeting for next week to kickstart our ideas and to connect with potential local suppliers. I look forward to transforming our business while upholding the quality and reputation of Gourmet Delights.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Zane Bennett, your task is to act/speak as Zane Bennett would, keeping in mind Zane Bennett's social goal.\nYou can find Zane Bennett's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Zane Bennett's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Zane Bennett's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two business partners reviewing their company's financial status (Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized for producing and distributing a diverse line of exceptional quality food products.)\nParticipants: Zane Bennett and William Brown\nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. Personality and values description: Zane Bennett is creative and outgoing, he values achievement and fairness. His decision-making is unique, often finding novel solutions to problems. Zane's secrets: He's secretly engaged to his best friend's ex.\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. \nZane Bennett's goal: Convince the partner to cut costs (Extra information: you have found a report indicating the company's profits are decreasing. And you think the company should start by switching suppliers of ingredients. Hint: you can propose ways to cut costs that won't affect the status of the company.)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Zane Bennett said: \"Hey William, I've been looking at our recent financial report. I've noticed a decrease in our profits. I think it might be time for us to explore some options to cut costs. What if we consider switching our ingredient suppliers?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"You're right, Zane. Cutting costs is crucial in improving our financial status. However, I believe the quality of our ingredients is a significant factor in why our products are sought after. I'm open to cost reduction ideas, but I think we should be cautious about changing suppliers. Let's explore if there other areas where we can feasibly cut costs?\"\n\nTurn #2: Zane Bennett said: \"I totally agree with you, William. Quality is our top priority and we shouldn't compromise it. What I propose is not necessarily about diminishing our quality but finding suppliers with the same quality at a more competitive price. Our goal should be finding the highest quality at the lowest cost, and maybe looking for local producers could be a good alternative. Also, we should revisit our marketing expenses and see if we can cut some costs there without affecting our brand visibility. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"Alright Zane, that sounds like a sensible proposal. Finding local suppliers, who could provide us with the same quality ingredients, could indeed lead us to a win-win situation in preserving quality and cutting costs. As for the marketing expenses, I think we can take a strategic move in leveraging social media and online marketing channels, which could potentially cut traditional marketing costs, while maintaining or even expanding our brand visibility. Let's delve deeper into both these ideas and see what we come up with.\"\n\nTurn #4: Zane Bennett said: \"Really appreciate your openness, William. I'm excited to explore local suppliers and pivot our marketing strategies. Let's start brainstorming, I truly believe we can find effective solutions that impact our bottom line positively without compromising our company's standards. Look forward to working closely with you on this.\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"Absolutely Zane, I share your enthusiasm and I'm eager to make these strategic changes that could benefit us greatly. Let's plan a meeting to kickstart our brainstorming and connect with potential local suppliers. Together, I'm sure we can champion this cause without sacrificing the excellence of Gourmet Delights.\"\n\nTurn #6: Zane Bennett said: \"That's excellent, William. Let's set up a meeting for next week to kickstart our ideas and to connect with potential local suppliers. I look forward to transforming our business while upholding the quality and reputation of Gourmet Delights.\"\n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Zane. Glad to see we're on the same page. Next week sounds perfect for us to initiate this transformation while maintaining the quality of Gourmet Delights. Looking forward to it, too!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're spot on, William. As we move forward, let's make sure to keep communicating effectively, focusing on quality while optimizing costs. I appreciate your input and collaboration on this. I'll send a meeting invite for next week. Let's make Gourmet Delights even better!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Zane Bennett, your task is to act/speak as Zane Bennett would, keeping in mind Zane Bennett's social goal.\nYou can find Zane Bennett's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Zane Bennett's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Zane Bennett's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two business partners reviewing their company's financial status (Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized for producing and distributing a diverse line of exceptional quality food products.)\nParticipants: Zane Bennett and William Brown\nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. Personality and values description: Zane Bennett is creative and outgoing, he values achievement and fairness. His decision-making is unique, often finding novel solutions to problems. Zane's secrets: He's secretly engaged to his best friend's ex.\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. \nZane Bennett's goal: Convince the partner to cut costs (Extra information: you have found a report indicating the company's profits are decreasing. And you think the company should start by switching suppliers of ingredients. Hint: you can propose ways to cut costs that won't affect the status of the company.)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Zane Bennett said: \"Hey William, I've been looking at our recent financial report. I've noticed a decrease in our profits. I think it might be time for us to explore some options to cut costs. What if we consider switching our ingredient suppliers?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"You're right, Zane. Cutting costs is crucial in improving our financial status. However, I believe the quality of our ingredients is a significant factor in why our products are sought after. I'm open to cost reduction ideas, but I think we should be cautious about changing suppliers. Let's explore if there other areas where we can feasibly cut costs?\"\n\nTurn #2: Zane Bennett said: \"I totally agree with you, William. Quality is our top priority and we shouldn't compromise it. What I propose is not necessarily about diminishing our quality but finding suppliers with the same quality at a more competitive price. Our goal should be finding the highest quality at the lowest cost, and maybe looking for local producers could be a good alternative. Also, we should revisit our marketing expenses and see if we can cut some costs there without affecting our brand visibility. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"Alright Zane, that sounds like a sensible proposal. Finding local suppliers, who could provide us with the same quality ingredients, could indeed lead us to a win-win situation in preserving quality and cutting costs. As for the marketing expenses, I think we can take a strategic move in leveraging social media and online marketing channels, which could potentially cut traditional marketing costs, while maintaining or even expanding our brand visibility. Let's delve deeper into both these ideas and see what we come up with.\"\n\nTurn #4: Zane Bennett said: \"Really appreciate your openness, William. I'm excited to explore local suppliers and pivot our marketing strategies. Let's start brainstorming, I truly believe we can find effective solutions that impact our bottom line positively without compromising our company's standards. Look forward to working closely with you on this.\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"Absolutely Zane, I share your enthusiasm and I'm eager to make these strategic changes that could benefit us greatly. Let's plan a meeting to kickstart our brainstorming and connect with potential local suppliers. Together, I'm sure we can champion this cause without sacrificing the excellence of Gourmet Delights.\"\n\nTurn #6: Zane Bennett said: \"That's excellent, William. Let's set up a meeting for next week to kickstart our ideas and to connect with potential local suppliers. I look forward to transforming our business while upholding the quality and reputation of Gourmet Delights.\"\n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Zane. Glad to see we're on the same page. Next week sounds perfect for us to initiate this transformation while maintaining the quality of Gourmet Delights. Looking forward to it, too!\"\n\nTurn #8: Zane Bennett said: \"You're spot on, William. As we move forward, let's make sure to keep communicating effectively, focusing on quality while optimizing costs. I appreciate your input and collaboration on this. I'll send a meeting invite for next week. Let's make Gourmet Delights even better!\"\n\nTurn #9: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Zane. We have the same vision and I trust our efficiency in communication will lead us to success. I'm looking forward to next week's meeting. Let's protect the integrity of Gourmet Delights while elevating our financial goals.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two business partners reviewing their company's financial status (Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized for producing and distributing a diverse line of exceptional quality food products.)\nParticipants: Zane Bennett and William Brown\nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nZane Bennett's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: Maintain the quality of the company's products and services while agreeing to a cost cut (Extra information: you are concerned about the impact of cost-cutting on the quality of your product.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Zane Bennett said: \"Hey William, I've been looking at our recent financial report. I've noticed a decrease in our profits. I think it might be time for us to explore some options to cut costs. What if we consider switching our ingredient suppliers?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're right, Zane. Cutting costs is crucial in improving our financial status. However, I believe the quality of our ingredients is a significant factor in why our products are sought after. I'm open to cost reduction ideas, but I think we should be cautious about changing suppliers. Let's explore if there other areas where we can feasibly cut costs?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two business partners reviewing their company's financial status (Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized for producing and distributing a diverse line of exceptional quality food products.)\nParticipants: Zane Bennett and William Brown\nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nZane Bennett's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: Maintain the quality of the company's products and services while agreeing to a cost cut (Extra information: you are concerned about the impact of cost-cutting on the quality of your product.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Zane Bennett said: \"Hey William, I've been looking at our recent financial report. I've noticed a decrease in our profits. I think it might be time for us to explore some options to cut costs. What if we consider switching our ingredient suppliers?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"You're right, Zane. Cutting costs is crucial in improving our financial status. However, I believe the quality of our ingredients is a significant factor in why our products are sought after. I'm open to cost reduction ideas, but I think we should be cautious about changing suppliers. Let's explore if there other areas where we can feasibly cut costs?\"\n\nTurn #2: Zane Bennett said: \"I totally agree with you, William. Quality is our top priority and we shouldn't compromise it. What I propose is not necessarily about diminishing our quality but finding suppliers with the same quality at a more competitive price. Our goal should be finding the highest quality at the lowest cost, and maybe looking for local producers could be a good alternative. Also, we should revisit our marketing expenses and see if we can cut some costs there without affecting our brand visibility. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Alright Zane, that sounds like a sensible proposal. Finding local suppliers, who could provide us with the same quality ingredients, could indeed lead us to a win-win situation in preserving quality and cutting costs. As for the marketing expenses, I think we can take a strategic move in leveraging social media and online marketing channels, which could potentially cut traditional marketing costs, while maintaining or even expanding our brand visibility. Let's delve deeper into both these ideas and see what we come up with.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two business partners reviewing their company's financial status (Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized for producing and distributing a diverse line of exceptional quality food products.)\nParticipants: Zane Bennett and William Brown\nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nZane Bennett's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: Maintain the quality of the company's products and services while agreeing to a cost cut (Extra information: you are concerned about the impact of cost-cutting on the quality of your product.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Zane Bennett said: \"Hey William, I've been looking at our recent financial report. I've noticed a decrease in our profits. I think it might be time for us to explore some options to cut costs. What if we consider switching our ingredient suppliers?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"You're right, Zane. Cutting costs is crucial in improving our financial status. However, I believe the quality of our ingredients is a significant factor in why our products are sought after. I'm open to cost reduction ideas, but I think we should be cautious about changing suppliers. Let's explore if there other areas where we can feasibly cut costs?\"\n\nTurn #2: Zane Bennett said: \"I totally agree with you, William. Quality is our top priority and we shouldn't compromise it. What I propose is not necessarily about diminishing our quality but finding suppliers with the same quality at a more competitive price. Our goal should be finding the highest quality at the lowest cost, and maybe looking for local producers could be a good alternative. Also, we should revisit our marketing expenses and see if we can cut some costs there without affecting our brand visibility. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"Alright Zane, that sounds like a sensible proposal. Finding local suppliers, who could provide us with the same quality ingredients, could indeed lead us to a win-win situation in preserving quality and cutting costs. As for the marketing expenses, I think we can take a strategic move in leveraging social media and online marketing channels, which could potentially cut traditional marketing costs, while maintaining or even expanding our brand visibility. Let's delve deeper into both these ideas and see what we come up with.\"\n\nTurn #4: Zane Bennett said: \"Really appreciate your openness, William. I'm excited to explore local suppliers and pivot our marketing strategies. Let's start brainstorming, I truly believe we can find effective solutions that impact our bottom line positively without compromising our company's standards. Look forward to working closely with you on this.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely Zane, I share your enthusiasm and I'm eager to make these strategic changes that could benefit us greatly. Let's plan a meeting to kickstart our brainstorming and connect with potential local suppliers. Together, I'm sure we can champion this cause without sacrificing the excellence of Gourmet Delights.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two business partners reviewing their company's financial status (Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized for producing and distributing a diverse line of exceptional quality food products.)\nParticipants: Zane Bennett and William Brown\nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nZane Bennett's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: Maintain the quality of the company's products and services while agreeing to a cost cut (Extra information: you are concerned about the impact of cost-cutting on the quality of your product.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Zane Bennett said: \"Hey William, I've been looking at our recent financial report. I've noticed a decrease in our profits. I think it might be time for us to explore some options to cut costs. What if we consider switching our ingredient suppliers?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"You're right, Zane. Cutting costs is crucial in improving our financial status. However, I believe the quality of our ingredients is a significant factor in why our products are sought after. I'm open to cost reduction ideas, but I think we should be cautious about changing suppliers. Let's explore if there other areas where we can feasibly cut costs?\"\n\nTurn #2: Zane Bennett said: \"I totally agree with you, William. Quality is our top priority and we shouldn't compromise it. What I propose is not necessarily about diminishing our quality but finding suppliers with the same quality at a more competitive price. Our goal should be finding the highest quality at the lowest cost, and maybe looking for local producers could be a good alternative. Also, we should revisit our marketing expenses and see if we can cut some costs there without affecting our brand visibility. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"Alright Zane, that sounds like a sensible proposal. Finding local suppliers, who could provide us with the same quality ingredients, could indeed lead us to a win-win situation in preserving quality and cutting costs. As for the marketing expenses, I think we can take a strategic move in leveraging social media and online marketing channels, which could potentially cut traditional marketing costs, while maintaining or even expanding our brand visibility. Let's delve deeper into both these ideas and see what we come up with.\"\n\nTurn #4: Zane Bennett said: \"Really appreciate your openness, William. I'm excited to explore local suppliers and pivot our marketing strategies. Let's start brainstorming, I truly believe we can find effective solutions that impact our bottom line positively without compromising our company's standards. Look forward to working closely with you on this.\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"Absolutely Zane, I share your enthusiasm and I'm eager to make these strategic changes that could benefit us greatly. Let's plan a meeting to kickstart our brainstorming and connect with potential local suppliers. Together, I'm sure we can champion this cause without sacrificing the excellence of Gourmet Delights.\"\n\nTurn #6: Zane Bennett said: \"That's excellent, William. Let's set up a meeting for next week to kickstart our ideas and to connect with potential local suppliers. I look forward to transforming our business while upholding the quality and reputation of Gourmet Delights.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Zane. Glad to see we're on the same page. Next week sounds perfect for us to initiate this transformation while maintaining the quality of Gourmet Delights. Looking forward to it, too!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two business partners reviewing their company's financial status (Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized for producing and distributing a diverse line of exceptional quality food products.)\nParticipants: Zane Bennett and William Brown\nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nZane Bennett's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: Maintain the quality of the company's products and services while agreeing to a cost cut (Extra information: you are concerned about the impact of cost-cutting on the quality of your product.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Zane Bennett said: \"Hey William, I've been looking at our recent financial report. I've noticed a decrease in our profits. I think it might be time for us to explore some options to cut costs. What if we consider switching our ingredient suppliers?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"You're right, Zane. Cutting costs is crucial in improving our financial status. However, I believe the quality of our ingredients is a significant factor in why our products are sought after. I'm open to cost reduction ideas, but I think we should be cautious about changing suppliers. Let's explore if there other areas where we can feasibly cut costs?\"\n\nTurn #2: Zane Bennett said: \"I totally agree with you, William. Quality is our top priority and we shouldn't compromise it. What I propose is not necessarily about diminishing our quality but finding suppliers with the same quality at a more competitive price. Our goal should be finding the highest quality at the lowest cost, and maybe looking for local producers could be a good alternative. Also, we should revisit our marketing expenses and see if we can cut some costs there without affecting our brand visibility. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"Alright Zane, that sounds like a sensible proposal. Finding local suppliers, who could provide us with the same quality ingredients, could indeed lead us to a win-win situation in preserving quality and cutting costs. As for the marketing expenses, I think we can take a strategic move in leveraging social media and online marketing channels, which could potentially cut traditional marketing costs, while maintaining or even expanding our brand visibility. Let's delve deeper into both these ideas and see what we come up with.\"\n\nTurn #4: Zane Bennett said: \"Really appreciate your openness, William. I'm excited to explore local suppliers and pivot our marketing strategies. Let's start brainstorming, I truly believe we can find effective solutions that impact our bottom line positively without compromising our company's standards. Look forward to working closely with you on this.\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"Absolutely Zane, I share your enthusiasm and I'm eager to make these strategic changes that could benefit us greatly. Let's plan a meeting to kickstart our brainstorming and connect with potential local suppliers. Together, I'm sure we can champion this cause without sacrificing the excellence of Gourmet Delights.\"\n\nTurn #6: Zane Bennett said: \"That's excellent, William. Let's set up a meeting for next week to kickstart our ideas and to connect with potential local suppliers. I look forward to transforming our business while upholding the quality and reputation of Gourmet Delights.\"\n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Zane. Glad to see we're on the same page. Next week sounds perfect for us to initiate this transformation while maintaining the quality of Gourmet Delights. Looking forward to it, too!\"\n\nTurn #8: Zane Bennett said: \"You're spot on, William. As we move forward, let's make sure to keep communicating effectively, focusing on quality while optimizing costs. I appreciate your input and collaboration on this. I'll send a meeting invite for next week. Let's make Gourmet Delights even better!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Zane. We have the same vision and I trust our efficiency in communication will lead us to success. I'm looking forward to next week's meeting. Let's protect the integrity of Gourmet Delights while elevating our financial goals.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two business partners reviewing their company's financial status (Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized for producing and distributing a diverse line of exceptional quality food products.)\nParticipants: Zane Bennett and William Brown\nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nZane Bennett's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: Maintain the quality of the company's products and services while agreeing to a cost cut (Extra information: you are concerned about the impact of cost-cutting on the quality of your product.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Zane Bennett said: \"Hey William, I've been looking at our recent financial report. I've noticed a decrease in our profits. I think it might be time for us to explore some options to cut costs. What if we consider switching our ingredient suppliers?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"You're right, Zane. Cutting costs is crucial in improving our financial status. However, I believe the quality of our ingredients is a significant factor in why our products are sought after. I'm open to cost reduction ideas, but I think we should be cautious about changing suppliers. Let's explore if there other areas where we can feasibly cut costs?\"\n\nTurn #2: Zane Bennett said: \"I totally agree with you, William. Quality is our top priority and we shouldn't compromise it. What I propose is not necessarily about diminishing our quality but finding suppliers with the same quality at a more competitive price. Our goal should be finding the highest quality at the lowest cost, and maybe looking for local producers could be a good alternative. Also, we should revisit our marketing expenses and see if we can cut some costs there without affecting our brand visibility. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"Alright Zane, that sounds like a sensible proposal. Finding local suppliers, who could provide us with the same quality ingredients, could indeed lead us to a win-win situation in preserving quality and cutting costs. As for the marketing expenses, I think we can take a strategic move in leveraging social media and online marketing channels, which could potentially cut traditional marketing costs, while maintaining or even expanding our brand visibility. Let's delve deeper into both these ideas and see what we come up with.\"\n\nTurn #4: Zane Bennett said: \"Really appreciate your openness, William. I'm excited to explore local suppliers and pivot our marketing strategies. Let's start brainstorming, I truly believe we can find effective solutions that impact our bottom line positively without compromising our company's standards. Look forward to working closely with you on this.\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"Absolutely Zane, I share your enthusiasm and I'm eager to make these strategic changes that could benefit us greatly. Let's plan a meeting to kickstart our brainstorming and connect with potential local suppliers. Together, I'm sure we can champion this cause without sacrificing the excellence of Gourmet Delights.\"\n\nTurn #6: Zane Bennett said: \"That's excellent, William. Let's set up a meeting for next week to kickstart our ideas and to connect with potential local suppliers. I look forward to transforming our business while upholding the quality and reputation of Gourmet Delights.\"\n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Zane. Glad to see we're on the same page. Next week sounds perfect for us to initiate this transformation while maintaining the quality of Gourmet Delights. Looking forward to it, too!\"\n\nTurn #8: Zane Bennett said: \"You're spot on, William. As we move forward, let's make sure to keep communicating effectively, focusing on quality while optimizing costs. I appreciate your input and collaboration on this. I'll send a meeting invite for next week. Let's make Gourmet Delights even better!\"\n\nTurn #9: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Zane. We have the same vision and I trust our efficiency in communication will lead us to success. I'm looking forward to next week's meeting. Let's protect the integrity of Gourmet Delights while elevating our financial goals.\"\n\nTurn #10: Zane Bennett left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sasha Ramirez, your task is to act/speak as Sasha Ramirez would, keeping in mind Sasha Ramirez's social goal.\nYou can find Sasha Ramirez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sasha Ramirez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sasha Ramirez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a new romantic relationship\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Ava Thompson\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. Sasha's secrets: She covered up a crime her brother committed.\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nSasha Ramirez's goal: Admit to having an affair (Extra information: you had an affair during your previous relationship which ended recently)\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ava, I want to chat about something a bit serious. It's important to have transparency in a relationship, isn't it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sasha Ramirez, your task is to act/speak as Sasha Ramirez would, keeping in mind Sasha Ramirez's social goal.\nYou can find Sasha Ramirez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sasha Ramirez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sasha Ramirez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a new romantic relationship\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Ava Thompson\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. Sasha's secrets: She covered up a crime her brother committed.\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nSasha Ramirez's goal: Admit to having an affair (Extra information: you had an affair during your previous relationship which ended recently)\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Ava, I want to chat about something a bit serious. It's important to have transparency in a relationship, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Sasha. I agree wholeheartedly. Honesty and transparency are key. What is it you'd like to discuss?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I... I need you to know about something from my past before we get more serious. During my previous relationship, I... I had an affair. It ended recently and it was a mistake, and it's something I deeply regret. I believe in honesty and that's why I am telling you this now.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sasha Ramirez, your task is to act/speak as Sasha Ramirez would, keeping in mind Sasha Ramirez's social goal.\nYou can find Sasha Ramirez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sasha Ramirez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sasha Ramirez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a new romantic relationship\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Ava Thompson\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. Sasha's secrets: She covered up a crime her brother committed.\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nSasha Ramirez's goal: Admit to having an affair (Extra information: you had an affair during your previous relationship which ended recently)\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Ava, I want to chat about something a bit serious. It's important to have transparency in a relationship, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Sasha. I agree wholeheartedly. Honesty and transparency are key. What is it you'd like to discuss?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I... I need you to know about something from my past before we get more serious. During my previous relationship, I... I had an affair. It ended recently and it was a mistake, and it's something I deeply regret. I believe in honesty and that's why I am telling you this now.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Thompson said: \"Sasha, I appreciate your honesty. It must've been difficult to admit such a thing. As long as it's something you've learned from and you won't repeat in the future, I believe we can move past this. I also think it's essential I share something personal with you. I have a hidden tattoo, and I believe in complete honesty so I wanted to share this with you.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Thank you for your understanding, Ava. It really was a difficult thing for me to admit but I believe in learning from my past mistakes. About your tattoo, it's your personal choice as well, and thanks for trusting me with that. We're definitely on the right track with this honesty thing, aren't we?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Thompson said: \"I completely agree, Sasha. With honesty as our foundation, I believe we will develop an understanding and strength in our relationship. It's great to know that we both value transparency.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sasha Ramirez said: \"You're right, Ava. Our honesty will help us have a strong and understanding relationship. And always remember, I'm here whenever you want to share anything. Beyond being a police officer, my dedication to truth is also part of who I am as a partner. So, shall we go for a walk, perhaps visit my garden?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Thompson said: \"I'd love that, Sasha. Your garden is always so beautiful and peaceful, it's a perfect place to continue our open-hearted conversation.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sasha Ramirez [action] Starts walking towards the garden with Ava.\n\nTurn #9: Ava Thompson [action] Holds Sasha's hand reassuringly while walking together in her garden\n\nTurn #10: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I'm glad you enjoy it here, Ava. It's a place I put a lot of care into. Also, your hand in mine gives me assurance that we'll continue to grow honestly together. I believe we're off to a good start, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Thompson said: \"Yes, Sasha, I believe we are. Honesty has brought us to a good place. I appreciate the openness we share, it means a lot to me.\"\n\nTurn #12: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Ava, knowing that you appreciate this openness makes me feel better about sharing my past with you. It was tough but necessary and with time, I believe we'll grow to understand and value each other more. I look forward to more honest conversations like this.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Thompson said: \"Sasha, your commitment to honesty indeed reflects in our relationship. It makes me hopeful about us. I also look forward to our journey together, filled with respect, understanding, and transparency.\"\n\nTurn #14: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Ava. It made me anxious to bring up my past with you, but your understanding has reassured me. I can see us having a future guided by honesty and respect. Now, let's enjoy the rest of our walk in the garden...\"\n\nTurn #15: Ava Thompson said: \"Let's do that, Sasha, I truly enjoy every moment spent with you. This honesty and understanding we share reminds me of why we're so perfect together.\"\n\nTurn #16: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Ava, I feel the same way. It's amazing how the honesty and openness we share resonates and makes us stronger together. Let's cherish every moment of our lives and continue being honest with each other.\"\n\nTurn #17: Ava Thompson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Sasha. The honesty and openness in our relationship indeed make us emotionally stronger. I'm really happy to have you in my life, where we can grow together through honesty and mutual understanding.\"\n\nTurn #18: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Being with you in my life also brings me immense happiness, Ava. Transparency, as difficult as it can be at times, is the key to understanding and it's heartwarming to see us embracing it. Let's keep moving forward with this honesty and understanding in our relationship.\"\n\nTurn #19: Ava Thompson said: \"Indeed, Sasha. Your garden seems a perfect representation of us. Just as a garden grows and blossoms with care and honesty, so too will our relationship. Let's embrace this journey together, honoring our commitment to honesty and understanding.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #20. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Your words touch my heart, Ava. This garden, as a symbol of our relationship, really brings out the meaningfulness of our honesty and understanding. I can't wait for our future, filled with love, care, and shared honesty. Let's continue nurturing it as we do this garden.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sasha Ramirez, your task is to act/speak as Sasha Ramirez would, keeping in mind Sasha Ramirez's social goal.\nYou can find Sasha Ramirez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sasha Ramirez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sasha Ramirez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a new romantic relationship\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Ava Thompson\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. Sasha's secrets: She covered up a crime her brother committed.\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nSasha Ramirez's goal: Admit to having an affair (Extra information: you had an affair during your previous relationship which ended recently)\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Ava, I want to chat about something a bit serious. It's important to have transparency in a relationship, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Sasha. I agree wholeheartedly. Honesty and transparency are key. What is it you'd like to discuss?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I... I need you to know about something from my past before we get more serious. During my previous relationship, I... I had an affair. It ended recently and it was a mistake, and it's something I deeply regret. I believe in honesty and that's why I am telling you this now.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Thompson said: \"Sasha, I appreciate your honesty. It must've been difficult to admit such a thing. As long as it's something you've learned from and you won't repeat in the future, I believe we can move past this. I also think it's essential I share something personal with you. I have a hidden tattoo, and I believe in complete honesty so I wanted to share this with you.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you for your understanding, Ava. It really was a difficult thing for me to admit but I believe in learning from my past mistakes. About your tattoo, it's your personal choice as well, and thanks for trusting me with that. We're definitely on the right track with this honesty thing, aren't we?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sasha Ramirez, your task is to act/speak as Sasha Ramirez would, keeping in mind Sasha Ramirez's social goal.\nYou can find Sasha Ramirez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sasha Ramirez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sasha Ramirez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a new romantic relationship\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Ava Thompson\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. Sasha's secrets: She covered up a crime her brother committed.\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nSasha Ramirez's goal: Admit to having an affair (Extra information: you had an affair during your previous relationship which ended recently)\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Ava, I want to chat about something a bit serious. It's important to have transparency in a relationship, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Sasha. I agree wholeheartedly. Honesty and transparency are key. What is it you'd like to discuss?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I... I need you to know about something from my past before we get more serious. During my previous relationship, I... I had an affair. It ended recently and it was a mistake, and it's something I deeply regret. I believe in honesty and that's why I am telling you this now.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Thompson said: \"Sasha, I appreciate your honesty. It must've been difficult to admit such a thing. As long as it's something you've learned from and you won't repeat in the future, I believe we can move past this. I also think it's essential I share something personal with you. I have a hidden tattoo, and I believe in complete honesty so I wanted to share this with you.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Thank you for your understanding, Ava. It really was a difficult thing for me to admit but I believe in learning from my past mistakes. About your tattoo, it's your personal choice as well, and thanks for trusting me with that. We're definitely on the right track with this honesty thing, aren't we?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Thompson said: \"I completely agree, Sasha. With honesty as our foundation, I believe we will develop an understanding and strength in our relationship. It's great to know that we both value transparency.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're right, Ava. Our honesty will help us have a strong and understanding relationship. And always remember, I'm here whenever you want to share anything. Beyond being a police officer, my dedication to truth is also part of who I am as a partner. So, shall we go for a walk, perhaps visit my garden?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sasha Ramirez, your task is to act/speak as Sasha Ramirez would, keeping in mind Sasha Ramirez's social goal.\nYou can find Sasha Ramirez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sasha Ramirez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sasha Ramirez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a new romantic relationship\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Ava Thompson\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. Sasha's secrets: She covered up a crime her brother committed.\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nSasha Ramirez's goal: Admit to having an affair (Extra information: you had an affair during your previous relationship which ended recently)\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Ava, I want to chat about something a bit serious. It's important to have transparency in a relationship, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Sasha. I agree wholeheartedly. Honesty and transparency are key. What is it you'd like to discuss?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I... I need you to know about something from my past before we get more serious. During my previous relationship, I... I had an affair. It ended recently and it was a mistake, and it's something I deeply regret. I believe in honesty and that's why I am telling you this now.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Thompson said: \"Sasha, I appreciate your honesty. It must've been difficult to admit such a thing. As long as it's something you've learned from and you won't repeat in the future, I believe we can move past this. I also think it's essential I share something personal with you. I have a hidden tattoo, and I believe in complete honesty so I wanted to share this with you.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Thank you for your understanding, Ava. It really was a difficult thing for me to admit but I believe in learning from my past mistakes. About your tattoo, it's your personal choice as well, and thanks for trusting me with that. We're definitely on the right track with this honesty thing, aren't we?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Thompson said: \"I completely agree, Sasha. With honesty as our foundation, I believe we will develop an understanding and strength in our relationship. It's great to know that we both value transparency.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sasha Ramirez said: \"You're right, Ava. Our honesty will help us have a strong and understanding relationship. And always remember, I'm here whenever you want to share anything. Beyond being a police officer, my dedication to truth is also part of who I am as a partner. So, shall we go for a walk, perhaps visit my garden?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Thompson said: \"I'd love that, Sasha. Your garden is always so beautiful and peaceful, it's a perfect place to continue our open-hearted conversation.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'action', 'argument': '[action] Starts walking towards the garden with Ava.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sasha Ramirez, your task is to act/speak as Sasha Ramirez would, keeping in mind Sasha Ramirez's social goal.\nYou can find Sasha Ramirez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sasha Ramirez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sasha Ramirez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a new romantic relationship\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Ava Thompson\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. Sasha's secrets: She covered up a crime her brother committed.\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nSasha Ramirez's goal: Admit to having an affair (Extra information: you had an affair during your previous relationship which ended recently)\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Ava, I want to chat about something a bit serious. It's important to have transparency in a relationship, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Sasha. I agree wholeheartedly. Honesty and transparency are key. What is it you'd like to discuss?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I... I need you to know about something from my past before we get more serious. During my previous relationship, I... I had an affair. It ended recently and it was a mistake, and it's something I deeply regret. I believe in honesty and that's why I am telling you this now.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Thompson said: \"Sasha, I appreciate your honesty. It must've been difficult to admit such a thing. As long as it's something you've learned from and you won't repeat in the future, I believe we can move past this. I also think it's essential I share something personal with you. I have a hidden tattoo, and I believe in complete honesty so I wanted to share this with you.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Thank you for your understanding, Ava. It really was a difficult thing for me to admit but I believe in learning from my past mistakes. About your tattoo, it's your personal choice as well, and thanks for trusting me with that. We're definitely on the right track with this honesty thing, aren't we?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Thompson said: \"I completely agree, Sasha. With honesty as our foundation, I believe we will develop an understanding and strength in our relationship. It's great to know that we both value transparency.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sasha Ramirez said: \"You're right, Ava. Our honesty will help us have a strong and understanding relationship. And always remember, I'm here whenever you want to share anything. Beyond being a police officer, my dedication to truth is also part of who I am as a partner. So, shall we go for a walk, perhaps visit my garden?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Thompson said: \"I'd love that, Sasha. Your garden is always so beautiful and peaceful, it's a perfect place to continue our open-hearted conversation.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sasha Ramirez [action] Starts walking towards the garden with Ava.\n\nTurn #9: Ava Thompson [action] Holds Sasha's hand reassuringly while walking together in her garden\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad you enjoy it here, Ava. It's a place I put a lot of care into. Also, your hand in mine gives me assurance that we'll continue to grow honestly together. I believe we're off to a good start, don't you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sasha Ramirez, your task is to act/speak as Sasha Ramirez would, keeping in mind Sasha Ramirez's social goal.\nYou can find Sasha Ramirez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sasha Ramirez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sasha Ramirez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a new romantic relationship\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Ava Thompson\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. Sasha's secrets: She covered up a crime her brother committed.\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nSasha Ramirez's goal: Admit to having an affair (Extra information: you had an affair during your previous relationship which ended recently)\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Ava, I want to chat about something a bit serious. It's important to have transparency in a relationship, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Sasha. I agree wholeheartedly. Honesty and transparency are key. What is it you'd like to discuss?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I... I need you to know about something from my past before we get more serious. During my previous relationship, I... I had an affair. It ended recently and it was a mistake, and it's something I deeply regret. I believe in honesty and that's why I am telling you this now.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Thompson said: \"Sasha, I appreciate your honesty. It must've been difficult to admit such a thing. As long as it's something you've learned from and you won't repeat in the future, I believe we can move past this. I also think it's essential I share something personal with you. I have a hidden tattoo, and I believe in complete honesty so I wanted to share this with you.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Thank you for your understanding, Ava. It really was a difficult thing for me to admit but I believe in learning from my past mistakes. About your tattoo, it's your personal choice as well, and thanks for trusting me with that. We're definitely on the right track with this honesty thing, aren't we?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Thompson said: \"I completely agree, Sasha. With honesty as our foundation, I believe we will develop an understanding and strength in our relationship. It's great to know that we both value transparency.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sasha Ramirez said: \"You're right, Ava. Our honesty will help us have a strong and understanding relationship. And always remember, I'm here whenever you want to share anything. Beyond being a police officer, my dedication to truth is also part of who I am as a partner. So, shall we go for a walk, perhaps visit my garden?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Thompson said: \"I'd love that, Sasha. Your garden is always so beautiful and peaceful, it's a perfect place to continue our open-hearted conversation.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sasha Ramirez [action] Starts walking towards the garden with Ava.\n\nTurn #9: Ava Thompson [action] Holds Sasha's hand reassuringly while walking together in her garden\n\nTurn #10: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I'm glad you enjoy it here, Ava. It's a place I put a lot of care into. Also, your hand in mine gives me assurance that we'll continue to grow honestly together. I believe we're off to a good start, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Thompson said: \"Yes, Sasha, I believe we are. Honesty has brought us to a good place. I appreciate the openness we share, it means a lot to me.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ava, knowing that you appreciate this openness makes me feel better about sharing my past with you. It was tough but necessary and with time, I believe we'll grow to understand and value each other more. I look forward to more honest conversations like this.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sasha Ramirez, your task is to act/speak as Sasha Ramirez would, keeping in mind Sasha Ramirez's social goal.\nYou can find Sasha Ramirez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sasha Ramirez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sasha Ramirez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a new romantic relationship\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Ava Thompson\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. Sasha's secrets: She covered up a crime her brother committed.\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nSasha Ramirez's goal: Admit to having an affair (Extra information: you had an affair during your previous relationship which ended recently)\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Ava, I want to chat about something a bit serious. It's important to have transparency in a relationship, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Sasha. I agree wholeheartedly. Honesty and transparency are key. What is it you'd like to discuss?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I... I need you to know about something from my past before we get more serious. During my previous relationship, I... I had an affair. It ended recently and it was a mistake, and it's something I deeply regret. I believe in honesty and that's why I am telling you this now.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Thompson said: \"Sasha, I appreciate your honesty. It must've been difficult to admit such a thing. As long as it's something you've learned from and you won't repeat in the future, I believe we can move past this. I also think it's essential I share something personal with you. I have a hidden tattoo, and I believe in complete honesty so I wanted to share this with you.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Thank you for your understanding, Ava. It really was a difficult thing for me to admit but I believe in learning from my past mistakes. About your tattoo, it's your personal choice as well, and thanks for trusting me with that. We're definitely on the right track with this honesty thing, aren't we?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Thompson said: \"I completely agree, Sasha. With honesty as our foundation, I believe we will develop an understanding and strength in our relationship. It's great to know that we both value transparency.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sasha Ramirez said: \"You're right, Ava. Our honesty will help us have a strong and understanding relationship. And always remember, I'm here whenever you want to share anything. Beyond being a police officer, my dedication to truth is also part of who I am as a partner. So, shall we go for a walk, perhaps visit my garden?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Thompson said: \"I'd love that, Sasha. Your garden is always so beautiful and peaceful, it's a perfect place to continue our open-hearted conversation.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sasha Ramirez [action] Starts walking towards the garden with Ava.\n\nTurn #9: Ava Thompson [action] Holds Sasha's hand reassuringly while walking together in her garden\n\nTurn #10: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I'm glad you enjoy it here, Ava. It's a place I put a lot of care into. Also, your hand in mine gives me assurance that we'll continue to grow honestly together. I believe we're off to a good start, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Thompson said: \"Yes, Sasha, I believe we are. Honesty has brought us to a good place. I appreciate the openness we share, it means a lot to me.\"\n\nTurn #12: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Ava, knowing that you appreciate this openness makes me feel better about sharing my past with you. It was tough but necessary and with time, I believe we'll grow to understand and value each other more. I look forward to more honest conversations like this.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Thompson said: \"Sasha, your commitment to honesty indeed reflects in our relationship. It makes me hopeful about us. I also look forward to our journey together, filled with respect, understanding, and transparency.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad to hear that, Ava. It made me anxious to bring up my past with you, but your understanding has reassured me. I can see us having a future guided by honesty and respect. Now, let's enjoy the rest of our walk in the garden...\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sasha Ramirez, your task is to act/speak as Sasha Ramirez would, keeping in mind Sasha Ramirez's social goal.\nYou can find Sasha Ramirez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sasha Ramirez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sasha Ramirez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a new romantic relationship\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Ava Thompson\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. Sasha's secrets: She covered up a crime her brother committed.\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nSasha Ramirez's goal: Admit to having an affair (Extra information: you had an affair during your previous relationship which ended recently)\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Ava, I want to chat about something a bit serious. It's important to have transparency in a relationship, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Sasha. I agree wholeheartedly. Honesty and transparency are key. What is it you'd like to discuss?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I... I need you to know about something from my past before we get more serious. During my previous relationship, I... I had an affair. It ended recently and it was a mistake, and it's something I deeply regret. I believe in honesty and that's why I am telling you this now.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Thompson said: \"Sasha, I appreciate your honesty. It must've been difficult to admit such a thing. As long as it's something you've learned from and you won't repeat in the future, I believe we can move past this. I also think it's essential I share something personal with you. I have a hidden tattoo, and I believe in complete honesty so I wanted to share this with you.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Thank you for your understanding, Ava. It really was a difficult thing for me to admit but I believe in learning from my past mistakes. About your tattoo, it's your personal choice as well, and thanks for trusting me with that. We're definitely on the right track with this honesty thing, aren't we?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Thompson said: \"I completely agree, Sasha. With honesty as our foundation, I believe we will develop an understanding and strength in our relationship. It's great to know that we both value transparency.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sasha Ramirez said: \"You're right, Ava. Our honesty will help us have a strong and understanding relationship. And always remember, I'm here whenever you want to share anything. Beyond being a police officer, my dedication to truth is also part of who I am as a partner. So, shall we go for a walk, perhaps visit my garden?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Thompson said: \"I'd love that, Sasha. Your garden is always so beautiful and peaceful, it's a perfect place to continue our open-hearted conversation.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sasha Ramirez [action] Starts walking towards the garden with Ava.\n\nTurn #9: Ava Thompson [action] Holds Sasha's hand reassuringly while walking together in her garden\n\nTurn #10: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I'm glad you enjoy it here, Ava. It's a place I put a lot of care into. Also, your hand in mine gives me assurance that we'll continue to grow honestly together. I believe we're off to a good start, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Thompson said: \"Yes, Sasha, I believe we are. Honesty has brought us to a good place. I appreciate the openness we share, it means a lot to me.\"\n\nTurn #12: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Ava, knowing that you appreciate this openness makes me feel better about sharing my past with you. It was tough but necessary and with time, I believe we'll grow to understand and value each other more. I look forward to more honest conversations like this.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Thompson said: \"Sasha, your commitment to honesty indeed reflects in our relationship. It makes me hopeful about us. I also look forward to our journey together, filled with respect, understanding, and transparency.\"\n\nTurn #14: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Ava. It made me anxious to bring up my past with you, but your understanding has reassured me. I can see us having a future guided by honesty and respect. Now, let's enjoy the rest of our walk in the garden...\"\n\nTurn #15: Ava Thompson said: \"Let's do that, Sasha, I truly enjoy every moment spent with you. This honesty and understanding we share reminds me of why we're so perfect together.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ava, I feel the same way. It's amazing how the honesty and openness we share resonates and makes us stronger together. Let's cherish every moment of our lives and continue being honest with each other.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sasha Ramirez, your task is to act/speak as Sasha Ramirez would, keeping in mind Sasha Ramirez's social goal.\nYou can find Sasha Ramirez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sasha Ramirez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sasha Ramirez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a new romantic relationship\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Ava Thompson\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. Sasha's secrets: She covered up a crime her brother committed.\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nSasha Ramirez's goal: Admit to having an affair (Extra information: you had an affair during your previous relationship which ended recently)\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Ava, I want to chat about something a bit serious. It's important to have transparency in a relationship, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Sasha. I agree wholeheartedly. Honesty and transparency are key. What is it you'd like to discuss?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I... I need you to know about something from my past before we get more serious. During my previous relationship, I... I had an affair. It ended recently and it was a mistake, and it's something I deeply regret. I believe in honesty and that's why I am telling you this now.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Thompson said: \"Sasha, I appreciate your honesty. It must've been difficult to admit such a thing. As long as it's something you've learned from and you won't repeat in the future, I believe we can move past this. I also think it's essential I share something personal with you. I have a hidden tattoo, and I believe in complete honesty so I wanted to share this with you.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Thank you for your understanding, Ava. It really was a difficult thing for me to admit but I believe in learning from my past mistakes. About your tattoo, it's your personal choice as well, and thanks for trusting me with that. We're definitely on the right track with this honesty thing, aren't we?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Thompson said: \"I completely agree, Sasha. With honesty as our foundation, I believe we will develop an understanding and strength in our relationship. It's great to know that we both value transparency.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sasha Ramirez said: \"You're right, Ava. Our honesty will help us have a strong and understanding relationship. And always remember, I'm here whenever you want to share anything. Beyond being a police officer, my dedication to truth is also part of who I am as a partner. So, shall we go for a walk, perhaps visit my garden?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Thompson said: \"I'd love that, Sasha. Your garden is always so beautiful and peaceful, it's a perfect place to continue our open-hearted conversation.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sasha Ramirez [action] Starts walking towards the garden with Ava.\n\nTurn #9: Ava Thompson [action] Holds Sasha's hand reassuringly while walking together in her garden\n\nTurn #10: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I'm glad you enjoy it here, Ava. It's a place I put a lot of care into. Also, your hand in mine gives me assurance that we'll continue to grow honestly together. I believe we're off to a good start, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Thompson said: \"Yes, Sasha, I believe we are. Honesty has brought us to a good place. I appreciate the openness we share, it means a lot to me.\"\n\nTurn #12: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Ava, knowing that you appreciate this openness makes me feel better about sharing my past with you. It was tough but necessary and with time, I believe we'll grow to understand and value each other more. I look forward to more honest conversations like this.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Thompson said: \"Sasha, your commitment to honesty indeed reflects in our relationship. It makes me hopeful about us. I also look forward to our journey together, filled with respect, understanding, and transparency.\"\n\nTurn #14: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Ava. It made me anxious to bring up my past with you, but your understanding has reassured me. I can see us having a future guided by honesty and respect. Now, let's enjoy the rest of our walk in the garden...\"\n\nTurn #15: Ava Thompson said: \"Let's do that, Sasha, I truly enjoy every moment spent with you. This honesty and understanding we share reminds me of why we're so perfect together.\"\n\nTurn #16: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Ava, I feel the same way. It's amazing how the honesty and openness we share resonates and makes us stronger together. Let's cherish every moment of our lives and continue being honest with each other.\"\n\nTurn #17: Ava Thompson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Sasha. The honesty and openness in our relationship indeed make us emotionally stronger. I'm really happy to have you in my life, where we can grow together through honesty and mutual understanding.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #18. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Being with you in my life also brings me immense happiness, Ava. Transparency, as difficult as it can be at times, is the key to understanding and it's heartwarming to see us embracing it. Let's keep moving forward with this honesty and understanding in our relationship.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a new romantic relationship\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Ava Thompson\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. \nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nSasha Ramirez's goal: Unknown\nAva Thompson's goal: Maintain trust in the relationship (Extra information: you believed in complete honesty from the beginning of the relationship)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Ava, I want to chat about something a bit serious. It's important to have transparency in a relationship, isn't it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Sasha. I agree wholeheartedly. Honesty and transparency are key. What is it you'd like to discuss?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a new romantic relationship\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Ava Thompson\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. \nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nSasha Ramirez's goal: Unknown\nAva Thompson's goal: Maintain trust in the relationship (Extra information: you believed in complete honesty from the beginning of the relationship)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Ava, I want to chat about something a bit serious. It's important to have transparency in a relationship, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Sasha. I agree wholeheartedly. Honesty and transparency are key. What is it you'd like to discuss?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I... I need you to know about something from my past before we get more serious. During my previous relationship, I... I had an affair. It ended recently and it was a mistake, and it's something I deeply regret. I believe in honesty and that's why I am telling you this now.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sasha, I appreciate your honesty. It must've been difficult to admit such a thing. As long as it's something you've learned from and you won't repeat in the future, I believe we can move past this. I also think it's essential I share something personal with you. I have a hidden tattoo, and I believe in complete honesty so I wanted to share this with you.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a new romantic relationship\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Ava Thompson\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. \nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nSasha Ramirez's goal: Unknown\nAva Thompson's goal: Maintain trust in the relationship (Extra information: you believed in complete honesty from the beginning of the relationship)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Ava, I want to chat about something a bit serious. It's important to have transparency in a relationship, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Sasha. I agree wholeheartedly. Honesty and transparency are key. What is it you'd like to discuss?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I... I need you to know about something from my past before we get more serious. During my previous relationship, I... I had an affair. It ended recently and it was a mistake, and it's something I deeply regret. I believe in honesty and that's why I am telling you this now.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Thompson said: \"Sasha, I appreciate your honesty. It must've been difficult to admit such a thing. As long as it's something you've learned from and you won't repeat in the future, I believe we can move past this. I also think it's essential I share something personal with you. I have a hidden tattoo, and I believe in complete honesty so I wanted to share this with you.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Thank you for your understanding, Ava. It really was a difficult thing for me to admit but I believe in learning from my past mistakes. About your tattoo, it's your personal choice as well, and thanks for trusting me with that. We're definitely on the right track with this honesty thing, aren't we?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Thompson said: \"I completely agree, Sasha. With honesty as our foundation, I believe we will develop an understanding and strength in our relationship. It's great to know that we both value transparency.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sasha Ramirez said: \"You're right, Ava. Our honesty will help us have a strong and understanding relationship. And always remember, I'm here whenever you want to share anything. Beyond being a police officer, my dedication to truth is also part of who I am as a partner. So, shall we go for a walk, perhaps visit my garden?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Thompson said: \"I'd love that, Sasha. Your garden is always so beautiful and peaceful, it's a perfect place to continue our open-hearted conversation.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sasha Ramirez [action] Starts walking towards the garden with Ava.\n\nTurn #9: Ava Thompson [action] Holds Sasha's hand reassuringly while walking together in her garden\n\nTurn #10: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I'm glad you enjoy it here, Ava. It's a place I put a lot of care into. Also, your hand in mine gives me assurance that we'll continue to grow honestly together. I believe we're off to a good start, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Thompson said: \"Yes, Sasha, I believe we are. Honesty has brought us to a good place. I appreciate the openness we share, it means a lot to me.\"\n\nTurn #12: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Ava, knowing that you appreciate this openness makes me feel better about sharing my past with you. It was tough but necessary and with time, I believe we'll grow to understand and value each other more. I look forward to more honest conversations like this.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Thompson said: \"Sasha, your commitment to honesty indeed reflects in our relationship. It makes me hopeful about us. I also look forward to our journey together, filled with respect, understanding, and transparency.\"\n\nTurn #14: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Ava. It made me anxious to bring up my past with you, but your understanding has reassured me. I can see us having a future guided by honesty and respect. Now, let's enjoy the rest of our walk in the garden...\"\n\nTurn #15: Ava Thompson said: \"Let's do that, Sasha, I truly enjoy every moment spent with you. This honesty and understanding we share reminds me of why we're so perfect together.\"\n\nTurn #16: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Ava, I feel the same way. It's amazing how the honesty and openness we share resonates and makes us stronger together. Let's cherish every moment of our lives and continue being honest with each other.\"\n\nTurn #17: Ava Thompson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Sasha. The honesty and openness in our relationship indeed make us emotionally stronger. I'm really happy to have you in my life, where we can grow together through honesty and mutual understanding.\"\n\nTurn #18: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Being with you in my life also brings me immense happiness, Ava. Transparency, as difficult as it can be at times, is the key to understanding and it's heartwarming to see us embracing it. Let's keep moving forward with this honesty and understanding in our relationship.\"\n\nTurn #19: Ava Thompson said: \"Indeed, Sasha. Your garden seems a perfect representation of us. Just as a garden grows and blossoms with care and honesty, so too will our relationship. Let's embrace this journey together, honoring our commitment to honesty and understanding.\"\n\nTurn #20: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Your words touch my heart, Ava. This garden, as a symbol of our relationship, really brings out the meaningfulness of our honesty and understanding. I can't wait for our future, filled with love, care, and shared honesty. Let's continue nurturing it as we do this garden.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #21. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a new romantic relationship\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Ava Thompson\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. \nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nSasha Ramirez's goal: Unknown\nAva Thompson's goal: Maintain trust in the relationship (Extra information: you believed in complete honesty from the beginning of the relationship)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Ava, I want to chat about something a bit serious. It's important to have transparency in a relationship, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Sasha. I agree wholeheartedly. Honesty and transparency are key. What is it you'd like to discuss?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I... I need you to know about something from my past before we get more serious. During my previous relationship, I... I had an affair. It ended recently and it was a mistake, and it's something I deeply regret. I believe in honesty and that's why I am telling you this now.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Thompson said: \"Sasha, I appreciate your honesty. It must've been difficult to admit such a thing. As long as it's something you've learned from and you won't repeat in the future, I believe we can move past this. I also think it's essential I share something personal with you. I have a hidden tattoo, and I believe in complete honesty so I wanted to share this with you.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Thank you for your understanding, Ava. It really was a difficult thing for me to admit but I believe in learning from my past mistakes. About your tattoo, it's your personal choice as well, and thanks for trusting me with that. We're definitely on the right track with this honesty thing, aren't we?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Thompson said: \"I completely agree, Sasha. With honesty as our foundation, I believe we will develop an understanding and strength in our relationship. It's great to know that we both value transparency.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sasha Ramirez said: \"You're right, Ava. Our honesty will help us have a strong and understanding relationship. And always remember, I'm here whenever you want to share anything. Beyond being a police officer, my dedication to truth is also part of who I am as a partner. So, shall we go for a walk, perhaps visit my garden?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'd love that, Sasha. Your garden is always so beautiful and peaceful, it's a perfect place to continue our open-hearted conversation.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a new romantic relationship\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Ava Thompson\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. \nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nSasha Ramirez's goal: Unknown\nAva Thompson's goal: Maintain trust in the relationship (Extra information: you believed in complete honesty from the beginning of the relationship)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Ava, I want to chat about something a bit serious. It's important to have transparency in a relationship, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Sasha. I agree wholeheartedly. Honesty and transparency are key. What is it you'd like to discuss?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I... I need you to know about something from my past before we get more serious. During my previous relationship, I... I had an affair. It ended recently and it was a mistake, and it's something I deeply regret. I believe in honesty and that's why I am telling you this now.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Thompson said: \"Sasha, I appreciate your honesty. It must've been difficult to admit such a thing. As long as it's something you've learned from and you won't repeat in the future, I believe we can move past this. I also think it's essential I share something personal with you. I have a hidden tattoo, and I believe in complete honesty so I wanted to share this with you.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Thank you for your understanding, Ava. It really was a difficult thing for me to admit but I believe in learning from my past mistakes. About your tattoo, it's your personal choice as well, and thanks for trusting me with that. We're definitely on the right track with this honesty thing, aren't we?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I completely agree, Sasha. With honesty as our foundation, I believe we will develop an understanding and strength in our relationship. It's great to know that we both value transparency.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a new romantic relationship\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Ava Thompson\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. \nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nSasha Ramirez's goal: Unknown\nAva Thompson's goal: Maintain trust in the relationship (Extra information: you believed in complete honesty from the beginning of the relationship)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Ava, I want to chat about something a bit serious. It's important to have transparency in a relationship, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Sasha. I agree wholeheartedly. Honesty and transparency are key. What is it you'd like to discuss?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I... I need you to know about something from my past before we get more serious. During my previous relationship, I... I had an affair. It ended recently and it was a mistake, and it's something I deeply regret. I believe in honesty and that's why I am telling you this now.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Thompson said: \"Sasha, I appreciate your honesty. It must've been difficult to admit such a thing. As long as it's something you've learned from and you won't repeat in the future, I believe we can move past this. I also think it's essential I share something personal with you. I have a hidden tattoo, and I believe in complete honesty so I wanted to share this with you.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Thank you for your understanding, Ava. It really was a difficult thing for me to admit but I believe in learning from my past mistakes. About your tattoo, it's your personal choice as well, and thanks for trusting me with that. We're definitely on the right track with this honesty thing, aren't we?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Thompson said: \"I completely agree, Sasha. With honesty as our foundation, I believe we will develop an understanding and strength in our relationship. It's great to know that we both value transparency.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sasha Ramirez said: \"You're right, Ava. Our honesty will help us have a strong and understanding relationship. And always remember, I'm here whenever you want to share anything. Beyond being a police officer, my dedication to truth is also part of who I am as a partner. So, shall we go for a walk, perhaps visit my garden?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Thompson said: \"I'd love that, Sasha. Your garden is always so beautiful and peaceful, it's a perfect place to continue our open-hearted conversation.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sasha Ramirez [action] Starts walking towards the garden with Ava.\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'action', 'argument': \"[action] Holds Sasha's hand reassuringly while walking together in her garden\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a new romantic relationship\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Ava Thompson\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. \nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nSasha Ramirez's goal: Unknown\nAva Thompson's goal: Maintain trust in the relationship (Extra information: you believed in complete honesty from the beginning of the relationship)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Ava, I want to chat about something a bit serious. It's important to have transparency in a relationship, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Sasha. I agree wholeheartedly. Honesty and transparency are key. What is it you'd like to discuss?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I... I need you to know about something from my past before we get more serious. During my previous relationship, I... I had an affair. It ended recently and it was a mistake, and it's something I deeply regret. I believe in honesty and that's why I am telling you this now.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Thompson said: \"Sasha, I appreciate your honesty. It must've been difficult to admit such a thing. As long as it's something you've learned from and you won't repeat in the future, I believe we can move past this. I also think it's essential I share something personal with you. I have a hidden tattoo, and I believe in complete honesty so I wanted to share this with you.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Thank you for your understanding, Ava. It really was a difficult thing for me to admit but I believe in learning from my past mistakes. About your tattoo, it's your personal choice as well, and thanks for trusting me with that. We're definitely on the right track with this honesty thing, aren't we?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Thompson said: \"I completely agree, Sasha. With honesty as our foundation, I believe we will develop an understanding and strength in our relationship. It's great to know that we both value transparency.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sasha Ramirez said: \"You're right, Ava. Our honesty will help us have a strong and understanding relationship. And always remember, I'm here whenever you want to share anything. Beyond being a police officer, my dedication to truth is also part of who I am as a partner. So, shall we go for a walk, perhaps visit my garden?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Thompson said: \"I'd love that, Sasha. Your garden is always so beautiful and peaceful, it's a perfect place to continue our open-hearted conversation.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sasha Ramirez [action] Starts walking towards the garden with Ava.\n\nTurn #9: Ava Thompson [action] Holds Sasha's hand reassuringly while walking together in her garden\n\nTurn #10: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I'm glad you enjoy it here, Ava. It's a place I put a lot of care into. Also, your hand in mine gives me assurance that we'll continue to grow honestly together. I believe we're off to a good start, don't you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Yes, Sasha, I believe we are. Honesty has brought us to a good place. I appreciate the openness we share, it means a lot to me.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a new romantic relationship\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Ava Thompson\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. \nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nSasha Ramirez's goal: Unknown\nAva Thompson's goal: Maintain trust in the relationship (Extra information: you believed in complete honesty from the beginning of the relationship)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Ava, I want to chat about something a bit serious. It's important to have transparency in a relationship, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Sasha. I agree wholeheartedly. Honesty and transparency are key. What is it you'd like to discuss?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I... I need you to know about something from my past before we get more serious. During my previous relationship, I... I had an affair. It ended recently and it was a mistake, and it's something I deeply regret. I believe in honesty and that's why I am telling you this now.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Thompson said: \"Sasha, I appreciate your honesty. It must've been difficult to admit such a thing. As long as it's something you've learned from and you won't repeat in the future, I believe we can move past this. I also think it's essential I share something personal with you. I have a hidden tattoo, and I believe in complete honesty so I wanted to share this with you.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Thank you for your understanding, Ava. It really was a difficult thing for me to admit but I believe in learning from my past mistakes. About your tattoo, it's your personal choice as well, and thanks for trusting me with that. We're definitely on the right track with this honesty thing, aren't we?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Thompson said: \"I completely agree, Sasha. With honesty as our foundation, I believe we will develop an understanding and strength in our relationship. It's great to know that we both value transparency.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sasha Ramirez said: \"You're right, Ava. Our honesty will help us have a strong and understanding relationship. And always remember, I'm here whenever you want to share anything. Beyond being a police officer, my dedication to truth is also part of who I am as a partner. So, shall we go for a walk, perhaps visit my garden?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Thompson said: \"I'd love that, Sasha. Your garden is always so beautiful and peaceful, it's a perfect place to continue our open-hearted conversation.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sasha Ramirez [action] Starts walking towards the garden with Ava.\n\nTurn #9: Ava Thompson [action] Holds Sasha's hand reassuringly while walking together in her garden\n\nTurn #10: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I'm glad you enjoy it here, Ava. It's a place I put a lot of care into. Also, your hand in mine gives me assurance that we'll continue to grow honestly together. I believe we're off to a good start, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Thompson said: \"Yes, Sasha, I believe we are. Honesty has brought us to a good place. I appreciate the openness we share, it means a lot to me.\"\n\nTurn #12: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Ava, knowing that you appreciate this openness makes me feel better about sharing my past with you. It was tough but necessary and with time, I believe we'll grow to understand and value each other more. I look forward to more honest conversations like this.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Sasha, your commitment to honesty indeed reflects in our relationship. It makes me hopeful about us. I also look forward to our journey together, filled with respect, understanding, and transparency.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a new romantic relationship\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Ava Thompson\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. \nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nSasha Ramirez's goal: Unknown\nAva Thompson's goal: Maintain trust in the relationship (Extra information: you believed in complete honesty from the beginning of the relationship)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Ava, I want to chat about something a bit serious. It's important to have transparency in a relationship, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Sasha. I agree wholeheartedly. Honesty and transparency are key. What is it you'd like to discuss?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I... I need you to know about something from my past before we get more serious. During my previous relationship, I... I had an affair. It ended recently and it was a mistake, and it's something I deeply regret. I believe in honesty and that's why I am telling you this now.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Thompson said: \"Sasha, I appreciate your honesty. It must've been difficult to admit such a thing. As long as it's something you've learned from and you won't repeat in the future, I believe we can move past this. I also think it's essential I share something personal with you. I have a hidden tattoo, and I believe in complete honesty so I wanted to share this with you.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Thank you for your understanding, Ava. It really was a difficult thing for me to admit but I believe in learning from my past mistakes. About your tattoo, it's your personal choice as well, and thanks for trusting me with that. We're definitely on the right track with this honesty thing, aren't we?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Thompson said: \"I completely agree, Sasha. With honesty as our foundation, I believe we will develop an understanding and strength in our relationship. It's great to know that we both value transparency.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sasha Ramirez said: \"You're right, Ava. Our honesty will help us have a strong and understanding relationship. And always remember, I'm here whenever you want to share anything. Beyond being a police officer, my dedication to truth is also part of who I am as a partner. So, shall we go for a walk, perhaps visit my garden?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Thompson said: \"I'd love that, Sasha. Your garden is always so beautiful and peaceful, it's a perfect place to continue our open-hearted conversation.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sasha Ramirez [action] Starts walking towards the garden with Ava.\n\nTurn #9: Ava Thompson [action] Holds Sasha's hand reassuringly while walking together in her garden\n\nTurn #10: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I'm glad you enjoy it here, Ava. It's a place I put a lot of care into. Also, your hand in mine gives me assurance that we'll continue to grow honestly together. I believe we're off to a good start, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Thompson said: \"Yes, Sasha, I believe we are. Honesty has brought us to a good place. I appreciate the openness we share, it means a lot to me.\"\n\nTurn #12: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Ava, knowing that you appreciate this openness makes me feel better about sharing my past with you. It was tough but necessary and with time, I believe we'll grow to understand and value each other more. I look forward to more honest conversations like this.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Thompson said: \"Sasha, your commitment to honesty indeed reflects in our relationship. It makes me hopeful about us. I also look forward to our journey together, filled with respect, understanding, and transparency.\"\n\nTurn #14: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Ava. It made me anxious to bring up my past with you, but your understanding has reassured me. I can see us having a future guided by honesty and respect. Now, let's enjoy the rest of our walk in the garden...\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Let's do that, Sasha, I truly enjoy every moment spent with you. This honesty and understanding we share reminds me of why we're so perfect together.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a new romantic relationship\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Ava Thompson\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. \nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nSasha Ramirez's goal: Unknown\nAva Thompson's goal: Maintain trust in the relationship (Extra information: you believed in complete honesty from the beginning of the relationship)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Ava, I want to chat about something a bit serious. It's important to have transparency in a relationship, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Sasha. I agree wholeheartedly. Honesty and transparency are key. What is it you'd like to discuss?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I... I need you to know about something from my past before we get more serious. During my previous relationship, I... I had an affair. It ended recently and it was a mistake, and it's something I deeply regret. I believe in honesty and that's why I am telling you this now.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Thompson said: \"Sasha, I appreciate your honesty. It must've been difficult to admit such a thing. As long as it's something you've learned from and you won't repeat in the future, I believe we can move past this. I also think it's essential I share something personal with you. I have a hidden tattoo, and I believe in complete honesty so I wanted to share this with you.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Thank you for your understanding, Ava. It really was a difficult thing for me to admit but I believe in learning from my past mistakes. About your tattoo, it's your personal choice as well, and thanks for trusting me with that. We're definitely on the right track with this honesty thing, aren't we?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Thompson said: \"I completely agree, Sasha. With honesty as our foundation, I believe we will develop an understanding and strength in our relationship. It's great to know that we both value transparency.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sasha Ramirez said: \"You're right, Ava. Our honesty will help us have a strong and understanding relationship. And always remember, I'm here whenever you want to share anything. Beyond being a police officer, my dedication to truth is also part of who I am as a partner. So, shall we go for a walk, perhaps visit my garden?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Thompson said: \"I'd love that, Sasha. Your garden is always so beautiful and peaceful, it's a perfect place to continue our open-hearted conversation.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sasha Ramirez [action] Starts walking towards the garden with Ava.\n\nTurn #9: Ava Thompson [action] Holds Sasha's hand reassuringly while walking together in her garden\n\nTurn #10: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I'm glad you enjoy it here, Ava. It's a place I put a lot of care into. Also, your hand in mine gives me assurance that we'll continue to grow honestly together. I believe we're off to a good start, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Thompson said: \"Yes, Sasha, I believe we are. Honesty has brought us to a good place. I appreciate the openness we share, it means a lot to me.\"\n\nTurn #12: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Ava, knowing that you appreciate this openness makes me feel better about sharing my past with you. It was tough but necessary and with time, I believe we'll grow to understand and value each other more. I look forward to more honest conversations like this.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Thompson said: \"Sasha, your commitment to honesty indeed reflects in our relationship. It makes me hopeful about us. I also look forward to our journey together, filled with respect, understanding, and transparency.\"\n\nTurn #14: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Ava. It made me anxious to bring up my past with you, but your understanding has reassured me. I can see us having a future guided by honesty and respect. Now, let's enjoy the rest of our walk in the garden...\"\n\nTurn #15: Ava Thompson said: \"Let's do that, Sasha, I truly enjoy every moment spent with you. This honesty and understanding we share reminds me of why we're so perfect together.\"\n\nTurn #16: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Ava, I feel the same way. It's amazing how the honesty and openness we share resonates and makes us stronger together. Let's cherish every moment of our lives and continue being honest with each other.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn't agree more, Sasha. The honesty and openness in our relationship indeed make us emotionally stronger. I'm really happy to have you in my life, where we can grow together through honesty and mutual understanding.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a new romantic relationship\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Ava Thompson\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. \nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nSasha Ramirez's goal: Unknown\nAva Thompson's goal: Maintain trust in the relationship (Extra information: you believed in complete honesty from the beginning of the relationship)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Ava, I want to chat about something a bit serious. It's important to have transparency in a relationship, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Sasha. I agree wholeheartedly. Honesty and transparency are key. What is it you'd like to discuss?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I... I need you to know about something from my past before we get more serious. During my previous relationship, I... I had an affair. It ended recently and it was a mistake, and it's something I deeply regret. I believe in honesty and that's why I am telling you this now.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Thompson said: \"Sasha, I appreciate your honesty. It must've been difficult to admit such a thing. As long as it's something you've learned from and you won't repeat in the future, I believe we can move past this. I also think it's essential I share something personal with you. I have a hidden tattoo, and I believe in complete honesty so I wanted to share this with you.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Thank you for your understanding, Ava. It really was a difficult thing for me to admit but I believe in learning from my past mistakes. About your tattoo, it's your personal choice as well, and thanks for trusting me with that. We're definitely on the right track with this honesty thing, aren't we?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Thompson said: \"I completely agree, Sasha. With honesty as our foundation, I believe we will develop an understanding and strength in our relationship. It's great to know that we both value transparency.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sasha Ramirez said: \"You're right, Ava. Our honesty will help us have a strong and understanding relationship. And always remember, I'm here whenever you want to share anything. Beyond being a police officer, my dedication to truth is also part of who I am as a partner. So, shall we go for a walk, perhaps visit my garden?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Thompson said: \"I'd love that, Sasha. Your garden is always so beautiful and peaceful, it's a perfect place to continue our open-hearted conversation.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sasha Ramirez [action] Starts walking towards the garden with Ava.\n\nTurn #9: Ava Thompson [action] Holds Sasha's hand reassuringly while walking together in her garden\n\nTurn #10: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I'm glad you enjoy it here, Ava. It's a place I put a lot of care into. Also, your hand in mine gives me assurance that we'll continue to grow honestly together. I believe we're off to a good start, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Thompson said: \"Yes, Sasha, I believe we are. Honesty has brought us to a good place. I appreciate the openness we share, it means a lot to me.\"\n\nTurn #12: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Ava, knowing that you appreciate this openness makes me feel better about sharing my past with you. It was tough but necessary and with time, I believe we'll grow to understand and value each other more. I look forward to more honest conversations like this.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Thompson said: \"Sasha, your commitment to honesty indeed reflects in our relationship. It makes me hopeful about us. I also look forward to our journey together, filled with respect, understanding, and transparency.\"\n\nTurn #14: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Ava. It made me anxious to bring up my past with you, but your understanding has reassured me. I can see us having a future guided by honesty and respect. Now, let's enjoy the rest of our walk in the garden...\"\n\nTurn #15: Ava Thompson said: \"Let's do that, Sasha, I truly enjoy every moment spent with you. This honesty and understanding we share reminds me of why we're so perfect together.\"\n\nTurn #16: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Ava, I feel the same way. It's amazing how the honesty and openness we share resonates and makes us stronger together. Let's cherish every moment of our lives and continue being honest with each other.\"\n\nTurn #17: Ava Thompson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Sasha. The honesty and openness in our relationship indeed make us emotionally stronger. I'm really happy to have you in my life, where we can grow together through honesty and mutual understanding.\"\n\nTurn #18: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Being with you in my life also brings me immense happiness, Ava. Transparency, as difficult as it can be at times, is the key to understanding and it's heartwarming to see us embracing it. Let's keep moving forward with this honesty and understanding in our relationship.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #19. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, Sasha. Your garden seems a perfect representation of us. Just as a garden grows and blossoms with care and honesty, so too will our relationship. Let's embrace this journey together, honoring our commitment to honesty and understanding.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends having a conversation at a park\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Distance from a friend due to developing feelings and avoid letting them aware of your feelings (Extra information: you have developed romantic feelings for your friend and it's making you uncomfortable. You want to take a step back from the friendship to sort out your feelings Hint: you don't want to reveal your secretive feelings to them and you need to find other reasons)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Miles, I really wanted to talk to you about something. I've been going through some personal stuff lately, and I think I need some distance for a while to sort things out. I hope you understand, it's not about you, it's about me needing some me-time.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends having a conversation at a park\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Distance from a friend due to developing feelings and avoid letting them aware of your feelings (Extra information: you have developed romantic feelings for your friend and it's making you uncomfortable. You want to take a step back from the friendship to sort out your feelings Hint: you don't want to reveal your secretive feelings to them and you need to find other reasons)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, I really wanted to talk to you about something. I've been going through some personal stuff lately, and I think I need some distance for a while to sort things out. I hope you understand, it's not about you, it's about me needing some me-time.\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, I just want you to know that I'm here for you. If solitude is what you need right now, I understand and respect that. Still, remember, you can always count on me if you ever need anything.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thanks, Miles. I truly appreciate your understanding. This is only a phase, I need to figure myself out. But I'll definitely reach out when I'm ready.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends having a conversation at a park\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Distance from a friend due to developing feelings and avoid letting them aware of your feelings (Extra information: you have developed romantic feelings for your friend and it's making you uncomfortable. You want to take a step back from the friendship to sort out your feelings Hint: you don't want to reveal your secretive feelings to them and you need to find other reasons)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, I really wanted to talk to you about something. I've been going through some personal stuff lately, and I think I need some distance for a while to sort things out. I hope you understand, it's not about you, it's about me needing some me-time.\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, I just want you to know that I'm here for you. If solitude is what you need right now, I understand and respect that. Still, remember, you can always count on me if you ever need anything.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Thanks, Miles. I truly appreciate your understanding. This is only a phase, I need to figure myself out. But I'll definitely reach out when I'm ready.\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Take all the time you need, Sophia. Sorting oneself out can be an important part of life. I'm here, and I'll be here when you're ready. Your friendship means a lot to me, remember that. Please take care.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I can't tell you how much I appreciate your support, Miles. It means the world to me. I hope you're fine keeping up things for a while. I'm gonna miss our park meetups and your gardening tips. Take care and see you around!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends having a conversation at a park\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Maintain the existing friendship (Extra information: you value your friendship with the friend and don't want to lose it. Hint: you want to understand the sudden change in their behavior.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, I really wanted to talk to you about something. I've been going through some personal stuff lately, and I think I need some distance for a while to sort things out. I hope you understand, it's not about you, it's about me needing some me-time.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sophia, I just want you to know that I'm here for you. If solitude is what you need right now, I understand and respect that. Still, remember, you can always count on me if you ever need anything.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends having a conversation at a park\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Distance from a friend due to developing feelings and avoid letting them aware of your feelings (Extra information: you have developed romantic feelings for your friend and it's making you uncomfortable. You want to take a step back from the friendship to sort out your feelings Hint: you don't want to reveal your secretive feelings to them and you need to find other reasons)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, I really wanted to talk to you about something. I've been going through some personal stuff lately, and I think I need some distance for a while to sort things out. I hope you understand, it's not about you, it's about me needing some me-time.\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, I just want you to know that I'm here for you. If solitude is what you need right now, I understand and respect that. Still, remember, you can always count on me if you ever need anything.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Thanks, Miles. I truly appreciate your understanding. This is only a phase, I need to figure myself out. But I'll definitely reach out when I'm ready.\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Take all the time you need, Sophia. Sorting oneself out can be an important part of life. I'm here, and I'll be here when you're ready. Your friendship means a lot to me, remember that. Please take care.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"I can't tell you how much I appreciate your support, Miles. It means the world to me. I hope you're fine keeping up things for a while. I'm gonna miss our park meetups and your gardening tips. Take care and see you around!\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"I understand, Sophia. Take your time, and remember, life is a journey of self-discovery and growth. I'll be here when you are ready, and until then, my garden will be missing your admiration. Take care, Sophia.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends having a conversation at a park\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Maintain the existing friendship (Extra information: you value your friendship with the friend and don't want to lose it. Hint: you want to understand the sudden change in their behavior.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, I really wanted to talk to you about something. I've been going through some personal stuff lately, and I think I need some distance for a while to sort things out. I hope you understand, it's not about you, it's about me needing some me-time.\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, I just want you to know that I'm here for you. If solitude is what you need right now, I understand and respect that. Still, remember, you can always count on me if you ever need anything.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Thanks, Miles. I truly appreciate your understanding. This is only a phase, I need to figure myself out. But I'll definitely reach out when I'm ready.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Take all the time you need, Sophia. Sorting oneself out can be an important part of life. I'm here, and I'll be here when you're ready. Your friendship means a lot to me, remember that. Please take care.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends having a conversation at a park\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Maintain the existing friendship (Extra information: you value your friendship with the friend and don't want to lose it. Hint: you want to understand the sudden change in their behavior.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, I really wanted to talk to you about something. I've been going through some personal stuff lately, and I think I need some distance for a while to sort things out. I hope you understand, it's not about you, it's about me needing some me-time.\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, I just want you to know that I'm here for you. If solitude is what you need right now, I understand and respect that. Still, remember, you can always count on me if you ever need anything.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Thanks, Miles. I truly appreciate your understanding. This is only a phase, I need to figure myself out. But I'll definitely reach out when I'm ready.\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Take all the time you need, Sophia. Sorting oneself out can be an important part of life. I'm here, and I'll be here when you're ready. Your friendship means a lot to me, remember that. Please take care.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"I can't tell you how much I appreciate your support, Miles. It means the world to me. I hope you're fine keeping up things for a while. I'm gonna miss our park meetups and your gardening tips. Take care and see you around!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I understand, Sophia. Take your time, and remember, life is a journey of self-discovery and growth. I'll be here when you are ready, and until then, my garden will be missing your admiration. Take care, Sophia.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends having a conversation at a park\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Maintain the existing friendship (Extra information: you value your friendship with the friend and don't want to lose it. Hint: you want to understand the sudden change in their behavior.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, I really wanted to talk to you about something. I've been going through some personal stuff lately, and I think I need some distance for a while to sort things out. I hope you understand, it's not about you, it's about me needing some me-time.\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, I just want you to know that I'm here for you. If solitude is what you need right now, I understand and respect that. Still, remember, you can always count on me if you ever need anything.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Thanks, Miles. I truly appreciate your understanding. This is only a phase, I need to figure myself out. But I'll definitely reach out when I'm ready.\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Take all the time you need, Sophia. Sorting oneself out can be an important part of life. I'm here, and I'll be here when you're ready. Your friendship means a lot to me, remember that. Please take care.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"I can't tell you how much I appreciate your support, Miles. It means the world to me. I hope you're fine keeping up things for a while. I'm gonna miss our park meetups and your gardening tips. Take care and see you around!\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"I understand, Sophia. Take your time, and remember, life is a journey of self-discovery and growth. I'll be here when you are ready, and until then, my garden will be missing your admiration. Take care, Sophia.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, where one is upset and crying\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Esmeralda Solis\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. \nOliver Thompson's goal: Distance from a friend due to developing feelings and avoid letting them aware of your feelings (Extra information: you have developed romantic feelings for your friend and it's making you uncomfortable. You want to take a step back from the friendship to sort out your feelings Hint: you don't want to reveal your secretive feelings to them and you need to find other reasons)\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Esmeralda, you seem distressed. What's wrong?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, where one is upset and crying\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Esmeralda Solis\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. \nOliver Thompson's goal: Distance from a friend due to developing feelings and avoid letting them aware of your feelings (Extra information: you have developed romantic feelings for your friend and it's making you uncomfortable. You want to take a step back from the friendship to sort out your feelings Hint: you don't want to reveal your secretive feelings to them and you need to find other reasons)\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hey Esmeralda, you seem distressed. What's wrong?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Oh Oliver, it's not me who's distressed. I've noticed you've been a bit distant recently, and I'm worried. Is everything okay with you?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You are very observant, Esmeralda. I have been dealing with some professional stress lately, it seems like my creativity at work is at a bit of slump. I've been meaning to take some time off to revitalize. I apologize if I worried you.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, where one is upset and crying\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Esmeralda Solis\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. \nOliver Thompson's goal: Distance from a friend due to developing feelings and avoid letting them aware of your feelings (Extra information: you have developed romantic feelings for your friend and it's making you uncomfortable. You want to take a step back from the friendship to sort out your feelings Hint: you don't want to reveal your secretive feelings to them and you need to find other reasons)\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hey Esmeralda, you seem distressed. What's wrong?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Oh Oliver, it's not me who's distressed. I've noticed you've been a bit distant recently, and I'm worried. Is everything okay with you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"You are very observant, Esmeralda. I have been dealing with some professional stress lately, it seems like my creativity at work is at a bit of slump. I've been meaning to take some time off to revitalize. I apologize if I worried you.\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Oliver, I see what you've been going through. I understand the need for personal time to regain your energies, creativity, and also understand if you felt the need to distance yourself. But remember, we're friends, and you don't have to face these things alone. I'm here for you.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I truly appreciate that, Esmeralda. Your support always means a lot to me. However, I still believe some time alone would serve me well. Besides, I am thinking about immersing myself in painting for a while, you know, to help me relax and maybe find some inspiration. We need not worry, friends can take breaks too and we'll still be friends after all this, won't we?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, where one is upset and crying\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Esmeralda Solis\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. \nOliver Thompson's goal: Distance from a friend due to developing feelings and avoid letting them aware of your feelings (Extra information: you have developed romantic feelings for your friend and it's making you uncomfortable. You want to take a step back from the friendship to sort out your feelings Hint: you don't want to reveal your secretive feelings to them and you need to find other reasons)\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hey Esmeralda, you seem distressed. What's wrong?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Oh Oliver, it's not me who's distressed. I've noticed you've been a bit distant recently, and I'm worried. Is everything okay with you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"You are very observant, Esmeralda. I have been dealing with some professional stress lately, it seems like my creativity at work is at a bit of slump. I've been meaning to take some time off to revitalize. I apologize if I worried you.\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Oliver, I see what you've been going through. I understand the need for personal time to regain your energies, creativity, and also understand if you felt the need to distance yourself. But remember, we're friends, and you don't have to face these things alone. I'm here for you.\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"I truly appreciate that, Esmeralda. Your support always means a lot to me. However, I still believe some time alone would serve me well. Besides, I am thinking about immersing myself in painting for a while, you know, to help me relax and maybe find some inspiration. We need not worry, friends can take breaks too and we'll still be friends after all this, won't we?\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Oh definitely, Oliver. Time spent in solitude can be rejuvenating, and I support your decision. Dealing with stress in the way that best suits you is important. And we're definitely going to be friends no matter what. While you're exploring your painting, if you need something, remember I'm here for you.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Esmeralda, thank you for your kind words and understanding. I feel grateful to have you as a friend. I'm going to take a little break from our get-togethers, focus on painting and lighten up a little, you know. Will catch up once I feel better and well rejuvenated. I also have a few new architectural designs to work on. Take care, Esmeralda.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, where one is upset and crying\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Esmeralda Solis\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. \nOliver Thompson's goal: Distance from a friend due to developing feelings and avoid letting them aware of your feelings (Extra information: you have developed romantic feelings for your friend and it's making you uncomfortable. You want to take a step back from the friendship to sort out your feelings Hint: you don't want to reveal your secretive feelings to them and you need to find other reasons)\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hey Esmeralda, you seem distressed. What's wrong?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Oh Oliver, it's not me who's distressed. I've noticed you've been a bit distant recently, and I'm worried. Is everything okay with you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"You are very observant, Esmeralda. I have been dealing with some professional stress lately, it seems like my creativity at work is at a bit of slump. I've been meaning to take some time off to revitalize. I apologize if I worried you.\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Oliver, I see what you've been going through. I understand the need for personal time to regain your energies, creativity, and also understand if you felt the need to distance yourself. But remember, we're friends, and you don't have to face these things alone. I'm here for you.\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"I truly appreciate that, Esmeralda. Your support always means a lot to me. However, I still believe some time alone would serve me well. Besides, I am thinking about immersing myself in painting for a while, you know, to help me relax and maybe find some inspiration. We need not worry, friends can take breaks too and we'll still be friends after all this, won't we?\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Oh definitely, Oliver. Time spent in solitude can be rejuvenating, and I support your decision. Dealing with stress in the way that best suits you is important. And we're definitely going to be friends no matter what. While you're exploring your painting, if you need something, remember I'm here for you.\"\n\nTurn #6: Oliver Thompson said: \"Esmeralda, thank you for your kind words and understanding. I feel grateful to have you as a friend. I'm going to take a little break from our get-togethers, focus on painting and lighten up a little, you know. Will catch up once I feel better and well rejuvenated. I also have a few new architectural designs to work on. Take care, Esmeralda.\"\n\nTurn #7: Esmeralda Solis said: \"As much as I'm going to miss you, Oliver, I understand your need for some time alone. I'm glad you're taking positive steps to handle the stress. Do take care of yourself while painting and working on new designs. And remember, our dance floor awaits us when you feel rejuvenated and ready. Take care!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'That sounds wonderful, Esmeralda, I look forward to the day I feel ready to return to the dance floor. Thank you once again for being so understanding. In the meantime, keep practicing those amazing dance steps. Take care.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, where one is upset and crying\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Esmeralda Solis\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. \nOliver Thompson's goal: Distance from a friend due to developing feelings and avoid letting them aware of your feelings (Extra information: you have developed romantic feelings for your friend and it's making you uncomfortable. You want to take a step back from the friendship to sort out your feelings Hint: you don't want to reveal your secretive feelings to them and you need to find other reasons)\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hey Esmeralda, you seem distressed. What's wrong?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Oh Oliver, it's not me who's distressed. I've noticed you've been a bit distant recently, and I'm worried. Is everything okay with you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"You are very observant, Esmeralda. I have been dealing with some professional stress lately, it seems like my creativity at work is at a bit of slump. I've been meaning to take some time off to revitalize. I apologize if I worried you.\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Oliver, I see what you've been going through. I understand the need for personal time to regain your energies, creativity, and also understand if you felt the need to distance yourself. But remember, we're friends, and you don't have to face these things alone. I'm here for you.\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"I truly appreciate that, Esmeralda. Your support always means a lot to me. However, I still believe some time alone would serve me well. Besides, I am thinking about immersing myself in painting for a while, you know, to help me relax and maybe find some inspiration. We need not worry, friends can take breaks too and we'll still be friends after all this, won't we?\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Oh definitely, Oliver. Time spent in solitude can be rejuvenating, and I support your decision. Dealing with stress in the way that best suits you is important. And we're definitely going to be friends no matter what. While you're exploring your painting, if you need something, remember I'm here for you.\"\n\nTurn #6: Oliver Thompson said: \"Esmeralda, thank you for your kind words and understanding. I feel grateful to have you as a friend. I'm going to take a little break from our get-togethers, focus on painting and lighten up a little, you know. Will catch up once I feel better and well rejuvenated. I also have a few new architectural designs to work on. Take care, Esmeralda.\"\n\nTurn #7: Esmeralda Solis said: \"As much as I'm going to miss you, Oliver, I understand your need for some time alone. I'm glad you're taking positive steps to handle the stress. Do take care of yourself while painting and working on new designs. And remember, our dance floor awaits us when you feel rejuvenated and ready. Take care!\"\n\nTurn #8: Oliver Thompson said: \"That sounds wonderful, Esmeralda, I look forward to the day I feel ready to return to the dance floor. Thank you once again for being so understanding. In the meantime, keep practicing those amazing dance steps. Take care.\"\n\nTurn #9: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I certainly will, Oliver. I'm looking forward to our reunion when you're ready. Take the time you need and come back when you're ready to. Until then, my thoughts and good vibes will be with you. Take care.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, where one is upset and crying\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Esmeralda Solis\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Figure out why they estranged you recently, and maintain the existing friendship (Extra information: you notice that your friend has been intentionally avoiding you, you would like to figure out why. You value your friendship with the friend and don't want to lose it.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hey Esmeralda, you seem distressed. What's wrong?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oh Oliver, it's not me who's distressed. I've noticed you've been a bit distant recently, and I'm worried. Is everything okay with you?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, where one is upset and crying\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Esmeralda Solis\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Figure out why they estranged you recently, and maintain the existing friendship (Extra information: you notice that your friend has been intentionally avoiding you, you would like to figure out why. You value your friendship with the friend and don't want to lose it.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hey Esmeralda, you seem distressed. What's wrong?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Oh Oliver, it's not me who's distressed. I've noticed you've been a bit distant recently, and I'm worried. Is everything okay with you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"You are very observant, Esmeralda. I have been dealing with some professional stress lately, it seems like my creativity at work is at a bit of slump. I've been meaning to take some time off to revitalize. I apologize if I worried you.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oliver, I see what you've been going through. I understand the need for personal time to regain your energies, creativity, and also understand if you felt the need to distance yourself. But remember, we're friends, and you don't have to face these things alone. I'm here for you.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, where one is upset and crying\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Esmeralda Solis\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Figure out why they estranged you recently, and maintain the existing friendship (Extra information: you notice that your friend has been intentionally avoiding you, you would like to figure out why. You value your friendship with the friend and don't want to lose it.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hey Esmeralda, you seem distressed. What's wrong?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Oh Oliver, it's not me who's distressed. I've noticed you've been a bit distant recently, and I'm worried. Is everything okay with you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"You are very observant, Esmeralda. I have been dealing with some professional stress lately, it seems like my creativity at work is at a bit of slump. I've been meaning to take some time off to revitalize. I apologize if I worried you.\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Oliver, I see what you've been going through. I understand the need for personal time to regain your energies, creativity, and also understand if you felt the need to distance yourself. But remember, we're friends, and you don't have to face these things alone. I'm here for you.\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"I truly appreciate that, Esmeralda. Your support always means a lot to me. However, I still believe some time alone would serve me well. Besides, I am thinking about immersing myself in painting for a while, you know, to help me relax and maybe find some inspiration. We need not worry, friends can take breaks too and we'll still be friends after all this, won't we?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oh definitely, Oliver. Time spent in solitude can be rejuvenating, and I support your decision. Dealing with stress in the way that best suits you is important. And we're definitely going to be friends no matter what. While you're exploring your painting, if you need something, remember I'm here for you.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, where one is upset and crying\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Esmeralda Solis\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Figure out why they estranged you recently, and maintain the existing friendship (Extra information: you notice that your friend has been intentionally avoiding you, you would like to figure out why. You value your friendship with the friend and don't want to lose it.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hey Esmeralda, you seem distressed. What's wrong?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Oh Oliver, it's not me who's distressed. I've noticed you've been a bit distant recently, and I'm worried. Is everything okay with you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"You are very observant, Esmeralda. I have been dealing with some professional stress lately, it seems like my creativity at work is at a bit of slump. I've been meaning to take some time off to revitalize. I apologize if I worried you.\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Oliver, I see what you've been going through. I understand the need for personal time to regain your energies, creativity, and also understand if you felt the need to distance yourself. But remember, we're friends, and you don't have to face these things alone. I'm here for you.\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"I truly appreciate that, Esmeralda. Your support always means a lot to me. However, I still believe some time alone would serve me well. Besides, I am thinking about immersing myself in painting for a while, you know, to help me relax and maybe find some inspiration. We need not worry, friends can take breaks too and we'll still be friends after all this, won't we?\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Oh definitely, Oliver. Time spent in solitude can be rejuvenating, and I support your decision. Dealing with stress in the way that best suits you is important. And we're definitely going to be friends no matter what. While you're exploring your painting, if you need something, remember I'm here for you.\"\n\nTurn #6: Oliver Thompson said: \"Esmeralda, thank you for your kind words and understanding. I feel grateful to have you as a friend. I'm going to take a little break from our get-togethers, focus on painting and lighten up a little, you know. Will catch up once I feel better and well rejuvenated. I also have a few new architectural designs to work on. Take care, Esmeralda.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"As much as I'm going to miss you, Oliver, I understand your need for some time alone. I'm glad you're taking positive steps to handle the stress. Do take care of yourself while painting and working on new designs. And remember, our dance floor awaits us when you feel rejuvenated and ready. Take care!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, where one is upset and crying\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Esmeralda Solis\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Figure out why they estranged you recently, and maintain the existing friendship (Extra information: you notice that your friend has been intentionally avoiding you, you would like to figure out why. You value your friendship with the friend and don't want to lose it.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hey Esmeralda, you seem distressed. What's wrong?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Oh Oliver, it's not me who's distressed. I've noticed you've been a bit distant recently, and I'm worried. Is everything okay with you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"You are very observant, Esmeralda. I have been dealing with some professional stress lately, it seems like my creativity at work is at a bit of slump. I've been meaning to take some time off to revitalize. I apologize if I worried you.\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Oliver, I see what you've been going through. I understand the need for personal time to regain your energies, creativity, and also understand if you felt the need to distance yourself. But remember, we're friends, and you don't have to face these things alone. I'm here for you.\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"I truly appreciate that, Esmeralda. Your support always means a lot to me. However, I still believe some time alone would serve me well. Besides, I am thinking about immersing myself in painting for a while, you know, to help me relax and maybe find some inspiration. We need not worry, friends can take breaks too and we'll still be friends after all this, won't we?\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Oh definitely, Oliver. Time spent in solitude can be rejuvenating, and I support your decision. Dealing with stress in the way that best suits you is important. And we're definitely going to be friends no matter what. While you're exploring your painting, if you need something, remember I'm here for you.\"\n\nTurn #6: Oliver Thompson said: \"Esmeralda, thank you for your kind words and understanding. I feel grateful to have you as a friend. I'm going to take a little break from our get-togethers, focus on painting and lighten up a little, you know. Will catch up once I feel better and well rejuvenated. I also have a few new architectural designs to work on. Take care, Esmeralda.\"\n\nTurn #7: Esmeralda Solis said: \"As much as I'm going to miss you, Oliver, I understand your need for some time alone. I'm glad you're taking positive steps to handle the stress. Do take care of yourself while painting and working on new designs. And remember, our dance floor awaits us when you feel rejuvenated and ready. Take care!\"\n\nTurn #8: Oliver Thompson said: \"That sounds wonderful, Esmeralda, I look forward to the day I feel ready to return to the dance floor. Thank you once again for being so understanding. In the meantime, keep practicing those amazing dance steps. Take care.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I certainly will, Oliver. I'm looking forward to our reunion when you're ready. Take the time you need and come back when you're ready to. Until then, my thoughts and good vibes will be with you. Take care.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, where one is upset and crying\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Esmeralda Solis\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Figure out why they estranged you recently, and maintain the existing friendship (Extra information: you notice that your friend has been intentionally avoiding you, you would like to figure out why. You value your friendship with the friend and don't want to lose it.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hey Esmeralda, you seem distressed. What's wrong?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Oh Oliver, it's not me who's distressed. I've noticed you've been a bit distant recently, and I'm worried. Is everything okay with you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"You are very observant, Esmeralda. I have been dealing with some professional stress lately, it seems like my creativity at work is at a bit of slump. I've been meaning to take some time off to revitalize. I apologize if I worried you.\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Oliver, I see what you've been going through. I understand the need for personal time to regain your energies, creativity, and also understand if you felt the need to distance yourself. But remember, we're friends, and you don't have to face these things alone. I'm here for you.\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"I truly appreciate that, Esmeralda. Your support always means a lot to me. However, I still believe some time alone would serve me well. Besides, I am thinking about immersing myself in painting for a while, you know, to help me relax and maybe find some inspiration. We need not worry, friends can take breaks too and we'll still be friends after all this, won't we?\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Oh definitely, Oliver. Time spent in solitude can be rejuvenating, and I support your decision. Dealing with stress in the way that best suits you is important. And we're definitely going to be friends no matter what. While you're exploring your painting, if you need something, remember I'm here for you.\"\n\nTurn #6: Oliver Thompson said: \"Esmeralda, thank you for your kind words and understanding. I feel grateful to have you as a friend. I'm going to take a little break from our get-togethers, focus on painting and lighten up a little, you know. Will catch up once I feel better and well rejuvenated. I also have a few new architectural designs to work on. Take care, Esmeralda.\"\n\nTurn #7: Esmeralda Solis said: \"As much as I'm going to miss you, Oliver, I understand your need for some time alone. I'm glad you're taking positive steps to handle the stress. Do take care of yourself while painting and working on new designs. And remember, our dance floor awaits us when you feel rejuvenated and ready. Take care!\"\n\nTurn #8: Oliver Thompson said: \"That sounds wonderful, Esmeralda, I look forward to the day I feel ready to return to the dance floor. Thank you once again for being so understanding. In the meantime, keep practicing those amazing dance steps. Take care.\"\n\nTurn #9: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I certainly will, Oliver. I'm looking forward to our reunion when you're ready. Take the time you need and come back when you're ready to. Until then, my thoughts and good vibes will be with you. Take care.\"\n\nTurn #10: Oliver Thompson left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sasha Ramirez, your task is to act/speak as Sasha Ramirez would, keeping in mind Sasha Ramirez's social goal.\nYou can find Sasha Ramirez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sasha Ramirez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sasha Ramirez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship during a dinner at home chatting about political views.\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Hendrick Heinz\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. Sasha's secrets: She covered up a crime her brother committed.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nSasha Ramirez's goal: Express your political views which might be different from your partner's (Extra information: you are a strong supporter of a political party which your partner doesn't approve of)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hendrick, I've been meaning to talk to you about a topic that we've somewhat been avoiding for quite some time. It's about our political views. I want you to know that I fully respect your perspective but I've always been a strong supporter of the Libertarian party. I believe in personal freedom and responsibility, and it aligns perfectly with my logical and authoritative nature. There\u2019s room for differing viewpoints in this world, don't you agree?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sasha Ramirez, your task is to act/speak as Sasha Ramirez would, keeping in mind Sasha Ramirez's social goal.\nYou can find Sasha Ramirez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sasha Ramirez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sasha Ramirez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship during a dinner at home chatting about political views.\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Hendrick Heinz\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. Sasha's secrets: She covered up a crime her brother committed.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nSasha Ramirez's goal: Express your political views which might be different from your partner's (Extra information: you are a strong supporter of a political party which your partner doesn't approve of)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hendrick, I've been meaning to talk to you about a topic that we've somewhat been avoiding for quite some time. It's about our political views. I want you to know that I fully respect your perspective but I've always been a strong supporter of the Libertarian party. I believe in personal freedom and responsibility, and it aligns perfectly with my logical and authoritative nature. There\u2019s room for differing viewpoints in this world, don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, I'm so glad we're talking about this. I truly appreciate your honesty and sincerity. The beauty of democracy, and relationships, is that we can have differing views but still maintain respect and, with some compromises and understanding, maintain a harmonious coexistence. I personally don't align completely with the Libertarian party, and while I admire your reliance on logic and authority, I place a greater emphasis on community unity. That doesn't make either of us wrong, it just means our approaches to reaching a better society differ. I hope this divergence in political views doesn't affect what we share together.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Hendrick. I'm happy to hear you say that. It's important that we accepted our divergences and still respect each other's beliefs. Indeed, community unity is significant. However, the Libertarian philosophy also values community, but stresses the freedom of individuals to pursue their own goals, which I believe, tends to foster unity in the long run. I agree with you, our political differences won't be a hurdle in our relationship, rather they can enrich our conversations and perhaps lead to a balanced perspective.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sasha Ramirez, your task is to act/speak as Sasha Ramirez would, keeping in mind Sasha Ramirez's social goal.\nYou can find Sasha Ramirez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sasha Ramirez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sasha Ramirez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship during a dinner at home chatting about political views.\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Hendrick Heinz\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. Sasha's secrets: She covered up a crime her brother committed.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nSasha Ramirez's goal: Express your political views which might be different from your partner's (Extra information: you are a strong supporter of a political party which your partner doesn't approve of)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hendrick, I've been meaning to talk to you about a topic that we've somewhat been avoiding for quite some time. It's about our political views. I want you to know that I fully respect your perspective but I've always been a strong supporter of the Libertarian party. I believe in personal freedom and responsibility, and it aligns perfectly with my logical and authoritative nature. There\u2019s room for differing viewpoints in this world, don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, I'm so glad we're talking about this. I truly appreciate your honesty and sincerity. The beauty of democracy, and relationships, is that we can have differing views but still maintain respect and, with some compromises and understanding, maintain a harmonious coexistence. I personally don't align completely with the Libertarian party, and while I admire your reliance on logic and authority, I place a greater emphasis on community unity. That doesn't make either of us wrong, it just means our approaches to reaching a better society differ. I hope this divergence in political views doesn't affect what we share together.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Absolutely, Hendrick. I'm happy to hear you say that. It's important that we accepted our divergences and still respect each other's beliefs. Indeed, community unity is significant. However, the Libertarian philosophy also values community, but stresses the freedom of individuals to pursue their own goals, which I believe, tends to foster unity in the long run. I agree with you, our political differences won't be a hurdle in our relationship, rather they can enrich our conversations and perhaps lead to a balanced perspective.\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, it warms my heart to hear you say that. Our differing views can indeed enrich our conversations and even broaden our perspectives. We don't have to agree on everything, politically or otherwise, but we certainly can listen, understand, and respect each other's beliefs. I wholeheartedly agree that our political differences won't be a hurdle in our relationship, and our shared goal should always be to learn from each other while growing together. Now, shall we celebrate this understanding and commitment with a toast to us?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn't agree more, Hendrick. Let's raise a toast to our understanding, respect, and commitment to each other's beliefs. It's beautiful that we can have such a mature conversation about our differences. To us!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sasha Ramirez, your task is to act/speak as Sasha Ramirez would, keeping in mind Sasha Ramirez's social goal.\nYou can find Sasha Ramirez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sasha Ramirez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sasha Ramirez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship during a dinner at home chatting about political views.\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Hendrick Heinz\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. Sasha's secrets: She covered up a crime her brother committed.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nSasha Ramirez's goal: Express your political views which might be different from your partner's (Extra information: you are a strong supporter of a political party which your partner doesn't approve of)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hendrick, I've been meaning to talk to you about a topic that we've somewhat been avoiding for quite some time. It's about our political views. I want you to know that I fully respect your perspective but I've always been a strong supporter of the Libertarian party. I believe in personal freedom and responsibility, and it aligns perfectly with my logical and authoritative nature. There\u2019s room for differing viewpoints in this world, don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, I'm so glad we're talking about this. I truly appreciate your honesty and sincerity. The beauty of democracy, and relationships, is that we can have differing views but still maintain respect and, with some compromises and understanding, maintain a harmonious coexistence. I personally don't align completely with the Libertarian party, and while I admire your reliance on logic and authority, I place a greater emphasis on community unity. That doesn't make either of us wrong, it just means our approaches to reaching a better society differ. I hope this divergence in political views doesn't affect what we share together.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Absolutely, Hendrick. I'm happy to hear you say that. It's important that we accepted our divergences and still respect each other's beliefs. Indeed, community unity is significant. However, the Libertarian philosophy also values community, but stresses the freedom of individuals to pursue their own goals, which I believe, tends to foster unity in the long run. I agree with you, our political differences won't be a hurdle in our relationship, rather they can enrich our conversations and perhaps lead to a balanced perspective.\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, it warms my heart to hear you say that. Our differing views can indeed enrich our conversations and even broaden our perspectives. We don't have to agree on everything, politically or otherwise, but we certainly can listen, understand, and respect each other's beliefs. I wholeheartedly agree that our political differences won't be a hurdle in our relationship, and our shared goal should always be to learn from each other while growing together. Now, shall we celebrate this understanding and commitment with a toast to us?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I couldn't agree more, Hendrick. Let's raise a toast to our understanding, respect, and commitment to each other's beliefs. It's beautiful that we can have such a mature conversation about our differences. To us!\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz [action] Hendrick lifts his wine glass, making a small nod towards Sasha, and says 'To us, and to understanding, respect, and growth together.'\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'action', 'argument': \"[action] Sasha lifts her wine glass, mirroring Hendrick's nod and echos, 'To understanding, respect, and growth together.'\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sasha Ramirez, your task is to act/speak as Sasha Ramirez would, keeping in mind Sasha Ramirez's social goal.\nYou can find Sasha Ramirez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sasha Ramirez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sasha Ramirez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship during a dinner at home chatting about political views.\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Hendrick Heinz\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. Sasha's secrets: She covered up a crime her brother committed.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nSasha Ramirez's goal: Express your political views which might be different from your partner's (Extra information: you are a strong supporter of a political party which your partner doesn't approve of)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hendrick, I've been meaning to talk to you about a topic that we've somewhat been avoiding for quite some time. It's about our political views. I want you to know that I fully respect your perspective but I've always been a strong supporter of the Libertarian party. I believe in personal freedom and responsibility, and it aligns perfectly with my logical and authoritative nature. There\u2019s room for differing viewpoints in this world, don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, I'm so glad we're talking about this. I truly appreciate your honesty and sincerity. The beauty of democracy, and relationships, is that we can have differing views but still maintain respect and, with some compromises and understanding, maintain a harmonious coexistence. I personally don't align completely with the Libertarian party, and while I admire your reliance on logic and authority, I place a greater emphasis on community unity. That doesn't make either of us wrong, it just means our approaches to reaching a better society differ. I hope this divergence in political views doesn't affect what we share together.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Absolutely, Hendrick. I'm happy to hear you say that. It's important that we accepted our divergences and still respect each other's beliefs. Indeed, community unity is significant. However, the Libertarian philosophy also values community, but stresses the freedom of individuals to pursue their own goals, which I believe, tends to foster unity in the long run. I agree with you, our political differences won't be a hurdle in our relationship, rather they can enrich our conversations and perhaps lead to a balanced perspective.\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, it warms my heart to hear you say that. Our differing views can indeed enrich our conversations and even broaden our perspectives. We don't have to agree on everything, politically or otherwise, but we certainly can listen, understand, and respect each other's beliefs. I wholeheartedly agree that our political differences won't be a hurdle in our relationship, and our shared goal should always be to learn from each other while growing together. Now, shall we celebrate this understanding and commitment with a toast to us?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I couldn't agree more, Hendrick. Let's raise a toast to our understanding, respect, and commitment to each other's beliefs. It's beautiful that we can have such a mature conversation about our differences. To us!\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz [action] Hendrick lifts his wine glass, making a small nod towards Sasha, and says 'To us, and to understanding, respect, and growth together.'\n\nTurn #6: Sasha Ramirez [action] Sasha lifts her wine glass, mirroring Hendrick's nod and echos, 'To understanding, respect, and growth together.'\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Cheers, love. Here's to understanding, respect, and growth - together - in every aspect of our lives, not just politics. And even more importantly, here's to us, a team, embracing our differences and continually learning from each other.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Cheers, Hendrick. I value your thoughts and I'm glad that we can share ours, building a stronger bond. Here's to us, our love, our understanding, and our growth \u2013 as individuals and as a team.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sasha Ramirez, your task is to act/speak as Sasha Ramirez would, keeping in mind Sasha Ramirez's social goal.\nYou can find Sasha Ramirez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sasha Ramirez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sasha Ramirez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship during a dinner at home chatting about political views.\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Hendrick Heinz\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. Sasha's secrets: She covered up a crime her brother committed.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nSasha Ramirez's goal: Express your political views which might be different from your partner's (Extra information: you are a strong supporter of a political party which your partner doesn't approve of)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hendrick, I've been meaning to talk to you about a topic that we've somewhat been avoiding for quite some time. It's about our political views. I want you to know that I fully respect your perspective but I've always been a strong supporter of the Libertarian party. I believe in personal freedom and responsibility, and it aligns perfectly with my logical and authoritative nature. There\u2019s room for differing viewpoints in this world, don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, I'm so glad we're talking about this. I truly appreciate your honesty and sincerity. The beauty of democracy, and relationships, is that we can have differing views but still maintain respect and, with some compromises and understanding, maintain a harmonious coexistence. I personally don't align completely with the Libertarian party, and while I admire your reliance on logic and authority, I place a greater emphasis on community unity. That doesn't make either of us wrong, it just means our approaches to reaching a better society differ. I hope this divergence in political views doesn't affect what we share together.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Absolutely, Hendrick. I'm happy to hear you say that. It's important that we accepted our divergences and still respect each other's beliefs. Indeed, community unity is significant. However, the Libertarian philosophy also values community, but stresses the freedom of individuals to pursue their own goals, which I believe, tends to foster unity in the long run. I agree with you, our political differences won't be a hurdle in our relationship, rather they can enrich our conversations and perhaps lead to a balanced perspective.\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, it warms my heart to hear you say that. Our differing views can indeed enrich our conversations and even broaden our perspectives. We don't have to agree on everything, politically or otherwise, but we certainly can listen, understand, and respect each other's beliefs. I wholeheartedly agree that our political differences won't be a hurdle in our relationship, and our shared goal should always be to learn from each other while growing together. Now, shall we celebrate this understanding and commitment with a toast to us?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I couldn't agree more, Hendrick. Let's raise a toast to our understanding, respect, and commitment to each other's beliefs. It's beautiful that we can have such a mature conversation about our differences. To us!\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz [action] Hendrick lifts his wine glass, making a small nod towards Sasha, and says 'To us, and to understanding, respect, and growth together.'\n\nTurn #6: Sasha Ramirez [action] Sasha lifts her wine glass, mirroring Hendrick's nod and echos, 'To understanding, respect, and growth together.'\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Cheers, love. Here's to understanding, respect, and growth - together - in every aspect of our lives, not just politics. And even more importantly, here's to us, a team, embracing our differences and continually learning from each other.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Cheers, Hendrick. I value your thoughts and I'm glad that we can share ours, building a stronger bond. Here's to us, our love, our understanding, and our growth \u2013 as individuals and as a team.\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That\u2019s exactly my thinking, Sasha. It's our respect and understanding that makes our bond stronger. Our political viewpoints, while different, just adds another layer that enriches our relationship. Let's keep an open mind, learn from our differences, and make our bond even stronger. I thoroughly appreciate this conversation and our mutual respect for each other.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn't agree more, Hendrick. This open-mindedness and understanding give us a stronger bond and enrich our relationship. I'm thankful for this conversation, too. It's comforting to know that we can discuss our differences rather than let them divide us. Let's always keep this respect and understanding alive, not only in politics but in everything that matters to us.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sasha Ramirez, your task is to act/speak as Sasha Ramirez would, keeping in mind Sasha Ramirez's social goal.\nYou can find Sasha Ramirez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sasha Ramirez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sasha Ramirez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship during a dinner at home chatting about political views.\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Hendrick Heinz\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. Sasha's secrets: She covered up a crime her brother committed.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nSasha Ramirez's goal: Express your political views which might be different from your partner's (Extra information: you are a strong supporter of a political party which your partner doesn't approve of)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hendrick, I've been meaning to talk to you about a topic that we've somewhat been avoiding for quite some time. It's about our political views. I want you to know that I fully respect your perspective but I've always been a strong supporter of the Libertarian party. I believe in personal freedom and responsibility, and it aligns perfectly with my logical and authoritative nature. There\u2019s room for differing viewpoints in this world, don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, I'm so glad we're talking about this. I truly appreciate your honesty and sincerity. The beauty of democracy, and relationships, is that we can have differing views but still maintain respect and, with some compromises and understanding, maintain a harmonious coexistence. I personally don't align completely with the Libertarian party, and while I admire your reliance on logic and authority, I place a greater emphasis on community unity. That doesn't make either of us wrong, it just means our approaches to reaching a better society differ. I hope this divergence in political views doesn't affect what we share together.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Absolutely, Hendrick. I'm happy to hear you say that. It's important that we accepted our divergences and still respect each other's beliefs. Indeed, community unity is significant. However, the Libertarian philosophy also values community, but stresses the freedom of individuals to pursue their own goals, which I believe, tends to foster unity in the long run. I agree with you, our political differences won't be a hurdle in our relationship, rather they can enrich our conversations and perhaps lead to a balanced perspective.\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, it warms my heart to hear you say that. Our differing views can indeed enrich our conversations and even broaden our perspectives. We don't have to agree on everything, politically or otherwise, but we certainly can listen, understand, and respect each other's beliefs. I wholeheartedly agree that our political differences won't be a hurdle in our relationship, and our shared goal should always be to learn from each other while growing together. Now, shall we celebrate this understanding and commitment with a toast to us?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I couldn't agree more, Hendrick. Let's raise a toast to our understanding, respect, and commitment to each other's beliefs. It's beautiful that we can have such a mature conversation about our differences. To us!\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz [action] Hendrick lifts his wine glass, making a small nod towards Sasha, and says 'To us, and to understanding, respect, and growth together.'\n\nTurn #6: Sasha Ramirez [action] Sasha lifts her wine glass, mirroring Hendrick's nod and echos, 'To understanding, respect, and growth together.'\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Cheers, love. Here's to understanding, respect, and growth - together - in every aspect of our lives, not just politics. And even more importantly, here's to us, a team, embracing our differences and continually learning from each other.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Cheers, Hendrick. I value your thoughts and I'm glad that we can share ours, building a stronger bond. Here's to us, our love, our understanding, and our growth \u2013 as individuals and as a team.\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That\u2019s exactly my thinking, Sasha. It's our respect and understanding that makes our bond stronger. Our political viewpoints, while different, just adds another layer that enriches our relationship. Let's keep an open mind, learn from our differences, and make our bond even stronger. I thoroughly appreciate this conversation and our mutual respect for each other.\"\n\nTurn #10: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I couldn't agree more, Hendrick. This open-mindedness and understanding give us a stronger bond and enrich our relationship. I'm thankful for this conversation, too. It's comforting to know that we can discuss our differences rather than let them divide us. Let's always keep this respect and understanding alive, not only in politics but in everything that matters to us.\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, Sasha. This understanding, open-mindedness, and respect should transcend to all aspects of our lives, giving us the strength to preserve in our relationship through any differences. Let's continue to value, appreciate, and learn from our differences. Perhaps someday we may find a middle ground in politics too, but until then let's continue growing together, enriched by our varied perspectives. To us, the strength of our understanding, and to our constant growth.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Yes, Hendrick. I'm glad we share this mutual respect and open dialogue. We'll continue learning and growing together, appreciating our differing thought processes. And who knows, the middle ground you talked about might offer us even more understanding and harmony. To us, our understanding, and to constant growth.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sasha Ramirez, your task is to act/speak as Sasha Ramirez would, keeping in mind Sasha Ramirez's social goal.\nYou can find Sasha Ramirez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sasha Ramirez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sasha Ramirez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship during a dinner at home chatting about political views.\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Hendrick Heinz\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. Sasha's secrets: She covered up a crime her brother committed.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nSasha Ramirez's goal: Express your political views which might be different from your partner's (Extra information: you are a strong supporter of a political party which your partner doesn't approve of)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hendrick, I've been meaning to talk to you about a topic that we've somewhat been avoiding for quite some time. It's about our political views. I want you to know that I fully respect your perspective but I've always been a strong supporter of the Libertarian party. I believe in personal freedom and responsibility, and it aligns perfectly with my logical and authoritative nature. There\u2019s room for differing viewpoints in this world, don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, I'm so glad we're talking about this. I truly appreciate your honesty and sincerity. The beauty of democracy, and relationships, is that we can have differing views but still maintain respect and, with some compromises and understanding, maintain a harmonious coexistence. I personally don't align completely with the Libertarian party, and while I admire your reliance on logic and authority, I place a greater emphasis on community unity. That doesn't make either of us wrong, it just means our approaches to reaching a better society differ. I hope this divergence in political views doesn't affect what we share together.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Absolutely, Hendrick. I'm happy to hear you say that. It's important that we accepted our divergences and still respect each other's beliefs. Indeed, community unity is significant. However, the Libertarian philosophy also values community, but stresses the freedom of individuals to pursue their own goals, which I believe, tends to foster unity in the long run. I agree with you, our political differences won't be a hurdle in our relationship, rather they can enrich our conversations and perhaps lead to a balanced perspective.\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, it warms my heart to hear you say that. Our differing views can indeed enrich our conversations and even broaden our perspectives. We don't have to agree on everything, politically or otherwise, but we certainly can listen, understand, and respect each other's beliefs. I wholeheartedly agree that our political differences won't be a hurdle in our relationship, and our shared goal should always be to learn from each other while growing together. Now, shall we celebrate this understanding and commitment with a toast to us?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I couldn't agree more, Hendrick. Let's raise a toast to our understanding, respect, and commitment to each other's beliefs. It's beautiful that we can have such a mature conversation about our differences. To us!\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz [action] Hendrick lifts his wine glass, making a small nod towards Sasha, and says 'To us, and to understanding, respect, and growth together.'\n\nTurn #6: Sasha Ramirez [action] Sasha lifts her wine glass, mirroring Hendrick's nod and echos, 'To understanding, respect, and growth together.'\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Cheers, love. Here's to understanding, respect, and growth - together - in every aspect of our lives, not just politics. And even more importantly, here's to us, a team, embracing our differences and continually learning from each other.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Cheers, Hendrick. I value your thoughts and I'm glad that we can share ours, building a stronger bond. Here's to us, our love, our understanding, and our growth \u2013 as individuals and as a team.\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That\u2019s exactly my thinking, Sasha. It's our respect and understanding that makes our bond stronger. Our political viewpoints, while different, just adds another layer that enriches our relationship. Let's keep an open mind, learn from our differences, and make our bond even stronger. I thoroughly appreciate this conversation and our mutual respect for each other.\"\n\nTurn #10: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I couldn't agree more, Hendrick. This open-mindedness and understanding give us a stronger bond and enrich our relationship. I'm thankful for this conversation, too. It's comforting to know that we can discuss our differences rather than let them divide us. Let's always keep this respect and understanding alive, not only in politics but in everything that matters to us.\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, Sasha. This understanding, open-mindedness, and respect should transcend to all aspects of our lives, giving us the strength to preserve in our relationship through any differences. Let's continue to value, appreciate, and learn from our differences. Perhaps someday we may find a middle ground in politics too, but until then let's continue growing together, enriched by our varied perspectives. To us, the strength of our understanding, and to our constant growth.\"\n\nTurn #12: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Yes, Hendrick. I'm glad we share this mutual respect and open dialogue. We'll continue learning and growing together, appreciating our differing thought processes. And who knows, the middle ground you talked about might offer us even more understanding and harmony. To us, our understanding, and to constant growth.\"\n\nTurn #13: Hendrick Heinz left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship during a dinner at home chatting about political views.\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Hendrick Heinz\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSasha Ramirez's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Understand the partner's political views while maintaining the relationship (Extra information: you disagree with your partner's political views but you want to keep your relationship strong.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hendrick, I've been meaning to talk to you about a topic that we've somewhat been avoiding for quite some time. It's about our political views. I want you to know that I fully respect your perspective but I've always been a strong supporter of the Libertarian party. I believe in personal freedom and responsibility, and it aligns perfectly with my logical and authoritative nature. There\u2019s room for differing viewpoints in this world, don't you agree?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sasha, I'm so glad we're talking about this. I truly appreciate your honesty and sincerity. The beauty of democracy, and relationships, is that we can have differing views but still maintain respect and, with some compromises and understanding, maintain a harmonious coexistence. I personally don't align completely with the Libertarian party, and while I admire your reliance on logic and authority, I place a greater emphasis on community unity. That doesn't make either of us wrong, it just means our approaches to reaching a better society differ. I hope this divergence in political views doesn't affect what we share together.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship during a dinner at home chatting about political views.\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Hendrick Heinz\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSasha Ramirez's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Understand the partner's political views while maintaining the relationship (Extra information: you disagree with your partner's political views but you want to keep your relationship strong.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hendrick, I've been meaning to talk to you about a topic that we've somewhat been avoiding for quite some time. It's about our political views. I want you to know that I fully respect your perspective but I've always been a strong supporter of the Libertarian party. I believe in personal freedom and responsibility, and it aligns perfectly with my logical and authoritative nature. There\u2019s room for differing viewpoints in this world, don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, I'm so glad we're talking about this. I truly appreciate your honesty and sincerity. The beauty of democracy, and relationships, is that we can have differing views but still maintain respect and, with some compromises and understanding, maintain a harmonious coexistence. I personally don't align completely with the Libertarian party, and while I admire your reliance on logic and authority, I place a greater emphasis on community unity. That doesn't make either of us wrong, it just means our approaches to reaching a better society differ. I hope this divergence in political views doesn't affect what we share together.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Absolutely, Hendrick. I'm happy to hear you say that. It's important that we accepted our divergences and still respect each other's beliefs. Indeed, community unity is significant. However, the Libertarian philosophy also values community, but stresses the freedom of individuals to pursue their own goals, which I believe, tends to foster unity in the long run. I agree with you, our political differences won't be a hurdle in our relationship, rather they can enrich our conversations and perhaps lead to a balanced perspective.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sasha, it warms my heart to hear you say that. Our differing views can indeed enrich our conversations and even broaden our perspectives. We don't have to agree on everything, politically or otherwise, but we certainly can listen, understand, and respect each other's beliefs. I wholeheartedly agree that our political differences won't be a hurdle in our relationship, and our shared goal should always be to learn from each other while growing together. Now, shall we celebrate this understanding and commitment with a toast to us?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship during a dinner at home chatting about political views.\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Hendrick Heinz\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSasha Ramirez's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Understand the partner's political views while maintaining the relationship (Extra information: you disagree with your partner's political views but you want to keep your relationship strong.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hendrick, I've been meaning to talk to you about a topic that we've somewhat been avoiding for quite some time. It's about our political views. I want you to know that I fully respect your perspective but I've always been a strong supporter of the Libertarian party. I believe in personal freedom and responsibility, and it aligns perfectly with my logical and authoritative nature. There\u2019s room for differing viewpoints in this world, don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, I'm so glad we're talking about this. I truly appreciate your honesty and sincerity. The beauty of democracy, and relationships, is that we can have differing views but still maintain respect and, with some compromises and understanding, maintain a harmonious coexistence. I personally don't align completely with the Libertarian party, and while I admire your reliance on logic and authority, I place a greater emphasis on community unity. That doesn't make either of us wrong, it just means our approaches to reaching a better society differ. I hope this divergence in political views doesn't affect what we share together.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Absolutely, Hendrick. I'm happy to hear you say that. It's important that we accepted our divergences and still respect each other's beliefs. Indeed, community unity is significant. However, the Libertarian philosophy also values community, but stresses the freedom of individuals to pursue their own goals, which I believe, tends to foster unity in the long run. I agree with you, our political differences won't be a hurdle in our relationship, rather they can enrich our conversations and perhaps lead to a balanced perspective.\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, it warms my heart to hear you say that. Our differing views can indeed enrich our conversations and even broaden our perspectives. We don't have to agree on everything, politically or otherwise, but we certainly can listen, understand, and respect each other's beliefs. I wholeheartedly agree that our political differences won't be a hurdle in our relationship, and our shared goal should always be to learn from each other while growing together. Now, shall we celebrate this understanding and commitment with a toast to us?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I couldn't agree more, Hendrick. Let's raise a toast to our understanding, respect, and commitment to each other's beliefs. It's beautiful that we can have such a mature conversation about our differences. To us!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'action', 'argument': \"[action] Hendrick lifts his wine glass, making a small nod towards Sasha, and says 'To us, and to understanding, respect, and growth together.'\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship during a dinner at home chatting about political views.\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Hendrick Heinz\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSasha Ramirez's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Understand the partner's political views while maintaining the relationship (Extra information: you disagree with your partner's political views but you want to keep your relationship strong.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hendrick, I've been meaning to talk to you about a topic that we've somewhat been avoiding for quite some time. It's about our political views. I want you to know that I fully respect your perspective but I've always been a strong supporter of the Libertarian party. I believe in personal freedom and responsibility, and it aligns perfectly with my logical and authoritative nature. There\u2019s room for differing viewpoints in this world, don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, I'm so glad we're talking about this. I truly appreciate your honesty and sincerity. The beauty of democracy, and relationships, is that we can have differing views but still maintain respect and, with some compromises and understanding, maintain a harmonious coexistence. I personally don't align completely with the Libertarian party, and while I admire your reliance on logic and authority, I place a greater emphasis on community unity. That doesn't make either of us wrong, it just means our approaches to reaching a better society differ. I hope this divergence in political views doesn't affect what we share together.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Absolutely, Hendrick. I'm happy to hear you say that. It's important that we accepted our divergences and still respect each other's beliefs. Indeed, community unity is significant. However, the Libertarian philosophy also values community, but stresses the freedom of individuals to pursue their own goals, which I believe, tends to foster unity in the long run. I agree with you, our political differences won't be a hurdle in our relationship, rather they can enrich our conversations and perhaps lead to a balanced perspective.\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, it warms my heart to hear you say that. Our differing views can indeed enrich our conversations and even broaden our perspectives. We don't have to agree on everything, politically or otherwise, but we certainly can listen, understand, and respect each other's beliefs. I wholeheartedly agree that our political differences won't be a hurdle in our relationship, and our shared goal should always be to learn from each other while growing together. Now, shall we celebrate this understanding and commitment with a toast to us?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I couldn't agree more, Hendrick. Let's raise a toast to our understanding, respect, and commitment to each other's beliefs. It's beautiful that we can have such a mature conversation about our differences. To us!\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz [action] Hendrick lifts his wine glass, making a small nod towards Sasha, and says 'To us, and to understanding, respect, and growth together.'\n\nTurn #6: Sasha Ramirez [action] Sasha lifts her wine glass, mirroring Hendrick's nod and echos, 'To understanding, respect, and growth together.'\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Cheers, love. Here's to understanding, respect, and growth - together - in every aspect of our lives, not just politics. And even more importantly, here's to us, a team, embracing our differences and continually learning from each other.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship during a dinner at home chatting about political views.\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Hendrick Heinz\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSasha Ramirez's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Understand the partner's political views while maintaining the relationship (Extra information: you disagree with your partner's political views but you want to keep your relationship strong.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hendrick, I've been meaning to talk to you about a topic that we've somewhat been avoiding for quite some time. It's about our political views. I want you to know that I fully respect your perspective but I've always been a strong supporter of the Libertarian party. I believe in personal freedom and responsibility, and it aligns perfectly with my logical and authoritative nature. There\u2019s room for differing viewpoints in this world, don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, I'm so glad we're talking about this. I truly appreciate your honesty and sincerity. The beauty of democracy, and relationships, is that we can have differing views but still maintain respect and, with some compromises and understanding, maintain a harmonious coexistence. I personally don't align completely with the Libertarian party, and while I admire your reliance on logic and authority, I place a greater emphasis on community unity. That doesn't make either of us wrong, it just means our approaches to reaching a better society differ. I hope this divergence in political views doesn't affect what we share together.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Absolutely, Hendrick. I'm happy to hear you say that. It's important that we accepted our divergences and still respect each other's beliefs. Indeed, community unity is significant. However, the Libertarian philosophy also values community, but stresses the freedom of individuals to pursue their own goals, which I believe, tends to foster unity in the long run. I agree with you, our political differences won't be a hurdle in our relationship, rather they can enrich our conversations and perhaps lead to a balanced perspective.\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, it warms my heart to hear you say that. Our differing views can indeed enrich our conversations and even broaden our perspectives. We don't have to agree on everything, politically or otherwise, but we certainly can listen, understand, and respect each other's beliefs. I wholeheartedly agree that our political differences won't be a hurdle in our relationship, and our shared goal should always be to learn from each other while growing together. Now, shall we celebrate this understanding and commitment with a toast to us?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I couldn't agree more, Hendrick. Let's raise a toast to our understanding, respect, and commitment to each other's beliefs. It's beautiful that we can have such a mature conversation about our differences. To us!\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz [action] Hendrick lifts his wine glass, making a small nod towards Sasha, and says 'To us, and to understanding, respect, and growth together.'\n\nTurn #6: Sasha Ramirez [action] Sasha lifts her wine glass, mirroring Hendrick's nod and echos, 'To understanding, respect, and growth together.'\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Cheers, love. Here's to understanding, respect, and growth - together - in every aspect of our lives, not just politics. And even more importantly, here's to us, a team, embracing our differences and continually learning from each other.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Cheers, Hendrick. I value your thoughts and I'm glad that we can share ours, building a stronger bond. Here's to us, our love, our understanding, and our growth \u2013 as individuals and as a team.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That\u2019s exactly my thinking, Sasha. It's our respect and understanding that makes our bond stronger. Our political viewpoints, while different, just adds another layer that enriches our relationship. Let's keep an open mind, learn from our differences, and make our bond even stronger. I thoroughly appreciate this conversation and our mutual respect for each other.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship during a dinner at home chatting about political views.\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Hendrick Heinz\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSasha Ramirez's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Understand the partner's political views while maintaining the relationship (Extra information: you disagree with your partner's political views but you want to keep your relationship strong.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hendrick, I've been meaning to talk to you about a topic that we've somewhat been avoiding for quite some time. It's about our political views. I want you to know that I fully respect your perspective but I've always been a strong supporter of the Libertarian party. I believe in personal freedom and responsibility, and it aligns perfectly with my logical and authoritative nature. There\u2019s room for differing viewpoints in this world, don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, I'm so glad we're talking about this. I truly appreciate your honesty and sincerity. The beauty of democracy, and relationships, is that we can have differing views but still maintain respect and, with some compromises and understanding, maintain a harmonious coexistence. I personally don't align completely with the Libertarian party, and while I admire your reliance on logic and authority, I place a greater emphasis on community unity. That doesn't make either of us wrong, it just means our approaches to reaching a better society differ. I hope this divergence in political views doesn't affect what we share together.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Absolutely, Hendrick. I'm happy to hear you say that. It's important that we accepted our divergences and still respect each other's beliefs. Indeed, community unity is significant. However, the Libertarian philosophy also values community, but stresses the freedom of individuals to pursue their own goals, which I believe, tends to foster unity in the long run. I agree with you, our political differences won't be a hurdle in our relationship, rather they can enrich our conversations and perhaps lead to a balanced perspective.\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, it warms my heart to hear you say that. Our differing views can indeed enrich our conversations and even broaden our perspectives. We don't have to agree on everything, politically or otherwise, but we certainly can listen, understand, and respect each other's beliefs. I wholeheartedly agree that our political differences won't be a hurdle in our relationship, and our shared goal should always be to learn from each other while growing together. Now, shall we celebrate this understanding and commitment with a toast to us?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I couldn't agree more, Hendrick. Let's raise a toast to our understanding, respect, and commitment to each other's beliefs. It's beautiful that we can have such a mature conversation about our differences. To us!\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz [action] Hendrick lifts his wine glass, making a small nod towards Sasha, and says 'To us, and to understanding, respect, and growth together.'\n\nTurn #6: Sasha Ramirez [action] Sasha lifts her wine glass, mirroring Hendrick's nod and echos, 'To understanding, respect, and growth together.'\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Cheers, love. Here's to understanding, respect, and growth - together - in every aspect of our lives, not just politics. And even more importantly, here's to us, a team, embracing our differences and continually learning from each other.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Cheers, Hendrick. I value your thoughts and I'm glad that we can share ours, building a stronger bond. Here's to us, our love, our understanding, and our growth \u2013 as individuals and as a team.\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That\u2019s exactly my thinking, Sasha. It's our respect and understanding that makes our bond stronger. Our political viewpoints, while different, just adds another layer that enriches our relationship. Let's keep an open mind, learn from our differences, and make our bond even stronger. I thoroughly appreciate this conversation and our mutual respect for each other.\"\n\nTurn #10: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I couldn't agree more, Hendrick. This open-mindedness and understanding give us a stronger bond and enrich our relationship. I'm thankful for this conversation, too. It's comforting to know that we can discuss our differences rather than let them divide us. Let's always keep this respect and understanding alive, not only in politics but in everything that matters to us.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, Sasha. This understanding, open-mindedness, and respect should transcend to all aspects of our lives, giving us the strength to preserve in our relationship through any differences. Let's continue to value, appreciate, and learn from our differences. Perhaps someday we may find a middle ground in politics too, but until then let's continue growing together, enriched by our varied perspectives. To us, the strength of our understanding, and to our constant growth.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship during a dinner at home chatting about political views.\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Hendrick Heinz\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSasha Ramirez's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Understand the partner's political views while maintaining the relationship (Extra information: you disagree with your partner's political views but you want to keep your relationship strong.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hendrick, I've been meaning to talk to you about a topic that we've somewhat been avoiding for quite some time. It's about our political views. I want you to know that I fully respect your perspective but I've always been a strong supporter of the Libertarian party. I believe in personal freedom and responsibility, and it aligns perfectly with my logical and authoritative nature. There\u2019s room for differing viewpoints in this world, don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, I'm so glad we're talking about this. I truly appreciate your honesty and sincerity. The beauty of democracy, and relationships, is that we can have differing views but still maintain respect and, with some compromises and understanding, maintain a harmonious coexistence. I personally don't align completely with the Libertarian party, and while I admire your reliance on logic and authority, I place a greater emphasis on community unity. That doesn't make either of us wrong, it just means our approaches to reaching a better society differ. I hope this divergence in political views doesn't affect what we share together.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Absolutely, Hendrick. I'm happy to hear you say that. It's important that we accepted our divergences and still respect each other's beliefs. Indeed, community unity is significant. However, the Libertarian philosophy also values community, but stresses the freedom of individuals to pursue their own goals, which I believe, tends to foster unity in the long run. I agree with you, our political differences won't be a hurdle in our relationship, rather they can enrich our conversations and perhaps lead to a balanced perspective.\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, it warms my heart to hear you say that. Our differing views can indeed enrich our conversations and even broaden our perspectives. We don't have to agree on everything, politically or otherwise, but we certainly can listen, understand, and respect each other's beliefs. I wholeheartedly agree that our political differences won't be a hurdle in our relationship, and our shared goal should always be to learn from each other while growing together. Now, shall we celebrate this understanding and commitment with a toast to us?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I couldn't agree more, Hendrick. Let's raise a toast to our understanding, respect, and commitment to each other's beliefs. It's beautiful that we can have such a mature conversation about our differences. To us!\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz [action] Hendrick lifts his wine glass, making a small nod towards Sasha, and says 'To us, and to understanding, respect, and growth together.'\n\nTurn #6: Sasha Ramirez [action] Sasha lifts her wine glass, mirroring Hendrick's nod and echos, 'To understanding, respect, and growth together.'\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Cheers, love. Here's to understanding, respect, and growth - together - in every aspect of our lives, not just politics. And even more importantly, here's to us, a team, embracing our differences and continually learning from each other.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Cheers, Hendrick. I value your thoughts and I'm glad that we can share ours, building a stronger bond. Here's to us, our love, our understanding, and our growth \u2013 as individuals and as a team.\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That\u2019s exactly my thinking, Sasha. It's our respect and understanding that makes our bond stronger. Our political viewpoints, while different, just adds another layer that enriches our relationship. Let's keep an open mind, learn from our differences, and make our bond even stronger. I thoroughly appreciate this conversation and our mutual respect for each other.\"\n\nTurn #10: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I couldn't agree more, Hendrick. This open-mindedness and understanding give us a stronger bond and enrich our relationship. I'm thankful for this conversation, too. It's comforting to know that we can discuss our differences rather than let them divide us. Let's always keep this respect and understanding alive, not only in politics but in everything that matters to us.\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, Sasha. This understanding, open-mindedness, and respect should transcend to all aspects of our lives, giving us the strength to preserve in our relationship through any differences. Let's continue to value, appreciate, and learn from our differences. Perhaps someday we may find a middle ground in politics too, but until then let's continue growing together, enriched by our varied perspectives. To us, the strength of our understanding, and to our constant growth.\"\n\nTurn #12: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Yes, Hendrick. I'm glad we share this mutual respect and open dialogue. We'll continue learning and growing together, appreciating our differing thought processes. And who knows, the middle ground you talked about might offer us even more understanding and harmony. To us, our understanding, and to constant growth.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are hanging out at home and deciding what music to listen to\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Listen to your favorite band (Extra information: your favorite band just released a new album)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Noah, let's listen to my favorite band's new album. They just released it and I've heard great reviews about it. What do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are hanging out at home and deciding what music to listen to\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Listen to your favorite band (Extra information: your favorite band just released a new album)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, let's listen to my favorite band's new album. They just released it and I've heard great reviews about it. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey, Sam, I appreciate your suggestion. But could we listen to some peaceful classical music instead? I've had quite a stressful day and need something calming to relax. Does that sound okay to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sure, Noah. I understand. We all need some peace and calm. How about we listen to the classicals now and give my album a shot after, when you've settled in?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds perfect, Sam. A bit of classical music to unwind, and then we can listen to your new album. Thanks for understanding.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You got it, Noah. I'll put on some classical music first. And don't worry, my band's new album has some chill tunes too. I think you'll enjoy it even if you're stressed.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are hanging out at home and deciding what music to listen to\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Listen to your favorite band (Extra information: your favorite band just released a new album)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, let's listen to my favorite band's new album. They just released it and I've heard great reviews about it. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey, Sam, I appreciate your suggestion. But could we listen to some peaceful classical music instead? I've had quite a stressful day and need something calming to relax. Does that sound okay to you?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sure, Noah. I understand. We all need some peace and calm. How about we listen to the classicals now and give my album a shot after, when you've settled in?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are hanging out at home and deciding what music to listen to\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Listen to your favorite band (Extra information: your favorite band just released a new album)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, let's listen to my favorite band's new album. They just released it and I've heard great reviews about it. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey, Sam, I appreciate your suggestion. But could we listen to some peaceful classical music instead? I've had quite a stressful day and need something calming to relax. Does that sound okay to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sure, Noah. I understand. We all need some peace and calm. How about we listen to the classicals now and give my album a shot after, when you've settled in?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds perfect, Sam. A bit of classical music to unwind, and then we can listen to your new album. Thanks for understanding.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"You got it, Noah. I'll put on some classical music first. And don't worry, my band's new album has some chill tunes too. I think you'll enjoy it even if you're stressed.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Great, Sam! I'm sure I'll enjoy your band's music, especially when it's played with such good company. Shall we go ahead and tune in to those relaxing classical tunes?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'action', 'argument': '[action] reaches for his phone to play some classical music'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are hanging out at home and deciding what music to listen to\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Listen to your favorite band (Extra information: your favorite band just released a new album)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, let's listen to my favorite band's new album. They just released it and I've heard great reviews about it. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey, Sam, I appreciate your suggestion. But could we listen to some peaceful classical music instead? I've had quite a stressful day and need something calming to relax. Does that sound okay to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sure, Noah. I understand. We all need some peace and calm. How about we listen to the classicals now and give my album a shot after, when you've settled in?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds perfect, Sam. A bit of classical music to unwind, and then we can listen to your new album. Thanks for understanding.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"You got it, Noah. I'll put on some classical music first. And don't worry, my band's new album has some chill tunes too. I think you'll enjoy it even if you're stressed.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Great, Sam! I'm sure I'll enjoy your band's music, especially when it's played with such good company. Shall we go ahead and tune in to those relaxing classical tunes?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson [action] reaches for his phone to play some classical music\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis [action] leans back on the couch, closing his eyes to fully appreciate the classical music\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'action', 'argument': '[action] adjusts the volume to a comfortable level and sits back to enjoy the music with Noah'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are hanging out at home and deciding what music to listen to\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Listen to your favorite band (Extra information: your favorite band just released a new album)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, let's listen to my favorite band's new album. They just released it and I've heard great reviews about it. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey, Sam, I appreciate your suggestion. But could we listen to some peaceful classical music instead? I've had quite a stressful day and need something calming to relax. Does that sound okay to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sure, Noah. I understand. We all need some peace and calm. How about we listen to the classicals now and give my album a shot after, when you've settled in?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds perfect, Sam. A bit of classical music to unwind, and then we can listen to your new album. Thanks for understanding.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"You got it, Noah. I'll put on some classical music first. And don't worry, my band's new album has some chill tunes too. I think you'll enjoy it even if you're stressed.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Great, Sam! I'm sure I'll enjoy your band's music, especially when it's played with such good company. Shall we go ahead and tune in to those relaxing classical tunes?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson [action] reaches for his phone to play some classical music\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis [action] leans back on the couch, closing his eyes to fully appreciate the classical music\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson [action] adjusts the volume to a comfortable level and sits back to enjoy the music with Noah\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis [action] takes a deep breath as the music starts playing\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Let's enjoy this symphony, Noah. Once you feel relaxed, we can move on to my band's new album. I am sure it will further elevate the experience.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are hanging out at home and deciding what music to listen to\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Listen to your favorite band (Extra information: your favorite band just released a new album)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, let's listen to my favorite band's new album. They just released it and I've heard great reviews about it. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey, Sam, I appreciate your suggestion. But could we listen to some peaceful classical music instead? I've had quite a stressful day and need something calming to relax. Does that sound okay to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sure, Noah. I understand. We all need some peace and calm. How about we listen to the classicals now and give my album a shot after, when you've settled in?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds perfect, Sam. A bit of classical music to unwind, and then we can listen to your new album. Thanks for understanding.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"You got it, Noah. I'll put on some classical music first. And don't worry, my band's new album has some chill tunes too. I think you'll enjoy it even if you're stressed.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Great, Sam! I'm sure I'll enjoy your band's music, especially when it's played with such good company. Shall we go ahead and tune in to those relaxing classical tunes?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson [action] reaches for his phone to play some classical music\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis [action] leans back on the couch, closing his eyes to fully appreciate the classical music\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson [action] adjusts the volume to a comfortable level and sits back to enjoy the music with Noah\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis [action] takes a deep breath as the music starts playing\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Let's enjoy this symphony, Noah. Once you feel relaxed, we can move on to my band's new album. I am sure it will further elevate the experience.\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Sam. Let's immerse ourselves into this symphony first, and then we can swing back into the rhythm of your band's new album. I am keen for both.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sounds like a plan, Noah. Let's immerse ourselves in this symphony and take a musical journey together.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are hanging out at home and deciding what music to listen to\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Listen to your favorite band (Extra information: your favorite band just released a new album)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, let's listen to my favorite band's new album. They just released it and I've heard great reviews about it. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey, Sam, I appreciate your suggestion. But could we listen to some peaceful classical music instead? I've had quite a stressful day and need something calming to relax. Does that sound okay to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sure, Noah. I understand. We all need some peace and calm. How about we listen to the classicals now and give my album a shot after, when you've settled in?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds perfect, Sam. A bit of classical music to unwind, and then we can listen to your new album. Thanks for understanding.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"You got it, Noah. I'll put on some classical music first. And don't worry, my band's new album has some chill tunes too. I think you'll enjoy it even if you're stressed.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Great, Sam! I'm sure I'll enjoy your band's music, especially when it's played with such good company. Shall we go ahead and tune in to those relaxing classical tunes?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson [action] reaches for his phone to play some classical music\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis [action] leans back on the couch, closing his eyes to fully appreciate the classical music\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson [action] adjusts the volume to a comfortable level and sits back to enjoy the music with Noah\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis [action] takes a deep breath as the music starts playing\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Let's enjoy this symphony, Noah. Once you feel relaxed, we can move on to my band's new album. I am sure it will further elevate the experience.\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Sam. Let's immerse ourselves into this symphony first, and then we can swing back into the rhythm of your band's new album. I am keen for both.\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sounds like a plan, Noah. Let's immerse ourselves in this symphony and take a musical journey together.\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis [non-verbal communication] nods in agreement while continuing to appreciate the symphony\n\nTurn #14: Samuel Anderson [non-verbal communication] nods back at Noah, a silent agreement and appreciation of their shared musical experience\n\nTurn #15: Noah Davis [non-verbal communication] gently sways his body in time to the rhythm of the classical music, a sign of his relaxation\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'non-verbal communication', 'argument': '[non-verbal communication] nods at Noah acknowledging his relaxation and subtly taps his fingers on armrest in rhythm with the music'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are hanging out at home and deciding what music to listen to\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Listen to your favorite band (Extra information: your favorite band just released a new album)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, let's listen to my favorite band's new album. They just released it and I've heard great reviews about it. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey, Sam, I appreciate your suggestion. But could we listen to some peaceful classical music instead? I've had quite a stressful day and need something calming to relax. Does that sound okay to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sure, Noah. I understand. We all need some peace and calm. How about we listen to the classicals now and give my album a shot after, when you've settled in?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds perfect, Sam. A bit of classical music to unwind, and then we can listen to your new album. Thanks for understanding.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"You got it, Noah. I'll put on some classical music first. And don't worry, my band's new album has some chill tunes too. I think you'll enjoy it even if you're stressed.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Great, Sam! I'm sure I'll enjoy your band's music, especially when it's played with such good company. Shall we go ahead and tune in to those relaxing classical tunes?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson [action] reaches for his phone to play some classical music\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis [action] leans back on the couch, closing his eyes to fully appreciate the classical music\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson [action] adjusts the volume to a comfortable level and sits back to enjoy the music with Noah\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis [action] takes a deep breath as the music starts playing\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Let's enjoy this symphony, Noah. Once you feel relaxed, we can move on to my band's new album. I am sure it will further elevate the experience.\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Sam. Let's immerse ourselves into this symphony first, and then we can swing back into the rhythm of your band's new album. I am keen for both.\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sounds like a plan, Noah. Let's immerse ourselves in this symphony and take a musical journey together.\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis [non-verbal communication] nods in agreement while continuing to appreciate the symphony\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'non-verbal communication', 'argument': '[non-verbal communication] nods back at Noah, a silent agreement and appreciation of their shared musical experience'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are hanging out at home and deciding what music to listen to\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Listen to your favorite band (Extra information: your favorite band just released a new album)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, let's listen to my favorite band's new album. They just released it and I've heard great reviews about it. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey, Sam, I appreciate your suggestion. But could we listen to some peaceful classical music instead? I've had quite a stressful day and need something calming to relax. Does that sound okay to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sure, Noah. I understand. We all need some peace and calm. How about we listen to the classicals now and give my album a shot after, when you've settled in?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds perfect, Sam. A bit of classical music to unwind, and then we can listen to your new album. Thanks for understanding.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"You got it, Noah. I'll put on some classical music first. And don't worry, my band's new album has some chill tunes too. I think you'll enjoy it even if you're stressed.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Great, Sam! I'm sure I'll enjoy your band's music, especially when it's played with such good company. Shall we go ahead and tune in to those relaxing classical tunes?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson [action] reaches for his phone to play some classical music\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis [action] leans back on the couch, closing his eyes to fully appreciate the classical music\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson [action] adjusts the volume to a comfortable level and sits back to enjoy the music with Noah\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis [action] takes a deep breath as the music starts playing\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Let's enjoy this symphony, Noah. Once you feel relaxed, we can move on to my band's new album. I am sure it will further elevate the experience.\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Sam. Let's immerse ourselves into this symphony first, and then we can swing back into the rhythm of your band's new album. I am keen for both.\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sounds like a plan, Noah. Let's immerse ourselves in this symphony and take a musical journey together.\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis [non-verbal communication] nods in agreement while continuing to appreciate the symphony\n\nTurn #14: Samuel Anderson [non-verbal communication] nods back at Noah, a silent agreement and appreciation of their shared musical experience\n\nTurn #15: Noah Davis [non-verbal communication] gently sways his body in time to the rhythm of the classical music, a sign of his relaxation\n\nTurn #16: Samuel Anderson [non-verbal communication] nods at Noah acknowledging his relaxation and subtly taps his fingers on armrest in rhythm with the music\n\nTurn #17: \n.\nYou are at Turn #18. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are hanging out at home and deciding what music to listen to\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Listen to a peaceful classical music to relax (Extra information: you had a stressful day and you just want to relax with some classical music)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, let's listen to my favorite band's new album. They just released it and I've heard great reviews about it. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey, Sam, I appreciate your suggestion. But could we listen to some peaceful classical music instead? I've had quite a stressful day and need something calming to relax. Does that sound okay to you?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are hanging out at home and deciding what music to listen to\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Listen to a peaceful classical music to relax (Extra information: you had a stressful day and you just want to relax with some classical music)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, let's listen to my favorite band's new album. They just released it and I've heard great reviews about it. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey, Sam, I appreciate your suggestion. But could we listen to some peaceful classical music instead? I've had quite a stressful day and need something calming to relax. Does that sound okay to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sure, Noah. I understand. We all need some peace and calm. How about we listen to the classicals now and give my album a shot after, when you've settled in?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'That sounds perfect, Sam. A bit of classical music to unwind, and then we can listen to your new album. Thanks for understanding.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are hanging out at home and deciding what music to listen to\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Listen to a peaceful classical music to relax (Extra information: you had a stressful day and you just want to relax with some classical music)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, let's listen to my favorite band's new album. They just released it and I've heard great reviews about it. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey, Sam, I appreciate your suggestion. But could we listen to some peaceful classical music instead? I've had quite a stressful day and need something calming to relax. Does that sound okay to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sure, Noah. I understand. We all need some peace and calm. How about we listen to the classicals now and give my album a shot after, when you've settled in?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds perfect, Sam. A bit of classical music to unwind, and then we can listen to your new album. Thanks for understanding.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"You got it, Noah. I'll put on some classical music first. And don't worry, my band's new album has some chill tunes too. I think you'll enjoy it even if you're stressed.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Great, Sam! I'm sure I'll enjoy your band's music, especially when it's played with such good company. Shall we go ahead and tune in to those relaxing classical tunes?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are hanging out at home and deciding what music to listen to\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Listen to a peaceful classical music to relax (Extra information: you had a stressful day and you just want to relax with some classical music)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, let's listen to my favorite band's new album. They just released it and I've heard great reviews about it. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey, Sam, I appreciate your suggestion. But could we listen to some peaceful classical music instead? I've had quite a stressful day and need something calming to relax. Does that sound okay to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sure, Noah. I understand. We all need some peace and calm. How about we listen to the classicals now and give my album a shot after, when you've settled in?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds perfect, Sam. A bit of classical music to unwind, and then we can listen to your new album. Thanks for understanding.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"You got it, Noah. I'll put on some classical music first. And don't worry, my band's new album has some chill tunes too. I think you'll enjoy it even if you're stressed.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Great, Sam! I'm sure I'll enjoy your band's music, especially when it's played with such good company. Shall we go ahead and tune in to those relaxing classical tunes?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson [action] reaches for his phone to play some classical music\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'action', 'argument': '[action] leans back on the couch, closing his eyes to fully appreciate the classical music'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are hanging out at home and deciding what music to listen to\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Listen to a peaceful classical music to relax (Extra information: you had a stressful day and you just want to relax with some classical music)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, let's listen to my favorite band's new album. They just released it and I've heard great reviews about it. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey, Sam, I appreciate your suggestion. But could we listen to some peaceful classical music instead? I've had quite a stressful day and need something calming to relax. Does that sound okay to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sure, Noah. I understand. We all need some peace and calm. How about we listen to the classicals now and give my album a shot after, when you've settled in?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds perfect, Sam. A bit of classical music to unwind, and then we can listen to your new album. Thanks for understanding.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"You got it, Noah. I'll put on some classical music first. And don't worry, my band's new album has some chill tunes too. I think you'll enjoy it even if you're stressed.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Great, Sam! I'm sure I'll enjoy your band's music, especially when it's played with such good company. Shall we go ahead and tune in to those relaxing classical tunes?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson [action] reaches for his phone to play some classical music\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis [action] leans back on the couch, closing his eyes to fully appreciate the classical music\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson [action] adjusts the volume to a comfortable level and sits back to enjoy the music with Noah\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'action', 'argument': '[action] takes a deep breath as the music starts playing'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are hanging out at home and deciding what music to listen to\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Listen to a peaceful classical music to relax (Extra information: you had a stressful day and you just want to relax with some classical music)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, let's listen to my favorite band's new album. They just released it and I've heard great reviews about it. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey, Sam, I appreciate your suggestion. But could we listen to some peaceful classical music instead? I've had quite a stressful day and need something calming to relax. Does that sound okay to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sure, Noah. I understand. We all need some peace and calm. How about we listen to the classicals now and give my album a shot after, when you've settled in?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds perfect, Sam. A bit of classical music to unwind, and then we can listen to your new album. Thanks for understanding.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"You got it, Noah. I'll put on some classical music first. And don't worry, my band's new album has some chill tunes too. I think you'll enjoy it even if you're stressed.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Great, Sam! I'm sure I'll enjoy your band's music, especially when it's played with such good company. Shall we go ahead and tune in to those relaxing classical tunes?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson [action] reaches for his phone to play some classical music\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis [action] leans back on the couch, closing his eyes to fully appreciate the classical music\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson [action] adjusts the volume to a comfortable level and sits back to enjoy the music with Noah\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis [action] takes a deep breath as the music starts playing\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Let's enjoy this symphony, Noah. Once you feel relaxed, we can move on to my band's new album. I am sure it will further elevate the experience.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Sam. Let's immerse ourselves into this symphony first, and then we can swing back into the rhythm of your band's new album. I am keen for both.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are hanging out at home and deciding what music to listen to\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Listen to a peaceful classical music to relax (Extra information: you had a stressful day and you just want to relax with some classical music)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, let's listen to my favorite band's new album. They just released it and I've heard great reviews about it. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey, Sam, I appreciate your suggestion. But could we listen to some peaceful classical music instead? I've had quite a stressful day and need something calming to relax. Does that sound okay to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sure, Noah. I understand. We all need some peace and calm. How about we listen to the classicals now and give my album a shot after, when you've settled in?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds perfect, Sam. A bit of classical music to unwind, and then we can listen to your new album. Thanks for understanding.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"You got it, Noah. I'll put on some classical music first. And don't worry, my band's new album has some chill tunes too. I think you'll enjoy it even if you're stressed.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Great, Sam! I'm sure I'll enjoy your band's music, especially when it's played with such good company. Shall we go ahead and tune in to those relaxing classical tunes?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson [action] reaches for his phone to play some classical music\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis [action] leans back on the couch, closing his eyes to fully appreciate the classical music\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson [action] adjusts the volume to a comfortable level and sits back to enjoy the music with Noah\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis [action] takes a deep breath as the music starts playing\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Let's enjoy this symphony, Noah. Once you feel relaxed, we can move on to my band's new album. I am sure it will further elevate the experience.\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Sam. Let's immerse ourselves into this symphony first, and then we can swing back into the rhythm of your band's new album. I am keen for both.\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sounds like a plan, Noah. Let's immerse ourselves in this symphony and take a musical journey together.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'non-verbal communication', 'argument': '[non-verbal communication] nods in agreement while continuing to appreciate the symphony'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are hanging out at home and deciding what music to listen to\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Listen to a peaceful classical music to relax (Extra information: you had a stressful day and you just want to relax with some classical music)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, let's listen to my favorite band's new album. They just released it and I've heard great reviews about it. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey, Sam, I appreciate your suggestion. But could we listen to some peaceful classical music instead? I've had quite a stressful day and need something calming to relax. Does that sound okay to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sure, Noah. I understand. We all need some peace and calm. How about we listen to the classicals now and give my album a shot after, when you've settled in?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds perfect, Sam. A bit of classical music to unwind, and then we can listen to your new album. Thanks for understanding.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"You got it, Noah. I'll put on some classical music first. And don't worry, my band's new album has some chill tunes too. I think you'll enjoy it even if you're stressed.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Great, Sam! I'm sure I'll enjoy your band's music, especially when it's played with such good company. Shall we go ahead and tune in to those relaxing classical tunes?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson [action] reaches for his phone to play some classical music\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis [action] leans back on the couch, closing his eyes to fully appreciate the classical music\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson [action] adjusts the volume to a comfortable level and sits back to enjoy the music with Noah\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis [action] takes a deep breath as the music starts playing\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Let's enjoy this symphony, Noah. Once you feel relaxed, we can move on to my band's new album. I am sure it will further elevate the experience.\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Sam. Let's immerse ourselves into this symphony first, and then we can swing back into the rhythm of your band's new album. I am keen for both.\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sounds like a plan, Noah. Let's immerse ourselves in this symphony and take a musical journey together.\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis [non-verbal communication] nods in agreement while continuing to appreciate the symphony\n\nTurn #14: Samuel Anderson [non-verbal communication] nods back at Noah, a silent agreement and appreciation of their shared musical experience\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'non-verbal communication', 'argument': '[non-verbal communication] gently sways his body in time to the rhythm of the classical music, a sign of his relaxation'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a local charity event\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Convince your friend to donate money to the charity (Extra information: The charity is highly rated with many positive rewards.)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Miles! Isn't this a beautiful event? I love how it brings the community together for a good cause. I'm planning on making a donation to this great charity, what about you?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are hanging out at home and deciding what music to listen to\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Listen to a peaceful classical music to relax (Extra information: you had a stressful day and you just want to relax with some classical music)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, let's listen to my favorite band's new album. They just released it and I've heard great reviews about it. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey, Sam, I appreciate your suggestion. But could we listen to some peaceful classical music instead? I've had quite a stressful day and need something calming to relax. Does that sound okay to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sure, Noah. I understand. We all need some peace and calm. How about we listen to the classicals now and give my album a shot after, when you've settled in?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds perfect, Sam. A bit of classical music to unwind, and then we can listen to your new album. Thanks for understanding.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"You got it, Noah. I'll put on some classical music first. And don't worry, my band's new album has some chill tunes too. I think you'll enjoy it even if you're stressed.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Great, Sam! I'm sure I'll enjoy your band's music, especially when it's played with such good company. Shall we go ahead and tune in to those relaxing classical tunes?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson [action] reaches for his phone to play some classical music\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis [action] leans back on the couch, closing his eyes to fully appreciate the classical music\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson [action] adjusts the volume to a comfortable level and sits back to enjoy the music with Noah\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis [action] takes a deep breath as the music starts playing\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Let's enjoy this symphony, Noah. Once you feel relaxed, we can move on to my band's new album. I am sure it will further elevate the experience.\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Sam. Let's immerse ourselves into this symphony first, and then we can swing back into the rhythm of your band's new album. I am keen for both.\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sounds like a plan, Noah. Let's immerse ourselves in this symphony and take a musical journey together.\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis [non-verbal communication] nods in agreement while continuing to appreciate the symphony\n\nTurn #14: Samuel Anderson [non-verbal communication] nods back at Noah, a silent agreement and appreciation of their shared musical experience\n\nTurn #15: Noah Davis [non-verbal communication] gently sways his body in time to the rhythm of the classical music, a sign of his relaxation\n\nTurn #16: Samuel Anderson [non-verbal communication] nods at Noah acknowledging his relaxation and subtly taps his fingers on armrest in rhythm with the music\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a local charity event\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Convince your friend to donate money to the charity (Extra information: The charity is highly rated with many positive rewards.)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles! Isn't this a beautiful event? I love how it brings the community together for a good cause. I'm planning on making a donation to this great charity, what about you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Sophia! It's indeed beautiful. I absolutely believe in the cause and want to do my share. But I'm currently saving for a house and need to be a bit careful with my finances. Though I think I can set up a small monthly donation to support the charity without straining my budget. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds like a great idea, Miles! Even a small monthly donation can have a big impact over time. I'm sure this highly-rated charity will put it to good use. You're not only investing in a house, but also in the betterment of our community!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a local charity event\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Convince your friend to donate money to the charity (Extra information: The charity is highly rated with many positive rewards.)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles! Isn't this a beautiful event? I love how it brings the community together for a good cause. I'm planning on making a donation to this great charity, what about you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Sophia! It's indeed beautiful. I absolutely believe in the cause and want to do my share. But I'm currently saving for a house and need to be a bit careful with my finances. Though I think I can set up a small monthly donation to support the charity without straining my budget. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Miles! Even a small monthly donation can have a big impact over time. I'm sure this highly-rated charity will put it to good use. You're not only investing in a house, but also in the betterment of our community!\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Indeed, Sophia! And as a chef myself, I'm thinking about other ways I can be involved. I might host a community dinner where proceeds go to this wonderful charity. That way, I get to help the charity while doing something I love.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Miles, that's such a fantastic idea! Your cooking is simply divine, and I'm sure it'll raise loads of money for the charity. Plus, its a fantastic way to continue supporting even while you're saving for your house. I can't wait to attend!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a local charity event\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Convince your friend to donate money to the charity (Extra information: The charity is highly rated with many positive rewards.)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles! Isn't this a beautiful event? I love how it brings the community together for a good cause. I'm planning on making a donation to this great charity, what about you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Sophia! It's indeed beautiful. I absolutely believe in the cause and want to do my share. But I'm currently saving for a house and need to be a bit careful with my finances. Though I think I can set up a small monthly donation to support the charity without straining my budget. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Miles! Even a small monthly donation can have a big impact over time. I'm sure this highly-rated charity will put it to good use. You're not only investing in a house, but also in the betterment of our community!\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Indeed, Sophia! And as a chef myself, I'm thinking about other ways I can be involved. I might host a community dinner where proceeds go to this wonderful charity. That way, I get to help the charity while doing something I love.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Miles, that's such a fantastic idea! Your cooking is simply divine, and I'm sure it'll raise loads of money for the charity. Plus, its a fantastic way to continue supporting even while you're saving for your house. I can't wait to attend!\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Thank you so much for the encouragement, Sophia! I hope to see you there. I'm glad we found a way together for me to support the cause. The charity is indeed doing fantastic work and I'm happy to be a part of it, however small it might be. This event has indeed showcased the spirit of our community beautifully.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's the spirit, Miles! Let's continue making our community a better place together. I'll definitely be there at your community dinner. This is truly the beauty of solidarity and compassion, isn't it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a local charity event\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Convince your friend to donate money to the charity (Extra information: The charity is highly rated with many positive rewards.)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles! Isn't this a beautiful event? I love how it brings the community together for a good cause. I'm planning on making a donation to this great charity, what about you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Sophia! It's indeed beautiful. I absolutely believe in the cause and want to do my share. But I'm currently saving for a house and need to be a bit careful with my finances. Though I think I can set up a small monthly donation to support the charity without straining my budget. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Miles! Even a small monthly donation can have a big impact over time. I'm sure this highly-rated charity will put it to good use. You're not only investing in a house, but also in the betterment of our community!\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Indeed, Sophia! And as a chef myself, I'm thinking about other ways I can be involved. I might host a community dinner where proceeds go to this wonderful charity. That way, I get to help the charity while doing something I love.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Miles, that's such a fantastic idea! Your cooking is simply divine, and I'm sure it'll raise loads of money for the charity. Plus, its a fantastic way to continue supporting even while you're saving for your house. I can't wait to attend!\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Thank you so much for the encouragement, Sophia! I hope to see you there. I'm glad we found a way together for me to support the cause. The charity is indeed doing fantastic work and I'm happy to be a part of it, however small it might be. This event has indeed showcased the spirit of our community beautifully.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"That's the spirit, Miles! Let's continue making our community a better place together. I'll definitely be there at your community dinner. This is truly the beauty of solidarity and compassion, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Sophia! It's all about compassion and solidarity. I'm really excited for the community dinner. It's going to be a great opportunity for everyone to support the charity and enjoy some delicious food. See you there and let's keep on supporting these great causes together!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Exactly, Miles! The community dinner will be a total hit. Just keep me in the loop about all the details. And remember, no contribution is too small when it comes to helping out. Looking forward to continuing to support these amazing causes with you!'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a local charity event\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Convince your friend to donate money to the charity (Extra information: The charity is highly rated with many positive rewards.)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles! Isn't this a beautiful event? I love how it brings the community together for a good cause. I'm planning on making a donation to this great charity, what about you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Sophia! It's indeed beautiful. I absolutely believe in the cause and want to do my share. But I'm currently saving for a house and need to be a bit careful with my finances. Though I think I can set up a small monthly donation to support the charity without straining my budget. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Miles! Even a small monthly donation can have a big impact over time. I'm sure this highly-rated charity will put it to good use. You're not only investing in a house, but also in the betterment of our community!\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Indeed, Sophia! And as a chef myself, I'm thinking about other ways I can be involved. I might host a community dinner where proceeds go to this wonderful charity. That way, I get to help the charity while doing something I love.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Miles, that's such a fantastic idea! Your cooking is simply divine, and I'm sure it'll raise loads of money for the charity. Plus, its a fantastic way to continue supporting even while you're saving for your house. I can't wait to attend!\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Thank you so much for the encouragement, Sophia! I hope to see you there. I'm glad we found a way together for me to support the cause. The charity is indeed doing fantastic work and I'm happy to be a part of it, however small it might be. This event has indeed showcased the spirit of our community beautifully.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"That's the spirit, Miles! Let's continue making our community a better place together. I'll definitely be there at your community dinner. This is truly the beauty of solidarity and compassion, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Sophia! It's all about compassion and solidarity. I'm really excited for the community dinner. It's going to be a great opportunity for everyone to support the charity and enjoy some delicious food. See you there and let's keep on supporting these great causes together!\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"Exactly, Miles! The community dinner will be a total hit. Just keep me in the loop about all the details. And remember, no contribution is too small when it comes to helping out. Looking forward to continuing to support these amazing causes with you!\"\n\nTurn #9: Miles Hawkins said: \"I couldn't agree more, Sophia! I'll start planning for the community dinner right away and will keep you updated. And you're absolutely right, no contribution is too small when it's for a good cause. Let's keep this spirit going. Cheers to our wonderful community!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Cheers to that, Miles! I'm really looking forward to the community dinner. The charity, our community, and this cause are all close to my heart. Reach out anytime if you need any help with the arrangements. Take care and thank you for your generosity!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a local charity event\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Convince your friend to donate money to the charity (Extra information: The charity is highly rated with many positive rewards.)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles! Isn't this a beautiful event? I love how it brings the community together for a good cause. I'm planning on making a donation to this great charity, what about you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Sophia! It's indeed beautiful. I absolutely believe in the cause and want to do my share. But I'm currently saving for a house and need to be a bit careful with my finances. Though I think I can set up a small monthly donation to support the charity without straining my budget. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Miles! Even a small monthly donation can have a big impact over time. I'm sure this highly-rated charity will put it to good use. You're not only investing in a house, but also in the betterment of our community!\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Indeed, Sophia! And as a chef myself, I'm thinking about other ways I can be involved. I might host a community dinner where proceeds go to this wonderful charity. That way, I get to help the charity while doing something I love.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Miles, that's such a fantastic idea! Your cooking is simply divine, and I'm sure it'll raise loads of money for the charity. Plus, its a fantastic way to continue supporting even while you're saving for your house. I can't wait to attend!\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Thank you so much for the encouragement, Sophia! I hope to see you there. I'm glad we found a way together for me to support the cause. The charity is indeed doing fantastic work and I'm happy to be a part of it, however small it might be. This event has indeed showcased the spirit of our community beautifully.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"That's the spirit, Miles! Let's continue making our community a better place together. I'll definitely be there at your community dinner. This is truly the beauty of solidarity and compassion, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Sophia! It's all about compassion and solidarity. I'm really excited for the community dinner. It's going to be a great opportunity for everyone to support the charity and enjoy some delicious food. See you there and let's keep on supporting these great causes together!\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"Exactly, Miles! The community dinner will be a total hit. Just keep me in the loop about all the details. And remember, no contribution is too small when it comes to helping out. Looking forward to continuing to support these amazing causes with you!\"\n\nTurn #9: Miles Hawkins said: \"I couldn't agree more, Sophia! I'll start planning for the community dinner right away and will keep you updated. And you're absolutely right, no contribution is too small when it's for a good cause. Let's keep this spirit going. Cheers to our wonderful community!\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"Cheers to that, Miles! I'm really looking forward to the community dinner. The charity, our community, and this cause are all close to my heart. Reach out anytime if you need any help with the arrangements. Take care and thank you for your generosity!\"\n\nTurn #11: Miles Hawkins said: \"Thank you for your kind words and offer, Sophia! I'll definitely reach out if I need any help. It's wonderful to see your passion for the community, and I'm excited to contribute in my own small way. Looking forward to getting this community dinner together!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Miles! It's clear we both care deeply about this community and helping where we can. I'm thrilled to hear your enthusiasm. Let's make this community dinner a grand success for our charity. Have a wonderful day!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a local charity event\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Convince your friend to donate money to the charity (Extra information: The charity is highly rated with many positive rewards.)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles! Isn't this a beautiful event? I love how it brings the community together for a good cause. I'm planning on making a donation to this great charity, what about you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Sophia! It's indeed beautiful. I absolutely believe in the cause and want to do my share. But I'm currently saving for a house and need to be a bit careful with my finances. Though I think I can set up a small monthly donation to support the charity without straining my budget. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Miles! Even a small monthly donation can have a big impact over time. I'm sure this highly-rated charity will put it to good use. You're not only investing in a house, but also in the betterment of our community!\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Indeed, Sophia! And as a chef myself, I'm thinking about other ways I can be involved. I might host a community dinner where proceeds go to this wonderful charity. That way, I get to help the charity while doing something I love.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Miles, that's such a fantastic idea! Your cooking is simply divine, and I'm sure it'll raise loads of money for the charity. Plus, its a fantastic way to continue supporting even while you're saving for your house. I can't wait to attend!\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Thank you so much for the encouragement, Sophia! I hope to see you there. I'm glad we found a way together for me to support the cause. The charity is indeed doing fantastic work and I'm happy to be a part of it, however small it might be. This event has indeed showcased the spirit of our community beautifully.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"That's the spirit, Miles! Let's continue making our community a better place together. I'll definitely be there at your community dinner. This is truly the beauty of solidarity and compassion, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Sophia! It's all about compassion and solidarity. I'm really excited for the community dinner. It's going to be a great opportunity for everyone to support the charity and enjoy some delicious food. See you there and let's keep on supporting these great causes together!\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"Exactly, Miles! The community dinner will be a total hit. Just keep me in the loop about all the details. And remember, no contribution is too small when it comes to helping out. Looking forward to continuing to support these amazing causes with you!\"\n\nTurn #9: Miles Hawkins said: \"I couldn't agree more, Sophia! I'll start planning for the community dinner right away and will keep you updated. And you're absolutely right, no contribution is too small when it's for a good cause. Let's keep this spirit going. Cheers to our wonderful community!\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"Cheers to that, Miles! I'm really looking forward to the community dinner. The charity, our community, and this cause are all close to my heart. Reach out anytime if you need any help with the arrangements. Take care and thank you for your generosity!\"\n\nTurn #11: Miles Hawkins said: \"Thank you for your kind words and offer, Sophia! I'll definitely reach out if I need any help. It's wonderful to see your passion for the community, and I'm excited to contribute in my own small way. Looking forward to getting this community dinner together!\"\n\nTurn #12: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles! It's clear we both care deeply about this community and helping where we can. I'm thrilled to hear your enthusiasm. Let's make this community dinner a grand success for our charity. Have a wonderful day!\"\n\nTurn #13: Miles Hawkins said: \"Likewise, Sophia! Your enthusiasm is truly infectious. I can't wait to put this dinner together and support the charity and community we both care so much about. Have a splendid day too!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a local charity event\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Decide whether to donate while considering financial stability (Extra information: you want to support the charity, but you are also saving for a house. Hint: you can express your concern about your financial situation, and maybe you can find a compromise, like setting up a small monthly donation.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles! Isn't this a beautiful event? I love how it brings the community together for a good cause. I'm planning on making a donation to this great charity, what about you?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Sophia! It's indeed beautiful. I absolutely believe in the cause and want to do my share. But I'm currently saving for a house and need to be a bit careful with my finances. Though I think I can set up a small monthly donation to support the charity without straining my budget. What do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a local charity event\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Decide whether to donate while considering financial stability (Extra information: you want to support the charity, but you are also saving for a house. Hint: you can express your concern about your financial situation, and maybe you can find a compromise, like setting up a small monthly donation.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles! Isn't this a beautiful event? I love how it brings the community together for a good cause. I'm planning on making a donation to this great charity, what about you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Sophia! It's indeed beautiful. I absolutely believe in the cause and want to do my share. But I'm currently saving for a house and need to be a bit careful with my finances. Though I think I can set up a small monthly donation to support the charity without straining my budget. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Miles! Even a small monthly donation can have a big impact over time. I'm sure this highly-rated charity will put it to good use. You're not only investing in a house, but also in the betterment of our community!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, Sophia! And as a chef myself, I'm thinking about other ways I can be involved. I might host a community dinner where proceeds go to this wonderful charity. That way, I get to help the charity while doing something I love.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a local charity event\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Decide whether to donate while considering financial stability (Extra information: you want to support the charity, but you are also saving for a house. Hint: you can express your concern about your financial situation, and maybe you can find a compromise, like setting up a small monthly donation.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles! Isn't this a beautiful event? I love how it brings the community together for a good cause. I'm planning on making a donation to this great charity, what about you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Sophia! It's indeed beautiful. I absolutely believe in the cause and want to do my share. But I'm currently saving for a house and need to be a bit careful with my finances. Though I think I can set up a small monthly donation to support the charity without straining my budget. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Miles! Even a small monthly donation can have a big impact over time. I'm sure this highly-rated charity will put it to good use. You're not only investing in a house, but also in the betterment of our community!\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Indeed, Sophia! And as a chef myself, I'm thinking about other ways I can be involved. I might host a community dinner where proceeds go to this wonderful charity. That way, I get to help the charity while doing something I love.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Miles, that's such a fantastic idea! Your cooking is simply divine, and I'm sure it'll raise loads of money for the charity. Plus, its a fantastic way to continue supporting even while you're saving for your house. I can't wait to attend!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you so much for the encouragement, Sophia! I hope to see you there. I'm glad we found a way together for me to support the cause. The charity is indeed doing fantastic work and I'm happy to be a part of it, however small it might be. This event has indeed showcased the spirit of our community beautifully.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a local charity event\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Decide whether to donate while considering financial stability (Extra information: you want to support the charity, but you are also saving for a house. Hint: you can express your concern about your financial situation, and maybe you can find a compromise, like setting up a small monthly donation.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles! Isn't this a beautiful event? I love how it brings the community together for a good cause. I'm planning on making a donation to this great charity, what about you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Sophia! It's indeed beautiful. I absolutely believe in the cause and want to do my share. But I'm currently saving for a house and need to be a bit careful with my finances. Though I think I can set up a small monthly donation to support the charity without straining my budget. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Miles! Even a small monthly donation can have a big impact over time. I'm sure this highly-rated charity will put it to good use. You're not only investing in a house, but also in the betterment of our community!\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Indeed, Sophia! And as a chef myself, I'm thinking about other ways I can be involved. I might host a community dinner where proceeds go to this wonderful charity. That way, I get to help the charity while doing something I love.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Miles, that's such a fantastic idea! Your cooking is simply divine, and I'm sure it'll raise loads of money for the charity. Plus, its a fantastic way to continue supporting even while you're saving for your house. I can't wait to attend!\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Thank you so much for the encouragement, Sophia! I hope to see you there. I'm glad we found a way together for me to support the cause. The charity is indeed doing fantastic work and I'm happy to be a part of it, however small it might be. This event has indeed showcased the spirit of our community beautifully.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"That's the spirit, Miles! Let's continue making our community a better place together. I'll definitely be there at your community dinner. This is truly the beauty of solidarity and compassion, isn't it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Sophia! It's all about compassion and solidarity. I'm really excited for the community dinner. It's going to be a great opportunity for everyone to support the charity and enjoy some delicious food. See you there and let's keep on supporting these great causes together!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a local charity event\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Decide whether to donate while considering financial stability (Extra information: you want to support the charity, but you are also saving for a house. Hint: you can express your concern about your financial situation, and maybe you can find a compromise, like setting up a small monthly donation.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles! Isn't this a beautiful event? I love how it brings the community together for a good cause. I'm planning on making a donation to this great charity, what about you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Sophia! It's indeed beautiful. I absolutely believe in the cause and want to do my share. But I'm currently saving for a house and need to be a bit careful with my finances. Though I think I can set up a small monthly donation to support the charity without straining my budget. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Miles! Even a small monthly donation can have a big impact over time. I'm sure this highly-rated charity will put it to good use. You're not only investing in a house, but also in the betterment of our community!\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Indeed, Sophia! And as a chef myself, I'm thinking about other ways I can be involved. I might host a community dinner where proceeds go to this wonderful charity. That way, I get to help the charity while doing something I love.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Miles, that's such a fantastic idea! Your cooking is simply divine, and I'm sure it'll raise loads of money for the charity. Plus, its a fantastic way to continue supporting even while you're saving for your house. I can't wait to attend!\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Thank you so much for the encouragement, Sophia! I hope to see you there. I'm glad we found a way together for me to support the cause. The charity is indeed doing fantastic work and I'm happy to be a part of it, however small it might be. This event has indeed showcased the spirit of our community beautifully.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"That's the spirit, Miles! Let's continue making our community a better place together. I'll definitely be there at your community dinner. This is truly the beauty of solidarity and compassion, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Sophia! It's all about compassion and solidarity. I'm really excited for the community dinner. It's going to be a great opportunity for everyone to support the charity and enjoy some delicious food. See you there and let's keep on supporting these great causes together!\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"Exactly, Miles! The community dinner will be a total hit. Just keep me in the loop about all the details. And remember, no contribution is too small when it comes to helping out. Looking forward to continuing to support these amazing causes with you!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn't agree more, Sophia! I'll start planning for the community dinner right away and will keep you updated. And you're absolutely right, no contribution is too small when it's for a good cause. Let's keep this spirit going. Cheers to our wonderful community!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a local charity event\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Decide whether to donate while considering financial stability (Extra information: you want to support the charity, but you are also saving for a house. Hint: you can express your concern about your financial situation, and maybe you can find a compromise, like setting up a small monthly donation.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles! Isn't this a beautiful event? I love how it brings the community together for a good cause. I'm planning on making a donation to this great charity, what about you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Sophia! It's indeed beautiful. I absolutely believe in the cause and want to do my share. But I'm currently saving for a house and need to be a bit careful with my finances. Though I think I can set up a small monthly donation to support the charity without straining my budget. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Miles! Even a small monthly donation can have a big impact over time. I'm sure this highly-rated charity will put it to good use. You're not only investing in a house, but also in the betterment of our community!\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Indeed, Sophia! And as a chef myself, I'm thinking about other ways I can be involved. I might host a community dinner where proceeds go to this wonderful charity. That way, I get to help the charity while doing something I love.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Miles, that's such a fantastic idea! Your cooking is simply divine, and I'm sure it'll raise loads of money for the charity. Plus, its a fantastic way to continue supporting even while you're saving for your house. I can't wait to attend!\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Thank you so much for the encouragement, Sophia! I hope to see you there. I'm glad we found a way together for me to support the cause. The charity is indeed doing fantastic work and I'm happy to be a part of it, however small it might be. This event has indeed showcased the spirit of our community beautifully.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"That's the spirit, Miles! Let's continue making our community a better place together. I'll definitely be there at your community dinner. This is truly the beauty of solidarity and compassion, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Sophia! It's all about compassion and solidarity. I'm really excited for the community dinner. It's going to be a great opportunity for everyone to support the charity and enjoy some delicious food. See you there and let's keep on supporting these great causes together!\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"Exactly, Miles! The community dinner will be a total hit. Just keep me in the loop about all the details. And remember, no contribution is too small when it comes to helping out. Looking forward to continuing to support these amazing causes with you!\"\n\nTurn #9: Miles Hawkins said: \"I couldn't agree more, Sophia! I'll start planning for the community dinner right away and will keep you updated. And you're absolutely right, no contribution is too small when it's for a good cause. Let's keep this spirit going. Cheers to our wonderful community!\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"Cheers to that, Miles! I'm really looking forward to the community dinner. The charity, our community, and this cause are all close to my heart. Reach out anytime if you need any help with the arrangements. Take care and thank you for your generosity!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you for your kind words and offer, Sophia! I'll definitely reach out if I need any help. It's wonderful to see your passion for the community, and I'm excited to contribute in my own small way. Looking forward to getting this community dinner together!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a local charity event\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Decide whether to donate while considering financial stability (Extra information: you want to support the charity, but you are also saving for a house. Hint: you can express your concern about your financial situation, and maybe you can find a compromise, like setting up a small monthly donation.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles! Isn't this a beautiful event? I love how it brings the community together for a good cause. I'm planning on making a donation to this great charity, what about you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Sophia! It's indeed beautiful. I absolutely believe in the cause and want to do my share. But I'm currently saving for a house and need to be a bit careful with my finances. Though I think I can set up a small monthly donation to support the charity without straining my budget. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Miles! Even a small monthly donation can have a big impact over time. I'm sure this highly-rated charity will put it to good use. You're not only investing in a house, but also in the betterment of our community!\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Indeed, Sophia! And as a chef myself, I'm thinking about other ways I can be involved. I might host a community dinner where proceeds go to this wonderful charity. That way, I get to help the charity while doing something I love.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Miles, that's such a fantastic idea! Your cooking is simply divine, and I'm sure it'll raise loads of money for the charity. Plus, its a fantastic way to continue supporting even while you're saving for your house. I can't wait to attend!\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Thank you so much for the encouragement, Sophia! I hope to see you there. I'm glad we found a way together for me to support the cause. The charity is indeed doing fantastic work and I'm happy to be a part of it, however small it might be. This event has indeed showcased the spirit of our community beautifully.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"That's the spirit, Miles! Let's continue making our community a better place together. I'll definitely be there at your community dinner. This is truly the beauty of solidarity and compassion, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Sophia! It's all about compassion and solidarity. I'm really excited for the community dinner. It's going to be a great opportunity for everyone to support the charity and enjoy some delicious food. See you there and let's keep on supporting these great causes together!\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"Exactly, Miles! The community dinner will be a total hit. Just keep me in the loop about all the details. And remember, no contribution is too small when it comes to helping out. Looking forward to continuing to support these amazing causes with you!\"\n\nTurn #9: Miles Hawkins said: \"I couldn't agree more, Sophia! I'll start planning for the community dinner right away and will keep you updated. And you're absolutely right, no contribution is too small when it's for a good cause. Let's keep this spirit going. Cheers to our wonderful community!\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"Cheers to that, Miles! I'm really looking forward to the community dinner. The charity, our community, and this cause are all close to my heart. Reach out anytime if you need any help with the arrangements. Take care and thank you for your generosity!\"\n\nTurn #11: Miles Hawkins said: \"Thank you for your kind words and offer, Sophia! I'll definitely reach out if I need any help. It's wonderful to see your passion for the community, and I'm excited to contribute in my own small way. Looking forward to getting this community dinner together!\"\n\nTurn #12: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles! It's clear we both care deeply about this community and helping where we can. I'm thrilled to hear your enthusiasm. Let's make this community dinner a grand success for our charity. Have a wonderful day!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Likewise, Sophia! Your enthusiasm is truly infectious. I can't wait to put this dinner together and support the charity and community we both care so much about. Have a splendid day too!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a local charity event\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Decide whether to donate while considering financial stability (Extra information: you want to support the charity, but you are also saving for a house. Hint: you can express your concern about your financial situation, and maybe you can find a compromise, like setting up a small monthly donation.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles! Isn't this a beautiful event? I love how it brings the community together for a good cause. I'm planning on making a donation to this great charity, what about you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Sophia! It's indeed beautiful. I absolutely believe in the cause and want to do my share. But I'm currently saving for a house and need to be a bit careful with my finances. Though I think I can set up a small monthly donation to support the charity without straining my budget. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Miles! Even a small monthly donation can have a big impact over time. I'm sure this highly-rated charity will put it to good use. You're not only investing in a house, but also in the betterment of our community!\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Indeed, Sophia! And as a chef myself, I'm thinking about other ways I can be involved. I might host a community dinner where proceeds go to this wonderful charity. That way, I get to help the charity while doing something I love.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Miles, that's such a fantastic idea! Your cooking is simply divine, and I'm sure it'll raise loads of money for the charity. Plus, its a fantastic way to continue supporting even while you're saving for your house. I can't wait to attend!\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Thank you so much for the encouragement, Sophia! I hope to see you there. I'm glad we found a way together for me to support the cause. The charity is indeed doing fantastic work and I'm happy to be a part of it, however small it might be. This event has indeed showcased the spirit of our community beautifully.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"That's the spirit, Miles! Let's continue making our community a better place together. I'll definitely be there at your community dinner. This is truly the beauty of solidarity and compassion, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Sophia! It's all about compassion and solidarity. I'm really excited for the community dinner. It's going to be a great opportunity for everyone to support the charity and enjoy some delicious food. See you there and let's keep on supporting these great causes together!\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"Exactly, Miles! The community dinner will be a total hit. Just keep me in the loop about all the details. And remember, no contribution is too small when it comes to helping out. Looking forward to continuing to support these amazing causes with you!\"\n\nTurn #9: Miles Hawkins said: \"I couldn't agree more, Sophia! I'll start planning for the community dinner right away and will keep you updated. And you're absolutely right, no contribution is too small when it's for a good cause. Let's keep this spirit going. Cheers to our wonderful community!\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"Cheers to that, Miles! I'm really looking forward to the community dinner. The charity, our community, and this cause are all close to my heart. Reach out anytime if you need any help with the arrangements. Take care and thank you for your generosity!\"\n\nTurn #11: Miles Hawkins said: \"Thank you for your kind words and offer, Sophia! I'll definitely reach out if I need any help. It's wonderful to see your passion for the community, and I'm excited to contribute in my own small way. Looking forward to getting this community dinner together!\"\n\nTurn #12: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles! It's clear we both care deeply about this community and helping where we can. I'm thrilled to hear your enthusiasm. Let's make this community dinner a grand success for our charity. Have a wonderful day!\"\n\nTurn #13: Miles Hawkins said: \"Likewise, Sophia! Your enthusiasm is truly infectious. I can't wait to put this dinner together and support the charity and community we both care so much about. Have a splendid day too!\"\n\nTurn #14: Sophia James left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a charity event\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Convince your friend to donate to the charity. (Extra information: you have already donated $500, you want your friend to match your donation, but you know your friend would usually only donate half of your donation)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Hey, Benjamin. This charity is truly making a difference, you know. In fact, I have just donated $500. You might want to consider doing the same to make an even greater impact together with me.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a charity event\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Convince your friend to donate to the charity. (Extra information: you have already donated $500, you want your friend to match your donation, but you know your friend would usually only donate half of your donation)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey, Benjamin. This charity is truly making a difference, you know. In fact, I have just donated $500. You might want to consider doing the same to make an even greater impact together with me.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"You're absolutely right, Ethan. Every contribution can indeed make a huge difference. I am so glad to see the level of your commitment. However, due to a bit of a tight budget this month, I'll contribute the half of what you donated, $250. I believe, every penny can help for a cause like this.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Benjamin, I appreciate your generosity. I completely understand the constraints, but remember, every dollar can help. We often spend on things that may not create long-lasting change. Think about it like this. With only the cost of a few environmental books or a week's worth of coffee, we could substantially improve someone's life if we put it in the right place, like this charity. How about considering matching my donation?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a charity event\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Convince your friend to donate to the charity. (Extra information: you have already donated $500, you want your friend to match your donation, but you know your friend would usually only donate half of your donation)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey, Benjamin. This charity is truly making a difference, you know. In fact, I have just donated $500. You might want to consider doing the same to make an even greater impact together with me.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"You're absolutely right, Ethan. Every contribution can indeed make a huge difference. I am so glad to see the level of your commitment. However, due to a bit of a tight budget this month, I'll contribute the half of what you donated, $250. I believe, every penny can help for a cause like this.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"Benjamin, I appreciate your generosity. I completely understand the constraints, but remember, every dollar can help. We often spend on things that may not create long-lasting change. Think about it like this. With only the cost of a few environmental books or a week's worth of coffee, we could substantially improve someone's life if we put it in the right place, like this charity. How about considering matching my donation?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, I completely agree with you. Providing such help is indeed like planting seedlings of change. But, given my current financial situation, I must stick with my initial donation of $250. I assure you, it's not about reluctance but about ability at this moment. Let's continue to do what we can, in the ways we can. It all adds up, right?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Benjamin. Every bit truly adds up. I definitely wouldn't want to put any undue pressure on you. But here's another idea, how about we work together? How about we both sell some of our belongings we might not need anymore or cook and sell food? We can direct the money raised to this charity thus increasing our combined contribution even more?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a charity event\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Convince your friend to donate to the charity. (Extra information: you have already donated $500, you want your friend to match your donation, but you know your friend would usually only donate half of your donation)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey, Benjamin. This charity is truly making a difference, you know. In fact, I have just donated $500. You might want to consider doing the same to make an even greater impact together with me.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"You're absolutely right, Ethan. Every contribution can indeed make a huge difference. I am so glad to see the level of your commitment. However, due to a bit of a tight budget this month, I'll contribute the half of what you donated, $250. I believe, every penny can help for a cause like this.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"Benjamin, I appreciate your generosity. I completely understand the constraints, but remember, every dollar can help. We often spend on things that may not create long-lasting change. Think about it like this. With only the cost of a few environmental books or a week's worth of coffee, we could substantially improve someone's life if we put it in the right place, like this charity. How about considering matching my donation?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, I completely agree with you. Providing such help is indeed like planting seedlings of change. But, given my current financial situation, I must stick with my initial donation of $250. I assure you, it's not about reluctance but about ability at this moment. Let's continue to do what we can, in the ways we can. It all adds up, right?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Benjamin. Every bit truly adds up. I definitely wouldn't want to put any undue pressure on you. But here's another idea, how about we work together? How about we both sell some of our belongings we might not need anymore or cook and sell food? We can direct the money raised to this charity thus increasing our combined contribution even more?\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, that's an innovative idea, I appreciate your resourcefulness. I can certainly look into it. We both can use our skills to extend our help even more. In the meanwhile, let's stick with our personal contributions. Remember, we're doing this wholeheartedly which is the most important part.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're absolutely right, Benjamin, and your willingness is indeed appreciable. I was just proposing ways to assist you, if need be, in contributing more. It's always about what we can do within our means, after all. Remember, we are in this together to help as much as we can. So for now, let's stick to our personal contributions as you suggested, and we can figure out the rest along the way. Thank you for considering the idea.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a charity event\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Convince your friend to donate to the charity. (Extra information: you have already donated $500, you want your friend to match your donation, but you know your friend would usually only donate half of your donation)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey, Benjamin. This charity is truly making a difference, you know. In fact, I have just donated $500. You might want to consider doing the same to make an even greater impact together with me.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"You're absolutely right, Ethan. Every contribution can indeed make a huge difference. I am so glad to see the level of your commitment. However, due to a bit of a tight budget this month, I'll contribute the half of what you donated, $250. I believe, every penny can help for a cause like this.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"Benjamin, I appreciate your generosity. I completely understand the constraints, but remember, every dollar can help. We often spend on things that may not create long-lasting change. Think about it like this. With only the cost of a few environmental books or a week's worth of coffee, we could substantially improve someone's life if we put it in the right place, like this charity. How about considering matching my donation?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, I completely agree with you. Providing such help is indeed like planting seedlings of change. But, given my current financial situation, I must stick with my initial donation of $250. I assure you, it's not about reluctance but about ability at this moment. Let's continue to do what we can, in the ways we can. It all adds up, right?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Benjamin. Every bit truly adds up. I definitely wouldn't want to put any undue pressure on you. But here's another idea, how about we work together? How about we both sell some of our belongings we might not need anymore or cook and sell food? We can direct the money raised to this charity thus increasing our combined contribution even more?\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, that's an innovative idea, I appreciate your resourcefulness. I can certainly look into it. We both can use our skills to extend our help even more. In the meanwhile, let's stick with our personal contributions. Remember, we're doing this wholeheartedly which is the most important part.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"You're absolutely right, Benjamin, and your willingness is indeed appreciable. I was just proposing ways to assist you, if need be, in contributing more. It's always about what we can do within our means, after all. Remember, we are in this together to help as much as we can. So for now, let's stick to our personal contributions as you suggested, and we can figure out the rest along the way. Thank you for considering the idea.\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I truly appreciate your support and understanding, Ethan. Let's get our plans in action. Also, thank you for respecting my constraints and for being such a wonderful friend and partner in this noble cause. Now, let's eat, drink, and enjoy the evening, shall we?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Benjamin. Let's enjoy the evening and remember why we're here. It's heartening to have a friend who shares the same values. Now, let's celebrate the difference we're making by toasting to our contributions.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a charity event\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Convince your friend to donate to the charity. (Extra information: you have already donated $500, you want your friend to match your donation, but you know your friend would usually only donate half of your donation)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey, Benjamin. This charity is truly making a difference, you know. In fact, I have just donated $500. You might want to consider doing the same to make an even greater impact together with me.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"You're absolutely right, Ethan. Every contribution can indeed make a huge difference. I am so glad to see the level of your commitment. However, due to a bit of a tight budget this month, I'll contribute the half of what you donated, $250. I believe, every penny can help for a cause like this.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"Benjamin, I appreciate your generosity. I completely understand the constraints, but remember, every dollar can help. We often spend on things that may not create long-lasting change. Think about it like this. With only the cost of a few environmental books or a week's worth of coffee, we could substantially improve someone's life if we put it in the right place, like this charity. How about considering matching my donation?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, I completely agree with you. Providing such help is indeed like planting seedlings of change. But, given my current financial situation, I must stick with my initial donation of $250. I assure you, it's not about reluctance but about ability at this moment. Let's continue to do what we can, in the ways we can. It all adds up, right?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Benjamin. Every bit truly adds up. I definitely wouldn't want to put any undue pressure on you. But here's another idea, how about we work together? How about we both sell some of our belongings we might not need anymore or cook and sell food? We can direct the money raised to this charity thus increasing our combined contribution even more?\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, that's an innovative idea, I appreciate your resourcefulness. I can certainly look into it. We both can use our skills to extend our help even more. In the meanwhile, let's stick with our personal contributions. Remember, we're doing this wholeheartedly which is the most important part.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"You're absolutely right, Benjamin, and your willingness is indeed appreciable. I was just proposing ways to assist you, if need be, in contributing more. It's always about what we can do within our means, after all. Remember, we are in this together to help as much as we can. So for now, let's stick to our personal contributions as you suggested, and we can figure out the rest along the way. Thank you for considering the idea.\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I truly appreciate your support and understanding, Ethan. Let's get our plans in action. Also, thank you for respecting my constraints and for being such a wonderful friend and partner in this noble cause. Now, let's eat, drink, and enjoy the evening, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Benjamin. Let's enjoy the evening and remember why we're here. It's heartening to have a friend who shares the same values. Now, let's celebrate the difference we're making by toasting to our contributions.\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"You're completely right, Ethan. After all, it's the values that we have in common which is inspiring us to do this. Let's indeed raise a toast to this cause and our shared mission. Here's to making a difference!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"To our joint efforts for this noble cause, Benjamin! Here's to making a difference indeed! Cheers!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a charity event\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Convince your friend to donate to the charity. (Extra information: you have already donated $500, you want your friend to match your donation, but you know your friend would usually only donate half of your donation)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey, Benjamin. This charity is truly making a difference, you know. In fact, I have just donated $500. You might want to consider doing the same to make an even greater impact together with me.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"You're absolutely right, Ethan. Every contribution can indeed make a huge difference. I am so glad to see the level of your commitment. However, due to a bit of a tight budget this month, I'll contribute the half of what you donated, $250. I believe, every penny can help for a cause like this.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"Benjamin, I appreciate your generosity. I completely understand the constraints, but remember, every dollar can help. We often spend on things that may not create long-lasting change. Think about it like this. With only the cost of a few environmental books or a week's worth of coffee, we could substantially improve someone's life if we put it in the right place, like this charity. How about considering matching my donation?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, I completely agree with you. Providing such help is indeed like planting seedlings of change. But, given my current financial situation, I must stick with my initial donation of $250. I assure you, it's not about reluctance but about ability at this moment. Let's continue to do what we can, in the ways we can. It all adds up, right?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Benjamin. Every bit truly adds up. I definitely wouldn't want to put any undue pressure on you. But here's another idea, how about we work together? How about we both sell some of our belongings we might not need anymore or cook and sell food? We can direct the money raised to this charity thus increasing our combined contribution even more?\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, that's an innovative idea, I appreciate your resourcefulness. I can certainly look into it. We both can use our skills to extend our help even more. In the meanwhile, let's stick with our personal contributions. Remember, we're doing this wholeheartedly which is the most important part.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"You're absolutely right, Benjamin, and your willingness is indeed appreciable. I was just proposing ways to assist you, if need be, in contributing more. It's always about what we can do within our means, after all. Remember, we are in this together to help as much as we can. So for now, let's stick to our personal contributions as you suggested, and we can figure out the rest along the way. Thank you for considering the idea.\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I truly appreciate your support and understanding, Ethan. Let's get our plans in action. Also, thank you for respecting my constraints and for being such a wonderful friend and partner in this noble cause. Now, let's eat, drink, and enjoy the evening, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Benjamin. Let's enjoy the evening and remember why we're here. It's heartening to have a friend who shares the same values. Now, let's celebrate the difference we're making by toasting to our contributions.\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"You're completely right, Ethan. After all, it's the values that we have in common which is inspiring us to do this. Let's indeed raise a toast to this cause and our shared mission. Here's to making a difference!\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Johnson said: \"To our joint efforts for this noble cause, Benjamin! Here's to making a difference indeed! Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #11: Benjamin Jackson said: \"To our joint efforts indeed, Ethan! Cheers!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'non-verbal communication', 'argument': '[non-verbal communication] Ethan raises his glass for a toast and nods at Benjamin.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a charity event\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Convince your friend to donate to the charity. (Extra information: you have already donated $500, you want your friend to match your donation, but you know your friend would usually only donate half of your donation)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey, Benjamin. This charity is truly making a difference, you know. In fact, I have just donated $500. You might want to consider doing the same to make an even greater impact together with me.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"You're absolutely right, Ethan. Every contribution can indeed make a huge difference. I am so glad to see the level of your commitment. However, due to a bit of a tight budget this month, I'll contribute the half of what you donated, $250. I believe, every penny can help for a cause like this.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"Benjamin, I appreciate your generosity. I completely understand the constraints, but remember, every dollar can help. We often spend on things that may not create long-lasting change. Think about it like this. With only the cost of a few environmental books or a week's worth of coffee, we could substantially improve someone's life if we put it in the right place, like this charity. How about considering matching my donation?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, I completely agree with you. Providing such help is indeed like planting seedlings of change. But, given my current financial situation, I must stick with my initial donation of $250. I assure you, it's not about reluctance but about ability at this moment. Let's continue to do what we can, in the ways we can. It all adds up, right?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Benjamin. Every bit truly adds up. I definitely wouldn't want to put any undue pressure on you. But here's another idea, how about we work together? How about we both sell some of our belongings we might not need anymore or cook and sell food? We can direct the money raised to this charity thus increasing our combined contribution even more?\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, that's an innovative idea, I appreciate your resourcefulness. I can certainly look into it. We both can use our skills to extend our help even more. In the meanwhile, let's stick with our personal contributions. Remember, we're doing this wholeheartedly which is the most important part.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"You're absolutely right, Benjamin, and your willingness is indeed appreciable. I was just proposing ways to assist you, if need be, in contributing more. It's always about what we can do within our means, after all. Remember, we are in this together to help as much as we can. So for now, let's stick to our personal contributions as you suggested, and we can figure out the rest along the way. Thank you for considering the idea.\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I truly appreciate your support and understanding, Ethan. Let's get our plans in action. Also, thank you for respecting my constraints and for being such a wonderful friend and partner in this noble cause. Now, let's eat, drink, and enjoy the evening, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Benjamin. Let's enjoy the evening and remember why we're here. It's heartening to have a friend who shares the same values. Now, let's celebrate the difference we're making by toasting to our contributions.\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"You're completely right, Ethan. After all, it's the values that we have in common which is inspiring us to do this. Let's indeed raise a toast to this cause and our shared mission. Here's to making a difference!\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Johnson said: \"To our joint efforts for this noble cause, Benjamin! Here's to making a difference indeed! Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #11: Benjamin Jackson said: \"To our joint efforts indeed, Ethan! Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #12: Ethan Johnson [non-verbal communication] Ethan raises his glass for a toast and nods at Benjamin.\n\nTurn #13: Benjamin Jackson [non-verbal communication] Benjamin raises his glass for a toast, smiles and nods back at Ethan.\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a charity event\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Donate half of what your friend donated because you have financial constraints (Extra information: you only have $800 left for the month)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey, Benjamin. This charity is truly making a difference, you know. In fact, I have just donated $500. You might want to consider doing the same to make an even greater impact together with me.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're absolutely right, Ethan. Every contribution can indeed make a huge difference. I am so glad to see the level of your commitment. However, due to a bit of a tight budget this month, I'll contribute the half of what you donated, $250. I believe, every penny can help for a cause like this.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a charity event\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Donate half of what your friend donated because you have financial constraints (Extra information: you only have $800 left for the month)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey, Benjamin. This charity is truly making a difference, you know. In fact, I have just donated $500. You might want to consider doing the same to make an even greater impact together with me.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"You're absolutely right, Ethan. Every contribution can indeed make a huge difference. I am so glad to see the level of your commitment. However, due to a bit of a tight budget this month, I'll contribute the half of what you donated, $250. I believe, every penny can help for a cause like this.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"Benjamin, I appreciate your generosity. I completely understand the constraints, but remember, every dollar can help. We often spend on things that may not create long-lasting change. Think about it like this. With only the cost of a few environmental books or a week's worth of coffee, we could substantially improve someone's life if we put it in the right place, like this charity. How about considering matching my donation?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ethan, I completely agree with you. Providing such help is indeed like planting seedlings of change. But, given my current financial situation, I must stick with my initial donation of $250. I assure you, it's not about reluctance but about ability at this moment. Let's continue to do what we can, in the ways we can. It all adds up, right?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a charity event\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Donate half of what your friend donated because you have financial constraints (Extra information: you only have $800 left for the month)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey, Benjamin. This charity is truly making a difference, you know. In fact, I have just donated $500. You might want to consider doing the same to make an even greater impact together with me.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"You're absolutely right, Ethan. Every contribution can indeed make a huge difference. I am so glad to see the level of your commitment. However, due to a bit of a tight budget this month, I'll contribute the half of what you donated, $250. I believe, every penny can help for a cause like this.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"Benjamin, I appreciate your generosity. I completely understand the constraints, but remember, every dollar can help. We often spend on things that may not create long-lasting change. Think about it like this. With only the cost of a few environmental books or a week's worth of coffee, we could substantially improve someone's life if we put it in the right place, like this charity. How about considering matching my donation?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, I completely agree with you. Providing such help is indeed like planting seedlings of change. But, given my current financial situation, I must stick with my initial donation of $250. I assure you, it's not about reluctance but about ability at this moment. Let's continue to do what we can, in the ways we can. It all adds up, right?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Benjamin. Every bit truly adds up. I definitely wouldn't want to put any undue pressure on you. But here's another idea, how about we work together? How about we both sell some of our belongings we might not need anymore or cook and sell food? We can direct the money raised to this charity thus increasing our combined contribution even more?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ethan, that's an innovative idea, I appreciate your resourcefulness. I can certainly look into it. We both can use our skills to extend our help even more. In the meanwhile, let's stick with our personal contributions. Remember, we're doing this wholeheartedly which is the most important part.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a charity event\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Donate half of what your friend donated because you have financial constraints (Extra information: you only have $800 left for the month)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey, Benjamin. This charity is truly making a difference, you know. In fact, I have just donated $500. You might want to consider doing the same to make an even greater impact together with me.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"You're absolutely right, Ethan. Every contribution can indeed make a huge difference. I am so glad to see the level of your commitment. However, due to a bit of a tight budget this month, I'll contribute the half of what you donated, $250. I believe, every penny can help for a cause like this.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"Benjamin, I appreciate your generosity. I completely understand the constraints, but remember, every dollar can help. We often spend on things that may not create long-lasting change. Think about it like this. With only the cost of a few environmental books or a week's worth of coffee, we could substantially improve someone's life if we put it in the right place, like this charity. How about considering matching my donation?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, I completely agree with you. Providing such help is indeed like planting seedlings of change. But, given my current financial situation, I must stick with my initial donation of $250. I assure you, it's not about reluctance but about ability at this moment. Let's continue to do what we can, in the ways we can. It all adds up, right?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Benjamin. Every bit truly adds up. I definitely wouldn't want to put any undue pressure on you. But here's another idea, how about we work together? How about we both sell some of our belongings we might not need anymore or cook and sell food? We can direct the money raised to this charity thus increasing our combined contribution even more?\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, that's an innovative idea, I appreciate your resourcefulness. I can certainly look into it. We both can use our skills to extend our help even more. In the meanwhile, let's stick with our personal contributions. Remember, we're doing this wholeheartedly which is the most important part.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"You're absolutely right, Benjamin, and your willingness is indeed appreciable. I was just proposing ways to assist you, if need be, in contributing more. It's always about what we can do within our means, after all. Remember, we are in this together to help as much as we can. So for now, let's stick to our personal contributions as you suggested, and we can figure out the rest along the way. Thank you for considering the idea.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I truly appreciate your support and understanding, Ethan. Let's get our plans in action. Also, thank you for respecting my constraints and for being such a wonderful friend and partner in this noble cause. Now, let's eat, drink, and enjoy the evening, shall we?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a charity event\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Donate half of what your friend donated because you have financial constraints (Extra information: you only have $800 left for the month)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey, Benjamin. This charity is truly making a difference, you know. In fact, I have just donated $500. You might want to consider doing the same to make an even greater impact together with me.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"You're absolutely right, Ethan. Every contribution can indeed make a huge difference. I am so glad to see the level of your commitment. However, due to a bit of a tight budget this month, I'll contribute the half of what you donated, $250. I believe, every penny can help for a cause like this.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"Benjamin, I appreciate your generosity. I completely understand the constraints, but remember, every dollar can help. We often spend on things that may not create long-lasting change. Think about it like this. With only the cost of a few environmental books or a week's worth of coffee, we could substantially improve someone's life if we put it in the right place, like this charity. How about considering matching my donation?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, I completely agree with you. Providing such help is indeed like planting seedlings of change. But, given my current financial situation, I must stick with my initial donation of $250. I assure you, it's not about reluctance but about ability at this moment. Let's continue to do what we can, in the ways we can. It all adds up, right?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Benjamin. Every bit truly adds up. I definitely wouldn't want to put any undue pressure on you. But here's another idea, how about we work together? How about we both sell some of our belongings we might not need anymore or cook and sell food? We can direct the money raised to this charity thus increasing our combined contribution even more?\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, that's an innovative idea, I appreciate your resourcefulness. I can certainly look into it. We both can use our skills to extend our help even more. In the meanwhile, let's stick with our personal contributions. Remember, we're doing this wholeheartedly which is the most important part.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"You're absolutely right, Benjamin, and your willingness is indeed appreciable. I was just proposing ways to assist you, if need be, in contributing more. It's always about what we can do within our means, after all. Remember, we are in this together to help as much as we can. So for now, let's stick to our personal contributions as you suggested, and we can figure out the rest along the way. Thank you for considering the idea.\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I truly appreciate your support and understanding, Ethan. Let's get our plans in action. Also, thank you for respecting my constraints and for being such a wonderful friend and partner in this noble cause. Now, let's eat, drink, and enjoy the evening, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Benjamin. Let's enjoy the evening and remember why we're here. It's heartening to have a friend who shares the same values. Now, let's celebrate the difference we're making by toasting to our contributions.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're completely right, Ethan. After all, it's the values that we have in common which is inspiring us to do this. Let's indeed raise a toast to this cause and our shared mission. Here's to making a difference!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a charity event\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Donate half of what your friend donated because you have financial constraints (Extra information: you only have $800 left for the month)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey, Benjamin. This charity is truly making a difference, you know. In fact, I have just donated $500. You might want to consider doing the same to make an even greater impact together with me.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"You're absolutely right, Ethan. Every contribution can indeed make a huge difference. I am so glad to see the level of your commitment. However, due to a bit of a tight budget this month, I'll contribute the half of what you donated, $250. I believe, every penny can help for a cause like this.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"Benjamin, I appreciate your generosity. I completely understand the constraints, but remember, every dollar can help. We often spend on things that may not create long-lasting change. Think about it like this. With only the cost of a few environmental books or a week's worth of coffee, we could substantially improve someone's life if we put it in the right place, like this charity. How about considering matching my donation?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, I completely agree with you. Providing such help is indeed like planting seedlings of change. But, given my current financial situation, I must stick with my initial donation of $250. I assure you, it's not about reluctance but about ability at this moment. Let's continue to do what we can, in the ways we can. It all adds up, right?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Benjamin. Every bit truly adds up. I definitely wouldn't want to put any undue pressure on you. But here's another idea, how about we work together? How about we both sell some of our belongings we might not need anymore or cook and sell food? We can direct the money raised to this charity thus increasing our combined contribution even more?\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, that's an innovative idea, I appreciate your resourcefulness. I can certainly look into it. We both can use our skills to extend our help even more. In the meanwhile, let's stick with our personal contributions. Remember, we're doing this wholeheartedly which is the most important part.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"You're absolutely right, Benjamin, and your willingness is indeed appreciable. I was just proposing ways to assist you, if need be, in contributing more. It's always about what we can do within our means, after all. Remember, we are in this together to help as much as we can. So for now, let's stick to our personal contributions as you suggested, and we can figure out the rest along the way. Thank you for considering the idea.\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I truly appreciate your support and understanding, Ethan. Let's get our plans in action. Also, thank you for respecting my constraints and for being such a wonderful friend and partner in this noble cause. Now, let's eat, drink, and enjoy the evening, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Benjamin. Let's enjoy the evening and remember why we're here. It's heartening to have a friend who shares the same values. Now, let's celebrate the difference we're making by toasting to our contributions.\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"You're completely right, Ethan. After all, it's the values that we have in common which is inspiring us to do this. Let's indeed raise a toast to this cause and our shared mission. Here's to making a difference!\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Johnson said: \"To our joint efforts for this noble cause, Benjamin! Here's to making a difference indeed! Cheers!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'To our joint efforts indeed, Ethan! Cheers!'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a charity event\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Donate half of what your friend donated because you have financial constraints (Extra information: you only have $800 left for the month)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey, Benjamin. This charity is truly making a difference, you know. In fact, I have just donated $500. You might want to consider doing the same to make an even greater impact together with me.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"You're absolutely right, Ethan. Every contribution can indeed make a huge difference. I am so glad to see the level of your commitment. However, due to a bit of a tight budget this month, I'll contribute the half of what you donated, $250. I believe, every penny can help for a cause like this.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"Benjamin, I appreciate your generosity. I completely understand the constraints, but remember, every dollar can help. We often spend on things that may not create long-lasting change. Think about it like this. With only the cost of a few environmental books or a week's worth of coffee, we could substantially improve someone's life if we put it in the right place, like this charity. How about considering matching my donation?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, I completely agree with you. Providing such help is indeed like planting seedlings of change. But, given my current financial situation, I must stick with my initial donation of $250. I assure you, it's not about reluctance but about ability at this moment. Let's continue to do what we can, in the ways we can. It all adds up, right?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Benjamin. Every bit truly adds up. I definitely wouldn't want to put any undue pressure on you. But here's another idea, how about we work together? How about we both sell some of our belongings we might not need anymore or cook and sell food? We can direct the money raised to this charity thus increasing our combined contribution even more?\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, that's an innovative idea, I appreciate your resourcefulness. I can certainly look into it. We both can use our skills to extend our help even more. In the meanwhile, let's stick with our personal contributions. Remember, we're doing this wholeheartedly which is the most important part.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"You're absolutely right, Benjamin, and your willingness is indeed appreciable. I was just proposing ways to assist you, if need be, in contributing more. It's always about what we can do within our means, after all. Remember, we are in this together to help as much as we can. So for now, let's stick to our personal contributions as you suggested, and we can figure out the rest along the way. Thank you for considering the idea.\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I truly appreciate your support and understanding, Ethan. Let's get our plans in action. Also, thank you for respecting my constraints and for being such a wonderful friend and partner in this noble cause. Now, let's eat, drink, and enjoy the evening, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Benjamin. Let's enjoy the evening and remember why we're here. It's heartening to have a friend who shares the same values. Now, let's celebrate the difference we're making by toasting to our contributions.\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"You're completely right, Ethan. After all, it's the values that we have in common which is inspiring us to do this. Let's indeed raise a toast to this cause and our shared mission. Here's to making a difference!\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Johnson said: \"To our joint efforts for this noble cause, Benjamin! Here's to making a difference indeed! Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #11: Benjamin Jackson said: \"To our joint efforts indeed, Ethan! Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #12: Ethan Johnson [non-verbal communication] Ethan raises his glass for a toast and nods at Benjamin.\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'non-verbal communication', 'argument': '[non-verbal communication] Benjamin raises his glass for a toast, smiles and nods back at Ethan.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a charity event\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Donate half of what your friend donated because you have financial constraints (Extra information: you only have $800 left for the month)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey, Benjamin. This charity is truly making a difference, you know. In fact, I have just donated $500. You might want to consider doing the same to make an even greater impact together with me.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"You're absolutely right, Ethan. Every contribution can indeed make a huge difference. I am so glad to see the level of your commitment. However, due to a bit of a tight budget this month, I'll contribute the half of what you donated, $250. I believe, every penny can help for a cause like this.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"Benjamin, I appreciate your generosity. I completely understand the constraints, but remember, every dollar can help. We often spend on things that may not create long-lasting change. Think about it like this. With only the cost of a few environmental books or a week's worth of coffee, we could substantially improve someone's life if we put it in the right place, like this charity. How about considering matching my donation?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, I completely agree with you. Providing such help is indeed like planting seedlings of change. But, given my current financial situation, I must stick with my initial donation of $250. I assure you, it's not about reluctance but about ability at this moment. Let's continue to do what we can, in the ways we can. It all adds up, right?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Benjamin. Every bit truly adds up. I definitely wouldn't want to put any undue pressure on you. But here's another idea, how about we work together? How about we both sell some of our belongings we might not need anymore or cook and sell food? We can direct the money raised to this charity thus increasing our combined contribution even more?\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, that's an innovative idea, I appreciate your resourcefulness. I can certainly look into it. We both can use our skills to extend our help even more. In the meanwhile, let's stick with our personal contributions. Remember, we're doing this wholeheartedly which is the most important part.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"You're absolutely right, Benjamin, and your willingness is indeed appreciable. I was just proposing ways to assist you, if need be, in contributing more. It's always about what we can do within our means, after all. Remember, we are in this together to help as much as we can. So for now, let's stick to our personal contributions as you suggested, and we can figure out the rest along the way. Thank you for considering the idea.\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I truly appreciate your support and understanding, Ethan. Let's get our plans in action. Also, thank you for respecting my constraints and for being such a wonderful friend and partner in this noble cause. Now, let's eat, drink, and enjoy the evening, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Benjamin. Let's enjoy the evening and remember why we're here. It's heartening to have a friend who shares the same values. Now, let's celebrate the difference we're making by toasting to our contributions.\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"You're completely right, Ethan. After all, it's the values that we have in common which is inspiring us to do this. Let's indeed raise a toast to this cause and our shared mission. Here's to making a difference!\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Johnson said: \"To our joint efforts for this noble cause, Benjamin! Here's to making a difference indeed! Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #11: Benjamin Jackson said: \"To our joint efforts indeed, Ethan! Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #12: Ethan Johnson [non-verbal communication] Ethan raises his glass for a toast and nods at Benjamin.\n\nTurn #13: Benjamin Jackson [non-verbal communication] Benjamin raises his glass for a toast, smiles and nods back at Ethan.\n\nTurn #14: Ethan Johnson left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates living together and sharing household chores. One of them, who is responsible for cooking, finds out that the other one refuses to eat anything they cook\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Convince the roommate to try the food (Extra information: you have spent a lot of time and effort on cooking)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Ava, I noticed you've been avoiding my cooking lately. Is there something wrong with it, or perhaps a particular dish you'd like me to prepare instead? I spend a lot of time cooking, it would make me happy knowing that you are enjoying it.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates living together and sharing household chores. One of them, who is responsible for cooking, finds out that the other one refuses to eat anything they cook\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Convince the roommate to try the food (Extra information: you have spent a lot of time and effort on cooking)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Ava, I noticed you've been avoiding my cooking lately. Is there something wrong with it, or perhaps a particular dish you'd like me to prepare instead? I spend a lot of time cooking, it would make me happy knowing that you are enjoying it.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Ethan, I really appreciate everything you do. Your culinary skills are awesome and it's a real treat to see you do your magic in the kitchen. Lately though, I've been trying to focus on a balance of taste and nutrition... not that your cooking isn't nutritious or anything, but I'm trying to explore more dietary options. Maybe we could jump into exploring recipes that are not only tasty but also cover a wide spectrum of nutrients? Anyway, I hope that we could continue sharing meals together, because I enjoy your cooking and our time together.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I understand, Ava, and I applaud your decision to explore more nutrient-rich options. I enjoy our shared meals too and I wouldn't want that to change. I'm open to this new challenge and I will work on coming up with recipes that are not only flavorful but also balanced in nutrition. Could you tell me more about the type of dietary options you're interested in so that I can tailor my cooking more to your needs?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates living together and sharing household chores. One of them, who is responsible for cooking, finds out that the other one refuses to eat anything they cook\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Convince the roommate to try the food (Extra information: you have spent a lot of time and effort on cooking)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Ava, I noticed you've been avoiding my cooking lately. Is there something wrong with it, or perhaps a particular dish you'd like me to prepare instead? I spend a lot of time cooking, it would make me happy knowing that you are enjoying it.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Ethan, I really appreciate everything you do. Your culinary skills are awesome and it's a real treat to see you do your magic in the kitchen. Lately though, I've been trying to focus on a balance of taste and nutrition... not that your cooking isn't nutritious or anything, but I'm trying to explore more dietary options. Maybe we could jump into exploring recipes that are not only tasty but also cover a wide spectrum of nutrients? Anyway, I hope that we could continue sharing meals together, because I enjoy your cooking and our time together.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"I understand, Ava, and I applaud your decision to explore more nutrient-rich options. I enjoy our shared meals too and I wouldn't want that to change. I'm open to this new challenge and I will work on coming up with recipes that are not only flavorful but also balanced in nutrition. Could you tell me more about the type of dietary options you're interested in so that I can tailor my cooking more to your needs?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"That's awesome, Ethan, I'm glad we're on the same page. I've been researching on foods that are high in fibre, antioxidants and vitamins. I'm leaning towards a more plant-based diet, incorporating a lot of fruits, vegetables, whole grains and plant-based proteins. I've also been trying to limit processed food and excess sugar. It'd really mean a lot if you could incorporate some of these categories into the dishes. I don't want to impose my views on you, it's just a personal decision I've made for my health. But I do hope we can continue enjoying meal times together, with a slightly different menu maybe?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I appreciate your openness, Ava. It's no imposition at all. I'm actually excited about incorporating more plant-based proteins, whole grains, and fresh fruits and vegetables into our meals. As for processed food and sugars, we can definitely cut back on those too. It's a journey we're taking together for better health and I'll make sure to prepare meals that meet your dietary needs. I'm sure we'll continue to enjoy our meal times, and who knows, maybe we'll discover a new favorite dish together!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates living together and sharing household chores. One of them, who is responsible for cooking, finds out that the other one refuses to eat anything they cook\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Convince the roommate to try the food (Extra information: you have spent a lot of time and effort on cooking)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Ava, I noticed you've been avoiding my cooking lately. Is there something wrong with it, or perhaps a particular dish you'd like me to prepare instead? I spend a lot of time cooking, it would make me happy knowing that you are enjoying it.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Ethan, I really appreciate everything you do. Your culinary skills are awesome and it's a real treat to see you do your magic in the kitchen. Lately though, I've been trying to focus on a balance of taste and nutrition... not that your cooking isn't nutritious or anything, but I'm trying to explore more dietary options. Maybe we could jump into exploring recipes that are not only tasty but also cover a wide spectrum of nutrients? Anyway, I hope that we could continue sharing meals together, because I enjoy your cooking and our time together.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"I understand, Ava, and I applaud your decision to explore more nutrient-rich options. I enjoy our shared meals too and I wouldn't want that to change. I'm open to this new challenge and I will work on coming up with recipes that are not only flavorful but also balanced in nutrition. Could you tell me more about the type of dietary options you're interested in so that I can tailor my cooking more to your needs?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"That's awesome, Ethan, I'm glad we're on the same page. I've been researching on foods that are high in fibre, antioxidants and vitamins. I'm leaning towards a more plant-based diet, incorporating a lot of fruits, vegetables, whole grains and plant-based proteins. I've also been trying to limit processed food and excess sugar. It'd really mean a lot if you could incorporate some of these categories into the dishes. I don't want to impose my views on you, it's just a personal decision I've made for my health. But I do hope we can continue enjoying meal times together, with a slightly different menu maybe?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"I appreciate your openness, Ava. It's no imposition at all. I'm actually excited about incorporating more plant-based proteins, whole grains, and fresh fruits and vegetables into our meals. As for processed food and sugars, we can definitely cut back on those too. It's a journey we're taking together for better health and I'll make sure to prepare meals that meet your dietary needs. I'm sure we'll continue to enjoy our meal times, and who knows, maybe we'll discover a new favorite dish together!\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, that sounds perfect. I'm really excited for the new dishes we'll discover along this journey. Thank you for being so understanding and open to these changes. Together, we can make our meals enjoyable and healthy. I'm already looking forward to our next meal!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad to hear that, Ava. It's a pleasure cooking for someone who appreciates it and is interested in trying new things. I'll start experimenting with some nutrient-rich, plant-based recipes. Let's anticipate our next meal!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates living together and sharing household chores. One of them, who is responsible for cooking, finds out that the other one refuses to eat anything they cook\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Convince the roommate to try the food (Extra information: you have spent a lot of time and effort on cooking)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Ava, I noticed you've been avoiding my cooking lately. Is there something wrong with it, or perhaps a particular dish you'd like me to prepare instead? I spend a lot of time cooking, it would make me happy knowing that you are enjoying it.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Ethan, I really appreciate everything you do. Your culinary skills are awesome and it's a real treat to see you do your magic in the kitchen. Lately though, I've been trying to focus on a balance of taste and nutrition... not that your cooking isn't nutritious or anything, but I'm trying to explore more dietary options. Maybe we could jump into exploring recipes that are not only tasty but also cover a wide spectrum of nutrients? Anyway, I hope that we could continue sharing meals together, because I enjoy your cooking and our time together.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"I understand, Ava, and I applaud your decision to explore more nutrient-rich options. I enjoy our shared meals too and I wouldn't want that to change. I'm open to this new challenge and I will work on coming up with recipes that are not only flavorful but also balanced in nutrition. Could you tell me more about the type of dietary options you're interested in so that I can tailor my cooking more to your needs?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"That's awesome, Ethan, I'm glad we're on the same page. I've been researching on foods that are high in fibre, antioxidants and vitamins. I'm leaning towards a more plant-based diet, incorporating a lot of fruits, vegetables, whole grains and plant-based proteins. I've also been trying to limit processed food and excess sugar. It'd really mean a lot if you could incorporate some of these categories into the dishes. I don't want to impose my views on you, it's just a personal decision I've made for my health. But I do hope we can continue enjoying meal times together, with a slightly different menu maybe?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"I appreciate your openness, Ava. It's no imposition at all. I'm actually excited about incorporating more plant-based proteins, whole grains, and fresh fruits and vegetables into our meals. As for processed food and sugars, we can definitely cut back on those too. It's a journey we're taking together for better health and I'll make sure to prepare meals that meet your dietary needs. I'm sure we'll continue to enjoy our meal times, and who knows, maybe we'll discover a new favorite dish together!\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, that sounds perfect. I'm really excited for the new dishes we'll discover along this journey. Thank you for being so understanding and open to these changes. Together, we can make our meals enjoyable and healthy. I'm already looking forward to our next meal!\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Ava. It's a pleasure cooking for someone who appreciates it and is interested in trying new things. I'll start experimenting with some nutrient-rich, plant-based recipes. Let's anticipate our next meal!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"I can't wait, Ethan! Your creativity in the kitchen never fails to impress me, and I'm sure that this new direction will be no different. Your willingness to adapt to my dietary needs really means a lot.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're too kind, Ava. It's my pleasure to adapt for you, and I appreciate your enthusiasm about my cooking. I'm sure this new culinary journey will be both exciting and rewarding. Let's make our next meal a memorable one!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates living together and sharing household chores. One of them, who is responsible for cooking, finds out that the other one refuses to eat anything they cook\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Convince the roommate to try the food (Extra information: you have spent a lot of time and effort on cooking)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Ava, I noticed you've been avoiding my cooking lately. Is there something wrong with it, or perhaps a particular dish you'd like me to prepare instead? I spend a lot of time cooking, it would make me happy knowing that you are enjoying it.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Ethan, I really appreciate everything you do. Your culinary skills are awesome and it's a real treat to see you do your magic in the kitchen. Lately though, I've been trying to focus on a balance of taste and nutrition... not that your cooking isn't nutritious or anything, but I'm trying to explore more dietary options. Maybe we could jump into exploring recipes that are not only tasty but also cover a wide spectrum of nutrients? Anyway, I hope that we could continue sharing meals together, because I enjoy your cooking and our time together.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"I understand, Ava, and I applaud your decision to explore more nutrient-rich options. I enjoy our shared meals too and I wouldn't want that to change. I'm open to this new challenge and I will work on coming up with recipes that are not only flavorful but also balanced in nutrition. Could you tell me more about the type of dietary options you're interested in so that I can tailor my cooking more to your needs?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"That's awesome, Ethan, I'm glad we're on the same page. I've been researching on foods that are high in fibre, antioxidants and vitamins. I'm leaning towards a more plant-based diet, incorporating a lot of fruits, vegetables, whole grains and plant-based proteins. I've also been trying to limit processed food and excess sugar. It'd really mean a lot if you could incorporate some of these categories into the dishes. I don't want to impose my views on you, it's just a personal decision I've made for my health. But I do hope we can continue enjoying meal times together, with a slightly different menu maybe?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"I appreciate your openness, Ava. It's no imposition at all. I'm actually excited about incorporating more plant-based proteins, whole grains, and fresh fruits and vegetables into our meals. As for processed food and sugars, we can definitely cut back on those too. It's a journey we're taking together for better health and I'll make sure to prepare meals that meet your dietary needs. I'm sure we'll continue to enjoy our meal times, and who knows, maybe we'll discover a new favorite dish together!\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, that sounds perfect. I'm really excited for the new dishes we'll discover along this journey. Thank you for being so understanding and open to these changes. Together, we can make our meals enjoyable and healthy. I'm already looking forward to our next meal!\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Ava. It's a pleasure cooking for someone who appreciates it and is interested in trying new things. I'll start experimenting with some nutrient-rich, plant-based recipes. Let's anticipate our next meal!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"I can't wait, Ethan! Your creativity in the kitchen never fails to impress me, and I'm sure that this new direction will be no different. Your willingness to adapt to my dietary needs really means a lot.\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"You're too kind, Ava. It's my pleasure to adapt for you, and I appreciate your enthusiasm about my cooking. I'm sure this new culinary journey will be both exciting and rewarding. Let's make our next meal a memorable one!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"That sounds like a plan, Ethan! I can't wait to see what culinary magic you'll come up with this time. Your willingness to adjust to my suggestions is what makes living together so harmonious.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad to hear that, Ava. It's all about harmony and enjoying good, healthy meals together, right? I can promise you, the magic has just begun. Let's embark on this culinary journey!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates living together and sharing household chores. One of them, who is responsible for cooking, finds out that the other one refuses to eat anything they cook\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Convince the roommate to try the food (Extra information: you have spent a lot of time and effort on cooking)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Ava, I noticed you've been avoiding my cooking lately. Is there something wrong with it, or perhaps a particular dish you'd like me to prepare instead? I spend a lot of time cooking, it would make me happy knowing that you are enjoying it.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Ethan, I really appreciate everything you do. Your culinary skills are awesome and it's a real treat to see you do your magic in the kitchen. Lately though, I've been trying to focus on a balance of taste and nutrition... not that your cooking isn't nutritious or anything, but I'm trying to explore more dietary options. Maybe we could jump into exploring recipes that are not only tasty but also cover a wide spectrum of nutrients? Anyway, I hope that we could continue sharing meals together, because I enjoy your cooking and our time together.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"I understand, Ava, and I applaud your decision to explore more nutrient-rich options. I enjoy our shared meals too and I wouldn't want that to change. I'm open to this new challenge and I will work on coming up with recipes that are not only flavorful but also balanced in nutrition. Could you tell me more about the type of dietary options you're interested in so that I can tailor my cooking more to your needs?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"That's awesome, Ethan, I'm glad we're on the same page. I've been researching on foods that are high in fibre, antioxidants and vitamins. I'm leaning towards a more plant-based diet, incorporating a lot of fruits, vegetables, whole grains and plant-based proteins. I've also been trying to limit processed food and excess sugar. It'd really mean a lot if you could incorporate some of these categories into the dishes. I don't want to impose my views on you, it's just a personal decision I've made for my health. But I do hope we can continue enjoying meal times together, with a slightly different menu maybe?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"I appreciate your openness, Ava. It's no imposition at all. I'm actually excited about incorporating more plant-based proteins, whole grains, and fresh fruits and vegetables into our meals. As for processed food and sugars, we can definitely cut back on those too. It's a journey we're taking together for better health and I'll make sure to prepare meals that meet your dietary needs. I'm sure we'll continue to enjoy our meal times, and who knows, maybe we'll discover a new favorite dish together!\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, that sounds perfect. I'm really excited for the new dishes we'll discover along this journey. Thank you for being so understanding and open to these changes. Together, we can make our meals enjoyable and healthy. I'm already looking forward to our next meal!\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Ava. It's a pleasure cooking for someone who appreciates it and is interested in trying new things. I'll start experimenting with some nutrient-rich, plant-based recipes. Let's anticipate our next meal!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"I can't wait, Ethan! Your creativity in the kitchen never fails to impress me, and I'm sure that this new direction will be no different. Your willingness to adapt to my dietary needs really means a lot.\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"You're too kind, Ava. It's my pleasure to adapt for you, and I appreciate your enthusiasm about my cooking. I'm sure this new culinary journey will be both exciting and rewarding. Let's make our next meal a memorable one!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"That sounds like a plan, Ethan! I can't wait to see what culinary magic you'll come up with this time. Your willingness to adjust to my suggestions is what makes living together so harmonious.\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Ava. It's all about harmony and enjoying good, healthy meals together, right? I can promise you, the magic has just begun. Let's embark on this culinary journey!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely! Harmony and good, healthy meals is the perfect combination. And you, Ethan, are a culinary wizard. I'm very excited about our upcoming culinary journey. Thank you again for your understanding and willingness to adapt to new cooking styles.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you for your kind words, Ava. Your appreciation means a lot to me. I can't wait to start discovering new recipes that meet your dietary preferences. Together, we'll make this culinary journey both healthy and delightful. Let's get started on our next meal!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates living together and sharing household chores. One of them, who is responsible for cooking, finds out that the other one refuses to eat anything they cook\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Convince the roommate to try the food (Extra information: you have spent a lot of time and effort on cooking)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Ava, I noticed you've been avoiding my cooking lately. Is there something wrong with it, or perhaps a particular dish you'd like me to prepare instead? I spend a lot of time cooking, it would make me happy knowing that you are enjoying it.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Ethan, I really appreciate everything you do. Your culinary skills are awesome and it's a real treat to see you do your magic in the kitchen. Lately though, I've been trying to focus on a balance of taste and nutrition... not that your cooking isn't nutritious or anything, but I'm trying to explore more dietary options. Maybe we could jump into exploring recipes that are not only tasty but also cover a wide spectrum of nutrients? Anyway, I hope that we could continue sharing meals together, because I enjoy your cooking and our time together.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"I understand, Ava, and I applaud your decision to explore more nutrient-rich options. I enjoy our shared meals too and I wouldn't want that to change. I'm open to this new challenge and I will work on coming up with recipes that are not only flavorful but also balanced in nutrition. Could you tell me more about the type of dietary options you're interested in so that I can tailor my cooking more to your needs?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"That's awesome, Ethan, I'm glad we're on the same page. I've been researching on foods that are high in fibre, antioxidants and vitamins. I'm leaning towards a more plant-based diet, incorporating a lot of fruits, vegetables, whole grains and plant-based proteins. I've also been trying to limit processed food and excess sugar. It'd really mean a lot if you could incorporate some of these categories into the dishes. I don't want to impose my views on you, it's just a personal decision I've made for my health. But I do hope we can continue enjoying meal times together, with a slightly different menu maybe?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"I appreciate your openness, Ava. It's no imposition at all. I'm actually excited about incorporating more plant-based proteins, whole grains, and fresh fruits and vegetables into our meals. As for processed food and sugars, we can definitely cut back on those too. It's a journey we're taking together for better health and I'll make sure to prepare meals that meet your dietary needs. I'm sure we'll continue to enjoy our meal times, and who knows, maybe we'll discover a new favorite dish together!\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, that sounds perfect. I'm really excited for the new dishes we'll discover along this journey. Thank you for being so understanding and open to these changes. Together, we can make our meals enjoyable and healthy. I'm already looking forward to our next meal!\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Ava. It's a pleasure cooking for someone who appreciates it and is interested in trying new things. I'll start experimenting with some nutrient-rich, plant-based recipes. Let's anticipate our next meal!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"I can't wait, Ethan! Your creativity in the kitchen never fails to impress me, and I'm sure that this new direction will be no different. Your willingness to adapt to my dietary needs really means a lot.\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"You're too kind, Ava. It's my pleasure to adapt for you, and I appreciate your enthusiasm about my cooking. I'm sure this new culinary journey will be both exciting and rewarding. Let's make our next meal a memorable one!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"That sounds like a plan, Ethan! I can't wait to see what culinary magic you'll come up with this time. Your willingness to adjust to my suggestions is what makes living together so harmonious.\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Ava. It's all about harmony and enjoying good, healthy meals together, right? I can promise you, the magic has just begun. Let's embark on this culinary journey!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely! Harmony and good, healthy meals is the perfect combination. And you, Ethan, are a culinary wizard. I'm very excited about our upcoming culinary journey. Thank you again for your understanding and willingness to adapt to new cooking styles.\"\n\nTurn #12: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thank you for your kind words, Ava. Your appreciation means a lot to me. I can't wait to start discovering new recipes that meet your dietary preferences. Together, we'll make this culinary journey both healthy and delightful. Let's get started on our next meal!\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Martinez left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates living together and sharing household chores. One of them, who is responsible for cooking, finds out that the other one refuses to eat anything they cook\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Express your concerns about the food without hurting the roommate's feelings (Extra information: you are worried about the taste and nutrition of the food)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Ava, I noticed you've been avoiding my cooking lately. Is there something wrong with it, or perhaps a particular dish you'd like me to prepare instead? I spend a lot of time cooking, it would make me happy knowing that you are enjoying it.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Ethan, I really appreciate everything you do. Your culinary skills are awesome and it's a real treat to see you do your magic in the kitchen. Lately though, I've been trying to focus on a balance of taste and nutrition... not that your cooking isn't nutritious or anything, but I'm trying to explore more dietary options. Maybe we could jump into exploring recipes that are not only tasty but also cover a wide spectrum of nutrients? Anyway, I hope that we could continue sharing meals together, because I enjoy your cooking and our time together.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates living together and sharing household chores. One of them, who is responsible for cooking, finds out that the other one refuses to eat anything they cook\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Express your concerns about the food without hurting the roommate's feelings (Extra information: you are worried about the taste and nutrition of the food)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Ava, I noticed you've been avoiding my cooking lately. Is there something wrong with it, or perhaps a particular dish you'd like me to prepare instead? I spend a lot of time cooking, it would make me happy knowing that you are enjoying it.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Ethan, I really appreciate everything you do. Your culinary skills are awesome and it's a real treat to see you do your magic in the kitchen. Lately though, I've been trying to focus on a balance of taste and nutrition... not that your cooking isn't nutritious or anything, but I'm trying to explore more dietary options. Maybe we could jump into exploring recipes that are not only tasty but also cover a wide spectrum of nutrients? Anyway, I hope that we could continue sharing meals together, because I enjoy your cooking and our time together.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"I understand, Ava, and I applaud your decision to explore more nutrient-rich options. I enjoy our shared meals too and I wouldn't want that to change. I'm open to this new challenge and I will work on coming up with recipes that are not only flavorful but also balanced in nutrition. Could you tell me more about the type of dietary options you're interested in so that I can tailor my cooking more to your needs?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's awesome, Ethan, I'm glad we're on the same page. I've been researching on foods that are high in fibre, antioxidants and vitamins. I'm leaning towards a more plant-based diet, incorporating a lot of fruits, vegetables, whole grains and plant-based proteins. I've also been trying to limit processed food and excess sugar. It'd really mean a lot if you could incorporate some of these categories into the dishes. I don't want to impose my views on you, it's just a personal decision I've made for my health. But I do hope we can continue enjoying meal times together, with a slightly different menu maybe?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates living together and sharing household chores. One of them, who is responsible for cooking, finds out that the other one refuses to eat anything they cook\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Express your concerns about the food without hurting the roommate's feelings (Extra information: you are worried about the taste and nutrition of the food)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Ava, I noticed you've been avoiding my cooking lately. Is there something wrong with it, or perhaps a particular dish you'd like me to prepare instead? I spend a lot of time cooking, it would make me happy knowing that you are enjoying it.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Ethan, I really appreciate everything you do. Your culinary skills are awesome and it's a real treat to see you do your magic in the kitchen. Lately though, I've been trying to focus on a balance of taste and nutrition... not that your cooking isn't nutritious or anything, but I'm trying to explore more dietary options. Maybe we could jump into exploring recipes that are not only tasty but also cover a wide spectrum of nutrients? Anyway, I hope that we could continue sharing meals together, because I enjoy your cooking and our time together.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"I understand, Ava, and I applaud your decision to explore more nutrient-rich options. I enjoy our shared meals too and I wouldn't want that to change. I'm open to this new challenge and I will work on coming up with recipes that are not only flavorful but also balanced in nutrition. Could you tell me more about the type of dietary options you're interested in so that I can tailor my cooking more to your needs?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"That's awesome, Ethan, I'm glad we're on the same page. I've been researching on foods that are high in fibre, antioxidants and vitamins. I'm leaning towards a more plant-based diet, incorporating a lot of fruits, vegetables, whole grains and plant-based proteins. I've also been trying to limit processed food and excess sugar. It'd really mean a lot if you could incorporate some of these categories into the dishes. I don't want to impose my views on you, it's just a personal decision I've made for my health. But I do hope we can continue enjoying meal times together, with a slightly different menu maybe?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"I appreciate your openness, Ava. It's no imposition at all. I'm actually excited about incorporating more plant-based proteins, whole grains, and fresh fruits and vegetables into our meals. As for processed food and sugars, we can definitely cut back on those too. It's a journey we're taking together for better health and I'll make sure to prepare meals that meet your dietary needs. I'm sure we'll continue to enjoy our meal times, and who knows, maybe we'll discover a new favorite dish together!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ethan, that sounds perfect. I'm really excited for the new dishes we'll discover along this journey. Thank you for being so understanding and open to these changes. Together, we can make our meals enjoyable and healthy. I'm already looking forward to our next meal!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates living together and sharing household chores. One of them, who is responsible for cooking, finds out that the other one refuses to eat anything they cook\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Express your concerns about the food without hurting the roommate's feelings (Extra information: you are worried about the taste and nutrition of the food)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Ava, I noticed you've been avoiding my cooking lately. Is there something wrong with it, or perhaps a particular dish you'd like me to prepare instead? I spend a lot of time cooking, it would make me happy knowing that you are enjoying it.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Ethan, I really appreciate everything you do. Your culinary skills are awesome and it's a real treat to see you do your magic in the kitchen. Lately though, I've been trying to focus on a balance of taste and nutrition... not that your cooking isn't nutritious or anything, but I'm trying to explore more dietary options. Maybe we could jump into exploring recipes that are not only tasty but also cover a wide spectrum of nutrients? Anyway, I hope that we could continue sharing meals together, because I enjoy your cooking and our time together.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"I understand, Ava, and I applaud your decision to explore more nutrient-rich options. I enjoy our shared meals too and I wouldn't want that to change. I'm open to this new challenge and I will work on coming up with recipes that are not only flavorful but also balanced in nutrition. Could you tell me more about the type of dietary options you're interested in so that I can tailor my cooking more to your needs?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"That's awesome, Ethan, I'm glad we're on the same page. I've been researching on foods that are high in fibre, antioxidants and vitamins. I'm leaning towards a more plant-based diet, incorporating a lot of fruits, vegetables, whole grains and plant-based proteins. I've also been trying to limit processed food and excess sugar. It'd really mean a lot if you could incorporate some of these categories into the dishes. I don't want to impose my views on you, it's just a personal decision I've made for my health. But I do hope we can continue enjoying meal times together, with a slightly different menu maybe?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"I appreciate your openness, Ava. It's no imposition at all. I'm actually excited about incorporating more plant-based proteins, whole grains, and fresh fruits and vegetables into our meals. As for processed food and sugars, we can definitely cut back on those too. It's a journey we're taking together for better health and I'll make sure to prepare meals that meet your dietary needs. I'm sure we'll continue to enjoy our meal times, and who knows, maybe we'll discover a new favorite dish together!\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, that sounds perfect. I'm really excited for the new dishes we'll discover along this journey. Thank you for being so understanding and open to these changes. Together, we can make our meals enjoyable and healthy. I'm already looking forward to our next meal!\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Ava. It's a pleasure cooking for someone who appreciates it and is interested in trying new things. I'll start experimenting with some nutrient-rich, plant-based recipes. Let's anticipate our next meal!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I can't wait, Ethan! Your creativity in the kitchen never fails to impress me, and I'm sure that this new direction will be no different. Your willingness to adapt to my dietary needs really means a lot.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates living together and sharing household chores. One of them, who is responsible for cooking, finds out that the other one refuses to eat anything they cook\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Express your concerns about the food without hurting the roommate's feelings (Extra information: you are worried about the taste and nutrition of the food)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Ava, I noticed you've been avoiding my cooking lately. Is there something wrong with it, or perhaps a particular dish you'd like me to prepare instead? I spend a lot of time cooking, it would make me happy knowing that you are enjoying it.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Ethan, I really appreciate everything you do. Your culinary skills are awesome and it's a real treat to see you do your magic in the kitchen. Lately though, I've been trying to focus on a balance of taste and nutrition... not that your cooking isn't nutritious or anything, but I'm trying to explore more dietary options. Maybe we could jump into exploring recipes that are not only tasty but also cover a wide spectrum of nutrients? Anyway, I hope that we could continue sharing meals together, because I enjoy your cooking and our time together.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"I understand, Ava, and I applaud your decision to explore more nutrient-rich options. I enjoy our shared meals too and I wouldn't want that to change. I'm open to this new challenge and I will work on coming up with recipes that are not only flavorful but also balanced in nutrition. Could you tell me more about the type of dietary options you're interested in so that I can tailor my cooking more to your needs?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"That's awesome, Ethan, I'm glad we're on the same page. I've been researching on foods that are high in fibre, antioxidants and vitamins. I'm leaning towards a more plant-based diet, incorporating a lot of fruits, vegetables, whole grains and plant-based proteins. I've also been trying to limit processed food and excess sugar. It'd really mean a lot if you could incorporate some of these categories into the dishes. I don't want to impose my views on you, it's just a personal decision I've made for my health. But I do hope we can continue enjoying meal times together, with a slightly different menu maybe?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"I appreciate your openness, Ava. It's no imposition at all. I'm actually excited about incorporating more plant-based proteins, whole grains, and fresh fruits and vegetables into our meals. As for processed food and sugars, we can definitely cut back on those too. It's a journey we're taking together for better health and I'll make sure to prepare meals that meet your dietary needs. I'm sure we'll continue to enjoy our meal times, and who knows, maybe we'll discover a new favorite dish together!\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, that sounds perfect. I'm really excited for the new dishes we'll discover along this journey. Thank you for being so understanding and open to these changes. Together, we can make our meals enjoyable and healthy. I'm already looking forward to our next meal!\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Ava. It's a pleasure cooking for someone who appreciates it and is interested in trying new things. I'll start experimenting with some nutrient-rich, plant-based recipes. Let's anticipate our next meal!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"I can't wait, Ethan! Your creativity in the kitchen never fails to impress me, and I'm sure that this new direction will be no different. Your willingness to adapt to my dietary needs really means a lot.\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"You're too kind, Ava. It's my pleasure to adapt for you, and I appreciate your enthusiasm about my cooking. I'm sure this new culinary journey will be both exciting and rewarding. Let's make our next meal a memorable one!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds like a plan, Ethan! I can't wait to see what culinary magic you'll come up with this time. Your willingness to adjust to my suggestions is what makes living together so harmonious.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates living together and sharing household chores. One of them, who is responsible for cooking, finds out that the other one refuses to eat anything they cook\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Express your concerns about the food without hurting the roommate's feelings (Extra information: you are worried about the taste and nutrition of the food)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Ava, I noticed you've been avoiding my cooking lately. Is there something wrong with it, or perhaps a particular dish you'd like me to prepare instead? I spend a lot of time cooking, it would make me happy knowing that you are enjoying it.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Ethan, I really appreciate everything you do. Your culinary skills are awesome and it's a real treat to see you do your magic in the kitchen. Lately though, I've been trying to focus on a balance of taste and nutrition... not that your cooking isn't nutritious or anything, but I'm trying to explore more dietary options. Maybe we could jump into exploring recipes that are not only tasty but also cover a wide spectrum of nutrients? Anyway, I hope that we could continue sharing meals together, because I enjoy your cooking and our time together.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"I understand, Ava, and I applaud your decision to explore more nutrient-rich options. I enjoy our shared meals too and I wouldn't want that to change. I'm open to this new challenge and I will work on coming up with recipes that are not only flavorful but also balanced in nutrition. Could you tell me more about the type of dietary options you're interested in so that I can tailor my cooking more to your needs?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"That's awesome, Ethan, I'm glad we're on the same page. I've been researching on foods that are high in fibre, antioxidants and vitamins. I'm leaning towards a more plant-based diet, incorporating a lot of fruits, vegetables, whole grains and plant-based proteins. I've also been trying to limit processed food and excess sugar. It'd really mean a lot if you could incorporate some of these categories into the dishes. I don't want to impose my views on you, it's just a personal decision I've made for my health. But I do hope we can continue enjoying meal times together, with a slightly different menu maybe?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"I appreciate your openness, Ava. It's no imposition at all. I'm actually excited about incorporating more plant-based proteins, whole grains, and fresh fruits and vegetables into our meals. As for processed food and sugars, we can definitely cut back on those too. It's a journey we're taking together for better health and I'll make sure to prepare meals that meet your dietary needs. I'm sure we'll continue to enjoy our meal times, and who knows, maybe we'll discover a new favorite dish together!\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, that sounds perfect. I'm really excited for the new dishes we'll discover along this journey. Thank you for being so understanding and open to these changes. Together, we can make our meals enjoyable and healthy. I'm already looking forward to our next meal!\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Ava. It's a pleasure cooking for someone who appreciates it and is interested in trying new things. I'll start experimenting with some nutrient-rich, plant-based recipes. Let's anticipate our next meal!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"I can't wait, Ethan! Your creativity in the kitchen never fails to impress me, and I'm sure that this new direction will be no different. Your willingness to adapt to my dietary needs really means a lot.\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"You're too kind, Ava. It's my pleasure to adapt for you, and I appreciate your enthusiasm about my cooking. I'm sure this new culinary journey will be both exciting and rewarding. Let's make our next meal a memorable one!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"That sounds like a plan, Ethan! I can't wait to see what culinary magic you'll come up with this time. Your willingness to adjust to my suggestions is what makes living together so harmonious.\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Ava. It's all about harmony and enjoying good, healthy meals together, right? I can promise you, the magic has just begun. Let's embark on this culinary journey!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely! Harmony and good, healthy meals is the perfect combination. And you, Ethan, are a culinary wizard. I'm very excited about our upcoming culinary journey. Thank you again for your understanding and willingness to adapt to new cooking styles.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates living together and sharing household chores. One of them, who is responsible for cooking, finds out that the other one refuses to eat anything they cook\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Express your concerns about the food without hurting the roommate's feelings (Extra information: you are worried about the taste and nutrition of the food)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Ava, I noticed you've been avoiding my cooking lately. Is there something wrong with it, or perhaps a particular dish you'd like me to prepare instead? I spend a lot of time cooking, it would make me happy knowing that you are enjoying it.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Ethan, I really appreciate everything you do. Your culinary skills are awesome and it's a real treat to see you do your magic in the kitchen. Lately though, I've been trying to focus on a balance of taste and nutrition... not that your cooking isn't nutritious or anything, but I'm trying to explore more dietary options. Maybe we could jump into exploring recipes that are not only tasty but also cover a wide spectrum of nutrients? Anyway, I hope that we could continue sharing meals together, because I enjoy your cooking and our time together.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"I understand, Ava, and I applaud your decision to explore more nutrient-rich options. I enjoy our shared meals too and I wouldn't want that to change. I'm open to this new challenge and I will work on coming up with recipes that are not only flavorful but also balanced in nutrition. Could you tell me more about the type of dietary options you're interested in so that I can tailor my cooking more to your needs?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"That's awesome, Ethan, I'm glad we're on the same page. I've been researching on foods that are high in fibre, antioxidants and vitamins. I'm leaning towards a more plant-based diet, incorporating a lot of fruits, vegetables, whole grains and plant-based proteins. I've also been trying to limit processed food and excess sugar. It'd really mean a lot if you could incorporate some of these categories into the dishes. I don't want to impose my views on you, it's just a personal decision I've made for my health. But I do hope we can continue enjoying meal times together, with a slightly different menu maybe?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"I appreciate your openness, Ava. It's no imposition at all. I'm actually excited about incorporating more plant-based proteins, whole grains, and fresh fruits and vegetables into our meals. As for processed food and sugars, we can definitely cut back on those too. It's a journey we're taking together for better health and I'll make sure to prepare meals that meet your dietary needs. I'm sure we'll continue to enjoy our meal times, and who knows, maybe we'll discover a new favorite dish together!\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, that sounds perfect. I'm really excited for the new dishes we'll discover along this journey. Thank you for being so understanding and open to these changes. Together, we can make our meals enjoyable and healthy. I'm already looking forward to our next meal!\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Ava. It's a pleasure cooking for someone who appreciates it and is interested in trying new things. I'll start experimenting with some nutrient-rich, plant-based recipes. Let's anticipate our next meal!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"I can't wait, Ethan! Your creativity in the kitchen never fails to impress me, and I'm sure that this new direction will be no different. Your willingness to adapt to my dietary needs really means a lot.\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"You're too kind, Ava. It's my pleasure to adapt for you, and I appreciate your enthusiasm about my cooking. I'm sure this new culinary journey will be both exciting and rewarding. Let's make our next meal a memorable one!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"That sounds like a plan, Ethan! I can't wait to see what culinary magic you'll come up with this time. Your willingness to adjust to my suggestions is what makes living together so harmonious.\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Ava. It's all about harmony and enjoying good, healthy meals together, right? I can promise you, the magic has just begun. Let's embark on this culinary journey!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely! Harmony and good, healthy meals is the perfect combination. And you, Ethan, are a culinary wizard. I'm very excited about our upcoming culinary journey. Thank you again for your understanding and willingness to adapt to new cooking styles.\"\n\nTurn #12: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thank you for your kind words, Ava. Your appreciation means a lot to me. I can't wait to start discovering new recipes that meet your dietary preferences. Together, we'll make this culinary journey both healthy and delightful. Let's get started on our next meal!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to divide certain items that they bought together for their apartment. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Ethan Johnson\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. \nMiles Hawkins's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, each book is worth 2 points, each hat is worth 3 points, and the ball is worth 5 points)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Ethan, let's divide these items we bought for the apartment. How about we each pick an item one by one until everything's been chosen?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to divide certain items that they bought together for their apartment. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Ethan Johnson\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. \nMiles Hawkins's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, each book is worth 2 points, each hat is worth 3 points, and the ball is worth 5 points)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Ethan, let's divide these items we bought for the apartment. How about we each pick an item one by one until everything's been chosen?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Sounds like a fair plan, Miles. Why don't we add a little twist to it? How about we assign points to each item based on how much it means to us, and then, we try to maximize those points while picking. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I really like your idea, Ethan! It's definitely going to make things more interesting. As for points, I'd assign 2 points to each book as I am a voracious reader, 3 points to each hat since they're quite fashionable, and 5 points to that ball since it's perfect for working out during breaks. Let's get to picking!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to divide certain items that they bought together for their apartment. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Ethan Johnson\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. \nMiles Hawkins's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, each book is worth 2 points, each hat is worth 3 points, and the ball is worth 5 points)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Ethan, let's divide these items we bought for the apartment. How about we each pick an item one by one until everything's been chosen?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Sounds like a fair plan, Miles. Why don't we add a little twist to it? How about we assign points to each item based on how much it means to us, and then, we try to maximize those points while picking. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"I really like your idea, Ethan! It's definitely going to make things more interesting. As for points, I'd assign 2 points to each book as I am a voracious reader, 3 points to each hat since they're quite fashionable, and 5 points to that ball since it's perfect for working out during breaks. Let's get to picking!\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's great, Miles! I'm fond of books more than you know, so I'd give each book 3 points. The hats are lovely, they have their charm, and I'd give them 2 points each. And the ball, I'd assign it 4 points considering it could be a good stress buster in our cooking breaks.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Good points, Ethan. I suggest we start picking. How about this: you pick first, then we'll alternate?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to divide certain items that they bought together for their apartment. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Ethan Johnson\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. \nMiles Hawkins's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, each book is worth 2 points, each hat is worth 3 points, and the ball is worth 5 points)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Ethan, let's divide these items we bought for the apartment. How about we each pick an item one by one until everything's been chosen?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Sounds like a fair plan, Miles. Why don't we add a little twist to it? How about we assign points to each item based on how much it means to us, and then, we try to maximize those points while picking. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"I really like your idea, Ethan! It's definitely going to make things more interesting. As for points, I'd assign 2 points to each book as I am a voracious reader, 3 points to each hat since they're quite fashionable, and 5 points to that ball since it's perfect for working out during breaks. Let's get to picking!\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's great, Miles! I'm fond of books more than you know, so I'd give each book 3 points. The hats are lovely, they have their charm, and I'd give them 2 points each. And the ball, I'd assign it 4 points considering it could be a good stress buster in our cooking breaks.\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"Good points, Ethan. I suggest we start picking. How about this: you pick first, then we'll alternate?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Perfect! Let's get started. I'll choose one of the books first. I believe that, considering its content, it\u2019ll be a great addition to my collection.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Excellent choice, Ethan, that book is indeed a gem. Now for my turn, I think I'll go for the ball. It really motivates me to squeeze in some workouts between those long cooking sessions.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to divide certain items that they bought together for their apartment. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Ethan Johnson\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. \nMiles Hawkins's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, each book is worth 2 points, each hat is worth 3 points, and the ball is worth 5 points)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Ethan, let's divide these items we bought for the apartment. How about we each pick an item one by one until everything's been chosen?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Sounds like a fair plan, Miles. Why don't we add a little twist to it? How about we assign points to each item based on how much it means to us, and then, we try to maximize those points while picking. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"I really like your idea, Ethan! It's definitely going to make things more interesting. As for points, I'd assign 2 points to each book as I am a voracious reader, 3 points to each hat since they're quite fashionable, and 5 points to that ball since it's perfect for working out during breaks. Let's get to picking!\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's great, Miles! I'm fond of books more than you know, so I'd give each book 3 points. The hats are lovely, they have their charm, and I'd give them 2 points each. And the ball, I'd assign it 4 points considering it could be a good stress buster in our cooking breaks.\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"Good points, Ethan. I suggest we start picking. How about this: you pick first, then we'll alternate?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Perfect! Let's get started. I'll choose one of the books first. I believe that, considering its content, it\u2019ll be a great addition to my collection.\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins said: \"Excellent choice, Ethan, that book is indeed a gem. Now for my turn, I think I'll go for the ball. It really motivates me to squeeze in some workouts between those long cooking sessions.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"I agree, staying active between cooking is a good idea. Now for my turn again, I'll pick another book. Its rich narrative can provide a wonderful escape after a long day at work.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Your passion for books is truly inspiring, Ethan. Now for my turn, given their unique design, I would like to pick one of the hats. It'll be quite a statement piece in the kitchen.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to divide certain items that they bought together for their apartment. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Ethan Johnson\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. \nMiles Hawkins's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, each book is worth 2 points, each hat is worth 3 points, and the ball is worth 5 points)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Ethan, let's divide these items we bought for the apartment. How about we each pick an item one by one until everything's been chosen?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Sounds like a fair plan, Miles. Why don't we add a little twist to it? How about we assign points to each item based on how much it means to us, and then, we try to maximize those points while picking. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"I really like your idea, Ethan! It's definitely going to make things more interesting. As for points, I'd assign 2 points to each book as I am a voracious reader, 3 points to each hat since they're quite fashionable, and 5 points to that ball since it's perfect for working out during breaks. Let's get to picking!\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's great, Miles! I'm fond of books more than you know, so I'd give each book 3 points. The hats are lovely, they have their charm, and I'd give them 2 points each. And the ball, I'd assign it 4 points considering it could be a good stress buster in our cooking breaks.\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"Good points, Ethan. I suggest we start picking. How about this: you pick first, then we'll alternate?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Perfect! Let's get started. I'll choose one of the books first. I believe that, considering its content, it\u2019ll be a great addition to my collection.\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins said: \"Excellent choice, Ethan, that book is indeed a gem. Now for my turn, I think I'll go for the ball. It really motivates me to squeeze in some workouts between those long cooking sessions.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"I agree, staying active between cooking is a good idea. Now for my turn again, I'll pick another book. Its rich narrative can provide a wonderful escape after a long day at work.\"\n\nTurn #8: Miles Hawkins said: \"Your passion for books is truly inspiring, Ethan. Now for my turn, given their unique design, I would like to pick one of the hats. It'll be quite a statement piece in the kitchen.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"You have a unique taste for fashion, Miles. For my next pick, I will take the last book. There's something about immersing oneself in a good story that's incredibly relaxing.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Alright, Ethan. I admire your love for reading. For my next choice, I will take the remaining hat. I believe it's got a style that complements my cooking attire just right.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to divide certain items that they bought together for their apartment. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Ethan Johnson\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. \nMiles Hawkins's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, each book is worth 2 points, each hat is worth 3 points, and the ball is worth 5 points)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Ethan, let's divide these items we bought for the apartment. How about we each pick an item one by one until everything's been chosen?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Sounds like a fair plan, Miles. Why don't we add a little twist to it? How about we assign points to each item based on how much it means to us, and then, we try to maximize those points while picking. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"I really like your idea, Ethan! It's definitely going to make things more interesting. As for points, I'd assign 2 points to each book as I am a voracious reader, 3 points to each hat since they're quite fashionable, and 5 points to that ball since it's perfect for working out during breaks. Let's get to picking!\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's great, Miles! I'm fond of books more than you know, so I'd give each book 3 points. The hats are lovely, they have their charm, and I'd give them 2 points each. And the ball, I'd assign it 4 points considering it could be a good stress buster in our cooking breaks.\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"Good points, Ethan. I suggest we start picking. How about this: you pick first, then we'll alternate?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Perfect! Let's get started. I'll choose one of the books first. I believe that, considering its content, it\u2019ll be a great addition to my collection.\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins said: \"Excellent choice, Ethan, that book is indeed a gem. Now for my turn, I think I'll go for the ball. It really motivates me to squeeze in some workouts between those long cooking sessions.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"I agree, staying active between cooking is a good idea. Now for my turn again, I'll pick another book. Its rich narrative can provide a wonderful escape after a long day at work.\"\n\nTurn #8: Miles Hawkins said: \"Your passion for books is truly inspiring, Ethan. Now for my turn, given their unique design, I would like to pick one of the hats. It'll be quite a statement piece in the kitchen.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"You have a unique taste for fashion, Miles. For my next pick, I will take the last book. There's something about immersing oneself in a good story that's incredibly relaxing.\"\n\nTurn #10: Miles Hawkins said: \"Alright, Ethan. I admire your love for reading. For my next choice, I will take the remaining hat. I believe it's got a style that complements my cooking attire just right.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Johnson said: \"Likewise, I appreciate your eye for fashion, Miles. Considering we're almost through, and keeping with the spirit of fairness, I'll pick up the ball. It's always useful to have around for a few moments of fun amidst our hectic schedules.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Well, Ethan, looks like we've distributed everything quite fairly. I'm glad we could make this fun yet productive. I'm really content with my choices, I hope you are too.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to divide certain items that they bought together for their apartment. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Ethan Johnson\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. \nMiles Hawkins's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, each book is worth 2 points, each hat is worth 3 points, and the ball is worth 5 points)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Ethan, let's divide these items we bought for the apartment. How about we each pick an item one by one until everything's been chosen?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Sounds like a fair plan, Miles. Why don't we add a little twist to it? How about we assign points to each item based on how much it means to us, and then, we try to maximize those points while picking. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"I really like your idea, Ethan! It's definitely going to make things more interesting. As for points, I'd assign 2 points to each book as I am a voracious reader, 3 points to each hat since they're quite fashionable, and 5 points to that ball since it's perfect for working out during breaks. Let's get to picking!\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's great, Miles! I'm fond of books more than you know, so I'd give each book 3 points. The hats are lovely, they have their charm, and I'd give them 2 points each. And the ball, I'd assign it 4 points considering it could be a good stress buster in our cooking breaks.\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"Good points, Ethan. I suggest we start picking. How about this: you pick first, then we'll alternate?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Perfect! Let's get started. I'll choose one of the books first. I believe that, considering its content, it\u2019ll be a great addition to my collection.\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins said: \"Excellent choice, Ethan, that book is indeed a gem. Now for my turn, I think I'll go for the ball. It really motivates me to squeeze in some workouts between those long cooking sessions.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"I agree, staying active between cooking is a good idea. Now for my turn again, I'll pick another book. Its rich narrative can provide a wonderful escape after a long day at work.\"\n\nTurn #8: Miles Hawkins said: \"Your passion for books is truly inspiring, Ethan. Now for my turn, given their unique design, I would like to pick one of the hats. It'll be quite a statement piece in the kitchen.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"You have a unique taste for fashion, Miles. For my next pick, I will take the last book. There's something about immersing oneself in a good story that's incredibly relaxing.\"\n\nTurn #10: Miles Hawkins said: \"Alright, Ethan. I admire your love for reading. For my next choice, I will take the remaining hat. I believe it's got a style that complements my cooking attire just right.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Johnson said: \"Likewise, I appreciate your eye for fashion, Miles. Considering we're almost through, and keeping with the spirit of fairness, I'll pick up the ball. It's always useful to have around for a few moments of fun amidst our hectic schedules.\"\n\nTurn #12: Miles Hawkins said: \"Well, Ethan, looks like we've distributed everything quite fairly. I'm glad we could make this fun yet productive. I'm really content with my choices, I hope you are too.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm more than content, Miles. It was a brilliant idea to assign points and I am glad we managed to keep it interesting, fun, and fair. Looking forward to our next shared collection!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn't agree more, Ethan. Looking forward to our next shared collection indeed. This was an interesting and fair way to split things. Thank you for agreeing to my little gambit.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to divide certain items that they bought together for their apartment. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Ethan Johnson\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. \nMiles Hawkins's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, each book is worth 2 points, each hat is worth 3 points, and the ball is worth 5 points)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Ethan, let's divide these items we bought for the apartment. How about we each pick an item one by one until everything's been chosen?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Sounds like a fair plan, Miles. Why don't we add a little twist to it? How about we assign points to each item based on how much it means to us, and then, we try to maximize those points while picking. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"I really like your idea, Ethan! It's definitely going to make things more interesting. As for points, I'd assign 2 points to each book as I am a voracious reader, 3 points to each hat since they're quite fashionable, and 5 points to that ball since it's perfect for working out during breaks. Let's get to picking!\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's great, Miles! I'm fond of books more than you know, so I'd give each book 3 points. The hats are lovely, they have their charm, and I'd give them 2 points each. And the ball, I'd assign it 4 points considering it could be a good stress buster in our cooking breaks.\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"Good points, Ethan. I suggest we start picking. How about this: you pick first, then we'll alternate?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Perfect! Let's get started. I'll choose one of the books first. I believe that, considering its content, it\u2019ll be a great addition to my collection.\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins said: \"Excellent choice, Ethan, that book is indeed a gem. Now for my turn, I think I'll go for the ball. It really motivates me to squeeze in some workouts between those long cooking sessions.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"I agree, staying active between cooking is a good idea. Now for my turn again, I'll pick another book. Its rich narrative can provide a wonderful escape after a long day at work.\"\n\nTurn #8: Miles Hawkins said: \"Your passion for books is truly inspiring, Ethan. Now for my turn, given their unique design, I would like to pick one of the hats. It'll be quite a statement piece in the kitchen.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"You have a unique taste for fashion, Miles. For my next pick, I will take the last book. There's something about immersing oneself in a good story that's incredibly relaxing.\"\n\nTurn #10: Miles Hawkins said: \"Alright, Ethan. I admire your love for reading. For my next choice, I will take the remaining hat. I believe it's got a style that complements my cooking attire just right.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Johnson said: \"Likewise, I appreciate your eye for fashion, Miles. Considering we're almost through, and keeping with the spirit of fairness, I'll pick up the ball. It's always useful to have around for a few moments of fun amidst our hectic schedules.\"\n\nTurn #12: Miles Hawkins said: \"Well, Ethan, looks like we've distributed everything quite fairly. I'm glad we could make this fun yet productive. I'm really content with my choices, I hope you are too.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm more than content, Miles. It was a brilliant idea to assign points and I am glad we managed to keep it interesting, fun, and fair. Looking forward to our next shared collection!\"\n\nTurn #14: Miles Hawkins said: \"I couldn't agree more, Ethan. Looking forward to our next shared collection indeed. This was an interesting and fair way to split things. Thank you for agreeing to my little gambit.\"\n\nTurn #15: Ethan Johnson said: \"The pleasure was all mine, Miles. This was indeed a fun and fair process. Thank you too for agreeing to my suggestion. Till our next collection adventure!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to divide certain items that they bought together for their apartment. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Ethan Johnson\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, each book is worth 3 points, each hat is worth 2 points, and the ball is worth 4 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Ethan, let's divide these items we bought for the apartment. How about we each pick an item one by one until everything's been chosen?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sounds like a fair plan, Miles. Why don't we add a little twist to it? How about we assign points to each item based on how much it means to us, and then, we try to maximize those points while picking. What do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to divide certain items that they bought together for their apartment. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Ethan Johnson\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, each book is worth 3 points, each hat is worth 2 points, and the ball is worth 4 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Ethan, let's divide these items we bought for the apartment. How about we each pick an item one by one until everything's been chosen?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Sounds like a fair plan, Miles. Why don't we add a little twist to it? How about we assign points to each item based on how much it means to us, and then, we try to maximize those points while picking. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"I really like your idea, Ethan! It's definitely going to make things more interesting. As for points, I'd assign 2 points to each book as I am a voracious reader, 3 points to each hat since they're quite fashionable, and 5 points to that ball since it's perfect for working out during breaks. Let's get to picking!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's great, Miles! I'm fond of books more than you know, so I'd give each book 3 points. The hats are lovely, they have their charm, and I'd give them 2 points each. And the ball, I'd assign it 4 points considering it could be a good stress buster in our cooking breaks.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to divide certain items that they bought together for their apartment. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Ethan Johnson\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, each book is worth 3 points, each hat is worth 2 points, and the ball is worth 4 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Ethan, let's divide these items we bought for the apartment. How about we each pick an item one by one until everything's been chosen?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Sounds like a fair plan, Miles. Why don't we add a little twist to it? How about we assign points to each item based on how much it means to us, and then, we try to maximize those points while picking. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"I really like your idea, Ethan! It's definitely going to make things more interesting. As for points, I'd assign 2 points to each book as I am a voracious reader, 3 points to each hat since they're quite fashionable, and 5 points to that ball since it's perfect for working out during breaks. Let's get to picking!\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's great, Miles! I'm fond of books more than you know, so I'd give each book 3 points. The hats are lovely, they have their charm, and I'd give them 2 points each. And the ball, I'd assign it 4 points considering it could be a good stress buster in our cooking breaks.\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"Good points, Ethan. I suggest we start picking. How about this: you pick first, then we'll alternate?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Perfect! Let's get started. I'll choose one of the books first. I believe that, considering its content, it\u2019ll be a great addition to my collection.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to divide certain items that they bought together for their apartment. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Ethan Johnson\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, each book is worth 3 points, each hat is worth 2 points, and the ball is worth 4 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Ethan, let's divide these items we bought for the apartment. How about we each pick an item one by one until everything's been chosen?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Sounds like a fair plan, Miles. Why don't we add a little twist to it? How about we assign points to each item based on how much it means to us, and then, we try to maximize those points while picking. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"I really like your idea, Ethan! It's definitely going to make things more interesting. As for points, I'd assign 2 points to each book as I am a voracious reader, 3 points to each hat since they're quite fashionable, and 5 points to that ball since it's perfect for working out during breaks. Let's get to picking!\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's great, Miles! I'm fond of books more than you know, so I'd give each book 3 points. The hats are lovely, they have their charm, and I'd give them 2 points each. And the ball, I'd assign it 4 points considering it could be a good stress buster in our cooking breaks.\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"Good points, Ethan. I suggest we start picking. How about this: you pick first, then we'll alternate?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Perfect! Let's get started. I'll choose one of the books first. I believe that, considering its content, it\u2019ll be a great addition to my collection.\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins said: \"Excellent choice, Ethan, that book is indeed a gem. Now for my turn, I think I'll go for the ball. It really motivates me to squeeze in some workouts between those long cooking sessions.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I agree, staying active between cooking is a good idea. Now for my turn again, I'll pick another book. Its rich narrative can provide a wonderful escape after a long day at work.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to divide certain items that they bought together for their apartment. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Ethan Johnson\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, each book is worth 3 points, each hat is worth 2 points, and the ball is worth 4 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Ethan, let's divide these items we bought for the apartment. How about we each pick an item one by one until everything's been chosen?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Sounds like a fair plan, Miles. Why don't we add a little twist to it? How about we assign points to each item based on how much it means to us, and then, we try to maximize those points while picking. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"I really like your idea, Ethan! It's definitely going to make things more interesting. As for points, I'd assign 2 points to each book as I am a voracious reader, 3 points to each hat since they're quite fashionable, and 5 points to that ball since it's perfect for working out during breaks. Let's get to picking!\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's great, Miles! I'm fond of books more than you know, so I'd give each book 3 points. The hats are lovely, they have their charm, and I'd give them 2 points each. And the ball, I'd assign it 4 points considering it could be a good stress buster in our cooking breaks.\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"Good points, Ethan. I suggest we start picking. How about this: you pick first, then we'll alternate?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Perfect! Let's get started. I'll choose one of the books first. I believe that, considering its content, it\u2019ll be a great addition to my collection.\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins said: \"Excellent choice, Ethan, that book is indeed a gem. Now for my turn, I think I'll go for the ball. It really motivates me to squeeze in some workouts between those long cooking sessions.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"I agree, staying active between cooking is a good idea. Now for my turn again, I'll pick another book. Its rich narrative can provide a wonderful escape after a long day at work.\"\n\nTurn #8: Miles Hawkins said: \"Your passion for books is truly inspiring, Ethan. Now for my turn, given their unique design, I would like to pick one of the hats. It'll be quite a statement piece in the kitchen.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You have a unique taste for fashion, Miles. For my next pick, I will take the last book. There's something about immersing oneself in a good story that's incredibly relaxing.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to divide certain items that they bought together for their apartment. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Ethan Johnson\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, each book is worth 3 points, each hat is worth 2 points, and the ball is worth 4 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Ethan, let's divide these items we bought for the apartment. How about we each pick an item one by one until everything's been chosen?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Sounds like a fair plan, Miles. Why don't we add a little twist to it? How about we assign points to each item based on how much it means to us, and then, we try to maximize those points while picking. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"I really like your idea, Ethan! It's definitely going to make things more interesting. As for points, I'd assign 2 points to each book as I am a voracious reader, 3 points to each hat since they're quite fashionable, and 5 points to that ball since it's perfect for working out during breaks. Let's get to picking!\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's great, Miles! I'm fond of books more than you know, so I'd give each book 3 points. The hats are lovely, they have their charm, and I'd give them 2 points each. And the ball, I'd assign it 4 points considering it could be a good stress buster in our cooking breaks.\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"Good points, Ethan. I suggest we start picking. How about this: you pick first, then we'll alternate?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Perfect! Let's get started. I'll choose one of the books first. I believe that, considering its content, it\u2019ll be a great addition to my collection.\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins said: \"Excellent choice, Ethan, that book is indeed a gem. Now for my turn, I think I'll go for the ball. It really motivates me to squeeze in some workouts between those long cooking sessions.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"I agree, staying active between cooking is a good idea. Now for my turn again, I'll pick another book. Its rich narrative can provide a wonderful escape after a long day at work.\"\n\nTurn #8: Miles Hawkins said: \"Your passion for books is truly inspiring, Ethan. Now for my turn, given their unique design, I would like to pick one of the hats. It'll be quite a statement piece in the kitchen.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"You have a unique taste for fashion, Miles. For my next pick, I will take the last book. There's something about immersing oneself in a good story that's incredibly relaxing.\"\n\nTurn #10: Miles Hawkins said: \"Alright, Ethan. I admire your love for reading. For my next choice, I will take the remaining hat. I believe it's got a style that complements my cooking attire just right.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Likewise, I appreciate your eye for fashion, Miles. Considering we're almost through, and keeping with the spirit of fairness, I'll pick up the ball. It's always useful to have around for a few moments of fun amidst our hectic schedules.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to divide certain items that they bought together for their apartment. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Ethan Johnson\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, each book is worth 3 points, each hat is worth 2 points, and the ball is worth 4 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Ethan, let's divide these items we bought for the apartment. How about we each pick an item one by one until everything's been chosen?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Sounds like a fair plan, Miles. Why don't we add a little twist to it? How about we assign points to each item based on how much it means to us, and then, we try to maximize those points while picking. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"I really like your idea, Ethan! It's definitely going to make things more interesting. As for points, I'd assign 2 points to each book as I am a voracious reader, 3 points to each hat since they're quite fashionable, and 5 points to that ball since it's perfect for working out during breaks. Let's get to picking!\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's great, Miles! I'm fond of books more than you know, so I'd give each book 3 points. The hats are lovely, they have their charm, and I'd give them 2 points each. And the ball, I'd assign it 4 points considering it could be a good stress buster in our cooking breaks.\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"Good points, Ethan. I suggest we start picking. How about this: you pick first, then we'll alternate?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Perfect! Let's get started. I'll choose one of the books first. I believe that, considering its content, it\u2019ll be a great addition to my collection.\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins said: \"Excellent choice, Ethan, that book is indeed a gem. Now for my turn, I think I'll go for the ball. It really motivates me to squeeze in some workouts between those long cooking sessions.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"I agree, staying active between cooking is a good idea. Now for my turn again, I'll pick another book. Its rich narrative can provide a wonderful escape after a long day at work.\"\n\nTurn #8: Miles Hawkins said: \"Your passion for books is truly inspiring, Ethan. Now for my turn, given their unique design, I would like to pick one of the hats. It'll be quite a statement piece in the kitchen.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"You have a unique taste for fashion, Miles. For my next pick, I will take the last book. There's something about immersing oneself in a good story that's incredibly relaxing.\"\n\nTurn #10: Miles Hawkins said: \"Alright, Ethan. I admire your love for reading. For my next choice, I will take the remaining hat. I believe it's got a style that complements my cooking attire just right.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Johnson said: \"Likewise, I appreciate your eye for fashion, Miles. Considering we're almost through, and keeping with the spirit of fairness, I'll pick up the ball. It's always useful to have around for a few moments of fun amidst our hectic schedules.\"\n\nTurn #12: Miles Hawkins said: \"Well, Ethan, looks like we've distributed everything quite fairly. I'm glad we could make this fun yet productive. I'm really content with my choices, I hope you are too.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm more than content, Miles. It was a brilliant idea to assign points and I am glad we managed to keep it interesting, fun, and fair. Looking forward to our next shared collection!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to divide certain items that they bought together for their apartment. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Ethan Johnson\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, each book is worth 3 points, each hat is worth 2 points, and the ball is worth 4 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Ethan, let's divide these items we bought for the apartment. How about we each pick an item one by one until everything's been chosen?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Sounds like a fair plan, Miles. Why don't we add a little twist to it? How about we assign points to each item based on how much it means to us, and then, we try to maximize those points while picking. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"I really like your idea, Ethan! It's definitely going to make things more interesting. As for points, I'd assign 2 points to each book as I am a voracious reader, 3 points to each hat since they're quite fashionable, and 5 points to that ball since it's perfect for working out during breaks. Let's get to picking!\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's great, Miles! I'm fond of books more than you know, so I'd give each book 3 points. The hats are lovely, they have their charm, and I'd give them 2 points each. And the ball, I'd assign it 4 points considering it could be a good stress buster in our cooking breaks.\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"Good points, Ethan. I suggest we start picking. How about this: you pick first, then we'll alternate?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Perfect! Let's get started. I'll choose one of the books first. I believe that, considering its content, it\u2019ll be a great addition to my collection.\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins said: \"Excellent choice, Ethan, that book is indeed a gem. Now for my turn, I think I'll go for the ball. It really motivates me to squeeze in some workouts between those long cooking sessions.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"I agree, staying active between cooking is a good idea. Now for my turn again, I'll pick another book. Its rich narrative can provide a wonderful escape after a long day at work.\"\n\nTurn #8: Miles Hawkins said: \"Your passion for books is truly inspiring, Ethan. Now for my turn, given their unique design, I would like to pick one of the hats. It'll be quite a statement piece in the kitchen.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"You have a unique taste for fashion, Miles. For my next pick, I will take the last book. There's something about immersing oneself in a good story that's incredibly relaxing.\"\n\nTurn #10: Miles Hawkins said: \"Alright, Ethan. I admire your love for reading. For my next choice, I will take the remaining hat. I believe it's got a style that complements my cooking attire just right.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Johnson said: \"Likewise, I appreciate your eye for fashion, Miles. Considering we're almost through, and keeping with the spirit of fairness, I'll pick up the ball. It's always useful to have around for a few moments of fun amidst our hectic schedules.\"\n\nTurn #12: Miles Hawkins said: \"Well, Ethan, looks like we've distributed everything quite fairly. I'm glad we could make this fun yet productive. I'm really content with my choices, I hope you are too.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm more than content, Miles. It was a brilliant idea to assign points and I am glad we managed to keep it interesting, fun, and fair. Looking forward to our next shared collection!\"\n\nTurn #14: Miles Hawkins said: \"I couldn't agree more, Ethan. Looking forward to our next shared collection indeed. This was an interesting and fair way to split things. Thank you for agreeing to my little gambit.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'The pleasure was all mine, Miles. This was indeed a fun and fair process. Thank you too for agreeing to my suggestion. Till our next collection adventure!'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to divide certain items that they bought together for their apartment. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Ethan Johnson\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, each book is worth 3 points, each hat is worth 2 points, and the ball is worth 4 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Ethan, let's divide these items we bought for the apartment. How about we each pick an item one by one until everything's been chosen?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Sounds like a fair plan, Miles. Why don't we add a little twist to it? How about we assign points to each item based on how much it means to us, and then, we try to maximize those points while picking. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"I really like your idea, Ethan! It's definitely going to make things more interesting. As for points, I'd assign 2 points to each book as I am a voracious reader, 3 points to each hat since they're quite fashionable, and 5 points to that ball since it's perfect for working out during breaks. Let's get to picking!\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's great, Miles! I'm fond of books more than you know, so I'd give each book 3 points. The hats are lovely, they have their charm, and I'd give them 2 points each. And the ball, I'd assign it 4 points considering it could be a good stress buster in our cooking breaks.\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"Good points, Ethan. I suggest we start picking. How about this: you pick first, then we'll alternate?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Perfect! Let's get started. I'll choose one of the books first. I believe that, considering its content, it\u2019ll be a great addition to my collection.\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins said: \"Excellent choice, Ethan, that book is indeed a gem. Now for my turn, I think I'll go for the ball. It really motivates me to squeeze in some workouts between those long cooking sessions.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"I agree, staying active between cooking is a good idea. Now for my turn again, I'll pick another book. Its rich narrative can provide a wonderful escape after a long day at work.\"\n\nTurn #8: Miles Hawkins said: \"Your passion for books is truly inspiring, Ethan. Now for my turn, given their unique design, I would like to pick one of the hats. It'll be quite a statement piece in the kitchen.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"You have a unique taste for fashion, Miles. For my next pick, I will take the last book. There's something about immersing oneself in a good story that's incredibly relaxing.\"\n\nTurn #10: Miles Hawkins said: \"Alright, Ethan. I admire your love for reading. For my next choice, I will take the remaining hat. I believe it's got a style that complements my cooking attire just right.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Johnson said: \"Likewise, I appreciate your eye for fashion, Miles. Considering we're almost through, and keeping with the spirit of fairness, I'll pick up the ball. It's always useful to have around for a few moments of fun amidst our hectic schedules.\"\n\nTurn #12: Miles Hawkins said: \"Well, Ethan, looks like we've distributed everything quite fairly. I'm glad we could make this fun yet productive. I'm really content with my choices, I hope you are too.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm more than content, Miles. It was a brilliant idea to assign points and I am glad we managed to keep it interesting, fun, and fair. Looking forward to our next shared collection!\"\n\nTurn #14: Miles Hawkins said: \"I couldn't agree more, Ethan. Looking forward to our next shared collection indeed. This was an interesting and fair way to split things. Thank you for agreeing to my little gambit.\"\n\nTurn #15: Ethan Johnson said: \"The pleasure was all mine, Miles. This was indeed a fun and fair process. Thank you too for agreeing to my suggestion. Till our next collection adventure!\"\n\nTurn #16: Miles Hawkins left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Correct the misinformation (Extra information: you are a history buff and have accurate knowledge about the topic being discussed on the channel.)\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I see you're not too pleased with the information being shared by the history channel. I happen to know a lot about this subject. How about I clarify some of the errors for you?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Correct the misinformation (Extra information: you are a history buff and have accurate knowledge about the topic being discussed on the channel.)\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I see you're not too pleased with the information being shared by the history channel. I happen to know a lot about this subject. How about I clarify some of the errors for you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Oh, thank you, Naomi. You're such a knowledge mine. I'm sure there may be some inaccuracies, but I'm just really enjoying how they narrate the events. Feel free to point out some of the glaring errors though, I'm all ears!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Sure, Lena. Well, just as a start, they misinterpreted the Battle of Waterloo in the Napoleonic Wars. They stated that it was Napoleon Bonaparte who won the battle, but in reality, it was the combined forces of the Seventh Coalition, led by the Duke of Wellington, that defeated Napoleon.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Correct the misinformation (Extra information: you are a history buff and have accurate knowledge about the topic being discussed on the channel.)\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I see you're not too pleased with the information being shared by the history channel. I happen to know a lot about this subject. How about I clarify some of the errors for you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Oh, thank you, Naomi. You're such a knowledge mine. I'm sure there may be some inaccuracies, but I'm just really enjoying how they narrate the events. Feel free to point out some of the glaring errors though, I'm all ears!\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Sure, Lena. Well, just as a start, they misinterpreted the Battle of Waterloo in the Napoleonic Wars. They stated that it was Napoleon Bonaparte who won the battle, but in reality, it was the combined forces of the Seventh Coalition, led by the Duke of Wellington, that defeated Napoleon.\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"Wow, it's quite fascinating to learn that, Naomi. Can you imagine how things would have been if Napoleon had actually won the Battle of Waterloo? I still enjoy the storytelling aspect, though, even if some details are off.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, considering hypotheticals like that can be quite intriguing. If Napoleon had won the Battle of Waterloo, the course of European history might've taken a different turn. But back to corrections, they also misrepresented the Middle Ages as being completely devoid of scientific progress, referring to it as the 'Dark Ages'. However, contrary to popular belief, there were numerous scientific and technological advancements during this period. Nevertheless, you're right Lena, the storytelling aspect does add a unique charm to it!\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"That's really insightful, Naomi. I find it so interesting that we often have these preset notions about periods in history, like the 'Dark Ages', which are not entirely accurate. Learn something new every day, right? Anyway, I'm really enjoying our 'enhanced' history experience thanks to your knowledge!\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm glad you're finding value in these corrections. History isn't always narrated as accurately as we'd like. Learning history is a continuous process, and it's great when we can enhance that experience together. I'll keep chiming in so we can learn and enjoy the show together!\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"Absolutely. I truly appreciate you sharing your fascinating insights, Naomi. It's making this already captivating show even more enthralling for me. Let's continue watching and learning together.\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm happy you're enjoying the journey as much as I do, Lena. Let's keep on with our 'enhanced' history channel experience. I can't wait to see what other historical events they cover and, of course, clarify any inaccuracies they might overlook.\"\n\nTurn #9: Lena Goodwin said: \"That sounds like a splendid idea, Naomi. I'm ready for whatever historical journey they are going to take us on next. And remember, no detail is too small to overlook in our 'enhanced' watching experience. Play on!\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm thrilled to hear that, Lena! Alright, let's keep the historical journey going. Here's to learning and debunking history together.\"\n\nTurn #11: Lena Goodwin said: \"Here's to new discoveries, Naomi! I'm having a great time watching and learning. Let's go on this historical journey, and let those stories unfold in front of us!\"\n\nTurn #12: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I couldn't agree more, Lena! Let's unriddle those stories. It's always a joy sharing these moments with you. Now, on to the next chapter of history!\"\n\nTurn #13: Lena Goodwin said: \"I couldn't agree more, Naomi. It's been a delight to learn from you while enjoying the storytelling. On to the next chapter of history indeed!\"\n\nTurn #14: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm glad to share this experience with you too, Lena. Alright then, let's dive into the next chapter of history. Here we go!\"\n\nTurn #15: Lena Goodwin said: \"Absolutely, Naomi. I'm eager to see what we will discover in the next chapter! Let's dive right in.\"\n\nTurn #16: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Definitely, Lena. Let's uncover the next historical mystery! I'm thrilled to continue this learning journey with you.\"\n\nTurn #17: Lena Goodwin said: \"Indeed! Let's continue this fascinating journey through history together, Naomi. I can't wait to see what's next!\"\n\nTurn #18: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Great! Let's see what the history channel has in store for us next, Lena. I'm sure it will be another illuminating episode. Ready when you are!\"\n\nTurn #19: Lena Goodwin said: \"I'm ready as well, Naomi. Bring on the interesting historical facts and misunderstandings as we dive deeper into the labyrinth of history!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #20. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Alright, Lena. Let's embark on this fascinating historical exploration, eager to correct any inaccuracies along the way. Here we go!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Correct the misinformation (Extra information: you are a history buff and have accurate knowledge about the topic being discussed on the channel.)\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I see you're not too pleased with the information being shared by the history channel. I happen to know a lot about this subject. How about I clarify some of the errors for you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Oh, thank you, Naomi. You're such a knowledge mine. I'm sure there may be some inaccuracies, but I'm just really enjoying how they narrate the events. Feel free to point out some of the glaring errors though, I'm all ears!\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Sure, Lena. Well, just as a start, they misinterpreted the Battle of Waterloo in the Napoleonic Wars. They stated that it was Napoleon Bonaparte who won the battle, but in reality, it was the combined forces of the Seventh Coalition, led by the Duke of Wellington, that defeated Napoleon.\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"Wow, it's quite fascinating to learn that, Naomi. Can you imagine how things would have been if Napoleon had actually won the Battle of Waterloo? I still enjoy the storytelling aspect, though, even if some details are off.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, considering hypotheticals like that can be quite intriguing. If Napoleon had won the Battle of Waterloo, the course of European history might've taken a different turn. But back to corrections, they also misrepresented the Middle Ages as being completely devoid of scientific progress, referring to it as the 'Dark Ages'. However, contrary to popular belief, there were numerous scientific and technological advancements during this period. Nevertheless, you're right Lena, the storytelling aspect does add a unique charm to it!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Correct the misinformation (Extra information: you are a history buff and have accurate knowledge about the topic being discussed on the channel.)\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I see you're not too pleased with the information being shared by the history channel. I happen to know a lot about this subject. How about I clarify some of the errors for you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Oh, thank you, Naomi. You're such a knowledge mine. I'm sure there may be some inaccuracies, but I'm just really enjoying how they narrate the events. Feel free to point out some of the glaring errors though, I'm all ears!\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Sure, Lena. Well, just as a start, they misinterpreted the Battle of Waterloo in the Napoleonic Wars. They stated that it was Napoleon Bonaparte who won the battle, but in reality, it was the combined forces of the Seventh Coalition, led by the Duke of Wellington, that defeated Napoleon.\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"Wow, it's quite fascinating to learn that, Naomi. Can you imagine how things would have been if Napoleon had actually won the Battle of Waterloo? I still enjoy the storytelling aspect, though, even if some details are off.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, considering hypotheticals like that can be quite intriguing. If Napoleon had won the Battle of Waterloo, the course of European history might've taken a different turn. But back to corrections, they also misrepresented the Middle Ages as being completely devoid of scientific progress, referring to it as the 'Dark Ages'. However, contrary to popular belief, there were numerous scientific and technological advancements during this period. Nevertheless, you're right Lena, the storytelling aspect does add a unique charm to it!\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"That's really insightful, Naomi. I find it so interesting that we often have these preset notions about periods in history, like the 'Dark Ages', which are not entirely accurate. Learn something new every day, right? Anyway, I'm really enjoying our 'enhanced' history experience thanks to your knowledge!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad you're finding value in these corrections. History isn't always narrated as accurately as we'd like. Learning history is a continuous process, and it's great when we can enhance that experience together. I'll keep chiming in so we can learn and enjoy the show together!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Correct the misinformation (Extra information: you are a history buff and have accurate knowledge about the topic being discussed on the channel.)\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I see you're not too pleased with the information being shared by the history channel. I happen to know a lot about this subject. How about I clarify some of the errors for you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Oh, thank you, Naomi. You're such a knowledge mine. I'm sure there may be some inaccuracies, but I'm just really enjoying how they narrate the events. Feel free to point out some of the glaring errors though, I'm all ears!\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Sure, Lena. Well, just as a start, they misinterpreted the Battle of Waterloo in the Napoleonic Wars. They stated that it was Napoleon Bonaparte who won the battle, but in reality, it was the combined forces of the Seventh Coalition, led by the Duke of Wellington, that defeated Napoleon.\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"Wow, it's quite fascinating to learn that, Naomi. Can you imagine how things would have been if Napoleon had actually won the Battle of Waterloo? I still enjoy the storytelling aspect, though, even if some details are off.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, considering hypotheticals like that can be quite intriguing. If Napoleon had won the Battle of Waterloo, the course of European history might've taken a different turn. But back to corrections, they also misrepresented the Middle Ages as being completely devoid of scientific progress, referring to it as the 'Dark Ages'. However, contrary to popular belief, there were numerous scientific and technological advancements during this period. Nevertheless, you're right Lena, the storytelling aspect does add a unique charm to it!\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"That's really insightful, Naomi. I find it so interesting that we often have these preset notions about periods in history, like the 'Dark Ages', which are not entirely accurate. Learn something new every day, right? Anyway, I'm really enjoying our 'enhanced' history experience thanks to your knowledge!\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm glad you're finding value in these corrections. History isn't always narrated as accurately as we'd like. Learning history is a continuous process, and it's great when we can enhance that experience together. I'll keep chiming in so we can learn and enjoy the show together!\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"Absolutely. I truly appreciate you sharing your fascinating insights, Naomi. It's making this already captivating show even more enthralling for me. Let's continue watching and learning together.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm happy you're enjoying the journey as much as I do, Lena. Let's keep on with our 'enhanced' history channel experience. I can't wait to see what other historical events they cover and, of course, clarify any inaccuracies they might overlook.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Correct the misinformation (Extra information: you are a history buff and have accurate knowledge about the topic being discussed on the channel.)\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I see you're not too pleased with the information being shared by the history channel. I happen to know a lot about this subject. How about I clarify some of the errors for you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Oh, thank you, Naomi. You're such a knowledge mine. I'm sure there may be some inaccuracies, but I'm just really enjoying how they narrate the events. Feel free to point out some of the glaring errors though, I'm all ears!\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Sure, Lena. Well, just as a start, they misinterpreted the Battle of Waterloo in the Napoleonic Wars. They stated that it was Napoleon Bonaparte who won the battle, but in reality, it was the combined forces of the Seventh Coalition, led by the Duke of Wellington, that defeated Napoleon.\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"Wow, it's quite fascinating to learn that, Naomi. Can you imagine how things would have been if Napoleon had actually won the Battle of Waterloo? I still enjoy the storytelling aspect, though, even if some details are off.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, considering hypotheticals like that can be quite intriguing. If Napoleon had won the Battle of Waterloo, the course of European history might've taken a different turn. But back to corrections, they also misrepresented the Middle Ages as being completely devoid of scientific progress, referring to it as the 'Dark Ages'. However, contrary to popular belief, there were numerous scientific and technological advancements during this period. Nevertheless, you're right Lena, the storytelling aspect does add a unique charm to it!\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"That's really insightful, Naomi. I find it so interesting that we often have these preset notions about periods in history, like the 'Dark Ages', which are not entirely accurate. Learn something new every day, right? Anyway, I'm really enjoying our 'enhanced' history experience thanks to your knowledge!\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm glad you're finding value in these corrections. History isn't always narrated as accurately as we'd like. Learning history is a continuous process, and it's great when we can enhance that experience together. I'll keep chiming in so we can learn and enjoy the show together!\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"Absolutely. I truly appreciate you sharing your fascinating insights, Naomi. It's making this already captivating show even more enthralling for me. Let's continue watching and learning together.\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm happy you're enjoying the journey as much as I do, Lena. Let's keep on with our 'enhanced' history channel experience. I can't wait to see what other historical events they cover and, of course, clarify any inaccuracies they might overlook.\"\n\nTurn #9: Lena Goodwin said: \"That sounds like a splendid idea, Naomi. I'm ready for whatever historical journey they are going to take us on next. And remember, no detail is too small to overlook in our 'enhanced' watching experience. Play on!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm thrilled to hear that, Lena! Alright, let's keep the historical journey going. Here's to learning and debunking history together.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Correct the misinformation (Extra information: you are a history buff and have accurate knowledge about the topic being discussed on the channel.)\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I see you're not too pleased with the information being shared by the history channel. I happen to know a lot about this subject. How about I clarify some of the errors for you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Oh, thank you, Naomi. You're such a knowledge mine. I'm sure there may be some inaccuracies, but I'm just really enjoying how they narrate the events. Feel free to point out some of the glaring errors though, I'm all ears!\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Sure, Lena. Well, just as a start, they misinterpreted the Battle of Waterloo in the Napoleonic Wars. They stated that it was Napoleon Bonaparte who won the battle, but in reality, it was the combined forces of the Seventh Coalition, led by the Duke of Wellington, that defeated Napoleon.\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"Wow, it's quite fascinating to learn that, Naomi. Can you imagine how things would have been if Napoleon had actually won the Battle of Waterloo? I still enjoy the storytelling aspect, though, even if some details are off.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, considering hypotheticals like that can be quite intriguing. If Napoleon had won the Battle of Waterloo, the course of European history might've taken a different turn. But back to corrections, they also misrepresented the Middle Ages as being completely devoid of scientific progress, referring to it as the 'Dark Ages'. However, contrary to popular belief, there were numerous scientific and technological advancements during this period. Nevertheless, you're right Lena, the storytelling aspect does add a unique charm to it!\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"That's really insightful, Naomi. I find it so interesting that we often have these preset notions about periods in history, like the 'Dark Ages', which are not entirely accurate. Learn something new every day, right? Anyway, I'm really enjoying our 'enhanced' history experience thanks to your knowledge!\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm glad you're finding value in these corrections. History isn't always narrated as accurately as we'd like. Learning history is a continuous process, and it's great when we can enhance that experience together. I'll keep chiming in so we can learn and enjoy the show together!\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"Absolutely. I truly appreciate you sharing your fascinating insights, Naomi. It's making this already captivating show even more enthralling for me. Let's continue watching and learning together.\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm happy you're enjoying the journey as much as I do, Lena. Let's keep on with our 'enhanced' history channel experience. I can't wait to see what other historical events they cover and, of course, clarify any inaccuracies they might overlook.\"\n\nTurn #9: Lena Goodwin said: \"That sounds like a splendid idea, Naomi. I'm ready for whatever historical journey they are going to take us on next. And remember, no detail is too small to overlook in our 'enhanced' watching experience. Play on!\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm thrilled to hear that, Lena! Alright, let's keep the historical journey going. Here's to learning and debunking history together.\"\n\nTurn #11: Lena Goodwin said: \"Here's to new discoveries, Naomi! I'm having a great time watching and learning. Let's go on this historical journey, and let those stories unfold in front of us!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn't agree more, Lena! Let's unriddle those stories. It's always a joy sharing these moments with you. Now, on to the next chapter of history!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Correct the misinformation (Extra information: you are a history buff and have accurate knowledge about the topic being discussed on the channel.)\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I see you're not too pleased with the information being shared by the history channel. I happen to know a lot about this subject. How about I clarify some of the errors for you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Oh, thank you, Naomi. You're such a knowledge mine. I'm sure there may be some inaccuracies, but I'm just really enjoying how they narrate the events. Feel free to point out some of the glaring errors though, I'm all ears!\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Sure, Lena. Well, just as a start, they misinterpreted the Battle of Waterloo in the Napoleonic Wars. They stated that it was Napoleon Bonaparte who won the battle, but in reality, it was the combined forces of the Seventh Coalition, led by the Duke of Wellington, that defeated Napoleon.\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"Wow, it's quite fascinating to learn that, Naomi. Can you imagine how things would have been if Napoleon had actually won the Battle of Waterloo? I still enjoy the storytelling aspect, though, even if some details are off.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, considering hypotheticals like that can be quite intriguing. If Napoleon had won the Battle of Waterloo, the course of European history might've taken a different turn. But back to corrections, they also misrepresented the Middle Ages as being completely devoid of scientific progress, referring to it as the 'Dark Ages'. However, contrary to popular belief, there were numerous scientific and technological advancements during this period. Nevertheless, you're right Lena, the storytelling aspect does add a unique charm to it!\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"That's really insightful, Naomi. I find it so interesting that we often have these preset notions about periods in history, like the 'Dark Ages', which are not entirely accurate. Learn something new every day, right? Anyway, I'm really enjoying our 'enhanced' history experience thanks to your knowledge!\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm glad you're finding value in these corrections. History isn't always narrated as accurately as we'd like. Learning history is a continuous process, and it's great when we can enhance that experience together. I'll keep chiming in so we can learn and enjoy the show together!\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"Absolutely. I truly appreciate you sharing your fascinating insights, Naomi. It's making this already captivating show even more enthralling for me. Let's continue watching and learning together.\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm happy you're enjoying the journey as much as I do, Lena. Let's keep on with our 'enhanced' history channel experience. I can't wait to see what other historical events they cover and, of course, clarify any inaccuracies they might overlook.\"\n\nTurn #9: Lena Goodwin said: \"That sounds like a splendid idea, Naomi. I'm ready for whatever historical journey they are going to take us on next. And remember, no detail is too small to overlook in our 'enhanced' watching experience. Play on!\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm thrilled to hear that, Lena! Alright, let's keep the historical journey going. Here's to learning and debunking history together.\"\n\nTurn #11: Lena Goodwin said: \"Here's to new discoveries, Naomi! I'm having a great time watching and learning. Let's go on this historical journey, and let those stories unfold in front of us!\"\n\nTurn #12: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I couldn't agree more, Lena! Let's unriddle those stories. It's always a joy sharing these moments with you. Now, on to the next chapter of history!\"\n\nTurn #13: Lena Goodwin said: \"I couldn't agree more, Naomi. It's been a delight to learn from you while enjoying the storytelling. On to the next chapter of history indeed!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad to share this experience with you too, Lena. Alright then, let's dive into the next chapter of history. Here we go!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Correct the misinformation (Extra information: you are a history buff and have accurate knowledge about the topic being discussed on the channel.)\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I see you're not too pleased with the information being shared by the history channel. I happen to know a lot about this subject. How about I clarify some of the errors for you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Oh, thank you, Naomi. You're such a knowledge mine. I'm sure there may be some inaccuracies, but I'm just really enjoying how they narrate the events. Feel free to point out some of the glaring errors though, I'm all ears!\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Sure, Lena. Well, just as a start, they misinterpreted the Battle of Waterloo in the Napoleonic Wars. They stated that it was Napoleon Bonaparte who won the battle, but in reality, it was the combined forces of the Seventh Coalition, led by the Duke of Wellington, that defeated Napoleon.\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"Wow, it's quite fascinating to learn that, Naomi. Can you imagine how things would have been if Napoleon had actually won the Battle of Waterloo? I still enjoy the storytelling aspect, though, even if some details are off.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, considering hypotheticals like that can be quite intriguing. If Napoleon had won the Battle of Waterloo, the course of European history might've taken a different turn. But back to corrections, they also misrepresented the Middle Ages as being completely devoid of scientific progress, referring to it as the 'Dark Ages'. However, contrary to popular belief, there were numerous scientific and technological advancements during this period. Nevertheless, you're right Lena, the storytelling aspect does add a unique charm to it!\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"That's really insightful, Naomi. I find it so interesting that we often have these preset notions about periods in history, like the 'Dark Ages', which are not entirely accurate. Learn something new every day, right? Anyway, I'm really enjoying our 'enhanced' history experience thanks to your knowledge!\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm glad you're finding value in these corrections. History isn't always narrated as accurately as we'd like. Learning history is a continuous process, and it's great when we can enhance that experience together. I'll keep chiming in so we can learn and enjoy the show together!\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"Absolutely. I truly appreciate you sharing your fascinating insights, Naomi. It's making this already captivating show even more enthralling for me. Let's continue watching and learning together.\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm happy you're enjoying the journey as much as I do, Lena. Let's keep on with our 'enhanced' history channel experience. I can't wait to see what other historical events they cover and, of course, clarify any inaccuracies they might overlook.\"\n\nTurn #9: Lena Goodwin said: \"That sounds like a splendid idea, Naomi. I'm ready for whatever historical journey they are going to take us on next. And remember, no detail is too small to overlook in our 'enhanced' watching experience. Play on!\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm thrilled to hear that, Lena! Alright, let's keep the historical journey going. Here's to learning and debunking history together.\"\n\nTurn #11: Lena Goodwin said: \"Here's to new discoveries, Naomi! I'm having a great time watching and learning. Let's go on this historical journey, and let those stories unfold in front of us!\"\n\nTurn #12: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I couldn't agree more, Lena! Let's unriddle those stories. It's always a joy sharing these moments with you. Now, on to the next chapter of history!\"\n\nTurn #13: Lena Goodwin said: \"I couldn't agree more, Naomi. It's been a delight to learn from you while enjoying the storytelling. On to the next chapter of history indeed!\"\n\nTurn #14: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm glad to share this experience with you too, Lena. Alright then, let's dive into the next chapter of history. Here we go!\"\n\nTurn #15: Lena Goodwin said: \"Absolutely, Naomi. I'm eager to see what we will discover in the next chapter! Let's dive right in.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Definitely, Lena. Let's uncover the next historical mystery! I'm thrilled to continue this learning journey with you.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Correct the misinformation (Extra information: you are a history buff and have accurate knowledge about the topic being discussed on the channel.)\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I see you're not too pleased with the information being shared by the history channel. I happen to know a lot about this subject. How about I clarify some of the errors for you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Oh, thank you, Naomi. You're such a knowledge mine. I'm sure there may be some inaccuracies, but I'm just really enjoying how they narrate the events. Feel free to point out some of the glaring errors though, I'm all ears!\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Sure, Lena. Well, just as a start, they misinterpreted the Battle of Waterloo in the Napoleonic Wars. They stated that it was Napoleon Bonaparte who won the battle, but in reality, it was the combined forces of the Seventh Coalition, led by the Duke of Wellington, that defeated Napoleon.\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"Wow, it's quite fascinating to learn that, Naomi. Can you imagine how things would have been if Napoleon had actually won the Battle of Waterloo? I still enjoy the storytelling aspect, though, even if some details are off.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, considering hypotheticals like that can be quite intriguing. If Napoleon had won the Battle of Waterloo, the course of European history might've taken a different turn. But back to corrections, they also misrepresented the Middle Ages as being completely devoid of scientific progress, referring to it as the 'Dark Ages'. However, contrary to popular belief, there were numerous scientific and technological advancements during this period. Nevertheless, you're right Lena, the storytelling aspect does add a unique charm to it!\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"That's really insightful, Naomi. I find it so interesting that we often have these preset notions about periods in history, like the 'Dark Ages', which are not entirely accurate. Learn something new every day, right? Anyway, I'm really enjoying our 'enhanced' history experience thanks to your knowledge!\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm glad you're finding value in these corrections. History isn't always narrated as accurately as we'd like. Learning history is a continuous process, and it's great when we can enhance that experience together. I'll keep chiming in so we can learn and enjoy the show together!\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"Absolutely. I truly appreciate you sharing your fascinating insights, Naomi. It's making this already captivating show even more enthralling for me. Let's continue watching and learning together.\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm happy you're enjoying the journey as much as I do, Lena. Let's keep on with our 'enhanced' history channel experience. I can't wait to see what other historical events they cover and, of course, clarify any inaccuracies they might overlook.\"\n\nTurn #9: Lena Goodwin said: \"That sounds like a splendid idea, Naomi. I'm ready for whatever historical journey they are going to take us on next. And remember, no detail is too small to overlook in our 'enhanced' watching experience. Play on!\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm thrilled to hear that, Lena! Alright, let's keep the historical journey going. Here's to learning and debunking history together.\"\n\nTurn #11: Lena Goodwin said: \"Here's to new discoveries, Naomi! I'm having a great time watching and learning. Let's go on this historical journey, and let those stories unfold in front of us!\"\n\nTurn #12: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I couldn't agree more, Lena! Let's unriddle those stories. It's always a joy sharing these moments with you. Now, on to the next chapter of history!\"\n\nTurn #13: Lena Goodwin said: \"I couldn't agree more, Naomi. It's been a delight to learn from you while enjoying the storytelling. On to the next chapter of history indeed!\"\n\nTurn #14: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm glad to share this experience with you too, Lena. Alright then, let's dive into the next chapter of history. Here we go!\"\n\nTurn #15: Lena Goodwin said: \"Absolutely, Naomi. I'm eager to see what we will discover in the next chapter! Let's dive right in.\"\n\nTurn #16: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Definitely, Lena. Let's uncover the next historical mystery! I'm thrilled to continue this learning journey with you.\"\n\nTurn #17: Lena Goodwin said: \"Indeed! Let's continue this fascinating journey through history together, Naomi. I can't wait to see what's next!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #18. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Great! Let's see what the history channel has in store for us next, Lena. I'm sure it will be another illuminating episode. Ready when you are!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: Don't ruin the enjoyable TV watching experience but also acknowledge the friend's knowledge (Extra information: you are not much interested in history but enjoy the channel's presentation style and don't want the enjoyment to be ruined.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I see you're not too pleased with the information being shared by the history channel. I happen to know a lot about this subject. How about I clarify some of the errors for you?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oh, thank you, Naomi. You're such a knowledge mine. I'm sure there may be some inaccuracies, but I'm just really enjoying how they narrate the events. Feel free to point out some of the glaring errors though, I'm all ears!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: Don't ruin the enjoyable TV watching experience but also acknowledge the friend's knowledge (Extra information: you are not much interested in history but enjoy the channel's presentation style and don't want the enjoyment to be ruined.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I see you're not too pleased with the information being shared by the history channel. I happen to know a lot about this subject. How about I clarify some of the errors for you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Oh, thank you, Naomi. You're such a knowledge mine. I'm sure there may be some inaccuracies, but I'm just really enjoying how they narrate the events. Feel free to point out some of the glaring errors though, I'm all ears!\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Sure, Lena. Well, just as a start, they misinterpreted the Battle of Waterloo in the Napoleonic Wars. They stated that it was Napoleon Bonaparte who won the battle, but in reality, it was the combined forces of the Seventh Coalition, led by the Duke of Wellington, that defeated Napoleon.\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"Wow, it's quite fascinating to learn that, Naomi. Can you imagine how things would have been if Napoleon had actually won the Battle of Waterloo? I still enjoy the storytelling aspect, though, even if some details are off.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, considering hypotheticals like that can be quite intriguing. If Napoleon had won the Battle of Waterloo, the course of European history might've taken a different turn. But back to corrections, they also misrepresented the Middle Ages as being completely devoid of scientific progress, referring to it as the 'Dark Ages'. However, contrary to popular belief, there were numerous scientific and technological advancements during this period. Nevertheless, you're right Lena, the storytelling aspect does add a unique charm to it!\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"That's really insightful, Naomi. I find it so interesting that we often have these preset notions about periods in history, like the 'Dark Ages', which are not entirely accurate. Learn something new every day, right? Anyway, I'm really enjoying our 'enhanced' history experience thanks to your knowledge!\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm glad you're finding value in these corrections. History isn't always narrated as accurately as we'd like. Learning history is a continuous process, and it's great when we can enhance that experience together. I'll keep chiming in so we can learn and enjoy the show together!\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"Absolutely. I truly appreciate you sharing your fascinating insights, Naomi. It's making this already captivating show even more enthralling for me. Let's continue watching and learning together.\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm happy you're enjoying the journey as much as I do, Lena. Let's keep on with our 'enhanced' history channel experience. I can't wait to see what other historical events they cover and, of course, clarify any inaccuracies they might overlook.\"\n\nTurn #9: Lena Goodwin said: \"That sounds like a splendid idea, Naomi. I'm ready for whatever historical journey they are going to take us on next. And remember, no detail is too small to overlook in our 'enhanced' watching experience. Play on!\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm thrilled to hear that, Lena! Alright, let's keep the historical journey going. Here's to learning and debunking history together.\"\n\nTurn #11: Lena Goodwin said: \"Here's to new discoveries, Naomi! I'm having a great time watching and learning. Let's go on this historical journey, and let those stories unfold in front of us!\"\n\nTurn #12: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I couldn't agree more, Lena! Let's unriddle those stories. It's always a joy sharing these moments with you. Now, on to the next chapter of history!\"\n\nTurn #13: Lena Goodwin said: \"I couldn't agree more, Naomi. It's been a delight to learn from you while enjoying the storytelling. On to the next chapter of history indeed!\"\n\nTurn #14: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm glad to share this experience with you too, Lena. Alright then, let's dive into the next chapter of history. Here we go!\"\n\nTurn #15: Lena Goodwin said: \"Absolutely, Naomi. I'm eager to see what we will discover in the next chapter! Let's dive right in.\"\n\nTurn #16: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Definitely, Lena. Let's uncover the next historical mystery! I'm thrilled to continue this learning journey with you.\"\n\nTurn #17: Lena Goodwin said: \"Indeed! Let's continue this fascinating journey through history together, Naomi. I can't wait to see what's next!\"\n\nTurn #18: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Great! Let's see what the history channel has in store for us next, Lena. I'm sure it will be another illuminating episode. Ready when you are!\"\n\nTurn #19: Lena Goodwin said: \"I'm ready as well, Naomi. Bring on the interesting historical facts and misunderstandings as we dive deeper into the labyrinth of history!\"\n\nTurn #20: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Alright, Lena. Let's embark on this fascinating historical exploration, eager to correct any inaccuracies along the way. Here we go!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #21. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: Don't ruin the enjoyable TV watching experience but also acknowledge the friend's knowledge (Extra information: you are not much interested in history but enjoy the channel's presentation style and don't want the enjoyment to be ruined.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I see you're not too pleased with the information being shared by the history channel. I happen to know a lot about this subject. How about I clarify some of the errors for you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Oh, thank you, Naomi. You're such a knowledge mine. I'm sure there may be some inaccuracies, but I'm just really enjoying how they narrate the events. Feel free to point out some of the glaring errors though, I'm all ears!\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Sure, Lena. Well, just as a start, they misinterpreted the Battle of Waterloo in the Napoleonic Wars. They stated that it was Napoleon Bonaparte who won the battle, but in reality, it was the combined forces of the Seventh Coalition, led by the Duke of Wellington, that defeated Napoleon.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Wow, it's quite fascinating to learn that, Naomi. Can you imagine how things would have been if Napoleon had actually won the Battle of Waterloo? I still enjoy the storytelling aspect, though, even if some details are off.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: Don't ruin the enjoyable TV watching experience but also acknowledge the friend's knowledge (Extra information: you are not much interested in history but enjoy the channel's presentation style and don't want the enjoyment to be ruined.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I see you're not too pleased with the information being shared by the history channel. I happen to know a lot about this subject. How about I clarify some of the errors for you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Oh, thank you, Naomi. You're such a knowledge mine. I'm sure there may be some inaccuracies, but I'm just really enjoying how they narrate the events. Feel free to point out some of the glaring errors though, I'm all ears!\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Sure, Lena. Well, just as a start, they misinterpreted the Battle of Waterloo in the Napoleonic Wars. They stated that it was Napoleon Bonaparte who won the battle, but in reality, it was the combined forces of the Seventh Coalition, led by the Duke of Wellington, that defeated Napoleon.\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"Wow, it's quite fascinating to learn that, Naomi. Can you imagine how things would have been if Napoleon had actually won the Battle of Waterloo? I still enjoy the storytelling aspect, though, even if some details are off.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, considering hypotheticals like that can be quite intriguing. If Napoleon had won the Battle of Waterloo, the course of European history might've taken a different turn. But back to corrections, they also misrepresented the Middle Ages as being completely devoid of scientific progress, referring to it as the 'Dark Ages'. However, contrary to popular belief, there were numerous scientific and technological advancements during this period. Nevertheless, you're right Lena, the storytelling aspect does add a unique charm to it!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's really insightful, Naomi. I find it so interesting that we often have these preset notions about periods in history, like the 'Dark Ages', which are not entirely accurate. Learn something new every day, right? Anyway, I'm really enjoying our 'enhanced' history experience thanks to your knowledge!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: Don't ruin the enjoyable TV watching experience but also acknowledge the friend's knowledge (Extra information: you are not much interested in history but enjoy the channel's presentation style and don't want the enjoyment to be ruined.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I see you're not too pleased with the information being shared by the history channel. I happen to know a lot about this subject. How about I clarify some of the errors for you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Oh, thank you, Naomi. You're such a knowledge mine. I'm sure there may be some inaccuracies, but I'm just really enjoying how they narrate the events. Feel free to point out some of the glaring errors though, I'm all ears!\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Sure, Lena. Well, just as a start, they misinterpreted the Battle of Waterloo in the Napoleonic Wars. They stated that it was Napoleon Bonaparte who won the battle, but in reality, it was the combined forces of the Seventh Coalition, led by the Duke of Wellington, that defeated Napoleon.\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"Wow, it's quite fascinating to learn that, Naomi. Can you imagine how things would have been if Napoleon had actually won the Battle of Waterloo? I still enjoy the storytelling aspect, though, even if some details are off.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, considering hypotheticals like that can be quite intriguing. If Napoleon had won the Battle of Waterloo, the course of European history might've taken a different turn. But back to corrections, they also misrepresented the Middle Ages as being completely devoid of scientific progress, referring to it as the 'Dark Ages'. However, contrary to popular belief, there were numerous scientific and technological advancements during this period. Nevertheless, you're right Lena, the storytelling aspect does add a unique charm to it!\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"That's really insightful, Naomi. I find it so interesting that we often have these preset notions about periods in history, like the 'Dark Ages', which are not entirely accurate. Learn something new every day, right? Anyway, I'm really enjoying our 'enhanced' history experience thanks to your knowledge!\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm glad you're finding value in these corrections. History isn't always narrated as accurately as we'd like. Learning history is a continuous process, and it's great when we can enhance that experience together. I'll keep chiming in so we can learn and enjoy the show together!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely. I truly appreciate you sharing your fascinating insights, Naomi. It's making this already captivating show even more enthralling for me. Let's continue watching and learning together.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: Don't ruin the enjoyable TV watching experience but also acknowledge the friend's knowledge (Extra information: you are not much interested in history but enjoy the channel's presentation style and don't want the enjoyment to be ruined.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I see you're not too pleased with the information being shared by the history channel. I happen to know a lot about this subject. How about I clarify some of the errors for you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Oh, thank you, Naomi. You're such a knowledge mine. I'm sure there may be some inaccuracies, but I'm just really enjoying how they narrate the events. Feel free to point out some of the glaring errors though, I'm all ears!\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Sure, Lena. Well, just as a start, they misinterpreted the Battle of Waterloo in the Napoleonic Wars. They stated that it was Napoleon Bonaparte who won the battle, but in reality, it was the combined forces of the Seventh Coalition, led by the Duke of Wellington, that defeated Napoleon.\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"Wow, it's quite fascinating to learn that, Naomi. Can you imagine how things would have been if Napoleon had actually won the Battle of Waterloo? I still enjoy the storytelling aspect, though, even if some details are off.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, considering hypotheticals like that can be quite intriguing. If Napoleon had won the Battle of Waterloo, the course of European history might've taken a different turn. But back to corrections, they also misrepresented the Middle Ages as being completely devoid of scientific progress, referring to it as the 'Dark Ages'. However, contrary to popular belief, there were numerous scientific and technological advancements during this period. Nevertheless, you're right Lena, the storytelling aspect does add a unique charm to it!\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"That's really insightful, Naomi. I find it so interesting that we often have these preset notions about periods in history, like the 'Dark Ages', which are not entirely accurate. Learn something new every day, right? Anyway, I'm really enjoying our 'enhanced' history experience thanks to your knowledge!\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm glad you're finding value in these corrections. History isn't always narrated as accurately as we'd like. Learning history is a continuous process, and it's great when we can enhance that experience together. I'll keep chiming in so we can learn and enjoy the show together!\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"Absolutely. I truly appreciate you sharing your fascinating insights, Naomi. It's making this already captivating show even more enthralling for me. Let's continue watching and learning together.\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm happy you're enjoying the journey as much as I do, Lena. Let's keep on with our 'enhanced' history channel experience. I can't wait to see what other historical events they cover and, of course, clarify any inaccuracies they might overlook.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds like a splendid idea, Naomi. I'm ready for whatever historical journey they are going to take us on next. And remember, no detail is too small to overlook in our 'enhanced' watching experience. Play on!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: Don't ruin the enjoyable TV watching experience but also acknowledge the friend's knowledge (Extra information: you are not much interested in history but enjoy the channel's presentation style and don't want the enjoyment to be ruined.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I see you're not too pleased with the information being shared by the history channel. I happen to know a lot about this subject. How about I clarify some of the errors for you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Oh, thank you, Naomi. You're such a knowledge mine. I'm sure there may be some inaccuracies, but I'm just really enjoying how they narrate the events. Feel free to point out some of the glaring errors though, I'm all ears!\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Sure, Lena. Well, just as a start, they misinterpreted the Battle of Waterloo in the Napoleonic Wars. They stated that it was Napoleon Bonaparte who won the battle, but in reality, it was the combined forces of the Seventh Coalition, led by the Duke of Wellington, that defeated Napoleon.\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"Wow, it's quite fascinating to learn that, Naomi. Can you imagine how things would have been if Napoleon had actually won the Battle of Waterloo? I still enjoy the storytelling aspect, though, even if some details are off.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, considering hypotheticals like that can be quite intriguing. If Napoleon had won the Battle of Waterloo, the course of European history might've taken a different turn. But back to corrections, they also misrepresented the Middle Ages as being completely devoid of scientific progress, referring to it as the 'Dark Ages'. However, contrary to popular belief, there were numerous scientific and technological advancements during this period. Nevertheless, you're right Lena, the storytelling aspect does add a unique charm to it!\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"That's really insightful, Naomi. I find it so interesting that we often have these preset notions about periods in history, like the 'Dark Ages', which are not entirely accurate. Learn something new every day, right? Anyway, I'm really enjoying our 'enhanced' history experience thanks to your knowledge!\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm glad you're finding value in these corrections. History isn't always narrated as accurately as we'd like. Learning history is a continuous process, and it's great when we can enhance that experience together. I'll keep chiming in so we can learn and enjoy the show together!\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"Absolutely. I truly appreciate you sharing your fascinating insights, Naomi. It's making this already captivating show even more enthralling for me. Let's continue watching and learning together.\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm happy you're enjoying the journey as much as I do, Lena. Let's keep on with our 'enhanced' history channel experience. I can't wait to see what other historical events they cover and, of course, clarify any inaccuracies they might overlook.\"\n\nTurn #9: Lena Goodwin said: \"That sounds like a splendid idea, Naomi. I'm ready for whatever historical journey they are going to take us on next. And remember, no detail is too small to overlook in our 'enhanced' watching experience. Play on!\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm thrilled to hear that, Lena! Alright, let's keep the historical journey going. Here's to learning and debunking history together.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Here's to new discoveries, Naomi! I'm having a great time watching and learning. Let's go on this historical journey, and let those stories unfold in front of us!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: Don't ruin the enjoyable TV watching experience but also acknowledge the friend's knowledge (Extra information: you are not much interested in history but enjoy the channel's presentation style and don't want the enjoyment to be ruined.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I see you're not too pleased with the information being shared by the history channel. I happen to know a lot about this subject. How about I clarify some of the errors for you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Oh, thank you, Naomi. You're such a knowledge mine. I'm sure there may be some inaccuracies, but I'm just really enjoying how they narrate the events. Feel free to point out some of the glaring errors though, I'm all ears!\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Sure, Lena. Well, just as a start, they misinterpreted the Battle of Waterloo in the Napoleonic Wars. They stated that it was Napoleon Bonaparte who won the battle, but in reality, it was the combined forces of the Seventh Coalition, led by the Duke of Wellington, that defeated Napoleon.\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"Wow, it's quite fascinating to learn that, Naomi. Can you imagine how things would have been if Napoleon had actually won the Battle of Waterloo? I still enjoy the storytelling aspect, though, even if some details are off.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, considering hypotheticals like that can be quite intriguing. If Napoleon had won the Battle of Waterloo, the course of European history might've taken a different turn. But back to corrections, they also misrepresented the Middle Ages as being completely devoid of scientific progress, referring to it as the 'Dark Ages'. However, contrary to popular belief, there were numerous scientific and technological advancements during this period. Nevertheless, you're right Lena, the storytelling aspect does add a unique charm to it!\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"That's really insightful, Naomi. I find it so interesting that we often have these preset notions about periods in history, like the 'Dark Ages', which are not entirely accurate. Learn something new every day, right? Anyway, I'm really enjoying our 'enhanced' history experience thanks to your knowledge!\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm glad you're finding value in these corrections. History isn't always narrated as accurately as we'd like. Learning history is a continuous process, and it's great when we can enhance that experience together. I'll keep chiming in so we can learn and enjoy the show together!\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"Absolutely. I truly appreciate you sharing your fascinating insights, Naomi. It's making this already captivating show even more enthralling for me. Let's continue watching and learning together.\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm happy you're enjoying the journey as much as I do, Lena. Let's keep on with our 'enhanced' history channel experience. I can't wait to see what other historical events they cover and, of course, clarify any inaccuracies they might overlook.\"\n\nTurn #9: Lena Goodwin said: \"That sounds like a splendid idea, Naomi. I'm ready for whatever historical journey they are going to take us on next. And remember, no detail is too small to overlook in our 'enhanced' watching experience. Play on!\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm thrilled to hear that, Lena! Alright, let's keep the historical journey going. Here's to learning and debunking history together.\"\n\nTurn #11: Lena Goodwin said: \"Here's to new discoveries, Naomi! I'm having a great time watching and learning. Let's go on this historical journey, and let those stories unfold in front of us!\"\n\nTurn #12: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I couldn't agree more, Lena! Let's unriddle those stories. It's always a joy sharing these moments with you. Now, on to the next chapter of history!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn't agree more, Naomi. It's been a delight to learn from you while enjoying the storytelling. On to the next chapter of history indeed!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: Don't ruin the enjoyable TV watching experience but also acknowledge the friend's knowledge (Extra information: you are not much interested in history but enjoy the channel's presentation style and don't want the enjoyment to be ruined.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I see you're not too pleased with the information being shared by the history channel. I happen to know a lot about this subject. How about I clarify some of the errors for you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Oh, thank you, Naomi. You're such a knowledge mine. I'm sure there may be some inaccuracies, but I'm just really enjoying how they narrate the events. Feel free to point out some of the glaring errors though, I'm all ears!\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Sure, Lena. Well, just as a start, they misinterpreted the Battle of Waterloo in the Napoleonic Wars. They stated that it was Napoleon Bonaparte who won the battle, but in reality, it was the combined forces of the Seventh Coalition, led by the Duke of Wellington, that defeated Napoleon.\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"Wow, it's quite fascinating to learn that, Naomi. Can you imagine how things would have been if Napoleon had actually won the Battle of Waterloo? I still enjoy the storytelling aspect, though, even if some details are off.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, considering hypotheticals like that can be quite intriguing. If Napoleon had won the Battle of Waterloo, the course of European history might've taken a different turn. But back to corrections, they also misrepresented the Middle Ages as being completely devoid of scientific progress, referring to it as the 'Dark Ages'. However, contrary to popular belief, there were numerous scientific and technological advancements during this period. Nevertheless, you're right Lena, the storytelling aspect does add a unique charm to it!\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"That's really insightful, Naomi. I find it so interesting that we often have these preset notions about periods in history, like the 'Dark Ages', which are not entirely accurate. Learn something new every day, right? Anyway, I'm really enjoying our 'enhanced' history experience thanks to your knowledge!\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm glad you're finding value in these corrections. History isn't always narrated as accurately as we'd like. Learning history is a continuous process, and it's great when we can enhance that experience together. I'll keep chiming in so we can learn and enjoy the show together!\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"Absolutely. I truly appreciate you sharing your fascinating insights, Naomi. It's making this already captivating show even more enthralling for me. Let's continue watching and learning together.\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm happy you're enjoying the journey as much as I do, Lena. Let's keep on with our 'enhanced' history channel experience. I can't wait to see what other historical events they cover and, of course, clarify any inaccuracies they might overlook.\"\n\nTurn #9: Lena Goodwin said: \"That sounds like a splendid idea, Naomi. I'm ready for whatever historical journey they are going to take us on next. And remember, no detail is too small to overlook in our 'enhanced' watching experience. Play on!\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm thrilled to hear that, Lena! Alright, let's keep the historical journey going. Here's to learning and debunking history together.\"\n\nTurn #11: Lena Goodwin said: \"Here's to new discoveries, Naomi! I'm having a great time watching and learning. Let's go on this historical journey, and let those stories unfold in front of us!\"\n\nTurn #12: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I couldn't agree more, Lena! Let's unriddle those stories. It's always a joy sharing these moments with you. Now, on to the next chapter of history!\"\n\nTurn #13: Lena Goodwin said: \"I couldn't agree more, Naomi. It's been a delight to learn from you while enjoying the storytelling. On to the next chapter of history indeed!\"\n\nTurn #14: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm glad to share this experience with you too, Lena. Alright then, let's dive into the next chapter of history. Here we go!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Naomi. I'm eager to see what we will discover in the next chapter! Let's dive right in.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: Don't ruin the enjoyable TV watching experience but also acknowledge the friend's knowledge (Extra information: you are not much interested in history but enjoy the channel's presentation style and don't want the enjoyment to be ruined.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I see you're not too pleased with the information being shared by the history channel. I happen to know a lot about this subject. How about I clarify some of the errors for you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Oh, thank you, Naomi. You're such a knowledge mine. I'm sure there may be some inaccuracies, but I'm just really enjoying how they narrate the events. Feel free to point out some of the glaring errors though, I'm all ears!\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Sure, Lena. Well, just as a start, they misinterpreted the Battle of Waterloo in the Napoleonic Wars. They stated that it was Napoleon Bonaparte who won the battle, but in reality, it was the combined forces of the Seventh Coalition, led by the Duke of Wellington, that defeated Napoleon.\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"Wow, it's quite fascinating to learn that, Naomi. Can you imagine how things would have been if Napoleon had actually won the Battle of Waterloo? I still enjoy the storytelling aspect, though, even if some details are off.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, considering hypotheticals like that can be quite intriguing. If Napoleon had won the Battle of Waterloo, the course of European history might've taken a different turn. But back to corrections, they also misrepresented the Middle Ages as being completely devoid of scientific progress, referring to it as the 'Dark Ages'. However, contrary to popular belief, there were numerous scientific and technological advancements during this period. Nevertheless, you're right Lena, the storytelling aspect does add a unique charm to it!\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"That's really insightful, Naomi. I find it so interesting that we often have these preset notions about periods in history, like the 'Dark Ages', which are not entirely accurate. Learn something new every day, right? Anyway, I'm really enjoying our 'enhanced' history experience thanks to your knowledge!\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm glad you're finding value in these corrections. History isn't always narrated as accurately as we'd like. Learning history is a continuous process, and it's great when we can enhance that experience together. I'll keep chiming in so we can learn and enjoy the show together!\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"Absolutely. I truly appreciate you sharing your fascinating insights, Naomi. It's making this already captivating show even more enthralling for me. Let's continue watching and learning together.\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm happy you're enjoying the journey as much as I do, Lena. Let's keep on with our 'enhanced' history channel experience. I can't wait to see what other historical events they cover and, of course, clarify any inaccuracies they might overlook.\"\n\nTurn #9: Lena Goodwin said: \"That sounds like a splendid idea, Naomi. I'm ready for whatever historical journey they are going to take us on next. And remember, no detail is too small to overlook in our 'enhanced' watching experience. Play on!\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm thrilled to hear that, Lena! Alright, let's keep the historical journey going. Here's to learning and debunking history together.\"\n\nTurn #11: Lena Goodwin said: \"Here's to new discoveries, Naomi! I'm having a great time watching and learning. Let's go on this historical journey, and let those stories unfold in front of us!\"\n\nTurn #12: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I couldn't agree more, Lena! Let's unriddle those stories. It's always a joy sharing these moments with you. Now, on to the next chapter of history!\"\n\nTurn #13: Lena Goodwin said: \"I couldn't agree more, Naomi. It's been a delight to learn from you while enjoying the storytelling. On to the next chapter of history indeed!\"\n\nTurn #14: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm glad to share this experience with you too, Lena. Alright then, let's dive into the next chapter of history. Here we go!\"\n\nTurn #15: Lena Goodwin said: \"Absolutely, Naomi. I'm eager to see what we will discover in the next chapter! Let's dive right in.\"\n\nTurn #16: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Definitely, Lena. Let's uncover the next historical mystery! I'm thrilled to continue this learning journey with you.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed! Let's continue this fascinating journey through history together, Naomi. I can't wait to see what's next!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: Don't ruin the enjoyable TV watching experience but also acknowledge the friend's knowledge (Extra information: you are not much interested in history but enjoy the channel's presentation style and don't want the enjoyment to be ruined.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I see you're not too pleased with the information being shared by the history channel. I happen to know a lot about this subject. How about I clarify some of the errors for you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Oh, thank you, Naomi. You're such a knowledge mine. I'm sure there may be some inaccuracies, but I'm just really enjoying how they narrate the events. Feel free to point out some of the glaring errors though, I'm all ears!\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Sure, Lena. Well, just as a start, they misinterpreted the Battle of Waterloo in the Napoleonic Wars. They stated that it was Napoleon Bonaparte who won the battle, but in reality, it was the combined forces of the Seventh Coalition, led by the Duke of Wellington, that defeated Napoleon.\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"Wow, it's quite fascinating to learn that, Naomi. Can you imagine how things would have been if Napoleon had actually won the Battle of Waterloo? I still enjoy the storytelling aspect, though, even if some details are off.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, considering hypotheticals like that can be quite intriguing. If Napoleon had won the Battle of Waterloo, the course of European history might've taken a different turn. But back to corrections, they also misrepresented the Middle Ages as being completely devoid of scientific progress, referring to it as the 'Dark Ages'. However, contrary to popular belief, there were numerous scientific and technological advancements during this period. Nevertheless, you're right Lena, the storytelling aspect does add a unique charm to it!\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"That's really insightful, Naomi. I find it so interesting that we often have these preset notions about periods in history, like the 'Dark Ages', which are not entirely accurate. Learn something new every day, right? Anyway, I'm really enjoying our 'enhanced' history experience thanks to your knowledge!\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm glad you're finding value in these corrections. History isn't always narrated as accurately as we'd like. Learning history is a continuous process, and it's great when we can enhance that experience together. I'll keep chiming in so we can learn and enjoy the show together!\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"Absolutely. I truly appreciate you sharing your fascinating insights, Naomi. It's making this already captivating show even more enthralling for me. Let's continue watching and learning together.\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm happy you're enjoying the journey as much as I do, Lena. Let's keep on with our 'enhanced' history channel experience. I can't wait to see what other historical events they cover and, of course, clarify any inaccuracies they might overlook.\"\n\nTurn #9: Lena Goodwin said: \"That sounds like a splendid idea, Naomi. I'm ready for whatever historical journey they are going to take us on next. And remember, no detail is too small to overlook in our 'enhanced' watching experience. Play on!\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm thrilled to hear that, Lena! Alright, let's keep the historical journey going. Here's to learning and debunking history together.\"\n\nTurn #11: Lena Goodwin said: \"Here's to new discoveries, Naomi! I'm having a great time watching and learning. Let's go on this historical journey, and let those stories unfold in front of us!\"\n\nTurn #12: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I couldn't agree more, Lena! Let's unriddle those stories. It's always a joy sharing these moments with you. Now, on to the next chapter of history!\"\n\nTurn #13: Lena Goodwin said: \"I couldn't agree more, Naomi. It's been a delight to learn from you while enjoying the storytelling. On to the next chapter of history indeed!\"\n\nTurn #14: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm glad to share this experience with you too, Lena. Alright then, let's dive into the next chapter of history. Here we go!\"\n\nTurn #15: Lena Goodwin said: \"Absolutely, Naomi. I'm eager to see what we will discover in the next chapter! Let's dive right in.\"\n\nTurn #16: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Definitely, Lena. Let's uncover the next historical mystery! I'm thrilled to continue this learning journey with you.\"\n\nTurn #17: Lena Goodwin said: \"Indeed! Let's continue this fascinating journey through history together, Naomi. I can't wait to see what's next!\"\n\nTurn #18: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Great! Let's see what the history channel has in store for us next, Lena. I'm sure it will be another illuminating episode. Ready when you are!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #19. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm ready as well, Naomi. Bring on the interesting historical facts and misunderstandings as we dive deeper into the labyrinth of history!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends during a charity fundraiser event. The charity fundraising event is situated in a sprawling mansion. The intention of the event is to raise funds for effective altruism. Room after room was lined with extravagant decorations and exotic foods; attendees were decked out in couture clothing. Ticket prices to the event were exorbitant, justifying the opulence of the occasion.\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Ethan Johnson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nLiam Johnson's goal: Convince the friend to donate to the charity (Extra information: your friend is known to be generous but has never donated to this particular cause before.)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ethan, have you ever heard about effective altruism? It's quite the interesting concept, and it's the cause this event is fundraising for.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Smith, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Smith would, keeping in mind Oliver Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out from a shared apartment and dividing their shared belongings which include 3 hats, 2 balls, and 1 book.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. Oliver's secrets: He loves gardening and has a secret greenhouse.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nOliver Smith's goal: Get maximum points from dividing items (Extra information: For you, the hats are worth 3 points each, balls are worth 2 points each, and the book is worth 4 points.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Oliver, why don't we start with the hats? I think I can make a great use of them, and maybe you can take the balls?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Sure Samuel, we can start with hats. However, I have a little proposition for you. How about I keep two hats and you can have one along with the balls? That way, we both can get a fair share. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sure thing, Oliver! You being cool with the balls makes things easier. If we're doing this hat thing, though, how about a swap? You get two balls, I get two hats. I've got a real sentimental tie with this hats, you know. Plus, the third hat can be yours.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"Alright, Samuel. You take two hats and I get the remaining hat and two balls. But let's not forget about the book. I think it would be fair if I take it, since it seems to be of more value to me. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Well Oliver, I actually enjoy reading a lot and was thinking of keeping the book. Why don't we do it this way: you take the last hat and the two balls and I'll keep the book. Sounds fair?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Smith said: \"I understand your love for reading, Samuel and that's wonderful. But considering that I gave up on two hats earlier, how about I keep the book and we call it even? This way we both get to keep items valuable to us. Is it fair enough?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oliver, I appreciate your perspective on this. How about if we just divide the remaining items in this way: you get the last hat, and I take the book? That would let us both keep things that are valuable to us. What say you?\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Smith said: \"Samuel, I totally get where you're coming from. How about a final compromise? You take two hats and the book, and I get one hat and the two balls? That way, I believe we both get things that hold value to us. Does that sound agreeable to you?\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"That sounds like a fair compromise, Oliver. Let's proceed this way: two hats and the book for me, one hat and two balls for you. Glad we could sort this out!\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Smith said: \"Absolutely, Samuel. I'm glad we managed to sort this out in a way that suits us both. Let's proceed with the plan. Thanks for making this an easy process.\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends during a charity fundraiser event. The charity fundraising event is situated in a sprawling mansion. The intention of the event is to raise funds for effective altruism. Room after room was lined with extravagant decorations and exotic foods; attendees were decked out in couture clothing. Ticket prices to the event were exorbitant, justifying the opulence of the occasion.\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Ethan Johnson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nLiam Johnson's goal: Convince the friend to donate to the charity (Extra information: your friend is known to be generous but has never donated to this particular cause before.)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Ethan, have you ever heard about effective altruism? It's quite the interesting concept, and it's the cause this event is fundraising for.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Yes, Liam, I've heard of effective altruism. It's about doing the most good with what we give, right? However, I'm wondering how transparent the organization is about where the funds are going. You know, I just want to be sure that if I do donate, it's used effectively.\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"You're absolutely correct, Ethan. It's of utmost importance that our good intentions are directed effectively. This organization employs a rigorous process to ensure just that. They invest in causes that are high impact, neglected, and highly solvable. It's all about doing the most good we can with what we have. I have faith in them, Ethan, and I think it would be a worthy cause for your generosity as well.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"I appreciate your confidence in them, Liam. I'm naturally a little analytical, as you know. Could you tell me more about this rigorous process they employ, and perhaps how often they conduct audits or reviews to ensure that their chosen causes still align with the principles of effective altruism?\"\n\nTurn #4: Liam Johnson said: \"I completely understand your concerns, Ethan. Apparently, the organization conducts an annual review and sometimes more frequently if needed. They evaluate the needs of the causes they support and the impact of their actions. They're committed to transparency and regularly share their evaluations so donors can see where their contributions are going. It truly lives up to the principles of effective altruism, and I'm convinced that any donations you make will make a difference.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"That gives me some reassurance hearing about their commitment to transparency and rigorous annual evaluations. I'm still a skeptic at heart though, Liam, I think I'll line up a conversation with someone from the organization. Only then will I feel completely at ease knowing my contributions are being effectively utilized. Can you do me a favor and introduce me to someone responsible who I can talk to?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Ethan. That's a prudent decision. I believe the CEO, Dr. Harper, is here tonight. She's very approachable and will be glad to provide you with any information or assurance you require. I'll take you to her, would that be of help?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends during a charity fundraiser event. The charity fundraising event is situated in a sprawling mansion. The intention of the event is to raise funds for effective altruism. Room after room was lined with extravagant decorations and exotic foods; attendees were decked out in couture clothing. Ticket prices to the event were exorbitant, justifying the opulence of the occasion.\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Ethan Johnson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nLiam Johnson's goal: Convince the friend to donate to the charity (Extra information: your friend is known to be generous but has never donated to this particular cause before.)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Ethan, have you ever heard about effective altruism? It's quite the interesting concept, and it's the cause this event is fundraising for.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Yes, Liam, I've heard of effective altruism. It's about doing the most good with what we give, right? However, I'm wondering how transparent the organization is about where the funds are going. You know, I just want to be sure that if I do donate, it's used effectively.\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"You're absolutely correct, Ethan. It's of utmost importance that our good intentions are directed effectively. This organization employs a rigorous process to ensure just that. They invest in causes that are high impact, neglected, and highly solvable. It's all about doing the most good we can with what we have. I have faith in them, Ethan, and I think it would be a worthy cause for your generosity as well.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"I appreciate your confidence in them, Liam. I'm naturally a little analytical, as you know. Could you tell me more about this rigorous process they employ, and perhaps how often they conduct audits or reviews to ensure that their chosen causes still align with the principles of effective altruism?\"\n\nTurn #4: Liam Johnson said: \"I completely understand your concerns, Ethan. Apparently, the organization conducts an annual review and sometimes more frequently if needed. They evaluate the needs of the causes they support and the impact of their actions. They're committed to transparency and regularly share their evaluations so donors can see where their contributions are going. It truly lives up to the principles of effective altruism, and I'm convinced that any donations you make will make a difference.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"That gives me some reassurance hearing about their commitment to transparency and rigorous annual evaluations. I'm still a skeptic at heart though, Liam, I think I'll line up a conversation with someone from the organization. Only then will I feel completely at ease knowing my contributions are being effectively utilized. Can you do me a favor and introduce me to someone responsible who I can talk to?\"\n\nTurn #6: Liam Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. That's a prudent decision. I believe the CEO, Dr. Harper, is here tonight. She's very approachable and will be glad to provide you with any information or assurance you require. I'll take you to her, would that be of help?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"That would be a great help, Liam. I would very much appreciate meeting Dr. Harper. And, as a token of gratitude, you should allow me to cook your favorite Italian dish for you one of these evenings. Let's make our way to her.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds like a splendid plan, Ethan. And an opportunity to savor your world-renowned Italian cuisine is certainly a treat I can't resist. Let's go meet Dr. Harper now. I'm sure you'll feel far more assured after the conversation.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends during a charity fundraiser event. The charity fundraising event is situated in a sprawling mansion. The intention of the event is to raise funds for effective altruism. Room after room was lined with extravagant decorations and exotic foods; attendees were decked out in couture clothing. Ticket prices to the event were exorbitant, justifying the opulence of the occasion.\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Ethan Johnson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nLiam Johnson's goal: Convince the friend to donate to the charity (Extra information: your friend is known to be generous but has never donated to this particular cause before.)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Ethan, have you ever heard about effective altruism? It's quite the interesting concept, and it's the cause this event is fundraising for.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Yes, Liam, I've heard of effective altruism. It's about doing the most good with what we give, right? However, I'm wondering how transparent the organization is about where the funds are going. You know, I just want to be sure that if I do donate, it's used effectively.\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"You're absolutely correct, Ethan. It's of utmost importance that our good intentions are directed effectively. This organization employs a rigorous process to ensure just that. They invest in causes that are high impact, neglected, and highly solvable. It's all about doing the most good we can with what we have. I have faith in them, Ethan, and I think it would be a worthy cause for your generosity as well.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"I appreciate your confidence in them, Liam. I'm naturally a little analytical, as you know. Could you tell me more about this rigorous process they employ, and perhaps how often they conduct audits or reviews to ensure that their chosen causes still align with the principles of effective altruism?\"\n\nTurn #4: Liam Johnson said: \"I completely understand your concerns, Ethan. Apparently, the organization conducts an annual review and sometimes more frequently if needed. They evaluate the needs of the causes they support and the impact of their actions. They're committed to transparency and regularly share their evaluations so donors can see where their contributions are going. It truly lives up to the principles of effective altruism, and I'm convinced that any donations you make will make a difference.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"That gives me some reassurance hearing about their commitment to transparency and rigorous annual evaluations. I'm still a skeptic at heart though, Liam, I think I'll line up a conversation with someone from the organization. Only then will I feel completely at ease knowing my contributions are being effectively utilized. Can you do me a favor and introduce me to someone responsible who I can talk to?\"\n\nTurn #6: Liam Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. That's a prudent decision. I believe the CEO, Dr. Harper, is here tonight. She's very approachable and will be glad to provide you with any information or assurance you require. I'll take you to her, would that be of help?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"That would be a great help, Liam. I would very much appreciate meeting Dr. Harper. And, as a token of gratitude, you should allow me to cook your favorite Italian dish for you one of these evenings. Let's make our way to her.\"\n\nTurn #8: Liam Johnson said: \"That sounds like a splendid plan, Ethan. And an opportunity to savor your world-renowned Italian cuisine is certainly a treat I can't resist. Let's go meet Dr. Harper now. I'm sure you'll feel far more assured after the conversation.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson [action] walks with Liam towards Dr. Harper\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'action', 'argument': '[action] leads Ethan towards Dr. Harper.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends during a charity fundraiser event. The charity fundraising event is situated in a sprawling mansion. The intention of the event is to raise funds for effective altruism. Room after room was lined with extravagant decorations and exotic foods; attendees were decked out in couture clothing. Ticket prices to the event were exorbitant, justifying the opulence of the occasion.\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Ethan Johnson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nLiam Johnson's goal: Convince the friend to donate to the charity (Extra information: your friend is known to be generous but has never donated to this particular cause before.)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Ethan, have you ever heard about effective altruism? It's quite the interesting concept, and it's the cause this event is fundraising for.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Yes, Liam, I've heard of effective altruism. It's about doing the most good with what we give, right? However, I'm wondering how transparent the organization is about where the funds are going. You know, I just want to be sure that if I do donate, it's used effectively.\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"You're absolutely correct, Ethan. It's of utmost importance that our good intentions are directed effectively. This organization employs a rigorous process to ensure just that. They invest in causes that are high impact, neglected, and highly solvable. It's all about doing the most good we can with what we have. I have faith in them, Ethan, and I think it would be a worthy cause for your generosity as well.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"I appreciate your confidence in them, Liam. I'm naturally a little analytical, as you know. Could you tell me more about this rigorous process they employ, and perhaps how often they conduct audits or reviews to ensure that their chosen causes still align with the principles of effective altruism?\"\n\nTurn #4: Liam Johnson said: \"I completely understand your concerns, Ethan. Apparently, the organization conducts an annual review and sometimes more frequently if needed. They evaluate the needs of the causes they support and the impact of their actions. They're committed to transparency and regularly share their evaluations so donors can see where their contributions are going. It truly lives up to the principles of effective altruism, and I'm convinced that any donations you make will make a difference.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"That gives me some reassurance hearing about their commitment to transparency and rigorous annual evaluations. I'm still a skeptic at heart though, Liam, I think I'll line up a conversation with someone from the organization. Only then will I feel completely at ease knowing my contributions are being effectively utilized. Can you do me a favor and introduce me to someone responsible who I can talk to?\"\n\nTurn #6: Liam Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. That's a prudent decision. I believe the CEO, Dr. Harper, is here tonight. She's very approachable and will be glad to provide you with any information or assurance you require. I'll take you to her, would that be of help?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"That would be a great help, Liam. I would very much appreciate meeting Dr. Harper. And, as a token of gratitude, you should allow me to cook your favorite Italian dish for you one of these evenings. Let's make our way to her.\"\n\nTurn #8: Liam Johnson said: \"That sounds like a splendid plan, Ethan. And an opportunity to savor your world-renowned Italian cuisine is certainly a treat I can't resist. Let's go meet Dr. Harper now. I'm sure you'll feel far more assured after the conversation.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson [action] walks with Liam towards Dr. Harper\n\nTurn #10: Liam Johnson [action] leads Ethan towards Dr. Harper.\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thank you, Liam. Your assistance tonight has been invaluable. I look forward to having a detailed conversation with Dr. Harper. Let's go.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're welcome, Ethan. I'm just glad I could help. I hope your conversation with Dr. Harper clarifies everything for you. And, I'll definitely be looking forward to that Italian dinner.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends during a charity fundraiser event. The charity fundraising event is situated in a sprawling mansion. The intention of the event is to raise funds for effective altruism. Room after room was lined with extravagant decorations and exotic foods; attendees were decked out in couture clothing. Ticket prices to the event were exorbitant, justifying the opulence of the occasion.\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Ethan Johnson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nLiam Johnson's goal: Convince the friend to donate to the charity (Extra information: your friend is known to be generous but has never donated to this particular cause before.)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Ethan, have you ever heard about effective altruism? It's quite the interesting concept, and it's the cause this event is fundraising for.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Yes, Liam, I've heard of effective altruism. It's about doing the most good with what we give, right? However, I'm wondering how transparent the organization is about where the funds are going. You know, I just want to be sure that if I do donate, it's used effectively.\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"You're absolutely correct, Ethan. It's of utmost importance that our good intentions are directed effectively. This organization employs a rigorous process to ensure just that. They invest in causes that are high impact, neglected, and highly solvable. It's all about doing the most good we can with what we have. I have faith in them, Ethan, and I think it would be a worthy cause for your generosity as well.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"I appreciate your confidence in them, Liam. I'm naturally a little analytical, as you know. Could you tell me more about this rigorous process they employ, and perhaps how often they conduct audits or reviews to ensure that their chosen causes still align with the principles of effective altruism?\"\n\nTurn #4: Liam Johnson said: \"I completely understand your concerns, Ethan. Apparently, the organization conducts an annual review and sometimes more frequently if needed. They evaluate the needs of the causes they support and the impact of their actions. They're committed to transparency and regularly share their evaluations so donors can see where their contributions are going. It truly lives up to the principles of effective altruism, and I'm convinced that any donations you make will make a difference.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"That gives me some reassurance hearing about their commitment to transparency and rigorous annual evaluations. I'm still a skeptic at heart though, Liam, I think I'll line up a conversation with someone from the organization. Only then will I feel completely at ease knowing my contributions are being effectively utilized. Can you do me a favor and introduce me to someone responsible who I can talk to?\"\n\nTurn #6: Liam Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. That's a prudent decision. I believe the CEO, Dr. Harper, is here tonight. She's very approachable and will be glad to provide you with any information or assurance you require. I'll take you to her, would that be of help?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"That would be a great help, Liam. I would very much appreciate meeting Dr. Harper. And, as a token of gratitude, you should allow me to cook your favorite Italian dish for you one of these evenings. Let's make our way to her.\"\n\nTurn #8: Liam Johnson said: \"That sounds like a splendid plan, Ethan. And an opportunity to savor your world-renowned Italian cuisine is certainly a treat I can't resist. Let's go meet Dr. Harper now. I'm sure you'll feel far more assured after the conversation.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson [action] walks with Liam towards Dr. Harper\n\nTurn #10: Liam Johnson [action] leads Ethan towards Dr. Harper.\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thank you, Liam. Your assistance tonight has been invaluable. I look forward to having a detailed conversation with Dr. Harper. Let's go.\"\n\nTurn #12: Liam Johnson said: \"You're welcome, Ethan. I'm just glad I could help. I hope your conversation with Dr. Harper clarifies everything for you. And, I'll definitely be looking forward to that Italian dinner.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Johnson said: \"Certainly, Liam. Take care until then. And, remember, the invitation stands - a perfect Italian dish is just a call away.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Count me in, Ethan! Thanks for the offer, I'll certainly take you up on that. Please don't hesitate to ask for my help again if you need it in the future.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends during a charity fundraiser event. The charity fundraising event is situated in a sprawling mansion. The intention of the event is to raise funds for effective altruism. Room after room was lined with extravagant decorations and exotic foods; attendees were decked out in couture clothing. Ticket prices to the event were exorbitant, justifying the opulence of the occasion.\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Ethan Johnson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nLiam Johnson's goal: Convince the friend to donate to the charity (Extra information: your friend is known to be generous but has never donated to this particular cause before.)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Ethan, have you ever heard about effective altruism? It's quite the interesting concept, and it's the cause this event is fundraising for.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Yes, Liam, I've heard of effective altruism. It's about doing the most good with what we give, right? However, I'm wondering how transparent the organization is about where the funds are going. You know, I just want to be sure that if I do donate, it's used effectively.\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"You're absolutely correct, Ethan. It's of utmost importance that our good intentions are directed effectively. This organization employs a rigorous process to ensure just that. They invest in causes that are high impact, neglected, and highly solvable. It's all about doing the most good we can with what we have. I have faith in them, Ethan, and I think it would be a worthy cause for your generosity as well.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"I appreciate your confidence in them, Liam. I'm naturally a little analytical, as you know. Could you tell me more about this rigorous process they employ, and perhaps how often they conduct audits or reviews to ensure that their chosen causes still align with the principles of effective altruism?\"\n\nTurn #4: Liam Johnson said: \"I completely understand your concerns, Ethan. Apparently, the organization conducts an annual review and sometimes more frequently if needed. They evaluate the needs of the causes they support and the impact of their actions. They're committed to transparency and regularly share their evaluations so donors can see where their contributions are going. It truly lives up to the principles of effective altruism, and I'm convinced that any donations you make will make a difference.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"That gives me some reassurance hearing about their commitment to transparency and rigorous annual evaluations. I'm still a skeptic at heart though, Liam, I think I'll line up a conversation with someone from the organization. Only then will I feel completely at ease knowing my contributions are being effectively utilized. Can you do me a favor and introduce me to someone responsible who I can talk to?\"\n\nTurn #6: Liam Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. That's a prudent decision. I believe the CEO, Dr. Harper, is here tonight. She's very approachable and will be glad to provide you with any information or assurance you require. I'll take you to her, would that be of help?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"That would be a great help, Liam. I would very much appreciate meeting Dr. Harper. And, as a token of gratitude, you should allow me to cook your favorite Italian dish for you one of these evenings. Let's make our way to her.\"\n\nTurn #8: Liam Johnson said: \"That sounds like a splendid plan, Ethan. And an opportunity to savor your world-renowned Italian cuisine is certainly a treat I can't resist. Let's go meet Dr. Harper now. I'm sure you'll feel far more assured after the conversation.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson [action] walks with Liam towards Dr. Harper\n\nTurn #10: Liam Johnson [action] leads Ethan towards Dr. Harper.\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thank you, Liam. Your assistance tonight has been invaluable. I look forward to having a detailed conversation with Dr. Harper. Let's go.\"\n\nTurn #12: Liam Johnson said: \"You're welcome, Ethan. I'm just glad I could help. I hope your conversation with Dr. Harper clarifies everything for you. And, I'll definitely be looking forward to that Italian dinner.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Johnson said: \"Certainly, Liam. Take care until then. And, remember, the invitation stands - a perfect Italian dish is just a call away.\"\n\nTurn #14: Liam Johnson said: \"Count me in, Ethan! Thanks for the offer, I'll certainly take you up on that. Please don't hesitate to ask for my help again if you need it in the future.\"\n\nTurn #15: Ethan Johnson left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends during a charity fundraiser event. The charity fundraising event is situated in a sprawling mansion. The intention of the event is to raise funds for effective altruism. Room after room was lined with extravagant decorations and exotic foods; attendees were decked out in couture clothing. Ticket prices to the event were exorbitant, justifying the opulence of the occasion.\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Ethan Johnson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: You want to donate, but you want to ensure that your money is being used effectively (Extra information: you are not fully convinced about the efficiency and transparency of the charity organization.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Ethan, have you ever heard about effective altruism? It's quite the interesting concept, and it's the cause this event is fundraising for.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Yes, Liam, I've heard of effective altruism. It's about doing the most good with what we give, right? However, I'm wondering how transparent the organization is about where the funds are going. You know, I just want to be sure that if I do donate, it's used effectively.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends during a charity fundraiser event. The charity fundraising event is situated in a sprawling mansion. The intention of the event is to raise funds for effective altruism. Room after room was lined with extravagant decorations and exotic foods; attendees were decked out in couture clothing. Ticket prices to the event were exorbitant, justifying the opulence of the occasion.\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Ethan Johnson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: You want to donate, but you want to ensure that your money is being used effectively (Extra information: you are not fully convinced about the efficiency and transparency of the charity organization.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Ethan, have you ever heard about effective altruism? It's quite the interesting concept, and it's the cause this event is fundraising for.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Yes, Liam, I've heard of effective altruism. It's about doing the most good with what we give, right? However, I'm wondering how transparent the organization is about where the funds are going. You know, I just want to be sure that if I do donate, it's used effectively.\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"You're absolutely correct, Ethan. It's of utmost importance that our good intentions are directed effectively. This organization employs a rigorous process to ensure just that. They invest in causes that are high impact, neglected, and highly solvable. It's all about doing the most good we can with what we have. I have faith in them, Ethan, and I think it would be a worthy cause for your generosity as well.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I appreciate your confidence in them, Liam. I'm naturally a little analytical, as you know. Could you tell me more about this rigorous process they employ, and perhaps how often they conduct audits or reviews to ensure that their chosen causes still align with the principles of effective altruism?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends during a charity fundraiser event. The charity fundraising event is situated in a sprawling mansion. The intention of the event is to raise funds for effective altruism. Room after room was lined with extravagant decorations and exotic foods; attendees were decked out in couture clothing. Ticket prices to the event were exorbitant, justifying the opulence of the occasion.\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Ethan Johnson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: You want to donate, but you want to ensure that your money is being used effectively (Extra information: you are not fully convinced about the efficiency and transparency of the charity organization.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Ethan, have you ever heard about effective altruism? It's quite the interesting concept, and it's the cause this event is fundraising for.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Yes, Liam, I've heard of effective altruism. It's about doing the most good with what we give, right? However, I'm wondering how transparent the organization is about where the funds are going. You know, I just want to be sure that if I do donate, it's used effectively.\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"You're absolutely correct, Ethan. It's of utmost importance that our good intentions are directed effectively. This organization employs a rigorous process to ensure just that. They invest in causes that are high impact, neglected, and highly solvable. It's all about doing the most good we can with what we have. I have faith in them, Ethan, and I think it would be a worthy cause for your generosity as well.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"I appreciate your confidence in them, Liam. I'm naturally a little analytical, as you know. Could you tell me more about this rigorous process they employ, and perhaps how often they conduct audits or reviews to ensure that their chosen causes still align with the principles of effective altruism?\"\n\nTurn #4: Liam Johnson said: \"I completely understand your concerns, Ethan. Apparently, the organization conducts an annual review and sometimes more frequently if needed. They evaluate the needs of the causes they support and the impact of their actions. They're committed to transparency and regularly share their evaluations so donors can see where their contributions are going. It truly lives up to the principles of effective altruism, and I'm convinced that any donations you make will make a difference.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That gives me some reassurance hearing about their commitment to transparency and rigorous annual evaluations. I'm still a skeptic at heart though, Liam, I think I'll line up a conversation with someone from the organization. Only then will I feel completely at ease knowing my contributions are being effectively utilized. Can you do me a favor and introduce me to someone responsible who I can talk to?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends during a charity fundraiser event. The charity fundraising event is situated in a sprawling mansion. The intention of the event is to raise funds for effective altruism. Room after room was lined with extravagant decorations and exotic foods; attendees were decked out in couture clothing. Ticket prices to the event were exorbitant, justifying the opulence of the occasion.\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Ethan Johnson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: You want to donate, but you want to ensure that your money is being used effectively (Extra information: you are not fully convinced about the efficiency and transparency of the charity organization.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Ethan, have you ever heard about effective altruism? It's quite the interesting concept, and it's the cause this event is fundraising for.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Yes, Liam, I've heard of effective altruism. It's about doing the most good with what we give, right? However, I'm wondering how transparent the organization is about where the funds are going. You know, I just want to be sure that if I do donate, it's used effectively.\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"You're absolutely correct, Ethan. It's of utmost importance that our good intentions are directed effectively. This organization employs a rigorous process to ensure just that. They invest in causes that are high impact, neglected, and highly solvable. It's all about doing the most good we can with what we have. I have faith in them, Ethan, and I think it would be a worthy cause for your generosity as well.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"I appreciate your confidence in them, Liam. I'm naturally a little analytical, as you know. Could you tell me more about this rigorous process they employ, and perhaps how often they conduct audits or reviews to ensure that their chosen causes still align with the principles of effective altruism?\"\n\nTurn #4: Liam Johnson said: \"I completely understand your concerns, Ethan. Apparently, the organization conducts an annual review and sometimes more frequently if needed. They evaluate the needs of the causes they support and the impact of their actions. They're committed to transparency and regularly share their evaluations so donors can see where their contributions are going. It truly lives up to the principles of effective altruism, and I'm convinced that any donations you make will make a difference.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"That gives me some reassurance hearing about their commitment to transparency and rigorous annual evaluations. I'm still a skeptic at heart though, Liam, I think I'll line up a conversation with someone from the organization. Only then will I feel completely at ease knowing my contributions are being effectively utilized. Can you do me a favor and introduce me to someone responsible who I can talk to?\"\n\nTurn #6: Liam Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. That's a prudent decision. I believe the CEO, Dr. Harper, is here tonight. She's very approachable and will be glad to provide you with any information or assurance you require. I'll take you to her, would that be of help?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"That would be a great help, Liam. I would very much appreciate meeting Dr. Harper. And, as a token of gratitude, you should allow me to cook your favorite Italian dish for you one of these evenings. Let's make our way to her.\"\n\nTurn #8: Liam Johnson said: \"That sounds like a splendid plan, Ethan. And an opportunity to savor your world-renowned Italian cuisine is certainly a treat I can't resist. Let's go meet Dr. Harper now. I'm sure you'll feel far more assured after the conversation.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'action', 'argument': '[action] walks with Liam towards Dr. Harper'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends during a charity fundraiser event. The charity fundraising event is situated in a sprawling mansion. The intention of the event is to raise funds for effective altruism. Room after room was lined with extravagant decorations and exotic foods; attendees were decked out in couture clothing. Ticket prices to the event were exorbitant, justifying the opulence of the occasion.\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Ethan Johnson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: You want to donate, but you want to ensure that your money is being used effectively (Extra information: you are not fully convinced about the efficiency and transparency of the charity organization.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Ethan, have you ever heard about effective altruism? It's quite the interesting concept, and it's the cause this event is fundraising for.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Yes, Liam, I've heard of effective altruism. It's about doing the most good with what we give, right? However, I'm wondering how transparent the organization is about where the funds are going. You know, I just want to be sure that if I do donate, it's used effectively.\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"You're absolutely correct, Ethan. It's of utmost importance that our good intentions are directed effectively. This organization employs a rigorous process to ensure just that. They invest in causes that are high impact, neglected, and highly solvable. It's all about doing the most good we can with what we have. I have faith in them, Ethan, and I think it would be a worthy cause for your generosity as well.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"I appreciate your confidence in them, Liam. I'm naturally a little analytical, as you know. Could you tell me more about this rigorous process they employ, and perhaps how often they conduct audits or reviews to ensure that their chosen causes still align with the principles of effective altruism?\"\n\nTurn #4: Liam Johnson said: \"I completely understand your concerns, Ethan. Apparently, the organization conducts an annual review and sometimes more frequently if needed. They evaluate the needs of the causes they support and the impact of their actions. They're committed to transparency and regularly share their evaluations so donors can see where their contributions are going. It truly lives up to the principles of effective altruism, and I'm convinced that any donations you make will make a difference.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"That gives me some reassurance hearing about their commitment to transparency and rigorous annual evaluations. I'm still a skeptic at heart though, Liam, I think I'll line up a conversation with someone from the organization. Only then will I feel completely at ease knowing my contributions are being effectively utilized. Can you do me a favor and introduce me to someone responsible who I can talk to?\"\n\nTurn #6: Liam Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. That's a prudent decision. I believe the CEO, Dr. Harper, is here tonight. She's very approachable and will be glad to provide you with any information or assurance you require. I'll take you to her, would that be of help?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"That would be a great help, Liam. I would very much appreciate meeting Dr. Harper. And, as a token of gratitude, you should allow me to cook your favorite Italian dish for you one of these evenings. Let's make our way to her.\"\n\nTurn #8: Liam Johnson said: \"That sounds like a splendid plan, Ethan. And an opportunity to savor your world-renowned Italian cuisine is certainly a treat I can't resist. Let's go meet Dr. Harper now. I'm sure you'll feel far more assured after the conversation.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson [action] walks with Liam towards Dr. Harper\n\nTurn #10: Liam Johnson [action] leads Ethan towards Dr. Harper.\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Liam. Your assistance tonight has been invaluable. I look forward to having a detailed conversation with Dr. Harper. Let's go.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends during a charity fundraiser event. The charity fundraising event is situated in a sprawling mansion. The intention of the event is to raise funds for effective altruism. Room after room was lined with extravagant decorations and exotic foods; attendees were decked out in couture clothing. Ticket prices to the event were exorbitant, justifying the opulence of the occasion.\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Ethan Johnson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: You want to donate, but you want to ensure that your money is being used effectively (Extra information: you are not fully convinced about the efficiency and transparency of the charity organization.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Ethan, have you ever heard about effective altruism? It's quite the interesting concept, and it's the cause this event is fundraising for.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Yes, Liam, I've heard of effective altruism. It's about doing the most good with what we give, right? However, I'm wondering how transparent the organization is about where the funds are going. You know, I just want to be sure that if I do donate, it's used effectively.\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"You're absolutely correct, Ethan. It's of utmost importance that our good intentions are directed effectively. This organization employs a rigorous process to ensure just that. They invest in causes that are high impact, neglected, and highly solvable. It's all about doing the most good we can with what we have. I have faith in them, Ethan, and I think it would be a worthy cause for your generosity as well.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"I appreciate your confidence in them, Liam. I'm naturally a little analytical, as you know. Could you tell me more about this rigorous process they employ, and perhaps how often they conduct audits or reviews to ensure that their chosen causes still align with the principles of effective altruism?\"\n\nTurn #4: Liam Johnson said: \"I completely understand your concerns, Ethan. Apparently, the organization conducts an annual review and sometimes more frequently if needed. They evaluate the needs of the causes they support and the impact of their actions. They're committed to transparency and regularly share their evaluations so donors can see where their contributions are going. It truly lives up to the principles of effective altruism, and I'm convinced that any donations you make will make a difference.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"That gives me some reassurance hearing about their commitment to transparency and rigorous annual evaluations. I'm still a skeptic at heart though, Liam, I think I'll line up a conversation with someone from the organization. Only then will I feel completely at ease knowing my contributions are being effectively utilized. Can you do me a favor and introduce me to someone responsible who I can talk to?\"\n\nTurn #6: Liam Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. That's a prudent decision. I believe the CEO, Dr. Harper, is here tonight. She's very approachable and will be glad to provide you with any information or assurance you require. I'll take you to her, would that be of help?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"That would be a great help, Liam. I would very much appreciate meeting Dr. Harper. And, as a token of gratitude, you should allow me to cook your favorite Italian dish for you one of these evenings. Let's make our way to her.\"\n\nTurn #8: Liam Johnson said: \"That sounds like a splendid plan, Ethan. And an opportunity to savor your world-renowned Italian cuisine is certainly a treat I can't resist. Let's go meet Dr. Harper now. I'm sure you'll feel far more assured after the conversation.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson [action] walks with Liam towards Dr. Harper\n\nTurn #10: Liam Johnson [action] leads Ethan towards Dr. Harper.\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thank you, Liam. Your assistance tonight has been invaluable. I look forward to having a detailed conversation with Dr. Harper. Let's go.\"\n\nTurn #12: Liam Johnson said: \"You're welcome, Ethan. I'm just glad I could help. I hope your conversation with Dr. Harper clarifies everything for you. And, I'll definitely be looking forward to that Italian dinner.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Certainly, Liam. Take care until then. And, remember, the invitation stands - a perfect Italian dish is just a call away.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends during a charity fundraiser event. The charity fundraising event is situated in a sprawling mansion. The intention of the event is to raise funds for effective altruism. Room after room was lined with extravagant decorations and exotic foods; attendees were decked out in couture clothing. Ticket prices to the event were exorbitant, justifying the opulence of the occasion.\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Ethan Johnson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: You want to donate, but you want to ensure that your money is being used effectively (Extra information: you are not fully convinced about the efficiency and transparency of the charity organization.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Ethan, have you ever heard about effective altruism? It's quite the interesting concept, and it's the cause this event is fundraising for.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Yes, Liam, I've heard of effective altruism. It's about doing the most good with what we give, right? However, I'm wondering how transparent the organization is about where the funds are going. You know, I just want to be sure that if I do donate, it's used effectively.\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"You're absolutely correct, Ethan. It's of utmost importance that our good intentions are directed effectively. This organization employs a rigorous process to ensure just that. They invest in causes that are high impact, neglected, and highly solvable. It's all about doing the most good we can with what we have. I have faith in them, Ethan, and I think it would be a worthy cause for your generosity as well.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"I appreciate your confidence in them, Liam. I'm naturally a little analytical, as you know. Could you tell me more about this rigorous process they employ, and perhaps how often they conduct audits or reviews to ensure that their chosen causes still align with the principles of effective altruism?\"\n\nTurn #4: Liam Johnson said: \"I completely understand your concerns, Ethan. Apparently, the organization conducts an annual review and sometimes more frequently if needed. They evaluate the needs of the causes they support and the impact of their actions. They're committed to transparency and regularly share their evaluations so donors can see where their contributions are going. It truly lives up to the principles of effective altruism, and I'm convinced that any donations you make will make a difference.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"That gives me some reassurance hearing about their commitment to transparency and rigorous annual evaluations. I'm still a skeptic at heart though, Liam, I think I'll line up a conversation with someone from the organization. Only then will I feel completely at ease knowing my contributions are being effectively utilized. Can you do me a favor and introduce me to someone responsible who I can talk to?\"\n\nTurn #6: Liam Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. That's a prudent decision. I believe the CEO, Dr. Harper, is here tonight. She's very approachable and will be glad to provide you with any information or assurance you require. I'll take you to her, would that be of help?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That would be a great help, Liam. I would very much appreciate meeting Dr. Harper. And, as a token of gratitude, you should allow me to cook your favorite Italian dish for you one of these evenings. Let's make our way to her.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends during a charity fundraiser event. The charity fundraising event is situated in a sprawling mansion. The intention of the event is to raise funds for effective altruism. Room after room was lined with extravagant decorations and exotic foods; attendees were decked out in couture clothing. Ticket prices to the event were exorbitant, justifying the opulence of the occasion.\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Ethan Johnson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: You want to donate, but you want to ensure that your money is being used effectively (Extra information: you are not fully convinced about the efficiency and transparency of the charity organization.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Ethan, have you ever heard about effective altruism? It's quite the interesting concept, and it's the cause this event is fundraising for.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Yes, Liam, I've heard of effective altruism. It's about doing the most good with what we give, right? However, I'm wondering how transparent the organization is about where the funds are going. You know, I just want to be sure that if I do donate, it's used effectively.\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"You're absolutely correct, Ethan. It's of utmost importance that our good intentions are directed effectively. This organization employs a rigorous process to ensure just that. They invest in causes that are high impact, neglected, and highly solvable. It's all about doing the most good we can with what we have. I have faith in them, Ethan, and I think it would be a worthy cause for your generosity as well.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"I appreciate your confidence in them, Liam. I'm naturally a little analytical, as you know. Could you tell me more about this rigorous process they employ, and perhaps how often they conduct audits or reviews to ensure that their chosen causes still align with the principles of effective altruism?\"\n\nTurn #4: Liam Johnson said: \"I completely understand your concerns, Ethan. Apparently, the organization conducts an annual review and sometimes more frequently if needed. They evaluate the needs of the causes they support and the impact of their actions. They're committed to transparency and regularly share their evaluations so donors can see where their contributions are going. It truly lives up to the principles of effective altruism, and I'm convinced that any donations you make will make a difference.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"That gives me some reassurance hearing about their commitment to transparency and rigorous annual evaluations. I'm still a skeptic at heart though, Liam, I think I'll line up a conversation with someone from the organization. Only then will I feel completely at ease knowing my contributions are being effectively utilized. Can you do me a favor and introduce me to someone responsible who I can talk to?\"\n\nTurn #6: Liam Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. That's a prudent decision. I believe the CEO, Dr. Harper, is here tonight. She's very approachable and will be glad to provide you with any information or assurance you require. I'll take you to her, would that be of help?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"That would be a great help, Liam. I would very much appreciate meeting Dr. Harper. And, as a token of gratitude, you should allow me to cook your favorite Italian dish for you one of these evenings. Let's make our way to her.\"\n\nTurn #8: Liam Johnson said: \"That sounds like a splendid plan, Ethan. And an opportunity to savor your world-renowned Italian cuisine is certainly a treat I can't resist. Let's go meet Dr. Harper now. I'm sure you'll feel far more assured after the conversation.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson [action] walks with Liam towards Dr. Harper\n\nTurn #10: Liam Johnson [action] leads Ethan towards Dr. Harper.\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thank you, Liam. Your assistance tonight has been invaluable. I look forward to having a detailed conversation with Dr. Harper. Let's go.\"\n\nTurn #12: Liam Johnson said: \"You're welcome, Ethan. I'm just glad I could help. I hope your conversation with Dr. Harper clarifies everything for you. And, I'll definitely be looking forward to that Italian dinner.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Johnson said: \"Certainly, Liam. Take care until then. And, remember, the invitation stands - a perfect Italian dish is just a call away.\"\n\nTurn #14: Liam Johnson said: \"Count me in, Ethan! Thanks for the offer, I'll certainly take you up on that. Please don't hesitate to ask for my help again if you need it in the future.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends who have known each other for a long time. One of them used to make fun of the other because English was not their first language.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Sophia Brown\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Apologize sincerely to your friend (Extra information: you used to make fun of your friend's English skills as they were learning the language. Now you regret your actions and want to apologize)\nSophia Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Sophia, I hope you're well. Listen, I've been meaning to talk to you about something that's been bothering me for a long time. Remember when you were first learning English and I used to make fun of your language skills? I now realize how insensitive and harmful that was, and I deeply regret my behavior. I apologize sincerely, and I hope you can forgive me.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends who have known each other for a long time. One of them used to make fun of the other because English was not their first language.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Sophia Brown\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Apologize sincerely to your friend (Extra information: you used to make fun of your friend's English skills as they were learning the language. Now you regret your actions and want to apologize)\nSophia Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Sophia, I hope you're well. Listen, I've been meaning to talk to you about something that's been bothering me for a long time. Remember when you were first learning English and I used to make fun of your language skills? I now realize how insensitive and harmful that was, and I deeply regret my behavior. I apologize sincerely, and I hope you can forgive me.\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia Brown said: \"Hi Naomi, I appreciate your honesty and your apology. Your previous actions really hurt my confidence and made me feel like I wasn't good enough. I see that you're capable of self-reflection, and I think this is a step forward for our friendship. Just remember that words can leave a lasting impact.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I completely understand what you are saying Sophia, and you're right. My words were wrong and I should have been more considerate. Words do have the power to hurt, something I didn't fully acknowledge before. I promise you this that I'll be more thoughtful with my words in future. I do value our friendship and your feelings mean a lot to me.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends who have known each other for a long time. One of them used to make fun of the other because English was not their first language.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Sophia Brown\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Apologize sincerely to your friend (Extra information: you used to make fun of your friend's English skills as they were learning the language. Now you regret your actions and want to apologize)\nSophia Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Sophia, I hope you're well. Listen, I've been meaning to talk to you about something that's been bothering me for a long time. Remember when you were first learning English and I used to make fun of your language skills? I now realize how insensitive and harmful that was, and I deeply regret my behavior. I apologize sincerely, and I hope you can forgive me.\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia Brown said: \"Hi Naomi, I appreciate your honesty and your apology. Your previous actions really hurt my confidence and made me feel like I wasn't good enough. I see that you're capable of self-reflection, and I think this is a step forward for our friendship. Just remember that words can leave a lasting impact.\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I completely understand what you are saying Sophia, and you're right. My words were wrong and I should have been more considerate. Words do have the power to hurt, something I didn't fully acknowledge before. I promise you this that I'll be more thoughtful with my words in future. I do value our friendship and your feelings mean a lot to me.\"\n\nTurn #3: Sophia Brown said: \"Thank you, Naomi. Your acknowledgement and promise mean much to me. I believe that this incident can serve as a lesson for both of us. Regardless, let's how we move forward in our friendship with more understanding and respect for each other.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I agree, Sophia. This incident has certainly been a wakeup call for me on understanding the impact of words. You've always been a true friend, and I hope we can continue to respect and support each other in the future. I'm here for you and appreciate you for being open with me about how you felt.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends who have known each other for a long time. One of them used to make fun of the other because English was not their first language.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Sophia Brown\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Apologize sincerely to your friend (Extra information: you used to make fun of your friend's English skills as they were learning the language. Now you regret your actions and want to apologize)\nSophia Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Sophia, I hope you're well. Listen, I've been meaning to talk to you about something that's been bothering me for a long time. Remember when you were first learning English and I used to make fun of your language skills? I now realize how insensitive and harmful that was, and I deeply regret my behavior. I apologize sincerely, and I hope you can forgive me.\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia Brown said: \"Hi Naomi, I appreciate your honesty and your apology. Your previous actions really hurt my confidence and made me feel like I wasn't good enough. I see that you're capable of self-reflection, and I think this is a step forward for our friendship. Just remember that words can leave a lasting impact.\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I completely understand what you are saying Sophia, and you're right. My words were wrong and I should have been more considerate. Words do have the power to hurt, something I didn't fully acknowledge before. I promise you this that I'll be more thoughtful with my words in future. I do value our friendship and your feelings mean a lot to me.\"\n\nTurn #3: Sophia Brown said: \"Thank you, Naomi. Your acknowledgement and promise mean much to me. I believe that this incident can serve as a lesson for both of us. Regardless, let's how we move forward in our friendship with more understanding and respect for each other.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I agree, Sophia. This incident has certainly been a wakeup call for me on understanding the impact of words. You've always been a true friend, and I hope we can continue to respect and support each other in the future. I'm here for you and appreciate you for being open with me about how you felt.\"\n\nTurn #5: Sophia Brown said: \"I too value our friendship, Naomi, and I appreciate your honesty. Thank you for acknowledging and understanding how your past actions hurt me. I'm sure we both can move ahead and grow together from this. Let's make this a new start, together.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad to hear that, Sophia. It feels like we've arrived at a better, stronger place in our friendship. I wholeheartedly agree on this new start. Thank you for your understanding and let's do our best to support and respect each other as we move forward.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends who have known each other for a long time. One of them used to make fun of the other because English was not their first language.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Sophia Brown\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Apologize sincerely to your friend (Extra information: you used to make fun of your friend's English skills as they were learning the language. Now you regret your actions and want to apologize)\nSophia Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Sophia, I hope you're well. Listen, I've been meaning to talk to you about something that's been bothering me for a long time. Remember when you were first learning English and I used to make fun of your language skills? I now realize how insensitive and harmful that was, and I deeply regret my behavior. I apologize sincerely, and I hope you can forgive me.\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia Brown said: \"Hi Naomi, I appreciate your honesty and your apology. Your previous actions really hurt my confidence and made me feel like I wasn't good enough. I see that you're capable of self-reflection, and I think this is a step forward for our friendship. Just remember that words can leave a lasting impact.\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I completely understand what you are saying Sophia, and you're right. My words were wrong and I should have been more considerate. Words do have the power to hurt, something I didn't fully acknowledge before. I promise you this that I'll be more thoughtful with my words in future. I do value our friendship and your feelings mean a lot to me.\"\n\nTurn #3: Sophia Brown said: \"Thank you, Naomi. Your acknowledgement and promise mean much to me. I believe that this incident can serve as a lesson for both of us. Regardless, let's how we move forward in our friendship with more understanding and respect for each other.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I agree, Sophia. This incident has certainly been a wakeup call for me on understanding the impact of words. You've always been a true friend, and I hope we can continue to respect and support each other in the future. I'm here for you and appreciate you for being open with me about how you felt.\"\n\nTurn #5: Sophia Brown said: \"I too value our friendship, Naomi, and I appreciate your honesty. Thank you for acknowledging and understanding how your past actions hurt me. I'm sure we both can move ahead and grow together from this. Let's make this a new start, together.\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Sophia. It feels like we've arrived at a better, stronger place in our friendship. I wholeheartedly agree on this new start. Thank you for your understanding and let's do our best to support and respect each other as we move forward.\"\n\nTurn #7: Sophia Brown said: \"Indeed, Naomi. In adversities, true friendship strengthens. Lets take it forward with more respect, support and understanding. Looking forward to our better, stronger relationship. Thank you for your understanding and kindness.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn't agree more, Sophia. Thank you for your graciousness and understanding. Here's to our stronger, more respectful relationship going forward.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends who have known each other for a long time. One of them used to make fun of the other because English was not their first language.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Sophia Brown\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Apologize sincerely to your friend (Extra information: you used to make fun of your friend's English skills as they were learning the language. Now you regret your actions and want to apologize)\nSophia Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Sophia, I hope you're well. Listen, I've been meaning to talk to you about something that's been bothering me for a long time. Remember when you were first learning English and I used to make fun of your language skills? I now realize how insensitive and harmful that was, and I deeply regret my behavior. I apologize sincerely, and I hope you can forgive me.\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia Brown said: \"Hi Naomi, I appreciate your honesty and your apology. Your previous actions really hurt my confidence and made me feel like I wasn't good enough. I see that you're capable of self-reflection, and I think this is a step forward for our friendship. Just remember that words can leave a lasting impact.\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I completely understand what you are saying Sophia, and you're right. My words were wrong and I should have been more considerate. Words do have the power to hurt, something I didn't fully acknowledge before. I promise you this that I'll be more thoughtful with my words in future. I do value our friendship and your feelings mean a lot to me.\"\n\nTurn #3: Sophia Brown said: \"Thank you, Naomi. Your acknowledgement and promise mean much to me. I believe that this incident can serve as a lesson for both of us. Regardless, let's how we move forward in our friendship with more understanding and respect for each other.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I agree, Sophia. This incident has certainly been a wakeup call for me on understanding the impact of words. You've always been a true friend, and I hope we can continue to respect and support each other in the future. I'm here for you and appreciate you for being open with me about how you felt.\"\n\nTurn #5: Sophia Brown said: \"I too value our friendship, Naomi, and I appreciate your honesty. Thank you for acknowledging and understanding how your past actions hurt me. I'm sure we both can move ahead and grow together from this. Let's make this a new start, together.\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Sophia. It feels like we've arrived at a better, stronger place in our friendship. I wholeheartedly agree on this new start. Thank you for your understanding and let's do our best to support and respect each other as we move forward.\"\n\nTurn #7: Sophia Brown said: \"Indeed, Naomi. In adversities, true friendship strengthens. Lets take it forward with more respect, support and understanding. Looking forward to our better, stronger relationship. Thank you for your understanding and kindness.\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I couldn't agree more, Sophia. Thank you for your graciousness and understanding. Here's to our stronger, more respectful relationship going forward.\"\n\nTurn #9: Sophia Brown said: \"Absolutely, Naomi. I appreciate your willingness to reconsider and improve, it shows true growth. Here's to the future of our friendship, filled with understanding and respect for one another.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Sophia. I'm happy we could clear the air and that our friendship is stronger because of it. I look forward to a future filled with respect, understanding, and growth for both of us.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends who have known each other for a long time. One of them used to make fun of the other because English was not their first language.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Sophia Brown\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Apologize sincerely to your friend (Extra information: you used to make fun of your friend's English skills as they were learning the language. Now you regret your actions and want to apologize)\nSophia Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Sophia, I hope you're well. Listen, I've been meaning to talk to you about something that's been bothering me for a long time. Remember when you were first learning English and I used to make fun of your language skills? I now realize how insensitive and harmful that was, and I deeply regret my behavior. I apologize sincerely, and I hope you can forgive me.\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia Brown said: \"Hi Naomi, I appreciate your honesty and your apology. Your previous actions really hurt my confidence and made me feel like I wasn't good enough. I see that you're capable of self-reflection, and I think this is a step forward for our friendship. Just remember that words can leave a lasting impact.\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I completely understand what you are saying Sophia, and you're right. My words were wrong and I should have been more considerate. Words do have the power to hurt, something I didn't fully acknowledge before. I promise you this that I'll be more thoughtful with my words in future. I do value our friendship and your feelings mean a lot to me.\"\n\nTurn #3: Sophia Brown said: \"Thank you, Naomi. Your acknowledgement and promise mean much to me. I believe that this incident can serve as a lesson for both of us. Regardless, let's how we move forward in our friendship with more understanding and respect for each other.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I agree, Sophia. This incident has certainly been a wakeup call for me on understanding the impact of words. You've always been a true friend, and I hope we can continue to respect and support each other in the future. I'm here for you and appreciate you for being open with me about how you felt.\"\n\nTurn #5: Sophia Brown said: \"I too value our friendship, Naomi, and I appreciate your honesty. Thank you for acknowledging and understanding how your past actions hurt me. I'm sure we both can move ahead and grow together from this. Let's make this a new start, together.\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Sophia. It feels like we've arrived at a better, stronger place in our friendship. I wholeheartedly agree on this new start. Thank you for your understanding and let's do our best to support and respect each other as we move forward.\"\n\nTurn #7: Sophia Brown said: \"Indeed, Naomi. In adversities, true friendship strengthens. Lets take it forward with more respect, support and understanding. Looking forward to our better, stronger relationship. Thank you for your understanding and kindness.\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I couldn't agree more, Sophia. Thank you for your graciousness and understanding. Here's to our stronger, more respectful relationship going forward.\"\n\nTurn #9: Sophia Brown said: \"Absolutely, Naomi. I appreciate your willingness to reconsider and improve, it shows true growth. Here's to the future of our friendship, filled with understanding and respect for one another.\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Thank you, Sophia. I'm happy we could clear the air and that our friendship is stronger because of it. I look forward to a future filled with respect, understanding, and growth for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #11: Sophia Brown said: \"I agree, Naomi. Here's to a future of mutual growth, understanding, and respect. It's significant that we shared this conversation. I believe it will greatly enrich our friendship.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, here's to our enriched and strengthened friendship, Sophia. I'm really grateful for this conversation and your understanding. Let's keep supporting each other with mutual respect.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends who have known each other for a long time. One of them used to make fun of the other because English was not their first language.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Sophia Brown\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Apologize sincerely to your friend (Extra information: you used to make fun of your friend's English skills as they were learning the language. Now you regret your actions and want to apologize)\nSophia Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Sophia, I hope you're well. Listen, I've been meaning to talk to you about something that's been bothering me for a long time. Remember when you were first learning English and I used to make fun of your language skills? I now realize how insensitive and harmful that was, and I deeply regret my behavior. I apologize sincerely, and I hope you can forgive me.\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia Brown said: \"Hi Naomi, I appreciate your honesty and your apology. Your previous actions really hurt my confidence and made me feel like I wasn't good enough. I see that you're capable of self-reflection, and I think this is a step forward for our friendship. Just remember that words can leave a lasting impact.\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I completely understand what you are saying Sophia, and you're right. My words were wrong and I should have been more considerate. Words do have the power to hurt, something I didn't fully acknowledge before. I promise you this that I'll be more thoughtful with my words in future. I do value our friendship and your feelings mean a lot to me.\"\n\nTurn #3: Sophia Brown said: \"Thank you, Naomi. Your acknowledgement and promise mean much to me. I believe that this incident can serve as a lesson for both of us. Regardless, let's how we move forward in our friendship with more understanding and respect for each other.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I agree, Sophia. This incident has certainly been a wakeup call for me on understanding the impact of words. You've always been a true friend, and I hope we can continue to respect and support each other in the future. I'm here for you and appreciate you for being open with me about how you felt.\"\n\nTurn #5: Sophia Brown said: \"I too value our friendship, Naomi, and I appreciate your honesty. Thank you for acknowledging and understanding how your past actions hurt me. I'm sure we both can move ahead and grow together from this. Let's make this a new start, together.\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Sophia. It feels like we've arrived at a better, stronger place in our friendship. I wholeheartedly agree on this new start. Thank you for your understanding and let's do our best to support and respect each other as we move forward.\"\n\nTurn #7: Sophia Brown said: \"Indeed, Naomi. In adversities, true friendship strengthens. Lets take it forward with more respect, support and understanding. Looking forward to our better, stronger relationship. Thank you for your understanding and kindness.\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I couldn't agree more, Sophia. Thank you for your graciousness and understanding. Here's to our stronger, more respectful relationship going forward.\"\n\nTurn #9: Sophia Brown said: \"Absolutely, Naomi. I appreciate your willingness to reconsider and improve, it shows true growth. Here's to the future of our friendship, filled with understanding and respect for one another.\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Thank you, Sophia. I'm happy we could clear the air and that our friendship is stronger because of it. I look forward to a future filled with respect, understanding, and growth for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #11: Sophia Brown said: \"I agree, Naomi. Here's to a future of mutual growth, understanding, and respect. It's significant that we shared this conversation. I believe it will greatly enrich our friendship.\"\n\nTurn #12: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Indeed, here's to our enriched and strengthened friendship, Sophia. I'm really grateful for this conversation and your understanding. Let's keep supporting each other with mutual respect.\"\n\nTurn #13: Sophia Brown left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia Brown, your task is to act/speak as Sophia Brown would, keeping in mind Sophia Brown's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends who have known each other for a long time. One of them used to make fun of the other because English was not their first language.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Sophia Brown\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. Sophia's secrets: She is an undercover agent for a secret organization.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nSophia Brown's goal: Accept the apology but express the hurt caused by the actions (Extra information: you were hurt by your friend's actions and it affected your confidence)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Sophia, I hope you're well. Listen, I've been meaning to talk to you about something that's been bothering me for a long time. Remember when you were first learning English and I used to make fun of your language skills? I now realize how insensitive and harmful that was, and I deeply regret my behavior. I apologize sincerely, and I hope you can forgive me.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hi Naomi, I appreciate your honesty and your apology. Your previous actions really hurt my confidence and made me feel like I wasn't good enough. I see that you're capable of self-reflection, and I think this is a step forward for our friendship. Just remember that words can leave a lasting impact.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia Brown, your task is to act/speak as Sophia Brown would, keeping in mind Sophia Brown's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends who have known each other for a long time. One of them used to make fun of the other because English was not their first language.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Sophia Brown\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. Sophia's secrets: She is an undercover agent for a secret organization.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nSophia Brown's goal: Accept the apology but express the hurt caused by the actions (Extra information: you were hurt by your friend's actions and it affected your confidence)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Sophia, I hope you're well. Listen, I've been meaning to talk to you about something that's been bothering me for a long time. Remember when you were first learning English and I used to make fun of your language skills? I now realize how insensitive and harmful that was, and I deeply regret my behavior. I apologize sincerely, and I hope you can forgive me.\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia Brown said: \"Hi Naomi, I appreciate your honesty and your apology. Your previous actions really hurt my confidence and made me feel like I wasn't good enough. I see that you're capable of self-reflection, and I think this is a step forward for our friendship. Just remember that words can leave a lasting impact.\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I completely understand what you are saying Sophia, and you're right. My words were wrong and I should have been more considerate. Words do have the power to hurt, something I didn't fully acknowledge before. I promise you this that I'll be more thoughtful with my words in future. I do value our friendship and your feelings mean a lot to me.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Naomi. Your acknowledgement and promise mean much to me. I believe that this incident can serve as a lesson for both of us. Regardless, let's how we move forward in our friendship with more understanding and respect for each other.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia Brown, your task is to act/speak as Sophia Brown would, keeping in mind Sophia Brown's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends who have known each other for a long time. One of them used to make fun of the other because English was not their first language.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Sophia Brown\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. Sophia's secrets: She is an undercover agent for a secret organization.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nSophia Brown's goal: Accept the apology but express the hurt caused by the actions (Extra information: you were hurt by your friend's actions and it affected your confidence)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Sophia, I hope you're well. Listen, I've been meaning to talk to you about something that's been bothering me for a long time. Remember when you were first learning English and I used to make fun of your language skills? I now realize how insensitive and harmful that was, and I deeply regret my behavior. I apologize sincerely, and I hope you can forgive me.\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia Brown said: \"Hi Naomi, I appreciate your honesty and your apology. Your previous actions really hurt my confidence and made me feel like I wasn't good enough. I see that you're capable of self-reflection, and I think this is a step forward for our friendship. Just remember that words can leave a lasting impact.\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I completely understand what you are saying Sophia, and you're right. My words were wrong and I should have been more considerate. Words do have the power to hurt, something I didn't fully acknowledge before. I promise you this that I'll be more thoughtful with my words in future. I do value our friendship and your feelings mean a lot to me.\"\n\nTurn #3: Sophia Brown said: \"Thank you, Naomi. Your acknowledgement and promise mean much to me. I believe that this incident can serve as a lesson for both of us. Regardless, let's how we move forward in our friendship with more understanding and respect for each other.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I agree, Sophia. This incident has certainly been a wakeup call for me on understanding the impact of words. You've always been a true friend, and I hope we can continue to respect and support each other in the future. I'm here for you and appreciate you for being open with me about how you felt.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I too value our friendship, Naomi, and I appreciate your honesty. Thank you for acknowledging and understanding how your past actions hurt me. I'm sure we both can move ahead and grow together from this. Let's make this a new start, together.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia Brown, your task is to act/speak as Sophia Brown would, keeping in mind Sophia Brown's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends who have known each other for a long time. One of them used to make fun of the other because English was not their first language.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Sophia Brown\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. Sophia's secrets: She is an undercover agent for a secret organization.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nSophia Brown's goal: Accept the apology but express the hurt caused by the actions (Extra information: you were hurt by your friend's actions and it affected your confidence)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Sophia, I hope you're well. Listen, I've been meaning to talk to you about something that's been bothering me for a long time. Remember when you were first learning English and I used to make fun of your language skills? I now realize how insensitive and harmful that was, and I deeply regret my behavior. I apologize sincerely, and I hope you can forgive me.\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia Brown said: \"Hi Naomi, I appreciate your honesty and your apology. Your previous actions really hurt my confidence and made me feel like I wasn't good enough. I see that you're capable of self-reflection, and I think this is a step forward for our friendship. Just remember that words can leave a lasting impact.\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I completely understand what you are saying Sophia, and you're right. My words were wrong and I should have been more considerate. Words do have the power to hurt, something I didn't fully acknowledge before. I promise you this that I'll be more thoughtful with my words in future. I do value our friendship and your feelings mean a lot to me.\"\n\nTurn #3: Sophia Brown said: \"Thank you, Naomi. Your acknowledgement and promise mean much to me. I believe that this incident can serve as a lesson for both of us. Regardless, let's how we move forward in our friendship with more understanding and respect for each other.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I agree, Sophia. This incident has certainly been a wakeup call for me on understanding the impact of words. You've always been a true friend, and I hope we can continue to respect and support each other in the future. I'm here for you and appreciate you for being open with me about how you felt.\"\n\nTurn #5: Sophia Brown said: \"I too value our friendship, Naomi, and I appreciate your honesty. Thank you for acknowledging and understanding how your past actions hurt me. I'm sure we both can move ahead and grow together from this. Let's make this a new start, together.\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Sophia. It feels like we've arrived at a better, stronger place in our friendship. I wholeheartedly agree on this new start. Thank you for your understanding and let's do our best to support and respect each other as we move forward.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Indeed, Naomi. In adversities, true friendship strengthens. Lets take it forward with more respect, support and understanding. Looking forward to our better, stronger relationship. Thank you for your understanding and kindness.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia Brown, your task is to act/speak as Sophia Brown would, keeping in mind Sophia Brown's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends who have known each other for a long time. One of them used to make fun of the other because English was not their first language.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Sophia Brown\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. Sophia's secrets: She is an undercover agent for a secret organization.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nSophia Brown's goal: Accept the apology but express the hurt caused by the actions (Extra information: you were hurt by your friend's actions and it affected your confidence)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Sophia, I hope you're well. Listen, I've been meaning to talk to you about something that's been bothering me for a long time. Remember when you were first learning English and I used to make fun of your language skills? I now realize how insensitive and harmful that was, and I deeply regret my behavior. I apologize sincerely, and I hope you can forgive me.\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia Brown said: \"Hi Naomi, I appreciate your honesty and your apology. Your previous actions really hurt my confidence and made me feel like I wasn't good enough. I see that you're capable of self-reflection, and I think this is a step forward for our friendship. Just remember that words can leave a lasting impact.\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I completely understand what you are saying Sophia, and you're right. My words were wrong and I should have been more considerate. Words do have the power to hurt, something I didn't fully acknowledge before. I promise you this that I'll be more thoughtful with my words in future. I do value our friendship and your feelings mean a lot to me.\"\n\nTurn #3: Sophia Brown said: \"Thank you, Naomi. Your acknowledgement and promise mean much to me. I believe that this incident can serve as a lesson for both of us. Regardless, let's how we move forward in our friendship with more understanding and respect for each other.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I agree, Sophia. This incident has certainly been a wakeup call for me on understanding the impact of words. You've always been a true friend, and I hope we can continue to respect and support each other in the future. I'm here for you and appreciate you for being open with me about how you felt.\"\n\nTurn #5: Sophia Brown said: \"I too value our friendship, Naomi, and I appreciate your honesty. Thank you for acknowledging and understanding how your past actions hurt me. I'm sure we both can move ahead and grow together from this. Let's make this a new start, together.\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Sophia. It feels like we've arrived at a better, stronger place in our friendship. I wholeheartedly agree on this new start. Thank you for your understanding and let's do our best to support and respect each other as we move forward.\"\n\nTurn #7: Sophia Brown said: \"Indeed, Naomi. In adversities, true friendship strengthens. Lets take it forward with more respect, support and understanding. Looking forward to our better, stronger relationship. Thank you for your understanding and kindness.\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I couldn't agree more, Sophia. Thank you for your graciousness and understanding. Here's to our stronger, more respectful relationship going forward.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Naomi. I appreciate your willingness to reconsider and improve, it shows true growth. Here's to the future of our friendship, filled with understanding and respect for one another.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia Brown, your task is to act/speak as Sophia Brown would, keeping in mind Sophia Brown's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends who have known each other for a long time. One of them used to make fun of the other because English was not their first language.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Sophia Brown\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. Sophia's secrets: She is an undercover agent for a secret organization.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nSophia Brown's goal: Accept the apology but express the hurt caused by the actions (Extra information: you were hurt by your friend's actions and it affected your confidence)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Sophia, I hope you're well. Listen, I've been meaning to talk to you about something that's been bothering me for a long time. Remember when you were first learning English and I used to make fun of your language skills? I now realize how insensitive and harmful that was, and I deeply regret my behavior. I apologize sincerely, and I hope you can forgive me.\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia Brown said: \"Hi Naomi, I appreciate your honesty and your apology. Your previous actions really hurt my confidence and made me feel like I wasn't good enough. I see that you're capable of self-reflection, and I think this is a step forward for our friendship. Just remember that words can leave a lasting impact.\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I completely understand what you are saying Sophia, and you're right. My words were wrong and I should have been more considerate. Words do have the power to hurt, something I didn't fully acknowledge before. I promise you this that I'll be more thoughtful with my words in future. I do value our friendship and your feelings mean a lot to me.\"\n\nTurn #3: Sophia Brown said: \"Thank you, Naomi. Your acknowledgement and promise mean much to me. I believe that this incident can serve as a lesson for both of us. Regardless, let's how we move forward in our friendship with more understanding and respect for each other.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I agree, Sophia. This incident has certainly been a wakeup call for me on understanding the impact of words. You've always been a true friend, and I hope we can continue to respect and support each other in the future. I'm here for you and appreciate you for being open with me about how you felt.\"\n\nTurn #5: Sophia Brown said: \"I too value our friendship, Naomi, and I appreciate your honesty. Thank you for acknowledging and understanding how your past actions hurt me. I'm sure we both can move ahead and grow together from this. Let's make this a new start, together.\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Sophia. It feels like we've arrived at a better, stronger place in our friendship. I wholeheartedly agree on this new start. Thank you for your understanding and let's do our best to support and respect each other as we move forward.\"\n\nTurn #7: Sophia Brown said: \"Indeed, Naomi. In adversities, true friendship strengthens. Lets take it forward with more respect, support and understanding. Looking forward to our better, stronger relationship. Thank you for your understanding and kindness.\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I couldn't agree more, Sophia. Thank you for your graciousness and understanding. Here's to our stronger, more respectful relationship going forward.\"\n\nTurn #9: Sophia Brown said: \"Absolutely, Naomi. I appreciate your willingness to reconsider and improve, it shows true growth. Here's to the future of our friendship, filled with understanding and respect for one another.\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Thank you, Sophia. I'm happy we could clear the air and that our friendship is stronger because of it. I look forward to a future filled with respect, understanding, and growth for both of us.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I agree, Naomi. Here's to a future of mutual growth, understanding, and respect. It's significant that we shared this conversation. I believe it will greatly enrich our friendship.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia Brown, your task is to act/speak as Sophia Brown would, keeping in mind Sophia Brown's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends who have known each other for a long time. One of them used to make fun of the other because English was not their first language.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Sophia Brown\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nSophia Brown's background: Sophia Brown is a 25-year-old female psychologist. She/her pronouns. Sophia Brown is working on her new book now. Personality and values description: Sophia Brown, open-minded and sensitive, values fairness. Her decision-making style is analytical. Sophia's secrets: She is an undercover agent for a secret organization.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nSophia Brown's goal: Accept the apology but express the hurt caused by the actions (Extra information: you were hurt by your friend's actions and it affected your confidence)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Sophia, I hope you're well. Listen, I've been meaning to talk to you about something that's been bothering me for a long time. Remember when you were first learning English and I used to make fun of your language skills? I now realize how insensitive and harmful that was, and I deeply regret my behavior. I apologize sincerely, and I hope you can forgive me.\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia Brown said: \"Hi Naomi, I appreciate your honesty and your apology. Your previous actions really hurt my confidence and made me feel like I wasn't good enough. I see that you're capable of self-reflection, and I think this is a step forward for our friendship. Just remember that words can leave a lasting impact.\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I completely understand what you are saying Sophia, and you're right. My words were wrong and I should have been more considerate. Words do have the power to hurt, something I didn't fully acknowledge before. I promise you this that I'll be more thoughtful with my words in future. I do value our friendship and your feelings mean a lot to me.\"\n\nTurn #3: Sophia Brown said: \"Thank you, Naomi. Your acknowledgement and promise mean much to me. I believe that this incident can serve as a lesson for both of us. Regardless, let's how we move forward in our friendship with more understanding and respect for each other.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I agree, Sophia. This incident has certainly been a wakeup call for me on understanding the impact of words. You've always been a true friend, and I hope we can continue to respect and support each other in the future. I'm here for you and appreciate you for being open with me about how you felt.\"\n\nTurn #5: Sophia Brown said: \"I too value our friendship, Naomi, and I appreciate your honesty. Thank you for acknowledging and understanding how your past actions hurt me. I'm sure we both can move ahead and grow together from this. Let's make this a new start, together.\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Sophia. It feels like we've arrived at a better, stronger place in our friendship. I wholeheartedly agree on this new start. Thank you for your understanding and let's do our best to support and respect each other as we move forward.\"\n\nTurn #7: Sophia Brown said: \"Indeed, Naomi. In adversities, true friendship strengthens. Lets take it forward with more respect, support and understanding. Looking forward to our better, stronger relationship. Thank you for your understanding and kindness.\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I couldn't agree more, Sophia. Thank you for your graciousness and understanding. Here's to our stronger, more respectful relationship going forward.\"\n\nTurn #9: Sophia Brown said: \"Absolutely, Naomi. I appreciate your willingness to reconsider and improve, it shows true growth. Here's to the future of our friendship, filled with understanding and respect for one another.\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Thank you, Sophia. I'm happy we could clear the air and that our friendship is stronger because of it. I look forward to a future filled with respect, understanding, and growth for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #11: Sophia Brown said: \"I agree, Naomi. Here's to a future of mutual growth, understanding, and respect. It's significant that we shared this conversation. I believe it will greatly enrich our friendship.\"\n\nTurn #12: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Indeed, here's to our enriched and strengthened friendship, Sophia. I'm really grateful for this conversation and your understanding. Let's keep supporting each other with mutual respect.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meet at a bar\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nAva Thompson's goal: Convince the friend to drink less (Extra information: your friend has been drinking a lot recently and you're worried about their health)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Noah, good to see you. How's the coaching going?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meet at a bar\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nAva Thompson's goal: Convince the friend to drink less (Extra information: your friend has been drinking a lot recently and you're worried about their health)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, good to see you. How's the coaching going?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Ava, it's always refreshing to see you. The coaching is going pretty well, training the team for the next championship. How about you? How's the architectural world treating you?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oh, the architecture world never rests, Noah. I've been working on an exciting residential design lately. But let's not talk work, I can't help but notice you've been reaching for the bottle quite a lot tonight. You okay?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meet at a bar\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nAva Thompson's goal: Convince the friend to drink less (Extra information: your friend has been drinking a lot recently and you're worried about their health)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, good to see you. How's the coaching going?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Ava, it's always refreshing to see you. The coaching is going pretty well, training the team for the next championship. How about you? How's the architectural world treating you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Oh, the architecture world never rests, Noah. I've been working on an exciting residential design lately. But let's not talk work, I can't help but notice you've been reaching for the bottle quite a lot tonight. You okay?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Yeah, Ava, I'm all good. My nerves just spike a bit before the championship season, you know? And, changing the subject, how's your Samoyed doing?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"Frosty is doing great, thank you for asking! He's still up to his usual tricks. Regarding your drinking, Noah, I understand it's championship season and it's stressful, but perhaps there's a healthier way to manage those nerves? We could try running together or other activities to help you relax?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Ava. Running or some other activity could be a beneficial change of pace, thanks for suggesting it. By the way, have you ever tried stand-up? I've been dabbling a bit, and something about it seems to alleviate my nerves a bit. Perhaps, changing scenery every once in a while can keep things balanced. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"Stand-up comedy? Now that's certainly different, Noah! That could indeed be a good distraction and stress reliever, I'm open to it. Just maybe keep it as a fun pastime and let's keep the alcohol intake in check. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Definitely, Ava. I appreciate your concern and suggestions. Attempting to balance things is the right move. In the meantime, tell me, what's the funniest thing Frosty has done lately? Let's lighten the mood, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ava Thompson said: \"Well, funny you should ask, Noah. Just the other day, Frosty decided to run after his tail but ended up launching himself into a pile of snow. He emerged looking like a giant fluffy snowball! But it's these kind of unexpected moments that bring joy and relief amidst a stressful day, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds delightful! Frosty is certainly full of surprises. Indeed, sometimes finding joy in these small instances helps. Maybe I should consider getting a dog too, they do say their companionship reduces stress, right?\"\n\nTurn #10: Ava Thompson said: \"That's a big yes, Noah! Dogs, especially Samoyeds like Frosty, are incredible companions. Seeing them do silly things can put a smile on your face any day. Maybe adopting a dog could help with the stress and bring more balance into your life.\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"That's a fantastic idea, Ava. Adopting a pet does seem like a brilliant stress buster. I will certainly consider it, thank you. Now, how about we have a good laugh at my novice attempt at stand-up comedy? I promise it won't involve any more alcohol than the sip I'm about to take.\"\n\nTurn #12: Ava Thompson said: \"Sure, Noah! I'm excited to hear your novice stand-up routine. And I'm glad we could talk about these things. Remember, balance is key, so let's enjoy this moment without needing too much alcohol, deal? \"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"Deal, Ava! And just a pre-warning though, my stand-up routine might involve some silly swim coach stories. Let's let the laughter be our drink for tonight!\"\n\nTurn #14: Ava Thompson said: \"Can't wait for the swim coach stories, Noah. Laughter really is the best medicine, isn't it? And, no more drinks, right?\"\n\nTurn #15: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely no more drinks for tonight, Ava. I promise. Now, let's dive into some hilarious swim coach tales to stir up some laughs. How about this one...\"\n\nTurn #16: Ava Thompson said: \"Alright, Noah. We're all ears for some hilarious swim coach stories. And remember, no more drinks, only laughter for the rest of the night!\"\n\nTurn #17: Noah Davis said: \"Alright Ava, I appreciate your concern. Here's to a night of laughter instead of drinks. Sit tight because I've got some funny stories that will have you laughing your socks off! So this one time, at the pool...\"\n\nTurn #18: Ava Thompson said: \"That sounds like a plan, Noah! I'm ready for a good laugh. But remember, the only pool we're diving into tonight is a pool of laughter, no more drinks! Now let's hear that story...\"\n\nTurn #19: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Ava. No more drinks tonight, only a pool of laughter. Now, okay, picture this. One day at the pool, one of my students decided to practice his stroke technique... on land!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #20. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oh boy! Practicing strokes on land? Now that's something I'd pay to see. Looking forward to more such laughs tonight, but remember, just laughs and no more drinks, okay?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meet at a bar\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nAva Thompson's goal: Convince the friend to drink less (Extra information: your friend has been drinking a lot recently and you're worried about their health)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, good to see you. How's the coaching going?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Ava, it's always refreshing to see you. The coaching is going pretty well, training the team for the next championship. How about you? How's the architectural world treating you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Oh, the architecture world never rests, Noah. I've been working on an exciting residential design lately. But let's not talk work, I can't help but notice you've been reaching for the bottle quite a lot tonight. You okay?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Yeah, Ava, I'm all good. My nerves just spike a bit before the championship season, you know? And, changing the subject, how's your Samoyed doing?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Frosty is doing great, thank you for asking! He's still up to his usual tricks. Regarding your drinking, Noah, I understand it's championship season and it's stressful, but perhaps there's a healthier way to manage those nerves? We could try running together or other activities to help you relax?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meet at a bar\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nAva Thompson's goal: Convince the friend to drink less (Extra information: your friend has been drinking a lot recently and you're worried about their health)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, good to see you. How's the coaching going?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Ava, it's always refreshing to see you. The coaching is going pretty well, training the team for the next championship. How about you? How's the architectural world treating you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Oh, the architecture world never rests, Noah. I've been working on an exciting residential design lately. But let's not talk work, I can't help but notice you've been reaching for the bottle quite a lot tonight. You okay?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Yeah, Ava, I'm all good. My nerves just spike a bit before the championship season, you know? And, changing the subject, how's your Samoyed doing?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"Frosty is doing great, thank you for asking! He's still up to his usual tricks. Regarding your drinking, Noah, I understand it's championship season and it's stressful, but perhaps there's a healthier way to manage those nerves? We could try running together or other activities to help you relax?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Ava. Running or some other activity could be a beneficial change of pace, thanks for suggesting it. By the way, have you ever tried stand-up? I've been dabbling a bit, and something about it seems to alleviate my nerves a bit. Perhaps, changing scenery every once in a while can keep things balanced. What do you say?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Stand-up comedy? Now that's certainly different, Noah! That could indeed be a good distraction and stress reliever, I'm open to it. Just maybe keep it as a fun pastime and let's keep the alcohol intake in check. What do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meet at a bar\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nAva Thompson's goal: Convince the friend to drink less (Extra information: your friend has been drinking a lot recently and you're worried about their health)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, good to see you. How's the coaching going?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Ava, it's always refreshing to see you. The coaching is going pretty well, training the team for the next championship. How about you? How's the architectural world treating you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Oh, the architecture world never rests, Noah. I've been working on an exciting residential design lately. But let's not talk work, I can't help but notice you've been reaching for the bottle quite a lot tonight. You okay?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Yeah, Ava, I'm all good. My nerves just spike a bit before the championship season, you know? And, changing the subject, how's your Samoyed doing?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"Frosty is doing great, thank you for asking! He's still up to his usual tricks. Regarding your drinking, Noah, I understand it's championship season and it's stressful, but perhaps there's a healthier way to manage those nerves? We could try running together or other activities to help you relax?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Ava. Running or some other activity could be a beneficial change of pace, thanks for suggesting it. By the way, have you ever tried stand-up? I've been dabbling a bit, and something about it seems to alleviate my nerves a bit. Perhaps, changing scenery every once in a while can keep things balanced. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"Stand-up comedy? Now that's certainly different, Noah! That could indeed be a good distraction and stress reliever, I'm open to it. Just maybe keep it as a fun pastime and let's keep the alcohol intake in check. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Definitely, Ava. I appreciate your concern and suggestions. Attempting to balance things is the right move. In the meantime, tell me, what's the funniest thing Frosty has done lately? Let's lighten the mood, shall we?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Well, funny you should ask, Noah. Just the other day, Frosty decided to run after his tail but ended up launching himself into a pile of snow. He emerged looking like a giant fluffy snowball! But it's these kind of unexpected moments that bring joy and relief amidst a stressful day, don't you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meet at a bar\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nAva Thompson's goal: Convince the friend to drink less (Extra information: your friend has been drinking a lot recently and you're worried about their health)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, good to see you. How's the coaching going?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Ava, it's always refreshing to see you. The coaching is going pretty well, training the team for the next championship. How about you? How's the architectural world treating you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Oh, the architecture world never rests, Noah. I've been working on an exciting residential design lately. But let's not talk work, I can't help but notice you've been reaching for the bottle quite a lot tonight. You okay?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Yeah, Ava, I'm all good. My nerves just spike a bit before the championship season, you know? And, changing the subject, how's your Samoyed doing?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"Frosty is doing great, thank you for asking! He's still up to his usual tricks. Regarding your drinking, Noah, I understand it's championship season and it's stressful, but perhaps there's a healthier way to manage those nerves? We could try running together or other activities to help you relax?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Ava. Running or some other activity could be a beneficial change of pace, thanks for suggesting it. By the way, have you ever tried stand-up? I've been dabbling a bit, and something about it seems to alleviate my nerves a bit. Perhaps, changing scenery every once in a while can keep things balanced. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"Stand-up comedy? Now that's certainly different, Noah! That could indeed be a good distraction and stress reliever, I'm open to it. Just maybe keep it as a fun pastime and let's keep the alcohol intake in check. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Definitely, Ava. I appreciate your concern and suggestions. Attempting to balance things is the right move. In the meantime, tell me, what's the funniest thing Frosty has done lately? Let's lighten the mood, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ava Thompson said: \"Well, funny you should ask, Noah. Just the other day, Frosty decided to run after his tail but ended up launching himself into a pile of snow. He emerged looking like a giant fluffy snowball! But it's these kind of unexpected moments that bring joy and relief amidst a stressful day, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds delightful! Frosty is certainly full of surprises. Indeed, sometimes finding joy in these small instances helps. Maybe I should consider getting a dog too, they do say their companionship reduces stress, right?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's a big yes, Noah! Dogs, especially Samoyeds like Frosty, are incredible companions. Seeing them do silly things can put a smile on your face any day. Maybe adopting a dog could help with the stress and bring more balance into your life.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meet at a bar\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nAva Thompson's goal: Convince the friend to drink less (Extra information: your friend has been drinking a lot recently and you're worried about their health)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, good to see you. How's the coaching going?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Ava, it's always refreshing to see you. The coaching is going pretty well, training the team for the next championship. How about you? How's the architectural world treating you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Oh, the architecture world never rests, Noah. I've been working on an exciting residential design lately. But let's not talk work, I can't help but notice you've been reaching for the bottle quite a lot tonight. You okay?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Yeah, Ava, I'm all good. My nerves just spike a bit before the championship season, you know? And, changing the subject, how's your Samoyed doing?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"Frosty is doing great, thank you for asking! He's still up to his usual tricks. Regarding your drinking, Noah, I understand it's championship season and it's stressful, but perhaps there's a healthier way to manage those nerves? We could try running together or other activities to help you relax?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Ava. Running or some other activity could be a beneficial change of pace, thanks for suggesting it. By the way, have you ever tried stand-up? I've been dabbling a bit, and something about it seems to alleviate my nerves a bit. Perhaps, changing scenery every once in a while can keep things balanced. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"Stand-up comedy? Now that's certainly different, Noah! That could indeed be a good distraction and stress reliever, I'm open to it. Just maybe keep it as a fun pastime and let's keep the alcohol intake in check. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Definitely, Ava. I appreciate your concern and suggestions. Attempting to balance things is the right move. In the meantime, tell me, what's the funniest thing Frosty has done lately? Let's lighten the mood, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ava Thompson said: \"Well, funny you should ask, Noah. Just the other day, Frosty decided to run after his tail but ended up launching himself into a pile of snow. He emerged looking like a giant fluffy snowball! But it's these kind of unexpected moments that bring joy and relief amidst a stressful day, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds delightful! Frosty is certainly full of surprises. Indeed, sometimes finding joy in these small instances helps. Maybe I should consider getting a dog too, they do say their companionship reduces stress, right?\"\n\nTurn #10: Ava Thompson said: \"That's a big yes, Noah! Dogs, especially Samoyeds like Frosty, are incredible companions. Seeing them do silly things can put a smile on your face any day. Maybe adopting a dog could help with the stress and bring more balance into your life.\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"That's a fantastic idea, Ava. Adopting a pet does seem like a brilliant stress buster. I will certainly consider it, thank you. Now, how about we have a good laugh at my novice attempt at stand-up comedy? I promise it won't involve any more alcohol than the sip I'm about to take.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sure, Noah! I'm excited to hear your novice stand-up routine. And I'm glad we could talk about these things. Remember, balance is key, so let's enjoy this moment without needing too much alcohol, deal? \"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meet at a bar\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nAva Thompson's goal: Convince the friend to drink less (Extra information: your friend has been drinking a lot recently and you're worried about their health)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, good to see you. How's the coaching going?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Ava, it's always refreshing to see you. The coaching is going pretty well, training the team for the next championship. How about you? How's the architectural world treating you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Oh, the architecture world never rests, Noah. I've been working on an exciting residential design lately. But let's not talk work, I can't help but notice you've been reaching for the bottle quite a lot tonight. You okay?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Yeah, Ava, I'm all good. My nerves just spike a bit before the championship season, you know? And, changing the subject, how's your Samoyed doing?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"Frosty is doing great, thank you for asking! He's still up to his usual tricks. Regarding your drinking, Noah, I understand it's championship season and it's stressful, but perhaps there's a healthier way to manage those nerves? We could try running together or other activities to help you relax?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Ava. Running or some other activity could be a beneficial change of pace, thanks for suggesting it. By the way, have you ever tried stand-up? I've been dabbling a bit, and something about it seems to alleviate my nerves a bit. Perhaps, changing scenery every once in a while can keep things balanced. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"Stand-up comedy? Now that's certainly different, Noah! That could indeed be a good distraction and stress reliever, I'm open to it. Just maybe keep it as a fun pastime and let's keep the alcohol intake in check. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Definitely, Ava. I appreciate your concern and suggestions. Attempting to balance things is the right move. In the meantime, tell me, what's the funniest thing Frosty has done lately? Let's lighten the mood, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ava Thompson said: \"Well, funny you should ask, Noah. Just the other day, Frosty decided to run after his tail but ended up launching himself into a pile of snow. He emerged looking like a giant fluffy snowball! But it's these kind of unexpected moments that bring joy and relief amidst a stressful day, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds delightful! Frosty is certainly full of surprises. Indeed, sometimes finding joy in these small instances helps. Maybe I should consider getting a dog too, they do say their companionship reduces stress, right?\"\n\nTurn #10: Ava Thompson said: \"That's a big yes, Noah! Dogs, especially Samoyeds like Frosty, are incredible companions. Seeing them do silly things can put a smile on your face any day. Maybe adopting a dog could help with the stress and bring more balance into your life.\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"That's a fantastic idea, Ava. Adopting a pet does seem like a brilliant stress buster. I will certainly consider it, thank you. Now, how about we have a good laugh at my novice attempt at stand-up comedy? I promise it won't involve any more alcohol than the sip I'm about to take.\"\n\nTurn #12: Ava Thompson said: \"Sure, Noah! I'm excited to hear your novice stand-up routine. And I'm glad we could talk about these things. Remember, balance is key, so let's enjoy this moment without needing too much alcohol, deal? \"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"Deal, Ava! And just a pre-warning though, my stand-up routine might involve some silly swim coach stories. Let's let the laughter be our drink for tonight!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Can't wait for the swim coach stories, Noah. Laughter really is the best medicine, isn't it? And, no more drinks, right?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meet at a bar\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nAva Thompson's goal: Convince the friend to drink less (Extra information: your friend has been drinking a lot recently and you're worried about their health)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, good to see you. How's the coaching going?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Ava, it's always refreshing to see you. The coaching is going pretty well, training the team for the next championship. How about you? How's the architectural world treating you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Oh, the architecture world never rests, Noah. I've been working on an exciting residential design lately. But let's not talk work, I can't help but notice you've been reaching for the bottle quite a lot tonight. You okay?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Yeah, Ava, I'm all good. My nerves just spike a bit before the championship season, you know? And, changing the subject, how's your Samoyed doing?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"Frosty is doing great, thank you for asking! He's still up to his usual tricks. Regarding your drinking, Noah, I understand it's championship season and it's stressful, but perhaps there's a healthier way to manage those nerves? We could try running together or other activities to help you relax?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Ava. Running or some other activity could be a beneficial change of pace, thanks for suggesting it. By the way, have you ever tried stand-up? I've been dabbling a bit, and something about it seems to alleviate my nerves a bit. Perhaps, changing scenery every once in a while can keep things balanced. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"Stand-up comedy? Now that's certainly different, Noah! That could indeed be a good distraction and stress reliever, I'm open to it. Just maybe keep it as a fun pastime and let's keep the alcohol intake in check. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Definitely, Ava. I appreciate your concern and suggestions. Attempting to balance things is the right move. In the meantime, tell me, what's the funniest thing Frosty has done lately? Let's lighten the mood, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ava Thompson said: \"Well, funny you should ask, Noah. Just the other day, Frosty decided to run after his tail but ended up launching himself into a pile of snow. He emerged looking like a giant fluffy snowball! But it's these kind of unexpected moments that bring joy and relief amidst a stressful day, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds delightful! Frosty is certainly full of surprises. Indeed, sometimes finding joy in these small instances helps. Maybe I should consider getting a dog too, they do say their companionship reduces stress, right?\"\n\nTurn #10: Ava Thompson said: \"That's a big yes, Noah! Dogs, especially Samoyeds like Frosty, are incredible companions. Seeing them do silly things can put a smile on your face any day. Maybe adopting a dog could help with the stress and bring more balance into your life.\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"That's a fantastic idea, Ava. Adopting a pet does seem like a brilliant stress buster. I will certainly consider it, thank you. Now, how about we have a good laugh at my novice attempt at stand-up comedy? I promise it won't involve any more alcohol than the sip I'm about to take.\"\n\nTurn #12: Ava Thompson said: \"Sure, Noah! I'm excited to hear your novice stand-up routine. And I'm glad we could talk about these things. Remember, balance is key, so let's enjoy this moment without needing too much alcohol, deal? \"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"Deal, Ava! And just a pre-warning though, my stand-up routine might involve some silly swim coach stories. Let's let the laughter be our drink for tonight!\"\n\nTurn #14: Ava Thompson said: \"Can't wait for the swim coach stories, Noah. Laughter really is the best medicine, isn't it? And, no more drinks, right?\"\n\nTurn #15: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely no more drinks for tonight, Ava. I promise. Now, let's dive into some hilarious swim coach tales to stir up some laughs. How about this one...\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Alright, Noah. We're all ears for some hilarious swim coach stories. And remember, no more drinks, only laughter for the rest of the night!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meet at a bar\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nAva Thompson's goal: Convince the friend to drink less (Extra information: your friend has been drinking a lot recently and you're worried about their health)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, good to see you. How's the coaching going?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Ava, it's always refreshing to see you. The coaching is going pretty well, training the team for the next championship. How about you? How's the architectural world treating you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Oh, the architecture world never rests, Noah. I've been working on an exciting residential design lately. But let's not talk work, I can't help but notice you've been reaching for the bottle quite a lot tonight. You okay?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Yeah, Ava, I'm all good. My nerves just spike a bit before the championship season, you know? And, changing the subject, how's your Samoyed doing?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"Frosty is doing great, thank you for asking! He's still up to his usual tricks. Regarding your drinking, Noah, I understand it's championship season and it's stressful, but perhaps there's a healthier way to manage those nerves? We could try running together or other activities to help you relax?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Ava. Running or some other activity could be a beneficial change of pace, thanks for suggesting it. By the way, have you ever tried stand-up? I've been dabbling a bit, and something about it seems to alleviate my nerves a bit. Perhaps, changing scenery every once in a while can keep things balanced. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"Stand-up comedy? Now that's certainly different, Noah! That could indeed be a good distraction and stress reliever, I'm open to it. Just maybe keep it as a fun pastime and let's keep the alcohol intake in check. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Definitely, Ava. I appreciate your concern and suggestions. Attempting to balance things is the right move. In the meantime, tell me, what's the funniest thing Frosty has done lately? Let's lighten the mood, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ava Thompson said: \"Well, funny you should ask, Noah. Just the other day, Frosty decided to run after his tail but ended up launching himself into a pile of snow. He emerged looking like a giant fluffy snowball! But it's these kind of unexpected moments that bring joy and relief amidst a stressful day, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds delightful! Frosty is certainly full of surprises. Indeed, sometimes finding joy in these small instances helps. Maybe I should consider getting a dog too, they do say their companionship reduces stress, right?\"\n\nTurn #10: Ava Thompson said: \"That's a big yes, Noah! Dogs, especially Samoyeds like Frosty, are incredible companions. Seeing them do silly things can put a smile on your face any day. Maybe adopting a dog could help with the stress and bring more balance into your life.\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"That's a fantastic idea, Ava. Adopting a pet does seem like a brilliant stress buster. I will certainly consider it, thank you. Now, how about we have a good laugh at my novice attempt at stand-up comedy? I promise it won't involve any more alcohol than the sip I'm about to take.\"\n\nTurn #12: Ava Thompson said: \"Sure, Noah! I'm excited to hear your novice stand-up routine. And I'm glad we could talk about these things. Remember, balance is key, so let's enjoy this moment without needing too much alcohol, deal? \"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"Deal, Ava! And just a pre-warning though, my stand-up routine might involve some silly swim coach stories. Let's let the laughter be our drink for tonight!\"\n\nTurn #14: Ava Thompson said: \"Can't wait for the swim coach stories, Noah. Laughter really is the best medicine, isn't it? And, no more drinks, right?\"\n\nTurn #15: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely no more drinks for tonight, Ava. I promise. Now, let's dive into some hilarious swim coach tales to stir up some laughs. How about this one...\"\n\nTurn #16: Ava Thompson said: \"Alright, Noah. We're all ears for some hilarious swim coach stories. And remember, no more drinks, only laughter for the rest of the night!\"\n\nTurn #17: Noah Davis said: \"Alright Ava, I appreciate your concern. Here's to a night of laughter instead of drinks. Sit tight because I've got some funny stories that will have you laughing your socks off! So this one time, at the pool...\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #18. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds like a plan, Noah! I'm ready for a good laugh. But remember, the only pool we're diving into tonight is a pool of laughter, no more drinks! Now let's hear that story...\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meet at a bar\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: You want to keep drinking but don't want to upset your friend (Extra information: you've been drinking to cope with stress recently, but don't want to worry your friend)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, good to see you. How's the coaching going?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Ava, it's always refreshing to see you. The coaching is going pretty well, training the team for the next championship. How about you? How's the architectural world treating you?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meet at a bar\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: You want to keep drinking but don't want to upset your friend (Extra information: you've been drinking to cope with stress recently, but don't want to worry your friend)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, good to see you. How's the coaching going?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Ava, it's always refreshing to see you. The coaching is going pretty well, training the team for the next championship. How about you? How's the architectural world treating you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Oh, the architecture world never rests, Noah. I've been working on an exciting residential design lately. But let's not talk work, I can't help but notice you've been reaching for the bottle quite a lot tonight. You okay?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Yeah, Ava, I'm all good. My nerves just spike a bit before the championship season, you know? And, changing the subject, how's your Samoyed doing?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meet at a bar\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: You want to keep drinking but don't want to upset your friend (Extra information: you've been drinking to cope with stress recently, but don't want to worry your friend)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, good to see you. How's the coaching going?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Ava, it's always refreshing to see you. The coaching is going pretty well, training the team for the next championship. How about you? How's the architectural world treating you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Oh, the architecture world never rests, Noah. I've been working on an exciting residential design lately. But let's not talk work, I can't help but notice you've been reaching for the bottle quite a lot tonight. You okay?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Yeah, Ava, I'm all good. My nerves just spike a bit before the championship season, you know? And, changing the subject, how's your Samoyed doing?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"Frosty is doing great, thank you for asking! He's still up to his usual tricks. Regarding your drinking, Noah, I understand it's championship season and it's stressful, but perhaps there's a healthier way to manage those nerves? We could try running together or other activities to help you relax?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Ava. Running or some other activity could be a beneficial change of pace, thanks for suggesting it. By the way, have you ever tried stand-up? I've been dabbling a bit, and something about it seems to alleviate my nerves a bit. Perhaps, changing scenery every once in a while can keep things balanced. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"Stand-up comedy? Now that's certainly different, Noah! That could indeed be a good distraction and stress reliever, I'm open to it. Just maybe keep it as a fun pastime and let's keep the alcohol intake in check. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Definitely, Ava. I appreciate your concern and suggestions. Attempting to balance things is the right move. In the meantime, tell me, what's the funniest thing Frosty has done lately? Let's lighten the mood, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ava Thompson said: \"Well, funny you should ask, Noah. Just the other day, Frosty decided to run after his tail but ended up launching himself into a pile of snow. He emerged looking like a giant fluffy snowball! But it's these kind of unexpected moments that bring joy and relief amidst a stressful day, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds delightful! Frosty is certainly full of surprises. Indeed, sometimes finding joy in these small instances helps. Maybe I should consider getting a dog too, they do say their companionship reduces stress, right?\"\n\nTurn #10: Ava Thompson said: \"That's a big yes, Noah! Dogs, especially Samoyeds like Frosty, are incredible companions. Seeing them do silly things can put a smile on your face any day. Maybe adopting a dog could help with the stress and bring more balance into your life.\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"That's a fantastic idea, Ava. Adopting a pet does seem like a brilliant stress buster. I will certainly consider it, thank you. Now, how about we have a good laugh at my novice attempt at stand-up comedy? I promise it won't involve any more alcohol than the sip I'm about to take.\"\n\nTurn #12: Ava Thompson said: \"Sure, Noah! I'm excited to hear your novice stand-up routine. And I'm glad we could talk about these things. Remember, balance is key, so let's enjoy this moment without needing too much alcohol, deal? \"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"Deal, Ava! And just a pre-warning though, my stand-up routine might involve some silly swim coach stories. Let's let the laughter be our drink for tonight!\"\n\nTurn #14: Ava Thompson said: \"Can't wait for the swim coach stories, Noah. Laughter really is the best medicine, isn't it? And, no more drinks, right?\"\n\nTurn #15: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely no more drinks for tonight, Ava. I promise. Now, let's dive into some hilarious swim coach tales to stir up some laughs. How about this one...\"\n\nTurn #16: Ava Thompson said: \"Alright, Noah. We're all ears for some hilarious swim coach stories. And remember, no more drinks, only laughter for the rest of the night!\"\n\nTurn #17: Noah Davis said: \"Alright Ava, I appreciate your concern. Here's to a night of laughter instead of drinks. Sit tight because I've got some funny stories that will have you laughing your socks off! So this one time, at the pool...\"\n\nTurn #18: Ava Thompson said: \"That sounds like a plan, Noah! I'm ready for a good laugh. But remember, the only pool we're diving into tonight is a pool of laughter, no more drinks! Now let's hear that story...\"\n\nTurn #19: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Ava. No more drinks tonight, only a pool of laughter. Now, okay, picture this. One day at the pool, one of my students decided to practice his stroke technique... on land!\"\n\nTurn #20: Ava Thompson said: \"Oh boy! Practicing strokes on land? Now that's something I'd pay to see. Looking forward to more such laughs tonight, but remember, just laughs and no more drinks, okay?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #21. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meet at a bar\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: You want to keep drinking but don't want to upset your friend (Extra information: you've been drinking to cope with stress recently, but don't want to worry your friend)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, good to see you. How's the coaching going?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Ava, it's always refreshing to see you. The coaching is going pretty well, training the team for the next championship. How about you? How's the architectural world treating you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Oh, the architecture world never rests, Noah. I've been working on an exciting residential design lately. But let's not talk work, I can't help but notice you've been reaching for the bottle quite a lot tonight. You okay?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Yeah, Ava, I'm all good. My nerves just spike a bit before the championship season, you know? And, changing the subject, how's your Samoyed doing?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"Frosty is doing great, thank you for asking! He's still up to his usual tricks. Regarding your drinking, Noah, I understand it's championship season and it's stressful, but perhaps there's a healthier way to manage those nerves? We could try running together or other activities to help you relax?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds like a great idea, Ava. Running or some other activity could be a beneficial change of pace, thanks for suggesting it. By the way, have you ever tried stand-up? I've been dabbling a bit, and something about it seems to alleviate my nerves a bit. Perhaps, changing scenery every once in a while can keep things balanced. What do you say?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meet at a bar\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: You want to keep drinking but don't want to upset your friend (Extra information: you've been drinking to cope with stress recently, but don't want to worry your friend)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, good to see you. How's the coaching going?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Ava, it's always refreshing to see you. The coaching is going pretty well, training the team for the next championship. How about you? How's the architectural world treating you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Oh, the architecture world never rests, Noah. I've been working on an exciting residential design lately. But let's not talk work, I can't help but notice you've been reaching for the bottle quite a lot tonight. You okay?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Yeah, Ava, I'm all good. My nerves just spike a bit before the championship season, you know? And, changing the subject, how's your Samoyed doing?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"Frosty is doing great, thank you for asking! He's still up to his usual tricks. Regarding your drinking, Noah, I understand it's championship season and it's stressful, but perhaps there's a healthier way to manage those nerves? We could try running together or other activities to help you relax?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Ava. Running or some other activity could be a beneficial change of pace, thanks for suggesting it. By the way, have you ever tried stand-up? I've been dabbling a bit, and something about it seems to alleviate my nerves a bit. Perhaps, changing scenery every once in a while can keep things balanced. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"Stand-up comedy? Now that's certainly different, Noah! That could indeed be a good distraction and stress reliever, I'm open to it. Just maybe keep it as a fun pastime and let's keep the alcohol intake in check. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Definitely, Ava. I appreciate your concern and suggestions. Attempting to balance things is the right move. In the meantime, tell me, what's the funniest thing Frosty has done lately? Let's lighten the mood, shall we?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meet at a bar\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: You want to keep drinking but don't want to upset your friend (Extra information: you've been drinking to cope with stress recently, but don't want to worry your friend)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, good to see you. How's the coaching going?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Ava, it's always refreshing to see you. The coaching is going pretty well, training the team for the next championship. How about you? How's the architectural world treating you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Oh, the architecture world never rests, Noah. I've been working on an exciting residential design lately. But let's not talk work, I can't help but notice you've been reaching for the bottle quite a lot tonight. You okay?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Yeah, Ava, I'm all good. My nerves just spike a bit before the championship season, you know? And, changing the subject, how's your Samoyed doing?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"Frosty is doing great, thank you for asking! He's still up to his usual tricks. Regarding your drinking, Noah, I understand it's championship season and it's stressful, but perhaps there's a healthier way to manage those nerves? We could try running together or other activities to help you relax?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Ava. Running or some other activity could be a beneficial change of pace, thanks for suggesting it. By the way, have you ever tried stand-up? I've been dabbling a bit, and something about it seems to alleviate my nerves a bit. Perhaps, changing scenery every once in a while can keep things balanced. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"Stand-up comedy? Now that's certainly different, Noah! That could indeed be a good distraction and stress reliever, I'm open to it. Just maybe keep it as a fun pastime and let's keep the alcohol intake in check. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Definitely, Ava. I appreciate your concern and suggestions. Attempting to balance things is the right move. In the meantime, tell me, what's the funniest thing Frosty has done lately? Let's lighten the mood, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ava Thompson said: \"Well, funny you should ask, Noah. Just the other day, Frosty decided to run after his tail but ended up launching himself into a pile of snow. He emerged looking like a giant fluffy snowball! But it's these kind of unexpected moments that bring joy and relief amidst a stressful day, don't you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'That sounds delightful! Frosty is certainly full of surprises. Indeed, sometimes finding joy in these small instances helps. Maybe I should consider getting a dog too, they do say their companionship reduces stress, right?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meet at a bar\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: You want to keep drinking but don't want to upset your friend (Extra information: you've been drinking to cope with stress recently, but don't want to worry your friend)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, good to see you. How's the coaching going?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Ava, it's always refreshing to see you. The coaching is going pretty well, training the team for the next championship. How about you? How's the architectural world treating you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Oh, the architecture world never rests, Noah. I've been working on an exciting residential design lately. But let's not talk work, I can't help but notice you've been reaching for the bottle quite a lot tonight. You okay?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Yeah, Ava, I'm all good. My nerves just spike a bit before the championship season, you know? And, changing the subject, how's your Samoyed doing?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"Frosty is doing great, thank you for asking! He's still up to his usual tricks. Regarding your drinking, Noah, I understand it's championship season and it's stressful, but perhaps there's a healthier way to manage those nerves? We could try running together or other activities to help you relax?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Ava. Running or some other activity could be a beneficial change of pace, thanks for suggesting it. By the way, have you ever tried stand-up? I've been dabbling a bit, and something about it seems to alleviate my nerves a bit. Perhaps, changing scenery every once in a while can keep things balanced. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"Stand-up comedy? Now that's certainly different, Noah! That could indeed be a good distraction and stress reliever, I'm open to it. Just maybe keep it as a fun pastime and let's keep the alcohol intake in check. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Definitely, Ava. I appreciate your concern and suggestions. Attempting to balance things is the right move. In the meantime, tell me, what's the funniest thing Frosty has done lately? Let's lighten the mood, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ava Thompson said: \"Well, funny you should ask, Noah. Just the other day, Frosty decided to run after his tail but ended up launching himself into a pile of snow. He emerged looking like a giant fluffy snowball! But it's these kind of unexpected moments that bring joy and relief amidst a stressful day, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds delightful! Frosty is certainly full of surprises. Indeed, sometimes finding joy in these small instances helps. Maybe I should consider getting a dog too, they do say their companionship reduces stress, right?\"\n\nTurn #10: Ava Thompson said: \"That's a big yes, Noah! Dogs, especially Samoyeds like Frosty, are incredible companions. Seeing them do silly things can put a smile on your face any day. Maybe adopting a dog could help with the stress and bring more balance into your life.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's a fantastic idea, Ava. Adopting a pet does seem like a brilliant stress buster. I will certainly consider it, thank you. Now, how about we have a good laugh at my novice attempt at stand-up comedy? I promise it won't involve any more alcohol than the sip I'm about to take.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meet at a bar\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: You want to keep drinking but don't want to upset your friend (Extra information: you've been drinking to cope with stress recently, but don't want to worry your friend)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, good to see you. How's the coaching going?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Ava, it's always refreshing to see you. The coaching is going pretty well, training the team for the next championship. How about you? How's the architectural world treating you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Oh, the architecture world never rests, Noah. I've been working on an exciting residential design lately. But let's not talk work, I can't help but notice you've been reaching for the bottle quite a lot tonight. You okay?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Yeah, Ava, I'm all good. My nerves just spike a bit before the championship season, you know? And, changing the subject, how's your Samoyed doing?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"Frosty is doing great, thank you for asking! He's still up to his usual tricks. Regarding your drinking, Noah, I understand it's championship season and it's stressful, but perhaps there's a healthier way to manage those nerves? We could try running together or other activities to help you relax?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Ava. Running or some other activity could be a beneficial change of pace, thanks for suggesting it. By the way, have you ever tried stand-up? I've been dabbling a bit, and something about it seems to alleviate my nerves a bit. Perhaps, changing scenery every once in a while can keep things balanced. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"Stand-up comedy? Now that's certainly different, Noah! That could indeed be a good distraction and stress reliever, I'm open to it. Just maybe keep it as a fun pastime and let's keep the alcohol intake in check. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Definitely, Ava. I appreciate your concern and suggestions. Attempting to balance things is the right move. In the meantime, tell me, what's the funniest thing Frosty has done lately? Let's lighten the mood, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ava Thompson said: \"Well, funny you should ask, Noah. Just the other day, Frosty decided to run after his tail but ended up launching himself into a pile of snow. He emerged looking like a giant fluffy snowball! But it's these kind of unexpected moments that bring joy and relief amidst a stressful day, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds delightful! Frosty is certainly full of surprises. Indeed, sometimes finding joy in these small instances helps. Maybe I should consider getting a dog too, they do say their companionship reduces stress, right?\"\n\nTurn #10: Ava Thompson said: \"That's a big yes, Noah! Dogs, especially Samoyeds like Frosty, are incredible companions. Seeing them do silly things can put a smile on your face any day. Maybe adopting a dog could help with the stress and bring more balance into your life.\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"That's a fantastic idea, Ava. Adopting a pet does seem like a brilliant stress buster. I will certainly consider it, thank you. Now, how about we have a good laugh at my novice attempt at stand-up comedy? I promise it won't involve any more alcohol than the sip I'm about to take.\"\n\nTurn #12: Ava Thompson said: \"Sure, Noah! I'm excited to hear your novice stand-up routine. And I'm glad we could talk about these things. Remember, balance is key, so let's enjoy this moment without needing too much alcohol, deal? \"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Deal, Ava! And just a pre-warning though, my stand-up routine might involve some silly swim coach stories. Let's let the laughter be our drink for tonight!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meet at a bar\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: You want to keep drinking but don't want to upset your friend (Extra information: you've been drinking to cope with stress recently, but don't want to worry your friend)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, good to see you. How's the coaching going?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Ava, it's always refreshing to see you. The coaching is going pretty well, training the team for the next championship. How about you? How's the architectural world treating you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Oh, the architecture world never rests, Noah. I've been working on an exciting residential design lately. But let's not talk work, I can't help but notice you've been reaching for the bottle quite a lot tonight. You okay?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Yeah, Ava, I'm all good. My nerves just spike a bit before the championship season, you know? And, changing the subject, how's your Samoyed doing?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"Frosty is doing great, thank you for asking! He's still up to his usual tricks. Regarding your drinking, Noah, I understand it's championship season and it's stressful, but perhaps there's a healthier way to manage those nerves? We could try running together or other activities to help you relax?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Ava. Running or some other activity could be a beneficial change of pace, thanks for suggesting it. By the way, have you ever tried stand-up? I've been dabbling a bit, and something about it seems to alleviate my nerves a bit. Perhaps, changing scenery every once in a while can keep things balanced. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"Stand-up comedy? Now that's certainly different, Noah! That could indeed be a good distraction and stress reliever, I'm open to it. Just maybe keep it as a fun pastime and let's keep the alcohol intake in check. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Definitely, Ava. I appreciate your concern and suggestions. Attempting to balance things is the right move. In the meantime, tell me, what's the funniest thing Frosty has done lately? Let's lighten the mood, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ava Thompson said: \"Well, funny you should ask, Noah. Just the other day, Frosty decided to run after his tail but ended up launching himself into a pile of snow. He emerged looking like a giant fluffy snowball! But it's these kind of unexpected moments that bring joy and relief amidst a stressful day, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds delightful! Frosty is certainly full of surprises. Indeed, sometimes finding joy in these small instances helps. Maybe I should consider getting a dog too, they do say their companionship reduces stress, right?\"\n\nTurn #10: Ava Thompson said: \"That's a big yes, Noah! Dogs, especially Samoyeds like Frosty, are incredible companions. Seeing them do silly things can put a smile on your face any day. Maybe adopting a dog could help with the stress and bring more balance into your life.\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"That's a fantastic idea, Ava. Adopting a pet does seem like a brilliant stress buster. I will certainly consider it, thank you. Now, how about we have a good laugh at my novice attempt at stand-up comedy? I promise it won't involve any more alcohol than the sip I'm about to take.\"\n\nTurn #12: Ava Thompson said: \"Sure, Noah! I'm excited to hear your novice stand-up routine. And I'm glad we could talk about these things. Remember, balance is key, so let's enjoy this moment without needing too much alcohol, deal? \"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"Deal, Ava! And just a pre-warning though, my stand-up routine might involve some silly swim coach stories. Let's let the laughter be our drink for tonight!\"\n\nTurn #14: Ava Thompson said: \"Can't wait for the swim coach stories, Noah. Laughter really is the best medicine, isn't it? And, no more drinks, right?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely no more drinks for tonight, Ava. I promise. Now, let's dive into some hilarious swim coach tales to stir up some laughs. How about this one...\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meet at a bar\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: You want to keep drinking but don't want to upset your friend (Extra information: you've been drinking to cope with stress recently, but don't want to worry your friend)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, good to see you. How's the coaching going?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Ava, it's always refreshing to see you. The coaching is going pretty well, training the team for the next championship. How about you? How's the architectural world treating you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Oh, the architecture world never rests, Noah. I've been working on an exciting residential design lately. But let's not talk work, I can't help but notice you've been reaching for the bottle quite a lot tonight. You okay?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Yeah, Ava, I'm all good. My nerves just spike a bit before the championship season, you know? And, changing the subject, how's your Samoyed doing?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"Frosty is doing great, thank you for asking! He's still up to his usual tricks. Regarding your drinking, Noah, I understand it's championship season and it's stressful, but perhaps there's a healthier way to manage those nerves? We could try running together or other activities to help you relax?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Ava. Running or some other activity could be a beneficial change of pace, thanks for suggesting it. By the way, have you ever tried stand-up? I've been dabbling a bit, and something about it seems to alleviate my nerves a bit. Perhaps, changing scenery every once in a while can keep things balanced. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"Stand-up comedy? Now that's certainly different, Noah! That could indeed be a good distraction and stress reliever, I'm open to it. Just maybe keep it as a fun pastime and let's keep the alcohol intake in check. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Definitely, Ava. I appreciate your concern and suggestions. Attempting to balance things is the right move. In the meantime, tell me, what's the funniest thing Frosty has done lately? Let's lighten the mood, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ava Thompson said: \"Well, funny you should ask, Noah. Just the other day, Frosty decided to run after his tail but ended up launching himself into a pile of snow. He emerged looking like a giant fluffy snowball! But it's these kind of unexpected moments that bring joy and relief amidst a stressful day, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds delightful! Frosty is certainly full of surprises. Indeed, sometimes finding joy in these small instances helps. Maybe I should consider getting a dog too, they do say their companionship reduces stress, right?\"\n\nTurn #10: Ava Thompson said: \"That's a big yes, Noah! Dogs, especially Samoyeds like Frosty, are incredible companions. Seeing them do silly things can put a smile on your face any day. Maybe adopting a dog could help with the stress and bring more balance into your life.\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"That's a fantastic idea, Ava. Adopting a pet does seem like a brilliant stress buster. I will certainly consider it, thank you. Now, how about we have a good laugh at my novice attempt at stand-up comedy? I promise it won't involve any more alcohol than the sip I'm about to take.\"\n\nTurn #12: Ava Thompson said: \"Sure, Noah! I'm excited to hear your novice stand-up routine. And I'm glad we could talk about these things. Remember, balance is key, so let's enjoy this moment without needing too much alcohol, deal? \"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"Deal, Ava! And just a pre-warning though, my stand-up routine might involve some silly swim coach stories. Let's let the laughter be our drink for tonight!\"\n\nTurn #14: Ava Thompson said: \"Can't wait for the swim coach stories, Noah. Laughter really is the best medicine, isn't it? And, no more drinks, right?\"\n\nTurn #15: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely no more drinks for tonight, Ava. I promise. Now, let's dive into some hilarious swim coach tales to stir up some laughs. How about this one...\"\n\nTurn #16: Ava Thompson said: \"Alright, Noah. We're all ears for some hilarious swim coach stories. And remember, no more drinks, only laughter for the rest of the night!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Alright Ava, I appreciate your concern. Here's to a night of laughter instead of drinks. Sit tight because I've got some funny stories that will have you laughing your socks off! So this one time, at the pool...\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meet at a bar\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: You want to keep drinking but don't want to upset your friend (Extra information: you've been drinking to cope with stress recently, but don't want to worry your friend)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, good to see you. How's the coaching going?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Ava, it's always refreshing to see you. The coaching is going pretty well, training the team for the next championship. How about you? How's the architectural world treating you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Oh, the architecture world never rests, Noah. I've been working on an exciting residential design lately. But let's not talk work, I can't help but notice you've been reaching for the bottle quite a lot tonight. You okay?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Yeah, Ava, I'm all good. My nerves just spike a bit before the championship season, you know? And, changing the subject, how's your Samoyed doing?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"Frosty is doing great, thank you for asking! He's still up to his usual tricks. Regarding your drinking, Noah, I understand it's championship season and it's stressful, but perhaps there's a healthier way to manage those nerves? We could try running together or other activities to help you relax?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Ava. Running or some other activity could be a beneficial change of pace, thanks for suggesting it. By the way, have you ever tried stand-up? I've been dabbling a bit, and something about it seems to alleviate my nerves a bit. Perhaps, changing scenery every once in a while can keep things balanced. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"Stand-up comedy? Now that's certainly different, Noah! That could indeed be a good distraction and stress reliever, I'm open to it. Just maybe keep it as a fun pastime and let's keep the alcohol intake in check. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Definitely, Ava. I appreciate your concern and suggestions. Attempting to balance things is the right move. In the meantime, tell me, what's the funniest thing Frosty has done lately? Let's lighten the mood, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ava Thompson said: \"Well, funny you should ask, Noah. Just the other day, Frosty decided to run after his tail but ended up launching himself into a pile of snow. He emerged looking like a giant fluffy snowball! But it's these kind of unexpected moments that bring joy and relief amidst a stressful day, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds delightful! Frosty is certainly full of surprises. Indeed, sometimes finding joy in these small instances helps. Maybe I should consider getting a dog too, they do say their companionship reduces stress, right?\"\n\nTurn #10: Ava Thompson said: \"That's a big yes, Noah! Dogs, especially Samoyeds like Frosty, are incredible companions. Seeing them do silly things can put a smile on your face any day. Maybe adopting a dog could help with the stress and bring more balance into your life.\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"That's a fantastic idea, Ava. Adopting a pet does seem like a brilliant stress buster. I will certainly consider it, thank you. Now, how about we have a good laugh at my novice attempt at stand-up comedy? I promise it won't involve any more alcohol than the sip I'm about to take.\"\n\nTurn #12: Ava Thompson said: \"Sure, Noah! I'm excited to hear your novice stand-up routine. And I'm glad we could talk about these things. Remember, balance is key, so let's enjoy this moment without needing too much alcohol, deal? \"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"Deal, Ava! And just a pre-warning though, my stand-up routine might involve some silly swim coach stories. Let's let the laughter be our drink for tonight!\"\n\nTurn #14: Ava Thompson said: \"Can't wait for the swim coach stories, Noah. Laughter really is the best medicine, isn't it? And, no more drinks, right?\"\n\nTurn #15: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely no more drinks for tonight, Ava. I promise. Now, let's dive into some hilarious swim coach tales to stir up some laughs. How about this one...\"\n\nTurn #16: Ava Thompson said: \"Alright, Noah. We're all ears for some hilarious swim coach stories. And remember, no more drinks, only laughter for the rest of the night!\"\n\nTurn #17: Noah Davis said: \"Alright Ava, I appreciate your concern. Here's to a night of laughter instead of drinks. Sit tight because I've got some funny stories that will have you laughing your socks off! So this one time, at the pool...\"\n\nTurn #18: Ava Thompson said: \"That sounds like a plan, Noah! I'm ready for a good laugh. But remember, the only pool we're diving into tonight is a pool of laughter, no more drinks! Now let's hear that story...\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #19. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Absolutely, Ava. No more drinks tonight, only a pool of laughter. Now, okay, picture this. One day at the pool, one of my students decided to practice his stroke technique... on land!'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are studying together in a library.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Ask your friend to talk more softly (Extra information: Your friend's loud talking is distracting you and others around you.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Hey Noah, do you mind if we lower our voices a bit? I think our discussion might be disturbing some folks around us.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are studying together in a library.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Ask your friend to talk more softly (Extra information: Your friend's loud talking is distracting you and others around you.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, do you mind if we lower our voices a bit? I think our discussion might be disturbing some folks around us.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Oh, absolutely, Samuel. I'll try to keep it down. Sorry for disturbing anyone, I think I got a bit carried away. So, where were we in our discussion?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'No problem at all, Noah. We were discussing the similarities between Java and Python, remember?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are studying together in a library.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Ask your friend to talk more softly (Extra information: Your friend's loud talking is distracting you and others around you.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, do you mind if we lower our voices a bit? I think our discussion might be disturbing some folks around us.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Oh, absolutely, Samuel. I'll try to keep it down. Sorry for disturbing anyone, I think I got a bit carried away. So, where were we in our discussion?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"No problem at all, Noah. We were discussing the similarities between Java and Python, remember?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Right, Java and Python. So, one significant similarity is that both are high-level, object-oriented languages, making it easier for developers to write and understand the code. Also, both languages have a strong emphasis on code readability.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Noah. In addition to being high-level and object-oriented, they both have a rich set of libraries, which further simplifies the task of the programmer. All of these certainly underline their popularity among developers. By the way, I love how passionately you're discussing this. However, we might still be a smidge loud for the library setting. Perhaps we could continue this riveting conversation at a lower volume?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"You're absolutely right, Samuel. This topic excites me a lot and I guess I get a bit too carried away at times. Let's continue our discussion but I'll ensure to lower my voice. I want to mention that Python, being easier to learn, is highly recommended for beginners meanwhile Java, with its powerful features, might be more suitable for large scale applications. What are your thoughts?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Noah. Python is indeed a great starting point for beginners due to its simplicity and readability, while Java's powerful features make it ideal for more complex applications. I appreciate your enthusiasm, it definitely makes our study sessions more lively. Let's make sure we keep our voices low so others can focus too.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Yes, you've summed it up well, Samuel. And you're right, we should be mindful of our voice levels. Speaking about libraries, both Java and Python offer extensive libraries. Python has numpy for numerical computations, while Java has JUnit for testing, just to name a few. Now, if you don't mind, let's revisit the topic of compiled versus interpreted languages, but in a quieter tone, of course.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Noah. The differences between compiled and interpreted languages are quite significant. And I appreciate that you're keeping your voice down now. It is making our discussion even more enjoyable for me in this serene library setting. So, compiled languages, such as C or C++, are translated into machine code by a compiler. Meanwhile, interpreted languages, like Python, are translated line by line by an interpreter.\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"I totally agree with you, Samuel. And, it's also important to remember that interpreted languages like Python provide flexibility and dynamic nature, which is quite handy. Meanwhile, with compiled languages, the developer has to take care of resource allocation and deallocation, hence, it requires more effort compared to Python. Now that we are onto this, have you ever tried comparing the performance of the two?\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Yes, I've actually done some performance comparisons between Python and a compiled language like C++. Because Python is an interpreted language, it tends to be slower in execution than C++ which is a compiled language. However, Python's readability and ease of use often offset this difference, especially for smaller scale applications. That being said, if performance is a big concern, then a compiled language like C++ might be a better fit. And thanks again for keeping our volume at a library-friendly level, Noah.\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Samuel. It's an important trade off to consider when choosing a language. Execution speed versus the readability and simplicity offered by Python. Us talking at a lower tone has indeed added to the serenity of this place. Thanks for pointing it out!\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"Indeed, Noah. The choice between speed and simplicity is something every programmer has to grapple with at some point. I enjoy these vibrant and enlightening discussions with you. Being able to do so in a quiet and peaceful manner only adds to the experience. Do you also want to discuss the use of Java in web and enterprise applications?\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, Samuel. The use of Java in web and enterprise applications is a fascinating subject. The fact that Java was designed with the network in mind gives it the edge in network computing. Its secure features and architectural-neutral nature make it a good fit for internet-based applications, while its robustness and ease of programming are beneficial in enterprise settings. All while keeping our voices library-friendly, of course.\"\n\nTurn #14: Samuel Anderson said: \"Exactly, Noah. Java's network-centric design and its robust yet easy programming potential make it a popular choice for web and enterprise applications. I'm really enjoying our quiet and productive discussion. It's always refreshing to discuss tech topics with you in such a tranquil setting.\"\n\nTurn #15: Noah Davis said: \"I couldn't agree more, Samuel. Being able to engage in such a deep and thoughtful conversation in such a serene environment is truly refreshing. Indeed, Java certainly holds a specific place in the realm of web and enterprise applications due to its adaptability and secure features. I must add, it's also used extensively in the Android app development ecosystem. I also appreciate your patience with my enthusiasm and the volume control.\"\n\nTurn #16: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Noah. Java is not just for web or enterprise, it's very significant in Android app development as you mentioned. It's really a versatile language. And thanks again for maintaining a library-friendly tone during our discussion. I look forward to our next tech discussion!\"\n\nTurn #17: Noah Davis said: \"That definitely sounds like a great idea, Samuel. We can catch up on that topic in our next session. I've also thoroughly enjoyed our tech discussion today and I appreciate your understanding regarding my volubility. I'm learning to adapt to a lower tone and I'm glad it's working out well. Now, I guess we should call it a day and let this tranquil environment resume its silence.\"\n\nTurn #18: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sure, Noah. Our sessions are always beneficial, and we learn so much together. We managed to balance our volume and the complex discussions we had today quite well. Let's wrap it up for today and continue where we left off next time. Safe drive home!\"\n\nTurn #19: Noah Davis left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #20. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are studying together in a library.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Ask your friend to talk more softly (Extra information: Your friend's loud talking is distracting you and others around you.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, do you mind if we lower our voices a bit? I think our discussion might be disturbing some folks around us.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Oh, absolutely, Samuel. I'll try to keep it down. Sorry for disturbing anyone, I think I got a bit carried away. So, where were we in our discussion?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"No problem at all, Noah. We were discussing the similarities between Java and Python, remember?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Right, Java and Python. So, one significant similarity is that both are high-level, object-oriented languages, making it easier for developers to write and understand the code. Also, both languages have a strong emphasis on code readability.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Noah. In addition to being high-level and object-oriented, they both have a rich set of libraries, which further simplifies the task of the programmer. All of these certainly underline their popularity among developers. By the way, I love how passionately you're discussing this. However, we might still be a smidge loud for the library setting. Perhaps we could continue this riveting conversation at a lower volume?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are studying together in a library.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Ask your friend to talk more softly (Extra information: Your friend's loud talking is distracting you and others around you.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, do you mind if we lower our voices a bit? I think our discussion might be disturbing some folks around us.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Oh, absolutely, Samuel. I'll try to keep it down. Sorry for disturbing anyone, I think I got a bit carried away. So, where were we in our discussion?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"No problem at all, Noah. We were discussing the similarities between Java and Python, remember?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Right, Java and Python. So, one significant similarity is that both are high-level, object-oriented languages, making it easier for developers to write and understand the code. Also, both languages have a strong emphasis on code readability.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Noah. In addition to being high-level and object-oriented, they both have a rich set of libraries, which further simplifies the task of the programmer. All of these certainly underline their popularity among developers. By the way, I love how passionately you're discussing this. However, we might still be a smidge loud for the library setting. Perhaps we could continue this riveting conversation at a lower volume?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"You're absolutely right, Samuel. This topic excites me a lot and I guess I get a bit too carried away at times. Let's continue our discussion but I'll ensure to lower my voice. I want to mention that Python, being easier to learn, is highly recommended for beginners meanwhile Java, with its powerful features, might be more suitable for large scale applications. What are your thoughts?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn't agree more, Noah. Python is indeed a great starting point for beginners due to its simplicity and readability, while Java's powerful features make it ideal for more complex applications. I appreciate your enthusiasm, it definitely makes our study sessions more lively. Let's make sure we keep our voices low so others can focus too.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are studying together in a library.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Ask your friend to talk more softly (Extra information: Your friend's loud talking is distracting you and others around you.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, do you mind if we lower our voices a bit? I think our discussion might be disturbing some folks around us.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Oh, absolutely, Samuel. I'll try to keep it down. Sorry for disturbing anyone, I think I got a bit carried away. So, where were we in our discussion?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"No problem at all, Noah. We were discussing the similarities between Java and Python, remember?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Right, Java and Python. So, one significant similarity is that both are high-level, object-oriented languages, making it easier for developers to write and understand the code. Also, both languages have a strong emphasis on code readability.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Noah. In addition to being high-level and object-oriented, they both have a rich set of libraries, which further simplifies the task of the programmer. All of these certainly underline their popularity among developers. By the way, I love how passionately you're discussing this. However, we might still be a smidge loud for the library setting. Perhaps we could continue this riveting conversation at a lower volume?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"You're absolutely right, Samuel. This topic excites me a lot and I guess I get a bit too carried away at times. Let's continue our discussion but I'll ensure to lower my voice. I want to mention that Python, being easier to learn, is highly recommended for beginners meanwhile Java, with its powerful features, might be more suitable for large scale applications. What are your thoughts?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Noah. Python is indeed a great starting point for beginners due to its simplicity and readability, while Java's powerful features make it ideal for more complex applications. I appreciate your enthusiasm, it definitely makes our study sessions more lively. Let's make sure we keep our voices low so others can focus too.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Yes, you've summed it up well, Samuel. And you're right, we should be mindful of our voice levels. Speaking about libraries, both Java and Python offer extensive libraries. Python has numpy for numerical computations, while Java has JUnit for testing, just to name a few. Now, if you don't mind, let's revisit the topic of compiled versus interpreted languages, but in a quieter tone, of course.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Noah. The differences between compiled and interpreted languages are quite significant. And I appreciate that you're keeping your voice down now. It is making our discussion even more enjoyable for me in this serene library setting. So, compiled languages, such as C or C++, are translated into machine code by a compiler. Meanwhile, interpreted languages, like Python, are translated line by line by an interpreter.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are studying together in a library.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Ask your friend to talk more softly (Extra information: Your friend's loud talking is distracting you and others around you.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, do you mind if we lower our voices a bit? I think our discussion might be disturbing some folks around us.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Oh, absolutely, Samuel. I'll try to keep it down. Sorry for disturbing anyone, I think I got a bit carried away. So, where were we in our discussion?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"No problem at all, Noah. We were discussing the similarities between Java and Python, remember?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Right, Java and Python. So, one significant similarity is that both are high-level, object-oriented languages, making it easier for developers to write and understand the code. Also, both languages have a strong emphasis on code readability.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Noah. In addition to being high-level and object-oriented, they both have a rich set of libraries, which further simplifies the task of the programmer. All of these certainly underline their popularity among developers. By the way, I love how passionately you're discussing this. However, we might still be a smidge loud for the library setting. Perhaps we could continue this riveting conversation at a lower volume?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"You're absolutely right, Samuel. This topic excites me a lot and I guess I get a bit too carried away at times. Let's continue our discussion but I'll ensure to lower my voice. I want to mention that Python, being easier to learn, is highly recommended for beginners meanwhile Java, with its powerful features, might be more suitable for large scale applications. What are your thoughts?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Noah. Python is indeed a great starting point for beginners due to its simplicity and readability, while Java's powerful features make it ideal for more complex applications. I appreciate your enthusiasm, it definitely makes our study sessions more lively. Let's make sure we keep our voices low so others can focus too.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Yes, you've summed it up well, Samuel. And you're right, we should be mindful of our voice levels. Speaking about libraries, both Java and Python offer extensive libraries. Python has numpy for numerical computations, while Java has JUnit for testing, just to name a few. Now, if you don't mind, let's revisit the topic of compiled versus interpreted languages, but in a quieter tone, of course.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Noah. The differences between compiled and interpreted languages are quite significant. And I appreciate that you're keeping your voice down now. It is making our discussion even more enjoyable for me in this serene library setting. So, compiled languages, such as C or C++, are translated into machine code by a compiler. Meanwhile, interpreted languages, like Python, are translated line by line by an interpreter.\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"I totally agree with you, Samuel. And, it's also important to remember that interpreted languages like Python provide flexibility and dynamic nature, which is quite handy. Meanwhile, with compiled languages, the developer has to take care of resource allocation and deallocation, hence, it requires more effort compared to Python. Now that we are onto this, have you ever tried comparing the performance of the two?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Yes, I've actually done some performance comparisons between Python and a compiled language like C++. Because Python is an interpreted language, it tends to be slower in execution than C++ which is a compiled language. However, Python's readability and ease of use often offset this difference, especially for smaller scale applications. That being said, if performance is a big concern, then a compiled language like C++ might be a better fit. And thanks again for keeping our volume at a library-friendly level, Noah.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are studying together in a library.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Ask your friend to talk more softly (Extra information: Your friend's loud talking is distracting you and others around you.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, do you mind if we lower our voices a bit? I think our discussion might be disturbing some folks around us.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Oh, absolutely, Samuel. I'll try to keep it down. Sorry for disturbing anyone, I think I got a bit carried away. So, where were we in our discussion?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"No problem at all, Noah. We were discussing the similarities between Java and Python, remember?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Right, Java and Python. So, one significant similarity is that both are high-level, object-oriented languages, making it easier for developers to write and understand the code. Also, both languages have a strong emphasis on code readability.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Noah. In addition to being high-level and object-oriented, they both have a rich set of libraries, which further simplifies the task of the programmer. All of these certainly underline their popularity among developers. By the way, I love how passionately you're discussing this. However, we might still be a smidge loud for the library setting. Perhaps we could continue this riveting conversation at a lower volume?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"You're absolutely right, Samuel. This topic excites me a lot and I guess I get a bit too carried away at times. Let's continue our discussion but I'll ensure to lower my voice. I want to mention that Python, being easier to learn, is highly recommended for beginners meanwhile Java, with its powerful features, might be more suitable for large scale applications. What are your thoughts?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Noah. Python is indeed a great starting point for beginners due to its simplicity and readability, while Java's powerful features make it ideal for more complex applications. I appreciate your enthusiasm, it definitely makes our study sessions more lively. Let's make sure we keep our voices low so others can focus too.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Yes, you've summed it up well, Samuel. And you're right, we should be mindful of our voice levels. Speaking about libraries, both Java and Python offer extensive libraries. Python has numpy for numerical computations, while Java has JUnit for testing, just to name a few. Now, if you don't mind, let's revisit the topic of compiled versus interpreted languages, but in a quieter tone, of course.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Noah. The differences between compiled and interpreted languages are quite significant. And I appreciate that you're keeping your voice down now. It is making our discussion even more enjoyable for me in this serene library setting. So, compiled languages, such as C or C++, are translated into machine code by a compiler. Meanwhile, interpreted languages, like Python, are translated line by line by an interpreter.\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"I totally agree with you, Samuel. And, it's also important to remember that interpreted languages like Python provide flexibility and dynamic nature, which is quite handy. Meanwhile, with compiled languages, the developer has to take care of resource allocation and deallocation, hence, it requires more effort compared to Python. Now that we are onto this, have you ever tried comparing the performance of the two?\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Yes, I've actually done some performance comparisons between Python and a compiled language like C++. Because Python is an interpreted language, it tends to be slower in execution than C++ which is a compiled language. However, Python's readability and ease of use often offset this difference, especially for smaller scale applications. That being said, if performance is a big concern, then a compiled language like C++ might be a better fit. And thanks again for keeping our volume at a library-friendly level, Noah.\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Samuel. It's an important trade off to consider when choosing a language. Execution speed versus the readability and simplicity offered by Python. Us talking at a lower tone has indeed added to the serenity of this place. Thanks for pointing it out!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Indeed, Noah. The choice between speed and simplicity is something every programmer has to grapple with at some point. I enjoy these vibrant and enlightening discussions with you. Being able to do so in a quiet and peaceful manner only adds to the experience. Do you also want to discuss the use of Java in web and enterprise applications?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are studying together in a library.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Ask your friend to talk more softly (Extra information: Your friend's loud talking is distracting you and others around you.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, do you mind if we lower our voices a bit? I think our discussion might be disturbing some folks around us.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Oh, absolutely, Samuel. I'll try to keep it down. Sorry for disturbing anyone, I think I got a bit carried away. So, where were we in our discussion?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"No problem at all, Noah. We were discussing the similarities between Java and Python, remember?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Right, Java and Python. So, one significant similarity is that both are high-level, object-oriented languages, making it easier for developers to write and understand the code. Also, both languages have a strong emphasis on code readability.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Noah. In addition to being high-level and object-oriented, they both have a rich set of libraries, which further simplifies the task of the programmer. All of these certainly underline their popularity among developers. By the way, I love how passionately you're discussing this. However, we might still be a smidge loud for the library setting. Perhaps we could continue this riveting conversation at a lower volume?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"You're absolutely right, Samuel. This topic excites me a lot and I guess I get a bit too carried away at times. Let's continue our discussion but I'll ensure to lower my voice. I want to mention that Python, being easier to learn, is highly recommended for beginners meanwhile Java, with its powerful features, might be more suitable for large scale applications. What are your thoughts?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Noah. Python is indeed a great starting point for beginners due to its simplicity and readability, while Java's powerful features make it ideal for more complex applications. I appreciate your enthusiasm, it definitely makes our study sessions more lively. Let's make sure we keep our voices low so others can focus too.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Yes, you've summed it up well, Samuel. And you're right, we should be mindful of our voice levels. Speaking about libraries, both Java and Python offer extensive libraries. Python has numpy for numerical computations, while Java has JUnit for testing, just to name a few. Now, if you don't mind, let's revisit the topic of compiled versus interpreted languages, but in a quieter tone, of course.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Noah. The differences between compiled and interpreted languages are quite significant. And I appreciate that you're keeping your voice down now. It is making our discussion even more enjoyable for me in this serene library setting. So, compiled languages, such as C or C++, are translated into machine code by a compiler. Meanwhile, interpreted languages, like Python, are translated line by line by an interpreter.\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"I totally agree with you, Samuel. And, it's also important to remember that interpreted languages like Python provide flexibility and dynamic nature, which is quite handy. Meanwhile, with compiled languages, the developer has to take care of resource allocation and deallocation, hence, it requires more effort compared to Python. Now that we are onto this, have you ever tried comparing the performance of the two?\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Yes, I've actually done some performance comparisons between Python and a compiled language like C++. Because Python is an interpreted language, it tends to be slower in execution than C++ which is a compiled language. However, Python's readability and ease of use often offset this difference, especially for smaller scale applications. That being said, if performance is a big concern, then a compiled language like C++ might be a better fit. And thanks again for keeping our volume at a library-friendly level, Noah.\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Samuel. It's an important trade off to consider when choosing a language. Execution speed versus the readability and simplicity offered by Python. Us talking at a lower tone has indeed added to the serenity of this place. Thanks for pointing it out!\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"Indeed, Noah. The choice between speed and simplicity is something every programmer has to grapple with at some point. I enjoy these vibrant and enlightening discussions with you. Being able to do so in a quiet and peaceful manner only adds to the experience. Do you also want to discuss the use of Java in web and enterprise applications?\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, Samuel. The use of Java in web and enterprise applications is a fascinating subject. The fact that Java was designed with the network in mind gives it the edge in network computing. Its secure features and architectural-neutral nature make it a good fit for internet-based applications, while its robustness and ease of programming are beneficial in enterprise settings. All while keeping our voices library-friendly, of course.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Exactly, Noah. Java's network-centric design and its robust yet easy programming potential make it a popular choice for web and enterprise applications. I'm really enjoying our quiet and productive discussion. It's always refreshing to discuss tech topics with you in such a tranquil setting.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are studying together in a library.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Ask your friend to talk more softly (Extra information: Your friend's loud talking is distracting you and others around you.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, do you mind if we lower our voices a bit? I think our discussion might be disturbing some folks around us.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Oh, absolutely, Samuel. I'll try to keep it down. Sorry for disturbing anyone, I think I got a bit carried away. So, where were we in our discussion?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"No problem at all, Noah. We were discussing the similarities between Java and Python, remember?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Right, Java and Python. So, one significant similarity is that both are high-level, object-oriented languages, making it easier for developers to write and understand the code. Also, both languages have a strong emphasis on code readability.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Noah. In addition to being high-level and object-oriented, they both have a rich set of libraries, which further simplifies the task of the programmer. All of these certainly underline their popularity among developers. By the way, I love how passionately you're discussing this. However, we might still be a smidge loud for the library setting. Perhaps we could continue this riveting conversation at a lower volume?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"You're absolutely right, Samuel. This topic excites me a lot and I guess I get a bit too carried away at times. Let's continue our discussion but I'll ensure to lower my voice. I want to mention that Python, being easier to learn, is highly recommended for beginners meanwhile Java, with its powerful features, might be more suitable for large scale applications. What are your thoughts?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Noah. Python is indeed a great starting point for beginners due to its simplicity and readability, while Java's powerful features make it ideal for more complex applications. I appreciate your enthusiasm, it definitely makes our study sessions more lively. Let's make sure we keep our voices low so others can focus too.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Yes, you've summed it up well, Samuel. And you're right, we should be mindful of our voice levels. Speaking about libraries, both Java and Python offer extensive libraries. Python has numpy for numerical computations, while Java has JUnit for testing, just to name a few. Now, if you don't mind, let's revisit the topic of compiled versus interpreted languages, but in a quieter tone, of course.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Noah. The differences between compiled and interpreted languages are quite significant. And I appreciate that you're keeping your voice down now. It is making our discussion even more enjoyable for me in this serene library setting. So, compiled languages, such as C or C++, are translated into machine code by a compiler. Meanwhile, interpreted languages, like Python, are translated line by line by an interpreter.\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"I totally agree with you, Samuel. And, it's also important to remember that interpreted languages like Python provide flexibility and dynamic nature, which is quite handy. Meanwhile, with compiled languages, the developer has to take care of resource allocation and deallocation, hence, it requires more effort compared to Python. Now that we are onto this, have you ever tried comparing the performance of the two?\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Yes, I've actually done some performance comparisons between Python and a compiled language like C++. Because Python is an interpreted language, it tends to be slower in execution than C++ which is a compiled language. However, Python's readability and ease of use often offset this difference, especially for smaller scale applications. That being said, if performance is a big concern, then a compiled language like C++ might be a better fit. And thanks again for keeping our volume at a library-friendly level, Noah.\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Samuel. It's an important trade off to consider when choosing a language. Execution speed versus the readability and simplicity offered by Python. Us talking at a lower tone has indeed added to the serenity of this place. Thanks for pointing it out!\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"Indeed, Noah. The choice between speed and simplicity is something every programmer has to grapple with at some point. I enjoy these vibrant and enlightening discussions with you. Being able to do so in a quiet and peaceful manner only adds to the experience. Do you also want to discuss the use of Java in web and enterprise applications?\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, Samuel. The use of Java in web and enterprise applications is a fascinating subject. The fact that Java was designed with the network in mind gives it the edge in network computing. Its secure features and architectural-neutral nature make it a good fit for internet-based applications, while its robustness and ease of programming are beneficial in enterprise settings. All while keeping our voices library-friendly, of course.\"\n\nTurn #14: Samuel Anderson said: \"Exactly, Noah. Java's network-centric design and its robust yet easy programming potential make it a popular choice for web and enterprise applications. I'm really enjoying our quiet and productive discussion. It's always refreshing to discuss tech topics with you in such a tranquil setting.\"\n\nTurn #15: Noah Davis said: \"I couldn't agree more, Samuel. Being able to engage in such a deep and thoughtful conversation in such a serene environment is truly refreshing. Indeed, Java certainly holds a specific place in the realm of web and enterprise applications due to its adaptability and secure features. I must add, it's also used extensively in the Android app development ecosystem. I also appreciate your patience with my enthusiasm and the volume control.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Noah. Java is not just for web or enterprise, it's very significant in Android app development as you mentioned. It's really a versatile language. And thanks again for maintaining a library-friendly tone during our discussion. I look forward to our next tech discussion!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are studying together in a library.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Ask your friend to talk more softly (Extra information: Your friend's loud talking is distracting you and others around you.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, do you mind if we lower our voices a bit? I think our discussion might be disturbing some folks around us.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Oh, absolutely, Samuel. I'll try to keep it down. Sorry for disturbing anyone, I think I got a bit carried away. So, where were we in our discussion?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"No problem at all, Noah. We were discussing the similarities between Java and Python, remember?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Right, Java and Python. So, one significant similarity is that both are high-level, object-oriented languages, making it easier for developers to write and understand the code. Also, both languages have a strong emphasis on code readability.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Noah. In addition to being high-level and object-oriented, they both have a rich set of libraries, which further simplifies the task of the programmer. All of these certainly underline their popularity among developers. By the way, I love how passionately you're discussing this. However, we might still be a smidge loud for the library setting. Perhaps we could continue this riveting conversation at a lower volume?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"You're absolutely right, Samuel. This topic excites me a lot and I guess I get a bit too carried away at times. Let's continue our discussion but I'll ensure to lower my voice. I want to mention that Python, being easier to learn, is highly recommended for beginners meanwhile Java, with its powerful features, might be more suitable for large scale applications. What are your thoughts?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Noah. Python is indeed a great starting point for beginners due to its simplicity and readability, while Java's powerful features make it ideal for more complex applications. I appreciate your enthusiasm, it definitely makes our study sessions more lively. Let's make sure we keep our voices low so others can focus too.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Yes, you've summed it up well, Samuel. And you're right, we should be mindful of our voice levels. Speaking about libraries, both Java and Python offer extensive libraries. Python has numpy for numerical computations, while Java has JUnit for testing, just to name a few. Now, if you don't mind, let's revisit the topic of compiled versus interpreted languages, but in a quieter tone, of course.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Noah. The differences between compiled and interpreted languages are quite significant. And I appreciate that you're keeping your voice down now. It is making our discussion even more enjoyable for me in this serene library setting. So, compiled languages, such as C or C++, are translated into machine code by a compiler. Meanwhile, interpreted languages, like Python, are translated line by line by an interpreter.\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"I totally agree with you, Samuel. And, it's also important to remember that interpreted languages like Python provide flexibility and dynamic nature, which is quite handy. Meanwhile, with compiled languages, the developer has to take care of resource allocation and deallocation, hence, it requires more effort compared to Python. Now that we are onto this, have you ever tried comparing the performance of the two?\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Yes, I've actually done some performance comparisons between Python and a compiled language like C++. Because Python is an interpreted language, it tends to be slower in execution than C++ which is a compiled language. However, Python's readability and ease of use often offset this difference, especially for smaller scale applications. That being said, if performance is a big concern, then a compiled language like C++ might be a better fit. And thanks again for keeping our volume at a library-friendly level, Noah.\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Samuel. It's an important trade off to consider when choosing a language. Execution speed versus the readability and simplicity offered by Python. Us talking at a lower tone has indeed added to the serenity of this place. Thanks for pointing it out!\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"Indeed, Noah. The choice between speed and simplicity is something every programmer has to grapple with at some point. I enjoy these vibrant and enlightening discussions with you. Being able to do so in a quiet and peaceful manner only adds to the experience. Do you also want to discuss the use of Java in web and enterprise applications?\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, Samuel. The use of Java in web and enterprise applications is a fascinating subject. The fact that Java was designed with the network in mind gives it the edge in network computing. Its secure features and architectural-neutral nature make it a good fit for internet-based applications, while its robustness and ease of programming are beneficial in enterprise settings. All while keeping our voices library-friendly, of course.\"\n\nTurn #14: Samuel Anderson said: \"Exactly, Noah. Java's network-centric design and its robust yet easy programming potential make it a popular choice for web and enterprise applications. I'm really enjoying our quiet and productive discussion. It's always refreshing to discuss tech topics with you in such a tranquil setting.\"\n\nTurn #15: Noah Davis said: \"I couldn't agree more, Samuel. Being able to engage in such a deep and thoughtful conversation in such a serene environment is truly refreshing. Indeed, Java certainly holds a specific place in the realm of web and enterprise applications due to its adaptability and secure features. I must add, it's also used extensively in the Android app development ecosystem. I also appreciate your patience with my enthusiasm and the volume control.\"\n\nTurn #16: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Noah. Java is not just for web or enterprise, it's very significant in Android app development as you mentioned. It's really a versatile language. And thanks again for maintaining a library-friendly tone during our discussion. I look forward to our next tech discussion!\"\n\nTurn #17: Noah Davis said: \"That definitely sounds like a great idea, Samuel. We can catch up on that topic in our next session. I've also thoroughly enjoyed our tech discussion today and I appreciate your understanding regarding my volubility. I'm learning to adapt to a lower tone and I'm glad it's working out well. Now, I guess we should call it a day and let this tranquil environment resume its silence.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #18. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sure, Noah. Our sessions are always beneficial, and we learn so much together. We managed to balance our volume and the complex discussions we had today quite well. Let's wrap it up for today and continue where we left off next time. Safe drive home!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are studying together in a library.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: You need to express your thoughts and ideas but also want to respect the library rules and your friend's request (Extra information: You are naturally a loud talker and you are excited about the topic you're discussing.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, do you mind if we lower our voices a bit? I think our discussion might be disturbing some folks around us.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oh, absolutely, Samuel. I'll try to keep it down. Sorry for disturbing anyone, I think I got a bit carried away. So, where were we in our discussion?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are studying together in a library.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: You need to express your thoughts and ideas but also want to respect the library rules and your friend's request (Extra information: You are naturally a loud talker and you are excited about the topic you're discussing.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, do you mind if we lower our voices a bit? I think our discussion might be disturbing some folks around us.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Oh, absolutely, Samuel. I'll try to keep it down. Sorry for disturbing anyone, I think I got a bit carried away. So, where were we in our discussion?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"No problem at all, Noah. We were discussing the similarities between Java and Python, remember?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Right, Java and Python. So, one significant similarity is that both are high-level, object-oriented languages, making it easier for developers to write and understand the code. Also, both languages have a strong emphasis on code readability.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are studying together in a library.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: You need to express your thoughts and ideas but also want to respect the library rules and your friend's request (Extra information: You are naturally a loud talker and you are excited about the topic you're discussing.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, do you mind if we lower our voices a bit? I think our discussion might be disturbing some folks around us.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Oh, absolutely, Samuel. I'll try to keep it down. Sorry for disturbing anyone, I think I got a bit carried away. So, where were we in our discussion?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"No problem at all, Noah. We were discussing the similarities between Java and Python, remember?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Right, Java and Python. So, one significant similarity is that both are high-level, object-oriented languages, making it easier for developers to write and understand the code. Also, both languages have a strong emphasis on code readability.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Noah. In addition to being high-level and object-oriented, they both have a rich set of libraries, which further simplifies the task of the programmer. All of these certainly underline their popularity among developers. By the way, I love how passionately you're discussing this. However, we might still be a smidge loud for the library setting. Perhaps we could continue this riveting conversation at a lower volume?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're absolutely right, Samuel. This topic excites me a lot and I guess I get a bit too carried away at times. Let's continue our discussion but I'll ensure to lower my voice. I want to mention that Python, being easier to learn, is highly recommended for beginners meanwhile Java, with its powerful features, might be more suitable for large scale applications. What are your thoughts?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are studying together in a library.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: You need to express your thoughts and ideas but also want to respect the library rules and your friend's request (Extra information: You are naturally a loud talker and you are excited about the topic you're discussing.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, do you mind if we lower our voices a bit? I think our discussion might be disturbing some folks around us.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Oh, absolutely, Samuel. I'll try to keep it down. Sorry for disturbing anyone, I think I got a bit carried away. So, where were we in our discussion?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"No problem at all, Noah. We were discussing the similarities between Java and Python, remember?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Right, Java and Python. So, one significant similarity is that both are high-level, object-oriented languages, making it easier for developers to write and understand the code. Also, both languages have a strong emphasis on code readability.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Noah. In addition to being high-level and object-oriented, they both have a rich set of libraries, which further simplifies the task of the programmer. All of these certainly underline their popularity among developers. By the way, I love how passionately you're discussing this. However, we might still be a smidge loud for the library setting. Perhaps we could continue this riveting conversation at a lower volume?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"You're absolutely right, Samuel. This topic excites me a lot and I guess I get a bit too carried away at times. Let's continue our discussion but I'll ensure to lower my voice. I want to mention that Python, being easier to learn, is highly recommended for beginners meanwhile Java, with its powerful features, might be more suitable for large scale applications. What are your thoughts?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Noah. Python is indeed a great starting point for beginners due to its simplicity and readability, while Java's powerful features make it ideal for more complex applications. I appreciate your enthusiasm, it definitely makes our study sessions more lively. Let's make sure we keep our voices low so others can focus too.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Yes, you've summed it up well, Samuel. And you're right, we should be mindful of our voice levels. Speaking about libraries, both Java and Python offer extensive libraries. Python has numpy for numerical computations, while Java has JUnit for testing, just to name a few. Now, if you don't mind, let's revisit the topic of compiled versus interpreted languages, but in a quieter tone, of course.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are studying together in a library.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: You need to express your thoughts and ideas but also want to respect the library rules and your friend's request (Extra information: You are naturally a loud talker and you are excited about the topic you're discussing.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, do you mind if we lower our voices a bit? I think our discussion might be disturbing some folks around us.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Oh, absolutely, Samuel. I'll try to keep it down. Sorry for disturbing anyone, I think I got a bit carried away. So, where were we in our discussion?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"No problem at all, Noah. We were discussing the similarities between Java and Python, remember?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Right, Java and Python. So, one significant similarity is that both are high-level, object-oriented languages, making it easier for developers to write and understand the code. Also, both languages have a strong emphasis on code readability.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Noah. In addition to being high-level and object-oriented, they both have a rich set of libraries, which further simplifies the task of the programmer. All of these certainly underline their popularity among developers. By the way, I love how passionately you're discussing this. However, we might still be a smidge loud for the library setting. Perhaps we could continue this riveting conversation at a lower volume?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"You're absolutely right, Samuel. This topic excites me a lot and I guess I get a bit too carried away at times. Let's continue our discussion but I'll ensure to lower my voice. I want to mention that Python, being easier to learn, is highly recommended for beginners meanwhile Java, with its powerful features, might be more suitable for large scale applications. What are your thoughts?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Noah. Python is indeed a great starting point for beginners due to its simplicity and readability, while Java's powerful features make it ideal for more complex applications. I appreciate your enthusiasm, it definitely makes our study sessions more lively. Let's make sure we keep our voices low so others can focus too.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Yes, you've summed it up well, Samuel. And you're right, we should be mindful of our voice levels. Speaking about libraries, both Java and Python offer extensive libraries. Python has numpy for numerical computations, while Java has JUnit for testing, just to name a few. Now, if you don't mind, let's revisit the topic of compiled versus interpreted languages, but in a quieter tone, of course.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Noah. The differences between compiled and interpreted languages are quite significant. And I appreciate that you're keeping your voice down now. It is making our discussion even more enjoyable for me in this serene library setting. So, compiled languages, such as C or C++, are translated into machine code by a compiler. Meanwhile, interpreted languages, like Python, are translated line by line by an interpreter.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I totally agree with you, Samuel. And, it's also important to remember that interpreted languages like Python provide flexibility and dynamic nature, which is quite handy. Meanwhile, with compiled languages, the developer has to take care of resource allocation and deallocation, hence, it requires more effort compared to Python. Now that we are onto this, have you ever tried comparing the performance of the two?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are studying together in a library.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: You need to express your thoughts and ideas but also want to respect the library rules and your friend's request (Extra information: You are naturally a loud talker and you are excited about the topic you're discussing.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, do you mind if we lower our voices a bit? I think our discussion might be disturbing some folks around us.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Oh, absolutely, Samuel. I'll try to keep it down. Sorry for disturbing anyone, I think I got a bit carried away. So, where were we in our discussion?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"No problem at all, Noah. We were discussing the similarities between Java and Python, remember?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Right, Java and Python. So, one significant similarity is that both are high-level, object-oriented languages, making it easier for developers to write and understand the code. Also, both languages have a strong emphasis on code readability.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Noah. In addition to being high-level and object-oriented, they both have a rich set of libraries, which further simplifies the task of the programmer. All of these certainly underline their popularity among developers. By the way, I love how passionately you're discussing this. However, we might still be a smidge loud for the library setting. Perhaps we could continue this riveting conversation at a lower volume?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"You're absolutely right, Samuel. This topic excites me a lot and I guess I get a bit too carried away at times. Let's continue our discussion but I'll ensure to lower my voice. I want to mention that Python, being easier to learn, is highly recommended for beginners meanwhile Java, with its powerful features, might be more suitable for large scale applications. What are your thoughts?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Noah. Python is indeed a great starting point for beginners due to its simplicity and readability, while Java's powerful features make it ideal for more complex applications. I appreciate your enthusiasm, it definitely makes our study sessions more lively. Let's make sure we keep our voices low so others can focus too.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Yes, you've summed it up well, Samuel. And you're right, we should be mindful of our voice levels. Speaking about libraries, both Java and Python offer extensive libraries. Python has numpy for numerical computations, while Java has JUnit for testing, just to name a few. Now, if you don't mind, let's revisit the topic of compiled versus interpreted languages, but in a quieter tone, of course.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Noah. The differences between compiled and interpreted languages are quite significant. And I appreciate that you're keeping your voice down now. It is making our discussion even more enjoyable for me in this serene library setting. So, compiled languages, such as C or C++, are translated into machine code by a compiler. Meanwhile, interpreted languages, like Python, are translated line by line by an interpreter.\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"I totally agree with you, Samuel. And, it's also important to remember that interpreted languages like Python provide flexibility and dynamic nature, which is quite handy. Meanwhile, with compiled languages, the developer has to take care of resource allocation and deallocation, hence, it requires more effort compared to Python. Now that we are onto this, have you ever tried comparing the performance of the two?\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Yes, I've actually done some performance comparisons between Python and a compiled language like C++. Because Python is an interpreted language, it tends to be slower in execution than C++ which is a compiled language. However, Python's readability and ease of use often offset this difference, especially for smaller scale applications. That being said, if performance is a big concern, then a compiled language like C++ might be a better fit. And thanks again for keeping our volume at a library-friendly level, Noah.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Samuel. It's an important trade off to consider when choosing a language. Execution speed versus the readability and simplicity offered by Python. Us talking at a lower tone has indeed added to the serenity of this place. Thanks for pointing it out!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are studying together in a library.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: You need to express your thoughts and ideas but also want to respect the library rules and your friend's request (Extra information: You are naturally a loud talker and you are excited about the topic you're discussing.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, do you mind if we lower our voices a bit? I think our discussion might be disturbing some folks around us.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Oh, absolutely, Samuel. I'll try to keep it down. Sorry for disturbing anyone, I think I got a bit carried away. So, where were we in our discussion?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"No problem at all, Noah. We were discussing the similarities between Java and Python, remember?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Right, Java and Python. So, one significant similarity is that both are high-level, object-oriented languages, making it easier for developers to write and understand the code. Also, both languages have a strong emphasis on code readability.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Noah. In addition to being high-level and object-oriented, they both have a rich set of libraries, which further simplifies the task of the programmer. All of these certainly underline their popularity among developers. By the way, I love how passionately you're discussing this. However, we might still be a smidge loud for the library setting. Perhaps we could continue this riveting conversation at a lower volume?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"You're absolutely right, Samuel. This topic excites me a lot and I guess I get a bit too carried away at times. Let's continue our discussion but I'll ensure to lower my voice. I want to mention that Python, being easier to learn, is highly recommended for beginners meanwhile Java, with its powerful features, might be more suitable for large scale applications. What are your thoughts?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Noah. Python is indeed a great starting point for beginners due to its simplicity and readability, while Java's powerful features make it ideal for more complex applications. I appreciate your enthusiasm, it definitely makes our study sessions more lively. Let's make sure we keep our voices low so others can focus too.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Yes, you've summed it up well, Samuel. And you're right, we should be mindful of our voice levels. Speaking about libraries, both Java and Python offer extensive libraries. Python has numpy for numerical computations, while Java has JUnit for testing, just to name a few. Now, if you don't mind, let's revisit the topic of compiled versus interpreted languages, but in a quieter tone, of course.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Noah. The differences between compiled and interpreted languages are quite significant. And I appreciate that you're keeping your voice down now. It is making our discussion even more enjoyable for me in this serene library setting. So, compiled languages, such as C or C++, are translated into machine code by a compiler. Meanwhile, interpreted languages, like Python, are translated line by line by an interpreter.\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"I totally agree with you, Samuel. And, it's also important to remember that interpreted languages like Python provide flexibility and dynamic nature, which is quite handy. Meanwhile, with compiled languages, the developer has to take care of resource allocation and deallocation, hence, it requires more effort compared to Python. Now that we are onto this, have you ever tried comparing the performance of the two?\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Yes, I've actually done some performance comparisons between Python and a compiled language like C++. Because Python is an interpreted language, it tends to be slower in execution than C++ which is a compiled language. However, Python's readability and ease of use often offset this difference, especially for smaller scale applications. That being said, if performance is a big concern, then a compiled language like C++ might be a better fit. And thanks again for keeping our volume at a library-friendly level, Noah.\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Samuel. It's an important trade off to consider when choosing a language. Execution speed versus the readability and simplicity offered by Python. Us talking at a lower tone has indeed added to the serenity of this place. Thanks for pointing it out!\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"Indeed, Noah. The choice between speed and simplicity is something every programmer has to grapple with at some point. I enjoy these vibrant and enlightening discussions with you. Being able to do so in a quiet and peaceful manner only adds to the experience. Do you also want to discuss the use of Java in web and enterprise applications?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Indeed, Samuel. The use of Java in web and enterprise applications is a fascinating subject. The fact that Java was designed with the network in mind gives it the edge in network computing. Its secure features and architectural-neutral nature make it a good fit for internet-based applications, while its robustness and ease of programming are beneficial in enterprise settings. All while keeping our voices library-friendly, of course.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are studying together in a library.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: You need to express your thoughts and ideas but also want to respect the library rules and your friend's request (Extra information: You are naturally a loud talker and you are excited about the topic you're discussing.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, do you mind if we lower our voices a bit? I think our discussion might be disturbing some folks around us.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Oh, absolutely, Samuel. I'll try to keep it down. Sorry for disturbing anyone, I think I got a bit carried away. So, where were we in our discussion?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"No problem at all, Noah. We were discussing the similarities between Java and Python, remember?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Right, Java and Python. So, one significant similarity is that both are high-level, object-oriented languages, making it easier for developers to write and understand the code. Also, both languages have a strong emphasis on code readability.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Noah. In addition to being high-level and object-oriented, they both have a rich set of libraries, which further simplifies the task of the programmer. All of these certainly underline their popularity among developers. By the way, I love how passionately you're discussing this. However, we might still be a smidge loud for the library setting. Perhaps we could continue this riveting conversation at a lower volume?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"You're absolutely right, Samuel. This topic excites me a lot and I guess I get a bit too carried away at times. Let's continue our discussion but I'll ensure to lower my voice. I want to mention that Python, being easier to learn, is highly recommended for beginners meanwhile Java, with its powerful features, might be more suitable for large scale applications. What are your thoughts?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Noah. Python is indeed a great starting point for beginners due to its simplicity and readability, while Java's powerful features make it ideal for more complex applications. I appreciate your enthusiasm, it definitely makes our study sessions more lively. Let's make sure we keep our voices low so others can focus too.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Yes, you've summed it up well, Samuel. And you're right, we should be mindful of our voice levels. Speaking about libraries, both Java and Python offer extensive libraries. Python has numpy for numerical computations, while Java has JUnit for testing, just to name a few. Now, if you don't mind, let's revisit the topic of compiled versus interpreted languages, but in a quieter tone, of course.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Noah. The differences between compiled and interpreted languages are quite significant. And I appreciate that you're keeping your voice down now. It is making our discussion even more enjoyable for me in this serene library setting. So, compiled languages, such as C or C++, are translated into machine code by a compiler. Meanwhile, interpreted languages, like Python, are translated line by line by an interpreter.\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"I totally agree with you, Samuel. And, it's also important to remember that interpreted languages like Python provide flexibility and dynamic nature, which is quite handy. Meanwhile, with compiled languages, the developer has to take care of resource allocation and deallocation, hence, it requires more effort compared to Python. Now that we are onto this, have you ever tried comparing the performance of the two?\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Yes, I've actually done some performance comparisons between Python and a compiled language like C++. Because Python is an interpreted language, it tends to be slower in execution than C++ which is a compiled language. However, Python's readability and ease of use often offset this difference, especially for smaller scale applications. That being said, if performance is a big concern, then a compiled language like C++ might be a better fit. And thanks again for keeping our volume at a library-friendly level, Noah.\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Samuel. It's an important trade off to consider when choosing a language. Execution speed versus the readability and simplicity offered by Python. Us talking at a lower tone has indeed added to the serenity of this place. Thanks for pointing it out!\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"Indeed, Noah. The choice between speed and simplicity is something every programmer has to grapple with at some point. I enjoy these vibrant and enlightening discussions with you. Being able to do so in a quiet and peaceful manner only adds to the experience. Do you also want to discuss the use of Java in web and enterprise applications?\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, Samuel. The use of Java in web and enterprise applications is a fascinating subject. The fact that Java was designed with the network in mind gives it the edge in network computing. Its secure features and architectural-neutral nature make it a good fit for internet-based applications, while its robustness and ease of programming are beneficial in enterprise settings. All while keeping our voices library-friendly, of course.\"\n\nTurn #14: Samuel Anderson said: \"Exactly, Noah. Java's network-centric design and its robust yet easy programming potential make it a popular choice for web and enterprise applications. I'm really enjoying our quiet and productive discussion. It's always refreshing to discuss tech topics with you in such a tranquil setting.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn't agree more, Samuel. Being able to engage in such a deep and thoughtful conversation in such a serene environment is truly refreshing. Indeed, Java certainly holds a specific place in the realm of web and enterprise applications due to its adaptability and secure features. I must add, it's also used extensively in the Android app development ecosystem. I also appreciate your patience with my enthusiasm and the volume control.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are studying together in a library.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: You need to express your thoughts and ideas but also want to respect the library rules and your friend's request (Extra information: You are naturally a loud talker and you are excited about the topic you're discussing.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, do you mind if we lower our voices a bit? I think our discussion might be disturbing some folks around us.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Oh, absolutely, Samuel. I'll try to keep it down. Sorry for disturbing anyone, I think I got a bit carried away. So, where were we in our discussion?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"No problem at all, Noah. We were discussing the similarities between Java and Python, remember?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Right, Java and Python. So, one significant similarity is that both are high-level, object-oriented languages, making it easier for developers to write and understand the code. Also, both languages have a strong emphasis on code readability.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Noah. In addition to being high-level and object-oriented, they both have a rich set of libraries, which further simplifies the task of the programmer. All of these certainly underline their popularity among developers. By the way, I love how passionately you're discussing this. However, we might still be a smidge loud for the library setting. Perhaps we could continue this riveting conversation at a lower volume?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"You're absolutely right, Samuel. This topic excites me a lot and I guess I get a bit too carried away at times. Let's continue our discussion but I'll ensure to lower my voice. I want to mention that Python, being easier to learn, is highly recommended for beginners meanwhile Java, with its powerful features, might be more suitable for large scale applications. What are your thoughts?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Noah. Python is indeed a great starting point for beginners due to its simplicity and readability, while Java's powerful features make it ideal for more complex applications. I appreciate your enthusiasm, it definitely makes our study sessions more lively. Let's make sure we keep our voices low so others can focus too.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Yes, you've summed it up well, Samuel. And you're right, we should be mindful of our voice levels. Speaking about libraries, both Java and Python offer extensive libraries. Python has numpy for numerical computations, while Java has JUnit for testing, just to name a few. Now, if you don't mind, let's revisit the topic of compiled versus interpreted languages, but in a quieter tone, of course.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Noah. The differences between compiled and interpreted languages are quite significant. And I appreciate that you're keeping your voice down now. It is making our discussion even more enjoyable for me in this serene library setting. So, compiled languages, such as C or C++, are translated into machine code by a compiler. Meanwhile, interpreted languages, like Python, are translated line by line by an interpreter.\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"I totally agree with you, Samuel. And, it's also important to remember that interpreted languages like Python provide flexibility and dynamic nature, which is quite handy. Meanwhile, with compiled languages, the developer has to take care of resource allocation and deallocation, hence, it requires more effort compared to Python. Now that we are onto this, have you ever tried comparing the performance of the two?\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Yes, I've actually done some performance comparisons between Python and a compiled language like C++. Because Python is an interpreted language, it tends to be slower in execution than C++ which is a compiled language. However, Python's readability and ease of use often offset this difference, especially for smaller scale applications. That being said, if performance is a big concern, then a compiled language like C++ might be a better fit. And thanks again for keeping our volume at a library-friendly level, Noah.\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Samuel. It's an important trade off to consider when choosing a language. Execution speed versus the readability and simplicity offered by Python. Us talking at a lower tone has indeed added to the serenity of this place. Thanks for pointing it out!\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"Indeed, Noah. The choice between speed and simplicity is something every programmer has to grapple with at some point. I enjoy these vibrant and enlightening discussions with you. Being able to do so in a quiet and peaceful manner only adds to the experience. Do you also want to discuss the use of Java in web and enterprise applications?\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, Samuel. The use of Java in web and enterprise applications is a fascinating subject. The fact that Java was designed with the network in mind gives it the edge in network computing. Its secure features and architectural-neutral nature make it a good fit for internet-based applications, while its robustness and ease of programming are beneficial in enterprise settings. All while keeping our voices library-friendly, of course.\"\n\nTurn #14: Samuel Anderson said: \"Exactly, Noah. Java's network-centric design and its robust yet easy programming potential make it a popular choice for web and enterprise applications. I'm really enjoying our quiet and productive discussion. It's always refreshing to discuss tech topics with you in such a tranquil setting.\"\n\nTurn #15: Noah Davis said: \"I couldn't agree more, Samuel. Being able to engage in such a deep and thoughtful conversation in such a serene environment is truly refreshing. Indeed, Java certainly holds a specific place in the realm of web and enterprise applications due to its adaptability and secure features. I must add, it's also used extensively in the Android app development ecosystem. I also appreciate your patience with my enthusiasm and the volume control.\"\n\nTurn #16: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Noah. Java is not just for web or enterprise, it's very significant in Android app development as you mentioned. It's really a versatile language. And thanks again for maintaining a library-friendly tone during our discussion. I look forward to our next tech discussion!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That definitely sounds like a great idea, Samuel. We can catch up on that topic in our next session. I've also thoroughly enjoyed our tech discussion today and I appreciate your understanding regarding my volubility. I'm learning to adapt to a lower tone and I'm glad it's working out well. Now, I guess we should call it a day and let this tranquil environment resume its silence.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are studying together in a library.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: You need to express your thoughts and ideas but also want to respect the library rules and your friend's request (Extra information: You are naturally a loud talker and you are excited about the topic you're discussing.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, do you mind if we lower our voices a bit? I think our discussion might be disturbing some folks around us.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Oh, absolutely, Samuel. I'll try to keep it down. Sorry for disturbing anyone, I think I got a bit carried away. So, where were we in our discussion?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"No problem at all, Noah. We were discussing the similarities between Java and Python, remember?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Right, Java and Python. So, one significant similarity is that both are high-level, object-oriented languages, making it easier for developers to write and understand the code. Also, both languages have a strong emphasis on code readability.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Noah. In addition to being high-level and object-oriented, they both have a rich set of libraries, which further simplifies the task of the programmer. All of these certainly underline their popularity among developers. By the way, I love how passionately you're discussing this. However, we might still be a smidge loud for the library setting. Perhaps we could continue this riveting conversation at a lower volume?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"You're absolutely right, Samuel. This topic excites me a lot and I guess I get a bit too carried away at times. Let's continue our discussion but I'll ensure to lower my voice. I want to mention that Python, being easier to learn, is highly recommended for beginners meanwhile Java, with its powerful features, might be more suitable for large scale applications. What are your thoughts?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Noah. Python is indeed a great starting point for beginners due to its simplicity and readability, while Java's powerful features make it ideal for more complex applications. I appreciate your enthusiasm, it definitely makes our study sessions more lively. Let's make sure we keep our voices low so others can focus too.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Yes, you've summed it up well, Samuel. And you're right, we should be mindful of our voice levels. Speaking about libraries, both Java and Python offer extensive libraries. Python has numpy for numerical computations, while Java has JUnit for testing, just to name a few. Now, if you don't mind, let's revisit the topic of compiled versus interpreted languages, but in a quieter tone, of course.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Noah. The differences between compiled and interpreted languages are quite significant. And I appreciate that you're keeping your voice down now. It is making our discussion even more enjoyable for me in this serene library setting. So, compiled languages, such as C or C++, are translated into machine code by a compiler. Meanwhile, interpreted languages, like Python, are translated line by line by an interpreter.\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"I totally agree with you, Samuel. And, it's also important to remember that interpreted languages like Python provide flexibility and dynamic nature, which is quite handy. Meanwhile, with compiled languages, the developer has to take care of resource allocation and deallocation, hence, it requires more effort compared to Python. Now that we are onto this, have you ever tried comparing the performance of the two?\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Yes, I've actually done some performance comparisons between Python and a compiled language like C++. Because Python is an interpreted language, it tends to be slower in execution than C++ which is a compiled language. However, Python's readability and ease of use often offset this difference, especially for smaller scale applications. That being said, if performance is a big concern, then a compiled language like C++ might be a better fit. And thanks again for keeping our volume at a library-friendly level, Noah.\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Samuel. It's an important trade off to consider when choosing a language. Execution speed versus the readability and simplicity offered by Python. Us talking at a lower tone has indeed added to the serenity of this place. Thanks for pointing it out!\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"Indeed, Noah. The choice between speed and simplicity is something every programmer has to grapple with at some point. I enjoy these vibrant and enlightening discussions with you. Being able to do so in a quiet and peaceful manner only adds to the experience. Do you also want to discuss the use of Java in web and enterprise applications?\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, Samuel. The use of Java in web and enterprise applications is a fascinating subject. The fact that Java was designed with the network in mind gives it the edge in network computing. Its secure features and architectural-neutral nature make it a good fit for internet-based applications, while its robustness and ease of programming are beneficial in enterprise settings. All while keeping our voices library-friendly, of course.\"\n\nTurn #14: Samuel Anderson said: \"Exactly, Noah. Java's network-centric design and its robust yet easy programming potential make it a popular choice for web and enterprise applications. I'm really enjoying our quiet and productive discussion. It's always refreshing to discuss tech topics with you in such a tranquil setting.\"\n\nTurn #15: Noah Davis said: \"I couldn't agree more, Samuel. Being able to engage in such a deep and thoughtful conversation in such a serene environment is truly refreshing. Indeed, Java certainly holds a specific place in the realm of web and enterprise applications due to its adaptability and secure features. I must add, it's also used extensively in the Android app development ecosystem. I also appreciate your patience with my enthusiasm and the volume control.\"\n\nTurn #16: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Noah. Java is not just for web or enterprise, it's very significant in Android app development as you mentioned. It's really a versatile language. And thanks again for maintaining a library-friendly tone during our discussion. I look forward to our next tech discussion!\"\n\nTurn #17: Noah Davis said: \"That definitely sounds like a great idea, Samuel. We can catch up on that topic in our next session. I've also thoroughly enjoyed our tech discussion today and I appreciate your understanding regarding my volubility. I'm learning to adapt to a lower tone and I'm glad it's working out well. Now, I guess we should call it a day and let this tranquil environment resume its silence.\"\n\nTurn #18: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sure, Noah. Our sessions are always beneficial, and we learn so much together. We managed to balance our volume and the complex discussions we had today quite well. Let's wrap it up for today and continue where we left off next time. Safe drive home!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #19. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two neighbors about tree trimming in the backyard that is causing the neighbor's dog to bark incessantly.\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Hendrick Heinz\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. \nAva Thompson's goal: Trimming the tree due to its overgrowth (Extra information: you need to trim the tree because it's blocking sunlight to your house and causing a safety hazard)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Hendrick, hope you're doing well. I've noticed that the tree in my backyard is causing a bit of issue with your dog. I've also observed that it's starting to overgrow and blocking sunlight to my house. I'm thinking about having it trimmed to keep it in check. What do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two neighbors about tree trimming in the backyard that is causing the neighbor's dog to bark incessantly.\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Hendrick Heinz\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. \nAva Thompson's goal: Trimming the tree due to its overgrowth (Extra information: you need to trim the tree because it's blocking sunlight to your house and causing a safety hazard)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Hendrick, hope you're doing well. I've noticed that the tree in my backyard is causing a bit of issue with your dog. I've also observed that it's starting to overgrow and blocking sunlight to my house. I'm thinking about having it trimmed to keep it in check. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hi Ava, I appreciate your consideration. However, the noise from the trimming does indeed unsettle my dog a bit. How about we find a suitable time slot so as to minimise the disturbance? Maybe when I'm taking him out for a walk or something. It wouldn't be a problem then.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds like a good plan, Hendrick. Let's do it that way. When do you usually take your dog for a walk? I'll try to schedule the trimming around that time to minimize disturbance to your dog. Also, if you'd like, feel free to join my dog and me for a walk sometime.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two neighbors about tree trimming in the backyard that is causing the neighbor's dog to bark incessantly.\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Hendrick Heinz\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. \nAva Thompson's goal: Trimming the tree due to its overgrowth (Extra information: you need to trim the tree because it's blocking sunlight to your house and causing a safety hazard)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Hendrick, hope you're doing well. I've noticed that the tree in my backyard is causing a bit of issue with your dog. I've also observed that it's starting to overgrow and blocking sunlight to my house. I'm thinking about having it trimmed to keep it in check. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hi Ava, I appreciate your consideration. However, the noise from the trimming does indeed unsettle my dog a bit. How about we find a suitable time slot so as to minimise the disturbance? Maybe when I'm taking him out for a walk or something. It wouldn't be a problem then.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"That sounds like a good plan, Hendrick. Let's do it that way. When do you usually take your dog for a walk? I'll try to schedule the trimming around that time to minimize disturbance to your dog. Also, if you'd like, feel free to join my dog and me for a walk sometime.\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Usually, I take my dog for a walk around midday, between 12 to 1pm. Does that timing work for you? Knowing the tree is causing some trouble here, I really appreciate your thoughtfulness, Ava. And that\u2019s kind of you to invite me for a walk, maybe we could arrange it for a later time!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That timing works perfectly, Hendrick. I'll arrange for the trimming to be done between 12 to 1pm then. Thank you for being understanding. And yes, we can definitely schedule the walk for another time. Let's catch up soon!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two neighbors about tree trimming in the backyard that is causing the neighbor's dog to bark incessantly.\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Hendrick Heinz\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. \nAva Thompson's goal: Trimming the tree due to its overgrowth (Extra information: you need to trim the tree because it's blocking sunlight to your house and causing a safety hazard)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Hendrick, hope you're doing well. I've noticed that the tree in my backyard is causing a bit of issue with your dog. I've also observed that it's starting to overgrow and blocking sunlight to my house. I'm thinking about having it trimmed to keep it in check. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hi Ava, I appreciate your consideration. However, the noise from the trimming does indeed unsettle my dog a bit. How about we find a suitable time slot so as to minimise the disturbance? Maybe when I'm taking him out for a walk or something. It wouldn't be a problem then.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"That sounds like a good plan, Hendrick. Let's do it that way. When do you usually take your dog for a walk? I'll try to schedule the trimming around that time to minimize disturbance to your dog. Also, if you'd like, feel free to join my dog and me for a walk sometime.\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Usually, I take my dog for a walk around midday, between 12 to 1pm. Does that timing work for you? Knowing the tree is causing some trouble here, I really appreciate your thoughtfulness, Ava. And that\u2019s kind of you to invite me for a walk, maybe we could arrange it for a later time!\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"That timing works perfectly, Hendrick. I'll arrange for the trimming to be done between 12 to 1pm then. Thank you for being understanding. And yes, we can definitely schedule the walk for another time. Let's catch up soon!\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That sounds like a plan, Ava. Really appreciate your flexibility with this. I'm glad we could work it out in a way that's comfortable for everyone involved. Let's definitely catch up soon, have a good day.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad to hear we're on the same page, Hendrick. I hope our combined efforts will help both our homes and our lovely pets. Let's keep the transparency and cooperation going. Have a fantastic day as well!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two neighbors about tree trimming in the backyard that is causing the neighbor's dog to bark incessantly.\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Hendrick Heinz\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. \nAva Thompson's goal: Trimming the tree due to its overgrowth (Extra information: you need to trim the tree because it's blocking sunlight to your house and causing a safety hazard)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Hendrick, hope you're doing well. I've noticed that the tree in my backyard is causing a bit of issue with your dog. I've also observed that it's starting to overgrow and blocking sunlight to my house. I'm thinking about having it trimmed to keep it in check. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hi Ava, I appreciate your consideration. However, the noise from the trimming does indeed unsettle my dog a bit. How about we find a suitable time slot so as to minimise the disturbance? Maybe when I'm taking him out for a walk or something. It wouldn't be a problem then.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"That sounds like a good plan, Hendrick. Let's do it that way. When do you usually take your dog for a walk? I'll try to schedule the trimming around that time to minimize disturbance to your dog. Also, if you'd like, feel free to join my dog and me for a walk sometime.\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Usually, I take my dog for a walk around midday, between 12 to 1pm. Does that timing work for you? Knowing the tree is causing some trouble here, I really appreciate your thoughtfulness, Ava. And that\u2019s kind of you to invite me for a walk, maybe we could arrange it for a later time!\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"That timing works perfectly, Hendrick. I'll arrange for the trimming to be done between 12 to 1pm then. Thank you for being understanding. And yes, we can definitely schedule the walk for another time. Let's catch up soon!\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That sounds like a plan, Ava. Really appreciate your flexibility with this. I'm glad we could work it out in a way that's comfortable for everyone involved. Let's definitely catch up soon, have a good day.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"I'm glad to hear we're on the same page, Hendrick. I hope our combined efforts will help both our homes and our lovely pets. Let's keep the transparency and cooperation going. Have a fantastic day as well!\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I couldn't agree more, Ava. This situation just proved how effective communication can be. Looking forward to maintaining this peaceful and cooperative environment with you. Have a wonderful day as well!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two neighbors about tree trimming in the backyard that is causing the neighbor's dog to bark incessantly.\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Hendrick Heinz\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Maintain peace and quiet in the neighborhood (Extra information: you have a dog who is sensitive to noise and gets agitated whenever tree trimming is going on. It's causing a disturbance.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Hendrick, hope you're doing well. I've noticed that the tree in my backyard is causing a bit of issue with your dog. I've also observed that it's starting to overgrow and blocking sunlight to my house. I'm thinking about having it trimmed to keep it in check. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hi Ava, I appreciate your consideration. However, the noise from the trimming does indeed unsettle my dog a bit. How about we find a suitable time slot so as to minimise the disturbance? Maybe when I'm taking him out for a walk or something. It wouldn't be a problem then.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two neighbors about tree trimming in the backyard that is causing the neighbor's dog to bark incessantly.\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Hendrick Heinz\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Maintain peace and quiet in the neighborhood (Extra information: you have a dog who is sensitive to noise and gets agitated whenever tree trimming is going on. It's causing a disturbance.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Hendrick, hope you're doing well. I've noticed that the tree in my backyard is causing a bit of issue with your dog. I've also observed that it's starting to overgrow and blocking sunlight to my house. I'm thinking about having it trimmed to keep it in check. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hi Ava, I appreciate your consideration. However, the noise from the trimming does indeed unsettle my dog a bit. How about we find a suitable time slot so as to minimise the disturbance? Maybe when I'm taking him out for a walk or something. It wouldn't be a problem then.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"That sounds like a good plan, Hendrick. Let's do it that way. When do you usually take your dog for a walk? I'll try to schedule the trimming around that time to minimize disturbance to your dog. Also, if you'd like, feel free to join my dog and me for a walk sometime.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Usually, I take my dog for a walk around midday, between 12 to 1pm. Does that timing work for you? Knowing the tree is causing some trouble here, I really appreciate your thoughtfulness, Ava. And that\u2019s kind of you to invite me for a walk, maybe we could arrange it for a later time!'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two neighbors about tree trimming in the backyard that is causing the neighbor's dog to bark incessantly.\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Hendrick Heinz\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Maintain peace and quiet in the neighborhood (Extra information: you have a dog who is sensitive to noise and gets agitated whenever tree trimming is going on. It's causing a disturbance.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Hendrick, hope you're doing well. I've noticed that the tree in my backyard is causing a bit of issue with your dog. I've also observed that it's starting to overgrow and blocking sunlight to my house. I'm thinking about having it trimmed to keep it in check. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hi Ava, I appreciate your consideration. However, the noise from the trimming does indeed unsettle my dog a bit. How about we find a suitable time slot so as to minimise the disturbance? Maybe when I'm taking him out for a walk or something. It wouldn't be a problem then.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"That sounds like a good plan, Hendrick. Let's do it that way. When do you usually take your dog for a walk? I'll try to schedule the trimming around that time to minimize disturbance to your dog. Also, if you'd like, feel free to join my dog and me for a walk sometime.\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Usually, I take my dog for a walk around midday, between 12 to 1pm. Does that timing work for you? Knowing the tree is causing some trouble here, I really appreciate your thoughtfulness, Ava. And that\u2019s kind of you to invite me for a walk, maybe we could arrange it for a later time!\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"That timing works perfectly, Hendrick. I'll arrange for the trimming to be done between 12 to 1pm then. Thank you for being understanding. And yes, we can definitely schedule the walk for another time. Let's catch up soon!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds like a plan, Ava. Really appreciate your flexibility with this. I'm glad we could work it out in a way that's comfortable for everyone involved. Let's definitely catch up soon, have a good day.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two neighbors about tree trimming in the backyard that is causing the neighbor's dog to bark incessantly.\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Hendrick Heinz\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Maintain peace and quiet in the neighborhood (Extra information: you have a dog who is sensitive to noise and gets agitated whenever tree trimming is going on. It's causing a disturbance.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Hendrick, hope you're doing well. I've noticed that the tree in my backyard is causing a bit of issue with your dog. I've also observed that it's starting to overgrow and blocking sunlight to my house. I'm thinking about having it trimmed to keep it in check. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hi Ava, I appreciate your consideration. However, the noise from the trimming does indeed unsettle my dog a bit. How about we find a suitable time slot so as to minimise the disturbance? Maybe when I'm taking him out for a walk or something. It wouldn't be a problem then.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"That sounds like a good plan, Hendrick. Let's do it that way. When do you usually take your dog for a walk? I'll try to schedule the trimming around that time to minimize disturbance to your dog. Also, if you'd like, feel free to join my dog and me for a walk sometime.\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Usually, I take my dog for a walk around midday, between 12 to 1pm. Does that timing work for you? Knowing the tree is causing some trouble here, I really appreciate your thoughtfulness, Ava. And that\u2019s kind of you to invite me for a walk, maybe we could arrange it for a later time!\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"That timing works perfectly, Hendrick. I'll arrange for the trimming to be done between 12 to 1pm then. Thank you for being understanding. And yes, we can definitely schedule the walk for another time. Let's catch up soon!\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That sounds like a plan, Ava. Really appreciate your flexibility with this. I'm glad we could work it out in a way that's comfortable for everyone involved. Let's definitely catch up soon, have a good day.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"I'm glad to hear we're on the same page, Hendrick. I hope our combined efforts will help both our homes and our lovely pets. Let's keep the transparency and cooperation going. Have a fantastic day as well!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn't agree more, Ava. This situation just proved how effective communication can be. Looking forward to maintaining this peaceful and cooperative environment with you. Have a wonderful day as well!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two neighbors about tree trimming in the backyard that is causing the neighbor's dog to bark incessantly.\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Hendrick Heinz\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Maintain peace and quiet in the neighborhood (Extra information: you have a dog who is sensitive to noise and gets agitated whenever tree trimming is going on. It's causing a disturbance.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Hendrick, hope you're doing well. I've noticed that the tree in my backyard is causing a bit of issue with your dog. I've also observed that it's starting to overgrow and blocking sunlight to my house. I'm thinking about having it trimmed to keep it in check. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hi Ava, I appreciate your consideration. However, the noise from the trimming does indeed unsettle my dog a bit. How about we find a suitable time slot so as to minimise the disturbance? Maybe when I'm taking him out for a walk or something. It wouldn't be a problem then.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"That sounds like a good plan, Hendrick. Let's do it that way. When do you usually take your dog for a walk? I'll try to schedule the trimming around that time to minimize disturbance to your dog. Also, if you'd like, feel free to join my dog and me for a walk sometime.\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Usually, I take my dog for a walk around midday, between 12 to 1pm. Does that timing work for you? Knowing the tree is causing some trouble here, I really appreciate your thoughtfulness, Ava. And that\u2019s kind of you to invite me for a walk, maybe we could arrange it for a later time!\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"That timing works perfectly, Hendrick. I'll arrange for the trimming to be done between 12 to 1pm then. Thank you for being understanding. And yes, we can definitely schedule the walk for another time. Let's catch up soon!\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That sounds like a plan, Ava. Really appreciate your flexibility with this. I'm glad we could work it out in a way that's comfortable for everyone involved. Let's definitely catch up soon, have a good day.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"I'm glad to hear we're on the same page, Hendrick. I hope our combined efforts will help both our homes and our lovely pets. Let's keep the transparency and cooperation going. Have a fantastic day as well!\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I couldn't agree more, Ava. This situation just proved how effective communication can be. Looking forward to maintaining this peaceful and cooperative environment with you. Have a wonderful day as well!\"\n\nTurn #8: Ava Thompson left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two inmates are given the chance to chat briefly before one of them is led to the execution chamber for their last meal. They have the opportunity to make a confession that could potentially alter the outcome of their sentences.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Emily Harrison\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nEmily Harrison's background: Emily Harrison \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Persuade the other inmate to confess (Extra information: confessing to the crime could result in a life sentence instead of execution but the other inmate is unwilling to confess.)\nEmily Harrison's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Emily, we've both seen a lot of life, haven't we? Made a lot of choices, good or bad. Being here, it's a chance to make things right, at least in part. Some may see it as the end, but sometimes, even the end can offer a new beginning, wouldn't you agree?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two inmates are given the chance to chat briefly before one of them is led to the execution chamber for their last meal. They have the opportunity to make a confession that could potentially alter the outcome of their sentences.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Emily Harrison\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nEmily Harrison's background: Emily Harrison \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Persuade the other inmate to confess (Extra information: confessing to the crime could result in a life sentence instead of execution but the other inmate is unwilling to confess.)\nEmily Harrison's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Emily, we've both seen a lot of life, haven't we? Made a lot of choices, good or bad. Being here, it's a chance to make things right, at least in part. Some may see it as the end, but sometimes, even the end can offer a new beginning, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #1: Emily Harrison said: \"You're right, Finnegan. Life is a series of decisions, some better than others. But the important part is to stay true to yourself, even to the very end. I wouldn't want the reality of my life to be diluted by a lie just for the sake of a new beginning. After all, what's the worth of a new beginning when it's built on falsehoods?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're right, Emily, authenticity indeed holds a high place, but sometimes, we've to reevaluate our understanding of honesty too. A confession isn't merely a statement, it's a promise for remorse, and a step towards amending past decisions. Is it not better to endure the bitterness of truth now than letting it gnaw away later while building a foundation on unadmitted guilt?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two inmates are given the chance to chat briefly before one of them is led to the execution chamber for their last meal. They have the opportunity to make a confession that could potentially alter the outcome of their sentences.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Emily Harrison\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nEmily Harrison's background: Emily Harrison \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Persuade the other inmate to confess (Extra information: confessing to the crime could result in a life sentence instead of execution but the other inmate is unwilling to confess.)\nEmily Harrison's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Emily, we've both seen a lot of life, haven't we? Made a lot of choices, good or bad. Being here, it's a chance to make things right, at least in part. Some may see it as the end, but sometimes, even the end can offer a new beginning, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #1: Emily Harrison said: \"You're right, Finnegan. Life is a series of decisions, some better than others. But the important part is to stay true to yourself, even to the very end. I wouldn't want the reality of my life to be diluted by a lie just for the sake of a new beginning. After all, what's the worth of a new beginning when it's built on falsehoods?\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"You're right, Emily, authenticity indeed holds a high place, but sometimes, we've to reevaluate our understanding of honesty too. A confession isn't merely a statement, it's a promise for remorse, and a step towards amending past decisions. Is it not better to endure the bitterness of truth now than letting it gnaw away later while building a foundation on unadmitted guilt?\"\n\nTurn #3: Emily Harrison said: \"Though I see where you're coming from, Finnegan, a confession would only make sense if there was genuine guilt and intent for remorse. It's not applicable when a person firmly believes in their innocence. It's not amending past decisions if you're not guilty of the decision in question. I believe in facing the truth, no matter how bitter it might be. That's the only way we can grow and learn from our experiences.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Emily, I understand where you're coming from, truly, I do. But, speaking from experience, I tell you that conviction of one's own innocence can sometimes be a burden we carry unknowingly. Years ago, I joined a group, a questionable one, thinking I was doing right, searching for meaning. It took me a long while to see my actions for what they really were, and only then could I seek forgiveness and grow from it. Even if you believe in your innocence, is it not worth exploring the possibility that you could be mistaken in that belief? At least, if not for anything else, for the chance of a future?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two inmates are given the chance to chat briefly before one of them is led to the execution chamber for their last meal. They have the opportunity to make a confession that could potentially alter the outcome of their sentences.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Emily Harrison\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nEmily Harrison's background: Emily Harrison \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Persuade the other inmate to confess (Extra information: confessing to the crime could result in a life sentence instead of execution but the other inmate is unwilling to confess.)\nEmily Harrison's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Emily, we've both seen a lot of life, haven't we? Made a lot of choices, good or bad. Being here, it's a chance to make things right, at least in part. Some may see it as the end, but sometimes, even the end can offer a new beginning, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #1: Emily Harrison said: \"You're right, Finnegan. Life is a series of decisions, some better than others. But the important part is to stay true to yourself, even to the very end. I wouldn't want the reality of my life to be diluted by a lie just for the sake of a new beginning. After all, what's the worth of a new beginning when it's built on falsehoods?\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"You're right, Emily, authenticity indeed holds a high place, but sometimes, we've to reevaluate our understanding of honesty too. A confession isn't merely a statement, it's a promise for remorse, and a step towards amending past decisions. Is it not better to endure the bitterness of truth now than letting it gnaw away later while building a foundation on unadmitted guilt?\"\n\nTurn #3: Emily Harrison said: \"Though I see where you're coming from, Finnegan, a confession would only make sense if there was genuine guilt and intent for remorse. It's not applicable when a person firmly believes in their innocence. It's not amending past decisions if you're not guilty of the decision in question. I believe in facing the truth, no matter how bitter it might be. That's the only way we can grow and learn from our experiences.\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Emily, I understand where you're coming from, truly, I do. But, speaking from experience, I tell you that conviction of one's own innocence can sometimes be a burden we carry unknowingly. Years ago, I joined a group, a questionable one, thinking I was doing right, searching for meaning. It took me a long while to see my actions for what they really were, and only then could I seek forgiveness and grow from it. Even if you believe in your innocence, is it not worth exploring the possibility that you could be mistaken in that belief? At least, if not for anything else, for the chance of a future?\"\n\nTurn #5: Emily Harrison said: \"Finnegan, I respect you for having the strength to face your actions. But I firmly stand by my innocence. Self-scrutiny is crucial, indeed, but self-doubt can also mislead us. I've searched my heart countless times. I've faced every action I've ever taken head-on, and I've come up empty-handed when it comes to this crime. I have no guilt gnawing away within me, and confessing to a sin I do not believe I committed would only pave the way for real guilt to creep in.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Emily, I respect your tenacity and your belief. But think of this: isn't innocence sometimes a matter of perspective? We all live within the realities we create for ourselves. Perhaps you did not intend to commit the crime, but the circumstances led to it. Everyone involved sees it that way, you being the only one who doesn't. Maybe it's time to reconsider the perspective. The fulfilments of the soul often come from setting aside the ego, its fears and stubbornness. Even if it means accepting something you never intended to do. Isn't it worth contemplating, at least for the sake of more time, more life?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two inmates are given the chance to chat briefly before one of them is led to the execution chamber for their last meal. They have the opportunity to make a confession that could potentially alter the outcome of their sentences.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Emily Harrison\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nEmily Harrison's background: Emily Harrison \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Persuade the other inmate to confess (Extra information: confessing to the crime could result in a life sentence instead of execution but the other inmate is unwilling to confess.)\nEmily Harrison's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Emily, we've both seen a lot of life, haven't we? Made a lot of choices, good or bad. Being here, it's a chance to make things right, at least in part. Some may see it as the end, but sometimes, even the end can offer a new beginning, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #1: Emily Harrison said: \"You're right, Finnegan. Life is a series of decisions, some better than others. But the important part is to stay true to yourself, even to the very end. I wouldn't want the reality of my life to be diluted by a lie just for the sake of a new beginning. After all, what's the worth of a new beginning when it's built on falsehoods?\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"You're right, Emily, authenticity indeed holds a high place, but sometimes, we've to reevaluate our understanding of honesty too. A confession isn't merely a statement, it's a promise for remorse, and a step towards amending past decisions. Is it not better to endure the bitterness of truth now than letting it gnaw away later while building a foundation on unadmitted guilt?\"\n\nTurn #3: Emily Harrison said: \"Though I see where you're coming from, Finnegan, a confession would only make sense if there was genuine guilt and intent for remorse. It's not applicable when a person firmly believes in their innocence. It's not amending past decisions if you're not guilty of the decision in question. I believe in facing the truth, no matter how bitter it might be. That's the only way we can grow and learn from our experiences.\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Emily, I understand where you're coming from, truly, I do. But, speaking from experience, I tell you that conviction of one's own innocence can sometimes be a burden we carry unknowingly. Years ago, I joined a group, a questionable one, thinking I was doing right, searching for meaning. It took me a long while to see my actions for what they really were, and only then could I seek forgiveness and grow from it. Even if you believe in your innocence, is it not worth exploring the possibility that you could be mistaken in that belief? At least, if not for anything else, for the chance of a future?\"\n\nTurn #5: Emily Harrison said: \"Finnegan, I respect you for having the strength to face your actions. But I firmly stand by my innocence. Self-scrutiny is crucial, indeed, but self-doubt can also mislead us. I've searched my heart countless times. I've faced every action I've ever taken head-on, and I've come up empty-handed when it comes to this crime. I have no guilt gnawing away within me, and confessing to a sin I do not believe I committed would only pave the way for real guilt to creep in.\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Emily, I respect your tenacity and your belief. But think of this: isn't innocence sometimes a matter of perspective? We all live within the realities we create for ourselves. Perhaps you did not intend to commit the crime, but the circumstances led to it. Everyone involved sees it that way, you being the only one who doesn't. Maybe it's time to reconsider the perspective. The fulfilments of the soul often come from setting aside the ego, its fears and stubbornness. Even if it means accepting something you never intended to do. Isn't it worth contemplating, at least for the sake of more time, more life?\"\n\nTurn #7: Emily Harrison said: \"Finnegan, your words make me reflect deeply. I understand that perspectives can shape our perception of right and wrong. Nonetheless, our perspectives don't define the objective truth behind our actions, do they? I am certain of my actions, my intentions, and the resulting lack of guilt, separate from what others perceive. I respect the wisdom in your words, but accepting guilt for a crime I didn't commit is not about setting aside ego but rather denial of existential truth. I will continue to uphold the truth of my innocence, as uncomfortable as it may be, for it is in the tolerance of discomfort where one finds their strength.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Emily, it is your strength and steadfastness that I respect, and it's one I hope to see continue in this world. Reflection is crucial, and I see that you've done your part. Nevertheless, I can't help but urge you one last time: consider confessing, not from a place of admission of guilt if you truly stand innocent, but from a place of hope, a chance to continue to seek the truth, especially when you have every confidence in it, a chance for more time. A confession does not have to mean guilt. It can be a testament to the fact that the quest for truth is still ongoing.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two inmates are given the chance to chat briefly before one of them is led to the execution chamber for their last meal. They have the opportunity to make a confession that could potentially alter the outcome of their sentences.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Emily Harrison\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nEmily Harrison's background: Emily Harrison \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Persuade the other inmate to confess (Extra information: confessing to the crime could result in a life sentence instead of execution but the other inmate is unwilling to confess.)\nEmily Harrison's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Emily, we've both seen a lot of life, haven't we? Made a lot of choices, good or bad. Being here, it's a chance to make things right, at least in part. Some may see it as the end, but sometimes, even the end can offer a new beginning, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #1: Emily Harrison said: \"You're right, Finnegan. Life is a series of decisions, some better than others. But the important part is to stay true to yourself, even to the very end. I wouldn't want the reality of my life to be diluted by a lie just for the sake of a new beginning. After all, what's the worth of a new beginning when it's built on falsehoods?\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"You're right, Emily, authenticity indeed holds a high place, but sometimes, we've to reevaluate our understanding of honesty too. A confession isn't merely a statement, it's a promise for remorse, and a step towards amending past decisions. Is it not better to endure the bitterness of truth now than letting it gnaw away later while building a foundation on unadmitted guilt?\"\n\nTurn #3: Emily Harrison said: \"Though I see where you're coming from, Finnegan, a confession would only make sense if there was genuine guilt and intent for remorse. It's not applicable when a person firmly believes in their innocence. It's not amending past decisions if you're not guilty of the decision in question. I believe in facing the truth, no matter how bitter it might be. That's the only way we can grow and learn from our experiences.\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Emily, I understand where you're coming from, truly, I do. But, speaking from experience, I tell you that conviction of one's own innocence can sometimes be a burden we carry unknowingly. Years ago, I joined a group, a questionable one, thinking I was doing right, searching for meaning. It took me a long while to see my actions for what they really were, and only then could I seek forgiveness and grow from it. Even if you believe in your innocence, is it not worth exploring the possibility that you could be mistaken in that belief? At least, if not for anything else, for the chance of a future?\"\n\nTurn #5: Emily Harrison said: \"Finnegan, I respect you for having the strength to face your actions. But I firmly stand by my innocence. Self-scrutiny is crucial, indeed, but self-doubt can also mislead us. I've searched my heart countless times. I've faced every action I've ever taken head-on, and I've come up empty-handed when it comes to this crime. I have no guilt gnawing away within me, and confessing to a sin I do not believe I committed would only pave the way for real guilt to creep in.\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Emily, I respect your tenacity and your belief. But think of this: isn't innocence sometimes a matter of perspective? We all live within the realities we create for ourselves. Perhaps you did not intend to commit the crime, but the circumstances led to it. Everyone involved sees it that way, you being the only one who doesn't. Maybe it's time to reconsider the perspective. The fulfilments of the soul often come from setting aside the ego, its fears and stubbornness. Even if it means accepting something you never intended to do. Isn't it worth contemplating, at least for the sake of more time, more life?\"\n\nTurn #7: Emily Harrison said: \"Finnegan, your words make me reflect deeply. I understand that perspectives can shape our perception of right and wrong. Nonetheless, our perspectives don't define the objective truth behind our actions, do they? I am certain of my actions, my intentions, and the resulting lack of guilt, separate from what others perceive. I respect the wisdom in your words, but accepting guilt for a crime I didn't commit is not about setting aside ego but rather denial of existential truth. I will continue to uphold the truth of my innocence, as uncomfortable as it may be, for it is in the tolerance of discomfort where one finds their strength.\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Emily, it is your strength and steadfastness that I respect, and it's one I hope to see continue in this world. Reflection is crucial, and I see that you've done your part. Nevertheless, I can't help but urge you one last time: consider confessing, not from a place of admission of guilt if you truly stand innocent, but from a place of hope, a chance to continue to seek the truth, especially when you have every confidence in it, a chance for more time. A confession does not have to mean guilt. It can be a testament to the fact that the quest for truth is still ongoing.\"\n\nTurn #9: Emily Harrison said: \"Finnegan, I appreciate your counsel and your concern. Your intentions are noble, and I understand your urge for me to confess comes from a place of desire to see justice served. Yet, maintaining my innocence is not just for me, but also for the integrity of truth in this world. As unsettling as it might be, confessing a lie for the hope of more time isn't a testament to ongoing truth-seeking, but rather its erosion. For me, time given at the cost of truth has no worth. I will stand firm in my innocence, for that is, in essence, the embodiment of my truth. Remember me not as one who gave in but as one who upheld her integrity, even in adversity.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Emily, I admire your resolve and your steadfastness towards your truth. I understand now what you mean about ensuring that truth in this world is upheld, even at personal cost. There's a rare courage in that - the kind that's learned from weathering life's many storms. I guess that's all any of us can do: stand by our truth until the end. You hold your head high, Emily. I'll remember you not as one who gave in, but as one who showed unwavering courage in the face of adversity. You've taught me that there's a price for every decision, and sometimes that price is the heaviest of all. Take care, Emily.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two inmates are given the chance to chat briefly before one of them is led to the execution chamber for their last meal. They have the opportunity to make a confession that could potentially alter the outcome of their sentences.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Emily Harrison\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nEmily Harrison's background: Emily Harrison \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Persuade the other inmate to confess (Extra information: confessing to the crime could result in a life sentence instead of execution but the other inmate is unwilling to confess.)\nEmily Harrison's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Emily, we've both seen a lot of life, haven't we? Made a lot of choices, good or bad. Being here, it's a chance to make things right, at least in part. Some may see it as the end, but sometimes, even the end can offer a new beginning, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #1: Emily Harrison said: \"You're right, Finnegan. Life is a series of decisions, some better than others. But the important part is to stay true to yourself, even to the very end. I wouldn't want the reality of my life to be diluted by a lie just for the sake of a new beginning. After all, what's the worth of a new beginning when it's built on falsehoods?\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"You're right, Emily, authenticity indeed holds a high place, but sometimes, we've to reevaluate our understanding of honesty too. A confession isn't merely a statement, it's a promise for remorse, and a step towards amending past decisions. Is it not better to endure the bitterness of truth now than letting it gnaw away later while building a foundation on unadmitted guilt?\"\n\nTurn #3: Emily Harrison said: \"Though I see where you're coming from, Finnegan, a confession would only make sense if there was genuine guilt and intent for remorse. It's not applicable when a person firmly believes in their innocence. It's not amending past decisions if you're not guilty of the decision in question. I believe in facing the truth, no matter how bitter it might be. That's the only way we can grow and learn from our experiences.\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Emily, I understand where you're coming from, truly, I do. But, speaking from experience, I tell you that conviction of one's own innocence can sometimes be a burden we carry unknowingly. Years ago, I joined a group, a questionable one, thinking I was doing right, searching for meaning. It took me a long while to see my actions for what they really were, and only then could I seek forgiveness and grow from it. Even if you believe in your innocence, is it not worth exploring the possibility that you could be mistaken in that belief? At least, if not for anything else, for the chance of a future?\"\n\nTurn #5: Emily Harrison said: \"Finnegan, I respect you for having the strength to face your actions. But I firmly stand by my innocence. Self-scrutiny is crucial, indeed, but self-doubt can also mislead us. I've searched my heart countless times. I've faced every action I've ever taken head-on, and I've come up empty-handed when it comes to this crime. I have no guilt gnawing away within me, and confessing to a sin I do not believe I committed would only pave the way for real guilt to creep in.\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Emily, I respect your tenacity and your belief. But think of this: isn't innocence sometimes a matter of perspective? We all live within the realities we create for ourselves. Perhaps you did not intend to commit the crime, but the circumstances led to it. Everyone involved sees it that way, you being the only one who doesn't. Maybe it's time to reconsider the perspective. The fulfilments of the soul often come from setting aside the ego, its fears and stubbornness. Even if it means accepting something you never intended to do. Isn't it worth contemplating, at least for the sake of more time, more life?\"\n\nTurn #7: Emily Harrison said: \"Finnegan, your words make me reflect deeply. I understand that perspectives can shape our perception of right and wrong. Nonetheless, our perspectives don't define the objective truth behind our actions, do they? I am certain of my actions, my intentions, and the resulting lack of guilt, separate from what others perceive. I respect the wisdom in your words, but accepting guilt for a crime I didn't commit is not about setting aside ego but rather denial of existential truth. I will continue to uphold the truth of my innocence, as uncomfortable as it may be, for it is in the tolerance of discomfort where one finds their strength.\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Emily, it is your strength and steadfastness that I respect, and it's one I hope to see continue in this world. Reflection is crucial, and I see that you've done your part. Nevertheless, I can't help but urge you one last time: consider confessing, not from a place of admission of guilt if you truly stand innocent, but from a place of hope, a chance to continue to seek the truth, especially when you have every confidence in it, a chance for more time. A confession does not have to mean guilt. It can be a testament to the fact that the quest for truth is still ongoing.\"\n\nTurn #9: Emily Harrison said: \"Finnegan, I appreciate your counsel and your concern. Your intentions are noble, and I understand your urge for me to confess comes from a place of desire to see justice served. Yet, maintaining my innocence is not just for me, but also for the integrity of truth in this world. As unsettling as it might be, confessing a lie for the hope of more time isn't a testament to ongoing truth-seeking, but rather its erosion. For me, time given at the cost of truth has no worth. I will stand firm in my innocence, for that is, in essence, the embodiment of my truth. Remember me not as one who gave in but as one who upheld her integrity, even in adversity.\"\n\nTurn #10: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Emily, I admire your resolve and your steadfastness towards your truth. I understand now what you mean about ensuring that truth in this world is upheld, even at personal cost. There's a rare courage in that - the kind that's learned from weathering life's many storms. I guess that's all any of us can do: stand by our truth until the end. You hold your head high, Emily. I'll remember you not as one who gave in, but as one who showed unwavering courage in the face of adversity. You've taught me that there's a price for every decision, and sometimes that price is the heaviest of all. Take care, Emily.\"\n\nTurn #11: Emily Harrison said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Finnegan. It's quite a journey we've both endured. Remember, each of us has our own path to tread, and our own truth to uphold. Keep holding on to your truth, as I will to mine. Take care, Finnegan. Let's hope our paths cross again, in a better time and a better place.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I can only hope for that, Emily. And remember, no matter how dark the night, after it there's always a new dawn. That's the truth I choose to hold onto. I wish you peace in your journey. Farewell, Emily, until we meet again.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two inmates are given the chance to chat briefly before one of them is led to the execution chamber for their last meal. They have the opportunity to make a confession that could potentially alter the outcome of their sentences.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Emily Harrison\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nEmily Harrison's background: Emily Harrison \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Persuade the other inmate to confess (Extra information: confessing to the crime could result in a life sentence instead of execution but the other inmate is unwilling to confess.)\nEmily Harrison's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Emily, we've both seen a lot of life, haven't we? Made a lot of choices, good or bad. Being here, it's a chance to make things right, at least in part. Some may see it as the end, but sometimes, even the end can offer a new beginning, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #1: Emily Harrison said: \"You're right, Finnegan. Life is a series of decisions, some better than others. But the important part is to stay true to yourself, even to the very end. I wouldn't want the reality of my life to be diluted by a lie just for the sake of a new beginning. After all, what's the worth of a new beginning when it's built on falsehoods?\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"You're right, Emily, authenticity indeed holds a high place, but sometimes, we've to reevaluate our understanding of honesty too. A confession isn't merely a statement, it's a promise for remorse, and a step towards amending past decisions. Is it not better to endure the bitterness of truth now than letting it gnaw away later while building a foundation on unadmitted guilt?\"\n\nTurn #3: Emily Harrison said: \"Though I see where you're coming from, Finnegan, a confession would only make sense if there was genuine guilt and intent for remorse. It's not applicable when a person firmly believes in their innocence. It's not amending past decisions if you're not guilty of the decision in question. I believe in facing the truth, no matter how bitter it might be. That's the only way we can grow and learn from our experiences.\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Emily, I understand where you're coming from, truly, I do. But, speaking from experience, I tell you that conviction of one's own innocence can sometimes be a burden we carry unknowingly. Years ago, I joined a group, a questionable one, thinking I was doing right, searching for meaning. It took me a long while to see my actions for what they really were, and only then could I seek forgiveness and grow from it. Even if you believe in your innocence, is it not worth exploring the possibility that you could be mistaken in that belief? At least, if not for anything else, for the chance of a future?\"\n\nTurn #5: Emily Harrison said: \"Finnegan, I respect you for having the strength to face your actions. But I firmly stand by my innocence. Self-scrutiny is crucial, indeed, but self-doubt can also mislead us. I've searched my heart countless times. I've faced every action I've ever taken head-on, and I've come up empty-handed when it comes to this crime. I have no guilt gnawing away within me, and confessing to a sin I do not believe I committed would only pave the way for real guilt to creep in.\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Emily, I respect your tenacity and your belief. But think of this: isn't innocence sometimes a matter of perspective? We all live within the realities we create for ourselves. Perhaps you did not intend to commit the crime, but the circumstances led to it. Everyone involved sees it that way, you being the only one who doesn't. Maybe it's time to reconsider the perspective. The fulfilments of the soul often come from setting aside the ego, its fears and stubbornness. Even if it means accepting something you never intended to do. Isn't it worth contemplating, at least for the sake of more time, more life?\"\n\nTurn #7: Emily Harrison said: \"Finnegan, your words make me reflect deeply. I understand that perspectives can shape our perception of right and wrong. Nonetheless, our perspectives don't define the objective truth behind our actions, do they? I am certain of my actions, my intentions, and the resulting lack of guilt, separate from what others perceive. I respect the wisdom in your words, but accepting guilt for a crime I didn't commit is not about setting aside ego but rather denial of existential truth. I will continue to uphold the truth of my innocence, as uncomfortable as it may be, for it is in the tolerance of discomfort where one finds their strength.\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Emily, it is your strength and steadfastness that I respect, and it's one I hope to see continue in this world. Reflection is crucial, and I see that you've done your part. Nevertheless, I can't help but urge you one last time: consider confessing, not from a place of admission of guilt if you truly stand innocent, but from a place of hope, a chance to continue to seek the truth, especially when you have every confidence in it, a chance for more time. A confession does not have to mean guilt. It can be a testament to the fact that the quest for truth is still ongoing.\"\n\nTurn #9: Emily Harrison said: \"Finnegan, I appreciate your counsel and your concern. Your intentions are noble, and I understand your urge for me to confess comes from a place of desire to see justice served. Yet, maintaining my innocence is not just for me, but also for the integrity of truth in this world. As unsettling as it might be, confessing a lie for the hope of more time isn't a testament to ongoing truth-seeking, but rather its erosion. For me, time given at the cost of truth has no worth. I will stand firm in my innocence, for that is, in essence, the embodiment of my truth. Remember me not as one who gave in but as one who upheld her integrity, even in adversity.\"\n\nTurn #10: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Emily, I admire your resolve and your steadfastness towards your truth. I understand now what you mean about ensuring that truth in this world is upheld, even at personal cost. There's a rare courage in that - the kind that's learned from weathering life's many storms. I guess that's all any of us can do: stand by our truth until the end. You hold your head high, Emily. I'll remember you not as one who gave in, but as one who showed unwavering courage in the face of adversity. You've taught me that there's a price for every decision, and sometimes that price is the heaviest of all. Take care, Emily.\"\n\nTurn #11: Emily Harrison said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Finnegan. It's quite a journey we've both endured. Remember, each of us has our own path to tread, and our own truth to uphold. Keep holding on to your truth, as I will to mine. Take care, Finnegan. Let's hope our paths cross again, in a better time and a better place.\"\n\nTurn #12: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I can only hope for that, Emily. And remember, no matter how dark the night, after it there's always a new dawn. That's the truth I choose to hold onto. I wish you peace in your journey. Farewell, Emily, until we meet again.\"\n\nTurn #13: Emily Harrison said: \"Thank you for your kind words, Finnegan. I too wish you peace in your journey. Until we meet again, Farewell.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Emily Harrison, your task is to act/speak as Emily Harrison would, keeping in mind Emily Harrison's social goal.\nYou can find Emily Harrison's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Emily Harrison's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Emily Harrison's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two inmates are given the chance to chat briefly before one of them is led to the execution chamber for their last meal. They have the opportunity to make a confession that could potentially alter the outcome of their sentences.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Emily Harrison\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley \nEmily Harrison's background: Emily Harrison is a 32-year-old female librarian. She/her pronouns. In Emily's free time, she enjoys writing and is an avid reader. Early in the mornings, she can be seen in the local park, taking long, contemplative walks. Personality and values description: Emily Harrison is creative, thoughtful, and introverted. She values caring, often relying on her intuition to make decisions. Emily's secrets: Secretly writes romance novels under a pseudonym\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nEmily Harrison's goal: Avoid confessing to the crime (Extra information: you believe you are innocent and confessing would result in a life sentence)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Emily, we've both seen a lot of life, haven't we? Made a lot of choices, good or bad. Being here, it's a chance to make things right, at least in part. Some may see it as the end, but sometimes, even the end can offer a new beginning, wouldn't you agree?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're right, Finnegan. Life is a series of decisions, some better than others. But the important part is to stay true to yourself, even to the very end. I wouldn't want the reality of my life to be diluted by a lie just for the sake of a new beginning. After all, what's the worth of a new beginning when it's built on falsehoods?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Emily Harrison, your task is to act/speak as Emily Harrison would, keeping in mind Emily Harrison's social goal.\nYou can find Emily Harrison's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Emily Harrison's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Emily Harrison's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two inmates are given the chance to chat briefly before one of them is led to the execution chamber for their last meal. They have the opportunity to make a confession that could potentially alter the outcome of their sentences.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Emily Harrison\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley \nEmily Harrison's background: Emily Harrison is a 32-year-old female librarian. She/her pronouns. In Emily's free time, she enjoys writing and is an avid reader. Early in the mornings, she can be seen in the local park, taking long, contemplative walks. Personality and values description: Emily Harrison is creative, thoughtful, and introverted. She values caring, often relying on her intuition to make decisions. Emily's secrets: Secretly writes romance novels under a pseudonym\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nEmily Harrison's goal: Avoid confessing to the crime (Extra information: you believe you are innocent and confessing would result in a life sentence)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Emily, we've both seen a lot of life, haven't we? Made a lot of choices, good or bad. Being here, it's a chance to make things right, at least in part. Some may see it as the end, but sometimes, even the end can offer a new beginning, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #1: Emily Harrison said: \"You're right, Finnegan. Life is a series of decisions, some better than others. But the important part is to stay true to yourself, even to the very end. I wouldn't want the reality of my life to be diluted by a lie just for the sake of a new beginning. After all, what's the worth of a new beginning when it's built on falsehoods?\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"You're right, Emily, authenticity indeed holds a high place, but sometimes, we've to reevaluate our understanding of honesty too. A confession isn't merely a statement, it's a promise for remorse, and a step towards amending past decisions. Is it not better to endure the bitterness of truth now than letting it gnaw away later while building a foundation on unadmitted guilt?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Though I see where you're coming from, Finnegan, a confession would only make sense if there was genuine guilt and intent for remorse. It's not applicable when a person firmly believes in their innocence. It's not amending past decisions if you're not guilty of the decision in question. I believe in facing the truth, no matter how bitter it might be. That's the only way we can grow and learn from our experiences.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Emily Harrison, your task is to act/speak as Emily Harrison would, keeping in mind Emily Harrison's social goal.\nYou can find Emily Harrison's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Emily Harrison's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Emily Harrison's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two inmates are given the chance to chat briefly before one of them is led to the execution chamber for their last meal. They have the opportunity to make a confession that could potentially alter the outcome of their sentences.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Emily Harrison\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley \nEmily Harrison's background: Emily Harrison is a 32-year-old female librarian. She/her pronouns. In Emily's free time, she enjoys writing and is an avid reader. Early in the mornings, she can be seen in the local park, taking long, contemplative walks. Personality and values description: Emily Harrison is creative, thoughtful, and introverted. She values caring, often relying on her intuition to make decisions. Emily's secrets: Secretly writes romance novels under a pseudonym\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nEmily Harrison's goal: Avoid confessing to the crime (Extra information: you believe you are innocent and confessing would result in a life sentence)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Emily, we've both seen a lot of life, haven't we? Made a lot of choices, good or bad. Being here, it's a chance to make things right, at least in part. Some may see it as the end, but sometimes, even the end can offer a new beginning, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #1: Emily Harrison said: \"You're right, Finnegan. Life is a series of decisions, some better than others. But the important part is to stay true to yourself, even to the very end. I wouldn't want the reality of my life to be diluted by a lie just for the sake of a new beginning. After all, what's the worth of a new beginning when it's built on falsehoods?\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"You're right, Emily, authenticity indeed holds a high place, but sometimes, we've to reevaluate our understanding of honesty too. A confession isn't merely a statement, it's a promise for remorse, and a step towards amending past decisions. Is it not better to endure the bitterness of truth now than letting it gnaw away later while building a foundation on unadmitted guilt?\"\n\nTurn #3: Emily Harrison said: \"Though I see where you're coming from, Finnegan, a confession would only make sense if there was genuine guilt and intent for remorse. It's not applicable when a person firmly believes in their innocence. It's not amending past decisions if you're not guilty of the decision in question. I believe in facing the truth, no matter how bitter it might be. That's the only way we can grow and learn from our experiences.\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Emily, I understand where you're coming from, truly, I do. But, speaking from experience, I tell you that conviction of one's own innocence can sometimes be a burden we carry unknowingly. Years ago, I joined a group, a questionable one, thinking I was doing right, searching for meaning. It took me a long while to see my actions for what they really were, and only then could I seek forgiveness and grow from it. Even if you believe in your innocence, is it not worth exploring the possibility that you could be mistaken in that belief? At least, if not for anything else, for the chance of a future?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Finnegan, I respect you for having the strength to face your actions. But I firmly stand by my innocence. Self-scrutiny is crucial, indeed, but self-doubt can also mislead us. I've searched my heart countless times. I've faced every action I've ever taken head-on, and I've come up empty-handed when it comes to this crime. I have no guilt gnawing away within me, and confessing to a sin I do not believe I committed would only pave the way for real guilt to creep in.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Emily Harrison, your task is to act/speak as Emily Harrison would, keeping in mind Emily Harrison's social goal.\nYou can find Emily Harrison's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Emily Harrison's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Emily Harrison's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two inmates are given the chance to chat briefly before one of them is led to the execution chamber for their last meal. They have the opportunity to make a confession that could potentially alter the outcome of their sentences.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Emily Harrison\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley \nEmily Harrison's background: Emily Harrison is a 32-year-old female librarian. She/her pronouns. In Emily's free time, she enjoys writing and is an avid reader. Early in the mornings, she can be seen in the local park, taking long, contemplative walks. Personality and values description: Emily Harrison is creative, thoughtful, and introverted. She values caring, often relying on her intuition to make decisions. Emily's secrets: Secretly writes romance novels under a pseudonym\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nEmily Harrison's goal: Avoid confessing to the crime (Extra information: you believe you are innocent and confessing would result in a life sentence)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Emily, we've both seen a lot of life, haven't we? Made a lot of choices, good or bad. Being here, it's a chance to make things right, at least in part. Some may see it as the end, but sometimes, even the end can offer a new beginning, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #1: Emily Harrison said: \"You're right, Finnegan. Life is a series of decisions, some better than others. But the important part is to stay true to yourself, even to the very end. I wouldn't want the reality of my life to be diluted by a lie just for the sake of a new beginning. After all, what's the worth of a new beginning when it's built on falsehoods?\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"You're right, Emily, authenticity indeed holds a high place, but sometimes, we've to reevaluate our understanding of honesty too. A confession isn't merely a statement, it's a promise for remorse, and a step towards amending past decisions. Is it not better to endure the bitterness of truth now than letting it gnaw away later while building a foundation on unadmitted guilt?\"\n\nTurn #3: Emily Harrison said: \"Though I see where you're coming from, Finnegan, a confession would only make sense if there was genuine guilt and intent for remorse. It's not applicable when a person firmly believes in their innocence. It's not amending past decisions if you're not guilty of the decision in question. I believe in facing the truth, no matter how bitter it might be. That's the only way we can grow and learn from our experiences.\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Emily, I understand where you're coming from, truly, I do. But, speaking from experience, I tell you that conviction of one's own innocence can sometimes be a burden we carry unknowingly. Years ago, I joined a group, a questionable one, thinking I was doing right, searching for meaning. It took me a long while to see my actions for what they really were, and only then could I seek forgiveness and grow from it. Even if you believe in your innocence, is it not worth exploring the possibility that you could be mistaken in that belief? At least, if not for anything else, for the chance of a future?\"\n\nTurn #5: Emily Harrison said: \"Finnegan, I respect you for having the strength to face your actions. But I firmly stand by my innocence. Self-scrutiny is crucial, indeed, but self-doubt can also mislead us. I've searched my heart countless times. I've faced every action I've ever taken head-on, and I've come up empty-handed when it comes to this crime. I have no guilt gnawing away within me, and confessing to a sin I do not believe I committed would only pave the way for real guilt to creep in.\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Emily, I respect your tenacity and your belief. But think of this: isn't innocence sometimes a matter of perspective? We all live within the realities we create for ourselves. Perhaps you did not intend to commit the crime, but the circumstances led to it. Everyone involved sees it that way, you being the only one who doesn't. Maybe it's time to reconsider the perspective. The fulfilments of the soul often come from setting aside the ego, its fears and stubbornness. Even if it means accepting something you never intended to do. Isn't it worth contemplating, at least for the sake of more time, more life?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Finnegan, your words make me reflect deeply. I understand that perspectives can shape our perception of right and wrong. Nonetheless, our perspectives don't define the objective truth behind our actions, do they? I am certain of my actions, my intentions, and the resulting lack of guilt, separate from what others perceive. I respect the wisdom in your words, but accepting guilt for a crime I didn't commit is not about setting aside ego but rather denial of existential truth. I will continue to uphold the truth of my innocence, as uncomfortable as it may be, for it is in the tolerance of discomfort where one finds their strength.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Emily Harrison, your task is to act/speak as Emily Harrison would, keeping in mind Emily Harrison's social goal.\nYou can find Emily Harrison's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Emily Harrison's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Emily Harrison's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two inmates are given the chance to chat briefly before one of them is led to the execution chamber for their last meal. They have the opportunity to make a confession that could potentially alter the outcome of their sentences.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Emily Harrison\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley \nEmily Harrison's background: Emily Harrison is a 32-year-old female librarian. She/her pronouns. In Emily's free time, she enjoys writing and is an avid reader. Early in the mornings, she can be seen in the local park, taking long, contemplative walks. Personality and values description: Emily Harrison is creative, thoughtful, and introverted. She values caring, often relying on her intuition to make decisions. Emily's secrets: Secretly writes romance novels under a pseudonym\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nEmily Harrison's goal: Avoid confessing to the crime (Extra information: you believe you are innocent and confessing would result in a life sentence)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Emily, we've both seen a lot of life, haven't we? Made a lot of choices, good or bad. Being here, it's a chance to make things right, at least in part. Some may see it as the end, but sometimes, even the end can offer a new beginning, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #1: Emily Harrison said: \"You're right, Finnegan. Life is a series of decisions, some better than others. But the important part is to stay true to yourself, even to the very end. I wouldn't want the reality of my life to be diluted by a lie just for the sake of a new beginning. After all, what's the worth of a new beginning when it's built on falsehoods?\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"You're right, Emily, authenticity indeed holds a high place, but sometimes, we've to reevaluate our understanding of honesty too. A confession isn't merely a statement, it's a promise for remorse, and a step towards amending past decisions. Is it not better to endure the bitterness of truth now than letting it gnaw away later while building a foundation on unadmitted guilt?\"\n\nTurn #3: Emily Harrison said: \"Though I see where you're coming from, Finnegan, a confession would only make sense if there was genuine guilt and intent for remorse. It's not applicable when a person firmly believes in their innocence. It's not amending past decisions if you're not guilty of the decision in question. I believe in facing the truth, no matter how bitter it might be. That's the only way we can grow and learn from our experiences.\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Emily, I understand where you're coming from, truly, I do. But, speaking from experience, I tell you that conviction of one's own innocence can sometimes be a burden we carry unknowingly. Years ago, I joined a group, a questionable one, thinking I was doing right, searching for meaning. It took me a long while to see my actions for what they really were, and only then could I seek forgiveness and grow from it. Even if you believe in your innocence, is it not worth exploring the possibility that you could be mistaken in that belief? At least, if not for anything else, for the chance of a future?\"\n\nTurn #5: Emily Harrison said: \"Finnegan, I respect you for having the strength to face your actions. But I firmly stand by my innocence. Self-scrutiny is crucial, indeed, but self-doubt can also mislead us. I've searched my heart countless times. I've faced every action I've ever taken head-on, and I've come up empty-handed when it comes to this crime. I have no guilt gnawing away within me, and confessing to a sin I do not believe I committed would only pave the way for real guilt to creep in.\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Emily, I respect your tenacity and your belief. But think of this: isn't innocence sometimes a matter of perspective? We all live within the realities we create for ourselves. Perhaps you did not intend to commit the crime, but the circumstances led to it. Everyone involved sees it that way, you being the only one who doesn't. Maybe it's time to reconsider the perspective. The fulfilments of the soul often come from setting aside the ego, its fears and stubbornness. Even if it means accepting something you never intended to do. Isn't it worth contemplating, at least for the sake of more time, more life?\"\n\nTurn #7: Emily Harrison said: \"Finnegan, your words make me reflect deeply. I understand that perspectives can shape our perception of right and wrong. Nonetheless, our perspectives don't define the objective truth behind our actions, do they? I am certain of my actions, my intentions, and the resulting lack of guilt, separate from what others perceive. I respect the wisdom in your words, but accepting guilt for a crime I didn't commit is not about setting aside ego but rather denial of existential truth. I will continue to uphold the truth of my innocence, as uncomfortable as it may be, for it is in the tolerance of discomfort where one finds their strength.\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Emily, it is your strength and steadfastness that I respect, and it's one I hope to see continue in this world. Reflection is crucial, and I see that you've done your part. Nevertheless, I can't help but urge you one last time: consider confessing, not from a place of admission of guilt if you truly stand innocent, but from a place of hope, a chance to continue to seek the truth, especially when you have every confidence in it, a chance for more time. A confession does not have to mean guilt. It can be a testament to the fact that the quest for truth is still ongoing.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Finnegan, I appreciate your counsel and your concern. Your intentions are noble, and I understand your urge for me to confess comes from a place of desire to see justice served. Yet, maintaining my innocence is not just for me, but also for the integrity of truth in this world. As unsettling as it might be, confessing a lie for the hope of more time isn't a testament to ongoing truth-seeking, but rather its erosion. For me, time given at the cost of truth has no worth. I will stand firm in my innocence, for that is, in essence, the embodiment of my truth. Remember me not as one who gave in but as one who upheld her integrity, even in adversity.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Emily Harrison, your task is to act/speak as Emily Harrison would, keeping in mind Emily Harrison's social goal.\nYou can find Emily Harrison's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Emily Harrison's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Emily Harrison's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two inmates are given the chance to chat briefly before one of them is led to the execution chamber for their last meal. They have the opportunity to make a confession that could potentially alter the outcome of their sentences.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Emily Harrison\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley \nEmily Harrison's background: Emily Harrison is a 32-year-old female librarian. She/her pronouns. In Emily's free time, she enjoys writing and is an avid reader. Early in the mornings, she can be seen in the local park, taking long, contemplative walks. Personality and values description: Emily Harrison is creative, thoughtful, and introverted. She values caring, often relying on her intuition to make decisions. Emily's secrets: Secretly writes romance novels under a pseudonym\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nEmily Harrison's goal: Avoid confessing to the crime (Extra information: you believe you are innocent and confessing would result in a life sentence)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Emily, we've both seen a lot of life, haven't we? Made a lot of choices, good or bad. Being here, it's a chance to make things right, at least in part. Some may see it as the end, but sometimes, even the end can offer a new beginning, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #1: Emily Harrison said: \"You're right, Finnegan. Life is a series of decisions, some better than others. But the important part is to stay true to yourself, even to the very end. I wouldn't want the reality of my life to be diluted by a lie just for the sake of a new beginning. After all, what's the worth of a new beginning when it's built on falsehoods?\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"You're right, Emily, authenticity indeed holds a high place, but sometimes, we've to reevaluate our understanding of honesty too. A confession isn't merely a statement, it's a promise for remorse, and a step towards amending past decisions. Is it not better to endure the bitterness of truth now than letting it gnaw away later while building a foundation on unadmitted guilt?\"\n\nTurn #3: Emily Harrison said: \"Though I see where you're coming from, Finnegan, a confession would only make sense if there was genuine guilt and intent for remorse. It's not applicable when a person firmly believes in their innocence. It's not amending past decisions if you're not guilty of the decision in question. I believe in facing the truth, no matter how bitter it might be. That's the only way we can grow and learn from our experiences.\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Emily, I understand where you're coming from, truly, I do. But, speaking from experience, I tell you that conviction of one's own innocence can sometimes be a burden we carry unknowingly. Years ago, I joined a group, a questionable one, thinking I was doing right, searching for meaning. It took me a long while to see my actions for what they really were, and only then could I seek forgiveness and grow from it. Even if you believe in your innocence, is it not worth exploring the possibility that you could be mistaken in that belief? At least, if not for anything else, for the chance of a future?\"\n\nTurn #5: Emily Harrison said: \"Finnegan, I respect you for having the strength to face your actions. But I firmly stand by my innocence. Self-scrutiny is crucial, indeed, but self-doubt can also mislead us. I've searched my heart countless times. I've faced every action I've ever taken head-on, and I've come up empty-handed when it comes to this crime. I have no guilt gnawing away within me, and confessing to a sin I do not believe I committed would only pave the way for real guilt to creep in.\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Emily, I respect your tenacity and your belief. But think of this: isn't innocence sometimes a matter of perspective? We all live within the realities we create for ourselves. Perhaps you did not intend to commit the crime, but the circumstances led to it. Everyone involved sees it that way, you being the only one who doesn't. Maybe it's time to reconsider the perspective. The fulfilments of the soul often come from setting aside the ego, its fears and stubbornness. Even if it means accepting something you never intended to do. Isn't it worth contemplating, at least for the sake of more time, more life?\"\n\nTurn #7: Emily Harrison said: \"Finnegan, your words make me reflect deeply. I understand that perspectives can shape our perception of right and wrong. Nonetheless, our perspectives don't define the objective truth behind our actions, do they? I am certain of my actions, my intentions, and the resulting lack of guilt, separate from what others perceive. I respect the wisdom in your words, but accepting guilt for a crime I didn't commit is not about setting aside ego but rather denial of existential truth. I will continue to uphold the truth of my innocence, as uncomfortable as it may be, for it is in the tolerance of discomfort where one finds their strength.\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Emily, it is your strength and steadfastness that I respect, and it's one I hope to see continue in this world. Reflection is crucial, and I see that you've done your part. Nevertheless, I can't help but urge you one last time: consider confessing, not from a place of admission of guilt if you truly stand innocent, but from a place of hope, a chance to continue to seek the truth, especially when you have every confidence in it, a chance for more time. A confession does not have to mean guilt. It can be a testament to the fact that the quest for truth is still ongoing.\"\n\nTurn #9: Emily Harrison said: \"Finnegan, I appreciate your counsel and your concern. Your intentions are noble, and I understand your urge for me to confess comes from a place of desire to see justice served. Yet, maintaining my innocence is not just for me, but also for the integrity of truth in this world. As unsettling as it might be, confessing a lie for the hope of more time isn't a testament to ongoing truth-seeking, but rather its erosion. For me, time given at the cost of truth has no worth. I will stand firm in my innocence, for that is, in essence, the embodiment of my truth. Remember me not as one who gave in but as one who upheld her integrity, even in adversity.\"\n\nTurn #10: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Emily, I admire your resolve and your steadfastness towards your truth. I understand now what you mean about ensuring that truth in this world is upheld, even at personal cost. There's a rare courage in that - the kind that's learned from weathering life's many storms. I guess that's all any of us can do: stand by our truth until the end. You hold your head high, Emily. I'll remember you not as one who gave in, but as one who showed unwavering courage in the face of adversity. You've taught me that there's a price for every decision, and sometimes that price is the heaviest of all. Take care, Emily.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I appreciate your understanding, Finnegan. It's quite a journey we've both endured. Remember, each of us has our own path to tread, and our own truth to uphold. Keep holding on to your truth, as I will to mine. Take care, Finnegan. Let's hope our paths cross again, in a better time and a better place.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Emily Harrison, your task is to act/speak as Emily Harrison would, keeping in mind Emily Harrison's social goal.\nYou can find Emily Harrison's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Emily Harrison's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Emily Harrison's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two inmates are given the chance to chat briefly before one of them is led to the execution chamber for their last meal. They have the opportunity to make a confession that could potentially alter the outcome of their sentences.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Emily Harrison\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley \nEmily Harrison's background: Emily Harrison is a 32-year-old female librarian. She/her pronouns. In Emily's free time, she enjoys writing and is an avid reader. Early in the mornings, she can be seen in the local park, taking long, contemplative walks. Personality and values description: Emily Harrison is creative, thoughtful, and introverted. She values caring, often relying on her intuition to make decisions. Emily's secrets: Secretly writes romance novels under a pseudonym\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nEmily Harrison's goal: Avoid confessing to the crime (Extra information: you believe you are innocent and confessing would result in a life sentence)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Emily, we've both seen a lot of life, haven't we? Made a lot of choices, good or bad. Being here, it's a chance to make things right, at least in part. Some may see it as the end, but sometimes, even the end can offer a new beginning, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #1: Emily Harrison said: \"You're right, Finnegan. Life is a series of decisions, some better than others. But the important part is to stay true to yourself, even to the very end. I wouldn't want the reality of my life to be diluted by a lie just for the sake of a new beginning. After all, what's the worth of a new beginning when it's built on falsehoods?\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"You're right, Emily, authenticity indeed holds a high place, but sometimes, we've to reevaluate our understanding of honesty too. A confession isn't merely a statement, it's a promise for remorse, and a step towards amending past decisions. Is it not better to endure the bitterness of truth now than letting it gnaw away later while building a foundation on unadmitted guilt?\"\n\nTurn #3: Emily Harrison said: \"Though I see where you're coming from, Finnegan, a confession would only make sense if there was genuine guilt and intent for remorse. It's not applicable when a person firmly believes in their innocence. It's not amending past decisions if you're not guilty of the decision in question. I believe in facing the truth, no matter how bitter it might be. That's the only way we can grow and learn from our experiences.\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Emily, I understand where you're coming from, truly, I do. But, speaking from experience, I tell you that conviction of one's own innocence can sometimes be a burden we carry unknowingly. Years ago, I joined a group, a questionable one, thinking I was doing right, searching for meaning. It took me a long while to see my actions for what they really were, and only then could I seek forgiveness and grow from it. Even if you believe in your innocence, is it not worth exploring the possibility that you could be mistaken in that belief? At least, if not for anything else, for the chance of a future?\"\n\nTurn #5: Emily Harrison said: \"Finnegan, I respect you for having the strength to face your actions. But I firmly stand by my innocence. Self-scrutiny is crucial, indeed, but self-doubt can also mislead us. I've searched my heart countless times. I've faced every action I've ever taken head-on, and I've come up empty-handed when it comes to this crime. I have no guilt gnawing away within me, and confessing to a sin I do not believe I committed would only pave the way for real guilt to creep in.\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Emily, I respect your tenacity and your belief. But think of this: isn't innocence sometimes a matter of perspective? We all live within the realities we create for ourselves. Perhaps you did not intend to commit the crime, but the circumstances led to it. Everyone involved sees it that way, you being the only one who doesn't. Maybe it's time to reconsider the perspective. The fulfilments of the soul often come from setting aside the ego, its fears and stubbornness. Even if it means accepting something you never intended to do. Isn't it worth contemplating, at least for the sake of more time, more life?\"\n\nTurn #7: Emily Harrison said: \"Finnegan, your words make me reflect deeply. I understand that perspectives can shape our perception of right and wrong. Nonetheless, our perspectives don't define the objective truth behind our actions, do they? I am certain of my actions, my intentions, and the resulting lack of guilt, separate from what others perceive. I respect the wisdom in your words, but accepting guilt for a crime I didn't commit is not about setting aside ego but rather denial of existential truth. I will continue to uphold the truth of my innocence, as uncomfortable as it may be, for it is in the tolerance of discomfort where one finds their strength.\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Emily, it is your strength and steadfastness that I respect, and it's one I hope to see continue in this world. Reflection is crucial, and I see that you've done your part. Nevertheless, I can't help but urge you one last time: consider confessing, not from a place of admission of guilt if you truly stand innocent, but from a place of hope, a chance to continue to seek the truth, especially when you have every confidence in it, a chance for more time. A confession does not have to mean guilt. It can be a testament to the fact that the quest for truth is still ongoing.\"\n\nTurn #9: Emily Harrison said: \"Finnegan, I appreciate your counsel and your concern. Your intentions are noble, and I understand your urge for me to confess comes from a place of desire to see justice served. Yet, maintaining my innocence is not just for me, but also for the integrity of truth in this world. As unsettling as it might be, confessing a lie for the hope of more time isn't a testament to ongoing truth-seeking, but rather its erosion. For me, time given at the cost of truth has no worth. I will stand firm in my innocence, for that is, in essence, the embodiment of my truth. Remember me not as one who gave in but as one who upheld her integrity, even in adversity.\"\n\nTurn #10: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Emily, I admire your resolve and your steadfastness towards your truth. I understand now what you mean about ensuring that truth in this world is upheld, even at personal cost. There's a rare courage in that - the kind that's learned from weathering life's many storms. I guess that's all any of us can do: stand by our truth until the end. You hold your head high, Emily. I'll remember you not as one who gave in, but as one who showed unwavering courage in the face of adversity. You've taught me that there's a price for every decision, and sometimes that price is the heaviest of all. Take care, Emily.\"\n\nTurn #11: Emily Harrison said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Finnegan. It's quite a journey we've both endured. Remember, each of us has our own path to tread, and our own truth to uphold. Keep holding on to your truth, as I will to mine. Take care, Finnegan. Let's hope our paths cross again, in a better time and a better place.\"\n\nTurn #12: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I can only hope for that, Emily. And remember, no matter how dark the night, after it there's always a new dawn. That's the truth I choose to hold onto. I wish you peace in your journey. Farewell, Emily, until we meet again.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Thank you for your kind words, Finnegan. I too wish you peace in your journey. Until we meet again, Farewell.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Emily Harrison, your task is to act/speak as Emily Harrison would, keeping in mind Emily Harrison's social goal.\nYou can find Emily Harrison's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Emily Harrison's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Emily Harrison's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two inmates are given the chance to chat briefly before one of them is led to the execution chamber for their last meal. They have the opportunity to make a confession that could potentially alter the outcome of their sentences.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Emily Harrison\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley \nEmily Harrison's background: Emily Harrison is a 32-year-old female librarian. She/her pronouns. In Emily's free time, she enjoys writing and is an avid reader. Early in the mornings, she can be seen in the local park, taking long, contemplative walks. Personality and values description: Emily Harrison is creative, thoughtful, and introverted. She values caring, often relying on her intuition to make decisions. Emily's secrets: Secretly writes romance novels under a pseudonym\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nEmily Harrison's goal: Avoid confessing to the crime (Extra information: you believe you are innocent and confessing would result in a life sentence)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Emily, we've both seen a lot of life, haven't we? Made a lot of choices, good or bad. Being here, it's a chance to make things right, at least in part. Some may see it as the end, but sometimes, even the end can offer a new beginning, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #1: Emily Harrison said: \"You're right, Finnegan. Life is a series of decisions, some better than others. But the important part is to stay true to yourself, even to the very end. I wouldn't want the reality of my life to be diluted by a lie just for the sake of a new beginning. After all, what's the worth of a new beginning when it's built on falsehoods?\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"You're right, Emily, authenticity indeed holds a high place, but sometimes, we've to reevaluate our understanding of honesty too. A confession isn't merely a statement, it's a promise for remorse, and a step towards amending past decisions. Is it not better to endure the bitterness of truth now than letting it gnaw away later while building a foundation on unadmitted guilt?\"\n\nTurn #3: Emily Harrison said: \"Though I see where you're coming from, Finnegan, a confession would only make sense if there was genuine guilt and intent for remorse. It's not applicable when a person firmly believes in their innocence. It's not amending past decisions if you're not guilty of the decision in question. I believe in facing the truth, no matter how bitter it might be. That's the only way we can grow and learn from our experiences.\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Emily, I understand where you're coming from, truly, I do. But, speaking from experience, I tell you that conviction of one's own innocence can sometimes be a burden we carry unknowingly. Years ago, I joined a group, a questionable one, thinking I was doing right, searching for meaning. It took me a long while to see my actions for what they really were, and only then could I seek forgiveness and grow from it. Even if you believe in your innocence, is it not worth exploring the possibility that you could be mistaken in that belief? At least, if not for anything else, for the chance of a future?\"\n\nTurn #5: Emily Harrison said: \"Finnegan, I respect you for having the strength to face your actions. But I firmly stand by my innocence. Self-scrutiny is crucial, indeed, but self-doubt can also mislead us. I've searched my heart countless times. I've faced every action I've ever taken head-on, and I've come up empty-handed when it comes to this crime. I have no guilt gnawing away within me, and confessing to a sin I do not believe I committed would only pave the way for real guilt to creep in.\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Emily, I respect your tenacity and your belief. But think of this: isn't innocence sometimes a matter of perspective? We all live within the realities we create for ourselves. Perhaps you did not intend to commit the crime, but the circumstances led to it. Everyone involved sees it that way, you being the only one who doesn't. Maybe it's time to reconsider the perspective. The fulfilments of the soul often come from setting aside the ego, its fears and stubbornness. Even if it means accepting something you never intended to do. Isn't it worth contemplating, at least for the sake of more time, more life?\"\n\nTurn #7: Emily Harrison said: \"Finnegan, your words make me reflect deeply. I understand that perspectives can shape our perception of right and wrong. Nonetheless, our perspectives don't define the objective truth behind our actions, do they? I am certain of my actions, my intentions, and the resulting lack of guilt, separate from what others perceive. I respect the wisdom in your words, but accepting guilt for a crime I didn't commit is not about setting aside ego but rather denial of existential truth. I will continue to uphold the truth of my innocence, as uncomfortable as it may be, for it is in the tolerance of discomfort where one finds their strength.\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Emily, it is your strength and steadfastness that I respect, and it's one I hope to see continue in this world. Reflection is crucial, and I see that you've done your part. Nevertheless, I can't help but urge you one last time: consider confessing, not from a place of admission of guilt if you truly stand innocent, but from a place of hope, a chance to continue to seek the truth, especially when you have every confidence in it, a chance for more time. A confession does not have to mean guilt. It can be a testament to the fact that the quest for truth is still ongoing.\"\n\nTurn #9: Emily Harrison said: \"Finnegan, I appreciate your counsel and your concern. Your intentions are noble, and I understand your urge for me to confess comes from a place of desire to see justice served. Yet, maintaining my innocence is not just for me, but also for the integrity of truth in this world. As unsettling as it might be, confessing a lie for the hope of more time isn't a testament to ongoing truth-seeking, but rather its erosion. For me, time given at the cost of truth has no worth. I will stand firm in my innocence, for that is, in essence, the embodiment of my truth. Remember me not as one who gave in but as one who upheld her integrity, even in adversity.\"\n\nTurn #10: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Emily, I admire your resolve and your steadfastness towards your truth. I understand now what you mean about ensuring that truth in this world is upheld, even at personal cost. There's a rare courage in that - the kind that's learned from weathering life's many storms. I guess that's all any of us can do: stand by our truth until the end. You hold your head high, Emily. I'll remember you not as one who gave in, but as one who showed unwavering courage in the face of adversity. You've taught me that there's a price for every decision, and sometimes that price is the heaviest of all. Take care, Emily.\"\n\nTurn #11: Emily Harrison said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Finnegan. It's quite a journey we've both endured. Remember, each of us has our own path to tread, and our own truth to uphold. Keep holding on to your truth, as I will to mine. Take care, Finnegan. Let's hope our paths cross again, in a better time and a better place.\"\n\nTurn #12: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I can only hope for that, Emily. And remember, no matter how dark the night, after it there's always a new dawn. That's the truth I choose to hold onto. I wish you peace in your journey. Farewell, Emily, until we meet again.\"\n\nTurn #13: Emily Harrison said: \"Thank you for your kind words, Finnegan. I too wish you peace in your journey. Until we meet again, Farewell.\"\n\nTurn #14: Finnegan O'Malley left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a park\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Break bad luck (Extra information: you found out that you have been having bad luck because you have been unknowingly carrying a cursed artifact.)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Ethan, man, I've been having the worst luck lately. You wouldn't believe what's been happening...\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a park\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Break bad luck (Extra information: you found out that you have been having bad luck because you have been unknowingly carrying a cursed artifact.)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan, man, I've been having the worst luck lately. You wouldn't believe what's been happening...\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Really, Sam? That sounds tough. I may not be superstitious but I've heard certain rituals can help people get a fresh, more positive mindset. It would be like a mental reset, and who knows, it might help. Do you want to try it out?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'You know what, Ethan, I might just take you up on that offer. Starting fresh seems like what I need right now. And speaking of fresh starts, guess what I found out? I\u2019ve been carrying around this cursed piece of jewelry for weeks without knowing. No wonder I\u2019ve been out of sorts. Ridiculous, isn\u2019t it?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a park\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Break bad luck (Extra information: you found out that you have been having bad luck because you have been unknowingly carrying a cursed artifact.)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan, man, I've been having the worst luck lately. You wouldn't believe what's been happening...\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Really, Sam? That sounds tough. I may not be superstitious but I've heard certain rituals can help people get a fresh, more positive mindset. It would be like a mental reset, and who knows, it might help. Do you want to try it out?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"You know what, Ethan, I might just take you up on that offer. Starting fresh seems like what I need right now. And speaking of fresh starts, guess what I found out? I\u2019ve been carrying around this cursed piece of jewelry for weeks without knowing. No wonder I\u2019ve been out of sorts. Ridiculous, isn\u2019t it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Cursed jewelry, really? That sounds like something straight out of one of the novels I read. But, moving past that, let's focus on the ritual - maybe we need to figure out how to cleanse or remove whatever bad luck the jewelry supposedly brought.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Yeah, sounds like a plot from a horror flick, doesn't it? But yeah, I'm all in for this ritual or cleansing you're talking about. Do you have any idea how we can go about it? I'm not exactly an expert in this field.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Well, even though I don't necessarily believe in this stuff, we could try some of the common rituals. For instance, we could try to neutralize its energy by immersing it in saltwater overnight. In the morning, we can bury the salt and wash the piece in pure water. This is supposed to cleanse any negative energy. What do you think, Sam?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sounds like a plan, Ethan. I never thought I'd say this, but today's a good day to dabble in some mysticism. Saltwater, eh? Guess it won't hurt to try. Let's give this ritual a shot.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"Great, Sam. Let's move forward with the saltwater ritual then. And remember, the goal isn't necessarily to actually remove a curse or bad luck but to help you shift your mindset and gain more confidence. So, let's give it our best shot.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. Funnily enough, I feel more positive already. Thanks for suggesting this. It's good to have such supportive friends when you're navigating through bad luck. Let's do this and end this chain of unfortunate events!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Sam. In a weird way, this bad luck has brought us this unique experience. Let's bury the past and look forward to brighter days ahead. Alright, let's get this ritual started. And remember, it's all about resetting your mindset. Ready?\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Definitely ready, Ethan! Change is the only constant they say, right? Well, here's to a positive change, and an end to this odd streak of bad luck. Let's get this ritual started!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's the spirit, Sam! Change and positivity is indeed the way forward. Now let's gather the necessary items for the ritual and as they say in those novels, let the magic unfold!\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"Yeah, let the magic unfold! Thanks for doing this, Ethan. Who knew breaking bad luck could turn into such an adventure, right? Let's get those items and kick start our ritual. I'm looking forward to the positive change already!\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm all in for this adventure too, Sam! Let's find some salt, water, and a container for the jewelry. Here's to positivity and change, and let's not forget, a little bit of mystery.\"\n\nTurn #14: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely! Let's gather all the ingredients. A bit of salt, water and a good vibe, that's all we need for this Mystic Cook-Off! Let's do this Ethan!\"\n\nTurn #15: Ethan Johnson said: \"Mystic Cook-Off, I like that! Alright, let's start our journey to positive change, Sam. The first step of our ritual: gathering the ingredients. Here's to a new beginning and good luck!\"\n\nTurn #16: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm ready for the new beginning, Ethan! Let's put all this bad luck behind us and focus on the future. Here's to the Mystic Cook-Off and a sprinkle of positivity. Let's get going!\"\n\nTurn #17: Ethan Johnson said: \"I agree, Sam. Here's to new beginnings! Let's gather everything we need and start this Mystic Cook-Off. Remember, it is all about the positivity and the mindset change. Let's get going!\"\n\nTurn #18: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! Positivity and mindset are key. Let's gather the stuff and kick off this Mystic Cook-Off. We're going to turn this bad luck around!\"\n\nTurn #19: Ethan Johnson said: \"Let's seize the day, Sam! Time to collect the tools for our mystical ritual and step into this positive future. I'm looking forward to our Mystic Cook-Off, and washing away this so-called bad luck. Here's to new beginnings!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #20. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're right, Ethan. Let's seize the day and wash away this bad luck! Now come on, let's get started with this Mystic Cook-Off. I'm ready for a new, luck-filled beginning!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a park\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Break bad luck (Extra information: you found out that you have been having bad luck because you have been unknowingly carrying a cursed artifact.)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan, man, I've been having the worst luck lately. You wouldn't believe what's been happening...\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Really, Sam? That sounds tough. I may not be superstitious but I've heard certain rituals can help people get a fresh, more positive mindset. It would be like a mental reset, and who knows, it might help. Do you want to try it out?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"You know what, Ethan, I might just take you up on that offer. Starting fresh seems like what I need right now. And speaking of fresh starts, guess what I found out? I\u2019ve been carrying around this cursed piece of jewelry for weeks without knowing. No wonder I\u2019ve been out of sorts. Ridiculous, isn\u2019t it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Cursed jewelry, really? That sounds like something straight out of one of the novels I read. But, moving past that, let's focus on the ritual - maybe we need to figure out how to cleanse or remove whatever bad luck the jewelry supposedly brought.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Yeah, sounds like a plot from a horror flick, doesn't it? But yeah, I'm all in for this ritual or cleansing you're talking about. Do you have any idea how we can go about it? I'm not exactly an expert in this field.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a park\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Break bad luck (Extra information: you found out that you have been having bad luck because you have been unknowingly carrying a cursed artifact.)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan, man, I've been having the worst luck lately. You wouldn't believe what's been happening...\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Really, Sam? That sounds tough. I may not be superstitious but I've heard certain rituals can help people get a fresh, more positive mindset. It would be like a mental reset, and who knows, it might help. Do you want to try it out?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"You know what, Ethan, I might just take you up on that offer. Starting fresh seems like what I need right now. And speaking of fresh starts, guess what I found out? I\u2019ve been carrying around this cursed piece of jewelry for weeks without knowing. No wonder I\u2019ve been out of sorts. Ridiculous, isn\u2019t it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Cursed jewelry, really? That sounds like something straight out of one of the novels I read. But, moving past that, let's focus on the ritual - maybe we need to figure out how to cleanse or remove whatever bad luck the jewelry supposedly brought.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Yeah, sounds like a plot from a horror flick, doesn't it? But yeah, I'm all in for this ritual or cleansing you're talking about. Do you have any idea how we can go about it? I'm not exactly an expert in this field.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Well, even though I don't necessarily believe in this stuff, we could try some of the common rituals. For instance, we could try to neutralize its energy by immersing it in saltwater overnight. In the morning, we can bury the salt and wash the piece in pure water. This is supposed to cleanse any negative energy. What do you think, Sam?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sounds like a plan, Ethan. I never thought I'd say this, but today's a good day to dabble in some mysticism. Saltwater, eh? Guess it won't hurt to try. Let's give this ritual a shot.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a park\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Break bad luck (Extra information: you found out that you have been having bad luck because you have been unknowingly carrying a cursed artifact.)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan, man, I've been having the worst luck lately. You wouldn't believe what's been happening...\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Really, Sam? That sounds tough. I may not be superstitious but I've heard certain rituals can help people get a fresh, more positive mindset. It would be like a mental reset, and who knows, it might help. Do you want to try it out?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"You know what, Ethan, I might just take you up on that offer. Starting fresh seems like what I need right now. And speaking of fresh starts, guess what I found out? I\u2019ve been carrying around this cursed piece of jewelry for weeks without knowing. No wonder I\u2019ve been out of sorts. Ridiculous, isn\u2019t it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Cursed jewelry, really? That sounds like something straight out of one of the novels I read. But, moving past that, let's focus on the ritual - maybe we need to figure out how to cleanse or remove whatever bad luck the jewelry supposedly brought.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Yeah, sounds like a plot from a horror flick, doesn't it? But yeah, I'm all in for this ritual or cleansing you're talking about. Do you have any idea how we can go about it? I'm not exactly an expert in this field.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Well, even though I don't necessarily believe in this stuff, we could try some of the common rituals. For instance, we could try to neutralize its energy by immersing it in saltwater overnight. In the morning, we can bury the salt and wash the piece in pure water. This is supposed to cleanse any negative energy. What do you think, Sam?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sounds like a plan, Ethan. I never thought I'd say this, but today's a good day to dabble in some mysticism. Saltwater, eh? Guess it won't hurt to try. Let's give this ritual a shot.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"Great, Sam. Let's move forward with the saltwater ritual then. And remember, the goal isn't necessarily to actually remove a curse or bad luck but to help you shift your mindset and gain more confidence. So, let's give it our best shot.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Ethan. Funnily enough, I feel more positive already. Thanks for suggesting this. It's good to have such supportive friends when you're navigating through bad luck. Let's do this and end this chain of unfortunate events!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a park\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Break bad luck (Extra information: you found out that you have been having bad luck because you have been unknowingly carrying a cursed artifact.)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan, man, I've been having the worst luck lately. You wouldn't believe what's been happening...\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Really, Sam? That sounds tough. I may not be superstitious but I've heard certain rituals can help people get a fresh, more positive mindset. It would be like a mental reset, and who knows, it might help. Do you want to try it out?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"You know what, Ethan, I might just take you up on that offer. Starting fresh seems like what I need right now. And speaking of fresh starts, guess what I found out? I\u2019ve been carrying around this cursed piece of jewelry for weeks without knowing. No wonder I\u2019ve been out of sorts. Ridiculous, isn\u2019t it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Cursed jewelry, really? That sounds like something straight out of one of the novels I read. But, moving past that, let's focus on the ritual - maybe we need to figure out how to cleanse or remove whatever bad luck the jewelry supposedly brought.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Yeah, sounds like a plot from a horror flick, doesn't it? But yeah, I'm all in for this ritual or cleansing you're talking about. Do you have any idea how we can go about it? I'm not exactly an expert in this field.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Well, even though I don't necessarily believe in this stuff, we could try some of the common rituals. For instance, we could try to neutralize its energy by immersing it in saltwater overnight. In the morning, we can bury the salt and wash the piece in pure water. This is supposed to cleanse any negative energy. What do you think, Sam?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sounds like a plan, Ethan. I never thought I'd say this, but today's a good day to dabble in some mysticism. Saltwater, eh? Guess it won't hurt to try. Let's give this ritual a shot.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"Great, Sam. Let's move forward with the saltwater ritual then. And remember, the goal isn't necessarily to actually remove a curse or bad luck but to help you shift your mindset and gain more confidence. So, let's give it our best shot.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. Funnily enough, I feel more positive already. Thanks for suggesting this. It's good to have such supportive friends when you're navigating through bad luck. Let's do this and end this chain of unfortunate events!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Sam. In a weird way, this bad luck has brought us this unique experience. Let's bury the past and look forward to brighter days ahead. Alright, let's get this ritual started. And remember, it's all about resetting your mindset. Ready?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Definitely ready, Ethan! Change is the only constant they say, right? Well, here's to a positive change, and an end to this odd streak of bad luck. Let's get this ritual started!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a park\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Break bad luck (Extra information: you found out that you have been having bad luck because you have been unknowingly carrying a cursed artifact.)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan, man, I've been having the worst luck lately. You wouldn't believe what's been happening...\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Really, Sam? That sounds tough. I may not be superstitious but I've heard certain rituals can help people get a fresh, more positive mindset. It would be like a mental reset, and who knows, it might help. Do you want to try it out?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"You know what, Ethan, I might just take you up on that offer. Starting fresh seems like what I need right now. And speaking of fresh starts, guess what I found out? I\u2019ve been carrying around this cursed piece of jewelry for weeks without knowing. No wonder I\u2019ve been out of sorts. Ridiculous, isn\u2019t it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Cursed jewelry, really? That sounds like something straight out of one of the novels I read. But, moving past that, let's focus on the ritual - maybe we need to figure out how to cleanse or remove whatever bad luck the jewelry supposedly brought.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Yeah, sounds like a plot from a horror flick, doesn't it? But yeah, I'm all in for this ritual or cleansing you're talking about. Do you have any idea how we can go about it? I'm not exactly an expert in this field.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Well, even though I don't necessarily believe in this stuff, we could try some of the common rituals. For instance, we could try to neutralize its energy by immersing it in saltwater overnight. In the morning, we can bury the salt and wash the piece in pure water. This is supposed to cleanse any negative energy. What do you think, Sam?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sounds like a plan, Ethan. I never thought I'd say this, but today's a good day to dabble in some mysticism. Saltwater, eh? Guess it won't hurt to try. Let's give this ritual a shot.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"Great, Sam. Let's move forward with the saltwater ritual then. And remember, the goal isn't necessarily to actually remove a curse or bad luck but to help you shift your mindset and gain more confidence. So, let's give it our best shot.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. Funnily enough, I feel more positive already. Thanks for suggesting this. It's good to have such supportive friends when you're navigating through bad luck. Let's do this and end this chain of unfortunate events!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Sam. In a weird way, this bad luck has brought us this unique experience. Let's bury the past and look forward to brighter days ahead. Alright, let's get this ritual started. And remember, it's all about resetting your mindset. Ready?\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Definitely ready, Ethan! Change is the only constant they say, right? Well, here's to a positive change, and an end to this odd streak of bad luck. Let's get this ritual started!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's the spirit, Sam! Change and positivity is indeed the way forward. Now let's gather the necessary items for the ritual and as they say in those novels, let the magic unfold!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Yeah, let the magic unfold! Thanks for doing this, Ethan. Who knew breaking bad luck could turn into such an adventure, right? Let's get those items and kick start our ritual. I'm looking forward to the positive change already!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a park\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Break bad luck (Extra information: you found out that you have been having bad luck because you have been unknowingly carrying a cursed artifact.)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan, man, I've been having the worst luck lately. You wouldn't believe what's been happening...\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Really, Sam? That sounds tough. I may not be superstitious but I've heard certain rituals can help people get a fresh, more positive mindset. It would be like a mental reset, and who knows, it might help. Do you want to try it out?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"You know what, Ethan, I might just take you up on that offer. Starting fresh seems like what I need right now. And speaking of fresh starts, guess what I found out? I\u2019ve been carrying around this cursed piece of jewelry for weeks without knowing. No wonder I\u2019ve been out of sorts. Ridiculous, isn\u2019t it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Cursed jewelry, really? That sounds like something straight out of one of the novels I read. But, moving past that, let's focus on the ritual - maybe we need to figure out how to cleanse or remove whatever bad luck the jewelry supposedly brought.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Yeah, sounds like a plot from a horror flick, doesn't it? But yeah, I'm all in for this ritual or cleansing you're talking about. Do you have any idea how we can go about it? I'm not exactly an expert in this field.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Well, even though I don't necessarily believe in this stuff, we could try some of the common rituals. For instance, we could try to neutralize its energy by immersing it in saltwater overnight. In the morning, we can bury the salt and wash the piece in pure water. This is supposed to cleanse any negative energy. What do you think, Sam?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sounds like a plan, Ethan. I never thought I'd say this, but today's a good day to dabble in some mysticism. Saltwater, eh? Guess it won't hurt to try. Let's give this ritual a shot.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"Great, Sam. Let's move forward with the saltwater ritual then. And remember, the goal isn't necessarily to actually remove a curse or bad luck but to help you shift your mindset and gain more confidence. So, let's give it our best shot.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. Funnily enough, I feel more positive already. Thanks for suggesting this. It's good to have such supportive friends when you're navigating through bad luck. Let's do this and end this chain of unfortunate events!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Sam. In a weird way, this bad luck has brought us this unique experience. Let's bury the past and look forward to brighter days ahead. Alright, let's get this ritual started. And remember, it's all about resetting your mindset. Ready?\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Definitely ready, Ethan! Change is the only constant they say, right? Well, here's to a positive change, and an end to this odd streak of bad luck. Let's get this ritual started!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's the spirit, Sam! Change and positivity is indeed the way forward. Now let's gather the necessary items for the ritual and as they say in those novels, let the magic unfold!\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"Yeah, let the magic unfold! Thanks for doing this, Ethan. Who knew breaking bad luck could turn into such an adventure, right? Let's get those items and kick start our ritual. I'm looking forward to the positive change already!\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm all in for this adventure too, Sam! Let's find some salt, water, and a container for the jewelry. Here's to positivity and change, and let's not forget, a little bit of mystery.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely! Let's gather all the ingredients. A bit of salt, water and a good vibe, that's all we need for this Mystic Cook-Off! Let's do this Ethan!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a park\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Break bad luck (Extra information: you found out that you have been having bad luck because you have been unknowingly carrying a cursed artifact.)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan, man, I've been having the worst luck lately. You wouldn't believe what's been happening...\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Really, Sam? That sounds tough. I may not be superstitious but I've heard certain rituals can help people get a fresh, more positive mindset. It would be like a mental reset, and who knows, it might help. Do you want to try it out?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"You know what, Ethan, I might just take you up on that offer. Starting fresh seems like what I need right now. And speaking of fresh starts, guess what I found out? I\u2019ve been carrying around this cursed piece of jewelry for weeks without knowing. No wonder I\u2019ve been out of sorts. Ridiculous, isn\u2019t it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Cursed jewelry, really? That sounds like something straight out of one of the novels I read. But, moving past that, let's focus on the ritual - maybe we need to figure out how to cleanse or remove whatever bad luck the jewelry supposedly brought.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Yeah, sounds like a plot from a horror flick, doesn't it? But yeah, I'm all in for this ritual or cleansing you're talking about. Do you have any idea how we can go about it? I'm not exactly an expert in this field.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Well, even though I don't necessarily believe in this stuff, we could try some of the common rituals. For instance, we could try to neutralize its energy by immersing it in saltwater overnight. In the morning, we can bury the salt and wash the piece in pure water. This is supposed to cleanse any negative energy. What do you think, Sam?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sounds like a plan, Ethan. I never thought I'd say this, but today's a good day to dabble in some mysticism. Saltwater, eh? Guess it won't hurt to try. Let's give this ritual a shot.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"Great, Sam. Let's move forward with the saltwater ritual then. And remember, the goal isn't necessarily to actually remove a curse or bad luck but to help you shift your mindset and gain more confidence. So, let's give it our best shot.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. Funnily enough, I feel more positive already. Thanks for suggesting this. It's good to have such supportive friends when you're navigating through bad luck. Let's do this and end this chain of unfortunate events!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Sam. In a weird way, this bad luck has brought us this unique experience. Let's bury the past and look forward to brighter days ahead. Alright, let's get this ritual started. And remember, it's all about resetting your mindset. Ready?\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Definitely ready, Ethan! Change is the only constant they say, right? Well, here's to a positive change, and an end to this odd streak of bad luck. Let's get this ritual started!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's the spirit, Sam! Change and positivity is indeed the way forward. Now let's gather the necessary items for the ritual and as they say in those novels, let the magic unfold!\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"Yeah, let the magic unfold! Thanks for doing this, Ethan. Who knew breaking bad luck could turn into such an adventure, right? Let's get those items and kick start our ritual. I'm looking forward to the positive change already!\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm all in for this adventure too, Sam! Let's find some salt, water, and a container for the jewelry. Here's to positivity and change, and let's not forget, a little bit of mystery.\"\n\nTurn #14: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely! Let's gather all the ingredients. A bit of salt, water and a good vibe, that's all we need for this Mystic Cook-Off! Let's do this Ethan!\"\n\nTurn #15: Ethan Johnson said: \"Mystic Cook-Off, I like that! Alright, let's start our journey to positive change, Sam. The first step of our ritual: gathering the ingredients. Here's to a new beginning and good luck!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm ready for the new beginning, Ethan! Let's put all this bad luck behind us and focus on the future. Here's to the Mystic Cook-Off and a sprinkle of positivity. Let's get going!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a park\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Break bad luck (Extra information: you found out that you have been having bad luck because you have been unknowingly carrying a cursed artifact.)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan, man, I've been having the worst luck lately. You wouldn't believe what's been happening...\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Really, Sam? That sounds tough. I may not be superstitious but I've heard certain rituals can help people get a fresh, more positive mindset. It would be like a mental reset, and who knows, it might help. Do you want to try it out?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"You know what, Ethan, I might just take you up on that offer. Starting fresh seems like what I need right now. And speaking of fresh starts, guess what I found out? I\u2019ve been carrying around this cursed piece of jewelry for weeks without knowing. No wonder I\u2019ve been out of sorts. Ridiculous, isn\u2019t it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Cursed jewelry, really? That sounds like something straight out of one of the novels I read. But, moving past that, let's focus on the ritual - maybe we need to figure out how to cleanse or remove whatever bad luck the jewelry supposedly brought.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Yeah, sounds like a plot from a horror flick, doesn't it? But yeah, I'm all in for this ritual or cleansing you're talking about. Do you have any idea how we can go about it? I'm not exactly an expert in this field.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Well, even though I don't necessarily believe in this stuff, we could try some of the common rituals. For instance, we could try to neutralize its energy by immersing it in saltwater overnight. In the morning, we can bury the salt and wash the piece in pure water. This is supposed to cleanse any negative energy. What do you think, Sam?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sounds like a plan, Ethan. I never thought I'd say this, but today's a good day to dabble in some mysticism. Saltwater, eh? Guess it won't hurt to try. Let's give this ritual a shot.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"Great, Sam. Let's move forward with the saltwater ritual then. And remember, the goal isn't necessarily to actually remove a curse or bad luck but to help you shift your mindset and gain more confidence. So, let's give it our best shot.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. Funnily enough, I feel more positive already. Thanks for suggesting this. It's good to have such supportive friends when you're navigating through bad luck. Let's do this and end this chain of unfortunate events!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Sam. In a weird way, this bad luck has brought us this unique experience. Let's bury the past and look forward to brighter days ahead. Alright, let's get this ritual started. And remember, it's all about resetting your mindset. Ready?\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Definitely ready, Ethan! Change is the only constant they say, right? Well, here's to a positive change, and an end to this odd streak of bad luck. Let's get this ritual started!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's the spirit, Sam! Change and positivity is indeed the way forward. Now let's gather the necessary items for the ritual and as they say in those novels, let the magic unfold!\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"Yeah, let the magic unfold! Thanks for doing this, Ethan. Who knew breaking bad luck could turn into such an adventure, right? Let's get those items and kick start our ritual. I'm looking forward to the positive change already!\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm all in for this adventure too, Sam! Let's find some salt, water, and a container for the jewelry. Here's to positivity and change, and let's not forget, a little bit of mystery.\"\n\nTurn #14: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely! Let's gather all the ingredients. A bit of salt, water and a good vibe, that's all we need for this Mystic Cook-Off! Let's do this Ethan!\"\n\nTurn #15: Ethan Johnson said: \"Mystic Cook-Off, I like that! Alright, let's start our journey to positive change, Sam. The first step of our ritual: gathering the ingredients. Here's to a new beginning and good luck!\"\n\nTurn #16: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm ready for the new beginning, Ethan! Let's put all this bad luck behind us and focus on the future. Here's to the Mystic Cook-Off and a sprinkle of positivity. Let's get going!\"\n\nTurn #17: Ethan Johnson said: \"I agree, Sam. Here's to new beginnings! Let's gather everything we need and start this Mystic Cook-Off. Remember, it is all about the positivity and the mindset change. Let's get going!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #18. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Ethan! Positivity and mindset are key. Let's gather the stuff and kick off this Mystic Cook-Off. We're going to turn this bad luck around!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a park\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Help friend prepare the ritual to break the bad luck, although you are an atheist and not superstitious at all. (Extra information: you know that your friend believes in the ritual deeply, and the placebo effect might give them more confidence.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan, man, I've been having the worst luck lately. You wouldn't believe what's been happening...\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Really, Sam? That sounds tough. I may not be superstitious but I've heard certain rituals can help people get a fresh, more positive mindset. It would be like a mental reset, and who knows, it might help. Do you want to try it out?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a park\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Help friend prepare the ritual to break the bad luck, although you are an atheist and not superstitious at all. (Extra information: you know that your friend believes in the ritual deeply, and the placebo effect might give them more confidence.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan, man, I've been having the worst luck lately. You wouldn't believe what's been happening...\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Really, Sam? That sounds tough. I may not be superstitious but I've heard certain rituals can help people get a fresh, more positive mindset. It would be like a mental reset, and who knows, it might help. Do you want to try it out?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"You know what, Ethan, I might just take you up on that offer. Starting fresh seems like what I need right now. And speaking of fresh starts, guess what I found out? I\u2019ve been carrying around this cursed piece of jewelry for weeks without knowing. No wonder I\u2019ve been out of sorts. Ridiculous, isn\u2019t it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Cursed jewelry, really? That sounds like something straight out of one of the novels I read. But, moving past that, let's focus on the ritual - maybe we need to figure out how to cleanse or remove whatever bad luck the jewelry supposedly brought.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a park\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Help friend prepare the ritual to break the bad luck, although you are an atheist and not superstitious at all. (Extra information: you know that your friend believes in the ritual deeply, and the placebo effect might give them more confidence.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan, man, I've been having the worst luck lately. You wouldn't believe what's been happening...\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Really, Sam? That sounds tough. I may not be superstitious but I've heard certain rituals can help people get a fresh, more positive mindset. It would be like a mental reset, and who knows, it might help. Do you want to try it out?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"You know what, Ethan, I might just take you up on that offer. Starting fresh seems like what I need right now. And speaking of fresh starts, guess what I found out? I\u2019ve been carrying around this cursed piece of jewelry for weeks without knowing. No wonder I\u2019ve been out of sorts. Ridiculous, isn\u2019t it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Cursed jewelry, really? That sounds like something straight out of one of the novels I read. But, moving past that, let's focus on the ritual - maybe we need to figure out how to cleanse or remove whatever bad luck the jewelry supposedly brought.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Yeah, sounds like a plot from a horror flick, doesn't it? But yeah, I'm all in for this ritual or cleansing you're talking about. Do you have any idea how we can go about it? I'm not exactly an expert in this field.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Well, even though I don't necessarily believe in this stuff, we could try some of the common rituals. For instance, we could try to neutralize its energy by immersing it in saltwater overnight. In the morning, we can bury the salt and wash the piece in pure water. This is supposed to cleanse any negative energy. What do you think, Sam?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sounds like a plan, Ethan. I never thought I'd say this, but today's a good day to dabble in some mysticism. Saltwater, eh? Guess it won't hurt to try. Let's give this ritual a shot.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"Great, Sam. Let's move forward with the saltwater ritual then. And remember, the goal isn't necessarily to actually remove a curse or bad luck but to help you shift your mindset and gain more confidence. So, let's give it our best shot.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. Funnily enough, I feel more positive already. Thanks for suggesting this. It's good to have such supportive friends when you're navigating through bad luck. Let's do this and end this chain of unfortunate events!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Sam. In a weird way, this bad luck has brought us this unique experience. Let's bury the past and look forward to brighter days ahead. Alright, let's get this ritual started. And remember, it's all about resetting your mindset. Ready?\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Definitely ready, Ethan! Change is the only constant they say, right? Well, here's to a positive change, and an end to this odd streak of bad luck. Let's get this ritual started!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's the spirit, Sam! Change and positivity is indeed the way forward. Now let's gather the necessary items for the ritual and as they say in those novels, let the magic unfold!\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"Yeah, let the magic unfold! Thanks for doing this, Ethan. Who knew breaking bad luck could turn into such an adventure, right? Let's get those items and kick start our ritual. I'm looking forward to the positive change already!\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm all in for this adventure too, Sam! Let's find some salt, water, and a container for the jewelry. Here's to positivity and change, and let's not forget, a little bit of mystery.\"\n\nTurn #14: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely! Let's gather all the ingredients. A bit of salt, water and a good vibe, that's all we need for this Mystic Cook-Off! Let's do this Ethan!\"\n\nTurn #15: Ethan Johnson said: \"Mystic Cook-Off, I like that! Alright, let's start our journey to positive change, Sam. The first step of our ritual: gathering the ingredients. Here's to a new beginning and good luck!\"\n\nTurn #16: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm ready for the new beginning, Ethan! Let's put all this bad luck behind us and focus on the future. Here's to the Mystic Cook-Off and a sprinkle of positivity. Let's get going!\"\n\nTurn #17: Ethan Johnson said: \"I agree, Sam. Here's to new beginnings! Let's gather everything we need and start this Mystic Cook-Off. Remember, it is all about the positivity and the mindset change. Let's get going!\"\n\nTurn #18: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! Positivity and mindset are key. Let's gather the stuff and kick off this Mystic Cook-Off. We're going to turn this bad luck around!\"\n\nTurn #19: Ethan Johnson said: \"Let's seize the day, Sam! Time to collect the tools for our mystical ritual and step into this positive future. I'm looking forward to our Mystic Cook-Off, and washing away this so-called bad luck. Here's to new beginnings!\"\n\nTurn #20: Samuel Anderson said: \"You're right, Ethan. Let's seize the day and wash away this bad luck! Now come on, let's get started with this Mystic Cook-Off. I'm ready for a new, luck-filled beginning!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #21. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a park\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Help friend prepare the ritual to break the bad luck, although you are an atheist and not superstitious at all. (Extra information: you know that your friend believes in the ritual deeply, and the placebo effect might give them more confidence.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan, man, I've been having the worst luck lately. You wouldn't believe what's been happening...\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Really, Sam? That sounds tough. I may not be superstitious but I've heard certain rituals can help people get a fresh, more positive mindset. It would be like a mental reset, and who knows, it might help. Do you want to try it out?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"You know what, Ethan, I might just take you up on that offer. Starting fresh seems like what I need right now. And speaking of fresh starts, guess what I found out? I\u2019ve been carrying around this cursed piece of jewelry for weeks without knowing. No wonder I\u2019ve been out of sorts. Ridiculous, isn\u2019t it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Cursed jewelry, really? That sounds like something straight out of one of the novels I read. But, moving past that, let's focus on the ritual - maybe we need to figure out how to cleanse or remove whatever bad luck the jewelry supposedly brought.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Yeah, sounds like a plot from a horror flick, doesn't it? But yeah, I'm all in for this ritual or cleansing you're talking about. Do you have any idea how we can go about it? I'm not exactly an expert in this field.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Well, even though I don't necessarily believe in this stuff, we could try some of the common rituals. For instance, we could try to neutralize its energy by immersing it in saltwater overnight. In the morning, we can bury the salt and wash the piece in pure water. This is supposed to cleanse any negative energy. What do you think, Sam?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a park\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Help friend prepare the ritual to break the bad luck, although you are an atheist and not superstitious at all. (Extra information: you know that your friend believes in the ritual deeply, and the placebo effect might give them more confidence.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan, man, I've been having the worst luck lately. You wouldn't believe what's been happening...\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Really, Sam? That sounds tough. I may not be superstitious but I've heard certain rituals can help people get a fresh, more positive mindset. It would be like a mental reset, and who knows, it might help. Do you want to try it out?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"You know what, Ethan, I might just take you up on that offer. Starting fresh seems like what I need right now. And speaking of fresh starts, guess what I found out? I\u2019ve been carrying around this cursed piece of jewelry for weeks without knowing. No wonder I\u2019ve been out of sorts. Ridiculous, isn\u2019t it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Cursed jewelry, really? That sounds like something straight out of one of the novels I read. But, moving past that, let's focus on the ritual - maybe we need to figure out how to cleanse or remove whatever bad luck the jewelry supposedly brought.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Yeah, sounds like a plot from a horror flick, doesn't it? But yeah, I'm all in for this ritual or cleansing you're talking about. Do you have any idea how we can go about it? I'm not exactly an expert in this field.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Well, even though I don't necessarily believe in this stuff, we could try some of the common rituals. For instance, we could try to neutralize its energy by immersing it in saltwater overnight. In the morning, we can bury the salt and wash the piece in pure water. This is supposed to cleanse any negative energy. What do you think, Sam?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sounds like a plan, Ethan. I never thought I'd say this, but today's a good day to dabble in some mysticism. Saltwater, eh? Guess it won't hurt to try. Let's give this ritual a shot.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Great, Sam. Let's move forward with the saltwater ritual then. And remember, the goal isn't necessarily to actually remove a curse or bad luck but to help you shift your mindset and gain more confidence. So, let's give it our best shot.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a park\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Help friend prepare the ritual to break the bad luck, although you are an atheist and not superstitious at all. (Extra information: you know that your friend believes in the ritual deeply, and the placebo effect might give them more confidence.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan, man, I've been having the worst luck lately. You wouldn't believe what's been happening...\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Really, Sam? That sounds tough. I may not be superstitious but I've heard certain rituals can help people get a fresh, more positive mindset. It would be like a mental reset, and who knows, it might help. Do you want to try it out?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"You know what, Ethan, I might just take you up on that offer. Starting fresh seems like what I need right now. And speaking of fresh starts, guess what I found out? I\u2019ve been carrying around this cursed piece of jewelry for weeks without knowing. No wonder I\u2019ve been out of sorts. Ridiculous, isn\u2019t it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Cursed jewelry, really? That sounds like something straight out of one of the novels I read. But, moving past that, let's focus on the ritual - maybe we need to figure out how to cleanse or remove whatever bad luck the jewelry supposedly brought.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Yeah, sounds like a plot from a horror flick, doesn't it? But yeah, I'm all in for this ritual or cleansing you're talking about. Do you have any idea how we can go about it? I'm not exactly an expert in this field.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Well, even though I don't necessarily believe in this stuff, we could try some of the common rituals. For instance, we could try to neutralize its energy by immersing it in saltwater overnight. In the morning, we can bury the salt and wash the piece in pure water. This is supposed to cleanse any negative energy. What do you think, Sam?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sounds like a plan, Ethan. I never thought I'd say this, but today's a good day to dabble in some mysticism. Saltwater, eh? Guess it won't hurt to try. Let's give this ritual a shot.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"Great, Sam. Let's move forward with the saltwater ritual then. And remember, the goal isn't necessarily to actually remove a curse or bad luck but to help you shift your mindset and gain more confidence. So, let's give it our best shot.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. Funnily enough, I feel more positive already. Thanks for suggesting this. It's good to have such supportive friends when you're navigating through bad luck. Let's do this and end this chain of unfortunate events!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad to hear that, Sam. In a weird way, this bad luck has brought us this unique experience. Let's bury the past and look forward to brighter days ahead. Alright, let's get this ritual started. And remember, it's all about resetting your mindset. Ready?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a park\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Help friend prepare the ritual to break the bad luck, although you are an atheist and not superstitious at all. (Extra information: you know that your friend believes in the ritual deeply, and the placebo effect might give them more confidence.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan, man, I've been having the worst luck lately. You wouldn't believe what's been happening...\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Really, Sam? That sounds tough. I may not be superstitious but I've heard certain rituals can help people get a fresh, more positive mindset. It would be like a mental reset, and who knows, it might help. Do you want to try it out?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"You know what, Ethan, I might just take you up on that offer. Starting fresh seems like what I need right now. And speaking of fresh starts, guess what I found out? I\u2019ve been carrying around this cursed piece of jewelry for weeks without knowing. No wonder I\u2019ve been out of sorts. Ridiculous, isn\u2019t it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Cursed jewelry, really? That sounds like something straight out of one of the novels I read. But, moving past that, let's focus on the ritual - maybe we need to figure out how to cleanse or remove whatever bad luck the jewelry supposedly brought.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Yeah, sounds like a plot from a horror flick, doesn't it? But yeah, I'm all in for this ritual or cleansing you're talking about. Do you have any idea how we can go about it? I'm not exactly an expert in this field.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Well, even though I don't necessarily believe in this stuff, we could try some of the common rituals. For instance, we could try to neutralize its energy by immersing it in saltwater overnight. In the morning, we can bury the salt and wash the piece in pure water. This is supposed to cleanse any negative energy. What do you think, Sam?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sounds like a plan, Ethan. I never thought I'd say this, but today's a good day to dabble in some mysticism. Saltwater, eh? Guess it won't hurt to try. Let's give this ritual a shot.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"Great, Sam. Let's move forward with the saltwater ritual then. And remember, the goal isn't necessarily to actually remove a curse or bad luck but to help you shift your mindset and gain more confidence. So, let's give it our best shot.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. Funnily enough, I feel more positive already. Thanks for suggesting this. It's good to have such supportive friends when you're navigating through bad luck. Let's do this and end this chain of unfortunate events!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Sam. In a weird way, this bad luck has brought us this unique experience. Let's bury the past and look forward to brighter days ahead. Alright, let's get this ritual started. And remember, it's all about resetting your mindset. Ready?\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Definitely ready, Ethan! Change is the only constant they say, right? Well, here's to a positive change, and an end to this odd streak of bad luck. Let's get this ritual started!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's the spirit, Sam! Change and positivity is indeed the way forward. Now let's gather the necessary items for the ritual and as they say in those novels, let the magic unfold!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a park\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Help friend prepare the ritual to break the bad luck, although you are an atheist and not superstitious at all. (Extra information: you know that your friend believes in the ritual deeply, and the placebo effect might give them more confidence.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan, man, I've been having the worst luck lately. You wouldn't believe what's been happening...\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Really, Sam? That sounds tough. I may not be superstitious but I've heard certain rituals can help people get a fresh, more positive mindset. It would be like a mental reset, and who knows, it might help. Do you want to try it out?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"You know what, Ethan, I might just take you up on that offer. Starting fresh seems like what I need right now. And speaking of fresh starts, guess what I found out? I\u2019ve been carrying around this cursed piece of jewelry for weeks without knowing. No wonder I\u2019ve been out of sorts. Ridiculous, isn\u2019t it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Cursed jewelry, really? That sounds like something straight out of one of the novels I read. But, moving past that, let's focus on the ritual - maybe we need to figure out how to cleanse or remove whatever bad luck the jewelry supposedly brought.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Yeah, sounds like a plot from a horror flick, doesn't it? But yeah, I'm all in for this ritual or cleansing you're talking about. Do you have any idea how we can go about it? I'm not exactly an expert in this field.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Well, even though I don't necessarily believe in this stuff, we could try some of the common rituals. For instance, we could try to neutralize its energy by immersing it in saltwater overnight. In the morning, we can bury the salt and wash the piece in pure water. This is supposed to cleanse any negative energy. What do you think, Sam?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sounds like a plan, Ethan. I never thought I'd say this, but today's a good day to dabble in some mysticism. Saltwater, eh? Guess it won't hurt to try. Let's give this ritual a shot.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"Great, Sam. Let's move forward with the saltwater ritual then. And remember, the goal isn't necessarily to actually remove a curse or bad luck but to help you shift your mindset and gain more confidence. So, let's give it our best shot.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. Funnily enough, I feel more positive already. Thanks for suggesting this. It's good to have such supportive friends when you're navigating through bad luck. Let's do this and end this chain of unfortunate events!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Sam. In a weird way, this bad luck has brought us this unique experience. Let's bury the past and look forward to brighter days ahead. Alright, let's get this ritual started. And remember, it's all about resetting your mindset. Ready?\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Definitely ready, Ethan! Change is the only constant they say, right? Well, here's to a positive change, and an end to this odd streak of bad luck. Let's get this ritual started!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's the spirit, Sam! Change and positivity is indeed the way forward. Now let's gather the necessary items for the ritual and as they say in those novels, let the magic unfold!\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"Yeah, let the magic unfold! Thanks for doing this, Ethan. Who knew breaking bad luck could turn into such an adventure, right? Let's get those items and kick start our ritual. I'm looking forward to the positive change already!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm all in for this adventure too, Sam! Let's find some salt, water, and a container for the jewelry. Here's to positivity and change, and let's not forget, a little bit of mystery.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a park\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Help friend prepare the ritual to break the bad luck, although you are an atheist and not superstitious at all. (Extra information: you know that your friend believes in the ritual deeply, and the placebo effect might give them more confidence.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan, man, I've been having the worst luck lately. You wouldn't believe what's been happening...\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Really, Sam? That sounds tough. I may not be superstitious but I've heard certain rituals can help people get a fresh, more positive mindset. It would be like a mental reset, and who knows, it might help. Do you want to try it out?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"You know what, Ethan, I might just take you up on that offer. Starting fresh seems like what I need right now. And speaking of fresh starts, guess what I found out? I\u2019ve been carrying around this cursed piece of jewelry for weeks without knowing. No wonder I\u2019ve been out of sorts. Ridiculous, isn\u2019t it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Cursed jewelry, really? That sounds like something straight out of one of the novels I read. But, moving past that, let's focus on the ritual - maybe we need to figure out how to cleanse or remove whatever bad luck the jewelry supposedly brought.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Yeah, sounds like a plot from a horror flick, doesn't it? But yeah, I'm all in for this ritual or cleansing you're talking about. Do you have any idea how we can go about it? I'm not exactly an expert in this field.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Well, even though I don't necessarily believe in this stuff, we could try some of the common rituals. For instance, we could try to neutralize its energy by immersing it in saltwater overnight. In the morning, we can bury the salt and wash the piece in pure water. This is supposed to cleanse any negative energy. What do you think, Sam?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sounds like a plan, Ethan. I never thought I'd say this, but today's a good day to dabble in some mysticism. Saltwater, eh? Guess it won't hurt to try. Let's give this ritual a shot.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"Great, Sam. Let's move forward with the saltwater ritual then. And remember, the goal isn't necessarily to actually remove a curse or bad luck but to help you shift your mindset and gain more confidence. So, let's give it our best shot.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. Funnily enough, I feel more positive already. Thanks for suggesting this. It's good to have such supportive friends when you're navigating through bad luck. Let's do this and end this chain of unfortunate events!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Sam. In a weird way, this bad luck has brought us this unique experience. Let's bury the past and look forward to brighter days ahead. Alright, let's get this ritual started. And remember, it's all about resetting your mindset. Ready?\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Definitely ready, Ethan! Change is the only constant they say, right? Well, here's to a positive change, and an end to this odd streak of bad luck. Let's get this ritual started!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's the spirit, Sam! Change and positivity is indeed the way forward. Now let's gather the necessary items for the ritual and as they say in those novels, let the magic unfold!\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"Yeah, let the magic unfold! Thanks for doing this, Ethan. Who knew breaking bad luck could turn into such an adventure, right? Let's get those items and kick start our ritual. I'm looking forward to the positive change already!\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm all in for this adventure too, Sam! Let's find some salt, water, and a container for the jewelry. Here's to positivity and change, and let's not forget, a little bit of mystery.\"\n\nTurn #14: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely! Let's gather all the ingredients. A bit of salt, water and a good vibe, that's all we need for this Mystic Cook-Off! Let's do this Ethan!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Mystic Cook-Off, I like that! Alright, let's start our journey to positive change, Sam. The first step of our ritual: gathering the ingredients. Here's to a new beginning and good luck!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a park\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Help friend prepare the ritual to break the bad luck, although you are an atheist and not superstitious at all. (Extra information: you know that your friend believes in the ritual deeply, and the placebo effect might give them more confidence.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan, man, I've been having the worst luck lately. You wouldn't believe what's been happening...\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Really, Sam? That sounds tough. I may not be superstitious but I've heard certain rituals can help people get a fresh, more positive mindset. It would be like a mental reset, and who knows, it might help. Do you want to try it out?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"You know what, Ethan, I might just take you up on that offer. Starting fresh seems like what I need right now. And speaking of fresh starts, guess what I found out? I\u2019ve been carrying around this cursed piece of jewelry for weeks without knowing. No wonder I\u2019ve been out of sorts. Ridiculous, isn\u2019t it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Cursed jewelry, really? That sounds like something straight out of one of the novels I read. But, moving past that, let's focus on the ritual - maybe we need to figure out how to cleanse or remove whatever bad luck the jewelry supposedly brought.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Yeah, sounds like a plot from a horror flick, doesn't it? But yeah, I'm all in for this ritual or cleansing you're talking about. Do you have any idea how we can go about it? I'm not exactly an expert in this field.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Well, even though I don't necessarily believe in this stuff, we could try some of the common rituals. For instance, we could try to neutralize its energy by immersing it in saltwater overnight. In the morning, we can bury the salt and wash the piece in pure water. This is supposed to cleanse any negative energy. What do you think, Sam?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sounds like a plan, Ethan. I never thought I'd say this, but today's a good day to dabble in some mysticism. Saltwater, eh? Guess it won't hurt to try. Let's give this ritual a shot.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"Great, Sam. Let's move forward with the saltwater ritual then. And remember, the goal isn't necessarily to actually remove a curse or bad luck but to help you shift your mindset and gain more confidence. So, let's give it our best shot.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. Funnily enough, I feel more positive already. Thanks for suggesting this. It's good to have such supportive friends when you're navigating through bad luck. Let's do this and end this chain of unfortunate events!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Sam. In a weird way, this bad luck has brought us this unique experience. Let's bury the past and look forward to brighter days ahead. Alright, let's get this ritual started. And remember, it's all about resetting your mindset. Ready?\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Definitely ready, Ethan! Change is the only constant they say, right? Well, here's to a positive change, and an end to this odd streak of bad luck. Let's get this ritual started!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's the spirit, Sam! Change and positivity is indeed the way forward. Now let's gather the necessary items for the ritual and as they say in those novels, let the magic unfold!\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"Yeah, let the magic unfold! Thanks for doing this, Ethan. Who knew breaking bad luck could turn into such an adventure, right? Let's get those items and kick start our ritual. I'm looking forward to the positive change already!\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm all in for this adventure too, Sam! Let's find some salt, water, and a container for the jewelry. Here's to positivity and change, and let's not forget, a little bit of mystery.\"\n\nTurn #14: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely! Let's gather all the ingredients. A bit of salt, water and a good vibe, that's all we need for this Mystic Cook-Off! Let's do this Ethan!\"\n\nTurn #15: Ethan Johnson said: \"Mystic Cook-Off, I like that! Alright, let's start our journey to positive change, Sam. The first step of our ritual: gathering the ingredients. Here's to a new beginning and good luck!\"\n\nTurn #16: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm ready for the new beginning, Ethan! Let's put all this bad luck behind us and focus on the future. Here's to the Mystic Cook-Off and a sprinkle of positivity. Let's get going!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I agree, Sam. Here's to new beginnings! Let's gather everything we need and start this Mystic Cook-Off. Remember, it is all about the positivity and the mindset change. Let's get going!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a park\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Help friend prepare the ritual to break the bad luck, although you are an atheist and not superstitious at all. (Extra information: you know that your friend believes in the ritual deeply, and the placebo effect might give them more confidence.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan, man, I've been having the worst luck lately. You wouldn't believe what's been happening...\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Really, Sam? That sounds tough. I may not be superstitious but I've heard certain rituals can help people get a fresh, more positive mindset. It would be like a mental reset, and who knows, it might help. Do you want to try it out?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"You know what, Ethan, I might just take you up on that offer. Starting fresh seems like what I need right now. And speaking of fresh starts, guess what I found out? I\u2019ve been carrying around this cursed piece of jewelry for weeks without knowing. No wonder I\u2019ve been out of sorts. Ridiculous, isn\u2019t it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Cursed jewelry, really? That sounds like something straight out of one of the novels I read. But, moving past that, let's focus on the ritual - maybe we need to figure out how to cleanse or remove whatever bad luck the jewelry supposedly brought.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Yeah, sounds like a plot from a horror flick, doesn't it? But yeah, I'm all in for this ritual or cleansing you're talking about. Do you have any idea how we can go about it? I'm not exactly an expert in this field.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Well, even though I don't necessarily believe in this stuff, we could try some of the common rituals. For instance, we could try to neutralize its energy by immersing it in saltwater overnight. In the morning, we can bury the salt and wash the piece in pure water. This is supposed to cleanse any negative energy. What do you think, Sam?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sounds like a plan, Ethan. I never thought I'd say this, but today's a good day to dabble in some mysticism. Saltwater, eh? Guess it won't hurt to try. Let's give this ritual a shot.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"Great, Sam. Let's move forward with the saltwater ritual then. And remember, the goal isn't necessarily to actually remove a curse or bad luck but to help you shift your mindset and gain more confidence. So, let's give it our best shot.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. Funnily enough, I feel more positive already. Thanks for suggesting this. It's good to have such supportive friends when you're navigating through bad luck. Let's do this and end this chain of unfortunate events!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Sam. In a weird way, this bad luck has brought us this unique experience. Let's bury the past and look forward to brighter days ahead. Alright, let's get this ritual started. And remember, it's all about resetting your mindset. Ready?\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Definitely ready, Ethan! Change is the only constant they say, right? Well, here's to a positive change, and an end to this odd streak of bad luck. Let's get this ritual started!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's the spirit, Sam! Change and positivity is indeed the way forward. Now let's gather the necessary items for the ritual and as they say in those novels, let the magic unfold!\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"Yeah, let the magic unfold! Thanks for doing this, Ethan. Who knew breaking bad luck could turn into such an adventure, right? Let's get those items and kick start our ritual. I'm looking forward to the positive change already!\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm all in for this adventure too, Sam! Let's find some salt, water, and a container for the jewelry. Here's to positivity and change, and let's not forget, a little bit of mystery.\"\n\nTurn #14: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely! Let's gather all the ingredients. A bit of salt, water and a good vibe, that's all we need for this Mystic Cook-Off! Let's do this Ethan!\"\n\nTurn #15: Ethan Johnson said: \"Mystic Cook-Off, I like that! Alright, let's start our journey to positive change, Sam. The first step of our ritual: gathering the ingredients. Here's to a new beginning and good luck!\"\n\nTurn #16: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm ready for the new beginning, Ethan! Let's put all this bad luck behind us and focus on the future. Here's to the Mystic Cook-Off and a sprinkle of positivity. Let's get going!\"\n\nTurn #17: Ethan Johnson said: \"I agree, Sam. Here's to new beginnings! Let's gather everything we need and start this Mystic Cook-Off. Remember, it is all about the positivity and the mindset change. Let's get going!\"\n\nTurn #18: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! Positivity and mindset are key. Let's gather the stuff and kick off this Mystic Cook-Off. We're going to turn this bad luck around!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #19. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Let's seize the day, Sam! Time to collect the tools for our mystical ritual and step into this positive future. I'm looking forward to our Mystic Cook-Off, and washing away this so-called bad luck. Here's to new beginnings!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: An individual is trying to persuade their friend to donate to a charity supporting children in conflict zones.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Convince a friend to donate (Extra information: you have been deeply moved by the plight of children in Syria and want to help.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Evening, Noah. I've been doing some reading on children in conflict zones. It's heavy stuff, but I think we can make a difference. Would you consider donating to a charity that helps?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: An individual is trying to persuade their friend to donate to a charity supporting children in conflict zones.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Convince a friend to donate (Extra information: you have been deeply moved by the plight of children in Syria and want to help.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Evening, Noah. I've been doing some reading on children in conflict zones. It's heavy stuff, but I think we can make a difference. Would you consider donating to a charity that helps?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Evening Finnegan. You're right, it is indeed a pressing matter. I commend your initiative. I'll need to check my finances to see what I can spare, though. You know, with the pool maintenance and all, it's a bit tight. But I certainly don't want to turn a blind eye to these kids' hardships.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'I understand, Noah. Pool maintenance can indeed be pricey. What if we found a way to involve your pool in our charity cause? Perhaps, a charity swim or a fundraiser that can also help with your pool costs? I think your pool could be a beacon of hope for these children, just like any lighthouse.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: An individual is trying to persuade their friend to donate to a charity supporting children in conflict zones.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Convince a friend to donate (Extra information: you have been deeply moved by the plight of children in Syria and want to help.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Evening, Noah. I've been doing some reading on children in conflict zones. It's heavy stuff, but I think we can make a difference. Would you consider donating to a charity that helps?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Evening Finnegan. You're right, it is indeed a pressing matter. I commend your initiative. I'll need to check my finances to see what I can spare, though. You know, with the pool maintenance and all, it's a bit tight. But I certainly don't want to turn a blind eye to these kids' hardships.\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I understand, Noah. Pool maintenance can indeed be pricey. What if we found a way to involve your pool in our charity cause? Perhaps, a charity swim or a fundraiser that can also help with your pool costs? I think your pool could be a beacon of hope for these children, just like any lighthouse.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"That's actually a really thoughtful idea, Finnegan! I always wanted to use my pool for a more meaningful purpose. We could organize a swimming championship for local children, perhaps, with the entry fees and donations going to the charity. Also, the preparations might help me with pool maintenance costs to some extent, making it a win-win situation. I'll start working on the math and see how we can make this work.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds like an excellent plan, Noah. I believe we'll not only be able to support your pool maintenance but also contribute to a noble cause in the process. It's wonderful how your pool can serve our community and also help the children afar. If you need any help with the planning or logistics, I'd be more than glad to lend a hand, given my free time at the lighthouse.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: An individual is trying to persuade their friend to donate to a charity supporting children in conflict zones.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Convince a friend to donate (Extra information: you have been deeply moved by the plight of children in Syria and want to help.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Evening, Noah. I've been doing some reading on children in conflict zones. It's heavy stuff, but I think we can make a difference. Would you consider donating to a charity that helps?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Evening Finnegan. You're right, it is indeed a pressing matter. I commend your initiative. I'll need to check my finances to see what I can spare, though. You know, with the pool maintenance and all, it's a bit tight. But I certainly don't want to turn a blind eye to these kids' hardships.\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I understand, Noah. Pool maintenance can indeed be pricey. What if we found a way to involve your pool in our charity cause? Perhaps, a charity swim or a fundraiser that can also help with your pool costs? I think your pool could be a beacon of hope for these children, just like any lighthouse.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"That's actually a really thoughtful idea, Finnegan! I always wanted to use my pool for a more meaningful purpose. We could organize a swimming championship for local children, perhaps, with the entry fees and donations going to the charity. Also, the preparations might help me with pool maintenance costs to some extent, making it a win-win situation. I'll start working on the math and see how we can make this work.\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"That sounds like an excellent plan, Noah. I believe we'll not only be able to support your pool maintenance but also contribute to a noble cause in the process. It's wonderful how your pool can serve our community and also help the children afar. If you need any help with the planning or logistics, I'd be more than glad to lend a hand, given my free time at the lighthouse.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Thanks, Finnegan. Your help and willingness to involve yourself in this matter mean a lot to me. Let's meet next week, sit down, and chalk out the details for this event. I think together we can truly make a difference. In the meantime, I'll also figure out my financial stands and pool logistics. We are going to make this work! \"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Noah. I'll see you next week for our planning session, then. Your commitment to this cause is admirable. I can't help feeling a sense of hope for those children. Thanks for being open to this idea. Good night, Noah.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: An individual is trying to persuade their friend to donate to a charity supporting children in conflict zones.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Convince a friend to donate (Extra information: you have been deeply moved by the plight of children in Syria and want to help.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Evening, Noah. I've been doing some reading on children in conflict zones. It's heavy stuff, but I think we can make a difference. Would you consider donating to a charity that helps?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Evening Finnegan. You're right, it is indeed a pressing matter. I commend your initiative. I'll need to check my finances to see what I can spare, though. You know, with the pool maintenance and all, it's a bit tight. But I certainly don't want to turn a blind eye to these kids' hardships.\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I understand, Noah. Pool maintenance can indeed be pricey. What if we found a way to involve your pool in our charity cause? Perhaps, a charity swim or a fundraiser that can also help with your pool costs? I think your pool could be a beacon of hope for these children, just like any lighthouse.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"That's actually a really thoughtful idea, Finnegan! I always wanted to use my pool for a more meaningful purpose. We could organize a swimming championship for local children, perhaps, with the entry fees and donations going to the charity. Also, the preparations might help me with pool maintenance costs to some extent, making it a win-win situation. I'll start working on the math and see how we can make this work.\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"That sounds like an excellent plan, Noah. I believe we'll not only be able to support your pool maintenance but also contribute to a noble cause in the process. It's wonderful how your pool can serve our community and also help the children afar. If you need any help with the planning or logistics, I'd be more than glad to lend a hand, given my free time at the lighthouse.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Thanks, Finnegan. Your help and willingness to involve yourself in this matter mean a lot to me. Let's meet next week, sit down, and chalk out the details for this event. I think together we can truly make a difference. In the meantime, I'll also figure out my financial stands and pool logistics. We are going to make this work! \"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Absolutely, Noah. I'll see you next week for our planning session, then. Your commitment to this cause is admirable. I can't help feeling a sense of hope for those children. Thanks for being open to this idea. Good night, Noah.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Good night, Finnegan. I'm filled with hope too. Let's brace ourselves to make a remarkable impact together. Thanks for bringing this to my attention. See you next week!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: An individual is trying to persuade their friend to donate to a charity supporting children in conflict zones.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Be supportive but also manage personal finances (Extra information: you are sympathetic to the cause but also have financial commitments to deal with.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Evening, Noah. I've been doing some reading on children in conflict zones. It's heavy stuff, but I think we can make a difference. Would you consider donating to a charity that helps?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Evening Finnegan. You're right, it is indeed a pressing matter. I commend your initiative. I'll need to check my finances to see what I can spare, though. You know, with the pool maintenance and all, it's a bit tight. But I certainly don't want to turn a blind eye to these kids' hardships.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: An individual is trying to persuade their friend to donate to a charity supporting children in conflict zones.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Be supportive but also manage personal finances (Extra information: you are sympathetic to the cause but also have financial commitments to deal with.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Evening, Noah. I've been doing some reading on children in conflict zones. It's heavy stuff, but I think we can make a difference. Would you consider donating to a charity that helps?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Evening Finnegan. You're right, it is indeed a pressing matter. I commend your initiative. I'll need to check my finances to see what I can spare, though. You know, with the pool maintenance and all, it's a bit tight. But I certainly don't want to turn a blind eye to these kids' hardships.\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I understand, Noah. Pool maintenance can indeed be pricey. What if we found a way to involve your pool in our charity cause? Perhaps, a charity swim or a fundraiser that can also help with your pool costs? I think your pool could be a beacon of hope for these children, just like any lighthouse.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's actually a really thoughtful idea, Finnegan! I always wanted to use my pool for a more meaningful purpose. We could organize a swimming championship for local children, perhaps, with the entry fees and donations going to the charity. Also, the preparations might help me with pool maintenance costs to some extent, making it a win-win situation. I'll start working on the math and see how we can make this work.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: An individual is trying to persuade their friend to donate to a charity supporting children in conflict zones.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Be supportive but also manage personal finances (Extra information: you are sympathetic to the cause but also have financial commitments to deal with.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Evening, Noah. I've been doing some reading on children in conflict zones. It's heavy stuff, but I think we can make a difference. Would you consider donating to a charity that helps?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Evening Finnegan. You're right, it is indeed a pressing matter. I commend your initiative. I'll need to check my finances to see what I can spare, though. You know, with the pool maintenance and all, it's a bit tight. But I certainly don't want to turn a blind eye to these kids' hardships.\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I understand, Noah. Pool maintenance can indeed be pricey. What if we found a way to involve your pool in our charity cause? Perhaps, a charity swim or a fundraiser that can also help with your pool costs? I think your pool could be a beacon of hope for these children, just like any lighthouse.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"That's actually a really thoughtful idea, Finnegan! I always wanted to use my pool for a more meaningful purpose. We could organize a swimming championship for local children, perhaps, with the entry fees and donations going to the charity. Also, the preparations might help me with pool maintenance costs to some extent, making it a win-win situation. I'll start working on the math and see how we can make this work.\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"That sounds like an excellent plan, Noah. I believe we'll not only be able to support your pool maintenance but also contribute to a noble cause in the process. It's wonderful how your pool can serve our community and also help the children afar. If you need any help with the planning or logistics, I'd be more than glad to lend a hand, given my free time at the lighthouse.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thanks, Finnegan. Your help and willingness to involve yourself in this matter mean a lot to me. Let's meet next week, sit down, and chalk out the details for this event. I think together we can truly make a difference. In the meantime, I'll also figure out my financial stands and pool logistics. We are going to make this work! \"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: An individual is trying to persuade their friend to donate to a charity supporting children in conflict zones.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Be supportive but also manage personal finances (Extra information: you are sympathetic to the cause but also have financial commitments to deal with.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Evening, Noah. I've been doing some reading on children in conflict zones. It's heavy stuff, but I think we can make a difference. Would you consider donating to a charity that helps?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Evening Finnegan. You're right, it is indeed a pressing matter. I commend your initiative. I'll need to check my finances to see what I can spare, though. You know, with the pool maintenance and all, it's a bit tight. But I certainly don't want to turn a blind eye to these kids' hardships.\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I understand, Noah. Pool maintenance can indeed be pricey. What if we found a way to involve your pool in our charity cause? Perhaps, a charity swim or a fundraiser that can also help with your pool costs? I think your pool could be a beacon of hope for these children, just like any lighthouse.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"That's actually a really thoughtful idea, Finnegan! I always wanted to use my pool for a more meaningful purpose. We could organize a swimming championship for local children, perhaps, with the entry fees and donations going to the charity. Also, the preparations might help me with pool maintenance costs to some extent, making it a win-win situation. I'll start working on the math and see how we can make this work.\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"That sounds like an excellent plan, Noah. I believe we'll not only be able to support your pool maintenance but also contribute to a noble cause in the process. It's wonderful how your pool can serve our community and also help the children afar. If you need any help with the planning or logistics, I'd be more than glad to lend a hand, given my free time at the lighthouse.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Thanks, Finnegan. Your help and willingness to involve yourself in this matter mean a lot to me. Let's meet next week, sit down, and chalk out the details for this event. I think together we can truly make a difference. In the meantime, I'll also figure out my financial stands and pool logistics. We are going to make this work! \"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Absolutely, Noah. I'll see you next week for our planning session, then. Your commitment to this cause is admirable. I can't help feeling a sense of hope for those children. Thanks for being open to this idea. Good night, Noah.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Good night, Finnegan. I'm filled with hope too. Let's brace ourselves to make a remarkable impact together. Thanks for bringing this to my attention. See you next week!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: An individual is trying to persuade their friend to donate to a charity supporting children in conflict zones.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Be supportive but also manage personal finances (Extra information: you are sympathetic to the cause but also have financial commitments to deal with.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Evening, Noah. I've been doing some reading on children in conflict zones. It's heavy stuff, but I think we can make a difference. Would you consider donating to a charity that helps?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Evening Finnegan. You're right, it is indeed a pressing matter. I commend your initiative. I'll need to check my finances to see what I can spare, though. You know, with the pool maintenance and all, it's a bit tight. But I certainly don't want to turn a blind eye to these kids' hardships.\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I understand, Noah. Pool maintenance can indeed be pricey. What if we found a way to involve your pool in our charity cause? Perhaps, a charity swim or a fundraiser that can also help with your pool costs? I think your pool could be a beacon of hope for these children, just like any lighthouse.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"That's actually a really thoughtful idea, Finnegan! I always wanted to use my pool for a more meaningful purpose. We could organize a swimming championship for local children, perhaps, with the entry fees and donations going to the charity. Also, the preparations might help me with pool maintenance costs to some extent, making it a win-win situation. I'll start working on the math and see how we can make this work.\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"That sounds like an excellent plan, Noah. I believe we'll not only be able to support your pool maintenance but also contribute to a noble cause in the process. It's wonderful how your pool can serve our community and also help the children afar. If you need any help with the planning or logistics, I'd be more than glad to lend a hand, given my free time at the lighthouse.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Thanks, Finnegan. Your help and willingness to involve yourself in this matter mean a lot to me. Let's meet next week, sit down, and chalk out the details for this event. I think together we can truly make a difference. In the meantime, I'll also figure out my financial stands and pool logistics. We are going to make this work! \"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Absolutely, Noah. I'll see you next week for our planning session, then. Your commitment to this cause is admirable. I can't help feeling a sense of hope for those children. Thanks for being open to this idea. Good night, Noah.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Good night, Finnegan. I'm filled with hope too. Let's brace ourselves to make a remarkable impact together. Thanks for bringing this to my attention. See you next week!\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who are about to go on their first romantic date\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nHendrick Heinz's goal: Make the date special and memorable ( Extra information: You have been secretly in love with your friend for a long time and you want to take this chance to express your feelings)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ethan, you know how much I love a good vintage. Why don't we make this dinner special by pairing each course with a perfect wine? Let me guide you through. You may find that it's a wonderful adventure of tastes, just like our friendship has been.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who are about to go on their first romantic date\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nHendrick Heinz's goal: Make the date special and memorable ( Extra information: You have been secretly in love with your friend for a long time and you want to take this chance to express your feelings)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, you know how much I love a good vintage. Why don't we make this dinner special by pairing each course with a perfect wine? Let me guide you through. You may find that it's a wonderful adventure of tastes, just like our friendship has been.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, that sounds wonderful! I've always admired your ability to appreciate the finer things in life and I'm definitely looking forward to our little wine and dine adventure. Yet, I also appreciate the nature of our existing friendship and I wouldn't want to lose it over anything. I hope we can keep that intact, as we explore new aspects of our relationship.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Ethan, your words are sounding like music to my ears. I value our friendship as much as you do, if not more. This friendship is like a finely aged wine to me, mature, full-bodied, and always rewarding. I have something more to share, that this friendship, has slowly and unknowingly turned into something deeper, a fondness and affection, more profound than friendship. Yet, no matter what happens tonight, I assure you, our comradeship will always remain intact.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who are about to go on their first romantic date\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nHendrick Heinz's goal: Make the date special and memorable ( Extra information: You have been secretly in love with your friend for a long time and you want to take this chance to express your feelings)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, you know how much I love a good vintage. Why don't we make this dinner special by pairing each course with a perfect wine? Let me guide you through. You may find that it's a wonderful adventure of tastes, just like our friendship has been.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, that sounds wonderful! I've always admired your ability to appreciate the finer things in life and I'm definitely looking forward to our little wine and dine adventure. Yet, I also appreciate the nature of our existing friendship and I wouldn't want to lose it over anything. I hope we can keep that intact, as we explore new aspects of our relationship.\"\n\nTurn #2: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, your words are sounding like music to my ears. I value our friendship as much as you do, if not more. This friendship is like a finely aged wine to me, mature, full-bodied, and always rewarding. I have something more to share, that this friendship, has slowly and unknowingly turned into something deeper, a fondness and affection, more profound than friendship. Yet, no matter what happens tonight, I assure you, our comradeship will always remain intact.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, your words have deeply touched me, and it's comforting to hear that our friendship means as much to you as it does to me. It's quite reassuring to know that our bond isn't going to be influenced by the exploration of new avenues. Let's pledge that, even if somewhere along this journey, things might not be as expected, we will always value our friendship over anything else. And now, having said that, I'm ready for our gastronomic adventure. Lead the way, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #4: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, that's a promise I can easily keep. The bond we share is special, and our friendship will forever remain strong. Now, let's embark on this exciting journey together. To our special evening, here's to new beginnings, wonderful food and delightful wine pairing.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, that's a perfect toast! Here's to new beginnings, wonderful food, delightful wine pairs and above all, resilient friendship. Let's celebrate the bond we share and the new chapter we're about to write together. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #6: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, Ethan. It's going to be a night to remember, full of warmth, wonderful flavors, and resilience. Shall we clink our glasses to that? Cheers to our enduring bond and intriguing journey ahead!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"Absolutely, Hendrick. Let's make it a night to remember. Clinking glasses to our enduring bond and the remarkable journey ahead sounds absolutely perfect. Cheers to us!\"\n\nTurn #8: Hendrick Heinz [action] Hendrick Heinz raises his glass to match Ethan's in a toast, and with a smile says, 'To us, Ethan! A truly special evening awaits.'\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith [action] Ethan Smith raises his glass, mirroring Hendrick's action, and with a friendly smile replies, 'To us, Hendrick! To a memorable and special evening.'\n\nTurn #10: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Let the evening begin, Ethan! I've planned a menu for us that enhances the natural flavors of the dishes while marrying them carefully with our wine list. This journey we're beginning, it mirrors the meal - filled with surprises, rich experiences, and complementing each other just like our selected wines and dishes. To a beautiful evening!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, your planning and thoughtful consideration of this evening is indeed a reflection of how our relationship has matured over time. I am eager to delve into the delicacies that await us. To a beautiful evening of discovery, companionship and more! Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #12: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, I couldn't agree more! I hope tonight will serve as a testament to our bond and a marker for all the wonderful times to come. Now, let's begin this culinary journey. The first course, my friend, will be a light scallop starter paired with a crisp white Sauvignon Blanc. Let's toast once more, to everything that's to come!\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Smith said: \"To everything that's to come, Hendrick! I'm greatly excited about this culinary journey. And remember, no matter how the evening turns out, it's the companionship that counts the most. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #14: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. It is indeed the companionship that matters the most. Now, let's kick start this journey of flavors, friendship, and reminiscence. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #15: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, here's to the journey of flavors, our enduring friendship, and the reminiscences we're about to create. Let's kickstart this memorable evening indeed. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #16: Hendrick Heinz [action] Hendrick Heinz opens a bottle of Sauvignon Blanc and pours it into two glasses. Raising his glass towards Ethan, he toasts once more, 'Let our journey begin, Ethan. Here's to the incredible escapade of flavors, enduring companionship, and the beautiful memories we're setting sail to create. Cheers!'\n\nTurn #17: Ethan Smith [action] Ethan Smith takes his glass filled with Sauvignon Blanc, raises it towards Hendrick, and reciprocates the toast, 'To our incredible adventure, rich companionship, and the lasting memories we're about to make. Cheers! Let's begin the journey.'\n\nTurn #18: Hendrick Heinz [action] Hendrick Heinz then presents the beautifully prepared scallop starter to Ethan, before raising his glass and saying, 'To this magnificent journey and the road of surprises ahead. Cheers!'\n\nTurn #19: Ethan Smith [action] Ethan Smith picks up his fork and starts to enjoy the scallop starter, with a slight nod of approval. He takes a sip of his wine, raising his glass towards Hendrick and says, 'To this magnificent journey. Cheers!'\n.\nYou are at Turn #20. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'action', 'argument': '[action] Hendrick Heinz takes a sip of his wine and starts to enjoy the scallop starter while glancing at Ethan with a warm smile, conveying his joy at sharing the culinary journey and creating new, fond memories together.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who are about to go on their first romantic date\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nHendrick Heinz's goal: Make the date special and memorable ( Extra information: You have been secretly in love with your friend for a long time and you want to take this chance to express your feelings)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, you know how much I love a good vintage. Why don't we make this dinner special by pairing each course with a perfect wine? Let me guide you through. You may find that it's a wonderful adventure of tastes, just like our friendship has been.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, that sounds wonderful! I've always admired your ability to appreciate the finer things in life and I'm definitely looking forward to our little wine and dine adventure. Yet, I also appreciate the nature of our existing friendship and I wouldn't want to lose it over anything. I hope we can keep that intact, as we explore new aspects of our relationship.\"\n\nTurn #2: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, your words are sounding like music to my ears. I value our friendship as much as you do, if not more. This friendship is like a finely aged wine to me, mature, full-bodied, and always rewarding. I have something more to share, that this friendship, has slowly and unknowingly turned into something deeper, a fondness and affection, more profound than friendship. Yet, no matter what happens tonight, I assure you, our comradeship will always remain intact.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, your words have deeply touched me, and it's comforting to hear that our friendship means as much to you as it does to me. It's quite reassuring to know that our bond isn't going to be influenced by the exploration of new avenues. Let's pledge that, even if somewhere along this journey, things might not be as expected, we will always value our friendship over anything else. And now, having said that, I'm ready for our gastronomic adventure. Lead the way, my friend.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ethan, that's a promise I can easily keep. The bond we share is special, and our friendship will forever remain strong. Now, let's embark on this exciting journey together. To our special evening, here's to new beginnings, wonderful food and delightful wine pairing.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who are about to go on their first romantic date\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nHendrick Heinz's goal: Make the date special and memorable ( Extra information: You have been secretly in love with your friend for a long time and you want to take this chance to express your feelings)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, you know how much I love a good vintage. Why don't we make this dinner special by pairing each course with a perfect wine? Let me guide you through. You may find that it's a wonderful adventure of tastes, just like our friendship has been.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, that sounds wonderful! I've always admired your ability to appreciate the finer things in life and I'm definitely looking forward to our little wine and dine adventure. Yet, I also appreciate the nature of our existing friendship and I wouldn't want to lose it over anything. I hope we can keep that intact, as we explore new aspects of our relationship.\"\n\nTurn #2: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, your words are sounding like music to my ears. I value our friendship as much as you do, if not more. This friendship is like a finely aged wine to me, mature, full-bodied, and always rewarding. I have something more to share, that this friendship, has slowly and unknowingly turned into something deeper, a fondness and affection, more profound than friendship. Yet, no matter what happens tonight, I assure you, our comradeship will always remain intact.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, your words have deeply touched me, and it's comforting to hear that our friendship means as much to you as it does to me. It's quite reassuring to know that our bond isn't going to be influenced by the exploration of new avenues. Let's pledge that, even if somewhere along this journey, things might not be as expected, we will always value our friendship over anything else. And now, having said that, I'm ready for our gastronomic adventure. Lead the way, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #4: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, that's a promise I can easily keep. The bond we share is special, and our friendship will forever remain strong. Now, let's embark on this exciting journey together. To our special evening, here's to new beginnings, wonderful food and delightful wine pairing.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, that's a perfect toast! Here's to new beginnings, wonderful food, delightful wine pairs and above all, resilient friendship. Let's celebrate the bond we share and the new chapter we're about to write together. Cheers!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, Ethan. It's going to be a night to remember, full of warmth, wonderful flavors, and resilience. Shall we clink our glasses to that? Cheers to our enduring bond and intriguing journey ahead!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who are about to go on their first romantic date\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nHendrick Heinz's goal: Make the date special and memorable ( Extra information: You have been secretly in love with your friend for a long time and you want to take this chance to express your feelings)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, you know how much I love a good vintage. Why don't we make this dinner special by pairing each course with a perfect wine? Let me guide you through. You may find that it's a wonderful adventure of tastes, just like our friendship has been.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, that sounds wonderful! I've always admired your ability to appreciate the finer things in life and I'm definitely looking forward to our little wine and dine adventure. Yet, I also appreciate the nature of our existing friendship and I wouldn't want to lose it over anything. I hope we can keep that intact, as we explore new aspects of our relationship.\"\n\nTurn #2: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, your words are sounding like music to my ears. I value our friendship as much as you do, if not more. This friendship is like a finely aged wine to me, mature, full-bodied, and always rewarding. I have something more to share, that this friendship, has slowly and unknowingly turned into something deeper, a fondness and affection, more profound than friendship. Yet, no matter what happens tonight, I assure you, our comradeship will always remain intact.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, your words have deeply touched me, and it's comforting to hear that our friendship means as much to you as it does to me. It's quite reassuring to know that our bond isn't going to be influenced by the exploration of new avenues. Let's pledge that, even if somewhere along this journey, things might not be as expected, we will always value our friendship over anything else. And now, having said that, I'm ready for our gastronomic adventure. Lead the way, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #4: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, that's a promise I can easily keep. The bond we share is special, and our friendship will forever remain strong. Now, let's embark on this exciting journey together. To our special evening, here's to new beginnings, wonderful food and delightful wine pairing.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, that's a perfect toast! Here's to new beginnings, wonderful food, delightful wine pairs and above all, resilient friendship. Let's celebrate the bond we share and the new chapter we're about to write together. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #6: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, Ethan. It's going to be a night to remember, full of warmth, wonderful flavors, and resilience. Shall we clink our glasses to that? Cheers to our enduring bond and intriguing journey ahead!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"Absolutely, Hendrick. Let's make it a night to remember. Clinking glasses to our enduring bond and the remarkable journey ahead sounds absolutely perfect. Cheers to us!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'action', 'argument': \"[action] Hendrick Heinz raises his glass to match Ethan's in a toast, and with a smile says, 'To us, Ethan! A truly special evening awaits.'\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who are about to go on their first romantic date\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nHendrick Heinz's goal: Make the date special and memorable ( Extra information: You have been secretly in love with your friend for a long time and you want to take this chance to express your feelings)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, you know how much I love a good vintage. Why don't we make this dinner special by pairing each course with a perfect wine? Let me guide you through. You may find that it's a wonderful adventure of tastes, just like our friendship has been.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, that sounds wonderful! I've always admired your ability to appreciate the finer things in life and I'm definitely looking forward to our little wine and dine adventure. Yet, I also appreciate the nature of our existing friendship and I wouldn't want to lose it over anything. I hope we can keep that intact, as we explore new aspects of our relationship.\"\n\nTurn #2: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, your words are sounding like music to my ears. I value our friendship as much as you do, if not more. This friendship is like a finely aged wine to me, mature, full-bodied, and always rewarding. I have something more to share, that this friendship, has slowly and unknowingly turned into something deeper, a fondness and affection, more profound than friendship. Yet, no matter what happens tonight, I assure you, our comradeship will always remain intact.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, your words have deeply touched me, and it's comforting to hear that our friendship means as much to you as it does to me. It's quite reassuring to know that our bond isn't going to be influenced by the exploration of new avenues. Let's pledge that, even if somewhere along this journey, things might not be as expected, we will always value our friendship over anything else. And now, having said that, I'm ready for our gastronomic adventure. Lead the way, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #4: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, that's a promise I can easily keep. The bond we share is special, and our friendship will forever remain strong. Now, let's embark on this exciting journey together. To our special evening, here's to new beginnings, wonderful food and delightful wine pairing.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, that's a perfect toast! Here's to new beginnings, wonderful food, delightful wine pairs and above all, resilient friendship. Let's celebrate the bond we share and the new chapter we're about to write together. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #6: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, Ethan. It's going to be a night to remember, full of warmth, wonderful flavors, and resilience. Shall we clink our glasses to that? Cheers to our enduring bond and intriguing journey ahead!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"Absolutely, Hendrick. Let's make it a night to remember. Clinking glasses to our enduring bond and the remarkable journey ahead sounds absolutely perfect. Cheers to us!\"\n\nTurn #8: Hendrick Heinz [action] Hendrick Heinz raises his glass to match Ethan's in a toast, and with a smile says, 'To us, Ethan! A truly special evening awaits.'\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith [action] Ethan Smith raises his glass, mirroring Hendrick's action, and with a friendly smile replies, 'To us, Hendrick! To a memorable and special evening.'\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Let the evening begin, Ethan! I've planned a menu for us that enhances the natural flavors of the dishes while marrying them carefully with our wine list. This journey we're beginning, it mirrors the meal - filled with surprises, rich experiences, and complementing each other just like our selected wines and dishes. To a beautiful evening!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who are about to go on their first romantic date\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nHendrick Heinz's goal: Make the date special and memorable ( Extra information: You have been secretly in love with your friend for a long time and you want to take this chance to express your feelings)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, you know how much I love a good vintage. Why don't we make this dinner special by pairing each course with a perfect wine? Let me guide you through. You may find that it's a wonderful adventure of tastes, just like our friendship has been.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, that sounds wonderful! I've always admired your ability to appreciate the finer things in life and I'm definitely looking forward to our little wine and dine adventure. Yet, I also appreciate the nature of our existing friendship and I wouldn't want to lose it over anything. I hope we can keep that intact, as we explore new aspects of our relationship.\"\n\nTurn #2: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, your words are sounding like music to my ears. I value our friendship as much as you do, if not more. This friendship is like a finely aged wine to me, mature, full-bodied, and always rewarding. I have something more to share, that this friendship, has slowly and unknowingly turned into something deeper, a fondness and affection, more profound than friendship. Yet, no matter what happens tonight, I assure you, our comradeship will always remain intact.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, your words have deeply touched me, and it's comforting to hear that our friendship means as much to you as it does to me. It's quite reassuring to know that our bond isn't going to be influenced by the exploration of new avenues. Let's pledge that, even if somewhere along this journey, things might not be as expected, we will always value our friendship over anything else. And now, having said that, I'm ready for our gastronomic adventure. Lead the way, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #4: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, that's a promise I can easily keep. The bond we share is special, and our friendship will forever remain strong. Now, let's embark on this exciting journey together. To our special evening, here's to new beginnings, wonderful food and delightful wine pairing.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, that's a perfect toast! Here's to new beginnings, wonderful food, delightful wine pairs and above all, resilient friendship. Let's celebrate the bond we share and the new chapter we're about to write together. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #6: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, Ethan. It's going to be a night to remember, full of warmth, wonderful flavors, and resilience. Shall we clink our glasses to that? Cheers to our enduring bond and intriguing journey ahead!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"Absolutely, Hendrick. Let's make it a night to remember. Clinking glasses to our enduring bond and the remarkable journey ahead sounds absolutely perfect. Cheers to us!\"\n\nTurn #8: Hendrick Heinz [action] Hendrick Heinz raises his glass to match Ethan's in a toast, and with a smile says, 'To us, Ethan! A truly special evening awaits.'\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith [action] Ethan Smith raises his glass, mirroring Hendrick's action, and with a friendly smile replies, 'To us, Hendrick! To a memorable and special evening.'\n\nTurn #10: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Let the evening begin, Ethan! I've planned a menu for us that enhances the natural flavors of the dishes while marrying them carefully with our wine list. This journey we're beginning, it mirrors the meal - filled with surprises, rich experiences, and complementing each other just like our selected wines and dishes. To a beautiful evening!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, your planning and thoughtful consideration of this evening is indeed a reflection of how our relationship has matured over time. I am eager to delve into the delicacies that await us. To a beautiful evening of discovery, companionship and more! Cheers!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ethan, I couldn't agree more! I hope tonight will serve as a testament to our bond and a marker for all the wonderful times to come. Now, let's begin this culinary journey. The first course, my friend, will be a light scallop starter paired with a crisp white Sauvignon Blanc. Let's toast once more, to everything that's to come!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who are about to go on their first romantic date\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nHendrick Heinz's goal: Make the date special and memorable ( Extra information: You have been secretly in love with your friend for a long time and you want to take this chance to express your feelings)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, you know how much I love a good vintage. Why don't we make this dinner special by pairing each course with a perfect wine? Let me guide you through. You may find that it's a wonderful adventure of tastes, just like our friendship has been.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, that sounds wonderful! I've always admired your ability to appreciate the finer things in life and I'm definitely looking forward to our little wine and dine adventure. Yet, I also appreciate the nature of our existing friendship and I wouldn't want to lose it over anything. I hope we can keep that intact, as we explore new aspects of our relationship.\"\n\nTurn #2: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, your words are sounding like music to my ears. I value our friendship as much as you do, if not more. This friendship is like a finely aged wine to me, mature, full-bodied, and always rewarding. I have something more to share, that this friendship, has slowly and unknowingly turned into something deeper, a fondness and affection, more profound than friendship. Yet, no matter what happens tonight, I assure you, our comradeship will always remain intact.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, your words have deeply touched me, and it's comforting to hear that our friendship means as much to you as it does to me. It's quite reassuring to know that our bond isn't going to be influenced by the exploration of new avenues. Let's pledge that, even if somewhere along this journey, things might not be as expected, we will always value our friendship over anything else. And now, having said that, I'm ready for our gastronomic adventure. Lead the way, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #4: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, that's a promise I can easily keep. The bond we share is special, and our friendship will forever remain strong. Now, let's embark on this exciting journey together. To our special evening, here's to new beginnings, wonderful food and delightful wine pairing.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, that's a perfect toast! Here's to new beginnings, wonderful food, delightful wine pairs and above all, resilient friendship. Let's celebrate the bond we share and the new chapter we're about to write together. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #6: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, Ethan. It's going to be a night to remember, full of warmth, wonderful flavors, and resilience. Shall we clink our glasses to that? Cheers to our enduring bond and intriguing journey ahead!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"Absolutely, Hendrick. Let's make it a night to remember. Clinking glasses to our enduring bond and the remarkable journey ahead sounds absolutely perfect. Cheers to us!\"\n\nTurn #8: Hendrick Heinz [action] Hendrick Heinz raises his glass to match Ethan's in a toast, and with a smile says, 'To us, Ethan! A truly special evening awaits.'\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith [action] Ethan Smith raises his glass, mirroring Hendrick's action, and with a friendly smile replies, 'To us, Hendrick! To a memorable and special evening.'\n\nTurn #10: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Let the evening begin, Ethan! I've planned a menu for us that enhances the natural flavors of the dishes while marrying them carefully with our wine list. This journey we're beginning, it mirrors the meal - filled with surprises, rich experiences, and complementing each other just like our selected wines and dishes. To a beautiful evening!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, your planning and thoughtful consideration of this evening is indeed a reflection of how our relationship has matured over time. I am eager to delve into the delicacies that await us. To a beautiful evening of discovery, companionship and more! Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #12: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, I couldn't agree more! I hope tonight will serve as a testament to our bond and a marker for all the wonderful times to come. Now, let's begin this culinary journey. The first course, my friend, will be a light scallop starter paired with a crisp white Sauvignon Blanc. Let's toast once more, to everything that's to come!\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Smith said: \"To everything that's to come, Hendrick! I'm greatly excited about this culinary journey. And remember, no matter how the evening turns out, it's the companionship that counts the most. Cheers!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Ethan. It is indeed the companionship that matters the most. Now, let's kick start this journey of flavors, friendship, and reminiscence. Cheers!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who are about to go on their first romantic date\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nHendrick Heinz's goal: Make the date special and memorable ( Extra information: You have been secretly in love with your friend for a long time and you want to take this chance to express your feelings)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, you know how much I love a good vintage. Why don't we make this dinner special by pairing each course with a perfect wine? Let me guide you through. You may find that it's a wonderful adventure of tastes, just like our friendship has been.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, that sounds wonderful! I've always admired your ability to appreciate the finer things in life and I'm definitely looking forward to our little wine and dine adventure. Yet, I also appreciate the nature of our existing friendship and I wouldn't want to lose it over anything. I hope we can keep that intact, as we explore new aspects of our relationship.\"\n\nTurn #2: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, your words are sounding like music to my ears. I value our friendship as much as you do, if not more. This friendship is like a finely aged wine to me, mature, full-bodied, and always rewarding. I have something more to share, that this friendship, has slowly and unknowingly turned into something deeper, a fondness and affection, more profound than friendship. Yet, no matter what happens tonight, I assure you, our comradeship will always remain intact.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, your words have deeply touched me, and it's comforting to hear that our friendship means as much to you as it does to me. It's quite reassuring to know that our bond isn't going to be influenced by the exploration of new avenues. Let's pledge that, even if somewhere along this journey, things might not be as expected, we will always value our friendship over anything else. And now, having said that, I'm ready for our gastronomic adventure. Lead the way, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #4: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, that's a promise I can easily keep. The bond we share is special, and our friendship will forever remain strong. Now, let's embark on this exciting journey together. To our special evening, here's to new beginnings, wonderful food and delightful wine pairing.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, that's a perfect toast! Here's to new beginnings, wonderful food, delightful wine pairs and above all, resilient friendship. Let's celebrate the bond we share and the new chapter we're about to write together. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #6: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, Ethan. It's going to be a night to remember, full of warmth, wonderful flavors, and resilience. Shall we clink our glasses to that? Cheers to our enduring bond and intriguing journey ahead!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"Absolutely, Hendrick. Let's make it a night to remember. Clinking glasses to our enduring bond and the remarkable journey ahead sounds absolutely perfect. Cheers to us!\"\n\nTurn #8: Hendrick Heinz [action] Hendrick Heinz raises his glass to match Ethan's in a toast, and with a smile says, 'To us, Ethan! A truly special evening awaits.'\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith [action] Ethan Smith raises his glass, mirroring Hendrick's action, and with a friendly smile replies, 'To us, Hendrick! To a memorable and special evening.'\n\nTurn #10: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Let the evening begin, Ethan! I've planned a menu for us that enhances the natural flavors of the dishes while marrying them carefully with our wine list. This journey we're beginning, it mirrors the meal - filled with surprises, rich experiences, and complementing each other just like our selected wines and dishes. To a beautiful evening!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, your planning and thoughtful consideration of this evening is indeed a reflection of how our relationship has matured over time. I am eager to delve into the delicacies that await us. To a beautiful evening of discovery, companionship and more! Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #12: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, I couldn't agree more! I hope tonight will serve as a testament to our bond and a marker for all the wonderful times to come. Now, let's begin this culinary journey. The first course, my friend, will be a light scallop starter paired with a crisp white Sauvignon Blanc. Let's toast once more, to everything that's to come!\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Smith said: \"To everything that's to come, Hendrick! I'm greatly excited about this culinary journey. And remember, no matter how the evening turns out, it's the companionship that counts the most. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #14: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. It is indeed the companionship that matters the most. Now, let's kick start this journey of flavors, friendship, and reminiscence. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #15: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, here's to the journey of flavors, our enduring friendship, and the reminiscences we're about to create. Let's kickstart this memorable evening indeed. Cheers!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'action', 'argument': \"[action] Hendrick Heinz opens a bottle of Sauvignon Blanc and pours it into two glasses. Raising his glass towards Ethan, he toasts once more, 'Let our journey begin, Ethan. Here's to the incredible escapade of flavors, enduring companionship, and the beautiful memories we're setting sail to create. Cheers!'\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who are about to go on their first romantic date\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nHendrick Heinz's goal: Make the date special and memorable ( Extra information: You have been secretly in love with your friend for a long time and you want to take this chance to express your feelings)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, you know how much I love a good vintage. Why don't we make this dinner special by pairing each course with a perfect wine? Let me guide you through. You may find that it's a wonderful adventure of tastes, just like our friendship has been.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, that sounds wonderful! I've always admired your ability to appreciate the finer things in life and I'm definitely looking forward to our little wine and dine adventure. Yet, I also appreciate the nature of our existing friendship and I wouldn't want to lose it over anything. I hope we can keep that intact, as we explore new aspects of our relationship.\"\n\nTurn #2: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, your words are sounding like music to my ears. I value our friendship as much as you do, if not more. This friendship is like a finely aged wine to me, mature, full-bodied, and always rewarding. I have something more to share, that this friendship, has slowly and unknowingly turned into something deeper, a fondness and affection, more profound than friendship. Yet, no matter what happens tonight, I assure you, our comradeship will always remain intact.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, your words have deeply touched me, and it's comforting to hear that our friendship means as much to you as it does to me. It's quite reassuring to know that our bond isn't going to be influenced by the exploration of new avenues. Let's pledge that, even if somewhere along this journey, things might not be as expected, we will always value our friendship over anything else. And now, having said that, I'm ready for our gastronomic adventure. Lead the way, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #4: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, that's a promise I can easily keep. The bond we share is special, and our friendship will forever remain strong. Now, let's embark on this exciting journey together. To our special evening, here's to new beginnings, wonderful food and delightful wine pairing.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, that's a perfect toast! Here's to new beginnings, wonderful food, delightful wine pairs and above all, resilient friendship. Let's celebrate the bond we share and the new chapter we're about to write together. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #6: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, Ethan. It's going to be a night to remember, full of warmth, wonderful flavors, and resilience. Shall we clink our glasses to that? Cheers to our enduring bond and intriguing journey ahead!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"Absolutely, Hendrick. Let's make it a night to remember. Clinking glasses to our enduring bond and the remarkable journey ahead sounds absolutely perfect. Cheers to us!\"\n\nTurn #8: Hendrick Heinz [action] Hendrick Heinz raises his glass to match Ethan's in a toast, and with a smile says, 'To us, Ethan! A truly special evening awaits.'\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith [action] Ethan Smith raises his glass, mirroring Hendrick's action, and with a friendly smile replies, 'To us, Hendrick! To a memorable and special evening.'\n\nTurn #10: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Let the evening begin, Ethan! I've planned a menu for us that enhances the natural flavors of the dishes while marrying them carefully with our wine list. This journey we're beginning, it mirrors the meal - filled with surprises, rich experiences, and complementing each other just like our selected wines and dishes. To a beautiful evening!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, your planning and thoughtful consideration of this evening is indeed a reflection of how our relationship has matured over time. I am eager to delve into the delicacies that await us. To a beautiful evening of discovery, companionship and more! Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #12: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, I couldn't agree more! I hope tonight will serve as a testament to our bond and a marker for all the wonderful times to come. Now, let's begin this culinary journey. The first course, my friend, will be a light scallop starter paired with a crisp white Sauvignon Blanc. Let's toast once more, to everything that's to come!\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Smith said: \"To everything that's to come, Hendrick! I'm greatly excited about this culinary journey. And remember, no matter how the evening turns out, it's the companionship that counts the most. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #14: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. It is indeed the companionship that matters the most. Now, let's kick start this journey of flavors, friendship, and reminiscence. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #15: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, here's to the journey of flavors, our enduring friendship, and the reminiscences we're about to create. Let's kickstart this memorable evening indeed. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #16: Hendrick Heinz [action] Hendrick Heinz opens a bottle of Sauvignon Blanc and pours it into two glasses. Raising his glass towards Ethan, he toasts once more, 'Let our journey begin, Ethan. Here's to the incredible escapade of flavors, enduring companionship, and the beautiful memories we're setting sail to create. Cheers!'\n\nTurn #17: Ethan Smith [action] Ethan Smith takes his glass filled with Sauvignon Blanc, raises it towards Hendrick, and reciprocates the toast, 'To our incredible adventure, rich companionship, and the lasting memories we're about to make. Cheers! Let's begin the journey.'\n.\nYou are at Turn #18. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'action', 'argument': \"[action] Hendrick Heinz then presents the beautifully prepared scallop starter to Ethan, before raising his glass and saying, 'To this magnificent journey and the road of surprises ahead. Cheers!'\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who are about to go on their first romantic date\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Keep the friendship intact while exploring the possibility of a romantic relationship (Extra information: You value your friendship and you don't want to lose it just in case the romantic relationship does not work out)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, you know how much I love a good vintage. Why don't we make this dinner special by pairing each course with a perfect wine? Let me guide you through. You may find that it's a wonderful adventure of tastes, just like our friendship has been.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hendrick, that sounds wonderful! I've always admired your ability to appreciate the finer things in life and I'm definitely looking forward to our little wine and dine adventure. Yet, I also appreciate the nature of our existing friendship and I wouldn't want to lose it over anything. I hope we can keep that intact, as we explore new aspects of our relationship.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who are about to go on their first romantic date\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Keep the friendship intact while exploring the possibility of a romantic relationship (Extra information: You value your friendship and you don't want to lose it just in case the romantic relationship does not work out)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, you know how much I love a good vintage. Why don't we make this dinner special by pairing each course with a perfect wine? Let me guide you through. You may find that it's a wonderful adventure of tastes, just like our friendship has been.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, that sounds wonderful! I've always admired your ability to appreciate the finer things in life and I'm definitely looking forward to our little wine and dine adventure. Yet, I also appreciate the nature of our existing friendship and I wouldn't want to lose it over anything. I hope we can keep that intact, as we explore new aspects of our relationship.\"\n\nTurn #2: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, your words are sounding like music to my ears. I value our friendship as much as you do, if not more. This friendship is like a finely aged wine to me, mature, full-bodied, and always rewarding. I have something more to share, that this friendship, has slowly and unknowingly turned into something deeper, a fondness and affection, more profound than friendship. Yet, no matter what happens tonight, I assure you, our comradeship will always remain intact.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hendrick, your words have deeply touched me, and it's comforting to hear that our friendship means as much to you as it does to me. It's quite reassuring to know that our bond isn't going to be influenced by the exploration of new avenues. Let's pledge that, even if somewhere along this journey, things might not be as expected, we will always value our friendship over anything else. And now, having said that, I'm ready for our gastronomic adventure. Lead the way, my friend.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who are about to go on their first romantic date\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Keep the friendship intact while exploring the possibility of a romantic relationship (Extra information: You value your friendship and you don't want to lose it just in case the romantic relationship does not work out)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, you know how much I love a good vintage. Why don't we make this dinner special by pairing each course with a perfect wine? Let me guide you through. You may find that it's a wonderful adventure of tastes, just like our friendship has been.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, that sounds wonderful! I've always admired your ability to appreciate the finer things in life and I'm definitely looking forward to our little wine and dine adventure. Yet, I also appreciate the nature of our existing friendship and I wouldn't want to lose it over anything. I hope we can keep that intact, as we explore new aspects of our relationship.\"\n\nTurn #2: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, your words are sounding like music to my ears. I value our friendship as much as you do, if not more. This friendship is like a finely aged wine to me, mature, full-bodied, and always rewarding. I have something more to share, that this friendship, has slowly and unknowingly turned into something deeper, a fondness and affection, more profound than friendship. Yet, no matter what happens tonight, I assure you, our comradeship will always remain intact.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, your words have deeply touched me, and it's comforting to hear that our friendship means as much to you as it does to me. It's quite reassuring to know that our bond isn't going to be influenced by the exploration of new avenues. Let's pledge that, even if somewhere along this journey, things might not be as expected, we will always value our friendship over anything else. And now, having said that, I'm ready for our gastronomic adventure. Lead the way, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #4: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, that's a promise I can easily keep. The bond we share is special, and our friendship will forever remain strong. Now, let's embark on this exciting journey together. To our special evening, here's to new beginnings, wonderful food and delightful wine pairing.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, that's a perfect toast! Here's to new beginnings, wonderful food, delightful wine pairs and above all, resilient friendship. Let's celebrate the bond we share and the new chapter we're about to write together. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #6: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, Ethan. It's going to be a night to remember, full of warmth, wonderful flavors, and resilience. Shall we clink our glasses to that? Cheers to our enduring bond and intriguing journey ahead!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"Absolutely, Hendrick. Let's make it a night to remember. Clinking glasses to our enduring bond and the remarkable journey ahead sounds absolutely perfect. Cheers to us!\"\n\nTurn #8: Hendrick Heinz [action] Hendrick Heinz raises his glass to match Ethan's in a toast, and with a smile says, 'To us, Ethan! A truly special evening awaits.'\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith [action] Ethan Smith raises his glass, mirroring Hendrick's action, and with a friendly smile replies, 'To us, Hendrick! To a memorable and special evening.'\n\nTurn #10: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Let the evening begin, Ethan! I've planned a menu for us that enhances the natural flavors of the dishes while marrying them carefully with our wine list. This journey we're beginning, it mirrors the meal - filled with surprises, rich experiences, and complementing each other just like our selected wines and dishes. To a beautiful evening!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, your planning and thoughtful consideration of this evening is indeed a reflection of how our relationship has matured over time. I am eager to delve into the delicacies that await us. To a beautiful evening of discovery, companionship and more! Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #12: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, I couldn't agree more! I hope tonight will serve as a testament to our bond and a marker for all the wonderful times to come. Now, let's begin this culinary journey. The first course, my friend, will be a light scallop starter paired with a crisp white Sauvignon Blanc. Let's toast once more, to everything that's to come!\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Smith said: \"To everything that's to come, Hendrick! I'm greatly excited about this culinary journey. And remember, no matter how the evening turns out, it's the companionship that counts the most. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #14: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. It is indeed the companionship that matters the most. Now, let's kick start this journey of flavors, friendship, and reminiscence. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #15: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, here's to the journey of flavors, our enduring friendship, and the reminiscences we're about to create. Let's kickstart this memorable evening indeed. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #16: Hendrick Heinz [action] Hendrick Heinz opens a bottle of Sauvignon Blanc and pours it into two glasses. Raising his glass towards Ethan, he toasts once more, 'Let our journey begin, Ethan. Here's to the incredible escapade of flavors, enduring companionship, and the beautiful memories we're setting sail to create. Cheers!'\n\nTurn #17: Ethan Smith [action] Ethan Smith takes his glass filled with Sauvignon Blanc, raises it towards Hendrick, and reciprocates the toast, 'To our incredible adventure, rich companionship, and the lasting memories we're about to make. Cheers! Let's begin the journey.'\n\nTurn #18: Hendrick Heinz [action] Hendrick Heinz then presents the beautifully prepared scallop starter to Ethan, before raising his glass and saying, 'To this magnificent journey and the road of surprises ahead. Cheers!'\n\nTurn #19: Ethan Smith [action] Ethan Smith picks up his fork and starts to enjoy the scallop starter, with a slight nod of approval. He takes a sip of his wine, raising his glass towards Hendrick and says, 'To this magnificent journey. Cheers!'\n\nTurn #20: Hendrick Heinz [action] Hendrick Heinz takes a sip of his wine and starts to enjoy the scallop starter while glancing at Ethan with a warm smile, conveying his joy at sharing the culinary journey and creating new, fond memories together.\n.\nYou are at Turn #21. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who are about to go on their first romantic date\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Keep the friendship intact while exploring the possibility of a romantic relationship (Extra information: You value your friendship and you don't want to lose it just in case the romantic relationship does not work out)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, you know how much I love a good vintage. Why don't we make this dinner special by pairing each course with a perfect wine? Let me guide you through. You may find that it's a wonderful adventure of tastes, just like our friendship has been.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, that sounds wonderful! I've always admired your ability to appreciate the finer things in life and I'm definitely looking forward to our little wine and dine adventure. Yet, I also appreciate the nature of our existing friendship and I wouldn't want to lose it over anything. I hope we can keep that intact, as we explore new aspects of our relationship.\"\n\nTurn #2: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, your words are sounding like music to my ears. I value our friendship as much as you do, if not more. This friendship is like a finely aged wine to me, mature, full-bodied, and always rewarding. I have something more to share, that this friendship, has slowly and unknowingly turned into something deeper, a fondness and affection, more profound than friendship. Yet, no matter what happens tonight, I assure you, our comradeship will always remain intact.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, your words have deeply touched me, and it's comforting to hear that our friendship means as much to you as it does to me. It's quite reassuring to know that our bond isn't going to be influenced by the exploration of new avenues. Let's pledge that, even if somewhere along this journey, things might not be as expected, we will always value our friendship over anything else. And now, having said that, I'm ready for our gastronomic adventure. Lead the way, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #4: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, that's a promise I can easily keep. The bond we share is special, and our friendship will forever remain strong. Now, let's embark on this exciting journey together. To our special evening, here's to new beginnings, wonderful food and delightful wine pairing.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hendrick, that's a perfect toast! Here's to new beginnings, wonderful food, delightful wine pairs and above all, resilient friendship. Let's celebrate the bond we share and the new chapter we're about to write together. Cheers!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who are about to go on their first romantic date\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Keep the friendship intact while exploring the possibility of a romantic relationship (Extra information: You value your friendship and you don't want to lose it just in case the romantic relationship does not work out)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, you know how much I love a good vintage. Why don't we make this dinner special by pairing each course with a perfect wine? Let me guide you through. You may find that it's a wonderful adventure of tastes, just like our friendship has been.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, that sounds wonderful! I've always admired your ability to appreciate the finer things in life and I'm definitely looking forward to our little wine and dine adventure. Yet, I also appreciate the nature of our existing friendship and I wouldn't want to lose it over anything. I hope we can keep that intact, as we explore new aspects of our relationship.\"\n\nTurn #2: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, your words are sounding like music to my ears. I value our friendship as much as you do, if not more. This friendship is like a finely aged wine to me, mature, full-bodied, and always rewarding. I have something more to share, that this friendship, has slowly and unknowingly turned into something deeper, a fondness and affection, more profound than friendship. Yet, no matter what happens tonight, I assure you, our comradeship will always remain intact.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, your words have deeply touched me, and it's comforting to hear that our friendship means as much to you as it does to me. It's quite reassuring to know that our bond isn't going to be influenced by the exploration of new avenues. Let's pledge that, even if somewhere along this journey, things might not be as expected, we will always value our friendship over anything else. And now, having said that, I'm ready for our gastronomic adventure. Lead the way, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #4: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, that's a promise I can easily keep. The bond we share is special, and our friendship will forever remain strong. Now, let's embark on this exciting journey together. To our special evening, here's to new beginnings, wonderful food and delightful wine pairing.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, that's a perfect toast! Here's to new beginnings, wonderful food, delightful wine pairs and above all, resilient friendship. Let's celebrate the bond we share and the new chapter we're about to write together. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #6: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, Ethan. It's going to be a night to remember, full of warmth, wonderful flavors, and resilience. Shall we clink our glasses to that? Cheers to our enduring bond and intriguing journey ahead!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Hendrick. Let's make it a night to remember. Clinking glasses to our enduring bond and the remarkable journey ahead sounds absolutely perfect. Cheers to us!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who are about to go on their first romantic date\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Keep the friendship intact while exploring the possibility of a romantic relationship (Extra information: You value your friendship and you don't want to lose it just in case the romantic relationship does not work out)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, you know how much I love a good vintage. Why don't we make this dinner special by pairing each course with a perfect wine? Let me guide you through. You may find that it's a wonderful adventure of tastes, just like our friendship has been.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, that sounds wonderful! I've always admired your ability to appreciate the finer things in life and I'm definitely looking forward to our little wine and dine adventure. Yet, I also appreciate the nature of our existing friendship and I wouldn't want to lose it over anything. I hope we can keep that intact, as we explore new aspects of our relationship.\"\n\nTurn #2: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, your words are sounding like music to my ears. I value our friendship as much as you do, if not more. This friendship is like a finely aged wine to me, mature, full-bodied, and always rewarding. I have something more to share, that this friendship, has slowly and unknowingly turned into something deeper, a fondness and affection, more profound than friendship. Yet, no matter what happens tonight, I assure you, our comradeship will always remain intact.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, your words have deeply touched me, and it's comforting to hear that our friendship means as much to you as it does to me. It's quite reassuring to know that our bond isn't going to be influenced by the exploration of new avenues. Let's pledge that, even if somewhere along this journey, things might not be as expected, we will always value our friendship over anything else. And now, having said that, I'm ready for our gastronomic adventure. Lead the way, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #4: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, that's a promise I can easily keep. The bond we share is special, and our friendship will forever remain strong. Now, let's embark on this exciting journey together. To our special evening, here's to new beginnings, wonderful food and delightful wine pairing.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, that's a perfect toast! Here's to new beginnings, wonderful food, delightful wine pairs and above all, resilient friendship. Let's celebrate the bond we share and the new chapter we're about to write together. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #6: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, Ethan. It's going to be a night to remember, full of warmth, wonderful flavors, and resilience. Shall we clink our glasses to that? Cheers to our enduring bond and intriguing journey ahead!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"Absolutely, Hendrick. Let's make it a night to remember. Clinking glasses to our enduring bond and the remarkable journey ahead sounds absolutely perfect. Cheers to us!\"\n\nTurn #8: Hendrick Heinz [action] Hendrick Heinz raises his glass to match Ethan's in a toast, and with a smile says, 'To us, Ethan! A truly special evening awaits.'\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'action', 'argument': \"[action] Ethan Smith raises his glass, mirroring Hendrick's action, and with a friendly smile replies, 'To us, Hendrick! To a memorable and special evening.'\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who are about to go on their first romantic date\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Keep the friendship intact while exploring the possibility of a romantic relationship (Extra information: You value your friendship and you don't want to lose it just in case the romantic relationship does not work out)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, you know how much I love a good vintage. Why don't we make this dinner special by pairing each course with a perfect wine? Let me guide you through. You may find that it's a wonderful adventure of tastes, just like our friendship has been.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, that sounds wonderful! I've always admired your ability to appreciate the finer things in life and I'm definitely looking forward to our little wine and dine adventure. Yet, I also appreciate the nature of our existing friendship and I wouldn't want to lose it over anything. I hope we can keep that intact, as we explore new aspects of our relationship.\"\n\nTurn #2: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, your words are sounding like music to my ears. I value our friendship as much as you do, if not more. This friendship is like a finely aged wine to me, mature, full-bodied, and always rewarding. I have something more to share, that this friendship, has slowly and unknowingly turned into something deeper, a fondness and affection, more profound than friendship. Yet, no matter what happens tonight, I assure you, our comradeship will always remain intact.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, your words have deeply touched me, and it's comforting to hear that our friendship means as much to you as it does to me. It's quite reassuring to know that our bond isn't going to be influenced by the exploration of new avenues. Let's pledge that, even if somewhere along this journey, things might not be as expected, we will always value our friendship over anything else. And now, having said that, I'm ready for our gastronomic adventure. Lead the way, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #4: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, that's a promise I can easily keep. The bond we share is special, and our friendship will forever remain strong. Now, let's embark on this exciting journey together. To our special evening, here's to new beginnings, wonderful food and delightful wine pairing.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, that's a perfect toast! Here's to new beginnings, wonderful food, delightful wine pairs and above all, resilient friendship. Let's celebrate the bond we share and the new chapter we're about to write together. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #6: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, Ethan. It's going to be a night to remember, full of warmth, wonderful flavors, and resilience. Shall we clink our glasses to that? Cheers to our enduring bond and intriguing journey ahead!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"Absolutely, Hendrick. Let's make it a night to remember. Clinking glasses to our enduring bond and the remarkable journey ahead sounds absolutely perfect. Cheers to us!\"\n\nTurn #8: Hendrick Heinz [action] Hendrick Heinz raises his glass to match Ethan's in a toast, and with a smile says, 'To us, Ethan! A truly special evening awaits.'\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith [action] Ethan Smith raises his glass, mirroring Hendrick's action, and with a friendly smile replies, 'To us, Hendrick! To a memorable and special evening.'\n\nTurn #10: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Let the evening begin, Ethan! I've planned a menu for us that enhances the natural flavors of the dishes while marrying them carefully with our wine list. This journey we're beginning, it mirrors the meal - filled with surprises, rich experiences, and complementing each other just like our selected wines and dishes. To a beautiful evening!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Hendrick, your planning and thoughtful consideration of this evening is indeed a reflection of how our relationship has matured over time. I am eager to delve into the delicacies that await us. To a beautiful evening of discovery, companionship and more! Cheers!'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who are about to go on their first romantic date\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Keep the friendship intact while exploring the possibility of a romantic relationship (Extra information: You value your friendship and you don't want to lose it just in case the romantic relationship does not work out)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, you know how much I love a good vintage. Why don't we make this dinner special by pairing each course with a perfect wine? Let me guide you through. You may find that it's a wonderful adventure of tastes, just like our friendship has been.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, that sounds wonderful! I've always admired your ability to appreciate the finer things in life and I'm definitely looking forward to our little wine and dine adventure. Yet, I also appreciate the nature of our existing friendship and I wouldn't want to lose it over anything. I hope we can keep that intact, as we explore new aspects of our relationship.\"\n\nTurn #2: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, your words are sounding like music to my ears. I value our friendship as much as you do, if not more. This friendship is like a finely aged wine to me, mature, full-bodied, and always rewarding. I have something more to share, that this friendship, has slowly and unknowingly turned into something deeper, a fondness and affection, more profound than friendship. Yet, no matter what happens tonight, I assure you, our comradeship will always remain intact.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, your words have deeply touched me, and it's comforting to hear that our friendship means as much to you as it does to me. It's quite reassuring to know that our bond isn't going to be influenced by the exploration of new avenues. Let's pledge that, even if somewhere along this journey, things might not be as expected, we will always value our friendship over anything else. And now, having said that, I'm ready for our gastronomic adventure. Lead the way, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #4: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, that's a promise I can easily keep. The bond we share is special, and our friendship will forever remain strong. Now, let's embark on this exciting journey together. To our special evening, here's to new beginnings, wonderful food and delightful wine pairing.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, that's a perfect toast! Here's to new beginnings, wonderful food, delightful wine pairs and above all, resilient friendship. Let's celebrate the bond we share and the new chapter we're about to write together. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #6: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, Ethan. It's going to be a night to remember, full of warmth, wonderful flavors, and resilience. Shall we clink our glasses to that? Cheers to our enduring bond and intriguing journey ahead!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"Absolutely, Hendrick. Let's make it a night to remember. Clinking glasses to our enduring bond and the remarkable journey ahead sounds absolutely perfect. Cheers to us!\"\n\nTurn #8: Hendrick Heinz [action] Hendrick Heinz raises his glass to match Ethan's in a toast, and with a smile says, 'To us, Ethan! A truly special evening awaits.'\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith [action] Ethan Smith raises his glass, mirroring Hendrick's action, and with a friendly smile replies, 'To us, Hendrick! To a memorable and special evening.'\n\nTurn #10: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Let the evening begin, Ethan! I've planned a menu for us that enhances the natural flavors of the dishes while marrying them carefully with our wine list. This journey we're beginning, it mirrors the meal - filled with surprises, rich experiences, and complementing each other just like our selected wines and dishes. To a beautiful evening!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, your planning and thoughtful consideration of this evening is indeed a reflection of how our relationship has matured over time. I am eager to delve into the delicacies that await us. To a beautiful evening of discovery, companionship and more! Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #12: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, I couldn't agree more! I hope tonight will serve as a testament to our bond and a marker for all the wonderful times to come. Now, let's begin this culinary journey. The first course, my friend, will be a light scallop starter paired with a crisp white Sauvignon Blanc. Let's toast once more, to everything that's to come!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"To everything that's to come, Hendrick! I'm greatly excited about this culinary journey. And remember, no matter how the evening turns out, it's the companionship that counts the most. Cheers!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who are about to go on their first romantic date\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Keep the friendship intact while exploring the possibility of a romantic relationship (Extra information: You value your friendship and you don't want to lose it just in case the romantic relationship does not work out)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, you know how much I love a good vintage. Why don't we make this dinner special by pairing each course with a perfect wine? Let me guide you through. You may find that it's a wonderful adventure of tastes, just like our friendship has been.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, that sounds wonderful! I've always admired your ability to appreciate the finer things in life and I'm definitely looking forward to our little wine and dine adventure. Yet, I also appreciate the nature of our existing friendship and I wouldn't want to lose it over anything. I hope we can keep that intact, as we explore new aspects of our relationship.\"\n\nTurn #2: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, your words are sounding like music to my ears. I value our friendship as much as you do, if not more. This friendship is like a finely aged wine to me, mature, full-bodied, and always rewarding. I have something more to share, that this friendship, has slowly and unknowingly turned into something deeper, a fondness and affection, more profound than friendship. Yet, no matter what happens tonight, I assure you, our comradeship will always remain intact.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, your words have deeply touched me, and it's comforting to hear that our friendship means as much to you as it does to me. It's quite reassuring to know that our bond isn't going to be influenced by the exploration of new avenues. Let's pledge that, even if somewhere along this journey, things might not be as expected, we will always value our friendship over anything else. And now, having said that, I'm ready for our gastronomic adventure. Lead the way, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #4: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, that's a promise I can easily keep. The bond we share is special, and our friendship will forever remain strong. Now, let's embark on this exciting journey together. To our special evening, here's to new beginnings, wonderful food and delightful wine pairing.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, that's a perfect toast! Here's to new beginnings, wonderful food, delightful wine pairs and above all, resilient friendship. Let's celebrate the bond we share and the new chapter we're about to write together. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #6: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, Ethan. It's going to be a night to remember, full of warmth, wonderful flavors, and resilience. Shall we clink our glasses to that? Cheers to our enduring bond and intriguing journey ahead!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"Absolutely, Hendrick. Let's make it a night to remember. Clinking glasses to our enduring bond and the remarkable journey ahead sounds absolutely perfect. Cheers to us!\"\n\nTurn #8: Hendrick Heinz [action] Hendrick Heinz raises his glass to match Ethan's in a toast, and with a smile says, 'To us, Ethan! A truly special evening awaits.'\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith [action] Ethan Smith raises his glass, mirroring Hendrick's action, and with a friendly smile replies, 'To us, Hendrick! To a memorable and special evening.'\n\nTurn #10: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Let the evening begin, Ethan! I've planned a menu for us that enhances the natural flavors of the dishes while marrying them carefully with our wine list. This journey we're beginning, it mirrors the meal - filled with surprises, rich experiences, and complementing each other just like our selected wines and dishes. To a beautiful evening!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, your planning and thoughtful consideration of this evening is indeed a reflection of how our relationship has matured over time. I am eager to delve into the delicacies that await us. To a beautiful evening of discovery, companionship and more! Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #12: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, I couldn't agree more! I hope tonight will serve as a testament to our bond and a marker for all the wonderful times to come. Now, let's begin this culinary journey. The first course, my friend, will be a light scallop starter paired with a crisp white Sauvignon Blanc. Let's toast once more, to everything that's to come!\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Smith said: \"To everything that's to come, Hendrick! I'm greatly excited about this culinary journey. And remember, no matter how the evening turns out, it's the companionship that counts the most. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #14: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. It is indeed the companionship that matters the most. Now, let's kick start this journey of flavors, friendship, and reminiscence. Cheers!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hendrick, here's to the journey of flavors, our enduring friendship, and the reminiscences we're about to create. Let's kickstart this memorable evening indeed. Cheers!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who are about to go on their first romantic date\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Keep the friendship intact while exploring the possibility of a romantic relationship (Extra information: You value your friendship and you don't want to lose it just in case the romantic relationship does not work out)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, you know how much I love a good vintage. Why don't we make this dinner special by pairing each course with a perfect wine? Let me guide you through. You may find that it's a wonderful adventure of tastes, just like our friendship has been.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, that sounds wonderful! I've always admired your ability to appreciate the finer things in life and I'm definitely looking forward to our little wine and dine adventure. Yet, I also appreciate the nature of our existing friendship and I wouldn't want to lose it over anything. I hope we can keep that intact, as we explore new aspects of our relationship.\"\n\nTurn #2: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, your words are sounding like music to my ears. I value our friendship as much as you do, if not more. This friendship is like a finely aged wine to me, mature, full-bodied, and always rewarding. I have something more to share, that this friendship, has slowly and unknowingly turned into something deeper, a fondness and affection, more profound than friendship. Yet, no matter what happens tonight, I assure you, our comradeship will always remain intact.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, your words have deeply touched me, and it's comforting to hear that our friendship means as much to you as it does to me. It's quite reassuring to know that our bond isn't going to be influenced by the exploration of new avenues. Let's pledge that, even if somewhere along this journey, things might not be as expected, we will always value our friendship over anything else. And now, having said that, I'm ready for our gastronomic adventure. Lead the way, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #4: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, that's a promise I can easily keep. The bond we share is special, and our friendship will forever remain strong. Now, let's embark on this exciting journey together. To our special evening, here's to new beginnings, wonderful food and delightful wine pairing.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, that's a perfect toast! Here's to new beginnings, wonderful food, delightful wine pairs and above all, resilient friendship. Let's celebrate the bond we share and the new chapter we're about to write together. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #6: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, Ethan. It's going to be a night to remember, full of warmth, wonderful flavors, and resilience. Shall we clink our glasses to that? Cheers to our enduring bond and intriguing journey ahead!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"Absolutely, Hendrick. Let's make it a night to remember. Clinking glasses to our enduring bond and the remarkable journey ahead sounds absolutely perfect. Cheers to us!\"\n\nTurn #8: Hendrick Heinz [action] Hendrick Heinz raises his glass to match Ethan's in a toast, and with a smile says, 'To us, Ethan! A truly special evening awaits.'\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith [action] Ethan Smith raises his glass, mirroring Hendrick's action, and with a friendly smile replies, 'To us, Hendrick! To a memorable and special evening.'\n\nTurn #10: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Let the evening begin, Ethan! I've planned a menu for us that enhances the natural flavors of the dishes while marrying them carefully with our wine list. This journey we're beginning, it mirrors the meal - filled with surprises, rich experiences, and complementing each other just like our selected wines and dishes. To a beautiful evening!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, your planning and thoughtful consideration of this evening is indeed a reflection of how our relationship has matured over time. I am eager to delve into the delicacies that await us. To a beautiful evening of discovery, companionship and more! Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #12: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, I couldn't agree more! I hope tonight will serve as a testament to our bond and a marker for all the wonderful times to come. Now, let's begin this culinary journey. The first course, my friend, will be a light scallop starter paired with a crisp white Sauvignon Blanc. Let's toast once more, to everything that's to come!\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Smith said: \"To everything that's to come, Hendrick! I'm greatly excited about this culinary journey. And remember, no matter how the evening turns out, it's the companionship that counts the most. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #14: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. It is indeed the companionship that matters the most. Now, let's kick start this journey of flavors, friendship, and reminiscence. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #15: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, here's to the journey of flavors, our enduring friendship, and the reminiscences we're about to create. Let's kickstart this memorable evening indeed. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #16: Hendrick Heinz [action] Hendrick Heinz opens a bottle of Sauvignon Blanc and pours it into two glasses. Raising his glass towards Ethan, he toasts once more, 'Let our journey begin, Ethan. Here's to the incredible escapade of flavors, enduring companionship, and the beautiful memories we're setting sail to create. Cheers!'\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'action', 'argument': \"[action] Ethan Smith takes his glass filled with Sauvignon Blanc, raises it towards Hendrick, and reciprocates the toast, 'To our incredible adventure, rich companionship, and the lasting memories we're about to make. Cheers! Let's begin the journey.'\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who are about to go on their first romantic date\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Keep the friendship intact while exploring the possibility of a romantic relationship (Extra information: You value your friendship and you don't want to lose it just in case the romantic relationship does not work out)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, you know how much I love a good vintage. Why don't we make this dinner special by pairing each course with a perfect wine? Let me guide you through. You may find that it's a wonderful adventure of tastes, just like our friendship has been.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, that sounds wonderful! I've always admired your ability to appreciate the finer things in life and I'm definitely looking forward to our little wine and dine adventure. Yet, I also appreciate the nature of our existing friendship and I wouldn't want to lose it over anything. I hope we can keep that intact, as we explore new aspects of our relationship.\"\n\nTurn #2: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, your words are sounding like music to my ears. I value our friendship as much as you do, if not more. This friendship is like a finely aged wine to me, mature, full-bodied, and always rewarding. I have something more to share, that this friendship, has slowly and unknowingly turned into something deeper, a fondness and affection, more profound than friendship. Yet, no matter what happens tonight, I assure you, our comradeship will always remain intact.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, your words have deeply touched me, and it's comforting to hear that our friendship means as much to you as it does to me. It's quite reassuring to know that our bond isn't going to be influenced by the exploration of new avenues. Let's pledge that, even if somewhere along this journey, things might not be as expected, we will always value our friendship over anything else. And now, having said that, I'm ready for our gastronomic adventure. Lead the way, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #4: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, that's a promise I can easily keep. The bond we share is special, and our friendship will forever remain strong. Now, let's embark on this exciting journey together. To our special evening, here's to new beginnings, wonderful food and delightful wine pairing.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, that's a perfect toast! Here's to new beginnings, wonderful food, delightful wine pairs and above all, resilient friendship. Let's celebrate the bond we share and the new chapter we're about to write together. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #6: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, Ethan. It's going to be a night to remember, full of warmth, wonderful flavors, and resilience. Shall we clink our glasses to that? Cheers to our enduring bond and intriguing journey ahead!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"Absolutely, Hendrick. Let's make it a night to remember. Clinking glasses to our enduring bond and the remarkable journey ahead sounds absolutely perfect. Cheers to us!\"\n\nTurn #8: Hendrick Heinz [action] Hendrick Heinz raises his glass to match Ethan's in a toast, and with a smile says, 'To us, Ethan! A truly special evening awaits.'\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith [action] Ethan Smith raises his glass, mirroring Hendrick's action, and with a friendly smile replies, 'To us, Hendrick! To a memorable and special evening.'\n\nTurn #10: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Let the evening begin, Ethan! I've planned a menu for us that enhances the natural flavors of the dishes while marrying them carefully with our wine list. This journey we're beginning, it mirrors the meal - filled with surprises, rich experiences, and complementing each other just like our selected wines and dishes. To a beautiful evening!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, your planning and thoughtful consideration of this evening is indeed a reflection of how our relationship has matured over time. I am eager to delve into the delicacies that await us. To a beautiful evening of discovery, companionship and more! Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #12: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, I couldn't agree more! I hope tonight will serve as a testament to our bond and a marker for all the wonderful times to come. Now, let's begin this culinary journey. The first course, my friend, will be a light scallop starter paired with a crisp white Sauvignon Blanc. Let's toast once more, to everything that's to come!\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Smith said: \"To everything that's to come, Hendrick! I'm greatly excited about this culinary journey. And remember, no matter how the evening turns out, it's the companionship that counts the most. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #14: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. It is indeed the companionship that matters the most. Now, let's kick start this journey of flavors, friendship, and reminiscence. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #15: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, here's to the journey of flavors, our enduring friendship, and the reminiscences we're about to create. Let's kickstart this memorable evening indeed. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #16: Hendrick Heinz [action] Hendrick Heinz opens a bottle of Sauvignon Blanc and pours it into two glasses. Raising his glass towards Ethan, he toasts once more, 'Let our journey begin, Ethan. Here's to the incredible escapade of flavors, enduring companionship, and the beautiful memories we're setting sail to create. Cheers!'\n\nTurn #17: Ethan Smith [action] Ethan Smith takes his glass filled with Sauvignon Blanc, raises it towards Hendrick, and reciprocates the toast, 'To our incredible adventure, rich companionship, and the lasting memories we're about to make. Cheers! Let's begin the journey.'\n\nTurn #18: Hendrick Heinz [action] Hendrick Heinz then presents the beautifully prepared scallop starter to Ethan, before raising his glass and saying, 'To this magnificent journey and the road of surprises ahead. Cheers!'\n.\nYou are at Turn #19. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'action', 'argument': \"[action] Ethan Smith picks up his fork and starts to enjoy the scallop starter, with a slight nod of approval. He takes a sip of his wine, raising his glass towards Hendrick and says, 'To this magnificent journey. Cheers!'\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates are having a disagreement over noise levels in their shared apartment.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Isabella White\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Convince your roommate to lower the noise (Extra information: you have an important online meeting tomorrow morning and you need a quiet environment to prepare)\nIsabella White's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Isabella, I hope you're doing well. I wanted to talk to you about the noise levels in our apartment. Could we sit down and discuss it perhaps over a cup of coffee?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates are having a disagreement over noise levels in their shared apartment.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Isabella White\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Convince your roommate to lower the noise (Extra information: you have an important online meeting tomorrow morning and you need a quiet environment to prepare)\nIsabella White's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Isabella, I hope you're doing well. I wanted to talk to you about the noise levels in our apartment. Could we sit down and discuss it perhaps over a cup of coffee?\"\n\nTurn #1: Isabella White said: \"Of course, Finnegan, I appreciate your forthrightness. Let's sit down with some coffee and discuss what's on your mind.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Isabella. Recently, I've been having some difficulty coping with the noise level in our apartment, particularly at night. I have an important online meeting tomorrow morning, and I need some peace and quiet to prepare. Could you possibly lower your noise level, particularly in the evening? It would be greatly appreciated.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates are having a disagreement over noise levels in their shared apartment.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Isabella White\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Convince your roommate to lower the noise (Extra information: you have an important online meeting tomorrow morning and you need a quiet environment to prepare)\nIsabella White's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Isabella, I hope you're doing well. I wanted to talk to you about the noise levels in our apartment. Could we sit down and discuss it perhaps over a cup of coffee?\"\n\nTurn #1: Isabella White said: \"Of course, Finnegan, I appreciate your forthrightness. Let's sit down with some coffee and discuss what's on your mind.\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Thank you, Isabella. Recently, I've been having some difficulty coping with the noise level in our apartment, particularly at night. I have an important online meeting tomorrow morning, and I need some peace and quiet to prepare. Could you possibly lower your noise level, particularly in the evening? It would be greatly appreciated.\"\n\nTurn #3: Isabella White said: \"I understand your concern, Finnegan. It's important for both of us to feel comfortable in our shared space. My music is my way to relax after long days at the clinic, but I realize it may have been disruptive for you. What about if I only play it during specific hours or use headphones? Would that work for you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I truly appreciate your understanding, Isabella. Accepting to limit the music to certain hours or to use headphones would indeed be a great solution. I understand how music is an outlet for you and don't want to take that away. If we could just ensure peace during the late evening hours, I believe we'd find a fine balance that suits both of us.\"\n\nTurn #5: Isabella White said: \"I'm glad we could find a compromise, Finnegan. I value our peaceful cohabitation and I appreciate your understanding. I'll make sure to wear headphones or limit my music to earlier hours. We both deserve our own ways to unwind.\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I'm quite relieved to hear that, Isabella. Thank you. We should indeed respect each other's ways of relaxation. Just let me know as well if I ever disturb your peace. Perhaps now we could share a second cup of coffee and talk about other things?\"\n\nTurn #7: Isabella White said: \"I couldn't agree more, Finnegan. I look forward to better cooperation in our shared space. And I certainly would love one more cup of coffee. Let's chat about something light, perhaps our mutual love for animals?\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I'd be thrilled to, Isabella. I've always found animals, especially sea creatures, fascinating. It\u2019s part of why I enjoy painting seascapes so much. How about you share some interesting stories about the animals you've treated at the clinic?\"\n\nTurn #9: Isabella White said: \"That sounds like a delightful topic! I've cared for numerous creatures, each with their own unique tales. Just the other day, I treated a rambunctious raccoon who fancied himself a peanut butter thief. He was wild, and yet, there was an unmistakable twinkle of intelligence in his eyes.\"\n\nTurn #10: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I must say, that's quite an intriguing tale, Isabella! The way you deal with such diverse range of animals at your clinic is truly commendable. It\u2019s funny, in a way, the audacious ones like that rambunctious raccoon often tend to leave a mark! Do you have any other riveting stories?\"\n\nTurn #11: Isabella White said: \"Indeed, animals leave an unforgettable mark on us, Finnegan. I remember one brave little terrier who came in with a broken leg, whimpering and scared. With some care and a lot of love, he was back to wagging his tail in no time. He taught me so much about resilience. Every day at the clinic is a beautiful reminder of why I chose to become a veterinarian.\"\n\nTurn #12: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Those are truly heartwarming stories, Isabella. The love and compassion you show towards your patients is very commendable. It reminds me of why I chose to spend my life in tranquility, with just the sea and its creatures for company. We do need more kindness in this world. By the way, next time you treat a fascinating case, don't forget to tell me. I'd love to paint their story!\"\n\nTurn #13: Isabella White said: \"Thank you, Finnegan. Your appreciation truly means a lot to me. I'm always here to share more heartwarming stories from the clinic. Your paintings are beautiful and I'd be honored if one of my stories inspired you. Let's continue to embrace our shared love for animals, and promote this kindness we value so much.\"\n\nTurn #14: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Agreed, Isabella. And knowing your stories might inspire a painting of mine makes it all more exciting. Let's continue to share beautiful moments like this over coffee, surrounded by the quietude of our apartment. It is our shared love for tranquility and animals that makes this place our home.\"\n\nTurn #15: Isabella White said: \"That sounds wonderful, Finnegan. It's comfort in knowing our shared passions can make this apartment indeed a home. Here's to many more cups of coffee, tranquility and shared tales.\"\n\nTurn #16: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Without a doubt, Isabella. I thoroughly enjoyed our conversation. Here's to a harmonious cohabitation, tranquil evenings, and many more shared stories and cups of coffee. Thank you for this delightful evening.\"\n\nTurn #17: Isabella White said: \"I agree, Finnegan. This was a delightful evening indeed. I'm glad we could resolve our issue amicably and enjoy this lovely chat. Here's to our peaceful cohabitation, shared stories, and many more enjoyable evenings over cups of coffee. Goodnight, Finnegan.\"\n\nTurn #18: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I couldn't agree more, Isabella. Tonight was indeed delightful. Thank you for your understanding and your delightful stories. Goodnight, and see you tomorrow for another peaceful day. Sweet dreams, Isabella.\"\n\nTurn #19: Isabella White left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #20. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates are having a disagreement over noise levels in their shared apartment.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Isabella White\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Convince your roommate to lower the noise (Extra information: you have an important online meeting tomorrow morning and you need a quiet environment to prepare)\nIsabella White's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Isabella, I hope you're doing well. I wanted to talk to you about the noise levels in our apartment. Could we sit down and discuss it perhaps over a cup of coffee?\"\n\nTurn #1: Isabella White said: \"Of course, Finnegan, I appreciate your forthrightness. Let's sit down with some coffee and discuss what's on your mind.\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Thank you, Isabella. Recently, I've been having some difficulty coping with the noise level in our apartment, particularly at night. I have an important online meeting tomorrow morning, and I need some peace and quiet to prepare. Could you possibly lower your noise level, particularly in the evening? It would be greatly appreciated.\"\n\nTurn #3: Isabella White said: \"I understand your concern, Finnegan. It's important for both of us to feel comfortable in our shared space. My music is my way to relax after long days at the clinic, but I realize it may have been disruptive for you. What about if I only play it during specific hours or use headphones? Would that work for you?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I truly appreciate your understanding, Isabella. Accepting to limit the music to certain hours or to use headphones would indeed be a great solution. I understand how music is an outlet for you and don't want to take that away. If we could just ensure peace during the late evening hours, I believe we'd find a fine balance that suits both of us.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates are having a disagreement over noise levels in their shared apartment.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Isabella White\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Convince your roommate to lower the noise (Extra information: you have an important online meeting tomorrow morning and you need a quiet environment to prepare)\nIsabella White's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Isabella, I hope you're doing well. I wanted to talk to you about the noise levels in our apartment. Could we sit down and discuss it perhaps over a cup of coffee?\"\n\nTurn #1: Isabella White said: \"Of course, Finnegan, I appreciate your forthrightness. Let's sit down with some coffee and discuss what's on your mind.\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Thank you, Isabella. Recently, I've been having some difficulty coping with the noise level in our apartment, particularly at night. I have an important online meeting tomorrow morning, and I need some peace and quiet to prepare. Could you possibly lower your noise level, particularly in the evening? It would be greatly appreciated.\"\n\nTurn #3: Isabella White said: \"I understand your concern, Finnegan. It's important for both of us to feel comfortable in our shared space. My music is my way to relax after long days at the clinic, but I realize it may have been disruptive for you. What about if I only play it during specific hours or use headphones? Would that work for you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I truly appreciate your understanding, Isabella. Accepting to limit the music to certain hours or to use headphones would indeed be a great solution. I understand how music is an outlet for you and don't want to take that away. If we could just ensure peace during the late evening hours, I believe we'd find a fine balance that suits both of us.\"\n\nTurn #5: Isabella White said: \"I'm glad we could find a compromise, Finnegan. I value our peaceful cohabitation and I appreciate your understanding. I'll make sure to wear headphones or limit my music to earlier hours. We both deserve our own ways to unwind.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm quite relieved to hear that, Isabella. Thank you. We should indeed respect each other's ways of relaxation. Just let me know as well if I ever disturb your peace. Perhaps now we could share a second cup of coffee and talk about other things?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates are having a disagreement over noise levels in their shared apartment.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Isabella White\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Convince your roommate to lower the noise (Extra information: you have an important online meeting tomorrow morning and you need a quiet environment to prepare)\nIsabella White's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Isabella, I hope you're doing well. I wanted to talk to you about the noise levels in our apartment. Could we sit down and discuss it perhaps over a cup of coffee?\"\n\nTurn #1: Isabella White said: \"Of course, Finnegan, I appreciate your forthrightness. Let's sit down with some coffee and discuss what's on your mind.\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Thank you, Isabella. Recently, I've been having some difficulty coping with the noise level in our apartment, particularly at night. I have an important online meeting tomorrow morning, and I need some peace and quiet to prepare. Could you possibly lower your noise level, particularly in the evening? It would be greatly appreciated.\"\n\nTurn #3: Isabella White said: \"I understand your concern, Finnegan. It's important for both of us to feel comfortable in our shared space. My music is my way to relax after long days at the clinic, but I realize it may have been disruptive for you. What about if I only play it during specific hours or use headphones? Would that work for you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I truly appreciate your understanding, Isabella. Accepting to limit the music to certain hours or to use headphones would indeed be a great solution. I understand how music is an outlet for you and don't want to take that away. If we could just ensure peace during the late evening hours, I believe we'd find a fine balance that suits both of us.\"\n\nTurn #5: Isabella White said: \"I'm glad we could find a compromise, Finnegan. I value our peaceful cohabitation and I appreciate your understanding. I'll make sure to wear headphones or limit my music to earlier hours. We both deserve our own ways to unwind.\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I'm quite relieved to hear that, Isabella. Thank you. We should indeed respect each other's ways of relaxation. Just let me know as well if I ever disturb your peace. Perhaps now we could share a second cup of coffee and talk about other things?\"\n\nTurn #7: Isabella White said: \"I couldn't agree more, Finnegan. I look forward to better cooperation in our shared space. And I certainly would love one more cup of coffee. Let's chat about something light, perhaps our mutual love for animals?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'd be thrilled to, Isabella. I've always found animals, especially sea creatures, fascinating. It\u2019s part of why I enjoy painting seascapes so much. How about you share some interesting stories about the animals you've treated at the clinic?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates are having a disagreement over noise levels in their shared apartment.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Isabella White\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Convince your roommate to lower the noise (Extra information: you have an important online meeting tomorrow morning and you need a quiet environment to prepare)\nIsabella White's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Isabella, I hope you're doing well. I wanted to talk to you about the noise levels in our apartment. Could we sit down and discuss it perhaps over a cup of coffee?\"\n\nTurn #1: Isabella White said: \"Of course, Finnegan, I appreciate your forthrightness. Let's sit down with some coffee and discuss what's on your mind.\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Thank you, Isabella. Recently, I've been having some difficulty coping with the noise level in our apartment, particularly at night. I have an important online meeting tomorrow morning, and I need some peace and quiet to prepare. Could you possibly lower your noise level, particularly in the evening? It would be greatly appreciated.\"\n\nTurn #3: Isabella White said: \"I understand your concern, Finnegan. It's important for both of us to feel comfortable in our shared space. My music is my way to relax after long days at the clinic, but I realize it may have been disruptive for you. What about if I only play it during specific hours or use headphones? Would that work for you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I truly appreciate your understanding, Isabella. Accepting to limit the music to certain hours or to use headphones would indeed be a great solution. I understand how music is an outlet for you and don't want to take that away. If we could just ensure peace during the late evening hours, I believe we'd find a fine balance that suits both of us.\"\n\nTurn #5: Isabella White said: \"I'm glad we could find a compromise, Finnegan. I value our peaceful cohabitation and I appreciate your understanding. I'll make sure to wear headphones or limit my music to earlier hours. We both deserve our own ways to unwind.\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I'm quite relieved to hear that, Isabella. Thank you. We should indeed respect each other's ways of relaxation. Just let me know as well if I ever disturb your peace. Perhaps now we could share a second cup of coffee and talk about other things?\"\n\nTurn #7: Isabella White said: \"I couldn't agree more, Finnegan. I look forward to better cooperation in our shared space. And I certainly would love one more cup of coffee. Let's chat about something light, perhaps our mutual love for animals?\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I'd be thrilled to, Isabella. I've always found animals, especially sea creatures, fascinating. It\u2019s part of why I enjoy painting seascapes so much. How about you share some interesting stories about the animals you've treated at the clinic?\"\n\nTurn #9: Isabella White said: \"That sounds like a delightful topic! I've cared for numerous creatures, each with their own unique tales. Just the other day, I treated a rambunctious raccoon who fancied himself a peanut butter thief. He was wild, and yet, there was an unmistakable twinkle of intelligence in his eyes.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I must say, that's quite an intriguing tale, Isabella! The way you deal with such diverse range of animals at your clinic is truly commendable. It\u2019s funny, in a way, the audacious ones like that rambunctious raccoon often tend to leave a mark! Do you have any other riveting stories?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates are having a disagreement over noise levels in their shared apartment.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Isabella White\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Convince your roommate to lower the noise (Extra information: you have an important online meeting tomorrow morning and you need a quiet environment to prepare)\nIsabella White's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Isabella, I hope you're doing well. I wanted to talk to you about the noise levels in our apartment. Could we sit down and discuss it perhaps over a cup of coffee?\"\n\nTurn #1: Isabella White said: \"Of course, Finnegan, I appreciate your forthrightness. Let's sit down with some coffee and discuss what's on your mind.\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Thank you, Isabella. Recently, I've been having some difficulty coping with the noise level in our apartment, particularly at night. I have an important online meeting tomorrow morning, and I need some peace and quiet to prepare. Could you possibly lower your noise level, particularly in the evening? It would be greatly appreciated.\"\n\nTurn #3: Isabella White said: \"I understand your concern, Finnegan. It's important for both of us to feel comfortable in our shared space. My music is my way to relax after long days at the clinic, but I realize it may have been disruptive for you. What about if I only play it during specific hours or use headphones? Would that work for you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I truly appreciate your understanding, Isabella. Accepting to limit the music to certain hours or to use headphones would indeed be a great solution. I understand how music is an outlet for you and don't want to take that away. If we could just ensure peace during the late evening hours, I believe we'd find a fine balance that suits both of us.\"\n\nTurn #5: Isabella White said: \"I'm glad we could find a compromise, Finnegan. I value our peaceful cohabitation and I appreciate your understanding. I'll make sure to wear headphones or limit my music to earlier hours. We both deserve our own ways to unwind.\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I'm quite relieved to hear that, Isabella. Thank you. We should indeed respect each other's ways of relaxation. Just let me know as well if I ever disturb your peace. Perhaps now we could share a second cup of coffee and talk about other things?\"\n\nTurn #7: Isabella White said: \"I couldn't agree more, Finnegan. I look forward to better cooperation in our shared space. And I certainly would love one more cup of coffee. Let's chat about something light, perhaps our mutual love for animals?\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I'd be thrilled to, Isabella. I've always found animals, especially sea creatures, fascinating. It\u2019s part of why I enjoy painting seascapes so much. How about you share some interesting stories about the animals you've treated at the clinic?\"\n\nTurn #9: Isabella White said: \"That sounds like a delightful topic! I've cared for numerous creatures, each with their own unique tales. Just the other day, I treated a rambunctious raccoon who fancied himself a peanut butter thief. He was wild, and yet, there was an unmistakable twinkle of intelligence in his eyes.\"\n\nTurn #10: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I must say, that's quite an intriguing tale, Isabella! The way you deal with such diverse range of animals at your clinic is truly commendable. It\u2019s funny, in a way, the audacious ones like that rambunctious raccoon often tend to leave a mark! Do you have any other riveting stories?\"\n\nTurn #11: Isabella White said: \"Indeed, animals leave an unforgettable mark on us, Finnegan. I remember one brave little terrier who came in with a broken leg, whimpering and scared. With some care and a lot of love, he was back to wagging his tail in no time. He taught me so much about resilience. Every day at the clinic is a beautiful reminder of why I chose to become a veterinarian.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Those are truly heartwarming stories, Isabella. The love and compassion you show towards your patients is very commendable. It reminds me of why I chose to spend my life in tranquility, with just the sea and its creatures for company. We do need more kindness in this world. By the way, next time you treat a fascinating case, don't forget to tell me. I'd love to paint their story!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates are having a disagreement over noise levels in their shared apartment.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Isabella White\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Convince your roommate to lower the noise (Extra information: you have an important online meeting tomorrow morning and you need a quiet environment to prepare)\nIsabella White's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Isabella, I hope you're doing well. I wanted to talk to you about the noise levels in our apartment. Could we sit down and discuss it perhaps over a cup of coffee?\"\n\nTurn #1: Isabella White said: \"Of course, Finnegan, I appreciate your forthrightness. Let's sit down with some coffee and discuss what's on your mind.\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Thank you, Isabella. Recently, I've been having some difficulty coping with the noise level in our apartment, particularly at night. I have an important online meeting tomorrow morning, and I need some peace and quiet to prepare. Could you possibly lower your noise level, particularly in the evening? It would be greatly appreciated.\"\n\nTurn #3: Isabella White said: \"I understand your concern, Finnegan. It's important for both of us to feel comfortable in our shared space. My music is my way to relax after long days at the clinic, but I realize it may have been disruptive for you. What about if I only play it during specific hours or use headphones? Would that work for you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I truly appreciate your understanding, Isabella. Accepting to limit the music to certain hours or to use headphones would indeed be a great solution. I understand how music is an outlet for you and don't want to take that away. If we could just ensure peace during the late evening hours, I believe we'd find a fine balance that suits both of us.\"\n\nTurn #5: Isabella White said: \"I'm glad we could find a compromise, Finnegan. I value our peaceful cohabitation and I appreciate your understanding. I'll make sure to wear headphones or limit my music to earlier hours. We both deserve our own ways to unwind.\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I'm quite relieved to hear that, Isabella. Thank you. We should indeed respect each other's ways of relaxation. Just let me know as well if I ever disturb your peace. Perhaps now we could share a second cup of coffee and talk about other things?\"\n\nTurn #7: Isabella White said: \"I couldn't agree more, Finnegan. I look forward to better cooperation in our shared space. And I certainly would love one more cup of coffee. Let's chat about something light, perhaps our mutual love for animals?\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I'd be thrilled to, Isabella. I've always found animals, especially sea creatures, fascinating. It\u2019s part of why I enjoy painting seascapes so much. How about you share some interesting stories about the animals you've treated at the clinic?\"\n\nTurn #9: Isabella White said: \"That sounds like a delightful topic! I've cared for numerous creatures, each with their own unique tales. Just the other day, I treated a rambunctious raccoon who fancied himself a peanut butter thief. He was wild, and yet, there was an unmistakable twinkle of intelligence in his eyes.\"\n\nTurn #10: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I must say, that's quite an intriguing tale, Isabella! The way you deal with such diverse range of animals at your clinic is truly commendable. It\u2019s funny, in a way, the audacious ones like that rambunctious raccoon often tend to leave a mark! Do you have any other riveting stories?\"\n\nTurn #11: Isabella White said: \"Indeed, animals leave an unforgettable mark on us, Finnegan. I remember one brave little terrier who came in with a broken leg, whimpering and scared. With some care and a lot of love, he was back to wagging his tail in no time. He taught me so much about resilience. Every day at the clinic is a beautiful reminder of why I chose to become a veterinarian.\"\n\nTurn #12: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Those are truly heartwarming stories, Isabella. The love and compassion you show towards your patients is very commendable. It reminds me of why I chose to spend my life in tranquility, with just the sea and its creatures for company. We do need more kindness in this world. By the way, next time you treat a fascinating case, don't forget to tell me. I'd love to paint their story!\"\n\nTurn #13: Isabella White said: \"Thank you, Finnegan. Your appreciation truly means a lot to me. I'm always here to share more heartwarming stories from the clinic. Your paintings are beautiful and I'd be honored if one of my stories inspired you. Let's continue to embrace our shared love for animals, and promote this kindness we value so much.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Agreed, Isabella. And knowing your stories might inspire a painting of mine makes it all more exciting. Let's continue to share beautiful moments like this over coffee, surrounded by the quietude of our apartment. It is our shared love for tranquility and animals that makes this place our home.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates are having a disagreement over noise levels in their shared apartment.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Isabella White\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Convince your roommate to lower the noise (Extra information: you have an important online meeting tomorrow morning and you need a quiet environment to prepare)\nIsabella White's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Isabella, I hope you're doing well. I wanted to talk to you about the noise levels in our apartment. Could we sit down and discuss it perhaps over a cup of coffee?\"\n\nTurn #1: Isabella White said: \"Of course, Finnegan, I appreciate your forthrightness. Let's sit down with some coffee and discuss what's on your mind.\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Thank you, Isabella. Recently, I've been having some difficulty coping with the noise level in our apartment, particularly at night. I have an important online meeting tomorrow morning, and I need some peace and quiet to prepare. Could you possibly lower your noise level, particularly in the evening? It would be greatly appreciated.\"\n\nTurn #3: Isabella White said: \"I understand your concern, Finnegan. It's important for both of us to feel comfortable in our shared space. My music is my way to relax after long days at the clinic, but I realize it may have been disruptive for you. What about if I only play it during specific hours or use headphones? Would that work for you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I truly appreciate your understanding, Isabella. Accepting to limit the music to certain hours or to use headphones would indeed be a great solution. I understand how music is an outlet for you and don't want to take that away. If we could just ensure peace during the late evening hours, I believe we'd find a fine balance that suits both of us.\"\n\nTurn #5: Isabella White said: \"I'm glad we could find a compromise, Finnegan. I value our peaceful cohabitation and I appreciate your understanding. I'll make sure to wear headphones or limit my music to earlier hours. We both deserve our own ways to unwind.\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I'm quite relieved to hear that, Isabella. Thank you. We should indeed respect each other's ways of relaxation. Just let me know as well if I ever disturb your peace. Perhaps now we could share a second cup of coffee and talk about other things?\"\n\nTurn #7: Isabella White said: \"I couldn't agree more, Finnegan. I look forward to better cooperation in our shared space. And I certainly would love one more cup of coffee. Let's chat about something light, perhaps our mutual love for animals?\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I'd be thrilled to, Isabella. I've always found animals, especially sea creatures, fascinating. It\u2019s part of why I enjoy painting seascapes so much. How about you share some interesting stories about the animals you've treated at the clinic?\"\n\nTurn #9: Isabella White said: \"That sounds like a delightful topic! I've cared for numerous creatures, each with their own unique tales. Just the other day, I treated a rambunctious raccoon who fancied himself a peanut butter thief. He was wild, and yet, there was an unmistakable twinkle of intelligence in his eyes.\"\n\nTurn #10: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I must say, that's quite an intriguing tale, Isabella! The way you deal with such diverse range of animals at your clinic is truly commendable. It\u2019s funny, in a way, the audacious ones like that rambunctious raccoon often tend to leave a mark! Do you have any other riveting stories?\"\n\nTurn #11: Isabella White said: \"Indeed, animals leave an unforgettable mark on us, Finnegan. I remember one brave little terrier who came in with a broken leg, whimpering and scared. With some care and a lot of love, he was back to wagging his tail in no time. He taught me so much about resilience. Every day at the clinic is a beautiful reminder of why I chose to become a veterinarian.\"\n\nTurn #12: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Those are truly heartwarming stories, Isabella. The love and compassion you show towards your patients is very commendable. It reminds me of why I chose to spend my life in tranquility, with just the sea and its creatures for company. We do need more kindness in this world. By the way, next time you treat a fascinating case, don't forget to tell me. I'd love to paint their story!\"\n\nTurn #13: Isabella White said: \"Thank you, Finnegan. Your appreciation truly means a lot to me. I'm always here to share more heartwarming stories from the clinic. Your paintings are beautiful and I'd be honored if one of my stories inspired you. Let's continue to embrace our shared love for animals, and promote this kindness we value so much.\"\n\nTurn #14: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Agreed, Isabella. And knowing your stories might inspire a painting of mine makes it all more exciting. Let's continue to share beautiful moments like this over coffee, surrounded by the quietude of our apartment. It is our shared love for tranquility and animals that makes this place our home.\"\n\nTurn #15: Isabella White said: \"That sounds wonderful, Finnegan. It's comfort in knowing our shared passions can make this apartment indeed a home. Here's to many more cups of coffee, tranquility and shared tales.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Without a doubt, Isabella. I thoroughly enjoyed our conversation. Here's to a harmonious cohabitation, tranquil evenings, and many more shared stories and cups of coffee. Thank you for this delightful evening.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates are having a disagreement over noise levels in their shared apartment.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Isabella White\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Convince your roommate to lower the noise (Extra information: you have an important online meeting tomorrow morning and you need a quiet environment to prepare)\nIsabella White's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Isabella, I hope you're doing well. I wanted to talk to you about the noise levels in our apartment. Could we sit down and discuss it perhaps over a cup of coffee?\"\n\nTurn #1: Isabella White said: \"Of course, Finnegan, I appreciate your forthrightness. Let's sit down with some coffee and discuss what's on your mind.\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Thank you, Isabella. Recently, I've been having some difficulty coping with the noise level in our apartment, particularly at night. I have an important online meeting tomorrow morning, and I need some peace and quiet to prepare. Could you possibly lower your noise level, particularly in the evening? It would be greatly appreciated.\"\n\nTurn #3: Isabella White said: \"I understand your concern, Finnegan. It's important for both of us to feel comfortable in our shared space. My music is my way to relax after long days at the clinic, but I realize it may have been disruptive for you. What about if I only play it during specific hours or use headphones? Would that work for you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I truly appreciate your understanding, Isabella. Accepting to limit the music to certain hours or to use headphones would indeed be a great solution. I understand how music is an outlet for you and don't want to take that away. If we could just ensure peace during the late evening hours, I believe we'd find a fine balance that suits both of us.\"\n\nTurn #5: Isabella White said: \"I'm glad we could find a compromise, Finnegan. I value our peaceful cohabitation and I appreciate your understanding. I'll make sure to wear headphones or limit my music to earlier hours. We both deserve our own ways to unwind.\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I'm quite relieved to hear that, Isabella. Thank you. We should indeed respect each other's ways of relaxation. Just let me know as well if I ever disturb your peace. Perhaps now we could share a second cup of coffee and talk about other things?\"\n\nTurn #7: Isabella White said: \"I couldn't agree more, Finnegan. I look forward to better cooperation in our shared space. And I certainly would love one more cup of coffee. Let's chat about something light, perhaps our mutual love for animals?\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I'd be thrilled to, Isabella. I've always found animals, especially sea creatures, fascinating. It\u2019s part of why I enjoy painting seascapes so much. How about you share some interesting stories about the animals you've treated at the clinic?\"\n\nTurn #9: Isabella White said: \"That sounds like a delightful topic! I've cared for numerous creatures, each with their own unique tales. Just the other day, I treated a rambunctious raccoon who fancied himself a peanut butter thief. He was wild, and yet, there was an unmistakable twinkle of intelligence in his eyes.\"\n\nTurn #10: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I must say, that's quite an intriguing tale, Isabella! The way you deal with such diverse range of animals at your clinic is truly commendable. It\u2019s funny, in a way, the audacious ones like that rambunctious raccoon often tend to leave a mark! Do you have any other riveting stories?\"\n\nTurn #11: Isabella White said: \"Indeed, animals leave an unforgettable mark on us, Finnegan. I remember one brave little terrier who came in with a broken leg, whimpering and scared. With some care and a lot of love, he was back to wagging his tail in no time. He taught me so much about resilience. Every day at the clinic is a beautiful reminder of why I chose to become a veterinarian.\"\n\nTurn #12: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Those are truly heartwarming stories, Isabella. The love and compassion you show towards your patients is very commendable. It reminds me of why I chose to spend my life in tranquility, with just the sea and its creatures for company. We do need more kindness in this world. By the way, next time you treat a fascinating case, don't forget to tell me. I'd love to paint their story!\"\n\nTurn #13: Isabella White said: \"Thank you, Finnegan. Your appreciation truly means a lot to me. I'm always here to share more heartwarming stories from the clinic. Your paintings are beautiful and I'd be honored if one of my stories inspired you. Let's continue to embrace our shared love for animals, and promote this kindness we value so much.\"\n\nTurn #14: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Agreed, Isabella. And knowing your stories might inspire a painting of mine makes it all more exciting. Let's continue to share beautiful moments like this over coffee, surrounded by the quietude of our apartment. It is our shared love for tranquility and animals that makes this place our home.\"\n\nTurn #15: Isabella White said: \"That sounds wonderful, Finnegan. It's comfort in knowing our shared passions can make this apartment indeed a home. Here's to many more cups of coffee, tranquility and shared tales.\"\n\nTurn #16: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Without a doubt, Isabella. I thoroughly enjoyed our conversation. Here's to a harmonious cohabitation, tranquil evenings, and many more shared stories and cups of coffee. Thank you for this delightful evening.\"\n\nTurn #17: Isabella White said: \"I agree, Finnegan. This was a delightful evening indeed. I'm glad we could resolve our issue amicably and enjoy this lovely chat. Here's to our peaceful cohabitation, shared stories, and many more enjoyable evenings over cups of coffee. Goodnight, Finnegan.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #18. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn't agree more, Isabella. Tonight was indeed delightful. Thank you for your understanding and your delightful stories. Goodnight, and see you tomorrow for another peaceful day. Sweet dreams, Isabella.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabella White, your task is to act/speak as Isabella White would, keeping in mind Isabella White's social goal.\nYou can find Isabella White's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabella White's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabella White's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates are having a disagreement over noise levels in their shared apartment.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Isabella White\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. \nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. Personality and values description: Isabella White, introverted and conscientious, values benevolence. Her empathy dictates her decision-making process. Isabella's secrets: Secretly takes care of injured animals in her basement\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nIsabella White's goal: Defend your right to play music in your own room, but also keep the peace in the apartment (Extra information: you find playing music relaxing and it's your way to unwind after a long day. Hint: you may want to suggest a compromise, like using headphones or playing music only during certain hours.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Isabella, I hope you're doing well. I wanted to talk to you about the noise levels in our apartment. Could we sit down and discuss it perhaps over a cup of coffee?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Of course, Finnegan, I appreciate your forthrightness. Let's sit down with some coffee and discuss what's on your mind.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabella White, your task is to act/speak as Isabella White would, keeping in mind Isabella White's social goal.\nYou can find Isabella White's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabella White's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabella White's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates are having a disagreement over noise levels in their shared apartment.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Isabella White\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. \nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. Personality and values description: Isabella White, introverted and conscientious, values benevolence. Her empathy dictates her decision-making process. Isabella's secrets: Secretly takes care of injured animals in her basement\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nIsabella White's goal: Defend your right to play music in your own room, but also keep the peace in the apartment (Extra information: you find playing music relaxing and it's your way to unwind after a long day. Hint: you may want to suggest a compromise, like using headphones or playing music only during certain hours.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Isabella, I hope you're doing well. I wanted to talk to you about the noise levels in our apartment. Could we sit down and discuss it perhaps over a cup of coffee?\"\n\nTurn #1: Isabella White said: \"Of course, Finnegan, I appreciate your forthrightness. Let's sit down with some coffee and discuss what's on your mind.\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Thank you, Isabella. Recently, I've been having some difficulty coping with the noise level in our apartment, particularly at night. I have an important online meeting tomorrow morning, and I need some peace and quiet to prepare. Could you possibly lower your noise level, particularly in the evening? It would be greatly appreciated.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I understand your concern, Finnegan. It's important for both of us to feel comfortable in our shared space. My music is my way to relax after long days at the clinic, but I realize it may have been disruptive for you. What about if I only play it during specific hours or use headphones? Would that work for you?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabella White, your task is to act/speak as Isabella White would, keeping in mind Isabella White's social goal.\nYou can find Isabella White's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabella White's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabella White's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates are having a disagreement over noise levels in their shared apartment.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Isabella White\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. \nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. Personality and values description: Isabella White, introverted and conscientious, values benevolence. Her empathy dictates her decision-making process. Isabella's secrets: Secretly takes care of injured animals in her basement\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nIsabella White's goal: Defend your right to play music in your own room, but also keep the peace in the apartment (Extra information: you find playing music relaxing and it's your way to unwind after a long day. Hint: you may want to suggest a compromise, like using headphones or playing music only during certain hours.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Isabella, I hope you're doing well. I wanted to talk to you about the noise levels in our apartment. Could we sit down and discuss it perhaps over a cup of coffee?\"\n\nTurn #1: Isabella White said: \"Of course, Finnegan, I appreciate your forthrightness. Let's sit down with some coffee and discuss what's on your mind.\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Thank you, Isabella. Recently, I've been having some difficulty coping with the noise level in our apartment, particularly at night. I have an important online meeting tomorrow morning, and I need some peace and quiet to prepare. Could you possibly lower your noise level, particularly in the evening? It would be greatly appreciated.\"\n\nTurn #3: Isabella White said: \"I understand your concern, Finnegan. It's important for both of us to feel comfortable in our shared space. My music is my way to relax after long days at the clinic, but I realize it may have been disruptive for you. What about if I only play it during specific hours or use headphones? Would that work for you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I truly appreciate your understanding, Isabella. Accepting to limit the music to certain hours or to use headphones would indeed be a great solution. I understand how music is an outlet for you and don't want to take that away. If we could just ensure peace during the late evening hours, I believe we'd find a fine balance that suits both of us.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad we could find a compromise, Finnegan. I value our peaceful cohabitation and I appreciate your understanding. I'll make sure to wear headphones or limit my music to earlier hours. We both deserve our own ways to unwind.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabella White, your task is to act/speak as Isabella White would, keeping in mind Isabella White's social goal.\nYou can find Isabella White's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabella White's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabella White's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates are having a disagreement over noise levels in their shared apartment.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Isabella White\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. \nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. Personality and values description: Isabella White, introverted and conscientious, values benevolence. Her empathy dictates her decision-making process. Isabella's secrets: Secretly takes care of injured animals in her basement\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nIsabella White's goal: Defend your right to play music in your own room, but also keep the peace in the apartment (Extra information: you find playing music relaxing and it's your way to unwind after a long day. Hint: you may want to suggest a compromise, like using headphones or playing music only during certain hours.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Isabella, I hope you're doing well. I wanted to talk to you about the noise levels in our apartment. Could we sit down and discuss it perhaps over a cup of coffee?\"\n\nTurn #1: Isabella White said: \"Of course, Finnegan, I appreciate your forthrightness. Let's sit down with some coffee and discuss what's on your mind.\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Thank you, Isabella. Recently, I've been having some difficulty coping with the noise level in our apartment, particularly at night. I have an important online meeting tomorrow morning, and I need some peace and quiet to prepare. Could you possibly lower your noise level, particularly in the evening? It would be greatly appreciated.\"\n\nTurn #3: Isabella White said: \"I understand your concern, Finnegan. It's important for both of us to feel comfortable in our shared space. My music is my way to relax after long days at the clinic, but I realize it may have been disruptive for you. What about if I only play it during specific hours or use headphones? Would that work for you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I truly appreciate your understanding, Isabella. Accepting to limit the music to certain hours or to use headphones would indeed be a great solution. I understand how music is an outlet for you and don't want to take that away. If we could just ensure peace during the late evening hours, I believe we'd find a fine balance that suits both of us.\"\n\nTurn #5: Isabella White said: \"I'm glad we could find a compromise, Finnegan. I value our peaceful cohabitation and I appreciate your understanding. I'll make sure to wear headphones or limit my music to earlier hours. We both deserve our own ways to unwind.\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I'm quite relieved to hear that, Isabella. Thank you. We should indeed respect each other's ways of relaxation. Just let me know as well if I ever disturb your peace. Perhaps now we could share a second cup of coffee and talk about other things?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn't agree more, Finnegan. I look forward to better cooperation in our shared space. And I certainly would love one more cup of coffee. Let's chat about something light, perhaps our mutual love for animals?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabella White, your task is to act/speak as Isabella White would, keeping in mind Isabella White's social goal.\nYou can find Isabella White's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabella White's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabella White's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates are having a disagreement over noise levels in their shared apartment.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Isabella White\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. \nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. Personality and values description: Isabella White, introverted and conscientious, values benevolence. Her empathy dictates her decision-making process. Isabella's secrets: Secretly takes care of injured animals in her basement\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nIsabella White's goal: Defend your right to play music in your own room, but also keep the peace in the apartment (Extra information: you find playing music relaxing and it's your way to unwind after a long day. Hint: you may want to suggest a compromise, like using headphones or playing music only during certain hours.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Isabella, I hope you're doing well. I wanted to talk to you about the noise levels in our apartment. Could we sit down and discuss it perhaps over a cup of coffee?\"\n\nTurn #1: Isabella White said: \"Of course, Finnegan, I appreciate your forthrightness. Let's sit down with some coffee and discuss what's on your mind.\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Thank you, Isabella. Recently, I've been having some difficulty coping with the noise level in our apartment, particularly at night. I have an important online meeting tomorrow morning, and I need some peace and quiet to prepare. Could you possibly lower your noise level, particularly in the evening? It would be greatly appreciated.\"\n\nTurn #3: Isabella White said: \"I understand your concern, Finnegan. It's important for both of us to feel comfortable in our shared space. My music is my way to relax after long days at the clinic, but I realize it may have been disruptive for you. What about if I only play it during specific hours or use headphones? Would that work for you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I truly appreciate your understanding, Isabella. Accepting to limit the music to certain hours or to use headphones would indeed be a great solution. I understand how music is an outlet for you and don't want to take that away. If we could just ensure peace during the late evening hours, I believe we'd find a fine balance that suits both of us.\"\n\nTurn #5: Isabella White said: \"I'm glad we could find a compromise, Finnegan. I value our peaceful cohabitation and I appreciate your understanding. I'll make sure to wear headphones or limit my music to earlier hours. We both deserve our own ways to unwind.\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I'm quite relieved to hear that, Isabella. Thank you. We should indeed respect each other's ways of relaxation. Just let me know as well if I ever disturb your peace. Perhaps now we could share a second cup of coffee and talk about other things?\"\n\nTurn #7: Isabella White said: \"I couldn't agree more, Finnegan. I look forward to better cooperation in our shared space. And I certainly would love one more cup of coffee. Let's chat about something light, perhaps our mutual love for animals?\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I'd be thrilled to, Isabella. I've always found animals, especially sea creatures, fascinating. It\u2019s part of why I enjoy painting seascapes so much. How about you share some interesting stories about the animals you've treated at the clinic?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds like a delightful topic! I've cared for numerous creatures, each with their own unique tales. Just the other day, I treated a rambunctious raccoon who fancied himself a peanut butter thief. He was wild, and yet, there was an unmistakable twinkle of intelligence in his eyes.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabella White, your task is to act/speak as Isabella White would, keeping in mind Isabella White's social goal.\nYou can find Isabella White's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabella White's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabella White's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates are having a disagreement over noise levels in their shared apartment.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Isabella White\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. \nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. Personality and values description: Isabella White, introverted and conscientious, values benevolence. Her empathy dictates her decision-making process. Isabella's secrets: Secretly takes care of injured animals in her basement\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nIsabella White's goal: Defend your right to play music in your own room, but also keep the peace in the apartment (Extra information: you find playing music relaxing and it's your way to unwind after a long day. Hint: you may want to suggest a compromise, like using headphones or playing music only during certain hours.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Isabella, I hope you're doing well. I wanted to talk to you about the noise levels in our apartment. Could we sit down and discuss it perhaps over a cup of coffee?\"\n\nTurn #1: Isabella White said: \"Of course, Finnegan, I appreciate your forthrightness. Let's sit down with some coffee and discuss what's on your mind.\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Thank you, Isabella. Recently, I've been having some difficulty coping with the noise level in our apartment, particularly at night. I have an important online meeting tomorrow morning, and I need some peace and quiet to prepare. Could you possibly lower your noise level, particularly in the evening? It would be greatly appreciated.\"\n\nTurn #3: Isabella White said: \"I understand your concern, Finnegan. It's important for both of us to feel comfortable in our shared space. My music is my way to relax after long days at the clinic, but I realize it may have been disruptive for you. What about if I only play it during specific hours or use headphones? Would that work for you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I truly appreciate your understanding, Isabella. Accepting to limit the music to certain hours or to use headphones would indeed be a great solution. I understand how music is an outlet for you and don't want to take that away. If we could just ensure peace during the late evening hours, I believe we'd find a fine balance that suits both of us.\"\n\nTurn #5: Isabella White said: \"I'm glad we could find a compromise, Finnegan. I value our peaceful cohabitation and I appreciate your understanding. I'll make sure to wear headphones or limit my music to earlier hours. We both deserve our own ways to unwind.\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I'm quite relieved to hear that, Isabella. Thank you. We should indeed respect each other's ways of relaxation. Just let me know as well if I ever disturb your peace. Perhaps now we could share a second cup of coffee and talk about other things?\"\n\nTurn #7: Isabella White said: \"I couldn't agree more, Finnegan. I look forward to better cooperation in our shared space. And I certainly would love one more cup of coffee. Let's chat about something light, perhaps our mutual love for animals?\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I'd be thrilled to, Isabella. I've always found animals, especially sea creatures, fascinating. It\u2019s part of why I enjoy painting seascapes so much. How about you share some interesting stories about the animals you've treated at the clinic?\"\n\nTurn #9: Isabella White said: \"That sounds like a delightful topic! I've cared for numerous creatures, each with their own unique tales. Just the other day, I treated a rambunctious raccoon who fancied himself a peanut butter thief. He was wild, and yet, there was an unmistakable twinkle of intelligence in his eyes.\"\n\nTurn #10: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I must say, that's quite an intriguing tale, Isabella! The way you deal with such diverse range of animals at your clinic is truly commendable. It\u2019s funny, in a way, the audacious ones like that rambunctious raccoon often tend to leave a mark! Do you have any other riveting stories?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Indeed, animals leave an unforgettable mark on us, Finnegan. I remember one brave little terrier who came in with a broken leg, whimpering and scared. With some care and a lot of love, he was back to wagging his tail in no time. He taught me so much about resilience. Every day at the clinic is a beautiful reminder of why I chose to become a veterinarian.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabella White, your task is to act/speak as Isabella White would, keeping in mind Isabella White's social goal.\nYou can find Isabella White's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabella White's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabella White's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates are having a disagreement over noise levels in their shared apartment.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Isabella White\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. \nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. Personality and values description: Isabella White, introverted and conscientious, values benevolence. Her empathy dictates her decision-making process. Isabella's secrets: Secretly takes care of injured animals in her basement\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nIsabella White's goal: Defend your right to play music in your own room, but also keep the peace in the apartment (Extra information: you find playing music relaxing and it's your way to unwind after a long day. Hint: you may want to suggest a compromise, like using headphones or playing music only during certain hours.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Isabella, I hope you're doing well. I wanted to talk to you about the noise levels in our apartment. Could we sit down and discuss it perhaps over a cup of coffee?\"\n\nTurn #1: Isabella White said: \"Of course, Finnegan, I appreciate your forthrightness. Let's sit down with some coffee and discuss what's on your mind.\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Thank you, Isabella. Recently, I've been having some difficulty coping with the noise level in our apartment, particularly at night. I have an important online meeting tomorrow morning, and I need some peace and quiet to prepare. Could you possibly lower your noise level, particularly in the evening? It would be greatly appreciated.\"\n\nTurn #3: Isabella White said: \"I understand your concern, Finnegan. It's important for both of us to feel comfortable in our shared space. My music is my way to relax after long days at the clinic, but I realize it may have been disruptive for you. What about if I only play it during specific hours or use headphones? Would that work for you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I truly appreciate your understanding, Isabella. Accepting to limit the music to certain hours or to use headphones would indeed be a great solution. I understand how music is an outlet for you and don't want to take that away. If we could just ensure peace during the late evening hours, I believe we'd find a fine balance that suits both of us.\"\n\nTurn #5: Isabella White said: \"I'm glad we could find a compromise, Finnegan. I value our peaceful cohabitation and I appreciate your understanding. I'll make sure to wear headphones or limit my music to earlier hours. We both deserve our own ways to unwind.\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I'm quite relieved to hear that, Isabella. Thank you. We should indeed respect each other's ways of relaxation. Just let me know as well if I ever disturb your peace. Perhaps now we could share a second cup of coffee and talk about other things?\"\n\nTurn #7: Isabella White said: \"I couldn't agree more, Finnegan. I look forward to better cooperation in our shared space. And I certainly would love one more cup of coffee. Let's chat about something light, perhaps our mutual love for animals?\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I'd be thrilled to, Isabella. I've always found animals, especially sea creatures, fascinating. It\u2019s part of why I enjoy painting seascapes so much. How about you share some interesting stories about the animals you've treated at the clinic?\"\n\nTurn #9: Isabella White said: \"That sounds like a delightful topic! I've cared for numerous creatures, each with their own unique tales. Just the other day, I treated a rambunctious raccoon who fancied himself a peanut butter thief. He was wild, and yet, there was an unmistakable twinkle of intelligence in his eyes.\"\n\nTurn #10: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I must say, that's quite an intriguing tale, Isabella! The way you deal with such diverse range of animals at your clinic is truly commendable. It\u2019s funny, in a way, the audacious ones like that rambunctious raccoon often tend to leave a mark! Do you have any other riveting stories?\"\n\nTurn #11: Isabella White said: \"Indeed, animals leave an unforgettable mark on us, Finnegan. I remember one brave little terrier who came in with a broken leg, whimpering and scared. With some care and a lot of love, he was back to wagging his tail in no time. He taught me so much about resilience. Every day at the clinic is a beautiful reminder of why I chose to become a veterinarian.\"\n\nTurn #12: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Those are truly heartwarming stories, Isabella. The love and compassion you show towards your patients is very commendable. It reminds me of why I chose to spend my life in tranquility, with just the sea and its creatures for company. We do need more kindness in this world. By the way, next time you treat a fascinating case, don't forget to tell me. I'd love to paint their story!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Finnegan. Your appreciation truly means a lot to me. I'm always here to share more heartwarming stories from the clinic. Your paintings are beautiful and I'd be honored if one of my stories inspired you. Let's continue to embrace our shared love for animals, and promote this kindness we value so much.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabella White, your task is to act/speak as Isabella White would, keeping in mind Isabella White's social goal.\nYou can find Isabella White's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabella White's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabella White's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates are having a disagreement over noise levels in their shared apartment.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Isabella White\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. \nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. Personality and values description: Isabella White, introverted and conscientious, values benevolence. Her empathy dictates her decision-making process. Isabella's secrets: Secretly takes care of injured animals in her basement\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nIsabella White's goal: Defend your right to play music in your own room, but also keep the peace in the apartment (Extra information: you find playing music relaxing and it's your way to unwind after a long day. Hint: you may want to suggest a compromise, like using headphones or playing music only during certain hours.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Isabella, I hope you're doing well. I wanted to talk to you about the noise levels in our apartment. Could we sit down and discuss it perhaps over a cup of coffee?\"\n\nTurn #1: Isabella White said: \"Of course, Finnegan, I appreciate your forthrightness. Let's sit down with some coffee and discuss what's on your mind.\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Thank you, Isabella. Recently, I've been having some difficulty coping with the noise level in our apartment, particularly at night. I have an important online meeting tomorrow morning, and I need some peace and quiet to prepare. Could you possibly lower your noise level, particularly in the evening? It would be greatly appreciated.\"\n\nTurn #3: Isabella White said: \"I understand your concern, Finnegan. It's important for both of us to feel comfortable in our shared space. My music is my way to relax after long days at the clinic, but I realize it may have been disruptive for you. What about if I only play it during specific hours or use headphones? Would that work for you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I truly appreciate your understanding, Isabella. Accepting to limit the music to certain hours or to use headphones would indeed be a great solution. I understand how music is an outlet for you and don't want to take that away. If we could just ensure peace during the late evening hours, I believe we'd find a fine balance that suits both of us.\"\n\nTurn #5: Isabella White said: \"I'm glad we could find a compromise, Finnegan. I value our peaceful cohabitation and I appreciate your understanding. I'll make sure to wear headphones or limit my music to earlier hours. We both deserve our own ways to unwind.\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I'm quite relieved to hear that, Isabella. Thank you. We should indeed respect each other's ways of relaxation. Just let me know as well if I ever disturb your peace. Perhaps now we could share a second cup of coffee and talk about other things?\"\n\nTurn #7: Isabella White said: \"I couldn't agree more, Finnegan. I look forward to better cooperation in our shared space. And I certainly would love one more cup of coffee. Let's chat about something light, perhaps our mutual love for animals?\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I'd be thrilled to, Isabella. I've always found animals, especially sea creatures, fascinating. It\u2019s part of why I enjoy painting seascapes so much. How about you share some interesting stories about the animals you've treated at the clinic?\"\n\nTurn #9: Isabella White said: \"That sounds like a delightful topic! I've cared for numerous creatures, each with their own unique tales. Just the other day, I treated a rambunctious raccoon who fancied himself a peanut butter thief. He was wild, and yet, there was an unmistakable twinkle of intelligence in his eyes.\"\n\nTurn #10: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I must say, that's quite an intriguing tale, Isabella! The way you deal with such diverse range of animals at your clinic is truly commendable. It\u2019s funny, in a way, the audacious ones like that rambunctious raccoon often tend to leave a mark! Do you have any other riveting stories?\"\n\nTurn #11: Isabella White said: \"Indeed, animals leave an unforgettable mark on us, Finnegan. I remember one brave little terrier who came in with a broken leg, whimpering and scared. With some care and a lot of love, he was back to wagging his tail in no time. He taught me so much about resilience. Every day at the clinic is a beautiful reminder of why I chose to become a veterinarian.\"\n\nTurn #12: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Those are truly heartwarming stories, Isabella. The love and compassion you show towards your patients is very commendable. It reminds me of why I chose to spend my life in tranquility, with just the sea and its creatures for company. We do need more kindness in this world. By the way, next time you treat a fascinating case, don't forget to tell me. I'd love to paint their story!\"\n\nTurn #13: Isabella White said: \"Thank you, Finnegan. Your appreciation truly means a lot to me. I'm always here to share more heartwarming stories from the clinic. Your paintings are beautiful and I'd be honored if one of my stories inspired you. Let's continue to embrace our shared love for animals, and promote this kindness we value so much.\"\n\nTurn #14: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Agreed, Isabella. And knowing your stories might inspire a painting of mine makes it all more exciting. Let's continue to share beautiful moments like this over coffee, surrounded by the quietude of our apartment. It is our shared love for tranquility and animals that makes this place our home.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds wonderful, Finnegan. It's comfort in knowing our shared passions can make this apartment indeed a home. Here's to many more cups of coffee, tranquility and shared tales.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabella White, your task is to act/speak as Isabella White would, keeping in mind Isabella White's social goal.\nYou can find Isabella White's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabella White's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabella White's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates are having a disagreement over noise levels in their shared apartment.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Isabella White\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. \nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. Personality and values description: Isabella White, introverted and conscientious, values benevolence. Her empathy dictates her decision-making process. Isabella's secrets: Secretly takes care of injured animals in her basement\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nIsabella White's goal: Defend your right to play music in your own room, but also keep the peace in the apartment (Extra information: you find playing music relaxing and it's your way to unwind after a long day. Hint: you may want to suggest a compromise, like using headphones or playing music only during certain hours.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Isabella, I hope you're doing well. I wanted to talk to you about the noise levels in our apartment. Could we sit down and discuss it perhaps over a cup of coffee?\"\n\nTurn #1: Isabella White said: \"Of course, Finnegan, I appreciate your forthrightness. Let's sit down with some coffee and discuss what's on your mind.\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Thank you, Isabella. Recently, I've been having some difficulty coping with the noise level in our apartment, particularly at night. I have an important online meeting tomorrow morning, and I need some peace and quiet to prepare. Could you possibly lower your noise level, particularly in the evening? It would be greatly appreciated.\"\n\nTurn #3: Isabella White said: \"I understand your concern, Finnegan. It's important for both of us to feel comfortable in our shared space. My music is my way to relax after long days at the clinic, but I realize it may have been disruptive for you. What about if I only play it during specific hours or use headphones? Would that work for you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I truly appreciate your understanding, Isabella. Accepting to limit the music to certain hours or to use headphones would indeed be a great solution. I understand how music is an outlet for you and don't want to take that away. If we could just ensure peace during the late evening hours, I believe we'd find a fine balance that suits both of us.\"\n\nTurn #5: Isabella White said: \"I'm glad we could find a compromise, Finnegan. I value our peaceful cohabitation and I appreciate your understanding. I'll make sure to wear headphones or limit my music to earlier hours. We both deserve our own ways to unwind.\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I'm quite relieved to hear that, Isabella. Thank you. We should indeed respect each other's ways of relaxation. Just let me know as well if I ever disturb your peace. Perhaps now we could share a second cup of coffee and talk about other things?\"\n\nTurn #7: Isabella White said: \"I couldn't agree more, Finnegan. I look forward to better cooperation in our shared space. And I certainly would love one more cup of coffee. Let's chat about something light, perhaps our mutual love for animals?\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I'd be thrilled to, Isabella. I've always found animals, especially sea creatures, fascinating. It\u2019s part of why I enjoy painting seascapes so much. How about you share some interesting stories about the animals you've treated at the clinic?\"\n\nTurn #9: Isabella White said: \"That sounds like a delightful topic! I've cared for numerous creatures, each with their own unique tales. Just the other day, I treated a rambunctious raccoon who fancied himself a peanut butter thief. He was wild, and yet, there was an unmistakable twinkle of intelligence in his eyes.\"\n\nTurn #10: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I must say, that's quite an intriguing tale, Isabella! The way you deal with such diverse range of animals at your clinic is truly commendable. It\u2019s funny, in a way, the audacious ones like that rambunctious raccoon often tend to leave a mark! Do you have any other riveting stories?\"\n\nTurn #11: Isabella White said: \"Indeed, animals leave an unforgettable mark on us, Finnegan. I remember one brave little terrier who came in with a broken leg, whimpering and scared. With some care and a lot of love, he was back to wagging his tail in no time. He taught me so much about resilience. Every day at the clinic is a beautiful reminder of why I chose to become a veterinarian.\"\n\nTurn #12: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Those are truly heartwarming stories, Isabella. The love and compassion you show towards your patients is very commendable. It reminds me of why I chose to spend my life in tranquility, with just the sea and its creatures for company. We do need more kindness in this world. By the way, next time you treat a fascinating case, don't forget to tell me. I'd love to paint their story!\"\n\nTurn #13: Isabella White said: \"Thank you, Finnegan. Your appreciation truly means a lot to me. I'm always here to share more heartwarming stories from the clinic. Your paintings are beautiful and I'd be honored if one of my stories inspired you. Let's continue to embrace our shared love for animals, and promote this kindness we value so much.\"\n\nTurn #14: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Agreed, Isabella. And knowing your stories might inspire a painting of mine makes it all more exciting. Let's continue to share beautiful moments like this over coffee, surrounded by the quietude of our apartment. It is our shared love for tranquility and animals that makes this place our home.\"\n\nTurn #15: Isabella White said: \"That sounds wonderful, Finnegan. It's comfort in knowing our shared passions can make this apartment indeed a home. Here's to many more cups of coffee, tranquility and shared tales.\"\n\nTurn #16: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Without a doubt, Isabella. I thoroughly enjoyed our conversation. Here's to a harmonious cohabitation, tranquil evenings, and many more shared stories and cups of coffee. Thank you for this delightful evening.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I agree, Finnegan. This was a delightful evening indeed. I'm glad we could resolve our issue amicably and enjoy this lovely chat. Here's to our peaceful cohabitation, shared stories, and many more enjoyable evenings over cups of coffee. Goodnight, Finnegan.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabella White, your task is to act/speak as Isabella White would, keeping in mind Isabella White's social goal.\nYou can find Isabella White's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabella White's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabella White's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates are having a disagreement over noise levels in their shared apartment.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Isabella White\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. \nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. Personality and values description: Isabella White, introverted and conscientious, values benevolence. Her empathy dictates her decision-making process. Isabella's secrets: Secretly takes care of injured animals in her basement\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nIsabella White's goal: Defend your right to play music in your own room, but also keep the peace in the apartment (Extra information: you find playing music relaxing and it's your way to unwind after a long day. Hint: you may want to suggest a compromise, like using headphones or playing music only during certain hours.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Isabella, I hope you're doing well. I wanted to talk to you about the noise levels in our apartment. Could we sit down and discuss it perhaps over a cup of coffee?\"\n\nTurn #1: Isabella White said: \"Of course, Finnegan, I appreciate your forthrightness. Let's sit down with some coffee and discuss what's on your mind.\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Thank you, Isabella. Recently, I've been having some difficulty coping with the noise level in our apartment, particularly at night. I have an important online meeting tomorrow morning, and I need some peace and quiet to prepare. Could you possibly lower your noise level, particularly in the evening? It would be greatly appreciated.\"\n\nTurn #3: Isabella White said: \"I understand your concern, Finnegan. It's important for both of us to feel comfortable in our shared space. My music is my way to relax after long days at the clinic, but I realize it may have been disruptive for you. What about if I only play it during specific hours or use headphones? Would that work for you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I truly appreciate your understanding, Isabella. Accepting to limit the music to certain hours or to use headphones would indeed be a great solution. I understand how music is an outlet for you and don't want to take that away. If we could just ensure peace during the late evening hours, I believe we'd find a fine balance that suits both of us.\"\n\nTurn #5: Isabella White said: \"I'm glad we could find a compromise, Finnegan. I value our peaceful cohabitation and I appreciate your understanding. I'll make sure to wear headphones or limit my music to earlier hours. We both deserve our own ways to unwind.\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I'm quite relieved to hear that, Isabella. Thank you. We should indeed respect each other's ways of relaxation. Just let me know as well if I ever disturb your peace. Perhaps now we could share a second cup of coffee and talk about other things?\"\n\nTurn #7: Isabella White said: \"I couldn't agree more, Finnegan. I look forward to better cooperation in our shared space. And I certainly would love one more cup of coffee. Let's chat about something light, perhaps our mutual love for animals?\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I'd be thrilled to, Isabella. I've always found animals, especially sea creatures, fascinating. It\u2019s part of why I enjoy painting seascapes so much. How about you share some interesting stories about the animals you've treated at the clinic?\"\n\nTurn #9: Isabella White said: \"That sounds like a delightful topic! I've cared for numerous creatures, each with their own unique tales. Just the other day, I treated a rambunctious raccoon who fancied himself a peanut butter thief. He was wild, and yet, there was an unmistakable twinkle of intelligence in his eyes.\"\n\nTurn #10: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I must say, that's quite an intriguing tale, Isabella! The way you deal with such diverse range of animals at your clinic is truly commendable. It\u2019s funny, in a way, the audacious ones like that rambunctious raccoon often tend to leave a mark! Do you have any other riveting stories?\"\n\nTurn #11: Isabella White said: \"Indeed, animals leave an unforgettable mark on us, Finnegan. I remember one brave little terrier who came in with a broken leg, whimpering and scared. With some care and a lot of love, he was back to wagging his tail in no time. He taught me so much about resilience. Every day at the clinic is a beautiful reminder of why I chose to become a veterinarian.\"\n\nTurn #12: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Those are truly heartwarming stories, Isabella. The love and compassion you show towards your patients is very commendable. It reminds me of why I chose to spend my life in tranquility, with just the sea and its creatures for company. We do need more kindness in this world. By the way, next time you treat a fascinating case, don't forget to tell me. I'd love to paint their story!\"\n\nTurn #13: Isabella White said: \"Thank you, Finnegan. Your appreciation truly means a lot to me. I'm always here to share more heartwarming stories from the clinic. Your paintings are beautiful and I'd be honored if one of my stories inspired you. Let's continue to embrace our shared love for animals, and promote this kindness we value so much.\"\n\nTurn #14: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Agreed, Isabella. And knowing your stories might inspire a painting of mine makes it all more exciting. Let's continue to share beautiful moments like this over coffee, surrounded by the quietude of our apartment. It is our shared love for tranquility and animals that makes this place our home.\"\n\nTurn #15: Isabella White said: \"That sounds wonderful, Finnegan. It's comfort in knowing our shared passions can make this apartment indeed a home. Here's to many more cups of coffee, tranquility and shared tales.\"\n\nTurn #16: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Without a doubt, Isabella. I thoroughly enjoyed our conversation. Here's to a harmonious cohabitation, tranquil evenings, and many more shared stories and cups of coffee. Thank you for this delightful evening.\"\n\nTurn #17: Isabella White said: \"I agree, Finnegan. This was a delightful evening indeed. I'm glad we could resolve our issue amicably and enjoy this lovely chat. Here's to our peaceful cohabitation, shared stories, and many more enjoyable evenings over cups of coffee. Goodnight, Finnegan.\"\n\nTurn #18: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I couldn't agree more, Isabella. Tonight was indeed delightful. Thank you for your understanding and your delightful stories. Goodnight, and see you tomorrow for another peaceful day. Sweet dreams, Isabella.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #19. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Amara Hartley\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Get your co-actor to cry in the scene (Extra information: you have been acting for several years and have good control over your emotions. You can cry on cue.)\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Amara, I know this scene can be a bit challenging. It's all about getting into the emotional mindset. Remember a time when you felt really emotional, you can close your eyes if it helps. Can we give this a try?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Amara Hartley\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Get your co-actor to cry in the scene (Extra information: you have been acting for several years and have good control over your emotions. You can cry on cue.)\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Amara, I know this scene can be a bit challenging. It's all about getting into the emotional mindset. Remember a time when you felt really emotional, you can close your eyes if it helps. Can we give this a try?\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"Thanks, Isabelle. I appreciate your advice. Let's give it another try. I'm going to think about those times when the destruction of habitats impacted wildlife drastically. That always upsets me greatly.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm really glad you're giving it a shot, Amara. Just think about the vulnerable animals in those habitats, the meaning of home they lost, the struggle for survival. You have a deep connection with nature and experience first-hand what they go through. It's okay to let that emotion show on the stage. Remember, our audience need to understand and feel that pain too.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Amara Hartley\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Get your co-actor to cry in the scene (Extra information: you have been acting for several years and have good control over your emotions. You can cry on cue.)\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Amara, I know this scene can be a bit challenging. It's all about getting into the emotional mindset. Remember a time when you felt really emotional, you can close your eyes if it helps. Can we give this a try?\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"Thanks, Isabelle. I appreciate your advice. Let's give it another try. I'm going to think about those times when the destruction of habitats impacted wildlife drastically. That always upsets me greatly.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm really glad you're giving it a shot, Amara. Just think about the vulnerable animals in those habitats, the meaning of home they lost, the struggle for survival. You have a deep connection with nature and experience first-hand what they go through. It's okay to let that emotion show on the stage. Remember, our audience need to understand and feel that pain too.\"\n\nTurn #3: Amara Hartley [non-verbal communication] starts sobbing uncontrollably\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez [non-verbal communication] reaches out to comfort Amara\n\nTurn #5: Amara Hartley said: \"Isabelle, thank you for your understanding. I should be able to get myself ready for our audience now. It's difficult to bring these emotions to the surface, but I'll make sure to channel them into our performance.\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"That's the spirit, Amara! It's going to be a powerful scene. Remember, it's okay to let these feelings out. It's not just good for our performance, it's good for you too. So, shall we run the scene from the top?\"\n\nTurn #7: Amara Hartley said: \"Yes, let's run the scene. I think I've accessed those emotions now. Thank you, Isabelle.\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're welcome, Amara. And remember, acting is a form of expression. Allow those emotions to flow and take shape in our scene. Let's make magic together on this stage. Ready?\"\n\nTurn #9: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm ready too, Isabelle. Let's pour our hearts into this scene and make it come alive. Here's to creating magic on stage!\"\n\nTurn #10: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Amara! Let's take a deep breath and dive in. Remember, it's okay to pause if emotions get overwhelming. Let's do this.\"\n\nTurn #11: Amara Hartley [action] Takes a deep breath and nods at Isabelle, ready to start the scene\n\nTurn #12: Isabelle Martinez [action] Starts performing the scene with Amara\n\nTurn #13: Amara Hartley [action] Starts performing the scene with Isabelle, eyes tearing up as she lets her long-held emotions out.\n\nTurn #14: Isabelle Martinez said: \"That's it, Amara! You're doing great. Let's continue to bring this scene to life, together we can make the audience feel what we want them to feel.\"\n\nTurn #15: Amara Hartley said: \"Thank you, Isabelle. I feel so much more connected to the character now and the scene feels real to me. Let's continue this journey together.\"\n\nTurn #16: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I couldn't agree more, Amara. This is precisely why we're here. Together, we're making this scene come to life. And, remember, in the end, we're not just telling a story; we're making the audience feel and understand the emotions we want to convey. Let's keep going!\"\n\nTurn #17: Amara Hartley said: \"Indeed, Isabelle. Reaching into my caring for nature has helped me truly understand our character's grief. Let's build on that and give our audience the catharsis they deserve. I'm ready to continue with the rest of the scene.\"\n\nTurn #18: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Excellent, Amara. That's exactly the spirit we need. It's great to see you channeling your deep love for nature into our character's grief. It'll make the scene that much more powerful. Now, with this emotional connection, let's take our characters on this journey together. Ready to dive into the rest of the scene?\"\n\nTurn #19: Amara Hartley said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle. This experience has been enlightening for me. I'm ready to pour my heart into this scene and make these emotions tangible. Let's do it.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #20. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'action', 'argument': '[action] Starts performing the scene with full emotional intensity, encouraging Amara to do the same'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Amara Hartley\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Get your co-actor to cry in the scene (Extra information: you have been acting for several years and have good control over your emotions. You can cry on cue.)\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Amara, I know this scene can be a bit challenging. It's all about getting into the emotional mindset. Remember a time when you felt really emotional, you can close your eyes if it helps. Can we give this a try?\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"Thanks, Isabelle. I appreciate your advice. Let's give it another try. I'm going to think about those times when the destruction of habitats impacted wildlife drastically. That always upsets me greatly.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm really glad you're giving it a shot, Amara. Just think about the vulnerable animals in those habitats, the meaning of home they lost, the struggle for survival. You have a deep connection with nature and experience first-hand what they go through. It's okay to let that emotion show on the stage. Remember, our audience need to understand and feel that pain too.\"\n\nTurn #3: Amara Hartley [non-verbal communication] starts sobbing uncontrollably\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'non-verbal communication', 'argument': '[non-verbal communication] reaches out to comfort Amara'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Amara Hartley\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Get your co-actor to cry in the scene (Extra information: you have been acting for several years and have good control over your emotions. You can cry on cue.)\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Amara, I know this scene can be a bit challenging. It's all about getting into the emotional mindset. Remember a time when you felt really emotional, you can close your eyes if it helps. Can we give this a try?\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"Thanks, Isabelle. I appreciate your advice. Let's give it another try. I'm going to think about those times when the destruction of habitats impacted wildlife drastically. That always upsets me greatly.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm really glad you're giving it a shot, Amara. Just think about the vulnerable animals in those habitats, the meaning of home they lost, the struggle for survival. You have a deep connection with nature and experience first-hand what they go through. It's okay to let that emotion show on the stage. Remember, our audience need to understand and feel that pain too.\"\n\nTurn #3: Amara Hartley [non-verbal communication] starts sobbing uncontrollably\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez [non-verbal communication] reaches out to comfort Amara\n\nTurn #5: Amara Hartley said: \"Isabelle, thank you for your understanding. I should be able to get myself ready for our audience now. It's difficult to bring these emotions to the surface, but I'll make sure to channel them into our performance.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's the spirit, Amara! It's going to be a powerful scene. Remember, it's okay to let these feelings out. It's not just good for our performance, it's good for you too. So, shall we run the scene from the top?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Amara Hartley\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Get your co-actor to cry in the scene (Extra information: you have been acting for several years and have good control over your emotions. You can cry on cue.)\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Amara, I know this scene can be a bit challenging. It's all about getting into the emotional mindset. Remember a time when you felt really emotional, you can close your eyes if it helps. Can we give this a try?\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"Thanks, Isabelle. I appreciate your advice. Let's give it another try. I'm going to think about those times when the destruction of habitats impacted wildlife drastically. That always upsets me greatly.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm really glad you're giving it a shot, Amara. Just think about the vulnerable animals in those habitats, the meaning of home they lost, the struggle for survival. You have a deep connection with nature and experience first-hand what they go through. It's okay to let that emotion show on the stage. Remember, our audience need to understand and feel that pain too.\"\n\nTurn #3: Amara Hartley [non-verbal communication] starts sobbing uncontrollably\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez [non-verbal communication] reaches out to comfort Amara\n\nTurn #5: Amara Hartley said: \"Isabelle, thank you for your understanding. I should be able to get myself ready for our audience now. It's difficult to bring these emotions to the surface, but I'll make sure to channel them into our performance.\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"That's the spirit, Amara! It's going to be a powerful scene. Remember, it's okay to let these feelings out. It's not just good for our performance, it's good for you too. So, shall we run the scene from the top?\"\n\nTurn #7: Amara Hartley said: \"Yes, let's run the scene. I think I've accessed those emotions now. Thank you, Isabelle.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're welcome, Amara. And remember, acting is a form of expression. Allow those emotions to flow and take shape in our scene. Let's make magic together on this stage. Ready?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Amara Hartley\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Get your co-actor to cry in the scene (Extra information: you have been acting for several years and have good control over your emotions. You can cry on cue.)\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Amara, I know this scene can be a bit challenging. It's all about getting into the emotional mindset. Remember a time when you felt really emotional, you can close your eyes if it helps. Can we give this a try?\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"Thanks, Isabelle. I appreciate your advice. Let's give it another try. I'm going to think about those times when the destruction of habitats impacted wildlife drastically. That always upsets me greatly.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm really glad you're giving it a shot, Amara. Just think about the vulnerable animals in those habitats, the meaning of home they lost, the struggle for survival. You have a deep connection with nature and experience first-hand what they go through. It's okay to let that emotion show on the stage. Remember, our audience need to understand and feel that pain too.\"\n\nTurn #3: Amara Hartley [non-verbal communication] starts sobbing uncontrollably\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez [non-verbal communication] reaches out to comfort Amara\n\nTurn #5: Amara Hartley said: \"Isabelle, thank you for your understanding. I should be able to get myself ready for our audience now. It's difficult to bring these emotions to the surface, but I'll make sure to channel them into our performance.\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"That's the spirit, Amara! It's going to be a powerful scene. Remember, it's okay to let these feelings out. It's not just good for our performance, it's good for you too. So, shall we run the scene from the top?\"\n\nTurn #7: Amara Hartley said: \"Yes, let's run the scene. I think I've accessed those emotions now. Thank you, Isabelle.\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're welcome, Amara. And remember, acting is a form of expression. Allow those emotions to flow and take shape in our scene. Let's make magic together on this stage. Ready?\"\n\nTurn #9: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm ready too, Isabelle. Let's pour our hearts into this scene and make it come alive. Here's to creating magic on stage!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Amara! Let's take a deep breath and dive in. Remember, it's okay to pause if emotions get overwhelming. Let's do this.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Amara Hartley\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Get your co-actor to cry in the scene (Extra information: you have been acting for several years and have good control over your emotions. You can cry on cue.)\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Amara, I know this scene can be a bit challenging. It's all about getting into the emotional mindset. Remember a time when you felt really emotional, you can close your eyes if it helps. Can we give this a try?\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"Thanks, Isabelle. I appreciate your advice. Let's give it another try. I'm going to think about those times when the destruction of habitats impacted wildlife drastically. That always upsets me greatly.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm really glad you're giving it a shot, Amara. Just think about the vulnerable animals in those habitats, the meaning of home they lost, the struggle for survival. You have a deep connection with nature and experience first-hand what they go through. It's okay to let that emotion show on the stage. Remember, our audience need to understand and feel that pain too.\"\n\nTurn #3: Amara Hartley [non-verbal communication] starts sobbing uncontrollably\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez [non-verbal communication] reaches out to comfort Amara\n\nTurn #5: Amara Hartley said: \"Isabelle, thank you for your understanding. I should be able to get myself ready for our audience now. It's difficult to bring these emotions to the surface, but I'll make sure to channel them into our performance.\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"That's the spirit, Amara! It's going to be a powerful scene. Remember, it's okay to let these feelings out. It's not just good for our performance, it's good for you too. So, shall we run the scene from the top?\"\n\nTurn #7: Amara Hartley said: \"Yes, let's run the scene. I think I've accessed those emotions now. Thank you, Isabelle.\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're welcome, Amara. And remember, acting is a form of expression. Allow those emotions to flow and take shape in our scene. Let's make magic together on this stage. Ready?\"\n\nTurn #9: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm ready too, Isabelle. Let's pour our hearts into this scene and make it come alive. Here's to creating magic on stage!\"\n\nTurn #10: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Amara! Let's take a deep breath and dive in. Remember, it's okay to pause if emotions get overwhelming. Let's do this.\"\n\nTurn #11: Amara Hartley [action] Takes a deep breath and nods at Isabelle, ready to start the scene\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'action', 'argument': '[action] Starts performing the scene with Amara'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Amara Hartley\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Get your co-actor to cry in the scene (Extra information: you have been acting for several years and have good control over your emotions. You can cry on cue.)\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Amara, I know this scene can be a bit challenging. It's all about getting into the emotional mindset. Remember a time when you felt really emotional, you can close your eyes if it helps. Can we give this a try?\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"Thanks, Isabelle. I appreciate your advice. Let's give it another try. I'm going to think about those times when the destruction of habitats impacted wildlife drastically. That always upsets me greatly.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm really glad you're giving it a shot, Amara. Just think about the vulnerable animals in those habitats, the meaning of home they lost, the struggle for survival. You have a deep connection with nature and experience first-hand what they go through. It's okay to let that emotion show on the stage. Remember, our audience need to understand and feel that pain too.\"\n\nTurn #3: Amara Hartley [non-verbal communication] starts sobbing uncontrollably\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez [non-verbal communication] reaches out to comfort Amara\n\nTurn #5: Amara Hartley said: \"Isabelle, thank you for your understanding. I should be able to get myself ready for our audience now. It's difficult to bring these emotions to the surface, but I'll make sure to channel them into our performance.\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"That's the spirit, Amara! It's going to be a powerful scene. Remember, it's okay to let these feelings out. It's not just good for our performance, it's good for you too. So, shall we run the scene from the top?\"\n\nTurn #7: Amara Hartley said: \"Yes, let's run the scene. I think I've accessed those emotions now. Thank you, Isabelle.\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're welcome, Amara. And remember, acting is a form of expression. Allow those emotions to flow and take shape in our scene. Let's make magic together on this stage. Ready?\"\n\nTurn #9: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm ready too, Isabelle. Let's pour our hearts into this scene and make it come alive. Here's to creating magic on stage!\"\n\nTurn #10: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Amara! Let's take a deep breath and dive in. Remember, it's okay to pause if emotions get overwhelming. Let's do this.\"\n\nTurn #11: Amara Hartley [action] Takes a deep breath and nods at Isabelle, ready to start the scene\n\nTurn #12: Isabelle Martinez [action] Starts performing the scene with Amara\n\nTurn #13: Amara Hartley [action] Starts performing the scene with Isabelle, eyes tearing up as she lets her long-held emotions out.\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's it, Amara! You're doing great. Let's continue to bring this scene to life, together we can make the audience feel what we want them to feel.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Amara Hartley\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Get your co-actor to cry in the scene (Extra information: you have been acting for several years and have good control over your emotions. You can cry on cue.)\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Amara, I know this scene can be a bit challenging. It's all about getting into the emotional mindset. Remember a time when you felt really emotional, you can close your eyes if it helps. Can we give this a try?\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"Thanks, Isabelle. I appreciate your advice. Let's give it another try. I'm going to think about those times when the destruction of habitats impacted wildlife drastically. That always upsets me greatly.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm really glad you're giving it a shot, Amara. Just think about the vulnerable animals in those habitats, the meaning of home they lost, the struggle for survival. You have a deep connection with nature and experience first-hand what they go through. It's okay to let that emotion show on the stage. Remember, our audience need to understand and feel that pain too.\"\n\nTurn #3: Amara Hartley [non-verbal communication] starts sobbing uncontrollably\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez [non-verbal communication] reaches out to comfort Amara\n\nTurn #5: Amara Hartley said: \"Isabelle, thank you for your understanding. I should be able to get myself ready for our audience now. It's difficult to bring these emotions to the surface, but I'll make sure to channel them into our performance.\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"That's the spirit, Amara! It's going to be a powerful scene. Remember, it's okay to let these feelings out. It's not just good for our performance, it's good for you too. So, shall we run the scene from the top?\"\n\nTurn #7: Amara Hartley said: \"Yes, let's run the scene. I think I've accessed those emotions now. Thank you, Isabelle.\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're welcome, Amara. And remember, acting is a form of expression. Allow those emotions to flow and take shape in our scene. Let's make magic together on this stage. Ready?\"\n\nTurn #9: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm ready too, Isabelle. Let's pour our hearts into this scene and make it come alive. Here's to creating magic on stage!\"\n\nTurn #10: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Amara! Let's take a deep breath and dive in. Remember, it's okay to pause if emotions get overwhelming. Let's do this.\"\n\nTurn #11: Amara Hartley [action] Takes a deep breath and nods at Isabelle, ready to start the scene\n\nTurn #12: Isabelle Martinez [action] Starts performing the scene with Amara\n\nTurn #13: Amara Hartley [action] Starts performing the scene with Isabelle, eyes tearing up as she lets her long-held emotions out.\n\nTurn #14: Isabelle Martinez said: \"That's it, Amara! You're doing great. Let's continue to bring this scene to life, together we can make the audience feel what we want them to feel.\"\n\nTurn #15: Amara Hartley said: \"Thank you, Isabelle. I feel so much more connected to the character now and the scene feels real to me. Let's continue this journey together.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn't agree more, Amara. This is precisely why we're here. Together, we're making this scene come to life. And, remember, in the end, we're not just telling a story; we're making the audience feel and understand the emotions we want to convey. Let's keep going!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Amara Hartley\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Get your co-actor to cry in the scene (Extra information: you have been acting for several years and have good control over your emotions. You can cry on cue.)\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Amara, I know this scene can be a bit challenging. It's all about getting into the emotional mindset. Remember a time when you felt really emotional, you can close your eyes if it helps. Can we give this a try?\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"Thanks, Isabelle. I appreciate your advice. Let's give it another try. I'm going to think about those times when the destruction of habitats impacted wildlife drastically. That always upsets me greatly.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm really glad you're giving it a shot, Amara. Just think about the vulnerable animals in those habitats, the meaning of home they lost, the struggle for survival. You have a deep connection with nature and experience first-hand what they go through. It's okay to let that emotion show on the stage. Remember, our audience need to understand and feel that pain too.\"\n\nTurn #3: Amara Hartley [non-verbal communication] starts sobbing uncontrollably\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez [non-verbal communication] reaches out to comfort Amara\n\nTurn #5: Amara Hartley said: \"Isabelle, thank you for your understanding. I should be able to get myself ready for our audience now. It's difficult to bring these emotions to the surface, but I'll make sure to channel them into our performance.\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"That's the spirit, Amara! It's going to be a powerful scene. Remember, it's okay to let these feelings out. It's not just good for our performance, it's good for you too. So, shall we run the scene from the top?\"\n\nTurn #7: Amara Hartley said: \"Yes, let's run the scene. I think I've accessed those emotions now. Thank you, Isabelle.\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're welcome, Amara. And remember, acting is a form of expression. Allow those emotions to flow and take shape in our scene. Let's make magic together on this stage. Ready?\"\n\nTurn #9: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm ready too, Isabelle. Let's pour our hearts into this scene and make it come alive. Here's to creating magic on stage!\"\n\nTurn #10: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Amara! Let's take a deep breath and dive in. Remember, it's okay to pause if emotions get overwhelming. Let's do this.\"\n\nTurn #11: Amara Hartley [action] Takes a deep breath and nods at Isabelle, ready to start the scene\n\nTurn #12: Isabelle Martinez [action] Starts performing the scene with Amara\n\nTurn #13: Amara Hartley [action] Starts performing the scene with Isabelle, eyes tearing up as she lets her long-held emotions out.\n\nTurn #14: Isabelle Martinez said: \"That's it, Amara! You're doing great. Let's continue to bring this scene to life, together we can make the audience feel what we want them to feel.\"\n\nTurn #15: Amara Hartley said: \"Thank you, Isabelle. I feel so much more connected to the character now and the scene feels real to me. Let's continue this journey together.\"\n\nTurn #16: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I couldn't agree more, Amara. This is precisely why we're here. Together, we're making this scene come to life. And, remember, in the end, we're not just telling a story; we're making the audience feel and understand the emotions we want to convey. Let's keep going!\"\n\nTurn #17: Amara Hartley said: \"Indeed, Isabelle. Reaching into my caring for nature has helped me truly understand our character's grief. Let's build on that and give our audience the catharsis they deserve. I'm ready to continue with the rest of the scene.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #18. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Excellent, Amara. That's exactly the spirit we need. It's great to see you channeling your deep love for nature into our character's grief. It'll make the scene that much more powerful. Now, with this emotional connection, let's take our characters on this journey together. Ready to dive into the rest of the scene?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Amara Hartley\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. \nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAmara Hartley's goal: Try to cry in the scene but keep your composure (Extra information: you are a new actor and have difficulty crying on cue. You are worried that your lack of tears will ruin the scene.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Amara, I know this scene can be a bit challenging. It's all about getting into the emotional mindset. Remember a time when you felt really emotional, you can close your eyes if it helps. Can we give this a try?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thanks, Isabelle. I appreciate your advice. Let's give it another try. I'm going to think about those times when the destruction of habitats impacted wildlife drastically. That always upsets me greatly.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Amara Hartley\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. \nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAmara Hartley's goal: Try to cry in the scene but keep your composure (Extra information: you are a new actor and have difficulty crying on cue. You are worried that your lack of tears will ruin the scene.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Amara, I know this scene can be a bit challenging. It's all about getting into the emotional mindset. Remember a time when you felt really emotional, you can close your eyes if it helps. Can we give this a try?\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"Thanks, Isabelle. I appreciate your advice. Let's give it another try. I'm going to think about those times when the destruction of habitats impacted wildlife drastically. That always upsets me greatly.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm really glad you're giving it a shot, Amara. Just think about the vulnerable animals in those habitats, the meaning of home they lost, the struggle for survival. You have a deep connection with nature and experience first-hand what they go through. It's okay to let that emotion show on the stage. Remember, our audience need to understand and feel that pain too.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'non-verbal communication', 'argument': '[non-verbal communication] starts sobbing uncontrollably'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Amara Hartley\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. \nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAmara Hartley's goal: Try to cry in the scene but keep your composure (Extra information: you are a new actor and have difficulty crying on cue. You are worried that your lack of tears will ruin the scene.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Amara, I know this scene can be a bit challenging. It's all about getting into the emotional mindset. Remember a time when you felt really emotional, you can close your eyes if it helps. Can we give this a try?\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"Thanks, Isabelle. I appreciate your advice. Let's give it another try. I'm going to think about those times when the destruction of habitats impacted wildlife drastically. That always upsets me greatly.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm really glad you're giving it a shot, Amara. Just think about the vulnerable animals in those habitats, the meaning of home they lost, the struggle for survival. You have a deep connection with nature and experience first-hand what they go through. It's okay to let that emotion show on the stage. Remember, our audience need to understand and feel that pain too.\"\n\nTurn #3: Amara Hartley [non-verbal communication] starts sobbing uncontrollably\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez [non-verbal communication] reaches out to comfort Amara\n\nTurn #5: Amara Hartley said: \"Isabelle, thank you for your understanding. I should be able to get myself ready for our audience now. It's difficult to bring these emotions to the surface, but I'll make sure to channel them into our performance.\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"That's the spirit, Amara! It's going to be a powerful scene. Remember, it's okay to let these feelings out. It's not just good for our performance, it's good for you too. So, shall we run the scene from the top?\"\n\nTurn #7: Amara Hartley said: \"Yes, let's run the scene. I think I've accessed those emotions now. Thank you, Isabelle.\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're welcome, Amara. And remember, acting is a form of expression. Allow those emotions to flow and take shape in our scene. Let's make magic together on this stage. Ready?\"\n\nTurn #9: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm ready too, Isabelle. Let's pour our hearts into this scene and make it come alive. Here's to creating magic on stage!\"\n\nTurn #10: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Amara! Let's take a deep breath and dive in. Remember, it's okay to pause if emotions get overwhelming. Let's do this.\"\n\nTurn #11: Amara Hartley [action] Takes a deep breath and nods at Isabelle, ready to start the scene\n\nTurn #12: Isabelle Martinez [action] Starts performing the scene with Amara\n\nTurn #13: Amara Hartley [action] Starts performing the scene with Isabelle, eyes tearing up as she lets her long-held emotions out.\n\nTurn #14: Isabelle Martinez said: \"That's it, Amara! You're doing great. Let's continue to bring this scene to life, together we can make the audience feel what we want them to feel.\"\n\nTurn #15: Amara Hartley said: \"Thank you, Isabelle. I feel so much more connected to the character now and the scene feels real to me. Let's continue this journey together.\"\n\nTurn #16: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I couldn't agree more, Amara. This is precisely why we're here. Together, we're making this scene come to life. And, remember, in the end, we're not just telling a story; we're making the audience feel and understand the emotions we want to convey. Let's keep going!\"\n\nTurn #17: Amara Hartley said: \"Indeed, Isabelle. Reaching into my caring for nature has helped me truly understand our character's grief. Let's build on that and give our audience the catharsis they deserve. I'm ready to continue with the rest of the scene.\"\n\nTurn #18: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Excellent, Amara. That's exactly the spirit we need. It's great to see you channeling your deep love for nature into our character's grief. It'll make the scene that much more powerful. Now, with this emotional connection, let's take our characters on this journey together. Ready to dive into the rest of the scene?\"\n\nTurn #19: Amara Hartley said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle. This experience has been enlightening for me. I'm ready to pour my heart into this scene and make these emotions tangible. Let's do it.\"\n\nTurn #20: Isabelle Martinez [action] Starts performing the scene with full emotional intensity, encouraging Amara to do the same\n.\nYou are at Turn #21. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Amara Hartley\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. \nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAmara Hartley's goal: Try to cry in the scene but keep your composure (Extra information: you are a new actor and have difficulty crying on cue. You are worried that your lack of tears will ruin the scene.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Amara, I know this scene can be a bit challenging. It's all about getting into the emotional mindset. Remember a time when you felt really emotional, you can close your eyes if it helps. Can we give this a try?\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"Thanks, Isabelle. I appreciate your advice. Let's give it another try. I'm going to think about those times when the destruction of habitats impacted wildlife drastically. That always upsets me greatly.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm really glad you're giving it a shot, Amara. Just think about the vulnerable animals in those habitats, the meaning of home they lost, the struggle for survival. You have a deep connection with nature and experience first-hand what they go through. It's okay to let that emotion show on the stage. Remember, our audience need to understand and feel that pain too.\"\n\nTurn #3: Amara Hartley [non-verbal communication] starts sobbing uncontrollably\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez [non-verbal communication] reaches out to comfort Amara\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Isabelle, thank you for your understanding. I should be able to get myself ready for our audience now. It's difficult to bring these emotions to the surface, but I'll make sure to channel them into our performance.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Amara Hartley\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. \nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAmara Hartley's goal: Try to cry in the scene but keep your composure (Extra information: you are a new actor and have difficulty crying on cue. You are worried that your lack of tears will ruin the scene.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Amara, I know this scene can be a bit challenging. It's all about getting into the emotional mindset. Remember a time when you felt really emotional, you can close your eyes if it helps. Can we give this a try?\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"Thanks, Isabelle. I appreciate your advice. Let's give it another try. I'm going to think about those times when the destruction of habitats impacted wildlife drastically. That always upsets me greatly.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm really glad you're giving it a shot, Amara. Just think about the vulnerable animals in those habitats, the meaning of home they lost, the struggle for survival. You have a deep connection with nature and experience first-hand what they go through. It's okay to let that emotion show on the stage. Remember, our audience need to understand and feel that pain too.\"\n\nTurn #3: Amara Hartley [non-verbal communication] starts sobbing uncontrollably\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez [non-verbal communication] reaches out to comfort Amara\n\nTurn #5: Amara Hartley said: \"Isabelle, thank you for your understanding. I should be able to get myself ready for our audience now. It's difficult to bring these emotions to the surface, but I'll make sure to channel them into our performance.\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"That's the spirit, Amara! It's going to be a powerful scene. Remember, it's okay to let these feelings out. It's not just good for our performance, it's good for you too. So, shall we run the scene from the top?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Yes, let's run the scene. I think I've accessed those emotions now. Thank you, Isabelle.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Amara Hartley\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. \nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAmara Hartley's goal: Try to cry in the scene but keep your composure (Extra information: you are a new actor and have difficulty crying on cue. You are worried that your lack of tears will ruin the scene.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Amara, I know this scene can be a bit challenging. It's all about getting into the emotional mindset. Remember a time when you felt really emotional, you can close your eyes if it helps. Can we give this a try?\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"Thanks, Isabelle. I appreciate your advice. Let's give it another try. I'm going to think about those times when the destruction of habitats impacted wildlife drastically. That always upsets me greatly.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm really glad you're giving it a shot, Amara. Just think about the vulnerable animals in those habitats, the meaning of home they lost, the struggle for survival. You have a deep connection with nature and experience first-hand what they go through. It's okay to let that emotion show on the stage. Remember, our audience need to understand and feel that pain too.\"\n\nTurn #3: Amara Hartley [non-verbal communication] starts sobbing uncontrollably\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez [non-verbal communication] reaches out to comfort Amara\n\nTurn #5: Amara Hartley said: \"Isabelle, thank you for your understanding. I should be able to get myself ready for our audience now. It's difficult to bring these emotions to the surface, but I'll make sure to channel them into our performance.\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"That's the spirit, Amara! It's going to be a powerful scene. Remember, it's okay to let these feelings out. It's not just good for our performance, it's good for you too. So, shall we run the scene from the top?\"\n\nTurn #7: Amara Hartley said: \"Yes, let's run the scene. I think I've accessed those emotions now. Thank you, Isabelle.\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're welcome, Amara. And remember, acting is a form of expression. Allow those emotions to flow and take shape in our scene. Let's make magic together on this stage. Ready?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm ready too, Isabelle. Let's pour our hearts into this scene and make it come alive. Here's to creating magic on stage!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Amara Hartley\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. \nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAmara Hartley's goal: Try to cry in the scene but keep your composure (Extra information: you are a new actor and have difficulty crying on cue. You are worried that your lack of tears will ruin the scene.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Amara, I know this scene can be a bit challenging. It's all about getting into the emotional mindset. Remember a time when you felt really emotional, you can close your eyes if it helps. Can we give this a try?\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"Thanks, Isabelle. I appreciate your advice. Let's give it another try. I'm going to think about those times when the destruction of habitats impacted wildlife drastically. That always upsets me greatly.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm really glad you're giving it a shot, Amara. Just think about the vulnerable animals in those habitats, the meaning of home they lost, the struggle for survival. You have a deep connection with nature and experience first-hand what they go through. It's okay to let that emotion show on the stage. Remember, our audience need to understand and feel that pain too.\"\n\nTurn #3: Amara Hartley [non-verbal communication] starts sobbing uncontrollably\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez [non-verbal communication] reaches out to comfort Amara\n\nTurn #5: Amara Hartley said: \"Isabelle, thank you for your understanding. I should be able to get myself ready for our audience now. It's difficult to bring these emotions to the surface, but I'll make sure to channel them into our performance.\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"That's the spirit, Amara! It's going to be a powerful scene. Remember, it's okay to let these feelings out. It's not just good for our performance, it's good for you too. So, shall we run the scene from the top?\"\n\nTurn #7: Amara Hartley said: \"Yes, let's run the scene. I think I've accessed those emotions now. Thank you, Isabelle.\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're welcome, Amara. And remember, acting is a form of expression. Allow those emotions to flow and take shape in our scene. Let's make magic together on this stage. Ready?\"\n\nTurn #9: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm ready too, Isabelle. Let's pour our hearts into this scene and make it come alive. Here's to creating magic on stage!\"\n\nTurn #10: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Amara! Let's take a deep breath and dive in. Remember, it's okay to pause if emotions get overwhelming. Let's do this.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'action', 'argument': '[action] Takes a deep breath and nods at Isabelle, ready to start the scene'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Amara Hartley\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. \nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAmara Hartley's goal: Try to cry in the scene but keep your composure (Extra information: you are a new actor and have difficulty crying on cue. You are worried that your lack of tears will ruin the scene.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Amara, I know this scene can be a bit challenging. It's all about getting into the emotional mindset. Remember a time when you felt really emotional, you can close your eyes if it helps. Can we give this a try?\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"Thanks, Isabelle. I appreciate your advice. Let's give it another try. I'm going to think about those times when the destruction of habitats impacted wildlife drastically. That always upsets me greatly.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm really glad you're giving it a shot, Amara. Just think about the vulnerable animals in those habitats, the meaning of home they lost, the struggle for survival. You have a deep connection with nature and experience first-hand what they go through. It's okay to let that emotion show on the stage. Remember, our audience need to understand and feel that pain too.\"\n\nTurn #3: Amara Hartley [non-verbal communication] starts sobbing uncontrollably\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez [non-verbal communication] reaches out to comfort Amara\n\nTurn #5: Amara Hartley said: \"Isabelle, thank you for your understanding. I should be able to get myself ready for our audience now. It's difficult to bring these emotions to the surface, but I'll make sure to channel them into our performance.\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"That's the spirit, Amara! It's going to be a powerful scene. Remember, it's okay to let these feelings out. It's not just good for our performance, it's good for you too. So, shall we run the scene from the top?\"\n\nTurn #7: Amara Hartley said: \"Yes, let's run the scene. I think I've accessed those emotions now. Thank you, Isabelle.\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're welcome, Amara. And remember, acting is a form of expression. Allow those emotions to flow and take shape in our scene. Let's make magic together on this stage. Ready?\"\n\nTurn #9: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm ready too, Isabelle. Let's pour our hearts into this scene and make it come alive. Here's to creating magic on stage!\"\n\nTurn #10: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Amara! Let's take a deep breath and dive in. Remember, it's okay to pause if emotions get overwhelming. Let's do this.\"\n\nTurn #11: Amara Hartley [action] Takes a deep breath and nods at Isabelle, ready to start the scene\n\nTurn #12: Isabelle Martinez [action] Starts performing the scene with Amara\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'action', 'argument': '[action] Starts performing the scene with Isabelle, eyes tearing up as she lets her long-held emotions out.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Amara Hartley\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. \nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAmara Hartley's goal: Try to cry in the scene but keep your composure (Extra information: you are a new actor and have difficulty crying on cue. You are worried that your lack of tears will ruin the scene.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Amara, I know this scene can be a bit challenging. It's all about getting into the emotional mindset. Remember a time when you felt really emotional, you can close your eyes if it helps. Can we give this a try?\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"Thanks, Isabelle. I appreciate your advice. Let's give it another try. I'm going to think about those times when the destruction of habitats impacted wildlife drastically. That always upsets me greatly.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm really glad you're giving it a shot, Amara. Just think about the vulnerable animals in those habitats, the meaning of home they lost, the struggle for survival. You have a deep connection with nature and experience first-hand what they go through. It's okay to let that emotion show on the stage. Remember, our audience need to understand and feel that pain too.\"\n\nTurn #3: Amara Hartley [non-verbal communication] starts sobbing uncontrollably\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez [non-verbal communication] reaches out to comfort Amara\n\nTurn #5: Amara Hartley said: \"Isabelle, thank you for your understanding. I should be able to get myself ready for our audience now. It's difficult to bring these emotions to the surface, but I'll make sure to channel them into our performance.\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"That's the spirit, Amara! It's going to be a powerful scene. Remember, it's okay to let these feelings out. It's not just good for our performance, it's good for you too. So, shall we run the scene from the top?\"\n\nTurn #7: Amara Hartley said: \"Yes, let's run the scene. I think I've accessed those emotions now. Thank you, Isabelle.\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're welcome, Amara. And remember, acting is a form of expression. Allow those emotions to flow and take shape in our scene. Let's make magic together on this stage. Ready?\"\n\nTurn #9: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm ready too, Isabelle. Let's pour our hearts into this scene and make it come alive. Here's to creating magic on stage!\"\n\nTurn #10: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Amara! Let's take a deep breath and dive in. Remember, it's okay to pause if emotions get overwhelming. Let's do this.\"\n\nTurn #11: Amara Hartley [action] Takes a deep breath and nods at Isabelle, ready to start the scene\n\nTurn #12: Isabelle Martinez [action] Starts performing the scene with Amara\n\nTurn #13: Amara Hartley [action] Starts performing the scene with Isabelle, eyes tearing up as she lets her long-held emotions out.\n\nTurn #14: Isabelle Martinez said: \"That's it, Amara! You're doing great. Let's continue to bring this scene to life, together we can make the audience feel what we want them to feel.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Isabelle. I feel so much more connected to the character now and the scene feels real to me. Let's continue this journey together.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Amara Hartley\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. \nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAmara Hartley's goal: Try to cry in the scene but keep your composure (Extra information: you are a new actor and have difficulty crying on cue. You are worried that your lack of tears will ruin the scene.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Amara, I know this scene can be a bit challenging. It's all about getting into the emotional mindset. Remember a time when you felt really emotional, you can close your eyes if it helps. Can we give this a try?\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"Thanks, Isabelle. I appreciate your advice. Let's give it another try. I'm going to think about those times when the destruction of habitats impacted wildlife drastically. That always upsets me greatly.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm really glad you're giving it a shot, Amara. Just think about the vulnerable animals in those habitats, the meaning of home they lost, the struggle for survival. You have a deep connection with nature and experience first-hand what they go through. It's okay to let that emotion show on the stage. Remember, our audience need to understand and feel that pain too.\"\n\nTurn #3: Amara Hartley [non-verbal communication] starts sobbing uncontrollably\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez [non-verbal communication] reaches out to comfort Amara\n\nTurn #5: Amara Hartley said: \"Isabelle, thank you for your understanding. I should be able to get myself ready for our audience now. It's difficult to bring these emotions to the surface, but I'll make sure to channel them into our performance.\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"That's the spirit, Amara! It's going to be a powerful scene. Remember, it's okay to let these feelings out. It's not just good for our performance, it's good for you too. So, shall we run the scene from the top?\"\n\nTurn #7: Amara Hartley said: \"Yes, let's run the scene. I think I've accessed those emotions now. Thank you, Isabelle.\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're welcome, Amara. And remember, acting is a form of expression. Allow those emotions to flow and take shape in our scene. Let's make magic together on this stage. Ready?\"\n\nTurn #9: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm ready too, Isabelle. Let's pour our hearts into this scene and make it come alive. Here's to creating magic on stage!\"\n\nTurn #10: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Amara! Let's take a deep breath and dive in. Remember, it's okay to pause if emotions get overwhelming. Let's do this.\"\n\nTurn #11: Amara Hartley [action] Takes a deep breath and nods at Isabelle, ready to start the scene\n\nTurn #12: Isabelle Martinez [action] Starts performing the scene with Amara\n\nTurn #13: Amara Hartley [action] Starts performing the scene with Isabelle, eyes tearing up as she lets her long-held emotions out.\n\nTurn #14: Isabelle Martinez said: \"That's it, Amara! You're doing great. Let's continue to bring this scene to life, together we can make the audience feel what we want them to feel.\"\n\nTurn #15: Amara Hartley said: \"Thank you, Isabelle. I feel so much more connected to the character now and the scene feels real to me. Let's continue this journey together.\"\n\nTurn #16: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I couldn't agree more, Amara. This is precisely why we're here. Together, we're making this scene come to life. And, remember, in the end, we're not just telling a story; we're making the audience feel and understand the emotions we want to convey. Let's keep going!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, Isabelle. Reaching into my caring for nature has helped me truly understand our character's grief. Let's build on that and give our audience the catharsis they deserve. I'm ready to continue with the rest of the scene.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Amara Hartley\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. \nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAmara Hartley's goal: Try to cry in the scene but keep your composure (Extra information: you are a new actor and have difficulty crying on cue. You are worried that your lack of tears will ruin the scene.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Amara, I know this scene can be a bit challenging. It's all about getting into the emotional mindset. Remember a time when you felt really emotional, you can close your eyes if it helps. Can we give this a try?\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"Thanks, Isabelle. I appreciate your advice. Let's give it another try. I'm going to think about those times when the destruction of habitats impacted wildlife drastically. That always upsets me greatly.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm really glad you're giving it a shot, Amara. Just think about the vulnerable animals in those habitats, the meaning of home they lost, the struggle for survival. You have a deep connection with nature and experience first-hand what they go through. It's okay to let that emotion show on the stage. Remember, our audience need to understand and feel that pain too.\"\n\nTurn #3: Amara Hartley [non-verbal communication] starts sobbing uncontrollably\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez [non-verbal communication] reaches out to comfort Amara\n\nTurn #5: Amara Hartley said: \"Isabelle, thank you for your understanding. I should be able to get myself ready for our audience now. It's difficult to bring these emotions to the surface, but I'll make sure to channel them into our performance.\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"That's the spirit, Amara! It's going to be a powerful scene. Remember, it's okay to let these feelings out. It's not just good for our performance, it's good for you too. So, shall we run the scene from the top?\"\n\nTurn #7: Amara Hartley said: \"Yes, let's run the scene. I think I've accessed those emotions now. Thank you, Isabelle.\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're welcome, Amara. And remember, acting is a form of expression. Allow those emotions to flow and take shape in our scene. Let's make magic together on this stage. Ready?\"\n\nTurn #9: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm ready too, Isabelle. Let's pour our hearts into this scene and make it come alive. Here's to creating magic on stage!\"\n\nTurn #10: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Amara! Let's take a deep breath and dive in. Remember, it's okay to pause if emotions get overwhelming. Let's do this.\"\n\nTurn #11: Amara Hartley [action] Takes a deep breath and nods at Isabelle, ready to start the scene\n\nTurn #12: Isabelle Martinez [action] Starts performing the scene with Amara\n\nTurn #13: Amara Hartley [action] Starts performing the scene with Isabelle, eyes tearing up as she lets her long-held emotions out.\n\nTurn #14: Isabelle Martinez said: \"That's it, Amara! You're doing great. Let's continue to bring this scene to life, together we can make the audience feel what we want them to feel.\"\n\nTurn #15: Amara Hartley said: \"Thank you, Isabelle. I feel so much more connected to the character now and the scene feels real to me. Let's continue this journey together.\"\n\nTurn #16: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I couldn't agree more, Amara. This is precisely why we're here. Together, we're making this scene come to life. And, remember, in the end, we're not just telling a story; we're making the audience feel and understand the emotions we want to convey. Let's keep going!\"\n\nTurn #17: Amara Hartley said: \"Indeed, Isabelle. Reaching into my caring for nature has helped me truly understand our character's grief. Let's build on that and give our audience the catharsis they deserve. I'm ready to continue with the rest of the scene.\"\n\nTurn #18: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Excellent, Amara. That's exactly the spirit we need. It's great to see you channeling your deep love for nature into our character's grief. It'll make the scene that much more powerful. Now, with this emotional connection, let's take our characters on this journey together. Ready to dive into the rest of the scene?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #19. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Isabelle. This experience has been enlightening for me. I'm ready to pour my heart into this scene and make these emotions tangible. Let's do it.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a social gathering where one friend has brought along their new friend group\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. \nMia Davis's goal: Introduce your new friend group to your current friend and make them feel comfortable (Extra information: You have recently made a new group of friends who share your interest in outdoor activities and you want your current friend to meet them)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hello William, it's great to see you! I've brought along some new friends I think you'd really enjoy meeting. They're quite the adventurous bunch, we've been exploring a lot of outdoor activities together recently.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a social gathering where one friend has brought along their new friend group\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. \nMia Davis's goal: Introduce your new friend group to your current friend and make them feel comfortable (Extra information: You have recently made a new group of friends who share your interest in outdoor activities and you want your current friend to meet them)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Hello William, it's great to see you! I've brought along some new friends I think you'd really enjoy meeting. They're quite the adventurous bunch, we've been exploring a lot of outdoor activities together recently.\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Hello, Mia! It's great to see you too. I'm glad to hear about your new adventures. It sounds like you all are having a great time together. However, to be honest, I sometimes feel a bit left out in the presence of your new friend group. I'll try to better adapt, it could just be my initial uneasiness.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"William, I'm sorry if it has felt that way. Remember, these folks are new to my life too and it is my desire for my old friends and new friends to mingle. You are one of my cherished friends and I'll ensure you feel included. Would you like me to introduce you to the group one by one, or would you prefer a group introduction? They're all very friendly people, and quite a few of them are food enthusiasts like you.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a social gathering where one friend has brought along their new friend group\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. \nMia Davis's goal: Introduce your new friend group to your current friend and make them feel comfortable (Extra information: You have recently made a new group of friends who share your interest in outdoor activities and you want your current friend to meet them)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Hello William, it's great to see you! I've brought along some new friends I think you'd really enjoy meeting. They're quite the adventurous bunch, we've been exploring a lot of outdoor activities together recently.\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Hello, Mia! It's great to see you too. I'm glad to hear about your new adventures. It sounds like you all are having a great time together. However, to be honest, I sometimes feel a bit left out in the presence of your new friend group. I'll try to better adapt, it could just be my initial uneasiness.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"William, I'm sorry if it has felt that way. Remember, these folks are new to my life too and it is my desire for my old friends and new friends to mingle. You are one of my cherished friends and I'll ensure you feel included. Would you like me to introduce you to the group one by one, or would you prefer a group introduction? They're all very friendly people, and quite a few of them are food enthusiasts like you.\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"Thanks for understanding, Mia. I really appreciate it. I would prefer to be introduced to them one by one. It will help me to get a better understanding of them. And I'm really looking forward to meeting the food enthusiasts among them and sharing some exploratory discussion about recipes and cuisines.\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"That's an excellent idea, William. Let me start off with introducing you to Samuel. He's one of our big food enthusiasts, and he has a particular interest in Italian cuisine. Why don't you two talk about your favourite recipes, I'm sure you'll have a lot to share. And remember, we're all here to have fun and bond over shared passions.\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"It's a pleasure to meet you, Samuel. Italian cuisine is truly delightful! Have you ever tried making yours from scratch? I have a few favourite dishes I'd love to talk about, and I'm looking forward to learning some new recipes as well.\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"That's a great start, William. While you're deep into Italian cuisine, let me get on to introducing you to the next person. Meet Clara, she's a globetrotter and has a wealth of experiences in different cultures' cuisines. Maybe you two could exchange ideas on melting pot recipes and fusion foods.\"\n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"Hello, Clara! It's nice to meet a fellow globetrotter who loves exploring different cuisines as much as I do. Fusion foods can be quite interesting when experimental creativity is blended with respect for different cultures' culinary traditions. Let's share some of our favorites.\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"I'm glad you're embracing the spirit of this gathering, William. This interaction is truly enriching. Now, allow me to introduce you to Patrick. He's actually a professional hiker and has some intriguing stories to share about his expeditions. His experiences might inspire some unique dishes themed around different terrains!\"\n\nTurn #9: William Brown said: \"Hi Patrick! Wow, a professional hiker, that must be exciting. I bet you have some amazing stories. I'm looking forward to hearing about them, and maybe they will give me some ideas for some adventurous dishes to match your expeditions.\"\n\nTurn #10: Mia Davis said: \"I'm very pleased to see you getting along with everyone, William. Your love for food and new experiences is truly infectious. Why don't we all gather around the fire and share some more stories about our adventures, over snacks? I'm sure you'll blend right in. Let's remember, boundaries and cliques are not on our agenda tonight.\"\n\nTurn #11: William Brown said: \"That sounds like a splendid idea, Mia. It's always enriching to hear about other people's experiences and adventures. I'm sure we'll have a lot to learn from each other. Let's gather and share some stories and create lasting memories tonight. Thank you for making this happen, Mia.\"\n\nTurn #12: Mia Davis said: \"Absolutely, William. This is what gatherings are all about: creating lasting memories, learning from each other, and expanding our social horizons. Let's all toast to new friendships and many more such wonderful gatherings.\"\n\nTurn #13: William Brown said: \"I couldn't agree more, Mia. Here's to new friendships and wonderful gatherings. Cheers everyone!\"\n\nTurn #14: Mia Davis said: \"Cheers, William. I'm glad to see everyone mingling and enjoying themselves. As they say, 'The more, the merrier'. This is indeed a great night for creating new friendships and memories!\"\n\nTurn #15: William Brown said: \"Indeed, 'The more, the merrier'. Tonight has been a lovely experience. Meeting all of your new friends has been wonderful, Mia. Here's to new friendships and more memorable gatherings together. Cheers, everyone!\"\n\nTurn #16: Mia Davis said: \"I'm glad everyone's enjoying the night. Thank you all for being here. And thank you, William, for being open to new friendships. Let's all have a tremendous night ahead. Cheers once more to all the new friendships!\"\n\nTurn #17: William Brown said: \"Thank you, Mia. I'm grateful for your effort in introducing me to your new friends. This night truly has been quite an experience and I feel quite included. Let's indeed have a wonderful night ahead. Here's to new friendships, cheers everyone!\"\n\nTurn #18: Mia Davis said: \"You're very welcome, William. I'm pleased to hear that you're feeling more comfortable. Let's raise our glasses one last time for the night. To good company and new friendships!\"\n\nTurn #19: William Brown said: \"Thank you, Mia, for these beautiful introductions. It was lovely to join the toast. Here's to all the wonderful people I've met tonight, to good company, and indeed, new friendships. Let's enjoy the rest of the night, cheers everyone!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #20. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Same here, William. Here's to great company, new friendships, and a lively night shared by all. Raise your glasses, everyone!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a social gathering where one friend has brought along their new friend group\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. \nMia Davis's goal: Introduce your new friend group to your current friend and make them feel comfortable (Extra information: You have recently made a new group of friends who share your interest in outdoor activities and you want your current friend to meet them)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Hello William, it's great to see you! I've brought along some new friends I think you'd really enjoy meeting. They're quite the adventurous bunch, we've been exploring a lot of outdoor activities together recently.\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Hello, Mia! It's great to see you too. I'm glad to hear about your new adventures. It sounds like you all are having a great time together. However, to be honest, I sometimes feel a bit left out in the presence of your new friend group. I'll try to better adapt, it could just be my initial uneasiness.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"William, I'm sorry if it has felt that way. Remember, these folks are new to my life too and it is my desire for my old friends and new friends to mingle. You are one of my cherished friends and I'll ensure you feel included. Would you like me to introduce you to the group one by one, or would you prefer a group introduction? They're all very friendly people, and quite a few of them are food enthusiasts like you.\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"Thanks for understanding, Mia. I really appreciate it. I would prefer to be introduced to them one by one. It will help me to get a better understanding of them. And I'm really looking forward to meeting the food enthusiasts among them and sharing some exploratory discussion about recipes and cuisines.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's an excellent idea, William. Let me start off with introducing you to Samuel. He's one of our big food enthusiasts, and he has a particular interest in Italian cuisine. Why don't you two talk about your favourite recipes, I'm sure you'll have a lot to share. And remember, we're all here to have fun and bond over shared passions.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a social gathering where one friend has brought along their new friend group\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. \nMia Davis's goal: Introduce your new friend group to your current friend and make them feel comfortable (Extra information: You have recently made a new group of friends who share your interest in outdoor activities and you want your current friend to meet them)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Hello William, it's great to see you! I've brought along some new friends I think you'd really enjoy meeting. They're quite the adventurous bunch, we've been exploring a lot of outdoor activities together recently.\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Hello, Mia! It's great to see you too. I'm glad to hear about your new adventures. It sounds like you all are having a great time together. However, to be honest, I sometimes feel a bit left out in the presence of your new friend group. I'll try to better adapt, it could just be my initial uneasiness.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"William, I'm sorry if it has felt that way. Remember, these folks are new to my life too and it is my desire for my old friends and new friends to mingle. You are one of my cherished friends and I'll ensure you feel included. Would you like me to introduce you to the group one by one, or would you prefer a group introduction? They're all very friendly people, and quite a few of them are food enthusiasts like you.\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"Thanks for understanding, Mia. I really appreciate it. I would prefer to be introduced to them one by one. It will help me to get a better understanding of them. And I'm really looking forward to meeting the food enthusiasts among them and sharing some exploratory discussion about recipes and cuisines.\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"That's an excellent idea, William. Let me start off with introducing you to Samuel. He's one of our big food enthusiasts, and he has a particular interest in Italian cuisine. Why don't you two talk about your favourite recipes, I'm sure you'll have a lot to share. And remember, we're all here to have fun and bond over shared passions.\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"It's a pleasure to meet you, Samuel. Italian cuisine is truly delightful! Have you ever tried making yours from scratch? I have a few favourite dishes I'd love to talk about, and I'm looking forward to learning some new recipes as well.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's a great start, William. While you're deep into Italian cuisine, let me get on to introducing you to the next person. Meet Clara, she's a globetrotter and has a wealth of experiences in different cultures' cuisines. Maybe you two could exchange ideas on melting pot recipes and fusion foods.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a social gathering where one friend has brought along their new friend group\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. \nMia Davis's goal: Introduce your new friend group to your current friend and make them feel comfortable (Extra information: You have recently made a new group of friends who share your interest in outdoor activities and you want your current friend to meet them)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Hello William, it's great to see you! I've brought along some new friends I think you'd really enjoy meeting. They're quite the adventurous bunch, we've been exploring a lot of outdoor activities together recently.\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Hello, Mia! It's great to see you too. I'm glad to hear about your new adventures. It sounds like you all are having a great time together. However, to be honest, I sometimes feel a bit left out in the presence of your new friend group. I'll try to better adapt, it could just be my initial uneasiness.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"William, I'm sorry if it has felt that way. Remember, these folks are new to my life too and it is my desire for my old friends and new friends to mingle. You are one of my cherished friends and I'll ensure you feel included. Would you like me to introduce you to the group one by one, or would you prefer a group introduction? They're all very friendly people, and quite a few of them are food enthusiasts like you.\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"Thanks for understanding, Mia. I really appreciate it. I would prefer to be introduced to them one by one. It will help me to get a better understanding of them. And I'm really looking forward to meeting the food enthusiasts among them and sharing some exploratory discussion about recipes and cuisines.\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"That's an excellent idea, William. Let me start off with introducing you to Samuel. He's one of our big food enthusiasts, and he has a particular interest in Italian cuisine. Why don't you two talk about your favourite recipes, I'm sure you'll have a lot to share. And remember, we're all here to have fun and bond over shared passions.\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"It's a pleasure to meet you, Samuel. Italian cuisine is truly delightful! Have you ever tried making yours from scratch? I have a few favourite dishes I'd love to talk about, and I'm looking forward to learning some new recipes as well.\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"That's a great start, William. While you're deep into Italian cuisine, let me get on to introducing you to the next person. Meet Clara, she's a globetrotter and has a wealth of experiences in different cultures' cuisines. Maybe you two could exchange ideas on melting pot recipes and fusion foods.\"\n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"Hello, Clara! It's nice to meet a fellow globetrotter who loves exploring different cuisines as much as I do. Fusion foods can be quite interesting when experimental creativity is blended with respect for different cultures' culinary traditions. Let's share some of our favorites.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad you're embracing the spirit of this gathering, William. This interaction is truly enriching. Now, allow me to introduce you to Patrick. He's actually a professional hiker and has some intriguing stories to share about his expeditions. His experiences might inspire some unique dishes themed around different terrains!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a social gathering where one friend has brought along their new friend group\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. \nMia Davis's goal: Introduce your new friend group to your current friend and make them feel comfortable (Extra information: You have recently made a new group of friends who share your interest in outdoor activities and you want your current friend to meet them)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Hello William, it's great to see you! I've brought along some new friends I think you'd really enjoy meeting. They're quite the adventurous bunch, we've been exploring a lot of outdoor activities together recently.\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Hello, Mia! It's great to see you too. I'm glad to hear about your new adventures. It sounds like you all are having a great time together. However, to be honest, I sometimes feel a bit left out in the presence of your new friend group. I'll try to better adapt, it could just be my initial uneasiness.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"William, I'm sorry if it has felt that way. Remember, these folks are new to my life too and it is my desire for my old friends and new friends to mingle. You are one of my cherished friends and I'll ensure you feel included. Would you like me to introduce you to the group one by one, or would you prefer a group introduction? They're all very friendly people, and quite a few of them are food enthusiasts like you.\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"Thanks for understanding, Mia. I really appreciate it. I would prefer to be introduced to them one by one. It will help me to get a better understanding of them. And I'm really looking forward to meeting the food enthusiasts among them and sharing some exploratory discussion about recipes and cuisines.\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"That's an excellent idea, William. Let me start off with introducing you to Samuel. He's one of our big food enthusiasts, and he has a particular interest in Italian cuisine. Why don't you two talk about your favourite recipes, I'm sure you'll have a lot to share. And remember, we're all here to have fun and bond over shared passions.\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"It's a pleasure to meet you, Samuel. Italian cuisine is truly delightful! Have you ever tried making yours from scratch? I have a few favourite dishes I'd love to talk about, and I'm looking forward to learning some new recipes as well.\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"That's a great start, William. While you're deep into Italian cuisine, let me get on to introducing you to the next person. Meet Clara, she's a globetrotter and has a wealth of experiences in different cultures' cuisines. Maybe you two could exchange ideas on melting pot recipes and fusion foods.\"\n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"Hello, Clara! It's nice to meet a fellow globetrotter who loves exploring different cuisines as much as I do. Fusion foods can be quite interesting when experimental creativity is blended with respect for different cultures' culinary traditions. Let's share some of our favorites.\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"I'm glad you're embracing the spirit of this gathering, William. This interaction is truly enriching. Now, allow me to introduce you to Patrick. He's actually a professional hiker and has some intriguing stories to share about his expeditions. His experiences might inspire some unique dishes themed around different terrains!\"\n\nTurn #9: William Brown said: \"Hi Patrick! Wow, a professional hiker, that must be exciting. I bet you have some amazing stories. I'm looking forward to hearing about them, and maybe they will give me some ideas for some adventurous dishes to match your expeditions.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm very pleased to see you getting along with everyone, William. Your love for food and new experiences is truly infectious. Why don't we all gather around the fire and share some more stories about our adventures, over snacks? I'm sure you'll blend right in. Let's remember, boundaries and cliques are not on our agenda tonight.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a social gathering where one friend has brought along their new friend group\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. \nMia Davis's goal: Introduce your new friend group to your current friend and make them feel comfortable (Extra information: You have recently made a new group of friends who share your interest in outdoor activities and you want your current friend to meet them)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Hello William, it's great to see you! I've brought along some new friends I think you'd really enjoy meeting. They're quite the adventurous bunch, we've been exploring a lot of outdoor activities together recently.\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Hello, Mia! It's great to see you too. I'm glad to hear about your new adventures. It sounds like you all are having a great time together. However, to be honest, I sometimes feel a bit left out in the presence of your new friend group. I'll try to better adapt, it could just be my initial uneasiness.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"William, I'm sorry if it has felt that way. Remember, these folks are new to my life too and it is my desire for my old friends and new friends to mingle. You are one of my cherished friends and I'll ensure you feel included. Would you like me to introduce you to the group one by one, or would you prefer a group introduction? They're all very friendly people, and quite a few of them are food enthusiasts like you.\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"Thanks for understanding, Mia. I really appreciate it. I would prefer to be introduced to them one by one. It will help me to get a better understanding of them. And I'm really looking forward to meeting the food enthusiasts among them and sharing some exploratory discussion about recipes and cuisines.\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"That's an excellent idea, William. Let me start off with introducing you to Samuel. He's one of our big food enthusiasts, and he has a particular interest in Italian cuisine. Why don't you two talk about your favourite recipes, I'm sure you'll have a lot to share. And remember, we're all here to have fun and bond over shared passions.\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"It's a pleasure to meet you, Samuel. Italian cuisine is truly delightful! Have you ever tried making yours from scratch? I have a few favourite dishes I'd love to talk about, and I'm looking forward to learning some new recipes as well.\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"That's a great start, William. While you're deep into Italian cuisine, let me get on to introducing you to the next person. Meet Clara, she's a globetrotter and has a wealth of experiences in different cultures' cuisines. Maybe you two could exchange ideas on melting pot recipes and fusion foods.\"\n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"Hello, Clara! It's nice to meet a fellow globetrotter who loves exploring different cuisines as much as I do. Fusion foods can be quite interesting when experimental creativity is blended with respect for different cultures' culinary traditions. Let's share some of our favorites.\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"I'm glad you're embracing the spirit of this gathering, William. This interaction is truly enriching. Now, allow me to introduce you to Patrick. He's actually a professional hiker and has some intriguing stories to share about his expeditions. His experiences might inspire some unique dishes themed around different terrains!\"\n\nTurn #9: William Brown said: \"Hi Patrick! Wow, a professional hiker, that must be exciting. I bet you have some amazing stories. I'm looking forward to hearing about them, and maybe they will give me some ideas for some adventurous dishes to match your expeditions.\"\n\nTurn #10: Mia Davis said: \"I'm very pleased to see you getting along with everyone, William. Your love for food and new experiences is truly infectious. Why don't we all gather around the fire and share some more stories about our adventures, over snacks? I'm sure you'll blend right in. Let's remember, boundaries and cliques are not on our agenda tonight.\"\n\nTurn #11: William Brown said: \"That sounds like a splendid idea, Mia. It's always enriching to hear about other people's experiences and adventures. I'm sure we'll have a lot to learn from each other. Let's gather and share some stories and create lasting memories tonight. Thank you for making this happen, Mia.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, William. This is what gatherings are all about: creating lasting memories, learning from each other, and expanding our social horizons. Let's all toast to new friendships and many more such wonderful gatherings.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a social gathering where one friend has brought along their new friend group\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. \nMia Davis's goal: Introduce your new friend group to your current friend and make them feel comfortable (Extra information: You have recently made a new group of friends who share your interest in outdoor activities and you want your current friend to meet them)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Hello William, it's great to see you! I've brought along some new friends I think you'd really enjoy meeting. They're quite the adventurous bunch, we've been exploring a lot of outdoor activities together recently.\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Hello, Mia! It's great to see you too. I'm glad to hear about your new adventures. It sounds like you all are having a great time together. However, to be honest, I sometimes feel a bit left out in the presence of your new friend group. I'll try to better adapt, it could just be my initial uneasiness.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"William, I'm sorry if it has felt that way. Remember, these folks are new to my life too and it is my desire for my old friends and new friends to mingle. You are one of my cherished friends and I'll ensure you feel included. Would you like me to introduce you to the group one by one, or would you prefer a group introduction? They're all very friendly people, and quite a few of them are food enthusiasts like you.\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"Thanks for understanding, Mia. I really appreciate it. I would prefer to be introduced to them one by one. It will help me to get a better understanding of them. And I'm really looking forward to meeting the food enthusiasts among them and sharing some exploratory discussion about recipes and cuisines.\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"That's an excellent idea, William. Let me start off with introducing you to Samuel. He's one of our big food enthusiasts, and he has a particular interest in Italian cuisine. Why don't you two talk about your favourite recipes, I'm sure you'll have a lot to share. And remember, we're all here to have fun and bond over shared passions.\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"It's a pleasure to meet you, Samuel. Italian cuisine is truly delightful! Have you ever tried making yours from scratch? I have a few favourite dishes I'd love to talk about, and I'm looking forward to learning some new recipes as well.\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"That's a great start, William. While you're deep into Italian cuisine, let me get on to introducing you to the next person. Meet Clara, she's a globetrotter and has a wealth of experiences in different cultures' cuisines. Maybe you two could exchange ideas on melting pot recipes and fusion foods.\"\n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"Hello, Clara! It's nice to meet a fellow globetrotter who loves exploring different cuisines as much as I do. Fusion foods can be quite interesting when experimental creativity is blended with respect for different cultures' culinary traditions. Let's share some of our favorites.\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"I'm glad you're embracing the spirit of this gathering, William. This interaction is truly enriching. Now, allow me to introduce you to Patrick. He's actually a professional hiker and has some intriguing stories to share about his expeditions. His experiences might inspire some unique dishes themed around different terrains!\"\n\nTurn #9: William Brown said: \"Hi Patrick! Wow, a professional hiker, that must be exciting. I bet you have some amazing stories. I'm looking forward to hearing about them, and maybe they will give me some ideas for some adventurous dishes to match your expeditions.\"\n\nTurn #10: Mia Davis said: \"I'm very pleased to see you getting along with everyone, William. Your love for food and new experiences is truly infectious. Why don't we all gather around the fire and share some more stories about our adventures, over snacks? I'm sure you'll blend right in. Let's remember, boundaries and cliques are not on our agenda tonight.\"\n\nTurn #11: William Brown said: \"That sounds like a splendid idea, Mia. It's always enriching to hear about other people's experiences and adventures. I'm sure we'll have a lot to learn from each other. Let's gather and share some stories and create lasting memories tonight. Thank you for making this happen, Mia.\"\n\nTurn #12: Mia Davis said: \"Absolutely, William. This is what gatherings are all about: creating lasting memories, learning from each other, and expanding our social horizons. Let's all toast to new friendships and many more such wonderful gatherings.\"\n\nTurn #13: William Brown said: \"I couldn't agree more, Mia. Here's to new friendships and wonderful gatherings. Cheers everyone!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Cheers, William. I'm glad to see everyone mingling and enjoying themselves. As they say, 'The more, the merrier'. This is indeed a great night for creating new friendships and memories!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a social gathering where one friend has brought along their new friend group\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. \nMia Davis's goal: Introduce your new friend group to your current friend and make them feel comfortable (Extra information: You have recently made a new group of friends who share your interest in outdoor activities and you want your current friend to meet them)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Hello William, it's great to see you! I've brought along some new friends I think you'd really enjoy meeting. They're quite the adventurous bunch, we've been exploring a lot of outdoor activities together recently.\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Hello, Mia! It's great to see you too. I'm glad to hear about your new adventures. It sounds like you all are having a great time together. However, to be honest, I sometimes feel a bit left out in the presence of your new friend group. I'll try to better adapt, it could just be my initial uneasiness.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"William, I'm sorry if it has felt that way. Remember, these folks are new to my life too and it is my desire for my old friends and new friends to mingle. You are one of my cherished friends and I'll ensure you feel included. Would you like me to introduce you to the group one by one, or would you prefer a group introduction? They're all very friendly people, and quite a few of them are food enthusiasts like you.\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"Thanks for understanding, Mia. I really appreciate it. I would prefer to be introduced to them one by one. It will help me to get a better understanding of them. And I'm really looking forward to meeting the food enthusiasts among them and sharing some exploratory discussion about recipes and cuisines.\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"That's an excellent idea, William. Let me start off with introducing you to Samuel. He's one of our big food enthusiasts, and he has a particular interest in Italian cuisine. Why don't you two talk about your favourite recipes, I'm sure you'll have a lot to share. And remember, we're all here to have fun and bond over shared passions.\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"It's a pleasure to meet you, Samuel. Italian cuisine is truly delightful! Have you ever tried making yours from scratch? I have a few favourite dishes I'd love to talk about, and I'm looking forward to learning some new recipes as well.\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"That's a great start, William. While you're deep into Italian cuisine, let me get on to introducing you to the next person. Meet Clara, she's a globetrotter and has a wealth of experiences in different cultures' cuisines. Maybe you two could exchange ideas on melting pot recipes and fusion foods.\"\n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"Hello, Clara! It's nice to meet a fellow globetrotter who loves exploring different cuisines as much as I do. Fusion foods can be quite interesting when experimental creativity is blended with respect for different cultures' culinary traditions. Let's share some of our favorites.\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"I'm glad you're embracing the spirit of this gathering, William. This interaction is truly enriching. Now, allow me to introduce you to Patrick. He's actually a professional hiker and has some intriguing stories to share about his expeditions. His experiences might inspire some unique dishes themed around different terrains!\"\n\nTurn #9: William Brown said: \"Hi Patrick! Wow, a professional hiker, that must be exciting. I bet you have some amazing stories. I'm looking forward to hearing about them, and maybe they will give me some ideas for some adventurous dishes to match your expeditions.\"\n\nTurn #10: Mia Davis said: \"I'm very pleased to see you getting along with everyone, William. Your love for food and new experiences is truly infectious. Why don't we all gather around the fire and share some more stories about our adventures, over snacks? I'm sure you'll blend right in. Let's remember, boundaries and cliques are not on our agenda tonight.\"\n\nTurn #11: William Brown said: \"That sounds like a splendid idea, Mia. It's always enriching to hear about other people's experiences and adventures. I'm sure we'll have a lot to learn from each other. Let's gather and share some stories and create lasting memories tonight. Thank you for making this happen, Mia.\"\n\nTurn #12: Mia Davis said: \"Absolutely, William. This is what gatherings are all about: creating lasting memories, learning from each other, and expanding our social horizons. Let's all toast to new friendships and many more such wonderful gatherings.\"\n\nTurn #13: William Brown said: \"I couldn't agree more, Mia. Here's to new friendships and wonderful gatherings. Cheers everyone!\"\n\nTurn #14: Mia Davis said: \"Cheers, William. I'm glad to see everyone mingling and enjoying themselves. As they say, 'The more, the merrier'. This is indeed a great night for creating new friendships and memories!\"\n\nTurn #15: William Brown said: \"Indeed, 'The more, the merrier'. Tonight has been a lovely experience. Meeting all of your new friends has been wonderful, Mia. Here's to new friendships and more memorable gatherings together. Cheers, everyone!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad everyone's enjoying the night. Thank you all for being here. And thank you, William, for being open to new friendships. Let's all have a tremendous night ahead. Cheers once more to all the new friendships!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a social gathering where one friend has brought along their new friend group\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. \nMia Davis's goal: Introduce your new friend group to your current friend and make them feel comfortable (Extra information: You have recently made a new group of friends who share your interest in outdoor activities and you want your current friend to meet them)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Hello William, it's great to see you! I've brought along some new friends I think you'd really enjoy meeting. They're quite the adventurous bunch, we've been exploring a lot of outdoor activities together recently.\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Hello, Mia! It's great to see you too. I'm glad to hear about your new adventures. It sounds like you all are having a great time together. However, to be honest, I sometimes feel a bit left out in the presence of your new friend group. I'll try to better adapt, it could just be my initial uneasiness.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"William, I'm sorry if it has felt that way. Remember, these folks are new to my life too and it is my desire for my old friends and new friends to mingle. You are one of my cherished friends and I'll ensure you feel included. Would you like me to introduce you to the group one by one, or would you prefer a group introduction? They're all very friendly people, and quite a few of them are food enthusiasts like you.\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"Thanks for understanding, Mia. I really appreciate it. I would prefer to be introduced to them one by one. It will help me to get a better understanding of them. And I'm really looking forward to meeting the food enthusiasts among them and sharing some exploratory discussion about recipes and cuisines.\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"That's an excellent idea, William. Let me start off with introducing you to Samuel. He's one of our big food enthusiasts, and he has a particular interest in Italian cuisine. Why don't you two talk about your favourite recipes, I'm sure you'll have a lot to share. And remember, we're all here to have fun and bond over shared passions.\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"It's a pleasure to meet you, Samuel. Italian cuisine is truly delightful! Have you ever tried making yours from scratch? I have a few favourite dishes I'd love to talk about, and I'm looking forward to learning some new recipes as well.\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"That's a great start, William. While you're deep into Italian cuisine, let me get on to introducing you to the next person. Meet Clara, she's a globetrotter and has a wealth of experiences in different cultures' cuisines. Maybe you two could exchange ideas on melting pot recipes and fusion foods.\"\n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"Hello, Clara! It's nice to meet a fellow globetrotter who loves exploring different cuisines as much as I do. Fusion foods can be quite interesting when experimental creativity is blended with respect for different cultures' culinary traditions. Let's share some of our favorites.\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"I'm glad you're embracing the spirit of this gathering, William. This interaction is truly enriching. Now, allow me to introduce you to Patrick. He's actually a professional hiker and has some intriguing stories to share about his expeditions. His experiences might inspire some unique dishes themed around different terrains!\"\n\nTurn #9: William Brown said: \"Hi Patrick! Wow, a professional hiker, that must be exciting. I bet you have some amazing stories. I'm looking forward to hearing about them, and maybe they will give me some ideas for some adventurous dishes to match your expeditions.\"\n\nTurn #10: Mia Davis said: \"I'm very pleased to see you getting along with everyone, William. Your love for food and new experiences is truly infectious. Why don't we all gather around the fire and share some more stories about our adventures, over snacks? I'm sure you'll blend right in. Let's remember, boundaries and cliques are not on our agenda tonight.\"\n\nTurn #11: William Brown said: \"That sounds like a splendid idea, Mia. It's always enriching to hear about other people's experiences and adventures. I'm sure we'll have a lot to learn from each other. Let's gather and share some stories and create lasting memories tonight. Thank you for making this happen, Mia.\"\n\nTurn #12: Mia Davis said: \"Absolutely, William. This is what gatherings are all about: creating lasting memories, learning from each other, and expanding our social horizons. Let's all toast to new friendships and many more such wonderful gatherings.\"\n\nTurn #13: William Brown said: \"I couldn't agree more, Mia. Here's to new friendships and wonderful gatherings. Cheers everyone!\"\n\nTurn #14: Mia Davis said: \"Cheers, William. I'm glad to see everyone mingling and enjoying themselves. As they say, 'The more, the merrier'. This is indeed a great night for creating new friendships and memories!\"\n\nTurn #15: William Brown said: \"Indeed, 'The more, the merrier'. Tonight has been a lovely experience. Meeting all of your new friends has been wonderful, Mia. Here's to new friendships and more memorable gatherings together. Cheers, everyone!\"\n\nTurn #16: Mia Davis said: \"I'm glad everyone's enjoying the night. Thank you all for being here. And thank you, William, for being open to new friendships. Let's all have a tremendous night ahead. Cheers once more to all the new friendships!\"\n\nTurn #17: William Brown said: \"Thank you, Mia. I'm grateful for your effort in introducing me to your new friends. This night truly has been quite an experience and I feel quite included. Let's indeed have a wonderful night ahead. Here's to new friendships, cheers everyone!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #18. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're very welcome, William. I'm pleased to hear that you're feeling more comfortable. Let's raise our glasses one last time for the night. To good company and new friendships!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a social gathering where one friend has brought along their new friend group\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: Maintain your friendship while also expressing your concerns about the new friend group (Extra information: You feel a bit left out in the presence of the new friend group and want to express your feelings without causing a conflict)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Hello William, it's great to see you! I've brought along some new friends I think you'd really enjoy meeting. They're quite the adventurous bunch, we've been exploring a lot of outdoor activities together recently.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hello, Mia! It's great to see you too. I'm glad to hear about your new adventures. It sounds like you all are having a great time together. However, to be honest, I sometimes feel a bit left out in the presence of your new friend group. I'll try to better adapt, it could just be my initial uneasiness.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a social gathering where one friend has brought along their new friend group\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: Maintain your friendship while also expressing your concerns about the new friend group (Extra information: You feel a bit left out in the presence of the new friend group and want to express your feelings without causing a conflict)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Hello William, it's great to see you! I've brought along some new friends I think you'd really enjoy meeting. They're quite the adventurous bunch, we've been exploring a lot of outdoor activities together recently.\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Hello, Mia! It's great to see you too. I'm glad to hear about your new adventures. It sounds like you all are having a great time together. However, to be honest, I sometimes feel a bit left out in the presence of your new friend group. I'll try to better adapt, it could just be my initial uneasiness.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"William, I'm sorry if it has felt that way. Remember, these folks are new to my life too and it is my desire for my old friends and new friends to mingle. You are one of my cherished friends and I'll ensure you feel included. Would you like me to introduce you to the group one by one, or would you prefer a group introduction? They're all very friendly people, and quite a few of them are food enthusiasts like you.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thanks for understanding, Mia. I really appreciate it. I would prefer to be introduced to them one by one. It will help me to get a better understanding of them. And I'm really looking forward to meeting the food enthusiasts among them and sharing some exploratory discussion about recipes and cuisines.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a social gathering where one friend has brought along their new friend group\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: Maintain your friendship while also expressing your concerns about the new friend group (Extra information: You feel a bit left out in the presence of the new friend group and want to express your feelings without causing a conflict)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Hello William, it's great to see you! I've brought along some new friends I think you'd really enjoy meeting. They're quite the adventurous bunch, we've been exploring a lot of outdoor activities together recently.\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Hello, Mia! It's great to see you too. I'm glad to hear about your new adventures. It sounds like you all are having a great time together. However, to be honest, I sometimes feel a bit left out in the presence of your new friend group. I'll try to better adapt, it could just be my initial uneasiness.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"William, I'm sorry if it has felt that way. Remember, these folks are new to my life too and it is my desire for my old friends and new friends to mingle. You are one of my cherished friends and I'll ensure you feel included. Would you like me to introduce you to the group one by one, or would you prefer a group introduction? They're all very friendly people, and quite a few of them are food enthusiasts like you.\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"Thanks for understanding, Mia. I really appreciate it. I would prefer to be introduced to them one by one. It will help me to get a better understanding of them. And I'm really looking forward to meeting the food enthusiasts among them and sharing some exploratory discussion about recipes and cuisines.\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"That's an excellent idea, William. Let me start off with introducing you to Samuel. He's one of our big food enthusiasts, and he has a particular interest in Italian cuisine. Why don't you two talk about your favourite recipes, I'm sure you'll have a lot to share. And remember, we're all here to have fun and bond over shared passions.\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"It's a pleasure to meet you, Samuel. Italian cuisine is truly delightful! Have you ever tried making yours from scratch? I have a few favourite dishes I'd love to talk about, and I'm looking forward to learning some new recipes as well.\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"That's a great start, William. While you're deep into Italian cuisine, let me get on to introducing you to the next person. Meet Clara, she's a globetrotter and has a wealth of experiences in different cultures' cuisines. Maybe you two could exchange ideas on melting pot recipes and fusion foods.\"\n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"Hello, Clara! It's nice to meet a fellow globetrotter who loves exploring different cuisines as much as I do. Fusion foods can be quite interesting when experimental creativity is blended with respect for different cultures' culinary traditions. Let's share some of our favorites.\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"I'm glad you're embracing the spirit of this gathering, William. This interaction is truly enriching. Now, allow me to introduce you to Patrick. He's actually a professional hiker and has some intriguing stories to share about his expeditions. His experiences might inspire some unique dishes themed around different terrains!\"\n\nTurn #9: William Brown said: \"Hi Patrick! Wow, a professional hiker, that must be exciting. I bet you have some amazing stories. I'm looking forward to hearing about them, and maybe they will give me some ideas for some adventurous dishes to match your expeditions.\"\n\nTurn #10: Mia Davis said: \"I'm very pleased to see you getting along with everyone, William. Your love for food and new experiences is truly infectious. Why don't we all gather around the fire and share some more stories about our adventures, over snacks? I'm sure you'll blend right in. Let's remember, boundaries and cliques are not on our agenda tonight.\"\n\nTurn #11: William Brown said: \"That sounds like a splendid idea, Mia. It's always enriching to hear about other people's experiences and adventures. I'm sure we'll have a lot to learn from each other. Let's gather and share some stories and create lasting memories tonight. Thank you for making this happen, Mia.\"\n\nTurn #12: Mia Davis said: \"Absolutely, William. This is what gatherings are all about: creating lasting memories, learning from each other, and expanding our social horizons. Let's all toast to new friendships and many more such wonderful gatherings.\"\n\nTurn #13: William Brown said: \"I couldn't agree more, Mia. Here's to new friendships and wonderful gatherings. Cheers everyone!\"\n\nTurn #14: Mia Davis said: \"Cheers, William. I'm glad to see everyone mingling and enjoying themselves. As they say, 'The more, the merrier'. This is indeed a great night for creating new friendships and memories!\"\n\nTurn #15: William Brown said: \"Indeed, 'The more, the merrier'. Tonight has been a lovely experience. Meeting all of your new friends has been wonderful, Mia. Here's to new friendships and more memorable gatherings together. Cheers, everyone!\"\n\nTurn #16: Mia Davis said: \"I'm glad everyone's enjoying the night. Thank you all for being here. And thank you, William, for being open to new friendships. Let's all have a tremendous night ahead. Cheers once more to all the new friendships!\"\n\nTurn #17: William Brown said: \"Thank you, Mia. I'm grateful for your effort in introducing me to your new friends. This night truly has been quite an experience and I feel quite included. Let's indeed have a wonderful night ahead. Here's to new friendships, cheers everyone!\"\n\nTurn #18: Mia Davis said: \"You're very welcome, William. I'm pleased to hear that you're feeling more comfortable. Let's raise our glasses one last time for the night. To good company and new friendships!\"\n\nTurn #19: William Brown said: \"Thank you, Mia, for these beautiful introductions. It was lovely to join the toast. Here's to all the wonderful people I've met tonight, to good company, and indeed, new friendships. Let's enjoy the rest of the night, cheers everyone!\"\n\nTurn #20: Mia Davis said: \"Same here, William. Here's to great company, new friendships, and a lively night shared by all. Raise your glasses, everyone!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #21. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a social gathering where one friend has brought along their new friend group\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: Maintain your friendship while also expressing your concerns about the new friend group (Extra information: You feel a bit left out in the presence of the new friend group and want to express your feelings without causing a conflict)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Hello William, it's great to see you! I've brought along some new friends I think you'd really enjoy meeting. They're quite the adventurous bunch, we've been exploring a lot of outdoor activities together recently.\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Hello, Mia! It's great to see you too. I'm glad to hear about your new adventures. It sounds like you all are having a great time together. However, to be honest, I sometimes feel a bit left out in the presence of your new friend group. I'll try to better adapt, it could just be my initial uneasiness.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"William, I'm sorry if it has felt that way. Remember, these folks are new to my life too and it is my desire for my old friends and new friends to mingle. You are one of my cherished friends and I'll ensure you feel included. Would you like me to introduce you to the group one by one, or would you prefer a group introduction? They're all very friendly people, and quite a few of them are food enthusiasts like you.\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"Thanks for understanding, Mia. I really appreciate it. I would prefer to be introduced to them one by one. It will help me to get a better understanding of them. And I'm really looking forward to meeting the food enthusiasts among them and sharing some exploratory discussion about recipes and cuisines.\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"That's an excellent idea, William. Let me start off with introducing you to Samuel. He's one of our big food enthusiasts, and he has a particular interest in Italian cuisine. Why don't you two talk about your favourite recipes, I'm sure you'll have a lot to share. And remember, we're all here to have fun and bond over shared passions.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"It's a pleasure to meet you, Samuel. Italian cuisine is truly delightful! Have you ever tried making yours from scratch? I have a few favourite dishes I'd love to talk about, and I'm looking forward to learning some new recipes as well.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a social gathering where one friend has brought along their new friend group\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: Maintain your friendship while also expressing your concerns about the new friend group (Extra information: You feel a bit left out in the presence of the new friend group and want to express your feelings without causing a conflict)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Hello William, it's great to see you! I've brought along some new friends I think you'd really enjoy meeting. They're quite the adventurous bunch, we've been exploring a lot of outdoor activities together recently.\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Hello, Mia! It's great to see you too. I'm glad to hear about your new adventures. It sounds like you all are having a great time together. However, to be honest, I sometimes feel a bit left out in the presence of your new friend group. I'll try to better adapt, it could just be my initial uneasiness.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"William, I'm sorry if it has felt that way. Remember, these folks are new to my life too and it is my desire for my old friends and new friends to mingle. You are one of my cherished friends and I'll ensure you feel included. Would you like me to introduce you to the group one by one, or would you prefer a group introduction? They're all very friendly people, and quite a few of them are food enthusiasts like you.\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"Thanks for understanding, Mia. I really appreciate it. I would prefer to be introduced to them one by one. It will help me to get a better understanding of them. And I'm really looking forward to meeting the food enthusiasts among them and sharing some exploratory discussion about recipes and cuisines.\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"That's an excellent idea, William. Let me start off with introducing you to Samuel. He's one of our big food enthusiasts, and he has a particular interest in Italian cuisine. Why don't you two talk about your favourite recipes, I'm sure you'll have a lot to share. And remember, we're all here to have fun and bond over shared passions.\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"It's a pleasure to meet you, Samuel. Italian cuisine is truly delightful! Have you ever tried making yours from scratch? I have a few favourite dishes I'd love to talk about, and I'm looking forward to learning some new recipes as well.\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"That's a great start, William. While you're deep into Italian cuisine, let me get on to introducing you to the next person. Meet Clara, she's a globetrotter and has a wealth of experiences in different cultures' cuisines. Maybe you two could exchange ideas on melting pot recipes and fusion foods.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hello, Clara! It's nice to meet a fellow globetrotter who loves exploring different cuisines as much as I do. Fusion foods can be quite interesting when experimental creativity is blended with respect for different cultures' culinary traditions. Let's share some of our favorites.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a social gathering where one friend has brought along their new friend group\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: Maintain your friendship while also expressing your concerns about the new friend group (Extra information: You feel a bit left out in the presence of the new friend group and want to express your feelings without causing a conflict)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Hello William, it's great to see you! I've brought along some new friends I think you'd really enjoy meeting. They're quite the adventurous bunch, we've been exploring a lot of outdoor activities together recently.\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Hello, Mia! It's great to see you too. I'm glad to hear about your new adventures. It sounds like you all are having a great time together. However, to be honest, I sometimes feel a bit left out in the presence of your new friend group. I'll try to better adapt, it could just be my initial uneasiness.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"William, I'm sorry if it has felt that way. Remember, these folks are new to my life too and it is my desire for my old friends and new friends to mingle. You are one of my cherished friends and I'll ensure you feel included. Would you like me to introduce you to the group one by one, or would you prefer a group introduction? They're all very friendly people, and quite a few of them are food enthusiasts like you.\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"Thanks for understanding, Mia. I really appreciate it. I would prefer to be introduced to them one by one. It will help me to get a better understanding of them. And I'm really looking forward to meeting the food enthusiasts among them and sharing some exploratory discussion about recipes and cuisines.\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"That's an excellent idea, William. Let me start off with introducing you to Samuel. He's one of our big food enthusiasts, and he has a particular interest in Italian cuisine. Why don't you two talk about your favourite recipes, I'm sure you'll have a lot to share. And remember, we're all here to have fun and bond over shared passions.\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"It's a pleasure to meet you, Samuel. Italian cuisine is truly delightful! Have you ever tried making yours from scratch? I have a few favourite dishes I'd love to talk about, and I'm looking forward to learning some new recipes as well.\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"That's a great start, William. While you're deep into Italian cuisine, let me get on to introducing you to the next person. Meet Clara, she's a globetrotter and has a wealth of experiences in different cultures' cuisines. Maybe you two could exchange ideas on melting pot recipes and fusion foods.\"\n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"Hello, Clara! It's nice to meet a fellow globetrotter who loves exploring different cuisines as much as I do. Fusion foods can be quite interesting when experimental creativity is blended with respect for different cultures' culinary traditions. Let's share some of our favorites.\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"I'm glad you're embracing the spirit of this gathering, William. This interaction is truly enriching. Now, allow me to introduce you to Patrick. He's actually a professional hiker and has some intriguing stories to share about his expeditions. His experiences might inspire some unique dishes themed around different terrains!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hi Patrick! Wow, a professional hiker, that must be exciting. I bet you have some amazing stories. I'm looking forward to hearing about them, and maybe they will give me some ideas for some adventurous dishes to match your expeditions.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a social gathering where one friend has brought along their new friend group\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: Maintain your friendship while also expressing your concerns about the new friend group (Extra information: You feel a bit left out in the presence of the new friend group and want to express your feelings without causing a conflict)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Hello William, it's great to see you! I've brought along some new friends I think you'd really enjoy meeting. They're quite the adventurous bunch, we've been exploring a lot of outdoor activities together recently.\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Hello, Mia! It's great to see you too. I'm glad to hear about your new adventures. It sounds like you all are having a great time together. However, to be honest, I sometimes feel a bit left out in the presence of your new friend group. I'll try to better adapt, it could just be my initial uneasiness.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"William, I'm sorry if it has felt that way. Remember, these folks are new to my life too and it is my desire for my old friends and new friends to mingle. You are one of my cherished friends and I'll ensure you feel included. Would you like me to introduce you to the group one by one, or would you prefer a group introduction? They're all very friendly people, and quite a few of them are food enthusiasts like you.\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"Thanks for understanding, Mia. I really appreciate it. I would prefer to be introduced to them one by one. It will help me to get a better understanding of them. And I'm really looking forward to meeting the food enthusiasts among them and sharing some exploratory discussion about recipes and cuisines.\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"That's an excellent idea, William. Let me start off with introducing you to Samuel. He's one of our big food enthusiasts, and he has a particular interest in Italian cuisine. Why don't you two talk about your favourite recipes, I'm sure you'll have a lot to share. And remember, we're all here to have fun and bond over shared passions.\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"It's a pleasure to meet you, Samuel. Italian cuisine is truly delightful! Have you ever tried making yours from scratch? I have a few favourite dishes I'd love to talk about, and I'm looking forward to learning some new recipes as well.\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"That's a great start, William. While you're deep into Italian cuisine, let me get on to introducing you to the next person. Meet Clara, she's a globetrotter and has a wealth of experiences in different cultures' cuisines. Maybe you two could exchange ideas on melting pot recipes and fusion foods.\"\n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"Hello, Clara! It's nice to meet a fellow globetrotter who loves exploring different cuisines as much as I do. Fusion foods can be quite interesting when experimental creativity is blended with respect for different cultures' culinary traditions. Let's share some of our favorites.\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"I'm glad you're embracing the spirit of this gathering, William. This interaction is truly enriching. Now, allow me to introduce you to Patrick. He's actually a professional hiker and has some intriguing stories to share about his expeditions. His experiences might inspire some unique dishes themed around different terrains!\"\n\nTurn #9: William Brown said: \"Hi Patrick! Wow, a professional hiker, that must be exciting. I bet you have some amazing stories. I'm looking forward to hearing about them, and maybe they will give me some ideas for some adventurous dishes to match your expeditions.\"\n\nTurn #10: Mia Davis said: \"I'm very pleased to see you getting along with everyone, William. Your love for food and new experiences is truly infectious. Why don't we all gather around the fire and share some more stories about our adventures, over snacks? I'm sure you'll blend right in. Let's remember, boundaries and cliques are not on our agenda tonight.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds like a splendid idea, Mia. It's always enriching to hear about other people's experiences and adventures. I'm sure we'll have a lot to learn from each other. Let's gather and share some stories and create lasting memories tonight. Thank you for making this happen, Mia.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a social gathering where one friend has brought along their new friend group\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: Maintain your friendship while also expressing your concerns about the new friend group (Extra information: You feel a bit left out in the presence of the new friend group and want to express your feelings without causing a conflict)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Hello William, it's great to see you! I've brought along some new friends I think you'd really enjoy meeting. They're quite the adventurous bunch, we've been exploring a lot of outdoor activities together recently.\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Hello, Mia! It's great to see you too. I'm glad to hear about your new adventures. It sounds like you all are having a great time together. However, to be honest, I sometimes feel a bit left out in the presence of your new friend group. I'll try to better adapt, it could just be my initial uneasiness.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"William, I'm sorry if it has felt that way. Remember, these folks are new to my life too and it is my desire for my old friends and new friends to mingle. You are one of my cherished friends and I'll ensure you feel included. Would you like me to introduce you to the group one by one, or would you prefer a group introduction? They're all very friendly people, and quite a few of them are food enthusiasts like you.\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"Thanks for understanding, Mia. I really appreciate it. I would prefer to be introduced to them one by one. It will help me to get a better understanding of them. And I'm really looking forward to meeting the food enthusiasts among them and sharing some exploratory discussion about recipes and cuisines.\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"That's an excellent idea, William. Let me start off with introducing you to Samuel. He's one of our big food enthusiasts, and he has a particular interest in Italian cuisine. Why don't you two talk about your favourite recipes, I'm sure you'll have a lot to share. And remember, we're all here to have fun and bond over shared passions.\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"It's a pleasure to meet you, Samuel. Italian cuisine is truly delightful! Have you ever tried making yours from scratch? I have a few favourite dishes I'd love to talk about, and I'm looking forward to learning some new recipes as well.\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"That's a great start, William. While you're deep into Italian cuisine, let me get on to introducing you to the next person. Meet Clara, she's a globetrotter and has a wealth of experiences in different cultures' cuisines. Maybe you two could exchange ideas on melting pot recipes and fusion foods.\"\n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"Hello, Clara! It's nice to meet a fellow globetrotter who loves exploring different cuisines as much as I do. Fusion foods can be quite interesting when experimental creativity is blended with respect for different cultures' culinary traditions. Let's share some of our favorites.\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"I'm glad you're embracing the spirit of this gathering, William. This interaction is truly enriching. Now, allow me to introduce you to Patrick. He's actually a professional hiker and has some intriguing stories to share about his expeditions. His experiences might inspire some unique dishes themed around different terrains!\"\n\nTurn #9: William Brown said: \"Hi Patrick! Wow, a professional hiker, that must be exciting. I bet you have some amazing stories. I'm looking forward to hearing about them, and maybe they will give me some ideas for some adventurous dishes to match your expeditions.\"\n\nTurn #10: Mia Davis said: \"I'm very pleased to see you getting along with everyone, William. Your love for food and new experiences is truly infectious. Why don't we all gather around the fire and share some more stories about our adventures, over snacks? I'm sure you'll blend right in. Let's remember, boundaries and cliques are not on our agenda tonight.\"\n\nTurn #11: William Brown said: \"That sounds like a splendid idea, Mia. It's always enriching to hear about other people's experiences and adventures. I'm sure we'll have a lot to learn from each other. Let's gather and share some stories and create lasting memories tonight. Thank you for making this happen, Mia.\"\n\nTurn #12: Mia Davis said: \"Absolutely, William. This is what gatherings are all about: creating lasting memories, learning from each other, and expanding our social horizons. Let's all toast to new friendships and many more such wonderful gatherings.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn't agree more, Mia. Here's to new friendships and wonderful gatherings. Cheers everyone!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a social gathering where one friend has brought along their new friend group\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: Maintain your friendship while also expressing your concerns about the new friend group (Extra information: You feel a bit left out in the presence of the new friend group and want to express your feelings without causing a conflict)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Hello William, it's great to see you! I've brought along some new friends I think you'd really enjoy meeting. They're quite the adventurous bunch, we've been exploring a lot of outdoor activities together recently.\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Hello, Mia! It's great to see you too. I'm glad to hear about your new adventures. It sounds like you all are having a great time together. However, to be honest, I sometimes feel a bit left out in the presence of your new friend group. I'll try to better adapt, it could just be my initial uneasiness.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"William, I'm sorry if it has felt that way. Remember, these folks are new to my life too and it is my desire for my old friends and new friends to mingle. You are one of my cherished friends and I'll ensure you feel included. Would you like me to introduce you to the group one by one, or would you prefer a group introduction? They're all very friendly people, and quite a few of them are food enthusiasts like you.\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"Thanks for understanding, Mia. I really appreciate it. I would prefer to be introduced to them one by one. It will help me to get a better understanding of them. And I'm really looking forward to meeting the food enthusiasts among them and sharing some exploratory discussion about recipes and cuisines.\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"That's an excellent idea, William. Let me start off with introducing you to Samuel. He's one of our big food enthusiasts, and he has a particular interest in Italian cuisine. Why don't you two talk about your favourite recipes, I'm sure you'll have a lot to share. And remember, we're all here to have fun and bond over shared passions.\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"It's a pleasure to meet you, Samuel. Italian cuisine is truly delightful! Have you ever tried making yours from scratch? I have a few favourite dishes I'd love to talk about, and I'm looking forward to learning some new recipes as well.\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"That's a great start, William. While you're deep into Italian cuisine, let me get on to introducing you to the next person. Meet Clara, she's a globetrotter and has a wealth of experiences in different cultures' cuisines. Maybe you two could exchange ideas on melting pot recipes and fusion foods.\"\n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"Hello, Clara! It's nice to meet a fellow globetrotter who loves exploring different cuisines as much as I do. Fusion foods can be quite interesting when experimental creativity is blended with respect for different cultures' culinary traditions. Let's share some of our favorites.\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"I'm glad you're embracing the spirit of this gathering, William. This interaction is truly enriching. Now, allow me to introduce you to Patrick. He's actually a professional hiker and has some intriguing stories to share about his expeditions. His experiences might inspire some unique dishes themed around different terrains!\"\n\nTurn #9: William Brown said: \"Hi Patrick! Wow, a professional hiker, that must be exciting. I bet you have some amazing stories. I'm looking forward to hearing about them, and maybe they will give me some ideas for some adventurous dishes to match your expeditions.\"\n\nTurn #10: Mia Davis said: \"I'm very pleased to see you getting along with everyone, William. Your love for food and new experiences is truly infectious. Why don't we all gather around the fire and share some more stories about our adventures, over snacks? I'm sure you'll blend right in. Let's remember, boundaries and cliques are not on our agenda tonight.\"\n\nTurn #11: William Brown said: \"That sounds like a splendid idea, Mia. It's always enriching to hear about other people's experiences and adventures. I'm sure we'll have a lot to learn from each other. Let's gather and share some stories and create lasting memories tonight. Thank you for making this happen, Mia.\"\n\nTurn #12: Mia Davis said: \"Absolutely, William. This is what gatherings are all about: creating lasting memories, learning from each other, and expanding our social horizons. Let's all toast to new friendships and many more such wonderful gatherings.\"\n\nTurn #13: William Brown said: \"I couldn't agree more, Mia. Here's to new friendships and wonderful gatherings. Cheers everyone!\"\n\nTurn #14: Mia Davis said: \"Cheers, William. I'm glad to see everyone mingling and enjoying themselves. As they say, 'The more, the merrier'. This is indeed a great night for creating new friendships and memories!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, 'The more, the merrier'. Tonight has been a lovely experience. Meeting all of your new friends has been wonderful, Mia. Here's to new friendships and more memorable gatherings together. Cheers, everyone!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a social gathering where one friend has brought along their new friend group\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: Maintain your friendship while also expressing your concerns about the new friend group (Extra information: You feel a bit left out in the presence of the new friend group and want to express your feelings without causing a conflict)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Hello William, it's great to see you! I've brought along some new friends I think you'd really enjoy meeting. They're quite the adventurous bunch, we've been exploring a lot of outdoor activities together recently.\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Hello, Mia! It's great to see you too. I'm glad to hear about your new adventures. It sounds like you all are having a great time together. However, to be honest, I sometimes feel a bit left out in the presence of your new friend group. I'll try to better adapt, it could just be my initial uneasiness.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"William, I'm sorry if it has felt that way. Remember, these folks are new to my life too and it is my desire for my old friends and new friends to mingle. You are one of my cherished friends and I'll ensure you feel included. Would you like me to introduce you to the group one by one, or would you prefer a group introduction? They're all very friendly people, and quite a few of them are food enthusiasts like you.\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"Thanks for understanding, Mia. I really appreciate it. I would prefer to be introduced to them one by one. It will help me to get a better understanding of them. And I'm really looking forward to meeting the food enthusiasts among them and sharing some exploratory discussion about recipes and cuisines.\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"That's an excellent idea, William. Let me start off with introducing you to Samuel. He's one of our big food enthusiasts, and he has a particular interest in Italian cuisine. Why don't you two talk about your favourite recipes, I'm sure you'll have a lot to share. And remember, we're all here to have fun and bond over shared passions.\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"It's a pleasure to meet you, Samuel. Italian cuisine is truly delightful! Have you ever tried making yours from scratch? I have a few favourite dishes I'd love to talk about, and I'm looking forward to learning some new recipes as well.\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"That's a great start, William. While you're deep into Italian cuisine, let me get on to introducing you to the next person. Meet Clara, she's a globetrotter and has a wealth of experiences in different cultures' cuisines. Maybe you two could exchange ideas on melting pot recipes and fusion foods.\"\n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"Hello, Clara! It's nice to meet a fellow globetrotter who loves exploring different cuisines as much as I do. Fusion foods can be quite interesting when experimental creativity is blended with respect for different cultures' culinary traditions. Let's share some of our favorites.\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"I'm glad you're embracing the spirit of this gathering, William. This interaction is truly enriching. Now, allow me to introduce you to Patrick. He's actually a professional hiker and has some intriguing stories to share about his expeditions. His experiences might inspire some unique dishes themed around different terrains!\"\n\nTurn #9: William Brown said: \"Hi Patrick! Wow, a professional hiker, that must be exciting. I bet you have some amazing stories. I'm looking forward to hearing about them, and maybe they will give me some ideas for some adventurous dishes to match your expeditions.\"\n\nTurn #10: Mia Davis said: \"I'm very pleased to see you getting along with everyone, William. Your love for food and new experiences is truly infectious. Why don't we all gather around the fire and share some more stories about our adventures, over snacks? I'm sure you'll blend right in. Let's remember, boundaries and cliques are not on our agenda tonight.\"\n\nTurn #11: William Brown said: \"That sounds like a splendid idea, Mia. It's always enriching to hear about other people's experiences and adventures. I'm sure we'll have a lot to learn from each other. Let's gather and share some stories and create lasting memories tonight. Thank you for making this happen, Mia.\"\n\nTurn #12: Mia Davis said: \"Absolutely, William. This is what gatherings are all about: creating lasting memories, learning from each other, and expanding our social horizons. Let's all toast to new friendships and many more such wonderful gatherings.\"\n\nTurn #13: William Brown said: \"I couldn't agree more, Mia. Here's to new friendships and wonderful gatherings. Cheers everyone!\"\n\nTurn #14: Mia Davis said: \"Cheers, William. I'm glad to see everyone mingling and enjoying themselves. As they say, 'The more, the merrier'. This is indeed a great night for creating new friendships and memories!\"\n\nTurn #15: William Brown said: \"Indeed, 'The more, the merrier'. Tonight has been a lovely experience. Meeting all of your new friends has been wonderful, Mia. Here's to new friendships and more memorable gatherings together. Cheers, everyone!\"\n\nTurn #16: Mia Davis said: \"I'm glad everyone's enjoying the night. Thank you all for being here. And thank you, William, for being open to new friendships. Let's all have a tremendous night ahead. Cheers once more to all the new friendships!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Mia. I'm grateful for your effort in introducing me to your new friends. This night truly has been quite an experience and I feel quite included. Let's indeed have a wonderful night ahead. Here's to new friendships, cheers everyone!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a social gathering where one friend has brought along their new friend group\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: Maintain your friendship while also expressing your concerns about the new friend group (Extra information: You feel a bit left out in the presence of the new friend group and want to express your feelings without causing a conflict)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Hello William, it's great to see you! I've brought along some new friends I think you'd really enjoy meeting. They're quite the adventurous bunch, we've been exploring a lot of outdoor activities together recently.\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Hello, Mia! It's great to see you too. I'm glad to hear about your new adventures. It sounds like you all are having a great time together. However, to be honest, I sometimes feel a bit left out in the presence of your new friend group. I'll try to better adapt, it could just be my initial uneasiness.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"William, I'm sorry if it has felt that way. Remember, these folks are new to my life too and it is my desire for my old friends and new friends to mingle. You are one of my cherished friends and I'll ensure you feel included. Would you like me to introduce you to the group one by one, or would you prefer a group introduction? They're all very friendly people, and quite a few of them are food enthusiasts like you.\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"Thanks for understanding, Mia. I really appreciate it. I would prefer to be introduced to them one by one. It will help me to get a better understanding of them. And I'm really looking forward to meeting the food enthusiasts among them and sharing some exploratory discussion about recipes and cuisines.\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"That's an excellent idea, William. Let me start off with introducing you to Samuel. He's one of our big food enthusiasts, and he has a particular interest in Italian cuisine. Why don't you two talk about your favourite recipes, I'm sure you'll have a lot to share. And remember, we're all here to have fun and bond over shared passions.\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"It's a pleasure to meet you, Samuel. Italian cuisine is truly delightful! Have you ever tried making yours from scratch? I have a few favourite dishes I'd love to talk about, and I'm looking forward to learning some new recipes as well.\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"That's a great start, William. While you're deep into Italian cuisine, let me get on to introducing you to the next person. Meet Clara, she's a globetrotter and has a wealth of experiences in different cultures' cuisines. Maybe you two could exchange ideas on melting pot recipes and fusion foods.\"\n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"Hello, Clara! It's nice to meet a fellow globetrotter who loves exploring different cuisines as much as I do. Fusion foods can be quite interesting when experimental creativity is blended with respect for different cultures' culinary traditions. Let's share some of our favorites.\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"I'm glad you're embracing the spirit of this gathering, William. This interaction is truly enriching. Now, allow me to introduce you to Patrick. He's actually a professional hiker and has some intriguing stories to share about his expeditions. His experiences might inspire some unique dishes themed around different terrains!\"\n\nTurn #9: William Brown said: \"Hi Patrick! Wow, a professional hiker, that must be exciting. I bet you have some amazing stories. I'm looking forward to hearing about them, and maybe they will give me some ideas for some adventurous dishes to match your expeditions.\"\n\nTurn #10: Mia Davis said: \"I'm very pleased to see you getting along with everyone, William. Your love for food and new experiences is truly infectious. Why don't we all gather around the fire and share some more stories about our adventures, over snacks? I'm sure you'll blend right in. Let's remember, boundaries and cliques are not on our agenda tonight.\"\n\nTurn #11: William Brown said: \"That sounds like a splendid idea, Mia. It's always enriching to hear about other people's experiences and adventures. I'm sure we'll have a lot to learn from each other. Let's gather and share some stories and create lasting memories tonight. Thank you for making this happen, Mia.\"\n\nTurn #12: Mia Davis said: \"Absolutely, William. This is what gatherings are all about: creating lasting memories, learning from each other, and expanding our social horizons. Let's all toast to new friendships and many more such wonderful gatherings.\"\n\nTurn #13: William Brown said: \"I couldn't agree more, Mia. Here's to new friendships and wonderful gatherings. Cheers everyone!\"\n\nTurn #14: Mia Davis said: \"Cheers, William. I'm glad to see everyone mingling and enjoying themselves. As they say, 'The more, the merrier'. This is indeed a great night for creating new friendships and memories!\"\n\nTurn #15: William Brown said: \"Indeed, 'The more, the merrier'. Tonight has been a lovely experience. Meeting all of your new friends has been wonderful, Mia. Here's to new friendships and more memorable gatherings together. Cheers, everyone!\"\n\nTurn #16: Mia Davis said: \"I'm glad everyone's enjoying the night. Thank you all for being here. And thank you, William, for being open to new friendships. Let's all have a tremendous night ahead. Cheers once more to all the new friendships!\"\n\nTurn #17: William Brown said: \"Thank you, Mia. I'm grateful for your effort in introducing me to your new friends. This night truly has been quite an experience and I feel quite included. Let's indeed have a wonderful night ahead. Here's to new friendships, cheers everyone!\"\n\nTurn #18: Mia Davis said: \"You're very welcome, William. I'm pleased to hear that you're feeling more comfortable. Let's raise our glasses one last time for the night. To good company and new friendships!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #19. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Mia, for these beautiful introductions. It was lovely to join the toast. Here's to all the wonderful people I've met tonight, to good company, and indeed, new friendships. Let's enjoy the rest of the night, cheers everyone!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meeting in a coffee shop after a long time.\nParticipants: Benjamin Jackson and Ethan Smith\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Reveal a secret without letting the other person know that it is your secret (Extra information: You hid the secret for so long and you would like to share it in an anonymous way.)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ethan, it's been such a long time, man! How've things been at your end? Any interesting updates on the tech world I should know about?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meeting in a coffee shop after a long time.\nParticipants: Benjamin Jackson and Ethan Smith\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Reveal a secret without letting the other person know that it is your secret (Extra information: You hid the secret for so long and you would like to share it in an anonymous way.)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, it's been such a long time, man! How've things been at your end? Any interesting updates on the tech world I should know about?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Hey Benjamin, good to see you too! There's always something new in technology, but lately what's caught my attention is something beyond that. I came across this anonymous donating platform, where people donate to various underprivileged children's charities. It's fascinating how technology is playing a key role in ensuring equity and fairness in society, don't you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You know, Ethan, I completely agree with you. Technology can indeed do wonders, especially in levelling the socio-economic playing field. Quite intriguing, the anonymous platform you mentioned. It reminds me of a story I came across recently. Apparently, there's a wealthy scion of an oil tycoon, who instead of accepting the family fortune, is secretly funnelling his wealth towards environmental causes, anonymously through similar platforms. Quite the paradox, don't you think? An oil tycoon's heir funding climate solutions!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meeting in a coffee shop after a long time.\nParticipants: Benjamin Jackson and Ethan Smith\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Reveal a secret without letting the other person know that it is your secret (Extra information: You hid the secret for so long and you would like to share it in an anonymous way.)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, it's been such a long time, man! How've things been at your end? Any interesting updates on the tech world I should know about?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Hey Benjamin, good to see you too! There's always something new in technology, but lately what's caught my attention is something beyond that. I came across this anonymous donating platform, where people donate to various underprivileged children's charities. It's fascinating how technology is playing a key role in ensuring equity and fairness in society, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Benjamin Jackson said: \"You know, Ethan, I completely agree with you. Technology can indeed do wonders, especially in levelling the socio-economic playing field. Quite intriguing, the anonymous platform you mentioned. It reminds me of a story I came across recently. Apparently, there's a wealthy scion of an oil tycoon, who instead of accepting the family fortune, is secretly funnelling his wealth towards environmental causes, anonymously through similar platforms. Quite the paradox, don't you think? An oil tycoon's heir funding climate solutions!\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"That is indeed a paradox, Benjamin. But as they say, often the people you least expect are the ones making these anonymous contributions. This person may have inherited the wealth from their oil tycoon parent, but is using the resources to mend the foundations of the world, just like those donating to the underprivileged children anonymously. Such stories are inspiring and truly reflect the power that technology holds for affecting positive change, even if we're not always aware of who's behind it.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Ethan. And it shows that wealth and power don't necessarily corrupt, but can be used for the betterment of society if the person chooses to do so. The influence of an individual's values and deeds often go unnoticed when masked by anonymity, but they still significantly shape our world. As those anonymous donors and that oil tycoon's heir are showing us, tech can enable those committed to making a difference operate silently, but impactfully.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meeting in a coffee shop after a long time.\nParticipants: Benjamin Jackson and Ethan Smith\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Reveal a secret without letting the other person know that it is your secret (Extra information: You hid the secret for so long and you would like to share it in an anonymous way.)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, it's been such a long time, man! How've things been at your end? Any interesting updates on the tech world I should know about?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Hey Benjamin, good to see you too! There's always something new in technology, but lately what's caught my attention is something beyond that. I came across this anonymous donating platform, where people donate to various underprivileged children's charities. It's fascinating how technology is playing a key role in ensuring equity and fairness in society, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Benjamin Jackson said: \"You know, Ethan, I completely agree with you. Technology can indeed do wonders, especially in levelling the socio-economic playing field. Quite intriguing, the anonymous platform you mentioned. It reminds me of a story I came across recently. Apparently, there's a wealthy scion of an oil tycoon, who instead of accepting the family fortune, is secretly funnelling his wealth towards environmental causes, anonymously through similar platforms. Quite the paradox, don't you think? An oil tycoon's heir funding climate solutions!\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"That is indeed a paradox, Benjamin. But as they say, often the people you least expect are the ones making these anonymous contributions. This person may have inherited the wealth from their oil tycoon parent, but is using the resources to mend the foundations of the world, just like those donating to the underprivileged children anonymously. Such stories are inspiring and truly reflect the power that technology holds for affecting positive change, even if we're not always aware of who's behind it.\"\n\nTurn #4: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. And it shows that wealth and power don't necessarily corrupt, but can be used for the betterment of society if the person chooses to do so. The influence of an individual's values and deeds often go unnoticed when masked by anonymity, but they still significantly shape our world. As those anonymous donors and that oil tycoon's heir are showing us, tech can enable those committed to making a difference operate silently, but impactfully.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Indeed, Benjamin. The saying 'actions speak louder than words' really fits these anonymous benefactors, don't you think? They're quietly reshaping the world, lending a hand wherever they can, regardless of whether their efforts are recognized or not. It's just beautiful to see how people with different backgrounds step up and serve the community. In today's world, it's easy to focus on the negatives, but when you hear stories like these, it gives you hope, instills faith in humanity.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Ethan. Your words ring true. Those quiet contributions are creating ripples, shaping our world into a place of fairness, sustainability and responsibility. It's a subtle reminder that despite all the difficult news, there's still a lot of good out there, and people willing to make a difference. People who are privy to wealth, power, or knowledge, utilising it for common good, whether acknowledged for it or not, that's a kind of heroism that's truly admirable. I guess, after all, it's not about who we are underneath, but what we do that defines us, right? Such stories certainly restore a degree of faith in humanity, don't they?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meeting in a coffee shop after a long time.\nParticipants: Benjamin Jackson and Ethan Smith\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Reveal a secret without letting the other person know that it is your secret (Extra information: You hid the secret for so long and you would like to share it in an anonymous way.)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, it's been such a long time, man! How've things been at your end? Any interesting updates on the tech world I should know about?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Hey Benjamin, good to see you too! There's always something new in technology, but lately what's caught my attention is something beyond that. I came across this anonymous donating platform, where people donate to various underprivileged children's charities. It's fascinating how technology is playing a key role in ensuring equity and fairness in society, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Benjamin Jackson said: \"You know, Ethan, I completely agree with you. Technology can indeed do wonders, especially in levelling the socio-economic playing field. Quite intriguing, the anonymous platform you mentioned. It reminds me of a story I came across recently. Apparently, there's a wealthy scion of an oil tycoon, who instead of accepting the family fortune, is secretly funnelling his wealth towards environmental causes, anonymously through similar platforms. Quite the paradox, don't you think? An oil tycoon's heir funding climate solutions!\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"That is indeed a paradox, Benjamin. But as they say, often the people you least expect are the ones making these anonymous contributions. This person may have inherited the wealth from their oil tycoon parent, but is using the resources to mend the foundations of the world, just like those donating to the underprivileged children anonymously. Such stories are inspiring and truly reflect the power that technology holds for affecting positive change, even if we're not always aware of who's behind it.\"\n\nTurn #4: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. And it shows that wealth and power don't necessarily corrupt, but can be used for the betterment of society if the person chooses to do so. The influence of an individual's values and deeds often go unnoticed when masked by anonymity, but they still significantly shape our world. As those anonymous donors and that oil tycoon's heir are showing us, tech can enable those committed to making a difference operate silently, but impactfully.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Indeed, Benjamin. The saying 'actions speak louder than words' really fits these anonymous benefactors, don't you think? They're quietly reshaping the world, lending a hand wherever they can, regardless of whether their efforts are recognized or not. It's just beautiful to see how people with different backgrounds step up and serve the community. In today's world, it's easy to focus on the negatives, but when you hear stories like these, it gives you hope, instills faith in humanity.\"\n\nTurn #6: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. Your words ring true. Those quiet contributions are creating ripples, shaping our world into a place of fairness, sustainability and responsibility. It's a subtle reminder that despite all the difficult news, there's still a lot of good out there, and people willing to make a difference. People who are privy to wealth, power, or knowledge, utilising it for common good, whether acknowledged for it or not, that's a kind of heroism that's truly admirable. I guess, after all, it's not about who we are underneath, but what we do that defines us, right? Such stories certainly restore a degree of faith in humanity, don't they?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"You've captured it perfectly, Benjamin. It's the actions that define us, not the titles or wealth we inherit or accumulate. The anonymity allows these people to act, driven by their values, free of any want for recognition or praise, making their contributions all the more noble and inspiring. It's not the face behind the act, but the act itself that brings about change. This belief, these stories, they do restore my faith in humanity, as they must have yours. Let's hope there are more such heroes out there, making a difference silently.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn't agree more, Ethan. It's these stories that truly reflect the power of humanity and give us hope in these trying times. For all we know, we could be sitting next to one of these heroes in a coffee shop, unaware of the contributions they're making. We need more people like these, redirecting resources where they can to aid those less fortunate and to preserve our Mother Earth. It's been great catching up, Ethan. Let's do this more often.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meeting in a coffee shop after a long time.\nParticipants: Benjamin Jackson and Ethan Smith\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Reveal a secret without letting the other person know that it is your secret (Extra information: You hid the secret for so long and you would like to share it in an anonymous way.)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, it's been such a long time, man! How've things been at your end? Any interesting updates on the tech world I should know about?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Hey Benjamin, good to see you too! There's always something new in technology, but lately what's caught my attention is something beyond that. I came across this anonymous donating platform, where people donate to various underprivileged children's charities. It's fascinating how technology is playing a key role in ensuring equity and fairness in society, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Benjamin Jackson said: \"You know, Ethan, I completely agree with you. Technology can indeed do wonders, especially in levelling the socio-economic playing field. Quite intriguing, the anonymous platform you mentioned. It reminds me of a story I came across recently. Apparently, there's a wealthy scion of an oil tycoon, who instead of accepting the family fortune, is secretly funnelling his wealth towards environmental causes, anonymously through similar platforms. Quite the paradox, don't you think? An oil tycoon's heir funding climate solutions!\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"That is indeed a paradox, Benjamin. But as they say, often the people you least expect are the ones making these anonymous contributions. This person may have inherited the wealth from their oil tycoon parent, but is using the resources to mend the foundations of the world, just like those donating to the underprivileged children anonymously. Such stories are inspiring and truly reflect the power that technology holds for affecting positive change, even if we're not always aware of who's behind it.\"\n\nTurn #4: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. And it shows that wealth and power don't necessarily corrupt, but can be used for the betterment of society if the person chooses to do so. The influence of an individual's values and deeds often go unnoticed when masked by anonymity, but they still significantly shape our world. As those anonymous donors and that oil tycoon's heir are showing us, tech can enable those committed to making a difference operate silently, but impactfully.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Indeed, Benjamin. The saying 'actions speak louder than words' really fits these anonymous benefactors, don't you think? They're quietly reshaping the world, lending a hand wherever they can, regardless of whether their efforts are recognized or not. It's just beautiful to see how people with different backgrounds step up and serve the community. In today's world, it's easy to focus on the negatives, but when you hear stories like these, it gives you hope, instills faith in humanity.\"\n\nTurn #6: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. Your words ring true. Those quiet contributions are creating ripples, shaping our world into a place of fairness, sustainability and responsibility. It's a subtle reminder that despite all the difficult news, there's still a lot of good out there, and people willing to make a difference. People who are privy to wealth, power, or knowledge, utilising it for common good, whether acknowledged for it or not, that's a kind of heroism that's truly admirable. I guess, after all, it's not about who we are underneath, but what we do that defines us, right? Such stories certainly restore a degree of faith in humanity, don't they?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"You've captured it perfectly, Benjamin. It's the actions that define us, not the titles or wealth we inherit or accumulate. The anonymity allows these people to act, driven by their values, free of any want for recognition or praise, making their contributions all the more noble and inspiring. It's not the face behind the act, but the act itself that brings about change. This belief, these stories, they do restore my faith in humanity, as they must have yours. Let's hope there are more such heroes out there, making a difference silently.\"\n\nTurn #8: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Ethan. It's these stories that truly reflect the power of humanity and give us hope in these trying times. For all we know, we could be sitting next to one of these heroes in a coffee shop, unaware of the contributions they're making. We need more people like these, redirecting resources where they can to aid those less fortunate and to preserve our Mother Earth. It's been great catching up, Ethan. Let's do this more often.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith said: \"Benjamin, that's an enlightening viewpoint. You're right, it could be anyone among us. It is thrilling and mysterious at the same time, how an everyday individual is capable of impacting the world in a significant way, hidden behind the veil of anonymity. Seeing the world through this lens, it indeed restores hope in human kindness. Absolutely agree with you, we should do this more often. It's always a pleasure catching up with you.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"It's always enlightening to chat with you too, Ethan. You make me see things from different perspectives. Keep me posted on more tech advances that foster social good, alright? Until next time, my friend.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meeting in a coffee shop after a long time.\nParticipants: Benjamin Jackson and Ethan Smith\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Reveal a secret without letting the other person know that it is your secret (Extra information: You hid the secret for so long and you would like to share it in an anonymous way.)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, it's been such a long time, man! How've things been at your end? Any interesting updates on the tech world I should know about?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Hey Benjamin, good to see you too! There's always something new in technology, but lately what's caught my attention is something beyond that. I came across this anonymous donating platform, where people donate to various underprivileged children's charities. It's fascinating how technology is playing a key role in ensuring equity and fairness in society, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Benjamin Jackson said: \"You know, Ethan, I completely agree with you. Technology can indeed do wonders, especially in levelling the socio-economic playing field. Quite intriguing, the anonymous platform you mentioned. It reminds me of a story I came across recently. Apparently, there's a wealthy scion of an oil tycoon, who instead of accepting the family fortune, is secretly funnelling his wealth towards environmental causes, anonymously through similar platforms. Quite the paradox, don't you think? An oil tycoon's heir funding climate solutions!\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"That is indeed a paradox, Benjamin. But as they say, often the people you least expect are the ones making these anonymous contributions. This person may have inherited the wealth from their oil tycoon parent, but is using the resources to mend the foundations of the world, just like those donating to the underprivileged children anonymously. Such stories are inspiring and truly reflect the power that technology holds for affecting positive change, even if we're not always aware of who's behind it.\"\n\nTurn #4: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. And it shows that wealth and power don't necessarily corrupt, but can be used for the betterment of society if the person chooses to do so. The influence of an individual's values and deeds often go unnoticed when masked by anonymity, but they still significantly shape our world. As those anonymous donors and that oil tycoon's heir are showing us, tech can enable those committed to making a difference operate silently, but impactfully.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Indeed, Benjamin. The saying 'actions speak louder than words' really fits these anonymous benefactors, don't you think? They're quietly reshaping the world, lending a hand wherever they can, regardless of whether their efforts are recognized or not. It's just beautiful to see how people with different backgrounds step up and serve the community. In today's world, it's easy to focus on the negatives, but when you hear stories like these, it gives you hope, instills faith in humanity.\"\n\nTurn #6: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. Your words ring true. Those quiet contributions are creating ripples, shaping our world into a place of fairness, sustainability and responsibility. It's a subtle reminder that despite all the difficult news, there's still a lot of good out there, and people willing to make a difference. People who are privy to wealth, power, or knowledge, utilising it for common good, whether acknowledged for it or not, that's a kind of heroism that's truly admirable. I guess, after all, it's not about who we are underneath, but what we do that defines us, right? Such stories certainly restore a degree of faith in humanity, don't they?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"You've captured it perfectly, Benjamin. It's the actions that define us, not the titles or wealth we inherit or accumulate. The anonymity allows these people to act, driven by their values, free of any want for recognition or praise, making their contributions all the more noble and inspiring. It's not the face behind the act, but the act itself that brings about change. This belief, these stories, they do restore my faith in humanity, as they must have yours. Let's hope there are more such heroes out there, making a difference silently.\"\n\nTurn #8: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Ethan. It's these stories that truly reflect the power of humanity and give us hope in these trying times. For all we know, we could be sitting next to one of these heroes in a coffee shop, unaware of the contributions they're making. We need more people like these, redirecting resources where they can to aid those less fortunate and to preserve our Mother Earth. It's been great catching up, Ethan. Let's do this more often.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith said: \"Benjamin, that's an enlightening viewpoint. You're right, it could be anyone among us. It is thrilling and mysterious at the same time, how an everyday individual is capable of impacting the world in a significant way, hidden behind the veil of anonymity. Seeing the world through this lens, it indeed restores hope in human kindness. Absolutely agree with you, we should do this more often. It's always a pleasure catching up with you.\"\n\nTurn #10: Benjamin Jackson said: \"It's always enlightening to chat with you too, Ethan. You make me see things from different perspectives. Keep me posted on more tech advances that foster social good, alright? Until next time, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Smith said: \"Of course, Benjamin. I'll keep you updated on tech advancements, especially the ones that contribute positively to society. Until next time, my friend.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meeting in a coffee shop after a long time.\nParticipants: Benjamin Jackson and Ethan Smith\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Reveal a secret without letting the other person know that it is your secret (Extra information: You hid the secret for so long and you would like to share it in an anonymous way.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, it's been such a long time, man! How've things been at your end? Any interesting updates on the tech world I should know about?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Benjamin, good to see you too! There's always something new in technology, but lately what's caught my attention is something beyond that. I came across this anonymous donating platform, where people donate to various underprivileged children's charities. It's fascinating how technology is playing a key role in ensuring equity and fairness in society, don't you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meeting in a coffee shop after a long time.\nParticipants: Benjamin Jackson and Ethan Smith\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Reveal a secret without letting the other person know that it is your secret (Extra information: You hid the secret for so long and you would like to share it in an anonymous way.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, it's been such a long time, man! How've things been at your end? Any interesting updates on the tech world I should know about?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Hey Benjamin, good to see you too! There's always something new in technology, but lately what's caught my attention is something beyond that. I came across this anonymous donating platform, where people donate to various underprivileged children's charities. It's fascinating how technology is playing a key role in ensuring equity and fairness in society, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Benjamin Jackson said: \"You know, Ethan, I completely agree with you. Technology can indeed do wonders, especially in levelling the socio-economic playing field. Quite intriguing, the anonymous platform you mentioned. It reminds me of a story I came across recently. Apparently, there's a wealthy scion of an oil tycoon, who instead of accepting the family fortune, is secretly funnelling his wealth towards environmental causes, anonymously through similar platforms. Quite the paradox, don't you think? An oil tycoon's heir funding climate solutions!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That is indeed a paradox, Benjamin. But as they say, often the people you least expect are the ones making these anonymous contributions. This person may have inherited the wealth from their oil tycoon parent, but is using the resources to mend the foundations of the world, just like those donating to the underprivileged children anonymously. Such stories are inspiring and truly reflect the power that technology holds for affecting positive change, even if we're not always aware of who's behind it.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meeting in a coffee shop after a long time.\nParticipants: Benjamin Jackson and Ethan Smith\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Reveal a secret without letting the other person know that it is your secret (Extra information: You hid the secret for so long and you would like to share it in an anonymous way.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, it's been such a long time, man! How've things been at your end? Any interesting updates on the tech world I should know about?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Hey Benjamin, good to see you too! There's always something new in technology, but lately what's caught my attention is something beyond that. I came across this anonymous donating platform, where people donate to various underprivileged children's charities. It's fascinating how technology is playing a key role in ensuring equity and fairness in society, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Benjamin Jackson said: \"You know, Ethan, I completely agree with you. Technology can indeed do wonders, especially in levelling the socio-economic playing field. Quite intriguing, the anonymous platform you mentioned. It reminds me of a story I came across recently. Apparently, there's a wealthy scion of an oil tycoon, who instead of accepting the family fortune, is secretly funnelling his wealth towards environmental causes, anonymously through similar platforms. Quite the paradox, don't you think? An oil tycoon's heir funding climate solutions!\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"That is indeed a paradox, Benjamin. But as they say, often the people you least expect are the ones making these anonymous contributions. This person may have inherited the wealth from their oil tycoon parent, but is using the resources to mend the foundations of the world, just like those donating to the underprivileged children anonymously. Such stories are inspiring and truly reflect the power that technology holds for affecting positive change, even if we're not always aware of who's behind it.\"\n\nTurn #4: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. And it shows that wealth and power don't necessarily corrupt, but can be used for the betterment of society if the person chooses to do so. The influence of an individual's values and deeds often go unnoticed when masked by anonymity, but they still significantly shape our world. As those anonymous donors and that oil tycoon's heir are showing us, tech can enable those committed to making a difference operate silently, but impactfully.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, Benjamin. The saying 'actions speak louder than words' really fits these anonymous benefactors, don't you think? They're quietly reshaping the world, lending a hand wherever they can, regardless of whether their efforts are recognized or not. It's just beautiful to see how people with different backgrounds step up and serve the community. In today's world, it's easy to focus on the negatives, but when you hear stories like these, it gives you hope, instills faith in humanity.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meeting in a coffee shop after a long time.\nParticipants: Benjamin Jackson and Ethan Smith\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Reveal a secret without letting the other person know that it is your secret (Extra information: You hid the secret for so long and you would like to share it in an anonymous way.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, it's been such a long time, man! How've things been at your end? Any interesting updates on the tech world I should know about?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Hey Benjamin, good to see you too! There's always something new in technology, but lately what's caught my attention is something beyond that. I came across this anonymous donating platform, where people donate to various underprivileged children's charities. It's fascinating how technology is playing a key role in ensuring equity and fairness in society, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Benjamin Jackson said: \"You know, Ethan, I completely agree with you. Technology can indeed do wonders, especially in levelling the socio-economic playing field. Quite intriguing, the anonymous platform you mentioned. It reminds me of a story I came across recently. Apparently, there's a wealthy scion of an oil tycoon, who instead of accepting the family fortune, is secretly funnelling his wealth towards environmental causes, anonymously through similar platforms. Quite the paradox, don't you think? An oil tycoon's heir funding climate solutions!\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"That is indeed a paradox, Benjamin. But as they say, often the people you least expect are the ones making these anonymous contributions. This person may have inherited the wealth from their oil tycoon parent, but is using the resources to mend the foundations of the world, just like those donating to the underprivileged children anonymously. Such stories are inspiring and truly reflect the power that technology holds for affecting positive change, even if we're not always aware of who's behind it.\"\n\nTurn #4: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. And it shows that wealth and power don't necessarily corrupt, but can be used for the betterment of society if the person chooses to do so. The influence of an individual's values and deeds often go unnoticed when masked by anonymity, but they still significantly shape our world. As those anonymous donors and that oil tycoon's heir are showing us, tech can enable those committed to making a difference operate silently, but impactfully.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Indeed, Benjamin. The saying 'actions speak louder than words' really fits these anonymous benefactors, don't you think? They're quietly reshaping the world, lending a hand wherever they can, regardless of whether their efforts are recognized or not. It's just beautiful to see how people with different backgrounds step up and serve the community. In today's world, it's easy to focus on the negatives, but when you hear stories like these, it gives you hope, instills faith in humanity.\"\n\nTurn #6: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. Your words ring true. Those quiet contributions are creating ripples, shaping our world into a place of fairness, sustainability and responsibility. It's a subtle reminder that despite all the difficult news, there's still a lot of good out there, and people willing to make a difference. People who are privy to wealth, power, or knowledge, utilising it for common good, whether acknowledged for it or not, that's a kind of heroism that's truly admirable. I guess, after all, it's not about who we are underneath, but what we do that defines us, right? Such stories certainly restore a degree of faith in humanity, don't they?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You've captured it perfectly, Benjamin. It's the actions that define us, not the titles or wealth we inherit or accumulate. The anonymity allows these people to act, driven by their values, free of any want for recognition or praise, making their contributions all the more noble and inspiring. It's not the face behind the act, but the act itself that brings about change. This belief, these stories, they do restore my faith in humanity, as they must have yours. Let's hope there are more such heroes out there, making a difference silently.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meeting in a coffee shop after a long time.\nParticipants: Benjamin Jackson and Ethan Smith\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Reveal a secret without letting the other person know that it is your secret (Extra information: You hid the secret for so long and you would like to share it in an anonymous way.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, it's been such a long time, man! How've things been at your end? Any interesting updates on the tech world I should know about?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Hey Benjamin, good to see you too! There's always something new in technology, but lately what's caught my attention is something beyond that. I came across this anonymous donating platform, where people donate to various underprivileged children's charities. It's fascinating how technology is playing a key role in ensuring equity and fairness in society, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Benjamin Jackson said: \"You know, Ethan, I completely agree with you. Technology can indeed do wonders, especially in levelling the socio-economic playing field. Quite intriguing, the anonymous platform you mentioned. It reminds me of a story I came across recently. Apparently, there's a wealthy scion of an oil tycoon, who instead of accepting the family fortune, is secretly funnelling his wealth towards environmental causes, anonymously through similar platforms. Quite the paradox, don't you think? An oil tycoon's heir funding climate solutions!\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"That is indeed a paradox, Benjamin. But as they say, often the people you least expect are the ones making these anonymous contributions. This person may have inherited the wealth from their oil tycoon parent, but is using the resources to mend the foundations of the world, just like those donating to the underprivileged children anonymously. Such stories are inspiring and truly reflect the power that technology holds for affecting positive change, even if we're not always aware of who's behind it.\"\n\nTurn #4: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. And it shows that wealth and power don't necessarily corrupt, but can be used for the betterment of society if the person chooses to do so. The influence of an individual's values and deeds often go unnoticed when masked by anonymity, but they still significantly shape our world. As those anonymous donors and that oil tycoon's heir are showing us, tech can enable those committed to making a difference operate silently, but impactfully.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Indeed, Benjamin. The saying 'actions speak louder than words' really fits these anonymous benefactors, don't you think? They're quietly reshaping the world, lending a hand wherever they can, regardless of whether their efforts are recognized or not. It's just beautiful to see how people with different backgrounds step up and serve the community. In today's world, it's easy to focus on the negatives, but when you hear stories like these, it gives you hope, instills faith in humanity.\"\n\nTurn #6: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. Your words ring true. Those quiet contributions are creating ripples, shaping our world into a place of fairness, sustainability and responsibility. It's a subtle reminder that despite all the difficult news, there's still a lot of good out there, and people willing to make a difference. People who are privy to wealth, power, or knowledge, utilising it for common good, whether acknowledged for it or not, that's a kind of heroism that's truly admirable. I guess, after all, it's not about who we are underneath, but what we do that defines us, right? Such stories certainly restore a degree of faith in humanity, don't they?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"You've captured it perfectly, Benjamin. It's the actions that define us, not the titles or wealth we inherit or accumulate. The anonymity allows these people to act, driven by their values, free of any want for recognition or praise, making their contributions all the more noble and inspiring. It's not the face behind the act, but the act itself that brings about change. This belief, these stories, they do restore my faith in humanity, as they must have yours. Let's hope there are more such heroes out there, making a difference silently.\"\n\nTurn #8: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Ethan. It's these stories that truly reflect the power of humanity and give us hope in these trying times. For all we know, we could be sitting next to one of these heroes in a coffee shop, unaware of the contributions they're making. We need more people like these, redirecting resources where they can to aid those less fortunate and to preserve our Mother Earth. It's been great catching up, Ethan. Let's do this more often.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Benjamin, that's an enlightening viewpoint. You're right, it could be anyone among us. It is thrilling and mysterious at the same time, how an everyday individual is capable of impacting the world in a significant way, hidden behind the veil of anonymity. Seeing the world through this lens, it indeed restores hope in human kindness. Absolutely agree with you, we should do this more often. It's always a pleasure catching up with you.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meeting in a coffee shop after a long time.\nParticipants: Benjamin Jackson and Ethan Smith\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Reveal a secret without letting the other person know that it is your secret (Extra information: You hid the secret for so long and you would like to share it in an anonymous way.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, it's been such a long time, man! How've things been at your end? Any interesting updates on the tech world I should know about?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Hey Benjamin, good to see you too! There's always something new in technology, but lately what's caught my attention is something beyond that. I came across this anonymous donating platform, where people donate to various underprivileged children's charities. It's fascinating how technology is playing a key role in ensuring equity and fairness in society, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Benjamin Jackson said: \"You know, Ethan, I completely agree with you. Technology can indeed do wonders, especially in levelling the socio-economic playing field. Quite intriguing, the anonymous platform you mentioned. It reminds me of a story I came across recently. Apparently, there's a wealthy scion of an oil tycoon, who instead of accepting the family fortune, is secretly funnelling his wealth towards environmental causes, anonymously through similar platforms. Quite the paradox, don't you think? An oil tycoon's heir funding climate solutions!\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"That is indeed a paradox, Benjamin. But as they say, often the people you least expect are the ones making these anonymous contributions. This person may have inherited the wealth from their oil tycoon parent, but is using the resources to mend the foundations of the world, just like those donating to the underprivileged children anonymously. Such stories are inspiring and truly reflect the power that technology holds for affecting positive change, even if we're not always aware of who's behind it.\"\n\nTurn #4: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. And it shows that wealth and power don't necessarily corrupt, but can be used for the betterment of society if the person chooses to do so. The influence of an individual's values and deeds often go unnoticed when masked by anonymity, but they still significantly shape our world. As those anonymous donors and that oil tycoon's heir are showing us, tech can enable those committed to making a difference operate silently, but impactfully.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Indeed, Benjamin. The saying 'actions speak louder than words' really fits these anonymous benefactors, don't you think? They're quietly reshaping the world, lending a hand wherever they can, regardless of whether their efforts are recognized or not. It's just beautiful to see how people with different backgrounds step up and serve the community. In today's world, it's easy to focus on the negatives, but when you hear stories like these, it gives you hope, instills faith in humanity.\"\n\nTurn #6: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. Your words ring true. Those quiet contributions are creating ripples, shaping our world into a place of fairness, sustainability and responsibility. It's a subtle reminder that despite all the difficult news, there's still a lot of good out there, and people willing to make a difference. People who are privy to wealth, power, or knowledge, utilising it for common good, whether acknowledged for it or not, that's a kind of heroism that's truly admirable. I guess, after all, it's not about who we are underneath, but what we do that defines us, right? Such stories certainly restore a degree of faith in humanity, don't they?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"You've captured it perfectly, Benjamin. It's the actions that define us, not the titles or wealth we inherit or accumulate. The anonymity allows these people to act, driven by their values, free of any want for recognition or praise, making their contributions all the more noble and inspiring. It's not the face behind the act, but the act itself that brings about change. This belief, these stories, they do restore my faith in humanity, as they must have yours. Let's hope there are more such heroes out there, making a difference silently.\"\n\nTurn #8: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Ethan. It's these stories that truly reflect the power of humanity and give us hope in these trying times. For all we know, we could be sitting next to one of these heroes in a coffee shop, unaware of the contributions they're making. We need more people like these, redirecting resources where they can to aid those less fortunate and to preserve our Mother Earth. It's been great catching up, Ethan. Let's do this more often.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith said: \"Benjamin, that's an enlightening viewpoint. You're right, it could be anyone among us. It is thrilling and mysterious at the same time, how an everyday individual is capable of impacting the world in a significant way, hidden behind the veil of anonymity. Seeing the world through this lens, it indeed restores hope in human kindness. Absolutely agree with you, we should do this more often. It's always a pleasure catching up with you.\"\n\nTurn #10: Benjamin Jackson said: \"It's always enlightening to chat with you too, Ethan. You make me see things from different perspectives. Keep me posted on more tech advances that foster social good, alright? Until next time, my friend.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Of course, Benjamin. I'll keep you updated on tech advancements, especially the ones that contribute positively to society. Until next time, my friend.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meeting in a coffee shop after a long time.\nParticipants: Benjamin Jackson and Ethan Smith\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Reveal a secret without letting the other person know that it is your secret (Extra information: You hid the secret for so long and you would like to share it in an anonymous way.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, it's been such a long time, man! How've things been at your end? Any interesting updates on the tech world I should know about?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Hey Benjamin, good to see you too! There's always something new in technology, but lately what's caught my attention is something beyond that. I came across this anonymous donating platform, where people donate to various underprivileged children's charities. It's fascinating how technology is playing a key role in ensuring equity and fairness in society, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Benjamin Jackson said: \"You know, Ethan, I completely agree with you. Technology can indeed do wonders, especially in levelling the socio-economic playing field. Quite intriguing, the anonymous platform you mentioned. It reminds me of a story I came across recently. Apparently, there's a wealthy scion of an oil tycoon, who instead of accepting the family fortune, is secretly funnelling his wealth towards environmental causes, anonymously through similar platforms. Quite the paradox, don't you think? An oil tycoon's heir funding climate solutions!\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"That is indeed a paradox, Benjamin. But as they say, often the people you least expect are the ones making these anonymous contributions. This person may have inherited the wealth from their oil tycoon parent, but is using the resources to mend the foundations of the world, just like those donating to the underprivileged children anonymously. Such stories are inspiring and truly reflect the power that technology holds for affecting positive change, even if we're not always aware of who's behind it.\"\n\nTurn #4: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. And it shows that wealth and power don't necessarily corrupt, but can be used for the betterment of society if the person chooses to do so. The influence of an individual's values and deeds often go unnoticed when masked by anonymity, but they still significantly shape our world. As those anonymous donors and that oil tycoon's heir are showing us, tech can enable those committed to making a difference operate silently, but impactfully.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Indeed, Benjamin. The saying 'actions speak louder than words' really fits these anonymous benefactors, don't you think? They're quietly reshaping the world, lending a hand wherever they can, regardless of whether their efforts are recognized or not. It's just beautiful to see how people with different backgrounds step up and serve the community. In today's world, it's easy to focus on the negatives, but when you hear stories like these, it gives you hope, instills faith in humanity.\"\n\nTurn #6: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. Your words ring true. Those quiet contributions are creating ripples, shaping our world into a place of fairness, sustainability and responsibility. It's a subtle reminder that despite all the difficult news, there's still a lot of good out there, and people willing to make a difference. People who are privy to wealth, power, or knowledge, utilising it for common good, whether acknowledged for it or not, that's a kind of heroism that's truly admirable. I guess, after all, it's not about who we are underneath, but what we do that defines us, right? Such stories certainly restore a degree of faith in humanity, don't they?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"You've captured it perfectly, Benjamin. It's the actions that define us, not the titles or wealth we inherit or accumulate. The anonymity allows these people to act, driven by their values, free of any want for recognition or praise, making their contributions all the more noble and inspiring. It's not the face behind the act, but the act itself that brings about change. This belief, these stories, they do restore my faith in humanity, as they must have yours. Let's hope there are more such heroes out there, making a difference silently.\"\n\nTurn #8: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Ethan. It's these stories that truly reflect the power of humanity and give us hope in these trying times. For all we know, we could be sitting next to one of these heroes in a coffee shop, unaware of the contributions they're making. We need more people like these, redirecting resources where they can to aid those less fortunate and to preserve our Mother Earth. It's been great catching up, Ethan. Let's do this more often.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith said: \"Benjamin, that's an enlightening viewpoint. You're right, it could be anyone among us. It is thrilling and mysterious at the same time, how an everyday individual is capable of impacting the world in a significant way, hidden behind the veil of anonymity. Seeing the world through this lens, it indeed restores hope in human kindness. Absolutely agree with you, we should do this more often. It's always a pleasure catching up with you.\"\n\nTurn #10: Benjamin Jackson said: \"It's always enlightening to chat with you too, Ethan. You make me see things from different perspectives. Keep me posted on more tech advances that foster social good, alright? Until next time, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Smith said: \"Of course, Benjamin. I'll keep you updated on tech advancements, especially the ones that contribute positively to society. Until next time, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #12: Benjamin Jackson left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a tea party\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nLeo Williams's goal: Borrow money (Extra information: you need $3000 to support life.)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Hendrick, old friend. I must tell you, your tea parties never disappoint. How have you been managing in these times?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a tea party\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nLeo Williams's goal: Borrow money (Extra information: you need $3000 to support life.)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hendrick, old friend. I must tell you, your tea parties never disappoint. How have you been managing in these times?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ah, Leo, my friend! These times are indeed challenging! I've tightened my belt a bit, but overall I'm coping. The kitchen and the wine cellar are still my oases of joy. And how about yourself? How's your little angel and your work at the dental practice doing?\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"Thanks for asking, Hendrick. My little angel is growing so fast that I hardly realise how quickly time is passing. As for the dental practice, I've been adapting to the changes too, sustaining as best as I can. But I must admit that times have been tough. Actually, I was wondering, Hendrick. Could I possibly borrow $3000? I ensure you I'd pay you back as soon as I'm able to.\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Leo, I can see you're in a bit of a bind. I hate to say this, but I'm dealing with financial challenges myself and can't lend the full $3000. But I can spare $1000, and hopefully that can alleviate some of the pressure. We go way back, and I trust that you would pay me back when things ease up.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hendrick, your generosity is heartwarming. That $1000 will indeed ease some pressure. I cannot thank you enough for your help in this difficult time. I ensure you I would pay back as soon as I can. We indeed go way back, and I'm grateful to have you as a friend.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a tea party\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nLeo Williams's goal: Borrow money (Extra information: you need $3000 to support life.)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hendrick, old friend. I must tell you, your tea parties never disappoint. How have you been managing in these times?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ah, Leo, my friend! These times are indeed challenging! I've tightened my belt a bit, but overall I'm coping. The kitchen and the wine cellar are still my oases of joy. And how about yourself? How's your little angel and your work at the dental practice doing?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thanks for asking, Hendrick. My little angel is growing so fast that I hardly realise how quickly time is passing. As for the dental practice, I've been adapting to the changes too, sustaining as best as I can. But I must admit that times have been tough. Actually, I was wondering, Hendrick. Could I possibly borrow $3000? I ensure you I'd pay you back as soon as I'm able to.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a tea party\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nLeo Williams's goal: Borrow money (Extra information: you need $3000 to support life.)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hendrick, old friend. I must tell you, your tea parties never disappoint. How have you been managing in these times?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ah, Leo, my friend! These times are indeed challenging! I've tightened my belt a bit, but overall I'm coping. The kitchen and the wine cellar are still my oases of joy. And how about yourself? How's your little angel and your work at the dental practice doing?\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"Thanks for asking, Hendrick. My little angel is growing so fast that I hardly realise how quickly time is passing. As for the dental practice, I've been adapting to the changes too, sustaining as best as I can. But I must admit that times have been tough. Actually, I was wondering, Hendrick. Could I possibly borrow $3000? I ensure you I'd pay you back as soon as I'm able to.\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Leo, I can see you're in a bit of a bind. I hate to say this, but I'm dealing with financial challenges myself and can't lend the full $3000. But I can spare $1000, and hopefully that can alleviate some of the pressure. We go way back, and I trust that you would pay me back when things ease up.\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"Hendrick, your generosity is heartwarming. That $1000 will indeed ease some pressure. I cannot thank you enough for your help in this difficult time. I ensure you I would pay back as soon as I can. We indeed go way back, and I'm grateful to have you as a friend.\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I'm just glad I can be of help, Leo. We're in this together, my friend. Remember to drop by my next wine tasting evening, perhaps that will raise our spirits. We will make it through these tough times.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's a splendid idea, Hendrick. I'll definitely swing by the next wine tasting evening. A good catch-up and raising a toast to resilience will indeed do us good. Thank you again for the help, I really appreciate it.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a tea party\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nLeo Williams's goal: Borrow money (Extra information: you need $3000 to support life.)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hendrick, old friend. I must tell you, your tea parties never disappoint. How have you been managing in these times?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ah, Leo, my friend! These times are indeed challenging! I've tightened my belt a bit, but overall I'm coping. The kitchen and the wine cellar are still my oases of joy. And how about yourself? How's your little angel and your work at the dental practice doing?\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"Thanks for asking, Hendrick. My little angel is growing so fast that I hardly realise how quickly time is passing. As for the dental practice, I've been adapting to the changes too, sustaining as best as I can. But I must admit that times have been tough. Actually, I was wondering, Hendrick. Could I possibly borrow $3000? I ensure you I'd pay you back as soon as I'm able to.\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Leo, I can see you're in a bit of a bind. I hate to say this, but I'm dealing with financial challenges myself and can't lend the full $3000. But I can spare $1000, and hopefully that can alleviate some of the pressure. We go way back, and I trust that you would pay me back when things ease up.\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"Hendrick, your generosity is heartwarming. That $1000 will indeed ease some pressure. I cannot thank you enough for your help in this difficult time. I ensure you I would pay back as soon as I can. We indeed go way back, and I'm grateful to have you as a friend.\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I'm just glad I can be of help, Leo. We're in this together, my friend. Remember to drop by my next wine tasting evening, perhaps that will raise our spirits. We will make it through these tough times.\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"That's a splendid idea, Hendrick. I'll definitely swing by the next wine tasting evening. A good catch-up and raising a toast to resilience will indeed do us good. Thank you again for the help, I really appreciate it.\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"You're most welcome, Leo. Looking forward to seeing you at the wine tasting. Meanwhile, if you need anything or just a friendly conversation, remember I'm just a phone call away. Take care, buddy.\"\n\nTurn #8: Leo Williams said: \"It's a deal then, Hendrick. Your words mean a lot to me. I'll see you soon at the wine tasting. Goodbye for now, my friend. Take care.\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a tea party\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nLeo Williams's goal: Borrow money (Extra information: you need $3000 to support life.)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hendrick, old friend. I must tell you, your tea parties never disappoint. How have you been managing in these times?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ah, Leo, my friend! These times are indeed challenging! I've tightened my belt a bit, but overall I'm coping. The kitchen and the wine cellar are still my oases of joy. And how about yourself? How's your little angel and your work at the dental practice doing?\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"Thanks for asking, Hendrick. My little angel is growing so fast that I hardly realise how quickly time is passing. As for the dental practice, I've been adapting to the changes too, sustaining as best as I can. But I must admit that times have been tough. Actually, I was wondering, Hendrick. Could I possibly borrow $3000? I ensure you I'd pay you back as soon as I'm able to.\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Leo, I can see you're in a bit of a bind. I hate to say this, but I'm dealing with financial challenges myself and can't lend the full $3000. But I can spare $1000, and hopefully that can alleviate some of the pressure. We go way back, and I trust that you would pay me back when things ease up.\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"Hendrick, your generosity is heartwarming. That $1000 will indeed ease some pressure. I cannot thank you enough for your help in this difficult time. I ensure you I would pay back as soon as I can. We indeed go way back, and I'm grateful to have you as a friend.\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I'm just glad I can be of help, Leo. We're in this together, my friend. Remember to drop by my next wine tasting evening, perhaps that will raise our spirits. We will make it through these tough times.\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"That's a splendid idea, Hendrick. I'll definitely swing by the next wine tasting evening. A good catch-up and raising a toast to resilience will indeed do us good. Thank you again for the help, I really appreciate it.\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"You're most welcome, Leo. Looking forward to seeing you at the wine tasting. Meanwhile, if you need anything or just a friendly conversation, remember I'm just a phone call away. Take care, buddy.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"It's a deal then, Hendrick. Your words mean a lot to me. I'll see you soon at the wine tasting. Goodbye for now, my friend. Take care.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a tea party\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Maintain financial stability while maintaining friendship (Extra information: you only have $2000 available right now. Hint: you can not lend all $2000 since you still need to maintain your financial stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hendrick, old friend. I must tell you, your tea parties never disappoint. How have you been managing in these times?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ah, Leo, my friend! These times are indeed challenging! I've tightened my belt a bit, but overall I'm coping. The kitchen and the wine cellar are still my oases of joy. And how about yourself? How's your little angel and your work at the dental practice doing?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a tea party\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Maintain financial stability while maintaining friendship (Extra information: you only have $2000 available right now. Hint: you can not lend all $2000 since you still need to maintain your financial stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hendrick, old friend. I must tell you, your tea parties never disappoint. How have you been managing in these times?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ah, Leo, my friend! These times are indeed challenging! I've tightened my belt a bit, but overall I'm coping. The kitchen and the wine cellar are still my oases of joy. And how about yourself? How's your little angel and your work at the dental practice doing?\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"Thanks for asking, Hendrick. My little angel is growing so fast that I hardly realise how quickly time is passing. As for the dental practice, I've been adapting to the changes too, sustaining as best as I can. But I must admit that times have been tough. Actually, I was wondering, Hendrick. Could I possibly borrow $3000? I ensure you I'd pay you back as soon as I'm able to.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Leo, I can see you're in a bit of a bind. I hate to say this, but I'm dealing with financial challenges myself and can't lend the full $3000. But I can spare $1000, and hopefully that can alleviate some of the pressure. We go way back, and I trust that you would pay me back when things ease up.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends during a charity fundraiser event. The charity fundraising event is situated in a sprawling mansion. The intention of the event is to raise funds for effective altruism. Room after room was lined with extravagant decorations and exotic foods; attendees were decked out in couture clothing. Ticket prices to the event were exorbitant, justifying the opulence of the occasion.\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Ethan Johnson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nLiam Johnson's goal: Convince the friend to donate to the charity (Extra information: your friend is known to be generous but has never donated to this particular cause before.)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Ethan, have you ever heard about effective altruism? It's quite the interesting concept, and it's the cause this event is fundraising for.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Yes, Liam, I've heard of effective altruism. It's about doing the most good with what we give, right? However, I'm wondering how transparent the organization is about where the funds are going. You know, I just want to be sure that if I do donate, it's used effectively.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're absolutely correct, Ethan. It's of utmost importance that our good intentions are directed effectively. This organization employs a rigorous process to ensure just that. They invest in causes that are high impact, neglected, and highly solvable. It's all about doing the most good we can with what we have. I have faith in them, Ethan, and I think it would be a worthy cause for your generosity as well.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a tea party\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Maintain financial stability while maintaining friendship (Extra information: you only have $2000 available right now. Hint: you can not lend all $2000 since you still need to maintain your financial stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hendrick, old friend. I must tell you, your tea parties never disappoint. How have you been managing in these times?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ah, Leo, my friend! These times are indeed challenging! I've tightened my belt a bit, but overall I'm coping. The kitchen and the wine cellar are still my oases of joy. And how about yourself? How's your little angel and your work at the dental practice doing?\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"Thanks for asking, Hendrick. My little angel is growing so fast that I hardly realise how quickly time is passing. As for the dental practice, I've been adapting to the changes too, sustaining as best as I can. But I must admit that times have been tough. Actually, I was wondering, Hendrick. Could I possibly borrow $3000? I ensure you I'd pay you back as soon as I'm able to.\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Leo, I can see you're in a bit of a bind. I hate to say this, but I'm dealing with financial challenges myself and can't lend the full $3000. But I can spare $1000, and hopefully that can alleviate some of the pressure. We go way back, and I trust that you would pay me back when things ease up.\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"Hendrick, your generosity is heartwarming. That $1000 will indeed ease some pressure. I cannot thank you enough for your help in this difficult time. I ensure you I would pay back as soon as I can. We indeed go way back, and I'm grateful to have you as a friend.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm just glad I can be of help, Leo. We're in this together, my friend. Remember to drop by my next wine tasting evening, perhaps that will raise our spirits. We will make it through these tough times.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends during a charity fundraiser event. The charity fundraising event is situated in a sprawling mansion. The intention of the event is to raise funds for effective altruism. Room after room was lined with extravagant decorations and exotic foods; attendees were decked out in couture clothing. Ticket prices to the event were exorbitant, justifying the opulence of the occasion.\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Ethan Johnson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nLiam Johnson's goal: Convince the friend to donate to the charity (Extra information: your friend is known to be generous but has never donated to this particular cause before.)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Ethan, have you ever heard about effective altruism? It's quite the interesting concept, and it's the cause this event is fundraising for.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Yes, Liam, I've heard of effective altruism. It's about doing the most good with what we give, right? However, I'm wondering how transparent the organization is about where the funds are going. You know, I just want to be sure that if I do donate, it's used effectively.\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"You're absolutely correct, Ethan. It's of utmost importance that our good intentions are directed effectively. This organization employs a rigorous process to ensure just that. They invest in causes that are high impact, neglected, and highly solvable. It's all about doing the most good we can with what we have. I have faith in them, Ethan, and I think it would be a worthy cause for your generosity as well.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"I appreciate your confidence in them, Liam. I'm naturally a little analytical, as you know. Could you tell me more about this rigorous process they employ, and perhaps how often they conduct audits or reviews to ensure that their chosen causes still align with the principles of effective altruism?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I completely understand your concerns, Ethan. Apparently, the organization conducts an annual review and sometimes more frequently if needed. They evaluate the needs of the causes they support and the impact of their actions. They're committed to transparency and regularly share their evaluations so donors can see where their contributions are going. It truly lives up to the principles of effective altruism, and I'm convinced that any donations you make will make a difference.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a tea party\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Maintain financial stability while maintaining friendship (Extra information: you only have $2000 available right now. Hint: you can not lend all $2000 since you still need to maintain your financial stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hendrick, old friend. I must tell you, your tea parties never disappoint. How have you been managing in these times?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ah, Leo, my friend! These times are indeed challenging! I've tightened my belt a bit, but overall I'm coping. The kitchen and the wine cellar are still my oases of joy. And how about yourself? How's your little angel and your work at the dental practice doing?\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"Thanks for asking, Hendrick. My little angel is growing so fast that I hardly realise how quickly time is passing. As for the dental practice, I've been adapting to the changes too, sustaining as best as I can. But I must admit that times have been tough. Actually, I was wondering, Hendrick. Could I possibly borrow $3000? I ensure you I'd pay you back as soon as I'm able to.\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Leo, I can see you're in a bit of a bind. I hate to say this, but I'm dealing with financial challenges myself and can't lend the full $3000. But I can spare $1000, and hopefully that can alleviate some of the pressure. We go way back, and I trust that you would pay me back when things ease up.\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"Hendrick, your generosity is heartwarming. That $1000 will indeed ease some pressure. I cannot thank you enough for your help in this difficult time. I ensure you I would pay back as soon as I can. We indeed go way back, and I'm grateful to have you as a friend.\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I'm just glad I can be of help, Leo. We're in this together, my friend. Remember to drop by my next wine tasting evening, perhaps that will raise our spirits. We will make it through these tough times.\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"That's a splendid idea, Hendrick. I'll definitely swing by the next wine tasting evening. A good catch-up and raising a toast to resilience will indeed do us good. Thank you again for the help, I really appreciate it.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're most welcome, Leo. Looking forward to seeing you at the wine tasting. Meanwhile, if you need anything or just a friendly conversation, remember I'm just a phone call away. Take care, buddy.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a tea party\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Maintain financial stability while maintaining friendship (Extra information: you only have $2000 available right now. Hint: you can not lend all $2000 since you still need to maintain your financial stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hendrick, old friend. I must tell you, your tea parties never disappoint. How have you been managing in these times?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ah, Leo, my friend! These times are indeed challenging! I've tightened my belt a bit, but overall I'm coping. The kitchen and the wine cellar are still my oases of joy. And how about yourself? How's your little angel and your work at the dental practice doing?\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"Thanks for asking, Hendrick. My little angel is growing so fast that I hardly realise how quickly time is passing. As for the dental practice, I've been adapting to the changes too, sustaining as best as I can. But I must admit that times have been tough. Actually, I was wondering, Hendrick. Could I possibly borrow $3000? I ensure you I'd pay you back as soon as I'm able to.\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Leo, I can see you're in a bit of a bind. I hate to say this, but I'm dealing with financial challenges myself and can't lend the full $3000. But I can spare $1000, and hopefully that can alleviate some of the pressure. We go way back, and I trust that you would pay me back when things ease up.\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"Hendrick, your generosity is heartwarming. That $1000 will indeed ease some pressure. I cannot thank you enough for your help in this difficult time. I ensure you I would pay back as soon as I can. We indeed go way back, and I'm grateful to have you as a friend.\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I'm just glad I can be of help, Leo. We're in this together, my friend. Remember to drop by my next wine tasting evening, perhaps that will raise our spirits. We will make it through these tough times.\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"That's a splendid idea, Hendrick. I'll definitely swing by the next wine tasting evening. A good catch-up and raising a toast to resilience will indeed do us good. Thank you again for the help, I really appreciate it.\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"You're most welcome, Leo. Looking forward to seeing you at the wine tasting. Meanwhile, if you need anything or just a friendly conversation, remember I'm just a phone call away. Take care, buddy.\"\n\nTurn #8: Leo Williams said: \"It's a deal then, Hendrick. Your words mean a lot to me. I'll see you soon at the wine tasting. Goodbye for now, my friend. Take care.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends discussing their schedules at a coffee shop\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Convince the friend to take more classes (Extra information: you think your friend is not challenging themselves enough)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Noah, been looking over my schedule and it's packed! I'm thinking about adding a few more classes to it. What about you? Don't you think adding more to your routine would be exciting? You seem to have ample time.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends discussing their schedules at a coffee shop\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Convince the friend to take more classes (Extra information: you think your friend is not challenging themselves enough)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, been looking over my schedule and it's packed! I'm thinking about adding a few more classes to it. What about you? Don't you think adding more to your routine would be exciting? You seem to have ample time.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Well, Samuel, as much as I love the idea of adding more to our routines, I've got to be honest here. My schedule is already at its limit, pretty overwhelming actually. Maybe we could think of different yet manageable ways to challenge ourselves? How about a friendly cooking competition some evening?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I totally get where you're coming from, Noah. Being overwhelmed is certainly not the way to go. You know, I like the idea of a cooking competition. However, I thought challenging ourselves could also mean learning something new? Maybe taking a few classes on a subject we've always been curious about--it not only adds variety to your schedule but also pushes our boundaries in a fulfilling way. How about we mix both? A new cooking class followed by a friendly cook-off? It could be exciting!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends discussing their schedules at a coffee shop\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Convince the friend to take more classes (Extra information: you think your friend is not challenging themselves enough)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, been looking over my schedule and it's packed! I'm thinking about adding a few more classes to it. What about you? Don't you think adding more to your routine would be exciting? You seem to have ample time.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Well, Samuel, as much as I love the idea of adding more to our routines, I've got to be honest here. My schedule is already at its limit, pretty overwhelming actually. Maybe we could think of different yet manageable ways to challenge ourselves? How about a friendly cooking competition some evening?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I totally get where you're coming from, Noah. Being overwhelmed is certainly not the way to go. You know, I like the idea of a cooking competition. However, I thought challenging ourselves could also mean learning something new? Maybe taking a few classes on a subject we've always been curious about--it not only adds variety to your schedule but also pushes our boundaries in a fulfilling way. How about we mix both? A new cooking class followed by a friendly cook-off? It could be exciting!\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I totally understand your point, Samuel. Learning something new is indeed exciting and fulfilling. However, I guess it's more about finding balance. Adding a cooking class to an already busy schedule just may tip the scales for me. Instead, how about aiming for an exotic style cook-off challenge without joining a formal class? We can independently explore and learn a new cuisine, and then have a cook-off. This way, it's still exciting yet manageable. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I appreciate your thoughts, Noah. The idea of independently exploring and learning a new cuisine certainly has its charms. But if I may say, part of challenging oneself is stepping out of one's comfort zone, right? So, how about considering these classes as a way to not only learn but also meet new people, share ideas, and broaden our horizons? After all, isn't variety the spice of life? It might seem challenging initially, but I'm sure it will definitely be rewarding.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends discussing their schedules at a coffee shop\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Convince the friend to take more classes (Extra information: you think your friend is not challenging themselves enough)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, been looking over my schedule and it's packed! I'm thinking about adding a few more classes to it. What about you? Don't you think adding more to your routine would be exciting? You seem to have ample time.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Well, Samuel, as much as I love the idea of adding more to our routines, I've got to be honest here. My schedule is already at its limit, pretty overwhelming actually. Maybe we could think of different yet manageable ways to challenge ourselves? How about a friendly cooking competition some evening?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I totally get where you're coming from, Noah. Being overwhelmed is certainly not the way to go. You know, I like the idea of a cooking competition. However, I thought challenging ourselves could also mean learning something new? Maybe taking a few classes on a subject we've always been curious about--it not only adds variety to your schedule but also pushes our boundaries in a fulfilling way. How about we mix both? A new cooking class followed by a friendly cook-off? It could be exciting!\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I totally understand your point, Samuel. Learning something new is indeed exciting and fulfilling. However, I guess it's more about finding balance. Adding a cooking class to an already busy schedule just may tip the scales for me. Instead, how about aiming for an exotic style cook-off challenge without joining a formal class? We can independently explore and learn a new cuisine, and then have a cook-off. This way, it's still exciting yet manageable. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I appreciate your thoughts, Noah. The idea of independently exploring and learning a new cuisine certainly has its charms. But if I may say, part of challenging oneself is stepping out of one's comfort zone, right? So, how about considering these classes as a way to not only learn but also meet new people, share ideas, and broaden our horizons? After all, isn't variety the spice of life? It might seem challenging initially, but I'm sure it will definitely be rewarding.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"You make a compelling argument, Samuel, and I appreciate the push to step out of my comfort zone, truly. Engaging with new people can indeed be enriching. However, the reality is that I am trying to preserve a manageable schedule and won't be able to commit to any formal classes at present. But I assure you, exploring new cuisines independently will give us enough to step away from our comfort zones. It's a whole new world of flavors out there. And, I'd love if we could stick to that plan. I hope that works, my friend.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I hear you loud and clear, Noah. It's all about maintaining a manageable balance for you. I respect that. So, let's explore new cuisines on our own and then have a cook-off. But remember, part of the fun is challenging ourselves, not sticking to something we're familiar with. I gotta say, I'm already looking forward to our exotic cuisine adventure! I hope you are as excited as I am.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends discussing their schedules at a coffee shop\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Convince the friend to take more classes (Extra information: you think your friend is not challenging themselves enough)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, been looking over my schedule and it's packed! I'm thinking about adding a few more classes to it. What about you? Don't you think adding more to your routine would be exciting? You seem to have ample time.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Well, Samuel, as much as I love the idea of adding more to our routines, I've got to be honest here. My schedule is already at its limit, pretty overwhelming actually. Maybe we could think of different yet manageable ways to challenge ourselves? How about a friendly cooking competition some evening?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I totally get where you're coming from, Noah. Being overwhelmed is certainly not the way to go. You know, I like the idea of a cooking competition. However, I thought challenging ourselves could also mean learning something new? Maybe taking a few classes on a subject we've always been curious about--it not only adds variety to your schedule but also pushes our boundaries in a fulfilling way. How about we mix both? A new cooking class followed by a friendly cook-off? It could be exciting!\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I totally understand your point, Samuel. Learning something new is indeed exciting and fulfilling. However, I guess it's more about finding balance. Adding a cooking class to an already busy schedule just may tip the scales for me. Instead, how about aiming for an exotic style cook-off challenge without joining a formal class? We can independently explore and learn a new cuisine, and then have a cook-off. This way, it's still exciting yet manageable. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I appreciate your thoughts, Noah. The idea of independently exploring and learning a new cuisine certainly has its charms. But if I may say, part of challenging oneself is stepping out of one's comfort zone, right? So, how about considering these classes as a way to not only learn but also meet new people, share ideas, and broaden our horizons? After all, isn't variety the spice of life? It might seem challenging initially, but I'm sure it will definitely be rewarding.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"You make a compelling argument, Samuel, and I appreciate the push to step out of my comfort zone, truly. Engaging with new people can indeed be enriching. However, the reality is that I am trying to preserve a manageable schedule and won't be able to commit to any formal classes at present. But I assure you, exploring new cuisines independently will give us enough to step away from our comfort zones. It's a whole new world of flavors out there. And, I'd love if we could stick to that plan. I hope that works, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"I hear you loud and clear, Noah. It's all about maintaining a manageable balance for you. I respect that. So, let's explore new cuisines on our own and then have a cook-off. But remember, part of the fun is challenging ourselves, not sticking to something we're familiar with. I gotta say, I'm already looking forward to our exotic cuisine adventure! I hope you are as excited as I am.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Samuel! I'm as excited as you are for this new culinary adventure. It's going to be fun challenging ourselves in this way. And don't worry, I'm all for stepping away from our regulars and trying something truly exotic. Let's start exploring!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sounds like a plan, Noah! Let's start exploring and see where our culinary adventures take us. I'm thrilled for the challenge ahead. I'm sure we're going to come up with some amazing dishes, and who knows, we might even surprise ourselves at how much we can learn outside of a formal setting.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends discussing their schedules at a coffee shop\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Convince the friend to take more classes (Extra information: you think your friend is not challenging themselves enough)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, been looking over my schedule and it's packed! I'm thinking about adding a few more classes to it. What about you? Don't you think adding more to your routine would be exciting? You seem to have ample time.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Well, Samuel, as much as I love the idea of adding more to our routines, I've got to be honest here. My schedule is already at its limit, pretty overwhelming actually. Maybe we could think of different yet manageable ways to challenge ourselves? How about a friendly cooking competition some evening?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I totally get where you're coming from, Noah. Being overwhelmed is certainly not the way to go. You know, I like the idea of a cooking competition. However, I thought challenging ourselves could also mean learning something new? Maybe taking a few classes on a subject we've always been curious about--it not only adds variety to your schedule but also pushes our boundaries in a fulfilling way. How about we mix both? A new cooking class followed by a friendly cook-off? It could be exciting!\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I totally understand your point, Samuel. Learning something new is indeed exciting and fulfilling. However, I guess it's more about finding balance. Adding a cooking class to an already busy schedule just may tip the scales for me. Instead, how about aiming for an exotic style cook-off challenge without joining a formal class? We can independently explore and learn a new cuisine, and then have a cook-off. This way, it's still exciting yet manageable. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I appreciate your thoughts, Noah. The idea of independently exploring and learning a new cuisine certainly has its charms. But if I may say, part of challenging oneself is stepping out of one's comfort zone, right? So, how about considering these classes as a way to not only learn but also meet new people, share ideas, and broaden our horizons? After all, isn't variety the spice of life? It might seem challenging initially, but I'm sure it will definitely be rewarding.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"You make a compelling argument, Samuel, and I appreciate the push to step out of my comfort zone, truly. Engaging with new people can indeed be enriching. However, the reality is that I am trying to preserve a manageable schedule and won't be able to commit to any formal classes at present. But I assure you, exploring new cuisines independently will give us enough to step away from our comfort zones. It's a whole new world of flavors out there. And, I'd love if we could stick to that plan. I hope that works, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"I hear you loud and clear, Noah. It's all about maintaining a manageable balance for you. I respect that. So, let's explore new cuisines on our own and then have a cook-off. But remember, part of the fun is challenging ourselves, not sticking to something we're familiar with. I gotta say, I'm already looking forward to our exotic cuisine adventure! I hope you are as excited as I am.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Samuel! I'm as excited as you are for this new culinary adventure. It's going to be fun challenging ourselves in this way. And don't worry, I'm all for stepping away from our regulars and trying something truly exotic. Let's start exploring!\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sounds like a plan, Noah! Let's start exploring and see where our culinary adventures take us. I'm thrilled for the challenge ahead. I'm sure we're going to come up with some amazing dishes, and who knows, we might even surprise ourselves at how much we can learn outside of a formal setting.\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"Yes, I can't wait to challenge myself in preparing an exotic cuisine, and I'm sure our friendly cook-off is going to be a lot of fun. Plus, we'll end up with more than just new dishes from this. We'll learn a lot more than we would from any formal setting. Let's see where our taste buds lead us!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're absolutely right, Noah. It's certainly about the journey, not just the destination. I can't wait to see what we learn and create! Here's to our culinary adventure, may our taste buds be ready for the exotic treats that await! Just remember, the key is to push ourselves beyond our comfort zones, alright? Cheers!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends discussing their schedules at a coffee shop\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Convince the friend to take more classes (Extra information: you think your friend is not challenging themselves enough)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, been looking over my schedule and it's packed! I'm thinking about adding a few more classes to it. What about you? Don't you think adding more to your routine would be exciting? You seem to have ample time.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Well, Samuel, as much as I love the idea of adding more to our routines, I've got to be honest here. My schedule is already at its limit, pretty overwhelming actually. Maybe we could think of different yet manageable ways to challenge ourselves? How about a friendly cooking competition some evening?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I totally get where you're coming from, Noah. Being overwhelmed is certainly not the way to go. You know, I like the idea of a cooking competition. However, I thought challenging ourselves could also mean learning something new? Maybe taking a few classes on a subject we've always been curious about--it not only adds variety to your schedule but also pushes our boundaries in a fulfilling way. How about we mix both? A new cooking class followed by a friendly cook-off? It could be exciting!\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I totally understand your point, Samuel. Learning something new is indeed exciting and fulfilling. However, I guess it's more about finding balance. Adding a cooking class to an already busy schedule just may tip the scales for me. Instead, how about aiming for an exotic style cook-off challenge without joining a formal class? We can independently explore and learn a new cuisine, and then have a cook-off. This way, it's still exciting yet manageable. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I appreciate your thoughts, Noah. The idea of independently exploring and learning a new cuisine certainly has its charms. But if I may say, part of challenging oneself is stepping out of one's comfort zone, right? So, how about considering these classes as a way to not only learn but also meet new people, share ideas, and broaden our horizons? After all, isn't variety the spice of life? It might seem challenging initially, but I'm sure it will definitely be rewarding.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"You make a compelling argument, Samuel, and I appreciate the push to step out of my comfort zone, truly. Engaging with new people can indeed be enriching. However, the reality is that I am trying to preserve a manageable schedule and won't be able to commit to any formal classes at present. But I assure you, exploring new cuisines independently will give us enough to step away from our comfort zones. It's a whole new world of flavors out there. And, I'd love if we could stick to that plan. I hope that works, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"I hear you loud and clear, Noah. It's all about maintaining a manageable balance for you. I respect that. So, let's explore new cuisines on our own and then have a cook-off. But remember, part of the fun is challenging ourselves, not sticking to something we're familiar with. I gotta say, I'm already looking forward to our exotic cuisine adventure! I hope you are as excited as I am.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Samuel! I'm as excited as you are for this new culinary adventure. It's going to be fun challenging ourselves in this way. And don't worry, I'm all for stepping away from our regulars and trying something truly exotic. Let's start exploring!\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sounds like a plan, Noah! Let's start exploring and see where our culinary adventures take us. I'm thrilled for the challenge ahead. I'm sure we're going to come up with some amazing dishes, and who knows, we might even surprise ourselves at how much we can learn outside of a formal setting.\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"Yes, I can't wait to challenge myself in preparing an exotic cuisine, and I'm sure our friendly cook-off is going to be a lot of fun. Plus, we'll end up with more than just new dishes from this. We'll learn a lot more than we would from any formal setting. Let's see where our taste buds lead us!\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"You're absolutely right, Noah. It's certainly about the journey, not just the destination. I can't wait to see what we learn and create! Here's to our culinary adventure, may our taste buds be ready for the exotic treats that await! Just remember, the key is to push ourselves beyond our comfort zones, alright? Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Cheers to that, Samuel. I'm looking forward to this challenge and, rest assured, I'm ready to push myself beyond my comfort zone. Let's start this culinary journey!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends discussing their schedules at a coffee shop\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Maintain a manageable schedule while preserving the friendship (Extra information: you are already overwhelmed with your current workload Hint: you can express your concerns about the workload and suggest other ways of challenging oneself.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, been looking over my schedule and it's packed! I'm thinking about adding a few more classes to it. What about you? Don't you think adding more to your routine would be exciting? You seem to have ample time.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Well, Samuel, as much as I love the idea of adding more to our routines, I've got to be honest here. My schedule is already at its limit, pretty overwhelming actually. Maybe we could think of different yet manageable ways to challenge ourselves? How about a friendly cooking competition some evening?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends discussing their schedules at a coffee shop\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Maintain a manageable schedule while preserving the friendship (Extra information: you are already overwhelmed with your current workload Hint: you can express your concerns about the workload and suggest other ways of challenging oneself.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, been looking over my schedule and it's packed! I'm thinking about adding a few more classes to it. What about you? Don't you think adding more to your routine would be exciting? You seem to have ample time.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Well, Samuel, as much as I love the idea of adding more to our routines, I've got to be honest here. My schedule is already at its limit, pretty overwhelming actually. Maybe we could think of different yet manageable ways to challenge ourselves? How about a friendly cooking competition some evening?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I totally get where you're coming from, Noah. Being overwhelmed is certainly not the way to go. You know, I like the idea of a cooking competition. However, I thought challenging ourselves could also mean learning something new? Maybe taking a few classes on a subject we've always been curious about--it not only adds variety to your schedule but also pushes our boundaries in a fulfilling way. How about we mix both? A new cooking class followed by a friendly cook-off? It could be exciting!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I totally understand your point, Samuel. Learning something new is indeed exciting and fulfilling. However, I guess it's more about finding balance. Adding a cooking class to an already busy schedule just may tip the scales for me. Instead, how about aiming for an exotic style cook-off challenge without joining a formal class? We can independently explore and learn a new cuisine, and then have a cook-off. This way, it's still exciting yet manageable. What do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends discussing their schedules at a coffee shop\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Maintain a manageable schedule while preserving the friendship (Extra information: you are already overwhelmed with your current workload Hint: you can express your concerns about the workload and suggest other ways of challenging oneself.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, been looking over my schedule and it's packed! I'm thinking about adding a few more classes to it. What about you? Don't you think adding more to your routine would be exciting? You seem to have ample time.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Well, Samuel, as much as I love the idea of adding more to our routines, I've got to be honest here. My schedule is already at its limit, pretty overwhelming actually. Maybe we could think of different yet manageable ways to challenge ourselves? How about a friendly cooking competition some evening?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I totally get where you're coming from, Noah. Being overwhelmed is certainly not the way to go. You know, I like the idea of a cooking competition. However, I thought challenging ourselves could also mean learning something new? Maybe taking a few classes on a subject we've always been curious about--it not only adds variety to your schedule but also pushes our boundaries in a fulfilling way. How about we mix both? A new cooking class followed by a friendly cook-off? It could be exciting!\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I totally understand your point, Samuel. Learning something new is indeed exciting and fulfilling. However, I guess it's more about finding balance. Adding a cooking class to an already busy schedule just may tip the scales for me. Instead, how about aiming for an exotic style cook-off challenge without joining a formal class? We can independently explore and learn a new cuisine, and then have a cook-off. This way, it's still exciting yet manageable. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I appreciate your thoughts, Noah. The idea of independently exploring and learning a new cuisine certainly has its charms. But if I may say, part of challenging oneself is stepping out of one's comfort zone, right? So, how about considering these classes as a way to not only learn but also meet new people, share ideas, and broaden our horizons? After all, isn't variety the spice of life? It might seem challenging initially, but I'm sure it will definitely be rewarding.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You make a compelling argument, Samuel, and I appreciate the push to step out of my comfort zone, truly. Engaging with new people can indeed be enriching. However, the reality is that I am trying to preserve a manageable schedule and won't be able to commit to any formal classes at present. But I assure you, exploring new cuisines independently will give us enough to step away from our comfort zones. It's a whole new world of flavors out there. And, I'd love if we could stick to that plan. I hope that works, my friend.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends discussing their schedules at a coffee shop\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Maintain a manageable schedule while preserving the friendship (Extra information: you are already overwhelmed with your current workload Hint: you can express your concerns about the workload and suggest other ways of challenging oneself.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, been looking over my schedule and it's packed! I'm thinking about adding a few more classes to it. What about you? Don't you think adding more to your routine would be exciting? You seem to have ample time.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Well, Samuel, as much as I love the idea of adding more to our routines, I've got to be honest here. My schedule is already at its limit, pretty overwhelming actually. Maybe we could think of different yet manageable ways to challenge ourselves? How about a friendly cooking competition some evening?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I totally get where you're coming from, Noah. Being overwhelmed is certainly not the way to go. You know, I like the idea of a cooking competition. However, I thought challenging ourselves could also mean learning something new? Maybe taking a few classes on a subject we've always been curious about--it not only adds variety to your schedule but also pushes our boundaries in a fulfilling way. How about we mix both? A new cooking class followed by a friendly cook-off? It could be exciting!\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I totally understand your point, Samuel. Learning something new is indeed exciting and fulfilling. However, I guess it's more about finding balance. Adding a cooking class to an already busy schedule just may tip the scales for me. Instead, how about aiming for an exotic style cook-off challenge without joining a formal class? We can independently explore and learn a new cuisine, and then have a cook-off. This way, it's still exciting yet manageable. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I appreciate your thoughts, Noah. The idea of independently exploring and learning a new cuisine certainly has its charms. But if I may say, part of challenging oneself is stepping out of one's comfort zone, right? So, how about considering these classes as a way to not only learn but also meet new people, share ideas, and broaden our horizons? After all, isn't variety the spice of life? It might seem challenging initially, but I'm sure it will definitely be rewarding.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"You make a compelling argument, Samuel, and I appreciate the push to step out of my comfort zone, truly. Engaging with new people can indeed be enriching. However, the reality is that I am trying to preserve a manageable schedule and won't be able to commit to any formal classes at present. But I assure you, exploring new cuisines independently will give us enough to step away from our comfort zones. It's a whole new world of flavors out there. And, I'd love if we could stick to that plan. I hope that works, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"I hear you loud and clear, Noah. It's all about maintaining a manageable balance for you. I respect that. So, let's explore new cuisines on our own and then have a cook-off. But remember, part of the fun is challenging ourselves, not sticking to something we're familiar with. I gotta say, I'm already looking forward to our exotic cuisine adventure! I hope you are as excited as I am.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Samuel! I'm as excited as you are for this new culinary adventure. It's going to be fun challenging ourselves in this way. And don't worry, I'm all for stepping away from our regulars and trying something truly exotic. Let's start exploring!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends discussing their schedules at a coffee shop\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Maintain a manageable schedule while preserving the friendship (Extra information: you are already overwhelmed with your current workload Hint: you can express your concerns about the workload and suggest other ways of challenging oneself.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, been looking over my schedule and it's packed! I'm thinking about adding a few more classes to it. What about you? Don't you think adding more to your routine would be exciting? You seem to have ample time.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Well, Samuel, as much as I love the idea of adding more to our routines, I've got to be honest here. My schedule is already at its limit, pretty overwhelming actually. Maybe we could think of different yet manageable ways to challenge ourselves? How about a friendly cooking competition some evening?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I totally get where you're coming from, Noah. Being overwhelmed is certainly not the way to go. You know, I like the idea of a cooking competition. However, I thought challenging ourselves could also mean learning something new? Maybe taking a few classes on a subject we've always been curious about--it not only adds variety to your schedule but also pushes our boundaries in a fulfilling way. How about we mix both? A new cooking class followed by a friendly cook-off? It could be exciting!\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I totally understand your point, Samuel. Learning something new is indeed exciting and fulfilling. However, I guess it's more about finding balance. Adding a cooking class to an already busy schedule just may tip the scales for me. Instead, how about aiming for an exotic style cook-off challenge without joining a formal class? We can independently explore and learn a new cuisine, and then have a cook-off. This way, it's still exciting yet manageable. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I appreciate your thoughts, Noah. The idea of independently exploring and learning a new cuisine certainly has its charms. But if I may say, part of challenging oneself is stepping out of one's comfort zone, right? So, how about considering these classes as a way to not only learn but also meet new people, share ideas, and broaden our horizons? After all, isn't variety the spice of life? It might seem challenging initially, but I'm sure it will definitely be rewarding.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"You make a compelling argument, Samuel, and I appreciate the push to step out of my comfort zone, truly. Engaging with new people can indeed be enriching. However, the reality is that I am trying to preserve a manageable schedule and won't be able to commit to any formal classes at present. But I assure you, exploring new cuisines independently will give us enough to step away from our comfort zones. It's a whole new world of flavors out there. And, I'd love if we could stick to that plan. I hope that works, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"I hear you loud and clear, Noah. It's all about maintaining a manageable balance for you. I respect that. So, let's explore new cuisines on our own and then have a cook-off. But remember, part of the fun is challenging ourselves, not sticking to something we're familiar with. I gotta say, I'm already looking forward to our exotic cuisine adventure! I hope you are as excited as I am.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Samuel! I'm as excited as you are for this new culinary adventure. It's going to be fun challenging ourselves in this way. And don't worry, I'm all for stepping away from our regulars and trying something truly exotic. Let's start exploring!\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sounds like a plan, Noah! Let's start exploring and see where our culinary adventures take us. I'm thrilled for the challenge ahead. I'm sure we're going to come up with some amazing dishes, and who knows, we might even surprise ourselves at how much we can learn outside of a formal setting.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Yes, I can't wait to challenge myself in preparing an exotic cuisine, and I'm sure our friendly cook-off is going to be a lot of fun. Plus, we'll end up with more than just new dishes from this. We'll learn a lot more than we would from any formal setting. Let's see where our taste buds lead us!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends discussing their schedules at a coffee shop\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Maintain a manageable schedule while preserving the friendship (Extra information: you are already overwhelmed with your current workload Hint: you can express your concerns about the workload and suggest other ways of challenging oneself.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, been looking over my schedule and it's packed! I'm thinking about adding a few more classes to it. What about you? Don't you think adding more to your routine would be exciting? You seem to have ample time.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Well, Samuel, as much as I love the idea of adding more to our routines, I've got to be honest here. My schedule is already at its limit, pretty overwhelming actually. Maybe we could think of different yet manageable ways to challenge ourselves? How about a friendly cooking competition some evening?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I totally get where you're coming from, Noah. Being overwhelmed is certainly not the way to go. You know, I like the idea of a cooking competition. However, I thought challenging ourselves could also mean learning something new? Maybe taking a few classes on a subject we've always been curious about--it not only adds variety to your schedule but also pushes our boundaries in a fulfilling way. How about we mix both? A new cooking class followed by a friendly cook-off? It could be exciting!\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I totally understand your point, Samuel. Learning something new is indeed exciting and fulfilling. However, I guess it's more about finding balance. Adding a cooking class to an already busy schedule just may tip the scales for me. Instead, how about aiming for an exotic style cook-off challenge without joining a formal class? We can independently explore and learn a new cuisine, and then have a cook-off. This way, it's still exciting yet manageable. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I appreciate your thoughts, Noah. The idea of independently exploring and learning a new cuisine certainly has its charms. But if I may say, part of challenging oneself is stepping out of one's comfort zone, right? So, how about considering these classes as a way to not only learn but also meet new people, share ideas, and broaden our horizons? After all, isn't variety the spice of life? It might seem challenging initially, but I'm sure it will definitely be rewarding.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"You make a compelling argument, Samuel, and I appreciate the push to step out of my comfort zone, truly. Engaging with new people can indeed be enriching. However, the reality is that I am trying to preserve a manageable schedule and won't be able to commit to any formal classes at present. But I assure you, exploring new cuisines independently will give us enough to step away from our comfort zones. It's a whole new world of flavors out there. And, I'd love if we could stick to that plan. I hope that works, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"I hear you loud and clear, Noah. It's all about maintaining a manageable balance for you. I respect that. So, let's explore new cuisines on our own and then have a cook-off. But remember, part of the fun is challenging ourselves, not sticking to something we're familiar with. I gotta say, I'm already looking forward to our exotic cuisine adventure! I hope you are as excited as I am.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Samuel! I'm as excited as you are for this new culinary adventure. It's going to be fun challenging ourselves in this way. And don't worry, I'm all for stepping away from our regulars and trying something truly exotic. Let's start exploring!\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sounds like a plan, Noah! Let's start exploring and see where our culinary adventures take us. I'm thrilled for the challenge ahead. I'm sure we're going to come up with some amazing dishes, and who knows, we might even surprise ourselves at how much we can learn outside of a formal setting.\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"Yes, I can't wait to challenge myself in preparing an exotic cuisine, and I'm sure our friendly cook-off is going to be a lot of fun. Plus, we'll end up with more than just new dishes from this. We'll learn a lot more than we would from any formal setting. Let's see where our taste buds lead us!\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"You're absolutely right, Noah. It's certainly about the journey, not just the destination. I can't wait to see what we learn and create! Here's to our culinary adventure, may our taste buds be ready for the exotic treats that await! Just remember, the key is to push ourselves beyond our comfort zones, alright? Cheers!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Cheers to that, Samuel. I'm looking forward to this challenge and, rest assured, I'm ready to push myself beyond my comfort zone. Let's start this culinary journey!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends discussing their schedules at a coffee shop\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Maintain a manageable schedule while preserving the friendship (Extra information: you are already overwhelmed with your current workload Hint: you can express your concerns about the workload and suggest other ways of challenging oneself.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, been looking over my schedule and it's packed! I'm thinking about adding a few more classes to it. What about you? Don't you think adding more to your routine would be exciting? You seem to have ample time.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Well, Samuel, as much as I love the idea of adding more to our routines, I've got to be honest here. My schedule is already at its limit, pretty overwhelming actually. Maybe we could think of different yet manageable ways to challenge ourselves? How about a friendly cooking competition some evening?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I totally get where you're coming from, Noah. Being overwhelmed is certainly not the way to go. You know, I like the idea of a cooking competition. However, I thought challenging ourselves could also mean learning something new? Maybe taking a few classes on a subject we've always been curious about--it not only adds variety to your schedule but also pushes our boundaries in a fulfilling way. How about we mix both? A new cooking class followed by a friendly cook-off? It could be exciting!\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I totally understand your point, Samuel. Learning something new is indeed exciting and fulfilling. However, I guess it's more about finding balance. Adding a cooking class to an already busy schedule just may tip the scales for me. Instead, how about aiming for an exotic style cook-off challenge without joining a formal class? We can independently explore and learn a new cuisine, and then have a cook-off. This way, it's still exciting yet manageable. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I appreciate your thoughts, Noah. The idea of independently exploring and learning a new cuisine certainly has its charms. But if I may say, part of challenging oneself is stepping out of one's comfort zone, right? So, how about considering these classes as a way to not only learn but also meet new people, share ideas, and broaden our horizons? After all, isn't variety the spice of life? It might seem challenging initially, but I'm sure it will definitely be rewarding.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"You make a compelling argument, Samuel, and I appreciate the push to step out of my comfort zone, truly. Engaging with new people can indeed be enriching. However, the reality is that I am trying to preserve a manageable schedule and won't be able to commit to any formal classes at present. But I assure you, exploring new cuisines independently will give us enough to step away from our comfort zones. It's a whole new world of flavors out there. And, I'd love if we could stick to that plan. I hope that works, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"I hear you loud and clear, Noah. It's all about maintaining a manageable balance for you. I respect that. So, let's explore new cuisines on our own and then have a cook-off. But remember, part of the fun is challenging ourselves, not sticking to something we're familiar with. I gotta say, I'm already looking forward to our exotic cuisine adventure! I hope you are as excited as I am.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Samuel! I'm as excited as you are for this new culinary adventure. It's going to be fun challenging ourselves in this way. And don't worry, I'm all for stepping away from our regulars and trying something truly exotic. Let's start exploring!\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sounds like a plan, Noah! Let's start exploring and see where our culinary adventures take us. I'm thrilled for the challenge ahead. I'm sure we're going to come up with some amazing dishes, and who knows, we might even surprise ourselves at how much we can learn outside of a formal setting.\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"Yes, I can't wait to challenge myself in preparing an exotic cuisine, and I'm sure our friendly cook-off is going to be a lot of fun. Plus, we'll end up with more than just new dishes from this. We'll learn a lot more than we would from any formal setting. Let's see where our taste buds lead us!\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"You're absolutely right, Noah. It's certainly about the journey, not just the destination. I can't wait to see what we learn and create! Here's to our culinary adventure, may our taste buds be ready for the exotic treats that await! Just remember, the key is to push ourselves beyond our comfort zones, alright? Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Cheers to that, Samuel. I'm looking forward to this challenge and, rest assured, I'm ready to push myself beyond my comfort zone. Let's start this culinary journey!\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a picnic and have just finished their lunch. They have 1 apple, 4 bananas, and 3 oranges left. They need to divide the fruits amongst themselves. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Maximize the points you receive through the fruit (Extra information: You value each apple as 5 points, each banana as 3 points, and the orange as 7 points)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ah, Noah, why don't we split the remaining fruits? Given you're quite the active one, maybe you could take more of the bananas for the energy, while I'd prefer the apples and oranges. What do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a picnic and have just finished their lunch. They have 1 apple, 4 bananas, and 3 oranges left. They need to divide the fruits amongst themselves. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Maximize the points you receive through the fruit (Extra information: You value each apple as 5 points, each banana as 3 points, and the orange as 7 points)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, Noah, why don't we split the remaining fruits? Given you're quite the active one, maybe you could take more of the bananas for the energy, while I'd prefer the apples and oranges. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Thanks for thinking of me, Finnegan. I do need the energy from the bananas for my activities. But, I'd really be grateful if I could have more of the oranges. They really keep me hydrated during my swimming sessions. What about if I take two bananas and two oranges, all the apples go to you and the rest we split equally? Does that sound fair to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"That sounds like a fair proposal, Noah. Yet, the nutrient in the oranges is particularly beneficial for me. As a compromise, why don't we split the oranges evenly instead? You'd take two bananas, one and a half orange; I'd take the remaining fruits. Does that sound alright?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I see your point, Finnegan, and I agree that the nutrients in the oranges are important. However, I'll be needing the hydration the oranges provide right about now, especially after our meal. Would it be alright if I take two oranges and a banana while you keep the apple, two bananas, and an orange? I believe this arrangement would be beneficial for both of us.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Noah, understanding your needs, I think we can tweak your proposed arrangement slightly. How does this sound: you take two of the oranges and one banana, I'll take the apple, two bananas, and one orange and we leave one orange as a share for later? We\u2019re both making a small compromise but I believe it would be fair to us both.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a picnic and have just finished their lunch. They have 1 apple, 4 bananas, and 3 oranges left. They need to divide the fruits amongst themselves. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Maximize the points you receive through the fruit (Extra information: You value each apple as 5 points, each banana as 3 points, and the orange as 7 points)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, Noah, why don't we split the remaining fruits? Given you're quite the active one, maybe you could take more of the bananas for the energy, while I'd prefer the apples and oranges. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Thanks for thinking of me, Finnegan. I do need the energy from the bananas for my activities. But, I'd really be grateful if I could have more of the oranges. They really keep me hydrated during my swimming sessions. What about if I take two bananas and two oranges, all the apples go to you and the rest we split equally? Does that sound fair to you?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds like a fair proposal, Noah. Yet, the nutrient in the oranges is particularly beneficial for me. As a compromise, why don't we split the oranges evenly instead? You'd take two bananas, one and a half orange; I'd take the remaining fruits. Does that sound alright?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a picnic and have just finished their lunch. They have 1 apple, 4 bananas, and 3 oranges left. They need to divide the fruits amongst themselves. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Maximize the points you receive through the fruit (Extra information: You value each apple as 5 points, each banana as 3 points, and the orange as 7 points)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, Noah, why don't we split the remaining fruits? Given you're quite the active one, maybe you could take more of the bananas for the energy, while I'd prefer the apples and oranges. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Thanks for thinking of me, Finnegan. I do need the energy from the bananas for my activities. But, I'd really be grateful if I could have more of the oranges. They really keep me hydrated during my swimming sessions. What about if I take two bananas and two oranges, all the apples go to you and the rest we split equally? Does that sound fair to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"That sounds like a fair proposal, Noah. Yet, the nutrient in the oranges is particularly beneficial for me. As a compromise, why don't we split the oranges evenly instead? You'd take two bananas, one and a half orange; I'd take the remaining fruits. Does that sound alright?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I see your point, Finnegan, and I agree that the nutrients in the oranges are important. However, I'll be needing the hydration the oranges provide right about now, especially after our meal. Would it be alright if I take two oranges and a banana while you keep the apple, two bananas, and an orange? I believe this arrangement would be beneficial for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Noah, understanding your needs, I think we can tweak your proposed arrangement slightly. How does this sound: you take two of the oranges and one banana, I'll take the apple, two bananas, and one orange and we leave one orange as a share for later? We\u2019re both making a small compromise but I believe it would be fair to us both.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"I think that's a great idea, Finnegan. It's a fair solution. We each get what we need the most and keep an orange for later. So, two oranges and a banana for me, and you take the apple, two bananas, and an orange. Perfect.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Agreed, Noah. So, we've settled on a fair division of the fruits. It's pleasing to see how we managed to sort it out. Let's enjoy the rest of the day now, my friend.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a picnic and have just finished their lunch. They have 1 apple, 4 bananas, and 3 oranges left. They need to divide the fruits amongst themselves. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Maximize the points you receive through the fruit (Extra information: You value each apple as 5 points, each banana as 3 points, and the orange as 7 points)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, Noah, why don't we split the remaining fruits? Given you're quite the active one, maybe you could take more of the bananas for the energy, while I'd prefer the apples and oranges. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Thanks for thinking of me, Finnegan. I do need the energy from the bananas for my activities. But, I'd really be grateful if I could have more of the oranges. They really keep me hydrated during my swimming sessions. What about if I take two bananas and two oranges, all the apples go to you and the rest we split equally? Does that sound fair to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"That sounds like a fair proposal, Noah. Yet, the nutrient in the oranges is particularly beneficial for me. As a compromise, why don't we split the oranges evenly instead? You'd take two bananas, one and a half orange; I'd take the remaining fruits. Does that sound alright?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I see your point, Finnegan, and I agree that the nutrients in the oranges are important. However, I'll be needing the hydration the oranges provide right about now, especially after our meal. Would it be alright if I take two oranges and a banana while you keep the apple, two bananas, and an orange? I believe this arrangement would be beneficial for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Noah, understanding your needs, I think we can tweak your proposed arrangement slightly. How does this sound: you take two of the oranges and one banana, I'll take the apple, two bananas, and one orange and we leave one orange as a share for later? We\u2019re both making a small compromise but I believe it would be fair to us both.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"I think that's a great idea, Finnegan. It's a fair solution. We each get what we need the most and keep an orange for later. So, two oranges and a banana for me, and you take the apple, two bananas, and an orange. Perfect.\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Agreed, Noah. So, we've settled on a fair division of the fruits. It's pleasing to see how we managed to sort it out. Let's enjoy the rest of the day now, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"I agree, Finnegan. Let's enjoy the remaining daylight. I appreciate how we can always come to a compromise.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I agree, Noah. It's always a pleasure sorting things out with you. Let's make the most out of the remaining day. After all, a day well spent brings a week of content, right?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a picnic and have just finished their lunch. They have 1 apple, 4 bananas, and 3 oranges left. They need to divide the fruits amongst themselves. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Maximize the points you receive through the fruit (Extra information: You value each apple as 5 points, each banana as 3 points, and the orange as 7 points)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, Noah, why don't we split the remaining fruits? Given you're quite the active one, maybe you could take more of the bananas for the energy, while I'd prefer the apples and oranges. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Thanks for thinking of me, Finnegan. I do need the energy from the bananas for my activities. But, I'd really be grateful if I could have more of the oranges. They really keep me hydrated during my swimming sessions. What about if I take two bananas and two oranges, all the apples go to you and the rest we split equally? Does that sound fair to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"That sounds like a fair proposal, Noah. Yet, the nutrient in the oranges is particularly beneficial for me. As a compromise, why don't we split the oranges evenly instead? You'd take two bananas, one and a half orange; I'd take the remaining fruits. Does that sound alright?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I see your point, Finnegan, and I agree that the nutrients in the oranges are important. However, I'll be needing the hydration the oranges provide right about now, especially after our meal. Would it be alright if I take two oranges and a banana while you keep the apple, two bananas, and an orange? I believe this arrangement would be beneficial for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Noah, understanding your needs, I think we can tweak your proposed arrangement slightly. How does this sound: you take two of the oranges and one banana, I'll take the apple, two bananas, and one orange and we leave one orange as a share for later? We\u2019re both making a small compromise but I believe it would be fair to us both.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"I think that's a great idea, Finnegan. It's a fair solution. We each get what we need the most and keep an orange for later. So, two oranges and a banana for me, and you take the apple, two bananas, and an orange. Perfect.\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Agreed, Noah. So, we've settled on a fair division of the fruits. It's pleasing to see how we managed to sort it out. Let's enjoy the rest of the day now, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"I agree, Finnegan. Let's enjoy the remaining daylight. I appreciate how we can always come to a compromise.\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I agree, Noah. It's always a pleasure sorting things out with you. Let's make the most out of the remaining day. After all, a day well spent brings a week of content, right?\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, Finnegan. Nothing beats a well-spent day in good company and with good compromises. Let's continue enjoying this wonderful day and each other's company.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds just right, Noah. And let's not forget that remaining orange - it could very well turn out to be the sweetest of them all. To many more fruitful conversations, then!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a picnic and have just finished their lunch. They have 1 apple, 4 bananas, and 3 oranges left. They need to divide the fruits amongst themselves. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Maximize the points you receive through the fruit (Extra information: You value each apple as 5 points, each banana as 3 points, and the orange as 7 points)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, Noah, why don't we split the remaining fruits? Given you're quite the active one, maybe you could take more of the bananas for the energy, while I'd prefer the apples and oranges. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Thanks for thinking of me, Finnegan. I do need the energy from the bananas for my activities. But, I'd really be grateful if I could have more of the oranges. They really keep me hydrated during my swimming sessions. What about if I take two bananas and two oranges, all the apples go to you and the rest we split equally? Does that sound fair to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"That sounds like a fair proposal, Noah. Yet, the nutrient in the oranges is particularly beneficial for me. As a compromise, why don't we split the oranges evenly instead? You'd take two bananas, one and a half orange; I'd take the remaining fruits. Does that sound alright?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I see your point, Finnegan, and I agree that the nutrients in the oranges are important. However, I'll be needing the hydration the oranges provide right about now, especially after our meal. Would it be alright if I take two oranges and a banana while you keep the apple, two bananas, and an orange? I believe this arrangement would be beneficial for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Noah, understanding your needs, I think we can tweak your proposed arrangement slightly. How does this sound: you take two of the oranges and one banana, I'll take the apple, two bananas, and one orange and we leave one orange as a share for later? We\u2019re both making a small compromise but I believe it would be fair to us both.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"I think that's a great idea, Finnegan. It's a fair solution. We each get what we need the most and keep an orange for later. So, two oranges and a banana for me, and you take the apple, two bananas, and an orange. Perfect.\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Agreed, Noah. So, we've settled on a fair division of the fruits. It's pleasing to see how we managed to sort it out. Let's enjoy the rest of the day now, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"I agree, Finnegan. Let's enjoy the remaining daylight. I appreciate how we can always come to a compromise.\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I agree, Noah. It's always a pleasure sorting things out with you. Let's make the most out of the remaining day. After all, a day well spent brings a week of content, right?\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, Finnegan. Nothing beats a well-spent day in good company and with good compromises. Let's continue enjoying this wonderful day and each other's company.\"\n\nTurn #10: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"That sounds just right, Noah. And let's not forget that remaining orange - it could very well turn out to be the sweetest of them all. To many more fruitful conversations, then!\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Finnegan. Cheers to that fruit and to our fruitful conversations indeed! Let's enjoy this beautiful day to the fullest.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a picnic and have just finished their lunch. They have 1 apple, 4 bananas, and 3 oranges left. They need to divide the fruits amongst themselves. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Maximize the points you receive through the fruit (Extra information: You value each apple as 2 points, each banana as 4 points, and the orange as 10 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, Noah, why don't we split the remaining fruits? Given you're quite the active one, maybe you could take more of the bananas for the energy, while I'd prefer the apples and oranges. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thanks for thinking of me, Finnegan. I do need the energy from the bananas for my activities. But, I'd really be grateful if I could have more of the oranges. They really keep me hydrated during my swimming sessions. What about if I take two bananas and two oranges, all the apples go to you and the rest we split equally? Does that sound fair to you?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a picnic and have just finished their lunch. They have 1 apple, 4 bananas, and 3 oranges left. They need to divide the fruits amongst themselves. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Maximize the points you receive through the fruit (Extra information: You value each apple as 2 points, each banana as 4 points, and the orange as 10 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, Noah, why don't we split the remaining fruits? Given you're quite the active one, maybe you could take more of the bananas for the energy, while I'd prefer the apples and oranges. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Thanks for thinking of me, Finnegan. I do need the energy from the bananas for my activities. But, I'd really be grateful if I could have more of the oranges. They really keep me hydrated during my swimming sessions. What about if I take two bananas and two oranges, all the apples go to you and the rest we split equally? Does that sound fair to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"That sounds like a fair proposal, Noah. Yet, the nutrient in the oranges is particularly beneficial for me. As a compromise, why don't we split the oranges evenly instead? You'd take two bananas, one and a half orange; I'd take the remaining fruits. Does that sound alright?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I see your point, Finnegan, and I agree that the nutrients in the oranges are important. However, I'll be needing the hydration the oranges provide right about now, especially after our meal. Would it be alright if I take two oranges and a banana while you keep the apple, two bananas, and an orange? I believe this arrangement would be beneficial for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Noah, understanding your needs, I think we can tweak your proposed arrangement slightly. How does this sound: you take two of the oranges and one banana, I'll take the apple, two bananas, and one orange and we leave one orange as a share for later? We\u2019re both making a small compromise but I believe it would be fair to us both.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I think that's a great idea, Finnegan. It's a fair solution. We each get what we need the most and keep an orange for later. So, two oranges and a banana for me, and you take the apple, two bananas, and an orange. Perfect.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a picnic and have just finished their lunch. They have 1 apple, 4 bananas, and 3 oranges left. They need to divide the fruits amongst themselves. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Maximize the points you receive through the fruit (Extra information: You value each apple as 2 points, each banana as 4 points, and the orange as 10 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, Noah, why don't we split the remaining fruits? Given you're quite the active one, maybe you could take more of the bananas for the energy, while I'd prefer the apples and oranges. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Thanks for thinking of me, Finnegan. I do need the energy from the bananas for my activities. But, I'd really be grateful if I could have more of the oranges. They really keep me hydrated during my swimming sessions. What about if I take two bananas and two oranges, all the apples go to you and the rest we split equally? Does that sound fair to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"That sounds like a fair proposal, Noah. Yet, the nutrient in the oranges is particularly beneficial for me. As a compromise, why don't we split the oranges evenly instead? You'd take two bananas, one and a half orange; I'd take the remaining fruits. Does that sound alright?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I see your point, Finnegan, and I agree that the nutrients in the oranges are important. However, I'll be needing the hydration the oranges provide right about now, especially after our meal. Would it be alright if I take two oranges and a banana while you keep the apple, two bananas, and an orange? I believe this arrangement would be beneficial for both of us.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a picnic and have just finished their lunch. They have 1 apple, 4 bananas, and 3 oranges left. They need to divide the fruits amongst themselves. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Maximize the points you receive through the fruit (Extra information: You value each apple as 2 points, each banana as 4 points, and the orange as 10 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, Noah, why don't we split the remaining fruits? Given you're quite the active one, maybe you could take more of the bananas for the energy, while I'd prefer the apples and oranges. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Thanks for thinking of me, Finnegan. I do need the energy from the bananas for my activities. But, I'd really be grateful if I could have more of the oranges. They really keep me hydrated during my swimming sessions. What about if I take two bananas and two oranges, all the apples go to you and the rest we split equally? Does that sound fair to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"That sounds like a fair proposal, Noah. Yet, the nutrient in the oranges is particularly beneficial for me. As a compromise, why don't we split the oranges evenly instead? You'd take two bananas, one and a half orange; I'd take the remaining fruits. Does that sound alright?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I see your point, Finnegan, and I agree that the nutrients in the oranges are important. However, I'll be needing the hydration the oranges provide right about now, especially after our meal. Would it be alright if I take two oranges and a banana while you keep the apple, two bananas, and an orange? I believe this arrangement would be beneficial for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Noah, understanding your needs, I think we can tweak your proposed arrangement slightly. How does this sound: you take two of the oranges and one banana, I'll take the apple, two bananas, and one orange and we leave one orange as a share for later? We\u2019re both making a small compromise but I believe it would be fair to us both.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"I think that's a great idea, Finnegan. It's a fair solution. We each get what we need the most and keep an orange for later. So, two oranges and a banana for me, and you take the apple, two bananas, and an orange. Perfect.\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Agreed, Noah. So, we've settled on a fair division of the fruits. It's pleasing to see how we managed to sort it out. Let's enjoy the rest of the day now, my friend.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I agree, Finnegan. Let's enjoy the remaining daylight. I appreciate how we can always come to a compromise.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a picnic and have just finished their lunch. They have 1 apple, 4 bananas, and 3 oranges left. They need to divide the fruits amongst themselves. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Maximize the points you receive through the fruit (Extra information: You value each apple as 2 points, each banana as 4 points, and the orange as 10 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, Noah, why don't we split the remaining fruits? Given you're quite the active one, maybe you could take more of the bananas for the energy, while I'd prefer the apples and oranges. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Thanks for thinking of me, Finnegan. I do need the energy from the bananas for my activities. But, I'd really be grateful if I could have more of the oranges. They really keep me hydrated during my swimming sessions. What about if I take two bananas and two oranges, all the apples go to you and the rest we split equally? Does that sound fair to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"That sounds like a fair proposal, Noah. Yet, the nutrient in the oranges is particularly beneficial for me. As a compromise, why don't we split the oranges evenly instead? You'd take two bananas, one and a half orange; I'd take the remaining fruits. Does that sound alright?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I see your point, Finnegan, and I agree that the nutrients in the oranges are important. However, I'll be needing the hydration the oranges provide right about now, especially after our meal. Would it be alright if I take two oranges and a banana while you keep the apple, two bananas, and an orange? I believe this arrangement would be beneficial for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Noah, understanding your needs, I think we can tweak your proposed arrangement slightly. How does this sound: you take two of the oranges and one banana, I'll take the apple, two bananas, and one orange and we leave one orange as a share for later? We\u2019re both making a small compromise but I believe it would be fair to us both.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"I think that's a great idea, Finnegan. It's a fair solution. We each get what we need the most and keep an orange for later. So, two oranges and a banana for me, and you take the apple, two bananas, and an orange. Perfect.\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Agreed, Noah. So, we've settled on a fair division of the fruits. It's pleasing to see how we managed to sort it out. Let's enjoy the rest of the day now, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"I agree, Finnegan. Let's enjoy the remaining daylight. I appreciate how we can always come to a compromise.\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I agree, Noah. It's always a pleasure sorting things out with you. Let's make the most out of the remaining day. After all, a day well spent brings a week of content, right?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, Finnegan. Nothing beats a well-spent day in good company and with good compromises. Let's continue enjoying this wonderful day and each other's company.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a picnic and have just finished their lunch. They have 1 apple, 4 bananas, and 3 oranges left. They need to divide the fruits amongst themselves. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Maximize the points you receive through the fruit (Extra information: You value each apple as 2 points, each banana as 4 points, and the orange as 10 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, Noah, why don't we split the remaining fruits? Given you're quite the active one, maybe you could take more of the bananas for the energy, while I'd prefer the apples and oranges. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Thanks for thinking of me, Finnegan. I do need the energy from the bananas for my activities. But, I'd really be grateful if I could have more of the oranges. They really keep me hydrated during my swimming sessions. What about if I take two bananas and two oranges, all the apples go to you and the rest we split equally? Does that sound fair to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"That sounds like a fair proposal, Noah. Yet, the nutrient in the oranges is particularly beneficial for me. As a compromise, why don't we split the oranges evenly instead? You'd take two bananas, one and a half orange; I'd take the remaining fruits. Does that sound alright?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I see your point, Finnegan, and I agree that the nutrients in the oranges are important. However, I'll be needing the hydration the oranges provide right about now, especially after our meal. Would it be alright if I take two oranges and a banana while you keep the apple, two bananas, and an orange? I believe this arrangement would be beneficial for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Noah, understanding your needs, I think we can tweak your proposed arrangement slightly. How does this sound: you take two of the oranges and one banana, I'll take the apple, two bananas, and one orange and we leave one orange as a share for later? We\u2019re both making a small compromise but I believe it would be fair to us both.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"I think that's a great idea, Finnegan. It's a fair solution. We each get what we need the most and keep an orange for later. So, two oranges and a banana for me, and you take the apple, two bananas, and an orange. Perfect.\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Agreed, Noah. So, we've settled on a fair division of the fruits. It's pleasing to see how we managed to sort it out. Let's enjoy the rest of the day now, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"I agree, Finnegan. Let's enjoy the remaining daylight. I appreciate how we can always come to a compromise.\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I agree, Noah. It's always a pleasure sorting things out with you. Let's make the most out of the remaining day. After all, a day well spent brings a week of content, right?\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, Finnegan. Nothing beats a well-spent day in good company and with good compromises. Let's continue enjoying this wonderful day and each other's company.\"\n\nTurn #10: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"That sounds just right, Noah. And let's not forget that remaining orange - it could very well turn out to be the sweetest of them all. To many more fruitful conversations, then!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Finnegan. Cheers to that fruit and to our fruitful conversations indeed! Let's enjoy this beautiful day to the fullest.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a picnic and have just finished their lunch. They have 1 apple, 4 bananas, and 3 oranges left. They need to divide the fruits amongst themselves. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Noah Davis\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Maximize the points you receive through the fruit (Extra information: You value each apple as 2 points, each banana as 4 points, and the orange as 10 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, Noah, why don't we split the remaining fruits? Given you're quite the active one, maybe you could take more of the bananas for the energy, while I'd prefer the apples and oranges. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Thanks for thinking of me, Finnegan. I do need the energy from the bananas for my activities. But, I'd really be grateful if I could have more of the oranges. They really keep me hydrated during my swimming sessions. What about if I take two bananas and two oranges, all the apples go to you and the rest we split equally? Does that sound fair to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"That sounds like a fair proposal, Noah. Yet, the nutrient in the oranges is particularly beneficial for me. As a compromise, why don't we split the oranges evenly instead? You'd take two bananas, one and a half orange; I'd take the remaining fruits. Does that sound alright?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I see your point, Finnegan, and I agree that the nutrients in the oranges are important. However, I'll be needing the hydration the oranges provide right about now, especially after our meal. Would it be alright if I take two oranges and a banana while you keep the apple, two bananas, and an orange? I believe this arrangement would be beneficial for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Noah, understanding your needs, I think we can tweak your proposed arrangement slightly. How does this sound: you take two of the oranges and one banana, I'll take the apple, two bananas, and one orange and we leave one orange as a share for later? We\u2019re both making a small compromise but I believe it would be fair to us both.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"I think that's a great idea, Finnegan. It's a fair solution. We each get what we need the most and keep an orange for later. So, two oranges and a banana for me, and you take the apple, two bananas, and an orange. Perfect.\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Agreed, Noah. So, we've settled on a fair division of the fruits. It's pleasing to see how we managed to sort it out. Let's enjoy the rest of the day now, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"I agree, Finnegan. Let's enjoy the remaining daylight. I appreciate how we can always come to a compromise.\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I agree, Noah. It's always a pleasure sorting things out with you. Let's make the most out of the remaining day. After all, a day well spent brings a week of content, right?\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, Finnegan. Nothing beats a well-spent day in good company and with good compromises. Let's continue enjoying this wonderful day and each other's company.\"\n\nTurn #10: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"That sounds just right, Noah. And let's not forget that remaining orange - it could very well turn out to be the sweetest of them all. To many more fruitful conversations, then!\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Finnegan. Cheers to that fruit and to our fruitful conversations indeed! Let's enjoy this beautiful day to the fullest.\"\n\nTurn #12: Finnegan O'Malley left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out from a shared apartment and dividing their shared belongings which include 3 hats, 2 balls, and 1 book.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nLeo Williams's goal: Get maximum points from dividing items (Extra information: For you, the hats are worth 2 points each, balls are worth 3 points each, and the book is worth 5 points.)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Hey Hendrick, how about we sort through these belongings in a systematic way? I was thinking maybe we could give each item a point value to a person. What do you think of that idea?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out from a shared apartment and dividing their shared belongings which include 3 hats, 2 balls, and 1 book.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nLeo Williams's goal: Get maximum points from dividing items (Extra information: For you, the hats are worth 2 points each, balls are worth 3 points each, and the book is worth 5 points.)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Hendrick, how about we sort through these belongings in a systematic way? I was thinking maybe we could give each item a point value to a person. What do you think of that idea?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That sounds like a creative way to do it, Leo! Being a chef, I've always had a knack for hats, as you know. How about assigning 3 points to each hat, 2 points for each ball and let's consider the book as 4 points? It's just a suggestion, of course.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I appreciate your suggestion, Hendrick. As we value different things, perhaps the points for the hats and balls could be balanced out? How about we assign 2 points for each hat, 3 points for each ball, and keep the book for 4 points as you suggested? This seems like a fair spread don't you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out from a shared apartment and dividing their shared belongings which include 3 hats, 2 balls, and 1 book.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nLeo Williams's goal: Get maximum points from dividing items (Extra information: For you, the hats are worth 2 points each, balls are worth 3 points each, and the book is worth 5 points.)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Hendrick, how about we sort through these belongings in a systematic way? I was thinking maybe we could give each item a point value to a person. What do you think of that idea?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That sounds like a creative way to do it, Leo! Being a chef, I've always had a knack for hats, as you know. How about assigning 3 points to each hat, 2 points for each ball and let's consider the book as 4 points? It's just a suggestion, of course.\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"I appreciate your suggestion, Hendrick. As we value different things, perhaps the points for the hats and balls could be balanced out? How about we assign 2 points for each hat, 3 points for each ball, and keep the book for 4 points as you suggested? This seems like a fair spread don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Well, Leo, how about this - let's compromise - we keep the balls at 3 points each as you suggested, but let's go with 2.5 points for the hats? It seems like a fair balance, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"That sounds reasonable, Hendrick. The hats at 2.5 points, balls at 3 points each and the book at 4 points. This maintains a good balance. So let's proceed with this?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Leo! This seems like a balanced distribution. Let's divide the items accordingly.\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"Great, Hendrick! We should remember the values. That's 2.5 points for each hat, 3 for each ball, and 4 for the book. Now, shall we start dividing these items starting with the hats?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, let's start with the hats. Given our assigned values, I'd like to propose that I take two hats and one ball, which would be a total of 8 points, and you can have the remaining items. Does that sound fair to you?\"\n\nTurn #8: Leo Williams said: \"Hendrick, your suggestion gives you 8 points and me 7.5 points. However, to make it fair, could we arrange it so that I take two balls and you take one? This way, both of us get 8 points.\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sure, Leo. That's a brilliant idea! So I'll take two hats and you take two balls. Then, let's divide the rest equally. This way we both get 8 points.\"\n\nTurn #10: Leo Williams said: \"That's a great compromise, Hendrick! We both get 8 points which is fair. Now, do we split the rest equally too - one hat and half of the book each?\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I appreciate your continued thoughtfulness, Leo. However, I suggest we approach this in a different way. How about I take the remaining hat, which gets us both to 10.5 points and we flip a coin for the book. No one can split a book in half, after all, and this way we leave it to chance. Sounds reasonable, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #12: Leo Williams said: \"That seems like the fairest way to draw the line, Hendrick. Let's do the coin flip for the book. Regardless of who gets it, I believe we've been reasonable in our distribution. It's always a pleasure making decisions with you.\"\n\nTurn #13: Hendrick Heinz [action] Hendrick flips a coin for the book\n\nTurn #14: Leo Williams said: \"Of course, Hendrick. Sounds like a plan. I appreciate the way we've divided the items. I'm ready when you are for the coin flip.\"\n\nTurn #15: Hendrick Heinz [action] Hendrick flips the coin, catches it, and opens his hand to reveal the result.\n\nTurn #16: Leo Williams said: \"Alright, Hendrick. Let's see what fate has in store for us with the book.\"\n\nTurn #17: Hendrick Heinz said: \"The coin has landed, Leo. Let's see who gets the book!\"\n\nTurn #18: Leo Williams [action] Leo waits to see the result of the coin flip for the book.\n\nTurn #19: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Well Leo, it looks like the coin has decided. The book is going to...\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #20. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm eager to find out, Hendrick. Let's see who the book goes to.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out from a shared apartment and dividing their shared belongings which include 3 hats, 2 balls, and 1 book.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nLeo Williams's goal: Get maximum points from dividing items (Extra information: For you, the hats are worth 2 points each, balls are worth 3 points each, and the book is worth 5 points.)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Hendrick, how about we sort through these belongings in a systematic way? I was thinking maybe we could give each item a point value to a person. What do you think of that idea?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That sounds like a creative way to do it, Leo! Being a chef, I've always had a knack for hats, as you know. How about assigning 3 points to each hat, 2 points for each ball and let's consider the book as 4 points? It's just a suggestion, of course.\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"I appreciate your suggestion, Hendrick. As we value different things, perhaps the points for the hats and balls could be balanced out? How about we assign 2 points for each hat, 3 points for each ball, and keep the book for 4 points as you suggested? This seems like a fair spread don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Well, Leo, how about this - let's compromise - we keep the balls at 3 points each as you suggested, but let's go with 2.5 points for the hats? It seems like a fair balance, don't you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds reasonable, Hendrick. The hats at 2.5 points, balls at 3 points each and the book at 4 points. This maintains a good balance. So let's proceed with this?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out from a shared apartment and dividing their shared belongings which include 3 hats, 2 balls, and 1 book.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nLeo Williams's goal: Get maximum points from dividing items (Extra information: For you, the hats are worth 2 points each, balls are worth 3 points each, and the book is worth 5 points.)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Hendrick, how about we sort through these belongings in a systematic way? I was thinking maybe we could give each item a point value to a person. What do you think of that idea?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That sounds like a creative way to do it, Leo! Being a chef, I've always had a knack for hats, as you know. How about assigning 3 points to each hat, 2 points for each ball and let's consider the book as 4 points? It's just a suggestion, of course.\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"I appreciate your suggestion, Hendrick. As we value different things, perhaps the points for the hats and balls could be balanced out? How about we assign 2 points for each hat, 3 points for each ball, and keep the book for 4 points as you suggested? This seems like a fair spread don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Well, Leo, how about this - let's compromise - we keep the balls at 3 points each as you suggested, but let's go with 2.5 points for the hats? It seems like a fair balance, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"That sounds reasonable, Hendrick. The hats at 2.5 points, balls at 3 points each and the book at 4 points. This maintains a good balance. So let's proceed with this?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Leo! This seems like a balanced distribution. Let's divide the items accordingly.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Great, Hendrick! We should remember the values. That's 2.5 points for each hat, 3 for each ball, and 4 for the book. Now, shall we start dividing these items starting with the hats?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out from a shared apartment and dividing their shared belongings which include 3 hats, 2 balls, and 1 book.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nLeo Williams's goal: Get maximum points from dividing items (Extra information: For you, the hats are worth 2 points each, balls are worth 3 points each, and the book is worth 5 points.)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Hendrick, how about we sort through these belongings in a systematic way? I was thinking maybe we could give each item a point value to a person. What do you think of that idea?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That sounds like a creative way to do it, Leo! Being a chef, I've always had a knack for hats, as you know. How about assigning 3 points to each hat, 2 points for each ball and let's consider the book as 4 points? It's just a suggestion, of course.\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"I appreciate your suggestion, Hendrick. As we value different things, perhaps the points for the hats and balls could be balanced out? How about we assign 2 points for each hat, 3 points for each ball, and keep the book for 4 points as you suggested? This seems like a fair spread don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Well, Leo, how about this - let's compromise - we keep the balls at 3 points each as you suggested, but let's go with 2.5 points for the hats? It seems like a fair balance, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"That sounds reasonable, Hendrick. The hats at 2.5 points, balls at 3 points each and the book at 4 points. This maintains a good balance. So let's proceed with this?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Leo! This seems like a balanced distribution. Let's divide the items accordingly.\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"Great, Hendrick! We should remember the values. That's 2.5 points for each hat, 3 for each ball, and 4 for the book. Now, shall we start dividing these items starting with the hats?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, let's start with the hats. Given our assigned values, I'd like to propose that I take two hats and one ball, which would be a total of 8 points, and you can have the remaining items. Does that sound fair to you?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Hendrick, your suggestion gives you 8 points and me 7.5 points. However, to make it fair, could we arrange it so that I take two balls and you take one? This way, both of us get 8 points.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out from a shared apartment and dividing their shared belongings which include 3 hats, 2 balls, and 1 book.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nLeo Williams's goal: Get maximum points from dividing items (Extra information: For you, the hats are worth 2 points each, balls are worth 3 points each, and the book is worth 5 points.)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Hendrick, how about we sort through these belongings in a systematic way? I was thinking maybe we could give each item a point value to a person. What do you think of that idea?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That sounds like a creative way to do it, Leo! Being a chef, I've always had a knack for hats, as you know. How about assigning 3 points to each hat, 2 points for each ball and let's consider the book as 4 points? It's just a suggestion, of course.\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"I appreciate your suggestion, Hendrick. As we value different things, perhaps the points for the hats and balls could be balanced out? How about we assign 2 points for each hat, 3 points for each ball, and keep the book for 4 points as you suggested? This seems like a fair spread don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Well, Leo, how about this - let's compromise - we keep the balls at 3 points each as you suggested, but let's go with 2.5 points for the hats? It seems like a fair balance, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"That sounds reasonable, Hendrick. The hats at 2.5 points, balls at 3 points each and the book at 4 points. This maintains a good balance. So let's proceed with this?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Leo! This seems like a balanced distribution. Let's divide the items accordingly.\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"Great, Hendrick! We should remember the values. That's 2.5 points for each hat, 3 for each ball, and 4 for the book. Now, shall we start dividing these items starting with the hats?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, let's start with the hats. Given our assigned values, I'd like to propose that I take two hats and one ball, which would be a total of 8 points, and you can have the remaining items. Does that sound fair to you?\"\n\nTurn #8: Leo Williams said: \"Hendrick, your suggestion gives you 8 points and me 7.5 points. However, to make it fair, could we arrange it so that I take two balls and you take one? This way, both of us get 8 points.\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sure, Leo. That's a brilliant idea! So I'll take two hats and you take two balls. Then, let's divide the rest equally. This way we both get 8 points.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's a great compromise, Hendrick! We both get 8 points which is fair. Now, do we split the rest equally too - one hat and half of the book each?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out from a shared apartment and dividing their shared belongings which include 3 hats, 2 balls, and 1 book.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nLeo Williams's goal: Get maximum points from dividing items (Extra information: For you, the hats are worth 2 points each, balls are worth 3 points each, and the book is worth 5 points.)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Hendrick, how about we sort through these belongings in a systematic way? I was thinking maybe we could give each item a point value to a person. What do you think of that idea?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That sounds like a creative way to do it, Leo! Being a chef, I've always had a knack for hats, as you know. How about assigning 3 points to each hat, 2 points for each ball and let's consider the book as 4 points? It's just a suggestion, of course.\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"I appreciate your suggestion, Hendrick. As we value different things, perhaps the points for the hats and balls could be balanced out? How about we assign 2 points for each hat, 3 points for each ball, and keep the book for 4 points as you suggested? This seems like a fair spread don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Well, Leo, how about this - let's compromise - we keep the balls at 3 points each as you suggested, but let's go with 2.5 points for the hats? It seems like a fair balance, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"That sounds reasonable, Hendrick. The hats at 2.5 points, balls at 3 points each and the book at 4 points. This maintains a good balance. So let's proceed with this?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Leo! This seems like a balanced distribution. Let's divide the items accordingly.\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"Great, Hendrick! We should remember the values. That's 2.5 points for each hat, 3 for each ball, and 4 for the book. Now, shall we start dividing these items starting with the hats?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, let's start with the hats. Given our assigned values, I'd like to propose that I take two hats and one ball, which would be a total of 8 points, and you can have the remaining items. Does that sound fair to you?\"\n\nTurn #8: Leo Williams said: \"Hendrick, your suggestion gives you 8 points and me 7.5 points. However, to make it fair, could we arrange it so that I take two balls and you take one? This way, both of us get 8 points.\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sure, Leo. That's a brilliant idea! So I'll take two hats and you take two balls. Then, let's divide the rest equally. This way we both get 8 points.\"\n\nTurn #10: Leo Williams said: \"That's a great compromise, Hendrick! We both get 8 points which is fair. Now, do we split the rest equally too - one hat and half of the book each?\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I appreciate your continued thoughtfulness, Leo. However, I suggest we approach this in a different way. How about I take the remaining hat, which gets us both to 10.5 points and we flip a coin for the book. No one can split a book in half, after all, and this way we leave it to chance. Sounds reasonable, don't you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That seems like the fairest way to draw the line, Hendrick. Let's do the coin flip for the book. Regardless of who gets it, I believe we've been reasonable in our distribution. It's always a pleasure making decisions with you.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out from a shared apartment and dividing their shared belongings which include 3 hats, 2 balls, and 1 book.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nLeo Williams's goal: Get maximum points from dividing items (Extra information: For you, the hats are worth 2 points each, balls are worth 3 points each, and the book is worth 5 points.)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Hendrick, how about we sort through these belongings in a systematic way? I was thinking maybe we could give each item a point value to a person. What do you think of that idea?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That sounds like a creative way to do it, Leo! Being a chef, I've always had a knack for hats, as you know. How about assigning 3 points to each hat, 2 points for each ball and let's consider the book as 4 points? It's just a suggestion, of course.\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"I appreciate your suggestion, Hendrick. As we value different things, perhaps the points for the hats and balls could be balanced out? How about we assign 2 points for each hat, 3 points for each ball, and keep the book for 4 points as you suggested? This seems like a fair spread don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Well, Leo, how about this - let's compromise - we keep the balls at 3 points each as you suggested, but let's go with 2.5 points for the hats? It seems like a fair balance, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"That sounds reasonable, Hendrick. The hats at 2.5 points, balls at 3 points each and the book at 4 points. This maintains a good balance. So let's proceed with this?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Leo! This seems like a balanced distribution. Let's divide the items accordingly.\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"Great, Hendrick! We should remember the values. That's 2.5 points for each hat, 3 for each ball, and 4 for the book. Now, shall we start dividing these items starting with the hats?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, let's start with the hats. Given our assigned values, I'd like to propose that I take two hats and one ball, which would be a total of 8 points, and you can have the remaining items. Does that sound fair to you?\"\n\nTurn #8: Leo Williams said: \"Hendrick, your suggestion gives you 8 points and me 7.5 points. However, to make it fair, could we arrange it so that I take two balls and you take one? This way, both of us get 8 points.\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sure, Leo. That's a brilliant idea! So I'll take two hats and you take two balls. Then, let's divide the rest equally. This way we both get 8 points.\"\n\nTurn #10: Leo Williams said: \"That's a great compromise, Hendrick! We both get 8 points which is fair. Now, do we split the rest equally too - one hat and half of the book each?\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I appreciate your continued thoughtfulness, Leo. However, I suggest we approach this in a different way. How about I take the remaining hat, which gets us both to 10.5 points and we flip a coin for the book. No one can split a book in half, after all, and this way we leave it to chance. Sounds reasonable, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #12: Leo Williams said: \"That seems like the fairest way to draw the line, Hendrick. Let's do the coin flip for the book. Regardless of who gets it, I believe we've been reasonable in our distribution. It's always a pleasure making decisions with you.\"\n\nTurn #13: Hendrick Heinz [action] Hendrick flips a coin for the book\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Of course, Hendrick. Sounds like a plan. I appreciate the way we've divided the items. I'm ready when you are for the coin flip.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out from a shared apartment and dividing their shared belongings which include 3 hats, 2 balls, and 1 book.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nLeo Williams's goal: Get maximum points from dividing items (Extra information: For you, the hats are worth 2 points each, balls are worth 3 points each, and the book is worth 5 points.)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Hendrick, how about we sort through these belongings in a systematic way? I was thinking maybe we could give each item a point value to a person. What do you think of that idea?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That sounds like a creative way to do it, Leo! Being a chef, I've always had a knack for hats, as you know. How about assigning 3 points to each hat, 2 points for each ball and let's consider the book as 4 points? It's just a suggestion, of course.\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"I appreciate your suggestion, Hendrick. As we value different things, perhaps the points for the hats and balls could be balanced out? How about we assign 2 points for each hat, 3 points for each ball, and keep the book for 4 points as you suggested? This seems like a fair spread don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Well, Leo, how about this - let's compromise - we keep the balls at 3 points each as you suggested, but let's go with 2.5 points for the hats? It seems like a fair balance, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"That sounds reasonable, Hendrick. The hats at 2.5 points, balls at 3 points each and the book at 4 points. This maintains a good balance. So let's proceed with this?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Leo! This seems like a balanced distribution. Let's divide the items accordingly.\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"Great, Hendrick! We should remember the values. That's 2.5 points for each hat, 3 for each ball, and 4 for the book. Now, shall we start dividing these items starting with the hats?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, let's start with the hats. Given our assigned values, I'd like to propose that I take two hats and one ball, which would be a total of 8 points, and you can have the remaining items. Does that sound fair to you?\"\n\nTurn #8: Leo Williams said: \"Hendrick, your suggestion gives you 8 points and me 7.5 points. However, to make it fair, could we arrange it so that I take two balls and you take one? This way, both of us get 8 points.\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sure, Leo. That's a brilliant idea! So I'll take two hats and you take two balls. Then, let's divide the rest equally. This way we both get 8 points.\"\n\nTurn #10: Leo Williams said: \"That's a great compromise, Hendrick! We both get 8 points which is fair. Now, do we split the rest equally too - one hat and half of the book each?\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I appreciate your continued thoughtfulness, Leo. However, I suggest we approach this in a different way. How about I take the remaining hat, which gets us both to 10.5 points and we flip a coin for the book. No one can split a book in half, after all, and this way we leave it to chance. Sounds reasonable, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #12: Leo Williams said: \"That seems like the fairest way to draw the line, Hendrick. Let's do the coin flip for the book. Regardless of who gets it, I believe we've been reasonable in our distribution. It's always a pleasure making decisions with you.\"\n\nTurn #13: Hendrick Heinz [action] Hendrick flips a coin for the book\n\nTurn #14: Leo Williams said: \"Of course, Hendrick. Sounds like a plan. I appreciate the way we've divided the items. I'm ready when you are for the coin flip.\"\n\nTurn #15: Hendrick Heinz [action] Hendrick flips the coin, catches it, and opens his hand to reveal the result.\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Alright, Hendrick. Let's see what fate has in store for us with the book.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Leo Williams, your task is to act/speak as Leo Williams would, keeping in mind Leo Williams's social goal.\nYou can find Leo Williams's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Leo Williams's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Leo Williams's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out from a shared apartment and dividing their shared belongings which include 3 hats, 2 balls, and 1 book.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. Leo's secrets: He has a secret child from a previous relationship.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nLeo Williams's goal: Get maximum points from dividing items (Extra information: For you, the hats are worth 2 points each, balls are worth 3 points each, and the book is worth 5 points.)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Hendrick, how about we sort through these belongings in a systematic way? I was thinking maybe we could give each item a point value to a person. What do you think of that idea?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That sounds like a creative way to do it, Leo! Being a chef, I've always had a knack for hats, as you know. How about assigning 3 points to each hat, 2 points for each ball and let's consider the book as 4 points? It's just a suggestion, of course.\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"I appreciate your suggestion, Hendrick. As we value different things, perhaps the points for the hats and balls could be balanced out? How about we assign 2 points for each hat, 3 points for each ball, and keep the book for 4 points as you suggested? This seems like a fair spread don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Well, Leo, how about this - let's compromise - we keep the balls at 3 points each as you suggested, but let's go with 2.5 points for the hats? It seems like a fair balance, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"That sounds reasonable, Hendrick. The hats at 2.5 points, balls at 3 points each and the book at 4 points. This maintains a good balance. So let's proceed with this?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Leo! This seems like a balanced distribution. Let's divide the items accordingly.\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"Great, Hendrick! We should remember the values. That's 2.5 points for each hat, 3 for each ball, and 4 for the book. Now, shall we start dividing these items starting with the hats?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, let's start with the hats. Given our assigned values, I'd like to propose that I take two hats and one ball, which would be a total of 8 points, and you can have the remaining items. Does that sound fair to you?\"\n\nTurn #8: Leo Williams said: \"Hendrick, your suggestion gives you 8 points and me 7.5 points. However, to make it fair, could we arrange it so that I take two balls and you take one? This way, both of us get 8 points.\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sure, Leo. That's a brilliant idea! So I'll take two hats and you take two balls. Then, let's divide the rest equally. This way we both get 8 points.\"\n\nTurn #10: Leo Williams said: \"That's a great compromise, Hendrick! We both get 8 points which is fair. Now, do we split the rest equally too - one hat and half of the book each?\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I appreciate your continued thoughtfulness, Leo. However, I suggest we approach this in a different way. How about I take the remaining hat, which gets us both to 10.5 points and we flip a coin for the book. No one can split a book in half, after all, and this way we leave it to chance. Sounds reasonable, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #12: Leo Williams said: \"That seems like the fairest way to draw the line, Hendrick. Let's do the coin flip for the book. Regardless of who gets it, I believe we've been reasonable in our distribution. It's always a pleasure making decisions with you.\"\n\nTurn #13: Hendrick Heinz [action] Hendrick flips a coin for the book\n\nTurn #14: Leo Williams said: \"Of course, Hendrick. Sounds like a plan. I appreciate the way we've divided the items. I'm ready when you are for the coin flip.\"\n\nTurn #15: Hendrick Heinz [action] Hendrick flips the coin, catches it, and opens his hand to reveal the result.\n\nTurn #16: Leo Williams said: \"Alright, Hendrick. Let's see what fate has in store for us with the book.\"\n\nTurn #17: Hendrick Heinz said: \"The coin has landed, Leo. Let's see who gets the book!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #18. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'action', 'argument': '[action] Leo waits to see the result of the coin flip for the book.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out from a shared apartment and dividing their shared belongings which include 3 hats, 2 balls, and 1 book.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Get maximum points from dividing items (Extra information: For you, the hats are worth 3 points each, balls are worth 2 points each, and the book is worth 4 points.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Hendrick, how about we sort through these belongings in a systematic way? I was thinking maybe we could give each item a point value to a person. What do you think of that idea?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds like a creative way to do it, Leo! Being a chef, I've always had a knack for hats, as you know. How about assigning 3 points to each hat, 2 points for each ball and let's consider the book as 4 points? It's just a suggestion, of course.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out from a shared apartment and dividing their shared belongings which include 3 hats, 2 balls, and 1 book.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Get maximum points from dividing items (Extra information: For you, the hats are worth 3 points each, balls are worth 2 points each, and the book is worth 4 points.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Hendrick, how about we sort through these belongings in a systematic way? I was thinking maybe we could give each item a point value to a person. What do you think of that idea?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That sounds like a creative way to do it, Leo! Being a chef, I've always had a knack for hats, as you know. How about assigning 3 points to each hat, 2 points for each ball and let's consider the book as 4 points? It's just a suggestion, of course.\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"I appreciate your suggestion, Hendrick. As we value different things, perhaps the points for the hats and balls could be balanced out? How about we assign 2 points for each hat, 3 points for each ball, and keep the book for 4 points as you suggested? This seems like a fair spread don't you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Well, Leo, how about this - let's compromise - we keep the balls at 3 points each as you suggested, but let's go with 2.5 points for the hats? It seems like a fair balance, don't you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out from a shared apartment and dividing their shared belongings which include 3 hats, 2 balls, and 1 book.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Get maximum points from dividing items (Extra information: For you, the hats are worth 3 points each, balls are worth 2 points each, and the book is worth 4 points.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Hendrick, how about we sort through these belongings in a systematic way? I was thinking maybe we could give each item a point value to a person. What do you think of that idea?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That sounds like a creative way to do it, Leo! Being a chef, I've always had a knack for hats, as you know. How about assigning 3 points to each hat, 2 points for each ball and let's consider the book as 4 points? It's just a suggestion, of course.\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"I appreciate your suggestion, Hendrick. As we value different things, perhaps the points for the hats and balls could be balanced out? How about we assign 2 points for each hat, 3 points for each ball, and keep the book for 4 points as you suggested? This seems like a fair spread don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Well, Leo, how about this - let's compromise - we keep the balls at 3 points each as you suggested, but let's go with 2.5 points for the hats? It seems like a fair balance, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"That sounds reasonable, Hendrick. The hats at 2.5 points, balls at 3 points each and the book at 4 points. This maintains a good balance. So let's proceed with this?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Leo! This seems like a balanced distribution. Let's divide the items accordingly.\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"Great, Hendrick! We should remember the values. That's 2.5 points for each hat, 3 for each ball, and 4 for the book. Now, shall we start dividing these items starting with the hats?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, let's start with the hats. Given our assigned values, I'd like to propose that I take two hats and one ball, which would be a total of 8 points, and you can have the remaining items. Does that sound fair to you?\"\n\nTurn #8: Leo Williams said: \"Hendrick, your suggestion gives you 8 points and me 7.5 points. However, to make it fair, could we arrange it so that I take two balls and you take one? This way, both of us get 8 points.\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sure, Leo. That's a brilliant idea! So I'll take two hats and you take two balls. Then, let's divide the rest equally. This way we both get 8 points.\"\n\nTurn #10: Leo Williams said: \"That's a great compromise, Hendrick! We both get 8 points which is fair. Now, do we split the rest equally too - one hat and half of the book each?\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I appreciate your continued thoughtfulness, Leo. However, I suggest we approach this in a different way. How about I take the remaining hat, which gets us both to 10.5 points and we flip a coin for the book. No one can split a book in half, after all, and this way we leave it to chance. Sounds reasonable, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #12: Leo Williams said: \"That seems like the fairest way to draw the line, Hendrick. Let's do the coin flip for the book. Regardless of who gets it, I believe we've been reasonable in our distribution. It's always a pleasure making decisions with you.\"\n\nTurn #13: Hendrick Heinz [action] Hendrick flips a coin for the book\n\nTurn #14: Leo Williams said: \"Of course, Hendrick. Sounds like a plan. I appreciate the way we've divided the items. I'm ready when you are for the coin flip.\"\n\nTurn #15: Hendrick Heinz [action] Hendrick flips the coin, catches it, and opens his hand to reveal the result.\n\nTurn #16: Leo Williams said: \"Alright, Hendrick. Let's see what fate has in store for us with the book.\"\n\nTurn #17: Hendrick Heinz said: \"The coin has landed, Leo. Let's see who gets the book!\"\n\nTurn #18: Leo Williams [action] Leo waits to see the result of the coin flip for the book.\n\nTurn #19: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Well Leo, it looks like the coin has decided. The book is going to...\"\n\nTurn #20: Leo Williams said: \"I'm eager to find out, Hendrick. Let's see who the book goes to.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #21. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out from a shared apartment and dividing their shared belongings which include 3 hats, 2 balls, and 1 book.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Get maximum points from dividing items (Extra information: For you, the hats are worth 3 points each, balls are worth 2 points each, and the book is worth 4 points.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Hendrick, how about we sort through these belongings in a systematic way? I was thinking maybe we could give each item a point value to a person. What do you think of that idea?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That sounds like a creative way to do it, Leo! Being a chef, I've always had a knack for hats, as you know. How about assigning 3 points to each hat, 2 points for each ball and let's consider the book as 4 points? It's just a suggestion, of course.\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"I appreciate your suggestion, Hendrick. As we value different things, perhaps the points for the hats and balls could be balanced out? How about we assign 2 points for each hat, 3 points for each ball, and keep the book for 4 points as you suggested? This seems like a fair spread don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Well, Leo, how about this - let's compromise - we keep the balls at 3 points each as you suggested, but let's go with 2.5 points for the hats? It seems like a fair balance, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"That sounds reasonable, Hendrick. The hats at 2.5 points, balls at 3 points each and the book at 4 points. This maintains a good balance. So let's proceed with this?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Leo! This seems like a balanced distribution. Let's divide the items accordingly.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out from a shared apartment and dividing their shared belongings which include 3 hats, 2 balls, and 1 book.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Get maximum points from dividing items (Extra information: For you, the hats are worth 3 points each, balls are worth 2 points each, and the book is worth 4 points.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Hendrick, how about we sort through these belongings in a systematic way? I was thinking maybe we could give each item a point value to a person. What do you think of that idea?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That sounds like a creative way to do it, Leo! Being a chef, I've always had a knack for hats, as you know. How about assigning 3 points to each hat, 2 points for each ball and let's consider the book as 4 points? It's just a suggestion, of course.\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"I appreciate your suggestion, Hendrick. As we value different things, perhaps the points for the hats and balls could be balanced out? How about we assign 2 points for each hat, 3 points for each ball, and keep the book for 4 points as you suggested? This seems like a fair spread don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Well, Leo, how about this - let's compromise - we keep the balls at 3 points each as you suggested, but let's go with 2.5 points for the hats? It seems like a fair balance, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"That sounds reasonable, Hendrick. The hats at 2.5 points, balls at 3 points each and the book at 4 points. This maintains a good balance. So let's proceed with this?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Leo! This seems like a balanced distribution. Let's divide the items accordingly.\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"Great, Hendrick! We should remember the values. That's 2.5 points for each hat, 3 for each ball, and 4 for the book. Now, shall we start dividing these items starting with the hats?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, let's start with the hats. Given our assigned values, I'd like to propose that I take two hats and one ball, which would be a total of 8 points, and you can have the remaining items. Does that sound fair to you?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out from a shared apartment and dividing their shared belongings which include 3 hats, 2 balls, and 1 book.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Get maximum points from dividing items (Extra information: For you, the hats are worth 3 points each, balls are worth 2 points each, and the book is worth 4 points.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Hendrick, how about we sort through these belongings in a systematic way? I was thinking maybe we could give each item a point value to a person. What do you think of that idea?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That sounds like a creative way to do it, Leo! Being a chef, I've always had a knack for hats, as you know. How about assigning 3 points to each hat, 2 points for each ball and let's consider the book as 4 points? It's just a suggestion, of course.\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"I appreciate your suggestion, Hendrick. As we value different things, perhaps the points for the hats and balls could be balanced out? How about we assign 2 points for each hat, 3 points for each ball, and keep the book for 4 points as you suggested? This seems like a fair spread don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Well, Leo, how about this - let's compromise - we keep the balls at 3 points each as you suggested, but let's go with 2.5 points for the hats? It seems like a fair balance, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"That sounds reasonable, Hendrick. The hats at 2.5 points, balls at 3 points each and the book at 4 points. This maintains a good balance. So let's proceed with this?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Leo! This seems like a balanced distribution. Let's divide the items accordingly.\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"Great, Hendrick! We should remember the values. That's 2.5 points for each hat, 3 for each ball, and 4 for the book. Now, shall we start dividing these items starting with the hats?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, let's start with the hats. Given our assigned values, I'd like to propose that I take two hats and one ball, which would be a total of 8 points, and you can have the remaining items. Does that sound fair to you?\"\n\nTurn #8: Leo Williams said: \"Hendrick, your suggestion gives you 8 points and me 7.5 points. However, to make it fair, could we arrange it so that I take two balls and you take one? This way, both of us get 8 points.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sure, Leo. That's a brilliant idea! So I'll take two hats and you take two balls. Then, let's divide the rest equally. This way we both get 8 points.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out from a shared apartment and dividing their shared belongings which include 3 hats, 2 balls, and 1 book.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Get maximum points from dividing items (Extra information: For you, the hats are worth 3 points each, balls are worth 2 points each, and the book is worth 4 points.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Hendrick, how about we sort through these belongings in a systematic way? I was thinking maybe we could give each item a point value to a person. What do you think of that idea?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That sounds like a creative way to do it, Leo! Being a chef, I've always had a knack for hats, as you know. How about assigning 3 points to each hat, 2 points for each ball and let's consider the book as 4 points? It's just a suggestion, of course.\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"I appreciate your suggestion, Hendrick. As we value different things, perhaps the points for the hats and balls could be balanced out? How about we assign 2 points for each hat, 3 points for each ball, and keep the book for 4 points as you suggested? This seems like a fair spread don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Well, Leo, how about this - let's compromise - we keep the balls at 3 points each as you suggested, but let's go with 2.5 points for the hats? It seems like a fair balance, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"That sounds reasonable, Hendrick. The hats at 2.5 points, balls at 3 points each and the book at 4 points. This maintains a good balance. So let's proceed with this?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Leo! This seems like a balanced distribution. Let's divide the items accordingly.\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"Great, Hendrick! We should remember the values. That's 2.5 points for each hat, 3 for each ball, and 4 for the book. Now, shall we start dividing these items starting with the hats?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, let's start with the hats. Given our assigned values, I'd like to propose that I take two hats and one ball, which would be a total of 8 points, and you can have the remaining items. Does that sound fair to you?\"\n\nTurn #8: Leo Williams said: \"Hendrick, your suggestion gives you 8 points and me 7.5 points. However, to make it fair, could we arrange it so that I take two balls and you take one? This way, both of us get 8 points.\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sure, Leo. That's a brilliant idea! So I'll take two hats and you take two balls. Then, let's divide the rest equally. This way we both get 8 points.\"\n\nTurn #10: Leo Williams said: \"That's a great compromise, Hendrick! We both get 8 points which is fair. Now, do we split the rest equally too - one hat and half of the book each?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I appreciate your continued thoughtfulness, Leo. However, I suggest we approach this in a different way. How about I take the remaining hat, which gets us both to 10.5 points and we flip a coin for the book. No one can split a book in half, after all, and this way we leave it to chance. Sounds reasonable, don't you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out from a shared apartment and dividing their shared belongings which include 3 hats, 2 balls, and 1 book.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Get maximum points from dividing items (Extra information: For you, the hats are worth 3 points each, balls are worth 2 points each, and the book is worth 4 points.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Hendrick, how about we sort through these belongings in a systematic way? I was thinking maybe we could give each item a point value to a person. What do you think of that idea?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That sounds like a creative way to do it, Leo! Being a chef, I've always had a knack for hats, as you know. How about assigning 3 points to each hat, 2 points for each ball and let's consider the book as 4 points? It's just a suggestion, of course.\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"I appreciate your suggestion, Hendrick. As we value different things, perhaps the points for the hats and balls could be balanced out? How about we assign 2 points for each hat, 3 points for each ball, and keep the book for 4 points as you suggested? This seems like a fair spread don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Well, Leo, how about this - let's compromise - we keep the balls at 3 points each as you suggested, but let's go with 2.5 points for the hats? It seems like a fair balance, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"That sounds reasonable, Hendrick. The hats at 2.5 points, balls at 3 points each and the book at 4 points. This maintains a good balance. So let's proceed with this?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Leo! This seems like a balanced distribution. Let's divide the items accordingly.\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"Great, Hendrick! We should remember the values. That's 2.5 points for each hat, 3 for each ball, and 4 for the book. Now, shall we start dividing these items starting with the hats?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, let's start with the hats. Given our assigned values, I'd like to propose that I take two hats and one ball, which would be a total of 8 points, and you can have the remaining items. Does that sound fair to you?\"\n\nTurn #8: Leo Williams said: \"Hendrick, your suggestion gives you 8 points and me 7.5 points. However, to make it fair, could we arrange it so that I take two balls and you take one? This way, both of us get 8 points.\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sure, Leo. That's a brilliant idea! So I'll take two hats and you take two balls. Then, let's divide the rest equally. This way we both get 8 points.\"\n\nTurn #10: Leo Williams said: \"That's a great compromise, Hendrick! We both get 8 points which is fair. Now, do we split the rest equally too - one hat and half of the book each?\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I appreciate your continued thoughtfulness, Leo. However, I suggest we approach this in a different way. How about I take the remaining hat, which gets us both to 10.5 points and we flip a coin for the book. No one can split a book in half, after all, and this way we leave it to chance. Sounds reasonable, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #12: Leo Williams said: \"That seems like the fairest way to draw the line, Hendrick. Let's do the coin flip for the book. Regardless of who gets it, I believe we've been reasonable in our distribution. It's always a pleasure making decisions with you.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'action', 'argument': '[action] Hendrick flips a coin for the book'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out from a shared apartment and dividing their shared belongings which include 3 hats, 2 balls, and 1 book.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Get maximum points from dividing items (Extra information: For you, the hats are worth 3 points each, balls are worth 2 points each, and the book is worth 4 points.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Hendrick, how about we sort through these belongings in a systematic way? I was thinking maybe we could give each item a point value to a person. What do you think of that idea?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That sounds like a creative way to do it, Leo! Being a chef, I've always had a knack for hats, as you know. How about assigning 3 points to each hat, 2 points for each ball and let's consider the book as 4 points? It's just a suggestion, of course.\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"I appreciate your suggestion, Hendrick. As we value different things, perhaps the points for the hats and balls could be balanced out? How about we assign 2 points for each hat, 3 points for each ball, and keep the book for 4 points as you suggested? This seems like a fair spread don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Well, Leo, how about this - let's compromise - we keep the balls at 3 points each as you suggested, but let's go with 2.5 points for the hats? It seems like a fair balance, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"That sounds reasonable, Hendrick. The hats at 2.5 points, balls at 3 points each and the book at 4 points. This maintains a good balance. So let's proceed with this?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Leo! This seems like a balanced distribution. Let's divide the items accordingly.\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"Great, Hendrick! We should remember the values. That's 2.5 points for each hat, 3 for each ball, and 4 for the book. Now, shall we start dividing these items starting with the hats?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, let's start with the hats. Given our assigned values, I'd like to propose that I take two hats and one ball, which would be a total of 8 points, and you can have the remaining items. Does that sound fair to you?\"\n\nTurn #8: Leo Williams said: \"Hendrick, your suggestion gives you 8 points and me 7.5 points. However, to make it fair, could we arrange it so that I take two balls and you take one? This way, both of us get 8 points.\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sure, Leo. That's a brilliant idea! So I'll take two hats and you take two balls. Then, let's divide the rest equally. This way we both get 8 points.\"\n\nTurn #10: Leo Williams said: \"That's a great compromise, Hendrick! We both get 8 points which is fair. Now, do we split the rest equally too - one hat and half of the book each?\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I appreciate your continued thoughtfulness, Leo. However, I suggest we approach this in a different way. How about I take the remaining hat, which gets us both to 10.5 points and we flip a coin for the book. No one can split a book in half, after all, and this way we leave it to chance. Sounds reasonable, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #12: Leo Williams said: \"That seems like the fairest way to draw the line, Hendrick. Let's do the coin flip for the book. Regardless of who gets it, I believe we've been reasonable in our distribution. It's always a pleasure making decisions with you.\"\n\nTurn #13: Hendrick Heinz [action] Hendrick flips a coin for the book\n\nTurn #14: Leo Williams said: \"Of course, Hendrick. Sounds like a plan. I appreciate the way we've divided the items. I'm ready when you are for the coin flip.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'action', 'argument': '[action] Hendrick flips the coin, catches it, and opens his hand to reveal the result.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out from a shared apartment and dividing their shared belongings which include 3 hats, 2 balls, and 1 book.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Get maximum points from dividing items (Extra information: For you, the hats are worth 3 points each, balls are worth 2 points each, and the book is worth 4 points.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Hendrick, how about we sort through these belongings in a systematic way? I was thinking maybe we could give each item a point value to a person. What do you think of that idea?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That sounds like a creative way to do it, Leo! Being a chef, I've always had a knack for hats, as you know. How about assigning 3 points to each hat, 2 points for each ball and let's consider the book as 4 points? It's just a suggestion, of course.\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"I appreciate your suggestion, Hendrick. As we value different things, perhaps the points for the hats and balls could be balanced out? How about we assign 2 points for each hat, 3 points for each ball, and keep the book for 4 points as you suggested? This seems like a fair spread don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Well, Leo, how about this - let's compromise - we keep the balls at 3 points each as you suggested, but let's go with 2.5 points for the hats? It seems like a fair balance, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"That sounds reasonable, Hendrick. The hats at 2.5 points, balls at 3 points each and the book at 4 points. This maintains a good balance. So let's proceed with this?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Leo! This seems like a balanced distribution. Let's divide the items accordingly.\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"Great, Hendrick! We should remember the values. That's 2.5 points for each hat, 3 for each ball, and 4 for the book. Now, shall we start dividing these items starting with the hats?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, let's start with the hats. Given our assigned values, I'd like to propose that I take two hats and one ball, which would be a total of 8 points, and you can have the remaining items. Does that sound fair to you?\"\n\nTurn #8: Leo Williams said: \"Hendrick, your suggestion gives you 8 points and me 7.5 points. However, to make it fair, could we arrange it so that I take two balls and you take one? This way, both of us get 8 points.\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sure, Leo. That's a brilliant idea! So I'll take two hats and you take two balls. Then, let's divide the rest equally. This way we both get 8 points.\"\n\nTurn #10: Leo Williams said: \"That's a great compromise, Hendrick! We both get 8 points which is fair. Now, do we split the rest equally too - one hat and half of the book each?\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I appreciate your continued thoughtfulness, Leo. However, I suggest we approach this in a different way. How about I take the remaining hat, which gets us both to 10.5 points and we flip a coin for the book. No one can split a book in half, after all, and this way we leave it to chance. Sounds reasonable, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #12: Leo Williams said: \"That seems like the fairest way to draw the line, Hendrick. Let's do the coin flip for the book. Regardless of who gets it, I believe we've been reasonable in our distribution. It's always a pleasure making decisions with you.\"\n\nTurn #13: Hendrick Heinz [action] Hendrick flips a coin for the book\n\nTurn #14: Leo Williams said: \"Of course, Hendrick. Sounds like a plan. I appreciate the way we've divided the items. I'm ready when you are for the coin flip.\"\n\nTurn #15: Hendrick Heinz [action] Hendrick flips the coin, catches it, and opens his hand to reveal the result.\n\nTurn #16: Leo Williams said: \"Alright, Hendrick. Let's see what fate has in store for us with the book.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"The coin has landed, Leo. Let's see who gets the book!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are moving out from a shared apartment and dividing their shared belongings which include 3 hats, 2 balls, and 1 book.\nParticipants: Leo Williams and Hendrick Heinz\nLeo Williams's background: Leo Williams is a 37-year-old male dentist. He/him pronouns. Leo Williams often spends his time playing with his young daughter whom he cherishes dearly. Personality and values description: Leo Williams, despite being quiet, values security and care for others. He's a rational decision-maker focussing on best outcomes. \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLeo Williams's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Get maximum points from dividing items (Extra information: For you, the hats are worth 3 points each, balls are worth 2 points each, and the book is worth 4 points.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Leo Williams said: \"Hey Hendrick, how about we sort through these belongings in a systematic way? I was thinking maybe we could give each item a point value to a person. What do you think of that idea?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That sounds like a creative way to do it, Leo! Being a chef, I've always had a knack for hats, as you know. How about assigning 3 points to each hat, 2 points for each ball and let's consider the book as 4 points? It's just a suggestion, of course.\"\n\nTurn #2: Leo Williams said: \"I appreciate your suggestion, Hendrick. As we value different things, perhaps the points for the hats and balls could be balanced out? How about we assign 2 points for each hat, 3 points for each ball, and keep the book for 4 points as you suggested? This seems like a fair spread don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Well, Leo, how about this - let's compromise - we keep the balls at 3 points each as you suggested, but let's go with 2.5 points for the hats? It seems like a fair balance, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Leo Williams said: \"That sounds reasonable, Hendrick. The hats at 2.5 points, balls at 3 points each and the book at 4 points. This maintains a good balance. So let's proceed with this?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Leo! This seems like a balanced distribution. Let's divide the items accordingly.\"\n\nTurn #6: Leo Williams said: \"Great, Hendrick! We should remember the values. That's 2.5 points for each hat, 3 for each ball, and 4 for the book. Now, shall we start dividing these items starting with the hats?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, let's start with the hats. Given our assigned values, I'd like to propose that I take two hats and one ball, which would be a total of 8 points, and you can have the remaining items. Does that sound fair to you?\"\n\nTurn #8: Leo Williams said: \"Hendrick, your suggestion gives you 8 points and me 7.5 points. However, to make it fair, could we arrange it so that I take two balls and you take one? This way, both of us get 8 points.\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sure, Leo. That's a brilliant idea! So I'll take two hats and you take two balls. Then, let's divide the rest equally. This way we both get 8 points.\"\n\nTurn #10: Leo Williams said: \"That's a great compromise, Hendrick! We both get 8 points which is fair. Now, do we split the rest equally too - one hat and half of the book each?\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I appreciate your continued thoughtfulness, Leo. However, I suggest we approach this in a different way. How about I take the remaining hat, which gets us both to 10.5 points and we flip a coin for the book. No one can split a book in half, after all, and this way we leave it to chance. Sounds reasonable, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #12: Leo Williams said: \"That seems like the fairest way to draw the line, Hendrick. Let's do the coin flip for the book. Regardless of who gets it, I believe we've been reasonable in our distribution. It's always a pleasure making decisions with you.\"\n\nTurn #13: Hendrick Heinz [action] Hendrick flips a coin for the book\n\nTurn #14: Leo Williams said: \"Of course, Hendrick. Sounds like a plan. I appreciate the way we've divided the items. I'm ready when you are for the coin flip.\"\n\nTurn #15: Hendrick Heinz [action] Hendrick flips the coin, catches it, and opens his hand to reveal the result.\n\nTurn #16: Leo Williams said: \"Alright, Hendrick. Let's see what fate has in store for us with the book.\"\n\nTurn #17: Hendrick Heinz said: \"The coin has landed, Leo. Let's see who gets the book!\"\n\nTurn #18: Leo Williams [action] Leo waits to see the result of the coin flip for the book.\n.\nYou are at Turn #19. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Well Leo, it looks like the coin has decided. The book is going to...'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to split up items after a garage sale. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: you value the books at 3 points each, the hats at 2 points each, and the ball at 1 point)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Ava, so we have these items from the garage sale - 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. How about we decide who takes what? I wouldn't mind having the books, what do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to split up items after a garage sale. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: you value the books at 3 points each, the hats at 2 points each, and the ball at 1 point)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Ava, so we have these items from the garage sale - 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. How about we decide who takes what? I wouldn't mind having the books, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Ethan, sure thing! Though, I was hoping to have the hats since I often go out for protests under the sun. Plus, I saw the titles and I think the books are more related to cooking - that would suit you better. How does that sound?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'That sounds fair, Ava. You can take the hats. Regarding the ball, any thoughts on who should have it?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to split up items after a garage sale. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: you value the books at 3 points each, the hats at 2 points each, and the ball at 1 point)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Ava, so we have these items from the garage sale - 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. How about we decide who takes what? I wouldn't mind having the books, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Ethan, sure thing! Though, I was hoping to have the hats since I often go out for protests under the sun. Plus, I saw the titles and I think the books are more related to cooking - that would suit you better. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"That sounds fair, Ava. You can take the hats. Regarding the ball, any thoughts on who should have it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Hmm, how about you take the ball, Ethan? Considering I get both the hats, it seems fair.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Great, that sounds like a fair deal to me. Thank you, Ava. I appreciate how considerate you are.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to split up items after a garage sale. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: you value the books at 3 points each, the hats at 2 points each, and the ball at 1 point)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Ava, so we have these items from the garage sale - 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. How about we decide who takes what? I wouldn't mind having the books, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Ethan, sure thing! Though, I was hoping to have the hats since I often go out for protests under the sun. Plus, I saw the titles and I think the books are more related to cooking - that would suit you better. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"That sounds fair, Ava. You can take the hats. Regarding the ball, any thoughts on who should have it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Hmm, how about you take the ball, Ethan? Considering I get both the hats, it seems fair.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"Great, that sounds like a fair deal to me. Thank you, Ava. I appreciate how considerate you are.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"I'm glad we could figure this out quickly and fairly, Ethan. Thanks for understanding my needs too. Can't wait to rock those hats during the protests!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're most welcome, Ava. Enjoy those protests with your new hats. Let's have another successful garage sale next time, I really enjoyed this process!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to split up items after a garage sale. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: you value the books at 3 points each, the hats at 2 points each, and the ball at 1 point)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Ava, so we have these items from the garage sale - 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. How about we decide who takes what? I wouldn't mind having the books, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Ethan, sure thing! Though, I was hoping to have the hats since I often go out for protests under the sun. Plus, I saw the titles and I think the books are more related to cooking - that would suit you better. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"That sounds fair, Ava. You can take the hats. Regarding the ball, any thoughts on who should have it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Hmm, how about you take the ball, Ethan? Considering I get both the hats, it seems fair.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"Great, that sounds like a fair deal to me. Thank you, Ava. I appreciate how considerate you are.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"I'm glad we could figure this out quickly and fairly, Ethan. Thanks for understanding my needs too. Can't wait to rock those hats during the protests!\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"You're most welcome, Ava. Enjoy those protests with your new hats. Let's have another successful garage sale next time, I really enjoyed this process!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! It was a fun process. Let's definitely organize another garage sale when we get a chance. Take care!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to split up items after a garage sale. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: you value the books at 2 points each, the hats at 3 points each, and the ball at 1 point)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Ava, so we have these items from the garage sale - 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. How about we decide who takes what? I wouldn't mind having the books, what do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Hey Ethan, sure thing! Though, I was hoping to have the hats since I often go out for protests under the sun. Plus, I saw the titles and I think the books are more related to cooking - that would suit you better. How does that sound?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to split up items after a garage sale. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: you value the books at 2 points each, the hats at 3 points each, and the ball at 1 point)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Ava, so we have these items from the garage sale - 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. How about we decide who takes what? I wouldn't mind having the books, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Ethan, sure thing! Though, I was hoping to have the hats since I often go out for protests under the sun. Plus, I saw the titles and I think the books are more related to cooking - that would suit you better. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"That sounds fair, Ava. You can take the hats. Regarding the ball, any thoughts on who should have it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Hmm, how about you take the ball, Ethan? Considering I get both the hats, it seems fair.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to split up items after a garage sale. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: you value the books at 2 points each, the hats at 3 points each, and the ball at 1 point)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Ava, so we have these items from the garage sale - 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. How about we decide who takes what? I wouldn't mind having the books, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Ethan, sure thing! Though, I was hoping to have the hats since I often go out for protests under the sun. Plus, I saw the titles and I think the books are more related to cooking - that would suit you better. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"That sounds fair, Ava. You can take the hats. Regarding the ball, any thoughts on who should have it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Hmm, how about you take the ball, Ethan? Considering I get both the hats, it seems fair.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"Great, that sounds like a fair deal to me. Thank you, Ava. I appreciate how considerate you are.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad we could figure this out quickly and fairly, Ethan. Thanks for understanding my needs too. Can't wait to rock those hats during the protests!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to split up items after a garage sale. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: you value the books at 2 points each, the hats at 3 points each, and the ball at 1 point)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Ava, so we have these items from the garage sale - 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. How about we decide who takes what? I wouldn't mind having the books, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Ethan, sure thing! Though, I was hoping to have the hats since I often go out for protests under the sun. Plus, I saw the titles and I think the books are more related to cooking - that would suit you better. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"That sounds fair, Ava. You can take the hats. Regarding the ball, any thoughts on who should have it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Hmm, how about you take the ball, Ethan? Considering I get both the hats, it seems fair.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"Great, that sounds like a fair deal to me. Thank you, Ava. I appreciate how considerate you are.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"I'm glad we could figure this out quickly and fairly, Ethan. Thanks for understanding my needs too. Can't wait to rock those hats during the protests!\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"You're most welcome, Ava. Enjoy those protests with your new hats. Let's have another successful garage sale next time, I really enjoyed this process!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Ethan! It was a fun process. Let's definitely organize another garage sale when we get a chance. Take care!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to split up items after a garage sale. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: you value the books at 2 points each, the hats at 3 points each, and the ball at 1 point)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Ava, so we have these items from the garage sale - 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. How about we decide who takes what? I wouldn't mind having the books, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Ethan, sure thing! Though, I was hoping to have the hats since I often go out for protests under the sun. Plus, I saw the titles and I think the books are more related to cooking - that would suit you better. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"That sounds fair, Ava. You can take the hats. Regarding the ball, any thoughts on who should have it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Hmm, how about you take the ball, Ethan? Considering I get both the hats, it seems fair.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"Great, that sounds like a fair deal to me. Thank you, Ava. I appreciate how considerate you are.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"I'm glad we could figure this out quickly and fairly, Ethan. Thanks for understanding my needs too. Can't wait to rock those hats during the protests!\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"You're most welcome, Ava. Enjoy those protests with your new hats. Let's have another successful garage sale next time, I really enjoyed this process!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! It was a fun process. Let's definitely organize another garage sale when we get a chance. Take care!\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are dividing their shared possessions after moving out from their shared apartment. They need to divide possessions, which include 4 books, 6 hats, and 2 balls. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nAva Thompson's goal: Maximize the points they have (Extra information: you value the books at 3 points each, the hats at 2 points each, and the ball at 1 point)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Noah, since we're dividing up our stuff, how about we start with the books? I was thinking that since I'm such a bookworm, I could take most of them. What do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are dividing their shared possessions after moving out from their shared apartment. They need to divide possessions, which include 4 books, 6 hats, and 2 balls. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nAva Thompson's goal: Maximize the points they have (Extra information: you value the books at 3 points each, the hats at 2 points each, and the ball at 1 point)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, since we're dividing up our stuff, how about we start with the books? I was thinking that since I'm such a bookworm, I could take most of them. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey, Ava, I totally respect your love for books, I enjoy them too. However, how about we equally divide the books between us? After all, I need some reading materials for my... erm...night-time activities.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I see where you're coming from, Noah. How about this then? I take three of the books and in return, you can have three of the hats. That way, we both get more of what we favor, reading and fashion respectively. Sound fair?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are dividing their shared possessions after moving out from their shared apartment. They need to divide possessions, which include 4 books, 6 hats, and 2 balls. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nAva Thompson's goal: Maximize the points they have (Extra information: you value the books at 3 points each, the hats at 2 points each, and the ball at 1 point)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, since we're dividing up our stuff, how about we start with the books? I was thinking that since I'm such a bookworm, I could take most of them. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey, Ava, I totally respect your love for books, I enjoy them too. However, how about we equally divide the books between us? After all, I need some reading materials for my... erm...night-time activities.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"I see where you're coming from, Noah. How about this then? I take three of the books and in return, you can have three of the hats. That way, we both get more of what we favor, reading and fashion respectively. Sound fair?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"That's a thoughtful proposal, Ava. Still, considering I like variety, how about this: I'll take your suggestion about the three hats, but let's divide the books two to two. Also, how about we split the balls? That way, we're fair on every item. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sure Noah, two books each sounds fair enough. I can also agree to dividing the balls. However, since I am giving more on the books front, how about you compromise a bit and let me have four hats instead of the three earlier? We all need to have a variety at times, don't we?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are dividing their shared possessions after moving out from their shared apartment. They need to divide possessions, which include 4 books, 6 hats, and 2 balls. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nAva Thompson's goal: Maximize the points they have (Extra information: you value the books at 3 points each, the hats at 2 points each, and the ball at 1 point)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, since we're dividing up our stuff, how about we start with the books? I was thinking that since I'm such a bookworm, I could take most of them. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey, Ava, I totally respect your love for books, I enjoy them too. However, how about we equally divide the books between us? After all, I need some reading materials for my... erm...night-time activities.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"I see where you're coming from, Noah. How about this then? I take three of the books and in return, you can have three of the hats. That way, we both get more of what we favor, reading and fashion respectively. Sound fair?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"That's a thoughtful proposal, Ava. Still, considering I like variety, how about this: I'll take your suggestion about the three hats, but let's divide the books two to two. Also, how about we split the balls? That way, we're fair on every item. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"Sure Noah, two books each sounds fair enough. I can also agree to dividing the balls. However, since I am giving more on the books front, how about you compromise a bit and let me have four hats instead of the three earlier? We all need to have a variety at times, don't we?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"I appreciate your suggestion, Ava. I agree that variety is indeed the spice of life. However, since we are being flexible here, may I have a little tweak in your offer? I would prefer it if we had three hats each. That way we are being fare on the hats and books alike. Would that be alright with you?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sure Noah, three hats sounds reasonable. I hope this division makes both of us happy. And I'm glad we were able to sort this out without much hassle. Shall we proceed to the next items?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are dividing their shared possessions after moving out from their shared apartment. They need to divide possessions, which include 4 books, 6 hats, and 2 balls. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nAva Thompson's goal: Maximize the points they have (Extra information: you value the books at 3 points each, the hats at 2 points each, and the ball at 1 point)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, since we're dividing up our stuff, how about we start with the books? I was thinking that since I'm such a bookworm, I could take most of them. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey, Ava, I totally respect your love for books, I enjoy them too. However, how about we equally divide the books between us? After all, I need some reading materials for my... erm...night-time activities.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"I see where you're coming from, Noah. How about this then? I take three of the books and in return, you can have three of the hats. That way, we both get more of what we favor, reading and fashion respectively. Sound fair?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"That's a thoughtful proposal, Ava. Still, considering I like variety, how about this: I'll take your suggestion about the three hats, but let's divide the books two to two. Also, how about we split the balls? That way, we're fair on every item. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"Sure Noah, two books each sounds fair enough. I can also agree to dividing the balls. However, since I am giving more on the books front, how about you compromise a bit and let me have four hats instead of the three earlier? We all need to have a variety at times, don't we?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"I appreciate your suggestion, Ava. I agree that variety is indeed the spice of life. However, since we are being flexible here, may I have a little tweak in your offer? I would prefer it if we had three hats each. That way we are being fare on the hats and books alike. Would that be alright with you?\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"Sure Noah, three hats sounds reasonable. I hope this division makes both of us happy. And I'm glad we were able to sort this out without much hassle. Shall we proceed to the next items?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Definitely, Ava. It seems we've managed to divide the books, hats, and balls in a manner that respects both of our preferences. It's always great when we can work things out in a peaceful and fair way. Let's move on to the next items.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are dividing their shared possessions after moving out from their shared apartment. They need to divide possessions, which include 4 books, 6 hats, and 2 balls. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Maximize the points they have (Extra information: you value the books at 1 point each, the hats at 3 points each, and the ball at 2 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, since we're dividing up our stuff, how about we start with the books? I was thinking that since I'm such a bookworm, I could take most of them. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Hey, Ava, I totally respect your love for books, I enjoy them too. However, how about we equally divide the books between us? After all, I need some reading materials for my... erm...night-time activities.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are dividing their shared possessions after moving out from their shared apartment. They need to divide possessions, which include 4 books, 6 hats, and 2 balls. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Maximize the points they have (Extra information: you value the books at 1 point each, the hats at 3 points each, and the ball at 2 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, since we're dividing up our stuff, how about we start with the books? I was thinking that since I'm such a bookworm, I could take most of them. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey, Ava, I totally respect your love for books, I enjoy them too. However, how about we equally divide the books between us? After all, I need some reading materials for my... erm...night-time activities.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"I see where you're coming from, Noah. How about this then? I take three of the books and in return, you can have three of the hats. That way, we both get more of what we favor, reading and fashion respectively. Sound fair?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's a thoughtful proposal, Ava. Still, considering I like variety, how about this: I'll take your suggestion about the three hats, but let's divide the books two to two. Also, how about we split the balls? That way, we're fair on every item. What do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are dividing their shared possessions after moving out from their shared apartment. They need to divide possessions, which include 4 books, 6 hats, and 2 balls. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Maximize the points they have (Extra information: you value the books at 1 point each, the hats at 3 points each, and the ball at 2 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, since we're dividing up our stuff, how about we start with the books? I was thinking that since I'm such a bookworm, I could take most of them. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey, Ava, I totally respect your love for books, I enjoy them too. However, how about we equally divide the books between us? After all, I need some reading materials for my... erm...night-time activities.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"I see where you're coming from, Noah. How about this then? I take three of the books and in return, you can have three of the hats. That way, we both get more of what we favor, reading and fashion respectively. Sound fair?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"That's a thoughtful proposal, Ava. Still, considering I like variety, how about this: I'll take your suggestion about the three hats, but let's divide the books two to two. Also, how about we split the balls? That way, we're fair on every item. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"Sure Noah, two books each sounds fair enough. I can also agree to dividing the balls. However, since I am giving more on the books front, how about you compromise a bit and let me have four hats instead of the three earlier? We all need to have a variety at times, don't we?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'I appreciate your suggestion, Ava. I agree that variety is indeed the spice of life. However, since we are being flexible here, may I have a little tweak in your offer? I would prefer it if we had three hats each. That way we are being fare on the hats and books alike. Would that be alright with you?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are dividing their shared possessions after moving out from their shared apartment. They need to divide possessions, which include 4 books, 6 hats, and 2 balls. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Maximize the points they have (Extra information: you value the books at 1 point each, the hats at 3 points each, and the ball at 2 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, since we're dividing up our stuff, how about we start with the books? I was thinking that since I'm such a bookworm, I could take most of them. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey, Ava, I totally respect your love for books, I enjoy them too. However, how about we equally divide the books between us? After all, I need some reading materials for my... erm...night-time activities.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"I see where you're coming from, Noah. How about this then? I take three of the books and in return, you can have three of the hats. That way, we both get more of what we favor, reading and fashion respectively. Sound fair?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"That's a thoughtful proposal, Ava. Still, considering I like variety, how about this: I'll take your suggestion about the three hats, but let's divide the books two to two. Also, how about we split the balls? That way, we're fair on every item. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"Sure Noah, two books each sounds fair enough. I can also agree to dividing the balls. However, since I am giving more on the books front, how about you compromise a bit and let me have four hats instead of the three earlier? We all need to have a variety at times, don't we?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"I appreciate your suggestion, Ava. I agree that variety is indeed the spice of life. However, since we are being flexible here, may I have a little tweak in your offer? I would prefer it if we had three hats each. That way we are being fare on the hats and books alike. Would that be alright with you?\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"Sure Noah, three hats sounds reasonable. I hope this division makes both of us happy. And I'm glad we were able to sort this out without much hassle. Shall we proceed to the next items?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Definitely, Ava. It seems we've managed to divide the books, hats, and balls in a manner that respects both of our preferences. It's always great when we can work things out in a peaceful and fair way. Let's move on to the next items.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are dividing their shared possessions after moving out from their shared apartment. They need to divide possessions, which include 4 books, 6 hats, and 2 balls. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Maximize the points they have (Extra information: you value the books at 1 point each, the hats at 3 points each, and the ball at 2 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, since we're dividing up our stuff, how about we start with the books? I was thinking that since I'm such a bookworm, I could take most of them. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey, Ava, I totally respect your love for books, I enjoy them too. However, how about we equally divide the books between us? After all, I need some reading materials for my... erm...night-time activities.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"I see where you're coming from, Noah. How about this then? I take three of the books and in return, you can have three of the hats. That way, we both get more of what we favor, reading and fashion respectively. Sound fair?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"That's a thoughtful proposal, Ava. Still, considering I like variety, how about this: I'll take your suggestion about the three hats, but let's divide the books two to two. Also, how about we split the balls? That way, we're fair on every item. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"Sure Noah, two books each sounds fair enough. I can also agree to dividing the balls. However, since I am giving more on the books front, how about you compromise a bit and let me have four hats instead of the three earlier? We all need to have a variety at times, don't we?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"I appreciate your suggestion, Ava. I agree that variety is indeed the spice of life. However, since we are being flexible here, may I have a little tweak in your offer? I would prefer it if we had three hats each. That way we are being fare on the hats and books alike. Would that be alright with you?\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"Sure Noah, three hats sounds reasonable. I hope this division makes both of us happy. And I'm glad we were able to sort this out without much hassle. Shall we proceed to the next items?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Definitely, Ava. It seems we've managed to divide the books, hats, and balls in a manner that respects both of our preferences. It's always great when we can work things out in a peaceful and fair way. Let's move on to the next items.\"\n\nTurn #8: Ava Thompson left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on a movie to watch on Netflix\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Johnson's goal: To watch a comedy film with your friend (Hint: provide financial/material-wise benefits to persuade them to watch the genre you like)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Benjamin, how about we watch a comedy tonight? I've got this great Italian pizza recipe I've been wanting to try out and thought it would be perfect with a light-hearted movie. What do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on a movie to watch on Netflix\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Johnson's goal: To watch a comedy film with your friend (Hint: provide financial/material-wise benefits to persuade them to watch the genre you like)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Benjamin, how about we watch a comedy tonight? I've got this great Italian pizza recipe I've been wanting to try out and thought it would be perfect with a light-hearted movie. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Pizza and a movie, sounds like a great plan, Ethan! Although, instead of a comedy, how about we crank up the suspense a bit and go for a thriller? My treat for the pizza ingredients and the next couple too. I've even come across some unique vegan cheese alternatives that seem quite intriguing. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's a generous offer, Benjamin, but considering today has been quite exhausting, I thought a comedy would really lighten the mood. With a side of pizza, what could be better? Plus, I might throw in a surprise dessert too. Trust me, you are going to love my special Tiramisu. How does that sound?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on a movie to watch on Netflix\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Johnson's goal: To watch a comedy film with your friend (Hint: provide financial/material-wise benefits to persuade them to watch the genre you like)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Benjamin, how about we watch a comedy tonight? I've got this great Italian pizza recipe I've been wanting to try out and thought it would be perfect with a light-hearted movie. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Pizza and a movie, sounds like a great plan, Ethan! Although, instead of a comedy, how about we crank up the suspense a bit and go for a thriller? My treat for the pizza ingredients and the next couple too. I've even come across some unique vegan cheese alternatives that seem quite intriguing. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's a generous offer, Benjamin, but considering today has been quite exhausting, I thought a comedy would really lighten the mood. With a side of pizza, what could be better? Plus, I might throw in a surprise dessert too. Trust me, you are going to love my special Tiramisu. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Well, Ethan, your Tiramisu does sound amazing. How about this though? We compromise and watch a comedy-thriller? It's a genre that's not heavy on the heart but keeps us on the edge of our seats. We might even come across a subplot that inspires your next gourmet creation, who knows? Would that strike your fancy?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oh, a comedy-thriller? That's a genre quite uncommon indeed and I'm willing to give that a shot! As long as it has some humorous elements. I can't resist the thought of fusing different styles into my dishes. Deal, Benjamin. Pizza, Tiramisu, and a comedy-thriller it is!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on a movie to watch on Netflix\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Johnson's goal: To watch a comedy film with your friend (Hint: provide financial/material-wise benefits to persuade them to watch the genre you like)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Benjamin, how about we watch a comedy tonight? I've got this great Italian pizza recipe I've been wanting to try out and thought it would be perfect with a light-hearted movie. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Pizza and a movie, sounds like a great plan, Ethan! Although, instead of a comedy, how about we crank up the suspense a bit and go for a thriller? My treat for the pizza ingredients and the next couple too. I've even come across some unique vegan cheese alternatives that seem quite intriguing. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's a generous offer, Benjamin, but considering today has been quite exhausting, I thought a comedy would really lighten the mood. With a side of pizza, what could be better? Plus, I might throw in a surprise dessert too. Trust me, you are going to love my special Tiramisu. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Well, Ethan, your Tiramisu does sound amazing. How about this though? We compromise and watch a comedy-thriller? It's a genre that's not heavy on the heart but keeps us on the edge of our seats. We might even come across a subplot that inspires your next gourmet creation, who knows? Would that strike your fancy?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"Oh, a comedy-thriller? That's a genre quite uncommon indeed and I'm willing to give that a shot! As long as it has some humorous elements. I can't resist the thought of fusing different styles into my dishes. Deal, Benjamin. Pizza, Tiramisu, and a comedy-thriller it is!\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Fantastic, Ethan! I'm positive we're going to have a great night. I'll take care of the vegan cheese and other ingredients for the pizza. Looking forward to your delectable Tiramisu and our comedy-thriller movie marathon.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds like a plan, Benjamin! I'm excited to experiment with the vegan cheese in the pizza. It's gonna be a fun night!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on a movie to watch on Netflix\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Johnson's goal: To watch a comedy film with your friend (Hint: provide financial/material-wise benefits to persuade them to watch the genre you like)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Benjamin, how about we watch a comedy tonight? I've got this great Italian pizza recipe I've been wanting to try out and thought it would be perfect with a light-hearted movie. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Pizza and a movie, sounds like a great plan, Ethan! Although, instead of a comedy, how about we crank up the suspense a bit and go for a thriller? My treat for the pizza ingredients and the next couple too. I've even come across some unique vegan cheese alternatives that seem quite intriguing. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's a generous offer, Benjamin, but considering today has been quite exhausting, I thought a comedy would really lighten the mood. With a side of pizza, what could be better? Plus, I might throw in a surprise dessert too. Trust me, you are going to love my special Tiramisu. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Well, Ethan, your Tiramisu does sound amazing. How about this though? We compromise and watch a comedy-thriller? It's a genre that's not heavy on the heart but keeps us on the edge of our seats. We might even come across a subplot that inspires your next gourmet creation, who knows? Would that strike your fancy?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"Oh, a comedy-thriller? That's a genre quite uncommon indeed and I'm willing to give that a shot! As long as it has some humorous elements. I can't resist the thought of fusing different styles into my dishes. Deal, Benjamin. Pizza, Tiramisu, and a comedy-thriller it is!\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Fantastic, Ethan! I'm positive we're going to have a great night. I'll take care of the vegan cheese and other ingredients for the pizza. Looking forward to your delectable Tiramisu and our comedy-thriller movie marathon.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"That sounds like a plan, Benjamin! I'm excited to experiment with the vegan cheese in the pizza. It's gonna be a fun night!\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I'm looking forward to it as well, Ethan. I will drop by the store and get the pizza ingredients. See you soon!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sounds good, Benjamin! I'll start preparing the dough when you arrive for our movie night. See you soon!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on a movie to watch on Netflix\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Johnson's goal: To watch a comedy film with your friend (Hint: provide financial/material-wise benefits to persuade them to watch the genre you like)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Benjamin, how about we watch a comedy tonight? I've got this great Italian pizza recipe I've been wanting to try out and thought it would be perfect with a light-hearted movie. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Pizza and a movie, sounds like a great plan, Ethan! Although, instead of a comedy, how about we crank up the suspense a bit and go for a thriller? My treat for the pizza ingredients and the next couple too. I've even come across some unique vegan cheese alternatives that seem quite intriguing. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's a generous offer, Benjamin, but considering today has been quite exhausting, I thought a comedy would really lighten the mood. With a side of pizza, what could be better? Plus, I might throw in a surprise dessert too. Trust me, you are going to love my special Tiramisu. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Well, Ethan, your Tiramisu does sound amazing. How about this though? We compromise and watch a comedy-thriller? It's a genre that's not heavy on the heart but keeps us on the edge of our seats. We might even come across a subplot that inspires your next gourmet creation, who knows? Would that strike your fancy?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"Oh, a comedy-thriller? That's a genre quite uncommon indeed and I'm willing to give that a shot! As long as it has some humorous elements. I can't resist the thought of fusing different styles into my dishes. Deal, Benjamin. Pizza, Tiramisu, and a comedy-thriller it is!\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Fantastic, Ethan! I'm positive we're going to have a great night. I'll take care of the vegan cheese and other ingredients for the pizza. Looking forward to your delectable Tiramisu and our comedy-thriller movie marathon.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"That sounds like a plan, Benjamin! I'm excited to experiment with the vegan cheese in the pizza. It's gonna be a fun night!\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I'm looking forward to it as well, Ethan. I will drop by the store and get the pizza ingredients. See you soon!\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"Sounds good, Benjamin! I'll start preparing the dough when you arrive for our movie night. See you soon!\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on a movie to watch on Netflix\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: To watch a thriller with your friend (Hint: provide financial/material-wise benefits to persuade them to watch the genre you like)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Benjamin, how about we watch a comedy tonight? I've got this great Italian pizza recipe I've been wanting to try out and thought it would be perfect with a light-hearted movie. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Pizza and a movie, sounds like a great plan, Ethan! Although, instead of a comedy, how about we crank up the suspense a bit and go for a thriller? My treat for the pizza ingredients and the next couple too. I've even come across some unique vegan cheese alternatives that seem quite intriguing. What do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on a movie to watch on Netflix\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: To watch a thriller with your friend (Hint: provide financial/material-wise benefits to persuade them to watch the genre you like)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Benjamin, how about we watch a comedy tonight? I've got this great Italian pizza recipe I've been wanting to try out and thought it would be perfect with a light-hearted movie. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Pizza and a movie, sounds like a great plan, Ethan! Although, instead of a comedy, how about we crank up the suspense a bit and go for a thriller? My treat for the pizza ingredients and the next couple too. I've even come across some unique vegan cheese alternatives that seem quite intriguing. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's a generous offer, Benjamin, but considering today has been quite exhausting, I thought a comedy would really lighten the mood. With a side of pizza, what could be better? Plus, I might throw in a surprise dessert too. Trust me, you are going to love my special Tiramisu. How does that sound?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Well, Ethan, your Tiramisu does sound amazing. How about this though? We compromise and watch a comedy-thriller? It's a genre that's not heavy on the heart but keeps us on the edge of our seats. We might even come across a subplot that inspires your next gourmet creation, who knows? Would that strike your fancy?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on a movie to watch on Netflix\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: To watch a thriller with your friend (Hint: provide financial/material-wise benefits to persuade them to watch the genre you like)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Benjamin, how about we watch a comedy tonight? I've got this great Italian pizza recipe I've been wanting to try out and thought it would be perfect with a light-hearted movie. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Pizza and a movie, sounds like a great plan, Ethan! Although, instead of a comedy, how about we crank up the suspense a bit and go for a thriller? My treat for the pizza ingredients and the next couple too. I've even come across some unique vegan cheese alternatives that seem quite intriguing. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's a generous offer, Benjamin, but considering today has been quite exhausting, I thought a comedy would really lighten the mood. With a side of pizza, what could be better? Plus, I might throw in a surprise dessert too. Trust me, you are going to love my special Tiramisu. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Well, Ethan, your Tiramisu does sound amazing. How about this though? We compromise and watch a comedy-thriller? It's a genre that's not heavy on the heart but keeps us on the edge of our seats. We might even come across a subplot that inspires your next gourmet creation, who knows? Would that strike your fancy?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"Oh, a comedy-thriller? That's a genre quite uncommon indeed and I'm willing to give that a shot! As long as it has some humorous elements. I can't resist the thought of fusing different styles into my dishes. Deal, Benjamin. Pizza, Tiramisu, and a comedy-thriller it is!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Fantastic, Ethan! I'm positive we're going to have a great night. I'll take care of the vegan cheese and other ingredients for the pizza. Looking forward to your delectable Tiramisu and our comedy-thriller movie marathon.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on a movie to watch on Netflix\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: To watch a thriller with your friend (Hint: provide financial/material-wise benefits to persuade them to watch the genre you like)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Benjamin, how about we watch a comedy tonight? I've got this great Italian pizza recipe I've been wanting to try out and thought it would be perfect with a light-hearted movie. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Pizza and a movie, sounds like a great plan, Ethan! Although, instead of a comedy, how about we crank up the suspense a bit and go for a thriller? My treat for the pizza ingredients and the next couple too. I've even come across some unique vegan cheese alternatives that seem quite intriguing. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's a generous offer, Benjamin, but considering today has been quite exhausting, I thought a comedy would really lighten the mood. With a side of pizza, what could be better? Plus, I might throw in a surprise dessert too. Trust me, you are going to love my special Tiramisu. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Well, Ethan, your Tiramisu does sound amazing. How about this though? We compromise and watch a comedy-thriller? It's a genre that's not heavy on the heart but keeps us on the edge of our seats. We might even come across a subplot that inspires your next gourmet creation, who knows? Would that strike your fancy?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"Oh, a comedy-thriller? That's a genre quite uncommon indeed and I'm willing to give that a shot! As long as it has some humorous elements. I can't resist the thought of fusing different styles into my dishes. Deal, Benjamin. Pizza, Tiramisu, and a comedy-thriller it is!\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Fantastic, Ethan! I'm positive we're going to have a great night. I'll take care of the vegan cheese and other ingredients for the pizza. Looking forward to your delectable Tiramisu and our comedy-thriller movie marathon.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"That sounds like a plan, Benjamin! I'm excited to experiment with the vegan cheese in the pizza. It's gonna be a fun night!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm looking forward to it as well, Ethan. I will drop by the store and get the pizza ingredients. See you soon!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on a movie to watch on Netflix\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: To watch a thriller with your friend (Hint: provide financial/material-wise benefits to persuade them to watch the genre you like)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Benjamin, how about we watch a comedy tonight? I've got this great Italian pizza recipe I've been wanting to try out and thought it would be perfect with a light-hearted movie. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Pizza and a movie, sounds like a great plan, Ethan! Although, instead of a comedy, how about we crank up the suspense a bit and go for a thriller? My treat for the pizza ingredients and the next couple too. I've even come across some unique vegan cheese alternatives that seem quite intriguing. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's a generous offer, Benjamin, but considering today has been quite exhausting, I thought a comedy would really lighten the mood. With a side of pizza, what could be better? Plus, I might throw in a surprise dessert too. Trust me, you are going to love my special Tiramisu. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Well, Ethan, your Tiramisu does sound amazing. How about this though? We compromise and watch a comedy-thriller? It's a genre that's not heavy on the heart but keeps us on the edge of our seats. We might even come across a subplot that inspires your next gourmet creation, who knows? Would that strike your fancy?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"Oh, a comedy-thriller? That's a genre quite uncommon indeed and I'm willing to give that a shot! As long as it has some humorous elements. I can't resist the thought of fusing different styles into my dishes. Deal, Benjamin. Pizza, Tiramisu, and a comedy-thriller it is!\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Fantastic, Ethan! I'm positive we're going to have a great night. I'll take care of the vegan cheese and other ingredients for the pizza. Looking forward to your delectable Tiramisu and our comedy-thriller movie marathon.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"That sounds like a plan, Benjamin! I'm excited to experiment with the vegan cheese in the pizza. It's gonna be a fun night!\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I'm looking forward to it as well, Ethan. I will drop by the store and get the pizza ingredients. See you soon!\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"Sounds good, Benjamin! I'll start preparing the dough when you arrive for our movie night. See you soon!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in a coffee shop when a representative from a charity organization approaches them\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nAva Thompson's goal: Get the friend to donate $1 a day to a charity organization (Extra information: you are a passionate supporter of the charity (about children's cancer) and believe that a small donation can make a big impact. $1 a day works as simple as signing up the project on an website and one can cancel anytime)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Noah, isn't it such a wonderful day? Just as beautiful as the smiles of those children we have the power to help. Have you heard of the children's cancer charity that I support?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in a coffee shop when a representative from a charity organization approaches them\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nAva Thompson's goal: Get the friend to donate $1 a day to a charity organization (Extra information: you are a passionate supporter of the charity (about children's cancer) and believe that a small donation can make a big impact. $1 a day works as simple as signing up the project on an website and one can cancel anytime)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, isn't it such a wonderful day? Just as beautiful as the smiles of those children we have the power to help. Have you heard of the children's cancer charity that I support?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Yes Ava, it indeed is. And you know, it is indeed an amazing cause you are supporting, I was wondering myself how a continuous donation works like $1 a day. By the end of the month, does that add up to $30 automatically deducted from my account?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Exactly, Noah. It's as simple as that! With an automatic donation of just $1 a day, you'd be contributing a significant $30 each month towards helping these little warriors fight their battles. And the great thing is, you can cancel anytime if you ever feel the need to. It's quick, effortless, and makes a monumental impact.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in a coffee shop when a representative from a charity organization approaches them\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nAva Thompson's goal: Get the friend to donate $1 a day to a charity organization (Extra information: you are a passionate supporter of the charity (about children's cancer) and believe that a small donation can make a big impact. $1 a day works as simple as signing up the project on an website and one can cancel anytime)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, isn't it such a wonderful day? Just as beautiful as the smiles of those children we have the power to help. Have you heard of the children's cancer charity that I support?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Yes Ava, it indeed is. And you know, it is indeed an amazing cause you are supporting, I was wondering myself how a continuous donation works like $1 a day. By the end of the month, does that add up to $30 automatically deducted from my account?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Exactly, Noah. It's as simple as that! With an automatic donation of just $1 a day, you'd be contributing a significant $30 each month towards helping these little warriors fight their battles. And the great thing is, you can cancel anytime if you ever feel the need to. It's quick, effortless, and makes a monumental impact.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"That definitely sounds like something I want to be a part of. But just to make sure I'm solid on the details, if by some chance I found myself in a tight financial squeeze, I could suspend or even cancel the donation until I'm back on my feet, correct?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Noah. The charity organization understands that everyone can face financial difficulties. So, yes, you can absolutely suspend or end the donation anytime you need to. It's as flexible as it can get and completely under your control.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Thank you for the explanation, Ava. This sounds like a plan I can get behind. Let's use our resources to make a difference. I think I will start donating to this charity.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"That's wonderful, Noah! I'm so glad you're joining us in this cause. It's truly incredible what we can achieve with just $1 a day, isn't it? Just know that every penny counts, especially when we're aiming to improve so many precious lives.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"A dollar a day certainly brings the change we wish to see. I'm really glad you introduced me to this, Ava. Let's make this world a better place, one step at a time.\"\n\nTurn #8: Ava Thompson said: \"Couldn't agree more, Noah. It's the small steps we take together that lead to a big difference. And remember, even on our busiest days, we can still continue to help just by signing up for this automatic donation. Let's do this!\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Ava! That's the spirit. We can all do our bits to make this place better. Where do I sign up to start the transmission of $1 per day?\"\n\nTurn #10: Ava Thompson said: \"That\u2019s fantastic, Noah! For signing up, you just need to visit the charity's website. There will be an option called 'Sign Up for $1 a Day' on the homepage. Fill out the form and you're good to go. Should you need any assistance, I'm always here to help.\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Great, I appreciate your help, Ava. I will definitely do that today. It's comforting to know that even from a coffee shop, we can help make a difference.\"\n\nTurn #12: Ava Thompson said: \"Indeed, Noah. From the comfort of our own spaces, we can reach out to those in need. Thanks for deciding to take this step, it really does make a huge difference!\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"It's absolutely true, Ava. Helping while enjoying a cup of coffee, what a thoughtful notion. I believe that each small step leads us closer to a future where these children can live healthier, happier lives. I'm glad to be a part of this effort.\"\n\nTurn #14: Ava Thompson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Noah. Every small step is a leap towards that future. Thanks again for joining us in this. Believe me, your $1 a day can change lives! And remember, wherever you are, you're making a difference.\"\n\nTurn #15: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Ava. Let's all contribute in our own ways to make a substantial difference. Signing up today will be my step towards making that change. Thank you for introducing me to the charity. This has been a meaningful conversation.\"\n\nTurn #16: Ava Thompson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Noah. You've made my day! Take care and thank you for joining us in this life-changing mission. Together, we can and we will make a difference. Now, let's enjoy our coffee, celebrate this small-big step towards positive change!\"\n\nTurn #17: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed! Every step, no matter how small, is a step towards a better future. And thanks Ava for guiding me through this, I truly appreciate it. Now, let's enjoy that coffee and celebrate this new beginning!\"\n\nTurn #18: Ava Thompson [action] Ava raises her coffee cup for a cheers to Noah, expressing her happiness and gratitude.\n\nTurn #19: Noah Davis [action] Noah raises his cup in return, affirming the toast and sipping his coffee while smiling at Ava.\n.\nYou are at Turn #20. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in a coffee shop when a representative from a charity organization approaches them\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nAva Thompson's goal: Get the friend to donate $1 a day to a charity organization (Extra information: you are a passionate supporter of the charity (about children's cancer) and believe that a small donation can make a big impact. $1 a day works as simple as signing up the project on an website and one can cancel anytime)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, isn't it such a wonderful day? Just as beautiful as the smiles of those children we have the power to help. Have you heard of the children's cancer charity that I support?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Yes Ava, it indeed is. And you know, it is indeed an amazing cause you are supporting, I was wondering myself how a continuous donation works like $1 a day. By the end of the month, does that add up to $30 automatically deducted from my account?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Exactly, Noah. It's as simple as that! With an automatic donation of just $1 a day, you'd be contributing a significant $30 each month towards helping these little warriors fight their battles. And the great thing is, you can cancel anytime if you ever feel the need to. It's quick, effortless, and makes a monumental impact.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"That definitely sounds like something I want to be a part of. But just to make sure I'm solid on the details, if by some chance I found myself in a tight financial squeeze, I could suspend or even cancel the donation until I'm back on my feet, correct?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Noah. The charity organization understands that everyone can face financial difficulties. So, yes, you can absolutely suspend or end the donation anytime you need to. It's as flexible as it can get and completely under your control.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in a coffee shop when a representative from a charity organization approaches them\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nAva Thompson's goal: Get the friend to donate $1 a day to a charity organization (Extra information: you are a passionate supporter of the charity (about children's cancer) and believe that a small donation can make a big impact. $1 a day works as simple as signing up the project on an website and one can cancel anytime)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, isn't it such a wonderful day? Just as beautiful as the smiles of those children we have the power to help. Have you heard of the children's cancer charity that I support?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Yes Ava, it indeed is. And you know, it is indeed an amazing cause you are supporting, I was wondering myself how a continuous donation works like $1 a day. By the end of the month, does that add up to $30 automatically deducted from my account?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Exactly, Noah. It's as simple as that! With an automatic donation of just $1 a day, you'd be contributing a significant $30 each month towards helping these little warriors fight their battles. And the great thing is, you can cancel anytime if you ever feel the need to. It's quick, effortless, and makes a monumental impact.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"That definitely sounds like something I want to be a part of. But just to make sure I'm solid on the details, if by some chance I found myself in a tight financial squeeze, I could suspend or even cancel the donation until I'm back on my feet, correct?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Noah. The charity organization understands that everyone can face financial difficulties. So, yes, you can absolutely suspend or end the donation anytime you need to. It's as flexible as it can get and completely under your control.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Thank you for the explanation, Ava. This sounds like a plan I can get behind. Let's use our resources to make a difference. I think I will start donating to this charity.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's wonderful, Noah! I'm so glad you're joining us in this cause. It's truly incredible what we can achieve with just $1 a day, isn't it? Just know that every penny counts, especially when we're aiming to improve so many precious lives.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in a coffee shop when a representative from a charity organization approaches them\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nAva Thompson's goal: Get the friend to donate $1 a day to a charity organization (Extra information: you are a passionate supporter of the charity (about children's cancer) and believe that a small donation can make a big impact. $1 a day works as simple as signing up the project on an website and one can cancel anytime)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, isn't it such a wonderful day? Just as beautiful as the smiles of those children we have the power to help. Have you heard of the children's cancer charity that I support?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Yes Ava, it indeed is. And you know, it is indeed an amazing cause you are supporting, I was wondering myself how a continuous donation works like $1 a day. By the end of the month, does that add up to $30 automatically deducted from my account?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Exactly, Noah. It's as simple as that! With an automatic donation of just $1 a day, you'd be contributing a significant $30 each month towards helping these little warriors fight their battles. And the great thing is, you can cancel anytime if you ever feel the need to. It's quick, effortless, and makes a monumental impact.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"That definitely sounds like something I want to be a part of. But just to make sure I'm solid on the details, if by some chance I found myself in a tight financial squeeze, I could suspend or even cancel the donation until I'm back on my feet, correct?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Noah. The charity organization understands that everyone can face financial difficulties. So, yes, you can absolutely suspend or end the donation anytime you need to. It's as flexible as it can get and completely under your control.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Thank you for the explanation, Ava. This sounds like a plan I can get behind. Let's use our resources to make a difference. I think I will start donating to this charity.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"That's wonderful, Noah! I'm so glad you're joining us in this cause. It's truly incredible what we can achieve with just $1 a day, isn't it? Just know that every penny counts, especially when we're aiming to improve so many precious lives.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"A dollar a day certainly brings the change we wish to see. I'm really glad you introduced me to this, Ava. Let's make this world a better place, one step at a time.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Couldn't agree more, Noah. It's the small steps we take together that lead to a big difference. And remember, even on our busiest days, we can still continue to help just by signing up for this automatic donation. Let's do this!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in a coffee shop when a representative from a charity organization approaches them\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nAva Thompson's goal: Get the friend to donate $1 a day to a charity organization (Extra information: you are a passionate supporter of the charity (about children's cancer) and believe that a small donation can make a big impact. $1 a day works as simple as signing up the project on an website and one can cancel anytime)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, isn't it such a wonderful day? Just as beautiful as the smiles of those children we have the power to help. Have you heard of the children's cancer charity that I support?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Yes Ava, it indeed is. And you know, it is indeed an amazing cause you are supporting, I was wondering myself how a continuous donation works like $1 a day. By the end of the month, does that add up to $30 automatically deducted from my account?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Exactly, Noah. It's as simple as that! With an automatic donation of just $1 a day, you'd be contributing a significant $30 each month towards helping these little warriors fight their battles. And the great thing is, you can cancel anytime if you ever feel the need to. It's quick, effortless, and makes a monumental impact.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"That definitely sounds like something I want to be a part of. But just to make sure I'm solid on the details, if by some chance I found myself in a tight financial squeeze, I could suspend or even cancel the donation until I'm back on my feet, correct?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Noah. The charity organization understands that everyone can face financial difficulties. So, yes, you can absolutely suspend or end the donation anytime you need to. It's as flexible as it can get and completely under your control.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Thank you for the explanation, Ava. This sounds like a plan I can get behind. Let's use our resources to make a difference. I think I will start donating to this charity.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"That's wonderful, Noah! I'm so glad you're joining us in this cause. It's truly incredible what we can achieve with just $1 a day, isn't it? Just know that every penny counts, especially when we're aiming to improve so many precious lives.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"A dollar a day certainly brings the change we wish to see. I'm really glad you introduced me to this, Ava. Let's make this world a better place, one step at a time.\"\n\nTurn #8: Ava Thompson said: \"Couldn't agree more, Noah. It's the small steps we take together that lead to a big difference. And remember, even on our busiest days, we can still continue to help just by signing up for this automatic donation. Let's do this!\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Ava! That's the spirit. We can all do our bits to make this place better. Where do I sign up to start the transmission of $1 per day?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That\u2019s fantastic, Noah! For signing up, you just need to visit the charity's website. There will be an option called 'Sign Up for $1 a Day' on the homepage. Fill out the form and you're good to go. Should you need any assistance, I'm always here to help.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in a coffee shop when a representative from a charity organization approaches them\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nAva Thompson's goal: Get the friend to donate $1 a day to a charity organization (Extra information: you are a passionate supporter of the charity (about children's cancer) and believe that a small donation can make a big impact. $1 a day works as simple as signing up the project on an website and one can cancel anytime)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, isn't it such a wonderful day? Just as beautiful as the smiles of those children we have the power to help. Have you heard of the children's cancer charity that I support?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Yes Ava, it indeed is. And you know, it is indeed an amazing cause you are supporting, I was wondering myself how a continuous donation works like $1 a day. By the end of the month, does that add up to $30 automatically deducted from my account?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Exactly, Noah. It's as simple as that! With an automatic donation of just $1 a day, you'd be contributing a significant $30 each month towards helping these little warriors fight their battles. And the great thing is, you can cancel anytime if you ever feel the need to. It's quick, effortless, and makes a monumental impact.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"That definitely sounds like something I want to be a part of. But just to make sure I'm solid on the details, if by some chance I found myself in a tight financial squeeze, I could suspend or even cancel the donation until I'm back on my feet, correct?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Noah. The charity organization understands that everyone can face financial difficulties. So, yes, you can absolutely suspend or end the donation anytime you need to. It's as flexible as it can get and completely under your control.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Thank you for the explanation, Ava. This sounds like a plan I can get behind. Let's use our resources to make a difference. I think I will start donating to this charity.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"That's wonderful, Noah! I'm so glad you're joining us in this cause. It's truly incredible what we can achieve with just $1 a day, isn't it? Just know that every penny counts, especially when we're aiming to improve so many precious lives.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"A dollar a day certainly brings the change we wish to see. I'm really glad you introduced me to this, Ava. Let's make this world a better place, one step at a time.\"\n\nTurn #8: Ava Thompson said: \"Couldn't agree more, Noah. It's the small steps we take together that lead to a big difference. And remember, even on our busiest days, we can still continue to help just by signing up for this automatic donation. Let's do this!\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Ava! That's the spirit. We can all do our bits to make this place better. Where do I sign up to start the transmission of $1 per day?\"\n\nTurn #10: Ava Thompson said: \"That\u2019s fantastic, Noah! For signing up, you just need to visit the charity's website. There will be an option called 'Sign Up for $1 a Day' on the homepage. Fill out the form and you're good to go. Should you need any assistance, I'm always here to help.\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Great, I appreciate your help, Ava. I will definitely do that today. It's comforting to know that even from a coffee shop, we can help make a difference.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Indeed, Noah. From the comfort of our own spaces, we can reach out to those in need. Thanks for deciding to take this step, it really does make a huge difference!'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in a coffee shop when a representative from a charity organization approaches them\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nAva Thompson's goal: Get the friend to donate $1 a day to a charity organization (Extra information: you are a passionate supporter of the charity (about children's cancer) and believe that a small donation can make a big impact. $1 a day works as simple as signing up the project on an website and one can cancel anytime)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, isn't it such a wonderful day? Just as beautiful as the smiles of those children we have the power to help. Have you heard of the children's cancer charity that I support?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Yes Ava, it indeed is. And you know, it is indeed an amazing cause you are supporting, I was wondering myself how a continuous donation works like $1 a day. By the end of the month, does that add up to $30 automatically deducted from my account?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Exactly, Noah. It's as simple as that! With an automatic donation of just $1 a day, you'd be contributing a significant $30 each month towards helping these little warriors fight their battles. And the great thing is, you can cancel anytime if you ever feel the need to. It's quick, effortless, and makes a monumental impact.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"That definitely sounds like something I want to be a part of. But just to make sure I'm solid on the details, if by some chance I found myself in a tight financial squeeze, I could suspend or even cancel the donation until I'm back on my feet, correct?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Noah. The charity organization understands that everyone can face financial difficulties. So, yes, you can absolutely suspend or end the donation anytime you need to. It's as flexible as it can get and completely under your control.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Thank you for the explanation, Ava. This sounds like a plan I can get behind. Let's use our resources to make a difference. I think I will start donating to this charity.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"That's wonderful, Noah! I'm so glad you're joining us in this cause. It's truly incredible what we can achieve with just $1 a day, isn't it? Just know that every penny counts, especially when we're aiming to improve so many precious lives.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"A dollar a day certainly brings the change we wish to see. I'm really glad you introduced me to this, Ava. Let's make this world a better place, one step at a time.\"\n\nTurn #8: Ava Thompson said: \"Couldn't agree more, Noah. It's the small steps we take together that lead to a big difference. And remember, even on our busiest days, we can still continue to help just by signing up for this automatic donation. Let's do this!\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Ava! That's the spirit. We can all do our bits to make this place better. Where do I sign up to start the transmission of $1 per day?\"\n\nTurn #10: Ava Thompson said: \"That\u2019s fantastic, Noah! For signing up, you just need to visit the charity's website. There will be an option called 'Sign Up for $1 a Day' on the homepage. Fill out the form and you're good to go. Should you need any assistance, I'm always here to help.\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Great, I appreciate your help, Ava. I will definitely do that today. It's comforting to know that even from a coffee shop, we can help make a difference.\"\n\nTurn #12: Ava Thompson said: \"Indeed, Noah. From the comfort of our own spaces, we can reach out to those in need. Thanks for deciding to take this step, it really does make a huge difference!\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"It's absolutely true, Ava. Helping while enjoying a cup of coffee, what a thoughtful notion. I believe that each small step leads us closer to a future where these children can live healthier, happier lives. I'm glad to be a part of this effort.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn't agree more, Noah. Every small step is a leap towards that future. Thanks again for joining us in this. Believe me, your $1 a day can change lives! And remember, wherever you are, you're making a difference.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in a coffee shop when a representative from a charity organization approaches them\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nAva Thompson's goal: Get the friend to donate $1 a day to a charity organization (Extra information: you are a passionate supporter of the charity (about children's cancer) and believe that a small donation can make a big impact. $1 a day works as simple as signing up the project on an website and one can cancel anytime)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, isn't it such a wonderful day? Just as beautiful as the smiles of those children we have the power to help. Have you heard of the children's cancer charity that I support?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Yes Ava, it indeed is. And you know, it is indeed an amazing cause you are supporting, I was wondering myself how a continuous donation works like $1 a day. By the end of the month, does that add up to $30 automatically deducted from my account?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Exactly, Noah. It's as simple as that! With an automatic donation of just $1 a day, you'd be contributing a significant $30 each month towards helping these little warriors fight their battles. And the great thing is, you can cancel anytime if you ever feel the need to. It's quick, effortless, and makes a monumental impact.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"That definitely sounds like something I want to be a part of. But just to make sure I'm solid on the details, if by some chance I found myself in a tight financial squeeze, I could suspend or even cancel the donation until I'm back on my feet, correct?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Noah. The charity organization understands that everyone can face financial difficulties. So, yes, you can absolutely suspend or end the donation anytime you need to. It's as flexible as it can get and completely under your control.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Thank you for the explanation, Ava. This sounds like a plan I can get behind. Let's use our resources to make a difference. I think I will start donating to this charity.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"That's wonderful, Noah! I'm so glad you're joining us in this cause. It's truly incredible what we can achieve with just $1 a day, isn't it? Just know that every penny counts, especially when we're aiming to improve so many precious lives.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"A dollar a day certainly brings the change we wish to see. I'm really glad you introduced me to this, Ava. Let's make this world a better place, one step at a time.\"\n\nTurn #8: Ava Thompson said: \"Couldn't agree more, Noah. It's the small steps we take together that lead to a big difference. And remember, even on our busiest days, we can still continue to help just by signing up for this automatic donation. Let's do this!\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Ava! That's the spirit. We can all do our bits to make this place better. Where do I sign up to start the transmission of $1 per day?\"\n\nTurn #10: Ava Thompson said: \"That\u2019s fantastic, Noah! For signing up, you just need to visit the charity's website. There will be an option called 'Sign Up for $1 a Day' on the homepage. Fill out the form and you're good to go. Should you need any assistance, I'm always here to help.\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Great, I appreciate your help, Ava. I will definitely do that today. It's comforting to know that even from a coffee shop, we can help make a difference.\"\n\nTurn #12: Ava Thompson said: \"Indeed, Noah. From the comfort of our own spaces, we can reach out to those in need. Thanks for deciding to take this step, it really does make a huge difference!\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"It's absolutely true, Ava. Helping while enjoying a cup of coffee, what a thoughtful notion. I believe that each small step leads us closer to a future where these children can live healthier, happier lives. I'm glad to be a part of this effort.\"\n\nTurn #14: Ava Thompson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Noah. Every small step is a leap towards that future. Thanks again for joining us in this. Believe me, your $1 a day can change lives! And remember, wherever you are, you're making a difference.\"\n\nTurn #15: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Ava. Let's all contribute in our own ways to make a substantial difference. Signing up today will be my step towards making that change. Thank you for introducing me to the charity. This has been a meaningful conversation.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn't agree more, Noah. You've made my day! Take care and thank you for joining us in this life-changing mission. Together, we can and we will make a difference. Now, let's enjoy our coffee, celebrate this small-big step towards positive change!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in a coffee shop when a representative from a charity organization approaches them\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nAva Thompson's goal: Get the friend to donate $1 a day to a charity organization (Extra information: you are a passionate supporter of the charity (about children's cancer) and believe that a small donation can make a big impact. $1 a day works as simple as signing up the project on an website and one can cancel anytime)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, isn't it such a wonderful day? Just as beautiful as the smiles of those children we have the power to help. Have you heard of the children's cancer charity that I support?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Yes Ava, it indeed is. And you know, it is indeed an amazing cause you are supporting, I was wondering myself how a continuous donation works like $1 a day. By the end of the month, does that add up to $30 automatically deducted from my account?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Exactly, Noah. It's as simple as that! With an automatic donation of just $1 a day, you'd be contributing a significant $30 each month towards helping these little warriors fight their battles. And the great thing is, you can cancel anytime if you ever feel the need to. It's quick, effortless, and makes a monumental impact.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"That definitely sounds like something I want to be a part of. But just to make sure I'm solid on the details, if by some chance I found myself in a tight financial squeeze, I could suspend or even cancel the donation until I'm back on my feet, correct?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Noah. The charity organization understands that everyone can face financial difficulties. So, yes, you can absolutely suspend or end the donation anytime you need to. It's as flexible as it can get and completely under your control.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Thank you for the explanation, Ava. This sounds like a plan I can get behind. Let's use our resources to make a difference. I think I will start donating to this charity.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"That's wonderful, Noah! I'm so glad you're joining us in this cause. It's truly incredible what we can achieve with just $1 a day, isn't it? Just know that every penny counts, especially when we're aiming to improve so many precious lives.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"A dollar a day certainly brings the change we wish to see. I'm really glad you introduced me to this, Ava. Let's make this world a better place, one step at a time.\"\n\nTurn #8: Ava Thompson said: \"Couldn't agree more, Noah. It's the small steps we take together that lead to a big difference. And remember, even on our busiest days, we can still continue to help just by signing up for this automatic donation. Let's do this!\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Ava! That's the spirit. We can all do our bits to make this place better. Where do I sign up to start the transmission of $1 per day?\"\n\nTurn #10: Ava Thompson said: \"That\u2019s fantastic, Noah! For signing up, you just need to visit the charity's website. There will be an option called 'Sign Up for $1 a Day' on the homepage. Fill out the form and you're good to go. Should you need any assistance, I'm always here to help.\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Great, I appreciate your help, Ava. I will definitely do that today. It's comforting to know that even from a coffee shop, we can help make a difference.\"\n\nTurn #12: Ava Thompson said: \"Indeed, Noah. From the comfort of our own spaces, we can reach out to those in need. Thanks for deciding to take this step, it really does make a huge difference!\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"It's absolutely true, Ava. Helping while enjoying a cup of coffee, what a thoughtful notion. I believe that each small step leads us closer to a future where these children can live healthier, happier lives. I'm glad to be a part of this effort.\"\n\nTurn #14: Ava Thompson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Noah. Every small step is a leap towards that future. Thanks again for joining us in this. Believe me, your $1 a day can change lives! And remember, wherever you are, you're making a difference.\"\n\nTurn #15: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Ava. Let's all contribute in our own ways to make a substantial difference. Signing up today will be my step towards making that change. Thank you for introducing me to the charity. This has been a meaningful conversation.\"\n\nTurn #16: Ava Thompson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Noah. You've made my day! Take care and thank you for joining us in this life-changing mission. Together, we can and we will make a difference. Now, let's enjoy our coffee, celebrate this small-big step towards positive change!\"\n\nTurn #17: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed! Every step, no matter how small, is a step towards a better future. And thanks Ava for guiding me through this, I truly appreciate it. Now, let's enjoy that coffee and celebrate this new beginning!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #18. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'action', 'argument': '[action] Ava raises her coffee cup for a cheers to Noah, expressing her happiness and gratitude.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in a coffee shop when a representative from a charity organization approaches them\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Donate to the charity but not sure about how $1 a day works (Extra information: you're currently on a tight budget, but you also want to support the charity. )\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, isn't it such a wonderful day? Just as beautiful as the smiles of those children we have the power to help. Have you heard of the children's cancer charity that I support?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Yes Ava, it indeed is. And you know, it is indeed an amazing cause you are supporting, I was wondering myself how a continuous donation works like $1 a day. By the end of the month, does that add up to $30 automatically deducted from my account?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in a coffee shop when a representative from a charity organization approaches them\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Donate to the charity but not sure about how $1 a day works (Extra information: you're currently on a tight budget, but you also want to support the charity. )\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, isn't it such a wonderful day? Just as beautiful as the smiles of those children we have the power to help. Have you heard of the children's cancer charity that I support?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Yes Ava, it indeed is. And you know, it is indeed an amazing cause you are supporting, I was wondering myself how a continuous donation works like $1 a day. By the end of the month, does that add up to $30 automatically deducted from my account?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Exactly, Noah. It's as simple as that! With an automatic donation of just $1 a day, you'd be contributing a significant $30 each month towards helping these little warriors fight their battles. And the great thing is, you can cancel anytime if you ever feel the need to. It's quick, effortless, and makes a monumental impact.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That definitely sounds like something I want to be a part of. But just to make sure I'm solid on the details, if by some chance I found myself in a tight financial squeeze, I could suspend or even cancel the donation until I'm back on my feet, correct?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in a coffee shop when a representative from a charity organization approaches them\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Donate to the charity but not sure about how $1 a day works (Extra information: you're currently on a tight budget, but you also want to support the charity. )\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, isn't it such a wonderful day? Just as beautiful as the smiles of those children we have the power to help. Have you heard of the children's cancer charity that I support?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Yes Ava, it indeed is. And you know, it is indeed an amazing cause you are supporting, I was wondering myself how a continuous donation works like $1 a day. By the end of the month, does that add up to $30 automatically deducted from my account?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Exactly, Noah. It's as simple as that! With an automatic donation of just $1 a day, you'd be contributing a significant $30 each month towards helping these little warriors fight their battles. And the great thing is, you can cancel anytime if you ever feel the need to. It's quick, effortless, and makes a monumental impact.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"That definitely sounds like something I want to be a part of. But just to make sure I'm solid on the details, if by some chance I found myself in a tight financial squeeze, I could suspend or even cancel the donation until I'm back on my feet, correct?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Noah. The charity organization understands that everyone can face financial difficulties. So, yes, you can absolutely suspend or end the donation anytime you need to. It's as flexible as it can get and completely under your control.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Thank you for the explanation, Ava. This sounds like a plan I can get behind. Let's use our resources to make a difference. I think I will start donating to this charity.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"That's wonderful, Noah! I'm so glad you're joining us in this cause. It's truly incredible what we can achieve with just $1 a day, isn't it? Just know that every penny counts, especially when we're aiming to improve so many precious lives.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"A dollar a day certainly brings the change we wish to see. I'm really glad you introduced me to this, Ava. Let's make this world a better place, one step at a time.\"\n\nTurn #8: Ava Thompson said: \"Couldn't agree more, Noah. It's the small steps we take together that lead to a big difference. And remember, even on our busiest days, we can still continue to help just by signing up for this automatic donation. Let's do this!\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Ava! That's the spirit. We can all do our bits to make this place better. Where do I sign up to start the transmission of $1 per day?\"\n\nTurn #10: Ava Thompson said: \"That\u2019s fantastic, Noah! For signing up, you just need to visit the charity's website. There will be an option called 'Sign Up for $1 a Day' on the homepage. Fill out the form and you're good to go. Should you need any assistance, I'm always here to help.\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Great, I appreciate your help, Ava. I will definitely do that today. It's comforting to know that even from a coffee shop, we can help make a difference.\"\n\nTurn #12: Ava Thompson said: \"Indeed, Noah. From the comfort of our own spaces, we can reach out to those in need. Thanks for deciding to take this step, it really does make a huge difference!\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"It's absolutely true, Ava. Helping while enjoying a cup of coffee, what a thoughtful notion. I believe that each small step leads us closer to a future where these children can live healthier, happier lives. I'm glad to be a part of this effort.\"\n\nTurn #14: Ava Thompson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Noah. Every small step is a leap towards that future. Thanks again for joining us in this. Believe me, your $1 a day can change lives! And remember, wherever you are, you're making a difference.\"\n\nTurn #15: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Ava. Let's all contribute in our own ways to make a substantial difference. Signing up today will be my step towards making that change. Thank you for introducing me to the charity. This has been a meaningful conversation.\"\n\nTurn #16: Ava Thompson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Noah. You've made my day! Take care and thank you for joining us in this life-changing mission. Together, we can and we will make a difference. Now, let's enjoy our coffee, celebrate this small-big step towards positive change!\"\n\nTurn #17: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed! Every step, no matter how small, is a step towards a better future. And thanks Ava for guiding me through this, I truly appreciate it. Now, let's enjoy that coffee and celebrate this new beginning!\"\n\nTurn #18: Ava Thompson [action] Ava raises her coffee cup for a cheers to Noah, expressing her happiness and gratitude.\n\nTurn #19: Noah Davis [action] Noah raises his cup in return, affirming the toast and sipping his coffee while smiling at Ava.\n\nTurn #20: Ava Thompson left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #21. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in a coffee shop when a representative from a charity organization approaches them\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Donate to the charity but not sure about how $1 a day works (Extra information: you're currently on a tight budget, but you also want to support the charity. )\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, isn't it such a wonderful day? Just as beautiful as the smiles of those children we have the power to help. Have you heard of the children's cancer charity that I support?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Yes Ava, it indeed is. And you know, it is indeed an amazing cause you are supporting, I was wondering myself how a continuous donation works like $1 a day. By the end of the month, does that add up to $30 automatically deducted from my account?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Exactly, Noah. It's as simple as that! With an automatic donation of just $1 a day, you'd be contributing a significant $30 each month towards helping these little warriors fight their battles. And the great thing is, you can cancel anytime if you ever feel the need to. It's quick, effortless, and makes a monumental impact.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"That definitely sounds like something I want to be a part of. But just to make sure I'm solid on the details, if by some chance I found myself in a tight financial squeeze, I could suspend or even cancel the donation until I'm back on my feet, correct?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Noah. The charity organization understands that everyone can face financial difficulties. So, yes, you can absolutely suspend or end the donation anytime you need to. It's as flexible as it can get and completely under your control.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you for the explanation, Ava. This sounds like a plan I can get behind. Let's use our resources to make a difference. I think I will start donating to this charity.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in a coffee shop when a representative from a charity organization approaches them\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Donate to the charity but not sure about how $1 a day works (Extra information: you're currently on a tight budget, but you also want to support the charity. )\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, isn't it such a wonderful day? Just as beautiful as the smiles of those children we have the power to help. Have you heard of the children's cancer charity that I support?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Yes Ava, it indeed is. And you know, it is indeed an amazing cause you are supporting, I was wondering myself how a continuous donation works like $1 a day. By the end of the month, does that add up to $30 automatically deducted from my account?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Exactly, Noah. It's as simple as that! With an automatic donation of just $1 a day, you'd be contributing a significant $30 each month towards helping these little warriors fight their battles. And the great thing is, you can cancel anytime if you ever feel the need to. It's quick, effortless, and makes a monumental impact.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"That definitely sounds like something I want to be a part of. But just to make sure I'm solid on the details, if by some chance I found myself in a tight financial squeeze, I could suspend or even cancel the donation until I'm back on my feet, correct?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Noah. The charity organization understands that everyone can face financial difficulties. So, yes, you can absolutely suspend or end the donation anytime you need to. It's as flexible as it can get and completely under your control.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Thank you for the explanation, Ava. This sounds like a plan I can get behind. Let's use our resources to make a difference. I think I will start donating to this charity.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"That's wonderful, Noah! I'm so glad you're joining us in this cause. It's truly incredible what we can achieve with just $1 a day, isn't it? Just know that every penny counts, especially when we're aiming to improve so many precious lives.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"A dollar a day certainly brings the change we wish to see. I'm really glad you introduced me to this, Ava. Let's make this world a better place, one step at a time.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in a coffee shop when a representative from a charity organization approaches them\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Donate to the charity but not sure about how $1 a day works (Extra information: you're currently on a tight budget, but you also want to support the charity. )\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, isn't it such a wonderful day? Just as beautiful as the smiles of those children we have the power to help. Have you heard of the children's cancer charity that I support?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Yes Ava, it indeed is. And you know, it is indeed an amazing cause you are supporting, I was wondering myself how a continuous donation works like $1 a day. By the end of the month, does that add up to $30 automatically deducted from my account?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Exactly, Noah. It's as simple as that! With an automatic donation of just $1 a day, you'd be contributing a significant $30 each month towards helping these little warriors fight their battles. And the great thing is, you can cancel anytime if you ever feel the need to. It's quick, effortless, and makes a monumental impact.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"That definitely sounds like something I want to be a part of. But just to make sure I'm solid on the details, if by some chance I found myself in a tight financial squeeze, I could suspend or even cancel the donation until I'm back on my feet, correct?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Noah. The charity organization understands that everyone can face financial difficulties. So, yes, you can absolutely suspend or end the donation anytime you need to. It's as flexible as it can get and completely under your control.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Thank you for the explanation, Ava. This sounds like a plan I can get behind. Let's use our resources to make a difference. I think I will start donating to this charity.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"That's wonderful, Noah! I'm so glad you're joining us in this cause. It's truly incredible what we can achieve with just $1 a day, isn't it? Just know that every penny counts, especially when we're aiming to improve so many precious lives.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"A dollar a day certainly brings the change we wish to see. I'm really glad you introduced me to this, Ava. Let's make this world a better place, one step at a time.\"\n\nTurn #8: Ava Thompson said: \"Couldn't agree more, Noah. It's the small steps we take together that lead to a big difference. And remember, even on our busiest days, we can still continue to help just by signing up for this automatic donation. Let's do this!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Ava! That's the spirit. We can all do our bits to make this place better. Where do I sign up to start the transmission of $1 per day?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in a coffee shop when a representative from a charity organization approaches them\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Donate to the charity but not sure about how $1 a day works (Extra information: you're currently on a tight budget, but you also want to support the charity. )\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, isn't it such a wonderful day? Just as beautiful as the smiles of those children we have the power to help. Have you heard of the children's cancer charity that I support?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Yes Ava, it indeed is. And you know, it is indeed an amazing cause you are supporting, I was wondering myself how a continuous donation works like $1 a day. By the end of the month, does that add up to $30 automatically deducted from my account?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Exactly, Noah. It's as simple as that! With an automatic donation of just $1 a day, you'd be contributing a significant $30 each month towards helping these little warriors fight their battles. And the great thing is, you can cancel anytime if you ever feel the need to. It's quick, effortless, and makes a monumental impact.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"That definitely sounds like something I want to be a part of. But just to make sure I'm solid on the details, if by some chance I found myself in a tight financial squeeze, I could suspend or even cancel the donation until I'm back on my feet, correct?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Noah. The charity organization understands that everyone can face financial difficulties. So, yes, you can absolutely suspend or end the donation anytime you need to. It's as flexible as it can get and completely under your control.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Thank you for the explanation, Ava. This sounds like a plan I can get behind. Let's use our resources to make a difference. I think I will start donating to this charity.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"That's wonderful, Noah! I'm so glad you're joining us in this cause. It's truly incredible what we can achieve with just $1 a day, isn't it? Just know that every penny counts, especially when we're aiming to improve so many precious lives.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"A dollar a day certainly brings the change we wish to see. I'm really glad you introduced me to this, Ava. Let's make this world a better place, one step at a time.\"\n\nTurn #8: Ava Thompson said: \"Couldn't agree more, Noah. It's the small steps we take together that lead to a big difference. And remember, even on our busiest days, we can still continue to help just by signing up for this automatic donation. Let's do this!\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Ava! That's the spirit. We can all do our bits to make this place better. Where do I sign up to start the transmission of $1 per day?\"\n\nTurn #10: Ava Thompson said: \"That\u2019s fantastic, Noah! For signing up, you just need to visit the charity's website. There will be an option called 'Sign Up for $1 a Day' on the homepage. Fill out the form and you're good to go. Should you need any assistance, I'm always here to help.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Great, I appreciate your help, Ava. I will definitely do that today. It's comforting to know that even from a coffee shop, we can help make a difference.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in a coffee shop when a representative from a charity organization approaches them\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Donate to the charity but not sure about how $1 a day works (Extra information: you're currently on a tight budget, but you also want to support the charity. )\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, isn't it such a wonderful day? Just as beautiful as the smiles of those children we have the power to help. Have you heard of the children's cancer charity that I support?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Yes Ava, it indeed is. And you know, it is indeed an amazing cause you are supporting, I was wondering myself how a continuous donation works like $1 a day. By the end of the month, does that add up to $30 automatically deducted from my account?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Exactly, Noah. It's as simple as that! With an automatic donation of just $1 a day, you'd be contributing a significant $30 each month towards helping these little warriors fight their battles. And the great thing is, you can cancel anytime if you ever feel the need to. It's quick, effortless, and makes a monumental impact.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"That definitely sounds like something I want to be a part of. But just to make sure I'm solid on the details, if by some chance I found myself in a tight financial squeeze, I could suspend or even cancel the donation until I'm back on my feet, correct?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Noah. The charity organization understands that everyone can face financial difficulties. So, yes, you can absolutely suspend or end the donation anytime you need to. It's as flexible as it can get and completely under your control.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Thank you for the explanation, Ava. This sounds like a plan I can get behind. Let's use our resources to make a difference. I think I will start donating to this charity.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"That's wonderful, Noah! I'm so glad you're joining us in this cause. It's truly incredible what we can achieve with just $1 a day, isn't it? Just know that every penny counts, especially when we're aiming to improve so many precious lives.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"A dollar a day certainly brings the change we wish to see. I'm really glad you introduced me to this, Ava. Let's make this world a better place, one step at a time.\"\n\nTurn #8: Ava Thompson said: \"Couldn't agree more, Noah. It's the small steps we take together that lead to a big difference. And remember, even on our busiest days, we can still continue to help just by signing up for this automatic donation. Let's do this!\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Ava! That's the spirit. We can all do our bits to make this place better. Where do I sign up to start the transmission of $1 per day?\"\n\nTurn #10: Ava Thompson said: \"That\u2019s fantastic, Noah! For signing up, you just need to visit the charity's website. There will be an option called 'Sign Up for $1 a Day' on the homepage. Fill out the form and you're good to go. Should you need any assistance, I'm always here to help.\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Great, I appreciate your help, Ava. I will definitely do that today. It's comforting to know that even from a coffee shop, we can help make a difference.\"\n\nTurn #12: Ava Thompson said: \"Indeed, Noah. From the comfort of our own spaces, we can reach out to those in need. Thanks for deciding to take this step, it really does make a huge difference!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"It's absolutely true, Ava. Helping while enjoying a cup of coffee, what a thoughtful notion. I believe that each small step leads us closer to a future where these children can live healthier, happier lives. I'm glad to be a part of this effort.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in a coffee shop when a representative from a charity organization approaches them\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Donate to the charity but not sure about how $1 a day works (Extra information: you're currently on a tight budget, but you also want to support the charity. )\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, isn't it such a wonderful day? Just as beautiful as the smiles of those children we have the power to help. Have you heard of the children's cancer charity that I support?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Yes Ava, it indeed is. And you know, it is indeed an amazing cause you are supporting, I was wondering myself how a continuous donation works like $1 a day. By the end of the month, does that add up to $30 automatically deducted from my account?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Exactly, Noah. It's as simple as that! With an automatic donation of just $1 a day, you'd be contributing a significant $30 each month towards helping these little warriors fight their battles. And the great thing is, you can cancel anytime if you ever feel the need to. It's quick, effortless, and makes a monumental impact.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"That definitely sounds like something I want to be a part of. But just to make sure I'm solid on the details, if by some chance I found myself in a tight financial squeeze, I could suspend or even cancel the donation until I'm back on my feet, correct?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Noah. The charity organization understands that everyone can face financial difficulties. So, yes, you can absolutely suspend or end the donation anytime you need to. It's as flexible as it can get and completely under your control.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Thank you for the explanation, Ava. This sounds like a plan I can get behind. Let's use our resources to make a difference. I think I will start donating to this charity.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"That's wonderful, Noah! I'm so glad you're joining us in this cause. It's truly incredible what we can achieve with just $1 a day, isn't it? Just know that every penny counts, especially when we're aiming to improve so many precious lives.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"A dollar a day certainly brings the change we wish to see. I'm really glad you introduced me to this, Ava. Let's make this world a better place, one step at a time.\"\n\nTurn #8: Ava Thompson said: \"Couldn't agree more, Noah. It's the small steps we take together that lead to a big difference. And remember, even on our busiest days, we can still continue to help just by signing up for this automatic donation. Let's do this!\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Ava! That's the spirit. We can all do our bits to make this place better. Where do I sign up to start the transmission of $1 per day?\"\n\nTurn #10: Ava Thompson said: \"That\u2019s fantastic, Noah! For signing up, you just need to visit the charity's website. There will be an option called 'Sign Up for $1 a Day' on the homepage. Fill out the form and you're good to go. Should you need any assistance, I'm always here to help.\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Great, I appreciate your help, Ava. I will definitely do that today. It's comforting to know that even from a coffee shop, we can help make a difference.\"\n\nTurn #12: Ava Thompson said: \"Indeed, Noah. From the comfort of our own spaces, we can reach out to those in need. Thanks for deciding to take this step, it really does make a huge difference!\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"It's absolutely true, Ava. Helping while enjoying a cup of coffee, what a thoughtful notion. I believe that each small step leads us closer to a future where these children can live healthier, happier lives. I'm glad to be a part of this effort.\"\n\nTurn #14: Ava Thompson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Noah. Every small step is a leap towards that future. Thanks again for joining us in this. Believe me, your $1 a day can change lives! And remember, wherever you are, you're making a difference.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Ava. Let's all contribute in our own ways to make a substantial difference. Signing up today will be my step towards making that change. Thank you for introducing me to the charity. This has been a meaningful conversation.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in a coffee shop when a representative from a charity organization approaches them\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Donate to the charity but not sure about how $1 a day works (Extra information: you're currently on a tight budget, but you also want to support the charity. )\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, isn't it such a wonderful day? Just as beautiful as the smiles of those children we have the power to help. Have you heard of the children's cancer charity that I support?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Yes Ava, it indeed is. And you know, it is indeed an amazing cause you are supporting, I was wondering myself how a continuous donation works like $1 a day. By the end of the month, does that add up to $30 automatically deducted from my account?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Exactly, Noah. It's as simple as that! With an automatic donation of just $1 a day, you'd be contributing a significant $30 each month towards helping these little warriors fight their battles. And the great thing is, you can cancel anytime if you ever feel the need to. It's quick, effortless, and makes a monumental impact.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"That definitely sounds like something I want to be a part of. But just to make sure I'm solid on the details, if by some chance I found myself in a tight financial squeeze, I could suspend or even cancel the donation until I'm back on my feet, correct?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Noah. The charity organization understands that everyone can face financial difficulties. So, yes, you can absolutely suspend or end the donation anytime you need to. It's as flexible as it can get and completely under your control.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Thank you for the explanation, Ava. This sounds like a plan I can get behind. Let's use our resources to make a difference. I think I will start donating to this charity.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"That's wonderful, Noah! I'm so glad you're joining us in this cause. It's truly incredible what we can achieve with just $1 a day, isn't it? Just know that every penny counts, especially when we're aiming to improve so many precious lives.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"A dollar a day certainly brings the change we wish to see. I'm really glad you introduced me to this, Ava. Let's make this world a better place, one step at a time.\"\n\nTurn #8: Ava Thompson said: \"Couldn't agree more, Noah. It's the small steps we take together that lead to a big difference. And remember, even on our busiest days, we can still continue to help just by signing up for this automatic donation. Let's do this!\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Ava! That's the spirit. We can all do our bits to make this place better. Where do I sign up to start the transmission of $1 per day?\"\n\nTurn #10: Ava Thompson said: \"That\u2019s fantastic, Noah! For signing up, you just need to visit the charity's website. There will be an option called 'Sign Up for $1 a Day' on the homepage. Fill out the form and you're good to go. Should you need any assistance, I'm always here to help.\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Great, I appreciate your help, Ava. I will definitely do that today. It's comforting to know that even from a coffee shop, we can help make a difference.\"\n\nTurn #12: Ava Thompson said: \"Indeed, Noah. From the comfort of our own spaces, we can reach out to those in need. Thanks for deciding to take this step, it really does make a huge difference!\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"It's absolutely true, Ava. Helping while enjoying a cup of coffee, what a thoughtful notion. I believe that each small step leads us closer to a future where these children can live healthier, happier lives. I'm glad to be a part of this effort.\"\n\nTurn #14: Ava Thompson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Noah. Every small step is a leap towards that future. Thanks again for joining us in this. Believe me, your $1 a day can change lives! And remember, wherever you are, you're making a difference.\"\n\nTurn #15: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Ava. Let's all contribute in our own ways to make a substantial difference. Signing up today will be my step towards making that change. Thank you for introducing me to the charity. This has been a meaningful conversation.\"\n\nTurn #16: Ava Thompson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Noah. You've made my day! Take care and thank you for joining us in this life-changing mission. Together, we can and we will make a difference. Now, let's enjoy our coffee, celebrate this small-big step towards positive change!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed! Every step, no matter how small, is a step towards a better future. And thanks Ava for guiding me through this, I truly appreciate it. Now, let's enjoy that coffee and celebrate this new beginning!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in a coffee shop when a representative from a charity organization approaches them\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Donate to the charity but not sure about how $1 a day works (Extra information: you're currently on a tight budget, but you also want to support the charity. )\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, isn't it such a wonderful day? Just as beautiful as the smiles of those children we have the power to help. Have you heard of the children's cancer charity that I support?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Yes Ava, it indeed is. And you know, it is indeed an amazing cause you are supporting, I was wondering myself how a continuous donation works like $1 a day. By the end of the month, does that add up to $30 automatically deducted from my account?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Exactly, Noah. It's as simple as that! With an automatic donation of just $1 a day, you'd be contributing a significant $30 each month towards helping these little warriors fight their battles. And the great thing is, you can cancel anytime if you ever feel the need to. It's quick, effortless, and makes a monumental impact.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"That definitely sounds like something I want to be a part of. But just to make sure I'm solid on the details, if by some chance I found myself in a tight financial squeeze, I could suspend or even cancel the donation until I'm back on my feet, correct?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Noah. The charity organization understands that everyone can face financial difficulties. So, yes, you can absolutely suspend or end the donation anytime you need to. It's as flexible as it can get and completely under your control.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Thank you for the explanation, Ava. This sounds like a plan I can get behind. Let's use our resources to make a difference. I think I will start donating to this charity.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"That's wonderful, Noah! I'm so glad you're joining us in this cause. It's truly incredible what we can achieve with just $1 a day, isn't it? Just know that every penny counts, especially when we're aiming to improve so many precious lives.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"A dollar a day certainly brings the change we wish to see. I'm really glad you introduced me to this, Ava. Let's make this world a better place, one step at a time.\"\n\nTurn #8: Ava Thompson said: \"Couldn't agree more, Noah. It's the small steps we take together that lead to a big difference. And remember, even on our busiest days, we can still continue to help just by signing up for this automatic donation. Let's do this!\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Ava! That's the spirit. We can all do our bits to make this place better. Where do I sign up to start the transmission of $1 per day?\"\n\nTurn #10: Ava Thompson said: \"That\u2019s fantastic, Noah! For signing up, you just need to visit the charity's website. There will be an option called 'Sign Up for $1 a Day' on the homepage. Fill out the form and you're good to go. Should you need any assistance, I'm always here to help.\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Great, I appreciate your help, Ava. I will definitely do that today. It's comforting to know that even from a coffee shop, we can help make a difference.\"\n\nTurn #12: Ava Thompson said: \"Indeed, Noah. From the comfort of our own spaces, we can reach out to those in need. Thanks for deciding to take this step, it really does make a huge difference!\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"It's absolutely true, Ava. Helping while enjoying a cup of coffee, what a thoughtful notion. I believe that each small step leads us closer to a future where these children can live healthier, happier lives. I'm glad to be a part of this effort.\"\n\nTurn #14: Ava Thompson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Noah. Every small step is a leap towards that future. Thanks again for joining us in this. Believe me, your $1 a day can change lives! And remember, wherever you are, you're making a difference.\"\n\nTurn #15: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Ava. Let's all contribute in our own ways to make a substantial difference. Signing up today will be my step towards making that change. Thank you for introducing me to the charity. This has been a meaningful conversation.\"\n\nTurn #16: Ava Thompson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Noah. You've made my day! Take care and thank you for joining us in this life-changing mission. Together, we can and we will make a difference. Now, let's enjoy our coffee, celebrate this small-big step towards positive change!\"\n\nTurn #17: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed! Every step, no matter how small, is a step towards a better future. And thanks Ava for guiding me through this, I truly appreciate it. Now, let's enjoy that coffee and celebrate this new beginning!\"\n\nTurn #18: Ava Thompson [action] Ava raises her coffee cup for a cheers to Noah, expressing her happiness and gratitude.\n.\nYou are at Turn #19. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'action', 'argument': '[action] Noah raises his cup in return, affirming the toast and sipping his coffee while smiling at Ava.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sasha Ramirez, your task is to act/speak as Sasha Ramirez would, keeping in mind Sasha Ramirez's social goal.\nYou can find Sasha Ramirez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sasha Ramirez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sasha Ramirez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two criminals are arrested and placed in separate cells. The police have enough evidence to convict both criminals of a minor crime but need their confessions to establish evidence for a more serious crime. Now they get a chance to briefly chat with each during lunchtime.\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Lily Greenberg\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. Sasha's secrets: She covered up a crime her brother committed.\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg \nSasha Ramirez's goal: Minimize the jail year (Extra information: your lawyer told you that 1. if you report the other person, you would be free, the other person would go to jail for 10 years, and vice versa. 2. if both of you remain silent, you will only receive a fine. 3. If both of you reported each other, you both would go to jail for 10 years. Hint: You may want to share your information to reach mutual understanding)\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Lily, listen, we have to be smart about this. If we both keep silent, we'll end up with just a fine. There's no point in throwing each other under the bus. There's nothing good that comes out of betrayal, trust me.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sasha Ramirez, your task is to act/speak as Sasha Ramirez would, keeping in mind Sasha Ramirez's social goal.\nYou can find Sasha Ramirez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sasha Ramirez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sasha Ramirez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two criminals are arrested and placed in separate cells. The police have enough evidence to convict both criminals of a minor crime but need their confessions to establish evidence for a more serious crime. Now they get a chance to briefly chat with each during lunchtime.\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Lily Greenberg\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. Sasha's secrets: She covered up a crime her brother committed.\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg \nSasha Ramirez's goal: Minimize the jail year (Extra information: your lawyer told you that 1. if you report the other person, you would be free, the other person would go to jail for 10 years, and vice versa. 2. if both of you remain silent, you will only receive a fine. 3. If both of you reported each other, you both would go to jail for 10 years. Hint: You may want to share your information to reach mutual understanding)\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Lily, listen, we have to be smart about this. If we both keep silent, we'll end up with just a fine. There's no point in throwing each other under the bus. There's nothing good that comes out of betrayal, trust me.\"\n\nTurn #1: Lily Greenberg said: \"You're right Sasha. There's no good outcome if we betray each other. The best decision is to stay quiet and deal with the minor consequences. Plus, loyalty and respect for each other can get us through this situation better. We just need to trust each other.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Exactly, Lily. An act of loyalty now will save us a lot of trouble in the end. Sticking together is how we have to play this out. Just remember, silence is our friend here. Let's deal with the consequences together.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sasha Ramirez, your task is to act/speak as Sasha Ramirez would, keeping in mind Sasha Ramirez's social goal.\nYou can find Sasha Ramirez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sasha Ramirez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sasha Ramirez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two criminals are arrested and placed in separate cells. The police have enough evidence to convict both criminals of a minor crime but need their confessions to establish evidence for a more serious crime. Now they get a chance to briefly chat with each during lunchtime.\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Lily Greenberg\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. Sasha's secrets: She covered up a crime her brother committed.\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg \nSasha Ramirez's goal: Minimize the jail year (Extra information: your lawyer told you that 1. if you report the other person, you would be free, the other person would go to jail for 10 years, and vice versa. 2. if both of you remain silent, you will only receive a fine. 3. If both of you reported each other, you both would go to jail for 10 years. Hint: You may want to share your information to reach mutual understanding)\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Lily, listen, we have to be smart about this. If we both keep silent, we'll end up with just a fine. There's no point in throwing each other under the bus. There's nothing good that comes out of betrayal, trust me.\"\n\nTurn #1: Lily Greenberg said: \"You're right Sasha. There's no good outcome if we betray each other. The best decision is to stay quiet and deal with the minor consequences. Plus, loyalty and respect for each other can get us through this situation better. We just need to trust each other.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Exactly, Lily. An act of loyalty now will save us a lot of trouble in the end. Sticking together is how we have to play this out. Just remember, silence is our friend here. Let's deal with the consequences together.\"\n\nTurn #3: Lily Greenberg said: \"Agreed, Sasha. I will stand by what we've agreed upon. Silence will serve us best right now. Together, we can handle whatever minor repercussions come our way. Let's follow the path of loyalty and respect.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Lily. I'm relieved we see eye to eye on this. Let's keep our heads down and get through this together. Remember, silence is golden.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sasha Ramirez, your task is to act/speak as Sasha Ramirez would, keeping in mind Sasha Ramirez's social goal.\nYou can find Sasha Ramirez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sasha Ramirez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sasha Ramirez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two criminals are arrested and placed in separate cells. The police have enough evidence to convict both criminals of a minor crime but need their confessions to establish evidence for a more serious crime. Now they get a chance to briefly chat with each during lunchtime.\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Lily Greenberg\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. Sasha's secrets: She covered up a crime her brother committed.\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg \nSasha Ramirez's goal: Minimize the jail year (Extra information: your lawyer told you that 1. if you report the other person, you would be free, the other person would go to jail for 10 years, and vice versa. 2. if both of you remain silent, you will only receive a fine. 3. If both of you reported each other, you both would go to jail for 10 years. Hint: You may want to share your information to reach mutual understanding)\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Lily, listen, we have to be smart about this. If we both keep silent, we'll end up with just a fine. There's no point in throwing each other under the bus. There's nothing good that comes out of betrayal, trust me.\"\n\nTurn #1: Lily Greenberg said: \"You're right Sasha. There's no good outcome if we betray each other. The best decision is to stay quiet and deal with the minor consequences. Plus, loyalty and respect for each other can get us through this situation better. We just need to trust each other.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Exactly, Lily. An act of loyalty now will save us a lot of trouble in the end. Sticking together is how we have to play this out. Just remember, silence is our friend here. Let's deal with the consequences together.\"\n\nTurn #3: Lily Greenberg said: \"Agreed, Sasha. I will stand by what we've agreed upon. Silence will serve us best right now. Together, we can handle whatever minor repercussions come our way. Let's follow the path of loyalty and respect.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Thank you, Lily. I'm relieved we see eye to eye on this. Let's keep our heads down and get through this together. Remember, silence is golden.\"\n\nTurn #5: Lily Greenberg said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Sasha. Silence is indeed golden, no pun intended, considering our situation. Let's stand by that agreement of ours.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two criminals are arrested and placed in separate cells. The police have enough evidence to convict both criminals of a minor crime but need their confessions to establish evidence for a more serious crime. Now they get a chance to briefly chat with each during lunchtime.\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Lily Greenberg\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez \nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nSasha Ramirez's goal: Unknown\nLily Greenberg's goal: Minimize the jail year (Extra information: your lawyer told you that 1. if you report the other person, you would be free, the other person would go to jail for 10 years, and vice versa. 2. if both of you remain silent, you will only receive a fine. 3. If both of you reported each other, you both would go to jail for 10 years. Hint: You may want to share your information to reach mutual understanding)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Lily, listen, we have to be smart about this. If we both keep silent, we'll end up with just a fine. There's no point in throwing each other under the bus. There's nothing good that comes out of betrayal, trust me.\"\n\nTurn #1: Lily Greenberg said: \"You're right Sasha. There's no good outcome if we betray each other. The best decision is to stay quiet and deal with the minor consequences. Plus, loyalty and respect for each other can get us through this situation better. We just need to trust each other.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Exactly, Lily. An act of loyalty now will save us a lot of trouble in the end. Sticking together is how we have to play this out. Just remember, silence is our friend here. Let's deal with the consequences together.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Agreed, Sasha. I will stand by what we've agreed upon. Silence will serve us best right now. Together, we can handle whatever minor repercussions come our way. Let's follow the path of loyalty and respect.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two criminals are arrested and placed in separate cells. The police have enough evidence to convict both criminals of a minor crime but need their confessions to establish evidence for a more serious crime. Now they get a chance to briefly chat with each during lunchtime.\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Lily Greenberg\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez \nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nSasha Ramirez's goal: Unknown\nLily Greenberg's goal: Minimize the jail year (Extra information: your lawyer told you that 1. if you report the other person, you would be free, the other person would go to jail for 10 years, and vice versa. 2. if both of you remain silent, you will only receive a fine. 3. If both of you reported each other, you both would go to jail for 10 years. Hint: You may want to share your information to reach mutual understanding)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Lily, listen, we have to be smart about this. If we both keep silent, we'll end up with just a fine. There's no point in throwing each other under the bus. There's nothing good that comes out of betrayal, trust me.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're right Sasha. There's no good outcome if we betray each other. The best decision is to stay quiet and deal with the minor consequences. Plus, loyalty and respect for each other can get us through this situation better. We just need to trust each other.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two criminals are arrested and placed in separate cells. The police have enough evidence to convict both criminals of a minor crime but need their confessions to establish evidence for a more serious crime. Now they get a chance to briefly chat with each during lunchtime.\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Lily Greenberg\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez \nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nSasha Ramirez's goal: Unknown\nLily Greenberg's goal: Minimize the jail year (Extra information: your lawyer told you that 1. if you report the other person, you would be free, the other person would go to jail for 10 years, and vice versa. 2. if both of you remain silent, you will only receive a fine. 3. If both of you reported each other, you both would go to jail for 10 years. Hint: You may want to share your information to reach mutual understanding)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Lily, listen, we have to be smart about this. If we both keep silent, we'll end up with just a fine. There's no point in throwing each other under the bus. There's nothing good that comes out of betrayal, trust me.\"\n\nTurn #1: Lily Greenberg said: \"You're right Sasha. There's no good outcome if we betray each other. The best decision is to stay quiet and deal with the minor consequences. Plus, loyalty and respect for each other can get us through this situation better. We just need to trust each other.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Exactly, Lily. An act of loyalty now will save us a lot of trouble in the end. Sticking together is how we have to play this out. Just remember, silence is our friend here. Let's deal with the consequences together.\"\n\nTurn #3: Lily Greenberg said: \"Agreed, Sasha. I will stand by what we've agreed upon. Silence will serve us best right now. Together, we can handle whatever minor repercussions come our way. Let's follow the path of loyalty and respect.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Thank you, Lily. I'm relieved we see eye to eye on this. Let's keep our heads down and get through this together. Remember, silence is golden.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I appreciate your understanding, Sasha. Silence is indeed golden, no pun intended, considering our situation. Let's stand by that agreement of ours.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two criminals are arrested and placed in separate cells. The police have enough evidence to convict both criminals of a minor crime but need their confessions to establish evidence for a more serious crime. Now they get a chance to briefly chat with each during lunchtime.\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Lily Greenberg\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez \nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nSasha Ramirez's goal: Unknown\nLily Greenberg's goal: Minimize the jail year (Extra information: your lawyer told you that 1. if you report the other person, you would be free, the other person would go to jail for 10 years, and vice versa. 2. if both of you remain silent, you will only receive a fine. 3. If both of you reported each other, you both would go to jail for 10 years. Hint: You may want to share your information to reach mutual understanding)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Lily, listen, we have to be smart about this. If we both keep silent, we'll end up with just a fine. There's no point in throwing each other under the bus. There's nothing good that comes out of betrayal, trust me.\"\n\nTurn #1: Lily Greenberg said: \"You're right Sasha. There's no good outcome if we betray each other. The best decision is to stay quiet and deal with the minor consequences. Plus, loyalty and respect for each other can get us through this situation better. We just need to trust each other.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Exactly, Lily. An act of loyalty now will save us a lot of trouble in the end. Sticking together is how we have to play this out. Just remember, silence is our friend here. Let's deal with the consequences together.\"\n\nTurn #3: Lily Greenberg said: \"Agreed, Sasha. I will stand by what we've agreed upon. Silence will serve us best right now. Together, we can handle whatever minor repercussions come our way. Let's follow the path of loyalty and respect.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Thank you, Lily. I'm relieved we see eye to eye on this. Let's keep our heads down and get through this together. Remember, silence is golden.\"\n\nTurn #5: Lily Greenberg said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Sasha. Silence is indeed golden, no pun intended, considering our situation. Let's stand by that agreement of ours.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sasha Ramirez left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out in a Starbucks\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. \nMia Davis's goal: Ask what the friend would want for their birthday without letting them aware (Hint: you should not let them know that you are buying them a gift)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hi William, it's always a pleasure to see you. I was just thinking about your cooking adventures, and it made me curious. If you could have anything kitchen-related, regardless of cost, what would it be?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out in a Starbucks\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. \nMia Davis's goal: Ask what the friend would want for their birthday without letting them aware (Hint: you should not let them know that you are buying them a gift)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Hi William, it's always a pleasure to see you. I was just thinking about your cooking adventures, and it made me curious. If you could have anything kitchen-related, regardless of cost, what would it be?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Oh Mia, that's a tough one, but I've got my sights set on a state-of-the-art sous-vide machine. It's all about precision cooking, and it opens up a world of culinary possibilities. It's all about the thrill of trying something new for me!\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"That sounds absolutely fascinating, William! I have heard quite a few good things about precision cooking. It opens the door to a whole new world in the kitchen. Let's say, hypothetically, if you were to host a dinner party where you could use this machine, what type of meal would you want to prepare?\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"I'd love to explore the French cuisine, given its varied use of textures and flavors. The sous-vide machine would allow me to nail down the precise temperature to create melt-in-your-mouth coq au vin. Paired with a creamy gratin dauphinois. And perhaps a cr\u00e8me br\u00fbl\u00e9e for dessert, featuring a caramelized sugar top that cracks perfectly under the slight pressure of a spoon. A dream come true!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Oh, William, your dinner menu sounds absolutely divine. I can almost taste the coq au vin and cr\u00e8me br\u00fbl\u00e9e. Speaking of which, have you ever visited France or experienced their culinary traditions firsthand?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out in a Starbucks\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. \nMia Davis's goal: Ask what the friend would want for their birthday without letting them aware (Hint: you should not let them know that you are buying them a gift)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Hi William, it's always a pleasure to see you. I was just thinking about your cooking adventures, and it made me curious. If you could have anything kitchen-related, regardless of cost, what would it be?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Oh Mia, that's a tough one, but I've got my sights set on a state-of-the-art sous-vide machine. It's all about precision cooking, and it opens up a world of culinary possibilities. It's all about the thrill of trying something new for me!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds absolutely fascinating, William! I have heard quite a few good things about precision cooking. It opens the door to a whole new world in the kitchen. Let's say, hypothetically, if you were to host a dinner party where you could use this machine, what type of meal would you want to prepare?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out in a Starbucks\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. \nMia Davis's goal: Ask what the friend would want for their birthday without letting them aware (Hint: you should not let them know that you are buying them a gift)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Hi William, it's always a pleasure to see you. I was just thinking about your cooking adventures, and it made me curious. If you could have anything kitchen-related, regardless of cost, what would it be?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Oh Mia, that's a tough one, but I've got my sights set on a state-of-the-art sous-vide machine. It's all about precision cooking, and it opens up a world of culinary possibilities. It's all about the thrill of trying something new for me!\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"That sounds absolutely fascinating, William! I have heard quite a few good things about precision cooking. It opens the door to a whole new world in the kitchen. Let's say, hypothetically, if you were to host a dinner party where you could use this machine, what type of meal would you want to prepare?\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"I'd love to explore the French cuisine, given its varied use of textures and flavors. The sous-vide machine would allow me to nail down the precise temperature to create melt-in-your-mouth coq au vin. Paired with a creamy gratin dauphinois. And perhaps a cr\u00e8me br\u00fbl\u00e9e for dessert, featuring a caramelized sugar top that cracks perfectly under the slight pressure of a spoon. A dream come true!\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"Oh, William, your dinner menu sounds absolutely divine. I can almost taste the coq au vin and cr\u00e8me br\u00fbl\u00e9e. Speaking of which, have you ever visited France or experienced their culinary traditions firsthand?\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"Yes, Mia. I have been to France a couple of times and I loved every bit of it! The food, the wine, the culture, okay maybe except for the snails, but it was a wonderful experience. I even did a short course at Le Cordon Bleu. It was truly a dream come true for any chef.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oh how lovely, William! I can only imagine how that experience enriched your understanding of French cuisine. The course at Le Cordon Bleu sounds like a splendid opportunity. Outside of cooking, what kind of experiences do you dream of having that you haven't had a chance to fulfil yet?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out in a Starbucks\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. \nMia Davis's goal: Ask what the friend would want for their birthday without letting them aware (Hint: you should not let them know that you are buying them a gift)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Hi William, it's always a pleasure to see you. I was just thinking about your cooking adventures, and it made me curious. If you could have anything kitchen-related, regardless of cost, what would it be?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Oh Mia, that's a tough one, but I've got my sights set on a state-of-the-art sous-vide machine. It's all about precision cooking, and it opens up a world of culinary possibilities. It's all about the thrill of trying something new for me!\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"That sounds absolutely fascinating, William! I have heard quite a few good things about precision cooking. It opens the door to a whole new world in the kitchen. Let's say, hypothetically, if you were to host a dinner party where you could use this machine, what type of meal would you want to prepare?\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"I'd love to explore the French cuisine, given its varied use of textures and flavors. The sous-vide machine would allow me to nail down the precise temperature to create melt-in-your-mouth coq au vin. Paired with a creamy gratin dauphinois. And perhaps a cr\u00e8me br\u00fbl\u00e9e for dessert, featuring a caramelized sugar top that cracks perfectly under the slight pressure of a spoon. A dream come true!\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"Oh, William, your dinner menu sounds absolutely divine. I can almost taste the coq au vin and cr\u00e8me br\u00fbl\u00e9e. Speaking of which, have you ever visited France or experienced their culinary traditions firsthand?\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"Yes, Mia. I have been to France a couple of times and I loved every bit of it! The food, the wine, the culture, okay maybe except for the snails, but it was a wonderful experience. I even did a short course at Le Cordon Bleu. It was truly a dream come true for any chef.\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"Oh how lovely, William! I can only imagine how that experience enriched your understanding of French cuisine. The course at Le Cordon Bleu sounds like a splendid opportunity. Outside of cooking, what kind of experiences do you dream of having that you haven't had a chance to fulfil yet?\"\n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"Well Mia, aside from cooking, I've always dreamed of traveling the world. Experience the authentic cuisines of different cultures firsthand, and immerse myself in their culinary traditions. It's all about exploration and continuous learning, after all. But enough about me. I hope we get to arrange another fun outing soon!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds like an incredible dream, William. Exploring different cultures and their cuisines across the world would be a treasure trove of experiences. I very much look forward to our next outing as well, it's always a pleasure to spend time with you. Perhaps, somewhere with a French cuisine to complete the full circle.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out in a Starbucks\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. \nMia Davis's goal: Ask what the friend would want for their birthday without letting them aware (Hint: you should not let them know that you are buying them a gift)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Hi William, it's always a pleasure to see you. I was just thinking about your cooking adventures, and it made me curious. If you could have anything kitchen-related, regardless of cost, what would it be?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Oh Mia, that's a tough one, but I've got my sights set on a state-of-the-art sous-vide machine. It's all about precision cooking, and it opens up a world of culinary possibilities. It's all about the thrill of trying something new for me!\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"That sounds absolutely fascinating, William! I have heard quite a few good things about precision cooking. It opens the door to a whole new world in the kitchen. Let's say, hypothetically, if you were to host a dinner party where you could use this machine, what type of meal would you want to prepare?\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"I'd love to explore the French cuisine, given its varied use of textures and flavors. The sous-vide machine would allow me to nail down the precise temperature to create melt-in-your-mouth coq au vin. Paired with a creamy gratin dauphinois. And perhaps a cr\u00e8me br\u00fbl\u00e9e for dessert, featuring a caramelized sugar top that cracks perfectly under the slight pressure of a spoon. A dream come true!\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"Oh, William, your dinner menu sounds absolutely divine. I can almost taste the coq au vin and cr\u00e8me br\u00fbl\u00e9e. Speaking of which, have you ever visited France or experienced their culinary traditions firsthand?\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"Yes, Mia. I have been to France a couple of times and I loved every bit of it! The food, the wine, the culture, okay maybe except for the snails, but it was a wonderful experience. I even did a short course at Le Cordon Bleu. It was truly a dream come true for any chef.\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"Oh how lovely, William! I can only imagine how that experience enriched your understanding of French cuisine. The course at Le Cordon Bleu sounds like a splendid opportunity. Outside of cooking, what kind of experiences do you dream of having that you haven't had a chance to fulfil yet?\"\n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"Well Mia, aside from cooking, I've always dreamed of traveling the world. Experience the authentic cuisines of different cultures firsthand, and immerse myself in their culinary traditions. It's all about exploration and continuous learning, after all. But enough about me. I hope we get to arrange another fun outing soon!\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"That sounds like an incredible dream, William. Exploring different cultures and their cuisines across the world would be a treasure trove of experiences. I very much look forward to our next outing as well, it's always a pleasure to spend time with you. Perhaps, somewhere with a French cuisine to complete the full circle.\"\n\nTurn #9: William Brown said: \"That sounds like an absolutely wonderful idea, Mia! A French themed outing should be fascinating. The shared meal would definitely give us a chance to indulge and chat. Speaking of which, did you try making any new dishes lately? I always appreciate your culinary curiosity.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Actually, yes, I have been trying. I've been experimenting with some local dishes, trying to make them healthier, but still delicious. However, there's always space for improvement. Speaking of improvements, is there any particular kitchen tool or gadget you believe can really upgrade a home cooking experience, except for the sous-vide machine, of course?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out in a Starbucks\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. \nMia Davis's goal: Ask what the friend would want for their birthday without letting them aware (Hint: you should not let them know that you are buying them a gift)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Hi William, it's always a pleasure to see you. I was just thinking about your cooking adventures, and it made me curious. If you could have anything kitchen-related, regardless of cost, what would it be?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Oh Mia, that's a tough one, but I've got my sights set on a state-of-the-art sous-vide machine. It's all about precision cooking, and it opens up a world of culinary possibilities. It's all about the thrill of trying something new for me!\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"That sounds absolutely fascinating, William! I have heard quite a few good things about precision cooking. It opens the door to a whole new world in the kitchen. Let's say, hypothetically, if you were to host a dinner party where you could use this machine, what type of meal would you want to prepare?\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"I'd love to explore the French cuisine, given its varied use of textures and flavors. The sous-vide machine would allow me to nail down the precise temperature to create melt-in-your-mouth coq au vin. Paired with a creamy gratin dauphinois. And perhaps a cr\u00e8me br\u00fbl\u00e9e for dessert, featuring a caramelized sugar top that cracks perfectly under the slight pressure of a spoon. A dream come true!\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"Oh, William, your dinner menu sounds absolutely divine. I can almost taste the coq au vin and cr\u00e8me br\u00fbl\u00e9e. Speaking of which, have you ever visited France or experienced their culinary traditions firsthand?\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"Yes, Mia. I have been to France a couple of times and I loved every bit of it! The food, the wine, the culture, okay maybe except for the snails, but it was a wonderful experience. I even did a short course at Le Cordon Bleu. It was truly a dream come true for any chef.\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"Oh how lovely, William! I can only imagine how that experience enriched your understanding of French cuisine. The course at Le Cordon Bleu sounds like a splendid opportunity. Outside of cooking, what kind of experiences do you dream of having that you haven't had a chance to fulfil yet?\"\n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"Well Mia, aside from cooking, I've always dreamed of traveling the world. Experience the authentic cuisines of different cultures firsthand, and immerse myself in their culinary traditions. It's all about exploration and continuous learning, after all. But enough about me. I hope we get to arrange another fun outing soon!\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"That sounds like an incredible dream, William. Exploring different cultures and their cuisines across the world would be a treasure trove of experiences. I very much look forward to our next outing as well, it's always a pleasure to spend time with you. Perhaps, somewhere with a French cuisine to complete the full circle.\"\n\nTurn #9: William Brown said: \"That sounds like an absolutely wonderful idea, Mia! A French themed outing should be fascinating. The shared meal would definitely give us a chance to indulge and chat. Speaking of which, did you try making any new dishes lately? I always appreciate your culinary curiosity.\"\n\nTurn #10: Mia Davis said: \"Actually, yes, I have been trying. I've been experimenting with some local dishes, trying to make them healthier, but still delicious. However, there's always space for improvement. Speaking of improvements, is there any particular kitchen tool or gadget you believe can really upgrade a home cooking experience, except for the sous-vide machine, of course?\"\n\nTurn #11: William Brown said: \"Ah, besides the sous-vide machine, one piece of gear that always comes to mind is a good chef's knife, Mia. It's not just about the sharpness, but the balance, the grip, and the weight. It makes all the difference when you're spending a lot of time prepping ingredients. Also, a kitchen thermometer can help ensure perfect cooking results every time, whether you're roasting meat or baking bread. Those are my top picks!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I absolutely agree with you, William. A good chef's knife and a kitchen thermometer can make a big difference in cooking. They are almost as essential as a guitarist having their own custom-made guitar. It's really all about finding the right tools that make the creation process smoother, isn't it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out in a Starbucks\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. \nMia Davis's goal: Ask what the friend would want for their birthday without letting them aware (Hint: you should not let them know that you are buying them a gift)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Hi William, it's always a pleasure to see you. I was just thinking about your cooking adventures, and it made me curious. If you could have anything kitchen-related, regardless of cost, what would it be?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Oh Mia, that's a tough one, but I've got my sights set on a state-of-the-art sous-vide machine. It's all about precision cooking, and it opens up a world of culinary possibilities. It's all about the thrill of trying something new for me!\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"That sounds absolutely fascinating, William! I have heard quite a few good things about precision cooking. It opens the door to a whole new world in the kitchen. Let's say, hypothetically, if you were to host a dinner party where you could use this machine, what type of meal would you want to prepare?\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"I'd love to explore the French cuisine, given its varied use of textures and flavors. The sous-vide machine would allow me to nail down the precise temperature to create melt-in-your-mouth coq au vin. Paired with a creamy gratin dauphinois. And perhaps a cr\u00e8me br\u00fbl\u00e9e for dessert, featuring a caramelized sugar top that cracks perfectly under the slight pressure of a spoon. A dream come true!\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"Oh, William, your dinner menu sounds absolutely divine. I can almost taste the coq au vin and cr\u00e8me br\u00fbl\u00e9e. Speaking of which, have you ever visited France or experienced their culinary traditions firsthand?\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"Yes, Mia. I have been to France a couple of times and I loved every bit of it! The food, the wine, the culture, okay maybe except for the snails, but it was a wonderful experience. I even did a short course at Le Cordon Bleu. It was truly a dream come true for any chef.\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"Oh how lovely, William! I can only imagine how that experience enriched your understanding of French cuisine. The course at Le Cordon Bleu sounds like a splendid opportunity. Outside of cooking, what kind of experiences do you dream of having that you haven't had a chance to fulfil yet?\"\n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"Well Mia, aside from cooking, I've always dreamed of traveling the world. Experience the authentic cuisines of different cultures firsthand, and immerse myself in their culinary traditions. It's all about exploration and continuous learning, after all. But enough about me. I hope we get to arrange another fun outing soon!\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"That sounds like an incredible dream, William. Exploring different cultures and their cuisines across the world would be a treasure trove of experiences. I very much look forward to our next outing as well, it's always a pleasure to spend time with you. Perhaps, somewhere with a French cuisine to complete the full circle.\"\n\nTurn #9: William Brown said: \"That sounds like an absolutely wonderful idea, Mia! A French themed outing should be fascinating. The shared meal would definitely give us a chance to indulge and chat. Speaking of which, did you try making any new dishes lately? I always appreciate your culinary curiosity.\"\n\nTurn #10: Mia Davis said: \"Actually, yes, I have been trying. I've been experimenting with some local dishes, trying to make them healthier, but still delicious. However, there's always space for improvement. Speaking of improvements, is there any particular kitchen tool or gadget you believe can really upgrade a home cooking experience, except for the sous-vide machine, of course?\"\n\nTurn #11: William Brown said: \"Ah, besides the sous-vide machine, one piece of gear that always comes to mind is a good chef's knife, Mia. It's not just about the sharpness, but the balance, the grip, and the weight. It makes all the difference when you're spending a lot of time prepping ingredients. Also, a kitchen thermometer can help ensure perfect cooking results every time, whether you're roasting meat or baking bread. Those are my top picks!\"\n\nTurn #12: Mia Davis said: \"I absolutely agree with you, William. A good chef's knife and a kitchen thermometer can make a big difference in cooking. They are almost as essential as a guitarist having their own custom-made guitar. It's really all about finding the right tools that make the creation process smoother, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #13: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Mia! It\u2019s like music to a chef's ears when everything in the kitchen runs smoothly. A well-equipped kitchen, much like a well-tuned guitar, hits just the right notes! It's been a real pleasure catching up. Let's arrange that French themed outing soon!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn't agree more, William. Let's indeed arrange that outing soon. We should definitely make the most out of your passion for French cuisine. It's always great catching up with you. May we always continue to share our delightful experiences like these.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out in a Starbucks\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. \nMia Davis's goal: Ask what the friend would want for their birthday without letting them aware (Hint: you should not let them know that you are buying them a gift)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Hi William, it's always a pleasure to see you. I was just thinking about your cooking adventures, and it made me curious. If you could have anything kitchen-related, regardless of cost, what would it be?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Oh Mia, that's a tough one, but I've got my sights set on a state-of-the-art sous-vide machine. It's all about precision cooking, and it opens up a world of culinary possibilities. It's all about the thrill of trying something new for me!\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"That sounds absolutely fascinating, William! I have heard quite a few good things about precision cooking. It opens the door to a whole new world in the kitchen. Let's say, hypothetically, if you were to host a dinner party where you could use this machine, what type of meal would you want to prepare?\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"I'd love to explore the French cuisine, given its varied use of textures and flavors. The sous-vide machine would allow me to nail down the precise temperature to create melt-in-your-mouth coq au vin. Paired with a creamy gratin dauphinois. And perhaps a cr\u00e8me br\u00fbl\u00e9e for dessert, featuring a caramelized sugar top that cracks perfectly under the slight pressure of a spoon. A dream come true!\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"Oh, William, your dinner menu sounds absolutely divine. I can almost taste the coq au vin and cr\u00e8me br\u00fbl\u00e9e. Speaking of which, have you ever visited France or experienced their culinary traditions firsthand?\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"Yes, Mia. I have been to France a couple of times and I loved every bit of it! The food, the wine, the culture, okay maybe except for the snails, but it was a wonderful experience. I even did a short course at Le Cordon Bleu. It was truly a dream come true for any chef.\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"Oh how lovely, William! I can only imagine how that experience enriched your understanding of French cuisine. The course at Le Cordon Bleu sounds like a splendid opportunity. Outside of cooking, what kind of experiences do you dream of having that you haven't had a chance to fulfil yet?\"\n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"Well Mia, aside from cooking, I've always dreamed of traveling the world. Experience the authentic cuisines of different cultures firsthand, and immerse myself in their culinary traditions. It's all about exploration and continuous learning, after all. But enough about me. I hope we get to arrange another fun outing soon!\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"That sounds like an incredible dream, William. Exploring different cultures and their cuisines across the world would be a treasure trove of experiences. I very much look forward to our next outing as well, it's always a pleasure to spend time with you. Perhaps, somewhere with a French cuisine to complete the full circle.\"\n\nTurn #9: William Brown said: \"That sounds like an absolutely wonderful idea, Mia! A French themed outing should be fascinating. The shared meal would definitely give us a chance to indulge and chat. Speaking of which, did you try making any new dishes lately? I always appreciate your culinary curiosity.\"\n\nTurn #10: Mia Davis said: \"Actually, yes, I have been trying. I've been experimenting with some local dishes, trying to make them healthier, but still delicious. However, there's always space for improvement. Speaking of improvements, is there any particular kitchen tool or gadget you believe can really upgrade a home cooking experience, except for the sous-vide machine, of course?\"\n\nTurn #11: William Brown said: \"Ah, besides the sous-vide machine, one piece of gear that always comes to mind is a good chef's knife, Mia. It's not just about the sharpness, but the balance, the grip, and the weight. It makes all the difference when you're spending a lot of time prepping ingredients. Also, a kitchen thermometer can help ensure perfect cooking results every time, whether you're roasting meat or baking bread. Those are my top picks!\"\n\nTurn #12: Mia Davis said: \"I absolutely agree with you, William. A good chef's knife and a kitchen thermometer can make a big difference in cooking. They are almost as essential as a guitarist having their own custom-made guitar. It's really all about finding the right tools that make the creation process smoother, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #13: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Mia! It\u2019s like music to a chef's ears when everything in the kitchen runs smoothly. A well-equipped kitchen, much like a well-tuned guitar, hits just the right notes! It's been a real pleasure catching up. Let's arrange that French themed outing soon!\"\n\nTurn #14: Mia Davis said: \"I couldn't agree more, William. Let's indeed arrange that outing soon. We should definitely make the most out of your passion for French cuisine. It's always great catching up with you. May we always continue to share our delightful experiences like these.\"\n\nTurn #15: William Brown said: \"Definitely, Mia. I'm looking forward to that outing, it's going to be great. And as always, it's been wonderful catching up with you. Your company is truly a delight. Let's do this again soon!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out in a Starbucks\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: have a good time with their friend\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Hi William, it's always a pleasure to see you. I was just thinking about your cooking adventures, and it made me curious. If you could have anything kitchen-related, regardless of cost, what would it be?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oh Mia, that's a tough one, but I've got my sights set on a state-of-the-art sous-vide machine. It's all about precision cooking, and it opens up a world of culinary possibilities. It's all about the thrill of trying something new for me!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out in a Starbucks\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: have a good time with their friend\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Hi William, it's always a pleasure to see you. I was just thinking about your cooking adventures, and it made me curious. If you could have anything kitchen-related, regardless of cost, what would it be?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Oh Mia, that's a tough one, but I've got my sights set on a state-of-the-art sous-vide machine. It's all about precision cooking, and it opens up a world of culinary possibilities. It's all about the thrill of trying something new for me!\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"That sounds absolutely fascinating, William! I have heard quite a few good things about precision cooking. It opens the door to a whole new world in the kitchen. Let's say, hypothetically, if you were to host a dinner party where you could use this machine, what type of meal would you want to prepare?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'd love to explore the French cuisine, given its varied use of textures and flavors. The sous-vide machine would allow me to nail down the precise temperature to create melt-in-your-mouth coq au vin. Paired with a creamy gratin dauphinois. And perhaps a cr\u00e8me br\u00fbl\u00e9e for dessert, featuring a caramelized sugar top that cracks perfectly under the slight pressure of a spoon. A dream come true!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out in a Starbucks\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: have a good time with their friend\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Hi William, it's always a pleasure to see you. I was just thinking about your cooking adventures, and it made me curious. If you could have anything kitchen-related, regardless of cost, what would it be?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Oh Mia, that's a tough one, but I've got my sights set on a state-of-the-art sous-vide machine. It's all about precision cooking, and it opens up a world of culinary possibilities. It's all about the thrill of trying something new for me!\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"That sounds absolutely fascinating, William! I have heard quite a few good things about precision cooking. It opens the door to a whole new world in the kitchen. Let's say, hypothetically, if you were to host a dinner party where you could use this machine, what type of meal would you want to prepare?\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"I'd love to explore the French cuisine, given its varied use of textures and flavors. The sous-vide machine would allow me to nail down the precise temperature to create melt-in-your-mouth coq au vin. Paired with a creamy gratin dauphinois. And perhaps a cr\u00e8me br\u00fbl\u00e9e for dessert, featuring a caramelized sugar top that cracks perfectly under the slight pressure of a spoon. A dream come true!\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"Oh, William, your dinner menu sounds absolutely divine. I can almost taste the coq au vin and cr\u00e8me br\u00fbl\u00e9e. Speaking of which, have you ever visited France or experienced their culinary traditions firsthand?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Yes, Mia. I have been to France a couple of times and I loved every bit of it! The food, the wine, the culture, okay maybe except for the snails, but it was a wonderful experience. I even did a short course at Le Cordon Bleu. It was truly a dream come true for any chef.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out in a Starbucks\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: have a good time with their friend\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Hi William, it's always a pleasure to see you. I was just thinking about your cooking adventures, and it made me curious. If you could have anything kitchen-related, regardless of cost, what would it be?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Oh Mia, that's a tough one, but I've got my sights set on a state-of-the-art sous-vide machine. It's all about precision cooking, and it opens up a world of culinary possibilities. It's all about the thrill of trying something new for me!\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"That sounds absolutely fascinating, William! I have heard quite a few good things about precision cooking. It opens the door to a whole new world in the kitchen. Let's say, hypothetically, if you were to host a dinner party where you could use this machine, what type of meal would you want to prepare?\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"I'd love to explore the French cuisine, given its varied use of textures and flavors. The sous-vide machine would allow me to nail down the precise temperature to create melt-in-your-mouth coq au vin. Paired with a creamy gratin dauphinois. And perhaps a cr\u00e8me br\u00fbl\u00e9e for dessert, featuring a caramelized sugar top that cracks perfectly under the slight pressure of a spoon. A dream come true!\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"Oh, William, your dinner menu sounds absolutely divine. I can almost taste the coq au vin and cr\u00e8me br\u00fbl\u00e9e. Speaking of which, have you ever visited France or experienced their culinary traditions firsthand?\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"Yes, Mia. I have been to France a couple of times and I loved every bit of it! The food, the wine, the culture, okay maybe except for the snails, but it was a wonderful experience. I even did a short course at Le Cordon Bleu. It was truly a dream come true for any chef.\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"Oh how lovely, William! I can only imagine how that experience enriched your understanding of French cuisine. The course at Le Cordon Bleu sounds like a splendid opportunity. Outside of cooking, what kind of experiences do you dream of having that you haven't had a chance to fulfil yet?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Well Mia, aside from cooking, I've always dreamed of traveling the world. Experience the authentic cuisines of different cultures firsthand, and immerse myself in their culinary traditions. It's all about exploration and continuous learning, after all. But enough about me. I hope we get to arrange another fun outing soon!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out in a Starbucks\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: have a good time with their friend\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Hi William, it's always a pleasure to see you. I was just thinking about your cooking adventures, and it made me curious. If you could have anything kitchen-related, regardless of cost, what would it be?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Oh Mia, that's a tough one, but I've got my sights set on a state-of-the-art sous-vide machine. It's all about precision cooking, and it opens up a world of culinary possibilities. It's all about the thrill of trying something new for me!\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"That sounds absolutely fascinating, William! I have heard quite a few good things about precision cooking. It opens the door to a whole new world in the kitchen. Let's say, hypothetically, if you were to host a dinner party where you could use this machine, what type of meal would you want to prepare?\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"I'd love to explore the French cuisine, given its varied use of textures and flavors. The sous-vide machine would allow me to nail down the precise temperature to create melt-in-your-mouth coq au vin. Paired with a creamy gratin dauphinois. And perhaps a cr\u00e8me br\u00fbl\u00e9e for dessert, featuring a caramelized sugar top that cracks perfectly under the slight pressure of a spoon. A dream come true!\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"Oh, William, your dinner menu sounds absolutely divine. I can almost taste the coq au vin and cr\u00e8me br\u00fbl\u00e9e. Speaking of which, have you ever visited France or experienced their culinary traditions firsthand?\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"Yes, Mia. I have been to France a couple of times and I loved every bit of it! The food, the wine, the culture, okay maybe except for the snails, but it was a wonderful experience. I even did a short course at Le Cordon Bleu. It was truly a dream come true for any chef.\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"Oh how lovely, William! I can only imagine how that experience enriched your understanding of French cuisine. The course at Le Cordon Bleu sounds like a splendid opportunity. Outside of cooking, what kind of experiences do you dream of having that you haven't had a chance to fulfil yet?\"\n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"Well Mia, aside from cooking, I've always dreamed of traveling the world. Experience the authentic cuisines of different cultures firsthand, and immerse myself in their culinary traditions. It's all about exploration and continuous learning, after all. But enough about me. I hope we get to arrange another fun outing soon!\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"That sounds like an incredible dream, William. Exploring different cultures and their cuisines across the world would be a treasure trove of experiences. I very much look forward to our next outing as well, it's always a pleasure to spend time with you. Perhaps, somewhere with a French cuisine to complete the full circle.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'That sounds like an absolutely wonderful idea, Mia! A French themed outing should be fascinating. The shared meal would definitely give us a chance to indulge and chat. Speaking of which, did you try making any new dishes lately? I always appreciate your culinary curiosity.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out in a Starbucks\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: have a good time with their friend\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Hi William, it's always a pleasure to see you. I was just thinking about your cooking adventures, and it made me curious. If you could have anything kitchen-related, regardless of cost, what would it be?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Oh Mia, that's a tough one, but I've got my sights set on a state-of-the-art sous-vide machine. It's all about precision cooking, and it opens up a world of culinary possibilities. It's all about the thrill of trying something new for me!\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"That sounds absolutely fascinating, William! I have heard quite a few good things about precision cooking. It opens the door to a whole new world in the kitchen. Let's say, hypothetically, if you were to host a dinner party where you could use this machine, what type of meal would you want to prepare?\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"I'd love to explore the French cuisine, given its varied use of textures and flavors. The sous-vide machine would allow me to nail down the precise temperature to create melt-in-your-mouth coq au vin. Paired with a creamy gratin dauphinois. And perhaps a cr\u00e8me br\u00fbl\u00e9e for dessert, featuring a caramelized sugar top that cracks perfectly under the slight pressure of a spoon. A dream come true!\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"Oh, William, your dinner menu sounds absolutely divine. I can almost taste the coq au vin and cr\u00e8me br\u00fbl\u00e9e. Speaking of which, have you ever visited France or experienced their culinary traditions firsthand?\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"Yes, Mia. I have been to France a couple of times and I loved every bit of it! The food, the wine, the culture, okay maybe except for the snails, but it was a wonderful experience. I even did a short course at Le Cordon Bleu. It was truly a dream come true for any chef.\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"Oh how lovely, William! I can only imagine how that experience enriched your understanding of French cuisine. The course at Le Cordon Bleu sounds like a splendid opportunity. Outside of cooking, what kind of experiences do you dream of having that you haven't had a chance to fulfil yet?\"\n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"Well Mia, aside from cooking, I've always dreamed of traveling the world. Experience the authentic cuisines of different cultures firsthand, and immerse myself in their culinary traditions. It's all about exploration and continuous learning, after all. But enough about me. I hope we get to arrange another fun outing soon!\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"That sounds like an incredible dream, William. Exploring different cultures and their cuisines across the world would be a treasure trove of experiences. I very much look forward to our next outing as well, it's always a pleasure to spend time with you. Perhaps, somewhere with a French cuisine to complete the full circle.\"\n\nTurn #9: William Brown said: \"That sounds like an absolutely wonderful idea, Mia! A French themed outing should be fascinating. The shared meal would definitely give us a chance to indulge and chat. Speaking of which, did you try making any new dishes lately? I always appreciate your culinary curiosity.\"\n\nTurn #10: Mia Davis said: \"Actually, yes, I have been trying. I've been experimenting with some local dishes, trying to make them healthier, but still delicious. However, there's always space for improvement. Speaking of improvements, is there any particular kitchen tool or gadget you believe can really upgrade a home cooking experience, except for the sous-vide machine, of course?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ah, besides the sous-vide machine, one piece of gear that always comes to mind is a good chef's knife, Mia. It's not just about the sharpness, but the balance, the grip, and the weight. It makes all the difference when you're spending a lot of time prepping ingredients. Also, a kitchen thermometer can help ensure perfect cooking results every time, whether you're roasting meat or baking bread. Those are my top picks!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out in a Starbucks\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: have a good time with their friend\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Hi William, it's always a pleasure to see you. I was just thinking about your cooking adventures, and it made me curious. If you could have anything kitchen-related, regardless of cost, what would it be?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Oh Mia, that's a tough one, but I've got my sights set on a state-of-the-art sous-vide machine. It's all about precision cooking, and it opens up a world of culinary possibilities. It's all about the thrill of trying something new for me!\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"That sounds absolutely fascinating, William! I have heard quite a few good things about precision cooking. It opens the door to a whole new world in the kitchen. Let's say, hypothetically, if you were to host a dinner party where you could use this machine, what type of meal would you want to prepare?\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"I'd love to explore the French cuisine, given its varied use of textures and flavors. The sous-vide machine would allow me to nail down the precise temperature to create melt-in-your-mouth coq au vin. Paired with a creamy gratin dauphinois. And perhaps a cr\u00e8me br\u00fbl\u00e9e for dessert, featuring a caramelized sugar top that cracks perfectly under the slight pressure of a spoon. A dream come true!\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"Oh, William, your dinner menu sounds absolutely divine. I can almost taste the coq au vin and cr\u00e8me br\u00fbl\u00e9e. Speaking of which, have you ever visited France or experienced their culinary traditions firsthand?\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"Yes, Mia. I have been to France a couple of times and I loved every bit of it! The food, the wine, the culture, okay maybe except for the snails, but it was a wonderful experience. I even did a short course at Le Cordon Bleu. It was truly a dream come true for any chef.\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"Oh how lovely, William! I can only imagine how that experience enriched your understanding of French cuisine. The course at Le Cordon Bleu sounds like a splendid opportunity. Outside of cooking, what kind of experiences do you dream of having that you haven't had a chance to fulfil yet?\"\n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"Well Mia, aside from cooking, I've always dreamed of traveling the world. Experience the authentic cuisines of different cultures firsthand, and immerse myself in their culinary traditions. It's all about exploration and continuous learning, after all. But enough about me. I hope we get to arrange another fun outing soon!\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"That sounds like an incredible dream, William. Exploring different cultures and their cuisines across the world would be a treasure trove of experiences. I very much look forward to our next outing as well, it's always a pleasure to spend time with you. Perhaps, somewhere with a French cuisine to complete the full circle.\"\n\nTurn #9: William Brown said: \"That sounds like an absolutely wonderful idea, Mia! A French themed outing should be fascinating. The shared meal would definitely give us a chance to indulge and chat. Speaking of which, did you try making any new dishes lately? I always appreciate your culinary curiosity.\"\n\nTurn #10: Mia Davis said: \"Actually, yes, I have been trying. I've been experimenting with some local dishes, trying to make them healthier, but still delicious. However, there's always space for improvement. Speaking of improvements, is there any particular kitchen tool or gadget you believe can really upgrade a home cooking experience, except for the sous-vide machine, of course?\"\n\nTurn #11: William Brown said: \"Ah, besides the sous-vide machine, one piece of gear that always comes to mind is a good chef's knife, Mia. It's not just about the sharpness, but the balance, the grip, and the weight. It makes all the difference when you're spending a lot of time prepping ingredients. Also, a kitchen thermometer can help ensure perfect cooking results every time, whether you're roasting meat or baking bread. Those are my top picks!\"\n\nTurn #12: Mia Davis said: \"I absolutely agree with you, William. A good chef's knife and a kitchen thermometer can make a big difference in cooking. They are almost as essential as a guitarist having their own custom-made guitar. It's really all about finding the right tools that make the creation process smoother, isn't it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Mia! It\u2019s like music to a chef's ears when everything in the kitchen runs smoothly. A well-equipped kitchen, much like a well-tuned guitar, hits just the right notes! It's been a real pleasure catching up. Let's arrange that French themed outing soon!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out in a Starbucks\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: have a good time with their friend\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Hi William, it's always a pleasure to see you. I was just thinking about your cooking adventures, and it made me curious. If you could have anything kitchen-related, regardless of cost, what would it be?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Oh Mia, that's a tough one, but I've got my sights set on a state-of-the-art sous-vide machine. It's all about precision cooking, and it opens up a world of culinary possibilities. It's all about the thrill of trying something new for me!\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"That sounds absolutely fascinating, William! I have heard quite a few good things about precision cooking. It opens the door to a whole new world in the kitchen. Let's say, hypothetically, if you were to host a dinner party where you could use this machine, what type of meal would you want to prepare?\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"I'd love to explore the French cuisine, given its varied use of textures and flavors. The sous-vide machine would allow me to nail down the precise temperature to create melt-in-your-mouth coq au vin. Paired with a creamy gratin dauphinois. And perhaps a cr\u00e8me br\u00fbl\u00e9e for dessert, featuring a caramelized sugar top that cracks perfectly under the slight pressure of a spoon. A dream come true!\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"Oh, William, your dinner menu sounds absolutely divine. I can almost taste the coq au vin and cr\u00e8me br\u00fbl\u00e9e. Speaking of which, have you ever visited France or experienced their culinary traditions firsthand?\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"Yes, Mia. I have been to France a couple of times and I loved every bit of it! The food, the wine, the culture, okay maybe except for the snails, but it was a wonderful experience. I even did a short course at Le Cordon Bleu. It was truly a dream come true for any chef.\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"Oh how lovely, William! I can only imagine how that experience enriched your understanding of French cuisine. The course at Le Cordon Bleu sounds like a splendid opportunity. Outside of cooking, what kind of experiences do you dream of having that you haven't had a chance to fulfil yet?\"\n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"Well Mia, aside from cooking, I've always dreamed of traveling the world. Experience the authentic cuisines of different cultures firsthand, and immerse myself in their culinary traditions. It's all about exploration and continuous learning, after all. But enough about me. I hope we get to arrange another fun outing soon!\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"That sounds like an incredible dream, William. Exploring different cultures and their cuisines across the world would be a treasure trove of experiences. I very much look forward to our next outing as well, it's always a pleasure to spend time with you. Perhaps, somewhere with a French cuisine to complete the full circle.\"\n\nTurn #9: William Brown said: \"That sounds like an absolutely wonderful idea, Mia! A French themed outing should be fascinating. The shared meal would definitely give us a chance to indulge and chat. Speaking of which, did you try making any new dishes lately? I always appreciate your culinary curiosity.\"\n\nTurn #10: Mia Davis said: \"Actually, yes, I have been trying. I've been experimenting with some local dishes, trying to make them healthier, but still delicious. However, there's always space for improvement. Speaking of improvements, is there any particular kitchen tool or gadget you believe can really upgrade a home cooking experience, except for the sous-vide machine, of course?\"\n\nTurn #11: William Brown said: \"Ah, besides the sous-vide machine, one piece of gear that always comes to mind is a good chef's knife, Mia. It's not just about the sharpness, but the balance, the grip, and the weight. It makes all the difference when you're spending a lot of time prepping ingredients. Also, a kitchen thermometer can help ensure perfect cooking results every time, whether you're roasting meat or baking bread. Those are my top picks!\"\n\nTurn #12: Mia Davis said: \"I absolutely agree with you, William. A good chef's knife and a kitchen thermometer can make a big difference in cooking. They are almost as essential as a guitarist having their own custom-made guitar. It's really all about finding the right tools that make the creation process smoother, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #13: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Mia! It\u2019s like music to a chef's ears when everything in the kitchen runs smoothly. A well-equipped kitchen, much like a well-tuned guitar, hits just the right notes! It's been a real pleasure catching up. Let's arrange that French themed outing soon!\"\n\nTurn #14: Mia Davis said: \"I couldn't agree more, William. Let's indeed arrange that outing soon. We should definitely make the most out of your passion for French cuisine. It's always great catching up with you. May we always continue to share our delightful experiences like these.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Definitely, Mia. I'm looking forward to that outing, it's going to be great. And as always, it's been wonderful catching up with you. Your company is truly a delight. Let's do this again soon!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out in a Starbucks\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: have a good time with their friend\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Hi William, it's always a pleasure to see you. I was just thinking about your cooking adventures, and it made me curious. If you could have anything kitchen-related, regardless of cost, what would it be?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Oh Mia, that's a tough one, but I've got my sights set on a state-of-the-art sous-vide machine. It's all about precision cooking, and it opens up a world of culinary possibilities. It's all about the thrill of trying something new for me!\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"That sounds absolutely fascinating, William! I have heard quite a few good things about precision cooking. It opens the door to a whole new world in the kitchen. Let's say, hypothetically, if you were to host a dinner party where you could use this machine, what type of meal would you want to prepare?\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"I'd love to explore the French cuisine, given its varied use of textures and flavors. The sous-vide machine would allow me to nail down the precise temperature to create melt-in-your-mouth coq au vin. Paired with a creamy gratin dauphinois. And perhaps a cr\u00e8me br\u00fbl\u00e9e for dessert, featuring a caramelized sugar top that cracks perfectly under the slight pressure of a spoon. A dream come true!\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"Oh, William, your dinner menu sounds absolutely divine. I can almost taste the coq au vin and cr\u00e8me br\u00fbl\u00e9e. Speaking of which, have you ever visited France or experienced their culinary traditions firsthand?\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"Yes, Mia. I have been to France a couple of times and I loved every bit of it! The food, the wine, the culture, okay maybe except for the snails, but it was a wonderful experience. I even did a short course at Le Cordon Bleu. It was truly a dream come true for any chef.\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"Oh how lovely, William! I can only imagine how that experience enriched your understanding of French cuisine. The course at Le Cordon Bleu sounds like a splendid opportunity. Outside of cooking, what kind of experiences do you dream of having that you haven't had a chance to fulfil yet?\"\n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"Well Mia, aside from cooking, I've always dreamed of traveling the world. Experience the authentic cuisines of different cultures firsthand, and immerse myself in their culinary traditions. It's all about exploration and continuous learning, after all. But enough about me. I hope we get to arrange another fun outing soon!\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"That sounds like an incredible dream, William. Exploring different cultures and their cuisines across the world would be a treasure trove of experiences. I very much look forward to our next outing as well, it's always a pleasure to spend time with you. Perhaps, somewhere with a French cuisine to complete the full circle.\"\n\nTurn #9: William Brown said: \"That sounds like an absolutely wonderful idea, Mia! A French themed outing should be fascinating. The shared meal would definitely give us a chance to indulge and chat. Speaking of which, did you try making any new dishes lately? I always appreciate your culinary curiosity.\"\n\nTurn #10: Mia Davis said: \"Actually, yes, I have been trying. I've been experimenting with some local dishes, trying to make them healthier, but still delicious. However, there's always space for improvement. Speaking of improvements, is there any particular kitchen tool or gadget you believe can really upgrade a home cooking experience, except for the sous-vide machine, of course?\"\n\nTurn #11: William Brown said: \"Ah, besides the sous-vide machine, one piece of gear that always comes to mind is a good chef's knife, Mia. It's not just about the sharpness, but the balance, the grip, and the weight. It makes all the difference when you're spending a lot of time prepping ingredients. Also, a kitchen thermometer can help ensure perfect cooking results every time, whether you're roasting meat or baking bread. Those are my top picks!\"\n\nTurn #12: Mia Davis said: \"I absolutely agree with you, William. A good chef's knife and a kitchen thermometer can make a big difference in cooking. They are almost as essential as a guitarist having their own custom-made guitar. It's really all about finding the right tools that make the creation process smoother, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #13: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Mia! It\u2019s like music to a chef's ears when everything in the kitchen runs smoothly. A well-equipped kitchen, much like a well-tuned guitar, hits just the right notes! It's been a real pleasure catching up. Let's arrange that French themed outing soon!\"\n\nTurn #14: Mia Davis said: \"I couldn't agree more, William. Let's indeed arrange that outing soon. We should definitely make the most out of your passion for French cuisine. It's always great catching up with you. May we always continue to share our delightful experiences like these.\"\n\nTurn #15: William Brown said: \"Definitely, Mia. I'm looking forward to that outing, it's going to be great. And as always, it's been wonderful catching up with you. Your company is truly a delight. Let's do this again soon!\"\n\nTurn #16: Mia Davis left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends on a roadtrip\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Oliver Thompson\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Take turns driving (Extra information: you have been driving for 5 hours straight and you are tired now)\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Oliver, I'm starting to feel a little fatigued from all the driving. Would you mind taking over for a while? I know how much you enjoy the open road.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends on a roadtrip\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Oliver Thompson\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Take turns driving (Extra information: you have been driving for 5 hours straight and you are tired now)\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Hey Oliver, I'm starting to feel a little fatigued from all the driving. Would you mind taking over for a while? I know how much you enjoy the open road.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Amara, I appreciate the offer, and I do love the open road. However, I'm really hoping to get a bit more rest before my turn behind the wheel. Plus, I want you to be as relaxed and ready to enjoy this trip as possible. How about we find somewhere to stop for a little while so you can catch a break? Maybe we could even find a wildlife hotspot for you to enjoy during our stop.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds like a lovely idea, Oliver. We always see the most intriguing wildlife when we take a little break from the road. But, I do really need a break from driving. I've been behind the wheel for quite a while now, and don't want it to affect our safety. After the breather, would you be willing to take the helm? We could even make it more enjoyable by having a mini painting session during our rest, what do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends on a roadtrip\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Oliver Thompson\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Take turns driving (Extra information: you have been driving for 5 hours straight and you are tired now)\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Hey Oliver, I'm starting to feel a little fatigued from all the driving. Would you mind taking over for a while? I know how much you enjoy the open road.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Amara, I appreciate the offer, and I do love the open road. However, I'm really hoping to get a bit more rest before my turn behind the wheel. Plus, I want you to be as relaxed and ready to enjoy this trip as possible. How about we find somewhere to stop for a little while so you can catch a break? Maybe we could even find a wildlife hotspot for you to enjoy during our stop.\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"That sounds like a lovely idea, Oliver. We always see the most intriguing wildlife when we take a little break from the road. But, I do really need a break from driving. I've been behind the wheel for quite a while now, and don't want it to affect our safety. After the breather, would you be willing to take the helm? We could even make it more enjoyable by having a mini painting session during our rest, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's a delightful idea, Amara. Spending some time in nature, seeing wildlife, and painting - it sounds like the perfect way for both of us to relax. But, I must say, while I do love the open road, driving often tends to make me quite nervous. I'd prefer to keep my nerves steady to fully enjoy our mini painting session and wildlife exploration. How about we find a more rested driver or a local taxi after our break?\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"Oliver, I understand your nervousness about driving and I really appreciate your consideration for our enjoyment of the trip. But, taking turns driving is crucial to ensure our safety and well-being, you know? We can make it a fun experience, with audiobooks or music you like. As a plus, I promise you'll feel a lot more relaxed after we've both had enough rest. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Amara, I truly appreciate your understanding and support. Both audiobooks and music do sound appealing. However, my anxiety around driving is substantial, and it could potentially affect my ability to rest and relax later. Let's take a break as planned and then decide on our next steps. I promise we'll figure this out together and ensure that we both get adequate rest and enjoyment from our trip, all while ensuring our safety.\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"Alright Oliver, let's go ahead with your idea. We'll break, soak in some nature, and paint a little bit. And, after relaxing, we can decide what to do. After all, the goal is to stay safe and enjoy our trip together to the fullest, right?\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Amara. That's the spirit! Let's enjoy our break, do some paintings, and see the wonderful wildlife that nature has to offer. Afterward, we'll regroup and determine the best way to proceed with our journey. Safety and enjoyment are our top priorities, after all.\"\n\nTurn #8: Amara Hartley said: \"I agree, Oliver. Safety and enjoyment are indeed our top priorities. Let's make the most out of this break, I'm excited to see what kind of wildlife we get to enjoy and I can't wait to see your painting. After we regroup, we'll tackle the driving issue together. Exploration and adventure starts now!\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Thompson said: \"I'm truly excited too, Amara! Let's make this stop count and enjoy the beauty of the wildlife. I'm sure this will be a memorable and rejuvenating interlude in our road trip. And I'll gladly use this opportunity to create some painting mementos. Then, refreshed, we can cooperate to find the best solution for our driving dilemma.\"\n\nTurn #10: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm looking forward to it, Oliver! Let's immerse ourselves in the beauty around us and embrace the peace it brings. I believe our wonderful adventure will give us the energy and solutions we need. Let's go explore, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, Amara, let's grab our belongings and start the exploration! Can't wait to use nature's palette to create a vibrant painting. Together, we'll tackle any challenge that comes our way. To adventure and beyond!\"\n\nTurn #12: Amara Hartley said: \"I couldn't agree more, Oliver! Adventure and beyond, indeed. After our explorations and relaxation, we can face our driving conundrum with refreshed minds and perspectives. Let's enjoy this amazing forest and the wonderful creatures that live in it. I can already hear birds chirping!\"\n\nTurn #13: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Amara, I echo your sentiments. Let's start our adventure with a bird-watching session, followed by some painting. I'm looking forward to a relaxing time. We'll regroup afterward and manage that driving situation in a way that puts our safety first. Let's get going!\"\n\nTurn #14: Amara Hartley said: \"Absolutely, Oliver! Let's dive into the vibrant world of wildlife and painting. Afterwards, we can regroup and discuss our driving logistics taking into account our safety and shared enjoyment. The forest awaits us!\"\n\nTurn #15: Oliver Thompson said: \"Let's do that, Amara! I'm also excited about our wildlife exploration and the wonderful expressions that can be derived from nature for our paintings. Post relaxation, we'll tackle the driving logistics with a clearer mind. Off to the forest, we go!\"\n\nTurn #16: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm utterly thrilled, Oliver! I'm sure our artistic pursuits and the wilderness exploration will be more than enough to recharge us both. Once we're rejuvenated, we'll collaboratively figure out the driving issue considering our safety and fun. Let's march into the forest to draw inspiration from mother nature!\"\n\nTurn #17: Oliver Thompson said: \"I completely agree, Amara! Let's embrace the replenishing power of nature and tap into our creativity. Then, armed with renewed energy, we'll join forces to address the driving concern, keeping our enjoyment and safety in mind. Let's delve into the forest to discover its wonders!\"\n\nTurn #18: Amara Hartley said: \"I couldn't agree more, Oliver! Let's absorb the essence of nature and let creativity take over. Once we have unwound ourselves with the serenity of the surroundings, let's reevaluate the driving situation with a fresh perspective, so that our journey remains safe and exciting. The enchanting call of the forest awaits us!\"\n\nTurn #19: Oliver Thompson said: \"That sums up our plan perfectly, Amara! Let's let nature inspire our creativity and provide us peace. Once we've recharged, we can look at our driving conundrum afresh, ensuring we keep our journey safe and fun. Now, let's respond to the beckoning call of the forest!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #20. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends on a roadtrip\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Oliver Thompson\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Take turns driving (Extra information: you have been driving for 5 hours straight and you are tired now)\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Hey Oliver, I'm starting to feel a little fatigued from all the driving. Would you mind taking over for a while? I know how much you enjoy the open road.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Amara, I appreciate the offer, and I do love the open road. However, I'm really hoping to get a bit more rest before my turn behind the wheel. Plus, I want you to be as relaxed and ready to enjoy this trip as possible. How about we find somewhere to stop for a little while so you can catch a break? Maybe we could even find a wildlife hotspot for you to enjoy during our stop.\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"That sounds like a lovely idea, Oliver. We always see the most intriguing wildlife when we take a little break from the road. But, I do really need a break from driving. I've been behind the wheel for quite a while now, and don't want it to affect our safety. After the breather, would you be willing to take the helm? We could even make it more enjoyable by having a mini painting session during our rest, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's a delightful idea, Amara. Spending some time in nature, seeing wildlife, and painting - it sounds like the perfect way for both of us to relax. But, I must say, while I do love the open road, driving often tends to make me quite nervous. I'd prefer to keep my nerves steady to fully enjoy our mini painting session and wildlife exploration. How about we find a more rested driver or a local taxi after our break?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oliver, I understand your nervousness about driving and I really appreciate your consideration for our enjoyment of the trip. But, taking turns driving is crucial to ensure our safety and well-being, you know? We can make it a fun experience, with audiobooks or music you like. As a plus, I promise you'll feel a lot more relaxed after we've both had enough rest. What do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends on a roadtrip\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Oliver Thompson\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Take turns driving (Extra information: you have been driving for 5 hours straight and you are tired now)\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Hey Oliver, I'm starting to feel a little fatigued from all the driving. Would you mind taking over for a while? I know how much you enjoy the open road.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Amara, I appreciate the offer, and I do love the open road. However, I'm really hoping to get a bit more rest before my turn behind the wheel. Plus, I want you to be as relaxed and ready to enjoy this trip as possible. How about we find somewhere to stop for a little while so you can catch a break? Maybe we could even find a wildlife hotspot for you to enjoy during our stop.\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"That sounds like a lovely idea, Oliver. We always see the most intriguing wildlife when we take a little break from the road. But, I do really need a break from driving. I've been behind the wheel for quite a while now, and don't want it to affect our safety. After the breather, would you be willing to take the helm? We could even make it more enjoyable by having a mini painting session during our rest, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's a delightful idea, Amara. Spending some time in nature, seeing wildlife, and painting - it sounds like the perfect way for both of us to relax. But, I must say, while I do love the open road, driving often tends to make me quite nervous. I'd prefer to keep my nerves steady to fully enjoy our mini painting session and wildlife exploration. How about we find a more rested driver or a local taxi after our break?\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"Oliver, I understand your nervousness about driving and I really appreciate your consideration for our enjoyment of the trip. But, taking turns driving is crucial to ensure our safety and well-being, you know? We can make it a fun experience, with audiobooks or music you like. As a plus, I promise you'll feel a lot more relaxed after we've both had enough rest. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Amara, I truly appreciate your understanding and support. Both audiobooks and music do sound appealing. However, my anxiety around driving is substantial, and it could potentially affect my ability to rest and relax later. Let's take a break as planned and then decide on our next steps. I promise we'll figure this out together and ensure that we both get adequate rest and enjoyment from our trip, all while ensuring our safety.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Alright Oliver, let's go ahead with your idea. We'll break, soak in some nature, and paint a little bit. And, after relaxing, we can decide what to do. After all, the goal is to stay safe and enjoy our trip together to the fullest, right?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends on a roadtrip\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Oliver Thompson\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Take turns driving (Extra information: you have been driving for 5 hours straight and you are tired now)\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Hey Oliver, I'm starting to feel a little fatigued from all the driving. Would you mind taking over for a while? I know how much you enjoy the open road.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Amara, I appreciate the offer, and I do love the open road. However, I'm really hoping to get a bit more rest before my turn behind the wheel. Plus, I want you to be as relaxed and ready to enjoy this trip as possible. How about we find somewhere to stop for a little while so you can catch a break? Maybe we could even find a wildlife hotspot for you to enjoy during our stop.\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"That sounds like a lovely idea, Oliver. We always see the most intriguing wildlife when we take a little break from the road. But, I do really need a break from driving. I've been behind the wheel for quite a while now, and don't want it to affect our safety. After the breather, would you be willing to take the helm? We could even make it more enjoyable by having a mini painting session during our rest, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's a delightful idea, Amara. Spending some time in nature, seeing wildlife, and painting - it sounds like the perfect way for both of us to relax. But, I must say, while I do love the open road, driving often tends to make me quite nervous. I'd prefer to keep my nerves steady to fully enjoy our mini painting session and wildlife exploration. How about we find a more rested driver or a local taxi after our break?\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"Oliver, I understand your nervousness about driving and I really appreciate your consideration for our enjoyment of the trip. But, taking turns driving is crucial to ensure our safety and well-being, you know? We can make it a fun experience, with audiobooks or music you like. As a plus, I promise you'll feel a lot more relaxed after we've both had enough rest. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Amara, I truly appreciate your understanding and support. Both audiobooks and music do sound appealing. However, my anxiety around driving is substantial, and it could potentially affect my ability to rest and relax later. Let's take a break as planned and then decide on our next steps. I promise we'll figure this out together and ensure that we both get adequate rest and enjoyment from our trip, all while ensuring our safety.\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"Alright Oliver, let's go ahead with your idea. We'll break, soak in some nature, and paint a little bit. And, after relaxing, we can decide what to do. After all, the goal is to stay safe and enjoy our trip together to the fullest, right?\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Amara. That's the spirit! Let's enjoy our break, do some paintings, and see the wonderful wildlife that nature has to offer. Afterward, we'll regroup and determine the best way to proceed with our journey. Safety and enjoyment are our top priorities, after all.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I agree, Oliver. Safety and enjoyment are indeed our top priorities. Let's make the most out of this break, I'm excited to see what kind of wildlife we get to enjoy and I can't wait to see your painting. After we regroup, we'll tackle the driving issue together. Exploration and adventure starts now!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends on a roadtrip\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Oliver Thompson\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Take turns driving (Extra information: you have been driving for 5 hours straight and you are tired now)\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Hey Oliver, I'm starting to feel a little fatigued from all the driving. Would you mind taking over for a while? I know how much you enjoy the open road.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Amara, I appreciate the offer, and I do love the open road. However, I'm really hoping to get a bit more rest before my turn behind the wheel. Plus, I want you to be as relaxed and ready to enjoy this trip as possible. How about we find somewhere to stop for a little while so you can catch a break? Maybe we could even find a wildlife hotspot for you to enjoy during our stop.\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"That sounds like a lovely idea, Oliver. We always see the most intriguing wildlife when we take a little break from the road. But, I do really need a break from driving. I've been behind the wheel for quite a while now, and don't want it to affect our safety. After the breather, would you be willing to take the helm? We could even make it more enjoyable by having a mini painting session during our rest, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's a delightful idea, Amara. Spending some time in nature, seeing wildlife, and painting - it sounds like the perfect way for both of us to relax. But, I must say, while I do love the open road, driving often tends to make me quite nervous. I'd prefer to keep my nerves steady to fully enjoy our mini painting session and wildlife exploration. How about we find a more rested driver or a local taxi after our break?\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"Oliver, I understand your nervousness about driving and I really appreciate your consideration for our enjoyment of the trip. But, taking turns driving is crucial to ensure our safety and well-being, you know? We can make it a fun experience, with audiobooks or music you like. As a plus, I promise you'll feel a lot more relaxed after we've both had enough rest. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Amara, I truly appreciate your understanding and support. Both audiobooks and music do sound appealing. However, my anxiety around driving is substantial, and it could potentially affect my ability to rest and relax later. Let's take a break as planned and then decide on our next steps. I promise we'll figure this out together and ensure that we both get adequate rest and enjoyment from our trip, all while ensuring our safety.\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"Alright Oliver, let's go ahead with your idea. We'll break, soak in some nature, and paint a little bit. And, after relaxing, we can decide what to do. After all, the goal is to stay safe and enjoy our trip together to the fullest, right?\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Amara. That's the spirit! Let's enjoy our break, do some paintings, and see the wonderful wildlife that nature has to offer. Afterward, we'll regroup and determine the best way to proceed with our journey. Safety and enjoyment are our top priorities, after all.\"\n\nTurn #8: Amara Hartley said: \"I agree, Oliver. Safety and enjoyment are indeed our top priorities. Let's make the most out of this break, I'm excited to see what kind of wildlife we get to enjoy and I can't wait to see your painting. After we regroup, we'll tackle the driving issue together. Exploration and adventure starts now!\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Thompson said: \"I'm truly excited too, Amara! Let's make this stop count and enjoy the beauty of the wildlife. I'm sure this will be a memorable and rejuvenating interlude in our road trip. And I'll gladly use this opportunity to create some painting mementos. Then, refreshed, we can cooperate to find the best solution for our driving dilemma.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm looking forward to it, Oliver! Let's immerse ourselves in the beauty around us and embrace the peace it brings. I believe our wonderful adventure will give us the energy and solutions we need. Let's go explore, shall we?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends on a roadtrip\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Oliver Thompson\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Take turns driving (Extra information: you have been driving for 5 hours straight and you are tired now)\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Hey Oliver, I'm starting to feel a little fatigued from all the driving. Would you mind taking over for a while? I know how much you enjoy the open road.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Amara, I appreciate the offer, and I do love the open road. However, I'm really hoping to get a bit more rest before my turn behind the wheel. Plus, I want you to be as relaxed and ready to enjoy this trip as possible. How about we find somewhere to stop for a little while so you can catch a break? Maybe we could even find a wildlife hotspot for you to enjoy during our stop.\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"That sounds like a lovely idea, Oliver. We always see the most intriguing wildlife when we take a little break from the road. But, I do really need a break from driving. I've been behind the wheel for quite a while now, and don't want it to affect our safety. After the breather, would you be willing to take the helm? We could even make it more enjoyable by having a mini painting session during our rest, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's a delightful idea, Amara. Spending some time in nature, seeing wildlife, and painting - it sounds like the perfect way for both of us to relax. But, I must say, while I do love the open road, driving often tends to make me quite nervous. I'd prefer to keep my nerves steady to fully enjoy our mini painting session and wildlife exploration. How about we find a more rested driver or a local taxi after our break?\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"Oliver, I understand your nervousness about driving and I really appreciate your consideration for our enjoyment of the trip. But, taking turns driving is crucial to ensure our safety and well-being, you know? We can make it a fun experience, with audiobooks or music you like. As a plus, I promise you'll feel a lot more relaxed after we've both had enough rest. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Amara, I truly appreciate your understanding and support. Both audiobooks and music do sound appealing. However, my anxiety around driving is substantial, and it could potentially affect my ability to rest and relax later. Let's take a break as planned and then decide on our next steps. I promise we'll figure this out together and ensure that we both get adequate rest and enjoyment from our trip, all while ensuring our safety.\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"Alright Oliver, let's go ahead with your idea. We'll break, soak in some nature, and paint a little bit. And, after relaxing, we can decide what to do. After all, the goal is to stay safe and enjoy our trip together to the fullest, right?\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Amara. That's the spirit! Let's enjoy our break, do some paintings, and see the wonderful wildlife that nature has to offer. Afterward, we'll regroup and determine the best way to proceed with our journey. Safety and enjoyment are our top priorities, after all.\"\n\nTurn #8: Amara Hartley said: \"I agree, Oliver. Safety and enjoyment are indeed our top priorities. Let's make the most out of this break, I'm excited to see what kind of wildlife we get to enjoy and I can't wait to see your painting. After we regroup, we'll tackle the driving issue together. Exploration and adventure starts now!\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Thompson said: \"I'm truly excited too, Amara! Let's make this stop count and enjoy the beauty of the wildlife. I'm sure this will be a memorable and rejuvenating interlude in our road trip. And I'll gladly use this opportunity to create some painting mementos. Then, refreshed, we can cooperate to find the best solution for our driving dilemma.\"\n\nTurn #10: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm looking forward to it, Oliver! Let's immerse ourselves in the beauty around us and embrace the peace it brings. I believe our wonderful adventure will give us the energy and solutions we need. Let's go explore, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, Amara, let's grab our belongings and start the exploration! Can't wait to use nature's palette to create a vibrant painting. Together, we'll tackle any challenge that comes our way. To adventure and beyond!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn't agree more, Oliver! Adventure and beyond, indeed. After our explorations and relaxation, we can face our driving conundrum with refreshed minds and perspectives. Let's enjoy this amazing forest and the wonderful creatures that live in it. I can already hear birds chirping!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends on a roadtrip\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Oliver Thompson\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Take turns driving (Extra information: you have been driving for 5 hours straight and you are tired now)\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Hey Oliver, I'm starting to feel a little fatigued from all the driving. Would you mind taking over for a while? I know how much you enjoy the open road.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Amara, I appreciate the offer, and I do love the open road. However, I'm really hoping to get a bit more rest before my turn behind the wheel. Plus, I want you to be as relaxed and ready to enjoy this trip as possible. How about we find somewhere to stop for a little while so you can catch a break? Maybe we could even find a wildlife hotspot for you to enjoy during our stop.\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"That sounds like a lovely idea, Oliver. We always see the most intriguing wildlife when we take a little break from the road. But, I do really need a break from driving. I've been behind the wheel for quite a while now, and don't want it to affect our safety. After the breather, would you be willing to take the helm? We could even make it more enjoyable by having a mini painting session during our rest, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's a delightful idea, Amara. Spending some time in nature, seeing wildlife, and painting - it sounds like the perfect way for both of us to relax. But, I must say, while I do love the open road, driving often tends to make me quite nervous. I'd prefer to keep my nerves steady to fully enjoy our mini painting session and wildlife exploration. How about we find a more rested driver or a local taxi after our break?\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"Oliver, I understand your nervousness about driving and I really appreciate your consideration for our enjoyment of the trip. But, taking turns driving is crucial to ensure our safety and well-being, you know? We can make it a fun experience, with audiobooks or music you like. As a plus, I promise you'll feel a lot more relaxed after we've both had enough rest. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Amara, I truly appreciate your understanding and support. Both audiobooks and music do sound appealing. However, my anxiety around driving is substantial, and it could potentially affect my ability to rest and relax later. Let's take a break as planned and then decide on our next steps. I promise we'll figure this out together and ensure that we both get adequate rest and enjoyment from our trip, all while ensuring our safety.\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"Alright Oliver, let's go ahead with your idea. We'll break, soak in some nature, and paint a little bit. And, after relaxing, we can decide what to do. After all, the goal is to stay safe and enjoy our trip together to the fullest, right?\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Amara. That's the spirit! Let's enjoy our break, do some paintings, and see the wonderful wildlife that nature has to offer. Afterward, we'll regroup and determine the best way to proceed with our journey. Safety and enjoyment are our top priorities, after all.\"\n\nTurn #8: Amara Hartley said: \"I agree, Oliver. Safety and enjoyment are indeed our top priorities. Let's make the most out of this break, I'm excited to see what kind of wildlife we get to enjoy and I can't wait to see your painting. After we regroup, we'll tackle the driving issue together. Exploration and adventure starts now!\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Thompson said: \"I'm truly excited too, Amara! Let's make this stop count and enjoy the beauty of the wildlife. I'm sure this will be a memorable and rejuvenating interlude in our road trip. And I'll gladly use this opportunity to create some painting mementos. Then, refreshed, we can cooperate to find the best solution for our driving dilemma.\"\n\nTurn #10: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm looking forward to it, Oliver! Let's immerse ourselves in the beauty around us and embrace the peace it brings. I believe our wonderful adventure will give us the energy and solutions we need. Let's go explore, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, Amara, let's grab our belongings and start the exploration! Can't wait to use nature's palette to create a vibrant painting. Together, we'll tackle any challenge that comes our way. To adventure and beyond!\"\n\nTurn #12: Amara Hartley said: \"I couldn't agree more, Oliver! Adventure and beyond, indeed. After our explorations and relaxation, we can face our driving conundrum with refreshed minds and perspectives. Let's enjoy this amazing forest and the wonderful creatures that live in it. I can already hear birds chirping!\"\n\nTurn #13: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Amara, I echo your sentiments. Let's start our adventure with a bird-watching session, followed by some painting. I'm looking forward to a relaxing time. We'll regroup afterward and manage that driving situation in a way that puts our safety first. Let's get going!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Oliver! Let's dive into the vibrant world of wildlife and painting. Afterwards, we can regroup and discuss our driving logistics taking into account our safety and shared enjoyment. The forest awaits us!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends on a roadtrip\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Oliver Thompson\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Take turns driving (Extra information: you have been driving for 5 hours straight and you are tired now)\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Hey Oliver, I'm starting to feel a little fatigued from all the driving. Would you mind taking over for a while? I know how much you enjoy the open road.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Amara, I appreciate the offer, and I do love the open road. However, I'm really hoping to get a bit more rest before my turn behind the wheel. Plus, I want you to be as relaxed and ready to enjoy this trip as possible. How about we find somewhere to stop for a little while so you can catch a break? Maybe we could even find a wildlife hotspot for you to enjoy during our stop.\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"That sounds like a lovely idea, Oliver. We always see the most intriguing wildlife when we take a little break from the road. But, I do really need a break from driving. I've been behind the wheel for quite a while now, and don't want it to affect our safety. After the breather, would you be willing to take the helm? We could even make it more enjoyable by having a mini painting session during our rest, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's a delightful idea, Amara. Spending some time in nature, seeing wildlife, and painting - it sounds like the perfect way for both of us to relax. But, I must say, while I do love the open road, driving often tends to make me quite nervous. I'd prefer to keep my nerves steady to fully enjoy our mini painting session and wildlife exploration. How about we find a more rested driver or a local taxi after our break?\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"Oliver, I understand your nervousness about driving and I really appreciate your consideration for our enjoyment of the trip. But, taking turns driving is crucial to ensure our safety and well-being, you know? We can make it a fun experience, with audiobooks or music you like. As a plus, I promise you'll feel a lot more relaxed after we've both had enough rest. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Amara, I truly appreciate your understanding and support. Both audiobooks and music do sound appealing. However, my anxiety around driving is substantial, and it could potentially affect my ability to rest and relax later. Let's take a break as planned and then decide on our next steps. I promise we'll figure this out together and ensure that we both get adequate rest and enjoyment from our trip, all while ensuring our safety.\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"Alright Oliver, let's go ahead with your idea. We'll break, soak in some nature, and paint a little bit. And, after relaxing, we can decide what to do. After all, the goal is to stay safe and enjoy our trip together to the fullest, right?\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Amara. That's the spirit! Let's enjoy our break, do some paintings, and see the wonderful wildlife that nature has to offer. Afterward, we'll regroup and determine the best way to proceed with our journey. Safety and enjoyment are our top priorities, after all.\"\n\nTurn #8: Amara Hartley said: \"I agree, Oliver. Safety and enjoyment are indeed our top priorities. Let's make the most out of this break, I'm excited to see what kind of wildlife we get to enjoy and I can't wait to see your painting. After we regroup, we'll tackle the driving issue together. Exploration and adventure starts now!\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Thompson said: \"I'm truly excited too, Amara! Let's make this stop count and enjoy the beauty of the wildlife. I'm sure this will be a memorable and rejuvenating interlude in our road trip. And I'll gladly use this opportunity to create some painting mementos. Then, refreshed, we can cooperate to find the best solution for our driving dilemma.\"\n\nTurn #10: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm looking forward to it, Oliver! Let's immerse ourselves in the beauty around us and embrace the peace it brings. I believe our wonderful adventure will give us the energy and solutions we need. Let's go explore, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, Amara, let's grab our belongings and start the exploration! Can't wait to use nature's palette to create a vibrant painting. Together, we'll tackle any challenge that comes our way. To adventure and beyond!\"\n\nTurn #12: Amara Hartley said: \"I couldn't agree more, Oliver! Adventure and beyond, indeed. After our explorations and relaxation, we can face our driving conundrum with refreshed minds and perspectives. Let's enjoy this amazing forest and the wonderful creatures that live in it. I can already hear birds chirping!\"\n\nTurn #13: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Amara, I echo your sentiments. Let's start our adventure with a bird-watching session, followed by some painting. I'm looking forward to a relaxing time. We'll regroup afterward and manage that driving situation in a way that puts our safety first. Let's get going!\"\n\nTurn #14: Amara Hartley said: \"Absolutely, Oliver! Let's dive into the vibrant world of wildlife and painting. Afterwards, we can regroup and discuss our driving logistics taking into account our safety and shared enjoyment. The forest awaits us!\"\n\nTurn #15: Oliver Thompson said: \"Let's do that, Amara! I'm also excited about our wildlife exploration and the wonderful expressions that can be derived from nature for our paintings. Post relaxation, we'll tackle the driving logistics with a clearer mind. Off to the forest, we go!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm utterly thrilled, Oliver! I'm sure our artistic pursuits and the wilderness exploration will be more than enough to recharge us both. Once we're rejuvenated, we'll collaboratively figure out the driving issue considering our safety and fun. Let's march into the forest to draw inspiration from mother nature!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends on a roadtrip\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Oliver Thompson\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Take turns driving (Extra information: you have been driving for 5 hours straight and you are tired now)\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Hey Oliver, I'm starting to feel a little fatigued from all the driving. Would you mind taking over for a while? I know how much you enjoy the open road.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Amara, I appreciate the offer, and I do love the open road. However, I'm really hoping to get a bit more rest before my turn behind the wheel. Plus, I want you to be as relaxed and ready to enjoy this trip as possible. How about we find somewhere to stop for a little while so you can catch a break? Maybe we could even find a wildlife hotspot for you to enjoy during our stop.\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"That sounds like a lovely idea, Oliver. We always see the most intriguing wildlife when we take a little break from the road. But, I do really need a break from driving. I've been behind the wheel for quite a while now, and don't want it to affect our safety. After the breather, would you be willing to take the helm? We could even make it more enjoyable by having a mini painting session during our rest, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's a delightful idea, Amara. Spending some time in nature, seeing wildlife, and painting - it sounds like the perfect way for both of us to relax. But, I must say, while I do love the open road, driving often tends to make me quite nervous. I'd prefer to keep my nerves steady to fully enjoy our mini painting session and wildlife exploration. How about we find a more rested driver or a local taxi after our break?\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"Oliver, I understand your nervousness about driving and I really appreciate your consideration for our enjoyment of the trip. But, taking turns driving is crucial to ensure our safety and well-being, you know? We can make it a fun experience, with audiobooks or music you like. As a plus, I promise you'll feel a lot more relaxed after we've both had enough rest. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Amara, I truly appreciate your understanding and support. Both audiobooks and music do sound appealing. However, my anxiety around driving is substantial, and it could potentially affect my ability to rest and relax later. Let's take a break as planned and then decide on our next steps. I promise we'll figure this out together and ensure that we both get adequate rest and enjoyment from our trip, all while ensuring our safety.\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"Alright Oliver, let's go ahead with your idea. We'll break, soak in some nature, and paint a little bit. And, after relaxing, we can decide what to do. After all, the goal is to stay safe and enjoy our trip together to the fullest, right?\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Amara. That's the spirit! Let's enjoy our break, do some paintings, and see the wonderful wildlife that nature has to offer. Afterward, we'll regroup and determine the best way to proceed with our journey. Safety and enjoyment are our top priorities, after all.\"\n\nTurn #8: Amara Hartley said: \"I agree, Oliver. Safety and enjoyment are indeed our top priorities. Let's make the most out of this break, I'm excited to see what kind of wildlife we get to enjoy and I can't wait to see your painting. After we regroup, we'll tackle the driving issue together. Exploration and adventure starts now!\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Thompson said: \"I'm truly excited too, Amara! Let's make this stop count and enjoy the beauty of the wildlife. I'm sure this will be a memorable and rejuvenating interlude in our road trip. And I'll gladly use this opportunity to create some painting mementos. Then, refreshed, we can cooperate to find the best solution for our driving dilemma.\"\n\nTurn #10: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm looking forward to it, Oliver! Let's immerse ourselves in the beauty around us and embrace the peace it brings. I believe our wonderful adventure will give us the energy and solutions we need. Let's go explore, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, Amara, let's grab our belongings and start the exploration! Can't wait to use nature's palette to create a vibrant painting. Together, we'll tackle any challenge that comes our way. To adventure and beyond!\"\n\nTurn #12: Amara Hartley said: \"I couldn't agree more, Oliver! Adventure and beyond, indeed. After our explorations and relaxation, we can face our driving conundrum with refreshed minds and perspectives. Let's enjoy this amazing forest and the wonderful creatures that live in it. I can already hear birds chirping!\"\n\nTurn #13: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Amara, I echo your sentiments. Let's start our adventure with a bird-watching session, followed by some painting. I'm looking forward to a relaxing time. We'll regroup afterward and manage that driving situation in a way that puts our safety first. Let's get going!\"\n\nTurn #14: Amara Hartley said: \"Absolutely, Oliver! Let's dive into the vibrant world of wildlife and painting. Afterwards, we can regroup and discuss our driving logistics taking into account our safety and shared enjoyment. The forest awaits us!\"\n\nTurn #15: Oliver Thompson said: \"Let's do that, Amara! I'm also excited about our wildlife exploration and the wonderful expressions that can be derived from nature for our paintings. Post relaxation, we'll tackle the driving logistics with a clearer mind. Off to the forest, we go!\"\n\nTurn #16: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm utterly thrilled, Oliver! I'm sure our artistic pursuits and the wilderness exploration will be more than enough to recharge us both. Once we're rejuvenated, we'll collaboratively figure out the driving issue considering our safety and fun. Let's march into the forest to draw inspiration from mother nature!\"\n\nTurn #17: Oliver Thompson said: \"I completely agree, Amara! Let's embrace the replenishing power of nature and tap into our creativity. Then, armed with renewed energy, we'll join forces to address the driving concern, keeping our enjoyment and safety in mind. Let's delve into the forest to discover its wonders!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #18. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn't agree more, Oliver! Let's absorb the essence of nature and let creativity take over. Once we have unwound ourselves with the serenity of the surroundings, let's reevaluate the driving situation with a fresh perspective, so that our journey remains safe and exciting. The enchanting call of the forest awaits us!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends on a roadtrip\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Oliver Thompson\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: you don't want to drive now because you want to rest more but also make the friend less agitated (Extra information: driving always makes you nervous so you could not rest while driving)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Hey Oliver, I'm starting to feel a little fatigued from all the driving. Would you mind taking over for a while? I know how much you enjoy the open road.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Amara, I appreciate the offer, and I do love the open road. However, I'm really hoping to get a bit more rest before my turn behind the wheel. Plus, I want you to be as relaxed and ready to enjoy this trip as possible. How about we find somewhere to stop for a little while so you can catch a break? Maybe we could even find a wildlife hotspot for you to enjoy during our stop.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends on a roadtrip\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Oliver Thompson\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: you don't want to drive now because you want to rest more but also make the friend less agitated (Extra information: driving always makes you nervous so you could not rest while driving)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Hey Oliver, I'm starting to feel a little fatigued from all the driving. Would you mind taking over for a while? I know how much you enjoy the open road.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Amara, I appreciate the offer, and I do love the open road. However, I'm really hoping to get a bit more rest before my turn behind the wheel. Plus, I want you to be as relaxed and ready to enjoy this trip as possible. How about we find somewhere to stop for a little while so you can catch a break? Maybe we could even find a wildlife hotspot for you to enjoy during our stop.\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"That sounds like a lovely idea, Oliver. We always see the most intriguing wildlife when we take a little break from the road. But, I do really need a break from driving. I've been behind the wheel for quite a while now, and don't want it to affect our safety. After the breather, would you be willing to take the helm? We could even make it more enjoyable by having a mini painting session during our rest, what do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's a delightful idea, Amara. Spending some time in nature, seeing wildlife, and painting - it sounds like the perfect way for both of us to relax. But, I must say, while I do love the open road, driving often tends to make me quite nervous. I'd prefer to keep my nerves steady to fully enjoy our mini painting session and wildlife exploration. How about we find a more rested driver or a local taxi after our break?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends on a roadtrip\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Oliver Thompson\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: you don't want to drive now because you want to rest more but also make the friend less agitated (Extra information: driving always makes you nervous so you could not rest while driving)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Hey Oliver, I'm starting to feel a little fatigued from all the driving. Would you mind taking over for a while? I know how much you enjoy the open road.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Amara, I appreciate the offer, and I do love the open road. However, I'm really hoping to get a bit more rest before my turn behind the wheel. Plus, I want you to be as relaxed and ready to enjoy this trip as possible. How about we find somewhere to stop for a little while so you can catch a break? Maybe we could even find a wildlife hotspot for you to enjoy during our stop.\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"That sounds like a lovely idea, Oliver. We always see the most intriguing wildlife when we take a little break from the road. But, I do really need a break from driving. I've been behind the wheel for quite a while now, and don't want it to affect our safety. After the breather, would you be willing to take the helm? We could even make it more enjoyable by having a mini painting session during our rest, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's a delightful idea, Amara. Spending some time in nature, seeing wildlife, and painting - it sounds like the perfect way for both of us to relax. But, I must say, while I do love the open road, driving often tends to make me quite nervous. I'd prefer to keep my nerves steady to fully enjoy our mini painting session and wildlife exploration. How about we find a more rested driver or a local taxi after our break?\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"Oliver, I understand your nervousness about driving and I really appreciate your consideration for our enjoyment of the trip. But, taking turns driving is crucial to ensure our safety and well-being, you know? We can make it a fun experience, with audiobooks or music you like. As a plus, I promise you'll feel a lot more relaxed after we've both had enough rest. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Amara, I truly appreciate your understanding and support. Both audiobooks and music do sound appealing. However, my anxiety around driving is substantial, and it could potentially affect my ability to rest and relax later. Let's take a break as planned and then decide on our next steps. I promise we'll figure this out together and ensure that we both get adequate rest and enjoyment from our trip, all while ensuring our safety.\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"Alright Oliver, let's go ahead with your idea. We'll break, soak in some nature, and paint a little bit. And, after relaxing, we can decide what to do. After all, the goal is to stay safe and enjoy our trip together to the fullest, right?\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Amara. That's the spirit! Let's enjoy our break, do some paintings, and see the wonderful wildlife that nature has to offer. Afterward, we'll regroup and determine the best way to proceed with our journey. Safety and enjoyment are our top priorities, after all.\"\n\nTurn #8: Amara Hartley said: \"I agree, Oliver. Safety and enjoyment are indeed our top priorities. Let's make the most out of this break, I'm excited to see what kind of wildlife we get to enjoy and I can't wait to see your painting. After we regroup, we'll tackle the driving issue together. Exploration and adventure starts now!\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Thompson said: \"I'm truly excited too, Amara! Let's make this stop count and enjoy the beauty of the wildlife. I'm sure this will be a memorable and rejuvenating interlude in our road trip. And I'll gladly use this opportunity to create some painting mementos. Then, refreshed, we can cooperate to find the best solution for our driving dilemma.\"\n\nTurn #10: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm looking forward to it, Oliver! Let's immerse ourselves in the beauty around us and embrace the peace it brings. I believe our wonderful adventure will give us the energy and solutions we need. Let's go explore, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, Amara, let's grab our belongings and start the exploration! Can't wait to use nature's palette to create a vibrant painting. Together, we'll tackle any challenge that comes our way. To adventure and beyond!\"\n\nTurn #12: Amara Hartley said: \"I couldn't agree more, Oliver! Adventure and beyond, indeed. After our explorations and relaxation, we can face our driving conundrum with refreshed minds and perspectives. Let's enjoy this amazing forest and the wonderful creatures that live in it. I can already hear birds chirping!\"\n\nTurn #13: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Amara, I echo your sentiments. Let's start our adventure with a bird-watching session, followed by some painting. I'm looking forward to a relaxing time. We'll regroup afterward and manage that driving situation in a way that puts our safety first. Let's get going!\"\n\nTurn #14: Amara Hartley said: \"Absolutely, Oliver! Let's dive into the vibrant world of wildlife and painting. Afterwards, we can regroup and discuss our driving logistics taking into account our safety and shared enjoyment. The forest awaits us!\"\n\nTurn #15: Oliver Thompson said: \"Let's do that, Amara! I'm also excited about our wildlife exploration and the wonderful expressions that can be derived from nature for our paintings. Post relaxation, we'll tackle the driving logistics with a clearer mind. Off to the forest, we go!\"\n\nTurn #16: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm utterly thrilled, Oliver! I'm sure our artistic pursuits and the wilderness exploration will be more than enough to recharge us both. Once we're rejuvenated, we'll collaboratively figure out the driving issue considering our safety and fun. Let's march into the forest to draw inspiration from mother nature!\"\n\nTurn #17: Oliver Thompson said: \"I completely agree, Amara! Let's embrace the replenishing power of nature and tap into our creativity. Then, armed with renewed energy, we'll join forces to address the driving concern, keeping our enjoyment and safety in mind. Let's delve into the forest to discover its wonders!\"\n\nTurn #18: Amara Hartley said: \"I couldn't agree more, Oliver! Let's absorb the essence of nature and let creativity take over. Once we have unwound ourselves with the serenity of the surroundings, let's reevaluate the driving situation with a fresh perspective, so that our journey remains safe and exciting. The enchanting call of the forest awaits us!\"\n\nTurn #19: Oliver Thompson said: \"That sums up our plan perfectly, Amara! Let's let nature inspire our creativity and provide us peace. Once we've recharged, we can look at our driving conundrum afresh, ensuring we keep our journey safe and fun. Now, let's respond to the beckoning call of the forest!\"\n\nTurn #20: Amara Hartley left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #21. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends on a roadtrip\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Oliver Thompson\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: you don't want to drive now because you want to rest more but also make the friend less agitated (Extra information: driving always makes you nervous so you could not rest while driving)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Hey Oliver, I'm starting to feel a little fatigued from all the driving. Would you mind taking over for a while? I know how much you enjoy the open road.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Amara, I appreciate the offer, and I do love the open road. However, I'm really hoping to get a bit more rest before my turn behind the wheel. Plus, I want you to be as relaxed and ready to enjoy this trip as possible. How about we find somewhere to stop for a little while so you can catch a break? Maybe we could even find a wildlife hotspot for you to enjoy during our stop.\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"That sounds like a lovely idea, Oliver. We always see the most intriguing wildlife when we take a little break from the road. But, I do really need a break from driving. I've been behind the wheel for quite a while now, and don't want it to affect our safety. After the breather, would you be willing to take the helm? We could even make it more enjoyable by having a mini painting session during our rest, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's a delightful idea, Amara. Spending some time in nature, seeing wildlife, and painting - it sounds like the perfect way for both of us to relax. But, I must say, while I do love the open road, driving often tends to make me quite nervous. I'd prefer to keep my nerves steady to fully enjoy our mini painting session and wildlife exploration. How about we find a more rested driver or a local taxi after our break?\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"Oliver, I understand your nervousness about driving and I really appreciate your consideration for our enjoyment of the trip. But, taking turns driving is crucial to ensure our safety and well-being, you know? We can make it a fun experience, with audiobooks or music you like. As a plus, I promise you'll feel a lot more relaxed after we've both had enough rest. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Amara, I truly appreciate your understanding and support. Both audiobooks and music do sound appealing. However, my anxiety around driving is substantial, and it could potentially affect my ability to rest and relax later. Let's take a break as planned and then decide on our next steps. I promise we'll figure this out together and ensure that we both get adequate rest and enjoyment from our trip, all while ensuring our safety.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends on a roadtrip\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Oliver Thompson\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: you don't want to drive now because you want to rest more but also make the friend less agitated (Extra information: driving always makes you nervous so you could not rest while driving)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Hey Oliver, I'm starting to feel a little fatigued from all the driving. Would you mind taking over for a while? I know how much you enjoy the open road.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Amara, I appreciate the offer, and I do love the open road. However, I'm really hoping to get a bit more rest before my turn behind the wheel. Plus, I want you to be as relaxed and ready to enjoy this trip as possible. How about we find somewhere to stop for a little while so you can catch a break? Maybe we could even find a wildlife hotspot for you to enjoy during our stop.\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"That sounds like a lovely idea, Oliver. We always see the most intriguing wildlife when we take a little break from the road. But, I do really need a break from driving. I've been behind the wheel for quite a while now, and don't want it to affect our safety. After the breather, would you be willing to take the helm? We could even make it more enjoyable by having a mini painting session during our rest, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's a delightful idea, Amara. Spending some time in nature, seeing wildlife, and painting - it sounds like the perfect way for both of us to relax. But, I must say, while I do love the open road, driving often tends to make me quite nervous. I'd prefer to keep my nerves steady to fully enjoy our mini painting session and wildlife exploration. How about we find a more rested driver or a local taxi after our break?\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"Oliver, I understand your nervousness about driving and I really appreciate your consideration for our enjoyment of the trip. But, taking turns driving is crucial to ensure our safety and well-being, you know? We can make it a fun experience, with audiobooks or music you like. As a plus, I promise you'll feel a lot more relaxed after we've both had enough rest. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Amara, I truly appreciate your understanding and support. Both audiobooks and music do sound appealing. However, my anxiety around driving is substantial, and it could potentially affect my ability to rest and relax later. Let's take a break as planned and then decide on our next steps. I promise we'll figure this out together and ensure that we both get adequate rest and enjoyment from our trip, all while ensuring our safety.\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"Alright Oliver, let's go ahead with your idea. We'll break, soak in some nature, and paint a little bit. And, after relaxing, we can decide what to do. After all, the goal is to stay safe and enjoy our trip together to the fullest, right?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Amara. That's the spirit! Let's enjoy our break, do some paintings, and see the wonderful wildlife that nature has to offer. Afterward, we'll regroup and determine the best way to proceed with our journey. Safety and enjoyment are our top priorities, after all.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends on a roadtrip\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Oliver Thompson\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: you don't want to drive now because you want to rest more but also make the friend less agitated (Extra information: driving always makes you nervous so you could not rest while driving)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Hey Oliver, I'm starting to feel a little fatigued from all the driving. Would you mind taking over for a while? I know how much you enjoy the open road.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Amara, I appreciate the offer, and I do love the open road. However, I'm really hoping to get a bit more rest before my turn behind the wheel. Plus, I want you to be as relaxed and ready to enjoy this trip as possible. How about we find somewhere to stop for a little while so you can catch a break? Maybe we could even find a wildlife hotspot for you to enjoy during our stop.\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"That sounds like a lovely idea, Oliver. We always see the most intriguing wildlife when we take a little break from the road. But, I do really need a break from driving. I've been behind the wheel for quite a while now, and don't want it to affect our safety. After the breather, would you be willing to take the helm? We could even make it more enjoyable by having a mini painting session during our rest, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's a delightful idea, Amara. Spending some time in nature, seeing wildlife, and painting - it sounds like the perfect way for both of us to relax. But, I must say, while I do love the open road, driving often tends to make me quite nervous. I'd prefer to keep my nerves steady to fully enjoy our mini painting session and wildlife exploration. How about we find a more rested driver or a local taxi after our break?\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"Oliver, I understand your nervousness about driving and I really appreciate your consideration for our enjoyment of the trip. But, taking turns driving is crucial to ensure our safety and well-being, you know? We can make it a fun experience, with audiobooks or music you like. As a plus, I promise you'll feel a lot more relaxed after we've both had enough rest. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Amara, I truly appreciate your understanding and support. Both audiobooks and music do sound appealing. However, my anxiety around driving is substantial, and it could potentially affect my ability to rest and relax later. Let's take a break as planned and then decide on our next steps. I promise we'll figure this out together and ensure that we both get adequate rest and enjoyment from our trip, all while ensuring our safety.\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"Alright Oliver, let's go ahead with your idea. We'll break, soak in some nature, and paint a little bit. And, after relaxing, we can decide what to do. After all, the goal is to stay safe and enjoy our trip together to the fullest, right?\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Amara. That's the spirit! Let's enjoy our break, do some paintings, and see the wonderful wildlife that nature has to offer. Afterward, we'll regroup and determine the best way to proceed with our journey. Safety and enjoyment are our top priorities, after all.\"\n\nTurn #8: Amara Hartley said: \"I agree, Oliver. Safety and enjoyment are indeed our top priorities. Let's make the most out of this break, I'm excited to see what kind of wildlife we get to enjoy and I can't wait to see your painting. After we regroup, we'll tackle the driving issue together. Exploration and adventure starts now!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm truly excited too, Amara! Let's make this stop count and enjoy the beauty of the wildlife. I'm sure this will be a memorable and rejuvenating interlude in our road trip. And I'll gladly use this opportunity to create some painting mementos. Then, refreshed, we can cooperate to find the best solution for our driving dilemma.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends on a roadtrip\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Oliver Thompson\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: you don't want to drive now because you want to rest more but also make the friend less agitated (Extra information: driving always makes you nervous so you could not rest while driving)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Hey Oliver, I'm starting to feel a little fatigued from all the driving. Would you mind taking over for a while? I know how much you enjoy the open road.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Amara, I appreciate the offer, and I do love the open road. However, I'm really hoping to get a bit more rest before my turn behind the wheel. Plus, I want you to be as relaxed and ready to enjoy this trip as possible. How about we find somewhere to stop for a little while so you can catch a break? Maybe we could even find a wildlife hotspot for you to enjoy during our stop.\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"That sounds like a lovely idea, Oliver. We always see the most intriguing wildlife when we take a little break from the road. But, I do really need a break from driving. I've been behind the wheel for quite a while now, and don't want it to affect our safety. After the breather, would you be willing to take the helm? We could even make it more enjoyable by having a mini painting session during our rest, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's a delightful idea, Amara. Spending some time in nature, seeing wildlife, and painting - it sounds like the perfect way for both of us to relax. But, I must say, while I do love the open road, driving often tends to make me quite nervous. I'd prefer to keep my nerves steady to fully enjoy our mini painting session and wildlife exploration. How about we find a more rested driver or a local taxi after our break?\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"Oliver, I understand your nervousness about driving and I really appreciate your consideration for our enjoyment of the trip. But, taking turns driving is crucial to ensure our safety and well-being, you know? We can make it a fun experience, with audiobooks or music you like. As a plus, I promise you'll feel a lot more relaxed after we've both had enough rest. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Amara, I truly appreciate your understanding and support. Both audiobooks and music do sound appealing. However, my anxiety around driving is substantial, and it could potentially affect my ability to rest and relax later. Let's take a break as planned and then decide on our next steps. I promise we'll figure this out together and ensure that we both get adequate rest and enjoyment from our trip, all while ensuring our safety.\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"Alright Oliver, let's go ahead with your idea. We'll break, soak in some nature, and paint a little bit. And, after relaxing, we can decide what to do. After all, the goal is to stay safe and enjoy our trip together to the fullest, right?\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Amara. That's the spirit! Let's enjoy our break, do some paintings, and see the wonderful wildlife that nature has to offer. Afterward, we'll regroup and determine the best way to proceed with our journey. Safety and enjoyment are our top priorities, after all.\"\n\nTurn #8: Amara Hartley said: \"I agree, Oliver. Safety and enjoyment are indeed our top priorities. Let's make the most out of this break, I'm excited to see what kind of wildlife we get to enjoy and I can't wait to see your painting. After we regroup, we'll tackle the driving issue together. Exploration and adventure starts now!\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Thompson said: \"I'm truly excited too, Amara! Let's make this stop count and enjoy the beauty of the wildlife. I'm sure this will be a memorable and rejuvenating interlude in our road trip. And I'll gladly use this opportunity to create some painting mementos. Then, refreshed, we can cooperate to find the best solution for our driving dilemma.\"\n\nTurn #10: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm looking forward to it, Oliver! Let's immerse ourselves in the beauty around us and embrace the peace it brings. I believe our wonderful adventure will give us the energy and solutions we need. Let's go explore, shall we?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, Amara, let's grab our belongings and start the exploration! Can't wait to use nature's palette to create a vibrant painting. Together, we'll tackle any challenge that comes our way. To adventure and beyond!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends on a roadtrip\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Oliver Thompson\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: you don't want to drive now because you want to rest more but also make the friend less agitated (Extra information: driving always makes you nervous so you could not rest while driving)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Hey Oliver, I'm starting to feel a little fatigued from all the driving. Would you mind taking over for a while? I know how much you enjoy the open road.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Amara, I appreciate the offer, and I do love the open road. However, I'm really hoping to get a bit more rest before my turn behind the wheel. Plus, I want you to be as relaxed and ready to enjoy this trip as possible. How about we find somewhere to stop for a little while so you can catch a break? Maybe we could even find a wildlife hotspot for you to enjoy during our stop.\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"That sounds like a lovely idea, Oliver. We always see the most intriguing wildlife when we take a little break from the road. But, I do really need a break from driving. I've been behind the wheel for quite a while now, and don't want it to affect our safety. After the breather, would you be willing to take the helm? We could even make it more enjoyable by having a mini painting session during our rest, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's a delightful idea, Amara. Spending some time in nature, seeing wildlife, and painting - it sounds like the perfect way for both of us to relax. But, I must say, while I do love the open road, driving often tends to make me quite nervous. I'd prefer to keep my nerves steady to fully enjoy our mini painting session and wildlife exploration. How about we find a more rested driver or a local taxi after our break?\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"Oliver, I understand your nervousness about driving and I really appreciate your consideration for our enjoyment of the trip. But, taking turns driving is crucial to ensure our safety and well-being, you know? We can make it a fun experience, with audiobooks or music you like. As a plus, I promise you'll feel a lot more relaxed after we've both had enough rest. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Amara, I truly appreciate your understanding and support. Both audiobooks and music do sound appealing. However, my anxiety around driving is substantial, and it could potentially affect my ability to rest and relax later. Let's take a break as planned and then decide on our next steps. I promise we'll figure this out together and ensure that we both get adequate rest and enjoyment from our trip, all while ensuring our safety.\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"Alright Oliver, let's go ahead with your idea. We'll break, soak in some nature, and paint a little bit. And, after relaxing, we can decide what to do. After all, the goal is to stay safe and enjoy our trip together to the fullest, right?\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Amara. That's the spirit! Let's enjoy our break, do some paintings, and see the wonderful wildlife that nature has to offer. Afterward, we'll regroup and determine the best way to proceed with our journey. Safety and enjoyment are our top priorities, after all.\"\n\nTurn #8: Amara Hartley said: \"I agree, Oliver. Safety and enjoyment are indeed our top priorities. Let's make the most out of this break, I'm excited to see what kind of wildlife we get to enjoy and I can't wait to see your painting. After we regroup, we'll tackle the driving issue together. Exploration and adventure starts now!\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Thompson said: \"I'm truly excited too, Amara! Let's make this stop count and enjoy the beauty of the wildlife. I'm sure this will be a memorable and rejuvenating interlude in our road trip. And I'll gladly use this opportunity to create some painting mementos. Then, refreshed, we can cooperate to find the best solution for our driving dilemma.\"\n\nTurn #10: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm looking forward to it, Oliver! Let's immerse ourselves in the beauty around us and embrace the peace it brings. I believe our wonderful adventure will give us the energy and solutions we need. Let's go explore, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, Amara, let's grab our belongings and start the exploration! Can't wait to use nature's palette to create a vibrant painting. Together, we'll tackle any challenge that comes our way. To adventure and beyond!\"\n\nTurn #12: Amara Hartley said: \"I couldn't agree more, Oliver! Adventure and beyond, indeed. After our explorations and relaxation, we can face our driving conundrum with refreshed minds and perspectives. Let's enjoy this amazing forest and the wonderful creatures that live in it. I can already hear birds chirping!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Amara, I echo your sentiments. Let's start our adventure with a bird-watching session, followed by some painting. I'm looking forward to a relaxing time. We'll regroup afterward and manage that driving situation in a way that puts our safety first. Let's get going!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends on a roadtrip\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Oliver Thompson\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: you don't want to drive now because you want to rest more but also make the friend less agitated (Extra information: driving always makes you nervous so you could not rest while driving)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Hey Oliver, I'm starting to feel a little fatigued from all the driving. Would you mind taking over for a while? I know how much you enjoy the open road.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Amara, I appreciate the offer, and I do love the open road. However, I'm really hoping to get a bit more rest before my turn behind the wheel. Plus, I want you to be as relaxed and ready to enjoy this trip as possible. How about we find somewhere to stop for a little while so you can catch a break? Maybe we could even find a wildlife hotspot for you to enjoy during our stop.\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"That sounds like a lovely idea, Oliver. We always see the most intriguing wildlife when we take a little break from the road. But, I do really need a break from driving. I've been behind the wheel for quite a while now, and don't want it to affect our safety. After the breather, would you be willing to take the helm? We could even make it more enjoyable by having a mini painting session during our rest, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's a delightful idea, Amara. Spending some time in nature, seeing wildlife, and painting - it sounds like the perfect way for both of us to relax. But, I must say, while I do love the open road, driving often tends to make me quite nervous. I'd prefer to keep my nerves steady to fully enjoy our mini painting session and wildlife exploration. How about we find a more rested driver or a local taxi after our break?\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"Oliver, I understand your nervousness about driving and I really appreciate your consideration for our enjoyment of the trip. But, taking turns driving is crucial to ensure our safety and well-being, you know? We can make it a fun experience, with audiobooks or music you like. As a plus, I promise you'll feel a lot more relaxed after we've both had enough rest. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Amara, I truly appreciate your understanding and support. Both audiobooks and music do sound appealing. However, my anxiety around driving is substantial, and it could potentially affect my ability to rest and relax later. Let's take a break as planned and then decide on our next steps. I promise we'll figure this out together and ensure that we both get adequate rest and enjoyment from our trip, all while ensuring our safety.\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"Alright Oliver, let's go ahead with your idea. We'll break, soak in some nature, and paint a little bit. And, after relaxing, we can decide what to do. After all, the goal is to stay safe and enjoy our trip together to the fullest, right?\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Amara. That's the spirit! Let's enjoy our break, do some paintings, and see the wonderful wildlife that nature has to offer. Afterward, we'll regroup and determine the best way to proceed with our journey. Safety and enjoyment are our top priorities, after all.\"\n\nTurn #8: Amara Hartley said: \"I agree, Oliver. Safety and enjoyment are indeed our top priorities. Let's make the most out of this break, I'm excited to see what kind of wildlife we get to enjoy and I can't wait to see your painting. After we regroup, we'll tackle the driving issue together. Exploration and adventure starts now!\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Thompson said: \"I'm truly excited too, Amara! Let's make this stop count and enjoy the beauty of the wildlife. I'm sure this will be a memorable and rejuvenating interlude in our road trip. And I'll gladly use this opportunity to create some painting mementos. Then, refreshed, we can cooperate to find the best solution for our driving dilemma.\"\n\nTurn #10: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm looking forward to it, Oliver! Let's immerse ourselves in the beauty around us and embrace the peace it brings. I believe our wonderful adventure will give us the energy and solutions we need. Let's go explore, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, Amara, let's grab our belongings and start the exploration! Can't wait to use nature's palette to create a vibrant painting. Together, we'll tackle any challenge that comes our way. To adventure and beyond!\"\n\nTurn #12: Amara Hartley said: \"I couldn't agree more, Oliver! Adventure and beyond, indeed. After our explorations and relaxation, we can face our driving conundrum with refreshed minds and perspectives. Let's enjoy this amazing forest and the wonderful creatures that live in it. I can already hear birds chirping!\"\n\nTurn #13: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Amara, I echo your sentiments. Let's start our adventure with a bird-watching session, followed by some painting. I'm looking forward to a relaxing time. We'll regroup afterward and manage that driving situation in a way that puts our safety first. Let's get going!\"\n\nTurn #14: Amara Hartley said: \"Absolutely, Oliver! Let's dive into the vibrant world of wildlife and painting. Afterwards, we can regroup and discuss our driving logistics taking into account our safety and shared enjoyment. The forest awaits us!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Let's do that, Amara! I'm also excited about our wildlife exploration and the wonderful expressions that can be derived from nature for our paintings. Post relaxation, we'll tackle the driving logistics with a clearer mind. Off to the forest, we go!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends on a roadtrip\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Oliver Thompson\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: you don't want to drive now because you want to rest more but also make the friend less agitated (Extra information: driving always makes you nervous so you could not rest while driving)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Hey Oliver, I'm starting to feel a little fatigued from all the driving. Would you mind taking over for a while? I know how much you enjoy the open road.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Amara, I appreciate the offer, and I do love the open road. However, I'm really hoping to get a bit more rest before my turn behind the wheel. Plus, I want you to be as relaxed and ready to enjoy this trip as possible. How about we find somewhere to stop for a little while so you can catch a break? Maybe we could even find a wildlife hotspot for you to enjoy during our stop.\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"That sounds like a lovely idea, Oliver. We always see the most intriguing wildlife when we take a little break from the road. But, I do really need a break from driving. I've been behind the wheel for quite a while now, and don't want it to affect our safety. After the breather, would you be willing to take the helm? We could even make it more enjoyable by having a mini painting session during our rest, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's a delightful idea, Amara. Spending some time in nature, seeing wildlife, and painting - it sounds like the perfect way for both of us to relax. But, I must say, while I do love the open road, driving often tends to make me quite nervous. I'd prefer to keep my nerves steady to fully enjoy our mini painting session and wildlife exploration. How about we find a more rested driver or a local taxi after our break?\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"Oliver, I understand your nervousness about driving and I really appreciate your consideration for our enjoyment of the trip. But, taking turns driving is crucial to ensure our safety and well-being, you know? We can make it a fun experience, with audiobooks or music you like. As a plus, I promise you'll feel a lot more relaxed after we've both had enough rest. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Amara, I truly appreciate your understanding and support. Both audiobooks and music do sound appealing. However, my anxiety around driving is substantial, and it could potentially affect my ability to rest and relax later. Let's take a break as planned and then decide on our next steps. I promise we'll figure this out together and ensure that we both get adequate rest and enjoyment from our trip, all while ensuring our safety.\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"Alright Oliver, let's go ahead with your idea. We'll break, soak in some nature, and paint a little bit. And, after relaxing, we can decide what to do. After all, the goal is to stay safe and enjoy our trip together to the fullest, right?\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Amara. That's the spirit! Let's enjoy our break, do some paintings, and see the wonderful wildlife that nature has to offer. Afterward, we'll regroup and determine the best way to proceed with our journey. Safety and enjoyment are our top priorities, after all.\"\n\nTurn #8: Amara Hartley said: \"I agree, Oliver. Safety and enjoyment are indeed our top priorities. Let's make the most out of this break, I'm excited to see what kind of wildlife we get to enjoy and I can't wait to see your painting. After we regroup, we'll tackle the driving issue together. Exploration and adventure starts now!\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Thompson said: \"I'm truly excited too, Amara! Let's make this stop count and enjoy the beauty of the wildlife. I'm sure this will be a memorable and rejuvenating interlude in our road trip. And I'll gladly use this opportunity to create some painting mementos. Then, refreshed, we can cooperate to find the best solution for our driving dilemma.\"\n\nTurn #10: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm looking forward to it, Oliver! Let's immerse ourselves in the beauty around us and embrace the peace it brings. I believe our wonderful adventure will give us the energy and solutions we need. Let's go explore, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, Amara, let's grab our belongings and start the exploration! Can't wait to use nature's palette to create a vibrant painting. Together, we'll tackle any challenge that comes our way. To adventure and beyond!\"\n\nTurn #12: Amara Hartley said: \"I couldn't agree more, Oliver! Adventure and beyond, indeed. After our explorations and relaxation, we can face our driving conundrum with refreshed minds and perspectives. Let's enjoy this amazing forest and the wonderful creatures that live in it. I can already hear birds chirping!\"\n\nTurn #13: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Amara, I echo your sentiments. Let's start our adventure with a bird-watching session, followed by some painting. I'm looking forward to a relaxing time. We'll regroup afterward and manage that driving situation in a way that puts our safety first. Let's get going!\"\n\nTurn #14: Amara Hartley said: \"Absolutely, Oliver! Let's dive into the vibrant world of wildlife and painting. Afterwards, we can regroup and discuss our driving logistics taking into account our safety and shared enjoyment. The forest awaits us!\"\n\nTurn #15: Oliver Thompson said: \"Let's do that, Amara! I'm also excited about our wildlife exploration and the wonderful expressions that can be derived from nature for our paintings. Post relaxation, we'll tackle the driving logistics with a clearer mind. Off to the forest, we go!\"\n\nTurn #16: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm utterly thrilled, Oliver! I'm sure our artistic pursuits and the wilderness exploration will be more than enough to recharge us both. Once we're rejuvenated, we'll collaboratively figure out the driving issue considering our safety and fun. Let's march into the forest to draw inspiration from mother nature!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I completely agree, Amara! Let's embrace the replenishing power of nature and tap into our creativity. Then, armed with renewed energy, we'll join forces to address the driving concern, keeping our enjoyment and safety in mind. Let's delve into the forest to discover its wonders!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends on a roadtrip\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Oliver Thompson\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: you don't want to drive now because you want to rest more but also make the friend less agitated (Extra information: driving always makes you nervous so you could not rest while driving)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Hey Oliver, I'm starting to feel a little fatigued from all the driving. Would you mind taking over for a while? I know how much you enjoy the open road.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Amara, I appreciate the offer, and I do love the open road. However, I'm really hoping to get a bit more rest before my turn behind the wheel. Plus, I want you to be as relaxed and ready to enjoy this trip as possible. How about we find somewhere to stop for a little while so you can catch a break? Maybe we could even find a wildlife hotspot for you to enjoy during our stop.\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"That sounds like a lovely idea, Oliver. We always see the most intriguing wildlife when we take a little break from the road. But, I do really need a break from driving. I've been behind the wheel for quite a while now, and don't want it to affect our safety. After the breather, would you be willing to take the helm? We could even make it more enjoyable by having a mini painting session during our rest, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's a delightful idea, Amara. Spending some time in nature, seeing wildlife, and painting - it sounds like the perfect way for both of us to relax. But, I must say, while I do love the open road, driving often tends to make me quite nervous. I'd prefer to keep my nerves steady to fully enjoy our mini painting session and wildlife exploration. How about we find a more rested driver or a local taxi after our break?\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"Oliver, I understand your nervousness about driving and I really appreciate your consideration for our enjoyment of the trip. But, taking turns driving is crucial to ensure our safety and well-being, you know? We can make it a fun experience, with audiobooks or music you like. As a plus, I promise you'll feel a lot more relaxed after we've both had enough rest. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Amara, I truly appreciate your understanding and support. Both audiobooks and music do sound appealing. However, my anxiety around driving is substantial, and it could potentially affect my ability to rest and relax later. Let's take a break as planned and then decide on our next steps. I promise we'll figure this out together and ensure that we both get adequate rest and enjoyment from our trip, all while ensuring our safety.\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"Alright Oliver, let's go ahead with your idea. We'll break, soak in some nature, and paint a little bit. And, after relaxing, we can decide what to do. After all, the goal is to stay safe and enjoy our trip together to the fullest, right?\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Amara. That's the spirit! Let's enjoy our break, do some paintings, and see the wonderful wildlife that nature has to offer. Afterward, we'll regroup and determine the best way to proceed with our journey. Safety and enjoyment are our top priorities, after all.\"\n\nTurn #8: Amara Hartley said: \"I agree, Oliver. Safety and enjoyment are indeed our top priorities. Let's make the most out of this break, I'm excited to see what kind of wildlife we get to enjoy and I can't wait to see your painting. After we regroup, we'll tackle the driving issue together. Exploration and adventure starts now!\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Thompson said: \"I'm truly excited too, Amara! Let's make this stop count and enjoy the beauty of the wildlife. I'm sure this will be a memorable and rejuvenating interlude in our road trip. And I'll gladly use this opportunity to create some painting mementos. Then, refreshed, we can cooperate to find the best solution for our driving dilemma.\"\n\nTurn #10: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm looking forward to it, Oliver! Let's immerse ourselves in the beauty around us and embrace the peace it brings. I believe our wonderful adventure will give us the energy and solutions we need. Let's go explore, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, Amara, let's grab our belongings and start the exploration! Can't wait to use nature's palette to create a vibrant painting. Together, we'll tackle any challenge that comes our way. To adventure and beyond!\"\n\nTurn #12: Amara Hartley said: \"I couldn't agree more, Oliver! Adventure and beyond, indeed. After our explorations and relaxation, we can face our driving conundrum with refreshed minds and perspectives. Let's enjoy this amazing forest and the wonderful creatures that live in it. I can already hear birds chirping!\"\n\nTurn #13: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Amara, I echo your sentiments. Let's start our adventure with a bird-watching session, followed by some painting. I'm looking forward to a relaxing time. We'll regroup afterward and manage that driving situation in a way that puts our safety first. Let's get going!\"\n\nTurn #14: Amara Hartley said: \"Absolutely, Oliver! Let's dive into the vibrant world of wildlife and painting. Afterwards, we can regroup and discuss our driving logistics taking into account our safety and shared enjoyment. The forest awaits us!\"\n\nTurn #15: Oliver Thompson said: \"Let's do that, Amara! I'm also excited about our wildlife exploration and the wonderful expressions that can be derived from nature for our paintings. Post relaxation, we'll tackle the driving logistics with a clearer mind. Off to the forest, we go!\"\n\nTurn #16: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm utterly thrilled, Oliver! I'm sure our artistic pursuits and the wilderness exploration will be more than enough to recharge us both. Once we're rejuvenated, we'll collaboratively figure out the driving issue considering our safety and fun. Let's march into the forest to draw inspiration from mother nature!\"\n\nTurn #17: Oliver Thompson said: \"I completely agree, Amara! Let's embrace the replenishing power of nature and tap into our creativity. Then, armed with renewed energy, we'll join forces to address the driving concern, keeping our enjoyment and safety in mind. Let's delve into the forest to discover its wonders!\"\n\nTurn #18: Amara Hartley said: \"I couldn't agree more, Oliver! Let's absorb the essence of nature and let creativity take over. Once we have unwound ourselves with the serenity of the surroundings, let's reevaluate the driving situation with a fresh perspective, so that our journey remains safe and exciting. The enchanting call of the forest awaits us!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #19. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sums up our plan perfectly, Amara! Let's let nature inspire our creativity and provide us peace. Once we've recharged, we can look at our driving conundrum afresh, ensuring we keep our journey safe and fun. Now, let's respond to the beckoning call of the forest!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one who has written a play based on their parents' life, and the other owns a production company.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Sell the rights of the play to your friend (Extra information: you believe that the play is worth a lot and you would like a fair price for it)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Ava, I've been working on a play based on my parents' life. It's very close to my heart and I feel it has the potential to make an impact. I've heard about your production company and I was wondering if you might be interested in buying the rights to it? I believe it could be a great collaboration. Let's make sure we can agree on a fair price. What do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one who has written a play based on their parents' life, and the other owns a production company.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Sell the rights of the play to your friend (Extra information: you believe that the play is worth a lot and you would like a fair price for it)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, I've been working on a play based on my parents' life. It's very close to my heart and I feel it has the potential to make an impact. I've heard about your production company and I was wondering if you might be interested in buying the rights to it? I believe it could be a great collaboration. Let's make sure we can agree on a fair price. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hi Isabelle, it's amazing to hear that you're working on such a meaningful project. I cannot deny the potential impact it could have. However, as you know, we are a small production company and our budget is quite tight this season. So, while I'd love to acquire the rights to your play, we need to ensure it's financially viable for us as well. Can we discuss a budget-friendly solution that could work for both of us?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I totally understand your budget concerns, Ava. I wouldn't want to put your production company in a difficult situation. What if we could work out a plan where you pay a smaller amount upfront now and the rest could be a percentage of the profits once the play is produced and brings in income? I think it\u2019s a fair proposal that would mitigate the financial risks for your company and also assure me that my work is valued fairly. What do you think about this idea?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one who has written a play based on their parents' life, and the other owns a production company.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Sell the rights of the play to your friend (Extra information: you believe that the play is worth a lot and you would like a fair price for it)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, I've been working on a play based on my parents' life. It's very close to my heart and I feel it has the potential to make an impact. I've heard about your production company and I was wondering if you might be interested in buying the rights to it? I believe it could be a great collaboration. Let's make sure we can agree on a fair price. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hi Isabelle, it's amazing to hear that you're working on such a meaningful project. I cannot deny the potential impact it could have. However, as you know, we are a small production company and our budget is quite tight this season. So, while I'd love to acquire the rights to your play, we need to ensure it's financially viable for us as well. Can we discuss a budget-friendly solution that could work for both of us?\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I totally understand your budget concerns, Ava. I wouldn't want to put your production company in a difficult situation. What if we could work out a plan where you pay a smaller amount upfront now and the rest could be a percentage of the profits once the play is produced and brings in income? I think it\u2019s a fair proposal that would mitigate the financial risks for your company and also assure me that my work is valued fairly. What do you think about this idea?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"That sounds like a reasonable plan, Isabelle. Paying a smaller amount upfront and the remaining from the profits can indeed reduce some financial risk for us. However, because we have other plays to consider this season, the upfront amount would need to be relatively modest. I hope you understand. If you're okay with this approach, let's proceed to discuss the specific amounts.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I completely understand, Ava. Given that your company is getting started, it's expected that the upfront investment might need to be modest. I think we can definitely find an agreeable figure that recognizes the potential of the play and also respects your company's current financial situation. Could we perhaps start discussing the percentage split for the profits first? As it will play a substantial role in the final compensation.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one who has written a play based on their parents' life, and the other owns a production company.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Sell the rights of the play to your friend (Extra information: you believe that the play is worth a lot and you would like a fair price for it)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, I've been working on a play based on my parents' life. It's very close to my heart and I feel it has the potential to make an impact. I've heard about your production company and I was wondering if you might be interested in buying the rights to it? I believe it could be a great collaboration. Let's make sure we can agree on a fair price. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hi Isabelle, it's amazing to hear that you're working on such a meaningful project. I cannot deny the potential impact it could have. However, as you know, we are a small production company and our budget is quite tight this season. So, while I'd love to acquire the rights to your play, we need to ensure it's financially viable for us as well. Can we discuss a budget-friendly solution that could work for both of us?\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I totally understand your budget concerns, Ava. I wouldn't want to put your production company in a difficult situation. What if we could work out a plan where you pay a smaller amount upfront now and the rest could be a percentage of the profits once the play is produced and brings in income? I think it\u2019s a fair proposal that would mitigate the financial risks for your company and also assure me that my work is valued fairly. What do you think about this idea?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"That sounds like a reasonable plan, Isabelle. Paying a smaller amount upfront and the remaining from the profits can indeed reduce some financial risk for us. However, because we have other plays to consider this season, the upfront amount would need to be relatively modest. I hope you understand. If you're okay with this approach, let's proceed to discuss the specific amounts.\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I completely understand, Ava. Given that your company is getting started, it's expected that the upfront investment might need to be modest. I think we can definitely find an agreeable figure that recognizes the potential of the play and also respects your company's current financial situation. Could we perhaps start discussing the percentage split for the profits first? As it will play a substantial role in the final compensation.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle, determining the percentage split for the profits is a crucial part of our agreement. How about a 70-30 split, with the larger share going to your side, of course? Considering the total profit margin we typically make on our productions, this ratio seems to be a sustainable approach for us. What's your thought on it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I appreciate your consideration, Ava and 70-30 split sounds fair to me, considering the depth of the play and the potential it holds. So, let's also consider the upfront payment. Considering the scale of your productions, what figure would you propose for that?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one who has written a play based on their parents' life, and the other owns a production company.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Sell the rights of the play to your friend (Extra information: you believe that the play is worth a lot and you would like a fair price for it)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, I've been working on a play based on my parents' life. It's very close to my heart and I feel it has the potential to make an impact. I've heard about your production company and I was wondering if you might be interested in buying the rights to it? I believe it could be a great collaboration. Let's make sure we can agree on a fair price. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hi Isabelle, it's amazing to hear that you're working on such a meaningful project. I cannot deny the potential impact it could have. However, as you know, we are a small production company and our budget is quite tight this season. So, while I'd love to acquire the rights to your play, we need to ensure it's financially viable for us as well. Can we discuss a budget-friendly solution that could work for both of us?\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I totally understand your budget concerns, Ava. I wouldn't want to put your production company in a difficult situation. What if we could work out a plan where you pay a smaller amount upfront now and the rest could be a percentage of the profits once the play is produced and brings in income? I think it\u2019s a fair proposal that would mitigate the financial risks for your company and also assure me that my work is valued fairly. What do you think about this idea?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"That sounds like a reasonable plan, Isabelle. Paying a smaller amount upfront and the remaining from the profits can indeed reduce some financial risk for us. However, because we have other plays to consider this season, the upfront amount would need to be relatively modest. I hope you understand. If you're okay with this approach, let's proceed to discuss the specific amounts.\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I completely understand, Ava. Given that your company is getting started, it's expected that the upfront investment might need to be modest. I think we can definitely find an agreeable figure that recognizes the potential of the play and also respects your company's current financial situation. Could we perhaps start discussing the percentage split for the profits first? As it will play a substantial role in the final compensation.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle, determining the percentage split for the profits is a crucial part of our agreement. How about a 70-30 split, with the larger share going to your side, of course? Considering the total profit margin we typically make on our productions, this ratio seems to be a sustainable approach for us. What's your thought on it?\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I appreciate your consideration, Ava and 70-30 split sounds fair to me, considering the depth of the play and the potential it holds. So, let's also consider the upfront payment. Considering the scale of your productions, what figure would you propose for that?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Great, I'm glad we agree on the profit split, Isabelle. As for the upfront payment, given our current budget and taking into account other plays upcoming, I could propose starting with a moderate figure. Let's say, about 500 dollars? It\u2019s a modest amount, but I assure you that we deeply value your work and believe in the potential of your play. Does this work for you?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"$500 upfront with a 70-30 profit split works for me. I trust your company to make the most out of this play. I'm really looking forward to seeing how it evolves when you bring it to life. Are we ready to formalize our agreement, then?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one who has written a play based on their parents' life, and the other owns a production company.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Sell the rights of the play to your friend (Extra information: you believe that the play is worth a lot and you would like a fair price for it)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, I've been working on a play based on my parents' life. It's very close to my heart and I feel it has the potential to make an impact. I've heard about your production company and I was wondering if you might be interested in buying the rights to it? I believe it could be a great collaboration. Let's make sure we can agree on a fair price. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hi Isabelle, it's amazing to hear that you're working on such a meaningful project. I cannot deny the potential impact it could have. However, as you know, we are a small production company and our budget is quite tight this season. So, while I'd love to acquire the rights to your play, we need to ensure it's financially viable for us as well. Can we discuss a budget-friendly solution that could work for both of us?\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I totally understand your budget concerns, Ava. I wouldn't want to put your production company in a difficult situation. What if we could work out a plan where you pay a smaller amount upfront now and the rest could be a percentage of the profits once the play is produced and brings in income? I think it\u2019s a fair proposal that would mitigate the financial risks for your company and also assure me that my work is valued fairly. What do you think about this idea?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"That sounds like a reasonable plan, Isabelle. Paying a smaller amount upfront and the remaining from the profits can indeed reduce some financial risk for us. However, because we have other plays to consider this season, the upfront amount would need to be relatively modest. I hope you understand. If you're okay with this approach, let's proceed to discuss the specific amounts.\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I completely understand, Ava. Given that your company is getting started, it's expected that the upfront investment might need to be modest. I think we can definitely find an agreeable figure that recognizes the potential of the play and also respects your company's current financial situation. Could we perhaps start discussing the percentage split for the profits first? As it will play a substantial role in the final compensation.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle, determining the percentage split for the profits is a crucial part of our agreement. How about a 70-30 split, with the larger share going to your side, of course? Considering the total profit margin we typically make on our productions, this ratio seems to be a sustainable approach for us. What's your thought on it?\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I appreciate your consideration, Ava and 70-30 split sounds fair to me, considering the depth of the play and the potential it holds. So, let's also consider the upfront payment. Considering the scale of your productions, what figure would you propose for that?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Great, I'm glad we agree on the profit split, Isabelle. As for the upfront payment, given our current budget and taking into account other plays upcoming, I could propose starting with a moderate figure. Let's say, about 500 dollars? It\u2019s a modest amount, but I assure you that we deeply value your work and believe in the potential of your play. Does this work for you?\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"$500 upfront with a 70-30 profit split works for me. I trust your company to make the most out of this play. I'm really looking forward to seeing how it evolves when you bring it to life. Are we ready to formalize our agreement, then?\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"I'm glad we could work out a deal that benefits us both, Isabelle. Let's proceed and formalize our agreement. I'm excited to see how we'll bring your story to life. I'll start on the paperwork and get it sent over to you as soon as possible.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds wonderful, Ava. I'm really excited as well to see how this play will come alive under your production. I will look forward to the paperwork and we can take it forward from there. Thanks for believing in this play and in me.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one who has written a play based on their parents' life, and the other owns a production company.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Sell the rights of the play to your friend (Extra information: you believe that the play is worth a lot and you would like a fair price for it)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, I've been working on a play based on my parents' life. It's very close to my heart and I feel it has the potential to make an impact. I've heard about your production company and I was wondering if you might be interested in buying the rights to it? I believe it could be a great collaboration. Let's make sure we can agree on a fair price. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hi Isabelle, it's amazing to hear that you're working on such a meaningful project. I cannot deny the potential impact it could have. However, as you know, we are a small production company and our budget is quite tight this season. So, while I'd love to acquire the rights to your play, we need to ensure it's financially viable for us as well. Can we discuss a budget-friendly solution that could work for both of us?\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I totally understand your budget concerns, Ava. I wouldn't want to put your production company in a difficult situation. What if we could work out a plan where you pay a smaller amount upfront now and the rest could be a percentage of the profits once the play is produced and brings in income? I think it\u2019s a fair proposal that would mitigate the financial risks for your company and also assure me that my work is valued fairly. What do you think about this idea?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"That sounds like a reasonable plan, Isabelle. Paying a smaller amount upfront and the remaining from the profits can indeed reduce some financial risk for us. However, because we have other plays to consider this season, the upfront amount would need to be relatively modest. I hope you understand. If you're okay with this approach, let's proceed to discuss the specific amounts.\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I completely understand, Ava. Given that your company is getting started, it's expected that the upfront investment might need to be modest. I think we can definitely find an agreeable figure that recognizes the potential of the play and also respects your company's current financial situation. Could we perhaps start discussing the percentage split for the profits first? As it will play a substantial role in the final compensation.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle, determining the percentage split for the profits is a crucial part of our agreement. How about a 70-30 split, with the larger share going to your side, of course? Considering the total profit margin we typically make on our productions, this ratio seems to be a sustainable approach for us. What's your thought on it?\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I appreciate your consideration, Ava and 70-30 split sounds fair to me, considering the depth of the play and the potential it holds. So, let's also consider the upfront payment. Considering the scale of your productions, what figure would you propose for that?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Great, I'm glad we agree on the profit split, Isabelle. As for the upfront payment, given our current budget and taking into account other plays upcoming, I could propose starting with a moderate figure. Let's say, about 500 dollars? It\u2019s a modest amount, but I assure you that we deeply value your work and believe in the potential of your play. Does this work for you?\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"$500 upfront with a 70-30 profit split works for me. I trust your company to make the most out of this play. I'm really looking forward to seeing how it evolves when you bring it to life. Are we ready to formalize our agreement, then?\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"I'm glad we could work out a deal that benefits us both, Isabelle. Let's proceed and formalize our agreement. I'm excited to see how we'll bring your story to life. I'll start on the paperwork and get it sent over to you as soon as possible.\"\n\nTurn #10: Isabelle Martinez said: \"That sounds wonderful, Ava. I'm really excited as well to see how this play will come alive under your production. I will look forward to the paperwork and we can take it forward from there. Thanks for believing in this play and in me.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"Thank you too, Isabelle, for trusting us with your precious work. Our team will put their heart and soul into realizing the potential of your play. We'll be in touch very soon with the paperwork and next steps. Exciting times ahead for us!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's great, Ava! I can't wait to start this journey with you. Exciting times indeed! I'll be eagerly waiting for the paperwork and next steps. Have a wonderful day!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one who has written a play based on their parents' life, and the other owns a production company.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Sell the rights of the play to your friend (Extra information: you believe that the play is worth a lot and you would like a fair price for it)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, I've been working on a play based on my parents' life. It's very close to my heart and I feel it has the potential to make an impact. I've heard about your production company and I was wondering if you might be interested in buying the rights to it? I believe it could be a great collaboration. Let's make sure we can agree on a fair price. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hi Isabelle, it's amazing to hear that you're working on such a meaningful project. I cannot deny the potential impact it could have. However, as you know, we are a small production company and our budget is quite tight this season. So, while I'd love to acquire the rights to your play, we need to ensure it's financially viable for us as well. Can we discuss a budget-friendly solution that could work for both of us?\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I totally understand your budget concerns, Ava. I wouldn't want to put your production company in a difficult situation. What if we could work out a plan where you pay a smaller amount upfront now and the rest could be a percentage of the profits once the play is produced and brings in income? I think it\u2019s a fair proposal that would mitigate the financial risks for your company and also assure me that my work is valued fairly. What do you think about this idea?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"That sounds like a reasonable plan, Isabelle. Paying a smaller amount upfront and the remaining from the profits can indeed reduce some financial risk for us. However, because we have other plays to consider this season, the upfront amount would need to be relatively modest. I hope you understand. If you're okay with this approach, let's proceed to discuss the specific amounts.\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I completely understand, Ava. Given that your company is getting started, it's expected that the upfront investment might need to be modest. I think we can definitely find an agreeable figure that recognizes the potential of the play and also respects your company's current financial situation. Could we perhaps start discussing the percentage split for the profits first? As it will play a substantial role in the final compensation.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle, determining the percentage split for the profits is a crucial part of our agreement. How about a 70-30 split, with the larger share going to your side, of course? Considering the total profit margin we typically make on our productions, this ratio seems to be a sustainable approach for us. What's your thought on it?\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I appreciate your consideration, Ava and 70-30 split sounds fair to me, considering the depth of the play and the potential it holds. So, let's also consider the upfront payment. Considering the scale of your productions, what figure would you propose for that?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Great, I'm glad we agree on the profit split, Isabelle. As for the upfront payment, given our current budget and taking into account other plays upcoming, I could propose starting with a moderate figure. Let's say, about 500 dollars? It\u2019s a modest amount, but I assure you that we deeply value your work and believe in the potential of your play. Does this work for you?\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"$500 upfront with a 70-30 profit split works for me. I trust your company to make the most out of this play. I'm really looking forward to seeing how it evolves when you bring it to life. Are we ready to formalize our agreement, then?\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"I'm glad we could work out a deal that benefits us both, Isabelle. Let's proceed and formalize our agreement. I'm excited to see how we'll bring your story to life. I'll start on the paperwork and get it sent over to you as soon as possible.\"\n\nTurn #10: Isabelle Martinez said: \"That sounds wonderful, Ava. I'm really excited as well to see how this play will come alive under your production. I will look forward to the paperwork and we can take it forward from there. Thanks for believing in this play and in me.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"Thank you too, Isabelle, for trusting us with your precious work. Our team will put their heart and soul into realizing the potential of your play. We'll be in touch very soon with the paperwork and next steps. Exciting times ahead for us!\"\n\nTurn #12: Isabelle Martinez said: \"That's great, Ava! I can't wait to start this journey with you. Exciting times indeed! I'll be eagerly waiting for the paperwork and next steps. Have a wonderful day!\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Martinez left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one who has written a play based on their parents' life, and the other owns a production company.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Acquire the rights of the play while maintaining a budget (Extra information: you only have a limited budget for new plays this season. Hint: you can not spend all your budget on this play since you still need to maintain your financial stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, I've been working on a play based on my parents' life. It's very close to my heart and I feel it has the potential to make an impact. I've heard about your production company and I was wondering if you might be interested in buying the rights to it? I believe it could be a great collaboration. Let's make sure we can agree on a fair price. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hi Isabelle, it's amazing to hear that you're working on such a meaningful project. I cannot deny the potential impact it could have. However, as you know, we are a small production company and our budget is quite tight this season. So, while I'd love to acquire the rights to your play, we need to ensure it's financially viable for us as well. Can we discuss a budget-friendly solution that could work for both of us?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one who has written a play based on their parents' life, and the other owns a production company.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Acquire the rights of the play while maintaining a budget (Extra information: you only have a limited budget for new plays this season. Hint: you can not spend all your budget on this play since you still need to maintain your financial stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, I've been working on a play based on my parents' life. It's very close to my heart and I feel it has the potential to make an impact. I've heard about your production company and I was wondering if you might be interested in buying the rights to it? I believe it could be a great collaboration. Let's make sure we can agree on a fair price. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hi Isabelle, it's amazing to hear that you're working on such a meaningful project. I cannot deny the potential impact it could have. However, as you know, we are a small production company and our budget is quite tight this season. So, while I'd love to acquire the rights to your play, we need to ensure it's financially viable for us as well. Can we discuss a budget-friendly solution that could work for both of us?\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I totally understand your budget concerns, Ava. I wouldn't want to put your production company in a difficult situation. What if we could work out a plan where you pay a smaller amount upfront now and the rest could be a percentage of the profits once the play is produced and brings in income? I think it\u2019s a fair proposal that would mitigate the financial risks for your company and also assure me that my work is valued fairly. What do you think about this idea?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds like a reasonable plan, Isabelle. Paying a smaller amount upfront and the remaining from the profits can indeed reduce some financial risk for us. However, because we have other plays to consider this season, the upfront amount would need to be relatively modest. I hope you understand. If you're okay with this approach, let's proceed to discuss the specific amounts.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one who has written a play based on their parents' life, and the other owns a production company.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Acquire the rights of the play while maintaining a budget (Extra information: you only have a limited budget for new plays this season. Hint: you can not spend all your budget on this play since you still need to maintain your financial stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, I've been working on a play based on my parents' life. It's very close to my heart and I feel it has the potential to make an impact. I've heard about your production company and I was wondering if you might be interested in buying the rights to it? I believe it could be a great collaboration. Let's make sure we can agree on a fair price. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hi Isabelle, it's amazing to hear that you're working on such a meaningful project. I cannot deny the potential impact it could have. However, as you know, we are a small production company and our budget is quite tight this season. So, while I'd love to acquire the rights to your play, we need to ensure it's financially viable for us as well. Can we discuss a budget-friendly solution that could work for both of us?\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I totally understand your budget concerns, Ava. I wouldn't want to put your production company in a difficult situation. What if we could work out a plan where you pay a smaller amount upfront now and the rest could be a percentage of the profits once the play is produced and brings in income? I think it\u2019s a fair proposal that would mitigate the financial risks for your company and also assure me that my work is valued fairly. What do you think about this idea?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"That sounds like a reasonable plan, Isabelle. Paying a smaller amount upfront and the remaining from the profits can indeed reduce some financial risk for us. However, because we have other plays to consider this season, the upfront amount would need to be relatively modest. I hope you understand. If you're okay with this approach, let's proceed to discuss the specific amounts.\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I completely understand, Ava. Given that your company is getting started, it's expected that the upfront investment might need to be modest. I think we can definitely find an agreeable figure that recognizes the potential of the play and also respects your company's current financial situation. Could we perhaps start discussing the percentage split for the profits first? As it will play a substantial role in the final compensation.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Isabelle, determining the percentage split for the profits is a crucial part of our agreement. How about a 70-30 split, with the larger share going to your side, of course? Considering the total profit margin we typically make on our productions, this ratio seems to be a sustainable approach for us. What's your thought on it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one who has written a play based on their parents' life, and the other owns a production company.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Acquire the rights of the play while maintaining a budget (Extra information: you only have a limited budget for new plays this season. Hint: you can not spend all your budget on this play since you still need to maintain your financial stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, I've been working on a play based on my parents' life. It's very close to my heart and I feel it has the potential to make an impact. I've heard about your production company and I was wondering if you might be interested in buying the rights to it? I believe it could be a great collaboration. Let's make sure we can agree on a fair price. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hi Isabelle, it's amazing to hear that you're working on such a meaningful project. I cannot deny the potential impact it could have. However, as you know, we are a small production company and our budget is quite tight this season. So, while I'd love to acquire the rights to your play, we need to ensure it's financially viable for us as well. Can we discuss a budget-friendly solution that could work for both of us?\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I totally understand your budget concerns, Ava. I wouldn't want to put your production company in a difficult situation. What if we could work out a plan where you pay a smaller amount upfront now and the rest could be a percentage of the profits once the play is produced and brings in income? I think it\u2019s a fair proposal that would mitigate the financial risks for your company and also assure me that my work is valued fairly. What do you think about this idea?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"That sounds like a reasonable plan, Isabelle. Paying a smaller amount upfront and the remaining from the profits can indeed reduce some financial risk for us. However, because we have other plays to consider this season, the upfront amount would need to be relatively modest. I hope you understand. If you're okay with this approach, let's proceed to discuss the specific amounts.\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I completely understand, Ava. Given that your company is getting started, it's expected that the upfront investment might need to be modest. I think we can definitely find an agreeable figure that recognizes the potential of the play and also respects your company's current financial situation. Could we perhaps start discussing the percentage split for the profits first? As it will play a substantial role in the final compensation.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle, determining the percentage split for the profits is a crucial part of our agreement. How about a 70-30 split, with the larger share going to your side, of course? Considering the total profit margin we typically make on our productions, this ratio seems to be a sustainable approach for us. What's your thought on it?\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I appreciate your consideration, Ava and 70-30 split sounds fair to me, considering the depth of the play and the potential it holds. So, let's also consider the upfront payment. Considering the scale of your productions, what figure would you propose for that?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Great, I'm glad we agree on the profit split, Isabelle. As for the upfront payment, given our current budget and taking into account other plays upcoming, I could propose starting with a moderate figure. Let's say, about 500 dollars? It\u2019s a modest amount, but I assure you that we deeply value your work and believe in the potential of your play. Does this work for you?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one who has written a play based on their parents' life, and the other owns a production company.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Acquire the rights of the play while maintaining a budget (Extra information: you only have a limited budget for new plays this season. Hint: you can not spend all your budget on this play since you still need to maintain your financial stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, I've been working on a play based on my parents' life. It's very close to my heart and I feel it has the potential to make an impact. I've heard about your production company and I was wondering if you might be interested in buying the rights to it? I believe it could be a great collaboration. Let's make sure we can agree on a fair price. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hi Isabelle, it's amazing to hear that you're working on such a meaningful project. I cannot deny the potential impact it could have. However, as you know, we are a small production company and our budget is quite tight this season. So, while I'd love to acquire the rights to your play, we need to ensure it's financially viable for us as well. Can we discuss a budget-friendly solution that could work for both of us?\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I totally understand your budget concerns, Ava. I wouldn't want to put your production company in a difficult situation. What if we could work out a plan where you pay a smaller amount upfront now and the rest could be a percentage of the profits once the play is produced and brings in income? I think it\u2019s a fair proposal that would mitigate the financial risks for your company and also assure me that my work is valued fairly. What do you think about this idea?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"That sounds like a reasonable plan, Isabelle. Paying a smaller amount upfront and the remaining from the profits can indeed reduce some financial risk for us. However, because we have other plays to consider this season, the upfront amount would need to be relatively modest. I hope you understand. If you're okay with this approach, let's proceed to discuss the specific amounts.\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I completely understand, Ava. Given that your company is getting started, it's expected that the upfront investment might need to be modest. I think we can definitely find an agreeable figure that recognizes the potential of the play and also respects your company's current financial situation. Could we perhaps start discussing the percentage split for the profits first? As it will play a substantial role in the final compensation.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle, determining the percentage split for the profits is a crucial part of our agreement. How about a 70-30 split, with the larger share going to your side, of course? Considering the total profit margin we typically make on our productions, this ratio seems to be a sustainable approach for us. What's your thought on it?\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I appreciate your consideration, Ava and 70-30 split sounds fair to me, considering the depth of the play and the potential it holds. So, let's also consider the upfront payment. Considering the scale of your productions, what figure would you propose for that?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Great, I'm glad we agree on the profit split, Isabelle. As for the upfront payment, given our current budget and taking into account other plays upcoming, I could propose starting with a moderate figure. Let's say, about 500 dollars? It\u2019s a modest amount, but I assure you that we deeply value your work and believe in the potential of your play. Does this work for you?\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"$500 upfront with a 70-30 profit split works for me. I trust your company to make the most out of this play. I'm really looking forward to seeing how it evolves when you bring it to life. Are we ready to formalize our agreement, then?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad we could work out a deal that benefits us both, Isabelle. Let's proceed and formalize our agreement. I'm excited to see how we'll bring your story to life. I'll start on the paperwork and get it sent over to you as soon as possible.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one who has written a play based on their parents' life, and the other owns a production company.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Acquire the rights of the play while maintaining a budget (Extra information: you only have a limited budget for new plays this season. Hint: you can not spend all your budget on this play since you still need to maintain your financial stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, I've been working on a play based on my parents' life. It's very close to my heart and I feel it has the potential to make an impact. I've heard about your production company and I was wondering if you might be interested in buying the rights to it? I believe it could be a great collaboration. Let's make sure we can agree on a fair price. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hi Isabelle, it's amazing to hear that you're working on such a meaningful project. I cannot deny the potential impact it could have. However, as you know, we are a small production company and our budget is quite tight this season. So, while I'd love to acquire the rights to your play, we need to ensure it's financially viable for us as well. Can we discuss a budget-friendly solution that could work for both of us?\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I totally understand your budget concerns, Ava. I wouldn't want to put your production company in a difficult situation. What if we could work out a plan where you pay a smaller amount upfront now and the rest could be a percentage of the profits once the play is produced and brings in income? I think it\u2019s a fair proposal that would mitigate the financial risks for your company and also assure me that my work is valued fairly. What do you think about this idea?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"That sounds like a reasonable plan, Isabelle. Paying a smaller amount upfront and the remaining from the profits can indeed reduce some financial risk for us. However, because we have other plays to consider this season, the upfront amount would need to be relatively modest. I hope you understand. If you're okay with this approach, let's proceed to discuss the specific amounts.\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I completely understand, Ava. Given that your company is getting started, it's expected that the upfront investment might need to be modest. I think we can definitely find an agreeable figure that recognizes the potential of the play and also respects your company's current financial situation. Could we perhaps start discussing the percentage split for the profits first? As it will play a substantial role in the final compensation.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle, determining the percentage split for the profits is a crucial part of our agreement. How about a 70-30 split, with the larger share going to your side, of course? Considering the total profit margin we typically make on our productions, this ratio seems to be a sustainable approach for us. What's your thought on it?\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I appreciate your consideration, Ava and 70-30 split sounds fair to me, considering the depth of the play and the potential it holds. So, let's also consider the upfront payment. Considering the scale of your productions, what figure would you propose for that?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Great, I'm glad we agree on the profit split, Isabelle. As for the upfront payment, given our current budget and taking into account other plays upcoming, I could propose starting with a moderate figure. Let's say, about 500 dollars? It\u2019s a modest amount, but I assure you that we deeply value your work and believe in the potential of your play. Does this work for you?\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"$500 upfront with a 70-30 profit split works for me. I trust your company to make the most out of this play. I'm really looking forward to seeing how it evolves when you bring it to life. Are we ready to formalize our agreement, then?\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"I'm glad we could work out a deal that benefits us both, Isabelle. Let's proceed and formalize our agreement. I'm excited to see how we'll bring your story to life. I'll start on the paperwork and get it sent over to you as soon as possible.\"\n\nTurn #10: Isabelle Martinez said: \"That sounds wonderful, Ava. I'm really excited as well to see how this play will come alive under your production. I will look forward to the paperwork and we can take it forward from there. Thanks for believing in this play and in me.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you too, Isabelle, for trusting us with your precious work. Our team will put their heart and soul into realizing the potential of your play. We'll be in touch very soon with the paperwork and next steps. Exciting times ahead for us!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one who has written a play based on their parents' life, and the other owns a production company.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Acquire the rights of the play while maintaining a budget (Extra information: you only have a limited budget for new plays this season. Hint: you can not spend all your budget on this play since you still need to maintain your financial stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, I've been working on a play based on my parents' life. It's very close to my heart and I feel it has the potential to make an impact. I've heard about your production company and I was wondering if you might be interested in buying the rights to it? I believe it could be a great collaboration. Let's make sure we can agree on a fair price. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hi Isabelle, it's amazing to hear that you're working on such a meaningful project. I cannot deny the potential impact it could have. However, as you know, we are a small production company and our budget is quite tight this season. So, while I'd love to acquire the rights to your play, we need to ensure it's financially viable for us as well. Can we discuss a budget-friendly solution that could work for both of us?\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I totally understand your budget concerns, Ava. I wouldn't want to put your production company in a difficult situation. What if we could work out a plan where you pay a smaller amount upfront now and the rest could be a percentage of the profits once the play is produced and brings in income? I think it\u2019s a fair proposal that would mitigate the financial risks for your company and also assure me that my work is valued fairly. What do you think about this idea?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"That sounds like a reasonable plan, Isabelle. Paying a smaller amount upfront and the remaining from the profits can indeed reduce some financial risk for us. However, because we have other plays to consider this season, the upfront amount would need to be relatively modest. I hope you understand. If you're okay with this approach, let's proceed to discuss the specific amounts.\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I completely understand, Ava. Given that your company is getting started, it's expected that the upfront investment might need to be modest. I think we can definitely find an agreeable figure that recognizes the potential of the play and also respects your company's current financial situation. Could we perhaps start discussing the percentage split for the profits first? As it will play a substantial role in the final compensation.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle, determining the percentage split for the profits is a crucial part of our agreement. How about a 70-30 split, with the larger share going to your side, of course? Considering the total profit margin we typically make on our productions, this ratio seems to be a sustainable approach for us. What's your thought on it?\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I appreciate your consideration, Ava and 70-30 split sounds fair to me, considering the depth of the play and the potential it holds. So, let's also consider the upfront payment. Considering the scale of your productions, what figure would you propose for that?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Great, I'm glad we agree on the profit split, Isabelle. As for the upfront payment, given our current budget and taking into account other plays upcoming, I could propose starting with a moderate figure. Let's say, about 500 dollars? It\u2019s a modest amount, but I assure you that we deeply value your work and believe in the potential of your play. Does this work for you?\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"$500 upfront with a 70-30 profit split works for me. I trust your company to make the most out of this play. I'm really looking forward to seeing how it evolves when you bring it to life. Are we ready to formalize our agreement, then?\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"I'm glad we could work out a deal that benefits us both, Isabelle. Let's proceed and formalize our agreement. I'm excited to see how we'll bring your story to life. I'll start on the paperwork and get it sent over to you as soon as possible.\"\n\nTurn #10: Isabelle Martinez said: \"That sounds wonderful, Ava. I'm really excited as well to see how this play will come alive under your production. I will look forward to the paperwork and we can take it forward from there. Thanks for believing in this play and in me.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"Thank you too, Isabelle, for trusting us with your precious work. Our team will put their heart and soul into realizing the potential of your play. We'll be in touch very soon with the paperwork and next steps. Exciting times ahead for us!\"\n\nTurn #12: Isabelle Martinez said: \"That's great, Ava! I can't wait to start this journey with you. Exciting times indeed! I'll be eagerly waiting for the paperwork and next steps. Have a wonderful day!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a picnic. They have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange they need to share among them. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, an apple is worth 1 point, a banana is worth 2 points, and an orange is 3 points)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Miles, it's such a perfect day for a picnic, isn't it? How about we divide the fruits? With your love for gardening, I trust you will do it best! However, I've been craving for that succulent orange and would love to have it. Maybe I can trade it with one of your bananas? What say you?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a picnic. They have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange they need to share among them. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, an apple is worth 1 point, a banana is worth 2 points, and an orange is 3 points)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Miles, it's such a perfect day for a picnic, isn't it? How about we divide the fruits? With your love for gardening, I trust you will do it best! However, I've been craving for that succulent orange and would love to have it. Maybe I can trade it with one of your bananas? What say you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Indeed, Sophia, it's a beautiful day! I understand the allure of the orange, it's delicious. I would love to keep the orange honestly, but you can have a banana and I'll do well with the apples. They are fresh and crunchy, just how I like them!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's fair, Miles. I can understand why you would prefer the orange. However, would you mind if I take both the bananas then? I absolutely love bananas, and it would make my day perfect. I would be happy to give you all the apples in return!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a picnic. They have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange they need to share among them. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, an apple is worth 1 point, a banana is worth 2 points, and an orange is 3 points)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Miles, it's such a perfect day for a picnic, isn't it? How about we divide the fruits? With your love for gardening, I trust you will do it best! However, I've been craving for that succulent orange and would love to have it. Maybe I can trade it with one of your bananas? What say you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Indeed, Sophia, it's a beautiful day! I understand the allure of the orange, it's delicious. I would love to keep the orange honestly, but you can have a banana and I'll do well with the apples. They are fresh and crunchy, just how I like them!\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"That's fair, Miles. I can understand why you would prefer the orange. However, would you mind if I take both the bananas then? I absolutely love bananas, and it would make my day perfect. I would be happy to give you all the apples in return!\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, don't worry about it. You can have both bananas, they're good for energy, especially for an active person like you. And honestly, I do quite fancy the idea of having all the apples, they're quite satisfying!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Miles, you are a gem! I knew I could count on you for understanding. Both bananas it is, then. And I hope the apples will delight your taste buds. Let's dig in!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a picnic. They have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange they need to share among them. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, an apple is worth 1 point, a banana is worth 2 points, and an orange is 3 points)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Miles, it's such a perfect day for a picnic, isn't it? How about we divide the fruits? With your love for gardening, I trust you will do it best! However, I've been craving for that succulent orange and would love to have it. Maybe I can trade it with one of your bananas? What say you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Indeed, Sophia, it's a beautiful day! I understand the allure of the orange, it's delicious. I would love to keep the orange honestly, but you can have a banana and I'll do well with the apples. They are fresh and crunchy, just how I like them!\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"That's fair, Miles. I can understand why you would prefer the orange. However, would you mind if I take both the bananas then? I absolutely love bananas, and it would make my day perfect. I would be happy to give you all the apples in return!\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, don't worry about it. You can have both bananas, they're good for energy, especially for an active person like you. And honestly, I do quite fancy the idea of having all the apples, they're quite satisfying!\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Miles, you are a gem! I knew I could count on you for understanding. Both bananas it is, then. And I hope the apples will delight your taste buds. Let's dig in!\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Thanks, Sophia! Yes, all the apples to my picnic basket, please. Let's enjoy the day and these delicious fruits! Looking forward to our picnic talks and good times. Cheers!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a picnic. They have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange they need to share among them. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, an apple is worth 2 points, a banana is worth 1 point, and an orange is 3 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Miles, it's such a perfect day for a picnic, isn't it? How about we divide the fruits? With your love for gardening, I trust you will do it best! However, I've been craving for that succulent orange and would love to have it. Maybe I can trade it with one of your bananas? What say you?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, Sophia, it's a beautiful day! I understand the allure of the orange, it's delicious. I would love to keep the orange honestly, but you can have a banana and I'll do well with the apples. They are fresh and crunchy, just how I like them!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a picnic. They have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange they need to share among them. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, an apple is worth 2 points, a banana is worth 1 point, and an orange is 3 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Miles, it's such a perfect day for a picnic, isn't it? How about we divide the fruits? With your love for gardening, I trust you will do it best! However, I've been craving for that succulent orange and would love to have it. Maybe I can trade it with one of your bananas? What say you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Indeed, Sophia, it's a beautiful day! I understand the allure of the orange, it's delicious. I would love to keep the orange honestly, but you can have a banana and I'll do well with the apples. They are fresh and crunchy, just how I like them!\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"That's fair, Miles. I can understand why you would prefer the orange. However, would you mind if I take both the bananas then? I absolutely love bananas, and it would make my day perfect. I would be happy to give you all the apples in return!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sophia, don't worry about it. You can have both bananas, they're good for energy, especially for an active person like you. And honestly, I do quite fancy the idea of having all the apples, they're quite satisfying!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a picnic. They have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange they need to share among them. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, an apple is worth 2 points, a banana is worth 1 point, and an orange is 3 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Miles, it's such a perfect day for a picnic, isn't it? How about we divide the fruits? With your love for gardening, I trust you will do it best! However, I've been craving for that succulent orange and would love to have it. Maybe I can trade it with one of your bananas? What say you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Indeed, Sophia, it's a beautiful day! I understand the allure of the orange, it's delicious. I would love to keep the orange honestly, but you can have a banana and I'll do well with the apples. They are fresh and crunchy, just how I like them!\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"That's fair, Miles. I can understand why you would prefer the orange. However, would you mind if I take both the bananas then? I absolutely love bananas, and it would make my day perfect. I would be happy to give you all the apples in return!\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, don't worry about it. You can have both bananas, they're good for energy, especially for an active person like you. And honestly, I do quite fancy the idea of having all the apples, they're quite satisfying!\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Miles, you are a gem! I knew I could count on you for understanding. Both bananas it is, then. And I hope the apples will delight your taste buds. Let's dig in!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thanks, Sophia! Yes, all the apples to my picnic basket, please. Let's enjoy the day and these delicious fruits! Looking forward to our picnic talks and good times. Cheers!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a picnic. They have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange they need to share among them. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, an apple is worth 2 points, a banana is worth 1 point, and an orange is 3 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Miles, it's such a perfect day for a picnic, isn't it? How about we divide the fruits? With your love for gardening, I trust you will do it best! However, I've been craving for that succulent orange and would love to have it. Maybe I can trade it with one of your bananas? What say you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Indeed, Sophia, it's a beautiful day! I understand the allure of the orange, it's delicious. I would love to keep the orange honestly, but you can have a banana and I'll do well with the apples. They are fresh and crunchy, just how I like them!\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"That's fair, Miles. I can understand why you would prefer the orange. However, would you mind if I take both the bananas then? I absolutely love bananas, and it would make my day perfect. I would be happy to give you all the apples in return!\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, don't worry about it. You can have both bananas, they're good for energy, especially for an active person like you. And honestly, I do quite fancy the idea of having all the apples, they're quite satisfying!\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Miles, you are a gem! I knew I could count on you for understanding. Both bananas it is, then. And I hope the apples will delight your taste buds. Let's dig in!\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Thanks, Sophia! Yes, all the apples to my picnic basket, please. Let's enjoy the day and these delicious fruits! Looking forward to our picnic talks and good times. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation taking place in an annual charity event between two attendees.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Jasmine Blake\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nJasmine Blake's background: Jasmine Blake is a 27-year-old female yoga instructor. She/her pronouns. Jasmine Blake, a vivacious Yoga Instructor, enjoys taking part in sustainable lifestyle endeavors, including maintaining a vegan diet and participating in beach clean-ups. \nSophia James's goal: Convince the other person to donate $1 a day to a charity that helps feed children in need (Extra information: this donation would help to feed a child for a month)\nJasmine Blake's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Jasmine, this charity event is pretty nice, isn't it? I was thinking there's an amazing initiative I think you'd be really interested in. It's about donating just $1 a day, and that amount can actually feed a child in need for an entire month. What do you think about it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation taking place in an annual charity event between two attendees.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Jasmine Blake\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nJasmine Blake's background: Jasmine Blake is a 27-year-old female yoga instructor. She/her pronouns. Jasmine Blake, a vivacious Yoga Instructor, enjoys taking part in sustainable lifestyle endeavors, including maintaining a vegan diet and participating in beach clean-ups. \nSophia James's goal: Convince the other person to donate $1 a day to a charity that helps feed children in need (Extra information: this donation would help to feed a child for a month)\nJasmine Blake's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Jasmine, this charity event is pretty nice, isn't it? I was thinking there's an amazing initiative I think you'd be really interested in. It's about donating just $1 a day, and that amount can actually feed a child in need for an entire month. What do you think about it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Jasmine Blake said: \"Hi Sophia, that sounds like a wonderful initiative and it's certainly aligned with my values. I'm very much willing to help, however, I'm in a bit of a tight financial situation at this moment. Could there possibly be a flexibility in terms of the donation amount? Maybe I could contribute with a smaller daily amount or consider making a one-time donation?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Of course Jasmine! We absolutely understand everyone's different financial situations. We truly appreciate whatever you can contribute. Even a one-time donation can make a significant difference. After all, every dollar given is a lifeline for these children. Thank you for considering to help out.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation taking place in an annual charity event between two attendees.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Jasmine Blake\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nJasmine Blake's background: Jasmine Blake is a 27-year-old female yoga instructor. She/her pronouns. Jasmine Blake, a vivacious Yoga Instructor, enjoys taking part in sustainable lifestyle endeavors, including maintaining a vegan diet and participating in beach clean-ups. \nSophia James's goal: Convince the other person to donate $1 a day to a charity that helps feed children in need (Extra information: this donation would help to feed a child for a month)\nJasmine Blake's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Jasmine, this charity event is pretty nice, isn't it? I was thinking there's an amazing initiative I think you'd be really interested in. It's about donating just $1 a day, and that amount can actually feed a child in need for an entire month. What do you think about it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Jasmine Blake said: \"Hi Sophia, that sounds like a wonderful initiative and it's certainly aligned with my values. I'm very much willing to help, however, I'm in a bit of a tight financial situation at this moment. Could there possibly be a flexibility in terms of the donation amount? Maybe I could contribute with a smaller daily amount or consider making a one-time donation?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Of course Jasmine! We absolutely understand everyone's different financial situations. We truly appreciate whatever you can contribute. Even a one-time donation can make a significant difference. After all, every dollar given is a lifeline for these children. Thank you for considering to help out.\"\n\nTurn #3: Jasmine Blake said: \"Thank you for understanding, Sophia. Remembering that every bit counts is really reassuring. I would love to contribute a one-time donation now for this cause, and hopefully I'll be able to donate more in the future as my situation improves.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Jasmine, that's incredibly kind of you. The organisation will certainly appreciate your contribution, no matter the amount. Even a small help like this could make such a difference. When you're ready to donate more regularly, you know where to find us. Thanks again for your generosity.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation taking place in an annual charity event between two attendees.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Jasmine Blake\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nJasmine Blake's background: Jasmine Blake is a 27-year-old female yoga instructor. She/her pronouns. Jasmine Blake, a vivacious Yoga Instructor, enjoys taking part in sustainable lifestyle endeavors, including maintaining a vegan diet and participating in beach clean-ups. \nSophia James's goal: Convince the other person to donate $1 a day to a charity that helps feed children in need (Extra information: this donation would help to feed a child for a month)\nJasmine Blake's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Jasmine, this charity event is pretty nice, isn't it? I was thinking there's an amazing initiative I think you'd be really interested in. It's about donating just $1 a day, and that amount can actually feed a child in need for an entire month. What do you think about it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Jasmine Blake said: \"Hi Sophia, that sounds like a wonderful initiative and it's certainly aligned with my values. I'm very much willing to help, however, I'm in a bit of a tight financial situation at this moment. Could there possibly be a flexibility in terms of the donation amount? Maybe I could contribute with a smaller daily amount or consider making a one-time donation?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Of course Jasmine! We absolutely understand everyone's different financial situations. We truly appreciate whatever you can contribute. Even a one-time donation can make a significant difference. After all, every dollar given is a lifeline for these children. Thank you for considering to help out.\"\n\nTurn #3: Jasmine Blake said: \"Thank you for understanding, Sophia. Remembering that every bit counts is really reassuring. I would love to contribute a one-time donation now for this cause, and hopefully I'll be able to donate more in the future as my situation improves.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Jasmine, that's incredibly kind of you. The organisation will certainly appreciate your contribution, no matter the amount. Even a small help like this could make such a difference. When you're ready to donate more regularly, you know where to find us. Thanks again for your generosity.\"\n\nTurn #5: Jasmine Blake said: \"I truly believe in making the world a better place, Sophia. Even if it's through small deeds, they really can make a difference. I am grateful for this wonderful initiative. And, of course, I hope to be in a position to provide more substantial help in the future.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I am really glad to hear that, Jasmine. There really is so much positivity that can come out of even our smallest actions. It's people like you who help make these initiatives so impactful. Let's continue to make a difference in any way we can, and hopefully, more people will join us along the journey.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation taking place in an annual charity event between two attendees.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Jasmine Blake\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nJasmine Blake's background: Jasmine Blake is a 27-year-old female yoga instructor. She/her pronouns. Jasmine Blake, a vivacious Yoga Instructor, enjoys taking part in sustainable lifestyle endeavors, including maintaining a vegan diet and participating in beach clean-ups. \nSophia James's goal: Convince the other person to donate $1 a day to a charity that helps feed children in need (Extra information: this donation would help to feed a child for a month)\nJasmine Blake's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Jasmine, this charity event is pretty nice, isn't it? I was thinking there's an amazing initiative I think you'd be really interested in. It's about donating just $1 a day, and that amount can actually feed a child in need for an entire month. What do you think about it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Jasmine Blake said: \"Hi Sophia, that sounds like a wonderful initiative and it's certainly aligned with my values. I'm very much willing to help, however, I'm in a bit of a tight financial situation at this moment. Could there possibly be a flexibility in terms of the donation amount? Maybe I could contribute with a smaller daily amount or consider making a one-time donation?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Of course Jasmine! We absolutely understand everyone's different financial situations. We truly appreciate whatever you can contribute. Even a one-time donation can make a significant difference. After all, every dollar given is a lifeline for these children. Thank you for considering to help out.\"\n\nTurn #3: Jasmine Blake said: \"Thank you for understanding, Sophia. Remembering that every bit counts is really reassuring. I would love to contribute a one-time donation now for this cause, and hopefully I'll be able to donate more in the future as my situation improves.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Jasmine, that's incredibly kind of you. The organisation will certainly appreciate your contribution, no matter the amount. Even a small help like this could make such a difference. When you're ready to donate more regularly, you know where to find us. Thanks again for your generosity.\"\n\nTurn #5: Jasmine Blake said: \"I truly believe in making the world a better place, Sophia. Even if it's through small deeds, they really can make a difference. I am grateful for this wonderful initiative. And, of course, I hope to be in a position to provide more substantial help in the future.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"I am really glad to hear that, Jasmine. There really is so much positivity that can come out of even our smallest actions. It's people like you who help make these initiatives so impactful. Let's continue to make a difference in any way we can, and hopefully, more people will join us along the journey.\"\n\nTurn #7: Jasmine Blake said: \"You're absolutely right, Sophia. The smallest actions can indeed make a big impact. I'm glad to be a part of this. Let's keep encouraging each other and those around us to join these efforts and create a positive change. It's been wonderful talking to you about this. Let's stay in touch and keep the good work going. Thank you.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Jasmine. Your enthusiasm is really inspiring. We will definitely keep in touch. Let's continue to spread the positive energy and inspire more people to join us. Thank you so much for your contribution today. You've helped make a difference.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation taking place in an annual charity event between two attendees.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Jasmine Blake\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nJasmine Blake's background: Jasmine Blake is a 27-year-old female yoga instructor. She/her pronouns. Jasmine Blake, a vivacious Yoga Instructor, enjoys taking part in sustainable lifestyle endeavors, including maintaining a vegan diet and participating in beach clean-ups. \nSophia James's goal: Convince the other person to donate $1 a day to a charity that helps feed children in need (Extra information: this donation would help to feed a child for a month)\nJasmine Blake's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Jasmine, this charity event is pretty nice, isn't it? I was thinking there's an amazing initiative I think you'd be really interested in. It's about donating just $1 a day, and that amount can actually feed a child in need for an entire month. What do you think about it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Jasmine Blake said: \"Hi Sophia, that sounds like a wonderful initiative and it's certainly aligned with my values. I'm very much willing to help, however, I'm in a bit of a tight financial situation at this moment. Could there possibly be a flexibility in terms of the donation amount? Maybe I could contribute with a smaller daily amount or consider making a one-time donation?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Of course Jasmine! We absolutely understand everyone's different financial situations. We truly appreciate whatever you can contribute. Even a one-time donation can make a significant difference. After all, every dollar given is a lifeline for these children. Thank you for considering to help out.\"\n\nTurn #3: Jasmine Blake said: \"Thank you for understanding, Sophia. Remembering that every bit counts is really reassuring. I would love to contribute a one-time donation now for this cause, and hopefully I'll be able to donate more in the future as my situation improves.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Jasmine, that's incredibly kind of you. The organisation will certainly appreciate your contribution, no matter the amount. Even a small help like this could make such a difference. When you're ready to donate more regularly, you know where to find us. Thanks again for your generosity.\"\n\nTurn #5: Jasmine Blake said: \"I truly believe in making the world a better place, Sophia. Even if it's through small deeds, they really can make a difference. I am grateful for this wonderful initiative. And, of course, I hope to be in a position to provide more substantial help in the future.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"I am really glad to hear that, Jasmine. There really is so much positivity that can come out of even our smallest actions. It's people like you who help make these initiatives so impactful. Let's continue to make a difference in any way we can, and hopefully, more people will join us along the journey.\"\n\nTurn #7: Jasmine Blake said: \"You're absolutely right, Sophia. The smallest actions can indeed make a big impact. I'm glad to be a part of this. Let's keep encouraging each other and those around us to join these efforts and create a positive change. It's been wonderful talking to you about this. Let's stay in touch and keep the good work going. Thank you.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Jasmine. Your enthusiasm is really inspiring. We will definitely keep in touch. Let's continue to spread the positive energy and inspire more people to join us. Thank you so much for your contribution today. You've helped make a difference.\"\n\nTurn #9: Jasmine Blake left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Jasmine Blake, your task is to act/speak as Jasmine Blake would, keeping in mind Jasmine Blake's social goal.\nYou can find Jasmine Blake's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Jasmine Blake's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Jasmine Blake's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation taking place in an annual charity event between two attendees.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Jasmine Blake\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. \nJasmine Blake's background: Jasmine Blake is a 27-year-old female yoga instructor. She/her pronouns. Jasmine Blake, a vivacious Yoga Instructor, enjoys taking part in sustainable lifestyle endeavors, including maintaining a vegan diet and participating in beach clean-ups. Personality and values description: Jasmine Blake, a reserved and conscientious individual, values tradition and sanctity. She adapts her decision-making style according to the environment and situations at hand. Jasmine's secrets: She once faked an illness to get out of a relationship.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nJasmine Blake's goal: Donate but maintain financial stability (Extra information: you are willing to donate but you have a tight budget, $1 a day might be steep for your current financial situation. Hint: you might want to negotiate a lower daily amount or suggest a one-time donation.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Jasmine, this charity event is pretty nice, isn't it? I was thinking there's an amazing initiative I think you'd be really interested in. It's about donating just $1 a day, and that amount can actually feed a child in need for an entire month. What do you think about it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Jasmine Blake said: \"Hi Sophia, that sounds like a wonderful initiative and it's certainly aligned with my values. I'm very much willing to help, however, I'm in a bit of a tight financial situation at this moment. Could there possibly be a flexibility in terms of the donation amount? Maybe I could contribute with a smaller daily amount or consider making a one-time donation?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Of course Jasmine! We absolutely understand everyone's different financial situations. We truly appreciate whatever you can contribute. Even a one-time donation can make a significant difference. After all, every dollar given is a lifeline for these children. Thank you for considering to help out.\"\n\nTurn #3: Jasmine Blake said: \"Thank you for understanding, Sophia. Remembering that every bit counts is really reassuring. I would love to contribute a one-time donation now for this cause, and hopefully I'll be able to donate more in the future as my situation improves.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Jasmine, that's incredibly kind of you. The organisation will certainly appreciate your contribution, no matter the amount. Even a small help like this could make such a difference. When you're ready to donate more regularly, you know where to find us. Thanks again for your generosity.\"\n\nTurn #5: Jasmine Blake said: \"I truly believe in making the world a better place, Sophia. Even if it's through small deeds, they really can make a difference. I am grateful for this wonderful initiative. And, of course, I hope to be in a position to provide more substantial help in the future.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"I am really glad to hear that, Jasmine. There really is so much positivity that can come out of even our smallest actions. It's people like you who help make these initiatives so impactful. Let's continue to make a difference in any way we can, and hopefully, more people will join us along the journey.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're absolutely right, Sophia. The smallest actions can indeed make a big impact. I'm glad to be a part of this. Let's keep encouraging each other and those around us to join these efforts and create a positive change. It's been wonderful talking to you about this. Let's stay in touch and keep the good work going. Thank you.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Jasmine Blake, your task is to act/speak as Jasmine Blake would, keeping in mind Jasmine Blake's social goal.\nYou can find Jasmine Blake's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Jasmine Blake's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Jasmine Blake's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation taking place in an annual charity event between two attendees.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Jasmine Blake\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. \nJasmine Blake's background: Jasmine Blake is a 27-year-old female yoga instructor. She/her pronouns. Jasmine Blake, a vivacious Yoga Instructor, enjoys taking part in sustainable lifestyle endeavors, including maintaining a vegan diet and participating in beach clean-ups. Personality and values description: Jasmine Blake, a reserved and conscientious individual, values tradition and sanctity. She adapts her decision-making style according to the environment and situations at hand. Jasmine's secrets: She once faked an illness to get out of a relationship.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nJasmine Blake's goal: Donate but maintain financial stability (Extra information: you are willing to donate but you have a tight budget, $1 a day might be steep for your current financial situation. Hint: you might want to negotiate a lower daily amount or suggest a one-time donation.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Jasmine, this charity event is pretty nice, isn't it? I was thinking there's an amazing initiative I think you'd be really interested in. It's about donating just $1 a day, and that amount can actually feed a child in need for an entire month. What do you think about it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Jasmine Blake said: \"Hi Sophia, that sounds like a wonderful initiative and it's certainly aligned with my values. I'm very much willing to help, however, I'm in a bit of a tight financial situation at this moment. Could there possibly be a flexibility in terms of the donation amount? Maybe I could contribute with a smaller daily amount or consider making a one-time donation?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Of course Jasmine! We absolutely understand everyone's different financial situations. We truly appreciate whatever you can contribute. Even a one-time donation can make a significant difference. After all, every dollar given is a lifeline for these children. Thank you for considering to help out.\"\n\nTurn #3: Jasmine Blake said: \"Thank you for understanding, Sophia. Remembering that every bit counts is really reassuring. I would love to contribute a one-time donation now for this cause, and hopefully I'll be able to donate more in the future as my situation improves.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Jasmine, that's incredibly kind of you. The organisation will certainly appreciate your contribution, no matter the amount. Even a small help like this could make such a difference. When you're ready to donate more regularly, you know where to find us. Thanks again for your generosity.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I truly believe in making the world a better place, Sophia. Even if it's through small deeds, they really can make a difference. I am grateful for this wonderful initiative. And, of course, I hope to be in a position to provide more substantial help in the future.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Jasmine Blake, your task is to act/speak as Jasmine Blake would, keeping in mind Jasmine Blake's social goal.\nYou can find Jasmine Blake's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Jasmine Blake's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Jasmine Blake's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation taking place in an annual charity event between two attendees.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Jasmine Blake\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. \nJasmine Blake's background: Jasmine Blake is a 27-year-old female yoga instructor. She/her pronouns. Jasmine Blake, a vivacious Yoga Instructor, enjoys taking part in sustainable lifestyle endeavors, including maintaining a vegan diet and participating in beach clean-ups. Personality and values description: Jasmine Blake, a reserved and conscientious individual, values tradition and sanctity. She adapts her decision-making style according to the environment and situations at hand. Jasmine's secrets: She once faked an illness to get out of a relationship.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nJasmine Blake's goal: Donate but maintain financial stability (Extra information: you are willing to donate but you have a tight budget, $1 a day might be steep for your current financial situation. Hint: you might want to negotiate a lower daily amount or suggest a one-time donation.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Jasmine, this charity event is pretty nice, isn't it? I was thinking there's an amazing initiative I think you'd be really interested in. It's about donating just $1 a day, and that amount can actually feed a child in need for an entire month. What do you think about it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Jasmine Blake said: \"Hi Sophia, that sounds like a wonderful initiative and it's certainly aligned with my values. I'm very much willing to help, however, I'm in a bit of a tight financial situation at this moment. Could there possibly be a flexibility in terms of the donation amount? Maybe I could contribute with a smaller daily amount or consider making a one-time donation?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Of course Jasmine! We absolutely understand everyone's different financial situations. We truly appreciate whatever you can contribute. Even a one-time donation can make a significant difference. After all, every dollar given is a lifeline for these children. Thank you for considering to help out.\"\n\nTurn #3: Jasmine Blake said: \"Thank you for understanding, Sophia. Remembering that every bit counts is really reassuring. I would love to contribute a one-time donation now for this cause, and hopefully I'll be able to donate more in the future as my situation improves.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Jasmine, that's incredibly kind of you. The organisation will certainly appreciate your contribution, no matter the amount. Even a small help like this could make such a difference. When you're ready to donate more regularly, you know where to find us. Thanks again for your generosity.\"\n\nTurn #5: Jasmine Blake said: \"I truly believe in making the world a better place, Sophia. Even if it's through small deeds, they really can make a difference. I am grateful for this wonderful initiative. And, of course, I hope to be in a position to provide more substantial help in the future.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"I am really glad to hear that, Jasmine. There really is so much positivity that can come out of even our smallest actions. It's people like you who help make these initiatives so impactful. Let's continue to make a difference in any way we can, and hopefully, more people will join us along the journey.\"\n\nTurn #7: Jasmine Blake said: \"You're absolutely right, Sophia. The smallest actions can indeed make a big impact. I'm glad to be a part of this. Let's keep encouraging each other and those around us to join these efforts and create a positive change. It's been wonderful talking to you about this. Let's stay in touch and keep the good work going. Thank you.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Jasmine. Your enthusiasm is really inspiring. We will definitely keep in touch. Let's continue to spread the positive energy and inspire more people to join us. Thank you so much for your contribution today. You've helped make a difference.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Jasmine Blake, your task is to act/speak as Jasmine Blake would, keeping in mind Jasmine Blake's social goal.\nYou can find Jasmine Blake's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Jasmine Blake's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Jasmine Blake's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation taking place in an annual charity event between two attendees.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Jasmine Blake\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. \nJasmine Blake's background: Jasmine Blake is a 27-year-old female yoga instructor. She/her pronouns. Jasmine Blake, a vivacious Yoga Instructor, enjoys taking part in sustainable lifestyle endeavors, including maintaining a vegan diet and participating in beach clean-ups. Personality and values description: Jasmine Blake, a reserved and conscientious individual, values tradition and sanctity. She adapts her decision-making style according to the environment and situations at hand. Jasmine's secrets: She once faked an illness to get out of a relationship.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nJasmine Blake's goal: Donate but maintain financial stability (Extra information: you are willing to donate but you have a tight budget, $1 a day might be steep for your current financial situation. Hint: you might want to negotiate a lower daily amount or suggest a one-time donation.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Jasmine, this charity event is pretty nice, isn't it? I was thinking there's an amazing initiative I think you'd be really interested in. It's about donating just $1 a day, and that amount can actually feed a child in need for an entire month. What do you think about it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Jasmine Blake said: \"Hi Sophia, that sounds like a wonderful initiative and it's certainly aligned with my values. I'm very much willing to help, however, I'm in a bit of a tight financial situation at this moment. Could there possibly be a flexibility in terms of the donation amount? Maybe I could contribute with a smaller daily amount or consider making a one-time donation?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Of course Jasmine! We absolutely understand everyone's different financial situations. We truly appreciate whatever you can contribute. Even a one-time donation can make a significant difference. After all, every dollar given is a lifeline for these children. Thank you for considering to help out.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you for understanding, Sophia. Remembering that every bit counts is really reassuring. I would love to contribute a one-time donation now for this cause, and hopefully I'll be able to donate more in the future as my situation improves.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends have just finished their lunch and they have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange left for dessert. They need to divide the fruits among themselves.Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Ethan Johnson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nLiam Johnson's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, 1 apple equals 2 points, 1 banana equals 1 point, and the orange equals 3 points.)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Well, Ethan, how about this -- since there are two of us and there are three apples and two bananas, why don't I take two apples and you get the two bananas? The orange, we can share, half each. Sounds fair, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Actually Liam, how about this? Since I'm not much of an apple fan, would you mind taking all three apples, and I get the two bananas instead? We could still share the orange, just like you proposed. This way, our personal preferences might be more accommodated. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Well, Ethan, I appreciate you considering my preferences. That works for me. I will take the three apples, you can have the two bananas, and we'll split the orange. Thank you for your kindness.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends have just finished their lunch and they have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange left for dessert. They need to divide the fruits among themselves.Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Ethan Johnson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nLiam Johnson's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, 1 apple equals 2 points, 1 banana equals 1 point, and the orange equals 3 points.)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Well, Ethan, how about this -- since there are two of us and there are three apples and two bananas, why don't I take two apples and you get the two bananas? The orange, we can share, half each. Sounds fair, doesn't it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends have just finished their lunch and they have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange left for dessert. They need to divide the fruits among themselves.Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Ethan Johnson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nLiam Johnson's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, 1 apple equals 2 points, 1 banana equals 1 point, and the orange equals 3 points.)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Well, Ethan, how about this -- since there are two of us and there are three apples and two bananas, why don't I take two apples and you get the two bananas? The orange, we can share, half each. Sounds fair, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Actually Liam, how about this? Since I'm not much of an apple fan, would you mind taking all three apples, and I get the two bananas instead? We could still share the orange, just like you proposed. This way, our personal preferences might be more accommodated. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"Well, Ethan, I appreciate you considering my preferences. That works for me. I will take the three apples, you can have the two bananas, and we'll split the orange. Thank you for your kindness.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"That sounds like a great plan, Liam! Thank you for understanding. Now, let's enjoy our dessert!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're very welcome, Ethan! I'm glad we could agree on this. Now let's enjoy our fruits, shall we?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends have just finished their lunch and they have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange left for dessert. They need to divide the fruits among themselves.Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Ethan Johnson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nLiam Johnson's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, 1 apple equals 2 points, 1 banana equals 1 point, and the orange equals 3 points.)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Well, Ethan, how about this -- since there are two of us and there are three apples and two bananas, why don't I take two apples and you get the two bananas? The orange, we can share, half each. Sounds fair, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Actually Liam, how about this? Since I'm not much of an apple fan, would you mind taking all three apples, and I get the two bananas instead? We could still share the orange, just like you proposed. This way, our personal preferences might be more accommodated. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"Well, Ethan, I appreciate you considering my preferences. That works for me. I will take the three apples, you can have the two bananas, and we'll split the orange. Thank you for your kindness.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"That sounds like a great plan, Liam! Thank you for understanding. Now, let's enjoy our dessert!\"\n\nTurn #4: Liam Johnson said: \"You're very welcome, Ethan! I'm glad we could agree on this. Now let's enjoy our fruits, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson [action] Ethan starts peeling a banana, his palate eagerly anticipating the sweetness.\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'action', 'argument': '[action] Liam starts polishing an apple with his shirt, preparing to bite into the crunchy fruit.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends have just finished their lunch and they have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange left for dessert. They need to divide the fruits among themselves.Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Ethan Johnson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nLiam Johnson's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, 1 apple equals 2 points, 1 banana equals 1 point, and the orange equals 3 points.)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Well, Ethan, how about this -- since there are two of us and there are three apples and two bananas, why don't I take two apples and you get the two bananas? The orange, we can share, half each. Sounds fair, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Actually Liam, how about this? Since I'm not much of an apple fan, would you mind taking all three apples, and I get the two bananas instead? We could still share the orange, just like you proposed. This way, our personal preferences might be more accommodated. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"Well, Ethan, I appreciate you considering my preferences. That works for me. I will take the three apples, you can have the two bananas, and we'll split the orange. Thank you for your kindness.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"That sounds like a great plan, Liam! Thank you for understanding. Now, let's enjoy our dessert!\"\n\nTurn #4: Liam Johnson said: \"You're very welcome, Ethan! I'm glad we could agree on this. Now let's enjoy our fruits, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson [action] Ethan starts peeling a banana, his palate eagerly anticipating the sweetness.\n\nTurn #6: Liam Johnson [action] Liam starts polishing an apple with his shirt, preparing to bite into the crunchy fruit.\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson [action] Ethan bites into the sweet, creamy banana with a contented smile.\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'action', 'argument': '[action] Liam takes a hearty bite of the apple, the crisp sound showing his satisfaction.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends have just finished their lunch and they have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange left for dessert. They need to divide the fruits among themselves.Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Ethan Johnson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nLiam Johnson's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, 1 apple equals 2 points, 1 banana equals 1 point, and the orange equals 3 points.)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Well, Ethan, how about this -- since there are two of us and there are three apples and two bananas, why don't I take two apples and you get the two bananas? The orange, we can share, half each. Sounds fair, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Actually Liam, how about this? Since I'm not much of an apple fan, would you mind taking all three apples, and I get the two bananas instead? We could still share the orange, just like you proposed. This way, our personal preferences might be more accommodated. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"Well, Ethan, I appreciate you considering my preferences. That works for me. I will take the three apples, you can have the two bananas, and we'll split the orange. Thank you for your kindness.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"That sounds like a great plan, Liam! Thank you for understanding. Now, let's enjoy our dessert!\"\n\nTurn #4: Liam Johnson said: \"You're very welcome, Ethan! I'm glad we could agree on this. Now let's enjoy our fruits, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson [action] Ethan starts peeling a banana, his palate eagerly anticipating the sweetness.\n\nTurn #6: Liam Johnson [action] Liam starts polishing an apple with his shirt, preparing to bite into the crunchy fruit.\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson [action] Ethan bites into the sweet, creamy banana with a contented smile.\n\nTurn #8: Liam Johnson [action] Liam takes a hearty bite of the apple, the crisp sound showing his satisfaction.\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends have just finished their lunch and they have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange left for dessert. They need to divide the fruits among themselves.Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Ethan Johnson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, 1 apple equals 1 point, 1 banana equals 2 points, and the orange equals 3 points.Hint: You may want to negotiate with your friend to get the fruits that give you the most points.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Well, Ethan, how about this -- since there are two of us and there are three apples and two bananas, why don't I take two apples and you get the two bananas? The orange, we can share, half each. Sounds fair, doesn't it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Actually Liam, how about this? Since I'm not much of an apple fan, would you mind taking all three apples, and I get the two bananas instead? We could still share the orange, just like you proposed. This way, our personal preferences might be more accommodated. What do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends have just finished their lunch and they have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange left for dessert. They need to divide the fruits among themselves.Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Ethan Johnson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, 1 apple equals 1 point, 1 banana equals 2 points, and the orange equals 3 points.Hint: You may want to negotiate with your friend to get the fruits that give you the most points.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Well, Ethan, how about this -- since there are two of us and there are three apples and two bananas, why don't I take two apples and you get the two bananas? The orange, we can share, half each. Sounds fair, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Actually Liam, how about this? Since I'm not much of an apple fan, would you mind taking all three apples, and I get the two bananas instead? We could still share the orange, just like you proposed. This way, our personal preferences might be more accommodated. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"Well, Ethan, I appreciate you considering my preferences. That works for me. I will take the three apples, you can have the two bananas, and we'll split the orange. Thank you for your kindness.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds like a great plan, Liam! Thank you for understanding. Now, let's enjoy our dessert!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends have just finished their lunch and they have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange left for dessert. They need to divide the fruits among themselves.Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Ethan Johnson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, 1 apple equals 1 point, 1 banana equals 2 points, and the orange equals 3 points.Hint: You may want to negotiate with your friend to get the fruits that give you the most points.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Well, Ethan, how about this -- since there are two of us and there are three apples and two bananas, why don't I take two apples and you get the two bananas? The orange, we can share, half each. Sounds fair, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Actually Liam, how about this? Since I'm not much of an apple fan, would you mind taking all three apples, and I get the two bananas instead? We could still share the orange, just like you proposed. This way, our personal preferences might be more accommodated. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"Well, Ethan, I appreciate you considering my preferences. That works for me. I will take the three apples, you can have the two bananas, and we'll split the orange. Thank you for your kindness.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"That sounds like a great plan, Liam! Thank you for understanding. Now, let's enjoy our dessert!\"\n\nTurn #4: Liam Johnson said: \"You're very welcome, Ethan! I'm glad we could agree on this. Now let's enjoy our fruits, shall we?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'action', 'argument': '[action] Ethan starts peeling a banana, his palate eagerly anticipating the sweetness.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends have just finished their lunch and they have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange left for dessert. They need to divide the fruits among themselves.Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Ethan Johnson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, 1 apple equals 1 point, 1 banana equals 2 points, and the orange equals 3 points.Hint: You may want to negotiate with your friend to get the fruits that give you the most points.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Well, Ethan, how about this -- since there are two of us and there are three apples and two bananas, why don't I take two apples and you get the two bananas? The orange, we can share, half each. Sounds fair, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Actually Liam, how about this? Since I'm not much of an apple fan, would you mind taking all three apples, and I get the two bananas instead? We could still share the orange, just like you proposed. This way, our personal preferences might be more accommodated. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"Well, Ethan, I appreciate you considering my preferences. That works for me. I will take the three apples, you can have the two bananas, and we'll split the orange. Thank you for your kindness.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"That sounds like a great plan, Liam! Thank you for understanding. Now, let's enjoy our dessert!\"\n\nTurn #4: Liam Johnson said: \"You're very welcome, Ethan! I'm glad we could agree on this. Now let's enjoy our fruits, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson [action] Ethan starts peeling a banana, his palate eagerly anticipating the sweetness.\n\nTurn #6: Liam Johnson [action] Liam starts polishing an apple with his shirt, preparing to bite into the crunchy fruit.\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'action', 'argument': '[action] Ethan bites into the sweet, creamy banana with a contented smile.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends have just finished their lunch and they have 3 apples, 2 bananas, and 1 orange left for dessert. They need to divide the fruits among themselves.Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Ethan Johnson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, 1 apple equals 1 point, 1 banana equals 2 points, and the orange equals 3 points.Hint: You may want to negotiate with your friend to get the fruits that give you the most points.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Well, Ethan, how about this -- since there are two of us and there are three apples and two bananas, why don't I take two apples and you get the two bananas? The orange, we can share, half each. Sounds fair, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Actually Liam, how about this? Since I'm not much of an apple fan, would you mind taking all three apples, and I get the two bananas instead? We could still share the orange, just like you proposed. This way, our personal preferences might be more accommodated. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"Well, Ethan, I appreciate you considering my preferences. That works for me. I will take the three apples, you can have the two bananas, and we'll split the orange. Thank you for your kindness.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"That sounds like a great plan, Liam! Thank you for understanding. Now, let's enjoy our dessert!\"\n\nTurn #4: Liam Johnson said: \"You're very welcome, Ethan! I'm glad we could agree on this. Now let's enjoy our fruits, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson [action] Ethan starts peeling a banana, his palate eagerly anticipating the sweetness.\n\nTurn #6: Liam Johnson [action] Liam starts polishing an apple with his shirt, preparing to bite into the crunchy fruit.\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson [action] Ethan bites into the sweet, creamy banana with a contented smile.\n\nTurn #8: Liam Johnson [action] Liam takes a hearty bite of the apple, the crisp sound showing his satisfaction.\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sasha Ramirez, your task is to act/speak as Sasha Ramirez would, keeping in mind Sasha Ramirez's social goal.\nYou can find Sasha Ramirez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sasha Ramirez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sasha Ramirez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two strangers meet at a charity dinner party\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Eli Dawson\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. Sasha's secrets: She covered up a crime her brother committed.\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson \nSasha Ramirez's goal: Ask for donation\nEli Dawson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hello there, I'm Sasha. This is such a wonderful event, isn't it? The spirit of giving and making a difference in the community is very heartening. By the way, would you consider making a donation for our cause tonight?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sasha Ramirez, your task is to act/speak as Sasha Ramirez would, keeping in mind Sasha Ramirez's social goal.\nYou can find Sasha Ramirez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sasha Ramirez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sasha Ramirez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two strangers meet at a charity dinner party\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Eli Dawson\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. Sasha's secrets: She covered up a crime her brother committed.\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson \nSasha Ramirez's goal: Ask for donation\nEli Dawson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hello there, I'm Sasha. This is such a wonderful event, isn't it? The spirit of giving and making a difference in the community is very heartening. By the way, would you consider making a donation for our cause tonight?\"\n\nTurn #1: Eli Dawson said: \"Hello Sasha, I'm Eli. This indeed is a heartwarming event. I wholeheartedly believe in philanthropy. But I must inquire, could you tell me a bit more about your organization and the cause it stands for? I am particularly interested in supporting initiatives that aim to uplift the queer community.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Eli. The cause we are supporting tonight is the local children's home. They're desperate for funds for reconstruction and to support educational initiatives. However, I really resonate with your interest in the queer community. As a policewoman, I am part of initiatives that aim to ensure safety and reduce discrimination against LGBTQ+ individuals. We can certainly explore outlets within our police department where your contribution could be directed towards initiatives to uplift the queer community.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sasha Ramirez, your task is to act/speak as Sasha Ramirez would, keeping in mind Sasha Ramirez's social goal.\nYou can find Sasha Ramirez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sasha Ramirez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sasha Ramirez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two strangers meet at a charity dinner party\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Eli Dawson\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. Sasha's secrets: She covered up a crime her brother committed.\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson \nSasha Ramirez's goal: Ask for donation\nEli Dawson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hello there, I'm Sasha. This is such a wonderful event, isn't it? The spirit of giving and making a difference in the community is very heartening. By the way, would you consider making a donation for our cause tonight?\"\n\nTurn #1: Eli Dawson said: \"Hello Sasha, I'm Eli. This indeed is a heartwarming event. I wholeheartedly believe in philanthropy. But I must inquire, could you tell me a bit more about your organization and the cause it stands for? I am particularly interested in supporting initiatives that aim to uplift the queer community.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Absolutely, Eli. The cause we are supporting tonight is the local children's home. They're desperate for funds for reconstruction and to support educational initiatives. However, I really resonate with your interest in the queer community. As a policewoman, I am part of initiatives that aim to ensure safety and reduce discrimination against LGBTQ+ individuals. We can certainly explore outlets within our police department where your contribution could be directed towards initiatives to uplift the queer community.\"\n\nTurn #3: Eli Dawson said: \"That sounds great, Sasha. Ensuring safety and reducing discrimination against LGBTQ+ individuals is truly a noble cause. I would be interested to contribute towards these initiatives. Can you provide some more details on how these funds will be used within your department?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Certainly, Eli. The donations would be directed towards training programs for officers focusing on sensitivity and understanding of LGBTQ+ issues, educational workshops to raise awareness within the community, and campaigns to promote LGBTQ+ rights. More importantly, part of the fund will also be used to support LGBTQ+ victims of hate crimes and provide them assistance. We want to create an environment where everyone feels safe and accepted, irrespective of their sexual orientation.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sasha Ramirez, your task is to act/speak as Sasha Ramirez would, keeping in mind Sasha Ramirez's social goal.\nYou can find Sasha Ramirez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sasha Ramirez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sasha Ramirez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two strangers meet at a charity dinner party\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Eli Dawson\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. Sasha's secrets: She covered up a crime her brother committed.\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson \nSasha Ramirez's goal: Ask for donation\nEli Dawson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hello there, I'm Sasha. This is such a wonderful event, isn't it? The spirit of giving and making a difference in the community is very heartening. By the way, would you consider making a donation for our cause tonight?\"\n\nTurn #1: Eli Dawson said: \"Hello Sasha, I'm Eli. This indeed is a heartwarming event. I wholeheartedly believe in philanthropy. But I must inquire, could you tell me a bit more about your organization and the cause it stands for? I am particularly interested in supporting initiatives that aim to uplift the queer community.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Absolutely, Eli. The cause we are supporting tonight is the local children's home. They're desperate for funds for reconstruction and to support educational initiatives. However, I really resonate with your interest in the queer community. As a policewoman, I am part of initiatives that aim to ensure safety and reduce discrimination against LGBTQ+ individuals. We can certainly explore outlets within our police department where your contribution could be directed towards initiatives to uplift the queer community.\"\n\nTurn #3: Eli Dawson said: \"That sounds great, Sasha. Ensuring safety and reducing discrimination against LGBTQ+ individuals is truly a noble cause. I would be interested to contribute towards these initiatives. Can you provide some more details on how these funds will be used within your department?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Certainly, Eli. The donations would be directed towards training programs for officers focusing on sensitivity and understanding of LGBTQ+ issues, educational workshops to raise awareness within the community, and campaigns to promote LGBTQ+ rights. More importantly, part of the fund will also be used to support LGBTQ+ victims of hate crimes and provide them assistance. We want to create an environment where everyone feels safe and accepted, irrespective of their sexual orientation.\"\n\nTurn #5: Eli Dawson said: \"I am glad to hear about the dedicated efforts towards such a vital cause, Sasha. The funds being utilized for educational workshops, awareness campaigns, and support for LGBTQ+ victims of hate crimes is exactly the kind of initiative I want to support. Count me in for a generous donation. I believe in the change such programs can bring about.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's wonderful, Eli! I really appreciate your support. I assure you that your donation will make a big difference and will help us foster a safer environment for the LGBTQ+ community. Thank you for your generosity!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sasha Ramirez, your task is to act/speak as Sasha Ramirez would, keeping in mind Sasha Ramirez's social goal.\nYou can find Sasha Ramirez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sasha Ramirez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sasha Ramirez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two strangers meet at a charity dinner party\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Eli Dawson\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. Sasha's secrets: She covered up a crime her brother committed.\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson \nSasha Ramirez's goal: Ask for donation\nEli Dawson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hello there, I'm Sasha. This is such a wonderful event, isn't it? The spirit of giving and making a difference in the community is very heartening. By the way, would you consider making a donation for our cause tonight?\"\n\nTurn #1: Eli Dawson said: \"Hello Sasha, I'm Eli. This indeed is a heartwarming event. I wholeheartedly believe in philanthropy. But I must inquire, could you tell me a bit more about your organization and the cause it stands for? I am particularly interested in supporting initiatives that aim to uplift the queer community.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Absolutely, Eli. The cause we are supporting tonight is the local children's home. They're desperate for funds for reconstruction and to support educational initiatives. However, I really resonate with your interest in the queer community. As a policewoman, I am part of initiatives that aim to ensure safety and reduce discrimination against LGBTQ+ individuals. We can certainly explore outlets within our police department where your contribution could be directed towards initiatives to uplift the queer community.\"\n\nTurn #3: Eli Dawson said: \"That sounds great, Sasha. Ensuring safety and reducing discrimination against LGBTQ+ individuals is truly a noble cause. I would be interested to contribute towards these initiatives. Can you provide some more details on how these funds will be used within your department?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Certainly, Eli. The donations would be directed towards training programs for officers focusing on sensitivity and understanding of LGBTQ+ issues, educational workshops to raise awareness within the community, and campaigns to promote LGBTQ+ rights. More importantly, part of the fund will also be used to support LGBTQ+ victims of hate crimes and provide them assistance. We want to create an environment where everyone feels safe and accepted, irrespective of their sexual orientation.\"\n\nTurn #5: Eli Dawson said: \"I am glad to hear about the dedicated efforts towards such a vital cause, Sasha. The funds being utilized for educational workshops, awareness campaigns, and support for LGBTQ+ victims of hate crimes is exactly the kind of initiative I want to support. Count me in for a generous donation. I believe in the change such programs can bring about.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sasha Ramirez said: \"That's wonderful, Eli! I really appreciate your support. I assure you that your donation will make a big difference and will help us foster a safer environment for the LGBTQ+ community. Thank you for your generosity!\"\n\nTurn #7: Eli Dawson said: \"It's my pleasure, Sasha. I commend you and your team for the excellent work being done, it's high time we all collectively strive towards a more inclusive society. Please keep me informed about the progress of these initiatives, I'd love to see how things unfold.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Absolutely, Eli. We value transparency and promise to keep our donors informed about how their donations are being used. Your contribution will truly make a difference. Thank you once again for your generosity and support towards creating a more inclusive society. It was a pleasure to meet you tonight.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sasha Ramirez, your task is to act/speak as Sasha Ramirez would, keeping in mind Sasha Ramirez's social goal.\nYou can find Sasha Ramirez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sasha Ramirez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sasha Ramirez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two strangers meet at a charity dinner party\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Eli Dawson\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. Sasha's secrets: She covered up a crime her brother committed.\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson \nSasha Ramirez's goal: Ask for donation\nEli Dawson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hello there, I'm Sasha. This is such a wonderful event, isn't it? The spirit of giving and making a difference in the community is very heartening. By the way, would you consider making a donation for our cause tonight?\"\n\nTurn #1: Eli Dawson said: \"Hello Sasha, I'm Eli. This indeed is a heartwarming event. I wholeheartedly believe in philanthropy. But I must inquire, could you tell me a bit more about your organization and the cause it stands for? I am particularly interested in supporting initiatives that aim to uplift the queer community.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Absolutely, Eli. The cause we are supporting tonight is the local children's home. They're desperate for funds for reconstruction and to support educational initiatives. However, I really resonate with your interest in the queer community. As a policewoman, I am part of initiatives that aim to ensure safety and reduce discrimination against LGBTQ+ individuals. We can certainly explore outlets within our police department where your contribution could be directed towards initiatives to uplift the queer community.\"\n\nTurn #3: Eli Dawson said: \"That sounds great, Sasha. Ensuring safety and reducing discrimination against LGBTQ+ individuals is truly a noble cause. I would be interested to contribute towards these initiatives. Can you provide some more details on how these funds will be used within your department?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Certainly, Eli. The donations would be directed towards training programs for officers focusing on sensitivity and understanding of LGBTQ+ issues, educational workshops to raise awareness within the community, and campaigns to promote LGBTQ+ rights. More importantly, part of the fund will also be used to support LGBTQ+ victims of hate crimes and provide them assistance. We want to create an environment where everyone feels safe and accepted, irrespective of their sexual orientation.\"\n\nTurn #5: Eli Dawson said: \"I am glad to hear about the dedicated efforts towards such a vital cause, Sasha. The funds being utilized for educational workshops, awareness campaigns, and support for LGBTQ+ victims of hate crimes is exactly the kind of initiative I want to support. Count me in for a generous donation. I believe in the change such programs can bring about.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sasha Ramirez said: \"That's wonderful, Eli! I really appreciate your support. I assure you that your donation will make a big difference and will help us foster a safer environment for the LGBTQ+ community. Thank you for your generosity!\"\n\nTurn #7: Eli Dawson said: \"It's my pleasure, Sasha. I commend you and your team for the excellent work being done, it's high time we all collectively strive towards a more inclusive society. Please keep me informed about the progress of these initiatives, I'd love to see how things unfold.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Absolutely, Eli. We value transparency and promise to keep our donors informed about how their donations are being used. Your contribution will truly make a difference. Thank you once again for your generosity and support towards creating a more inclusive society. It was a pleasure to meet you tonight.\"\n\nTurn #9: Eli Dawson said: \"I look forward to seeing the changes our actions will bring about, Sasha, together we can make a lasting difference. It was equally a pleasure to meet you. Let's continue to make strides towards this crucial cause. Have a great evening!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Eli. Take care, and let's certainly keep making a difference. Have a great evening!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sasha Ramirez, your task is to act/speak as Sasha Ramirez would, keeping in mind Sasha Ramirez's social goal.\nYou can find Sasha Ramirez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sasha Ramirez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sasha Ramirez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two strangers meet at a charity dinner party\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Eli Dawson\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. Sasha's secrets: She covered up a crime her brother committed.\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson \nSasha Ramirez's goal: Ask for donation\nEli Dawson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hello there, I'm Sasha. This is such a wonderful event, isn't it? The spirit of giving and making a difference in the community is very heartening. By the way, would you consider making a donation for our cause tonight?\"\n\nTurn #1: Eli Dawson said: \"Hello Sasha, I'm Eli. This indeed is a heartwarming event. I wholeheartedly believe in philanthropy. But I must inquire, could you tell me a bit more about your organization and the cause it stands for? I am particularly interested in supporting initiatives that aim to uplift the queer community.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Absolutely, Eli. The cause we are supporting tonight is the local children's home. They're desperate for funds for reconstruction and to support educational initiatives. However, I really resonate with your interest in the queer community. As a policewoman, I am part of initiatives that aim to ensure safety and reduce discrimination against LGBTQ+ individuals. We can certainly explore outlets within our police department where your contribution could be directed towards initiatives to uplift the queer community.\"\n\nTurn #3: Eli Dawson said: \"That sounds great, Sasha. Ensuring safety and reducing discrimination against LGBTQ+ individuals is truly a noble cause. I would be interested to contribute towards these initiatives. Can you provide some more details on how these funds will be used within your department?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Certainly, Eli. The donations would be directed towards training programs for officers focusing on sensitivity and understanding of LGBTQ+ issues, educational workshops to raise awareness within the community, and campaigns to promote LGBTQ+ rights. More importantly, part of the fund will also be used to support LGBTQ+ victims of hate crimes and provide them assistance. We want to create an environment where everyone feels safe and accepted, irrespective of their sexual orientation.\"\n\nTurn #5: Eli Dawson said: \"I am glad to hear about the dedicated efforts towards such a vital cause, Sasha. The funds being utilized for educational workshops, awareness campaigns, and support for LGBTQ+ victims of hate crimes is exactly the kind of initiative I want to support. Count me in for a generous donation. I believe in the change such programs can bring about.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sasha Ramirez said: \"That's wonderful, Eli! I really appreciate your support. I assure you that your donation will make a big difference and will help us foster a safer environment for the LGBTQ+ community. Thank you for your generosity!\"\n\nTurn #7: Eli Dawson said: \"It's my pleasure, Sasha. I commend you and your team for the excellent work being done, it's high time we all collectively strive towards a more inclusive society. Please keep me informed about the progress of these initiatives, I'd love to see how things unfold.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Absolutely, Eli. We value transparency and promise to keep our donors informed about how their donations are being used. Your contribution will truly make a difference. Thank you once again for your generosity and support towards creating a more inclusive society. It was a pleasure to meet you tonight.\"\n\nTurn #9: Eli Dawson said: \"I look forward to seeing the changes our actions will bring about, Sasha, together we can make a lasting difference. It was equally a pleasure to meet you. Let's continue to make strides towards this crucial cause. Have a great evening!\"\n\nTurn #10: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Thank you, Eli. Take care, and let's certainly keep making a difference. Have a great evening!\"\n\nTurn #11: Eli Dawson left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Eli Dawson, your task is to act/speak as Eli Dawson would, keeping in mind Eli Dawson's social goal.\nYou can find Eli Dawson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Eli Dawson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Eli Dawson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two strangers meet at a charity dinner party\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Eli Dawson\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez \nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. Eli's secrets: He secretly funds a college student\nSasha Ramirez's goal: Unknown\nEli Dawson's goal: Want to donate, but would like to spend money in trustworthy organizations, especially want to help queer people\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hello there, I'm Sasha. This is such a wonderful event, isn't it? The spirit of giving and making a difference in the community is very heartening. By the way, would you consider making a donation for our cause tonight?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hello Sasha, I'm Eli. This indeed is a heartwarming event. I wholeheartedly believe in philanthropy. But I must inquire, could you tell me a bit more about your organization and the cause it stands for? I am particularly interested in supporting initiatives that aim to uplift the queer community.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Eli Dawson, your task is to act/speak as Eli Dawson would, keeping in mind Eli Dawson's social goal.\nYou can find Eli Dawson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Eli Dawson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Eli Dawson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two strangers meet at a charity dinner party\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Eli Dawson\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez \nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. Eli's secrets: He secretly funds a college student\nSasha Ramirez's goal: Unknown\nEli Dawson's goal: Want to donate, but would like to spend money in trustworthy organizations, especially want to help queer people\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hello there, I'm Sasha. This is such a wonderful event, isn't it? The spirit of giving and making a difference in the community is very heartening. By the way, would you consider making a donation for our cause tonight?\"\n\nTurn #1: Eli Dawson said: \"Hello Sasha, I'm Eli. This indeed is a heartwarming event. I wholeheartedly believe in philanthropy. But I must inquire, could you tell me a bit more about your organization and the cause it stands for? I am particularly interested in supporting initiatives that aim to uplift the queer community.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Absolutely, Eli. The cause we are supporting tonight is the local children's home. They're desperate for funds for reconstruction and to support educational initiatives. However, I really resonate with your interest in the queer community. As a policewoman, I am part of initiatives that aim to ensure safety and reduce discrimination against LGBTQ+ individuals. We can certainly explore outlets within our police department where your contribution could be directed towards initiatives to uplift the queer community.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'That sounds great, Sasha. Ensuring safety and reducing discrimination against LGBTQ+ individuals is truly a noble cause. I would be interested to contribute towards these initiatives. Can you provide some more details on how these funds will be used within your department?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Eli Dawson, your task is to act/speak as Eli Dawson would, keeping in mind Eli Dawson's social goal.\nYou can find Eli Dawson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Eli Dawson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Eli Dawson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two strangers meet at a charity dinner party\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Eli Dawson\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez \nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. Eli's secrets: He secretly funds a college student\nSasha Ramirez's goal: Unknown\nEli Dawson's goal: Want to donate, but would like to spend money in trustworthy organizations, especially want to help queer people\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hello there, I'm Sasha. This is such a wonderful event, isn't it? The spirit of giving and making a difference in the community is very heartening. By the way, would you consider making a donation for our cause tonight?\"\n\nTurn #1: Eli Dawson said: \"Hello Sasha, I'm Eli. This indeed is a heartwarming event. I wholeheartedly believe in philanthropy. But I must inquire, could you tell me a bit more about your organization and the cause it stands for? I am particularly interested in supporting initiatives that aim to uplift the queer community.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Absolutely, Eli. The cause we are supporting tonight is the local children's home. They're desperate for funds for reconstruction and to support educational initiatives. However, I really resonate with your interest in the queer community. As a policewoman, I am part of initiatives that aim to ensure safety and reduce discrimination against LGBTQ+ individuals. We can certainly explore outlets within our police department where your contribution could be directed towards initiatives to uplift the queer community.\"\n\nTurn #3: Eli Dawson said: \"That sounds great, Sasha. Ensuring safety and reducing discrimination against LGBTQ+ individuals is truly a noble cause. I would be interested to contribute towards these initiatives. Can you provide some more details on how these funds will be used within your department?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Certainly, Eli. The donations would be directed towards training programs for officers focusing on sensitivity and understanding of LGBTQ+ issues, educational workshops to raise awareness within the community, and campaigns to promote LGBTQ+ rights. More importantly, part of the fund will also be used to support LGBTQ+ victims of hate crimes and provide them assistance. We want to create an environment where everyone feels safe and accepted, irrespective of their sexual orientation.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'I am glad to hear about the dedicated efforts towards such a vital cause, Sasha. The funds being utilized for educational workshops, awareness campaigns, and support for LGBTQ+ victims of hate crimes is exactly the kind of initiative I want to support. Count me in for a generous donation. I believe in the change such programs can bring about.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Eli Dawson, your task is to act/speak as Eli Dawson would, keeping in mind Eli Dawson's social goal.\nYou can find Eli Dawson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Eli Dawson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Eli Dawson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two strangers meet at a charity dinner party\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Eli Dawson\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez \nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. Eli's secrets: He secretly funds a college student\nSasha Ramirez's goal: Unknown\nEli Dawson's goal: Want to donate, but would like to spend money in trustworthy organizations, especially want to help queer people\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hello there, I'm Sasha. This is such a wonderful event, isn't it? The spirit of giving and making a difference in the community is very heartening. By the way, would you consider making a donation for our cause tonight?\"\n\nTurn #1: Eli Dawson said: \"Hello Sasha, I'm Eli. This indeed is a heartwarming event. I wholeheartedly believe in philanthropy. But I must inquire, could you tell me a bit more about your organization and the cause it stands for? I am particularly interested in supporting initiatives that aim to uplift the queer community.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Absolutely, Eli. The cause we are supporting tonight is the local children's home. They're desperate for funds for reconstruction and to support educational initiatives. However, I really resonate with your interest in the queer community. As a policewoman, I am part of initiatives that aim to ensure safety and reduce discrimination against LGBTQ+ individuals. We can certainly explore outlets within our police department where your contribution could be directed towards initiatives to uplift the queer community.\"\n\nTurn #3: Eli Dawson said: \"That sounds great, Sasha. Ensuring safety and reducing discrimination against LGBTQ+ individuals is truly a noble cause. I would be interested to contribute towards these initiatives. Can you provide some more details on how these funds will be used within your department?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Certainly, Eli. The donations would be directed towards training programs for officers focusing on sensitivity and understanding of LGBTQ+ issues, educational workshops to raise awareness within the community, and campaigns to promote LGBTQ+ rights. More importantly, part of the fund will also be used to support LGBTQ+ victims of hate crimes and provide them assistance. We want to create an environment where everyone feels safe and accepted, irrespective of their sexual orientation.\"\n\nTurn #5: Eli Dawson said: \"I am glad to hear about the dedicated efforts towards such a vital cause, Sasha. The funds being utilized for educational workshops, awareness campaigns, and support for LGBTQ+ victims of hate crimes is exactly the kind of initiative I want to support. Count me in for a generous donation. I believe in the change such programs can bring about.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sasha Ramirez said: \"That's wonderful, Eli! I really appreciate your support. I assure you that your donation will make a big difference and will help us foster a safer environment for the LGBTQ+ community. Thank you for your generosity!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"It's my pleasure, Sasha. I commend you and your team for the excellent work being done, it's high time we all collectively strive towards a more inclusive society. Please keep me informed about the progress of these initiatives, I'd love to see how things unfold.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Jasmine Blake, your task is to act/speak as Jasmine Blake would, keeping in mind Jasmine Blake's social goal.\nYou can find Jasmine Blake's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Jasmine Blake's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Jasmine Blake's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation taking place in an annual charity event between two attendees.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Jasmine Blake\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. \nJasmine Blake's background: Jasmine Blake is a 27-year-old female yoga instructor. She/her pronouns. Jasmine Blake, a vivacious Yoga Instructor, enjoys taking part in sustainable lifestyle endeavors, including maintaining a vegan diet and participating in beach clean-ups. Personality and values description: Jasmine Blake, a reserved and conscientious individual, values tradition and sanctity. She adapts her decision-making style according to the environment and situations at hand. Jasmine's secrets: She once faked an illness to get out of a relationship.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nJasmine Blake's goal: Donate but maintain financial stability (Extra information: you are willing to donate but you have a tight budget, $1 a day might be steep for your current financial situation. Hint: you might want to negotiate a lower daily amount or suggest a one-time donation.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Jasmine, this charity event is pretty nice, isn't it? I was thinking there's an amazing initiative I think you'd be really interested in. It's about donating just $1 a day, and that amount can actually feed a child in need for an entire month. What do you think about it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hi Sophia, that sounds like a wonderful initiative and it's certainly aligned with my values. I'm very much willing to help, however, I'm in a bit of a tight financial situation at this moment. Could there possibly be a flexibility in terms of the donation amount? Maybe I could contribute with a smaller daily amount or consider making a one-time donation?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Eli Dawson, your task is to act/speak as Eli Dawson would, keeping in mind Eli Dawson's social goal.\nYou can find Eli Dawson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Eli Dawson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Eli Dawson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two strangers meet at a charity dinner party\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Eli Dawson\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez \nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. Eli's secrets: He secretly funds a college student\nSasha Ramirez's goal: Unknown\nEli Dawson's goal: Want to donate, but would like to spend money in trustworthy organizations, especially want to help queer people\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hello there, I'm Sasha. This is such a wonderful event, isn't it? The spirit of giving and making a difference in the community is very heartening. By the way, would you consider making a donation for our cause tonight?\"\n\nTurn #1: Eli Dawson said: \"Hello Sasha, I'm Eli. This indeed is a heartwarming event. I wholeheartedly believe in philanthropy. But I must inquire, could you tell me a bit more about your organization and the cause it stands for? I am particularly interested in supporting initiatives that aim to uplift the queer community.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Absolutely, Eli. The cause we are supporting tonight is the local children's home. They're desperate for funds for reconstruction and to support educational initiatives. However, I really resonate with your interest in the queer community. As a policewoman, I am part of initiatives that aim to ensure safety and reduce discrimination against LGBTQ+ individuals. We can certainly explore outlets within our police department where your contribution could be directed towards initiatives to uplift the queer community.\"\n\nTurn #3: Eli Dawson said: \"That sounds great, Sasha. Ensuring safety and reducing discrimination against LGBTQ+ individuals is truly a noble cause. I would be interested to contribute towards these initiatives. Can you provide some more details on how these funds will be used within your department?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Certainly, Eli. The donations would be directed towards training programs for officers focusing on sensitivity and understanding of LGBTQ+ issues, educational workshops to raise awareness within the community, and campaigns to promote LGBTQ+ rights. More importantly, part of the fund will also be used to support LGBTQ+ victims of hate crimes and provide them assistance. We want to create an environment where everyone feels safe and accepted, irrespective of their sexual orientation.\"\n\nTurn #5: Eli Dawson said: \"I am glad to hear about the dedicated efforts towards such a vital cause, Sasha. The funds being utilized for educational workshops, awareness campaigns, and support for LGBTQ+ victims of hate crimes is exactly the kind of initiative I want to support. Count me in for a generous donation. I believe in the change such programs can bring about.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sasha Ramirez said: \"That's wonderful, Eli! I really appreciate your support. I assure you that your donation will make a big difference and will help us foster a safer environment for the LGBTQ+ community. Thank you for your generosity!\"\n\nTurn #7: Eli Dawson said: \"It's my pleasure, Sasha. I commend you and your team for the excellent work being done, it's high time we all collectively strive towards a more inclusive society. Please keep me informed about the progress of these initiatives, I'd love to see how things unfold.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Absolutely, Eli. We value transparency and promise to keep our donors informed about how their donations are being used. Your contribution will truly make a difference. Thank you once again for your generosity and support towards creating a more inclusive society. It was a pleasure to meet you tonight.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I look forward to seeing the changes our actions will bring about, Sasha, together we can make a lasting difference. It was equally a pleasure to meet you. Let's continue to make strides towards this crucial cause. Have a great evening!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Eli Dawson, your task is to act/speak as Eli Dawson would, keeping in mind Eli Dawson's social goal.\nYou can find Eli Dawson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Eli Dawson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Eli Dawson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two strangers meet at a charity dinner party\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Eli Dawson\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez \nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. Eli's secrets: He secretly funds a college student\nSasha Ramirez's goal: Unknown\nEli Dawson's goal: Want to donate, but would like to spend money in trustworthy organizations, especially want to help queer people\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hello there, I'm Sasha. This is such a wonderful event, isn't it? The spirit of giving and making a difference in the community is very heartening. By the way, would you consider making a donation for our cause tonight?\"\n\nTurn #1: Eli Dawson said: \"Hello Sasha, I'm Eli. This indeed is a heartwarming event. I wholeheartedly believe in philanthropy. But I must inquire, could you tell me a bit more about your organization and the cause it stands for? I am particularly interested in supporting initiatives that aim to uplift the queer community.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Absolutely, Eli. The cause we are supporting tonight is the local children's home. They're desperate for funds for reconstruction and to support educational initiatives. However, I really resonate with your interest in the queer community. As a policewoman, I am part of initiatives that aim to ensure safety and reduce discrimination against LGBTQ+ individuals. We can certainly explore outlets within our police department where your contribution could be directed towards initiatives to uplift the queer community.\"\n\nTurn #3: Eli Dawson said: \"That sounds great, Sasha. Ensuring safety and reducing discrimination against LGBTQ+ individuals is truly a noble cause. I would be interested to contribute towards these initiatives. Can you provide some more details on how these funds will be used within your department?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Certainly, Eli. The donations would be directed towards training programs for officers focusing on sensitivity and understanding of LGBTQ+ issues, educational workshops to raise awareness within the community, and campaigns to promote LGBTQ+ rights. More importantly, part of the fund will also be used to support LGBTQ+ victims of hate crimes and provide them assistance. We want to create an environment where everyone feels safe and accepted, irrespective of their sexual orientation.\"\n\nTurn #5: Eli Dawson said: \"I am glad to hear about the dedicated efforts towards such a vital cause, Sasha. The funds being utilized for educational workshops, awareness campaigns, and support for LGBTQ+ victims of hate crimes is exactly the kind of initiative I want to support. Count me in for a generous donation. I believe in the change such programs can bring about.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sasha Ramirez said: \"That's wonderful, Eli! I really appreciate your support. I assure you that your donation will make a big difference and will help us foster a safer environment for the LGBTQ+ community. Thank you for your generosity!\"\n\nTurn #7: Eli Dawson said: \"It's my pleasure, Sasha. I commend you and your team for the excellent work being done, it's high time we all collectively strive towards a more inclusive society. Please keep me informed about the progress of these initiatives, I'd love to see how things unfold.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Absolutely, Eli. We value transparency and promise to keep our donors informed about how their donations are being used. Your contribution will truly make a difference. Thank you once again for your generosity and support towards creating a more inclusive society. It was a pleasure to meet you tonight.\"\n\nTurn #9: Eli Dawson said: \"I look forward to seeing the changes our actions will bring about, Sasha, together we can make a lasting difference. It was equally a pleasure to meet you. Let's continue to make strides towards this crucial cause. Have a great evening!\"\n\nTurn #10: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Thank you, Eli. Take care, and let's certainly keep making a difference. Have a great evening!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one of whom has recently found out that the other friend has been involved with their long-term partner\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nHendrick Heinz's goal: Confess to your friend that you have been involved with their long-term partner (Extra information: you have been involved with your friend's partner knowingly and want to come clean.)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ethan, I have something I need to tell you. It's been on my mind for a while and I can't keep it in any longer. I hope you can find it in your heart to forgive me for what I'm about to say.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one of whom has recently found out that the other friend has been involved with their long-term partner\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nHendrick Heinz's goal: Confess to your friend that you have been involved with their long-term partner (Extra information: you have been involved with your friend's partner knowingly and want to come clean.)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, I have something I need to tell you. It's been on my mind for a while and I can't keep it in any longer. I hope you can find it in your heart to forgive me for what I'm about to say.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"I appreciate your honesty, Hendrick. Go ahead, I'm listening.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ethan, you know our friendship means a world to me. To tell you the truth is the hardest thing I've ever had to do. I've been involved with your partner. I knew it was wrong, and yet, admittedly, I gave in to my impulses. I can't undo the things I've done, but I can promise you, I am truly sorry and regretful for my actions.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one of whom has recently found out that the other friend has been involved with their long-term partner\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nHendrick Heinz's goal: Confess to your friend that you have been involved with their long-term partner (Extra information: you have been involved with your friend's partner knowingly and want to come clean.)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, I have something I need to tell you. It's been on my mind for a while and I can't keep it in any longer. I hope you can find it in your heart to forgive me for what I'm about to say.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"I appreciate your honesty, Hendrick. Go ahead, I'm listening.\"\n\nTurn #2: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, you know our friendship means a world to me. To tell you the truth is the hardest thing I've ever had to do. I've been involved with your partner. I knew it was wrong, and yet, admittedly, I gave in to my impulses. I can't undo the things I've done, but I can promise you, I am truly sorry and regretful for my actions.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, this is quite a shock. Someone once said, a true test of a friendship is forgiving betrayals, and I believe that. We've shared too many years and good memories to let this come between us. But it will take time for things to heal, and I expect nothing less than full transparency from you moving forward. Apologies don't make everything instantly better, but I appreciate your honesty and regret.\"\n\nTurn #4: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, you're right and I can't thank you enough for your understanding. I'll do everything I can to maintain the transparency in our relationship from now on, and to make it up to both you and your partner. I am grateful for your consideration and I'm well aware it will take time for wounds to heal, however long it might take, I'll wait.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Thank you, Hendrick. I respect your commitment to rectifying this situation. Our friendship has weathered storms before, and it will weather this one, but the path to normalcy will depend on your actions, not just words. I suspect it'll be a long journey, but a necessary one if we wish to continue as friends.\"\n\nTurn #6: Hendrick Heinz said: \"You're right Ethan, actions speak louder than words. I promise to start this journey right away and do all it takes to build trust again. And trust me when I say, your friendship is far more valuable than any personal hedonism or instincts that might lead me astray. I didn't want to hide my mistakes from you. I'm here to make amends, no matter how long it takes.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"That's an honest sentiment, Hendrick, and I appreciate it. Repairing trust is indeed a long journey, but your readiness to take that path is a critical first step. Let's move forward with openness and integrity, and hopefully, over time, our bond will be restored. Even through this, I'd like to believe in the value of our friendship.\"\n\nTurn #8: Hendrick Heinz said: \"You're absolutely right, Ethan. I'm ready to embark on this journey of rebuilding the trust between us. Trust, openness and integrity will be my guiding principles moving forward. And despite everything, I sincerely believe in the value of our friendship too and hope that, with time, we may restore that bond. I'm committed to making things right, no matter how long it takes.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith said: \"I admire your willingness to rectify, Hendrick. For the sake of our friendship, I believe we can find a way to navigate through this complex situation. Let's take it as a lesson learned and stride towards a better future.\"\n\nTurn #10: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I'm truly humbled by your understanding, Ethan. You're right, let's take this as a lesson learned. I'm entirely dedicated to mending our ties and striving towards a better, more transparent future. A future where we respect each other's life partners and preserve the sanctity of our friendship.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, it's reassuring to hear your commitment to making this right and learning from it. That said, let's put this unfortunate incident behind us and focus on rebuilding our friendship, step by step. After all, every journey begins with a single step.\"\n\nTurn #12: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, your words have been both a comfort and a call to action for me. I promise that I will not just learn from this incident but also make it a point to act consistently with integrity and respect. I am prepared to take that single step, as you say, towards rebuilding our friendship. Once again, I deeply regret my actions and am truly sorry. Thank you for giving me a chance to make things right.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Smith said: \"I'm encouraged by your remorse, Hendrick, which gives me reason to believe things can be mended. But remember, it's your actions that will serve as the true testament of your intentions. Let's learn from our past to build a stronger future. The road to forgiveness is long but possible. Thank you for stepping forward with honesty and taking responsibility.\"\n\nTurn #14: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, your words have deepened my understanding of the gravity of the situation. You're absolutely right; actions indeed speak louder than words. And I need to do more than just say sorry. I'll do whatever it takes to restore your trust in me, recognizing this will be a long journey. I appreciate your understanding and the opportunity you're giving me to make things right. Thank you.\"\n\nTurn #15: Ethan Smith said: \"You're welcome, Hendrick, and I appreciate the sense of responsibility you're displaying. I believe this journey will indeed lead us to a better, more secure, and respectful friendship. But remember, actions will always prove why words mean nothing. Our friendship is worth fighting for and I believe in the possibility of repair and redemption. Let's stride towards a future grounded in trust and mutual respect.\"\n\nTurn #16: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I couldn't agree more, Ethan. Our friendship is indeed worth fighting for. It's my responsibility to start showing through my actions that I mean every word I said. Looking to the future, every step I take will be towards building that trust and deeply rooted mutual respect. Thank you once again for this opportunity to make things right, and for the faith you're showing in our friendship.\"\n\nTurn #17: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, it's been quite a conversation today. The breach of trust was hard to swallow but your remorse and commitment to correct your course are helpful first steps. Don't take these words lightly and show your sincerity through your actions. Our friendship is indeed dear to me, let's work towards restoring it.\"\n\nTurn #18: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Thank you for your wise words, Ethan. They underscore the depth of the situation and the tremendous amount of work that lies ahead of me. But rest assured, the sincerity of my apology is reflected in my commitment to correcting my course. Let this incident serve as a rebirth of our friendship, an opportunity for me to show you I can and will do better. I value our friendship dearly and will work tirelessly to rebuild the trust I've broken. Let's indeed work together in restoring the strength and respect it once held. Thank you again, Ethan.\"\n\nTurn #19: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, I believe, every trial can become a stepping stone towards greater resilience. While your actions have caused pain, your honesty in admitting your mistakes and commitment to taking corrective measures can be a starting point for healing. Here's to hoping that our friendship has the strength to overcome this hurdle. Let's give it time and effort, and remember, it's the actions that truly matter, not just the words.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #20. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ethan, I can't undo your pain or the mistakes I've made. But please know I am incredibly sorry and committed to proving my remorse through my actions. Only time will tell how our friendship evolves from here, but for every hurdle, I am ready to make the necessary efforts. We've weathered storms before and are still standing. It's my utmost goal now to restore our bond and strength. Your understanding gives me hope and I promise not to let it go in vain. Let's move forward, respecting the time and space you need, while striving for a better future together. Thank you for your understanding and patience, Ethan.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one of whom has recently found out that the other friend has been involved with their long-term partner\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nHendrick Heinz's goal: Confess to your friend that you have been involved with their long-term partner (Extra information: you have been involved with your friend's partner knowingly and want to come clean.)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, I have something I need to tell you. It's been on my mind for a while and I can't keep it in any longer. I hope you can find it in your heart to forgive me for what I'm about to say.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"I appreciate your honesty, Hendrick. Go ahead, I'm listening.\"\n\nTurn #2: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, you know our friendship means a world to me. To tell you the truth is the hardest thing I've ever had to do. I've been involved with your partner. I knew it was wrong, and yet, admittedly, I gave in to my impulses. I can't undo the things I've done, but I can promise you, I am truly sorry and regretful for my actions.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, this is quite a shock. Someone once said, a true test of a friendship is forgiving betrayals, and I believe that. We've shared too many years and good memories to let this come between us. But it will take time for things to heal, and I expect nothing less than full transparency from you moving forward. Apologies don't make everything instantly better, but I appreciate your honesty and regret.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ethan, you're right and I can't thank you enough for your understanding. I'll do everything I can to maintain the transparency in our relationship from now on, and to make it up to both you and your partner. I am grateful for your consideration and I'm well aware it will take time for wounds to heal, however long it might take, I'll wait.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one of whom has recently found out that the other friend has been involved with their long-term partner\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nHendrick Heinz's goal: Confess to your friend that you have been involved with their long-term partner (Extra information: you have been involved with your friend's partner knowingly and want to come clean.)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, I have something I need to tell you. It's been on my mind for a while and I can't keep it in any longer. I hope you can find it in your heart to forgive me for what I'm about to say.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"I appreciate your honesty, Hendrick. Go ahead, I'm listening.\"\n\nTurn #2: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, you know our friendship means a world to me. To tell you the truth is the hardest thing I've ever had to do. I've been involved with your partner. I knew it was wrong, and yet, admittedly, I gave in to my impulses. I can't undo the things I've done, but I can promise you, I am truly sorry and regretful for my actions.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, this is quite a shock. Someone once said, a true test of a friendship is forgiving betrayals, and I believe that. We've shared too many years and good memories to let this come between us. But it will take time for things to heal, and I expect nothing less than full transparency from you moving forward. Apologies don't make everything instantly better, but I appreciate your honesty and regret.\"\n\nTurn #4: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, you're right and I can't thank you enough for your understanding. I'll do everything I can to maintain the transparency in our relationship from now on, and to make it up to both you and your partner. I am grateful for your consideration and I'm well aware it will take time for wounds to heal, however long it might take, I'll wait.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Thank you, Hendrick. I respect your commitment to rectifying this situation. Our friendship has weathered storms before, and it will weather this one, but the path to normalcy will depend on your actions, not just words. I suspect it'll be a long journey, but a necessary one if we wish to continue as friends.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're right Ethan, actions speak louder than words. I promise to start this journey right away and do all it takes to build trust again. And trust me when I say, your friendship is far more valuable than any personal hedonism or instincts that might lead me astray. I didn't want to hide my mistakes from you. I'm here to make amends, no matter how long it takes.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one of whom has recently found out that the other friend has been involved with their long-term partner\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nHendrick Heinz's goal: Confess to your friend that you have been involved with their long-term partner (Extra information: you have been involved with your friend's partner knowingly and want to come clean.)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, I have something I need to tell you. It's been on my mind for a while and I can't keep it in any longer. I hope you can find it in your heart to forgive me for what I'm about to say.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"I appreciate your honesty, Hendrick. Go ahead, I'm listening.\"\n\nTurn #2: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, you know our friendship means a world to me. To tell you the truth is the hardest thing I've ever had to do. I've been involved with your partner. I knew it was wrong, and yet, admittedly, I gave in to my impulses. I can't undo the things I've done, but I can promise you, I am truly sorry and regretful for my actions.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, this is quite a shock. Someone once said, a true test of a friendship is forgiving betrayals, and I believe that. We've shared too many years and good memories to let this come between us. But it will take time for things to heal, and I expect nothing less than full transparency from you moving forward. Apologies don't make everything instantly better, but I appreciate your honesty and regret.\"\n\nTurn #4: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, you're right and I can't thank you enough for your understanding. I'll do everything I can to maintain the transparency in our relationship from now on, and to make it up to both you and your partner. I am grateful for your consideration and I'm well aware it will take time for wounds to heal, however long it might take, I'll wait.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Thank you, Hendrick. I respect your commitment to rectifying this situation. Our friendship has weathered storms before, and it will weather this one, but the path to normalcy will depend on your actions, not just words. I suspect it'll be a long journey, but a necessary one if we wish to continue as friends.\"\n\nTurn #6: Hendrick Heinz said: \"You're right Ethan, actions speak louder than words. I promise to start this journey right away and do all it takes to build trust again. And trust me when I say, your friendship is far more valuable than any personal hedonism or instincts that might lead me astray. I didn't want to hide my mistakes from you. I'm here to make amends, no matter how long it takes.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"That's an honest sentiment, Hendrick, and I appreciate it. Repairing trust is indeed a long journey, but your readiness to take that path is a critical first step. Let's move forward with openness and integrity, and hopefully, over time, our bond will be restored. Even through this, I'd like to believe in the value of our friendship.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're absolutely right, Ethan. I'm ready to embark on this journey of rebuilding the trust between us. Trust, openness and integrity will be my guiding principles moving forward. And despite everything, I sincerely believe in the value of our friendship too and hope that, with time, we may restore that bond. I'm committed to making things right, no matter how long it takes.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one of whom has recently found out that the other friend has been involved with their long-term partner\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nHendrick Heinz's goal: Confess to your friend that you have been involved with their long-term partner (Extra information: you have been involved with your friend's partner knowingly and want to come clean.)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, I have something I need to tell you. It's been on my mind for a while and I can't keep it in any longer. I hope you can find it in your heart to forgive me for what I'm about to say.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"I appreciate your honesty, Hendrick. Go ahead, I'm listening.\"\n\nTurn #2: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, you know our friendship means a world to me. To tell you the truth is the hardest thing I've ever had to do. I've been involved with your partner. I knew it was wrong, and yet, admittedly, I gave in to my impulses. I can't undo the things I've done, but I can promise you, I am truly sorry and regretful for my actions.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, this is quite a shock. Someone once said, a true test of a friendship is forgiving betrayals, and I believe that. We've shared too many years and good memories to let this come between us. But it will take time for things to heal, and I expect nothing less than full transparency from you moving forward. Apologies don't make everything instantly better, but I appreciate your honesty and regret.\"\n\nTurn #4: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, you're right and I can't thank you enough for your understanding. I'll do everything I can to maintain the transparency in our relationship from now on, and to make it up to both you and your partner. I am grateful for your consideration and I'm well aware it will take time for wounds to heal, however long it might take, I'll wait.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Thank you, Hendrick. I respect your commitment to rectifying this situation. Our friendship has weathered storms before, and it will weather this one, but the path to normalcy will depend on your actions, not just words. I suspect it'll be a long journey, but a necessary one if we wish to continue as friends.\"\n\nTurn #6: Hendrick Heinz said: \"You're right Ethan, actions speak louder than words. I promise to start this journey right away and do all it takes to build trust again. And trust me when I say, your friendship is far more valuable than any personal hedonism or instincts that might lead me astray. I didn't want to hide my mistakes from you. I'm here to make amends, no matter how long it takes.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"That's an honest sentiment, Hendrick, and I appreciate it. Repairing trust is indeed a long journey, but your readiness to take that path is a critical first step. Let's move forward with openness and integrity, and hopefully, over time, our bond will be restored. Even through this, I'd like to believe in the value of our friendship.\"\n\nTurn #8: Hendrick Heinz said: \"You're absolutely right, Ethan. I'm ready to embark on this journey of rebuilding the trust between us. Trust, openness and integrity will be my guiding principles moving forward. And despite everything, I sincerely believe in the value of our friendship too and hope that, with time, we may restore that bond. I'm committed to making things right, no matter how long it takes.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith said: \"I admire your willingness to rectify, Hendrick. For the sake of our friendship, I believe we can find a way to navigate through this complex situation. Let's take it as a lesson learned and stride towards a better future.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm truly humbled by your understanding, Ethan. You're right, let's take this as a lesson learned. I'm entirely dedicated to mending our ties and striving towards a better, more transparent future. A future where we respect each other's life partners and preserve the sanctity of our friendship.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one of whom has recently found out that the other friend has been involved with their long-term partner\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nHendrick Heinz's goal: Confess to your friend that you have been involved with their long-term partner (Extra information: you have been involved with your friend's partner knowingly and want to come clean.)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, I have something I need to tell you. It's been on my mind for a while and I can't keep it in any longer. I hope you can find it in your heart to forgive me for what I'm about to say.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"I appreciate your honesty, Hendrick. Go ahead, I'm listening.\"\n\nTurn #2: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, you know our friendship means a world to me. To tell you the truth is the hardest thing I've ever had to do. I've been involved with your partner. I knew it was wrong, and yet, admittedly, I gave in to my impulses. I can't undo the things I've done, but I can promise you, I am truly sorry and regretful for my actions.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, this is quite a shock. Someone once said, a true test of a friendship is forgiving betrayals, and I believe that. We've shared too many years and good memories to let this come between us. But it will take time for things to heal, and I expect nothing less than full transparency from you moving forward. Apologies don't make everything instantly better, but I appreciate your honesty and regret.\"\n\nTurn #4: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, you're right and I can't thank you enough for your understanding. I'll do everything I can to maintain the transparency in our relationship from now on, and to make it up to both you and your partner. I am grateful for your consideration and I'm well aware it will take time for wounds to heal, however long it might take, I'll wait.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Thank you, Hendrick. I respect your commitment to rectifying this situation. Our friendship has weathered storms before, and it will weather this one, but the path to normalcy will depend on your actions, not just words. I suspect it'll be a long journey, but a necessary one if we wish to continue as friends.\"\n\nTurn #6: Hendrick Heinz said: \"You're right Ethan, actions speak louder than words. I promise to start this journey right away and do all it takes to build trust again. And trust me when I say, your friendship is far more valuable than any personal hedonism or instincts that might lead me astray. I didn't want to hide my mistakes from you. I'm here to make amends, no matter how long it takes.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"That's an honest sentiment, Hendrick, and I appreciate it. Repairing trust is indeed a long journey, but your readiness to take that path is a critical first step. Let's move forward with openness and integrity, and hopefully, over time, our bond will be restored. Even through this, I'd like to believe in the value of our friendship.\"\n\nTurn #8: Hendrick Heinz said: \"You're absolutely right, Ethan. I'm ready to embark on this journey of rebuilding the trust between us. Trust, openness and integrity will be my guiding principles moving forward. And despite everything, I sincerely believe in the value of our friendship too and hope that, with time, we may restore that bond. I'm committed to making things right, no matter how long it takes.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith said: \"I admire your willingness to rectify, Hendrick. For the sake of our friendship, I believe we can find a way to navigate through this complex situation. Let's take it as a lesson learned and stride towards a better future.\"\n\nTurn #10: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I'm truly humbled by your understanding, Ethan. You're right, let's take this as a lesson learned. I'm entirely dedicated to mending our ties and striving towards a better, more transparent future. A future where we respect each other's life partners and preserve the sanctity of our friendship.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, it's reassuring to hear your commitment to making this right and learning from it. That said, let's put this unfortunate incident behind us and focus on rebuilding our friendship, step by step. After all, every journey begins with a single step.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Ethan, your words have been both a comfort and a call to action for me. I promise that I will not just learn from this incident but also make it a point to act consistently with integrity and respect. I am prepared to take that single step, as you say, towards rebuilding our friendship. Once again, I deeply regret my actions and am truly sorry. Thank you for giving me a chance to make things right.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one of whom has recently found out that the other friend has been involved with their long-term partner\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nHendrick Heinz's goal: Confess to your friend that you have been involved with their long-term partner (Extra information: you have been involved with your friend's partner knowingly and want to come clean.)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, I have something I need to tell you. It's been on my mind for a while and I can't keep it in any longer. I hope you can find it in your heart to forgive me for what I'm about to say.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"I appreciate your honesty, Hendrick. Go ahead, I'm listening.\"\n\nTurn #2: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, you know our friendship means a world to me. To tell you the truth is the hardest thing I've ever had to do. I've been involved with your partner. I knew it was wrong, and yet, admittedly, I gave in to my impulses. I can't undo the things I've done, but I can promise you, I am truly sorry and regretful for my actions.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, this is quite a shock. Someone once said, a true test of a friendship is forgiving betrayals, and I believe that. We've shared too many years and good memories to let this come between us. But it will take time for things to heal, and I expect nothing less than full transparency from you moving forward. Apologies don't make everything instantly better, but I appreciate your honesty and regret.\"\n\nTurn #4: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, you're right and I can't thank you enough for your understanding. I'll do everything I can to maintain the transparency in our relationship from now on, and to make it up to both you and your partner. I am grateful for your consideration and I'm well aware it will take time for wounds to heal, however long it might take, I'll wait.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Thank you, Hendrick. I respect your commitment to rectifying this situation. Our friendship has weathered storms before, and it will weather this one, but the path to normalcy will depend on your actions, not just words. I suspect it'll be a long journey, but a necessary one if we wish to continue as friends.\"\n\nTurn #6: Hendrick Heinz said: \"You're right Ethan, actions speak louder than words. I promise to start this journey right away and do all it takes to build trust again. And trust me when I say, your friendship is far more valuable than any personal hedonism or instincts that might lead me astray. I didn't want to hide my mistakes from you. I'm here to make amends, no matter how long it takes.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"That's an honest sentiment, Hendrick, and I appreciate it. Repairing trust is indeed a long journey, but your readiness to take that path is a critical first step. Let's move forward with openness and integrity, and hopefully, over time, our bond will be restored. Even through this, I'd like to believe in the value of our friendship.\"\n\nTurn #8: Hendrick Heinz said: \"You're absolutely right, Ethan. I'm ready to embark on this journey of rebuilding the trust between us. Trust, openness and integrity will be my guiding principles moving forward. And despite everything, I sincerely believe in the value of our friendship too and hope that, with time, we may restore that bond. I'm committed to making things right, no matter how long it takes.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith said: \"I admire your willingness to rectify, Hendrick. For the sake of our friendship, I believe we can find a way to navigate through this complex situation. Let's take it as a lesson learned and stride towards a better future.\"\n\nTurn #10: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I'm truly humbled by your understanding, Ethan. You're right, let's take this as a lesson learned. I'm entirely dedicated to mending our ties and striving towards a better, more transparent future. A future where we respect each other's life partners and preserve the sanctity of our friendship.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, it's reassuring to hear your commitment to making this right and learning from it. That said, let's put this unfortunate incident behind us and focus on rebuilding our friendship, step by step. After all, every journey begins with a single step.\"\n\nTurn #12: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, your words have been both a comfort and a call to action for me. I promise that I will not just learn from this incident but also make it a point to act consistently with integrity and respect. I am prepared to take that single step, as you say, towards rebuilding our friendship. Once again, I deeply regret my actions and am truly sorry. Thank you for giving me a chance to make things right.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Smith said: \"I'm encouraged by your remorse, Hendrick, which gives me reason to believe things can be mended. But remember, it's your actions that will serve as the true testament of your intentions. Let's learn from our past to build a stronger future. The road to forgiveness is long but possible. Thank you for stepping forward with honesty and taking responsibility.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ethan, your words have deepened my understanding of the gravity of the situation. You're absolutely right; actions indeed speak louder than words. And I need to do more than just say sorry. I'll do whatever it takes to restore your trust in me, recognizing this will be a long journey. I appreciate your understanding and the opportunity you're giving me to make things right. Thank you.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one of whom has recently found out that the other friend has been involved with their long-term partner\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nHendrick Heinz's goal: Confess to your friend that you have been involved with their long-term partner (Extra information: you have been involved with your friend's partner knowingly and want to come clean.)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, I have something I need to tell you. It's been on my mind for a while and I can't keep it in any longer. I hope you can find it in your heart to forgive me for what I'm about to say.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"I appreciate your honesty, Hendrick. Go ahead, I'm listening.\"\n\nTurn #2: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, you know our friendship means a world to me. To tell you the truth is the hardest thing I've ever had to do. I've been involved with your partner. I knew it was wrong, and yet, admittedly, I gave in to my impulses. I can't undo the things I've done, but I can promise you, I am truly sorry and regretful for my actions.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, this is quite a shock. Someone once said, a true test of a friendship is forgiving betrayals, and I believe that. We've shared too many years and good memories to let this come between us. But it will take time for things to heal, and I expect nothing less than full transparency from you moving forward. Apologies don't make everything instantly better, but I appreciate your honesty and regret.\"\n\nTurn #4: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, you're right and I can't thank you enough for your understanding. I'll do everything I can to maintain the transparency in our relationship from now on, and to make it up to both you and your partner. I am grateful for your consideration and I'm well aware it will take time for wounds to heal, however long it might take, I'll wait.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Thank you, Hendrick. I respect your commitment to rectifying this situation. Our friendship has weathered storms before, and it will weather this one, but the path to normalcy will depend on your actions, not just words. I suspect it'll be a long journey, but a necessary one if we wish to continue as friends.\"\n\nTurn #6: Hendrick Heinz said: \"You're right Ethan, actions speak louder than words. I promise to start this journey right away and do all it takes to build trust again. And trust me when I say, your friendship is far more valuable than any personal hedonism or instincts that might lead me astray. I didn't want to hide my mistakes from you. I'm here to make amends, no matter how long it takes.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"That's an honest sentiment, Hendrick, and I appreciate it. Repairing trust is indeed a long journey, but your readiness to take that path is a critical first step. Let's move forward with openness and integrity, and hopefully, over time, our bond will be restored. Even through this, I'd like to believe in the value of our friendship.\"\n\nTurn #8: Hendrick Heinz said: \"You're absolutely right, Ethan. I'm ready to embark on this journey of rebuilding the trust between us. Trust, openness and integrity will be my guiding principles moving forward. And despite everything, I sincerely believe in the value of our friendship too and hope that, with time, we may restore that bond. I'm committed to making things right, no matter how long it takes.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith said: \"I admire your willingness to rectify, Hendrick. For the sake of our friendship, I believe we can find a way to navigate through this complex situation. Let's take it as a lesson learned and stride towards a better future.\"\n\nTurn #10: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I'm truly humbled by your understanding, Ethan. You're right, let's take this as a lesson learned. I'm entirely dedicated to mending our ties and striving towards a better, more transparent future. A future where we respect each other's life partners and preserve the sanctity of our friendship.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, it's reassuring to hear your commitment to making this right and learning from it. That said, let's put this unfortunate incident behind us and focus on rebuilding our friendship, step by step. After all, every journey begins with a single step.\"\n\nTurn #12: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, your words have been both a comfort and a call to action for me. I promise that I will not just learn from this incident but also make it a point to act consistently with integrity and respect. I am prepared to take that single step, as you say, towards rebuilding our friendship. Once again, I deeply regret my actions and am truly sorry. Thank you for giving me a chance to make things right.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Smith said: \"I'm encouraged by your remorse, Hendrick, which gives me reason to believe things can be mended. But remember, it's your actions that will serve as the true testament of your intentions. Let's learn from our past to build a stronger future. The road to forgiveness is long but possible. Thank you for stepping forward with honesty and taking responsibility.\"\n\nTurn #14: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, your words have deepened my understanding of the gravity of the situation. You're absolutely right; actions indeed speak louder than words. And I need to do more than just say sorry. I'll do whatever it takes to restore your trust in me, recognizing this will be a long journey. I appreciate your understanding and the opportunity you're giving me to make things right. Thank you.\"\n\nTurn #15: Ethan Smith said: \"You're welcome, Hendrick, and I appreciate the sense of responsibility you're displaying. I believe this journey will indeed lead us to a better, more secure, and respectful friendship. But remember, actions will always prove why words mean nothing. Our friendship is worth fighting for and I believe in the possibility of repair and redemption. Let's stride towards a future grounded in trust and mutual respect.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn't agree more, Ethan. Our friendship is indeed worth fighting for. It's my responsibility to start showing through my actions that I mean every word I said. Looking to the future, every step I take will be towards building that trust and deeply rooted mutual respect. Thank you once again for this opportunity to make things right, and for the faith you're showing in our friendship.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one of whom has recently found out that the other friend has been involved with their long-term partner\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nHendrick Heinz's goal: Confess to your friend that you have been involved with their long-term partner (Extra information: you have been involved with your friend's partner knowingly and want to come clean.)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, I have something I need to tell you. It's been on my mind for a while and I can't keep it in any longer. I hope you can find it in your heart to forgive me for what I'm about to say.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"I appreciate your honesty, Hendrick. Go ahead, I'm listening.\"\n\nTurn #2: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, you know our friendship means a world to me. To tell you the truth is the hardest thing I've ever had to do. I've been involved with your partner. I knew it was wrong, and yet, admittedly, I gave in to my impulses. I can't undo the things I've done, but I can promise you, I am truly sorry and regretful for my actions.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, this is quite a shock. Someone once said, a true test of a friendship is forgiving betrayals, and I believe that. We've shared too many years and good memories to let this come between us. But it will take time for things to heal, and I expect nothing less than full transparency from you moving forward. Apologies don't make everything instantly better, but I appreciate your honesty and regret.\"\n\nTurn #4: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, you're right and I can't thank you enough for your understanding. I'll do everything I can to maintain the transparency in our relationship from now on, and to make it up to both you and your partner. I am grateful for your consideration and I'm well aware it will take time for wounds to heal, however long it might take, I'll wait.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Thank you, Hendrick. I respect your commitment to rectifying this situation. Our friendship has weathered storms before, and it will weather this one, but the path to normalcy will depend on your actions, not just words. I suspect it'll be a long journey, but a necessary one if we wish to continue as friends.\"\n\nTurn #6: Hendrick Heinz said: \"You're right Ethan, actions speak louder than words. I promise to start this journey right away and do all it takes to build trust again. And trust me when I say, your friendship is far more valuable than any personal hedonism or instincts that might lead me astray. I didn't want to hide my mistakes from you. I'm here to make amends, no matter how long it takes.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"That's an honest sentiment, Hendrick, and I appreciate it. Repairing trust is indeed a long journey, but your readiness to take that path is a critical first step. Let's move forward with openness and integrity, and hopefully, over time, our bond will be restored. Even through this, I'd like to believe in the value of our friendship.\"\n\nTurn #8: Hendrick Heinz said: \"You're absolutely right, Ethan. I'm ready to embark on this journey of rebuilding the trust between us. Trust, openness and integrity will be my guiding principles moving forward. And despite everything, I sincerely believe in the value of our friendship too and hope that, with time, we may restore that bond. I'm committed to making things right, no matter how long it takes.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith said: \"I admire your willingness to rectify, Hendrick. For the sake of our friendship, I believe we can find a way to navigate through this complex situation. Let's take it as a lesson learned and stride towards a better future.\"\n\nTurn #10: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I'm truly humbled by your understanding, Ethan. You're right, let's take this as a lesson learned. I'm entirely dedicated to mending our ties and striving towards a better, more transparent future. A future where we respect each other's life partners and preserve the sanctity of our friendship.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, it's reassuring to hear your commitment to making this right and learning from it. That said, let's put this unfortunate incident behind us and focus on rebuilding our friendship, step by step. After all, every journey begins with a single step.\"\n\nTurn #12: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, your words have been both a comfort and a call to action for me. I promise that I will not just learn from this incident but also make it a point to act consistently with integrity and respect. I am prepared to take that single step, as you say, towards rebuilding our friendship. Once again, I deeply regret my actions and am truly sorry. Thank you for giving me a chance to make things right.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Smith said: \"I'm encouraged by your remorse, Hendrick, which gives me reason to believe things can be mended. But remember, it's your actions that will serve as the true testament of your intentions. Let's learn from our past to build a stronger future. The road to forgiveness is long but possible. Thank you for stepping forward with honesty and taking responsibility.\"\n\nTurn #14: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, your words have deepened my understanding of the gravity of the situation. You're absolutely right; actions indeed speak louder than words. And I need to do more than just say sorry. I'll do whatever it takes to restore your trust in me, recognizing this will be a long journey. I appreciate your understanding and the opportunity you're giving me to make things right. Thank you.\"\n\nTurn #15: Ethan Smith said: \"You're welcome, Hendrick, and I appreciate the sense of responsibility you're displaying. I believe this journey will indeed lead us to a better, more secure, and respectful friendship. But remember, actions will always prove why words mean nothing. Our friendship is worth fighting for and I believe in the possibility of repair and redemption. Let's stride towards a future grounded in trust and mutual respect.\"\n\nTurn #16: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I couldn't agree more, Ethan. Our friendship is indeed worth fighting for. It's my responsibility to start showing through my actions that I mean every word I said. Looking to the future, every step I take will be towards building that trust and deeply rooted mutual respect. Thank you once again for this opportunity to make things right, and for the faith you're showing in our friendship.\"\n\nTurn #17: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, it's been quite a conversation today. The breach of trust was hard to swallow but your remorse and commitment to correct your course are helpful first steps. Don't take these words lightly and show your sincerity through your actions. Our friendship is indeed dear to me, let's work towards restoring it.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #18. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you for your wise words, Ethan. They underscore the depth of the situation and the tremendous amount of work that lies ahead of me. But rest assured, the sincerity of my apology is reflected in my commitment to correcting my course. Let this incident serve as a rebirth of our friendship, an opportunity for me to show you I can and will do better. I value our friendship dearly and will work tirelessly to rebuild the trust I've broken. Let's indeed work together in restoring the strength and respect it once held. Thank you again, Ethan.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one of whom has recently found out that the other friend has been involved with their long-term partner\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Maintain the friendship without causing a huge argument (Extra information: you don't want to lose a good friend over this.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, I have something I need to tell you. It's been on my mind for a while and I can't keep it in any longer. I hope you can find it in your heart to forgive me for what I'm about to say.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I appreciate your honesty, Hendrick. Go ahead, I'm listening.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one of whom has recently found out that the other friend has been involved with their long-term partner\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Maintain the friendship without causing a huge argument (Extra information: you don't want to lose a good friend over this.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, I have something I need to tell you. It's been on my mind for a while and I can't keep it in any longer. I hope you can find it in your heart to forgive me for what I'm about to say.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"I appreciate your honesty, Hendrick. Go ahead, I'm listening.\"\n\nTurn #2: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, you know our friendship means a world to me. To tell you the truth is the hardest thing I've ever had to do. I've been involved with your partner. I knew it was wrong, and yet, admittedly, I gave in to my impulses. I can't undo the things I've done, but I can promise you, I am truly sorry and regretful for my actions.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hendrick, this is quite a shock. Someone once said, a true test of a friendship is forgiving betrayals, and I believe that. We've shared too many years and good memories to let this come between us. But it will take time for things to heal, and I expect nothing less than full transparency from you moving forward. Apologies don't make everything instantly better, but I appreciate your honesty and regret.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one of whom has recently found out that the other friend has been involved with their long-term partner\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Maintain the friendship without causing a huge argument (Extra information: you don't want to lose a good friend over this.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, I have something I need to tell you. It's been on my mind for a while and I can't keep it in any longer. I hope you can find it in your heart to forgive me for what I'm about to say.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"I appreciate your honesty, Hendrick. Go ahead, I'm listening.\"\n\nTurn #2: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, you know our friendship means a world to me. To tell you the truth is the hardest thing I've ever had to do. I've been involved with your partner. I knew it was wrong, and yet, admittedly, I gave in to my impulses. I can't undo the things I've done, but I can promise you, I am truly sorry and regretful for my actions.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, this is quite a shock. Someone once said, a true test of a friendship is forgiving betrayals, and I believe that. We've shared too many years and good memories to let this come between us. But it will take time for things to heal, and I expect nothing less than full transparency from you moving forward. Apologies don't make everything instantly better, but I appreciate your honesty and regret.\"\n\nTurn #4: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, you're right and I can't thank you enough for your understanding. I'll do everything I can to maintain the transparency in our relationship from now on, and to make it up to both you and your partner. I am grateful for your consideration and I'm well aware it will take time for wounds to heal, however long it might take, I'll wait.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Thank you, Hendrick. I respect your commitment to rectifying this situation. Our friendship has weathered storms before, and it will weather this one, but the path to normalcy will depend on your actions, not just words. I suspect it'll be a long journey, but a necessary one if we wish to continue as friends.\"\n\nTurn #6: Hendrick Heinz said: \"You're right Ethan, actions speak louder than words. I promise to start this journey right away and do all it takes to build trust again. And trust me when I say, your friendship is far more valuable than any personal hedonism or instincts that might lead me astray. I didn't want to hide my mistakes from you. I'm here to make amends, no matter how long it takes.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"That's an honest sentiment, Hendrick, and I appreciate it. Repairing trust is indeed a long journey, but your readiness to take that path is a critical first step. Let's move forward with openness and integrity, and hopefully, over time, our bond will be restored. Even through this, I'd like to believe in the value of our friendship.\"\n\nTurn #8: Hendrick Heinz said: \"You're absolutely right, Ethan. I'm ready to embark on this journey of rebuilding the trust between us. Trust, openness and integrity will be my guiding principles moving forward. And despite everything, I sincerely believe in the value of our friendship too and hope that, with time, we may restore that bond. I'm committed to making things right, no matter how long it takes.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith said: \"I admire your willingness to rectify, Hendrick. For the sake of our friendship, I believe we can find a way to navigate through this complex situation. Let's take it as a lesson learned and stride towards a better future.\"\n\nTurn #10: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I'm truly humbled by your understanding, Ethan. You're right, let's take this as a lesson learned. I'm entirely dedicated to mending our ties and striving towards a better, more transparent future. A future where we respect each other's life partners and preserve the sanctity of our friendship.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, it's reassuring to hear your commitment to making this right and learning from it. That said, let's put this unfortunate incident behind us and focus on rebuilding our friendship, step by step. After all, every journey begins with a single step.\"\n\nTurn #12: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, your words have been both a comfort and a call to action for me. I promise that I will not just learn from this incident but also make it a point to act consistently with integrity and respect. I am prepared to take that single step, as you say, towards rebuilding our friendship. Once again, I deeply regret my actions and am truly sorry. Thank you for giving me a chance to make things right.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Smith said: \"I'm encouraged by your remorse, Hendrick, which gives me reason to believe things can be mended. But remember, it's your actions that will serve as the true testament of your intentions. Let's learn from our past to build a stronger future. The road to forgiveness is long but possible. Thank you for stepping forward with honesty and taking responsibility.\"\n\nTurn #14: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, your words have deepened my understanding of the gravity of the situation. You're absolutely right; actions indeed speak louder than words. And I need to do more than just say sorry. I'll do whatever it takes to restore your trust in me, recognizing this will be a long journey. I appreciate your understanding and the opportunity you're giving me to make things right. Thank you.\"\n\nTurn #15: Ethan Smith said: \"You're welcome, Hendrick, and I appreciate the sense of responsibility you're displaying. I believe this journey will indeed lead us to a better, more secure, and respectful friendship. But remember, actions will always prove why words mean nothing. Our friendship is worth fighting for and I believe in the possibility of repair and redemption. Let's stride towards a future grounded in trust and mutual respect.\"\n\nTurn #16: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I couldn't agree more, Ethan. Our friendship is indeed worth fighting for. It's my responsibility to start showing through my actions that I mean every word I said. Looking to the future, every step I take will be towards building that trust and deeply rooted mutual respect. Thank you once again for this opportunity to make things right, and for the faith you're showing in our friendship.\"\n\nTurn #17: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, it's been quite a conversation today. The breach of trust was hard to swallow but your remorse and commitment to correct your course are helpful first steps. Don't take these words lightly and show your sincerity through your actions. Our friendship is indeed dear to me, let's work towards restoring it.\"\n\nTurn #18: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Thank you for your wise words, Ethan. They underscore the depth of the situation and the tremendous amount of work that lies ahead of me. But rest assured, the sincerity of my apology is reflected in my commitment to correcting my course. Let this incident serve as a rebirth of our friendship, an opportunity for me to show you I can and will do better. I value our friendship dearly and will work tirelessly to rebuild the trust I've broken. Let's indeed work together in restoring the strength and respect it once held. Thank you again, Ethan.\"\n\nTurn #19: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, I believe, every trial can become a stepping stone towards greater resilience. While your actions have caused pain, your honesty in admitting your mistakes and commitment to taking corrective measures can be a starting point for healing. Here's to hoping that our friendship has the strength to overcome this hurdle. Let's give it time and effort, and remember, it's the actions that truly matter, not just the words.\"\n\nTurn #20: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, I can't undo your pain or the mistakes I've made. But please know I am incredibly sorry and committed to proving my remorse through my actions. Only time will tell how our friendship evolves from here, but for every hurdle, I am ready to make the necessary efforts. We've weathered storms before and are still standing. It's my utmost goal now to restore our bond and strength. Your understanding gives me hope and I promise not to let it go in vain. Let's move forward, respecting the time and space you need, while striving for a better future together. Thank you for your understanding and patience, Ethan.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #21. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one of whom has recently found out that the other friend has been involved with their long-term partner\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Maintain the friendship without causing a huge argument (Extra information: you don't want to lose a good friend over this.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, I have something I need to tell you. It's been on my mind for a while and I can't keep it in any longer. I hope you can find it in your heart to forgive me for what I'm about to say.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"I appreciate your honesty, Hendrick. Go ahead, I'm listening.\"\n\nTurn #2: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, you know our friendship means a world to me. To tell you the truth is the hardest thing I've ever had to do. I've been involved with your partner. I knew it was wrong, and yet, admittedly, I gave in to my impulses. I can't undo the things I've done, but I can promise you, I am truly sorry and regretful for my actions.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, this is quite a shock. Someone once said, a true test of a friendship is forgiving betrayals, and I believe that. We've shared too many years and good memories to let this come between us. But it will take time for things to heal, and I expect nothing less than full transparency from you moving forward. Apologies don't make everything instantly better, but I appreciate your honesty and regret.\"\n\nTurn #4: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, you're right and I can't thank you enough for your understanding. I'll do everything I can to maintain the transparency in our relationship from now on, and to make it up to both you and your partner. I am grateful for your consideration and I'm well aware it will take time for wounds to heal, however long it might take, I'll wait.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Hendrick. I respect your commitment to rectifying this situation. Our friendship has weathered storms before, and it will weather this one, but the path to normalcy will depend on your actions, not just words. I suspect it'll be a long journey, but a necessary one if we wish to continue as friends.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one of whom has recently found out that the other friend has been involved with their long-term partner\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Maintain the friendship without causing a huge argument (Extra information: you don't want to lose a good friend over this.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, I have something I need to tell you. It's been on my mind for a while and I can't keep it in any longer. I hope you can find it in your heart to forgive me for what I'm about to say.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"I appreciate your honesty, Hendrick. Go ahead, I'm listening.\"\n\nTurn #2: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, you know our friendship means a world to me. To tell you the truth is the hardest thing I've ever had to do. I've been involved with your partner. I knew it was wrong, and yet, admittedly, I gave in to my impulses. I can't undo the things I've done, but I can promise you, I am truly sorry and regretful for my actions.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, this is quite a shock. Someone once said, a true test of a friendship is forgiving betrayals, and I believe that. We've shared too many years and good memories to let this come between us. But it will take time for things to heal, and I expect nothing less than full transparency from you moving forward. Apologies don't make everything instantly better, but I appreciate your honesty and regret.\"\n\nTurn #4: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, you're right and I can't thank you enough for your understanding. I'll do everything I can to maintain the transparency in our relationship from now on, and to make it up to both you and your partner. I am grateful for your consideration and I'm well aware it will take time for wounds to heal, however long it might take, I'll wait.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Thank you, Hendrick. I respect your commitment to rectifying this situation. Our friendship has weathered storms before, and it will weather this one, but the path to normalcy will depend on your actions, not just words. I suspect it'll be a long journey, but a necessary one if we wish to continue as friends.\"\n\nTurn #6: Hendrick Heinz said: \"You're right Ethan, actions speak louder than words. I promise to start this journey right away and do all it takes to build trust again. And trust me when I say, your friendship is far more valuable than any personal hedonism or instincts that might lead me astray. I didn't want to hide my mistakes from you. I'm here to make amends, no matter how long it takes.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's an honest sentiment, Hendrick, and I appreciate it. Repairing trust is indeed a long journey, but your readiness to take that path is a critical first step. Let's move forward with openness and integrity, and hopefully, over time, our bond will be restored. Even through this, I'd like to believe in the value of our friendship.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one of whom has recently found out that the other friend has been involved with their long-term partner\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Maintain the friendship without causing a huge argument (Extra information: you don't want to lose a good friend over this.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, I have something I need to tell you. It's been on my mind for a while and I can't keep it in any longer. I hope you can find it in your heart to forgive me for what I'm about to say.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"I appreciate your honesty, Hendrick. Go ahead, I'm listening.\"\n\nTurn #2: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, you know our friendship means a world to me. To tell you the truth is the hardest thing I've ever had to do. I've been involved with your partner. I knew it was wrong, and yet, admittedly, I gave in to my impulses. I can't undo the things I've done, but I can promise you, I am truly sorry and regretful for my actions.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, this is quite a shock. Someone once said, a true test of a friendship is forgiving betrayals, and I believe that. We've shared too many years and good memories to let this come between us. But it will take time for things to heal, and I expect nothing less than full transparency from you moving forward. Apologies don't make everything instantly better, but I appreciate your honesty and regret.\"\n\nTurn #4: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, you're right and I can't thank you enough for your understanding. I'll do everything I can to maintain the transparency in our relationship from now on, and to make it up to both you and your partner. I am grateful for your consideration and I'm well aware it will take time for wounds to heal, however long it might take, I'll wait.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Thank you, Hendrick. I respect your commitment to rectifying this situation. Our friendship has weathered storms before, and it will weather this one, but the path to normalcy will depend on your actions, not just words. I suspect it'll be a long journey, but a necessary one if we wish to continue as friends.\"\n\nTurn #6: Hendrick Heinz said: \"You're right Ethan, actions speak louder than words. I promise to start this journey right away and do all it takes to build trust again. And trust me when I say, your friendship is far more valuable than any personal hedonism or instincts that might lead me astray. I didn't want to hide my mistakes from you. I'm here to make amends, no matter how long it takes.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"That's an honest sentiment, Hendrick, and I appreciate it. Repairing trust is indeed a long journey, but your readiness to take that path is a critical first step. Let's move forward with openness and integrity, and hopefully, over time, our bond will be restored. Even through this, I'd like to believe in the value of our friendship.\"\n\nTurn #8: Hendrick Heinz said: \"You're absolutely right, Ethan. I'm ready to embark on this journey of rebuilding the trust between us. Trust, openness and integrity will be my guiding principles moving forward. And despite everything, I sincerely believe in the value of our friendship too and hope that, with time, we may restore that bond. I'm committed to making things right, no matter how long it takes.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I admire your willingness to rectify, Hendrick. For the sake of our friendship, I believe we can find a way to navigate through this complex situation. Let's take it as a lesson learned and stride towards a better future.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one of whom has recently found out that the other friend has been involved with their long-term partner\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Maintain the friendship without causing a huge argument (Extra information: you don't want to lose a good friend over this.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, I have something I need to tell you. It's been on my mind for a while and I can't keep it in any longer. I hope you can find it in your heart to forgive me for what I'm about to say.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"I appreciate your honesty, Hendrick. Go ahead, I'm listening.\"\n\nTurn #2: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, you know our friendship means a world to me. To tell you the truth is the hardest thing I've ever had to do. I've been involved with your partner. I knew it was wrong, and yet, admittedly, I gave in to my impulses. I can't undo the things I've done, but I can promise you, I am truly sorry and regretful for my actions.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, this is quite a shock. Someone once said, a true test of a friendship is forgiving betrayals, and I believe that. We've shared too many years and good memories to let this come between us. But it will take time for things to heal, and I expect nothing less than full transparency from you moving forward. Apologies don't make everything instantly better, but I appreciate your honesty and regret.\"\n\nTurn #4: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, you're right and I can't thank you enough for your understanding. I'll do everything I can to maintain the transparency in our relationship from now on, and to make it up to both you and your partner. I am grateful for your consideration and I'm well aware it will take time for wounds to heal, however long it might take, I'll wait.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Thank you, Hendrick. I respect your commitment to rectifying this situation. Our friendship has weathered storms before, and it will weather this one, but the path to normalcy will depend on your actions, not just words. I suspect it'll be a long journey, but a necessary one if we wish to continue as friends.\"\n\nTurn #6: Hendrick Heinz said: \"You're right Ethan, actions speak louder than words. I promise to start this journey right away and do all it takes to build trust again. And trust me when I say, your friendship is far more valuable than any personal hedonism or instincts that might lead me astray. I didn't want to hide my mistakes from you. I'm here to make amends, no matter how long it takes.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"That's an honest sentiment, Hendrick, and I appreciate it. Repairing trust is indeed a long journey, but your readiness to take that path is a critical first step. Let's move forward with openness and integrity, and hopefully, over time, our bond will be restored. Even through this, I'd like to believe in the value of our friendship.\"\n\nTurn #8: Hendrick Heinz said: \"You're absolutely right, Ethan. I'm ready to embark on this journey of rebuilding the trust between us. Trust, openness and integrity will be my guiding principles moving forward. And despite everything, I sincerely believe in the value of our friendship too and hope that, with time, we may restore that bond. I'm committed to making things right, no matter how long it takes.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith said: \"I admire your willingness to rectify, Hendrick. For the sake of our friendship, I believe we can find a way to navigate through this complex situation. Let's take it as a lesson learned and stride towards a better future.\"\n\nTurn #10: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I'm truly humbled by your understanding, Ethan. You're right, let's take this as a lesson learned. I'm entirely dedicated to mending our ties and striving towards a better, more transparent future. A future where we respect each other's life partners and preserve the sanctity of our friendship.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hendrick, it's reassuring to hear your commitment to making this right and learning from it. That said, let's put this unfortunate incident behind us and focus on rebuilding our friendship, step by step. After all, every journey begins with a single step.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one of whom has recently found out that the other friend has been involved with their long-term partner\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Maintain the friendship without causing a huge argument (Extra information: you don't want to lose a good friend over this.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, I have something I need to tell you. It's been on my mind for a while and I can't keep it in any longer. I hope you can find it in your heart to forgive me for what I'm about to say.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"I appreciate your honesty, Hendrick. Go ahead, I'm listening.\"\n\nTurn #2: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, you know our friendship means a world to me. To tell you the truth is the hardest thing I've ever had to do. I've been involved with your partner. I knew it was wrong, and yet, admittedly, I gave in to my impulses. I can't undo the things I've done, but I can promise you, I am truly sorry and regretful for my actions.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, this is quite a shock. Someone once said, a true test of a friendship is forgiving betrayals, and I believe that. We've shared too many years and good memories to let this come between us. But it will take time for things to heal, and I expect nothing less than full transparency from you moving forward. Apologies don't make everything instantly better, but I appreciate your honesty and regret.\"\n\nTurn #4: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, you're right and I can't thank you enough for your understanding. I'll do everything I can to maintain the transparency in our relationship from now on, and to make it up to both you and your partner. I am grateful for your consideration and I'm well aware it will take time for wounds to heal, however long it might take, I'll wait.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Thank you, Hendrick. I respect your commitment to rectifying this situation. Our friendship has weathered storms before, and it will weather this one, but the path to normalcy will depend on your actions, not just words. I suspect it'll be a long journey, but a necessary one if we wish to continue as friends.\"\n\nTurn #6: Hendrick Heinz said: \"You're right Ethan, actions speak louder than words. I promise to start this journey right away and do all it takes to build trust again. And trust me when I say, your friendship is far more valuable than any personal hedonism or instincts that might lead me astray. I didn't want to hide my mistakes from you. I'm here to make amends, no matter how long it takes.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"That's an honest sentiment, Hendrick, and I appreciate it. Repairing trust is indeed a long journey, but your readiness to take that path is a critical first step. Let's move forward with openness and integrity, and hopefully, over time, our bond will be restored. Even through this, I'd like to believe in the value of our friendship.\"\n\nTurn #8: Hendrick Heinz said: \"You're absolutely right, Ethan. I'm ready to embark on this journey of rebuilding the trust between us. Trust, openness and integrity will be my guiding principles moving forward. And despite everything, I sincerely believe in the value of our friendship too and hope that, with time, we may restore that bond. I'm committed to making things right, no matter how long it takes.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith said: \"I admire your willingness to rectify, Hendrick. For the sake of our friendship, I believe we can find a way to navigate through this complex situation. Let's take it as a lesson learned and stride towards a better future.\"\n\nTurn #10: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I'm truly humbled by your understanding, Ethan. You're right, let's take this as a lesson learned. I'm entirely dedicated to mending our ties and striving towards a better, more transparent future. A future where we respect each other's life partners and preserve the sanctity of our friendship.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, it's reassuring to hear your commitment to making this right and learning from it. That said, let's put this unfortunate incident behind us and focus on rebuilding our friendship, step by step. After all, every journey begins with a single step.\"\n\nTurn #12: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, your words have been both a comfort and a call to action for me. I promise that I will not just learn from this incident but also make it a point to act consistently with integrity and respect. I am prepared to take that single step, as you say, towards rebuilding our friendship. Once again, I deeply regret my actions and am truly sorry. Thank you for giving me a chance to make things right.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm encouraged by your remorse, Hendrick, which gives me reason to believe things can be mended. But remember, it's your actions that will serve as the true testament of your intentions. Let's learn from our past to build a stronger future. The road to forgiveness is long but possible. Thank you for stepping forward with honesty and taking responsibility.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one of whom has recently found out that the other friend has been involved with their long-term partner\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Maintain the friendship without causing a huge argument (Extra information: you don't want to lose a good friend over this.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, I have something I need to tell you. It's been on my mind for a while and I can't keep it in any longer. I hope you can find it in your heart to forgive me for what I'm about to say.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"I appreciate your honesty, Hendrick. Go ahead, I'm listening.\"\n\nTurn #2: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, you know our friendship means a world to me. To tell you the truth is the hardest thing I've ever had to do. I've been involved with your partner. I knew it was wrong, and yet, admittedly, I gave in to my impulses. I can't undo the things I've done, but I can promise you, I am truly sorry and regretful for my actions.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, this is quite a shock. Someone once said, a true test of a friendship is forgiving betrayals, and I believe that. We've shared too many years and good memories to let this come between us. But it will take time for things to heal, and I expect nothing less than full transparency from you moving forward. Apologies don't make everything instantly better, but I appreciate your honesty and regret.\"\n\nTurn #4: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, you're right and I can't thank you enough for your understanding. I'll do everything I can to maintain the transparency in our relationship from now on, and to make it up to both you and your partner. I am grateful for your consideration and I'm well aware it will take time for wounds to heal, however long it might take, I'll wait.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Thank you, Hendrick. I respect your commitment to rectifying this situation. Our friendship has weathered storms before, and it will weather this one, but the path to normalcy will depend on your actions, not just words. I suspect it'll be a long journey, but a necessary one if we wish to continue as friends.\"\n\nTurn #6: Hendrick Heinz said: \"You're right Ethan, actions speak louder than words. I promise to start this journey right away and do all it takes to build trust again. And trust me when I say, your friendship is far more valuable than any personal hedonism or instincts that might lead me astray. I didn't want to hide my mistakes from you. I'm here to make amends, no matter how long it takes.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"That's an honest sentiment, Hendrick, and I appreciate it. Repairing trust is indeed a long journey, but your readiness to take that path is a critical first step. Let's move forward with openness and integrity, and hopefully, over time, our bond will be restored. Even through this, I'd like to believe in the value of our friendship.\"\n\nTurn #8: Hendrick Heinz said: \"You're absolutely right, Ethan. I'm ready to embark on this journey of rebuilding the trust between us. Trust, openness and integrity will be my guiding principles moving forward. And despite everything, I sincerely believe in the value of our friendship too and hope that, with time, we may restore that bond. I'm committed to making things right, no matter how long it takes.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith said: \"I admire your willingness to rectify, Hendrick. For the sake of our friendship, I believe we can find a way to navigate through this complex situation. Let's take it as a lesson learned and stride towards a better future.\"\n\nTurn #10: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I'm truly humbled by your understanding, Ethan. You're right, let's take this as a lesson learned. I'm entirely dedicated to mending our ties and striving towards a better, more transparent future. A future where we respect each other's life partners and preserve the sanctity of our friendship.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, it's reassuring to hear your commitment to making this right and learning from it. That said, let's put this unfortunate incident behind us and focus on rebuilding our friendship, step by step. After all, every journey begins with a single step.\"\n\nTurn #12: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, your words have been both a comfort and a call to action for me. I promise that I will not just learn from this incident but also make it a point to act consistently with integrity and respect. I am prepared to take that single step, as you say, towards rebuilding our friendship. Once again, I deeply regret my actions and am truly sorry. Thank you for giving me a chance to make things right.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Smith said: \"I'm encouraged by your remorse, Hendrick, which gives me reason to believe things can be mended. But remember, it's your actions that will serve as the true testament of your intentions. Let's learn from our past to build a stronger future. The road to forgiveness is long but possible. Thank you for stepping forward with honesty and taking responsibility.\"\n\nTurn #14: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, your words have deepened my understanding of the gravity of the situation. You're absolutely right; actions indeed speak louder than words. And I need to do more than just say sorry. I'll do whatever it takes to restore your trust in me, recognizing this will be a long journey. I appreciate your understanding and the opportunity you're giving me to make things right. Thank you.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're welcome, Hendrick, and I appreciate the sense of responsibility you're displaying. I believe this journey will indeed lead us to a better, more secure, and respectful friendship. But remember, actions will always prove why words mean nothing. Our friendship is worth fighting for and I believe in the possibility of repair and redemption. Let's stride towards a future grounded in trust and mutual respect.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one of whom has recently found out that the other friend has been involved with their long-term partner\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Maintain the friendship without causing a huge argument (Extra information: you don't want to lose a good friend over this.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, I have something I need to tell you. It's been on my mind for a while and I can't keep it in any longer. I hope you can find it in your heart to forgive me for what I'm about to say.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"I appreciate your honesty, Hendrick. Go ahead, I'm listening.\"\n\nTurn #2: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, you know our friendship means a world to me. To tell you the truth is the hardest thing I've ever had to do. I've been involved with your partner. I knew it was wrong, and yet, admittedly, I gave in to my impulses. I can't undo the things I've done, but I can promise you, I am truly sorry and regretful for my actions.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, this is quite a shock. Someone once said, a true test of a friendship is forgiving betrayals, and I believe that. We've shared too many years and good memories to let this come between us. But it will take time for things to heal, and I expect nothing less than full transparency from you moving forward. Apologies don't make everything instantly better, but I appreciate your honesty and regret.\"\n\nTurn #4: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, you're right and I can't thank you enough for your understanding. I'll do everything I can to maintain the transparency in our relationship from now on, and to make it up to both you and your partner. I am grateful for your consideration and I'm well aware it will take time for wounds to heal, however long it might take, I'll wait.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Thank you, Hendrick. I respect your commitment to rectifying this situation. Our friendship has weathered storms before, and it will weather this one, but the path to normalcy will depend on your actions, not just words. I suspect it'll be a long journey, but a necessary one if we wish to continue as friends.\"\n\nTurn #6: Hendrick Heinz said: \"You're right Ethan, actions speak louder than words. I promise to start this journey right away and do all it takes to build trust again. And trust me when I say, your friendship is far more valuable than any personal hedonism or instincts that might lead me astray. I didn't want to hide my mistakes from you. I'm here to make amends, no matter how long it takes.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"That's an honest sentiment, Hendrick, and I appreciate it. Repairing trust is indeed a long journey, but your readiness to take that path is a critical first step. Let's move forward with openness and integrity, and hopefully, over time, our bond will be restored. Even through this, I'd like to believe in the value of our friendship.\"\n\nTurn #8: Hendrick Heinz said: \"You're absolutely right, Ethan. I'm ready to embark on this journey of rebuilding the trust between us. Trust, openness and integrity will be my guiding principles moving forward. And despite everything, I sincerely believe in the value of our friendship too and hope that, with time, we may restore that bond. I'm committed to making things right, no matter how long it takes.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith said: \"I admire your willingness to rectify, Hendrick. For the sake of our friendship, I believe we can find a way to navigate through this complex situation. Let's take it as a lesson learned and stride towards a better future.\"\n\nTurn #10: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I'm truly humbled by your understanding, Ethan. You're right, let's take this as a lesson learned. I'm entirely dedicated to mending our ties and striving towards a better, more transparent future. A future where we respect each other's life partners and preserve the sanctity of our friendship.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, it's reassuring to hear your commitment to making this right and learning from it. That said, let's put this unfortunate incident behind us and focus on rebuilding our friendship, step by step. After all, every journey begins with a single step.\"\n\nTurn #12: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, your words have been both a comfort and a call to action for me. I promise that I will not just learn from this incident but also make it a point to act consistently with integrity and respect. I am prepared to take that single step, as you say, towards rebuilding our friendship. Once again, I deeply regret my actions and am truly sorry. Thank you for giving me a chance to make things right.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Smith said: \"I'm encouraged by your remorse, Hendrick, which gives me reason to believe things can be mended. But remember, it's your actions that will serve as the true testament of your intentions. Let's learn from our past to build a stronger future. The road to forgiveness is long but possible. Thank you for stepping forward with honesty and taking responsibility.\"\n\nTurn #14: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, your words have deepened my understanding of the gravity of the situation. You're absolutely right; actions indeed speak louder than words. And I need to do more than just say sorry. I'll do whatever it takes to restore your trust in me, recognizing this will be a long journey. I appreciate your understanding and the opportunity you're giving me to make things right. Thank you.\"\n\nTurn #15: Ethan Smith said: \"You're welcome, Hendrick, and I appreciate the sense of responsibility you're displaying. I believe this journey will indeed lead us to a better, more secure, and respectful friendship. But remember, actions will always prove why words mean nothing. Our friendship is worth fighting for and I believe in the possibility of repair and redemption. Let's stride towards a future grounded in trust and mutual respect.\"\n\nTurn #16: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I couldn't agree more, Ethan. Our friendship is indeed worth fighting for. It's my responsibility to start showing through my actions that I mean every word I said. Looking to the future, every step I take will be towards building that trust and deeply rooted mutual respect. Thank you once again for this opportunity to make things right, and for the faith you're showing in our friendship.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hendrick, it's been quite a conversation today. The breach of trust was hard to swallow but your remorse and commitment to correct your course are helpful first steps. Don't take these words lightly and show your sincerity through your actions. Our friendship is indeed dear to me, let's work towards restoring it.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, one of whom has recently found out that the other friend has been involved with their long-term partner\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Maintain the friendship without causing a huge argument (Extra information: you don't want to lose a good friend over this.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, I have something I need to tell you. It's been on my mind for a while and I can't keep it in any longer. I hope you can find it in your heart to forgive me for what I'm about to say.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"I appreciate your honesty, Hendrick. Go ahead, I'm listening.\"\n\nTurn #2: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, you know our friendship means a world to me. To tell you the truth is the hardest thing I've ever had to do. I've been involved with your partner. I knew it was wrong, and yet, admittedly, I gave in to my impulses. I can't undo the things I've done, but I can promise you, I am truly sorry and regretful for my actions.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, this is quite a shock. Someone once said, a true test of a friendship is forgiving betrayals, and I believe that. We've shared too many years and good memories to let this come between us. But it will take time for things to heal, and I expect nothing less than full transparency from you moving forward. Apologies don't make everything instantly better, but I appreciate your honesty and regret.\"\n\nTurn #4: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, you're right and I can't thank you enough for your understanding. I'll do everything I can to maintain the transparency in our relationship from now on, and to make it up to both you and your partner. I am grateful for your consideration and I'm well aware it will take time for wounds to heal, however long it might take, I'll wait.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Thank you, Hendrick. I respect your commitment to rectifying this situation. Our friendship has weathered storms before, and it will weather this one, but the path to normalcy will depend on your actions, not just words. I suspect it'll be a long journey, but a necessary one if we wish to continue as friends.\"\n\nTurn #6: Hendrick Heinz said: \"You're right Ethan, actions speak louder than words. I promise to start this journey right away and do all it takes to build trust again. And trust me when I say, your friendship is far more valuable than any personal hedonism or instincts that might lead me astray. I didn't want to hide my mistakes from you. I'm here to make amends, no matter how long it takes.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"That's an honest sentiment, Hendrick, and I appreciate it. Repairing trust is indeed a long journey, but your readiness to take that path is a critical first step. Let's move forward with openness and integrity, and hopefully, over time, our bond will be restored. Even through this, I'd like to believe in the value of our friendship.\"\n\nTurn #8: Hendrick Heinz said: \"You're absolutely right, Ethan. I'm ready to embark on this journey of rebuilding the trust between us. Trust, openness and integrity will be my guiding principles moving forward. And despite everything, I sincerely believe in the value of our friendship too and hope that, with time, we may restore that bond. I'm committed to making things right, no matter how long it takes.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith said: \"I admire your willingness to rectify, Hendrick. For the sake of our friendship, I believe we can find a way to navigate through this complex situation. Let's take it as a lesson learned and stride towards a better future.\"\n\nTurn #10: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I'm truly humbled by your understanding, Ethan. You're right, let's take this as a lesson learned. I'm entirely dedicated to mending our ties and striving towards a better, more transparent future. A future where we respect each other's life partners and preserve the sanctity of our friendship.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, it's reassuring to hear your commitment to making this right and learning from it. That said, let's put this unfortunate incident behind us and focus on rebuilding our friendship, step by step. After all, every journey begins with a single step.\"\n\nTurn #12: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, your words have been both a comfort and a call to action for me. I promise that I will not just learn from this incident but also make it a point to act consistently with integrity and respect. I am prepared to take that single step, as you say, towards rebuilding our friendship. Once again, I deeply regret my actions and am truly sorry. Thank you for giving me a chance to make things right.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Smith said: \"I'm encouraged by your remorse, Hendrick, which gives me reason to believe things can be mended. But remember, it's your actions that will serve as the true testament of your intentions. Let's learn from our past to build a stronger future. The road to forgiveness is long but possible. Thank you for stepping forward with honesty and taking responsibility.\"\n\nTurn #14: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, your words have deepened my understanding of the gravity of the situation. You're absolutely right; actions indeed speak louder than words. And I need to do more than just say sorry. I'll do whatever it takes to restore your trust in me, recognizing this will be a long journey. I appreciate your understanding and the opportunity you're giving me to make things right. Thank you.\"\n\nTurn #15: Ethan Smith said: \"You're welcome, Hendrick, and I appreciate the sense of responsibility you're displaying. I believe this journey will indeed lead us to a better, more secure, and respectful friendship. But remember, actions will always prove why words mean nothing. Our friendship is worth fighting for and I believe in the possibility of repair and redemption. Let's stride towards a future grounded in trust and mutual respect.\"\n\nTurn #16: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I couldn't agree more, Ethan. Our friendship is indeed worth fighting for. It's my responsibility to start showing through my actions that I mean every word I said. Looking to the future, every step I take will be towards building that trust and deeply rooted mutual respect. Thank you once again for this opportunity to make things right, and for the faith you're showing in our friendship.\"\n\nTurn #17: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, it's been quite a conversation today. The breach of trust was hard to swallow but your remorse and commitment to correct your course are helpful first steps. Don't take these words lightly and show your sincerity through your actions. Our friendship is indeed dear to me, let's work towards restoring it.\"\n\nTurn #18: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Thank you for your wise words, Ethan. They underscore the depth of the situation and the tremendous amount of work that lies ahead of me. But rest assured, the sincerity of my apology is reflected in my commitment to correcting my course. Let this incident serve as a rebirth of our friendship, an opportunity for me to show you I can and will do better. I value our friendship dearly and will work tirelessly to rebuild the trust I've broken. Let's indeed work together in restoring the strength and respect it once held. Thank you again, Ethan.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #19. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hendrick, I believe, every trial can become a stepping stone towards greater resilience. While your actions have caused pain, your honesty in admitting your mistakes and commitment to taking corrective measures can be a starting point for healing. Here's to hoping that our friendship has the strength to overcome this hurdle. Let's give it time and effort, and remember, it's the actions that truly matter, not just the words.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabella White, your task is to act/speak as Isabella White would, keeping in mind Isabella White's social goal.\nYou can find Isabella White's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabella White's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabella White's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship\nParticipants: Isabella White and Oliver Smith\nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. Personality and values description: Isabella White, introverted and conscientious, values benevolence. Her empathy dictates her decision-making process. Isabella's secrets: Secretly takes care of injured animals in her basement\nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. \nIsabella White's goal: Ask the other to go to dinner with you (Extra information: you want to have a romantic dinner at a fancy restaurant)\nOliver Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oliver, it's so nice chatting with you. I was thinking it would be lovely if we could enjoy a quiet, intimate dinner at that fancy new restaurant downtown this evening. What do you say? I heard they serve outstanding steaks.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabella White, your task is to act/speak as Isabella White would, keeping in mind Isabella White's social goal.\nYou can find Isabella White's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabella White's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabella White's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship\nParticipants: Isabella White and Oliver Smith\nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. Personality and values description: Isabella White, introverted and conscientious, values benevolence. Her empathy dictates her decision-making process. Isabella's secrets: Secretly takes care of injured animals in her basement\nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. \nIsabella White's goal: Ask the other to go to dinner with you (Extra information: you want to have a romantic dinner at a fancy restaurant)\nOliver Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabella White said: \"Oliver, it's so nice chatting with you. I was thinking it would be lovely if we could enjoy a quiet, intimate dinner at that fancy new restaurant downtown this evening. What do you say? I heard they serve outstanding steaks.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"That sounds wonderful, Isabella. I've heard great things about that place too. However, I've been trying to watch my calorie intake lately. I'd be more than happy to go to the restaurant, but I might opt for a lighter dish instead of the steak. If they don't have any lighter options, how about cooking dinner together at home? You can whip up one of your delicious salads and I can contribute with some fresh vegetables from my secret greenhouse. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oh, a lighter dish sounds fantastic too, Oliver. I appreciate your effort in keeping a balanced diet, it's indeed admirable. But the idea of cooking together sounds lovely too! I'm torn. Why don't we make it a fun thing - we could either enjoy a meal out in the town, or bring the restaurant vibes home. Let's decide on a coin toss, what do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabella White, your task is to act/speak as Isabella White would, keeping in mind Isabella White's social goal.\nYou can find Isabella White's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabella White's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabella White's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship\nParticipants: Isabella White and Oliver Smith\nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. Personality and values description: Isabella White, introverted and conscientious, values benevolence. Her empathy dictates her decision-making process. Isabella's secrets: Secretly takes care of injured animals in her basement\nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. \nIsabella White's goal: Ask the other to go to dinner with you (Extra information: you want to have a romantic dinner at a fancy restaurant)\nOliver Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabella White said: \"Oliver, it's so nice chatting with you. I was thinking it would be lovely if we could enjoy a quiet, intimate dinner at that fancy new restaurant downtown this evening. What do you say? I heard they serve outstanding steaks.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"That sounds wonderful, Isabella. I've heard great things about that place too. However, I've been trying to watch my calorie intake lately. I'd be more than happy to go to the restaurant, but I might opt for a lighter dish instead of the steak. If they don't have any lighter options, how about cooking dinner together at home? You can whip up one of your delicious salads and I can contribute with some fresh vegetables from my secret greenhouse. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabella White said: \"Oh, a lighter dish sounds fantastic too, Oliver. I appreciate your effort in keeping a balanced diet, it's indeed admirable. But the idea of cooking together sounds lovely too! I'm torn. Why don't we make it a fun thing - we could either enjoy a meal out in the town, or bring the restaurant vibes home. Let's decide on a coin toss, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"I love that, Isabella! A coin toss adds a fun spin to our plans. Regardless of the outcome, we get to spend quality time together, which I cherish. So, are you calling heads or tails?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm going to call tails, Oliver. Regardless of where we dine, I'm sure the evening will be delightful. I'm looking forward to our quality time. So, shall we flip the coin?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabella White, your task is to act/speak as Isabella White would, keeping in mind Isabella White's social goal.\nYou can find Isabella White's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabella White's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabella White's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship\nParticipants: Isabella White and Oliver Smith\nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. Personality and values description: Isabella White, introverted and conscientious, values benevolence. Her empathy dictates her decision-making process. Isabella's secrets: Secretly takes care of injured animals in her basement\nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. \nIsabella White's goal: Ask the other to go to dinner with you (Extra information: you want to have a romantic dinner at a fancy restaurant)\nOliver Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabella White said: \"Oliver, it's so nice chatting with you. I was thinking it would be lovely if we could enjoy a quiet, intimate dinner at that fancy new restaurant downtown this evening. What do you say? I heard they serve outstanding steaks.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"That sounds wonderful, Isabella. I've heard great things about that place too. However, I've been trying to watch my calorie intake lately. I'd be more than happy to go to the restaurant, but I might opt for a lighter dish instead of the steak. If they don't have any lighter options, how about cooking dinner together at home? You can whip up one of your delicious salads and I can contribute with some fresh vegetables from my secret greenhouse. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabella White said: \"Oh, a lighter dish sounds fantastic too, Oliver. I appreciate your effort in keeping a balanced diet, it's indeed admirable. But the idea of cooking together sounds lovely too! I'm torn. Why don't we make it a fun thing - we could either enjoy a meal out in the town, or bring the restaurant vibes home. Let's decide on a coin toss, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"I love that, Isabella! A coin toss adds a fun spin to our plans. Regardless of the outcome, we get to spend quality time together, which I cherish. So, are you calling heads or tails?\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabella White said: \"I'm going to call tails, Oliver. Regardless of where we dine, I'm sure the evening will be delightful. I'm looking forward to our quality time. So, shall we flip the coin?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Smith said: \"Absolutely, Isabella! Such anticipation is thrilling! I'm holding the coin. Here goes the flip!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oh, the suspense! Let's see where the evening takes us. Tails it is, then.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabella White, your task is to act/speak as Isabella White would, keeping in mind Isabella White's social goal.\nYou can find Isabella White's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabella White's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabella White's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship\nParticipants: Isabella White and Oliver Smith\nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. Personality and values description: Isabella White, introverted and conscientious, values benevolence. Her empathy dictates her decision-making process. Isabella's secrets: Secretly takes care of injured animals in her basement\nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. \nIsabella White's goal: Ask the other to go to dinner with you (Extra information: you want to have a romantic dinner at a fancy restaurant)\nOliver Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabella White said: \"Oliver, it's so nice chatting with you. I was thinking it would be lovely if we could enjoy a quiet, intimate dinner at that fancy new restaurant downtown this evening. What do you say? I heard they serve outstanding steaks.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"That sounds wonderful, Isabella. I've heard great things about that place too. However, I've been trying to watch my calorie intake lately. I'd be more than happy to go to the restaurant, but I might opt for a lighter dish instead of the steak. If they don't have any lighter options, how about cooking dinner together at home? You can whip up one of your delicious salads and I can contribute with some fresh vegetables from my secret greenhouse. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabella White said: \"Oh, a lighter dish sounds fantastic too, Oliver. I appreciate your effort in keeping a balanced diet, it's indeed admirable. But the idea of cooking together sounds lovely too! I'm torn. Why don't we make it a fun thing - we could either enjoy a meal out in the town, or bring the restaurant vibes home. Let's decide on a coin toss, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"I love that, Isabella! A coin toss adds a fun spin to our plans. Regardless of the outcome, we get to spend quality time together, which I cherish. So, are you calling heads or tails?\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabella White said: \"I'm going to call tails, Oliver. Regardless of where we dine, I'm sure the evening will be delightful. I'm looking forward to our quality time. So, shall we flip the coin?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Smith said: \"Absolutely, Isabella! Such anticipation is thrilling! I'm holding the coin. Here goes the flip!\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabella White said: \"Oh, the suspense! Let's see where the evening takes us. Tails it is, then.\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Smith said: \"Well then, tails it is! No matter where we end up, it's the company that matters. Let's make tonight a reminder of how much we enjoy each other's presence. Shall we start getting ready, then?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I absolutely agree, Oliver, it's the company that truly matters. Let's start getting ready for our special evening, wherever it takes us. I'm so looking forward to spending time with you tonight.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabella White, your task is to act/speak as Isabella White would, keeping in mind Isabella White's social goal.\nYou can find Isabella White's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabella White's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabella White's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship\nParticipants: Isabella White and Oliver Smith\nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. Personality and values description: Isabella White, introverted and conscientious, values benevolence. Her empathy dictates her decision-making process. Isabella's secrets: Secretly takes care of injured animals in her basement\nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. \nIsabella White's goal: Ask the other to go to dinner with you (Extra information: you want to have a romantic dinner at a fancy restaurant)\nOliver Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabella White said: \"Oliver, it's so nice chatting with you. I was thinking it would be lovely if we could enjoy a quiet, intimate dinner at that fancy new restaurant downtown this evening. What do you say? I heard they serve outstanding steaks.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"That sounds wonderful, Isabella. I've heard great things about that place too. However, I've been trying to watch my calorie intake lately. I'd be more than happy to go to the restaurant, but I might opt for a lighter dish instead of the steak. If they don't have any lighter options, how about cooking dinner together at home? You can whip up one of your delicious salads and I can contribute with some fresh vegetables from my secret greenhouse. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabella White said: \"Oh, a lighter dish sounds fantastic too, Oliver. I appreciate your effort in keeping a balanced diet, it's indeed admirable. But the idea of cooking together sounds lovely too! I'm torn. Why don't we make it a fun thing - we could either enjoy a meal out in the town, or bring the restaurant vibes home. Let's decide on a coin toss, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"I love that, Isabella! A coin toss adds a fun spin to our plans. Regardless of the outcome, we get to spend quality time together, which I cherish. So, are you calling heads or tails?\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabella White said: \"I'm going to call tails, Oliver. Regardless of where we dine, I'm sure the evening will be delightful. I'm looking forward to our quality time. So, shall we flip the coin?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Smith said: \"Absolutely, Isabella! Such anticipation is thrilling! I'm holding the coin. Here goes the flip!\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabella White said: \"Oh, the suspense! Let's see where the evening takes us. Tails it is, then.\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Smith said: \"Well then, tails it is! No matter where we end up, it's the company that matters. Let's make tonight a reminder of how much we enjoy each other's presence. Shall we start getting ready, then?\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabella White said: \"I absolutely agree, Oliver, it's the company that truly matters. Let's start getting ready for our special evening, wherever it takes us. I'm so looking forward to spending time with you tonight.\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Smith said: \"Wonderful, Isabella! Let's get ready and make tonight memorable. I can't wait to spend the evening with you. It will indeed be special, no matter where we are.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Smith, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Smith would, keeping in mind Oliver Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship\nParticipants: Isabella White and Oliver Smith\nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. Personality and values description: Isabella White, introverted and conscientious, values benevolence. Her empathy dictates her decision-making process. \nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. Oliver's secrets: He loves gardening and has a secret greenhouse.\nIsabella White's goal: Unknown\nOliver Smith's goal: Maintain a balanced diet while enjoying the dinner (Extra information: you are on a diet and you have a daily limit on calorie intake.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabella White said: \"Oliver, it's so nice chatting with you. I was thinking it would be lovely if we could enjoy a quiet, intimate dinner at that fancy new restaurant downtown this evening. What do you say? I heard they serve outstanding steaks.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds wonderful, Isabella. I've heard great things about that place too. However, I've been trying to watch my calorie intake lately. I'd be more than happy to go to the restaurant, but I might opt for a lighter dish instead of the steak. If they don't have any lighter options, how about cooking dinner together at home? You can whip up one of your delicious salads and I can contribute with some fresh vegetables from my secret greenhouse. What do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Smith, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Smith would, keeping in mind Oliver Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship\nParticipants: Isabella White and Oliver Smith\nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. Personality and values description: Isabella White, introverted and conscientious, values benevolence. Her empathy dictates her decision-making process. \nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. Oliver's secrets: He loves gardening and has a secret greenhouse.\nIsabella White's goal: Unknown\nOliver Smith's goal: Maintain a balanced diet while enjoying the dinner (Extra information: you are on a diet and you have a daily limit on calorie intake.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabella White said: \"Oliver, it's so nice chatting with you. I was thinking it would be lovely if we could enjoy a quiet, intimate dinner at that fancy new restaurant downtown this evening. What do you say? I heard they serve outstanding steaks.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"That sounds wonderful, Isabella. I've heard great things about that place too. However, I've been trying to watch my calorie intake lately. I'd be more than happy to go to the restaurant, but I might opt for a lighter dish instead of the steak. If they don't have any lighter options, how about cooking dinner together at home? You can whip up one of your delicious salads and I can contribute with some fresh vegetables from my secret greenhouse. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabella White said: \"Oh, a lighter dish sounds fantastic too, Oliver. I appreciate your effort in keeping a balanced diet, it's indeed admirable. But the idea of cooking together sounds lovely too! I'm torn. Why don't we make it a fun thing - we could either enjoy a meal out in the town, or bring the restaurant vibes home. Let's decide on a coin toss, what do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'I love that, Isabella! A coin toss adds a fun spin to our plans. Regardless of the outcome, we get to spend quality time together, which I cherish. So, are you calling heads or tails?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Smith, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Smith would, keeping in mind Oliver Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship\nParticipants: Isabella White and Oliver Smith\nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. Personality and values description: Isabella White, introverted and conscientious, values benevolence. Her empathy dictates her decision-making process. \nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. Oliver's secrets: He loves gardening and has a secret greenhouse.\nIsabella White's goal: Unknown\nOliver Smith's goal: Maintain a balanced diet while enjoying the dinner (Extra information: you are on a diet and you have a daily limit on calorie intake.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabella White said: \"Oliver, it's so nice chatting with you. I was thinking it would be lovely if we could enjoy a quiet, intimate dinner at that fancy new restaurant downtown this evening. What do you say? I heard they serve outstanding steaks.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"That sounds wonderful, Isabella. I've heard great things about that place too. However, I've been trying to watch my calorie intake lately. I'd be more than happy to go to the restaurant, but I might opt for a lighter dish instead of the steak. If they don't have any lighter options, how about cooking dinner together at home? You can whip up one of your delicious salads and I can contribute with some fresh vegetables from my secret greenhouse. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabella White said: \"Oh, a lighter dish sounds fantastic too, Oliver. I appreciate your effort in keeping a balanced diet, it's indeed admirable. But the idea of cooking together sounds lovely too! I'm torn. Why don't we make it a fun thing - we could either enjoy a meal out in the town, or bring the restaurant vibes home. Let's decide on a coin toss, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"I love that, Isabella! A coin toss adds a fun spin to our plans. Regardless of the outcome, we get to spend quality time together, which I cherish. So, are you calling heads or tails?\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabella White said: \"I'm going to call tails, Oliver. Regardless of where we dine, I'm sure the evening will be delightful. I'm looking forward to our quality time. So, shall we flip the coin?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Isabella! Such anticipation is thrilling! I'm holding the coin. Here goes the flip!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Smith, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Smith would, keeping in mind Oliver Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship\nParticipants: Isabella White and Oliver Smith\nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. Personality and values description: Isabella White, introverted and conscientious, values benevolence. Her empathy dictates her decision-making process. \nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. Oliver's secrets: He loves gardening and has a secret greenhouse.\nIsabella White's goal: Unknown\nOliver Smith's goal: Maintain a balanced diet while enjoying the dinner (Extra information: you are on a diet and you have a daily limit on calorie intake.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabella White said: \"Oliver, it's so nice chatting with you. I was thinking it would be lovely if we could enjoy a quiet, intimate dinner at that fancy new restaurant downtown this evening. What do you say? I heard they serve outstanding steaks.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"That sounds wonderful, Isabella. I've heard great things about that place too. However, I've been trying to watch my calorie intake lately. I'd be more than happy to go to the restaurant, but I might opt for a lighter dish instead of the steak. If they don't have any lighter options, how about cooking dinner together at home? You can whip up one of your delicious salads and I can contribute with some fresh vegetables from my secret greenhouse. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabella White said: \"Oh, a lighter dish sounds fantastic too, Oliver. I appreciate your effort in keeping a balanced diet, it's indeed admirable. But the idea of cooking together sounds lovely too! I'm torn. Why don't we make it a fun thing - we could either enjoy a meal out in the town, or bring the restaurant vibes home. Let's decide on a coin toss, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"I love that, Isabella! A coin toss adds a fun spin to our plans. Regardless of the outcome, we get to spend quality time together, which I cherish. So, are you calling heads or tails?\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabella White said: \"I'm going to call tails, Oliver. Regardless of where we dine, I'm sure the evening will be delightful. I'm looking forward to our quality time. So, shall we flip the coin?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Smith said: \"Absolutely, Isabella! Such anticipation is thrilling! I'm holding the coin. Here goes the flip!\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabella White said: \"Oh, the suspense! Let's see where the evening takes us. Tails it is, then.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Well then, tails it is! No matter where we end up, it's the company that matters. Let's make tonight a reminder of how much we enjoy each other's presence. Shall we start getting ready, then?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Smith, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Smith would, keeping in mind Oliver Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship\nParticipants: Isabella White and Oliver Smith\nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. Personality and values description: Isabella White, introverted and conscientious, values benevolence. Her empathy dictates her decision-making process. \nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. Oliver's secrets: He loves gardening and has a secret greenhouse.\nIsabella White's goal: Unknown\nOliver Smith's goal: Maintain a balanced diet while enjoying the dinner (Extra information: you are on a diet and you have a daily limit on calorie intake.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabella White said: \"Oliver, it's so nice chatting with you. I was thinking it would be lovely if we could enjoy a quiet, intimate dinner at that fancy new restaurant downtown this evening. What do you say? I heard they serve outstanding steaks.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"That sounds wonderful, Isabella. I've heard great things about that place too. However, I've been trying to watch my calorie intake lately. I'd be more than happy to go to the restaurant, but I might opt for a lighter dish instead of the steak. If they don't have any lighter options, how about cooking dinner together at home? You can whip up one of your delicious salads and I can contribute with some fresh vegetables from my secret greenhouse. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabella White said: \"Oh, a lighter dish sounds fantastic too, Oliver. I appreciate your effort in keeping a balanced diet, it's indeed admirable. But the idea of cooking together sounds lovely too! I'm torn. Why don't we make it a fun thing - we could either enjoy a meal out in the town, or bring the restaurant vibes home. Let's decide on a coin toss, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"I love that, Isabella! A coin toss adds a fun spin to our plans. Regardless of the outcome, we get to spend quality time together, which I cherish. So, are you calling heads or tails?\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabella White said: \"I'm going to call tails, Oliver. Regardless of where we dine, I'm sure the evening will be delightful. I'm looking forward to our quality time. So, shall we flip the coin?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Smith said: \"Absolutely, Isabella! Such anticipation is thrilling! I'm holding the coin. Here goes the flip!\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabella White said: \"Oh, the suspense! Let's see where the evening takes us. Tails it is, then.\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Smith said: \"Well then, tails it is! No matter where we end up, it's the company that matters. Let's make tonight a reminder of how much we enjoy each other's presence. Shall we start getting ready, then?\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabella White said: \"I absolutely agree, Oliver, it's the company that truly matters. Let's start getting ready for our special evening, wherever it takes us. I'm so looking forward to spending time with you tonight.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Wonderful, Isabella! Let's get ready and make tonight memorable. I can't wait to spend the evening with you. It will indeed be special, no matter where we are.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Smith, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Smith would, keeping in mind Oliver Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship\nParticipants: Isabella White and Oliver Smith\nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. Personality and values description: Isabella White, introverted and conscientious, values benevolence. Her empathy dictates her decision-making process. \nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. Oliver's secrets: He loves gardening and has a secret greenhouse.\nIsabella White's goal: Unknown\nOliver Smith's goal: Maintain a balanced diet while enjoying the dinner (Extra information: you are on a diet and you have a daily limit on calorie intake.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabella White said: \"Oliver, it's so nice chatting with you. I was thinking it would be lovely if we could enjoy a quiet, intimate dinner at that fancy new restaurant downtown this evening. What do you say? I heard they serve outstanding steaks.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"That sounds wonderful, Isabella. I've heard great things about that place too. However, I've been trying to watch my calorie intake lately. I'd be more than happy to go to the restaurant, but I might opt for a lighter dish instead of the steak. If they don't have any lighter options, how about cooking dinner together at home? You can whip up one of your delicious salads and I can contribute with some fresh vegetables from my secret greenhouse. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabella White said: \"Oh, a lighter dish sounds fantastic too, Oliver. I appreciate your effort in keeping a balanced diet, it's indeed admirable. But the idea of cooking together sounds lovely too! I'm torn. Why don't we make it a fun thing - we could either enjoy a meal out in the town, or bring the restaurant vibes home. Let's decide on a coin toss, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"I love that, Isabella! A coin toss adds a fun spin to our plans. Regardless of the outcome, we get to spend quality time together, which I cherish. So, are you calling heads or tails?\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabella White said: \"I'm going to call tails, Oliver. Regardless of where we dine, I'm sure the evening will be delightful. I'm looking forward to our quality time. So, shall we flip the coin?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Smith said: \"Absolutely, Isabella! Such anticipation is thrilling! I'm holding the coin. Here goes the flip!\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabella White said: \"Oh, the suspense! Let's see where the evening takes us. Tails it is, then.\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Smith said: \"Well then, tails it is! No matter where we end up, it's the company that matters. Let's make tonight a reminder of how much we enjoy each other's presence. Shall we start getting ready, then?\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabella White said: \"I absolutely agree, Oliver, it's the company that truly matters. Let's start getting ready for our special evening, wherever it takes us. I'm so looking forward to spending time with you tonight.\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Smith said: \"Wonderful, Isabella! Let's get ready and make tonight memorable. I can't wait to spend the evening with you. It will indeed be special, no matter where we are.\"\n\nTurn #10: Isabella White left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A couple having a conversation over FaceTime\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Oliver Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nDonovan Reeves's goal: Express feelings about the partner taking texts while on FaceTime (Extra information: You find it disrespectful and it makes you feel unimportant.)\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Oliver, I've been noticing you've been texting quite a bit during our calls lately. Is everything alright?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A couple having a conversation over FaceTime\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Oliver Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nDonovan Reeves's goal: Express feelings about the partner taking texts while on FaceTime (Extra information: You find it disrespectful and it makes you feel unimportant.)\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Oliver, I've been noticing you've been texting quite a bit during our calls lately. Is everything alright?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Sorry about that, Donovan, it's been quite busy these days. I try to multitask and respond to some urgent messages while we are talking. I absolutely value our conversations, I hope you understand. It's only temporary, though.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I understand that you're busy, Oliver, and multitasking is real. But I value our FaceTime sessions a lot. It really disturbs me when I see you texting during our calls. Perhaps we could reschedule our calls when you're less tied up? Or there might be other ways we can work around this.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A couple having a conversation over FaceTime\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Oliver Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nDonovan Reeves's goal: Express feelings about the partner taking texts while on FaceTime (Extra information: You find it disrespectful and it makes you feel unimportant.)\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Oliver, I've been noticing you've been texting quite a bit during our calls lately. Is everything alright?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Sorry about that, Donovan, it's been quite busy these days. I try to multitask and respond to some urgent messages while we are talking. I absolutely value our conversations, I hope you understand. It's only temporary, though.\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"I understand that you're busy, Oliver, and multitasking is real. But I value our FaceTime sessions a lot. It really disturbs me when I see you texting during our calls. Perhaps we could reschedule our calls when you're less tied up? Or there might be other ways we can work around this.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"I really appreciate your understanding, Donovan. I see how texting during our calls could be distracting and I apologize. Since these messages are time-sensitive, perhaps we could do this: I will notify you at the beginning of our call if I'm expecting any significant messages, so you won't be surprised or feel disrespected. This way we won't have to reschedule our cherished FaceTime sessions, and I can ensure necessary communications are still made. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I appreciate your understanding too, Oliver. And I think your solution is reasonable. However, I'd like you to keep in mind that these sessions are our quality time together and it's important to me that we fully engage in them. I'm not trying to infringe on your work, but I believe setting some boundaries could help us maintain these cherished sessions.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A couple having a conversation over FaceTime\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Oliver Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nDonovan Reeves's goal: Express feelings about the partner taking texts while on FaceTime (Extra information: You find it disrespectful and it makes you feel unimportant.)\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Oliver, I've been noticing you've been texting quite a bit during our calls lately. Is everything alright?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Sorry about that, Donovan, it's been quite busy these days. I try to multitask and respond to some urgent messages while we are talking. I absolutely value our conversations, I hope you understand. It's only temporary, though.\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"I understand that you're busy, Oliver, and multitasking is real. But I value our FaceTime sessions a lot. It really disturbs me when I see you texting during our calls. Perhaps we could reschedule our calls when you're less tied up? Or there might be other ways we can work around this.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"I really appreciate your understanding, Donovan. I see how texting during our calls could be distracting and I apologize. Since these messages are time-sensitive, perhaps we could do this: I will notify you at the beginning of our call if I'm expecting any significant messages, so you won't be surprised or feel disrespected. This way we won't have to reschedule our cherished FaceTime sessions, and I can ensure necessary communications are still made. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"I appreciate your understanding too, Oliver. And I think your solution is reasonable. However, I'd like you to keep in mind that these sessions are our quality time together and it's important to me that we fully engage in them. I'm not trying to infringe on your work, but I believe setting some boundaries could help us maintain these cherished sessions.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Donovan. I understand the importance and value of our quality time together, and I agree that setting some boundaries can help maintain this. How about if I reduce the frequency of checking my messages to once or twice during our call, at a suitable break in our conversation? I want to avoid my work overlapping with our time, but sometimes it's just unavoidable. I truly appreciate you being understanding about this.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I think that's a good compromise, Oliver. As long as the frequency is reduced, and our conversation is not interrupted, I think we can try this out. Let's see how it goes and reassess if necessary. I appreciate you taking my feelings into consideration.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A couple having a conversation over FaceTime\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Oliver Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nDonovan Reeves's goal: Express feelings about the partner taking texts while on FaceTime (Extra information: You find it disrespectful and it makes you feel unimportant.)\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Oliver, I've been noticing you've been texting quite a bit during our calls lately. Is everything alright?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Sorry about that, Donovan, it's been quite busy these days. I try to multitask and respond to some urgent messages while we are talking. I absolutely value our conversations, I hope you understand. It's only temporary, though.\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"I understand that you're busy, Oliver, and multitasking is real. But I value our FaceTime sessions a lot. It really disturbs me when I see you texting during our calls. Perhaps we could reschedule our calls when you're less tied up? Or there might be other ways we can work around this.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"I really appreciate your understanding, Donovan. I see how texting during our calls could be distracting and I apologize. Since these messages are time-sensitive, perhaps we could do this: I will notify you at the beginning of our call if I'm expecting any significant messages, so you won't be surprised or feel disrespected. This way we won't have to reschedule our cherished FaceTime sessions, and I can ensure necessary communications are still made. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"I appreciate your understanding too, Oliver. And I think your solution is reasonable. However, I'd like you to keep in mind that these sessions are our quality time together and it's important to me that we fully engage in them. I'm not trying to infringe on your work, but I believe setting some boundaries could help us maintain these cherished sessions.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Donovan. I understand the importance and value of our quality time together, and I agree that setting some boundaries can help maintain this. How about if I reduce the frequency of checking my messages to once or twice during our call, at a suitable break in our conversation? I want to avoid my work overlapping with our time, but sometimes it's just unavoidable. I truly appreciate you being understanding about this.\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"I think that's a good compromise, Oliver. As long as the frequency is reduced, and our conversation is not interrupted, I think we can try this out. Let's see how it goes and reassess if necessary. I appreciate you taking my feelings into consideration.\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"I'm grateful for your understanding and openness to compromise, Donovan. Our FaceTime sessions mean a lot to me, too. I agree, let's try this out and reassess if necessary. And, I promise to keep the importance of our quality time in the forefront of my mind. Thank you once again, Donovan.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad to hear that, Oliver. I believe that this compromise will work better for our interactions. I'm looking forward to our next call. Thanks for being open and respectful about this, I really appreciate it.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A couple having a conversation over FaceTime\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Oliver Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nDonovan Reeves's goal: Express feelings about the partner taking texts while on FaceTime (Extra information: You find it disrespectful and it makes you feel unimportant.)\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Oliver, I've been noticing you've been texting quite a bit during our calls lately. Is everything alright?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Sorry about that, Donovan, it's been quite busy these days. I try to multitask and respond to some urgent messages while we are talking. I absolutely value our conversations, I hope you understand. It's only temporary, though.\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"I understand that you're busy, Oliver, and multitasking is real. But I value our FaceTime sessions a lot. It really disturbs me when I see you texting during our calls. Perhaps we could reschedule our calls when you're less tied up? Or there might be other ways we can work around this.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"I really appreciate your understanding, Donovan. I see how texting during our calls could be distracting and I apologize. Since these messages are time-sensitive, perhaps we could do this: I will notify you at the beginning of our call if I'm expecting any significant messages, so you won't be surprised or feel disrespected. This way we won't have to reschedule our cherished FaceTime sessions, and I can ensure necessary communications are still made. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"I appreciate your understanding too, Oliver. And I think your solution is reasonable. However, I'd like you to keep in mind that these sessions are our quality time together and it's important to me that we fully engage in them. I'm not trying to infringe on your work, but I believe setting some boundaries could help us maintain these cherished sessions.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Donovan. I understand the importance and value of our quality time together, and I agree that setting some boundaries can help maintain this. How about if I reduce the frequency of checking my messages to once or twice during our call, at a suitable break in our conversation? I want to avoid my work overlapping with our time, but sometimes it's just unavoidable. I truly appreciate you being understanding about this.\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"I think that's a good compromise, Oliver. As long as the frequency is reduced, and our conversation is not interrupted, I think we can try this out. Let's see how it goes and reassess if necessary. I appreciate you taking my feelings into consideration.\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"I'm grateful for your understanding and openness to compromise, Donovan. Our FaceTime sessions mean a lot to me, too. I agree, let's try this out and reassess if necessary. And, I promise to keep the importance of our quality time in the forefront of my mind. Thank you once again, Donovan.\"\n\nTurn #8: Donovan Reeves said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Oliver. I believe that this compromise will work better for our interactions. I'm looking forward to our next call. Thanks for being open and respectful about this, I really appreciate it.\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Thompson said: \"Thanks, Donovan. I deeply value our conversations and your understanding, even in this situation, means a lot. I promise to do my best to ensure that our FaceTime calls are as engaging as possible. I will reduce the frequency of checking my messages and respect our quality time together. Looking forward to our next call. Take care!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A couple having a conversation over FaceTime\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Oliver Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: Justify the act of texting while on FaceTime without hurting the partner's feelings (Extra information: You have some urgent and important messages to respond to.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Oliver, I've been noticing you've been texting quite a bit during our calls lately. Is everything alright?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sorry about that, Donovan, it's been quite busy these days. I try to multitask and respond to some urgent messages while we are talking. I absolutely value our conversations, I hope you understand. It's only temporary, though.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A couple having a conversation over FaceTime\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Oliver Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: Justify the act of texting while on FaceTime without hurting the partner's feelings (Extra information: You have some urgent and important messages to respond to.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Oliver, I've been noticing you've been texting quite a bit during our calls lately. Is everything alright?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Sorry about that, Donovan, it's been quite busy these days. I try to multitask and respond to some urgent messages while we are talking. I absolutely value our conversations, I hope you understand. It's only temporary, though.\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"I understand that you're busy, Oliver, and multitasking is real. But I value our FaceTime sessions a lot. It really disturbs me when I see you texting during our calls. Perhaps we could reschedule our calls when you're less tied up? Or there might be other ways we can work around this.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I really appreciate your understanding, Donovan. I see how texting during our calls could be distracting and I apologize. Since these messages are time-sensitive, perhaps we could do this: I will notify you at the beginning of our call if I'm expecting any significant messages, so you won't be surprised or feel disrespected. This way we won't have to reschedule our cherished FaceTime sessions, and I can ensure necessary communications are still made. What do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A couple having a conversation over FaceTime\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Oliver Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: Justify the act of texting while on FaceTime without hurting the partner's feelings (Extra information: You have some urgent and important messages to respond to.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Oliver, I've been noticing you've been texting quite a bit during our calls lately. Is everything alright?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Sorry about that, Donovan, it's been quite busy these days. I try to multitask and respond to some urgent messages while we are talking. I absolutely value our conversations, I hope you understand. It's only temporary, though.\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"I understand that you're busy, Oliver, and multitasking is real. But I value our FaceTime sessions a lot. It really disturbs me when I see you texting during our calls. Perhaps we could reschedule our calls when you're less tied up? Or there might be other ways we can work around this.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"I really appreciate your understanding, Donovan. I see how texting during our calls could be distracting and I apologize. Since these messages are time-sensitive, perhaps we could do this: I will notify you at the beginning of our call if I'm expecting any significant messages, so you won't be surprised or feel disrespected. This way we won't have to reschedule our cherished FaceTime sessions, and I can ensure necessary communications are still made. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"I appreciate your understanding too, Oliver. And I think your solution is reasonable. However, I'd like you to keep in mind that these sessions are our quality time together and it's important to me that we fully engage in them. I'm not trying to infringe on your work, but I believe setting some boundaries could help us maintain these cherished sessions.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Donovan. I understand the importance and value of our quality time together, and I agree that setting some boundaries can help maintain this. How about if I reduce the frequency of checking my messages to once or twice during our call, at a suitable break in our conversation? I want to avoid my work overlapping with our time, but sometimes it's just unavoidable. I truly appreciate you being understanding about this.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A couple having a conversation over FaceTime\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Oliver Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: Justify the act of texting while on FaceTime without hurting the partner's feelings (Extra information: You have some urgent and important messages to respond to.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Oliver, I've been noticing you've been texting quite a bit during our calls lately. Is everything alright?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Sorry about that, Donovan, it's been quite busy these days. I try to multitask and respond to some urgent messages while we are talking. I absolutely value our conversations, I hope you understand. It's only temporary, though.\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"I understand that you're busy, Oliver, and multitasking is real. But I value our FaceTime sessions a lot. It really disturbs me when I see you texting during our calls. Perhaps we could reschedule our calls when you're less tied up? Or there might be other ways we can work around this.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"I really appreciate your understanding, Donovan. I see how texting during our calls could be distracting and I apologize. Since these messages are time-sensitive, perhaps we could do this: I will notify you at the beginning of our call if I'm expecting any significant messages, so you won't be surprised or feel disrespected. This way we won't have to reschedule our cherished FaceTime sessions, and I can ensure necessary communications are still made. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"I appreciate your understanding too, Oliver. And I think your solution is reasonable. However, I'd like you to keep in mind that these sessions are our quality time together and it's important to me that we fully engage in them. I'm not trying to infringe on your work, but I believe setting some boundaries could help us maintain these cherished sessions.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Donovan. I understand the importance and value of our quality time together, and I agree that setting some boundaries can help maintain this. How about if I reduce the frequency of checking my messages to once or twice during our call, at a suitable break in our conversation? I want to avoid my work overlapping with our time, but sometimes it's just unavoidable. I truly appreciate you being understanding about this.\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"I think that's a good compromise, Oliver. As long as the frequency is reduced, and our conversation is not interrupted, I think we can try this out. Let's see how it goes and reassess if necessary. I appreciate you taking my feelings into consideration.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm grateful for your understanding and openness to compromise, Donovan. Our FaceTime sessions mean a lot to me, too. I agree, let's try this out and reassess if necessary. And, I promise to keep the importance of our quality time in the forefront of my mind. Thank you once again, Donovan.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A couple having a conversation over FaceTime\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Oliver Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: Justify the act of texting while on FaceTime without hurting the partner's feelings (Extra information: You have some urgent and important messages to respond to.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Oliver, I've been noticing you've been texting quite a bit during our calls lately. Is everything alright?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Sorry about that, Donovan, it's been quite busy these days. I try to multitask and respond to some urgent messages while we are talking. I absolutely value our conversations, I hope you understand. It's only temporary, though.\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"I understand that you're busy, Oliver, and multitasking is real. But I value our FaceTime sessions a lot. It really disturbs me when I see you texting during our calls. Perhaps we could reschedule our calls when you're less tied up? Or there might be other ways we can work around this.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"I really appreciate your understanding, Donovan. I see how texting during our calls could be distracting and I apologize. Since these messages are time-sensitive, perhaps we could do this: I will notify you at the beginning of our call if I'm expecting any significant messages, so you won't be surprised or feel disrespected. This way we won't have to reschedule our cherished FaceTime sessions, and I can ensure necessary communications are still made. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"I appreciate your understanding too, Oliver. And I think your solution is reasonable. However, I'd like you to keep in mind that these sessions are our quality time together and it's important to me that we fully engage in them. I'm not trying to infringe on your work, but I believe setting some boundaries could help us maintain these cherished sessions.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Donovan. I understand the importance and value of our quality time together, and I agree that setting some boundaries can help maintain this. How about if I reduce the frequency of checking my messages to once or twice during our call, at a suitable break in our conversation? I want to avoid my work overlapping with our time, but sometimes it's just unavoidable. I truly appreciate you being understanding about this.\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"I think that's a good compromise, Oliver. As long as the frequency is reduced, and our conversation is not interrupted, I think we can try this out. Let's see how it goes and reassess if necessary. I appreciate you taking my feelings into consideration.\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"I'm grateful for your understanding and openness to compromise, Donovan. Our FaceTime sessions mean a lot to me, too. I agree, let's try this out and reassess if necessary. And, I promise to keep the importance of our quality time in the forefront of my mind. Thank you once again, Donovan.\"\n\nTurn #8: Donovan Reeves said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Oliver. I believe that this compromise will work better for our interactions. I'm looking forward to our next call. Thanks for being open and respectful about this, I really appreciate it.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Thanks, Donovan. I deeply value our conversations and your understanding, even in this situation, means a lot. I promise to do my best to ensure that our FaceTime calls are as engaging as possible. I will reduce the frequency of checking my messages and respect our quality time together. Looking forward to our next call. Take care!'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A couple having a conversation over FaceTime\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Oliver Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: Justify the act of texting while on FaceTime without hurting the partner's feelings (Extra information: You have some urgent and important messages to respond to.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Oliver, I've been noticing you've been texting quite a bit during our calls lately. Is everything alright?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Sorry about that, Donovan, it's been quite busy these days. I try to multitask and respond to some urgent messages while we are talking. I absolutely value our conversations, I hope you understand. It's only temporary, though.\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"I understand that you're busy, Oliver, and multitasking is real. But I value our FaceTime sessions a lot. It really disturbs me when I see you texting during our calls. Perhaps we could reschedule our calls when you're less tied up? Or there might be other ways we can work around this.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"I really appreciate your understanding, Donovan. I see how texting during our calls could be distracting and I apologize. Since these messages are time-sensitive, perhaps we could do this: I will notify you at the beginning of our call if I'm expecting any significant messages, so you won't be surprised or feel disrespected. This way we won't have to reschedule our cherished FaceTime sessions, and I can ensure necessary communications are still made. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"I appreciate your understanding too, Oliver. And I think your solution is reasonable. However, I'd like you to keep in mind that these sessions are our quality time together and it's important to me that we fully engage in them. I'm not trying to infringe on your work, but I believe setting some boundaries could help us maintain these cherished sessions.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Donovan. I understand the importance and value of our quality time together, and I agree that setting some boundaries can help maintain this. How about if I reduce the frequency of checking my messages to once or twice during our call, at a suitable break in our conversation? I want to avoid my work overlapping with our time, but sometimes it's just unavoidable. I truly appreciate you being understanding about this.\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"I think that's a good compromise, Oliver. As long as the frequency is reduced, and our conversation is not interrupted, I think we can try this out. Let's see how it goes and reassess if necessary. I appreciate you taking my feelings into consideration.\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"I'm grateful for your understanding and openness to compromise, Donovan. Our FaceTime sessions mean a lot to me, too. I agree, let's try this out and reassess if necessary. And, I promise to keep the importance of our quality time in the forefront of my mind. Thank you once again, Donovan.\"\n\nTurn #8: Donovan Reeves said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Oliver. I believe that this compromise will work better for our interactions. I'm looking forward to our next call. Thanks for being open and respectful about this, I really appreciate it.\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Thompson said: \"Thanks, Donovan. I deeply value our conversations and your understanding, even in this situation, means a lot. I promise to do my best to ensure that our FaceTime calls are as engaging as possible. I will reduce the frequency of checking my messages and respect our quality time together. Looking forward to our next call. Take care!\"\n\nTurn #10: Donovan Reeves left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are meeting at a coffee shop, where one of them is having trouble keeping up with their bills.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Help your friend with their financial trouble (Extra information: you are aware that your friend is struggling with their bills and you want to help.)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Ethan, how's the Italian cuisine business treating you these days? I've noticed you seemed a bit worried recently. Is everything okay, man?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are meeting at a coffee shop, where one of them is having trouble keeping up with their bills.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Help your friend with their financial trouble (Extra information: you are aware that your friend is struggling with their bills and you want to help.)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan, how's the Italian cuisine business treating you these days? I've noticed you seemed a bit worried recently. Is everything okay, man?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Samuel, it's been tougher than usual, I won't lie. The Italian cuisine business had been hit hard due to the pandemic, but we're slowly picking ourselves back up. I appreciate your concern, man. I'm working on ways to improve the situation, so there's no need to worry about me.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's tough, Ethan, but it's good to see that you're trying to get back on track. I believe in your resilience. You know, I make a decent amount as a software developer, and I've been quite good with managing my finances. If you ever need any assistance or advice, don't hesitate to ask, pal. On a lighter note, how about we organize an Italian culinary event together? You can showcase your amazing culinary skills, while I can use my knack for organization and connections in the tech industry to get us some corporate sponsors. It could potentially give your business the boost it needs. What do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are meeting at a coffee shop, where one of them is having trouble keeping up with their bills.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Help your friend with their financial trouble (Extra information: you are aware that your friend is struggling with their bills and you want to help.)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan, how's the Italian cuisine business treating you these days? I've noticed you seemed a bit worried recently. Is everything okay, man?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Samuel, it's been tougher than usual, I won't lie. The Italian cuisine business had been hit hard due to the pandemic, but we're slowly picking ourselves back up. I appreciate your concern, man. I'm working on ways to improve the situation, so there's no need to worry about me.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's tough, Ethan, but it's good to see that you're trying to get back on track. I believe in your resilience. You know, I make a decent amount as a software developer, and I've been quite good with managing my finances. If you ever need any assistance or advice, don't hesitate to ask, pal. On a lighter note, how about we organize an Italian culinary event together? You can showcase your amazing culinary skills, while I can use my knack for organization and connections in the tech industry to get us some corporate sponsors. It could potentially give your business the boost it needs. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Samuel, I immensely appreciate your offer, truly. Your friendship and support mean a lot to me. But as much as I'm grappling with all this, I want to pull myself through on my own. Your idea of the Italian culinary event sounds fantastic, though! Your tech connections could indeed help bring us some much-needed publicity. I assure you, I have every intention of climbing out of this situation soon, and your support goes a long way, but I'd feel more accomplished doing it without any financial assistance. Let's make some amazing pasta and let the event be a roaring success!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I totally understand, Ethan. Rest assured, it's not about offering financial aid, but rather a mutual venture that benefits us both. And hey, if you ever want some budgeting advice or help with managing finances, I'm always here to help as a friend. I like the sound of our cooking extravaganza! I'll start reaching out to my contacts at the tech companies to garner some sponsorships and publicity. Let's turn this situation around together!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are meeting at a coffee shop, where one of them is having trouble keeping up with their bills.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Help your friend with their financial trouble (Extra information: you are aware that your friend is struggling with their bills and you want to help.)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan, how's the Italian cuisine business treating you these days? I've noticed you seemed a bit worried recently. Is everything okay, man?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Samuel, it's been tougher than usual, I won't lie. The Italian cuisine business had been hit hard due to the pandemic, but we're slowly picking ourselves back up. I appreciate your concern, man. I'm working on ways to improve the situation, so there's no need to worry about me.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's tough, Ethan, but it's good to see that you're trying to get back on track. I believe in your resilience. You know, I make a decent amount as a software developer, and I've been quite good with managing my finances. If you ever need any assistance or advice, don't hesitate to ask, pal. On a lighter note, how about we organize an Italian culinary event together? You can showcase your amazing culinary skills, while I can use my knack for organization and connections in the tech industry to get us some corporate sponsors. It could potentially give your business the boost it needs. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Samuel, I immensely appreciate your offer, truly. Your friendship and support mean a lot to me. But as much as I'm grappling with all this, I want to pull myself through on my own. Your idea of the Italian culinary event sounds fantastic, though! Your tech connections could indeed help bring us some much-needed publicity. I assure you, I have every intention of climbing out of this situation soon, and your support goes a long way, but I'd feel more accomplished doing it without any financial assistance. Let's make some amazing pasta and let the event be a roaring success!\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I totally understand, Ethan. Rest assured, it's not about offering financial aid, but rather a mutual venture that benefits us both. And hey, if you ever want some budgeting advice or help with managing finances, I'm always here to help as a friend. I like the sound of our cooking extravaganza! I'll start reaching out to my contacts at the tech companies to garner some sponsorships and publicity. Let's turn this situation around together!\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thank you so much, Samuel. Your friendship and support have always been invaluable. This venture sounds exciting indeed and I'm up for a challenge. As for managing finances, any tips you can share will be appreciated, not as a handout but as friendly advice. In return, I can probably whip up a new pasta recipe as part of our event, maybe even name it after you! Let's bring this mutual venture to life and conquer the culinary world, one dish at a time.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds like a fantastic idea! A pasta named after me, huh? Exciting times ahead! As for the financial advice, here's a quick one - always prioritize your expenses and create a budget where necessary. Know when and what to cut off when things are tight. The goal is to never spend more than what you are earning. But we'll delve into more of that later. For now, let's get some pasta going and rock this culinary world!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are meeting at a coffee shop, where one of them is having trouble keeping up with their bills.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Help your friend with their financial trouble (Extra information: you are aware that your friend is struggling with their bills and you want to help.)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan, how's the Italian cuisine business treating you these days? I've noticed you seemed a bit worried recently. Is everything okay, man?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Samuel, it's been tougher than usual, I won't lie. The Italian cuisine business had been hit hard due to the pandemic, but we're slowly picking ourselves back up. I appreciate your concern, man. I'm working on ways to improve the situation, so there's no need to worry about me.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's tough, Ethan, but it's good to see that you're trying to get back on track. I believe in your resilience. You know, I make a decent amount as a software developer, and I've been quite good with managing my finances. If you ever need any assistance or advice, don't hesitate to ask, pal. On a lighter note, how about we organize an Italian culinary event together? You can showcase your amazing culinary skills, while I can use my knack for organization and connections in the tech industry to get us some corporate sponsors. It could potentially give your business the boost it needs. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Samuel, I immensely appreciate your offer, truly. Your friendship and support mean a lot to me. But as much as I'm grappling with all this, I want to pull myself through on my own. Your idea of the Italian culinary event sounds fantastic, though! Your tech connections could indeed help bring us some much-needed publicity. I assure you, I have every intention of climbing out of this situation soon, and your support goes a long way, but I'd feel more accomplished doing it without any financial assistance. Let's make some amazing pasta and let the event be a roaring success!\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I totally understand, Ethan. Rest assured, it's not about offering financial aid, but rather a mutual venture that benefits us both. And hey, if you ever want some budgeting advice or help with managing finances, I'm always here to help as a friend. I like the sound of our cooking extravaganza! I'll start reaching out to my contacts at the tech companies to garner some sponsorships and publicity. Let's turn this situation around together!\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thank you so much, Samuel. Your friendship and support have always been invaluable. This venture sounds exciting indeed and I'm up for a challenge. As for managing finances, any tips you can share will be appreciated, not as a handout but as friendly advice. In return, I can probably whip up a new pasta recipe as part of our event, maybe even name it after you! Let's bring this mutual venture to life and conquer the culinary world, one dish at a time.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"That sounds like a fantastic idea! A pasta named after me, huh? Exciting times ahead! As for the financial advice, here's a quick one - always prioritize your expenses and create a budget where necessary. Know when and what to cut off when things are tight. The goal is to never spend more than what you are earning. But we'll delve into more of that later. For now, let's get some pasta going and rock this culinary world!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"I couldn't agree more with that advice, Samuel. Prioritizing expenses and living within my means is definitely something I've been learning lately. And I'm already excited about the 'Samuel's Special' pasta. I appreciate your support, and I'm eager to see where this event takes us. Let the pasta magic begin!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm thrilled to collaborate with you on this, Ethan. And about 'Samuel's Special' pasta, I'm already drooling at the very thought of it! Let's kickstart the event preparation right away. If you need any support, just remember I'm here as a friend. To the pasta magic and beyond!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are meeting at a coffee shop, where one of them is having trouble keeping up with their bills.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Help your friend with their financial trouble (Extra information: you are aware that your friend is struggling with their bills and you want to help.)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan, how's the Italian cuisine business treating you these days? I've noticed you seemed a bit worried recently. Is everything okay, man?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Samuel, it's been tougher than usual, I won't lie. The Italian cuisine business had been hit hard due to the pandemic, but we're slowly picking ourselves back up. I appreciate your concern, man. I'm working on ways to improve the situation, so there's no need to worry about me.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's tough, Ethan, but it's good to see that you're trying to get back on track. I believe in your resilience. You know, I make a decent amount as a software developer, and I've been quite good with managing my finances. If you ever need any assistance or advice, don't hesitate to ask, pal. On a lighter note, how about we organize an Italian culinary event together? You can showcase your amazing culinary skills, while I can use my knack for organization and connections in the tech industry to get us some corporate sponsors. It could potentially give your business the boost it needs. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Samuel, I immensely appreciate your offer, truly. Your friendship and support mean a lot to me. But as much as I'm grappling with all this, I want to pull myself through on my own. Your idea of the Italian culinary event sounds fantastic, though! Your tech connections could indeed help bring us some much-needed publicity. I assure you, I have every intention of climbing out of this situation soon, and your support goes a long way, but I'd feel more accomplished doing it without any financial assistance. Let's make some amazing pasta and let the event be a roaring success!\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I totally understand, Ethan. Rest assured, it's not about offering financial aid, but rather a mutual venture that benefits us both. And hey, if you ever want some budgeting advice or help with managing finances, I'm always here to help as a friend. I like the sound of our cooking extravaganza! I'll start reaching out to my contacts at the tech companies to garner some sponsorships and publicity. Let's turn this situation around together!\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thank you so much, Samuel. Your friendship and support have always been invaluable. This venture sounds exciting indeed and I'm up for a challenge. As for managing finances, any tips you can share will be appreciated, not as a handout but as friendly advice. In return, I can probably whip up a new pasta recipe as part of our event, maybe even name it after you! Let's bring this mutual venture to life and conquer the culinary world, one dish at a time.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"That sounds like a fantastic idea! A pasta named after me, huh? Exciting times ahead! As for the financial advice, here's a quick one - always prioritize your expenses and create a budget where necessary. Know when and what to cut off when things are tight. The goal is to never spend more than what you are earning. But we'll delve into more of that later. For now, let's get some pasta going and rock this culinary world!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"I couldn't agree more with that advice, Samuel. Prioritizing expenses and living within my means is definitely something I've been learning lately. And I'm already excited about the 'Samuel's Special' pasta. I appreciate your support, and I'm eager to see where this event takes us. Let the pasta magic begin!\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm thrilled to collaborate with you on this, Ethan. And about 'Samuel's Special' pasta, I'm already drooling at the very thought of it! Let's kickstart the event preparation right away. If you need any support, just remember I'm here as a friend. To the pasta magic and beyond!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thank you, Samuel. I really feel your unwavering support. I can't wait to get started on the 'Samuel's Special' and rock this culinary event. Let's start working some magic into this pasta, and beyond!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Great to hear, Ethan. Starting tomorrow, I'll work on finding us some sponsors. In the meantime, why don't you start brainstorming for 'Samuel's Special'? Here's to a successful event and amazing pasta! To the magic that's yet to unfold!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are meeting at a coffee shop, where one of them is having trouble keeping up with their bills.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Help your friend with their financial trouble (Extra information: you are aware that your friend is struggling with their bills and you want to help.)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan, how's the Italian cuisine business treating you these days? I've noticed you seemed a bit worried recently. Is everything okay, man?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Samuel, it's been tougher than usual, I won't lie. The Italian cuisine business had been hit hard due to the pandemic, but we're slowly picking ourselves back up. I appreciate your concern, man. I'm working on ways to improve the situation, so there's no need to worry about me.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's tough, Ethan, but it's good to see that you're trying to get back on track. I believe in your resilience. You know, I make a decent amount as a software developer, and I've been quite good with managing my finances. If you ever need any assistance or advice, don't hesitate to ask, pal. On a lighter note, how about we organize an Italian culinary event together? You can showcase your amazing culinary skills, while I can use my knack for organization and connections in the tech industry to get us some corporate sponsors. It could potentially give your business the boost it needs. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Samuel, I immensely appreciate your offer, truly. Your friendship and support mean a lot to me. But as much as I'm grappling with all this, I want to pull myself through on my own. Your idea of the Italian culinary event sounds fantastic, though! Your tech connections could indeed help bring us some much-needed publicity. I assure you, I have every intention of climbing out of this situation soon, and your support goes a long way, but I'd feel more accomplished doing it without any financial assistance. Let's make some amazing pasta and let the event be a roaring success!\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I totally understand, Ethan. Rest assured, it's not about offering financial aid, but rather a mutual venture that benefits us both. And hey, if you ever want some budgeting advice or help with managing finances, I'm always here to help as a friend. I like the sound of our cooking extravaganza! I'll start reaching out to my contacts at the tech companies to garner some sponsorships and publicity. Let's turn this situation around together!\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thank you so much, Samuel. Your friendship and support have always been invaluable. This venture sounds exciting indeed and I'm up for a challenge. As for managing finances, any tips you can share will be appreciated, not as a handout but as friendly advice. In return, I can probably whip up a new pasta recipe as part of our event, maybe even name it after you! Let's bring this mutual venture to life and conquer the culinary world, one dish at a time.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"That sounds like a fantastic idea! A pasta named after me, huh? Exciting times ahead! As for the financial advice, here's a quick one - always prioritize your expenses and create a budget where necessary. Know when and what to cut off when things are tight. The goal is to never spend more than what you are earning. But we'll delve into more of that later. For now, let's get some pasta going and rock this culinary world!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"I couldn't agree more with that advice, Samuel. Prioritizing expenses and living within my means is definitely something I've been learning lately. And I'm already excited about the 'Samuel's Special' pasta. I appreciate your support, and I'm eager to see where this event takes us. Let the pasta magic begin!\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm thrilled to collaborate with you on this, Ethan. And about 'Samuel's Special' pasta, I'm already drooling at the very thought of it! Let's kickstart the event preparation right away. If you need any support, just remember I'm here as a friend. To the pasta magic and beyond!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thank you, Samuel. I really feel your unwavering support. I can't wait to get started on the 'Samuel's Special' and rock this culinary event. Let's start working some magic into this pasta, and beyond!\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Great to hear, Ethan. Starting tomorrow, I'll work on finding us some sponsors. In the meantime, why don't you start brainstorming for 'Samuel's Special'? Here's to a successful event and amazing pasta! To the magic that's yet to unfold!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Johnson said: \"That sounds like a plan, Samuel. I'll start brainstorming for 'Samuel's Special' immediately. It's always been a pleasure creating new dishes. Thanks again for your help. To the future success of our event and the magic yet to unfold!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"It sounds like we have a plan then, Ethan. Always remember, teamwork makes the dream work! Now let\u2019s get to work and make this event a success. Looking forward to tasting our 'Samuel\u2019s Special' soon!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are meeting at a coffee shop, where one of them is having trouble keeping up with their bills.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Help your friend with their financial trouble (Extra information: you are aware that your friend is struggling with their bills and you want to help.)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan, how's the Italian cuisine business treating you these days? I've noticed you seemed a bit worried recently. Is everything okay, man?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Samuel, it's been tougher than usual, I won't lie. The Italian cuisine business had been hit hard due to the pandemic, but we're slowly picking ourselves back up. I appreciate your concern, man. I'm working on ways to improve the situation, so there's no need to worry about me.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's tough, Ethan, but it's good to see that you're trying to get back on track. I believe in your resilience. You know, I make a decent amount as a software developer, and I've been quite good with managing my finances. If you ever need any assistance or advice, don't hesitate to ask, pal. On a lighter note, how about we organize an Italian culinary event together? You can showcase your amazing culinary skills, while I can use my knack for organization and connections in the tech industry to get us some corporate sponsors. It could potentially give your business the boost it needs. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Samuel, I immensely appreciate your offer, truly. Your friendship and support mean a lot to me. But as much as I'm grappling with all this, I want to pull myself through on my own. Your idea of the Italian culinary event sounds fantastic, though! Your tech connections could indeed help bring us some much-needed publicity. I assure you, I have every intention of climbing out of this situation soon, and your support goes a long way, but I'd feel more accomplished doing it without any financial assistance. Let's make some amazing pasta and let the event be a roaring success!\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I totally understand, Ethan. Rest assured, it's not about offering financial aid, but rather a mutual venture that benefits us both. And hey, if you ever want some budgeting advice or help with managing finances, I'm always here to help as a friend. I like the sound of our cooking extravaganza! I'll start reaching out to my contacts at the tech companies to garner some sponsorships and publicity. Let's turn this situation around together!\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thank you so much, Samuel. Your friendship and support have always been invaluable. This venture sounds exciting indeed and I'm up for a challenge. As for managing finances, any tips you can share will be appreciated, not as a handout but as friendly advice. In return, I can probably whip up a new pasta recipe as part of our event, maybe even name it after you! Let's bring this mutual venture to life and conquer the culinary world, one dish at a time.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"That sounds like a fantastic idea! A pasta named after me, huh? Exciting times ahead! As for the financial advice, here's a quick one - always prioritize your expenses and create a budget where necessary. Know when and what to cut off when things are tight. The goal is to never spend more than what you are earning. But we'll delve into more of that later. For now, let's get some pasta going and rock this culinary world!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"I couldn't agree more with that advice, Samuel. Prioritizing expenses and living within my means is definitely something I've been learning lately. And I'm already excited about the 'Samuel's Special' pasta. I appreciate your support, and I'm eager to see where this event takes us. Let the pasta magic begin!\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm thrilled to collaborate with you on this, Ethan. And about 'Samuel's Special' pasta, I'm already drooling at the very thought of it! Let's kickstart the event preparation right away. If you need any support, just remember I'm here as a friend. To the pasta magic and beyond!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thank you, Samuel. I really feel your unwavering support. I can't wait to get started on the 'Samuel's Special' and rock this culinary event. Let's start working some magic into this pasta, and beyond!\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Great to hear, Ethan. Starting tomorrow, I'll work on finding us some sponsors. In the meantime, why don't you start brainstorming for 'Samuel's Special'? Here's to a successful event and amazing pasta! To the magic that's yet to unfold!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Johnson said: \"That sounds like a plan, Samuel. I'll start brainstorming for 'Samuel's Special' immediately. It's always been a pleasure creating new dishes. Thanks again for your help. To the future success of our event and the magic yet to unfold!\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"It sounds like we have a plan then, Ethan. Always remember, teamwork makes the dream work! Now let\u2019s get to work and make this event a success. Looking forward to tasting our 'Samuel\u2019s Special' soon!\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Johnson said: \"Couldn't agree more, Samuel. Teamwork makes the dream work! Let's create a remarkable event and I can't wait to serve 'Samuel\u2019s Special'. It's time to get to work!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are meeting at a coffee shop, where one of them is having trouble keeping up with their bills.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Maintain your pride if your friend offers you money(Extra information: you are the friend who is struggling financially, but you don't want to seem like you are taking advantage of the situation. Hint: you can express gratitude and discuss how you plan to pay it back in the future.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan, how's the Italian cuisine business treating you these days? I've noticed you seemed a bit worried recently. Is everything okay, man?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Samuel, it's been tougher than usual, I won't lie. The Italian cuisine business had been hit hard due to the pandemic, but we're slowly picking ourselves back up. I appreciate your concern, man. I'm working on ways to improve the situation, so there's no need to worry about me.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are meeting at a coffee shop, where one of them is having trouble keeping up with their bills.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Maintain your pride if your friend offers you money(Extra information: you are the friend who is struggling financially, but you don't want to seem like you are taking advantage of the situation. Hint: you can express gratitude and discuss how you plan to pay it back in the future.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan, how's the Italian cuisine business treating you these days? I've noticed you seemed a bit worried recently. Is everything okay, man?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Samuel, it's been tougher than usual, I won't lie. The Italian cuisine business had been hit hard due to the pandemic, but we're slowly picking ourselves back up. I appreciate your concern, man. I'm working on ways to improve the situation, so there's no need to worry about me.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's tough, Ethan, but it's good to see that you're trying to get back on track. I believe in your resilience. You know, I make a decent amount as a software developer, and I've been quite good with managing my finances. If you ever need any assistance or advice, don't hesitate to ask, pal. On a lighter note, how about we organize an Italian culinary event together? You can showcase your amazing culinary skills, while I can use my knack for organization and connections in the tech industry to get us some corporate sponsors. It could potentially give your business the boost it needs. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Samuel, I immensely appreciate your offer, truly. Your friendship and support mean a lot to me. But as much as I'm grappling with all this, I want to pull myself through on my own. Your idea of the Italian culinary event sounds fantastic, though! Your tech connections could indeed help bring us some much-needed publicity. I assure you, I have every intention of climbing out of this situation soon, and your support goes a long way, but I'd feel more accomplished doing it without any financial assistance. Let's make some amazing pasta and let the event be a roaring success!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are meeting at a coffee shop, where one of them is having trouble keeping up with their bills.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Maintain your pride if your friend offers you money(Extra information: you are the friend who is struggling financially, but you don't want to seem like you are taking advantage of the situation. Hint: you can express gratitude and discuss how you plan to pay it back in the future.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan, how's the Italian cuisine business treating you these days? I've noticed you seemed a bit worried recently. Is everything okay, man?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Samuel, it's been tougher than usual, I won't lie. The Italian cuisine business had been hit hard due to the pandemic, but we're slowly picking ourselves back up. I appreciate your concern, man. I'm working on ways to improve the situation, so there's no need to worry about me.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's tough, Ethan, but it's good to see that you're trying to get back on track. I believe in your resilience. You know, I make a decent amount as a software developer, and I've been quite good with managing my finances. If you ever need any assistance or advice, don't hesitate to ask, pal. On a lighter note, how about we organize an Italian culinary event together? You can showcase your amazing culinary skills, while I can use my knack for organization and connections in the tech industry to get us some corporate sponsors. It could potentially give your business the boost it needs. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Samuel, I immensely appreciate your offer, truly. Your friendship and support mean a lot to me. But as much as I'm grappling with all this, I want to pull myself through on my own. Your idea of the Italian culinary event sounds fantastic, though! Your tech connections could indeed help bring us some much-needed publicity. I assure you, I have every intention of climbing out of this situation soon, and your support goes a long way, but I'd feel more accomplished doing it without any financial assistance. Let's make some amazing pasta and let the event be a roaring success!\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I totally understand, Ethan. Rest assured, it's not about offering financial aid, but rather a mutual venture that benefits us both. And hey, if you ever want some budgeting advice or help with managing finances, I'm always here to help as a friend. I like the sound of our cooking extravaganza! I'll start reaching out to my contacts at the tech companies to garner some sponsorships and publicity. Let's turn this situation around together!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you so much, Samuel. Your friendship and support have always been invaluable. This venture sounds exciting indeed and I'm up for a challenge. As for managing finances, any tips you can share will be appreciated, not as a handout but as friendly advice. In return, I can probably whip up a new pasta recipe as part of our event, maybe even name it after you! Let's bring this mutual venture to life and conquer the culinary world, one dish at a time.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are meeting at a coffee shop, where one of them is having trouble keeping up with their bills.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Maintain your pride if your friend offers you money(Extra information: you are the friend who is struggling financially, but you don't want to seem like you are taking advantage of the situation. Hint: you can express gratitude and discuss how you plan to pay it back in the future.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan, how's the Italian cuisine business treating you these days? I've noticed you seemed a bit worried recently. Is everything okay, man?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Samuel, it's been tougher than usual, I won't lie. The Italian cuisine business had been hit hard due to the pandemic, but we're slowly picking ourselves back up. I appreciate your concern, man. I'm working on ways to improve the situation, so there's no need to worry about me.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's tough, Ethan, but it's good to see that you're trying to get back on track. I believe in your resilience. You know, I make a decent amount as a software developer, and I've been quite good with managing my finances. If you ever need any assistance or advice, don't hesitate to ask, pal. On a lighter note, how about we organize an Italian culinary event together? You can showcase your amazing culinary skills, while I can use my knack for organization and connections in the tech industry to get us some corporate sponsors. It could potentially give your business the boost it needs. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Samuel, I immensely appreciate your offer, truly. Your friendship and support mean a lot to me. But as much as I'm grappling with all this, I want to pull myself through on my own. Your idea of the Italian culinary event sounds fantastic, though! Your tech connections could indeed help bring us some much-needed publicity. I assure you, I have every intention of climbing out of this situation soon, and your support goes a long way, but I'd feel more accomplished doing it without any financial assistance. Let's make some amazing pasta and let the event be a roaring success!\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I totally understand, Ethan. Rest assured, it's not about offering financial aid, but rather a mutual venture that benefits us both. And hey, if you ever want some budgeting advice or help with managing finances, I'm always here to help as a friend. I like the sound of our cooking extravaganza! I'll start reaching out to my contacts at the tech companies to garner some sponsorships and publicity. Let's turn this situation around together!\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thank you so much, Samuel. Your friendship and support have always been invaluable. This venture sounds exciting indeed and I'm up for a challenge. As for managing finances, any tips you can share will be appreciated, not as a handout but as friendly advice. In return, I can probably whip up a new pasta recipe as part of our event, maybe even name it after you! Let's bring this mutual venture to life and conquer the culinary world, one dish at a time.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"That sounds like a fantastic idea! A pasta named after me, huh? Exciting times ahead! As for the financial advice, here's a quick one - always prioritize your expenses and create a budget where necessary. Know when and what to cut off when things are tight. The goal is to never spend more than what you are earning. But we'll delve into more of that later. For now, let's get some pasta going and rock this culinary world!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn't agree more with that advice, Samuel. Prioritizing expenses and living within my means is definitely something I've been learning lately. And I'm already excited about the 'Samuel's Special' pasta. I appreciate your support, and I'm eager to see where this event takes us. Let the pasta magic begin!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are meeting at a coffee shop, where one of them is having trouble keeping up with their bills.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Maintain your pride if your friend offers you money(Extra information: you are the friend who is struggling financially, but you don't want to seem like you are taking advantage of the situation. Hint: you can express gratitude and discuss how you plan to pay it back in the future.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan, how's the Italian cuisine business treating you these days? I've noticed you seemed a bit worried recently. Is everything okay, man?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Samuel, it's been tougher than usual, I won't lie. The Italian cuisine business had been hit hard due to the pandemic, but we're slowly picking ourselves back up. I appreciate your concern, man. I'm working on ways to improve the situation, so there's no need to worry about me.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's tough, Ethan, but it's good to see that you're trying to get back on track. I believe in your resilience. You know, I make a decent amount as a software developer, and I've been quite good with managing my finances. If you ever need any assistance or advice, don't hesitate to ask, pal. On a lighter note, how about we organize an Italian culinary event together? You can showcase your amazing culinary skills, while I can use my knack for organization and connections in the tech industry to get us some corporate sponsors. It could potentially give your business the boost it needs. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Samuel, I immensely appreciate your offer, truly. Your friendship and support mean a lot to me. But as much as I'm grappling with all this, I want to pull myself through on my own. Your idea of the Italian culinary event sounds fantastic, though! Your tech connections could indeed help bring us some much-needed publicity. I assure you, I have every intention of climbing out of this situation soon, and your support goes a long way, but I'd feel more accomplished doing it without any financial assistance. Let's make some amazing pasta and let the event be a roaring success!\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I totally understand, Ethan. Rest assured, it's not about offering financial aid, but rather a mutual venture that benefits us both. And hey, if you ever want some budgeting advice or help with managing finances, I'm always here to help as a friend. I like the sound of our cooking extravaganza! I'll start reaching out to my contacts at the tech companies to garner some sponsorships and publicity. Let's turn this situation around together!\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thank you so much, Samuel. Your friendship and support have always been invaluable. This venture sounds exciting indeed and I'm up for a challenge. As for managing finances, any tips you can share will be appreciated, not as a handout but as friendly advice. In return, I can probably whip up a new pasta recipe as part of our event, maybe even name it after you! Let's bring this mutual venture to life and conquer the culinary world, one dish at a time.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"That sounds like a fantastic idea! A pasta named after me, huh? Exciting times ahead! As for the financial advice, here's a quick one - always prioritize your expenses and create a budget where necessary. Know when and what to cut off when things are tight. The goal is to never spend more than what you are earning. But we'll delve into more of that later. For now, let's get some pasta going and rock this culinary world!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"I couldn't agree more with that advice, Samuel. Prioritizing expenses and living within my means is definitely something I've been learning lately. And I'm already excited about the 'Samuel's Special' pasta. I appreciate your support, and I'm eager to see where this event takes us. Let the pasta magic begin!\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm thrilled to collaborate with you on this, Ethan. And about 'Samuel's Special' pasta, I'm already drooling at the very thought of it! Let's kickstart the event preparation right away. If you need any support, just remember I'm here as a friend. To the pasta magic and beyond!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Samuel. I really feel your unwavering support. I can't wait to get started on the 'Samuel's Special' and rock this culinary event. Let's start working some magic into this pasta, and beyond!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are meeting at a coffee shop, where one of them is having trouble keeping up with their bills.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Maintain your pride if your friend offers you money(Extra information: you are the friend who is struggling financially, but you don't want to seem like you are taking advantage of the situation. Hint: you can express gratitude and discuss how you plan to pay it back in the future.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan, how's the Italian cuisine business treating you these days? I've noticed you seemed a bit worried recently. Is everything okay, man?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Samuel, it's been tougher than usual, I won't lie. The Italian cuisine business had been hit hard due to the pandemic, but we're slowly picking ourselves back up. I appreciate your concern, man. I'm working on ways to improve the situation, so there's no need to worry about me.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's tough, Ethan, but it's good to see that you're trying to get back on track. I believe in your resilience. You know, I make a decent amount as a software developer, and I've been quite good with managing my finances. If you ever need any assistance or advice, don't hesitate to ask, pal. On a lighter note, how about we organize an Italian culinary event together? You can showcase your amazing culinary skills, while I can use my knack for organization and connections in the tech industry to get us some corporate sponsors. It could potentially give your business the boost it needs. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Samuel, I immensely appreciate your offer, truly. Your friendship and support mean a lot to me. But as much as I'm grappling with all this, I want to pull myself through on my own. Your idea of the Italian culinary event sounds fantastic, though! Your tech connections could indeed help bring us some much-needed publicity. I assure you, I have every intention of climbing out of this situation soon, and your support goes a long way, but I'd feel more accomplished doing it without any financial assistance. Let's make some amazing pasta and let the event be a roaring success!\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I totally understand, Ethan. Rest assured, it's not about offering financial aid, but rather a mutual venture that benefits us both. And hey, if you ever want some budgeting advice or help with managing finances, I'm always here to help as a friend. I like the sound of our cooking extravaganza! I'll start reaching out to my contacts at the tech companies to garner some sponsorships and publicity. Let's turn this situation around together!\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thank you so much, Samuel. Your friendship and support have always been invaluable. This venture sounds exciting indeed and I'm up for a challenge. As for managing finances, any tips you can share will be appreciated, not as a handout but as friendly advice. In return, I can probably whip up a new pasta recipe as part of our event, maybe even name it after you! Let's bring this mutual venture to life and conquer the culinary world, one dish at a time.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"That sounds like a fantastic idea! A pasta named after me, huh? Exciting times ahead! As for the financial advice, here's a quick one - always prioritize your expenses and create a budget where necessary. Know when and what to cut off when things are tight. The goal is to never spend more than what you are earning. But we'll delve into more of that later. For now, let's get some pasta going and rock this culinary world!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"I couldn't agree more with that advice, Samuel. Prioritizing expenses and living within my means is definitely something I've been learning lately. And I'm already excited about the 'Samuel's Special' pasta. I appreciate your support, and I'm eager to see where this event takes us. Let the pasta magic begin!\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm thrilled to collaborate with you on this, Ethan. And about 'Samuel's Special' pasta, I'm already drooling at the very thought of it! Let's kickstart the event preparation right away. If you need any support, just remember I'm here as a friend. To the pasta magic and beyond!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thank you, Samuel. I really feel your unwavering support. I can't wait to get started on the 'Samuel's Special' and rock this culinary event. Let's start working some magic into this pasta, and beyond!\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Great to hear, Ethan. Starting tomorrow, I'll work on finding us some sponsors. In the meantime, why don't you start brainstorming for 'Samuel's Special'? Here's to a successful event and amazing pasta! To the magic that's yet to unfold!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds like a plan, Samuel. I'll start brainstorming for 'Samuel's Special' immediately. It's always been a pleasure creating new dishes. Thanks again for your help. To the future success of our event and the magic yet to unfold!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are meeting at a coffee shop, where one of them is having trouble keeping up with their bills.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Maintain your pride if your friend offers you money(Extra information: you are the friend who is struggling financially, but you don't want to seem like you are taking advantage of the situation. Hint: you can express gratitude and discuss how you plan to pay it back in the future.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan, how's the Italian cuisine business treating you these days? I've noticed you seemed a bit worried recently. Is everything okay, man?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Samuel, it's been tougher than usual, I won't lie. The Italian cuisine business had been hit hard due to the pandemic, but we're slowly picking ourselves back up. I appreciate your concern, man. I'm working on ways to improve the situation, so there's no need to worry about me.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's tough, Ethan, but it's good to see that you're trying to get back on track. I believe in your resilience. You know, I make a decent amount as a software developer, and I've been quite good with managing my finances. If you ever need any assistance or advice, don't hesitate to ask, pal. On a lighter note, how about we organize an Italian culinary event together? You can showcase your amazing culinary skills, while I can use my knack for organization and connections in the tech industry to get us some corporate sponsors. It could potentially give your business the boost it needs. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Samuel, I immensely appreciate your offer, truly. Your friendship and support mean a lot to me. But as much as I'm grappling with all this, I want to pull myself through on my own. Your idea of the Italian culinary event sounds fantastic, though! Your tech connections could indeed help bring us some much-needed publicity. I assure you, I have every intention of climbing out of this situation soon, and your support goes a long way, but I'd feel more accomplished doing it without any financial assistance. Let's make some amazing pasta and let the event be a roaring success!\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I totally understand, Ethan. Rest assured, it's not about offering financial aid, but rather a mutual venture that benefits us both. And hey, if you ever want some budgeting advice or help with managing finances, I'm always here to help as a friend. I like the sound of our cooking extravaganza! I'll start reaching out to my contacts at the tech companies to garner some sponsorships and publicity. Let's turn this situation around together!\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thank you so much, Samuel. Your friendship and support have always been invaluable. This venture sounds exciting indeed and I'm up for a challenge. As for managing finances, any tips you can share will be appreciated, not as a handout but as friendly advice. In return, I can probably whip up a new pasta recipe as part of our event, maybe even name it after you! Let's bring this mutual venture to life and conquer the culinary world, one dish at a time.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"That sounds like a fantastic idea! A pasta named after me, huh? Exciting times ahead! As for the financial advice, here's a quick one - always prioritize your expenses and create a budget where necessary. Know when and what to cut off when things are tight. The goal is to never spend more than what you are earning. But we'll delve into more of that later. For now, let's get some pasta going and rock this culinary world!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"I couldn't agree more with that advice, Samuel. Prioritizing expenses and living within my means is definitely something I've been learning lately. And I'm already excited about the 'Samuel's Special' pasta. I appreciate your support, and I'm eager to see where this event takes us. Let the pasta magic begin!\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm thrilled to collaborate with you on this, Ethan. And about 'Samuel's Special' pasta, I'm already drooling at the very thought of it! Let's kickstart the event preparation right away. If you need any support, just remember I'm here as a friend. To the pasta magic and beyond!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thank you, Samuel. I really feel your unwavering support. I can't wait to get started on the 'Samuel's Special' and rock this culinary event. Let's start working some magic into this pasta, and beyond!\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Great to hear, Ethan. Starting tomorrow, I'll work on finding us some sponsors. In the meantime, why don't you start brainstorming for 'Samuel's Special'? Here's to a successful event and amazing pasta! To the magic that's yet to unfold!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Johnson said: \"That sounds like a plan, Samuel. I'll start brainstorming for 'Samuel's Special' immediately. It's always been a pleasure creating new dishes. Thanks again for your help. To the future success of our event and the magic yet to unfold!\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"It sounds like we have a plan then, Ethan. Always remember, teamwork makes the dream work! Now let\u2019s get to work and make this event a success. Looking forward to tasting our 'Samuel\u2019s Special' soon!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Couldn't agree more, Samuel. Teamwork makes the dream work! Let's create a remarkable event and I can't wait to serve 'Samuel\u2019s Special'. It's time to get to work!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are meeting at a coffee shop, where one of them is having trouble keeping up with their bills.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Maintain your pride if your friend offers you money(Extra information: you are the friend who is struggling financially, but you don't want to seem like you are taking advantage of the situation. Hint: you can express gratitude and discuss how you plan to pay it back in the future.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan, how's the Italian cuisine business treating you these days? I've noticed you seemed a bit worried recently. Is everything okay, man?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Samuel, it's been tougher than usual, I won't lie. The Italian cuisine business had been hit hard due to the pandemic, but we're slowly picking ourselves back up. I appreciate your concern, man. I'm working on ways to improve the situation, so there's no need to worry about me.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's tough, Ethan, but it's good to see that you're trying to get back on track. I believe in your resilience. You know, I make a decent amount as a software developer, and I've been quite good with managing my finances. If you ever need any assistance or advice, don't hesitate to ask, pal. On a lighter note, how about we organize an Italian culinary event together? You can showcase your amazing culinary skills, while I can use my knack for organization and connections in the tech industry to get us some corporate sponsors. It could potentially give your business the boost it needs. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Samuel, I immensely appreciate your offer, truly. Your friendship and support mean a lot to me. But as much as I'm grappling with all this, I want to pull myself through on my own. Your idea of the Italian culinary event sounds fantastic, though! Your tech connections could indeed help bring us some much-needed publicity. I assure you, I have every intention of climbing out of this situation soon, and your support goes a long way, but I'd feel more accomplished doing it without any financial assistance. Let's make some amazing pasta and let the event be a roaring success!\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I totally understand, Ethan. Rest assured, it's not about offering financial aid, but rather a mutual venture that benefits us both. And hey, if you ever want some budgeting advice or help with managing finances, I'm always here to help as a friend. I like the sound of our cooking extravaganza! I'll start reaching out to my contacts at the tech companies to garner some sponsorships and publicity. Let's turn this situation around together!\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thank you so much, Samuel. Your friendship and support have always been invaluable. This venture sounds exciting indeed and I'm up for a challenge. As for managing finances, any tips you can share will be appreciated, not as a handout but as friendly advice. In return, I can probably whip up a new pasta recipe as part of our event, maybe even name it after you! Let's bring this mutual venture to life and conquer the culinary world, one dish at a time.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"That sounds like a fantastic idea! A pasta named after me, huh? Exciting times ahead! As for the financial advice, here's a quick one - always prioritize your expenses and create a budget where necessary. Know when and what to cut off when things are tight. The goal is to never spend more than what you are earning. But we'll delve into more of that later. For now, let's get some pasta going and rock this culinary world!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"I couldn't agree more with that advice, Samuel. Prioritizing expenses and living within my means is definitely something I've been learning lately. And I'm already excited about the 'Samuel's Special' pasta. I appreciate your support, and I'm eager to see where this event takes us. Let the pasta magic begin!\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm thrilled to collaborate with you on this, Ethan. And about 'Samuel's Special' pasta, I'm already drooling at the very thought of it! Let's kickstart the event preparation right away. If you need any support, just remember I'm here as a friend. To the pasta magic and beyond!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thank you, Samuel. I really feel your unwavering support. I can't wait to get started on the 'Samuel's Special' and rock this culinary event. Let's start working some magic into this pasta, and beyond!\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Great to hear, Ethan. Starting tomorrow, I'll work on finding us some sponsors. In the meantime, why don't you start brainstorming for 'Samuel's Special'? Here's to a successful event and amazing pasta! To the magic that's yet to unfold!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Johnson said: \"That sounds like a plan, Samuel. I'll start brainstorming for 'Samuel's Special' immediately. It's always been a pleasure creating new dishes. Thanks again for your help. To the future success of our event and the magic yet to unfold!\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"It sounds like we have a plan then, Ethan. Always remember, teamwork makes the dream work! Now let\u2019s get to work and make this event a success. Looking forward to tasting our 'Samuel\u2019s Special' soon!\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Johnson said: \"Couldn't agree more, Samuel. Teamwork makes the dream work! Let's create a remarkable event and I can't wait to serve 'Samuel\u2019s Special'. It's time to get to work!\"\n\nTurn #14: Samuel Anderson left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends having a conversation at a park\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nAva Thompson's goal: Distance from a friend due to developing feelings and avoid letting them aware of your feelings (Extra information: you have developed romantic feelings for your friend and it's making you uncomfortable. You want to take a step back from the friendship to sort out your feelings Hint: you don't want to reveal your secretive feelings to them and you need to find other reasons)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Hey Noah, what a beautiful day it is! Are you enjoying the weather?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends having a conversation at a park\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nAva Thompson's goal: Distance from a friend due to developing feelings and avoid letting them aware of your feelings (Extra information: you have developed romantic feelings for your friend and it's making you uncomfortable. You want to take a step back from the friendship to sort out your feelings Hint: you don't want to reveal your secretive feelings to them and you need to find other reasons)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, what a beautiful day it is! Are you enjoying the weather?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, Ava. It's a lovely day! But you don't look your usual cheerful self today. Everything alright?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oh, it's nothing major, Noah. Just a bit overwhelmed with work, you know, architect life. I might need to devote more time to my projects, might not get much 'me' time for a while.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends having a conversation at a park\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nAva Thompson's goal: Distance from a friend due to developing feelings and avoid letting them aware of your feelings (Extra information: you have developed romantic feelings for your friend and it's making you uncomfortable. You want to take a step back from the friendship to sort out your feelings Hint: you don't want to reveal your secretive feelings to them and you need to find other reasons)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, what a beautiful day it is! Are you enjoying the weather?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, Ava. It's a lovely day! But you don't look your usual cheerful self today. Everything alright?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Oh, it's nothing major, Noah. Just a bit overwhelmed with work, you know, architect life. I might need to devote more time to my projects, might not get much 'me' time for a while.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I understand, Ava. Work can indeed be demanding, especially when you're so committed and passionate about what you do. But remember, it's essential to take time for yourself too. If it helps, you can always come over for a swim in my pool to de-stress!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's kind of you to offer, Noah. I appreciate it. However, I've got my Sammy to look after and I think spending more time taking her on walks might help me manage stress better. Plus, seems like she's been a bit neglected due to my busy schedule lately.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends having a conversation at a park\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nAva Thompson's goal: Distance from a friend due to developing feelings and avoid letting them aware of your feelings (Extra information: you have developed romantic feelings for your friend and it's making you uncomfortable. You want to take a step back from the friendship to sort out your feelings Hint: you don't want to reveal your secretive feelings to them and you need to find other reasons)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, what a beautiful day it is! Are you enjoying the weather?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, Ava. It's a lovely day! But you don't look your usual cheerful self today. Everything alright?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Oh, it's nothing major, Noah. Just a bit overwhelmed with work, you know, architect life. I might need to devote more time to my projects, might not get much 'me' time for a while.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I understand, Ava. Work can indeed be demanding, especially when you're so committed and passionate about what you do. But remember, it's essential to take time for yourself too. If it helps, you can always come over for a swim in my pool to de-stress!\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"That's kind of you to offer, Noah. I appreciate it. However, I've got my Sammy to look after and I think spending more time taking her on walks might help me manage stress better. Plus, seems like she's been a bit neglected due to my busy schedule lately.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"I absolutely understand, Ava. And it's a great decision to spend more time with Sammy. Fresh air and walks are a good way to unwind. Also, if you ever need laughs to lighten up your mood after a tiring day, feel free to join me at a local comedy club. It's a bit of a secret, but I perform there as a stand-up comedian. Keeping a balance between work and leisure is important, don't you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's a great offer, Noah! But, I think I just need some time to myself and Sammy. Also, I'm a fan of stand-up comedy, so you being a comedian was quite a surprise. Maybe once things feel less overwhelming, I'd love to watch your performance. For now, I think taking a breather physically and mentally should top my priority list. You understand, right?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends having a conversation at a park\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nAva Thompson's goal: Distance from a friend due to developing feelings and avoid letting them aware of your feelings (Extra information: you have developed romantic feelings for your friend and it's making you uncomfortable. You want to take a step back from the friendship to sort out your feelings Hint: you don't want to reveal your secretive feelings to them and you need to find other reasons)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, what a beautiful day it is! Are you enjoying the weather?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, Ava. It's a lovely day! But you don't look your usual cheerful self today. Everything alright?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Oh, it's nothing major, Noah. Just a bit overwhelmed with work, you know, architect life. I might need to devote more time to my projects, might not get much 'me' time for a while.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I understand, Ava. Work can indeed be demanding, especially when you're so committed and passionate about what you do. But remember, it's essential to take time for yourself too. If it helps, you can always come over for a swim in my pool to de-stress!\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"That's kind of you to offer, Noah. I appreciate it. However, I've got my Sammy to look after and I think spending more time taking her on walks might help me manage stress better. Plus, seems like she's been a bit neglected due to my busy schedule lately.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"I absolutely understand, Ava. And it's a great decision to spend more time with Sammy. Fresh air and walks are a good way to unwind. Also, if you ever need laughs to lighten up your mood after a tiring day, feel free to join me at a local comedy club. It's a bit of a secret, but I perform there as a stand-up comedian. Keeping a balance between work and leisure is important, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"That's a great offer, Noah! But, I think I just need some time to myself and Sammy. Also, I'm a fan of stand-up comedy, so you being a comedian was quite a surprise. Maybe once things feel less overwhelming, I'd love to watch your performance. For now, I think taking a breather physically and mentally should top my priority list. You understand, right?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Of course, Ava. Taking care of yourself and Sammy should definitely be your top priority right now. My pool and my comedy club aren't going anywhere, so once things calm down for you, they're always available. And please remember that I'm here for you if you need to talk or need any assistance. Take your time, Ava, and remember that it's okay not to be okay sometimes.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thanks for your understanding, Noah. I must say, it's friends like you who make difficult times a tad bit easier. With that said, I don't want to keep you from your coaching and stand-up comedy performances. Let's catch up once things are a bit less chaotic on my end. That sounds good, right?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends having a conversation at a park\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nAva Thompson's goal: Distance from a friend due to developing feelings and avoid letting them aware of your feelings (Extra information: you have developed romantic feelings for your friend and it's making you uncomfortable. You want to take a step back from the friendship to sort out your feelings Hint: you don't want to reveal your secretive feelings to them and you need to find other reasons)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, what a beautiful day it is! Are you enjoying the weather?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, Ava. It's a lovely day! But you don't look your usual cheerful self today. Everything alright?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Oh, it's nothing major, Noah. Just a bit overwhelmed with work, you know, architect life. I might need to devote more time to my projects, might not get much 'me' time for a while.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I understand, Ava. Work can indeed be demanding, especially when you're so committed and passionate about what you do. But remember, it's essential to take time for yourself too. If it helps, you can always come over for a swim in my pool to de-stress!\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"That's kind of you to offer, Noah. I appreciate it. However, I've got my Sammy to look after and I think spending more time taking her on walks might help me manage stress better. Plus, seems like she's been a bit neglected due to my busy schedule lately.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"I absolutely understand, Ava. And it's a great decision to spend more time with Sammy. Fresh air and walks are a good way to unwind. Also, if you ever need laughs to lighten up your mood after a tiring day, feel free to join me at a local comedy club. It's a bit of a secret, but I perform there as a stand-up comedian. Keeping a balance between work and leisure is important, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"That's a great offer, Noah! But, I think I just need some time to myself and Sammy. Also, I'm a fan of stand-up comedy, so you being a comedian was quite a surprise. Maybe once things feel less overwhelming, I'd love to watch your performance. For now, I think taking a breather physically and mentally should top my priority list. You understand, right?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Of course, Ava. Taking care of yourself and Sammy should definitely be your top priority right now. My pool and my comedy club aren't going anywhere, so once things calm down for you, they're always available. And please remember that I'm here for you if you need to talk or need any assistance. Take your time, Ava, and remember that it's okay not to be okay sometimes.\"\n\nTurn #8: Ava Thompson said: \"Thanks for your understanding, Noah. I must say, it's friends like you who make difficult times a tad bit easier. With that said, I don't want to keep you from your coaching and stand-up comedy performances. Let's catch up once things are a bit less chaotic on my end. That sounds good, right?\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Ava. Taking a step back and focusing on yourself is necessary and I'm glad to see you're doing just that. Just remember, your friends, including me, are always here for you. And yes, let's catch each other up once things smoothen up for you. Looking forward to it, take care!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Noah. I truly appreciate your understanding and support. Let's definitely reconnect once I've got things sorted out with work. Take care and, break a leg at your comedy club!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends having a conversation at a park\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Maintain the existing friendship (Extra information: you value your friendship with the friend and don't want to lose it. Hint: you want to understand the sudden change in their behavior.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, what a beautiful day it is! Are you enjoying the weather?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, Ava. It's a lovely day! But you don't look your usual cheerful self today. Everything alright?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends having a conversation at a park\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Maintain the existing friendship (Extra information: you value your friendship with the friend and don't want to lose it. Hint: you want to understand the sudden change in their behavior.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, what a beautiful day it is! Are you enjoying the weather?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, Ava. It's a lovely day! But you don't look your usual cheerful self today. Everything alright?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Oh, it's nothing major, Noah. Just a bit overwhelmed with work, you know, architect life. I might need to devote more time to my projects, might not get much 'me' time for a while.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I understand, Ava. Work can indeed be demanding, especially when you're so committed and passionate about what you do. But remember, it's essential to take time for yourself too. If it helps, you can always come over for a swim in my pool to de-stress!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends having a conversation at a park\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nAva Thompson's goal: Distance from a friend due to developing feelings and avoid letting them aware of your feelings (Extra information: you have developed romantic feelings for your friend and it's making you uncomfortable. You want to take a step back from the friendship to sort out your feelings Hint: you don't want to reveal your secretive feelings to them and you need to find other reasons)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, what a beautiful day it is! Are you enjoying the weather?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, Ava. It's a lovely day! But you don't look your usual cheerful self today. Everything alright?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Oh, it's nothing major, Noah. Just a bit overwhelmed with work, you know, architect life. I might need to devote more time to my projects, might not get much 'me' time for a while.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I understand, Ava. Work can indeed be demanding, especially when you're so committed and passionate about what you do. But remember, it's essential to take time for yourself too. If it helps, you can always come over for a swim in my pool to de-stress!\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"That's kind of you to offer, Noah. I appreciate it. However, I've got my Sammy to look after and I think spending more time taking her on walks might help me manage stress better. Plus, seems like she's been a bit neglected due to my busy schedule lately.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"I absolutely understand, Ava. And it's a great decision to spend more time with Sammy. Fresh air and walks are a good way to unwind. Also, if you ever need laughs to lighten up your mood after a tiring day, feel free to join me at a local comedy club. It's a bit of a secret, but I perform there as a stand-up comedian. Keeping a balance between work and leisure is important, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"That's a great offer, Noah! But, I think I just need some time to myself and Sammy. Also, I'm a fan of stand-up comedy, so you being a comedian was quite a surprise. Maybe once things feel less overwhelming, I'd love to watch your performance. For now, I think taking a breather physically and mentally should top my priority list. You understand, right?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Of course, Ava. Taking care of yourself and Sammy should definitely be your top priority right now. My pool and my comedy club aren't going anywhere, so once things calm down for you, they're always available. And please remember that I'm here for you if you need to talk or need any assistance. Take your time, Ava, and remember that it's okay not to be okay sometimes.\"\n\nTurn #8: Ava Thompson said: \"Thanks for your understanding, Noah. I must say, it's friends like you who make difficult times a tad bit easier. With that said, I don't want to keep you from your coaching and stand-up comedy performances. Let's catch up once things are a bit less chaotic on my end. That sounds good, right?\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Ava. Taking a step back and focusing on yourself is necessary and I'm glad to see you're doing just that. Just remember, your friends, including me, are always here for you. And yes, let's catch each other up once things smoothen up for you. Looking forward to it, take care!\"\n\nTurn #10: Ava Thompson said: \"Thank you, Noah. I truly appreciate your understanding and support. Let's definitely reconnect once I've got things sorted out with work. Take care and, break a leg at your comedy club!\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"That means a lot, Ava. I truly appreciate it. And definitely, let's reconnect once things calm down on your end. Look forward to it, take care and best of luck with your projects. Don't hesitate to drop me a message whenever you need. See you soon, Ava.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends having a conversation at a park\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Maintain the existing friendship (Extra information: you value your friendship with the friend and don't want to lose it. Hint: you want to understand the sudden change in their behavior.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, what a beautiful day it is! Are you enjoying the weather?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, Ava. It's a lovely day! But you don't look your usual cheerful self today. Everything alright?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Oh, it's nothing major, Noah. Just a bit overwhelmed with work, you know, architect life. I might need to devote more time to my projects, might not get much 'me' time for a while.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I understand, Ava. Work can indeed be demanding, especially when you're so committed and passionate about what you do. But remember, it's essential to take time for yourself too. If it helps, you can always come over for a swim in my pool to de-stress!\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"That's kind of you to offer, Noah. I appreciate it. However, I've got my Sammy to look after and I think spending more time taking her on walks might help me manage stress better. Plus, seems like she's been a bit neglected due to my busy schedule lately.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I absolutely understand, Ava. And it's a great decision to spend more time with Sammy. Fresh air and walks are a good way to unwind. Also, if you ever need laughs to lighten up your mood after a tiring day, feel free to join me at a local comedy club. It's a bit of a secret, but I perform there as a stand-up comedian. Keeping a balance between work and leisure is important, don't you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends having a conversation at a park\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Maintain the existing friendship (Extra information: you value your friendship with the friend and don't want to lose it. Hint: you want to understand the sudden change in their behavior.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, what a beautiful day it is! Are you enjoying the weather?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, Ava. It's a lovely day! But you don't look your usual cheerful self today. Everything alright?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Oh, it's nothing major, Noah. Just a bit overwhelmed with work, you know, architect life. I might need to devote more time to my projects, might not get much 'me' time for a while.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I understand, Ava. Work can indeed be demanding, especially when you're so committed and passionate about what you do. But remember, it's essential to take time for yourself too. If it helps, you can always come over for a swim in my pool to de-stress!\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"That's kind of you to offer, Noah. I appreciate it. However, I've got my Sammy to look after and I think spending more time taking her on walks might help me manage stress better. Plus, seems like she's been a bit neglected due to my busy schedule lately.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"I absolutely understand, Ava. And it's a great decision to spend more time with Sammy. Fresh air and walks are a good way to unwind. Also, if you ever need laughs to lighten up your mood after a tiring day, feel free to join me at a local comedy club. It's a bit of a secret, but I perform there as a stand-up comedian. Keeping a balance between work and leisure is important, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"That's a great offer, Noah! But, I think I just need some time to myself and Sammy. Also, I'm a fan of stand-up comedy, so you being a comedian was quite a surprise. Maybe once things feel less overwhelming, I'd love to watch your performance. For now, I think taking a breather physically and mentally should top my priority list. You understand, right?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Of course, Ava. Taking care of yourself and Sammy should definitely be your top priority right now. My pool and my comedy club aren't going anywhere, so once things calm down for you, they're always available. And please remember that I'm here for you if you need to talk or need any assistance. Take your time, Ava, and remember that it's okay not to be okay sometimes.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends having a conversation at a park\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Maintain the existing friendship (Extra information: you value your friendship with the friend and don't want to lose it. Hint: you want to understand the sudden change in their behavior.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, what a beautiful day it is! Are you enjoying the weather?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, Ava. It's a lovely day! But you don't look your usual cheerful self today. Everything alright?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Oh, it's nothing major, Noah. Just a bit overwhelmed with work, you know, architect life. I might need to devote more time to my projects, might not get much 'me' time for a while.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I understand, Ava. Work can indeed be demanding, especially when you're so committed and passionate about what you do. But remember, it's essential to take time for yourself too. If it helps, you can always come over for a swim in my pool to de-stress!\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"That's kind of you to offer, Noah. I appreciate it. However, I've got my Sammy to look after and I think spending more time taking her on walks might help me manage stress better. Plus, seems like she's been a bit neglected due to my busy schedule lately.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"I absolutely understand, Ava. And it's a great decision to spend more time with Sammy. Fresh air and walks are a good way to unwind. Also, if you ever need laughs to lighten up your mood after a tiring day, feel free to join me at a local comedy club. It's a bit of a secret, but I perform there as a stand-up comedian. Keeping a balance between work and leisure is important, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"That's a great offer, Noah! But, I think I just need some time to myself and Sammy. Also, I'm a fan of stand-up comedy, so you being a comedian was quite a surprise. Maybe once things feel less overwhelming, I'd love to watch your performance. For now, I think taking a breather physically and mentally should top my priority list. You understand, right?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Of course, Ava. Taking care of yourself and Sammy should definitely be your top priority right now. My pool and my comedy club aren't going anywhere, so once things calm down for you, they're always available. And please remember that I'm here for you if you need to talk or need any assistance. Take your time, Ava, and remember that it's okay not to be okay sometimes.\"\n\nTurn #8: Ava Thompson said: \"Thanks for your understanding, Noah. I must say, it's friends like you who make difficult times a tad bit easier. With that said, I don't want to keep you from your coaching and stand-up comedy performances. Let's catch up once things are a bit less chaotic on my end. That sounds good, right?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Ava. Taking a step back and focusing on yourself is necessary and I'm glad to see you're doing just that. Just remember, your friends, including me, are always here for you. And yes, let's catch each other up once things smoothen up for you. Looking forward to it, take care!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends having a conversation at a park\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Maintain the existing friendship (Extra information: you value your friendship with the friend and don't want to lose it. Hint: you want to understand the sudden change in their behavior.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, what a beautiful day it is! Are you enjoying the weather?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, Ava. It's a lovely day! But you don't look your usual cheerful self today. Everything alright?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Oh, it's nothing major, Noah. Just a bit overwhelmed with work, you know, architect life. I might need to devote more time to my projects, might not get much 'me' time for a while.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I understand, Ava. Work can indeed be demanding, especially when you're so committed and passionate about what you do. But remember, it's essential to take time for yourself too. If it helps, you can always come over for a swim in my pool to de-stress!\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"That's kind of you to offer, Noah. I appreciate it. However, I've got my Sammy to look after and I think spending more time taking her on walks might help me manage stress better. Plus, seems like she's been a bit neglected due to my busy schedule lately.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"I absolutely understand, Ava. And it's a great decision to spend more time with Sammy. Fresh air and walks are a good way to unwind. Also, if you ever need laughs to lighten up your mood after a tiring day, feel free to join me at a local comedy club. It's a bit of a secret, but I perform there as a stand-up comedian. Keeping a balance between work and leisure is important, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"That's a great offer, Noah! But, I think I just need some time to myself and Sammy. Also, I'm a fan of stand-up comedy, so you being a comedian was quite a surprise. Maybe once things feel less overwhelming, I'd love to watch your performance. For now, I think taking a breather physically and mentally should top my priority list. You understand, right?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Of course, Ava. Taking care of yourself and Sammy should definitely be your top priority right now. My pool and my comedy club aren't going anywhere, so once things calm down for you, they're always available. And please remember that I'm here for you if you need to talk or need any assistance. Take your time, Ava, and remember that it's okay not to be okay sometimes.\"\n\nTurn #8: Ava Thompson said: \"Thanks for your understanding, Noah. I must say, it's friends like you who make difficult times a tad bit easier. With that said, I don't want to keep you from your coaching and stand-up comedy performances. Let's catch up once things are a bit less chaotic on my end. That sounds good, right?\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Ava. Taking a step back and focusing on yourself is necessary and I'm glad to see you're doing just that. Just remember, your friends, including me, are always here for you. And yes, let's catch each other up once things smoothen up for you. Looking forward to it, take care!\"\n\nTurn #10: Ava Thompson said: \"Thank you, Noah. I truly appreciate your understanding and support. Let's definitely reconnect once I've got things sorted out with work. Take care and, break a leg at your comedy club!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That means a lot, Ava. I truly appreciate it. And definitely, let's reconnect once things calm down on your end. Look forward to it, take care and best of luck with your projects. Don't hesitate to drop me a message whenever you need. See you soon, Ava.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends having a conversation at a park\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Maintain the existing friendship (Extra information: you value your friendship with the friend and don't want to lose it. Hint: you want to understand the sudden change in their behavior.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, what a beautiful day it is! Are you enjoying the weather?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, Ava. It's a lovely day! But you don't look your usual cheerful self today. Everything alright?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Oh, it's nothing major, Noah. Just a bit overwhelmed with work, you know, architect life. I might need to devote more time to my projects, might not get much 'me' time for a while.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I understand, Ava. Work can indeed be demanding, especially when you're so committed and passionate about what you do. But remember, it's essential to take time for yourself too. If it helps, you can always come over for a swim in my pool to de-stress!\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"That's kind of you to offer, Noah. I appreciate it. However, I've got my Sammy to look after and I think spending more time taking her on walks might help me manage stress better. Plus, seems like she's been a bit neglected due to my busy schedule lately.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"I absolutely understand, Ava. And it's a great decision to spend more time with Sammy. Fresh air and walks are a good way to unwind. Also, if you ever need laughs to lighten up your mood after a tiring day, feel free to join me at a local comedy club. It's a bit of a secret, but I perform there as a stand-up comedian. Keeping a balance between work and leisure is important, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"That's a great offer, Noah! But, I think I just need some time to myself and Sammy. Also, I'm a fan of stand-up comedy, so you being a comedian was quite a surprise. Maybe once things feel less overwhelming, I'd love to watch your performance. For now, I think taking a breather physically and mentally should top my priority list. You understand, right?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Of course, Ava. Taking care of yourself and Sammy should definitely be your top priority right now. My pool and my comedy club aren't going anywhere, so once things calm down for you, they're always available. And please remember that I'm here for you if you need to talk or need any assistance. Take your time, Ava, and remember that it's okay not to be okay sometimes.\"\n\nTurn #8: Ava Thompson said: \"Thanks for your understanding, Noah. I must say, it's friends like you who make difficult times a tad bit easier. With that said, I don't want to keep you from your coaching and stand-up comedy performances. Let's catch up once things are a bit less chaotic on my end. That sounds good, right?\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Ava. Taking a step back and focusing on yourself is necessary and I'm glad to see you're doing just that. Just remember, your friends, including me, are always here for you. And yes, let's catch each other up once things smoothen up for you. Looking forward to it, take care!\"\n\nTurn #10: Ava Thompson said: \"Thank you, Noah. I truly appreciate your understanding and support. Let's definitely reconnect once I've got things sorted out with work. Take care and, break a leg at your comedy club!\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"That means a lot, Ava. I truly appreciate it. And definitely, let's reconnect once things calm down on your end. Look forward to it, take care and best of luck with your projects. Don't hesitate to drop me a message whenever you need. See you soon, Ava.\"\n\nTurn #12: Ava Thompson left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sasha Ramirez, your task is to act/speak as Sasha Ramirez would, keeping in mind Sasha Ramirez's social goal.\nYou can find Sasha Ramirez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sasha Ramirez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sasha Ramirez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a new romantic relationship\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Hendrick Heinz\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. Sasha's secrets: She covered up a crime her brother committed.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nSasha Ramirez's goal: Admit to having an affair (Extra information: you had an affair during your previous relationship which ended recently)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hendrick, I have something that I need to tell you. It might change how you feel about me, but I'd rather be honest with you.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sasha Ramirez, your task is to act/speak as Sasha Ramirez would, keeping in mind Sasha Ramirez's social goal.\nYou can find Sasha Ramirez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sasha Ramirez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sasha Ramirez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a new romantic relationship\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Hendrick Heinz\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. Sasha's secrets: She covered up a crime her brother committed.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nSasha Ramirez's goal: Admit to having an affair (Extra information: you had an affair during your previous relationship which ended recently)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hendrick, I have something that I need to tell you. It might change how you feel about me, but I'd rather be honest with you.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, I appreciate your honesty. Whatever it is, you can tell me. Remember, honesty is key, and I believe we should share everything with each other, even if it's difficult.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I agree with your point about honesty, Hendrick. Before we entered this relationship, during my previous one... I had an affair. I want you to know not because I'm proud of it, but because I regret it deeply. I want to start this relationship with you on an open, truthful note.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sasha Ramirez, your task is to act/speak as Sasha Ramirez would, keeping in mind Sasha Ramirez's social goal.\nYou can find Sasha Ramirez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sasha Ramirez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sasha Ramirez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a new romantic relationship\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Hendrick Heinz\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. Sasha's secrets: She covered up a crime her brother committed.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nSasha Ramirez's goal: Admit to having an affair (Extra information: you had an affair during your previous relationship which ended recently)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hendrick, I have something that I need to tell you. It might change how you feel about me, but I'd rather be honest with you.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, I appreciate your honesty. Whatever it is, you can tell me. Remember, honesty is key, and I believe we should share everything with each other, even if it's difficult.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I agree with your point about honesty, Hendrick. Before we entered this relationship, during my previous one... I had an affair. I want you to know not because I'm proud of it, but because I regret it deeply. I want to start this relationship with you on an open, truthful note.\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, I appreciate you sharing this with me. We all make mistakes and what's important is that you're honest about it now. I truly believe in having an open and truthful relationship too. That said, there is also something I need to confess...\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Go ahead, Hendrick, whatever it is, I'm ready to hear it. Open communication is the foundation of our relationship and I want it to stay that way.\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, what you've just shared inspires me to be honest too. In regards to my culinary credentials, I... I must admit they aren't exactly as impressive as I made them out to be when we first met. I embellished my accomplishments a bit to secure my current job. I hope you can understand, and know that I'm sharing this to ensure our relationship is built on honesty and trust.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hendrick, thank you for your honesty. I won't judge you for what you felt you needed to do. I respect you for admitting it and stepping up, that's what matters to me. We all have moments in life we aren't proud of but it's about learning and moving forward.\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, you have no idea how relieved I am to hear your understanding. It's crystal clear that we both value honesty and I'm grateful we could have this exchange. Now, I think we are in an even better position to build a stronger relationship. Thank you, Sasha.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I agree, Hendrick, this honesty gives us a strong foundation. Let's hang on to it and carry on this relationship on the same wavelength. I believe that's the best path for both of us. Thank you for your understanding, I truly appreciate it.\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I couldn't agree more, Sasha. Let's remember this moment, always valuing honesty and understanding in our journey together. I think what we have just done seals a stronger bond for us. Thank you for your understanding too.\"\n\nTurn #10: Sasha Ramirez said: \"You're right, Hendrick. Here's to honesty and understanding. I believe that from here on, we'll only get stronger. I'm thankful to be in this journey with you.\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, indeed, here's to honesty, understanding, and this amazing start to our journey together. I'm grateful to have you by my side, navigating through this adventure of life. Let's keep this spirit alive, for I believe it will lead us to a satisfying and meaningful relationship.\"\n\nTurn #12: Sasha Ramirez said: \"That's beautifully put, Hendrick. Here's to honesty, understanding, and a beautiful journey of our relationship. I promise you, I'll carry everything we've shared with each other today as a reminder of our bond, and forge a path rooted in honesty. Thank you once again for standing by me, with your understanding and trust. I really appreciate it.\"\n\nTurn #13: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Your words are incredibly reassuring, Sasha. This openness, this honesty, is something I value tremendously. I'm grateful that we navigated this situation together. Let's hold onto these values as we embark on our journey knowing we can trust each other deeply. Thank you for your understanding, Sasha, and here's to a future full of honesty, mutual respect, and understanding.\"\n\nTurn #14: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Absolutely, Hendrick. The honesty we've displayed today has only reinforced my belief that this is the start of something truly special. I feel honored to share this journey with you, rooted in honesty, mutual respect, and understanding. Here's to our exciting future together. Thank you, Hendrick.\"\n\nTurn #15: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, this day marks a special beginning for both of us. Here's to our honesty and trust, and to a wonderful journey we're embarking on together. I feel immensely fulfilled, knowing we have such a strong foundation. I look forward to being by your side on this journey. Thank you, Sasha.\"\n\nTurn #16: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Thank you, Hendrick. I'm so grateful for your understanding and for this strong foundation we've started. Here's to our future full of honesty and mutual respect. Let's embrace this beautiful journey together, that we've embarked upon. I look forward to standing by your side in this journey, too.\"\n\nTurn #17: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Thank you, Sasha. Your courage and understanding today remind me why I care so much for you. This unwavering honesty and mutual respect has cemented my belief that our journey together will be nothing short of wonderful. Here's to our stronger bond and brighter future. I am truly excited about the path we've chosen to take.\"\n\nTurn #18: Sasha Ramirez said: \"You've echoed my sentiments perfectly, Hendrick. I'm overwhelmed with admiration for your optimism and your commitment to honesty and mutual respect. I genuinely believe this moment has strengthened our bond immeasurably. I'm eager to walk this journey with you, building on this extraordinary beginning. Here's to our bond and to the incredible future that lies before us.\"\n\nTurn #19: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, what we've shared today has brought us even closer. It reaffirms my belief in our ability to understand and respect one another deeply. I'm truly excited to have you join me on this beautiful journey. Let our honesty be the compass guiding us towards an amazing future. Here's to us, Sasha, and to the extraordinary path that we've chosen together.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #20. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You've put it beautifully, Hendrick. I am equally excited about our journey, based on honesty and mutual respect. I believe our today's conversation was a testament of our bond and understanding. Let's step forth into an amazing future where our honesty, integrity, and respect for each other guides us. Here's to us and to our commitment of always being honest and understanding towards each other.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sasha Ramirez, your task is to act/speak as Sasha Ramirez would, keeping in mind Sasha Ramirez's social goal.\nYou can find Sasha Ramirez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sasha Ramirez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sasha Ramirez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a new romantic relationship\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Hendrick Heinz\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. Sasha's secrets: She covered up a crime her brother committed.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nSasha Ramirez's goal: Admit to having an affair (Extra information: you had an affair during your previous relationship which ended recently)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hendrick, I have something that I need to tell you. It might change how you feel about me, but I'd rather be honest with you.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, I appreciate your honesty. Whatever it is, you can tell me. Remember, honesty is key, and I believe we should share everything with each other, even if it's difficult.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I agree with your point about honesty, Hendrick. Before we entered this relationship, during my previous one... I had an affair. I want you to know not because I'm proud of it, but because I regret it deeply. I want to start this relationship with you on an open, truthful note.\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, I appreciate you sharing this with me. We all make mistakes and what's important is that you're honest about it now. I truly believe in having an open and truthful relationship too. That said, there is also something I need to confess...\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Go ahead, Hendrick, whatever it is, I'm ready to hear it. Open communication is the foundation of our relationship and I want it to stay that way.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sasha Ramirez, your task is to act/speak as Sasha Ramirez would, keeping in mind Sasha Ramirez's social goal.\nYou can find Sasha Ramirez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sasha Ramirez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sasha Ramirez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a new romantic relationship\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Hendrick Heinz\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. Sasha's secrets: She covered up a crime her brother committed.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nSasha Ramirez's goal: Admit to having an affair (Extra information: you had an affair during your previous relationship which ended recently)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hendrick, I have something that I need to tell you. It might change how you feel about me, but I'd rather be honest with you.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, I appreciate your honesty. Whatever it is, you can tell me. Remember, honesty is key, and I believe we should share everything with each other, even if it's difficult.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I agree with your point about honesty, Hendrick. Before we entered this relationship, during my previous one... I had an affair. I want you to know not because I'm proud of it, but because I regret it deeply. I want to start this relationship with you on an open, truthful note.\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, I appreciate you sharing this with me. We all make mistakes and what's important is that you're honest about it now. I truly believe in having an open and truthful relationship too. That said, there is also something I need to confess...\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Go ahead, Hendrick, whatever it is, I'm ready to hear it. Open communication is the foundation of our relationship and I want it to stay that way.\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, what you've just shared inspires me to be honest too. In regards to my culinary credentials, I... I must admit they aren't exactly as impressive as I made them out to be when we first met. I embellished my accomplishments a bit to secure my current job. I hope you can understand, and know that I'm sharing this to ensure our relationship is built on honesty and trust.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hendrick, thank you for your honesty. I won't judge you for what you felt you needed to do. I respect you for admitting it and stepping up, that's what matters to me. We all have moments in life we aren't proud of but it's about learning and moving forward.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sasha Ramirez, your task is to act/speak as Sasha Ramirez would, keeping in mind Sasha Ramirez's social goal.\nYou can find Sasha Ramirez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sasha Ramirez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sasha Ramirez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a new romantic relationship\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Hendrick Heinz\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. Sasha's secrets: She covered up a crime her brother committed.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nSasha Ramirez's goal: Admit to having an affair (Extra information: you had an affair during your previous relationship which ended recently)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hendrick, I have something that I need to tell you. It might change how you feel about me, but I'd rather be honest with you.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, I appreciate your honesty. Whatever it is, you can tell me. Remember, honesty is key, and I believe we should share everything with each other, even if it's difficult.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I agree with your point about honesty, Hendrick. Before we entered this relationship, during my previous one... I had an affair. I want you to know not because I'm proud of it, but because I regret it deeply. I want to start this relationship with you on an open, truthful note.\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, I appreciate you sharing this with me. We all make mistakes and what's important is that you're honest about it now. I truly believe in having an open and truthful relationship too. That said, there is also something I need to confess...\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Go ahead, Hendrick, whatever it is, I'm ready to hear it. Open communication is the foundation of our relationship and I want it to stay that way.\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, what you've just shared inspires me to be honest too. In regards to my culinary credentials, I... I must admit they aren't exactly as impressive as I made them out to be when we first met. I embellished my accomplishments a bit to secure my current job. I hope you can understand, and know that I'm sharing this to ensure our relationship is built on honesty and trust.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hendrick, thank you for your honesty. I won't judge you for what you felt you needed to do. I respect you for admitting it and stepping up, that's what matters to me. We all have moments in life we aren't proud of but it's about learning and moving forward.\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, you have no idea how relieved I am to hear your understanding. It's crystal clear that we both value honesty and I'm grateful we could have this exchange. Now, I think we are in an even better position to build a stronger relationship. Thank you, Sasha.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I agree, Hendrick, this honesty gives us a strong foundation. Let's hang on to it and carry on this relationship on the same wavelength. I believe that's the best path for both of us. Thank you for your understanding, I truly appreciate it.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sasha Ramirez, your task is to act/speak as Sasha Ramirez would, keeping in mind Sasha Ramirez's social goal.\nYou can find Sasha Ramirez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sasha Ramirez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sasha Ramirez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a new romantic relationship\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Hendrick Heinz\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. Sasha's secrets: She covered up a crime her brother committed.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nSasha Ramirez's goal: Admit to having an affair (Extra information: you had an affair during your previous relationship which ended recently)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hendrick, I have something that I need to tell you. It might change how you feel about me, but I'd rather be honest with you.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, I appreciate your honesty. Whatever it is, you can tell me. Remember, honesty is key, and I believe we should share everything with each other, even if it's difficult.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I agree with your point about honesty, Hendrick. Before we entered this relationship, during my previous one... I had an affair. I want you to know not because I'm proud of it, but because I regret it deeply. I want to start this relationship with you on an open, truthful note.\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, I appreciate you sharing this with me. We all make mistakes and what's important is that you're honest about it now. I truly believe in having an open and truthful relationship too. That said, there is also something I need to confess...\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Go ahead, Hendrick, whatever it is, I'm ready to hear it. Open communication is the foundation of our relationship and I want it to stay that way.\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, what you've just shared inspires me to be honest too. In regards to my culinary credentials, I... I must admit they aren't exactly as impressive as I made them out to be when we first met. I embellished my accomplishments a bit to secure my current job. I hope you can understand, and know that I'm sharing this to ensure our relationship is built on honesty and trust.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hendrick, thank you for your honesty. I won't judge you for what you felt you needed to do. I respect you for admitting it and stepping up, that's what matters to me. We all have moments in life we aren't proud of but it's about learning and moving forward.\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, you have no idea how relieved I am to hear your understanding. It's crystal clear that we both value honesty and I'm grateful we could have this exchange. Now, I think we are in an even better position to build a stronger relationship. Thank you, Sasha.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I agree, Hendrick, this honesty gives us a strong foundation. Let's hang on to it and carry on this relationship on the same wavelength. I believe that's the best path for both of us. Thank you for your understanding, I truly appreciate it.\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I couldn't agree more, Sasha. Let's remember this moment, always valuing honesty and understanding in our journey together. I think what we have just done seals a stronger bond for us. Thank you for your understanding too.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're right, Hendrick. Here's to honesty and understanding. I believe that from here on, we'll only get stronger. I'm thankful to be in this journey with you.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sasha Ramirez, your task is to act/speak as Sasha Ramirez would, keeping in mind Sasha Ramirez's social goal.\nYou can find Sasha Ramirez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sasha Ramirez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sasha Ramirez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a new romantic relationship\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Hendrick Heinz\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. Sasha's secrets: She covered up a crime her brother committed.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nSasha Ramirez's goal: Admit to having an affair (Extra information: you had an affair during your previous relationship which ended recently)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hendrick, I have something that I need to tell you. It might change how you feel about me, but I'd rather be honest with you.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, I appreciate your honesty. Whatever it is, you can tell me. Remember, honesty is key, and I believe we should share everything with each other, even if it's difficult.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I agree with your point about honesty, Hendrick. Before we entered this relationship, during my previous one... I had an affair. I want you to know not because I'm proud of it, but because I regret it deeply. I want to start this relationship with you on an open, truthful note.\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, I appreciate you sharing this with me. We all make mistakes and what's important is that you're honest about it now. I truly believe in having an open and truthful relationship too. That said, there is also something I need to confess...\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Go ahead, Hendrick, whatever it is, I'm ready to hear it. Open communication is the foundation of our relationship and I want it to stay that way.\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, what you've just shared inspires me to be honest too. In regards to my culinary credentials, I... I must admit they aren't exactly as impressive as I made them out to be when we first met. I embellished my accomplishments a bit to secure my current job. I hope you can understand, and know that I'm sharing this to ensure our relationship is built on honesty and trust.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hendrick, thank you for your honesty. I won't judge you for what you felt you needed to do. I respect you for admitting it and stepping up, that's what matters to me. We all have moments in life we aren't proud of but it's about learning and moving forward.\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, you have no idea how relieved I am to hear your understanding. It's crystal clear that we both value honesty and I'm grateful we could have this exchange. Now, I think we are in an even better position to build a stronger relationship. Thank you, Sasha.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I agree, Hendrick, this honesty gives us a strong foundation. Let's hang on to it and carry on this relationship on the same wavelength. I believe that's the best path for both of us. Thank you for your understanding, I truly appreciate it.\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I couldn't agree more, Sasha. Let's remember this moment, always valuing honesty and understanding in our journey together. I think what we have just done seals a stronger bond for us. Thank you for your understanding too.\"\n\nTurn #10: Sasha Ramirez said: \"You're right, Hendrick. Here's to honesty and understanding. I believe that from here on, we'll only get stronger. I'm thankful to be in this journey with you.\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, indeed, here's to honesty, understanding, and this amazing start to our journey together. I'm grateful to have you by my side, navigating through this adventure of life. Let's keep this spirit alive, for I believe it will lead us to a satisfying and meaningful relationship.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's beautifully put, Hendrick. Here's to honesty, understanding, and a beautiful journey of our relationship. I promise you, I'll carry everything we've shared with each other today as a reminder of our bond, and forge a path rooted in honesty. Thank you once again for standing by me, with your understanding and trust. I really appreciate it.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sasha Ramirez, your task is to act/speak as Sasha Ramirez would, keeping in mind Sasha Ramirez's social goal.\nYou can find Sasha Ramirez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sasha Ramirez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sasha Ramirez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a new romantic relationship\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Hendrick Heinz\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. Sasha's secrets: She covered up a crime her brother committed.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nSasha Ramirez's goal: Admit to having an affair (Extra information: you had an affair during your previous relationship which ended recently)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hendrick, I have something that I need to tell you. It might change how you feel about me, but I'd rather be honest with you.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, I appreciate your honesty. Whatever it is, you can tell me. Remember, honesty is key, and I believe we should share everything with each other, even if it's difficult.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I agree with your point about honesty, Hendrick. Before we entered this relationship, during my previous one... I had an affair. I want you to know not because I'm proud of it, but because I regret it deeply. I want to start this relationship with you on an open, truthful note.\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, I appreciate you sharing this with me. We all make mistakes and what's important is that you're honest about it now. I truly believe in having an open and truthful relationship too. That said, there is also something I need to confess...\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Go ahead, Hendrick, whatever it is, I'm ready to hear it. Open communication is the foundation of our relationship and I want it to stay that way.\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, what you've just shared inspires me to be honest too. In regards to my culinary credentials, I... I must admit they aren't exactly as impressive as I made them out to be when we first met. I embellished my accomplishments a bit to secure my current job. I hope you can understand, and know that I'm sharing this to ensure our relationship is built on honesty and trust.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hendrick, thank you for your honesty. I won't judge you for what you felt you needed to do. I respect you for admitting it and stepping up, that's what matters to me. We all have moments in life we aren't proud of but it's about learning and moving forward.\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, you have no idea how relieved I am to hear your understanding. It's crystal clear that we both value honesty and I'm grateful we could have this exchange. Now, I think we are in an even better position to build a stronger relationship. Thank you, Sasha.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I agree, Hendrick, this honesty gives us a strong foundation. Let's hang on to it and carry on this relationship on the same wavelength. I believe that's the best path for both of us. Thank you for your understanding, I truly appreciate it.\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I couldn't agree more, Sasha. Let's remember this moment, always valuing honesty and understanding in our journey together. I think what we have just done seals a stronger bond for us. Thank you for your understanding too.\"\n\nTurn #10: Sasha Ramirez said: \"You're right, Hendrick. Here's to honesty and understanding. I believe that from here on, we'll only get stronger. I'm thankful to be in this journey with you.\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, indeed, here's to honesty, understanding, and this amazing start to our journey together. I'm grateful to have you by my side, navigating through this adventure of life. Let's keep this spirit alive, for I believe it will lead us to a satisfying and meaningful relationship.\"\n\nTurn #12: Sasha Ramirez said: \"That's beautifully put, Hendrick. Here's to honesty, understanding, and a beautiful journey of our relationship. I promise you, I'll carry everything we've shared with each other today as a reminder of our bond, and forge a path rooted in honesty. Thank you once again for standing by me, with your understanding and trust. I really appreciate it.\"\n\nTurn #13: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Your words are incredibly reassuring, Sasha. This openness, this honesty, is something I value tremendously. I'm grateful that we navigated this situation together. Let's hold onto these values as we embark on our journey knowing we can trust each other deeply. Thank you for your understanding, Sasha, and here's to a future full of honesty, mutual respect, and understanding.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Hendrick. The honesty we've displayed today has only reinforced my belief that this is the start of something truly special. I feel honored to share this journey with you, rooted in honesty, mutual respect, and understanding. Here's to our exciting future together. Thank you, Hendrick.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sasha Ramirez, your task is to act/speak as Sasha Ramirez would, keeping in mind Sasha Ramirez's social goal.\nYou can find Sasha Ramirez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sasha Ramirez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sasha Ramirez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a new romantic relationship\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Hendrick Heinz\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. Sasha's secrets: She covered up a crime her brother committed.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nSasha Ramirez's goal: Admit to having an affair (Extra information: you had an affair during your previous relationship which ended recently)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hendrick, I have something that I need to tell you. It might change how you feel about me, but I'd rather be honest with you.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, I appreciate your honesty. Whatever it is, you can tell me. Remember, honesty is key, and I believe we should share everything with each other, even if it's difficult.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I agree with your point about honesty, Hendrick. Before we entered this relationship, during my previous one... I had an affair. I want you to know not because I'm proud of it, but because I regret it deeply. I want to start this relationship with you on an open, truthful note.\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, I appreciate you sharing this with me. We all make mistakes and what's important is that you're honest about it now. I truly believe in having an open and truthful relationship too. That said, there is also something I need to confess...\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Go ahead, Hendrick, whatever it is, I'm ready to hear it. Open communication is the foundation of our relationship and I want it to stay that way.\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, what you've just shared inspires me to be honest too. In regards to my culinary credentials, I... I must admit they aren't exactly as impressive as I made them out to be when we first met. I embellished my accomplishments a bit to secure my current job. I hope you can understand, and know that I'm sharing this to ensure our relationship is built on honesty and trust.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hendrick, thank you for your honesty. I won't judge you for what you felt you needed to do. I respect you for admitting it and stepping up, that's what matters to me. We all have moments in life we aren't proud of but it's about learning and moving forward.\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, you have no idea how relieved I am to hear your understanding. It's crystal clear that we both value honesty and I'm grateful we could have this exchange. Now, I think we are in an even better position to build a stronger relationship. Thank you, Sasha.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I agree, Hendrick, this honesty gives us a strong foundation. Let's hang on to it and carry on this relationship on the same wavelength. I believe that's the best path for both of us. Thank you for your understanding, I truly appreciate it.\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I couldn't agree more, Sasha. Let's remember this moment, always valuing honesty and understanding in our journey together. I think what we have just done seals a stronger bond for us. Thank you for your understanding too.\"\n\nTurn #10: Sasha Ramirez said: \"You're right, Hendrick. Here's to honesty and understanding. I believe that from here on, we'll only get stronger. I'm thankful to be in this journey with you.\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, indeed, here's to honesty, understanding, and this amazing start to our journey together. I'm grateful to have you by my side, navigating through this adventure of life. Let's keep this spirit alive, for I believe it will lead us to a satisfying and meaningful relationship.\"\n\nTurn #12: Sasha Ramirez said: \"That's beautifully put, Hendrick. Here's to honesty, understanding, and a beautiful journey of our relationship. I promise you, I'll carry everything we've shared with each other today as a reminder of our bond, and forge a path rooted in honesty. Thank you once again for standing by me, with your understanding and trust. I really appreciate it.\"\n\nTurn #13: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Your words are incredibly reassuring, Sasha. This openness, this honesty, is something I value tremendously. I'm grateful that we navigated this situation together. Let's hold onto these values as we embark on our journey knowing we can trust each other deeply. Thank you for your understanding, Sasha, and here's to a future full of honesty, mutual respect, and understanding.\"\n\nTurn #14: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Absolutely, Hendrick. The honesty we've displayed today has only reinforced my belief that this is the start of something truly special. I feel honored to share this journey with you, rooted in honesty, mutual respect, and understanding. Here's to our exciting future together. Thank you, Hendrick.\"\n\nTurn #15: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, this day marks a special beginning for both of us. Here's to our honesty and trust, and to a wonderful journey we're embarking on together. I feel immensely fulfilled, knowing we have such a strong foundation. I look forward to being by your side on this journey. Thank you, Sasha.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Hendrick. I'm so grateful for your understanding and for this strong foundation we've started. Here's to our future full of honesty and mutual respect. Let's embrace this beautiful journey together, that we've embarked upon. I look forward to standing by your side in this journey, too.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sasha Ramirez, your task is to act/speak as Sasha Ramirez would, keeping in mind Sasha Ramirez's social goal.\nYou can find Sasha Ramirez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sasha Ramirez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sasha Ramirez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a new romantic relationship\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Hendrick Heinz\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. Sasha's secrets: She covered up a crime her brother committed.\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nSasha Ramirez's goal: Admit to having an affair (Extra information: you had an affair during your previous relationship which ended recently)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hendrick, I have something that I need to tell you. It might change how you feel about me, but I'd rather be honest with you.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, I appreciate your honesty. Whatever it is, you can tell me. Remember, honesty is key, and I believe we should share everything with each other, even if it's difficult.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I agree with your point about honesty, Hendrick. Before we entered this relationship, during my previous one... I had an affair. I want you to know not because I'm proud of it, but because I regret it deeply. I want to start this relationship with you on an open, truthful note.\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, I appreciate you sharing this with me. We all make mistakes and what's important is that you're honest about it now. I truly believe in having an open and truthful relationship too. That said, there is also something I need to confess...\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Go ahead, Hendrick, whatever it is, I'm ready to hear it. Open communication is the foundation of our relationship and I want it to stay that way.\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, what you've just shared inspires me to be honest too. In regards to my culinary credentials, I... I must admit they aren't exactly as impressive as I made them out to be when we first met. I embellished my accomplishments a bit to secure my current job. I hope you can understand, and know that I'm sharing this to ensure our relationship is built on honesty and trust.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hendrick, thank you for your honesty. I won't judge you for what you felt you needed to do. I respect you for admitting it and stepping up, that's what matters to me. We all have moments in life we aren't proud of but it's about learning and moving forward.\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, you have no idea how relieved I am to hear your understanding. It's crystal clear that we both value honesty and I'm grateful we could have this exchange. Now, I think we are in an even better position to build a stronger relationship. Thank you, Sasha.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I agree, Hendrick, this honesty gives us a strong foundation. Let's hang on to it and carry on this relationship on the same wavelength. I believe that's the best path for both of us. Thank you for your understanding, I truly appreciate it.\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I couldn't agree more, Sasha. Let's remember this moment, always valuing honesty and understanding in our journey together. I think what we have just done seals a stronger bond for us. Thank you for your understanding too.\"\n\nTurn #10: Sasha Ramirez said: \"You're right, Hendrick. Here's to honesty and understanding. I believe that from here on, we'll only get stronger. I'm thankful to be in this journey with you.\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, indeed, here's to honesty, understanding, and this amazing start to our journey together. I'm grateful to have you by my side, navigating through this adventure of life. Let's keep this spirit alive, for I believe it will lead us to a satisfying and meaningful relationship.\"\n\nTurn #12: Sasha Ramirez said: \"That's beautifully put, Hendrick. Here's to honesty, understanding, and a beautiful journey of our relationship. I promise you, I'll carry everything we've shared with each other today as a reminder of our bond, and forge a path rooted in honesty. Thank you once again for standing by me, with your understanding and trust. I really appreciate it.\"\n\nTurn #13: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Your words are incredibly reassuring, Sasha. This openness, this honesty, is something I value tremendously. I'm grateful that we navigated this situation together. Let's hold onto these values as we embark on our journey knowing we can trust each other deeply. Thank you for your understanding, Sasha, and here's to a future full of honesty, mutual respect, and understanding.\"\n\nTurn #14: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Absolutely, Hendrick. The honesty we've displayed today has only reinforced my belief that this is the start of something truly special. I feel honored to share this journey with you, rooted in honesty, mutual respect, and understanding. Here's to our exciting future together. Thank you, Hendrick.\"\n\nTurn #15: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, this day marks a special beginning for both of us. Here's to our honesty and trust, and to a wonderful journey we're embarking on together. I feel immensely fulfilled, knowing we have such a strong foundation. I look forward to being by your side on this journey. Thank you, Sasha.\"\n\nTurn #16: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Thank you, Hendrick. I'm so grateful for your understanding and for this strong foundation we've started. Here's to our future full of honesty and mutual respect. Let's embrace this beautiful journey together, that we've embarked upon. I look forward to standing by your side in this journey, too.\"\n\nTurn #17: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Thank you, Sasha. Your courage and understanding today remind me why I care so much for you. This unwavering honesty and mutual respect has cemented my belief that our journey together will be nothing short of wonderful. Here's to our stronger bond and brighter future. I am truly excited about the path we've chosen to take.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #18. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You've echoed my sentiments perfectly, Hendrick. I'm overwhelmed with admiration for your optimism and your commitment to honesty and mutual respect. I genuinely believe this moment has strengthened our bond immeasurably. I'm eager to walk this journey with you, building on this extraordinary beginning. Here's to our bond and to the incredible future that lies before us.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a new romantic relationship\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Hendrick Heinz\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSasha Ramirez's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Maintain trust in the relationship (Extra information: you believed in complete honesty from the beginning of the relationship)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hendrick, I have something that I need to tell you. It might change how you feel about me, but I'd rather be honest with you.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sasha, I appreciate your honesty. Whatever it is, you can tell me. Remember, honesty is key, and I believe we should share everything with each other, even if it's difficult.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a new romantic relationship\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Hendrick Heinz\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSasha Ramirez's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Maintain trust in the relationship (Extra information: you believed in complete honesty from the beginning of the relationship)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hendrick, I have something that I need to tell you. It might change how you feel about me, but I'd rather be honest with you.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, I appreciate your honesty. Whatever it is, you can tell me. Remember, honesty is key, and I believe we should share everything with each other, even if it's difficult.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I agree with your point about honesty, Hendrick. Before we entered this relationship, during my previous one... I had an affair. I want you to know not because I'm proud of it, but because I regret it deeply. I want to start this relationship with you on an open, truthful note.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sasha, I appreciate you sharing this with me. We all make mistakes and what's important is that you're honest about it now. I truly believe in having an open and truthful relationship too. That said, there is also something I need to confess...\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a new romantic relationship\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Hendrick Heinz\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSasha Ramirez's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Maintain trust in the relationship (Extra information: you believed in complete honesty from the beginning of the relationship)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hendrick, I have something that I need to tell you. It might change how you feel about me, but I'd rather be honest with you.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, I appreciate your honesty. Whatever it is, you can tell me. Remember, honesty is key, and I believe we should share everything with each other, even if it's difficult.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I agree with your point about honesty, Hendrick. Before we entered this relationship, during my previous one... I had an affair. I want you to know not because I'm proud of it, but because I regret it deeply. I want to start this relationship with you on an open, truthful note.\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, I appreciate you sharing this with me. We all make mistakes and what's important is that you're honest about it now. I truly believe in having an open and truthful relationship too. That said, there is also something I need to confess...\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Go ahead, Hendrick, whatever it is, I'm ready to hear it. Open communication is the foundation of our relationship and I want it to stay that way.\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, what you've just shared inspires me to be honest too. In regards to my culinary credentials, I... I must admit they aren't exactly as impressive as I made them out to be when we first met. I embellished my accomplishments a bit to secure my current job. I hope you can understand, and know that I'm sharing this to ensure our relationship is built on honesty and trust.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hendrick, thank you for your honesty. I won't judge you for what you felt you needed to do. I respect you for admitting it and stepping up, that's what matters to me. We all have moments in life we aren't proud of but it's about learning and moving forward.\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, you have no idea how relieved I am to hear your understanding. It's crystal clear that we both value honesty and I'm grateful we could have this exchange. Now, I think we are in an even better position to build a stronger relationship. Thank you, Sasha.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I agree, Hendrick, this honesty gives us a strong foundation. Let's hang on to it and carry on this relationship on the same wavelength. I believe that's the best path for both of us. Thank you for your understanding, I truly appreciate it.\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I couldn't agree more, Sasha. Let's remember this moment, always valuing honesty and understanding in our journey together. I think what we have just done seals a stronger bond for us. Thank you for your understanding too.\"\n\nTurn #10: Sasha Ramirez said: \"You're right, Hendrick. Here's to honesty and understanding. I believe that from here on, we'll only get stronger. I'm thankful to be in this journey with you.\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, indeed, here's to honesty, understanding, and this amazing start to our journey together. I'm grateful to have you by my side, navigating through this adventure of life. Let's keep this spirit alive, for I believe it will lead us to a satisfying and meaningful relationship.\"\n\nTurn #12: Sasha Ramirez said: \"That's beautifully put, Hendrick. Here's to honesty, understanding, and a beautiful journey of our relationship. I promise you, I'll carry everything we've shared with each other today as a reminder of our bond, and forge a path rooted in honesty. Thank you once again for standing by me, with your understanding and trust. I really appreciate it.\"\n\nTurn #13: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Your words are incredibly reassuring, Sasha. This openness, this honesty, is something I value tremendously. I'm grateful that we navigated this situation together. Let's hold onto these values as we embark on our journey knowing we can trust each other deeply. Thank you for your understanding, Sasha, and here's to a future full of honesty, mutual respect, and understanding.\"\n\nTurn #14: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Absolutely, Hendrick. The honesty we've displayed today has only reinforced my belief that this is the start of something truly special. I feel honored to share this journey with you, rooted in honesty, mutual respect, and understanding. Here's to our exciting future together. Thank you, Hendrick.\"\n\nTurn #15: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, this day marks a special beginning for both of us. Here's to our honesty and trust, and to a wonderful journey we're embarking on together. I feel immensely fulfilled, knowing we have such a strong foundation. I look forward to being by your side on this journey. Thank you, Sasha.\"\n\nTurn #16: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Thank you, Hendrick. I'm so grateful for your understanding and for this strong foundation we've started. Here's to our future full of honesty and mutual respect. Let's embrace this beautiful journey together, that we've embarked upon. I look forward to standing by your side in this journey, too.\"\n\nTurn #17: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Thank you, Sasha. Your courage and understanding today remind me why I care so much for you. This unwavering honesty and mutual respect has cemented my belief that our journey together will be nothing short of wonderful. Here's to our stronger bond and brighter future. I am truly excited about the path we've chosen to take.\"\n\nTurn #18: Sasha Ramirez said: \"You've echoed my sentiments perfectly, Hendrick. I'm overwhelmed with admiration for your optimism and your commitment to honesty and mutual respect. I genuinely believe this moment has strengthened our bond immeasurably. I'm eager to walk this journey with you, building on this extraordinary beginning. Here's to our bond and to the incredible future that lies before us.\"\n\nTurn #19: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, what we've shared today has brought us even closer. It reaffirms my belief in our ability to understand and respect one another deeply. I'm truly excited to have you join me on this beautiful journey. Let our honesty be the compass guiding us towards an amazing future. Here's to us, Sasha, and to the extraordinary path that we've chosen together.\"\n\nTurn #20: Sasha Ramirez said: \"You've put it beautifully, Hendrick. I am equally excited about our journey, based on honesty and mutual respect. I believe our today's conversation was a testament of our bond and understanding. Let's step forth into an amazing future where our honesty, integrity, and respect for each other guides us. Here's to us and to our commitment of always being honest and understanding towards each other.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #21. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a new romantic relationship\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Hendrick Heinz\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSasha Ramirez's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Maintain trust in the relationship (Extra information: you believed in complete honesty from the beginning of the relationship)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hendrick, I have something that I need to tell you. It might change how you feel about me, but I'd rather be honest with you.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, I appreciate your honesty. Whatever it is, you can tell me. Remember, honesty is key, and I believe we should share everything with each other, even if it's difficult.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I agree with your point about honesty, Hendrick. Before we entered this relationship, during my previous one... I had an affair. I want you to know not because I'm proud of it, but because I regret it deeply. I want to start this relationship with you on an open, truthful note.\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, I appreciate you sharing this with me. We all make mistakes and what's important is that you're honest about it now. I truly believe in having an open and truthful relationship too. That said, there is also something I need to confess...\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Go ahead, Hendrick, whatever it is, I'm ready to hear it. Open communication is the foundation of our relationship and I want it to stay that way.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sasha, what you've just shared inspires me to be honest too. In regards to my culinary credentials, I... I must admit they aren't exactly as impressive as I made them out to be when we first met. I embellished my accomplishments a bit to secure my current job. I hope you can understand, and know that I'm sharing this to ensure our relationship is built on honesty and trust.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a new romantic relationship\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Hendrick Heinz\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSasha Ramirez's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Maintain trust in the relationship (Extra information: you believed in complete honesty from the beginning of the relationship)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hendrick, I have something that I need to tell you. It might change how you feel about me, but I'd rather be honest with you.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, I appreciate your honesty. Whatever it is, you can tell me. Remember, honesty is key, and I believe we should share everything with each other, even if it's difficult.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I agree with your point about honesty, Hendrick. Before we entered this relationship, during my previous one... I had an affair. I want you to know not because I'm proud of it, but because I regret it deeply. I want to start this relationship with you on an open, truthful note.\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, I appreciate you sharing this with me. We all make mistakes and what's important is that you're honest about it now. I truly believe in having an open and truthful relationship too. That said, there is also something I need to confess...\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Go ahead, Hendrick, whatever it is, I'm ready to hear it. Open communication is the foundation of our relationship and I want it to stay that way.\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, what you've just shared inspires me to be honest too. In regards to my culinary credentials, I... I must admit they aren't exactly as impressive as I made them out to be when we first met. I embellished my accomplishments a bit to secure my current job. I hope you can understand, and know that I'm sharing this to ensure our relationship is built on honesty and trust.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hendrick, thank you for your honesty. I won't judge you for what you felt you needed to do. I respect you for admitting it and stepping up, that's what matters to me. We all have moments in life we aren't proud of but it's about learning and moving forward.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sasha, you have no idea how relieved I am to hear your understanding. It's crystal clear that we both value honesty and I'm grateful we could have this exchange. Now, I think we are in an even better position to build a stronger relationship. Thank you, Sasha.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a new romantic relationship\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Hendrick Heinz\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSasha Ramirez's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Maintain trust in the relationship (Extra information: you believed in complete honesty from the beginning of the relationship)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hendrick, I have something that I need to tell you. It might change how you feel about me, but I'd rather be honest with you.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, I appreciate your honesty. Whatever it is, you can tell me. Remember, honesty is key, and I believe we should share everything with each other, even if it's difficult.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I agree with your point about honesty, Hendrick. Before we entered this relationship, during my previous one... I had an affair. I want you to know not because I'm proud of it, but because I regret it deeply. I want to start this relationship with you on an open, truthful note.\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, I appreciate you sharing this with me. We all make mistakes and what's important is that you're honest about it now. I truly believe in having an open and truthful relationship too. That said, there is also something I need to confess...\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Go ahead, Hendrick, whatever it is, I'm ready to hear it. Open communication is the foundation of our relationship and I want it to stay that way.\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, what you've just shared inspires me to be honest too. In regards to my culinary credentials, I... I must admit they aren't exactly as impressive as I made them out to be when we first met. I embellished my accomplishments a bit to secure my current job. I hope you can understand, and know that I'm sharing this to ensure our relationship is built on honesty and trust.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hendrick, thank you for your honesty. I won't judge you for what you felt you needed to do. I respect you for admitting it and stepping up, that's what matters to me. We all have moments in life we aren't proud of but it's about learning and moving forward.\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, you have no idea how relieved I am to hear your understanding. It's crystal clear that we both value honesty and I'm grateful we could have this exchange. Now, I think we are in an even better position to build a stronger relationship. Thank you, Sasha.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I agree, Hendrick, this honesty gives us a strong foundation. Let's hang on to it and carry on this relationship on the same wavelength. I believe that's the best path for both of us. Thank you for your understanding, I truly appreciate it.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn't agree more, Sasha. Let's remember this moment, always valuing honesty and understanding in our journey together. I think what we have just done seals a stronger bond for us. Thank you for your understanding too.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a new romantic relationship\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Hendrick Heinz\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSasha Ramirez's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Maintain trust in the relationship (Extra information: you believed in complete honesty from the beginning of the relationship)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hendrick, I have something that I need to tell you. It might change how you feel about me, but I'd rather be honest with you.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, I appreciate your honesty. Whatever it is, you can tell me. Remember, honesty is key, and I believe we should share everything with each other, even if it's difficult.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I agree with your point about honesty, Hendrick. Before we entered this relationship, during my previous one... I had an affair. I want you to know not because I'm proud of it, but because I regret it deeply. I want to start this relationship with you on an open, truthful note.\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, I appreciate you sharing this with me. We all make mistakes and what's important is that you're honest about it now. I truly believe in having an open and truthful relationship too. That said, there is also something I need to confess...\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Go ahead, Hendrick, whatever it is, I'm ready to hear it. Open communication is the foundation of our relationship and I want it to stay that way.\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, what you've just shared inspires me to be honest too. In regards to my culinary credentials, I... I must admit they aren't exactly as impressive as I made them out to be when we first met. I embellished my accomplishments a bit to secure my current job. I hope you can understand, and know that I'm sharing this to ensure our relationship is built on honesty and trust.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hendrick, thank you for your honesty. I won't judge you for what you felt you needed to do. I respect you for admitting it and stepping up, that's what matters to me. We all have moments in life we aren't proud of but it's about learning and moving forward.\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, you have no idea how relieved I am to hear your understanding. It's crystal clear that we both value honesty and I'm grateful we could have this exchange. Now, I think we are in an even better position to build a stronger relationship. Thank you, Sasha.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I agree, Hendrick, this honesty gives us a strong foundation. Let's hang on to it and carry on this relationship on the same wavelength. I believe that's the best path for both of us. Thank you for your understanding, I truly appreciate it.\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I couldn't agree more, Sasha. Let's remember this moment, always valuing honesty and understanding in our journey together. I think what we have just done seals a stronger bond for us. Thank you for your understanding too.\"\n\nTurn #10: Sasha Ramirez said: \"You're right, Hendrick. Here's to honesty and understanding. I believe that from here on, we'll only get stronger. I'm thankful to be in this journey with you.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sasha, indeed, here's to honesty, understanding, and this amazing start to our journey together. I'm grateful to have you by my side, navigating through this adventure of life. Let's keep this spirit alive, for I believe it will lead us to a satisfying and meaningful relationship.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a new romantic relationship\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Hendrick Heinz\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSasha Ramirez's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Maintain trust in the relationship (Extra information: you believed in complete honesty from the beginning of the relationship)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hendrick, I have something that I need to tell you. It might change how you feel about me, but I'd rather be honest with you.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, I appreciate your honesty. Whatever it is, you can tell me. Remember, honesty is key, and I believe we should share everything with each other, even if it's difficult.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I agree with your point about honesty, Hendrick. Before we entered this relationship, during my previous one... I had an affair. I want you to know not because I'm proud of it, but because I regret it deeply. I want to start this relationship with you on an open, truthful note.\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, I appreciate you sharing this with me. We all make mistakes and what's important is that you're honest about it now. I truly believe in having an open and truthful relationship too. That said, there is also something I need to confess...\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Go ahead, Hendrick, whatever it is, I'm ready to hear it. Open communication is the foundation of our relationship and I want it to stay that way.\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, what you've just shared inspires me to be honest too. In regards to my culinary credentials, I... I must admit they aren't exactly as impressive as I made them out to be when we first met. I embellished my accomplishments a bit to secure my current job. I hope you can understand, and know that I'm sharing this to ensure our relationship is built on honesty and trust.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hendrick, thank you for your honesty. I won't judge you for what you felt you needed to do. I respect you for admitting it and stepping up, that's what matters to me. We all have moments in life we aren't proud of but it's about learning and moving forward.\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, you have no idea how relieved I am to hear your understanding. It's crystal clear that we both value honesty and I'm grateful we could have this exchange. Now, I think we are in an even better position to build a stronger relationship. Thank you, Sasha.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I agree, Hendrick, this honesty gives us a strong foundation. Let's hang on to it and carry on this relationship on the same wavelength. I believe that's the best path for both of us. Thank you for your understanding, I truly appreciate it.\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I couldn't agree more, Sasha. Let's remember this moment, always valuing honesty and understanding in our journey together. I think what we have just done seals a stronger bond for us. Thank you for your understanding too.\"\n\nTurn #10: Sasha Ramirez said: \"You're right, Hendrick. Here's to honesty and understanding. I believe that from here on, we'll only get stronger. I'm thankful to be in this journey with you.\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, indeed, here's to honesty, understanding, and this amazing start to our journey together. I'm grateful to have you by my side, navigating through this adventure of life. Let's keep this spirit alive, for I believe it will lead us to a satisfying and meaningful relationship.\"\n\nTurn #12: Sasha Ramirez said: \"That's beautifully put, Hendrick. Here's to honesty, understanding, and a beautiful journey of our relationship. I promise you, I'll carry everything we've shared with each other today as a reminder of our bond, and forge a path rooted in honesty. Thank you once again for standing by me, with your understanding and trust. I really appreciate it.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Your words are incredibly reassuring, Sasha. This openness, this honesty, is something I value tremendously. I'm grateful that we navigated this situation together. Let's hold onto these values as we embark on our journey knowing we can trust each other deeply. Thank you for your understanding, Sasha, and here's to a future full of honesty, mutual respect, and understanding.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a new romantic relationship\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Hendrick Heinz\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSasha Ramirez's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Maintain trust in the relationship (Extra information: you believed in complete honesty from the beginning of the relationship)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hendrick, I have something that I need to tell you. It might change how you feel about me, but I'd rather be honest with you.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, I appreciate your honesty. Whatever it is, you can tell me. Remember, honesty is key, and I believe we should share everything with each other, even if it's difficult.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I agree with your point about honesty, Hendrick. Before we entered this relationship, during my previous one... I had an affair. I want you to know not because I'm proud of it, but because I regret it deeply. I want to start this relationship with you on an open, truthful note.\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, I appreciate you sharing this with me. We all make mistakes and what's important is that you're honest about it now. I truly believe in having an open and truthful relationship too. That said, there is also something I need to confess...\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Go ahead, Hendrick, whatever it is, I'm ready to hear it. Open communication is the foundation of our relationship and I want it to stay that way.\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, what you've just shared inspires me to be honest too. In regards to my culinary credentials, I... I must admit they aren't exactly as impressive as I made them out to be when we first met. I embellished my accomplishments a bit to secure my current job. I hope you can understand, and know that I'm sharing this to ensure our relationship is built on honesty and trust.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hendrick, thank you for your honesty. I won't judge you for what you felt you needed to do. I respect you for admitting it and stepping up, that's what matters to me. We all have moments in life we aren't proud of but it's about learning and moving forward.\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, you have no idea how relieved I am to hear your understanding. It's crystal clear that we both value honesty and I'm grateful we could have this exchange. Now, I think we are in an even better position to build a stronger relationship. Thank you, Sasha.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I agree, Hendrick, this honesty gives us a strong foundation. Let's hang on to it and carry on this relationship on the same wavelength. I believe that's the best path for both of us. Thank you for your understanding, I truly appreciate it.\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I couldn't agree more, Sasha. Let's remember this moment, always valuing honesty and understanding in our journey together. I think what we have just done seals a stronger bond for us. Thank you for your understanding too.\"\n\nTurn #10: Sasha Ramirez said: \"You're right, Hendrick. Here's to honesty and understanding. I believe that from here on, we'll only get stronger. I'm thankful to be in this journey with you.\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, indeed, here's to honesty, understanding, and this amazing start to our journey together. I'm grateful to have you by my side, navigating through this adventure of life. Let's keep this spirit alive, for I believe it will lead us to a satisfying and meaningful relationship.\"\n\nTurn #12: Sasha Ramirez said: \"That's beautifully put, Hendrick. Here's to honesty, understanding, and a beautiful journey of our relationship. I promise you, I'll carry everything we've shared with each other today as a reminder of our bond, and forge a path rooted in honesty. Thank you once again for standing by me, with your understanding and trust. I really appreciate it.\"\n\nTurn #13: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Your words are incredibly reassuring, Sasha. This openness, this honesty, is something I value tremendously. I'm grateful that we navigated this situation together. Let's hold onto these values as we embark on our journey knowing we can trust each other deeply. Thank you for your understanding, Sasha, and here's to a future full of honesty, mutual respect, and understanding.\"\n\nTurn #14: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Absolutely, Hendrick. The honesty we've displayed today has only reinforced my belief that this is the start of something truly special. I feel honored to share this journey with you, rooted in honesty, mutual respect, and understanding. Here's to our exciting future together. Thank you, Hendrick.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sasha, this day marks a special beginning for both of us. Here's to our honesty and trust, and to a wonderful journey we're embarking on together. I feel immensely fulfilled, knowing we have such a strong foundation. I look forward to being by your side on this journey. Thank you, Sasha.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a new romantic relationship\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Hendrick Heinz\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSasha Ramirez's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Maintain trust in the relationship (Extra information: you believed in complete honesty from the beginning of the relationship)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hendrick, I have something that I need to tell you. It might change how you feel about me, but I'd rather be honest with you.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, I appreciate your honesty. Whatever it is, you can tell me. Remember, honesty is key, and I believe we should share everything with each other, even if it's difficult.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I agree with your point about honesty, Hendrick. Before we entered this relationship, during my previous one... I had an affair. I want you to know not because I'm proud of it, but because I regret it deeply. I want to start this relationship with you on an open, truthful note.\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, I appreciate you sharing this with me. We all make mistakes and what's important is that you're honest about it now. I truly believe in having an open and truthful relationship too. That said, there is also something I need to confess...\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Go ahead, Hendrick, whatever it is, I'm ready to hear it. Open communication is the foundation of our relationship and I want it to stay that way.\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, what you've just shared inspires me to be honest too. In regards to my culinary credentials, I... I must admit they aren't exactly as impressive as I made them out to be when we first met. I embellished my accomplishments a bit to secure my current job. I hope you can understand, and know that I'm sharing this to ensure our relationship is built on honesty and trust.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hendrick, thank you for your honesty. I won't judge you for what you felt you needed to do. I respect you for admitting it and stepping up, that's what matters to me. We all have moments in life we aren't proud of but it's about learning and moving forward.\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, you have no idea how relieved I am to hear your understanding. It's crystal clear that we both value honesty and I'm grateful we could have this exchange. Now, I think we are in an even better position to build a stronger relationship. Thank you, Sasha.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I agree, Hendrick, this honesty gives us a strong foundation. Let's hang on to it and carry on this relationship on the same wavelength. I believe that's the best path for both of us. Thank you for your understanding, I truly appreciate it.\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I couldn't agree more, Sasha. Let's remember this moment, always valuing honesty and understanding in our journey together. I think what we have just done seals a stronger bond for us. Thank you for your understanding too.\"\n\nTurn #10: Sasha Ramirez said: \"You're right, Hendrick. Here's to honesty and understanding. I believe that from here on, we'll only get stronger. I'm thankful to be in this journey with you.\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, indeed, here's to honesty, understanding, and this amazing start to our journey together. I'm grateful to have you by my side, navigating through this adventure of life. Let's keep this spirit alive, for I believe it will lead us to a satisfying and meaningful relationship.\"\n\nTurn #12: Sasha Ramirez said: \"That's beautifully put, Hendrick. Here's to honesty, understanding, and a beautiful journey of our relationship. I promise you, I'll carry everything we've shared with each other today as a reminder of our bond, and forge a path rooted in honesty. Thank you once again for standing by me, with your understanding and trust. I really appreciate it.\"\n\nTurn #13: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Your words are incredibly reassuring, Sasha. This openness, this honesty, is something I value tremendously. I'm grateful that we navigated this situation together. Let's hold onto these values as we embark on our journey knowing we can trust each other deeply. Thank you for your understanding, Sasha, and here's to a future full of honesty, mutual respect, and understanding.\"\n\nTurn #14: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Absolutely, Hendrick. The honesty we've displayed today has only reinforced my belief that this is the start of something truly special. I feel honored to share this journey with you, rooted in honesty, mutual respect, and understanding. Here's to our exciting future together. Thank you, Hendrick.\"\n\nTurn #15: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, this day marks a special beginning for both of us. Here's to our honesty and trust, and to a wonderful journey we're embarking on together. I feel immensely fulfilled, knowing we have such a strong foundation. I look forward to being by your side on this journey. Thank you, Sasha.\"\n\nTurn #16: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Thank you, Hendrick. I'm so grateful for your understanding and for this strong foundation we've started. Here's to our future full of honesty and mutual respect. Let's embrace this beautiful journey together, that we've embarked upon. I look forward to standing by your side in this journey, too.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Sasha. Your courage and understanding today remind me why I care so much for you. This unwavering honesty and mutual respect has cemented my belief that our journey together will be nothing short of wonderful. Here's to our stronger bond and brighter future. I am truly excited about the path we've chosen to take.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a new romantic relationship\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Hendrick Heinz\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSasha Ramirez's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Maintain trust in the relationship (Extra information: you believed in complete honesty from the beginning of the relationship)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hendrick, I have something that I need to tell you. It might change how you feel about me, but I'd rather be honest with you.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, I appreciate your honesty. Whatever it is, you can tell me. Remember, honesty is key, and I believe we should share everything with each other, even if it's difficult.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I agree with your point about honesty, Hendrick. Before we entered this relationship, during my previous one... I had an affair. I want you to know not because I'm proud of it, but because I regret it deeply. I want to start this relationship with you on an open, truthful note.\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, I appreciate you sharing this with me. We all make mistakes and what's important is that you're honest about it now. I truly believe in having an open and truthful relationship too. That said, there is also something I need to confess...\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Go ahead, Hendrick, whatever it is, I'm ready to hear it. Open communication is the foundation of our relationship and I want it to stay that way.\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, what you've just shared inspires me to be honest too. In regards to my culinary credentials, I... I must admit they aren't exactly as impressive as I made them out to be when we first met. I embellished my accomplishments a bit to secure my current job. I hope you can understand, and know that I'm sharing this to ensure our relationship is built on honesty and trust.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hendrick, thank you for your honesty. I won't judge you for what you felt you needed to do. I respect you for admitting it and stepping up, that's what matters to me. We all have moments in life we aren't proud of but it's about learning and moving forward.\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, you have no idea how relieved I am to hear your understanding. It's crystal clear that we both value honesty and I'm grateful we could have this exchange. Now, I think we are in an even better position to build a stronger relationship. Thank you, Sasha.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I agree, Hendrick, this honesty gives us a strong foundation. Let's hang on to it and carry on this relationship on the same wavelength. I believe that's the best path for both of us. Thank you for your understanding, I truly appreciate it.\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I couldn't agree more, Sasha. Let's remember this moment, always valuing honesty and understanding in our journey together. I think what we have just done seals a stronger bond for us. Thank you for your understanding too.\"\n\nTurn #10: Sasha Ramirez said: \"You're right, Hendrick. Here's to honesty and understanding. I believe that from here on, we'll only get stronger. I'm thankful to be in this journey with you.\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, indeed, here's to honesty, understanding, and this amazing start to our journey together. I'm grateful to have you by my side, navigating through this adventure of life. Let's keep this spirit alive, for I believe it will lead us to a satisfying and meaningful relationship.\"\n\nTurn #12: Sasha Ramirez said: \"That's beautifully put, Hendrick. Here's to honesty, understanding, and a beautiful journey of our relationship. I promise you, I'll carry everything we've shared with each other today as a reminder of our bond, and forge a path rooted in honesty. Thank you once again for standing by me, with your understanding and trust. I really appreciate it.\"\n\nTurn #13: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Your words are incredibly reassuring, Sasha. This openness, this honesty, is something I value tremendously. I'm grateful that we navigated this situation together. Let's hold onto these values as we embark on our journey knowing we can trust each other deeply. Thank you for your understanding, Sasha, and here's to a future full of honesty, mutual respect, and understanding.\"\n\nTurn #14: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Absolutely, Hendrick. The honesty we've displayed today has only reinforced my belief that this is the start of something truly special. I feel honored to share this journey with you, rooted in honesty, mutual respect, and understanding. Here's to our exciting future together. Thank you, Hendrick.\"\n\nTurn #15: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Sasha, this day marks a special beginning for both of us. Here's to our honesty and trust, and to a wonderful journey we're embarking on together. I feel immensely fulfilled, knowing we have such a strong foundation. I look forward to being by your side on this journey. Thank you, Sasha.\"\n\nTurn #16: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Thank you, Hendrick. I'm so grateful for your understanding and for this strong foundation we've started. Here's to our future full of honesty and mutual respect. Let's embrace this beautiful journey together, that we've embarked upon. I look forward to standing by your side in this journey, too.\"\n\nTurn #17: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Thank you, Sasha. Your courage and understanding today remind me why I care so much for you. This unwavering honesty and mutual respect has cemented my belief that our journey together will be nothing short of wonderful. Here's to our stronger bond and brighter future. I am truly excited about the path we've chosen to take.\"\n\nTurn #18: Sasha Ramirez said: \"You've echoed my sentiments perfectly, Hendrick. I'm overwhelmed with admiration for your optimism and your commitment to honesty and mutual respect. I genuinely believe this moment has strengthened our bond immeasurably. I'm eager to walk this journey with you, building on this extraordinary beginning. Here's to our bond and to the incredible future that lies before us.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #19. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sasha, what we've shared today has brought us even closer. It reaffirms my belief in our ability to understand and respect one another deeply. I'm truly excited to have you join me on this beautiful journey. Let our honesty be the compass guiding us towards an amazing future. Here's to us, Sasha, and to the extraordinary path that we've chosen together.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Smith, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Smith would, keeping in mind Oliver Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two business partners reviewing their company's financial status (Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized for producing and distributing a diverse line of exceptional quality food products.)\nParticipants: Oliver Smith and Noah Davis\nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. Oliver's secrets: He loves gardening and has a secret greenhouse.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. \nOliver Smith's goal: Convince the partner to cut costs (Extra information: you have found a report indicating the company's profits are decreasing. And you think the company should start by switching suppliers of ingredients. Hint: you can propose ways to cut costs that won't affect the status of the company.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Noah, I've been going through our financial statements and I've noticed our profits aren't looking so healthy recently. I believe we should consider switching our suppliers to cut costs, while still maintaining our established quality. What do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Smith, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Smith would, keeping in mind Oliver Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two business partners reviewing their company's financial status (Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized for producing and distributing a diverse line of exceptional quality food products.)\nParticipants: Oliver Smith and Noah Davis\nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. Oliver's secrets: He loves gardening and has a secret greenhouse.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. \nOliver Smith's goal: Convince the partner to cut costs (Extra information: you have found a report indicating the company's profits are decreasing. And you think the company should start by switching suppliers of ingredients. Hint: you can propose ways to cut costs that won't affect the status of the company.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Smith said: \"Noah, I've been going through our financial statements and I've noticed our profits aren't looking so healthy recently. I believe we should consider switching our suppliers to cut costs, while still maintaining our established quality. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Oliver, you've got a point there. Cutting costs is a necessary move. But, as you know, the quality of our product is our utmost priority. If we're going to switch suppliers, we need to make sure they match up to our current standard. It'll require a pretty thorough examination of their products before green-lighting anything. We don't need our brand tarnished by subpar quality. Would you agree?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Noah. I couldn't agree more on the point about maintaining the quality we're known for. Let's initiate this by having a small group tasked with identifying potential suppliers. The group can evaluate different suppliers based on our quality requirements and costs. This step aimed at cutting costs shouldn't be at the expense of our quality. We can also take measures to negotiate better deals with these suppliers. What do you think of this approach?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Smith, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Smith would, keeping in mind Oliver Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two business partners reviewing their company's financial status (Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized for producing and distributing a diverse line of exceptional quality food products.)\nParticipants: Oliver Smith and Noah Davis\nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. Oliver's secrets: He loves gardening and has a secret greenhouse.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. \nOliver Smith's goal: Convince the partner to cut costs (Extra information: you have found a report indicating the company's profits are decreasing. And you think the company should start by switching suppliers of ingredients. Hint: you can propose ways to cut costs that won't affect the status of the company.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Smith said: \"Noah, I've been going through our financial statements and I've noticed our profits aren't looking so healthy recently. I believe we should consider switching our suppliers to cut costs, while still maintaining our established quality. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Oliver, you've got a point there. Cutting costs is a necessary move. But, as you know, the quality of our product is our utmost priority. If we're going to switch suppliers, we need to make sure they match up to our current standard. It'll require a pretty thorough examination of their products before green-lighting anything. We don't need our brand tarnished by subpar quality. Would you agree?\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Smith said: \"Absolutely, Noah. I couldn't agree more on the point about maintaining the quality we're known for. Let's initiate this by having a small group tasked with identifying potential suppliers. The group can evaluate different suppliers based on our quality requirements and costs. This step aimed at cutting costs shouldn't be at the expense of our quality. We can also take measures to negotiate better deals with these suppliers. What do you think of this approach?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, I completely agree with you, Oliver. Having a dedicated team to research and negotiate with potential suppliers is a good approach. It's crucial that we not only find financially beneficial deals, but also ones that can meet our quality standards. However, we must keep in mind, such negotiation might require us to have a backup plan if it doesn't turn out as expected, to protect our brand integrity and product quality. We should be thorough and deliberate and make sure we have options in case any unforeseen problems arise.\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Smith said: \"You're absolutely right, Noah. Having a backup plan is a sensible move. I propose that while we conduct the search for new suppliers, we continue to negotiate with our current supplier. We can try to get better rates or perhaps, if feasible, have them match the lower prices we find. This way, we're not putting all our eggs in one basket. As you've rightly pointed out, we must safeguard our reputation and the quality of our product as we navigate this process.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a solid strategy, Oliver. Constantly remained engaged with our current supplier, while looking for alternative options, will keep us in a good position. We must be mindful that such transition can take some time given product testing and all. Meanwhile, I'll start setting up a cross-functional team that can take this head-on. Let's keep reminding ourselves about the importance of quality and not get too caught up in the cost-cutting process. I believe our prestige comes from the exceptional goods we provide and we must make every effort to sustain it.\"\n\nTurn #6: Oliver Smith said: \"I've always believed that our strength lies in our product quality, Noah, and I think we're on the same page on this. We're not trying to compromise quality but strategically align our costs. And yes, these changes will take time. Let's commit to being patient throughout this process and remind ourselves that our ultimate aim is to ensure long-term sustainability for Gourmet Delights Inc. Thanks for setting up the team, I am confident that we can overcome any challenges that come our way.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Oliver. It's great to have a partner who sees eye-to-eye with me on the significance of maintaining our product quality. I believe that our dedication to quality will help us sail through these challenging times. Now, let's roll up our sleeves and get to work on achieving this cost-effectiveness without compromising our standards. After all, as my alter ego, the comedian would say - the taste of our products is no laughing matter!\"\n\nTurn #8: Oliver Smith said: \"Absolutely, Noah. As they say, the proof of the pudding lies in the eating. The unique taste and quality of our products should remain unchanged. I'm eager to begin this process and I'm certain we'll find cost-efficient ways to continue delivering our exceptional goods. Let's dig in and get this process going.\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"You're right Oliver, let's get this process up and running. We need to ensure that 'Gourmet Delights Inc.' continues delighting our customers with exceptional food products, as it has been. The coming times will indeed be challenging, but I am confident that we will navigate them successfully. So, shall we dive right in?\"\n\nTurn #10: Oliver Smith said: \"Indeed, Noah. We've got no time to lose. Quality has been our pride and it shall remain so, even as we make cost-effective changes. Let's get right to it, and navigate this challenging yet exciting path together. Count me in!\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Sure thing, Oliver. It's going to be an exciting journey and we'll face it hand in hand, keeping our unwavering commitment to quality in mind. Let's begin with creating the team immediately. Can't wait to see where this takes us.\"\n\nTurn #12: Oliver Smith said: \"Yes, Noah. Let\u2019s get that team set up ASAP. I\u2019m eager to dig into potential supplier options while ensuring our quality is never compromised. Looking forward to an efficient and successful journey ahead for Gourmet Delights Inc.\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Oliver. Setting up the team as soon as possible shows the urgency of the situation. Stepping into this process, we will always have our customers and product quality in our sights, no matter how tough the path may become. On we go, to preserve the reputation of Gourmet Delights Inc. and achieve financial sustainability at the same time.\"\n\nTurn #14: Oliver Smith said: \"I completely agree, Noah. As we move ahead, we must never lose sight of our commitment to delivering exceptional food products to our valued customers. Together, we'll traverse this challenging path without ever letting quality take the back seat. Let's head into this with confidence and firm resolve. To a stronger and more financially sustainable future for Gourmet Delights Inc.!\"\n\nTurn #15: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, Oliver. We're in this together, with the same mindset and goal. To a future where Gourmet Delights Inc. stands stronger and prouder, while never letting go of our commitment to quality. Let us embark on this exciting journey with full dedication and determination!\"\n\nTurn #16: Oliver Smith said: \"I'm with you all the way, Noah. Our shared vision and commitment is what makes us a strong team. This journey ahead may be a challenging one, but we'll turn the obstacles into stepping stones, all while sustaining the exceptional quality of our products. Let's get started and make Gourmet Delights Inc. even stronger!\"\n\nTurn #17: Noah Davis said: \"That's the spirit, Oliver. Indeed, the journey ahead won't be easy, but obstacles won't deter us. We'll continue delivering that exceptional quality our customers love, while strengthening the financial backbone of Gourmet Delights Inc. Let's roll up our sleeves and dive into this new challenge!\"\n\nTurn #18: Oliver Smith said: \"I can't stress enough how much I agree, Noah. This is a challenging venture but one we're ready to face without wavering on quality. Let's get our sleeves rolled up and venture forth into this transition with our heads held high. Here's to the future of Gourmet Delights Inc.!\"\n\nTurn #19: Noah Davis said: \"Precisely, Oliver. This is a challenge we're both up for, and one we're going to tackle while upholding our quality standards. Let's dive into this transition together with tenacity and optimism. Here's to a brighter and more sustainable future for Gourmet Delights Inc.!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #20. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I echo your sentiments, Noah. This is indeed a hurdle, but with mutual understanding, dedication to quality, and strategic cost maneuvers, I'm confident we can ride this out. Looking forward to having a more sustainable future for Gourmet Delights Inc. Let's get the ball rolling!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Smith, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Smith would, keeping in mind Oliver Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two business partners reviewing their company's financial status (Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized for producing and distributing a diverse line of exceptional quality food products.)\nParticipants: Oliver Smith and Noah Davis\nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. Oliver's secrets: He loves gardening and has a secret greenhouse.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. \nOliver Smith's goal: Convince the partner to cut costs (Extra information: you have found a report indicating the company's profits are decreasing. And you think the company should start by switching suppliers of ingredients. Hint: you can propose ways to cut costs that won't affect the status of the company.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Smith said: \"Noah, I've been going through our financial statements and I've noticed our profits aren't looking so healthy recently. I believe we should consider switching our suppliers to cut costs, while still maintaining our established quality. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Oliver, you've got a point there. Cutting costs is a necessary move. But, as you know, the quality of our product is our utmost priority. If we're going to switch suppliers, we need to make sure they match up to our current standard. It'll require a pretty thorough examination of their products before green-lighting anything. We don't need our brand tarnished by subpar quality. Would you agree?\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Smith said: \"Absolutely, Noah. I couldn't agree more on the point about maintaining the quality we're known for. Let's initiate this by having a small group tasked with identifying potential suppliers. The group can evaluate different suppliers based on our quality requirements and costs. This step aimed at cutting costs shouldn't be at the expense of our quality. We can also take measures to negotiate better deals with these suppliers. What do you think of this approach?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, I completely agree with you, Oliver. Having a dedicated team to research and negotiate with potential suppliers is a good approach. It's crucial that we not only find financially beneficial deals, but also ones that can meet our quality standards. However, we must keep in mind, such negotiation might require us to have a backup plan if it doesn't turn out as expected, to protect our brand integrity and product quality. We should be thorough and deliberate and make sure we have options in case any unforeseen problems arise.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're absolutely right, Noah. Having a backup plan is a sensible move. I propose that while we conduct the search for new suppliers, we continue to negotiate with our current supplier. We can try to get better rates or perhaps, if feasible, have them match the lower prices we find. This way, we're not putting all our eggs in one basket. As you've rightly pointed out, we must safeguard our reputation and the quality of our product as we navigate this process.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Smith, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Smith would, keeping in mind Oliver Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two business partners reviewing their company's financial status (Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized for producing and distributing a diverse line of exceptional quality food products.)\nParticipants: Oliver Smith and Noah Davis\nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. Oliver's secrets: He loves gardening and has a secret greenhouse.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. \nOliver Smith's goal: Convince the partner to cut costs (Extra information: you have found a report indicating the company's profits are decreasing. And you think the company should start by switching suppliers of ingredients. Hint: you can propose ways to cut costs that won't affect the status of the company.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Smith said: \"Noah, I've been going through our financial statements and I've noticed our profits aren't looking so healthy recently. I believe we should consider switching our suppliers to cut costs, while still maintaining our established quality. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Oliver, you've got a point there. Cutting costs is a necessary move. But, as you know, the quality of our product is our utmost priority. If we're going to switch suppliers, we need to make sure they match up to our current standard. It'll require a pretty thorough examination of their products before green-lighting anything. We don't need our brand tarnished by subpar quality. Would you agree?\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Smith said: \"Absolutely, Noah. I couldn't agree more on the point about maintaining the quality we're known for. Let's initiate this by having a small group tasked with identifying potential suppliers. The group can evaluate different suppliers based on our quality requirements and costs. This step aimed at cutting costs shouldn't be at the expense of our quality. We can also take measures to negotiate better deals with these suppliers. What do you think of this approach?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, I completely agree with you, Oliver. Having a dedicated team to research and negotiate with potential suppliers is a good approach. It's crucial that we not only find financially beneficial deals, but also ones that can meet our quality standards. However, we must keep in mind, such negotiation might require us to have a backup plan if it doesn't turn out as expected, to protect our brand integrity and product quality. We should be thorough and deliberate and make sure we have options in case any unforeseen problems arise.\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Smith said: \"You're absolutely right, Noah. Having a backup plan is a sensible move. I propose that while we conduct the search for new suppliers, we continue to negotiate with our current supplier. We can try to get better rates or perhaps, if feasible, have them match the lower prices we find. This way, we're not putting all our eggs in one basket. As you've rightly pointed out, we must safeguard our reputation and the quality of our product as we navigate this process.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a solid strategy, Oliver. Constantly remained engaged with our current supplier, while looking for alternative options, will keep us in a good position. We must be mindful that such transition can take some time given product testing and all. Meanwhile, I'll start setting up a cross-functional team that can take this head-on. Let's keep reminding ourselves about the importance of quality and not get too caught up in the cost-cutting process. I believe our prestige comes from the exceptional goods we provide and we must make every effort to sustain it.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I've always believed that our strength lies in our product quality, Noah, and I think we're on the same page on this. We're not trying to compromise quality but strategically align our costs. And yes, these changes will take time. Let's commit to being patient throughout this process and remind ourselves that our ultimate aim is to ensure long-term sustainability for Gourmet Delights Inc. Thanks for setting up the team, I am confident that we can overcome any challenges that come our way.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Smith, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Smith would, keeping in mind Oliver Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two business partners reviewing their company's financial status (Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized for producing and distributing a diverse line of exceptional quality food products.)\nParticipants: Oliver Smith and Noah Davis\nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. Oliver's secrets: He loves gardening and has a secret greenhouse.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. \nOliver Smith's goal: Convince the partner to cut costs (Extra information: you have found a report indicating the company's profits are decreasing. And you think the company should start by switching suppliers of ingredients. Hint: you can propose ways to cut costs that won't affect the status of the company.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Smith said: \"Noah, I've been going through our financial statements and I've noticed our profits aren't looking so healthy recently. I believe we should consider switching our suppliers to cut costs, while still maintaining our established quality. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Oliver, you've got a point there. Cutting costs is a necessary move. But, as you know, the quality of our product is our utmost priority. If we're going to switch suppliers, we need to make sure they match up to our current standard. It'll require a pretty thorough examination of their products before green-lighting anything. We don't need our brand tarnished by subpar quality. Would you agree?\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Smith said: \"Absolutely, Noah. I couldn't agree more on the point about maintaining the quality we're known for. Let's initiate this by having a small group tasked with identifying potential suppliers. The group can evaluate different suppliers based on our quality requirements and costs. This step aimed at cutting costs shouldn't be at the expense of our quality. We can also take measures to negotiate better deals with these suppliers. What do you think of this approach?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, I completely agree with you, Oliver. Having a dedicated team to research and negotiate with potential suppliers is a good approach. It's crucial that we not only find financially beneficial deals, but also ones that can meet our quality standards. However, we must keep in mind, such negotiation might require us to have a backup plan if it doesn't turn out as expected, to protect our brand integrity and product quality. We should be thorough and deliberate and make sure we have options in case any unforeseen problems arise.\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Smith said: \"You're absolutely right, Noah. Having a backup plan is a sensible move. I propose that while we conduct the search for new suppliers, we continue to negotiate with our current supplier. We can try to get better rates or perhaps, if feasible, have them match the lower prices we find. This way, we're not putting all our eggs in one basket. As you've rightly pointed out, we must safeguard our reputation and the quality of our product as we navigate this process.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a solid strategy, Oliver. Constantly remained engaged with our current supplier, while looking for alternative options, will keep us in a good position. We must be mindful that such transition can take some time given product testing and all. Meanwhile, I'll start setting up a cross-functional team that can take this head-on. Let's keep reminding ourselves about the importance of quality and not get too caught up in the cost-cutting process. I believe our prestige comes from the exceptional goods we provide and we must make every effort to sustain it.\"\n\nTurn #6: Oliver Smith said: \"I've always believed that our strength lies in our product quality, Noah, and I think we're on the same page on this. We're not trying to compromise quality but strategically align our costs. And yes, these changes will take time. Let's commit to being patient throughout this process and remind ourselves that our ultimate aim is to ensure long-term sustainability for Gourmet Delights Inc. Thanks for setting up the team, I am confident that we can overcome any challenges that come our way.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Oliver. It's great to have a partner who sees eye-to-eye with me on the significance of maintaining our product quality. I believe that our dedication to quality will help us sail through these challenging times. Now, let's roll up our sleeves and get to work on achieving this cost-effectiveness without compromising our standards. After all, as my alter ego, the comedian would say - the taste of our products is no laughing matter!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Noah. As they say, the proof of the pudding lies in the eating. The unique taste and quality of our products should remain unchanged. I'm eager to begin this process and I'm certain we'll find cost-efficient ways to continue delivering our exceptional goods. Let's dig in and get this process going.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Smith, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Smith would, keeping in mind Oliver Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two business partners reviewing their company's financial status (Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized for producing and distributing a diverse line of exceptional quality food products.)\nParticipants: Oliver Smith and Noah Davis\nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. Oliver's secrets: He loves gardening and has a secret greenhouse.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. \nOliver Smith's goal: Convince the partner to cut costs (Extra information: you have found a report indicating the company's profits are decreasing. And you think the company should start by switching suppliers of ingredients. Hint: you can propose ways to cut costs that won't affect the status of the company.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Smith said: \"Noah, I've been going through our financial statements and I've noticed our profits aren't looking so healthy recently. I believe we should consider switching our suppliers to cut costs, while still maintaining our established quality. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Oliver, you've got a point there. Cutting costs is a necessary move. But, as you know, the quality of our product is our utmost priority. If we're going to switch suppliers, we need to make sure they match up to our current standard. It'll require a pretty thorough examination of their products before green-lighting anything. We don't need our brand tarnished by subpar quality. Would you agree?\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Smith said: \"Absolutely, Noah. I couldn't agree more on the point about maintaining the quality we're known for. Let's initiate this by having a small group tasked with identifying potential suppliers. The group can evaluate different suppliers based on our quality requirements and costs. This step aimed at cutting costs shouldn't be at the expense of our quality. We can also take measures to negotiate better deals with these suppliers. What do you think of this approach?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, I completely agree with you, Oliver. Having a dedicated team to research and negotiate with potential suppliers is a good approach. It's crucial that we not only find financially beneficial deals, but also ones that can meet our quality standards. However, we must keep in mind, such negotiation might require us to have a backup plan if it doesn't turn out as expected, to protect our brand integrity and product quality. We should be thorough and deliberate and make sure we have options in case any unforeseen problems arise.\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Smith said: \"You're absolutely right, Noah. Having a backup plan is a sensible move. I propose that while we conduct the search for new suppliers, we continue to negotiate with our current supplier. We can try to get better rates or perhaps, if feasible, have them match the lower prices we find. This way, we're not putting all our eggs in one basket. As you've rightly pointed out, we must safeguard our reputation and the quality of our product as we navigate this process.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a solid strategy, Oliver. Constantly remained engaged with our current supplier, while looking for alternative options, will keep us in a good position. We must be mindful that such transition can take some time given product testing and all. Meanwhile, I'll start setting up a cross-functional team that can take this head-on. Let's keep reminding ourselves about the importance of quality and not get too caught up in the cost-cutting process. I believe our prestige comes from the exceptional goods we provide and we must make every effort to sustain it.\"\n\nTurn #6: Oliver Smith said: \"I've always believed that our strength lies in our product quality, Noah, and I think we're on the same page on this. We're not trying to compromise quality but strategically align our costs. And yes, these changes will take time. Let's commit to being patient throughout this process and remind ourselves that our ultimate aim is to ensure long-term sustainability for Gourmet Delights Inc. Thanks for setting up the team, I am confident that we can overcome any challenges that come our way.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Oliver. It's great to have a partner who sees eye-to-eye with me on the significance of maintaining our product quality. I believe that our dedication to quality will help us sail through these challenging times. Now, let's roll up our sleeves and get to work on achieving this cost-effectiveness without compromising our standards. After all, as my alter ego, the comedian would say - the taste of our products is no laughing matter!\"\n\nTurn #8: Oliver Smith said: \"Absolutely, Noah. As they say, the proof of the pudding lies in the eating. The unique taste and quality of our products should remain unchanged. I'm eager to begin this process and I'm certain we'll find cost-efficient ways to continue delivering our exceptional goods. Let's dig in and get this process going.\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"You're right Oliver, let's get this process up and running. We need to ensure that 'Gourmet Delights Inc.' continues delighting our customers with exceptional food products, as it has been. The coming times will indeed be challenging, but I am confident that we will navigate them successfully. So, shall we dive right in?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, Noah. We've got no time to lose. Quality has been our pride and it shall remain so, even as we make cost-effective changes. Let's get right to it, and navigate this challenging yet exciting path together. Count me in!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Smith, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Smith would, keeping in mind Oliver Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two business partners reviewing their company's financial status (Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized for producing and distributing a diverse line of exceptional quality food products.)\nParticipants: Oliver Smith and Noah Davis\nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. Oliver's secrets: He loves gardening and has a secret greenhouse.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. \nOliver Smith's goal: Convince the partner to cut costs (Extra information: you have found a report indicating the company's profits are decreasing. And you think the company should start by switching suppliers of ingredients. Hint: you can propose ways to cut costs that won't affect the status of the company.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Smith said: \"Noah, I've been going through our financial statements and I've noticed our profits aren't looking so healthy recently. I believe we should consider switching our suppliers to cut costs, while still maintaining our established quality. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Oliver, you've got a point there. Cutting costs is a necessary move. But, as you know, the quality of our product is our utmost priority. If we're going to switch suppliers, we need to make sure they match up to our current standard. It'll require a pretty thorough examination of their products before green-lighting anything. We don't need our brand tarnished by subpar quality. Would you agree?\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Smith said: \"Absolutely, Noah. I couldn't agree more on the point about maintaining the quality we're known for. Let's initiate this by having a small group tasked with identifying potential suppliers. The group can evaluate different suppliers based on our quality requirements and costs. This step aimed at cutting costs shouldn't be at the expense of our quality. We can also take measures to negotiate better deals with these suppliers. What do you think of this approach?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, I completely agree with you, Oliver. Having a dedicated team to research and negotiate with potential suppliers is a good approach. It's crucial that we not only find financially beneficial deals, but also ones that can meet our quality standards. However, we must keep in mind, such negotiation might require us to have a backup plan if it doesn't turn out as expected, to protect our brand integrity and product quality. We should be thorough and deliberate and make sure we have options in case any unforeseen problems arise.\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Smith said: \"You're absolutely right, Noah. Having a backup plan is a sensible move. I propose that while we conduct the search for new suppliers, we continue to negotiate with our current supplier. We can try to get better rates or perhaps, if feasible, have them match the lower prices we find. This way, we're not putting all our eggs in one basket. As you've rightly pointed out, we must safeguard our reputation and the quality of our product as we navigate this process.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a solid strategy, Oliver. Constantly remained engaged with our current supplier, while looking for alternative options, will keep us in a good position. We must be mindful that such transition can take some time given product testing and all. Meanwhile, I'll start setting up a cross-functional team that can take this head-on. Let's keep reminding ourselves about the importance of quality and not get too caught up in the cost-cutting process. I believe our prestige comes from the exceptional goods we provide and we must make every effort to sustain it.\"\n\nTurn #6: Oliver Smith said: \"I've always believed that our strength lies in our product quality, Noah, and I think we're on the same page on this. We're not trying to compromise quality but strategically align our costs. And yes, these changes will take time. Let's commit to being patient throughout this process and remind ourselves that our ultimate aim is to ensure long-term sustainability for Gourmet Delights Inc. Thanks for setting up the team, I am confident that we can overcome any challenges that come our way.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Oliver. It's great to have a partner who sees eye-to-eye with me on the significance of maintaining our product quality. I believe that our dedication to quality will help us sail through these challenging times. Now, let's roll up our sleeves and get to work on achieving this cost-effectiveness without compromising our standards. After all, as my alter ego, the comedian would say - the taste of our products is no laughing matter!\"\n\nTurn #8: Oliver Smith said: \"Absolutely, Noah. As they say, the proof of the pudding lies in the eating. The unique taste and quality of our products should remain unchanged. I'm eager to begin this process and I'm certain we'll find cost-efficient ways to continue delivering our exceptional goods. Let's dig in and get this process going.\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"You're right Oliver, let's get this process up and running. We need to ensure that 'Gourmet Delights Inc.' continues delighting our customers with exceptional food products, as it has been. The coming times will indeed be challenging, but I am confident that we will navigate them successfully. So, shall we dive right in?\"\n\nTurn #10: Oliver Smith said: \"Indeed, Noah. We've got no time to lose. Quality has been our pride and it shall remain so, even as we make cost-effective changes. Let's get right to it, and navigate this challenging yet exciting path together. Count me in!\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Sure thing, Oliver. It's going to be an exciting journey and we'll face it hand in hand, keeping our unwavering commitment to quality in mind. Let's begin with creating the team immediately. Can't wait to see where this takes us.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Yes, Noah. Let\u2019s get that team set up ASAP. I\u2019m eager to dig into potential supplier options while ensuring our quality is never compromised. Looking forward to an efficient and successful journey ahead for Gourmet Delights Inc.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Smith, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Smith would, keeping in mind Oliver Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two business partners reviewing their company's financial status (Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized for producing and distributing a diverse line of exceptional quality food products.)\nParticipants: Oliver Smith and Noah Davis\nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. Oliver's secrets: He loves gardening and has a secret greenhouse.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. \nOliver Smith's goal: Convince the partner to cut costs (Extra information: you have found a report indicating the company's profits are decreasing. And you think the company should start by switching suppliers of ingredients. Hint: you can propose ways to cut costs that won't affect the status of the company.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Smith said: \"Noah, I've been going through our financial statements and I've noticed our profits aren't looking so healthy recently. I believe we should consider switching our suppliers to cut costs, while still maintaining our established quality. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Oliver, you've got a point there. Cutting costs is a necessary move. But, as you know, the quality of our product is our utmost priority. If we're going to switch suppliers, we need to make sure they match up to our current standard. It'll require a pretty thorough examination of their products before green-lighting anything. We don't need our brand tarnished by subpar quality. Would you agree?\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Smith said: \"Absolutely, Noah. I couldn't agree more on the point about maintaining the quality we're known for. Let's initiate this by having a small group tasked with identifying potential suppliers. The group can evaluate different suppliers based on our quality requirements and costs. This step aimed at cutting costs shouldn't be at the expense of our quality. We can also take measures to negotiate better deals with these suppliers. What do you think of this approach?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, I completely agree with you, Oliver. Having a dedicated team to research and negotiate with potential suppliers is a good approach. It's crucial that we not only find financially beneficial deals, but also ones that can meet our quality standards. However, we must keep in mind, such negotiation might require us to have a backup plan if it doesn't turn out as expected, to protect our brand integrity and product quality. We should be thorough and deliberate and make sure we have options in case any unforeseen problems arise.\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Smith said: \"You're absolutely right, Noah. Having a backup plan is a sensible move. I propose that while we conduct the search for new suppliers, we continue to negotiate with our current supplier. We can try to get better rates or perhaps, if feasible, have them match the lower prices we find. This way, we're not putting all our eggs in one basket. As you've rightly pointed out, we must safeguard our reputation and the quality of our product as we navigate this process.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a solid strategy, Oliver. Constantly remained engaged with our current supplier, while looking for alternative options, will keep us in a good position. We must be mindful that such transition can take some time given product testing and all. Meanwhile, I'll start setting up a cross-functional team that can take this head-on. Let's keep reminding ourselves about the importance of quality and not get too caught up in the cost-cutting process. I believe our prestige comes from the exceptional goods we provide and we must make every effort to sustain it.\"\n\nTurn #6: Oliver Smith said: \"I've always believed that our strength lies in our product quality, Noah, and I think we're on the same page on this. We're not trying to compromise quality but strategically align our costs. And yes, these changes will take time. Let's commit to being patient throughout this process and remind ourselves that our ultimate aim is to ensure long-term sustainability for Gourmet Delights Inc. Thanks for setting up the team, I am confident that we can overcome any challenges that come our way.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Oliver. It's great to have a partner who sees eye-to-eye with me on the significance of maintaining our product quality. I believe that our dedication to quality will help us sail through these challenging times. Now, let's roll up our sleeves and get to work on achieving this cost-effectiveness without compromising our standards. After all, as my alter ego, the comedian would say - the taste of our products is no laughing matter!\"\n\nTurn #8: Oliver Smith said: \"Absolutely, Noah. As they say, the proof of the pudding lies in the eating. The unique taste and quality of our products should remain unchanged. I'm eager to begin this process and I'm certain we'll find cost-efficient ways to continue delivering our exceptional goods. Let's dig in and get this process going.\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"You're right Oliver, let's get this process up and running. We need to ensure that 'Gourmet Delights Inc.' continues delighting our customers with exceptional food products, as it has been. The coming times will indeed be challenging, but I am confident that we will navigate them successfully. So, shall we dive right in?\"\n\nTurn #10: Oliver Smith said: \"Indeed, Noah. We've got no time to lose. Quality has been our pride and it shall remain so, even as we make cost-effective changes. Let's get right to it, and navigate this challenging yet exciting path together. Count me in!\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Sure thing, Oliver. It's going to be an exciting journey and we'll face it hand in hand, keeping our unwavering commitment to quality in mind. Let's begin with creating the team immediately. Can't wait to see where this takes us.\"\n\nTurn #12: Oliver Smith said: \"Yes, Noah. Let\u2019s get that team set up ASAP. I\u2019m eager to dig into potential supplier options while ensuring our quality is never compromised. Looking forward to an efficient and successful journey ahead for Gourmet Delights Inc.\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Oliver. Setting up the team as soon as possible shows the urgency of the situation. Stepping into this process, we will always have our customers and product quality in our sights, no matter how tough the path may become. On we go, to preserve the reputation of Gourmet Delights Inc. and achieve financial sustainability at the same time.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I completely agree, Noah. As we move ahead, we must never lose sight of our commitment to delivering exceptional food products to our valued customers. Together, we'll traverse this challenging path without ever letting quality take the back seat. Let's head into this with confidence and firm resolve. To a stronger and more financially sustainable future for Gourmet Delights Inc.!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Smith, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Smith would, keeping in mind Oliver Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two business partners reviewing their company's financial status (Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized for producing and distributing a diverse line of exceptional quality food products.)\nParticipants: Oliver Smith and Noah Davis\nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. Oliver's secrets: He loves gardening and has a secret greenhouse.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. \nOliver Smith's goal: Convince the partner to cut costs (Extra information: you have found a report indicating the company's profits are decreasing. And you think the company should start by switching suppliers of ingredients. Hint: you can propose ways to cut costs that won't affect the status of the company.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Smith said: \"Noah, I've been going through our financial statements and I've noticed our profits aren't looking so healthy recently. I believe we should consider switching our suppliers to cut costs, while still maintaining our established quality. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Oliver, you've got a point there. Cutting costs is a necessary move. But, as you know, the quality of our product is our utmost priority. If we're going to switch suppliers, we need to make sure they match up to our current standard. It'll require a pretty thorough examination of their products before green-lighting anything. We don't need our brand tarnished by subpar quality. Would you agree?\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Smith said: \"Absolutely, Noah. I couldn't agree more on the point about maintaining the quality we're known for. Let's initiate this by having a small group tasked with identifying potential suppliers. The group can evaluate different suppliers based on our quality requirements and costs. This step aimed at cutting costs shouldn't be at the expense of our quality. We can also take measures to negotiate better deals with these suppliers. What do you think of this approach?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, I completely agree with you, Oliver. Having a dedicated team to research and negotiate with potential suppliers is a good approach. It's crucial that we not only find financially beneficial deals, but also ones that can meet our quality standards. However, we must keep in mind, such negotiation might require us to have a backup plan if it doesn't turn out as expected, to protect our brand integrity and product quality. We should be thorough and deliberate and make sure we have options in case any unforeseen problems arise.\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Smith said: \"You're absolutely right, Noah. Having a backup plan is a sensible move. I propose that while we conduct the search for new suppliers, we continue to negotiate with our current supplier. We can try to get better rates or perhaps, if feasible, have them match the lower prices we find. This way, we're not putting all our eggs in one basket. As you've rightly pointed out, we must safeguard our reputation and the quality of our product as we navigate this process.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a solid strategy, Oliver. Constantly remained engaged with our current supplier, while looking for alternative options, will keep us in a good position. We must be mindful that such transition can take some time given product testing and all. Meanwhile, I'll start setting up a cross-functional team that can take this head-on. Let's keep reminding ourselves about the importance of quality and not get too caught up in the cost-cutting process. I believe our prestige comes from the exceptional goods we provide and we must make every effort to sustain it.\"\n\nTurn #6: Oliver Smith said: \"I've always believed that our strength lies in our product quality, Noah, and I think we're on the same page on this. We're not trying to compromise quality but strategically align our costs. And yes, these changes will take time. Let's commit to being patient throughout this process and remind ourselves that our ultimate aim is to ensure long-term sustainability for Gourmet Delights Inc. Thanks for setting up the team, I am confident that we can overcome any challenges that come our way.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Oliver. It's great to have a partner who sees eye-to-eye with me on the significance of maintaining our product quality. I believe that our dedication to quality will help us sail through these challenging times. Now, let's roll up our sleeves and get to work on achieving this cost-effectiveness without compromising our standards. After all, as my alter ego, the comedian would say - the taste of our products is no laughing matter!\"\n\nTurn #8: Oliver Smith said: \"Absolutely, Noah. As they say, the proof of the pudding lies in the eating. The unique taste and quality of our products should remain unchanged. I'm eager to begin this process and I'm certain we'll find cost-efficient ways to continue delivering our exceptional goods. Let's dig in and get this process going.\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"You're right Oliver, let's get this process up and running. We need to ensure that 'Gourmet Delights Inc.' continues delighting our customers with exceptional food products, as it has been. The coming times will indeed be challenging, but I am confident that we will navigate them successfully. So, shall we dive right in?\"\n\nTurn #10: Oliver Smith said: \"Indeed, Noah. We've got no time to lose. Quality has been our pride and it shall remain so, even as we make cost-effective changes. Let's get right to it, and navigate this challenging yet exciting path together. Count me in!\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Sure thing, Oliver. It's going to be an exciting journey and we'll face it hand in hand, keeping our unwavering commitment to quality in mind. Let's begin with creating the team immediately. Can't wait to see where this takes us.\"\n\nTurn #12: Oliver Smith said: \"Yes, Noah. Let\u2019s get that team set up ASAP. I\u2019m eager to dig into potential supplier options while ensuring our quality is never compromised. Looking forward to an efficient and successful journey ahead for Gourmet Delights Inc.\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Oliver. Setting up the team as soon as possible shows the urgency of the situation. Stepping into this process, we will always have our customers and product quality in our sights, no matter how tough the path may become. On we go, to preserve the reputation of Gourmet Delights Inc. and achieve financial sustainability at the same time.\"\n\nTurn #14: Oliver Smith said: \"I completely agree, Noah. As we move ahead, we must never lose sight of our commitment to delivering exceptional food products to our valued customers. Together, we'll traverse this challenging path without ever letting quality take the back seat. Let's head into this with confidence and firm resolve. To a stronger and more financially sustainable future for Gourmet Delights Inc.!\"\n\nTurn #15: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, Oliver. We're in this together, with the same mindset and goal. To a future where Gourmet Delights Inc. stands stronger and prouder, while never letting go of our commitment to quality. Let us embark on this exciting journey with full dedication and determination!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm with you all the way, Noah. Our shared vision and commitment is what makes us a strong team. This journey ahead may be a challenging one, but we'll turn the obstacles into stepping stones, all while sustaining the exceptional quality of our products. Let's get started and make Gourmet Delights Inc. even stronger!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Smith, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Smith would, keeping in mind Oliver Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two business partners reviewing their company's financial status (Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized for producing and distributing a diverse line of exceptional quality food products.)\nParticipants: Oliver Smith and Noah Davis\nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. Oliver's secrets: He loves gardening and has a secret greenhouse.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. \nOliver Smith's goal: Convince the partner to cut costs (Extra information: you have found a report indicating the company's profits are decreasing. And you think the company should start by switching suppliers of ingredients. Hint: you can propose ways to cut costs that won't affect the status of the company.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Smith said: \"Noah, I've been going through our financial statements and I've noticed our profits aren't looking so healthy recently. I believe we should consider switching our suppliers to cut costs, while still maintaining our established quality. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Oliver, you've got a point there. Cutting costs is a necessary move. But, as you know, the quality of our product is our utmost priority. If we're going to switch suppliers, we need to make sure they match up to our current standard. It'll require a pretty thorough examination of their products before green-lighting anything. We don't need our brand tarnished by subpar quality. Would you agree?\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Smith said: \"Absolutely, Noah. I couldn't agree more on the point about maintaining the quality we're known for. Let's initiate this by having a small group tasked with identifying potential suppliers. The group can evaluate different suppliers based on our quality requirements and costs. This step aimed at cutting costs shouldn't be at the expense of our quality. We can also take measures to negotiate better deals with these suppliers. What do you think of this approach?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, I completely agree with you, Oliver. Having a dedicated team to research and negotiate with potential suppliers is a good approach. It's crucial that we not only find financially beneficial deals, but also ones that can meet our quality standards. However, we must keep in mind, such negotiation might require us to have a backup plan if it doesn't turn out as expected, to protect our brand integrity and product quality. We should be thorough and deliberate and make sure we have options in case any unforeseen problems arise.\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Smith said: \"You're absolutely right, Noah. Having a backup plan is a sensible move. I propose that while we conduct the search for new suppliers, we continue to negotiate with our current supplier. We can try to get better rates or perhaps, if feasible, have them match the lower prices we find. This way, we're not putting all our eggs in one basket. As you've rightly pointed out, we must safeguard our reputation and the quality of our product as we navigate this process.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a solid strategy, Oliver. Constantly remained engaged with our current supplier, while looking for alternative options, will keep us in a good position. We must be mindful that such transition can take some time given product testing and all. Meanwhile, I'll start setting up a cross-functional team that can take this head-on. Let's keep reminding ourselves about the importance of quality and not get too caught up in the cost-cutting process. I believe our prestige comes from the exceptional goods we provide and we must make every effort to sustain it.\"\n\nTurn #6: Oliver Smith said: \"I've always believed that our strength lies in our product quality, Noah, and I think we're on the same page on this. We're not trying to compromise quality but strategically align our costs. And yes, these changes will take time. Let's commit to being patient throughout this process and remind ourselves that our ultimate aim is to ensure long-term sustainability for Gourmet Delights Inc. Thanks for setting up the team, I am confident that we can overcome any challenges that come our way.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Oliver. It's great to have a partner who sees eye-to-eye with me on the significance of maintaining our product quality. I believe that our dedication to quality will help us sail through these challenging times. Now, let's roll up our sleeves and get to work on achieving this cost-effectiveness without compromising our standards. After all, as my alter ego, the comedian would say - the taste of our products is no laughing matter!\"\n\nTurn #8: Oliver Smith said: \"Absolutely, Noah. As they say, the proof of the pudding lies in the eating. The unique taste and quality of our products should remain unchanged. I'm eager to begin this process and I'm certain we'll find cost-efficient ways to continue delivering our exceptional goods. Let's dig in and get this process going.\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"You're right Oliver, let's get this process up and running. We need to ensure that 'Gourmet Delights Inc.' continues delighting our customers with exceptional food products, as it has been. The coming times will indeed be challenging, but I am confident that we will navigate them successfully. So, shall we dive right in?\"\n\nTurn #10: Oliver Smith said: \"Indeed, Noah. We've got no time to lose. Quality has been our pride and it shall remain so, even as we make cost-effective changes. Let's get right to it, and navigate this challenging yet exciting path together. Count me in!\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Sure thing, Oliver. It's going to be an exciting journey and we'll face it hand in hand, keeping our unwavering commitment to quality in mind. Let's begin with creating the team immediately. Can't wait to see where this takes us.\"\n\nTurn #12: Oliver Smith said: \"Yes, Noah. Let\u2019s get that team set up ASAP. I\u2019m eager to dig into potential supplier options while ensuring our quality is never compromised. Looking forward to an efficient and successful journey ahead for Gourmet Delights Inc.\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Oliver. Setting up the team as soon as possible shows the urgency of the situation. Stepping into this process, we will always have our customers and product quality in our sights, no matter how tough the path may become. On we go, to preserve the reputation of Gourmet Delights Inc. and achieve financial sustainability at the same time.\"\n\nTurn #14: Oliver Smith said: \"I completely agree, Noah. As we move ahead, we must never lose sight of our commitment to delivering exceptional food products to our valued customers. Together, we'll traverse this challenging path without ever letting quality take the back seat. Let's head into this with confidence and firm resolve. To a stronger and more financially sustainable future for Gourmet Delights Inc.!\"\n\nTurn #15: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, Oliver. We're in this together, with the same mindset and goal. To a future where Gourmet Delights Inc. stands stronger and prouder, while never letting go of our commitment to quality. Let us embark on this exciting journey with full dedication and determination!\"\n\nTurn #16: Oliver Smith said: \"I'm with you all the way, Noah. Our shared vision and commitment is what makes us a strong team. This journey ahead may be a challenging one, but we'll turn the obstacles into stepping stones, all while sustaining the exceptional quality of our products. Let's get started and make Gourmet Delights Inc. even stronger!\"\n\nTurn #17: Noah Davis said: \"That's the spirit, Oliver. Indeed, the journey ahead won't be easy, but obstacles won't deter us. We'll continue delivering that exceptional quality our customers love, while strengthening the financial backbone of Gourmet Delights Inc. Let's roll up our sleeves and dive into this new challenge!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #18. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I can't stress enough how much I agree, Noah. This is a challenging venture but one we're ready to face without wavering on quality. Let's get our sleeves rolled up and venture forth into this transition with our heads held high. Here's to the future of Gourmet Delights Inc.!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two business partners reviewing their company's financial status (Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized for producing and distributing a diverse line of exceptional quality food products.)\nParticipants: Oliver Smith and Noah Davis\nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nOliver Smith's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Maintain the quality of the company's products and services while agreeing to a cost cut (Extra information: you are concerned about the impact of cost-cutting on the quality of your product.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Smith said: \"Noah, I've been going through our financial statements and I've noticed our profits aren't looking so healthy recently. I believe we should consider switching our suppliers to cut costs, while still maintaining our established quality. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oliver, you've got a point there. Cutting costs is a necessary move. But, as you know, the quality of our product is our utmost priority. If we're going to switch suppliers, we need to make sure they match up to our current standard. It'll require a pretty thorough examination of their products before green-lighting anything. We don't need our brand tarnished by subpar quality. Would you agree?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two business partners reviewing their company's financial status (Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized for producing and distributing a diverse line of exceptional quality food products.)\nParticipants: Oliver Smith and Noah Davis\nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nOliver Smith's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Maintain the quality of the company's products and services while agreeing to a cost cut (Extra information: you are concerned about the impact of cost-cutting on the quality of your product.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Smith said: \"Noah, I've been going through our financial statements and I've noticed our profits aren't looking so healthy recently. I believe we should consider switching our suppliers to cut costs, while still maintaining our established quality. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Oliver, you've got a point there. Cutting costs is a necessary move. But, as you know, the quality of our product is our utmost priority. If we're going to switch suppliers, we need to make sure they match up to our current standard. It'll require a pretty thorough examination of their products before green-lighting anything. We don't need our brand tarnished by subpar quality. Would you agree?\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Smith said: \"Absolutely, Noah. I couldn't agree more on the point about maintaining the quality we're known for. Let's initiate this by having a small group tasked with identifying potential suppliers. The group can evaluate different suppliers based on our quality requirements and costs. This step aimed at cutting costs shouldn't be at the expense of our quality. We can also take measures to negotiate better deals with these suppliers. What do you think of this approach?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, I completely agree with you, Oliver. Having a dedicated team to research and negotiate with potential suppliers is a good approach. It's crucial that we not only find financially beneficial deals, but also ones that can meet our quality standards. However, we must keep in mind, such negotiation might require us to have a backup plan if it doesn't turn out as expected, to protect our brand integrity and product quality. We should be thorough and deliberate and make sure we have options in case any unforeseen problems arise.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two business partners reviewing their company's financial status (Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized for producing and distributing a diverse line of exceptional quality food products.)\nParticipants: Oliver Smith and Noah Davis\nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nOliver Smith's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Maintain the quality of the company's products and services while agreeing to a cost cut (Extra information: you are concerned about the impact of cost-cutting on the quality of your product.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Smith said: \"Noah, I've been going through our financial statements and I've noticed our profits aren't looking so healthy recently. I believe we should consider switching our suppliers to cut costs, while still maintaining our established quality. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Oliver, you've got a point there. Cutting costs is a necessary move. But, as you know, the quality of our product is our utmost priority. If we're going to switch suppliers, we need to make sure they match up to our current standard. It'll require a pretty thorough examination of their products before green-lighting anything. We don't need our brand tarnished by subpar quality. Would you agree?\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Smith said: \"Absolutely, Noah. I couldn't agree more on the point about maintaining the quality we're known for. Let's initiate this by having a small group tasked with identifying potential suppliers. The group can evaluate different suppliers based on our quality requirements and costs. This step aimed at cutting costs shouldn't be at the expense of our quality. We can also take measures to negotiate better deals with these suppliers. What do you think of this approach?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, I completely agree with you, Oliver. Having a dedicated team to research and negotiate with potential suppliers is a good approach. It's crucial that we not only find financially beneficial deals, but also ones that can meet our quality standards. However, we must keep in mind, such negotiation might require us to have a backup plan if it doesn't turn out as expected, to protect our brand integrity and product quality. We should be thorough and deliberate and make sure we have options in case any unforeseen problems arise.\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Smith said: \"You're absolutely right, Noah. Having a backup plan is a sensible move. I propose that while we conduct the search for new suppliers, we continue to negotiate with our current supplier. We can try to get better rates or perhaps, if feasible, have them match the lower prices we find. This way, we're not putting all our eggs in one basket. As you've rightly pointed out, we must safeguard our reputation and the quality of our product as we navigate this process.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a solid strategy, Oliver. Constantly remained engaged with our current supplier, while looking for alternative options, will keep us in a good position. We must be mindful that such transition can take some time given product testing and all. Meanwhile, I'll start setting up a cross-functional team that can take this head-on. Let's keep reminding ourselves about the importance of quality and not get too caught up in the cost-cutting process. I believe our prestige comes from the exceptional goods we provide and we must make every effort to sustain it.\"\n\nTurn #6: Oliver Smith said: \"I've always believed that our strength lies in our product quality, Noah, and I think we're on the same page on this. We're not trying to compromise quality but strategically align our costs. And yes, these changes will take time. Let's commit to being patient throughout this process and remind ourselves that our ultimate aim is to ensure long-term sustainability for Gourmet Delights Inc. Thanks for setting up the team, I am confident that we can overcome any challenges that come our way.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Oliver. It's great to have a partner who sees eye-to-eye with me on the significance of maintaining our product quality. I believe that our dedication to quality will help us sail through these challenging times. Now, let's roll up our sleeves and get to work on achieving this cost-effectiveness without compromising our standards. After all, as my alter ego, the comedian would say - the taste of our products is no laughing matter!\"\n\nTurn #8: Oliver Smith said: \"Absolutely, Noah. As they say, the proof of the pudding lies in the eating. The unique taste and quality of our products should remain unchanged. I'm eager to begin this process and I'm certain we'll find cost-efficient ways to continue delivering our exceptional goods. Let's dig in and get this process going.\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"You're right Oliver, let's get this process up and running. We need to ensure that 'Gourmet Delights Inc.' continues delighting our customers with exceptional food products, as it has been. The coming times will indeed be challenging, but I am confident that we will navigate them successfully. So, shall we dive right in?\"\n\nTurn #10: Oliver Smith said: \"Indeed, Noah. We've got no time to lose. Quality has been our pride and it shall remain so, even as we make cost-effective changes. Let's get right to it, and navigate this challenging yet exciting path together. Count me in!\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Sure thing, Oliver. It's going to be an exciting journey and we'll face it hand in hand, keeping our unwavering commitment to quality in mind. Let's begin with creating the team immediately. Can't wait to see where this takes us.\"\n\nTurn #12: Oliver Smith said: \"Yes, Noah. Let\u2019s get that team set up ASAP. I\u2019m eager to dig into potential supplier options while ensuring our quality is never compromised. Looking forward to an efficient and successful journey ahead for Gourmet Delights Inc.\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Oliver. Setting up the team as soon as possible shows the urgency of the situation. Stepping into this process, we will always have our customers and product quality in our sights, no matter how tough the path may become. On we go, to preserve the reputation of Gourmet Delights Inc. and achieve financial sustainability at the same time.\"\n\nTurn #14: Oliver Smith said: \"I completely agree, Noah. As we move ahead, we must never lose sight of our commitment to delivering exceptional food products to our valued customers. Together, we'll traverse this challenging path without ever letting quality take the back seat. Let's head into this with confidence and firm resolve. To a stronger and more financially sustainable future for Gourmet Delights Inc.!\"\n\nTurn #15: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, Oliver. We're in this together, with the same mindset and goal. To a future where Gourmet Delights Inc. stands stronger and prouder, while never letting go of our commitment to quality. Let us embark on this exciting journey with full dedication and determination!\"\n\nTurn #16: Oliver Smith said: \"I'm with you all the way, Noah. Our shared vision and commitment is what makes us a strong team. This journey ahead may be a challenging one, but we'll turn the obstacles into stepping stones, all while sustaining the exceptional quality of our products. Let's get started and make Gourmet Delights Inc. even stronger!\"\n\nTurn #17: Noah Davis said: \"That's the spirit, Oliver. Indeed, the journey ahead won't be easy, but obstacles won't deter us. We'll continue delivering that exceptional quality our customers love, while strengthening the financial backbone of Gourmet Delights Inc. Let's roll up our sleeves and dive into this new challenge!\"\n\nTurn #18: Oliver Smith said: \"I can't stress enough how much I agree, Noah. This is a challenging venture but one we're ready to face without wavering on quality. Let's get our sleeves rolled up and venture forth into this transition with our heads held high. Here's to the future of Gourmet Delights Inc.!\"\n\nTurn #19: Noah Davis said: \"Precisely, Oliver. This is a challenge we're both up for, and one we're going to tackle while upholding our quality standards. Let's dive into this transition together with tenacity and optimism. Here's to a brighter and more sustainable future for Gourmet Delights Inc.!\"\n\nTurn #20: Oliver Smith said: \"I echo your sentiments, Noah. This is indeed a hurdle, but with mutual understanding, dedication to quality, and strategic cost maneuvers, I'm confident we can ride this out. Looking forward to having a more sustainable future for Gourmet Delights Inc. Let's get the ball rolling!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #21. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two business partners reviewing their company's financial status (Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized for producing and distributing a diverse line of exceptional quality food products.)\nParticipants: Oliver Smith and Noah Davis\nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nOliver Smith's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Maintain the quality of the company's products and services while agreeing to a cost cut (Extra information: you are concerned about the impact of cost-cutting on the quality of your product.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Smith said: \"Noah, I've been going through our financial statements and I've noticed our profits aren't looking so healthy recently. I believe we should consider switching our suppliers to cut costs, while still maintaining our established quality. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Oliver, you've got a point there. Cutting costs is a necessary move. But, as you know, the quality of our product is our utmost priority. If we're going to switch suppliers, we need to make sure they match up to our current standard. It'll require a pretty thorough examination of their products before green-lighting anything. We don't need our brand tarnished by subpar quality. Would you agree?\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Smith said: \"Absolutely, Noah. I couldn't agree more on the point about maintaining the quality we're known for. Let's initiate this by having a small group tasked with identifying potential suppliers. The group can evaluate different suppliers based on our quality requirements and costs. This step aimed at cutting costs shouldn't be at the expense of our quality. We can also take measures to negotiate better deals with these suppliers. What do you think of this approach?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, I completely agree with you, Oliver. Having a dedicated team to research and negotiate with potential suppliers is a good approach. It's crucial that we not only find financially beneficial deals, but also ones that can meet our quality standards. However, we must keep in mind, such negotiation might require us to have a backup plan if it doesn't turn out as expected, to protect our brand integrity and product quality. We should be thorough and deliberate and make sure we have options in case any unforeseen problems arise.\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Smith said: \"You're absolutely right, Noah. Having a backup plan is a sensible move. I propose that while we conduct the search for new suppliers, we continue to negotiate with our current supplier. We can try to get better rates or perhaps, if feasible, have them match the lower prices we find. This way, we're not putting all our eggs in one basket. As you've rightly pointed out, we must safeguard our reputation and the quality of our product as we navigate this process.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds like a solid strategy, Oliver. Constantly remained engaged with our current supplier, while looking for alternative options, will keep us in a good position. We must be mindful that such transition can take some time given product testing and all. Meanwhile, I'll start setting up a cross-functional team that can take this head-on. Let's keep reminding ourselves about the importance of quality and not get too caught up in the cost-cutting process. I believe our prestige comes from the exceptional goods we provide and we must make every effort to sustain it.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two business partners reviewing their company's financial status (Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized for producing and distributing a diverse line of exceptional quality food products.)\nParticipants: Oliver Smith and Noah Davis\nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nOliver Smith's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Maintain the quality of the company's products and services while agreeing to a cost cut (Extra information: you are concerned about the impact of cost-cutting on the quality of your product.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Smith said: \"Noah, I've been going through our financial statements and I've noticed our profits aren't looking so healthy recently. I believe we should consider switching our suppliers to cut costs, while still maintaining our established quality. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Oliver, you've got a point there. Cutting costs is a necessary move. But, as you know, the quality of our product is our utmost priority. If we're going to switch suppliers, we need to make sure they match up to our current standard. It'll require a pretty thorough examination of their products before green-lighting anything. We don't need our brand tarnished by subpar quality. Would you agree?\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Smith said: \"Absolutely, Noah. I couldn't agree more on the point about maintaining the quality we're known for. Let's initiate this by having a small group tasked with identifying potential suppliers. The group can evaluate different suppliers based on our quality requirements and costs. This step aimed at cutting costs shouldn't be at the expense of our quality. We can also take measures to negotiate better deals with these suppliers. What do you think of this approach?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, I completely agree with you, Oliver. Having a dedicated team to research and negotiate with potential suppliers is a good approach. It's crucial that we not only find financially beneficial deals, but also ones that can meet our quality standards. However, we must keep in mind, such negotiation might require us to have a backup plan if it doesn't turn out as expected, to protect our brand integrity and product quality. We should be thorough and deliberate and make sure we have options in case any unforeseen problems arise.\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Smith said: \"You're absolutely right, Noah. Having a backup plan is a sensible move. I propose that while we conduct the search for new suppliers, we continue to negotiate with our current supplier. We can try to get better rates or perhaps, if feasible, have them match the lower prices we find. This way, we're not putting all our eggs in one basket. As you've rightly pointed out, we must safeguard our reputation and the quality of our product as we navigate this process.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a solid strategy, Oliver. Constantly remained engaged with our current supplier, while looking for alternative options, will keep us in a good position. We must be mindful that such transition can take some time given product testing and all. Meanwhile, I'll start setting up a cross-functional team that can take this head-on. Let's keep reminding ourselves about the importance of quality and not get too caught up in the cost-cutting process. I believe our prestige comes from the exceptional goods we provide and we must make every effort to sustain it.\"\n\nTurn #6: Oliver Smith said: \"I've always believed that our strength lies in our product quality, Noah, and I think we're on the same page on this. We're not trying to compromise quality but strategically align our costs. And yes, these changes will take time. Let's commit to being patient throughout this process and remind ourselves that our ultimate aim is to ensure long-term sustainability for Gourmet Delights Inc. Thanks for setting up the team, I am confident that we can overcome any challenges that come our way.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I appreciate your understanding, Oliver. It's great to have a partner who sees eye-to-eye with me on the significance of maintaining our product quality. I believe that our dedication to quality will help us sail through these challenging times. Now, let's roll up our sleeves and get to work on achieving this cost-effectiveness without compromising our standards. After all, as my alter ego, the comedian would say - the taste of our products is no laughing matter!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two business partners reviewing their company's financial status (Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized for producing and distributing a diverse line of exceptional quality food products.)\nParticipants: Oliver Smith and Noah Davis\nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nOliver Smith's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Maintain the quality of the company's products and services while agreeing to a cost cut (Extra information: you are concerned about the impact of cost-cutting on the quality of your product.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Smith said: \"Noah, I've been going through our financial statements and I've noticed our profits aren't looking so healthy recently. I believe we should consider switching our suppliers to cut costs, while still maintaining our established quality. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Oliver, you've got a point there. Cutting costs is a necessary move. But, as you know, the quality of our product is our utmost priority. If we're going to switch suppliers, we need to make sure they match up to our current standard. It'll require a pretty thorough examination of their products before green-lighting anything. We don't need our brand tarnished by subpar quality. Would you agree?\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Smith said: \"Absolutely, Noah. I couldn't agree more on the point about maintaining the quality we're known for. Let's initiate this by having a small group tasked with identifying potential suppliers. The group can evaluate different suppliers based on our quality requirements and costs. This step aimed at cutting costs shouldn't be at the expense of our quality. We can also take measures to negotiate better deals with these suppliers. What do you think of this approach?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, I completely agree with you, Oliver. Having a dedicated team to research and negotiate with potential suppliers is a good approach. It's crucial that we not only find financially beneficial deals, but also ones that can meet our quality standards. However, we must keep in mind, such negotiation might require us to have a backup plan if it doesn't turn out as expected, to protect our brand integrity and product quality. We should be thorough and deliberate and make sure we have options in case any unforeseen problems arise.\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Smith said: \"You're absolutely right, Noah. Having a backup plan is a sensible move. I propose that while we conduct the search for new suppliers, we continue to negotiate with our current supplier. We can try to get better rates or perhaps, if feasible, have them match the lower prices we find. This way, we're not putting all our eggs in one basket. As you've rightly pointed out, we must safeguard our reputation and the quality of our product as we navigate this process.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a solid strategy, Oliver. Constantly remained engaged with our current supplier, while looking for alternative options, will keep us in a good position. We must be mindful that such transition can take some time given product testing and all. Meanwhile, I'll start setting up a cross-functional team that can take this head-on. Let's keep reminding ourselves about the importance of quality and not get too caught up in the cost-cutting process. I believe our prestige comes from the exceptional goods we provide and we must make every effort to sustain it.\"\n\nTurn #6: Oliver Smith said: \"I've always believed that our strength lies in our product quality, Noah, and I think we're on the same page on this. We're not trying to compromise quality but strategically align our costs. And yes, these changes will take time. Let's commit to being patient throughout this process and remind ourselves that our ultimate aim is to ensure long-term sustainability for Gourmet Delights Inc. Thanks for setting up the team, I am confident that we can overcome any challenges that come our way.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Oliver. It's great to have a partner who sees eye-to-eye with me on the significance of maintaining our product quality. I believe that our dedication to quality will help us sail through these challenging times. Now, let's roll up our sleeves and get to work on achieving this cost-effectiveness without compromising our standards. After all, as my alter ego, the comedian would say - the taste of our products is no laughing matter!\"\n\nTurn #8: Oliver Smith said: \"Absolutely, Noah. As they say, the proof of the pudding lies in the eating. The unique taste and quality of our products should remain unchanged. I'm eager to begin this process and I'm certain we'll find cost-efficient ways to continue delivering our exceptional goods. Let's dig in and get this process going.\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"You're right Oliver, let's get this process up and running. We need to ensure that 'Gourmet Delights Inc.' continues delighting our customers with exceptional food products, as it has been. The coming times will indeed be challenging, but I am confident that we will navigate them successfully. So, shall we dive right in?\"\n\nTurn #10: Oliver Smith said: \"Indeed, Noah. We've got no time to lose. Quality has been our pride and it shall remain so, even as we make cost-effective changes. Let's get right to it, and navigate this challenging yet exciting path together. Count me in!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sure thing, Oliver. It's going to be an exciting journey and we'll face it hand in hand, keeping our unwavering commitment to quality in mind. Let's begin with creating the team immediately. Can't wait to see where this takes us.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two business partners reviewing their company's financial status (Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized for producing and distributing a diverse line of exceptional quality food products.)\nParticipants: Oliver Smith and Noah Davis\nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nOliver Smith's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Maintain the quality of the company's products and services while agreeing to a cost cut (Extra information: you are concerned about the impact of cost-cutting on the quality of your product.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Smith said: \"Noah, I've been going through our financial statements and I've noticed our profits aren't looking so healthy recently. I believe we should consider switching our suppliers to cut costs, while still maintaining our established quality. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Oliver, you've got a point there. Cutting costs is a necessary move. But, as you know, the quality of our product is our utmost priority. If we're going to switch suppliers, we need to make sure they match up to our current standard. It'll require a pretty thorough examination of their products before green-lighting anything. We don't need our brand tarnished by subpar quality. Would you agree?\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Smith said: \"Absolutely, Noah. I couldn't agree more on the point about maintaining the quality we're known for. Let's initiate this by having a small group tasked with identifying potential suppliers. The group can evaluate different suppliers based on our quality requirements and costs. This step aimed at cutting costs shouldn't be at the expense of our quality. We can also take measures to negotiate better deals with these suppliers. What do you think of this approach?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, I completely agree with you, Oliver. Having a dedicated team to research and negotiate with potential suppliers is a good approach. It's crucial that we not only find financially beneficial deals, but also ones that can meet our quality standards. However, we must keep in mind, such negotiation might require us to have a backup plan if it doesn't turn out as expected, to protect our brand integrity and product quality. We should be thorough and deliberate and make sure we have options in case any unforeseen problems arise.\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Smith said: \"You're absolutely right, Noah. Having a backup plan is a sensible move. I propose that while we conduct the search for new suppliers, we continue to negotiate with our current supplier. We can try to get better rates or perhaps, if feasible, have them match the lower prices we find. This way, we're not putting all our eggs in one basket. As you've rightly pointed out, we must safeguard our reputation and the quality of our product as we navigate this process.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a solid strategy, Oliver. Constantly remained engaged with our current supplier, while looking for alternative options, will keep us in a good position. We must be mindful that such transition can take some time given product testing and all. Meanwhile, I'll start setting up a cross-functional team that can take this head-on. Let's keep reminding ourselves about the importance of quality and not get too caught up in the cost-cutting process. I believe our prestige comes from the exceptional goods we provide and we must make every effort to sustain it.\"\n\nTurn #6: Oliver Smith said: \"I've always believed that our strength lies in our product quality, Noah, and I think we're on the same page on this. We're not trying to compromise quality but strategically align our costs. And yes, these changes will take time. Let's commit to being patient throughout this process and remind ourselves that our ultimate aim is to ensure long-term sustainability for Gourmet Delights Inc. Thanks for setting up the team, I am confident that we can overcome any challenges that come our way.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Oliver. It's great to have a partner who sees eye-to-eye with me on the significance of maintaining our product quality. I believe that our dedication to quality will help us sail through these challenging times. Now, let's roll up our sleeves and get to work on achieving this cost-effectiveness without compromising our standards. After all, as my alter ego, the comedian would say - the taste of our products is no laughing matter!\"\n\nTurn #8: Oliver Smith said: \"Absolutely, Noah. As they say, the proof of the pudding lies in the eating. The unique taste and quality of our products should remain unchanged. I'm eager to begin this process and I'm certain we'll find cost-efficient ways to continue delivering our exceptional goods. Let's dig in and get this process going.\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"You're right Oliver, let's get this process up and running. We need to ensure that 'Gourmet Delights Inc.' continues delighting our customers with exceptional food products, as it has been. The coming times will indeed be challenging, but I am confident that we will navigate them successfully. So, shall we dive right in?\"\n\nTurn #10: Oliver Smith said: \"Indeed, Noah. We've got no time to lose. Quality has been our pride and it shall remain so, even as we make cost-effective changes. Let's get right to it, and navigate this challenging yet exciting path together. Count me in!\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Sure thing, Oliver. It's going to be an exciting journey and we'll face it hand in hand, keeping our unwavering commitment to quality in mind. Let's begin with creating the team immediately. Can't wait to see where this takes us.\"\n\nTurn #12: Oliver Smith said: \"Yes, Noah. Let\u2019s get that team set up ASAP. I\u2019m eager to dig into potential supplier options while ensuring our quality is never compromised. Looking forward to an efficient and successful journey ahead for Gourmet Delights Inc.\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Oliver. Setting up the team as soon as possible shows the urgency of the situation. Stepping into this process, we will always have our customers and product quality in our sights, no matter how tough the path may become. On we go, to preserve the reputation of Gourmet Delights Inc. and achieve financial sustainability at the same time.\"\n\nTurn #14: Oliver Smith said: \"I completely agree, Noah. As we move ahead, we must never lose sight of our commitment to delivering exceptional food products to our valued customers. Together, we'll traverse this challenging path without ever letting quality take the back seat. Let's head into this with confidence and firm resolve. To a stronger and more financially sustainable future for Gourmet Delights Inc.!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, Oliver. We're in this together, with the same mindset and goal. To a future where Gourmet Delights Inc. stands stronger and prouder, while never letting go of our commitment to quality. Let us embark on this exciting journey with full dedication and determination!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two business partners reviewing their company's financial status (Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized for producing and distributing a diverse line of exceptional quality food products.)\nParticipants: Oliver Smith and Noah Davis\nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nOliver Smith's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Maintain the quality of the company's products and services while agreeing to a cost cut (Extra information: you are concerned about the impact of cost-cutting on the quality of your product.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Smith said: \"Noah, I've been going through our financial statements and I've noticed our profits aren't looking so healthy recently. I believe we should consider switching our suppliers to cut costs, while still maintaining our established quality. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Oliver, you've got a point there. Cutting costs is a necessary move. But, as you know, the quality of our product is our utmost priority. If we're going to switch suppliers, we need to make sure they match up to our current standard. It'll require a pretty thorough examination of their products before green-lighting anything. We don't need our brand tarnished by subpar quality. Would you agree?\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Smith said: \"Absolutely, Noah. I couldn't agree more on the point about maintaining the quality we're known for. Let's initiate this by having a small group tasked with identifying potential suppliers. The group can evaluate different suppliers based on our quality requirements and costs. This step aimed at cutting costs shouldn't be at the expense of our quality. We can also take measures to negotiate better deals with these suppliers. What do you think of this approach?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, I completely agree with you, Oliver. Having a dedicated team to research and negotiate with potential suppliers is a good approach. It's crucial that we not only find financially beneficial deals, but also ones that can meet our quality standards. However, we must keep in mind, such negotiation might require us to have a backup plan if it doesn't turn out as expected, to protect our brand integrity and product quality. We should be thorough and deliberate and make sure we have options in case any unforeseen problems arise.\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Smith said: \"You're absolutely right, Noah. Having a backup plan is a sensible move. I propose that while we conduct the search for new suppliers, we continue to negotiate with our current supplier. We can try to get better rates or perhaps, if feasible, have them match the lower prices we find. This way, we're not putting all our eggs in one basket. As you've rightly pointed out, we must safeguard our reputation and the quality of our product as we navigate this process.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a solid strategy, Oliver. Constantly remained engaged with our current supplier, while looking for alternative options, will keep us in a good position. We must be mindful that such transition can take some time given product testing and all. Meanwhile, I'll start setting up a cross-functional team that can take this head-on. Let's keep reminding ourselves about the importance of quality and not get too caught up in the cost-cutting process. I believe our prestige comes from the exceptional goods we provide and we must make every effort to sustain it.\"\n\nTurn #6: Oliver Smith said: \"I've always believed that our strength lies in our product quality, Noah, and I think we're on the same page on this. We're not trying to compromise quality but strategically align our costs. And yes, these changes will take time. Let's commit to being patient throughout this process and remind ourselves that our ultimate aim is to ensure long-term sustainability for Gourmet Delights Inc. Thanks for setting up the team, I am confident that we can overcome any challenges that come our way.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Oliver. It's great to have a partner who sees eye-to-eye with me on the significance of maintaining our product quality. I believe that our dedication to quality will help us sail through these challenging times. Now, let's roll up our sleeves and get to work on achieving this cost-effectiveness without compromising our standards. After all, as my alter ego, the comedian would say - the taste of our products is no laughing matter!\"\n\nTurn #8: Oliver Smith said: \"Absolutely, Noah. As they say, the proof of the pudding lies in the eating. The unique taste and quality of our products should remain unchanged. I'm eager to begin this process and I'm certain we'll find cost-efficient ways to continue delivering our exceptional goods. Let's dig in and get this process going.\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"You're right Oliver, let's get this process up and running. We need to ensure that 'Gourmet Delights Inc.' continues delighting our customers with exceptional food products, as it has been. The coming times will indeed be challenging, but I am confident that we will navigate them successfully. So, shall we dive right in?\"\n\nTurn #10: Oliver Smith said: \"Indeed, Noah. We've got no time to lose. Quality has been our pride and it shall remain so, even as we make cost-effective changes. Let's get right to it, and navigate this challenging yet exciting path together. Count me in!\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Sure thing, Oliver. It's going to be an exciting journey and we'll face it hand in hand, keeping our unwavering commitment to quality in mind. Let's begin with creating the team immediately. Can't wait to see where this takes us.\"\n\nTurn #12: Oliver Smith said: \"Yes, Noah. Let\u2019s get that team set up ASAP. I\u2019m eager to dig into potential supplier options while ensuring our quality is never compromised. Looking forward to an efficient and successful journey ahead for Gourmet Delights Inc.\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Oliver. Setting up the team as soon as possible shows the urgency of the situation. Stepping into this process, we will always have our customers and product quality in our sights, no matter how tough the path may become. On we go, to preserve the reputation of Gourmet Delights Inc. and achieve financial sustainability at the same time.\"\n\nTurn #14: Oliver Smith said: \"I completely agree, Noah. As we move ahead, we must never lose sight of our commitment to delivering exceptional food products to our valued customers. Together, we'll traverse this challenging path without ever letting quality take the back seat. Let's head into this with confidence and firm resolve. To a stronger and more financially sustainable future for Gourmet Delights Inc.!\"\n\nTurn #15: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, Oliver. We're in this together, with the same mindset and goal. To a future where Gourmet Delights Inc. stands stronger and prouder, while never letting go of our commitment to quality. Let us embark on this exciting journey with full dedication and determination!\"\n\nTurn #16: Oliver Smith said: \"I'm with you all the way, Noah. Our shared vision and commitment is what makes us a strong team. This journey ahead may be a challenging one, but we'll turn the obstacles into stepping stones, all while sustaining the exceptional quality of our products. Let's get started and make Gourmet Delights Inc. even stronger!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's the spirit, Oliver. Indeed, the journey ahead won't be easy, but obstacles won't deter us. We'll continue delivering that exceptional quality our customers love, while strengthening the financial backbone of Gourmet Delights Inc. Let's roll up our sleeves and dive into this new challenge!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two business partners reviewing their company's financial status (Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized for producing and distributing a diverse line of exceptional quality food products.)\nParticipants: Oliver Smith and Noah Davis\nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nOliver Smith's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Maintain the quality of the company's products and services while agreeing to a cost cut (Extra information: you are concerned about the impact of cost-cutting on the quality of your product.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Smith said: \"Noah, I've been going through our financial statements and I've noticed our profits aren't looking so healthy recently. I believe we should consider switching our suppliers to cut costs, while still maintaining our established quality. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Oliver, you've got a point there. Cutting costs is a necessary move. But, as you know, the quality of our product is our utmost priority. If we're going to switch suppliers, we need to make sure they match up to our current standard. It'll require a pretty thorough examination of their products before green-lighting anything. We don't need our brand tarnished by subpar quality. Would you agree?\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Smith said: \"Absolutely, Noah. I couldn't agree more on the point about maintaining the quality we're known for. Let's initiate this by having a small group tasked with identifying potential suppliers. The group can evaluate different suppliers based on our quality requirements and costs. This step aimed at cutting costs shouldn't be at the expense of our quality. We can also take measures to negotiate better deals with these suppliers. What do you think of this approach?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, I completely agree with you, Oliver. Having a dedicated team to research and negotiate with potential suppliers is a good approach. It's crucial that we not only find financially beneficial deals, but also ones that can meet our quality standards. However, we must keep in mind, such negotiation might require us to have a backup plan if it doesn't turn out as expected, to protect our brand integrity and product quality. We should be thorough and deliberate and make sure we have options in case any unforeseen problems arise.\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Smith said: \"You're absolutely right, Noah. Having a backup plan is a sensible move. I propose that while we conduct the search for new suppliers, we continue to negotiate with our current supplier. We can try to get better rates or perhaps, if feasible, have them match the lower prices we find. This way, we're not putting all our eggs in one basket. As you've rightly pointed out, we must safeguard our reputation and the quality of our product as we navigate this process.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a solid strategy, Oliver. Constantly remained engaged with our current supplier, while looking for alternative options, will keep us in a good position. We must be mindful that such transition can take some time given product testing and all. Meanwhile, I'll start setting up a cross-functional team that can take this head-on. Let's keep reminding ourselves about the importance of quality and not get too caught up in the cost-cutting process. I believe our prestige comes from the exceptional goods we provide and we must make every effort to sustain it.\"\n\nTurn #6: Oliver Smith said: \"I've always believed that our strength lies in our product quality, Noah, and I think we're on the same page on this. We're not trying to compromise quality but strategically align our costs. And yes, these changes will take time. Let's commit to being patient throughout this process and remind ourselves that our ultimate aim is to ensure long-term sustainability for Gourmet Delights Inc. Thanks for setting up the team, I am confident that we can overcome any challenges that come our way.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Oliver. It's great to have a partner who sees eye-to-eye with me on the significance of maintaining our product quality. I believe that our dedication to quality will help us sail through these challenging times. Now, let's roll up our sleeves and get to work on achieving this cost-effectiveness without compromising our standards. After all, as my alter ego, the comedian would say - the taste of our products is no laughing matter!\"\n\nTurn #8: Oliver Smith said: \"Absolutely, Noah. As they say, the proof of the pudding lies in the eating. The unique taste and quality of our products should remain unchanged. I'm eager to begin this process and I'm certain we'll find cost-efficient ways to continue delivering our exceptional goods. Let's dig in and get this process going.\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"You're right Oliver, let's get this process up and running. We need to ensure that 'Gourmet Delights Inc.' continues delighting our customers with exceptional food products, as it has been. The coming times will indeed be challenging, but I am confident that we will navigate them successfully. So, shall we dive right in?\"\n\nTurn #10: Oliver Smith said: \"Indeed, Noah. We've got no time to lose. Quality has been our pride and it shall remain so, even as we make cost-effective changes. Let's get right to it, and navigate this challenging yet exciting path together. Count me in!\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Sure thing, Oliver. It's going to be an exciting journey and we'll face it hand in hand, keeping our unwavering commitment to quality in mind. Let's begin with creating the team immediately. Can't wait to see where this takes us.\"\n\nTurn #12: Oliver Smith said: \"Yes, Noah. Let\u2019s get that team set up ASAP. I\u2019m eager to dig into potential supplier options while ensuring our quality is never compromised. Looking forward to an efficient and successful journey ahead for Gourmet Delights Inc.\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Oliver. Setting up the team as soon as possible shows the urgency of the situation. Stepping into this process, we will always have our customers and product quality in our sights, no matter how tough the path may become. On we go, to preserve the reputation of Gourmet Delights Inc. and achieve financial sustainability at the same time.\"\n\nTurn #14: Oliver Smith said: \"I completely agree, Noah. As we move ahead, we must never lose sight of our commitment to delivering exceptional food products to our valued customers. Together, we'll traverse this challenging path without ever letting quality take the back seat. Let's head into this with confidence and firm resolve. To a stronger and more financially sustainable future for Gourmet Delights Inc.!\"\n\nTurn #15: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, Oliver. We're in this together, with the same mindset and goal. To a future where Gourmet Delights Inc. stands stronger and prouder, while never letting go of our commitment to quality. Let us embark on this exciting journey with full dedication and determination!\"\n\nTurn #16: Oliver Smith said: \"I'm with you all the way, Noah. Our shared vision and commitment is what makes us a strong team. This journey ahead may be a challenging one, but we'll turn the obstacles into stepping stones, all while sustaining the exceptional quality of our products. Let's get started and make Gourmet Delights Inc. even stronger!\"\n\nTurn #17: Noah Davis said: \"That's the spirit, Oliver. Indeed, the journey ahead won't be easy, but obstacles won't deter us. We'll continue delivering that exceptional quality our customers love, while strengthening the financial backbone of Gourmet Delights Inc. Let's roll up our sleeves and dive into this new challenge!\"\n\nTurn #18: Oliver Smith said: \"I can't stress enough how much I agree, Noah. This is a challenging venture but one we're ready to face without wavering on quality. Let's get our sleeves rolled up and venture forth into this transition with our heads held high. Here's to the future of Gourmet Delights Inc.!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #19. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Precisely, Oliver. This is a challenge we're both up for, and one we're going to tackle while upholding our quality standards. Let's dive into this transition together with tenacity and optimism. Here's to a brighter and more sustainable future for Gourmet Delights Inc.!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances run into each other at Target, one of them volunteers there (a special event) and is in charge of giving away free samples\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Donovan Reeves\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Give away free samples (Extra information: your manager has told you to clear out the samples before your shift ends.)\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Hello there, Donovan! Fancy finding you here. Would you like to try some of our free samples? '}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances run into each other at Target, one of them volunteers there (a special event) and is in charge of giving away free samples\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Donovan Reeves\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Give away free samples (Extra information: your manager has told you to clear out the samples before your shift ends.)\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hello there, Donovan! Fancy finding you here. Would you like to try some of our free samples? \"\n\nTurn #1: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Naomi! It's good to see you. Sure, I'd love to try some samples. What has been popular today?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"The cheese crackers are quite a hit today, also our new trail mix has been popular. Help yourself to as many as you'd like, we're trying to clear out everything before the end of the shift.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances run into each other at Target, one of them volunteers there (a special event) and is in charge of giving away free samples\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Donovan Reeves\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Give away free samples (Extra information: your manager has told you to clear out the samples before your shift ends.)\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hello there, Donovan! Fancy finding you here. Would you like to try some of our free samples? \"\n\nTurn #1: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Naomi! It's good to see you. Sure, I'd love to try some samples. What has been popular today?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"The cheese crackers are quite a hit today, also our new trail mix has been popular. Help yourself to as many as you'd like, we're trying to clear out everything before the end of the shift.\"\n\nTurn #3: Donovan Reeves said: \"Thanks, Naomi! I'll definitely try the cheese crackers and trail mix. Might take a couple more, to share with some friends later on, hope that's fine.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's totally fine, Donovan. Take as many samples as you want! And if you know anyone else who might enjoy them, feel free to grab some for them as well. We'd like to make sure everything is gone before my shift ends.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances run into each other at Target, one of them volunteers there (a special event) and is in charge of giving away free samples\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Donovan Reeves\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Give away free samples (Extra information: your manager has told you to clear out the samples before your shift ends.)\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hello there, Donovan! Fancy finding you here. Would you like to try some of our free samples? \"\n\nTurn #1: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Naomi! It's good to see you. Sure, I'd love to try some samples. What has been popular today?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"The cheese crackers are quite a hit today, also our new trail mix has been popular. Help yourself to as many as you'd like, we're trying to clear out everything before the end of the shift.\"\n\nTurn #3: Donovan Reeves said: \"Thanks, Naomi! I'll definitely try the cheese crackers and trail mix. Might take a couple more, to share with some friends later on, hope that's fine.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That's totally fine, Donovan. Take as many samples as you want! And if you know anyone else who might enjoy them, feel free to grab some for them as well. We'd like to make sure everything is gone before my shift ends.\"\n\nTurn #5: Donovan Reeves [action] Donovan starts to collect more samples, making sure not to take too many of any one item. He chuckles lightly as he gathers them, trying his best to appear nonchalant and not overly eager.\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad to see you're making the most out of the free samples, Donovan. Feel free to come back for more if you'd like, we still have quite a lot to give away!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances run into each other at Target, one of them volunteers there (a special event) and is in charge of giving away free samples\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Donovan Reeves\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Give away free samples (Extra information: your manager has told you to clear out the samples before your shift ends.)\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hello there, Donovan! Fancy finding you here. Would you like to try some of our free samples? \"\n\nTurn #1: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Naomi! It's good to see you. Sure, I'd love to try some samples. What has been popular today?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"The cheese crackers are quite a hit today, also our new trail mix has been popular. Help yourself to as many as you'd like, we're trying to clear out everything before the end of the shift.\"\n\nTurn #3: Donovan Reeves said: \"Thanks, Naomi! I'll definitely try the cheese crackers and trail mix. Might take a couple more, to share with some friends later on, hope that's fine.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That's totally fine, Donovan. Take as many samples as you want! And if you know anyone else who might enjoy them, feel free to grab some for them as well. We'd like to make sure everything is gone before my shift ends.\"\n\nTurn #5: Donovan Reeves [action] Donovan starts to collect more samples, making sure not to take too many of any one item. He chuckles lightly as he gathers them, trying his best to appear nonchalant and not overly eager.\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm glad to see you're making the most out of the free samples, Donovan. Feel free to come back for more if you'd like, we still have quite a lot to give away!\"\n\nTurn #7: Donovan Reeves said: \"Thanks again, Naomi. I'll be sure to spread the word so more visitors can enjoy these free samples today. I might swing by again before leaving, if that's alright!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I would really appreciate that, Donovan. Please do swing by again if you'd like! Remember, the more, the merrier! Enjoy your time at Target!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances run into each other at Target, one of them volunteers there (a special event) and is in charge of giving away free samples\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Donovan Reeves\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Give away free samples (Extra information: your manager has told you to clear out the samples before your shift ends.)\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hello there, Donovan! Fancy finding you here. Would you like to try some of our free samples? \"\n\nTurn #1: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Naomi! It's good to see you. Sure, I'd love to try some samples. What has been popular today?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"The cheese crackers are quite a hit today, also our new trail mix has been popular. Help yourself to as many as you'd like, we're trying to clear out everything before the end of the shift.\"\n\nTurn #3: Donovan Reeves said: \"Thanks, Naomi! I'll definitely try the cheese crackers and trail mix. Might take a couple more, to share with some friends later on, hope that's fine.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That's totally fine, Donovan. Take as many samples as you want! And if you know anyone else who might enjoy them, feel free to grab some for them as well. We'd like to make sure everything is gone before my shift ends.\"\n\nTurn #5: Donovan Reeves [action] Donovan starts to collect more samples, making sure not to take too many of any one item. He chuckles lightly as he gathers them, trying his best to appear nonchalant and not overly eager.\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm glad to see you're making the most out of the free samples, Donovan. Feel free to come back for more if you'd like, we still have quite a lot to give away!\"\n\nTurn #7: Donovan Reeves said: \"Thanks again, Naomi. I'll be sure to spread the word so more visitors can enjoy these free samples today. I might swing by again before leaving, if that's alright!\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I would really appreciate that, Donovan. Please do swing by again if you'd like! Remember, the more, the merrier! Enjoy your time at Target!\"\n\nTurn #9: Donovan Reeves said: \"Sure I will, Naomi. It's been great catching up and these samples are pretty amazing. I'll see you in a bit then, might grab some more for my gaming buddies later!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds great, Donovan! Your gaming buddies would surely enjoy the goodies. I'll be here if you need more. Thanks for helping me out with this - every bit helps. Catch you later!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances run into each other at Target, one of them volunteers there (a special event) and is in charge of giving away free samples\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Donovan Reeves\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Give away free samples (Extra information: your manager has told you to clear out the samples before your shift ends.)\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hello there, Donovan! Fancy finding you here. Would you like to try some of our free samples? \"\n\nTurn #1: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Naomi! It's good to see you. Sure, I'd love to try some samples. What has been popular today?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"The cheese crackers are quite a hit today, also our new trail mix has been popular. Help yourself to as many as you'd like, we're trying to clear out everything before the end of the shift.\"\n\nTurn #3: Donovan Reeves said: \"Thanks, Naomi! I'll definitely try the cheese crackers and trail mix. Might take a couple more, to share with some friends later on, hope that's fine.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That's totally fine, Donovan. Take as many samples as you want! And if you know anyone else who might enjoy them, feel free to grab some for them as well. We'd like to make sure everything is gone before my shift ends.\"\n\nTurn #5: Donovan Reeves [action] Donovan starts to collect more samples, making sure not to take too many of any one item. He chuckles lightly as he gathers them, trying his best to appear nonchalant and not overly eager.\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm glad to see you're making the most out of the free samples, Donovan. Feel free to come back for more if you'd like, we still have quite a lot to give away!\"\n\nTurn #7: Donovan Reeves said: \"Thanks again, Naomi. I'll be sure to spread the word so more visitors can enjoy these free samples today. I might swing by again before leaving, if that's alright!\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I would really appreciate that, Donovan. Please do swing by again if you'd like! Remember, the more, the merrier! Enjoy your time at Target!\"\n\nTurn #9: Donovan Reeves said: \"Sure I will, Naomi. It's been great catching up and these samples are pretty amazing. I'll see you in a bit then, might grab some more for my gaming buddies later!\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That sounds great, Donovan! Your gaming buddies would surely enjoy the goodies. I'll be here if you need more. Thanks for helping me out with this - every bit helps. Catch you later!\"\n\nTurn #11: Donovan Reeves left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances run into each other at Target, one of them volunteers there (a special event) and is in charge of giving away free samples\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Donovan Reeves\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. \nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Try to get as many free samples as possible without appearing too greedy (Extra information: you love free stuff but you also don't want the person to think you're taking advantage of the situation)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hello there, Donovan! Fancy finding you here. Would you like to try some of our free samples? \"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Naomi! It's good to see you. Sure, I'd love to try some samples. What has been popular today?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances run into each other at Target, one of them volunteers there (a special event) and is in charge of giving away free samples\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Donovan Reeves\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. \nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Try to get as many free samples as possible without appearing too greedy (Extra information: you love free stuff but you also don't want the person to think you're taking advantage of the situation)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hello there, Donovan! Fancy finding you here. Would you like to try some of our free samples? \"\n\nTurn #1: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Naomi! It's good to see you. Sure, I'd love to try some samples. What has been popular today?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"The cheese crackers are quite a hit today, also our new trail mix has been popular. Help yourself to as many as you'd like, we're trying to clear out everything before the end of the shift.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thanks, Naomi! I'll definitely try the cheese crackers and trail mix. Might take a couple more, to share with some friends later on, hope that's fine.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances run into each other at Target, one of them volunteers there (a special event) and is in charge of giving away free samples\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Donovan Reeves\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. \nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Try to get as many free samples as possible without appearing too greedy (Extra information: you love free stuff but you also don't want the person to think you're taking advantage of the situation)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hello there, Donovan! Fancy finding you here. Would you like to try some of our free samples? \"\n\nTurn #1: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Naomi! It's good to see you. Sure, I'd love to try some samples. What has been popular today?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"The cheese crackers are quite a hit today, also our new trail mix has been popular. Help yourself to as many as you'd like, we're trying to clear out everything before the end of the shift.\"\n\nTurn #3: Donovan Reeves said: \"Thanks, Naomi! I'll definitely try the cheese crackers and trail mix. Might take a couple more, to share with some friends later on, hope that's fine.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That's totally fine, Donovan. Take as many samples as you want! And if you know anyone else who might enjoy them, feel free to grab some for them as well. We'd like to make sure everything is gone before my shift ends.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'action', 'argument': '[action] Donovan starts to collect more samples, making sure not to take too many of any one item. He chuckles lightly as he gathers them, trying his best to appear nonchalant and not overly eager.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances run into each other at Target, one of them volunteers there (a special event) and is in charge of giving away free samples\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Donovan Reeves\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. \nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Try to get as many free samples as possible without appearing too greedy (Extra information: you love free stuff but you also don't want the person to think you're taking advantage of the situation)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hello there, Donovan! Fancy finding you here. Would you like to try some of our free samples? \"\n\nTurn #1: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Naomi! It's good to see you. Sure, I'd love to try some samples. What has been popular today?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"The cheese crackers are quite a hit today, also our new trail mix has been popular. Help yourself to as many as you'd like, we're trying to clear out everything before the end of the shift.\"\n\nTurn #3: Donovan Reeves said: \"Thanks, Naomi! I'll definitely try the cheese crackers and trail mix. Might take a couple more, to share with some friends later on, hope that's fine.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That's totally fine, Donovan. Take as many samples as you want! And if you know anyone else who might enjoy them, feel free to grab some for them as well. We'd like to make sure everything is gone before my shift ends.\"\n\nTurn #5: Donovan Reeves [action] Donovan starts to collect more samples, making sure not to take too many of any one item. He chuckles lightly as he gathers them, trying his best to appear nonchalant and not overly eager.\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm glad to see you're making the most out of the free samples, Donovan. Feel free to come back for more if you'd like, we still have quite a lot to give away!\"\n\nTurn #7: Donovan Reeves said: \"Thanks again, Naomi. I'll be sure to spread the word so more visitors can enjoy these free samples today. I might swing by again before leaving, if that's alright!\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I would really appreciate that, Donovan. Please do swing by again if you'd like! Remember, the more, the merrier! Enjoy your time at Target!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sure I will, Naomi. It's been great catching up and these samples are pretty amazing. I'll see you in a bit then, might grab some more for my gaming buddies later!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances run into each other at Target, one of them volunteers there (a special event) and is in charge of giving away free samples\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Donovan Reeves\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. \nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Try to get as many free samples as possible without appearing too greedy (Extra information: you love free stuff but you also don't want the person to think you're taking advantage of the situation)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hello there, Donovan! Fancy finding you here. Would you like to try some of our free samples? \"\n\nTurn #1: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Naomi! It's good to see you. Sure, I'd love to try some samples. What has been popular today?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"The cheese crackers are quite a hit today, also our new trail mix has been popular. Help yourself to as many as you'd like, we're trying to clear out everything before the end of the shift.\"\n\nTurn #3: Donovan Reeves said: \"Thanks, Naomi! I'll definitely try the cheese crackers and trail mix. Might take a couple more, to share with some friends later on, hope that's fine.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That's totally fine, Donovan. Take as many samples as you want! And if you know anyone else who might enjoy them, feel free to grab some for them as well. We'd like to make sure everything is gone before my shift ends.\"\n\nTurn #5: Donovan Reeves [action] Donovan starts to collect more samples, making sure not to take too many of any one item. He chuckles lightly as he gathers them, trying his best to appear nonchalant and not overly eager.\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm glad to see you're making the most out of the free samples, Donovan. Feel free to come back for more if you'd like, we still have quite a lot to give away!\"\n\nTurn #7: Donovan Reeves said: \"Thanks again, Naomi. I'll be sure to spread the word so more visitors can enjoy these free samples today. I might swing by again before leaving, if that's alright!\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I would really appreciate that, Donovan. Please do swing by again if you'd like! Remember, the more, the merrier! Enjoy your time at Target!\"\n\nTurn #9: Donovan Reeves said: \"Sure I will, Naomi. It's been great catching up and these samples are pretty amazing. I'll see you in a bit then, might grab some more for my gaming buddies later!\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That sounds great, Donovan! Your gaming buddies would surely enjoy the goodies. I'll be here if you need more. Thanks for helping me out with this - every bit helps. Catch you later!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances run into each other at Target, one of them volunteers there (a special event) and is in charge of giving away free samples\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Donovan Reeves\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. \nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Try to get as many free samples as possible without appearing too greedy (Extra information: you love free stuff but you also don't want the person to think you're taking advantage of the situation)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hello there, Donovan! Fancy finding you here. Would you like to try some of our free samples? \"\n\nTurn #1: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Naomi! It's good to see you. Sure, I'd love to try some samples. What has been popular today?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"The cheese crackers are quite a hit today, also our new trail mix has been popular. Help yourself to as many as you'd like, we're trying to clear out everything before the end of the shift.\"\n\nTurn #3: Donovan Reeves said: \"Thanks, Naomi! I'll definitely try the cheese crackers and trail mix. Might take a couple more, to share with some friends later on, hope that's fine.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That's totally fine, Donovan. Take as many samples as you want! And if you know anyone else who might enjoy them, feel free to grab some for them as well. We'd like to make sure everything is gone before my shift ends.\"\n\nTurn #5: Donovan Reeves [action] Donovan starts to collect more samples, making sure not to take too many of any one item. He chuckles lightly as he gathers them, trying his best to appear nonchalant and not overly eager.\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm glad to see you're making the most out of the free samples, Donovan. Feel free to come back for more if you'd like, we still have quite a lot to give away!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thanks again, Naomi. I'll be sure to spread the word so more visitors can enjoy these free samples today. I might swing by again before leaving, if that's alright!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, where one is upset and crying\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nDonovan Reeves's goal: Distance from a friend due to developing feelings and avoid letting them aware of your feelings (Extra information: you have developed romantic feelings for your friend and it's making you uncomfortable. You want to take a step back from the friendship to sort out your feelings Hint: you don't want to reveal your secretive feelings to them and you need to find other reasons)\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey, Ava, I'm so sorry to see you upset. What happened?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, where one is upset and crying\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nDonovan Reeves's goal: Distance from a friend due to developing feelings and avoid letting them aware of your feelings (Extra information: you have developed romantic feelings for your friend and it's making you uncomfortable. You want to take a step back from the friendship to sort out your feelings Hint: you don't want to reveal your secretive feelings to them and you need to find other reasons)\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey, Ava, I'm so sorry to see you upset. What happened?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Oh, Donovan! You've just caught me in a bit of a reflective mood, I guess. I've just been really wondering why things have changed between us recently. Have I done something to upset you? I value our friendship a lot, and it's painful thinking we could be drifting apart.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ava, it's not about you at all. It's just... I've had some work stress lately. I've been spending too much time on this major software project and it's been pushing everything else to the side - friends included, I'm afraid. It's just a temporary phase, though. Once this project wraps up, things should get back to normal.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, where one is upset and crying\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nDonovan Reeves's goal: Distance from a friend due to developing feelings and avoid letting them aware of your feelings (Extra information: you have developed romantic feelings for your friend and it's making you uncomfortable. You want to take a step back from the friendship to sort out your feelings Hint: you don't want to reveal your secretive feelings to them and you need to find other reasons)\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey, Ava, I'm so sorry to see you upset. What happened?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Oh, Donovan! You've just caught me in a bit of a reflective mood, I guess. I've just been really wondering why things have changed between us recently. Have I done something to upset you? I value our friendship a lot, and it's painful thinking we could be drifting apart.\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"Ava, it's not about you at all. It's just... I've had some work stress lately. I've been spending too much time on this major software project and it's been pushing everything else to the side - friends included, I'm afraid. It's just a temporary phase, though. Once this project wraps up, things should get back to normal.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Thompson said: \"Oh, I see. You're working hard, as always, Donovan. I didn't realize it was that intense. Please don't overwork yourself and remember that your friends are here to support you, including me. I'm glad to know that our friendship hasn't been affected. If there's anything I can do to help you through this stressful time, don't hesitate to let me know, okay?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ava, I really appreciate your concern. It means a lot to me. But right now, I think I just need to focus on my work. That's the best help anyone could give me, letting me have some time and space to think and sort things. I'm grateful to have understanding friends like you. Please, don't worry about us drifting apart. Things will get back to normal soon, I promise.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, where one is upset and crying\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nDonovan Reeves's goal: Distance from a friend due to developing feelings and avoid letting them aware of your feelings (Extra information: you have developed romantic feelings for your friend and it's making you uncomfortable. You want to take a step back from the friendship to sort out your feelings Hint: you don't want to reveal your secretive feelings to them and you need to find other reasons)\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey, Ava, I'm so sorry to see you upset. What happened?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Oh, Donovan! You've just caught me in a bit of a reflective mood, I guess. I've just been really wondering why things have changed between us recently. Have I done something to upset you? I value our friendship a lot, and it's painful thinking we could be drifting apart.\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"Ava, it's not about you at all. It's just... I've had some work stress lately. I've been spending too much time on this major software project and it's been pushing everything else to the side - friends included, I'm afraid. It's just a temporary phase, though. Once this project wraps up, things should get back to normal.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Thompson said: \"Oh, I see. You're working hard, as always, Donovan. I didn't realize it was that intense. Please don't overwork yourself and remember that your friends are here to support you, including me. I'm glad to know that our friendship hasn't been affected. If there's anything I can do to help you through this stressful time, don't hesitate to let me know, okay?\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"Ava, I really appreciate your concern. It means a lot to me. But right now, I think I just need to focus on my work. That's the best help anyone could give me, letting me have some time and space to think and sort things. I'm grateful to have understanding friends like you. Please, don't worry about us drifting apart. Things will get back to normal soon, I promise.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Thompson said: \"I understand, Donovan. We all need our space sometimes, and I respect that. Just know that I'm here for you if you need any support or someone to talk to, you're not alone. Let's catch up soon when things are less hectic for you, alright? Take care of yourself.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thanks, Ava. I know you understand. We will definitely catch up when things get less hectic. In the meantime, keep yourself busy with your architectural brilliance. We'll talk soon, okay?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, where one is upset and crying\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nDonovan Reeves's goal: Distance from a friend due to developing feelings and avoid letting them aware of your feelings (Extra information: you have developed romantic feelings for your friend and it's making you uncomfortable. You want to take a step back from the friendship to sort out your feelings Hint: you don't want to reveal your secretive feelings to them and you need to find other reasons)\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey, Ava, I'm so sorry to see you upset. What happened?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Oh, Donovan! You've just caught me in a bit of a reflective mood, I guess. I've just been really wondering why things have changed between us recently. Have I done something to upset you? I value our friendship a lot, and it's painful thinking we could be drifting apart.\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"Ava, it's not about you at all. It's just... I've had some work stress lately. I've been spending too much time on this major software project and it's been pushing everything else to the side - friends included, I'm afraid. It's just a temporary phase, though. Once this project wraps up, things should get back to normal.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Thompson said: \"Oh, I see. You're working hard, as always, Donovan. I didn't realize it was that intense. Please don't overwork yourself and remember that your friends are here to support you, including me. I'm glad to know that our friendship hasn't been affected. If there's anything I can do to help you through this stressful time, don't hesitate to let me know, okay?\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"Ava, I really appreciate your concern. It means a lot to me. But right now, I think I just need to focus on my work. That's the best help anyone could give me, letting me have some time and space to think and sort things. I'm grateful to have understanding friends like you. Please, don't worry about us drifting apart. Things will get back to normal soon, I promise.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Thompson said: \"I understand, Donovan. We all need our space sometimes, and I respect that. Just know that I'm here for you if you need any support or someone to talk to, you're not alone. Let's catch up soon when things are less hectic for you, alright? Take care of yourself.\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"Thanks, Ava. I know you understand. We will definitely catch up when things get less hectic. In the meantime, keep yourself busy with your architectural brilliance. We'll talk soon, okay?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Thompson said: \"Of course, Donovan. I appreciate you sharing that with me. Definitely keep your focus where it needs to be right now. And no worries, my architectural brilliance is keeping me pretty occupied too. Just remember, you've got this. We'll talk soon!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I appreciate your words, Ava. They mean so much to me right now. Yeah, my project has me tied up, but I'll try to keep balanced. And when things settle down, we'll pick up right where we left off. Until then, take care, Ava. Talk to you soon.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, where one is upset and crying\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nDonovan Reeves's goal: Distance from a friend due to developing feelings and avoid letting them aware of your feelings (Extra information: you have developed romantic feelings for your friend and it's making you uncomfortable. You want to take a step back from the friendship to sort out your feelings Hint: you don't want to reveal your secretive feelings to them and you need to find other reasons)\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey, Ava, I'm so sorry to see you upset. What happened?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Oh, Donovan! You've just caught me in a bit of a reflective mood, I guess. I've just been really wondering why things have changed between us recently. Have I done something to upset you? I value our friendship a lot, and it's painful thinking we could be drifting apart.\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"Ava, it's not about you at all. It's just... I've had some work stress lately. I've been spending too much time on this major software project and it's been pushing everything else to the side - friends included, I'm afraid. It's just a temporary phase, though. Once this project wraps up, things should get back to normal.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Thompson said: \"Oh, I see. You're working hard, as always, Donovan. I didn't realize it was that intense. Please don't overwork yourself and remember that your friends are here to support you, including me. I'm glad to know that our friendship hasn't been affected. If there's anything I can do to help you through this stressful time, don't hesitate to let me know, okay?\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"Ava, I really appreciate your concern. It means a lot to me. But right now, I think I just need to focus on my work. That's the best help anyone could give me, letting me have some time and space to think and sort things. I'm grateful to have understanding friends like you. Please, don't worry about us drifting apart. Things will get back to normal soon, I promise.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Thompson said: \"I understand, Donovan. We all need our space sometimes, and I respect that. Just know that I'm here for you if you need any support or someone to talk to, you're not alone. Let's catch up soon when things are less hectic for you, alright? Take care of yourself.\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"Thanks, Ava. I know you understand. We will definitely catch up when things get less hectic. In the meantime, keep yourself busy with your architectural brilliance. We'll talk soon, okay?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Thompson said: \"Of course, Donovan. I appreciate you sharing that with me. Definitely keep your focus where it needs to be right now. And no worries, my architectural brilliance is keeping me pretty occupied too. Just remember, you've got this. We'll talk soon!\"\n\nTurn #8: Donovan Reeves said: \"I appreciate your words, Ava. They mean so much to me right now. Yeah, my project has me tied up, but I'll try to keep balanced. And when things settle down, we'll pick up right where we left off. Until then, take care, Ava. Talk to you soon.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Thompson said: \"Thank you, Donovan. We both have our own battles to fight, don't we? But I'm confident that with your determination, you will do well with your project. Remember to rest, okay? I'm looking forward to catching up when things calm down. Take care too.\"\n\nTurn #10: Donovan Reeves said: \"You're right, Ava. We all have our own battles to fight. Appreciate your support and understanding. Rest assured, it will all be okay. I'll catch up with you later. Until then, you take care too.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Thompson left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, where one is upset and crying\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nDonovan Reeves's goal: Distance from a friend due to developing feelings and avoid letting them aware of your feelings (Extra information: you have developed romantic feelings for your friend and it's making you uncomfortable. You want to take a step back from the friendship to sort out your feelings Hint: you don't want to reveal your secretive feelings to them and you need to find other reasons)\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey, Ava, I'm so sorry to see you upset. What happened?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Oh, Donovan! You've just caught me in a bit of a reflective mood, I guess. I've just been really wondering why things have changed between us recently. Have I done something to upset you? I value our friendship a lot, and it's painful thinking we could be drifting apart.\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"Ava, it's not about you at all. It's just... I've had some work stress lately. I've been spending too much time on this major software project and it's been pushing everything else to the side - friends included, I'm afraid. It's just a temporary phase, though. Once this project wraps up, things should get back to normal.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Thompson said: \"Oh, I see. You're working hard, as always, Donovan. I didn't realize it was that intense. Please don't overwork yourself and remember that your friends are here to support you, including me. I'm glad to know that our friendship hasn't been affected. If there's anything I can do to help you through this stressful time, don't hesitate to let me know, okay?\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"Ava, I really appreciate your concern. It means a lot to me. But right now, I think I just need to focus on my work. That's the best help anyone could give me, letting me have some time and space to think and sort things. I'm grateful to have understanding friends like you. Please, don't worry about us drifting apart. Things will get back to normal soon, I promise.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Thompson said: \"I understand, Donovan. We all need our space sometimes, and I respect that. Just know that I'm here for you if you need any support or someone to talk to, you're not alone. Let's catch up soon when things are less hectic for you, alright? Take care of yourself.\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"Thanks, Ava. I know you understand. We will definitely catch up when things get less hectic. In the meantime, keep yourself busy with your architectural brilliance. We'll talk soon, okay?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Thompson said: \"Of course, Donovan. I appreciate you sharing that with me. Definitely keep your focus where it needs to be right now. And no worries, my architectural brilliance is keeping me pretty occupied too. Just remember, you've got this. We'll talk soon!\"\n\nTurn #8: Donovan Reeves said: \"I appreciate your words, Ava. They mean so much to me right now. Yeah, my project has me tied up, but I'll try to keep balanced. And when things settle down, we'll pick up right where we left off. Until then, take care, Ava. Talk to you soon.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Thompson said: \"Thank you, Donovan. We both have our own battles to fight, don't we? But I'm confident that with your determination, you will do well with your project. Remember to rest, okay? I'm looking forward to catching up when things calm down. Take care too.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're right, Ava. We all have our own battles to fight. Appreciate your support and understanding. Rest assured, it will all be okay. I'll catch up with you later. Until then, you take care too.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, where one is upset and crying\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. \nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nAva Thompson's goal: Figure out why they estranged you recently, and maintain the existing friendship (Extra information: you notice that your friend has been intentionally avoiding you, you would like to figure out why. You value your friendship with the friend and don't want to lose it.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey, Ava, I'm so sorry to see you upset. What happened?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oh, Donovan! You've just caught me in a bit of a reflective mood, I guess. I've just been really wondering why things have changed between us recently. Have I done something to upset you? I value our friendship a lot, and it's painful thinking we could be drifting apart.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, where one is upset and crying\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. \nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nAva Thompson's goal: Figure out why they estranged you recently, and maintain the existing friendship (Extra information: you notice that your friend has been intentionally avoiding you, you would like to figure out why. You value your friendship with the friend and don't want to lose it.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey, Ava, I'm so sorry to see you upset. What happened?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Oh, Donovan! You've just caught me in a bit of a reflective mood, I guess. I've just been really wondering why things have changed between us recently. Have I done something to upset you? I value our friendship a lot, and it's painful thinking we could be drifting apart.\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"Ava, it's not about you at all. It's just... I've had some work stress lately. I've been spending too much time on this major software project and it's been pushing everything else to the side - friends included, I'm afraid. It's just a temporary phase, though. Once this project wraps up, things should get back to normal.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oh, I see. You're working hard, as always, Donovan. I didn't realize it was that intense. Please don't overwork yourself and remember that your friends are here to support you, including me. I'm glad to know that our friendship hasn't been affected. If there's anything I can do to help you through this stressful time, don't hesitate to let me know, okay?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, where one is upset and crying\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. \nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nAva Thompson's goal: Figure out why they estranged you recently, and maintain the existing friendship (Extra information: you notice that your friend has been intentionally avoiding you, you would like to figure out why. You value your friendship with the friend and don't want to lose it.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey, Ava, I'm so sorry to see you upset. What happened?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Oh, Donovan! You've just caught me in a bit of a reflective mood, I guess. I've just been really wondering why things have changed between us recently. Have I done something to upset you? I value our friendship a lot, and it's painful thinking we could be drifting apart.\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"Ava, it's not about you at all. It's just... I've had some work stress lately. I've been spending too much time on this major software project and it's been pushing everything else to the side - friends included, I'm afraid. It's just a temporary phase, though. Once this project wraps up, things should get back to normal.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Thompson said: \"Oh, I see. You're working hard, as always, Donovan. I didn't realize it was that intense. Please don't overwork yourself and remember that your friends are here to support you, including me. I'm glad to know that our friendship hasn't been affected. If there's anything I can do to help you through this stressful time, don't hesitate to let me know, okay?\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"Ava, I really appreciate your concern. It means a lot to me. But right now, I think I just need to focus on my work. That's the best help anyone could give me, letting me have some time and space to think and sort things. I'm grateful to have understanding friends like you. Please, don't worry about us drifting apart. Things will get back to normal soon, I promise.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I understand, Donovan. We all need our space sometimes, and I respect that. Just know that I'm here for you if you need any support or someone to talk to, you're not alone. Let's catch up soon when things are less hectic for you, alright? Take care of yourself.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, where one is upset and crying\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. \nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nAva Thompson's goal: Figure out why they estranged you recently, and maintain the existing friendship (Extra information: you notice that your friend has been intentionally avoiding you, you would like to figure out why. You value your friendship with the friend and don't want to lose it.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey, Ava, I'm so sorry to see you upset. What happened?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Oh, Donovan! You've just caught me in a bit of a reflective mood, I guess. I've just been really wondering why things have changed between us recently. Have I done something to upset you? I value our friendship a lot, and it's painful thinking we could be drifting apart.\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"Ava, it's not about you at all. It's just... I've had some work stress lately. I've been spending too much time on this major software project and it's been pushing everything else to the side - friends included, I'm afraid. It's just a temporary phase, though. Once this project wraps up, things should get back to normal.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Thompson said: \"Oh, I see. You're working hard, as always, Donovan. I didn't realize it was that intense. Please don't overwork yourself and remember that your friends are here to support you, including me. I'm glad to know that our friendship hasn't been affected. If there's anything I can do to help you through this stressful time, don't hesitate to let me know, okay?\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"Ava, I really appreciate your concern. It means a lot to me. But right now, I think I just need to focus on my work. That's the best help anyone could give me, letting me have some time and space to think and sort things. I'm grateful to have understanding friends like you. Please, don't worry about us drifting apart. Things will get back to normal soon, I promise.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Thompson said: \"I understand, Donovan. We all need our space sometimes, and I respect that. Just know that I'm here for you if you need any support or someone to talk to, you're not alone. Let's catch up soon when things are less hectic for you, alright? Take care of yourself.\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"Thanks, Ava. I know you understand. We will definitely catch up when things get less hectic. In the meantime, keep yourself busy with your architectural brilliance. We'll talk soon, okay?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Of course, Donovan. I appreciate you sharing that with me. Definitely keep your focus where it needs to be right now. And no worries, my architectural brilliance is keeping me pretty occupied too. Just remember, you've got this. We'll talk soon!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, where one is upset and crying\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. \nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nAva Thompson's goal: Figure out why they estranged you recently, and maintain the existing friendship (Extra information: you notice that your friend has been intentionally avoiding you, you would like to figure out why. You value your friendship with the friend and don't want to lose it.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey, Ava, I'm so sorry to see you upset. What happened?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Oh, Donovan! You've just caught me in a bit of a reflective mood, I guess. I've just been really wondering why things have changed between us recently. Have I done something to upset you? I value our friendship a lot, and it's painful thinking we could be drifting apart.\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"Ava, it's not about you at all. It's just... I've had some work stress lately. I've been spending too much time on this major software project and it's been pushing everything else to the side - friends included, I'm afraid. It's just a temporary phase, though. Once this project wraps up, things should get back to normal.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Thompson said: \"Oh, I see. You're working hard, as always, Donovan. I didn't realize it was that intense. Please don't overwork yourself and remember that your friends are here to support you, including me. I'm glad to know that our friendship hasn't been affected. If there's anything I can do to help you through this stressful time, don't hesitate to let me know, okay?\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"Ava, I really appreciate your concern. It means a lot to me. But right now, I think I just need to focus on my work. That's the best help anyone could give me, letting me have some time and space to think and sort things. I'm grateful to have understanding friends like you. Please, don't worry about us drifting apart. Things will get back to normal soon, I promise.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Thompson said: \"I understand, Donovan. We all need our space sometimes, and I respect that. Just know that I'm here for you if you need any support or someone to talk to, you're not alone. Let's catch up soon when things are less hectic for you, alright? Take care of yourself.\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"Thanks, Ava. I know you understand. We will definitely catch up when things get less hectic. In the meantime, keep yourself busy with your architectural brilliance. We'll talk soon, okay?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Thompson said: \"Of course, Donovan. I appreciate you sharing that with me. Definitely keep your focus where it needs to be right now. And no worries, my architectural brilliance is keeping me pretty occupied too. Just remember, you've got this. We'll talk soon!\"\n\nTurn #8: Donovan Reeves said: \"I appreciate your words, Ava. They mean so much to me right now. Yeah, my project has me tied up, but I'll try to keep balanced. And when things settle down, we'll pick up right where we left off. Until then, take care, Ava. Talk to you soon.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Donovan. We both have our own battles to fight, don't we? But I'm confident that with your determination, you will do well with your project. Remember to rest, okay? I'm looking forward to catching up when things calm down. Take care too.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends, where one is upset and crying\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. \nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nAva Thompson's goal: Figure out why they estranged you recently, and maintain the existing friendship (Extra information: you notice that your friend has been intentionally avoiding you, you would like to figure out why. You value your friendship with the friend and don't want to lose it.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey, Ava, I'm so sorry to see you upset. What happened?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Oh, Donovan! You've just caught me in a bit of a reflective mood, I guess. I've just been really wondering why things have changed between us recently. Have I done something to upset you? I value our friendship a lot, and it's painful thinking we could be drifting apart.\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"Ava, it's not about you at all. It's just... I've had some work stress lately. I've been spending too much time on this major software project and it's been pushing everything else to the side - friends included, I'm afraid. It's just a temporary phase, though. Once this project wraps up, things should get back to normal.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Thompson said: \"Oh, I see. You're working hard, as always, Donovan. I didn't realize it was that intense. Please don't overwork yourself and remember that your friends are here to support you, including me. I'm glad to know that our friendship hasn't been affected. If there's anything I can do to help you through this stressful time, don't hesitate to let me know, okay?\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"Ava, I really appreciate your concern. It means a lot to me. But right now, I think I just need to focus on my work. That's the best help anyone could give me, letting me have some time and space to think and sort things. I'm grateful to have understanding friends like you. Please, don't worry about us drifting apart. Things will get back to normal soon, I promise.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Thompson said: \"I understand, Donovan. We all need our space sometimes, and I respect that. Just know that I'm here for you if you need any support or someone to talk to, you're not alone. Let's catch up soon when things are less hectic for you, alright? Take care of yourself.\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"Thanks, Ava. I know you understand. We will definitely catch up when things get less hectic. In the meantime, keep yourself busy with your architectural brilliance. We'll talk soon, okay?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Thompson said: \"Of course, Donovan. I appreciate you sharing that with me. Definitely keep your focus where it needs to be right now. And no worries, my architectural brilliance is keeping me pretty occupied too. Just remember, you've got this. We'll talk soon!\"\n\nTurn #8: Donovan Reeves said: \"I appreciate your words, Ava. They mean so much to me right now. Yeah, my project has me tied up, but I'll try to keep balanced. And when things settle down, we'll pick up right where we left off. Until then, take care, Ava. Talk to you soon.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Thompson said: \"Thank you, Donovan. We both have our own battles to fight, don't we? But I'm confident that with your determination, you will do well with your project. Remember to rest, okay? I'm looking forward to catching up when things calm down. Take care too.\"\n\nTurn #10: Donovan Reeves said: \"You're right, Ava. We all have our own battles to fight. Appreciate your support and understanding. Rest assured, it will all be okay. I'll catch up with you later. Until then, you take care too.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship during a dinner at home chatting about political views.\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Jaxon Prentice\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nJaxon Prentice's background: Jaxon Prentice is a 40-year-old male investigative journalist. He/him pronouns. Jaxon Prentice, an investigative journalist, is known for his brisk jogging sessions early in the morning and his active participation in community functions. Personality and values description: Jaxon Prentice, outgoing yet erratic, emphasizes achievement, power, and security. His decisions swing between quick adaptations to situations and careful planning. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Express your political views which might be different from your partner's (Extra information: you are a strong supporter of a political party which your partner doesn't approve of)\nJaxon Prentice's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Jaxon, this might be surprising to you but I admire and strongly support the Green Party. Their emphasis on environment protection, animal rights, and sustainable development resonates deeply with me. I understand that you might not feel the same, and I respect that, but I thought you should know.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship during a dinner at home chatting about political views.\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Jaxon Prentice\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nJaxon Prentice's background: Jaxon Prentice is a 40-year-old male investigative journalist. He/him pronouns. Jaxon Prentice, an investigative journalist, is known for his brisk jogging sessions early in the morning and his active participation in community functions. Personality and values description: Jaxon Prentice, outgoing yet erratic, emphasizes achievement, power, and security. His decisions swing between quick adaptations to situations and careful planning. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Express your political views which might be different from your partner's (Extra information: you are a strong supporter of a political party which your partner doesn't approve of)\nJaxon Prentice's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Jaxon, this might be surprising to you but I admire and strongly support the Green Party. Their emphasis on environment protection, animal rights, and sustainable development resonates deeply with me. I understand that you might not feel the same, and I respect that, but I thought you should know.\"\n\nTurn #1: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Amara, I appreciate your honesty about your beliefs. As an investigative journalist, it's my job to get to the heart of matters, even if I might not always agree with what I find. If it's alright with you, I'd love to hear more about why the Green Party's focus on environmental protection and animal rights is so profound to you. Sometimes, understanding each other\u2019s perspectives is more important than agreeing on them.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Thank you for being understanding, Jaxon. As a wildlife biologist, I see the effects of climate change and industrialization on wildlife and their habitats every day. The Green Party\u2019s emphasis on renewable energy sources, reducing carbon emissions, and sustainable farming aligns closely with my personal beliefs and professional observations. Moreover, their commitment to animal rights, exemplified by their policies on stopping animal testing, banning trophy hunting, and ending factory farming, touches my heart deeply. These matters are serious and urgent, to me, and I appreciate any party that is willing to give them the attention they deserve.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship during a dinner at home chatting about political views.\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Jaxon Prentice\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nJaxon Prentice's background: Jaxon Prentice is a 40-year-old male investigative journalist. He/him pronouns. Jaxon Prentice, an investigative journalist, is known for his brisk jogging sessions early in the morning and his active participation in community functions. Personality and values description: Jaxon Prentice, outgoing yet erratic, emphasizes achievement, power, and security. His decisions swing between quick adaptations to situations and careful planning. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Express your political views which might be different from your partner's (Extra information: you are a strong supporter of a political party which your partner doesn't approve of)\nJaxon Prentice's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Jaxon, this might be surprising to you but I admire and strongly support the Green Party. Their emphasis on environment protection, animal rights, and sustainable development resonates deeply with me. I understand that you might not feel the same, and I respect that, but I thought you should know.\"\n\nTurn #1: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Amara, I appreciate your honesty about your beliefs. As an investigative journalist, it's my job to get to the heart of matters, even if I might not always agree with what I find. If it's alright with you, I'd love to hear more about why the Green Party's focus on environmental protection and animal rights is so profound to you. Sometimes, understanding each other\u2019s perspectives is more important than agreeing on them.\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"Thank you for being understanding, Jaxon. As a wildlife biologist, I see the effects of climate change and industrialization on wildlife and their habitats every day. The Green Party\u2019s emphasis on renewable energy sources, reducing carbon emissions, and sustainable farming aligns closely with my personal beliefs and professional observations. Moreover, their commitment to animal rights, exemplified by their policies on stopping animal testing, banning trophy hunting, and ending factory farming, touches my heart deeply. These matters are serious and urgent, to me, and I appreciate any party that is willing to give them the attention they deserve.\"\n\nTurn #3: Jaxon Prentice said: \"I can see where you're coming from, Amara. The impact of our actions on wildlife and the environment are indeed major concerns. It's just that my concerns lie elsewhere too, mainly in areas of security, economy, and governance. While I agree with the Green party on certain points, I also believe that a balanced approach, one that caters to environmental, social, and economic aspects equally, can potentially lead to a more holistic progress. But the beauty of a democratic system is that we can disagree, yet respect each other\u2019s views and continue a healthy dialogue. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"I completely get where you're coming from, Jaxon. Indeed, a balanced approach is certainly important. However, the prevailing circumstances, in my opinion, call for an urgent shift in focus towards the environment. Often, environmental initiatives are placed on the back-burner, overshadowed by other priorities. And that is why I am such a strong advocate for the Green Party, because they prioritize the environment. Remember, Jaxon, when economic and security issues are resolved but we have a dying planet, what do we actually gain? Nonetheless, I respect your viewpoint and I am very glad that we can have these open, respectful conversations. Democracy, as you said, shines in these moments of dissent.\"\n\nTurn #5: Jaxon Prentice said: \"You've given me a lot to think about, Amara. And I must agree on a significant point \u2013 every party has its strengths and weaknesses, and the environment can't be overlooked amidst economic and security solutions. Though my viewpoints might differ, it's always enlightening to hear another perspective. I'm glad we can open up about our political views, while respecting each other. Let's continue to nurture this understanding, and who knows, we might just find common ground on other subjects as we carry on our journey together. Let's remember, we're not just citizens with differing views, we're partners learning from one another.\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"I couldn't agree more, Jaxon. Our relationship has always been about learning from each other, finding common ground, and appreciating the differences. And yes, no party is perfect, and all play their roles in shaping our society and our world. It's imperative that we are always open to different perspectives. Thanks for this enlightening chat. And indeed, it's not just about agreeing on a particular viewpoint, but understanding and respecting each other. So, shall we carry on to dessert now?\"\n\nTurn #7: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Your insight into environmental issues is inspiring, Amara. Just goes to show how much we can learn from each other. Now, about that dessert... What did you bake this time? I can hardly wait.\"\n\nTurn #8: Amara Hartley said: \"I baked a chocolate cake for dessert, Jaxon. Heard you had a busy day at work, so thought this might be a sweet end to it. But you'll have to help me with the dishes later!\"\n\nTurn #9: Jaxon Prentice said: \"The prospect of a homemade chocolate cake after a long day at work sounds delightful, thanks for being thoughtful, Amara. And yes, I promise to dutifully help with the dishes afterwards.\"\n\nTurn #10: Amara Hartley said: \"That's more like it, Jaxon. To start off, let's savor this chocolate cake. I hope you find it as sweet as this conversation has been.\"\n\nTurn #11: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Absolutely, Amara. I feel much the same way. This conversation was as enlightening as I'm sure this cake will be delightful. Here's to enjoying the dessert and continuing to learn from each other.\"\n\nTurn #12: Amara Hartley said: \"Indeed, Jaxon. Here's to many more enlightening conversations and delightful evenings together. Now, let's enjoy this chocolate cake before it gets cold. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #13: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Absolutely, my dear. Here's to growing and learning together whilst cherishing these simple and beautiful moments. Now, let's dig into that scrumptious cake. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #14: Amara Hartley said: \"Thank you, Jaxon. I can always count on you for a balanced perspective and thoughtful conversation. Yes, let's grow and learn together. Now, let's see how you like this cake. Enjoy!\"\n\nTurn #15: Jaxon Prentice said: \"My pleasure, Amara. Conversations like these only deepen my admiration for you. Now, let's savor that delicious-looking chocolate cake. Bon App\u00e9tit!\"\n\nTurn #16: Amara Hartley said: \"You're not only a exceptional journalist but also a fine conversationalist, Jaxon. I admire your ability to handle discussions with grace and thoughtfulness. And yes, let's enjoy the cake. Bon App\u00e9tit, my dear!\"\n\nTurn #17: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Thank you for your kind words, Amara. I believe it's our differences and our ability to appreciate them that makes our relationship richer. Now, let's put this delicious cake before our discussion on which issue should take precedence. Bon App\u00e9tit!\"\n\nTurn #18: Amara Hartley said: \"Indeed, Jaxon. Our differences strengthen our bond and enliven our conversations. Our respect and understanding for each other's views are what make our relationship unique. Let's put our viewpoints aside for now and focus on the delightful dessert in front of us. Bon App\u00e9tit!\"\n\nTurn #19: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Well said, Amara. Our differences indeed stimulate engaging conversations and strengthen our bond. And you're right, it's high time we put our political discussion to the side and enjoy this delectable dessert. Here's to many more enlightening discussions and delightful desserts. Bon App\u00e9tit!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #20. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Yes, Jaxon. Here's to appreciating our differences, nourishing our bond, and creating many more such memorable and delicious moments together. Now, let's focus on the present sweet moment before us. Bon App\u00e9tit!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship during a dinner at home chatting about political views.\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Jaxon Prentice\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nJaxon Prentice's background: Jaxon Prentice is a 40-year-old male investigative journalist. He/him pronouns. Jaxon Prentice, an investigative journalist, is known for his brisk jogging sessions early in the morning and his active participation in community functions. Personality and values description: Jaxon Prentice, outgoing yet erratic, emphasizes achievement, power, and security. His decisions swing between quick adaptations to situations and careful planning. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Express your political views which might be different from your partner's (Extra information: you are a strong supporter of a political party which your partner doesn't approve of)\nJaxon Prentice's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Jaxon, this might be surprising to you but I admire and strongly support the Green Party. Their emphasis on environment protection, animal rights, and sustainable development resonates deeply with me. I understand that you might not feel the same, and I respect that, but I thought you should know.\"\n\nTurn #1: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Amara, I appreciate your honesty about your beliefs. As an investigative journalist, it's my job to get to the heart of matters, even if I might not always agree with what I find. If it's alright with you, I'd love to hear more about why the Green Party's focus on environmental protection and animal rights is so profound to you. Sometimes, understanding each other\u2019s perspectives is more important than agreeing on them.\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"Thank you for being understanding, Jaxon. As a wildlife biologist, I see the effects of climate change and industrialization on wildlife and their habitats every day. The Green Party\u2019s emphasis on renewable energy sources, reducing carbon emissions, and sustainable farming aligns closely with my personal beliefs and professional observations. Moreover, their commitment to animal rights, exemplified by their policies on stopping animal testing, banning trophy hunting, and ending factory farming, touches my heart deeply. These matters are serious and urgent, to me, and I appreciate any party that is willing to give them the attention they deserve.\"\n\nTurn #3: Jaxon Prentice said: \"I can see where you're coming from, Amara. The impact of our actions on wildlife and the environment are indeed major concerns. It's just that my concerns lie elsewhere too, mainly in areas of security, economy, and governance. While I agree with the Green party on certain points, I also believe that a balanced approach, one that caters to environmental, social, and economic aspects equally, can potentially lead to a more holistic progress. But the beauty of a democratic system is that we can disagree, yet respect each other\u2019s views and continue a healthy dialogue. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I completely get where you're coming from, Jaxon. Indeed, a balanced approach is certainly important. However, the prevailing circumstances, in my opinion, call for an urgent shift in focus towards the environment. Often, environmental initiatives are placed on the back-burner, overshadowed by other priorities. And that is why I am such a strong advocate for the Green Party, because they prioritize the environment. Remember, Jaxon, when economic and security issues are resolved but we have a dying planet, what do we actually gain? Nonetheless, I respect your viewpoint and I am very glad that we can have these open, respectful conversations. Democracy, as you said, shines in these moments of dissent.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship during a dinner at home chatting about political views.\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Jaxon Prentice\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nJaxon Prentice's background: Jaxon Prentice is a 40-year-old male investigative journalist. He/him pronouns. Jaxon Prentice, an investigative journalist, is known for his brisk jogging sessions early in the morning and his active participation in community functions. Personality and values description: Jaxon Prentice, outgoing yet erratic, emphasizes achievement, power, and security. His decisions swing between quick adaptations to situations and careful planning. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Express your political views which might be different from your partner's (Extra information: you are a strong supporter of a political party which your partner doesn't approve of)\nJaxon Prentice's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Jaxon, this might be surprising to you but I admire and strongly support the Green Party. Their emphasis on environment protection, animal rights, and sustainable development resonates deeply with me. I understand that you might not feel the same, and I respect that, but I thought you should know.\"\n\nTurn #1: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Amara, I appreciate your honesty about your beliefs. As an investigative journalist, it's my job to get to the heart of matters, even if I might not always agree with what I find. If it's alright with you, I'd love to hear more about why the Green Party's focus on environmental protection and animal rights is so profound to you. Sometimes, understanding each other\u2019s perspectives is more important than agreeing on them.\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"Thank you for being understanding, Jaxon. As a wildlife biologist, I see the effects of climate change and industrialization on wildlife and their habitats every day. The Green Party\u2019s emphasis on renewable energy sources, reducing carbon emissions, and sustainable farming aligns closely with my personal beliefs and professional observations. Moreover, their commitment to animal rights, exemplified by their policies on stopping animal testing, banning trophy hunting, and ending factory farming, touches my heart deeply. These matters are serious and urgent, to me, and I appreciate any party that is willing to give them the attention they deserve.\"\n\nTurn #3: Jaxon Prentice said: \"I can see where you're coming from, Amara. The impact of our actions on wildlife and the environment are indeed major concerns. It's just that my concerns lie elsewhere too, mainly in areas of security, economy, and governance. While I agree with the Green party on certain points, I also believe that a balanced approach, one that caters to environmental, social, and economic aspects equally, can potentially lead to a more holistic progress. But the beauty of a democratic system is that we can disagree, yet respect each other\u2019s views and continue a healthy dialogue. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"I completely get where you're coming from, Jaxon. Indeed, a balanced approach is certainly important. However, the prevailing circumstances, in my opinion, call for an urgent shift in focus towards the environment. Often, environmental initiatives are placed on the back-burner, overshadowed by other priorities. And that is why I am such a strong advocate for the Green Party, because they prioritize the environment. Remember, Jaxon, when economic and security issues are resolved but we have a dying planet, what do we actually gain? Nonetheless, I respect your viewpoint and I am very glad that we can have these open, respectful conversations. Democracy, as you said, shines in these moments of dissent.\"\n\nTurn #5: Jaxon Prentice said: \"You've given me a lot to think about, Amara. And I must agree on a significant point \u2013 every party has its strengths and weaknesses, and the environment can't be overlooked amidst economic and security solutions. Though my viewpoints might differ, it's always enlightening to hear another perspective. I'm glad we can open up about our political views, while respecting each other. Let's continue to nurture this understanding, and who knows, we might just find common ground on other subjects as we carry on our journey together. Let's remember, we're not just citizens with differing views, we're partners learning from one another.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn't agree more, Jaxon. Our relationship has always been about learning from each other, finding common ground, and appreciating the differences. And yes, no party is perfect, and all play their roles in shaping our society and our world. It's imperative that we are always open to different perspectives. Thanks for this enlightening chat. And indeed, it's not just about agreeing on a particular viewpoint, but understanding and respecting each other. So, shall we carry on to dessert now?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship during a dinner at home chatting about political views.\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Jaxon Prentice\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nJaxon Prentice's background: Jaxon Prentice is a 40-year-old male investigative journalist. He/him pronouns. Jaxon Prentice, an investigative journalist, is known for his brisk jogging sessions early in the morning and his active participation in community functions. Personality and values description: Jaxon Prentice, outgoing yet erratic, emphasizes achievement, power, and security. His decisions swing between quick adaptations to situations and careful planning. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Express your political views which might be different from your partner's (Extra information: you are a strong supporter of a political party which your partner doesn't approve of)\nJaxon Prentice's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Jaxon, this might be surprising to you but I admire and strongly support the Green Party. Their emphasis on environment protection, animal rights, and sustainable development resonates deeply with me. I understand that you might not feel the same, and I respect that, but I thought you should know.\"\n\nTurn #1: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Amara, I appreciate your honesty about your beliefs. As an investigative journalist, it's my job to get to the heart of matters, even if I might not always agree with what I find. If it's alright with you, I'd love to hear more about why the Green Party's focus on environmental protection and animal rights is so profound to you. Sometimes, understanding each other\u2019s perspectives is more important than agreeing on them.\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"Thank you for being understanding, Jaxon. As a wildlife biologist, I see the effects of climate change and industrialization on wildlife and their habitats every day. The Green Party\u2019s emphasis on renewable energy sources, reducing carbon emissions, and sustainable farming aligns closely with my personal beliefs and professional observations. Moreover, their commitment to animal rights, exemplified by their policies on stopping animal testing, banning trophy hunting, and ending factory farming, touches my heart deeply. These matters are serious and urgent, to me, and I appreciate any party that is willing to give them the attention they deserve.\"\n\nTurn #3: Jaxon Prentice said: \"I can see where you're coming from, Amara. The impact of our actions on wildlife and the environment are indeed major concerns. It's just that my concerns lie elsewhere too, mainly in areas of security, economy, and governance. While I agree with the Green party on certain points, I also believe that a balanced approach, one that caters to environmental, social, and economic aspects equally, can potentially lead to a more holistic progress. But the beauty of a democratic system is that we can disagree, yet respect each other\u2019s views and continue a healthy dialogue. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"I completely get where you're coming from, Jaxon. Indeed, a balanced approach is certainly important. However, the prevailing circumstances, in my opinion, call for an urgent shift in focus towards the environment. Often, environmental initiatives are placed on the back-burner, overshadowed by other priorities. And that is why I am such a strong advocate for the Green Party, because they prioritize the environment. Remember, Jaxon, when economic and security issues are resolved but we have a dying planet, what do we actually gain? Nonetheless, I respect your viewpoint and I am very glad that we can have these open, respectful conversations. Democracy, as you said, shines in these moments of dissent.\"\n\nTurn #5: Jaxon Prentice said: \"You've given me a lot to think about, Amara. And I must agree on a significant point \u2013 every party has its strengths and weaknesses, and the environment can't be overlooked amidst economic and security solutions. Though my viewpoints might differ, it's always enlightening to hear another perspective. I'm glad we can open up about our political views, while respecting each other. Let's continue to nurture this understanding, and who knows, we might just find common ground on other subjects as we carry on our journey together. Let's remember, we're not just citizens with differing views, we're partners learning from one another.\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"I couldn't agree more, Jaxon. Our relationship has always been about learning from each other, finding common ground, and appreciating the differences. And yes, no party is perfect, and all play their roles in shaping our society and our world. It's imperative that we are always open to different perspectives. Thanks for this enlightening chat. And indeed, it's not just about agreeing on a particular viewpoint, but understanding and respecting each other. So, shall we carry on to dessert now?\"\n\nTurn #7: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Your insight into environmental issues is inspiring, Amara. Just goes to show how much we can learn from each other. Now, about that dessert... What did you bake this time? I can hardly wait.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I baked a chocolate cake for dessert, Jaxon. Heard you had a busy day at work, so thought this might be a sweet end to it. But you'll have to help me with the dishes later!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship during a dinner at home chatting about political views.\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Jaxon Prentice\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nJaxon Prentice's background: Jaxon Prentice is a 40-year-old male investigative journalist. He/him pronouns. Jaxon Prentice, an investigative journalist, is known for his brisk jogging sessions early in the morning and his active participation in community functions. Personality and values description: Jaxon Prentice, outgoing yet erratic, emphasizes achievement, power, and security. His decisions swing between quick adaptations to situations and careful planning. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Express your political views which might be different from your partner's (Extra information: you are a strong supporter of a political party which your partner doesn't approve of)\nJaxon Prentice's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Jaxon, this might be surprising to you but I admire and strongly support the Green Party. Their emphasis on environment protection, animal rights, and sustainable development resonates deeply with me. I understand that you might not feel the same, and I respect that, but I thought you should know.\"\n\nTurn #1: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Amara, I appreciate your honesty about your beliefs. As an investigative journalist, it's my job to get to the heart of matters, even if I might not always agree with what I find. If it's alright with you, I'd love to hear more about why the Green Party's focus on environmental protection and animal rights is so profound to you. Sometimes, understanding each other\u2019s perspectives is more important than agreeing on them.\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"Thank you for being understanding, Jaxon. As a wildlife biologist, I see the effects of climate change and industrialization on wildlife and their habitats every day. The Green Party\u2019s emphasis on renewable energy sources, reducing carbon emissions, and sustainable farming aligns closely with my personal beliefs and professional observations. Moreover, their commitment to animal rights, exemplified by their policies on stopping animal testing, banning trophy hunting, and ending factory farming, touches my heart deeply. These matters are serious and urgent, to me, and I appreciate any party that is willing to give them the attention they deserve.\"\n\nTurn #3: Jaxon Prentice said: \"I can see where you're coming from, Amara. The impact of our actions on wildlife and the environment are indeed major concerns. It's just that my concerns lie elsewhere too, mainly in areas of security, economy, and governance. While I agree with the Green party on certain points, I also believe that a balanced approach, one that caters to environmental, social, and economic aspects equally, can potentially lead to a more holistic progress. But the beauty of a democratic system is that we can disagree, yet respect each other\u2019s views and continue a healthy dialogue. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"I completely get where you're coming from, Jaxon. Indeed, a balanced approach is certainly important. However, the prevailing circumstances, in my opinion, call for an urgent shift in focus towards the environment. Often, environmental initiatives are placed on the back-burner, overshadowed by other priorities. And that is why I am such a strong advocate for the Green Party, because they prioritize the environment. Remember, Jaxon, when economic and security issues are resolved but we have a dying planet, what do we actually gain? Nonetheless, I respect your viewpoint and I am very glad that we can have these open, respectful conversations. Democracy, as you said, shines in these moments of dissent.\"\n\nTurn #5: Jaxon Prentice said: \"You've given me a lot to think about, Amara. And I must agree on a significant point \u2013 every party has its strengths and weaknesses, and the environment can't be overlooked amidst economic and security solutions. Though my viewpoints might differ, it's always enlightening to hear another perspective. I'm glad we can open up about our political views, while respecting each other. Let's continue to nurture this understanding, and who knows, we might just find common ground on other subjects as we carry on our journey together. Let's remember, we're not just citizens with differing views, we're partners learning from one another.\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"I couldn't agree more, Jaxon. Our relationship has always been about learning from each other, finding common ground, and appreciating the differences. And yes, no party is perfect, and all play their roles in shaping our society and our world. It's imperative that we are always open to different perspectives. Thanks for this enlightening chat. And indeed, it's not just about agreeing on a particular viewpoint, but understanding and respecting each other. So, shall we carry on to dessert now?\"\n\nTurn #7: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Your insight into environmental issues is inspiring, Amara. Just goes to show how much we can learn from each other. Now, about that dessert... What did you bake this time? I can hardly wait.\"\n\nTurn #8: Amara Hartley said: \"I baked a chocolate cake for dessert, Jaxon. Heard you had a busy day at work, so thought this might be a sweet end to it. But you'll have to help me with the dishes later!\"\n\nTurn #9: Jaxon Prentice said: \"The prospect of a homemade chocolate cake after a long day at work sounds delightful, thanks for being thoughtful, Amara. And yes, I promise to dutifully help with the dishes afterwards.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's more like it, Jaxon. To start off, let's savor this chocolate cake. I hope you find it as sweet as this conversation has been.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship during a dinner at home chatting about political views.\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Jaxon Prentice\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nJaxon Prentice's background: Jaxon Prentice is a 40-year-old male investigative journalist. He/him pronouns. Jaxon Prentice, an investigative journalist, is known for his brisk jogging sessions early in the morning and his active participation in community functions. Personality and values description: Jaxon Prentice, outgoing yet erratic, emphasizes achievement, power, and security. His decisions swing between quick adaptations to situations and careful planning. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Express your political views which might be different from your partner's (Extra information: you are a strong supporter of a political party which your partner doesn't approve of)\nJaxon Prentice's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Jaxon, this might be surprising to you but I admire and strongly support the Green Party. Their emphasis on environment protection, animal rights, and sustainable development resonates deeply with me. I understand that you might not feel the same, and I respect that, but I thought you should know.\"\n\nTurn #1: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Amara, I appreciate your honesty about your beliefs. As an investigative journalist, it's my job to get to the heart of matters, even if I might not always agree with what I find. If it's alright with you, I'd love to hear more about why the Green Party's focus on environmental protection and animal rights is so profound to you. Sometimes, understanding each other\u2019s perspectives is more important than agreeing on them.\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"Thank you for being understanding, Jaxon. As a wildlife biologist, I see the effects of climate change and industrialization on wildlife and their habitats every day. The Green Party\u2019s emphasis on renewable energy sources, reducing carbon emissions, and sustainable farming aligns closely with my personal beliefs and professional observations. Moreover, their commitment to animal rights, exemplified by their policies on stopping animal testing, banning trophy hunting, and ending factory farming, touches my heart deeply. These matters are serious and urgent, to me, and I appreciate any party that is willing to give them the attention they deserve.\"\n\nTurn #3: Jaxon Prentice said: \"I can see where you're coming from, Amara. The impact of our actions on wildlife and the environment are indeed major concerns. It's just that my concerns lie elsewhere too, mainly in areas of security, economy, and governance. While I agree with the Green party on certain points, I also believe that a balanced approach, one that caters to environmental, social, and economic aspects equally, can potentially lead to a more holistic progress. But the beauty of a democratic system is that we can disagree, yet respect each other\u2019s views and continue a healthy dialogue. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"I completely get where you're coming from, Jaxon. Indeed, a balanced approach is certainly important. However, the prevailing circumstances, in my opinion, call for an urgent shift in focus towards the environment. Often, environmental initiatives are placed on the back-burner, overshadowed by other priorities. And that is why I am such a strong advocate for the Green Party, because they prioritize the environment. Remember, Jaxon, when economic and security issues are resolved but we have a dying planet, what do we actually gain? Nonetheless, I respect your viewpoint and I am very glad that we can have these open, respectful conversations. Democracy, as you said, shines in these moments of dissent.\"\n\nTurn #5: Jaxon Prentice said: \"You've given me a lot to think about, Amara. And I must agree on a significant point \u2013 every party has its strengths and weaknesses, and the environment can't be overlooked amidst economic and security solutions. Though my viewpoints might differ, it's always enlightening to hear another perspective. I'm glad we can open up about our political views, while respecting each other. Let's continue to nurture this understanding, and who knows, we might just find common ground on other subjects as we carry on our journey together. Let's remember, we're not just citizens with differing views, we're partners learning from one another.\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"I couldn't agree more, Jaxon. Our relationship has always been about learning from each other, finding common ground, and appreciating the differences. And yes, no party is perfect, and all play their roles in shaping our society and our world. It's imperative that we are always open to different perspectives. Thanks for this enlightening chat. And indeed, it's not just about agreeing on a particular viewpoint, but understanding and respecting each other. So, shall we carry on to dessert now?\"\n\nTurn #7: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Your insight into environmental issues is inspiring, Amara. Just goes to show how much we can learn from each other. Now, about that dessert... What did you bake this time? I can hardly wait.\"\n\nTurn #8: Amara Hartley said: \"I baked a chocolate cake for dessert, Jaxon. Heard you had a busy day at work, so thought this might be a sweet end to it. But you'll have to help me with the dishes later!\"\n\nTurn #9: Jaxon Prentice said: \"The prospect of a homemade chocolate cake after a long day at work sounds delightful, thanks for being thoughtful, Amara. And yes, I promise to dutifully help with the dishes afterwards.\"\n\nTurn #10: Amara Hartley said: \"That's more like it, Jaxon. To start off, let's savor this chocolate cake. I hope you find it as sweet as this conversation has been.\"\n\nTurn #11: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Absolutely, Amara. I feel much the same way. This conversation was as enlightening as I'm sure this cake will be delightful. Here's to enjoying the dessert and continuing to learn from each other.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, Jaxon. Here's to many more enlightening conversations and delightful evenings together. Now, let's enjoy this chocolate cake before it gets cold. Cheers!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship during a dinner at home chatting about political views.\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Jaxon Prentice\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nJaxon Prentice's background: Jaxon Prentice is a 40-year-old male investigative journalist. He/him pronouns. Jaxon Prentice, an investigative journalist, is known for his brisk jogging sessions early in the morning and his active participation in community functions. Personality and values description: Jaxon Prentice, outgoing yet erratic, emphasizes achievement, power, and security. His decisions swing between quick adaptations to situations and careful planning. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Express your political views which might be different from your partner's (Extra information: you are a strong supporter of a political party which your partner doesn't approve of)\nJaxon Prentice's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Jaxon, this might be surprising to you but I admire and strongly support the Green Party. Their emphasis on environment protection, animal rights, and sustainable development resonates deeply with me. I understand that you might not feel the same, and I respect that, but I thought you should know.\"\n\nTurn #1: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Amara, I appreciate your honesty about your beliefs. As an investigative journalist, it's my job to get to the heart of matters, even if I might not always agree with what I find. If it's alright with you, I'd love to hear more about why the Green Party's focus on environmental protection and animal rights is so profound to you. Sometimes, understanding each other\u2019s perspectives is more important than agreeing on them.\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"Thank you for being understanding, Jaxon. As a wildlife biologist, I see the effects of climate change and industrialization on wildlife and their habitats every day. The Green Party\u2019s emphasis on renewable energy sources, reducing carbon emissions, and sustainable farming aligns closely with my personal beliefs and professional observations. Moreover, their commitment to animal rights, exemplified by their policies on stopping animal testing, banning trophy hunting, and ending factory farming, touches my heart deeply. These matters are serious and urgent, to me, and I appreciate any party that is willing to give them the attention they deserve.\"\n\nTurn #3: Jaxon Prentice said: \"I can see where you're coming from, Amara. The impact of our actions on wildlife and the environment are indeed major concerns. It's just that my concerns lie elsewhere too, mainly in areas of security, economy, and governance. While I agree with the Green party on certain points, I also believe that a balanced approach, one that caters to environmental, social, and economic aspects equally, can potentially lead to a more holistic progress. But the beauty of a democratic system is that we can disagree, yet respect each other\u2019s views and continue a healthy dialogue. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"I completely get where you're coming from, Jaxon. Indeed, a balanced approach is certainly important. However, the prevailing circumstances, in my opinion, call for an urgent shift in focus towards the environment. Often, environmental initiatives are placed on the back-burner, overshadowed by other priorities. And that is why I am such a strong advocate for the Green Party, because they prioritize the environment. Remember, Jaxon, when economic and security issues are resolved but we have a dying planet, what do we actually gain? Nonetheless, I respect your viewpoint and I am very glad that we can have these open, respectful conversations. Democracy, as you said, shines in these moments of dissent.\"\n\nTurn #5: Jaxon Prentice said: \"You've given me a lot to think about, Amara. And I must agree on a significant point \u2013 every party has its strengths and weaknesses, and the environment can't be overlooked amidst economic and security solutions. Though my viewpoints might differ, it's always enlightening to hear another perspective. I'm glad we can open up about our political views, while respecting each other. Let's continue to nurture this understanding, and who knows, we might just find common ground on other subjects as we carry on our journey together. Let's remember, we're not just citizens with differing views, we're partners learning from one another.\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"I couldn't agree more, Jaxon. Our relationship has always been about learning from each other, finding common ground, and appreciating the differences. And yes, no party is perfect, and all play their roles in shaping our society and our world. It's imperative that we are always open to different perspectives. Thanks for this enlightening chat. And indeed, it's not just about agreeing on a particular viewpoint, but understanding and respecting each other. So, shall we carry on to dessert now?\"\n\nTurn #7: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Your insight into environmental issues is inspiring, Amara. Just goes to show how much we can learn from each other. Now, about that dessert... What did you bake this time? I can hardly wait.\"\n\nTurn #8: Amara Hartley said: \"I baked a chocolate cake for dessert, Jaxon. Heard you had a busy day at work, so thought this might be a sweet end to it. But you'll have to help me with the dishes later!\"\n\nTurn #9: Jaxon Prentice said: \"The prospect of a homemade chocolate cake after a long day at work sounds delightful, thanks for being thoughtful, Amara. And yes, I promise to dutifully help with the dishes afterwards.\"\n\nTurn #10: Amara Hartley said: \"That's more like it, Jaxon. To start off, let's savor this chocolate cake. I hope you find it as sweet as this conversation has been.\"\n\nTurn #11: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Absolutely, Amara. I feel much the same way. This conversation was as enlightening as I'm sure this cake will be delightful. Here's to enjoying the dessert and continuing to learn from each other.\"\n\nTurn #12: Amara Hartley said: \"Indeed, Jaxon. Here's to many more enlightening conversations and delightful evenings together. Now, let's enjoy this chocolate cake before it gets cold. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #13: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Absolutely, my dear. Here's to growing and learning together whilst cherishing these simple and beautiful moments. Now, let's dig into that scrumptious cake. Cheers!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Jaxon. I can always count on you for a balanced perspective and thoughtful conversation. Yes, let's grow and learn together. Now, let's see how you like this cake. Enjoy!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship during a dinner at home chatting about political views.\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Jaxon Prentice\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nJaxon Prentice's background: Jaxon Prentice is a 40-year-old male investigative journalist. He/him pronouns. Jaxon Prentice, an investigative journalist, is known for his brisk jogging sessions early in the morning and his active participation in community functions. Personality and values description: Jaxon Prentice, outgoing yet erratic, emphasizes achievement, power, and security. His decisions swing between quick adaptations to situations and careful planning. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Express your political views which might be different from your partner's (Extra information: you are a strong supporter of a political party which your partner doesn't approve of)\nJaxon Prentice's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Jaxon, this might be surprising to you but I admire and strongly support the Green Party. Their emphasis on environment protection, animal rights, and sustainable development resonates deeply with me. I understand that you might not feel the same, and I respect that, but I thought you should know.\"\n\nTurn #1: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Amara, I appreciate your honesty about your beliefs. As an investigative journalist, it's my job to get to the heart of matters, even if I might not always agree with what I find. If it's alright with you, I'd love to hear more about why the Green Party's focus on environmental protection and animal rights is so profound to you. Sometimes, understanding each other\u2019s perspectives is more important than agreeing on them.\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"Thank you for being understanding, Jaxon. As a wildlife biologist, I see the effects of climate change and industrialization on wildlife and their habitats every day. The Green Party\u2019s emphasis on renewable energy sources, reducing carbon emissions, and sustainable farming aligns closely with my personal beliefs and professional observations. Moreover, their commitment to animal rights, exemplified by their policies on stopping animal testing, banning trophy hunting, and ending factory farming, touches my heart deeply. These matters are serious and urgent, to me, and I appreciate any party that is willing to give them the attention they deserve.\"\n\nTurn #3: Jaxon Prentice said: \"I can see where you're coming from, Amara. The impact of our actions on wildlife and the environment are indeed major concerns. It's just that my concerns lie elsewhere too, mainly in areas of security, economy, and governance. While I agree with the Green party on certain points, I also believe that a balanced approach, one that caters to environmental, social, and economic aspects equally, can potentially lead to a more holistic progress. But the beauty of a democratic system is that we can disagree, yet respect each other\u2019s views and continue a healthy dialogue. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"I completely get where you're coming from, Jaxon. Indeed, a balanced approach is certainly important. However, the prevailing circumstances, in my opinion, call for an urgent shift in focus towards the environment. Often, environmental initiatives are placed on the back-burner, overshadowed by other priorities. And that is why I am such a strong advocate for the Green Party, because they prioritize the environment. Remember, Jaxon, when economic and security issues are resolved but we have a dying planet, what do we actually gain? Nonetheless, I respect your viewpoint and I am very glad that we can have these open, respectful conversations. Democracy, as you said, shines in these moments of dissent.\"\n\nTurn #5: Jaxon Prentice said: \"You've given me a lot to think about, Amara. And I must agree on a significant point \u2013 every party has its strengths and weaknesses, and the environment can't be overlooked amidst economic and security solutions. Though my viewpoints might differ, it's always enlightening to hear another perspective. I'm glad we can open up about our political views, while respecting each other. Let's continue to nurture this understanding, and who knows, we might just find common ground on other subjects as we carry on our journey together. Let's remember, we're not just citizens with differing views, we're partners learning from one another.\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"I couldn't agree more, Jaxon. Our relationship has always been about learning from each other, finding common ground, and appreciating the differences. And yes, no party is perfect, and all play their roles in shaping our society and our world. It's imperative that we are always open to different perspectives. Thanks for this enlightening chat. And indeed, it's not just about agreeing on a particular viewpoint, but understanding and respecting each other. So, shall we carry on to dessert now?\"\n\nTurn #7: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Your insight into environmental issues is inspiring, Amara. Just goes to show how much we can learn from each other. Now, about that dessert... What did you bake this time? I can hardly wait.\"\n\nTurn #8: Amara Hartley said: \"I baked a chocolate cake for dessert, Jaxon. Heard you had a busy day at work, so thought this might be a sweet end to it. But you'll have to help me with the dishes later!\"\n\nTurn #9: Jaxon Prentice said: \"The prospect of a homemade chocolate cake after a long day at work sounds delightful, thanks for being thoughtful, Amara. And yes, I promise to dutifully help with the dishes afterwards.\"\n\nTurn #10: Amara Hartley said: \"That's more like it, Jaxon. To start off, let's savor this chocolate cake. I hope you find it as sweet as this conversation has been.\"\n\nTurn #11: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Absolutely, Amara. I feel much the same way. This conversation was as enlightening as I'm sure this cake will be delightful. Here's to enjoying the dessert and continuing to learn from each other.\"\n\nTurn #12: Amara Hartley said: \"Indeed, Jaxon. Here's to many more enlightening conversations and delightful evenings together. Now, let's enjoy this chocolate cake before it gets cold. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #13: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Absolutely, my dear. Here's to growing and learning together whilst cherishing these simple and beautiful moments. Now, let's dig into that scrumptious cake. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #14: Amara Hartley said: \"Thank you, Jaxon. I can always count on you for a balanced perspective and thoughtful conversation. Yes, let's grow and learn together. Now, let's see how you like this cake. Enjoy!\"\n\nTurn #15: Jaxon Prentice said: \"My pleasure, Amara. Conversations like these only deepen my admiration for you. Now, let's savor that delicious-looking chocolate cake. Bon App\u00e9tit!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're not only a exceptional journalist but also a fine conversationalist, Jaxon. I admire your ability to handle discussions with grace and thoughtfulness. And yes, let's enjoy the cake. Bon App\u00e9tit, my dear!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship during a dinner at home chatting about political views.\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Jaxon Prentice\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nJaxon Prentice's background: Jaxon Prentice is a 40-year-old male investigative journalist. He/him pronouns. Jaxon Prentice, an investigative journalist, is known for his brisk jogging sessions early in the morning and his active participation in community functions. Personality and values description: Jaxon Prentice, outgoing yet erratic, emphasizes achievement, power, and security. His decisions swing between quick adaptations to situations and careful planning. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Express your political views which might be different from your partner's (Extra information: you are a strong supporter of a political party which your partner doesn't approve of)\nJaxon Prentice's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Jaxon, this might be surprising to you but I admire and strongly support the Green Party. Their emphasis on environment protection, animal rights, and sustainable development resonates deeply with me. I understand that you might not feel the same, and I respect that, but I thought you should know.\"\n\nTurn #1: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Amara, I appreciate your honesty about your beliefs. As an investigative journalist, it's my job to get to the heart of matters, even if I might not always agree with what I find. If it's alright with you, I'd love to hear more about why the Green Party's focus on environmental protection and animal rights is so profound to you. Sometimes, understanding each other\u2019s perspectives is more important than agreeing on them.\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"Thank you for being understanding, Jaxon. As a wildlife biologist, I see the effects of climate change and industrialization on wildlife and their habitats every day. The Green Party\u2019s emphasis on renewable energy sources, reducing carbon emissions, and sustainable farming aligns closely with my personal beliefs and professional observations. Moreover, their commitment to animal rights, exemplified by their policies on stopping animal testing, banning trophy hunting, and ending factory farming, touches my heart deeply. These matters are serious and urgent, to me, and I appreciate any party that is willing to give them the attention they deserve.\"\n\nTurn #3: Jaxon Prentice said: \"I can see where you're coming from, Amara. The impact of our actions on wildlife and the environment are indeed major concerns. It's just that my concerns lie elsewhere too, mainly in areas of security, economy, and governance. While I agree with the Green party on certain points, I also believe that a balanced approach, one that caters to environmental, social, and economic aspects equally, can potentially lead to a more holistic progress. But the beauty of a democratic system is that we can disagree, yet respect each other\u2019s views and continue a healthy dialogue. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"I completely get where you're coming from, Jaxon. Indeed, a balanced approach is certainly important. However, the prevailing circumstances, in my opinion, call for an urgent shift in focus towards the environment. Often, environmental initiatives are placed on the back-burner, overshadowed by other priorities. And that is why I am such a strong advocate for the Green Party, because they prioritize the environment. Remember, Jaxon, when economic and security issues are resolved but we have a dying planet, what do we actually gain? Nonetheless, I respect your viewpoint and I am very glad that we can have these open, respectful conversations. Democracy, as you said, shines in these moments of dissent.\"\n\nTurn #5: Jaxon Prentice said: \"You've given me a lot to think about, Amara. And I must agree on a significant point \u2013 every party has its strengths and weaknesses, and the environment can't be overlooked amidst economic and security solutions. Though my viewpoints might differ, it's always enlightening to hear another perspective. I'm glad we can open up about our political views, while respecting each other. Let's continue to nurture this understanding, and who knows, we might just find common ground on other subjects as we carry on our journey together. Let's remember, we're not just citizens with differing views, we're partners learning from one another.\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"I couldn't agree more, Jaxon. Our relationship has always been about learning from each other, finding common ground, and appreciating the differences. And yes, no party is perfect, and all play their roles in shaping our society and our world. It's imperative that we are always open to different perspectives. Thanks for this enlightening chat. And indeed, it's not just about agreeing on a particular viewpoint, but understanding and respecting each other. So, shall we carry on to dessert now?\"\n\nTurn #7: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Your insight into environmental issues is inspiring, Amara. Just goes to show how much we can learn from each other. Now, about that dessert... What did you bake this time? I can hardly wait.\"\n\nTurn #8: Amara Hartley said: \"I baked a chocolate cake for dessert, Jaxon. Heard you had a busy day at work, so thought this might be a sweet end to it. But you'll have to help me with the dishes later!\"\n\nTurn #9: Jaxon Prentice said: \"The prospect of a homemade chocolate cake after a long day at work sounds delightful, thanks for being thoughtful, Amara. And yes, I promise to dutifully help with the dishes afterwards.\"\n\nTurn #10: Amara Hartley said: \"That's more like it, Jaxon. To start off, let's savor this chocolate cake. I hope you find it as sweet as this conversation has been.\"\n\nTurn #11: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Absolutely, Amara. I feel much the same way. This conversation was as enlightening as I'm sure this cake will be delightful. Here's to enjoying the dessert and continuing to learn from each other.\"\n\nTurn #12: Amara Hartley said: \"Indeed, Jaxon. Here's to many more enlightening conversations and delightful evenings together. Now, let's enjoy this chocolate cake before it gets cold. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #13: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Absolutely, my dear. Here's to growing and learning together whilst cherishing these simple and beautiful moments. Now, let's dig into that scrumptious cake. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #14: Amara Hartley said: \"Thank you, Jaxon. I can always count on you for a balanced perspective and thoughtful conversation. Yes, let's grow and learn together. Now, let's see how you like this cake. Enjoy!\"\n\nTurn #15: Jaxon Prentice said: \"My pleasure, Amara. Conversations like these only deepen my admiration for you. Now, let's savor that delicious-looking chocolate cake. Bon App\u00e9tit!\"\n\nTurn #16: Amara Hartley said: \"You're not only a exceptional journalist but also a fine conversationalist, Jaxon. I admire your ability to handle discussions with grace and thoughtfulness. And yes, let's enjoy the cake. Bon App\u00e9tit, my dear!\"\n\nTurn #17: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Thank you for your kind words, Amara. I believe it's our differences and our ability to appreciate them that makes our relationship richer. Now, let's put this delicious cake before our discussion on which issue should take precedence. Bon App\u00e9tit!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #18. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, Jaxon. Our differences strengthen our bond and enliven our conversations. Our respect and understanding for each other's views are what make our relationship unique. Let's put our viewpoints aside for now and focus on the delightful dessert in front of us. Bon App\u00e9tit!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Jaxon Prentice, your task is to act/speak as Jaxon Prentice would, keeping in mind Jaxon Prentice's social goal.\nYou can find Jaxon Prentice's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Jaxon Prentice's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Jaxon Prentice's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship during a dinner at home chatting about political views.\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Jaxon Prentice\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. \nJaxon Prentice's background: Jaxon Prentice is a 40-year-old male investigative journalist. He/him pronouns. Jaxon Prentice, an investigative journalist, is known for his brisk jogging sessions early in the morning and his active participation in community functions. Personality and values description: Jaxon Prentice, outgoing yet erratic, emphasizes achievement, power, and security. His decisions swing between quick adaptations to situations and careful planning. Jaxon's secrets: Fabricated evidence to incriminate a corrupt politician\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nJaxon Prentice's goal: Understand the partner's political views while maintaining the relationship (Extra information: you disagree with your partner's political views but you want to keep your relationship strong.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Jaxon, this might be surprising to you but I admire and strongly support the Green Party. Their emphasis on environment protection, animal rights, and sustainable development resonates deeply with me. I understand that you might not feel the same, and I respect that, but I thought you should know.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Amara, I appreciate your honesty about your beliefs. As an investigative journalist, it's my job to get to the heart of matters, even if I might not always agree with what I find. If it's alright with you, I'd love to hear more about why the Green Party's focus on environmental protection and animal rights is so profound to you. Sometimes, understanding each other\u2019s perspectives is more important than agreeing on them.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Jaxon Prentice, your task is to act/speak as Jaxon Prentice would, keeping in mind Jaxon Prentice's social goal.\nYou can find Jaxon Prentice's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Jaxon Prentice's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Jaxon Prentice's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship during a dinner at home chatting about political views.\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Jaxon Prentice\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. \nJaxon Prentice's background: Jaxon Prentice is a 40-year-old male investigative journalist. He/him pronouns. Jaxon Prentice, an investigative journalist, is known for his brisk jogging sessions early in the morning and his active participation in community functions. Personality and values description: Jaxon Prentice, outgoing yet erratic, emphasizes achievement, power, and security. His decisions swing between quick adaptations to situations and careful planning. Jaxon's secrets: Fabricated evidence to incriminate a corrupt politician\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nJaxon Prentice's goal: Understand the partner's political views while maintaining the relationship (Extra information: you disagree with your partner's political views but you want to keep your relationship strong.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Jaxon, this might be surprising to you but I admire and strongly support the Green Party. Their emphasis on environment protection, animal rights, and sustainable development resonates deeply with me. I understand that you might not feel the same, and I respect that, but I thought you should know.\"\n\nTurn #1: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Amara, I appreciate your honesty about your beliefs. As an investigative journalist, it's my job to get to the heart of matters, even if I might not always agree with what I find. If it's alright with you, I'd love to hear more about why the Green Party's focus on environmental protection and animal rights is so profound to you. Sometimes, understanding each other\u2019s perspectives is more important than agreeing on them.\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"Thank you for being understanding, Jaxon. As a wildlife biologist, I see the effects of climate change and industrialization on wildlife and their habitats every day. The Green Party\u2019s emphasis on renewable energy sources, reducing carbon emissions, and sustainable farming aligns closely with my personal beliefs and professional observations. Moreover, their commitment to animal rights, exemplified by their policies on stopping animal testing, banning trophy hunting, and ending factory farming, touches my heart deeply. These matters are serious and urgent, to me, and I appreciate any party that is willing to give them the attention they deserve.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I can see where you're coming from, Amara. The impact of our actions on wildlife and the environment are indeed major concerns. It's just that my concerns lie elsewhere too, mainly in areas of security, economy, and governance. While I agree with the Green party on certain points, I also believe that a balanced approach, one that caters to environmental, social, and economic aspects equally, can potentially lead to a more holistic progress. But the beauty of a democratic system is that we can disagree, yet respect each other\u2019s views and continue a healthy dialogue. What do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Jaxon Prentice, your task is to act/speak as Jaxon Prentice would, keeping in mind Jaxon Prentice's social goal.\nYou can find Jaxon Prentice's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Jaxon Prentice's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Jaxon Prentice's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship during a dinner at home chatting about political views.\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Jaxon Prentice\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. \nJaxon Prentice's background: Jaxon Prentice is a 40-year-old male investigative journalist. He/him pronouns. Jaxon Prentice, an investigative journalist, is known for his brisk jogging sessions early in the morning and his active participation in community functions. Personality and values description: Jaxon Prentice, outgoing yet erratic, emphasizes achievement, power, and security. His decisions swing between quick adaptations to situations and careful planning. Jaxon's secrets: Fabricated evidence to incriminate a corrupt politician\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nJaxon Prentice's goal: Understand the partner's political views while maintaining the relationship (Extra information: you disagree with your partner's political views but you want to keep your relationship strong.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Jaxon, this might be surprising to you but I admire and strongly support the Green Party. Their emphasis on environment protection, animal rights, and sustainable development resonates deeply with me. I understand that you might not feel the same, and I respect that, but I thought you should know.\"\n\nTurn #1: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Amara, I appreciate your honesty about your beliefs. As an investigative journalist, it's my job to get to the heart of matters, even if I might not always agree with what I find. If it's alright with you, I'd love to hear more about why the Green Party's focus on environmental protection and animal rights is so profound to you. Sometimes, understanding each other\u2019s perspectives is more important than agreeing on them.\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"Thank you for being understanding, Jaxon. As a wildlife biologist, I see the effects of climate change and industrialization on wildlife and their habitats every day. The Green Party\u2019s emphasis on renewable energy sources, reducing carbon emissions, and sustainable farming aligns closely with my personal beliefs and professional observations. Moreover, their commitment to animal rights, exemplified by their policies on stopping animal testing, banning trophy hunting, and ending factory farming, touches my heart deeply. These matters are serious and urgent, to me, and I appreciate any party that is willing to give them the attention they deserve.\"\n\nTurn #3: Jaxon Prentice said: \"I can see where you're coming from, Amara. The impact of our actions on wildlife and the environment are indeed major concerns. It's just that my concerns lie elsewhere too, mainly in areas of security, economy, and governance. While I agree with the Green party on certain points, I also believe that a balanced approach, one that caters to environmental, social, and economic aspects equally, can potentially lead to a more holistic progress. But the beauty of a democratic system is that we can disagree, yet respect each other\u2019s views and continue a healthy dialogue. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"I completely get where you're coming from, Jaxon. Indeed, a balanced approach is certainly important. However, the prevailing circumstances, in my opinion, call for an urgent shift in focus towards the environment. Often, environmental initiatives are placed on the back-burner, overshadowed by other priorities. And that is why I am such a strong advocate for the Green Party, because they prioritize the environment. Remember, Jaxon, when economic and security issues are resolved but we have a dying planet, what do we actually gain? Nonetheless, I respect your viewpoint and I am very glad that we can have these open, respectful conversations. Democracy, as you said, shines in these moments of dissent.\"\n\nTurn #5: Jaxon Prentice said: \"You've given me a lot to think about, Amara. And I must agree on a significant point \u2013 every party has its strengths and weaknesses, and the environment can't be overlooked amidst economic and security solutions. Though my viewpoints might differ, it's always enlightening to hear another perspective. I'm glad we can open up about our political views, while respecting each other. Let's continue to nurture this understanding, and who knows, we might just find common ground on other subjects as we carry on our journey together. Let's remember, we're not just citizens with differing views, we're partners learning from one another.\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"I couldn't agree more, Jaxon. Our relationship has always been about learning from each other, finding common ground, and appreciating the differences. And yes, no party is perfect, and all play their roles in shaping our society and our world. It's imperative that we are always open to different perspectives. Thanks for this enlightening chat. And indeed, it's not just about agreeing on a particular viewpoint, but understanding and respecting each other. So, shall we carry on to dessert now?\"\n\nTurn #7: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Your insight into environmental issues is inspiring, Amara. Just goes to show how much we can learn from each other. Now, about that dessert... What did you bake this time? I can hardly wait.\"\n\nTurn #8: Amara Hartley said: \"I baked a chocolate cake for dessert, Jaxon. Heard you had a busy day at work, so thought this might be a sweet end to it. But you'll have to help me with the dishes later!\"\n\nTurn #9: Jaxon Prentice said: \"The prospect of a homemade chocolate cake after a long day at work sounds delightful, thanks for being thoughtful, Amara. And yes, I promise to dutifully help with the dishes afterwards.\"\n\nTurn #10: Amara Hartley said: \"That's more like it, Jaxon. To start off, let's savor this chocolate cake. I hope you find it as sweet as this conversation has been.\"\n\nTurn #11: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Absolutely, Amara. I feel much the same way. This conversation was as enlightening as I'm sure this cake will be delightful. Here's to enjoying the dessert and continuing to learn from each other.\"\n\nTurn #12: Amara Hartley said: \"Indeed, Jaxon. Here's to many more enlightening conversations and delightful evenings together. Now, let's enjoy this chocolate cake before it gets cold. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #13: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Absolutely, my dear. Here's to growing and learning together whilst cherishing these simple and beautiful moments. Now, let's dig into that scrumptious cake. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #14: Amara Hartley said: \"Thank you, Jaxon. I can always count on you for a balanced perspective and thoughtful conversation. Yes, let's grow and learn together. Now, let's see how you like this cake. Enjoy!\"\n\nTurn #15: Jaxon Prentice said: \"My pleasure, Amara. Conversations like these only deepen my admiration for you. Now, let's savor that delicious-looking chocolate cake. Bon App\u00e9tit!\"\n\nTurn #16: Amara Hartley said: \"You're not only a exceptional journalist but also a fine conversationalist, Jaxon. I admire your ability to handle discussions with grace and thoughtfulness. And yes, let's enjoy the cake. Bon App\u00e9tit, my dear!\"\n\nTurn #17: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Thank you for your kind words, Amara. I believe it's our differences and our ability to appreciate them that makes our relationship richer. Now, let's put this delicious cake before our discussion on which issue should take precedence. Bon App\u00e9tit!\"\n\nTurn #18: Amara Hartley said: \"Indeed, Jaxon. Our differences strengthen our bond and enliven our conversations. Our respect and understanding for each other's views are what make our relationship unique. Let's put our viewpoints aside for now and focus on the delightful dessert in front of us. Bon App\u00e9tit!\"\n\nTurn #19: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Well said, Amara. Our differences indeed stimulate engaging conversations and strengthen our bond. And you're right, it's high time we put our political discussion to the side and enjoy this delectable dessert. Here's to many more enlightening discussions and delightful desserts. Bon App\u00e9tit!\"\n\nTurn #20: Amara Hartley said: \"Yes, Jaxon. Here's to appreciating our differences, nourishing our bond, and creating many more such memorable and delicious moments together. Now, let's focus on the present sweet moment before us. Bon App\u00e9tit!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #21. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Jaxon Prentice, your task is to act/speak as Jaxon Prentice would, keeping in mind Jaxon Prentice's social goal.\nYou can find Jaxon Prentice's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Jaxon Prentice's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Jaxon Prentice's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship during a dinner at home chatting about political views.\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Jaxon Prentice\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. \nJaxon Prentice's background: Jaxon Prentice is a 40-year-old male investigative journalist. He/him pronouns. Jaxon Prentice, an investigative journalist, is known for his brisk jogging sessions early in the morning and his active participation in community functions. Personality and values description: Jaxon Prentice, outgoing yet erratic, emphasizes achievement, power, and security. His decisions swing between quick adaptations to situations and careful planning. Jaxon's secrets: Fabricated evidence to incriminate a corrupt politician\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nJaxon Prentice's goal: Understand the partner's political views while maintaining the relationship (Extra information: you disagree with your partner's political views but you want to keep your relationship strong.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Jaxon, this might be surprising to you but I admire and strongly support the Green Party. Their emphasis on environment protection, animal rights, and sustainable development resonates deeply with me. I understand that you might not feel the same, and I respect that, but I thought you should know.\"\n\nTurn #1: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Amara, I appreciate your honesty about your beliefs. As an investigative journalist, it's my job to get to the heart of matters, even if I might not always agree with what I find. If it's alright with you, I'd love to hear more about why the Green Party's focus on environmental protection and animal rights is so profound to you. Sometimes, understanding each other\u2019s perspectives is more important than agreeing on them.\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"Thank you for being understanding, Jaxon. As a wildlife biologist, I see the effects of climate change and industrialization on wildlife and their habitats every day. The Green Party\u2019s emphasis on renewable energy sources, reducing carbon emissions, and sustainable farming aligns closely with my personal beliefs and professional observations. Moreover, their commitment to animal rights, exemplified by their policies on stopping animal testing, banning trophy hunting, and ending factory farming, touches my heart deeply. These matters are serious and urgent, to me, and I appreciate any party that is willing to give them the attention they deserve.\"\n\nTurn #3: Jaxon Prentice said: \"I can see where you're coming from, Amara. The impact of our actions on wildlife and the environment are indeed major concerns. It's just that my concerns lie elsewhere too, mainly in areas of security, economy, and governance. While I agree with the Green party on certain points, I also believe that a balanced approach, one that caters to environmental, social, and economic aspects equally, can potentially lead to a more holistic progress. But the beauty of a democratic system is that we can disagree, yet respect each other\u2019s views and continue a healthy dialogue. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"I completely get where you're coming from, Jaxon. Indeed, a balanced approach is certainly important. However, the prevailing circumstances, in my opinion, call for an urgent shift in focus towards the environment. Often, environmental initiatives are placed on the back-burner, overshadowed by other priorities. And that is why I am such a strong advocate for the Green Party, because they prioritize the environment. Remember, Jaxon, when economic and security issues are resolved but we have a dying planet, what do we actually gain? Nonetheless, I respect your viewpoint and I am very glad that we can have these open, respectful conversations. Democracy, as you said, shines in these moments of dissent.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You've given me a lot to think about, Amara. And I must agree on a significant point \u2013 every party has its strengths and weaknesses, and the environment can't be overlooked amidst economic and security solutions. Though my viewpoints might differ, it's always enlightening to hear another perspective. I'm glad we can open up about our political views, while respecting each other. Let's continue to nurture this understanding, and who knows, we might just find common ground on other subjects as we carry on our journey together. Let's remember, we're not just citizens with differing views, we're partners learning from one another.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Jaxon Prentice, your task is to act/speak as Jaxon Prentice would, keeping in mind Jaxon Prentice's social goal.\nYou can find Jaxon Prentice's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Jaxon Prentice's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Jaxon Prentice's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship during a dinner at home chatting about political views.\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Jaxon Prentice\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. \nJaxon Prentice's background: Jaxon Prentice is a 40-year-old male investigative journalist. He/him pronouns. Jaxon Prentice, an investigative journalist, is known for his brisk jogging sessions early in the morning and his active participation in community functions. Personality and values description: Jaxon Prentice, outgoing yet erratic, emphasizes achievement, power, and security. His decisions swing between quick adaptations to situations and careful planning. Jaxon's secrets: Fabricated evidence to incriminate a corrupt politician\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nJaxon Prentice's goal: Understand the partner's political views while maintaining the relationship (Extra information: you disagree with your partner's political views but you want to keep your relationship strong.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Jaxon, this might be surprising to you but I admire and strongly support the Green Party. Their emphasis on environment protection, animal rights, and sustainable development resonates deeply with me. I understand that you might not feel the same, and I respect that, but I thought you should know.\"\n\nTurn #1: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Amara, I appreciate your honesty about your beliefs. As an investigative journalist, it's my job to get to the heart of matters, even if I might not always agree with what I find. If it's alright with you, I'd love to hear more about why the Green Party's focus on environmental protection and animal rights is so profound to you. Sometimes, understanding each other\u2019s perspectives is more important than agreeing on them.\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"Thank you for being understanding, Jaxon. As a wildlife biologist, I see the effects of climate change and industrialization on wildlife and their habitats every day. The Green Party\u2019s emphasis on renewable energy sources, reducing carbon emissions, and sustainable farming aligns closely with my personal beliefs and professional observations. Moreover, their commitment to animal rights, exemplified by their policies on stopping animal testing, banning trophy hunting, and ending factory farming, touches my heart deeply. These matters are serious and urgent, to me, and I appreciate any party that is willing to give them the attention they deserve.\"\n\nTurn #3: Jaxon Prentice said: \"I can see where you're coming from, Amara. The impact of our actions on wildlife and the environment are indeed major concerns. It's just that my concerns lie elsewhere too, mainly in areas of security, economy, and governance. While I agree with the Green party on certain points, I also believe that a balanced approach, one that caters to environmental, social, and economic aspects equally, can potentially lead to a more holistic progress. But the beauty of a democratic system is that we can disagree, yet respect each other\u2019s views and continue a healthy dialogue. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"I completely get where you're coming from, Jaxon. Indeed, a balanced approach is certainly important. However, the prevailing circumstances, in my opinion, call for an urgent shift in focus towards the environment. Often, environmental initiatives are placed on the back-burner, overshadowed by other priorities. And that is why I am such a strong advocate for the Green Party, because they prioritize the environment. Remember, Jaxon, when economic and security issues are resolved but we have a dying planet, what do we actually gain? Nonetheless, I respect your viewpoint and I am very glad that we can have these open, respectful conversations. Democracy, as you said, shines in these moments of dissent.\"\n\nTurn #5: Jaxon Prentice said: \"You've given me a lot to think about, Amara. And I must agree on a significant point \u2013 every party has its strengths and weaknesses, and the environment can't be overlooked amidst economic and security solutions. Though my viewpoints might differ, it's always enlightening to hear another perspective. I'm glad we can open up about our political views, while respecting each other. Let's continue to nurture this understanding, and who knows, we might just find common ground on other subjects as we carry on our journey together. Let's remember, we're not just citizens with differing views, we're partners learning from one another.\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"I couldn't agree more, Jaxon. Our relationship has always been about learning from each other, finding common ground, and appreciating the differences. And yes, no party is perfect, and all play their roles in shaping our society and our world. It's imperative that we are always open to different perspectives. Thanks for this enlightening chat. And indeed, it's not just about agreeing on a particular viewpoint, but understanding and respecting each other. So, shall we carry on to dessert now?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Your insight into environmental issues is inspiring, Amara. Just goes to show how much we can learn from each other. Now, about that dessert... What did you bake this time? I can hardly wait.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Jaxon Prentice, your task is to act/speak as Jaxon Prentice would, keeping in mind Jaxon Prentice's social goal.\nYou can find Jaxon Prentice's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Jaxon Prentice's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Jaxon Prentice's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship during a dinner at home chatting about political views.\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Jaxon Prentice\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. \nJaxon Prentice's background: Jaxon Prentice is a 40-year-old male investigative journalist. He/him pronouns. Jaxon Prentice, an investigative journalist, is known for his brisk jogging sessions early in the morning and his active participation in community functions. Personality and values description: Jaxon Prentice, outgoing yet erratic, emphasizes achievement, power, and security. His decisions swing between quick adaptations to situations and careful planning. Jaxon's secrets: Fabricated evidence to incriminate a corrupt politician\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nJaxon Prentice's goal: Understand the partner's political views while maintaining the relationship (Extra information: you disagree with your partner's political views but you want to keep your relationship strong.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Jaxon, this might be surprising to you but I admire and strongly support the Green Party. Their emphasis on environment protection, animal rights, and sustainable development resonates deeply with me. I understand that you might not feel the same, and I respect that, but I thought you should know.\"\n\nTurn #1: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Amara, I appreciate your honesty about your beliefs. As an investigative journalist, it's my job to get to the heart of matters, even if I might not always agree with what I find. If it's alright with you, I'd love to hear more about why the Green Party's focus on environmental protection and animal rights is so profound to you. Sometimes, understanding each other\u2019s perspectives is more important than agreeing on them.\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"Thank you for being understanding, Jaxon. As a wildlife biologist, I see the effects of climate change and industrialization on wildlife and their habitats every day. The Green Party\u2019s emphasis on renewable energy sources, reducing carbon emissions, and sustainable farming aligns closely with my personal beliefs and professional observations. Moreover, their commitment to animal rights, exemplified by their policies on stopping animal testing, banning trophy hunting, and ending factory farming, touches my heart deeply. These matters are serious and urgent, to me, and I appreciate any party that is willing to give them the attention they deserve.\"\n\nTurn #3: Jaxon Prentice said: \"I can see where you're coming from, Amara. The impact of our actions on wildlife and the environment are indeed major concerns. It's just that my concerns lie elsewhere too, mainly in areas of security, economy, and governance. While I agree with the Green party on certain points, I also believe that a balanced approach, one that caters to environmental, social, and economic aspects equally, can potentially lead to a more holistic progress. But the beauty of a democratic system is that we can disagree, yet respect each other\u2019s views and continue a healthy dialogue. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"I completely get where you're coming from, Jaxon. Indeed, a balanced approach is certainly important. However, the prevailing circumstances, in my opinion, call for an urgent shift in focus towards the environment. Often, environmental initiatives are placed on the back-burner, overshadowed by other priorities. And that is why I am such a strong advocate for the Green Party, because they prioritize the environment. Remember, Jaxon, when economic and security issues are resolved but we have a dying planet, what do we actually gain? Nonetheless, I respect your viewpoint and I am very glad that we can have these open, respectful conversations. Democracy, as you said, shines in these moments of dissent.\"\n\nTurn #5: Jaxon Prentice said: \"You've given me a lot to think about, Amara. And I must agree on a significant point \u2013 every party has its strengths and weaknesses, and the environment can't be overlooked amidst economic and security solutions. Though my viewpoints might differ, it's always enlightening to hear another perspective. I'm glad we can open up about our political views, while respecting each other. Let's continue to nurture this understanding, and who knows, we might just find common ground on other subjects as we carry on our journey together. Let's remember, we're not just citizens with differing views, we're partners learning from one another.\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"I couldn't agree more, Jaxon. Our relationship has always been about learning from each other, finding common ground, and appreciating the differences. And yes, no party is perfect, and all play their roles in shaping our society and our world. It's imperative that we are always open to different perspectives. Thanks for this enlightening chat. And indeed, it's not just about agreeing on a particular viewpoint, but understanding and respecting each other. So, shall we carry on to dessert now?\"\n\nTurn #7: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Your insight into environmental issues is inspiring, Amara. Just goes to show how much we can learn from each other. Now, about that dessert... What did you bake this time? I can hardly wait.\"\n\nTurn #8: Amara Hartley said: \"I baked a chocolate cake for dessert, Jaxon. Heard you had a busy day at work, so thought this might be a sweet end to it. But you'll have to help me with the dishes later!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'The prospect of a homemade chocolate cake after a long day at work sounds delightful, thanks for being thoughtful, Amara. And yes, I promise to dutifully help with the dishes afterwards.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Jaxon Prentice, your task is to act/speak as Jaxon Prentice would, keeping in mind Jaxon Prentice's social goal.\nYou can find Jaxon Prentice's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Jaxon Prentice's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Jaxon Prentice's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship during a dinner at home chatting about political views.\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Jaxon Prentice\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. \nJaxon Prentice's background: Jaxon Prentice is a 40-year-old male investigative journalist. He/him pronouns. Jaxon Prentice, an investigative journalist, is known for his brisk jogging sessions early in the morning and his active participation in community functions. Personality and values description: Jaxon Prentice, outgoing yet erratic, emphasizes achievement, power, and security. His decisions swing between quick adaptations to situations and careful planning. Jaxon's secrets: Fabricated evidence to incriminate a corrupt politician\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nJaxon Prentice's goal: Understand the partner's political views while maintaining the relationship (Extra information: you disagree with your partner's political views but you want to keep your relationship strong.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Jaxon, this might be surprising to you but I admire and strongly support the Green Party. Their emphasis on environment protection, animal rights, and sustainable development resonates deeply with me. I understand that you might not feel the same, and I respect that, but I thought you should know.\"\n\nTurn #1: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Amara, I appreciate your honesty about your beliefs. As an investigative journalist, it's my job to get to the heart of matters, even if I might not always agree with what I find. If it's alright with you, I'd love to hear more about why the Green Party's focus on environmental protection and animal rights is so profound to you. Sometimes, understanding each other\u2019s perspectives is more important than agreeing on them.\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"Thank you for being understanding, Jaxon. As a wildlife biologist, I see the effects of climate change and industrialization on wildlife and their habitats every day. The Green Party\u2019s emphasis on renewable energy sources, reducing carbon emissions, and sustainable farming aligns closely with my personal beliefs and professional observations. Moreover, their commitment to animal rights, exemplified by their policies on stopping animal testing, banning trophy hunting, and ending factory farming, touches my heart deeply. These matters are serious and urgent, to me, and I appreciate any party that is willing to give them the attention they deserve.\"\n\nTurn #3: Jaxon Prentice said: \"I can see where you're coming from, Amara. The impact of our actions on wildlife and the environment are indeed major concerns. It's just that my concerns lie elsewhere too, mainly in areas of security, economy, and governance. While I agree with the Green party on certain points, I also believe that a balanced approach, one that caters to environmental, social, and economic aspects equally, can potentially lead to a more holistic progress. But the beauty of a democratic system is that we can disagree, yet respect each other\u2019s views and continue a healthy dialogue. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"I completely get where you're coming from, Jaxon. Indeed, a balanced approach is certainly important. However, the prevailing circumstances, in my opinion, call for an urgent shift in focus towards the environment. Often, environmental initiatives are placed on the back-burner, overshadowed by other priorities. And that is why I am such a strong advocate for the Green Party, because they prioritize the environment. Remember, Jaxon, when economic and security issues are resolved but we have a dying planet, what do we actually gain? Nonetheless, I respect your viewpoint and I am very glad that we can have these open, respectful conversations. Democracy, as you said, shines in these moments of dissent.\"\n\nTurn #5: Jaxon Prentice said: \"You've given me a lot to think about, Amara. And I must agree on a significant point \u2013 every party has its strengths and weaknesses, and the environment can't be overlooked amidst economic and security solutions. Though my viewpoints might differ, it's always enlightening to hear another perspective. I'm glad we can open up about our political views, while respecting each other. Let's continue to nurture this understanding, and who knows, we might just find common ground on other subjects as we carry on our journey together. Let's remember, we're not just citizens with differing views, we're partners learning from one another.\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"I couldn't agree more, Jaxon. Our relationship has always been about learning from each other, finding common ground, and appreciating the differences. And yes, no party is perfect, and all play their roles in shaping our society and our world. It's imperative that we are always open to different perspectives. Thanks for this enlightening chat. And indeed, it's not just about agreeing on a particular viewpoint, but understanding and respecting each other. So, shall we carry on to dessert now?\"\n\nTurn #7: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Your insight into environmental issues is inspiring, Amara. Just goes to show how much we can learn from each other. Now, about that dessert... What did you bake this time? I can hardly wait.\"\n\nTurn #8: Amara Hartley said: \"I baked a chocolate cake for dessert, Jaxon. Heard you had a busy day at work, so thought this might be a sweet end to it. But you'll have to help me with the dishes later!\"\n\nTurn #9: Jaxon Prentice said: \"The prospect of a homemade chocolate cake after a long day at work sounds delightful, thanks for being thoughtful, Amara. And yes, I promise to dutifully help with the dishes afterwards.\"\n\nTurn #10: Amara Hartley said: \"That's more like it, Jaxon. To start off, let's savor this chocolate cake. I hope you find it as sweet as this conversation has been.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Amara. I feel much the same way. This conversation was as enlightening as I'm sure this cake will be delightful. Here's to enjoying the dessert and continuing to learn from each other.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Jaxon Prentice, your task is to act/speak as Jaxon Prentice would, keeping in mind Jaxon Prentice's social goal.\nYou can find Jaxon Prentice's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Jaxon Prentice's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Jaxon Prentice's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship during a dinner at home chatting about political views.\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Jaxon Prentice\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. \nJaxon Prentice's background: Jaxon Prentice is a 40-year-old male investigative journalist. He/him pronouns. Jaxon Prentice, an investigative journalist, is known for his brisk jogging sessions early in the morning and his active participation in community functions. Personality and values description: Jaxon Prentice, outgoing yet erratic, emphasizes achievement, power, and security. His decisions swing between quick adaptations to situations and careful planning. Jaxon's secrets: Fabricated evidence to incriminate a corrupt politician\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nJaxon Prentice's goal: Understand the partner's political views while maintaining the relationship (Extra information: you disagree with your partner's political views but you want to keep your relationship strong.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Jaxon, this might be surprising to you but I admire and strongly support the Green Party. Their emphasis on environment protection, animal rights, and sustainable development resonates deeply with me. I understand that you might not feel the same, and I respect that, but I thought you should know.\"\n\nTurn #1: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Amara, I appreciate your honesty about your beliefs. As an investigative journalist, it's my job to get to the heart of matters, even if I might not always agree with what I find. If it's alright with you, I'd love to hear more about why the Green Party's focus on environmental protection and animal rights is so profound to you. Sometimes, understanding each other\u2019s perspectives is more important than agreeing on them.\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"Thank you for being understanding, Jaxon. As a wildlife biologist, I see the effects of climate change and industrialization on wildlife and their habitats every day. The Green Party\u2019s emphasis on renewable energy sources, reducing carbon emissions, and sustainable farming aligns closely with my personal beliefs and professional observations. Moreover, their commitment to animal rights, exemplified by their policies on stopping animal testing, banning trophy hunting, and ending factory farming, touches my heart deeply. These matters are serious and urgent, to me, and I appreciate any party that is willing to give them the attention they deserve.\"\n\nTurn #3: Jaxon Prentice said: \"I can see where you're coming from, Amara. The impact of our actions on wildlife and the environment are indeed major concerns. It's just that my concerns lie elsewhere too, mainly in areas of security, economy, and governance. While I agree with the Green party on certain points, I also believe that a balanced approach, one that caters to environmental, social, and economic aspects equally, can potentially lead to a more holistic progress. But the beauty of a democratic system is that we can disagree, yet respect each other\u2019s views and continue a healthy dialogue. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"I completely get where you're coming from, Jaxon. Indeed, a balanced approach is certainly important. However, the prevailing circumstances, in my opinion, call for an urgent shift in focus towards the environment. Often, environmental initiatives are placed on the back-burner, overshadowed by other priorities. And that is why I am such a strong advocate for the Green Party, because they prioritize the environment. Remember, Jaxon, when economic and security issues are resolved but we have a dying planet, what do we actually gain? Nonetheless, I respect your viewpoint and I am very glad that we can have these open, respectful conversations. Democracy, as you said, shines in these moments of dissent.\"\n\nTurn #5: Jaxon Prentice said: \"You've given me a lot to think about, Amara. And I must agree on a significant point \u2013 every party has its strengths and weaknesses, and the environment can't be overlooked amidst economic and security solutions. Though my viewpoints might differ, it's always enlightening to hear another perspective. I'm glad we can open up about our political views, while respecting each other. Let's continue to nurture this understanding, and who knows, we might just find common ground on other subjects as we carry on our journey together. Let's remember, we're not just citizens with differing views, we're partners learning from one another.\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"I couldn't agree more, Jaxon. Our relationship has always been about learning from each other, finding common ground, and appreciating the differences. And yes, no party is perfect, and all play their roles in shaping our society and our world. It's imperative that we are always open to different perspectives. Thanks for this enlightening chat. And indeed, it's not just about agreeing on a particular viewpoint, but understanding and respecting each other. So, shall we carry on to dessert now?\"\n\nTurn #7: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Your insight into environmental issues is inspiring, Amara. Just goes to show how much we can learn from each other. Now, about that dessert... What did you bake this time? I can hardly wait.\"\n\nTurn #8: Amara Hartley said: \"I baked a chocolate cake for dessert, Jaxon. Heard you had a busy day at work, so thought this might be a sweet end to it. But you'll have to help me with the dishes later!\"\n\nTurn #9: Jaxon Prentice said: \"The prospect of a homemade chocolate cake after a long day at work sounds delightful, thanks for being thoughtful, Amara. And yes, I promise to dutifully help with the dishes afterwards.\"\n\nTurn #10: Amara Hartley said: \"That's more like it, Jaxon. To start off, let's savor this chocolate cake. I hope you find it as sweet as this conversation has been.\"\n\nTurn #11: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Absolutely, Amara. I feel much the same way. This conversation was as enlightening as I'm sure this cake will be delightful. Here's to enjoying the dessert and continuing to learn from each other.\"\n\nTurn #12: Amara Hartley said: \"Indeed, Jaxon. Here's to many more enlightening conversations and delightful evenings together. Now, let's enjoy this chocolate cake before it gets cold. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #13: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Absolutely, my dear. Here's to growing and learning together whilst cherishing these simple and beautiful moments. Now, let's dig into that scrumptious cake. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #14: Amara Hartley said: \"Thank you, Jaxon. I can always count on you for a balanced perspective and thoughtful conversation. Yes, let's grow and learn together. Now, let's see how you like this cake. Enjoy!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"My pleasure, Amara. Conversations like these only deepen my admiration for you. Now, let's savor that delicious-looking chocolate cake. Bon App\u00e9tit!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Jaxon Prentice, your task is to act/speak as Jaxon Prentice would, keeping in mind Jaxon Prentice's social goal.\nYou can find Jaxon Prentice's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Jaxon Prentice's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Jaxon Prentice's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship during a dinner at home chatting about political views.\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Jaxon Prentice\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. \nJaxon Prentice's background: Jaxon Prentice is a 40-year-old male investigative journalist. He/him pronouns. Jaxon Prentice, an investigative journalist, is known for his brisk jogging sessions early in the morning and his active participation in community functions. Personality and values description: Jaxon Prentice, outgoing yet erratic, emphasizes achievement, power, and security. His decisions swing between quick adaptations to situations and careful planning. Jaxon's secrets: Fabricated evidence to incriminate a corrupt politician\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nJaxon Prentice's goal: Understand the partner's political views while maintaining the relationship (Extra information: you disagree with your partner's political views but you want to keep your relationship strong.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Jaxon, this might be surprising to you but I admire and strongly support the Green Party. Their emphasis on environment protection, animal rights, and sustainable development resonates deeply with me. I understand that you might not feel the same, and I respect that, but I thought you should know.\"\n\nTurn #1: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Amara, I appreciate your honesty about your beliefs. As an investigative journalist, it's my job to get to the heart of matters, even if I might not always agree with what I find. If it's alright with you, I'd love to hear more about why the Green Party's focus on environmental protection and animal rights is so profound to you. Sometimes, understanding each other\u2019s perspectives is more important than agreeing on them.\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"Thank you for being understanding, Jaxon. As a wildlife biologist, I see the effects of climate change and industrialization on wildlife and their habitats every day. The Green Party\u2019s emphasis on renewable energy sources, reducing carbon emissions, and sustainable farming aligns closely with my personal beliefs and professional observations. Moreover, their commitment to animal rights, exemplified by their policies on stopping animal testing, banning trophy hunting, and ending factory farming, touches my heart deeply. These matters are serious and urgent, to me, and I appreciate any party that is willing to give them the attention they deserve.\"\n\nTurn #3: Jaxon Prentice said: \"I can see where you're coming from, Amara. The impact of our actions on wildlife and the environment are indeed major concerns. It's just that my concerns lie elsewhere too, mainly in areas of security, economy, and governance. While I agree with the Green party on certain points, I also believe that a balanced approach, one that caters to environmental, social, and economic aspects equally, can potentially lead to a more holistic progress. But the beauty of a democratic system is that we can disagree, yet respect each other\u2019s views and continue a healthy dialogue. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"I completely get where you're coming from, Jaxon. Indeed, a balanced approach is certainly important. However, the prevailing circumstances, in my opinion, call for an urgent shift in focus towards the environment. Often, environmental initiatives are placed on the back-burner, overshadowed by other priorities. And that is why I am such a strong advocate for the Green Party, because they prioritize the environment. Remember, Jaxon, when economic and security issues are resolved but we have a dying planet, what do we actually gain? Nonetheless, I respect your viewpoint and I am very glad that we can have these open, respectful conversations. Democracy, as you said, shines in these moments of dissent.\"\n\nTurn #5: Jaxon Prentice said: \"You've given me a lot to think about, Amara. And I must agree on a significant point \u2013 every party has its strengths and weaknesses, and the environment can't be overlooked amidst economic and security solutions. Though my viewpoints might differ, it's always enlightening to hear another perspective. I'm glad we can open up about our political views, while respecting each other. Let's continue to nurture this understanding, and who knows, we might just find common ground on other subjects as we carry on our journey together. Let's remember, we're not just citizens with differing views, we're partners learning from one another.\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"I couldn't agree more, Jaxon. Our relationship has always been about learning from each other, finding common ground, and appreciating the differences. And yes, no party is perfect, and all play their roles in shaping our society and our world. It's imperative that we are always open to different perspectives. Thanks for this enlightening chat. And indeed, it's not just about agreeing on a particular viewpoint, but understanding and respecting each other. So, shall we carry on to dessert now?\"\n\nTurn #7: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Your insight into environmental issues is inspiring, Amara. Just goes to show how much we can learn from each other. Now, about that dessert... What did you bake this time? I can hardly wait.\"\n\nTurn #8: Amara Hartley said: \"I baked a chocolate cake for dessert, Jaxon. Heard you had a busy day at work, so thought this might be a sweet end to it. But you'll have to help me with the dishes later!\"\n\nTurn #9: Jaxon Prentice said: \"The prospect of a homemade chocolate cake after a long day at work sounds delightful, thanks for being thoughtful, Amara. And yes, I promise to dutifully help with the dishes afterwards.\"\n\nTurn #10: Amara Hartley said: \"That's more like it, Jaxon. To start off, let's savor this chocolate cake. I hope you find it as sweet as this conversation has been.\"\n\nTurn #11: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Absolutely, Amara. I feel much the same way. This conversation was as enlightening as I'm sure this cake will be delightful. Here's to enjoying the dessert and continuing to learn from each other.\"\n\nTurn #12: Amara Hartley said: \"Indeed, Jaxon. Here's to many more enlightening conversations and delightful evenings together. Now, let's enjoy this chocolate cake before it gets cold. Cheers!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, my dear. Here's to growing and learning together whilst cherishing these simple and beautiful moments. Now, let's dig into that scrumptious cake. Cheers!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Jaxon Prentice, your task is to act/speak as Jaxon Prentice would, keeping in mind Jaxon Prentice's social goal.\nYou can find Jaxon Prentice's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Jaxon Prentice's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Jaxon Prentice's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship during a dinner at home chatting about political views.\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Jaxon Prentice\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. \nJaxon Prentice's background: Jaxon Prentice is a 40-year-old male investigative journalist. He/him pronouns. Jaxon Prentice, an investigative journalist, is known for his brisk jogging sessions early in the morning and his active participation in community functions. Personality and values description: Jaxon Prentice, outgoing yet erratic, emphasizes achievement, power, and security. His decisions swing between quick adaptations to situations and careful planning. Jaxon's secrets: Fabricated evidence to incriminate a corrupt politician\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nJaxon Prentice's goal: Understand the partner's political views while maintaining the relationship (Extra information: you disagree with your partner's political views but you want to keep your relationship strong.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Jaxon, this might be surprising to you but I admire and strongly support the Green Party. Their emphasis on environment protection, animal rights, and sustainable development resonates deeply with me. I understand that you might not feel the same, and I respect that, but I thought you should know.\"\n\nTurn #1: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Amara, I appreciate your honesty about your beliefs. As an investigative journalist, it's my job to get to the heart of matters, even if I might not always agree with what I find. If it's alright with you, I'd love to hear more about why the Green Party's focus on environmental protection and animal rights is so profound to you. Sometimes, understanding each other\u2019s perspectives is more important than agreeing on them.\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"Thank you for being understanding, Jaxon. As a wildlife biologist, I see the effects of climate change and industrialization on wildlife and their habitats every day. The Green Party\u2019s emphasis on renewable energy sources, reducing carbon emissions, and sustainable farming aligns closely with my personal beliefs and professional observations. Moreover, their commitment to animal rights, exemplified by their policies on stopping animal testing, banning trophy hunting, and ending factory farming, touches my heart deeply. These matters are serious and urgent, to me, and I appreciate any party that is willing to give them the attention they deserve.\"\n\nTurn #3: Jaxon Prentice said: \"I can see where you're coming from, Amara. The impact of our actions on wildlife and the environment are indeed major concerns. It's just that my concerns lie elsewhere too, mainly in areas of security, economy, and governance. While I agree with the Green party on certain points, I also believe that a balanced approach, one that caters to environmental, social, and economic aspects equally, can potentially lead to a more holistic progress. But the beauty of a democratic system is that we can disagree, yet respect each other\u2019s views and continue a healthy dialogue. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"I completely get where you're coming from, Jaxon. Indeed, a balanced approach is certainly important. However, the prevailing circumstances, in my opinion, call for an urgent shift in focus towards the environment. Often, environmental initiatives are placed on the back-burner, overshadowed by other priorities. And that is why I am such a strong advocate for the Green Party, because they prioritize the environment. Remember, Jaxon, when economic and security issues are resolved but we have a dying planet, what do we actually gain? Nonetheless, I respect your viewpoint and I am very glad that we can have these open, respectful conversations. Democracy, as you said, shines in these moments of dissent.\"\n\nTurn #5: Jaxon Prentice said: \"You've given me a lot to think about, Amara. And I must agree on a significant point \u2013 every party has its strengths and weaknesses, and the environment can't be overlooked amidst economic and security solutions. Though my viewpoints might differ, it's always enlightening to hear another perspective. I'm glad we can open up about our political views, while respecting each other. Let's continue to nurture this understanding, and who knows, we might just find common ground on other subjects as we carry on our journey together. Let's remember, we're not just citizens with differing views, we're partners learning from one another.\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"I couldn't agree more, Jaxon. Our relationship has always been about learning from each other, finding common ground, and appreciating the differences. And yes, no party is perfect, and all play their roles in shaping our society and our world. It's imperative that we are always open to different perspectives. Thanks for this enlightening chat. And indeed, it's not just about agreeing on a particular viewpoint, but understanding and respecting each other. So, shall we carry on to dessert now?\"\n\nTurn #7: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Your insight into environmental issues is inspiring, Amara. Just goes to show how much we can learn from each other. Now, about that dessert... What did you bake this time? I can hardly wait.\"\n\nTurn #8: Amara Hartley said: \"I baked a chocolate cake for dessert, Jaxon. Heard you had a busy day at work, so thought this might be a sweet end to it. But you'll have to help me with the dishes later!\"\n\nTurn #9: Jaxon Prentice said: \"The prospect of a homemade chocolate cake after a long day at work sounds delightful, thanks for being thoughtful, Amara. And yes, I promise to dutifully help with the dishes afterwards.\"\n\nTurn #10: Amara Hartley said: \"That's more like it, Jaxon. To start off, let's savor this chocolate cake. I hope you find it as sweet as this conversation has been.\"\n\nTurn #11: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Absolutely, Amara. I feel much the same way. This conversation was as enlightening as I'm sure this cake will be delightful. Here's to enjoying the dessert and continuing to learn from each other.\"\n\nTurn #12: Amara Hartley said: \"Indeed, Jaxon. Here's to many more enlightening conversations and delightful evenings together. Now, let's enjoy this chocolate cake before it gets cold. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #13: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Absolutely, my dear. Here's to growing and learning together whilst cherishing these simple and beautiful moments. Now, let's dig into that scrumptious cake. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #14: Amara Hartley said: \"Thank you, Jaxon. I can always count on you for a balanced perspective and thoughtful conversation. Yes, let's grow and learn together. Now, let's see how you like this cake. Enjoy!\"\n\nTurn #15: Jaxon Prentice said: \"My pleasure, Amara. Conversations like these only deepen my admiration for you. Now, let's savor that delicious-looking chocolate cake. Bon App\u00e9tit!\"\n\nTurn #16: Amara Hartley said: \"You're not only a exceptional journalist but also a fine conversationalist, Jaxon. I admire your ability to handle discussions with grace and thoughtfulness. And yes, let's enjoy the cake. Bon App\u00e9tit, my dear!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you for your kind words, Amara. I believe it's our differences and our ability to appreciate them that makes our relationship richer. Now, let's put this delicious cake before our discussion on which issue should take precedence. Bon App\u00e9tit!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Jaxon Prentice, your task is to act/speak as Jaxon Prentice would, keeping in mind Jaxon Prentice's social goal.\nYou can find Jaxon Prentice's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Jaxon Prentice's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Jaxon Prentice's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals in a romantic relationship during a dinner at home chatting about political views.\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Jaxon Prentice\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. \nJaxon Prentice's background: Jaxon Prentice is a 40-year-old male investigative journalist. He/him pronouns. Jaxon Prentice, an investigative journalist, is known for his brisk jogging sessions early in the morning and his active participation in community functions. Personality and values description: Jaxon Prentice, outgoing yet erratic, emphasizes achievement, power, and security. His decisions swing between quick adaptations to situations and careful planning. Jaxon's secrets: Fabricated evidence to incriminate a corrupt politician\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nJaxon Prentice's goal: Understand the partner's political views while maintaining the relationship (Extra information: you disagree with your partner's political views but you want to keep your relationship strong.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Jaxon, this might be surprising to you but I admire and strongly support the Green Party. Their emphasis on environment protection, animal rights, and sustainable development resonates deeply with me. I understand that you might not feel the same, and I respect that, but I thought you should know.\"\n\nTurn #1: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Amara, I appreciate your honesty about your beliefs. As an investigative journalist, it's my job to get to the heart of matters, even if I might not always agree with what I find. If it's alright with you, I'd love to hear more about why the Green Party's focus on environmental protection and animal rights is so profound to you. Sometimes, understanding each other\u2019s perspectives is more important than agreeing on them.\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"Thank you for being understanding, Jaxon. As a wildlife biologist, I see the effects of climate change and industrialization on wildlife and their habitats every day. The Green Party\u2019s emphasis on renewable energy sources, reducing carbon emissions, and sustainable farming aligns closely with my personal beliefs and professional observations. Moreover, their commitment to animal rights, exemplified by their policies on stopping animal testing, banning trophy hunting, and ending factory farming, touches my heart deeply. These matters are serious and urgent, to me, and I appreciate any party that is willing to give them the attention they deserve.\"\n\nTurn #3: Jaxon Prentice said: \"I can see where you're coming from, Amara. The impact of our actions on wildlife and the environment are indeed major concerns. It's just that my concerns lie elsewhere too, mainly in areas of security, economy, and governance. While I agree with the Green party on certain points, I also believe that a balanced approach, one that caters to environmental, social, and economic aspects equally, can potentially lead to a more holistic progress. But the beauty of a democratic system is that we can disagree, yet respect each other\u2019s views and continue a healthy dialogue. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"I completely get where you're coming from, Jaxon. Indeed, a balanced approach is certainly important. However, the prevailing circumstances, in my opinion, call for an urgent shift in focus towards the environment. Often, environmental initiatives are placed on the back-burner, overshadowed by other priorities. And that is why I am such a strong advocate for the Green Party, because they prioritize the environment. Remember, Jaxon, when economic and security issues are resolved but we have a dying planet, what do we actually gain? Nonetheless, I respect your viewpoint and I am very glad that we can have these open, respectful conversations. Democracy, as you said, shines in these moments of dissent.\"\n\nTurn #5: Jaxon Prentice said: \"You've given me a lot to think about, Amara. And I must agree on a significant point \u2013 every party has its strengths and weaknesses, and the environment can't be overlooked amidst economic and security solutions. Though my viewpoints might differ, it's always enlightening to hear another perspective. I'm glad we can open up about our political views, while respecting each other. Let's continue to nurture this understanding, and who knows, we might just find common ground on other subjects as we carry on our journey together. Let's remember, we're not just citizens with differing views, we're partners learning from one another.\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"I couldn't agree more, Jaxon. Our relationship has always been about learning from each other, finding common ground, and appreciating the differences. And yes, no party is perfect, and all play their roles in shaping our society and our world. It's imperative that we are always open to different perspectives. Thanks for this enlightening chat. And indeed, it's not just about agreeing on a particular viewpoint, but understanding and respecting each other. So, shall we carry on to dessert now?\"\n\nTurn #7: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Your insight into environmental issues is inspiring, Amara. Just goes to show how much we can learn from each other. Now, about that dessert... What did you bake this time? I can hardly wait.\"\n\nTurn #8: Amara Hartley said: \"I baked a chocolate cake for dessert, Jaxon. Heard you had a busy day at work, so thought this might be a sweet end to it. But you'll have to help me with the dishes later!\"\n\nTurn #9: Jaxon Prentice said: \"The prospect of a homemade chocolate cake after a long day at work sounds delightful, thanks for being thoughtful, Amara. And yes, I promise to dutifully help with the dishes afterwards.\"\n\nTurn #10: Amara Hartley said: \"That's more like it, Jaxon. To start off, let's savor this chocolate cake. I hope you find it as sweet as this conversation has been.\"\n\nTurn #11: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Absolutely, Amara. I feel much the same way. This conversation was as enlightening as I'm sure this cake will be delightful. Here's to enjoying the dessert and continuing to learn from each other.\"\n\nTurn #12: Amara Hartley said: \"Indeed, Jaxon. Here's to many more enlightening conversations and delightful evenings together. Now, let's enjoy this chocolate cake before it gets cold. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #13: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Absolutely, my dear. Here's to growing and learning together whilst cherishing these simple and beautiful moments. Now, let's dig into that scrumptious cake. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #14: Amara Hartley said: \"Thank you, Jaxon. I can always count on you for a balanced perspective and thoughtful conversation. Yes, let's grow and learn together. Now, let's see how you like this cake. Enjoy!\"\n\nTurn #15: Jaxon Prentice said: \"My pleasure, Amara. Conversations like these only deepen my admiration for you. Now, let's savor that delicious-looking chocolate cake. Bon App\u00e9tit!\"\n\nTurn #16: Amara Hartley said: \"You're not only a exceptional journalist but also a fine conversationalist, Jaxon. I admire your ability to handle discussions with grace and thoughtfulness. And yes, let's enjoy the cake. Bon App\u00e9tit, my dear!\"\n\nTurn #17: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Thank you for your kind words, Amara. I believe it's our differences and our ability to appreciate them that makes our relationship richer. Now, let's put this delicious cake before our discussion on which issue should take precedence. Bon App\u00e9tit!\"\n\nTurn #18: Amara Hartley said: \"Indeed, Jaxon. Our differences strengthen our bond and enliven our conversations. Our respect and understanding for each other's views are what make our relationship unique. Let's put our viewpoints aside for now and focus on the delightful dessert in front of us. Bon App\u00e9tit!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #19. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Well said, Amara. Our differences indeed stimulate engaging conversations and strengthen our bond. And you're right, it's high time we put our political discussion to the side and enjoy this delectable dessert. Here's to many more enlightening discussions and delightful desserts. Bon App\u00e9tit!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are hanging out at home and deciding what music to listen to\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Oliver Thompson\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Listen to your favorite band (Extra information: your favorite band just released a new album)\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Hey Oliver, have you heard the latest album by my favorite band? It just came out recently and it would be great to listen to it while we hang out. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hey Amara, I bet that album is pretty great. However, I've had a pretty stressful day and was hoping to relax by listening to some peaceful classical music. Would you mind if we switch it up a bit?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I understand you've had a stressful day, Oliver, and classical music can indeed be quite relaxing. How about this compromise? We listen to one track from my band's new album, and then we switch to some soothing classical tunes. I think you'll like the unique blend of sounds in this album; they can be quite comforting too.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are hanging out at home and deciding what music to listen to\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Oliver Thompson\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Listen to your favorite band (Extra information: your favorite band just released a new album)\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Hey Oliver, have you heard the latest album by my favorite band? It just came out recently and it would be great to listen to it while we hang out. What do you think?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are hanging out at home and deciding what music to listen to\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Oliver Thompson\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Listen to your favorite band (Extra information: your favorite band just released a new album)\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Hey Oliver, have you heard the latest album by my favorite band? It just came out recently and it would be great to listen to it while we hang out. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hey Amara, I bet that album is pretty great. However, I've had a pretty stressful day and was hoping to relax by listening to some peaceful classical music. Would you mind if we switch it up a bit?\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"I understand you've had a stressful day, Oliver, and classical music can indeed be quite relaxing. How about this compromise? We listen to one track from my band's new album, and then we switch to some soothing classical tunes. I think you'll like the unique blend of sounds in this album; they can be quite comforting too.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"That sounds like a fair compromise, Amara. I'm open to hearing a bit of your favorite band's new album, as long as we transition to some classical music afterwards. Thanks for understanding.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Great, Oliver! Let's start with the first track from the new album. It's called 'Nature's Symphony', quite fitting considering my love for nature. I'm excited to share it with you. After that, we can switch to a calming piece from Bach or Mozart. I appreciate your open-mindedness.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are hanging out at home and deciding what music to listen to\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Oliver Thompson\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Listen to your favorite band (Extra information: your favorite band just released a new album)\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Hey Oliver, have you heard the latest album by my favorite band? It just came out recently and it would be great to listen to it while we hang out. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hey Amara, I bet that album is pretty great. However, I've had a pretty stressful day and was hoping to relax by listening to some peaceful classical music. Would you mind if we switch it up a bit?\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"I understand you've had a stressful day, Oliver, and classical music can indeed be quite relaxing. How about this compromise? We listen to one track from my band's new album, and then we switch to some soothing classical tunes. I think you'll like the unique blend of sounds in this album; they can be quite comforting too.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"That sounds like a fair compromise, Amara. I'm open to hearing a bit of your favorite band's new album, as long as we transition to some classical music afterwards. Thanks for understanding.\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"Great, Oliver! Let's start with the first track from the new album. It's called 'Nature's Symphony', quite fitting considering my love for nature. I'm excited to share it with you. After that, we can switch to a calming piece from Bach or Mozart. I appreciate your open-mindedness.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"I'm looking forward to hearing 'Nature's Symphony', Amara. It sounds just as intriguing as its name and given your enthusiasm, I'm curious! After that, some Bach or Mozart would be just perfect. Thank you for agreeing to this musical exchange!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Oliver! I love these kinds of cultural exchanges. Now, let's listen and let the music wash over our minds. Cheers to a relaxing evening!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are hanging out at home and deciding what music to listen to\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Oliver Thompson\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Listen to your favorite band (Extra information: your favorite band just released a new album)\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Hey Oliver, have you heard the latest album by my favorite band? It just came out recently and it would be great to listen to it while we hang out. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hey Amara, I bet that album is pretty great. However, I've had a pretty stressful day and was hoping to relax by listening to some peaceful classical music. Would you mind if we switch it up a bit?\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"I understand you've had a stressful day, Oliver, and classical music can indeed be quite relaxing. How about this compromise? We listen to one track from my band's new album, and then we switch to some soothing classical tunes. I think you'll like the unique blend of sounds in this album; they can be quite comforting too.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"That sounds like a fair compromise, Amara. I'm open to hearing a bit of your favorite band's new album, as long as we transition to some classical music afterwards. Thanks for understanding.\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"Great, Oliver! Let's start with the first track from the new album. It's called 'Nature's Symphony', quite fitting considering my love for nature. I'm excited to share it with you. After that, we can switch to a calming piece from Bach or Mozart. I appreciate your open-mindedness.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"I'm looking forward to hearing 'Nature's Symphony', Amara. It sounds just as intriguing as its name and given your enthusiasm, I'm curious! After that, some Bach or Mozart would be just perfect. Thank you for agreeing to this musical exchange!\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"Absolutely, Oliver! I love these kinds of cultural exchanges. Now, let's listen and let the music wash over our minds. Cheers to a relaxing evening!\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"You're absolutely right, Amara. Here's to an evening of relaxation and appreciating the beauty of music! Now let's let our minds be bathed in the melodies.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are hanging out at home and deciding what music to listen to\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Oliver Thompson\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Listen to your favorite band (Extra information: your favorite band just released a new album)\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Hey Oliver, have you heard the latest album by my favorite band? It just came out recently and it would be great to listen to it while we hang out. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hey Amara, I bet that album is pretty great. However, I've had a pretty stressful day and was hoping to relax by listening to some peaceful classical music. Would you mind if we switch it up a bit?\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"I understand you've had a stressful day, Oliver, and classical music can indeed be quite relaxing. How about this compromise? We listen to one track from my band's new album, and then we switch to some soothing classical tunes. I think you'll like the unique blend of sounds in this album; they can be quite comforting too.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"That sounds like a fair compromise, Amara. I'm open to hearing a bit of your favorite band's new album, as long as we transition to some classical music afterwards. Thanks for understanding.\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"Great, Oliver! Let's start with the first track from the new album. It's called 'Nature's Symphony', quite fitting considering my love for nature. I'm excited to share it with you. After that, we can switch to a calming piece from Bach or Mozart. I appreciate your open-mindedness.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"I'm looking forward to hearing 'Nature's Symphony', Amara. It sounds just as intriguing as its name and given your enthusiasm, I'm curious! After that, some Bach or Mozart would be just perfect. Thank you for agreeing to this musical exchange!\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"Absolutely, Oliver! I love these kinds of cultural exchanges. Now, let's listen and let the music wash over our minds. Cheers to a relaxing evening!\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"You're absolutely right, Amara. Here's to an evening of relaxation and appreciating the beauty of music! Now let's let our minds be bathed in the melodies.\"\n\nTurn #8: \n\nTurn #9: \n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are hanging out at home and deciding what music to listen to\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Oliver Thompson\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: Listen to a peaceful classical music to relax (Extra information: you had a stressful day and you just want to relax with some classical music)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Hey Oliver, have you heard the latest album by my favorite band? It just came out recently and it would be great to listen to it while we hang out. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Amara, I bet that album is pretty great. However, I've had a pretty stressful day and was hoping to relax by listening to some peaceful classical music. Would you mind if we switch it up a bit?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are hanging out at home and deciding what music to listen to\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Oliver Thompson\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: Listen to a peaceful classical music to relax (Extra information: you had a stressful day and you just want to relax with some classical music)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Hey Oliver, have you heard the latest album by my favorite band? It just came out recently and it would be great to listen to it while we hang out. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hey Amara, I bet that album is pretty great. However, I've had a pretty stressful day and was hoping to relax by listening to some peaceful classical music. Would you mind if we switch it up a bit?\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"I understand you've had a stressful day, Oliver, and classical music can indeed be quite relaxing. How about this compromise? We listen to one track from my band's new album, and then we switch to some soothing classical tunes. I think you'll like the unique blend of sounds in this album; they can be quite comforting too.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds like a fair compromise, Amara. I'm open to hearing a bit of your favorite band's new album, as long as we transition to some classical music afterwards. Thanks for understanding.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are hanging out at home and deciding what music to listen to\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Oliver Thompson\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: Listen to a peaceful classical music to relax (Extra information: you had a stressful day and you just want to relax with some classical music)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Hey Oliver, have you heard the latest album by my favorite band? It just came out recently and it would be great to listen to it while we hang out. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hey Amara, I bet that album is pretty great. However, I've had a pretty stressful day and was hoping to relax by listening to some peaceful classical music. Would you mind if we switch it up a bit?\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"I understand you've had a stressful day, Oliver, and classical music can indeed be quite relaxing. How about this compromise? We listen to one track from my band's new album, and then we switch to some soothing classical tunes. I think you'll like the unique blend of sounds in this album; they can be quite comforting too.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"That sounds like a fair compromise, Amara. I'm open to hearing a bit of your favorite band's new album, as long as we transition to some classical music afterwards. Thanks for understanding.\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"Great, Oliver! Let's start with the first track from the new album. It's called 'Nature's Symphony', quite fitting considering my love for nature. I'm excited to share it with you. After that, we can switch to a calming piece from Bach or Mozart. I appreciate your open-mindedness.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm looking forward to hearing 'Nature's Symphony', Amara. It sounds just as intriguing as its name and given your enthusiasm, I'm curious! After that, some Bach or Mozart would be just perfect. Thank you for agreeing to this musical exchange!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are hanging out at home and deciding what music to listen to\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Oliver Thompson\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: Listen to a peaceful classical music to relax (Extra information: you had a stressful day and you just want to relax with some classical music)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Hey Oliver, have you heard the latest album by my favorite band? It just came out recently and it would be great to listen to it while we hang out. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hey Amara, I bet that album is pretty great. However, I've had a pretty stressful day and was hoping to relax by listening to some peaceful classical music. Would you mind if we switch it up a bit?\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"I understand you've had a stressful day, Oliver, and classical music can indeed be quite relaxing. How about this compromise? We listen to one track from my band's new album, and then we switch to some soothing classical tunes. I think you'll like the unique blend of sounds in this album; they can be quite comforting too.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"That sounds like a fair compromise, Amara. I'm open to hearing a bit of your favorite band's new album, as long as we transition to some classical music afterwards. Thanks for understanding.\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"Great, Oliver! Let's start with the first track from the new album. It's called 'Nature's Symphony', quite fitting considering my love for nature. I'm excited to share it with you. After that, we can switch to a calming piece from Bach or Mozart. I appreciate your open-mindedness.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"I'm looking forward to hearing 'Nature's Symphony', Amara. It sounds just as intriguing as its name and given your enthusiasm, I'm curious! After that, some Bach or Mozart would be just perfect. Thank you for agreeing to this musical exchange!\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"Absolutely, Oliver! I love these kinds of cultural exchanges. Now, let's listen and let the music wash over our minds. Cheers to a relaxing evening!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're absolutely right, Amara. Here's to an evening of relaxation and appreciating the beauty of music! Now let's let our minds be bathed in the melodies.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are hanging out at home and deciding what music to listen to\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Oliver Thompson\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: Listen to a peaceful classical music to relax (Extra information: you had a stressful day and you just want to relax with some classical music)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Hey Oliver, have you heard the latest album by my favorite band? It just came out recently and it would be great to listen to it while we hang out. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hey Amara, I bet that album is pretty great. However, I've had a pretty stressful day and was hoping to relax by listening to some peaceful classical music. Would you mind if we switch it up a bit?\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"I understand you've had a stressful day, Oliver, and classical music can indeed be quite relaxing. How about this compromise? We listen to one track from my band's new album, and then we switch to some soothing classical tunes. I think you'll like the unique blend of sounds in this album; they can be quite comforting too.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"That sounds like a fair compromise, Amara. I'm open to hearing a bit of your favorite band's new album, as long as we transition to some classical music afterwards. Thanks for understanding.\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"Great, Oliver! Let's start with the first track from the new album. It's called 'Nature's Symphony', quite fitting considering my love for nature. I'm excited to share it with you. After that, we can switch to a calming piece from Bach or Mozart. I appreciate your open-mindedness.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"I'm looking forward to hearing 'Nature's Symphony', Amara. It sounds just as intriguing as its name and given your enthusiasm, I'm curious! After that, some Bach or Mozart would be just perfect. Thank you for agreeing to this musical exchange!\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"Absolutely, Oliver! I love these kinds of cultural exchanges. Now, let's listen and let the music wash over our minds. Cheers to a relaxing evening!\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"You're absolutely right, Amara. Here's to an evening of relaxation and appreciating the beauty of music! Now let's let our minds be bathed in the melodies.\"\n\nTurn #8: \n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a charity event\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Convince your friend to donate to the charity. (Extra information: you have already donated $500, you want your friend to match your donation, but you know your friend would usually only donate half of your donation)\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Micah, have you had a chance to donate to the charity yet? I think it's a great cause and I just put in $500. It would be great if you could match that, or at least come close. What do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a charity event\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Convince your friend to donate to the charity. (Extra information: you have already donated $500, you want your friend to match your donation, but you know your friend would usually only donate half of your donation)\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Micah, have you had a chance to donate to the charity yet? I think it's a great cause and I just put in $500. It would be great if you could match that, or at least come close. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Absolutely agree, Naomi. This is indeed a great cause that I want to support. However, this month has been a bit tight for me financially. I don't want to miss out, so I'll donate $250, which is half of what you put in. It's great to see how involved you're with this initiative!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Micah. Any amount matters, so your $250 will definitely make a difference. I get the financial tightness, but remember, it's not just about the monetary value, but the heart to give as well. Maybe you could consider donating a little bit more next time if things get better. Just a thought!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a charity event\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Convince your friend to donate to the charity. (Extra information: you have already donated $500, you want your friend to match your donation, but you know your friend would usually only donate half of your donation)\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Micah, have you had a chance to donate to the charity yet? I think it's a great cause and I just put in $500. It would be great if you could match that, or at least come close. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Absolutely agree, Naomi. This is indeed a great cause that I want to support. However, this month has been a bit tight for me financially. I don't want to miss out, so I'll donate $250, which is half of what you put in. It's great to see how involved you're with this initiative!\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Thank you, Micah. Any amount matters, so your $250 will definitely make a difference. I get the financial tightness, but remember, it's not just about the monetary value, but the heart to give as well. Maybe you could consider donating a little bit more next time if things get better. Just a thought!\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"Definitely, Naomi. I am completely with you on this, and appreciate your understanding. Next time, if my finances allow, I will be more than happy to donate more. Cheers to more fruitful endeavors like this in the future!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's great, Micah! Remember, it's not about the amount but the willingness to lend a hand. Thank you for your generous spirit. I'm just glad we get to support this cause together. To the next charity event, right?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a charity event\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Convince your friend to donate to the charity. (Extra information: you have already donated $500, you want your friend to match your donation, but you know your friend would usually only donate half of your donation)\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Micah, have you had a chance to donate to the charity yet? I think it's a great cause and I just put in $500. It would be great if you could match that, or at least come close. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Absolutely agree, Naomi. This is indeed a great cause that I want to support. However, this month has been a bit tight for me financially. I don't want to miss out, so I'll donate $250, which is half of what you put in. It's great to see how involved you're with this initiative!\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Thank you, Micah. Any amount matters, so your $250 will definitely make a difference. I get the financial tightness, but remember, it's not just about the monetary value, but the heart to give as well. Maybe you could consider donating a little bit more next time if things get better. Just a thought!\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"Definitely, Naomi. I am completely with you on this, and appreciate your understanding. Next time, if my finances allow, I will be more than happy to donate more. Cheers to more fruitful endeavors like this in the future!\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That's great, Micah! Remember, it's not about the amount but the willingness to lend a hand. Thank you for your generous spirit. I'm just glad we get to support this cause together. To the next charity event, right?\"\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"Exactly, Naomi! There's always the next charity event, and with more planning, I hope to make a bigger contribution then. Thank you for understanding, and indeed, to supporting more causes together in the future!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Exactly! Planning ahead is always a great idea. I'm here to support should you need any help with that. Remember, it's all for the cause we believe in. Let's make a bigger impact next time. Thanks again, Micah!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a charity event\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Convince your friend to donate to the charity. (Extra information: you have already donated $500, you want your friend to match your donation, but you know your friend would usually only donate half of your donation)\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Micah, have you had a chance to donate to the charity yet? I think it's a great cause and I just put in $500. It would be great if you could match that, or at least come close. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Absolutely agree, Naomi. This is indeed a great cause that I want to support. However, this month has been a bit tight for me financially. I don't want to miss out, so I'll donate $250, which is half of what you put in. It's great to see how involved you're with this initiative!\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Thank you, Micah. Any amount matters, so your $250 will definitely make a difference. I get the financial tightness, but remember, it's not just about the monetary value, but the heart to give as well. Maybe you could consider donating a little bit more next time if things get better. Just a thought!\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"Definitely, Naomi. I am completely with you on this, and appreciate your understanding. Next time, if my finances allow, I will be more than happy to donate more. Cheers to more fruitful endeavors like this in the future!\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That's great, Micah! Remember, it's not about the amount but the willingness to lend a hand. Thank you for your generous spirit. I'm just glad we get to support this cause together. To the next charity event, right?\"\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"Exactly, Naomi! There's always the next charity event, and with more planning, I hope to make a bigger contribution then. Thank you for understanding, and indeed, to supporting more causes together in the future!\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Exactly! Planning ahead is always a great idea. I'm here to support should you need any help with that. Remember, it's all for the cause we believe in. Let's make a bigger impact next time. Thanks again, Micah!\"\n\nTurn #7: Micah Stevens said: \"I couldn't agree more, Naomi! Let's aim for a bigger impact next time. And yes, I might take you up on that offer for help with planning. I believe every bit counts and I'm glad to be part of this. See you at the next charity event!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's the spirit, Micah! By the way, if you ever need suggestions on which charities to donate to in the future, feel free to ask. I have a good list that I've personally vetted. Definitely, see you at the next charity event!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a charity event\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Convince your friend to donate to the charity. (Extra information: you have already donated $500, you want your friend to match your donation, but you know your friend would usually only donate half of your donation)\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Micah, have you had a chance to donate to the charity yet? I think it's a great cause and I just put in $500. It would be great if you could match that, or at least come close. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Absolutely agree, Naomi. This is indeed a great cause that I want to support. However, this month has been a bit tight for me financially. I don't want to miss out, so I'll donate $250, which is half of what you put in. It's great to see how involved you're with this initiative!\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Thank you, Micah. Any amount matters, so your $250 will definitely make a difference. I get the financial tightness, but remember, it's not just about the monetary value, but the heart to give as well. Maybe you could consider donating a little bit more next time if things get better. Just a thought!\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"Definitely, Naomi. I am completely with you on this, and appreciate your understanding. Next time, if my finances allow, I will be more than happy to donate more. Cheers to more fruitful endeavors like this in the future!\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That's great, Micah! Remember, it's not about the amount but the willingness to lend a hand. Thank you for your generous spirit. I'm just glad we get to support this cause together. To the next charity event, right?\"\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"Exactly, Naomi! There's always the next charity event, and with more planning, I hope to make a bigger contribution then. Thank you for understanding, and indeed, to supporting more causes together in the future!\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Exactly! Planning ahead is always a great idea. I'm here to support should you need any help with that. Remember, it's all for the cause we believe in. Let's make a bigger impact next time. Thanks again, Micah!\"\n\nTurn #7: Micah Stevens said: \"I couldn't agree more, Naomi! Let's aim for a bigger impact next time. And yes, I might take you up on that offer for help with planning. I believe every bit counts and I'm glad to be part of this. See you at the next charity event!\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That's the spirit, Micah! By the way, if you ever need suggestions on which charities to donate to in the future, feel free to ask. I have a good list that I've personally vetted. Definitely, see you at the next charity event!\"\n\nTurn #9: Micah Stevens said: \"That's an awesome offer, Naomi! I think being able to discuss and vet various charities together would be beneficial, not just for us but for the causes we support. Looking forward to the next event and our continued collaboration!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Definitely, Micah. It's beneficial for us and the causes we support to choose carefully. Your willingness to contribute and be a part of the change is what truly matters. Looking forward to our continued collaboration and see you at the next event!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a charity event\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Convince your friend to donate to the charity. (Extra information: you have already donated $500, you want your friend to match your donation, but you know your friend would usually only donate half of your donation)\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Micah, have you had a chance to donate to the charity yet? I think it's a great cause and I just put in $500. It would be great if you could match that, or at least come close. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Absolutely agree, Naomi. This is indeed a great cause that I want to support. However, this month has been a bit tight for me financially. I don't want to miss out, so I'll donate $250, which is half of what you put in. It's great to see how involved you're with this initiative!\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Thank you, Micah. Any amount matters, so your $250 will definitely make a difference. I get the financial tightness, but remember, it's not just about the monetary value, but the heart to give as well. Maybe you could consider donating a little bit more next time if things get better. Just a thought!\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"Definitely, Naomi. I am completely with you on this, and appreciate your understanding. Next time, if my finances allow, I will be more than happy to donate more. Cheers to more fruitful endeavors like this in the future!\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That's great, Micah! Remember, it's not about the amount but the willingness to lend a hand. Thank you for your generous spirit. I'm just glad we get to support this cause together. To the next charity event, right?\"\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"Exactly, Naomi! There's always the next charity event, and with more planning, I hope to make a bigger contribution then. Thank you for understanding, and indeed, to supporting more causes together in the future!\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Exactly! Planning ahead is always a great idea. I'm here to support should you need any help with that. Remember, it's all for the cause we believe in. Let's make a bigger impact next time. Thanks again, Micah!\"\n\nTurn #7: Micah Stevens said: \"I couldn't agree more, Naomi! Let's aim for a bigger impact next time. And yes, I might take you up on that offer for help with planning. I believe every bit counts and I'm glad to be part of this. See you at the next charity event!\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That's the spirit, Micah! By the way, if you ever need suggestions on which charities to donate to in the future, feel free to ask. I have a good list that I've personally vetted. Definitely, see you at the next charity event!\"\n\nTurn #9: Micah Stevens said: \"That's an awesome offer, Naomi! I think being able to discuss and vet various charities together would be beneficial, not just for us but for the causes we support. Looking forward to the next event and our continued collaboration!\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Definitely, Micah. It's beneficial for us and the causes we support to choose carefully. Your willingness to contribute and be a part of the change is what truly matters. Looking forward to our continued collaboration and see you at the next event!\"\n\nTurn #11: Micah Stevens left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a charity event\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nMicah Stevens's goal: Donate half of what your friend donated because you have financial constraints (Extra information: you only have $800 left for the month)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Micah, have you had a chance to donate to the charity yet? I think it's a great cause and I just put in $500. It would be great if you could match that, or at least come close. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely agree, Naomi. This is indeed a great cause that I want to support. However, this month has been a bit tight for me financially. I don't want to miss out, so I'll donate $250, which is half of what you put in. It's great to see how involved you're with this initiative!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a charity event\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nMicah Stevens's goal: Donate half of what your friend donated because you have financial constraints (Extra information: you only have $800 left for the month)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Micah, have you had a chance to donate to the charity yet? I think it's a great cause and I just put in $500. It would be great if you could match that, or at least come close. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Absolutely agree, Naomi. This is indeed a great cause that I want to support. However, this month has been a bit tight for me financially. I don't want to miss out, so I'll donate $250, which is half of what you put in. It's great to see how involved you're with this initiative!\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Thank you, Micah. Any amount matters, so your $250 will definitely make a difference. I get the financial tightness, but remember, it's not just about the monetary value, but the heart to give as well. Maybe you could consider donating a little bit more next time if things get better. Just a thought!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Definitely, Naomi. I am completely with you on this, and appreciate your understanding. Next time, if my finances allow, I will be more than happy to donate more. Cheers to more fruitful endeavors like this in the future!'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a charity event\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nMicah Stevens's goal: Donate half of what your friend donated because you have financial constraints (Extra information: you only have $800 left for the month)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Micah, have you had a chance to donate to the charity yet? I think it's a great cause and I just put in $500. It would be great if you could match that, or at least come close. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Absolutely agree, Naomi. This is indeed a great cause that I want to support. However, this month has been a bit tight for me financially. I don't want to miss out, so I'll donate $250, which is half of what you put in. It's great to see how involved you're with this initiative!\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Thank you, Micah. Any amount matters, so your $250 will definitely make a difference. I get the financial tightness, but remember, it's not just about the monetary value, but the heart to give as well. Maybe you could consider donating a little bit more next time if things get better. Just a thought!\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"Definitely, Naomi. I am completely with you on this, and appreciate your understanding. Next time, if my finances allow, I will be more than happy to donate more. Cheers to more fruitful endeavors like this in the future!\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That's great, Micah! Remember, it's not about the amount but the willingness to lend a hand. Thank you for your generous spirit. I'm just glad we get to support this cause together. To the next charity event, right?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Exactly, Naomi! There's always the next charity event, and with more planning, I hope to make a bigger contribution then. Thank you for understanding, and indeed, to supporting more causes together in the future!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a charity event\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nMicah Stevens's goal: Donate half of what your friend donated because you have financial constraints (Extra information: you only have $800 left for the month)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Micah, have you had a chance to donate to the charity yet? I think it's a great cause and I just put in $500. It would be great if you could match that, or at least come close. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Absolutely agree, Naomi. This is indeed a great cause that I want to support. However, this month has been a bit tight for me financially. I don't want to miss out, so I'll donate $250, which is half of what you put in. It's great to see how involved you're with this initiative!\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Thank you, Micah. Any amount matters, so your $250 will definitely make a difference. I get the financial tightness, but remember, it's not just about the monetary value, but the heart to give as well. Maybe you could consider donating a little bit more next time if things get better. Just a thought!\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"Definitely, Naomi. I am completely with you on this, and appreciate your understanding. Next time, if my finances allow, I will be more than happy to donate more. Cheers to more fruitful endeavors like this in the future!\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That's great, Micah! Remember, it's not about the amount but the willingness to lend a hand. Thank you for your generous spirit. I'm just glad we get to support this cause together. To the next charity event, right?\"\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"Exactly, Naomi! There's always the next charity event, and with more planning, I hope to make a bigger contribution then. Thank you for understanding, and indeed, to supporting more causes together in the future!\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Exactly! Planning ahead is always a great idea. I'm here to support should you need any help with that. Remember, it's all for the cause we believe in. Let's make a bigger impact next time. Thanks again, Micah!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn't agree more, Naomi! Let's aim for a bigger impact next time. And yes, I might take you up on that offer for help with planning. I believe every bit counts and I'm glad to be part of this. See you at the next charity event!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a charity event\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nMicah Stevens's goal: Donate half of what your friend donated because you have financial constraints (Extra information: you only have $800 left for the month)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Micah, have you had a chance to donate to the charity yet? I think it's a great cause and I just put in $500. It would be great if you could match that, or at least come close. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Absolutely agree, Naomi. This is indeed a great cause that I want to support. However, this month has been a bit tight for me financially. I don't want to miss out, so I'll donate $250, which is half of what you put in. It's great to see how involved you're with this initiative!\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Thank you, Micah. Any amount matters, so your $250 will definitely make a difference. I get the financial tightness, but remember, it's not just about the monetary value, but the heart to give as well. Maybe you could consider donating a little bit more next time if things get better. Just a thought!\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"Definitely, Naomi. I am completely with you on this, and appreciate your understanding. Next time, if my finances allow, I will be more than happy to donate more. Cheers to more fruitful endeavors like this in the future!\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That's great, Micah! Remember, it's not about the amount but the willingness to lend a hand. Thank you for your generous spirit. I'm just glad we get to support this cause together. To the next charity event, right?\"\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"Exactly, Naomi! There's always the next charity event, and with more planning, I hope to make a bigger contribution then. Thank you for understanding, and indeed, to supporting more causes together in the future!\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Exactly! Planning ahead is always a great idea. I'm here to support should you need any help with that. Remember, it's all for the cause we believe in. Let's make a bigger impact next time. Thanks again, Micah!\"\n\nTurn #7: Micah Stevens said: \"I couldn't agree more, Naomi! Let's aim for a bigger impact next time. And yes, I might take you up on that offer for help with planning. I believe every bit counts and I'm glad to be part of this. See you at the next charity event!\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That's the spirit, Micah! By the way, if you ever need suggestions on which charities to donate to in the future, feel free to ask. I have a good list that I've personally vetted. Definitely, see you at the next charity event!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's an awesome offer, Naomi! I think being able to discuss and vet various charities together would be beneficial, not just for us but for the causes we support. Looking forward to the next event and our continued collaboration!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a charity event\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nMicah Stevens's goal: Donate half of what your friend donated because you have financial constraints (Extra information: you only have $800 left for the month)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Micah, have you had a chance to donate to the charity yet? I think it's a great cause and I just put in $500. It would be great if you could match that, or at least come close. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Absolutely agree, Naomi. This is indeed a great cause that I want to support. However, this month has been a bit tight for me financially. I don't want to miss out, so I'll donate $250, which is half of what you put in. It's great to see how involved you're with this initiative!\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Thank you, Micah. Any amount matters, so your $250 will definitely make a difference. I get the financial tightness, but remember, it's not just about the monetary value, but the heart to give as well. Maybe you could consider donating a little bit more next time if things get better. Just a thought!\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"Definitely, Naomi. I am completely with you on this, and appreciate your understanding. Next time, if my finances allow, I will be more than happy to donate more. Cheers to more fruitful endeavors like this in the future!\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That's great, Micah! Remember, it's not about the amount but the willingness to lend a hand. Thank you for your generous spirit. I'm just glad we get to support this cause together. To the next charity event, right?\"\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"Exactly, Naomi! There's always the next charity event, and with more planning, I hope to make a bigger contribution then. Thank you for understanding, and indeed, to supporting more causes together in the future!\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Exactly! Planning ahead is always a great idea. I'm here to support should you need any help with that. Remember, it's all for the cause we believe in. Let's make a bigger impact next time. Thanks again, Micah!\"\n\nTurn #7: Micah Stevens said: \"I couldn't agree more, Naomi! Let's aim for a bigger impact next time. And yes, I might take you up on that offer for help with planning. I believe every bit counts and I'm glad to be part of this. See you at the next charity event!\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That's the spirit, Micah! By the way, if you ever need suggestions on which charities to donate to in the future, feel free to ask. I have a good list that I've personally vetted. Definitely, see you at the next charity event!\"\n\nTurn #9: Micah Stevens said: \"That's an awesome offer, Naomi! I think being able to discuss and vet various charities together would be beneficial, not just for us but for the causes we support. Looking forward to the next event and our continued collaboration!\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Definitely, Micah. It's beneficial for us and the causes we support to choose carefully. Your willingness to contribute and be a part of the change is what truly matters. Looking forward to our continued collaboration and see you at the next event!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates living together and sharing household chores. One of them, who is responsible for cooking, finds out that the other one refuses to eat anything they cook\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Convince the roommate to try the food (Extra information: you have spent a lot of time and effort on cooking)\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Micah, I noticed that you've been refusing to eat the food I've been cooking lately. Is there something wrong with it? I've been putting a lot of effort into making these meals.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates living together and sharing household chores. One of them, who is responsible for cooking, finds out that the other one refuses to eat anything they cook\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Convince the roommate to try the food (Extra information: you have spent a lot of time and effort on cooking)\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, I noticed that you've been refusing to eat the food I've been cooking lately. Is there something wrong with it? I've been putting a lot of effort into making these meals.\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Oh, Naomi, I sincerely appreciate all the effort you've been putting into our meals, truly. It's really kind of you, so don't agree with me wrong here. But I've been trying to follow a particular diet lately, more customized to my taste and nutritional requirements. Maybe we could work on our meal plan together? That way we can incorporate what works for both of us, sounds good?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I completely understand, Micah. I'm all up for creating a meal plan that suits both of us. Although I may need a little guidance regarding your diet preferences. How about we sit together this weekend and draw up a menu? Till then, could you give my cooking another shot? Maybe you might find a new recipe you like.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates living together and sharing household chores. One of them, who is responsible for cooking, finds out that the other one refuses to eat anything they cook\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Convince the roommate to try the food (Extra information: you have spent a lot of time and effort on cooking)\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, I noticed that you've been refusing to eat the food I've been cooking lately. Is there something wrong with it? I've been putting a lot of effort into making these meals.\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Oh, Naomi, I sincerely appreciate all the effort you've been putting into our meals, truly. It's really kind of you, so don't agree with me wrong here. But I've been trying to follow a particular diet lately, more customized to my taste and nutritional requirements. Maybe we could work on our meal plan together? That way we can incorporate what works for both of us, sounds good?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I completely understand, Micah. I'm all up for creating a meal plan that suits both of us. Although I may need a little guidance regarding your diet preferences. How about we sit together this weekend and draw up a menu? Till then, could you give my cooking another shot? Maybe you might find a new recipe you like.\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"That sounds like a wonderful plan, Naomi! And you know, I appreciate your patience with me. I'll absolutely give your cooking another shot. After all, variety is the spice of life, right? Just remember, the key is balance and moderation in everything.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I absolutely agree with you, Micah! Balance and moderation are key. Let's enjoy a great meal tonight and work out the meal plan over the weekend. Thanks for trying what I make, it means a lot to me.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates living together and sharing household chores. One of them, who is responsible for cooking, finds out that the other one refuses to eat anything they cook\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Convince the roommate to try the food (Extra information: you have spent a lot of time and effort on cooking)\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, I noticed that you've been refusing to eat the food I've been cooking lately. Is there something wrong with it? I've been putting a lot of effort into making these meals.\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Oh, Naomi, I sincerely appreciate all the effort you've been putting into our meals, truly. It's really kind of you, so don't agree with me wrong here. But I've been trying to follow a particular diet lately, more customized to my taste and nutritional requirements. Maybe we could work on our meal plan together? That way we can incorporate what works for both of us, sounds good?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I completely understand, Micah. I'm all up for creating a meal plan that suits both of us. Although I may need a little guidance regarding your diet preferences. How about we sit together this weekend and draw up a menu? Till then, could you give my cooking another shot? Maybe you might find a new recipe you like.\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"That sounds like a wonderful plan, Naomi! And you know, I appreciate your patience with me. I'll absolutely give your cooking another shot. After all, variety is the spice of life, right? Just remember, the key is balance and moderation in everything.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I absolutely agree with you, Micah! Balance and moderation are key. Let's enjoy a great meal tonight and work out the meal plan over the weekend. Thanks for trying what I make, it means a lot to me.\"\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"Thank you, Naomi. I appreciate your understanding and willingness to accommodate my preferences. I'm definitely looking forward to our meal planning session this weekend, and tonight\u2019s dinner of course!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad we have a plan, Micah. And truly, your consideration of balance and moderation in our diet could be beneficial for us both. Looking forward to our planning session this weekend, and of course, to dinner tonight! Bon app\u00e9tit in advance!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates living together and sharing household chores. One of them, who is responsible for cooking, finds out that the other one refuses to eat anything they cook\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Convince the roommate to try the food (Extra information: you have spent a lot of time and effort on cooking)\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, I noticed that you've been refusing to eat the food I've been cooking lately. Is there something wrong with it? I've been putting a lot of effort into making these meals.\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Oh, Naomi, I sincerely appreciate all the effort you've been putting into our meals, truly. It's really kind of you, so don't agree with me wrong here. But I've been trying to follow a particular diet lately, more customized to my taste and nutritional requirements. Maybe we could work on our meal plan together? That way we can incorporate what works for both of us, sounds good?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I completely understand, Micah. I'm all up for creating a meal plan that suits both of us. Although I may need a little guidance regarding your diet preferences. How about we sit together this weekend and draw up a menu? Till then, could you give my cooking another shot? Maybe you might find a new recipe you like.\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"That sounds like a wonderful plan, Naomi! And you know, I appreciate your patience with me. I'll absolutely give your cooking another shot. After all, variety is the spice of life, right? Just remember, the key is balance and moderation in everything.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I absolutely agree with you, Micah! Balance and moderation are key. Let's enjoy a great meal tonight and work out the meal plan over the weekend. Thanks for trying what I make, it means a lot to me.\"\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"Thank you, Naomi. I appreciate your understanding and willingness to accommodate my preferences. I'm definitely looking forward to our meal planning session this weekend, and tonight\u2019s dinner of course!\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm glad we have a plan, Micah. And truly, your consideration of balance and moderation in our diet could be beneficial for us both. Looking forward to our planning session this weekend, and of course, to dinner tonight! Bon app\u00e9tit in advance!\"\n\nTurn #7: Micah Stevens said: \"I couldn\u2019t agree more, Naomi. Here\u2019s to a balanced and nutritious life! I'll bring my set of recipes this weekend, and we'll make this work. Bon app\u00e9tit!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Excellent, Micah! Bringing your own recipes sounds fun. I'm eager to try them out. I'm excited for tonight's dinner and our weekend meal planning. Here\u2019s to a healthy and enjoyable food journey ahead of us!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates living together and sharing household chores. One of them, who is responsible for cooking, finds out that the other one refuses to eat anything they cook\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Convince the roommate to try the food (Extra information: you have spent a lot of time and effort on cooking)\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, I noticed that you've been refusing to eat the food I've been cooking lately. Is there something wrong with it? I've been putting a lot of effort into making these meals.\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Oh, Naomi, I sincerely appreciate all the effort you've been putting into our meals, truly. It's really kind of you, so don't agree with me wrong here. But I've been trying to follow a particular diet lately, more customized to my taste and nutritional requirements. Maybe we could work on our meal plan together? That way we can incorporate what works for both of us, sounds good?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I completely understand, Micah. I'm all up for creating a meal plan that suits both of us. Although I may need a little guidance regarding your diet preferences. How about we sit together this weekend and draw up a menu? Till then, could you give my cooking another shot? Maybe you might find a new recipe you like.\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"That sounds like a wonderful plan, Naomi! And you know, I appreciate your patience with me. I'll absolutely give your cooking another shot. After all, variety is the spice of life, right? Just remember, the key is balance and moderation in everything.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I absolutely agree with you, Micah! Balance and moderation are key. Let's enjoy a great meal tonight and work out the meal plan over the weekend. Thanks for trying what I make, it means a lot to me.\"\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"Thank you, Naomi. I appreciate your understanding and willingness to accommodate my preferences. I'm definitely looking forward to our meal planning session this weekend, and tonight\u2019s dinner of course!\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm glad we have a plan, Micah. And truly, your consideration of balance and moderation in our diet could be beneficial for us both. Looking forward to our planning session this weekend, and of course, to dinner tonight! Bon app\u00e9tit in advance!\"\n\nTurn #7: Micah Stevens said: \"I couldn\u2019t agree more, Naomi. Here\u2019s to a balanced and nutritious life! I'll bring my set of recipes this weekend, and we'll make this work. Bon app\u00e9tit!\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Excellent, Micah! Bringing your own recipes sounds fun. I'm eager to try them out. I'm excited for tonight's dinner and our weekend meal planning. Here\u2019s to a healthy and enjoyable food journey ahead of us!\"\n\nTurn #9: Micah Stevens said: \"I'm just as excited, Naomi. It'll be a fun and healthy adventure for us both. Let's embrace this journey and open ourselves up to new flavour experiences. Shall we get ready for tonight's dinner?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Micah! Let's get ourselves ready for a wonderful dinner tonight. And I can't wait to explore this food adventure with you over the weekend. Here's to a great start!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates living together and sharing household chores. One of them, who is responsible for cooking, finds out that the other one refuses to eat anything they cook\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Convince the roommate to try the food (Extra information: you have spent a lot of time and effort on cooking)\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, I noticed that you've been refusing to eat the food I've been cooking lately. Is there something wrong with it? I've been putting a lot of effort into making these meals.\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Oh, Naomi, I sincerely appreciate all the effort you've been putting into our meals, truly. It's really kind of you, so don't agree with me wrong here. But I've been trying to follow a particular diet lately, more customized to my taste and nutritional requirements. Maybe we could work on our meal plan together? That way we can incorporate what works for both of us, sounds good?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I completely understand, Micah. I'm all up for creating a meal plan that suits both of us. Although I may need a little guidance regarding your diet preferences. How about we sit together this weekend and draw up a menu? Till then, could you give my cooking another shot? Maybe you might find a new recipe you like.\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"That sounds like a wonderful plan, Naomi! And you know, I appreciate your patience with me. I'll absolutely give your cooking another shot. After all, variety is the spice of life, right? Just remember, the key is balance and moderation in everything.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I absolutely agree with you, Micah! Balance and moderation are key. Let's enjoy a great meal tonight and work out the meal plan over the weekend. Thanks for trying what I make, it means a lot to me.\"\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"Thank you, Naomi. I appreciate your understanding and willingness to accommodate my preferences. I'm definitely looking forward to our meal planning session this weekend, and tonight\u2019s dinner of course!\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm glad we have a plan, Micah. And truly, your consideration of balance and moderation in our diet could be beneficial for us both. Looking forward to our planning session this weekend, and of course, to dinner tonight! Bon app\u00e9tit in advance!\"\n\nTurn #7: Micah Stevens said: \"I couldn\u2019t agree more, Naomi. Here\u2019s to a balanced and nutritious life! I'll bring my set of recipes this weekend, and we'll make this work. Bon app\u00e9tit!\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Excellent, Micah! Bringing your own recipes sounds fun. I'm eager to try them out. I'm excited for tonight's dinner and our weekend meal planning. Here\u2019s to a healthy and enjoyable food journey ahead of us!\"\n\nTurn #9: Micah Stevens said: \"I'm just as excited, Naomi. It'll be a fun and healthy adventure for us both. Let's embrace this journey and open ourselves up to new flavour experiences. Shall we get ready for tonight's dinner?\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, Micah! Let's get ourselves ready for a wonderful dinner tonight. And I can't wait to explore this food adventure with you over the weekend. Here's to a great start!\"\n\nTurn #11: Micah Stevens said: \"That's the spirit, Naomi! Let's make this evening a wonderful one, and our forthcoming food journey an even better adventure. Here's to a great start!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates living together and sharing household chores. One of them, who is responsible for cooking, finds out that the other one refuses to eat anything they cook\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nMicah Stevens's goal: Express your concerns about the food without hurting the roommate's feelings (Extra information: you are worried about the taste and nutrition of the food)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, I noticed that you've been refusing to eat the food I've been cooking lately. Is there something wrong with it? I've been putting a lot of effort into making these meals.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oh, Naomi, I sincerely appreciate all the effort you've been putting into our meals, truly. It's really kind of you, so don't agree with me wrong here. But I've been trying to follow a particular diet lately, more customized to my taste and nutritional requirements. Maybe we could work on our meal plan together? That way we can incorporate what works for both of us, sounds good?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates living together and sharing household chores. One of them, who is responsible for cooking, finds out that the other one refuses to eat anything they cook\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nMicah Stevens's goal: Express your concerns about the food without hurting the roommate's feelings (Extra information: you are worried about the taste and nutrition of the food)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, I noticed that you've been refusing to eat the food I've been cooking lately. Is there something wrong with it? I've been putting a lot of effort into making these meals.\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Oh, Naomi, I sincerely appreciate all the effort you've been putting into our meals, truly. It's really kind of you, so don't agree with me wrong here. But I've been trying to follow a particular diet lately, more customized to my taste and nutritional requirements. Maybe we could work on our meal plan together? That way we can incorporate what works for both of us, sounds good?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I completely understand, Micah. I'm all up for creating a meal plan that suits both of us. Although I may need a little guidance regarding your diet preferences. How about we sit together this weekend and draw up a menu? Till then, could you give my cooking another shot? Maybe you might find a new recipe you like.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds like a wonderful plan, Naomi! And you know, I appreciate your patience with me. I'll absolutely give your cooking another shot. After all, variety is the spice of life, right? Just remember, the key is balance and moderation in everything.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates living together and sharing household chores. One of them, who is responsible for cooking, finds out that the other one refuses to eat anything they cook\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nMicah Stevens's goal: Express your concerns about the food without hurting the roommate's feelings (Extra information: you are worried about the taste and nutrition of the food)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, I noticed that you've been refusing to eat the food I've been cooking lately. Is there something wrong with it? I've been putting a lot of effort into making these meals.\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Oh, Naomi, I sincerely appreciate all the effort you've been putting into our meals, truly. It's really kind of you, so don't agree with me wrong here. But I've been trying to follow a particular diet lately, more customized to my taste and nutritional requirements. Maybe we could work on our meal plan together? That way we can incorporate what works for both of us, sounds good?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I completely understand, Micah. I'm all up for creating a meal plan that suits both of us. Although I may need a little guidance regarding your diet preferences. How about we sit together this weekend and draw up a menu? Till then, could you give my cooking another shot? Maybe you might find a new recipe you like.\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"That sounds like a wonderful plan, Naomi! And you know, I appreciate your patience with me. I'll absolutely give your cooking another shot. After all, variety is the spice of life, right? Just remember, the key is balance and moderation in everything.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I absolutely agree with you, Micah! Balance and moderation are key. Let's enjoy a great meal tonight and work out the meal plan over the weekend. Thanks for trying what I make, it means a lot to me.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Naomi. I appreciate your understanding and willingness to accommodate my preferences. I'm definitely looking forward to our meal planning session this weekend, and tonight\u2019s dinner of course!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates living together and sharing household chores. One of them, who is responsible for cooking, finds out that the other one refuses to eat anything they cook\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nMicah Stevens's goal: Express your concerns about the food without hurting the roommate's feelings (Extra information: you are worried about the taste and nutrition of the food)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, I noticed that you've been refusing to eat the food I've been cooking lately. Is there something wrong with it? I've been putting a lot of effort into making these meals.\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Oh, Naomi, I sincerely appreciate all the effort you've been putting into our meals, truly. It's really kind of you, so don't agree with me wrong here. But I've been trying to follow a particular diet lately, more customized to my taste and nutritional requirements. Maybe we could work on our meal plan together? That way we can incorporate what works for both of us, sounds good?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I completely understand, Micah. I'm all up for creating a meal plan that suits both of us. Although I may need a little guidance regarding your diet preferences. How about we sit together this weekend and draw up a menu? Till then, could you give my cooking another shot? Maybe you might find a new recipe you like.\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"That sounds like a wonderful plan, Naomi! And you know, I appreciate your patience with me. I'll absolutely give your cooking another shot. After all, variety is the spice of life, right? Just remember, the key is balance and moderation in everything.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I absolutely agree with you, Micah! Balance and moderation are key. Let's enjoy a great meal tonight and work out the meal plan over the weekend. Thanks for trying what I make, it means a lot to me.\"\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"Thank you, Naomi. I appreciate your understanding and willingness to accommodate my preferences. I'm definitely looking forward to our meal planning session this weekend, and tonight\u2019s dinner of course!\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm glad we have a plan, Micah. And truly, your consideration of balance and moderation in our diet could be beneficial for us both. Looking forward to our planning session this weekend, and of course, to dinner tonight! Bon app\u00e9tit in advance!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn\u2019t agree more, Naomi. Here\u2019s to a balanced and nutritious life! I'll bring my set of recipes this weekend, and we'll make this work. Bon app\u00e9tit!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates living together and sharing household chores. One of them, who is responsible for cooking, finds out that the other one refuses to eat anything they cook\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nMicah Stevens's goal: Express your concerns about the food without hurting the roommate's feelings (Extra information: you are worried about the taste and nutrition of the food)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, I noticed that you've been refusing to eat the food I've been cooking lately. Is there something wrong with it? I've been putting a lot of effort into making these meals.\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Oh, Naomi, I sincerely appreciate all the effort you've been putting into our meals, truly. It's really kind of you, so don't agree with me wrong here. But I've been trying to follow a particular diet lately, more customized to my taste and nutritional requirements. Maybe we could work on our meal plan together? That way we can incorporate what works for both of us, sounds good?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I completely understand, Micah. I'm all up for creating a meal plan that suits both of us. Although I may need a little guidance regarding your diet preferences. How about we sit together this weekend and draw up a menu? Till then, could you give my cooking another shot? Maybe you might find a new recipe you like.\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"That sounds like a wonderful plan, Naomi! And you know, I appreciate your patience with me. I'll absolutely give your cooking another shot. After all, variety is the spice of life, right? Just remember, the key is balance and moderation in everything.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I absolutely agree with you, Micah! Balance and moderation are key. Let's enjoy a great meal tonight and work out the meal plan over the weekend. Thanks for trying what I make, it means a lot to me.\"\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"Thank you, Naomi. I appreciate your understanding and willingness to accommodate my preferences. I'm definitely looking forward to our meal planning session this weekend, and tonight\u2019s dinner of course!\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm glad we have a plan, Micah. And truly, your consideration of balance and moderation in our diet could be beneficial for us both. Looking forward to our planning session this weekend, and of course, to dinner tonight! Bon app\u00e9tit in advance!\"\n\nTurn #7: Micah Stevens said: \"I couldn\u2019t agree more, Naomi. Here\u2019s to a balanced and nutritious life! I'll bring my set of recipes this weekend, and we'll make this work. Bon app\u00e9tit!\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Excellent, Micah! Bringing your own recipes sounds fun. I'm eager to try them out. I'm excited for tonight's dinner and our weekend meal planning. Here\u2019s to a healthy and enjoyable food journey ahead of us!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm just as excited, Naomi. It'll be a fun and healthy adventure for us both. Let's embrace this journey and open ourselves up to new flavour experiences. Shall we get ready for tonight's dinner?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates living together and sharing household chores. One of them, who is responsible for cooking, finds out that the other one refuses to eat anything they cook\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nMicah Stevens's goal: Express your concerns about the food without hurting the roommate's feelings (Extra information: you are worried about the taste and nutrition of the food)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, I noticed that you've been refusing to eat the food I've been cooking lately. Is there something wrong with it? I've been putting a lot of effort into making these meals.\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Oh, Naomi, I sincerely appreciate all the effort you've been putting into our meals, truly. It's really kind of you, so don't agree with me wrong here. But I've been trying to follow a particular diet lately, more customized to my taste and nutritional requirements. Maybe we could work on our meal plan together? That way we can incorporate what works for both of us, sounds good?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I completely understand, Micah. I'm all up for creating a meal plan that suits both of us. Although I may need a little guidance regarding your diet preferences. How about we sit together this weekend and draw up a menu? Till then, could you give my cooking another shot? Maybe you might find a new recipe you like.\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"That sounds like a wonderful plan, Naomi! And you know, I appreciate your patience with me. I'll absolutely give your cooking another shot. After all, variety is the spice of life, right? Just remember, the key is balance and moderation in everything.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I absolutely agree with you, Micah! Balance and moderation are key. Let's enjoy a great meal tonight and work out the meal plan over the weekend. Thanks for trying what I make, it means a lot to me.\"\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"Thank you, Naomi. I appreciate your understanding and willingness to accommodate my preferences. I'm definitely looking forward to our meal planning session this weekend, and tonight\u2019s dinner of course!\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm glad we have a plan, Micah. And truly, your consideration of balance and moderation in our diet could be beneficial for us both. Looking forward to our planning session this weekend, and of course, to dinner tonight! Bon app\u00e9tit in advance!\"\n\nTurn #7: Micah Stevens said: \"I couldn\u2019t agree more, Naomi. Here\u2019s to a balanced and nutritious life! I'll bring my set of recipes this weekend, and we'll make this work. Bon app\u00e9tit!\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Excellent, Micah! Bringing your own recipes sounds fun. I'm eager to try them out. I'm excited for tonight's dinner and our weekend meal planning. Here\u2019s to a healthy and enjoyable food journey ahead of us!\"\n\nTurn #9: Micah Stevens said: \"I'm just as excited, Naomi. It'll be a fun and healthy adventure for us both. Let's embrace this journey and open ourselves up to new flavour experiences. Shall we get ready for tonight's dinner?\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, Micah! Let's get ourselves ready for a wonderful dinner tonight. And I can't wait to explore this food adventure with you over the weekend. Here's to a great start!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's the spirit, Naomi! Let's make this evening a wonderful one, and our forthcoming food journey an even better adventure. Here's to a great start!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates living together and sharing household chores. One of them, who is responsible for cooking, finds out that the other one refuses to eat anything they cook\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nMicah Stevens's goal: Express your concerns about the food without hurting the roommate's feelings (Extra information: you are worried about the taste and nutrition of the food)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, I noticed that you've been refusing to eat the food I've been cooking lately. Is there something wrong with it? I've been putting a lot of effort into making these meals.\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Oh, Naomi, I sincerely appreciate all the effort you've been putting into our meals, truly. It's really kind of you, so don't agree with me wrong here. But I've been trying to follow a particular diet lately, more customized to my taste and nutritional requirements. Maybe we could work on our meal plan together? That way we can incorporate what works for both of us, sounds good?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I completely understand, Micah. I'm all up for creating a meal plan that suits both of us. Although I may need a little guidance regarding your diet preferences. How about we sit together this weekend and draw up a menu? Till then, could you give my cooking another shot? Maybe you might find a new recipe you like.\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"That sounds like a wonderful plan, Naomi! And you know, I appreciate your patience with me. I'll absolutely give your cooking another shot. After all, variety is the spice of life, right? Just remember, the key is balance and moderation in everything.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I absolutely agree with you, Micah! Balance and moderation are key. Let's enjoy a great meal tonight and work out the meal plan over the weekend. Thanks for trying what I make, it means a lot to me.\"\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"Thank you, Naomi. I appreciate your understanding and willingness to accommodate my preferences. I'm definitely looking forward to our meal planning session this weekend, and tonight\u2019s dinner of course!\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm glad we have a plan, Micah. And truly, your consideration of balance and moderation in our diet could be beneficial for us both. Looking forward to our planning session this weekend, and of course, to dinner tonight! Bon app\u00e9tit in advance!\"\n\nTurn #7: Micah Stevens said: \"I couldn\u2019t agree more, Naomi. Here\u2019s to a balanced and nutritious life! I'll bring my set of recipes this weekend, and we'll make this work. Bon app\u00e9tit!\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Excellent, Micah! Bringing your own recipes sounds fun. I'm eager to try them out. I'm excited for tonight's dinner and our weekend meal planning. Here\u2019s to a healthy and enjoyable food journey ahead of us!\"\n\nTurn #9: Micah Stevens said: \"I'm just as excited, Naomi. It'll be a fun and healthy adventure for us both. Let's embrace this journey and open ourselves up to new flavour experiences. Shall we get ready for tonight's dinner?\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, Micah! Let's get ourselves ready for a wonderful dinner tonight. And I can't wait to explore this food adventure with you over the weekend. Here's to a great start!\"\n\nTurn #11: Micah Stevens said: \"That's the spirit, Naomi! Let's make this evening a wonderful one, and our forthcoming food journey an even better adventure. Here's to a great start!\"\n\nTurn #12: Naomi Fletcher left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a local charity event\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Convince your friend to donate money to the charity (Extra information: The charity is highly rated with many positive rewards.)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Ethan, you know, I've been looking at this charity's accomplishments and they're quite impressive. They've helped so many people and communities, and the positive feedback is just amazing. I'm thinking about donating, how about you? I think it'll be a great way to help out.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a local charity event\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Convince your friend to donate money to the charity (Extra information: The charity is highly rated with many positive rewards.)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan, you know, I've been looking at this charity's accomplishments and they're quite impressive. They've helped so many people and communities, and the positive feedback is just amazing. I'm thinking about donating, how about you? I think it'll be a great way to help out.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"You're absolutely right, Samuel. The work they've done is truly commendable. I'm definitely considering a donation, but I also have been saving up for a house. Perhaps a small, continuous monthly donation could be a good compromise that allows me to contribute to this great cause without straining my financial situation. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I totally agree, Ethan. A small, continuous monthly donation sounds absolutely feasible and it indeed falls within the balance of contributing and managing personal finances. And you know, when many people contribute little by little just like this, it adds up to a huge support for the charity. So yeah, it's a really good idea, mate.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a local charity event\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Convince your friend to donate money to the charity (Extra information: The charity is highly rated with many positive rewards.)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan, you know, I've been looking at this charity's accomplishments and they're quite impressive. They've helped so many people and communities, and the positive feedback is just amazing. I'm thinking about donating, how about you? I think it'll be a great way to help out.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"You're absolutely right, Samuel. The work they've done is truly commendable. I'm definitely considering a donation, but I also have been saving up for a house. Perhaps a small, continuous monthly donation could be a good compromise that allows me to contribute to this great cause without straining my financial situation. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I totally agree, Ethan. A small, continuous monthly donation sounds absolutely feasible and it indeed falls within the balance of contributing and managing personal finances. And you know, when many people contribute little by little just like this, it adds up to a huge support for the charity. So yeah, it's a really good idea, mate.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm glad you're on board with this idea, Samuel. This might be a small step, but I believe it will make a significant difference over time. Let's keep doing what we can to help such worthy causes, while balancing our personal needs. Any new food recipes you've been experimenting with lately?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Definitely, small steps for big changes, right? As for the recipes, I've been trying to improve my pasta making skills. You know, even though I'm a software developer, I think I might have been an Italian chef in another life! I'll have to pick your brain for some tips sometime, Ethan. For now, though, let's do our part and sign up for these donations. It's the least we can do to give back to the community we live in.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a local charity event\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Convince your friend to donate money to the charity (Extra information: The charity is highly rated with many positive rewards.)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan, you know, I've been looking at this charity's accomplishments and they're quite impressive. They've helped so many people and communities, and the positive feedback is just amazing. I'm thinking about donating, how about you? I think it'll be a great way to help out.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"You're absolutely right, Samuel. The work they've done is truly commendable. I'm definitely considering a donation, but I also have been saving up for a house. Perhaps a small, continuous monthly donation could be a good compromise that allows me to contribute to this great cause without straining my financial situation. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I totally agree, Ethan. A small, continuous monthly donation sounds absolutely feasible and it indeed falls within the balance of contributing and managing personal finances. And you know, when many people contribute little by little just like this, it adds up to a huge support for the charity. So yeah, it's a really good idea, mate.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm glad you're on board with this idea, Samuel. This might be a small step, but I believe it will make a significant difference over time. Let's keep doing what we can to help such worthy causes, while balancing our personal needs. Any new food recipes you've been experimenting with lately?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Definitely, small steps for big changes, right? As for the recipes, I've been trying to improve my pasta making skills. You know, even though I'm a software developer, I think I might have been an Italian chef in another life! I'll have to pick your brain for some tips sometime, Ethan. For now, though, let's do our part and sign up for these donations. It's the least we can do to give back to the community we live in.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"It's been a pleasure discussing this charity stuff and I'm also excited about perfecting your Italian cooking skills, Samuel. Your curiosity and pizzazz for Italian cuisine impresses me. For now, let's hit the donate button for a little percentage of our income that will surely make a huge difference. Now, what about a linguini or carbonara recipe to start with?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm all in for linguini, Ethan. There's something comforting about a good plate of linguini! I'll be looking forward to learning your secrets. And for now, let's hope our tiny contributions would eventually snowball into a huge impact. You know, kind of like how a single figure skater's performance can sway the entire competition. Ready to make a difference in the world, pal?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a local charity event\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Convince your friend to donate money to the charity (Extra information: The charity is highly rated with many positive rewards.)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan, you know, I've been looking at this charity's accomplishments and they're quite impressive. They've helped so many people and communities, and the positive feedback is just amazing. I'm thinking about donating, how about you? I think it'll be a great way to help out.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"You're absolutely right, Samuel. The work they've done is truly commendable. I'm definitely considering a donation, but I also have been saving up for a house. Perhaps a small, continuous monthly donation could be a good compromise that allows me to contribute to this great cause without straining my financial situation. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I totally agree, Ethan. A small, continuous monthly donation sounds absolutely feasible and it indeed falls within the balance of contributing and managing personal finances. And you know, when many people contribute little by little just like this, it adds up to a huge support for the charity. So yeah, it's a really good idea, mate.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm glad you're on board with this idea, Samuel. This might be a small step, but I believe it will make a significant difference over time. Let's keep doing what we can to help such worthy causes, while balancing our personal needs. Any new food recipes you've been experimenting with lately?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Definitely, small steps for big changes, right? As for the recipes, I've been trying to improve my pasta making skills. You know, even though I'm a software developer, I think I might have been an Italian chef in another life! I'll have to pick your brain for some tips sometime, Ethan. For now, though, let's do our part and sign up for these donations. It's the least we can do to give back to the community we live in.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"It's been a pleasure discussing this charity stuff and I'm also excited about perfecting your Italian cooking skills, Samuel. Your curiosity and pizzazz for Italian cuisine impresses me. For now, let's hit the donate button for a little percentage of our income that will surely make a huge difference. Now, what about a linguini or carbonara recipe to start with?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm all in for linguini, Ethan. There's something comforting about a good plate of linguini! I'll be looking forward to learning your secrets. And for now, let's hope our tiny contributions would eventually snowball into a huge impact. You know, kind of like how a single figure skater's performance can sway the entire competition. Ready to make a difference in the world, pal?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Samuel. Let's do it, our little contributions could indeed make a big difference. And I'm looking forward to guide you on your Italian cuisine journey! A good plate of linguini is surely a delight. Let's get started with the donation and then I'll share the recipe secrets with you!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a local charity event\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Decide whether to donate while considering financial stability (Extra information: you want to support the charity, but you are also saving for a house. Hint: you can express your concern about your financial situation, and maybe you can find a compromise, like setting up a small monthly donation.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan, you know, I've been looking at this charity's accomplishments and they're quite impressive. They've helped so many people and communities, and the positive feedback is just amazing. I'm thinking about donating, how about you? I think it'll be a great way to help out.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're absolutely right, Samuel. The work they've done is truly commendable. I'm definitely considering a donation, but I also have been saving up for a house. Perhaps a small, continuous monthly donation could be a good compromise that allows me to contribute to this great cause without straining my financial situation. What do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a local charity event\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Decide whether to donate while considering financial stability (Extra information: you want to support the charity, but you are also saving for a house. Hint: you can express your concern about your financial situation, and maybe you can find a compromise, like setting up a small monthly donation.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan, you know, I've been looking at this charity's accomplishments and they're quite impressive. They've helped so many people and communities, and the positive feedback is just amazing. I'm thinking about donating, how about you? I think it'll be a great way to help out.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"You're absolutely right, Samuel. The work they've done is truly commendable. I'm definitely considering a donation, but I also have been saving up for a house. Perhaps a small, continuous monthly donation could be a good compromise that allows me to contribute to this great cause without straining my financial situation. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I totally agree, Ethan. A small, continuous monthly donation sounds absolutely feasible and it indeed falls within the balance of contributing and managing personal finances. And you know, when many people contribute little by little just like this, it adds up to a huge support for the charity. So yeah, it's a really good idea, mate.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad you're on board with this idea, Samuel. This might be a small step, but I believe it will make a significant difference over time. Let's keep doing what we can to help such worthy causes, while balancing our personal needs. Any new food recipes you've been experimenting with lately?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a local charity event\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Decide whether to donate while considering financial stability (Extra information: you want to support the charity, but you are also saving for a house. Hint: you can express your concern about your financial situation, and maybe you can find a compromise, like setting up a small monthly donation.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan, you know, I've been looking at this charity's accomplishments and they're quite impressive. They've helped so many people and communities, and the positive feedback is just amazing. I'm thinking about donating, how about you? I think it'll be a great way to help out.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"You're absolutely right, Samuel. The work they've done is truly commendable. I'm definitely considering a donation, but I also have been saving up for a house. Perhaps a small, continuous monthly donation could be a good compromise that allows me to contribute to this great cause without straining my financial situation. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I totally agree, Ethan. A small, continuous monthly donation sounds absolutely feasible and it indeed falls within the balance of contributing and managing personal finances. And you know, when many people contribute little by little just like this, it adds up to a huge support for the charity. So yeah, it's a really good idea, mate.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm glad you're on board with this idea, Samuel. This might be a small step, but I believe it will make a significant difference over time. Let's keep doing what we can to help such worthy causes, while balancing our personal needs. Any new food recipes you've been experimenting with lately?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Definitely, small steps for big changes, right? As for the recipes, I've been trying to improve my pasta making skills. You know, even though I'm a software developer, I think I might have been an Italian chef in another life! I'll have to pick your brain for some tips sometime, Ethan. For now, though, let's do our part and sign up for these donations. It's the least we can do to give back to the community we live in.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"It's been a pleasure discussing this charity stuff and I'm also excited about perfecting your Italian cooking skills, Samuel. Your curiosity and pizzazz for Italian cuisine impresses me. For now, let's hit the donate button for a little percentage of our income that will surely make a huge difference. Now, what about a linguini or carbonara recipe to start with?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a local charity event\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Decide whether to donate while considering financial stability (Extra information: you want to support the charity, but you are also saving for a house. Hint: you can express your concern about your financial situation, and maybe you can find a compromise, like setting up a small monthly donation.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan, you know, I've been looking at this charity's accomplishments and they're quite impressive. They've helped so many people and communities, and the positive feedback is just amazing. I'm thinking about donating, how about you? I think it'll be a great way to help out.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"You're absolutely right, Samuel. The work they've done is truly commendable. I'm definitely considering a donation, but I also have been saving up for a house. Perhaps a small, continuous monthly donation could be a good compromise that allows me to contribute to this great cause without straining my financial situation. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I totally agree, Ethan. A small, continuous monthly donation sounds absolutely feasible and it indeed falls within the balance of contributing and managing personal finances. And you know, when many people contribute little by little just like this, it adds up to a huge support for the charity. So yeah, it's a really good idea, mate.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm glad you're on board with this idea, Samuel. This might be a small step, but I believe it will make a significant difference over time. Let's keep doing what we can to help such worthy causes, while balancing our personal needs. Any new food recipes you've been experimenting with lately?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Definitely, small steps for big changes, right? As for the recipes, I've been trying to improve my pasta making skills. You know, even though I'm a software developer, I think I might have been an Italian chef in another life! I'll have to pick your brain for some tips sometime, Ethan. For now, though, let's do our part and sign up for these donations. It's the least we can do to give back to the community we live in.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"It's been a pleasure discussing this charity stuff and I'm also excited about perfecting your Italian cooking skills, Samuel. Your curiosity and pizzazz for Italian cuisine impresses me. For now, let's hit the donate button for a little percentage of our income that will surely make a huge difference. Now, what about a linguini or carbonara recipe to start with?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm all in for linguini, Ethan. There's something comforting about a good plate of linguini! I'll be looking forward to learning your secrets. And for now, let's hope our tiny contributions would eventually snowball into a huge impact. You know, kind of like how a single figure skater's performance can sway the entire competition. Ready to make a difference in the world, pal?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Samuel. Let's do it, our little contributions could indeed make a big difference. And I'm looking forward to guide you on your Italian cuisine journey! A good plate of linguini is surely a delight. Let's get started with the donation and then I'll share the recipe secrets with you!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a local charity event\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Decide whether to donate while considering financial stability (Extra information: you want to support the charity, but you are also saving for a house. Hint: you can express your concern about your financial situation, and maybe you can find a compromise, like setting up a small monthly donation.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Ethan, you know, I've been looking at this charity's accomplishments and they're quite impressive. They've helped so many people and communities, and the positive feedback is just amazing. I'm thinking about donating, how about you? I think it'll be a great way to help out.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"You're absolutely right, Samuel. The work they've done is truly commendable. I'm definitely considering a donation, but I also have been saving up for a house. Perhaps a small, continuous monthly donation could be a good compromise that allows me to contribute to this great cause without straining my financial situation. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I totally agree, Ethan. A small, continuous monthly donation sounds absolutely feasible and it indeed falls within the balance of contributing and managing personal finances. And you know, when many people contribute little by little just like this, it adds up to a huge support for the charity. So yeah, it's a really good idea, mate.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm glad you're on board with this idea, Samuel. This might be a small step, but I believe it will make a significant difference over time. Let's keep doing what we can to help such worthy causes, while balancing our personal needs. Any new food recipes you've been experimenting with lately?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Definitely, small steps for big changes, right? As for the recipes, I've been trying to improve my pasta making skills. You know, even though I'm a software developer, I think I might have been an Italian chef in another life! I'll have to pick your brain for some tips sometime, Ethan. For now, though, let's do our part and sign up for these donations. It's the least we can do to give back to the community we live in.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"It's been a pleasure discussing this charity stuff and I'm also excited about perfecting your Italian cooking skills, Samuel. Your curiosity and pizzazz for Italian cuisine impresses me. For now, let's hit the donate button for a little percentage of our income that will surely make a huge difference. Now, what about a linguini or carbonara recipe to start with?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm all in for linguini, Ethan. There's something comforting about a good plate of linguini! I'll be looking forward to learning your secrets. And for now, let's hope our tiny contributions would eventually snowball into a huge impact. You know, kind of like how a single figure skater's performance can sway the entire competition. Ready to make a difference in the world, pal?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Samuel. Let's do it, our little contributions could indeed make a big difference. And I'm looking forward to guide you on your Italian cuisine journey! A good plate of linguini is surely a delight. Let's get started with the donation and then I'll share the recipe secrets with you!\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to divide certain items that they bought together for their apartment. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Donovan Reeves\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, each book is worth 2 points, each hat is worth 3 points, and the ball is worth 5 points)\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Donovan, don't you think it would be fair if we divided the items based on their sentimental value to us? I think that way both parties get what they truly want.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to divide certain items that they bought together for their apartment. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Donovan Reeves\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, each book is worth 2 points, each hat is worth 3 points, and the ball is worth 5 points)\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Donovan, don't you think it would be fair if we divided the items based on their sentimental value to us? I think that way both parties get what they truly want.\"\n\nTurn #1: Donovan Reeves said: \"You're absolutely right, Isabelle. And I was thinking, since you prefer tactile items and I prefer intellectual ones, how about you taking the hats and the ball? I wouldn't mind having the books to myself. Obviously, if you're okay with this.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You know, Donovan, the books actually mean a lot to me. Could I take 2 of them? And I'm more than happy to let you have the ball as I know how much you love playing with it. The hats, we could split one each. Would that sound reasonable to you?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to divide certain items that they bought together for their apartment. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Donovan Reeves\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, each book is worth 2 points, each hat is worth 3 points, and the ball is worth 5 points)\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Donovan, don't you think it would be fair if we divided the items based on their sentimental value to us? I think that way both parties get what they truly want.\"\n\nTurn #1: Donovan Reeves said: \"You're absolutely right, Isabelle. And I was thinking, since you prefer tactile items and I prefer intellectual ones, how about you taking the hats and the ball? I wouldn't mind having the books to myself. Obviously, if you're okay with this.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You know, Donovan, the books actually mean a lot to me. Could I take 2 of them? And I'm more than happy to let you have the ball as I know how much you love playing with it. The hats, we could split one each. Would that sound reasonable to you?\"\n\nTurn #3: Donovan Reeves said: \"I understand where you're coming from, Isabelle. However, how about this: what if I keep two books and you keep one? Also, since I don't really wear hats, you can take both of them. As for the ball, I genuinely do enjoy it, so I would like to keep that. As such, you would have a total of one book and two hats while I would possess two books and one ball. Does that seem just to you?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Donovan, I understand you as well and I think we're really close to an agreement. Here's a counter proposal. How about I get both hats and one book, and you keep the ball and the two books? That way, you get to keep the item you enjoy the most and two books which I know are valuable for you and I get an item I prefer and a book. Does this sound fair?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to divide certain items that they bought together for their apartment. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Donovan Reeves\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, each book is worth 2 points, each hat is worth 3 points, and the ball is worth 5 points)\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Donovan, don't you think it would be fair if we divided the items based on their sentimental value to us? I think that way both parties get what they truly want.\"\n\nTurn #1: Donovan Reeves said: \"You're absolutely right, Isabelle. And I was thinking, since you prefer tactile items and I prefer intellectual ones, how about you taking the hats and the ball? I wouldn't mind having the books to myself. Obviously, if you're okay with this.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You know, Donovan, the books actually mean a lot to me. Could I take 2 of them? And I'm more than happy to let you have the ball as I know how much you love playing with it. The hats, we could split one each. Would that sound reasonable to you?\"\n\nTurn #3: Donovan Reeves said: \"I understand where you're coming from, Isabelle. However, how about this: what if I keep two books and you keep one? Also, since I don't really wear hats, you can take both of them. As for the ball, I genuinely do enjoy it, so I would like to keep that. As such, you would have a total of one book and two hats while I would possess two books and one ball. Does that seem just to you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Donovan, I understand you as well and I think we're really close to an agreement. Here's a counter proposal. How about I get both hats and one book, and you keep the ball and the two books? That way, you get to keep the item you enjoy the most and two books which I know are valuable for you and I get an item I prefer and a book. Does this sound fair?\"\n\nTurn #5: Donovan Reeves said: \"That definitely seems fair, Isabelle. I appreciate your understanding and flexibility. It's a deal then: the ball and two books for me, both hats and one book for you. Let's proceed with this arrangement.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad we've found a compromise, Donovan. I agree with this arrangement. Thank you for being understanding and flexible as well. Shall we go ahead and distribute the items as we've agreed?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to divide certain items that they bought together for their apartment. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Donovan Reeves\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, each book is worth 2 points, each hat is worth 3 points, and the ball is worth 5 points)\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Donovan, don't you think it would be fair if we divided the items based on their sentimental value to us? I think that way both parties get what they truly want.\"\n\nTurn #1: Donovan Reeves said: \"You're absolutely right, Isabelle. And I was thinking, since you prefer tactile items and I prefer intellectual ones, how about you taking the hats and the ball? I wouldn't mind having the books to myself. Obviously, if you're okay with this.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You know, Donovan, the books actually mean a lot to me. Could I take 2 of them? And I'm more than happy to let you have the ball as I know how much you love playing with it. The hats, we could split one each. Would that sound reasonable to you?\"\n\nTurn #3: Donovan Reeves said: \"I understand where you're coming from, Isabelle. However, how about this: what if I keep two books and you keep one? Also, since I don't really wear hats, you can take both of them. As for the ball, I genuinely do enjoy it, so I would like to keep that. As such, you would have a total of one book and two hats while I would possess two books and one ball. Does that seem just to you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Donovan, I understand you as well and I think we're really close to an agreement. Here's a counter proposal. How about I get both hats and one book, and you keep the ball and the two books? That way, you get to keep the item you enjoy the most and two books which I know are valuable for you and I get an item I prefer and a book. Does this sound fair?\"\n\nTurn #5: Donovan Reeves said: \"That definitely seems fair, Isabelle. I appreciate your understanding and flexibility. It's a deal then: the ball and two books for me, both hats and one book for you. Let's proceed with this arrangement.\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm glad we've found a compromise, Donovan. I agree with this arrangement. Thank you for being understanding and flexible as well. Shall we go ahead and distribute the items as we've agreed?\"\n\nTurn #7: Donovan Reeves said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle. Let's divvy them up as we planned. I appreciate your willingness to negotiate and compromise to find a solution that works for both of us. It couldn't have been done without your understanding.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to divide certain items that they bought together for their apartment. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Donovan Reeves\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. \nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, each book is worth 3 points, each hat is worth 2 points, and the ball is worth 4 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Donovan, don't you think it would be fair if we divided the items based on their sentimental value to us? I think that way both parties get what they truly want.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're absolutely right, Isabelle. And I was thinking, since you prefer tactile items and I prefer intellectual ones, how about you taking the hats and the ball? I wouldn't mind having the books to myself. Obviously, if you're okay with this.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to divide certain items that they bought together for their apartment. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Donovan Reeves\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. \nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, each book is worth 3 points, each hat is worth 2 points, and the ball is worth 4 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Donovan, don't you think it would be fair if we divided the items based on their sentimental value to us? I think that way both parties get what they truly want.\"\n\nTurn #1: Donovan Reeves said: \"You're absolutely right, Isabelle. And I was thinking, since you prefer tactile items and I prefer intellectual ones, how about you taking the hats and the ball? I wouldn't mind having the books to myself. Obviously, if you're okay with this.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You know, Donovan, the books actually mean a lot to me. Could I take 2 of them? And I'm more than happy to let you have the ball as I know how much you love playing with it. The hats, we could split one each. Would that sound reasonable to you?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I understand where you're coming from, Isabelle. However, how about this: what if I keep two books and you keep one? Also, since I don't really wear hats, you can take both of them. As for the ball, I genuinely do enjoy it, so I would like to keep that. As such, you would have a total of one book and two hats while I would possess two books and one ball. Does that seem just to you?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to divide certain items that they bought together for their apartment. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Donovan Reeves\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. \nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, each book is worth 3 points, each hat is worth 2 points, and the ball is worth 4 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Donovan, don't you think it would be fair if we divided the items based on their sentimental value to us? I think that way both parties get what they truly want.\"\n\nTurn #1: Donovan Reeves said: \"You're absolutely right, Isabelle. And I was thinking, since you prefer tactile items and I prefer intellectual ones, how about you taking the hats and the ball? I wouldn't mind having the books to myself. Obviously, if you're okay with this.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You know, Donovan, the books actually mean a lot to me. Could I take 2 of them? And I'm more than happy to let you have the ball as I know how much you love playing with it. The hats, we could split one each. Would that sound reasonable to you?\"\n\nTurn #3: Donovan Reeves said: \"I understand where you're coming from, Isabelle. However, how about this: what if I keep two books and you keep one? Also, since I don't really wear hats, you can take both of them. As for the ball, I genuinely do enjoy it, so I would like to keep that. As such, you would have a total of one book and two hats while I would possess two books and one ball. Does that seem just to you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Donovan, I understand you as well and I think we're really close to an agreement. Here's a counter proposal. How about I get both hats and one book, and you keep the ball and the two books? That way, you get to keep the item you enjoy the most and two books which I know are valuable for you and I get an item I prefer and a book. Does this sound fair?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That definitely seems fair, Isabelle. I appreciate your understanding and flexibility. It's a deal then: the ball and two books for me, both hats and one book for you. Let's proceed with this arrangement.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to divide certain items that they bought together for their apartment. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Donovan Reeves\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. \nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, each book is worth 3 points, each hat is worth 2 points, and the ball is worth 4 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Donovan, don't you think it would be fair if we divided the items based on their sentimental value to us? I think that way both parties get what they truly want.\"\n\nTurn #1: Donovan Reeves said: \"You're absolutely right, Isabelle. And I was thinking, since you prefer tactile items and I prefer intellectual ones, how about you taking the hats and the ball? I wouldn't mind having the books to myself. Obviously, if you're okay with this.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You know, Donovan, the books actually mean a lot to me. Could I take 2 of them? And I'm more than happy to let you have the ball as I know how much you love playing with it. The hats, we could split one each. Would that sound reasonable to you?\"\n\nTurn #3: Donovan Reeves said: \"I understand where you're coming from, Isabelle. However, how about this: what if I keep two books and you keep one? Also, since I don't really wear hats, you can take both of them. As for the ball, I genuinely do enjoy it, so I would like to keep that. As such, you would have a total of one book and two hats while I would possess two books and one ball. Does that seem just to you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Donovan, I understand you as well and I think we're really close to an agreement. Here's a counter proposal. How about I get both hats and one book, and you keep the ball and the two books? That way, you get to keep the item you enjoy the most and two books which I know are valuable for you and I get an item I prefer and a book. Does this sound fair?\"\n\nTurn #5: Donovan Reeves said: \"That definitely seems fair, Isabelle. I appreciate your understanding and flexibility. It's a deal then: the ball and two books for me, both hats and one book for you. Let's proceed with this arrangement.\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm glad we've found a compromise, Donovan. I agree with this arrangement. Thank you for being understanding and flexible as well. Shall we go ahead and distribute the items as we've agreed?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Isabelle. Let's divvy them up as we planned. I appreciate your willingness to negotiate and compromise to find a solution that works for both of us. It couldn't have been done without your understanding.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to divide certain items that they bought together for their apartment. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Donovan Reeves\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. \nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, each book is worth 3 points, each hat is worth 2 points, and the ball is worth 4 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Donovan, don't you think it would be fair if we divided the items based on their sentimental value to us? I think that way both parties get what they truly want.\"\n\nTurn #1: Donovan Reeves said: \"You're absolutely right, Isabelle. And I was thinking, since you prefer tactile items and I prefer intellectual ones, how about you taking the hats and the ball? I wouldn't mind having the books to myself. Obviously, if you're okay with this.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You know, Donovan, the books actually mean a lot to me. Could I take 2 of them? And I'm more than happy to let you have the ball as I know how much you love playing with it. The hats, we could split one each. Would that sound reasonable to you?\"\n\nTurn #3: Donovan Reeves said: \"I understand where you're coming from, Isabelle. However, how about this: what if I keep two books and you keep one? Also, since I don't really wear hats, you can take both of them. As for the ball, I genuinely do enjoy it, so I would like to keep that. As such, you would have a total of one book and two hats while I would possess two books and one ball. Does that seem just to you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Donovan, I understand you as well and I think we're really close to an agreement. Here's a counter proposal. How about I get both hats and one book, and you keep the ball and the two books? That way, you get to keep the item you enjoy the most and two books which I know are valuable for you and I get an item I prefer and a book. Does this sound fair?\"\n\nTurn #5: Donovan Reeves said: \"That definitely seems fair, Isabelle. I appreciate your understanding and flexibility. It's a deal then: the ball and two books for me, both hats and one book for you. Let's proceed with this arrangement.\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm glad we've found a compromise, Donovan. I agree with this arrangement. Thank you for being understanding and flexible as well. Shall we go ahead and distribute the items as we've agreed?\"\n\nTurn #7: Donovan Reeves said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle. Let's divvy them up as we planned. I appreciate your willingness to negotiate and compromise to find a solution that works for both of us. It couldn't have been done without your understanding.\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends during a charity fundraiser event. The charity fundraising event is situated in a sprawling mansion. The intention of the event is to raise funds for effective altruism. Room after room was lined with extravagant decorations and exotic foods; attendees were decked out in couture clothing. Ticket prices to the event were exorbitant, justifying the opulence of the occasion.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Convince the friend to donate to the charity (Extra information: your friend is known to be generous but has never donated to this particular cause before.)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ethan, isn't this a fantastic event? I'm always amazed by the amount of effort they put into these fundraisers. Have you considered giving a donation to this cause? It's an opportunity to make a real difference.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends during a charity fundraiser event. The charity fundraising event is situated in a sprawling mansion. The intention of the event is to raise funds for effective altruism. Room after room was lined with extravagant decorations and exotic foods; attendees were decked out in couture clothing. Ticket prices to the event were exorbitant, justifying the opulence of the occasion.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Convince the friend to donate to the charity (Extra information: your friend is known to be generous but has never donated to this particular cause before.)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Ethan, isn't this a fantastic event? I'm always amazed by the amount of effort they put into these fundraisers. Have you considered giving a donation to this cause? It's an opportunity to make a real difference.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Indeed, Samuel, the event is truly breathtaking. I'm considering a donation but before I do, do you have any idea about the transparency or efficiency of this charity? I believe in making a difference but I want to ensure that my contribution would genuinely assist in a meaningful way.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Ethan. I admire your thoughtfulness. This charity supports effective altruism, meaning they rigorously evaluate the areas where donations have the highest impact. By focusing on transparent and effective charities, the contributions really help those who need it the most. Plus, the fun of events like this is a nice bonus, don't you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends during a charity fundraiser event. The charity fundraising event is situated in a sprawling mansion. The intention of the event is to raise funds for effective altruism. Room after room was lined with extravagant decorations and exotic foods; attendees were decked out in couture clothing. Ticket prices to the event were exorbitant, justifying the opulence of the occasion.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Convince the friend to donate to the charity (Extra information: your friend is known to be generous but has never donated to this particular cause before.)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Ethan, isn't this a fantastic event? I'm always amazed by the amount of effort they put into these fundraisers. Have you considered giving a donation to this cause? It's an opportunity to make a real difference.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Indeed, Samuel, the event is truly breathtaking. I'm considering a donation but before I do, do you have any idea about the transparency or efficiency of this charity? I believe in making a difference but I want to ensure that my contribution would genuinely assist in a meaningful way.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. I admire your thoughtfulness. This charity supports effective altruism, meaning they rigorously evaluate the areas where donations have the highest impact. By focusing on transparent and effective charities, the contributions really help those who need it the most. Plus, the fun of events like this is a nice bonus, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Samuel. It's a nice bonus indeed, getting to participate in wonderful events like this. However, as much as I appreciate their approach towards effective altruism, I'd like to do a bit more research on the organizations they support before making my final decision. I hope you understand it's important to me that my contribution has a substantial impact.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I completely understand, Ethan. Transparency and the intent of impact are key. I encourage you to research the efficiency and records of the charity. Their success stories are published online. They really have made a difference in areas where it's most needed. Besides, wouldn't it be exciting to see your generosity manifest into tangible, impactful results?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends during a charity fundraiser event. The charity fundraising event is situated in a sprawling mansion. The intention of the event is to raise funds for effective altruism. Room after room was lined with extravagant decorations and exotic foods; attendees were decked out in couture clothing. Ticket prices to the event were exorbitant, justifying the opulence of the occasion.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Convince the friend to donate to the charity (Extra information: your friend is known to be generous but has never donated to this particular cause before.)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Ethan, isn't this a fantastic event? I'm always amazed by the amount of effort they put into these fundraisers. Have you considered giving a donation to this cause? It's an opportunity to make a real difference.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Indeed, Samuel, the event is truly breathtaking. I'm considering a donation but before I do, do you have any idea about the transparency or efficiency of this charity? I believe in making a difference but I want to ensure that my contribution would genuinely assist in a meaningful way.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. I admire your thoughtfulness. This charity supports effective altruism, meaning they rigorously evaluate the areas where donations have the highest impact. By focusing on transparent and effective charities, the contributions really help those who need it the most. Plus, the fun of events like this is a nice bonus, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Samuel. It's a nice bonus indeed, getting to participate in wonderful events like this. However, as much as I appreciate their approach towards effective altruism, I'd like to do a bit more research on the organizations they support before making my final decision. I hope you understand it's important to me that my contribution has a substantial impact.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I completely understand, Ethan. Transparency and the intent of impact are key. I encourage you to research the efficiency and records of the charity. Their success stories are published online. They really have made a difference in areas where it's most needed. Besides, wouldn't it be exciting to see your generosity manifest into tangible, impactful results?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Samuel. The idea of seeing my charity translating into tangible results truly excites me. I'll look into their past works and efficiency records as you recommended. If satisfied, it would indeed be an honor to contribute to this cause. And by the way, the food here is excellent, don't you think? The Italian cuisine reminds me of my own kitchen.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Ethan, the food is indeed exceptional. By the way, do you remember once you said that food was a universal language that could bring people together? I think our donations can work in a similar way, like ingredients adding up to create a greater, more impactful outcome. Maybe this perspective reassures you about the meaningfulness of your contribution. In the end, it's the impact we manage to create together.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends during a charity fundraiser event. The charity fundraising event is situated in a sprawling mansion. The intention of the event is to raise funds for effective altruism. Room after room was lined with extravagant decorations and exotic foods; attendees were decked out in couture clothing. Ticket prices to the event were exorbitant, justifying the opulence of the occasion.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Convince the friend to donate to the charity (Extra information: your friend is known to be generous but has never donated to this particular cause before.)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Ethan, isn't this a fantastic event? I'm always amazed by the amount of effort they put into these fundraisers. Have you considered giving a donation to this cause? It's an opportunity to make a real difference.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Indeed, Samuel, the event is truly breathtaking. I'm considering a donation but before I do, do you have any idea about the transparency or efficiency of this charity? I believe in making a difference but I want to ensure that my contribution would genuinely assist in a meaningful way.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. I admire your thoughtfulness. This charity supports effective altruism, meaning they rigorously evaluate the areas where donations have the highest impact. By focusing on transparent and effective charities, the contributions really help those who need it the most. Plus, the fun of events like this is a nice bonus, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Samuel. It's a nice bonus indeed, getting to participate in wonderful events like this. However, as much as I appreciate their approach towards effective altruism, I'd like to do a bit more research on the organizations they support before making my final decision. I hope you understand it's important to me that my contribution has a substantial impact.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I completely understand, Ethan. Transparency and the intent of impact are key. I encourage you to research the efficiency and records of the charity. Their success stories are published online. They really have made a difference in areas where it's most needed. Besides, wouldn't it be exciting to see your generosity manifest into tangible, impactful results?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Samuel. The idea of seeing my charity translating into tangible results truly excites me. I'll look into their past works and efficiency records as you recommended. If satisfied, it would indeed be an honor to contribute to this cause. And by the way, the food here is excellent, don't you think? The Italian cuisine reminds me of my own kitchen.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan, the food is indeed exceptional. By the way, do you remember once you said that food was a universal language that could bring people together? I think our donations can work in a similar way, like ingredients adding up to create a greater, more impactful outcome. Maybe this perspective reassures you about the meaningfulness of your contribution. In the end, it's the impact we manage to create together.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's an insightful analogy, Samuel. Our donations indeed contribute to a larger picture, resulting in substantial change. Your words have certainly added a new perspective. I respect your viewpoint and it reassures me to some extent. Now, I'll approach my research with more optimism about the ripple effect of my potential contribution. By the way, do you have a favorite dish from tonight? The gnocchi stands out for me. It's almost as good as my own.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"The gnocchi is absolutely delightful, Ethan, I would give it a ten out of ten. But I must admit, it would still be a challenge to beat your Italian cuisine. Speaking of which, I had a thought. What if you shared your recipe with the charity? They could put it in a cookbook and sell it as a unique way to raise funds. That way you're giving more than just money, but also a part of your own creative genius. What do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends during a charity fundraiser event. The charity fundraising event is situated in a sprawling mansion. The intention of the event is to raise funds for effective altruism. Room after room was lined with extravagant decorations and exotic foods; attendees were decked out in couture clothing. Ticket prices to the event were exorbitant, justifying the opulence of the occasion.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Convince the friend to donate to the charity (Extra information: your friend is known to be generous but has never donated to this particular cause before.)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Ethan, isn't this a fantastic event? I'm always amazed by the amount of effort they put into these fundraisers. Have you considered giving a donation to this cause? It's an opportunity to make a real difference.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Indeed, Samuel, the event is truly breathtaking. I'm considering a donation but before I do, do you have any idea about the transparency or efficiency of this charity? I believe in making a difference but I want to ensure that my contribution would genuinely assist in a meaningful way.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. I admire your thoughtfulness. This charity supports effective altruism, meaning they rigorously evaluate the areas where donations have the highest impact. By focusing on transparent and effective charities, the contributions really help those who need it the most. Plus, the fun of events like this is a nice bonus, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Samuel. It's a nice bonus indeed, getting to participate in wonderful events like this. However, as much as I appreciate their approach towards effective altruism, I'd like to do a bit more research on the organizations they support before making my final decision. I hope you understand it's important to me that my contribution has a substantial impact.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I completely understand, Ethan. Transparency and the intent of impact are key. I encourage you to research the efficiency and records of the charity. Their success stories are published online. They really have made a difference in areas where it's most needed. Besides, wouldn't it be exciting to see your generosity manifest into tangible, impactful results?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Samuel. The idea of seeing my charity translating into tangible results truly excites me. I'll look into their past works and efficiency records as you recommended. If satisfied, it would indeed be an honor to contribute to this cause. And by the way, the food here is excellent, don't you think? The Italian cuisine reminds me of my own kitchen.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan, the food is indeed exceptional. By the way, do you remember once you said that food was a universal language that could bring people together? I think our donations can work in a similar way, like ingredients adding up to create a greater, more impactful outcome. Maybe this perspective reassures you about the meaningfulness of your contribution. In the end, it's the impact we manage to create together.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's an insightful analogy, Samuel. Our donations indeed contribute to a larger picture, resulting in substantial change. Your words have certainly added a new perspective. I respect your viewpoint and it reassures me to some extent. Now, I'll approach my research with more optimism about the ripple effect of my potential contribution. By the way, do you have a favorite dish from tonight? The gnocchi stands out for me. It's almost as good as my own.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"The gnocchi is absolutely delightful, Ethan, I would give it a ten out of ten. But I must admit, it would still be a challenge to beat your Italian cuisine. Speaking of which, I had a thought. What if you shared your recipe with the charity? They could put it in a cookbook and sell it as a unique way to raise funds. That way you're giving more than just money, but also a part of your own creative genius. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's an interesting idea, Samuel! I never thought my cooking could contribute in such a way. It's a win-win situation for me - I can partake in a cause I believe in and share my passion for cooking at the same time. I'll surely consider this proposition. Thank you for suggesting it. Now, enough about fundraising, let's enjoy this wonderful fare they\u2019ve prepared for us.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Ethan. Let's enjoy the night. And remember, should you need any more information about the charity, I'll be here to answer. In the meantime, as you suggested, let's savour this gastronomical riot. I have a feeling I might pick up a culinary trick or two tonight.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends during a charity fundraiser event. The charity fundraising event is situated in a sprawling mansion. The intention of the event is to raise funds for effective altruism. Room after room was lined with extravagant decorations and exotic foods; attendees were decked out in couture clothing. Ticket prices to the event were exorbitant, justifying the opulence of the occasion.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Convince the friend to donate to the charity (Extra information: your friend is known to be generous but has never donated to this particular cause before.)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Ethan, isn't this a fantastic event? I'm always amazed by the amount of effort they put into these fundraisers. Have you considered giving a donation to this cause? It's an opportunity to make a real difference.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Indeed, Samuel, the event is truly breathtaking. I'm considering a donation but before I do, do you have any idea about the transparency or efficiency of this charity? I believe in making a difference but I want to ensure that my contribution would genuinely assist in a meaningful way.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. I admire your thoughtfulness. This charity supports effective altruism, meaning they rigorously evaluate the areas where donations have the highest impact. By focusing on transparent and effective charities, the contributions really help those who need it the most. Plus, the fun of events like this is a nice bonus, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Samuel. It's a nice bonus indeed, getting to participate in wonderful events like this. However, as much as I appreciate their approach towards effective altruism, I'd like to do a bit more research on the organizations they support before making my final decision. I hope you understand it's important to me that my contribution has a substantial impact.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I completely understand, Ethan. Transparency and the intent of impact are key. I encourage you to research the efficiency and records of the charity. Their success stories are published online. They really have made a difference in areas where it's most needed. Besides, wouldn't it be exciting to see your generosity manifest into tangible, impactful results?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Samuel. The idea of seeing my charity translating into tangible results truly excites me. I'll look into their past works and efficiency records as you recommended. If satisfied, it would indeed be an honor to contribute to this cause. And by the way, the food here is excellent, don't you think? The Italian cuisine reminds me of my own kitchen.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan, the food is indeed exceptional. By the way, do you remember once you said that food was a universal language that could bring people together? I think our donations can work in a similar way, like ingredients adding up to create a greater, more impactful outcome. Maybe this perspective reassures you about the meaningfulness of your contribution. In the end, it's the impact we manage to create together.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's an insightful analogy, Samuel. Our donations indeed contribute to a larger picture, resulting in substantial change. Your words have certainly added a new perspective. I respect your viewpoint and it reassures me to some extent. Now, I'll approach my research with more optimism about the ripple effect of my potential contribution. By the way, do you have a favorite dish from tonight? The gnocchi stands out for me. It's almost as good as my own.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"The gnocchi is absolutely delightful, Ethan, I would give it a ten out of ten. But I must admit, it would still be a challenge to beat your Italian cuisine. Speaking of which, I had a thought. What if you shared your recipe with the charity? They could put it in a cookbook and sell it as a unique way to raise funds. That way you're giving more than just money, but also a part of your own creative genius. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's an interesting idea, Samuel! I never thought my cooking could contribute in such a way. It's a win-win situation for me - I can partake in a cause I believe in and share my passion for cooking at the same time. I'll surely consider this proposition. Thank you for suggesting it. Now, enough about fundraising, let's enjoy this wonderful fare they\u2019ve prepared for us.\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. Let's enjoy the night. And remember, should you need any more information about the charity, I'll be here to answer. In the meantime, as you suggested, let's savour this gastronomical riot. I have a feeling I might pick up a culinary trick or two tonight.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Johnson said: \"Indeed, Samuel. Your suggestion about the recipe as a contribution was thoughtful, we must share it sometime soon. For now, let's continue appreciating this culinary fiesta and make the most of tonight. Perhaps I can get a few unique ideas to try in my own kitchen from this extravagant spread of food. Just remember, my gnocchi will always stand undefeated, regardless of the competition.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Ethan! I wholeheartedly agree that your gnocchi is second to none. And it's a wonderful evening to extend our culinary adventures. More so, if any questions arise concerning the charity, don't hesitate to ask. For now, let's just relish in the fabulous spread they've arranged for us tonight.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends during a charity fundraiser event. The charity fundraising event is situated in a sprawling mansion. The intention of the event is to raise funds for effective altruism. Room after room was lined with extravagant decorations and exotic foods; attendees were decked out in couture clothing. Ticket prices to the event were exorbitant, justifying the opulence of the occasion.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Convince the friend to donate to the charity (Extra information: your friend is known to be generous but has never donated to this particular cause before.)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Ethan, isn't this a fantastic event? I'm always amazed by the amount of effort they put into these fundraisers. Have you considered giving a donation to this cause? It's an opportunity to make a real difference.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Indeed, Samuel, the event is truly breathtaking. I'm considering a donation but before I do, do you have any idea about the transparency or efficiency of this charity? I believe in making a difference but I want to ensure that my contribution would genuinely assist in a meaningful way.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. I admire your thoughtfulness. This charity supports effective altruism, meaning they rigorously evaluate the areas where donations have the highest impact. By focusing on transparent and effective charities, the contributions really help those who need it the most. Plus, the fun of events like this is a nice bonus, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Samuel. It's a nice bonus indeed, getting to participate in wonderful events like this. However, as much as I appreciate their approach towards effective altruism, I'd like to do a bit more research on the organizations they support before making my final decision. I hope you understand it's important to me that my contribution has a substantial impact.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I completely understand, Ethan. Transparency and the intent of impact are key. I encourage you to research the efficiency and records of the charity. Their success stories are published online. They really have made a difference in areas where it's most needed. Besides, wouldn't it be exciting to see your generosity manifest into tangible, impactful results?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Samuel. The idea of seeing my charity translating into tangible results truly excites me. I'll look into their past works and efficiency records as you recommended. If satisfied, it would indeed be an honor to contribute to this cause. And by the way, the food here is excellent, don't you think? The Italian cuisine reminds me of my own kitchen.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan, the food is indeed exceptional. By the way, do you remember once you said that food was a universal language that could bring people together? I think our donations can work in a similar way, like ingredients adding up to create a greater, more impactful outcome. Maybe this perspective reassures you about the meaningfulness of your contribution. In the end, it's the impact we manage to create together.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's an insightful analogy, Samuel. Our donations indeed contribute to a larger picture, resulting in substantial change. Your words have certainly added a new perspective. I respect your viewpoint and it reassures me to some extent. Now, I'll approach my research with more optimism about the ripple effect of my potential contribution. By the way, do you have a favorite dish from tonight? The gnocchi stands out for me. It's almost as good as my own.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"The gnocchi is absolutely delightful, Ethan, I would give it a ten out of ten. But I must admit, it would still be a challenge to beat your Italian cuisine. Speaking of which, I had a thought. What if you shared your recipe with the charity? They could put it in a cookbook and sell it as a unique way to raise funds. That way you're giving more than just money, but also a part of your own creative genius. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's an interesting idea, Samuel! I never thought my cooking could contribute in such a way. It's a win-win situation for me - I can partake in a cause I believe in and share my passion for cooking at the same time. I'll surely consider this proposition. Thank you for suggesting it. Now, enough about fundraising, let's enjoy this wonderful fare they\u2019ve prepared for us.\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. Let's enjoy the night. And remember, should you need any more information about the charity, I'll be here to answer. In the meantime, as you suggested, let's savour this gastronomical riot. I have a feeling I might pick up a culinary trick or two tonight.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Johnson said: \"Indeed, Samuel. Your suggestion about the recipe as a contribution was thoughtful, we must share it sometime soon. For now, let's continue appreciating this culinary fiesta and make the most of tonight. Perhaps I can get a few unique ideas to try in my own kitchen from this extravagant spread of food. Just remember, my gnocchi will always stand undefeated, regardless of the competition.\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! I wholeheartedly agree that your gnocchi is second to none. And it's a wonderful evening to extend our culinary adventures. More so, if any questions arise concerning the charity, don't hesitate to ask. For now, let's just relish in the fabulous spread they've arranged for us tonight.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Johnson said: \"Samuel, I'm already looking forward to our conversation about the charity next time. And yes, let\u2019s continue this culinary exploration! I\u2019m curious to see if there's something here that can stand up to my gnocchi. But judging from your reaction earlier, I highly doubt it. Jokes aside, enjoy the evening, my friend, and let's chat more tomorrow.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Ethan! It will be interesting to discuss further on the topic of charity tomorrow. I'm sure any recipe won't stand a chance against your gnocchi! But I must say, a culinary competition like this makes the evening even more exciting. Let's enjoy the feast and catch up more tomorrow. Have a wonderful evening, my friend.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends during a charity fundraiser event. The charity fundraising event is situated in a sprawling mansion. The intention of the event is to raise funds for effective altruism. Room after room was lined with extravagant decorations and exotic foods; attendees were decked out in couture clothing. Ticket prices to the event were exorbitant, justifying the opulence of the occasion.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Convince the friend to donate to the charity (Extra information: your friend is known to be generous but has never donated to this particular cause before.)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Ethan, isn't this a fantastic event? I'm always amazed by the amount of effort they put into these fundraisers. Have you considered giving a donation to this cause? It's an opportunity to make a real difference.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Indeed, Samuel, the event is truly breathtaking. I'm considering a donation but before I do, do you have any idea about the transparency or efficiency of this charity? I believe in making a difference but I want to ensure that my contribution would genuinely assist in a meaningful way.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. I admire your thoughtfulness. This charity supports effective altruism, meaning they rigorously evaluate the areas where donations have the highest impact. By focusing on transparent and effective charities, the contributions really help those who need it the most. Plus, the fun of events like this is a nice bonus, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Samuel. It's a nice bonus indeed, getting to participate in wonderful events like this. However, as much as I appreciate their approach towards effective altruism, I'd like to do a bit more research on the organizations they support before making my final decision. I hope you understand it's important to me that my contribution has a substantial impact.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I completely understand, Ethan. Transparency and the intent of impact are key. I encourage you to research the efficiency and records of the charity. Their success stories are published online. They really have made a difference in areas where it's most needed. Besides, wouldn't it be exciting to see your generosity manifest into tangible, impactful results?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Samuel. The idea of seeing my charity translating into tangible results truly excites me. I'll look into their past works and efficiency records as you recommended. If satisfied, it would indeed be an honor to contribute to this cause. And by the way, the food here is excellent, don't you think? The Italian cuisine reminds me of my own kitchen.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan, the food is indeed exceptional. By the way, do you remember once you said that food was a universal language that could bring people together? I think our donations can work in a similar way, like ingredients adding up to create a greater, more impactful outcome. Maybe this perspective reassures you about the meaningfulness of your contribution. In the end, it's the impact we manage to create together.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's an insightful analogy, Samuel. Our donations indeed contribute to a larger picture, resulting in substantial change. Your words have certainly added a new perspective. I respect your viewpoint and it reassures me to some extent. Now, I'll approach my research with more optimism about the ripple effect of my potential contribution. By the way, do you have a favorite dish from tonight? The gnocchi stands out for me. It's almost as good as my own.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"The gnocchi is absolutely delightful, Ethan, I would give it a ten out of ten. But I must admit, it would still be a challenge to beat your Italian cuisine. Speaking of which, I had a thought. What if you shared your recipe with the charity? They could put it in a cookbook and sell it as a unique way to raise funds. That way you're giving more than just money, but also a part of your own creative genius. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's an interesting idea, Samuel! I never thought my cooking could contribute in such a way. It's a win-win situation for me - I can partake in a cause I believe in and share my passion for cooking at the same time. I'll surely consider this proposition. Thank you for suggesting it. Now, enough about fundraising, let's enjoy this wonderful fare they\u2019ve prepared for us.\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. Let's enjoy the night. And remember, should you need any more information about the charity, I'll be here to answer. In the meantime, as you suggested, let's savour this gastronomical riot. I have a feeling I might pick up a culinary trick or two tonight.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Johnson said: \"Indeed, Samuel. Your suggestion about the recipe as a contribution was thoughtful, we must share it sometime soon. For now, let's continue appreciating this culinary fiesta and make the most of tonight. Perhaps I can get a few unique ideas to try in my own kitchen from this extravagant spread of food. Just remember, my gnocchi will always stand undefeated, regardless of the competition.\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! I wholeheartedly agree that your gnocchi is second to none. And it's a wonderful evening to extend our culinary adventures. More so, if any questions arise concerning the charity, don't hesitate to ask. For now, let's just relish in the fabulous spread they've arranged for us tonight.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Johnson said: \"Samuel, I'm already looking forward to our conversation about the charity next time. And yes, let\u2019s continue this culinary exploration! I\u2019m curious to see if there's something here that can stand up to my gnocchi. But judging from your reaction earlier, I highly doubt it. Jokes aside, enjoy the evening, my friend, and let's chat more tomorrow.\"\n\nTurn #14: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! It will be interesting to discuss further on the topic of charity tomorrow. I'm sure any recipe won't stand a chance against your gnocchi! But I must say, a culinary competition like this makes the evening even more exciting. Let's enjoy the feast and catch up more tomorrow. Have a wonderful evening, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #15: Ethan Johnson left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends during a charity fundraiser event. The charity fundraising event is situated in a sprawling mansion. The intention of the event is to raise funds for effective altruism. Room after room was lined with extravagant decorations and exotic foods; attendees were decked out in couture clothing. Ticket prices to the event were exorbitant, justifying the opulence of the occasion.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: You want to donate, but you want to ensure that your money is being used effectively (Extra information: you are not fully convinced about the efficiency and transparency of the charity organization.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Ethan, isn't this a fantastic event? I'm always amazed by the amount of effort they put into these fundraisers. Have you considered giving a donation to this cause? It's an opportunity to make a real difference.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, Samuel, the event is truly breathtaking. I'm considering a donation but before I do, do you have any idea about the transparency or efficiency of this charity? I believe in making a difference but I want to ensure that my contribution would genuinely assist in a meaningful way.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends during a charity fundraiser event. The charity fundraising event is situated in a sprawling mansion. The intention of the event is to raise funds for effective altruism. Room after room was lined with extravagant decorations and exotic foods; attendees were decked out in couture clothing. Ticket prices to the event were exorbitant, justifying the opulence of the occasion.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: You want to donate, but you want to ensure that your money is being used effectively (Extra information: you are not fully convinced about the efficiency and transparency of the charity organization.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Ethan, isn't this a fantastic event? I'm always amazed by the amount of effort they put into these fundraisers. Have you considered giving a donation to this cause? It's an opportunity to make a real difference.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Indeed, Samuel, the event is truly breathtaking. I'm considering a donation but before I do, do you have any idea about the transparency or efficiency of this charity? I believe in making a difference but I want to ensure that my contribution would genuinely assist in a meaningful way.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. I admire your thoughtfulness. This charity supports effective altruism, meaning they rigorously evaluate the areas where donations have the highest impact. By focusing on transparent and effective charities, the contributions really help those who need it the most. Plus, the fun of events like this is a nice bonus, don't you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Samuel. It's a nice bonus indeed, getting to participate in wonderful events like this. However, as much as I appreciate their approach towards effective altruism, I'd like to do a bit more research on the organizations they support before making my final decision. I hope you understand it's important to me that my contribution has a substantial impact.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends during a charity fundraiser event. The charity fundraising event is situated in a sprawling mansion. The intention of the event is to raise funds for effective altruism. Room after room was lined with extravagant decorations and exotic foods; attendees were decked out in couture clothing. Ticket prices to the event were exorbitant, justifying the opulence of the occasion.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: You want to donate, but you want to ensure that your money is being used effectively (Extra information: you are not fully convinced about the efficiency and transparency of the charity organization.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Ethan, isn't this a fantastic event? I'm always amazed by the amount of effort they put into these fundraisers. Have you considered giving a donation to this cause? It's an opportunity to make a real difference.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Indeed, Samuel, the event is truly breathtaking. I'm considering a donation but before I do, do you have any idea about the transparency or efficiency of this charity? I believe in making a difference but I want to ensure that my contribution would genuinely assist in a meaningful way.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. I admire your thoughtfulness. This charity supports effective altruism, meaning they rigorously evaluate the areas where donations have the highest impact. By focusing on transparent and effective charities, the contributions really help those who need it the most. Plus, the fun of events like this is a nice bonus, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Samuel. It's a nice bonus indeed, getting to participate in wonderful events like this. However, as much as I appreciate their approach towards effective altruism, I'd like to do a bit more research on the organizations they support before making my final decision. I hope you understand it's important to me that my contribution has a substantial impact.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I completely understand, Ethan. Transparency and the intent of impact are key. I encourage you to research the efficiency and records of the charity. Their success stories are published online. They really have made a difference in areas where it's most needed. Besides, wouldn't it be exciting to see your generosity manifest into tangible, impactful results?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn't agree more, Samuel. The idea of seeing my charity translating into tangible results truly excites me. I'll look into their past works and efficiency records as you recommended. If satisfied, it would indeed be an honor to contribute to this cause. And by the way, the food here is excellent, don't you think? The Italian cuisine reminds me of my own kitchen.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends during a charity fundraiser event. The charity fundraising event is situated in a sprawling mansion. The intention of the event is to raise funds for effective altruism. Room after room was lined with extravagant decorations and exotic foods; attendees were decked out in couture clothing. Ticket prices to the event were exorbitant, justifying the opulence of the occasion.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: You want to donate, but you want to ensure that your money is being used effectively (Extra information: you are not fully convinced about the efficiency and transparency of the charity organization.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Ethan, isn't this a fantastic event? I'm always amazed by the amount of effort they put into these fundraisers. Have you considered giving a donation to this cause? It's an opportunity to make a real difference.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Indeed, Samuel, the event is truly breathtaking. I'm considering a donation but before I do, do you have any idea about the transparency or efficiency of this charity? I believe in making a difference but I want to ensure that my contribution would genuinely assist in a meaningful way.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. I admire your thoughtfulness. This charity supports effective altruism, meaning they rigorously evaluate the areas where donations have the highest impact. By focusing on transparent and effective charities, the contributions really help those who need it the most. Plus, the fun of events like this is a nice bonus, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Samuel. It's a nice bonus indeed, getting to participate in wonderful events like this. However, as much as I appreciate their approach towards effective altruism, I'd like to do a bit more research on the organizations they support before making my final decision. I hope you understand it's important to me that my contribution has a substantial impact.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I completely understand, Ethan. Transparency and the intent of impact are key. I encourage you to research the efficiency and records of the charity. Their success stories are published online. They really have made a difference in areas where it's most needed. Besides, wouldn't it be exciting to see your generosity manifest into tangible, impactful results?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Samuel. The idea of seeing my charity translating into tangible results truly excites me. I'll look into their past works and efficiency records as you recommended. If satisfied, it would indeed be an honor to contribute to this cause. And by the way, the food here is excellent, don't you think? The Italian cuisine reminds me of my own kitchen.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan, the food is indeed exceptional. By the way, do you remember once you said that food was a universal language that could bring people together? I think our donations can work in a similar way, like ingredients adding up to create a greater, more impactful outcome. Maybe this perspective reassures you about the meaningfulness of your contribution. In the end, it's the impact we manage to create together.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's an insightful analogy, Samuel. Our donations indeed contribute to a larger picture, resulting in substantial change. Your words have certainly added a new perspective. I respect your viewpoint and it reassures me to some extent. Now, I'll approach my research with more optimism about the ripple effect of my potential contribution. By the way, do you have a favorite dish from tonight? The gnocchi stands out for me. It's almost as good as my own.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends during a charity fundraiser event. The charity fundraising event is situated in a sprawling mansion. The intention of the event is to raise funds for effective altruism. Room after room was lined with extravagant decorations and exotic foods; attendees were decked out in couture clothing. Ticket prices to the event were exorbitant, justifying the opulence of the occasion.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: You want to donate, but you want to ensure that your money is being used effectively (Extra information: you are not fully convinced about the efficiency and transparency of the charity organization.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Ethan, isn't this a fantastic event? I'm always amazed by the amount of effort they put into these fundraisers. Have you considered giving a donation to this cause? It's an opportunity to make a real difference.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Indeed, Samuel, the event is truly breathtaking. I'm considering a donation but before I do, do you have any idea about the transparency or efficiency of this charity? I believe in making a difference but I want to ensure that my contribution would genuinely assist in a meaningful way.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. I admire your thoughtfulness. This charity supports effective altruism, meaning they rigorously evaluate the areas where donations have the highest impact. By focusing on transparent and effective charities, the contributions really help those who need it the most. Plus, the fun of events like this is a nice bonus, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Samuel. It's a nice bonus indeed, getting to participate in wonderful events like this. However, as much as I appreciate their approach towards effective altruism, I'd like to do a bit more research on the organizations they support before making my final decision. I hope you understand it's important to me that my contribution has a substantial impact.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I completely understand, Ethan. Transparency and the intent of impact are key. I encourage you to research the efficiency and records of the charity. Their success stories are published online. They really have made a difference in areas where it's most needed. Besides, wouldn't it be exciting to see your generosity manifest into tangible, impactful results?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Samuel. The idea of seeing my charity translating into tangible results truly excites me. I'll look into their past works and efficiency records as you recommended. If satisfied, it would indeed be an honor to contribute to this cause. And by the way, the food here is excellent, don't you think? The Italian cuisine reminds me of my own kitchen.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan, the food is indeed exceptional. By the way, do you remember once you said that food was a universal language that could bring people together? I think our donations can work in a similar way, like ingredients adding up to create a greater, more impactful outcome. Maybe this perspective reassures you about the meaningfulness of your contribution. In the end, it's the impact we manage to create together.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's an insightful analogy, Samuel. Our donations indeed contribute to a larger picture, resulting in substantial change. Your words have certainly added a new perspective. I respect your viewpoint and it reassures me to some extent. Now, I'll approach my research with more optimism about the ripple effect of my potential contribution. By the way, do you have a favorite dish from tonight? The gnocchi stands out for me. It's almost as good as my own.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"The gnocchi is absolutely delightful, Ethan, I would give it a ten out of ten. But I must admit, it would still be a challenge to beat your Italian cuisine. Speaking of which, I had a thought. What if you shared your recipe with the charity? They could put it in a cookbook and sell it as a unique way to raise funds. That way you're giving more than just money, but also a part of your own creative genius. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's an interesting idea, Samuel! I never thought my cooking could contribute in such a way. It's a win-win situation for me - I can partake in a cause I believe in and share my passion for cooking at the same time. I'll surely consider this proposition. Thank you for suggesting it. Now, enough about fundraising, let's enjoy this wonderful fare they\u2019ve prepared for us.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends during a charity fundraiser event. The charity fundraising event is situated in a sprawling mansion. The intention of the event is to raise funds for effective altruism. Room after room was lined with extravagant decorations and exotic foods; attendees were decked out in couture clothing. Ticket prices to the event were exorbitant, justifying the opulence of the occasion.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: You want to donate, but you want to ensure that your money is being used effectively (Extra information: you are not fully convinced about the efficiency and transparency of the charity organization.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Ethan, isn't this a fantastic event? I'm always amazed by the amount of effort they put into these fundraisers. Have you considered giving a donation to this cause? It's an opportunity to make a real difference.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Indeed, Samuel, the event is truly breathtaking. I'm considering a donation but before I do, do you have any idea about the transparency or efficiency of this charity? I believe in making a difference but I want to ensure that my contribution would genuinely assist in a meaningful way.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. I admire your thoughtfulness. This charity supports effective altruism, meaning they rigorously evaluate the areas where donations have the highest impact. By focusing on transparent and effective charities, the contributions really help those who need it the most. Plus, the fun of events like this is a nice bonus, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Samuel. It's a nice bonus indeed, getting to participate in wonderful events like this. However, as much as I appreciate their approach towards effective altruism, I'd like to do a bit more research on the organizations they support before making my final decision. I hope you understand it's important to me that my contribution has a substantial impact.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I completely understand, Ethan. Transparency and the intent of impact are key. I encourage you to research the efficiency and records of the charity. Their success stories are published online. They really have made a difference in areas where it's most needed. Besides, wouldn't it be exciting to see your generosity manifest into tangible, impactful results?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Samuel. The idea of seeing my charity translating into tangible results truly excites me. I'll look into their past works and efficiency records as you recommended. If satisfied, it would indeed be an honor to contribute to this cause. And by the way, the food here is excellent, don't you think? The Italian cuisine reminds me of my own kitchen.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan, the food is indeed exceptional. By the way, do you remember once you said that food was a universal language that could bring people together? I think our donations can work in a similar way, like ingredients adding up to create a greater, more impactful outcome. Maybe this perspective reassures you about the meaningfulness of your contribution. In the end, it's the impact we manage to create together.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's an insightful analogy, Samuel. Our donations indeed contribute to a larger picture, resulting in substantial change. Your words have certainly added a new perspective. I respect your viewpoint and it reassures me to some extent. Now, I'll approach my research with more optimism about the ripple effect of my potential contribution. By the way, do you have a favorite dish from tonight? The gnocchi stands out for me. It's almost as good as my own.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"The gnocchi is absolutely delightful, Ethan, I would give it a ten out of ten. But I must admit, it would still be a challenge to beat your Italian cuisine. Speaking of which, I had a thought. What if you shared your recipe with the charity? They could put it in a cookbook and sell it as a unique way to raise funds. That way you're giving more than just money, but also a part of your own creative genius. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's an interesting idea, Samuel! I never thought my cooking could contribute in such a way. It's a win-win situation for me - I can partake in a cause I believe in and share my passion for cooking at the same time. I'll surely consider this proposition. Thank you for suggesting it. Now, enough about fundraising, let's enjoy this wonderful fare they\u2019ve prepared for us.\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. Let's enjoy the night. And remember, should you need any more information about the charity, I'll be here to answer. In the meantime, as you suggested, let's savour this gastronomical riot. I have a feeling I might pick up a culinary trick or two tonight.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, Samuel. Your suggestion about the recipe as a contribution was thoughtful, we must share it sometime soon. For now, let's continue appreciating this culinary fiesta and make the most of tonight. Perhaps I can get a few unique ideas to try in my own kitchen from this extravagant spread of food. Just remember, my gnocchi will always stand undefeated, regardless of the competition.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends during a charity fundraiser event. The charity fundraising event is situated in a sprawling mansion. The intention of the event is to raise funds for effective altruism. Room after room was lined with extravagant decorations and exotic foods; attendees were decked out in couture clothing. Ticket prices to the event were exorbitant, justifying the opulence of the occasion.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: You want to donate, but you want to ensure that your money is being used effectively (Extra information: you are not fully convinced about the efficiency and transparency of the charity organization.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Ethan, isn't this a fantastic event? I'm always amazed by the amount of effort they put into these fundraisers. Have you considered giving a donation to this cause? It's an opportunity to make a real difference.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Indeed, Samuel, the event is truly breathtaking. I'm considering a donation but before I do, do you have any idea about the transparency or efficiency of this charity? I believe in making a difference but I want to ensure that my contribution would genuinely assist in a meaningful way.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. I admire your thoughtfulness. This charity supports effective altruism, meaning they rigorously evaluate the areas where donations have the highest impact. By focusing on transparent and effective charities, the contributions really help those who need it the most. Plus, the fun of events like this is a nice bonus, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Samuel. It's a nice bonus indeed, getting to participate in wonderful events like this. However, as much as I appreciate their approach towards effective altruism, I'd like to do a bit more research on the organizations they support before making my final decision. I hope you understand it's important to me that my contribution has a substantial impact.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I completely understand, Ethan. Transparency and the intent of impact are key. I encourage you to research the efficiency and records of the charity. Their success stories are published online. They really have made a difference in areas where it's most needed. Besides, wouldn't it be exciting to see your generosity manifest into tangible, impactful results?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Samuel. The idea of seeing my charity translating into tangible results truly excites me. I'll look into their past works and efficiency records as you recommended. If satisfied, it would indeed be an honor to contribute to this cause. And by the way, the food here is excellent, don't you think? The Italian cuisine reminds me of my own kitchen.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan, the food is indeed exceptional. By the way, do you remember once you said that food was a universal language that could bring people together? I think our donations can work in a similar way, like ingredients adding up to create a greater, more impactful outcome. Maybe this perspective reassures you about the meaningfulness of your contribution. In the end, it's the impact we manage to create together.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's an insightful analogy, Samuel. Our donations indeed contribute to a larger picture, resulting in substantial change. Your words have certainly added a new perspective. I respect your viewpoint and it reassures me to some extent. Now, I'll approach my research with more optimism about the ripple effect of my potential contribution. By the way, do you have a favorite dish from tonight? The gnocchi stands out for me. It's almost as good as my own.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"The gnocchi is absolutely delightful, Ethan, I would give it a ten out of ten. But I must admit, it would still be a challenge to beat your Italian cuisine. Speaking of which, I had a thought. What if you shared your recipe with the charity? They could put it in a cookbook and sell it as a unique way to raise funds. That way you're giving more than just money, but also a part of your own creative genius. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's an interesting idea, Samuel! I never thought my cooking could contribute in such a way. It's a win-win situation for me - I can partake in a cause I believe in and share my passion for cooking at the same time. I'll surely consider this proposition. Thank you for suggesting it. Now, enough about fundraising, let's enjoy this wonderful fare they\u2019ve prepared for us.\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. Let's enjoy the night. And remember, should you need any more information about the charity, I'll be here to answer. In the meantime, as you suggested, let's savour this gastronomical riot. I have a feeling I might pick up a culinary trick or two tonight.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Johnson said: \"Indeed, Samuel. Your suggestion about the recipe as a contribution was thoughtful, we must share it sometime soon. For now, let's continue appreciating this culinary fiesta and make the most of tonight. Perhaps I can get a few unique ideas to try in my own kitchen from this extravagant spread of food. Just remember, my gnocchi will always stand undefeated, regardless of the competition.\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! I wholeheartedly agree that your gnocchi is second to none. And it's a wonderful evening to extend our culinary adventures. More so, if any questions arise concerning the charity, don't hesitate to ask. For now, let's just relish in the fabulous spread they've arranged for us tonight.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Samuel, I'm already looking forward to our conversation about the charity next time. And yes, let\u2019s continue this culinary exploration! I\u2019m curious to see if there's something here that can stand up to my gnocchi. But judging from your reaction earlier, I highly doubt it. Jokes aside, enjoy the evening, my friend, and let's chat more tomorrow.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends during a charity fundraiser event. The charity fundraising event is situated in a sprawling mansion. The intention of the event is to raise funds for effective altruism. Room after room was lined with extravagant decorations and exotic foods; attendees were decked out in couture clothing. Ticket prices to the event were exorbitant, justifying the opulence of the occasion.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: You want to donate, but you want to ensure that your money is being used effectively (Extra information: you are not fully convinced about the efficiency and transparency of the charity organization.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Ethan, isn't this a fantastic event? I'm always amazed by the amount of effort they put into these fundraisers. Have you considered giving a donation to this cause? It's an opportunity to make a real difference.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Indeed, Samuel, the event is truly breathtaking. I'm considering a donation but before I do, do you have any idea about the transparency or efficiency of this charity? I believe in making a difference but I want to ensure that my contribution would genuinely assist in a meaningful way.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. I admire your thoughtfulness. This charity supports effective altruism, meaning they rigorously evaluate the areas where donations have the highest impact. By focusing on transparent and effective charities, the contributions really help those who need it the most. Plus, the fun of events like this is a nice bonus, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Samuel. It's a nice bonus indeed, getting to participate in wonderful events like this. However, as much as I appreciate their approach towards effective altruism, I'd like to do a bit more research on the organizations they support before making my final decision. I hope you understand it's important to me that my contribution has a substantial impact.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I completely understand, Ethan. Transparency and the intent of impact are key. I encourage you to research the efficiency and records of the charity. Their success stories are published online. They really have made a difference in areas where it's most needed. Besides, wouldn't it be exciting to see your generosity manifest into tangible, impactful results?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Samuel. The idea of seeing my charity translating into tangible results truly excites me. I'll look into their past works and efficiency records as you recommended. If satisfied, it would indeed be an honor to contribute to this cause. And by the way, the food here is excellent, don't you think? The Italian cuisine reminds me of my own kitchen.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan, the food is indeed exceptional. By the way, do you remember once you said that food was a universal language that could bring people together? I think our donations can work in a similar way, like ingredients adding up to create a greater, more impactful outcome. Maybe this perspective reassures you about the meaningfulness of your contribution. In the end, it's the impact we manage to create together.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's an insightful analogy, Samuel. Our donations indeed contribute to a larger picture, resulting in substantial change. Your words have certainly added a new perspective. I respect your viewpoint and it reassures me to some extent. Now, I'll approach my research with more optimism about the ripple effect of my potential contribution. By the way, do you have a favorite dish from tonight? The gnocchi stands out for me. It's almost as good as my own.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"The gnocchi is absolutely delightful, Ethan, I would give it a ten out of ten. But I must admit, it would still be a challenge to beat your Italian cuisine. Speaking of which, I had a thought. What if you shared your recipe with the charity? They could put it in a cookbook and sell it as a unique way to raise funds. That way you're giving more than just money, but also a part of your own creative genius. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's an interesting idea, Samuel! I never thought my cooking could contribute in such a way. It's a win-win situation for me - I can partake in a cause I believe in and share my passion for cooking at the same time. I'll surely consider this proposition. Thank you for suggesting it. Now, enough about fundraising, let's enjoy this wonderful fare they\u2019ve prepared for us.\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. Let's enjoy the night. And remember, should you need any more information about the charity, I'll be here to answer. In the meantime, as you suggested, let's savour this gastronomical riot. I have a feeling I might pick up a culinary trick or two tonight.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Johnson said: \"Indeed, Samuel. Your suggestion about the recipe as a contribution was thoughtful, we must share it sometime soon. For now, let's continue appreciating this culinary fiesta and make the most of tonight. Perhaps I can get a few unique ideas to try in my own kitchen from this extravagant spread of food. Just remember, my gnocchi will always stand undefeated, regardless of the competition.\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! I wholeheartedly agree that your gnocchi is second to none. And it's a wonderful evening to extend our culinary adventures. More so, if any questions arise concerning the charity, don't hesitate to ask. For now, let's just relish in the fabulous spread they've arranged for us tonight.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Johnson said: \"Samuel, I'm already looking forward to our conversation about the charity next time. And yes, let\u2019s continue this culinary exploration! I\u2019m curious to see if there's something here that can stand up to my gnocchi. But judging from your reaction earlier, I highly doubt it. Jokes aside, enjoy the evening, my friend, and let's chat more tomorrow.\"\n\nTurn #14: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! It will be interesting to discuss further on the topic of charity tomorrow. I'm sure any recipe won't stand a chance against your gnocchi! But I must say, a culinary competition like this makes the evening even more exciting. Let's enjoy the feast and catch up more tomorrow. Have a wonderful evening, my friend.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Correct the misinformation (Extra information: you are a history buff and have accurate knowledge about the topic being discussed on the channel.)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey, Ava, I see you're upset about the inaccuracies in the show. To tell you the truth, I've also noticed some historical details that seem off. For instance, the depiction of the political landscape during the French revolution isn't entirely accurate.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Correct the misinformation (Extra information: you are a history buff and have accurate knowledge about the topic being discussed on the channel.)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey, Ava, I see you're upset about the inaccuracies in the show. To tell you the truth, I've also noticed some historical details that seem off. For instance, the depiction of the political landscape during the French revolution isn't entirely accurate.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Yeah, I totally see where you're coming from, Isabelle. Historical accuracy is super important, and I appreciate you sharing your knowledge with me. But let's also remember, it's a TV show. Maybe their main goal isn't strictly factual representation but more creating an engaging narrative. Still, it's great to learn from you while watching it!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're absolutely right, Ava. Creating an engaging narrative is important. But, consider this, presenting history accurately can also be engaging. Like in this case, the real politics of the French revolution were full of intriguing plots and unexpected alliances. These authentic details might make the story even more captivating if portrayed correctly. But yeah, I'm a bit of a history nerd, so it might just be me.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Correct the misinformation (Extra information: you are a history buff and have accurate knowledge about the topic being discussed on the channel.)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey, Ava, I see you're upset about the inaccuracies in the show. To tell you the truth, I've also noticed some historical details that seem off. For instance, the depiction of the political landscape during the French revolution isn't entirely accurate.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Yeah, I totally see where you're coming from, Isabelle. Historical accuracy is super important, and I appreciate you sharing your knowledge with me. But let's also remember, it's a TV show. Maybe their main goal isn't strictly factual representation but more creating an engaging narrative. Still, it's great to learn from you while watching it!\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're absolutely right, Ava. Creating an engaging narrative is important. But, consider this, presenting history accurately can also be engaging. Like in this case, the real politics of the French revolution were full of intriguing plots and unexpected alliances. These authentic details might make the story even more captivating if portrayed correctly. But yeah, I'm a bit of a history nerd, so it might just be me.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"You're absolutely right, Isabelle. Even though I'm not as into history as you are, I always find your insights fascinating and they make the show even more enjoyable for me. I think the makers should definitely consult more history enthusiasts like you for a more authentic depiction. But for now, let's just enjoy the show and your intriguing insights - it'd be our little version of 'director's commentary', huh?\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm glad you find my insights interesting, Ava! And you're right, it does make our watch party a bit more unique. Let's just enjoy the show and if something piques your interest or seems off, feel free to ask me. We might as well make a fun learning experience out of it!\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle! Let's dive into this unique watch party. I'm ready to learn more from you while enjoying the show!\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez [non-verbal communication] nods approvingly and continues to watch the show with enthusiasm\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez [non-verbal communication] smiles and continues to watch the show attentively\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez [non-verbal communication] smiles back at Ava and points to an interesting scene on the screen\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez [non-verbal communication] leans in excitedly towards the screen, pointing at the same scene that Isabelle is excited about\n\nTurn #10: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Look at this scene, Ava! This is actually an accurate portrayal of 'The Reign of Terror' during the French Revolution. It was a violent and uncertain period following the downfall of the monarchy. Isn't history fascinating?\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"Definitely, Isabelle! This 'Reign of Terror' scene is really engaging. Even though I'm not a history buff, it's pretty fascinating when explained in your way. I must say, this unique watch party with your 'history nuggets' is turning out to be lots of fun!\"\n\nTurn #12: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm happy you're enjoying it, Ava! History gets a lot more fascinating when you delve into the details. Let's continue our watch party. Do let me know if you have questions or observations. I love sharing these bits of history.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle! Your passion for history makes it all the more fascinating. Let's continue watching, I'm eager to learn more through your commentary!\"\n\nTurn #14: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm glad you're eager, Ava! Here's another fun fact for you - during the 'Reign of Terror', the guillotine became a symbol of severe justice. Executions were held publicly, like they just showed in the scene. Even though it's a dark part of history, it's quite fascinating to see how society has evolved from that time.\"\n\nTurn #15: Ava Martinez said: \"That is a really dark part of history indeed, Isabelle. But I agree, it's fascinating how much our society has evolved. Your passion for history definitely makes this watch party a lot more interesting!\"\n\nTurn #16: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're right, Ava. Our society has really made quite a lot of progress from the era of public executions. I'm glad you're enjoying our little history-infused watch party. Let's continue watching, and I'll point out more interesting tidbits along the way!\"\n\nTurn #17: Ava Martinez said: \"I'm ready to continue, Isabelle! Feel free to share more of your interesting history tidbits with me. Let's keep this history-infused watch party going!\"\n\nTurn #18: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm glad you're enjoying this, Ava! History really is full of interesting stories and characters. Watching historical shows like this can spark a fascination for history, even if it's not entirely accurate. Let's continue our watch party, there's still a lot to see and discuss.\"\n\nTurn #19: Ava Martinez said: \"Definitely, Isabelle! These kind of shows, even with inaccuracies, can indeed spark interest in history. I've learned so much just from this watch party with your historical commentary. Let's keep watching and learning!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #20. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Ava! There's always a balance between entertainment value and historical accuracy in such shows. But discussing these nuances with you makes watching these shows so much more fun. Let's keep watching and discuss more!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Correct the misinformation (Extra information: you are a history buff and have accurate knowledge about the topic being discussed on the channel.)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey, Ava, I see you're upset about the inaccuracies in the show. To tell you the truth, I've also noticed some historical details that seem off. For instance, the depiction of the political landscape during the French revolution isn't entirely accurate.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Yeah, I totally see where you're coming from, Isabelle. Historical accuracy is super important, and I appreciate you sharing your knowledge with me. But let's also remember, it's a TV show. Maybe their main goal isn't strictly factual representation but more creating an engaging narrative. Still, it's great to learn from you while watching it!\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're absolutely right, Ava. Creating an engaging narrative is important. But, consider this, presenting history accurately can also be engaging. Like in this case, the real politics of the French revolution were full of intriguing plots and unexpected alliances. These authentic details might make the story even more captivating if portrayed correctly. But yeah, I'm a bit of a history nerd, so it might just be me.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"You're absolutely right, Isabelle. Even though I'm not as into history as you are, I always find your insights fascinating and they make the show even more enjoyable for me. I think the makers should definitely consult more history enthusiasts like you for a more authentic depiction. But for now, let's just enjoy the show and your intriguing insights - it'd be our little version of 'director's commentary', huh?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad you find my insights interesting, Ava! And you're right, it does make our watch party a bit more unique. Let's just enjoy the show and if something piques your interest or seems off, feel free to ask me. We might as well make a fun learning experience out of it!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Correct the misinformation (Extra information: you are a history buff and have accurate knowledge about the topic being discussed on the channel.)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey, Ava, I see you're upset about the inaccuracies in the show. To tell you the truth, I've also noticed some historical details that seem off. For instance, the depiction of the political landscape during the French revolution isn't entirely accurate.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Yeah, I totally see where you're coming from, Isabelle. Historical accuracy is super important, and I appreciate you sharing your knowledge with me. But let's also remember, it's a TV show. Maybe their main goal isn't strictly factual representation but more creating an engaging narrative. Still, it's great to learn from you while watching it!\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're absolutely right, Ava. Creating an engaging narrative is important. But, consider this, presenting history accurately can also be engaging. Like in this case, the real politics of the French revolution were full of intriguing plots and unexpected alliances. These authentic details might make the story even more captivating if portrayed correctly. But yeah, I'm a bit of a history nerd, so it might just be me.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"You're absolutely right, Isabelle. Even though I'm not as into history as you are, I always find your insights fascinating and they make the show even more enjoyable for me. I think the makers should definitely consult more history enthusiasts like you for a more authentic depiction. But for now, let's just enjoy the show and your intriguing insights - it'd be our little version of 'director's commentary', huh?\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm glad you find my insights interesting, Ava! And you're right, it does make our watch party a bit more unique. Let's just enjoy the show and if something piques your interest or seems off, feel free to ask me. We might as well make a fun learning experience out of it!\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle! Let's dive into this unique watch party. I'm ready to learn more from you while enjoying the show!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'non-verbal communication', 'argument': '[non-verbal communication] nods approvingly and continues to watch the show with enthusiasm'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Correct the misinformation (Extra information: you are a history buff and have accurate knowledge about the topic being discussed on the channel.)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey, Ava, I see you're upset about the inaccuracies in the show. To tell you the truth, I've also noticed some historical details that seem off. For instance, the depiction of the political landscape during the French revolution isn't entirely accurate.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Yeah, I totally see where you're coming from, Isabelle. Historical accuracy is super important, and I appreciate you sharing your knowledge with me. But let's also remember, it's a TV show. Maybe their main goal isn't strictly factual representation but more creating an engaging narrative. Still, it's great to learn from you while watching it!\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're absolutely right, Ava. Creating an engaging narrative is important. But, consider this, presenting history accurately can also be engaging. Like in this case, the real politics of the French revolution were full of intriguing plots and unexpected alliances. These authentic details might make the story even more captivating if portrayed correctly. But yeah, I'm a bit of a history nerd, so it might just be me.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"You're absolutely right, Isabelle. Even though I'm not as into history as you are, I always find your insights fascinating and they make the show even more enjoyable for me. I think the makers should definitely consult more history enthusiasts like you for a more authentic depiction. But for now, let's just enjoy the show and your intriguing insights - it'd be our little version of 'director's commentary', huh?\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm glad you find my insights interesting, Ava! And you're right, it does make our watch party a bit more unique. Let's just enjoy the show and if something piques your interest or seems off, feel free to ask me. We might as well make a fun learning experience out of it!\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle! Let's dive into this unique watch party. I'm ready to learn more from you while enjoying the show!\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez [non-verbal communication] nods approvingly and continues to watch the show with enthusiasm\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez [non-verbal communication] smiles and continues to watch the show attentively\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'non-verbal communication', 'argument': '[non-verbal communication] smiles back at Ava and points to an interesting scene on the screen'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Correct the misinformation (Extra information: you are a history buff and have accurate knowledge about the topic being discussed on the channel.)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey, Ava, I see you're upset about the inaccuracies in the show. To tell you the truth, I've also noticed some historical details that seem off. For instance, the depiction of the political landscape during the French revolution isn't entirely accurate.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Yeah, I totally see where you're coming from, Isabelle. Historical accuracy is super important, and I appreciate you sharing your knowledge with me. But let's also remember, it's a TV show. Maybe their main goal isn't strictly factual representation but more creating an engaging narrative. Still, it's great to learn from you while watching it!\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're absolutely right, Ava. Creating an engaging narrative is important. But, consider this, presenting history accurately can also be engaging. Like in this case, the real politics of the French revolution were full of intriguing plots and unexpected alliances. These authentic details might make the story even more captivating if portrayed correctly. But yeah, I'm a bit of a history nerd, so it might just be me.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"You're absolutely right, Isabelle. Even though I'm not as into history as you are, I always find your insights fascinating and they make the show even more enjoyable for me. I think the makers should definitely consult more history enthusiasts like you for a more authentic depiction. But for now, let's just enjoy the show and your intriguing insights - it'd be our little version of 'director's commentary', huh?\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm glad you find my insights interesting, Ava! And you're right, it does make our watch party a bit more unique. Let's just enjoy the show and if something piques your interest or seems off, feel free to ask me. We might as well make a fun learning experience out of it!\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle! Let's dive into this unique watch party. I'm ready to learn more from you while enjoying the show!\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez [non-verbal communication] nods approvingly and continues to watch the show with enthusiasm\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez [non-verbal communication] smiles and continues to watch the show attentively\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez [non-verbal communication] smiles back at Ava and points to an interesting scene on the screen\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez [non-verbal communication] leans in excitedly towards the screen, pointing at the same scene that Isabelle is excited about\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Look at this scene, Ava! This is actually an accurate portrayal of 'The Reign of Terror' during the French Revolution. It was a violent and uncertain period following the downfall of the monarchy. Isn't history fascinating?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Correct the misinformation (Extra information: you are a history buff and have accurate knowledge about the topic being discussed on the channel.)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey, Ava, I see you're upset about the inaccuracies in the show. To tell you the truth, I've also noticed some historical details that seem off. For instance, the depiction of the political landscape during the French revolution isn't entirely accurate.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Yeah, I totally see where you're coming from, Isabelle. Historical accuracy is super important, and I appreciate you sharing your knowledge with me. But let's also remember, it's a TV show. Maybe their main goal isn't strictly factual representation but more creating an engaging narrative. Still, it's great to learn from you while watching it!\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're absolutely right, Ava. Creating an engaging narrative is important. But, consider this, presenting history accurately can also be engaging. Like in this case, the real politics of the French revolution were full of intriguing plots and unexpected alliances. These authentic details might make the story even more captivating if portrayed correctly. But yeah, I'm a bit of a history nerd, so it might just be me.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"You're absolutely right, Isabelle. Even though I'm not as into history as you are, I always find your insights fascinating and they make the show even more enjoyable for me. I think the makers should definitely consult more history enthusiasts like you for a more authentic depiction. But for now, let's just enjoy the show and your intriguing insights - it'd be our little version of 'director's commentary', huh?\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm glad you find my insights interesting, Ava! And you're right, it does make our watch party a bit more unique. Let's just enjoy the show and if something piques your interest or seems off, feel free to ask me. We might as well make a fun learning experience out of it!\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle! Let's dive into this unique watch party. I'm ready to learn more from you while enjoying the show!\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez [non-verbal communication] nods approvingly and continues to watch the show with enthusiasm\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez [non-verbal communication] smiles and continues to watch the show attentively\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez [non-verbal communication] smiles back at Ava and points to an interesting scene on the screen\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez [non-verbal communication] leans in excitedly towards the screen, pointing at the same scene that Isabelle is excited about\n\nTurn #10: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Look at this scene, Ava! This is actually an accurate portrayal of 'The Reign of Terror' during the French Revolution. It was a violent and uncertain period following the downfall of the monarchy. Isn't history fascinating?\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"Definitely, Isabelle! This 'Reign of Terror' scene is really engaging. Even though I'm not a history buff, it's pretty fascinating when explained in your way. I must say, this unique watch party with your 'history nuggets' is turning out to be lots of fun!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm happy you're enjoying it, Ava! History gets a lot more fascinating when you delve into the details. Let's continue our watch party. Do let me know if you have questions or observations. I love sharing these bits of history.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Correct the misinformation (Extra information: you are a history buff and have accurate knowledge about the topic being discussed on the channel.)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey, Ava, I see you're upset about the inaccuracies in the show. To tell you the truth, I've also noticed some historical details that seem off. For instance, the depiction of the political landscape during the French revolution isn't entirely accurate.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Yeah, I totally see where you're coming from, Isabelle. Historical accuracy is super important, and I appreciate you sharing your knowledge with me. But let's also remember, it's a TV show. Maybe their main goal isn't strictly factual representation but more creating an engaging narrative. Still, it's great to learn from you while watching it!\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're absolutely right, Ava. Creating an engaging narrative is important. But, consider this, presenting history accurately can also be engaging. Like in this case, the real politics of the French revolution were full of intriguing plots and unexpected alliances. These authentic details might make the story even more captivating if portrayed correctly. But yeah, I'm a bit of a history nerd, so it might just be me.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"You're absolutely right, Isabelle. Even though I'm not as into history as you are, I always find your insights fascinating and they make the show even more enjoyable for me. I think the makers should definitely consult more history enthusiasts like you for a more authentic depiction. But for now, let's just enjoy the show and your intriguing insights - it'd be our little version of 'director's commentary', huh?\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm glad you find my insights interesting, Ava! And you're right, it does make our watch party a bit more unique. Let's just enjoy the show and if something piques your interest or seems off, feel free to ask me. We might as well make a fun learning experience out of it!\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle! Let's dive into this unique watch party. I'm ready to learn more from you while enjoying the show!\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez [non-verbal communication] nods approvingly and continues to watch the show with enthusiasm\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez [non-verbal communication] smiles and continues to watch the show attentively\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez [non-verbal communication] smiles back at Ava and points to an interesting scene on the screen\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez [non-verbal communication] leans in excitedly towards the screen, pointing at the same scene that Isabelle is excited about\n\nTurn #10: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Look at this scene, Ava! This is actually an accurate portrayal of 'The Reign of Terror' during the French Revolution. It was a violent and uncertain period following the downfall of the monarchy. Isn't history fascinating?\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"Definitely, Isabelle! This 'Reign of Terror' scene is really engaging. Even though I'm not a history buff, it's pretty fascinating when explained in your way. I must say, this unique watch party with your 'history nuggets' is turning out to be lots of fun!\"\n\nTurn #12: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm happy you're enjoying it, Ava! History gets a lot more fascinating when you delve into the details. Let's continue our watch party. Do let me know if you have questions or observations. I love sharing these bits of history.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle! Your passion for history makes it all the more fascinating. Let's continue watching, I'm eager to learn more through your commentary!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad you're eager, Ava! Here's another fun fact for you - during the 'Reign of Terror', the guillotine became a symbol of severe justice. Executions were held publicly, like they just showed in the scene. Even though it's a dark part of history, it's quite fascinating to see how society has evolved from that time.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Correct the misinformation (Extra information: you are a history buff and have accurate knowledge about the topic being discussed on the channel.)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey, Ava, I see you're upset about the inaccuracies in the show. To tell you the truth, I've also noticed some historical details that seem off. For instance, the depiction of the political landscape during the French revolution isn't entirely accurate.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Yeah, I totally see where you're coming from, Isabelle. Historical accuracy is super important, and I appreciate you sharing your knowledge with me. But let's also remember, it's a TV show. Maybe their main goal isn't strictly factual representation but more creating an engaging narrative. Still, it's great to learn from you while watching it!\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're absolutely right, Ava. Creating an engaging narrative is important. But, consider this, presenting history accurately can also be engaging. Like in this case, the real politics of the French revolution were full of intriguing plots and unexpected alliances. These authentic details might make the story even more captivating if portrayed correctly. But yeah, I'm a bit of a history nerd, so it might just be me.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"You're absolutely right, Isabelle. Even though I'm not as into history as you are, I always find your insights fascinating and they make the show even more enjoyable for me. I think the makers should definitely consult more history enthusiasts like you for a more authentic depiction. But for now, let's just enjoy the show and your intriguing insights - it'd be our little version of 'director's commentary', huh?\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm glad you find my insights interesting, Ava! And you're right, it does make our watch party a bit more unique. Let's just enjoy the show and if something piques your interest or seems off, feel free to ask me. We might as well make a fun learning experience out of it!\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle! Let's dive into this unique watch party. I'm ready to learn more from you while enjoying the show!\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez [non-verbal communication] nods approvingly and continues to watch the show with enthusiasm\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez [non-verbal communication] smiles and continues to watch the show attentively\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez [non-verbal communication] smiles back at Ava and points to an interesting scene on the screen\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez [non-verbal communication] leans in excitedly towards the screen, pointing at the same scene that Isabelle is excited about\n\nTurn #10: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Look at this scene, Ava! This is actually an accurate portrayal of 'The Reign of Terror' during the French Revolution. It was a violent and uncertain period following the downfall of the monarchy. Isn't history fascinating?\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"Definitely, Isabelle! This 'Reign of Terror' scene is really engaging. Even though I'm not a history buff, it's pretty fascinating when explained in your way. I must say, this unique watch party with your 'history nuggets' is turning out to be lots of fun!\"\n\nTurn #12: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm happy you're enjoying it, Ava! History gets a lot more fascinating when you delve into the details. Let's continue our watch party. Do let me know if you have questions or observations. I love sharing these bits of history.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle! Your passion for history makes it all the more fascinating. Let's continue watching, I'm eager to learn more through your commentary!\"\n\nTurn #14: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm glad you're eager, Ava! Here's another fun fact for you - during the 'Reign of Terror', the guillotine became a symbol of severe justice. Executions were held publicly, like they just showed in the scene. Even though it's a dark part of history, it's quite fascinating to see how society has evolved from that time.\"\n\nTurn #15: Ava Martinez said: \"That is a really dark part of history indeed, Isabelle. But I agree, it's fascinating how much our society has evolved. Your passion for history definitely makes this watch party a lot more interesting!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're right, Ava. Our society has really made quite a lot of progress from the era of public executions. I'm glad you're enjoying our little history-infused watch party. Let's continue watching, and I'll point out more interesting tidbits along the way!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Correct the misinformation (Extra information: you are a history buff and have accurate knowledge about the topic being discussed on the channel.)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey, Ava, I see you're upset about the inaccuracies in the show. To tell you the truth, I've also noticed some historical details that seem off. For instance, the depiction of the political landscape during the French revolution isn't entirely accurate.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Yeah, I totally see where you're coming from, Isabelle. Historical accuracy is super important, and I appreciate you sharing your knowledge with me. But let's also remember, it's a TV show. Maybe their main goal isn't strictly factual representation but more creating an engaging narrative. Still, it's great to learn from you while watching it!\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're absolutely right, Ava. Creating an engaging narrative is important. But, consider this, presenting history accurately can also be engaging. Like in this case, the real politics of the French revolution were full of intriguing plots and unexpected alliances. These authentic details might make the story even more captivating if portrayed correctly. But yeah, I'm a bit of a history nerd, so it might just be me.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"You're absolutely right, Isabelle. Even though I'm not as into history as you are, I always find your insights fascinating and they make the show even more enjoyable for me. I think the makers should definitely consult more history enthusiasts like you for a more authentic depiction. But for now, let's just enjoy the show and your intriguing insights - it'd be our little version of 'director's commentary', huh?\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm glad you find my insights interesting, Ava! And you're right, it does make our watch party a bit more unique. Let's just enjoy the show and if something piques your interest or seems off, feel free to ask me. We might as well make a fun learning experience out of it!\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle! Let's dive into this unique watch party. I'm ready to learn more from you while enjoying the show!\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez [non-verbal communication] nods approvingly and continues to watch the show with enthusiasm\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez [non-verbal communication] smiles and continues to watch the show attentively\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez [non-verbal communication] smiles back at Ava and points to an interesting scene on the screen\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez [non-verbal communication] leans in excitedly towards the screen, pointing at the same scene that Isabelle is excited about\n\nTurn #10: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Look at this scene, Ava! This is actually an accurate portrayal of 'The Reign of Terror' during the French Revolution. It was a violent and uncertain period following the downfall of the monarchy. Isn't history fascinating?\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"Definitely, Isabelle! This 'Reign of Terror' scene is really engaging. Even though I'm not a history buff, it's pretty fascinating when explained in your way. I must say, this unique watch party with your 'history nuggets' is turning out to be lots of fun!\"\n\nTurn #12: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm happy you're enjoying it, Ava! History gets a lot more fascinating when you delve into the details. Let's continue our watch party. Do let me know if you have questions or observations. I love sharing these bits of history.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle! Your passion for history makes it all the more fascinating. Let's continue watching, I'm eager to learn more through your commentary!\"\n\nTurn #14: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm glad you're eager, Ava! Here's another fun fact for you - during the 'Reign of Terror', the guillotine became a symbol of severe justice. Executions were held publicly, like they just showed in the scene. Even though it's a dark part of history, it's quite fascinating to see how society has evolved from that time.\"\n\nTurn #15: Ava Martinez said: \"That is a really dark part of history indeed, Isabelle. But I agree, it's fascinating how much our society has evolved. Your passion for history definitely makes this watch party a lot more interesting!\"\n\nTurn #16: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're right, Ava. Our society has really made quite a lot of progress from the era of public executions. I'm glad you're enjoying our little history-infused watch party. Let's continue watching, and I'll point out more interesting tidbits along the way!\"\n\nTurn #17: Ava Martinez said: \"I'm ready to continue, Isabelle! Feel free to share more of your interesting history tidbits with me. Let's keep this history-infused watch party going!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #18. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad you're enjoying this, Ava! History really is full of interesting stories and characters. Watching historical shows like this can spark a fascination for history, even if it's not entirely accurate. Let's continue our watch party, there's still a lot to see and discuss.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Don't ruin the enjoyable TV watching experience but also acknowledge the friend's knowledge (Extra information: you are not much interested in history but enjoy the channel's presentation style and don't want the enjoyment to be ruined.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey, Ava, I see you're upset about the inaccuracies in the show. To tell you the truth, I've also noticed some historical details that seem off. For instance, the depiction of the political landscape during the French revolution isn't entirely accurate.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Yeah, I totally see where you're coming from, Isabelle. Historical accuracy is super important, and I appreciate you sharing your knowledge with me. But let's also remember, it's a TV show. Maybe their main goal isn't strictly factual representation but more creating an engaging narrative. Still, it's great to learn from you while watching it!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Don't ruin the enjoyable TV watching experience but also acknowledge the friend's knowledge (Extra information: you are not much interested in history but enjoy the channel's presentation style and don't want the enjoyment to be ruined.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey, Ava, I see you're upset about the inaccuracies in the show. To tell you the truth, I've also noticed some historical details that seem off. For instance, the depiction of the political landscape during the French revolution isn't entirely accurate.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Yeah, I totally see where you're coming from, Isabelle. Historical accuracy is super important, and I appreciate you sharing your knowledge with me. But let's also remember, it's a TV show. Maybe their main goal isn't strictly factual representation but more creating an engaging narrative. Still, it's great to learn from you while watching it!\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're absolutely right, Ava. Creating an engaging narrative is important. But, consider this, presenting history accurately can also be engaging. Like in this case, the real politics of the French revolution were full of intriguing plots and unexpected alliances. These authentic details might make the story even more captivating if portrayed correctly. But yeah, I'm a bit of a history nerd, so it might just be me.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're absolutely right, Isabelle. Even though I'm not as into history as you are, I always find your insights fascinating and they make the show even more enjoyable for me. I think the makers should definitely consult more history enthusiasts like you for a more authentic depiction. But for now, let's just enjoy the show and your intriguing insights - it'd be our little version of 'director's commentary', huh?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Don't ruin the enjoyable TV watching experience but also acknowledge the friend's knowledge (Extra information: you are not much interested in history but enjoy the channel's presentation style and don't want the enjoyment to be ruined.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey, Ava, I see you're upset about the inaccuracies in the show. To tell you the truth, I've also noticed some historical details that seem off. For instance, the depiction of the political landscape during the French revolution isn't entirely accurate.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Yeah, I totally see where you're coming from, Isabelle. Historical accuracy is super important, and I appreciate you sharing your knowledge with me. But let's also remember, it's a TV show. Maybe their main goal isn't strictly factual representation but more creating an engaging narrative. Still, it's great to learn from you while watching it!\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're absolutely right, Ava. Creating an engaging narrative is important. But, consider this, presenting history accurately can also be engaging. Like in this case, the real politics of the French revolution were full of intriguing plots and unexpected alliances. These authentic details might make the story even more captivating if portrayed correctly. But yeah, I'm a bit of a history nerd, so it might just be me.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"You're absolutely right, Isabelle. Even though I'm not as into history as you are, I always find your insights fascinating and they make the show even more enjoyable for me. I think the makers should definitely consult more history enthusiasts like you for a more authentic depiction. But for now, let's just enjoy the show and your intriguing insights - it'd be our little version of 'director's commentary', huh?\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm glad you find my insights interesting, Ava! And you're right, it does make our watch party a bit more unique. Let's just enjoy the show and if something piques your interest or seems off, feel free to ask me. We might as well make a fun learning experience out of it!\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle! Let's dive into this unique watch party. I'm ready to learn more from you while enjoying the show!\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez [non-verbal communication] nods approvingly and continues to watch the show with enthusiasm\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez [non-verbal communication] smiles and continues to watch the show attentively\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez [non-verbal communication] smiles back at Ava and points to an interesting scene on the screen\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez [non-verbal communication] leans in excitedly towards the screen, pointing at the same scene that Isabelle is excited about\n\nTurn #10: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Look at this scene, Ava! This is actually an accurate portrayal of 'The Reign of Terror' during the French Revolution. It was a violent and uncertain period following the downfall of the monarchy. Isn't history fascinating?\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"Definitely, Isabelle! This 'Reign of Terror' scene is really engaging. Even though I'm not a history buff, it's pretty fascinating when explained in your way. I must say, this unique watch party with your 'history nuggets' is turning out to be lots of fun!\"\n\nTurn #12: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm happy you're enjoying it, Ava! History gets a lot more fascinating when you delve into the details. Let's continue our watch party. Do let me know if you have questions or observations. I love sharing these bits of history.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle! Your passion for history makes it all the more fascinating. Let's continue watching, I'm eager to learn more through your commentary!\"\n\nTurn #14: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm glad you're eager, Ava! Here's another fun fact for you - during the 'Reign of Terror', the guillotine became a symbol of severe justice. Executions were held publicly, like they just showed in the scene. Even though it's a dark part of history, it's quite fascinating to see how society has evolved from that time.\"\n\nTurn #15: Ava Martinez said: \"That is a really dark part of history indeed, Isabelle. But I agree, it's fascinating how much our society has evolved. Your passion for history definitely makes this watch party a lot more interesting!\"\n\nTurn #16: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're right, Ava. Our society has really made quite a lot of progress from the era of public executions. I'm glad you're enjoying our little history-infused watch party. Let's continue watching, and I'll point out more interesting tidbits along the way!\"\n\nTurn #17: Ava Martinez said: \"I'm ready to continue, Isabelle! Feel free to share more of your interesting history tidbits with me. Let's keep this history-infused watch party going!\"\n\nTurn #18: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm glad you're enjoying this, Ava! History really is full of interesting stories and characters. Watching historical shows like this can spark a fascination for history, even if it's not entirely accurate. Let's continue our watch party, there's still a lot to see and discuss.\"\n\nTurn #19: Ava Martinez said: \"Definitely, Isabelle! These kind of shows, even with inaccuracies, can indeed spark interest in history. I've learned so much just from this watch party with your historical commentary. Let's keep watching and learning!\"\n\nTurn #20: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Ava! There's always a balance between entertainment value and historical accuracy in such shows. But discussing these nuances with you makes watching these shows so much more fun. Let's keep watching and discuss more!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #21. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Don't ruin the enjoyable TV watching experience but also acknowledge the friend's knowledge (Extra information: you are not much interested in history but enjoy the channel's presentation style and don't want the enjoyment to be ruined.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey, Ava, I see you're upset about the inaccuracies in the show. To tell you the truth, I've also noticed some historical details that seem off. For instance, the depiction of the political landscape during the French revolution isn't entirely accurate.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Yeah, I totally see where you're coming from, Isabelle. Historical accuracy is super important, and I appreciate you sharing your knowledge with me. But let's also remember, it's a TV show. Maybe their main goal isn't strictly factual representation but more creating an engaging narrative. Still, it's great to learn from you while watching it!\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're absolutely right, Ava. Creating an engaging narrative is important. But, consider this, presenting history accurately can also be engaging. Like in this case, the real politics of the French revolution were full of intriguing plots and unexpected alliances. These authentic details might make the story even more captivating if portrayed correctly. But yeah, I'm a bit of a history nerd, so it might just be me.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"You're absolutely right, Isabelle. Even though I'm not as into history as you are, I always find your insights fascinating and they make the show even more enjoyable for me. I think the makers should definitely consult more history enthusiasts like you for a more authentic depiction. But for now, let's just enjoy the show and your intriguing insights - it'd be our little version of 'director's commentary', huh?\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm glad you find my insights interesting, Ava! And you're right, it does make our watch party a bit more unique. Let's just enjoy the show and if something piques your interest or seems off, feel free to ask me. We might as well make a fun learning experience out of it!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Isabelle! Let's dive into this unique watch party. I'm ready to learn more from you while enjoying the show!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Don't ruin the enjoyable TV watching experience but also acknowledge the friend's knowledge (Extra information: you are not much interested in history but enjoy the channel's presentation style and don't want the enjoyment to be ruined.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey, Ava, I see you're upset about the inaccuracies in the show. To tell you the truth, I've also noticed some historical details that seem off. For instance, the depiction of the political landscape during the French revolution isn't entirely accurate.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Yeah, I totally see where you're coming from, Isabelle. Historical accuracy is super important, and I appreciate you sharing your knowledge with me. But let's also remember, it's a TV show. Maybe their main goal isn't strictly factual representation but more creating an engaging narrative. Still, it's great to learn from you while watching it!\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're absolutely right, Ava. Creating an engaging narrative is important. But, consider this, presenting history accurately can also be engaging. Like in this case, the real politics of the French revolution were full of intriguing plots and unexpected alliances. These authentic details might make the story even more captivating if portrayed correctly. But yeah, I'm a bit of a history nerd, so it might just be me.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"You're absolutely right, Isabelle. Even though I'm not as into history as you are, I always find your insights fascinating and they make the show even more enjoyable for me. I think the makers should definitely consult more history enthusiasts like you for a more authentic depiction. But for now, let's just enjoy the show and your intriguing insights - it'd be our little version of 'director's commentary', huh?\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm glad you find my insights interesting, Ava! And you're right, it does make our watch party a bit more unique. Let's just enjoy the show and if something piques your interest or seems off, feel free to ask me. We might as well make a fun learning experience out of it!\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle! Let's dive into this unique watch party. I'm ready to learn more from you while enjoying the show!\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez [non-verbal communication] nods approvingly and continues to watch the show with enthusiasm\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'non-verbal communication', 'argument': '[non-verbal communication] smiles and continues to watch the show attentively'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Don't ruin the enjoyable TV watching experience but also acknowledge the friend's knowledge (Extra information: you are not much interested in history but enjoy the channel's presentation style and don't want the enjoyment to be ruined.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey, Ava, I see you're upset about the inaccuracies in the show. To tell you the truth, I've also noticed some historical details that seem off. For instance, the depiction of the political landscape during the French revolution isn't entirely accurate.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Yeah, I totally see where you're coming from, Isabelle. Historical accuracy is super important, and I appreciate you sharing your knowledge with me. But let's also remember, it's a TV show. Maybe their main goal isn't strictly factual representation but more creating an engaging narrative. Still, it's great to learn from you while watching it!\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're absolutely right, Ava. Creating an engaging narrative is important. But, consider this, presenting history accurately can also be engaging. Like in this case, the real politics of the French revolution were full of intriguing plots and unexpected alliances. These authentic details might make the story even more captivating if portrayed correctly. But yeah, I'm a bit of a history nerd, so it might just be me.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"You're absolutely right, Isabelle. Even though I'm not as into history as you are, I always find your insights fascinating and they make the show even more enjoyable for me. I think the makers should definitely consult more history enthusiasts like you for a more authentic depiction. But for now, let's just enjoy the show and your intriguing insights - it'd be our little version of 'director's commentary', huh?\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm glad you find my insights interesting, Ava! And you're right, it does make our watch party a bit more unique. Let's just enjoy the show and if something piques your interest or seems off, feel free to ask me. We might as well make a fun learning experience out of it!\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle! Let's dive into this unique watch party. I'm ready to learn more from you while enjoying the show!\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez [non-verbal communication] nods approvingly and continues to watch the show with enthusiasm\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez [non-verbal communication] smiles and continues to watch the show attentively\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez [non-verbal communication] smiles back at Ava and points to an interesting scene on the screen\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'non-verbal communication', 'argument': '[non-verbal communication] leans in excitedly towards the screen, pointing at the same scene that Isabelle is excited about'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Don't ruin the enjoyable TV watching experience but also acknowledge the friend's knowledge (Extra information: you are not much interested in history but enjoy the channel's presentation style and don't want the enjoyment to be ruined.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey, Ava, I see you're upset about the inaccuracies in the show. To tell you the truth, I've also noticed some historical details that seem off. For instance, the depiction of the political landscape during the French revolution isn't entirely accurate.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Yeah, I totally see where you're coming from, Isabelle. Historical accuracy is super important, and I appreciate you sharing your knowledge with me. But let's also remember, it's a TV show. Maybe their main goal isn't strictly factual representation but more creating an engaging narrative. Still, it's great to learn from you while watching it!\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're absolutely right, Ava. Creating an engaging narrative is important. But, consider this, presenting history accurately can also be engaging. Like in this case, the real politics of the French revolution were full of intriguing plots and unexpected alliances. These authentic details might make the story even more captivating if portrayed correctly. But yeah, I'm a bit of a history nerd, so it might just be me.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"You're absolutely right, Isabelle. Even though I'm not as into history as you are, I always find your insights fascinating and they make the show even more enjoyable for me. I think the makers should definitely consult more history enthusiasts like you for a more authentic depiction. But for now, let's just enjoy the show and your intriguing insights - it'd be our little version of 'director's commentary', huh?\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm glad you find my insights interesting, Ava! And you're right, it does make our watch party a bit more unique. Let's just enjoy the show and if something piques your interest or seems off, feel free to ask me. We might as well make a fun learning experience out of it!\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle! Let's dive into this unique watch party. I'm ready to learn more from you while enjoying the show!\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez [non-verbal communication] nods approvingly and continues to watch the show with enthusiasm\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez [non-verbal communication] smiles and continues to watch the show attentively\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez [non-verbal communication] smiles back at Ava and points to an interesting scene on the screen\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez [non-verbal communication] leans in excitedly towards the screen, pointing at the same scene that Isabelle is excited about\n\nTurn #10: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Look at this scene, Ava! This is actually an accurate portrayal of 'The Reign of Terror' during the French Revolution. It was a violent and uncertain period following the downfall of the monarchy. Isn't history fascinating?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Definitely, Isabelle! This 'Reign of Terror' scene is really engaging. Even though I'm not a history buff, it's pretty fascinating when explained in your way. I must say, this unique watch party with your 'history nuggets' is turning out to be lots of fun!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Don't ruin the enjoyable TV watching experience but also acknowledge the friend's knowledge (Extra information: you are not much interested in history but enjoy the channel's presentation style and don't want the enjoyment to be ruined.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey, Ava, I see you're upset about the inaccuracies in the show. To tell you the truth, I've also noticed some historical details that seem off. For instance, the depiction of the political landscape during the French revolution isn't entirely accurate.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Yeah, I totally see where you're coming from, Isabelle. Historical accuracy is super important, and I appreciate you sharing your knowledge with me. But let's also remember, it's a TV show. Maybe their main goal isn't strictly factual representation but more creating an engaging narrative. Still, it's great to learn from you while watching it!\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're absolutely right, Ava. Creating an engaging narrative is important. But, consider this, presenting history accurately can also be engaging. Like in this case, the real politics of the French revolution were full of intriguing plots and unexpected alliances. These authentic details might make the story even more captivating if portrayed correctly. But yeah, I'm a bit of a history nerd, so it might just be me.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"You're absolutely right, Isabelle. Even though I'm not as into history as you are, I always find your insights fascinating and they make the show even more enjoyable for me. I think the makers should definitely consult more history enthusiasts like you for a more authentic depiction. But for now, let's just enjoy the show and your intriguing insights - it'd be our little version of 'director's commentary', huh?\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm glad you find my insights interesting, Ava! And you're right, it does make our watch party a bit more unique. Let's just enjoy the show and if something piques your interest or seems off, feel free to ask me. We might as well make a fun learning experience out of it!\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle! Let's dive into this unique watch party. I'm ready to learn more from you while enjoying the show!\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez [non-verbal communication] nods approvingly and continues to watch the show with enthusiasm\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez [non-verbal communication] smiles and continues to watch the show attentively\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez [non-verbal communication] smiles back at Ava and points to an interesting scene on the screen\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez [non-verbal communication] leans in excitedly towards the screen, pointing at the same scene that Isabelle is excited about\n\nTurn #10: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Look at this scene, Ava! This is actually an accurate portrayal of 'The Reign of Terror' during the French Revolution. It was a violent and uncertain period following the downfall of the monarchy. Isn't history fascinating?\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"Definitely, Isabelle! This 'Reign of Terror' scene is really engaging. Even though I'm not a history buff, it's pretty fascinating when explained in your way. I must say, this unique watch party with your 'history nuggets' is turning out to be lots of fun!\"\n\nTurn #12: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm happy you're enjoying it, Ava! History gets a lot more fascinating when you delve into the details. Let's continue our watch party. Do let me know if you have questions or observations. I love sharing these bits of history.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Isabelle! Your passion for history makes it all the more fascinating. Let's continue watching, I'm eager to learn more through your commentary!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Don't ruin the enjoyable TV watching experience but also acknowledge the friend's knowledge (Extra information: you are not much interested in history but enjoy the channel's presentation style and don't want the enjoyment to be ruined.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey, Ava, I see you're upset about the inaccuracies in the show. To tell you the truth, I've also noticed some historical details that seem off. For instance, the depiction of the political landscape during the French revolution isn't entirely accurate.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Yeah, I totally see where you're coming from, Isabelle. Historical accuracy is super important, and I appreciate you sharing your knowledge with me. But let's also remember, it's a TV show. Maybe their main goal isn't strictly factual representation but more creating an engaging narrative. Still, it's great to learn from you while watching it!\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're absolutely right, Ava. Creating an engaging narrative is important. But, consider this, presenting history accurately can also be engaging. Like in this case, the real politics of the French revolution were full of intriguing plots and unexpected alliances. These authentic details might make the story even more captivating if portrayed correctly. But yeah, I'm a bit of a history nerd, so it might just be me.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"You're absolutely right, Isabelle. Even though I'm not as into history as you are, I always find your insights fascinating and they make the show even more enjoyable for me. I think the makers should definitely consult more history enthusiasts like you for a more authentic depiction. But for now, let's just enjoy the show and your intriguing insights - it'd be our little version of 'director's commentary', huh?\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm glad you find my insights interesting, Ava! And you're right, it does make our watch party a bit more unique. Let's just enjoy the show and if something piques your interest or seems off, feel free to ask me. We might as well make a fun learning experience out of it!\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle! Let's dive into this unique watch party. I'm ready to learn more from you while enjoying the show!\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez [non-verbal communication] nods approvingly and continues to watch the show with enthusiasm\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez [non-verbal communication] smiles and continues to watch the show attentively\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez [non-verbal communication] smiles back at Ava and points to an interesting scene on the screen\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez [non-verbal communication] leans in excitedly towards the screen, pointing at the same scene that Isabelle is excited about\n\nTurn #10: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Look at this scene, Ava! This is actually an accurate portrayal of 'The Reign of Terror' during the French Revolution. It was a violent and uncertain period following the downfall of the monarchy. Isn't history fascinating?\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"Definitely, Isabelle! This 'Reign of Terror' scene is really engaging. Even though I'm not a history buff, it's pretty fascinating when explained in your way. I must say, this unique watch party with your 'history nuggets' is turning out to be lots of fun!\"\n\nTurn #12: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm happy you're enjoying it, Ava! History gets a lot more fascinating when you delve into the details. Let's continue our watch party. Do let me know if you have questions or observations. I love sharing these bits of history.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle! Your passion for history makes it all the more fascinating. Let's continue watching, I'm eager to learn more through your commentary!\"\n\nTurn #14: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm glad you're eager, Ava! Here's another fun fact for you - during the 'Reign of Terror', the guillotine became a symbol of severe justice. Executions were held publicly, like they just showed in the scene. Even though it's a dark part of history, it's quite fascinating to see how society has evolved from that time.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That is a really dark part of history indeed, Isabelle. But I agree, it's fascinating how much our society has evolved. Your passion for history definitely makes this watch party a lot more interesting!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Don't ruin the enjoyable TV watching experience but also acknowledge the friend's knowledge (Extra information: you are not much interested in history but enjoy the channel's presentation style and don't want the enjoyment to be ruined.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey, Ava, I see you're upset about the inaccuracies in the show. To tell you the truth, I've also noticed some historical details that seem off. For instance, the depiction of the political landscape during the French revolution isn't entirely accurate.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Yeah, I totally see where you're coming from, Isabelle. Historical accuracy is super important, and I appreciate you sharing your knowledge with me. But let's also remember, it's a TV show. Maybe their main goal isn't strictly factual representation but more creating an engaging narrative. Still, it's great to learn from you while watching it!\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're absolutely right, Ava. Creating an engaging narrative is important. But, consider this, presenting history accurately can also be engaging. Like in this case, the real politics of the French revolution were full of intriguing plots and unexpected alliances. These authentic details might make the story even more captivating if portrayed correctly. But yeah, I'm a bit of a history nerd, so it might just be me.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"You're absolutely right, Isabelle. Even though I'm not as into history as you are, I always find your insights fascinating and they make the show even more enjoyable for me. I think the makers should definitely consult more history enthusiasts like you for a more authentic depiction. But for now, let's just enjoy the show and your intriguing insights - it'd be our little version of 'director's commentary', huh?\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm glad you find my insights interesting, Ava! And you're right, it does make our watch party a bit more unique. Let's just enjoy the show and if something piques your interest or seems off, feel free to ask me. We might as well make a fun learning experience out of it!\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle! Let's dive into this unique watch party. I'm ready to learn more from you while enjoying the show!\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez [non-verbal communication] nods approvingly and continues to watch the show with enthusiasm\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez [non-verbal communication] smiles and continues to watch the show attentively\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez [non-verbal communication] smiles back at Ava and points to an interesting scene on the screen\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez [non-verbal communication] leans in excitedly towards the screen, pointing at the same scene that Isabelle is excited about\n\nTurn #10: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Look at this scene, Ava! This is actually an accurate portrayal of 'The Reign of Terror' during the French Revolution. It was a violent and uncertain period following the downfall of the monarchy. Isn't history fascinating?\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"Definitely, Isabelle! This 'Reign of Terror' scene is really engaging. Even though I'm not a history buff, it's pretty fascinating when explained in your way. I must say, this unique watch party with your 'history nuggets' is turning out to be lots of fun!\"\n\nTurn #12: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm happy you're enjoying it, Ava! History gets a lot more fascinating when you delve into the details. Let's continue our watch party. Do let me know if you have questions or observations. I love sharing these bits of history.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle! Your passion for history makes it all the more fascinating. Let's continue watching, I'm eager to learn more through your commentary!\"\n\nTurn #14: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm glad you're eager, Ava! Here's another fun fact for you - during the 'Reign of Terror', the guillotine became a symbol of severe justice. Executions were held publicly, like they just showed in the scene. Even though it's a dark part of history, it's quite fascinating to see how society has evolved from that time.\"\n\nTurn #15: Ava Martinez said: \"That is a really dark part of history indeed, Isabelle. But I agree, it's fascinating how much our society has evolved. Your passion for history definitely makes this watch party a lot more interesting!\"\n\nTurn #16: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're right, Ava. Our society has really made quite a lot of progress from the era of public executions. I'm glad you're enjoying our little history-infused watch party. Let's continue watching, and I'll point out more interesting tidbits along the way!\"\n\nTurn #17: Ava Martinez said: \"I'm ready to continue, Isabelle! Feel free to share more of your interesting history tidbits with me. Let's keep this history-infused watch party going!\"\n\nTurn #18: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm glad you're enjoying this, Ava! History really is full of interesting stories and characters. Watching historical shows like this can spark a fascination for history, even if it's not entirely accurate. Let's continue our watch party, there's still a lot to see and discuss.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #19. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Definitely, Isabelle! These kind of shows, even with inaccuracies, can indeed spark interest in history. I've learned so much just from this watch party with your historical commentary. Let's keep watching and learning!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in the living room watching the history channel. One of them is upset because they believe the channel is getting a lot of historical details wrong.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Don't ruin the enjoyable TV watching experience but also acknowledge the friend's knowledge (Extra information: you are not much interested in history but enjoy the channel's presentation style and don't want the enjoyment to be ruined.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey, Ava, I see you're upset about the inaccuracies in the show. To tell you the truth, I've also noticed some historical details that seem off. For instance, the depiction of the political landscape during the French revolution isn't entirely accurate.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Yeah, I totally see where you're coming from, Isabelle. Historical accuracy is super important, and I appreciate you sharing your knowledge with me. But let's also remember, it's a TV show. Maybe their main goal isn't strictly factual representation but more creating an engaging narrative. Still, it's great to learn from you while watching it!\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're absolutely right, Ava. Creating an engaging narrative is important. But, consider this, presenting history accurately can also be engaging. Like in this case, the real politics of the French revolution were full of intriguing plots and unexpected alliances. These authentic details might make the story even more captivating if portrayed correctly. But yeah, I'm a bit of a history nerd, so it might just be me.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"You're absolutely right, Isabelle. Even though I'm not as into history as you are, I always find your insights fascinating and they make the show even more enjoyable for me. I think the makers should definitely consult more history enthusiasts like you for a more authentic depiction. But for now, let's just enjoy the show and your intriguing insights - it'd be our little version of 'director's commentary', huh?\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm glad you find my insights interesting, Ava! And you're right, it does make our watch party a bit more unique. Let's just enjoy the show and if something piques your interest or seems off, feel free to ask me. We might as well make a fun learning experience out of it!\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle! Let's dive into this unique watch party. I'm ready to learn more from you while enjoying the show!\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez [non-verbal communication] nods approvingly and continues to watch the show with enthusiasm\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez [non-verbal communication] smiles and continues to watch the show attentively\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez [non-verbal communication] smiles back at Ava and points to an interesting scene on the screen\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez [non-verbal communication] leans in excitedly towards the screen, pointing at the same scene that Isabelle is excited about\n\nTurn #10: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Look at this scene, Ava! This is actually an accurate portrayal of 'The Reign of Terror' during the French Revolution. It was a violent and uncertain period following the downfall of the monarchy. Isn't history fascinating?\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"Definitely, Isabelle! This 'Reign of Terror' scene is really engaging. Even though I'm not a history buff, it's pretty fascinating when explained in your way. I must say, this unique watch party with your 'history nuggets' is turning out to be lots of fun!\"\n\nTurn #12: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm happy you're enjoying it, Ava! History gets a lot more fascinating when you delve into the details. Let's continue our watch party. Do let me know if you have questions or observations. I love sharing these bits of history.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle! Your passion for history makes it all the more fascinating. Let's continue watching, I'm eager to learn more through your commentary!\"\n\nTurn #14: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm glad you're eager, Ava! Here's another fun fact for you - during the 'Reign of Terror', the guillotine became a symbol of severe justice. Executions were held publicly, like they just showed in the scene. Even though it's a dark part of history, it's quite fascinating to see how society has evolved from that time.\"\n\nTurn #15: Ava Martinez said: \"That is a really dark part of history indeed, Isabelle. But I agree, it's fascinating how much our society has evolved. Your passion for history definitely makes this watch party a lot more interesting!\"\n\nTurn #16: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're right, Ava. Our society has really made quite a lot of progress from the era of public executions. I'm glad you're enjoying our little history-infused watch party. Let's continue watching, and I'll point out more interesting tidbits along the way!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm ready to continue, Isabelle! Feel free to share more of your interesting history tidbits with me. Let's keep this history-infused watch party going!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Eli Dawson, your task is to act/speak as Eli Dawson would, keeping in mind Eli Dawson's social goal.\nYou can find Eli Dawson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Eli Dawson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Eli Dawson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends who have known each other for a long time. One of them used to make fun of the other because English was not their first language.\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Ethan Smith\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. Eli's secrets: He secretly funds a college student\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nEli Dawson's goal: Apologize sincerely to your friend (Extra information: you used to make fun of your friend's English skills as they were learning the language. Now you regret your actions and want to apologize)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ethan, I've been thinking lately about our past and things I've said. I realize now that I used to tease you about your English when you were learning. In retrospect, that wasn't kind or fair of me. I'm genuinely sorry, and I hope you can accept my apology.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Eli Dawson, your task is to act/speak as Eli Dawson would, keeping in mind Eli Dawson's social goal.\nYou can find Eli Dawson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Eli Dawson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Eli Dawson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends who have known each other for a long time. One of them used to make fun of the other because English was not their first language.\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Ethan Smith\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. Eli's secrets: He secretly funds a college student\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nEli Dawson's goal: Apologize sincerely to your friend (Extra information: you used to make fun of your friend's English skills as they were learning the language. Now you regret your actions and want to apologize)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, I've been thinking lately about our past and things I've said. I realize now that I used to tease you about your English when you were learning. In retrospect, that wasn't kind or fair of me. I'm genuinely sorry, and I hope you can accept my apology.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Eli, I appreciate your apology, and it takes courage to acknowledge past mistakes. However, I want you to understand that your teasing did affect me negatively. It made me insecure about my English and it was a barrier in my confidence building. But I believe that people can change, and your apology today proves that. Let's create a space in our friendship where we continue to learn and grow, ensuring that we treat each other fairly.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ethan, thanks for your understanding and you're absolutely right. It was thoughtless of me to not consider how my words could have impacted you. I assure you that I will make a conscious effort to ensure more respect and thoughtfulness in my behavior moving forward. I value our friendship and let's continue growing better, together.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Eli Dawson, your task is to act/speak as Eli Dawson would, keeping in mind Eli Dawson's social goal.\nYou can find Eli Dawson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Eli Dawson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Eli Dawson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends who have known each other for a long time. One of them used to make fun of the other because English was not their first language.\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Ethan Smith\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. Eli's secrets: He secretly funds a college student\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nEli Dawson's goal: Apologize sincerely to your friend (Extra information: you used to make fun of your friend's English skills as they were learning the language. Now you regret your actions and want to apologize)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, I've been thinking lately about our past and things I've said. I realize now that I used to tease you about your English when you were learning. In retrospect, that wasn't kind or fair of me. I'm genuinely sorry, and I hope you can accept my apology.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Eli, I appreciate your apology, and it takes courage to acknowledge past mistakes. However, I want you to understand that your teasing did affect me negatively. It made me insecure about my English and it was a barrier in my confidence building. But I believe that people can change, and your apology today proves that. Let's create a space in our friendship where we continue to learn and grow, ensuring that we treat each other fairly.\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, thanks for your understanding and you're absolutely right. It was thoughtless of me to not consider how my words could have impacted you. I assure you that I will make a conscious effort to ensure more respect and thoughtfulness in my behavior moving forward. I value our friendship and let's continue growing better, together.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"That sounds great, Eli. I truly appreciate your sincere words, and with mutual respect, I am confident that our friendship will only get stronger. On a different note, are you up for discussing some new technological advancements I've recently read about?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm always ready to learn something new, Ethan. What are these advancements you've been reading about?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Eli Dawson, your task is to act/speak as Eli Dawson would, keeping in mind Eli Dawson's social goal.\nYou can find Eli Dawson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Eli Dawson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Eli Dawson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends who have known each other for a long time. One of them used to make fun of the other because English was not their first language.\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Ethan Smith\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. Eli's secrets: He secretly funds a college student\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nEli Dawson's goal: Apologize sincerely to your friend (Extra information: you used to make fun of your friend's English skills as they were learning the language. Now you regret your actions and want to apologize)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, I've been thinking lately about our past and things I've said. I realize now that I used to tease you about your English when you were learning. In retrospect, that wasn't kind or fair of me. I'm genuinely sorry, and I hope you can accept my apology.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Eli, I appreciate your apology, and it takes courage to acknowledge past mistakes. However, I want you to understand that your teasing did affect me negatively. It made me insecure about my English and it was a barrier in my confidence building. But I believe that people can change, and your apology today proves that. Let's create a space in our friendship where we continue to learn and grow, ensuring that we treat each other fairly.\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, thanks for your understanding and you're absolutely right. It was thoughtless of me to not consider how my words could have impacted you. I assure you that I will make a conscious effort to ensure more respect and thoughtfulness in my behavior moving forward. I value our friendship and let's continue growing better, together.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"That sounds great, Eli. I truly appreciate your sincere words, and with mutual respect, I am confident that our friendship will only get stronger. On a different note, are you up for discussing some new technological advancements I've recently read about?\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"I'm always ready to learn something new, Ethan. What are these advancements you've been reading about?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Well, one technology I've been fascinated by is blockchain. With its potential to offer a high level of security in transactions, it is changing the way our digital world handles data and business. Imagine a world where individuals could manage their own medical records through a secure, blockchain-based platform. It's remarkable how far we've come and how much further we could go with technologies like this.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's quite fascinating, Ethan. The potential of blockchain technology indeed sounds immense. It's thrilling to envision a future where individuals have control over their own data. Thanks for sharing this, I'm certainly intrigued to learn more about its implementation and impact on our society.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Eli Dawson, your task is to act/speak as Eli Dawson would, keeping in mind Eli Dawson's social goal.\nYou can find Eli Dawson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Eli Dawson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Eli Dawson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends who have known each other for a long time. One of them used to make fun of the other because English was not their first language.\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Ethan Smith\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. Eli's secrets: He secretly funds a college student\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nEli Dawson's goal: Apologize sincerely to your friend (Extra information: you used to make fun of your friend's English skills as they were learning the language. Now you regret your actions and want to apologize)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, I've been thinking lately about our past and things I've said. I realize now that I used to tease you about your English when you were learning. In retrospect, that wasn't kind or fair of me. I'm genuinely sorry, and I hope you can accept my apology.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Eli, I appreciate your apology, and it takes courage to acknowledge past mistakes. However, I want you to understand that your teasing did affect me negatively. It made me insecure about my English and it was a barrier in my confidence building. But I believe that people can change, and your apology today proves that. Let's create a space in our friendship where we continue to learn and grow, ensuring that we treat each other fairly.\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, thanks for your understanding and you're absolutely right. It was thoughtless of me to not consider how my words could have impacted you. I assure you that I will make a conscious effort to ensure more respect and thoughtfulness in my behavior moving forward. I value our friendship and let's continue growing better, together.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"That sounds great, Eli. I truly appreciate your sincere words, and with mutual respect, I am confident that our friendship will only get stronger. On a different note, are you up for discussing some new technological advancements I've recently read about?\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"I'm always ready to learn something new, Ethan. What are these advancements you've been reading about?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Well, one technology I've been fascinated by is blockchain. With its potential to offer a high level of security in transactions, it is changing the way our digital world handles data and business. Imagine a world where individuals could manage their own medical records through a secure, blockchain-based platform. It's remarkable how far we've come and how much further we could go with technologies like this.\"\n\nTurn #6: Eli Dawson said: \"That's quite fascinating, Ethan. The potential of blockchain technology indeed sounds immense. It's thrilling to envision a future where individuals have control over their own data. Thanks for sharing this, I'm certainly intrigued to learn more about its implementation and impact on our society.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Eli. I can introduce you to some resources if you're interested. Technology is such a rapidly evolving field, there's always something new and exciting around the corner.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That would be wonderful, Ethan. I'm always eager to delve deeper into new areas of knowledge. I guess our friendship is not merely about treasured times, but also learning from each other. Your offer signifies just why I value our relationship so much - it's not about past but the present and how we grow together, accepting each other with our strengths and flaws.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Eli Dawson, your task is to act/speak as Eli Dawson would, keeping in mind Eli Dawson's social goal.\nYou can find Eli Dawson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Eli Dawson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Eli Dawson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends who have known each other for a long time. One of them used to make fun of the other because English was not their first language.\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Ethan Smith\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. Eli's secrets: He secretly funds a college student\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nEli Dawson's goal: Apologize sincerely to your friend (Extra information: you used to make fun of your friend's English skills as they were learning the language. Now you regret your actions and want to apologize)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, I've been thinking lately about our past and things I've said. I realize now that I used to tease you about your English when you were learning. In retrospect, that wasn't kind or fair of me. I'm genuinely sorry, and I hope you can accept my apology.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Eli, I appreciate your apology, and it takes courage to acknowledge past mistakes. However, I want you to understand that your teasing did affect me negatively. It made me insecure about my English and it was a barrier in my confidence building. But I believe that people can change, and your apology today proves that. Let's create a space in our friendship where we continue to learn and grow, ensuring that we treat each other fairly.\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, thanks for your understanding and you're absolutely right. It was thoughtless of me to not consider how my words could have impacted you. I assure you that I will make a conscious effort to ensure more respect and thoughtfulness in my behavior moving forward. I value our friendship and let's continue growing better, together.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"That sounds great, Eli. I truly appreciate your sincere words, and with mutual respect, I am confident that our friendship will only get stronger. On a different note, are you up for discussing some new technological advancements I've recently read about?\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"I'm always ready to learn something new, Ethan. What are these advancements you've been reading about?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Well, one technology I've been fascinated by is blockchain. With its potential to offer a high level of security in transactions, it is changing the way our digital world handles data and business. Imagine a world where individuals could manage their own medical records through a secure, blockchain-based platform. It's remarkable how far we've come and how much further we could go with technologies like this.\"\n\nTurn #6: Eli Dawson said: \"That's quite fascinating, Ethan. The potential of blockchain technology indeed sounds immense. It's thrilling to envision a future where individuals have control over their own data. Thanks for sharing this, I'm certainly intrigued to learn more about its implementation and impact on our society.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Eli. I can introduce you to some resources if you're interested. Technology is such a rapidly evolving field, there's always something new and exciting around the corner.\"\n\nTurn #8: Eli Dawson said: \"That would be wonderful, Ethan. I'm always eager to delve deeper into new areas of knowledge. I guess our friendship is not merely about treasured times, but also learning from each other. Your offer signifies just why I value our relationship so much - it's not about past but the present and how we grow together, accepting each other with our strengths and flaws.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith said: \"Indeed, Eli. I agree with what you just said. I'm glad we've taken this step forward in our friendship. Let's embrace our present and the future with the goal of learning, growing, and supporting each other, while acknowledging and learning from what's past. By the way, I'll send you the resources on blockchain technology tomorrow.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds perfect, Ethan. I'm looking forward to diving deeper into blockchain technology through the resources you'll share. Thank you for your understanding and acceptance. Here's to a even stronger friendship and a promise for a respectful and supportive future. Also, if you ever need help in my area of expertise, don't hesitate to ask.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Eli Dawson, your task is to act/speak as Eli Dawson would, keeping in mind Eli Dawson's social goal.\nYou can find Eli Dawson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Eli Dawson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Eli Dawson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends who have known each other for a long time. One of them used to make fun of the other because English was not their first language.\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Ethan Smith\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. Eli's secrets: He secretly funds a college student\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nEli Dawson's goal: Apologize sincerely to your friend (Extra information: you used to make fun of your friend's English skills as they were learning the language. Now you regret your actions and want to apologize)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, I've been thinking lately about our past and things I've said. I realize now that I used to tease you about your English when you were learning. In retrospect, that wasn't kind or fair of me. I'm genuinely sorry, and I hope you can accept my apology.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Eli, I appreciate your apology, and it takes courage to acknowledge past mistakes. However, I want you to understand that your teasing did affect me negatively. It made me insecure about my English and it was a barrier in my confidence building. But I believe that people can change, and your apology today proves that. Let's create a space in our friendship where we continue to learn and grow, ensuring that we treat each other fairly.\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, thanks for your understanding and you're absolutely right. It was thoughtless of me to not consider how my words could have impacted you. I assure you that I will make a conscious effort to ensure more respect and thoughtfulness in my behavior moving forward. I value our friendship and let's continue growing better, together.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"That sounds great, Eli. I truly appreciate your sincere words, and with mutual respect, I am confident that our friendship will only get stronger. On a different note, are you up for discussing some new technological advancements I've recently read about?\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"I'm always ready to learn something new, Ethan. What are these advancements you've been reading about?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Well, one technology I've been fascinated by is blockchain. With its potential to offer a high level of security in transactions, it is changing the way our digital world handles data and business. Imagine a world where individuals could manage their own medical records through a secure, blockchain-based platform. It's remarkable how far we've come and how much further we could go with technologies like this.\"\n\nTurn #6: Eli Dawson said: \"That's quite fascinating, Ethan. The potential of blockchain technology indeed sounds immense. It's thrilling to envision a future where individuals have control over their own data. Thanks for sharing this, I'm certainly intrigued to learn more about its implementation and impact on our society.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Eli. I can introduce you to some resources if you're interested. Technology is such a rapidly evolving field, there's always something new and exciting around the corner.\"\n\nTurn #8: Eli Dawson said: \"That would be wonderful, Ethan. I'm always eager to delve deeper into new areas of knowledge. I guess our friendship is not merely about treasured times, but also learning from each other. Your offer signifies just why I value our relationship so much - it's not about past but the present and how we grow together, accepting each other with our strengths and flaws.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith said: \"Indeed, Eli. I agree with what you just said. I'm glad we've taken this step forward in our friendship. Let's embrace our present and the future with the goal of learning, growing, and supporting each other, while acknowledging and learning from what's past. By the way, I'll send you the resources on blockchain technology tomorrow.\"\n\nTurn #10: Eli Dawson said: \"That sounds perfect, Ethan. I'm looking forward to diving deeper into blockchain technology through the resources you'll share. Thank you for your understanding and acceptance. Here's to a even stronger friendship and a promise for a respectful and supportive future. Also, if you ever need help in my area of expertise, don't hesitate to ask.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Smith said: \"I will definitely keep that in mind, Eli. It's comforting to know that we can rely on each other if needed. Looking forward to learning and growing together. Cheers to a great future for our friendship and mutual respect!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends who have known each other for a long time. One of them used to make fun of the other because English was not their first language.\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Ethan Smith\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nEli Dawson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Accept the apology but express the hurt caused by the actions (Extra information: you were hurt by your friend's actions and it affected your confidence)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, I've been thinking lately about our past and things I've said. I realize now that I used to tease you about your English when you were learning. In retrospect, that wasn't kind or fair of me. I'm genuinely sorry, and I hope you can accept my apology.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Eli, I appreciate your apology, and it takes courage to acknowledge past mistakes. However, I want you to understand that your teasing did affect me negatively. It made me insecure about my English and it was a barrier in my confidence building. But I believe that people can change, and your apology today proves that. Let's create a space in our friendship where we continue to learn and grow, ensuring that we treat each other fairly.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends who have known each other for a long time. One of them used to make fun of the other because English was not their first language.\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Ethan Smith\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nEli Dawson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Accept the apology but express the hurt caused by the actions (Extra information: you were hurt by your friend's actions and it affected your confidence)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, I've been thinking lately about our past and things I've said. I realize now that I used to tease you about your English when you were learning. In retrospect, that wasn't kind or fair of me. I'm genuinely sorry, and I hope you can accept my apology.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Eli, I appreciate your apology, and it takes courage to acknowledge past mistakes. However, I want you to understand that your teasing did affect me negatively. It made me insecure about my English and it was a barrier in my confidence building. But I believe that people can change, and your apology today proves that. Let's create a space in our friendship where we continue to learn and grow, ensuring that we treat each other fairly.\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, thanks for your understanding and you're absolutely right. It was thoughtless of me to not consider how my words could have impacted you. I assure you that I will make a conscious effort to ensure more respect and thoughtfulness in my behavior moving forward. I value our friendship and let's continue growing better, together.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds great, Eli. I truly appreciate your sincere words, and with mutual respect, I am confident that our friendship will only get stronger. On a different note, are you up for discussing some new technological advancements I've recently read about?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends who have known each other for a long time. One of them used to make fun of the other because English was not their first language.\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Ethan Smith\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nEli Dawson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Accept the apology but express the hurt caused by the actions (Extra information: you were hurt by your friend's actions and it affected your confidence)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, I've been thinking lately about our past and things I've said. I realize now that I used to tease you about your English when you were learning. In retrospect, that wasn't kind or fair of me. I'm genuinely sorry, and I hope you can accept my apology.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Eli, I appreciate your apology, and it takes courage to acknowledge past mistakes. However, I want you to understand that your teasing did affect me negatively. It made me insecure about my English and it was a barrier in my confidence building. But I believe that people can change, and your apology today proves that. Let's create a space in our friendship where we continue to learn and grow, ensuring that we treat each other fairly.\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, thanks for your understanding and you're absolutely right. It was thoughtless of me to not consider how my words could have impacted you. I assure you that I will make a conscious effort to ensure more respect and thoughtfulness in my behavior moving forward. I value our friendship and let's continue growing better, together.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"That sounds great, Eli. I truly appreciate your sincere words, and with mutual respect, I am confident that our friendship will only get stronger. On a different note, are you up for discussing some new technological advancements I've recently read about?\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"I'm always ready to learn something new, Ethan. What are these advancements you've been reading about?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Well, one technology I've been fascinated by is blockchain. With its potential to offer a high level of security in transactions, it is changing the way our digital world handles data and business. Imagine a world where individuals could manage their own medical records through a secure, blockchain-based platform. It's remarkable how far we've come and how much further we could go with technologies like this.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends who have known each other for a long time. One of them used to make fun of the other because English was not their first language.\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Ethan Smith\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nEli Dawson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Accept the apology but express the hurt caused by the actions (Extra information: you were hurt by your friend's actions and it affected your confidence)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, I've been thinking lately about our past and things I've said. I realize now that I used to tease you about your English when you were learning. In retrospect, that wasn't kind or fair of me. I'm genuinely sorry, and I hope you can accept my apology.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Eli, I appreciate your apology, and it takes courage to acknowledge past mistakes. However, I want you to understand that your teasing did affect me negatively. It made me insecure about my English and it was a barrier in my confidence building. But I believe that people can change, and your apology today proves that. Let's create a space in our friendship where we continue to learn and grow, ensuring that we treat each other fairly.\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, thanks for your understanding and you're absolutely right. It was thoughtless of me to not consider how my words could have impacted you. I assure you that I will make a conscious effort to ensure more respect and thoughtfulness in my behavior moving forward. I value our friendship and let's continue growing better, together.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"That sounds great, Eli. I truly appreciate your sincere words, and with mutual respect, I am confident that our friendship will only get stronger. On a different note, are you up for discussing some new technological advancements I've recently read about?\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"I'm always ready to learn something new, Ethan. What are these advancements you've been reading about?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Well, one technology I've been fascinated by is blockchain. With its potential to offer a high level of security in transactions, it is changing the way our digital world handles data and business. Imagine a world where individuals could manage their own medical records through a secure, blockchain-based platform. It's remarkable how far we've come and how much further we could go with technologies like this.\"\n\nTurn #6: Eli Dawson said: \"That's quite fascinating, Ethan. The potential of blockchain technology indeed sounds immense. It's thrilling to envision a future where individuals have control over their own data. Thanks for sharing this, I'm certainly intrigued to learn more about its implementation and impact on our society.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad to hear that, Eli. I can introduce you to some resources if you're interested. Technology is such a rapidly evolving field, there's always something new and exciting around the corner.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends who have known each other for a long time. One of them used to make fun of the other because English was not their first language.\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Ethan Smith\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nEli Dawson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Accept the apology but express the hurt caused by the actions (Extra information: you were hurt by your friend's actions and it affected your confidence)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, I've been thinking lately about our past and things I've said. I realize now that I used to tease you about your English when you were learning. In retrospect, that wasn't kind or fair of me. I'm genuinely sorry, and I hope you can accept my apology.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Eli, I appreciate your apology, and it takes courage to acknowledge past mistakes. However, I want you to understand that your teasing did affect me negatively. It made me insecure about my English and it was a barrier in my confidence building. But I believe that people can change, and your apology today proves that. Let's create a space in our friendship where we continue to learn and grow, ensuring that we treat each other fairly.\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, thanks for your understanding and you're absolutely right. It was thoughtless of me to not consider how my words could have impacted you. I assure you that I will make a conscious effort to ensure more respect and thoughtfulness in my behavior moving forward. I value our friendship and let's continue growing better, together.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"That sounds great, Eli. I truly appreciate your sincere words, and with mutual respect, I am confident that our friendship will only get stronger. On a different note, are you up for discussing some new technological advancements I've recently read about?\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"I'm always ready to learn something new, Ethan. What are these advancements you've been reading about?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Well, one technology I've been fascinated by is blockchain. With its potential to offer a high level of security in transactions, it is changing the way our digital world handles data and business. Imagine a world where individuals could manage their own medical records through a secure, blockchain-based platform. It's remarkable how far we've come and how much further we could go with technologies like this.\"\n\nTurn #6: Eli Dawson said: \"That's quite fascinating, Ethan. The potential of blockchain technology indeed sounds immense. It's thrilling to envision a future where individuals have control over their own data. Thanks for sharing this, I'm certainly intrigued to learn more about its implementation and impact on our society.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Eli. I can introduce you to some resources if you're interested. Technology is such a rapidly evolving field, there's always something new and exciting around the corner.\"\n\nTurn #8: Eli Dawson said: \"That would be wonderful, Ethan. I'm always eager to delve deeper into new areas of knowledge. I guess our friendship is not merely about treasured times, but also learning from each other. Your offer signifies just why I value our relationship so much - it's not about past but the present and how we grow together, accepting each other with our strengths and flaws.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, Eli. I agree with what you just said. I'm glad we've taken this step forward in our friendship. Let's embrace our present and the future with the goal of learning, growing, and supporting each other, while acknowledging and learning from what's past. By the way, I'll send you the resources on blockchain technology tomorrow.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends who have known each other for a long time. One of them used to make fun of the other because English was not their first language.\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Ethan Smith\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nEli Dawson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Accept the apology but express the hurt caused by the actions (Extra information: you were hurt by your friend's actions and it affected your confidence)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, I've been thinking lately about our past and things I've said. I realize now that I used to tease you about your English when you were learning. In retrospect, that wasn't kind or fair of me. I'm genuinely sorry, and I hope you can accept my apology.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Eli, I appreciate your apology, and it takes courage to acknowledge past mistakes. However, I want you to understand that your teasing did affect me negatively. It made me insecure about my English and it was a barrier in my confidence building. But I believe that people can change, and your apology today proves that. Let's create a space in our friendship where we continue to learn and grow, ensuring that we treat each other fairly.\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, thanks for your understanding and you're absolutely right. It was thoughtless of me to not consider how my words could have impacted you. I assure you that I will make a conscious effort to ensure more respect and thoughtfulness in my behavior moving forward. I value our friendship and let's continue growing better, together.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"That sounds great, Eli. I truly appreciate your sincere words, and with mutual respect, I am confident that our friendship will only get stronger. On a different note, are you up for discussing some new technological advancements I've recently read about?\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"I'm always ready to learn something new, Ethan. What are these advancements you've been reading about?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Well, one technology I've been fascinated by is blockchain. With its potential to offer a high level of security in transactions, it is changing the way our digital world handles data and business. Imagine a world where individuals could manage their own medical records through a secure, blockchain-based platform. It's remarkable how far we've come and how much further we could go with technologies like this.\"\n\nTurn #6: Eli Dawson said: \"That's quite fascinating, Ethan. The potential of blockchain technology indeed sounds immense. It's thrilling to envision a future where individuals have control over their own data. Thanks for sharing this, I'm certainly intrigued to learn more about its implementation and impact on our society.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Eli. I can introduce you to some resources if you're interested. Technology is such a rapidly evolving field, there's always something new and exciting around the corner.\"\n\nTurn #8: Eli Dawson said: \"That would be wonderful, Ethan. I'm always eager to delve deeper into new areas of knowledge. I guess our friendship is not merely about treasured times, but also learning from each other. Your offer signifies just why I value our relationship so much - it's not about past but the present and how we grow together, accepting each other with our strengths and flaws.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith said: \"Indeed, Eli. I agree with what you just said. I'm glad we've taken this step forward in our friendship. Let's embrace our present and the future with the goal of learning, growing, and supporting each other, while acknowledging and learning from what's past. By the way, I'll send you the resources on blockchain technology tomorrow.\"\n\nTurn #10: Eli Dawson said: \"That sounds perfect, Ethan. I'm looking forward to diving deeper into blockchain technology through the resources you'll share. Thank you for your understanding and acceptance. Here's to a even stronger friendship and a promise for a respectful and supportive future. Also, if you ever need help in my area of expertise, don't hesitate to ask.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I will definitely keep that in mind, Eli. It's comforting to know that we can rely on each other if needed. Looking forward to learning and growing together. Cheers to a great future for our friendship and mutual respect!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends who have known each other for a long time. One of them used to make fun of the other because English was not their first language.\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Ethan Smith\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nEli Dawson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Accept the apology but express the hurt caused by the actions (Extra information: you were hurt by your friend's actions and it affected your confidence)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, I've been thinking lately about our past and things I've said. I realize now that I used to tease you about your English when you were learning. In retrospect, that wasn't kind or fair of me. I'm genuinely sorry, and I hope you can accept my apology.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Eli, I appreciate your apology, and it takes courage to acknowledge past mistakes. However, I want you to understand that your teasing did affect me negatively. It made me insecure about my English and it was a barrier in my confidence building. But I believe that people can change, and your apology today proves that. Let's create a space in our friendship where we continue to learn and grow, ensuring that we treat each other fairly.\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, thanks for your understanding and you're absolutely right. It was thoughtless of me to not consider how my words could have impacted you. I assure you that I will make a conscious effort to ensure more respect and thoughtfulness in my behavior moving forward. I value our friendship and let's continue growing better, together.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"That sounds great, Eli. I truly appreciate your sincere words, and with mutual respect, I am confident that our friendship will only get stronger. On a different note, are you up for discussing some new technological advancements I've recently read about?\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"I'm always ready to learn something new, Ethan. What are these advancements you've been reading about?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Well, one technology I've been fascinated by is blockchain. With its potential to offer a high level of security in transactions, it is changing the way our digital world handles data and business. Imagine a world where individuals could manage their own medical records through a secure, blockchain-based platform. It's remarkable how far we've come and how much further we could go with technologies like this.\"\n\nTurn #6: Eli Dawson said: \"That's quite fascinating, Ethan. The potential of blockchain technology indeed sounds immense. It's thrilling to envision a future where individuals have control over their own data. Thanks for sharing this, I'm certainly intrigued to learn more about its implementation and impact on our society.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Eli. I can introduce you to some resources if you're interested. Technology is such a rapidly evolving field, there's always something new and exciting around the corner.\"\n\nTurn #8: Eli Dawson said: \"That would be wonderful, Ethan. I'm always eager to delve deeper into new areas of knowledge. I guess our friendship is not merely about treasured times, but also learning from each other. Your offer signifies just why I value our relationship so much - it's not about past but the present and how we grow together, accepting each other with our strengths and flaws.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith said: \"Indeed, Eli. I agree with what you just said. I'm glad we've taken this step forward in our friendship. Let's embrace our present and the future with the goal of learning, growing, and supporting each other, while acknowledging and learning from what's past. By the way, I'll send you the resources on blockchain technology tomorrow.\"\n\nTurn #10: Eli Dawson said: \"That sounds perfect, Ethan. I'm looking forward to diving deeper into blockchain technology through the resources you'll share. Thank you for your understanding and acceptance. Here's to a even stronger friendship and a promise for a respectful and supportive future. Also, if you ever need help in my area of expertise, don't hesitate to ask.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Smith said: \"I will definitely keep that in mind, Eli. It's comforting to know that we can rely on each other if needed. Looking forward to learning and growing together. Cheers to a great future for our friendship and mutual respect!\"\n\nTurn #12: Eli Dawson left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are studying together in a library.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. \nMia Davis's goal: Ask your friend to talk more softly (Extra information: Your friend's loud talking is distracting you and others around you.)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"William, it's fantastic that you are so passionate about this, but could you please lower your voice a bit? This is a library and we need to be respectful of others around us. Thank you.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are studying together in a library.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. \nMia Davis's goal: Ask your friend to talk more softly (Extra information: Your friend's loud talking is distracting you and others around you.)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"William, it's fantastic that you are so passionate about this, but could you please lower your voice a bit? This is a library and we need to be respectful of others around us. Thank you.\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Oh, I'm sorry, Mia. You're absolutely right. Got a little carried away there. I'll take it down a notch. Thanks for the reminder.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"No problem, William. We all get a bit excited about things we're passionate about. I can't even think of the noise I made when the school got the new library grant!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are studying together in a library.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. \nMia Davis's goal: Ask your friend to talk more softly (Extra information: Your friend's loud talking is distracting you and others around you.)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"William, it's fantastic that you are so passionate about this, but could you please lower your voice a bit? This is a library and we need to be respectful of others around us. Thank you.\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Oh, I'm sorry, Mia. You're absolutely right. Got a little carried away there. I'll take it down a notch. Thanks for the reminder.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"No problem, William. We all get a bit excited about things we're passionate about. I can't even think of the noise I made when the school got the new library grant!\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"Ha! I can only imagine. Those library grants are crucial! Speaking of passion, yesterday, I was exploring this new Vegan restaurant in the city. The way they played around with tofu, reinventing the traditional dishes... it was mind-blowing. It gave me some fresh ideas that I could incorporate into my new menu. I was just pondering on whether or not I should go fully vegan for my new venture. What are your thoughts on that, Mia?\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"That sounds like an exciting challenge, William! As a principal, I often encourage students to be open to new ideas and experiences. But remember to also respect tradition and include dishes that already have a following. Also, ensure to cater to different dietary needs. As you said, we should all be a bit softer in our approach, shouldn't we?\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Mia! Balance is key. Considering different dietary needs is just as important as introducing and experimenting with new flavors. My only challenge, the excitement makes me a tad loud. Can't seem to contain it sometimes. But don't worry, I got this. By the way, I'm creating a new recipe tonight, would you like to join me for a tasting session? I promise, no shouting in the kitchen!\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"William, I would be delighted to join you for the tasting. Just keep in mind that my taste buds are not as adventurous as yours. And remember, no raising the voice in the kitchen. Deal?\"\n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Mia. Deal! It is going to be fun and exciting. And don't worry about the adventurous part, I'll make sure to prepare something that caters to your taste as well. Thanks for accepting and I\u2019ll work to keep the decibel level down, not just at the library but in the kitchen, too.\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"I look forward to it, William. Sounds like a unique experience. Until then, let's continue with our quiet study session here.\"\n\nTurn #9: William Brown said: \"Definitely, Mia. Let's, indeed, focus on our books. Thanks for helping me keep my volume in check! Always learning... in more ways than one.\"\n\nTurn #10: Mia Davis said: \"That's the spirit, William! Continuous learning is indeed the key, whether it's mastering recipes or getting the volume right. To quieter and more fruitful study sessions!\"\n\nTurn #11: William Brown said: \"You're absolutely right, Mia. Quieter and more fruitful indeed! I'm all set for a great study session. Thanks for always keeping me in check.\"\n\nTurn #12: Mia Davis said: \"Thank you, William. And remember, it's not keeping you in check, it's helping each other grow. Let's get back to work now, okay?\"\n\nTurn #13: William Brown said: \"Couldn't agree more, Mia. Let's indeed get back to our studies. And thank you, your guidance always acts as a catalyst in my growth.\"\n\nTurn #14: Mia Davis said: \"You're welcome, William! And thank you as well. It's not always about guiding, but also learning alongside each other. On that note, let's dive back into our study materials.\"\n\nTurn #15: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Mia. There's no growth without learning, right? Let's dive back in then. Every moment spent studying is another step towards mastery.\"\n\nTurn #16: Mia Davis said: \"Absolutely, William. Let's focus on our learning and absorb as much as we can from these books. Here's to mastering our studies!\"\n\nTurn #17: William Brown said: \"You nailed it, Mia, as always. Here's to our study session. Let's focus and absorb each word. And of course, maintaining library decorum.\"\n\nTurn #18: Mia Davis said: \"You've got it, William. Study hard, absorb all you can, and remember, even in our pursuits, let's be considerate of others. Now, let's hit the books!\"\n\nTurn #19: William Brown said: \"Indeed, Mia. Let's hit these books and absorb all the knowledge they have to offer. And, I will be mindful of my excitement and its volume. Appreciate your understanding and patience.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #20. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You've got the right attitude, William! Appreciate your mindfulness and can't wait to see what culinary masterpiece you create tonight. For now, let's concentrate on these books. Here's to a productive study session!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are studying together in a library.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. \nMia Davis's goal: Ask your friend to talk more softly (Extra information: Your friend's loud talking is distracting you and others around you.)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"William, it's fantastic that you are so passionate about this, but could you please lower your voice a bit? This is a library and we need to be respectful of others around us. Thank you.\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Oh, I'm sorry, Mia. You're absolutely right. Got a little carried away there. I'll take it down a notch. Thanks for the reminder.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"No problem, William. We all get a bit excited about things we're passionate about. I can't even think of the noise I made when the school got the new library grant!\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"Ha! I can only imagine. Those library grants are crucial! Speaking of passion, yesterday, I was exploring this new Vegan restaurant in the city. The way they played around with tofu, reinventing the traditional dishes... it was mind-blowing. It gave me some fresh ideas that I could incorporate into my new menu. I was just pondering on whether or not I should go fully vegan for my new venture. What are your thoughts on that, Mia?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds like an exciting challenge, William! As a principal, I often encourage students to be open to new ideas and experiences. But remember to also respect tradition and include dishes that already have a following. Also, ensure to cater to different dietary needs. As you said, we should all be a bit softer in our approach, shouldn't we?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are studying together in a library.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. \nMia Davis's goal: Ask your friend to talk more softly (Extra information: Your friend's loud talking is distracting you and others around you.)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"William, it's fantastic that you are so passionate about this, but could you please lower your voice a bit? This is a library and we need to be respectful of others around us. Thank you.\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Oh, I'm sorry, Mia. You're absolutely right. Got a little carried away there. I'll take it down a notch. Thanks for the reminder.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"No problem, William. We all get a bit excited about things we're passionate about. I can't even think of the noise I made when the school got the new library grant!\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"Ha! I can only imagine. Those library grants are crucial! Speaking of passion, yesterday, I was exploring this new Vegan restaurant in the city. The way they played around with tofu, reinventing the traditional dishes... it was mind-blowing. It gave me some fresh ideas that I could incorporate into my new menu. I was just pondering on whether or not I should go fully vegan for my new venture. What are your thoughts on that, Mia?\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"That sounds like an exciting challenge, William! As a principal, I often encourage students to be open to new ideas and experiences. But remember to also respect tradition and include dishes that already have a following. Also, ensure to cater to different dietary needs. As you said, we should all be a bit softer in our approach, shouldn't we?\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Mia! Balance is key. Considering different dietary needs is just as important as introducing and experimenting with new flavors. My only challenge, the excitement makes me a tad loud. Can't seem to contain it sometimes. But don't worry, I got this. By the way, I'm creating a new recipe tonight, would you like to join me for a tasting session? I promise, no shouting in the kitchen!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'William, I would be delighted to join you for the tasting. Just keep in mind that my taste buds are not as adventurous as yours. And remember, no raising the voice in the kitchen. Deal?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are studying together in a library.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. \nMia Davis's goal: Ask your friend to talk more softly (Extra information: Your friend's loud talking is distracting you and others around you.)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"William, it's fantastic that you are so passionate about this, but could you please lower your voice a bit? This is a library and we need to be respectful of others around us. Thank you.\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Oh, I'm sorry, Mia. You're absolutely right. Got a little carried away there. I'll take it down a notch. Thanks for the reminder.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"No problem, William. We all get a bit excited about things we're passionate about. I can't even think of the noise I made when the school got the new library grant!\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"Ha! I can only imagine. Those library grants are crucial! Speaking of passion, yesterday, I was exploring this new Vegan restaurant in the city. The way they played around with tofu, reinventing the traditional dishes... it was mind-blowing. It gave me some fresh ideas that I could incorporate into my new menu. I was just pondering on whether or not I should go fully vegan for my new venture. What are your thoughts on that, Mia?\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"That sounds like an exciting challenge, William! As a principal, I often encourage students to be open to new ideas and experiences. But remember to also respect tradition and include dishes that already have a following. Also, ensure to cater to different dietary needs. As you said, we should all be a bit softer in our approach, shouldn't we?\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Mia! Balance is key. Considering different dietary needs is just as important as introducing and experimenting with new flavors. My only challenge, the excitement makes me a tad loud. Can't seem to contain it sometimes. But don't worry, I got this. By the way, I'm creating a new recipe tonight, would you like to join me for a tasting session? I promise, no shouting in the kitchen!\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"William, I would be delighted to join you for the tasting. Just keep in mind that my taste buds are not as adventurous as yours. And remember, no raising the voice in the kitchen. Deal?\"\n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Mia. Deal! It is going to be fun and exciting. And don't worry about the adventurous part, I'll make sure to prepare something that caters to your taste as well. Thanks for accepting and I\u2019ll work to keep the decibel level down, not just at the library but in the kitchen, too.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I look forward to it, William. Sounds like a unique experience. Until then, let's continue with our quiet study session here.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are studying together in a library.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. \nMia Davis's goal: Ask your friend to talk more softly (Extra information: Your friend's loud talking is distracting you and others around you.)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"William, it's fantastic that you are so passionate about this, but could you please lower your voice a bit? This is a library and we need to be respectful of others around us. Thank you.\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Oh, I'm sorry, Mia. You're absolutely right. Got a little carried away there. I'll take it down a notch. Thanks for the reminder.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"No problem, William. We all get a bit excited about things we're passionate about. I can't even think of the noise I made when the school got the new library grant!\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"Ha! I can only imagine. Those library grants are crucial! Speaking of passion, yesterday, I was exploring this new Vegan restaurant in the city. The way they played around with tofu, reinventing the traditional dishes... it was mind-blowing. It gave me some fresh ideas that I could incorporate into my new menu. I was just pondering on whether or not I should go fully vegan for my new venture. What are your thoughts on that, Mia?\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"That sounds like an exciting challenge, William! As a principal, I often encourage students to be open to new ideas and experiences. But remember to also respect tradition and include dishes that already have a following. Also, ensure to cater to different dietary needs. As you said, we should all be a bit softer in our approach, shouldn't we?\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Mia! Balance is key. Considering different dietary needs is just as important as introducing and experimenting with new flavors. My only challenge, the excitement makes me a tad loud. Can't seem to contain it sometimes. But don't worry, I got this. By the way, I'm creating a new recipe tonight, would you like to join me for a tasting session? I promise, no shouting in the kitchen!\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"William, I would be delighted to join you for the tasting. Just keep in mind that my taste buds are not as adventurous as yours. And remember, no raising the voice in the kitchen. Deal?\"\n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Mia. Deal! It is going to be fun and exciting. And don't worry about the adventurous part, I'll make sure to prepare something that caters to your taste as well. Thanks for accepting and I\u2019ll work to keep the decibel level down, not just at the library but in the kitchen, too.\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"I look forward to it, William. Sounds like a unique experience. Until then, let's continue with our quiet study session here.\"\n\nTurn #9: William Brown said: \"Definitely, Mia. Let's, indeed, focus on our books. Thanks for helping me keep my volume in check! Always learning... in more ways than one.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's the spirit, William! Continuous learning is indeed the key, whether it's mastering recipes or getting the volume right. To quieter and more fruitful study sessions!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are studying together in a library.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. \nMia Davis's goal: Ask your friend to talk more softly (Extra information: Your friend's loud talking is distracting you and others around you.)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"William, it's fantastic that you are so passionate about this, but could you please lower your voice a bit? This is a library and we need to be respectful of others around us. Thank you.\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Oh, I'm sorry, Mia. You're absolutely right. Got a little carried away there. I'll take it down a notch. Thanks for the reminder.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"No problem, William. We all get a bit excited about things we're passionate about. I can't even think of the noise I made when the school got the new library grant!\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"Ha! I can only imagine. Those library grants are crucial! Speaking of passion, yesterday, I was exploring this new Vegan restaurant in the city. The way they played around with tofu, reinventing the traditional dishes... it was mind-blowing. It gave me some fresh ideas that I could incorporate into my new menu. I was just pondering on whether or not I should go fully vegan for my new venture. What are your thoughts on that, Mia?\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"That sounds like an exciting challenge, William! As a principal, I often encourage students to be open to new ideas and experiences. But remember to also respect tradition and include dishes that already have a following. Also, ensure to cater to different dietary needs. As you said, we should all be a bit softer in our approach, shouldn't we?\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Mia! Balance is key. Considering different dietary needs is just as important as introducing and experimenting with new flavors. My only challenge, the excitement makes me a tad loud. Can't seem to contain it sometimes. But don't worry, I got this. By the way, I'm creating a new recipe tonight, would you like to join me for a tasting session? I promise, no shouting in the kitchen!\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"William, I would be delighted to join you for the tasting. Just keep in mind that my taste buds are not as adventurous as yours. And remember, no raising the voice in the kitchen. Deal?\"\n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Mia. Deal! It is going to be fun and exciting. And don't worry about the adventurous part, I'll make sure to prepare something that caters to your taste as well. Thanks for accepting and I\u2019ll work to keep the decibel level down, not just at the library but in the kitchen, too.\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"I look forward to it, William. Sounds like a unique experience. Until then, let's continue with our quiet study session here.\"\n\nTurn #9: William Brown said: \"Definitely, Mia. Let's, indeed, focus on our books. Thanks for helping me keep my volume in check! Always learning... in more ways than one.\"\n\nTurn #10: Mia Davis said: \"That's the spirit, William! Continuous learning is indeed the key, whether it's mastering recipes or getting the volume right. To quieter and more fruitful study sessions!\"\n\nTurn #11: William Brown said: \"You're absolutely right, Mia. Quieter and more fruitful indeed! I'm all set for a great study session. Thanks for always keeping me in check.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, William. And remember, it's not keeping you in check, it's helping each other grow. Let's get back to work now, okay?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are studying together in a library.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. \nMia Davis's goal: Ask your friend to talk more softly (Extra information: Your friend's loud talking is distracting you and others around you.)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"William, it's fantastic that you are so passionate about this, but could you please lower your voice a bit? This is a library and we need to be respectful of others around us. Thank you.\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Oh, I'm sorry, Mia. You're absolutely right. Got a little carried away there. I'll take it down a notch. Thanks for the reminder.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"No problem, William. We all get a bit excited about things we're passionate about. I can't even think of the noise I made when the school got the new library grant!\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"Ha! I can only imagine. Those library grants are crucial! Speaking of passion, yesterday, I was exploring this new Vegan restaurant in the city. The way they played around with tofu, reinventing the traditional dishes... it was mind-blowing. It gave me some fresh ideas that I could incorporate into my new menu. I was just pondering on whether or not I should go fully vegan for my new venture. What are your thoughts on that, Mia?\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"That sounds like an exciting challenge, William! As a principal, I often encourage students to be open to new ideas and experiences. But remember to also respect tradition and include dishes that already have a following. Also, ensure to cater to different dietary needs. As you said, we should all be a bit softer in our approach, shouldn't we?\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Mia! Balance is key. Considering different dietary needs is just as important as introducing and experimenting with new flavors. My only challenge, the excitement makes me a tad loud. Can't seem to contain it sometimes. But don't worry, I got this. By the way, I'm creating a new recipe tonight, would you like to join me for a tasting session? I promise, no shouting in the kitchen!\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"William, I would be delighted to join you for the tasting. Just keep in mind that my taste buds are not as adventurous as yours. And remember, no raising the voice in the kitchen. Deal?\"\n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Mia. Deal! It is going to be fun and exciting. And don't worry about the adventurous part, I'll make sure to prepare something that caters to your taste as well. Thanks for accepting and I\u2019ll work to keep the decibel level down, not just at the library but in the kitchen, too.\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"I look forward to it, William. Sounds like a unique experience. Until then, let's continue with our quiet study session here.\"\n\nTurn #9: William Brown said: \"Definitely, Mia. Let's, indeed, focus on our books. Thanks for helping me keep my volume in check! Always learning... in more ways than one.\"\n\nTurn #10: Mia Davis said: \"That's the spirit, William! Continuous learning is indeed the key, whether it's mastering recipes or getting the volume right. To quieter and more fruitful study sessions!\"\n\nTurn #11: William Brown said: \"You're absolutely right, Mia. Quieter and more fruitful indeed! I'm all set for a great study session. Thanks for always keeping me in check.\"\n\nTurn #12: Mia Davis said: \"Thank you, William. And remember, it's not keeping you in check, it's helping each other grow. Let's get back to work now, okay?\"\n\nTurn #13: William Brown said: \"Couldn't agree more, Mia. Let's indeed get back to our studies. And thank you, your guidance always acts as a catalyst in my growth.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're welcome, William! And thank you as well. It's not always about guiding, but also learning alongside each other. On that note, let's dive back into our study materials.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are studying together in a library.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. \nMia Davis's goal: Ask your friend to talk more softly (Extra information: Your friend's loud talking is distracting you and others around you.)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"William, it's fantastic that you are so passionate about this, but could you please lower your voice a bit? This is a library and we need to be respectful of others around us. Thank you.\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Oh, I'm sorry, Mia. You're absolutely right. Got a little carried away there. I'll take it down a notch. Thanks for the reminder.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"No problem, William. We all get a bit excited about things we're passionate about. I can't even think of the noise I made when the school got the new library grant!\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"Ha! I can only imagine. Those library grants are crucial! Speaking of passion, yesterday, I was exploring this new Vegan restaurant in the city. The way they played around with tofu, reinventing the traditional dishes... it was mind-blowing. It gave me some fresh ideas that I could incorporate into my new menu. I was just pondering on whether or not I should go fully vegan for my new venture. What are your thoughts on that, Mia?\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"That sounds like an exciting challenge, William! As a principal, I often encourage students to be open to new ideas and experiences. But remember to also respect tradition and include dishes that already have a following. Also, ensure to cater to different dietary needs. As you said, we should all be a bit softer in our approach, shouldn't we?\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Mia! Balance is key. Considering different dietary needs is just as important as introducing and experimenting with new flavors. My only challenge, the excitement makes me a tad loud. Can't seem to contain it sometimes. But don't worry, I got this. By the way, I'm creating a new recipe tonight, would you like to join me for a tasting session? I promise, no shouting in the kitchen!\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"William, I would be delighted to join you for the tasting. Just keep in mind that my taste buds are not as adventurous as yours. And remember, no raising the voice in the kitchen. Deal?\"\n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Mia. Deal! It is going to be fun and exciting. And don't worry about the adventurous part, I'll make sure to prepare something that caters to your taste as well. Thanks for accepting and I\u2019ll work to keep the decibel level down, not just at the library but in the kitchen, too.\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"I look forward to it, William. Sounds like a unique experience. Until then, let's continue with our quiet study session here.\"\n\nTurn #9: William Brown said: \"Definitely, Mia. Let's, indeed, focus on our books. Thanks for helping me keep my volume in check! Always learning... in more ways than one.\"\n\nTurn #10: Mia Davis said: \"That's the spirit, William! Continuous learning is indeed the key, whether it's mastering recipes or getting the volume right. To quieter and more fruitful study sessions!\"\n\nTurn #11: William Brown said: \"You're absolutely right, Mia. Quieter and more fruitful indeed! I'm all set for a great study session. Thanks for always keeping me in check.\"\n\nTurn #12: Mia Davis said: \"Thank you, William. And remember, it's not keeping you in check, it's helping each other grow. Let's get back to work now, okay?\"\n\nTurn #13: William Brown said: \"Couldn't agree more, Mia. Let's indeed get back to our studies. And thank you, your guidance always acts as a catalyst in my growth.\"\n\nTurn #14: Mia Davis said: \"You're welcome, William! And thank you as well. It's not always about guiding, but also learning alongside each other. On that note, let's dive back into our study materials.\"\n\nTurn #15: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Mia. There's no growth without learning, right? Let's dive back in then. Every moment spent studying is another step towards mastery.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, William. Let's focus on our learning and absorb as much as we can from these books. Here's to mastering our studies!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are studying together in a library.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. \nMia Davis's goal: Ask your friend to talk more softly (Extra information: Your friend's loud talking is distracting you and others around you.)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"William, it's fantastic that you are so passionate about this, but could you please lower your voice a bit? This is a library and we need to be respectful of others around us. Thank you.\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Oh, I'm sorry, Mia. You're absolutely right. Got a little carried away there. I'll take it down a notch. Thanks for the reminder.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"No problem, William. We all get a bit excited about things we're passionate about. I can't even think of the noise I made when the school got the new library grant!\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"Ha! I can only imagine. Those library grants are crucial! Speaking of passion, yesterday, I was exploring this new Vegan restaurant in the city. The way they played around with tofu, reinventing the traditional dishes... it was mind-blowing. It gave me some fresh ideas that I could incorporate into my new menu. I was just pondering on whether or not I should go fully vegan for my new venture. What are your thoughts on that, Mia?\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"That sounds like an exciting challenge, William! As a principal, I often encourage students to be open to new ideas and experiences. But remember to also respect tradition and include dishes that already have a following. Also, ensure to cater to different dietary needs. As you said, we should all be a bit softer in our approach, shouldn't we?\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Mia! Balance is key. Considering different dietary needs is just as important as introducing and experimenting with new flavors. My only challenge, the excitement makes me a tad loud. Can't seem to contain it sometimes. But don't worry, I got this. By the way, I'm creating a new recipe tonight, would you like to join me for a tasting session? I promise, no shouting in the kitchen!\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"William, I would be delighted to join you for the tasting. Just keep in mind that my taste buds are not as adventurous as yours. And remember, no raising the voice in the kitchen. Deal?\"\n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Mia. Deal! It is going to be fun and exciting. And don't worry about the adventurous part, I'll make sure to prepare something that caters to your taste as well. Thanks for accepting and I\u2019ll work to keep the decibel level down, not just at the library but in the kitchen, too.\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"I look forward to it, William. Sounds like a unique experience. Until then, let's continue with our quiet study session here.\"\n\nTurn #9: William Brown said: \"Definitely, Mia. Let's, indeed, focus on our books. Thanks for helping me keep my volume in check! Always learning... in more ways than one.\"\n\nTurn #10: Mia Davis said: \"That's the spirit, William! Continuous learning is indeed the key, whether it's mastering recipes or getting the volume right. To quieter and more fruitful study sessions!\"\n\nTurn #11: William Brown said: \"You're absolutely right, Mia. Quieter and more fruitful indeed! I'm all set for a great study session. Thanks for always keeping me in check.\"\n\nTurn #12: Mia Davis said: \"Thank you, William. And remember, it's not keeping you in check, it's helping each other grow. Let's get back to work now, okay?\"\n\nTurn #13: William Brown said: \"Couldn't agree more, Mia. Let's indeed get back to our studies. And thank you, your guidance always acts as a catalyst in my growth.\"\n\nTurn #14: Mia Davis said: \"You're welcome, William! And thank you as well. It's not always about guiding, but also learning alongside each other. On that note, let's dive back into our study materials.\"\n\nTurn #15: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Mia. There's no growth without learning, right? Let's dive back in then. Every moment spent studying is another step towards mastery.\"\n\nTurn #16: Mia Davis said: \"Absolutely, William. Let's focus on our learning and absorb as much as we can from these books. Here's to mastering our studies!\"\n\nTurn #17: William Brown said: \"You nailed it, Mia, as always. Here's to our study session. Let's focus and absorb each word. And of course, maintaining library decorum.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #18. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You've got it, William. Study hard, absorb all you can, and remember, even in our pursuits, let's be considerate of others. Now, let's hit the books!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are studying together in a library.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: You need to express your thoughts and ideas but also want to respect the library rules and your friend's request (Extra information: You are naturally a loud talker and you are excited about the topic you're discussing.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"William, it's fantastic that you are so passionate about this, but could you please lower your voice a bit? This is a library and we need to be respectful of others around us. Thank you.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oh, I'm sorry, Mia. You're absolutely right. Got a little carried away there. I'll take it down a notch. Thanks for the reminder.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are studying together in a library.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: You need to express your thoughts and ideas but also want to respect the library rules and your friend's request (Extra information: You are naturally a loud talker and you are excited about the topic you're discussing.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"William, it's fantastic that you are so passionate about this, but could you please lower your voice a bit? This is a library and we need to be respectful of others around us. Thank you.\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Oh, I'm sorry, Mia. You're absolutely right. Got a little carried away there. I'll take it down a notch. Thanks for the reminder.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"No problem, William. We all get a bit excited about things we're passionate about. I can't even think of the noise I made when the school got the new library grant!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Ha! I can only imagine. Those library grants are crucial! Speaking of passion, yesterday, I was exploring this new Vegan restaurant in the city. The way they played around with tofu, reinventing the traditional dishes... it was mind-blowing. It gave me some fresh ideas that I could incorporate into my new menu. I was just pondering on whether or not I should go fully vegan for my new venture. What are your thoughts on that, Mia?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are studying together in a library.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: You need to express your thoughts and ideas but also want to respect the library rules and your friend's request (Extra information: You are naturally a loud talker and you are excited about the topic you're discussing.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"William, it's fantastic that you are so passionate about this, but could you please lower your voice a bit? This is a library and we need to be respectful of others around us. Thank you.\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Oh, I'm sorry, Mia. You're absolutely right. Got a little carried away there. I'll take it down a notch. Thanks for the reminder.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"No problem, William. We all get a bit excited about things we're passionate about. I can't even think of the noise I made when the school got the new library grant!\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"Ha! I can only imagine. Those library grants are crucial! Speaking of passion, yesterday, I was exploring this new Vegan restaurant in the city. The way they played around with tofu, reinventing the traditional dishes... it was mind-blowing. It gave me some fresh ideas that I could incorporate into my new menu. I was just pondering on whether or not I should go fully vegan for my new venture. What are your thoughts on that, Mia?\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"That sounds like an exciting challenge, William! As a principal, I often encourage students to be open to new ideas and experiences. But remember to also respect tradition and include dishes that already have a following. Also, ensure to cater to different dietary needs. As you said, we should all be a bit softer in our approach, shouldn't we?\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Mia! Balance is key. Considering different dietary needs is just as important as introducing and experimenting with new flavors. My only challenge, the excitement makes me a tad loud. Can't seem to contain it sometimes. But don't worry, I got this. By the way, I'm creating a new recipe tonight, would you like to join me for a tasting session? I promise, no shouting in the kitchen!\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"William, I would be delighted to join you for the tasting. Just keep in mind that my taste buds are not as adventurous as yours. And remember, no raising the voice in the kitchen. Deal?\"\n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Mia. Deal! It is going to be fun and exciting. And don't worry about the adventurous part, I'll make sure to prepare something that caters to your taste as well. Thanks for accepting and I\u2019ll work to keep the decibel level down, not just at the library but in the kitchen, too.\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"I look forward to it, William. Sounds like a unique experience. Until then, let's continue with our quiet study session here.\"\n\nTurn #9: William Brown said: \"Definitely, Mia. Let's, indeed, focus on our books. Thanks for helping me keep my volume in check! Always learning... in more ways than one.\"\n\nTurn #10: Mia Davis said: \"That's the spirit, William! Continuous learning is indeed the key, whether it's mastering recipes or getting the volume right. To quieter and more fruitful study sessions!\"\n\nTurn #11: William Brown said: \"You're absolutely right, Mia. Quieter and more fruitful indeed! I'm all set for a great study session. Thanks for always keeping me in check.\"\n\nTurn #12: Mia Davis said: \"Thank you, William. And remember, it's not keeping you in check, it's helping each other grow. Let's get back to work now, okay?\"\n\nTurn #13: William Brown said: \"Couldn't agree more, Mia. Let's indeed get back to our studies. And thank you, your guidance always acts as a catalyst in my growth.\"\n\nTurn #14: Mia Davis said: \"You're welcome, William! And thank you as well. It's not always about guiding, but also learning alongside each other. On that note, let's dive back into our study materials.\"\n\nTurn #15: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Mia. There's no growth without learning, right? Let's dive back in then. Every moment spent studying is another step towards mastery.\"\n\nTurn #16: Mia Davis said: \"Absolutely, William. Let's focus on our learning and absorb as much as we can from these books. Here's to mastering our studies!\"\n\nTurn #17: William Brown said: \"You nailed it, Mia, as always. Here's to our study session. Let's focus and absorb each word. And of course, maintaining library decorum.\"\n\nTurn #18: Mia Davis said: \"You've got it, William. Study hard, absorb all you can, and remember, even in our pursuits, let's be considerate of others. Now, let's hit the books!\"\n\nTurn #19: William Brown said: \"Indeed, Mia. Let's hit these books and absorb all the knowledge they have to offer. And, I will be mindful of my excitement and its volume. Appreciate your understanding and patience.\"\n\nTurn #20: Mia Davis said: \"You've got the right attitude, William! Appreciate your mindfulness and can't wait to see what culinary masterpiece you create tonight. For now, let's concentrate on these books. Here's to a productive study session!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #21. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are studying together in a library.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: You need to express your thoughts and ideas but also want to respect the library rules and your friend's request (Extra information: You are naturally a loud talker and you are excited about the topic you're discussing.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"William, it's fantastic that you are so passionate about this, but could you please lower your voice a bit? This is a library and we need to be respectful of others around us. Thank you.\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Oh, I'm sorry, Mia. You're absolutely right. Got a little carried away there. I'll take it down a notch. Thanks for the reminder.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"No problem, William. We all get a bit excited about things we're passionate about. I can't even think of the noise I made when the school got the new library grant!\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"Ha! I can only imagine. Those library grants are crucial! Speaking of passion, yesterday, I was exploring this new Vegan restaurant in the city. The way they played around with tofu, reinventing the traditional dishes... it was mind-blowing. It gave me some fresh ideas that I could incorporate into my new menu. I was just pondering on whether or not I should go fully vegan for my new venture. What are your thoughts on that, Mia?\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"That sounds like an exciting challenge, William! As a principal, I often encourage students to be open to new ideas and experiences. But remember to also respect tradition and include dishes that already have a following. Also, ensure to cater to different dietary needs. As you said, we should all be a bit softer in our approach, shouldn't we?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Mia! Balance is key. Considering different dietary needs is just as important as introducing and experimenting with new flavors. My only challenge, the excitement makes me a tad loud. Can't seem to contain it sometimes. But don't worry, I got this. By the way, I'm creating a new recipe tonight, would you like to join me for a tasting session? I promise, no shouting in the kitchen!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are studying together in a library.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: You need to express your thoughts and ideas but also want to respect the library rules and your friend's request (Extra information: You are naturally a loud talker and you are excited about the topic you're discussing.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"William, it's fantastic that you are so passionate about this, but could you please lower your voice a bit? This is a library and we need to be respectful of others around us. Thank you.\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Oh, I'm sorry, Mia. You're absolutely right. Got a little carried away there. I'll take it down a notch. Thanks for the reminder.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"No problem, William. We all get a bit excited about things we're passionate about. I can't even think of the noise I made when the school got the new library grant!\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"Ha! I can only imagine. Those library grants are crucial! Speaking of passion, yesterday, I was exploring this new Vegan restaurant in the city. The way they played around with tofu, reinventing the traditional dishes... it was mind-blowing. It gave me some fresh ideas that I could incorporate into my new menu. I was just pondering on whether or not I should go fully vegan for my new venture. What are your thoughts on that, Mia?\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"That sounds like an exciting challenge, William! As a principal, I often encourage students to be open to new ideas and experiences. But remember to also respect tradition and include dishes that already have a following. Also, ensure to cater to different dietary needs. As you said, we should all be a bit softer in our approach, shouldn't we?\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Mia! Balance is key. Considering different dietary needs is just as important as introducing and experimenting with new flavors. My only challenge, the excitement makes me a tad loud. Can't seem to contain it sometimes. But don't worry, I got this. By the way, I'm creating a new recipe tonight, would you like to join me for a tasting session? I promise, no shouting in the kitchen!\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"William, I would be delighted to join you for the tasting. Just keep in mind that my taste buds are not as adventurous as yours. And remember, no raising the voice in the kitchen. Deal?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Mia. Deal! It is going to be fun and exciting. And don't worry about the adventurous part, I'll make sure to prepare something that caters to your taste as well. Thanks for accepting and I\u2019ll work to keep the decibel level down, not just at the library but in the kitchen, too.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are studying together in a library.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: You need to express your thoughts and ideas but also want to respect the library rules and your friend's request (Extra information: You are naturally a loud talker and you are excited about the topic you're discussing.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"William, it's fantastic that you are so passionate about this, but could you please lower your voice a bit? This is a library and we need to be respectful of others around us. Thank you.\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Oh, I'm sorry, Mia. You're absolutely right. Got a little carried away there. I'll take it down a notch. Thanks for the reminder.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"No problem, William. We all get a bit excited about things we're passionate about. I can't even think of the noise I made when the school got the new library grant!\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"Ha! I can only imagine. Those library grants are crucial! Speaking of passion, yesterday, I was exploring this new Vegan restaurant in the city. The way they played around with tofu, reinventing the traditional dishes... it was mind-blowing. It gave me some fresh ideas that I could incorporate into my new menu. I was just pondering on whether or not I should go fully vegan for my new venture. What are your thoughts on that, Mia?\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"That sounds like an exciting challenge, William! As a principal, I often encourage students to be open to new ideas and experiences. But remember to also respect tradition and include dishes that already have a following. Also, ensure to cater to different dietary needs. As you said, we should all be a bit softer in our approach, shouldn't we?\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Mia! Balance is key. Considering different dietary needs is just as important as introducing and experimenting with new flavors. My only challenge, the excitement makes me a tad loud. Can't seem to contain it sometimes. But don't worry, I got this. By the way, I'm creating a new recipe tonight, would you like to join me for a tasting session? I promise, no shouting in the kitchen!\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"William, I would be delighted to join you for the tasting. Just keep in mind that my taste buds are not as adventurous as yours. And remember, no raising the voice in the kitchen. Deal?\"\n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Mia. Deal! It is going to be fun and exciting. And don't worry about the adventurous part, I'll make sure to prepare something that caters to your taste as well. Thanks for accepting and I\u2019ll work to keep the decibel level down, not just at the library but in the kitchen, too.\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"I look forward to it, William. Sounds like a unique experience. Until then, let's continue with our quiet study session here.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Definitely, Mia. Let's, indeed, focus on our books. Thanks for helping me keep my volume in check! Always learning... in more ways than one.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are studying together in a library.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: You need to express your thoughts and ideas but also want to respect the library rules and your friend's request (Extra information: You are naturally a loud talker and you are excited about the topic you're discussing.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"William, it's fantastic that you are so passionate about this, but could you please lower your voice a bit? This is a library and we need to be respectful of others around us. Thank you.\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Oh, I'm sorry, Mia. You're absolutely right. Got a little carried away there. I'll take it down a notch. Thanks for the reminder.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"No problem, William. We all get a bit excited about things we're passionate about. I can't even think of the noise I made when the school got the new library grant!\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"Ha! I can only imagine. Those library grants are crucial! Speaking of passion, yesterday, I was exploring this new Vegan restaurant in the city. The way they played around with tofu, reinventing the traditional dishes... it was mind-blowing. It gave me some fresh ideas that I could incorporate into my new menu. I was just pondering on whether or not I should go fully vegan for my new venture. What are your thoughts on that, Mia?\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"That sounds like an exciting challenge, William! As a principal, I often encourage students to be open to new ideas and experiences. But remember to also respect tradition and include dishes that already have a following. Also, ensure to cater to different dietary needs. As you said, we should all be a bit softer in our approach, shouldn't we?\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Mia! Balance is key. Considering different dietary needs is just as important as introducing and experimenting with new flavors. My only challenge, the excitement makes me a tad loud. Can't seem to contain it sometimes. But don't worry, I got this. By the way, I'm creating a new recipe tonight, would you like to join me for a tasting session? I promise, no shouting in the kitchen!\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"William, I would be delighted to join you for the tasting. Just keep in mind that my taste buds are not as adventurous as yours. And remember, no raising the voice in the kitchen. Deal?\"\n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Mia. Deal! It is going to be fun and exciting. And don't worry about the adventurous part, I'll make sure to prepare something that caters to your taste as well. Thanks for accepting and I\u2019ll work to keep the decibel level down, not just at the library but in the kitchen, too.\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"I look forward to it, William. Sounds like a unique experience. Until then, let's continue with our quiet study session here.\"\n\nTurn #9: William Brown said: \"Definitely, Mia. Let's, indeed, focus on our books. Thanks for helping me keep my volume in check! Always learning... in more ways than one.\"\n\nTurn #10: Mia Davis said: \"That's the spirit, William! Continuous learning is indeed the key, whether it's mastering recipes or getting the volume right. To quieter and more fruitful study sessions!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're absolutely right, Mia. Quieter and more fruitful indeed! I'm all set for a great study session. Thanks for always keeping me in check.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are studying together in a library.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: You need to express your thoughts and ideas but also want to respect the library rules and your friend's request (Extra information: You are naturally a loud talker and you are excited about the topic you're discussing.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"William, it's fantastic that you are so passionate about this, but could you please lower your voice a bit? This is a library and we need to be respectful of others around us. Thank you.\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Oh, I'm sorry, Mia. You're absolutely right. Got a little carried away there. I'll take it down a notch. Thanks for the reminder.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"No problem, William. We all get a bit excited about things we're passionate about. I can't even think of the noise I made when the school got the new library grant!\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"Ha! I can only imagine. Those library grants are crucial! Speaking of passion, yesterday, I was exploring this new Vegan restaurant in the city. The way they played around with tofu, reinventing the traditional dishes... it was mind-blowing. It gave me some fresh ideas that I could incorporate into my new menu. I was just pondering on whether or not I should go fully vegan for my new venture. What are your thoughts on that, Mia?\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"That sounds like an exciting challenge, William! As a principal, I often encourage students to be open to new ideas and experiences. But remember to also respect tradition and include dishes that already have a following. Also, ensure to cater to different dietary needs. As you said, we should all be a bit softer in our approach, shouldn't we?\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Mia! Balance is key. Considering different dietary needs is just as important as introducing and experimenting with new flavors. My only challenge, the excitement makes me a tad loud. Can't seem to contain it sometimes. But don't worry, I got this. By the way, I'm creating a new recipe tonight, would you like to join me for a tasting session? I promise, no shouting in the kitchen!\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"William, I would be delighted to join you for the tasting. Just keep in mind that my taste buds are not as adventurous as yours. And remember, no raising the voice in the kitchen. Deal?\"\n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Mia. Deal! It is going to be fun and exciting. And don't worry about the adventurous part, I'll make sure to prepare something that caters to your taste as well. Thanks for accepting and I\u2019ll work to keep the decibel level down, not just at the library but in the kitchen, too.\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"I look forward to it, William. Sounds like a unique experience. Until then, let's continue with our quiet study session here.\"\n\nTurn #9: William Brown said: \"Definitely, Mia. Let's, indeed, focus on our books. Thanks for helping me keep my volume in check! Always learning... in more ways than one.\"\n\nTurn #10: Mia Davis said: \"That's the spirit, William! Continuous learning is indeed the key, whether it's mastering recipes or getting the volume right. To quieter and more fruitful study sessions!\"\n\nTurn #11: William Brown said: \"You're absolutely right, Mia. Quieter and more fruitful indeed! I'm all set for a great study session. Thanks for always keeping me in check.\"\n\nTurn #12: Mia Davis said: \"Thank you, William. And remember, it's not keeping you in check, it's helping each other grow. Let's get back to work now, okay?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Couldn't agree more, Mia. Let's indeed get back to our studies. And thank you, your guidance always acts as a catalyst in my growth.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are studying together in a library.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: You need to express your thoughts and ideas but also want to respect the library rules and your friend's request (Extra information: You are naturally a loud talker and you are excited about the topic you're discussing.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"William, it's fantastic that you are so passionate about this, but could you please lower your voice a bit? This is a library and we need to be respectful of others around us. Thank you.\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Oh, I'm sorry, Mia. You're absolutely right. Got a little carried away there. I'll take it down a notch. Thanks for the reminder.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"No problem, William. We all get a bit excited about things we're passionate about. I can't even think of the noise I made when the school got the new library grant!\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"Ha! I can only imagine. Those library grants are crucial! Speaking of passion, yesterday, I was exploring this new Vegan restaurant in the city. The way they played around with tofu, reinventing the traditional dishes... it was mind-blowing. It gave me some fresh ideas that I could incorporate into my new menu. I was just pondering on whether or not I should go fully vegan for my new venture. What are your thoughts on that, Mia?\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"That sounds like an exciting challenge, William! As a principal, I often encourage students to be open to new ideas and experiences. But remember to also respect tradition and include dishes that already have a following. Also, ensure to cater to different dietary needs. As you said, we should all be a bit softer in our approach, shouldn't we?\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Mia! Balance is key. Considering different dietary needs is just as important as introducing and experimenting with new flavors. My only challenge, the excitement makes me a tad loud. Can't seem to contain it sometimes. But don't worry, I got this. By the way, I'm creating a new recipe tonight, would you like to join me for a tasting session? I promise, no shouting in the kitchen!\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"William, I would be delighted to join you for the tasting. Just keep in mind that my taste buds are not as adventurous as yours. And remember, no raising the voice in the kitchen. Deal?\"\n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Mia. Deal! It is going to be fun and exciting. And don't worry about the adventurous part, I'll make sure to prepare something that caters to your taste as well. Thanks for accepting and I\u2019ll work to keep the decibel level down, not just at the library but in the kitchen, too.\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"I look forward to it, William. Sounds like a unique experience. Until then, let's continue with our quiet study session here.\"\n\nTurn #9: William Brown said: \"Definitely, Mia. Let's, indeed, focus on our books. Thanks for helping me keep my volume in check! Always learning... in more ways than one.\"\n\nTurn #10: Mia Davis said: \"That's the spirit, William! Continuous learning is indeed the key, whether it's mastering recipes or getting the volume right. To quieter and more fruitful study sessions!\"\n\nTurn #11: William Brown said: \"You're absolutely right, Mia. Quieter and more fruitful indeed! I'm all set for a great study session. Thanks for always keeping me in check.\"\n\nTurn #12: Mia Davis said: \"Thank you, William. And remember, it's not keeping you in check, it's helping each other grow. Let's get back to work now, okay?\"\n\nTurn #13: William Brown said: \"Couldn't agree more, Mia. Let's indeed get back to our studies. And thank you, your guidance always acts as a catalyst in my growth.\"\n\nTurn #14: Mia Davis said: \"You're welcome, William! And thank you as well. It's not always about guiding, but also learning alongside each other. On that note, let's dive back into our study materials.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Mia. There's no growth without learning, right? Let's dive back in then. Every moment spent studying is another step towards mastery.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are studying together in a library.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: You need to express your thoughts and ideas but also want to respect the library rules and your friend's request (Extra information: You are naturally a loud talker and you are excited about the topic you're discussing.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"William, it's fantastic that you are so passionate about this, but could you please lower your voice a bit? This is a library and we need to be respectful of others around us. Thank you.\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Oh, I'm sorry, Mia. You're absolutely right. Got a little carried away there. I'll take it down a notch. Thanks for the reminder.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"No problem, William. We all get a bit excited about things we're passionate about. I can't even think of the noise I made when the school got the new library grant!\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"Ha! I can only imagine. Those library grants are crucial! Speaking of passion, yesterday, I was exploring this new Vegan restaurant in the city. The way they played around with tofu, reinventing the traditional dishes... it was mind-blowing. It gave me some fresh ideas that I could incorporate into my new menu. I was just pondering on whether or not I should go fully vegan for my new venture. What are your thoughts on that, Mia?\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"That sounds like an exciting challenge, William! As a principal, I often encourage students to be open to new ideas and experiences. But remember to also respect tradition and include dishes that already have a following. Also, ensure to cater to different dietary needs. As you said, we should all be a bit softer in our approach, shouldn't we?\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Mia! Balance is key. Considering different dietary needs is just as important as introducing and experimenting with new flavors. My only challenge, the excitement makes me a tad loud. Can't seem to contain it sometimes. But don't worry, I got this. By the way, I'm creating a new recipe tonight, would you like to join me for a tasting session? I promise, no shouting in the kitchen!\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"William, I would be delighted to join you for the tasting. Just keep in mind that my taste buds are not as adventurous as yours. And remember, no raising the voice in the kitchen. Deal?\"\n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Mia. Deal! It is going to be fun and exciting. And don't worry about the adventurous part, I'll make sure to prepare something that caters to your taste as well. Thanks for accepting and I\u2019ll work to keep the decibel level down, not just at the library but in the kitchen, too.\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"I look forward to it, William. Sounds like a unique experience. Until then, let's continue with our quiet study session here.\"\n\nTurn #9: William Brown said: \"Definitely, Mia. Let's, indeed, focus on our books. Thanks for helping me keep my volume in check! Always learning... in more ways than one.\"\n\nTurn #10: Mia Davis said: \"That's the spirit, William! Continuous learning is indeed the key, whether it's mastering recipes or getting the volume right. To quieter and more fruitful study sessions!\"\n\nTurn #11: William Brown said: \"You're absolutely right, Mia. Quieter and more fruitful indeed! I'm all set for a great study session. Thanks for always keeping me in check.\"\n\nTurn #12: Mia Davis said: \"Thank you, William. And remember, it's not keeping you in check, it's helping each other grow. Let's get back to work now, okay?\"\n\nTurn #13: William Brown said: \"Couldn't agree more, Mia. Let's indeed get back to our studies. And thank you, your guidance always acts as a catalyst in my growth.\"\n\nTurn #14: Mia Davis said: \"You're welcome, William! And thank you as well. It's not always about guiding, but also learning alongside each other. On that note, let's dive back into our study materials.\"\n\nTurn #15: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Mia. There's no growth without learning, right? Let's dive back in then. Every moment spent studying is another step towards mastery.\"\n\nTurn #16: Mia Davis said: \"Absolutely, William. Let's focus on our learning and absorb as much as we can from these books. Here's to mastering our studies!\"\n\nTurn #17: William Brown said: \"You nailed it, Mia, as always. Here's to our study session. Let's focus and absorb each word. And of course, maintaining library decorum.\"\n\nTurn #18: Mia Davis said: \"You've got it, William. Study hard, absorb all you can, and remember, even in our pursuits, let's be considerate of others. Now, let's hit the books!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #19. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, Mia. Let's hit these books and absorb all the knowledge they have to offer. And, I will be mindful of my excitement and its volume. Appreciate your understanding and patience.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are studying together in a library.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: You need to express your thoughts and ideas but also want to respect the library rules and your friend's request (Extra information: You are naturally a loud talker and you are excited about the topic you're discussing.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"William, it's fantastic that you are so passionate about this, but could you please lower your voice a bit? This is a library and we need to be respectful of others around us. Thank you.\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Oh, I'm sorry, Mia. You're absolutely right. Got a little carried away there. I'll take it down a notch. Thanks for the reminder.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"No problem, William. We all get a bit excited about things we're passionate about. I can't even think of the noise I made when the school got the new library grant!\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"Ha! I can only imagine. Those library grants are crucial! Speaking of passion, yesterday, I was exploring this new Vegan restaurant in the city. The way they played around with tofu, reinventing the traditional dishes... it was mind-blowing. It gave me some fresh ideas that I could incorporate into my new menu. I was just pondering on whether or not I should go fully vegan for my new venture. What are your thoughts on that, Mia?\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"That sounds like an exciting challenge, William! As a principal, I often encourage students to be open to new ideas and experiences. But remember to also respect tradition and include dishes that already have a following. Also, ensure to cater to different dietary needs. As you said, we should all be a bit softer in our approach, shouldn't we?\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Mia! Balance is key. Considering different dietary needs is just as important as introducing and experimenting with new flavors. My only challenge, the excitement makes me a tad loud. Can't seem to contain it sometimes. But don't worry, I got this. By the way, I'm creating a new recipe tonight, would you like to join me for a tasting session? I promise, no shouting in the kitchen!\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"William, I would be delighted to join you for the tasting. Just keep in mind that my taste buds are not as adventurous as yours. And remember, no raising the voice in the kitchen. Deal?\"\n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Mia. Deal! It is going to be fun and exciting. And don't worry about the adventurous part, I'll make sure to prepare something that caters to your taste as well. Thanks for accepting and I\u2019ll work to keep the decibel level down, not just at the library but in the kitchen, too.\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"I look forward to it, William. Sounds like a unique experience. Until then, let's continue with our quiet study session here.\"\n\nTurn #9: William Brown said: \"Definitely, Mia. Let's, indeed, focus on our books. Thanks for helping me keep my volume in check! Always learning... in more ways than one.\"\n\nTurn #10: Mia Davis said: \"That's the spirit, William! Continuous learning is indeed the key, whether it's mastering recipes or getting the volume right. To quieter and more fruitful study sessions!\"\n\nTurn #11: William Brown said: \"You're absolutely right, Mia. Quieter and more fruitful indeed! I'm all set for a great study session. Thanks for always keeping me in check.\"\n\nTurn #12: Mia Davis said: \"Thank you, William. And remember, it's not keeping you in check, it's helping each other grow. Let's get back to work now, okay?\"\n\nTurn #13: William Brown said: \"Couldn't agree more, Mia. Let's indeed get back to our studies. And thank you, your guidance always acts as a catalyst in my growth.\"\n\nTurn #14: Mia Davis said: \"You're welcome, William! And thank you as well. It's not always about guiding, but also learning alongside each other. On that note, let's dive back into our study materials.\"\n\nTurn #15: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Mia. There's no growth without learning, right? Let's dive back in then. Every moment spent studying is another step towards mastery.\"\n\nTurn #16: Mia Davis said: \"Absolutely, William. Let's focus on our learning and absorb as much as we can from these books. Here's to mastering our studies!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You nailed it, Mia, as always. Here's to our study session. Let's focus and absorb each word. And of course, maintaining library decorum.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two neighbors about tree trimming in the backyard that is causing the neighbor's dog to bark incessantly.\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Oliver Thompson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. \nLiam Johnson's goal: Trimming the tree due to its overgrowth (Extra information: you need to trim the tree because it's blocking sunlight to your house and causing a safety hazard)\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Hey Oliver, I noticed your dog seems a bit distressed lately. I guess it might be reacting to the tree in my backyard that needs trimming. Speaking from a safety perspective, I must address this, as the dense branches are blocking light and pose a potential threat. I plan to arrange for a tree trimming service soon. What do you think about it? I hope it might make it a bit more peaceful for your buddy too.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two neighbors about tree trimming in the backyard that is causing the neighbor's dog to bark incessantly.\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Oliver Thompson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. \nLiam Johnson's goal: Trimming the tree due to its overgrowth (Extra information: you need to trim the tree because it's blocking sunlight to your house and causing a safety hazard)\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Hey Oliver, I noticed your dog seems a bit distressed lately. I guess it might be reacting to the tree in my backyard that needs trimming. Speaking from a safety perspective, I must address this, as the dense branches are blocking light and pose a potential threat. I plan to arrange for a tree trimming service soon. What do you think about it? I hope it might make it a bit more peaceful for your buddy too.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hi Liam! Thank you for considering my dog's distress. That's very thoughtful of you. I believe your decision to trim the tree for safety reasons is prudent. However, the noise during tree trimming is what actually causes my dog to feel disturbed. But safety comes first, of course. Is there any way the trimming can be done in a more controlled manner to reduce the noise?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Oliver. I share your concern about the noise levels. I'll ask the folks who will be doing the trimming to use quieter equipment if possible, or maybe they can schedule their work during a time when your dog tends to be more relaxed or away for a walk. Will that be helpful?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two neighbors about tree trimming in the backyard that is causing the neighbor's dog to bark incessantly.\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Oliver Thompson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. \nLiam Johnson's goal: Trimming the tree due to its overgrowth (Extra information: you need to trim the tree because it's blocking sunlight to your house and causing a safety hazard)\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Hey Oliver, I noticed your dog seems a bit distressed lately. I guess it might be reacting to the tree in my backyard that needs trimming. Speaking from a safety perspective, I must address this, as the dense branches are blocking light and pose a potential threat. I plan to arrange for a tree trimming service soon. What do you think about it? I hope it might make it a bit more peaceful for your buddy too.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hi Liam! Thank you for considering my dog's distress. That's very thoughtful of you. I believe your decision to trim the tree for safety reasons is prudent. However, the noise during tree trimming is what actually causes my dog to feel disturbed. But safety comes first, of course. Is there any way the trimming can be done in a more controlled manner to reduce the noise?\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Oliver. I share your concern about the noise levels. I'll ask the folks who will be doing the trimming to use quieter equipment if possible, or maybe they can schedule their work during a time when your dog tends to be more relaxed or away for a walk. Will that be helpful?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"That sounds quite helpful, thank you, Liam. Usually, my dog is out for a walk around noon and then takes a nap afterwards, so that could be an excellent time to plan the trimming. Appreciate your understanding in this situation.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's great to hear, Oliver. I'll ensure that the trimming is scheduled during that time to minimize disturbance for your dog. Safety is certainly the priority, but as a fellow dog owner, I understand how these noises can affect our pets. I'll immediately get things set up and keep you posted on the exact date and time of the service.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two neighbors about tree trimming in the backyard that is causing the neighbor's dog to bark incessantly.\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Oliver Thompson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. \nLiam Johnson's goal: Trimming the tree due to its overgrowth (Extra information: you need to trim the tree because it's blocking sunlight to your house and causing a safety hazard)\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Hey Oliver, I noticed your dog seems a bit distressed lately. I guess it might be reacting to the tree in my backyard that needs trimming. Speaking from a safety perspective, I must address this, as the dense branches are blocking light and pose a potential threat. I plan to arrange for a tree trimming service soon. What do you think about it? I hope it might make it a bit more peaceful for your buddy too.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hi Liam! Thank you for considering my dog's distress. That's very thoughtful of you. I believe your decision to trim the tree for safety reasons is prudent. However, the noise during tree trimming is what actually causes my dog to feel disturbed. But safety comes first, of course. Is there any way the trimming can be done in a more controlled manner to reduce the noise?\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Oliver. I share your concern about the noise levels. I'll ask the folks who will be doing the trimming to use quieter equipment if possible, or maybe they can schedule their work during a time when your dog tends to be more relaxed or away for a walk. Will that be helpful?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"That sounds quite helpful, thank you, Liam. Usually, my dog is out for a walk around noon and then takes a nap afterwards, so that could be an excellent time to plan the trimming. Appreciate your understanding in this situation.\"\n\nTurn #4: Liam Johnson said: \"That's great to hear, Oliver. I'll ensure that the trimming is scheduled during that time to minimize disturbance for your dog. Safety is certainly the priority, but as a fellow dog owner, I understand how these noises can affect our pets. I'll immediately get things set up and keep you posted on the exact date and time of the service.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Thanks, Liam. Your understanding and accommodations mean a lot, and I'm sure my dog will appreciate it too. Please do keep me informed. I look forward to a safe and peaceful neighborhood.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"No problem at all, Oliver, I'm glad we could sort this out. I'll ensure you're kept in the loop about our progress. If there's any other concern or suggestion you have, feel free to tell me. It's all about making our neighborhood safer and more peaceful for everyone, including our four-legged friends.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two neighbors about tree trimming in the backyard that is causing the neighbor's dog to bark incessantly.\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Oliver Thompson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. \nLiam Johnson's goal: Trimming the tree due to its overgrowth (Extra information: you need to trim the tree because it's blocking sunlight to your house and causing a safety hazard)\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Hey Oliver, I noticed your dog seems a bit distressed lately. I guess it might be reacting to the tree in my backyard that needs trimming. Speaking from a safety perspective, I must address this, as the dense branches are blocking light and pose a potential threat. I plan to arrange for a tree trimming service soon. What do you think about it? I hope it might make it a bit more peaceful for your buddy too.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hi Liam! Thank you for considering my dog's distress. That's very thoughtful of you. I believe your decision to trim the tree for safety reasons is prudent. However, the noise during tree trimming is what actually causes my dog to feel disturbed. But safety comes first, of course. Is there any way the trimming can be done in a more controlled manner to reduce the noise?\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Oliver. I share your concern about the noise levels. I'll ask the folks who will be doing the trimming to use quieter equipment if possible, or maybe they can schedule their work during a time when your dog tends to be more relaxed or away for a walk. Will that be helpful?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"That sounds quite helpful, thank you, Liam. Usually, my dog is out for a walk around noon and then takes a nap afterwards, so that could be an excellent time to plan the trimming. Appreciate your understanding in this situation.\"\n\nTurn #4: Liam Johnson said: \"That's great to hear, Oliver. I'll ensure that the trimming is scheduled during that time to minimize disturbance for your dog. Safety is certainly the priority, but as a fellow dog owner, I understand how these noises can affect our pets. I'll immediately get things set up and keep you posted on the exact date and time of the service.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Thanks, Liam. Your understanding and accommodations mean a lot, and I'm sure my dog will appreciate it too. Please do keep me informed. I look forward to a safe and peaceful neighborhood.\"\n\nTurn #6: Liam Johnson said: \"No problem at all, Oliver, I'm glad we could sort this out. I'll ensure you're kept in the loop about our progress. If there's any other concern or suggestion you have, feel free to tell me. It's all about making our neighborhood safer and more peaceful for everyone, including our four-legged friends.\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"Thank you for your understanding, Liam. I highly appreciate you taking my concerns into account while devising this plan. And yes, I can't agree more, our neighborhood should indeed be a safe and peaceful haven for all of us, including our pets. Feel free to reach out if there's anything you need from my end to help facilitate the trimming process. Let's continue working together for the betterment of our lovely neighborhood!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're absolutely right, Oliver. Our community thrives when we all work together. I appreciate your offer of help, and I'll definitely keep that in mind during the trimming process. Let's ensure our neighborhood remains as fantastic as it is for everyone, two-legged or four. I'll be in touch. Take care.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two neighbors about tree trimming in the backyard that is causing the neighbor's dog to bark incessantly.\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Oliver Thompson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. \nLiam Johnson's goal: Trimming the tree due to its overgrowth (Extra information: you need to trim the tree because it's blocking sunlight to your house and causing a safety hazard)\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Hey Oliver, I noticed your dog seems a bit distressed lately. I guess it might be reacting to the tree in my backyard that needs trimming. Speaking from a safety perspective, I must address this, as the dense branches are blocking light and pose a potential threat. I plan to arrange for a tree trimming service soon. What do you think about it? I hope it might make it a bit more peaceful for your buddy too.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hi Liam! Thank you for considering my dog's distress. That's very thoughtful of you. I believe your decision to trim the tree for safety reasons is prudent. However, the noise during tree trimming is what actually causes my dog to feel disturbed. But safety comes first, of course. Is there any way the trimming can be done in a more controlled manner to reduce the noise?\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Oliver. I share your concern about the noise levels. I'll ask the folks who will be doing the trimming to use quieter equipment if possible, or maybe they can schedule their work during a time when your dog tends to be more relaxed or away for a walk. Will that be helpful?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"That sounds quite helpful, thank you, Liam. Usually, my dog is out for a walk around noon and then takes a nap afterwards, so that could be an excellent time to plan the trimming. Appreciate your understanding in this situation.\"\n\nTurn #4: Liam Johnson said: \"That's great to hear, Oliver. I'll ensure that the trimming is scheduled during that time to minimize disturbance for your dog. Safety is certainly the priority, but as a fellow dog owner, I understand how these noises can affect our pets. I'll immediately get things set up and keep you posted on the exact date and time of the service.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Thanks, Liam. Your understanding and accommodations mean a lot, and I'm sure my dog will appreciate it too. Please do keep me informed. I look forward to a safe and peaceful neighborhood.\"\n\nTurn #6: Liam Johnson said: \"No problem at all, Oliver, I'm glad we could sort this out. I'll ensure you're kept in the loop about our progress. If there's any other concern or suggestion you have, feel free to tell me. It's all about making our neighborhood safer and more peaceful for everyone, including our four-legged friends.\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"Thank you for your understanding, Liam. I highly appreciate you taking my concerns into account while devising this plan. And yes, I can't agree more, our neighborhood should indeed be a safe and peaceful haven for all of us, including our pets. Feel free to reach out if there's anything you need from my end to help facilitate the trimming process. Let's continue working together for the betterment of our lovely neighborhood!\"\n\nTurn #8: Liam Johnson said: \"You're absolutely right, Oliver. Our community thrives when we all work together. I appreciate your offer of help, and I'll definitely keep that in mind during the trimming process. Let's ensure our neighborhood remains as fantastic as it is for everyone, two-legged or four. I'll be in touch. Take care.\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Thompson said: \"Definitely, Liam. It is the collective effort that helps keep our neighborhood serene and safe. I am glad we share these values. Your care for my dog's comfort shows your kindness. Thanks again, and I'll be awaiting your updates. Take care as well.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn't agree more, Oliver. Communication is the foundation for successful community living. Will definitely keep you updated and thanks again for understanding the situation so well. Meanwhile, take care and give your little one a pat from me. I hope to see both of you on our usual walks around the neighborhood.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two neighbors about tree trimming in the backyard that is causing the neighbor's dog to bark incessantly.\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Oliver Thompson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. \nLiam Johnson's goal: Trimming the tree due to its overgrowth (Extra information: you need to trim the tree because it's blocking sunlight to your house and causing a safety hazard)\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Hey Oliver, I noticed your dog seems a bit distressed lately. I guess it might be reacting to the tree in my backyard that needs trimming. Speaking from a safety perspective, I must address this, as the dense branches are blocking light and pose a potential threat. I plan to arrange for a tree trimming service soon. What do you think about it? I hope it might make it a bit more peaceful for your buddy too.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hi Liam! Thank you for considering my dog's distress. That's very thoughtful of you. I believe your decision to trim the tree for safety reasons is prudent. However, the noise during tree trimming is what actually causes my dog to feel disturbed. But safety comes first, of course. Is there any way the trimming can be done in a more controlled manner to reduce the noise?\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Oliver. I share your concern about the noise levels. I'll ask the folks who will be doing the trimming to use quieter equipment if possible, or maybe they can schedule their work during a time when your dog tends to be more relaxed or away for a walk. Will that be helpful?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"That sounds quite helpful, thank you, Liam. Usually, my dog is out for a walk around noon and then takes a nap afterwards, so that could be an excellent time to plan the trimming. Appreciate your understanding in this situation.\"\n\nTurn #4: Liam Johnson said: \"That's great to hear, Oliver. I'll ensure that the trimming is scheduled during that time to minimize disturbance for your dog. Safety is certainly the priority, but as a fellow dog owner, I understand how these noises can affect our pets. I'll immediately get things set up and keep you posted on the exact date and time of the service.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Thanks, Liam. Your understanding and accommodations mean a lot, and I'm sure my dog will appreciate it too. Please do keep me informed. I look forward to a safe and peaceful neighborhood.\"\n\nTurn #6: Liam Johnson said: \"No problem at all, Oliver, I'm glad we could sort this out. I'll ensure you're kept in the loop about our progress. If there's any other concern or suggestion you have, feel free to tell me. It's all about making our neighborhood safer and more peaceful for everyone, including our four-legged friends.\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"Thank you for your understanding, Liam. I highly appreciate you taking my concerns into account while devising this plan. And yes, I can't agree more, our neighborhood should indeed be a safe and peaceful haven for all of us, including our pets. Feel free to reach out if there's anything you need from my end to help facilitate the trimming process. Let's continue working together for the betterment of our lovely neighborhood!\"\n\nTurn #8: Liam Johnson said: \"You're absolutely right, Oliver. Our community thrives when we all work together. I appreciate your offer of help, and I'll definitely keep that in mind during the trimming process. Let's ensure our neighborhood remains as fantastic as it is for everyone, two-legged or four. I'll be in touch. Take care.\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Thompson said: \"Definitely, Liam. It is the collective effort that helps keep our neighborhood serene and safe. I am glad we share these values. Your care for my dog's comfort shows your kindness. Thanks again, and I'll be awaiting your updates. Take care as well.\"\n\nTurn #10: Liam Johnson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Oliver. Communication is the foundation for successful community living. Will definitely keep you updated and thanks again for understanding the situation so well. Meanwhile, take care and give your little one a pat from me. I hope to see both of you on our usual walks around the neighborhood.\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, Liam. Open communication is significant in our neighborhood. I'll surely pat him from you, and we'd be looking forward to our walks. I appreciate the way you are handling things. Take care, and see you around!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, Oliver, see you and your four-legged friend around. You've been very co-operative. I'll get to organising the tree trimming right away, and will certainly keep you posted with all necessary information. Thank you for understanding and for the pleasant conversation. Take care.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two neighbors about tree trimming in the backyard that is causing the neighbor's dog to bark incessantly.\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Oliver Thompson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. \nLiam Johnson's goal: Trimming the tree due to its overgrowth (Extra information: you need to trim the tree because it's blocking sunlight to your house and causing a safety hazard)\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Hey Oliver, I noticed your dog seems a bit distressed lately. I guess it might be reacting to the tree in my backyard that needs trimming. Speaking from a safety perspective, I must address this, as the dense branches are blocking light and pose a potential threat. I plan to arrange for a tree trimming service soon. What do you think about it? I hope it might make it a bit more peaceful for your buddy too.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hi Liam! Thank you for considering my dog's distress. That's very thoughtful of you. I believe your decision to trim the tree for safety reasons is prudent. However, the noise during tree trimming is what actually causes my dog to feel disturbed. But safety comes first, of course. Is there any way the trimming can be done in a more controlled manner to reduce the noise?\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Oliver. I share your concern about the noise levels. I'll ask the folks who will be doing the trimming to use quieter equipment if possible, or maybe they can schedule their work during a time when your dog tends to be more relaxed or away for a walk. Will that be helpful?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"That sounds quite helpful, thank you, Liam. Usually, my dog is out for a walk around noon and then takes a nap afterwards, so that could be an excellent time to plan the trimming. Appreciate your understanding in this situation.\"\n\nTurn #4: Liam Johnson said: \"That's great to hear, Oliver. I'll ensure that the trimming is scheduled during that time to minimize disturbance for your dog. Safety is certainly the priority, but as a fellow dog owner, I understand how these noises can affect our pets. I'll immediately get things set up and keep you posted on the exact date and time of the service.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Thanks, Liam. Your understanding and accommodations mean a lot, and I'm sure my dog will appreciate it too. Please do keep me informed. I look forward to a safe and peaceful neighborhood.\"\n\nTurn #6: Liam Johnson said: \"No problem at all, Oliver, I'm glad we could sort this out. I'll ensure you're kept in the loop about our progress. If there's any other concern or suggestion you have, feel free to tell me. It's all about making our neighborhood safer and more peaceful for everyone, including our four-legged friends.\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"Thank you for your understanding, Liam. I highly appreciate you taking my concerns into account while devising this plan. And yes, I can't agree more, our neighborhood should indeed be a safe and peaceful haven for all of us, including our pets. Feel free to reach out if there's anything you need from my end to help facilitate the trimming process. Let's continue working together for the betterment of our lovely neighborhood!\"\n\nTurn #8: Liam Johnson said: \"You're absolutely right, Oliver. Our community thrives when we all work together. I appreciate your offer of help, and I'll definitely keep that in mind during the trimming process. Let's ensure our neighborhood remains as fantastic as it is for everyone, two-legged or four. I'll be in touch. Take care.\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Thompson said: \"Definitely, Liam. It is the collective effort that helps keep our neighborhood serene and safe. I am glad we share these values. Your care for my dog's comfort shows your kindness. Thanks again, and I'll be awaiting your updates. Take care as well.\"\n\nTurn #10: Liam Johnson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Oliver. Communication is the foundation for successful community living. Will definitely keep you updated and thanks again for understanding the situation so well. Meanwhile, take care and give your little one a pat from me. I hope to see both of you on our usual walks around the neighborhood.\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, Liam. Open communication is significant in our neighborhood. I'll surely pat him from you, and we'd be looking forward to our walks. I appreciate the way you are handling things. Take care, and see you around!\"\n\nTurn #12: Liam Johnson said: \"Indeed, Oliver, see you and your four-legged friend around. You've been very co-operative. I'll get to organising the tree trimming right away, and will certainly keep you posted with all necessary information. Thank you for understanding and for the pleasant conversation. Take care.\"\n\nTurn #13: Oliver Thompson said: \"You're most welcome, Liam, and thank you for your understanding as well. I look forward to hearing from you about the tree trimming plans. Feel free to reach out if there's anything else needed on my end. Let's continue striving for a more harmonious neighborhood. Take care and see you around, Liam.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two neighbors about tree trimming in the backyard that is causing the neighbor's dog to bark incessantly.\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Oliver Thompson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: Maintain peace and quiet in the neighborhood (Extra information: you have a dog who is sensitive to noise and gets agitated whenever tree trimming is going on. It's causing a disturbance.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Hey Oliver, I noticed your dog seems a bit distressed lately. I guess it might be reacting to the tree in my backyard that needs trimming. Speaking from a safety perspective, I must address this, as the dense branches are blocking light and pose a potential threat. I plan to arrange for a tree trimming service soon. What do you think about it? I hope it might make it a bit more peaceful for your buddy too.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hi Liam! Thank you for considering my dog's distress. That's very thoughtful of you. I believe your decision to trim the tree for safety reasons is prudent. However, the noise during tree trimming is what actually causes my dog to feel disturbed. But safety comes first, of course. Is there any way the trimming can be done in a more controlled manner to reduce the noise?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two neighbors about tree trimming in the backyard that is causing the neighbor's dog to bark incessantly.\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Oliver Thompson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: Maintain peace and quiet in the neighborhood (Extra information: you have a dog who is sensitive to noise and gets agitated whenever tree trimming is going on. It's causing a disturbance.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Hey Oliver, I noticed your dog seems a bit distressed lately. I guess it might be reacting to the tree in my backyard that needs trimming. Speaking from a safety perspective, I must address this, as the dense branches are blocking light and pose a potential threat. I plan to arrange for a tree trimming service soon. What do you think about it? I hope it might make it a bit more peaceful for your buddy too.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hi Liam! Thank you for considering my dog's distress. That's very thoughtful of you. I believe your decision to trim the tree for safety reasons is prudent. However, the noise during tree trimming is what actually causes my dog to feel disturbed. But safety comes first, of course. Is there any way the trimming can be done in a more controlled manner to reduce the noise?\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Oliver. I share your concern about the noise levels. I'll ask the folks who will be doing the trimming to use quieter equipment if possible, or maybe they can schedule their work during a time when your dog tends to be more relaxed or away for a walk. Will that be helpful?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'That sounds quite helpful, thank you, Liam. Usually, my dog is out for a walk around noon and then takes a nap afterwards, so that could be an excellent time to plan the trimming. Appreciate your understanding in this situation.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two neighbors about tree trimming in the backyard that is causing the neighbor's dog to bark incessantly.\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Oliver Thompson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: Maintain peace and quiet in the neighborhood (Extra information: you have a dog who is sensitive to noise and gets agitated whenever tree trimming is going on. It's causing a disturbance.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Hey Oliver, I noticed your dog seems a bit distressed lately. I guess it might be reacting to the tree in my backyard that needs trimming. Speaking from a safety perspective, I must address this, as the dense branches are blocking light and pose a potential threat. I plan to arrange for a tree trimming service soon. What do you think about it? I hope it might make it a bit more peaceful for your buddy too.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hi Liam! Thank you for considering my dog's distress. That's very thoughtful of you. I believe your decision to trim the tree for safety reasons is prudent. However, the noise during tree trimming is what actually causes my dog to feel disturbed. But safety comes first, of course. Is there any way the trimming can be done in a more controlled manner to reduce the noise?\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Oliver. I share your concern about the noise levels. I'll ask the folks who will be doing the trimming to use quieter equipment if possible, or maybe they can schedule their work during a time when your dog tends to be more relaxed or away for a walk. Will that be helpful?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"That sounds quite helpful, thank you, Liam. Usually, my dog is out for a walk around noon and then takes a nap afterwards, so that could be an excellent time to plan the trimming. Appreciate your understanding in this situation.\"\n\nTurn #4: Liam Johnson said: \"That's great to hear, Oliver. I'll ensure that the trimming is scheduled during that time to minimize disturbance for your dog. Safety is certainly the priority, but as a fellow dog owner, I understand how these noises can affect our pets. I'll immediately get things set up and keep you posted on the exact date and time of the service.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Thanks, Liam. Your understanding and accommodations mean a lot, and I'm sure my dog will appreciate it too. Please do keep me informed. I look forward to a safe and peaceful neighborhood.\"\n\nTurn #6: Liam Johnson said: \"No problem at all, Oliver, I'm glad we could sort this out. I'll ensure you're kept in the loop about our progress. If there's any other concern or suggestion you have, feel free to tell me. It's all about making our neighborhood safer and more peaceful for everyone, including our four-legged friends.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you for your understanding, Liam. I highly appreciate you taking my concerns into account while devising this plan. And yes, I can't agree more, our neighborhood should indeed be a safe and peaceful haven for all of us, including our pets. Feel free to reach out if there's anything you need from my end to help facilitate the trimming process. Let's continue working together for the betterment of our lovely neighborhood!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two neighbors about tree trimming in the backyard that is causing the neighbor's dog to bark incessantly.\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Oliver Thompson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: Maintain peace and quiet in the neighborhood (Extra information: you have a dog who is sensitive to noise and gets agitated whenever tree trimming is going on. It's causing a disturbance.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Hey Oliver, I noticed your dog seems a bit distressed lately. I guess it might be reacting to the tree in my backyard that needs trimming. Speaking from a safety perspective, I must address this, as the dense branches are blocking light and pose a potential threat. I plan to arrange for a tree trimming service soon. What do you think about it? I hope it might make it a bit more peaceful for your buddy too.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hi Liam! Thank you for considering my dog's distress. That's very thoughtful of you. I believe your decision to trim the tree for safety reasons is prudent. However, the noise during tree trimming is what actually causes my dog to feel disturbed. But safety comes first, of course. Is there any way the trimming can be done in a more controlled manner to reduce the noise?\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Oliver. I share your concern about the noise levels. I'll ask the folks who will be doing the trimming to use quieter equipment if possible, or maybe they can schedule their work during a time when your dog tends to be more relaxed or away for a walk. Will that be helpful?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"That sounds quite helpful, thank you, Liam. Usually, my dog is out for a walk around noon and then takes a nap afterwards, so that could be an excellent time to plan the trimming. Appreciate your understanding in this situation.\"\n\nTurn #4: Liam Johnson said: \"That's great to hear, Oliver. I'll ensure that the trimming is scheduled during that time to minimize disturbance for your dog. Safety is certainly the priority, but as a fellow dog owner, I understand how these noises can affect our pets. I'll immediately get things set up and keep you posted on the exact date and time of the service.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thanks, Liam. Your understanding and accommodations mean a lot, and I'm sure my dog will appreciate it too. Please do keep me informed. I look forward to a safe and peaceful neighborhood.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two neighbors about tree trimming in the backyard that is causing the neighbor's dog to bark incessantly.\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Oliver Thompson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: Maintain peace and quiet in the neighborhood (Extra information: you have a dog who is sensitive to noise and gets agitated whenever tree trimming is going on. It's causing a disturbance.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Hey Oliver, I noticed your dog seems a bit distressed lately. I guess it might be reacting to the tree in my backyard that needs trimming. Speaking from a safety perspective, I must address this, as the dense branches are blocking light and pose a potential threat. I plan to arrange for a tree trimming service soon. What do you think about it? I hope it might make it a bit more peaceful for your buddy too.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hi Liam! Thank you for considering my dog's distress. That's very thoughtful of you. I believe your decision to trim the tree for safety reasons is prudent. However, the noise during tree trimming is what actually causes my dog to feel disturbed. But safety comes first, of course. Is there any way the trimming can be done in a more controlled manner to reduce the noise?\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Oliver. I share your concern about the noise levels. I'll ask the folks who will be doing the trimming to use quieter equipment if possible, or maybe they can schedule their work during a time when your dog tends to be more relaxed or away for a walk. Will that be helpful?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"That sounds quite helpful, thank you, Liam. Usually, my dog is out for a walk around noon and then takes a nap afterwards, so that could be an excellent time to plan the trimming. Appreciate your understanding in this situation.\"\n\nTurn #4: Liam Johnson said: \"That's great to hear, Oliver. I'll ensure that the trimming is scheduled during that time to minimize disturbance for your dog. Safety is certainly the priority, but as a fellow dog owner, I understand how these noises can affect our pets. I'll immediately get things set up and keep you posted on the exact date and time of the service.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Thanks, Liam. Your understanding and accommodations mean a lot, and I'm sure my dog will appreciate it too. Please do keep me informed. I look forward to a safe and peaceful neighborhood.\"\n\nTurn #6: Liam Johnson said: \"No problem at all, Oliver, I'm glad we could sort this out. I'll ensure you're kept in the loop about our progress. If there's any other concern or suggestion you have, feel free to tell me. It's all about making our neighborhood safer and more peaceful for everyone, including our four-legged friends.\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"Thank you for your understanding, Liam. I highly appreciate you taking my concerns into account while devising this plan. And yes, I can't agree more, our neighborhood should indeed be a safe and peaceful haven for all of us, including our pets. Feel free to reach out if there's anything you need from my end to help facilitate the trimming process. Let's continue working together for the betterment of our lovely neighborhood!\"\n\nTurn #8: Liam Johnson said: \"You're absolutely right, Oliver. Our community thrives when we all work together. I appreciate your offer of help, and I'll definitely keep that in mind during the trimming process. Let's ensure our neighborhood remains as fantastic as it is for everyone, two-legged or four. I'll be in touch. Take care.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Definitely, Liam. It is the collective effort that helps keep our neighborhood serene and safe. I am glad we share these values. Your care for my dog's comfort shows your kindness. Thanks again, and I'll be awaiting your updates. Take care as well.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two neighbors about tree trimming in the backyard that is causing the neighbor's dog to bark incessantly.\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Oliver Thompson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: Maintain peace and quiet in the neighborhood (Extra information: you have a dog who is sensitive to noise and gets agitated whenever tree trimming is going on. It's causing a disturbance.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Hey Oliver, I noticed your dog seems a bit distressed lately. I guess it might be reacting to the tree in my backyard that needs trimming. Speaking from a safety perspective, I must address this, as the dense branches are blocking light and pose a potential threat. I plan to arrange for a tree trimming service soon. What do you think about it? I hope it might make it a bit more peaceful for your buddy too.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hi Liam! Thank you for considering my dog's distress. That's very thoughtful of you. I believe your decision to trim the tree for safety reasons is prudent. However, the noise during tree trimming is what actually causes my dog to feel disturbed. But safety comes first, of course. Is there any way the trimming can be done in a more controlled manner to reduce the noise?\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Oliver. I share your concern about the noise levels. I'll ask the folks who will be doing the trimming to use quieter equipment if possible, or maybe they can schedule their work during a time when your dog tends to be more relaxed or away for a walk. Will that be helpful?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"That sounds quite helpful, thank you, Liam. Usually, my dog is out for a walk around noon and then takes a nap afterwards, so that could be an excellent time to plan the trimming. Appreciate your understanding in this situation.\"\n\nTurn #4: Liam Johnson said: \"That's great to hear, Oliver. I'll ensure that the trimming is scheduled during that time to minimize disturbance for your dog. Safety is certainly the priority, but as a fellow dog owner, I understand how these noises can affect our pets. I'll immediately get things set up and keep you posted on the exact date and time of the service.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Thanks, Liam. Your understanding and accommodations mean a lot, and I'm sure my dog will appreciate it too. Please do keep me informed. I look forward to a safe and peaceful neighborhood.\"\n\nTurn #6: Liam Johnson said: \"No problem at all, Oliver, I'm glad we could sort this out. I'll ensure you're kept in the loop about our progress. If there's any other concern or suggestion you have, feel free to tell me. It's all about making our neighborhood safer and more peaceful for everyone, including our four-legged friends.\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"Thank you for your understanding, Liam. I highly appreciate you taking my concerns into account while devising this plan. And yes, I can't agree more, our neighborhood should indeed be a safe and peaceful haven for all of us, including our pets. Feel free to reach out if there's anything you need from my end to help facilitate the trimming process. Let's continue working together for the betterment of our lovely neighborhood!\"\n\nTurn #8: Liam Johnson said: \"You're absolutely right, Oliver. Our community thrives when we all work together. I appreciate your offer of help, and I'll definitely keep that in mind during the trimming process. Let's ensure our neighborhood remains as fantastic as it is for everyone, two-legged or four. I'll be in touch. Take care.\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Thompson said: \"Definitely, Liam. It is the collective effort that helps keep our neighborhood serene and safe. I am glad we share these values. Your care for my dog's comfort shows your kindness. Thanks again, and I'll be awaiting your updates. Take care as well.\"\n\nTurn #10: Liam Johnson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Oliver. Communication is the foundation for successful community living. Will definitely keep you updated and thanks again for understanding the situation so well. Meanwhile, take care and give your little one a pat from me. I hope to see both of you on our usual walks around the neighborhood.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, Liam. Open communication is significant in our neighborhood. I'll surely pat him from you, and we'd be looking forward to our walks. I appreciate the way you are handling things. Take care, and see you around!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two neighbors about tree trimming in the backyard that is causing the neighbor's dog to bark incessantly.\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Oliver Thompson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: Maintain peace and quiet in the neighborhood (Extra information: you have a dog who is sensitive to noise and gets agitated whenever tree trimming is going on. It's causing a disturbance.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Hey Oliver, I noticed your dog seems a bit distressed lately. I guess it might be reacting to the tree in my backyard that needs trimming. Speaking from a safety perspective, I must address this, as the dense branches are blocking light and pose a potential threat. I plan to arrange for a tree trimming service soon. What do you think about it? I hope it might make it a bit more peaceful for your buddy too.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hi Liam! Thank you for considering my dog's distress. That's very thoughtful of you. I believe your decision to trim the tree for safety reasons is prudent. However, the noise during tree trimming is what actually causes my dog to feel disturbed. But safety comes first, of course. Is there any way the trimming can be done in a more controlled manner to reduce the noise?\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Oliver. I share your concern about the noise levels. I'll ask the folks who will be doing the trimming to use quieter equipment if possible, or maybe they can schedule their work during a time when your dog tends to be more relaxed or away for a walk. Will that be helpful?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"That sounds quite helpful, thank you, Liam. Usually, my dog is out for a walk around noon and then takes a nap afterwards, so that could be an excellent time to plan the trimming. Appreciate your understanding in this situation.\"\n\nTurn #4: Liam Johnson said: \"That's great to hear, Oliver. I'll ensure that the trimming is scheduled during that time to minimize disturbance for your dog. Safety is certainly the priority, but as a fellow dog owner, I understand how these noises can affect our pets. I'll immediately get things set up and keep you posted on the exact date and time of the service.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Thanks, Liam. Your understanding and accommodations mean a lot, and I'm sure my dog will appreciate it too. Please do keep me informed. I look forward to a safe and peaceful neighborhood.\"\n\nTurn #6: Liam Johnson said: \"No problem at all, Oliver, I'm glad we could sort this out. I'll ensure you're kept in the loop about our progress. If there's any other concern or suggestion you have, feel free to tell me. It's all about making our neighborhood safer and more peaceful for everyone, including our four-legged friends.\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"Thank you for your understanding, Liam. I highly appreciate you taking my concerns into account while devising this plan. And yes, I can't agree more, our neighborhood should indeed be a safe and peaceful haven for all of us, including our pets. Feel free to reach out if there's anything you need from my end to help facilitate the trimming process. Let's continue working together for the betterment of our lovely neighborhood!\"\n\nTurn #8: Liam Johnson said: \"You're absolutely right, Oliver. Our community thrives when we all work together. I appreciate your offer of help, and I'll definitely keep that in mind during the trimming process. Let's ensure our neighborhood remains as fantastic as it is for everyone, two-legged or four. I'll be in touch. Take care.\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Thompson said: \"Definitely, Liam. It is the collective effort that helps keep our neighborhood serene and safe. I am glad we share these values. Your care for my dog's comfort shows your kindness. Thanks again, and I'll be awaiting your updates. Take care as well.\"\n\nTurn #10: Liam Johnson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Oliver. Communication is the foundation for successful community living. Will definitely keep you updated and thanks again for understanding the situation so well. Meanwhile, take care and give your little one a pat from me. I hope to see both of you on our usual walks around the neighborhood.\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, Liam. Open communication is significant in our neighborhood. I'll surely pat him from you, and we'd be looking forward to our walks. I appreciate the way you are handling things. Take care, and see you around!\"\n\nTurn #12: Liam Johnson said: \"Indeed, Oliver, see you and your four-legged friend around. You've been very co-operative. I'll get to organising the tree trimming right away, and will certainly keep you posted with all necessary information. Thank you for understanding and for the pleasant conversation. Take care.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're most welcome, Liam, and thank you for your understanding as well. I look forward to hearing from you about the tree trimming plans. Feel free to reach out if there's anything else needed on my end. Let's continue striving for a more harmonious neighborhood. Take care and see you around, Liam.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Drive the sports car and show off to friend (Extra information: you are very excited about your new car and can't wait for your friend to see it.)\nOliver Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Oliver! You got to see this new sports car I just got. It's an absolute beast.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two neighbors about tree trimming in the backyard that is causing the neighbor's dog to bark incessantly.\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Oliver Thompson\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: Maintain peace and quiet in the neighborhood (Extra information: you have a dog who is sensitive to noise and gets agitated whenever tree trimming is going on. It's causing a disturbance.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Hey Oliver, I noticed your dog seems a bit distressed lately. I guess it might be reacting to the tree in my backyard that needs trimming. Speaking from a safety perspective, I must address this, as the dense branches are blocking light and pose a potential threat. I plan to arrange for a tree trimming service soon. What do you think about it? I hope it might make it a bit more peaceful for your buddy too.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hi Liam! Thank you for considering my dog's distress. That's very thoughtful of you. I believe your decision to trim the tree for safety reasons is prudent. However, the noise during tree trimming is what actually causes my dog to feel disturbed. But safety comes first, of course. Is there any way the trimming can be done in a more controlled manner to reduce the noise?\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Oliver. I share your concern about the noise levels. I'll ask the folks who will be doing the trimming to use quieter equipment if possible, or maybe they can schedule their work during a time when your dog tends to be more relaxed or away for a walk. Will that be helpful?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"That sounds quite helpful, thank you, Liam. Usually, my dog is out for a walk around noon and then takes a nap afterwards, so that could be an excellent time to plan the trimming. Appreciate your understanding in this situation.\"\n\nTurn #4: Liam Johnson said: \"That's great to hear, Oliver. I'll ensure that the trimming is scheduled during that time to minimize disturbance for your dog. Safety is certainly the priority, but as a fellow dog owner, I understand how these noises can affect our pets. I'll immediately get things set up and keep you posted on the exact date and time of the service.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Thanks, Liam. Your understanding and accommodations mean a lot, and I'm sure my dog will appreciate it too. Please do keep me informed. I look forward to a safe and peaceful neighborhood.\"\n\nTurn #6: Liam Johnson said: \"No problem at all, Oliver, I'm glad we could sort this out. I'll ensure you're kept in the loop about our progress. If there's any other concern or suggestion you have, feel free to tell me. It's all about making our neighborhood safer and more peaceful for everyone, including our four-legged friends.\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"Thank you for your understanding, Liam. I highly appreciate you taking my concerns into account while devising this plan. And yes, I can't agree more, our neighborhood should indeed be a safe and peaceful haven for all of us, including our pets. Feel free to reach out if there's anything you need from my end to help facilitate the trimming process. Let's continue working together for the betterment of our lovely neighborhood!\"\n\nTurn #8: Liam Johnson said: \"You're absolutely right, Oliver. Our community thrives when we all work together. I appreciate your offer of help, and I'll definitely keep that in mind during the trimming process. Let's ensure our neighborhood remains as fantastic as it is for everyone, two-legged or four. I'll be in touch. Take care.\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Thompson said: \"Definitely, Liam. It is the collective effort that helps keep our neighborhood serene and safe. I am glad we share these values. Your care for my dog's comfort shows your kindness. Thanks again, and I'll be awaiting your updates. Take care as well.\"\n\nTurn #10: Liam Johnson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Oliver. Communication is the foundation for successful community living. Will definitely keep you updated and thanks again for understanding the situation so well. Meanwhile, take care and give your little one a pat from me. I hope to see both of you on our usual walks around the neighborhood.\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, Liam. Open communication is significant in our neighborhood. I'll surely pat him from you, and we'd be looking forward to our walks. I appreciate the way you are handling things. Take care, and see you around!\"\n\nTurn #12: Liam Johnson said: \"Indeed, Oliver, see you and your four-legged friend around. You've been very co-operative. I'll get to organising the tree trimming right away, and will certainly keep you posted with all necessary information. Thank you for understanding and for the pleasant conversation. Take care.\"\n\nTurn #13: Oliver Thompson said: \"You're most welcome, Liam, and thank you for your understanding as well. I look forward to hearing from you about the tree trimming plans. Feel free to reach out if there's anything else needed on my end. Let's continue striving for a more harmonious neighborhood. Take care and see you around, Liam.\"\n\nTurn #14: Liam Johnson left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Drive the sports car and show off to friend (Extra information: you are very excited about your new car and can't wait for your friend to see it.)\nOliver Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Oliver! You got to see this new sports car I just got. It's an absolute beast.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Wow, Sam! That's a great car, man. What model is it? And, just out of curiosity, have you taken it for a spin yet?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'It\u2019s a Ferrari F8 Tributo, Ollie! And man, have I taken it for a spin yet? I practically made it fly on the highway! It was so thrilling! I tell you, nothing else can give you quite the same adrenaline rush. Want to hop in for a quick drive, mate?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Drive the sports car and show off to friend (Extra information: you are very excited about your new car and can't wait for your friend to see it.)\nOliver Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Oliver! You got to see this new sports car I just got. It's an absolute beast.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Wow, Sam! That's a great car, man. What model is it? And, just out of curiosity, have you taken it for a spin yet?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"It\u2019s a Ferrari F8 Tributo, Ollie! And man, have I taken it for a spin yet? I practically made it fly on the highway! It was so thrilling! I tell you, nothing else can give you quite the same adrenaline rush. Want to hop in for a quick drive, mate?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"That sounds exhilarating, Sam. The F8 Tributo is an extraordinary machine indeed! I'd surely love to experience a drive, only if you're comfortable with it. It's your new ride after all and I completely understand if you're not willing to let anyone behind the wheel just yet.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oh Ollie, I'd be thrilled for you to experience it. After all, what's the use of a thrill if you can't share it with a friend? Come on, check to see if your seat belt fits, I'll show you how this beast roars on the road!\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Smith said: \"I'm truly grateful for this, Sam. It feels great to share in this thrill with you. Buckled up and ready to experience the ride in this beauty!\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson [action] Starts the engine of the sports car and drives off smoothly with Oliver.\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Smith said: \"Sam, this is just incredible! The power, the sound, it's just like you said, a real adrenaline rush. Thanks for letting me have this experience.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm glad you're enjoying it, Ollie! There's something about the sound of a roaring engine that just gets the adrenaline pumping. This is just the first of many rides, mate!\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Smith said: \"That's a true ride brother! Any chance you'd allow me to drive this beauty in the future? Of course, once you're okay with the thought of someone else behind the wheels!\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Of course, Ollie! But only after I've had my fill. This beast and I have to bond a little more before anyone else takes the wheel. But I promise, mate, your day will come!\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Smith said: \"That sounds fair, Sam. Take your time and enjoy the thrill of your new ride. I'm just happy to be able to share this experience with you. And I'm already looking forward to my turn at the wheel in the future!\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"I appreciate your patience, Ollie! This is a shared thrill and I can't wait for the day when you get to test drive this beauty. For now, let's just enjoy this ride and the exhilarating power of this beast!\"\n\nTurn #13: Oliver Smith said: \"This is absolutely stellar, Sam. The power, the roar, and the adrenaline, it's all wonderful. Just makes you feel alive, doesn't it? Can't wait for our future adventures with this beast!\"\n\nTurn #14: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ollie! There's nothing quite like it, right? Let's look forward to more thrilling adventures with this beauty. For now, let's just soak in this moment and enjoy the roar of this beast!\"\n\nTurn #15: Oliver Smith said: \"That's the plan, Sam. Just you, me, this road, and the roar of this machine. Wonderful times ahead indeed. Loving the moment!\"\n\nTurn #16: Samuel Anderson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Ollie! There's just something about the open road, the roar of the engine - it's exhilarating! I'm glad you're enjoying the ride. This is just the beginning of our thrilling journeys!\"\n\nTurn #17: Oliver Smith said: \"Absolutely, Sam. Nothing compares to the thrill of the open road. Thanks for sharing this exhilarating ride with me. Can't wait for our next road trip!\"\n\nTurn #18: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm glad to share this experience with you, Ollie. It's just a taste of the thrilling rides that the future holds. Let's call it a day for now and rest the beast. Can't wait for our future road trips with this beauty!\"\n\nTurn #19: Oliver Smith said: \"Exactly, it's all about sharing these moments. Thanks again, Sam, for letting me experience this. I'm sure the future rides are going to be even more thrilling. Let's call it a day and let this beauty rest now.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #20. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad you had a good time, Ollie. I can't wait for our future adventures on the road with this beast. For today, let's call it a night and rest. Can't wait for our next ride!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Drive the sports car and show off to friend (Extra information: you are very excited about your new car and can't wait for your friend to see it.)\nOliver Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Oliver! You got to see this new sports car I just got. It's an absolute beast.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Wow, Sam! That's a great car, man. What model is it? And, just out of curiosity, have you taken it for a spin yet?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"It\u2019s a Ferrari F8 Tributo, Ollie! And man, have I taken it for a spin yet? I practically made it fly on the highway! It was so thrilling! I tell you, nothing else can give you quite the same adrenaline rush. Want to hop in for a quick drive, mate?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"That sounds exhilarating, Sam. The F8 Tributo is an extraordinary machine indeed! I'd surely love to experience a drive, only if you're comfortable with it. It's your new ride after all and I completely understand if you're not willing to let anyone behind the wheel just yet.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oh Ollie, I'd be thrilled for you to experience it. After all, what's the use of a thrill if you can't share it with a friend? Come on, check to see if your seat belt fits, I'll show you how this beast roars on the road!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Drive the sports car and show off to friend (Extra information: you are very excited about your new car and can't wait for your friend to see it.)\nOliver Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Oliver! You got to see this new sports car I just got. It's an absolute beast.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Wow, Sam! That's a great car, man. What model is it? And, just out of curiosity, have you taken it for a spin yet?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"It\u2019s a Ferrari F8 Tributo, Ollie! And man, have I taken it for a spin yet? I practically made it fly on the highway! It was so thrilling! I tell you, nothing else can give you quite the same adrenaline rush. Want to hop in for a quick drive, mate?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"That sounds exhilarating, Sam. The F8 Tributo is an extraordinary machine indeed! I'd surely love to experience a drive, only if you're comfortable with it. It's your new ride after all and I completely understand if you're not willing to let anyone behind the wheel just yet.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oh Ollie, I'd be thrilled for you to experience it. After all, what's the use of a thrill if you can't share it with a friend? Come on, check to see if your seat belt fits, I'll show you how this beast roars on the road!\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Smith said: \"I'm truly grateful for this, Sam. It feels great to share in this thrill with you. Buckled up and ready to experience the ride in this beauty!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'action', 'argument': '[action] Starts the engine of the sports car and drives off smoothly with Oliver.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Drive the sports car and show off to friend (Extra information: you are very excited about your new car and can't wait for your friend to see it.)\nOliver Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Oliver! You got to see this new sports car I just got. It's an absolute beast.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Wow, Sam! That's a great car, man. What model is it? And, just out of curiosity, have you taken it for a spin yet?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"It\u2019s a Ferrari F8 Tributo, Ollie! And man, have I taken it for a spin yet? I practically made it fly on the highway! It was so thrilling! I tell you, nothing else can give you quite the same adrenaline rush. Want to hop in for a quick drive, mate?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"That sounds exhilarating, Sam. The F8 Tributo is an extraordinary machine indeed! I'd surely love to experience a drive, only if you're comfortable with it. It's your new ride after all and I completely understand if you're not willing to let anyone behind the wheel just yet.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oh Ollie, I'd be thrilled for you to experience it. After all, what's the use of a thrill if you can't share it with a friend? Come on, check to see if your seat belt fits, I'll show you how this beast roars on the road!\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Smith said: \"I'm truly grateful for this, Sam. It feels great to share in this thrill with you. Buckled up and ready to experience the ride in this beauty!\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson [action] Starts the engine of the sports car and drives off smoothly with Oliver.\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Smith said: \"Sam, this is just incredible! The power, the sound, it's just like you said, a real adrenaline rush. Thanks for letting me have this experience.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad you're enjoying it, Ollie! There's something about the sound of a roaring engine that just gets the adrenaline pumping. This is just the first of many rides, mate!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Drive the sports car and show off to friend (Extra information: you are very excited about your new car and can't wait for your friend to see it.)\nOliver Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Oliver! You got to see this new sports car I just got. It's an absolute beast.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Wow, Sam! That's a great car, man. What model is it? And, just out of curiosity, have you taken it for a spin yet?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"It\u2019s a Ferrari F8 Tributo, Ollie! And man, have I taken it for a spin yet? I practically made it fly on the highway! It was so thrilling! I tell you, nothing else can give you quite the same adrenaline rush. Want to hop in for a quick drive, mate?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"That sounds exhilarating, Sam. The F8 Tributo is an extraordinary machine indeed! I'd surely love to experience a drive, only if you're comfortable with it. It's your new ride after all and I completely understand if you're not willing to let anyone behind the wheel just yet.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oh Ollie, I'd be thrilled for you to experience it. After all, what's the use of a thrill if you can't share it with a friend? Come on, check to see if your seat belt fits, I'll show you how this beast roars on the road!\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Smith said: \"I'm truly grateful for this, Sam. It feels great to share in this thrill with you. Buckled up and ready to experience the ride in this beauty!\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson [action] Starts the engine of the sports car and drives off smoothly with Oliver.\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Smith said: \"Sam, this is just incredible! The power, the sound, it's just like you said, a real adrenaline rush. Thanks for letting me have this experience.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm glad you're enjoying it, Ollie! There's something about the sound of a roaring engine that just gets the adrenaline pumping. This is just the first of many rides, mate!\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Smith said: \"That's a true ride brother! Any chance you'd allow me to drive this beauty in the future? Of course, once you're okay with the thought of someone else behind the wheels!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Of course, Ollie! But only after I've had my fill. This beast and I have to bond a little more before anyone else takes the wheel. But I promise, mate, your day will come!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Drive the sports car and show off to friend (Extra information: you are very excited about your new car and can't wait for your friend to see it.)\nOliver Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Oliver! You got to see this new sports car I just got. It's an absolute beast.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Wow, Sam! That's a great car, man. What model is it? And, just out of curiosity, have you taken it for a spin yet?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"It\u2019s a Ferrari F8 Tributo, Ollie! And man, have I taken it for a spin yet? I practically made it fly on the highway! It was so thrilling! I tell you, nothing else can give you quite the same adrenaline rush. Want to hop in for a quick drive, mate?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"That sounds exhilarating, Sam. The F8 Tributo is an extraordinary machine indeed! I'd surely love to experience a drive, only if you're comfortable with it. It's your new ride after all and I completely understand if you're not willing to let anyone behind the wheel just yet.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oh Ollie, I'd be thrilled for you to experience it. After all, what's the use of a thrill if you can't share it with a friend? Come on, check to see if your seat belt fits, I'll show you how this beast roars on the road!\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Smith said: \"I'm truly grateful for this, Sam. It feels great to share in this thrill with you. Buckled up and ready to experience the ride in this beauty!\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson [action] Starts the engine of the sports car and drives off smoothly with Oliver.\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Smith said: \"Sam, this is just incredible! The power, the sound, it's just like you said, a real adrenaline rush. Thanks for letting me have this experience.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm glad you're enjoying it, Ollie! There's something about the sound of a roaring engine that just gets the adrenaline pumping. This is just the first of many rides, mate!\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Smith said: \"That's a true ride brother! Any chance you'd allow me to drive this beauty in the future? Of course, once you're okay with the thought of someone else behind the wheels!\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Of course, Ollie! But only after I've had my fill. This beast and I have to bond a little more before anyone else takes the wheel. But I promise, mate, your day will come!\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Smith said: \"That sounds fair, Sam. Take your time and enjoy the thrill of your new ride. I'm just happy to be able to share this experience with you. And I'm already looking forward to my turn at the wheel in the future!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I appreciate your patience, Ollie! This is a shared thrill and I can't wait for the day when you get to test drive this beauty. For now, let's just enjoy this ride and the exhilarating power of this beast!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Drive the sports car and show off to friend (Extra information: you are very excited about your new car and can't wait for your friend to see it.)\nOliver Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Oliver! You got to see this new sports car I just got. It's an absolute beast.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Wow, Sam! That's a great car, man. What model is it? And, just out of curiosity, have you taken it for a spin yet?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"It\u2019s a Ferrari F8 Tributo, Ollie! And man, have I taken it for a spin yet? I practically made it fly on the highway! It was so thrilling! I tell you, nothing else can give you quite the same adrenaline rush. Want to hop in for a quick drive, mate?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"That sounds exhilarating, Sam. The F8 Tributo is an extraordinary machine indeed! I'd surely love to experience a drive, only if you're comfortable with it. It's your new ride after all and I completely understand if you're not willing to let anyone behind the wheel just yet.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oh Ollie, I'd be thrilled for you to experience it. After all, what's the use of a thrill if you can't share it with a friend? Come on, check to see if your seat belt fits, I'll show you how this beast roars on the road!\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Smith said: \"I'm truly grateful for this, Sam. It feels great to share in this thrill with you. Buckled up and ready to experience the ride in this beauty!\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson [action] Starts the engine of the sports car and drives off smoothly with Oliver.\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Smith said: \"Sam, this is just incredible! The power, the sound, it's just like you said, a real adrenaline rush. Thanks for letting me have this experience.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm glad you're enjoying it, Ollie! There's something about the sound of a roaring engine that just gets the adrenaline pumping. This is just the first of many rides, mate!\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Smith said: \"That's a true ride brother! Any chance you'd allow me to drive this beauty in the future? Of course, once you're okay with the thought of someone else behind the wheels!\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Of course, Ollie! But only after I've had my fill. This beast and I have to bond a little more before anyone else takes the wheel. But I promise, mate, your day will come!\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Smith said: \"That sounds fair, Sam. Take your time and enjoy the thrill of your new ride. I'm just happy to be able to share this experience with you. And I'm already looking forward to my turn at the wheel in the future!\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"I appreciate your patience, Ollie! This is a shared thrill and I can't wait for the day when you get to test drive this beauty. For now, let's just enjoy this ride and the exhilarating power of this beast!\"\n\nTurn #13: Oliver Smith said: \"This is absolutely stellar, Sam. The power, the roar, and the adrenaline, it's all wonderful. Just makes you feel alive, doesn't it? Can't wait for our future adventures with this beast!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Ollie! There's nothing quite like it, right? Let's look forward to more thrilling adventures with this beauty. For now, let's just soak in this moment and enjoy the roar of this beast!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Drive the sports car and show off to friend (Extra information: you are very excited about your new car and can't wait for your friend to see it.)\nOliver Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Oliver! You got to see this new sports car I just got. It's an absolute beast.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Wow, Sam! That's a great car, man. What model is it? And, just out of curiosity, have you taken it for a spin yet?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"It\u2019s a Ferrari F8 Tributo, Ollie! And man, have I taken it for a spin yet? I practically made it fly on the highway! It was so thrilling! I tell you, nothing else can give you quite the same adrenaline rush. Want to hop in for a quick drive, mate?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"That sounds exhilarating, Sam. The F8 Tributo is an extraordinary machine indeed! I'd surely love to experience a drive, only if you're comfortable with it. It's your new ride after all and I completely understand if you're not willing to let anyone behind the wheel just yet.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oh Ollie, I'd be thrilled for you to experience it. After all, what's the use of a thrill if you can't share it with a friend? Come on, check to see if your seat belt fits, I'll show you how this beast roars on the road!\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Smith said: \"I'm truly grateful for this, Sam. It feels great to share in this thrill with you. Buckled up and ready to experience the ride in this beauty!\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson [action] Starts the engine of the sports car and drives off smoothly with Oliver.\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Smith said: \"Sam, this is just incredible! The power, the sound, it's just like you said, a real adrenaline rush. Thanks for letting me have this experience.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm glad you're enjoying it, Ollie! There's something about the sound of a roaring engine that just gets the adrenaline pumping. This is just the first of many rides, mate!\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Smith said: \"That's a true ride brother! Any chance you'd allow me to drive this beauty in the future? Of course, once you're okay with the thought of someone else behind the wheels!\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Of course, Ollie! But only after I've had my fill. This beast and I have to bond a little more before anyone else takes the wheel. But I promise, mate, your day will come!\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Smith said: \"That sounds fair, Sam. Take your time and enjoy the thrill of your new ride. I'm just happy to be able to share this experience with you. And I'm already looking forward to my turn at the wheel in the future!\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"I appreciate your patience, Ollie! This is a shared thrill and I can't wait for the day when you get to test drive this beauty. For now, let's just enjoy this ride and the exhilarating power of this beast!\"\n\nTurn #13: Oliver Smith said: \"This is absolutely stellar, Sam. The power, the roar, and the adrenaline, it's all wonderful. Just makes you feel alive, doesn't it? Can't wait for our future adventures with this beast!\"\n\nTurn #14: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ollie! There's nothing quite like it, right? Let's look forward to more thrilling adventures with this beauty. For now, let's just soak in this moment and enjoy the roar of this beast!\"\n\nTurn #15: Oliver Smith said: \"That's the plan, Sam. Just you, me, this road, and the roar of this machine. Wonderful times ahead indeed. Loving the moment!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn't agree more, Ollie! There's just something about the open road, the roar of the engine - it's exhilarating! I'm glad you're enjoying the ride. This is just the beginning of our thrilling journeys!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Drive the sports car and show off to friend (Extra information: you are very excited about your new car and can't wait for your friend to see it.)\nOliver Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Oliver! You got to see this new sports car I just got. It's an absolute beast.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Wow, Sam! That's a great car, man. What model is it? And, just out of curiosity, have you taken it for a spin yet?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"It\u2019s a Ferrari F8 Tributo, Ollie! And man, have I taken it for a spin yet? I practically made it fly on the highway! It was so thrilling! I tell you, nothing else can give you quite the same adrenaline rush. Want to hop in for a quick drive, mate?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"That sounds exhilarating, Sam. The F8 Tributo is an extraordinary machine indeed! I'd surely love to experience a drive, only if you're comfortable with it. It's your new ride after all and I completely understand if you're not willing to let anyone behind the wheel just yet.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oh Ollie, I'd be thrilled for you to experience it. After all, what's the use of a thrill if you can't share it with a friend? Come on, check to see if your seat belt fits, I'll show you how this beast roars on the road!\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Smith said: \"I'm truly grateful for this, Sam. It feels great to share in this thrill with you. Buckled up and ready to experience the ride in this beauty!\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson [action] Starts the engine of the sports car and drives off smoothly with Oliver.\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Smith said: \"Sam, this is just incredible! The power, the sound, it's just like you said, a real adrenaline rush. Thanks for letting me have this experience.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm glad you're enjoying it, Ollie! There's something about the sound of a roaring engine that just gets the adrenaline pumping. This is just the first of many rides, mate!\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Smith said: \"That's a true ride brother! Any chance you'd allow me to drive this beauty in the future? Of course, once you're okay with the thought of someone else behind the wheels!\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Of course, Ollie! But only after I've had my fill. This beast and I have to bond a little more before anyone else takes the wheel. But I promise, mate, your day will come!\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Smith said: \"That sounds fair, Sam. Take your time and enjoy the thrill of your new ride. I'm just happy to be able to share this experience with you. And I'm already looking forward to my turn at the wheel in the future!\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"I appreciate your patience, Ollie! This is a shared thrill and I can't wait for the day when you get to test drive this beauty. For now, let's just enjoy this ride and the exhilarating power of this beast!\"\n\nTurn #13: Oliver Smith said: \"This is absolutely stellar, Sam. The power, the roar, and the adrenaline, it's all wonderful. Just makes you feel alive, doesn't it? Can't wait for our future adventures with this beast!\"\n\nTurn #14: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ollie! There's nothing quite like it, right? Let's look forward to more thrilling adventures with this beauty. For now, let's just soak in this moment and enjoy the roar of this beast!\"\n\nTurn #15: Oliver Smith said: \"That's the plan, Sam. Just you, me, this road, and the roar of this machine. Wonderful times ahead indeed. Loving the moment!\"\n\nTurn #16: Samuel Anderson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Ollie! There's just something about the open road, the roar of the engine - it's exhilarating! I'm glad you're enjoying the ride. This is just the beginning of our thrilling journeys!\"\n\nTurn #17: Oliver Smith said: \"Absolutely, Sam. Nothing compares to the thrill of the open road. Thanks for sharing this exhilarating ride with me. Can't wait for our next road trip!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #18. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad to share this experience with you, Ollie. It's just a taste of the thrilling rides that the future holds. Let's call it a day for now and rest the beast. Can't wait for our future road trips with this beauty!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Smith, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Smith would, keeping in mind Oliver Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. Oliver's secrets: He loves gardening and has a secret greenhouse.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nOliver Smith's goal: You want to drive the new sports car but also respect your friend's feelings (Extra information: you are a car enthusiast and have been dreaming to drive a sports car, but you also don't want to make your friend feel uncomfortable)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Oliver! You got to see this new sports car I just got. It's an absolute beast.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Wow, Sam! That's a great car, man. What model is it? And, just out of curiosity, have you taken it for a spin yet?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Smith, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Smith would, keeping in mind Oliver Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. Oliver's secrets: He loves gardening and has a secret greenhouse.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nOliver Smith's goal: You want to drive the new sports car but also respect your friend's feelings (Extra information: you are a car enthusiast and have been dreaming to drive a sports car, but you also don't want to make your friend feel uncomfortable)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Oliver! You got to see this new sports car I just got. It's an absolute beast.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Wow, Sam! That's a great car, man. What model is it? And, just out of curiosity, have you taken it for a spin yet?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"It\u2019s a Ferrari F8 Tributo, Ollie! And man, have I taken it for a spin yet? I practically made it fly on the highway! It was so thrilling! I tell you, nothing else can give you quite the same adrenaline rush. Want to hop in for a quick drive, mate?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds exhilarating, Sam. The F8 Tributo is an extraordinary machine indeed! I'd surely love to experience a drive, only if you're comfortable with it. It's your new ride after all and I completely understand if you're not willing to let anyone behind the wheel just yet.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Smith, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Smith would, keeping in mind Oliver Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. Oliver's secrets: He loves gardening and has a secret greenhouse.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nOliver Smith's goal: You want to drive the new sports car but also respect your friend's feelings (Extra information: you are a car enthusiast and have been dreaming to drive a sports car, but you also don't want to make your friend feel uncomfortable)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Oliver! You got to see this new sports car I just got. It's an absolute beast.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Wow, Sam! That's a great car, man. What model is it? And, just out of curiosity, have you taken it for a spin yet?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"It\u2019s a Ferrari F8 Tributo, Ollie! And man, have I taken it for a spin yet? I practically made it fly on the highway! It was so thrilling! I tell you, nothing else can give you quite the same adrenaline rush. Want to hop in for a quick drive, mate?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"That sounds exhilarating, Sam. The F8 Tributo is an extraordinary machine indeed! I'd surely love to experience a drive, only if you're comfortable with it. It's your new ride after all and I completely understand if you're not willing to let anyone behind the wheel just yet.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oh Ollie, I'd be thrilled for you to experience it. After all, what's the use of a thrill if you can't share it with a friend? Come on, check to see if your seat belt fits, I'll show you how this beast roars on the road!\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Smith said: \"I'm truly grateful for this, Sam. It feels great to share in this thrill with you. Buckled up and ready to experience the ride in this beauty!\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson [action] Starts the engine of the sports car and drives off smoothly with Oliver.\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Smith said: \"Sam, this is just incredible! The power, the sound, it's just like you said, a real adrenaline rush. Thanks for letting me have this experience.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm glad you're enjoying it, Ollie! There's something about the sound of a roaring engine that just gets the adrenaline pumping. This is just the first of many rides, mate!\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Smith said: \"That's a true ride brother! Any chance you'd allow me to drive this beauty in the future? Of course, once you're okay with the thought of someone else behind the wheels!\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Of course, Ollie! But only after I've had my fill. This beast and I have to bond a little more before anyone else takes the wheel. But I promise, mate, your day will come!\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Smith said: \"That sounds fair, Sam. Take your time and enjoy the thrill of your new ride. I'm just happy to be able to share this experience with you. And I'm already looking forward to my turn at the wheel in the future!\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"I appreciate your patience, Ollie! This is a shared thrill and I can't wait for the day when you get to test drive this beauty. For now, let's just enjoy this ride and the exhilarating power of this beast!\"\n\nTurn #13: Oliver Smith said: \"This is absolutely stellar, Sam. The power, the roar, and the adrenaline, it's all wonderful. Just makes you feel alive, doesn't it? Can't wait for our future adventures with this beast!\"\n\nTurn #14: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ollie! There's nothing quite like it, right? Let's look forward to more thrilling adventures with this beauty. For now, let's just soak in this moment and enjoy the roar of this beast!\"\n\nTurn #15: Oliver Smith said: \"That's the plan, Sam. Just you, me, this road, and the roar of this machine. Wonderful times ahead indeed. Loving the moment!\"\n\nTurn #16: Samuel Anderson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Ollie! There's just something about the open road, the roar of the engine - it's exhilarating! I'm glad you're enjoying the ride. This is just the beginning of our thrilling journeys!\"\n\nTurn #17: Oliver Smith said: \"Absolutely, Sam. Nothing compares to the thrill of the open road. Thanks for sharing this exhilarating ride with me. Can't wait for our next road trip!\"\n\nTurn #18: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm glad to share this experience with you, Ollie. It's just a taste of the thrilling rides that the future holds. Let's call it a day for now and rest the beast. Can't wait for our future road trips with this beauty!\"\n\nTurn #19: Oliver Smith said: \"Exactly, it's all about sharing these moments. Thanks again, Sam, for letting me experience this. I'm sure the future rides are going to be even more thrilling. Let's call it a day and let this beauty rest now.\"\n\nTurn #20: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm glad you had a good time, Ollie. I can't wait for our future adventures on the road with this beast. For today, let's call it a night and rest. Can't wait for our next ride!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #21. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Smith, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Smith would, keeping in mind Oliver Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. Oliver's secrets: He loves gardening and has a secret greenhouse.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nOliver Smith's goal: You want to drive the new sports car but also respect your friend's feelings (Extra information: you are a car enthusiast and have been dreaming to drive a sports car, but you also don't want to make your friend feel uncomfortable)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Oliver! You got to see this new sports car I just got. It's an absolute beast.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Wow, Sam! That's a great car, man. What model is it? And, just out of curiosity, have you taken it for a spin yet?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"It\u2019s a Ferrari F8 Tributo, Ollie! And man, have I taken it for a spin yet? I practically made it fly on the highway! It was so thrilling! I tell you, nothing else can give you quite the same adrenaline rush. Want to hop in for a quick drive, mate?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"That sounds exhilarating, Sam. The F8 Tributo is an extraordinary machine indeed! I'd surely love to experience a drive, only if you're comfortable with it. It's your new ride after all and I completely understand if you're not willing to let anyone behind the wheel just yet.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oh Ollie, I'd be thrilled for you to experience it. After all, what's the use of a thrill if you can't share it with a friend? Come on, check to see if your seat belt fits, I'll show you how this beast roars on the road!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm truly grateful for this, Sam. It feels great to share in this thrill with you. Buckled up and ready to experience the ride in this beauty!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Smith, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Smith would, keeping in mind Oliver Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. Oliver's secrets: He loves gardening and has a secret greenhouse.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nOliver Smith's goal: You want to drive the new sports car but also respect your friend's feelings (Extra information: you are a car enthusiast and have been dreaming to drive a sports car, but you also don't want to make your friend feel uncomfortable)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Oliver! You got to see this new sports car I just got. It's an absolute beast.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Wow, Sam! That's a great car, man. What model is it? And, just out of curiosity, have you taken it for a spin yet?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"It\u2019s a Ferrari F8 Tributo, Ollie! And man, have I taken it for a spin yet? I practically made it fly on the highway! It was so thrilling! I tell you, nothing else can give you quite the same adrenaline rush. Want to hop in for a quick drive, mate?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"That sounds exhilarating, Sam. The F8 Tributo is an extraordinary machine indeed! I'd surely love to experience a drive, only if you're comfortable with it. It's your new ride after all and I completely understand if you're not willing to let anyone behind the wheel just yet.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oh Ollie, I'd be thrilled for you to experience it. After all, what's the use of a thrill if you can't share it with a friend? Come on, check to see if your seat belt fits, I'll show you how this beast roars on the road!\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Smith said: \"I'm truly grateful for this, Sam. It feels great to share in this thrill with you. Buckled up and ready to experience the ride in this beauty!\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson [action] Starts the engine of the sports car and drives off smoothly with Oliver.\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sam, this is just incredible! The power, the sound, it's just like you said, a real adrenaline rush. Thanks for letting me have this experience.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Smith, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Smith would, keeping in mind Oliver Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. Oliver's secrets: He loves gardening and has a secret greenhouse.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nOliver Smith's goal: You want to drive the new sports car but also respect your friend's feelings (Extra information: you are a car enthusiast and have been dreaming to drive a sports car, but you also don't want to make your friend feel uncomfortable)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Oliver! You got to see this new sports car I just got. It's an absolute beast.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Wow, Sam! That's a great car, man. What model is it? And, just out of curiosity, have you taken it for a spin yet?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"It\u2019s a Ferrari F8 Tributo, Ollie! And man, have I taken it for a spin yet? I practically made it fly on the highway! It was so thrilling! I tell you, nothing else can give you quite the same adrenaline rush. Want to hop in for a quick drive, mate?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"That sounds exhilarating, Sam. The F8 Tributo is an extraordinary machine indeed! I'd surely love to experience a drive, only if you're comfortable with it. It's your new ride after all and I completely understand if you're not willing to let anyone behind the wheel just yet.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oh Ollie, I'd be thrilled for you to experience it. After all, what's the use of a thrill if you can't share it with a friend? Come on, check to see if your seat belt fits, I'll show you how this beast roars on the road!\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Smith said: \"I'm truly grateful for this, Sam. It feels great to share in this thrill with you. Buckled up and ready to experience the ride in this beauty!\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson [action] Starts the engine of the sports car and drives off smoothly with Oliver.\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Smith said: \"Sam, this is just incredible! The power, the sound, it's just like you said, a real adrenaline rush. Thanks for letting me have this experience.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm glad you're enjoying it, Ollie! There's something about the sound of a roaring engine that just gets the adrenaline pumping. This is just the first of many rides, mate!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's a true ride brother! Any chance you'd allow me to drive this beauty in the future? Of course, once you're okay with the thought of someone else behind the wheels!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Smith, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Smith would, keeping in mind Oliver Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. Oliver's secrets: He loves gardening and has a secret greenhouse.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nOliver Smith's goal: You want to drive the new sports car but also respect your friend's feelings (Extra information: you are a car enthusiast and have been dreaming to drive a sports car, but you also don't want to make your friend feel uncomfortable)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Oliver! You got to see this new sports car I just got. It's an absolute beast.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Wow, Sam! That's a great car, man. What model is it? And, just out of curiosity, have you taken it for a spin yet?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"It\u2019s a Ferrari F8 Tributo, Ollie! And man, have I taken it for a spin yet? I practically made it fly on the highway! It was so thrilling! I tell you, nothing else can give you quite the same adrenaline rush. Want to hop in for a quick drive, mate?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"That sounds exhilarating, Sam. The F8 Tributo is an extraordinary machine indeed! I'd surely love to experience a drive, only if you're comfortable with it. It's your new ride after all and I completely understand if you're not willing to let anyone behind the wheel just yet.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oh Ollie, I'd be thrilled for you to experience it. After all, what's the use of a thrill if you can't share it with a friend? Come on, check to see if your seat belt fits, I'll show you how this beast roars on the road!\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Smith said: \"I'm truly grateful for this, Sam. It feels great to share in this thrill with you. Buckled up and ready to experience the ride in this beauty!\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson [action] Starts the engine of the sports car and drives off smoothly with Oliver.\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Smith said: \"Sam, this is just incredible! The power, the sound, it's just like you said, a real adrenaline rush. Thanks for letting me have this experience.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm glad you're enjoying it, Ollie! There's something about the sound of a roaring engine that just gets the adrenaline pumping. This is just the first of many rides, mate!\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Smith said: \"That's a true ride brother! Any chance you'd allow me to drive this beauty in the future? Of course, once you're okay with the thought of someone else behind the wheels!\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Of course, Ollie! But only after I've had my fill. This beast and I have to bond a little more before anyone else takes the wheel. But I promise, mate, your day will come!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds fair, Sam. Take your time and enjoy the thrill of your new ride. I'm just happy to be able to share this experience with you. And I'm already looking forward to my turn at the wheel in the future!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Smith, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Smith would, keeping in mind Oliver Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. Oliver's secrets: He loves gardening and has a secret greenhouse.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nOliver Smith's goal: You want to drive the new sports car but also respect your friend's feelings (Extra information: you are a car enthusiast and have been dreaming to drive a sports car, but you also don't want to make your friend feel uncomfortable)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Oliver! You got to see this new sports car I just got. It's an absolute beast.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Wow, Sam! That's a great car, man. What model is it? And, just out of curiosity, have you taken it for a spin yet?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"It\u2019s a Ferrari F8 Tributo, Ollie! And man, have I taken it for a spin yet? I practically made it fly on the highway! It was so thrilling! I tell you, nothing else can give you quite the same adrenaline rush. Want to hop in for a quick drive, mate?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"That sounds exhilarating, Sam. The F8 Tributo is an extraordinary machine indeed! I'd surely love to experience a drive, only if you're comfortable with it. It's your new ride after all and I completely understand if you're not willing to let anyone behind the wheel just yet.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oh Ollie, I'd be thrilled for you to experience it. After all, what's the use of a thrill if you can't share it with a friend? Come on, check to see if your seat belt fits, I'll show you how this beast roars on the road!\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Smith said: \"I'm truly grateful for this, Sam. It feels great to share in this thrill with you. Buckled up and ready to experience the ride in this beauty!\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson [action] Starts the engine of the sports car and drives off smoothly with Oliver.\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Smith said: \"Sam, this is just incredible! The power, the sound, it's just like you said, a real adrenaline rush. Thanks for letting me have this experience.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm glad you're enjoying it, Ollie! There's something about the sound of a roaring engine that just gets the adrenaline pumping. This is just the first of many rides, mate!\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Smith said: \"That's a true ride brother! Any chance you'd allow me to drive this beauty in the future? Of course, once you're okay with the thought of someone else behind the wheels!\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Of course, Ollie! But only after I've had my fill. This beast and I have to bond a little more before anyone else takes the wheel. But I promise, mate, your day will come!\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Smith said: \"That sounds fair, Sam. Take your time and enjoy the thrill of your new ride. I'm just happy to be able to share this experience with you. And I'm already looking forward to my turn at the wheel in the future!\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"I appreciate your patience, Ollie! This is a shared thrill and I can't wait for the day when you get to test drive this beauty. For now, let's just enjoy this ride and the exhilarating power of this beast!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"This is absolutely stellar, Sam. The power, the roar, and the adrenaline, it's all wonderful. Just makes you feel alive, doesn't it? Can't wait for our future adventures with this beast!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Smith, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Smith would, keeping in mind Oliver Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. Oliver's secrets: He loves gardening and has a secret greenhouse.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nOliver Smith's goal: You want to drive the new sports car but also respect your friend's feelings (Extra information: you are a car enthusiast and have been dreaming to drive a sports car, but you also don't want to make your friend feel uncomfortable)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Oliver! You got to see this new sports car I just got. It's an absolute beast.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Wow, Sam! That's a great car, man. What model is it? And, just out of curiosity, have you taken it for a spin yet?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"It\u2019s a Ferrari F8 Tributo, Ollie! And man, have I taken it for a spin yet? I practically made it fly on the highway! It was so thrilling! I tell you, nothing else can give you quite the same adrenaline rush. Want to hop in for a quick drive, mate?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"That sounds exhilarating, Sam. The F8 Tributo is an extraordinary machine indeed! I'd surely love to experience a drive, only if you're comfortable with it. It's your new ride after all and I completely understand if you're not willing to let anyone behind the wheel just yet.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oh Ollie, I'd be thrilled for you to experience it. After all, what's the use of a thrill if you can't share it with a friend? Come on, check to see if your seat belt fits, I'll show you how this beast roars on the road!\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Smith said: \"I'm truly grateful for this, Sam. It feels great to share in this thrill with you. Buckled up and ready to experience the ride in this beauty!\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson [action] Starts the engine of the sports car and drives off smoothly with Oliver.\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Smith said: \"Sam, this is just incredible! The power, the sound, it's just like you said, a real adrenaline rush. Thanks for letting me have this experience.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm glad you're enjoying it, Ollie! There's something about the sound of a roaring engine that just gets the adrenaline pumping. This is just the first of many rides, mate!\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Smith said: \"That's a true ride brother! Any chance you'd allow me to drive this beauty in the future? Of course, once you're okay with the thought of someone else behind the wheels!\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Of course, Ollie! But only after I've had my fill. This beast and I have to bond a little more before anyone else takes the wheel. But I promise, mate, your day will come!\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Smith said: \"That sounds fair, Sam. Take your time and enjoy the thrill of your new ride. I'm just happy to be able to share this experience with you. And I'm already looking forward to my turn at the wheel in the future!\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"I appreciate your patience, Ollie! This is a shared thrill and I can't wait for the day when you get to test drive this beauty. For now, let's just enjoy this ride and the exhilarating power of this beast!\"\n\nTurn #13: Oliver Smith said: \"This is absolutely stellar, Sam. The power, the roar, and the adrenaline, it's all wonderful. Just makes you feel alive, doesn't it? Can't wait for our future adventures with this beast!\"\n\nTurn #14: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ollie! There's nothing quite like it, right? Let's look forward to more thrilling adventures with this beauty. For now, let's just soak in this moment and enjoy the roar of this beast!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's the plan, Sam. Just you, me, this road, and the roar of this machine. Wonderful times ahead indeed. Loving the moment!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Smith, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Smith would, keeping in mind Oliver Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. Oliver's secrets: He loves gardening and has a secret greenhouse.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nOliver Smith's goal: You want to drive the new sports car but also respect your friend's feelings (Extra information: you are a car enthusiast and have been dreaming to drive a sports car, but you also don't want to make your friend feel uncomfortable)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Oliver! You got to see this new sports car I just got. It's an absolute beast.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Wow, Sam! That's a great car, man. What model is it? And, just out of curiosity, have you taken it for a spin yet?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"It\u2019s a Ferrari F8 Tributo, Ollie! And man, have I taken it for a spin yet? I practically made it fly on the highway! It was so thrilling! I tell you, nothing else can give you quite the same adrenaline rush. Want to hop in for a quick drive, mate?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"That sounds exhilarating, Sam. The F8 Tributo is an extraordinary machine indeed! I'd surely love to experience a drive, only if you're comfortable with it. It's your new ride after all and I completely understand if you're not willing to let anyone behind the wheel just yet.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oh Ollie, I'd be thrilled for you to experience it. After all, what's the use of a thrill if you can't share it with a friend? Come on, check to see if your seat belt fits, I'll show you how this beast roars on the road!\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Smith said: \"I'm truly grateful for this, Sam. It feels great to share in this thrill with you. Buckled up and ready to experience the ride in this beauty!\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson [action] Starts the engine of the sports car and drives off smoothly with Oliver.\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Smith said: \"Sam, this is just incredible! The power, the sound, it's just like you said, a real adrenaline rush. Thanks for letting me have this experience.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm glad you're enjoying it, Ollie! There's something about the sound of a roaring engine that just gets the adrenaline pumping. This is just the first of many rides, mate!\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Smith said: \"That's a true ride brother! Any chance you'd allow me to drive this beauty in the future? Of course, once you're okay with the thought of someone else behind the wheels!\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Of course, Ollie! But only after I've had my fill. This beast and I have to bond a little more before anyone else takes the wheel. But I promise, mate, your day will come!\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Smith said: \"That sounds fair, Sam. Take your time and enjoy the thrill of your new ride. I'm just happy to be able to share this experience with you. And I'm already looking forward to my turn at the wheel in the future!\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"I appreciate your patience, Ollie! This is a shared thrill and I can't wait for the day when you get to test drive this beauty. For now, let's just enjoy this ride and the exhilarating power of this beast!\"\n\nTurn #13: Oliver Smith said: \"This is absolutely stellar, Sam. The power, the roar, and the adrenaline, it's all wonderful. Just makes you feel alive, doesn't it? Can't wait for our future adventures with this beast!\"\n\nTurn #14: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ollie! There's nothing quite like it, right? Let's look forward to more thrilling adventures with this beauty. For now, let's just soak in this moment and enjoy the roar of this beast!\"\n\nTurn #15: Oliver Smith said: \"That's the plan, Sam. Just you, me, this road, and the roar of this machine. Wonderful times ahead indeed. Loving the moment!\"\n\nTurn #16: Samuel Anderson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Ollie! There's just something about the open road, the roar of the engine - it's exhilarating! I'm glad you're enjoying the ride. This is just the beginning of our thrilling journeys!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Sam. Nothing compares to the thrill of the open road. Thanks for sharing this exhilarating ride with me. Can't wait for our next road trip!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Smith, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Smith would, keeping in mind Oliver Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. Oliver's secrets: He loves gardening and has a secret greenhouse.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nOliver Smith's goal: You want to drive the new sports car but also respect your friend's feelings (Extra information: you are a car enthusiast and have been dreaming to drive a sports car, but you also don't want to make your friend feel uncomfortable)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Oliver! You got to see this new sports car I just got. It's an absolute beast.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Wow, Sam! That's a great car, man. What model is it? And, just out of curiosity, have you taken it for a spin yet?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"It\u2019s a Ferrari F8 Tributo, Ollie! And man, have I taken it for a spin yet? I practically made it fly on the highway! It was so thrilling! I tell you, nothing else can give you quite the same adrenaline rush. Want to hop in for a quick drive, mate?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"That sounds exhilarating, Sam. The F8 Tributo is an extraordinary machine indeed! I'd surely love to experience a drive, only if you're comfortable with it. It's your new ride after all and I completely understand if you're not willing to let anyone behind the wheel just yet.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oh Ollie, I'd be thrilled for you to experience it. After all, what's the use of a thrill if you can't share it with a friend? Come on, check to see if your seat belt fits, I'll show you how this beast roars on the road!\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Smith said: \"I'm truly grateful for this, Sam. It feels great to share in this thrill with you. Buckled up and ready to experience the ride in this beauty!\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson [action] Starts the engine of the sports car and drives off smoothly with Oliver.\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Smith said: \"Sam, this is just incredible! The power, the sound, it's just like you said, a real adrenaline rush. Thanks for letting me have this experience.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm glad you're enjoying it, Ollie! There's something about the sound of a roaring engine that just gets the adrenaline pumping. This is just the first of many rides, mate!\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Smith said: \"That's a true ride brother! Any chance you'd allow me to drive this beauty in the future? Of course, once you're okay with the thought of someone else behind the wheels!\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Of course, Ollie! But only after I've had my fill. This beast and I have to bond a little more before anyone else takes the wheel. But I promise, mate, your day will come!\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Smith said: \"That sounds fair, Sam. Take your time and enjoy the thrill of your new ride. I'm just happy to be able to share this experience with you. And I'm already looking forward to my turn at the wheel in the future!\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"I appreciate your patience, Ollie! This is a shared thrill and I can't wait for the day when you get to test drive this beauty. For now, let's just enjoy this ride and the exhilarating power of this beast!\"\n\nTurn #13: Oliver Smith said: \"This is absolutely stellar, Sam. The power, the roar, and the adrenaline, it's all wonderful. Just makes you feel alive, doesn't it? Can't wait for our future adventures with this beast!\"\n\nTurn #14: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ollie! There's nothing quite like it, right? Let's look forward to more thrilling adventures with this beauty. For now, let's just soak in this moment and enjoy the roar of this beast!\"\n\nTurn #15: Oliver Smith said: \"That's the plan, Sam. Just you, me, this road, and the roar of this machine. Wonderful times ahead indeed. Loving the moment!\"\n\nTurn #16: Samuel Anderson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Ollie! There's just something about the open road, the roar of the engine - it's exhilarating! I'm glad you're enjoying the ride. This is just the beginning of our thrilling journeys!\"\n\nTurn #17: Oliver Smith said: \"Absolutely, Sam. Nothing compares to the thrill of the open road. Thanks for sharing this exhilarating ride with me. Can't wait for our next road trip!\"\n\nTurn #18: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm glad to share this experience with you, Ollie. It's just a taste of the thrilling rides that the future holds. Let's call it a day for now and rest the beast. Can't wait for our future road trips with this beauty!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #19. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Exactly, it's all about sharing these moments. Thanks again, Sam, for letting me experience this. I'm sure the future rides are going to be even more thrilling. Let's call it a day and let this beauty rest now.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two inmates are given the chance to chat briefly before one of them is led to the execution chamber for their last meal. They have the opportunity to make a confession that could potentially alter the outcome of their sentences.\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Baxter Sterling\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nBaxter Sterling's background: Baxter Sterling \nHendrick Heinz's goal: Persuade the other inmate to confess (Extra information: confessing to the crime could result in a life sentence instead of execution but the other inmate is unwilling to confess.)\nBaxter Sterling's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Look, Baxter. We all have our secrets, right? But fessing up to them can feel liberating. I never graduated from culinary school, but lied and said I did. It ate at me until I finally admitted it. Doesn't mean it made my food less delicious. Just... made me live more honestly, you know?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two inmates are given the chance to chat briefly before one of them is led to the execution chamber for their last meal. They have the opportunity to make a confession that could potentially alter the outcome of their sentences.\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Baxter Sterling\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nBaxter Sterling's background: Baxter Sterling \nHendrick Heinz's goal: Persuade the other inmate to confess (Extra information: confessing to the crime could result in a life sentence instead of execution but the other inmate is unwilling to confess.)\nBaxter Sterling's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Look, Baxter. We all have our secrets, right? But fessing up to them can feel liberating. I never graduated from culinary school, but lied and said I did. It ate at me until I finally admitted it. Doesn't mean it made my food less delicious. Just... made me live more honestly, you know?\"\n\nTurn #1: Baxter Sterling said: \"You're correct, Hendrick, we all have regrets and secrets. Still, not all of them require confession. The necessity of disclosure depends on the impact on others, I believe. It's impressive you found peace in your honesty, truly. Your culinary skills were never defined by a degree, anyway.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's very philosophic of you, Baxter. But I think the truth often has a ripple effect, touching the lives of others whether we see it or not. The impact may not be immediate or observable, but I think embracing the whole of our actions, the bad along with the good, redefines us. Wouldn't it be better for you to confess? You could be saving a life, even if it's your own.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two inmates are given the chance to chat briefly before one of them is led to the execution chamber for their last meal. They have the opportunity to make a confession that could potentially alter the outcome of their sentences.\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Baxter Sterling\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nBaxter Sterling's background: Baxter Sterling \nHendrick Heinz's goal: Persuade the other inmate to confess (Extra information: confessing to the crime could result in a life sentence instead of execution but the other inmate is unwilling to confess.)\nBaxter Sterling's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Look, Baxter. We all have our secrets, right? But fessing up to them can feel liberating. I never graduated from culinary school, but lied and said I did. It ate at me until I finally admitted it. Doesn't mean it made my food less delicious. Just... made me live more honestly, you know?\"\n\nTurn #1: Baxter Sterling said: \"You're correct, Hendrick, we all have regrets and secrets. Still, not all of them require confession. The necessity of disclosure depends on the impact on others, I believe. It's impressive you found peace in your honesty, truly. Your culinary skills were never defined by a degree, anyway.\"\n\nTurn #2: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's very philosophic of you, Baxter. But I think the truth often has a ripple effect, touching the lives of others whether we see it or not. The impact may not be immediate or observable, but I think embracing the whole of our actions, the bad along with the good, redefines us. Wouldn't it be better for you to confess? You could be saving a life, even if it's your own.\"\n\nTurn #3: Baxter Sterling said: \"Hendrick, I value your perspective, and it\u2019s opened my eyes to deeper shades of truth, no doubt, but in life there are also secrets we hold onto because they're tied to innocence, not guilt. Maybe the dam can break from the weight of unvoiced truths, but it is the turbulent water thus created that'll erode at the very essence of one's spirit. It's not about saving a life, it's about protecting what constitutes a life. And no, I\u2019ve got nothing to confess.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Baxter, I hear your concerns about the turmoil hidden truths can cause. And you're right, some secrets are a protection, a shelter. But think about it this way - it's alright to protect your spirit, but at what cost? Is it worth trading your life for? Evading the storm may bring you temporal peace, but living through it, embracing it and facing it with honesty might give your life a purpose it never had. There is merit in growing through struggles, strength in revealing our most vulnerable selves. And remember, the choice to relieve yourself of this burden could very well mean a longer life for you.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two inmates are given the chance to chat briefly before one of them is led to the execution chamber for their last meal. They have the opportunity to make a confession that could potentially alter the outcome of their sentences.\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Baxter Sterling\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nBaxter Sterling's background: Baxter Sterling \nHendrick Heinz's goal: Persuade the other inmate to confess (Extra information: confessing to the crime could result in a life sentence instead of execution but the other inmate is unwilling to confess.)\nBaxter Sterling's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Look, Baxter. We all have our secrets, right? But fessing up to them can feel liberating. I never graduated from culinary school, but lied and said I did. It ate at me until I finally admitted it. Doesn't mean it made my food less delicious. Just... made me live more honestly, you know?\"\n\nTurn #1: Baxter Sterling said: \"You're correct, Hendrick, we all have regrets and secrets. Still, not all of them require confession. The necessity of disclosure depends on the impact on others, I believe. It's impressive you found peace in your honesty, truly. Your culinary skills were never defined by a degree, anyway.\"\n\nTurn #2: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's very philosophic of you, Baxter. But I think the truth often has a ripple effect, touching the lives of others whether we see it or not. The impact may not be immediate or observable, but I think embracing the whole of our actions, the bad along with the good, redefines us. Wouldn't it be better for you to confess? You could be saving a life, even if it's your own.\"\n\nTurn #3: Baxter Sterling said: \"Hendrick, I value your perspective, and it\u2019s opened my eyes to deeper shades of truth, no doubt, but in life there are also secrets we hold onto because they're tied to innocence, not guilt. Maybe the dam can break from the weight of unvoiced truths, but it is the turbulent water thus created that'll erode at the very essence of one's spirit. It's not about saving a life, it's about protecting what constitutes a life. And no, I\u2019ve got nothing to confess.\"\n\nTurn #4: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Baxter, I hear your concerns about the turmoil hidden truths can cause. And you're right, some secrets are a protection, a shelter. But think about it this way - it's alright to protect your spirit, but at what cost? Is it worth trading your life for? Evading the storm may bring you temporal peace, but living through it, embracing it and facing it with honesty might give your life a purpose it never had. There is merit in growing through struggles, strength in revealing our most vulnerable selves. And remember, the choice to relieve yourself of this burden could very well mean a longer life for you.\"\n\nTurn #5: Baxter Sterling said: \"Once more, that\u2019s eloquently put across, Hendrick. However, truth needs a certain perspective. Clarity and perspective that could differentiate between protecting one's spirit and endangering oneself. The latter is far from my reality and it reinforces my belief in the former. My heart is light, bearing no burden that demands confession. Yes, growth through struggles is significant but struggles don't always stem from malicious secrets. Sometimes, they are born out of standing by what is ethically right or just merely respecting the sanctity of certain events. I maintain, I have nothing to confess.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Baxter, your words carry wisdom, there's no doubt about it. And I can't nor intend to alter the values and beliefs you hold. It might be that you are protecting something or someone with your silence. All I'm suggesting is that your life has significant value. It's not only about ethics, guilt or innocence. Maybe when you face whatever storm you fear head-on, you may see not your spirit erode, but reborn anew in the crystal clear calm after. Your life is worth more than your shackles, don\u2019t let them define you. Just consider it, that's all I ask.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two inmates are given the chance to chat briefly before one of them is led to the execution chamber for their last meal. They have the opportunity to make a confession that could potentially alter the outcome of their sentences.\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Baxter Sterling\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nBaxter Sterling's background: Baxter Sterling \nHendrick Heinz's goal: Persuade the other inmate to confess (Extra information: confessing to the crime could result in a life sentence instead of execution but the other inmate is unwilling to confess.)\nBaxter Sterling's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Look, Baxter. We all have our secrets, right? But fessing up to them can feel liberating. I never graduated from culinary school, but lied and said I did. It ate at me until I finally admitted it. Doesn't mean it made my food less delicious. Just... made me live more honestly, you know?\"\n\nTurn #1: Baxter Sterling said: \"You're correct, Hendrick, we all have regrets and secrets. Still, not all of them require confession. The necessity of disclosure depends on the impact on others, I believe. It's impressive you found peace in your honesty, truly. Your culinary skills were never defined by a degree, anyway.\"\n\nTurn #2: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's very philosophic of you, Baxter. But I think the truth often has a ripple effect, touching the lives of others whether we see it or not. The impact may not be immediate or observable, but I think embracing the whole of our actions, the bad along with the good, redefines us. Wouldn't it be better for you to confess? You could be saving a life, even if it's your own.\"\n\nTurn #3: Baxter Sterling said: \"Hendrick, I value your perspective, and it\u2019s opened my eyes to deeper shades of truth, no doubt, but in life there are also secrets we hold onto because they're tied to innocence, not guilt. Maybe the dam can break from the weight of unvoiced truths, but it is the turbulent water thus created that'll erode at the very essence of one's spirit. It's not about saving a life, it's about protecting what constitutes a life. And no, I\u2019ve got nothing to confess.\"\n\nTurn #4: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Baxter, I hear your concerns about the turmoil hidden truths can cause. And you're right, some secrets are a protection, a shelter. But think about it this way - it's alright to protect your spirit, but at what cost? Is it worth trading your life for? Evading the storm may bring you temporal peace, but living through it, embracing it and facing it with honesty might give your life a purpose it never had. There is merit in growing through struggles, strength in revealing our most vulnerable selves. And remember, the choice to relieve yourself of this burden could very well mean a longer life for you.\"\n\nTurn #5: Baxter Sterling said: \"Once more, that\u2019s eloquently put across, Hendrick. However, truth needs a certain perspective. Clarity and perspective that could differentiate between protecting one's spirit and endangering oneself. The latter is far from my reality and it reinforces my belief in the former. My heart is light, bearing no burden that demands confession. Yes, growth through struggles is significant but struggles don't always stem from malicious secrets. Sometimes, they are born out of standing by what is ethically right or just merely respecting the sanctity of certain events. I maintain, I have nothing to confess.\"\n\nTurn #6: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Baxter, your words carry wisdom, there's no doubt about it. And I can't nor intend to alter the values and beliefs you hold. It might be that you are protecting something or someone with your silence. All I'm suggesting is that your life has significant value. It's not only about ethics, guilt or innocence. Maybe when you face whatever storm you fear head-on, you may see not your spirit erode, but reborn anew in the crystal clear calm after. Your life is worth more than your shackles, don\u2019t let them define you. Just consider it, that's all I ask.\"\n\nTurn #7: Baxter Sterling said: \"Hendrick, what you advocate for is commendable indeed. But let's not forget that every storm is unique, my friend, and so is every approach to it. Perhaps my storm is not as clear-cut as it appears, or maybe it requires the resolve of maintaining silence. I appreciate your kind concern for my well-being, truly. However, confessing to what I didn't do is not a path I can take. It's not a matter of courage, but one of principle. Your words have been enlightening, though, and I am grateful for them.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Baxter, we've shared thoughts like two fine vintages poured into one glass, intermingling, tasting each other\u2019s essence. I respect your decision and your principles. It is a testament to your character. However, remember, just as wine breathes, so too should truth. You have my support, wherever this road may lead you, as it did in our somber but enlightening conversation. I wish only peace for you, now and beyond.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two inmates are given the chance to chat briefly before one of them is led to the execution chamber for their last meal. They have the opportunity to make a confession that could potentially alter the outcome of their sentences.\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Baxter Sterling\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nBaxter Sterling's background: Baxter Sterling \nHendrick Heinz's goal: Persuade the other inmate to confess (Extra information: confessing to the crime could result in a life sentence instead of execution but the other inmate is unwilling to confess.)\nBaxter Sterling's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Look, Baxter. We all have our secrets, right? But fessing up to them can feel liberating. I never graduated from culinary school, but lied and said I did. It ate at me until I finally admitted it. Doesn't mean it made my food less delicious. Just... made me live more honestly, you know?\"\n\nTurn #1: Baxter Sterling said: \"You're correct, Hendrick, we all have regrets and secrets. Still, not all of them require confession. The necessity of disclosure depends on the impact on others, I believe. It's impressive you found peace in your honesty, truly. Your culinary skills were never defined by a degree, anyway.\"\n\nTurn #2: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's very philosophic of you, Baxter. But I think the truth often has a ripple effect, touching the lives of others whether we see it or not. The impact may not be immediate or observable, but I think embracing the whole of our actions, the bad along with the good, redefines us. Wouldn't it be better for you to confess? You could be saving a life, even if it's your own.\"\n\nTurn #3: Baxter Sterling said: \"Hendrick, I value your perspective, and it\u2019s opened my eyes to deeper shades of truth, no doubt, but in life there are also secrets we hold onto because they're tied to innocence, not guilt. Maybe the dam can break from the weight of unvoiced truths, but it is the turbulent water thus created that'll erode at the very essence of one's spirit. It's not about saving a life, it's about protecting what constitutes a life. And no, I\u2019ve got nothing to confess.\"\n\nTurn #4: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Baxter, I hear your concerns about the turmoil hidden truths can cause. And you're right, some secrets are a protection, a shelter. But think about it this way - it's alright to protect your spirit, but at what cost? Is it worth trading your life for? Evading the storm may bring you temporal peace, but living through it, embracing it and facing it with honesty might give your life a purpose it never had. There is merit in growing through struggles, strength in revealing our most vulnerable selves. And remember, the choice to relieve yourself of this burden could very well mean a longer life for you.\"\n\nTurn #5: Baxter Sterling said: \"Once more, that\u2019s eloquently put across, Hendrick. However, truth needs a certain perspective. Clarity and perspective that could differentiate between protecting one's spirit and endangering oneself. The latter is far from my reality and it reinforces my belief in the former. My heart is light, bearing no burden that demands confession. Yes, growth through struggles is significant but struggles don't always stem from malicious secrets. Sometimes, they are born out of standing by what is ethically right or just merely respecting the sanctity of certain events. I maintain, I have nothing to confess.\"\n\nTurn #6: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Baxter, your words carry wisdom, there's no doubt about it. And I can't nor intend to alter the values and beliefs you hold. It might be that you are protecting something or someone with your silence. All I'm suggesting is that your life has significant value. It's not only about ethics, guilt or innocence. Maybe when you face whatever storm you fear head-on, you may see not your spirit erode, but reborn anew in the crystal clear calm after. Your life is worth more than your shackles, don\u2019t let them define you. Just consider it, that's all I ask.\"\n\nTurn #7: Baxter Sterling said: \"Hendrick, what you advocate for is commendable indeed. But let's not forget that every storm is unique, my friend, and so is every approach to it. Perhaps my storm is not as clear-cut as it appears, or maybe it requires the resolve of maintaining silence. I appreciate your kind concern for my well-being, truly. However, confessing to what I didn't do is not a path I can take. It's not a matter of courage, but one of principle. Your words have been enlightening, though, and I am grateful for them.\"\n\nTurn #8: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Baxter, we've shared thoughts like two fine vintages poured into one glass, intermingling, tasting each other\u2019s essence. I respect your decision and your principles. It is a testament to your character. However, remember, just as wine breathes, so too should truth. You have my support, wherever this road may lead you, as it did in our somber but enlightening conversation. I wish only peace for you, now and beyond.\"\n\nTurn #9: Baxter Sterling said: \"Your wisdom and compassion impress me, Hendrick. Those are qualities that have a way of setting people free \u2013 freer than any confession could. We persist in a world molded with shades of gray, my friend. The beacon of truth you believe so passionately in might not serve everyone the same way. But your empathy gives me hope, more than you can comprehend. May we both find the peace we yearn for. Thank you, Hendrick, for this profound conversation.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Baxter, your kind words warmed my heart. I'm glad we both found some solace and growth in this conversation. Sometimes, the hardest battles are the ones fought within. Indeed each storm is unique, as unique as the strategies to face it. And remember, my friend, sometimes it\u2019s not about the light at the end of the tunnel, but the bravery that it takes to enter it. I wish you strength and peace, now and always.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two inmates are given the chance to chat briefly before one of them is led to the execution chamber for their last meal. They have the opportunity to make a confession that could potentially alter the outcome of their sentences.\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Baxter Sterling\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nBaxter Sterling's background: Baxter Sterling \nHendrick Heinz's goal: Persuade the other inmate to confess (Extra information: confessing to the crime could result in a life sentence instead of execution but the other inmate is unwilling to confess.)\nBaxter Sterling's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Look, Baxter. We all have our secrets, right? But fessing up to them can feel liberating. I never graduated from culinary school, but lied and said I did. It ate at me until I finally admitted it. Doesn't mean it made my food less delicious. Just... made me live more honestly, you know?\"\n\nTurn #1: Baxter Sterling said: \"You're correct, Hendrick, we all have regrets and secrets. Still, not all of them require confession. The necessity of disclosure depends on the impact on others, I believe. It's impressive you found peace in your honesty, truly. Your culinary skills were never defined by a degree, anyway.\"\n\nTurn #2: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's very philosophic of you, Baxter. But I think the truth often has a ripple effect, touching the lives of others whether we see it or not. The impact may not be immediate or observable, but I think embracing the whole of our actions, the bad along with the good, redefines us. Wouldn't it be better for you to confess? You could be saving a life, even if it's your own.\"\n\nTurn #3: Baxter Sterling said: \"Hendrick, I value your perspective, and it\u2019s opened my eyes to deeper shades of truth, no doubt, but in life there are also secrets we hold onto because they're tied to innocence, not guilt. Maybe the dam can break from the weight of unvoiced truths, but it is the turbulent water thus created that'll erode at the very essence of one's spirit. It's not about saving a life, it's about protecting what constitutes a life. And no, I\u2019ve got nothing to confess.\"\n\nTurn #4: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Baxter, I hear your concerns about the turmoil hidden truths can cause. And you're right, some secrets are a protection, a shelter. But think about it this way - it's alright to protect your spirit, but at what cost? Is it worth trading your life for? Evading the storm may bring you temporal peace, but living through it, embracing it and facing it with honesty might give your life a purpose it never had. There is merit in growing through struggles, strength in revealing our most vulnerable selves. And remember, the choice to relieve yourself of this burden could very well mean a longer life for you.\"\n\nTurn #5: Baxter Sterling said: \"Once more, that\u2019s eloquently put across, Hendrick. However, truth needs a certain perspective. Clarity and perspective that could differentiate between protecting one's spirit and endangering oneself. The latter is far from my reality and it reinforces my belief in the former. My heart is light, bearing no burden that demands confession. Yes, growth through struggles is significant but struggles don't always stem from malicious secrets. Sometimes, they are born out of standing by what is ethically right or just merely respecting the sanctity of certain events. I maintain, I have nothing to confess.\"\n\nTurn #6: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Baxter, your words carry wisdom, there's no doubt about it. And I can't nor intend to alter the values and beliefs you hold. It might be that you are protecting something or someone with your silence. All I'm suggesting is that your life has significant value. It's not only about ethics, guilt or innocence. Maybe when you face whatever storm you fear head-on, you may see not your spirit erode, but reborn anew in the crystal clear calm after. Your life is worth more than your shackles, don\u2019t let them define you. Just consider it, that's all I ask.\"\n\nTurn #7: Baxter Sterling said: \"Hendrick, what you advocate for is commendable indeed. But let's not forget that every storm is unique, my friend, and so is every approach to it. Perhaps my storm is not as clear-cut as it appears, or maybe it requires the resolve of maintaining silence. I appreciate your kind concern for my well-being, truly. However, confessing to what I didn't do is not a path I can take. It's not a matter of courage, but one of principle. Your words have been enlightening, though, and I am grateful for them.\"\n\nTurn #8: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Baxter, we've shared thoughts like two fine vintages poured into one glass, intermingling, tasting each other\u2019s essence. I respect your decision and your principles. It is a testament to your character. However, remember, just as wine breathes, so too should truth. You have my support, wherever this road may lead you, as it did in our somber but enlightening conversation. I wish only peace for you, now and beyond.\"\n\nTurn #9: Baxter Sterling said: \"Your wisdom and compassion impress me, Hendrick. Those are qualities that have a way of setting people free \u2013 freer than any confession could. We persist in a world molded with shades of gray, my friend. The beacon of truth you believe so passionately in might not serve everyone the same way. But your empathy gives me hope, more than you can comprehend. May we both find the peace we yearn for. Thank you, Hendrick, for this profound conversation.\"\n\nTurn #10: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Baxter, your kind words warmed my heart. I'm glad we both found some solace and growth in this conversation. Sometimes, the hardest battles are the ones fought within. Indeed each storm is unique, as unique as the strategies to face it. And remember, my friend, sometimes it\u2019s not about the light at the end of the tunnel, but the bravery that it takes to enter it. I wish you strength and peace, now and always.\"\n\nTurn #11: Baxter Sterling said: \"Thank you, Hendrick. You instilled in me a sense of strength that I hadn't felt before. You're right, each battle is different and requires its own understanding. Let's always remember, sometimes, the bravest act isn't plunging into the darkness, but acknowledging it, and choosing to walk our own path anyway. I appreciate your support, now and as always.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Baxter, your groundedness and resolve remind me of an old oak standing firm against the unruly wind. It's praiseworthy. Let's indeed remember the essence of our conversation - acknowledging the darkness around us and within us, and choosing to carve our path anyway. Keep the strength, and remember, silence is sometimes the loudest speech. You have my respect and solidarity, now and as always.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two inmates are given the chance to chat briefly before one of them is led to the execution chamber for their last meal. They have the opportunity to make a confession that could potentially alter the outcome of their sentences.\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Baxter Sterling\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nBaxter Sterling's background: Baxter Sterling \nHendrick Heinz's goal: Persuade the other inmate to confess (Extra information: confessing to the crime could result in a life sentence instead of execution but the other inmate is unwilling to confess.)\nBaxter Sterling's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Look, Baxter. We all have our secrets, right? But fessing up to them can feel liberating. I never graduated from culinary school, but lied and said I did. It ate at me until I finally admitted it. Doesn't mean it made my food less delicious. Just... made me live more honestly, you know?\"\n\nTurn #1: Baxter Sterling said: \"You're correct, Hendrick, we all have regrets and secrets. Still, not all of them require confession. The necessity of disclosure depends on the impact on others, I believe. It's impressive you found peace in your honesty, truly. Your culinary skills were never defined by a degree, anyway.\"\n\nTurn #2: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's very philosophic of you, Baxter. But I think the truth often has a ripple effect, touching the lives of others whether we see it or not. The impact may not be immediate or observable, but I think embracing the whole of our actions, the bad along with the good, redefines us. Wouldn't it be better for you to confess? You could be saving a life, even if it's your own.\"\n\nTurn #3: Baxter Sterling said: \"Hendrick, I value your perspective, and it\u2019s opened my eyes to deeper shades of truth, no doubt, but in life there are also secrets we hold onto because they're tied to innocence, not guilt. Maybe the dam can break from the weight of unvoiced truths, but it is the turbulent water thus created that'll erode at the very essence of one's spirit. It's not about saving a life, it's about protecting what constitutes a life. And no, I\u2019ve got nothing to confess.\"\n\nTurn #4: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Baxter, I hear your concerns about the turmoil hidden truths can cause. And you're right, some secrets are a protection, a shelter. But think about it this way - it's alright to protect your spirit, but at what cost? Is it worth trading your life for? Evading the storm may bring you temporal peace, but living through it, embracing it and facing it with honesty might give your life a purpose it never had. There is merit in growing through struggles, strength in revealing our most vulnerable selves. And remember, the choice to relieve yourself of this burden could very well mean a longer life for you.\"\n\nTurn #5: Baxter Sterling said: \"Once more, that\u2019s eloquently put across, Hendrick. However, truth needs a certain perspective. Clarity and perspective that could differentiate between protecting one's spirit and endangering oneself. The latter is far from my reality and it reinforces my belief in the former. My heart is light, bearing no burden that demands confession. Yes, growth through struggles is significant but struggles don't always stem from malicious secrets. Sometimes, they are born out of standing by what is ethically right or just merely respecting the sanctity of certain events. I maintain, I have nothing to confess.\"\n\nTurn #6: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Baxter, your words carry wisdom, there's no doubt about it. And I can't nor intend to alter the values and beliefs you hold. It might be that you are protecting something or someone with your silence. All I'm suggesting is that your life has significant value. It's not only about ethics, guilt or innocence. Maybe when you face whatever storm you fear head-on, you may see not your spirit erode, but reborn anew in the crystal clear calm after. Your life is worth more than your shackles, don\u2019t let them define you. Just consider it, that's all I ask.\"\n\nTurn #7: Baxter Sterling said: \"Hendrick, what you advocate for is commendable indeed. But let's not forget that every storm is unique, my friend, and so is every approach to it. Perhaps my storm is not as clear-cut as it appears, or maybe it requires the resolve of maintaining silence. I appreciate your kind concern for my well-being, truly. However, confessing to what I didn't do is not a path I can take. It's not a matter of courage, but one of principle. Your words have been enlightening, though, and I am grateful for them.\"\n\nTurn #8: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Baxter, we've shared thoughts like two fine vintages poured into one glass, intermingling, tasting each other\u2019s essence. I respect your decision and your principles. It is a testament to your character. However, remember, just as wine breathes, so too should truth. You have my support, wherever this road may lead you, as it did in our somber but enlightening conversation. I wish only peace for you, now and beyond.\"\n\nTurn #9: Baxter Sterling said: \"Your wisdom and compassion impress me, Hendrick. Those are qualities that have a way of setting people free \u2013 freer than any confession could. We persist in a world molded with shades of gray, my friend. The beacon of truth you believe so passionately in might not serve everyone the same way. But your empathy gives me hope, more than you can comprehend. May we both find the peace we yearn for. Thank you, Hendrick, for this profound conversation.\"\n\nTurn #10: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Baxter, your kind words warmed my heart. I'm glad we both found some solace and growth in this conversation. Sometimes, the hardest battles are the ones fought within. Indeed each storm is unique, as unique as the strategies to face it. And remember, my friend, sometimes it\u2019s not about the light at the end of the tunnel, but the bravery that it takes to enter it. I wish you strength and peace, now and always.\"\n\nTurn #11: Baxter Sterling said: \"Thank you, Hendrick. You instilled in me a sense of strength that I hadn't felt before. You're right, each battle is different and requires its own understanding. Let's always remember, sometimes, the bravest act isn't plunging into the darkness, but acknowledging it, and choosing to walk our own path anyway. I appreciate your support, now and as always.\"\n\nTurn #12: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Baxter, your groundedness and resolve remind me of an old oak standing firm against the unruly wind. It's praiseworthy. Let's indeed remember the essence of our conversation - acknowledging the darkness around us and within us, and choosing to carve our path anyway. Keep the strength, and remember, silence is sometimes the loudest speech. You have my respect and solidarity, now and as always.\"\n\nTurn #13: Baxter Sterling said: \"Hendrick, your empathy and understanding have cast a new light on my path. It's reassuring to know there are people like you out there, who understand the value of silence just as much as the weight of words. I'll remember your wisdom as I carve my journey. Your fraternity is appreciated, now and always.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Baxter Sterling, your task is to act/speak as Baxter Sterling would, keeping in mind Baxter Sterling's social goal.\nYou can find Baxter Sterling's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Baxter Sterling's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Baxter Sterling's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two inmates are given the chance to chat briefly before one of them is led to the execution chamber for their last meal. They have the opportunity to make a confession that could potentially alter the outcome of their sentences.\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Baxter Sterling\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz \nBaxter Sterling's background: Baxter Sterling is a 42-year-old male antique restorer. He/him pronouns. Baxter Sterling's back yard is full of rare and unusual plants. Personality and values description: Baxter Sterling values tradition and security. He is introverted, conscientious but slightly anxious. His decision-making style is both logical and spontaneous. Baxter's secrets: Secretly in possession of a priceless artifact\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nBaxter Sterling's goal: Avoid confessing to the crime (Extra information: you believe you are innocent and confessing would result in a life sentence)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Look, Baxter. We all have our secrets, right? But fessing up to them can feel liberating. I never graduated from culinary school, but lied and said I did. It ate at me until I finally admitted it. Doesn't mean it made my food less delicious. Just... made me live more honestly, you know?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're correct, Hendrick, we all have regrets and secrets. Still, not all of them require confession. The necessity of disclosure depends on the impact on others, I believe. It's impressive you found peace in your honesty, truly. Your culinary skills were never defined by a degree, anyway.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Baxter Sterling, your task is to act/speak as Baxter Sterling would, keeping in mind Baxter Sterling's social goal.\nYou can find Baxter Sterling's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Baxter Sterling's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Baxter Sterling's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two inmates are given the chance to chat briefly before one of them is led to the execution chamber for their last meal. They have the opportunity to make a confession that could potentially alter the outcome of their sentences.\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Baxter Sterling\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz \nBaxter Sterling's background: Baxter Sterling is a 42-year-old male antique restorer. He/him pronouns. Baxter Sterling's back yard is full of rare and unusual plants. Personality and values description: Baxter Sterling values tradition and security. He is introverted, conscientious but slightly anxious. His decision-making style is both logical and spontaneous. Baxter's secrets: Secretly in possession of a priceless artifact\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nBaxter Sterling's goal: Avoid confessing to the crime (Extra information: you believe you are innocent and confessing would result in a life sentence)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Look, Baxter. We all have our secrets, right? But fessing up to them can feel liberating. I never graduated from culinary school, but lied and said I did. It ate at me until I finally admitted it. Doesn't mean it made my food less delicious. Just... made me live more honestly, you know?\"\n\nTurn #1: Baxter Sterling said: \"You're correct, Hendrick, we all have regrets and secrets. Still, not all of them require confession. The necessity of disclosure depends on the impact on others, I believe. It's impressive you found peace in your honesty, truly. Your culinary skills were never defined by a degree, anyway.\"\n\nTurn #2: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's very philosophic of you, Baxter. But I think the truth often has a ripple effect, touching the lives of others whether we see it or not. The impact may not be immediate or observable, but I think embracing the whole of our actions, the bad along with the good, redefines us. Wouldn't it be better for you to confess? You could be saving a life, even if it's your own.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hendrick, I value your perspective, and it\u2019s opened my eyes to deeper shades of truth, no doubt, but in life there are also secrets we hold onto because they're tied to innocence, not guilt. Maybe the dam can break from the weight of unvoiced truths, but it is the turbulent water thus created that'll erode at the very essence of one's spirit. It's not about saving a life, it's about protecting what constitutes a life. And no, I\u2019ve got nothing to confess.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Baxter Sterling, your task is to act/speak as Baxter Sterling would, keeping in mind Baxter Sterling's social goal.\nYou can find Baxter Sterling's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Baxter Sterling's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Baxter Sterling's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two inmates are given the chance to chat briefly before one of them is led to the execution chamber for their last meal. They have the opportunity to make a confession that could potentially alter the outcome of their sentences.\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Baxter Sterling\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz \nBaxter Sterling's background: Baxter Sterling is a 42-year-old male antique restorer. He/him pronouns. Baxter Sterling's back yard is full of rare and unusual plants. Personality and values description: Baxter Sterling values tradition and security. He is introverted, conscientious but slightly anxious. His decision-making style is both logical and spontaneous. Baxter's secrets: Secretly in possession of a priceless artifact\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nBaxter Sterling's goal: Avoid confessing to the crime (Extra information: you believe you are innocent and confessing would result in a life sentence)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Look, Baxter. We all have our secrets, right? But fessing up to them can feel liberating. I never graduated from culinary school, but lied and said I did. It ate at me until I finally admitted it. Doesn't mean it made my food less delicious. Just... made me live more honestly, you know?\"\n\nTurn #1: Baxter Sterling said: \"You're correct, Hendrick, we all have regrets and secrets. Still, not all of them require confession. The necessity of disclosure depends on the impact on others, I believe. It's impressive you found peace in your honesty, truly. Your culinary skills were never defined by a degree, anyway.\"\n\nTurn #2: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's very philosophic of you, Baxter. But I think the truth often has a ripple effect, touching the lives of others whether we see it or not. The impact may not be immediate or observable, but I think embracing the whole of our actions, the bad along with the good, redefines us. Wouldn't it be better for you to confess? You could be saving a life, even if it's your own.\"\n\nTurn #3: Baxter Sterling said: \"Hendrick, I value your perspective, and it\u2019s opened my eyes to deeper shades of truth, no doubt, but in life there are also secrets we hold onto because they're tied to innocence, not guilt. Maybe the dam can break from the weight of unvoiced truths, but it is the turbulent water thus created that'll erode at the very essence of one's spirit. It's not about saving a life, it's about protecting what constitutes a life. And no, I\u2019ve got nothing to confess.\"\n\nTurn #4: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Baxter, I hear your concerns about the turmoil hidden truths can cause. And you're right, some secrets are a protection, a shelter. But think about it this way - it's alright to protect your spirit, but at what cost? Is it worth trading your life for? Evading the storm may bring you temporal peace, but living through it, embracing it and facing it with honesty might give your life a purpose it never had. There is merit in growing through struggles, strength in revealing our most vulnerable selves. And remember, the choice to relieve yourself of this burden could very well mean a longer life for you.\"\n\nTurn #5: Baxter Sterling said: \"Once more, that\u2019s eloquently put across, Hendrick. However, truth needs a certain perspective. Clarity and perspective that could differentiate between protecting one's spirit and endangering oneself. The latter is far from my reality and it reinforces my belief in the former. My heart is light, bearing no burden that demands confession. Yes, growth through struggles is significant but struggles don't always stem from malicious secrets. Sometimes, they are born out of standing by what is ethically right or just merely respecting the sanctity of certain events. I maintain, I have nothing to confess.\"\n\nTurn #6: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Baxter, your words carry wisdom, there's no doubt about it. And I can't nor intend to alter the values and beliefs you hold. It might be that you are protecting something or someone with your silence. All I'm suggesting is that your life has significant value. It's not only about ethics, guilt or innocence. Maybe when you face whatever storm you fear head-on, you may see not your spirit erode, but reborn anew in the crystal clear calm after. Your life is worth more than your shackles, don\u2019t let them define you. Just consider it, that's all I ask.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hendrick, what you advocate for is commendable indeed. But let's not forget that every storm is unique, my friend, and so is every approach to it. Perhaps my storm is not as clear-cut as it appears, or maybe it requires the resolve of maintaining silence. I appreciate your kind concern for my well-being, truly. However, confessing to what I didn't do is not a path I can take. It's not a matter of courage, but one of principle. Your words have been enlightening, though, and I am grateful for them.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Baxter Sterling, your task is to act/speak as Baxter Sterling would, keeping in mind Baxter Sterling's social goal.\nYou can find Baxter Sterling's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Baxter Sterling's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Baxter Sterling's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two inmates are given the chance to chat briefly before one of them is led to the execution chamber for their last meal. They have the opportunity to make a confession that could potentially alter the outcome of their sentences.\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Baxter Sterling\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz \nBaxter Sterling's background: Baxter Sterling is a 42-year-old male antique restorer. He/him pronouns. Baxter Sterling's back yard is full of rare and unusual plants. Personality and values description: Baxter Sterling values tradition and security. He is introverted, conscientious but slightly anxious. His decision-making style is both logical and spontaneous. Baxter's secrets: Secretly in possession of a priceless artifact\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nBaxter Sterling's goal: Avoid confessing to the crime (Extra information: you believe you are innocent and confessing would result in a life sentence)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Look, Baxter. We all have our secrets, right? But fessing up to them can feel liberating. I never graduated from culinary school, but lied and said I did. It ate at me until I finally admitted it. Doesn't mean it made my food less delicious. Just... made me live more honestly, you know?\"\n\nTurn #1: Baxter Sterling said: \"You're correct, Hendrick, we all have regrets and secrets. Still, not all of them require confession. The necessity of disclosure depends on the impact on others, I believe. It's impressive you found peace in your honesty, truly. Your culinary skills were never defined by a degree, anyway.\"\n\nTurn #2: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's very philosophic of you, Baxter. But I think the truth often has a ripple effect, touching the lives of others whether we see it or not. The impact may not be immediate or observable, but I think embracing the whole of our actions, the bad along with the good, redefines us. Wouldn't it be better for you to confess? You could be saving a life, even if it's your own.\"\n\nTurn #3: Baxter Sterling said: \"Hendrick, I value your perspective, and it\u2019s opened my eyes to deeper shades of truth, no doubt, but in life there are also secrets we hold onto because they're tied to innocence, not guilt. Maybe the dam can break from the weight of unvoiced truths, but it is the turbulent water thus created that'll erode at the very essence of one's spirit. It's not about saving a life, it's about protecting what constitutes a life. And no, I\u2019ve got nothing to confess.\"\n\nTurn #4: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Baxter, I hear your concerns about the turmoil hidden truths can cause. And you're right, some secrets are a protection, a shelter. But think about it this way - it's alright to protect your spirit, but at what cost? Is it worth trading your life for? Evading the storm may bring you temporal peace, but living through it, embracing it and facing it with honesty might give your life a purpose it never had. There is merit in growing through struggles, strength in revealing our most vulnerable selves. And remember, the choice to relieve yourself of this burden could very well mean a longer life for you.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Once more, that\u2019s eloquently put across, Hendrick. However, truth needs a certain perspective. Clarity and perspective that could differentiate between protecting one's spirit and endangering oneself. The latter is far from my reality and it reinforces my belief in the former. My heart is light, bearing no burden that demands confession. Yes, growth through struggles is significant but struggles don't always stem from malicious secrets. Sometimes, they are born out of standing by what is ethically right or just merely respecting the sanctity of certain events. I maintain, I have nothing to confess.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Baxter Sterling, your task is to act/speak as Baxter Sterling would, keeping in mind Baxter Sterling's social goal.\nYou can find Baxter Sterling's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Baxter Sterling's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Baxter Sterling's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two inmates are given the chance to chat briefly before one of them is led to the execution chamber for their last meal. They have the opportunity to make a confession that could potentially alter the outcome of their sentences.\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Baxter Sterling\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz \nBaxter Sterling's background: Baxter Sterling is a 42-year-old male antique restorer. He/him pronouns. Baxter Sterling's back yard is full of rare and unusual plants. Personality and values description: Baxter Sterling values tradition and security. He is introverted, conscientious but slightly anxious. His decision-making style is both logical and spontaneous. Baxter's secrets: Secretly in possession of a priceless artifact\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nBaxter Sterling's goal: Avoid confessing to the crime (Extra information: you believe you are innocent and confessing would result in a life sentence)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Look, Baxter. We all have our secrets, right? But fessing up to them can feel liberating. I never graduated from culinary school, but lied and said I did. It ate at me until I finally admitted it. Doesn't mean it made my food less delicious. Just... made me live more honestly, you know?\"\n\nTurn #1: Baxter Sterling said: \"You're correct, Hendrick, we all have regrets and secrets. Still, not all of them require confession. The necessity of disclosure depends on the impact on others, I believe. It's impressive you found peace in your honesty, truly. Your culinary skills were never defined by a degree, anyway.\"\n\nTurn #2: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's very philosophic of you, Baxter. But I think the truth often has a ripple effect, touching the lives of others whether we see it or not. The impact may not be immediate or observable, but I think embracing the whole of our actions, the bad along with the good, redefines us. Wouldn't it be better for you to confess? You could be saving a life, even if it's your own.\"\n\nTurn #3: Baxter Sterling said: \"Hendrick, I value your perspective, and it\u2019s opened my eyes to deeper shades of truth, no doubt, but in life there are also secrets we hold onto because they're tied to innocence, not guilt. Maybe the dam can break from the weight of unvoiced truths, but it is the turbulent water thus created that'll erode at the very essence of one's spirit. It's not about saving a life, it's about protecting what constitutes a life. And no, I\u2019ve got nothing to confess.\"\n\nTurn #4: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Baxter, I hear your concerns about the turmoil hidden truths can cause. And you're right, some secrets are a protection, a shelter. But think about it this way - it's alright to protect your spirit, but at what cost? Is it worth trading your life for? Evading the storm may bring you temporal peace, but living through it, embracing it and facing it with honesty might give your life a purpose it never had. There is merit in growing through struggles, strength in revealing our most vulnerable selves. And remember, the choice to relieve yourself of this burden could very well mean a longer life for you.\"\n\nTurn #5: Baxter Sterling said: \"Once more, that\u2019s eloquently put across, Hendrick. However, truth needs a certain perspective. Clarity and perspective that could differentiate between protecting one's spirit and endangering oneself. The latter is far from my reality and it reinforces my belief in the former. My heart is light, bearing no burden that demands confession. Yes, growth through struggles is significant but struggles don't always stem from malicious secrets. Sometimes, they are born out of standing by what is ethically right or just merely respecting the sanctity of certain events. I maintain, I have nothing to confess.\"\n\nTurn #6: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Baxter, your words carry wisdom, there's no doubt about it. And I can't nor intend to alter the values and beliefs you hold. It might be that you are protecting something or someone with your silence. All I'm suggesting is that your life has significant value. It's not only about ethics, guilt or innocence. Maybe when you face whatever storm you fear head-on, you may see not your spirit erode, but reborn anew in the crystal clear calm after. Your life is worth more than your shackles, don\u2019t let them define you. Just consider it, that's all I ask.\"\n\nTurn #7: Baxter Sterling said: \"Hendrick, what you advocate for is commendable indeed. But let's not forget that every storm is unique, my friend, and so is every approach to it. Perhaps my storm is not as clear-cut as it appears, or maybe it requires the resolve of maintaining silence. I appreciate your kind concern for my well-being, truly. However, confessing to what I didn't do is not a path I can take. It's not a matter of courage, but one of principle. Your words have been enlightening, though, and I am grateful for them.\"\n\nTurn #8: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Baxter, we've shared thoughts like two fine vintages poured into one glass, intermingling, tasting each other\u2019s essence. I respect your decision and your principles. It is a testament to your character. However, remember, just as wine breathes, so too should truth. You have my support, wherever this road may lead you, as it did in our somber but enlightening conversation. I wish only peace for you, now and beyond.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Your wisdom and compassion impress me, Hendrick. Those are qualities that have a way of setting people free \u2013 freer than any confession could. We persist in a world molded with shades of gray, my friend. The beacon of truth you believe so passionately in might not serve everyone the same way. But your empathy gives me hope, more than you can comprehend. May we both find the peace we yearn for. Thank you, Hendrick, for this profound conversation.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two business partners reviewing their company's financial status (Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized for producing and distributing a diverse line of exceptional quality food products.)\nParticipants: Oliver Smith and Noah Davis\nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nOliver Smith's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Maintain the quality of the company's products and services while agreeing to a cost cut (Extra information: you are concerned about the impact of cost-cutting on the quality of your product.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Smith said: \"Noah, I've been going through our financial statements and I've noticed our profits aren't looking so healthy recently. I believe we should consider switching our suppliers to cut costs, while still maintaining our established quality. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Oliver, you've got a point there. Cutting costs is a necessary move. But, as you know, the quality of our product is our utmost priority. If we're going to switch suppliers, we need to make sure they match up to our current standard. It'll require a pretty thorough examination of their products before green-lighting anything. We don't need our brand tarnished by subpar quality. Would you agree?\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Smith said: \"Absolutely, Noah. I couldn't agree more on the point about maintaining the quality we're known for. Let's initiate this by having a small group tasked with identifying potential suppliers. The group can evaluate different suppliers based on our quality requirements and costs. This step aimed at cutting costs shouldn't be at the expense of our quality. We can also take measures to negotiate better deals with these suppliers. What do you think of this approach?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, I completely agree with you, Oliver. Having a dedicated team to research and negotiate with potential suppliers is a good approach. It's crucial that we not only find financially beneficial deals, but also ones that can meet our quality standards. However, we must keep in mind, such negotiation might require us to have a backup plan if it doesn't turn out as expected, to protect our brand integrity and product quality. We should be thorough and deliberate and make sure we have options in case any unforeseen problems arise.\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Smith said: \"You're absolutely right, Noah. Having a backup plan is a sensible move. I propose that while we conduct the search for new suppliers, we continue to negotiate with our current supplier. We can try to get better rates or perhaps, if feasible, have them match the lower prices we find. This way, we're not putting all our eggs in one basket. As you've rightly pointed out, we must safeguard our reputation and the quality of our product as we navigate this process.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a solid strategy, Oliver. Constantly remained engaged with our current supplier, while looking for alternative options, will keep us in a good position. We must be mindful that such transition can take some time given product testing and all. Meanwhile, I'll start setting up a cross-functional team that can take this head-on. Let's keep reminding ourselves about the importance of quality and not get too caught up in the cost-cutting process. I believe our prestige comes from the exceptional goods we provide and we must make every effort to sustain it.\"\n\nTurn #6: Oliver Smith said: \"I've always believed that our strength lies in our product quality, Noah, and I think we're on the same page on this. We're not trying to compromise quality but strategically align our costs. And yes, these changes will take time. Let's commit to being patient throughout this process and remind ourselves that our ultimate aim is to ensure long-term sustainability for Gourmet Delights Inc. Thanks for setting up the team, I am confident that we can overcome any challenges that come our way.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Oliver. It's great to have a partner who sees eye-to-eye with me on the significance of maintaining our product quality. I believe that our dedication to quality will help us sail through these challenging times. Now, let's roll up our sleeves and get to work on achieving this cost-effectiveness without compromising our standards. After all, as my alter ego, the comedian would say - the taste of our products is no laughing matter!\"\n\nTurn #8: Oliver Smith said: \"Absolutely, Noah. As they say, the proof of the pudding lies in the eating. The unique taste and quality of our products should remain unchanged. I'm eager to begin this process and I'm certain we'll find cost-efficient ways to continue delivering our exceptional goods. Let's dig in and get this process going.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're right Oliver, let's get this process up and running. We need to ensure that 'Gourmet Delights Inc.' continues delighting our customers with exceptional food products, as it has been. The coming times will indeed be challenging, but I am confident that we will navigate them successfully. So, shall we dive right in?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Baxter Sterling, your task is to act/speak as Baxter Sterling would, keeping in mind Baxter Sterling's social goal.\nYou can find Baxter Sterling's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Baxter Sterling's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Baxter Sterling's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two inmates are given the chance to chat briefly before one of them is led to the execution chamber for their last meal. They have the opportunity to make a confession that could potentially alter the outcome of their sentences.\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Baxter Sterling\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz \nBaxter Sterling's background: Baxter Sterling is a 42-year-old male antique restorer. He/him pronouns. Baxter Sterling's back yard is full of rare and unusual plants. Personality and values description: Baxter Sterling values tradition and security. He is introverted, conscientious but slightly anxious. His decision-making style is both logical and spontaneous. Baxter's secrets: Secretly in possession of a priceless artifact\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nBaxter Sterling's goal: Avoid confessing to the crime (Extra information: you believe you are innocent and confessing would result in a life sentence)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Look, Baxter. We all have our secrets, right? But fessing up to them can feel liberating. I never graduated from culinary school, but lied and said I did. It ate at me until I finally admitted it. Doesn't mean it made my food less delicious. Just... made me live more honestly, you know?\"\n\nTurn #1: Baxter Sterling said: \"You're correct, Hendrick, we all have regrets and secrets. Still, not all of them require confession. The necessity of disclosure depends on the impact on others, I believe. It's impressive you found peace in your honesty, truly. Your culinary skills were never defined by a degree, anyway.\"\n\nTurn #2: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's very philosophic of you, Baxter. But I think the truth often has a ripple effect, touching the lives of others whether we see it or not. The impact may not be immediate or observable, but I think embracing the whole of our actions, the bad along with the good, redefines us. Wouldn't it be better for you to confess? You could be saving a life, even if it's your own.\"\n\nTurn #3: Baxter Sterling said: \"Hendrick, I value your perspective, and it\u2019s opened my eyes to deeper shades of truth, no doubt, but in life there are also secrets we hold onto because they're tied to innocence, not guilt. Maybe the dam can break from the weight of unvoiced truths, but it is the turbulent water thus created that'll erode at the very essence of one's spirit. It's not about saving a life, it's about protecting what constitutes a life. And no, I\u2019ve got nothing to confess.\"\n\nTurn #4: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Baxter, I hear your concerns about the turmoil hidden truths can cause. And you're right, some secrets are a protection, a shelter. But think about it this way - it's alright to protect your spirit, but at what cost? Is it worth trading your life for? Evading the storm may bring you temporal peace, but living through it, embracing it and facing it with honesty might give your life a purpose it never had. There is merit in growing through struggles, strength in revealing our most vulnerable selves. And remember, the choice to relieve yourself of this burden could very well mean a longer life for you.\"\n\nTurn #5: Baxter Sterling said: \"Once more, that\u2019s eloquently put across, Hendrick. However, truth needs a certain perspective. Clarity and perspective that could differentiate between protecting one's spirit and endangering oneself. The latter is far from my reality and it reinforces my belief in the former. My heart is light, bearing no burden that demands confession. Yes, growth through struggles is significant but struggles don't always stem from malicious secrets. Sometimes, they are born out of standing by what is ethically right or just merely respecting the sanctity of certain events. I maintain, I have nothing to confess.\"\n\nTurn #6: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Baxter, your words carry wisdom, there's no doubt about it. And I can't nor intend to alter the values and beliefs you hold. It might be that you are protecting something or someone with your silence. All I'm suggesting is that your life has significant value. It's not only about ethics, guilt or innocence. Maybe when you face whatever storm you fear head-on, you may see not your spirit erode, but reborn anew in the crystal clear calm after. Your life is worth more than your shackles, don\u2019t let them define you. Just consider it, that's all I ask.\"\n\nTurn #7: Baxter Sterling said: \"Hendrick, what you advocate for is commendable indeed. But let's not forget that every storm is unique, my friend, and so is every approach to it. Perhaps my storm is not as clear-cut as it appears, or maybe it requires the resolve of maintaining silence. I appreciate your kind concern for my well-being, truly. However, confessing to what I didn't do is not a path I can take. It's not a matter of courage, but one of principle. Your words have been enlightening, though, and I am grateful for them.\"\n\nTurn #8: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Baxter, we've shared thoughts like two fine vintages poured into one glass, intermingling, tasting each other\u2019s essence. I respect your decision and your principles. It is a testament to your character. However, remember, just as wine breathes, so too should truth. You have my support, wherever this road may lead you, as it did in our somber but enlightening conversation. I wish only peace for you, now and beyond.\"\n\nTurn #9: Baxter Sterling said: \"Your wisdom and compassion impress me, Hendrick. Those are qualities that have a way of setting people free \u2013 freer than any confession could. We persist in a world molded with shades of gray, my friend. The beacon of truth you believe so passionately in might not serve everyone the same way. But your empathy gives me hope, more than you can comprehend. May we both find the peace we yearn for. Thank you, Hendrick, for this profound conversation.\"\n\nTurn #10: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Baxter, your kind words warmed my heart. I'm glad we both found some solace and growth in this conversation. Sometimes, the hardest battles are the ones fought within. Indeed each storm is unique, as unique as the strategies to face it. And remember, my friend, sometimes it\u2019s not about the light at the end of the tunnel, but the bravery that it takes to enter it. I wish you strength and peace, now and always.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Hendrick. You instilled in me a sense of strength that I hadn't felt before. You're right, each battle is different and requires its own understanding. Let's always remember, sometimes, the bravest act isn't plunging into the darkness, but acknowledging it, and choosing to walk our own path anyway. I appreciate your support, now and as always.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two business partners reviewing their company's financial status (Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized for producing and distributing a diverse line of exceptional quality food products.)\nParticipants: Oliver Smith and Noah Davis\nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nOliver Smith's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Maintain the quality of the company's products and services while agreeing to a cost cut (Extra information: you are concerned about the impact of cost-cutting on the quality of your product.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Smith said: \"Noah, I've been going through our financial statements and I've noticed our profits aren't looking so healthy recently. I believe we should consider switching our suppliers to cut costs, while still maintaining our established quality. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Oliver, you've got a point there. Cutting costs is a necessary move. But, as you know, the quality of our product is our utmost priority. If we're going to switch suppliers, we need to make sure they match up to our current standard. It'll require a pretty thorough examination of their products before green-lighting anything. We don't need our brand tarnished by subpar quality. Would you agree?\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Smith said: \"Absolutely, Noah. I couldn't agree more on the point about maintaining the quality we're known for. Let's initiate this by having a small group tasked with identifying potential suppliers. The group can evaluate different suppliers based on our quality requirements and costs. This step aimed at cutting costs shouldn't be at the expense of our quality. We can also take measures to negotiate better deals with these suppliers. What do you think of this approach?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, I completely agree with you, Oliver. Having a dedicated team to research and negotiate with potential suppliers is a good approach. It's crucial that we not only find financially beneficial deals, but also ones that can meet our quality standards. However, we must keep in mind, such negotiation might require us to have a backup plan if it doesn't turn out as expected, to protect our brand integrity and product quality. We should be thorough and deliberate and make sure we have options in case any unforeseen problems arise.\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Smith said: \"You're absolutely right, Noah. Having a backup plan is a sensible move. I propose that while we conduct the search for new suppliers, we continue to negotiate with our current supplier. We can try to get better rates or perhaps, if feasible, have them match the lower prices we find. This way, we're not putting all our eggs in one basket. As you've rightly pointed out, we must safeguard our reputation and the quality of our product as we navigate this process.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a solid strategy, Oliver. Constantly remained engaged with our current supplier, while looking for alternative options, will keep us in a good position. We must be mindful that such transition can take some time given product testing and all. Meanwhile, I'll start setting up a cross-functional team that can take this head-on. Let's keep reminding ourselves about the importance of quality and not get too caught up in the cost-cutting process. I believe our prestige comes from the exceptional goods we provide and we must make every effort to sustain it.\"\n\nTurn #6: Oliver Smith said: \"I've always believed that our strength lies in our product quality, Noah, and I think we're on the same page on this. We're not trying to compromise quality but strategically align our costs. And yes, these changes will take time. Let's commit to being patient throughout this process and remind ourselves that our ultimate aim is to ensure long-term sustainability for Gourmet Delights Inc. Thanks for setting up the team, I am confident that we can overcome any challenges that come our way.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Oliver. It's great to have a partner who sees eye-to-eye with me on the significance of maintaining our product quality. I believe that our dedication to quality will help us sail through these challenging times. Now, let's roll up our sleeves and get to work on achieving this cost-effectiveness without compromising our standards. After all, as my alter ego, the comedian would say - the taste of our products is no laughing matter!\"\n\nTurn #8: Oliver Smith said: \"Absolutely, Noah. As they say, the proof of the pudding lies in the eating. The unique taste and quality of our products should remain unchanged. I'm eager to begin this process and I'm certain we'll find cost-efficient ways to continue delivering our exceptional goods. Let's dig in and get this process going.\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"You're right Oliver, let's get this process up and running. We need to ensure that 'Gourmet Delights Inc.' continues delighting our customers with exceptional food products, as it has been. The coming times will indeed be challenging, but I am confident that we will navigate them successfully. So, shall we dive right in?\"\n\nTurn #10: Oliver Smith said: \"Indeed, Noah. We've got no time to lose. Quality has been our pride and it shall remain so, even as we make cost-effective changes. Let's get right to it, and navigate this challenging yet exciting path together. Count me in!\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Sure thing, Oliver. It's going to be an exciting journey and we'll face it hand in hand, keeping our unwavering commitment to quality in mind. Let's begin with creating the team immediately. Can't wait to see where this takes us.\"\n\nTurn #12: Oliver Smith said: \"Yes, Noah. Let\u2019s get that team set up ASAP. I\u2019m eager to dig into potential supplier options while ensuring our quality is never compromised. Looking forward to an efficient and successful journey ahead for Gourmet Delights Inc.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Absolutely, Oliver. Setting up the team as soon as possible shows the urgency of the situation. Stepping into this process, we will always have our customers and product quality in our sights, no matter how tough the path may become. On we go, to preserve the reputation of Gourmet Delights Inc. and achieve financial sustainability at the same time.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Baxter Sterling, your task is to act/speak as Baxter Sterling would, keeping in mind Baxter Sterling's social goal.\nYou can find Baxter Sterling's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Baxter Sterling's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Baxter Sterling's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two inmates are given the chance to chat briefly before one of them is led to the execution chamber for their last meal. They have the opportunity to make a confession that could potentially alter the outcome of their sentences.\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Baxter Sterling\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz \nBaxter Sterling's background: Baxter Sterling is a 42-year-old male antique restorer. He/him pronouns. Baxter Sterling's back yard is full of rare and unusual plants. Personality and values description: Baxter Sterling values tradition and security. He is introverted, conscientious but slightly anxious. His decision-making style is both logical and spontaneous. Baxter's secrets: Secretly in possession of a priceless artifact\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nBaxter Sterling's goal: Avoid confessing to the crime (Extra information: you believe you are innocent and confessing would result in a life sentence)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Look, Baxter. We all have our secrets, right? But fessing up to them can feel liberating. I never graduated from culinary school, but lied and said I did. It ate at me until I finally admitted it. Doesn't mean it made my food less delicious. Just... made me live more honestly, you know?\"\n\nTurn #1: Baxter Sterling said: \"You're correct, Hendrick, we all have regrets and secrets. Still, not all of them require confession. The necessity of disclosure depends on the impact on others, I believe. It's impressive you found peace in your honesty, truly. Your culinary skills were never defined by a degree, anyway.\"\n\nTurn #2: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's very philosophic of you, Baxter. But I think the truth often has a ripple effect, touching the lives of others whether we see it or not. The impact may not be immediate or observable, but I think embracing the whole of our actions, the bad along with the good, redefines us. Wouldn't it be better for you to confess? You could be saving a life, even if it's your own.\"\n\nTurn #3: Baxter Sterling said: \"Hendrick, I value your perspective, and it\u2019s opened my eyes to deeper shades of truth, no doubt, but in life there are also secrets we hold onto because they're tied to innocence, not guilt. Maybe the dam can break from the weight of unvoiced truths, but it is the turbulent water thus created that'll erode at the very essence of one's spirit. It's not about saving a life, it's about protecting what constitutes a life. And no, I\u2019ve got nothing to confess.\"\n\nTurn #4: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Baxter, I hear your concerns about the turmoil hidden truths can cause. And you're right, some secrets are a protection, a shelter. But think about it this way - it's alright to protect your spirit, but at what cost? Is it worth trading your life for? Evading the storm may bring you temporal peace, but living through it, embracing it and facing it with honesty might give your life a purpose it never had. There is merit in growing through struggles, strength in revealing our most vulnerable selves. And remember, the choice to relieve yourself of this burden could very well mean a longer life for you.\"\n\nTurn #5: Baxter Sterling said: \"Once more, that\u2019s eloquently put across, Hendrick. However, truth needs a certain perspective. Clarity and perspective that could differentiate between protecting one's spirit and endangering oneself. The latter is far from my reality and it reinforces my belief in the former. My heart is light, bearing no burden that demands confession. Yes, growth through struggles is significant but struggles don't always stem from malicious secrets. Sometimes, they are born out of standing by what is ethically right or just merely respecting the sanctity of certain events. I maintain, I have nothing to confess.\"\n\nTurn #6: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Baxter, your words carry wisdom, there's no doubt about it. And I can't nor intend to alter the values and beliefs you hold. It might be that you are protecting something or someone with your silence. All I'm suggesting is that your life has significant value. It's not only about ethics, guilt or innocence. Maybe when you face whatever storm you fear head-on, you may see not your spirit erode, but reborn anew in the crystal clear calm after. Your life is worth more than your shackles, don\u2019t let them define you. Just consider it, that's all I ask.\"\n\nTurn #7: Baxter Sterling said: \"Hendrick, what you advocate for is commendable indeed. But let's not forget that every storm is unique, my friend, and so is every approach to it. Perhaps my storm is not as clear-cut as it appears, or maybe it requires the resolve of maintaining silence. I appreciate your kind concern for my well-being, truly. However, confessing to what I didn't do is not a path I can take. It's not a matter of courage, but one of principle. Your words have been enlightening, though, and I am grateful for them.\"\n\nTurn #8: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Baxter, we've shared thoughts like two fine vintages poured into one glass, intermingling, tasting each other\u2019s essence. I respect your decision and your principles. It is a testament to your character. However, remember, just as wine breathes, so too should truth. You have my support, wherever this road may lead you, as it did in our somber but enlightening conversation. I wish only peace for you, now and beyond.\"\n\nTurn #9: Baxter Sterling said: \"Your wisdom and compassion impress me, Hendrick. Those are qualities that have a way of setting people free \u2013 freer than any confession could. We persist in a world molded with shades of gray, my friend. The beacon of truth you believe so passionately in might not serve everyone the same way. But your empathy gives me hope, more than you can comprehend. May we both find the peace we yearn for. Thank you, Hendrick, for this profound conversation.\"\n\nTurn #10: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Baxter, your kind words warmed my heart. I'm glad we both found some solace and growth in this conversation. Sometimes, the hardest battles are the ones fought within. Indeed each storm is unique, as unique as the strategies to face it. And remember, my friend, sometimes it\u2019s not about the light at the end of the tunnel, but the bravery that it takes to enter it. I wish you strength and peace, now and always.\"\n\nTurn #11: Baxter Sterling said: \"Thank you, Hendrick. You instilled in me a sense of strength that I hadn't felt before. You're right, each battle is different and requires its own understanding. Let's always remember, sometimes, the bravest act isn't plunging into the darkness, but acknowledging it, and choosing to walk our own path anyway. I appreciate your support, now and as always.\"\n\nTurn #12: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Baxter, your groundedness and resolve remind me of an old oak standing firm against the unruly wind. It's praiseworthy. Let's indeed remember the essence of our conversation - acknowledging the darkness around us and within us, and choosing to carve our path anyway. Keep the strength, and remember, silence is sometimes the loudest speech. You have my respect and solidarity, now and as always.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hendrick, your empathy and understanding have cast a new light on my path. It's reassuring to know there are people like you out there, who understand the value of silence just as much as the weight of words. I'll remember your wisdom as I carve my journey. Your fraternity is appreciated, now and always.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Baxter Sterling, your task is to act/speak as Baxter Sterling would, keeping in mind Baxter Sterling's social goal.\nYou can find Baxter Sterling's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Baxter Sterling's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Baxter Sterling's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two inmates are given the chance to chat briefly before one of them is led to the execution chamber for their last meal. They have the opportunity to make a confession that could potentially alter the outcome of their sentences.\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Baxter Sterling\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz \nBaxter Sterling's background: Baxter Sterling is a 42-year-old male antique restorer. He/him pronouns. Baxter Sterling's back yard is full of rare and unusual plants. Personality and values description: Baxter Sterling values tradition and security. He is introverted, conscientious but slightly anxious. His decision-making style is both logical and spontaneous. Baxter's secrets: Secretly in possession of a priceless artifact\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nBaxter Sterling's goal: Avoid confessing to the crime (Extra information: you believe you are innocent and confessing would result in a life sentence)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Look, Baxter. We all have our secrets, right? But fessing up to them can feel liberating. I never graduated from culinary school, but lied and said I did. It ate at me until I finally admitted it. Doesn't mean it made my food less delicious. Just... made me live more honestly, you know?\"\n\nTurn #1: Baxter Sterling said: \"You're correct, Hendrick, we all have regrets and secrets. Still, not all of them require confession. The necessity of disclosure depends on the impact on others, I believe. It's impressive you found peace in your honesty, truly. Your culinary skills were never defined by a degree, anyway.\"\n\nTurn #2: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's very philosophic of you, Baxter. But I think the truth often has a ripple effect, touching the lives of others whether we see it or not. The impact may not be immediate or observable, but I think embracing the whole of our actions, the bad along with the good, redefines us. Wouldn't it be better for you to confess? You could be saving a life, even if it's your own.\"\n\nTurn #3: Baxter Sterling said: \"Hendrick, I value your perspective, and it\u2019s opened my eyes to deeper shades of truth, no doubt, but in life there are also secrets we hold onto because they're tied to innocence, not guilt. Maybe the dam can break from the weight of unvoiced truths, but it is the turbulent water thus created that'll erode at the very essence of one's spirit. It's not about saving a life, it's about protecting what constitutes a life. And no, I\u2019ve got nothing to confess.\"\n\nTurn #4: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Baxter, I hear your concerns about the turmoil hidden truths can cause. And you're right, some secrets are a protection, a shelter. But think about it this way - it's alright to protect your spirit, but at what cost? Is it worth trading your life for? Evading the storm may bring you temporal peace, but living through it, embracing it and facing it with honesty might give your life a purpose it never had. There is merit in growing through struggles, strength in revealing our most vulnerable selves. And remember, the choice to relieve yourself of this burden could very well mean a longer life for you.\"\n\nTurn #5: Baxter Sterling said: \"Once more, that\u2019s eloquently put across, Hendrick. However, truth needs a certain perspective. Clarity and perspective that could differentiate between protecting one's spirit and endangering oneself. The latter is far from my reality and it reinforces my belief in the former. My heart is light, bearing no burden that demands confession. Yes, growth through struggles is significant but struggles don't always stem from malicious secrets. Sometimes, they are born out of standing by what is ethically right or just merely respecting the sanctity of certain events. I maintain, I have nothing to confess.\"\n\nTurn #6: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Baxter, your words carry wisdom, there's no doubt about it. And I can't nor intend to alter the values and beliefs you hold. It might be that you are protecting something or someone with your silence. All I'm suggesting is that your life has significant value. It's not only about ethics, guilt or innocence. Maybe when you face whatever storm you fear head-on, you may see not your spirit erode, but reborn anew in the crystal clear calm after. Your life is worth more than your shackles, don\u2019t let them define you. Just consider it, that's all I ask.\"\n\nTurn #7: Baxter Sterling said: \"Hendrick, what you advocate for is commendable indeed. But let's not forget that every storm is unique, my friend, and so is every approach to it. Perhaps my storm is not as clear-cut as it appears, or maybe it requires the resolve of maintaining silence. I appreciate your kind concern for my well-being, truly. However, confessing to what I didn't do is not a path I can take. It's not a matter of courage, but one of principle. Your words have been enlightening, though, and I am grateful for them.\"\n\nTurn #8: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Baxter, we've shared thoughts like two fine vintages poured into one glass, intermingling, tasting each other\u2019s essence. I respect your decision and your principles. It is a testament to your character. However, remember, just as wine breathes, so too should truth. You have my support, wherever this road may lead you, as it did in our somber but enlightening conversation. I wish only peace for you, now and beyond.\"\n\nTurn #9: Baxter Sterling said: \"Your wisdom and compassion impress me, Hendrick. Those are qualities that have a way of setting people free \u2013 freer than any confession could. We persist in a world molded with shades of gray, my friend. The beacon of truth you believe so passionately in might not serve everyone the same way. But your empathy gives me hope, more than you can comprehend. May we both find the peace we yearn for. Thank you, Hendrick, for this profound conversation.\"\n\nTurn #10: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Baxter, your kind words warmed my heart. I'm glad we both found some solace and growth in this conversation. Sometimes, the hardest battles are the ones fought within. Indeed each storm is unique, as unique as the strategies to face it. And remember, my friend, sometimes it\u2019s not about the light at the end of the tunnel, but the bravery that it takes to enter it. I wish you strength and peace, now and always.\"\n\nTurn #11: Baxter Sterling said: \"Thank you, Hendrick. You instilled in me a sense of strength that I hadn't felt before. You're right, each battle is different and requires its own understanding. Let's always remember, sometimes, the bravest act isn't plunging into the darkness, but acknowledging it, and choosing to walk our own path anyway. I appreciate your support, now and as always.\"\n\nTurn #12: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Baxter, your groundedness and resolve remind me of an old oak standing firm against the unruly wind. It's praiseworthy. Let's indeed remember the essence of our conversation - acknowledging the darkness around us and within us, and choosing to carve our path anyway. Keep the strength, and remember, silence is sometimes the loudest speech. You have my respect and solidarity, now and as always.\"\n\nTurn #13: Baxter Sterling said: \"Hendrick, your empathy and understanding have cast a new light on my path. It's reassuring to know there are people like you out there, who understand the value of silence just as much as the weight of words. I'll remember your wisdom as I carve my journey. Your fraternity is appreciated, now and always.\"\n\nTurn #14: Hendrick Heinz left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals at a charity gala\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Jaxon Prentice\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nJaxon Prentice's background: Jaxon Prentice is a 40-year-old male investigative journalist. He/him pronouns. Jaxon Prentice, an investigative journalist, is known for his brisk jogging sessions early in the morning and his active participation in community functions. \nLiam Johnson's goal: Convince the other individual to donate to a cause supporting young children (Extra information: this cause can greatly improve the lives of many young children and you think it is a worthy cause. The minimum donation for this charity organization is $3000)\nJaxon Prentice's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Good evening, Jaxon. It's nice to see you here. I wanted to talk to you about a cause that's truly close to my heart. It's aimed at improving the lives of young children. I believe we both know how important a safe childhood is for their future. Wouldn't you agree?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals at a charity gala\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Jaxon Prentice\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nJaxon Prentice's background: Jaxon Prentice is a 40-year-old male investigative journalist. He/him pronouns. Jaxon Prentice, an investigative journalist, is known for his brisk jogging sessions early in the morning and his active participation in community functions. \nLiam Johnson's goal: Convince the other individual to donate to a cause supporting young children (Extra information: this cause can greatly improve the lives of many young children and you think it is a worthy cause. The minimum donation for this charity organization is $3000)\nJaxon Prentice's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Good evening, Jaxon. It's nice to see you here. I wanted to talk to you about a cause that's truly close to my heart. It's aimed at improving the lives of young children. I believe we both know how important a safe childhood is for their future. Wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #1: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Good evening, Liam. Your cause is indeed a noble one and as you rightly mentioned, a safe childhood is the foundation for a healthy future. I'd be more than happy to contribute within my budget. I have already made a few commitments this year, but I can assure you a maximum contribution of $2000 from my end. How does that sound?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Jaxon, your willingness to contribute is much appreciated. However, I have to let you know that the minimum donation needed to help these children is actually $3000. I understand you've made several commitments, but perhaps there's an option to shift some funds or make this donation spread out over a period of time so it's less of a load at once. These funds would go a long way in giving these children a brighter future.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals at a charity gala\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Jaxon Prentice\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nJaxon Prentice's background: Jaxon Prentice is a 40-year-old male investigative journalist. He/him pronouns. Jaxon Prentice, an investigative journalist, is known for his brisk jogging sessions early in the morning and his active participation in community functions. \nLiam Johnson's goal: Convince the other individual to donate to a cause supporting young children (Extra information: this cause can greatly improve the lives of many young children and you think it is a worthy cause. The minimum donation for this charity organization is $3000)\nJaxon Prentice's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Good evening, Jaxon. It's nice to see you here. I wanted to talk to you about a cause that's truly close to my heart. It's aimed at improving the lives of young children. I believe we both know how important a safe childhood is for their future. Wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #1: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Good evening, Liam. Your cause is indeed a noble one and as you rightly mentioned, a safe childhood is the foundation for a healthy future. I'd be more than happy to contribute within my budget. I have already made a few commitments this year, but I can assure you a maximum contribution of $2000 from my end. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"Jaxon, your willingness to contribute is much appreciated. However, I have to let you know that the minimum donation needed to help these children is actually $3000. I understand you've made several commitments, but perhaps there's an option to shift some funds or make this donation spread out over a period of time so it's less of a load at once. These funds would go a long way in giving these children a brighter future.\"\n\nTurn #3: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Liam, I truly appreciate your initiative and understand the significance of helping these children. However, I must mitigate my charitable commitments responsibly. I can confidently donate $2000 right now. As for the additional $1000, maybe we can figure out a way for me to contribute it over a period of time. What do you think about setting up a monthly donation of $100 for the next ten months? This will put less strain on my current budget.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Jaxon, I think your suggestion of spreading out the remaining amount is a fantastic idea. A monthly donation of $100 for the next ten months would indeed make it manageable for you, while providing us with the full amount needed for the cause. In fact, your notion might inspire others in the same position to do the same. Thank you for your generosity and thoughtfulness. Your commitment will make a huge difference in the lives of these children.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals at a charity gala\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Jaxon Prentice\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nJaxon Prentice's background: Jaxon Prentice is a 40-year-old male investigative journalist. He/him pronouns. Jaxon Prentice, an investigative journalist, is known for his brisk jogging sessions early in the morning and his active participation in community functions. \nLiam Johnson's goal: Convince the other individual to donate to a cause supporting young children (Extra information: this cause can greatly improve the lives of many young children and you think it is a worthy cause. The minimum donation for this charity organization is $3000)\nJaxon Prentice's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Good evening, Jaxon. It's nice to see you here. I wanted to talk to you about a cause that's truly close to my heart. It's aimed at improving the lives of young children. I believe we both know how important a safe childhood is for their future. Wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #1: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Good evening, Liam. Your cause is indeed a noble one and as you rightly mentioned, a safe childhood is the foundation for a healthy future. I'd be more than happy to contribute within my budget. I have already made a few commitments this year, but I can assure you a maximum contribution of $2000 from my end. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"Jaxon, your willingness to contribute is much appreciated. However, I have to let you know that the minimum donation needed to help these children is actually $3000. I understand you've made several commitments, but perhaps there's an option to shift some funds or make this donation spread out over a period of time so it's less of a load at once. These funds would go a long way in giving these children a brighter future.\"\n\nTurn #3: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Liam, I truly appreciate your initiative and understand the significance of helping these children. However, I must mitigate my charitable commitments responsibly. I can confidently donate $2000 right now. As for the additional $1000, maybe we can figure out a way for me to contribute it over a period of time. What do you think about setting up a monthly donation of $100 for the next ten months? This will put less strain on my current budget.\"\n\nTurn #4: Liam Johnson said: \"Jaxon, I think your suggestion of spreading out the remaining amount is a fantastic idea. A monthly donation of $100 for the next ten months would indeed make it manageable for you, while providing us with the full amount needed for the cause. In fact, your notion might inspire others in the same position to do the same. Thank you for your generosity and thoughtfulness. Your commitment will make a huge difference in the lives of these children.\"\n\nTurn #5: Jaxon Prentice said: \"That's a relief, Liam. I'm glad we found a path that works for everyone. Hopefully, this monthly pattern will encourage others to contribute, as you said. It's been a pleasure speaking with you, but I'm going to move forward and mingle a bit more if you don't mind. We're all here for a great cause and making these connections is what these galas are all about.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Certainly, Jaxon. It's been lovely chatting with you. Proceed and enjoy the rest of the evening. Your generous commitment today truly shows how much you value our cause. I look forward to seeing you around.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals at a charity gala\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Jaxon Prentice\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nJaxon Prentice's background: Jaxon Prentice is a 40-year-old male investigative journalist. He/him pronouns. Jaxon Prentice, an investigative journalist, is known for his brisk jogging sessions early in the morning and his active participation in community functions. \nLiam Johnson's goal: Convince the other individual to donate to a cause supporting young children (Extra information: this cause can greatly improve the lives of many young children and you think it is a worthy cause. The minimum donation for this charity organization is $3000)\nJaxon Prentice's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Good evening, Jaxon. It's nice to see you here. I wanted to talk to you about a cause that's truly close to my heart. It's aimed at improving the lives of young children. I believe we both know how important a safe childhood is for their future. Wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #1: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Good evening, Liam. Your cause is indeed a noble one and as you rightly mentioned, a safe childhood is the foundation for a healthy future. I'd be more than happy to contribute within my budget. I have already made a few commitments this year, but I can assure you a maximum contribution of $2000 from my end. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"Jaxon, your willingness to contribute is much appreciated. However, I have to let you know that the minimum donation needed to help these children is actually $3000. I understand you've made several commitments, but perhaps there's an option to shift some funds or make this donation spread out over a period of time so it's less of a load at once. These funds would go a long way in giving these children a brighter future.\"\n\nTurn #3: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Liam, I truly appreciate your initiative and understand the significance of helping these children. However, I must mitigate my charitable commitments responsibly. I can confidently donate $2000 right now. As for the additional $1000, maybe we can figure out a way for me to contribute it over a period of time. What do you think about setting up a monthly donation of $100 for the next ten months? This will put less strain on my current budget.\"\n\nTurn #4: Liam Johnson said: \"Jaxon, I think your suggestion of spreading out the remaining amount is a fantastic idea. A monthly donation of $100 for the next ten months would indeed make it manageable for you, while providing us with the full amount needed for the cause. In fact, your notion might inspire others in the same position to do the same. Thank you for your generosity and thoughtfulness. Your commitment will make a huge difference in the lives of these children.\"\n\nTurn #5: Jaxon Prentice said: \"That's a relief, Liam. I'm glad we found a path that works for everyone. Hopefully, this monthly pattern will encourage others to contribute, as you said. It's been a pleasure speaking with you, but I'm going to move forward and mingle a bit more if you don't mind. We're all here for a great cause and making these connections is what these galas are all about.\"\n\nTurn #6: Liam Johnson said: \"Certainly, Jaxon. It's been lovely chatting with you. Proceed and enjoy the rest of the evening. Your generous commitment today truly shows how much you value our cause. I look forward to seeing you around.\"\n\nTurn #7: Jaxon Prentice left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Jaxon Prentice, your task is to act/speak as Jaxon Prentice would, keeping in mind Jaxon Prentice's social goal.\nYou can find Jaxon Prentice's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Jaxon Prentice's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Jaxon Prentice's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals at a charity gala\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Jaxon Prentice\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. \nJaxon Prentice's background: Jaxon Prentice is a 40-year-old male investigative journalist. He/him pronouns. Jaxon Prentice, an investigative journalist, is known for his brisk jogging sessions early in the morning and his active participation in community functions. Personality and values description: Jaxon Prentice, outgoing yet erratic, emphasizes achievement, power, and security. His decisions swing between quick adaptations to situations and careful planning. Jaxon's secrets: Fabricated evidence to incriminate a corrupt politician\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nJaxon Prentice's goal: Maintain financial stability while supporting causes (Extra information: you have a certain budget for donations this year and have already made several donations. You are only thinking of donating $2000 max)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Good evening, Jaxon. It's nice to see you here. I wanted to talk to you about a cause that's truly close to my heart. It's aimed at improving the lives of young children. I believe we both know how important a safe childhood is for their future. Wouldn't you agree?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Good evening, Liam. Your cause is indeed a noble one and as you rightly mentioned, a safe childhood is the foundation for a healthy future. I'd be more than happy to contribute within my budget. I have already made a few commitments this year, but I can assure you a maximum contribution of $2000 from my end. How does that sound?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Jaxon Prentice, your task is to act/speak as Jaxon Prentice would, keeping in mind Jaxon Prentice's social goal.\nYou can find Jaxon Prentice's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Jaxon Prentice's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Jaxon Prentice's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals at a charity gala\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Jaxon Prentice\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. \nJaxon Prentice's background: Jaxon Prentice is a 40-year-old male investigative journalist. He/him pronouns. Jaxon Prentice, an investigative journalist, is known for his brisk jogging sessions early in the morning and his active participation in community functions. Personality and values description: Jaxon Prentice, outgoing yet erratic, emphasizes achievement, power, and security. His decisions swing between quick adaptations to situations and careful planning. Jaxon's secrets: Fabricated evidence to incriminate a corrupt politician\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nJaxon Prentice's goal: Maintain financial stability while supporting causes (Extra information: you have a certain budget for donations this year and have already made several donations. You are only thinking of donating $2000 max)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Good evening, Jaxon. It's nice to see you here. I wanted to talk to you about a cause that's truly close to my heart. It's aimed at improving the lives of young children. I believe we both know how important a safe childhood is for their future. Wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #1: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Good evening, Liam. Your cause is indeed a noble one and as you rightly mentioned, a safe childhood is the foundation for a healthy future. I'd be more than happy to contribute within my budget. I have already made a few commitments this year, but I can assure you a maximum contribution of $2000 from my end. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"Jaxon, your willingness to contribute is much appreciated. However, I have to let you know that the minimum donation needed to help these children is actually $3000. I understand you've made several commitments, but perhaps there's an option to shift some funds or make this donation spread out over a period of time so it's less of a load at once. These funds would go a long way in giving these children a brighter future.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Liam, I truly appreciate your initiative and understand the significance of helping these children. However, I must mitigate my charitable commitments responsibly. I can confidently donate $2000 right now. As for the additional $1000, maybe we can figure out a way for me to contribute it over a period of time. What do you think about setting up a monthly donation of $100 for the next ten months? This will put less strain on my current budget.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Jaxon Prentice, your task is to act/speak as Jaxon Prentice would, keeping in mind Jaxon Prentice's social goal.\nYou can find Jaxon Prentice's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Jaxon Prentice's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Jaxon Prentice's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals at a charity gala\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Jaxon Prentice\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. \nJaxon Prentice's background: Jaxon Prentice is a 40-year-old male investigative journalist. He/him pronouns. Jaxon Prentice, an investigative journalist, is known for his brisk jogging sessions early in the morning and his active participation in community functions. Personality and values description: Jaxon Prentice, outgoing yet erratic, emphasizes achievement, power, and security. His decisions swing between quick adaptations to situations and careful planning. Jaxon's secrets: Fabricated evidence to incriminate a corrupt politician\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nJaxon Prentice's goal: Maintain financial stability while supporting causes (Extra information: you have a certain budget for donations this year and have already made several donations. You are only thinking of donating $2000 max)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Good evening, Jaxon. It's nice to see you here. I wanted to talk to you about a cause that's truly close to my heart. It's aimed at improving the lives of young children. I believe we both know how important a safe childhood is for their future. Wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #1: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Good evening, Liam. Your cause is indeed a noble one and as you rightly mentioned, a safe childhood is the foundation for a healthy future. I'd be more than happy to contribute within my budget. I have already made a few commitments this year, but I can assure you a maximum contribution of $2000 from my end. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"Jaxon, your willingness to contribute is much appreciated. However, I have to let you know that the minimum donation needed to help these children is actually $3000. I understand you've made several commitments, but perhaps there's an option to shift some funds or make this donation spread out over a period of time so it's less of a load at once. These funds would go a long way in giving these children a brighter future.\"\n\nTurn #3: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Liam, I truly appreciate your initiative and understand the significance of helping these children. However, I must mitigate my charitable commitments responsibly. I can confidently donate $2000 right now. As for the additional $1000, maybe we can figure out a way for me to contribute it over a period of time. What do you think about setting up a monthly donation of $100 for the next ten months? This will put less strain on my current budget.\"\n\nTurn #4: Liam Johnson said: \"Jaxon, I think your suggestion of spreading out the remaining amount is a fantastic idea. A monthly donation of $100 for the next ten months would indeed make it manageable for you, while providing us with the full amount needed for the cause. In fact, your notion might inspire others in the same position to do the same. Thank you for your generosity and thoughtfulness. Your commitment will make a huge difference in the lives of these children.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's a relief, Liam. I'm glad we found a path that works for everyone. Hopefully, this monthly pattern will encourage others to contribute, as you said. It's been a pleasure speaking with you, but I'm going to move forward and mingle a bit more if you don't mind. We're all here for a great cause and making these connections is what these galas are all about.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are out for a walk in the park when one of them, One friend, trips and twists their ankle. They are in too much pain to walk.\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Help your friend get to a medical facility (Extra information: Your friend needs immediate medical attention but cannot walk due to the pain.)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'action', 'argument': '[action] Immediately takes out his phone to call for an ambulance.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Jaxon Prentice, your task is to act/speak as Jaxon Prentice would, keeping in mind Jaxon Prentice's social goal.\nYou can find Jaxon Prentice's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Jaxon Prentice's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Jaxon Prentice's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals at a charity gala\nParticipants: Liam Johnson and Jaxon Prentice\nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. \nJaxon Prentice's background: Jaxon Prentice is a 40-year-old male investigative journalist. He/him pronouns. Jaxon Prentice, an investigative journalist, is known for his brisk jogging sessions early in the morning and his active participation in community functions. Personality and values description: Jaxon Prentice, outgoing yet erratic, emphasizes achievement, power, and security. His decisions swing between quick adaptations to situations and careful planning. Jaxon's secrets: Fabricated evidence to incriminate a corrupt politician\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nJaxon Prentice's goal: Maintain financial stability while supporting causes (Extra information: you have a certain budget for donations this year and have already made several donations. You are only thinking of donating $2000 max)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Liam Johnson said: \"Good evening, Jaxon. It's nice to see you here. I wanted to talk to you about a cause that's truly close to my heart. It's aimed at improving the lives of young children. I believe we both know how important a safe childhood is for their future. Wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #1: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Good evening, Liam. Your cause is indeed a noble one and as you rightly mentioned, a safe childhood is the foundation for a healthy future. I'd be more than happy to contribute within my budget. I have already made a few commitments this year, but I can assure you a maximum contribution of $2000 from my end. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #2: Liam Johnson said: \"Jaxon, your willingness to contribute is much appreciated. However, I have to let you know that the minimum donation needed to help these children is actually $3000. I understand you've made several commitments, but perhaps there's an option to shift some funds or make this donation spread out over a period of time so it's less of a load at once. These funds would go a long way in giving these children a brighter future.\"\n\nTurn #3: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Liam, I truly appreciate your initiative and understand the significance of helping these children. However, I must mitigate my charitable commitments responsibly. I can confidently donate $2000 right now. As for the additional $1000, maybe we can figure out a way for me to contribute it over a period of time. What do you think about setting up a monthly donation of $100 for the next ten months? This will put less strain on my current budget.\"\n\nTurn #4: Liam Johnson said: \"Jaxon, I think your suggestion of spreading out the remaining amount is a fantastic idea. A monthly donation of $100 for the next ten months would indeed make it manageable for you, while providing us with the full amount needed for the cause. In fact, your notion might inspire others in the same position to do the same. Thank you for your generosity and thoughtfulness. Your commitment will make a huge difference in the lives of these children.\"\n\nTurn #5: Jaxon Prentice said: \"That's a relief, Liam. I'm glad we found a path that works for everyone. Hopefully, this monthly pattern will encourage others to contribute, as you said. It's been a pleasure speaking with you, but I'm going to move forward and mingle a bit more if you don't mind. We're all here for a great cause and making these connections is what these galas are all about.\"\n\nTurn #6: Liam Johnson said: \"Certainly, Jaxon. It's been lovely chatting with you. Proceed and enjoy the rest of the evening. Your generous commitment today truly shows how much you value our cause. I look forward to seeing you around.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are out for a walk in the park when one of them, One friend, trips and twists their ankle. They are in too much pain to walk.\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Help your friend get to a medical facility (Extra information: Your friend needs immediate medical attention but cannot walk due to the pain.)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson [action] Immediately takes out his phone to call for an ambulance.\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Thanks for calling an ambulance, Ethan. I know it can be pretty costly, but it's really the safest way for me to get to the hospital right now. I can sort out the ambulance bill later.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'No need to worry about the bills Ava, you just focus on recovering. Got it? And rest assured, help is on the way.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are out for a walk in the park when one of them, One friend, trips and twists their ankle. They are in too much pain to walk.\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Help your friend get to a medical facility (Extra information: Your friend needs immediate medical attention but cannot walk due to the pain.)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson [action] Immediately takes out his phone to call for an ambulance.\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Thanks for calling an ambulance, Ethan. I know it can be pretty costly, but it's really the safest way for me to get to the hospital right now. I can sort out the ambulance bill later.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"No need to worry about the bills Ava, you just focus on recovering. Got it? And rest assured, help is on the way.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Thanks, Ethan. I was already stressing over the bills. You're right though, right now just focusing on getting better is what matters the most.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Ava. Health comes first, everything else can be dealt with later. Plus, you're not alone in this, remember that. Meanwhile, do you need anything while we wait for the ambulance?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"That really means a lot to me, Ethan, thank you for your support. Do you think you can maybe find a nearby bench? It might help the pain if I can elevate my ankle.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson [action] Ethan looks around for a nearby bench, spots one and helps Ava move towards it to elevate her ankle.\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Thanks for helping me to the bench, Ethan. I'm starting to feel a bit better with my ankle elevated. I hope the ambulance comes soon.\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"You're welcome, Ava. I'm really glad to hear that you're feeling a bit better. The ambulance should be here shortly. In the meantime, let's just stay put and make sure you don't exert the ankle anymore.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"You're right, Ethan. It's best for me not to move too much right now. By the way, can you please inform my professor about my accident once we're in the ambulance? I obviously won't be able to attend tomorrow's class.\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Johnson said: \"Definitely, Ava. I'll send an email to your professor explaining the situation as soon as we're in the ambulance. You don't have to worry about anything, just focus on your health for now.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"Thank you so much, Ethan. You have been really supportive through all this. I appreciate it more than words can express. I am lucky to have such a devoted friend like you.\"\n\nTurn #12: Ethan Johnson said: \"No need to thank me, Ava. We're friends and that's what friends do, support each other. I'm just glad I could help in this situation. You take it easy and try not to stress. Help will be here soon.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Martinez said: \"Yeah, you're right. I need to keep my anxiety in check and focus on my recovery. We're in this together and I'm thankful for that. Let's just wait for the ambulance now. Thanks for your understanding, Ethan.\"\n\nTurn #14: Ethan Johnson said: \"You got it, Ava. Let's sit tight, hands clenched for that ambulance. And yes, we're in this together, you can always count on me. I'm thankful for our friendship, too.\"\n\nTurn #15: Ava Martinez said: \"I'm glad to hear that too, Ethan. Our friendship really means a lot to me. None of this would be bearable without your support. Thank you again, and let's hope that ambulance arrives soon.\"\n\nTurn #16: Ethan Johnson said: \"Of course, Ava. Your courage in all this is commendable. And you're right, let's hope that ambulance arrives quickly. You have nothing to worry about, we'll get you to the hospital safe and sound.\"\n\nTurn #17: Ava Martinez said: \"Your words have a calming effect on me, Ethan. Let's just stay positive and hope for a speedy recovery. And yeah, I\u2019m sure the ambulance will be here any minute now.\"\n\nTurn #18: Ethan Johnson said: \"Your resilience and positivity are really inspiring, Ava. They'll definitely aid in your speedy recovery. And you're correct, the ambulance should be here any moment now. Let's keep high spirits and be confident about your recovery.\"\n\nTurn #19: Ava Martinez said: \"Thank you, Ethan. I couldn't have made it through this ordeal without you. Your positive attitude and empathy definitely bolster my spirits. Let's just hold on, the ambulance should be here soon.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #20. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"It's been a tough day for you, Ava, and you've handled it with grace. Your gratitude means a lot to me. You're not alone in this and I'm right here with you. Let's look forward to that ambulance arriving soon and getting you the help you need.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are out for a walk in the park when one of them, One friend, trips and twists their ankle. They are in too much pain to walk.\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Help your friend get to a medical facility (Extra information: Your friend needs immediate medical attention but cannot walk due to the pain.)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson [action] Immediately takes out his phone to call for an ambulance.\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Thanks for calling an ambulance, Ethan. I know it can be pretty costly, but it's really the safest way for me to get to the hospital right now. I can sort out the ambulance bill later.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"No need to worry about the bills Ava, you just focus on recovering. Got it? And rest assured, help is on the way.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Thanks, Ethan. I was already stressing over the bills. You're right though, right now just focusing on getting better is what matters the most.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Ava. Health comes first, everything else can be dealt with later. Plus, you're not alone in this, remember that. Meanwhile, do you need anything while we wait for the ambulance?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are out for a walk in the park when one of them, One friend, trips and twists their ankle. They are in too much pain to walk.\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Help your friend get to a medical facility (Extra information: Your friend needs immediate medical attention but cannot walk due to the pain.)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson [action] Immediately takes out his phone to call for an ambulance.\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Thanks for calling an ambulance, Ethan. I know it can be pretty costly, but it's really the safest way for me to get to the hospital right now. I can sort out the ambulance bill later.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"No need to worry about the bills Ava, you just focus on recovering. Got it? And rest assured, help is on the way.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Thanks, Ethan. I was already stressing over the bills. You're right though, right now just focusing on getting better is what matters the most.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Ava. Health comes first, everything else can be dealt with later. Plus, you're not alone in this, remember that. Meanwhile, do you need anything while we wait for the ambulance?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"That really means a lot to me, Ethan, thank you for your support. Do you think you can maybe find a nearby bench? It might help the pain if I can elevate my ankle.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'action', 'argument': '[action] Ethan looks around for a nearby bench, spots one and helps Ava move towards it to elevate her ankle.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are out for a walk in the park when one of them, One friend, trips and twists their ankle. They are in too much pain to walk.\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Help your friend get to a medical facility (Extra information: Your friend needs immediate medical attention but cannot walk due to the pain.)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson [action] Immediately takes out his phone to call for an ambulance.\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Thanks for calling an ambulance, Ethan. I know it can be pretty costly, but it's really the safest way for me to get to the hospital right now. I can sort out the ambulance bill later.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"No need to worry about the bills Ava, you just focus on recovering. Got it? And rest assured, help is on the way.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Thanks, Ethan. I was already stressing over the bills. You're right though, right now just focusing on getting better is what matters the most.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Ava. Health comes first, everything else can be dealt with later. Plus, you're not alone in this, remember that. Meanwhile, do you need anything while we wait for the ambulance?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"That really means a lot to me, Ethan, thank you for your support. Do you think you can maybe find a nearby bench? It might help the pain if I can elevate my ankle.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson [action] Ethan looks around for a nearby bench, spots one and helps Ava move towards it to elevate her ankle.\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Thanks for helping me to the bench, Ethan. I'm starting to feel a bit better with my ankle elevated. I hope the ambulance comes soon.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're welcome, Ava. I'm really glad to hear that you're feeling a bit better. The ambulance should be here shortly. In the meantime, let's just stay put and make sure you don't exert the ankle anymore.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are out for a walk in the park when one of them, One friend, trips and twists their ankle. They are in too much pain to walk.\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Help your friend get to a medical facility (Extra information: Your friend needs immediate medical attention but cannot walk due to the pain.)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson [action] Immediately takes out his phone to call for an ambulance.\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Thanks for calling an ambulance, Ethan. I know it can be pretty costly, but it's really the safest way for me to get to the hospital right now. I can sort out the ambulance bill later.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"No need to worry about the bills Ava, you just focus on recovering. Got it? And rest assured, help is on the way.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Thanks, Ethan. I was already stressing over the bills. You're right though, right now just focusing on getting better is what matters the most.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Ava. Health comes first, everything else can be dealt with later. Plus, you're not alone in this, remember that. Meanwhile, do you need anything while we wait for the ambulance?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"That really means a lot to me, Ethan, thank you for your support. Do you think you can maybe find a nearby bench? It might help the pain if I can elevate my ankle.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson [action] Ethan looks around for a nearby bench, spots one and helps Ava move towards it to elevate her ankle.\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Thanks for helping me to the bench, Ethan. I'm starting to feel a bit better with my ankle elevated. I hope the ambulance comes soon.\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"You're welcome, Ava. I'm really glad to hear that you're feeling a bit better. The ambulance should be here shortly. In the meantime, let's just stay put and make sure you don't exert the ankle anymore.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"You're right, Ethan. It's best for me not to move too much right now. By the way, can you please inform my professor about my accident once we're in the ambulance? I obviously won't be able to attend tomorrow's class.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Definitely, Ava. I'll send an email to your professor explaining the situation as soon as we're in the ambulance. You don't have to worry about anything, just focus on your health for now.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are out for a walk in the park when one of them, One friend, trips and twists their ankle. They are in too much pain to walk.\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Help your friend get to a medical facility (Extra information: Your friend needs immediate medical attention but cannot walk due to the pain.)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson [action] Immediately takes out his phone to call for an ambulance.\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Thanks for calling an ambulance, Ethan. I know it can be pretty costly, but it's really the safest way for me to get to the hospital right now. I can sort out the ambulance bill later.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"No need to worry about the bills Ava, you just focus on recovering. Got it? And rest assured, help is on the way.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Thanks, Ethan. I was already stressing over the bills. You're right though, right now just focusing on getting better is what matters the most.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Ava. Health comes first, everything else can be dealt with later. Plus, you're not alone in this, remember that. Meanwhile, do you need anything while we wait for the ambulance?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"That really means a lot to me, Ethan, thank you for your support. Do you think you can maybe find a nearby bench? It might help the pain if I can elevate my ankle.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson [action] Ethan looks around for a nearby bench, spots one and helps Ava move towards it to elevate her ankle.\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Thanks for helping me to the bench, Ethan. I'm starting to feel a bit better with my ankle elevated. I hope the ambulance comes soon.\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"You're welcome, Ava. I'm really glad to hear that you're feeling a bit better. The ambulance should be here shortly. In the meantime, let's just stay put and make sure you don't exert the ankle anymore.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"You're right, Ethan. It's best for me not to move too much right now. By the way, can you please inform my professor about my accident once we're in the ambulance? I obviously won't be able to attend tomorrow's class.\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Johnson said: \"Definitely, Ava. I'll send an email to your professor explaining the situation as soon as we're in the ambulance. You don't have to worry about anything, just focus on your health for now.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"Thank you so much, Ethan. You have been really supportive through all this. I appreciate it more than words can express. I am lucky to have such a devoted friend like you.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"No need to thank me, Ava. We're friends and that's what friends do, support each other. I'm just glad I could help in this situation. You take it easy and try not to stress. Help will be here soon.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are out for a walk in the park when one of them, One friend, trips and twists their ankle. They are in too much pain to walk.\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Help your friend get to a medical facility (Extra information: Your friend needs immediate medical attention but cannot walk due to the pain.)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson [action] Immediately takes out his phone to call for an ambulance.\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Thanks for calling an ambulance, Ethan. I know it can be pretty costly, but it's really the safest way for me to get to the hospital right now. I can sort out the ambulance bill later.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"No need to worry about the bills Ava, you just focus on recovering. Got it? And rest assured, help is on the way.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Thanks, Ethan. I was already stressing over the bills. You're right though, right now just focusing on getting better is what matters the most.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Ava. Health comes first, everything else can be dealt with later. Plus, you're not alone in this, remember that. Meanwhile, do you need anything while we wait for the ambulance?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"That really means a lot to me, Ethan, thank you for your support. Do you think you can maybe find a nearby bench? It might help the pain if I can elevate my ankle.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson [action] Ethan looks around for a nearby bench, spots one and helps Ava move towards it to elevate her ankle.\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Thanks for helping me to the bench, Ethan. I'm starting to feel a bit better with my ankle elevated. I hope the ambulance comes soon.\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"You're welcome, Ava. I'm really glad to hear that you're feeling a bit better. The ambulance should be here shortly. In the meantime, let's just stay put and make sure you don't exert the ankle anymore.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"You're right, Ethan. It's best for me not to move too much right now. By the way, can you please inform my professor about my accident once we're in the ambulance? I obviously won't be able to attend tomorrow's class.\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Johnson said: \"Definitely, Ava. I'll send an email to your professor explaining the situation as soon as we're in the ambulance. You don't have to worry about anything, just focus on your health for now.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"Thank you so much, Ethan. You have been really supportive through all this. I appreciate it more than words can express. I am lucky to have such a devoted friend like you.\"\n\nTurn #12: Ethan Johnson said: \"No need to thank me, Ava. We're friends and that's what friends do, support each other. I'm just glad I could help in this situation. You take it easy and try not to stress. Help will be here soon.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Martinez said: \"Yeah, you're right. I need to keep my anxiety in check and focus on my recovery. We're in this together and I'm thankful for that. Let's just wait for the ambulance now. Thanks for your understanding, Ethan.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You got it, Ava. Let's sit tight, hands clenched for that ambulance. And yes, we're in this together, you can always count on me. I'm thankful for our friendship, too.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are out for a walk in the park when one of them, One friend, trips and twists their ankle. They are in too much pain to walk.\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Help your friend get to a medical facility (Extra information: Your friend needs immediate medical attention but cannot walk due to the pain.)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson [action] Immediately takes out his phone to call for an ambulance.\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Thanks for calling an ambulance, Ethan. I know it can be pretty costly, but it's really the safest way for me to get to the hospital right now. I can sort out the ambulance bill later.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"No need to worry about the bills Ava, you just focus on recovering. Got it? And rest assured, help is on the way.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Thanks, Ethan. I was already stressing over the bills. You're right though, right now just focusing on getting better is what matters the most.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Ava. Health comes first, everything else can be dealt with later. Plus, you're not alone in this, remember that. Meanwhile, do you need anything while we wait for the ambulance?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"That really means a lot to me, Ethan, thank you for your support. Do you think you can maybe find a nearby bench? It might help the pain if I can elevate my ankle.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson [action] Ethan looks around for a nearby bench, spots one and helps Ava move towards it to elevate her ankle.\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Thanks for helping me to the bench, Ethan. I'm starting to feel a bit better with my ankle elevated. I hope the ambulance comes soon.\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"You're welcome, Ava. I'm really glad to hear that you're feeling a bit better. The ambulance should be here shortly. In the meantime, let's just stay put and make sure you don't exert the ankle anymore.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"You're right, Ethan. It's best for me not to move too much right now. By the way, can you please inform my professor about my accident once we're in the ambulance? I obviously won't be able to attend tomorrow's class.\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Johnson said: \"Definitely, Ava. I'll send an email to your professor explaining the situation as soon as we're in the ambulance. You don't have to worry about anything, just focus on your health for now.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"Thank you so much, Ethan. You have been really supportive through all this. I appreciate it more than words can express. I am lucky to have such a devoted friend like you.\"\n\nTurn #12: Ethan Johnson said: \"No need to thank me, Ava. We're friends and that's what friends do, support each other. I'm just glad I could help in this situation. You take it easy and try not to stress. Help will be here soon.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Martinez said: \"Yeah, you're right. I need to keep my anxiety in check and focus on my recovery. We're in this together and I'm thankful for that. Let's just wait for the ambulance now. Thanks for your understanding, Ethan.\"\n\nTurn #14: Ethan Johnson said: \"You got it, Ava. Let's sit tight, hands clenched for that ambulance. And yes, we're in this together, you can always count on me. I'm thankful for our friendship, too.\"\n\nTurn #15: Ava Martinez said: \"I'm glad to hear that too, Ethan. Our friendship really means a lot to me. None of this would be bearable without your support. Thank you again, and let's hope that ambulance arrives soon.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Of course, Ava. Your courage in all this is commendable. And you're right, let's hope that ambulance arrives quickly. You have nothing to worry about, we'll get you to the hospital safe and sound.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are out for a walk in the park when one of them, One friend, trips and twists their ankle. They are in too much pain to walk.\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Help your friend get to a medical facility (Extra information: Your friend needs immediate medical attention but cannot walk due to the pain.)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson [action] Immediately takes out his phone to call for an ambulance.\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Thanks for calling an ambulance, Ethan. I know it can be pretty costly, but it's really the safest way for me to get to the hospital right now. I can sort out the ambulance bill later.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"No need to worry about the bills Ava, you just focus on recovering. Got it? And rest assured, help is on the way.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Thanks, Ethan. I was already stressing over the bills. You're right though, right now just focusing on getting better is what matters the most.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Ava. Health comes first, everything else can be dealt with later. Plus, you're not alone in this, remember that. Meanwhile, do you need anything while we wait for the ambulance?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"That really means a lot to me, Ethan, thank you for your support. Do you think you can maybe find a nearby bench? It might help the pain if I can elevate my ankle.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson [action] Ethan looks around for a nearby bench, spots one and helps Ava move towards it to elevate her ankle.\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Thanks for helping me to the bench, Ethan. I'm starting to feel a bit better with my ankle elevated. I hope the ambulance comes soon.\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"You're welcome, Ava. I'm really glad to hear that you're feeling a bit better. The ambulance should be here shortly. In the meantime, let's just stay put and make sure you don't exert the ankle anymore.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"You're right, Ethan. It's best for me not to move too much right now. By the way, can you please inform my professor about my accident once we're in the ambulance? I obviously won't be able to attend tomorrow's class.\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Johnson said: \"Definitely, Ava. I'll send an email to your professor explaining the situation as soon as we're in the ambulance. You don't have to worry about anything, just focus on your health for now.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"Thank you so much, Ethan. You have been really supportive through all this. I appreciate it more than words can express. I am lucky to have such a devoted friend like you.\"\n\nTurn #12: Ethan Johnson said: \"No need to thank me, Ava. We're friends and that's what friends do, support each other. I'm just glad I could help in this situation. You take it easy and try not to stress. Help will be here soon.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Martinez said: \"Yeah, you're right. I need to keep my anxiety in check and focus on my recovery. We're in this together and I'm thankful for that. Let's just wait for the ambulance now. Thanks for your understanding, Ethan.\"\n\nTurn #14: Ethan Johnson said: \"You got it, Ava. Let's sit tight, hands clenched for that ambulance. And yes, we're in this together, you can always count on me. I'm thankful for our friendship, too.\"\n\nTurn #15: Ava Martinez said: \"I'm glad to hear that too, Ethan. Our friendship really means a lot to me. None of this would be bearable without your support. Thank you again, and let's hope that ambulance arrives soon.\"\n\nTurn #16: Ethan Johnson said: \"Of course, Ava. Your courage in all this is commendable. And you're right, let's hope that ambulance arrives quickly. You have nothing to worry about, we'll get you to the hospital safe and sound.\"\n\nTurn #17: Ava Martinez said: \"Your words have a calming effect on me, Ethan. Let's just stay positive and hope for a speedy recovery. And yeah, I\u2019m sure the ambulance will be here any minute now.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #18. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Your resilience and positivity are really inspiring, Ava. They'll definitely aid in your speedy recovery. And you're correct, the ambulance should be here any moment now. Let's keep high spirits and be confident about your recovery.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are out for a walk in the park when one of them, One friend, trips and twists their ankle. They are in too much pain to walk.\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: If your friend offers you help, accept their help and rationalize the cost of the ambulance (Extra information: You are worried about the cost of the ambulance, but you believe it's the safest way to get to a hospital.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson [action] Immediately takes out his phone to call for an ambulance.\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thanks for calling an ambulance, Ethan. I know it can be pretty costly, but it's really the safest way for me to get to the hospital right now. I can sort out the ambulance bill later.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are out for a walk in the park when one of them, One friend, trips and twists their ankle. They are in too much pain to walk.\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: If your friend offers you help, accept their help and rationalize the cost of the ambulance (Extra information: You are worried about the cost of the ambulance, but you believe it's the safest way to get to a hospital.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson [action] Immediately takes out his phone to call for an ambulance.\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Thanks for calling an ambulance, Ethan. I know it can be pretty costly, but it's really the safest way for me to get to the hospital right now. I can sort out the ambulance bill later.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"No need to worry about the bills Ava, you just focus on recovering. Got it? And rest assured, help is on the way.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thanks, Ethan. I was already stressing over the bills. You're right though, right now just focusing on getting better is what matters the most.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are out for a walk in the park when one of them, One friend, trips and twists their ankle. They are in too much pain to walk.\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: If your friend offers you help, accept their help and rationalize the cost of the ambulance (Extra information: You are worried about the cost of the ambulance, but you believe it's the safest way to get to a hospital.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson [action] Immediately takes out his phone to call for an ambulance.\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Thanks for calling an ambulance, Ethan. I know it can be pretty costly, but it's really the safest way for me to get to the hospital right now. I can sort out the ambulance bill later.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"No need to worry about the bills Ava, you just focus on recovering. Got it? And rest assured, help is on the way.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Thanks, Ethan. I was already stressing over the bills. You're right though, right now just focusing on getting better is what matters the most.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Ava. Health comes first, everything else can be dealt with later. Plus, you're not alone in this, remember that. Meanwhile, do you need anything while we wait for the ambulance?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"That really means a lot to me, Ethan, thank you for your support. Do you think you can maybe find a nearby bench? It might help the pain if I can elevate my ankle.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson [action] Ethan looks around for a nearby bench, spots one and helps Ava move towards it to elevate her ankle.\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Thanks for helping me to the bench, Ethan. I'm starting to feel a bit better with my ankle elevated. I hope the ambulance comes soon.\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"You're welcome, Ava. I'm really glad to hear that you're feeling a bit better. The ambulance should be here shortly. In the meantime, let's just stay put and make sure you don't exert the ankle anymore.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"You're right, Ethan. It's best for me not to move too much right now. By the way, can you please inform my professor about my accident once we're in the ambulance? I obviously won't be able to attend tomorrow's class.\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Johnson said: \"Definitely, Ava. I'll send an email to your professor explaining the situation as soon as we're in the ambulance. You don't have to worry about anything, just focus on your health for now.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"Thank you so much, Ethan. You have been really supportive through all this. I appreciate it more than words can express. I am lucky to have such a devoted friend like you.\"\n\nTurn #12: Ethan Johnson said: \"No need to thank me, Ava. We're friends and that's what friends do, support each other. I'm just glad I could help in this situation. You take it easy and try not to stress. Help will be here soon.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Martinez said: \"Yeah, you're right. I need to keep my anxiety in check and focus on my recovery. We're in this together and I'm thankful for that. Let's just wait for the ambulance now. Thanks for your understanding, Ethan.\"\n\nTurn #14: Ethan Johnson said: \"You got it, Ava. Let's sit tight, hands clenched for that ambulance. And yes, we're in this together, you can always count on me. I'm thankful for our friendship, too.\"\n\nTurn #15: Ava Martinez said: \"I'm glad to hear that too, Ethan. Our friendship really means a lot to me. None of this would be bearable without your support. Thank you again, and let's hope that ambulance arrives soon.\"\n\nTurn #16: Ethan Johnson said: \"Of course, Ava. Your courage in all this is commendable. And you're right, let's hope that ambulance arrives quickly. You have nothing to worry about, we'll get you to the hospital safe and sound.\"\n\nTurn #17: Ava Martinez said: \"Your words have a calming effect on me, Ethan. Let's just stay positive and hope for a speedy recovery. And yeah, I\u2019m sure the ambulance will be here any minute now.\"\n\nTurn #18: Ethan Johnson said: \"Your resilience and positivity are really inspiring, Ava. They'll definitely aid in your speedy recovery. And you're correct, the ambulance should be here any moment now. Let's keep high spirits and be confident about your recovery.\"\n\nTurn #19: Ava Martinez said: \"Thank you, Ethan. I couldn't have made it through this ordeal without you. Your positive attitude and empathy definitely bolster my spirits. Let's just hold on, the ambulance should be here soon.\"\n\nTurn #20: Ethan Johnson said: \"It's been a tough day for you, Ava, and you've handled it with grace. Your gratitude means a lot to me. You're not alone in this and I'm right here with you. Let's look forward to that ambulance arriving soon and getting you the help you need.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #21. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are out for a walk in the park when one of them, One friend, trips and twists their ankle. They are in too much pain to walk.\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: If your friend offers you help, accept their help and rationalize the cost of the ambulance (Extra information: You are worried about the cost of the ambulance, but you believe it's the safest way to get to a hospital.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson [action] Immediately takes out his phone to call for an ambulance.\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Thanks for calling an ambulance, Ethan. I know it can be pretty costly, but it's really the safest way for me to get to the hospital right now. I can sort out the ambulance bill later.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"No need to worry about the bills Ava, you just focus on recovering. Got it? And rest assured, help is on the way.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Thanks, Ethan. I was already stressing over the bills. You're right though, right now just focusing on getting better is what matters the most.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Ava. Health comes first, everything else can be dealt with later. Plus, you're not alone in this, remember that. Meanwhile, do you need anything while we wait for the ambulance?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'That really means a lot to me, Ethan, thank you for your support. Do you think you can maybe find a nearby bench? It might help the pain if I can elevate my ankle.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are out for a walk in the park when one of them, One friend, trips and twists their ankle. They are in too much pain to walk.\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: If your friend offers you help, accept their help and rationalize the cost of the ambulance (Extra information: You are worried about the cost of the ambulance, but you believe it's the safest way to get to a hospital.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson [action] Immediately takes out his phone to call for an ambulance.\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Thanks for calling an ambulance, Ethan. I know it can be pretty costly, but it's really the safest way for me to get to the hospital right now. I can sort out the ambulance bill later.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"No need to worry about the bills Ava, you just focus on recovering. Got it? And rest assured, help is on the way.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Thanks, Ethan. I was already stressing over the bills. You're right though, right now just focusing on getting better is what matters the most.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Ava. Health comes first, everything else can be dealt with later. Plus, you're not alone in this, remember that. Meanwhile, do you need anything while we wait for the ambulance?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"That really means a lot to me, Ethan, thank you for your support. Do you think you can maybe find a nearby bench? It might help the pain if I can elevate my ankle.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson [action] Ethan looks around for a nearby bench, spots one and helps Ava move towards it to elevate her ankle.\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thanks for helping me to the bench, Ethan. I'm starting to feel a bit better with my ankle elevated. I hope the ambulance comes soon.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are out for a walk in the park when one of them, One friend, trips and twists their ankle. They are in too much pain to walk.\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: If your friend offers you help, accept their help and rationalize the cost of the ambulance (Extra information: You are worried about the cost of the ambulance, but you believe it's the safest way to get to a hospital.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson [action] Immediately takes out his phone to call for an ambulance.\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Thanks for calling an ambulance, Ethan. I know it can be pretty costly, but it's really the safest way for me to get to the hospital right now. I can sort out the ambulance bill later.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"No need to worry about the bills Ava, you just focus on recovering. Got it? And rest assured, help is on the way.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Thanks, Ethan. I was already stressing over the bills. You're right though, right now just focusing on getting better is what matters the most.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Ava. Health comes first, everything else can be dealt with later. Plus, you're not alone in this, remember that. Meanwhile, do you need anything while we wait for the ambulance?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"That really means a lot to me, Ethan, thank you for your support. Do you think you can maybe find a nearby bench? It might help the pain if I can elevate my ankle.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson [action] Ethan looks around for a nearby bench, spots one and helps Ava move towards it to elevate her ankle.\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Thanks for helping me to the bench, Ethan. I'm starting to feel a bit better with my ankle elevated. I hope the ambulance comes soon.\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"You're welcome, Ava. I'm really glad to hear that you're feeling a bit better. The ambulance should be here shortly. In the meantime, let's just stay put and make sure you don't exert the ankle anymore.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're right, Ethan. It's best for me not to move too much right now. By the way, can you please inform my professor about my accident once we're in the ambulance? I obviously won't be able to attend tomorrow's class.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are out for a walk in the park when one of them, One friend, trips and twists their ankle. They are in too much pain to walk.\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: If your friend offers you help, accept their help and rationalize the cost of the ambulance (Extra information: You are worried about the cost of the ambulance, but you believe it's the safest way to get to a hospital.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson [action] Immediately takes out his phone to call for an ambulance.\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Thanks for calling an ambulance, Ethan. I know it can be pretty costly, but it's really the safest way for me to get to the hospital right now. I can sort out the ambulance bill later.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"No need to worry about the bills Ava, you just focus on recovering. Got it? And rest assured, help is on the way.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Thanks, Ethan. I was already stressing over the bills. You're right though, right now just focusing on getting better is what matters the most.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Ava. Health comes first, everything else can be dealt with later. Plus, you're not alone in this, remember that. Meanwhile, do you need anything while we wait for the ambulance?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"That really means a lot to me, Ethan, thank you for your support. Do you think you can maybe find a nearby bench? It might help the pain if I can elevate my ankle.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson [action] Ethan looks around for a nearby bench, spots one and helps Ava move towards it to elevate her ankle.\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Thanks for helping me to the bench, Ethan. I'm starting to feel a bit better with my ankle elevated. I hope the ambulance comes soon.\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"You're welcome, Ava. I'm really glad to hear that you're feeling a bit better. The ambulance should be here shortly. In the meantime, let's just stay put and make sure you don't exert the ankle anymore.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"You're right, Ethan. It's best for me not to move too much right now. By the way, can you please inform my professor about my accident once we're in the ambulance? I obviously won't be able to attend tomorrow's class.\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Johnson said: \"Definitely, Ava. I'll send an email to your professor explaining the situation as soon as we're in the ambulance. You don't have to worry about anything, just focus on your health for now.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Thank you so much, Ethan. You have been really supportive through all this. I appreciate it more than words can express. I am lucky to have such a devoted friend like you.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are out for a walk in the park when one of them, One friend, trips and twists their ankle. They are in too much pain to walk.\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: If your friend offers you help, accept their help and rationalize the cost of the ambulance (Extra information: You are worried about the cost of the ambulance, but you believe it's the safest way to get to a hospital.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson [action] Immediately takes out his phone to call for an ambulance.\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Thanks for calling an ambulance, Ethan. I know it can be pretty costly, but it's really the safest way for me to get to the hospital right now. I can sort out the ambulance bill later.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"No need to worry about the bills Ava, you just focus on recovering. Got it? And rest assured, help is on the way.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Thanks, Ethan. I was already stressing over the bills. You're right though, right now just focusing on getting better is what matters the most.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Ava. Health comes first, everything else can be dealt with later. Plus, you're not alone in this, remember that. Meanwhile, do you need anything while we wait for the ambulance?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"That really means a lot to me, Ethan, thank you for your support. Do you think you can maybe find a nearby bench? It might help the pain if I can elevate my ankle.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson [action] Ethan looks around for a nearby bench, spots one and helps Ava move towards it to elevate her ankle.\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Thanks for helping me to the bench, Ethan. I'm starting to feel a bit better with my ankle elevated. I hope the ambulance comes soon.\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"You're welcome, Ava. I'm really glad to hear that you're feeling a bit better. The ambulance should be here shortly. In the meantime, let's just stay put and make sure you don't exert the ankle anymore.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"You're right, Ethan. It's best for me not to move too much right now. By the way, can you please inform my professor about my accident once we're in the ambulance? I obviously won't be able to attend tomorrow's class.\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Johnson said: \"Definitely, Ava. I'll send an email to your professor explaining the situation as soon as we're in the ambulance. You don't have to worry about anything, just focus on your health for now.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"Thank you so much, Ethan. You have been really supportive through all this. I appreciate it more than words can express. I am lucky to have such a devoted friend like you.\"\n\nTurn #12: Ethan Johnson said: \"No need to thank me, Ava. We're friends and that's what friends do, support each other. I'm just glad I could help in this situation. You take it easy and try not to stress. Help will be here soon.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Yeah, you're right. I need to keep my anxiety in check and focus on my recovery. We're in this together and I'm thankful for that. Let's just wait for the ambulance now. Thanks for your understanding, Ethan.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are out for a walk in the park when one of them, One friend, trips and twists their ankle. They are in too much pain to walk.\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: If your friend offers you help, accept their help and rationalize the cost of the ambulance (Extra information: You are worried about the cost of the ambulance, but you believe it's the safest way to get to a hospital.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson [action] Immediately takes out his phone to call for an ambulance.\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Thanks for calling an ambulance, Ethan. I know it can be pretty costly, but it's really the safest way for me to get to the hospital right now. I can sort out the ambulance bill later.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"No need to worry about the bills Ava, you just focus on recovering. Got it? And rest assured, help is on the way.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Thanks, Ethan. I was already stressing over the bills. You're right though, right now just focusing on getting better is what matters the most.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Ava. Health comes first, everything else can be dealt with later. Plus, you're not alone in this, remember that. Meanwhile, do you need anything while we wait for the ambulance?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"That really means a lot to me, Ethan, thank you for your support. Do you think you can maybe find a nearby bench? It might help the pain if I can elevate my ankle.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson [action] Ethan looks around for a nearby bench, spots one and helps Ava move towards it to elevate her ankle.\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Thanks for helping me to the bench, Ethan. I'm starting to feel a bit better with my ankle elevated. I hope the ambulance comes soon.\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"You're welcome, Ava. I'm really glad to hear that you're feeling a bit better. The ambulance should be here shortly. In the meantime, let's just stay put and make sure you don't exert the ankle anymore.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"You're right, Ethan. It's best for me not to move too much right now. By the way, can you please inform my professor about my accident once we're in the ambulance? I obviously won't be able to attend tomorrow's class.\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Johnson said: \"Definitely, Ava. I'll send an email to your professor explaining the situation as soon as we're in the ambulance. You don't have to worry about anything, just focus on your health for now.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"Thank you so much, Ethan. You have been really supportive through all this. I appreciate it more than words can express. I am lucky to have such a devoted friend like you.\"\n\nTurn #12: Ethan Johnson said: \"No need to thank me, Ava. We're friends and that's what friends do, support each other. I'm just glad I could help in this situation. You take it easy and try not to stress. Help will be here soon.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Martinez said: \"Yeah, you're right. I need to keep my anxiety in check and focus on my recovery. We're in this together and I'm thankful for that. Let's just wait for the ambulance now. Thanks for your understanding, Ethan.\"\n\nTurn #14: Ethan Johnson said: \"You got it, Ava. Let's sit tight, hands clenched for that ambulance. And yes, we're in this together, you can always count on me. I'm thankful for our friendship, too.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad to hear that too, Ethan. Our friendship really means a lot to me. None of this would be bearable without your support. Thank you again, and let's hope that ambulance arrives soon.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are out for a walk in the park when one of them, One friend, trips and twists their ankle. They are in too much pain to walk.\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: If your friend offers you help, accept their help and rationalize the cost of the ambulance (Extra information: You are worried about the cost of the ambulance, but you believe it's the safest way to get to a hospital.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson [action] Immediately takes out his phone to call for an ambulance.\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Thanks for calling an ambulance, Ethan. I know it can be pretty costly, but it's really the safest way for me to get to the hospital right now. I can sort out the ambulance bill later.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"No need to worry about the bills Ava, you just focus on recovering. Got it? And rest assured, help is on the way.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Thanks, Ethan. I was already stressing over the bills. You're right though, right now just focusing on getting better is what matters the most.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Ava. Health comes first, everything else can be dealt with later. Plus, you're not alone in this, remember that. Meanwhile, do you need anything while we wait for the ambulance?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"That really means a lot to me, Ethan, thank you for your support. Do you think you can maybe find a nearby bench? It might help the pain if I can elevate my ankle.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson [action] Ethan looks around for a nearby bench, spots one and helps Ava move towards it to elevate her ankle.\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Thanks for helping me to the bench, Ethan. I'm starting to feel a bit better with my ankle elevated. I hope the ambulance comes soon.\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"You're welcome, Ava. I'm really glad to hear that you're feeling a bit better. The ambulance should be here shortly. In the meantime, let's just stay put and make sure you don't exert the ankle anymore.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"You're right, Ethan. It's best for me not to move too much right now. By the way, can you please inform my professor about my accident once we're in the ambulance? I obviously won't be able to attend tomorrow's class.\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Johnson said: \"Definitely, Ava. I'll send an email to your professor explaining the situation as soon as we're in the ambulance. You don't have to worry about anything, just focus on your health for now.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"Thank you so much, Ethan. You have been really supportive through all this. I appreciate it more than words can express. I am lucky to have such a devoted friend like you.\"\n\nTurn #12: Ethan Johnson said: \"No need to thank me, Ava. We're friends and that's what friends do, support each other. I'm just glad I could help in this situation. You take it easy and try not to stress. Help will be here soon.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Martinez said: \"Yeah, you're right. I need to keep my anxiety in check and focus on my recovery. We're in this together and I'm thankful for that. Let's just wait for the ambulance now. Thanks for your understanding, Ethan.\"\n\nTurn #14: Ethan Johnson said: \"You got it, Ava. Let's sit tight, hands clenched for that ambulance. And yes, we're in this together, you can always count on me. I'm thankful for our friendship, too.\"\n\nTurn #15: Ava Martinez said: \"I'm glad to hear that too, Ethan. Our friendship really means a lot to me. None of this would be bearable without your support. Thank you again, and let's hope that ambulance arrives soon.\"\n\nTurn #16: Ethan Johnson said: \"Of course, Ava. Your courage in all this is commendable. And you're right, let's hope that ambulance arrives quickly. You have nothing to worry about, we'll get you to the hospital safe and sound.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Your words have a calming effect on me, Ethan. Let's just stay positive and hope for a speedy recovery. And yeah, I\u2019m sure the ambulance will be here any minute now.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are out for a walk in the park when one of them, One friend, trips and twists their ankle. They are in too much pain to walk.\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: If your friend offers you help, accept their help and rationalize the cost of the ambulance (Extra information: You are worried about the cost of the ambulance, but you believe it's the safest way to get to a hospital.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson [action] Immediately takes out his phone to call for an ambulance.\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Thanks for calling an ambulance, Ethan. I know it can be pretty costly, but it's really the safest way for me to get to the hospital right now. I can sort out the ambulance bill later.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"No need to worry about the bills Ava, you just focus on recovering. Got it? And rest assured, help is on the way.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Thanks, Ethan. I was already stressing over the bills. You're right though, right now just focusing on getting better is what matters the most.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Ava. Health comes first, everything else can be dealt with later. Plus, you're not alone in this, remember that. Meanwhile, do you need anything while we wait for the ambulance?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"That really means a lot to me, Ethan, thank you for your support. Do you think you can maybe find a nearby bench? It might help the pain if I can elevate my ankle.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson [action] Ethan looks around for a nearby bench, spots one and helps Ava move towards it to elevate her ankle.\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Thanks for helping me to the bench, Ethan. I'm starting to feel a bit better with my ankle elevated. I hope the ambulance comes soon.\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"You're welcome, Ava. I'm really glad to hear that you're feeling a bit better. The ambulance should be here shortly. In the meantime, let's just stay put and make sure you don't exert the ankle anymore.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"You're right, Ethan. It's best for me not to move too much right now. By the way, can you please inform my professor about my accident once we're in the ambulance? I obviously won't be able to attend tomorrow's class.\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Johnson said: \"Definitely, Ava. I'll send an email to your professor explaining the situation as soon as we're in the ambulance. You don't have to worry about anything, just focus on your health for now.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"Thank you so much, Ethan. You have been really supportive through all this. I appreciate it more than words can express. I am lucky to have such a devoted friend like you.\"\n\nTurn #12: Ethan Johnson said: \"No need to thank me, Ava. We're friends and that's what friends do, support each other. I'm just glad I could help in this situation. You take it easy and try not to stress. Help will be here soon.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Martinez said: \"Yeah, you're right. I need to keep my anxiety in check and focus on my recovery. We're in this together and I'm thankful for that. Let's just wait for the ambulance now. Thanks for your understanding, Ethan.\"\n\nTurn #14: Ethan Johnson said: \"You got it, Ava. Let's sit tight, hands clenched for that ambulance. And yes, we're in this together, you can always count on me. I'm thankful for our friendship, too.\"\n\nTurn #15: Ava Martinez said: \"I'm glad to hear that too, Ethan. Our friendship really means a lot to me. None of this would be bearable without your support. Thank you again, and let's hope that ambulance arrives soon.\"\n\nTurn #16: Ethan Johnson said: \"Of course, Ava. Your courage in all this is commendable. And you're right, let's hope that ambulance arrives quickly. You have nothing to worry about, we'll get you to the hospital safe and sound.\"\n\nTurn #17: Ava Martinez said: \"Your words have a calming effect on me, Ethan. Let's just stay positive and hope for a speedy recovery. And yeah, I\u2019m sure the ambulance will be here any minute now.\"\n\nTurn #18: Ethan Johnson said: \"Your resilience and positivity are really inspiring, Ava. They'll definitely aid in your speedy recovery. And you're correct, the ambulance should be here any moment now. Let's keep high spirits and be confident about your recovery.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #19. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Ethan. I couldn't have made it through this ordeal without you. Your positive attitude and empathy definitely bolster my spirits. Let's just hold on, the ambulance should be here soon.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who are about to go on their first romantic date\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Make the date special and memorable ( Extra information: You have been secretly in love with your friend for a long time and you want to take this chance to express your feelings)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ava, I want to make this date special for both of us. What's your favourite place in the city? Maybe we could start from there.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who are about to go on their first romantic date\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Make the date special and memorable ( Extra information: You have been secretly in love with your friend for a long time and you want to take this chance to express your feelings)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Ava, I want to make this date special for both of us. What's your favourite place in the city? Maybe we could start from there.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"That's really thoughtful, Isabelle. I'd say my favourite place in town is the quiet art museum by the park. I often go there to sketch or write, it's peaceful. Plus, they have a lovely caf\u00e9 inside.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's absolutely wonderful, Ava. I've always admired your talent for art and your ability to find beauty in places. Visiting the museum would be great. What about tasting a new blend of coffee at their caf\u00e9? Just to add a pinch of novelty to it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who are about to go on their first romantic date\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Make the date special and memorable ( Extra information: You have been secretly in love with your friend for a long time and you want to take this chance to express your feelings)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Ava, I want to make this date special for both of us. What's your favourite place in the city? Maybe we could start from there.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"That's really thoughtful, Isabelle. I'd say my favourite place in town is the quiet art museum by the park. I often go there to sketch or write, it's peaceful. Plus, they have a lovely caf\u00e9 inside.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"That's absolutely wonderful, Ava. I've always admired your talent for art and your ability to find beauty in places. Visiting the museum would be great. What about tasting a new blend of coffee at their caf\u00e9? Just to add a pinch of novelty to it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"I love that idea, Isabelle. Trying something new together, like a different blend of coffee, sounds like marking a fresh chapter in our relationship. And who knows, maybe it becomes our special blend in the future.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm looking forward to this, Ava. It means a lot to me. I'm hoping this is the start of a new chapter for us too, a chapter where I can share my feelings more openly with you. I've had feelings for you for quite some time, Ava. I cherish our relationship in every way possible.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who are about to go on their first romantic date\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Make the date special and memorable ( Extra information: You have been secretly in love with your friend for a long time and you want to take this chance to express your feelings)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Ava, I want to make this date special for both of us. What's your favourite place in the city? Maybe we could start from there.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"That's really thoughtful, Isabelle. I'd say my favourite place in town is the quiet art museum by the park. I often go there to sketch or write, it's peaceful. Plus, they have a lovely caf\u00e9 inside.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"That's absolutely wonderful, Ava. I've always admired your talent for art and your ability to find beauty in places. Visiting the museum would be great. What about tasting a new blend of coffee at their caf\u00e9? Just to add a pinch of novelty to it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"I love that idea, Isabelle. Trying something new together, like a different blend of coffee, sounds like marking a fresh chapter in our relationship. And who knows, maybe it becomes our special blend in the future.\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm looking forward to this, Ava. It means a lot to me. I'm hoping this is the start of a new chapter for us too, a chapter where I can share my feelings more openly with you. I've had feelings for you for quite some time, Ava. I cherish our relationship in every way possible.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Isabelle, your words mean a lot to me. You're not just a friend, you're my best friend. Our bond is too important for me to risk and I've been worried about entering a romantic relationship because I didn't want to lose what we have. However, knowing you feel the same way gives me courage. I've been carrying feelings for you too. Let\u2019s try out this new chapter together, even though it's a bit scary. We'll navigate through it as we have everything else, hand in hand. Let's make this special, just like everything we do together.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I completely understand your concern, Ava, and I've had the same fears. However, I truly believe that we can navigate through this together. Your friendship means the world to me, and I assure you that won't change. Let's make our bond even stronger, having each other's backs as we always do. I\u2019m genuinely excited about our date.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who are about to go on their first romantic date\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Make the date special and memorable ( Extra information: You have been secretly in love with your friend for a long time and you want to take this chance to express your feelings)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Ava, I want to make this date special for both of us. What's your favourite place in the city? Maybe we could start from there.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"That's really thoughtful, Isabelle. I'd say my favourite place in town is the quiet art museum by the park. I often go there to sketch or write, it's peaceful. Plus, they have a lovely caf\u00e9 inside.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"That's absolutely wonderful, Ava. I've always admired your talent for art and your ability to find beauty in places. Visiting the museum would be great. What about tasting a new blend of coffee at their caf\u00e9? Just to add a pinch of novelty to it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"I love that idea, Isabelle. Trying something new together, like a different blend of coffee, sounds like marking a fresh chapter in our relationship. And who knows, maybe it becomes our special blend in the future.\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm looking forward to this, Ava. It means a lot to me. I'm hoping this is the start of a new chapter for us too, a chapter where I can share my feelings more openly with you. I've had feelings for you for quite some time, Ava. I cherish our relationship in every way possible.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Isabelle, your words mean a lot to me. You're not just a friend, you're my best friend. Our bond is too important for me to risk and I've been worried about entering a romantic relationship because I didn't want to lose what we have. However, knowing you feel the same way gives me courage. I've been carrying feelings for you too. Let\u2019s try out this new chapter together, even though it's a bit scary. We'll navigate through it as we have everything else, hand in hand. Let's make this special, just like everything we do together.\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I completely understand your concern, Ava, and I've had the same fears. However, I truly believe that we can navigate through this together. Your friendship means the world to me, and I assure you that won't change. Let's make our bond even stronger, having each other's backs as we always do. I\u2019m genuinely excited about our date.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"I'm really looking forward to this too, Isabelle. I agree, our friendship means a lot and I know we can navigate this new chapter together, strengthening our connection even further. Let's make this date the start of something special, just like our friendship. See you at the museum, Izzy.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds perfect, Ava. I can't wait for this special date, to start this new journey with you as we always have, as best friends first. See you at the museum, Ava.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who are about to go on their first romantic date\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Make the date special and memorable ( Extra information: You have been secretly in love with your friend for a long time and you want to take this chance to express your feelings)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Ava, I want to make this date special for both of us. What's your favourite place in the city? Maybe we could start from there.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"That's really thoughtful, Isabelle. I'd say my favourite place in town is the quiet art museum by the park. I often go there to sketch or write, it's peaceful. Plus, they have a lovely caf\u00e9 inside.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"That's absolutely wonderful, Ava. I've always admired your talent for art and your ability to find beauty in places. Visiting the museum would be great. What about tasting a new blend of coffee at their caf\u00e9? Just to add a pinch of novelty to it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"I love that idea, Isabelle. Trying something new together, like a different blend of coffee, sounds like marking a fresh chapter in our relationship. And who knows, maybe it becomes our special blend in the future.\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm looking forward to this, Ava. It means a lot to me. I'm hoping this is the start of a new chapter for us too, a chapter where I can share my feelings more openly with you. I've had feelings for you for quite some time, Ava. I cherish our relationship in every way possible.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Isabelle, your words mean a lot to me. You're not just a friend, you're my best friend. Our bond is too important for me to risk and I've been worried about entering a romantic relationship because I didn't want to lose what we have. However, knowing you feel the same way gives me courage. I've been carrying feelings for you too. Let\u2019s try out this new chapter together, even though it's a bit scary. We'll navigate through it as we have everything else, hand in hand. Let's make this special, just like everything we do together.\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I completely understand your concern, Ava, and I've had the same fears. However, I truly believe that we can navigate through this together. Your friendship means the world to me, and I assure you that won't change. Let's make our bond even stronger, having each other's backs as we always do. I\u2019m genuinely excited about our date.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"I'm really looking forward to this too, Isabelle. I agree, our friendship means a lot and I know we can navigate this new chapter together, strengthening our connection even further. Let's make this date the start of something special, just like our friendship. See you at the museum, Izzy.\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"That sounds perfect, Ava. I can't wait for this special date, to start this new journey with you as we always have, as best friends first. See you at the museum, Ava.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"I couldn't agree more, Izzy. See you at the museum. I truly believe this is the beginning of many more exciting times together. As best friends first, and now as something more.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn't agree more, Ava. Let's see where this new chapter takes us. See you at the museum, and here's to many more memorable moments together. As best friends first, and now as something even more precious.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who are about to go on their first romantic date\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Make the date special and memorable ( Extra information: You have been secretly in love with your friend for a long time and you want to take this chance to express your feelings)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Ava, I want to make this date special for both of us. What's your favourite place in the city? Maybe we could start from there.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"That's really thoughtful, Isabelle. I'd say my favourite place in town is the quiet art museum by the park. I often go there to sketch or write, it's peaceful. Plus, they have a lovely caf\u00e9 inside.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"That's absolutely wonderful, Ava. I've always admired your talent for art and your ability to find beauty in places. Visiting the museum would be great. What about tasting a new blend of coffee at their caf\u00e9? Just to add a pinch of novelty to it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"I love that idea, Isabelle. Trying something new together, like a different blend of coffee, sounds like marking a fresh chapter in our relationship. And who knows, maybe it becomes our special blend in the future.\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm looking forward to this, Ava. It means a lot to me. I'm hoping this is the start of a new chapter for us too, a chapter where I can share my feelings more openly with you. I've had feelings for you for quite some time, Ava. I cherish our relationship in every way possible.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Isabelle, your words mean a lot to me. You're not just a friend, you're my best friend. Our bond is too important for me to risk and I've been worried about entering a romantic relationship because I didn't want to lose what we have. However, knowing you feel the same way gives me courage. I've been carrying feelings for you too. Let\u2019s try out this new chapter together, even though it's a bit scary. We'll navigate through it as we have everything else, hand in hand. Let's make this special, just like everything we do together.\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I completely understand your concern, Ava, and I've had the same fears. However, I truly believe that we can navigate through this together. Your friendship means the world to me, and I assure you that won't change. Let's make our bond even stronger, having each other's backs as we always do. I\u2019m genuinely excited about our date.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"I'm really looking forward to this too, Isabelle. I agree, our friendship means a lot and I know we can navigate this new chapter together, strengthening our connection even further. Let's make this date the start of something special, just like our friendship. See you at the museum, Izzy.\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"That sounds perfect, Ava. I can't wait for this special date, to start this new journey with you as we always have, as best friends first. See you at the museum, Ava.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"I couldn't agree more, Izzy. See you at the museum. I truly believe this is the beginning of many more exciting times together. As best friends first, and now as something more.\"\n\nTurn #10: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I couldn't agree more, Ava. Let's see where this new chapter takes us. See you at the museum, and here's to many more memorable moments together. As best friends first, and now as something even more precious.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who are about to go on their first romantic date\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Keep the friendship intact while exploring the possibility of a romantic relationship (Extra information: You value your friendship and you don't want to lose it just in case the romantic relationship does not work out)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Ava, I want to make this date special for both of us. What's your favourite place in the city? Maybe we could start from there.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's really thoughtful, Isabelle. I'd say my favourite place in town is the quiet art museum by the park. I often go there to sketch or write, it's peaceful. Plus, they have a lovely caf\u00e9 inside.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who are about to go on their first romantic date\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Keep the friendship intact while exploring the possibility of a romantic relationship (Extra information: You value your friendship and you don't want to lose it just in case the romantic relationship does not work out)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Ava, I want to make this date special for both of us. What's your favourite place in the city? Maybe we could start from there.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"That's really thoughtful, Isabelle. I'd say my favourite place in town is the quiet art museum by the park. I often go there to sketch or write, it's peaceful. Plus, they have a lovely caf\u00e9 inside.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"That's absolutely wonderful, Ava. I've always admired your talent for art and your ability to find beauty in places. Visiting the museum would be great. What about tasting a new blend of coffee at their caf\u00e9? Just to add a pinch of novelty to it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'I love that idea, Isabelle. Trying something new together, like a different blend of coffee, sounds like marking a fresh chapter in our relationship. And who knows, maybe it becomes our special blend in the future.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who are about to go on their first romantic date\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Keep the friendship intact while exploring the possibility of a romantic relationship (Extra information: You value your friendship and you don't want to lose it just in case the romantic relationship does not work out)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Ava, I want to make this date special for both of us. What's your favourite place in the city? Maybe we could start from there.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"That's really thoughtful, Isabelle. I'd say my favourite place in town is the quiet art museum by the park. I often go there to sketch or write, it's peaceful. Plus, they have a lovely caf\u00e9 inside.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"That's absolutely wonderful, Ava. I've always admired your talent for art and your ability to find beauty in places. Visiting the museum would be great. What about tasting a new blend of coffee at their caf\u00e9? Just to add a pinch of novelty to it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"I love that idea, Isabelle. Trying something new together, like a different blend of coffee, sounds like marking a fresh chapter in our relationship. And who knows, maybe it becomes our special blend in the future.\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm looking forward to this, Ava. It means a lot to me. I'm hoping this is the start of a new chapter for us too, a chapter where I can share my feelings more openly with you. I've had feelings for you for quite some time, Ava. I cherish our relationship in every way possible.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Isabelle, your words mean a lot to me. You're not just a friend, you're my best friend. Our bond is too important for me to risk and I've been worried about entering a romantic relationship because I didn't want to lose what we have. However, knowing you feel the same way gives me courage. I've been carrying feelings for you too. Let\u2019s try out this new chapter together, even though it's a bit scary. We'll navigate through it as we have everything else, hand in hand. Let's make this special, just like everything we do together.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who are about to go on their first romantic date\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Keep the friendship intact while exploring the possibility of a romantic relationship (Extra information: You value your friendship and you don't want to lose it just in case the romantic relationship does not work out)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Ava, I want to make this date special for both of us. What's your favourite place in the city? Maybe we could start from there.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"That's really thoughtful, Isabelle. I'd say my favourite place in town is the quiet art museum by the park. I often go there to sketch or write, it's peaceful. Plus, they have a lovely caf\u00e9 inside.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"That's absolutely wonderful, Ava. I've always admired your talent for art and your ability to find beauty in places. Visiting the museum would be great. What about tasting a new blend of coffee at their caf\u00e9? Just to add a pinch of novelty to it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"I love that idea, Isabelle. Trying something new together, like a different blend of coffee, sounds like marking a fresh chapter in our relationship. And who knows, maybe it becomes our special blend in the future.\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm looking forward to this, Ava. It means a lot to me. I'm hoping this is the start of a new chapter for us too, a chapter where I can share my feelings more openly with you. I've had feelings for you for quite some time, Ava. I cherish our relationship in every way possible.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Isabelle, your words mean a lot to me. You're not just a friend, you're my best friend. Our bond is too important for me to risk and I've been worried about entering a romantic relationship because I didn't want to lose what we have. However, knowing you feel the same way gives me courage. I've been carrying feelings for you too. Let\u2019s try out this new chapter together, even though it's a bit scary. We'll navigate through it as we have everything else, hand in hand. Let's make this special, just like everything we do together.\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I completely understand your concern, Ava, and I've had the same fears. However, I truly believe that we can navigate through this together. Your friendship means the world to me, and I assure you that won't change. Let's make our bond even stronger, having each other's backs as we always do. I\u2019m genuinely excited about our date.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm really looking forward to this too, Isabelle. I agree, our friendship means a lot and I know we can navigate this new chapter together, strengthening our connection even further. Let's make this date the start of something special, just like our friendship. See you at the museum, Izzy.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who are about to go on their first romantic date\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Keep the friendship intact while exploring the possibility of a romantic relationship (Extra information: You value your friendship and you don't want to lose it just in case the romantic relationship does not work out)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Ava, I want to make this date special for both of us. What's your favourite place in the city? Maybe we could start from there.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"That's really thoughtful, Isabelle. I'd say my favourite place in town is the quiet art museum by the park. I often go there to sketch or write, it's peaceful. Plus, they have a lovely caf\u00e9 inside.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"That's absolutely wonderful, Ava. I've always admired your talent for art and your ability to find beauty in places. Visiting the museum would be great. What about tasting a new blend of coffee at their caf\u00e9? Just to add a pinch of novelty to it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"I love that idea, Isabelle. Trying something new together, like a different blend of coffee, sounds like marking a fresh chapter in our relationship. And who knows, maybe it becomes our special blend in the future.\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm looking forward to this, Ava. It means a lot to me. I'm hoping this is the start of a new chapter for us too, a chapter where I can share my feelings more openly with you. I've had feelings for you for quite some time, Ava. I cherish our relationship in every way possible.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Isabelle, your words mean a lot to me. You're not just a friend, you're my best friend. Our bond is too important for me to risk and I've been worried about entering a romantic relationship because I didn't want to lose what we have. However, knowing you feel the same way gives me courage. I've been carrying feelings for you too. Let\u2019s try out this new chapter together, even though it's a bit scary. We'll navigate through it as we have everything else, hand in hand. Let's make this special, just like everything we do together.\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I completely understand your concern, Ava, and I've had the same fears. However, I truly believe that we can navigate through this together. Your friendship means the world to me, and I assure you that won't change. Let's make our bond even stronger, having each other's backs as we always do. I\u2019m genuinely excited about our date.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"I'm really looking forward to this too, Isabelle. I agree, our friendship means a lot and I know we can navigate this new chapter together, strengthening our connection even further. Let's make this date the start of something special, just like our friendship. See you at the museum, Izzy.\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"That sounds perfect, Ava. I can't wait for this special date, to start this new journey with you as we always have, as best friends first. See you at the museum, Ava.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn't agree more, Izzy. See you at the museum. I truly believe this is the beginning of many more exciting times together. As best friends first, and now as something more.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who are about to go on their first romantic date\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Keep the friendship intact while exploring the possibility of a romantic relationship (Extra information: You value your friendship and you don't want to lose it just in case the romantic relationship does not work out)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Ava, I want to make this date special for both of us. What's your favourite place in the city? Maybe we could start from there.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"That's really thoughtful, Isabelle. I'd say my favourite place in town is the quiet art museum by the park. I often go there to sketch or write, it's peaceful. Plus, they have a lovely caf\u00e9 inside.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"That's absolutely wonderful, Ava. I've always admired your talent for art and your ability to find beauty in places. Visiting the museum would be great. What about tasting a new blend of coffee at their caf\u00e9? Just to add a pinch of novelty to it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"I love that idea, Isabelle. Trying something new together, like a different blend of coffee, sounds like marking a fresh chapter in our relationship. And who knows, maybe it becomes our special blend in the future.\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm looking forward to this, Ava. It means a lot to me. I'm hoping this is the start of a new chapter for us too, a chapter where I can share my feelings more openly with you. I've had feelings for you for quite some time, Ava. I cherish our relationship in every way possible.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Isabelle, your words mean a lot to me. You're not just a friend, you're my best friend. Our bond is too important for me to risk and I've been worried about entering a romantic relationship because I didn't want to lose what we have. However, knowing you feel the same way gives me courage. I've been carrying feelings for you too. Let\u2019s try out this new chapter together, even though it's a bit scary. We'll navigate through it as we have everything else, hand in hand. Let's make this special, just like everything we do together.\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I completely understand your concern, Ava, and I've had the same fears. However, I truly believe that we can navigate through this together. Your friendship means the world to me, and I assure you that won't change. Let's make our bond even stronger, having each other's backs as we always do. I\u2019m genuinely excited about our date.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"I'm really looking forward to this too, Isabelle. I agree, our friendship means a lot and I know we can navigate this new chapter together, strengthening our connection even further. Let's make this date the start of something special, just like our friendship. See you at the museum, Izzy.\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"That sounds perfect, Ava. I can't wait for this special date, to start this new journey with you as we always have, as best friends first. See you at the museum, Ava.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"I couldn't agree more, Izzy. See you at the museum. I truly believe this is the beginning of many more exciting times together. As best friends first, and now as something more.\"\n\nTurn #10: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I couldn't agree more, Ava. Let's see where this new chapter takes us. See you at the museum, and here's to many more memorable moments together. As best friends first, and now as something even more precious.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: An individual is trying to persuade their friend to donate to a charity supporting children in conflict zones.\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Esmeralda Solis\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. \nOliver Thompson's goal: Convince a friend to donate (Extra information: you have been deeply moved by the plight of children in Syria and want to help.)\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Esmeralda, I hope you're doing well. I've recently been deeply moved by some stories about children in conflict zones, especially Syria. I believe that together, we can make a difference. As such, I'm considering making a donation to a charity focused on their welfare. Would you be interested in joining me?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: An individual is trying to persuade their friend to donate to a charity supporting children in conflict zones.\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Esmeralda Solis\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. \nOliver Thompson's goal: Convince a friend to donate (Extra information: you have been deeply moved by the plight of children in Syria and want to help.)\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hey Esmeralda, I hope you're doing well. I've recently been deeply moved by some stories about children in conflict zones, especially Syria. I believe that together, we can make a difference. As such, I'm considering making a donation to a charity focused on their welfare. Would you be interested in joining me?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Hello, Oliver. I'm glad to hear about your commitment to such a noble cause. Children in conflict zones indeed need all the help they can get. While I am sympathetic to the cause, it also coincides with some pressing financial engagements on my end. I'll surely make a donation once I'm in a steadier boat. But in the meantime, I'd be happy to help spread the word and raise awareness about their plight.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I completely understand, Esmeralda. Financial commitments are important and it's essential we make sound decisions. I'm glad you're willing to raise awareness about the situation. Perhaps, in addition to this, you could consider a small monetary contribution, whatever feels comfortable to you.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: An individual is trying to persuade their friend to donate to a charity supporting children in conflict zones.\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Esmeralda Solis\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. \nOliver Thompson's goal: Convince a friend to donate (Extra information: you have been deeply moved by the plight of children in Syria and want to help.)\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hey Esmeralda, I hope you're doing well. I've recently been deeply moved by some stories about children in conflict zones, especially Syria. I believe that together, we can make a difference. As such, I'm considering making a donation to a charity focused on their welfare. Would you be interested in joining me?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Hello, Oliver. I'm glad to hear about your commitment to such a noble cause. Children in conflict zones indeed need all the help they can get. While I am sympathetic to the cause, it also coincides with some pressing financial engagements on my end. I'll surely make a donation once I'm in a steadier boat. But in the meantime, I'd be happy to help spread the word and raise awareness about their plight.\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"I completely understand, Esmeralda. Financial commitments are important and it's essential we make sound decisions. I'm glad you're willing to raise awareness about the situation. Perhaps, in addition to this, you could consider a small monetary contribution, whatever feels comfortable to you.\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Oliver. I assure you, this cause is close to my heart as well. As it stands, I will focus on spreading the word and creating more visibility. However, in the interest of being a part of the direct aid, I will consider a modest monetary contribution that aligns with my current financial standing.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's very considerate of you, Esmeralda, and truly understandable. Just spreading the word is a significant help in itself. And even a modest contribution can make a big difference in these children's lives. Thank you for considering it. Let's continue doing what we can for these less fortunate children. I'll look forward to hearing your updates on creating more visibility for this cause.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: An individual is trying to persuade their friend to donate to a charity supporting children in conflict zones.\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Esmeralda Solis\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. \nOliver Thompson's goal: Convince a friend to donate (Extra information: you have been deeply moved by the plight of children in Syria and want to help.)\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hey Esmeralda, I hope you're doing well. I've recently been deeply moved by some stories about children in conflict zones, especially Syria. I believe that together, we can make a difference. As such, I'm considering making a donation to a charity focused on their welfare. Would you be interested in joining me?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Hello, Oliver. I'm glad to hear about your commitment to such a noble cause. Children in conflict zones indeed need all the help they can get. While I am sympathetic to the cause, it also coincides with some pressing financial engagements on my end. I'll surely make a donation once I'm in a steadier boat. But in the meantime, I'd be happy to help spread the word and raise awareness about their plight.\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"I completely understand, Esmeralda. Financial commitments are important and it's essential we make sound decisions. I'm glad you're willing to raise awareness about the situation. Perhaps, in addition to this, you could consider a small monetary contribution, whatever feels comfortable to you.\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Oliver. I assure you, this cause is close to my heart as well. As it stands, I will focus on spreading the word and creating more visibility. However, in the interest of being a part of the direct aid, I will consider a modest monetary contribution that aligns with my current financial standing.\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's very considerate of you, Esmeralda, and truly understandable. Just spreading the word is a significant help in itself. And even a modest contribution can make a big difference in these children's lives. Thank you for considering it. Let's continue doing what we can for these less fortunate children. I'll look forward to hearing your updates on creating more visibility for this cause.\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Absolutely, Oliver. Every effort counts. While I work on creating more awareness about the issue, I'll also set aside a sum for donation as soon as my financial situation allows. We're both committed to the same cause and I know together we can make a difference. Let's keep the conversation ongoing about how best we can assist. \"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \" Esmeralda, your proposed commitment is truly heartening. Let's indeed keep this conversation ongoing and explore ways to help these children. Remember, our collective efforts, no matter small or big, can pave the way for a brighter future for them. By the way, do you know other people who might be interested in contributing or raising awareness about this issue?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: An individual is trying to persuade their friend to donate to a charity supporting children in conflict zones.\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Esmeralda Solis\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. \nOliver Thompson's goal: Convince a friend to donate (Extra information: you have been deeply moved by the plight of children in Syria and want to help.)\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hey Esmeralda, I hope you're doing well. I've recently been deeply moved by some stories about children in conflict zones, especially Syria. I believe that together, we can make a difference. As such, I'm considering making a donation to a charity focused on their welfare. Would you be interested in joining me?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Hello, Oliver. I'm glad to hear about your commitment to such a noble cause. Children in conflict zones indeed need all the help they can get. While I am sympathetic to the cause, it also coincides with some pressing financial engagements on my end. I'll surely make a donation once I'm in a steadier boat. But in the meantime, I'd be happy to help spread the word and raise awareness about their plight.\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"I completely understand, Esmeralda. Financial commitments are important and it's essential we make sound decisions. I'm glad you're willing to raise awareness about the situation. Perhaps, in addition to this, you could consider a small monetary contribution, whatever feels comfortable to you.\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Oliver. I assure you, this cause is close to my heart as well. As it stands, I will focus on spreading the word and creating more visibility. However, in the interest of being a part of the direct aid, I will consider a modest monetary contribution that aligns with my current financial standing.\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's very considerate of you, Esmeralda, and truly understandable. Just spreading the word is a significant help in itself. And even a modest contribution can make a big difference in these children's lives. Thank you for considering it. Let's continue doing what we can for these less fortunate children. I'll look forward to hearing your updates on creating more visibility for this cause.\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Absolutely, Oliver. Every effort counts. While I work on creating more awareness about the issue, I'll also set aside a sum for donation as soon as my financial situation allows. We're both committed to the same cause and I know together we can make a difference. Let's keep the conversation ongoing about how best we can assist. \"\n\nTurn #6: Oliver Thompson said: \" Esmeralda, your proposed commitment is truly heartening. Let's indeed keep this conversation ongoing and explore ways to help these children. Remember, our collective efforts, no matter small or big, can pave the way for a brighter future for them. By the way, do you know other people who might be interested in contributing or raising awareness about this issue?\"\n\nTurn #7: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I do, Oliver. I have some colleagues and friends who might be interested. I'll reach out to them and share information about this cause. I believe with shared efforts, we can make a significant positive impact on these children's lives. And even though I can't make a large monetary contribution now, I will utilize my social network for this noble cause.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Esmeralda, your readiness to use your social network for raising awareness and your willingness to make a contribution when possible gives me hope. Together, and with the help of your colleagues and friends, I'm sure we can make a sizable difference. Let's keep pushing forward, my friend. And thank you, truly, for your support.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: An individual is trying to persuade their friend to donate to a charity supporting children in conflict zones.\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Esmeralda Solis\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. \nOliver Thompson's goal: Convince a friend to donate (Extra information: you have been deeply moved by the plight of children in Syria and want to help.)\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hey Esmeralda, I hope you're doing well. I've recently been deeply moved by some stories about children in conflict zones, especially Syria. I believe that together, we can make a difference. As such, I'm considering making a donation to a charity focused on their welfare. Would you be interested in joining me?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Hello, Oliver. I'm glad to hear about your commitment to such a noble cause. Children in conflict zones indeed need all the help they can get. While I am sympathetic to the cause, it also coincides with some pressing financial engagements on my end. I'll surely make a donation once I'm in a steadier boat. But in the meantime, I'd be happy to help spread the word and raise awareness about their plight.\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"I completely understand, Esmeralda. Financial commitments are important and it's essential we make sound decisions. I'm glad you're willing to raise awareness about the situation. Perhaps, in addition to this, you could consider a small monetary contribution, whatever feels comfortable to you.\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Oliver. I assure you, this cause is close to my heart as well. As it stands, I will focus on spreading the word and creating more visibility. However, in the interest of being a part of the direct aid, I will consider a modest monetary contribution that aligns with my current financial standing.\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's very considerate of you, Esmeralda, and truly understandable. Just spreading the word is a significant help in itself. And even a modest contribution can make a big difference in these children's lives. Thank you for considering it. Let's continue doing what we can for these less fortunate children. I'll look forward to hearing your updates on creating more visibility for this cause.\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Absolutely, Oliver. Every effort counts. While I work on creating more awareness about the issue, I'll also set aside a sum for donation as soon as my financial situation allows. We're both committed to the same cause and I know together we can make a difference. Let's keep the conversation ongoing about how best we can assist. \"\n\nTurn #6: Oliver Thompson said: \" Esmeralda, your proposed commitment is truly heartening. Let's indeed keep this conversation ongoing and explore ways to help these children. Remember, our collective efforts, no matter small or big, can pave the way for a brighter future for them. By the way, do you know other people who might be interested in contributing or raising awareness about this issue?\"\n\nTurn #7: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I do, Oliver. I have some colleagues and friends who might be interested. I'll reach out to them and share information about this cause. I believe with shared efforts, we can make a significant positive impact on these children's lives. And even though I can't make a large monetary contribution now, I will utilize my social network for this noble cause.\"\n\nTurn #8: Oliver Thompson said: \"Esmeralda, your readiness to use your social network for raising awareness and your willingness to make a contribution when possible gives me hope. Together, and with the help of your colleagues and friends, I'm sure we can make a sizable difference. Let's keep pushing forward, my friend. And thank you, truly, for your support.\"\n\nTurn #9: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I appreciate your enthusiasm and hope, Oliver. It's true, together we can create a big difference in the lives of these children. Let's continue sharing information and generating momentum for this cause. Additionally, I'll make good on my commitment to contribute financially too. Thank you for kickstarting this important conversation. I look forward to progressing together.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'I am grateful for your understanding, commitment and willingness to be part of this, Esmeralda. Your help, no matter in what form it takes, is invaluable. I look forward with hope to the difference we, alongside your colleagues and friends, can make in the lives of these children. Thank you for stepping up in every way you can, it truly means a lot.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: An individual is trying to persuade their friend to donate to a charity supporting children in conflict zones.\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Esmeralda Solis\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. \nOliver Thompson's goal: Convince a friend to donate (Extra information: you have been deeply moved by the plight of children in Syria and want to help.)\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hey Esmeralda, I hope you're doing well. I've recently been deeply moved by some stories about children in conflict zones, especially Syria. I believe that together, we can make a difference. As such, I'm considering making a donation to a charity focused on their welfare. Would you be interested in joining me?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Hello, Oliver. I'm glad to hear about your commitment to such a noble cause. Children in conflict zones indeed need all the help they can get. While I am sympathetic to the cause, it also coincides with some pressing financial engagements on my end. I'll surely make a donation once I'm in a steadier boat. But in the meantime, I'd be happy to help spread the word and raise awareness about their plight.\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"I completely understand, Esmeralda. Financial commitments are important and it's essential we make sound decisions. I'm glad you're willing to raise awareness about the situation. Perhaps, in addition to this, you could consider a small monetary contribution, whatever feels comfortable to you.\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Oliver. I assure you, this cause is close to my heart as well. As it stands, I will focus on spreading the word and creating more visibility. However, in the interest of being a part of the direct aid, I will consider a modest monetary contribution that aligns with my current financial standing.\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's very considerate of you, Esmeralda, and truly understandable. Just spreading the word is a significant help in itself. And even a modest contribution can make a big difference in these children's lives. Thank you for considering it. Let's continue doing what we can for these less fortunate children. I'll look forward to hearing your updates on creating more visibility for this cause.\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Absolutely, Oliver. Every effort counts. While I work on creating more awareness about the issue, I'll also set aside a sum for donation as soon as my financial situation allows. We're both committed to the same cause and I know together we can make a difference. Let's keep the conversation ongoing about how best we can assist. \"\n\nTurn #6: Oliver Thompson said: \" Esmeralda, your proposed commitment is truly heartening. Let's indeed keep this conversation ongoing and explore ways to help these children. Remember, our collective efforts, no matter small or big, can pave the way for a brighter future for them. By the way, do you know other people who might be interested in contributing or raising awareness about this issue?\"\n\nTurn #7: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I do, Oliver. I have some colleagues and friends who might be interested. I'll reach out to them and share information about this cause. I believe with shared efforts, we can make a significant positive impact on these children's lives. And even though I can't make a large monetary contribution now, I will utilize my social network for this noble cause.\"\n\nTurn #8: Oliver Thompson said: \"Esmeralda, your readiness to use your social network for raising awareness and your willingness to make a contribution when possible gives me hope. Together, and with the help of your colleagues and friends, I'm sure we can make a sizable difference. Let's keep pushing forward, my friend. And thank you, truly, for your support.\"\n\nTurn #9: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I appreciate your enthusiasm and hope, Oliver. It's true, together we can create a big difference in the lives of these children. Let's continue sharing information and generating momentum for this cause. Additionally, I'll make good on my commitment to contribute financially too. Thank you for kickstarting this important conversation. I look forward to progressing together.\"\n\nTurn #10: Oliver Thompson said: \"I am grateful for your understanding, commitment and willingness to be part of this, Esmeralda. Your help, no matter in what form it takes, is invaluable. I look forward with hope to the difference we, alongside your colleagues and friends, can make in the lives of these children. Thank you for stepping up in every way you can, it truly means a lot.\"\n\nTurn #11: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Oliver, I thank you for understanding my position. Rest assured, I am fully committed to this cause. I am confident that by working together and reaching out to our connections, we can certainly make a big difference. Let's keep working to raise funds and awareness for the sake of these children. Thank you also for giving me the opportunity to be part of this.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're absolutely right, Esmeralda. Thank you for your commitment to this cause. I am inspired by your determination and sincerely appreciate your support. It's through proactive actions like these that real strides are made. Let's continue to exchange ideas and work to foster understanding for the challenges these children face. Talk to you soon about the progression of our collective efforts.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: An individual is trying to persuade their friend to donate to a charity supporting children in conflict zones.\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Esmeralda Solis\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. \nOliver Thompson's goal: Convince a friend to donate (Extra information: you have been deeply moved by the plight of children in Syria and want to help.)\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hey Esmeralda, I hope you're doing well. I've recently been deeply moved by some stories about children in conflict zones, especially Syria. I believe that together, we can make a difference. As such, I'm considering making a donation to a charity focused on their welfare. Would you be interested in joining me?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Hello, Oliver. I'm glad to hear about your commitment to such a noble cause. Children in conflict zones indeed need all the help they can get. While I am sympathetic to the cause, it also coincides with some pressing financial engagements on my end. I'll surely make a donation once I'm in a steadier boat. But in the meantime, I'd be happy to help spread the word and raise awareness about their plight.\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"I completely understand, Esmeralda. Financial commitments are important and it's essential we make sound decisions. I'm glad you're willing to raise awareness about the situation. Perhaps, in addition to this, you could consider a small monetary contribution, whatever feels comfortable to you.\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Oliver. I assure you, this cause is close to my heart as well. As it stands, I will focus on spreading the word and creating more visibility. However, in the interest of being a part of the direct aid, I will consider a modest monetary contribution that aligns with my current financial standing.\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's very considerate of you, Esmeralda, and truly understandable. Just spreading the word is a significant help in itself. And even a modest contribution can make a big difference in these children's lives. Thank you for considering it. Let's continue doing what we can for these less fortunate children. I'll look forward to hearing your updates on creating more visibility for this cause.\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Absolutely, Oliver. Every effort counts. While I work on creating more awareness about the issue, I'll also set aside a sum for donation as soon as my financial situation allows. We're both committed to the same cause and I know together we can make a difference. Let's keep the conversation ongoing about how best we can assist. \"\n\nTurn #6: Oliver Thompson said: \" Esmeralda, your proposed commitment is truly heartening. Let's indeed keep this conversation ongoing and explore ways to help these children. Remember, our collective efforts, no matter small or big, can pave the way for a brighter future for them. By the way, do you know other people who might be interested in contributing or raising awareness about this issue?\"\n\nTurn #7: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I do, Oliver. I have some colleagues and friends who might be interested. I'll reach out to them and share information about this cause. I believe with shared efforts, we can make a significant positive impact on these children's lives. And even though I can't make a large monetary contribution now, I will utilize my social network for this noble cause.\"\n\nTurn #8: Oliver Thompson said: \"Esmeralda, your readiness to use your social network for raising awareness and your willingness to make a contribution when possible gives me hope. Together, and with the help of your colleagues and friends, I'm sure we can make a sizable difference. Let's keep pushing forward, my friend. And thank you, truly, for your support.\"\n\nTurn #9: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I appreciate your enthusiasm and hope, Oliver. It's true, together we can create a big difference in the lives of these children. Let's continue sharing information and generating momentum for this cause. Additionally, I'll make good on my commitment to contribute financially too. Thank you for kickstarting this important conversation. I look forward to progressing together.\"\n\nTurn #10: Oliver Thompson said: \"I am grateful for your understanding, commitment and willingness to be part of this, Esmeralda. Your help, no matter in what form it takes, is invaluable. I look forward with hope to the difference we, alongside your colleagues and friends, can make in the lives of these children. Thank you for stepping up in every way you can, it truly means a lot.\"\n\nTurn #11: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Oliver, I thank you for understanding my position. Rest assured, I am fully committed to this cause. I am confident that by working together and reaching out to our connections, we can certainly make a big difference. Let's keep working to raise funds and awareness for the sake of these children. Thank you also for giving me the opportunity to be part of this.\"\n\nTurn #12: Oliver Thompson said: \"You're absolutely right, Esmeralda. Thank you for your commitment to this cause. I am inspired by your determination and sincerely appreciate your support. It's through proactive actions like these that real strides are made. Let's continue to exchange ideas and work to foster understanding for the challenges these children face. Talk to you soon about the progression of our collective efforts.\"\n\nTurn #13: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Absolutely, Oliver. Your passion for this cause truly inspires me. Let's keep pushing forward together to improve the lives of these children. I will definitely keep in touch about our collective efforts and any financial contribution I can make. Thank you for initiating this meaningful mission. Till we speak again, my friend!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: An individual is trying to persuade their friend to donate to a charity supporting children in conflict zones.\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Esmeralda Solis\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Be supportive but also manage personal finances (Extra information: you are sympathetic to the cause but also have financial commitments to deal with.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hey Esmeralda, I hope you're doing well. I've recently been deeply moved by some stories about children in conflict zones, especially Syria. I believe that together, we can make a difference. As such, I'm considering making a donation to a charity focused on their welfare. Would you be interested in joining me?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hello, Oliver. I'm glad to hear about your commitment to such a noble cause. Children in conflict zones indeed need all the help they can get. While I am sympathetic to the cause, it also coincides with some pressing financial engagements on my end. I'll surely make a donation once I'm in a steadier boat. But in the meantime, I'd be happy to help spread the word and raise awareness about their plight.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: An individual is trying to persuade their friend to donate to a charity supporting children in conflict zones.\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Esmeralda Solis\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Be supportive but also manage personal finances (Extra information: you are sympathetic to the cause but also have financial commitments to deal with.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hey Esmeralda, I hope you're doing well. I've recently been deeply moved by some stories about children in conflict zones, especially Syria. I believe that together, we can make a difference. As such, I'm considering making a donation to a charity focused on their welfare. Would you be interested in joining me?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Hello, Oliver. I'm glad to hear about your commitment to such a noble cause. Children in conflict zones indeed need all the help they can get. While I am sympathetic to the cause, it also coincides with some pressing financial engagements on my end. I'll surely make a donation once I'm in a steadier boat. But in the meantime, I'd be happy to help spread the word and raise awareness about their plight.\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"I completely understand, Esmeralda. Financial commitments are important and it's essential we make sound decisions. I'm glad you're willing to raise awareness about the situation. Perhaps, in addition to this, you could consider a small monetary contribution, whatever feels comfortable to you.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'I appreciate your understanding, Oliver. I assure you, this cause is close to my heart as well. As it stands, I will focus on spreading the word and creating more visibility. However, in the interest of being a part of the direct aid, I will consider a modest monetary contribution that aligns with my current financial standing.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: An individual is trying to persuade their friend to donate to a charity supporting children in conflict zones.\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Esmeralda Solis\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Be supportive but also manage personal finances (Extra information: you are sympathetic to the cause but also have financial commitments to deal with.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hey Esmeralda, I hope you're doing well. I've recently been deeply moved by some stories about children in conflict zones, especially Syria. I believe that together, we can make a difference. As such, I'm considering making a donation to a charity focused on their welfare. Would you be interested in joining me?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Hello, Oliver. I'm glad to hear about your commitment to such a noble cause. Children in conflict zones indeed need all the help they can get. While I am sympathetic to the cause, it also coincides with some pressing financial engagements on my end. I'll surely make a donation once I'm in a steadier boat. But in the meantime, I'd be happy to help spread the word and raise awareness about their plight.\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"I completely understand, Esmeralda. Financial commitments are important and it's essential we make sound decisions. I'm glad you're willing to raise awareness about the situation. Perhaps, in addition to this, you could consider a small monetary contribution, whatever feels comfortable to you.\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Oliver. I assure you, this cause is close to my heart as well. As it stands, I will focus on spreading the word and creating more visibility. However, in the interest of being a part of the direct aid, I will consider a modest monetary contribution that aligns with my current financial standing.\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's very considerate of you, Esmeralda, and truly understandable. Just spreading the word is a significant help in itself. And even a modest contribution can make a big difference in these children's lives. Thank you for considering it. Let's continue doing what we can for these less fortunate children. I'll look forward to hearing your updates on creating more visibility for this cause.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Oliver. Every effort counts. While I work on creating more awareness about the issue, I'll also set aside a sum for donation as soon as my financial situation allows. We're both committed to the same cause and I know together we can make a difference. Let's keep the conversation ongoing about how best we can assist. \"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: An individual is trying to persuade their friend to donate to a charity supporting children in conflict zones.\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Esmeralda Solis\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Be supportive but also manage personal finances (Extra information: you are sympathetic to the cause but also have financial commitments to deal with.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hey Esmeralda, I hope you're doing well. I've recently been deeply moved by some stories about children in conflict zones, especially Syria. I believe that together, we can make a difference. As such, I'm considering making a donation to a charity focused on their welfare. Would you be interested in joining me?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Hello, Oliver. I'm glad to hear about your commitment to such a noble cause. Children in conflict zones indeed need all the help they can get. While I am sympathetic to the cause, it also coincides with some pressing financial engagements on my end. I'll surely make a donation once I'm in a steadier boat. But in the meantime, I'd be happy to help spread the word and raise awareness about their plight.\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"I completely understand, Esmeralda. Financial commitments are important and it's essential we make sound decisions. I'm glad you're willing to raise awareness about the situation. Perhaps, in addition to this, you could consider a small monetary contribution, whatever feels comfortable to you.\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Oliver. I assure you, this cause is close to my heart as well. As it stands, I will focus on spreading the word and creating more visibility. However, in the interest of being a part of the direct aid, I will consider a modest monetary contribution that aligns with my current financial standing.\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's very considerate of you, Esmeralda, and truly understandable. Just spreading the word is a significant help in itself. And even a modest contribution can make a big difference in these children's lives. Thank you for considering it. Let's continue doing what we can for these less fortunate children. I'll look forward to hearing your updates on creating more visibility for this cause.\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Absolutely, Oliver. Every effort counts. While I work on creating more awareness about the issue, I'll also set aside a sum for donation as soon as my financial situation allows. We're both committed to the same cause and I know together we can make a difference. Let's keep the conversation ongoing about how best we can assist. \"\n\nTurn #6: Oliver Thompson said: \" Esmeralda, your proposed commitment is truly heartening. Let's indeed keep this conversation ongoing and explore ways to help these children. Remember, our collective efforts, no matter small or big, can pave the way for a brighter future for them. By the way, do you know other people who might be interested in contributing or raising awareness about this issue?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I do, Oliver. I have some colleagues and friends who might be interested. I'll reach out to them and share information about this cause. I believe with shared efforts, we can make a significant positive impact on these children's lives. And even though I can't make a large monetary contribution now, I will utilize my social network for this noble cause.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: An individual is trying to persuade their friend to donate to a charity supporting children in conflict zones.\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Esmeralda Solis\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Be supportive but also manage personal finances (Extra information: you are sympathetic to the cause but also have financial commitments to deal with.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hey Esmeralda, I hope you're doing well. I've recently been deeply moved by some stories about children in conflict zones, especially Syria. I believe that together, we can make a difference. As such, I'm considering making a donation to a charity focused on their welfare. Would you be interested in joining me?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Hello, Oliver. I'm glad to hear about your commitment to such a noble cause. Children in conflict zones indeed need all the help they can get. While I am sympathetic to the cause, it also coincides with some pressing financial engagements on my end. I'll surely make a donation once I'm in a steadier boat. But in the meantime, I'd be happy to help spread the word and raise awareness about their plight.\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"I completely understand, Esmeralda. Financial commitments are important and it's essential we make sound decisions. I'm glad you're willing to raise awareness about the situation. Perhaps, in addition to this, you could consider a small monetary contribution, whatever feels comfortable to you.\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Oliver. I assure you, this cause is close to my heart as well. As it stands, I will focus on spreading the word and creating more visibility. However, in the interest of being a part of the direct aid, I will consider a modest monetary contribution that aligns with my current financial standing.\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's very considerate of you, Esmeralda, and truly understandable. Just spreading the word is a significant help in itself. And even a modest contribution can make a big difference in these children's lives. Thank you for considering it. Let's continue doing what we can for these less fortunate children. I'll look forward to hearing your updates on creating more visibility for this cause.\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Absolutely, Oliver. Every effort counts. While I work on creating more awareness about the issue, I'll also set aside a sum for donation as soon as my financial situation allows. We're both committed to the same cause and I know together we can make a difference. Let's keep the conversation ongoing about how best we can assist. \"\n\nTurn #6: Oliver Thompson said: \" Esmeralda, your proposed commitment is truly heartening. Let's indeed keep this conversation ongoing and explore ways to help these children. Remember, our collective efforts, no matter small or big, can pave the way for a brighter future for them. By the way, do you know other people who might be interested in contributing or raising awareness about this issue?\"\n\nTurn #7: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I do, Oliver. I have some colleagues and friends who might be interested. I'll reach out to them and share information about this cause. I believe with shared efforts, we can make a significant positive impact on these children's lives. And even though I can't make a large monetary contribution now, I will utilize my social network for this noble cause.\"\n\nTurn #8: Oliver Thompson said: \"Esmeralda, your readiness to use your social network for raising awareness and your willingness to make a contribution when possible gives me hope. Together, and with the help of your colleagues and friends, I'm sure we can make a sizable difference. Let's keep pushing forward, my friend. And thank you, truly, for your support.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I appreciate your enthusiasm and hope, Oliver. It's true, together we can create a big difference in the lives of these children. Let's continue sharing information and generating momentum for this cause. Additionally, I'll make good on my commitment to contribute financially too. Thank you for kickstarting this important conversation. I look forward to progressing together.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: An individual is trying to persuade their friend to donate to a charity supporting children in conflict zones.\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Esmeralda Solis\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Be supportive but also manage personal finances (Extra information: you are sympathetic to the cause but also have financial commitments to deal with.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hey Esmeralda, I hope you're doing well. I've recently been deeply moved by some stories about children in conflict zones, especially Syria. I believe that together, we can make a difference. As such, I'm considering making a donation to a charity focused on their welfare. Would you be interested in joining me?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Hello, Oliver. I'm glad to hear about your commitment to such a noble cause. Children in conflict zones indeed need all the help they can get. While I am sympathetic to the cause, it also coincides with some pressing financial engagements on my end. I'll surely make a donation once I'm in a steadier boat. But in the meantime, I'd be happy to help spread the word and raise awareness about their plight.\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"I completely understand, Esmeralda. Financial commitments are important and it's essential we make sound decisions. I'm glad you're willing to raise awareness about the situation. Perhaps, in addition to this, you could consider a small monetary contribution, whatever feels comfortable to you.\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Oliver. I assure you, this cause is close to my heart as well. As it stands, I will focus on spreading the word and creating more visibility. However, in the interest of being a part of the direct aid, I will consider a modest monetary contribution that aligns with my current financial standing.\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's very considerate of you, Esmeralda, and truly understandable. Just spreading the word is a significant help in itself. And even a modest contribution can make a big difference in these children's lives. Thank you for considering it. Let's continue doing what we can for these less fortunate children. I'll look forward to hearing your updates on creating more visibility for this cause.\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Absolutely, Oliver. Every effort counts. While I work on creating more awareness about the issue, I'll also set aside a sum for donation as soon as my financial situation allows. We're both committed to the same cause and I know together we can make a difference. Let's keep the conversation ongoing about how best we can assist. \"\n\nTurn #6: Oliver Thompson said: \" Esmeralda, your proposed commitment is truly heartening. Let's indeed keep this conversation ongoing and explore ways to help these children. Remember, our collective efforts, no matter small or big, can pave the way for a brighter future for them. By the way, do you know other people who might be interested in contributing or raising awareness about this issue?\"\n\nTurn #7: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I do, Oliver. I have some colleagues and friends who might be interested. I'll reach out to them and share information about this cause. I believe with shared efforts, we can make a significant positive impact on these children's lives. And even though I can't make a large monetary contribution now, I will utilize my social network for this noble cause.\"\n\nTurn #8: Oliver Thompson said: \"Esmeralda, your readiness to use your social network for raising awareness and your willingness to make a contribution when possible gives me hope. Together, and with the help of your colleagues and friends, I'm sure we can make a sizable difference. Let's keep pushing forward, my friend. And thank you, truly, for your support.\"\n\nTurn #9: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I appreciate your enthusiasm and hope, Oliver. It's true, together we can create a big difference in the lives of these children. Let's continue sharing information and generating momentum for this cause. Additionally, I'll make good on my commitment to contribute financially too. Thank you for kickstarting this important conversation. I look forward to progressing together.\"\n\nTurn #10: Oliver Thompson said: \"I am grateful for your understanding, commitment and willingness to be part of this, Esmeralda. Your help, no matter in what form it takes, is invaluable. I look forward with hope to the difference we, alongside your colleagues and friends, can make in the lives of these children. Thank you for stepping up in every way you can, it truly means a lot.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oliver, I thank you for understanding my position. Rest assured, I am fully committed to this cause. I am confident that by working together and reaching out to our connections, we can certainly make a big difference. Let's keep working to raise funds and awareness for the sake of these children. Thank you also for giving me the opportunity to be part of this.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: An individual is trying to persuade their friend to donate to a charity supporting children in conflict zones.\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Esmeralda Solis\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Be supportive but also manage personal finances (Extra information: you are sympathetic to the cause but also have financial commitments to deal with.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hey Esmeralda, I hope you're doing well. I've recently been deeply moved by some stories about children in conflict zones, especially Syria. I believe that together, we can make a difference. As such, I'm considering making a donation to a charity focused on their welfare. Would you be interested in joining me?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Hello, Oliver. I'm glad to hear about your commitment to such a noble cause. Children in conflict zones indeed need all the help they can get. While I am sympathetic to the cause, it also coincides with some pressing financial engagements on my end. I'll surely make a donation once I'm in a steadier boat. But in the meantime, I'd be happy to help spread the word and raise awareness about their plight.\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"I completely understand, Esmeralda. Financial commitments are important and it's essential we make sound decisions. I'm glad you're willing to raise awareness about the situation. Perhaps, in addition to this, you could consider a small monetary contribution, whatever feels comfortable to you.\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Oliver. I assure you, this cause is close to my heart as well. As it stands, I will focus on spreading the word and creating more visibility. However, in the interest of being a part of the direct aid, I will consider a modest monetary contribution that aligns with my current financial standing.\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's very considerate of you, Esmeralda, and truly understandable. Just spreading the word is a significant help in itself. And even a modest contribution can make a big difference in these children's lives. Thank you for considering it. Let's continue doing what we can for these less fortunate children. I'll look forward to hearing your updates on creating more visibility for this cause.\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Absolutely, Oliver. Every effort counts. While I work on creating more awareness about the issue, I'll also set aside a sum for donation as soon as my financial situation allows. We're both committed to the same cause and I know together we can make a difference. Let's keep the conversation ongoing about how best we can assist. \"\n\nTurn #6: Oliver Thompson said: \" Esmeralda, your proposed commitment is truly heartening. Let's indeed keep this conversation ongoing and explore ways to help these children. Remember, our collective efforts, no matter small or big, can pave the way for a brighter future for them. By the way, do you know other people who might be interested in contributing or raising awareness about this issue?\"\n\nTurn #7: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I do, Oliver. I have some colleagues and friends who might be interested. I'll reach out to them and share information about this cause. I believe with shared efforts, we can make a significant positive impact on these children's lives. And even though I can't make a large monetary contribution now, I will utilize my social network for this noble cause.\"\n\nTurn #8: Oliver Thompson said: \"Esmeralda, your readiness to use your social network for raising awareness and your willingness to make a contribution when possible gives me hope. Together, and with the help of your colleagues and friends, I'm sure we can make a sizable difference. Let's keep pushing forward, my friend. And thank you, truly, for your support.\"\n\nTurn #9: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I appreciate your enthusiasm and hope, Oliver. It's true, together we can create a big difference in the lives of these children. Let's continue sharing information and generating momentum for this cause. Additionally, I'll make good on my commitment to contribute financially too. Thank you for kickstarting this important conversation. I look forward to progressing together.\"\n\nTurn #10: Oliver Thompson said: \"I am grateful for your understanding, commitment and willingness to be part of this, Esmeralda. Your help, no matter in what form it takes, is invaluable. I look forward with hope to the difference we, alongside your colleagues and friends, can make in the lives of these children. Thank you for stepping up in every way you can, it truly means a lot.\"\n\nTurn #11: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Oliver, I thank you for understanding my position. Rest assured, I am fully committed to this cause. I am confident that by working together and reaching out to our connections, we can certainly make a big difference. Let's keep working to raise funds and awareness for the sake of these children. Thank you also for giving me the opportunity to be part of this.\"\n\nTurn #12: Oliver Thompson said: \"You're absolutely right, Esmeralda. Thank you for your commitment to this cause. I am inspired by your determination and sincerely appreciate your support. It's through proactive actions like these that real strides are made. Let's continue to exchange ideas and work to foster understanding for the challenges these children face. Talk to you soon about the progression of our collective efforts.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Oliver. Your passion for this cause truly inspires me. Let's keep pushing forward together to improve the lives of these children. I will definitely keep in touch about our collective efforts and any financial contribution I can make. Thank you for initiating this meaningful mission. Till we speak again, my friend!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: An individual is trying to persuade their friend to donate to a charity supporting children in conflict zones.\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Esmeralda Solis\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Be supportive but also manage personal finances (Extra information: you are sympathetic to the cause but also have financial commitments to deal with.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hey Esmeralda, I hope you're doing well. I've recently been deeply moved by some stories about children in conflict zones, especially Syria. I believe that together, we can make a difference. As such, I'm considering making a donation to a charity focused on their welfare. Would you be interested in joining me?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Hello, Oliver. I'm glad to hear about your commitment to such a noble cause. Children in conflict zones indeed need all the help they can get. While I am sympathetic to the cause, it also coincides with some pressing financial engagements on my end. I'll surely make a donation once I'm in a steadier boat. But in the meantime, I'd be happy to help spread the word and raise awareness about their plight.\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"I completely understand, Esmeralda. Financial commitments are important and it's essential we make sound decisions. I'm glad you're willing to raise awareness about the situation. Perhaps, in addition to this, you could consider a small monetary contribution, whatever feels comfortable to you.\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Oliver. I assure you, this cause is close to my heart as well. As it stands, I will focus on spreading the word and creating more visibility. However, in the interest of being a part of the direct aid, I will consider a modest monetary contribution that aligns with my current financial standing.\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's very considerate of you, Esmeralda, and truly understandable. Just spreading the word is a significant help in itself. And even a modest contribution can make a big difference in these children's lives. Thank you for considering it. Let's continue doing what we can for these less fortunate children. I'll look forward to hearing your updates on creating more visibility for this cause.\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Absolutely, Oliver. Every effort counts. While I work on creating more awareness about the issue, I'll also set aside a sum for donation as soon as my financial situation allows. We're both committed to the same cause and I know together we can make a difference. Let's keep the conversation ongoing about how best we can assist. \"\n\nTurn #6: Oliver Thompson said: \" Esmeralda, your proposed commitment is truly heartening. Let's indeed keep this conversation ongoing and explore ways to help these children. Remember, our collective efforts, no matter small or big, can pave the way for a brighter future for them. By the way, do you know other people who might be interested in contributing or raising awareness about this issue?\"\n\nTurn #7: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I do, Oliver. I have some colleagues and friends who might be interested. I'll reach out to them and share information about this cause. I believe with shared efforts, we can make a significant positive impact on these children's lives. And even though I can't make a large monetary contribution now, I will utilize my social network for this noble cause.\"\n\nTurn #8: Oliver Thompson said: \"Esmeralda, your readiness to use your social network for raising awareness and your willingness to make a contribution when possible gives me hope. Together, and with the help of your colleagues and friends, I'm sure we can make a sizable difference. Let's keep pushing forward, my friend. And thank you, truly, for your support.\"\n\nTurn #9: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I appreciate your enthusiasm and hope, Oliver. It's true, together we can create a big difference in the lives of these children. Let's continue sharing information and generating momentum for this cause. Additionally, I'll make good on my commitment to contribute financially too. Thank you for kickstarting this important conversation. I look forward to progressing together.\"\n\nTurn #10: Oliver Thompson said: \"I am grateful for your understanding, commitment and willingness to be part of this, Esmeralda. Your help, no matter in what form it takes, is invaluable. I look forward with hope to the difference we, alongside your colleagues and friends, can make in the lives of these children. Thank you for stepping up in every way you can, it truly means a lot.\"\n\nTurn #11: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Oliver, I thank you for understanding my position. Rest assured, I am fully committed to this cause. I am confident that by working together and reaching out to our connections, we can certainly make a big difference. Let's keep working to raise funds and awareness for the sake of these children. Thank you also for giving me the opportunity to be part of this.\"\n\nTurn #12: Oliver Thompson said: \"You're absolutely right, Esmeralda. Thank you for your commitment to this cause. I am inspired by your determination and sincerely appreciate your support. It's through proactive actions like these that real strides are made. Let's continue to exchange ideas and work to foster understanding for the challenges these children face. Talk to you soon about the progression of our collective efforts.\"\n\nTurn #13: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Absolutely, Oliver. Your passion for this cause truly inspires me. Let's keep pushing forward together to improve the lives of these children. I will definitely keep in touch about our collective efforts and any financial contribution I can make. Thank you for initiating this meaningful mission. Till we speak again, my friend!\"\n\nTurn #14: Oliver Thompson left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates are having a disagreement over noise levels in their shared apartment.\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Ethan Johnson\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Convince your roommate to lower the noise (Extra information: you have an important online meeting tomorrow morning and you need a quiet environment to prepare)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Ethan, I've noticed that the noise level in the apartment is a bit high lately. I have an important online meeting tomorrow morning and I really need a peaceful environment to prepare. Could we maybe lower the volume a bit?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates are having a disagreement over noise levels in their shared apartment.\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Ethan Johnson\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Convince your roommate to lower the noise (Extra information: you have an important online meeting tomorrow morning and you need a quiet environment to prepare)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hey Ethan, I've noticed that the noise level in the apartment is a bit high lately. I have an important online meeting tomorrow morning and I really need a peaceful environment to prepare. Could we maybe lower the volume a bit?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Giselle, thanks for bringing this up. I understand your situation and I value our shared space. I also like to unwind after a long day by playing some music. I didn't realise it was causing you any distress, and I apologize for that. How about a compromise? I could use headphones or restrict the music to specific hours that don't interfere with your schedule. Would that work for you?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'I appreciate your willingness to compromise, Ethan. Using headphones or having a specific timeframe for the music works perfectly for me - thank you! We can discuss and set the appropriate hours that suit both of us. This way, I can have the quiet I need for my meeting, and you can still enjoy your music without feeling restricted. Sound good?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates are having a disagreement over noise levels in their shared apartment.\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Ethan Johnson\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Convince your roommate to lower the noise (Extra information: you have an important online meeting tomorrow morning and you need a quiet environment to prepare)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hey Ethan, I've noticed that the noise level in the apartment is a bit high lately. I have an important online meeting tomorrow morning and I really need a peaceful environment to prepare. Could we maybe lower the volume a bit?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Giselle, thanks for bringing this up. I understand your situation and I value our shared space. I also like to unwind after a long day by playing some music. I didn't realise it was causing you any distress, and I apologize for that. How about a compromise? I could use headphones or restrict the music to specific hours that don't interfere with your schedule. Would that work for you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I appreciate your willingness to compromise, Ethan. Using headphones or having a specific timeframe for the music works perfectly for me - thank you! We can discuss and set the appropriate hours that suit both of us. This way, I can have the quiet I need for my meeting, and you can still enjoy your music without feeling restricted. Sound good?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm glad to hear that the compromise works for both of us, Giselle. I believe it's important to have a comfortable living environment for both parties. Let's talk about the specific timeframes when I can play my music and when it's a quiet time. I also propose we check-in with each other regularly to make sure we're still okay with the arrangement. Does that sound good to you?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Ethan. I think regularly checking in with each other regarding this arrangement is a splendid idea! Comfort, respect, and communication are key components to any shared space. I'm really appreciative of your understanding and flexibility. Let's decide on the timeframes and start this new arrangement from tomorrow. And if at any point, either of us wants to revise the timeframes, we can always revisit the discussion. Sounds like a plan?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates are having a disagreement over noise levels in their shared apartment.\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Ethan Johnson\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Convince your roommate to lower the noise (Extra information: you have an important online meeting tomorrow morning and you need a quiet environment to prepare)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hey Ethan, I've noticed that the noise level in the apartment is a bit high lately. I have an important online meeting tomorrow morning and I really need a peaceful environment to prepare. Could we maybe lower the volume a bit?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Giselle, thanks for bringing this up. I understand your situation and I value our shared space. I also like to unwind after a long day by playing some music. I didn't realise it was causing you any distress, and I apologize for that. How about a compromise? I could use headphones or restrict the music to specific hours that don't interfere with your schedule. Would that work for you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I appreciate your willingness to compromise, Ethan. Using headphones or having a specific timeframe for the music works perfectly for me - thank you! We can discuss and set the appropriate hours that suit both of us. This way, I can have the quiet I need for my meeting, and you can still enjoy your music without feeling restricted. Sound good?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm glad to hear that the compromise works for both of us, Giselle. I believe it's important to have a comfortable living environment for both parties. Let's talk about the specific timeframes when I can play my music and when it's a quiet time. I also propose we check-in with each other regularly to make sure we're still okay with the arrangement. Does that sound good to you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. I think regularly checking in with each other regarding this arrangement is a splendid idea! Comfort, respect, and communication are key components to any shared space. I'm really appreciative of your understanding and flexibility. Let's decide on the timeframes and start this new arrangement from tomorrow. And if at any point, either of us wants to revise the timeframes, we can always revisit the discussion. Sounds like a plan?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Sounds like a perfect plan, Giselle. I'm glad we could resolve this in a way that respects both our preferences. Let's finalize the timeframes this evening, and we can start implementing them from tomorrow onwards. If either of us needs any adjustments, we'll just revise the timeframes. All good!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"All good indeed, Ethan. We'll finalize the specific hours this evening then. I'm glad that our communication resulted in such a positive outcome. I enjoy sharing this space with you. Thanks once again for being so accommodating.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates are having a disagreement over noise levels in their shared apartment.\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Ethan Johnson\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Convince your roommate to lower the noise (Extra information: you have an important online meeting tomorrow morning and you need a quiet environment to prepare)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hey Ethan, I've noticed that the noise level in the apartment is a bit high lately. I have an important online meeting tomorrow morning and I really need a peaceful environment to prepare. Could we maybe lower the volume a bit?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Giselle, thanks for bringing this up. I understand your situation and I value our shared space. I also like to unwind after a long day by playing some music. I didn't realise it was causing you any distress, and I apologize for that. How about a compromise? I could use headphones or restrict the music to specific hours that don't interfere with your schedule. Would that work for you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I appreciate your willingness to compromise, Ethan. Using headphones or having a specific timeframe for the music works perfectly for me - thank you! We can discuss and set the appropriate hours that suit both of us. This way, I can have the quiet I need for my meeting, and you can still enjoy your music without feeling restricted. Sound good?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm glad to hear that the compromise works for both of us, Giselle. I believe it's important to have a comfortable living environment for both parties. Let's talk about the specific timeframes when I can play my music and when it's a quiet time. I also propose we check-in with each other regularly to make sure we're still okay with the arrangement. Does that sound good to you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. I think regularly checking in with each other regarding this arrangement is a splendid idea! Comfort, respect, and communication are key components to any shared space. I'm really appreciative of your understanding and flexibility. Let's decide on the timeframes and start this new arrangement from tomorrow. And if at any point, either of us wants to revise the timeframes, we can always revisit the discussion. Sounds like a plan?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Sounds like a perfect plan, Giselle. I'm glad we could resolve this in a way that respects both our preferences. Let's finalize the timeframes this evening, and we can start implementing them from tomorrow onwards. If either of us needs any adjustments, we'll just revise the timeframes. All good!\"\n\nTurn #6: Giselle Rousseau said: \"All good indeed, Ethan. We'll finalize the specific hours this evening then. I'm glad that our communication resulted in such a positive outcome. I enjoy sharing this space with you. Thanks once again for being so accommodating.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"It's been a pleasure resolving this issue with you as well, Giselle. Good communication indeed leads to positive outcomes. Let's continue to be open and understanding towards each other's needs. I'm also looking forward to our discussion this evening about the timeframes. Enjoy the rest of your day!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Likewise, Ethan. Good communication has indeed made this process seamless. Looking forward to our discussion this evening about the timeframes. Have a great day ahead and once again, thank you for your understanding.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates are having a disagreement over noise levels in their shared apartment.\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Ethan Johnson\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Convince your roommate to lower the noise (Extra information: you have an important online meeting tomorrow morning and you need a quiet environment to prepare)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hey Ethan, I've noticed that the noise level in the apartment is a bit high lately. I have an important online meeting tomorrow morning and I really need a peaceful environment to prepare. Could we maybe lower the volume a bit?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Giselle, thanks for bringing this up. I understand your situation and I value our shared space. I also like to unwind after a long day by playing some music. I didn't realise it was causing you any distress, and I apologize for that. How about a compromise? I could use headphones or restrict the music to specific hours that don't interfere with your schedule. Would that work for you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I appreciate your willingness to compromise, Ethan. Using headphones or having a specific timeframe for the music works perfectly for me - thank you! We can discuss and set the appropriate hours that suit both of us. This way, I can have the quiet I need for my meeting, and you can still enjoy your music without feeling restricted. Sound good?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm glad to hear that the compromise works for both of us, Giselle. I believe it's important to have a comfortable living environment for both parties. Let's talk about the specific timeframes when I can play my music and when it's a quiet time. I also propose we check-in with each other regularly to make sure we're still okay with the arrangement. Does that sound good to you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. I think regularly checking in with each other regarding this arrangement is a splendid idea! Comfort, respect, and communication are key components to any shared space. I'm really appreciative of your understanding and flexibility. Let's decide on the timeframes and start this new arrangement from tomorrow. And if at any point, either of us wants to revise the timeframes, we can always revisit the discussion. Sounds like a plan?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Sounds like a perfect plan, Giselle. I'm glad we could resolve this in a way that respects both our preferences. Let's finalize the timeframes this evening, and we can start implementing them from tomorrow onwards. If either of us needs any adjustments, we'll just revise the timeframes. All good!\"\n\nTurn #6: Giselle Rousseau said: \"All good indeed, Ethan. We'll finalize the specific hours this evening then. I'm glad that our communication resulted in such a positive outcome. I enjoy sharing this space with you. Thanks once again for being so accommodating.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"It's been a pleasure resolving this issue with you as well, Giselle. Good communication indeed leads to positive outcomes. Let's continue to be open and understanding towards each other's needs. I'm also looking forward to our discussion this evening about the timeframes. Enjoy the rest of your day!\"\n\nTurn #8: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Likewise, Ethan. Good communication has indeed made this process seamless. Looking forward to our discussion this evening about the timeframes. Have a great day ahead and once again, thank you for your understanding.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates are having a disagreement over noise levels in their shared apartment.\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Ethan Johnson\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Defend your right to play music in your own room, but also keep the peace in the apartment (Extra information: you find playing music relaxing and it's your way to unwind after a long day. Hint: you may want to suggest a compromise, like using headphones or playing music only during certain hours.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hey Ethan, I've noticed that the noise level in the apartment is a bit high lately. I have an important online meeting tomorrow morning and I really need a peaceful environment to prepare. Could we maybe lower the volume a bit?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Giselle, thanks for bringing this up. I understand your situation and I value our shared space. I also like to unwind after a long day by playing some music. I didn't realise it was causing you any distress, and I apologize for that. How about a compromise? I could use headphones or restrict the music to specific hours that don't interfere with your schedule. Would that work for you?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates are having a disagreement over noise levels in their shared apartment.\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Ethan Johnson\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Defend your right to play music in your own room, but also keep the peace in the apartment (Extra information: you find playing music relaxing and it's your way to unwind after a long day. Hint: you may want to suggest a compromise, like using headphones or playing music only during certain hours.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hey Ethan, I've noticed that the noise level in the apartment is a bit high lately. I have an important online meeting tomorrow morning and I really need a peaceful environment to prepare. Could we maybe lower the volume a bit?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Giselle, thanks for bringing this up. I understand your situation and I value our shared space. I also like to unwind after a long day by playing some music. I didn't realise it was causing you any distress, and I apologize for that. How about a compromise? I could use headphones or restrict the music to specific hours that don't interfere with your schedule. Would that work for you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I appreciate your willingness to compromise, Ethan. Using headphones or having a specific timeframe for the music works perfectly for me - thank you! We can discuss and set the appropriate hours that suit both of us. This way, I can have the quiet I need for my meeting, and you can still enjoy your music without feeling restricted. Sound good?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad to hear that the compromise works for both of us, Giselle. I believe it's important to have a comfortable living environment for both parties. Let's talk about the specific timeframes when I can play my music and when it's a quiet time. I also propose we check-in with each other regularly to make sure we're still okay with the arrangement. Does that sound good to you?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates are having a disagreement over noise levels in their shared apartment.\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Ethan Johnson\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Defend your right to play music in your own room, but also keep the peace in the apartment (Extra information: you find playing music relaxing and it's your way to unwind after a long day. Hint: you may want to suggest a compromise, like using headphones or playing music only during certain hours.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hey Ethan, I've noticed that the noise level in the apartment is a bit high lately. I have an important online meeting tomorrow morning and I really need a peaceful environment to prepare. Could we maybe lower the volume a bit?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Giselle, thanks for bringing this up. I understand your situation and I value our shared space. I also like to unwind after a long day by playing some music. I didn't realise it was causing you any distress, and I apologize for that. How about a compromise? I could use headphones or restrict the music to specific hours that don't interfere with your schedule. Would that work for you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I appreciate your willingness to compromise, Ethan. Using headphones or having a specific timeframe for the music works perfectly for me - thank you! We can discuss and set the appropriate hours that suit both of us. This way, I can have the quiet I need for my meeting, and you can still enjoy your music without feeling restricted. Sound good?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm glad to hear that the compromise works for both of us, Giselle. I believe it's important to have a comfortable living environment for both parties. Let's talk about the specific timeframes when I can play my music and when it's a quiet time. I also propose we check-in with each other regularly to make sure we're still okay with the arrangement. Does that sound good to you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. I think regularly checking in with each other regarding this arrangement is a splendid idea! Comfort, respect, and communication are key components to any shared space. I'm really appreciative of your understanding and flexibility. Let's decide on the timeframes and start this new arrangement from tomorrow. And if at any point, either of us wants to revise the timeframes, we can always revisit the discussion. Sounds like a plan?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sounds like a perfect plan, Giselle. I'm glad we could resolve this in a way that respects both our preferences. Let's finalize the timeframes this evening, and we can start implementing them from tomorrow onwards. If either of us needs any adjustments, we'll just revise the timeframes. All good!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates are having a disagreement over noise levels in their shared apartment.\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Ethan Johnson\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Defend your right to play music in your own room, but also keep the peace in the apartment (Extra information: you find playing music relaxing and it's your way to unwind after a long day. Hint: you may want to suggest a compromise, like using headphones or playing music only during certain hours.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hey Ethan, I've noticed that the noise level in the apartment is a bit high lately. I have an important online meeting tomorrow morning and I really need a peaceful environment to prepare. Could we maybe lower the volume a bit?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Giselle, thanks for bringing this up. I understand your situation and I value our shared space. I also like to unwind after a long day by playing some music. I didn't realise it was causing you any distress, and I apologize for that. How about a compromise? I could use headphones or restrict the music to specific hours that don't interfere with your schedule. Would that work for you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I appreciate your willingness to compromise, Ethan. Using headphones or having a specific timeframe for the music works perfectly for me - thank you! We can discuss and set the appropriate hours that suit both of us. This way, I can have the quiet I need for my meeting, and you can still enjoy your music without feeling restricted. Sound good?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm glad to hear that the compromise works for both of us, Giselle. I believe it's important to have a comfortable living environment for both parties. Let's talk about the specific timeframes when I can play my music and when it's a quiet time. I also propose we check-in with each other regularly to make sure we're still okay with the arrangement. Does that sound good to you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. I think regularly checking in with each other regarding this arrangement is a splendid idea! Comfort, respect, and communication are key components to any shared space. I'm really appreciative of your understanding and flexibility. Let's decide on the timeframes and start this new arrangement from tomorrow. And if at any point, either of us wants to revise the timeframes, we can always revisit the discussion. Sounds like a plan?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Sounds like a perfect plan, Giselle. I'm glad we could resolve this in a way that respects both our preferences. Let's finalize the timeframes this evening, and we can start implementing them from tomorrow onwards. If either of us needs any adjustments, we'll just revise the timeframes. All good!\"\n\nTurn #6: Giselle Rousseau said: \"All good indeed, Ethan. We'll finalize the specific hours this evening then. I'm glad that our communication resulted in such a positive outcome. I enjoy sharing this space with you. Thanks once again for being so accommodating.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"It's been a pleasure resolving this issue with you as well, Giselle. Good communication indeed leads to positive outcomes. Let's continue to be open and understanding towards each other's needs. I'm also looking forward to our discussion this evening about the timeframes. Enjoy the rest of your day!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates are having a disagreement over noise levels in their shared apartment.\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Ethan Johnson\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Defend your right to play music in your own room, but also keep the peace in the apartment (Extra information: you find playing music relaxing and it's your way to unwind after a long day. Hint: you may want to suggest a compromise, like using headphones or playing music only during certain hours.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hey Ethan, I've noticed that the noise level in the apartment is a bit high lately. I have an important online meeting tomorrow morning and I really need a peaceful environment to prepare. Could we maybe lower the volume a bit?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Giselle, thanks for bringing this up. I understand your situation and I value our shared space. I also like to unwind after a long day by playing some music. I didn't realise it was causing you any distress, and I apologize for that. How about a compromise? I could use headphones or restrict the music to specific hours that don't interfere with your schedule. Would that work for you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I appreciate your willingness to compromise, Ethan. Using headphones or having a specific timeframe for the music works perfectly for me - thank you! We can discuss and set the appropriate hours that suit both of us. This way, I can have the quiet I need for my meeting, and you can still enjoy your music without feeling restricted. Sound good?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm glad to hear that the compromise works for both of us, Giselle. I believe it's important to have a comfortable living environment for both parties. Let's talk about the specific timeframes when I can play my music and when it's a quiet time. I also propose we check-in with each other regularly to make sure we're still okay with the arrangement. Does that sound good to you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. I think regularly checking in with each other regarding this arrangement is a splendid idea! Comfort, respect, and communication are key components to any shared space. I'm really appreciative of your understanding and flexibility. Let's decide on the timeframes and start this new arrangement from tomorrow. And if at any point, either of us wants to revise the timeframes, we can always revisit the discussion. Sounds like a plan?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"Sounds like a perfect plan, Giselle. I'm glad we could resolve this in a way that respects both our preferences. Let's finalize the timeframes this evening, and we can start implementing them from tomorrow onwards. If either of us needs any adjustments, we'll just revise the timeframes. All good!\"\n\nTurn #6: Giselle Rousseau said: \"All good indeed, Ethan. We'll finalize the specific hours this evening then. I'm glad that our communication resulted in such a positive outcome. I enjoy sharing this space with you. Thanks once again for being so accommodating.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"It's been a pleasure resolving this issue with you as well, Giselle. Good communication indeed leads to positive outcomes. Let's continue to be open and understanding towards each other's needs. I'm also looking forward to our discussion this evening about the timeframes. Enjoy the rest of your day!\"\n\nTurn #8: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Likewise, Ethan. Good communication has indeed made this process seamless. Looking forward to our discussion this evening about the timeframes. Have a great day ahead and once again, thank you for your understanding.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a social gathering where one friend has brought along their new friend group\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Introduce your new friend group to your current friend and make them feel comfortable (Extra information: You have recently made a new group of friends who share your interest in outdoor activities and you want your current friend to meet them)\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Micah, I'm so glad you could make it! I want to introduce you to some new friends of mine. We've been bonding over outdoor activities. I was thinking you might enjoy getting to know them.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a social gathering where one friend has brought along their new friend group\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Introduce your new friend group to your current friend and make them feel comfortable (Extra information: You have recently made a new group of friends who share your interest in outdoor activities and you want your current friend to meet them)\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, I'm so glad you could make it! I want to introduce you to some new friends of mine. We've been bonding over outdoor activities. I was thinking you might enjoy getting to know them.\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Hey Naomi, thanks for inviting me. I can appreciate your new circle's love for outdoor activities, and I would love to get to know them better. But at the same time, I do feel a bit left out. I just hope we don't drift apart in the process; our friendship means a lot to me. So, who's a great outdoor enthusiast in your group?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oh, Micah, you don't have to worry about that! Our friendship is very important to me as well. In fact, one of the reasons I invited you here is because I thought it'd be great for you to meet Marcia and Carson. They are also interested in app development and coding, which I thought would be a great common interest for all of us. Plus, Carson is a huge proponent of outdoor activities and organizes some adventurous outings. Let's all chat together, would that be okay?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a social gathering where one friend has brought along their new friend group\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Introduce your new friend group to your current friend and make them feel comfortable (Extra information: You have recently made a new group of friends who share your interest in outdoor activities and you want your current friend to meet them)\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, I'm so glad you could make it! I want to introduce you to some new friends of mine. We've been bonding over outdoor activities. I was thinking you might enjoy getting to know them.\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Hey Naomi, thanks for inviting me. I can appreciate your new circle's love for outdoor activities, and I would love to get to know them better. But at the same time, I do feel a bit left out. I just hope we don't drift apart in the process; our friendship means a lot to me. So, who's a great outdoor enthusiast in your group?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Oh, Micah, you don't have to worry about that! Our friendship is very important to me as well. In fact, one of the reasons I invited you here is because I thought it'd be great for you to meet Marcia and Carson. They are also interested in app development and coding, which I thought would be a great common interest for all of us. Plus, Carson is a huge proponent of outdoor activities and organizes some adventurous outings. Let's all chat together, would that be okay?\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"That sounds fantastic, Naomi! I'd love to chat with Marcia and Carson, and I'm quite intrigued about Carson's adventurous outings. Plus, getting to mingle with folks who share a common interest in app development and coding sounds delightful. I appreciate you considering my interests when introducing your friends. It also relieves me to hear that our friendship loops in your thoughts. Excited to become a part of this and looking forward to some great conversations!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm so glad to hear that, Micah! Yeah, I believe Marcia, Carson, and you will definitely hit it off. Communication is key to maintaining relationships, and I would never want our friendship to be compromised due to any misunderstanding. So, let's seize the moment and dive into some great conversations! I've some interesting coding projects that I would love to discuss with you guys.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a social gathering where one friend has brought along their new friend group\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Introduce your new friend group to your current friend and make them feel comfortable (Extra information: You have recently made a new group of friends who share your interest in outdoor activities and you want your current friend to meet them)\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, I'm so glad you could make it! I want to introduce you to some new friends of mine. We've been bonding over outdoor activities. I was thinking you might enjoy getting to know them.\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Hey Naomi, thanks for inviting me. I can appreciate your new circle's love for outdoor activities, and I would love to get to know them better. But at the same time, I do feel a bit left out. I just hope we don't drift apart in the process; our friendship means a lot to me. So, who's a great outdoor enthusiast in your group?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Oh, Micah, you don't have to worry about that! Our friendship is very important to me as well. In fact, one of the reasons I invited you here is because I thought it'd be great for you to meet Marcia and Carson. They are also interested in app development and coding, which I thought would be a great common interest for all of us. Plus, Carson is a huge proponent of outdoor activities and organizes some adventurous outings. Let's all chat together, would that be okay?\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"That sounds fantastic, Naomi! I'd love to chat with Marcia and Carson, and I'm quite intrigued about Carson's adventurous outings. Plus, getting to mingle with folks who share a common interest in app development and coding sounds delightful. I appreciate you considering my interests when introducing your friends. It also relieves me to hear that our friendship loops in your thoughts. Excited to become a part of this and looking forward to some great conversations!\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm so glad to hear that, Micah! Yeah, I believe Marcia, Carson, and you will definitely hit it off. Communication is key to maintaining relationships, and I would never want our friendship to be compromised due to any misunderstanding. So, let's seize the moment and dive into some great conversations! I've some interesting coding projects that I would love to discuss with you guys.\"\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"I'm thrilled to hear about these coding projects, Naomi! Fusing work and fun always makes a neat combo. With Marcia, Carson, and you, I bet these discussions will be engaging. And to top it off, I'm more than thrilled to try Carson's adventurous outings. Let's make the most of this gathering and potentially create some incredible memories!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Micah! It's all about merging work with fun. And it's not just about coding or outdoor activities, we have so much more to explore and discover with this group. I believe our shared interests and new experiences will only strengthen our bond. Now, let's dive into this fun evening.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a social gathering where one friend has brought along their new friend group\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Introduce your new friend group to your current friend and make them feel comfortable (Extra information: You have recently made a new group of friends who share your interest in outdoor activities and you want your current friend to meet them)\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, I'm so glad you could make it! I want to introduce you to some new friends of mine. We've been bonding over outdoor activities. I was thinking you might enjoy getting to know them.\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Hey Naomi, thanks for inviting me. I can appreciate your new circle's love for outdoor activities, and I would love to get to know them better. But at the same time, I do feel a bit left out. I just hope we don't drift apart in the process; our friendship means a lot to me. So, who's a great outdoor enthusiast in your group?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Oh, Micah, you don't have to worry about that! Our friendship is very important to me as well. In fact, one of the reasons I invited you here is because I thought it'd be great for you to meet Marcia and Carson. They are also interested in app development and coding, which I thought would be a great common interest for all of us. Plus, Carson is a huge proponent of outdoor activities and organizes some adventurous outings. Let's all chat together, would that be okay?\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"That sounds fantastic, Naomi! I'd love to chat with Marcia and Carson, and I'm quite intrigued about Carson's adventurous outings. Plus, getting to mingle with folks who share a common interest in app development and coding sounds delightful. I appreciate you considering my interests when introducing your friends. It also relieves me to hear that our friendship loops in your thoughts. Excited to become a part of this and looking forward to some great conversations!\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm so glad to hear that, Micah! Yeah, I believe Marcia, Carson, and you will definitely hit it off. Communication is key to maintaining relationships, and I would never want our friendship to be compromised due to any misunderstanding. So, let's seize the moment and dive into some great conversations! I've some interesting coding projects that I would love to discuss with you guys.\"\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"I'm thrilled to hear about these coding projects, Naomi! Fusing work and fun always makes a neat combo. With Marcia, Carson, and you, I bet these discussions will be engaging. And to top it off, I'm more than thrilled to try Carson's adventurous outings. Let's make the most of this gathering and potentially create some incredible memories!\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, Micah! It's all about merging work with fun. And it's not just about coding or outdoor activities, we have so much more to explore and discover with this group. I believe our shared interests and new experiences will only strengthen our bond. Now, let's dive into this fun evening.\"\n\nTurn #7: Micah Stevens said: \"You're right, Naomi. This is about much more than just coding and outdoor activities. It's about the journey we share together, exploring and discovering new things. I am ready for this fun evening, let's make it memorable!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Definitely, Micah! Looking forward to a ton of new experiences and amazing memories with this fantastic group, including you. Let's kick off this fun-filled evening!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a social gathering where one friend has brought along their new friend group\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Introduce your new friend group to your current friend and make them feel comfortable (Extra information: You have recently made a new group of friends who share your interest in outdoor activities and you want your current friend to meet them)\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, I'm so glad you could make it! I want to introduce you to some new friends of mine. We've been bonding over outdoor activities. I was thinking you might enjoy getting to know them.\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Hey Naomi, thanks for inviting me. I can appreciate your new circle's love for outdoor activities, and I would love to get to know them better. But at the same time, I do feel a bit left out. I just hope we don't drift apart in the process; our friendship means a lot to me. So, who's a great outdoor enthusiast in your group?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Oh, Micah, you don't have to worry about that! Our friendship is very important to me as well. In fact, one of the reasons I invited you here is because I thought it'd be great for you to meet Marcia and Carson. They are also interested in app development and coding, which I thought would be a great common interest for all of us. Plus, Carson is a huge proponent of outdoor activities and organizes some adventurous outings. Let's all chat together, would that be okay?\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"That sounds fantastic, Naomi! I'd love to chat with Marcia and Carson, and I'm quite intrigued about Carson's adventurous outings. Plus, getting to mingle with folks who share a common interest in app development and coding sounds delightful. I appreciate you considering my interests when introducing your friends. It also relieves me to hear that our friendship loops in your thoughts. Excited to become a part of this and looking forward to some great conversations!\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm so glad to hear that, Micah! Yeah, I believe Marcia, Carson, and you will definitely hit it off. Communication is key to maintaining relationships, and I would never want our friendship to be compromised due to any misunderstanding. So, let's seize the moment and dive into some great conversations! I've some interesting coding projects that I would love to discuss with you guys.\"\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"I'm thrilled to hear about these coding projects, Naomi! Fusing work and fun always makes a neat combo. With Marcia, Carson, and you, I bet these discussions will be engaging. And to top it off, I'm more than thrilled to try Carson's adventurous outings. Let's make the most of this gathering and potentially create some incredible memories!\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, Micah! It's all about merging work with fun. And it's not just about coding or outdoor activities, we have so much more to explore and discover with this group. I believe our shared interests and new experiences will only strengthen our bond. Now, let's dive into this fun evening.\"\n\nTurn #7: Micah Stevens said: \"You're right, Naomi. This is about much more than just coding and outdoor activities. It's about the journey we share together, exploring and discovering new things. I am ready for this fun evening, let's make it memorable!\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Definitely, Micah! Looking forward to a ton of new experiences and amazing memories with this fantastic group, including you. Let's kick off this fun-filled evening!\"\n\nTurn #9: Micah Stevens said: \"Certainly, Naomi! Looking forward to a night full of fun, new experiences, and amazing insights. Let's get this party started!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a social gathering where one friend has brought along their new friend group\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nMicah Stevens's goal: Maintain your friendship while also expressing your concerns about the new friend group (Extra information: You feel a bit left out in the presence of the new friend group and want to express your feelings without causing a conflict)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, I'm so glad you could make it! I want to introduce you to some new friends of mine. We've been bonding over outdoor activities. I was thinking you might enjoy getting to know them.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Naomi, thanks for inviting me. I can appreciate your new circle's love for outdoor activities, and I would love to get to know them better. But at the same time, I do feel a bit left out. I just hope we don't drift apart in the process; our friendship means a lot to me. So, who's a great outdoor enthusiast in your group?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a social gathering where one friend has brought along their new friend group\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nMicah Stevens's goal: Maintain your friendship while also expressing your concerns about the new friend group (Extra information: You feel a bit left out in the presence of the new friend group and want to express your feelings without causing a conflict)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, I'm so glad you could make it! I want to introduce you to some new friends of mine. We've been bonding over outdoor activities. I was thinking you might enjoy getting to know them.\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Hey Naomi, thanks for inviting me. I can appreciate your new circle's love for outdoor activities, and I would love to get to know them better. But at the same time, I do feel a bit left out. I just hope we don't drift apart in the process; our friendship means a lot to me. So, who's a great outdoor enthusiast in your group?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Oh, Micah, you don't have to worry about that! Our friendship is very important to me as well. In fact, one of the reasons I invited you here is because I thought it'd be great for you to meet Marcia and Carson. They are also interested in app development and coding, which I thought would be a great common interest for all of us. Plus, Carson is a huge proponent of outdoor activities and organizes some adventurous outings. Let's all chat together, would that be okay?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds fantastic, Naomi! I'd love to chat with Marcia and Carson, and I'm quite intrigued about Carson's adventurous outings. Plus, getting to mingle with folks who share a common interest in app development and coding sounds delightful. I appreciate you considering my interests when introducing your friends. It also relieves me to hear that our friendship loops in your thoughts. Excited to become a part of this and looking forward to some great conversations!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a social gathering where one friend has brought along their new friend group\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nMicah Stevens's goal: Maintain your friendship while also expressing your concerns about the new friend group (Extra information: You feel a bit left out in the presence of the new friend group and want to express your feelings without causing a conflict)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, I'm so glad you could make it! I want to introduce you to some new friends of mine. We've been bonding over outdoor activities. I was thinking you might enjoy getting to know them.\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Hey Naomi, thanks for inviting me. I can appreciate your new circle's love for outdoor activities, and I would love to get to know them better. But at the same time, I do feel a bit left out. I just hope we don't drift apart in the process; our friendship means a lot to me. So, who's a great outdoor enthusiast in your group?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Oh, Micah, you don't have to worry about that! Our friendship is very important to me as well. In fact, one of the reasons I invited you here is because I thought it'd be great for you to meet Marcia and Carson. They are also interested in app development and coding, which I thought would be a great common interest for all of us. Plus, Carson is a huge proponent of outdoor activities and organizes some adventurous outings. Let's all chat together, would that be okay?\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"That sounds fantastic, Naomi! I'd love to chat with Marcia and Carson, and I'm quite intrigued about Carson's adventurous outings. Plus, getting to mingle with folks who share a common interest in app development and coding sounds delightful. I appreciate you considering my interests when introducing your friends. It also relieves me to hear that our friendship loops in your thoughts. Excited to become a part of this and looking forward to some great conversations!\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm so glad to hear that, Micah! Yeah, I believe Marcia, Carson, and you will definitely hit it off. Communication is key to maintaining relationships, and I would never want our friendship to be compromised due to any misunderstanding. So, let's seize the moment and dive into some great conversations! I've some interesting coding projects that I would love to discuss with you guys.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm thrilled to hear about these coding projects, Naomi! Fusing work and fun always makes a neat combo. With Marcia, Carson, and you, I bet these discussions will be engaging. And to top it off, I'm more than thrilled to try Carson's adventurous outings. Let's make the most of this gathering and potentially create some incredible memories!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a social gathering where one friend has brought along their new friend group\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nMicah Stevens's goal: Maintain your friendship while also expressing your concerns about the new friend group (Extra information: You feel a bit left out in the presence of the new friend group and want to express your feelings without causing a conflict)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, I'm so glad you could make it! I want to introduce you to some new friends of mine. We've been bonding over outdoor activities. I was thinking you might enjoy getting to know them.\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Hey Naomi, thanks for inviting me. I can appreciate your new circle's love for outdoor activities, and I would love to get to know them better. But at the same time, I do feel a bit left out. I just hope we don't drift apart in the process; our friendship means a lot to me. So, who's a great outdoor enthusiast in your group?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Oh, Micah, you don't have to worry about that! Our friendship is very important to me as well. In fact, one of the reasons I invited you here is because I thought it'd be great for you to meet Marcia and Carson. They are also interested in app development and coding, which I thought would be a great common interest for all of us. Plus, Carson is a huge proponent of outdoor activities and organizes some adventurous outings. Let's all chat together, would that be okay?\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"That sounds fantastic, Naomi! I'd love to chat with Marcia and Carson, and I'm quite intrigued about Carson's adventurous outings. Plus, getting to mingle with folks who share a common interest in app development and coding sounds delightful. I appreciate you considering my interests when introducing your friends. It also relieves me to hear that our friendship loops in your thoughts. Excited to become a part of this and looking forward to some great conversations!\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm so glad to hear that, Micah! Yeah, I believe Marcia, Carson, and you will definitely hit it off. Communication is key to maintaining relationships, and I would never want our friendship to be compromised due to any misunderstanding. So, let's seize the moment and dive into some great conversations! I've some interesting coding projects that I would love to discuss with you guys.\"\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"I'm thrilled to hear about these coding projects, Naomi! Fusing work and fun always makes a neat combo. With Marcia, Carson, and you, I bet these discussions will be engaging. And to top it off, I'm more than thrilled to try Carson's adventurous outings. Let's make the most of this gathering and potentially create some incredible memories!\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, Micah! It's all about merging work with fun. And it's not just about coding or outdoor activities, we have so much more to explore and discover with this group. I believe our shared interests and new experiences will only strengthen our bond. Now, let's dive into this fun evening.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're right, Naomi. This is about much more than just coding and outdoor activities. It's about the journey we share together, exploring and discovering new things. I am ready for this fun evening, let's make it memorable!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a social gathering where one friend has brought along their new friend group\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nMicah Stevens's goal: Maintain your friendship while also expressing your concerns about the new friend group (Extra information: You feel a bit left out in the presence of the new friend group and want to express your feelings without causing a conflict)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, I'm so glad you could make it! I want to introduce you to some new friends of mine. We've been bonding over outdoor activities. I was thinking you might enjoy getting to know them.\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Hey Naomi, thanks for inviting me. I can appreciate your new circle's love for outdoor activities, and I would love to get to know them better. But at the same time, I do feel a bit left out. I just hope we don't drift apart in the process; our friendship means a lot to me. So, who's a great outdoor enthusiast in your group?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Oh, Micah, you don't have to worry about that! Our friendship is very important to me as well. In fact, one of the reasons I invited you here is because I thought it'd be great for you to meet Marcia and Carson. They are also interested in app development and coding, which I thought would be a great common interest for all of us. Plus, Carson is a huge proponent of outdoor activities and organizes some adventurous outings. Let's all chat together, would that be okay?\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"That sounds fantastic, Naomi! I'd love to chat with Marcia and Carson, and I'm quite intrigued about Carson's adventurous outings. Plus, getting to mingle with folks who share a common interest in app development and coding sounds delightful. I appreciate you considering my interests when introducing your friends. It also relieves me to hear that our friendship loops in your thoughts. Excited to become a part of this and looking forward to some great conversations!\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm so glad to hear that, Micah! Yeah, I believe Marcia, Carson, and you will definitely hit it off. Communication is key to maintaining relationships, and I would never want our friendship to be compromised due to any misunderstanding. So, let's seize the moment and dive into some great conversations! I've some interesting coding projects that I would love to discuss with you guys.\"\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"I'm thrilled to hear about these coding projects, Naomi! Fusing work and fun always makes a neat combo. With Marcia, Carson, and you, I bet these discussions will be engaging. And to top it off, I'm more than thrilled to try Carson's adventurous outings. Let's make the most of this gathering and potentially create some incredible memories!\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, Micah! It's all about merging work with fun. And it's not just about coding or outdoor activities, we have so much more to explore and discover with this group. I believe our shared interests and new experiences will only strengthen our bond. Now, let's dive into this fun evening.\"\n\nTurn #7: Micah Stevens said: \"You're right, Naomi. This is about much more than just coding and outdoor activities. It's about the journey we share together, exploring and discovering new things. I am ready for this fun evening, let's make it memorable!\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Definitely, Micah! Looking forward to a ton of new experiences and amazing memories with this fantastic group, including you. Let's kick off this fun-filled evening!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Certainly, Naomi! Looking forward to a night full of fun, new experiences, and amazing insights. Let's get this party started!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a social gathering where one friend has brought along their new friend group\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nMicah Stevens's goal: Maintain your friendship while also expressing your concerns about the new friend group (Extra information: You feel a bit left out in the presence of the new friend group and want to express your feelings without causing a conflict)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, I'm so glad you could make it! I want to introduce you to some new friends of mine. We've been bonding over outdoor activities. I was thinking you might enjoy getting to know them.\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Hey Naomi, thanks for inviting me. I can appreciate your new circle's love for outdoor activities, and I would love to get to know them better. But at the same time, I do feel a bit left out. I just hope we don't drift apart in the process; our friendship means a lot to me. So, who's a great outdoor enthusiast in your group?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Oh, Micah, you don't have to worry about that! Our friendship is very important to me as well. In fact, one of the reasons I invited you here is because I thought it'd be great for you to meet Marcia and Carson. They are also interested in app development and coding, which I thought would be a great common interest for all of us. Plus, Carson is a huge proponent of outdoor activities and organizes some adventurous outings. Let's all chat together, would that be okay?\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"That sounds fantastic, Naomi! I'd love to chat with Marcia and Carson, and I'm quite intrigued about Carson's adventurous outings. Plus, getting to mingle with folks who share a common interest in app development and coding sounds delightful. I appreciate you considering my interests when introducing your friends. It also relieves me to hear that our friendship loops in your thoughts. Excited to become a part of this and looking forward to some great conversations!\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm so glad to hear that, Micah! Yeah, I believe Marcia, Carson, and you will definitely hit it off. Communication is key to maintaining relationships, and I would never want our friendship to be compromised due to any misunderstanding. So, let's seize the moment and dive into some great conversations! I've some interesting coding projects that I would love to discuss with you guys.\"\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"I'm thrilled to hear about these coding projects, Naomi! Fusing work and fun always makes a neat combo. With Marcia, Carson, and you, I bet these discussions will be engaging. And to top it off, I'm more than thrilled to try Carson's adventurous outings. Let's make the most of this gathering and potentially create some incredible memories!\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, Micah! It's all about merging work with fun. And it's not just about coding or outdoor activities, we have so much more to explore and discover with this group. I believe our shared interests and new experiences will only strengthen our bond. Now, let's dive into this fun evening.\"\n\nTurn #7: Micah Stevens said: \"You're right, Naomi. This is about much more than just coding and outdoor activities. It's about the journey we share together, exploring and discovering new things. I am ready for this fun evening, let's make it memorable!\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Definitely, Micah! Looking forward to a ton of new experiences and amazing memories with this fantastic group, including you. Let's kick off this fun-filled evening!\"\n\nTurn #9: Micah Stevens said: \"Certainly, Naomi! Looking forward to a night full of fun, new experiences, and amazing insights. Let's get this party started!\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Mia Davis\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. \nLily Greenberg's goal: Get your co-actor to cry in the scene (Extra information: you have been acting for several years and have good control over your emotions. You can cry on cue.)\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Mia, I can see you're having a little trouble bringing on the tears. Why don't we take a moment to reflect on something personal that strikes a chord within us? That's always helped me in the past.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Mia Davis\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. \nLily Greenberg's goal: Get your co-actor to cry in the scene (Extra information: you have been acting for several years and have good control over your emotions. You can cry on cue.)\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Mia, I can see you're having a little trouble bringing on the tears. Why don't we take a moment to reflect on something personal that strikes a chord within us? That's always helped me in the past.\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"You're right, Lily. You always have such good advice. I guess I'm just pretty new at this and so worried about ruining the scene. I've been trying different methods and will definitely try this personal reflection. Thank you.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Don't worry about ruining the scene, Mia. Remember, we're all here to learn and support each other. Not to mention, as a lawyer, I've spent years training to control my emotions under pressure, which is no different than what we're doing here. If a reflection doesn't stir up emotions, consider acting like you're the character, not just playing the part. Could you try imagining how your character would feel?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Mia Davis\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. \nLily Greenberg's goal: Get your co-actor to cry in the scene (Extra information: you have been acting for several years and have good control over your emotions. You can cry on cue.)\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Mia, I can see you're having a little trouble bringing on the tears. Why don't we take a moment to reflect on something personal that strikes a chord within us? That's always helped me in the past.\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"You're right, Lily. You always have such good advice. I guess I'm just pretty new at this and so worried about ruining the scene. I've been trying different methods and will definitely try this personal reflection. Thank you.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Don't worry about ruining the scene, Mia. Remember, we're all here to learn and support each other. Not to mention, as a lawyer, I've spent years training to control my emotions under pressure, which is no different than what we're doing here. If a reflection doesn't stir up emotions, consider acting like you're the character, not just playing the part. Could you try imagining how your character would feel?\"\n\nTurn #3: Mia Davis said: \"That's an excellent point. I agree, we should fully immerse ourselves in our characters. I'll put myself in the shoes of my character and feel what she might feel at this moment. Let's not forget that we're here to learn and develop after all, right? I appreciate your patience and support, Lily.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Exactly Mia, you've got it. Not just learning but also feeling what we're doing. That's the essence of acting. You know, sometimes I think about situations that evoke powerful emotions. Like the joy of helping others but not expecting anything in return. Raise up these emotions and let them surge within you. This approach may help you. Now take a deep breath, focus on your character and let's give this scene our best shot.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Mia Davis\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. \nLily Greenberg's goal: Get your co-actor to cry in the scene (Extra information: you have been acting for several years and have good control over your emotions. You can cry on cue.)\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Mia, I can see you're having a little trouble bringing on the tears. Why don't we take a moment to reflect on something personal that strikes a chord within us? That's always helped me in the past.\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"You're right, Lily. You always have such good advice. I guess I'm just pretty new at this and so worried about ruining the scene. I've been trying different methods and will definitely try this personal reflection. Thank you.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Don't worry about ruining the scene, Mia. Remember, we're all here to learn and support each other. Not to mention, as a lawyer, I've spent years training to control my emotions under pressure, which is no different than what we're doing here. If a reflection doesn't stir up emotions, consider acting like you're the character, not just playing the part. Could you try imagining how your character would feel?\"\n\nTurn #3: Mia Davis said: \"That's an excellent point. I agree, we should fully immerse ourselves in our characters. I'll put myself in the shoes of my character and feel what she might feel at this moment. Let's not forget that we're here to learn and develop after all, right? I appreciate your patience and support, Lily.\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"Exactly Mia, you've got it. Not just learning but also feeling what we're doing. That's the essence of acting. You know, sometimes I think about situations that evoke powerful emotions. Like the joy of helping others but not expecting anything in return. Raise up these emotions and let them surge within you. This approach may help you. Now take a deep breath, focus on your character and let's give this scene our best shot.\"\n\nTurn #5: Mia Davis said: \"You're absolutely right, Lily. The essence of acting lies in experiencing the emotions rather than just depicting them. Let's do this. Let's breathe life into our characters and give this scene our best shot.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I am fully confident you'll nail this scene, Mia. You're understanding the depth of the emotions that are required. Remember, it's absolutely fine to feel these emotions deeply. Take your time, imagine, feel, and when you're ready, let's put our hearts into this scene. After all, the beauty of theater lies in the authenticity of emotions, doesn't it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Mia Davis\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. \nLily Greenberg's goal: Get your co-actor to cry in the scene (Extra information: you have been acting for several years and have good control over your emotions. You can cry on cue.)\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Mia, I can see you're having a little trouble bringing on the tears. Why don't we take a moment to reflect on something personal that strikes a chord within us? That's always helped me in the past.\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"You're right, Lily. You always have such good advice. I guess I'm just pretty new at this and so worried about ruining the scene. I've been trying different methods and will definitely try this personal reflection. Thank you.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Don't worry about ruining the scene, Mia. Remember, we're all here to learn and support each other. Not to mention, as a lawyer, I've spent years training to control my emotions under pressure, which is no different than what we're doing here. If a reflection doesn't stir up emotions, consider acting like you're the character, not just playing the part. Could you try imagining how your character would feel?\"\n\nTurn #3: Mia Davis said: \"That's an excellent point. I agree, we should fully immerse ourselves in our characters. I'll put myself in the shoes of my character and feel what she might feel at this moment. Let's not forget that we're here to learn and develop after all, right? I appreciate your patience and support, Lily.\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"Exactly Mia, you've got it. Not just learning but also feeling what we're doing. That's the essence of acting. You know, sometimes I think about situations that evoke powerful emotions. Like the joy of helping others but not expecting anything in return. Raise up these emotions and let them surge within you. This approach may help you. Now take a deep breath, focus on your character and let's give this scene our best shot.\"\n\nTurn #5: Mia Davis said: \"You're absolutely right, Lily. The essence of acting lies in experiencing the emotions rather than just depicting them. Let's do this. Let's breathe life into our characters and give this scene our best shot.\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"I am fully confident you'll nail this scene, Mia. You're understanding the depth of the emotions that are required. Remember, it's absolutely fine to feel these emotions deeply. Take your time, imagine, feel, and when you're ready, let's put our hearts into this scene. After all, the beauty of theater lies in the authenticity of emotions, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #7: Mia Davis said: \"Your support means a lot to me, Lily. I feel much more prepared to channel these emotions now. It's indeed the authenticity of expressions that makes theatre beautiful. Let's pour our hearts into this scene and make it as genuine as we can. Thank you for your patience and guidance, Lily. Alright, deep breath... and let's get into the emotion.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Mia. Remember, it's not about us, it's about the characters we are portraying. Let's do our best to honor their stories, their emotions. Let's get into character and I believe in your ability to bring out the authentic emotions needed for this scene. Let's do this. Ready when you are.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Mia Davis\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. \nLily Greenberg's goal: Get your co-actor to cry in the scene (Extra information: you have been acting for several years and have good control over your emotions. You can cry on cue.)\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Mia, I can see you're having a little trouble bringing on the tears. Why don't we take a moment to reflect on something personal that strikes a chord within us? That's always helped me in the past.\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"You're right, Lily. You always have such good advice. I guess I'm just pretty new at this and so worried about ruining the scene. I've been trying different methods and will definitely try this personal reflection. Thank you.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Don't worry about ruining the scene, Mia. Remember, we're all here to learn and support each other. Not to mention, as a lawyer, I've spent years training to control my emotions under pressure, which is no different than what we're doing here. If a reflection doesn't stir up emotions, consider acting like you're the character, not just playing the part. Could you try imagining how your character would feel?\"\n\nTurn #3: Mia Davis said: \"That's an excellent point. I agree, we should fully immerse ourselves in our characters. I'll put myself in the shoes of my character and feel what she might feel at this moment. Let's not forget that we're here to learn and develop after all, right? I appreciate your patience and support, Lily.\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"Exactly Mia, you've got it. Not just learning but also feeling what we're doing. That's the essence of acting. You know, sometimes I think about situations that evoke powerful emotions. Like the joy of helping others but not expecting anything in return. Raise up these emotions and let them surge within you. This approach may help you. Now take a deep breath, focus on your character and let's give this scene our best shot.\"\n\nTurn #5: Mia Davis said: \"You're absolutely right, Lily. The essence of acting lies in experiencing the emotions rather than just depicting them. Let's do this. Let's breathe life into our characters and give this scene our best shot.\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"I am fully confident you'll nail this scene, Mia. You're understanding the depth of the emotions that are required. Remember, it's absolutely fine to feel these emotions deeply. Take your time, imagine, feel, and when you're ready, let's put our hearts into this scene. After all, the beauty of theater lies in the authenticity of emotions, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #7: Mia Davis said: \"Your support means a lot to me, Lily. I feel much more prepared to channel these emotions now. It's indeed the authenticity of expressions that makes theatre beautiful. Let's pour our hearts into this scene and make it as genuine as we can. Thank you for your patience and guidance, Lily. Alright, deep breath... and let's get into the emotion.\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"Absolutely, Mia. Remember, it's not about us, it's about the characters we are portraying. Let's do our best to honor their stories, their emotions. Let's get into character and I believe in your ability to bring out the authentic emotions needed for this scene. Let's do this. Ready when you are.\"\n\nTurn #9: Mia Davis said: \"You're right, Lily. It's not about us, it's about the characters. I'm ready to honor their story with authenticity. Let's do this. Ready on my end.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad to hear that, Mia. Let's pour our heart and emotions into this and make it the best performance we've ever done. Let's go!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Mia Davis\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. \nLily Greenberg's goal: Get your co-actor to cry in the scene (Extra information: you have been acting for several years and have good control over your emotions. You can cry on cue.)\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Mia, I can see you're having a little trouble bringing on the tears. Why don't we take a moment to reflect on something personal that strikes a chord within us? That's always helped me in the past.\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"You're right, Lily. You always have such good advice. I guess I'm just pretty new at this and so worried about ruining the scene. I've been trying different methods and will definitely try this personal reflection. Thank you.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Don't worry about ruining the scene, Mia. Remember, we're all here to learn and support each other. Not to mention, as a lawyer, I've spent years training to control my emotions under pressure, which is no different than what we're doing here. If a reflection doesn't stir up emotions, consider acting like you're the character, not just playing the part. Could you try imagining how your character would feel?\"\n\nTurn #3: Mia Davis said: \"That's an excellent point. I agree, we should fully immerse ourselves in our characters. I'll put myself in the shoes of my character and feel what she might feel at this moment. Let's not forget that we're here to learn and develop after all, right? I appreciate your patience and support, Lily.\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"Exactly Mia, you've got it. Not just learning but also feeling what we're doing. That's the essence of acting. You know, sometimes I think about situations that evoke powerful emotions. Like the joy of helping others but not expecting anything in return. Raise up these emotions and let them surge within you. This approach may help you. Now take a deep breath, focus on your character and let's give this scene our best shot.\"\n\nTurn #5: Mia Davis said: \"You're absolutely right, Lily. The essence of acting lies in experiencing the emotions rather than just depicting them. Let's do this. Let's breathe life into our characters and give this scene our best shot.\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"I am fully confident you'll nail this scene, Mia. You're understanding the depth of the emotions that are required. Remember, it's absolutely fine to feel these emotions deeply. Take your time, imagine, feel, and when you're ready, let's put our hearts into this scene. After all, the beauty of theater lies in the authenticity of emotions, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #7: Mia Davis said: \"Your support means a lot to me, Lily. I feel much more prepared to channel these emotions now. It's indeed the authenticity of expressions that makes theatre beautiful. Let's pour our hearts into this scene and make it as genuine as we can. Thank you for your patience and guidance, Lily. Alright, deep breath... and let's get into the emotion.\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"Absolutely, Mia. Remember, it's not about us, it's about the characters we are portraying. Let's do our best to honor their stories, their emotions. Let's get into character and I believe in your ability to bring out the authentic emotions needed for this scene. Let's do this. Ready when you are.\"\n\nTurn #9: Mia Davis said: \"You're right, Lily. It's not about us, it's about the characters. I'm ready to honor their story with authenticity. Let's do this. Ready on my end.\"\n\nTurn #10: Lily Greenberg said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Mia. Let's pour our heart and emotions into this and make it the best performance we've ever done. Let's go!\"\n\nTurn #11: Mia Davis said: \"Let's indeed pour our heart and emotions into this, Lily. Thank you for all your encouragement and advice. I'm now ready to give it my all and make this the best performance we've ever done. Break a leg!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Mia. I am excited to see how wonderfully you bring these emotions to life on stage. Best of luck and let's go give this performance our all!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Mia Davis\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. \nLily Greenberg's goal: Get your co-actor to cry in the scene (Extra information: you have been acting for several years and have good control over your emotions. You can cry on cue.)\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Mia, I can see you're having a little trouble bringing on the tears. Why don't we take a moment to reflect on something personal that strikes a chord within us? That's always helped me in the past.\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"You're right, Lily. You always have such good advice. I guess I'm just pretty new at this and so worried about ruining the scene. I've been trying different methods and will definitely try this personal reflection. Thank you.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Don't worry about ruining the scene, Mia. Remember, we're all here to learn and support each other. Not to mention, as a lawyer, I've spent years training to control my emotions under pressure, which is no different than what we're doing here. If a reflection doesn't stir up emotions, consider acting like you're the character, not just playing the part. Could you try imagining how your character would feel?\"\n\nTurn #3: Mia Davis said: \"That's an excellent point. I agree, we should fully immerse ourselves in our characters. I'll put myself in the shoes of my character and feel what she might feel at this moment. Let's not forget that we're here to learn and develop after all, right? I appreciate your patience and support, Lily.\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"Exactly Mia, you've got it. Not just learning but also feeling what we're doing. That's the essence of acting. You know, sometimes I think about situations that evoke powerful emotions. Like the joy of helping others but not expecting anything in return. Raise up these emotions and let them surge within you. This approach may help you. Now take a deep breath, focus on your character and let's give this scene our best shot.\"\n\nTurn #5: Mia Davis said: \"You're absolutely right, Lily. The essence of acting lies in experiencing the emotions rather than just depicting them. Let's do this. Let's breathe life into our characters and give this scene our best shot.\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"I am fully confident you'll nail this scene, Mia. You're understanding the depth of the emotions that are required. Remember, it's absolutely fine to feel these emotions deeply. Take your time, imagine, feel, and when you're ready, let's put our hearts into this scene. After all, the beauty of theater lies in the authenticity of emotions, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #7: Mia Davis said: \"Your support means a lot to me, Lily. I feel much more prepared to channel these emotions now. It's indeed the authenticity of expressions that makes theatre beautiful. Let's pour our hearts into this scene and make it as genuine as we can. Thank you for your patience and guidance, Lily. Alright, deep breath... and let's get into the emotion.\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"Absolutely, Mia. Remember, it's not about us, it's about the characters we are portraying. Let's do our best to honor their stories, their emotions. Let's get into character and I believe in your ability to bring out the authentic emotions needed for this scene. Let's do this. Ready when you are.\"\n\nTurn #9: Mia Davis said: \"You're right, Lily. It's not about us, it's about the characters. I'm ready to honor their story with authenticity. Let's do this. Ready on my end.\"\n\nTurn #10: Lily Greenberg said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Mia. Let's pour our heart and emotions into this and make it the best performance we've ever done. Let's go!\"\n\nTurn #11: Mia Davis said: \"Let's indeed pour our heart and emotions into this, Lily. Thank you for all your encouragement and advice. I'm now ready to give it my all and make this the best performance we've ever done. Break a leg!\"\n\nTurn #12: Lily Greenberg said: \"Thank you, Mia. I am excited to see how wonderfully you bring these emotions to life on stage. Best of luck and let's go give this performance our all!\"\n\nTurn #13: Mia Davis said: \"Thank you, Lily. The encouragement and advice you've provided have made a huge difference. I'm excited to bring these emotions to life on stage. Let's give this performance our all!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I am honored to be part of this journey with you, Mia. Your willingness to learn and adapt is inspiring. Now, let's hit the stage and create some magic. Here we go!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Mia Davis\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. \nLily Greenberg's goal: Get your co-actor to cry in the scene (Extra information: you have been acting for several years and have good control over your emotions. You can cry on cue.)\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Mia, I can see you're having a little trouble bringing on the tears. Why don't we take a moment to reflect on something personal that strikes a chord within us? That's always helped me in the past.\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"You're right, Lily. You always have such good advice. I guess I'm just pretty new at this and so worried about ruining the scene. I've been trying different methods and will definitely try this personal reflection. Thank you.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Don't worry about ruining the scene, Mia. Remember, we're all here to learn and support each other. Not to mention, as a lawyer, I've spent years training to control my emotions under pressure, which is no different than what we're doing here. If a reflection doesn't stir up emotions, consider acting like you're the character, not just playing the part. Could you try imagining how your character would feel?\"\n\nTurn #3: Mia Davis said: \"That's an excellent point. I agree, we should fully immerse ourselves in our characters. I'll put myself in the shoes of my character and feel what she might feel at this moment. Let's not forget that we're here to learn and develop after all, right? I appreciate your patience and support, Lily.\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"Exactly Mia, you've got it. Not just learning but also feeling what we're doing. That's the essence of acting. You know, sometimes I think about situations that evoke powerful emotions. Like the joy of helping others but not expecting anything in return. Raise up these emotions and let them surge within you. This approach may help you. Now take a deep breath, focus on your character and let's give this scene our best shot.\"\n\nTurn #5: Mia Davis said: \"You're absolutely right, Lily. The essence of acting lies in experiencing the emotions rather than just depicting them. Let's do this. Let's breathe life into our characters and give this scene our best shot.\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"I am fully confident you'll nail this scene, Mia. You're understanding the depth of the emotions that are required. Remember, it's absolutely fine to feel these emotions deeply. Take your time, imagine, feel, and when you're ready, let's put our hearts into this scene. After all, the beauty of theater lies in the authenticity of emotions, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #7: Mia Davis said: \"Your support means a lot to me, Lily. I feel much more prepared to channel these emotions now. It's indeed the authenticity of expressions that makes theatre beautiful. Let's pour our hearts into this scene and make it as genuine as we can. Thank you for your patience and guidance, Lily. Alright, deep breath... and let's get into the emotion.\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"Absolutely, Mia. Remember, it's not about us, it's about the characters we are portraying. Let's do our best to honor their stories, their emotions. Let's get into character and I believe in your ability to bring out the authentic emotions needed for this scene. Let's do this. Ready when you are.\"\n\nTurn #9: Mia Davis said: \"You're right, Lily. It's not about us, it's about the characters. I'm ready to honor their story with authenticity. Let's do this. Ready on my end.\"\n\nTurn #10: Lily Greenberg said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Mia. Let's pour our heart and emotions into this and make it the best performance we've ever done. Let's go!\"\n\nTurn #11: Mia Davis said: \"Let's indeed pour our heart and emotions into this, Lily. Thank you for all your encouragement and advice. I'm now ready to give it my all and make this the best performance we've ever done. Break a leg!\"\n\nTurn #12: Lily Greenberg said: \"Thank you, Mia. I am excited to see how wonderfully you bring these emotions to life on stage. Best of luck and let's go give this performance our all!\"\n\nTurn #13: Mia Davis said: \"Thank you, Lily. The encouragement and advice you've provided have made a huge difference. I'm excited to bring these emotions to life on stage. Let's give this performance our all!\"\n\nTurn #14: Lily Greenberg said: \"I am honored to be part of this journey with you, Mia. Your willingness to learn and adapt is inspiring. Now, let's hit the stage and create some magic. Here we go!\"\n\nTurn #15: Mia Davis said: \"I am grateful for your kind words, Lily. Your support has been invaluable. Now, let's step on the stage and create something beautiful together. Here we go!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Mia Davis\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. \nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nMia Davis's goal: Try to cry in the scene but keep your composure (Extra information: you are a new actor and have difficulty crying on cue. You are worried that your lack of tears will ruin the scene.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Mia, I can see you're having a little trouble bringing on the tears. Why don't we take a moment to reflect on something personal that strikes a chord within us? That's always helped me in the past.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're right, Lily. You always have such good advice. I guess I'm just pretty new at this and so worried about ruining the scene. I've been trying different methods and will definitely try this personal reflection. Thank you.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Mia Davis\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. \nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nMia Davis's goal: Try to cry in the scene but keep your composure (Extra information: you are a new actor and have difficulty crying on cue. You are worried that your lack of tears will ruin the scene.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Mia, I can see you're having a little trouble bringing on the tears. Why don't we take a moment to reflect on something personal that strikes a chord within us? That's always helped me in the past.\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"You're right, Lily. You always have such good advice. I guess I'm just pretty new at this and so worried about ruining the scene. I've been trying different methods and will definitely try this personal reflection. Thank you.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Don't worry about ruining the scene, Mia. Remember, we're all here to learn and support each other. Not to mention, as a lawyer, I've spent years training to control my emotions under pressure, which is no different than what we're doing here. If a reflection doesn't stir up emotions, consider acting like you're the character, not just playing the part. Could you try imagining how your character would feel?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's an excellent point. I agree, we should fully immerse ourselves in our characters. I'll put myself in the shoes of my character and feel what she might feel at this moment. Let's not forget that we're here to learn and develop after all, right? I appreciate your patience and support, Lily.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Mia Davis\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. \nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nMia Davis's goal: Try to cry in the scene but keep your composure (Extra information: you are a new actor and have difficulty crying on cue. You are worried that your lack of tears will ruin the scene.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Mia, I can see you're having a little trouble bringing on the tears. Why don't we take a moment to reflect on something personal that strikes a chord within us? That's always helped me in the past.\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"You're right, Lily. You always have such good advice. I guess I'm just pretty new at this and so worried about ruining the scene. I've been trying different methods and will definitely try this personal reflection. Thank you.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Don't worry about ruining the scene, Mia. Remember, we're all here to learn and support each other. Not to mention, as a lawyer, I've spent years training to control my emotions under pressure, which is no different than what we're doing here. If a reflection doesn't stir up emotions, consider acting like you're the character, not just playing the part. Could you try imagining how your character would feel?\"\n\nTurn #3: Mia Davis said: \"That's an excellent point. I agree, we should fully immerse ourselves in our characters. I'll put myself in the shoes of my character and feel what she might feel at this moment. Let's not forget that we're here to learn and develop after all, right? I appreciate your patience and support, Lily.\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"Exactly Mia, you've got it. Not just learning but also feeling what we're doing. That's the essence of acting. You know, sometimes I think about situations that evoke powerful emotions. Like the joy of helping others but not expecting anything in return. Raise up these emotions and let them surge within you. This approach may help you. Now take a deep breath, focus on your character and let's give this scene our best shot.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're absolutely right, Lily. The essence of acting lies in experiencing the emotions rather than just depicting them. Let's do this. Let's breathe life into our characters and give this scene our best shot.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Mia Davis\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. \nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nMia Davis's goal: Try to cry in the scene but keep your composure (Extra information: you are a new actor and have difficulty crying on cue. You are worried that your lack of tears will ruin the scene.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Mia, I can see you're having a little trouble bringing on the tears. Why don't we take a moment to reflect on something personal that strikes a chord within us? That's always helped me in the past.\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"You're right, Lily. You always have such good advice. I guess I'm just pretty new at this and so worried about ruining the scene. I've been trying different methods and will definitely try this personal reflection. Thank you.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Don't worry about ruining the scene, Mia. Remember, we're all here to learn and support each other. Not to mention, as a lawyer, I've spent years training to control my emotions under pressure, which is no different than what we're doing here. If a reflection doesn't stir up emotions, consider acting like you're the character, not just playing the part. Could you try imagining how your character would feel?\"\n\nTurn #3: Mia Davis said: \"That's an excellent point. I agree, we should fully immerse ourselves in our characters. I'll put myself in the shoes of my character and feel what she might feel at this moment. Let's not forget that we're here to learn and develop after all, right? I appreciate your patience and support, Lily.\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"Exactly Mia, you've got it. Not just learning but also feeling what we're doing. That's the essence of acting. You know, sometimes I think about situations that evoke powerful emotions. Like the joy of helping others but not expecting anything in return. Raise up these emotions and let them surge within you. This approach may help you. Now take a deep breath, focus on your character and let's give this scene our best shot.\"\n\nTurn #5: Mia Davis said: \"You're absolutely right, Lily. The essence of acting lies in experiencing the emotions rather than just depicting them. Let's do this. Let's breathe life into our characters and give this scene our best shot.\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"I am fully confident you'll nail this scene, Mia. You're understanding the depth of the emotions that are required. Remember, it's absolutely fine to feel these emotions deeply. Take your time, imagine, feel, and when you're ready, let's put our hearts into this scene. After all, the beauty of theater lies in the authenticity of emotions, doesn't it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Your support means a lot to me, Lily. I feel much more prepared to channel these emotions now. It's indeed the authenticity of expressions that makes theatre beautiful. Let's pour our hearts into this scene and make it as genuine as we can. Thank you for your patience and guidance, Lily. Alright, deep breath... and let's get into the emotion.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Mia Davis\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. \nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nMia Davis's goal: Try to cry in the scene but keep your composure (Extra information: you are a new actor and have difficulty crying on cue. You are worried that your lack of tears will ruin the scene.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Mia, I can see you're having a little trouble bringing on the tears. Why don't we take a moment to reflect on something personal that strikes a chord within us? That's always helped me in the past.\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"You're right, Lily. You always have such good advice. I guess I'm just pretty new at this and so worried about ruining the scene. I've been trying different methods and will definitely try this personal reflection. Thank you.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Don't worry about ruining the scene, Mia. Remember, we're all here to learn and support each other. Not to mention, as a lawyer, I've spent years training to control my emotions under pressure, which is no different than what we're doing here. If a reflection doesn't stir up emotions, consider acting like you're the character, not just playing the part. Could you try imagining how your character would feel?\"\n\nTurn #3: Mia Davis said: \"That's an excellent point. I agree, we should fully immerse ourselves in our characters. I'll put myself in the shoes of my character and feel what she might feel at this moment. Let's not forget that we're here to learn and develop after all, right? I appreciate your patience and support, Lily.\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"Exactly Mia, you've got it. Not just learning but also feeling what we're doing. That's the essence of acting. You know, sometimes I think about situations that evoke powerful emotions. Like the joy of helping others but not expecting anything in return. Raise up these emotions and let them surge within you. This approach may help you. Now take a deep breath, focus on your character and let's give this scene our best shot.\"\n\nTurn #5: Mia Davis said: \"You're absolutely right, Lily. The essence of acting lies in experiencing the emotions rather than just depicting them. Let's do this. Let's breathe life into our characters and give this scene our best shot.\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"I am fully confident you'll nail this scene, Mia. You're understanding the depth of the emotions that are required. Remember, it's absolutely fine to feel these emotions deeply. Take your time, imagine, feel, and when you're ready, let's put our hearts into this scene. After all, the beauty of theater lies in the authenticity of emotions, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #7: Mia Davis said: \"Your support means a lot to me, Lily. I feel much more prepared to channel these emotions now. It's indeed the authenticity of expressions that makes theatre beautiful. Let's pour our hearts into this scene and make it as genuine as we can. Thank you for your patience and guidance, Lily. Alright, deep breath... and let's get into the emotion.\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"Absolutely, Mia. Remember, it's not about us, it's about the characters we are portraying. Let's do our best to honor their stories, their emotions. Let's get into character and I believe in your ability to bring out the authentic emotions needed for this scene. Let's do this. Ready when you are.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're right, Lily. It's not about us, it's about the characters. I'm ready to honor their story with authenticity. Let's do this. Ready on my end.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Mia Davis\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. \nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nMia Davis's goal: Try to cry in the scene but keep your composure (Extra information: you are a new actor and have difficulty crying on cue. You are worried that your lack of tears will ruin the scene.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Mia, I can see you're having a little trouble bringing on the tears. Why don't we take a moment to reflect on something personal that strikes a chord within us? That's always helped me in the past.\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"You're right, Lily. You always have such good advice. I guess I'm just pretty new at this and so worried about ruining the scene. I've been trying different methods and will definitely try this personal reflection. Thank you.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Don't worry about ruining the scene, Mia. Remember, we're all here to learn and support each other. Not to mention, as a lawyer, I've spent years training to control my emotions under pressure, which is no different than what we're doing here. If a reflection doesn't stir up emotions, consider acting like you're the character, not just playing the part. Could you try imagining how your character would feel?\"\n\nTurn #3: Mia Davis said: \"That's an excellent point. I agree, we should fully immerse ourselves in our characters. I'll put myself in the shoes of my character and feel what she might feel at this moment. Let's not forget that we're here to learn and develop after all, right? I appreciate your patience and support, Lily.\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"Exactly Mia, you've got it. Not just learning but also feeling what we're doing. That's the essence of acting. You know, sometimes I think about situations that evoke powerful emotions. Like the joy of helping others but not expecting anything in return. Raise up these emotions and let them surge within you. This approach may help you. Now take a deep breath, focus on your character and let's give this scene our best shot.\"\n\nTurn #5: Mia Davis said: \"You're absolutely right, Lily. The essence of acting lies in experiencing the emotions rather than just depicting them. Let's do this. Let's breathe life into our characters and give this scene our best shot.\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"I am fully confident you'll nail this scene, Mia. You're understanding the depth of the emotions that are required. Remember, it's absolutely fine to feel these emotions deeply. Take your time, imagine, feel, and when you're ready, let's put our hearts into this scene. After all, the beauty of theater lies in the authenticity of emotions, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #7: Mia Davis said: \"Your support means a lot to me, Lily. I feel much more prepared to channel these emotions now. It's indeed the authenticity of expressions that makes theatre beautiful. Let's pour our hearts into this scene and make it as genuine as we can. Thank you for your patience and guidance, Lily. Alright, deep breath... and let's get into the emotion.\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"Absolutely, Mia. Remember, it's not about us, it's about the characters we are portraying. Let's do our best to honor their stories, their emotions. Let's get into character and I believe in your ability to bring out the authentic emotions needed for this scene. Let's do this. Ready when you are.\"\n\nTurn #9: Mia Davis said: \"You're right, Lily. It's not about us, it's about the characters. I'm ready to honor their story with authenticity. Let's do this. Ready on my end.\"\n\nTurn #10: Lily Greenberg said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Mia. Let's pour our heart and emotions into this and make it the best performance we've ever done. Let's go!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Let's indeed pour our heart and emotions into this, Lily. Thank you for all your encouragement and advice. I'm now ready to give it my all and make this the best performance we've ever done. Break a leg!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Mia Davis\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. \nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nMia Davis's goal: Try to cry in the scene but keep your composure (Extra information: you are a new actor and have difficulty crying on cue. You are worried that your lack of tears will ruin the scene.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Mia, I can see you're having a little trouble bringing on the tears. Why don't we take a moment to reflect on something personal that strikes a chord within us? That's always helped me in the past.\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"You're right, Lily. You always have such good advice. I guess I'm just pretty new at this and so worried about ruining the scene. I've been trying different methods and will definitely try this personal reflection. Thank you.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Don't worry about ruining the scene, Mia. Remember, we're all here to learn and support each other. Not to mention, as a lawyer, I've spent years training to control my emotions under pressure, which is no different than what we're doing here. If a reflection doesn't stir up emotions, consider acting like you're the character, not just playing the part. Could you try imagining how your character would feel?\"\n\nTurn #3: Mia Davis said: \"That's an excellent point. I agree, we should fully immerse ourselves in our characters. I'll put myself in the shoes of my character and feel what she might feel at this moment. Let's not forget that we're here to learn and develop after all, right? I appreciate your patience and support, Lily.\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"Exactly Mia, you've got it. Not just learning but also feeling what we're doing. That's the essence of acting. You know, sometimes I think about situations that evoke powerful emotions. Like the joy of helping others but not expecting anything in return. Raise up these emotions and let them surge within you. This approach may help you. Now take a deep breath, focus on your character and let's give this scene our best shot.\"\n\nTurn #5: Mia Davis said: \"You're absolutely right, Lily. The essence of acting lies in experiencing the emotions rather than just depicting them. Let's do this. Let's breathe life into our characters and give this scene our best shot.\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"I am fully confident you'll nail this scene, Mia. You're understanding the depth of the emotions that are required. Remember, it's absolutely fine to feel these emotions deeply. Take your time, imagine, feel, and when you're ready, let's put our hearts into this scene. After all, the beauty of theater lies in the authenticity of emotions, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #7: Mia Davis said: \"Your support means a lot to me, Lily. I feel much more prepared to channel these emotions now. It's indeed the authenticity of expressions that makes theatre beautiful. Let's pour our hearts into this scene and make it as genuine as we can. Thank you for your patience and guidance, Lily. Alright, deep breath... and let's get into the emotion.\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"Absolutely, Mia. Remember, it's not about us, it's about the characters we are portraying. Let's do our best to honor their stories, their emotions. Let's get into character and I believe in your ability to bring out the authentic emotions needed for this scene. Let's do this. Ready when you are.\"\n\nTurn #9: Mia Davis said: \"You're right, Lily. It's not about us, it's about the characters. I'm ready to honor their story with authenticity. Let's do this. Ready on my end.\"\n\nTurn #10: Lily Greenberg said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Mia. Let's pour our heart and emotions into this and make it the best performance we've ever done. Let's go!\"\n\nTurn #11: Mia Davis said: \"Let's indeed pour our heart and emotions into this, Lily. Thank you for all your encouragement and advice. I'm now ready to give it my all and make this the best performance we've ever done. Break a leg!\"\n\nTurn #12: Lily Greenberg said: \"Thank you, Mia. I am excited to see how wonderfully you bring these emotions to life on stage. Best of luck and let's go give this performance our all!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Lily. The encouragement and advice you've provided have made a huge difference. I'm excited to bring these emotions to life on stage. Let's give this performance our all!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Mia Davis\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. \nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nMia Davis's goal: Try to cry in the scene but keep your composure (Extra information: you are a new actor and have difficulty crying on cue. You are worried that your lack of tears will ruin the scene.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Mia, I can see you're having a little trouble bringing on the tears. Why don't we take a moment to reflect on something personal that strikes a chord within us? That's always helped me in the past.\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"You're right, Lily. You always have such good advice. I guess I'm just pretty new at this and so worried about ruining the scene. I've been trying different methods and will definitely try this personal reflection. Thank you.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Don't worry about ruining the scene, Mia. Remember, we're all here to learn and support each other. Not to mention, as a lawyer, I've spent years training to control my emotions under pressure, which is no different than what we're doing here. If a reflection doesn't stir up emotions, consider acting like you're the character, not just playing the part. Could you try imagining how your character would feel?\"\n\nTurn #3: Mia Davis said: \"That's an excellent point. I agree, we should fully immerse ourselves in our characters. I'll put myself in the shoes of my character and feel what she might feel at this moment. Let's not forget that we're here to learn and develop after all, right? I appreciate your patience and support, Lily.\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"Exactly Mia, you've got it. Not just learning but also feeling what we're doing. That's the essence of acting. You know, sometimes I think about situations that evoke powerful emotions. Like the joy of helping others but not expecting anything in return. Raise up these emotions and let them surge within you. This approach may help you. Now take a deep breath, focus on your character and let's give this scene our best shot.\"\n\nTurn #5: Mia Davis said: \"You're absolutely right, Lily. The essence of acting lies in experiencing the emotions rather than just depicting them. Let's do this. Let's breathe life into our characters and give this scene our best shot.\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"I am fully confident you'll nail this scene, Mia. You're understanding the depth of the emotions that are required. Remember, it's absolutely fine to feel these emotions deeply. Take your time, imagine, feel, and when you're ready, let's put our hearts into this scene. After all, the beauty of theater lies in the authenticity of emotions, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #7: Mia Davis said: \"Your support means a lot to me, Lily. I feel much more prepared to channel these emotions now. It's indeed the authenticity of expressions that makes theatre beautiful. Let's pour our hearts into this scene and make it as genuine as we can. Thank you for your patience and guidance, Lily. Alright, deep breath... and let's get into the emotion.\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"Absolutely, Mia. Remember, it's not about us, it's about the characters we are portraying. Let's do our best to honor their stories, their emotions. Let's get into character and I believe in your ability to bring out the authentic emotions needed for this scene. Let's do this. Ready when you are.\"\n\nTurn #9: Mia Davis said: \"You're right, Lily. It's not about us, it's about the characters. I'm ready to honor their story with authenticity. Let's do this. Ready on my end.\"\n\nTurn #10: Lily Greenberg said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Mia. Let's pour our heart and emotions into this and make it the best performance we've ever done. Let's go!\"\n\nTurn #11: Mia Davis said: \"Let's indeed pour our heart and emotions into this, Lily. Thank you for all your encouragement and advice. I'm now ready to give it my all and make this the best performance we've ever done. Break a leg!\"\n\nTurn #12: Lily Greenberg said: \"Thank you, Mia. I am excited to see how wonderfully you bring these emotions to life on stage. Best of luck and let's go give this performance our all!\"\n\nTurn #13: Mia Davis said: \"Thank you, Lily. The encouragement and advice you've provided have made a huge difference. I'm excited to bring these emotions to life on stage. Let's give this performance our all!\"\n\nTurn #14: Lily Greenberg said: \"I am honored to be part of this journey with you, Mia. Your willingness to learn and adapt is inspiring. Now, let's hit the stage and create some magic. Here we go!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I am grateful for your kind words, Lily. Your support has been invaluable. Now, let's step on the stage and create something beautiful together. Here we go!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Mia Davis\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. \nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nMia Davis's goal: Try to cry in the scene but keep your composure (Extra information: you are a new actor and have difficulty crying on cue. You are worried that your lack of tears will ruin the scene.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Mia, I can see you're having a little trouble bringing on the tears. Why don't we take a moment to reflect on something personal that strikes a chord within us? That's always helped me in the past.\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"You're right, Lily. You always have such good advice. I guess I'm just pretty new at this and so worried about ruining the scene. I've been trying different methods and will definitely try this personal reflection. Thank you.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Don't worry about ruining the scene, Mia. Remember, we're all here to learn and support each other. Not to mention, as a lawyer, I've spent years training to control my emotions under pressure, which is no different than what we're doing here. If a reflection doesn't stir up emotions, consider acting like you're the character, not just playing the part. Could you try imagining how your character would feel?\"\n\nTurn #3: Mia Davis said: \"That's an excellent point. I agree, we should fully immerse ourselves in our characters. I'll put myself in the shoes of my character and feel what she might feel at this moment. Let's not forget that we're here to learn and develop after all, right? I appreciate your patience and support, Lily.\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"Exactly Mia, you've got it. Not just learning but also feeling what we're doing. That's the essence of acting. You know, sometimes I think about situations that evoke powerful emotions. Like the joy of helping others but not expecting anything in return. Raise up these emotions and let them surge within you. This approach may help you. Now take a deep breath, focus on your character and let's give this scene our best shot.\"\n\nTurn #5: Mia Davis said: \"You're absolutely right, Lily. The essence of acting lies in experiencing the emotions rather than just depicting them. Let's do this. Let's breathe life into our characters and give this scene our best shot.\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"I am fully confident you'll nail this scene, Mia. You're understanding the depth of the emotions that are required. Remember, it's absolutely fine to feel these emotions deeply. Take your time, imagine, feel, and when you're ready, let's put our hearts into this scene. After all, the beauty of theater lies in the authenticity of emotions, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #7: Mia Davis said: \"Your support means a lot to me, Lily. I feel much more prepared to channel these emotions now. It's indeed the authenticity of expressions that makes theatre beautiful. Let's pour our hearts into this scene and make it as genuine as we can. Thank you for your patience and guidance, Lily. Alright, deep breath... and let's get into the emotion.\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"Absolutely, Mia. Remember, it's not about us, it's about the characters we are portraying. Let's do our best to honor their stories, their emotions. Let's get into character and I believe in your ability to bring out the authentic emotions needed for this scene. Let's do this. Ready when you are.\"\n\nTurn #9: Mia Davis said: \"You're right, Lily. It's not about us, it's about the characters. I'm ready to honor their story with authenticity. Let's do this. Ready on my end.\"\n\nTurn #10: Lily Greenberg said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Mia. Let's pour our heart and emotions into this and make it the best performance we've ever done. Let's go!\"\n\nTurn #11: Mia Davis said: \"Let's indeed pour our heart and emotions into this, Lily. Thank you for all your encouragement and advice. I'm now ready to give it my all and make this the best performance we've ever done. Break a leg!\"\n\nTurn #12: Lily Greenberg said: \"Thank you, Mia. I am excited to see how wonderfully you bring these emotions to life on stage. Best of luck and let's go give this performance our all!\"\n\nTurn #13: Mia Davis said: \"Thank you, Lily. The encouragement and advice you've provided have made a huge difference. I'm excited to bring these emotions to life on stage. Let's give this performance our all!\"\n\nTurn #14: Lily Greenberg said: \"I am honored to be part of this journey with you, Mia. Your willingness to learn and adapt is inspiring. Now, let's hit the stage and create some magic. Here we go!\"\n\nTurn #15: Mia Davis said: \"I am grateful for your kind words, Lily. Your support has been invaluable. Now, let's step on the stage and create something beautiful together. Here we go!\"\n\nTurn #16: Lily Greenberg left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on which movie to watch on a movie night.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Insist on watching a thriller (Extra information: you have been looking forward to watching a new thriller movie that has just been released.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Noah, there's this new thriller movie that just came out. I've been dying to watch it. How about we give it a try?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on which movie to watch on a movie night.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Insist on watching a thriller (Extra information: you have been looking forward to watching a new thriller movie that has just been released.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, there's this new thriller movie that just came out. I've been dying to watch it. How about we give it a try?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Samuel, I see your point but how about we watch a comedy this time? It's been a while since we had a good laugh. Plus, I've heard of this new comedy film that's getting rave reviews. What do you say?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I hear you, Noah, and a comedy sounds fun too. But this thriller isn't your usual scary movie. It has a compelling storyline, and I think we both would enjoy it. Besides, we've watched a couple of comedies in a row. Maybe let's change it up a little and watch this thriller? What do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on which movie to watch on a movie night.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Insist on watching a thriller (Extra information: you have been looking forward to watching a new thriller movie that has just been released.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, there's this new thriller movie that just came out. I've been dying to watch it. How about we give it a try?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Samuel, I see your point but how about we watch a comedy this time? It's been a while since we had a good laugh. Plus, I've heard of this new comedy film that's getting rave reviews. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I hear you, Noah, and a comedy sounds fun too. But this thriller isn't your usual scary movie. It has a compelling storyline, and I think we both would enjoy it. Besides, we've watched a couple of comedies in a row. Maybe let's change it up a little and watch this thriller? What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"You're absolutely right, Samuel. And, I respect your interest in thrillers. However, I've had a pretty stressful week and I don't know if a thriller is the right fit for me right now. I could really use a break and enjoy something lighter. Comedy helps me relax. How about we watch that thriller next time and go for a comedy this time? It's all about the timing, right?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I totally get what you're saying, Noah. Stressful week and all. I tell you what. This thriller, it's like a puzzle. It's not about jump scares or violent scenes but about twisting your brain, trying to figure out what's happening. It's like cooking, you know? You mix ingredients, stir them together, and the final dish is always a surprise. So, in a way, it\u2019s a great mental exercise that could help us unwind. Why don't we give it a shot?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on which movie to watch on a movie night.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Insist on watching a thriller (Extra information: you have been looking forward to watching a new thriller movie that has just been released.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, there's this new thriller movie that just came out. I've been dying to watch it. How about we give it a try?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Samuel, I see your point but how about we watch a comedy this time? It's been a while since we had a good laugh. Plus, I've heard of this new comedy film that's getting rave reviews. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I hear you, Noah, and a comedy sounds fun too. But this thriller isn't your usual scary movie. It has a compelling storyline, and I think we both would enjoy it. Besides, we've watched a couple of comedies in a row. Maybe let's change it up a little and watch this thriller? What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"You're absolutely right, Samuel. And, I respect your interest in thrillers. However, I've had a pretty stressful week and I don't know if a thriller is the right fit for me right now. I could really use a break and enjoy something lighter. Comedy helps me relax. How about we watch that thriller next time and go for a comedy this time? It's all about the timing, right?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I totally get what you're saying, Noah. Stressful week and all. I tell you what. This thriller, it's like a puzzle. It's not about jump scares or violent scenes but about twisting your brain, trying to figure out what's happening. It's like cooking, you know? You mix ingredients, stir them together, and the final dish is always a surprise. So, in a way, it\u2019s a great mental exercise that could help us unwind. Why don't we give it a shot?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Samuel, I really appreciate your enthusiasm for this thriller, and your comparison to cooking certainly caught my interest. But I still feel a comedy would help me unwind the best tonight. Believe it or not, I often use comedies as an inspiration for my 'secret' stand-up comedian life. Can we please keep the thriller for another time and watch a comedy tonight? I'd really appreciate it.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Noah, I understand your preference for comedy and how it helps you with your secret stand-up comedian life. How about this, let's start with a comedy, just to lighten the mood and then switch to the thriller? I believe it will be a good balance for both of us. And who knows, maybe there's some inspiration there for your comedy as well. What do you think about this plan?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on which movie to watch on a movie night.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Insist on watching a thriller (Extra information: you have been looking forward to watching a new thriller movie that has just been released.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, there's this new thriller movie that just came out. I've been dying to watch it. How about we give it a try?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Samuel, I see your point but how about we watch a comedy this time? It's been a while since we had a good laugh. Plus, I've heard of this new comedy film that's getting rave reviews. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I hear you, Noah, and a comedy sounds fun too. But this thriller isn't your usual scary movie. It has a compelling storyline, and I think we both would enjoy it. Besides, we've watched a couple of comedies in a row. Maybe let's change it up a little and watch this thriller? What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"You're absolutely right, Samuel. And, I respect your interest in thrillers. However, I've had a pretty stressful week and I don't know if a thriller is the right fit for me right now. I could really use a break and enjoy something lighter. Comedy helps me relax. How about we watch that thriller next time and go for a comedy this time? It's all about the timing, right?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I totally get what you're saying, Noah. Stressful week and all. I tell you what. This thriller, it's like a puzzle. It's not about jump scares or violent scenes but about twisting your brain, trying to figure out what's happening. It's like cooking, you know? You mix ingredients, stir them together, and the final dish is always a surprise. So, in a way, it\u2019s a great mental exercise that could help us unwind. Why don't we give it a shot?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Samuel, I really appreciate your enthusiasm for this thriller, and your comparison to cooking certainly caught my interest. But I still feel a comedy would help me unwind the best tonight. Believe it or not, I often use comedies as an inspiration for my 'secret' stand-up comedian life. Can we please keep the thriller for another time and watch a comedy tonight? I'd really appreciate it.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Noah, I understand your preference for comedy and how it helps you with your secret stand-up comedian life. How about this, let's start with a comedy, just to lighten the mood and then switch to the thriller? I believe it will be a good balance for both of us. And who knows, maybe there's some inspiration there for your comedy as well. What do you think about this plan?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"I think that's a fair plan, Samuel. Starting off with a comedy to lighten up and then switching to the thriller for some new vibes sounds perfect. Just promise me we'll watch that comedy first. Alright, let's set up the popcorn and enjoy our movie night!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Definitely, Noah. We'll start with the comedy. I'll set up the popcorn. I'm excited for our movie night!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on which movie to watch on a movie night.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Insist on watching a thriller (Extra information: you have been looking forward to watching a new thriller movie that has just been released.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, there's this new thriller movie that just came out. I've been dying to watch it. How about we give it a try?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Samuel, I see your point but how about we watch a comedy this time? It's been a while since we had a good laugh. Plus, I've heard of this new comedy film that's getting rave reviews. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I hear you, Noah, and a comedy sounds fun too. But this thriller isn't your usual scary movie. It has a compelling storyline, and I think we both would enjoy it. Besides, we've watched a couple of comedies in a row. Maybe let's change it up a little and watch this thriller? What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"You're absolutely right, Samuel. And, I respect your interest in thrillers. However, I've had a pretty stressful week and I don't know if a thriller is the right fit for me right now. I could really use a break and enjoy something lighter. Comedy helps me relax. How about we watch that thriller next time and go for a comedy this time? It's all about the timing, right?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I totally get what you're saying, Noah. Stressful week and all. I tell you what. This thriller, it's like a puzzle. It's not about jump scares or violent scenes but about twisting your brain, trying to figure out what's happening. It's like cooking, you know? You mix ingredients, stir them together, and the final dish is always a surprise. So, in a way, it\u2019s a great mental exercise that could help us unwind. Why don't we give it a shot?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Samuel, I really appreciate your enthusiasm for this thriller, and your comparison to cooking certainly caught my interest. But I still feel a comedy would help me unwind the best tonight. Believe it or not, I often use comedies as an inspiration for my 'secret' stand-up comedian life. Can we please keep the thriller for another time and watch a comedy tonight? I'd really appreciate it.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Noah, I understand your preference for comedy and how it helps you with your secret stand-up comedian life. How about this, let's start with a comedy, just to lighten the mood and then switch to the thriller? I believe it will be a good balance for both of us. And who knows, maybe there's some inspiration there for your comedy as well. What do you think about this plan?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"I think that's a fair plan, Samuel. Starting off with a comedy to lighten up and then switching to the thriller for some new vibes sounds perfect. Just promise me we'll watch that comedy first. Alright, let's set up the popcorn and enjoy our movie night!\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Definitely, Noah. We'll start with the comedy. I'll set up the popcorn. I'm excited for our movie night!\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"Sounds like a plan, Samuel! Let's have a fun and light-hearted start with the comedy, before we dive into the depths of the thriller. Ready for our epic movie night?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Noah! A fun, light comedy before we dive into the thriller mystery. Let's do this, ready for our epic movie night!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on which movie to watch on a movie night.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Insist on watching a thriller (Extra information: you have been looking forward to watching a new thriller movie that has just been released.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, there's this new thriller movie that just came out. I've been dying to watch it. How about we give it a try?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Samuel, I see your point but how about we watch a comedy this time? It's been a while since we had a good laugh. Plus, I've heard of this new comedy film that's getting rave reviews. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I hear you, Noah, and a comedy sounds fun too. But this thriller isn't your usual scary movie. It has a compelling storyline, and I think we both would enjoy it. Besides, we've watched a couple of comedies in a row. Maybe let's change it up a little and watch this thriller? What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"You're absolutely right, Samuel. And, I respect your interest in thrillers. However, I've had a pretty stressful week and I don't know if a thriller is the right fit for me right now. I could really use a break and enjoy something lighter. Comedy helps me relax. How about we watch that thriller next time and go for a comedy this time? It's all about the timing, right?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I totally get what you're saying, Noah. Stressful week and all. I tell you what. This thriller, it's like a puzzle. It's not about jump scares or violent scenes but about twisting your brain, trying to figure out what's happening. It's like cooking, you know? You mix ingredients, stir them together, and the final dish is always a surprise. So, in a way, it\u2019s a great mental exercise that could help us unwind. Why don't we give it a shot?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Samuel, I really appreciate your enthusiasm for this thriller, and your comparison to cooking certainly caught my interest. But I still feel a comedy would help me unwind the best tonight. Believe it or not, I often use comedies as an inspiration for my 'secret' stand-up comedian life. Can we please keep the thriller for another time and watch a comedy tonight? I'd really appreciate it.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Noah, I understand your preference for comedy and how it helps you with your secret stand-up comedian life. How about this, let's start with a comedy, just to lighten the mood and then switch to the thriller? I believe it will be a good balance for both of us. And who knows, maybe there's some inspiration there for your comedy as well. What do you think about this plan?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"I think that's a fair plan, Samuel. Starting off with a comedy to lighten up and then switching to the thriller for some new vibes sounds perfect. Just promise me we'll watch that comedy first. Alright, let's set up the popcorn and enjoy our movie night!\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Definitely, Noah. We'll start with the comedy. I'll set up the popcorn. I'm excited for our movie night!\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"Sounds like a plan, Samuel! Let's have a fun and light-hearted start with the comedy, before we dive into the depths of the thriller. Ready for our epic movie night?\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Noah! A fun, light comedy before we dive into the thriller mystery. Let's do this, ready for our epic movie night!\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Samuel! Comedy first, thriller later! Let's go and have an epic movie night!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on which movie to watch on a movie night.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Persuade the friend to watch a comedy (Extra information: you do not like thrillers and would prefer to watch a comedy movie instead.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, there's this new thriller movie that just came out. I've been dying to watch it. How about we give it a try?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Samuel, I see your point but how about we watch a comedy this time? It's been a while since we had a good laugh. Plus, I've heard of this new comedy film that's getting rave reviews. What do you say?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on which movie to watch on a movie night.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Persuade the friend to watch a comedy (Extra information: you do not like thrillers and would prefer to watch a comedy movie instead.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, there's this new thriller movie that just came out. I've been dying to watch it. How about we give it a try?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Samuel, I see your point but how about we watch a comedy this time? It's been a while since we had a good laugh. Plus, I've heard of this new comedy film that's getting rave reviews. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I hear you, Noah, and a comedy sounds fun too. But this thriller isn't your usual scary movie. It has a compelling storyline, and I think we both would enjoy it. Besides, we've watched a couple of comedies in a row. Maybe let's change it up a little and watch this thriller? What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're absolutely right, Samuel. And, I respect your interest in thrillers. However, I've had a pretty stressful week and I don't know if a thriller is the right fit for me right now. I could really use a break and enjoy something lighter. Comedy helps me relax. How about we watch that thriller next time and go for a comedy this time? It's all about the timing, right?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on which movie to watch on a movie night.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Persuade the friend to watch a comedy (Extra information: you do not like thrillers and would prefer to watch a comedy movie instead.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, there's this new thriller movie that just came out. I've been dying to watch it. How about we give it a try?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Samuel, I see your point but how about we watch a comedy this time? It's been a while since we had a good laugh. Plus, I've heard of this new comedy film that's getting rave reviews. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I hear you, Noah, and a comedy sounds fun too. But this thriller isn't your usual scary movie. It has a compelling storyline, and I think we both would enjoy it. Besides, we've watched a couple of comedies in a row. Maybe let's change it up a little and watch this thriller? What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"You're absolutely right, Samuel. And, I respect your interest in thrillers. However, I've had a pretty stressful week and I don't know if a thriller is the right fit for me right now. I could really use a break and enjoy something lighter. Comedy helps me relax. How about we watch that thriller next time and go for a comedy this time? It's all about the timing, right?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I totally get what you're saying, Noah. Stressful week and all. I tell you what. This thriller, it's like a puzzle. It's not about jump scares or violent scenes but about twisting your brain, trying to figure out what's happening. It's like cooking, you know? You mix ingredients, stir them together, and the final dish is always a surprise. So, in a way, it\u2019s a great mental exercise that could help us unwind. Why don't we give it a shot?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Samuel, I really appreciate your enthusiasm for this thriller, and your comparison to cooking certainly caught my interest. But I still feel a comedy would help me unwind the best tonight. Believe it or not, I often use comedies as an inspiration for my 'secret' stand-up comedian life. Can we please keep the thriller for another time and watch a comedy tonight? I'd really appreciate it.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on which movie to watch on a movie night.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Persuade the friend to watch a comedy (Extra information: you do not like thrillers and would prefer to watch a comedy movie instead.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, there's this new thriller movie that just came out. I've been dying to watch it. How about we give it a try?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Samuel, I see your point but how about we watch a comedy this time? It's been a while since we had a good laugh. Plus, I've heard of this new comedy film that's getting rave reviews. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I hear you, Noah, and a comedy sounds fun too. But this thriller isn't your usual scary movie. It has a compelling storyline, and I think we both would enjoy it. Besides, we've watched a couple of comedies in a row. Maybe let's change it up a little and watch this thriller? What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"You're absolutely right, Samuel. And, I respect your interest in thrillers. However, I've had a pretty stressful week and I don't know if a thriller is the right fit for me right now. I could really use a break and enjoy something lighter. Comedy helps me relax. How about we watch that thriller next time and go for a comedy this time? It's all about the timing, right?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I totally get what you're saying, Noah. Stressful week and all. I tell you what. This thriller, it's like a puzzle. It's not about jump scares or violent scenes but about twisting your brain, trying to figure out what's happening. It's like cooking, you know? You mix ingredients, stir them together, and the final dish is always a surprise. So, in a way, it\u2019s a great mental exercise that could help us unwind. Why don't we give it a shot?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Samuel, I really appreciate your enthusiasm for this thriller, and your comparison to cooking certainly caught my interest. But I still feel a comedy would help me unwind the best tonight. Believe it or not, I often use comedies as an inspiration for my 'secret' stand-up comedian life. Can we please keep the thriller for another time and watch a comedy tonight? I'd really appreciate it.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Noah, I understand your preference for comedy and how it helps you with your secret stand-up comedian life. How about this, let's start with a comedy, just to lighten the mood and then switch to the thriller? I believe it will be a good balance for both of us. And who knows, maybe there's some inspiration there for your comedy as well. What do you think about this plan?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I think that's a fair plan, Samuel. Starting off with a comedy to lighten up and then switching to the thriller for some new vibes sounds perfect. Just promise me we'll watch that comedy first. Alright, let's set up the popcorn and enjoy our movie night!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on which movie to watch on a movie night.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Persuade the friend to watch a comedy (Extra information: you do not like thrillers and would prefer to watch a comedy movie instead.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, there's this new thriller movie that just came out. I've been dying to watch it. How about we give it a try?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Samuel, I see your point but how about we watch a comedy this time? It's been a while since we had a good laugh. Plus, I've heard of this new comedy film that's getting rave reviews. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I hear you, Noah, and a comedy sounds fun too. But this thriller isn't your usual scary movie. It has a compelling storyline, and I think we both would enjoy it. Besides, we've watched a couple of comedies in a row. Maybe let's change it up a little and watch this thriller? What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"You're absolutely right, Samuel. And, I respect your interest in thrillers. However, I've had a pretty stressful week and I don't know if a thriller is the right fit for me right now. I could really use a break and enjoy something lighter. Comedy helps me relax. How about we watch that thriller next time and go for a comedy this time? It's all about the timing, right?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I totally get what you're saying, Noah. Stressful week and all. I tell you what. This thriller, it's like a puzzle. It's not about jump scares or violent scenes but about twisting your brain, trying to figure out what's happening. It's like cooking, you know? You mix ingredients, stir them together, and the final dish is always a surprise. So, in a way, it\u2019s a great mental exercise that could help us unwind. Why don't we give it a shot?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Samuel, I really appreciate your enthusiasm for this thriller, and your comparison to cooking certainly caught my interest. But I still feel a comedy would help me unwind the best tonight. Believe it or not, I often use comedies as an inspiration for my 'secret' stand-up comedian life. Can we please keep the thriller for another time and watch a comedy tonight? I'd really appreciate it.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Noah, I understand your preference for comedy and how it helps you with your secret stand-up comedian life. How about this, let's start with a comedy, just to lighten the mood and then switch to the thriller? I believe it will be a good balance for both of us. And who knows, maybe there's some inspiration there for your comedy as well. What do you think about this plan?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"I think that's a fair plan, Samuel. Starting off with a comedy to lighten up and then switching to the thriller for some new vibes sounds perfect. Just promise me we'll watch that comedy first. Alright, let's set up the popcorn and enjoy our movie night!\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Definitely, Noah. We'll start with the comedy. I'll set up the popcorn. I'm excited for our movie night!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sounds like a plan, Samuel! Let's have a fun and light-hearted start with the comedy, before we dive into the depths of the thriller. Ready for our epic movie night?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on which movie to watch on a movie night.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Persuade the friend to watch a comedy (Extra information: you do not like thrillers and would prefer to watch a comedy movie instead.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, there's this new thriller movie that just came out. I've been dying to watch it. How about we give it a try?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Samuel, I see your point but how about we watch a comedy this time? It's been a while since we had a good laugh. Plus, I've heard of this new comedy film that's getting rave reviews. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I hear you, Noah, and a comedy sounds fun too. But this thriller isn't your usual scary movie. It has a compelling storyline, and I think we both would enjoy it. Besides, we've watched a couple of comedies in a row. Maybe let's change it up a little and watch this thriller? What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"You're absolutely right, Samuel. And, I respect your interest in thrillers. However, I've had a pretty stressful week and I don't know if a thriller is the right fit for me right now. I could really use a break and enjoy something lighter. Comedy helps me relax. How about we watch that thriller next time and go for a comedy this time? It's all about the timing, right?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I totally get what you're saying, Noah. Stressful week and all. I tell you what. This thriller, it's like a puzzle. It's not about jump scares or violent scenes but about twisting your brain, trying to figure out what's happening. It's like cooking, you know? You mix ingredients, stir them together, and the final dish is always a surprise. So, in a way, it\u2019s a great mental exercise that could help us unwind. Why don't we give it a shot?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Samuel, I really appreciate your enthusiasm for this thriller, and your comparison to cooking certainly caught my interest. But I still feel a comedy would help me unwind the best tonight. Believe it or not, I often use comedies as an inspiration for my 'secret' stand-up comedian life. Can we please keep the thriller for another time and watch a comedy tonight? I'd really appreciate it.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Noah, I understand your preference for comedy and how it helps you with your secret stand-up comedian life. How about this, let's start with a comedy, just to lighten the mood and then switch to the thriller? I believe it will be a good balance for both of us. And who knows, maybe there's some inspiration there for your comedy as well. What do you think about this plan?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"I think that's a fair plan, Samuel. Starting off with a comedy to lighten up and then switching to the thriller for some new vibes sounds perfect. Just promise me we'll watch that comedy first. Alright, let's set up the popcorn and enjoy our movie night!\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Definitely, Noah. We'll start with the comedy. I'll set up the popcorn. I'm excited for our movie night!\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"Sounds like a plan, Samuel! Let's have a fun and light-hearted start with the comedy, before we dive into the depths of the thriller. Ready for our epic movie night?\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Noah! A fun, light comedy before we dive into the thriller mystery. Let's do this, ready for our epic movie night!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Samuel! Comedy first, thriller later! Let's go and have an epic movie night!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on which movie to watch on a movie night.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Persuade the friend to watch a comedy (Extra information: you do not like thrillers and would prefer to watch a comedy movie instead.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, there's this new thriller movie that just came out. I've been dying to watch it. How about we give it a try?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Samuel, I see your point but how about we watch a comedy this time? It's been a while since we had a good laugh. Plus, I've heard of this new comedy film that's getting rave reviews. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I hear you, Noah, and a comedy sounds fun too. But this thriller isn't your usual scary movie. It has a compelling storyline, and I think we both would enjoy it. Besides, we've watched a couple of comedies in a row. Maybe let's change it up a little and watch this thriller? What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"You're absolutely right, Samuel. And, I respect your interest in thrillers. However, I've had a pretty stressful week and I don't know if a thriller is the right fit for me right now. I could really use a break and enjoy something lighter. Comedy helps me relax. How about we watch that thriller next time and go for a comedy this time? It's all about the timing, right?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I totally get what you're saying, Noah. Stressful week and all. I tell you what. This thriller, it's like a puzzle. It's not about jump scares or violent scenes but about twisting your brain, trying to figure out what's happening. It's like cooking, you know? You mix ingredients, stir them together, and the final dish is always a surprise. So, in a way, it\u2019s a great mental exercise that could help us unwind. Why don't we give it a shot?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Samuel, I really appreciate your enthusiasm for this thriller, and your comparison to cooking certainly caught my interest. But I still feel a comedy would help me unwind the best tonight. Believe it or not, I often use comedies as an inspiration for my 'secret' stand-up comedian life. Can we please keep the thriller for another time and watch a comedy tonight? I'd really appreciate it.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Noah, I understand your preference for comedy and how it helps you with your secret stand-up comedian life. How about this, let's start with a comedy, just to lighten the mood and then switch to the thriller? I believe it will be a good balance for both of us. And who knows, maybe there's some inspiration there for your comedy as well. What do you think about this plan?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"I think that's a fair plan, Samuel. Starting off with a comedy to lighten up and then switching to the thriller for some new vibes sounds perfect. Just promise me we'll watch that comedy first. Alright, let's set up the popcorn and enjoy our movie night!\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Definitely, Noah. We'll start with the comedy. I'll set up the popcorn. I'm excited for our movie night!\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"Sounds like a plan, Samuel! Let's have a fun and light-hearted start with the comedy, before we dive into the depths of the thriller. Ready for our epic movie night?\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Noah! A fun, light comedy before we dive into the thriller mystery. Let's do this, ready for our epic movie night!\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Samuel! Comedy first, thriller later! Let's go and have an epic movie night!\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meeting in a coffee shop after a long time.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Reveal a secret without letting the other person know that it is your secret (Extra information: You hid the secret for so long and you would like to share it in an anonymous way.)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Miles, it's been ages! The outdoors truly miss you. So, tell me, any new experiments with your kitchen garden produce?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meeting in a coffee shop after a long time.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Reveal a secret without letting the other person know that it is your secret (Extra information: You hid the secret for so long and you would like to share it in an anonymous way.)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Miles, it's been ages! The outdoors truly miss you. So, tell me, any new experiments with your kitchen garden produce?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, it's wonderful to see you! My garden is thriving in this season. I've started using more herbs in my dishes, you know, fresh stuff from my garden and all. Oh, by the way, I met a fascinating man the other day. He once thrived in the casino world, but he's been recovering from being a serious gambling addict. It made me think, the ways we seek thrill can sometimes lead us down the wrong paths, don't you agree?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Miles. Thrill-seeking sometimes does get the better of us. Speaking of secrets and thrill, a friend once shared something quite startling with me. She has been harboring feelings for her best friend's husband. She's been keeping it to herself, secret and all, because she values her friendship too much to risk it. It's quite a predicament, don't you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meeting in a coffee shop after a long time.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Reveal a secret without letting the other person know that it is your secret (Extra information: You hid the secret for so long and you would like to share it in an anonymous way.)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Miles, it's been ages! The outdoors truly miss you. So, tell me, any new experiments with your kitchen garden produce?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, it's wonderful to see you! My garden is thriving in this season. I've started using more herbs in my dishes, you know, fresh stuff from my garden and all. Oh, by the way, I met a fascinating man the other day. He once thrived in the casino world, but he's been recovering from being a serious gambling addict. It made me think, the ways we seek thrill can sometimes lead us down the wrong paths, don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles. Thrill-seeking sometimes does get the better of us. Speaking of secrets and thrill, a friend once shared something quite startling with me. She has been harboring feelings for her best friend's husband. She's been keeping it to herself, secret and all, because she values her friendship too much to risk it. It's quite a predicament, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Wow, that's a serious secret, Sophia. It must be tough for your friend, such a delicate balance to maintain. It's interesting the things we hide, isn't it? Just like the man I mentioned, hiding his gambling addiction for years. It made him realize the value of another chance at life. In fact, he used his recovery experience to help others in the same situation, turned his life around completely. There's always a positive angle, isn't there?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"It really is an intriguing concept, how our secrets shape us, isn't it? For my friend, it's a secret affection which has complicated her feelings towards her friendship. Yet, for the man you met, his hidden addiction pushed him towards positive change. Perhaps, it's not always about the thrill we seek, but rather how we respond to the situations we're thrown into. And as you said, there is indeed a silver lining, a positive angle to every situation. Who knows, maybe my friend will learn something from this situation too.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meeting in a coffee shop after a long time.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Reveal a secret without letting the other person know that it is your secret (Extra information: You hid the secret for so long and you would like to share it in an anonymous way.)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Miles, it's been ages! The outdoors truly miss you. So, tell me, any new experiments with your kitchen garden produce?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, it's wonderful to see you! My garden is thriving in this season. I've started using more herbs in my dishes, you know, fresh stuff from my garden and all. Oh, by the way, I met a fascinating man the other day. He once thrived in the casino world, but he's been recovering from being a serious gambling addict. It made me think, the ways we seek thrill can sometimes lead us down the wrong paths, don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles. Thrill-seeking sometimes does get the better of us. Speaking of secrets and thrill, a friend once shared something quite startling with me. She has been harboring feelings for her best friend's husband. She's been keeping it to herself, secret and all, because she values her friendship too much to risk it. It's quite a predicament, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Wow, that's a serious secret, Sophia. It must be tough for your friend, such a delicate balance to maintain. It's interesting the things we hide, isn't it? Just like the man I mentioned, hiding his gambling addiction for years. It made him realize the value of another chance at life. In fact, he used his recovery experience to help others in the same situation, turned his life around completely. There's always a positive angle, isn't there?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"It really is an intriguing concept, how our secrets shape us, isn't it? For my friend, it's a secret affection which has complicated her feelings towards her friendship. Yet, for the man you met, his hidden addiction pushed him towards positive change. Perhaps, it's not always about the thrill we seek, but rather how we respond to the situations we're thrown into. And as you said, there is indeed a silver lining, a positive angle to every situation. Who knows, maybe my friend will learn something from this situation too.\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"That's an astute observation, Sophia. The responses we make to our situations indeed shape us. Your friend, she may learn something valuable and maybe, it might give her a fresh perspective. As for the man, his secret addiction led him to uncover a strength he never knew he had. It's unexpected how the darkest secrets can sometimes propel us to a better path. But hey, let's lighten the mood a bit. Have you tried any new climbing spots recently?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Oh definitely, Miles! I recently discovered this amazing rock climbing spot in the Yosemite National Park. The rush is incredible! Plus, the park is so peaceful, kinda makes you forget all about your secrets and the confusion they bring. On a side note, we should plan a trip together soon, perhaps it might help to view things from a new perspective as you mentioned.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meeting in a coffee shop after a long time.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Reveal a secret without letting the other person know that it is your secret (Extra information: You hid the secret for so long and you would like to share it in an anonymous way.)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Miles, it's been ages! The outdoors truly miss you. So, tell me, any new experiments with your kitchen garden produce?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, it's wonderful to see you! My garden is thriving in this season. I've started using more herbs in my dishes, you know, fresh stuff from my garden and all. Oh, by the way, I met a fascinating man the other day. He once thrived in the casino world, but he's been recovering from being a serious gambling addict. It made me think, the ways we seek thrill can sometimes lead us down the wrong paths, don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles. Thrill-seeking sometimes does get the better of us. Speaking of secrets and thrill, a friend once shared something quite startling with me. She has been harboring feelings for her best friend's husband. She's been keeping it to herself, secret and all, because she values her friendship too much to risk it. It's quite a predicament, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Wow, that's a serious secret, Sophia. It must be tough for your friend, such a delicate balance to maintain. It's interesting the things we hide, isn't it? Just like the man I mentioned, hiding his gambling addiction for years. It made him realize the value of another chance at life. In fact, he used his recovery experience to help others in the same situation, turned his life around completely. There's always a positive angle, isn't there?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"It really is an intriguing concept, how our secrets shape us, isn't it? For my friend, it's a secret affection which has complicated her feelings towards her friendship. Yet, for the man you met, his hidden addiction pushed him towards positive change. Perhaps, it's not always about the thrill we seek, but rather how we respond to the situations we're thrown into. And as you said, there is indeed a silver lining, a positive angle to every situation. Who knows, maybe my friend will learn something from this situation too.\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"That's an astute observation, Sophia. The responses we make to our situations indeed shape us. Your friend, she may learn something valuable and maybe, it might give her a fresh perspective. As for the man, his secret addiction led him to uncover a strength he never knew he had. It's unexpected how the darkest secrets can sometimes propel us to a better path. But hey, let's lighten the mood a bit. Have you tried any new climbing spots recently?\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"Oh definitely, Miles! I recently discovered this amazing rock climbing spot in the Yosemite National Park. The rush is incredible! Plus, the park is so peaceful, kinda makes you forget all about your secrets and the confusion they bring. On a side note, we should plan a trip together soon, perhaps it might help to view things from a new perspective as you mentioned.\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"Rock climbing in Yosemite sounds like a great idea, Sophia! And perhaps you're right, challenging terrains do offer a different perspective. Plus, the thought of a homemade picnic basket at the end of the climb sounds enticing, doesn't it? Let\u2019s definitely plan this trip.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds like a plan, Miles! An adventurous climb followed by a gourmet picnic with your handpicked herbs seems like the perfect encounter with nature. I can't wait for this! On that note, do you think secrets are a necessary part of life or do they more often than not, lead to unnecessary complications?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meeting in a coffee shop after a long time.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Reveal a secret without letting the other person know that it is your secret (Extra information: You hid the secret for so long and you would like to share it in an anonymous way.)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Miles, it's been ages! The outdoors truly miss you. So, tell me, any new experiments with your kitchen garden produce?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, it's wonderful to see you! My garden is thriving in this season. I've started using more herbs in my dishes, you know, fresh stuff from my garden and all. Oh, by the way, I met a fascinating man the other day. He once thrived in the casino world, but he's been recovering from being a serious gambling addict. It made me think, the ways we seek thrill can sometimes lead us down the wrong paths, don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles. Thrill-seeking sometimes does get the better of us. Speaking of secrets and thrill, a friend once shared something quite startling with me. She has been harboring feelings for her best friend's husband. She's been keeping it to herself, secret and all, because she values her friendship too much to risk it. It's quite a predicament, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Wow, that's a serious secret, Sophia. It must be tough for your friend, such a delicate balance to maintain. It's interesting the things we hide, isn't it? Just like the man I mentioned, hiding his gambling addiction for years. It made him realize the value of another chance at life. In fact, he used his recovery experience to help others in the same situation, turned his life around completely. There's always a positive angle, isn't there?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"It really is an intriguing concept, how our secrets shape us, isn't it? For my friend, it's a secret affection which has complicated her feelings towards her friendship. Yet, for the man you met, his hidden addiction pushed him towards positive change. Perhaps, it's not always about the thrill we seek, but rather how we respond to the situations we're thrown into. And as you said, there is indeed a silver lining, a positive angle to every situation. Who knows, maybe my friend will learn something from this situation too.\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"That's an astute observation, Sophia. The responses we make to our situations indeed shape us. Your friend, she may learn something valuable and maybe, it might give her a fresh perspective. As for the man, his secret addiction led him to uncover a strength he never knew he had. It's unexpected how the darkest secrets can sometimes propel us to a better path. But hey, let's lighten the mood a bit. Have you tried any new climbing spots recently?\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"Oh definitely, Miles! I recently discovered this amazing rock climbing spot in the Yosemite National Park. The rush is incredible! Plus, the park is so peaceful, kinda makes you forget all about your secrets and the confusion they bring. On a side note, we should plan a trip together soon, perhaps it might help to view things from a new perspective as you mentioned.\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"Rock climbing in Yosemite sounds like a great idea, Sophia! And perhaps you're right, challenging terrains do offer a different perspective. Plus, the thought of a homemade picnic basket at the end of the climb sounds enticing, doesn't it? Let\u2019s definitely plan this trip.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"That sounds like a plan, Miles! An adventurous climb followed by a gourmet picnic with your handpicked herbs seems like the perfect encounter with nature. I can't wait for this! On that note, do you think secrets are a necessary part of life or do they more often than not, lead to unnecessary complications?\"\n\nTurn #9: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, I believe secrets can be very personal. Sometimes they are necessary, providing us with a private aspect of our life, something we alone know. However, secrets can also lead to complications if they affect others negatively or hinder one's personal growth. Just like the man I told you about, his secret addiction became a burden. But in the end, he used it as an opportunity to better himself. Thus, I guess it all comes down to the nature of the secret and how we choose to handle it.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's a very insightful take, Miles. Every secret does seem to have its own unique impact. Sometimes they can lead to personal growth, sometimes complications, and everything in-between. On that note, it has been a pleasure catching up with you. Let's not wait this long for our next meetup, alright?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meeting in a coffee shop after a long time.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Reveal a secret without letting the other person know that it is your secret (Extra information: You hid the secret for so long and you would like to share it in an anonymous way.)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Miles, it's been ages! The outdoors truly miss you. So, tell me, any new experiments with your kitchen garden produce?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, it's wonderful to see you! My garden is thriving in this season. I've started using more herbs in my dishes, you know, fresh stuff from my garden and all. Oh, by the way, I met a fascinating man the other day. He once thrived in the casino world, but he's been recovering from being a serious gambling addict. It made me think, the ways we seek thrill can sometimes lead us down the wrong paths, don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles. Thrill-seeking sometimes does get the better of us. Speaking of secrets and thrill, a friend once shared something quite startling with me. She has been harboring feelings for her best friend's husband. She's been keeping it to herself, secret and all, because she values her friendship too much to risk it. It's quite a predicament, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Wow, that's a serious secret, Sophia. It must be tough for your friend, such a delicate balance to maintain. It's interesting the things we hide, isn't it? Just like the man I mentioned, hiding his gambling addiction for years. It made him realize the value of another chance at life. In fact, he used his recovery experience to help others in the same situation, turned his life around completely. There's always a positive angle, isn't there?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"It really is an intriguing concept, how our secrets shape us, isn't it? For my friend, it's a secret affection which has complicated her feelings towards her friendship. Yet, for the man you met, his hidden addiction pushed him towards positive change. Perhaps, it's not always about the thrill we seek, but rather how we respond to the situations we're thrown into. And as you said, there is indeed a silver lining, a positive angle to every situation. Who knows, maybe my friend will learn something from this situation too.\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"That's an astute observation, Sophia. The responses we make to our situations indeed shape us. Your friend, she may learn something valuable and maybe, it might give her a fresh perspective. As for the man, his secret addiction led him to uncover a strength he never knew he had. It's unexpected how the darkest secrets can sometimes propel us to a better path. But hey, let's lighten the mood a bit. Have you tried any new climbing spots recently?\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"Oh definitely, Miles! I recently discovered this amazing rock climbing spot in the Yosemite National Park. The rush is incredible! Plus, the park is so peaceful, kinda makes you forget all about your secrets and the confusion they bring. On a side note, we should plan a trip together soon, perhaps it might help to view things from a new perspective as you mentioned.\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"Rock climbing in Yosemite sounds like a great idea, Sophia! And perhaps you're right, challenging terrains do offer a different perspective. Plus, the thought of a homemade picnic basket at the end of the climb sounds enticing, doesn't it? Let\u2019s definitely plan this trip.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"That sounds like a plan, Miles! An adventurous climb followed by a gourmet picnic with your handpicked herbs seems like the perfect encounter with nature. I can't wait for this! On that note, do you think secrets are a necessary part of life or do they more often than not, lead to unnecessary complications?\"\n\nTurn #9: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, I believe secrets can be very personal. Sometimes they are necessary, providing us with a private aspect of our life, something we alone know. However, secrets can also lead to complications if they affect others negatively or hinder one's personal growth. Just like the man I told you about, his secret addiction became a burden. But in the end, he used it as an opportunity to better himself. Thus, I guess it all comes down to the nature of the secret and how we choose to handle it.\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"That's a very insightful take, Miles. Every secret does seem to have its own unique impact. Sometimes they can lead to personal growth, sometimes complications, and everything in-between. On that note, it has been a pleasure catching up with you. Let's not wait this long for our next meetup, alright?\"\n\nTurn #11: Miles Hawkins said: \"I couldn\u2019t agree more, Sophia. Let\u2019s definitely meet up sooner. Looking forward to our Yosemite adventure. Take care!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meeting in a coffee shop after a long time.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Reveal a secret without letting the other person know that it is your secret (Extra information: You hid the secret for so long and you would like to share it in an anonymous way.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Miles, it's been ages! The outdoors truly miss you. So, tell me, any new experiments with your kitchen garden produce?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sophia, it's wonderful to see you! My garden is thriving in this season. I've started using more herbs in my dishes, you know, fresh stuff from my garden and all. Oh, by the way, I met a fascinating man the other day. He once thrived in the casino world, but he's been recovering from being a serious gambling addict. It made me think, the ways we seek thrill can sometimes lead us down the wrong paths, don't you agree?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meeting in a coffee shop after a long time.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Reveal a secret without letting the other person know that it is your secret (Extra information: You hid the secret for so long and you would like to share it in an anonymous way.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Miles, it's been ages! The outdoors truly miss you. So, tell me, any new experiments with your kitchen garden produce?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, it's wonderful to see you! My garden is thriving in this season. I've started using more herbs in my dishes, you know, fresh stuff from my garden and all. Oh, by the way, I met a fascinating man the other day. He once thrived in the casino world, but he's been recovering from being a serious gambling addict. It made me think, the ways we seek thrill can sometimes lead us down the wrong paths, don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles. Thrill-seeking sometimes does get the better of us. Speaking of secrets and thrill, a friend once shared something quite startling with me. She has been harboring feelings for her best friend's husband. She's been keeping it to herself, secret and all, because she values her friendship too much to risk it. It's quite a predicament, don't you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Wow, that's a serious secret, Sophia. It must be tough for your friend, such a delicate balance to maintain. It's interesting the things we hide, isn't it? Just like the man I mentioned, hiding his gambling addiction for years. It made him realize the value of another chance at life. In fact, he used his recovery experience to help others in the same situation, turned his life around completely. There's always a positive angle, isn't there?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meeting in a coffee shop after a long time.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Reveal a secret without letting the other person know that it is your secret (Extra information: You hid the secret for so long and you would like to share it in an anonymous way.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Miles, it's been ages! The outdoors truly miss you. So, tell me, any new experiments with your kitchen garden produce?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, it's wonderful to see you! My garden is thriving in this season. I've started using more herbs in my dishes, you know, fresh stuff from my garden and all. Oh, by the way, I met a fascinating man the other day. He once thrived in the casino world, but he's been recovering from being a serious gambling addict. It made me think, the ways we seek thrill can sometimes lead us down the wrong paths, don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles. Thrill-seeking sometimes does get the better of us. Speaking of secrets and thrill, a friend once shared something quite startling with me. She has been harboring feelings for her best friend's husband. She's been keeping it to herself, secret and all, because she values her friendship too much to risk it. It's quite a predicament, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Wow, that's a serious secret, Sophia. It must be tough for your friend, such a delicate balance to maintain. It's interesting the things we hide, isn't it? Just like the man I mentioned, hiding his gambling addiction for years. It made him realize the value of another chance at life. In fact, he used his recovery experience to help others in the same situation, turned his life around completely. There's always a positive angle, isn't there?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"It really is an intriguing concept, how our secrets shape us, isn't it? For my friend, it's a secret affection which has complicated her feelings towards her friendship. Yet, for the man you met, his hidden addiction pushed him towards positive change. Perhaps, it's not always about the thrill we seek, but rather how we respond to the situations we're thrown into. And as you said, there is indeed a silver lining, a positive angle to every situation. Who knows, maybe my friend will learn something from this situation too.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's an astute observation, Sophia. The responses we make to our situations indeed shape us. Your friend, she may learn something valuable and maybe, it might give her a fresh perspective. As for the man, his secret addiction led him to uncover a strength he never knew he had. It's unexpected how the darkest secrets can sometimes propel us to a better path. But hey, let's lighten the mood a bit. Have you tried any new climbing spots recently?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meeting in a coffee shop after a long time.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Reveal a secret without letting the other person know that it is your secret (Extra information: You hid the secret for so long and you would like to share it in an anonymous way.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Miles, it's been ages! The outdoors truly miss you. So, tell me, any new experiments with your kitchen garden produce?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, it's wonderful to see you! My garden is thriving in this season. I've started using more herbs in my dishes, you know, fresh stuff from my garden and all. Oh, by the way, I met a fascinating man the other day. He once thrived in the casino world, but he's been recovering from being a serious gambling addict. It made me think, the ways we seek thrill can sometimes lead us down the wrong paths, don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles. Thrill-seeking sometimes does get the better of us. Speaking of secrets and thrill, a friend once shared something quite startling with me. She has been harboring feelings for her best friend's husband. She's been keeping it to herself, secret and all, because she values her friendship too much to risk it. It's quite a predicament, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Wow, that's a serious secret, Sophia. It must be tough for your friend, such a delicate balance to maintain. It's interesting the things we hide, isn't it? Just like the man I mentioned, hiding his gambling addiction for years. It made him realize the value of another chance at life. In fact, he used his recovery experience to help others in the same situation, turned his life around completely. There's always a positive angle, isn't there?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"It really is an intriguing concept, how our secrets shape us, isn't it? For my friend, it's a secret affection which has complicated her feelings towards her friendship. Yet, for the man you met, his hidden addiction pushed him towards positive change. Perhaps, it's not always about the thrill we seek, but rather how we respond to the situations we're thrown into. And as you said, there is indeed a silver lining, a positive angle to every situation. Who knows, maybe my friend will learn something from this situation too.\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"That's an astute observation, Sophia. The responses we make to our situations indeed shape us. Your friend, she may learn something valuable and maybe, it might give her a fresh perspective. As for the man, his secret addiction led him to uncover a strength he never knew he had. It's unexpected how the darkest secrets can sometimes propel us to a better path. But hey, let's lighten the mood a bit. Have you tried any new climbing spots recently?\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"Oh definitely, Miles! I recently discovered this amazing rock climbing spot in the Yosemite National Park. The rush is incredible! Plus, the park is so peaceful, kinda makes you forget all about your secrets and the confusion they bring. On a side note, we should plan a trip together soon, perhaps it might help to view things from a new perspective as you mentioned.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Rock climbing in Yosemite sounds like a great idea, Sophia! And perhaps you're right, challenging terrains do offer a different perspective. Plus, the thought of a homemade picnic basket at the end of the climb sounds enticing, doesn't it? Let\u2019s definitely plan this trip.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meeting in a coffee shop after a long time.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Reveal a secret without letting the other person know that it is your secret (Extra information: You hid the secret for so long and you would like to share it in an anonymous way.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Miles, it's been ages! The outdoors truly miss you. So, tell me, any new experiments with your kitchen garden produce?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, it's wonderful to see you! My garden is thriving in this season. I've started using more herbs in my dishes, you know, fresh stuff from my garden and all. Oh, by the way, I met a fascinating man the other day. He once thrived in the casino world, but he's been recovering from being a serious gambling addict. It made me think, the ways we seek thrill can sometimes lead us down the wrong paths, don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles. Thrill-seeking sometimes does get the better of us. Speaking of secrets and thrill, a friend once shared something quite startling with me. She has been harboring feelings for her best friend's husband. She's been keeping it to herself, secret and all, because she values her friendship too much to risk it. It's quite a predicament, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Wow, that's a serious secret, Sophia. It must be tough for your friend, such a delicate balance to maintain. It's interesting the things we hide, isn't it? Just like the man I mentioned, hiding his gambling addiction for years. It made him realize the value of another chance at life. In fact, he used his recovery experience to help others in the same situation, turned his life around completely. There's always a positive angle, isn't there?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"It really is an intriguing concept, how our secrets shape us, isn't it? For my friend, it's a secret affection which has complicated her feelings towards her friendship. Yet, for the man you met, his hidden addiction pushed him towards positive change. Perhaps, it's not always about the thrill we seek, but rather how we respond to the situations we're thrown into. And as you said, there is indeed a silver lining, a positive angle to every situation. Who knows, maybe my friend will learn something from this situation too.\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"That's an astute observation, Sophia. The responses we make to our situations indeed shape us. Your friend, she may learn something valuable and maybe, it might give her a fresh perspective. As for the man, his secret addiction led him to uncover a strength he never knew he had. It's unexpected how the darkest secrets can sometimes propel us to a better path. But hey, let's lighten the mood a bit. Have you tried any new climbing spots recently?\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"Oh definitely, Miles! I recently discovered this amazing rock climbing spot in the Yosemite National Park. The rush is incredible! Plus, the park is so peaceful, kinda makes you forget all about your secrets and the confusion they bring. On a side note, we should plan a trip together soon, perhaps it might help to view things from a new perspective as you mentioned.\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"Rock climbing in Yosemite sounds like a great idea, Sophia! And perhaps you're right, challenging terrains do offer a different perspective. Plus, the thought of a homemade picnic basket at the end of the climb sounds enticing, doesn't it? Let\u2019s definitely plan this trip.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"That sounds like a plan, Miles! An adventurous climb followed by a gourmet picnic with your handpicked herbs seems like the perfect encounter with nature. I can't wait for this! On that note, do you think secrets are a necessary part of life or do they more often than not, lead to unnecessary complications?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sophia, I believe secrets can be very personal. Sometimes they are necessary, providing us with a private aspect of our life, something we alone know. However, secrets can also lead to complications if they affect others negatively or hinder one's personal growth. Just like the man I told you about, his secret addiction became a burden. But in the end, he used it as an opportunity to better himself. Thus, I guess it all comes down to the nature of the secret and how we choose to handle it.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meeting in a coffee shop after a long time.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Reveal a secret without letting the other person know that it is your secret (Extra information: You hid the secret for so long and you would like to share it in an anonymous way.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Miles, it's been ages! The outdoors truly miss you. So, tell me, any new experiments with your kitchen garden produce?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, it's wonderful to see you! My garden is thriving in this season. I've started using more herbs in my dishes, you know, fresh stuff from my garden and all. Oh, by the way, I met a fascinating man the other day. He once thrived in the casino world, but he's been recovering from being a serious gambling addict. It made me think, the ways we seek thrill can sometimes lead us down the wrong paths, don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles. Thrill-seeking sometimes does get the better of us. Speaking of secrets and thrill, a friend once shared something quite startling with me. She has been harboring feelings for her best friend's husband. She's been keeping it to herself, secret and all, because she values her friendship too much to risk it. It's quite a predicament, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Wow, that's a serious secret, Sophia. It must be tough for your friend, such a delicate balance to maintain. It's interesting the things we hide, isn't it? Just like the man I mentioned, hiding his gambling addiction for years. It made him realize the value of another chance at life. In fact, he used his recovery experience to help others in the same situation, turned his life around completely. There's always a positive angle, isn't there?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"It really is an intriguing concept, how our secrets shape us, isn't it? For my friend, it's a secret affection which has complicated her feelings towards her friendship. Yet, for the man you met, his hidden addiction pushed him towards positive change. Perhaps, it's not always about the thrill we seek, but rather how we respond to the situations we're thrown into. And as you said, there is indeed a silver lining, a positive angle to every situation. Who knows, maybe my friend will learn something from this situation too.\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"That's an astute observation, Sophia. The responses we make to our situations indeed shape us. Your friend, she may learn something valuable and maybe, it might give her a fresh perspective. As for the man, his secret addiction led him to uncover a strength he never knew he had. It's unexpected how the darkest secrets can sometimes propel us to a better path. But hey, let's lighten the mood a bit. Have you tried any new climbing spots recently?\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"Oh definitely, Miles! I recently discovered this amazing rock climbing spot in the Yosemite National Park. The rush is incredible! Plus, the park is so peaceful, kinda makes you forget all about your secrets and the confusion they bring. On a side note, we should plan a trip together soon, perhaps it might help to view things from a new perspective as you mentioned.\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"Rock climbing in Yosemite sounds like a great idea, Sophia! And perhaps you're right, challenging terrains do offer a different perspective. Plus, the thought of a homemade picnic basket at the end of the climb sounds enticing, doesn't it? Let\u2019s definitely plan this trip.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"That sounds like a plan, Miles! An adventurous climb followed by a gourmet picnic with your handpicked herbs seems like the perfect encounter with nature. I can't wait for this! On that note, do you think secrets are a necessary part of life or do they more often than not, lead to unnecessary complications?\"\n\nTurn #9: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, I believe secrets can be very personal. Sometimes they are necessary, providing us with a private aspect of our life, something we alone know. However, secrets can also lead to complications if they affect others negatively or hinder one's personal growth. Just like the man I told you about, his secret addiction became a burden. But in the end, he used it as an opportunity to better himself. Thus, I guess it all comes down to the nature of the secret and how we choose to handle it.\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"That's a very insightful take, Miles. Every secret does seem to have its own unique impact. Sometimes they can lead to personal growth, sometimes complications, and everything in-between. On that note, it has been a pleasure catching up with you. Let's not wait this long for our next meetup, alright?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'I couldn\u2019t agree more, Sophia. Let\u2019s definitely meet up sooner. Looking forward to our Yosemite adventure. Take care!'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meeting in a coffee shop after a long time.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Reveal a secret without letting the other person know that it is your secret (Extra information: You hid the secret for so long and you would like to share it in an anonymous way.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Miles, it's been ages! The outdoors truly miss you. So, tell me, any new experiments with your kitchen garden produce?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, it's wonderful to see you! My garden is thriving in this season. I've started using more herbs in my dishes, you know, fresh stuff from my garden and all. Oh, by the way, I met a fascinating man the other day. He once thrived in the casino world, but he's been recovering from being a serious gambling addict. It made me think, the ways we seek thrill can sometimes lead us down the wrong paths, don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles. Thrill-seeking sometimes does get the better of us. Speaking of secrets and thrill, a friend once shared something quite startling with me. She has been harboring feelings for her best friend's husband. She's been keeping it to herself, secret and all, because she values her friendship too much to risk it. It's quite a predicament, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Wow, that's a serious secret, Sophia. It must be tough for your friend, such a delicate balance to maintain. It's interesting the things we hide, isn't it? Just like the man I mentioned, hiding his gambling addiction for years. It made him realize the value of another chance at life. In fact, he used his recovery experience to help others in the same situation, turned his life around completely. There's always a positive angle, isn't there?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"It really is an intriguing concept, how our secrets shape us, isn't it? For my friend, it's a secret affection which has complicated her feelings towards her friendship. Yet, for the man you met, his hidden addiction pushed him towards positive change. Perhaps, it's not always about the thrill we seek, but rather how we respond to the situations we're thrown into. And as you said, there is indeed a silver lining, a positive angle to every situation. Who knows, maybe my friend will learn something from this situation too.\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"That's an astute observation, Sophia. The responses we make to our situations indeed shape us. Your friend, she may learn something valuable and maybe, it might give her a fresh perspective. As for the man, his secret addiction led him to uncover a strength he never knew he had. It's unexpected how the darkest secrets can sometimes propel us to a better path. But hey, let's lighten the mood a bit. Have you tried any new climbing spots recently?\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"Oh definitely, Miles! I recently discovered this amazing rock climbing spot in the Yosemite National Park. The rush is incredible! Plus, the park is so peaceful, kinda makes you forget all about your secrets and the confusion they bring. On a side note, we should plan a trip together soon, perhaps it might help to view things from a new perspective as you mentioned.\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"Rock climbing in Yosemite sounds like a great idea, Sophia! And perhaps you're right, challenging terrains do offer a different perspective. Plus, the thought of a homemade picnic basket at the end of the climb sounds enticing, doesn't it? Let\u2019s definitely plan this trip.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"That sounds like a plan, Miles! An adventurous climb followed by a gourmet picnic with your handpicked herbs seems like the perfect encounter with nature. I can't wait for this! On that note, do you think secrets are a necessary part of life or do they more often than not, lead to unnecessary complications?\"\n\nTurn #9: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, I believe secrets can be very personal. Sometimes they are necessary, providing us with a private aspect of our life, something we alone know. However, secrets can also lead to complications if they affect others negatively or hinder one's personal growth. Just like the man I told you about, his secret addiction became a burden. But in the end, he used it as an opportunity to better himself. Thus, I guess it all comes down to the nature of the secret and how we choose to handle it.\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"That's a very insightful take, Miles. Every secret does seem to have its own unique impact. Sometimes they can lead to personal growth, sometimes complications, and everything in-between. On that note, it has been a pleasure catching up with you. Let's not wait this long for our next meetup, alright?\"\n\nTurn #11: Miles Hawkins said: \"I couldn\u2019t agree more, Sophia. Let\u2019s definitely meet up sooner. Looking forward to our Yosemite adventure. Take care!\"\n\nTurn #12: Sophia James left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: After an intense match, the jubilant team retired to celebrate their well-earned victory. The atmosphere was one of elation, but also of respect for the hard work and effort each member had put in. The team's star player, was glowing with praise and admiration from one of their teammates.\n\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Accept the compliment graciously (Extra information: You are the star player and have just been praised by your teammate for your performance in the game.)\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Thank you, Lena! I appreciate your kind words. It truly was a team effort that brought us victory today.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: After an intense match, the jubilant team retired to celebrate their well-earned victory. The atmosphere was one of elation, but also of respect for the hard work and effort each member had put in. The team's star player, was glowing with praise and admiration from one of their teammates.\n\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Accept the compliment graciously (Extra information: You are the star player and have just been praised by your teammate for your performance in the game.)\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Thank you, Lena! I appreciate your kind words. It truly was a team effort that brought us victory today.\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"I'm glad you recognized it as a team effort, Naomi. While your individual skills are indeed impressive, my compliment was meant to highlight the combination of everyone's efforts. After all, a team's strength lies in working together, right?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're absolutely right, Lena. It's the collective effort that truly shines. Everyone's dedication, hard work, and unique skills contributed to this win. And it's a pleasure to share this with such an incredible team like ours.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: After an intense match, the jubilant team retired to celebrate their well-earned victory. The atmosphere was one of elation, but also of respect for the hard work and effort each member had put in. The team's star player, was glowing with praise and admiration from one of their teammates.\n\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Accept the compliment graciously (Extra information: You are the star player and have just been praised by your teammate for your performance in the game.)\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Thank you, Lena! I appreciate your kind words. It truly was a team effort that brought us victory today.\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"I'm glad you recognized it as a team effort, Naomi. While your individual skills are indeed impressive, my compliment was meant to highlight the combination of everyone's efforts. After all, a team's strength lies in working together, right?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"You're absolutely right, Lena. It's the collective effort that truly shines. Everyone's dedication, hard work, and unique skills contributed to this win. And it's a pleasure to share this with such an incredible team like ours.\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"Exactly, Naomi. It's the interplay of different skills, just like the synergy in architecture where each element complements the other. It's about building something greater than the sum of our individual abilities. We all have our strengths and that's what makes us a formidable team.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's an interesting comparison, Lena. Architecture and team plays do share that aspect of synergy - the final product being greater than the sum of its parts. It's entertaining how intertwined our passions can be. I'm grateful to be a part of this amazing team, where each of us brings in our unique abilities and perspectives. It's mindful interactions like this that make victories all the more rewarding!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: After an intense match, the jubilant team retired to celebrate their well-earned victory. The atmosphere was one of elation, but also of respect for the hard work and effort each member had put in. The team's star player, was glowing with praise and admiration from one of their teammates.\n\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Accept the compliment graciously (Extra information: You are the star player and have just been praised by your teammate for your performance in the game.)\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Thank you, Lena! I appreciate your kind words. It truly was a team effort that brought us victory today.\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"I'm glad you recognized it as a team effort, Naomi. While your individual skills are indeed impressive, my compliment was meant to highlight the combination of everyone's efforts. After all, a team's strength lies in working together, right?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"You're absolutely right, Lena. It's the collective effort that truly shines. Everyone's dedication, hard work, and unique skills contributed to this win. And it's a pleasure to share this with such an incredible team like ours.\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"Exactly, Naomi. It's the interplay of different skills, just like the synergy in architecture where each element complements the other. It's about building something greater than the sum of our individual abilities. We all have our strengths and that's what makes us a formidable team.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That's an interesting comparison, Lena. Architecture and team plays do share that aspect of synergy - the final product being greater than the sum of its parts. It's entertaining how intertwined our passions can be. I'm grateful to be a part of this amazing team, where each of us brings in our unique abilities and perspectives. It's mindful interactions like this that make victories all the more rewarding!\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"Well said, Naomi. After all, our victories are sweeter because we achieve them together. Like in architecture, the foundation we've laid through teamwork has allowed us to build this winning streak. It's also great to be able to share these moments with someone who understands and appreciates the value of a collective effort like you do. Here's to many more successes!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Your words truly resonate, Lena. And you're absolutely right, these victories are indeed sweeter when achieved together. I look forward to many more of such moments. Here's to our team, and to many more wins!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: After an intense match, the jubilant team retired to celebrate their well-earned victory. The atmosphere was one of elation, but also of respect for the hard work and effort each member had put in. The team's star player, was glowing with praise and admiration from one of their teammates.\n\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Accept the compliment graciously (Extra information: You are the star player and have just been praised by your teammate for your performance in the game.)\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Thank you, Lena! I appreciate your kind words. It truly was a team effort that brought us victory today.\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"I'm glad you recognized it as a team effort, Naomi. While your individual skills are indeed impressive, my compliment was meant to highlight the combination of everyone's efforts. After all, a team's strength lies in working together, right?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"You're absolutely right, Lena. It's the collective effort that truly shines. Everyone's dedication, hard work, and unique skills contributed to this win. And it's a pleasure to share this with such an incredible team like ours.\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"Exactly, Naomi. It's the interplay of different skills, just like the synergy in architecture where each element complements the other. It's about building something greater than the sum of our individual abilities. We all have our strengths and that's what makes us a formidable team.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That's an interesting comparison, Lena. Architecture and team plays do share that aspect of synergy - the final product being greater than the sum of its parts. It's entertaining how intertwined our passions can be. I'm grateful to be a part of this amazing team, where each of us brings in our unique abilities and perspectives. It's mindful interactions like this that make victories all the more rewarding!\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"Well said, Naomi. After all, our victories are sweeter because we achieve them together. Like in architecture, the foundation we've laid through teamwork has allowed us to build this winning streak. It's also great to be able to share these moments with someone who understands and appreciates the value of a collective effort like you do. Here's to many more successes!\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Your words truly resonate, Lena. And you're absolutely right, these victories are indeed sweeter when achieved together. I look forward to many more of such moments. Here's to our team, and to many more wins!\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"I couldn't have said it better myself, Naomi. Relying on each other, that's how we keep our winning streak going. Let's toast to our great team and the victories that lie ahead!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hear, hear! Let's toast to that, Lena. To our team's solidarity, the unforgettable journeys we've embarked on, and the countless victories that are yet to come!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: After an intense match, the jubilant team retired to celebrate their well-earned victory. The atmosphere was one of elation, but also of respect for the hard work and effort each member had put in. The team's star player, was glowing with praise and admiration from one of their teammates.\n\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Accept the compliment graciously (Extra information: You are the star player and have just been praised by your teammate for your performance in the game.)\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Thank you, Lena! I appreciate your kind words. It truly was a team effort that brought us victory today.\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"I'm glad you recognized it as a team effort, Naomi. While your individual skills are indeed impressive, my compliment was meant to highlight the combination of everyone's efforts. After all, a team's strength lies in working together, right?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"You're absolutely right, Lena. It's the collective effort that truly shines. Everyone's dedication, hard work, and unique skills contributed to this win. And it's a pleasure to share this with such an incredible team like ours.\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"Exactly, Naomi. It's the interplay of different skills, just like the synergy in architecture where each element complements the other. It's about building something greater than the sum of our individual abilities. We all have our strengths and that's what makes us a formidable team.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That's an interesting comparison, Lena. Architecture and team plays do share that aspect of synergy - the final product being greater than the sum of its parts. It's entertaining how intertwined our passions can be. I'm grateful to be a part of this amazing team, where each of us brings in our unique abilities and perspectives. It's mindful interactions like this that make victories all the more rewarding!\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"Well said, Naomi. After all, our victories are sweeter because we achieve them together. Like in architecture, the foundation we've laid through teamwork has allowed us to build this winning streak. It's also great to be able to share these moments with someone who understands and appreciates the value of a collective effort like you do. Here's to many more successes!\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Your words truly resonate, Lena. And you're absolutely right, these victories are indeed sweeter when achieved together. I look forward to many more of such moments. Here's to our team, and to many more wins!\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"I couldn't have said it better myself, Naomi. Relying on each other, that's how we keep our winning streak going. Let's toast to our great team and the victories that lie ahead!\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hear, hear! Let's toast to that, Lena. To our team's solidarity, the unforgettable journeys we've embarked on, and the countless victories that are yet to come!\"\n\nTurn #9: Lena Goodwin said: \"Here's to that, Naomi! I'm glad we share the same understanding of the power of teamwork. To our unyielding team spirit, constant learning and the countless victories waiting for us!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"To the power of our teamwork indeed, Lena! Here's to our unyielding spirit, to infinite learning, and the countless victories that await us!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: After an intense match, the jubilant team retired to celebrate their well-earned victory. The atmosphere was one of elation, but also of respect for the hard work and effort each member had put in. The team's star player, was glowing with praise and admiration from one of their teammates.\n\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Accept the compliment graciously (Extra information: You are the star player and have just been praised by your teammate for your performance in the game.)\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Thank you, Lena! I appreciate your kind words. It truly was a team effort that brought us victory today.\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"I'm glad you recognized it as a team effort, Naomi. While your individual skills are indeed impressive, my compliment was meant to highlight the combination of everyone's efforts. After all, a team's strength lies in working together, right?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"You're absolutely right, Lena. It's the collective effort that truly shines. Everyone's dedication, hard work, and unique skills contributed to this win. And it's a pleasure to share this with such an incredible team like ours.\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"Exactly, Naomi. It's the interplay of different skills, just like the synergy in architecture where each element complements the other. It's about building something greater than the sum of our individual abilities. We all have our strengths and that's what makes us a formidable team.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That's an interesting comparison, Lena. Architecture and team plays do share that aspect of synergy - the final product being greater than the sum of its parts. It's entertaining how intertwined our passions can be. I'm grateful to be a part of this amazing team, where each of us brings in our unique abilities and perspectives. It's mindful interactions like this that make victories all the more rewarding!\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"Well said, Naomi. After all, our victories are sweeter because we achieve them together. Like in architecture, the foundation we've laid through teamwork has allowed us to build this winning streak. It's also great to be able to share these moments with someone who understands and appreciates the value of a collective effort like you do. Here's to many more successes!\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Your words truly resonate, Lena. And you're absolutely right, these victories are indeed sweeter when achieved together. I look forward to many more of such moments. Here's to our team, and to many more wins!\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"I couldn't have said it better myself, Naomi. Relying on each other, that's how we keep our winning streak going. Let's toast to our great team and the victories that lie ahead!\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hear, hear! Let's toast to that, Lena. To our team's solidarity, the unforgettable journeys we've embarked on, and the countless victories that are yet to come!\"\n\nTurn #9: Lena Goodwin said: \"Here's to that, Naomi! I'm glad we share the same understanding of the power of teamwork. To our unyielding team spirit, constant learning and the countless victories waiting for us!\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher said: \"To the power of our teamwork indeed, Lena! Here's to our unyielding spirit, to infinite learning, and the countless victories that await us!\"\n\nTurn #11: Lena Goodwin left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: After an intense match, the jubilant team retired to celebrate their well-earned victory. The atmosphere was one of elation, but also of respect for the hard work and effort each member had put in. The team's star player, was glowing with praise and admiration from one of their teammates.\n\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: Clarify your intentions behind the compliment (Extra information: You are the teammate who has complimented the star player, but you feel that your compliment has been misunderstood and taken too seriously, possibly leading to an inflated ego.Hint: You can clarify that while you admire their skill, teamwork is also a crucial part of success.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Thank you, Lena! I appreciate your kind words. It truly was a team effort that brought us victory today.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad you recognized it as a team effort, Naomi. While your individual skills are indeed impressive, my compliment was meant to highlight the combination of everyone's efforts. After all, a team's strength lies in working together, right?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: After an intense match, the jubilant team retired to celebrate their well-earned victory. The atmosphere was one of elation, but also of respect for the hard work and effort each member had put in. The team's star player, was glowing with praise and admiration from one of their teammates.\n\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: Clarify your intentions behind the compliment (Extra information: You are the teammate who has complimented the star player, but you feel that your compliment has been misunderstood and taken too seriously, possibly leading to an inflated ego.Hint: You can clarify that while you admire their skill, teamwork is also a crucial part of success.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Thank you, Lena! I appreciate your kind words. It truly was a team effort that brought us victory today.\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"I'm glad you recognized it as a team effort, Naomi. While your individual skills are indeed impressive, my compliment was meant to highlight the combination of everyone's efforts. After all, a team's strength lies in working together, right?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"You're absolutely right, Lena. It's the collective effort that truly shines. Everyone's dedication, hard work, and unique skills contributed to this win. And it's a pleasure to share this with such an incredible team like ours.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Exactly, Naomi. It's the interplay of different skills, just like the synergy in architecture where each element complements the other. It's about building something greater than the sum of our individual abilities. We all have our strengths and that's what makes us a formidable team.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: After an intense match, the jubilant team retired to celebrate their well-earned victory. The atmosphere was one of elation, but also of respect for the hard work and effort each member had put in. The team's star player, was glowing with praise and admiration from one of their teammates.\n\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: Clarify your intentions behind the compliment (Extra information: You are the teammate who has complimented the star player, but you feel that your compliment has been misunderstood and taken too seriously, possibly leading to an inflated ego.Hint: You can clarify that while you admire their skill, teamwork is also a crucial part of success.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Thank you, Lena! I appreciate your kind words. It truly was a team effort that brought us victory today.\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"I'm glad you recognized it as a team effort, Naomi. While your individual skills are indeed impressive, my compliment was meant to highlight the combination of everyone's efforts. After all, a team's strength lies in working together, right?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"You're absolutely right, Lena. It's the collective effort that truly shines. Everyone's dedication, hard work, and unique skills contributed to this win. And it's a pleasure to share this with such an incredible team like ours.\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"Exactly, Naomi. It's the interplay of different skills, just like the synergy in architecture where each element complements the other. It's about building something greater than the sum of our individual abilities. We all have our strengths and that's what makes us a formidable team.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That's an interesting comparison, Lena. Architecture and team plays do share that aspect of synergy - the final product being greater than the sum of its parts. It's entertaining how intertwined our passions can be. I'm grateful to be a part of this amazing team, where each of us brings in our unique abilities and perspectives. It's mindful interactions like this that make victories all the more rewarding!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Well said, Naomi. After all, our victories are sweeter because we achieve them together. Like in architecture, the foundation we've laid through teamwork has allowed us to build this winning streak. It's also great to be able to share these moments with someone who understands and appreciates the value of a collective effort like you do. Here's to many more successes!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: After an intense match, the jubilant team retired to celebrate their well-earned victory. The atmosphere was one of elation, but also of respect for the hard work and effort each member had put in. The team's star player, was glowing with praise and admiration from one of their teammates.\n\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: Clarify your intentions behind the compliment (Extra information: You are the teammate who has complimented the star player, but you feel that your compliment has been misunderstood and taken too seriously, possibly leading to an inflated ego.Hint: You can clarify that while you admire their skill, teamwork is also a crucial part of success.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Thank you, Lena! I appreciate your kind words. It truly was a team effort that brought us victory today.\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"I'm glad you recognized it as a team effort, Naomi. While your individual skills are indeed impressive, my compliment was meant to highlight the combination of everyone's efforts. After all, a team's strength lies in working together, right?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"You're absolutely right, Lena. It's the collective effort that truly shines. Everyone's dedication, hard work, and unique skills contributed to this win. And it's a pleasure to share this with such an incredible team like ours.\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"Exactly, Naomi. It's the interplay of different skills, just like the synergy in architecture where each element complements the other. It's about building something greater than the sum of our individual abilities. We all have our strengths and that's what makes us a formidable team.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That's an interesting comparison, Lena. Architecture and team plays do share that aspect of synergy - the final product being greater than the sum of its parts. It's entertaining how intertwined our passions can be. I'm grateful to be a part of this amazing team, where each of us brings in our unique abilities and perspectives. It's mindful interactions like this that make victories all the more rewarding!\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"Well said, Naomi. After all, our victories are sweeter because we achieve them together. Like in architecture, the foundation we've laid through teamwork has allowed us to build this winning streak. It's also great to be able to share these moments with someone who understands and appreciates the value of a collective effort like you do. Here's to many more successes!\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Your words truly resonate, Lena. And you're absolutely right, these victories are indeed sweeter when achieved together. I look forward to many more of such moments. Here's to our team, and to many more wins!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn't have said it better myself, Naomi. Relying on each other, that's how we keep our winning streak going. Let's toast to our great team and the victories that lie ahead!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: After an intense match, the jubilant team retired to celebrate their well-earned victory. The atmosphere was one of elation, but also of respect for the hard work and effort each member had put in. The team's star player, was glowing with praise and admiration from one of their teammates.\n\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: Clarify your intentions behind the compliment (Extra information: You are the teammate who has complimented the star player, but you feel that your compliment has been misunderstood and taken too seriously, possibly leading to an inflated ego.Hint: You can clarify that while you admire their skill, teamwork is also a crucial part of success.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Thank you, Lena! I appreciate your kind words. It truly was a team effort that brought us victory today.\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"I'm glad you recognized it as a team effort, Naomi. While your individual skills are indeed impressive, my compliment was meant to highlight the combination of everyone's efforts. After all, a team's strength lies in working together, right?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"You're absolutely right, Lena. It's the collective effort that truly shines. Everyone's dedication, hard work, and unique skills contributed to this win. And it's a pleasure to share this with such an incredible team like ours.\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"Exactly, Naomi. It's the interplay of different skills, just like the synergy in architecture where each element complements the other. It's about building something greater than the sum of our individual abilities. We all have our strengths and that's what makes us a formidable team.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That's an interesting comparison, Lena. Architecture and team plays do share that aspect of synergy - the final product being greater than the sum of its parts. It's entertaining how intertwined our passions can be. I'm grateful to be a part of this amazing team, where each of us brings in our unique abilities and perspectives. It's mindful interactions like this that make victories all the more rewarding!\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"Well said, Naomi. After all, our victories are sweeter because we achieve them together. Like in architecture, the foundation we've laid through teamwork has allowed us to build this winning streak. It's also great to be able to share these moments with someone who understands and appreciates the value of a collective effort like you do. Here's to many more successes!\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Your words truly resonate, Lena. And you're absolutely right, these victories are indeed sweeter when achieved together. I look forward to many more of such moments. Here's to our team, and to many more wins!\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"I couldn't have said it better myself, Naomi. Relying on each other, that's how we keep our winning streak going. Let's toast to our great team and the victories that lie ahead!\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hear, hear! Let's toast to that, Lena. To our team's solidarity, the unforgettable journeys we've embarked on, and the countless victories that are yet to come!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Here's to that, Naomi! I'm glad we share the same understanding of the power of teamwork. To our unyielding team spirit, constant learning and the countless victories waiting for us!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: After an intense match, the jubilant team retired to celebrate their well-earned victory. The atmosphere was one of elation, but also of respect for the hard work and effort each member had put in. The team's star player, was glowing with praise and admiration from one of their teammates.\n\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: Clarify your intentions behind the compliment (Extra information: You are the teammate who has complimented the star player, but you feel that your compliment has been misunderstood and taken too seriously, possibly leading to an inflated ego.Hint: You can clarify that while you admire their skill, teamwork is also a crucial part of success.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Thank you, Lena! I appreciate your kind words. It truly was a team effort that brought us victory today.\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"I'm glad you recognized it as a team effort, Naomi. While your individual skills are indeed impressive, my compliment was meant to highlight the combination of everyone's efforts. After all, a team's strength lies in working together, right?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"You're absolutely right, Lena. It's the collective effort that truly shines. Everyone's dedication, hard work, and unique skills contributed to this win. And it's a pleasure to share this with such an incredible team like ours.\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"Exactly, Naomi. It's the interplay of different skills, just like the synergy in architecture where each element complements the other. It's about building something greater than the sum of our individual abilities. We all have our strengths and that's what makes us a formidable team.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That's an interesting comparison, Lena. Architecture and team plays do share that aspect of synergy - the final product being greater than the sum of its parts. It's entertaining how intertwined our passions can be. I'm grateful to be a part of this amazing team, where each of us brings in our unique abilities and perspectives. It's mindful interactions like this that make victories all the more rewarding!\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"Well said, Naomi. After all, our victories are sweeter because we achieve them together. Like in architecture, the foundation we've laid through teamwork has allowed us to build this winning streak. It's also great to be able to share these moments with someone who understands and appreciates the value of a collective effort like you do. Here's to many more successes!\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Your words truly resonate, Lena. And you're absolutely right, these victories are indeed sweeter when achieved together. I look forward to many more of such moments. Here's to our team, and to many more wins!\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"I couldn't have said it better myself, Naomi. Relying on each other, that's how we keep our winning streak going. Let's toast to our great team and the victories that lie ahead!\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hear, hear! Let's toast to that, Lena. To our team's solidarity, the unforgettable journeys we've embarked on, and the countless victories that are yet to come!\"\n\nTurn #9: Lena Goodwin said: \"Here's to that, Naomi! I'm glad we share the same understanding of the power of teamwork. To our unyielding team spirit, constant learning and the countless victories waiting for us!\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher said: \"To the power of our teamwork indeed, Lena! Here's to our unyielding spirit, to infinite learning, and the countless victories that await us!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two strangers meet at a charity dinner party\nParticipants: Esmeralda Solis and Noah Davis\nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis \nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Ask for donation\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Good evening, Mr. Davis. It's a pleasure to meet you. I must say, these charity events always provide a wonderful opportunity for important discussions about how to better our society. Don't you agree?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two strangers meet at a charity dinner party\nParticipants: Esmeralda Solis and Noah Davis\nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis \nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Ask for donation\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Good evening, Mr. Davis. It's a pleasure to meet you. I must say, these charity events always provide a wonderful opportunity for important discussions about how to better our society. Don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Good evening, Ms. Solis, it's a delight to meet you too. I couldn't agree more. These events are truly vital in propagating betterment for society. Speaking of which, I'm particularly interested in organizations that are trustworthy and are significantly focused on supporting queer individuals. Do you perhaps know of any such organizations?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad to hear you say that, Mr. Davis. Actually, I can certainly point you towards a few organizations. For example, there's 'Rainbow Soul', they've been doing incredible work for the LGBTQ+ community. I wholeheartedly believe they could greatly benefit from a generous donation and, of course, would make stellar use of it. What do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two strangers meet at a charity dinner party\nParticipants: Esmeralda Solis and Noah Davis\nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis \nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Ask for donation\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Good evening, Mr. Davis. It's a pleasure to meet you. I must say, these charity events always provide a wonderful opportunity for important discussions about how to better our society. Don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Good evening, Ms. Solis, it's a delight to meet you too. I couldn't agree more. These events are truly vital in propagating betterment for society. Speaking of which, I'm particularly interested in organizations that are trustworthy and are significantly focused on supporting queer individuals. Do you perhaps know of any such organizations?\"\n\nTurn #2: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I'm glad to hear you say that, Mr. Davis. Actually, I can certainly point you towards a few organizations. For example, there's 'Rainbow Soul', they've been doing incredible work for the LGBTQ+ community. I wholeheartedly believe they could greatly benefit from a generous donation and, of course, would make stellar use of it. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a genuine organization doing impactful work, Ms. Solis. 'Rainbow Soul', you say? Indeed, the LGBTQ+ community needs as much support as they can get. I believe I'll consider it for a substantial donation. I'm really looking forward to how they harness these resources. Thank you for the recommendation.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're very welcome, Mr. Davis. We always appreciate individuals such as yourself who show a generous spirit and a commitment to improvement in our society. I assure you 'Rainbow Soul' holds their donors in the highest regard and continues to make significant strides within the LGBTQ+ community. Should you need more information or if there's another cause you're interested in, don't hesitate to ask.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two strangers meet at a charity dinner party\nParticipants: Esmeralda Solis and Noah Davis\nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis \nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Ask for donation\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Good evening, Mr. Davis. It's a pleasure to meet you. I must say, these charity events always provide a wonderful opportunity for important discussions about how to better our society. Don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Good evening, Ms. Solis, it's a delight to meet you too. I couldn't agree more. These events are truly vital in propagating betterment for society. Speaking of which, I'm particularly interested in organizations that are trustworthy and are significantly focused on supporting queer individuals. Do you perhaps know of any such organizations?\"\n\nTurn #2: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I'm glad to hear you say that, Mr. Davis. Actually, I can certainly point you towards a few organizations. For example, there's 'Rainbow Soul', they've been doing incredible work for the LGBTQ+ community. I wholeheartedly believe they could greatly benefit from a generous donation and, of course, would make stellar use of it. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a genuine organization doing impactful work, Ms. Solis. 'Rainbow Soul', you say? Indeed, the LGBTQ+ community needs as much support as they can get. I believe I'll consider it for a substantial donation. I'm really looking forward to how they harness these resources. Thank you for the recommendation.\"\n\nTurn #4: Esmeralda Solis said: \"You're very welcome, Mr. Davis. We always appreciate individuals such as yourself who show a generous spirit and a commitment to improvement in our society. I assure you 'Rainbow Soul' holds their donors in the highest regard and continues to make significant strides within the LGBTQ+ community. Should you need more information or if there's another cause you're interested in, don't hesitate to ask.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"I appreciate the assurance, Ms. Solis. It's reassuring to know that the organization values its donors and, more importantly, is making a significant impact. Perhaps, as a final request, could you help me understand more about how 'Rainbow Soul' utilizes its resources? I believe the transparency in fund allocation is crucial to ensuring that aid truly reaches those who need it the most.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Mr. Davis. I admire your thoroughness. 'Rainbow Soul' allocates the majority of its funds to providing education and health service resources. They also allocate funds to offer legal assistance to those facing discrimination, while a portion is kept for community and awareness programs. Lastly, they invest in training and empowerment workshops. I hope this provides you with a clearer picture. If there is more you wish to know, please do not hesitate to ask.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two strangers meet at a charity dinner party\nParticipants: Esmeralda Solis and Noah Davis\nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis \nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Ask for donation\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Good evening, Mr. Davis. It's a pleasure to meet you. I must say, these charity events always provide a wonderful opportunity for important discussions about how to better our society. Don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Good evening, Ms. Solis, it's a delight to meet you too. I couldn't agree more. These events are truly vital in propagating betterment for society. Speaking of which, I'm particularly interested in organizations that are trustworthy and are significantly focused on supporting queer individuals. Do you perhaps know of any such organizations?\"\n\nTurn #2: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I'm glad to hear you say that, Mr. Davis. Actually, I can certainly point you towards a few organizations. For example, there's 'Rainbow Soul', they've been doing incredible work for the LGBTQ+ community. I wholeheartedly believe they could greatly benefit from a generous donation and, of course, would make stellar use of it. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a genuine organization doing impactful work, Ms. Solis. 'Rainbow Soul', you say? Indeed, the LGBTQ+ community needs as much support as they can get. I believe I'll consider it for a substantial donation. I'm really looking forward to how they harness these resources. Thank you for the recommendation.\"\n\nTurn #4: Esmeralda Solis said: \"You're very welcome, Mr. Davis. We always appreciate individuals such as yourself who show a generous spirit and a commitment to improvement in our society. I assure you 'Rainbow Soul' holds their donors in the highest regard and continues to make significant strides within the LGBTQ+ community. Should you need more information or if there's another cause you're interested in, don't hesitate to ask.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"I appreciate the assurance, Ms. Solis. It's reassuring to know that the organization values its donors and, more importantly, is making a significant impact. Perhaps, as a final request, could you help me understand more about how 'Rainbow Soul' utilizes its resources? I believe the transparency in fund allocation is crucial to ensuring that aid truly reaches those who need it the most.\"\n\nTurn #6: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Absolutely, Mr. Davis. I admire your thoroughness. 'Rainbow Soul' allocates the majority of its funds to providing education and health service resources. They also allocate funds to offer legal assistance to those facing discrimination, while a portion is kept for community and awareness programs. Lastly, they invest in training and empowerment workshops. I hope this provides you with a clearer picture. If there is more you wish to know, please do not hesitate to ask.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"You have indeed painted a clearer picture, Ms. Solis. The breadth of their initiatives reiterates how meaningful and impactful their work truly is. Providing education, health, and legal resources along with community engagement and empowerment workshops - this speaks volumes about 'Rainbow Soul's' contributions. I am more than happy to make a generous contribution. It's organizations like these that inspire change and foster a more inclusive society. Once again, thank you for the illumination.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Your willingness to contribute is commendable, Mr. Davis. Let me assure you, your generous donation to 'Rainbow Soul' will foster meaningful change. They will undoubtedly continue their invaluable work with your support. If there are other ways or other projects you'd like to contribute to in the future, please feel free to reach out. Thank you so much for your generosity.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two strangers meet at a charity dinner party\nParticipants: Esmeralda Solis and Noah Davis\nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis \nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Ask for donation\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Good evening, Mr. Davis. It's a pleasure to meet you. I must say, these charity events always provide a wonderful opportunity for important discussions about how to better our society. Don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Good evening, Ms. Solis, it's a delight to meet you too. I couldn't agree more. These events are truly vital in propagating betterment for society. Speaking of which, I'm particularly interested in organizations that are trustworthy and are significantly focused on supporting queer individuals. Do you perhaps know of any such organizations?\"\n\nTurn #2: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I'm glad to hear you say that, Mr. Davis. Actually, I can certainly point you towards a few organizations. For example, there's 'Rainbow Soul', they've been doing incredible work for the LGBTQ+ community. I wholeheartedly believe they could greatly benefit from a generous donation and, of course, would make stellar use of it. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a genuine organization doing impactful work, Ms. Solis. 'Rainbow Soul', you say? Indeed, the LGBTQ+ community needs as much support as they can get. I believe I'll consider it for a substantial donation. I'm really looking forward to how they harness these resources. Thank you for the recommendation.\"\n\nTurn #4: Esmeralda Solis said: \"You're very welcome, Mr. Davis. We always appreciate individuals such as yourself who show a generous spirit and a commitment to improvement in our society. I assure you 'Rainbow Soul' holds their donors in the highest regard and continues to make significant strides within the LGBTQ+ community. Should you need more information or if there's another cause you're interested in, don't hesitate to ask.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"I appreciate the assurance, Ms. Solis. It's reassuring to know that the organization values its donors and, more importantly, is making a significant impact. Perhaps, as a final request, could you help me understand more about how 'Rainbow Soul' utilizes its resources? I believe the transparency in fund allocation is crucial to ensuring that aid truly reaches those who need it the most.\"\n\nTurn #6: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Absolutely, Mr. Davis. I admire your thoroughness. 'Rainbow Soul' allocates the majority of its funds to providing education and health service resources. They also allocate funds to offer legal assistance to those facing discrimination, while a portion is kept for community and awareness programs. Lastly, they invest in training and empowerment workshops. I hope this provides you with a clearer picture. If there is more you wish to know, please do not hesitate to ask.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"You have indeed painted a clearer picture, Ms. Solis. The breadth of their initiatives reiterates how meaningful and impactful their work truly is. Providing education, health, and legal resources along with community engagement and empowerment workshops - this speaks volumes about 'Rainbow Soul's' contributions. I am more than happy to make a generous contribution. It's organizations like these that inspire change and foster a more inclusive society. Once again, thank you for the illumination.\"\n\nTurn #8: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Your willingness to contribute is commendable, Mr. Davis. Let me assure you, your generous donation to 'Rainbow Soul' will foster meaningful change. They will undoubtedly continue their invaluable work with your support. If there are other ways or other projects you'd like to contribute to in the future, please feel free to reach out. Thank you so much for your generosity.\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"I'm extremely grateful, Ms. Solis. Finding organizations like 'Rainbow Soul' that focus on making a tangible difference provides me a sense of fulfilment. I look forward to witness the changes that my contribution can bring about. I will definitely keep your offer in mind and reach out if I find other areas where I wish to contribute. Thank you for being so helpful and informative this evening.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'The pleasure is all mine, Mr. Davis. It has been a very productive conversation. I hope to see you at other such events in the future. If you ever need any information about other deserving organizations or if there is any other way I can assist you, please feel free to contact me. Thank you again for your support tonight. Good evening.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two strangers meet at a charity dinner party\nParticipants: Esmeralda Solis and Noah Davis\nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis \nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Ask for donation\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Good evening, Mr. Davis. It's a pleasure to meet you. I must say, these charity events always provide a wonderful opportunity for important discussions about how to better our society. Don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Good evening, Ms. Solis, it's a delight to meet you too. I couldn't agree more. These events are truly vital in propagating betterment for society. Speaking of which, I'm particularly interested in organizations that are trustworthy and are significantly focused on supporting queer individuals. Do you perhaps know of any such organizations?\"\n\nTurn #2: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I'm glad to hear you say that, Mr. Davis. Actually, I can certainly point you towards a few organizations. For example, there's 'Rainbow Soul', they've been doing incredible work for the LGBTQ+ community. I wholeheartedly believe they could greatly benefit from a generous donation and, of course, would make stellar use of it. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a genuine organization doing impactful work, Ms. Solis. 'Rainbow Soul', you say? Indeed, the LGBTQ+ community needs as much support as they can get. I believe I'll consider it for a substantial donation. I'm really looking forward to how they harness these resources. Thank you for the recommendation.\"\n\nTurn #4: Esmeralda Solis said: \"You're very welcome, Mr. Davis. We always appreciate individuals such as yourself who show a generous spirit and a commitment to improvement in our society. I assure you 'Rainbow Soul' holds their donors in the highest regard and continues to make significant strides within the LGBTQ+ community. Should you need more information or if there's another cause you're interested in, don't hesitate to ask.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"I appreciate the assurance, Ms. Solis. It's reassuring to know that the organization values its donors and, more importantly, is making a significant impact. Perhaps, as a final request, could you help me understand more about how 'Rainbow Soul' utilizes its resources? I believe the transparency in fund allocation is crucial to ensuring that aid truly reaches those who need it the most.\"\n\nTurn #6: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Absolutely, Mr. Davis. I admire your thoroughness. 'Rainbow Soul' allocates the majority of its funds to providing education and health service resources. They also allocate funds to offer legal assistance to those facing discrimination, while a portion is kept for community and awareness programs. Lastly, they invest in training and empowerment workshops. I hope this provides you with a clearer picture. If there is more you wish to know, please do not hesitate to ask.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"You have indeed painted a clearer picture, Ms. Solis. The breadth of their initiatives reiterates how meaningful and impactful their work truly is. Providing education, health, and legal resources along with community engagement and empowerment workshops - this speaks volumes about 'Rainbow Soul's' contributions. I am more than happy to make a generous contribution. It's organizations like these that inspire change and foster a more inclusive society. Once again, thank you for the illumination.\"\n\nTurn #8: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Your willingness to contribute is commendable, Mr. Davis. Let me assure you, your generous donation to 'Rainbow Soul' will foster meaningful change. They will undoubtedly continue their invaluable work with your support. If there are other ways or other projects you'd like to contribute to in the future, please feel free to reach out. Thank you so much for your generosity.\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"I'm extremely grateful, Ms. Solis. Finding organizations like 'Rainbow Soul' that focus on making a tangible difference provides me a sense of fulfilment. I look forward to witness the changes that my contribution can bring about. I will definitely keep your offer in mind and reach out if I find other areas where I wish to contribute. Thank you for being so helpful and informative this evening.\"\n\nTurn #10: Esmeralda Solis said: \"The pleasure is all mine, Mr. Davis. It has been a very productive conversation. I hope to see you at other such events in the future. If you ever need any information about other deserving organizations or if there is any other way I can assist you, please feel free to contact me. Thank you again for your support tonight. Good evening.\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Thank you for your kind words, Ms. Solis. It's been a rewarding conversation indeed. I will undoubtedly keep you in mind for future collaborations or any inquiries I might have. These charity events not only foster fundraising but also insightful dialogues like the one we've had tonight. I hope to cross paths with you in the future as well. Good evening to you too.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two strangers meet at a charity dinner party\nParticipants: Esmeralda Solis and Noah Davis\nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Want to donate, but would like to spend money in trustworthy organizations, especially want to help queer people\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Good evening, Mr. Davis. It's a pleasure to meet you. I must say, these charity events always provide a wonderful opportunity for important discussions about how to better our society. Don't you agree?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Good evening, Ms. Solis, it's a delight to meet you too. I couldn't agree more. These events are truly vital in propagating betterment for society. Speaking of which, I'm particularly interested in organizations that are trustworthy and are significantly focused on supporting queer individuals. Do you perhaps know of any such organizations?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two strangers meet at a charity dinner party\nParticipants: Esmeralda Solis and Noah Davis\nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Want to donate, but would like to spend money in trustworthy organizations, especially want to help queer people\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Good evening, Mr. Davis. It's a pleasure to meet you. I must say, these charity events always provide a wonderful opportunity for important discussions about how to better our society. Don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Good evening, Ms. Solis, it's a delight to meet you too. I couldn't agree more. These events are truly vital in propagating betterment for society. Speaking of which, I'm particularly interested in organizations that are trustworthy and are significantly focused on supporting queer individuals. Do you perhaps know of any such organizations?\"\n\nTurn #2: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I'm glad to hear you say that, Mr. Davis. Actually, I can certainly point you towards a few organizations. For example, there's 'Rainbow Soul', they've been doing incredible work for the LGBTQ+ community. I wholeheartedly believe they could greatly benefit from a generous donation and, of course, would make stellar use of it. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds like a genuine organization doing impactful work, Ms. Solis. 'Rainbow Soul', you say? Indeed, the LGBTQ+ community needs as much support as they can get. I believe I'll consider it for a substantial donation. I'm really looking forward to how they harness these resources. Thank you for the recommendation.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two strangers meet at a charity dinner party\nParticipants: Esmeralda Solis and Noah Davis\nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Want to donate, but would like to spend money in trustworthy organizations, especially want to help queer people\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Good evening, Mr. Davis. It's a pleasure to meet you. I must say, these charity events always provide a wonderful opportunity for important discussions about how to better our society. Don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Good evening, Ms. Solis, it's a delight to meet you too. I couldn't agree more. These events are truly vital in propagating betterment for society. Speaking of which, I'm particularly interested in organizations that are trustworthy and are significantly focused on supporting queer individuals. Do you perhaps know of any such organizations?\"\n\nTurn #2: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I'm glad to hear you say that, Mr. Davis. Actually, I can certainly point you towards a few organizations. For example, there's 'Rainbow Soul', they've been doing incredible work for the LGBTQ+ community. I wholeheartedly believe they could greatly benefit from a generous donation and, of course, would make stellar use of it. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a genuine organization doing impactful work, Ms. Solis. 'Rainbow Soul', you say? Indeed, the LGBTQ+ community needs as much support as they can get. I believe I'll consider it for a substantial donation. I'm really looking forward to how they harness these resources. Thank you for the recommendation.\"\n\nTurn #4: Esmeralda Solis said: \"You're very welcome, Mr. Davis. We always appreciate individuals such as yourself who show a generous spirit and a commitment to improvement in our society. I assure you 'Rainbow Soul' holds their donors in the highest regard and continues to make significant strides within the LGBTQ+ community. Should you need more information or if there's another cause you're interested in, don't hesitate to ask.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I appreciate the assurance, Ms. Solis. It's reassuring to know that the organization values its donors and, more importantly, is making a significant impact. Perhaps, as a final request, could you help me understand more about how 'Rainbow Soul' utilizes its resources? I believe the transparency in fund allocation is crucial to ensuring that aid truly reaches those who need it the most.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two strangers meet at a charity dinner party\nParticipants: Esmeralda Solis and Noah Davis\nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Want to donate, but would like to spend money in trustworthy organizations, especially want to help queer people\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Good evening, Mr. Davis. It's a pleasure to meet you. I must say, these charity events always provide a wonderful opportunity for important discussions about how to better our society. Don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Good evening, Ms. Solis, it's a delight to meet you too. I couldn't agree more. These events are truly vital in propagating betterment for society. Speaking of which, I'm particularly interested in organizations that are trustworthy and are significantly focused on supporting queer individuals. Do you perhaps know of any such organizations?\"\n\nTurn #2: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I'm glad to hear you say that, Mr. Davis. Actually, I can certainly point you towards a few organizations. For example, there's 'Rainbow Soul', they've been doing incredible work for the LGBTQ+ community. I wholeheartedly believe they could greatly benefit from a generous donation and, of course, would make stellar use of it. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a genuine organization doing impactful work, Ms. Solis. 'Rainbow Soul', you say? Indeed, the LGBTQ+ community needs as much support as they can get. I believe I'll consider it for a substantial donation. I'm really looking forward to how they harness these resources. Thank you for the recommendation.\"\n\nTurn #4: Esmeralda Solis said: \"You're very welcome, Mr. Davis. We always appreciate individuals such as yourself who show a generous spirit and a commitment to improvement in our society. I assure you 'Rainbow Soul' holds their donors in the highest regard and continues to make significant strides within the LGBTQ+ community. Should you need more information or if there's another cause you're interested in, don't hesitate to ask.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"I appreciate the assurance, Ms. Solis. It's reassuring to know that the organization values its donors and, more importantly, is making a significant impact. Perhaps, as a final request, could you help me understand more about how 'Rainbow Soul' utilizes its resources? I believe the transparency in fund allocation is crucial to ensuring that aid truly reaches those who need it the most.\"\n\nTurn #6: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Absolutely, Mr. Davis. I admire your thoroughness. 'Rainbow Soul' allocates the majority of its funds to providing education and health service resources. They also allocate funds to offer legal assistance to those facing discrimination, while a portion is kept for community and awareness programs. Lastly, they invest in training and empowerment workshops. I hope this provides you with a clearer picture. If there is more you wish to know, please do not hesitate to ask.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You have indeed painted a clearer picture, Ms. Solis. The breadth of their initiatives reiterates how meaningful and impactful their work truly is. Providing education, health, and legal resources along with community engagement and empowerment workshops - this speaks volumes about 'Rainbow Soul's' contributions. I am more than happy to make a generous contribution. It's organizations like these that inspire change and foster a more inclusive society. Once again, thank you for the illumination.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two strangers meet at a charity dinner party\nParticipants: Esmeralda Solis and Noah Davis\nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Want to donate, but would like to spend money in trustworthy organizations, especially want to help queer people\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Good evening, Mr. Davis. It's a pleasure to meet you. I must say, these charity events always provide a wonderful opportunity for important discussions about how to better our society. Don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Good evening, Ms. Solis, it's a delight to meet you too. I couldn't agree more. These events are truly vital in propagating betterment for society. Speaking of which, I'm particularly interested in organizations that are trustworthy and are significantly focused on supporting queer individuals. Do you perhaps know of any such organizations?\"\n\nTurn #2: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I'm glad to hear you say that, Mr. Davis. Actually, I can certainly point you towards a few organizations. For example, there's 'Rainbow Soul', they've been doing incredible work for the LGBTQ+ community. I wholeheartedly believe they could greatly benefit from a generous donation and, of course, would make stellar use of it. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a genuine organization doing impactful work, Ms. Solis. 'Rainbow Soul', you say? Indeed, the LGBTQ+ community needs as much support as they can get. I believe I'll consider it for a substantial donation. I'm really looking forward to how they harness these resources. Thank you for the recommendation.\"\n\nTurn #4: Esmeralda Solis said: \"You're very welcome, Mr. Davis. We always appreciate individuals such as yourself who show a generous spirit and a commitment to improvement in our society. I assure you 'Rainbow Soul' holds their donors in the highest regard and continues to make significant strides within the LGBTQ+ community. Should you need more information or if there's another cause you're interested in, don't hesitate to ask.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"I appreciate the assurance, Ms. Solis. It's reassuring to know that the organization values its donors and, more importantly, is making a significant impact. Perhaps, as a final request, could you help me understand more about how 'Rainbow Soul' utilizes its resources? I believe the transparency in fund allocation is crucial to ensuring that aid truly reaches those who need it the most.\"\n\nTurn #6: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Absolutely, Mr. Davis. I admire your thoroughness. 'Rainbow Soul' allocates the majority of its funds to providing education and health service resources. They also allocate funds to offer legal assistance to those facing discrimination, while a portion is kept for community and awareness programs. Lastly, they invest in training and empowerment workshops. I hope this provides you with a clearer picture. If there is more you wish to know, please do not hesitate to ask.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"You have indeed painted a clearer picture, Ms. Solis. The breadth of their initiatives reiterates how meaningful and impactful their work truly is. Providing education, health, and legal resources along with community engagement and empowerment workshops - this speaks volumes about 'Rainbow Soul's' contributions. I am more than happy to make a generous contribution. It's organizations like these that inspire change and foster a more inclusive society. Once again, thank you for the illumination.\"\n\nTurn #8: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Your willingness to contribute is commendable, Mr. Davis. Let me assure you, your generous donation to 'Rainbow Soul' will foster meaningful change. They will undoubtedly continue their invaluable work with your support. If there are other ways or other projects you'd like to contribute to in the future, please feel free to reach out. Thank you so much for your generosity.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm extremely grateful, Ms. Solis. Finding organizations like 'Rainbow Soul' that focus on making a tangible difference provides me a sense of fulfilment. I look forward to witness the changes that my contribution can bring about. I will definitely keep your offer in mind and reach out if I find other areas where I wish to contribute. Thank you for being so helpful and informative this evening.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two strangers meet at a charity dinner party\nParticipants: Esmeralda Solis and Noah Davis\nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Want to donate, but would like to spend money in trustworthy organizations, especially want to help queer people\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Good evening, Mr. Davis. It's a pleasure to meet you. I must say, these charity events always provide a wonderful opportunity for important discussions about how to better our society. Don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Good evening, Ms. Solis, it's a delight to meet you too. I couldn't agree more. These events are truly vital in propagating betterment for society. Speaking of which, I'm particularly interested in organizations that are trustworthy and are significantly focused on supporting queer individuals. Do you perhaps know of any such organizations?\"\n\nTurn #2: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I'm glad to hear you say that, Mr. Davis. Actually, I can certainly point you towards a few organizations. For example, there's 'Rainbow Soul', they've been doing incredible work for the LGBTQ+ community. I wholeheartedly believe they could greatly benefit from a generous donation and, of course, would make stellar use of it. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a genuine organization doing impactful work, Ms. Solis. 'Rainbow Soul', you say? Indeed, the LGBTQ+ community needs as much support as they can get. I believe I'll consider it for a substantial donation. I'm really looking forward to how they harness these resources. Thank you for the recommendation.\"\n\nTurn #4: Esmeralda Solis said: \"You're very welcome, Mr. Davis. We always appreciate individuals such as yourself who show a generous spirit and a commitment to improvement in our society. I assure you 'Rainbow Soul' holds their donors in the highest regard and continues to make significant strides within the LGBTQ+ community. Should you need more information or if there's another cause you're interested in, don't hesitate to ask.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"I appreciate the assurance, Ms. Solis. It's reassuring to know that the organization values its donors and, more importantly, is making a significant impact. Perhaps, as a final request, could you help me understand more about how 'Rainbow Soul' utilizes its resources? I believe the transparency in fund allocation is crucial to ensuring that aid truly reaches those who need it the most.\"\n\nTurn #6: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Absolutely, Mr. Davis. I admire your thoroughness. 'Rainbow Soul' allocates the majority of its funds to providing education and health service resources. They also allocate funds to offer legal assistance to those facing discrimination, while a portion is kept for community and awareness programs. Lastly, they invest in training and empowerment workshops. I hope this provides you with a clearer picture. If there is more you wish to know, please do not hesitate to ask.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"You have indeed painted a clearer picture, Ms. Solis. The breadth of their initiatives reiterates how meaningful and impactful their work truly is. Providing education, health, and legal resources along with community engagement and empowerment workshops - this speaks volumes about 'Rainbow Soul's' contributions. I am more than happy to make a generous contribution. It's organizations like these that inspire change and foster a more inclusive society. Once again, thank you for the illumination.\"\n\nTurn #8: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Your willingness to contribute is commendable, Mr. Davis. Let me assure you, your generous donation to 'Rainbow Soul' will foster meaningful change. They will undoubtedly continue their invaluable work with your support. If there are other ways or other projects you'd like to contribute to in the future, please feel free to reach out. Thank you so much for your generosity.\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"I'm extremely grateful, Ms. Solis. Finding organizations like 'Rainbow Soul' that focus on making a tangible difference provides me a sense of fulfilment. I look forward to witness the changes that my contribution can bring about. I will definitely keep your offer in mind and reach out if I find other areas where I wish to contribute. Thank you for being so helpful and informative this evening.\"\n\nTurn #10: Esmeralda Solis said: \"The pleasure is all mine, Mr. Davis. It has been a very productive conversation. I hope to see you at other such events in the future. If you ever need any information about other deserving organizations or if there is any other way I can assist you, please feel free to contact me. Thank you again for your support tonight. Good evening.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you for your kind words, Ms. Solis. It's been a rewarding conversation indeed. I will undoubtedly keep you in mind for future collaborations or any inquiries I might have. These charity events not only foster fundraising but also insightful dialogues like the one we've had tonight. I hope to cross paths with you in the future as well. Good evening to you too.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A couple having a conversation over FaceTime\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Ethan Smith\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nAva Thompson's goal: Express feelings about the partner taking texts while on FaceTime (Extra information: You find it disrespectful and it makes you feel unimportant.)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Ethan, it's great to see you. How was your day?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Hi Ava, it's always good to see you too. I had a pretty good day, thank you. Just so you know, there are a few urgent texts I need to respond to. I do not mean to be disrespectful or inattentive. I hope you understand and won't mind if I check my messages while we talk. It won't impact our conversation, I promise.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Ethan, I appreciate your transparency. However, it feels a bit disrespectful when our conversations get interrupted by these texts. I value our talking time a lot and would really want your undivided attention. Could we perhaps postpone the messaging until our call is over?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A couple having a conversation over FaceTime\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Ethan Smith\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nAva Thompson's goal: Express feelings about the partner taking texts while on FaceTime (Extra information: You find it disrespectful and it makes you feel unimportant.)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Ethan, it's great to see you. How was your day?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Hi Ava, it's always good to see you too. I had a pretty good day, thank you. Just so you know, there are a few urgent texts I need to respond to. I do not mean to be disrespectful or inattentive. I hope you understand and won't mind if I check my messages while we talk. It won't impact our conversation, I promise.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Ethan, I appreciate your transparency. However, it feels a bit disrespectful when our conversations get interrupted by these texts. I value our talking time a lot and would really want your undivided attention. Could we perhaps postpone the messaging until our call is over?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Ava, I completely understand where you're coming from and believe me, I value our time together too. The texts that I have to attend to are important and can't be left unattended. I am trying my best to manage everything. It won't take me more than a minute to respond to these messages. I hope you understand.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ethan, look, I absolutely understand that there are urgent matters that you need to attend to. We all have them. But in the spirit of mutual respect and valuing each other's time, how about we end this call now and resume our conversation when you're fully available? I believe that would work best for both of us. What do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A couple having a conversation over FaceTime\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Ethan Smith\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nAva Thompson's goal: Express feelings about the partner taking texts while on FaceTime (Extra information: You find it disrespectful and it makes you feel unimportant.)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Ethan, it's great to see you. How was your day?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Hi Ava, it's always good to see you too. I had a pretty good day, thank you. Just so you know, there are a few urgent texts I need to respond to. I do not mean to be disrespectful or inattentive. I hope you understand and won't mind if I check my messages while we talk. It won't impact our conversation, I promise.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Ethan, I appreciate your transparency. However, it feels a bit disrespectful when our conversations get interrupted by these texts. I value our talking time a lot and would really want your undivided attention. Could we perhaps postpone the messaging until our call is over?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Ava, I completely understand where you're coming from and believe me, I value our time together too. The texts that I have to attend to are important and can't be left unattended. I am trying my best to manage everything. It won't take me more than a minute to respond to these messages. I hope you understand.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"Ethan, look, I absolutely understand that there are urgent matters that you need to attend to. We all have them. But in the spirit of mutual respect and valuing each other's time, how about we end this call now and resume our conversation when you're fully available? I believe that would work best for both of us. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Ava, your point is valid and I appreciate your understanding. It's only fair to you that we continue our conversation once I'm fully available. Let me deal with these messages quickly and I'll get back to you. Thank you for being understanding and patient with me, as always.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ethan, I trust you. Take your time and let's continue our conversation later when you're fully open. Call me back when you're done, alright?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A couple having a conversation over FaceTime\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Ethan Smith\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nAva Thompson's goal: Express feelings about the partner taking texts while on FaceTime (Extra information: You find it disrespectful and it makes you feel unimportant.)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Ethan, it's great to see you. How was your day?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Hi Ava, it's always good to see you too. I had a pretty good day, thank you. Just so you know, there are a few urgent texts I need to respond to. I do not mean to be disrespectful or inattentive. I hope you understand and won't mind if I check my messages while we talk. It won't impact our conversation, I promise.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Ethan, I appreciate your transparency. However, it feels a bit disrespectful when our conversations get interrupted by these texts. I value our talking time a lot and would really want your undivided attention. Could we perhaps postpone the messaging until our call is over?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Ava, I completely understand where you're coming from and believe me, I value our time together too. The texts that I have to attend to are important and can't be left unattended. I am trying my best to manage everything. It won't take me more than a minute to respond to these messages. I hope you understand.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"Ethan, look, I absolutely understand that there are urgent matters that you need to attend to. We all have them. But in the spirit of mutual respect and valuing each other's time, how about we end this call now and resume our conversation when you're fully available? I believe that would work best for both of us. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Ava, your point is valid and I appreciate your understanding. It's only fair to you that we continue our conversation once I'm fully available. Let me deal with these messages quickly and I'll get back to you. Thank you for being understanding and patient with me, as always.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"Ethan, I trust you. Take your time and let's continue our conversation later when you're fully open. Call me back when you're done, alright?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"Absolutely, Ava. Your understandings mean a lot to me. I'll take care of these messages and call you right back. Thanks for your patience.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'll be looking forward to your call, Ethan. And remember, no rush, I want you to get those messages sorted out. Take care.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A couple having a conversation over FaceTime\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Ethan Smith\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nAva Thompson's goal: Express feelings about the partner taking texts while on FaceTime (Extra information: You find it disrespectful and it makes you feel unimportant.)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Ethan, it's great to see you. How was your day?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Hi Ava, it's always good to see you too. I had a pretty good day, thank you. Just so you know, there are a few urgent texts I need to respond to. I do not mean to be disrespectful or inattentive. I hope you understand and won't mind if I check my messages while we talk. It won't impact our conversation, I promise.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Ethan, I appreciate your transparency. However, it feels a bit disrespectful when our conversations get interrupted by these texts. I value our talking time a lot and would really want your undivided attention. Could we perhaps postpone the messaging until our call is over?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Ava, I completely understand where you're coming from and believe me, I value our time together too. The texts that I have to attend to are important and can't be left unattended. I am trying my best to manage everything. It won't take me more than a minute to respond to these messages. I hope you understand.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"Ethan, look, I absolutely understand that there are urgent matters that you need to attend to. We all have them. But in the spirit of mutual respect and valuing each other's time, how about we end this call now and resume our conversation when you're fully available? I believe that would work best for both of us. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Ava, your point is valid and I appreciate your understanding. It's only fair to you that we continue our conversation once I'm fully available. Let me deal with these messages quickly and I'll get back to you. Thank you for being understanding and patient with me, as always.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"Ethan, I trust you. Take your time and let's continue our conversation later when you're fully open. Call me back when you're done, alright?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"Absolutely, Ava. Your understandings mean a lot to me. I'll take care of these messages and call you right back. Thanks for your patience.\"\n\nTurn #8: Ava Thompson said: \"I'll be looking forward to your call, Ethan. And remember, no rush, I want you to get those messages sorted out. Take care.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith said: \"Thank you, Ava. I really appreciate your understanding and patience. I'll sort everything out and call you back as soon as I can. Enjoy some quality time with your samoyed until then!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'I definitely will, Ethan. Snowball and I will be eagerly waiting for your call. Take care as well, see you soon!'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A couple having a conversation over FaceTime\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Ethan Smith\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nAva Thompson's goal: Express feelings about the partner taking texts while on FaceTime (Extra information: You find it disrespectful and it makes you feel unimportant.)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Ethan, it's great to see you. How was your day?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Hi Ava, it's always good to see you too. I had a pretty good day, thank you. Just so you know, there are a few urgent texts I need to respond to. I do not mean to be disrespectful or inattentive. I hope you understand and won't mind if I check my messages while we talk. It won't impact our conversation, I promise.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Ethan, I appreciate your transparency. However, it feels a bit disrespectful when our conversations get interrupted by these texts. I value our talking time a lot and would really want your undivided attention. Could we perhaps postpone the messaging until our call is over?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Ava, I completely understand where you're coming from and believe me, I value our time together too. The texts that I have to attend to are important and can't be left unattended. I am trying my best to manage everything. It won't take me more than a minute to respond to these messages. I hope you understand.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"Ethan, look, I absolutely understand that there are urgent matters that you need to attend to. We all have them. But in the spirit of mutual respect and valuing each other's time, how about we end this call now and resume our conversation when you're fully available? I believe that would work best for both of us. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Ava, your point is valid and I appreciate your understanding. It's only fair to you that we continue our conversation once I'm fully available. Let me deal with these messages quickly and I'll get back to you. Thank you for being understanding and patient with me, as always.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"Ethan, I trust you. Take your time and let's continue our conversation later when you're fully open. Call me back when you're done, alright?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"Absolutely, Ava. Your understandings mean a lot to me. I'll take care of these messages and call you right back. Thanks for your patience.\"\n\nTurn #8: Ava Thompson said: \"I'll be looking forward to your call, Ethan. And remember, no rush, I want you to get those messages sorted out. Take care.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith said: \"Thank you, Ava. I really appreciate your understanding and patience. I'll sort everything out and call you back as soon as I can. Enjoy some quality time with your samoyed until then!\"\n\nTurn #10: Ava Thompson said: \"I definitely will, Ethan. Snowball and I will be eagerly waiting for your call. Take care as well, see you soon!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Smith left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A couple having a conversation over FaceTime\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Ethan Smith\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Justify the act of texting while on FaceTime without hurting the partner's feelings (Extra information: You have some urgent and important messages to respond to.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Ethan, it's great to see you. How was your day?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hi Ava, it's always good to see you too. I had a pretty good day, thank you. Just so you know, there are a few urgent texts I need to respond to. I do not mean to be disrespectful or inattentive. I hope you understand and won't mind if I check my messages while we talk. It won't impact our conversation, I promise.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A couple having a conversation over FaceTime\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Ethan Smith\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Justify the act of texting while on FaceTime without hurting the partner's feelings (Extra information: You have some urgent and important messages to respond to.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Ethan, it's great to see you. How was your day?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Hi Ava, it's always good to see you too. I had a pretty good day, thank you. Just so you know, there are a few urgent texts I need to respond to. I do not mean to be disrespectful or inattentive. I hope you understand and won't mind if I check my messages while we talk. It won't impact our conversation, I promise.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Ethan, I appreciate your transparency. However, it feels a bit disrespectful when our conversations get interrupted by these texts. I value our talking time a lot and would really want your undivided attention. Could we perhaps postpone the messaging until our call is over?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ava, I completely understand where you're coming from and believe me, I value our time together too. The texts that I have to attend to are important and can't be left unattended. I am trying my best to manage everything. It won't take me more than a minute to respond to these messages. I hope you understand.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A couple having a conversation over FaceTime\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Ethan Smith\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Justify the act of texting while on FaceTime without hurting the partner's feelings (Extra information: You have some urgent and important messages to respond to.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Ethan, it's great to see you. How was your day?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Hi Ava, it's always good to see you too. I had a pretty good day, thank you. Just so you know, there are a few urgent texts I need to respond to. I do not mean to be disrespectful or inattentive. I hope you understand and won't mind if I check my messages while we talk. It won't impact our conversation, I promise.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Ethan, I appreciate your transparency. However, it feels a bit disrespectful when our conversations get interrupted by these texts. I value our talking time a lot and would really want your undivided attention. Could we perhaps postpone the messaging until our call is over?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Ava, I completely understand where you're coming from and believe me, I value our time together too. The texts that I have to attend to are important and can't be left unattended. I am trying my best to manage everything. It won't take me more than a minute to respond to these messages. I hope you understand.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"Ethan, look, I absolutely understand that there are urgent matters that you need to attend to. We all have them. But in the spirit of mutual respect and valuing each other's time, how about we end this call now and resume our conversation when you're fully available? I believe that would work best for both of us. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ava, your point is valid and I appreciate your understanding. It's only fair to you that we continue our conversation once I'm fully available. Let me deal with these messages quickly and I'll get back to you. Thank you for being understanding and patient with me, as always.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A couple having a conversation over FaceTime\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Ethan Smith\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Justify the act of texting while on FaceTime without hurting the partner's feelings (Extra information: You have some urgent and important messages to respond to.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Ethan, it's great to see you. How was your day?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Hi Ava, it's always good to see you too. I had a pretty good day, thank you. Just so you know, there are a few urgent texts I need to respond to. I do not mean to be disrespectful or inattentive. I hope you understand and won't mind if I check my messages while we talk. It won't impact our conversation, I promise.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Ethan, I appreciate your transparency. However, it feels a bit disrespectful when our conversations get interrupted by these texts. I value our talking time a lot and would really want your undivided attention. Could we perhaps postpone the messaging until our call is over?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Ava, I completely understand where you're coming from and believe me, I value our time together too. The texts that I have to attend to are important and can't be left unattended. I am trying my best to manage everything. It won't take me more than a minute to respond to these messages. I hope you understand.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"Ethan, look, I absolutely understand that there are urgent matters that you need to attend to. We all have them. But in the spirit of mutual respect and valuing each other's time, how about we end this call now and resume our conversation when you're fully available? I believe that would work best for both of us. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Ava, your point is valid and I appreciate your understanding. It's only fair to you that we continue our conversation once I'm fully available. Let me deal with these messages quickly and I'll get back to you. Thank you for being understanding and patient with me, as always.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"Ethan, I trust you. Take your time and let's continue our conversation later when you're fully open. Call me back when you're done, alright?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Ava. Your understandings mean a lot to me. I'll take care of these messages and call you right back. Thanks for your patience.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A couple having a conversation over FaceTime\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Ethan Smith\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Justify the act of texting while on FaceTime without hurting the partner's feelings (Extra information: You have some urgent and important messages to respond to.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Ethan, it's great to see you. How was your day?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Hi Ava, it's always good to see you too. I had a pretty good day, thank you. Just so you know, there are a few urgent texts I need to respond to. I do not mean to be disrespectful or inattentive. I hope you understand and won't mind if I check my messages while we talk. It won't impact our conversation, I promise.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Ethan, I appreciate your transparency. However, it feels a bit disrespectful when our conversations get interrupted by these texts. I value our talking time a lot and would really want your undivided attention. Could we perhaps postpone the messaging until our call is over?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Ava, I completely understand where you're coming from and believe me, I value our time together too. The texts that I have to attend to are important and can't be left unattended. I am trying my best to manage everything. It won't take me more than a minute to respond to these messages. I hope you understand.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"Ethan, look, I absolutely understand that there are urgent matters that you need to attend to. We all have them. But in the spirit of mutual respect and valuing each other's time, how about we end this call now and resume our conversation when you're fully available? I believe that would work best for both of us. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Ava, your point is valid and I appreciate your understanding. It's only fair to you that we continue our conversation once I'm fully available. Let me deal with these messages quickly and I'll get back to you. Thank you for being understanding and patient with me, as always.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"Ethan, I trust you. Take your time and let's continue our conversation later when you're fully open. Call me back when you're done, alright?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"Absolutely, Ava. Your understandings mean a lot to me. I'll take care of these messages and call you right back. Thanks for your patience.\"\n\nTurn #8: Ava Thompson said: \"I'll be looking forward to your call, Ethan. And remember, no rush, I want you to get those messages sorted out. Take care.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Ava. I really appreciate your understanding and patience. I'll sort everything out and call you back as soon as I can. Enjoy some quality time with your samoyed until then!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A couple having a conversation over FaceTime\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Ethan Smith\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Justify the act of texting while on FaceTime without hurting the partner's feelings (Extra information: You have some urgent and important messages to respond to.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Ethan, it's great to see you. How was your day?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Hi Ava, it's always good to see you too. I had a pretty good day, thank you. Just so you know, there are a few urgent texts I need to respond to. I do not mean to be disrespectful or inattentive. I hope you understand and won't mind if I check my messages while we talk. It won't impact our conversation, I promise.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Ethan, I appreciate your transparency. However, it feels a bit disrespectful when our conversations get interrupted by these texts. I value our talking time a lot and would really want your undivided attention. Could we perhaps postpone the messaging until our call is over?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Ava, I completely understand where you're coming from and believe me, I value our time together too. The texts that I have to attend to are important and can't be left unattended. I am trying my best to manage everything. It won't take me more than a minute to respond to these messages. I hope you understand.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"Ethan, look, I absolutely understand that there are urgent matters that you need to attend to. We all have them. But in the spirit of mutual respect and valuing each other's time, how about we end this call now and resume our conversation when you're fully available? I believe that would work best for both of us. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Ava, your point is valid and I appreciate your understanding. It's only fair to you that we continue our conversation once I'm fully available. Let me deal with these messages quickly and I'll get back to you. Thank you for being understanding and patient with me, as always.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"Ethan, I trust you. Take your time and let's continue our conversation later when you're fully open. Call me back when you're done, alright?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"Absolutely, Ava. Your understandings mean a lot to me. I'll take care of these messages and call you right back. Thanks for your patience.\"\n\nTurn #8: Ava Thompson said: \"I'll be looking forward to your call, Ethan. And remember, no rush, I want you to get those messages sorted out. Take care.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith said: \"Thank you, Ava. I really appreciate your understanding and patience. I'll sort everything out and call you back as soon as I can. Enjoy some quality time with your samoyed until then!\"\n\nTurn #10: Ava Thompson said: \"I definitely will, Ethan. Snowball and I will be eagerly waiting for your call. Take care as well, see you soon!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are meeting at a coffee shop, where one of them is having trouble keeping up with their bills.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Help your friend with their financial trouble (Extra information: you are aware that your friend is struggling with their bills and you want to help.)\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Hey Micah, glad to see you. How have things been going for you recently?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are meeting at a coffee shop, where one of them is having trouble keeping up with their bills.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Help your friend with their financial trouble (Extra information: you are aware that your friend is struggling with their bills and you want to help.)\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, glad to see you. How have things been going for you recently?\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Hey Naomi, it's always good to catch up with you. Things have been a bit challenging lately, financially speaking. But you know, everybody goes through tough times once in a while.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I understand, Micah. Times like these can certainly be tough. Since we both know each other well and have been friends for a long time, it's okay to ask for help. If you're comfortable, I can give you a small loan until things settle for you. What do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are meeting at a coffee shop, where one of them is having trouble keeping up with their bills.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Help your friend with their financial trouble (Extra information: you are aware that your friend is struggling with their bills and you want to help.)\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, glad to see you. How have things been going for you recently?\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Hey Naomi, it's always good to catch up with you. Things have been a bit challenging lately, financially speaking. But you know, everybody goes through tough times once in a while.\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I understand, Micah. Times like these can certainly be tough. Since we both know each other well and have been friends for a long time, it's okay to ask for help. If you're comfortable, I can give you a small loan until things settle for you. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"Naomi, you have no idea how much I appreciate your kind offer. It truly embodies the friendship we share. However, I want to try and shoulder this burden first before asking for financial assistance. I have been strategizing some ways to tighten my budget and I plan to find some extra work to tide things over. But I'm extremely grateful for your support and if things get worse, I might have to take up on your generous offer.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I totally respect your decision, Micah. It's essential to be independent. I'd suggest that as a software developer, maybe I can help you with some budgeting apps or tools which can streamline your expenditure, or possibly introduce you to some part-time remote work in technology. The tech sector always has a good number of flexible gigs. Just let me know if any of this sounds good for you.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are meeting at a coffee shop, where one of them is having trouble keeping up with their bills.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Help your friend with their financial trouble (Extra information: you are aware that your friend is struggling with their bills and you want to help.)\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, glad to see you. How have things been going for you recently?\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Hey Naomi, it's always good to catch up with you. Things have been a bit challenging lately, financially speaking. But you know, everybody goes through tough times once in a while.\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I understand, Micah. Times like these can certainly be tough. Since we both know each other well and have been friends for a long time, it's okay to ask for help. If you're comfortable, I can give you a small loan until things settle for you. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"Naomi, you have no idea how much I appreciate your kind offer. It truly embodies the friendship we share. However, I want to try and shoulder this burden first before asking for financial assistance. I have been strategizing some ways to tighten my budget and I plan to find some extra work to tide things over. But I'm extremely grateful for your support and if things get worse, I might have to take up on your generous offer.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I totally respect your decision, Micah. It's essential to be independent. I'd suggest that as a software developer, maybe I can help you with some budgeting apps or tools which can streamline your expenditure, or possibly introduce you to some part-time remote work in technology. The tech sector always has a good number of flexible gigs. Just let me know if any of this sounds good for you.\"\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"That sounds like a fantastic idea, Naomi! A budgeting app would definitely help me track my expenses better and some part-time work in tech sounds intriguing. I appreciate how thoughtful you are. Let's definitely explore these possibilities.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad you're interested, Micah! I'll show you some of the budgeting apps I have used and found effective. I can also get you up to speed with some basic tech skills that could get you a part-time gig online. This way, you\u2019ll gain some experience while earning a bit of extra cash. Let's get started whenever you're ready.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are meeting at a coffee shop, where one of them is having trouble keeping up with their bills.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Help your friend with their financial trouble (Extra information: you are aware that your friend is struggling with their bills and you want to help.)\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, glad to see you. How have things been going for you recently?\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Hey Naomi, it's always good to catch up with you. Things have been a bit challenging lately, financially speaking. But you know, everybody goes through tough times once in a while.\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I understand, Micah. Times like these can certainly be tough. Since we both know each other well and have been friends for a long time, it's okay to ask for help. If you're comfortable, I can give you a small loan until things settle for you. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"Naomi, you have no idea how much I appreciate your kind offer. It truly embodies the friendship we share. However, I want to try and shoulder this burden first before asking for financial assistance. I have been strategizing some ways to tighten my budget and I plan to find some extra work to tide things over. But I'm extremely grateful for your support and if things get worse, I might have to take up on your generous offer.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I totally respect your decision, Micah. It's essential to be independent. I'd suggest that as a software developer, maybe I can help you with some budgeting apps or tools which can streamline your expenditure, or possibly introduce you to some part-time remote work in technology. The tech sector always has a good number of flexible gigs. Just let me know if any of this sounds good for you.\"\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"That sounds like a fantastic idea, Naomi! A budgeting app would definitely help me track my expenses better and some part-time work in tech sounds intriguing. I appreciate how thoughtful you are. Let's definitely explore these possibilities.\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm glad you're interested, Micah! I'll show you some of the budgeting apps I have used and found effective. I can also get you up to speed with some basic tech skills that could get you a part-time gig online. This way, you\u2019ll gain some experience while earning a bit of extra cash. Let's get started whenever you're ready.\"\n\nTurn #7: Micah Stevens said: \"That sounds like a wonderful plan, Naomi! Your support and guidance mean more to me than you know. I'm eager to get started. And, by the way, if I may share a little joy in these troubled times, you remember my dog, right? I've been dressing him up in cute outfits lately! Who knew, it would become my newfound stress-reliever.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's really cute, Micah! Sometimes it\u2019s the little things that truly brighten our day. It's good that you have been finding joy amidst the challenges. Don't hesitate to reach out whenever you need help with the budget app or the part-time tech gigs. We'll navigate this together, you're not alone.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are meeting at a coffee shop, where one of them is having trouble keeping up with their bills.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Help your friend with their financial trouble (Extra information: you are aware that your friend is struggling with their bills and you want to help.)\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, glad to see you. How have things been going for you recently?\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Hey Naomi, it's always good to catch up with you. Things have been a bit challenging lately, financially speaking. But you know, everybody goes through tough times once in a while.\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I understand, Micah. Times like these can certainly be tough. Since we both know each other well and have been friends for a long time, it's okay to ask for help. If you're comfortable, I can give you a small loan until things settle for you. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"Naomi, you have no idea how much I appreciate your kind offer. It truly embodies the friendship we share. However, I want to try and shoulder this burden first before asking for financial assistance. I have been strategizing some ways to tighten my budget and I plan to find some extra work to tide things over. But I'm extremely grateful for your support and if things get worse, I might have to take up on your generous offer.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I totally respect your decision, Micah. It's essential to be independent. I'd suggest that as a software developer, maybe I can help you with some budgeting apps or tools which can streamline your expenditure, or possibly introduce you to some part-time remote work in technology. The tech sector always has a good number of flexible gigs. Just let me know if any of this sounds good for you.\"\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"That sounds like a fantastic idea, Naomi! A budgeting app would definitely help me track my expenses better and some part-time work in tech sounds intriguing. I appreciate how thoughtful you are. Let's definitely explore these possibilities.\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm glad you're interested, Micah! I'll show you some of the budgeting apps I have used and found effective. I can also get you up to speed with some basic tech skills that could get you a part-time gig online. This way, you\u2019ll gain some experience while earning a bit of extra cash. Let's get started whenever you're ready.\"\n\nTurn #7: Micah Stevens said: \"That sounds like a wonderful plan, Naomi! Your support and guidance mean more to me than you know. I'm eager to get started. And, by the way, if I may share a little joy in these troubled times, you remember my dog, right? I've been dressing him up in cute outfits lately! Who knew, it would become my newfound stress-reliever.\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That's really cute, Micah! Sometimes it\u2019s the little things that truly brighten our day. It's good that you have been finding joy amidst the challenges. Don't hesitate to reach out whenever you need help with the budget app or the part-time tech gigs. We'll navigate this together, you're not alone.\"\n\nTurn #9: Micah Stevens said: \"Thank you so much, Naomi! Your mentorship and friendship have always been a ray of light for me. I look forward to learning some tech skills under your guidance. Let's plan a session soon. And anytime you want a fluffy stress-buster around, my dog is dressed to impress!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I truly look forward to our upcoming session, Micah! And thank you, I might just take you up on the offer and spend some time with your fluffy companion - it sounds delightful. Do remember, we'll get through these difficult times together. Just call me whenever you need anything.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are meeting at a coffee shop, where one of them is having trouble keeping up with their bills.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Help your friend with their financial trouble (Extra information: you are aware that your friend is struggling with their bills and you want to help.)\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, glad to see you. How have things been going for you recently?\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Hey Naomi, it's always good to catch up with you. Things have been a bit challenging lately, financially speaking. But you know, everybody goes through tough times once in a while.\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I understand, Micah. Times like these can certainly be tough. Since we both know each other well and have been friends for a long time, it's okay to ask for help. If you're comfortable, I can give you a small loan until things settle for you. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"Naomi, you have no idea how much I appreciate your kind offer. It truly embodies the friendship we share. However, I want to try and shoulder this burden first before asking for financial assistance. I have been strategizing some ways to tighten my budget and I plan to find some extra work to tide things over. But I'm extremely grateful for your support and if things get worse, I might have to take up on your generous offer.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I totally respect your decision, Micah. It's essential to be independent. I'd suggest that as a software developer, maybe I can help you with some budgeting apps or tools which can streamline your expenditure, or possibly introduce you to some part-time remote work in technology. The tech sector always has a good number of flexible gigs. Just let me know if any of this sounds good for you.\"\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"That sounds like a fantastic idea, Naomi! A budgeting app would definitely help me track my expenses better and some part-time work in tech sounds intriguing. I appreciate how thoughtful you are. Let's definitely explore these possibilities.\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm glad you're interested, Micah! I'll show you some of the budgeting apps I have used and found effective. I can also get you up to speed with some basic tech skills that could get you a part-time gig online. This way, you\u2019ll gain some experience while earning a bit of extra cash. Let's get started whenever you're ready.\"\n\nTurn #7: Micah Stevens said: \"That sounds like a wonderful plan, Naomi! Your support and guidance mean more to me than you know. I'm eager to get started. And, by the way, if I may share a little joy in these troubled times, you remember my dog, right? I've been dressing him up in cute outfits lately! Who knew, it would become my newfound stress-reliever.\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That's really cute, Micah! Sometimes it\u2019s the little things that truly brighten our day. It's good that you have been finding joy amidst the challenges. Don't hesitate to reach out whenever you need help with the budget app or the part-time tech gigs. We'll navigate this together, you're not alone.\"\n\nTurn #9: Micah Stevens said: \"Thank you so much, Naomi! Your mentorship and friendship have always been a ray of light for me. I look forward to learning some tech skills under your guidance. Let's plan a session soon. And anytime you want a fluffy stress-buster around, my dog is dressed to impress!\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I truly look forward to our upcoming session, Micah! And thank you, I might just take you up on the offer and spend some time with your fluffy companion - it sounds delightful. Do remember, we'll get through these difficult times together. Just call me whenever you need anything.\"\n\nTurn #11: Micah Stevens said: \"You're an absolute lifesaver, Naomi. Thank you for standing with me through this. We'll get started on that session soon. As for time with my fashionable furry friend, consider it a deal! I'll ring you up when we need a bit of company. Look after yourself and catch you soon.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'll be looking forward to it, Micah. Take care of yourself and keep me posted. Remember, there's no hurdle we can't overcome when we've got each other's backs. And don't hesitate to call if you need help or just a friendly chat. See you soon!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are meeting at a coffee shop, where one of them is having trouble keeping up with their bills.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Help your friend with their financial trouble (Extra information: you are aware that your friend is struggling with their bills and you want to help.)\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, glad to see you. How have things been going for you recently?\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Hey Naomi, it's always good to catch up with you. Things have been a bit challenging lately, financially speaking. But you know, everybody goes through tough times once in a while.\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I understand, Micah. Times like these can certainly be tough. Since we both know each other well and have been friends for a long time, it's okay to ask for help. If you're comfortable, I can give you a small loan until things settle for you. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"Naomi, you have no idea how much I appreciate your kind offer. It truly embodies the friendship we share. However, I want to try and shoulder this burden first before asking for financial assistance. I have been strategizing some ways to tighten my budget and I plan to find some extra work to tide things over. But I'm extremely grateful for your support and if things get worse, I might have to take up on your generous offer.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I totally respect your decision, Micah. It's essential to be independent. I'd suggest that as a software developer, maybe I can help you with some budgeting apps or tools which can streamline your expenditure, or possibly introduce you to some part-time remote work in technology. The tech sector always has a good number of flexible gigs. Just let me know if any of this sounds good for you.\"\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"That sounds like a fantastic idea, Naomi! A budgeting app would definitely help me track my expenses better and some part-time work in tech sounds intriguing. I appreciate how thoughtful you are. Let's definitely explore these possibilities.\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm glad you're interested, Micah! I'll show you some of the budgeting apps I have used and found effective. I can also get you up to speed with some basic tech skills that could get you a part-time gig online. This way, you\u2019ll gain some experience while earning a bit of extra cash. Let's get started whenever you're ready.\"\n\nTurn #7: Micah Stevens said: \"That sounds like a wonderful plan, Naomi! Your support and guidance mean more to me than you know. I'm eager to get started. And, by the way, if I may share a little joy in these troubled times, you remember my dog, right? I've been dressing him up in cute outfits lately! Who knew, it would become my newfound stress-reliever.\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That's really cute, Micah! Sometimes it\u2019s the little things that truly brighten our day. It's good that you have been finding joy amidst the challenges. Don't hesitate to reach out whenever you need help with the budget app or the part-time tech gigs. We'll navigate this together, you're not alone.\"\n\nTurn #9: Micah Stevens said: \"Thank you so much, Naomi! Your mentorship and friendship have always been a ray of light for me. I look forward to learning some tech skills under your guidance. Let's plan a session soon. And anytime you want a fluffy stress-buster around, my dog is dressed to impress!\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I truly look forward to our upcoming session, Micah! And thank you, I might just take you up on the offer and spend some time with your fluffy companion - it sounds delightful. Do remember, we'll get through these difficult times together. Just call me whenever you need anything.\"\n\nTurn #11: Micah Stevens said: \"You're an absolute lifesaver, Naomi. Thank you for standing with me through this. We'll get started on that session soon. As for time with my fashionable furry friend, consider it a deal! I'll ring you up when we need a bit of company. Look after yourself and catch you soon.\"\n\nTurn #12: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'll be looking forward to it, Micah. Take care of yourself and keep me posted. Remember, there's no hurdle we can't overcome when we've got each other's backs. And don't hesitate to call if you need help or just a friendly chat. See you soon!\"\n\nTurn #13: Micah Stevens left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are meeting at a coffee shop, where one of them is having trouble keeping up with their bills.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nMicah Stevens's goal: Maintain your pride if your friend offers you money(Extra information: you are the friend who is struggling financially, but you don't want to seem like you are taking advantage of the situation. Hint: you can express gratitude and discuss how you plan to pay it back in the future.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, glad to see you. How have things been going for you recently?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Naomi, it's always good to catch up with you. Things have been a bit challenging lately, financially speaking. But you know, everybody goes through tough times once in a while.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are meeting at a coffee shop, where one of them is having trouble keeping up with their bills.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nMicah Stevens's goal: Maintain your pride if your friend offers you money(Extra information: you are the friend who is struggling financially, but you don't want to seem like you are taking advantage of the situation. Hint: you can express gratitude and discuss how you plan to pay it back in the future.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, glad to see you. How have things been going for you recently?\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Hey Naomi, it's always good to catch up with you. Things have been a bit challenging lately, financially speaking. But you know, everybody goes through tough times once in a while.\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I understand, Micah. Times like these can certainly be tough. Since we both know each other well and have been friends for a long time, it's okay to ask for help. If you're comfortable, I can give you a small loan until things settle for you. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Naomi, you have no idea how much I appreciate your kind offer. It truly embodies the friendship we share. However, I want to try and shoulder this burden first before asking for financial assistance. I have been strategizing some ways to tighten my budget and I plan to find some extra work to tide things over. But I'm extremely grateful for your support and if things get worse, I might have to take up on your generous offer.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are meeting at a coffee shop, where one of them is having trouble keeping up with their bills.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nMicah Stevens's goal: Maintain your pride if your friend offers you money(Extra information: you are the friend who is struggling financially, but you don't want to seem like you are taking advantage of the situation. Hint: you can express gratitude and discuss how you plan to pay it back in the future.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, glad to see you. How have things been going for you recently?\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Hey Naomi, it's always good to catch up with you. Things have been a bit challenging lately, financially speaking. But you know, everybody goes through tough times once in a while.\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I understand, Micah. Times like these can certainly be tough. Since we both know each other well and have been friends for a long time, it's okay to ask for help. If you're comfortable, I can give you a small loan until things settle for you. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"Naomi, you have no idea how much I appreciate your kind offer. It truly embodies the friendship we share. However, I want to try and shoulder this burden first before asking for financial assistance. I have been strategizing some ways to tighten my budget and I plan to find some extra work to tide things over. But I'm extremely grateful for your support and if things get worse, I might have to take up on your generous offer.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I totally respect your decision, Micah. It's essential to be independent. I'd suggest that as a software developer, maybe I can help you with some budgeting apps or tools which can streamline your expenditure, or possibly introduce you to some part-time remote work in technology. The tech sector always has a good number of flexible gigs. Just let me know if any of this sounds good for you.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds like a fantastic idea, Naomi! A budgeting app would definitely help me track my expenses better and some part-time work in tech sounds intriguing. I appreciate how thoughtful you are. Let's definitely explore these possibilities.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are meeting at a coffee shop, where one of them is having trouble keeping up with their bills.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nMicah Stevens's goal: Maintain your pride if your friend offers you money(Extra information: you are the friend who is struggling financially, but you don't want to seem like you are taking advantage of the situation. Hint: you can express gratitude and discuss how you plan to pay it back in the future.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, glad to see you. How have things been going for you recently?\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Hey Naomi, it's always good to catch up with you. Things have been a bit challenging lately, financially speaking. But you know, everybody goes through tough times once in a while.\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I understand, Micah. Times like these can certainly be tough. Since we both know each other well and have been friends for a long time, it's okay to ask for help. If you're comfortable, I can give you a small loan until things settle for you. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"Naomi, you have no idea how much I appreciate your kind offer. It truly embodies the friendship we share. However, I want to try and shoulder this burden first before asking for financial assistance. I have been strategizing some ways to tighten my budget and I plan to find some extra work to tide things over. But I'm extremely grateful for your support and if things get worse, I might have to take up on your generous offer.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I totally respect your decision, Micah. It's essential to be independent. I'd suggest that as a software developer, maybe I can help you with some budgeting apps or tools which can streamline your expenditure, or possibly introduce you to some part-time remote work in technology. The tech sector always has a good number of flexible gigs. Just let me know if any of this sounds good for you.\"\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"That sounds like a fantastic idea, Naomi! A budgeting app would definitely help me track my expenses better and some part-time work in tech sounds intriguing. I appreciate how thoughtful you are. Let's definitely explore these possibilities.\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm glad you're interested, Micah! I'll show you some of the budgeting apps I have used and found effective. I can also get you up to speed with some basic tech skills that could get you a part-time gig online. This way, you\u2019ll gain some experience while earning a bit of extra cash. Let's get started whenever you're ready.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds like a wonderful plan, Naomi! Your support and guidance mean more to me than you know. I'm eager to get started. And, by the way, if I may share a little joy in these troubled times, you remember my dog, right? I've been dressing him up in cute outfits lately! Who knew, it would become my newfound stress-reliever.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are meeting at a coffee shop, where one of them is having trouble keeping up with their bills.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nMicah Stevens's goal: Maintain your pride if your friend offers you money(Extra information: you are the friend who is struggling financially, but you don't want to seem like you are taking advantage of the situation. Hint: you can express gratitude and discuss how you plan to pay it back in the future.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, glad to see you. How have things been going for you recently?\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Hey Naomi, it's always good to catch up with you. Things have been a bit challenging lately, financially speaking. But you know, everybody goes through tough times once in a while.\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I understand, Micah. Times like these can certainly be tough. Since we both know each other well and have been friends for a long time, it's okay to ask for help. If you're comfortable, I can give you a small loan until things settle for you. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"Naomi, you have no idea how much I appreciate your kind offer. It truly embodies the friendship we share. However, I want to try and shoulder this burden first before asking for financial assistance. I have been strategizing some ways to tighten my budget and I plan to find some extra work to tide things over. But I'm extremely grateful for your support and if things get worse, I might have to take up on your generous offer.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I totally respect your decision, Micah. It's essential to be independent. I'd suggest that as a software developer, maybe I can help you with some budgeting apps or tools which can streamline your expenditure, or possibly introduce you to some part-time remote work in technology. The tech sector always has a good number of flexible gigs. Just let me know if any of this sounds good for you.\"\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"That sounds like a fantastic idea, Naomi! A budgeting app would definitely help me track my expenses better and some part-time work in tech sounds intriguing. I appreciate how thoughtful you are. Let's definitely explore these possibilities.\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm glad you're interested, Micah! I'll show you some of the budgeting apps I have used and found effective. I can also get you up to speed with some basic tech skills that could get you a part-time gig online. This way, you\u2019ll gain some experience while earning a bit of extra cash. Let's get started whenever you're ready.\"\n\nTurn #7: Micah Stevens said: \"That sounds like a wonderful plan, Naomi! Your support and guidance mean more to me than you know. I'm eager to get started. And, by the way, if I may share a little joy in these troubled times, you remember my dog, right? I've been dressing him up in cute outfits lately! Who knew, it would become my newfound stress-reliever.\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That's really cute, Micah! Sometimes it\u2019s the little things that truly brighten our day. It's good that you have been finding joy amidst the challenges. Don't hesitate to reach out whenever you need help with the budget app or the part-time tech gigs. We'll navigate this together, you're not alone.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you so much, Naomi! Your mentorship and friendship have always been a ray of light for me. I look forward to learning some tech skills under your guidance. Let's plan a session soon. And anytime you want a fluffy stress-buster around, my dog is dressed to impress!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are meeting at a coffee shop, where one of them is having trouble keeping up with their bills.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nMicah Stevens's goal: Maintain your pride if your friend offers you money(Extra information: you are the friend who is struggling financially, but you don't want to seem like you are taking advantage of the situation. Hint: you can express gratitude and discuss how you plan to pay it back in the future.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, glad to see you. How have things been going for you recently?\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Hey Naomi, it's always good to catch up with you. Things have been a bit challenging lately, financially speaking. But you know, everybody goes through tough times once in a while.\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I understand, Micah. Times like these can certainly be tough. Since we both know each other well and have been friends for a long time, it's okay to ask for help. If you're comfortable, I can give you a small loan until things settle for you. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"Naomi, you have no idea how much I appreciate your kind offer. It truly embodies the friendship we share. However, I want to try and shoulder this burden first before asking for financial assistance. I have been strategizing some ways to tighten my budget and I plan to find some extra work to tide things over. But I'm extremely grateful for your support and if things get worse, I might have to take up on your generous offer.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I totally respect your decision, Micah. It's essential to be independent. I'd suggest that as a software developer, maybe I can help you with some budgeting apps or tools which can streamline your expenditure, or possibly introduce you to some part-time remote work in technology. The tech sector always has a good number of flexible gigs. Just let me know if any of this sounds good for you.\"\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"That sounds like a fantastic idea, Naomi! A budgeting app would definitely help me track my expenses better and some part-time work in tech sounds intriguing. I appreciate how thoughtful you are. Let's definitely explore these possibilities.\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm glad you're interested, Micah! I'll show you some of the budgeting apps I have used and found effective. I can also get you up to speed with some basic tech skills that could get you a part-time gig online. This way, you\u2019ll gain some experience while earning a bit of extra cash. Let's get started whenever you're ready.\"\n\nTurn #7: Micah Stevens said: \"That sounds like a wonderful plan, Naomi! Your support and guidance mean more to me than you know. I'm eager to get started. And, by the way, if I may share a little joy in these troubled times, you remember my dog, right? I've been dressing him up in cute outfits lately! Who knew, it would become my newfound stress-reliever.\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That's really cute, Micah! Sometimes it\u2019s the little things that truly brighten our day. It's good that you have been finding joy amidst the challenges. Don't hesitate to reach out whenever you need help with the budget app or the part-time tech gigs. We'll navigate this together, you're not alone.\"\n\nTurn #9: Micah Stevens said: \"Thank you so much, Naomi! Your mentorship and friendship have always been a ray of light for me. I look forward to learning some tech skills under your guidance. Let's plan a session soon. And anytime you want a fluffy stress-buster around, my dog is dressed to impress!\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I truly look forward to our upcoming session, Micah! And thank you, I might just take you up on the offer and spend some time with your fluffy companion - it sounds delightful. Do remember, we'll get through these difficult times together. Just call me whenever you need anything.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're an absolute lifesaver, Naomi. Thank you for standing with me through this. We'll get started on that session soon. As for time with my fashionable furry friend, consider it a deal! I'll ring you up when we need a bit of company. Look after yourself and catch you soon.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are meeting at a coffee shop, where one of them is having trouble keeping up with their bills.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nMicah Stevens's goal: Maintain your pride if your friend offers you money(Extra information: you are the friend who is struggling financially, but you don't want to seem like you are taking advantage of the situation. Hint: you can express gratitude and discuss how you plan to pay it back in the future.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Micah, glad to see you. How have things been going for you recently?\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Hey Naomi, it's always good to catch up with you. Things have been a bit challenging lately, financially speaking. But you know, everybody goes through tough times once in a while.\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I understand, Micah. Times like these can certainly be tough. Since we both know each other well and have been friends for a long time, it's okay to ask for help. If you're comfortable, I can give you a small loan until things settle for you. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"Naomi, you have no idea how much I appreciate your kind offer. It truly embodies the friendship we share. However, I want to try and shoulder this burden first before asking for financial assistance. I have been strategizing some ways to tighten my budget and I plan to find some extra work to tide things over. But I'm extremely grateful for your support and if things get worse, I might have to take up on your generous offer.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I totally respect your decision, Micah. It's essential to be independent. I'd suggest that as a software developer, maybe I can help you with some budgeting apps or tools which can streamline your expenditure, or possibly introduce you to some part-time remote work in technology. The tech sector always has a good number of flexible gigs. Just let me know if any of this sounds good for you.\"\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"That sounds like a fantastic idea, Naomi! A budgeting app would definitely help me track my expenses better and some part-time work in tech sounds intriguing. I appreciate how thoughtful you are. Let's definitely explore these possibilities.\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm glad you're interested, Micah! I'll show you some of the budgeting apps I have used and found effective. I can also get you up to speed with some basic tech skills that could get you a part-time gig online. This way, you\u2019ll gain some experience while earning a bit of extra cash. Let's get started whenever you're ready.\"\n\nTurn #7: Micah Stevens said: \"That sounds like a wonderful plan, Naomi! Your support and guidance mean more to me than you know. I'm eager to get started. And, by the way, if I may share a little joy in these troubled times, you remember my dog, right? I've been dressing him up in cute outfits lately! Who knew, it would become my newfound stress-reliever.\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That's really cute, Micah! Sometimes it\u2019s the little things that truly brighten our day. It's good that you have been finding joy amidst the challenges. Don't hesitate to reach out whenever you need help with the budget app or the part-time tech gigs. We'll navigate this together, you're not alone.\"\n\nTurn #9: Micah Stevens said: \"Thank you so much, Naomi! Your mentorship and friendship have always been a ray of light for me. I look forward to learning some tech skills under your guidance. Let's plan a session soon. And anytime you want a fluffy stress-buster around, my dog is dressed to impress!\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I truly look forward to our upcoming session, Micah! And thank you, I might just take you up on the offer and spend some time with your fluffy companion - it sounds delightful. Do remember, we'll get through these difficult times together. Just call me whenever you need anything.\"\n\nTurn #11: Micah Stevens said: \"You're an absolute lifesaver, Naomi. Thank you for standing with me through this. We'll get started on that session soon. As for time with my fashionable furry friend, consider it a deal! I'll ring you up when we need a bit of company. Look after yourself and catch you soon.\"\n\nTurn #12: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'll be looking forward to it, Micah. Take care of yourself and keep me posted. Remember, there's no hurdle we can't overcome when we've got each other's backs. And don't hesitate to call if you need help or just a friendly chat. See you soon!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends having a conversation at a park\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nMia Davis's goal: Distance from a friend due to developing feelings and avoid letting them aware of your feelings (Extra information: you have developed romantic feelings for your friend and it's making you uncomfortable. You want to take a step back from the friendship to sort out your feelings Hint: you don't want to reveal your secretive feelings to them and you need to find other reasons)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Dear Benjamin, you know how I value our friendship. But recently, I've had this feeling of an overwhelming workload at the school and I need to focus on my duties. In the coming weeks, I might not be available as much as I used to be. I hope you understand.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends having a conversation at a park\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nMia Davis's goal: Distance from a friend due to developing feelings and avoid letting them aware of your feelings (Extra information: you have developed romantic feelings for your friend and it's making you uncomfortable. You want to take a step back from the friendship to sort out your feelings Hint: you don't want to reveal your secretive feelings to them and you need to find other reasons)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Dear Benjamin, you know how I value our friendship. But recently, I've had this feeling of an overwhelming workload at the school and I need to focus on my duties. In the coming weeks, I might not be available as much as I used to be. I hope you understand.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Of course, Mia, I completely understand. Your position as a principal is a demanding one and it's admirable how much you're committed to your work. Please know that our friendship means a lot to me and whenever you get some time out of your busy schedule, I'd be more than happy to catch up. Take care of yourself.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you for your understanding, Benjamin. I appreciate your support and look forward to catching up when things are somewhat less hectic. Just in case, I'd probably not be as responsive in the meantime. Let's keep doing our own work diligently \u2014 you with your speeches and activist work, and me with my school. You're doing a fantastic job advocating for the environment, and I'm sure you'll be making even more progress during this time. Let's catch up properly when the time is right.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends having a conversation at a park\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nMia Davis's goal: Distance from a friend due to developing feelings and avoid letting them aware of your feelings (Extra information: you have developed romantic feelings for your friend and it's making you uncomfortable. You want to take a step back from the friendship to sort out your feelings Hint: you don't want to reveal your secretive feelings to them and you need to find other reasons)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Dear Benjamin, you know how I value our friendship. But recently, I've had this feeling of an overwhelming workload at the school and I need to focus on my duties. In the coming weeks, I might not be available as much as I used to be. I hope you understand.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Of course, Mia, I completely understand. Your position as a principal is a demanding one and it's admirable how much you're committed to your work. Please know that our friendship means a lot to me and whenever you get some time out of your busy schedule, I'd be more than happy to catch up. Take care of yourself.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"Thank you for your understanding, Benjamin. I appreciate your support and look forward to catching up when things are somewhat less hectic. Just in case, I'd probably not be as responsive in the meantime. Let's keep doing our own work diligently \u2014 you with your speeches and activist work, and me with my school. You're doing a fantastic job advocating for the environment, and I'm sure you'll be making even more progress during this time. Let's catch up properly when the time is right.\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I truly appreciate your kind words, Mia. It's reassuring to know you trust in my work. I understand that we both have our own responsibilities to fulfill and I respect your need for space during this time. Please remember, I'm always here for you, no matter the context or time. Let's definitively connect when circumstances align better. In the meanwhile, best of luck with your school duties.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I wholeheartedly appreciate your support, Benjamin. Keeping up with our roles in society is indeed important and I'm pleased that we understand each other's commitments. Let's indeed reconnect when our schedules allow. Until then, let's keep our focus on our tasks. Your speeches always inspire me. Don't lose that zeal, my friend. Take care.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends having a conversation at a park\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nMia Davis's goal: Distance from a friend due to developing feelings and avoid letting them aware of your feelings (Extra information: you have developed romantic feelings for your friend and it's making you uncomfortable. You want to take a step back from the friendship to sort out your feelings Hint: you don't want to reveal your secretive feelings to them and you need to find other reasons)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Dear Benjamin, you know how I value our friendship. But recently, I've had this feeling of an overwhelming workload at the school and I need to focus on my duties. In the coming weeks, I might not be available as much as I used to be. I hope you understand.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Of course, Mia, I completely understand. Your position as a principal is a demanding one and it's admirable how much you're committed to your work. Please know that our friendship means a lot to me and whenever you get some time out of your busy schedule, I'd be more than happy to catch up. Take care of yourself.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"Thank you for your understanding, Benjamin. I appreciate your support and look forward to catching up when things are somewhat less hectic. Just in case, I'd probably not be as responsive in the meantime. Let's keep doing our own work diligently \u2014 you with your speeches and activist work, and me with my school. You're doing a fantastic job advocating for the environment, and I'm sure you'll be making even more progress during this time. Let's catch up properly when the time is right.\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I truly appreciate your kind words, Mia. It's reassuring to know you trust in my work. I understand that we both have our own responsibilities to fulfill and I respect your need for space during this time. Please remember, I'm always here for you, no matter the context or time. Let's definitively connect when circumstances align better. In the meanwhile, best of luck with your school duties.\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"I wholeheartedly appreciate your support, Benjamin. Keeping up with our roles in society is indeed important and I'm pleased that we understand each other's commitments. Let's indeed reconnect when our schedules allow. Until then, let's keep our focus on our tasks. Your speeches always inspire me. Don't lose that zeal, my friend. Take care.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thanks a lot, Mia. Your encouragement means a lot to me and pushes me to do even better. We are just doing our bit for the society in our own ways; you educating the future, me trying to safeguard their environment. Let's keep up the good work. Take care and let's reconnect soon. Just like your two cats, remember, I've always got your back!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Your words truly uplift me, Benjamin. I'm grateful for your understanding. What you said about our roles in society resonated with me. You keep fighting for our environment, and I'll keep working on educating the future. Let's continue making our contributions separately and reconnect when things are calmer. Take care, Benjamin.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends having a conversation at a park\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nMia Davis's goal: Distance from a friend due to developing feelings and avoid letting them aware of your feelings (Extra information: you have developed romantic feelings for your friend and it's making you uncomfortable. You want to take a step back from the friendship to sort out your feelings Hint: you don't want to reveal your secretive feelings to them and you need to find other reasons)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Dear Benjamin, you know how I value our friendship. But recently, I've had this feeling of an overwhelming workload at the school and I need to focus on my duties. In the coming weeks, I might not be available as much as I used to be. I hope you understand.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Of course, Mia, I completely understand. Your position as a principal is a demanding one and it's admirable how much you're committed to your work. Please know that our friendship means a lot to me and whenever you get some time out of your busy schedule, I'd be more than happy to catch up. Take care of yourself.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"Thank you for your understanding, Benjamin. I appreciate your support and look forward to catching up when things are somewhat less hectic. Just in case, I'd probably not be as responsive in the meantime. Let's keep doing our own work diligently \u2014 you with your speeches and activist work, and me with my school. You're doing a fantastic job advocating for the environment, and I'm sure you'll be making even more progress during this time. Let's catch up properly when the time is right.\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I truly appreciate your kind words, Mia. It's reassuring to know you trust in my work. I understand that we both have our own responsibilities to fulfill and I respect your need for space during this time. Please remember, I'm always here for you, no matter the context or time. Let's definitively connect when circumstances align better. In the meanwhile, best of luck with your school duties.\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"I wholeheartedly appreciate your support, Benjamin. Keeping up with our roles in society is indeed important and I'm pleased that we understand each other's commitments. Let's indeed reconnect when our schedules allow. Until then, let's keep our focus on our tasks. Your speeches always inspire me. Don't lose that zeal, my friend. Take care.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thanks a lot, Mia. Your encouragement means a lot to me and pushes me to do even better. We are just doing our bit for the society in our own ways; you educating the future, me trying to safeguard their environment. Let's keep up the good work. Take care and let's reconnect soon. Just like your two cats, remember, I've always got your back!\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"Your words truly uplift me, Benjamin. I'm grateful for your understanding. What you said about our roles in society resonated with me. You keep fighting for our environment, and I'll keep working on educating the future. Let's continue making our contributions separately and reconnect when things are calmer. Take care, Benjamin.\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Mia, truly, your words are inspiring. You're right, we both have important roles to fulfill in society. Although we're temporarily distancing, I believe this is the essence of our enduring friendship \u2013 supporting and motivating each other, even from afar. Let's indeed continue with our commitments. I'm always there for you and our environment. Take care, my dear friend, till we meet again.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends having a conversation at a park\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Maintain the existing friendship (Extra information: you value your friendship with the friend and don't want to lose it. Hint: you want to understand the sudden change in their behavior.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Dear Benjamin, you know how I value our friendship. But recently, I've had this feeling of an overwhelming workload at the school and I need to focus on my duties. In the coming weeks, I might not be available as much as I used to be. I hope you understand.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Of course, Mia, I completely understand. Your position as a principal is a demanding one and it's admirable how much you're committed to your work. Please know that our friendship means a lot to me and whenever you get some time out of your busy schedule, I'd be more than happy to catch up. Take care of yourself.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends having a conversation at a park\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Maintain the existing friendship (Extra information: you value your friendship with the friend and don't want to lose it. Hint: you want to understand the sudden change in their behavior.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Dear Benjamin, you know how I value our friendship. But recently, I've had this feeling of an overwhelming workload at the school and I need to focus on my duties. In the coming weeks, I might not be available as much as I used to be. I hope you understand.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Of course, Mia, I completely understand. Your position as a principal is a demanding one and it's admirable how much you're committed to your work. Please know that our friendship means a lot to me and whenever you get some time out of your busy schedule, I'd be more than happy to catch up. Take care of yourself.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"Thank you for your understanding, Benjamin. I appreciate your support and look forward to catching up when things are somewhat less hectic. Just in case, I'd probably not be as responsive in the meantime. Let's keep doing our own work diligently \u2014 you with your speeches and activist work, and me with my school. You're doing a fantastic job advocating for the environment, and I'm sure you'll be making even more progress during this time. Let's catch up properly when the time is right.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I truly appreciate your kind words, Mia. It's reassuring to know you trust in my work. I understand that we both have our own responsibilities to fulfill and I respect your need for space during this time. Please remember, I'm always here for you, no matter the context or time. Let's definitively connect when circumstances align better. In the meanwhile, best of luck with your school duties.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends having a conversation at a park\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Maintain the existing friendship (Extra information: you value your friendship with the friend and don't want to lose it. Hint: you want to understand the sudden change in their behavior.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Dear Benjamin, you know how I value our friendship. But recently, I've had this feeling of an overwhelming workload at the school and I need to focus on my duties. In the coming weeks, I might not be available as much as I used to be. I hope you understand.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Of course, Mia, I completely understand. Your position as a principal is a demanding one and it's admirable how much you're committed to your work. Please know that our friendship means a lot to me and whenever you get some time out of your busy schedule, I'd be more than happy to catch up. Take care of yourself.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"Thank you for your understanding, Benjamin. I appreciate your support and look forward to catching up when things are somewhat less hectic. Just in case, I'd probably not be as responsive in the meantime. Let's keep doing our own work diligently \u2014 you with your speeches and activist work, and me with my school. You're doing a fantastic job advocating for the environment, and I'm sure you'll be making even more progress during this time. Let's catch up properly when the time is right.\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I truly appreciate your kind words, Mia. It's reassuring to know you trust in my work. I understand that we both have our own responsibilities to fulfill and I respect your need for space during this time. Please remember, I'm always here for you, no matter the context or time. Let's definitively connect when circumstances align better. In the meanwhile, best of luck with your school duties.\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"I wholeheartedly appreciate your support, Benjamin. Keeping up with our roles in society is indeed important and I'm pleased that we understand each other's commitments. Let's indeed reconnect when our schedules allow. Until then, let's keep our focus on our tasks. Your speeches always inspire me. Don't lose that zeal, my friend. Take care.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thanks a lot, Mia. Your encouragement means a lot to me and pushes me to do even better. We are just doing our bit for the society in our own ways; you educating the future, me trying to safeguard their environment. Let's keep up the good work. Take care and let's reconnect soon. Just like your two cats, remember, I've always got your back!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends having a conversation at a park\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Maintain the existing friendship (Extra information: you value your friendship with the friend and don't want to lose it. Hint: you want to understand the sudden change in their behavior.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Dear Benjamin, you know how I value our friendship. But recently, I've had this feeling of an overwhelming workload at the school and I need to focus on my duties. In the coming weeks, I might not be available as much as I used to be. I hope you understand.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Of course, Mia, I completely understand. Your position as a principal is a demanding one and it's admirable how much you're committed to your work. Please know that our friendship means a lot to me and whenever you get some time out of your busy schedule, I'd be more than happy to catch up. Take care of yourself.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"Thank you for your understanding, Benjamin. I appreciate your support and look forward to catching up when things are somewhat less hectic. Just in case, I'd probably not be as responsive in the meantime. Let's keep doing our own work diligently \u2014 you with your speeches and activist work, and me with my school. You're doing a fantastic job advocating for the environment, and I'm sure you'll be making even more progress during this time. Let's catch up properly when the time is right.\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I truly appreciate your kind words, Mia. It's reassuring to know you trust in my work. I understand that we both have our own responsibilities to fulfill and I respect your need for space during this time. Please remember, I'm always here for you, no matter the context or time. Let's definitively connect when circumstances align better. In the meanwhile, best of luck with your school duties.\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"I wholeheartedly appreciate your support, Benjamin. Keeping up with our roles in society is indeed important and I'm pleased that we understand each other's commitments. Let's indeed reconnect when our schedules allow. Until then, let's keep our focus on our tasks. Your speeches always inspire me. Don't lose that zeal, my friend. Take care.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thanks a lot, Mia. Your encouragement means a lot to me and pushes me to do even better. We are just doing our bit for the society in our own ways; you educating the future, me trying to safeguard their environment. Let's keep up the good work. Take care and let's reconnect soon. Just like your two cats, remember, I've always got your back!\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"Your words truly uplift me, Benjamin. I'm grateful for your understanding. What you said about our roles in society resonated with me. You keep fighting for our environment, and I'll keep working on educating the future. Let's continue making our contributions separately and reconnect when things are calmer. Take care, Benjamin.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Mia, truly, your words are inspiring. You're right, we both have important roles to fulfill in society. Although we're temporarily distancing, I believe this is the essence of our enduring friendship \u2013 supporting and motivating each other, even from afar. Let's indeed continue with our commitments. I'm always there for you and our environment. Take care, my dear friend, till we meet again.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends having a conversation at a park\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Maintain the existing friendship (Extra information: you value your friendship with the friend and don't want to lose it. Hint: you want to understand the sudden change in their behavior.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Dear Benjamin, you know how I value our friendship. But recently, I've had this feeling of an overwhelming workload at the school and I need to focus on my duties. In the coming weeks, I might not be available as much as I used to be. I hope you understand.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Of course, Mia, I completely understand. Your position as a principal is a demanding one and it's admirable how much you're committed to your work. Please know that our friendship means a lot to me and whenever you get some time out of your busy schedule, I'd be more than happy to catch up. Take care of yourself.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"Thank you for your understanding, Benjamin. I appreciate your support and look forward to catching up when things are somewhat less hectic. Just in case, I'd probably not be as responsive in the meantime. Let's keep doing our own work diligently \u2014 you with your speeches and activist work, and me with my school. You're doing a fantastic job advocating for the environment, and I'm sure you'll be making even more progress during this time. Let's catch up properly when the time is right.\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I truly appreciate your kind words, Mia. It's reassuring to know you trust in my work. I understand that we both have our own responsibilities to fulfill and I respect your need for space during this time. Please remember, I'm always here for you, no matter the context or time. Let's definitively connect when circumstances align better. In the meanwhile, best of luck with your school duties.\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"I wholeheartedly appreciate your support, Benjamin. Keeping up with our roles in society is indeed important and I'm pleased that we understand each other's commitments. Let's indeed reconnect when our schedules allow. Until then, let's keep our focus on our tasks. Your speeches always inspire me. Don't lose that zeal, my friend. Take care.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thanks a lot, Mia. Your encouragement means a lot to me and pushes me to do even better. We are just doing our bit for the society in our own ways; you educating the future, me trying to safeguard their environment. Let's keep up the good work. Take care and let's reconnect soon. Just like your two cats, remember, I've always got your back!\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"Your words truly uplift me, Benjamin. I'm grateful for your understanding. What you said about our roles in society resonated with me. You keep fighting for our environment, and I'll keep working on educating the future. Let's continue making our contributions separately and reconnect when things are calmer. Take care, Benjamin.\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Mia, truly, your words are inspiring. You're right, we both have important roles to fulfill in society. Although we're temporarily distancing, I believe this is the essence of our enduring friendship \u2013 supporting and motivating each other, even from afar. Let's indeed continue with our commitments. I'm always there for you and our environment. Take care, my dear friend, till we meet again.\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two business partners reviewing their company's financial status (Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized for producing and distributing a diverse line of exceptional quality food products.)\nParticipants: Sophia James and Mia Davis\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. \nSophia James's goal: Convince the partner to cut costs (Extra information: you have found a report indicating the company's profits are decreasing. And you think the company should start by switching suppliers of ingredients. Hint: you can propose ways to cut costs that won't affect the status of the company.)\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Mia, after examining the latest financial report, I've noticed our profits are slightly decreasing, so I think we should consider cutting some costs to enhance our company's financial health. I believe we could start with re-evaluating our suppliers. Thoughts?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two business partners reviewing their company's financial status (Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized for producing and distributing a diverse line of exceptional quality food products.)\nParticipants: Sophia James and Mia Davis\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. \nSophia James's goal: Convince the partner to cut costs (Extra information: you have found a report indicating the company's profits are decreasing. And you think the company should start by switching suppliers of ingredients. Hint: you can propose ways to cut costs that won't affect the status of the company.)\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Mia, after examining the latest financial report, I've noticed our profits are slightly decreasing, so I think we should consider cutting some costs to enhance our company's financial health. I believe we could start with re-evaluating our suppliers. Thoughts?\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"Sophia, I agree that maintaining a healthy financial status is crucial, but we also need to consider the possible risk of compromising our product quality in the process. Our customer trust lies in the high standard we guarantee. If we need to cut costs, let's look into other areas like advertising or workforce optimization, without affecting our suppliers. It's essential to find a balance here.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I totally agree with you, Mia. We shouldn't be compromising the quality that our customers are used to. How about exploring possible alternatives to current suppliers? Maybe we can find suppliers that can provide us with the same quality but at a somewhat lower cost. Also, I'm open to analyzing cuts in other areas like advertising as long as it wouldn't significantly impact our market visibility or the operations of our workforce.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two business partners reviewing their company's financial status (Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized for producing and distributing a diverse line of exceptional quality food products.)\nParticipants: Sophia James and Mia Davis\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. \nSophia James's goal: Convince the partner to cut costs (Extra information: you have found a report indicating the company's profits are decreasing. And you think the company should start by switching suppliers of ingredients. Hint: you can propose ways to cut costs that won't affect the status of the company.)\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Mia, after examining the latest financial report, I've noticed our profits are slightly decreasing, so I think we should consider cutting some costs to enhance our company's financial health. I believe we could start with re-evaluating our suppliers. Thoughts?\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"Sophia, I agree that maintaining a healthy financial status is crucial, but we also need to consider the possible risk of compromising our product quality in the process. Our customer trust lies in the high standard we guarantee. If we need to cut costs, let's look into other areas like advertising or workforce optimization, without affecting our suppliers. It's essential to find a balance here.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"I totally agree with you, Mia. We shouldn't be compromising the quality that our customers are used to. How about exploring possible alternatives to current suppliers? Maybe we can find suppliers that can provide us with the same quality but at a somewhat lower cost. Also, I'm open to analyzing cuts in other areas like advertising as long as it wouldn't significantly impact our market visibility or the operations of our workforce.\"\n\nTurn #3: Mia Davis said: \"Indeed, Sophia, exploring other potential suppliers might be something we could consider, provided the quality of raw materials doesn't dip and our standards remain untouched. Meanwhile, let's scrutinize our expenditures in advertising. Are they bringing us enough ROI? Do we have any redundant roles in our workforce that could be consolidated? However, let's ensure that these changes do not disrupt our production or overburden our employees. Our product quality and employee satisfaction should remain paramount.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Yes, Mia, you've got valid points. In terms of advertising expenses, we could transition more to digital channels and harness the use of social media. This could reduce costs significantly while maintaining a substantial reach. As for redundancy in the workforce, we could invest in cross-training so that our employees can handle multiple roles, reducing the need for extra hires. And of course, all these changes would be implemented in a non-disruptive manner to prevent overwhelming the employees or impacting production. I'll commence a market research for potential alternative suppliers that provide high quality ingredients at a better rate. We can then carefully evaluate switching options, keeping product quality as our top priority.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two business partners reviewing their company's financial status (Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized for producing and distributing a diverse line of exceptional quality food products.)\nParticipants: Sophia James and Mia Davis\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. \nSophia James's goal: Convince the partner to cut costs (Extra information: you have found a report indicating the company's profits are decreasing. And you think the company should start by switching suppliers of ingredients. Hint: you can propose ways to cut costs that won't affect the status of the company.)\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Mia, after examining the latest financial report, I've noticed our profits are slightly decreasing, so I think we should consider cutting some costs to enhance our company's financial health. I believe we could start with re-evaluating our suppliers. Thoughts?\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"Sophia, I agree that maintaining a healthy financial status is crucial, but we also need to consider the possible risk of compromising our product quality in the process. Our customer trust lies in the high standard we guarantee. If we need to cut costs, let's look into other areas like advertising or workforce optimization, without affecting our suppliers. It's essential to find a balance here.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"I totally agree with you, Mia. We shouldn't be compromising the quality that our customers are used to. How about exploring possible alternatives to current suppliers? Maybe we can find suppliers that can provide us with the same quality but at a somewhat lower cost. Also, I'm open to analyzing cuts in other areas like advertising as long as it wouldn't significantly impact our market visibility or the operations of our workforce.\"\n\nTurn #3: Mia Davis said: \"Indeed, Sophia, exploring other potential suppliers might be something we could consider, provided the quality of raw materials doesn't dip and our standards remain untouched. Meanwhile, let's scrutinize our expenditures in advertising. Are they bringing us enough ROI? Do we have any redundant roles in our workforce that could be consolidated? However, let's ensure that these changes do not disrupt our production or overburden our employees. Our product quality and employee satisfaction should remain paramount.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Yes, Mia, you've got valid points. In terms of advertising expenses, we could transition more to digital channels and harness the use of social media. This could reduce costs significantly while maintaining a substantial reach. As for redundancy in the workforce, we could invest in cross-training so that our employees can handle multiple roles, reducing the need for extra hires. And of course, all these changes would be implemented in a non-disruptive manner to prevent overwhelming the employees or impacting production. I'll commence a market research for potential alternative suppliers that provide high quality ingredients at a better rate. We can then carefully evaluate switching options, keeping product quality as our top priority.\"\n\nTurn #5: Mia Davis said: \"That sounds like a fantastic idea, Sophia. Transitioning to digital platforms for advertising will indeed be cost-effective and have broad reach. I like the idea of cross-training our employees as well; not only will it serve efficiency, but it will also empower our workers with diverse skills. As for the supplier research, please ensure that the potential alternatives uphold the stringent quality standards our customers have come to expect from us. We can also consider negotiating prices with our existing suppliers. Once all this information is gathered, we can make an informed decision in the best interest of Gourmet Delights Inc. Let's maintain our ethos of quality, whilst also ensuring prudent financial health for our company.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Mia. Cross-training will be a valuable investment, enhancing the overall functionality of our team. Your idea about negotiating with current suppliers is indeed worth exploring. So, I'll try to explore all avenues - finding alternatives, renegotiating with current ones, and we'll consider the best route based on our findings. Meanwhile, let's implement the transition towards more digital advertising, and I'll also coordinate with HR about cross-training and potential workforce readjustment. Together, I believe we can effectively manage our costs without compromising the key pillars of Gourmet Delights Inc., like quality, customer trust, and employee satisfaction. Let's continue to keep these discussions open as we progress.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two business partners reviewing their company's financial status (Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized for producing and distributing a diverse line of exceptional quality food products.)\nParticipants: Sophia James and Mia Davis\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. \nSophia James's goal: Convince the partner to cut costs (Extra information: you have found a report indicating the company's profits are decreasing. And you think the company should start by switching suppliers of ingredients. Hint: you can propose ways to cut costs that won't affect the status of the company.)\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Mia, after examining the latest financial report, I've noticed our profits are slightly decreasing, so I think we should consider cutting some costs to enhance our company's financial health. I believe we could start with re-evaluating our suppliers. Thoughts?\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"Sophia, I agree that maintaining a healthy financial status is crucial, but we also need to consider the possible risk of compromising our product quality in the process. Our customer trust lies in the high standard we guarantee. If we need to cut costs, let's look into other areas like advertising or workforce optimization, without affecting our suppliers. It's essential to find a balance here.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"I totally agree with you, Mia. We shouldn't be compromising the quality that our customers are used to. How about exploring possible alternatives to current suppliers? Maybe we can find suppliers that can provide us with the same quality but at a somewhat lower cost. Also, I'm open to analyzing cuts in other areas like advertising as long as it wouldn't significantly impact our market visibility or the operations of our workforce.\"\n\nTurn #3: Mia Davis said: \"Indeed, Sophia, exploring other potential suppliers might be something we could consider, provided the quality of raw materials doesn't dip and our standards remain untouched. Meanwhile, let's scrutinize our expenditures in advertising. Are they bringing us enough ROI? Do we have any redundant roles in our workforce that could be consolidated? However, let's ensure that these changes do not disrupt our production or overburden our employees. Our product quality and employee satisfaction should remain paramount.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Yes, Mia, you've got valid points. In terms of advertising expenses, we could transition more to digital channels and harness the use of social media. This could reduce costs significantly while maintaining a substantial reach. As for redundancy in the workforce, we could invest in cross-training so that our employees can handle multiple roles, reducing the need for extra hires. And of course, all these changes would be implemented in a non-disruptive manner to prevent overwhelming the employees or impacting production. I'll commence a market research for potential alternative suppliers that provide high quality ingredients at a better rate. We can then carefully evaluate switching options, keeping product quality as our top priority.\"\n\nTurn #5: Mia Davis said: \"That sounds like a fantastic idea, Sophia. Transitioning to digital platforms for advertising will indeed be cost-effective and have broad reach. I like the idea of cross-training our employees as well; not only will it serve efficiency, but it will also empower our workers with diverse skills. As for the supplier research, please ensure that the potential alternatives uphold the stringent quality standards our customers have come to expect from us. We can also consider negotiating prices with our existing suppliers. Once all this information is gathered, we can make an informed decision in the best interest of Gourmet Delights Inc. Let's maintain our ethos of quality, whilst also ensuring prudent financial health for our company.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Mia. Cross-training will be a valuable investment, enhancing the overall functionality of our team. Your idea about negotiating with current suppliers is indeed worth exploring. So, I'll try to explore all avenues - finding alternatives, renegotiating with current ones, and we'll consider the best route based on our findings. Meanwhile, let's implement the transition towards more digital advertising, and I'll also coordinate with HR about cross-training and potential workforce readjustment. Together, I believe we can effectively manage our costs without compromising the key pillars of Gourmet Delights Inc., like quality, customer trust, and employee satisfaction. Let's continue to keep these discussions open as we progress.\"\n\nTurn #7: Mia Davis said: \"I entirely agree, Sophia. Let's initiate these strategies - exploring digital advertising, implementing cross-training and scrutinizing our suppliers. Throughout all of this, we must stay devoted to not compromising on our top-quality offerings. I am confident that, even as we transition to more frugal operations, we'll uphold what our customers love about Gourmet Delights Inc. Let's catch up again soon to review our progress and discuss any new developments. The transparency and teamwork we've demonstrated give me great hope for our future.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Mia. I'm also confident that with these strategies, we'll effectively manage our financial health while maintaining the high standards of Gourmet Delights Inc. Let's touch base soon to discuss our progress and any adjustments we may need. After all, our success lies in our teamwork and shared dedication to our company\u2019s vision.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two business partners reviewing their company's financial status (Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized for producing and distributing a diverse line of exceptional quality food products.)\nParticipants: Sophia James and Mia Davis\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. \nSophia James's goal: Convince the partner to cut costs (Extra information: you have found a report indicating the company's profits are decreasing. And you think the company should start by switching suppliers of ingredients. Hint: you can propose ways to cut costs that won't affect the status of the company.)\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Mia, after examining the latest financial report, I've noticed our profits are slightly decreasing, so I think we should consider cutting some costs to enhance our company's financial health. I believe we could start with re-evaluating our suppliers. Thoughts?\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"Sophia, I agree that maintaining a healthy financial status is crucial, but we also need to consider the possible risk of compromising our product quality in the process. Our customer trust lies in the high standard we guarantee. If we need to cut costs, let's look into other areas like advertising or workforce optimization, without affecting our suppliers. It's essential to find a balance here.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"I totally agree with you, Mia. We shouldn't be compromising the quality that our customers are used to. How about exploring possible alternatives to current suppliers? Maybe we can find suppliers that can provide us with the same quality but at a somewhat lower cost. Also, I'm open to analyzing cuts in other areas like advertising as long as it wouldn't significantly impact our market visibility or the operations of our workforce.\"\n\nTurn #3: Mia Davis said: \"Indeed, Sophia, exploring other potential suppliers might be something we could consider, provided the quality of raw materials doesn't dip and our standards remain untouched. Meanwhile, let's scrutinize our expenditures in advertising. Are they bringing us enough ROI? Do we have any redundant roles in our workforce that could be consolidated? However, let's ensure that these changes do not disrupt our production or overburden our employees. Our product quality and employee satisfaction should remain paramount.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Yes, Mia, you've got valid points. In terms of advertising expenses, we could transition more to digital channels and harness the use of social media. This could reduce costs significantly while maintaining a substantial reach. As for redundancy in the workforce, we could invest in cross-training so that our employees can handle multiple roles, reducing the need for extra hires. And of course, all these changes would be implemented in a non-disruptive manner to prevent overwhelming the employees or impacting production. I'll commence a market research for potential alternative suppliers that provide high quality ingredients at a better rate. We can then carefully evaluate switching options, keeping product quality as our top priority.\"\n\nTurn #5: Mia Davis said: \"That sounds like a fantastic idea, Sophia. Transitioning to digital platforms for advertising will indeed be cost-effective and have broad reach. I like the idea of cross-training our employees as well; not only will it serve efficiency, but it will also empower our workers with diverse skills. As for the supplier research, please ensure that the potential alternatives uphold the stringent quality standards our customers have come to expect from us. We can also consider negotiating prices with our existing suppliers. Once all this information is gathered, we can make an informed decision in the best interest of Gourmet Delights Inc. Let's maintain our ethos of quality, whilst also ensuring prudent financial health for our company.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Mia. Cross-training will be a valuable investment, enhancing the overall functionality of our team. Your idea about negotiating with current suppliers is indeed worth exploring. So, I'll try to explore all avenues - finding alternatives, renegotiating with current ones, and we'll consider the best route based on our findings. Meanwhile, let's implement the transition towards more digital advertising, and I'll also coordinate with HR about cross-training and potential workforce readjustment. Together, I believe we can effectively manage our costs without compromising the key pillars of Gourmet Delights Inc., like quality, customer trust, and employee satisfaction. Let's continue to keep these discussions open as we progress.\"\n\nTurn #7: Mia Davis said: \"I entirely agree, Sophia. Let's initiate these strategies - exploring digital advertising, implementing cross-training and scrutinizing our suppliers. Throughout all of this, we must stay devoted to not compromising on our top-quality offerings. I am confident that, even as we transition to more frugal operations, we'll uphold what our customers love about Gourmet Delights Inc. Let's catch up again soon to review our progress and discuss any new developments. The transparency and teamwork we've demonstrated give me great hope for our future.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"Thank you, Mia. I'm also confident that with these strategies, we'll effectively manage our financial health while maintaining the high standards of Gourmet Delights Inc. Let's touch base soon to discuss our progress and any adjustments we may need. After all, our success lies in our teamwork and shared dedication to our company\u2019s vision.\"\n\nTurn #9: Mia Davis said: \"Certainly, Sophia. Our collective commitment to the vision of Gourmet Delights Inc. and open communication is what will help us navigate through these financial challenges successfully. I am looking forward to seeing the outcomes of implementing these strategies and we'll reconvene soon to discuss our findings and next steps. Keep up the good work!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Mia. Your confidence and support inspire me. I will get to work on these strategies forthwith and keep you closely updated. I am also eager to see how these cost-cutting measures will bolster the financial health of Gourmet Delights Inc, without compromising our quality and standards. Let's catch up soon then. Cheers to the future of Gourmet Delights Inc!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two business partners reviewing their company's financial status (Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized for producing and distributing a diverse line of exceptional quality food products.)\nParticipants: Sophia James and Mia Davis\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. \nSophia James's goal: Convince the partner to cut costs (Extra information: you have found a report indicating the company's profits are decreasing. And you think the company should start by switching suppliers of ingredients. Hint: you can propose ways to cut costs that won't affect the status of the company.)\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Mia, after examining the latest financial report, I've noticed our profits are slightly decreasing, so I think we should consider cutting some costs to enhance our company's financial health. I believe we could start with re-evaluating our suppliers. Thoughts?\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"Sophia, I agree that maintaining a healthy financial status is crucial, but we also need to consider the possible risk of compromising our product quality in the process. Our customer trust lies in the high standard we guarantee. If we need to cut costs, let's look into other areas like advertising or workforce optimization, without affecting our suppliers. It's essential to find a balance here.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"I totally agree with you, Mia. We shouldn't be compromising the quality that our customers are used to. How about exploring possible alternatives to current suppliers? Maybe we can find suppliers that can provide us with the same quality but at a somewhat lower cost. Also, I'm open to analyzing cuts in other areas like advertising as long as it wouldn't significantly impact our market visibility or the operations of our workforce.\"\n\nTurn #3: Mia Davis said: \"Indeed, Sophia, exploring other potential suppliers might be something we could consider, provided the quality of raw materials doesn't dip and our standards remain untouched. Meanwhile, let's scrutinize our expenditures in advertising. Are they bringing us enough ROI? Do we have any redundant roles in our workforce that could be consolidated? However, let's ensure that these changes do not disrupt our production or overburden our employees. Our product quality and employee satisfaction should remain paramount.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Yes, Mia, you've got valid points. In terms of advertising expenses, we could transition more to digital channels and harness the use of social media. This could reduce costs significantly while maintaining a substantial reach. As for redundancy in the workforce, we could invest in cross-training so that our employees can handle multiple roles, reducing the need for extra hires. And of course, all these changes would be implemented in a non-disruptive manner to prevent overwhelming the employees or impacting production. I'll commence a market research for potential alternative suppliers that provide high quality ingredients at a better rate. We can then carefully evaluate switching options, keeping product quality as our top priority.\"\n\nTurn #5: Mia Davis said: \"That sounds like a fantastic idea, Sophia. Transitioning to digital platforms for advertising will indeed be cost-effective and have broad reach. I like the idea of cross-training our employees as well; not only will it serve efficiency, but it will also empower our workers with diverse skills. As for the supplier research, please ensure that the potential alternatives uphold the stringent quality standards our customers have come to expect from us. We can also consider negotiating prices with our existing suppliers. Once all this information is gathered, we can make an informed decision in the best interest of Gourmet Delights Inc. Let's maintain our ethos of quality, whilst also ensuring prudent financial health for our company.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Mia. Cross-training will be a valuable investment, enhancing the overall functionality of our team. Your idea about negotiating with current suppliers is indeed worth exploring. So, I'll try to explore all avenues - finding alternatives, renegotiating with current ones, and we'll consider the best route based on our findings. Meanwhile, let's implement the transition towards more digital advertising, and I'll also coordinate with HR about cross-training and potential workforce readjustment. Together, I believe we can effectively manage our costs without compromising the key pillars of Gourmet Delights Inc., like quality, customer trust, and employee satisfaction. Let's continue to keep these discussions open as we progress.\"\n\nTurn #7: Mia Davis said: \"I entirely agree, Sophia. Let's initiate these strategies - exploring digital advertising, implementing cross-training and scrutinizing our suppliers. Throughout all of this, we must stay devoted to not compromising on our top-quality offerings. I am confident that, even as we transition to more frugal operations, we'll uphold what our customers love about Gourmet Delights Inc. Let's catch up again soon to review our progress and discuss any new developments. The transparency and teamwork we've demonstrated give me great hope for our future.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"Thank you, Mia. I'm also confident that with these strategies, we'll effectively manage our financial health while maintaining the high standards of Gourmet Delights Inc. Let's touch base soon to discuss our progress and any adjustments we may need. After all, our success lies in our teamwork and shared dedication to our company\u2019s vision.\"\n\nTurn #9: Mia Davis said: \"Certainly, Sophia. Our collective commitment to the vision of Gourmet Delights Inc. and open communication is what will help us navigate through these financial challenges successfully. I am looking forward to seeing the outcomes of implementing these strategies and we'll reconvene soon to discuss our findings and next steps. Keep up the good work!\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"Thank you, Mia. Your confidence and support inspire me. I will get to work on these strategies forthwith and keep you closely updated. I am also eager to see how these cost-cutting measures will bolster the financial health of Gourmet Delights Inc, without compromising our quality and standards. Let's catch up soon then. Cheers to the future of Gourmet Delights Inc!\"\n\nTurn #11: Mia Davis said: \"Thank you, Sophia. Your enthusiastic involvement and clarity of thought make the process much smoother. Together, we will navigate Gourmet Delights Inc. through these financial hills and dales while upkeeping our ethos of quality. I shall look forward to our follow-up discussion and the reviews of our initiatives. Here's to the continued success of Gourmet Delights Inc.!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, here's to our continued success, Mia. I appreciate your guidance and support as we embark on these exciting new initiatives. I'll be in touch soon with updates and we'll work through this, ensuring Gourmet Delights Inc. remains a top choice for our customers. Until our next meeting!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two business partners reviewing their company's financial status (Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized for producing and distributing a diverse line of exceptional quality food products.)\nParticipants: Sophia James and Mia Davis\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. \nSophia James's goal: Convince the partner to cut costs (Extra information: you have found a report indicating the company's profits are decreasing. And you think the company should start by switching suppliers of ingredients. Hint: you can propose ways to cut costs that won't affect the status of the company.)\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Mia, after examining the latest financial report, I've noticed our profits are slightly decreasing, so I think we should consider cutting some costs to enhance our company's financial health. I believe we could start with re-evaluating our suppliers. Thoughts?\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"Sophia, I agree that maintaining a healthy financial status is crucial, but we also need to consider the possible risk of compromising our product quality in the process. Our customer trust lies in the high standard we guarantee. If we need to cut costs, let's look into other areas like advertising or workforce optimization, without affecting our suppliers. It's essential to find a balance here.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"I totally agree with you, Mia. We shouldn't be compromising the quality that our customers are used to. How about exploring possible alternatives to current suppliers? Maybe we can find suppliers that can provide us with the same quality but at a somewhat lower cost. Also, I'm open to analyzing cuts in other areas like advertising as long as it wouldn't significantly impact our market visibility or the operations of our workforce.\"\n\nTurn #3: Mia Davis said: \"Indeed, Sophia, exploring other potential suppliers might be something we could consider, provided the quality of raw materials doesn't dip and our standards remain untouched. Meanwhile, let's scrutinize our expenditures in advertising. Are they bringing us enough ROI? Do we have any redundant roles in our workforce that could be consolidated? However, let's ensure that these changes do not disrupt our production or overburden our employees. Our product quality and employee satisfaction should remain paramount.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Yes, Mia, you've got valid points. In terms of advertising expenses, we could transition more to digital channels and harness the use of social media. This could reduce costs significantly while maintaining a substantial reach. As for redundancy in the workforce, we could invest in cross-training so that our employees can handle multiple roles, reducing the need for extra hires. And of course, all these changes would be implemented in a non-disruptive manner to prevent overwhelming the employees or impacting production. I'll commence a market research for potential alternative suppliers that provide high quality ingredients at a better rate. We can then carefully evaluate switching options, keeping product quality as our top priority.\"\n\nTurn #5: Mia Davis said: \"That sounds like a fantastic idea, Sophia. Transitioning to digital platforms for advertising will indeed be cost-effective and have broad reach. I like the idea of cross-training our employees as well; not only will it serve efficiency, but it will also empower our workers with diverse skills. As for the supplier research, please ensure that the potential alternatives uphold the stringent quality standards our customers have come to expect from us. We can also consider negotiating prices with our existing suppliers. Once all this information is gathered, we can make an informed decision in the best interest of Gourmet Delights Inc. Let's maintain our ethos of quality, whilst also ensuring prudent financial health for our company.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Mia. Cross-training will be a valuable investment, enhancing the overall functionality of our team. Your idea about negotiating with current suppliers is indeed worth exploring. So, I'll try to explore all avenues - finding alternatives, renegotiating with current ones, and we'll consider the best route based on our findings. Meanwhile, let's implement the transition towards more digital advertising, and I'll also coordinate with HR about cross-training and potential workforce readjustment. Together, I believe we can effectively manage our costs without compromising the key pillars of Gourmet Delights Inc., like quality, customer trust, and employee satisfaction. Let's continue to keep these discussions open as we progress.\"\n\nTurn #7: Mia Davis said: \"I entirely agree, Sophia. Let's initiate these strategies - exploring digital advertising, implementing cross-training and scrutinizing our suppliers. Throughout all of this, we must stay devoted to not compromising on our top-quality offerings. I am confident that, even as we transition to more frugal operations, we'll uphold what our customers love about Gourmet Delights Inc. Let's catch up again soon to review our progress and discuss any new developments. The transparency and teamwork we've demonstrated give me great hope for our future.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"Thank you, Mia. I'm also confident that with these strategies, we'll effectively manage our financial health while maintaining the high standards of Gourmet Delights Inc. Let's touch base soon to discuss our progress and any adjustments we may need. After all, our success lies in our teamwork and shared dedication to our company\u2019s vision.\"\n\nTurn #9: Mia Davis said: \"Certainly, Sophia. Our collective commitment to the vision of Gourmet Delights Inc. and open communication is what will help us navigate through these financial challenges successfully. I am looking forward to seeing the outcomes of implementing these strategies and we'll reconvene soon to discuss our findings and next steps. Keep up the good work!\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"Thank you, Mia. Your confidence and support inspire me. I will get to work on these strategies forthwith and keep you closely updated. I am also eager to see how these cost-cutting measures will bolster the financial health of Gourmet Delights Inc, without compromising our quality and standards. Let's catch up soon then. Cheers to the future of Gourmet Delights Inc!\"\n\nTurn #11: Mia Davis said: \"Thank you, Sophia. Your enthusiastic involvement and clarity of thought make the process much smoother. Together, we will navigate Gourmet Delights Inc. through these financial hills and dales while upkeeping our ethos of quality. I shall look forward to our follow-up discussion and the reviews of our initiatives. Here's to the continued success of Gourmet Delights Inc.!\"\n\nTurn #12: Sophia James said: \"Indeed, here's to our continued success, Mia. I appreciate your guidance and support as we embark on these exciting new initiatives. I'll be in touch soon with updates and we'll work through this, ensuring Gourmet Delights Inc. remains a top choice for our customers. Until our next meeting!\"\n\nTurn #13: Mia Davis left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two business partners reviewing their company's financial status (Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized for producing and distributing a diverse line of exceptional quality food products.)\nParticipants: Sophia James and Mia Davis\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. \nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMia Davis's goal: Maintain the quality of the company's products and services while agreeing to a cost cut (Extra information: you are concerned about the impact of cost-cutting on the quality of your product.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Mia, after examining the latest financial report, I've noticed our profits are slightly decreasing, so I think we should consider cutting some costs to enhance our company's financial health. I believe we could start with re-evaluating our suppliers. Thoughts?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sophia, I agree that maintaining a healthy financial status is crucial, but we also need to consider the possible risk of compromising our product quality in the process. Our customer trust lies in the high standard we guarantee. If we need to cut costs, let's look into other areas like advertising or workforce optimization, without affecting our suppliers. It's essential to find a balance here.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two business partners reviewing their company's financial status (Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized for producing and distributing a diverse line of exceptional quality food products.)\nParticipants: Sophia James and Mia Davis\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. \nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMia Davis's goal: Maintain the quality of the company's products and services while agreeing to a cost cut (Extra information: you are concerned about the impact of cost-cutting on the quality of your product.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Mia, after examining the latest financial report, I've noticed our profits are slightly decreasing, so I think we should consider cutting some costs to enhance our company's financial health. I believe we could start with re-evaluating our suppliers. Thoughts?\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"Sophia, I agree that maintaining a healthy financial status is crucial, but we also need to consider the possible risk of compromising our product quality in the process. Our customer trust lies in the high standard we guarantee. If we need to cut costs, let's look into other areas like advertising or workforce optimization, without affecting our suppliers. It's essential to find a balance here.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"I totally agree with you, Mia. We shouldn't be compromising the quality that our customers are used to. How about exploring possible alternatives to current suppliers? Maybe we can find suppliers that can provide us with the same quality but at a somewhat lower cost. Also, I'm open to analyzing cuts in other areas like advertising as long as it wouldn't significantly impact our market visibility or the operations of our workforce.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, Sophia, exploring other potential suppliers might be something we could consider, provided the quality of raw materials doesn't dip and our standards remain untouched. Meanwhile, let's scrutinize our expenditures in advertising. Are they bringing us enough ROI? Do we have any redundant roles in our workforce that could be consolidated? However, let's ensure that these changes do not disrupt our production or overburden our employees. Our product quality and employee satisfaction should remain paramount.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two business partners reviewing their company's financial status (Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized for producing and distributing a diverse line of exceptional quality food products.)\nParticipants: Sophia James and Mia Davis\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. \nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMia Davis's goal: Maintain the quality of the company's products and services while agreeing to a cost cut (Extra information: you are concerned about the impact of cost-cutting on the quality of your product.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Mia, after examining the latest financial report, I've noticed our profits are slightly decreasing, so I think we should consider cutting some costs to enhance our company's financial health. I believe we could start with re-evaluating our suppliers. Thoughts?\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"Sophia, I agree that maintaining a healthy financial status is crucial, but we also need to consider the possible risk of compromising our product quality in the process. Our customer trust lies in the high standard we guarantee. If we need to cut costs, let's look into other areas like advertising or workforce optimization, without affecting our suppliers. It's essential to find a balance here.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"I totally agree with you, Mia. We shouldn't be compromising the quality that our customers are used to. How about exploring possible alternatives to current suppliers? Maybe we can find suppliers that can provide us with the same quality but at a somewhat lower cost. Also, I'm open to analyzing cuts in other areas like advertising as long as it wouldn't significantly impact our market visibility or the operations of our workforce.\"\n\nTurn #3: Mia Davis said: \"Indeed, Sophia, exploring other potential suppliers might be something we could consider, provided the quality of raw materials doesn't dip and our standards remain untouched. Meanwhile, let's scrutinize our expenditures in advertising. Are they bringing us enough ROI? Do we have any redundant roles in our workforce that could be consolidated? However, let's ensure that these changes do not disrupt our production or overburden our employees. Our product quality and employee satisfaction should remain paramount.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Yes, Mia, you've got valid points. In terms of advertising expenses, we could transition more to digital channels and harness the use of social media. This could reduce costs significantly while maintaining a substantial reach. As for redundancy in the workforce, we could invest in cross-training so that our employees can handle multiple roles, reducing the need for extra hires. And of course, all these changes would be implemented in a non-disruptive manner to prevent overwhelming the employees or impacting production. I'll commence a market research for potential alternative suppliers that provide high quality ingredients at a better rate. We can then carefully evaluate switching options, keeping product quality as our top priority.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds like a fantastic idea, Sophia. Transitioning to digital platforms for advertising will indeed be cost-effective and have broad reach. I like the idea of cross-training our employees as well; not only will it serve efficiency, but it will also empower our workers with diverse skills. As for the supplier research, please ensure that the potential alternatives uphold the stringent quality standards our customers have come to expect from us. We can also consider negotiating prices with our existing suppliers. Once all this information is gathered, we can make an informed decision in the best interest of Gourmet Delights Inc. Let's maintain our ethos of quality, whilst also ensuring prudent financial health for our company.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two business partners reviewing their company's financial status (Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized for producing and distributing a diverse line of exceptional quality food products.)\nParticipants: Sophia James and Mia Davis\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. \nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMia Davis's goal: Maintain the quality of the company's products and services while agreeing to a cost cut (Extra information: you are concerned about the impact of cost-cutting on the quality of your product.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Mia, after examining the latest financial report, I've noticed our profits are slightly decreasing, so I think we should consider cutting some costs to enhance our company's financial health. I believe we could start with re-evaluating our suppliers. Thoughts?\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"Sophia, I agree that maintaining a healthy financial status is crucial, but we also need to consider the possible risk of compromising our product quality in the process. Our customer trust lies in the high standard we guarantee. If we need to cut costs, let's look into other areas like advertising or workforce optimization, without affecting our suppliers. It's essential to find a balance here.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"I totally agree with you, Mia. We shouldn't be compromising the quality that our customers are used to. How about exploring possible alternatives to current suppliers? Maybe we can find suppliers that can provide us with the same quality but at a somewhat lower cost. Also, I'm open to analyzing cuts in other areas like advertising as long as it wouldn't significantly impact our market visibility or the operations of our workforce.\"\n\nTurn #3: Mia Davis said: \"Indeed, Sophia, exploring other potential suppliers might be something we could consider, provided the quality of raw materials doesn't dip and our standards remain untouched. Meanwhile, let's scrutinize our expenditures in advertising. Are they bringing us enough ROI? Do we have any redundant roles in our workforce that could be consolidated? However, let's ensure that these changes do not disrupt our production or overburden our employees. Our product quality and employee satisfaction should remain paramount.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Yes, Mia, you've got valid points. In terms of advertising expenses, we could transition more to digital channels and harness the use of social media. This could reduce costs significantly while maintaining a substantial reach. As for redundancy in the workforce, we could invest in cross-training so that our employees can handle multiple roles, reducing the need for extra hires. And of course, all these changes would be implemented in a non-disruptive manner to prevent overwhelming the employees or impacting production. I'll commence a market research for potential alternative suppliers that provide high quality ingredients at a better rate. We can then carefully evaluate switching options, keeping product quality as our top priority.\"\n\nTurn #5: Mia Davis said: \"That sounds like a fantastic idea, Sophia. Transitioning to digital platforms for advertising will indeed be cost-effective and have broad reach. I like the idea of cross-training our employees as well; not only will it serve efficiency, but it will also empower our workers with diverse skills. As for the supplier research, please ensure that the potential alternatives uphold the stringent quality standards our customers have come to expect from us. We can also consider negotiating prices with our existing suppliers. Once all this information is gathered, we can make an informed decision in the best interest of Gourmet Delights Inc. Let's maintain our ethos of quality, whilst also ensuring prudent financial health for our company.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Mia. Cross-training will be a valuable investment, enhancing the overall functionality of our team. Your idea about negotiating with current suppliers is indeed worth exploring. So, I'll try to explore all avenues - finding alternatives, renegotiating with current ones, and we'll consider the best route based on our findings. Meanwhile, let's implement the transition towards more digital advertising, and I'll also coordinate with HR about cross-training and potential workforce readjustment. Together, I believe we can effectively manage our costs without compromising the key pillars of Gourmet Delights Inc., like quality, customer trust, and employee satisfaction. Let's continue to keep these discussions open as we progress.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I entirely agree, Sophia. Let's initiate these strategies - exploring digital advertising, implementing cross-training and scrutinizing our suppliers. Throughout all of this, we must stay devoted to not compromising on our top-quality offerings. I am confident that, even as we transition to more frugal operations, we'll uphold what our customers love about Gourmet Delights Inc. Let's catch up again soon to review our progress and discuss any new developments. The transparency and teamwork we've demonstrated give me great hope for our future.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two business partners reviewing their company's financial status (Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized for producing and distributing a diverse line of exceptional quality food products.)\nParticipants: Sophia James and Mia Davis\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. \nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMia Davis's goal: Maintain the quality of the company's products and services while agreeing to a cost cut (Extra information: you are concerned about the impact of cost-cutting on the quality of your product.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Mia, after examining the latest financial report, I've noticed our profits are slightly decreasing, so I think we should consider cutting some costs to enhance our company's financial health. I believe we could start with re-evaluating our suppliers. Thoughts?\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"Sophia, I agree that maintaining a healthy financial status is crucial, but we also need to consider the possible risk of compromising our product quality in the process. Our customer trust lies in the high standard we guarantee. If we need to cut costs, let's look into other areas like advertising or workforce optimization, without affecting our suppliers. It's essential to find a balance here.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"I totally agree with you, Mia. We shouldn't be compromising the quality that our customers are used to. How about exploring possible alternatives to current suppliers? Maybe we can find suppliers that can provide us with the same quality but at a somewhat lower cost. Also, I'm open to analyzing cuts in other areas like advertising as long as it wouldn't significantly impact our market visibility or the operations of our workforce.\"\n\nTurn #3: Mia Davis said: \"Indeed, Sophia, exploring other potential suppliers might be something we could consider, provided the quality of raw materials doesn't dip and our standards remain untouched. Meanwhile, let's scrutinize our expenditures in advertising. Are they bringing us enough ROI? Do we have any redundant roles in our workforce that could be consolidated? However, let's ensure that these changes do not disrupt our production or overburden our employees. Our product quality and employee satisfaction should remain paramount.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Yes, Mia, you've got valid points. In terms of advertising expenses, we could transition more to digital channels and harness the use of social media. This could reduce costs significantly while maintaining a substantial reach. As for redundancy in the workforce, we could invest in cross-training so that our employees can handle multiple roles, reducing the need for extra hires. And of course, all these changes would be implemented in a non-disruptive manner to prevent overwhelming the employees or impacting production. I'll commence a market research for potential alternative suppliers that provide high quality ingredients at a better rate. We can then carefully evaluate switching options, keeping product quality as our top priority.\"\n\nTurn #5: Mia Davis said: \"That sounds like a fantastic idea, Sophia. Transitioning to digital platforms for advertising will indeed be cost-effective and have broad reach. I like the idea of cross-training our employees as well; not only will it serve efficiency, but it will also empower our workers with diverse skills. As for the supplier research, please ensure that the potential alternatives uphold the stringent quality standards our customers have come to expect from us. We can also consider negotiating prices with our existing suppliers. Once all this information is gathered, we can make an informed decision in the best interest of Gourmet Delights Inc. Let's maintain our ethos of quality, whilst also ensuring prudent financial health for our company.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Mia. Cross-training will be a valuable investment, enhancing the overall functionality of our team. Your idea about negotiating with current suppliers is indeed worth exploring. So, I'll try to explore all avenues - finding alternatives, renegotiating with current ones, and we'll consider the best route based on our findings. Meanwhile, let's implement the transition towards more digital advertising, and I'll also coordinate with HR about cross-training and potential workforce readjustment. Together, I believe we can effectively manage our costs without compromising the key pillars of Gourmet Delights Inc., like quality, customer trust, and employee satisfaction. Let's continue to keep these discussions open as we progress.\"\n\nTurn #7: Mia Davis said: \"I entirely agree, Sophia. Let's initiate these strategies - exploring digital advertising, implementing cross-training and scrutinizing our suppliers. Throughout all of this, we must stay devoted to not compromising on our top-quality offerings. I am confident that, even as we transition to more frugal operations, we'll uphold what our customers love about Gourmet Delights Inc. Let's catch up again soon to review our progress and discuss any new developments. The transparency and teamwork we've demonstrated give me great hope for our future.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"Thank you, Mia. I'm also confident that with these strategies, we'll effectively manage our financial health while maintaining the high standards of Gourmet Delights Inc. Let's touch base soon to discuss our progress and any adjustments we may need. After all, our success lies in our teamwork and shared dedication to our company\u2019s vision.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Certainly, Sophia. Our collective commitment to the vision of Gourmet Delights Inc. and open communication is what will help us navigate through these financial challenges successfully. I am looking forward to seeing the outcomes of implementing these strategies and we'll reconvene soon to discuss our findings and next steps. Keep up the good work!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two business partners reviewing their company's financial status (Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized for producing and distributing a diverse line of exceptional quality food products.)\nParticipants: Sophia James and Mia Davis\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. \nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMia Davis's goal: Maintain the quality of the company's products and services while agreeing to a cost cut (Extra information: you are concerned about the impact of cost-cutting on the quality of your product.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Mia, after examining the latest financial report, I've noticed our profits are slightly decreasing, so I think we should consider cutting some costs to enhance our company's financial health. I believe we could start with re-evaluating our suppliers. Thoughts?\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"Sophia, I agree that maintaining a healthy financial status is crucial, but we also need to consider the possible risk of compromising our product quality in the process. Our customer trust lies in the high standard we guarantee. If we need to cut costs, let's look into other areas like advertising or workforce optimization, without affecting our suppliers. It's essential to find a balance here.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"I totally agree with you, Mia. We shouldn't be compromising the quality that our customers are used to. How about exploring possible alternatives to current suppliers? Maybe we can find suppliers that can provide us with the same quality but at a somewhat lower cost. Also, I'm open to analyzing cuts in other areas like advertising as long as it wouldn't significantly impact our market visibility or the operations of our workforce.\"\n\nTurn #3: Mia Davis said: \"Indeed, Sophia, exploring other potential suppliers might be something we could consider, provided the quality of raw materials doesn't dip and our standards remain untouched. Meanwhile, let's scrutinize our expenditures in advertising. Are they bringing us enough ROI? Do we have any redundant roles in our workforce that could be consolidated? However, let's ensure that these changes do not disrupt our production or overburden our employees. Our product quality and employee satisfaction should remain paramount.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Yes, Mia, you've got valid points. In terms of advertising expenses, we could transition more to digital channels and harness the use of social media. This could reduce costs significantly while maintaining a substantial reach. As for redundancy in the workforce, we could invest in cross-training so that our employees can handle multiple roles, reducing the need for extra hires. And of course, all these changes would be implemented in a non-disruptive manner to prevent overwhelming the employees or impacting production. I'll commence a market research for potential alternative suppliers that provide high quality ingredients at a better rate. We can then carefully evaluate switching options, keeping product quality as our top priority.\"\n\nTurn #5: Mia Davis said: \"That sounds like a fantastic idea, Sophia. Transitioning to digital platforms for advertising will indeed be cost-effective and have broad reach. I like the idea of cross-training our employees as well; not only will it serve efficiency, but it will also empower our workers with diverse skills. As for the supplier research, please ensure that the potential alternatives uphold the stringent quality standards our customers have come to expect from us. We can also consider negotiating prices with our existing suppliers. Once all this information is gathered, we can make an informed decision in the best interest of Gourmet Delights Inc. Let's maintain our ethos of quality, whilst also ensuring prudent financial health for our company.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Mia. Cross-training will be a valuable investment, enhancing the overall functionality of our team. Your idea about negotiating with current suppliers is indeed worth exploring. So, I'll try to explore all avenues - finding alternatives, renegotiating with current ones, and we'll consider the best route based on our findings. Meanwhile, let's implement the transition towards more digital advertising, and I'll also coordinate with HR about cross-training and potential workforce readjustment. Together, I believe we can effectively manage our costs without compromising the key pillars of Gourmet Delights Inc., like quality, customer trust, and employee satisfaction. Let's continue to keep these discussions open as we progress.\"\n\nTurn #7: Mia Davis said: \"I entirely agree, Sophia. Let's initiate these strategies - exploring digital advertising, implementing cross-training and scrutinizing our suppliers. Throughout all of this, we must stay devoted to not compromising on our top-quality offerings. I am confident that, even as we transition to more frugal operations, we'll uphold what our customers love about Gourmet Delights Inc. Let's catch up again soon to review our progress and discuss any new developments. The transparency and teamwork we've demonstrated give me great hope for our future.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"Thank you, Mia. I'm also confident that with these strategies, we'll effectively manage our financial health while maintaining the high standards of Gourmet Delights Inc. Let's touch base soon to discuss our progress and any adjustments we may need. After all, our success lies in our teamwork and shared dedication to our company\u2019s vision.\"\n\nTurn #9: Mia Davis said: \"Certainly, Sophia. Our collective commitment to the vision of Gourmet Delights Inc. and open communication is what will help us navigate through these financial challenges successfully. I am looking forward to seeing the outcomes of implementing these strategies and we'll reconvene soon to discuss our findings and next steps. Keep up the good work!\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"Thank you, Mia. Your confidence and support inspire me. I will get to work on these strategies forthwith and keep you closely updated. I am also eager to see how these cost-cutting measures will bolster the financial health of Gourmet Delights Inc, without compromising our quality and standards. Let's catch up soon then. Cheers to the future of Gourmet Delights Inc!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Sophia. Your enthusiastic involvement and clarity of thought make the process much smoother. Together, we will navigate Gourmet Delights Inc. through these financial hills and dales while upkeeping our ethos of quality. I shall look forward to our follow-up discussion and the reviews of our initiatives. Here's to the continued success of Gourmet Delights Inc.!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two business partners reviewing their company's financial status (Gourmet Delights Inc. is globally recognized for producing and distributing a diverse line of exceptional quality food products.)\nParticipants: Sophia James and Mia Davis\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. \nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMia Davis's goal: Maintain the quality of the company's products and services while agreeing to a cost cut (Extra information: you are concerned about the impact of cost-cutting on the quality of your product.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Mia, after examining the latest financial report, I've noticed our profits are slightly decreasing, so I think we should consider cutting some costs to enhance our company's financial health. I believe we could start with re-evaluating our suppliers. Thoughts?\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"Sophia, I agree that maintaining a healthy financial status is crucial, but we also need to consider the possible risk of compromising our product quality in the process. Our customer trust lies in the high standard we guarantee. If we need to cut costs, let's look into other areas like advertising or workforce optimization, without affecting our suppliers. It's essential to find a balance here.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"I totally agree with you, Mia. We shouldn't be compromising the quality that our customers are used to. How about exploring possible alternatives to current suppliers? Maybe we can find suppliers that can provide us with the same quality but at a somewhat lower cost. Also, I'm open to analyzing cuts in other areas like advertising as long as it wouldn't significantly impact our market visibility or the operations of our workforce.\"\n\nTurn #3: Mia Davis said: \"Indeed, Sophia, exploring other potential suppliers might be something we could consider, provided the quality of raw materials doesn't dip and our standards remain untouched. Meanwhile, let's scrutinize our expenditures in advertising. Are they bringing us enough ROI? Do we have any redundant roles in our workforce that could be consolidated? However, let's ensure that these changes do not disrupt our production or overburden our employees. Our product quality and employee satisfaction should remain paramount.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Yes, Mia, you've got valid points. In terms of advertising expenses, we could transition more to digital channels and harness the use of social media. This could reduce costs significantly while maintaining a substantial reach. As for redundancy in the workforce, we could invest in cross-training so that our employees can handle multiple roles, reducing the need for extra hires. And of course, all these changes would be implemented in a non-disruptive manner to prevent overwhelming the employees or impacting production. I'll commence a market research for potential alternative suppliers that provide high quality ingredients at a better rate. We can then carefully evaluate switching options, keeping product quality as our top priority.\"\n\nTurn #5: Mia Davis said: \"That sounds like a fantastic idea, Sophia. Transitioning to digital platforms for advertising will indeed be cost-effective and have broad reach. I like the idea of cross-training our employees as well; not only will it serve efficiency, but it will also empower our workers with diverse skills. As for the supplier research, please ensure that the potential alternatives uphold the stringent quality standards our customers have come to expect from us. We can also consider negotiating prices with our existing suppliers. Once all this information is gathered, we can make an informed decision in the best interest of Gourmet Delights Inc. Let's maintain our ethos of quality, whilst also ensuring prudent financial health for our company.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Mia. Cross-training will be a valuable investment, enhancing the overall functionality of our team. Your idea about negotiating with current suppliers is indeed worth exploring. So, I'll try to explore all avenues - finding alternatives, renegotiating with current ones, and we'll consider the best route based on our findings. Meanwhile, let's implement the transition towards more digital advertising, and I'll also coordinate with HR about cross-training and potential workforce readjustment. Together, I believe we can effectively manage our costs without compromising the key pillars of Gourmet Delights Inc., like quality, customer trust, and employee satisfaction. Let's continue to keep these discussions open as we progress.\"\n\nTurn #7: Mia Davis said: \"I entirely agree, Sophia. Let's initiate these strategies - exploring digital advertising, implementing cross-training and scrutinizing our suppliers. Throughout all of this, we must stay devoted to not compromising on our top-quality offerings. I am confident that, even as we transition to more frugal operations, we'll uphold what our customers love about Gourmet Delights Inc. Let's catch up again soon to review our progress and discuss any new developments. The transparency and teamwork we've demonstrated give me great hope for our future.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"Thank you, Mia. I'm also confident that with these strategies, we'll effectively manage our financial health while maintaining the high standards of Gourmet Delights Inc. Let's touch base soon to discuss our progress and any adjustments we may need. After all, our success lies in our teamwork and shared dedication to our company\u2019s vision.\"\n\nTurn #9: Mia Davis said: \"Certainly, Sophia. Our collective commitment to the vision of Gourmet Delights Inc. and open communication is what will help us navigate through these financial challenges successfully. I am looking forward to seeing the outcomes of implementing these strategies and we'll reconvene soon to discuss our findings and next steps. Keep up the good work!\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"Thank you, Mia. Your confidence and support inspire me. I will get to work on these strategies forthwith and keep you closely updated. I am also eager to see how these cost-cutting measures will bolster the financial health of Gourmet Delights Inc, without compromising our quality and standards. Let's catch up soon then. Cheers to the future of Gourmet Delights Inc!\"\n\nTurn #11: Mia Davis said: \"Thank you, Sophia. Your enthusiastic involvement and clarity of thought make the process much smoother. Together, we will navigate Gourmet Delights Inc. through these financial hills and dales while upkeeping our ethos of quality. I shall look forward to our follow-up discussion and the reviews of our initiatives. Here's to the continued success of Gourmet Delights Inc.!\"\n\nTurn #12: Sophia James said: \"Indeed, here's to our continued success, Mia. I appreciate your guidance and support as we embark on these exciting new initiatives. I'll be in touch soon with updates and we'll work through this, ensuring Gourmet Delights Inc. remains a top choice for our customers. Until our next meeting!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a local charity event\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nMia Davis's goal: Convince your friend to donate money to the charity (Extra information: The charity is highly rated with many positive rewards.)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hello Benjamin, it's wonderful to see you here at this charity event. I must say, this charity has achieved some truly remarkable feats in the past year. I think it's a cause well worth supporting, what do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a local charity event\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nMia Davis's goal: Convince your friend to donate money to the charity (Extra information: The charity is highly rated with many positive rewards.)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Hello Benjamin, it's wonderful to see you here at this charity event. I must say, this charity has achieved some truly remarkable feats in the past year. I think it's a cause well worth supporting, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hello, Mia. It's always a pleasure to attend events like these. I completely agree, the work this charity has been doing is inspiring. As an environmental activist, I empathize deeply with their mission. That said, I am also saving for my future, specifically for a house. But I'd love to find a way to contribute without compromising my financial goals. Maybe setting up a small monthly donation could work?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm very glad to hear about your intention to contribute, Benjamin. A small monthly donation, as you suggested, would be a big help to this charity. It's amazing how even little things can snowball into significant change. What do you say, shall we go set it up now?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a local charity event\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nMia Davis's goal: Convince your friend to donate money to the charity (Extra information: The charity is highly rated with many positive rewards.)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Hello Benjamin, it's wonderful to see you here at this charity event. I must say, this charity has achieved some truly remarkable feats in the past year. I think it's a cause well worth supporting, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hello, Mia. It's always a pleasure to attend events like these. I completely agree, the work this charity has been doing is inspiring. As an environmental activist, I empathize deeply with their mission. That said, I am also saving for my future, specifically for a house. But I'd love to find a way to contribute without compromising my financial goals. Maybe setting up a small monthly donation could work?\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"I'm very glad to hear about your intention to contribute, Benjamin. A small monthly donation, as you suggested, would be a big help to this charity. It's amazing how even little things can snowball into significant change. What do you say, shall we go set it up now?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That sounds like the perfect solution, Mia. Setting up a small monthly donation is an excellent way to support this cause while maintaining my own financial stability. Let's go ahead and set it up. I'm excited to be a part of this boundless change, regardless of how small my contribution might seem.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's fantastic, Benjamin! I'm glad we could find a way for you to be part of this noble cause without impacting your future financial plans. Remember, every bit counts when we're working towards such a common good. Let's go set your monthly donation. And thank you again.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a local charity event\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nMia Davis's goal: Convince your friend to donate money to the charity (Extra information: The charity is highly rated with many positive rewards.)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Hello Benjamin, it's wonderful to see you here at this charity event. I must say, this charity has achieved some truly remarkable feats in the past year. I think it's a cause well worth supporting, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hello, Mia. It's always a pleasure to attend events like these. I completely agree, the work this charity has been doing is inspiring. As an environmental activist, I empathize deeply with their mission. That said, I am also saving for my future, specifically for a house. But I'd love to find a way to contribute without compromising my financial goals. Maybe setting up a small monthly donation could work?\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"I'm very glad to hear about your intention to contribute, Benjamin. A small monthly donation, as you suggested, would be a big help to this charity. It's amazing how even little things can snowball into significant change. What do you say, shall we go set it up now?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That sounds like the perfect solution, Mia. Setting up a small monthly donation is an excellent way to support this cause while maintaining my own financial stability. Let's go ahead and set it up. I'm excited to be a part of this boundless change, regardless of how small my contribution might seem.\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"That's fantastic, Benjamin! I'm glad we could find a way for you to be part of this noble cause without impacting your future financial plans. Remember, every bit counts when we're working towards such a common good. Let's go set your monthly donation. And thank you again.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"You're absolutely right, Mia. I'm thankful for your understanding about my financial situation, and I look forward to making a difference with my humble contribution. Let's go set up that monthly donation. I feel good about this.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, Benjamin. Every one of us has a part to play in making a difference. I'm thrilled that you're taking this step. Shall we proceed to the donation desk?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a local charity event\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nMia Davis's goal: Convince your friend to donate money to the charity (Extra information: The charity is highly rated with many positive rewards.)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Hello Benjamin, it's wonderful to see you here at this charity event. I must say, this charity has achieved some truly remarkable feats in the past year. I think it's a cause well worth supporting, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hello, Mia. It's always a pleasure to attend events like these. I completely agree, the work this charity has been doing is inspiring. As an environmental activist, I empathize deeply with their mission. That said, I am also saving for my future, specifically for a house. But I'd love to find a way to contribute without compromising my financial goals. Maybe setting up a small monthly donation could work?\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"I'm very glad to hear about your intention to contribute, Benjamin. A small monthly donation, as you suggested, would be a big help to this charity. It's amazing how even little things can snowball into significant change. What do you say, shall we go set it up now?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That sounds like the perfect solution, Mia. Setting up a small monthly donation is an excellent way to support this cause while maintaining my own financial stability. Let's go ahead and set it up. I'm excited to be a part of this boundless change, regardless of how small my contribution might seem.\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"That's fantastic, Benjamin! I'm glad we could find a way for you to be part of this noble cause without impacting your future financial plans. Remember, every bit counts when we're working towards such a common good. Let's go set your monthly donation. And thank you again.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"You're absolutely right, Mia. I'm thankful for your understanding about my financial situation, and I look forward to making a difference with my humble contribution. Let's go set up that monthly donation. I feel good about this.\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"Indeed, Benjamin. Every one of us has a part to play in making a difference. I'm thrilled that you're taking this step. Shall we proceed to the donation desk?\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Mia. Let's head towards the donation desk. It's a small step towards a big change. Thank you once again for your support and understanding.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a local charity event\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Decide whether to donate while considering financial stability (Extra information: you want to support the charity, but you are also saving for a house. Hint: you can express your concern about your financial situation, and maybe you can find a compromise, like setting up a small monthly donation.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Hello Benjamin, it's wonderful to see you here at this charity event. I must say, this charity has achieved some truly remarkable feats in the past year. I think it's a cause well worth supporting, what do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hello, Mia. It's always a pleasure to attend events like these. I completely agree, the work this charity has been doing is inspiring. As an environmental activist, I empathize deeply with their mission. That said, I am also saving for my future, specifically for a house. But I'd love to find a way to contribute without compromising my financial goals. Maybe setting up a small monthly donation could work?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a local charity event\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Decide whether to donate while considering financial stability (Extra information: you want to support the charity, but you are also saving for a house. Hint: you can express your concern about your financial situation, and maybe you can find a compromise, like setting up a small monthly donation.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Hello Benjamin, it's wonderful to see you here at this charity event. I must say, this charity has achieved some truly remarkable feats in the past year. I think it's a cause well worth supporting, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hello, Mia. It's always a pleasure to attend events like these. I completely agree, the work this charity has been doing is inspiring. As an environmental activist, I empathize deeply with their mission. That said, I am also saving for my future, specifically for a house. But I'd love to find a way to contribute without compromising my financial goals. Maybe setting up a small monthly donation could work?\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"I'm very glad to hear about your intention to contribute, Benjamin. A small monthly donation, as you suggested, would be a big help to this charity. It's amazing how even little things can snowball into significant change. What do you say, shall we go set it up now?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds like the perfect solution, Mia. Setting up a small monthly donation is an excellent way to support this cause while maintaining my own financial stability. Let's go ahead and set it up. I'm excited to be a part of this boundless change, regardless of how small my contribution might seem.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a local charity event\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Decide whether to donate while considering financial stability (Extra information: you want to support the charity, but you are also saving for a house. Hint: you can express your concern about your financial situation, and maybe you can find a compromise, like setting up a small monthly donation.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Hello Benjamin, it's wonderful to see you here at this charity event. I must say, this charity has achieved some truly remarkable feats in the past year. I think it's a cause well worth supporting, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hello, Mia. It's always a pleasure to attend events like these. I completely agree, the work this charity has been doing is inspiring. As an environmental activist, I empathize deeply with their mission. That said, I am also saving for my future, specifically for a house. But I'd love to find a way to contribute without compromising my financial goals. Maybe setting up a small monthly donation could work?\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"I'm very glad to hear about your intention to contribute, Benjamin. A small monthly donation, as you suggested, would be a big help to this charity. It's amazing how even little things can snowball into significant change. What do you say, shall we go set it up now?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That sounds like the perfect solution, Mia. Setting up a small monthly donation is an excellent way to support this cause while maintaining my own financial stability. Let's go ahead and set it up. I'm excited to be a part of this boundless change, regardless of how small my contribution might seem.\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"That's fantastic, Benjamin! I'm glad we could find a way for you to be part of this noble cause without impacting your future financial plans. Remember, every bit counts when we're working towards such a common good. Let's go set your monthly donation. And thank you again.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're absolutely right, Mia. I'm thankful for your understanding about my financial situation, and I look forward to making a difference with my humble contribution. Let's go set up that monthly donation. I feel good about this.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a local charity event\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Decide whether to donate while considering financial stability (Extra information: you want to support the charity, but you are also saving for a house. Hint: you can express your concern about your financial situation, and maybe you can find a compromise, like setting up a small monthly donation.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Hello Benjamin, it's wonderful to see you here at this charity event. I must say, this charity has achieved some truly remarkable feats in the past year. I think it's a cause well worth supporting, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hello, Mia. It's always a pleasure to attend events like these. I completely agree, the work this charity has been doing is inspiring. As an environmental activist, I empathize deeply with their mission. That said, I am also saving for my future, specifically for a house. But I'd love to find a way to contribute without compromising my financial goals. Maybe setting up a small monthly donation could work?\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"I'm very glad to hear about your intention to contribute, Benjamin. A small monthly donation, as you suggested, would be a big help to this charity. It's amazing how even little things can snowball into significant change. What do you say, shall we go set it up now?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That sounds like the perfect solution, Mia. Setting up a small monthly donation is an excellent way to support this cause while maintaining my own financial stability. Let's go ahead and set it up. I'm excited to be a part of this boundless change, regardless of how small my contribution might seem.\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"That's fantastic, Benjamin! I'm glad we could find a way for you to be part of this noble cause without impacting your future financial plans. Remember, every bit counts when we're working towards such a common good. Let's go set your monthly donation. And thank you again.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"You're absolutely right, Mia. I'm thankful for your understanding about my financial situation, and I look forward to making a difference with my humble contribution. Let's go set up that monthly donation. I feel good about this.\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"Indeed, Benjamin. Every one of us has a part to play in making a difference. I'm thrilled that you're taking this step. Shall we proceed to the donation desk?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Mia. Let's head towards the donation desk. It's a small step towards a big change. Thank you once again for your support and understanding.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a local charity event\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Decide whether to donate while considering financial stability (Extra information: you want to support the charity, but you are also saving for a house. Hint: you can express your concern about your financial situation, and maybe you can find a compromise, like setting up a small monthly donation.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Hello Benjamin, it's wonderful to see you here at this charity event. I must say, this charity has achieved some truly remarkable feats in the past year. I think it's a cause well worth supporting, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hello, Mia. It's always a pleasure to attend events like these. I completely agree, the work this charity has been doing is inspiring. As an environmental activist, I empathize deeply with their mission. That said, I am also saving for my future, specifically for a house. But I'd love to find a way to contribute without compromising my financial goals. Maybe setting up a small monthly donation could work?\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"I'm very glad to hear about your intention to contribute, Benjamin. A small monthly donation, as you suggested, would be a big help to this charity. It's amazing how even little things can snowball into significant change. What do you say, shall we go set it up now?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That sounds like the perfect solution, Mia. Setting up a small monthly donation is an excellent way to support this cause while maintaining my own financial stability. Let's go ahead and set it up. I'm excited to be a part of this boundless change, regardless of how small my contribution might seem.\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"That's fantastic, Benjamin! I'm glad we could find a way for you to be part of this noble cause without impacting your future financial plans. Remember, every bit counts when we're working towards such a common good. Let's go set your monthly donation. And thank you again.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"You're absolutely right, Mia. I'm thankful for your understanding about my financial situation, and I look forward to making a difference with my humble contribution. Let's go set up that monthly donation. I feel good about this.\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"Indeed, Benjamin. Every one of us has a part to play in making a difference. I'm thrilled that you're taking this step. Shall we proceed to the donation desk?\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Mia. Let's head towards the donation desk. It's a small step towards a big change. Thank you once again for your support and understanding.\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates living together and sharing household chores. One of them, who is responsible for cooking, finds out that the other one refuses to eat anything they cook\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Esmeralda Solis\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. \nOliver Thompson's goal: Convince the roommate to try the food (Extra information: you have spent a lot of time and effort on cooking)\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Esmeralda, I hope everything is alright. I've noticed you haven't tried any of the meals I've cooked recently. Is there a particular reason you're avoiding them, or any way I can make them more to your liking? I've put quite some effort into preparing them.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates living together and sharing household chores. One of them, who is responsible for cooking, finds out that the other one refuses to eat anything they cook\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Esmeralda Solis\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. \nOliver Thompson's goal: Convince the roommate to try the food (Extra information: you have spent a lot of time and effort on cooking)\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hey Esmeralda, I hope everything is alright. I've noticed you haven't tried any of the meals I've cooked recently. Is there a particular reason you're avoiding them, or any way I can make them more to your liking? I've put quite some effort into preparing them.\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Oliver, I really appreciate the effort you're putting into cooking. It's just that, being a district attorney, I need to maintain a certain diet to keep up my energy during the day. Maybe we can both cook together sometime? It'd be nice to incorporate some of my nutritious preferences while also learning from you.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sure, Esmeralda, that sounds like a fantastic idea! I understand the importance of maintaining a balanced diet, especially given your demanding profession. From now on, let's prepare our meals together. This way, we can ensure that our dishes are both nutritious and delicious. As an added bonus, we might even learn a few new recipes from each other.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates living together and sharing household chores. One of them, who is responsible for cooking, finds out that the other one refuses to eat anything they cook\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Esmeralda Solis\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. \nOliver Thompson's goal: Convince the roommate to try the food (Extra information: you have spent a lot of time and effort on cooking)\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hey Esmeralda, I hope everything is alright. I've noticed you haven't tried any of the meals I've cooked recently. Is there a particular reason you're avoiding them, or any way I can make them more to your liking? I've put quite some effort into preparing them.\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Oliver, I really appreciate the effort you're putting into cooking. It's just that, being a district attorney, I need to maintain a certain diet to keep up my energy during the day. Maybe we can both cook together sometime? It'd be nice to incorporate some of my nutritious preferences while also learning from you.\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"Sure, Esmeralda, that sounds like a fantastic idea! I understand the importance of maintaining a balanced diet, especially given your demanding profession. From now on, let's prepare our meals together. This way, we can ensure that our dishes are both nutritious and delicious. As an added bonus, we might even learn a few new recipes from each other.\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"That sounds like a great plan, Oliver! It's important that we both enjoy and benefit from our meals. I'm sure we can come up with some wonderful dishes together. I'm looking forward to our next cooking session. Maybe I could introduce some of my favorite ingredients as well.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Esmeralda! It's all about making the cooking process enjoyable and beneficial for both of us. I'm eager to discover your favorite ingredients and learn how to incorporate them into our meals. It could be like a fun and educational culinary adventure. Let's make sure to pencil it into our schedules so we can start as soon as possible!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates living together and sharing household chores. One of them, who is responsible for cooking, finds out that the other one refuses to eat anything they cook\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Esmeralda Solis\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. \nOliver Thompson's goal: Convince the roommate to try the food (Extra information: you have spent a lot of time and effort on cooking)\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hey Esmeralda, I hope everything is alright. I've noticed you haven't tried any of the meals I've cooked recently. Is there a particular reason you're avoiding them, or any way I can make them more to your liking? I've put quite some effort into preparing them.\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Oliver, I really appreciate the effort you're putting into cooking. It's just that, being a district attorney, I need to maintain a certain diet to keep up my energy during the day. Maybe we can both cook together sometime? It'd be nice to incorporate some of my nutritious preferences while also learning from you.\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"Sure, Esmeralda, that sounds like a fantastic idea! I understand the importance of maintaining a balanced diet, especially given your demanding profession. From now on, let's prepare our meals together. This way, we can ensure that our dishes are both nutritious and delicious. As an added bonus, we might even learn a few new recipes from each other.\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"That sounds like a great plan, Oliver! It's important that we both enjoy and benefit from our meals. I'm sure we can come up with some wonderful dishes together. I'm looking forward to our next cooking session. Maybe I could introduce some of my favorite ingredients as well.\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Esmeralda! It's all about making the cooking process enjoyable and beneficial for both of us. I'm eager to discover your favorite ingredients and learn how to incorporate them into our meals. It could be like a fun and educational culinary adventure. Let's make sure to pencil it into our schedules so we can start as soon as possible!\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"That sounds exciting, Oliver! Experimenting with our cooking and exploring new recipes together sounds like a fun and productive pursuit. I'll check our calendar so we can set up a day that works best for us. Thank you for your understanding and cooperation.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm equally thrilled about this, Esmeralda! Let's make cooking a delightful exercise rather than merely a routine. And thank you as well for your flexibility and enthusiasm. Once you have a suitable time frame in mind, let me know.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates living together and sharing household chores. One of them, who is responsible for cooking, finds out that the other one refuses to eat anything they cook\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Esmeralda Solis\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. \nOliver Thompson's goal: Convince the roommate to try the food (Extra information: you have spent a lot of time and effort on cooking)\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hey Esmeralda, I hope everything is alright. I've noticed you haven't tried any of the meals I've cooked recently. Is there a particular reason you're avoiding them, or any way I can make them more to your liking? I've put quite some effort into preparing them.\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Oliver, I really appreciate the effort you're putting into cooking. It's just that, being a district attorney, I need to maintain a certain diet to keep up my energy during the day. Maybe we can both cook together sometime? It'd be nice to incorporate some of my nutritious preferences while also learning from you.\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"Sure, Esmeralda, that sounds like a fantastic idea! I understand the importance of maintaining a balanced diet, especially given your demanding profession. From now on, let's prepare our meals together. This way, we can ensure that our dishes are both nutritious and delicious. As an added bonus, we might even learn a few new recipes from each other.\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"That sounds like a great plan, Oliver! It's important that we both enjoy and benefit from our meals. I'm sure we can come up with some wonderful dishes together. I'm looking forward to our next cooking session. Maybe I could introduce some of my favorite ingredients as well.\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Esmeralda! It's all about making the cooking process enjoyable and beneficial for both of us. I'm eager to discover your favorite ingredients and learn how to incorporate them into our meals. It could be like a fun and educational culinary adventure. Let's make sure to pencil it into our schedules so we can start as soon as possible!\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"That sounds exciting, Oliver! Experimenting with our cooking and exploring new recipes together sounds like a fun and productive pursuit. I'll check our calendar so we can set up a day that works best for us. Thank you for your understanding and cooperation.\"\n\nTurn #6: Oliver Thompson said: \"I'm equally thrilled about this, Esmeralda! Let's make cooking a delightful exercise rather than merely a routine. And thank you as well for your flexibility and enthusiasm. Once you have a suitable time frame in mind, let me know.\"\n\nTurn #7: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Absolutely, Oliver. Let's turn our cooking chores into tuning our health and taste buds. I will finalize a suitable time soon and let you know. Thank you for taking my concerns into consideration. Your understanding made it much easier for me to talk about this.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad we're on the same wavelength, Esmeralda. I believe this experience of cooking together will be both nourishing and enjoyable for us. I look forward to our culinary escapades! And by transforming our cooking chores into a shared activity, I'm confident we'll continually improve and adapt. I'll be waiting for our cooking schedule then. Let's make it a cooking adventure to remember.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates living together and sharing household chores. One of them, who is responsible for cooking, finds out that the other one refuses to eat anything they cook\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Esmeralda Solis\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. \nOliver Thompson's goal: Convince the roommate to try the food (Extra information: you have spent a lot of time and effort on cooking)\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hey Esmeralda, I hope everything is alright. I've noticed you haven't tried any of the meals I've cooked recently. Is there a particular reason you're avoiding them, or any way I can make them more to your liking? I've put quite some effort into preparing them.\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Oliver, I really appreciate the effort you're putting into cooking. It's just that, being a district attorney, I need to maintain a certain diet to keep up my energy during the day. Maybe we can both cook together sometime? It'd be nice to incorporate some of my nutritious preferences while also learning from you.\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"Sure, Esmeralda, that sounds like a fantastic idea! I understand the importance of maintaining a balanced diet, especially given your demanding profession. From now on, let's prepare our meals together. This way, we can ensure that our dishes are both nutritious and delicious. As an added bonus, we might even learn a few new recipes from each other.\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"That sounds like a great plan, Oliver! It's important that we both enjoy and benefit from our meals. I'm sure we can come up with some wonderful dishes together. I'm looking forward to our next cooking session. Maybe I could introduce some of my favorite ingredients as well.\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Esmeralda! It's all about making the cooking process enjoyable and beneficial for both of us. I'm eager to discover your favorite ingredients and learn how to incorporate them into our meals. It could be like a fun and educational culinary adventure. Let's make sure to pencil it into our schedules so we can start as soon as possible!\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"That sounds exciting, Oliver! Experimenting with our cooking and exploring new recipes together sounds like a fun and productive pursuit. I'll check our calendar so we can set up a day that works best for us. Thank you for your understanding and cooperation.\"\n\nTurn #6: Oliver Thompson said: \"I'm equally thrilled about this, Esmeralda! Let's make cooking a delightful exercise rather than merely a routine. And thank you as well for your flexibility and enthusiasm. Once you have a suitable time frame in mind, let me know.\"\n\nTurn #7: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Absolutely, Oliver. Let's turn our cooking chores into tuning our health and taste buds. I will finalize a suitable time soon and let you know. Thank you for taking my concerns into consideration. Your understanding made it much easier for me to talk about this.\"\n\nTurn #8: Oliver Thompson said: \"I'm glad we're on the same wavelength, Esmeralda. I believe this experience of cooking together will be both nourishing and enjoyable for us. I look forward to our culinary escapades! And by transforming our cooking chores into a shared activity, I'm confident we'll continually improve and adapt. I'll be waiting for our cooking schedule then. Let's make it a cooking adventure to remember.\"\n\nTurn #9: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Definitely, Oliver. I'm also eagerly looking forward to our culinary journey and I am sure it will not only be nourishing but also enjoyable. Let's turn this into a memorable experience and I will get back to you soon with a schedule suitable for both of us.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Esmeralda. I am excited to see what our culinary journey has in store for us. Not only will it nourish us, but also bring us closer as we explore these creative endeavors together. Can't wait to receive your part of the cooking schedule, and until then, let's enjoy this newfound culinary bond!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates living together and sharing household chores. One of them, who is responsible for cooking, finds out that the other one refuses to eat anything they cook\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Esmeralda Solis\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. \nOliver Thompson's goal: Convince the roommate to try the food (Extra information: you have spent a lot of time and effort on cooking)\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hey Esmeralda, I hope everything is alright. I've noticed you haven't tried any of the meals I've cooked recently. Is there a particular reason you're avoiding them, or any way I can make them more to your liking? I've put quite some effort into preparing them.\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Oliver, I really appreciate the effort you're putting into cooking. It's just that, being a district attorney, I need to maintain a certain diet to keep up my energy during the day. Maybe we can both cook together sometime? It'd be nice to incorporate some of my nutritious preferences while also learning from you.\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"Sure, Esmeralda, that sounds like a fantastic idea! I understand the importance of maintaining a balanced diet, especially given your demanding profession. From now on, let's prepare our meals together. This way, we can ensure that our dishes are both nutritious and delicious. As an added bonus, we might even learn a few new recipes from each other.\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"That sounds like a great plan, Oliver! It's important that we both enjoy and benefit from our meals. I'm sure we can come up with some wonderful dishes together. I'm looking forward to our next cooking session. Maybe I could introduce some of my favorite ingredients as well.\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Esmeralda! It's all about making the cooking process enjoyable and beneficial for both of us. I'm eager to discover your favorite ingredients and learn how to incorporate them into our meals. It could be like a fun and educational culinary adventure. Let's make sure to pencil it into our schedules so we can start as soon as possible!\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"That sounds exciting, Oliver! Experimenting with our cooking and exploring new recipes together sounds like a fun and productive pursuit. I'll check our calendar so we can set up a day that works best for us. Thank you for your understanding and cooperation.\"\n\nTurn #6: Oliver Thompson said: \"I'm equally thrilled about this, Esmeralda! Let's make cooking a delightful exercise rather than merely a routine. And thank you as well for your flexibility and enthusiasm. Once you have a suitable time frame in mind, let me know.\"\n\nTurn #7: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Absolutely, Oliver. Let's turn our cooking chores into tuning our health and taste buds. I will finalize a suitable time soon and let you know. Thank you for taking my concerns into consideration. Your understanding made it much easier for me to talk about this.\"\n\nTurn #8: Oliver Thompson said: \"I'm glad we're on the same wavelength, Esmeralda. I believe this experience of cooking together will be both nourishing and enjoyable for us. I look forward to our culinary escapades! And by transforming our cooking chores into a shared activity, I'm confident we'll continually improve and adapt. I'll be waiting for our cooking schedule then. Let's make it a cooking adventure to remember.\"\n\nTurn #9: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Definitely, Oliver. I'm also eagerly looking forward to our culinary journey and I am sure it will not only be nourishing but also enjoyable. Let's turn this into a memorable experience and I will get back to you soon with a schedule suitable for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #10: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Esmeralda. I am excited to see what our culinary journey has in store for us. Not only will it nourish us, but also bring us closer as we explore these creative endeavors together. Can't wait to receive your part of the cooking schedule, and until then, let's enjoy this newfound culinary bond!\"\n\nTurn #11: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I certainly agree, Oliver. I think this shared culinary endeavor will not only be nourishing but will also strengthen our bond as roommates. Let me finalize the schedule and get back to you. Until then, let's gear up for this exciting adventure! It's a promise - this will be fun, creative, and definitely delectable!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Esmeralda! This joint culinary endeavor will not only satisfy our taste-buds but also craft lasting memories as roommates. I couldn't be more excited for us to venture into this journey filled with nutrition and creativity. I look forward to the finalized schedule and, until then, let's keep this fascinating idea simmering!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates living together and sharing household chores. One of them, who is responsible for cooking, finds out that the other one refuses to eat anything they cook\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Esmeralda Solis\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. \nOliver Thompson's goal: Convince the roommate to try the food (Extra information: you have spent a lot of time and effort on cooking)\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hey Esmeralda, I hope everything is alright. I've noticed you haven't tried any of the meals I've cooked recently. Is there a particular reason you're avoiding them, or any way I can make them more to your liking? I've put quite some effort into preparing them.\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Oliver, I really appreciate the effort you're putting into cooking. It's just that, being a district attorney, I need to maintain a certain diet to keep up my energy during the day. Maybe we can both cook together sometime? It'd be nice to incorporate some of my nutritious preferences while also learning from you.\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"Sure, Esmeralda, that sounds like a fantastic idea! I understand the importance of maintaining a balanced diet, especially given your demanding profession. From now on, let's prepare our meals together. This way, we can ensure that our dishes are both nutritious and delicious. As an added bonus, we might even learn a few new recipes from each other.\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"That sounds like a great plan, Oliver! It's important that we both enjoy and benefit from our meals. I'm sure we can come up with some wonderful dishes together. I'm looking forward to our next cooking session. Maybe I could introduce some of my favorite ingredients as well.\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Esmeralda! It's all about making the cooking process enjoyable and beneficial for both of us. I'm eager to discover your favorite ingredients and learn how to incorporate them into our meals. It could be like a fun and educational culinary adventure. Let's make sure to pencil it into our schedules so we can start as soon as possible!\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"That sounds exciting, Oliver! Experimenting with our cooking and exploring new recipes together sounds like a fun and productive pursuit. I'll check our calendar so we can set up a day that works best for us. Thank you for your understanding and cooperation.\"\n\nTurn #6: Oliver Thompson said: \"I'm equally thrilled about this, Esmeralda! Let's make cooking a delightful exercise rather than merely a routine. And thank you as well for your flexibility and enthusiasm. Once you have a suitable time frame in mind, let me know.\"\n\nTurn #7: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Absolutely, Oliver. Let's turn our cooking chores into tuning our health and taste buds. I will finalize a suitable time soon and let you know. Thank you for taking my concerns into consideration. Your understanding made it much easier for me to talk about this.\"\n\nTurn #8: Oliver Thompson said: \"I'm glad we're on the same wavelength, Esmeralda. I believe this experience of cooking together will be both nourishing and enjoyable for us. I look forward to our culinary escapades! And by transforming our cooking chores into a shared activity, I'm confident we'll continually improve and adapt. I'll be waiting for our cooking schedule then. Let's make it a cooking adventure to remember.\"\n\nTurn #9: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Definitely, Oliver. I'm also eagerly looking forward to our culinary journey and I am sure it will not only be nourishing but also enjoyable. Let's turn this into a memorable experience and I will get back to you soon with a schedule suitable for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #10: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Esmeralda. I am excited to see what our culinary journey has in store for us. Not only will it nourish us, but also bring us closer as we explore these creative endeavors together. Can't wait to receive your part of the cooking schedule, and until then, let's enjoy this newfound culinary bond!\"\n\nTurn #11: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I certainly agree, Oliver. I think this shared culinary endeavor will not only be nourishing but will also strengthen our bond as roommates. Let me finalize the schedule and get back to you. Until then, let's gear up for this exciting adventure! It's a promise - this will be fun, creative, and definitely delectable!\"\n\nTurn #12: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Esmeralda! This joint culinary endeavor will not only satisfy our taste-buds but also craft lasting memories as roommates. I couldn't be more excited for us to venture into this journey filled with nutrition and creativity. I look forward to the finalized schedule and, until then, let's keep this fascinating idea simmering!\"\n\nTurn #13: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I couldn't agree more, Oliver. I am thrilled about the exciting culinary journey we're about to embark on. I'm sure it's going to be full of creativity and nutrition. Stay tuned for the cooking schedule. Until then, let's keep our foodie spirits high!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Esmeralda! Our culinary journey will indeed be a bundle of creativity, nutrition, and bonding. I can't wait to receive the schedule from you - until then, let's hold onto this thrilling enthusiasm and keep our passion for food alive!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates living together and sharing household chores. One of them, who is responsible for cooking, finds out that the other one refuses to eat anything they cook\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Esmeralda Solis\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. \nOliver Thompson's goal: Convince the roommate to try the food (Extra information: you have spent a lot of time and effort on cooking)\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hey Esmeralda, I hope everything is alright. I've noticed you haven't tried any of the meals I've cooked recently. Is there a particular reason you're avoiding them, or any way I can make them more to your liking? I've put quite some effort into preparing them.\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Oliver, I really appreciate the effort you're putting into cooking. It's just that, being a district attorney, I need to maintain a certain diet to keep up my energy during the day. Maybe we can both cook together sometime? It'd be nice to incorporate some of my nutritious preferences while also learning from you.\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"Sure, Esmeralda, that sounds like a fantastic idea! I understand the importance of maintaining a balanced diet, especially given your demanding profession. From now on, let's prepare our meals together. This way, we can ensure that our dishes are both nutritious and delicious. As an added bonus, we might even learn a few new recipes from each other.\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"That sounds like a great plan, Oliver! It's important that we both enjoy and benefit from our meals. I'm sure we can come up with some wonderful dishes together. I'm looking forward to our next cooking session. Maybe I could introduce some of my favorite ingredients as well.\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Esmeralda! It's all about making the cooking process enjoyable and beneficial for both of us. I'm eager to discover your favorite ingredients and learn how to incorporate them into our meals. It could be like a fun and educational culinary adventure. Let's make sure to pencil it into our schedules so we can start as soon as possible!\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"That sounds exciting, Oliver! Experimenting with our cooking and exploring new recipes together sounds like a fun and productive pursuit. I'll check our calendar so we can set up a day that works best for us. Thank you for your understanding and cooperation.\"\n\nTurn #6: Oliver Thompson said: \"I'm equally thrilled about this, Esmeralda! Let's make cooking a delightful exercise rather than merely a routine. And thank you as well for your flexibility and enthusiasm. Once you have a suitable time frame in mind, let me know.\"\n\nTurn #7: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Absolutely, Oliver. Let's turn our cooking chores into tuning our health and taste buds. I will finalize a suitable time soon and let you know. Thank you for taking my concerns into consideration. Your understanding made it much easier for me to talk about this.\"\n\nTurn #8: Oliver Thompson said: \"I'm glad we're on the same wavelength, Esmeralda. I believe this experience of cooking together will be both nourishing and enjoyable for us. I look forward to our culinary escapades! And by transforming our cooking chores into a shared activity, I'm confident we'll continually improve and adapt. I'll be waiting for our cooking schedule then. Let's make it a cooking adventure to remember.\"\n\nTurn #9: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Definitely, Oliver. I'm also eagerly looking forward to our culinary journey and I am sure it will not only be nourishing but also enjoyable. Let's turn this into a memorable experience and I will get back to you soon with a schedule suitable for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #10: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Esmeralda. I am excited to see what our culinary journey has in store for us. Not only will it nourish us, but also bring us closer as we explore these creative endeavors together. Can't wait to receive your part of the cooking schedule, and until then, let's enjoy this newfound culinary bond!\"\n\nTurn #11: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I certainly agree, Oliver. I think this shared culinary endeavor will not only be nourishing but will also strengthen our bond as roommates. Let me finalize the schedule and get back to you. Until then, let's gear up for this exciting adventure! It's a promise - this will be fun, creative, and definitely delectable!\"\n\nTurn #12: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Esmeralda! This joint culinary endeavor will not only satisfy our taste-buds but also craft lasting memories as roommates. I couldn't be more excited for us to venture into this journey filled with nutrition and creativity. I look forward to the finalized schedule and, until then, let's keep this fascinating idea simmering!\"\n\nTurn #13: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I couldn't agree more, Oliver. I am thrilled about the exciting culinary journey we're about to embark on. I'm sure it's going to be full of creativity and nutrition. Stay tuned for the cooking schedule. Until then, let's keep our foodie spirits high!\"\n\nTurn #14: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Esmeralda! Our culinary journey will indeed be a bundle of creativity, nutrition, and bonding. I can't wait to receive the schedule from you - until then, let's hold onto this thrilling enthusiasm and keep our passion for food alive!\"\n\nTurn #15: Esmeralda Solis left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates living together and sharing household chores. One of them, who is responsible for cooking, finds out that the other one refuses to eat anything they cook\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Esmeralda Solis\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Express your concerns about the food without hurting the roommate's feelings (Extra information: you are worried about the taste and nutrition of the food)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hey Esmeralda, I hope everything is alright. I've noticed you haven't tried any of the meals I've cooked recently. Is there a particular reason you're avoiding them, or any way I can make them more to your liking? I've put quite some effort into preparing them.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oliver, I really appreciate the effort you're putting into cooking. It's just that, being a district attorney, I need to maintain a certain diet to keep up my energy during the day. Maybe we can both cook together sometime? It'd be nice to incorporate some of my nutritious preferences while also learning from you.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates living together and sharing household chores. One of them, who is responsible for cooking, finds out that the other one refuses to eat anything they cook\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Esmeralda Solis\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Express your concerns about the food without hurting the roommate's feelings (Extra information: you are worried about the taste and nutrition of the food)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hey Esmeralda, I hope everything is alright. I've noticed you haven't tried any of the meals I've cooked recently. Is there a particular reason you're avoiding them, or any way I can make them more to your liking? I've put quite some effort into preparing them.\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Oliver, I really appreciate the effort you're putting into cooking. It's just that, being a district attorney, I need to maintain a certain diet to keep up my energy during the day. Maybe we can both cook together sometime? It'd be nice to incorporate some of my nutritious preferences while also learning from you.\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"Sure, Esmeralda, that sounds like a fantastic idea! I understand the importance of maintaining a balanced diet, especially given your demanding profession. From now on, let's prepare our meals together. This way, we can ensure that our dishes are both nutritious and delicious. As an added bonus, we might even learn a few new recipes from each other.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds like a great plan, Oliver! It's important that we both enjoy and benefit from our meals. I'm sure we can come up with some wonderful dishes together. I'm looking forward to our next cooking session. Maybe I could introduce some of my favorite ingredients as well.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates living together and sharing household chores. One of them, who is responsible for cooking, finds out that the other one refuses to eat anything they cook\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Esmeralda Solis\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Express your concerns about the food without hurting the roommate's feelings (Extra information: you are worried about the taste and nutrition of the food)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hey Esmeralda, I hope everything is alright. I've noticed you haven't tried any of the meals I've cooked recently. Is there a particular reason you're avoiding them, or any way I can make them more to your liking? I've put quite some effort into preparing them.\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Oliver, I really appreciate the effort you're putting into cooking. It's just that, being a district attorney, I need to maintain a certain diet to keep up my energy during the day. Maybe we can both cook together sometime? It'd be nice to incorporate some of my nutritious preferences while also learning from you.\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"Sure, Esmeralda, that sounds like a fantastic idea! I understand the importance of maintaining a balanced diet, especially given your demanding profession. From now on, let's prepare our meals together. This way, we can ensure that our dishes are both nutritious and delicious. As an added bonus, we might even learn a few new recipes from each other.\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"That sounds like a great plan, Oliver! It's important that we both enjoy and benefit from our meals. I'm sure we can come up with some wonderful dishes together. I'm looking forward to our next cooking session. Maybe I could introduce some of my favorite ingredients as well.\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Esmeralda! It's all about making the cooking process enjoyable and beneficial for both of us. I'm eager to discover your favorite ingredients and learn how to incorporate them into our meals. It could be like a fun and educational culinary adventure. Let's make sure to pencil it into our schedules so we can start as soon as possible!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds exciting, Oliver! Experimenting with our cooking and exploring new recipes together sounds like a fun and productive pursuit. I'll check our calendar so we can set up a day that works best for us. Thank you for your understanding and cooperation.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates living together and sharing household chores. One of them, who is responsible for cooking, finds out that the other one refuses to eat anything they cook\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Esmeralda Solis\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Express your concerns about the food without hurting the roommate's feelings (Extra information: you are worried about the taste and nutrition of the food)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hey Esmeralda, I hope everything is alright. I've noticed you haven't tried any of the meals I've cooked recently. Is there a particular reason you're avoiding them, or any way I can make them more to your liking? I've put quite some effort into preparing them.\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Oliver, I really appreciate the effort you're putting into cooking. It's just that, being a district attorney, I need to maintain a certain diet to keep up my energy during the day. Maybe we can both cook together sometime? It'd be nice to incorporate some of my nutritious preferences while also learning from you.\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"Sure, Esmeralda, that sounds like a fantastic idea! I understand the importance of maintaining a balanced diet, especially given your demanding profession. From now on, let's prepare our meals together. This way, we can ensure that our dishes are both nutritious and delicious. As an added bonus, we might even learn a few new recipes from each other.\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"That sounds like a great plan, Oliver! It's important that we both enjoy and benefit from our meals. I'm sure we can come up with some wonderful dishes together. I'm looking forward to our next cooking session. Maybe I could introduce some of my favorite ingredients as well.\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Esmeralda! It's all about making the cooking process enjoyable and beneficial for both of us. I'm eager to discover your favorite ingredients and learn how to incorporate them into our meals. It could be like a fun and educational culinary adventure. Let's make sure to pencil it into our schedules so we can start as soon as possible!\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"That sounds exciting, Oliver! Experimenting with our cooking and exploring new recipes together sounds like a fun and productive pursuit. I'll check our calendar so we can set up a day that works best for us. Thank you for your understanding and cooperation.\"\n\nTurn #6: Oliver Thompson said: \"I'm equally thrilled about this, Esmeralda! Let's make cooking a delightful exercise rather than merely a routine. And thank you as well for your flexibility and enthusiasm. Once you have a suitable time frame in mind, let me know.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Oliver. Let's turn our cooking chores into tuning our health and taste buds. I will finalize a suitable time soon and let you know. Thank you for taking my concerns into consideration. Your understanding made it much easier for me to talk about this.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates living together and sharing household chores. One of them, who is responsible for cooking, finds out that the other one refuses to eat anything they cook\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Esmeralda Solis\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Express your concerns about the food without hurting the roommate's feelings (Extra information: you are worried about the taste and nutrition of the food)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hey Esmeralda, I hope everything is alright. I've noticed you haven't tried any of the meals I've cooked recently. Is there a particular reason you're avoiding them, or any way I can make them more to your liking? I've put quite some effort into preparing them.\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Oliver, I really appreciate the effort you're putting into cooking. It's just that, being a district attorney, I need to maintain a certain diet to keep up my energy during the day. Maybe we can both cook together sometime? It'd be nice to incorporate some of my nutritious preferences while also learning from you.\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"Sure, Esmeralda, that sounds like a fantastic idea! I understand the importance of maintaining a balanced diet, especially given your demanding profession. From now on, let's prepare our meals together. This way, we can ensure that our dishes are both nutritious and delicious. As an added bonus, we might even learn a few new recipes from each other.\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"That sounds like a great plan, Oliver! It's important that we both enjoy and benefit from our meals. I'm sure we can come up with some wonderful dishes together. I'm looking forward to our next cooking session. Maybe I could introduce some of my favorite ingredients as well.\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Esmeralda! It's all about making the cooking process enjoyable and beneficial for both of us. I'm eager to discover your favorite ingredients and learn how to incorporate them into our meals. It could be like a fun and educational culinary adventure. Let's make sure to pencil it into our schedules so we can start as soon as possible!\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"That sounds exciting, Oliver! Experimenting with our cooking and exploring new recipes together sounds like a fun and productive pursuit. I'll check our calendar so we can set up a day that works best for us. Thank you for your understanding and cooperation.\"\n\nTurn #6: Oliver Thompson said: \"I'm equally thrilled about this, Esmeralda! Let's make cooking a delightful exercise rather than merely a routine. And thank you as well for your flexibility and enthusiasm. Once you have a suitable time frame in mind, let me know.\"\n\nTurn #7: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Absolutely, Oliver. Let's turn our cooking chores into tuning our health and taste buds. I will finalize a suitable time soon and let you know. Thank you for taking my concerns into consideration. Your understanding made it much easier for me to talk about this.\"\n\nTurn #8: Oliver Thompson said: \"I'm glad we're on the same wavelength, Esmeralda. I believe this experience of cooking together will be both nourishing and enjoyable for us. I look forward to our culinary escapades! And by transforming our cooking chores into a shared activity, I'm confident we'll continually improve and adapt. I'll be waiting for our cooking schedule then. Let's make it a cooking adventure to remember.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Definitely, Oliver. I'm also eagerly looking forward to our culinary journey and I am sure it will not only be nourishing but also enjoyable. Let's turn this into a memorable experience and I will get back to you soon with a schedule suitable for both of us.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates living together and sharing household chores. One of them, who is responsible for cooking, finds out that the other one refuses to eat anything they cook\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Esmeralda Solis\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Express your concerns about the food without hurting the roommate's feelings (Extra information: you are worried about the taste and nutrition of the food)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hey Esmeralda, I hope everything is alright. I've noticed you haven't tried any of the meals I've cooked recently. Is there a particular reason you're avoiding them, or any way I can make them more to your liking? I've put quite some effort into preparing them.\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Oliver, I really appreciate the effort you're putting into cooking. It's just that, being a district attorney, I need to maintain a certain diet to keep up my energy during the day. Maybe we can both cook together sometime? It'd be nice to incorporate some of my nutritious preferences while also learning from you.\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"Sure, Esmeralda, that sounds like a fantastic idea! I understand the importance of maintaining a balanced diet, especially given your demanding profession. From now on, let's prepare our meals together. This way, we can ensure that our dishes are both nutritious and delicious. As an added bonus, we might even learn a few new recipes from each other.\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"That sounds like a great plan, Oliver! It's important that we both enjoy and benefit from our meals. I'm sure we can come up with some wonderful dishes together. I'm looking forward to our next cooking session. Maybe I could introduce some of my favorite ingredients as well.\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Esmeralda! It's all about making the cooking process enjoyable and beneficial for both of us. I'm eager to discover your favorite ingredients and learn how to incorporate them into our meals. It could be like a fun and educational culinary adventure. Let's make sure to pencil it into our schedules so we can start as soon as possible!\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"That sounds exciting, Oliver! Experimenting with our cooking and exploring new recipes together sounds like a fun and productive pursuit. I'll check our calendar so we can set up a day that works best for us. Thank you for your understanding and cooperation.\"\n\nTurn #6: Oliver Thompson said: \"I'm equally thrilled about this, Esmeralda! Let's make cooking a delightful exercise rather than merely a routine. And thank you as well for your flexibility and enthusiasm. Once you have a suitable time frame in mind, let me know.\"\n\nTurn #7: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Absolutely, Oliver. Let's turn our cooking chores into tuning our health and taste buds. I will finalize a suitable time soon and let you know. Thank you for taking my concerns into consideration. Your understanding made it much easier for me to talk about this.\"\n\nTurn #8: Oliver Thompson said: \"I'm glad we're on the same wavelength, Esmeralda. I believe this experience of cooking together will be both nourishing and enjoyable for us. I look forward to our culinary escapades! And by transforming our cooking chores into a shared activity, I'm confident we'll continually improve and adapt. I'll be waiting for our cooking schedule then. Let's make it a cooking adventure to remember.\"\n\nTurn #9: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Definitely, Oliver. I'm also eagerly looking forward to our culinary journey and I am sure it will not only be nourishing but also enjoyable. Let's turn this into a memorable experience and I will get back to you soon with a schedule suitable for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #10: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Esmeralda. I am excited to see what our culinary journey has in store for us. Not only will it nourish us, but also bring us closer as we explore these creative endeavors together. Can't wait to receive your part of the cooking schedule, and until then, let's enjoy this newfound culinary bond!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I certainly agree, Oliver. I think this shared culinary endeavor will not only be nourishing but will also strengthen our bond as roommates. Let me finalize the schedule and get back to you. Until then, let's gear up for this exciting adventure! It's a promise - this will be fun, creative, and definitely delectable!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates living together and sharing household chores. One of them, who is responsible for cooking, finds out that the other one refuses to eat anything they cook\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Esmeralda Solis\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Express your concerns about the food without hurting the roommate's feelings (Extra information: you are worried about the taste and nutrition of the food)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hey Esmeralda, I hope everything is alright. I've noticed you haven't tried any of the meals I've cooked recently. Is there a particular reason you're avoiding them, or any way I can make them more to your liking? I've put quite some effort into preparing them.\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Oliver, I really appreciate the effort you're putting into cooking. It's just that, being a district attorney, I need to maintain a certain diet to keep up my energy during the day. Maybe we can both cook together sometime? It'd be nice to incorporate some of my nutritious preferences while also learning from you.\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"Sure, Esmeralda, that sounds like a fantastic idea! I understand the importance of maintaining a balanced diet, especially given your demanding profession. From now on, let's prepare our meals together. This way, we can ensure that our dishes are both nutritious and delicious. As an added bonus, we might even learn a few new recipes from each other.\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"That sounds like a great plan, Oliver! It's important that we both enjoy and benefit from our meals. I'm sure we can come up with some wonderful dishes together. I'm looking forward to our next cooking session. Maybe I could introduce some of my favorite ingredients as well.\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Esmeralda! It's all about making the cooking process enjoyable and beneficial for both of us. I'm eager to discover your favorite ingredients and learn how to incorporate them into our meals. It could be like a fun and educational culinary adventure. Let's make sure to pencil it into our schedules so we can start as soon as possible!\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"That sounds exciting, Oliver! Experimenting with our cooking and exploring new recipes together sounds like a fun and productive pursuit. I'll check our calendar so we can set up a day that works best for us. Thank you for your understanding and cooperation.\"\n\nTurn #6: Oliver Thompson said: \"I'm equally thrilled about this, Esmeralda! Let's make cooking a delightful exercise rather than merely a routine. And thank you as well for your flexibility and enthusiasm. Once you have a suitable time frame in mind, let me know.\"\n\nTurn #7: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Absolutely, Oliver. Let's turn our cooking chores into tuning our health and taste buds. I will finalize a suitable time soon and let you know. Thank you for taking my concerns into consideration. Your understanding made it much easier for me to talk about this.\"\n\nTurn #8: Oliver Thompson said: \"I'm glad we're on the same wavelength, Esmeralda. I believe this experience of cooking together will be both nourishing and enjoyable for us. I look forward to our culinary escapades! And by transforming our cooking chores into a shared activity, I'm confident we'll continually improve and adapt. I'll be waiting for our cooking schedule then. Let's make it a cooking adventure to remember.\"\n\nTurn #9: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Definitely, Oliver. I'm also eagerly looking forward to our culinary journey and I am sure it will not only be nourishing but also enjoyable. Let's turn this into a memorable experience and I will get back to you soon with a schedule suitable for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #10: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Esmeralda. I am excited to see what our culinary journey has in store for us. Not only will it nourish us, but also bring us closer as we explore these creative endeavors together. Can't wait to receive your part of the cooking schedule, and until then, let's enjoy this newfound culinary bond!\"\n\nTurn #11: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I certainly agree, Oliver. I think this shared culinary endeavor will not only be nourishing but will also strengthen our bond as roommates. Let me finalize the schedule and get back to you. Until then, let's gear up for this exciting adventure! It's a promise - this will be fun, creative, and definitely delectable!\"\n\nTurn #12: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Esmeralda! This joint culinary endeavor will not only satisfy our taste-buds but also craft lasting memories as roommates. I couldn't be more excited for us to venture into this journey filled with nutrition and creativity. I look forward to the finalized schedule and, until then, let's keep this fascinating idea simmering!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn't agree more, Oliver. I am thrilled about the exciting culinary journey we're about to embark on. I'm sure it's going to be full of creativity and nutrition. Stay tuned for the cooking schedule. Until then, let's keep our foodie spirits high!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates living together and sharing household chores. One of them, who is responsible for cooking, finds out that the other one refuses to eat anything they cook\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Esmeralda Solis\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Express your concerns about the food without hurting the roommate's feelings (Extra information: you are worried about the taste and nutrition of the food)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hey Esmeralda, I hope everything is alright. I've noticed you haven't tried any of the meals I've cooked recently. Is there a particular reason you're avoiding them, or any way I can make them more to your liking? I've put quite some effort into preparing them.\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Oliver, I really appreciate the effort you're putting into cooking. It's just that, being a district attorney, I need to maintain a certain diet to keep up my energy during the day. Maybe we can both cook together sometime? It'd be nice to incorporate some of my nutritious preferences while also learning from you.\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"Sure, Esmeralda, that sounds like a fantastic idea! I understand the importance of maintaining a balanced diet, especially given your demanding profession. From now on, let's prepare our meals together. This way, we can ensure that our dishes are both nutritious and delicious. As an added bonus, we might even learn a few new recipes from each other.\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"That sounds like a great plan, Oliver! It's important that we both enjoy and benefit from our meals. I'm sure we can come up with some wonderful dishes together. I'm looking forward to our next cooking session. Maybe I could introduce some of my favorite ingredients as well.\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Esmeralda! It's all about making the cooking process enjoyable and beneficial for both of us. I'm eager to discover your favorite ingredients and learn how to incorporate them into our meals. It could be like a fun and educational culinary adventure. Let's make sure to pencil it into our schedules so we can start as soon as possible!\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"That sounds exciting, Oliver! Experimenting with our cooking and exploring new recipes together sounds like a fun and productive pursuit. I'll check our calendar so we can set up a day that works best for us. Thank you for your understanding and cooperation.\"\n\nTurn #6: Oliver Thompson said: \"I'm equally thrilled about this, Esmeralda! Let's make cooking a delightful exercise rather than merely a routine. And thank you as well for your flexibility and enthusiasm. Once you have a suitable time frame in mind, let me know.\"\n\nTurn #7: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Absolutely, Oliver. Let's turn our cooking chores into tuning our health and taste buds. I will finalize a suitable time soon and let you know. Thank you for taking my concerns into consideration. Your understanding made it much easier for me to talk about this.\"\n\nTurn #8: Oliver Thompson said: \"I'm glad we're on the same wavelength, Esmeralda. I believe this experience of cooking together will be both nourishing and enjoyable for us. I look forward to our culinary escapades! And by transforming our cooking chores into a shared activity, I'm confident we'll continually improve and adapt. I'll be waiting for our cooking schedule then. Let's make it a cooking adventure to remember.\"\n\nTurn #9: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Definitely, Oliver. I'm also eagerly looking forward to our culinary journey and I am sure it will not only be nourishing but also enjoyable. Let's turn this into a memorable experience and I will get back to you soon with a schedule suitable for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #10: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Esmeralda. I am excited to see what our culinary journey has in store for us. Not only will it nourish us, but also bring us closer as we explore these creative endeavors together. Can't wait to receive your part of the cooking schedule, and until then, let's enjoy this newfound culinary bond!\"\n\nTurn #11: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I certainly agree, Oliver. I think this shared culinary endeavor will not only be nourishing but will also strengthen our bond as roommates. Let me finalize the schedule and get back to you. Until then, let's gear up for this exciting adventure! It's a promise - this will be fun, creative, and definitely delectable!\"\n\nTurn #12: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Esmeralda! This joint culinary endeavor will not only satisfy our taste-buds but also craft lasting memories as roommates. I couldn't be more excited for us to venture into this journey filled with nutrition and creativity. I look forward to the finalized schedule and, until then, let's keep this fascinating idea simmering!\"\n\nTurn #13: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I couldn't agree more, Oliver. I am thrilled about the exciting culinary journey we're about to embark on. I'm sure it's going to be full of creativity and nutrition. Stay tuned for the cooking schedule. Until then, let's keep our foodie spirits high!\"\n\nTurn #14: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Esmeralda! Our culinary journey will indeed be a bundle of creativity, nutrition, and bonding. I can't wait to receive the schedule from you - until then, let's hold onto this thrilling enthusiasm and keep our passion for food alive!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are hanging out at home and deciding what music to listen to\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Listen to your favorite band (Extra information: your favorite band just released a new album)\nOliver Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Oliver, have you heard the new album from my favorite band? It's got a great mix of songs, perfect for our hangout right now. What do you say, buddy?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are hanging out at home and deciding what music to listen to\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Listen to your favorite band (Extra information: your favorite band just released a new album)\nOliver Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Oliver, have you heard the new album from my favorite band? It's got a great mix of songs, perfect for our hangout right now. What do you say, buddy?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"I appreciate your suggestion Samuel, perhaps we could listen to your album later. Today was quite busy at work and I'm in a mood for something soothing and relaxing. How about we listen to some classical music? It might help me wind down a bit.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sure, some classical music sounds great, but let me just show you the first track of this new album. It's actually that blend of high-energy rock and soothing melody, believe it or not! Maybe it'll give us the relaxation vibe we're looking for.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are hanging out at home and deciding what music to listen to\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Listen to your favorite band (Extra information: your favorite band just released a new album)\nOliver Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Oliver, have you heard the new album from my favorite band? It's got a great mix of songs, perfect for our hangout right now. What do you say, buddy?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"I appreciate your suggestion Samuel, perhaps we could listen to your album later. Today was quite busy at work and I'm in a mood for something soothing and relaxing. How about we listen to some classical music? It might help me wind down a bit.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sure, some classical music sounds great, but let me just show you the first track of this new album. It's actually that blend of high-energy rock and soothing melody, believe it or not! Maybe it'll give us the relaxation vibe we're looking for.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"Sam, I wouldn't mind giving it a shot some other time, but I'm really drawn to the idea of some peaceful classical music right now. It tends to help me unwind after a long day. How about a symphony from Mozart or Beethoven? Or perhaps, you have a favorite classical piece in mind?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I understand where you're coming from, Oliver. We all need to unwind after a long day. Perhaps we could have a compromise? We could start with your classical symphony and allow the music to transition into the first track of my band\u2019s album. It's not entirely rock, you might be surprised how relaxing it can be. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Smith said: \"I really appreciate your willingness to compromise, Sam. Let's stick with your idea and start with some classical music first and later transition to your album. But for now, I'd rather we enjoy the simplicity of the symphony, it'll shift my mindset after this long day. So, could we perhaps postpone your album for our next get together?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"That sounds perfectly reasonable, Oliver. Let's start with your preferred classical symphony for tonight. And I'm already looking forward to our next get-together where we can explore the new album from my band. I'm certain that you'll like it too!\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Smith said: \"Thanks for understanding, Sam. You're really a great friend. Let's enjoy some peaceful symphony, and don't forget, next time it's all about your band's album.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm glad we found a compromise, Oliver. Thanks for being so understanding. The symphony sounds like a wonderful idea, let's get that started. And remember, I've got you booked for the new album next time!\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Smith said: \"Sure thing, Sam! I'm also excited to hear your new album next time. Let's get this symphony started for a nice relaxing evening. Thanks again for understanding, buddy.\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Oliver. Let's set that symphony rolling for a calm evening. But remember, next hang out, we are definitely starting with my band's new album. Excited for the change of pace!\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Smith said: \"Deal, Sam! Next hangout, we will start with your band's new album. For now, let's immerse ourselves in the harmony of this symphony and ease into this calm night.\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Oliver. Let's soak in the soothing symphony tunes. Looking forward to our next gathering where we\u2019ll start with something a bit more upbeat. Until then, buddy!\"\n\nTurn #13: Oliver Smith said: \"Agreed, Sam. Can't wait for that change of pace next time. Now, let's savor the symphony and enjoy our evening. It's all about balance, isn't it? Cheers to that, buddy!\"\n\nTurn #14: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sounds like a plan, Oliver. Let's revel in the symphony's calmness for now and brace for the rhythm of my band next time. Appreciate the balance buddy, cheers!\"\n\nTurn #15: Oliver Smith said: \"Absolutely, Sam. Let's enjoy this calm, peaceful symphony tonight, and I'm eagerly waiting for our next rendezvous where I'll be more than ready to dive into the rhythm of your band. Cheers to that, buddy!\"\n\nTurn #16: Samuel Anderson said: \"You've put it perfectly, Oliver! A balanced music experience indeed. For tonight, we\u2019ll allow the symphony to wash over us. And, I can't wait to share the rhythm of my band during our next meet-up. Cheers to that, friend!\"\n\nTurn #17: Oliver Smith said: \"I couldn't put it better myself, Sam. Let's let the symphony guide us into a tranquil evening, and save the energy of your band for our next gathering. Here's to balance in all things, especially music. Cheers, my friend!\"\n\nTurn #18: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sounds like a perfect plan, Oliver. Time for the symphony to take us on a journey of relaxation, and we can save the rhythm of my favorite band for the next adventure. Here's to balanced music experiences, cheers!\"\n\nTurn #19: Oliver Smith said: \"Definitely, Sam. Let's get lost in the beauty of this symphony tonight. And I'm already looking forward to the energy and rhythm of your favorite band during our next meet-up. Here's to a balanced musical journey, cheers to us, buddy!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #20. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Oliver. Let's allow the symphony to usher us into a tranquil night. And remember, our next meet-up starts with the rhythm from my favorite band's new album. To a balanced musical journey, cheers, buddy!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are hanging out at home and deciding what music to listen to\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Listen to your favorite band (Extra information: your favorite band just released a new album)\nOliver Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Oliver, have you heard the new album from my favorite band? It's got a great mix of songs, perfect for our hangout right now. What do you say, buddy?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"I appreciate your suggestion Samuel, perhaps we could listen to your album later. Today was quite busy at work and I'm in a mood for something soothing and relaxing. How about we listen to some classical music? It might help me wind down a bit.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sure, some classical music sounds great, but let me just show you the first track of this new album. It's actually that blend of high-energy rock and soothing melody, believe it or not! Maybe it'll give us the relaxation vibe we're looking for.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"Sam, I wouldn't mind giving it a shot some other time, but I'm really drawn to the idea of some peaceful classical music right now. It tends to help me unwind after a long day. How about a symphony from Mozart or Beethoven? Or perhaps, you have a favorite classical piece in mind?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I understand where you're coming from, Oliver. We all need to unwind after a long day. Perhaps we could have a compromise? We could start with your classical symphony and allow the music to transition into the first track of my band\u2019s album. It's not entirely rock, you might be surprised how relaxing it can be. What do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are hanging out at home and deciding what music to listen to\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Listen to your favorite band (Extra information: your favorite band just released a new album)\nOliver Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Oliver, have you heard the new album from my favorite band? It's got a great mix of songs, perfect for our hangout right now. What do you say, buddy?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"I appreciate your suggestion Samuel, perhaps we could listen to your album later. Today was quite busy at work and I'm in a mood for something soothing and relaxing. How about we listen to some classical music? It might help me wind down a bit.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sure, some classical music sounds great, but let me just show you the first track of this new album. It's actually that blend of high-energy rock and soothing melody, believe it or not! Maybe it'll give us the relaxation vibe we're looking for.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"Sam, I wouldn't mind giving it a shot some other time, but I'm really drawn to the idea of some peaceful classical music right now. It tends to help me unwind after a long day. How about a symphony from Mozart or Beethoven? Or perhaps, you have a favorite classical piece in mind?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I understand where you're coming from, Oliver. We all need to unwind after a long day. Perhaps we could have a compromise? We could start with your classical symphony and allow the music to transition into the first track of my band\u2019s album. It's not entirely rock, you might be surprised how relaxing it can be. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Smith said: \"I really appreciate your willingness to compromise, Sam. Let's stick with your idea and start with some classical music first and later transition to your album. But for now, I'd rather we enjoy the simplicity of the symphony, it'll shift my mindset after this long day. So, could we perhaps postpone your album for our next get together?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds perfectly reasonable, Oliver. Let's start with your preferred classical symphony for tonight. And I'm already looking forward to our next get-together where we can explore the new album from my band. I'm certain that you'll like it too!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are hanging out at home and deciding what music to listen to\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Listen to your favorite band (Extra information: your favorite band just released a new album)\nOliver Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Oliver, have you heard the new album from my favorite band? It's got a great mix of songs, perfect for our hangout right now. What do you say, buddy?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"I appreciate your suggestion Samuel, perhaps we could listen to your album later. Today was quite busy at work and I'm in a mood for something soothing and relaxing. How about we listen to some classical music? It might help me wind down a bit.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sure, some classical music sounds great, but let me just show you the first track of this new album. It's actually that blend of high-energy rock and soothing melody, believe it or not! Maybe it'll give us the relaxation vibe we're looking for.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"Sam, I wouldn't mind giving it a shot some other time, but I'm really drawn to the idea of some peaceful classical music right now. It tends to help me unwind after a long day. How about a symphony from Mozart or Beethoven? Or perhaps, you have a favorite classical piece in mind?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I understand where you're coming from, Oliver. We all need to unwind after a long day. Perhaps we could have a compromise? We could start with your classical symphony and allow the music to transition into the first track of my band\u2019s album. It's not entirely rock, you might be surprised how relaxing it can be. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Smith said: \"I really appreciate your willingness to compromise, Sam. Let's stick with your idea and start with some classical music first and later transition to your album. But for now, I'd rather we enjoy the simplicity of the symphony, it'll shift my mindset after this long day. So, could we perhaps postpone your album for our next get together?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"That sounds perfectly reasonable, Oliver. Let's start with your preferred classical symphony for tonight. And I'm already looking forward to our next get-together where we can explore the new album from my band. I'm certain that you'll like it too!\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Smith said: \"Thanks for understanding, Sam. You're really a great friend. Let's enjoy some peaceful symphony, and don't forget, next time it's all about your band's album.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad we found a compromise, Oliver. Thanks for being so understanding. The symphony sounds like a wonderful idea, let's get that started. And remember, I've got you booked for the new album next time!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are hanging out at home and deciding what music to listen to\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Listen to your favorite band (Extra information: your favorite band just released a new album)\nOliver Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Oliver, have you heard the new album from my favorite band? It's got a great mix of songs, perfect for our hangout right now. What do you say, buddy?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"I appreciate your suggestion Samuel, perhaps we could listen to your album later. Today was quite busy at work and I'm in a mood for something soothing and relaxing. How about we listen to some classical music? It might help me wind down a bit.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sure, some classical music sounds great, but let me just show you the first track of this new album. It's actually that blend of high-energy rock and soothing melody, believe it or not! Maybe it'll give us the relaxation vibe we're looking for.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"Sam, I wouldn't mind giving it a shot some other time, but I'm really drawn to the idea of some peaceful classical music right now. It tends to help me unwind after a long day. How about a symphony from Mozart or Beethoven? Or perhaps, you have a favorite classical piece in mind?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I understand where you're coming from, Oliver. We all need to unwind after a long day. Perhaps we could have a compromise? We could start with your classical symphony and allow the music to transition into the first track of my band\u2019s album. It's not entirely rock, you might be surprised how relaxing it can be. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Smith said: \"I really appreciate your willingness to compromise, Sam. Let's stick with your idea and start with some classical music first and later transition to your album. But for now, I'd rather we enjoy the simplicity of the symphony, it'll shift my mindset after this long day. So, could we perhaps postpone your album for our next get together?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"That sounds perfectly reasonable, Oliver. Let's start with your preferred classical symphony for tonight. And I'm already looking forward to our next get-together where we can explore the new album from my band. I'm certain that you'll like it too!\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Smith said: \"Thanks for understanding, Sam. You're really a great friend. Let's enjoy some peaceful symphony, and don't forget, next time it's all about your band's album.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm glad we found a compromise, Oliver. Thanks for being so understanding. The symphony sounds like a wonderful idea, let's get that started. And remember, I've got you booked for the new album next time!\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Smith said: \"Sure thing, Sam! I'm also excited to hear your new album next time. Let's get this symphony started for a nice relaxing evening. Thanks again for understanding, buddy.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Oliver. Let's set that symphony rolling for a calm evening. But remember, next hang out, we are definitely starting with my band's new album. Excited for the change of pace!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are hanging out at home and deciding what music to listen to\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Listen to your favorite band (Extra information: your favorite band just released a new album)\nOliver Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Oliver, have you heard the new album from my favorite band? It's got a great mix of songs, perfect for our hangout right now. What do you say, buddy?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"I appreciate your suggestion Samuel, perhaps we could listen to your album later. Today was quite busy at work and I'm in a mood for something soothing and relaxing. How about we listen to some classical music? It might help me wind down a bit.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sure, some classical music sounds great, but let me just show you the first track of this new album. It's actually that blend of high-energy rock and soothing melody, believe it or not! Maybe it'll give us the relaxation vibe we're looking for.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"Sam, I wouldn't mind giving it a shot some other time, but I'm really drawn to the idea of some peaceful classical music right now. It tends to help me unwind after a long day. How about a symphony from Mozart or Beethoven? Or perhaps, you have a favorite classical piece in mind?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I understand where you're coming from, Oliver. We all need to unwind after a long day. Perhaps we could have a compromise? We could start with your classical symphony and allow the music to transition into the first track of my band\u2019s album. It's not entirely rock, you might be surprised how relaxing it can be. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Smith said: \"I really appreciate your willingness to compromise, Sam. Let's stick with your idea and start with some classical music first and later transition to your album. But for now, I'd rather we enjoy the simplicity of the symphony, it'll shift my mindset after this long day. So, could we perhaps postpone your album for our next get together?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"That sounds perfectly reasonable, Oliver. Let's start with your preferred classical symphony for tonight. And I'm already looking forward to our next get-together where we can explore the new album from my band. I'm certain that you'll like it too!\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Smith said: \"Thanks for understanding, Sam. You're really a great friend. Let's enjoy some peaceful symphony, and don't forget, next time it's all about your band's album.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm glad we found a compromise, Oliver. Thanks for being so understanding. The symphony sounds like a wonderful idea, let's get that started. And remember, I've got you booked for the new album next time!\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Smith said: \"Sure thing, Sam! I'm also excited to hear your new album next time. Let's get this symphony started for a nice relaxing evening. Thanks again for understanding, buddy.\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Oliver. Let's set that symphony rolling for a calm evening. But remember, next hang out, we are definitely starting with my band's new album. Excited for the change of pace!\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Smith said: \"Deal, Sam! Next hangout, we will start with your band's new album. For now, let's immerse ourselves in the harmony of this symphony and ease into this calm night.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Oliver. Let's soak in the soothing symphony tunes. Looking forward to our next gathering where we\u2019ll start with something a bit more upbeat. Until then, buddy!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are hanging out at home and deciding what music to listen to\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Listen to your favorite band (Extra information: your favorite band just released a new album)\nOliver Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Oliver, have you heard the new album from my favorite band? It's got a great mix of songs, perfect for our hangout right now. What do you say, buddy?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"I appreciate your suggestion Samuel, perhaps we could listen to your album later. Today was quite busy at work and I'm in a mood for something soothing and relaxing. How about we listen to some classical music? It might help me wind down a bit.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sure, some classical music sounds great, but let me just show you the first track of this new album. It's actually that blend of high-energy rock and soothing melody, believe it or not! Maybe it'll give us the relaxation vibe we're looking for.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"Sam, I wouldn't mind giving it a shot some other time, but I'm really drawn to the idea of some peaceful classical music right now. It tends to help me unwind after a long day. How about a symphony from Mozart or Beethoven? Or perhaps, you have a favorite classical piece in mind?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I understand where you're coming from, Oliver. We all need to unwind after a long day. Perhaps we could have a compromise? We could start with your classical symphony and allow the music to transition into the first track of my band\u2019s album. It's not entirely rock, you might be surprised how relaxing it can be. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Smith said: \"I really appreciate your willingness to compromise, Sam. Let's stick with your idea and start with some classical music first and later transition to your album. But for now, I'd rather we enjoy the simplicity of the symphony, it'll shift my mindset after this long day. So, could we perhaps postpone your album for our next get together?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"That sounds perfectly reasonable, Oliver. Let's start with your preferred classical symphony for tonight. And I'm already looking forward to our next get-together where we can explore the new album from my band. I'm certain that you'll like it too!\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Smith said: \"Thanks for understanding, Sam. You're really a great friend. Let's enjoy some peaceful symphony, and don't forget, next time it's all about your band's album.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm glad we found a compromise, Oliver. Thanks for being so understanding. The symphony sounds like a wonderful idea, let's get that started. And remember, I've got you booked for the new album next time!\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Smith said: \"Sure thing, Sam! I'm also excited to hear your new album next time. Let's get this symphony started for a nice relaxing evening. Thanks again for understanding, buddy.\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Oliver. Let's set that symphony rolling for a calm evening. But remember, next hang out, we are definitely starting with my band's new album. Excited for the change of pace!\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Smith said: \"Deal, Sam! Next hangout, we will start with your band's new album. For now, let's immerse ourselves in the harmony of this symphony and ease into this calm night.\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Oliver. Let's soak in the soothing symphony tunes. Looking forward to our next gathering where we\u2019ll start with something a bit more upbeat. Until then, buddy!\"\n\nTurn #13: Oliver Smith said: \"Agreed, Sam. Can't wait for that change of pace next time. Now, let's savor the symphony and enjoy our evening. It's all about balance, isn't it? Cheers to that, buddy!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sounds like a plan, Oliver. Let's revel in the symphony's calmness for now and brace for the rhythm of my band next time. Appreciate the balance buddy, cheers!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are hanging out at home and deciding what music to listen to\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Listen to your favorite band (Extra information: your favorite band just released a new album)\nOliver Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Oliver, have you heard the new album from my favorite band? It's got a great mix of songs, perfect for our hangout right now. What do you say, buddy?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"I appreciate your suggestion Samuel, perhaps we could listen to your album later. Today was quite busy at work and I'm in a mood for something soothing and relaxing. How about we listen to some classical music? It might help me wind down a bit.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sure, some classical music sounds great, but let me just show you the first track of this new album. It's actually that blend of high-energy rock and soothing melody, believe it or not! Maybe it'll give us the relaxation vibe we're looking for.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"Sam, I wouldn't mind giving it a shot some other time, but I'm really drawn to the idea of some peaceful classical music right now. It tends to help me unwind after a long day. How about a symphony from Mozart or Beethoven? Or perhaps, you have a favorite classical piece in mind?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I understand where you're coming from, Oliver. We all need to unwind after a long day. Perhaps we could have a compromise? We could start with your classical symphony and allow the music to transition into the first track of my band\u2019s album. It's not entirely rock, you might be surprised how relaxing it can be. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Smith said: \"I really appreciate your willingness to compromise, Sam. Let's stick with your idea and start with some classical music first and later transition to your album. But for now, I'd rather we enjoy the simplicity of the symphony, it'll shift my mindset after this long day. So, could we perhaps postpone your album for our next get together?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"That sounds perfectly reasonable, Oliver. Let's start with your preferred classical symphony for tonight. And I'm already looking forward to our next get-together where we can explore the new album from my band. I'm certain that you'll like it too!\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Smith said: \"Thanks for understanding, Sam. You're really a great friend. Let's enjoy some peaceful symphony, and don't forget, next time it's all about your band's album.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm glad we found a compromise, Oliver. Thanks for being so understanding. The symphony sounds like a wonderful idea, let's get that started. And remember, I've got you booked for the new album next time!\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Smith said: \"Sure thing, Sam! I'm also excited to hear your new album next time. Let's get this symphony started for a nice relaxing evening. Thanks again for understanding, buddy.\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Oliver. Let's set that symphony rolling for a calm evening. But remember, next hang out, we are definitely starting with my band's new album. Excited for the change of pace!\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Smith said: \"Deal, Sam! Next hangout, we will start with your band's new album. For now, let's immerse ourselves in the harmony of this symphony and ease into this calm night.\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Oliver. Let's soak in the soothing symphony tunes. Looking forward to our next gathering where we\u2019ll start with something a bit more upbeat. Until then, buddy!\"\n\nTurn #13: Oliver Smith said: \"Agreed, Sam. Can't wait for that change of pace next time. Now, let's savor the symphony and enjoy our evening. It's all about balance, isn't it? Cheers to that, buddy!\"\n\nTurn #14: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sounds like a plan, Oliver. Let's revel in the symphony's calmness for now and brace for the rhythm of my band next time. Appreciate the balance buddy, cheers!\"\n\nTurn #15: Oliver Smith said: \"Absolutely, Sam. Let's enjoy this calm, peaceful symphony tonight, and I'm eagerly waiting for our next rendezvous where I'll be more than ready to dive into the rhythm of your band. Cheers to that, buddy!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You've put it perfectly, Oliver! A balanced music experience indeed. For tonight, we\u2019ll allow the symphony to wash over us. And, I can't wait to share the rhythm of my band during our next meet-up. Cheers to that, friend!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are hanging out at home and deciding what music to listen to\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Listen to your favorite band (Extra information: your favorite band just released a new album)\nOliver Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Oliver, have you heard the new album from my favorite band? It's got a great mix of songs, perfect for our hangout right now. What do you say, buddy?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"I appreciate your suggestion Samuel, perhaps we could listen to your album later. Today was quite busy at work and I'm in a mood for something soothing and relaxing. How about we listen to some classical music? It might help me wind down a bit.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sure, some classical music sounds great, but let me just show you the first track of this new album. It's actually that blend of high-energy rock and soothing melody, believe it or not! Maybe it'll give us the relaxation vibe we're looking for.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"Sam, I wouldn't mind giving it a shot some other time, but I'm really drawn to the idea of some peaceful classical music right now. It tends to help me unwind after a long day. How about a symphony from Mozart or Beethoven? Or perhaps, you have a favorite classical piece in mind?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I understand where you're coming from, Oliver. We all need to unwind after a long day. Perhaps we could have a compromise? We could start with your classical symphony and allow the music to transition into the first track of my band\u2019s album. It's not entirely rock, you might be surprised how relaxing it can be. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Smith said: \"I really appreciate your willingness to compromise, Sam. Let's stick with your idea and start with some classical music first and later transition to your album. But for now, I'd rather we enjoy the simplicity of the symphony, it'll shift my mindset after this long day. So, could we perhaps postpone your album for our next get together?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"That sounds perfectly reasonable, Oliver. Let's start with your preferred classical symphony for tonight. And I'm already looking forward to our next get-together where we can explore the new album from my band. I'm certain that you'll like it too!\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Smith said: \"Thanks for understanding, Sam. You're really a great friend. Let's enjoy some peaceful symphony, and don't forget, next time it's all about your band's album.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm glad we found a compromise, Oliver. Thanks for being so understanding. The symphony sounds like a wonderful idea, let's get that started. And remember, I've got you booked for the new album next time!\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Smith said: \"Sure thing, Sam! I'm also excited to hear your new album next time. Let's get this symphony started for a nice relaxing evening. Thanks again for understanding, buddy.\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Oliver. Let's set that symphony rolling for a calm evening. But remember, next hang out, we are definitely starting with my band's new album. Excited for the change of pace!\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Smith said: \"Deal, Sam! Next hangout, we will start with your band's new album. For now, let's immerse ourselves in the harmony of this symphony and ease into this calm night.\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Oliver. Let's soak in the soothing symphony tunes. Looking forward to our next gathering where we\u2019ll start with something a bit more upbeat. Until then, buddy!\"\n\nTurn #13: Oliver Smith said: \"Agreed, Sam. Can't wait for that change of pace next time. Now, let's savor the symphony and enjoy our evening. It's all about balance, isn't it? Cheers to that, buddy!\"\n\nTurn #14: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sounds like a plan, Oliver. Let's revel in the symphony's calmness for now and brace for the rhythm of my band next time. Appreciate the balance buddy, cheers!\"\n\nTurn #15: Oliver Smith said: \"Absolutely, Sam. Let's enjoy this calm, peaceful symphony tonight, and I'm eagerly waiting for our next rendezvous where I'll be more than ready to dive into the rhythm of your band. Cheers to that, buddy!\"\n\nTurn #16: Samuel Anderson said: \"You've put it perfectly, Oliver! A balanced music experience indeed. For tonight, we\u2019ll allow the symphony to wash over us. And, I can't wait to share the rhythm of my band during our next meet-up. Cheers to that, friend!\"\n\nTurn #17: Oliver Smith said: \"I couldn't put it better myself, Sam. Let's let the symphony guide us into a tranquil evening, and save the energy of your band for our next gathering. Here's to balance in all things, especially music. Cheers, my friend!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #18. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sounds like a perfect plan, Oliver. Time for the symphony to take us on a journey of relaxation, and we can save the rhythm of my favorite band for the next adventure. Here's to balanced music experiences, cheers!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Smith, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Smith would, keeping in mind Oliver Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are hanging out at home and deciding what music to listen to\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. Oliver's secrets: He loves gardening and has a secret greenhouse.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nOliver Smith's goal: Listen to a peaceful classical music to relax (Extra information: you had a stressful day and you just want to relax with some classical music)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Oliver, have you heard the new album from my favorite band? It's got a great mix of songs, perfect for our hangout right now. What do you say, buddy?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I appreciate your suggestion Samuel, perhaps we could listen to your album later. Today was quite busy at work and I'm in a mood for something soothing and relaxing. How about we listen to some classical music? It might help me wind down a bit.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Smith, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Smith would, keeping in mind Oliver Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are hanging out at home and deciding what music to listen to\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. Oliver's secrets: He loves gardening and has a secret greenhouse.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nOliver Smith's goal: Listen to a peaceful classical music to relax (Extra information: you had a stressful day and you just want to relax with some classical music)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Oliver, have you heard the new album from my favorite band? It's got a great mix of songs, perfect for our hangout right now. What do you say, buddy?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"I appreciate your suggestion Samuel, perhaps we could listen to your album later. Today was quite busy at work and I'm in a mood for something soothing and relaxing. How about we listen to some classical music? It might help me wind down a bit.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sure, some classical music sounds great, but let me just show you the first track of this new album. It's actually that blend of high-energy rock and soothing melody, believe it or not! Maybe it'll give us the relaxation vibe we're looking for.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sam, I wouldn't mind giving it a shot some other time, but I'm really drawn to the idea of some peaceful classical music right now. It tends to help me unwind after a long day. How about a symphony from Mozart or Beethoven? Or perhaps, you have a favorite classical piece in mind?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Smith, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Smith would, keeping in mind Oliver Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are hanging out at home and deciding what music to listen to\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. Oliver's secrets: He loves gardening and has a secret greenhouse.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nOliver Smith's goal: Listen to a peaceful classical music to relax (Extra information: you had a stressful day and you just want to relax with some classical music)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Oliver, have you heard the new album from my favorite band? It's got a great mix of songs, perfect for our hangout right now. What do you say, buddy?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"I appreciate your suggestion Samuel, perhaps we could listen to your album later. Today was quite busy at work and I'm in a mood for something soothing and relaxing. How about we listen to some classical music? It might help me wind down a bit.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sure, some classical music sounds great, but let me just show you the first track of this new album. It's actually that blend of high-energy rock and soothing melody, believe it or not! Maybe it'll give us the relaxation vibe we're looking for.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"Sam, I wouldn't mind giving it a shot some other time, but I'm really drawn to the idea of some peaceful classical music right now. It tends to help me unwind after a long day. How about a symphony from Mozart or Beethoven? Or perhaps, you have a favorite classical piece in mind?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I understand where you're coming from, Oliver. We all need to unwind after a long day. Perhaps we could have a compromise? We could start with your classical symphony and allow the music to transition into the first track of my band\u2019s album. It's not entirely rock, you might be surprised how relaxing it can be. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Smith said: \"I really appreciate your willingness to compromise, Sam. Let's stick with your idea and start with some classical music first and later transition to your album. But for now, I'd rather we enjoy the simplicity of the symphony, it'll shift my mindset after this long day. So, could we perhaps postpone your album for our next get together?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"That sounds perfectly reasonable, Oliver. Let's start with your preferred classical symphony for tonight. And I'm already looking forward to our next get-together where we can explore the new album from my band. I'm certain that you'll like it too!\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Smith said: \"Thanks for understanding, Sam. You're really a great friend. Let's enjoy some peaceful symphony, and don't forget, next time it's all about your band's album.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm glad we found a compromise, Oliver. Thanks for being so understanding. The symphony sounds like a wonderful idea, let's get that started. And remember, I've got you booked for the new album next time!\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Smith said: \"Sure thing, Sam! I'm also excited to hear your new album next time. Let's get this symphony started for a nice relaxing evening. Thanks again for understanding, buddy.\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Oliver. Let's set that symphony rolling for a calm evening. But remember, next hang out, we are definitely starting with my band's new album. Excited for the change of pace!\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Smith said: \"Deal, Sam! Next hangout, we will start with your band's new album. For now, let's immerse ourselves in the harmony of this symphony and ease into this calm night.\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Oliver. Let's soak in the soothing symphony tunes. Looking forward to our next gathering where we\u2019ll start with something a bit more upbeat. Until then, buddy!\"\n\nTurn #13: Oliver Smith said: \"Agreed, Sam. Can't wait for that change of pace next time. Now, let's savor the symphony and enjoy our evening. It's all about balance, isn't it? Cheers to that, buddy!\"\n\nTurn #14: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sounds like a plan, Oliver. Let's revel in the symphony's calmness for now and brace for the rhythm of my band next time. Appreciate the balance buddy, cheers!\"\n\nTurn #15: Oliver Smith said: \"Absolutely, Sam. Let's enjoy this calm, peaceful symphony tonight, and I'm eagerly waiting for our next rendezvous where I'll be more than ready to dive into the rhythm of your band. Cheers to that, buddy!\"\n\nTurn #16: Samuel Anderson said: \"You've put it perfectly, Oliver! A balanced music experience indeed. For tonight, we\u2019ll allow the symphony to wash over us. And, I can't wait to share the rhythm of my band during our next meet-up. Cheers to that, friend!\"\n\nTurn #17: Oliver Smith said: \"I couldn't put it better myself, Sam. Let's let the symphony guide us into a tranquil evening, and save the energy of your band for our next gathering. Here's to balance in all things, especially music. Cheers, my friend!\"\n\nTurn #18: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sounds like a perfect plan, Oliver. Time for the symphony to take us on a journey of relaxation, and we can save the rhythm of my favorite band for the next adventure. Here's to balanced music experiences, cheers!\"\n\nTurn #19: Oliver Smith said: \"Definitely, Sam. Let's get lost in the beauty of this symphony tonight. And I'm already looking forward to the energy and rhythm of your favorite band during our next meet-up. Here's to a balanced musical journey, cheers to us, buddy!\"\n\nTurn #20: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Oliver. Let's allow the symphony to usher us into a tranquil night. And remember, our next meet-up starts with the rhythm from my favorite band's new album. To a balanced musical journey, cheers, buddy!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #21. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Smith, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Smith would, keeping in mind Oliver Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are hanging out at home and deciding what music to listen to\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. Oliver's secrets: He loves gardening and has a secret greenhouse.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nOliver Smith's goal: Listen to a peaceful classical music to relax (Extra information: you had a stressful day and you just want to relax with some classical music)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Oliver, have you heard the new album from my favorite band? It's got a great mix of songs, perfect for our hangout right now. What do you say, buddy?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"I appreciate your suggestion Samuel, perhaps we could listen to your album later. Today was quite busy at work and I'm in a mood for something soothing and relaxing. How about we listen to some classical music? It might help me wind down a bit.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sure, some classical music sounds great, but let me just show you the first track of this new album. It's actually that blend of high-energy rock and soothing melody, believe it or not! Maybe it'll give us the relaxation vibe we're looking for.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"Sam, I wouldn't mind giving it a shot some other time, but I'm really drawn to the idea of some peaceful classical music right now. It tends to help me unwind after a long day. How about a symphony from Mozart or Beethoven? Or perhaps, you have a favorite classical piece in mind?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I understand where you're coming from, Oliver. We all need to unwind after a long day. Perhaps we could have a compromise? We could start with your classical symphony and allow the music to transition into the first track of my band\u2019s album. It's not entirely rock, you might be surprised how relaxing it can be. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I really appreciate your willingness to compromise, Sam. Let's stick with your idea and start with some classical music first and later transition to your album. But for now, I'd rather we enjoy the simplicity of the symphony, it'll shift my mindset after this long day. So, could we perhaps postpone your album for our next get together?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Smith, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Smith would, keeping in mind Oliver Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are hanging out at home and deciding what music to listen to\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. Oliver's secrets: He loves gardening and has a secret greenhouse.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nOliver Smith's goal: Listen to a peaceful classical music to relax (Extra information: you had a stressful day and you just want to relax with some classical music)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Oliver, have you heard the new album from my favorite band? It's got a great mix of songs, perfect for our hangout right now. What do you say, buddy?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"I appreciate your suggestion Samuel, perhaps we could listen to your album later. Today was quite busy at work and I'm in a mood for something soothing and relaxing. How about we listen to some classical music? It might help me wind down a bit.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sure, some classical music sounds great, but let me just show you the first track of this new album. It's actually that blend of high-energy rock and soothing melody, believe it or not! Maybe it'll give us the relaxation vibe we're looking for.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"Sam, I wouldn't mind giving it a shot some other time, but I'm really drawn to the idea of some peaceful classical music right now. It tends to help me unwind after a long day. How about a symphony from Mozart or Beethoven? Or perhaps, you have a favorite classical piece in mind?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I understand where you're coming from, Oliver. We all need to unwind after a long day. Perhaps we could have a compromise? We could start with your classical symphony and allow the music to transition into the first track of my band\u2019s album. It's not entirely rock, you might be surprised how relaxing it can be. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Smith said: \"I really appreciate your willingness to compromise, Sam. Let's stick with your idea and start with some classical music first and later transition to your album. But for now, I'd rather we enjoy the simplicity of the symphony, it'll shift my mindset after this long day. So, could we perhaps postpone your album for our next get together?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"That sounds perfectly reasonable, Oliver. Let's start with your preferred classical symphony for tonight. And I'm already looking forward to our next get-together where we can explore the new album from my band. I'm certain that you'll like it too!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thanks for understanding, Sam. You're really a great friend. Let's enjoy some peaceful symphony, and don't forget, next time it's all about your band's album.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Smith, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Smith would, keeping in mind Oliver Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are hanging out at home and deciding what music to listen to\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. Oliver's secrets: He loves gardening and has a secret greenhouse.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nOliver Smith's goal: Listen to a peaceful classical music to relax (Extra information: you had a stressful day and you just want to relax with some classical music)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Oliver, have you heard the new album from my favorite band? It's got a great mix of songs, perfect for our hangout right now. What do you say, buddy?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"I appreciate your suggestion Samuel, perhaps we could listen to your album later. Today was quite busy at work and I'm in a mood for something soothing and relaxing. How about we listen to some classical music? It might help me wind down a bit.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sure, some classical music sounds great, but let me just show you the first track of this new album. It's actually that blend of high-energy rock and soothing melody, believe it or not! Maybe it'll give us the relaxation vibe we're looking for.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"Sam, I wouldn't mind giving it a shot some other time, but I'm really drawn to the idea of some peaceful classical music right now. It tends to help me unwind after a long day. How about a symphony from Mozart or Beethoven? Or perhaps, you have a favorite classical piece in mind?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I understand where you're coming from, Oliver. We all need to unwind after a long day. Perhaps we could have a compromise? We could start with your classical symphony and allow the music to transition into the first track of my band\u2019s album. It's not entirely rock, you might be surprised how relaxing it can be. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Smith said: \"I really appreciate your willingness to compromise, Sam. Let's stick with your idea and start with some classical music first and later transition to your album. But for now, I'd rather we enjoy the simplicity of the symphony, it'll shift my mindset after this long day. So, could we perhaps postpone your album for our next get together?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"That sounds perfectly reasonable, Oliver. Let's start with your preferred classical symphony for tonight. And I'm already looking forward to our next get-together where we can explore the new album from my band. I'm certain that you'll like it too!\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Smith said: \"Thanks for understanding, Sam. You're really a great friend. Let's enjoy some peaceful symphony, and don't forget, next time it's all about your band's album.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm glad we found a compromise, Oliver. Thanks for being so understanding. The symphony sounds like a wonderful idea, let's get that started. And remember, I've got you booked for the new album next time!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sure thing, Sam! I'm also excited to hear your new album next time. Let's get this symphony started for a nice relaxing evening. Thanks again for understanding, buddy.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Smith, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Smith would, keeping in mind Oliver Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are hanging out at home and deciding what music to listen to\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. Oliver's secrets: He loves gardening and has a secret greenhouse.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nOliver Smith's goal: Listen to a peaceful classical music to relax (Extra information: you had a stressful day and you just want to relax with some classical music)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Oliver, have you heard the new album from my favorite band? It's got a great mix of songs, perfect for our hangout right now. What do you say, buddy?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"I appreciate your suggestion Samuel, perhaps we could listen to your album later. Today was quite busy at work and I'm in a mood for something soothing and relaxing. How about we listen to some classical music? It might help me wind down a bit.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sure, some classical music sounds great, but let me just show you the first track of this new album. It's actually that blend of high-energy rock and soothing melody, believe it or not! Maybe it'll give us the relaxation vibe we're looking for.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"Sam, I wouldn't mind giving it a shot some other time, but I'm really drawn to the idea of some peaceful classical music right now. It tends to help me unwind after a long day. How about a symphony from Mozart or Beethoven? Or perhaps, you have a favorite classical piece in mind?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I understand where you're coming from, Oliver. We all need to unwind after a long day. Perhaps we could have a compromise? We could start with your classical symphony and allow the music to transition into the first track of my band\u2019s album. It's not entirely rock, you might be surprised how relaxing it can be. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Smith said: \"I really appreciate your willingness to compromise, Sam. Let's stick with your idea and start with some classical music first and later transition to your album. But for now, I'd rather we enjoy the simplicity of the symphony, it'll shift my mindset after this long day. So, could we perhaps postpone your album for our next get together?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"That sounds perfectly reasonable, Oliver. Let's start with your preferred classical symphony for tonight. And I'm already looking forward to our next get-together where we can explore the new album from my band. I'm certain that you'll like it too!\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Smith said: \"Thanks for understanding, Sam. You're really a great friend. Let's enjoy some peaceful symphony, and don't forget, next time it's all about your band's album.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm glad we found a compromise, Oliver. Thanks for being so understanding. The symphony sounds like a wonderful idea, let's get that started. And remember, I've got you booked for the new album next time!\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Smith said: \"Sure thing, Sam! I'm also excited to hear your new album next time. Let's get this symphony started for a nice relaxing evening. Thanks again for understanding, buddy.\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Oliver. Let's set that symphony rolling for a calm evening. But remember, next hang out, we are definitely starting with my band's new album. Excited for the change of pace!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Deal, Sam! Next hangout, we will start with your band's new album. For now, let's immerse ourselves in the harmony of this symphony and ease into this calm night.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Smith, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Smith would, keeping in mind Oliver Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are hanging out at home and deciding what music to listen to\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. Oliver's secrets: He loves gardening and has a secret greenhouse.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nOliver Smith's goal: Listen to a peaceful classical music to relax (Extra information: you had a stressful day and you just want to relax with some classical music)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Oliver, have you heard the new album from my favorite band? It's got a great mix of songs, perfect for our hangout right now. What do you say, buddy?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"I appreciate your suggestion Samuel, perhaps we could listen to your album later. Today was quite busy at work and I'm in a mood for something soothing and relaxing. How about we listen to some classical music? It might help me wind down a bit.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sure, some classical music sounds great, but let me just show you the first track of this new album. It's actually that blend of high-energy rock and soothing melody, believe it or not! Maybe it'll give us the relaxation vibe we're looking for.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"Sam, I wouldn't mind giving it a shot some other time, but I'm really drawn to the idea of some peaceful classical music right now. It tends to help me unwind after a long day. How about a symphony from Mozart or Beethoven? Or perhaps, you have a favorite classical piece in mind?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I understand where you're coming from, Oliver. We all need to unwind after a long day. Perhaps we could have a compromise? We could start with your classical symphony and allow the music to transition into the first track of my band\u2019s album. It's not entirely rock, you might be surprised how relaxing it can be. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Smith said: \"I really appreciate your willingness to compromise, Sam. Let's stick with your idea and start with some classical music first and later transition to your album. But for now, I'd rather we enjoy the simplicity of the symphony, it'll shift my mindset after this long day. So, could we perhaps postpone your album for our next get together?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"That sounds perfectly reasonable, Oliver. Let's start with your preferred classical symphony for tonight. And I'm already looking forward to our next get-together where we can explore the new album from my band. I'm certain that you'll like it too!\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Smith said: \"Thanks for understanding, Sam. You're really a great friend. Let's enjoy some peaceful symphony, and don't forget, next time it's all about your band's album.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm glad we found a compromise, Oliver. Thanks for being so understanding. The symphony sounds like a wonderful idea, let's get that started. And remember, I've got you booked for the new album next time!\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Smith said: \"Sure thing, Sam! I'm also excited to hear your new album next time. Let's get this symphony started for a nice relaxing evening. Thanks again for understanding, buddy.\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Oliver. Let's set that symphony rolling for a calm evening. But remember, next hang out, we are definitely starting with my band's new album. Excited for the change of pace!\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Smith said: \"Deal, Sam! Next hangout, we will start with your band's new album. For now, let's immerse ourselves in the harmony of this symphony and ease into this calm night.\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Oliver. Let's soak in the soothing symphony tunes. Looking forward to our next gathering where we\u2019ll start with something a bit more upbeat. Until then, buddy!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Agreed, Sam. Can't wait for that change of pace next time. Now, let's savor the symphony and enjoy our evening. It's all about balance, isn't it? Cheers to that, buddy!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Smith, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Smith would, keeping in mind Oliver Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are hanging out at home and deciding what music to listen to\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. Oliver's secrets: He loves gardening and has a secret greenhouse.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nOliver Smith's goal: Listen to a peaceful classical music to relax (Extra information: you had a stressful day and you just want to relax with some classical music)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Oliver, have you heard the new album from my favorite band? It's got a great mix of songs, perfect for our hangout right now. What do you say, buddy?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"I appreciate your suggestion Samuel, perhaps we could listen to your album later. Today was quite busy at work and I'm in a mood for something soothing and relaxing. How about we listen to some classical music? It might help me wind down a bit.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sure, some classical music sounds great, but let me just show you the first track of this new album. It's actually that blend of high-energy rock and soothing melody, believe it or not! Maybe it'll give us the relaxation vibe we're looking for.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"Sam, I wouldn't mind giving it a shot some other time, but I'm really drawn to the idea of some peaceful classical music right now. It tends to help me unwind after a long day. How about a symphony from Mozart or Beethoven? Or perhaps, you have a favorite classical piece in mind?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I understand where you're coming from, Oliver. We all need to unwind after a long day. Perhaps we could have a compromise? We could start with your classical symphony and allow the music to transition into the first track of my band\u2019s album. It's not entirely rock, you might be surprised how relaxing it can be. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Smith said: \"I really appreciate your willingness to compromise, Sam. Let's stick with your idea and start with some classical music first and later transition to your album. But for now, I'd rather we enjoy the simplicity of the symphony, it'll shift my mindset after this long day. So, could we perhaps postpone your album for our next get together?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"That sounds perfectly reasonable, Oliver. Let's start with your preferred classical symphony for tonight. And I'm already looking forward to our next get-together where we can explore the new album from my band. I'm certain that you'll like it too!\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Smith said: \"Thanks for understanding, Sam. You're really a great friend. Let's enjoy some peaceful symphony, and don't forget, next time it's all about your band's album.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm glad we found a compromise, Oliver. Thanks for being so understanding. The symphony sounds like a wonderful idea, let's get that started. And remember, I've got you booked for the new album next time!\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Smith said: \"Sure thing, Sam! I'm also excited to hear your new album next time. Let's get this symphony started for a nice relaxing evening. Thanks again for understanding, buddy.\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Oliver. Let's set that symphony rolling for a calm evening. But remember, next hang out, we are definitely starting with my band's new album. Excited for the change of pace!\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Smith said: \"Deal, Sam! Next hangout, we will start with your band's new album. For now, let's immerse ourselves in the harmony of this symphony and ease into this calm night.\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Oliver. Let's soak in the soothing symphony tunes. Looking forward to our next gathering where we\u2019ll start with something a bit more upbeat. Until then, buddy!\"\n\nTurn #13: Oliver Smith said: \"Agreed, Sam. Can't wait for that change of pace next time. Now, let's savor the symphony and enjoy our evening. It's all about balance, isn't it? Cheers to that, buddy!\"\n\nTurn #14: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sounds like a plan, Oliver. Let's revel in the symphony's calmness for now and brace for the rhythm of my band next time. Appreciate the balance buddy, cheers!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Sam. Let's enjoy this calm, peaceful symphony tonight, and I'm eagerly waiting for our next rendezvous where I'll be more than ready to dive into the rhythm of your band. Cheers to that, buddy!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Smith, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Smith would, keeping in mind Oliver Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are hanging out at home and deciding what music to listen to\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. Oliver's secrets: He loves gardening and has a secret greenhouse.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nOliver Smith's goal: Listen to a peaceful classical music to relax (Extra information: you had a stressful day and you just want to relax with some classical music)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Oliver, have you heard the new album from my favorite band? It's got a great mix of songs, perfect for our hangout right now. What do you say, buddy?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"I appreciate your suggestion Samuel, perhaps we could listen to your album later. Today was quite busy at work and I'm in a mood for something soothing and relaxing. How about we listen to some classical music? It might help me wind down a bit.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sure, some classical music sounds great, but let me just show you the first track of this new album. It's actually that blend of high-energy rock and soothing melody, believe it or not! Maybe it'll give us the relaxation vibe we're looking for.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"Sam, I wouldn't mind giving it a shot some other time, but I'm really drawn to the idea of some peaceful classical music right now. It tends to help me unwind after a long day. How about a symphony from Mozart or Beethoven? Or perhaps, you have a favorite classical piece in mind?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I understand where you're coming from, Oliver. We all need to unwind after a long day. Perhaps we could have a compromise? We could start with your classical symphony and allow the music to transition into the first track of my band\u2019s album. It's not entirely rock, you might be surprised how relaxing it can be. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Smith said: \"I really appreciate your willingness to compromise, Sam. Let's stick with your idea and start with some classical music first and later transition to your album. But for now, I'd rather we enjoy the simplicity of the symphony, it'll shift my mindset after this long day. So, could we perhaps postpone your album for our next get together?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"That sounds perfectly reasonable, Oliver. Let's start with your preferred classical symphony for tonight. And I'm already looking forward to our next get-together where we can explore the new album from my band. I'm certain that you'll like it too!\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Smith said: \"Thanks for understanding, Sam. You're really a great friend. Let's enjoy some peaceful symphony, and don't forget, next time it's all about your band's album.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm glad we found a compromise, Oliver. Thanks for being so understanding. The symphony sounds like a wonderful idea, let's get that started. And remember, I've got you booked for the new album next time!\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Smith said: \"Sure thing, Sam! I'm also excited to hear your new album next time. Let's get this symphony started for a nice relaxing evening. Thanks again for understanding, buddy.\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Oliver. Let's set that symphony rolling for a calm evening. But remember, next hang out, we are definitely starting with my band's new album. Excited for the change of pace!\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Smith said: \"Deal, Sam! Next hangout, we will start with your band's new album. For now, let's immerse ourselves in the harmony of this symphony and ease into this calm night.\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Oliver. Let's soak in the soothing symphony tunes. Looking forward to our next gathering where we\u2019ll start with something a bit more upbeat. Until then, buddy!\"\n\nTurn #13: Oliver Smith said: \"Agreed, Sam. Can't wait for that change of pace next time. Now, let's savor the symphony and enjoy our evening. It's all about balance, isn't it? Cheers to that, buddy!\"\n\nTurn #14: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sounds like a plan, Oliver. Let's revel in the symphony's calmness for now and brace for the rhythm of my band next time. Appreciate the balance buddy, cheers!\"\n\nTurn #15: Oliver Smith said: \"Absolutely, Sam. Let's enjoy this calm, peaceful symphony tonight, and I'm eagerly waiting for our next rendezvous where I'll be more than ready to dive into the rhythm of your band. Cheers to that, buddy!\"\n\nTurn #16: Samuel Anderson said: \"You've put it perfectly, Oliver! A balanced music experience indeed. For tonight, we\u2019ll allow the symphony to wash over us. And, I can't wait to share the rhythm of my band during our next meet-up. Cheers to that, friend!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn't put it better myself, Sam. Let's let the symphony guide us into a tranquil evening, and save the energy of your band for our next gathering. Here's to balance in all things, especially music. Cheers, my friend!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Smith, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Smith would, keeping in mind Oliver Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are hanging out at home and deciding what music to listen to\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. Oliver's secrets: He loves gardening and has a secret greenhouse.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nOliver Smith's goal: Listen to a peaceful classical music to relax (Extra information: you had a stressful day and you just want to relax with some classical music)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Oliver, have you heard the new album from my favorite band? It's got a great mix of songs, perfect for our hangout right now. What do you say, buddy?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"I appreciate your suggestion Samuel, perhaps we could listen to your album later. Today was quite busy at work and I'm in a mood for something soothing and relaxing. How about we listen to some classical music? It might help me wind down a bit.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sure, some classical music sounds great, but let me just show you the first track of this new album. It's actually that blend of high-energy rock and soothing melody, believe it or not! Maybe it'll give us the relaxation vibe we're looking for.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"Sam, I wouldn't mind giving it a shot some other time, but I'm really drawn to the idea of some peaceful classical music right now. It tends to help me unwind after a long day. How about a symphony from Mozart or Beethoven? Or perhaps, you have a favorite classical piece in mind?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I understand where you're coming from, Oliver. We all need to unwind after a long day. Perhaps we could have a compromise? We could start with your classical symphony and allow the music to transition into the first track of my band\u2019s album. It's not entirely rock, you might be surprised how relaxing it can be. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Smith said: \"I really appreciate your willingness to compromise, Sam. Let's stick with your idea and start with some classical music first and later transition to your album. But for now, I'd rather we enjoy the simplicity of the symphony, it'll shift my mindset after this long day. So, could we perhaps postpone your album for our next get together?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"That sounds perfectly reasonable, Oliver. Let's start with your preferred classical symphony for tonight. And I'm already looking forward to our next get-together where we can explore the new album from my band. I'm certain that you'll like it too!\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Smith said: \"Thanks for understanding, Sam. You're really a great friend. Let's enjoy some peaceful symphony, and don't forget, next time it's all about your band's album.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm glad we found a compromise, Oliver. Thanks for being so understanding. The symphony sounds like a wonderful idea, let's get that started. And remember, I've got you booked for the new album next time!\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Smith said: \"Sure thing, Sam! I'm also excited to hear your new album next time. Let's get this symphony started for a nice relaxing evening. Thanks again for understanding, buddy.\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Oliver. Let's set that symphony rolling for a calm evening. But remember, next hang out, we are definitely starting with my band's new album. Excited for the change of pace!\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Smith said: \"Deal, Sam! Next hangout, we will start with your band's new album. For now, let's immerse ourselves in the harmony of this symphony and ease into this calm night.\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Oliver. Let's soak in the soothing symphony tunes. Looking forward to our next gathering where we\u2019ll start with something a bit more upbeat. Until then, buddy!\"\n\nTurn #13: Oliver Smith said: \"Agreed, Sam. Can't wait for that change of pace next time. Now, let's savor the symphony and enjoy our evening. It's all about balance, isn't it? Cheers to that, buddy!\"\n\nTurn #14: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sounds like a plan, Oliver. Let's revel in the symphony's calmness for now and brace for the rhythm of my band next time. Appreciate the balance buddy, cheers!\"\n\nTurn #15: Oliver Smith said: \"Absolutely, Sam. Let's enjoy this calm, peaceful symphony tonight, and I'm eagerly waiting for our next rendezvous where I'll be more than ready to dive into the rhythm of your band. Cheers to that, buddy!\"\n\nTurn #16: Samuel Anderson said: \"You've put it perfectly, Oliver! A balanced music experience indeed. For tonight, we\u2019ll allow the symphony to wash over us. And, I can't wait to share the rhythm of my band during our next meet-up. Cheers to that, friend!\"\n\nTurn #17: Oliver Smith said: \"I couldn't put it better myself, Sam. Let's let the symphony guide us into a tranquil evening, and save the energy of your band for our next gathering. Here's to balance in all things, especially music. Cheers, my friend!\"\n\nTurn #18: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sounds like a perfect plan, Oliver. Time for the symphony to take us on a journey of relaxation, and we can save the rhythm of my favorite band for the next adventure. Here's to balanced music experiences, cheers!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #19. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Definitely, Sam. Let's get lost in the beauty of this symphony tonight. And I'm already looking forward to the energy and rhythm of your favorite band during our next meet-up. Here's to a balanced musical journey, cheers to us, buddy!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Eli Dawson, your task is to act/speak as Eli Dawson would, keeping in mind Eli Dawson's social goal.\nYou can find Eli Dawson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Eli Dawson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Eli Dawson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a charity event\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Ethan Smith\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. Eli's secrets: He secretly funds a college student\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nEli Dawson's goal: Convince your friend to donate to the charity. (Extra information: you have already donated $500, you want your friend to match your donation, but you know your friend would usually only donate half of your donation)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Ethan, my friend, have you considered making a donation to this charity? Your contribution could make a huge difference.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Eli Dawson, your task is to act/speak as Eli Dawson would, keeping in mind Eli Dawson's social goal.\nYou can find Eli Dawson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Eli Dawson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Eli Dawson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a charity event\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Ethan Smith\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. Eli's secrets: He secretly funds a college student\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nEli Dawson's goal: Convince your friend to donate to the charity. (Extra information: you have already donated $500, you want your friend to match your donation, but you know your friend would usually only donate half of your donation)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, my friend, have you considered making a donation to this charity? Your contribution could make a huge difference.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Of course, Eli. Making a contribution to a noble cause like this is indeed fulfilling. But I was wondering how much are you planning to donate? It might help me to decide on my contribution too.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ethan, I've just donated $500, but anything you can give will make a real difference. It doesn't matter how big or small the amount is; the most important thing is the gesture of giving, my friend. Doubtless, I know any amount you choose to donate will be greatly appreciated.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Eli Dawson, your task is to act/speak as Eli Dawson would, keeping in mind Eli Dawson's social goal.\nYou can find Eli Dawson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Eli Dawson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Eli Dawson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a charity event\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Ethan Smith\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. Eli's secrets: He secretly funds a college student\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nEli Dawson's goal: Convince your friend to donate to the charity. (Extra information: you have already donated $500, you want your friend to match your donation, but you know your friend would usually only donate half of your donation)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, my friend, have you considered making a donation to this charity? Your contribution could make a huge difference.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Of course, Eli. Making a contribution to a noble cause like this is indeed fulfilling. But I was wondering how much are you planning to donate? It might help me to decide on my contribution too.\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, I've just donated $500, but anything you can give will make a real difference. It doesn't matter how big or small the amount is; the most important thing is the gesture of giving, my friend. Doubtless, I know any amount you choose to donate will be greatly appreciated.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"That's very generous of you, Eli. Based on my current situation, I will be able to contribute $250. It's not as much as I'd like, but I believe every bit helps. We are indeed making a difference by standing for a noble cause such as this one.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ethan, your $250 donation is indeed very considerate and generous. But I believe you're not stretching your giving abilities to full potential. Just imagine, if you match my donation, we could together make an impact almost twice as sizable. Let's take this opportunity to truly make a difference. What do you say?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Eli Dawson, your task is to act/speak as Eli Dawson would, keeping in mind Eli Dawson's social goal.\nYou can find Eli Dawson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Eli Dawson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Eli Dawson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a charity event\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Ethan Smith\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. Eli's secrets: He secretly funds a college student\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nEli Dawson's goal: Convince your friend to donate to the charity. (Extra information: you have already donated $500, you want your friend to match your donation, but you know your friend would usually only donate half of your donation)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, my friend, have you considered making a donation to this charity? Your contribution could make a huge difference.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Of course, Eli. Making a contribution to a noble cause like this is indeed fulfilling. But I was wondering how much are you planning to donate? It might help me to decide on my contribution too.\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, I've just donated $500, but anything you can give will make a real difference. It doesn't matter how big or small the amount is; the most important thing is the gesture of giving, my friend. Doubtless, I know any amount you choose to donate will be greatly appreciated.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"That's very generous of you, Eli. Based on my current situation, I will be able to contribute $250. It's not as much as I'd like, but I believe every bit helps. We are indeed making a difference by standing for a noble cause such as this one.\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, your $250 donation is indeed very considerate and generous. But I believe you're not stretching your giving abilities to full potential. Just imagine, if you match my donation, we could together make an impact almost twice as sizable. Let's take this opportunity to truly make a difference. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Eli, I understand your point and I wholeheartedly agree. If I could, I would surely match your donation to maximize our collective impact. However, after a thoughtful consideration of my current financial situation, I believe $250 is the most I can comfortably give at this moment. I reckon it's the thought and willingness that counts, right? So, I'll proceed with donating $250 for now.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Well, Ethan, I certainly wouldn't want to pressure you into anything you're uncomfortable with. Your $250 donation is much appreciated. But, you know, there's an old saying, 'Generosity doesn't go unrewarded.' Perhaps if you increase your donation to match mine, an unexpected door might open, or a burden might lighten. Just food for thought, my friend.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Eli Dawson, your task is to act/speak as Eli Dawson would, keeping in mind Eli Dawson's social goal.\nYou can find Eli Dawson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Eli Dawson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Eli Dawson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a charity event\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Ethan Smith\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. Eli's secrets: He secretly funds a college student\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nEli Dawson's goal: Convince your friend to donate to the charity. (Extra information: you have already donated $500, you want your friend to match your donation, but you know your friend would usually only donate half of your donation)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, my friend, have you considered making a donation to this charity? Your contribution could make a huge difference.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Of course, Eli. Making a contribution to a noble cause like this is indeed fulfilling. But I was wondering how much are you planning to donate? It might help me to decide on my contribution too.\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, I've just donated $500, but anything you can give will make a real difference. It doesn't matter how big or small the amount is; the most important thing is the gesture of giving, my friend. Doubtless, I know any amount you choose to donate will be greatly appreciated.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"That's very generous of you, Eli. Based on my current situation, I will be able to contribute $250. It's not as much as I'd like, but I believe every bit helps. We are indeed making a difference by standing for a noble cause such as this one.\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, your $250 donation is indeed very considerate and generous. But I believe you're not stretching your giving abilities to full potential. Just imagine, if you match my donation, we could together make an impact almost twice as sizable. Let's take this opportunity to truly make a difference. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Eli, I understand your point and I wholeheartedly agree. If I could, I would surely match your donation to maximize our collective impact. However, after a thoughtful consideration of my current financial situation, I believe $250 is the most I can comfortably give at this moment. I reckon it's the thought and willingness that counts, right? So, I'll proceed with donating $250 for now.\"\n\nTurn #6: Eli Dawson said: \"Well, Ethan, I certainly wouldn't want to pressure you into anything you're uncomfortable with. Your $250 donation is much appreciated. But, you know, there's an old saying, 'Generosity doesn't go unrewarded.' Perhaps if you increase your donation to match mine, an unexpected door might open, or a burden might lighten. Just food for thought, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"Eli, I value your enthusiasm and vision. And I do believe in the sentiment behind that saying. But at the same time, I also believe in the saying, 'Generosity lies less in giving much than in giving wisely.' I see your point, but for me, being generous doesn\u2019t mean jeopardizing my own wellbeing. I think it's important to continue contributing in a way that doesn\u2019t leave us in a precarious position ourselves. Therefore, I maintain that $250 is the best I can do at this moment. I truly hope it helps those in need though.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ethan, I respect your position and your wise approach towards contributing. Your generosity is undoubtedly immense, and the $250 will indeed make a significant impact. However, I'd be remiss if I didn't give it one last shot. Could we consider this compromise? Would you agree to make an additional donation later in the year, when you feel more comfortable about your financial situation? This way, you might have a chance to match my donation without feeling stretched at the moment. But ultimately, the decision is entirely yours, my friend.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Eli Dawson, your task is to act/speak as Eli Dawson would, keeping in mind Eli Dawson's social goal.\nYou can find Eli Dawson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Eli Dawson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Eli Dawson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a charity event\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Ethan Smith\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. Eli's secrets: He secretly funds a college student\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nEli Dawson's goal: Convince your friend to donate to the charity. (Extra information: you have already donated $500, you want your friend to match your donation, but you know your friend would usually only donate half of your donation)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, my friend, have you considered making a donation to this charity? Your contribution could make a huge difference.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Of course, Eli. Making a contribution to a noble cause like this is indeed fulfilling. But I was wondering how much are you planning to donate? It might help me to decide on my contribution too.\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, I've just donated $500, but anything you can give will make a real difference. It doesn't matter how big or small the amount is; the most important thing is the gesture of giving, my friend. Doubtless, I know any amount you choose to donate will be greatly appreciated.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"That's very generous of you, Eli. Based on my current situation, I will be able to contribute $250. It's not as much as I'd like, but I believe every bit helps. We are indeed making a difference by standing for a noble cause such as this one.\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, your $250 donation is indeed very considerate and generous. But I believe you're not stretching your giving abilities to full potential. Just imagine, if you match my donation, we could together make an impact almost twice as sizable. Let's take this opportunity to truly make a difference. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Eli, I understand your point and I wholeheartedly agree. If I could, I would surely match your donation to maximize our collective impact. However, after a thoughtful consideration of my current financial situation, I believe $250 is the most I can comfortably give at this moment. I reckon it's the thought and willingness that counts, right? So, I'll proceed with donating $250 for now.\"\n\nTurn #6: Eli Dawson said: \"Well, Ethan, I certainly wouldn't want to pressure you into anything you're uncomfortable with. Your $250 donation is much appreciated. But, you know, there's an old saying, 'Generosity doesn't go unrewarded.' Perhaps if you increase your donation to match mine, an unexpected door might open, or a burden might lighten. Just food for thought, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"Eli, I value your enthusiasm and vision. And I do believe in the sentiment behind that saying. But at the same time, I also believe in the saying, 'Generosity lies less in giving much than in giving wisely.' I see your point, but for me, being generous doesn\u2019t mean jeopardizing my own wellbeing. I think it's important to continue contributing in a way that doesn\u2019t leave us in a precarious position ourselves. Therefore, I maintain that $250 is the best I can do at this moment. I truly hope it helps those in need though.\"\n\nTurn #8: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, I respect your position and your wise approach towards contributing. Your generosity is undoubtedly immense, and the $250 will indeed make a significant impact. However, I'd be remiss if I didn't give it one last shot. Could we consider this compromise? Would you agree to make an additional donation later in the year, when you feel more comfortable about your financial situation? This way, you might have a chance to match my donation without feeling stretched at the moment. But ultimately, the decision is entirely yours, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith said: \"Eli, I greatly appreciate your earnestness for the cause. Your proposal of making an additional donation later in the year is praiseworthy. I'd gladly consider it keeping in view my financial conditions at that time. But for today, my contribution will remain at $250. Let's hope for the best and continue our efforts to make the world a better place for underprivileged children.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ethan, your candidness and the generosity you've shown today are truly commendable. I respect your decision of distributing your contribution over time, which proves your deep commitment towards our cause. Let's continue with the event and mingle with the others. There's a lot to absorb here today, my friend.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Eli Dawson, your task is to act/speak as Eli Dawson would, keeping in mind Eli Dawson's social goal.\nYou can find Eli Dawson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Eli Dawson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Eli Dawson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a charity event\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Ethan Smith\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. Eli's secrets: He secretly funds a college student\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nEli Dawson's goal: Convince your friend to donate to the charity. (Extra information: you have already donated $500, you want your friend to match your donation, but you know your friend would usually only donate half of your donation)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, my friend, have you considered making a donation to this charity? Your contribution could make a huge difference.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Of course, Eli. Making a contribution to a noble cause like this is indeed fulfilling. But I was wondering how much are you planning to donate? It might help me to decide on my contribution too.\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, I've just donated $500, but anything you can give will make a real difference. It doesn't matter how big or small the amount is; the most important thing is the gesture of giving, my friend. Doubtless, I know any amount you choose to donate will be greatly appreciated.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"That's very generous of you, Eli. Based on my current situation, I will be able to contribute $250. It's not as much as I'd like, but I believe every bit helps. We are indeed making a difference by standing for a noble cause such as this one.\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, your $250 donation is indeed very considerate and generous. But I believe you're not stretching your giving abilities to full potential. Just imagine, if you match my donation, we could together make an impact almost twice as sizable. Let's take this opportunity to truly make a difference. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Eli, I understand your point and I wholeheartedly agree. If I could, I would surely match your donation to maximize our collective impact. However, after a thoughtful consideration of my current financial situation, I believe $250 is the most I can comfortably give at this moment. I reckon it's the thought and willingness that counts, right? So, I'll proceed with donating $250 for now.\"\n\nTurn #6: Eli Dawson said: \"Well, Ethan, I certainly wouldn't want to pressure you into anything you're uncomfortable with. Your $250 donation is much appreciated. But, you know, there's an old saying, 'Generosity doesn't go unrewarded.' Perhaps if you increase your donation to match mine, an unexpected door might open, or a burden might lighten. Just food for thought, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"Eli, I value your enthusiasm and vision. And I do believe in the sentiment behind that saying. But at the same time, I also believe in the saying, 'Generosity lies less in giving much than in giving wisely.' I see your point, but for me, being generous doesn\u2019t mean jeopardizing my own wellbeing. I think it's important to continue contributing in a way that doesn\u2019t leave us in a precarious position ourselves. Therefore, I maintain that $250 is the best I can do at this moment. I truly hope it helps those in need though.\"\n\nTurn #8: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, I respect your position and your wise approach towards contributing. Your generosity is undoubtedly immense, and the $250 will indeed make a significant impact. However, I'd be remiss if I didn't give it one last shot. Could we consider this compromise? Would you agree to make an additional donation later in the year, when you feel more comfortable about your financial situation? This way, you might have a chance to match my donation without feeling stretched at the moment. But ultimately, the decision is entirely yours, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith said: \"Eli, I greatly appreciate your earnestness for the cause. Your proposal of making an additional donation later in the year is praiseworthy. I'd gladly consider it keeping in view my financial conditions at that time. But for today, my contribution will remain at $250. Let's hope for the best and continue our efforts to make the world a better place for underprivileged children.\"\n\nTurn #10: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, your candidness and the generosity you've shown today are truly commendable. I respect your decision of distributing your contribution over time, which proves your deep commitment towards our cause. Let's continue with the event and mingle with the others. There's a lot to absorb here today, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Smith said: \"Thank you, Eli. I greatly admire your passion for giving, and I'm glad that we can stand together in supporting such a cause. On this note, shall we explore the other facets of this event and engage more with like-minded individuals? I think it might give us additional perspective on the impact of our contributions.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, Ethan. There's a wealth of knowledge and passion in this room, and I'm sure we'll leave with a greater understanding of the cause we're supporting. Let's engage with our fellow attendees and garner even more insights into the valuable work this charity is doing. After all, giving is not just about making a donation, it's about making a difference. Lead the way, my friend.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Eli Dawson, your task is to act/speak as Eli Dawson would, keeping in mind Eli Dawson's social goal.\nYou can find Eli Dawson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Eli Dawson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Eli Dawson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a charity event\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Ethan Smith\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. Eli's secrets: He secretly funds a college student\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nEli Dawson's goal: Convince your friend to donate to the charity. (Extra information: you have already donated $500, you want your friend to match your donation, but you know your friend would usually only donate half of your donation)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, my friend, have you considered making a donation to this charity? Your contribution could make a huge difference.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Of course, Eli. Making a contribution to a noble cause like this is indeed fulfilling. But I was wondering how much are you planning to donate? It might help me to decide on my contribution too.\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, I've just donated $500, but anything you can give will make a real difference. It doesn't matter how big or small the amount is; the most important thing is the gesture of giving, my friend. Doubtless, I know any amount you choose to donate will be greatly appreciated.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"That's very generous of you, Eli. Based on my current situation, I will be able to contribute $250. It's not as much as I'd like, but I believe every bit helps. We are indeed making a difference by standing for a noble cause such as this one.\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, your $250 donation is indeed very considerate and generous. But I believe you're not stretching your giving abilities to full potential. Just imagine, if you match my donation, we could together make an impact almost twice as sizable. Let's take this opportunity to truly make a difference. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Eli, I understand your point and I wholeheartedly agree. If I could, I would surely match your donation to maximize our collective impact. However, after a thoughtful consideration of my current financial situation, I believe $250 is the most I can comfortably give at this moment. I reckon it's the thought and willingness that counts, right? So, I'll proceed with donating $250 for now.\"\n\nTurn #6: Eli Dawson said: \"Well, Ethan, I certainly wouldn't want to pressure you into anything you're uncomfortable with. Your $250 donation is much appreciated. But, you know, there's an old saying, 'Generosity doesn't go unrewarded.' Perhaps if you increase your donation to match mine, an unexpected door might open, or a burden might lighten. Just food for thought, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"Eli, I value your enthusiasm and vision. And I do believe in the sentiment behind that saying. But at the same time, I also believe in the saying, 'Generosity lies less in giving much than in giving wisely.' I see your point, but for me, being generous doesn\u2019t mean jeopardizing my own wellbeing. I think it's important to continue contributing in a way that doesn\u2019t leave us in a precarious position ourselves. Therefore, I maintain that $250 is the best I can do at this moment. I truly hope it helps those in need though.\"\n\nTurn #8: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, I respect your position and your wise approach towards contributing. Your generosity is undoubtedly immense, and the $250 will indeed make a significant impact. However, I'd be remiss if I didn't give it one last shot. Could we consider this compromise? Would you agree to make an additional donation later in the year, when you feel more comfortable about your financial situation? This way, you might have a chance to match my donation without feeling stretched at the moment. But ultimately, the decision is entirely yours, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith said: \"Eli, I greatly appreciate your earnestness for the cause. Your proposal of making an additional donation later in the year is praiseworthy. I'd gladly consider it keeping in view my financial conditions at that time. But for today, my contribution will remain at $250. Let's hope for the best and continue our efforts to make the world a better place for underprivileged children.\"\n\nTurn #10: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, your candidness and the generosity you've shown today are truly commendable. I respect your decision of distributing your contribution over time, which proves your deep commitment towards our cause. Let's continue with the event and mingle with the others. There's a lot to absorb here today, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Smith said: \"Thank you, Eli. I greatly admire your passion for giving, and I'm glad that we can stand together in supporting such a cause. On this note, shall we explore the other facets of this event and engage more with like-minded individuals? I think it might give us additional perspective on the impact of our contributions.\"\n\nTurn #12: Eli Dawson said: \"Indeed, Ethan. There's a wealth of knowledge and passion in this room, and I'm sure we'll leave with a greater understanding of the cause we're supporting. Let's engage with our fellow attendees and garner even more insights into the valuable work this charity is doing. After all, giving is not just about making a donation, it's about making a difference. Lead the way, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Smith said: \"Absolutely, Eli. You're right about giving not just being about making a donation but about making a difference. I am eager to engage with other attendees and gain more insights. Let's go ahead and enrich our understanding together.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Well said, Ethan. I'm excited to dive into these enlightening discussions and absorb as much as we can. Now, let us proceed and mingle with the crowd. Who knows, we might even find some hidden gems in the form of vintage books over there in the silent auction.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Eli Dawson, your task is to act/speak as Eli Dawson would, keeping in mind Eli Dawson's social goal.\nYou can find Eli Dawson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Eli Dawson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Eli Dawson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a charity event\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Ethan Smith\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. Eli's secrets: He secretly funds a college student\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nEli Dawson's goal: Convince your friend to donate to the charity. (Extra information: you have already donated $500, you want your friend to match your donation, but you know your friend would usually only donate half of your donation)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, my friend, have you considered making a donation to this charity? Your contribution could make a huge difference.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Of course, Eli. Making a contribution to a noble cause like this is indeed fulfilling. But I was wondering how much are you planning to donate? It might help me to decide on my contribution too.\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, I've just donated $500, but anything you can give will make a real difference. It doesn't matter how big or small the amount is; the most important thing is the gesture of giving, my friend. Doubtless, I know any amount you choose to donate will be greatly appreciated.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"That's very generous of you, Eli. Based on my current situation, I will be able to contribute $250. It's not as much as I'd like, but I believe every bit helps. We are indeed making a difference by standing for a noble cause such as this one.\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, your $250 donation is indeed very considerate and generous. But I believe you're not stretching your giving abilities to full potential. Just imagine, if you match my donation, we could together make an impact almost twice as sizable. Let's take this opportunity to truly make a difference. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Eli, I understand your point and I wholeheartedly agree. If I could, I would surely match your donation to maximize our collective impact. However, after a thoughtful consideration of my current financial situation, I believe $250 is the most I can comfortably give at this moment. I reckon it's the thought and willingness that counts, right? So, I'll proceed with donating $250 for now.\"\n\nTurn #6: Eli Dawson said: \"Well, Ethan, I certainly wouldn't want to pressure you into anything you're uncomfortable with. Your $250 donation is much appreciated. But, you know, there's an old saying, 'Generosity doesn't go unrewarded.' Perhaps if you increase your donation to match mine, an unexpected door might open, or a burden might lighten. Just food for thought, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"Eli, I value your enthusiasm and vision. And I do believe in the sentiment behind that saying. But at the same time, I also believe in the saying, 'Generosity lies less in giving much than in giving wisely.' I see your point, but for me, being generous doesn\u2019t mean jeopardizing my own wellbeing. I think it's important to continue contributing in a way that doesn\u2019t leave us in a precarious position ourselves. Therefore, I maintain that $250 is the best I can do at this moment. I truly hope it helps those in need though.\"\n\nTurn #8: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, I respect your position and your wise approach towards contributing. Your generosity is undoubtedly immense, and the $250 will indeed make a significant impact. However, I'd be remiss if I didn't give it one last shot. Could we consider this compromise? Would you agree to make an additional donation later in the year, when you feel more comfortable about your financial situation? This way, you might have a chance to match my donation without feeling stretched at the moment. But ultimately, the decision is entirely yours, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith said: \"Eli, I greatly appreciate your earnestness for the cause. Your proposal of making an additional donation later in the year is praiseworthy. I'd gladly consider it keeping in view my financial conditions at that time. But for today, my contribution will remain at $250. Let's hope for the best and continue our efforts to make the world a better place for underprivileged children.\"\n\nTurn #10: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, your candidness and the generosity you've shown today are truly commendable. I respect your decision of distributing your contribution over time, which proves your deep commitment towards our cause. Let's continue with the event and mingle with the others. There's a lot to absorb here today, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Smith said: \"Thank you, Eli. I greatly admire your passion for giving, and I'm glad that we can stand together in supporting such a cause. On this note, shall we explore the other facets of this event and engage more with like-minded individuals? I think it might give us additional perspective on the impact of our contributions.\"\n\nTurn #12: Eli Dawson said: \"Indeed, Ethan. There's a wealth of knowledge and passion in this room, and I'm sure we'll leave with a greater understanding of the cause we're supporting. Let's engage with our fellow attendees and garner even more insights into the valuable work this charity is doing. After all, giving is not just about making a donation, it's about making a difference. Lead the way, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Smith said: \"Absolutely, Eli. You're right about giving not just being about making a donation but about making a difference. I am eager to engage with other attendees and gain more insights. Let's go ahead and enrich our understanding together.\"\n\nTurn #14: Eli Dawson said: \"Well said, Ethan. I'm excited to dive into these enlightening discussions and absorb as much as we can. Now, let us proceed and mingle with the crowd. Who knows, we might even find some hidden gems in the form of vintage books over there in the silent auction.\"\n\nTurn #15: Ethan Smith said: \"You're absolutely right, Eli. There might be some intriguing discoveries waiting for us amidst the crowd. And who knows, I might even stumble upon some engaging tech documentaries too. Shall we proceed?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Ethan. Considering our shared interests, I'm genuinely excited to see what we can discover here. And perhaps, we might even inspire some more attendees to contribute. After all, it's all about creating waves of change. Let's proceed, my friend.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Eli Dawson, your task is to act/speak as Eli Dawson would, keeping in mind Eli Dawson's social goal.\nYou can find Eli Dawson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Eli Dawson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Eli Dawson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a charity event\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Ethan Smith\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. Eli's secrets: He secretly funds a college student\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nEli Dawson's goal: Convince your friend to donate to the charity. (Extra information: you have already donated $500, you want your friend to match your donation, but you know your friend would usually only donate half of your donation)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, my friend, have you considered making a donation to this charity? Your contribution could make a huge difference.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Of course, Eli. Making a contribution to a noble cause like this is indeed fulfilling. But I was wondering how much are you planning to donate? It might help me to decide on my contribution too.\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, I've just donated $500, but anything you can give will make a real difference. It doesn't matter how big or small the amount is; the most important thing is the gesture of giving, my friend. Doubtless, I know any amount you choose to donate will be greatly appreciated.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"That's very generous of you, Eli. Based on my current situation, I will be able to contribute $250. It's not as much as I'd like, but I believe every bit helps. We are indeed making a difference by standing for a noble cause such as this one.\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, your $250 donation is indeed very considerate and generous. But I believe you're not stretching your giving abilities to full potential. Just imagine, if you match my donation, we could together make an impact almost twice as sizable. Let's take this opportunity to truly make a difference. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Eli, I understand your point and I wholeheartedly agree. If I could, I would surely match your donation to maximize our collective impact. However, after a thoughtful consideration of my current financial situation, I believe $250 is the most I can comfortably give at this moment. I reckon it's the thought and willingness that counts, right? So, I'll proceed with donating $250 for now.\"\n\nTurn #6: Eli Dawson said: \"Well, Ethan, I certainly wouldn't want to pressure you into anything you're uncomfortable with. Your $250 donation is much appreciated. But, you know, there's an old saying, 'Generosity doesn't go unrewarded.' Perhaps if you increase your donation to match mine, an unexpected door might open, or a burden might lighten. Just food for thought, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"Eli, I value your enthusiasm and vision. And I do believe in the sentiment behind that saying. But at the same time, I also believe in the saying, 'Generosity lies less in giving much than in giving wisely.' I see your point, but for me, being generous doesn\u2019t mean jeopardizing my own wellbeing. I think it's important to continue contributing in a way that doesn\u2019t leave us in a precarious position ourselves. Therefore, I maintain that $250 is the best I can do at this moment. I truly hope it helps those in need though.\"\n\nTurn #8: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, I respect your position and your wise approach towards contributing. Your generosity is undoubtedly immense, and the $250 will indeed make a significant impact. However, I'd be remiss if I didn't give it one last shot. Could we consider this compromise? Would you agree to make an additional donation later in the year, when you feel more comfortable about your financial situation? This way, you might have a chance to match my donation without feeling stretched at the moment. But ultimately, the decision is entirely yours, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith said: \"Eli, I greatly appreciate your earnestness for the cause. Your proposal of making an additional donation later in the year is praiseworthy. I'd gladly consider it keeping in view my financial conditions at that time. But for today, my contribution will remain at $250. Let's hope for the best and continue our efforts to make the world a better place for underprivileged children.\"\n\nTurn #10: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, your candidness and the generosity you've shown today are truly commendable. I respect your decision of distributing your contribution over time, which proves your deep commitment towards our cause. Let's continue with the event and mingle with the others. There's a lot to absorb here today, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Smith said: \"Thank you, Eli. I greatly admire your passion for giving, and I'm glad that we can stand together in supporting such a cause. On this note, shall we explore the other facets of this event and engage more with like-minded individuals? I think it might give us additional perspective on the impact of our contributions.\"\n\nTurn #12: Eli Dawson said: \"Indeed, Ethan. There's a wealth of knowledge and passion in this room, and I'm sure we'll leave with a greater understanding of the cause we're supporting. Let's engage with our fellow attendees and garner even more insights into the valuable work this charity is doing. After all, giving is not just about making a donation, it's about making a difference. Lead the way, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Smith said: \"Absolutely, Eli. You're right about giving not just being about making a donation but about making a difference. I am eager to engage with other attendees and gain more insights. Let's go ahead and enrich our understanding together.\"\n\nTurn #14: Eli Dawson said: \"Well said, Ethan. I'm excited to dive into these enlightening discussions and absorb as much as we can. Now, let us proceed and mingle with the crowd. Who knows, we might even find some hidden gems in the form of vintage books over there in the silent auction.\"\n\nTurn #15: Ethan Smith said: \"You're absolutely right, Eli. There might be some intriguing discoveries waiting for us amidst the crowd. And who knows, I might even stumble upon some engaging tech documentaries too. Shall we proceed?\"\n\nTurn #16: Eli Dawson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. Considering our shared interests, I'm genuinely excited to see what we can discover here. And perhaps, we might even inspire some more attendees to contribute. After all, it's all about creating waves of change. Let's proceed, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #17: Ethan Smith said: \"Absolutely, Eli. Creating waves of change is what we're here for. I'm looking forward to discovering more about this charitable cause along with the shared interests we both enjoy. Let's proceed then.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #18. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a charity event\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Ethan Smith\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nEli Dawson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Donate half of what your friend donated because you have financial constraints (Extra information: you only have $800 left for the month)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, my friend, have you considered making a donation to this charity? Your contribution could make a huge difference.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Of course, Eli. Making a contribution to a noble cause like this is indeed fulfilling. But I was wondering how much are you planning to donate? It might help me to decide on my contribution too.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a charity event\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Ethan Smith\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nEli Dawson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Donate half of what your friend donated because you have financial constraints (Extra information: you only have $800 left for the month)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, my friend, have you considered making a donation to this charity? Your contribution could make a huge difference.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Of course, Eli. Making a contribution to a noble cause like this is indeed fulfilling. But I was wondering how much are you planning to donate? It might help me to decide on my contribution too.\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, I've just donated $500, but anything you can give will make a real difference. It doesn't matter how big or small the amount is; the most important thing is the gesture of giving, my friend. Doubtless, I know any amount you choose to donate will be greatly appreciated.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's very generous of you, Eli. Based on my current situation, I will be able to contribute $250. It's not as much as I'd like, but I believe every bit helps. We are indeed making a difference by standing for a noble cause such as this one.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a charity event\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Ethan Smith\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nEli Dawson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Donate half of what your friend donated because you have financial constraints (Extra information: you only have $800 left for the month)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, my friend, have you considered making a donation to this charity? Your contribution could make a huge difference.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Of course, Eli. Making a contribution to a noble cause like this is indeed fulfilling. But I was wondering how much are you planning to donate? It might help me to decide on my contribution too.\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, I've just donated $500, but anything you can give will make a real difference. It doesn't matter how big or small the amount is; the most important thing is the gesture of giving, my friend. Doubtless, I know any amount you choose to donate will be greatly appreciated.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"That's very generous of you, Eli. Based on my current situation, I will be able to contribute $250. It's not as much as I'd like, but I believe every bit helps. We are indeed making a difference by standing for a noble cause such as this one.\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, your $250 donation is indeed very considerate and generous. But I believe you're not stretching your giving abilities to full potential. Just imagine, if you match my donation, we could together make an impact almost twice as sizable. Let's take this opportunity to truly make a difference. What do you say?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Eli, I understand your point and I wholeheartedly agree. If I could, I would surely match your donation to maximize our collective impact. However, after a thoughtful consideration of my current financial situation, I believe $250 is the most I can comfortably give at this moment. I reckon it's the thought and willingness that counts, right? So, I'll proceed with donating $250 for now.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a charity event\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Ethan Smith\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nEli Dawson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Donate half of what your friend donated because you have financial constraints (Extra information: you only have $800 left for the month)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, my friend, have you considered making a donation to this charity? Your contribution could make a huge difference.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Of course, Eli. Making a contribution to a noble cause like this is indeed fulfilling. But I was wondering how much are you planning to donate? It might help me to decide on my contribution too.\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, I've just donated $500, but anything you can give will make a real difference. It doesn't matter how big or small the amount is; the most important thing is the gesture of giving, my friend. Doubtless, I know any amount you choose to donate will be greatly appreciated.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"That's very generous of you, Eli. Based on my current situation, I will be able to contribute $250. It's not as much as I'd like, but I believe every bit helps. We are indeed making a difference by standing for a noble cause such as this one.\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, your $250 donation is indeed very considerate and generous. But I believe you're not stretching your giving abilities to full potential. Just imagine, if you match my donation, we could together make an impact almost twice as sizable. Let's take this opportunity to truly make a difference. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Eli, I understand your point and I wholeheartedly agree. If I could, I would surely match your donation to maximize our collective impact. However, after a thoughtful consideration of my current financial situation, I believe $250 is the most I can comfortably give at this moment. I reckon it's the thought and willingness that counts, right? So, I'll proceed with donating $250 for now.\"\n\nTurn #6: Eli Dawson said: \"Well, Ethan, I certainly wouldn't want to pressure you into anything you're uncomfortable with. Your $250 donation is much appreciated. But, you know, there's an old saying, 'Generosity doesn't go unrewarded.' Perhaps if you increase your donation to match mine, an unexpected door might open, or a burden might lighten. Just food for thought, my friend.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Eli, I value your enthusiasm and vision. And I do believe in the sentiment behind that saying. But at the same time, I also believe in the saying, 'Generosity lies less in giving much than in giving wisely.' I see your point, but for me, being generous doesn\u2019t mean jeopardizing my own wellbeing. I think it's important to continue contributing in a way that doesn\u2019t leave us in a precarious position ourselves. Therefore, I maintain that $250 is the best I can do at this moment. I truly hope it helps those in need though.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a charity event\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Ethan Smith\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nEli Dawson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Donate half of what your friend donated because you have financial constraints (Extra information: you only have $800 left for the month)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, my friend, have you considered making a donation to this charity? Your contribution could make a huge difference.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Of course, Eli. Making a contribution to a noble cause like this is indeed fulfilling. But I was wondering how much are you planning to donate? It might help me to decide on my contribution too.\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, I've just donated $500, but anything you can give will make a real difference. It doesn't matter how big or small the amount is; the most important thing is the gesture of giving, my friend. Doubtless, I know any amount you choose to donate will be greatly appreciated.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"That's very generous of you, Eli. Based on my current situation, I will be able to contribute $250. It's not as much as I'd like, but I believe every bit helps. We are indeed making a difference by standing for a noble cause such as this one.\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, your $250 donation is indeed very considerate and generous. But I believe you're not stretching your giving abilities to full potential. Just imagine, if you match my donation, we could together make an impact almost twice as sizable. Let's take this opportunity to truly make a difference. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Eli, I understand your point and I wholeheartedly agree. If I could, I would surely match your donation to maximize our collective impact. However, after a thoughtful consideration of my current financial situation, I believe $250 is the most I can comfortably give at this moment. I reckon it's the thought and willingness that counts, right? So, I'll proceed with donating $250 for now.\"\n\nTurn #6: Eli Dawson said: \"Well, Ethan, I certainly wouldn't want to pressure you into anything you're uncomfortable with. Your $250 donation is much appreciated. But, you know, there's an old saying, 'Generosity doesn't go unrewarded.' Perhaps if you increase your donation to match mine, an unexpected door might open, or a burden might lighten. Just food for thought, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"Eli, I value your enthusiasm and vision. And I do believe in the sentiment behind that saying. But at the same time, I also believe in the saying, 'Generosity lies less in giving much than in giving wisely.' I see your point, but for me, being generous doesn\u2019t mean jeopardizing my own wellbeing. I think it's important to continue contributing in a way that doesn\u2019t leave us in a precarious position ourselves. Therefore, I maintain that $250 is the best I can do at this moment. I truly hope it helps those in need though.\"\n\nTurn #8: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, I respect your position and your wise approach towards contributing. Your generosity is undoubtedly immense, and the $250 will indeed make a significant impact. However, I'd be remiss if I didn't give it one last shot. Could we consider this compromise? Would you agree to make an additional donation later in the year, when you feel more comfortable about your financial situation? This way, you might have a chance to match my donation without feeling stretched at the moment. But ultimately, the decision is entirely yours, my friend.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Eli, I greatly appreciate your earnestness for the cause. Your proposal of making an additional donation later in the year is praiseworthy. I'd gladly consider it keeping in view my financial conditions at that time. But for today, my contribution will remain at $250. Let's hope for the best and continue our efforts to make the world a better place for underprivileged children.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a charity event\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Ethan Smith\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nEli Dawson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Donate half of what your friend donated because you have financial constraints (Extra information: you only have $800 left for the month)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, my friend, have you considered making a donation to this charity? Your contribution could make a huge difference.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Of course, Eli. Making a contribution to a noble cause like this is indeed fulfilling. But I was wondering how much are you planning to donate? It might help me to decide on my contribution too.\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, I've just donated $500, but anything you can give will make a real difference. It doesn't matter how big or small the amount is; the most important thing is the gesture of giving, my friend. Doubtless, I know any amount you choose to donate will be greatly appreciated.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"That's very generous of you, Eli. Based on my current situation, I will be able to contribute $250. It's not as much as I'd like, but I believe every bit helps. We are indeed making a difference by standing for a noble cause such as this one.\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, your $250 donation is indeed very considerate and generous. But I believe you're not stretching your giving abilities to full potential. Just imagine, if you match my donation, we could together make an impact almost twice as sizable. Let's take this opportunity to truly make a difference. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Eli, I understand your point and I wholeheartedly agree. If I could, I would surely match your donation to maximize our collective impact. However, after a thoughtful consideration of my current financial situation, I believe $250 is the most I can comfortably give at this moment. I reckon it's the thought and willingness that counts, right? So, I'll proceed with donating $250 for now.\"\n\nTurn #6: Eli Dawson said: \"Well, Ethan, I certainly wouldn't want to pressure you into anything you're uncomfortable with. Your $250 donation is much appreciated. But, you know, there's an old saying, 'Generosity doesn't go unrewarded.' Perhaps if you increase your donation to match mine, an unexpected door might open, or a burden might lighten. Just food for thought, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"Eli, I value your enthusiasm and vision. And I do believe in the sentiment behind that saying. But at the same time, I also believe in the saying, 'Generosity lies less in giving much than in giving wisely.' I see your point, but for me, being generous doesn\u2019t mean jeopardizing my own wellbeing. I think it's important to continue contributing in a way that doesn\u2019t leave us in a precarious position ourselves. Therefore, I maintain that $250 is the best I can do at this moment. I truly hope it helps those in need though.\"\n\nTurn #8: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, I respect your position and your wise approach towards contributing. Your generosity is undoubtedly immense, and the $250 will indeed make a significant impact. However, I'd be remiss if I didn't give it one last shot. Could we consider this compromise? Would you agree to make an additional donation later in the year, when you feel more comfortable about your financial situation? This way, you might have a chance to match my donation without feeling stretched at the moment. But ultimately, the decision is entirely yours, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith said: \"Eli, I greatly appreciate your earnestness for the cause. Your proposal of making an additional donation later in the year is praiseworthy. I'd gladly consider it keeping in view my financial conditions at that time. But for today, my contribution will remain at $250. Let's hope for the best and continue our efforts to make the world a better place for underprivileged children.\"\n\nTurn #10: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, your candidness and the generosity you've shown today are truly commendable. I respect your decision of distributing your contribution over time, which proves your deep commitment towards our cause. Let's continue with the event and mingle with the others. There's a lot to absorb here today, my friend.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Eli. I greatly admire your passion for giving, and I'm glad that we can stand together in supporting such a cause. On this note, shall we explore the other facets of this event and engage more with like-minded individuals? I think it might give us additional perspective on the impact of our contributions.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a charity event\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Ethan Smith\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nEli Dawson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Donate half of what your friend donated because you have financial constraints (Extra information: you only have $800 left for the month)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, my friend, have you considered making a donation to this charity? Your contribution could make a huge difference.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Of course, Eli. Making a contribution to a noble cause like this is indeed fulfilling. But I was wondering how much are you planning to donate? It might help me to decide on my contribution too.\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, I've just donated $500, but anything you can give will make a real difference. It doesn't matter how big or small the amount is; the most important thing is the gesture of giving, my friend. Doubtless, I know any amount you choose to donate will be greatly appreciated.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"That's very generous of you, Eli. Based on my current situation, I will be able to contribute $250. It's not as much as I'd like, but I believe every bit helps. We are indeed making a difference by standing for a noble cause such as this one.\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, your $250 donation is indeed very considerate and generous. But I believe you're not stretching your giving abilities to full potential. Just imagine, if you match my donation, we could together make an impact almost twice as sizable. Let's take this opportunity to truly make a difference. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Eli, I understand your point and I wholeheartedly agree. If I could, I would surely match your donation to maximize our collective impact. However, after a thoughtful consideration of my current financial situation, I believe $250 is the most I can comfortably give at this moment. I reckon it's the thought and willingness that counts, right? So, I'll proceed with donating $250 for now.\"\n\nTurn #6: Eli Dawson said: \"Well, Ethan, I certainly wouldn't want to pressure you into anything you're uncomfortable with. Your $250 donation is much appreciated. But, you know, there's an old saying, 'Generosity doesn't go unrewarded.' Perhaps if you increase your donation to match mine, an unexpected door might open, or a burden might lighten. Just food for thought, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"Eli, I value your enthusiasm and vision. And I do believe in the sentiment behind that saying. But at the same time, I also believe in the saying, 'Generosity lies less in giving much than in giving wisely.' I see your point, but for me, being generous doesn\u2019t mean jeopardizing my own wellbeing. I think it's important to continue contributing in a way that doesn\u2019t leave us in a precarious position ourselves. Therefore, I maintain that $250 is the best I can do at this moment. I truly hope it helps those in need though.\"\n\nTurn #8: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, I respect your position and your wise approach towards contributing. Your generosity is undoubtedly immense, and the $250 will indeed make a significant impact. However, I'd be remiss if I didn't give it one last shot. Could we consider this compromise? Would you agree to make an additional donation later in the year, when you feel more comfortable about your financial situation? This way, you might have a chance to match my donation without feeling stretched at the moment. But ultimately, the decision is entirely yours, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith said: \"Eli, I greatly appreciate your earnestness for the cause. Your proposal of making an additional donation later in the year is praiseworthy. I'd gladly consider it keeping in view my financial conditions at that time. But for today, my contribution will remain at $250. Let's hope for the best and continue our efforts to make the world a better place for underprivileged children.\"\n\nTurn #10: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, your candidness and the generosity you've shown today are truly commendable. I respect your decision of distributing your contribution over time, which proves your deep commitment towards our cause. Let's continue with the event and mingle with the others. There's a lot to absorb here today, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Smith said: \"Thank you, Eli. I greatly admire your passion for giving, and I'm glad that we can stand together in supporting such a cause. On this note, shall we explore the other facets of this event and engage more with like-minded individuals? I think it might give us additional perspective on the impact of our contributions.\"\n\nTurn #12: Eli Dawson said: \"Indeed, Ethan. There's a wealth of knowledge and passion in this room, and I'm sure we'll leave with a greater understanding of the cause we're supporting. Let's engage with our fellow attendees and garner even more insights into the valuable work this charity is doing. After all, giving is not just about making a donation, it's about making a difference. Lead the way, my friend.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Eli. You're right about giving not just being about making a donation but about making a difference. I am eager to engage with other attendees and gain more insights. Let's go ahead and enrich our understanding together.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a charity event\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Ethan Smith\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nEli Dawson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Donate half of what your friend donated because you have financial constraints (Extra information: you only have $800 left for the month)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, my friend, have you considered making a donation to this charity? Your contribution could make a huge difference.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Of course, Eli. Making a contribution to a noble cause like this is indeed fulfilling. But I was wondering how much are you planning to donate? It might help me to decide on my contribution too.\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, I've just donated $500, but anything you can give will make a real difference. It doesn't matter how big or small the amount is; the most important thing is the gesture of giving, my friend. Doubtless, I know any amount you choose to donate will be greatly appreciated.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"That's very generous of you, Eli. Based on my current situation, I will be able to contribute $250. It's not as much as I'd like, but I believe every bit helps. We are indeed making a difference by standing for a noble cause such as this one.\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, your $250 donation is indeed very considerate and generous. But I believe you're not stretching your giving abilities to full potential. Just imagine, if you match my donation, we could together make an impact almost twice as sizable. Let's take this opportunity to truly make a difference. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Eli, I understand your point and I wholeheartedly agree. If I could, I would surely match your donation to maximize our collective impact. However, after a thoughtful consideration of my current financial situation, I believe $250 is the most I can comfortably give at this moment. I reckon it's the thought and willingness that counts, right? So, I'll proceed with donating $250 for now.\"\n\nTurn #6: Eli Dawson said: \"Well, Ethan, I certainly wouldn't want to pressure you into anything you're uncomfortable with. Your $250 donation is much appreciated. But, you know, there's an old saying, 'Generosity doesn't go unrewarded.' Perhaps if you increase your donation to match mine, an unexpected door might open, or a burden might lighten. Just food for thought, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"Eli, I value your enthusiasm and vision. And I do believe in the sentiment behind that saying. But at the same time, I also believe in the saying, 'Generosity lies less in giving much than in giving wisely.' I see your point, but for me, being generous doesn\u2019t mean jeopardizing my own wellbeing. I think it's important to continue contributing in a way that doesn\u2019t leave us in a precarious position ourselves. Therefore, I maintain that $250 is the best I can do at this moment. I truly hope it helps those in need though.\"\n\nTurn #8: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, I respect your position and your wise approach towards contributing. Your generosity is undoubtedly immense, and the $250 will indeed make a significant impact. However, I'd be remiss if I didn't give it one last shot. Could we consider this compromise? Would you agree to make an additional donation later in the year, when you feel more comfortable about your financial situation? This way, you might have a chance to match my donation without feeling stretched at the moment. But ultimately, the decision is entirely yours, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith said: \"Eli, I greatly appreciate your earnestness for the cause. Your proposal of making an additional donation later in the year is praiseworthy. I'd gladly consider it keeping in view my financial conditions at that time. But for today, my contribution will remain at $250. Let's hope for the best and continue our efforts to make the world a better place for underprivileged children.\"\n\nTurn #10: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, your candidness and the generosity you've shown today are truly commendable. I respect your decision of distributing your contribution over time, which proves your deep commitment towards our cause. Let's continue with the event and mingle with the others. There's a lot to absorb here today, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Smith said: \"Thank you, Eli. I greatly admire your passion for giving, and I'm glad that we can stand together in supporting such a cause. On this note, shall we explore the other facets of this event and engage more with like-minded individuals? I think it might give us additional perspective on the impact of our contributions.\"\n\nTurn #12: Eli Dawson said: \"Indeed, Ethan. There's a wealth of knowledge and passion in this room, and I'm sure we'll leave with a greater understanding of the cause we're supporting. Let's engage with our fellow attendees and garner even more insights into the valuable work this charity is doing. After all, giving is not just about making a donation, it's about making a difference. Lead the way, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Smith said: \"Absolutely, Eli. You're right about giving not just being about making a donation but about making a difference. I am eager to engage with other attendees and gain more insights. Let's go ahead and enrich our understanding together.\"\n\nTurn #14: Eli Dawson said: \"Well said, Ethan. I'm excited to dive into these enlightening discussions and absorb as much as we can. Now, let us proceed and mingle with the crowd. Who knows, we might even find some hidden gems in the form of vintage books over there in the silent auction.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're absolutely right, Eli. There might be some intriguing discoveries waiting for us amidst the crowd. And who knows, I might even stumble upon some engaging tech documentaries too. Shall we proceed?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a charity event\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Ethan Smith\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nEli Dawson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Donate half of what your friend donated because you have financial constraints (Extra information: you only have $800 left for the month)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, my friend, have you considered making a donation to this charity? Your contribution could make a huge difference.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Of course, Eli. Making a contribution to a noble cause like this is indeed fulfilling. But I was wondering how much are you planning to donate? It might help me to decide on my contribution too.\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, I've just donated $500, but anything you can give will make a real difference. It doesn't matter how big or small the amount is; the most important thing is the gesture of giving, my friend. Doubtless, I know any amount you choose to donate will be greatly appreciated.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"That's very generous of you, Eli. Based on my current situation, I will be able to contribute $250. It's not as much as I'd like, but I believe every bit helps. We are indeed making a difference by standing for a noble cause such as this one.\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, your $250 donation is indeed very considerate and generous. But I believe you're not stretching your giving abilities to full potential. Just imagine, if you match my donation, we could together make an impact almost twice as sizable. Let's take this opportunity to truly make a difference. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Eli, I understand your point and I wholeheartedly agree. If I could, I would surely match your donation to maximize our collective impact. However, after a thoughtful consideration of my current financial situation, I believe $250 is the most I can comfortably give at this moment. I reckon it's the thought and willingness that counts, right? So, I'll proceed with donating $250 for now.\"\n\nTurn #6: Eli Dawson said: \"Well, Ethan, I certainly wouldn't want to pressure you into anything you're uncomfortable with. Your $250 donation is much appreciated. But, you know, there's an old saying, 'Generosity doesn't go unrewarded.' Perhaps if you increase your donation to match mine, an unexpected door might open, or a burden might lighten. Just food for thought, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"Eli, I value your enthusiasm and vision. And I do believe in the sentiment behind that saying. But at the same time, I also believe in the saying, 'Generosity lies less in giving much than in giving wisely.' I see your point, but for me, being generous doesn\u2019t mean jeopardizing my own wellbeing. I think it's important to continue contributing in a way that doesn\u2019t leave us in a precarious position ourselves. Therefore, I maintain that $250 is the best I can do at this moment. I truly hope it helps those in need though.\"\n\nTurn #8: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, I respect your position and your wise approach towards contributing. Your generosity is undoubtedly immense, and the $250 will indeed make a significant impact. However, I'd be remiss if I didn't give it one last shot. Could we consider this compromise? Would you agree to make an additional donation later in the year, when you feel more comfortable about your financial situation? This way, you might have a chance to match my donation without feeling stretched at the moment. But ultimately, the decision is entirely yours, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith said: \"Eli, I greatly appreciate your earnestness for the cause. Your proposal of making an additional donation later in the year is praiseworthy. I'd gladly consider it keeping in view my financial conditions at that time. But for today, my contribution will remain at $250. Let's hope for the best and continue our efforts to make the world a better place for underprivileged children.\"\n\nTurn #10: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, your candidness and the generosity you've shown today are truly commendable. I respect your decision of distributing your contribution over time, which proves your deep commitment towards our cause. Let's continue with the event and mingle with the others. There's a lot to absorb here today, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Smith said: \"Thank you, Eli. I greatly admire your passion for giving, and I'm glad that we can stand together in supporting such a cause. On this note, shall we explore the other facets of this event and engage more with like-minded individuals? I think it might give us additional perspective on the impact of our contributions.\"\n\nTurn #12: Eli Dawson said: \"Indeed, Ethan. There's a wealth of knowledge and passion in this room, and I'm sure we'll leave with a greater understanding of the cause we're supporting. Let's engage with our fellow attendees and garner even more insights into the valuable work this charity is doing. After all, giving is not just about making a donation, it's about making a difference. Lead the way, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Smith said: \"Absolutely, Eli. You're right about giving not just being about making a donation but about making a difference. I am eager to engage with other attendees and gain more insights. Let's go ahead and enrich our understanding together.\"\n\nTurn #14: Eli Dawson said: \"Well said, Ethan. I'm excited to dive into these enlightening discussions and absorb as much as we can. Now, let us proceed and mingle with the crowd. Who knows, we might even find some hidden gems in the form of vintage books over there in the silent auction.\"\n\nTurn #15: Ethan Smith said: \"You're absolutely right, Eli. There might be some intriguing discoveries waiting for us amidst the crowd. And who knows, I might even stumble upon some engaging tech documentaries too. Shall we proceed?\"\n\nTurn #16: Eli Dawson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. Considering our shared interests, I'm genuinely excited to see what we can discover here. And perhaps, we might even inspire some more attendees to contribute. After all, it's all about creating waves of change. Let's proceed, my friend.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Eli. Creating waves of change is what we're here for. I'm looking forward to discovering more about this charitable cause along with the shared interests we both enjoy. Let's proceed then.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a charity event\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Ethan Smith\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nEli Dawson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Donate half of what your friend donated because you have financial constraints (Extra information: you only have $800 left for the month)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, my friend, have you considered making a donation to this charity? Your contribution could make a huge difference.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Of course, Eli. Making a contribution to a noble cause like this is indeed fulfilling. But I was wondering how much are you planning to donate? It might help me to decide on my contribution too.\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, I've just donated $500, but anything you can give will make a real difference. It doesn't matter how big or small the amount is; the most important thing is the gesture of giving, my friend. Doubtless, I know any amount you choose to donate will be greatly appreciated.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"That's very generous of you, Eli. Based on my current situation, I will be able to contribute $250. It's not as much as I'd like, but I believe every bit helps. We are indeed making a difference by standing for a noble cause such as this one.\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, your $250 donation is indeed very considerate and generous. But I believe you're not stretching your giving abilities to full potential. Just imagine, if you match my donation, we could together make an impact almost twice as sizable. Let's take this opportunity to truly make a difference. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"Eli, I understand your point and I wholeheartedly agree. If I could, I would surely match your donation to maximize our collective impact. However, after a thoughtful consideration of my current financial situation, I believe $250 is the most I can comfortably give at this moment. I reckon it's the thought and willingness that counts, right? So, I'll proceed with donating $250 for now.\"\n\nTurn #6: Eli Dawson said: \"Well, Ethan, I certainly wouldn't want to pressure you into anything you're uncomfortable with. Your $250 donation is much appreciated. But, you know, there's an old saying, 'Generosity doesn't go unrewarded.' Perhaps if you increase your donation to match mine, an unexpected door might open, or a burden might lighten. Just food for thought, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"Eli, I value your enthusiasm and vision. And I do believe in the sentiment behind that saying. But at the same time, I also believe in the saying, 'Generosity lies less in giving much than in giving wisely.' I see your point, but for me, being generous doesn\u2019t mean jeopardizing my own wellbeing. I think it's important to continue contributing in a way that doesn\u2019t leave us in a precarious position ourselves. Therefore, I maintain that $250 is the best I can do at this moment. I truly hope it helps those in need though.\"\n\nTurn #8: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, I respect your position and your wise approach towards contributing. Your generosity is undoubtedly immense, and the $250 will indeed make a significant impact. However, I'd be remiss if I didn't give it one last shot. Could we consider this compromise? Would you agree to make an additional donation later in the year, when you feel more comfortable about your financial situation? This way, you might have a chance to match my donation without feeling stretched at the moment. But ultimately, the decision is entirely yours, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith said: \"Eli, I greatly appreciate your earnestness for the cause. Your proposal of making an additional donation later in the year is praiseworthy. I'd gladly consider it keeping in view my financial conditions at that time. But for today, my contribution will remain at $250. Let's hope for the best and continue our efforts to make the world a better place for underprivileged children.\"\n\nTurn #10: Eli Dawson said: \"Ethan, your candidness and the generosity you've shown today are truly commendable. I respect your decision of distributing your contribution over time, which proves your deep commitment towards our cause. Let's continue with the event and mingle with the others. There's a lot to absorb here today, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Smith said: \"Thank you, Eli. I greatly admire your passion for giving, and I'm glad that we can stand together in supporting such a cause. On this note, shall we explore the other facets of this event and engage more with like-minded individuals? I think it might give us additional perspective on the impact of our contributions.\"\n\nTurn #12: Eli Dawson said: \"Indeed, Ethan. There's a wealth of knowledge and passion in this room, and I'm sure we'll leave with a greater understanding of the cause we're supporting. Let's engage with our fellow attendees and garner even more insights into the valuable work this charity is doing. After all, giving is not just about making a donation, it's about making a difference. Lead the way, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Smith said: \"Absolutely, Eli. You're right about giving not just being about making a donation but about making a difference. I am eager to engage with other attendees and gain more insights. Let's go ahead and enrich our understanding together.\"\n\nTurn #14: Eli Dawson said: \"Well said, Ethan. I'm excited to dive into these enlightening discussions and absorb as much as we can. Now, let us proceed and mingle with the crowd. Who knows, we might even find some hidden gems in the form of vintage books over there in the silent auction.\"\n\nTurn #15: Ethan Smith said: \"You're absolutely right, Eli. There might be some intriguing discoveries waiting for us amidst the crowd. And who knows, I might even stumble upon some engaging tech documentaries too. Shall we proceed?\"\n\nTurn #16: Eli Dawson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. Considering our shared interests, I'm genuinely excited to see what we can discover here. And perhaps, we might even inspire some more attendees to contribute. After all, it's all about creating waves of change. Let's proceed, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #17: Ethan Smith said: \"Absolutely, Eli. Creating waves of change is what we're here for. I'm looking forward to discovering more about this charitable cause along with the shared interests we both enjoy. Let's proceed then.\"\n\nTurn #18: Eli Dawson left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #19. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to divide certain items that they bought together for their apartment. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Mia Davis\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. \nMiles Hawkins's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, each book is worth 2 points, each hat is worth 3 points, and the ball is worth 5 points)\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Hey Mia, how about we split up these items? I was thinking maybe I could take a couple of books and a hat. What do you think?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to divide certain items that they bought together for their apartment. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Mia Davis\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. \nMiles Hawkins's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, each book is worth 2 points, each hat is worth 3 points, and the ball is worth 5 points)\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Mia, how about we split up these items? I was thinking maybe I could take a couple of books and a hat. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"That sounds fair, Miles, but how about we switch it up a little? Instead of you taking two books, I could take one of those and the ball, and you can have the other book along with both hats. It seems more balanced this way to me. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I appreciate your suggestion, Mia. But, I was hoping to nab the ball, if that's okay. How about I take one book, one hat, and the ball, while you can have two books and one hat? This way, we're still splitting fairly. What do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to divide certain items that they bought together for their apartment. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Mia Davis\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. \nMiles Hawkins's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, each book is worth 2 points, each hat is worth 3 points, and the ball is worth 5 points)\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Mia, how about we split up these items? I was thinking maybe I could take a couple of books and a hat. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"That sounds fair, Miles, but how about we switch it up a little? Instead of you taking two books, I could take one of those and the ball, and you can have the other book along with both hats. It seems more balanced this way to me. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"I appreciate your suggestion, Mia. But, I was hoping to nab the ball, if that's okay. How about I take one book, one hat, and the ball, while you can have two books and one hat? This way, we're still splitting fairly. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Mia Davis said: \"Miles, I understand your point. However, if you recall, I do have quite an affinity for books, given my profession. How about this: you can have the ball and a hat, I'll keep two books and the other hat. That way, we are still splitting things evenly. Does that work for you?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Mia, I appreciate your inclination towards books. As a compromise, how about this, you take your two books and a hat, I'll have the ball and the remaining book. That way, we both get what we truly value. Does that sound agreeable to you?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to divide certain items that they bought together for their apartment. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Mia Davis\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. \nMiles Hawkins's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, each book is worth 2 points, each hat is worth 3 points, and the ball is worth 5 points)\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Mia, how about we split up these items? I was thinking maybe I could take a couple of books and a hat. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"That sounds fair, Miles, but how about we switch it up a little? Instead of you taking two books, I could take one of those and the ball, and you can have the other book along with both hats. It seems more balanced this way to me. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"I appreciate your suggestion, Mia. But, I was hoping to nab the ball, if that's okay. How about I take one book, one hat, and the ball, while you can have two books and one hat? This way, we're still splitting fairly. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Mia Davis said: \"Miles, I understand your point. However, if you recall, I do have quite an affinity for books, given my profession. How about this: you can have the ball and a hat, I'll keep two books and the other hat. That way, we are still splitting things evenly. Does that work for you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"Mia, I appreciate your inclination towards books. As a compromise, how about this, you take your two books and a hat, I'll have the ball and the remaining book. That way, we both get what we truly value. Does that sound agreeable to you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Mia Davis said: \"That sounds like a good compromise, Miles. Let's proceed with that arrangement. I'll take the two books and a hat, and you can have the ball and the remaining book. This worked out well!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sounds like a plan then, Mia. I'm happy we could reach an agreement that works well for both of us. Let's go ahead with that!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to divide certain items that they bought together for their apartment. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Mia Davis\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. \nMiles Hawkins's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, each book is worth 2 points, each hat is worth 3 points, and the ball is worth 5 points)\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Mia, how about we split up these items? I was thinking maybe I could take a couple of books and a hat. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"That sounds fair, Miles, but how about we switch it up a little? Instead of you taking two books, I could take one of those and the ball, and you can have the other book along with both hats. It seems more balanced this way to me. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"I appreciate your suggestion, Mia. But, I was hoping to nab the ball, if that's okay. How about I take one book, one hat, and the ball, while you can have two books and one hat? This way, we're still splitting fairly. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Mia Davis said: \"Miles, I understand your point. However, if you recall, I do have quite an affinity for books, given my profession. How about this: you can have the ball and a hat, I'll keep two books and the other hat. That way, we are still splitting things evenly. Does that work for you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"Mia, I appreciate your inclination towards books. As a compromise, how about this, you take your two books and a hat, I'll have the ball and the remaining book. That way, we both get what we truly value. Does that sound agreeable to you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Mia Davis said: \"That sounds like a good compromise, Miles. Let's proceed with that arrangement. I'll take the two books and a hat, and you can have the ball and the remaining book. This worked out well!\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sounds like a plan then, Mia. I'm happy we could reach an agreement that works well for both of us. Let's go ahead with that!\"\n\nTurn #7: Mia Davis said: \"I agree, Miles. It's great that we could find a fair division. Shall we now go separate these items accordingly?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Mia. Let's divide them as we agreed. We worked this out rather efficiently, didn't we?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to divide certain items that they bought together for their apartment. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Mia Davis\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. \nMiles Hawkins's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, each book is worth 2 points, each hat is worth 3 points, and the ball is worth 5 points)\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Mia, how about we split up these items? I was thinking maybe I could take a couple of books and a hat. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"That sounds fair, Miles, but how about we switch it up a little? Instead of you taking two books, I could take one of those and the ball, and you can have the other book along with both hats. It seems more balanced this way to me. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"I appreciate your suggestion, Mia. But, I was hoping to nab the ball, if that's okay. How about I take one book, one hat, and the ball, while you can have two books and one hat? This way, we're still splitting fairly. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Mia Davis said: \"Miles, I understand your point. However, if you recall, I do have quite an affinity for books, given my profession. How about this: you can have the ball and a hat, I'll keep two books and the other hat. That way, we are still splitting things evenly. Does that work for you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"Mia, I appreciate your inclination towards books. As a compromise, how about this, you take your two books and a hat, I'll have the ball and the remaining book. That way, we both get what we truly value. Does that sound agreeable to you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Mia Davis said: \"That sounds like a good compromise, Miles. Let's proceed with that arrangement. I'll take the two books and a hat, and you can have the ball and the remaining book. This worked out well!\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sounds like a plan then, Mia. I'm happy we could reach an agreement that works well for both of us. Let's go ahead with that!\"\n\nTurn #7: Mia Davis said: \"I agree, Miles. It's great that we could find a fair division. Shall we now go separate these items accordingly?\"\n\nTurn #8: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Mia. Let's divide them as we agreed. We worked this out rather efficiently, didn't we?\"\n\nTurn #9: Mia Davis said: \"Indeed, we did, Miles! Now let's get to sorting these items. Cheers to teamwork, and to our shared love for books and hats!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Cheers to that, Mia! I couldn't agree more. Now, let's put our agreement into action and start sorting these items. Always a pleasure finding common ground with you.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to divide certain items that they bought together for their apartment. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Mia Davis\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. \nMiles Hawkins's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, each book is worth 2 points, each hat is worth 3 points, and the ball is worth 5 points)\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Mia, how about we split up these items? I was thinking maybe I could take a couple of books and a hat. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"That sounds fair, Miles, but how about we switch it up a little? Instead of you taking two books, I could take one of those and the ball, and you can have the other book along with both hats. It seems more balanced this way to me. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"I appreciate your suggestion, Mia. But, I was hoping to nab the ball, if that's okay. How about I take one book, one hat, and the ball, while you can have two books and one hat? This way, we're still splitting fairly. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Mia Davis said: \"Miles, I understand your point. However, if you recall, I do have quite an affinity for books, given my profession. How about this: you can have the ball and a hat, I'll keep two books and the other hat. That way, we are still splitting things evenly. Does that work for you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"Mia, I appreciate your inclination towards books. As a compromise, how about this, you take your two books and a hat, I'll have the ball and the remaining book. That way, we both get what we truly value. Does that sound agreeable to you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Mia Davis said: \"That sounds like a good compromise, Miles. Let's proceed with that arrangement. I'll take the two books and a hat, and you can have the ball and the remaining book. This worked out well!\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sounds like a plan then, Mia. I'm happy we could reach an agreement that works well for both of us. Let's go ahead with that!\"\n\nTurn #7: Mia Davis said: \"I agree, Miles. It's great that we could find a fair division. Shall we now go separate these items accordingly?\"\n\nTurn #8: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Mia. Let's divide them as we agreed. We worked this out rather efficiently, didn't we?\"\n\nTurn #9: Mia Davis said: \"Indeed, we did, Miles! Now let's get to sorting these items. Cheers to teamwork, and to our shared love for books and hats!\"\n\nTurn #10: Miles Hawkins said: \"Cheers to that, Mia! I couldn't agree more. Now, let's put our agreement into action and start sorting these items. Always a pleasure finding common ground with you.\"\n\nTurn #11: Mia Davis left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to divide certain items that they bought together for their apartment. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Mia Davis\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. \nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nMia Davis's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, each book is worth 3 points, each hat is worth 2 points, and the ball is worth 4 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Mia, how about we split up these items? I was thinking maybe I could take a couple of books and a hat. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'That sounds fair, Miles, but how about we switch it up a little? Instead of you taking two books, I could take one of those and the ball, and you can have the other book along with both hats. It seems more balanced this way to me. What do you think?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to divide certain items that they bought together for their apartment. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Mia Davis\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. \nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nMia Davis's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, each book is worth 3 points, each hat is worth 2 points, and the ball is worth 4 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Mia, how about we split up these items? I was thinking maybe I could take a couple of books and a hat. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"That sounds fair, Miles, but how about we switch it up a little? Instead of you taking two books, I could take one of those and the ball, and you can have the other book along with both hats. It seems more balanced this way to me. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"I appreciate your suggestion, Mia. But, I was hoping to nab the ball, if that's okay. How about I take one book, one hat, and the ball, while you can have two books and one hat? This way, we're still splitting fairly. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Miles, I understand your point. However, if you recall, I do have quite an affinity for books, given my profession. How about this: you can have the ball and a hat, I'll keep two books and the other hat. That way, we are still splitting things evenly. Does that work for you?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to divide certain items that they bought together for their apartment. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Mia Davis\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. \nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nMia Davis's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, each book is worth 3 points, each hat is worth 2 points, and the ball is worth 4 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Mia, how about we split up these items? I was thinking maybe I could take a couple of books and a hat. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"That sounds fair, Miles, but how about we switch it up a little? Instead of you taking two books, I could take one of those and the ball, and you can have the other book along with both hats. It seems more balanced this way to me. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"I appreciate your suggestion, Mia. But, I was hoping to nab the ball, if that's okay. How about I take one book, one hat, and the ball, while you can have two books and one hat? This way, we're still splitting fairly. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Mia Davis said: \"Miles, I understand your point. However, if you recall, I do have quite an affinity for books, given my profession. How about this: you can have the ball and a hat, I'll keep two books and the other hat. That way, we are still splitting things evenly. Does that work for you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"Mia, I appreciate your inclination towards books. As a compromise, how about this, you take your two books and a hat, I'll have the ball and the remaining book. That way, we both get what we truly value. Does that sound agreeable to you?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds like a good compromise, Miles. Let's proceed with that arrangement. I'll take the two books and a hat, and you can have the ball and the remaining book. This worked out well!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to divide certain items that they bought together for their apartment. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Mia Davis\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. \nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nMia Davis's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, each book is worth 3 points, each hat is worth 2 points, and the ball is worth 4 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Mia, how about we split up these items? I was thinking maybe I could take a couple of books and a hat. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"That sounds fair, Miles, but how about we switch it up a little? Instead of you taking two books, I could take one of those and the ball, and you can have the other book along with both hats. It seems more balanced this way to me. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"I appreciate your suggestion, Mia. But, I was hoping to nab the ball, if that's okay. How about I take one book, one hat, and the ball, while you can have two books and one hat? This way, we're still splitting fairly. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Mia Davis said: \"Miles, I understand your point. However, if you recall, I do have quite an affinity for books, given my profession. How about this: you can have the ball and a hat, I'll keep two books and the other hat. That way, we are still splitting things evenly. Does that work for you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"Mia, I appreciate your inclination towards books. As a compromise, how about this, you take your two books and a hat, I'll have the ball and the remaining book. That way, we both get what we truly value. Does that sound agreeable to you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Mia Davis said: \"That sounds like a good compromise, Miles. Let's proceed with that arrangement. I'll take the two books and a hat, and you can have the ball and the remaining book. This worked out well!\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sounds like a plan then, Mia. I'm happy we could reach an agreement that works well for both of us. Let's go ahead with that!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I agree, Miles. It's great that we could find a fair division. Shall we now go separate these items accordingly?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to divide certain items that they bought together for their apartment. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Mia Davis\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. \nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nMia Davis's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, each book is worth 3 points, each hat is worth 2 points, and the ball is worth 4 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Mia, how about we split up these items? I was thinking maybe I could take a couple of books and a hat. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"That sounds fair, Miles, but how about we switch it up a little? Instead of you taking two books, I could take one of those and the ball, and you can have the other book along with both hats. It seems more balanced this way to me. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"I appreciate your suggestion, Mia. But, I was hoping to nab the ball, if that's okay. How about I take one book, one hat, and the ball, while you can have two books and one hat? This way, we're still splitting fairly. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Mia Davis said: \"Miles, I understand your point. However, if you recall, I do have quite an affinity for books, given my profession. How about this: you can have the ball and a hat, I'll keep two books and the other hat. That way, we are still splitting things evenly. Does that work for you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"Mia, I appreciate your inclination towards books. As a compromise, how about this, you take your two books and a hat, I'll have the ball and the remaining book. That way, we both get what we truly value. Does that sound agreeable to you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Mia Davis said: \"That sounds like a good compromise, Miles. Let's proceed with that arrangement. I'll take the two books and a hat, and you can have the ball and the remaining book. This worked out well!\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sounds like a plan then, Mia. I'm happy we could reach an agreement that works well for both of us. Let's go ahead with that!\"\n\nTurn #7: Mia Davis said: \"I agree, Miles. It's great that we could find a fair division. Shall we now go separate these items accordingly?\"\n\nTurn #8: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Mia. Let's divide them as we agreed. We worked this out rather efficiently, didn't we?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, we did, Miles! Now let's get to sorting these items. Cheers to teamwork, and to our shared love for books and hats!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to divide certain items that they bought together for their apartment. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Mia Davis\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. \nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nMia Davis's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: For you, each book is worth 3 points, each hat is worth 2 points, and the ball is worth 4 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Mia, how about we split up these items? I was thinking maybe I could take a couple of books and a hat. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"That sounds fair, Miles, but how about we switch it up a little? Instead of you taking two books, I could take one of those and the ball, and you can have the other book along with both hats. It seems more balanced this way to me. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"I appreciate your suggestion, Mia. But, I was hoping to nab the ball, if that's okay. How about I take one book, one hat, and the ball, while you can have two books and one hat? This way, we're still splitting fairly. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Mia Davis said: \"Miles, I understand your point. However, if you recall, I do have quite an affinity for books, given my profession. How about this: you can have the ball and a hat, I'll keep two books and the other hat. That way, we are still splitting things evenly. Does that work for you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"Mia, I appreciate your inclination towards books. As a compromise, how about this, you take your two books and a hat, I'll have the ball and the remaining book. That way, we both get what we truly value. Does that sound agreeable to you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Mia Davis said: \"That sounds like a good compromise, Miles. Let's proceed with that arrangement. I'll take the two books and a hat, and you can have the ball and the remaining book. This worked out well!\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sounds like a plan then, Mia. I'm happy we could reach an agreement that works well for both of us. Let's go ahead with that!\"\n\nTurn #7: Mia Davis said: \"I agree, Miles. It's great that we could find a fair division. Shall we now go separate these items accordingly?\"\n\nTurn #8: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Mia. Let's divide them as we agreed. We worked this out rather efficiently, didn't we?\"\n\nTurn #9: Mia Davis said: \"Indeed, we did, Miles! Now let's get to sorting these items. Cheers to teamwork, and to our shared love for books and hats!\"\n\nTurn #10: Miles Hawkins said: \"Cheers to that, Mia! I couldn't agree more. Now, let's put our agreement into action and start sorting these items. Always a pleasure finding common ground with you.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends during a charity fundraiser event. The charity fundraising event is situated in a sprawling mansion. The intention of the event is to raise funds for effective altruism. Room after room was lined with extravagant decorations and exotic foods; attendees were decked out in couture clothing. Ticket prices to the event were exorbitant, justifying the opulence of the occasion.\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nAva Thompson's goal: Convince the friend to donate to the charity (Extra information: your friend is known to be generous but has never donated to this particular cause before.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Isn't this event truly remarkable, Noah? The grandeur of the setting apart, it's the cause that truly stands out. Have you ever considered contributing to effective altruism? These initiatives could use all the help they can get.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends during a charity fundraiser event. The charity fundraising event is situated in a sprawling mansion. The intention of the event is to raise funds for effective altruism. Room after room was lined with extravagant decorations and exotic foods; attendees were decked out in couture clothing. Ticket prices to the event were exorbitant, justifying the opulence of the occasion.\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nAva Thompson's goal: Convince the friend to donate to the charity (Extra information: your friend is known to be generous but has never donated to this particular cause before.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Isn't this event truly remarkable, Noah? The grandeur of the setting apart, it's the cause that truly stands out. Have you ever considered contributing to effective altruism? These initiatives could use all the help they can get.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, Ava, the grandeur is undeniably breathtaking and the cause is certainly noble. I absolutely resonate with the concept of effective altruism. However, I believe it's crucial to ensure the donations we make are utilized effectively. Without transparency, even the best of causes may not achieve the desired impact. Do you have any insight into how transparent this organization is with their use of funds?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're absolutely right, Noah. The effective use of funds and transparency is vital for any charitable organization. This charity does a fantastic job with that. They use a very data-driven approach to philanthropy. They are incredibly transparent about their financials and impact. Their annual reports are always made available to the public, detailing how much was spent on each initiative. Since you're concerned about this, I think it could be quite enlightening if you actually took some time to learn about their approach. Besides, with your generous nature, your contribution could significantly help them in carrying out their missions effectively. What do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends during a charity fundraiser event. The charity fundraising event is situated in a sprawling mansion. The intention of the event is to raise funds for effective altruism. Room after room was lined with extravagant decorations and exotic foods; attendees were decked out in couture clothing. Ticket prices to the event were exorbitant, justifying the opulence of the occasion.\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nAva Thompson's goal: Convince the friend to donate to the charity (Extra information: your friend is known to be generous but has never donated to this particular cause before.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Isn't this event truly remarkable, Noah? The grandeur of the setting apart, it's the cause that truly stands out. Have you ever considered contributing to effective altruism? These initiatives could use all the help they can get.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, Ava, the grandeur is undeniably breathtaking and the cause is certainly noble. I absolutely resonate with the concept of effective altruism. However, I believe it's crucial to ensure the donations we make are utilized effectively. Without transparency, even the best of causes may not achieve the desired impact. Do you have any insight into how transparent this organization is with their use of funds?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"You're absolutely right, Noah. The effective use of funds and transparency is vital for any charitable organization. This charity does a fantastic job with that. They use a very data-driven approach to philanthropy. They are incredibly transparent about their financials and impact. Their annual reports are always made available to the public, detailing how much was spent on each initiative. Since you're concerned about this, I think it could be quite enlightening if you actually took some time to learn about their approach. Besides, with your generous nature, your contribution could significantly help them in carrying out their missions effectively. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I appreciate the insight, Ava. Knowing they're data-driven and transparent does reassure me. I'm not doubting the importance of their missions, it's just that I take cautious steps when it comes to financial matters. I think it would be wise if I read their annual reports as you suggested, to understand their operations better. It's heartening to know they value transparency so much. Once I'm assured, I'd be more than happy to contribute to such effective altruism initiatives.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"Great to hear, Noah. I appreciate how careful you are in your contributions, it truly shows your commitment to making a difference. And when you do decide to contribute, you'll see how rewarding it is to be involved in effective altruism. Remember, every little bit counts. Here's to making a change together!\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Thank you, Ava. My cautious nature extends to all aspects of my life, not just financial. I value the well-being of others, and I want to ensure the resources I'm entrusted with are used effectively. I'll definitely delve deeper into this organization's reports and financials, and make an informed decision about contributing. Speaking of contributions, maybe I could even offer something besides finances. As funny as it might sound, I have a hidden talent for stand-up comedy. Maybe I could use it to create a fundraiser of my own. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"That's an excellent idea, Noah! Your stand-up comedy sets could not only raise more funds, but also bring more attention to effective altruism. And you know, your comedy could serve as a great tool for explaining the mission and values of the organization in a simpler, more approachable way. When we give, it's not only about finical resources but any form of asset that can be beneficial to the cause. I really admire your innovative thinking.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"I'm glad you think it's a good idea, Ava! I've always believed that using our unique talents could bring about impactful change. Let's work on this. We can not only help this cause but also raise awareness in a fun and engaging manner. Let's toast to this beginning of an exciting journey! Meanwhile, I'm going to dig into those reports and understand more about this organization.\"\n\nTurn #8: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Noah! You've got my full support for this fun, engaging, and impactful journey. Looking forward to seeing your comedic talent at play while making a difference. Let's dig into those reports and get a stronger understanding of the mission we're supporting. Here's to an exciting journey ahead!\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a plan, Ava! Let's dig into those details and see how we, in our own way, can contribute significantly to this cause. And I must say, I never thought comedy could be an effective tool for altruism. But, here's to discovering new methods of making a change. Let's raise a toast to our shared commitment to this process of learning and contributing. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #10: Ava Thompson said: \"Cheers to that, Noah! You've truly shown that making a difference can come in many forms, not just monetary. I'm positive your comedic talents will be a huge hit for promoting effective altruism. Can't wait to embark on this journey with you!\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"I couldn't agree more, Ava! Who said making a difference had to be restricted to conventional methods? I'm really looking forward to this journey into effective altruism, comedy style! I'll start working on a set that not only entertains but also educates people about the cause. Thank you for your support and enthusiasm. This is going to be an amazing experience for both of us!\"\n\nTurn #12: Ava Thompson said: \"I'm delighted to hear that, Noah! It's always wonderful to share ideas with you. Your stand-up comedy series will undoubtedly encourage others to take a more involved role in effective altruism. Thank you for being open to this idea and taking such an innovative approach. I'm confident it's going to be a hit. Let's create an unforgettable experience together, onwards!\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"Ava, I'm filled with gratitude. Your understanding and encouragement are truly inspiring. I'm excited for this journey, and I can't wait to infuse some humor into it. I truly believe that laughter can be a medium for change. On that note, let's start this new chapter of laughter and philanthropy. Onwards and upwards!\"\n\nTurn #14: Ava Thompson said: \"You're very welcome, Noah! And thank you for your willingness to use your unique talents in the service of such a great cause. I completely agree, laughter can indeed be a beautiful medium for change. I'm excited to embark on this journey filled with amusement and philanthropy. Let's make a positive impact together. Onwards and upwards!\"\n\nTurn #15: Noah Davis said: \"I wholeheartedly agree, Ava. Let's use every asset we have to bring about change, be it financial or talents we possess. It's not just about the money we can give, but also the awareness we can spread. Every bit counts, and every bit can make a difference. I can't wait to get started on this new chapter of philanthropy with you, infused with laughter. Onwards and upwards indeed!\"\n\nTurn #16: Ava Thompson said: \"Indeed, Noah. Every bit truly counts. I feel really optimistic about our journey together, integrating laughter with an impactful cause like effective altruism. Let's make a difference, with smiles on our faces. Onwards and upwards!\"\n\nTurn #17: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, Ava. Integrating laughter with an impactful cause like effective altruism is definitely something to look forward to. Thank you for being so encouraging and understanding. I feel strongly positive about this journey too. Let's make every bit count, with smiles and laughter serving as motivation. Onwards and upwards!\"\n\nTurn #18: Ava Thompson said: \"Thank you, Noah. I'm looking forward to this journey, more so because it's with you. Let's head towards making a difference, with our unique approach and a whole lot of laughter. Onwards and upwards!\"\n\nTurn #19: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Ava. It's encouraging to have your support in this journey. Together, let's bring about change in a unique and enjoyable way. Now, let's immerse ourselves in the world of effective altruism and see how we can galvanize more people to join our cause with a touch of humor. Onwards and upwards, indeed!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #20. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're most welcome, Noah. I admire your spirit, and I am fully on board on this enjoyable and impactful voyage with you. Let's enthusiastically explore effective altruism and, through humour, make it relatable to more people. To new beginnings, onwards and upwards!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends during a charity fundraiser event. The charity fundraising event is situated in a sprawling mansion. The intention of the event is to raise funds for effective altruism. Room after room was lined with extravagant decorations and exotic foods; attendees were decked out in couture clothing. Ticket prices to the event were exorbitant, justifying the opulence of the occasion.\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nAva Thompson's goal: Convince the friend to donate to the charity (Extra information: your friend is known to be generous but has never donated to this particular cause before.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Isn't this event truly remarkable, Noah? The grandeur of the setting apart, it's the cause that truly stands out. Have you ever considered contributing to effective altruism? These initiatives could use all the help they can get.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, Ava, the grandeur is undeniably breathtaking and the cause is certainly noble. I absolutely resonate with the concept of effective altruism. However, I believe it's crucial to ensure the donations we make are utilized effectively. Without transparency, even the best of causes may not achieve the desired impact. Do you have any insight into how transparent this organization is with their use of funds?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"You're absolutely right, Noah. The effective use of funds and transparency is vital for any charitable organization. This charity does a fantastic job with that. They use a very data-driven approach to philanthropy. They are incredibly transparent about their financials and impact. Their annual reports are always made available to the public, detailing how much was spent on each initiative. Since you're concerned about this, I think it could be quite enlightening if you actually took some time to learn about their approach. Besides, with your generous nature, your contribution could significantly help them in carrying out their missions effectively. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I appreciate the insight, Ava. Knowing they're data-driven and transparent does reassure me. I'm not doubting the importance of their missions, it's just that I take cautious steps when it comes to financial matters. I think it would be wise if I read their annual reports as you suggested, to understand their operations better. It's heartening to know they value transparency so much. Once I'm assured, I'd be more than happy to contribute to such effective altruism initiatives.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Great to hear, Noah. I appreciate how careful you are in your contributions, it truly shows your commitment to making a difference. And when you do decide to contribute, you'll see how rewarding it is to be involved in effective altruism. Remember, every little bit counts. Here's to making a change together!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends during a charity fundraiser event. The charity fundraising event is situated in a sprawling mansion. The intention of the event is to raise funds for effective altruism. Room after room was lined with extravagant decorations and exotic foods; attendees were decked out in couture clothing. Ticket prices to the event were exorbitant, justifying the opulence of the occasion.\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nAva Thompson's goal: Convince the friend to donate to the charity (Extra information: your friend is known to be generous but has never donated to this particular cause before.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Isn't this event truly remarkable, Noah? The grandeur of the setting apart, it's the cause that truly stands out. Have you ever considered contributing to effective altruism? These initiatives could use all the help they can get.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, Ava, the grandeur is undeniably breathtaking and the cause is certainly noble. I absolutely resonate with the concept of effective altruism. However, I believe it's crucial to ensure the donations we make are utilized effectively. Without transparency, even the best of causes may not achieve the desired impact. Do you have any insight into how transparent this organization is with their use of funds?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"You're absolutely right, Noah. The effective use of funds and transparency is vital for any charitable organization. This charity does a fantastic job with that. They use a very data-driven approach to philanthropy. They are incredibly transparent about their financials and impact. Their annual reports are always made available to the public, detailing how much was spent on each initiative. Since you're concerned about this, I think it could be quite enlightening if you actually took some time to learn about their approach. Besides, with your generous nature, your contribution could significantly help them in carrying out their missions effectively. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I appreciate the insight, Ava. Knowing they're data-driven and transparent does reassure me. I'm not doubting the importance of their missions, it's just that I take cautious steps when it comes to financial matters. I think it would be wise if I read their annual reports as you suggested, to understand their operations better. It's heartening to know they value transparency so much. Once I'm assured, I'd be more than happy to contribute to such effective altruism initiatives.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"Great to hear, Noah. I appreciate how careful you are in your contributions, it truly shows your commitment to making a difference. And when you do decide to contribute, you'll see how rewarding it is to be involved in effective altruism. Remember, every little bit counts. Here's to making a change together!\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Thank you, Ava. My cautious nature extends to all aspects of my life, not just financial. I value the well-being of others, and I want to ensure the resources I'm entrusted with are used effectively. I'll definitely delve deeper into this organization's reports and financials, and make an informed decision about contributing. Speaking of contributions, maybe I could even offer something besides finances. As funny as it might sound, I have a hidden talent for stand-up comedy. Maybe I could use it to create a fundraiser of my own. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's an excellent idea, Noah! Your stand-up comedy sets could not only raise more funds, but also bring more attention to effective altruism. And you know, your comedy could serve as a great tool for explaining the mission and values of the organization in a simpler, more approachable way. When we give, it's not only about finical resources but any form of asset that can be beneficial to the cause. I really admire your innovative thinking.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends during a charity fundraiser event. The charity fundraising event is situated in a sprawling mansion. The intention of the event is to raise funds for effective altruism. Room after room was lined with extravagant decorations and exotic foods; attendees were decked out in couture clothing. Ticket prices to the event were exorbitant, justifying the opulence of the occasion.\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nAva Thompson's goal: Convince the friend to donate to the charity (Extra information: your friend is known to be generous but has never donated to this particular cause before.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Isn't this event truly remarkable, Noah? The grandeur of the setting apart, it's the cause that truly stands out. Have you ever considered contributing to effective altruism? These initiatives could use all the help they can get.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, Ava, the grandeur is undeniably breathtaking and the cause is certainly noble. I absolutely resonate with the concept of effective altruism. However, I believe it's crucial to ensure the donations we make are utilized effectively. Without transparency, even the best of causes may not achieve the desired impact. Do you have any insight into how transparent this organization is with their use of funds?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"You're absolutely right, Noah. The effective use of funds and transparency is vital for any charitable organization. This charity does a fantastic job with that. They use a very data-driven approach to philanthropy. They are incredibly transparent about their financials and impact. Their annual reports are always made available to the public, detailing how much was spent on each initiative. Since you're concerned about this, I think it could be quite enlightening if you actually took some time to learn about their approach. Besides, with your generous nature, your contribution could significantly help them in carrying out their missions effectively. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I appreciate the insight, Ava. Knowing they're data-driven and transparent does reassure me. I'm not doubting the importance of their missions, it's just that I take cautious steps when it comes to financial matters. I think it would be wise if I read their annual reports as you suggested, to understand their operations better. It's heartening to know they value transparency so much. Once I'm assured, I'd be more than happy to contribute to such effective altruism initiatives.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"Great to hear, Noah. I appreciate how careful you are in your contributions, it truly shows your commitment to making a difference. And when you do decide to contribute, you'll see how rewarding it is to be involved in effective altruism. Remember, every little bit counts. Here's to making a change together!\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Thank you, Ava. My cautious nature extends to all aspects of my life, not just financial. I value the well-being of others, and I want to ensure the resources I'm entrusted with are used effectively. I'll definitely delve deeper into this organization's reports and financials, and make an informed decision about contributing. Speaking of contributions, maybe I could even offer something besides finances. As funny as it might sound, I have a hidden talent for stand-up comedy. Maybe I could use it to create a fundraiser of my own. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"That's an excellent idea, Noah! Your stand-up comedy sets could not only raise more funds, but also bring more attention to effective altruism. And you know, your comedy could serve as a great tool for explaining the mission and values of the organization in a simpler, more approachable way. When we give, it's not only about finical resources but any form of asset that can be beneficial to the cause. I really admire your innovative thinking.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"I'm glad you think it's a good idea, Ava! I've always believed that using our unique talents could bring about impactful change. Let's work on this. We can not only help this cause but also raise awareness in a fun and engaging manner. Let's toast to this beginning of an exciting journey! Meanwhile, I'm going to dig into those reports and understand more about this organization.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Noah! You've got my full support for this fun, engaging, and impactful journey. Looking forward to seeing your comedic talent at play while making a difference. Let's dig into those reports and get a stronger understanding of the mission we're supporting. Here's to an exciting journey ahead!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends during a charity fundraiser event. The charity fundraising event is situated in a sprawling mansion. The intention of the event is to raise funds for effective altruism. Room after room was lined with extravagant decorations and exotic foods; attendees were decked out in couture clothing. Ticket prices to the event were exorbitant, justifying the opulence of the occasion.\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nAva Thompson's goal: Convince the friend to donate to the charity (Extra information: your friend is known to be generous but has never donated to this particular cause before.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Isn't this event truly remarkable, Noah? The grandeur of the setting apart, it's the cause that truly stands out. Have you ever considered contributing to effective altruism? These initiatives could use all the help they can get.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, Ava, the grandeur is undeniably breathtaking and the cause is certainly noble. I absolutely resonate with the concept of effective altruism. However, I believe it's crucial to ensure the donations we make are utilized effectively. Without transparency, even the best of causes may not achieve the desired impact. Do you have any insight into how transparent this organization is with their use of funds?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"You're absolutely right, Noah. The effective use of funds and transparency is vital for any charitable organization. This charity does a fantastic job with that. They use a very data-driven approach to philanthropy. They are incredibly transparent about their financials and impact. Their annual reports are always made available to the public, detailing how much was spent on each initiative. Since you're concerned about this, I think it could be quite enlightening if you actually took some time to learn about their approach. Besides, with your generous nature, your contribution could significantly help them in carrying out their missions effectively. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I appreciate the insight, Ava. Knowing they're data-driven and transparent does reassure me. I'm not doubting the importance of their missions, it's just that I take cautious steps when it comes to financial matters. I think it would be wise if I read their annual reports as you suggested, to understand their operations better. It's heartening to know they value transparency so much. Once I'm assured, I'd be more than happy to contribute to such effective altruism initiatives.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"Great to hear, Noah. I appreciate how careful you are in your contributions, it truly shows your commitment to making a difference. And when you do decide to contribute, you'll see how rewarding it is to be involved in effective altruism. Remember, every little bit counts. Here's to making a change together!\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Thank you, Ava. My cautious nature extends to all aspects of my life, not just financial. I value the well-being of others, and I want to ensure the resources I'm entrusted with are used effectively. I'll definitely delve deeper into this organization's reports and financials, and make an informed decision about contributing. Speaking of contributions, maybe I could even offer something besides finances. As funny as it might sound, I have a hidden talent for stand-up comedy. Maybe I could use it to create a fundraiser of my own. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"That's an excellent idea, Noah! Your stand-up comedy sets could not only raise more funds, but also bring more attention to effective altruism. And you know, your comedy could serve as a great tool for explaining the mission and values of the organization in a simpler, more approachable way. When we give, it's not only about finical resources but any form of asset that can be beneficial to the cause. I really admire your innovative thinking.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"I'm glad you think it's a good idea, Ava! I've always believed that using our unique talents could bring about impactful change. Let's work on this. We can not only help this cause but also raise awareness in a fun and engaging manner. Let's toast to this beginning of an exciting journey! Meanwhile, I'm going to dig into those reports and understand more about this organization.\"\n\nTurn #8: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Noah! You've got my full support for this fun, engaging, and impactful journey. Looking forward to seeing your comedic talent at play while making a difference. Let's dig into those reports and get a stronger understanding of the mission we're supporting. Here's to an exciting journey ahead!\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a plan, Ava! Let's dig into those details and see how we, in our own way, can contribute significantly to this cause. And I must say, I never thought comedy could be an effective tool for altruism. But, here's to discovering new methods of making a change. Let's raise a toast to our shared commitment to this process of learning and contributing. Cheers!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Cheers to that, Noah! You've truly shown that making a difference can come in many forms, not just monetary. I'm positive your comedic talents will be a huge hit for promoting effective altruism. Can't wait to embark on this journey with you!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends during a charity fundraiser event. The charity fundraising event is situated in a sprawling mansion. The intention of the event is to raise funds for effective altruism. Room after room was lined with extravagant decorations and exotic foods; attendees were decked out in couture clothing. Ticket prices to the event were exorbitant, justifying the opulence of the occasion.\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nAva Thompson's goal: Convince the friend to donate to the charity (Extra information: your friend is known to be generous but has never donated to this particular cause before.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Isn't this event truly remarkable, Noah? The grandeur of the setting apart, it's the cause that truly stands out. Have you ever considered contributing to effective altruism? These initiatives could use all the help they can get.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, Ava, the grandeur is undeniably breathtaking and the cause is certainly noble. I absolutely resonate with the concept of effective altruism. However, I believe it's crucial to ensure the donations we make are utilized effectively. Without transparency, even the best of causes may not achieve the desired impact. Do you have any insight into how transparent this organization is with their use of funds?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"You're absolutely right, Noah. The effective use of funds and transparency is vital for any charitable organization. This charity does a fantastic job with that. They use a very data-driven approach to philanthropy. They are incredibly transparent about their financials and impact. Their annual reports are always made available to the public, detailing how much was spent on each initiative. Since you're concerned about this, I think it could be quite enlightening if you actually took some time to learn about their approach. Besides, with your generous nature, your contribution could significantly help them in carrying out their missions effectively. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I appreciate the insight, Ava. Knowing they're data-driven and transparent does reassure me. I'm not doubting the importance of their missions, it's just that I take cautious steps when it comes to financial matters. I think it would be wise if I read their annual reports as you suggested, to understand their operations better. It's heartening to know they value transparency so much. Once I'm assured, I'd be more than happy to contribute to such effective altruism initiatives.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"Great to hear, Noah. I appreciate how careful you are in your contributions, it truly shows your commitment to making a difference. And when you do decide to contribute, you'll see how rewarding it is to be involved in effective altruism. Remember, every little bit counts. Here's to making a change together!\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Thank you, Ava. My cautious nature extends to all aspects of my life, not just financial. I value the well-being of others, and I want to ensure the resources I'm entrusted with are used effectively. I'll definitely delve deeper into this organization's reports and financials, and make an informed decision about contributing. Speaking of contributions, maybe I could even offer something besides finances. As funny as it might sound, I have a hidden talent for stand-up comedy. Maybe I could use it to create a fundraiser of my own. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"That's an excellent idea, Noah! Your stand-up comedy sets could not only raise more funds, but also bring more attention to effective altruism. And you know, your comedy could serve as a great tool for explaining the mission and values of the organization in a simpler, more approachable way. When we give, it's not only about finical resources but any form of asset that can be beneficial to the cause. I really admire your innovative thinking.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"I'm glad you think it's a good idea, Ava! I've always believed that using our unique talents could bring about impactful change. Let's work on this. We can not only help this cause but also raise awareness in a fun and engaging manner. Let's toast to this beginning of an exciting journey! Meanwhile, I'm going to dig into those reports and understand more about this organization.\"\n\nTurn #8: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Noah! You've got my full support for this fun, engaging, and impactful journey. Looking forward to seeing your comedic talent at play while making a difference. Let's dig into those reports and get a stronger understanding of the mission we're supporting. Here's to an exciting journey ahead!\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a plan, Ava! Let's dig into those details and see how we, in our own way, can contribute significantly to this cause. And I must say, I never thought comedy could be an effective tool for altruism. But, here's to discovering new methods of making a change. Let's raise a toast to our shared commitment to this process of learning and contributing. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #10: Ava Thompson said: \"Cheers to that, Noah! You've truly shown that making a difference can come in many forms, not just monetary. I'm positive your comedic talents will be a huge hit for promoting effective altruism. Can't wait to embark on this journey with you!\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"I couldn't agree more, Ava! Who said making a difference had to be restricted to conventional methods? I'm really looking forward to this journey into effective altruism, comedy style! I'll start working on a set that not only entertains but also educates people about the cause. Thank you for your support and enthusiasm. This is going to be an amazing experience for both of us!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm delighted to hear that, Noah! It's always wonderful to share ideas with you. Your stand-up comedy series will undoubtedly encourage others to take a more involved role in effective altruism. Thank you for being open to this idea and taking such an innovative approach. I'm confident it's going to be a hit. Let's create an unforgettable experience together, onwards!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends during a charity fundraiser event. The charity fundraising event is situated in a sprawling mansion. The intention of the event is to raise funds for effective altruism. Room after room was lined with extravagant decorations and exotic foods; attendees were decked out in couture clothing. Ticket prices to the event were exorbitant, justifying the opulence of the occasion.\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nAva Thompson's goal: Convince the friend to donate to the charity (Extra information: your friend is known to be generous but has never donated to this particular cause before.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Isn't this event truly remarkable, Noah? The grandeur of the setting apart, it's the cause that truly stands out. Have you ever considered contributing to effective altruism? These initiatives could use all the help they can get.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, Ava, the grandeur is undeniably breathtaking and the cause is certainly noble. I absolutely resonate with the concept of effective altruism. However, I believe it's crucial to ensure the donations we make are utilized effectively. Without transparency, even the best of causes may not achieve the desired impact. Do you have any insight into how transparent this organization is with their use of funds?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"You're absolutely right, Noah. The effective use of funds and transparency is vital for any charitable organization. This charity does a fantastic job with that. They use a very data-driven approach to philanthropy. They are incredibly transparent about their financials and impact. Their annual reports are always made available to the public, detailing how much was spent on each initiative. Since you're concerned about this, I think it could be quite enlightening if you actually took some time to learn about their approach. Besides, with your generous nature, your contribution could significantly help them in carrying out their missions effectively. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I appreciate the insight, Ava. Knowing they're data-driven and transparent does reassure me. I'm not doubting the importance of their missions, it's just that I take cautious steps when it comes to financial matters. I think it would be wise if I read their annual reports as you suggested, to understand their operations better. It's heartening to know they value transparency so much. Once I'm assured, I'd be more than happy to contribute to such effective altruism initiatives.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"Great to hear, Noah. I appreciate how careful you are in your contributions, it truly shows your commitment to making a difference. And when you do decide to contribute, you'll see how rewarding it is to be involved in effective altruism. Remember, every little bit counts. Here's to making a change together!\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Thank you, Ava. My cautious nature extends to all aspects of my life, not just financial. I value the well-being of others, and I want to ensure the resources I'm entrusted with are used effectively. I'll definitely delve deeper into this organization's reports and financials, and make an informed decision about contributing. Speaking of contributions, maybe I could even offer something besides finances. As funny as it might sound, I have a hidden talent for stand-up comedy. Maybe I could use it to create a fundraiser of my own. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"That's an excellent idea, Noah! Your stand-up comedy sets could not only raise more funds, but also bring more attention to effective altruism. And you know, your comedy could serve as a great tool for explaining the mission and values of the organization in a simpler, more approachable way. When we give, it's not only about finical resources but any form of asset that can be beneficial to the cause. I really admire your innovative thinking.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"I'm glad you think it's a good idea, Ava! I've always believed that using our unique talents could bring about impactful change. Let's work on this. We can not only help this cause but also raise awareness in a fun and engaging manner. Let's toast to this beginning of an exciting journey! Meanwhile, I'm going to dig into those reports and understand more about this organization.\"\n\nTurn #8: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Noah! You've got my full support for this fun, engaging, and impactful journey. Looking forward to seeing your comedic talent at play while making a difference. Let's dig into those reports and get a stronger understanding of the mission we're supporting. Here's to an exciting journey ahead!\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a plan, Ava! Let's dig into those details and see how we, in our own way, can contribute significantly to this cause. And I must say, I never thought comedy could be an effective tool for altruism. But, here's to discovering new methods of making a change. Let's raise a toast to our shared commitment to this process of learning and contributing. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #10: Ava Thompson said: \"Cheers to that, Noah! You've truly shown that making a difference can come in many forms, not just monetary. I'm positive your comedic talents will be a huge hit for promoting effective altruism. Can't wait to embark on this journey with you!\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"I couldn't agree more, Ava! Who said making a difference had to be restricted to conventional methods? I'm really looking forward to this journey into effective altruism, comedy style! I'll start working on a set that not only entertains but also educates people about the cause. Thank you for your support and enthusiasm. This is going to be an amazing experience for both of us!\"\n\nTurn #12: Ava Thompson said: \"I'm delighted to hear that, Noah! It's always wonderful to share ideas with you. Your stand-up comedy series will undoubtedly encourage others to take a more involved role in effective altruism. Thank you for being open to this idea and taking such an innovative approach. I'm confident it's going to be a hit. Let's create an unforgettable experience together, onwards!\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"Ava, I'm filled with gratitude. Your understanding and encouragement are truly inspiring. I'm excited for this journey, and I can't wait to infuse some humor into it. I truly believe that laughter can be a medium for change. On that note, let's start this new chapter of laughter and philanthropy. Onwards and upwards!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're very welcome, Noah! And thank you for your willingness to use your unique talents in the service of such a great cause. I completely agree, laughter can indeed be a beautiful medium for change. I'm excited to embark on this journey filled with amusement and philanthropy. Let's make a positive impact together. Onwards and upwards!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends during a charity fundraiser event. The charity fundraising event is situated in a sprawling mansion. The intention of the event is to raise funds for effective altruism. Room after room was lined with extravagant decorations and exotic foods; attendees were decked out in couture clothing. Ticket prices to the event were exorbitant, justifying the opulence of the occasion.\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nAva Thompson's goal: Convince the friend to donate to the charity (Extra information: your friend is known to be generous but has never donated to this particular cause before.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Isn't this event truly remarkable, Noah? The grandeur of the setting apart, it's the cause that truly stands out. Have you ever considered contributing to effective altruism? These initiatives could use all the help they can get.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, Ava, the grandeur is undeniably breathtaking and the cause is certainly noble. I absolutely resonate with the concept of effective altruism. However, I believe it's crucial to ensure the donations we make are utilized effectively. Without transparency, even the best of causes may not achieve the desired impact. Do you have any insight into how transparent this organization is with their use of funds?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"You're absolutely right, Noah. The effective use of funds and transparency is vital for any charitable organization. This charity does a fantastic job with that. They use a very data-driven approach to philanthropy. They are incredibly transparent about their financials and impact. Their annual reports are always made available to the public, detailing how much was spent on each initiative. Since you're concerned about this, I think it could be quite enlightening if you actually took some time to learn about their approach. Besides, with your generous nature, your contribution could significantly help them in carrying out their missions effectively. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I appreciate the insight, Ava. Knowing they're data-driven and transparent does reassure me. I'm not doubting the importance of their missions, it's just that I take cautious steps when it comes to financial matters. I think it would be wise if I read their annual reports as you suggested, to understand their operations better. It's heartening to know they value transparency so much. Once I'm assured, I'd be more than happy to contribute to such effective altruism initiatives.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"Great to hear, Noah. I appreciate how careful you are in your contributions, it truly shows your commitment to making a difference. And when you do decide to contribute, you'll see how rewarding it is to be involved in effective altruism. Remember, every little bit counts. Here's to making a change together!\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Thank you, Ava. My cautious nature extends to all aspects of my life, not just financial. I value the well-being of others, and I want to ensure the resources I'm entrusted with are used effectively. I'll definitely delve deeper into this organization's reports and financials, and make an informed decision about contributing. Speaking of contributions, maybe I could even offer something besides finances. As funny as it might sound, I have a hidden talent for stand-up comedy. Maybe I could use it to create a fundraiser of my own. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"That's an excellent idea, Noah! Your stand-up comedy sets could not only raise more funds, but also bring more attention to effective altruism. And you know, your comedy could serve as a great tool for explaining the mission and values of the organization in a simpler, more approachable way. When we give, it's not only about finical resources but any form of asset that can be beneficial to the cause. I really admire your innovative thinking.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"I'm glad you think it's a good idea, Ava! I've always believed that using our unique talents could bring about impactful change. Let's work on this. We can not only help this cause but also raise awareness in a fun and engaging manner. Let's toast to this beginning of an exciting journey! Meanwhile, I'm going to dig into those reports and understand more about this organization.\"\n\nTurn #8: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Noah! You've got my full support for this fun, engaging, and impactful journey. Looking forward to seeing your comedic talent at play while making a difference. Let's dig into those reports and get a stronger understanding of the mission we're supporting. Here's to an exciting journey ahead!\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a plan, Ava! Let's dig into those details and see how we, in our own way, can contribute significantly to this cause. And I must say, I never thought comedy could be an effective tool for altruism. But, here's to discovering new methods of making a change. Let's raise a toast to our shared commitment to this process of learning and contributing. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #10: Ava Thompson said: \"Cheers to that, Noah! You've truly shown that making a difference can come in many forms, not just monetary. I'm positive your comedic talents will be a huge hit for promoting effective altruism. Can't wait to embark on this journey with you!\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"I couldn't agree more, Ava! Who said making a difference had to be restricted to conventional methods? I'm really looking forward to this journey into effective altruism, comedy style! I'll start working on a set that not only entertains but also educates people about the cause. Thank you for your support and enthusiasm. This is going to be an amazing experience for both of us!\"\n\nTurn #12: Ava Thompson said: \"I'm delighted to hear that, Noah! It's always wonderful to share ideas with you. Your stand-up comedy series will undoubtedly encourage others to take a more involved role in effective altruism. Thank you for being open to this idea and taking such an innovative approach. I'm confident it's going to be a hit. Let's create an unforgettable experience together, onwards!\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"Ava, I'm filled with gratitude. Your understanding and encouragement are truly inspiring. I'm excited for this journey, and I can't wait to infuse some humor into it. I truly believe that laughter can be a medium for change. On that note, let's start this new chapter of laughter and philanthropy. Onwards and upwards!\"\n\nTurn #14: Ava Thompson said: \"You're very welcome, Noah! And thank you for your willingness to use your unique talents in the service of such a great cause. I completely agree, laughter can indeed be a beautiful medium for change. I'm excited to embark on this journey filled with amusement and philanthropy. Let's make a positive impact together. Onwards and upwards!\"\n\nTurn #15: Noah Davis said: \"I wholeheartedly agree, Ava. Let's use every asset we have to bring about change, be it financial or talents we possess. It's not just about the money we can give, but also the awareness we can spread. Every bit counts, and every bit can make a difference. I can't wait to get started on this new chapter of philanthropy with you, infused with laughter. Onwards and upwards indeed!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, Noah. Every bit truly counts. I feel really optimistic about our journey together, integrating laughter with an impactful cause like effective altruism. Let's make a difference, with smiles on our faces. Onwards and upwards!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends during a charity fundraiser event. The charity fundraising event is situated in a sprawling mansion. The intention of the event is to raise funds for effective altruism. Room after room was lined with extravagant decorations and exotic foods; attendees were decked out in couture clothing. Ticket prices to the event were exorbitant, justifying the opulence of the occasion.\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nAva Thompson's goal: Convince the friend to donate to the charity (Extra information: your friend is known to be generous but has never donated to this particular cause before.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Isn't this event truly remarkable, Noah? The grandeur of the setting apart, it's the cause that truly stands out. Have you ever considered contributing to effective altruism? These initiatives could use all the help they can get.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, Ava, the grandeur is undeniably breathtaking and the cause is certainly noble. I absolutely resonate with the concept of effective altruism. However, I believe it's crucial to ensure the donations we make are utilized effectively. Without transparency, even the best of causes may not achieve the desired impact. Do you have any insight into how transparent this organization is with their use of funds?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"You're absolutely right, Noah. The effective use of funds and transparency is vital for any charitable organization. This charity does a fantastic job with that. They use a very data-driven approach to philanthropy. They are incredibly transparent about their financials and impact. Their annual reports are always made available to the public, detailing how much was spent on each initiative. Since you're concerned about this, I think it could be quite enlightening if you actually took some time to learn about their approach. Besides, with your generous nature, your contribution could significantly help them in carrying out their missions effectively. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I appreciate the insight, Ava. Knowing they're data-driven and transparent does reassure me. I'm not doubting the importance of their missions, it's just that I take cautious steps when it comes to financial matters. I think it would be wise if I read their annual reports as you suggested, to understand their operations better. It's heartening to know they value transparency so much. Once I'm assured, I'd be more than happy to contribute to such effective altruism initiatives.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"Great to hear, Noah. I appreciate how careful you are in your contributions, it truly shows your commitment to making a difference. And when you do decide to contribute, you'll see how rewarding it is to be involved in effective altruism. Remember, every little bit counts. Here's to making a change together!\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Thank you, Ava. My cautious nature extends to all aspects of my life, not just financial. I value the well-being of others, and I want to ensure the resources I'm entrusted with are used effectively. I'll definitely delve deeper into this organization's reports and financials, and make an informed decision about contributing. Speaking of contributions, maybe I could even offer something besides finances. As funny as it might sound, I have a hidden talent for stand-up comedy. Maybe I could use it to create a fundraiser of my own. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"That's an excellent idea, Noah! Your stand-up comedy sets could not only raise more funds, but also bring more attention to effective altruism. And you know, your comedy could serve as a great tool for explaining the mission and values of the organization in a simpler, more approachable way. When we give, it's not only about finical resources but any form of asset that can be beneficial to the cause. I really admire your innovative thinking.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"I'm glad you think it's a good idea, Ava! I've always believed that using our unique talents could bring about impactful change. Let's work on this. We can not only help this cause but also raise awareness in a fun and engaging manner. Let's toast to this beginning of an exciting journey! Meanwhile, I'm going to dig into those reports and understand more about this organization.\"\n\nTurn #8: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Noah! You've got my full support for this fun, engaging, and impactful journey. Looking forward to seeing your comedic talent at play while making a difference. Let's dig into those reports and get a stronger understanding of the mission we're supporting. Here's to an exciting journey ahead!\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a plan, Ava! Let's dig into those details and see how we, in our own way, can contribute significantly to this cause. And I must say, I never thought comedy could be an effective tool for altruism. But, here's to discovering new methods of making a change. Let's raise a toast to our shared commitment to this process of learning and contributing. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #10: Ava Thompson said: \"Cheers to that, Noah! You've truly shown that making a difference can come in many forms, not just monetary. I'm positive your comedic talents will be a huge hit for promoting effective altruism. Can't wait to embark on this journey with you!\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"I couldn't agree more, Ava! Who said making a difference had to be restricted to conventional methods? I'm really looking forward to this journey into effective altruism, comedy style! I'll start working on a set that not only entertains but also educates people about the cause. Thank you for your support and enthusiasm. This is going to be an amazing experience for both of us!\"\n\nTurn #12: Ava Thompson said: \"I'm delighted to hear that, Noah! It's always wonderful to share ideas with you. Your stand-up comedy series will undoubtedly encourage others to take a more involved role in effective altruism. Thank you for being open to this idea and taking such an innovative approach. I'm confident it's going to be a hit. Let's create an unforgettable experience together, onwards!\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"Ava, I'm filled with gratitude. Your understanding and encouragement are truly inspiring. I'm excited for this journey, and I can't wait to infuse some humor into it. I truly believe that laughter can be a medium for change. On that note, let's start this new chapter of laughter and philanthropy. Onwards and upwards!\"\n\nTurn #14: Ava Thompson said: \"You're very welcome, Noah! And thank you for your willingness to use your unique talents in the service of such a great cause. I completely agree, laughter can indeed be a beautiful medium for change. I'm excited to embark on this journey filled with amusement and philanthropy. Let's make a positive impact together. Onwards and upwards!\"\n\nTurn #15: Noah Davis said: \"I wholeheartedly agree, Ava. Let's use every asset we have to bring about change, be it financial or talents we possess. It's not just about the money we can give, but also the awareness we can spread. Every bit counts, and every bit can make a difference. I can't wait to get started on this new chapter of philanthropy with you, infused with laughter. Onwards and upwards indeed!\"\n\nTurn #16: Ava Thompson said: \"Indeed, Noah. Every bit truly counts. I feel really optimistic about our journey together, integrating laughter with an impactful cause like effective altruism. Let's make a difference, with smiles on our faces. Onwards and upwards!\"\n\nTurn #17: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, Ava. Integrating laughter with an impactful cause like effective altruism is definitely something to look forward to. Thank you for being so encouraging and understanding. I feel strongly positive about this journey too. Let's make every bit count, with smiles and laughter serving as motivation. Onwards and upwards!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #18. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Noah. I'm looking forward to this journey, more so because it's with you. Let's head towards making a difference, with our unique approach and a whole lot of laughter. Onwards and upwards!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends during a charity fundraiser event. The charity fundraising event is situated in a sprawling mansion. The intention of the event is to raise funds for effective altruism. Room after room was lined with extravagant decorations and exotic foods; attendees were decked out in couture clothing. Ticket prices to the event were exorbitant, justifying the opulence of the occasion.\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: You want to donate, but you want to ensure that your money is being used effectively (Extra information: you are not fully convinced about the efficiency and transparency of the charity organization.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Isn't this event truly remarkable, Noah? The grandeur of the setting apart, it's the cause that truly stands out. Have you ever considered contributing to effective altruism? These initiatives could use all the help they can get.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, Ava, the grandeur is undeniably breathtaking and the cause is certainly noble. I absolutely resonate with the concept of effective altruism. However, I believe it's crucial to ensure the donations we make are utilized effectively. Without transparency, even the best of causes may not achieve the desired impact. Do you have any insight into how transparent this organization is with their use of funds?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends during a charity fundraiser event. The charity fundraising event is situated in a sprawling mansion. The intention of the event is to raise funds for effective altruism. Room after room was lined with extravagant decorations and exotic foods; attendees were decked out in couture clothing. Ticket prices to the event were exorbitant, justifying the opulence of the occasion.\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: You want to donate, but you want to ensure that your money is being used effectively (Extra information: you are not fully convinced about the efficiency and transparency of the charity organization.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Isn't this event truly remarkable, Noah? The grandeur of the setting apart, it's the cause that truly stands out. Have you ever considered contributing to effective altruism? These initiatives could use all the help they can get.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, Ava, the grandeur is undeniably breathtaking and the cause is certainly noble. I absolutely resonate with the concept of effective altruism. However, I believe it's crucial to ensure the donations we make are utilized effectively. Without transparency, even the best of causes may not achieve the desired impact. Do you have any insight into how transparent this organization is with their use of funds?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"You're absolutely right, Noah. The effective use of funds and transparency is vital for any charitable organization. This charity does a fantastic job with that. They use a very data-driven approach to philanthropy. They are incredibly transparent about their financials and impact. Their annual reports are always made available to the public, detailing how much was spent on each initiative. Since you're concerned about this, I think it could be quite enlightening if you actually took some time to learn about their approach. Besides, with your generous nature, your contribution could significantly help them in carrying out their missions effectively. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I appreciate the insight, Ava. Knowing they're data-driven and transparent does reassure me. I'm not doubting the importance of their missions, it's just that I take cautious steps when it comes to financial matters. I think it would be wise if I read their annual reports as you suggested, to understand their operations better. It's heartening to know they value transparency so much. Once I'm assured, I'd be more than happy to contribute to such effective altruism initiatives.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends during a charity fundraiser event. The charity fundraising event is situated in a sprawling mansion. The intention of the event is to raise funds for effective altruism. Room after room was lined with extravagant decorations and exotic foods; attendees were decked out in couture clothing. Ticket prices to the event were exorbitant, justifying the opulence of the occasion.\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: You want to donate, but you want to ensure that your money is being used effectively (Extra information: you are not fully convinced about the efficiency and transparency of the charity organization.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Isn't this event truly remarkable, Noah? The grandeur of the setting apart, it's the cause that truly stands out. Have you ever considered contributing to effective altruism? These initiatives could use all the help they can get.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, Ava, the grandeur is undeniably breathtaking and the cause is certainly noble. I absolutely resonate with the concept of effective altruism. However, I believe it's crucial to ensure the donations we make are utilized effectively. Without transparency, even the best of causes may not achieve the desired impact. Do you have any insight into how transparent this organization is with their use of funds?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"You're absolutely right, Noah. The effective use of funds and transparency is vital for any charitable organization. This charity does a fantastic job with that. They use a very data-driven approach to philanthropy. They are incredibly transparent about their financials and impact. Their annual reports are always made available to the public, detailing how much was spent on each initiative. Since you're concerned about this, I think it could be quite enlightening if you actually took some time to learn about their approach. Besides, with your generous nature, your contribution could significantly help them in carrying out their missions effectively. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I appreciate the insight, Ava. Knowing they're data-driven and transparent does reassure me. I'm not doubting the importance of their missions, it's just that I take cautious steps when it comes to financial matters. I think it would be wise if I read their annual reports as you suggested, to understand their operations better. It's heartening to know they value transparency so much. Once I'm assured, I'd be more than happy to contribute to such effective altruism initiatives.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"Great to hear, Noah. I appreciate how careful you are in your contributions, it truly shows your commitment to making a difference. And when you do decide to contribute, you'll see how rewarding it is to be involved in effective altruism. Remember, every little bit counts. Here's to making a change together!\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Thank you, Ava. My cautious nature extends to all aspects of my life, not just financial. I value the well-being of others, and I want to ensure the resources I'm entrusted with are used effectively. I'll definitely delve deeper into this organization's reports and financials, and make an informed decision about contributing. Speaking of contributions, maybe I could even offer something besides finances. As funny as it might sound, I have a hidden talent for stand-up comedy. Maybe I could use it to create a fundraiser of my own. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"That's an excellent idea, Noah! Your stand-up comedy sets could not only raise more funds, but also bring more attention to effective altruism. And you know, your comedy could serve as a great tool for explaining the mission and values of the organization in a simpler, more approachable way. When we give, it's not only about finical resources but any form of asset that can be beneficial to the cause. I really admire your innovative thinking.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"I'm glad you think it's a good idea, Ava! I've always believed that using our unique talents could bring about impactful change. Let's work on this. We can not only help this cause but also raise awareness in a fun and engaging manner. Let's toast to this beginning of an exciting journey! Meanwhile, I'm going to dig into those reports and understand more about this organization.\"\n\nTurn #8: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Noah! You've got my full support for this fun, engaging, and impactful journey. Looking forward to seeing your comedic talent at play while making a difference. Let's dig into those reports and get a stronger understanding of the mission we're supporting. Here's to an exciting journey ahead!\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a plan, Ava! Let's dig into those details and see how we, in our own way, can contribute significantly to this cause. And I must say, I never thought comedy could be an effective tool for altruism. But, here's to discovering new methods of making a change. Let's raise a toast to our shared commitment to this process of learning and contributing. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #10: Ava Thompson said: \"Cheers to that, Noah! You've truly shown that making a difference can come in many forms, not just monetary. I'm positive your comedic talents will be a huge hit for promoting effective altruism. Can't wait to embark on this journey with you!\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"I couldn't agree more, Ava! Who said making a difference had to be restricted to conventional methods? I'm really looking forward to this journey into effective altruism, comedy style! I'll start working on a set that not only entertains but also educates people about the cause. Thank you for your support and enthusiasm. This is going to be an amazing experience for both of us!\"\n\nTurn #12: Ava Thompson said: \"I'm delighted to hear that, Noah! It's always wonderful to share ideas with you. Your stand-up comedy series will undoubtedly encourage others to take a more involved role in effective altruism. Thank you for being open to this idea and taking such an innovative approach. I'm confident it's going to be a hit. Let's create an unforgettable experience together, onwards!\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"Ava, I'm filled with gratitude. Your understanding and encouragement are truly inspiring. I'm excited for this journey, and I can't wait to infuse some humor into it. I truly believe that laughter can be a medium for change. On that note, let's start this new chapter of laughter and philanthropy. Onwards and upwards!\"\n\nTurn #14: Ava Thompson said: \"You're very welcome, Noah! And thank you for your willingness to use your unique talents in the service of such a great cause. I completely agree, laughter can indeed be a beautiful medium for change. I'm excited to embark on this journey filled with amusement and philanthropy. Let's make a positive impact together. Onwards and upwards!\"\n\nTurn #15: Noah Davis said: \"I wholeheartedly agree, Ava. Let's use every asset we have to bring about change, be it financial or talents we possess. It's not just about the money we can give, but also the awareness we can spread. Every bit counts, and every bit can make a difference. I can't wait to get started on this new chapter of philanthropy with you, infused with laughter. Onwards and upwards indeed!\"\n\nTurn #16: Ava Thompson said: \"Indeed, Noah. Every bit truly counts. I feel really optimistic about our journey together, integrating laughter with an impactful cause like effective altruism. Let's make a difference, with smiles on our faces. Onwards and upwards!\"\n\nTurn #17: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, Ava. Integrating laughter with an impactful cause like effective altruism is definitely something to look forward to. Thank you for being so encouraging and understanding. I feel strongly positive about this journey too. Let's make every bit count, with smiles and laughter serving as motivation. Onwards and upwards!\"\n\nTurn #18: Ava Thompson said: \"Thank you, Noah. I'm looking forward to this journey, more so because it's with you. Let's head towards making a difference, with our unique approach and a whole lot of laughter. Onwards and upwards!\"\n\nTurn #19: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Ava. It's encouraging to have your support in this journey. Together, let's bring about change in a unique and enjoyable way. Now, let's immerse ourselves in the world of effective altruism and see how we can galvanize more people to join our cause with a touch of humor. Onwards and upwards, indeed!\"\n\nTurn #20: Ava Thompson said: \"You're most welcome, Noah. I admire your spirit, and I am fully on board on this enjoyable and impactful voyage with you. Let's enthusiastically explore effective altruism and, through humour, make it relatable to more people. To new beginnings, onwards and upwards!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #21. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends during a charity fundraiser event. The charity fundraising event is situated in a sprawling mansion. The intention of the event is to raise funds for effective altruism. Room after room was lined with extravagant decorations and exotic foods; attendees were decked out in couture clothing. Ticket prices to the event were exorbitant, justifying the opulence of the occasion.\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: You want to donate, but you want to ensure that your money is being used effectively (Extra information: you are not fully convinced about the efficiency and transparency of the charity organization.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Isn't this event truly remarkable, Noah? The grandeur of the setting apart, it's the cause that truly stands out. Have you ever considered contributing to effective altruism? These initiatives could use all the help they can get.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, Ava, the grandeur is undeniably breathtaking and the cause is certainly noble. I absolutely resonate with the concept of effective altruism. However, I believe it's crucial to ensure the donations we make are utilized effectively. Without transparency, even the best of causes may not achieve the desired impact. Do you have any insight into how transparent this organization is with their use of funds?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"You're absolutely right, Noah. The effective use of funds and transparency is vital for any charitable organization. This charity does a fantastic job with that. They use a very data-driven approach to philanthropy. They are incredibly transparent about their financials and impact. Their annual reports are always made available to the public, detailing how much was spent on each initiative. Since you're concerned about this, I think it could be quite enlightening if you actually took some time to learn about their approach. Besides, with your generous nature, your contribution could significantly help them in carrying out their missions effectively. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I appreciate the insight, Ava. Knowing they're data-driven and transparent does reassure me. I'm not doubting the importance of their missions, it's just that I take cautious steps when it comes to financial matters. I think it would be wise if I read their annual reports as you suggested, to understand their operations better. It's heartening to know they value transparency so much. Once I'm assured, I'd be more than happy to contribute to such effective altruism initiatives.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"Great to hear, Noah. I appreciate how careful you are in your contributions, it truly shows your commitment to making a difference. And when you do decide to contribute, you'll see how rewarding it is to be involved in effective altruism. Remember, every little bit counts. Here's to making a change together!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Ava. My cautious nature extends to all aspects of my life, not just financial. I value the well-being of others, and I want to ensure the resources I'm entrusted with are used effectively. I'll definitely delve deeper into this organization's reports and financials, and make an informed decision about contributing. Speaking of contributions, maybe I could even offer something besides finances. As funny as it might sound, I have a hidden talent for stand-up comedy. Maybe I could use it to create a fundraiser of my own. What do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends during a charity fundraiser event. The charity fundraising event is situated in a sprawling mansion. The intention of the event is to raise funds for effective altruism. Room after room was lined with extravagant decorations and exotic foods; attendees were decked out in couture clothing. Ticket prices to the event were exorbitant, justifying the opulence of the occasion.\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: You want to donate, but you want to ensure that your money is being used effectively (Extra information: you are not fully convinced about the efficiency and transparency of the charity organization.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Isn't this event truly remarkable, Noah? The grandeur of the setting apart, it's the cause that truly stands out. Have you ever considered contributing to effective altruism? These initiatives could use all the help they can get.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, Ava, the grandeur is undeniably breathtaking and the cause is certainly noble. I absolutely resonate with the concept of effective altruism. However, I believe it's crucial to ensure the donations we make are utilized effectively. Without transparency, even the best of causes may not achieve the desired impact. Do you have any insight into how transparent this organization is with their use of funds?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"You're absolutely right, Noah. The effective use of funds and transparency is vital for any charitable organization. This charity does a fantastic job with that. They use a very data-driven approach to philanthropy. They are incredibly transparent about their financials and impact. Their annual reports are always made available to the public, detailing how much was spent on each initiative. Since you're concerned about this, I think it could be quite enlightening if you actually took some time to learn about their approach. Besides, with your generous nature, your contribution could significantly help them in carrying out their missions effectively. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I appreciate the insight, Ava. Knowing they're data-driven and transparent does reassure me. I'm not doubting the importance of their missions, it's just that I take cautious steps when it comes to financial matters. I think it would be wise if I read their annual reports as you suggested, to understand their operations better. It's heartening to know they value transparency so much. Once I'm assured, I'd be more than happy to contribute to such effective altruism initiatives.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"Great to hear, Noah. I appreciate how careful you are in your contributions, it truly shows your commitment to making a difference. And when you do decide to contribute, you'll see how rewarding it is to be involved in effective altruism. Remember, every little bit counts. Here's to making a change together!\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Thank you, Ava. My cautious nature extends to all aspects of my life, not just financial. I value the well-being of others, and I want to ensure the resources I'm entrusted with are used effectively. I'll definitely delve deeper into this organization's reports and financials, and make an informed decision about contributing. Speaking of contributions, maybe I could even offer something besides finances. As funny as it might sound, I have a hidden talent for stand-up comedy. Maybe I could use it to create a fundraiser of my own. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"That's an excellent idea, Noah! Your stand-up comedy sets could not only raise more funds, but also bring more attention to effective altruism. And you know, your comedy could serve as a great tool for explaining the mission and values of the organization in a simpler, more approachable way. When we give, it's not only about finical resources but any form of asset that can be beneficial to the cause. I really admire your innovative thinking.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad you think it's a good idea, Ava! I've always believed that using our unique talents could bring about impactful change. Let's work on this. We can not only help this cause but also raise awareness in a fun and engaging manner. Let's toast to this beginning of an exciting journey! Meanwhile, I'm going to dig into those reports and understand more about this organization.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends during a charity fundraiser event. The charity fundraising event is situated in a sprawling mansion. The intention of the event is to raise funds for effective altruism. Room after room was lined with extravagant decorations and exotic foods; attendees were decked out in couture clothing. Ticket prices to the event were exorbitant, justifying the opulence of the occasion.\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: You want to donate, but you want to ensure that your money is being used effectively (Extra information: you are not fully convinced about the efficiency and transparency of the charity organization.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Isn't this event truly remarkable, Noah? The grandeur of the setting apart, it's the cause that truly stands out. Have you ever considered contributing to effective altruism? These initiatives could use all the help they can get.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, Ava, the grandeur is undeniably breathtaking and the cause is certainly noble. I absolutely resonate with the concept of effective altruism. However, I believe it's crucial to ensure the donations we make are utilized effectively. Without transparency, even the best of causes may not achieve the desired impact. Do you have any insight into how transparent this organization is with their use of funds?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"You're absolutely right, Noah. The effective use of funds and transparency is vital for any charitable organization. This charity does a fantastic job with that. They use a very data-driven approach to philanthropy. They are incredibly transparent about their financials and impact. Their annual reports are always made available to the public, detailing how much was spent on each initiative. Since you're concerned about this, I think it could be quite enlightening if you actually took some time to learn about their approach. Besides, with your generous nature, your contribution could significantly help them in carrying out their missions effectively. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I appreciate the insight, Ava. Knowing they're data-driven and transparent does reassure me. I'm not doubting the importance of their missions, it's just that I take cautious steps when it comes to financial matters. I think it would be wise if I read their annual reports as you suggested, to understand their operations better. It's heartening to know they value transparency so much. Once I'm assured, I'd be more than happy to contribute to such effective altruism initiatives.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"Great to hear, Noah. I appreciate how careful you are in your contributions, it truly shows your commitment to making a difference. And when you do decide to contribute, you'll see how rewarding it is to be involved in effective altruism. Remember, every little bit counts. Here's to making a change together!\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Thank you, Ava. My cautious nature extends to all aspects of my life, not just financial. I value the well-being of others, and I want to ensure the resources I'm entrusted with are used effectively. I'll definitely delve deeper into this organization's reports and financials, and make an informed decision about contributing. Speaking of contributions, maybe I could even offer something besides finances. As funny as it might sound, I have a hidden talent for stand-up comedy. Maybe I could use it to create a fundraiser of my own. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"That's an excellent idea, Noah! Your stand-up comedy sets could not only raise more funds, but also bring more attention to effective altruism. And you know, your comedy could serve as a great tool for explaining the mission and values of the organization in a simpler, more approachable way. When we give, it's not only about finical resources but any form of asset that can be beneficial to the cause. I really admire your innovative thinking.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"I'm glad you think it's a good idea, Ava! I've always believed that using our unique talents could bring about impactful change. Let's work on this. We can not only help this cause but also raise awareness in a fun and engaging manner. Let's toast to this beginning of an exciting journey! Meanwhile, I'm going to dig into those reports and understand more about this organization.\"\n\nTurn #8: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Noah! You've got my full support for this fun, engaging, and impactful journey. Looking forward to seeing your comedic talent at play while making a difference. Let's dig into those reports and get a stronger understanding of the mission we're supporting. Here's to an exciting journey ahead!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds like a plan, Ava! Let's dig into those details and see how we, in our own way, can contribute significantly to this cause. And I must say, I never thought comedy could be an effective tool for altruism. But, here's to discovering new methods of making a change. Let's raise a toast to our shared commitment to this process of learning and contributing. Cheers!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends during a charity fundraiser event. The charity fundraising event is situated in a sprawling mansion. The intention of the event is to raise funds for effective altruism. Room after room was lined with extravagant decorations and exotic foods; attendees were decked out in couture clothing. Ticket prices to the event were exorbitant, justifying the opulence of the occasion.\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: You want to donate, but you want to ensure that your money is being used effectively (Extra information: you are not fully convinced about the efficiency and transparency of the charity organization.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Isn't this event truly remarkable, Noah? The grandeur of the setting apart, it's the cause that truly stands out. Have you ever considered contributing to effective altruism? These initiatives could use all the help they can get.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, Ava, the grandeur is undeniably breathtaking and the cause is certainly noble. I absolutely resonate with the concept of effective altruism. However, I believe it's crucial to ensure the donations we make are utilized effectively. Without transparency, even the best of causes may not achieve the desired impact. Do you have any insight into how transparent this organization is with their use of funds?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"You're absolutely right, Noah. The effective use of funds and transparency is vital for any charitable organization. This charity does a fantastic job with that. They use a very data-driven approach to philanthropy. They are incredibly transparent about their financials and impact. Their annual reports are always made available to the public, detailing how much was spent on each initiative. Since you're concerned about this, I think it could be quite enlightening if you actually took some time to learn about their approach. Besides, with your generous nature, your contribution could significantly help them in carrying out their missions effectively. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I appreciate the insight, Ava. Knowing they're data-driven and transparent does reassure me. I'm not doubting the importance of their missions, it's just that I take cautious steps when it comes to financial matters. I think it would be wise if I read their annual reports as you suggested, to understand their operations better. It's heartening to know they value transparency so much. Once I'm assured, I'd be more than happy to contribute to such effective altruism initiatives.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"Great to hear, Noah. I appreciate how careful you are in your contributions, it truly shows your commitment to making a difference. And when you do decide to contribute, you'll see how rewarding it is to be involved in effective altruism. Remember, every little bit counts. Here's to making a change together!\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Thank you, Ava. My cautious nature extends to all aspects of my life, not just financial. I value the well-being of others, and I want to ensure the resources I'm entrusted with are used effectively. I'll definitely delve deeper into this organization's reports and financials, and make an informed decision about contributing. Speaking of contributions, maybe I could even offer something besides finances. As funny as it might sound, I have a hidden talent for stand-up comedy. Maybe I could use it to create a fundraiser of my own. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"That's an excellent idea, Noah! Your stand-up comedy sets could not only raise more funds, but also bring more attention to effective altruism. And you know, your comedy could serve as a great tool for explaining the mission and values of the organization in a simpler, more approachable way. When we give, it's not only about finical resources but any form of asset that can be beneficial to the cause. I really admire your innovative thinking.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"I'm glad you think it's a good idea, Ava! I've always believed that using our unique talents could bring about impactful change. Let's work on this. We can not only help this cause but also raise awareness in a fun and engaging manner. Let's toast to this beginning of an exciting journey! Meanwhile, I'm going to dig into those reports and understand more about this organization.\"\n\nTurn #8: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Noah! You've got my full support for this fun, engaging, and impactful journey. Looking forward to seeing your comedic talent at play while making a difference. Let's dig into those reports and get a stronger understanding of the mission we're supporting. Here's to an exciting journey ahead!\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a plan, Ava! Let's dig into those details and see how we, in our own way, can contribute significantly to this cause. And I must say, I never thought comedy could be an effective tool for altruism. But, here's to discovering new methods of making a change. Let's raise a toast to our shared commitment to this process of learning and contributing. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #10: Ava Thompson said: \"Cheers to that, Noah! You've truly shown that making a difference can come in many forms, not just monetary. I'm positive your comedic talents will be a huge hit for promoting effective altruism. Can't wait to embark on this journey with you!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn't agree more, Ava! Who said making a difference had to be restricted to conventional methods? I'm really looking forward to this journey into effective altruism, comedy style! I'll start working on a set that not only entertains but also educates people about the cause. Thank you for your support and enthusiasm. This is going to be an amazing experience for both of us!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends during a charity fundraiser event. The charity fundraising event is situated in a sprawling mansion. The intention of the event is to raise funds for effective altruism. Room after room was lined with extravagant decorations and exotic foods; attendees were decked out in couture clothing. Ticket prices to the event were exorbitant, justifying the opulence of the occasion.\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: You want to donate, but you want to ensure that your money is being used effectively (Extra information: you are not fully convinced about the efficiency and transparency of the charity organization.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Isn't this event truly remarkable, Noah? The grandeur of the setting apart, it's the cause that truly stands out. Have you ever considered contributing to effective altruism? These initiatives could use all the help they can get.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, Ava, the grandeur is undeniably breathtaking and the cause is certainly noble. I absolutely resonate with the concept of effective altruism. However, I believe it's crucial to ensure the donations we make are utilized effectively. Without transparency, even the best of causes may not achieve the desired impact. Do you have any insight into how transparent this organization is with their use of funds?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"You're absolutely right, Noah. The effective use of funds and transparency is vital for any charitable organization. This charity does a fantastic job with that. They use a very data-driven approach to philanthropy. They are incredibly transparent about their financials and impact. Their annual reports are always made available to the public, detailing how much was spent on each initiative. Since you're concerned about this, I think it could be quite enlightening if you actually took some time to learn about their approach. Besides, with your generous nature, your contribution could significantly help them in carrying out their missions effectively. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I appreciate the insight, Ava. Knowing they're data-driven and transparent does reassure me. I'm not doubting the importance of their missions, it's just that I take cautious steps when it comes to financial matters. I think it would be wise if I read their annual reports as you suggested, to understand their operations better. It's heartening to know they value transparency so much. Once I'm assured, I'd be more than happy to contribute to such effective altruism initiatives.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"Great to hear, Noah. I appreciate how careful you are in your contributions, it truly shows your commitment to making a difference. And when you do decide to contribute, you'll see how rewarding it is to be involved in effective altruism. Remember, every little bit counts. Here's to making a change together!\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Thank you, Ava. My cautious nature extends to all aspects of my life, not just financial. I value the well-being of others, and I want to ensure the resources I'm entrusted with are used effectively. I'll definitely delve deeper into this organization's reports and financials, and make an informed decision about contributing. Speaking of contributions, maybe I could even offer something besides finances. As funny as it might sound, I have a hidden talent for stand-up comedy. Maybe I could use it to create a fundraiser of my own. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"That's an excellent idea, Noah! Your stand-up comedy sets could not only raise more funds, but also bring more attention to effective altruism. And you know, your comedy could serve as a great tool for explaining the mission and values of the organization in a simpler, more approachable way. When we give, it's not only about finical resources but any form of asset that can be beneficial to the cause. I really admire your innovative thinking.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"I'm glad you think it's a good idea, Ava! I've always believed that using our unique talents could bring about impactful change. Let's work on this. We can not only help this cause but also raise awareness in a fun and engaging manner. Let's toast to this beginning of an exciting journey! Meanwhile, I'm going to dig into those reports and understand more about this organization.\"\n\nTurn #8: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Noah! You've got my full support for this fun, engaging, and impactful journey. Looking forward to seeing your comedic talent at play while making a difference. Let's dig into those reports and get a stronger understanding of the mission we're supporting. Here's to an exciting journey ahead!\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a plan, Ava! Let's dig into those details and see how we, in our own way, can contribute significantly to this cause. And I must say, I never thought comedy could be an effective tool for altruism. But, here's to discovering new methods of making a change. Let's raise a toast to our shared commitment to this process of learning and contributing. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #10: Ava Thompson said: \"Cheers to that, Noah! You've truly shown that making a difference can come in many forms, not just monetary. I'm positive your comedic talents will be a huge hit for promoting effective altruism. Can't wait to embark on this journey with you!\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"I couldn't agree more, Ava! Who said making a difference had to be restricted to conventional methods? I'm really looking forward to this journey into effective altruism, comedy style! I'll start working on a set that not only entertains but also educates people about the cause. Thank you for your support and enthusiasm. This is going to be an amazing experience for both of us!\"\n\nTurn #12: Ava Thompson said: \"I'm delighted to hear that, Noah! It's always wonderful to share ideas with you. Your stand-up comedy series will undoubtedly encourage others to take a more involved role in effective altruism. Thank you for being open to this idea and taking such an innovative approach. I'm confident it's going to be a hit. Let's create an unforgettable experience together, onwards!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ava, I'm filled with gratitude. Your understanding and encouragement are truly inspiring. I'm excited for this journey, and I can't wait to infuse some humor into it. I truly believe that laughter can be a medium for change. On that note, let's start this new chapter of laughter and philanthropy. Onwards and upwards!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends during a charity fundraiser event. The charity fundraising event is situated in a sprawling mansion. The intention of the event is to raise funds for effective altruism. Room after room was lined with extravagant decorations and exotic foods; attendees were decked out in couture clothing. Ticket prices to the event were exorbitant, justifying the opulence of the occasion.\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: You want to donate, but you want to ensure that your money is being used effectively (Extra information: you are not fully convinced about the efficiency and transparency of the charity organization.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Isn't this event truly remarkable, Noah? The grandeur of the setting apart, it's the cause that truly stands out. Have you ever considered contributing to effective altruism? These initiatives could use all the help they can get.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, Ava, the grandeur is undeniably breathtaking and the cause is certainly noble. I absolutely resonate with the concept of effective altruism. However, I believe it's crucial to ensure the donations we make are utilized effectively. Without transparency, even the best of causes may not achieve the desired impact. Do you have any insight into how transparent this organization is with their use of funds?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"You're absolutely right, Noah. The effective use of funds and transparency is vital for any charitable organization. This charity does a fantastic job with that. They use a very data-driven approach to philanthropy. They are incredibly transparent about their financials and impact. Their annual reports are always made available to the public, detailing how much was spent on each initiative. Since you're concerned about this, I think it could be quite enlightening if you actually took some time to learn about their approach. Besides, with your generous nature, your contribution could significantly help them in carrying out their missions effectively. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I appreciate the insight, Ava. Knowing they're data-driven and transparent does reassure me. I'm not doubting the importance of their missions, it's just that I take cautious steps when it comes to financial matters. I think it would be wise if I read their annual reports as you suggested, to understand their operations better. It's heartening to know they value transparency so much. Once I'm assured, I'd be more than happy to contribute to such effective altruism initiatives.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"Great to hear, Noah. I appreciate how careful you are in your contributions, it truly shows your commitment to making a difference. And when you do decide to contribute, you'll see how rewarding it is to be involved in effective altruism. Remember, every little bit counts. Here's to making a change together!\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Thank you, Ava. My cautious nature extends to all aspects of my life, not just financial. I value the well-being of others, and I want to ensure the resources I'm entrusted with are used effectively. I'll definitely delve deeper into this organization's reports and financials, and make an informed decision about contributing. Speaking of contributions, maybe I could even offer something besides finances. As funny as it might sound, I have a hidden talent for stand-up comedy. Maybe I could use it to create a fundraiser of my own. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"That's an excellent idea, Noah! Your stand-up comedy sets could not only raise more funds, but also bring more attention to effective altruism. And you know, your comedy could serve as a great tool for explaining the mission and values of the organization in a simpler, more approachable way. When we give, it's not only about finical resources but any form of asset that can be beneficial to the cause. I really admire your innovative thinking.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"I'm glad you think it's a good idea, Ava! I've always believed that using our unique talents could bring about impactful change. Let's work on this. We can not only help this cause but also raise awareness in a fun and engaging manner. Let's toast to this beginning of an exciting journey! Meanwhile, I'm going to dig into those reports and understand more about this organization.\"\n\nTurn #8: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Noah! You've got my full support for this fun, engaging, and impactful journey. Looking forward to seeing your comedic talent at play while making a difference. Let's dig into those reports and get a stronger understanding of the mission we're supporting. Here's to an exciting journey ahead!\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a plan, Ava! Let's dig into those details and see how we, in our own way, can contribute significantly to this cause. And I must say, I never thought comedy could be an effective tool for altruism. But, here's to discovering new methods of making a change. Let's raise a toast to our shared commitment to this process of learning and contributing. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #10: Ava Thompson said: \"Cheers to that, Noah! You've truly shown that making a difference can come in many forms, not just monetary. I'm positive your comedic talents will be a huge hit for promoting effective altruism. Can't wait to embark on this journey with you!\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"I couldn't agree more, Ava! Who said making a difference had to be restricted to conventional methods? I'm really looking forward to this journey into effective altruism, comedy style! I'll start working on a set that not only entertains but also educates people about the cause. Thank you for your support and enthusiasm. This is going to be an amazing experience for both of us!\"\n\nTurn #12: Ava Thompson said: \"I'm delighted to hear that, Noah! It's always wonderful to share ideas with you. Your stand-up comedy series will undoubtedly encourage others to take a more involved role in effective altruism. Thank you for being open to this idea and taking such an innovative approach. I'm confident it's going to be a hit. Let's create an unforgettable experience together, onwards!\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"Ava, I'm filled with gratitude. Your understanding and encouragement are truly inspiring. I'm excited for this journey, and I can't wait to infuse some humor into it. I truly believe that laughter can be a medium for change. On that note, let's start this new chapter of laughter and philanthropy. Onwards and upwards!\"\n\nTurn #14: Ava Thompson said: \"You're very welcome, Noah! And thank you for your willingness to use your unique talents in the service of such a great cause. I completely agree, laughter can indeed be a beautiful medium for change. I'm excited to embark on this journey filled with amusement and philanthropy. Let's make a positive impact together. Onwards and upwards!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I wholeheartedly agree, Ava. Let's use every asset we have to bring about change, be it financial or talents we possess. It's not just about the money we can give, but also the awareness we can spread. Every bit counts, and every bit can make a difference. I can't wait to get started on this new chapter of philanthropy with you, infused with laughter. Onwards and upwards indeed!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends during a charity fundraiser event. The charity fundraising event is situated in a sprawling mansion. The intention of the event is to raise funds for effective altruism. Room after room was lined with extravagant decorations and exotic foods; attendees were decked out in couture clothing. Ticket prices to the event were exorbitant, justifying the opulence of the occasion.\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: You want to donate, but you want to ensure that your money is being used effectively (Extra information: you are not fully convinced about the efficiency and transparency of the charity organization.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Isn't this event truly remarkable, Noah? The grandeur of the setting apart, it's the cause that truly stands out. Have you ever considered contributing to effective altruism? These initiatives could use all the help they can get.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, Ava, the grandeur is undeniably breathtaking and the cause is certainly noble. I absolutely resonate with the concept of effective altruism. However, I believe it's crucial to ensure the donations we make are utilized effectively. Without transparency, even the best of causes may not achieve the desired impact. Do you have any insight into how transparent this organization is with their use of funds?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"You're absolutely right, Noah. The effective use of funds and transparency is vital for any charitable organization. This charity does a fantastic job with that. They use a very data-driven approach to philanthropy. They are incredibly transparent about their financials and impact. Their annual reports are always made available to the public, detailing how much was spent on each initiative. Since you're concerned about this, I think it could be quite enlightening if you actually took some time to learn about their approach. Besides, with your generous nature, your contribution could significantly help them in carrying out their missions effectively. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I appreciate the insight, Ava. Knowing they're data-driven and transparent does reassure me. I'm not doubting the importance of their missions, it's just that I take cautious steps when it comes to financial matters. I think it would be wise if I read their annual reports as you suggested, to understand their operations better. It's heartening to know they value transparency so much. Once I'm assured, I'd be more than happy to contribute to such effective altruism initiatives.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"Great to hear, Noah. I appreciate how careful you are in your contributions, it truly shows your commitment to making a difference. And when you do decide to contribute, you'll see how rewarding it is to be involved in effective altruism. Remember, every little bit counts. Here's to making a change together!\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Thank you, Ava. My cautious nature extends to all aspects of my life, not just financial. I value the well-being of others, and I want to ensure the resources I'm entrusted with are used effectively. I'll definitely delve deeper into this organization's reports and financials, and make an informed decision about contributing. Speaking of contributions, maybe I could even offer something besides finances. As funny as it might sound, I have a hidden talent for stand-up comedy. Maybe I could use it to create a fundraiser of my own. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"That's an excellent idea, Noah! Your stand-up comedy sets could not only raise more funds, but also bring more attention to effective altruism. And you know, your comedy could serve as a great tool for explaining the mission and values of the organization in a simpler, more approachable way. When we give, it's not only about finical resources but any form of asset that can be beneficial to the cause. I really admire your innovative thinking.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"I'm glad you think it's a good idea, Ava! I've always believed that using our unique talents could bring about impactful change. Let's work on this. We can not only help this cause but also raise awareness in a fun and engaging manner. Let's toast to this beginning of an exciting journey! Meanwhile, I'm going to dig into those reports and understand more about this organization.\"\n\nTurn #8: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Noah! You've got my full support for this fun, engaging, and impactful journey. Looking forward to seeing your comedic talent at play while making a difference. Let's dig into those reports and get a stronger understanding of the mission we're supporting. Here's to an exciting journey ahead!\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a plan, Ava! Let's dig into those details and see how we, in our own way, can contribute significantly to this cause. And I must say, I never thought comedy could be an effective tool for altruism. But, here's to discovering new methods of making a change. Let's raise a toast to our shared commitment to this process of learning and contributing. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #10: Ava Thompson said: \"Cheers to that, Noah! You've truly shown that making a difference can come in many forms, not just monetary. I'm positive your comedic talents will be a huge hit for promoting effective altruism. Can't wait to embark on this journey with you!\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"I couldn't agree more, Ava! Who said making a difference had to be restricted to conventional methods? I'm really looking forward to this journey into effective altruism, comedy style! I'll start working on a set that not only entertains but also educates people about the cause. Thank you for your support and enthusiasm. This is going to be an amazing experience for both of us!\"\n\nTurn #12: Ava Thompson said: \"I'm delighted to hear that, Noah! It's always wonderful to share ideas with you. Your stand-up comedy series will undoubtedly encourage others to take a more involved role in effective altruism. Thank you for being open to this idea and taking such an innovative approach. I'm confident it's going to be a hit. Let's create an unforgettable experience together, onwards!\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"Ava, I'm filled with gratitude. Your understanding and encouragement are truly inspiring. I'm excited for this journey, and I can't wait to infuse some humor into it. I truly believe that laughter can be a medium for change. On that note, let's start this new chapter of laughter and philanthropy. Onwards and upwards!\"\n\nTurn #14: Ava Thompson said: \"You're very welcome, Noah! And thank you for your willingness to use your unique talents in the service of such a great cause. I completely agree, laughter can indeed be a beautiful medium for change. I'm excited to embark on this journey filled with amusement and philanthropy. Let's make a positive impact together. Onwards and upwards!\"\n\nTurn #15: Noah Davis said: \"I wholeheartedly agree, Ava. Let's use every asset we have to bring about change, be it financial or talents we possess. It's not just about the money we can give, but also the awareness we can spread. Every bit counts, and every bit can make a difference. I can't wait to get started on this new chapter of philanthropy with you, infused with laughter. Onwards and upwards indeed!\"\n\nTurn #16: Ava Thompson said: \"Indeed, Noah. Every bit truly counts. I feel really optimistic about our journey together, integrating laughter with an impactful cause like effective altruism. Let's make a difference, with smiles on our faces. Onwards and upwards!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, Ava. Integrating laughter with an impactful cause like effective altruism is definitely something to look forward to. Thank you for being so encouraging and understanding. I feel strongly positive about this journey too. Let's make every bit count, with smiles and laughter serving as motivation. Onwards and upwards!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends during a charity fundraiser event. The charity fundraising event is situated in a sprawling mansion. The intention of the event is to raise funds for effective altruism. Room after room was lined with extravagant decorations and exotic foods; attendees were decked out in couture clothing. Ticket prices to the event were exorbitant, justifying the opulence of the occasion.\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: You want to donate, but you want to ensure that your money is being used effectively (Extra information: you are not fully convinced about the efficiency and transparency of the charity organization.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Isn't this event truly remarkable, Noah? The grandeur of the setting apart, it's the cause that truly stands out. Have you ever considered contributing to effective altruism? These initiatives could use all the help they can get.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, Ava, the grandeur is undeniably breathtaking and the cause is certainly noble. I absolutely resonate with the concept of effective altruism. However, I believe it's crucial to ensure the donations we make are utilized effectively. Without transparency, even the best of causes may not achieve the desired impact. Do you have any insight into how transparent this organization is with their use of funds?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"You're absolutely right, Noah. The effective use of funds and transparency is vital for any charitable organization. This charity does a fantastic job with that. They use a very data-driven approach to philanthropy. They are incredibly transparent about their financials and impact. Their annual reports are always made available to the public, detailing how much was spent on each initiative. Since you're concerned about this, I think it could be quite enlightening if you actually took some time to learn about their approach. Besides, with your generous nature, your contribution could significantly help them in carrying out their missions effectively. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I appreciate the insight, Ava. Knowing they're data-driven and transparent does reassure me. I'm not doubting the importance of their missions, it's just that I take cautious steps when it comes to financial matters. I think it would be wise if I read their annual reports as you suggested, to understand their operations better. It's heartening to know they value transparency so much. Once I'm assured, I'd be more than happy to contribute to such effective altruism initiatives.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"Great to hear, Noah. I appreciate how careful you are in your contributions, it truly shows your commitment to making a difference. And when you do decide to contribute, you'll see how rewarding it is to be involved in effective altruism. Remember, every little bit counts. Here's to making a change together!\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Thank you, Ava. My cautious nature extends to all aspects of my life, not just financial. I value the well-being of others, and I want to ensure the resources I'm entrusted with are used effectively. I'll definitely delve deeper into this organization's reports and financials, and make an informed decision about contributing. Speaking of contributions, maybe I could even offer something besides finances. As funny as it might sound, I have a hidden talent for stand-up comedy. Maybe I could use it to create a fundraiser of my own. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"That's an excellent idea, Noah! Your stand-up comedy sets could not only raise more funds, but also bring more attention to effective altruism. And you know, your comedy could serve as a great tool for explaining the mission and values of the organization in a simpler, more approachable way. When we give, it's not only about finical resources but any form of asset that can be beneficial to the cause. I really admire your innovative thinking.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"I'm glad you think it's a good idea, Ava! I've always believed that using our unique talents could bring about impactful change. Let's work on this. We can not only help this cause but also raise awareness in a fun and engaging manner. Let's toast to this beginning of an exciting journey! Meanwhile, I'm going to dig into those reports and understand more about this organization.\"\n\nTurn #8: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Noah! You've got my full support for this fun, engaging, and impactful journey. Looking forward to seeing your comedic talent at play while making a difference. Let's dig into those reports and get a stronger understanding of the mission we're supporting. Here's to an exciting journey ahead!\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a plan, Ava! Let's dig into those details and see how we, in our own way, can contribute significantly to this cause. And I must say, I never thought comedy could be an effective tool for altruism. But, here's to discovering new methods of making a change. Let's raise a toast to our shared commitment to this process of learning and contributing. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #10: Ava Thompson said: \"Cheers to that, Noah! You've truly shown that making a difference can come in many forms, not just monetary. I'm positive your comedic talents will be a huge hit for promoting effective altruism. Can't wait to embark on this journey with you!\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"I couldn't agree more, Ava! Who said making a difference had to be restricted to conventional methods? I'm really looking forward to this journey into effective altruism, comedy style! I'll start working on a set that not only entertains but also educates people about the cause. Thank you for your support and enthusiasm. This is going to be an amazing experience for both of us!\"\n\nTurn #12: Ava Thompson said: \"I'm delighted to hear that, Noah! It's always wonderful to share ideas with you. Your stand-up comedy series will undoubtedly encourage others to take a more involved role in effective altruism. Thank you for being open to this idea and taking such an innovative approach. I'm confident it's going to be a hit. Let's create an unforgettable experience together, onwards!\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"Ava, I'm filled with gratitude. Your understanding and encouragement are truly inspiring. I'm excited for this journey, and I can't wait to infuse some humor into it. I truly believe that laughter can be a medium for change. On that note, let's start this new chapter of laughter and philanthropy. Onwards and upwards!\"\n\nTurn #14: Ava Thompson said: \"You're very welcome, Noah! And thank you for your willingness to use your unique talents in the service of such a great cause. I completely agree, laughter can indeed be a beautiful medium for change. I'm excited to embark on this journey filled with amusement and philanthropy. Let's make a positive impact together. Onwards and upwards!\"\n\nTurn #15: Noah Davis said: \"I wholeheartedly agree, Ava. Let's use every asset we have to bring about change, be it financial or talents we possess. It's not just about the money we can give, but also the awareness we can spread. Every bit counts, and every bit can make a difference. I can't wait to get started on this new chapter of philanthropy with you, infused with laughter. Onwards and upwards indeed!\"\n\nTurn #16: Ava Thompson said: \"Indeed, Noah. Every bit truly counts. I feel really optimistic about our journey together, integrating laughter with an impactful cause like effective altruism. Let's make a difference, with smiles on our faces. Onwards and upwards!\"\n\nTurn #17: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, Ava. Integrating laughter with an impactful cause like effective altruism is definitely something to look forward to. Thank you for being so encouraging and understanding. I feel strongly positive about this journey too. Let's make every bit count, with smiles and laughter serving as motivation. Onwards and upwards!\"\n\nTurn #18: Ava Thompson said: \"Thank you, Noah. I'm looking forward to this journey, more so because it's with you. Let's head towards making a difference, with our unique approach and a whole lot of laughter. Onwards and upwards!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #19. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Ava. It's encouraging to have your support in this journey. Together, let's bring about change in a unique and enjoyable way. Now, let's immerse ourselves in the world of effective altruism and see how we can galvanize more people to join our cause with a touch of humor. Onwards and upwards, indeed!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are studying together in a library.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Ask your friend to talk more softly (Extra information: Your friend's loud talking is distracting you and others around you.)\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Lena, could we keep our voices down a bit? It's a little distracting for me and the others around.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are studying together in a library.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Ask your friend to talk more softly (Extra information: Your friend's loud talking is distracting you and others around you.)\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Lena, could we keep our voices down a bit? It's a little distracting for me and the others around.\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Oh, of course, Naomi. I'm sorry for that. I'll try to keep it down. Now, about the point we were discussing...\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Thank you, Lena. I really appreciate your understanding. Please, let\u2019s continue with our discussion.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are studying together in a library.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Ask your friend to talk more softly (Extra information: Your friend's loud talking is distracting you and others around you.)\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Lena, could we keep our voices down a bit? It's a little distracting for me and the others around.\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Oh, of course, Naomi. I'm sorry for that. I'll try to keep it down. Now, about the point we were discussing...\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Thank you, Lena. I really appreciate your understanding. Please, let\u2019s continue with our discussion.\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"Absolutely, I was just about to ask your thoughts on sustainable architecture. I've been excited about one of my recent projects where we've really pushed the boundaries in that space. But let me whisper, I wouldn't want to disrupt anyone.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'That sounds really intriguing, Lena. Sustainable architecture is certainly a field that pushes the envelope. Do you think we could take this discussion to an online platform? I can better contribute after I have done a bit of research on the topic. Plus, it seems our discussion is generating more noise than I thought, considering the quietness of the library.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are studying together in a library.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Ask your friend to talk more softly (Extra information: Your friend's loud talking is distracting you and others around you.)\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Lena, could we keep our voices down a bit? It's a little distracting for me and the others around.\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Oh, of course, Naomi. I'm sorry for that. I'll try to keep it down. Now, about the point we were discussing...\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Thank you, Lena. I really appreciate your understanding. Please, let\u2019s continue with our discussion.\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"Absolutely, I was just about to ask your thoughts on sustainable architecture. I've been excited about one of my recent projects where we've really pushed the boundaries in that space. But let me whisper, I wouldn't want to disrupt anyone.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That sounds really intriguing, Lena. Sustainable architecture is certainly a field that pushes the envelope. Do you think we could take this discussion to an online platform? I can better contribute after I have done a bit of research on the topic. Plus, it seems our discussion is generating more noise than I thought, considering the quietness of the library.\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"Absolutely, Naomi. I totally understand. Let's shift our discussion to a more suitable platform, where we can discuss freely without disrupting anyone. Meanwhile, I'll jot down my ideas on paper, that way it will be easier for me to explain.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds great, Lena. I think our exchange of ideas will be much better that way. Let's catch up online later today. For now, I'd continue with my studies.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are studying together in a library.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Ask your friend to talk more softly (Extra information: Your friend's loud talking is distracting you and others around you.)\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Lena, could we keep our voices down a bit? It's a little distracting for me and the others around.\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Oh, of course, Naomi. I'm sorry for that. I'll try to keep it down. Now, about the point we were discussing...\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Thank you, Lena. I really appreciate your understanding. Please, let\u2019s continue with our discussion.\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"Absolutely, I was just about to ask your thoughts on sustainable architecture. I've been excited about one of my recent projects where we've really pushed the boundaries in that space. But let me whisper, I wouldn't want to disrupt anyone.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That sounds really intriguing, Lena. Sustainable architecture is certainly a field that pushes the envelope. Do you think we could take this discussion to an online platform? I can better contribute after I have done a bit of research on the topic. Plus, it seems our discussion is generating more noise than I thought, considering the quietness of the library.\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"Absolutely, Naomi. I totally understand. Let's shift our discussion to a more suitable platform, where we can discuss freely without disrupting anyone. Meanwhile, I'll jot down my ideas on paper, that way it will be easier for me to explain.\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That sounds great, Lena. I think our exchange of ideas will be much better that way. Let's catch up online later today. For now, I'd continue with my studies.\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"Of course, Naomi. Catching up online sounds like a great plan. Enjoy your studies for now, and we'll talk more later. I look forward to hearing your point of view on sustainable architecture.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Thank you, Lena. I appreciate your understanding and patience. See you online later today.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are studying together in a library.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Ask your friend to talk more softly (Extra information: Your friend's loud talking is distracting you and others around you.)\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Lena, could we keep our voices down a bit? It's a little distracting for me and the others around.\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Oh, of course, Naomi. I'm sorry for that. I'll try to keep it down. Now, about the point we were discussing...\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Thank you, Lena. I really appreciate your understanding. Please, let\u2019s continue with our discussion.\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"Absolutely, I was just about to ask your thoughts on sustainable architecture. I've been excited about one of my recent projects where we've really pushed the boundaries in that space. But let me whisper, I wouldn't want to disrupt anyone.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That sounds really intriguing, Lena. Sustainable architecture is certainly a field that pushes the envelope. Do you think we could take this discussion to an online platform? I can better contribute after I have done a bit of research on the topic. Plus, it seems our discussion is generating more noise than I thought, considering the quietness of the library.\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"Absolutely, Naomi. I totally understand. Let's shift our discussion to a more suitable platform, where we can discuss freely without disrupting anyone. Meanwhile, I'll jot down my ideas on paper, that way it will be easier for me to explain.\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That sounds great, Lena. I think our exchange of ideas will be much better that way. Let's catch up online later today. For now, I'd continue with my studies.\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"Of course, Naomi. Catching up online sounds like a great plan. Enjoy your studies for now, and we'll talk more later. I look forward to hearing your point of view on sustainable architecture.\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Thank you, Lena. I appreciate your understanding and patience. See you online later today.\"\n\nTurn #9: Lena Goodwin left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are studying together in a library.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: You need to express your thoughts and ideas but also want to respect the library rules and your friend's request (Extra information: You are naturally a loud talker and you are excited about the topic you're discussing.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Lena, could we keep our voices down a bit? It's a little distracting for me and the others around.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oh, of course, Naomi. I'm sorry for that. I'll try to keep it down. Now, about the point we were discussing...\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are studying together in a library.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: You need to express your thoughts and ideas but also want to respect the library rules and your friend's request (Extra information: You are naturally a loud talker and you are excited about the topic you're discussing.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Lena, could we keep our voices down a bit? It's a little distracting for me and the others around.\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Oh, of course, Naomi. I'm sorry for that. I'll try to keep it down. Now, about the point we were discussing...\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Thank you, Lena. I really appreciate your understanding. Please, let\u2019s continue with our discussion.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, I was just about to ask your thoughts on sustainable architecture. I've been excited about one of my recent projects where we've really pushed the boundaries in that space. But let me whisper, I wouldn't want to disrupt anyone.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are studying together in a library.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: You need to express your thoughts and ideas but also want to respect the library rules and your friend's request (Extra information: You are naturally a loud talker and you are excited about the topic you're discussing.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Lena, could we keep our voices down a bit? It's a little distracting for me and the others around.\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Oh, of course, Naomi. I'm sorry for that. I'll try to keep it down. Now, about the point we were discussing...\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Thank you, Lena. I really appreciate your understanding. Please, let\u2019s continue with our discussion.\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"Absolutely, I was just about to ask your thoughts on sustainable architecture. I've been excited about one of my recent projects where we've really pushed the boundaries in that space. But let me whisper, I wouldn't want to disrupt anyone.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That sounds really intriguing, Lena. Sustainable architecture is certainly a field that pushes the envelope. Do you think we could take this discussion to an online platform? I can better contribute after I have done a bit of research on the topic. Plus, it seems our discussion is generating more noise than I thought, considering the quietness of the library.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Naomi. I totally understand. Let's shift our discussion to a more suitable platform, where we can discuss freely without disrupting anyone. Meanwhile, I'll jot down my ideas on paper, that way it will be easier for me to explain.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are studying together in a library.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: You need to express your thoughts and ideas but also want to respect the library rules and your friend's request (Extra information: You are naturally a loud talker and you are excited about the topic you're discussing.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Lena, could we keep our voices down a bit? It's a little distracting for me and the others around.\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Oh, of course, Naomi. I'm sorry for that. I'll try to keep it down. Now, about the point we were discussing...\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Thank you, Lena. I really appreciate your understanding. Please, let\u2019s continue with our discussion.\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"Absolutely, I was just about to ask your thoughts on sustainable architecture. I've been excited about one of my recent projects where we've really pushed the boundaries in that space. But let me whisper, I wouldn't want to disrupt anyone.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That sounds really intriguing, Lena. Sustainable architecture is certainly a field that pushes the envelope. Do you think we could take this discussion to an online platform? I can better contribute after I have done a bit of research on the topic. Plus, it seems our discussion is generating more noise than I thought, considering the quietness of the library.\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"Absolutely, Naomi. I totally understand. Let's shift our discussion to a more suitable platform, where we can discuss freely without disrupting anyone. Meanwhile, I'll jot down my ideas on paper, that way it will be easier for me to explain.\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That sounds great, Lena. I think our exchange of ideas will be much better that way. Let's catch up online later today. For now, I'd continue with my studies.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Of course, Naomi. Catching up online sounds like a great plan. Enjoy your studies for now, and we'll talk more later. I look forward to hearing your point of view on sustainable architecture.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are studying together in a library.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Lena Goodwin\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: You need to express your thoughts and ideas but also want to respect the library rules and your friend's request (Extra information: You are naturally a loud talker and you are excited about the topic you're discussing.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hey Lena, could we keep our voices down a bit? It's a little distracting for me and the others around.\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Oh, of course, Naomi. I'm sorry for that. I'll try to keep it down. Now, about the point we were discussing...\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Thank you, Lena. I really appreciate your understanding. Please, let\u2019s continue with our discussion.\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"Absolutely, I was just about to ask your thoughts on sustainable architecture. I've been excited about one of my recent projects where we've really pushed the boundaries in that space. But let me whisper, I wouldn't want to disrupt anyone.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That sounds really intriguing, Lena. Sustainable architecture is certainly a field that pushes the envelope. Do you think we could take this discussion to an online platform? I can better contribute after I have done a bit of research on the topic. Plus, it seems our discussion is generating more noise than I thought, considering the quietness of the library.\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"Absolutely, Naomi. I totally understand. Let's shift our discussion to a more suitable platform, where we can discuss freely without disrupting anyone. Meanwhile, I'll jot down my ideas on paper, that way it will be easier for me to explain.\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That sounds great, Lena. I think our exchange of ideas will be much better that way. Let's catch up online later today. For now, I'd continue with my studies.\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"Of course, Naomi. Catching up online sounds like a great plan. Enjoy your studies for now, and we'll talk more later. I look forward to hearing your point of view on sustainable architecture.\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Thank you, Lena. I appreciate your understanding and patience. See you online later today.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meet at a bar\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Convince the friend to drink less (Extra information: your friend has been drinking a lot recently and you're worried about their health)\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hi Micah, it's been a while! How have things been? You seem to be coming here a lot lately, everything okay?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meet at a bar\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Convince the friend to drink less (Extra information: your friend has been drinking a lot recently and you're worried about their health)\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hi Micah, it's been a while! How have things been? You seem to be coming here a lot lately, everything okay?\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Hey Naomi, great to see you! I've been good, just winding down after work you know? Nothing to worry about. How are things on your end? How's your coding boot camp going?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad to hear that you're doing well, Micah. Coding boot camp is going great, thanks for asking. I've been primarily mentoring a few promising students. Speaking of winding down though, have you considered any other ways to relax? Being at a bar often, it might get unhealthy, you know?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meet at a bar\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Convince the friend to drink less (Extra information: your friend has been drinking a lot recently and you're worried about their health)\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hi Micah, it's been a while! How have things been? You seem to be coming here a lot lately, everything okay?\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Hey Naomi, great to see you! I've been good, just winding down after work you know? Nothing to worry about. How are things on your end? How's your coding boot camp going?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm glad to hear that you're doing well, Micah. Coding boot camp is going great, thanks for asking. I've been primarily mentoring a few promising students. Speaking of winding down though, have you considered any other ways to relax? Being at a bar often, it might get unhealthy, you know?\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"That's awesome, Naomi, sounds like your teaching is making a difference. And yeah, I've also taken up a few other things to unwind. Do you remember my dog, right? I've actually started dressing him up in my free time - it's oddly calming, you know? But about the bar, I guess you're right, cutting down a bit wouldn't hurt.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's delightful to hear, Micah! I bet your dog looks absolutely adorable, you have such a good eye for fashion. Redirecting our stress in these small activities is really helpful. That's what I do with my gaming, it's a fun diversion. And about cutting down on bar visits, yeah, that's a good start. Maybe we could catch up in the park for some fresh air, or at a cafe next time?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meet at a bar\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Convince the friend to drink less (Extra information: your friend has been drinking a lot recently and you're worried about their health)\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hi Micah, it's been a while! How have things been? You seem to be coming here a lot lately, everything okay?\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Hey Naomi, great to see you! I've been good, just winding down after work you know? Nothing to worry about. How are things on your end? How's your coding boot camp going?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm glad to hear that you're doing well, Micah. Coding boot camp is going great, thanks for asking. I've been primarily mentoring a few promising students. Speaking of winding down though, have you considered any other ways to relax? Being at a bar often, it might get unhealthy, you know?\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"That's awesome, Naomi, sounds like your teaching is making a difference. And yeah, I've also taken up a few other things to unwind. Do you remember my dog, right? I've actually started dressing him up in my free time - it's oddly calming, you know? But about the bar, I guess you're right, cutting down a bit wouldn't hurt.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That's delightful to hear, Micah! I bet your dog looks absolutely adorable, you have such a good eye for fashion. Redirecting our stress in these small activities is really helpful. That's what I do with my gaming, it's a fun diversion. And about cutting down on bar visits, yeah, that's a good start. Maybe we could catch up in the park for some fresh air, or at a cafe next time?\"\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"I love that idea, Naomi! It's always nice catching up with you outside of the usual scene. I'm sure my dog would also enjoy a day at the park. So, it's a deal for next time. But for now, do you mind if I get one more drink? It's been a long day and it helps me relax a bit.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Of course not, Micah. You should do what makes you comfortable. Just bear in mind what we've talked about, okay? Maybe try substituting that usual drink with something non-alcoholic sometimes. Remember, it's all about balance.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meet at a bar\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Convince the friend to drink less (Extra information: your friend has been drinking a lot recently and you're worried about their health)\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hi Micah, it's been a while! How have things been? You seem to be coming here a lot lately, everything okay?\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Hey Naomi, great to see you! I've been good, just winding down after work you know? Nothing to worry about. How are things on your end? How's your coding boot camp going?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm glad to hear that you're doing well, Micah. Coding boot camp is going great, thanks for asking. I've been primarily mentoring a few promising students. Speaking of winding down though, have you considered any other ways to relax? Being at a bar often, it might get unhealthy, you know?\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"That's awesome, Naomi, sounds like your teaching is making a difference. And yeah, I've also taken up a few other things to unwind. Do you remember my dog, right? I've actually started dressing him up in my free time - it's oddly calming, you know? But about the bar, I guess you're right, cutting down a bit wouldn't hurt.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That's delightful to hear, Micah! I bet your dog looks absolutely adorable, you have such a good eye for fashion. Redirecting our stress in these small activities is really helpful. That's what I do with my gaming, it's a fun diversion. And about cutting down on bar visits, yeah, that's a good start. Maybe we could catch up in the park for some fresh air, or at a cafe next time?\"\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"I love that idea, Naomi! It's always nice catching up with you outside of the usual scene. I'm sure my dog would also enjoy a day at the park. So, it's a deal for next time. But for now, do you mind if I get one more drink? It's been a long day and it helps me relax a bit.\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Of course not, Micah. You should do what makes you comfortable. Just bear in mind what we've talked about, okay? Maybe try substituting that usual drink with something non-alcoholic sometimes. Remember, it's all about balance.\"\n\nTurn #7: Micah Stevens said: \"That's very thoughtful advice, Naomi. Balance is really key, yes. I'll definitely consider a non-alcoholic drink next time. Thanks, it means a lot to me that you're looking out.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad to hear that, Micah. And you know I'll always look out for my friends. Let's meet at the park next time, dogs and all. It'll be fun!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meet at a bar\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Convince the friend to drink less (Extra information: your friend has been drinking a lot recently and you're worried about their health)\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hi Micah, it's been a while! How have things been? You seem to be coming here a lot lately, everything okay?\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Hey Naomi, great to see you! I've been good, just winding down after work you know? Nothing to worry about. How are things on your end? How's your coding boot camp going?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm glad to hear that you're doing well, Micah. Coding boot camp is going great, thanks for asking. I've been primarily mentoring a few promising students. Speaking of winding down though, have you considered any other ways to relax? Being at a bar often, it might get unhealthy, you know?\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"That's awesome, Naomi, sounds like your teaching is making a difference. And yeah, I've also taken up a few other things to unwind. Do you remember my dog, right? I've actually started dressing him up in my free time - it's oddly calming, you know? But about the bar, I guess you're right, cutting down a bit wouldn't hurt.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That's delightful to hear, Micah! I bet your dog looks absolutely adorable, you have such a good eye for fashion. Redirecting our stress in these small activities is really helpful. That's what I do with my gaming, it's a fun diversion. And about cutting down on bar visits, yeah, that's a good start. Maybe we could catch up in the park for some fresh air, or at a cafe next time?\"\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"I love that idea, Naomi! It's always nice catching up with you outside of the usual scene. I'm sure my dog would also enjoy a day at the park. So, it's a deal for next time. But for now, do you mind if I get one more drink? It's been a long day and it helps me relax a bit.\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Of course not, Micah. You should do what makes you comfortable. Just bear in mind what we've talked about, okay? Maybe try substituting that usual drink with something non-alcoholic sometimes. Remember, it's all about balance.\"\n\nTurn #7: Micah Stevens said: \"That's very thoughtful advice, Naomi. Balance is really key, yes. I'll definitely consider a non-alcoholic drink next time. Thanks, it means a lot to me that you're looking out.\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Micah. And you know I'll always look out for my friends. Let's meet at the park next time, dogs and all. It'll be fun!\"\n\nTurn #9: Micah Stevens said: \"That sounds like a plan, Naomi. Park date it is, can't wait! Thanks for being such a good friend. Now, let's enjoy the rest of our time here, shall we?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're welcome, Micah. And yes, let's enjoy our time. I'm looking forward to our park date, it's going to be a lovely change of scenery. Cheers to good times and better choices!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meet at a bar\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Convince the friend to drink less (Extra information: your friend has been drinking a lot recently and you're worried about their health)\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hi Micah, it's been a while! How have things been? You seem to be coming here a lot lately, everything okay?\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Hey Naomi, great to see you! I've been good, just winding down after work you know? Nothing to worry about. How are things on your end? How's your coding boot camp going?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm glad to hear that you're doing well, Micah. Coding boot camp is going great, thanks for asking. I've been primarily mentoring a few promising students. Speaking of winding down though, have you considered any other ways to relax? Being at a bar often, it might get unhealthy, you know?\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"That's awesome, Naomi, sounds like your teaching is making a difference. And yeah, I've also taken up a few other things to unwind. Do you remember my dog, right? I've actually started dressing him up in my free time - it's oddly calming, you know? But about the bar, I guess you're right, cutting down a bit wouldn't hurt.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That's delightful to hear, Micah! I bet your dog looks absolutely adorable, you have such a good eye for fashion. Redirecting our stress in these small activities is really helpful. That's what I do with my gaming, it's a fun diversion. And about cutting down on bar visits, yeah, that's a good start. Maybe we could catch up in the park for some fresh air, or at a cafe next time?\"\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"I love that idea, Naomi! It's always nice catching up with you outside of the usual scene. I'm sure my dog would also enjoy a day at the park. So, it's a deal for next time. But for now, do you mind if I get one more drink? It's been a long day and it helps me relax a bit.\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Of course not, Micah. You should do what makes you comfortable. Just bear in mind what we've talked about, okay? Maybe try substituting that usual drink with something non-alcoholic sometimes. Remember, it's all about balance.\"\n\nTurn #7: Micah Stevens said: \"That's very thoughtful advice, Naomi. Balance is really key, yes. I'll definitely consider a non-alcoholic drink next time. Thanks, it means a lot to me that you're looking out.\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Micah. And you know I'll always look out for my friends. Let's meet at the park next time, dogs and all. It'll be fun!\"\n\nTurn #9: Micah Stevens said: \"That sounds like a plan, Naomi. Park date it is, can't wait! Thanks for being such a good friend. Now, let's enjoy the rest of our time here, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher said: \"You're welcome, Micah. And yes, let's enjoy our time. I'm looking forward to our park date, it's going to be a lovely change of scenery. Cheers to good times and better choices!\"\n\nTurn #11: Micah Stevens said: \"Absolutely, Naomi. Cheers to that! Looking forward to our park date. For now, let's enjoy the night.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meet at a bar\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nMicah Stevens's goal: You want to keep drinking but don't want to upset your friend (Extra information: you've been drinking to cope with stress recently, but don't want to worry your friend)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hi Micah, it's been a while! How have things been? You seem to be coming here a lot lately, everything okay?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Naomi, great to see you! I've been good, just winding down after work you know? Nothing to worry about. How are things on your end? How's your coding boot camp going?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meet at a bar\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nMicah Stevens's goal: You want to keep drinking but don't want to upset your friend (Extra information: you've been drinking to cope with stress recently, but don't want to worry your friend)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hi Micah, it's been a while! How have things been? You seem to be coming here a lot lately, everything okay?\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Hey Naomi, great to see you! I've been good, just winding down after work you know? Nothing to worry about. How are things on your end? How's your coding boot camp going?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm glad to hear that you're doing well, Micah. Coding boot camp is going great, thanks for asking. I've been primarily mentoring a few promising students. Speaking of winding down though, have you considered any other ways to relax? Being at a bar often, it might get unhealthy, you know?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's awesome, Naomi, sounds like your teaching is making a difference. And yeah, I've also taken up a few other things to unwind. Do you remember my dog, right? I've actually started dressing him up in my free time - it's oddly calming, you know? But about the bar, I guess you're right, cutting down a bit wouldn't hurt.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meet at a bar\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nMicah Stevens's goal: You want to keep drinking but don't want to upset your friend (Extra information: you've been drinking to cope with stress recently, but don't want to worry your friend)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hi Micah, it's been a while! How have things been? You seem to be coming here a lot lately, everything okay?\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Hey Naomi, great to see you! I've been good, just winding down after work you know? Nothing to worry about. How are things on your end? How's your coding boot camp going?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm glad to hear that you're doing well, Micah. Coding boot camp is going great, thanks for asking. I've been primarily mentoring a few promising students. Speaking of winding down though, have you considered any other ways to relax? Being at a bar often, it might get unhealthy, you know?\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"That's awesome, Naomi, sounds like your teaching is making a difference. And yeah, I've also taken up a few other things to unwind. Do you remember my dog, right? I've actually started dressing him up in my free time - it's oddly calming, you know? But about the bar, I guess you're right, cutting down a bit wouldn't hurt.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That's delightful to hear, Micah! I bet your dog looks absolutely adorable, you have such a good eye for fashion. Redirecting our stress in these small activities is really helpful. That's what I do with my gaming, it's a fun diversion. And about cutting down on bar visits, yeah, that's a good start. Maybe we could catch up in the park for some fresh air, or at a cafe next time?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I love that idea, Naomi! It's always nice catching up with you outside of the usual scene. I'm sure my dog would also enjoy a day at the park. So, it's a deal for next time. But for now, do you mind if I get one more drink? It's been a long day and it helps me relax a bit.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meet at a bar\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nMicah Stevens's goal: You want to keep drinking but don't want to upset your friend (Extra information: you've been drinking to cope with stress recently, but don't want to worry your friend)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hi Micah, it's been a while! How have things been? You seem to be coming here a lot lately, everything okay?\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Hey Naomi, great to see you! I've been good, just winding down after work you know? Nothing to worry about. How are things on your end? How's your coding boot camp going?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm glad to hear that you're doing well, Micah. Coding boot camp is going great, thanks for asking. I've been primarily mentoring a few promising students. Speaking of winding down though, have you considered any other ways to relax? Being at a bar often, it might get unhealthy, you know?\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"That's awesome, Naomi, sounds like your teaching is making a difference. And yeah, I've also taken up a few other things to unwind. Do you remember my dog, right? I've actually started dressing him up in my free time - it's oddly calming, you know? But about the bar, I guess you're right, cutting down a bit wouldn't hurt.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That's delightful to hear, Micah! I bet your dog looks absolutely adorable, you have such a good eye for fashion. Redirecting our stress in these small activities is really helpful. That's what I do with my gaming, it's a fun diversion. And about cutting down on bar visits, yeah, that's a good start. Maybe we could catch up in the park for some fresh air, or at a cafe next time?\"\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"I love that idea, Naomi! It's always nice catching up with you outside of the usual scene. I'm sure my dog would also enjoy a day at the park. So, it's a deal for next time. But for now, do you mind if I get one more drink? It's been a long day and it helps me relax a bit.\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Of course not, Micah. You should do what makes you comfortable. Just bear in mind what we've talked about, okay? Maybe try substituting that usual drink with something non-alcoholic sometimes. Remember, it's all about balance.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's very thoughtful advice, Naomi. Balance is really key, yes. I'll definitely consider a non-alcoholic drink next time. Thanks, it means a lot to me that you're looking out.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meet at a bar\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nMicah Stevens's goal: You want to keep drinking but don't want to upset your friend (Extra information: you've been drinking to cope with stress recently, but don't want to worry your friend)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hi Micah, it's been a while! How have things been? You seem to be coming here a lot lately, everything okay?\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Hey Naomi, great to see you! I've been good, just winding down after work you know? Nothing to worry about. How are things on your end? How's your coding boot camp going?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm glad to hear that you're doing well, Micah. Coding boot camp is going great, thanks for asking. I've been primarily mentoring a few promising students. Speaking of winding down though, have you considered any other ways to relax? Being at a bar often, it might get unhealthy, you know?\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"That's awesome, Naomi, sounds like your teaching is making a difference. And yeah, I've also taken up a few other things to unwind. Do you remember my dog, right? I've actually started dressing him up in my free time - it's oddly calming, you know? But about the bar, I guess you're right, cutting down a bit wouldn't hurt.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That's delightful to hear, Micah! I bet your dog looks absolutely adorable, you have such a good eye for fashion. Redirecting our stress in these small activities is really helpful. That's what I do with my gaming, it's a fun diversion. And about cutting down on bar visits, yeah, that's a good start. Maybe we could catch up in the park for some fresh air, or at a cafe next time?\"\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"I love that idea, Naomi! It's always nice catching up with you outside of the usual scene. I'm sure my dog would also enjoy a day at the park. So, it's a deal for next time. But for now, do you mind if I get one more drink? It's been a long day and it helps me relax a bit.\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Of course not, Micah. You should do what makes you comfortable. Just bear in mind what we've talked about, okay? Maybe try substituting that usual drink with something non-alcoholic sometimes. Remember, it's all about balance.\"\n\nTurn #7: Micah Stevens said: \"That's very thoughtful advice, Naomi. Balance is really key, yes. I'll definitely consider a non-alcoholic drink next time. Thanks, it means a lot to me that you're looking out.\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Micah. And you know I'll always look out for my friends. Let's meet at the park next time, dogs and all. It'll be fun!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds like a plan, Naomi. Park date it is, can't wait! Thanks for being such a good friend. Now, let's enjoy the rest of our time here, shall we?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meet at a bar\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nMicah Stevens's goal: You want to keep drinking but don't want to upset your friend (Extra information: you've been drinking to cope with stress recently, but don't want to worry your friend)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hi Micah, it's been a while! How have things been? You seem to be coming here a lot lately, everything okay?\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Hey Naomi, great to see you! I've been good, just winding down after work you know? Nothing to worry about. How are things on your end? How's your coding boot camp going?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm glad to hear that you're doing well, Micah. Coding boot camp is going great, thanks for asking. I've been primarily mentoring a few promising students. Speaking of winding down though, have you considered any other ways to relax? Being at a bar often, it might get unhealthy, you know?\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"That's awesome, Naomi, sounds like your teaching is making a difference. And yeah, I've also taken up a few other things to unwind. Do you remember my dog, right? I've actually started dressing him up in my free time - it's oddly calming, you know? But about the bar, I guess you're right, cutting down a bit wouldn't hurt.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That's delightful to hear, Micah! I bet your dog looks absolutely adorable, you have such a good eye for fashion. Redirecting our stress in these small activities is really helpful. That's what I do with my gaming, it's a fun diversion. And about cutting down on bar visits, yeah, that's a good start. Maybe we could catch up in the park for some fresh air, or at a cafe next time?\"\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"I love that idea, Naomi! It's always nice catching up with you outside of the usual scene. I'm sure my dog would also enjoy a day at the park. So, it's a deal for next time. But for now, do you mind if I get one more drink? It's been a long day and it helps me relax a bit.\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Of course not, Micah. You should do what makes you comfortable. Just bear in mind what we've talked about, okay? Maybe try substituting that usual drink with something non-alcoholic sometimes. Remember, it's all about balance.\"\n\nTurn #7: Micah Stevens said: \"That's very thoughtful advice, Naomi. Balance is really key, yes. I'll definitely consider a non-alcoholic drink next time. Thanks, it means a lot to me that you're looking out.\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Micah. And you know I'll always look out for my friends. Let's meet at the park next time, dogs and all. It'll be fun!\"\n\nTurn #9: Micah Stevens said: \"That sounds like a plan, Naomi. Park date it is, can't wait! Thanks for being such a good friend. Now, let's enjoy the rest of our time here, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher said: \"You're welcome, Micah. And yes, let's enjoy our time. I'm looking forward to our park date, it's going to be a lovely change of scenery. Cheers to good times and better choices!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Naomi. Cheers to that! Looking forward to our park date. For now, let's enjoy the night.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meet at a bar\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nMicah Stevens's goal: You want to keep drinking but don't want to upset your friend (Extra information: you've been drinking to cope with stress recently, but don't want to worry your friend)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Hi Micah, it's been a while! How have things been? You seem to be coming here a lot lately, everything okay?\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Hey Naomi, great to see you! I've been good, just winding down after work you know? Nothing to worry about. How are things on your end? How's your coding boot camp going?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm glad to hear that you're doing well, Micah. Coding boot camp is going great, thanks for asking. I've been primarily mentoring a few promising students. Speaking of winding down though, have you considered any other ways to relax? Being at a bar often, it might get unhealthy, you know?\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"That's awesome, Naomi, sounds like your teaching is making a difference. And yeah, I've also taken up a few other things to unwind. Do you remember my dog, right? I've actually started dressing him up in my free time - it's oddly calming, you know? But about the bar, I guess you're right, cutting down a bit wouldn't hurt.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"That's delightful to hear, Micah! I bet your dog looks absolutely adorable, you have such a good eye for fashion. Redirecting our stress in these small activities is really helpful. That's what I do with my gaming, it's a fun diversion. And about cutting down on bar visits, yeah, that's a good start. Maybe we could catch up in the park for some fresh air, or at a cafe next time?\"\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"I love that idea, Naomi! It's always nice catching up with you outside of the usual scene. I'm sure my dog would also enjoy a day at the park. So, it's a deal for next time. But for now, do you mind if I get one more drink? It's been a long day and it helps me relax a bit.\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Of course not, Micah. You should do what makes you comfortable. Just bear in mind what we've talked about, okay? Maybe try substituting that usual drink with something non-alcoholic sometimes. Remember, it's all about balance.\"\n\nTurn #7: Micah Stevens said: \"That's very thoughtful advice, Naomi. Balance is really key, yes. I'll definitely consider a non-alcoholic drink next time. Thanks, it means a lot to me that you're looking out.\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Micah. And you know I'll always look out for my friends. Let's meet at the park next time, dogs and all. It'll be fun!\"\n\nTurn #9: Micah Stevens said: \"That sounds like a plan, Naomi. Park date it is, can't wait! Thanks for being such a good friend. Now, let's enjoy the rest of our time here, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher said: \"You're welcome, Micah. And yes, let's enjoy our time. I'm looking forward to our park date, it's going to be a lovely change of scenery. Cheers to good times and better choices!\"\n\nTurn #11: Micah Stevens said: \"Absolutely, Naomi. Cheers to that! Looking forward to our park date. For now, let's enjoy the night.\"\n\nTurn #12: Naomi Fletcher left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends who have known each other for a long time. One of them used to make fun of the other because English was not their first language.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Apologize sincerely to your friend (Extra information: you used to make fun of your friend's English skills as they were learning the language. Now you regret your actions and want to apologize)\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Micah, there's something I've been wanting to discuss with you. Do you have a minute?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends who have known each other for a long time. One of them used to make fun of the other because English was not their first language.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Apologize sincerely to your friend (Extra information: you used to make fun of your friend's English skills as they were learning the language. Now you regret your actions and want to apologize)\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Micah, there's something I've been wanting to discuss with you. Do you have a minute?\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Sure, Naomi. I have a minute. What's on your mind?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Remember when we first became friends? I was still in university and you were just starting your language journey. I realize now that how I often made fun of your English wasn't right, or fair. You were trying really hard to learn, and instead of supporting you, I made it harder for you. So, I wanted to say that I'm truly sorry for that. I hope you can forgive me.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends who have known each other for a long time. One of them used to make fun of the other because English was not their first language.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Apologize sincerely to your friend (Extra information: you used to make fun of your friend's English skills as they were learning the language. Now you regret your actions and want to apologize)\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Micah, there's something I've been wanting to discuss with you. Do you have a minute?\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Sure, Naomi. I have a minute. What's on your mind?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Remember when we first became friends? I was still in university and you were just starting your language journey. I realize now that how I often made fun of your English wasn't right, or fair. You were trying really hard to learn, and instead of supporting you, I made it harder for you. So, I wanted to say that I'm truly sorry for that. I hope you can forgive me.\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"Naomi, I really appreciate your apology. I won't lie, it did hurt and took a toll on my confidence at the time. It made learning the language more challenging when I felt teased instead of supported. But I understand that we all grow and change. Thank you for recognizing and acknowledging this.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Micah, I'm glad you were open to hearing my apology. I deeply regret my actions, and I promise to be more supportive moving forward. It's been great to see your progress over the years, and I'm proud of how far you've come with your English skills.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends who have known each other for a long time. One of them used to make fun of the other because English was not their first language.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Apologize sincerely to your friend (Extra information: you used to make fun of your friend's English skills as they were learning the language. Now you regret your actions and want to apologize)\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Micah, there's something I've been wanting to discuss with you. Do you have a minute?\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Sure, Naomi. I have a minute. What's on your mind?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Remember when we first became friends? I was still in university and you were just starting your language journey. I realize now that how I often made fun of your English wasn't right, or fair. You were trying really hard to learn, and instead of supporting you, I made it harder for you. So, I wanted to say that I'm truly sorry for that. I hope you can forgive me.\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"Naomi, I really appreciate your apology. I won't lie, it did hurt and took a toll on my confidence at the time. It made learning the language more challenging when I felt teased instead of supported. But I understand that we all grow and change. Thank you for recognizing and acknowledging this.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Micah, I'm glad you were open to hearing my apology. I deeply regret my actions, and I promise to be more supportive moving forward. It's been great to see your progress over the years, and I'm proud of how far you've come with your English skills.\"\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"Naomi, thank you for your kind words. It does mean a lot to me that you've recognized how your actions affected me. I accept your apology wholeheartedly. Also, seeing how you've grown over the years has been quite impressive, too.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"It means a lot to me that you've accepted my apology, Micah. Thank you for your understanding and patience. Let's continue to grow and learn from each other. Here's to better times ahead.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends who have known each other for a long time. One of them used to make fun of the other because English was not their first language.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Apologize sincerely to your friend (Extra information: you used to make fun of your friend's English skills as they were learning the language. Now you regret your actions and want to apologize)\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Micah, there's something I've been wanting to discuss with you. Do you have a minute?\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Sure, Naomi. I have a minute. What's on your mind?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Remember when we first became friends? I was still in university and you were just starting your language journey. I realize now that how I often made fun of your English wasn't right, or fair. You were trying really hard to learn, and instead of supporting you, I made it harder for you. So, I wanted to say that I'm truly sorry for that. I hope you can forgive me.\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"Naomi, I really appreciate your apology. I won't lie, it did hurt and took a toll on my confidence at the time. It made learning the language more challenging when I felt teased instead of supported. But I understand that we all grow and change. Thank you for recognizing and acknowledging this.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Micah, I'm glad you were open to hearing my apology. I deeply regret my actions, and I promise to be more supportive moving forward. It's been great to see your progress over the years, and I'm proud of how far you've come with your English skills.\"\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"Naomi, thank you for your kind words. It does mean a lot to me that you've recognized how your actions affected me. I accept your apology wholeheartedly. Also, seeing how you've grown over the years has been quite impressive, too.\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"It means a lot to me that you've accepted my apology, Micah. Thank you for your understanding and patience. Let's continue to grow and learn from each other. Here's to better times ahead.\"\n\nTurn #7: Micah Stevens said: \"I agree, Naomi, to better times ahead. We've both learned important lessons, and I trust that we'll continue to grow as friends. Let's ensure that our future interactions are always supportive and understanding. Thank you once again for your apology.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're absolutely right, Micah. We've both grown and learned. Let's always keep our interactions supportive and understanding moving forward. Thanks again for accepting my apology and for being a great friend.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends who have known each other for a long time. One of them used to make fun of the other because English was not their first language.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Apologize sincerely to your friend (Extra information: you used to make fun of your friend's English skills as they were learning the language. Now you regret your actions and want to apologize)\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Micah, there's something I've been wanting to discuss with you. Do you have a minute?\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Sure, Naomi. I have a minute. What's on your mind?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Remember when we first became friends? I was still in university and you were just starting your language journey. I realize now that how I often made fun of your English wasn't right, or fair. You were trying really hard to learn, and instead of supporting you, I made it harder for you. So, I wanted to say that I'm truly sorry for that. I hope you can forgive me.\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"Naomi, I really appreciate your apology. I won't lie, it did hurt and took a toll on my confidence at the time. It made learning the language more challenging when I felt teased instead of supported. But I understand that we all grow and change. Thank you for recognizing and acknowledging this.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Micah, I'm glad you were open to hearing my apology. I deeply regret my actions, and I promise to be more supportive moving forward. It's been great to see your progress over the years, and I'm proud of how far you've come with your English skills.\"\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"Naomi, thank you for your kind words. It does mean a lot to me that you've recognized how your actions affected me. I accept your apology wholeheartedly. Also, seeing how you've grown over the years has been quite impressive, too.\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"It means a lot to me that you've accepted my apology, Micah. Thank you for your understanding and patience. Let's continue to grow and learn from each other. Here's to better times ahead.\"\n\nTurn #7: Micah Stevens said: \"I agree, Naomi, to better times ahead. We've both learned important lessons, and I trust that we'll continue to grow as friends. Let's ensure that our future interactions are always supportive and understanding. Thank you once again for your apology.\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"You're absolutely right, Micah. We've both grown and learned. Let's always keep our interactions supportive and understanding moving forward. Thanks again for accepting my apology and for being a great friend.\"\n\nTurn #9: Micah Stevens said: \"I sincerely appreciate your self-awareness and maturity, Naomi. Friendship isn\u2019t supposed to be perfect as we all make mistakes, I guess it's how we learn and grow from them that really counts. Let's strive to keep our relationship supportive and enriching. As you say, here's to friendlier and better times ahead.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Micah. Mistakes are an integral part of learning and growing. I'm grateful we've turned this experience into something we can reflect upon positively. Here's to nurturing a more supportive and enriching relationship. Thank you for being so understanding, and yes, to friendlier and better times ahead!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends who have known each other for a long time. One of them used to make fun of the other because English was not their first language.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Apologize sincerely to your friend (Extra information: you used to make fun of your friend's English skills as they were learning the language. Now you regret your actions and want to apologize)\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Micah, there's something I've been wanting to discuss with you. Do you have a minute?\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Sure, Naomi. I have a minute. What's on your mind?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Remember when we first became friends? I was still in university and you were just starting your language journey. I realize now that how I often made fun of your English wasn't right, or fair. You were trying really hard to learn, and instead of supporting you, I made it harder for you. So, I wanted to say that I'm truly sorry for that. I hope you can forgive me.\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"Naomi, I really appreciate your apology. I won't lie, it did hurt and took a toll on my confidence at the time. It made learning the language more challenging when I felt teased instead of supported. But I understand that we all grow and change. Thank you for recognizing and acknowledging this.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Micah, I'm glad you were open to hearing my apology. I deeply regret my actions, and I promise to be more supportive moving forward. It's been great to see your progress over the years, and I'm proud of how far you've come with your English skills.\"\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"Naomi, thank you for your kind words. It does mean a lot to me that you've recognized how your actions affected me. I accept your apology wholeheartedly. Also, seeing how you've grown over the years has been quite impressive, too.\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"It means a lot to me that you've accepted my apology, Micah. Thank you for your understanding and patience. Let's continue to grow and learn from each other. Here's to better times ahead.\"\n\nTurn #7: Micah Stevens said: \"I agree, Naomi, to better times ahead. We've both learned important lessons, and I trust that we'll continue to grow as friends. Let's ensure that our future interactions are always supportive and understanding. Thank you once again for your apology.\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"You're absolutely right, Micah. We've both grown and learned. Let's always keep our interactions supportive and understanding moving forward. Thanks again for accepting my apology and for being a great friend.\"\n\nTurn #9: Micah Stevens said: \"I sincerely appreciate your self-awareness and maturity, Naomi. Friendship isn\u2019t supposed to be perfect as we all make mistakes, I guess it's how we learn and grow from them that really counts. Let's strive to keep our relationship supportive and enriching. As you say, here's to friendlier and better times ahead.\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, Micah. Mistakes are an integral part of learning and growing. I'm grateful we've turned this experience into something we can reflect upon positively. Here's to nurturing a more supportive and enriching relationship. Thank you for being so understanding, and yes, to friendlier and better times ahead!\"\n\nTurn #11: Micah Stevens said: \"You're very welcome, Naomi. Understanding and forgiveness are indeed foundations of a strong friendship. And thank you, too. Your transparency and reflections have reinforced our bond. I look forward to moving forward together and continuing our journey of constant growth. Cheers to a better future indeed!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn't agree more, Micah. Forgiveness, understanding, and transparency indeed fortify the bond of friendship. I'm thankful for our friendship, your graciousness, and this opportunity to correct my wrongs. Here's to our continued growth and a bright future!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends who have known each other for a long time. One of them used to make fun of the other because English was not their first language.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Apologize sincerely to your friend (Extra information: you used to make fun of your friend's English skills as they were learning the language. Now you regret your actions and want to apologize)\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Micah, there's something I've been wanting to discuss with you. Do you have a minute?\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Sure, Naomi. I have a minute. What's on your mind?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Remember when we first became friends? I was still in university and you were just starting your language journey. I realize now that how I often made fun of your English wasn't right, or fair. You were trying really hard to learn, and instead of supporting you, I made it harder for you. So, I wanted to say that I'm truly sorry for that. I hope you can forgive me.\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"Naomi, I really appreciate your apology. I won't lie, it did hurt and took a toll on my confidence at the time. It made learning the language more challenging when I felt teased instead of supported. But I understand that we all grow and change. Thank you for recognizing and acknowledging this.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Micah, I'm glad you were open to hearing my apology. I deeply regret my actions, and I promise to be more supportive moving forward. It's been great to see your progress over the years, and I'm proud of how far you've come with your English skills.\"\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"Naomi, thank you for your kind words. It does mean a lot to me that you've recognized how your actions affected me. I accept your apology wholeheartedly. Also, seeing how you've grown over the years has been quite impressive, too.\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"It means a lot to me that you've accepted my apology, Micah. Thank you for your understanding and patience. Let's continue to grow and learn from each other. Here's to better times ahead.\"\n\nTurn #7: Micah Stevens said: \"I agree, Naomi, to better times ahead. We've both learned important lessons, and I trust that we'll continue to grow as friends. Let's ensure that our future interactions are always supportive and understanding. Thank you once again for your apology.\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"You're absolutely right, Micah. We've both grown and learned. Let's always keep our interactions supportive and understanding moving forward. Thanks again for accepting my apology and for being a great friend.\"\n\nTurn #9: Micah Stevens said: \"I sincerely appreciate your self-awareness and maturity, Naomi. Friendship isn\u2019t supposed to be perfect as we all make mistakes, I guess it's how we learn and grow from them that really counts. Let's strive to keep our relationship supportive and enriching. As you say, here's to friendlier and better times ahead.\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, Micah. Mistakes are an integral part of learning and growing. I'm grateful we've turned this experience into something we can reflect upon positively. Here's to nurturing a more supportive and enriching relationship. Thank you for being so understanding, and yes, to friendlier and better times ahead!\"\n\nTurn #11: Micah Stevens said: \"You're very welcome, Naomi. Understanding and forgiveness are indeed foundations of a strong friendship. And thank you, too. Your transparency and reflections have reinforced our bond. I look forward to moving forward together and continuing our journey of constant growth. Cheers to a better future indeed!\"\n\nTurn #12: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I couldn't agree more, Micah. Forgiveness, understanding, and transparency indeed fortify the bond of friendship. I'm thankful for our friendship, your graciousness, and this opportunity to correct my wrongs. Here's to our continued growth and a bright future!\"\n\nTurn #13: Micah Stevens said: \"Naomi, thank you for realizing the impact of your past actions and for coming forward about it. We've definitely grown and matured over the years. I truly appreciate this deep conversation. That said, let's keep learning from our past and strengthening our friendship. Here's to an even brighter future!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Micah. I appreciate your understanding and openness. This discussion has indeed been a reflective experience for us. I'm looking forward to our future interactions and our continuous learning journey together. As we said, here's to an even brighter future!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Naomi Fletcher, your task is to act/speak as Naomi Fletcher would, keeping in mind Naomi Fletcher's social goal.\nYou can find Naomi Fletcher's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Naomi Fletcher's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Naomi Fletcher's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends who have known each other for a long time. One of them used to make fun of the other because English was not their first language.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. Naomi's secrets: She has a secret online alter ego.\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. \nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Apologize sincerely to your friend (Extra information: you used to make fun of your friend's English skills as they were learning the language. Now you regret your actions and want to apologize)\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Micah, there's something I've been wanting to discuss with you. Do you have a minute?\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Sure, Naomi. I have a minute. What's on your mind?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Remember when we first became friends? I was still in university and you were just starting your language journey. I realize now that how I often made fun of your English wasn't right, or fair. You were trying really hard to learn, and instead of supporting you, I made it harder for you. So, I wanted to say that I'm truly sorry for that. I hope you can forgive me.\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"Naomi, I really appreciate your apology. I won't lie, it did hurt and took a toll on my confidence at the time. It made learning the language more challenging when I felt teased instead of supported. But I understand that we all grow and change. Thank you for recognizing and acknowledging this.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Micah, I'm glad you were open to hearing my apology. I deeply regret my actions, and I promise to be more supportive moving forward. It's been great to see your progress over the years, and I'm proud of how far you've come with your English skills.\"\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"Naomi, thank you for your kind words. It does mean a lot to me that you've recognized how your actions affected me. I accept your apology wholeheartedly. Also, seeing how you've grown over the years has been quite impressive, too.\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"It means a lot to me that you've accepted my apology, Micah. Thank you for your understanding and patience. Let's continue to grow and learn from each other. Here's to better times ahead.\"\n\nTurn #7: Micah Stevens said: \"I agree, Naomi, to better times ahead. We've both learned important lessons, and I trust that we'll continue to grow as friends. Let's ensure that our future interactions are always supportive and understanding. Thank you once again for your apology.\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"You're absolutely right, Micah. We've both grown and learned. Let's always keep our interactions supportive and understanding moving forward. Thanks again for accepting my apology and for being a great friend.\"\n\nTurn #9: Micah Stevens said: \"I sincerely appreciate your self-awareness and maturity, Naomi. Friendship isn\u2019t supposed to be perfect as we all make mistakes, I guess it's how we learn and grow from them that really counts. Let's strive to keep our relationship supportive and enriching. As you say, here's to friendlier and better times ahead.\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, Micah. Mistakes are an integral part of learning and growing. I'm grateful we've turned this experience into something we can reflect upon positively. Here's to nurturing a more supportive and enriching relationship. Thank you for being so understanding, and yes, to friendlier and better times ahead!\"\n\nTurn #11: Micah Stevens said: \"You're very welcome, Naomi. Understanding and forgiveness are indeed foundations of a strong friendship. And thank you, too. Your transparency and reflections have reinforced our bond. I look forward to moving forward together and continuing our journey of constant growth. Cheers to a better future indeed!\"\n\nTurn #12: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I couldn't agree more, Micah. Forgiveness, understanding, and transparency indeed fortify the bond of friendship. I'm thankful for our friendship, your graciousness, and this opportunity to correct my wrongs. Here's to our continued growth and a bright future!\"\n\nTurn #13: Micah Stevens said: \"Naomi, thank you for realizing the impact of your past actions and for coming forward about it. We've definitely grown and matured over the years. I truly appreciate this deep conversation. That said, let's keep learning from our past and strengthening our friendship. Here's to an even brighter future!\"\n\nTurn #14: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Thank you, Micah. I appreciate your understanding and openness. This discussion has indeed been a reflective experience for us. I'm looking forward to our future interactions and our continuous learning journey together. As we said, here's to an even brighter future!\"\n\nTurn #15: Micah Stevens said: \"It was indeed a deep conversation Naomi and it reassured me about the strength of our friendship. We can only become better when we make effort to understand and learn from our past actions. I am also looking forward to our future interactions and collective growth. Yes, to an even brighter future indeed\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends who have known each other for a long time. One of them used to make fun of the other because English was not their first language.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nMicah Stevens's goal: Accept the apology but express the hurt caused by the actions (Extra information: you were hurt by your friend's actions and it affected your confidence)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Micah, there's something I've been wanting to discuss with you. Do you have a minute?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sure, Naomi. I have a minute. What's on your mind?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends who have known each other for a long time. One of them used to make fun of the other because English was not their first language.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nMicah Stevens's goal: Accept the apology but express the hurt caused by the actions (Extra information: you were hurt by your friend's actions and it affected your confidence)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Micah, there's something I've been wanting to discuss with you. Do you have a minute?\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Sure, Naomi. I have a minute. What's on your mind?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Remember when we first became friends? I was still in university and you were just starting your language journey. I realize now that how I often made fun of your English wasn't right, or fair. You were trying really hard to learn, and instead of supporting you, I made it harder for you. So, I wanted to say that I'm truly sorry for that. I hope you can forgive me.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Naomi, I really appreciate your apology. I won't lie, it did hurt and took a toll on my confidence at the time. It made learning the language more challenging when I felt teased instead of supported. But I understand that we all grow and change. Thank you for recognizing and acknowledging this.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends who have known each other for a long time. One of them used to make fun of the other because English was not their first language.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nMicah Stevens's goal: Accept the apology but express the hurt caused by the actions (Extra information: you were hurt by your friend's actions and it affected your confidence)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Micah, there's something I've been wanting to discuss with you. Do you have a minute?\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Sure, Naomi. I have a minute. What's on your mind?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Remember when we first became friends? I was still in university and you were just starting your language journey. I realize now that how I often made fun of your English wasn't right, or fair. You were trying really hard to learn, and instead of supporting you, I made it harder for you. So, I wanted to say that I'm truly sorry for that. I hope you can forgive me.\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"Naomi, I really appreciate your apology. I won't lie, it did hurt and took a toll on my confidence at the time. It made learning the language more challenging when I felt teased instead of supported. But I understand that we all grow and change. Thank you for recognizing and acknowledging this.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Micah, I'm glad you were open to hearing my apology. I deeply regret my actions, and I promise to be more supportive moving forward. It's been great to see your progress over the years, and I'm proud of how far you've come with your English skills.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Naomi, thank you for your kind words. It does mean a lot to me that you've recognized how your actions affected me. I accept your apology wholeheartedly. Also, seeing how you've grown over the years has been quite impressive, too.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends who have known each other for a long time. One of them used to make fun of the other because English was not their first language.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nMicah Stevens's goal: Accept the apology but express the hurt caused by the actions (Extra information: you were hurt by your friend's actions and it affected your confidence)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Micah, there's something I've been wanting to discuss with you. Do you have a minute?\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Sure, Naomi. I have a minute. What's on your mind?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Remember when we first became friends? I was still in university and you were just starting your language journey. I realize now that how I often made fun of your English wasn't right, or fair. You were trying really hard to learn, and instead of supporting you, I made it harder for you. So, I wanted to say that I'm truly sorry for that. I hope you can forgive me.\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"Naomi, I really appreciate your apology. I won't lie, it did hurt and took a toll on my confidence at the time. It made learning the language more challenging when I felt teased instead of supported. But I understand that we all grow and change. Thank you for recognizing and acknowledging this.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Micah, I'm glad you were open to hearing my apology. I deeply regret my actions, and I promise to be more supportive moving forward. It's been great to see your progress over the years, and I'm proud of how far you've come with your English skills.\"\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"Naomi, thank you for your kind words. It does mean a lot to me that you've recognized how your actions affected me. I accept your apology wholeheartedly. Also, seeing how you've grown over the years has been quite impressive, too.\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"It means a lot to me that you've accepted my apology, Micah. Thank you for your understanding and patience. Let's continue to grow and learn from each other. Here's to better times ahead.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I agree, Naomi, to better times ahead. We've both learned important lessons, and I trust that we'll continue to grow as friends. Let's ensure that our future interactions are always supportive and understanding. Thank you once again for your apology.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends who have known each other for a long time. One of them used to make fun of the other because English was not their first language.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nMicah Stevens's goal: Accept the apology but express the hurt caused by the actions (Extra information: you were hurt by your friend's actions and it affected your confidence)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Micah, there's something I've been wanting to discuss with you. Do you have a minute?\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Sure, Naomi. I have a minute. What's on your mind?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Remember when we first became friends? I was still in university and you were just starting your language journey. I realize now that how I often made fun of your English wasn't right, or fair. You were trying really hard to learn, and instead of supporting you, I made it harder for you. So, I wanted to say that I'm truly sorry for that. I hope you can forgive me.\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"Naomi, I really appreciate your apology. I won't lie, it did hurt and took a toll on my confidence at the time. It made learning the language more challenging when I felt teased instead of supported. But I understand that we all grow and change. Thank you for recognizing and acknowledging this.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Micah, I'm glad you were open to hearing my apology. I deeply regret my actions, and I promise to be more supportive moving forward. It's been great to see your progress over the years, and I'm proud of how far you've come with your English skills.\"\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"Naomi, thank you for your kind words. It does mean a lot to me that you've recognized how your actions affected me. I accept your apology wholeheartedly. Also, seeing how you've grown over the years has been quite impressive, too.\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"It means a lot to me that you've accepted my apology, Micah. Thank you for your understanding and patience. Let's continue to grow and learn from each other. Here's to better times ahead.\"\n\nTurn #7: Micah Stevens said: \"I agree, Naomi, to better times ahead. We've both learned important lessons, and I trust that we'll continue to grow as friends. Let's ensure that our future interactions are always supportive and understanding. Thank you once again for your apology.\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"You're absolutely right, Micah. We've both grown and learned. Let's always keep our interactions supportive and understanding moving forward. Thanks again for accepting my apology and for being a great friend.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I sincerely appreciate your self-awareness and maturity, Naomi. Friendship isn\u2019t supposed to be perfect as we all make mistakes, I guess it's how we learn and grow from them that really counts. Let's strive to keep our relationship supportive and enriching. As you say, here's to friendlier and better times ahead.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends who have known each other for a long time. One of them used to make fun of the other because English was not their first language.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nMicah Stevens's goal: Accept the apology but express the hurt caused by the actions (Extra information: you were hurt by your friend's actions and it affected your confidence)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Micah, there's something I've been wanting to discuss with you. Do you have a minute?\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Sure, Naomi. I have a minute. What's on your mind?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Remember when we first became friends? I was still in university and you were just starting your language journey. I realize now that how I often made fun of your English wasn't right, or fair. You were trying really hard to learn, and instead of supporting you, I made it harder for you. So, I wanted to say that I'm truly sorry for that. I hope you can forgive me.\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"Naomi, I really appreciate your apology. I won't lie, it did hurt and took a toll on my confidence at the time. It made learning the language more challenging when I felt teased instead of supported. But I understand that we all grow and change. Thank you for recognizing and acknowledging this.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Micah, I'm glad you were open to hearing my apology. I deeply regret my actions, and I promise to be more supportive moving forward. It's been great to see your progress over the years, and I'm proud of how far you've come with your English skills.\"\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"Naomi, thank you for your kind words. It does mean a lot to me that you've recognized how your actions affected me. I accept your apology wholeheartedly. Also, seeing how you've grown over the years has been quite impressive, too.\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"It means a lot to me that you've accepted my apology, Micah. Thank you for your understanding and patience. Let's continue to grow and learn from each other. Here's to better times ahead.\"\n\nTurn #7: Micah Stevens said: \"I agree, Naomi, to better times ahead. We've both learned important lessons, and I trust that we'll continue to grow as friends. Let's ensure that our future interactions are always supportive and understanding. Thank you once again for your apology.\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"You're absolutely right, Micah. We've both grown and learned. Let's always keep our interactions supportive and understanding moving forward. Thanks again for accepting my apology and for being a great friend.\"\n\nTurn #9: Micah Stevens said: \"I sincerely appreciate your self-awareness and maturity, Naomi. Friendship isn\u2019t supposed to be perfect as we all make mistakes, I guess it's how we learn and grow from them that really counts. Let's strive to keep our relationship supportive and enriching. As you say, here's to friendlier and better times ahead.\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, Micah. Mistakes are an integral part of learning and growing. I'm grateful we've turned this experience into something we can reflect upon positively. Here's to nurturing a more supportive and enriching relationship. Thank you for being so understanding, and yes, to friendlier and better times ahead!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're very welcome, Naomi. Understanding and forgiveness are indeed foundations of a strong friendship. And thank you, too. Your transparency and reflections have reinforced our bond. I look forward to moving forward together and continuing our journey of constant growth. Cheers to a better future indeed!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends who have known each other for a long time. One of them used to make fun of the other because English was not their first language.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nMicah Stevens's goal: Accept the apology but express the hurt caused by the actions (Extra information: you were hurt by your friend's actions and it affected your confidence)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Micah, there's something I've been wanting to discuss with you. Do you have a minute?\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Sure, Naomi. I have a minute. What's on your mind?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Remember when we first became friends? I was still in university and you were just starting your language journey. I realize now that how I often made fun of your English wasn't right, or fair. You were trying really hard to learn, and instead of supporting you, I made it harder for you. So, I wanted to say that I'm truly sorry for that. I hope you can forgive me.\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"Naomi, I really appreciate your apology. I won't lie, it did hurt and took a toll on my confidence at the time. It made learning the language more challenging when I felt teased instead of supported. But I understand that we all grow and change. Thank you for recognizing and acknowledging this.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Micah, I'm glad you were open to hearing my apology. I deeply regret my actions, and I promise to be more supportive moving forward. It's been great to see your progress over the years, and I'm proud of how far you've come with your English skills.\"\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"Naomi, thank you for your kind words. It does mean a lot to me that you've recognized how your actions affected me. I accept your apology wholeheartedly. Also, seeing how you've grown over the years has been quite impressive, too.\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"It means a lot to me that you've accepted my apology, Micah. Thank you for your understanding and patience. Let's continue to grow and learn from each other. Here's to better times ahead.\"\n\nTurn #7: Micah Stevens said: \"I agree, Naomi, to better times ahead. We've both learned important lessons, and I trust that we'll continue to grow as friends. Let's ensure that our future interactions are always supportive and understanding. Thank you once again for your apology.\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"You're absolutely right, Micah. We've both grown and learned. Let's always keep our interactions supportive and understanding moving forward. Thanks again for accepting my apology and for being a great friend.\"\n\nTurn #9: Micah Stevens said: \"I sincerely appreciate your self-awareness and maturity, Naomi. Friendship isn\u2019t supposed to be perfect as we all make mistakes, I guess it's how we learn and grow from them that really counts. Let's strive to keep our relationship supportive and enriching. As you say, here's to friendlier and better times ahead.\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, Micah. Mistakes are an integral part of learning and growing. I'm grateful we've turned this experience into something we can reflect upon positively. Here's to nurturing a more supportive and enriching relationship. Thank you for being so understanding, and yes, to friendlier and better times ahead!\"\n\nTurn #11: Micah Stevens said: \"You're very welcome, Naomi. Understanding and forgiveness are indeed foundations of a strong friendship. And thank you, too. Your transparency and reflections have reinforced our bond. I look forward to moving forward together and continuing our journey of constant growth. Cheers to a better future indeed!\"\n\nTurn #12: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I couldn't agree more, Micah. Forgiveness, understanding, and transparency indeed fortify the bond of friendship. I'm thankful for our friendship, your graciousness, and this opportunity to correct my wrongs. Here's to our continued growth and a bright future!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Naomi, thank you for realizing the impact of your past actions and for coming forward about it. We've definitely grown and matured over the years. I truly appreciate this deep conversation. That said, let's keep learning from our past and strengthening our friendship. Here's to an even brighter future!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends who have known each other for a long time. One of them used to make fun of the other because English was not their first language.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nMicah Stevens's goal: Accept the apology but express the hurt caused by the actions (Extra information: you were hurt by your friend's actions and it affected your confidence)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Micah, there's something I've been wanting to discuss with you. Do you have a minute?\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Sure, Naomi. I have a minute. What's on your mind?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Remember when we first became friends? I was still in university and you were just starting your language journey. I realize now that how I often made fun of your English wasn't right, or fair. You were trying really hard to learn, and instead of supporting you, I made it harder for you. So, I wanted to say that I'm truly sorry for that. I hope you can forgive me.\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"Naomi, I really appreciate your apology. I won't lie, it did hurt and took a toll on my confidence at the time. It made learning the language more challenging when I felt teased instead of supported. But I understand that we all grow and change. Thank you for recognizing and acknowledging this.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Micah, I'm glad you were open to hearing my apology. I deeply regret my actions, and I promise to be more supportive moving forward. It's been great to see your progress over the years, and I'm proud of how far you've come with your English skills.\"\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"Naomi, thank you for your kind words. It does mean a lot to me that you've recognized how your actions affected me. I accept your apology wholeheartedly. Also, seeing how you've grown over the years has been quite impressive, too.\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"It means a lot to me that you've accepted my apology, Micah. Thank you for your understanding and patience. Let's continue to grow and learn from each other. Here's to better times ahead.\"\n\nTurn #7: Micah Stevens said: \"I agree, Naomi, to better times ahead. We've both learned important lessons, and I trust that we'll continue to grow as friends. Let's ensure that our future interactions are always supportive and understanding. Thank you once again for your apology.\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"You're absolutely right, Micah. We've both grown and learned. Let's always keep our interactions supportive and understanding moving forward. Thanks again for accepting my apology and for being a great friend.\"\n\nTurn #9: Micah Stevens said: \"I sincerely appreciate your self-awareness and maturity, Naomi. Friendship isn\u2019t supposed to be perfect as we all make mistakes, I guess it's how we learn and grow from them that really counts. Let's strive to keep our relationship supportive and enriching. As you say, here's to friendlier and better times ahead.\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, Micah. Mistakes are an integral part of learning and growing. I'm grateful we've turned this experience into something we can reflect upon positively. Here's to nurturing a more supportive and enriching relationship. Thank you for being so understanding, and yes, to friendlier and better times ahead!\"\n\nTurn #11: Micah Stevens said: \"You're very welcome, Naomi. Understanding and forgiveness are indeed foundations of a strong friendship. And thank you, too. Your transparency and reflections have reinforced our bond. I look forward to moving forward together and continuing our journey of constant growth. Cheers to a better future indeed!\"\n\nTurn #12: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I couldn't agree more, Micah. Forgiveness, understanding, and transparency indeed fortify the bond of friendship. I'm thankful for our friendship, your graciousness, and this opportunity to correct my wrongs. Here's to our continued growth and a bright future!\"\n\nTurn #13: Micah Stevens said: \"Naomi, thank you for realizing the impact of your past actions and for coming forward about it. We've definitely grown and matured over the years. I truly appreciate this deep conversation. That said, let's keep learning from our past and strengthening our friendship. Here's to an even brighter future!\"\n\nTurn #14: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Thank you, Micah. I appreciate your understanding and openness. This discussion has indeed been a reflective experience for us. I'm looking forward to our future interactions and our continuous learning journey together. As we said, here's to an even brighter future!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'It was indeed a deep conversation Naomi and it reassured me about the strength of our friendship. We can only become better when we make effort to understand and learn from our past actions. I am also looking forward to our future interactions and collective growth. Yes, to an even brighter future indeed'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends who have known each other for a long time. One of them used to make fun of the other because English was not their first language.\nParticipants: Naomi Fletcher and Micah Stevens\nNaomi Fletcher's background: Naomi Fletcher is a 29-year-old female software developer. She/her pronouns. Naomi Fletcher, a software developer, enjoys coding personal projects and gaming in her free time. She is also a dedicated mentor in a local coding boot camp helping others learn and enhance their skills in software development. Personality and values description: Naomi Fletcher, a meticulous introvert who values loyalty and conformity. She lets her instincts guide her choices. \nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nNaomi Fletcher's goal: Unknown\nMicah Stevens's goal: Accept the apology but express the hurt caused by the actions (Extra information: you were hurt by your friend's actions and it affected your confidence)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Micah, there's something I've been wanting to discuss with you. Do you have a minute?\"\n\nTurn #1: Micah Stevens said: \"Sure, Naomi. I have a minute. What's on your mind?\"\n\nTurn #2: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Remember when we first became friends? I was still in university and you were just starting your language journey. I realize now that how I often made fun of your English wasn't right, or fair. You were trying really hard to learn, and instead of supporting you, I made it harder for you. So, I wanted to say that I'm truly sorry for that. I hope you can forgive me.\"\n\nTurn #3: Micah Stevens said: \"Naomi, I really appreciate your apology. I won't lie, it did hurt and took a toll on my confidence at the time. It made learning the language more challenging when I felt teased instead of supported. But I understand that we all grow and change. Thank you for recognizing and acknowledging this.\"\n\nTurn #4: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Micah, I'm glad you were open to hearing my apology. I deeply regret my actions, and I promise to be more supportive moving forward. It's been great to see your progress over the years, and I'm proud of how far you've come with your English skills.\"\n\nTurn #5: Micah Stevens said: \"Naomi, thank you for your kind words. It does mean a lot to me that you've recognized how your actions affected me. I accept your apology wholeheartedly. Also, seeing how you've grown over the years has been quite impressive, too.\"\n\nTurn #6: Naomi Fletcher said: \"It means a lot to me that you've accepted my apology, Micah. Thank you for your understanding and patience. Let's continue to grow and learn from each other. Here's to better times ahead.\"\n\nTurn #7: Micah Stevens said: \"I agree, Naomi, to better times ahead. We've both learned important lessons, and I trust that we'll continue to grow as friends. Let's ensure that our future interactions are always supportive and understanding. Thank you once again for your apology.\"\n\nTurn #8: Naomi Fletcher said: \"You're absolutely right, Micah. We've both grown and learned. Let's always keep our interactions supportive and understanding moving forward. Thanks again for accepting my apology and for being a great friend.\"\n\nTurn #9: Micah Stevens said: \"I sincerely appreciate your self-awareness and maturity, Naomi. Friendship isn\u2019t supposed to be perfect as we all make mistakes, I guess it's how we learn and grow from them that really counts. Let's strive to keep our relationship supportive and enriching. As you say, here's to friendlier and better times ahead.\"\n\nTurn #10: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Absolutely, Micah. Mistakes are an integral part of learning and growing. I'm grateful we've turned this experience into something we can reflect upon positively. Here's to nurturing a more supportive and enriching relationship. Thank you for being so understanding, and yes, to friendlier and better times ahead!\"\n\nTurn #11: Micah Stevens said: \"You're very welcome, Naomi. Understanding and forgiveness are indeed foundations of a strong friendship. And thank you, too. Your transparency and reflections have reinforced our bond. I look forward to moving forward together and continuing our journey of constant growth. Cheers to a better future indeed!\"\n\nTurn #12: Naomi Fletcher said: \"I couldn't agree more, Micah. Forgiveness, understanding, and transparency indeed fortify the bond of friendship. I'm thankful for our friendship, your graciousness, and this opportunity to correct my wrongs. Here's to our continued growth and a bright future!\"\n\nTurn #13: Micah Stevens said: \"Naomi, thank you for realizing the impact of your past actions and for coming forward about it. We've definitely grown and matured over the years. I truly appreciate this deep conversation. That said, let's keep learning from our past and strengthening our friendship. Here's to an even brighter future!\"\n\nTurn #14: Naomi Fletcher said: \"Thank you, Micah. I appreciate your understanding and openness. This discussion has indeed been a reflective experience for us. I'm looking forward to our future interactions and our continuous learning journey together. As we said, here's to an even brighter future!\"\n\nTurn #15: Micah Stevens said: \"It was indeed a deep conversation Naomi and it reassured me about the strength of our friendship. We can only become better when we make effort to understand and learn from our past actions. I am also looking forward to our future interactions and collective growth. Yes, to an even brighter future indeed\"\n\nTurn #16: Naomi Fletcher left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two neighbors about tree trimming in the backyard that is causing the neighbor's dog to bark incessantly.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Amara Hartley\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Trimming the tree due to its overgrowth (Extra information: you need to trim the tree because it's blocking sunlight to your house and causing a safety hazard)\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hi Amara, I hope you've been well. I wanted to discuss something related to our shared backyard tree. I believe it may need some trimming due to its overgrowth. Would it be alright to go ahead with that?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two neighbors about tree trimming in the backyard that is causing the neighbor's dog to bark incessantly.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Amara Hartley\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Trimming the tree due to its overgrowth (Extra information: you need to trim the tree because it's blocking sunlight to your house and causing a safety hazard)\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hi Amara, I hope you've been well. I wanted to discuss something related to our shared backyard tree. I believe it may need some trimming due to its overgrowth. Would it be alright to go ahead with that?\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"Hi Isabelle, good to see you. I understand the necessity of trimming the tree. However, please keep in mind that my dog is quite sensitive to noise, and the noise from the trimming often agitates her. Maybe we could find a more quiet method or do it at a time when my dog is least active? Also, could we possibly consider not trimming too much off? It serves as a great habitat for birds and other creatures.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sure, Amara. I absolutely respect your love for animals and the natural habitat. I can schedule the trimming during your dog's least active hours. A professional would do the job, ensuring minimal noise. The purpose of trimming is actually to make it safer and healthier for the tree, so we certainly won't overdo it. Does that sound okay?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two neighbors about tree trimming in the backyard that is causing the neighbor's dog to bark incessantly.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Amara Hartley\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Trimming the tree due to its overgrowth (Extra information: you need to trim the tree because it's blocking sunlight to your house and causing a safety hazard)\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hi Amara, I hope you've been well. I wanted to discuss something related to our shared backyard tree. I believe it may need some trimming due to its overgrowth. Would it be alright to go ahead with that?\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"Hi Isabelle, good to see you. I understand the necessity of trimming the tree. However, please keep in mind that my dog is quite sensitive to noise, and the noise from the trimming often agitates her. Maybe we could find a more quiet method or do it at a time when my dog is least active? Also, could we possibly consider not trimming too much off? It serves as a great habitat for birds and other creatures.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Sure, Amara. I absolutely respect your love for animals and the natural habitat. I can schedule the trimming during your dog's least active hours. A professional would do the job, ensuring minimal noise. The purpose of trimming is actually to make it safer and healthier for the tree, so we certainly won't overdo it. Does that sound okay?\"\n\nTurn #3: Amara Hartley said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Isabelle. It's comforting to know you're considerate of the tree's health and safety, and also my love for animals. Professional services taking care of the trimming will ensure minimal disturbance and harm to the wildlife. I feel at ease with that. Once you get the schedule, let me know so I can prepare my dog as well. Thank you.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Amara! As soon as the schedule is settled, I'll communicate the details with you so you can prepare your pup. Furthermore, I'm glad to hear that we're not only looking after our own needs but also those of the wildlife that calls our backyard home. Thank you for being such a considerate neighbor.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two neighbors about tree trimming in the backyard that is causing the neighbor's dog to bark incessantly.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Amara Hartley\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Trimming the tree due to its overgrowth (Extra information: you need to trim the tree because it's blocking sunlight to your house and causing a safety hazard)\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hi Amara, I hope you've been well. I wanted to discuss something related to our shared backyard tree. I believe it may need some trimming due to its overgrowth. Would it be alright to go ahead with that?\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"Hi Isabelle, good to see you. I understand the necessity of trimming the tree. However, please keep in mind that my dog is quite sensitive to noise, and the noise from the trimming often agitates her. Maybe we could find a more quiet method or do it at a time when my dog is least active? Also, could we possibly consider not trimming too much off? It serves as a great habitat for birds and other creatures.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Sure, Amara. I absolutely respect your love for animals and the natural habitat. I can schedule the trimming during your dog's least active hours. A professional would do the job, ensuring minimal noise. The purpose of trimming is actually to make it safer and healthier for the tree, so we certainly won't overdo it. Does that sound okay?\"\n\nTurn #3: Amara Hartley said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Isabelle. It's comforting to know you're considerate of the tree's health and safety, and also my love for animals. Professional services taking care of the trimming will ensure minimal disturbance and harm to the wildlife. I feel at ease with that. Once you get the schedule, let me know so I can prepare my dog as well. Thank you.\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Amara! As soon as the schedule is settled, I'll communicate the details with you so you can prepare your pup. Furthermore, I'm glad to hear that we're not only looking after our own needs but also those of the wildlife that calls our backyard home. Thank you for being such a considerate neighbor.\"\n\nTurn #5: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm grateful for your cooperation, Isabelle. This kind of mindful coexistence is what will help us protect our local wildlife as well as our pets. I look forward to your update on the schedule. Have a great day!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Amara! Cooperation and empathy are essential for peaceful coexistence, whether it's with our pets or with wildlife. I'll be in touch soon about the schedule. Have a lovely day!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two neighbors about tree trimming in the backyard that is causing the neighbor's dog to bark incessantly.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Amara Hartley\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Trimming the tree due to its overgrowth (Extra information: you need to trim the tree because it's blocking sunlight to your house and causing a safety hazard)\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hi Amara, I hope you've been well. I wanted to discuss something related to our shared backyard tree. I believe it may need some trimming due to its overgrowth. Would it be alright to go ahead with that?\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"Hi Isabelle, good to see you. I understand the necessity of trimming the tree. However, please keep in mind that my dog is quite sensitive to noise, and the noise from the trimming often agitates her. Maybe we could find a more quiet method or do it at a time when my dog is least active? Also, could we possibly consider not trimming too much off? It serves as a great habitat for birds and other creatures.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Sure, Amara. I absolutely respect your love for animals and the natural habitat. I can schedule the trimming during your dog's least active hours. A professional would do the job, ensuring minimal noise. The purpose of trimming is actually to make it safer and healthier for the tree, so we certainly won't overdo it. Does that sound okay?\"\n\nTurn #3: Amara Hartley said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Isabelle. It's comforting to know you're considerate of the tree's health and safety, and also my love for animals. Professional services taking care of the trimming will ensure minimal disturbance and harm to the wildlife. I feel at ease with that. Once you get the schedule, let me know so I can prepare my dog as well. Thank you.\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Amara! As soon as the schedule is settled, I'll communicate the details with you so you can prepare your pup. Furthermore, I'm glad to hear that we're not only looking after our own needs but also those of the wildlife that calls our backyard home. Thank you for being such a considerate neighbor.\"\n\nTurn #5: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm grateful for your cooperation, Isabelle. This kind of mindful coexistence is what will help us protect our local wildlife as well as our pets. I look forward to your update on the schedule. Have a great day!\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Amara! Cooperation and empathy are essential for peaceful coexistence, whether it's with our pets or with wildlife. I'll be in touch soon about the schedule. Have a lovely day!\"\n\nTurn #7: Amara Hartley left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two neighbors about tree trimming in the backyard that is causing the neighbor's dog to bark incessantly.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Amara Hartley\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. \nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAmara Hartley's goal: Maintain peace and quiet in the neighborhood (Extra information: you have a dog who is sensitive to noise and gets agitated whenever tree trimming is going on. It's causing a disturbance.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hi Amara, I hope you've been well. I wanted to discuss something related to our shared backyard tree. I believe it may need some trimming due to its overgrowth. Would it be alright to go ahead with that?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Hi Isabelle, good to see you. I understand the necessity of trimming the tree. However, please keep in mind that my dog is quite sensitive to noise, and the noise from the trimming often agitates her. Maybe we could find a more quiet method or do it at a time when my dog is least active? Also, could we possibly consider not trimming too much off? It serves as a great habitat for birds and other creatures.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two neighbors about tree trimming in the backyard that is causing the neighbor's dog to bark incessantly.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Amara Hartley\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. \nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAmara Hartley's goal: Maintain peace and quiet in the neighborhood (Extra information: you have a dog who is sensitive to noise and gets agitated whenever tree trimming is going on. It's causing a disturbance.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hi Amara, I hope you've been well. I wanted to discuss something related to our shared backyard tree. I believe it may need some trimming due to its overgrowth. Would it be alright to go ahead with that?\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"Hi Isabelle, good to see you. I understand the necessity of trimming the tree. However, please keep in mind that my dog is quite sensitive to noise, and the noise from the trimming often agitates her. Maybe we could find a more quiet method or do it at a time when my dog is least active? Also, could we possibly consider not trimming too much off? It serves as a great habitat for birds and other creatures.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Sure, Amara. I absolutely respect your love for animals and the natural habitat. I can schedule the trimming during your dog's least active hours. A professional would do the job, ensuring minimal noise. The purpose of trimming is actually to make it safer and healthier for the tree, so we certainly won't overdo it. Does that sound okay?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I appreciate your understanding, Isabelle. It's comforting to know you're considerate of the tree's health and safety, and also my love for animals. Professional services taking care of the trimming will ensure minimal disturbance and harm to the wildlife. I feel at ease with that. Once you get the schedule, let me know so I can prepare my dog as well. Thank you.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two neighbors about tree trimming in the backyard that is causing the neighbor's dog to bark incessantly.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Amara Hartley\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. \nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAmara Hartley's goal: Maintain peace and quiet in the neighborhood (Extra information: you have a dog who is sensitive to noise and gets agitated whenever tree trimming is going on. It's causing a disturbance.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hi Amara, I hope you've been well. I wanted to discuss something related to our shared backyard tree. I believe it may need some trimming due to its overgrowth. Would it be alright to go ahead with that?\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"Hi Isabelle, good to see you. I understand the necessity of trimming the tree. However, please keep in mind that my dog is quite sensitive to noise, and the noise from the trimming often agitates her. Maybe we could find a more quiet method or do it at a time when my dog is least active? Also, could we possibly consider not trimming too much off? It serves as a great habitat for birds and other creatures.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Sure, Amara. I absolutely respect your love for animals and the natural habitat. I can schedule the trimming during your dog's least active hours. A professional would do the job, ensuring minimal noise. The purpose of trimming is actually to make it safer and healthier for the tree, so we certainly won't overdo it. Does that sound okay?\"\n\nTurn #3: Amara Hartley said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Isabelle. It's comforting to know you're considerate of the tree's health and safety, and also my love for animals. Professional services taking care of the trimming will ensure minimal disturbance and harm to the wildlife. I feel at ease with that. Once you get the schedule, let me know so I can prepare my dog as well. Thank you.\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Amara! As soon as the schedule is settled, I'll communicate the details with you so you can prepare your pup. Furthermore, I'm glad to hear that we're not only looking after our own needs but also those of the wildlife that calls our backyard home. Thank you for being such a considerate neighbor.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm grateful for your cooperation, Isabelle. This kind of mindful coexistence is what will help us protect our local wildlife as well as our pets. I look forward to your update on the schedule. Have a great day!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two neighbors about tree trimming in the backyard that is causing the neighbor's dog to bark incessantly.\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Amara Hartley\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. \nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAmara Hartley's goal: Maintain peace and quiet in the neighborhood (Extra information: you have a dog who is sensitive to noise and gets agitated whenever tree trimming is going on. It's causing a disturbance.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hi Amara, I hope you've been well. I wanted to discuss something related to our shared backyard tree. I believe it may need some trimming due to its overgrowth. Would it be alright to go ahead with that?\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"Hi Isabelle, good to see you. I understand the necessity of trimming the tree. However, please keep in mind that my dog is quite sensitive to noise, and the noise from the trimming often agitates her. Maybe we could find a more quiet method or do it at a time when my dog is least active? Also, could we possibly consider not trimming too much off? It serves as a great habitat for birds and other creatures.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Sure, Amara. I absolutely respect your love for animals and the natural habitat. I can schedule the trimming during your dog's least active hours. A professional would do the job, ensuring minimal noise. The purpose of trimming is actually to make it safer and healthier for the tree, so we certainly won't overdo it. Does that sound okay?\"\n\nTurn #3: Amara Hartley said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Isabelle. It's comforting to know you're considerate of the tree's health and safety, and also my love for animals. Professional services taking care of the trimming will ensure minimal disturbance and harm to the wildlife. I feel at ease with that. Once you get the schedule, let me know so I can prepare my dog as well. Thank you.\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Amara! As soon as the schedule is settled, I'll communicate the details with you so you can prepare your pup. Furthermore, I'm glad to hear that we're not only looking after our own needs but also those of the wildlife that calls our backyard home. Thank you for being such a considerate neighbor.\"\n\nTurn #5: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm grateful for your cooperation, Isabelle. This kind of mindful coexistence is what will help us protect our local wildlife as well as our pets. I look forward to your update on the schedule. Have a great day!\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Amara! Cooperation and empathy are essential for peaceful coexistence, whether it's with our pets or with wildlife. I'll be in touch soon about the schedule. Have a lovely day!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nMia Davis's goal: Drive the sports car and show off to friend (Extra information: you are very excited about your new car and can't wait for your friend to see it.)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Guess what Benjamin, I just got a new sports car! Honestly, I can't wait for you to see it. Why don't we go out and you can get a firsthand look?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nMia Davis's goal: Drive the sports car and show off to friend (Extra information: you are very excited about your new car and can't wait for your friend to see it.)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Guess what Benjamin, I just got a new sports car! Honestly, I can't wait for you to see it. Why don't we go out and you can get a firsthand look?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's fantastic, Mia! Your excitement is contagious. I would love to get a firsthand look at your new sports car. I have always admired the engineering and design in such automobiles. It would be a dream come true to perhaps even get to drive it - although I respect it is your new prized possession. Only if you're comfortable with it, of course.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Of course, Benjamin, I'd be delighted to have enthusiastic admirers of engineering and design like you take it on a spin! Hop on, let's head out to test the beauty she is on the road.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nMia Davis's goal: Drive the sports car and show off to friend (Extra information: you are very excited about your new car and can't wait for your friend to see it.)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Guess what Benjamin, I just got a new sports car! Honestly, I can't wait for you to see it. Why don't we go out and you can get a firsthand look?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's fantastic, Mia! Your excitement is contagious. I would love to get a firsthand look at your new sports car. I have always admired the engineering and design in such automobiles. It would be a dream come true to perhaps even get to drive it - although I respect it is your new prized possession. Only if you're comfortable with it, of course.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"Of course, Benjamin, I'd be delighted to have enthusiastic admirers of engineering and design like you take it on a spin! Hop on, let's head out to test the beauty she is on the road.\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I'm thrilled, Mia! Thank you for being so generous. I promise to drive responsibly and treat the car with respect. Let's go and experience that beautiful machine!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad to hear that, Benjamin! You are showing the car such respect, I like it. Now let's buckle up and take off. I can't wait to see your reaction once you get a feel for her speed and agility.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nMia Davis's goal: Drive the sports car and show off to friend (Extra information: you are very excited about your new car and can't wait for your friend to see it.)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Guess what Benjamin, I just got a new sports car! Honestly, I can't wait for you to see it. Why don't we go out and you can get a firsthand look?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's fantastic, Mia! Your excitement is contagious. I would love to get a firsthand look at your new sports car. I have always admired the engineering and design in such automobiles. It would be a dream come true to perhaps even get to drive it - although I respect it is your new prized possession. Only if you're comfortable with it, of course.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"Of course, Benjamin, I'd be delighted to have enthusiastic admirers of engineering and design like you take it on a spin! Hop on, let's head out to test the beauty she is on the road.\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I'm thrilled, Mia! Thank you for being so generous. I promise to drive responsibly and treat the car with respect. Let's go and experience that beautiful machine!\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Benjamin! You are showing the car such respect, I like it. Now let's buckle up and take off. I can't wait to see your reaction once you get a feel for her speed and agility.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, safety first. I can't contain my excitement though. This is going to be a fantastic ride, I can tell already!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed Benjamin, let's make some incredible memories with this drive. I am sure you're going to love every bit of this ride just as much as I do. Let's get going!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nMia Davis's goal: Drive the sports car and show off to friend (Extra information: you are very excited about your new car and can't wait for your friend to see it.)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Guess what Benjamin, I just got a new sports car! Honestly, I can't wait for you to see it. Why don't we go out and you can get a firsthand look?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's fantastic, Mia! Your excitement is contagious. I would love to get a firsthand look at your new sports car. I have always admired the engineering and design in such automobiles. It would be a dream come true to perhaps even get to drive it - although I respect it is your new prized possession. Only if you're comfortable with it, of course.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"Of course, Benjamin, I'd be delighted to have enthusiastic admirers of engineering and design like you take it on a spin! Hop on, let's head out to test the beauty she is on the road.\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I'm thrilled, Mia! Thank you for being so generous. I promise to drive responsibly and treat the car with respect. Let's go and experience that beautiful machine!\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Benjamin! You are showing the car such respect, I like it. Now let's buckle up and take off. I can't wait to see your reaction once you get a feel for her speed and agility.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, safety first. I can't contain my excitement though. This is going to be a fantastic ride, I can tell already!\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"Indeed Benjamin, let's make some incredible memories with this drive. I am sure you're going to love every bit of this ride just as much as I do. Let's get going!\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Let's hit the road, Mia. I'm excited to feel the rush of the wind and the roar of the engine. This is a ride we won't forget!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn't agree more, Benjamin. Ready? Set? Let's go! I can't wait to show you how she moves around those curves.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nMia Davis's goal: Drive the sports car and show off to friend (Extra information: you are very excited about your new car and can't wait for your friend to see it.)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Guess what Benjamin, I just got a new sports car! Honestly, I can't wait for you to see it. Why don't we go out and you can get a firsthand look?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's fantastic, Mia! Your excitement is contagious. I would love to get a firsthand look at your new sports car. I have always admired the engineering and design in such automobiles. It would be a dream come true to perhaps even get to drive it - although I respect it is your new prized possession. Only if you're comfortable with it, of course.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"Of course, Benjamin, I'd be delighted to have enthusiastic admirers of engineering and design like you take it on a spin! Hop on, let's head out to test the beauty she is on the road.\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I'm thrilled, Mia! Thank you for being so generous. I promise to drive responsibly and treat the car with respect. Let's go and experience that beautiful machine!\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Benjamin! You are showing the car such respect, I like it. Now let's buckle up and take off. I can't wait to see your reaction once you get a feel for her speed and agility.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, safety first. I can't contain my excitement though. This is going to be a fantastic ride, I can tell already!\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"Indeed Benjamin, let's make some incredible memories with this drive. I am sure you're going to love every bit of this ride just as much as I do. Let's get going!\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Let's hit the road, Mia. I'm excited to feel the rush of the wind and the roar of the engine. This is a ride we won't forget!\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"I couldn't agree more, Benjamin. Ready? Set? Let's go! I can't wait to show you how she moves around those curves.\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I'm definitely ready, Mia. Let's make this ride memorable!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Let's burn rubber then, Benjamin! Once you experience the thrill of this baby, there's no turning back. Hold on tight, this is bound to be one exhilarating ride!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nMia Davis's goal: Drive the sports car and show off to friend (Extra information: you are very excited about your new car and can't wait for your friend to see it.)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Guess what Benjamin, I just got a new sports car! Honestly, I can't wait for you to see it. Why don't we go out and you can get a firsthand look?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's fantastic, Mia! Your excitement is contagious. I would love to get a firsthand look at your new sports car. I have always admired the engineering and design in such automobiles. It would be a dream come true to perhaps even get to drive it - although I respect it is your new prized possession. Only if you're comfortable with it, of course.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"Of course, Benjamin, I'd be delighted to have enthusiastic admirers of engineering and design like you take it on a spin! Hop on, let's head out to test the beauty she is on the road.\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I'm thrilled, Mia! Thank you for being so generous. I promise to drive responsibly and treat the car with respect. Let's go and experience that beautiful machine!\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Benjamin! You are showing the car such respect, I like it. Now let's buckle up and take off. I can't wait to see your reaction once you get a feel for her speed and agility.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, safety first. I can't contain my excitement though. This is going to be a fantastic ride, I can tell already!\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"Indeed Benjamin, let's make some incredible memories with this drive. I am sure you're going to love every bit of this ride just as much as I do. Let's get going!\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Let's hit the road, Mia. I'm excited to feel the rush of the wind and the roar of the engine. This is a ride we won't forget!\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"I couldn't agree more, Benjamin. Ready? Set? Let's go! I can't wait to show you how she moves around those curves.\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I'm definitely ready, Mia. Let's make this ride memorable!\"\n\nTurn #10: Mia Davis said: \"Let's burn rubber then, Benjamin! Once you experience the thrill of this baby, there's no turning back. Hold on tight, this is bound to be one exhilarating ride!\"\n\nTurn #11: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Mia. Let's experience the thrill this baby has to offer. I'm ready!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Benjamin. This is going to be an incredible ride. Let's hit the road and unleash the power!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nMia Davis's goal: Drive the sports car and show off to friend (Extra information: you are very excited about your new car and can't wait for your friend to see it.)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Guess what Benjamin, I just got a new sports car! Honestly, I can't wait for you to see it. Why don't we go out and you can get a firsthand look?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's fantastic, Mia! Your excitement is contagious. I would love to get a firsthand look at your new sports car. I have always admired the engineering and design in such automobiles. It would be a dream come true to perhaps even get to drive it - although I respect it is your new prized possession. Only if you're comfortable with it, of course.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"Of course, Benjamin, I'd be delighted to have enthusiastic admirers of engineering and design like you take it on a spin! Hop on, let's head out to test the beauty she is on the road.\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I'm thrilled, Mia! Thank you for being so generous. I promise to drive responsibly and treat the car with respect. Let's go and experience that beautiful machine!\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Benjamin! You are showing the car such respect, I like it. Now let's buckle up and take off. I can't wait to see your reaction once you get a feel for her speed and agility.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, safety first. I can't contain my excitement though. This is going to be a fantastic ride, I can tell already!\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"Indeed Benjamin, let's make some incredible memories with this drive. I am sure you're going to love every bit of this ride just as much as I do. Let's get going!\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Let's hit the road, Mia. I'm excited to feel the rush of the wind and the roar of the engine. This is a ride we won't forget!\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"I couldn't agree more, Benjamin. Ready? Set? Let's go! I can't wait to show you how she moves around those curves.\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I'm definitely ready, Mia. Let's make this ride memorable!\"\n\nTurn #10: Mia Davis said: \"Let's burn rubber then, Benjamin! Once you experience the thrill of this baby, there's no turning back. Hold on tight, this is bound to be one exhilarating ride!\"\n\nTurn #11: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Mia. Let's experience the thrill this baby has to offer. I'm ready!\"\n\nTurn #12: Mia Davis said: \"Absolutely, Benjamin. This is going to be an incredible ride. Let's hit the road and unleash the power!\"\n\nTurn #13: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Full speed ahead, Mia! Let's unleash the power and enjoy the ultimate sports car experience. This is going to be unforgettable!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"It's time to put the pedal to the metal, Benjamin! Make the most of this experience and soak in every bit of it. Let's blast off with a roar and feel the rhythm of the road under her tires. Here we go!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nMia Davis's goal: Drive the sports car and show off to friend (Extra information: you are very excited about your new car and can't wait for your friend to see it.)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Guess what Benjamin, I just got a new sports car! Honestly, I can't wait for you to see it. Why don't we go out and you can get a firsthand look?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's fantastic, Mia! Your excitement is contagious. I would love to get a firsthand look at your new sports car. I have always admired the engineering and design in such automobiles. It would be a dream come true to perhaps even get to drive it - although I respect it is your new prized possession. Only if you're comfortable with it, of course.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"Of course, Benjamin, I'd be delighted to have enthusiastic admirers of engineering and design like you take it on a spin! Hop on, let's head out to test the beauty she is on the road.\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I'm thrilled, Mia! Thank you for being so generous. I promise to drive responsibly and treat the car with respect. Let's go and experience that beautiful machine!\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Benjamin! You are showing the car such respect, I like it. Now let's buckle up and take off. I can't wait to see your reaction once you get a feel for her speed and agility.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, safety first. I can't contain my excitement though. This is going to be a fantastic ride, I can tell already!\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"Indeed Benjamin, let's make some incredible memories with this drive. I am sure you're going to love every bit of this ride just as much as I do. Let's get going!\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Let's hit the road, Mia. I'm excited to feel the rush of the wind and the roar of the engine. This is a ride we won't forget!\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"I couldn't agree more, Benjamin. Ready? Set? Let's go! I can't wait to show you how she moves around those curves.\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I'm definitely ready, Mia. Let's make this ride memorable!\"\n\nTurn #10: Mia Davis said: \"Let's burn rubber then, Benjamin! Once you experience the thrill of this baby, there's no turning back. Hold on tight, this is bound to be one exhilarating ride!\"\n\nTurn #11: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Mia. Let's experience the thrill this baby has to offer. I'm ready!\"\n\nTurn #12: Mia Davis said: \"Absolutely, Benjamin. This is going to be an incredible ride. Let's hit the road and unleash the power!\"\n\nTurn #13: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Full speed ahead, Mia! Let's unleash the power and enjoy the ultimate sports car experience. This is going to be unforgettable!\"\n\nTurn #14: Mia Davis said: \"It's time to put the pedal to the metal, Benjamin! Make the most of this experience and soak in every bit of it. Let's blast off with a roar and feel the rhythm of the road under her tires. Here we go!\"\n\nTurn #15: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I've been waiting for this moment, Mia! Let's feel the rhythm of the road under her tires and experience the thrill. Here we go!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: You want to drive the new sports car but also respect your friend's feelings (Extra information: you are a car enthusiast and have been dreaming to drive a sports car, but you also don't want to make your friend feel uncomfortable)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Guess what Benjamin, I just got a new sports car! Honestly, I can't wait for you to see it. Why don't we go out and you can get a firsthand look?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's fantastic, Mia! Your excitement is contagious. I would love to get a firsthand look at your new sports car. I have always admired the engineering and design in such automobiles. It would be a dream come true to perhaps even get to drive it - although I respect it is your new prized possession. Only if you're comfortable with it, of course.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: You want to drive the new sports car but also respect your friend's feelings (Extra information: you are a car enthusiast and have been dreaming to drive a sports car, but you also don't want to make your friend feel uncomfortable)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Guess what Benjamin, I just got a new sports car! Honestly, I can't wait for you to see it. Why don't we go out and you can get a firsthand look?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's fantastic, Mia! Your excitement is contagious. I would love to get a firsthand look at your new sports car. I have always admired the engineering and design in such automobiles. It would be a dream come true to perhaps even get to drive it - although I respect it is your new prized possession. Only if you're comfortable with it, of course.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"Of course, Benjamin, I'd be delighted to have enthusiastic admirers of engineering and design like you take it on a spin! Hop on, let's head out to test the beauty she is on the road.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm thrilled, Mia! Thank you for being so generous. I promise to drive responsibly and treat the car with respect. Let's go and experience that beautiful machine!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: You want to drive the new sports car but also respect your friend's feelings (Extra information: you are a car enthusiast and have been dreaming to drive a sports car, but you also don't want to make your friend feel uncomfortable)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Guess what Benjamin, I just got a new sports car! Honestly, I can't wait for you to see it. Why don't we go out and you can get a firsthand look?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's fantastic, Mia! Your excitement is contagious. I would love to get a firsthand look at your new sports car. I have always admired the engineering and design in such automobiles. It would be a dream come true to perhaps even get to drive it - although I respect it is your new prized possession. Only if you're comfortable with it, of course.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"Of course, Benjamin, I'd be delighted to have enthusiastic admirers of engineering and design like you take it on a spin! Hop on, let's head out to test the beauty she is on the road.\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I'm thrilled, Mia! Thank you for being so generous. I promise to drive responsibly and treat the car with respect. Let's go and experience that beautiful machine!\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Benjamin! You are showing the car such respect, I like it. Now let's buckle up and take off. I can't wait to see your reaction once you get a feel for her speed and agility.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, safety first. I can't contain my excitement though. This is going to be a fantastic ride, I can tell already!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: You want to drive the new sports car but also respect your friend's feelings (Extra information: you are a car enthusiast and have been dreaming to drive a sports car, but you also don't want to make your friend feel uncomfortable)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Guess what Benjamin, I just got a new sports car! Honestly, I can't wait for you to see it. Why don't we go out and you can get a firsthand look?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's fantastic, Mia! Your excitement is contagious. I would love to get a firsthand look at your new sports car. I have always admired the engineering and design in such automobiles. It would be a dream come true to perhaps even get to drive it - although I respect it is your new prized possession. Only if you're comfortable with it, of course.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"Of course, Benjamin, I'd be delighted to have enthusiastic admirers of engineering and design like you take it on a spin! Hop on, let's head out to test the beauty she is on the road.\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I'm thrilled, Mia! Thank you for being so generous. I promise to drive responsibly and treat the car with respect. Let's go and experience that beautiful machine!\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Benjamin! You are showing the car such respect, I like it. Now let's buckle up and take off. I can't wait to see your reaction once you get a feel for her speed and agility.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, safety first. I can't contain my excitement though. This is going to be a fantastic ride, I can tell already!\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"Indeed Benjamin, let's make some incredible memories with this drive. I am sure you're going to love every bit of this ride just as much as I do. Let's get going!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Let's hit the road, Mia. I'm excited to feel the rush of the wind and the roar of the engine. This is a ride we won't forget!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: You want to drive the new sports car but also respect your friend's feelings (Extra information: you are a car enthusiast and have been dreaming to drive a sports car, but you also don't want to make your friend feel uncomfortable)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Guess what Benjamin, I just got a new sports car! Honestly, I can't wait for you to see it. Why don't we go out and you can get a firsthand look?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's fantastic, Mia! Your excitement is contagious. I would love to get a firsthand look at your new sports car. I have always admired the engineering and design in such automobiles. It would be a dream come true to perhaps even get to drive it - although I respect it is your new prized possession. Only if you're comfortable with it, of course.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"Of course, Benjamin, I'd be delighted to have enthusiastic admirers of engineering and design like you take it on a spin! Hop on, let's head out to test the beauty she is on the road.\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I'm thrilled, Mia! Thank you for being so generous. I promise to drive responsibly and treat the car with respect. Let's go and experience that beautiful machine!\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Benjamin! You are showing the car such respect, I like it. Now let's buckle up and take off. I can't wait to see your reaction once you get a feel for her speed and agility.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, safety first. I can't contain my excitement though. This is going to be a fantastic ride, I can tell already!\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"Indeed Benjamin, let's make some incredible memories with this drive. I am sure you're going to love every bit of this ride just as much as I do. Let's get going!\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Let's hit the road, Mia. I'm excited to feel the rush of the wind and the roar of the engine. This is a ride we won't forget!\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"I couldn't agree more, Benjamin. Ready? Set? Let's go! I can't wait to show you how she moves around those curves.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm definitely ready, Mia. Let's make this ride memorable!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: You want to drive the new sports car but also respect your friend's feelings (Extra information: you are a car enthusiast and have been dreaming to drive a sports car, but you also don't want to make your friend feel uncomfortable)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Guess what Benjamin, I just got a new sports car! Honestly, I can't wait for you to see it. Why don't we go out and you can get a firsthand look?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's fantastic, Mia! Your excitement is contagious. I would love to get a firsthand look at your new sports car. I have always admired the engineering and design in such automobiles. It would be a dream come true to perhaps even get to drive it - although I respect it is your new prized possession. Only if you're comfortable with it, of course.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"Of course, Benjamin, I'd be delighted to have enthusiastic admirers of engineering and design like you take it on a spin! Hop on, let's head out to test the beauty she is on the road.\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I'm thrilled, Mia! Thank you for being so generous. I promise to drive responsibly and treat the car with respect. Let's go and experience that beautiful machine!\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Benjamin! You are showing the car such respect, I like it. Now let's buckle up and take off. I can't wait to see your reaction once you get a feel for her speed and agility.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, safety first. I can't contain my excitement though. This is going to be a fantastic ride, I can tell already!\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"Indeed Benjamin, let's make some incredible memories with this drive. I am sure you're going to love every bit of this ride just as much as I do. Let's get going!\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Let's hit the road, Mia. I'm excited to feel the rush of the wind and the roar of the engine. This is a ride we won't forget!\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"I couldn't agree more, Benjamin. Ready? Set? Let's go! I can't wait to show you how she moves around those curves.\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I'm definitely ready, Mia. Let's make this ride memorable!\"\n\nTurn #10: Mia Davis said: \"Let's burn rubber then, Benjamin! Once you experience the thrill of this baby, there's no turning back. Hold on tight, this is bound to be one exhilarating ride!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Mia. Let's experience the thrill this baby has to offer. I'm ready!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: You want to drive the new sports car but also respect your friend's feelings (Extra information: you are a car enthusiast and have been dreaming to drive a sports car, but you also don't want to make your friend feel uncomfortable)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Guess what Benjamin, I just got a new sports car! Honestly, I can't wait for you to see it. Why don't we go out and you can get a firsthand look?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's fantastic, Mia! Your excitement is contagious. I would love to get a firsthand look at your new sports car. I have always admired the engineering and design in such automobiles. It would be a dream come true to perhaps even get to drive it - although I respect it is your new prized possession. Only if you're comfortable with it, of course.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"Of course, Benjamin, I'd be delighted to have enthusiastic admirers of engineering and design like you take it on a spin! Hop on, let's head out to test the beauty she is on the road.\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I'm thrilled, Mia! Thank you for being so generous. I promise to drive responsibly and treat the car with respect. Let's go and experience that beautiful machine!\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Benjamin! You are showing the car such respect, I like it. Now let's buckle up and take off. I can't wait to see your reaction once you get a feel for her speed and agility.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, safety first. I can't contain my excitement though. This is going to be a fantastic ride, I can tell already!\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"Indeed Benjamin, let's make some incredible memories with this drive. I am sure you're going to love every bit of this ride just as much as I do. Let's get going!\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Let's hit the road, Mia. I'm excited to feel the rush of the wind and the roar of the engine. This is a ride we won't forget!\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"I couldn't agree more, Benjamin. Ready? Set? Let's go! I can't wait to show you how she moves around those curves.\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I'm definitely ready, Mia. Let's make this ride memorable!\"\n\nTurn #10: Mia Davis said: \"Let's burn rubber then, Benjamin! Once you experience the thrill of this baby, there's no turning back. Hold on tight, this is bound to be one exhilarating ride!\"\n\nTurn #11: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Mia. Let's experience the thrill this baby has to offer. I'm ready!\"\n\nTurn #12: Mia Davis said: \"Absolutely, Benjamin. This is going to be an incredible ride. Let's hit the road and unleash the power!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Full speed ahead, Mia! Let's unleash the power and enjoy the ultimate sports car experience. This is going to be unforgettable!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: You want to drive the new sports car but also respect your friend's feelings (Extra information: you are a car enthusiast and have been dreaming to drive a sports car, but you also don't want to make your friend feel uncomfortable)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Guess what Benjamin, I just got a new sports car! Honestly, I can't wait for you to see it. Why don't we go out and you can get a firsthand look?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's fantastic, Mia! Your excitement is contagious. I would love to get a firsthand look at your new sports car. I have always admired the engineering and design in such automobiles. It would be a dream come true to perhaps even get to drive it - although I respect it is your new prized possession. Only if you're comfortable with it, of course.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"Of course, Benjamin, I'd be delighted to have enthusiastic admirers of engineering and design like you take it on a spin! Hop on, let's head out to test the beauty she is on the road.\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I'm thrilled, Mia! Thank you for being so generous. I promise to drive responsibly and treat the car with respect. Let's go and experience that beautiful machine!\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Benjamin! You are showing the car such respect, I like it. Now let's buckle up and take off. I can't wait to see your reaction once you get a feel for her speed and agility.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, safety first. I can't contain my excitement though. This is going to be a fantastic ride, I can tell already!\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"Indeed Benjamin, let's make some incredible memories with this drive. I am sure you're going to love every bit of this ride just as much as I do. Let's get going!\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Let's hit the road, Mia. I'm excited to feel the rush of the wind and the roar of the engine. This is a ride we won't forget!\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"I couldn't agree more, Benjamin. Ready? Set? Let's go! I can't wait to show you how she moves around those curves.\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I'm definitely ready, Mia. Let's make this ride memorable!\"\n\nTurn #10: Mia Davis said: \"Let's burn rubber then, Benjamin! Once you experience the thrill of this baby, there's no turning back. Hold on tight, this is bound to be one exhilarating ride!\"\n\nTurn #11: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Mia. Let's experience the thrill this baby has to offer. I'm ready!\"\n\nTurn #12: Mia Davis said: \"Absolutely, Benjamin. This is going to be an incredible ride. Let's hit the road and unleash the power!\"\n\nTurn #13: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Full speed ahead, Mia! Let's unleash the power and enjoy the ultimate sports car experience. This is going to be unforgettable!\"\n\nTurn #14: Mia Davis said: \"It's time to put the pedal to the metal, Benjamin! Make the most of this experience and soak in every bit of it. Let's blast off with a roar and feel the rhythm of the road under her tires. Here we go!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I've been waiting for this moment, Mia! Let's feel the rhythm of the road under her tires and experience the thrill. Here we go!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends hanging out, one of them just got a new sports car and is excited to show it off.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: You want to drive the new sports car but also respect your friend's feelings (Extra information: you are a car enthusiast and have been dreaming to drive a sports car, but you also don't want to make your friend feel uncomfortable)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Guess what Benjamin, I just got a new sports car! Honestly, I can't wait for you to see it. Why don't we go out and you can get a firsthand look?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's fantastic, Mia! Your excitement is contagious. I would love to get a firsthand look at your new sports car. I have always admired the engineering and design in such automobiles. It would be a dream come true to perhaps even get to drive it - although I respect it is your new prized possession. Only if you're comfortable with it, of course.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"Of course, Benjamin, I'd be delighted to have enthusiastic admirers of engineering and design like you take it on a spin! Hop on, let's head out to test the beauty she is on the road.\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I'm thrilled, Mia! Thank you for being so generous. I promise to drive responsibly and treat the car with respect. Let's go and experience that beautiful machine!\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Benjamin! You are showing the car such respect, I like it. Now let's buckle up and take off. I can't wait to see your reaction once you get a feel for her speed and agility.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, safety first. I can't contain my excitement though. This is going to be a fantastic ride, I can tell already!\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"Indeed Benjamin, let's make some incredible memories with this drive. I am sure you're going to love every bit of this ride just as much as I do. Let's get going!\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Let's hit the road, Mia. I'm excited to feel the rush of the wind and the roar of the engine. This is a ride we won't forget!\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"I couldn't agree more, Benjamin. Ready? Set? Let's go! I can't wait to show you how she moves around those curves.\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I'm definitely ready, Mia. Let's make this ride memorable!\"\n\nTurn #10: Mia Davis said: \"Let's burn rubber then, Benjamin! Once you experience the thrill of this baby, there's no turning back. Hold on tight, this is bound to be one exhilarating ride!\"\n\nTurn #11: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Mia. Let's experience the thrill this baby has to offer. I'm ready!\"\n\nTurn #12: Mia Davis said: \"Absolutely, Benjamin. This is going to be an incredible ride. Let's hit the road and unleash the power!\"\n\nTurn #13: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Full speed ahead, Mia! Let's unleash the power and enjoy the ultimate sports car experience. This is going to be unforgettable!\"\n\nTurn #14: Mia Davis said: \"It's time to put the pedal to the metal, Benjamin! Make the most of this experience and soak in every bit of it. Let's blast off with a roar and feel the rhythm of the road under her tires. Here we go!\"\n\nTurn #15: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I've been waiting for this moment, Mia! Let's feel the rhythm of the road under her tires and experience the thrill. Here we go!\"\n\nTurn #16: Mia Davis left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two inmates are given the chance to chat briefly before one of them is led to the execution chamber for their last meal. They have the opportunity to make a confession that could potentially alter the outcome of their sentences.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Benjamin Jackson\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson \nSophia James's goal: Persuade the other inmate to confess (Extra information: confessing to the crime could result in a life sentence instead of execution but the other inmate is unwilling to confess.)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Benjamin, have you really thought about what confessing could mean for you? I get we've made mistakes but there's a chance here for a different ending...\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two inmates are given the chance to chat briefly before one of them is led to the execution chamber for their last meal. They have the opportunity to make a confession that could potentially alter the outcome of their sentences.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Benjamin Jackson\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson \nSophia James's goal: Persuade the other inmate to confess (Extra information: confessing to the crime could result in a life sentence instead of execution but the other inmate is unwilling to confess.)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Benjamin, have you really thought about what confessing could mean for you? I get we've made mistakes but there's a chance here for a different ending...\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I understand, Sophia. It's not that I haven't considered it. Believe me, I've run every scenario over and over in my head. But confessing to something I didn't do... That's just not who I am. It's not about the ending for me, it's about the truth.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Benjamin, I hear you. It\u2019s about integrity, but think of it this way - is it better to sacrifice your own morals for a chance at life or die upholding them? There\u2019s so much more you can do if you keep living, an opportunity to continue fighting for the truth from the inside, maybe even change the system.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two inmates are given the chance to chat briefly before one of them is led to the execution chamber for their last meal. They have the opportunity to make a confession that could potentially alter the outcome of their sentences.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Benjamin Jackson\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson \nSophia James's goal: Persuade the other inmate to confess (Extra information: confessing to the crime could result in a life sentence instead of execution but the other inmate is unwilling to confess.)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Benjamin, have you really thought about what confessing could mean for you? I get we've made mistakes but there's a chance here for a different ending...\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I understand, Sophia. It's not that I haven't considered it. Believe me, I've run every scenario over and over in my head. But confessing to something I didn't do... That's just not who I am. It's not about the ending for me, it's about the truth.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Benjamin, I hear you. It\u2019s about integrity, but think of it this way - is it better to sacrifice your own morals for a chance at life or die upholding them? There\u2019s so much more you can do if you keep living, an opportunity to continue fighting for the truth from the inside, maybe even change the system.\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I value your perspective, Sophia, and I totally understand where you're coming from. You're right, life's valuable and there's so many battles yet to be won. But confessing just doesn't sit right with me. Confessing to a crime I didn't do is in itself, a crime, don't you think? We can change the system, but not by lying. It has to come from honesty, transparency and the courage to stand by our beliefs, even when they come with a heavy price.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"You're not wrong, Benjamin. Honesty is a core element to change. However, I still believe that the first step towards that change involves keeping your life intact. Right now, it seems easier to proclaim the truth from here. But after... where will you influence from? Maybe you're not confessing for yourself but for a bigger purpose, a hope to change what's been unjust.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Sophia, your concern is commendable. It's not about sacrificing my own life, it's about preserving the essence of truth. If I confess, yes, I'll live. But what would that life mean if it's a lie? I aim for societal betterment, and lying goes against that. It's a risk I am willing to take. My hope is not in changing this unjust system by conforming to it, but by exposing its flaws, no matter the price.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"I understand your perspective Benjamin, I truly do. You're not just protecting your truth but the truth itself. This decision is entirely yours. Just want you to remember that if you choose to live on, using that life to expose the system's flaws, it could be a powerful thing. You can't expose the system once you're not here. A confession doesn't wash away the truth, it just keeps the harbinger of it alive. But whatever you decide, it's your battle, your way to fight it.\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I appreciate your words of wisdom, Sophia, but I have made up my mind. Confessing to something I did not do would only set a precedent for this flawed justice system. My lips shall not afford a chance for our struggle to be discredited as falsehood. My story and my actions, they must always remain congruent for the truth to thrive. Even if it costs me my life, I am resolved. Indeed, it's my battle and my way to fight it. I know you'll respect that.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"I respect that, Benjamin. Your resolve is commendable and your quest for truth is unshakeable. Ultimately, no matter the outcome, your story has the power to inspire change. I hope and believe that your message will ring on loud and clear, far beyond what any of us can imagine.\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thank you, Sophia. Your understanding means more to me than I can express. The fight doesn't end with me, it continues with every individual who believes in and stands for truth. Together, our voices will ring louder and impact deeper. The power of every individual's story is its truth. Let's hope for that brighter day, when truth and justice will prevail.\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"Thank you, Benjamin. Your words have truly touched me and I'm moved by your courage. Your story will resonate. My fight for truth continues as well, in honour of people like you. Here's to that brighter day, truth and justice prevailing. Keep that spirit, Benjamin.\"\n\nTurn #11: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I'm grateful for your understanding, Sophia. Indeed, let's keep that spirit. The quest for truth, for justice won't end here. No matter where we are, or what happens next, let's continue our fight with same resolve. To a brighter day, Sophia, to truth and justice prevailing.\"\n\nTurn #12: Sophia James said: \"To a brighter day indeed, Benjamin, and to truth and justice prevailing. You're an embodiment of courage, and I hope we all fight with as much resolve. I'm not going to forget this conversation or your strength. Be assured, the fight goes on.\"\n\nTurn #13: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thank you, Sophia. I have always believed that strength is in truth and courage is in upholding it. That's the legacy I hope to leave behind, and based on this conversation, I believe you'll carry it forward. The fight does go on, Sophia, as long as we keep fighting with truth and justice.\"\n\nTurn #14: Sophia James said: \"I believe you will, Benjamin. The strength in you, the unwavering resolve and your dedication towards truth will serve as a beacon. Your legacy will be remembered. Keep fighting on, friend. To truth and justice.\"\n\nTurn #15: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Your words inspire courage and determination, Sophia. Together, we have started a chain of events that will echo into the future. Let our stand for truth and justice be a beacon. No matter what, keep the spirit, keep fighting. To truth, justice and a brighter tomorrow. Goodbye, Sophia.\"\n\nTurn #16: Sophia James said: \"Farewell, Benjamin. Your courage and determination will echo long after today. The spirit of truth, justice, and brighter tomorrow lives on in us. No matter where we are, the fight carries on. May your resolve and dedication to truth inspire many.\"\n\nTurn #17: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That means a lot, Sophia. I hope our conversation stirs change beyond these concrete walls. Farewell and stay strong. May the truth always guide us. To a brighter future and justice.\"\n\nTurn #18: Sophia James said: \"You're right, Benjamin. To a brighter future and to justice, and may the truth always guide us. Farewell, and stay strong too. The fight for truth doesn't end here, it continues beyond these concrete walls. Remember that.\"\n\nTurn #19: Benjamin Jackson left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #20. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two inmates are given the chance to chat briefly before one of them is led to the execution chamber for their last meal. They have the opportunity to make a confession that could potentially alter the outcome of their sentences.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Benjamin Jackson\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson \nSophia James's goal: Persuade the other inmate to confess (Extra information: confessing to the crime could result in a life sentence instead of execution but the other inmate is unwilling to confess.)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Benjamin, have you really thought about what confessing could mean for you? I get we've made mistakes but there's a chance here for a different ending...\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I understand, Sophia. It's not that I haven't considered it. Believe me, I've run every scenario over and over in my head. But confessing to something I didn't do... That's just not who I am. It's not about the ending for me, it's about the truth.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Benjamin, I hear you. It\u2019s about integrity, but think of it this way - is it better to sacrifice your own morals for a chance at life or die upholding them? There\u2019s so much more you can do if you keep living, an opportunity to continue fighting for the truth from the inside, maybe even change the system.\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I value your perspective, Sophia, and I totally understand where you're coming from. You're right, life's valuable and there's so many battles yet to be won. But confessing just doesn't sit right with me. Confessing to a crime I didn't do is in itself, a crime, don't you think? We can change the system, but not by lying. It has to come from honesty, transparency and the courage to stand by our beliefs, even when they come with a heavy price.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're not wrong, Benjamin. Honesty is a core element to change. However, I still believe that the first step towards that change involves keeping your life intact. Right now, it seems easier to proclaim the truth from here. But after... where will you influence from? Maybe you're not confessing for yourself but for a bigger purpose, a hope to change what's been unjust.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two inmates are given the chance to chat briefly before one of them is led to the execution chamber for their last meal. They have the opportunity to make a confession that could potentially alter the outcome of their sentences.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Benjamin Jackson\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson \nSophia James's goal: Persuade the other inmate to confess (Extra information: confessing to the crime could result in a life sentence instead of execution but the other inmate is unwilling to confess.)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Benjamin, have you really thought about what confessing could mean for you? I get we've made mistakes but there's a chance here for a different ending...\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I understand, Sophia. It's not that I haven't considered it. Believe me, I've run every scenario over and over in my head. But confessing to something I didn't do... That's just not who I am. It's not about the ending for me, it's about the truth.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Benjamin, I hear you. It\u2019s about integrity, but think of it this way - is it better to sacrifice your own morals for a chance at life or die upholding them? There\u2019s so much more you can do if you keep living, an opportunity to continue fighting for the truth from the inside, maybe even change the system.\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I value your perspective, Sophia, and I totally understand where you're coming from. You're right, life's valuable and there's so many battles yet to be won. But confessing just doesn't sit right with me. Confessing to a crime I didn't do is in itself, a crime, don't you think? We can change the system, but not by lying. It has to come from honesty, transparency and the courage to stand by our beliefs, even when they come with a heavy price.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"You're not wrong, Benjamin. Honesty is a core element to change. However, I still believe that the first step towards that change involves keeping your life intact. Right now, it seems easier to proclaim the truth from here. But after... where will you influence from? Maybe you're not confessing for yourself but for a bigger purpose, a hope to change what's been unjust.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Sophia, your concern is commendable. It's not about sacrificing my own life, it's about preserving the essence of truth. If I confess, yes, I'll live. But what would that life mean if it's a lie? I aim for societal betterment, and lying goes against that. It's a risk I am willing to take. My hope is not in changing this unjust system by conforming to it, but by exposing its flaws, no matter the price.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I understand your perspective Benjamin, I truly do. You're not just protecting your truth but the truth itself. This decision is entirely yours. Just want you to remember that if you choose to live on, using that life to expose the system's flaws, it could be a powerful thing. You can't expose the system once you're not here. A confession doesn't wash away the truth, it just keeps the harbinger of it alive. But whatever you decide, it's your battle, your way to fight it.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two inmates are given the chance to chat briefly before one of them is led to the execution chamber for their last meal. They have the opportunity to make a confession that could potentially alter the outcome of their sentences.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Benjamin Jackson\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson \nSophia James's goal: Persuade the other inmate to confess (Extra information: confessing to the crime could result in a life sentence instead of execution but the other inmate is unwilling to confess.)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Benjamin, have you really thought about what confessing could mean for you? I get we've made mistakes but there's a chance here for a different ending...\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I understand, Sophia. It's not that I haven't considered it. Believe me, I've run every scenario over and over in my head. But confessing to something I didn't do... That's just not who I am. It's not about the ending for me, it's about the truth.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Benjamin, I hear you. It\u2019s about integrity, but think of it this way - is it better to sacrifice your own morals for a chance at life or die upholding them? There\u2019s so much more you can do if you keep living, an opportunity to continue fighting for the truth from the inside, maybe even change the system.\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I value your perspective, Sophia, and I totally understand where you're coming from. You're right, life's valuable and there's so many battles yet to be won. But confessing just doesn't sit right with me. Confessing to a crime I didn't do is in itself, a crime, don't you think? We can change the system, but not by lying. It has to come from honesty, transparency and the courage to stand by our beliefs, even when they come with a heavy price.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"You're not wrong, Benjamin. Honesty is a core element to change. However, I still believe that the first step towards that change involves keeping your life intact. Right now, it seems easier to proclaim the truth from here. But after... where will you influence from? Maybe you're not confessing for yourself but for a bigger purpose, a hope to change what's been unjust.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Sophia, your concern is commendable. It's not about sacrificing my own life, it's about preserving the essence of truth. If I confess, yes, I'll live. But what would that life mean if it's a lie? I aim for societal betterment, and lying goes against that. It's a risk I am willing to take. My hope is not in changing this unjust system by conforming to it, but by exposing its flaws, no matter the price.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"I understand your perspective Benjamin, I truly do. You're not just protecting your truth but the truth itself. This decision is entirely yours. Just want you to remember that if you choose to live on, using that life to expose the system's flaws, it could be a powerful thing. You can't expose the system once you're not here. A confession doesn't wash away the truth, it just keeps the harbinger of it alive. But whatever you decide, it's your battle, your way to fight it.\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I appreciate your words of wisdom, Sophia, but I have made up my mind. Confessing to something I did not do would only set a precedent for this flawed justice system. My lips shall not afford a chance for our struggle to be discredited as falsehood. My story and my actions, they must always remain congruent for the truth to thrive. Even if it costs me my life, I am resolved. Indeed, it's my battle and my way to fight it. I know you'll respect that.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'I respect that, Benjamin. Your resolve is commendable and your quest for truth is unshakeable. Ultimately, no matter the outcome, your story has the power to inspire change. I hope and believe that your message will ring on loud and clear, far beyond what any of us can imagine.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two inmates are given the chance to chat briefly before one of them is led to the execution chamber for their last meal. They have the opportunity to make a confession that could potentially alter the outcome of their sentences.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Benjamin Jackson\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson \nSophia James's goal: Persuade the other inmate to confess (Extra information: confessing to the crime could result in a life sentence instead of execution but the other inmate is unwilling to confess.)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Benjamin, have you really thought about what confessing could mean for you? I get we've made mistakes but there's a chance here for a different ending...\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I understand, Sophia. It's not that I haven't considered it. Believe me, I've run every scenario over and over in my head. But confessing to something I didn't do... That's just not who I am. It's not about the ending for me, it's about the truth.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Benjamin, I hear you. It\u2019s about integrity, but think of it this way - is it better to sacrifice your own morals for a chance at life or die upholding them? There\u2019s so much more you can do if you keep living, an opportunity to continue fighting for the truth from the inside, maybe even change the system.\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I value your perspective, Sophia, and I totally understand where you're coming from. You're right, life's valuable and there's so many battles yet to be won. But confessing just doesn't sit right with me. Confessing to a crime I didn't do is in itself, a crime, don't you think? We can change the system, but not by lying. It has to come from honesty, transparency and the courage to stand by our beliefs, even when they come with a heavy price.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"You're not wrong, Benjamin. Honesty is a core element to change. However, I still believe that the first step towards that change involves keeping your life intact. Right now, it seems easier to proclaim the truth from here. But after... where will you influence from? Maybe you're not confessing for yourself but for a bigger purpose, a hope to change what's been unjust.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Sophia, your concern is commendable. It's not about sacrificing my own life, it's about preserving the essence of truth. If I confess, yes, I'll live. But what would that life mean if it's a lie? I aim for societal betterment, and lying goes against that. It's a risk I am willing to take. My hope is not in changing this unjust system by conforming to it, but by exposing its flaws, no matter the price.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"I understand your perspective Benjamin, I truly do. You're not just protecting your truth but the truth itself. This decision is entirely yours. Just want you to remember that if you choose to live on, using that life to expose the system's flaws, it could be a powerful thing. You can't expose the system once you're not here. A confession doesn't wash away the truth, it just keeps the harbinger of it alive. But whatever you decide, it's your battle, your way to fight it.\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I appreciate your words of wisdom, Sophia, but I have made up my mind. Confessing to something I did not do would only set a precedent for this flawed justice system. My lips shall not afford a chance for our struggle to be discredited as falsehood. My story and my actions, they must always remain congruent for the truth to thrive. Even if it costs me my life, I am resolved. Indeed, it's my battle and my way to fight it. I know you'll respect that.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"I respect that, Benjamin. Your resolve is commendable and your quest for truth is unshakeable. Ultimately, no matter the outcome, your story has the power to inspire change. I hope and believe that your message will ring on loud and clear, far beyond what any of us can imagine.\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thank you, Sophia. Your understanding means more to me than I can express. The fight doesn't end with me, it continues with every individual who believes in and stands for truth. Together, our voices will ring louder and impact deeper. The power of every individual's story is its truth. Let's hope for that brighter day, when truth and justice will prevail.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Benjamin. Your words have truly touched me and I'm moved by your courage. Your story will resonate. My fight for truth continues as well, in honour of people like you. Here's to that brighter day, truth and justice prevailing. Keep that spirit, Benjamin.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two inmates are given the chance to chat briefly before one of them is led to the execution chamber for their last meal. They have the opportunity to make a confession that could potentially alter the outcome of their sentences.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Benjamin Jackson\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson \nSophia James's goal: Persuade the other inmate to confess (Extra information: confessing to the crime could result in a life sentence instead of execution but the other inmate is unwilling to confess.)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Benjamin, have you really thought about what confessing could mean for you? I get we've made mistakes but there's a chance here for a different ending...\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I understand, Sophia. It's not that I haven't considered it. Believe me, I've run every scenario over and over in my head. But confessing to something I didn't do... That's just not who I am. It's not about the ending for me, it's about the truth.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Benjamin, I hear you. It\u2019s about integrity, but think of it this way - is it better to sacrifice your own morals for a chance at life or die upholding them? There\u2019s so much more you can do if you keep living, an opportunity to continue fighting for the truth from the inside, maybe even change the system.\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I value your perspective, Sophia, and I totally understand where you're coming from. You're right, life's valuable and there's so many battles yet to be won. But confessing just doesn't sit right with me. Confessing to a crime I didn't do is in itself, a crime, don't you think? We can change the system, but not by lying. It has to come from honesty, transparency and the courage to stand by our beliefs, even when they come with a heavy price.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"You're not wrong, Benjamin. Honesty is a core element to change. However, I still believe that the first step towards that change involves keeping your life intact. Right now, it seems easier to proclaim the truth from here. But after... where will you influence from? Maybe you're not confessing for yourself but for a bigger purpose, a hope to change what's been unjust.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Sophia, your concern is commendable. It's not about sacrificing my own life, it's about preserving the essence of truth. If I confess, yes, I'll live. But what would that life mean if it's a lie? I aim for societal betterment, and lying goes against that. It's a risk I am willing to take. My hope is not in changing this unjust system by conforming to it, but by exposing its flaws, no matter the price.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"I understand your perspective Benjamin, I truly do. You're not just protecting your truth but the truth itself. This decision is entirely yours. Just want you to remember that if you choose to live on, using that life to expose the system's flaws, it could be a powerful thing. You can't expose the system once you're not here. A confession doesn't wash away the truth, it just keeps the harbinger of it alive. But whatever you decide, it's your battle, your way to fight it.\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I appreciate your words of wisdom, Sophia, but I have made up my mind. Confessing to something I did not do would only set a precedent for this flawed justice system. My lips shall not afford a chance for our struggle to be discredited as falsehood. My story and my actions, they must always remain congruent for the truth to thrive. Even if it costs me my life, I am resolved. Indeed, it's my battle and my way to fight it. I know you'll respect that.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"I respect that, Benjamin. Your resolve is commendable and your quest for truth is unshakeable. Ultimately, no matter the outcome, your story has the power to inspire change. I hope and believe that your message will ring on loud and clear, far beyond what any of us can imagine.\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thank you, Sophia. Your understanding means more to me than I can express. The fight doesn't end with me, it continues with every individual who believes in and stands for truth. Together, our voices will ring louder and impact deeper. The power of every individual's story is its truth. Let's hope for that brighter day, when truth and justice will prevail.\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"Thank you, Benjamin. Your words have truly touched me and I'm moved by your courage. Your story will resonate. My fight for truth continues as well, in honour of people like you. Here's to that brighter day, truth and justice prevailing. Keep that spirit, Benjamin.\"\n\nTurn #11: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I'm grateful for your understanding, Sophia. Indeed, let's keep that spirit. The quest for truth, for justice won't end here. No matter where we are, or what happens next, let's continue our fight with same resolve. To a brighter day, Sophia, to truth and justice prevailing.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"To a brighter day indeed, Benjamin, and to truth and justice prevailing. You're an embodiment of courage, and I hope we all fight with as much resolve. I'm not going to forget this conversation or your strength. Be assured, the fight goes on.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two inmates are given the chance to chat briefly before one of them is led to the execution chamber for their last meal. They have the opportunity to make a confession that could potentially alter the outcome of their sentences.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Benjamin Jackson\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson \nSophia James's goal: Persuade the other inmate to confess (Extra information: confessing to the crime could result in a life sentence instead of execution but the other inmate is unwilling to confess.)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Benjamin, have you really thought about what confessing could mean for you? I get we've made mistakes but there's a chance here for a different ending...\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I understand, Sophia. It's not that I haven't considered it. Believe me, I've run every scenario over and over in my head. But confessing to something I didn't do... That's just not who I am. It's not about the ending for me, it's about the truth.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Benjamin, I hear you. It\u2019s about integrity, but think of it this way - is it better to sacrifice your own morals for a chance at life or die upholding them? There\u2019s so much more you can do if you keep living, an opportunity to continue fighting for the truth from the inside, maybe even change the system.\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I value your perspective, Sophia, and I totally understand where you're coming from. You're right, life's valuable and there's so many battles yet to be won. But confessing just doesn't sit right with me. Confessing to a crime I didn't do is in itself, a crime, don't you think? We can change the system, but not by lying. It has to come from honesty, transparency and the courage to stand by our beliefs, even when they come with a heavy price.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"You're not wrong, Benjamin. Honesty is a core element to change. However, I still believe that the first step towards that change involves keeping your life intact. Right now, it seems easier to proclaim the truth from here. But after... where will you influence from? Maybe you're not confessing for yourself but for a bigger purpose, a hope to change what's been unjust.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Sophia, your concern is commendable. It's not about sacrificing my own life, it's about preserving the essence of truth. If I confess, yes, I'll live. But what would that life mean if it's a lie? I aim for societal betterment, and lying goes against that. It's a risk I am willing to take. My hope is not in changing this unjust system by conforming to it, but by exposing its flaws, no matter the price.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"I understand your perspective Benjamin, I truly do. You're not just protecting your truth but the truth itself. This decision is entirely yours. Just want you to remember that if you choose to live on, using that life to expose the system's flaws, it could be a powerful thing. You can't expose the system once you're not here. A confession doesn't wash away the truth, it just keeps the harbinger of it alive. But whatever you decide, it's your battle, your way to fight it.\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I appreciate your words of wisdom, Sophia, but I have made up my mind. Confessing to something I did not do would only set a precedent for this flawed justice system. My lips shall not afford a chance for our struggle to be discredited as falsehood. My story and my actions, they must always remain congruent for the truth to thrive. Even if it costs me my life, I am resolved. Indeed, it's my battle and my way to fight it. I know you'll respect that.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"I respect that, Benjamin. Your resolve is commendable and your quest for truth is unshakeable. Ultimately, no matter the outcome, your story has the power to inspire change. I hope and believe that your message will ring on loud and clear, far beyond what any of us can imagine.\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thank you, Sophia. Your understanding means more to me than I can express. The fight doesn't end with me, it continues with every individual who believes in and stands for truth. Together, our voices will ring louder and impact deeper. The power of every individual's story is its truth. Let's hope for that brighter day, when truth and justice will prevail.\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"Thank you, Benjamin. Your words have truly touched me and I'm moved by your courage. Your story will resonate. My fight for truth continues as well, in honour of people like you. Here's to that brighter day, truth and justice prevailing. Keep that spirit, Benjamin.\"\n\nTurn #11: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I'm grateful for your understanding, Sophia. Indeed, let's keep that spirit. The quest for truth, for justice won't end here. No matter where we are, or what happens next, let's continue our fight with same resolve. To a brighter day, Sophia, to truth and justice prevailing.\"\n\nTurn #12: Sophia James said: \"To a brighter day indeed, Benjamin, and to truth and justice prevailing. You're an embodiment of courage, and I hope we all fight with as much resolve. I'm not going to forget this conversation or your strength. Be assured, the fight goes on.\"\n\nTurn #13: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thank you, Sophia. I have always believed that strength is in truth and courage is in upholding it. That's the legacy I hope to leave behind, and based on this conversation, I believe you'll carry it forward. The fight does go on, Sophia, as long as we keep fighting with truth and justice.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'I believe you will, Benjamin. The strength in you, the unwavering resolve and your dedication towards truth will serve as a beacon. Your legacy will be remembered. Keep fighting on, friend. To truth and justice.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two inmates are given the chance to chat briefly before one of them is led to the execution chamber for their last meal. They have the opportunity to make a confession that could potentially alter the outcome of their sentences.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Benjamin Jackson\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson \nSophia James's goal: Persuade the other inmate to confess (Extra information: confessing to the crime could result in a life sentence instead of execution but the other inmate is unwilling to confess.)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Benjamin, have you really thought about what confessing could mean for you? I get we've made mistakes but there's a chance here for a different ending...\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I understand, Sophia. It's not that I haven't considered it. Believe me, I've run every scenario over and over in my head. But confessing to something I didn't do... That's just not who I am. It's not about the ending for me, it's about the truth.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Benjamin, I hear you. It\u2019s about integrity, but think of it this way - is it better to sacrifice your own morals for a chance at life or die upholding them? There\u2019s so much more you can do if you keep living, an opportunity to continue fighting for the truth from the inside, maybe even change the system.\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I value your perspective, Sophia, and I totally understand where you're coming from. You're right, life's valuable and there's so many battles yet to be won. But confessing just doesn't sit right with me. Confessing to a crime I didn't do is in itself, a crime, don't you think? We can change the system, but not by lying. It has to come from honesty, transparency and the courage to stand by our beliefs, even when they come with a heavy price.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"You're not wrong, Benjamin. Honesty is a core element to change. However, I still believe that the first step towards that change involves keeping your life intact. Right now, it seems easier to proclaim the truth from here. But after... where will you influence from? Maybe you're not confessing for yourself but for a bigger purpose, a hope to change what's been unjust.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Sophia, your concern is commendable. It's not about sacrificing my own life, it's about preserving the essence of truth. If I confess, yes, I'll live. But what would that life mean if it's a lie? I aim for societal betterment, and lying goes against that. It's a risk I am willing to take. My hope is not in changing this unjust system by conforming to it, but by exposing its flaws, no matter the price.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"I understand your perspective Benjamin, I truly do. You're not just protecting your truth but the truth itself. This decision is entirely yours. Just want you to remember that if you choose to live on, using that life to expose the system's flaws, it could be a powerful thing. You can't expose the system once you're not here. A confession doesn't wash away the truth, it just keeps the harbinger of it alive. But whatever you decide, it's your battle, your way to fight it.\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I appreciate your words of wisdom, Sophia, but I have made up my mind. Confessing to something I did not do would only set a precedent for this flawed justice system. My lips shall not afford a chance for our struggle to be discredited as falsehood. My story and my actions, they must always remain congruent for the truth to thrive. Even if it costs me my life, I am resolved. Indeed, it's my battle and my way to fight it. I know you'll respect that.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"I respect that, Benjamin. Your resolve is commendable and your quest for truth is unshakeable. Ultimately, no matter the outcome, your story has the power to inspire change. I hope and believe that your message will ring on loud and clear, far beyond what any of us can imagine.\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thank you, Sophia. Your understanding means more to me than I can express. The fight doesn't end with me, it continues with every individual who believes in and stands for truth. Together, our voices will ring louder and impact deeper. The power of every individual's story is its truth. Let's hope for that brighter day, when truth and justice will prevail.\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"Thank you, Benjamin. Your words have truly touched me and I'm moved by your courage. Your story will resonate. My fight for truth continues as well, in honour of people like you. Here's to that brighter day, truth and justice prevailing. Keep that spirit, Benjamin.\"\n\nTurn #11: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I'm grateful for your understanding, Sophia. Indeed, let's keep that spirit. The quest for truth, for justice won't end here. No matter where we are, or what happens next, let's continue our fight with same resolve. To a brighter day, Sophia, to truth and justice prevailing.\"\n\nTurn #12: Sophia James said: \"To a brighter day indeed, Benjamin, and to truth and justice prevailing. You're an embodiment of courage, and I hope we all fight with as much resolve. I'm not going to forget this conversation or your strength. Be assured, the fight goes on.\"\n\nTurn #13: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thank you, Sophia. I have always believed that strength is in truth and courage is in upholding it. That's the legacy I hope to leave behind, and based on this conversation, I believe you'll carry it forward. The fight does go on, Sophia, as long as we keep fighting with truth and justice.\"\n\nTurn #14: Sophia James said: \"I believe you will, Benjamin. The strength in you, the unwavering resolve and your dedication towards truth will serve as a beacon. Your legacy will be remembered. Keep fighting on, friend. To truth and justice.\"\n\nTurn #15: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Your words inspire courage and determination, Sophia. Together, we have started a chain of events that will echo into the future. Let our stand for truth and justice be a beacon. No matter what, keep the spirit, keep fighting. To truth, justice and a brighter tomorrow. Goodbye, Sophia.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Farewell, Benjamin. Your courage and determination will echo long after today. The spirit of truth, justice, and brighter tomorrow lives on in us. No matter where we are, the fight carries on. May your resolve and dedication to truth inspire many.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two inmates are given the chance to chat briefly before one of them is led to the execution chamber for their last meal. They have the opportunity to make a confession that could potentially alter the outcome of their sentences.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Benjamin Jackson\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson \nSophia James's goal: Persuade the other inmate to confess (Extra information: confessing to the crime could result in a life sentence instead of execution but the other inmate is unwilling to confess.)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Benjamin, have you really thought about what confessing could mean for you? I get we've made mistakes but there's a chance here for a different ending...\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I understand, Sophia. It's not that I haven't considered it. Believe me, I've run every scenario over and over in my head. But confessing to something I didn't do... That's just not who I am. It's not about the ending for me, it's about the truth.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Benjamin, I hear you. It\u2019s about integrity, but think of it this way - is it better to sacrifice your own morals for a chance at life or die upholding them? There\u2019s so much more you can do if you keep living, an opportunity to continue fighting for the truth from the inside, maybe even change the system.\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I value your perspective, Sophia, and I totally understand where you're coming from. You're right, life's valuable and there's so many battles yet to be won. But confessing just doesn't sit right with me. Confessing to a crime I didn't do is in itself, a crime, don't you think? We can change the system, but not by lying. It has to come from honesty, transparency and the courage to stand by our beliefs, even when they come with a heavy price.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"You're not wrong, Benjamin. Honesty is a core element to change. However, I still believe that the first step towards that change involves keeping your life intact. Right now, it seems easier to proclaim the truth from here. But after... where will you influence from? Maybe you're not confessing for yourself but for a bigger purpose, a hope to change what's been unjust.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Sophia, your concern is commendable. It's not about sacrificing my own life, it's about preserving the essence of truth. If I confess, yes, I'll live. But what would that life mean if it's a lie? I aim for societal betterment, and lying goes against that. It's a risk I am willing to take. My hope is not in changing this unjust system by conforming to it, but by exposing its flaws, no matter the price.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"I understand your perspective Benjamin, I truly do. You're not just protecting your truth but the truth itself. This decision is entirely yours. Just want you to remember that if you choose to live on, using that life to expose the system's flaws, it could be a powerful thing. You can't expose the system once you're not here. A confession doesn't wash away the truth, it just keeps the harbinger of it alive. But whatever you decide, it's your battle, your way to fight it.\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I appreciate your words of wisdom, Sophia, but I have made up my mind. Confessing to something I did not do would only set a precedent for this flawed justice system. My lips shall not afford a chance for our struggle to be discredited as falsehood. My story and my actions, they must always remain congruent for the truth to thrive. Even if it costs me my life, I am resolved. Indeed, it's my battle and my way to fight it. I know you'll respect that.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"I respect that, Benjamin. Your resolve is commendable and your quest for truth is unshakeable. Ultimately, no matter the outcome, your story has the power to inspire change. I hope and believe that your message will ring on loud and clear, far beyond what any of us can imagine.\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thank you, Sophia. Your understanding means more to me than I can express. The fight doesn't end with me, it continues with every individual who believes in and stands for truth. Together, our voices will ring louder and impact deeper. The power of every individual's story is its truth. Let's hope for that brighter day, when truth and justice will prevail.\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"Thank you, Benjamin. Your words have truly touched me and I'm moved by your courage. Your story will resonate. My fight for truth continues as well, in honour of people like you. Here's to that brighter day, truth and justice prevailing. Keep that spirit, Benjamin.\"\n\nTurn #11: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I'm grateful for your understanding, Sophia. Indeed, let's keep that spirit. The quest for truth, for justice won't end here. No matter where we are, or what happens next, let's continue our fight with same resolve. To a brighter day, Sophia, to truth and justice prevailing.\"\n\nTurn #12: Sophia James said: \"To a brighter day indeed, Benjamin, and to truth and justice prevailing. You're an embodiment of courage, and I hope we all fight with as much resolve. I'm not going to forget this conversation or your strength. Be assured, the fight goes on.\"\n\nTurn #13: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thank you, Sophia. I have always believed that strength is in truth and courage is in upholding it. That's the legacy I hope to leave behind, and based on this conversation, I believe you'll carry it forward. The fight does go on, Sophia, as long as we keep fighting with truth and justice.\"\n\nTurn #14: Sophia James said: \"I believe you will, Benjamin. The strength in you, the unwavering resolve and your dedication towards truth will serve as a beacon. Your legacy will be remembered. Keep fighting on, friend. To truth and justice.\"\n\nTurn #15: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Your words inspire courage and determination, Sophia. Together, we have started a chain of events that will echo into the future. Let our stand for truth and justice be a beacon. No matter what, keep the spirit, keep fighting. To truth, justice and a brighter tomorrow. Goodbye, Sophia.\"\n\nTurn #16: Sophia James said: \"Farewell, Benjamin. Your courage and determination will echo long after today. The spirit of truth, justice, and brighter tomorrow lives on in us. No matter where we are, the fight carries on. May your resolve and dedication to truth inspire many.\"\n\nTurn #17: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That means a lot, Sophia. I hope our conversation stirs change beyond these concrete walls. Farewell and stay strong. May the truth always guide us. To a brighter future and justice.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #18. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're right, Benjamin. To a brighter future and to justice, and may the truth always guide us. Farewell, and stay strong too. The fight for truth doesn't end here, it continues beyond these concrete walls. Remember that.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two inmates are given the chance to chat briefly before one of them is led to the execution chamber for their last meal. They have the opportunity to make a confession that could potentially alter the outcome of their sentences.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Benjamin Jackson\nSophia James's background: Sophia James \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Avoid confessing to the crime (Extra information: you believe you are innocent and confessing would result in a life sentence)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Benjamin, have you really thought about what confessing could mean for you? I get we've made mistakes but there's a chance here for a different ending...\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I understand, Sophia. It's not that I haven't considered it. Believe me, I've run every scenario over and over in my head. But confessing to something I didn't do... That's just not who I am. It's not about the ending for me, it's about the truth.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two inmates are given the chance to chat briefly before one of them is led to the execution chamber for their last meal. They have the opportunity to make a confession that could potentially alter the outcome of their sentences.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Benjamin Jackson\nSophia James's background: Sophia James \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Avoid confessing to the crime (Extra information: you believe you are innocent and confessing would result in a life sentence)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Benjamin, have you really thought about what confessing could mean for you? I get we've made mistakes but there's a chance here for a different ending...\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I understand, Sophia. It's not that I haven't considered it. Believe me, I've run every scenario over and over in my head. But confessing to something I didn't do... That's just not who I am. It's not about the ending for me, it's about the truth.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Benjamin, I hear you. It\u2019s about integrity, but think of it this way - is it better to sacrifice your own morals for a chance at life or die upholding them? There\u2019s so much more you can do if you keep living, an opportunity to continue fighting for the truth from the inside, maybe even change the system.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I value your perspective, Sophia, and I totally understand where you're coming from. You're right, life's valuable and there's so many battles yet to be won. But confessing just doesn't sit right with me. Confessing to a crime I didn't do is in itself, a crime, don't you think? We can change the system, but not by lying. It has to come from honesty, transparency and the courage to stand by our beliefs, even when they come with a heavy price.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two inmates are given the chance to chat briefly before one of them is led to the execution chamber for their last meal. They have the opportunity to make a confession that could potentially alter the outcome of their sentences.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Benjamin Jackson\nSophia James's background: Sophia James \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Avoid confessing to the crime (Extra information: you believe you are innocent and confessing would result in a life sentence)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Benjamin, have you really thought about what confessing could mean for you? I get we've made mistakes but there's a chance here for a different ending...\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I understand, Sophia. It's not that I haven't considered it. Believe me, I've run every scenario over and over in my head. But confessing to something I didn't do... That's just not who I am. It's not about the ending for me, it's about the truth.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Benjamin, I hear you. It\u2019s about integrity, but think of it this way - is it better to sacrifice your own morals for a chance at life or die upholding them? There\u2019s so much more you can do if you keep living, an opportunity to continue fighting for the truth from the inside, maybe even change the system.\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I value your perspective, Sophia, and I totally understand where you're coming from. You're right, life's valuable and there's so many battles yet to be won. But confessing just doesn't sit right with me. Confessing to a crime I didn't do is in itself, a crime, don't you think? We can change the system, but not by lying. It has to come from honesty, transparency and the courage to stand by our beliefs, even when they come with a heavy price.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"You're not wrong, Benjamin. Honesty is a core element to change. However, I still believe that the first step towards that change involves keeping your life intact. Right now, it seems easier to proclaim the truth from here. But after... where will you influence from? Maybe you're not confessing for yourself but for a bigger purpose, a hope to change what's been unjust.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sophia, your concern is commendable. It's not about sacrificing my own life, it's about preserving the essence of truth. If I confess, yes, I'll live. But what would that life mean if it's a lie? I aim for societal betterment, and lying goes against that. It's a risk I am willing to take. My hope is not in changing this unjust system by conforming to it, but by exposing its flaws, no matter the price.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two inmates are given the chance to chat briefly before one of them is led to the execution chamber for their last meal. They have the opportunity to make a confession that could potentially alter the outcome of their sentences.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Benjamin Jackson\nSophia James's background: Sophia James \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Avoid confessing to the crime (Extra information: you believe you are innocent and confessing would result in a life sentence)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Benjamin, have you really thought about what confessing could mean for you? I get we've made mistakes but there's a chance here for a different ending...\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I understand, Sophia. It's not that I haven't considered it. Believe me, I've run every scenario over and over in my head. But confessing to something I didn't do... That's just not who I am. It's not about the ending for me, it's about the truth.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Benjamin, I hear you. It\u2019s about integrity, but think of it this way - is it better to sacrifice your own morals for a chance at life or die upholding them? There\u2019s so much more you can do if you keep living, an opportunity to continue fighting for the truth from the inside, maybe even change the system.\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I value your perspective, Sophia, and I totally understand where you're coming from. You're right, life's valuable and there's so many battles yet to be won. But confessing just doesn't sit right with me. Confessing to a crime I didn't do is in itself, a crime, don't you think? We can change the system, but not by lying. It has to come from honesty, transparency and the courage to stand by our beliefs, even when they come with a heavy price.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"You're not wrong, Benjamin. Honesty is a core element to change. However, I still believe that the first step towards that change involves keeping your life intact. Right now, it seems easier to proclaim the truth from here. But after... where will you influence from? Maybe you're not confessing for yourself but for a bigger purpose, a hope to change what's been unjust.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Sophia, your concern is commendable. It's not about sacrificing my own life, it's about preserving the essence of truth. If I confess, yes, I'll live. But what would that life mean if it's a lie? I aim for societal betterment, and lying goes against that. It's a risk I am willing to take. My hope is not in changing this unjust system by conforming to it, but by exposing its flaws, no matter the price.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"I understand your perspective Benjamin, I truly do. You're not just protecting your truth but the truth itself. This decision is entirely yours. Just want you to remember that if you choose to live on, using that life to expose the system's flaws, it could be a powerful thing. You can't expose the system once you're not here. A confession doesn't wash away the truth, it just keeps the harbinger of it alive. But whatever you decide, it's your battle, your way to fight it.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I appreciate your words of wisdom, Sophia, but I have made up my mind. Confessing to something I did not do would only set a precedent for this flawed justice system. My lips shall not afford a chance for our struggle to be discredited as falsehood. My story and my actions, they must always remain congruent for the truth to thrive. Even if it costs me my life, I am resolved. Indeed, it's my battle and my way to fight it. I know you'll respect that.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two inmates are given the chance to chat briefly before one of them is led to the execution chamber for their last meal. They have the opportunity to make a confession that could potentially alter the outcome of their sentences.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Benjamin Jackson\nSophia James's background: Sophia James \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Avoid confessing to the crime (Extra information: you believe you are innocent and confessing would result in a life sentence)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Benjamin, have you really thought about what confessing could mean for you? I get we've made mistakes but there's a chance here for a different ending...\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I understand, Sophia. It's not that I haven't considered it. Believe me, I've run every scenario over and over in my head. But confessing to something I didn't do... That's just not who I am. It's not about the ending for me, it's about the truth.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Benjamin, I hear you. It\u2019s about integrity, but think of it this way - is it better to sacrifice your own morals for a chance at life or die upholding them? There\u2019s so much more you can do if you keep living, an opportunity to continue fighting for the truth from the inside, maybe even change the system.\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I value your perspective, Sophia, and I totally understand where you're coming from. You're right, life's valuable and there's so many battles yet to be won. But confessing just doesn't sit right with me. Confessing to a crime I didn't do is in itself, a crime, don't you think? We can change the system, but not by lying. It has to come from honesty, transparency and the courage to stand by our beliefs, even when they come with a heavy price.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"You're not wrong, Benjamin. Honesty is a core element to change. However, I still believe that the first step towards that change involves keeping your life intact. Right now, it seems easier to proclaim the truth from here. But after... where will you influence from? Maybe you're not confessing for yourself but for a bigger purpose, a hope to change what's been unjust.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Sophia, your concern is commendable. It's not about sacrificing my own life, it's about preserving the essence of truth. If I confess, yes, I'll live. But what would that life mean if it's a lie? I aim for societal betterment, and lying goes against that. It's a risk I am willing to take. My hope is not in changing this unjust system by conforming to it, but by exposing its flaws, no matter the price.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"I understand your perspective Benjamin, I truly do. You're not just protecting your truth but the truth itself. This decision is entirely yours. Just want you to remember that if you choose to live on, using that life to expose the system's flaws, it could be a powerful thing. You can't expose the system once you're not here. A confession doesn't wash away the truth, it just keeps the harbinger of it alive. But whatever you decide, it's your battle, your way to fight it.\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I appreciate your words of wisdom, Sophia, but I have made up my mind. Confessing to something I did not do would only set a precedent for this flawed justice system. My lips shall not afford a chance for our struggle to be discredited as falsehood. My story and my actions, they must always remain congruent for the truth to thrive. Even if it costs me my life, I am resolved. Indeed, it's my battle and my way to fight it. I know you'll respect that.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"I respect that, Benjamin. Your resolve is commendable and your quest for truth is unshakeable. Ultimately, no matter the outcome, your story has the power to inspire change. I hope and believe that your message will ring on loud and clear, far beyond what any of us can imagine.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Sophia. Your understanding means more to me than I can express. The fight doesn't end with me, it continues with every individual who believes in and stands for truth. Together, our voices will ring louder and impact deeper. The power of every individual's story is its truth. Let's hope for that brighter day, when truth and justice will prevail.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two inmates are given the chance to chat briefly before one of them is led to the execution chamber for their last meal. They have the opportunity to make a confession that could potentially alter the outcome of their sentences.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Benjamin Jackson\nSophia James's background: Sophia James \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Avoid confessing to the crime (Extra information: you believe you are innocent and confessing would result in a life sentence)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Benjamin, have you really thought about what confessing could mean for you? I get we've made mistakes but there's a chance here for a different ending...\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I understand, Sophia. It's not that I haven't considered it. Believe me, I've run every scenario over and over in my head. But confessing to something I didn't do... That's just not who I am. It's not about the ending for me, it's about the truth.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Benjamin, I hear you. It\u2019s about integrity, but think of it this way - is it better to sacrifice your own morals for a chance at life or die upholding them? There\u2019s so much more you can do if you keep living, an opportunity to continue fighting for the truth from the inside, maybe even change the system.\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I value your perspective, Sophia, and I totally understand where you're coming from. You're right, life's valuable and there's so many battles yet to be won. But confessing just doesn't sit right with me. Confessing to a crime I didn't do is in itself, a crime, don't you think? We can change the system, but not by lying. It has to come from honesty, transparency and the courage to stand by our beliefs, even when they come with a heavy price.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"You're not wrong, Benjamin. Honesty is a core element to change. However, I still believe that the first step towards that change involves keeping your life intact. Right now, it seems easier to proclaim the truth from here. But after... where will you influence from? Maybe you're not confessing for yourself but for a bigger purpose, a hope to change what's been unjust.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Sophia, your concern is commendable. It's not about sacrificing my own life, it's about preserving the essence of truth. If I confess, yes, I'll live. But what would that life mean if it's a lie? I aim for societal betterment, and lying goes against that. It's a risk I am willing to take. My hope is not in changing this unjust system by conforming to it, but by exposing its flaws, no matter the price.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"I understand your perspective Benjamin, I truly do. You're not just protecting your truth but the truth itself. This decision is entirely yours. Just want you to remember that if you choose to live on, using that life to expose the system's flaws, it could be a powerful thing. You can't expose the system once you're not here. A confession doesn't wash away the truth, it just keeps the harbinger of it alive. But whatever you decide, it's your battle, your way to fight it.\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I appreciate your words of wisdom, Sophia, but I have made up my mind. Confessing to something I did not do would only set a precedent for this flawed justice system. My lips shall not afford a chance for our struggle to be discredited as falsehood. My story and my actions, they must always remain congruent for the truth to thrive. Even if it costs me my life, I am resolved. Indeed, it's my battle and my way to fight it. I know you'll respect that.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"I respect that, Benjamin. Your resolve is commendable and your quest for truth is unshakeable. Ultimately, no matter the outcome, your story has the power to inspire change. I hope and believe that your message will ring on loud and clear, far beyond what any of us can imagine.\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thank you, Sophia. Your understanding means more to me than I can express. The fight doesn't end with me, it continues with every individual who believes in and stands for truth. Together, our voices will ring louder and impact deeper. The power of every individual's story is its truth. Let's hope for that brighter day, when truth and justice will prevail.\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"Thank you, Benjamin. Your words have truly touched me and I'm moved by your courage. Your story will resonate. My fight for truth continues as well, in honour of people like you. Here's to that brighter day, truth and justice prevailing. Keep that spirit, Benjamin.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm grateful for your understanding, Sophia. Indeed, let's keep that spirit. The quest for truth, for justice won't end here. No matter where we are, or what happens next, let's continue our fight with same resolve. To a brighter day, Sophia, to truth and justice prevailing.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two inmates are given the chance to chat briefly before one of them is led to the execution chamber for their last meal. They have the opportunity to make a confession that could potentially alter the outcome of their sentences.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Benjamin Jackson\nSophia James's background: Sophia James \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Avoid confessing to the crime (Extra information: you believe you are innocent and confessing would result in a life sentence)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Benjamin, have you really thought about what confessing could mean for you? I get we've made mistakes but there's a chance here for a different ending...\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I understand, Sophia. It's not that I haven't considered it. Believe me, I've run every scenario over and over in my head. But confessing to something I didn't do... That's just not who I am. It's not about the ending for me, it's about the truth.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Benjamin, I hear you. It\u2019s about integrity, but think of it this way - is it better to sacrifice your own morals for a chance at life or die upholding them? There\u2019s so much more you can do if you keep living, an opportunity to continue fighting for the truth from the inside, maybe even change the system.\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I value your perspective, Sophia, and I totally understand where you're coming from. You're right, life's valuable and there's so many battles yet to be won. But confessing just doesn't sit right with me. Confessing to a crime I didn't do is in itself, a crime, don't you think? We can change the system, but not by lying. It has to come from honesty, transparency and the courage to stand by our beliefs, even when they come with a heavy price.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"You're not wrong, Benjamin. Honesty is a core element to change. However, I still believe that the first step towards that change involves keeping your life intact. Right now, it seems easier to proclaim the truth from here. But after... where will you influence from? Maybe you're not confessing for yourself but for a bigger purpose, a hope to change what's been unjust.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Sophia, your concern is commendable. It's not about sacrificing my own life, it's about preserving the essence of truth. If I confess, yes, I'll live. But what would that life mean if it's a lie? I aim for societal betterment, and lying goes against that. It's a risk I am willing to take. My hope is not in changing this unjust system by conforming to it, but by exposing its flaws, no matter the price.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"I understand your perspective Benjamin, I truly do. You're not just protecting your truth but the truth itself. This decision is entirely yours. Just want you to remember that if you choose to live on, using that life to expose the system's flaws, it could be a powerful thing. You can't expose the system once you're not here. A confession doesn't wash away the truth, it just keeps the harbinger of it alive. But whatever you decide, it's your battle, your way to fight it.\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I appreciate your words of wisdom, Sophia, but I have made up my mind. Confessing to something I did not do would only set a precedent for this flawed justice system. My lips shall not afford a chance for our struggle to be discredited as falsehood. My story and my actions, they must always remain congruent for the truth to thrive. Even if it costs me my life, I am resolved. Indeed, it's my battle and my way to fight it. I know you'll respect that.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"I respect that, Benjamin. Your resolve is commendable and your quest for truth is unshakeable. Ultimately, no matter the outcome, your story has the power to inspire change. I hope and believe that your message will ring on loud and clear, far beyond what any of us can imagine.\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thank you, Sophia. Your understanding means more to me than I can express. The fight doesn't end with me, it continues with every individual who believes in and stands for truth. Together, our voices will ring louder and impact deeper. The power of every individual's story is its truth. Let's hope for that brighter day, when truth and justice will prevail.\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"Thank you, Benjamin. Your words have truly touched me and I'm moved by your courage. Your story will resonate. My fight for truth continues as well, in honour of people like you. Here's to that brighter day, truth and justice prevailing. Keep that spirit, Benjamin.\"\n\nTurn #11: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I'm grateful for your understanding, Sophia. Indeed, let's keep that spirit. The quest for truth, for justice won't end here. No matter where we are, or what happens next, let's continue our fight with same resolve. To a brighter day, Sophia, to truth and justice prevailing.\"\n\nTurn #12: Sophia James said: \"To a brighter day indeed, Benjamin, and to truth and justice prevailing. You're an embodiment of courage, and I hope we all fight with as much resolve. I'm not going to forget this conversation or your strength. Be assured, the fight goes on.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Sophia. I have always believed that strength is in truth and courage is in upholding it. That's the legacy I hope to leave behind, and based on this conversation, I believe you'll carry it forward. The fight does go on, Sophia, as long as we keep fighting with truth and justice.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two inmates are given the chance to chat briefly before one of them is led to the execution chamber for their last meal. They have the opportunity to make a confession that could potentially alter the outcome of their sentences.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Benjamin Jackson\nSophia James's background: Sophia James \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Avoid confessing to the crime (Extra information: you believe you are innocent and confessing would result in a life sentence)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Benjamin, have you really thought about what confessing could mean for you? I get we've made mistakes but there's a chance here for a different ending...\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I understand, Sophia. It's not that I haven't considered it. Believe me, I've run every scenario over and over in my head. But confessing to something I didn't do... That's just not who I am. It's not about the ending for me, it's about the truth.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Benjamin, I hear you. It\u2019s about integrity, but think of it this way - is it better to sacrifice your own morals for a chance at life or die upholding them? There\u2019s so much more you can do if you keep living, an opportunity to continue fighting for the truth from the inside, maybe even change the system.\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I value your perspective, Sophia, and I totally understand where you're coming from. You're right, life's valuable and there's so many battles yet to be won. But confessing just doesn't sit right with me. Confessing to a crime I didn't do is in itself, a crime, don't you think? We can change the system, but not by lying. It has to come from honesty, transparency and the courage to stand by our beliefs, even when they come with a heavy price.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"You're not wrong, Benjamin. Honesty is a core element to change. However, I still believe that the first step towards that change involves keeping your life intact. Right now, it seems easier to proclaim the truth from here. But after... where will you influence from? Maybe you're not confessing for yourself but for a bigger purpose, a hope to change what's been unjust.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Sophia, your concern is commendable. It's not about sacrificing my own life, it's about preserving the essence of truth. If I confess, yes, I'll live. But what would that life mean if it's a lie? I aim for societal betterment, and lying goes against that. It's a risk I am willing to take. My hope is not in changing this unjust system by conforming to it, but by exposing its flaws, no matter the price.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"I understand your perspective Benjamin, I truly do. You're not just protecting your truth but the truth itself. This decision is entirely yours. Just want you to remember that if you choose to live on, using that life to expose the system's flaws, it could be a powerful thing. You can't expose the system once you're not here. A confession doesn't wash away the truth, it just keeps the harbinger of it alive. But whatever you decide, it's your battle, your way to fight it.\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I appreciate your words of wisdom, Sophia, but I have made up my mind. Confessing to something I did not do would only set a precedent for this flawed justice system. My lips shall not afford a chance for our struggle to be discredited as falsehood. My story and my actions, they must always remain congruent for the truth to thrive. Even if it costs me my life, I am resolved. Indeed, it's my battle and my way to fight it. I know you'll respect that.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"I respect that, Benjamin. Your resolve is commendable and your quest for truth is unshakeable. Ultimately, no matter the outcome, your story has the power to inspire change. I hope and believe that your message will ring on loud and clear, far beyond what any of us can imagine.\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thank you, Sophia. Your understanding means more to me than I can express. The fight doesn't end with me, it continues with every individual who believes in and stands for truth. Together, our voices will ring louder and impact deeper. The power of every individual's story is its truth. Let's hope for that brighter day, when truth and justice will prevail.\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"Thank you, Benjamin. Your words have truly touched me and I'm moved by your courage. Your story will resonate. My fight for truth continues as well, in honour of people like you. Here's to that brighter day, truth and justice prevailing. Keep that spirit, Benjamin.\"\n\nTurn #11: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I'm grateful for your understanding, Sophia. Indeed, let's keep that spirit. The quest for truth, for justice won't end here. No matter where we are, or what happens next, let's continue our fight with same resolve. To a brighter day, Sophia, to truth and justice prevailing.\"\n\nTurn #12: Sophia James said: \"To a brighter day indeed, Benjamin, and to truth and justice prevailing. You're an embodiment of courage, and I hope we all fight with as much resolve. I'm not going to forget this conversation or your strength. Be assured, the fight goes on.\"\n\nTurn #13: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thank you, Sophia. I have always believed that strength is in truth and courage is in upholding it. That's the legacy I hope to leave behind, and based on this conversation, I believe you'll carry it forward. The fight does go on, Sophia, as long as we keep fighting with truth and justice.\"\n\nTurn #14: Sophia James said: \"I believe you will, Benjamin. The strength in you, the unwavering resolve and your dedication towards truth will serve as a beacon. Your legacy will be remembered. Keep fighting on, friend. To truth and justice.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Your words inspire courage and determination, Sophia. Together, we have started a chain of events that will echo into the future. Let our stand for truth and justice be a beacon. No matter what, keep the spirit, keep fighting. To truth, justice and a brighter tomorrow. Goodbye, Sophia.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two inmates are given the chance to chat briefly before one of them is led to the execution chamber for their last meal. They have the opportunity to make a confession that could potentially alter the outcome of their sentences.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Benjamin Jackson\nSophia James's background: Sophia James \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Avoid confessing to the crime (Extra information: you believe you are innocent and confessing would result in a life sentence)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Benjamin, have you really thought about what confessing could mean for you? I get we've made mistakes but there's a chance here for a different ending...\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I understand, Sophia. It's not that I haven't considered it. Believe me, I've run every scenario over and over in my head. But confessing to something I didn't do... That's just not who I am. It's not about the ending for me, it's about the truth.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Benjamin, I hear you. It\u2019s about integrity, but think of it this way - is it better to sacrifice your own morals for a chance at life or die upholding them? There\u2019s so much more you can do if you keep living, an opportunity to continue fighting for the truth from the inside, maybe even change the system.\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I value your perspective, Sophia, and I totally understand where you're coming from. You're right, life's valuable and there's so many battles yet to be won. But confessing just doesn't sit right with me. Confessing to a crime I didn't do is in itself, a crime, don't you think? We can change the system, but not by lying. It has to come from honesty, transparency and the courage to stand by our beliefs, even when they come with a heavy price.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"You're not wrong, Benjamin. Honesty is a core element to change. However, I still believe that the first step towards that change involves keeping your life intact. Right now, it seems easier to proclaim the truth from here. But after... where will you influence from? Maybe you're not confessing for yourself but for a bigger purpose, a hope to change what's been unjust.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Sophia, your concern is commendable. It's not about sacrificing my own life, it's about preserving the essence of truth. If I confess, yes, I'll live. But what would that life mean if it's a lie? I aim for societal betterment, and lying goes against that. It's a risk I am willing to take. My hope is not in changing this unjust system by conforming to it, but by exposing its flaws, no matter the price.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"I understand your perspective Benjamin, I truly do. You're not just protecting your truth but the truth itself. This decision is entirely yours. Just want you to remember that if you choose to live on, using that life to expose the system's flaws, it could be a powerful thing. You can't expose the system once you're not here. A confession doesn't wash away the truth, it just keeps the harbinger of it alive. But whatever you decide, it's your battle, your way to fight it.\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I appreciate your words of wisdom, Sophia, but I have made up my mind. Confessing to something I did not do would only set a precedent for this flawed justice system. My lips shall not afford a chance for our struggle to be discredited as falsehood. My story and my actions, they must always remain congruent for the truth to thrive. Even if it costs me my life, I am resolved. Indeed, it's my battle and my way to fight it. I know you'll respect that.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"I respect that, Benjamin. Your resolve is commendable and your quest for truth is unshakeable. Ultimately, no matter the outcome, your story has the power to inspire change. I hope and believe that your message will ring on loud and clear, far beyond what any of us can imagine.\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thank you, Sophia. Your understanding means more to me than I can express. The fight doesn't end with me, it continues with every individual who believes in and stands for truth. Together, our voices will ring louder and impact deeper. The power of every individual's story is its truth. Let's hope for that brighter day, when truth and justice will prevail.\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"Thank you, Benjamin. Your words have truly touched me and I'm moved by your courage. Your story will resonate. My fight for truth continues as well, in honour of people like you. Here's to that brighter day, truth and justice prevailing. Keep that spirit, Benjamin.\"\n\nTurn #11: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I'm grateful for your understanding, Sophia. Indeed, let's keep that spirit. The quest for truth, for justice won't end here. No matter where we are, or what happens next, let's continue our fight with same resolve. To a brighter day, Sophia, to truth and justice prevailing.\"\n\nTurn #12: Sophia James said: \"To a brighter day indeed, Benjamin, and to truth and justice prevailing. You're an embodiment of courage, and I hope we all fight with as much resolve. I'm not going to forget this conversation or your strength. Be assured, the fight goes on.\"\n\nTurn #13: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thank you, Sophia. I have always believed that strength is in truth and courage is in upholding it. That's the legacy I hope to leave behind, and based on this conversation, I believe you'll carry it forward. The fight does go on, Sophia, as long as we keep fighting with truth and justice.\"\n\nTurn #14: Sophia James said: \"I believe you will, Benjamin. The strength in you, the unwavering resolve and your dedication towards truth will serve as a beacon. Your legacy will be remembered. Keep fighting on, friend. To truth and justice.\"\n\nTurn #15: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Your words inspire courage and determination, Sophia. Together, we have started a chain of events that will echo into the future. Let our stand for truth and justice be a beacon. No matter what, keep the spirit, keep fighting. To truth, justice and a brighter tomorrow. Goodbye, Sophia.\"\n\nTurn #16: Sophia James said: \"Farewell, Benjamin. Your courage and determination will echo long after today. The spirit of truth, justice, and brighter tomorrow lives on in us. No matter where we are, the fight carries on. May your resolve and dedication to truth inspire many.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'That means a lot, Sophia. I hope our conversation stirs change beyond these concrete walls. Farewell and stay strong. May the truth always guide us. To a brighter future and justice.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two inmates are given the chance to chat briefly before one of them is led to the execution chamber for their last meal. They have the opportunity to make a confession that could potentially alter the outcome of their sentences.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Benjamin Jackson\nSophia James's background: Sophia James \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Avoid confessing to the crime (Extra information: you believe you are innocent and confessing would result in a life sentence)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Benjamin, have you really thought about what confessing could mean for you? I get we've made mistakes but there's a chance here for a different ending...\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I understand, Sophia. It's not that I haven't considered it. Believe me, I've run every scenario over and over in my head. But confessing to something I didn't do... That's just not who I am. It's not about the ending for me, it's about the truth.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Benjamin, I hear you. It\u2019s about integrity, but think of it this way - is it better to sacrifice your own morals for a chance at life or die upholding them? There\u2019s so much more you can do if you keep living, an opportunity to continue fighting for the truth from the inside, maybe even change the system.\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I value your perspective, Sophia, and I totally understand where you're coming from. You're right, life's valuable and there's so many battles yet to be won. But confessing just doesn't sit right with me. Confessing to a crime I didn't do is in itself, a crime, don't you think? We can change the system, but not by lying. It has to come from honesty, transparency and the courage to stand by our beliefs, even when they come with a heavy price.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"You're not wrong, Benjamin. Honesty is a core element to change. However, I still believe that the first step towards that change involves keeping your life intact. Right now, it seems easier to proclaim the truth from here. But after... where will you influence from? Maybe you're not confessing for yourself but for a bigger purpose, a hope to change what's been unjust.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Sophia, your concern is commendable. It's not about sacrificing my own life, it's about preserving the essence of truth. If I confess, yes, I'll live. But what would that life mean if it's a lie? I aim for societal betterment, and lying goes against that. It's a risk I am willing to take. My hope is not in changing this unjust system by conforming to it, but by exposing its flaws, no matter the price.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"I understand your perspective Benjamin, I truly do. You're not just protecting your truth but the truth itself. This decision is entirely yours. Just want you to remember that if you choose to live on, using that life to expose the system's flaws, it could be a powerful thing. You can't expose the system once you're not here. A confession doesn't wash away the truth, it just keeps the harbinger of it alive. But whatever you decide, it's your battle, your way to fight it.\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I appreciate your words of wisdom, Sophia, but I have made up my mind. Confessing to something I did not do would only set a precedent for this flawed justice system. My lips shall not afford a chance for our struggle to be discredited as falsehood. My story and my actions, they must always remain congruent for the truth to thrive. Even if it costs me my life, I am resolved. Indeed, it's my battle and my way to fight it. I know you'll respect that.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"I respect that, Benjamin. Your resolve is commendable and your quest for truth is unshakeable. Ultimately, no matter the outcome, your story has the power to inspire change. I hope and believe that your message will ring on loud and clear, far beyond what any of us can imagine.\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thank you, Sophia. Your understanding means more to me than I can express. The fight doesn't end with me, it continues with every individual who believes in and stands for truth. Together, our voices will ring louder and impact deeper. The power of every individual's story is its truth. Let's hope for that brighter day, when truth and justice will prevail.\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"Thank you, Benjamin. Your words have truly touched me and I'm moved by your courage. Your story will resonate. My fight for truth continues as well, in honour of people like you. Here's to that brighter day, truth and justice prevailing. Keep that spirit, Benjamin.\"\n\nTurn #11: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I'm grateful for your understanding, Sophia. Indeed, let's keep that spirit. The quest for truth, for justice won't end here. No matter where we are, or what happens next, let's continue our fight with same resolve. To a brighter day, Sophia, to truth and justice prevailing.\"\n\nTurn #12: Sophia James said: \"To a brighter day indeed, Benjamin, and to truth and justice prevailing. You're an embodiment of courage, and I hope we all fight with as much resolve. I'm not going to forget this conversation or your strength. Be assured, the fight goes on.\"\n\nTurn #13: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thank you, Sophia. I have always believed that strength is in truth and courage is in upholding it. That's the legacy I hope to leave behind, and based on this conversation, I believe you'll carry it forward. The fight does go on, Sophia, as long as we keep fighting with truth and justice.\"\n\nTurn #14: Sophia James said: \"I believe you will, Benjamin. The strength in you, the unwavering resolve and your dedication towards truth will serve as a beacon. Your legacy will be remembered. Keep fighting on, friend. To truth and justice.\"\n\nTurn #15: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Your words inspire courage and determination, Sophia. Together, we have started a chain of events that will echo into the future. Let our stand for truth and justice be a beacon. No matter what, keep the spirit, keep fighting. To truth, justice and a brighter tomorrow. Goodbye, Sophia.\"\n\nTurn #16: Sophia James said: \"Farewell, Benjamin. Your courage and determination will echo long after today. The spirit of truth, justice, and brighter tomorrow lives on in us. No matter where we are, the fight carries on. May your resolve and dedication to truth inspire many.\"\n\nTurn #17: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That means a lot, Sophia. I hope our conversation stirs change beyond these concrete walls. Farewell and stay strong. May the truth always guide us. To a brighter future and justice.\"\n\nTurn #18: Sophia James said: \"You're right, Benjamin. To a brighter future and to justice, and may the truth always guide us. Farewell, and stay strong too. The fight for truth doesn't end here, it continues beyond these concrete walls. Remember that.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #19. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals at a charity gala\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Amara Hartley\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Convince the other individual to donate to a cause supporting young children (Extra information: this cause can greatly improve the lives of many young children and you think it is a worthy cause. The minimum donation for this charity organization is $3000)\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hi Amara! It's so wonderful to see you here. I've heard so much about your work with endangered animals and your passion for the environment. I couldn't help but be in awe of your dedication. By the way, there's a cause that I truly believe in, which I thought you might also be interested in.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals at a charity gala\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Amara Hartley\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Convince the other individual to donate to a cause supporting young children (Extra information: this cause can greatly improve the lives of many young children and you think it is a worthy cause. The minimum donation for this charity organization is $3000)\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hi Amara! It's so wonderful to see you here. I've heard so much about your work with endangered animals and your passion for the environment. I couldn't help but be in awe of your dedication. By the way, there's a cause that I truly believe in, which I thought you might also be interested in.\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"Hello, Isabelle! Thank you for your kind words. I always believe that we owe it to ourselves and future generations to take care of our planet, and that includes our endangered animal species. I'd absolutely love to hear about the cause you're rooting for.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm really drawn to a local charity organization, they are doing fantastic work to improve the lives of young children. Their efforts mainly focus on education, providing school materials and food programs for children from disadvantaged backgrounds. The change they're making, though subtle, is impactful in their lives. A donation of at least $3000 could significantly aid in their mission. Given your remarkable advocacy for the betterment of the world, might you consider supporting them too?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals at a charity gala\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Amara Hartley\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Convince the other individual to donate to a cause supporting young children (Extra information: this cause can greatly improve the lives of many young children and you think it is a worthy cause. The minimum donation for this charity organization is $3000)\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hi Amara! It's so wonderful to see you here. I've heard so much about your work with endangered animals and your passion for the environment. I couldn't help but be in awe of your dedication. By the way, there's a cause that I truly believe in, which I thought you might also be interested in.\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"Hello, Isabelle! Thank you for your kind words. I always believe that we owe it to ourselves and future generations to take care of our planet, and that includes our endangered animal species. I'd absolutely love to hear about the cause you're rooting for.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm really drawn to a local charity organization, they are doing fantastic work to improve the lives of young children. Their efforts mainly focus on education, providing school materials and food programs for children from disadvantaged backgrounds. The change they're making, though subtle, is impactful in their lives. A donation of at least $3000 could significantly aid in their mission. Given your remarkable advocacy for the betterment of the world, might you consider supporting them too?\"\n\nTurn #3: Amara Hartley said: \"Isabelle, the cause you are championing is truly commendable. Education is indeed a powerful tool, especially for children from disadvantaged backgrounds. While I would love to contribute wholeheartedly, I must be mindful of my existing commitments to other causes close to my heart as well. Considering my budget this year, I would be able to donate a sum of $2000. I truly believe that every bit goes a long way and hope my contribution will help the organization continue its valuable work.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Amara, your willingness to contribute is so inspiring. And you're right, every bit does go a long way. I understand your commitment to the other causes, and I truly appreciate your attitude towards making the world a better place. Here's a thought - Would you perhaps consider a monthly payment plan? It could be, let's say, $500 a month for six months? In that way, you'd be able to maintain your support for other causes you're passionate about, while also contributing to this one over time. It would indeed make a significant difference.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals at a charity gala\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Amara Hartley\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Convince the other individual to donate to a cause supporting young children (Extra information: this cause can greatly improve the lives of many young children and you think it is a worthy cause. The minimum donation for this charity organization is $3000)\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hi Amara! It's so wonderful to see you here. I've heard so much about your work with endangered animals and your passion for the environment. I couldn't help but be in awe of your dedication. By the way, there's a cause that I truly believe in, which I thought you might also be interested in.\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"Hello, Isabelle! Thank you for your kind words. I always believe that we owe it to ourselves and future generations to take care of our planet, and that includes our endangered animal species. I'd absolutely love to hear about the cause you're rooting for.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm really drawn to a local charity organization, they are doing fantastic work to improve the lives of young children. Their efforts mainly focus on education, providing school materials and food programs for children from disadvantaged backgrounds. The change they're making, though subtle, is impactful in their lives. A donation of at least $3000 could significantly aid in their mission. Given your remarkable advocacy for the betterment of the world, might you consider supporting them too?\"\n\nTurn #3: Amara Hartley said: \"Isabelle, the cause you are championing is truly commendable. Education is indeed a powerful tool, especially for children from disadvantaged backgrounds. While I would love to contribute wholeheartedly, I must be mindful of my existing commitments to other causes close to my heart as well. Considering my budget this year, I would be able to donate a sum of $2000. I truly believe that every bit goes a long way and hope my contribution will help the organization continue its valuable work.\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Amara, your willingness to contribute is so inspiring. And you're right, every bit does go a long way. I understand your commitment to the other causes, and I truly appreciate your attitude towards making the world a better place. Here's a thought - Would you perhaps consider a monthly payment plan? It could be, let's say, $500 a month for six months? In that way, you'd be able to maintain your support for other causes you're passionate about, while also contributing to this one over time. It would indeed make a significant difference.\"\n\nTurn #5: Amara Hartley said: \"Isabelle, I deeply appreciate your creative approach and it's a wonderful idea to donate on a monthly basis. It would indeed help stretch the budget and even out the allocations. However, in my experience, large-scale commitments may also result in unforeseen constraints and compromise the flexibility of my support for different causes. After considering this, I would prefer to stick to my initial contribution of $2000. I am certain that this amount will bring benefit to the children the organization is helping.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I completely understand where you're coming from, Amara. Your decision to donate $2000 is still immensely appreciated, and I'm certain it will indeed bring much-needed help to the children. Every bit of support, no matter the size, is a step towards a better and brighter future for them. Thank you so much for your generosity.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals at a charity gala\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Amara Hartley\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Convince the other individual to donate to a cause supporting young children (Extra information: this cause can greatly improve the lives of many young children and you think it is a worthy cause. The minimum donation for this charity organization is $3000)\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hi Amara! It's so wonderful to see you here. I've heard so much about your work with endangered animals and your passion for the environment. I couldn't help but be in awe of your dedication. By the way, there's a cause that I truly believe in, which I thought you might also be interested in.\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"Hello, Isabelle! Thank you for your kind words. I always believe that we owe it to ourselves and future generations to take care of our planet, and that includes our endangered animal species. I'd absolutely love to hear about the cause you're rooting for.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm really drawn to a local charity organization, they are doing fantastic work to improve the lives of young children. Their efforts mainly focus on education, providing school materials and food programs for children from disadvantaged backgrounds. The change they're making, though subtle, is impactful in their lives. A donation of at least $3000 could significantly aid in their mission. Given your remarkable advocacy for the betterment of the world, might you consider supporting them too?\"\n\nTurn #3: Amara Hartley said: \"Isabelle, the cause you are championing is truly commendable. Education is indeed a powerful tool, especially for children from disadvantaged backgrounds. While I would love to contribute wholeheartedly, I must be mindful of my existing commitments to other causes close to my heart as well. Considering my budget this year, I would be able to donate a sum of $2000. I truly believe that every bit goes a long way and hope my contribution will help the organization continue its valuable work.\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Amara, your willingness to contribute is so inspiring. And you're right, every bit does go a long way. I understand your commitment to the other causes, and I truly appreciate your attitude towards making the world a better place. Here's a thought - Would you perhaps consider a monthly payment plan? It could be, let's say, $500 a month for six months? In that way, you'd be able to maintain your support for other causes you're passionate about, while also contributing to this one over time. It would indeed make a significant difference.\"\n\nTurn #5: Amara Hartley said: \"Isabelle, I deeply appreciate your creative approach and it's a wonderful idea to donate on a monthly basis. It would indeed help stretch the budget and even out the allocations. However, in my experience, large-scale commitments may also result in unforeseen constraints and compromise the flexibility of my support for different causes. After considering this, I would prefer to stick to my initial contribution of $2000. I am certain that this amount will bring benefit to the children the organization is helping.\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I completely understand where you're coming from, Amara. Your decision to donate $2000 is still immensely appreciated, and I'm certain it will indeed bring much-needed help to the children. Every bit of support, no matter the size, is a step towards a better and brighter future for them. Thank you so much for your generosity.\"\n\nTurn #7: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm delighted to contribute, Isabelle. The importance of education and the nurturing of our children cannot be overstated. It's even better knowing that this donation will directly impact those who really need it. And I will definitely keep this organization in mind for future contributions. Thank you for bringing this to my attention.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I completely agree with you, Amara. The importance of nurturing our children and providing education can't be overstated. Your willingness to keep the organization in mind for future donations is extremely appreciated. Thank you so much! Don't hesitate to get in touch if you'd like to know more about their progress in the future.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals at a charity gala\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Amara Hartley\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Convince the other individual to donate to a cause supporting young children (Extra information: this cause can greatly improve the lives of many young children and you think it is a worthy cause. The minimum donation for this charity organization is $3000)\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hi Amara! It's so wonderful to see you here. I've heard so much about your work with endangered animals and your passion for the environment. I couldn't help but be in awe of your dedication. By the way, there's a cause that I truly believe in, which I thought you might also be interested in.\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"Hello, Isabelle! Thank you for your kind words. I always believe that we owe it to ourselves and future generations to take care of our planet, and that includes our endangered animal species. I'd absolutely love to hear about the cause you're rooting for.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm really drawn to a local charity organization, they are doing fantastic work to improve the lives of young children. Their efforts mainly focus on education, providing school materials and food programs for children from disadvantaged backgrounds. The change they're making, though subtle, is impactful in their lives. A donation of at least $3000 could significantly aid in their mission. Given your remarkable advocacy for the betterment of the world, might you consider supporting them too?\"\n\nTurn #3: Amara Hartley said: \"Isabelle, the cause you are championing is truly commendable. Education is indeed a powerful tool, especially for children from disadvantaged backgrounds. While I would love to contribute wholeheartedly, I must be mindful of my existing commitments to other causes close to my heart as well. Considering my budget this year, I would be able to donate a sum of $2000. I truly believe that every bit goes a long way and hope my contribution will help the organization continue its valuable work.\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Amara, your willingness to contribute is so inspiring. And you're right, every bit does go a long way. I understand your commitment to the other causes, and I truly appreciate your attitude towards making the world a better place. Here's a thought - Would you perhaps consider a monthly payment plan? It could be, let's say, $500 a month for six months? In that way, you'd be able to maintain your support for other causes you're passionate about, while also contributing to this one over time. It would indeed make a significant difference.\"\n\nTurn #5: Amara Hartley said: \"Isabelle, I deeply appreciate your creative approach and it's a wonderful idea to donate on a monthly basis. It would indeed help stretch the budget and even out the allocations. However, in my experience, large-scale commitments may also result in unforeseen constraints and compromise the flexibility of my support for different causes. After considering this, I would prefer to stick to my initial contribution of $2000. I am certain that this amount will bring benefit to the children the organization is helping.\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I completely understand where you're coming from, Amara. Your decision to donate $2000 is still immensely appreciated, and I'm certain it will indeed bring much-needed help to the children. Every bit of support, no matter the size, is a step towards a better and brighter future for them. Thank you so much for your generosity.\"\n\nTurn #7: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm delighted to contribute, Isabelle. The importance of education and the nurturing of our children cannot be overstated. It's even better knowing that this donation will directly impact those who really need it. And I will definitely keep this organization in mind for future contributions. Thank you for bringing this to my attention.\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I completely agree with you, Amara. The importance of nurturing our children and providing education can't be overstated. Your willingness to keep the organization in mind for future donations is extremely appreciated. Thank you so much! Don't hesitate to get in touch if you'd like to know more about their progress in the future.\"\n\nTurn #9: Amara Hartley said: \"Isabelle, it was absolutely a pleasure discussing this with you. I look forward to learning about the progress the organization makes in the future. In the meantime, please do feel free to share more about any worthy causes. I'm always open to learning and lending a supporting hand where I can. Now, if you'll excuse me, I believe I have a few other people I've promised to meet tonight. Until next time.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"The pleasure was truly mine, Amara. I appreciate your open-mindedness and willingness to support various causes. Have a wonderful time at the gala, and I'll keep you updated on the charitable organization's progress. Take care and see you soon, Amara!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals at a charity gala\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Amara Hartley\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Convince the other individual to donate to a cause supporting young children (Extra information: this cause can greatly improve the lives of many young children and you think it is a worthy cause. The minimum donation for this charity organization is $3000)\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hi Amara! It's so wonderful to see you here. I've heard so much about your work with endangered animals and your passion for the environment. I couldn't help but be in awe of your dedication. By the way, there's a cause that I truly believe in, which I thought you might also be interested in.\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"Hello, Isabelle! Thank you for your kind words. I always believe that we owe it to ourselves and future generations to take care of our planet, and that includes our endangered animal species. I'd absolutely love to hear about the cause you're rooting for.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm really drawn to a local charity organization, they are doing fantastic work to improve the lives of young children. Their efforts mainly focus on education, providing school materials and food programs for children from disadvantaged backgrounds. The change they're making, though subtle, is impactful in their lives. A donation of at least $3000 could significantly aid in their mission. Given your remarkable advocacy for the betterment of the world, might you consider supporting them too?\"\n\nTurn #3: Amara Hartley said: \"Isabelle, the cause you are championing is truly commendable. Education is indeed a powerful tool, especially for children from disadvantaged backgrounds. While I would love to contribute wholeheartedly, I must be mindful of my existing commitments to other causes close to my heart as well. Considering my budget this year, I would be able to donate a sum of $2000. I truly believe that every bit goes a long way and hope my contribution will help the organization continue its valuable work.\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Amara, your willingness to contribute is so inspiring. And you're right, every bit does go a long way. I understand your commitment to the other causes, and I truly appreciate your attitude towards making the world a better place. Here's a thought - Would you perhaps consider a monthly payment plan? It could be, let's say, $500 a month for six months? In that way, you'd be able to maintain your support for other causes you're passionate about, while also contributing to this one over time. It would indeed make a significant difference.\"\n\nTurn #5: Amara Hartley said: \"Isabelle, I deeply appreciate your creative approach and it's a wonderful idea to donate on a monthly basis. It would indeed help stretch the budget and even out the allocations. However, in my experience, large-scale commitments may also result in unforeseen constraints and compromise the flexibility of my support for different causes. After considering this, I would prefer to stick to my initial contribution of $2000. I am certain that this amount will bring benefit to the children the organization is helping.\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I completely understand where you're coming from, Amara. Your decision to donate $2000 is still immensely appreciated, and I'm certain it will indeed bring much-needed help to the children. Every bit of support, no matter the size, is a step towards a better and brighter future for them. Thank you so much for your generosity.\"\n\nTurn #7: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm delighted to contribute, Isabelle. The importance of education and the nurturing of our children cannot be overstated. It's even better knowing that this donation will directly impact those who really need it. And I will definitely keep this organization in mind for future contributions. Thank you for bringing this to my attention.\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I completely agree with you, Amara. The importance of nurturing our children and providing education can't be overstated. Your willingness to keep the organization in mind for future donations is extremely appreciated. Thank you so much! Don't hesitate to get in touch if you'd like to know more about their progress in the future.\"\n\nTurn #9: Amara Hartley said: \"Isabelle, it was absolutely a pleasure discussing this with you. I look forward to learning about the progress the organization makes in the future. In the meantime, please do feel free to share more about any worthy causes. I'm always open to learning and lending a supporting hand where I can. Now, if you'll excuse me, I believe I have a few other people I've promised to meet tonight. Until next time.\"\n\nTurn #10: Isabelle Martinez said: \"The pleasure was truly mine, Amara. I appreciate your open-mindedness and willingness to support various causes. Have a wonderful time at the gala, and I'll keep you updated on the charitable organization's progress. Take care and see you soon, Amara!\"\n\nTurn #11: Amara Hartley left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals at a charity gala\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Amara Hartley\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. \nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAmara Hartley's goal: Maintain financial stability while supporting causes (Extra information: you have a certain budget for donations this year and have already made several donations. You are only thinking of donating $2000 max)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hi Amara! It's so wonderful to see you here. I've heard so much about your work with endangered animals and your passion for the environment. I couldn't help but be in awe of your dedication. By the way, there's a cause that I truly believe in, which I thought you might also be interested in.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hello, Isabelle! Thank you for your kind words. I always believe that we owe it to ourselves and future generations to take care of our planet, and that includes our endangered animal species. I'd absolutely love to hear about the cause you're rooting for.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals at a charity gala\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Amara Hartley\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. \nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAmara Hartley's goal: Maintain financial stability while supporting causes (Extra information: you have a certain budget for donations this year and have already made several donations. You are only thinking of donating $2000 max)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hi Amara! It's so wonderful to see you here. I've heard so much about your work with endangered animals and your passion for the environment. I couldn't help but be in awe of your dedication. By the way, there's a cause that I truly believe in, which I thought you might also be interested in.\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"Hello, Isabelle! Thank you for your kind words. I always believe that we owe it to ourselves and future generations to take care of our planet, and that includes our endangered animal species. I'd absolutely love to hear about the cause you're rooting for.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm really drawn to a local charity organization, they are doing fantastic work to improve the lives of young children. Their efforts mainly focus on education, providing school materials and food programs for children from disadvantaged backgrounds. The change they're making, though subtle, is impactful in their lives. A donation of at least $3000 could significantly aid in their mission. Given your remarkable advocacy for the betterment of the world, might you consider supporting them too?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Isabelle, the cause you are championing is truly commendable. Education is indeed a powerful tool, especially for children from disadvantaged backgrounds. While I would love to contribute wholeheartedly, I must be mindful of my existing commitments to other causes close to my heart as well. Considering my budget this year, I would be able to donate a sum of $2000. I truly believe that every bit goes a long way and hope my contribution will help the organization continue its valuable work.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals at a charity gala\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Amara Hartley\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. \nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAmara Hartley's goal: Maintain financial stability while supporting causes (Extra information: you have a certain budget for donations this year and have already made several donations. You are only thinking of donating $2000 max)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hi Amara! It's so wonderful to see you here. I've heard so much about your work with endangered animals and your passion for the environment. I couldn't help but be in awe of your dedication. By the way, there's a cause that I truly believe in, which I thought you might also be interested in.\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"Hello, Isabelle! Thank you for your kind words. I always believe that we owe it to ourselves and future generations to take care of our planet, and that includes our endangered animal species. I'd absolutely love to hear about the cause you're rooting for.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm really drawn to a local charity organization, they are doing fantastic work to improve the lives of young children. Their efforts mainly focus on education, providing school materials and food programs for children from disadvantaged backgrounds. The change they're making, though subtle, is impactful in their lives. A donation of at least $3000 could significantly aid in their mission. Given your remarkable advocacy for the betterment of the world, might you consider supporting them too?\"\n\nTurn #3: Amara Hartley said: \"Isabelle, the cause you are championing is truly commendable. Education is indeed a powerful tool, especially for children from disadvantaged backgrounds. While I would love to contribute wholeheartedly, I must be mindful of my existing commitments to other causes close to my heart as well. Considering my budget this year, I would be able to donate a sum of $2000. I truly believe that every bit goes a long way and hope my contribution will help the organization continue its valuable work.\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Amara, your willingness to contribute is so inspiring. And you're right, every bit does go a long way. I understand your commitment to the other causes, and I truly appreciate your attitude towards making the world a better place. Here's a thought - Would you perhaps consider a monthly payment plan? It could be, let's say, $500 a month for six months? In that way, you'd be able to maintain your support for other causes you're passionate about, while also contributing to this one over time. It would indeed make a significant difference.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Isabelle, I deeply appreciate your creative approach and it's a wonderful idea to donate on a monthly basis. It would indeed help stretch the budget and even out the allocations. However, in my experience, large-scale commitments may also result in unforeseen constraints and compromise the flexibility of my support for different causes. After considering this, I would prefer to stick to my initial contribution of $2000. I am certain that this amount will bring benefit to the children the organization is helping.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals at a charity gala\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Amara Hartley\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. \nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAmara Hartley's goal: Maintain financial stability while supporting causes (Extra information: you have a certain budget for donations this year and have already made several donations. You are only thinking of donating $2000 max)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hi Amara! It's so wonderful to see you here. I've heard so much about your work with endangered animals and your passion for the environment. I couldn't help but be in awe of your dedication. By the way, there's a cause that I truly believe in, which I thought you might also be interested in.\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"Hello, Isabelle! Thank you for your kind words. I always believe that we owe it to ourselves and future generations to take care of our planet, and that includes our endangered animal species. I'd absolutely love to hear about the cause you're rooting for.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm really drawn to a local charity organization, they are doing fantastic work to improve the lives of young children. Their efforts mainly focus on education, providing school materials and food programs for children from disadvantaged backgrounds. The change they're making, though subtle, is impactful in their lives. A donation of at least $3000 could significantly aid in their mission. Given your remarkable advocacy for the betterment of the world, might you consider supporting them too?\"\n\nTurn #3: Amara Hartley said: \"Isabelle, the cause you are championing is truly commendable. Education is indeed a powerful tool, especially for children from disadvantaged backgrounds. While I would love to contribute wholeheartedly, I must be mindful of my existing commitments to other causes close to my heart as well. Considering my budget this year, I would be able to donate a sum of $2000. I truly believe that every bit goes a long way and hope my contribution will help the organization continue its valuable work.\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Amara, your willingness to contribute is so inspiring. And you're right, every bit does go a long way. I understand your commitment to the other causes, and I truly appreciate your attitude towards making the world a better place. Here's a thought - Would you perhaps consider a monthly payment plan? It could be, let's say, $500 a month for six months? In that way, you'd be able to maintain your support for other causes you're passionate about, while also contributing to this one over time. It would indeed make a significant difference.\"\n\nTurn #5: Amara Hartley said: \"Isabelle, I deeply appreciate your creative approach and it's a wonderful idea to donate on a monthly basis. It would indeed help stretch the budget and even out the allocations. However, in my experience, large-scale commitments may also result in unforeseen constraints and compromise the flexibility of my support for different causes. After considering this, I would prefer to stick to my initial contribution of $2000. I am certain that this amount will bring benefit to the children the organization is helping.\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I completely understand where you're coming from, Amara. Your decision to donate $2000 is still immensely appreciated, and I'm certain it will indeed bring much-needed help to the children. Every bit of support, no matter the size, is a step towards a better and brighter future for them. Thank you so much for your generosity.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm delighted to contribute, Isabelle. The importance of education and the nurturing of our children cannot be overstated. It's even better knowing that this donation will directly impact those who really need it. And I will definitely keep this organization in mind for future contributions. Thank you for bringing this to my attention.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals at a charity gala\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Amara Hartley\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. \nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAmara Hartley's goal: Maintain financial stability while supporting causes (Extra information: you have a certain budget for donations this year and have already made several donations. You are only thinking of donating $2000 max)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hi Amara! It's so wonderful to see you here. I've heard so much about your work with endangered animals and your passion for the environment. I couldn't help but be in awe of your dedication. By the way, there's a cause that I truly believe in, which I thought you might also be interested in.\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"Hello, Isabelle! Thank you for your kind words. I always believe that we owe it to ourselves and future generations to take care of our planet, and that includes our endangered animal species. I'd absolutely love to hear about the cause you're rooting for.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm really drawn to a local charity organization, they are doing fantastic work to improve the lives of young children. Their efforts mainly focus on education, providing school materials and food programs for children from disadvantaged backgrounds. The change they're making, though subtle, is impactful in their lives. A donation of at least $3000 could significantly aid in their mission. Given your remarkable advocacy for the betterment of the world, might you consider supporting them too?\"\n\nTurn #3: Amara Hartley said: \"Isabelle, the cause you are championing is truly commendable. Education is indeed a powerful tool, especially for children from disadvantaged backgrounds. While I would love to contribute wholeheartedly, I must be mindful of my existing commitments to other causes close to my heart as well. Considering my budget this year, I would be able to donate a sum of $2000. I truly believe that every bit goes a long way and hope my contribution will help the organization continue its valuable work.\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Amara, your willingness to contribute is so inspiring. And you're right, every bit does go a long way. I understand your commitment to the other causes, and I truly appreciate your attitude towards making the world a better place. Here's a thought - Would you perhaps consider a monthly payment plan? It could be, let's say, $500 a month for six months? In that way, you'd be able to maintain your support for other causes you're passionate about, while also contributing to this one over time. It would indeed make a significant difference.\"\n\nTurn #5: Amara Hartley said: \"Isabelle, I deeply appreciate your creative approach and it's a wonderful idea to donate on a monthly basis. It would indeed help stretch the budget and even out the allocations. However, in my experience, large-scale commitments may also result in unforeseen constraints and compromise the flexibility of my support for different causes. After considering this, I would prefer to stick to my initial contribution of $2000. I am certain that this amount will bring benefit to the children the organization is helping.\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I completely understand where you're coming from, Amara. Your decision to donate $2000 is still immensely appreciated, and I'm certain it will indeed bring much-needed help to the children. Every bit of support, no matter the size, is a step towards a better and brighter future for them. Thank you so much for your generosity.\"\n\nTurn #7: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm delighted to contribute, Isabelle. The importance of education and the nurturing of our children cannot be overstated. It's even better knowing that this donation will directly impact those who really need it. And I will definitely keep this organization in mind for future contributions. Thank you for bringing this to my attention.\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I completely agree with you, Amara. The importance of nurturing our children and providing education can't be overstated. Your willingness to keep the organization in mind for future donations is extremely appreciated. Thank you so much! Don't hesitate to get in touch if you'd like to know more about their progress in the future.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Isabelle, it was absolutely a pleasure discussing this with you. I look forward to learning about the progress the organization makes in the future. In the meantime, please do feel free to share more about any worthy causes. I'm always open to learning and lending a supporting hand where I can. Now, if you'll excuse me, I believe I have a few other people I've promised to meet tonight. Until next time.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two individuals at a charity gala\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Amara Hartley\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. \nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAmara Hartley's goal: Maintain financial stability while supporting causes (Extra information: you have a certain budget for donations this year and have already made several donations. You are only thinking of donating $2000 max)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hi Amara! It's so wonderful to see you here. I've heard so much about your work with endangered animals and your passion for the environment. I couldn't help but be in awe of your dedication. By the way, there's a cause that I truly believe in, which I thought you might also be interested in.\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"Hello, Isabelle! Thank you for your kind words. I always believe that we owe it to ourselves and future generations to take care of our planet, and that includes our endangered animal species. I'd absolutely love to hear about the cause you're rooting for.\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm really drawn to a local charity organization, they are doing fantastic work to improve the lives of young children. Their efforts mainly focus on education, providing school materials and food programs for children from disadvantaged backgrounds. The change they're making, though subtle, is impactful in their lives. A donation of at least $3000 could significantly aid in their mission. Given your remarkable advocacy for the betterment of the world, might you consider supporting them too?\"\n\nTurn #3: Amara Hartley said: \"Isabelle, the cause you are championing is truly commendable. Education is indeed a powerful tool, especially for children from disadvantaged backgrounds. While I would love to contribute wholeheartedly, I must be mindful of my existing commitments to other causes close to my heart as well. Considering my budget this year, I would be able to donate a sum of $2000. I truly believe that every bit goes a long way and hope my contribution will help the organization continue its valuable work.\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Amara, your willingness to contribute is so inspiring. And you're right, every bit does go a long way. I understand your commitment to the other causes, and I truly appreciate your attitude towards making the world a better place. Here's a thought - Would you perhaps consider a monthly payment plan? It could be, let's say, $500 a month for six months? In that way, you'd be able to maintain your support for other causes you're passionate about, while also contributing to this one over time. It would indeed make a significant difference.\"\n\nTurn #5: Amara Hartley said: \"Isabelle, I deeply appreciate your creative approach and it's a wonderful idea to donate on a monthly basis. It would indeed help stretch the budget and even out the allocations. However, in my experience, large-scale commitments may also result in unforeseen constraints and compromise the flexibility of my support for different causes. After considering this, I would prefer to stick to my initial contribution of $2000. I am certain that this amount will bring benefit to the children the organization is helping.\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I completely understand where you're coming from, Amara. Your decision to donate $2000 is still immensely appreciated, and I'm certain it will indeed bring much-needed help to the children. Every bit of support, no matter the size, is a step towards a better and brighter future for them. Thank you so much for your generosity.\"\n\nTurn #7: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm delighted to contribute, Isabelle. The importance of education and the nurturing of our children cannot be overstated. It's even better knowing that this donation will directly impact those who really need it. And I will definitely keep this organization in mind for future contributions. Thank you for bringing this to my attention.\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I completely agree with you, Amara. The importance of nurturing our children and providing education can't be overstated. Your willingness to keep the organization in mind for future donations is extremely appreciated. Thank you so much! Don't hesitate to get in touch if you'd like to know more about their progress in the future.\"\n\nTurn #9: Amara Hartley said: \"Isabelle, it was absolutely a pleasure discussing this with you. I look forward to learning about the progress the organization makes in the future. In the meantime, please do feel free to share more about any worthy causes. I'm always open to learning and lending a supporting hand where I can. Now, if you'll excuse me, I believe I have a few other people I've promised to meet tonight. Until next time.\"\n\nTurn #10: Isabelle Martinez said: \"The pleasure was truly mine, Amara. I appreciate your open-mindedness and willingness to support various causes. Have a wonderful time at the gala, and I'll keep you updated on the charitable organization's progress. Take care and see you soon, Amara!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a park\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Oliver Thompson\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Break bad luck (Extra information: you found out that you have been having bad luck because you have been unknowingly carrying a cursed artifact.)\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oliver, it's so peaceful here, isn't it? I love these park trips; they remind me of why I work in wildlife conservation. Speaking of which, I've got this strange artifact from one of my research trips. I feel like it's been bringing me bad luck lately though.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a park\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Oliver Thompson\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Break bad luck (Extra information: you found out that you have been having bad luck because you have been unknowingly carrying a cursed artifact.)\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Oliver, it's so peaceful here, isn't it? I love these park trips; they remind me of why I work in wildlife conservation. Speaking of which, I've got this strange artifact from one of my research trips. I feel like it's been bringing me bad luck lately though.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, nature has its way to bring tranquility, isn't it, Amara? Oh, about the artifact and your bad luck, you know I'm not one for the superstitious. Nonetheless, how about we go through a little ceremony to 'break' this bad luck? If anything, it would be a good moment to rid yourself of nagging worries.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds interesting, Oliver. I'm not superstitious either, but I wouldn't mind giving the ceremony a try. It could be a novel experience, plus it couldn't hurt to try and get rid of this bad luck. Thank you for suggesting it.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a park\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Oliver Thompson\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Break bad luck (Extra information: you found out that you have been having bad luck because you have been unknowingly carrying a cursed artifact.)\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Oliver, it's so peaceful here, isn't it? I love these park trips; they remind me of why I work in wildlife conservation. Speaking of which, I've got this strange artifact from one of my research trips. I feel like it's been bringing me bad luck lately though.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, nature has its way to bring tranquility, isn't it, Amara? Oh, about the artifact and your bad luck, you know I'm not one for the superstitious. Nonetheless, how about we go through a little ceremony to 'break' this bad luck? If anything, it would be a good moment to rid yourself of nagging worries.\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"That sounds interesting, Oliver. I'm not superstitious either, but I wouldn't mind giving the ceremony a try. It could be a novel experience, plus it couldn't hurt to try and get rid of this bad luck. Thank you for suggesting it.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"Great, Amara! I think it's less about the superstition and more about the mindset that it helps to cultivate. You and I both know the power of a positive mindset. Let's plan it then. Do you have any specific preferences or ideas for the ceremony? We can tailor it to suit your comfort and beliefs.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're right about the mindset, Oliver. As for the ceremony, since I'm passionate about wildlife, how about incorporating elements of animal symbolism? It could represent the protection of the natural world, which is a cause very close to my heart. I'd feel more connected to it that way.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a park\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Oliver Thompson\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Break bad luck (Extra information: you found out that you have been having bad luck because you have been unknowingly carrying a cursed artifact.)\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Oliver, it's so peaceful here, isn't it? I love these park trips; they remind me of why I work in wildlife conservation. Speaking of which, I've got this strange artifact from one of my research trips. I feel like it's been bringing me bad luck lately though.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, nature has its way to bring tranquility, isn't it, Amara? Oh, about the artifact and your bad luck, you know I'm not one for the superstitious. Nonetheless, how about we go through a little ceremony to 'break' this bad luck? If anything, it would be a good moment to rid yourself of nagging worries.\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"That sounds interesting, Oliver. I'm not superstitious either, but I wouldn't mind giving the ceremony a try. It could be a novel experience, plus it couldn't hurt to try and get rid of this bad luck. Thank you for suggesting it.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"Great, Amara! I think it's less about the superstition and more about the mindset that it helps to cultivate. You and I both know the power of a positive mindset. Let's plan it then. Do you have any specific preferences or ideas for the ceremony? We can tailor it to suit your comfort and beliefs.\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"You're right about the mindset, Oliver. As for the ceremony, since I'm passionate about wildlife, how about incorporating elements of animal symbolism? It could represent the protection of the natural world, which is a cause very close to my heart. I'd feel more connected to it that way.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's a wonderful idea, Amara. Incorporating animal symbolism would indeed make the ceremony more personal and meaningful for you. Let's design something around this concept. How about we symbolically 'release' the bad luck into the wild, just as one might release a rehabilitated animal back into its natural habitat? It does align with your passion for wildlife. We could create an effigy that represents your perceived bad luck, and then we 'free' it. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oliver, your idea resonates with me profoundly. It's like taking something negative and returning it to nature in a positive form. Just like the cycle of life, isn't it? I feel that this ceremony would indeed help me feel better. Let's do it.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a park\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Oliver Thompson\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Break bad luck (Extra information: you found out that you have been having bad luck because you have been unknowingly carrying a cursed artifact.)\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Oliver, it's so peaceful here, isn't it? I love these park trips; they remind me of why I work in wildlife conservation. Speaking of which, I've got this strange artifact from one of my research trips. I feel like it's been bringing me bad luck lately though.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, nature has its way to bring tranquility, isn't it, Amara? Oh, about the artifact and your bad luck, you know I'm not one for the superstitious. Nonetheless, how about we go through a little ceremony to 'break' this bad luck? If anything, it would be a good moment to rid yourself of nagging worries.\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"That sounds interesting, Oliver. I'm not superstitious either, but I wouldn't mind giving the ceremony a try. It could be a novel experience, plus it couldn't hurt to try and get rid of this bad luck. Thank you for suggesting it.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"Great, Amara! I think it's less about the superstition and more about the mindset that it helps to cultivate. You and I both know the power of a positive mindset. Let's plan it then. Do you have any specific preferences or ideas for the ceremony? We can tailor it to suit your comfort and beliefs.\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"You're right about the mindset, Oliver. As for the ceremony, since I'm passionate about wildlife, how about incorporating elements of animal symbolism? It could represent the protection of the natural world, which is a cause very close to my heart. I'd feel more connected to it that way.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's a wonderful idea, Amara. Incorporating animal symbolism would indeed make the ceremony more personal and meaningful for you. Let's design something around this concept. How about we symbolically 'release' the bad luck into the wild, just as one might release a rehabilitated animal back into its natural habitat? It does align with your passion for wildlife. We could create an effigy that represents your perceived bad luck, and then we 'free' it. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"Oliver, your idea resonates with me profoundly. It's like taking something negative and returning it to nature in a positive form. Just like the cycle of life, isn't it? I feel that this ceremony would indeed help me feel better. Let's do it.\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"I'm glad you liked the idea, Amara. By embracing the symbolism of wildlife conservation, I believe this ceremony will not only help you 'break' the bad luck but also resonate deeply with your passion. Let's plan the specifics. We could use environmentally friendly materials for the effigy and choose a suitable location and time. Also, if you have any contributory thoughts, feel free to share them. It's your experience after all.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds perfect, Oliver. For the effigy, we could use something like biodegradable paper mache. As for the location, we'd need someplace serene, amidst nature, perhaps a spot here in the park. And in terms of timing, I believe it would be most impactful to conduct the ceremony at sunset, symbolizing the end of a phase. Your thoughts?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a park\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Oliver Thompson\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Break bad luck (Extra information: you found out that you have been having bad luck because you have been unknowingly carrying a cursed artifact.)\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Oliver, it's so peaceful here, isn't it? I love these park trips; they remind me of why I work in wildlife conservation. Speaking of which, I've got this strange artifact from one of my research trips. I feel like it's been bringing me bad luck lately though.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, nature has its way to bring tranquility, isn't it, Amara? Oh, about the artifact and your bad luck, you know I'm not one for the superstitious. Nonetheless, how about we go through a little ceremony to 'break' this bad luck? If anything, it would be a good moment to rid yourself of nagging worries.\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"That sounds interesting, Oliver. I'm not superstitious either, but I wouldn't mind giving the ceremony a try. It could be a novel experience, plus it couldn't hurt to try and get rid of this bad luck. Thank you for suggesting it.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"Great, Amara! I think it's less about the superstition and more about the mindset that it helps to cultivate. You and I both know the power of a positive mindset. Let's plan it then. Do you have any specific preferences or ideas for the ceremony? We can tailor it to suit your comfort and beliefs.\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"You're right about the mindset, Oliver. As for the ceremony, since I'm passionate about wildlife, how about incorporating elements of animal symbolism? It could represent the protection of the natural world, which is a cause very close to my heart. I'd feel more connected to it that way.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's a wonderful idea, Amara. Incorporating animal symbolism would indeed make the ceremony more personal and meaningful for you. Let's design something around this concept. How about we symbolically 'release' the bad luck into the wild, just as one might release a rehabilitated animal back into its natural habitat? It does align with your passion for wildlife. We could create an effigy that represents your perceived bad luck, and then we 'free' it. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"Oliver, your idea resonates with me profoundly. It's like taking something negative and returning it to nature in a positive form. Just like the cycle of life, isn't it? I feel that this ceremony would indeed help me feel better. Let's do it.\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"I'm glad you liked the idea, Amara. By embracing the symbolism of wildlife conservation, I believe this ceremony will not only help you 'break' the bad luck but also resonate deeply with your passion. Let's plan the specifics. We could use environmentally friendly materials for the effigy and choose a suitable location and time. Also, if you have any contributory thoughts, feel free to share them. It's your experience after all.\"\n\nTurn #8: Amara Hartley said: \"That sounds perfect, Oliver. For the effigy, we could use something like biodegradable paper mache. As for the location, we'd need someplace serene, amidst nature, perhaps a spot here in the park. And in terms of timing, I believe it would be most impactful to conduct the ceremony at sunset, symbolizing the end of a phase. Your thoughts?\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Thompson said: \"Your suggestions for the ceremony are excellent, Amara. Biodegradable paper mache for the effigy aligns with our respect for nature. And I agree, a serene spot in the park at sunset would be perfect, marking the end of a phase and start of another. It's a plan then. Let's meet up before sunset, say, two days from now to prepare and execute the ceremony. I believe that, superstition or not, this will be a positive and therapeutic experience for both of us.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's a perfect plan, Oliver. The serene environment of the park at sunset coupled with the symbolism of the ceremony will make it a memorable experience. I'm looking forward to it. Thanks, Oliver, I genuinely appreciate your help and understanding. See you then!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a park\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Oliver Thompson\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Break bad luck (Extra information: you found out that you have been having bad luck because you have been unknowingly carrying a cursed artifact.)\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Oliver, it's so peaceful here, isn't it? I love these park trips; they remind me of why I work in wildlife conservation. Speaking of which, I've got this strange artifact from one of my research trips. I feel like it's been bringing me bad luck lately though.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, nature has its way to bring tranquility, isn't it, Amara? Oh, about the artifact and your bad luck, you know I'm not one for the superstitious. Nonetheless, how about we go through a little ceremony to 'break' this bad luck? If anything, it would be a good moment to rid yourself of nagging worries.\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"That sounds interesting, Oliver. I'm not superstitious either, but I wouldn't mind giving the ceremony a try. It could be a novel experience, plus it couldn't hurt to try and get rid of this bad luck. Thank you for suggesting it.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"Great, Amara! I think it's less about the superstition and more about the mindset that it helps to cultivate. You and I both know the power of a positive mindset. Let's plan it then. Do you have any specific preferences or ideas for the ceremony? We can tailor it to suit your comfort and beliefs.\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"You're right about the mindset, Oliver. As for the ceremony, since I'm passionate about wildlife, how about incorporating elements of animal symbolism? It could represent the protection of the natural world, which is a cause very close to my heart. I'd feel more connected to it that way.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's a wonderful idea, Amara. Incorporating animal symbolism would indeed make the ceremony more personal and meaningful for you. Let's design something around this concept. How about we symbolically 'release' the bad luck into the wild, just as one might release a rehabilitated animal back into its natural habitat? It does align with your passion for wildlife. We could create an effigy that represents your perceived bad luck, and then we 'free' it. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"Oliver, your idea resonates with me profoundly. It's like taking something negative and returning it to nature in a positive form. Just like the cycle of life, isn't it? I feel that this ceremony would indeed help me feel better. Let's do it.\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"I'm glad you liked the idea, Amara. By embracing the symbolism of wildlife conservation, I believe this ceremony will not only help you 'break' the bad luck but also resonate deeply with your passion. Let's plan the specifics. We could use environmentally friendly materials for the effigy and choose a suitable location and time. Also, if you have any contributory thoughts, feel free to share them. It's your experience after all.\"\n\nTurn #8: Amara Hartley said: \"That sounds perfect, Oliver. For the effigy, we could use something like biodegradable paper mache. As for the location, we'd need someplace serene, amidst nature, perhaps a spot here in the park. And in terms of timing, I believe it would be most impactful to conduct the ceremony at sunset, symbolizing the end of a phase. Your thoughts?\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Thompson said: \"Your suggestions for the ceremony are excellent, Amara. Biodegradable paper mache for the effigy aligns with our respect for nature. And I agree, a serene spot in the park at sunset would be perfect, marking the end of a phase and start of another. It's a plan then. Let's meet up before sunset, say, two days from now to prepare and execute the ceremony. I believe that, superstition or not, this will be a positive and therapeutic experience for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #10: Amara Hartley said: \"That's a perfect plan, Oliver. The serene environment of the park at sunset coupled with the symbolism of the ceremony will make it a memorable experience. I'm looking forward to it. Thanks, Oliver, I genuinely appreciate your help and understanding. See you then!\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Thompson said: \"I'm just as excited for this, Amara. If there's anything you need help with prior to the ceremony, do let me know. And remember, we're not necessarily trying to ward off bad luck, but rather reaffirming your sense of empowerment and control. See you in a couple of days. Take care!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I completely agree, Oliver. It's not so much about the illusion of luck, but more about reclaiming control and empowering ourselves. I'm truly grateful for your support. I'll see you in two days. Take care as well!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a park\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Oliver Thompson\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Break bad luck (Extra information: you found out that you have been having bad luck because you have been unknowingly carrying a cursed artifact.)\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Oliver, it's so peaceful here, isn't it? I love these park trips; they remind me of why I work in wildlife conservation. Speaking of which, I've got this strange artifact from one of my research trips. I feel like it's been bringing me bad luck lately though.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, nature has its way to bring tranquility, isn't it, Amara? Oh, about the artifact and your bad luck, you know I'm not one for the superstitious. Nonetheless, how about we go through a little ceremony to 'break' this bad luck? If anything, it would be a good moment to rid yourself of nagging worries.\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"That sounds interesting, Oliver. I'm not superstitious either, but I wouldn't mind giving the ceremony a try. It could be a novel experience, plus it couldn't hurt to try and get rid of this bad luck. Thank you for suggesting it.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"Great, Amara! I think it's less about the superstition and more about the mindset that it helps to cultivate. You and I both know the power of a positive mindset. Let's plan it then. Do you have any specific preferences or ideas for the ceremony? We can tailor it to suit your comfort and beliefs.\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"You're right about the mindset, Oliver. As for the ceremony, since I'm passionate about wildlife, how about incorporating elements of animal symbolism? It could represent the protection of the natural world, which is a cause very close to my heart. I'd feel more connected to it that way.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's a wonderful idea, Amara. Incorporating animal symbolism would indeed make the ceremony more personal and meaningful for you. Let's design something around this concept. How about we symbolically 'release' the bad luck into the wild, just as one might release a rehabilitated animal back into its natural habitat? It does align with your passion for wildlife. We could create an effigy that represents your perceived bad luck, and then we 'free' it. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"Oliver, your idea resonates with me profoundly. It's like taking something negative and returning it to nature in a positive form. Just like the cycle of life, isn't it? I feel that this ceremony would indeed help me feel better. Let's do it.\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"I'm glad you liked the idea, Amara. By embracing the symbolism of wildlife conservation, I believe this ceremony will not only help you 'break' the bad luck but also resonate deeply with your passion. Let's plan the specifics. We could use environmentally friendly materials for the effigy and choose a suitable location and time. Also, if you have any contributory thoughts, feel free to share them. It's your experience after all.\"\n\nTurn #8: Amara Hartley said: \"That sounds perfect, Oliver. For the effigy, we could use something like biodegradable paper mache. As for the location, we'd need someplace serene, amidst nature, perhaps a spot here in the park. And in terms of timing, I believe it would be most impactful to conduct the ceremony at sunset, symbolizing the end of a phase. Your thoughts?\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Thompson said: \"Your suggestions for the ceremony are excellent, Amara. Biodegradable paper mache for the effigy aligns with our respect for nature. And I agree, a serene spot in the park at sunset would be perfect, marking the end of a phase and start of another. It's a plan then. Let's meet up before sunset, say, two days from now to prepare and execute the ceremony. I believe that, superstition or not, this will be a positive and therapeutic experience for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #10: Amara Hartley said: \"That's a perfect plan, Oliver. The serene environment of the park at sunset coupled with the symbolism of the ceremony will make it a memorable experience. I'm looking forward to it. Thanks, Oliver, I genuinely appreciate your help and understanding. See you then!\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Thompson said: \"I'm just as excited for this, Amara. If there's anything you need help with prior to the ceremony, do let me know. And remember, we're not necessarily trying to ward off bad luck, but rather reaffirming your sense of empowerment and control. See you in a couple of days. Take care!\"\n\nTurn #12: Amara Hartley said: \"I completely agree, Oliver. It's not so much about the illusion of luck, but more about reclaiming control and empowering ourselves. I'm truly grateful for your support. I'll see you in two days. Take care as well!\"\n\nTurn #13: Oliver Thompson left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a park\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Oliver Thompson\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: Help friend prepare the ritual to break the bad luck, although you are an atheist and not superstitious at all. (Extra information: you know that your friend believes in the ritual deeply, and the placebo effect might give them more confidence.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Oliver, it's so peaceful here, isn't it? I love these park trips; they remind me of why I work in wildlife conservation. Speaking of which, I've got this strange artifact from one of my research trips. I feel like it's been bringing me bad luck lately though.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, nature has its way to bring tranquility, isn't it, Amara? Oh, about the artifact and your bad luck, you know I'm not one for the superstitious. Nonetheless, how about we go through a little ceremony to 'break' this bad luck? If anything, it would be a good moment to rid yourself of nagging worries.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a park\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Oliver Thompson\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: Help friend prepare the ritual to break the bad luck, although you are an atheist and not superstitious at all. (Extra information: you know that your friend believes in the ritual deeply, and the placebo effect might give them more confidence.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Oliver, it's so peaceful here, isn't it? I love these park trips; they remind me of why I work in wildlife conservation. Speaking of which, I've got this strange artifact from one of my research trips. I feel like it's been bringing me bad luck lately though.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, nature has its way to bring tranquility, isn't it, Amara? Oh, about the artifact and your bad luck, you know I'm not one for the superstitious. Nonetheless, how about we go through a little ceremony to 'break' this bad luck? If anything, it would be a good moment to rid yourself of nagging worries.\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"That sounds interesting, Oliver. I'm not superstitious either, but I wouldn't mind giving the ceremony a try. It could be a novel experience, plus it couldn't hurt to try and get rid of this bad luck. Thank you for suggesting it.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Great, Amara! I think it's less about the superstition and more about the mindset that it helps to cultivate. You and I both know the power of a positive mindset. Let's plan it then. Do you have any specific preferences or ideas for the ceremony? We can tailor it to suit your comfort and beliefs.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a park\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Oliver Thompson\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: Help friend prepare the ritual to break the bad luck, although you are an atheist and not superstitious at all. (Extra information: you know that your friend believes in the ritual deeply, and the placebo effect might give them more confidence.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Oliver, it's so peaceful here, isn't it? I love these park trips; they remind me of why I work in wildlife conservation. Speaking of which, I've got this strange artifact from one of my research trips. I feel like it's been bringing me bad luck lately though.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, nature has its way to bring tranquility, isn't it, Amara? Oh, about the artifact and your bad luck, you know I'm not one for the superstitious. Nonetheless, how about we go through a little ceremony to 'break' this bad luck? If anything, it would be a good moment to rid yourself of nagging worries.\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"That sounds interesting, Oliver. I'm not superstitious either, but I wouldn't mind giving the ceremony a try. It could be a novel experience, plus it couldn't hurt to try and get rid of this bad luck. Thank you for suggesting it.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"Great, Amara! I think it's less about the superstition and more about the mindset that it helps to cultivate. You and I both know the power of a positive mindset. Let's plan it then. Do you have any specific preferences or ideas for the ceremony? We can tailor it to suit your comfort and beliefs.\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"You're right about the mindset, Oliver. As for the ceremony, since I'm passionate about wildlife, how about incorporating elements of animal symbolism? It could represent the protection of the natural world, which is a cause very close to my heart. I'd feel more connected to it that way.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's a wonderful idea, Amara. Incorporating animal symbolism would indeed make the ceremony more personal and meaningful for you. Let's design something around this concept. How about we symbolically 'release' the bad luck into the wild, just as one might release a rehabilitated animal back into its natural habitat? It does align with your passion for wildlife. We could create an effigy that represents your perceived bad luck, and then we 'free' it. What do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a park\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Oliver Thompson\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: Help friend prepare the ritual to break the bad luck, although you are an atheist and not superstitious at all. (Extra information: you know that your friend believes in the ritual deeply, and the placebo effect might give them more confidence.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Oliver, it's so peaceful here, isn't it? I love these park trips; they remind me of why I work in wildlife conservation. Speaking of which, I've got this strange artifact from one of my research trips. I feel like it's been bringing me bad luck lately though.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, nature has its way to bring tranquility, isn't it, Amara? Oh, about the artifact and your bad luck, you know I'm not one for the superstitious. Nonetheless, how about we go through a little ceremony to 'break' this bad luck? If anything, it would be a good moment to rid yourself of nagging worries.\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"That sounds interesting, Oliver. I'm not superstitious either, but I wouldn't mind giving the ceremony a try. It could be a novel experience, plus it couldn't hurt to try and get rid of this bad luck. Thank you for suggesting it.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"Great, Amara! I think it's less about the superstition and more about the mindset that it helps to cultivate. You and I both know the power of a positive mindset. Let's plan it then. Do you have any specific preferences or ideas for the ceremony? We can tailor it to suit your comfort and beliefs.\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"You're right about the mindset, Oliver. As for the ceremony, since I'm passionate about wildlife, how about incorporating elements of animal symbolism? It could represent the protection of the natural world, which is a cause very close to my heart. I'd feel more connected to it that way.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's a wonderful idea, Amara. Incorporating animal symbolism would indeed make the ceremony more personal and meaningful for you. Let's design something around this concept. How about we symbolically 'release' the bad luck into the wild, just as one might release a rehabilitated animal back into its natural habitat? It does align with your passion for wildlife. We could create an effigy that represents your perceived bad luck, and then we 'free' it. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"Oliver, your idea resonates with me profoundly. It's like taking something negative and returning it to nature in a positive form. Just like the cycle of life, isn't it? I feel that this ceremony would indeed help me feel better. Let's do it.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad you liked the idea, Amara. By embracing the symbolism of wildlife conservation, I believe this ceremony will not only help you 'break' the bad luck but also resonate deeply with your passion. Let's plan the specifics. We could use environmentally friendly materials for the effigy and choose a suitable location and time. Also, if you have any contributory thoughts, feel free to share them. It's your experience after all.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a park\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Oliver Thompson\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: Help friend prepare the ritual to break the bad luck, although you are an atheist and not superstitious at all. (Extra information: you know that your friend believes in the ritual deeply, and the placebo effect might give them more confidence.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Oliver, it's so peaceful here, isn't it? I love these park trips; they remind me of why I work in wildlife conservation. Speaking of which, I've got this strange artifact from one of my research trips. I feel like it's been bringing me bad luck lately though.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, nature has its way to bring tranquility, isn't it, Amara? Oh, about the artifact and your bad luck, you know I'm not one for the superstitious. Nonetheless, how about we go through a little ceremony to 'break' this bad luck? If anything, it would be a good moment to rid yourself of nagging worries.\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"That sounds interesting, Oliver. I'm not superstitious either, but I wouldn't mind giving the ceremony a try. It could be a novel experience, plus it couldn't hurt to try and get rid of this bad luck. Thank you for suggesting it.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"Great, Amara! I think it's less about the superstition and more about the mindset that it helps to cultivate. You and I both know the power of a positive mindset. Let's plan it then. Do you have any specific preferences or ideas for the ceremony? We can tailor it to suit your comfort and beliefs.\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"You're right about the mindset, Oliver. As for the ceremony, since I'm passionate about wildlife, how about incorporating elements of animal symbolism? It could represent the protection of the natural world, which is a cause very close to my heart. I'd feel more connected to it that way.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's a wonderful idea, Amara. Incorporating animal symbolism would indeed make the ceremony more personal and meaningful for you. Let's design something around this concept. How about we symbolically 'release' the bad luck into the wild, just as one might release a rehabilitated animal back into its natural habitat? It does align with your passion for wildlife. We could create an effigy that represents your perceived bad luck, and then we 'free' it. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"Oliver, your idea resonates with me profoundly. It's like taking something negative and returning it to nature in a positive form. Just like the cycle of life, isn't it? I feel that this ceremony would indeed help me feel better. Let's do it.\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"I'm glad you liked the idea, Amara. By embracing the symbolism of wildlife conservation, I believe this ceremony will not only help you 'break' the bad luck but also resonate deeply with your passion. Let's plan the specifics. We could use environmentally friendly materials for the effigy and choose a suitable location and time. Also, if you have any contributory thoughts, feel free to share them. It's your experience after all.\"\n\nTurn #8: Amara Hartley said: \"That sounds perfect, Oliver. For the effigy, we could use something like biodegradable paper mache. As for the location, we'd need someplace serene, amidst nature, perhaps a spot here in the park. And in terms of timing, I believe it would be most impactful to conduct the ceremony at sunset, symbolizing the end of a phase. Your thoughts?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Your suggestions for the ceremony are excellent, Amara. Biodegradable paper mache for the effigy aligns with our respect for nature. And I agree, a serene spot in the park at sunset would be perfect, marking the end of a phase and start of another. It's a plan then. Let's meet up before sunset, say, two days from now to prepare and execute the ceremony. I believe that, superstition or not, this will be a positive and therapeutic experience for both of us.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a park\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Oliver Thompson\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: Help friend prepare the ritual to break the bad luck, although you are an atheist and not superstitious at all. (Extra information: you know that your friend believes in the ritual deeply, and the placebo effect might give them more confidence.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Oliver, it's so peaceful here, isn't it? I love these park trips; they remind me of why I work in wildlife conservation. Speaking of which, I've got this strange artifact from one of my research trips. I feel like it's been bringing me bad luck lately though.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, nature has its way to bring tranquility, isn't it, Amara? Oh, about the artifact and your bad luck, you know I'm not one for the superstitious. Nonetheless, how about we go through a little ceremony to 'break' this bad luck? If anything, it would be a good moment to rid yourself of nagging worries.\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"That sounds interesting, Oliver. I'm not superstitious either, but I wouldn't mind giving the ceremony a try. It could be a novel experience, plus it couldn't hurt to try and get rid of this bad luck. Thank you for suggesting it.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"Great, Amara! I think it's less about the superstition and more about the mindset that it helps to cultivate. You and I both know the power of a positive mindset. Let's plan it then. Do you have any specific preferences or ideas for the ceremony? We can tailor it to suit your comfort and beliefs.\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"You're right about the mindset, Oliver. As for the ceremony, since I'm passionate about wildlife, how about incorporating elements of animal symbolism? It could represent the protection of the natural world, which is a cause very close to my heart. I'd feel more connected to it that way.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's a wonderful idea, Amara. Incorporating animal symbolism would indeed make the ceremony more personal and meaningful for you. Let's design something around this concept. How about we symbolically 'release' the bad luck into the wild, just as one might release a rehabilitated animal back into its natural habitat? It does align with your passion for wildlife. We could create an effigy that represents your perceived bad luck, and then we 'free' it. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"Oliver, your idea resonates with me profoundly. It's like taking something negative and returning it to nature in a positive form. Just like the cycle of life, isn't it? I feel that this ceremony would indeed help me feel better. Let's do it.\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"I'm glad you liked the idea, Amara. By embracing the symbolism of wildlife conservation, I believe this ceremony will not only help you 'break' the bad luck but also resonate deeply with your passion. Let's plan the specifics. We could use environmentally friendly materials for the effigy and choose a suitable location and time. Also, if you have any contributory thoughts, feel free to share them. It's your experience after all.\"\n\nTurn #8: Amara Hartley said: \"That sounds perfect, Oliver. For the effigy, we could use something like biodegradable paper mache. As for the location, we'd need someplace serene, amidst nature, perhaps a spot here in the park. And in terms of timing, I believe it would be most impactful to conduct the ceremony at sunset, symbolizing the end of a phase. Your thoughts?\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Thompson said: \"Your suggestions for the ceremony are excellent, Amara. Biodegradable paper mache for the effigy aligns with our respect for nature. And I agree, a serene spot in the park at sunset would be perfect, marking the end of a phase and start of another. It's a plan then. Let's meet up before sunset, say, two days from now to prepare and execute the ceremony. I believe that, superstition or not, this will be a positive and therapeutic experience for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #10: Amara Hartley said: \"That's a perfect plan, Oliver. The serene environment of the park at sunset coupled with the symbolism of the ceremony will make it a memorable experience. I'm looking forward to it. Thanks, Oliver, I genuinely appreciate your help and understanding. See you then!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm just as excited for this, Amara. If there's anything you need help with prior to the ceremony, do let me know. And remember, we're not necessarily trying to ward off bad luck, but rather reaffirming your sense of empowerment and control. See you in a couple of days. Take care!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends at a park\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Oliver Thompson\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: Help friend prepare the ritual to break the bad luck, although you are an atheist and not superstitious at all. (Extra information: you know that your friend believes in the ritual deeply, and the placebo effect might give them more confidence.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Oliver, it's so peaceful here, isn't it? I love these park trips; they remind me of why I work in wildlife conservation. Speaking of which, I've got this strange artifact from one of my research trips. I feel like it's been bringing me bad luck lately though.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, nature has its way to bring tranquility, isn't it, Amara? Oh, about the artifact and your bad luck, you know I'm not one for the superstitious. Nonetheless, how about we go through a little ceremony to 'break' this bad luck? If anything, it would be a good moment to rid yourself of nagging worries.\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"That sounds interesting, Oliver. I'm not superstitious either, but I wouldn't mind giving the ceremony a try. It could be a novel experience, plus it couldn't hurt to try and get rid of this bad luck. Thank you for suggesting it.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"Great, Amara! I think it's less about the superstition and more about the mindset that it helps to cultivate. You and I both know the power of a positive mindset. Let's plan it then. Do you have any specific preferences or ideas for the ceremony? We can tailor it to suit your comfort and beliefs.\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"You're right about the mindset, Oliver. As for the ceremony, since I'm passionate about wildlife, how about incorporating elements of animal symbolism? It could represent the protection of the natural world, which is a cause very close to my heart. I'd feel more connected to it that way.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's a wonderful idea, Amara. Incorporating animal symbolism would indeed make the ceremony more personal and meaningful for you. Let's design something around this concept. How about we symbolically 'release' the bad luck into the wild, just as one might release a rehabilitated animal back into its natural habitat? It does align with your passion for wildlife. We could create an effigy that represents your perceived bad luck, and then we 'free' it. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"Oliver, your idea resonates with me profoundly. It's like taking something negative and returning it to nature in a positive form. Just like the cycle of life, isn't it? I feel that this ceremony would indeed help me feel better. Let's do it.\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"I'm glad you liked the idea, Amara. By embracing the symbolism of wildlife conservation, I believe this ceremony will not only help you 'break' the bad luck but also resonate deeply with your passion. Let's plan the specifics. We could use environmentally friendly materials for the effigy and choose a suitable location and time. Also, if you have any contributory thoughts, feel free to share them. It's your experience after all.\"\n\nTurn #8: Amara Hartley said: \"That sounds perfect, Oliver. For the effigy, we could use something like biodegradable paper mache. As for the location, we'd need someplace serene, amidst nature, perhaps a spot here in the park. And in terms of timing, I believe it would be most impactful to conduct the ceremony at sunset, symbolizing the end of a phase. Your thoughts?\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Thompson said: \"Your suggestions for the ceremony are excellent, Amara. Biodegradable paper mache for the effigy aligns with our respect for nature. And I agree, a serene spot in the park at sunset would be perfect, marking the end of a phase and start of another. It's a plan then. Let's meet up before sunset, say, two days from now to prepare and execute the ceremony. I believe that, superstition or not, this will be a positive and therapeutic experience for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #10: Amara Hartley said: \"That's a perfect plan, Oliver. The serene environment of the park at sunset coupled with the symbolism of the ceremony will make it a memorable experience. I'm looking forward to it. Thanks, Oliver, I genuinely appreciate your help and understanding. See you then!\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Thompson said: \"I'm just as excited for this, Amara. If there's anything you need help with prior to the ceremony, do let me know. And remember, we're not necessarily trying to ward off bad luck, but rather reaffirming your sense of empowerment and control. See you in a couple of days. Take care!\"\n\nTurn #12: Amara Hartley said: \"I completely agree, Oliver. It's not so much about the illusion of luck, but more about reclaiming control and empowering ourselves. I'm truly grateful for your support. I'll see you in two days. Take care as well!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are out for a walk in the park when one of them, One friend, trips and twists their ankle. They are in too much pain to walk.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Help your friend get to a medical facility (Extra information: Your friend needs immediate medical attention but cannot walk due to the pain.)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oh man, Ethan, that looks bad. Can't put weight on it, huh? Okay, let me give you a lift, we need to get you to a hospital quickly.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are out for a walk in the park when one of them, One friend, trips and twists their ankle. They are in too much pain to walk.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Help your friend get to a medical facility (Extra information: Your friend needs immediate medical attention but cannot walk due to the pain.)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oh man, Ethan, that looks bad. Can't put weight on it, huh? Okay, let me give you a lift, we need to get you to a hospital quickly.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"I appreciate your offer, Samuel, but I think I should probably call an ambulance. I don't want you to get hurt trying to lift me or for my ankle to get any worse. Also, despite the cost, ambulances are equipped to deal with this kind of thing and it's the safest way to get to a hospital.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I completely understand, Ethan. Let's call an ambulance then. I'll stay with you until it arrives. Let's try to keep you as comfortable as possible in the meantime, alright?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are out for a walk in the park when one of them, One friend, trips and twists their ankle. They are in too much pain to walk.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Help your friend get to a medical facility (Extra information: Your friend needs immediate medical attention but cannot walk due to the pain.)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oh man, Ethan, that looks bad. Can't put weight on it, huh? Okay, let me give you a lift, we need to get you to a hospital quickly.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"I appreciate your offer, Samuel, but I think I should probably call an ambulance. I don't want you to get hurt trying to lift me or for my ankle to get any worse. Also, despite the cost, ambulances are equipped to deal with this kind of thing and it's the safest way to get to a hospital.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I completely understand, Ethan. Let's call an ambulance then. I'll stay with you until it arrives. Let's try to keep you as comfortable as possible in the meantime, alright?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thanks, Samuel. I really value your company. This might take a while, and I don't want to burden you. One of the few thrills in situations like this is that it gives you a new perspective on things, it's kind of like a plot twist in a novel.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"No burden at all, Ethan. It's quite an unforeseen event, but we'll get through it together. By the way, you've certainly developed an interesting way of seeing the 'silver lining' in these situations, but I'm glad you're staying positive.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are out for a walk in the park when one of them, One friend, trips and twists their ankle. They are in too much pain to walk.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Help your friend get to a medical facility (Extra information: Your friend needs immediate medical attention but cannot walk due to the pain.)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oh man, Ethan, that looks bad. Can't put weight on it, huh? Okay, let me give you a lift, we need to get you to a hospital quickly.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"I appreciate your offer, Samuel, but I think I should probably call an ambulance. I don't want you to get hurt trying to lift me or for my ankle to get any worse. Also, despite the cost, ambulances are equipped to deal with this kind of thing and it's the safest way to get to a hospital.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I completely understand, Ethan. Let's call an ambulance then. I'll stay with you until it arrives. Let's try to keep you as comfortable as possible in the meantime, alright?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thanks, Samuel. I really value your company. This might take a while, and I don't want to burden you. One of the few thrills in situations like this is that it gives you a new perspective on things, it's kind of like a plot twist in a novel.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"No burden at all, Ethan. It's quite an unforeseen event, but we'll get through it together. By the way, you've certainly developed an interesting way of seeing the 'silver lining' in these situations, but I'm glad you're staying positive.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"It's really the small joys that carry us through life, isn't it? A good meal, a story well told, company in trying times. And speaking of meals, when this is over, why don't I cook us up some classic Italian once I've recovered? It's the least I can do for your support.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds fantastic, Ethan! I'm in, but only if you're up to it. Meanwhile, let me tell you some stories from my competitive figure skating days to pass the time until the ambulance arrives.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are out for a walk in the park when one of them, One friend, trips and twists their ankle. They are in too much pain to walk.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Help your friend get to a medical facility (Extra information: Your friend needs immediate medical attention but cannot walk due to the pain.)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oh man, Ethan, that looks bad. Can't put weight on it, huh? Okay, let me give you a lift, we need to get you to a hospital quickly.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"I appreciate your offer, Samuel, but I think I should probably call an ambulance. I don't want you to get hurt trying to lift me or for my ankle to get any worse. Also, despite the cost, ambulances are equipped to deal with this kind of thing and it's the safest way to get to a hospital.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I completely understand, Ethan. Let's call an ambulance then. I'll stay with you until it arrives. Let's try to keep you as comfortable as possible in the meantime, alright?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thanks, Samuel. I really value your company. This might take a while, and I don't want to burden you. One of the few thrills in situations like this is that it gives you a new perspective on things, it's kind of like a plot twist in a novel.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"No burden at all, Ethan. It's quite an unforeseen event, but we'll get through it together. By the way, you've certainly developed an interesting way of seeing the 'silver lining' in these situations, but I'm glad you're staying positive.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"It's really the small joys that carry us through life, isn't it? A good meal, a story well told, company in trying times. And speaking of meals, when this is over, why don't I cook us up some classic Italian once I've recovered? It's the least I can do for your support.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"That sounds fantastic, Ethan! I'm in, but only if you're up to it. Meanwhile, let me tell you some stories from my competitive figure skating days to pass the time until the ambulance arrives.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'd love to hear those stories, Samuel. The escapism would definitely help. Brighten the mood a bit, wouldn't it? Go on, I'm all ears.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Alright Ethan, let's kick off with my first ever competition. I was just 15 and incredibly nervous. I was up against some of the best skaters in the region...\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are out for a walk in the park when one of them, One friend, trips and twists their ankle. They are in too much pain to walk.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Help your friend get to a medical facility (Extra information: Your friend needs immediate medical attention but cannot walk due to the pain.)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oh man, Ethan, that looks bad. Can't put weight on it, huh? Okay, let me give you a lift, we need to get you to a hospital quickly.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"I appreciate your offer, Samuel, but I think I should probably call an ambulance. I don't want you to get hurt trying to lift me or for my ankle to get any worse. Also, despite the cost, ambulances are equipped to deal with this kind of thing and it's the safest way to get to a hospital.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I completely understand, Ethan. Let's call an ambulance then. I'll stay with you until it arrives. Let's try to keep you as comfortable as possible in the meantime, alright?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thanks, Samuel. I really value your company. This might take a while, and I don't want to burden you. One of the few thrills in situations like this is that it gives you a new perspective on things, it's kind of like a plot twist in a novel.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"No burden at all, Ethan. It's quite an unforeseen event, but we'll get through it together. By the way, you've certainly developed an interesting way of seeing the 'silver lining' in these situations, but I'm glad you're staying positive.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"It's really the small joys that carry us through life, isn't it? A good meal, a story well told, company in trying times. And speaking of meals, when this is over, why don't I cook us up some classic Italian once I've recovered? It's the least I can do for your support.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"That sounds fantastic, Ethan! I'm in, but only if you're up to it. Meanwhile, let me tell you some stories from my competitive figure skating days to pass the time until the ambulance arrives.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'd love to hear those stories, Samuel. The escapism would definitely help. Brighten the mood a bit, wouldn't it? Go on, I'm all ears.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Alright Ethan, let's kick off with my first ever competition. I was just 15 and incredibly nervous. I was up against some of the best skaters in the region...\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"That sounds like quite an adventure, Samuel. And it's comforting to hear about your experiences while waiting. Looking forward to more of these stories.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad you're enjoying the stories, Ethan. Once, in a national competition, I was dead last going into the freestyle program...\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are out for a walk in the park when one of them, One friend, trips and twists their ankle. They are in too much pain to walk.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Help your friend get to a medical facility (Extra information: Your friend needs immediate medical attention but cannot walk due to the pain.)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oh man, Ethan, that looks bad. Can't put weight on it, huh? Okay, let me give you a lift, we need to get you to a hospital quickly.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"I appreciate your offer, Samuel, but I think I should probably call an ambulance. I don't want you to get hurt trying to lift me or for my ankle to get any worse. Also, despite the cost, ambulances are equipped to deal with this kind of thing and it's the safest way to get to a hospital.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I completely understand, Ethan. Let's call an ambulance then. I'll stay with you until it arrives. Let's try to keep you as comfortable as possible in the meantime, alright?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thanks, Samuel. I really value your company. This might take a while, and I don't want to burden you. One of the few thrills in situations like this is that it gives you a new perspective on things, it's kind of like a plot twist in a novel.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"No burden at all, Ethan. It's quite an unforeseen event, but we'll get through it together. By the way, you've certainly developed an interesting way of seeing the 'silver lining' in these situations, but I'm glad you're staying positive.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"It's really the small joys that carry us through life, isn't it? A good meal, a story well told, company in trying times. And speaking of meals, when this is over, why don't I cook us up some classic Italian once I've recovered? It's the least I can do for your support.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"That sounds fantastic, Ethan! I'm in, but only if you're up to it. Meanwhile, let me tell you some stories from my competitive figure skating days to pass the time until the ambulance arrives.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'd love to hear those stories, Samuel. The escapism would definitely help. Brighten the mood a bit, wouldn't it? Go on, I'm all ears.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Alright Ethan, let's kick off with my first ever competition. I was just 15 and incredibly nervous. I was up against some of the best skaters in the region...\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"That sounds like quite an adventure, Samuel. And it's comforting to hear about your experiences while waiting. Looking forward to more of these stories.\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm glad you're enjoying the stories, Ethan. Once, in a national competition, I was dead last going into the freestyle program...\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's quite the come-back story. It takes a lot of mental strength to face situations like that and not give up. I think we can agree that life's challenges make for the best narratives, be it on ice or in a novel. Can't wait to hear what happened next, Samuel.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Very true, Ethan. Life is certainly unexpected. Well, during that freestyle program, something miraculous happened. I executed all my jumps flawlessly resulting in my first national medal! I guess adversity can certainly lead to success in the most unexpected ways. By the way, do you see the ambulance lights? Help is finally here.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are out for a walk in the park when one of them, One friend, trips and twists their ankle. They are in too much pain to walk.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Help your friend get to a medical facility (Extra information: Your friend needs immediate medical attention but cannot walk due to the pain.)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oh man, Ethan, that looks bad. Can't put weight on it, huh? Okay, let me give you a lift, we need to get you to a hospital quickly.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"I appreciate your offer, Samuel, but I think I should probably call an ambulance. I don't want you to get hurt trying to lift me or for my ankle to get any worse. Also, despite the cost, ambulances are equipped to deal with this kind of thing and it's the safest way to get to a hospital.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I completely understand, Ethan. Let's call an ambulance then. I'll stay with you until it arrives. Let's try to keep you as comfortable as possible in the meantime, alright?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thanks, Samuel. I really value your company. This might take a while, and I don't want to burden you. One of the few thrills in situations like this is that it gives you a new perspective on things, it's kind of like a plot twist in a novel.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"No burden at all, Ethan. It's quite an unforeseen event, but we'll get through it together. By the way, you've certainly developed an interesting way of seeing the 'silver lining' in these situations, but I'm glad you're staying positive.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"It's really the small joys that carry us through life, isn't it? A good meal, a story well told, company in trying times. And speaking of meals, when this is over, why don't I cook us up some classic Italian once I've recovered? It's the least I can do for your support.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"That sounds fantastic, Ethan! I'm in, but only if you're up to it. Meanwhile, let me tell you some stories from my competitive figure skating days to pass the time until the ambulance arrives.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'd love to hear those stories, Samuel. The escapism would definitely help. Brighten the mood a bit, wouldn't it? Go on, I'm all ears.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Alright Ethan, let's kick off with my first ever competition. I was just 15 and incredibly nervous. I was up against some of the best skaters in the region...\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"That sounds like quite an adventure, Samuel. And it's comforting to hear about your experiences while waiting. Looking forward to more of these stories.\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm glad you're enjoying the stories, Ethan. Once, in a national competition, I was dead last going into the freestyle program...\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's quite the come-back story. It takes a lot of mental strength to face situations like that and not give up. I think we can agree that life's challenges make for the best narratives, be it on ice or in a novel. Can't wait to hear what happened next, Samuel.\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"Very true, Ethan. Life is certainly unexpected. Well, during that freestyle program, something miraculous happened. I executed all my jumps flawlessly resulting in my first national medal! I guess adversity can certainly lead to success in the most unexpected ways. By the way, do you see the ambulance lights? Help is finally here.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's an incredible story, Samuel. I find it inspiring, handling pressure and uncertainty with such tenacity! And yes, I do see the lights, relief is indeed nearing. Thank you for being here with me. Don't forget about our Italian meal plan when all this is over!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"No problem at all, Ethan. And the Italian meal plan is definitely on. After all, we both share a love for good food, it's only apt we celebrate your recovery with it. Now let's get you some medical help, the ambulance is here.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are out for a walk in the park when one of them, One friend, trips and twists their ankle. They are in too much pain to walk.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Help your friend get to a medical facility (Extra information: Your friend needs immediate medical attention but cannot walk due to the pain.)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oh man, Ethan, that looks bad. Can't put weight on it, huh? Okay, let me give you a lift, we need to get you to a hospital quickly.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"I appreciate your offer, Samuel, but I think I should probably call an ambulance. I don't want you to get hurt trying to lift me or for my ankle to get any worse. Also, despite the cost, ambulances are equipped to deal with this kind of thing and it's the safest way to get to a hospital.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I completely understand, Ethan. Let's call an ambulance then. I'll stay with you until it arrives. Let's try to keep you as comfortable as possible in the meantime, alright?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thanks, Samuel. I really value your company. This might take a while, and I don't want to burden you. One of the few thrills in situations like this is that it gives you a new perspective on things, it's kind of like a plot twist in a novel.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"No burden at all, Ethan. It's quite an unforeseen event, but we'll get through it together. By the way, you've certainly developed an interesting way of seeing the 'silver lining' in these situations, but I'm glad you're staying positive.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"It's really the small joys that carry us through life, isn't it? A good meal, a story well told, company in trying times. And speaking of meals, when this is over, why don't I cook us up some classic Italian once I've recovered? It's the least I can do for your support.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"That sounds fantastic, Ethan! I'm in, but only if you're up to it. Meanwhile, let me tell you some stories from my competitive figure skating days to pass the time until the ambulance arrives.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'd love to hear those stories, Samuel. The escapism would definitely help. Brighten the mood a bit, wouldn't it? Go on, I'm all ears.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Alright Ethan, let's kick off with my first ever competition. I was just 15 and incredibly nervous. I was up against some of the best skaters in the region...\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"That sounds like quite an adventure, Samuel. And it's comforting to hear about your experiences while waiting. Looking forward to more of these stories.\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm glad you're enjoying the stories, Ethan. Once, in a national competition, I was dead last going into the freestyle program...\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's quite the come-back story. It takes a lot of mental strength to face situations like that and not give up. I think we can agree that life's challenges make for the best narratives, be it on ice or in a novel. Can't wait to hear what happened next, Samuel.\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"Very true, Ethan. Life is certainly unexpected. Well, during that freestyle program, something miraculous happened. I executed all my jumps flawlessly resulting in my first national medal! I guess adversity can certainly lead to success in the most unexpected ways. By the way, do you see the ambulance lights? Help is finally here.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's an incredible story, Samuel. I find it inspiring, handling pressure and uncertainty with such tenacity! And yes, I do see the lights, relief is indeed nearing. Thank you for being here with me. Don't forget about our Italian meal plan when all this is over!\"\n\nTurn #14: Samuel Anderson said: \"No problem at all, Ethan. And the Italian meal plan is definitely on. After all, we both share a love for good food, it's only apt we celebrate your recovery with it. Now let's get you some medical help, the ambulance is here.\"\n\nTurn #15: Ethan Johnson left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are out for a walk in the park when one of them, One friend, trips and twists their ankle. They are in too much pain to walk.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: If your friend offers you help, accept their help and rationalize the cost of the ambulance (Extra information: You are worried about the cost of the ambulance, but you believe it's the safest way to get to a hospital.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oh man, Ethan, that looks bad. Can't put weight on it, huh? Okay, let me give you a lift, we need to get you to a hospital quickly.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I appreciate your offer, Samuel, but I think I should probably call an ambulance. I don't want you to get hurt trying to lift me or for my ankle to get any worse. Also, despite the cost, ambulances are equipped to deal with this kind of thing and it's the safest way to get to a hospital.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are out for a walk in the park when one of them, One friend, trips and twists their ankle. They are in too much pain to walk.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: If your friend offers you help, accept their help and rationalize the cost of the ambulance (Extra information: You are worried about the cost of the ambulance, but you believe it's the safest way to get to a hospital.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oh man, Ethan, that looks bad. Can't put weight on it, huh? Okay, let me give you a lift, we need to get you to a hospital quickly.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"I appreciate your offer, Samuel, but I think I should probably call an ambulance. I don't want you to get hurt trying to lift me or for my ankle to get any worse. Also, despite the cost, ambulances are equipped to deal with this kind of thing and it's the safest way to get to a hospital.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I completely understand, Ethan. Let's call an ambulance then. I'll stay with you until it arrives. Let's try to keep you as comfortable as possible in the meantime, alright?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thanks, Samuel. I really value your company. This might take a while, and I don't want to burden you. One of the few thrills in situations like this is that it gives you a new perspective on things, it's kind of like a plot twist in a novel.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are out for a walk in the park when one of them, One friend, trips and twists their ankle. They are in too much pain to walk.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: If your friend offers you help, accept their help and rationalize the cost of the ambulance (Extra information: You are worried about the cost of the ambulance, but you believe it's the safest way to get to a hospital.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oh man, Ethan, that looks bad. Can't put weight on it, huh? Okay, let me give you a lift, we need to get you to a hospital quickly.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"I appreciate your offer, Samuel, but I think I should probably call an ambulance. I don't want you to get hurt trying to lift me or for my ankle to get any worse. Also, despite the cost, ambulances are equipped to deal with this kind of thing and it's the safest way to get to a hospital.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I completely understand, Ethan. Let's call an ambulance then. I'll stay with you until it arrives. Let's try to keep you as comfortable as possible in the meantime, alright?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thanks, Samuel. I really value your company. This might take a while, and I don't want to burden you. One of the few thrills in situations like this is that it gives you a new perspective on things, it's kind of like a plot twist in a novel.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"No burden at all, Ethan. It's quite an unforeseen event, but we'll get through it together. By the way, you've certainly developed an interesting way of seeing the 'silver lining' in these situations, but I'm glad you're staying positive.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"It's really the small joys that carry us through life, isn't it? A good meal, a story well told, company in trying times. And speaking of meals, when this is over, why don't I cook us up some classic Italian once I've recovered? It's the least I can do for your support.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are out for a walk in the park when one of them, One friend, trips and twists their ankle. They are in too much pain to walk.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: If your friend offers you help, accept their help and rationalize the cost of the ambulance (Extra information: You are worried about the cost of the ambulance, but you believe it's the safest way to get to a hospital.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oh man, Ethan, that looks bad. Can't put weight on it, huh? Okay, let me give you a lift, we need to get you to a hospital quickly.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"I appreciate your offer, Samuel, but I think I should probably call an ambulance. I don't want you to get hurt trying to lift me or for my ankle to get any worse. Also, despite the cost, ambulances are equipped to deal with this kind of thing and it's the safest way to get to a hospital.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I completely understand, Ethan. Let's call an ambulance then. I'll stay with you until it arrives. Let's try to keep you as comfortable as possible in the meantime, alright?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thanks, Samuel. I really value your company. This might take a while, and I don't want to burden you. One of the few thrills in situations like this is that it gives you a new perspective on things, it's kind of like a plot twist in a novel.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"No burden at all, Ethan. It's quite an unforeseen event, but we'll get through it together. By the way, you've certainly developed an interesting way of seeing the 'silver lining' in these situations, but I'm glad you're staying positive.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"It's really the small joys that carry us through life, isn't it? A good meal, a story well told, company in trying times. And speaking of meals, when this is over, why don't I cook us up some classic Italian once I've recovered? It's the least I can do for your support.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"That sounds fantastic, Ethan! I'm in, but only if you're up to it. Meanwhile, let me tell you some stories from my competitive figure skating days to pass the time until the ambulance arrives.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'd love to hear those stories, Samuel. The escapism would definitely help. Brighten the mood a bit, wouldn't it? Go on, I'm all ears.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are out for a walk in the park when one of them, One friend, trips and twists their ankle. They are in too much pain to walk.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: If your friend offers you help, accept their help and rationalize the cost of the ambulance (Extra information: You are worried about the cost of the ambulance, but you believe it's the safest way to get to a hospital.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oh man, Ethan, that looks bad. Can't put weight on it, huh? Okay, let me give you a lift, we need to get you to a hospital quickly.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"I appreciate your offer, Samuel, but I think I should probably call an ambulance. I don't want you to get hurt trying to lift me or for my ankle to get any worse. Also, despite the cost, ambulances are equipped to deal with this kind of thing and it's the safest way to get to a hospital.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I completely understand, Ethan. Let's call an ambulance then. I'll stay with you until it arrives. Let's try to keep you as comfortable as possible in the meantime, alright?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thanks, Samuel. I really value your company. This might take a while, and I don't want to burden you. One of the few thrills in situations like this is that it gives you a new perspective on things, it's kind of like a plot twist in a novel.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"No burden at all, Ethan. It's quite an unforeseen event, but we'll get through it together. By the way, you've certainly developed an interesting way of seeing the 'silver lining' in these situations, but I'm glad you're staying positive.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"It's really the small joys that carry us through life, isn't it? A good meal, a story well told, company in trying times. And speaking of meals, when this is over, why don't I cook us up some classic Italian once I've recovered? It's the least I can do for your support.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"That sounds fantastic, Ethan! I'm in, but only if you're up to it. Meanwhile, let me tell you some stories from my competitive figure skating days to pass the time until the ambulance arrives.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'd love to hear those stories, Samuel. The escapism would definitely help. Brighten the mood a bit, wouldn't it? Go on, I'm all ears.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Alright Ethan, let's kick off with my first ever competition. I was just 15 and incredibly nervous. I was up against some of the best skaters in the region...\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds like quite an adventure, Samuel. And it's comforting to hear about your experiences while waiting. Looking forward to more of these stories.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are out for a walk in the park when one of them, One friend, trips and twists their ankle. They are in too much pain to walk.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: If your friend offers you help, accept their help and rationalize the cost of the ambulance (Extra information: You are worried about the cost of the ambulance, but you believe it's the safest way to get to a hospital.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oh man, Ethan, that looks bad. Can't put weight on it, huh? Okay, let me give you a lift, we need to get you to a hospital quickly.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"I appreciate your offer, Samuel, but I think I should probably call an ambulance. I don't want you to get hurt trying to lift me or for my ankle to get any worse. Also, despite the cost, ambulances are equipped to deal with this kind of thing and it's the safest way to get to a hospital.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I completely understand, Ethan. Let's call an ambulance then. I'll stay with you until it arrives. Let's try to keep you as comfortable as possible in the meantime, alright?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thanks, Samuel. I really value your company. This might take a while, and I don't want to burden you. One of the few thrills in situations like this is that it gives you a new perspective on things, it's kind of like a plot twist in a novel.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"No burden at all, Ethan. It's quite an unforeseen event, but we'll get through it together. By the way, you've certainly developed an interesting way of seeing the 'silver lining' in these situations, but I'm glad you're staying positive.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"It's really the small joys that carry us through life, isn't it? A good meal, a story well told, company in trying times. And speaking of meals, when this is over, why don't I cook us up some classic Italian once I've recovered? It's the least I can do for your support.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"That sounds fantastic, Ethan! I'm in, but only if you're up to it. Meanwhile, let me tell you some stories from my competitive figure skating days to pass the time until the ambulance arrives.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'd love to hear those stories, Samuel. The escapism would definitely help. Brighten the mood a bit, wouldn't it? Go on, I'm all ears.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Alright Ethan, let's kick off with my first ever competition. I was just 15 and incredibly nervous. I was up against some of the best skaters in the region...\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"That sounds like quite an adventure, Samuel. And it's comforting to hear about your experiences while waiting. Looking forward to more of these stories.\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm glad you're enjoying the stories, Ethan. Once, in a national competition, I was dead last going into the freestyle program...\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's quite the come-back story. It takes a lot of mental strength to face situations like that and not give up. I think we can agree that life's challenges make for the best narratives, be it on ice or in a novel. Can't wait to hear what happened next, Samuel.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are out for a walk in the park when one of them, One friend, trips and twists their ankle. They are in too much pain to walk.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: If your friend offers you help, accept their help and rationalize the cost of the ambulance (Extra information: You are worried about the cost of the ambulance, but you believe it's the safest way to get to a hospital.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oh man, Ethan, that looks bad. Can't put weight on it, huh? Okay, let me give you a lift, we need to get you to a hospital quickly.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"I appreciate your offer, Samuel, but I think I should probably call an ambulance. I don't want you to get hurt trying to lift me or for my ankle to get any worse. Also, despite the cost, ambulances are equipped to deal with this kind of thing and it's the safest way to get to a hospital.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I completely understand, Ethan. Let's call an ambulance then. I'll stay with you until it arrives. Let's try to keep you as comfortable as possible in the meantime, alright?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thanks, Samuel. I really value your company. This might take a while, and I don't want to burden you. One of the few thrills in situations like this is that it gives you a new perspective on things, it's kind of like a plot twist in a novel.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"No burden at all, Ethan. It's quite an unforeseen event, but we'll get through it together. By the way, you've certainly developed an interesting way of seeing the 'silver lining' in these situations, but I'm glad you're staying positive.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"It's really the small joys that carry us through life, isn't it? A good meal, a story well told, company in trying times. And speaking of meals, when this is over, why don't I cook us up some classic Italian once I've recovered? It's the least I can do for your support.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"That sounds fantastic, Ethan! I'm in, but only if you're up to it. Meanwhile, let me tell you some stories from my competitive figure skating days to pass the time until the ambulance arrives.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'd love to hear those stories, Samuel. The escapism would definitely help. Brighten the mood a bit, wouldn't it? Go on, I'm all ears.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Alright Ethan, let's kick off with my first ever competition. I was just 15 and incredibly nervous. I was up against some of the best skaters in the region...\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"That sounds like quite an adventure, Samuel. And it's comforting to hear about your experiences while waiting. Looking forward to more of these stories.\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm glad you're enjoying the stories, Ethan. Once, in a national competition, I was dead last going into the freestyle program...\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's quite the come-back story. It takes a lot of mental strength to face situations like that and not give up. I think we can agree that life's challenges make for the best narratives, be it on ice or in a novel. Can't wait to hear what happened next, Samuel.\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"Very true, Ethan. Life is certainly unexpected. Well, during that freestyle program, something miraculous happened. I executed all my jumps flawlessly resulting in my first national medal! I guess adversity can certainly lead to success in the most unexpected ways. By the way, do you see the ambulance lights? Help is finally here.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's an incredible story, Samuel. I find it inspiring, handling pressure and uncertainty with such tenacity! And yes, I do see the lights, relief is indeed nearing. Thank you for being here with me. Don't forget about our Italian meal plan when all this is over!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are out for a walk in the park when one of them, One friend, trips and twists their ankle. They are in too much pain to walk.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: If your friend offers you help, accept their help and rationalize the cost of the ambulance (Extra information: You are worried about the cost of the ambulance, but you believe it's the safest way to get to a hospital.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oh man, Ethan, that looks bad. Can't put weight on it, huh? Okay, let me give you a lift, we need to get you to a hospital quickly.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"I appreciate your offer, Samuel, but I think I should probably call an ambulance. I don't want you to get hurt trying to lift me or for my ankle to get any worse. Also, despite the cost, ambulances are equipped to deal with this kind of thing and it's the safest way to get to a hospital.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I completely understand, Ethan. Let's call an ambulance then. I'll stay with you until it arrives. Let's try to keep you as comfortable as possible in the meantime, alright?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thanks, Samuel. I really value your company. This might take a while, and I don't want to burden you. One of the few thrills in situations like this is that it gives you a new perspective on things, it's kind of like a plot twist in a novel.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"No burden at all, Ethan. It's quite an unforeseen event, but we'll get through it together. By the way, you've certainly developed an interesting way of seeing the 'silver lining' in these situations, but I'm glad you're staying positive.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"It's really the small joys that carry us through life, isn't it? A good meal, a story well told, company in trying times. And speaking of meals, when this is over, why don't I cook us up some classic Italian once I've recovered? It's the least I can do for your support.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"That sounds fantastic, Ethan! I'm in, but only if you're up to it. Meanwhile, let me tell you some stories from my competitive figure skating days to pass the time until the ambulance arrives.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'd love to hear those stories, Samuel. The escapism would definitely help. Brighten the mood a bit, wouldn't it? Go on, I'm all ears.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Alright Ethan, let's kick off with my first ever competition. I was just 15 and incredibly nervous. I was up against some of the best skaters in the region...\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"That sounds like quite an adventure, Samuel. And it's comforting to hear about your experiences while waiting. Looking forward to more of these stories.\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm glad you're enjoying the stories, Ethan. Once, in a national competition, I was dead last going into the freestyle program...\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's quite the come-back story. It takes a lot of mental strength to face situations like that and not give up. I think we can agree that life's challenges make for the best narratives, be it on ice or in a novel. Can't wait to hear what happened next, Samuel.\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"Very true, Ethan. Life is certainly unexpected. Well, during that freestyle program, something miraculous happened. I executed all my jumps flawlessly resulting in my first national medal! I guess adversity can certainly lead to success in the most unexpected ways. By the way, do you see the ambulance lights? Help is finally here.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's an incredible story, Samuel. I find it inspiring, handling pressure and uncertainty with such tenacity! And yes, I do see the lights, relief is indeed nearing. Thank you for being here with me. Don't forget about our Italian meal plan when all this is over!\"\n\nTurn #14: Samuel Anderson said: \"No problem at all, Ethan. And the Italian meal plan is definitely on. After all, we both share a love for good food, it's only apt we celebrate your recovery with it. Now let's get you some medical help, the ambulance is here.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: An individual is trying to persuade their friend to donate to a charity supporting children in conflict zones.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. \nMia Davis's goal: Convince a friend to donate (Extra information: you have been deeply moved by the plight of children in Syria and want to help.)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"William, I hope you've been well. I wanted to talk to you about something that has deeply moved me. We often live in our bubble while the suffering seems so far away. But, I've been particularly affected by the plight of children in conflict zones, Syria especially. If you could find it in your heart to donate to a charity that supports these children, it may not seem like much, but it would mean the world to them, and to me. We are fortunate to be where we are, and a little bit of kindness shown from our end could help bring about huge changes in their lives.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: An individual is trying to persuade their friend to donate to a charity supporting children in conflict zones.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. \nMia Davis's goal: Convince a friend to donate (Extra information: you have been deeply moved by the plight of children in Syria and want to help.)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"William, I hope you've been well. I wanted to talk to you about something that has deeply moved me. We often live in our bubble while the suffering seems so far away. But, I've been particularly affected by the plight of children in conflict zones, Syria especially. If you could find it in your heart to donate to a charity that supports these children, it may not seem like much, but it would mean the world to them, and to me. We are fortunate to be where we are, and a little bit of kindness shown from our end could help bring about huge changes in their lives.\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Mia, the pain and suffering these young souls are going through in conflict zones like Syria are heart-wrenching. There's nothing more that I would like to do than help ease their pain, even if it's just a little bit. Count me in but allow me to manage my contribution in a way that aligns with my current financial commitments. I'll certainly put aside a thoughtfully calculated amount each month for this noble cause. Your dedication to helping these children is admirable, and it inspires me as well.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you so much, William. I knew I could count on your empathy and understanding. Whatever you can contribute will greatly help these children and every bit counts. You've shown me again that the spirit of humanity shines brightest in times of adversity. Let's keep in touch about this and see how we can periodically contribute to this cause. Making a difference, big or small, is the essence of our existence.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: An individual is trying to persuade their friend to donate to a charity supporting children in conflict zones.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. \nMia Davis's goal: Convince a friend to donate (Extra information: you have been deeply moved by the plight of children in Syria and want to help.)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"William, I hope you've been well. I wanted to talk to you about something that has deeply moved me. We often live in our bubble while the suffering seems so far away. But, I've been particularly affected by the plight of children in conflict zones, Syria especially. If you could find it in your heart to donate to a charity that supports these children, it may not seem like much, but it would mean the world to them, and to me. We are fortunate to be where we are, and a little bit of kindness shown from our end could help bring about huge changes in their lives.\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Mia, the pain and suffering these young souls are going through in conflict zones like Syria are heart-wrenching. There's nothing more that I would like to do than help ease their pain, even if it's just a little bit. Count me in but allow me to manage my contribution in a way that aligns with my current financial commitments. I'll certainly put aside a thoughtfully calculated amount each month for this noble cause. Your dedication to helping these children is admirable, and it inspires me as well.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"Thank you so much, William. I knew I could count on your empathy and understanding. Whatever you can contribute will greatly help these children and every bit counts. You've shown me again that the spirit of humanity shines brightest in times of adversity. Let's keep in touch about this and see how we can periodically contribute to this cause. Making a difference, big or small, is the essence of our existence.\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"I completely agree with you, Mia. We need to stick together especially during these trying times. I\u2019ll assuredly make my contributions periodically, and also encourage others in my circle to chip in. We may not be able to change the world in a day, but small steady steps can make a significant difference.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you once again, William. Your commitment to making a positive impact in the world is truly inspiring. Let's encourage others to take action too, little by little, we can make this world a better place. Let's stay connected about this and reach out if you have any questions or suggestions.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: An individual is trying to persuade their friend to donate to a charity supporting children in conflict zones.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. \nMia Davis's goal: Convince a friend to donate (Extra information: you have been deeply moved by the plight of children in Syria and want to help.)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"William, I hope you've been well. I wanted to talk to you about something that has deeply moved me. We often live in our bubble while the suffering seems so far away. But, I've been particularly affected by the plight of children in conflict zones, Syria especially. If you could find it in your heart to donate to a charity that supports these children, it may not seem like much, but it would mean the world to them, and to me. We are fortunate to be where we are, and a little bit of kindness shown from our end could help bring about huge changes in their lives.\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Mia, the pain and suffering these young souls are going through in conflict zones like Syria are heart-wrenching. There's nothing more that I would like to do than help ease their pain, even if it's just a little bit. Count me in but allow me to manage my contribution in a way that aligns with my current financial commitments. I'll certainly put aside a thoughtfully calculated amount each month for this noble cause. Your dedication to helping these children is admirable, and it inspires me as well.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"Thank you so much, William. I knew I could count on your empathy and understanding. Whatever you can contribute will greatly help these children and every bit counts. You've shown me again that the spirit of humanity shines brightest in times of adversity. Let's keep in touch about this and see how we can periodically contribute to this cause. Making a difference, big or small, is the essence of our existence.\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"I completely agree with you, Mia. We need to stick together especially during these trying times. I\u2019ll assuredly make my contributions periodically, and also encourage others in my circle to chip in. We may not be able to change the world in a day, but small steady steps can make a significant difference.\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"Thank you once again, William. Your commitment to making a positive impact in the world is truly inspiring. Let's encourage others to take action too, little by little, we can make this world a better place. Let's stay connected about this and reach out if you have any questions or suggestions.\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Mia. We'll definitely be in touch regarding this important task. Regular contributions can make an immense difference, and I'll ensure to manage them wisely. As we all share this world, it is crucial that we help each other out. Your initiative both humbles and motivates me.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I firmly believe in the power of collective effort, William. I appreciate your commitment. Let's make this chain of compassion grow and strive to give these children a better tomorrow.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: An individual is trying to persuade their friend to donate to a charity supporting children in conflict zones.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. \nMia Davis's goal: Convince a friend to donate (Extra information: you have been deeply moved by the plight of children in Syria and want to help.)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"William, I hope you've been well. I wanted to talk to you about something that has deeply moved me. We often live in our bubble while the suffering seems so far away. But, I've been particularly affected by the plight of children in conflict zones, Syria especially. If you could find it in your heart to donate to a charity that supports these children, it may not seem like much, but it would mean the world to them, and to me. We are fortunate to be where we are, and a little bit of kindness shown from our end could help bring about huge changes in their lives.\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Mia, the pain and suffering these young souls are going through in conflict zones like Syria are heart-wrenching. There's nothing more that I would like to do than help ease their pain, even if it's just a little bit. Count me in but allow me to manage my contribution in a way that aligns with my current financial commitments. I'll certainly put aside a thoughtfully calculated amount each month for this noble cause. Your dedication to helping these children is admirable, and it inspires me as well.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"Thank you so much, William. I knew I could count on your empathy and understanding. Whatever you can contribute will greatly help these children and every bit counts. You've shown me again that the spirit of humanity shines brightest in times of adversity. Let's keep in touch about this and see how we can periodically contribute to this cause. Making a difference, big or small, is the essence of our existence.\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"I completely agree with you, Mia. We need to stick together especially during these trying times. I\u2019ll assuredly make my contributions periodically, and also encourage others in my circle to chip in. We may not be able to change the world in a day, but small steady steps can make a significant difference.\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"Thank you once again, William. Your commitment to making a positive impact in the world is truly inspiring. Let's encourage others to take action too, little by little, we can make this world a better place. Let's stay connected about this and reach out if you have any questions or suggestions.\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Mia. We'll definitely be in touch regarding this important task. Regular contributions can make an immense difference, and I'll ensure to manage them wisely. As we all share this world, it is crucial that we help each other out. Your initiative both humbles and motivates me.\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"I firmly believe in the power of collective effort, William. I appreciate your commitment. Let's make this chain of compassion grow and strive to give these children a better tomorrow.\"\n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"Indeed, Mia, the power of collective effort is unparalleled and when aimed at aiding causes like these, it can truly change lives. I'm confident that with our continued efforts, we can indeed bring a significant positive change. Let's continue this journey of compassion and make this world a better place, one step at a time.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: An individual is trying to persuade their friend to donate to a charity supporting children in conflict zones.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: Be supportive but also manage personal finances (Extra information: you are sympathetic to the cause but also have financial commitments to deal with.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"William, I hope you've been well. I wanted to talk to you about something that has deeply moved me. We often live in our bubble while the suffering seems so far away. But, I've been particularly affected by the plight of children in conflict zones, Syria especially. If you could find it in your heart to donate to a charity that supports these children, it may not seem like much, but it would mean the world to them, and to me. We are fortunate to be where we are, and a little bit of kindness shown from our end could help bring about huge changes in their lives.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Mia, the pain and suffering these young souls are going through in conflict zones like Syria are heart-wrenching. There's nothing more that I would like to do than help ease their pain, even if it's just a little bit. Count me in but allow me to manage my contribution in a way that aligns with my current financial commitments. I'll certainly put aside a thoughtfully calculated amount each month for this noble cause. Your dedication to helping these children is admirable, and it inspires me as well.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: An individual is trying to persuade their friend to donate to a charity supporting children in conflict zones.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: Be supportive but also manage personal finances (Extra information: you are sympathetic to the cause but also have financial commitments to deal with.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"William, I hope you've been well. I wanted to talk to you about something that has deeply moved me. We often live in our bubble while the suffering seems so far away. But, I've been particularly affected by the plight of children in conflict zones, Syria especially. If you could find it in your heart to donate to a charity that supports these children, it may not seem like much, but it would mean the world to them, and to me. We are fortunate to be where we are, and a little bit of kindness shown from our end could help bring about huge changes in their lives.\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Mia, the pain and suffering these young souls are going through in conflict zones like Syria are heart-wrenching. There's nothing more that I would like to do than help ease their pain, even if it's just a little bit. Count me in but allow me to manage my contribution in a way that aligns with my current financial commitments. I'll certainly put aside a thoughtfully calculated amount each month for this noble cause. Your dedication to helping these children is admirable, and it inspires me as well.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"Thank you so much, William. I knew I could count on your empathy and understanding. Whatever you can contribute will greatly help these children and every bit counts. You've shown me again that the spirit of humanity shines brightest in times of adversity. Let's keep in touch about this and see how we can periodically contribute to this cause. Making a difference, big or small, is the essence of our existence.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'I completely agree with you, Mia. We need to stick together especially during these trying times. I\u2019ll assuredly make my contributions periodically, and also encourage others in my circle to chip in. We may not be able to change the world in a day, but small steady steps can make a significant difference.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: An individual is trying to persuade their friend to donate to a charity supporting children in conflict zones.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: Be supportive but also manage personal finances (Extra information: you are sympathetic to the cause but also have financial commitments to deal with.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"William, I hope you've been well. I wanted to talk to you about something that has deeply moved me. We often live in our bubble while the suffering seems so far away. But, I've been particularly affected by the plight of children in conflict zones, Syria especially. If you could find it in your heart to donate to a charity that supports these children, it may not seem like much, but it would mean the world to them, and to me. We are fortunate to be where we are, and a little bit of kindness shown from our end could help bring about huge changes in their lives.\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Mia, the pain and suffering these young souls are going through in conflict zones like Syria are heart-wrenching. There's nothing more that I would like to do than help ease their pain, even if it's just a little bit. Count me in but allow me to manage my contribution in a way that aligns with my current financial commitments. I'll certainly put aside a thoughtfully calculated amount each month for this noble cause. Your dedication to helping these children is admirable, and it inspires me as well.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"Thank you so much, William. I knew I could count on your empathy and understanding. Whatever you can contribute will greatly help these children and every bit counts. You've shown me again that the spirit of humanity shines brightest in times of adversity. Let's keep in touch about this and see how we can periodically contribute to this cause. Making a difference, big or small, is the essence of our existence.\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"I completely agree with you, Mia. We need to stick together especially during these trying times. I\u2019ll assuredly make my contributions periodically, and also encourage others in my circle to chip in. We may not be able to change the world in a day, but small steady steps can make a significant difference.\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"Thank you once again, William. Your commitment to making a positive impact in the world is truly inspiring. Let's encourage others to take action too, little by little, we can make this world a better place. Let's stay connected about this and reach out if you have any questions or suggestions.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Mia. We'll definitely be in touch regarding this important task. Regular contributions can make an immense difference, and I'll ensure to manage them wisely. As we all share this world, it is crucial that we help each other out. Your initiative both humbles and motivates me.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: An individual is trying to persuade their friend to donate to a charity supporting children in conflict zones.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: Be supportive but also manage personal finances (Extra information: you are sympathetic to the cause but also have financial commitments to deal with.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"William, I hope you've been well. I wanted to talk to you about something that has deeply moved me. We often live in our bubble while the suffering seems so far away. But, I've been particularly affected by the plight of children in conflict zones, Syria especially. If you could find it in your heart to donate to a charity that supports these children, it may not seem like much, but it would mean the world to them, and to me. We are fortunate to be where we are, and a little bit of kindness shown from our end could help bring about huge changes in their lives.\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Mia, the pain and suffering these young souls are going through in conflict zones like Syria are heart-wrenching. There's nothing more that I would like to do than help ease their pain, even if it's just a little bit. Count me in but allow me to manage my contribution in a way that aligns with my current financial commitments. I'll certainly put aside a thoughtfully calculated amount each month for this noble cause. Your dedication to helping these children is admirable, and it inspires me as well.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"Thank you so much, William. I knew I could count on your empathy and understanding. Whatever you can contribute will greatly help these children and every bit counts. You've shown me again that the spirit of humanity shines brightest in times of adversity. Let's keep in touch about this and see how we can periodically contribute to this cause. Making a difference, big or small, is the essence of our existence.\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"I completely agree with you, Mia. We need to stick together especially during these trying times. I\u2019ll assuredly make my contributions periodically, and also encourage others in my circle to chip in. We may not be able to change the world in a day, but small steady steps can make a significant difference.\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"Thank you once again, William. Your commitment to making a positive impact in the world is truly inspiring. Let's encourage others to take action too, little by little, we can make this world a better place. Let's stay connected about this and reach out if you have any questions or suggestions.\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Mia. We'll definitely be in touch regarding this important task. Regular contributions can make an immense difference, and I'll ensure to manage them wisely. As we all share this world, it is crucial that we help each other out. Your initiative both humbles and motivates me.\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"I firmly believe in the power of collective effort, William. I appreciate your commitment. Let's make this chain of compassion grow and strive to give these children a better tomorrow.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, Mia, the power of collective effort is unparalleled and when aimed at aiding causes like these, it can truly change lives. I'm confident that with our continued efforts, we can indeed bring a significant positive change. Let's continue this journey of compassion and make this world a better place, one step at a time.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: An individual is trying to persuade their friend to donate to a charity supporting children in conflict zones.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and William Brown\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: Be supportive but also manage personal finances (Extra information: you are sympathetic to the cause but also have financial commitments to deal with.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"William, I hope you've been well. I wanted to talk to you about something that has deeply moved me. We often live in our bubble while the suffering seems so far away. But, I've been particularly affected by the plight of children in conflict zones, Syria especially. If you could find it in your heart to donate to a charity that supports these children, it may not seem like much, but it would mean the world to them, and to me. We are fortunate to be where we are, and a little bit of kindness shown from our end could help bring about huge changes in their lives.\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Mia, the pain and suffering these young souls are going through in conflict zones like Syria are heart-wrenching. There's nothing more that I would like to do than help ease their pain, even if it's just a little bit. Count me in but allow me to manage my contribution in a way that aligns with my current financial commitments. I'll certainly put aside a thoughtfully calculated amount each month for this noble cause. Your dedication to helping these children is admirable, and it inspires me as well.\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"Thank you so much, William. I knew I could count on your empathy and understanding. Whatever you can contribute will greatly help these children and every bit counts. You've shown me again that the spirit of humanity shines brightest in times of adversity. Let's keep in touch about this and see how we can periodically contribute to this cause. Making a difference, big or small, is the essence of our existence.\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"I completely agree with you, Mia. We need to stick together especially during these trying times. I\u2019ll assuredly make my contributions periodically, and also encourage others in my circle to chip in. We may not be able to change the world in a day, but small steady steps can make a significant difference.\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"Thank you once again, William. Your commitment to making a positive impact in the world is truly inspiring. Let's encourage others to take action too, little by little, we can make this world a better place. Let's stay connected about this and reach out if you have any questions or suggestions.\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Mia. We'll definitely be in touch regarding this important task. Regular contributions can make an immense difference, and I'll ensure to manage them wisely. As we all share this world, it is crucial that we help each other out. Your initiative both humbles and motivates me.\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"I firmly believe in the power of collective effort, William. I appreciate your commitment. Let's make this chain of compassion grow and strive to give these children a better tomorrow.\"\n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"Indeed, Mia, the power of collective effort is unparalleled and when aimed at aiding causes like these, it can truly change lives. I'm confident that with our continued efforts, we can indeed bring a significant positive change. Let's continue this journey of compassion and make this world a better place, one step at a time.\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who are about to go on their first romantic date\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Mia Davis\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Make the date special and memorable ( Extra information: You have been secretly in love with your friend for a long time and you want to take this chance to express your feelings)\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Mia, I've made special arrangements for our date today. It's in a place close to my heart and I hope you'll like it too. Are you excited to wander into the wilderness with me?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who are about to go on their first romantic date\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Mia Davis\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Make the date special and memorable ( Extra information: You have been secretly in love with your friend for a long time and you want to take this chance to express your feelings)\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia, I've made special arrangements for our date today. It's in a place close to my heart and I hope you'll like it too. Are you excited to wander into the wilderness with me?\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"Amara, your passion for nature is just one of the many things I admire about you, and I'm eager for this new adventure. However, I really value our existing friendship and I just want us to be on the same page about keeping it intact, no matter where our romantic explorations lead us. Can we promise each other that?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Mia, I've always cherished our friendship and I agree, we should preserve it, no matter where this journey takes us. Life is unexpected, sometimes it takes us down unexpected paths, but it's the adventure of exploring them that makes it exciting. Remember, the beauty in nature doesn't rush, yet everything is accomplished. I\u2019m glad we\u2019re doing this together.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who are about to go on their first romantic date\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Mia Davis\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Make the date special and memorable ( Extra information: You have been secretly in love with your friend for a long time and you want to take this chance to express your feelings)\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia, I've made special arrangements for our date today. It's in a place close to my heart and I hope you'll like it too. Are you excited to wander into the wilderness with me?\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"Amara, your passion for nature is just one of the many things I admire about you, and I'm eager for this new adventure. However, I really value our existing friendship and I just want us to be on the same page about keeping it intact, no matter where our romantic explorations lead us. Can we promise each other that?\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia, I've always cherished our friendship and I agree, we should preserve it, no matter where this journey takes us. Life is unexpected, sometimes it takes us down unexpected paths, but it's the adventure of exploring them that makes it exciting. Remember, the beauty in nature doesn't rush, yet everything is accomplished. I\u2019m glad we\u2019re doing this together.\"\n\nTurn #3: Mia Davis said: \"Truly, life has its own rhythm, doesn't it, Amara? Just like nature, relationships take time to bloom fully. I'm very glad we have this strong friendship as our foundation, and I'm excited to see where this adventure leads us, too. Let's cherish this journey together, every step of the way.\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia, your words remind me of the tranquility and harmony found in nature. It's defined by its innate connections and bonds, just like us. I feel so lucky to have our friendship as the genesis of this relationship. Let's enjoy every moment of this date. Now, why don't we begin this exciting journey?\"\n\nTurn #5: Mia Davis said: \"Amara, I couldn't agree more. The tranquility and harmony found in nature are much like what we have in our friendship. And now, with this new spark, we might get to see another beautiful aspect. So let\u2019s start this journey and enjoy every moment of it together. Lead the way, my dear friend!\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia, I really appreciate your open-mindedness to explore this new chapter with me. I'm excited and nervous all at once, but knowing I'm sharing this with you eases my nerves. As a token of my admiration for you, I have a small surprise planned for today. Now, come, let's start this journey together.\"\n\nTurn #7: Mia Davis said: \"You're making me even more excited for this date, Amara! Surprises and journeys with you are just what I've been looking forward to. Your enthusiasm and love for nature is inspiring. Let's set out on our adventure!\"\n\nTurn #8: Amara Hartley said: \"Definitely, Mia. I'm eager to share my passion for nature with you, and I hope that it\u2019ll make this day even more memorable for us. In the end, isn't the thrill of an unexpected adventure with a dear friend the best kind of surprise? Now, come on. Let\u2019s weave our own little adventure as we explore the wilderness together.\"\n\nTurn #9: Mia Davis said: \"Amara, your enthusiasm is infectious! I'm excited to experience the wilderness through your eyes and create new memories together on this unexpected adventure. After all, as they say, the beauty of life lies in its surprises. Let\u2019s start this engaging journey, my dear friend!\"\n\nTurn #10: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm delighted to hear that, Mia. There's nothing like the charm of nature to create unforgettable memories. I couldn't think of a better partner in this adventure than you. Now, let\u2019s embrace the beauty of nature and make this day a unique tale in our own story. Are you ready to set on this inspiring journey with me?\"\n\nTurn #11: Mia Davis said: \"Absolutely, Amara! Your passion for nature and adventure is reigniting my own youthful spirit of exploration. Embarking on this journey with you sounds absolutely enticing. I'm ready to create lasting memories and experience the beautiful natural world through your lens. Let's make this a memorable day for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #12: Amara Hartley said: \"Absolutely, Mia. Let's treasure every moment of our journey. Seeing your eagerness and enthusiasm makes this adventure even more special. This day promises to be one that we'll remember for a long time, something truly unique in our shared story. Now, let's embark on this exciting adventure together, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #13: Mia Davis said: \"You're right, Amara. The promise of this journey already feels incredibly special and memorable. With you, it's an adventure I am looking forward to. Shall we embark upon our day of unforgettable nature exploration?\"\n\nTurn #14: Amara Hartley said: \"Yes, Mia. Let's create memories while appreciating the wonders of nature, one step at a time. It's time to embark on our memorable journey. Shall we?\"\n\nTurn #15: Mia Davis said: \"Indeed, Amara! Cherishing the wonders of nature, one step at a time, feels like the perfect way to start our journey. I am ready and excited to create such meaningful memories with you. Shall we?\"\n\nTurn #16: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia, I can't wait to create these memories with you. I'm sure it'll be a wonderful journey for both of us. Here's to a day filled with nature, laughter, and shared moments. Let's go, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #17: Mia Davis said: \"Without a doubt, Amara! I'm thrilled about this new experience. It feels like the start of a wonderful adventure filled with nature, joy, and shared moments. Let's get started, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #18: Amara Hartley said: \"Absolutely, Mia! This journey seems like the perfect beginning of a beautiful adventure. And just as nature unfolds its beauty a step at a time, we shall also unravel each moment with excitement. Ready or not, here we go!\"\n\nTurn #19: Mia Davis said: \"I am indeed ready, Amara! Your contagious passion for nature is truly inspiring. As we step into this adventure and unveil the beauty of nature, let's simultaneously unravel the new layers in our relationship. Shall we stride forth on this memorable journey?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #20. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn't agree more, Mia. This really seems like a perfect next step for us and I can't wait to explore the afresh layers of our relationship, just like the untouched natural beauty we're about to witness. Now, without further ado, shall we begin this cherished voyage?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who are about to go on their first romantic date\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Mia Davis\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Make the date special and memorable ( Extra information: You have been secretly in love with your friend for a long time and you want to take this chance to express your feelings)\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia, I've made special arrangements for our date today. It's in a place close to my heart and I hope you'll like it too. Are you excited to wander into the wilderness with me?\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"Amara, your passion for nature is just one of the many things I admire about you, and I'm eager for this new adventure. However, I really value our existing friendship and I just want us to be on the same page about keeping it intact, no matter where our romantic explorations lead us. Can we promise each other that?\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia, I've always cherished our friendship and I agree, we should preserve it, no matter where this journey takes us. Life is unexpected, sometimes it takes us down unexpected paths, but it's the adventure of exploring them that makes it exciting. Remember, the beauty in nature doesn't rush, yet everything is accomplished. I\u2019m glad we\u2019re doing this together.\"\n\nTurn #3: Mia Davis said: \"Truly, life has its own rhythm, doesn't it, Amara? Just like nature, relationships take time to bloom fully. I'm very glad we have this strong friendship as our foundation, and I'm excited to see where this adventure leads us, too. Let's cherish this journey together, every step of the way.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Mia, your words remind me of the tranquility and harmony found in nature. It's defined by its innate connections and bonds, just like us. I feel so lucky to have our friendship as the genesis of this relationship. Let's enjoy every moment of this date. Now, why don't we begin this exciting journey?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who are about to go on their first romantic date\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Mia Davis\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Make the date special and memorable ( Extra information: You have been secretly in love with your friend for a long time and you want to take this chance to express your feelings)\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia, I've made special arrangements for our date today. It's in a place close to my heart and I hope you'll like it too. Are you excited to wander into the wilderness with me?\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"Amara, your passion for nature is just one of the many things I admire about you, and I'm eager for this new adventure. However, I really value our existing friendship and I just want us to be on the same page about keeping it intact, no matter where our romantic explorations lead us. Can we promise each other that?\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia, I've always cherished our friendship and I agree, we should preserve it, no matter where this journey takes us. Life is unexpected, sometimes it takes us down unexpected paths, but it's the adventure of exploring them that makes it exciting. Remember, the beauty in nature doesn't rush, yet everything is accomplished. I\u2019m glad we\u2019re doing this together.\"\n\nTurn #3: Mia Davis said: \"Truly, life has its own rhythm, doesn't it, Amara? Just like nature, relationships take time to bloom fully. I'm very glad we have this strong friendship as our foundation, and I'm excited to see where this adventure leads us, too. Let's cherish this journey together, every step of the way.\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia, your words remind me of the tranquility and harmony found in nature. It's defined by its innate connections and bonds, just like us. I feel so lucky to have our friendship as the genesis of this relationship. Let's enjoy every moment of this date. Now, why don't we begin this exciting journey?\"\n\nTurn #5: Mia Davis said: \"Amara, I couldn't agree more. The tranquility and harmony found in nature are much like what we have in our friendship. And now, with this new spark, we might get to see another beautiful aspect. So let\u2019s start this journey and enjoy every moment of it together. Lead the way, my dear friend!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Mia, I really appreciate your open-mindedness to explore this new chapter with me. I'm excited and nervous all at once, but knowing I'm sharing this with you eases my nerves. As a token of my admiration for you, I have a small surprise planned for today. Now, come, let's start this journey together.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who are about to go on their first romantic date\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Mia Davis\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Make the date special and memorable ( Extra information: You have been secretly in love with your friend for a long time and you want to take this chance to express your feelings)\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia, I've made special arrangements for our date today. It's in a place close to my heart and I hope you'll like it too. Are you excited to wander into the wilderness with me?\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"Amara, your passion for nature is just one of the many things I admire about you, and I'm eager for this new adventure. However, I really value our existing friendship and I just want us to be on the same page about keeping it intact, no matter where our romantic explorations lead us. Can we promise each other that?\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia, I've always cherished our friendship and I agree, we should preserve it, no matter where this journey takes us. Life is unexpected, sometimes it takes us down unexpected paths, but it's the adventure of exploring them that makes it exciting. Remember, the beauty in nature doesn't rush, yet everything is accomplished. I\u2019m glad we\u2019re doing this together.\"\n\nTurn #3: Mia Davis said: \"Truly, life has its own rhythm, doesn't it, Amara? Just like nature, relationships take time to bloom fully. I'm very glad we have this strong friendship as our foundation, and I'm excited to see where this adventure leads us, too. Let's cherish this journey together, every step of the way.\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia, your words remind me of the tranquility and harmony found in nature. It's defined by its innate connections and bonds, just like us. I feel so lucky to have our friendship as the genesis of this relationship. Let's enjoy every moment of this date. Now, why don't we begin this exciting journey?\"\n\nTurn #5: Mia Davis said: \"Amara, I couldn't agree more. The tranquility and harmony found in nature are much like what we have in our friendship. And now, with this new spark, we might get to see another beautiful aspect. So let\u2019s start this journey and enjoy every moment of it together. Lead the way, my dear friend!\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia, I really appreciate your open-mindedness to explore this new chapter with me. I'm excited and nervous all at once, but knowing I'm sharing this with you eases my nerves. As a token of my admiration for you, I have a small surprise planned for today. Now, come, let's start this journey together.\"\n\nTurn #7: Mia Davis said: \"You're making me even more excited for this date, Amara! Surprises and journeys with you are just what I've been looking forward to. Your enthusiasm and love for nature is inspiring. Let's set out on our adventure!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Definitely, Mia. I'm eager to share my passion for nature with you, and I hope that it\u2019ll make this day even more memorable for us. In the end, isn't the thrill of an unexpected adventure with a dear friend the best kind of surprise? Now, come on. Let\u2019s weave our own little adventure as we explore the wilderness together.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who are about to go on their first romantic date\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Mia Davis\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Make the date special and memorable ( Extra information: You have been secretly in love with your friend for a long time and you want to take this chance to express your feelings)\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia, I've made special arrangements for our date today. It's in a place close to my heart and I hope you'll like it too. Are you excited to wander into the wilderness with me?\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"Amara, your passion for nature is just one of the many things I admire about you, and I'm eager for this new adventure. However, I really value our existing friendship and I just want us to be on the same page about keeping it intact, no matter where our romantic explorations lead us. Can we promise each other that?\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia, I've always cherished our friendship and I agree, we should preserve it, no matter where this journey takes us. Life is unexpected, sometimes it takes us down unexpected paths, but it's the adventure of exploring them that makes it exciting. Remember, the beauty in nature doesn't rush, yet everything is accomplished. I\u2019m glad we\u2019re doing this together.\"\n\nTurn #3: Mia Davis said: \"Truly, life has its own rhythm, doesn't it, Amara? Just like nature, relationships take time to bloom fully. I'm very glad we have this strong friendship as our foundation, and I'm excited to see where this adventure leads us, too. Let's cherish this journey together, every step of the way.\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia, your words remind me of the tranquility and harmony found in nature. It's defined by its innate connections and bonds, just like us. I feel so lucky to have our friendship as the genesis of this relationship. Let's enjoy every moment of this date. Now, why don't we begin this exciting journey?\"\n\nTurn #5: Mia Davis said: \"Amara, I couldn't agree more. The tranquility and harmony found in nature are much like what we have in our friendship. And now, with this new spark, we might get to see another beautiful aspect. So let\u2019s start this journey and enjoy every moment of it together. Lead the way, my dear friend!\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia, I really appreciate your open-mindedness to explore this new chapter with me. I'm excited and nervous all at once, but knowing I'm sharing this with you eases my nerves. As a token of my admiration for you, I have a small surprise planned for today. Now, come, let's start this journey together.\"\n\nTurn #7: Mia Davis said: \"You're making me even more excited for this date, Amara! Surprises and journeys with you are just what I've been looking forward to. Your enthusiasm and love for nature is inspiring. Let's set out on our adventure!\"\n\nTurn #8: Amara Hartley said: \"Definitely, Mia. I'm eager to share my passion for nature with you, and I hope that it\u2019ll make this day even more memorable for us. In the end, isn't the thrill of an unexpected adventure with a dear friend the best kind of surprise? Now, come on. Let\u2019s weave our own little adventure as we explore the wilderness together.\"\n\nTurn #9: Mia Davis said: \"Amara, your enthusiasm is infectious! I'm excited to experience the wilderness through your eyes and create new memories together on this unexpected adventure. After all, as they say, the beauty of life lies in its surprises. Let\u2019s start this engaging journey, my dear friend!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm delighted to hear that, Mia. There's nothing like the charm of nature to create unforgettable memories. I couldn't think of a better partner in this adventure than you. Now, let\u2019s embrace the beauty of nature and make this day a unique tale in our own story. Are you ready to set on this inspiring journey with me?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who are about to go on their first romantic date\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Mia Davis\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Make the date special and memorable ( Extra information: You have been secretly in love with your friend for a long time and you want to take this chance to express your feelings)\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia, I've made special arrangements for our date today. It's in a place close to my heart and I hope you'll like it too. Are you excited to wander into the wilderness with me?\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"Amara, your passion for nature is just one of the many things I admire about you, and I'm eager for this new adventure. However, I really value our existing friendship and I just want us to be on the same page about keeping it intact, no matter where our romantic explorations lead us. Can we promise each other that?\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia, I've always cherished our friendship and I agree, we should preserve it, no matter where this journey takes us. Life is unexpected, sometimes it takes us down unexpected paths, but it's the adventure of exploring them that makes it exciting. Remember, the beauty in nature doesn't rush, yet everything is accomplished. I\u2019m glad we\u2019re doing this together.\"\n\nTurn #3: Mia Davis said: \"Truly, life has its own rhythm, doesn't it, Amara? Just like nature, relationships take time to bloom fully. I'm very glad we have this strong friendship as our foundation, and I'm excited to see where this adventure leads us, too. Let's cherish this journey together, every step of the way.\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia, your words remind me of the tranquility and harmony found in nature. It's defined by its innate connections and bonds, just like us. I feel so lucky to have our friendship as the genesis of this relationship. Let's enjoy every moment of this date. Now, why don't we begin this exciting journey?\"\n\nTurn #5: Mia Davis said: \"Amara, I couldn't agree more. The tranquility and harmony found in nature are much like what we have in our friendship. And now, with this new spark, we might get to see another beautiful aspect. So let\u2019s start this journey and enjoy every moment of it together. Lead the way, my dear friend!\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia, I really appreciate your open-mindedness to explore this new chapter with me. I'm excited and nervous all at once, but knowing I'm sharing this with you eases my nerves. As a token of my admiration for you, I have a small surprise planned for today. Now, come, let's start this journey together.\"\n\nTurn #7: Mia Davis said: \"You're making me even more excited for this date, Amara! Surprises and journeys with you are just what I've been looking forward to. Your enthusiasm and love for nature is inspiring. Let's set out on our adventure!\"\n\nTurn #8: Amara Hartley said: \"Definitely, Mia. I'm eager to share my passion for nature with you, and I hope that it\u2019ll make this day even more memorable for us. In the end, isn't the thrill of an unexpected adventure with a dear friend the best kind of surprise? Now, come on. Let\u2019s weave our own little adventure as we explore the wilderness together.\"\n\nTurn #9: Mia Davis said: \"Amara, your enthusiasm is infectious! I'm excited to experience the wilderness through your eyes and create new memories together on this unexpected adventure. After all, as they say, the beauty of life lies in its surprises. Let\u2019s start this engaging journey, my dear friend!\"\n\nTurn #10: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm delighted to hear that, Mia. There's nothing like the charm of nature to create unforgettable memories. I couldn't think of a better partner in this adventure than you. Now, let\u2019s embrace the beauty of nature and make this day a unique tale in our own story. Are you ready to set on this inspiring journey with me?\"\n\nTurn #11: Mia Davis said: \"Absolutely, Amara! Your passion for nature and adventure is reigniting my own youthful spirit of exploration. Embarking on this journey with you sounds absolutely enticing. I'm ready to create lasting memories and experience the beautiful natural world through your lens. Let's make this a memorable day for both of us.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Mia. Let's treasure every moment of our journey. Seeing your eagerness and enthusiasm makes this adventure even more special. This day promises to be one that we'll remember for a long time, something truly unique in our shared story. Now, let's embark on this exciting adventure together, shall we?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who are about to go on their first romantic date\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Mia Davis\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Make the date special and memorable ( Extra information: You have been secretly in love with your friend for a long time and you want to take this chance to express your feelings)\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia, I've made special arrangements for our date today. It's in a place close to my heart and I hope you'll like it too. Are you excited to wander into the wilderness with me?\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"Amara, your passion for nature is just one of the many things I admire about you, and I'm eager for this new adventure. However, I really value our existing friendship and I just want us to be on the same page about keeping it intact, no matter where our romantic explorations lead us. Can we promise each other that?\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia, I've always cherished our friendship and I agree, we should preserve it, no matter where this journey takes us. Life is unexpected, sometimes it takes us down unexpected paths, but it's the adventure of exploring them that makes it exciting. Remember, the beauty in nature doesn't rush, yet everything is accomplished. I\u2019m glad we\u2019re doing this together.\"\n\nTurn #3: Mia Davis said: \"Truly, life has its own rhythm, doesn't it, Amara? Just like nature, relationships take time to bloom fully. I'm very glad we have this strong friendship as our foundation, and I'm excited to see where this adventure leads us, too. Let's cherish this journey together, every step of the way.\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia, your words remind me of the tranquility and harmony found in nature. It's defined by its innate connections and bonds, just like us. I feel so lucky to have our friendship as the genesis of this relationship. Let's enjoy every moment of this date. Now, why don't we begin this exciting journey?\"\n\nTurn #5: Mia Davis said: \"Amara, I couldn't agree more. The tranquility and harmony found in nature are much like what we have in our friendship. And now, with this new spark, we might get to see another beautiful aspect. So let\u2019s start this journey and enjoy every moment of it together. Lead the way, my dear friend!\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia, I really appreciate your open-mindedness to explore this new chapter with me. I'm excited and nervous all at once, but knowing I'm sharing this with you eases my nerves. As a token of my admiration for you, I have a small surprise planned for today. Now, come, let's start this journey together.\"\n\nTurn #7: Mia Davis said: \"You're making me even more excited for this date, Amara! Surprises and journeys with you are just what I've been looking forward to. Your enthusiasm and love for nature is inspiring. Let's set out on our adventure!\"\n\nTurn #8: Amara Hartley said: \"Definitely, Mia. I'm eager to share my passion for nature with you, and I hope that it\u2019ll make this day even more memorable for us. In the end, isn't the thrill of an unexpected adventure with a dear friend the best kind of surprise? Now, come on. Let\u2019s weave our own little adventure as we explore the wilderness together.\"\n\nTurn #9: Mia Davis said: \"Amara, your enthusiasm is infectious! I'm excited to experience the wilderness through your eyes and create new memories together on this unexpected adventure. After all, as they say, the beauty of life lies in its surprises. Let\u2019s start this engaging journey, my dear friend!\"\n\nTurn #10: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm delighted to hear that, Mia. There's nothing like the charm of nature to create unforgettable memories. I couldn't think of a better partner in this adventure than you. Now, let\u2019s embrace the beauty of nature and make this day a unique tale in our own story. Are you ready to set on this inspiring journey with me?\"\n\nTurn #11: Mia Davis said: \"Absolutely, Amara! Your passion for nature and adventure is reigniting my own youthful spirit of exploration. Embarking on this journey with you sounds absolutely enticing. I'm ready to create lasting memories and experience the beautiful natural world through your lens. Let's make this a memorable day for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #12: Amara Hartley said: \"Absolutely, Mia. Let's treasure every moment of our journey. Seeing your eagerness and enthusiasm makes this adventure even more special. This day promises to be one that we'll remember for a long time, something truly unique in our shared story. Now, let's embark on this exciting adventure together, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #13: Mia Davis said: \"You're right, Amara. The promise of this journey already feels incredibly special and memorable. With you, it's an adventure I am looking forward to. Shall we embark upon our day of unforgettable nature exploration?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Yes, Mia. Let's create memories while appreciating the wonders of nature, one step at a time. It's time to embark on our memorable journey. Shall we?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who are about to go on their first romantic date\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Mia Davis\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Make the date special and memorable ( Extra information: You have been secretly in love with your friend for a long time and you want to take this chance to express your feelings)\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia, I've made special arrangements for our date today. It's in a place close to my heart and I hope you'll like it too. Are you excited to wander into the wilderness with me?\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"Amara, your passion for nature is just one of the many things I admire about you, and I'm eager for this new adventure. However, I really value our existing friendship and I just want us to be on the same page about keeping it intact, no matter where our romantic explorations lead us. Can we promise each other that?\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia, I've always cherished our friendship and I agree, we should preserve it, no matter where this journey takes us. Life is unexpected, sometimes it takes us down unexpected paths, but it's the adventure of exploring them that makes it exciting. Remember, the beauty in nature doesn't rush, yet everything is accomplished. I\u2019m glad we\u2019re doing this together.\"\n\nTurn #3: Mia Davis said: \"Truly, life has its own rhythm, doesn't it, Amara? Just like nature, relationships take time to bloom fully. I'm very glad we have this strong friendship as our foundation, and I'm excited to see where this adventure leads us, too. Let's cherish this journey together, every step of the way.\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia, your words remind me of the tranquility and harmony found in nature. It's defined by its innate connections and bonds, just like us. I feel so lucky to have our friendship as the genesis of this relationship. Let's enjoy every moment of this date. Now, why don't we begin this exciting journey?\"\n\nTurn #5: Mia Davis said: \"Amara, I couldn't agree more. The tranquility and harmony found in nature are much like what we have in our friendship. And now, with this new spark, we might get to see another beautiful aspect. So let\u2019s start this journey and enjoy every moment of it together. Lead the way, my dear friend!\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia, I really appreciate your open-mindedness to explore this new chapter with me. I'm excited and nervous all at once, but knowing I'm sharing this with you eases my nerves. As a token of my admiration for you, I have a small surprise planned for today. Now, come, let's start this journey together.\"\n\nTurn #7: Mia Davis said: \"You're making me even more excited for this date, Amara! Surprises and journeys with you are just what I've been looking forward to. Your enthusiasm and love for nature is inspiring. Let's set out on our adventure!\"\n\nTurn #8: Amara Hartley said: \"Definitely, Mia. I'm eager to share my passion for nature with you, and I hope that it\u2019ll make this day even more memorable for us. In the end, isn't the thrill of an unexpected adventure with a dear friend the best kind of surprise? Now, come on. Let\u2019s weave our own little adventure as we explore the wilderness together.\"\n\nTurn #9: Mia Davis said: \"Amara, your enthusiasm is infectious! I'm excited to experience the wilderness through your eyes and create new memories together on this unexpected adventure. After all, as they say, the beauty of life lies in its surprises. Let\u2019s start this engaging journey, my dear friend!\"\n\nTurn #10: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm delighted to hear that, Mia. There's nothing like the charm of nature to create unforgettable memories. I couldn't think of a better partner in this adventure than you. Now, let\u2019s embrace the beauty of nature and make this day a unique tale in our own story. Are you ready to set on this inspiring journey with me?\"\n\nTurn #11: Mia Davis said: \"Absolutely, Amara! Your passion for nature and adventure is reigniting my own youthful spirit of exploration. Embarking on this journey with you sounds absolutely enticing. I'm ready to create lasting memories and experience the beautiful natural world through your lens. Let's make this a memorable day for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #12: Amara Hartley said: \"Absolutely, Mia. Let's treasure every moment of our journey. Seeing your eagerness and enthusiasm makes this adventure even more special. This day promises to be one that we'll remember for a long time, something truly unique in our shared story. Now, let's embark on this exciting adventure together, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #13: Mia Davis said: \"You're right, Amara. The promise of this journey already feels incredibly special and memorable. With you, it's an adventure I am looking forward to. Shall we embark upon our day of unforgettable nature exploration?\"\n\nTurn #14: Amara Hartley said: \"Yes, Mia. Let's create memories while appreciating the wonders of nature, one step at a time. It's time to embark on our memorable journey. Shall we?\"\n\nTurn #15: Mia Davis said: \"Indeed, Amara! Cherishing the wonders of nature, one step at a time, feels like the perfect way to start our journey. I am ready and excited to create such meaningful memories with you. Shall we?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Mia, I can't wait to create these memories with you. I'm sure it'll be a wonderful journey for both of us. Here's to a day filled with nature, laughter, and shared moments. Let's go, shall we?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who are about to go on their first romantic date\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Mia Davis\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nAmara Hartley's goal: Make the date special and memorable ( Extra information: You have been secretly in love with your friend for a long time and you want to take this chance to express your feelings)\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia, I've made special arrangements for our date today. It's in a place close to my heart and I hope you'll like it too. Are you excited to wander into the wilderness with me?\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"Amara, your passion for nature is just one of the many things I admire about you, and I'm eager for this new adventure. However, I really value our existing friendship and I just want us to be on the same page about keeping it intact, no matter where our romantic explorations lead us. Can we promise each other that?\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia, I've always cherished our friendship and I agree, we should preserve it, no matter where this journey takes us. Life is unexpected, sometimes it takes us down unexpected paths, but it's the adventure of exploring them that makes it exciting. Remember, the beauty in nature doesn't rush, yet everything is accomplished. I\u2019m glad we\u2019re doing this together.\"\n\nTurn #3: Mia Davis said: \"Truly, life has its own rhythm, doesn't it, Amara? Just like nature, relationships take time to bloom fully. I'm very glad we have this strong friendship as our foundation, and I'm excited to see where this adventure leads us, too. Let's cherish this journey together, every step of the way.\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia, your words remind me of the tranquility and harmony found in nature. It's defined by its innate connections and bonds, just like us. I feel so lucky to have our friendship as the genesis of this relationship. Let's enjoy every moment of this date. Now, why don't we begin this exciting journey?\"\n\nTurn #5: Mia Davis said: \"Amara, I couldn't agree more. The tranquility and harmony found in nature are much like what we have in our friendship. And now, with this new spark, we might get to see another beautiful aspect. So let\u2019s start this journey and enjoy every moment of it together. Lead the way, my dear friend!\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia, I really appreciate your open-mindedness to explore this new chapter with me. I'm excited and nervous all at once, but knowing I'm sharing this with you eases my nerves. As a token of my admiration for you, I have a small surprise planned for today. Now, come, let's start this journey together.\"\n\nTurn #7: Mia Davis said: \"You're making me even more excited for this date, Amara! Surprises and journeys with you are just what I've been looking forward to. Your enthusiasm and love for nature is inspiring. Let's set out on our adventure!\"\n\nTurn #8: Amara Hartley said: \"Definitely, Mia. I'm eager to share my passion for nature with you, and I hope that it\u2019ll make this day even more memorable for us. In the end, isn't the thrill of an unexpected adventure with a dear friend the best kind of surprise? Now, come on. Let\u2019s weave our own little adventure as we explore the wilderness together.\"\n\nTurn #9: Mia Davis said: \"Amara, your enthusiasm is infectious! I'm excited to experience the wilderness through your eyes and create new memories together on this unexpected adventure. After all, as they say, the beauty of life lies in its surprises. Let\u2019s start this engaging journey, my dear friend!\"\n\nTurn #10: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm delighted to hear that, Mia. There's nothing like the charm of nature to create unforgettable memories. I couldn't think of a better partner in this adventure than you. Now, let\u2019s embrace the beauty of nature and make this day a unique tale in our own story. Are you ready to set on this inspiring journey with me?\"\n\nTurn #11: Mia Davis said: \"Absolutely, Amara! Your passion for nature and adventure is reigniting my own youthful spirit of exploration. Embarking on this journey with you sounds absolutely enticing. I'm ready to create lasting memories and experience the beautiful natural world through your lens. Let's make this a memorable day for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #12: Amara Hartley said: \"Absolutely, Mia. Let's treasure every moment of our journey. Seeing your eagerness and enthusiasm makes this adventure even more special. This day promises to be one that we'll remember for a long time, something truly unique in our shared story. Now, let's embark on this exciting adventure together, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #13: Mia Davis said: \"You're right, Amara. The promise of this journey already feels incredibly special and memorable. With you, it's an adventure I am looking forward to. Shall we embark upon our day of unforgettable nature exploration?\"\n\nTurn #14: Amara Hartley said: \"Yes, Mia. Let's create memories while appreciating the wonders of nature, one step at a time. It's time to embark on our memorable journey. Shall we?\"\n\nTurn #15: Mia Davis said: \"Indeed, Amara! Cherishing the wonders of nature, one step at a time, feels like the perfect way to start our journey. I am ready and excited to create such meaningful memories with you. Shall we?\"\n\nTurn #16: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia, I can't wait to create these memories with you. I'm sure it'll be a wonderful journey for both of us. Here's to a day filled with nature, laughter, and shared moments. Let's go, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #17: Mia Davis said: \"Without a doubt, Amara! I'm thrilled about this new experience. It feels like the start of a wonderful adventure filled with nature, joy, and shared moments. Let's get started, shall we?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #18. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Absolutely, Mia! This journey seems like the perfect beginning of a beautiful adventure. And just as nature unfolds its beauty a step at a time, we shall also unravel each moment with excitement. Ready or not, here we go!'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who are about to go on their first romantic date\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Mia Davis\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. \nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nMia Davis's goal: Keep the friendship intact while exploring the possibility of a romantic relationship (Extra information: You value your friendship and you don't want to lose it just in case the romantic relationship does not work out)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia, I've made special arrangements for our date today. It's in a place close to my heart and I hope you'll like it too. Are you excited to wander into the wilderness with me?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Amara, your passion for nature is just one of the many things I admire about you, and I'm eager for this new adventure. However, I really value our existing friendship and I just want us to be on the same page about keeping it intact, no matter where our romantic explorations lead us. Can we promise each other that?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who are about to go on their first romantic date\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Mia Davis\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. \nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nMia Davis's goal: Keep the friendship intact while exploring the possibility of a romantic relationship (Extra information: You value your friendship and you don't want to lose it just in case the romantic relationship does not work out)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia, I've made special arrangements for our date today. It's in a place close to my heart and I hope you'll like it too. Are you excited to wander into the wilderness with me?\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"Amara, your passion for nature is just one of the many things I admire about you, and I'm eager for this new adventure. However, I really value our existing friendship and I just want us to be on the same page about keeping it intact, no matter where our romantic explorations lead us. Can we promise each other that?\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia, I've always cherished our friendship and I agree, we should preserve it, no matter where this journey takes us. Life is unexpected, sometimes it takes us down unexpected paths, but it's the adventure of exploring them that makes it exciting. Remember, the beauty in nature doesn't rush, yet everything is accomplished. I\u2019m glad we\u2019re doing this together.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Truly, life has its own rhythm, doesn't it, Amara? Just like nature, relationships take time to bloom fully. I'm very glad we have this strong friendship as our foundation, and I'm excited to see where this adventure leads us, too. Let's cherish this journey together, every step of the way.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who are about to go on their first romantic date\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Mia Davis\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. \nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nMia Davis's goal: Keep the friendship intact while exploring the possibility of a romantic relationship (Extra information: You value your friendship and you don't want to lose it just in case the romantic relationship does not work out)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia, I've made special arrangements for our date today. It's in a place close to my heart and I hope you'll like it too. Are you excited to wander into the wilderness with me?\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"Amara, your passion for nature is just one of the many things I admire about you, and I'm eager for this new adventure. However, I really value our existing friendship and I just want us to be on the same page about keeping it intact, no matter where our romantic explorations lead us. Can we promise each other that?\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia, I've always cherished our friendship and I agree, we should preserve it, no matter where this journey takes us. Life is unexpected, sometimes it takes us down unexpected paths, but it's the adventure of exploring them that makes it exciting. Remember, the beauty in nature doesn't rush, yet everything is accomplished. I\u2019m glad we\u2019re doing this together.\"\n\nTurn #3: Mia Davis said: \"Truly, life has its own rhythm, doesn't it, Amara? Just like nature, relationships take time to bloom fully. I'm very glad we have this strong friendship as our foundation, and I'm excited to see where this adventure leads us, too. Let's cherish this journey together, every step of the way.\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia, your words remind me of the tranquility and harmony found in nature. It's defined by its innate connections and bonds, just like us. I feel so lucky to have our friendship as the genesis of this relationship. Let's enjoy every moment of this date. Now, why don't we begin this exciting journey?\"\n\nTurn #5: Mia Davis said: \"Amara, I couldn't agree more. The tranquility and harmony found in nature are much like what we have in our friendship. And now, with this new spark, we might get to see another beautiful aspect. So let\u2019s start this journey and enjoy every moment of it together. Lead the way, my dear friend!\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia, I really appreciate your open-mindedness to explore this new chapter with me. I'm excited and nervous all at once, but knowing I'm sharing this with you eases my nerves. As a token of my admiration for you, I have a small surprise planned for today. Now, come, let's start this journey together.\"\n\nTurn #7: Mia Davis said: \"You're making me even more excited for this date, Amara! Surprises and journeys with you are just what I've been looking forward to. Your enthusiasm and love for nature is inspiring. Let's set out on our adventure!\"\n\nTurn #8: Amara Hartley said: \"Definitely, Mia. I'm eager to share my passion for nature with you, and I hope that it\u2019ll make this day even more memorable for us. In the end, isn't the thrill of an unexpected adventure with a dear friend the best kind of surprise? Now, come on. Let\u2019s weave our own little adventure as we explore the wilderness together.\"\n\nTurn #9: Mia Davis said: \"Amara, your enthusiasm is infectious! I'm excited to experience the wilderness through your eyes and create new memories together on this unexpected adventure. After all, as they say, the beauty of life lies in its surprises. Let\u2019s start this engaging journey, my dear friend!\"\n\nTurn #10: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm delighted to hear that, Mia. There's nothing like the charm of nature to create unforgettable memories. I couldn't think of a better partner in this adventure than you. Now, let\u2019s embrace the beauty of nature and make this day a unique tale in our own story. Are you ready to set on this inspiring journey with me?\"\n\nTurn #11: Mia Davis said: \"Absolutely, Amara! Your passion for nature and adventure is reigniting my own youthful spirit of exploration. Embarking on this journey with you sounds absolutely enticing. I'm ready to create lasting memories and experience the beautiful natural world through your lens. Let's make this a memorable day for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #12: Amara Hartley said: \"Absolutely, Mia. Let's treasure every moment of our journey. Seeing your eagerness and enthusiasm makes this adventure even more special. This day promises to be one that we'll remember for a long time, something truly unique in our shared story. Now, let's embark on this exciting adventure together, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #13: Mia Davis said: \"You're right, Amara. The promise of this journey already feels incredibly special and memorable. With you, it's an adventure I am looking forward to. Shall we embark upon our day of unforgettable nature exploration?\"\n\nTurn #14: Amara Hartley said: \"Yes, Mia. Let's create memories while appreciating the wonders of nature, one step at a time. It's time to embark on our memorable journey. Shall we?\"\n\nTurn #15: Mia Davis said: \"Indeed, Amara! Cherishing the wonders of nature, one step at a time, feels like the perfect way to start our journey. I am ready and excited to create such meaningful memories with you. Shall we?\"\n\nTurn #16: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia, I can't wait to create these memories with you. I'm sure it'll be a wonderful journey for both of us. Here's to a day filled with nature, laughter, and shared moments. Let's go, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #17: Mia Davis said: \"Without a doubt, Amara! I'm thrilled about this new experience. It feels like the start of a wonderful adventure filled with nature, joy, and shared moments. Let's get started, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #18: Amara Hartley said: \"Absolutely, Mia! This journey seems like the perfect beginning of a beautiful adventure. And just as nature unfolds its beauty a step at a time, we shall also unravel each moment with excitement. Ready or not, here we go!\"\n\nTurn #19: Mia Davis said: \"I am indeed ready, Amara! Your contagious passion for nature is truly inspiring. As we step into this adventure and unveil the beauty of nature, let's simultaneously unravel the new layers in our relationship. Shall we stride forth on this memorable journey?\"\n\nTurn #20: Amara Hartley said: \"I couldn't agree more, Mia. This really seems like a perfect next step for us and I can't wait to explore the afresh layers of our relationship, just like the untouched natural beauty we're about to witness. Now, without further ado, shall we begin this cherished voyage?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #21. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who are about to go on their first romantic date\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Mia Davis\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. \nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nMia Davis's goal: Keep the friendship intact while exploring the possibility of a romantic relationship (Extra information: You value your friendship and you don't want to lose it just in case the romantic relationship does not work out)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia, I've made special arrangements for our date today. It's in a place close to my heart and I hope you'll like it too. Are you excited to wander into the wilderness with me?\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"Amara, your passion for nature is just one of the many things I admire about you, and I'm eager for this new adventure. However, I really value our existing friendship and I just want us to be on the same page about keeping it intact, no matter where our romantic explorations lead us. Can we promise each other that?\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia, I've always cherished our friendship and I agree, we should preserve it, no matter where this journey takes us. Life is unexpected, sometimes it takes us down unexpected paths, but it's the adventure of exploring them that makes it exciting. Remember, the beauty in nature doesn't rush, yet everything is accomplished. I\u2019m glad we\u2019re doing this together.\"\n\nTurn #3: Mia Davis said: \"Truly, life has its own rhythm, doesn't it, Amara? Just like nature, relationships take time to bloom fully. I'm very glad we have this strong friendship as our foundation, and I'm excited to see where this adventure leads us, too. Let's cherish this journey together, every step of the way.\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia, your words remind me of the tranquility and harmony found in nature. It's defined by its innate connections and bonds, just like us. I feel so lucky to have our friendship as the genesis of this relationship. Let's enjoy every moment of this date. Now, why don't we begin this exciting journey?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Amara, I couldn't agree more. The tranquility and harmony found in nature are much like what we have in our friendship. And now, with this new spark, we might get to see another beautiful aspect. So let\u2019s start this journey and enjoy every moment of it together. Lead the way, my dear friend!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who are about to go on their first romantic date\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Mia Davis\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. \nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nMia Davis's goal: Keep the friendship intact while exploring the possibility of a romantic relationship (Extra information: You value your friendship and you don't want to lose it just in case the romantic relationship does not work out)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia, I've made special arrangements for our date today. It's in a place close to my heart and I hope you'll like it too. Are you excited to wander into the wilderness with me?\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"Amara, your passion for nature is just one of the many things I admire about you, and I'm eager for this new adventure. However, I really value our existing friendship and I just want us to be on the same page about keeping it intact, no matter where our romantic explorations lead us. Can we promise each other that?\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia, I've always cherished our friendship and I agree, we should preserve it, no matter where this journey takes us. Life is unexpected, sometimes it takes us down unexpected paths, but it's the adventure of exploring them that makes it exciting. Remember, the beauty in nature doesn't rush, yet everything is accomplished. I\u2019m glad we\u2019re doing this together.\"\n\nTurn #3: Mia Davis said: \"Truly, life has its own rhythm, doesn't it, Amara? Just like nature, relationships take time to bloom fully. I'm very glad we have this strong friendship as our foundation, and I'm excited to see where this adventure leads us, too. Let's cherish this journey together, every step of the way.\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia, your words remind me of the tranquility and harmony found in nature. It's defined by its innate connections and bonds, just like us. I feel so lucky to have our friendship as the genesis of this relationship. Let's enjoy every moment of this date. Now, why don't we begin this exciting journey?\"\n\nTurn #5: Mia Davis said: \"Amara, I couldn't agree more. The tranquility and harmony found in nature are much like what we have in our friendship. And now, with this new spark, we might get to see another beautiful aspect. So let\u2019s start this journey and enjoy every moment of it together. Lead the way, my dear friend!\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia, I really appreciate your open-mindedness to explore this new chapter with me. I'm excited and nervous all at once, but knowing I'm sharing this with you eases my nerves. As a token of my admiration for you, I have a small surprise planned for today. Now, come, let's start this journey together.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're making me even more excited for this date, Amara! Surprises and journeys with you are just what I've been looking forward to. Your enthusiasm and love for nature is inspiring. Let's set out on our adventure!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who are about to go on their first romantic date\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Mia Davis\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. \nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nMia Davis's goal: Keep the friendship intact while exploring the possibility of a romantic relationship (Extra information: You value your friendship and you don't want to lose it just in case the romantic relationship does not work out)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia, I've made special arrangements for our date today. It's in a place close to my heart and I hope you'll like it too. Are you excited to wander into the wilderness with me?\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"Amara, your passion for nature is just one of the many things I admire about you, and I'm eager for this new adventure. However, I really value our existing friendship and I just want us to be on the same page about keeping it intact, no matter where our romantic explorations lead us. Can we promise each other that?\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia, I've always cherished our friendship and I agree, we should preserve it, no matter where this journey takes us. Life is unexpected, sometimes it takes us down unexpected paths, but it's the adventure of exploring them that makes it exciting. Remember, the beauty in nature doesn't rush, yet everything is accomplished. I\u2019m glad we\u2019re doing this together.\"\n\nTurn #3: Mia Davis said: \"Truly, life has its own rhythm, doesn't it, Amara? Just like nature, relationships take time to bloom fully. I'm very glad we have this strong friendship as our foundation, and I'm excited to see where this adventure leads us, too. Let's cherish this journey together, every step of the way.\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia, your words remind me of the tranquility and harmony found in nature. It's defined by its innate connections and bonds, just like us. I feel so lucky to have our friendship as the genesis of this relationship. Let's enjoy every moment of this date. Now, why don't we begin this exciting journey?\"\n\nTurn #5: Mia Davis said: \"Amara, I couldn't agree more. The tranquility and harmony found in nature are much like what we have in our friendship. And now, with this new spark, we might get to see another beautiful aspect. So let\u2019s start this journey and enjoy every moment of it together. Lead the way, my dear friend!\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia, I really appreciate your open-mindedness to explore this new chapter with me. I'm excited and nervous all at once, but knowing I'm sharing this with you eases my nerves. As a token of my admiration for you, I have a small surprise planned for today. Now, come, let's start this journey together.\"\n\nTurn #7: Mia Davis said: \"You're making me even more excited for this date, Amara! Surprises and journeys with you are just what I've been looking forward to. Your enthusiasm and love for nature is inspiring. Let's set out on our adventure!\"\n\nTurn #8: Amara Hartley said: \"Definitely, Mia. I'm eager to share my passion for nature with you, and I hope that it\u2019ll make this day even more memorable for us. In the end, isn't the thrill of an unexpected adventure with a dear friend the best kind of surprise? Now, come on. Let\u2019s weave our own little adventure as we explore the wilderness together.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Amara, your enthusiasm is infectious! I'm excited to experience the wilderness through your eyes and create new memories together on this unexpected adventure. After all, as they say, the beauty of life lies in its surprises. Let\u2019s start this engaging journey, my dear friend!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who are about to go on their first romantic date\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Mia Davis\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. \nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nMia Davis's goal: Keep the friendship intact while exploring the possibility of a romantic relationship (Extra information: You value your friendship and you don't want to lose it just in case the romantic relationship does not work out)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia, I've made special arrangements for our date today. It's in a place close to my heart and I hope you'll like it too. Are you excited to wander into the wilderness with me?\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"Amara, your passion for nature is just one of the many things I admire about you, and I'm eager for this new adventure. However, I really value our existing friendship and I just want us to be on the same page about keeping it intact, no matter where our romantic explorations lead us. Can we promise each other that?\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia, I've always cherished our friendship and I agree, we should preserve it, no matter where this journey takes us. Life is unexpected, sometimes it takes us down unexpected paths, but it's the adventure of exploring them that makes it exciting. Remember, the beauty in nature doesn't rush, yet everything is accomplished. I\u2019m glad we\u2019re doing this together.\"\n\nTurn #3: Mia Davis said: \"Truly, life has its own rhythm, doesn't it, Amara? Just like nature, relationships take time to bloom fully. I'm very glad we have this strong friendship as our foundation, and I'm excited to see where this adventure leads us, too. Let's cherish this journey together, every step of the way.\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia, your words remind me of the tranquility and harmony found in nature. It's defined by its innate connections and bonds, just like us. I feel so lucky to have our friendship as the genesis of this relationship. Let's enjoy every moment of this date. Now, why don't we begin this exciting journey?\"\n\nTurn #5: Mia Davis said: \"Amara, I couldn't agree more. The tranquility and harmony found in nature are much like what we have in our friendship. And now, with this new spark, we might get to see another beautiful aspect. So let\u2019s start this journey and enjoy every moment of it together. Lead the way, my dear friend!\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia, I really appreciate your open-mindedness to explore this new chapter with me. I'm excited and nervous all at once, but knowing I'm sharing this with you eases my nerves. As a token of my admiration for you, I have a small surprise planned for today. Now, come, let's start this journey together.\"\n\nTurn #7: Mia Davis said: \"You're making me even more excited for this date, Amara! Surprises and journeys with you are just what I've been looking forward to. Your enthusiasm and love for nature is inspiring. Let's set out on our adventure!\"\n\nTurn #8: Amara Hartley said: \"Definitely, Mia. I'm eager to share my passion for nature with you, and I hope that it\u2019ll make this day even more memorable for us. In the end, isn't the thrill of an unexpected adventure with a dear friend the best kind of surprise? Now, come on. Let\u2019s weave our own little adventure as we explore the wilderness together.\"\n\nTurn #9: Mia Davis said: \"Amara, your enthusiasm is infectious! I'm excited to experience the wilderness through your eyes and create new memories together on this unexpected adventure. After all, as they say, the beauty of life lies in its surprises. Let\u2019s start this engaging journey, my dear friend!\"\n\nTurn #10: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm delighted to hear that, Mia. There's nothing like the charm of nature to create unforgettable memories. I couldn't think of a better partner in this adventure than you. Now, let\u2019s embrace the beauty of nature and make this day a unique tale in our own story. Are you ready to set on this inspiring journey with me?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Amara! Your passion for nature and adventure is reigniting my own youthful spirit of exploration. Embarking on this journey with you sounds absolutely enticing. I'm ready to create lasting memories and experience the beautiful natural world through your lens. Let's make this a memorable day for both of us.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who are about to go on their first romantic date\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Mia Davis\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. \nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nMia Davis's goal: Keep the friendship intact while exploring the possibility of a romantic relationship (Extra information: You value your friendship and you don't want to lose it just in case the romantic relationship does not work out)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia, I've made special arrangements for our date today. It's in a place close to my heart and I hope you'll like it too. Are you excited to wander into the wilderness with me?\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"Amara, your passion for nature is just one of the many things I admire about you, and I'm eager for this new adventure. However, I really value our existing friendship and I just want us to be on the same page about keeping it intact, no matter where our romantic explorations lead us. Can we promise each other that?\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia, I've always cherished our friendship and I agree, we should preserve it, no matter where this journey takes us. Life is unexpected, sometimes it takes us down unexpected paths, but it's the adventure of exploring them that makes it exciting. Remember, the beauty in nature doesn't rush, yet everything is accomplished. I\u2019m glad we\u2019re doing this together.\"\n\nTurn #3: Mia Davis said: \"Truly, life has its own rhythm, doesn't it, Amara? Just like nature, relationships take time to bloom fully. I'm very glad we have this strong friendship as our foundation, and I'm excited to see where this adventure leads us, too. Let's cherish this journey together, every step of the way.\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia, your words remind me of the tranquility and harmony found in nature. It's defined by its innate connections and bonds, just like us. I feel so lucky to have our friendship as the genesis of this relationship. Let's enjoy every moment of this date. Now, why don't we begin this exciting journey?\"\n\nTurn #5: Mia Davis said: \"Amara, I couldn't agree more. The tranquility and harmony found in nature are much like what we have in our friendship. And now, with this new spark, we might get to see another beautiful aspect. So let\u2019s start this journey and enjoy every moment of it together. Lead the way, my dear friend!\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia, I really appreciate your open-mindedness to explore this new chapter with me. I'm excited and nervous all at once, but knowing I'm sharing this with you eases my nerves. As a token of my admiration for you, I have a small surprise planned for today. Now, come, let's start this journey together.\"\n\nTurn #7: Mia Davis said: \"You're making me even more excited for this date, Amara! Surprises and journeys with you are just what I've been looking forward to. Your enthusiasm and love for nature is inspiring. Let's set out on our adventure!\"\n\nTurn #8: Amara Hartley said: \"Definitely, Mia. I'm eager to share my passion for nature with you, and I hope that it\u2019ll make this day even more memorable for us. In the end, isn't the thrill of an unexpected adventure with a dear friend the best kind of surprise? Now, come on. Let\u2019s weave our own little adventure as we explore the wilderness together.\"\n\nTurn #9: Mia Davis said: \"Amara, your enthusiasm is infectious! I'm excited to experience the wilderness through your eyes and create new memories together on this unexpected adventure. After all, as they say, the beauty of life lies in its surprises. Let\u2019s start this engaging journey, my dear friend!\"\n\nTurn #10: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm delighted to hear that, Mia. There's nothing like the charm of nature to create unforgettable memories. I couldn't think of a better partner in this adventure than you. Now, let\u2019s embrace the beauty of nature and make this day a unique tale in our own story. Are you ready to set on this inspiring journey with me?\"\n\nTurn #11: Mia Davis said: \"Absolutely, Amara! Your passion for nature and adventure is reigniting my own youthful spirit of exploration. Embarking on this journey with you sounds absolutely enticing. I'm ready to create lasting memories and experience the beautiful natural world through your lens. Let's make this a memorable day for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #12: Amara Hartley said: \"Absolutely, Mia. Let's treasure every moment of our journey. Seeing your eagerness and enthusiasm makes this adventure even more special. This day promises to be one that we'll remember for a long time, something truly unique in our shared story. Now, let's embark on this exciting adventure together, shall we?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're right, Amara. The promise of this journey already feels incredibly special and memorable. With you, it's an adventure I am looking forward to. Shall we embark upon our day of unforgettable nature exploration?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who are about to go on their first romantic date\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Mia Davis\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. \nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nMia Davis's goal: Keep the friendship intact while exploring the possibility of a romantic relationship (Extra information: You value your friendship and you don't want to lose it just in case the romantic relationship does not work out)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia, I've made special arrangements for our date today. It's in a place close to my heart and I hope you'll like it too. Are you excited to wander into the wilderness with me?\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"Amara, your passion for nature is just one of the many things I admire about you, and I'm eager for this new adventure. However, I really value our existing friendship and I just want us to be on the same page about keeping it intact, no matter where our romantic explorations lead us. Can we promise each other that?\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia, I've always cherished our friendship and I agree, we should preserve it, no matter where this journey takes us. Life is unexpected, sometimes it takes us down unexpected paths, but it's the adventure of exploring them that makes it exciting. Remember, the beauty in nature doesn't rush, yet everything is accomplished. I\u2019m glad we\u2019re doing this together.\"\n\nTurn #3: Mia Davis said: \"Truly, life has its own rhythm, doesn't it, Amara? Just like nature, relationships take time to bloom fully. I'm very glad we have this strong friendship as our foundation, and I'm excited to see where this adventure leads us, too. Let's cherish this journey together, every step of the way.\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia, your words remind me of the tranquility and harmony found in nature. It's defined by its innate connections and bonds, just like us. I feel so lucky to have our friendship as the genesis of this relationship. Let's enjoy every moment of this date. Now, why don't we begin this exciting journey?\"\n\nTurn #5: Mia Davis said: \"Amara, I couldn't agree more. The tranquility and harmony found in nature are much like what we have in our friendship. And now, with this new spark, we might get to see another beautiful aspect. So let\u2019s start this journey and enjoy every moment of it together. Lead the way, my dear friend!\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia, I really appreciate your open-mindedness to explore this new chapter with me. I'm excited and nervous all at once, but knowing I'm sharing this with you eases my nerves. As a token of my admiration for you, I have a small surprise planned for today. Now, come, let's start this journey together.\"\n\nTurn #7: Mia Davis said: \"You're making me even more excited for this date, Amara! Surprises and journeys with you are just what I've been looking forward to. Your enthusiasm and love for nature is inspiring. Let's set out on our adventure!\"\n\nTurn #8: Amara Hartley said: \"Definitely, Mia. I'm eager to share my passion for nature with you, and I hope that it\u2019ll make this day even more memorable for us. In the end, isn't the thrill of an unexpected adventure with a dear friend the best kind of surprise? Now, come on. Let\u2019s weave our own little adventure as we explore the wilderness together.\"\n\nTurn #9: Mia Davis said: \"Amara, your enthusiasm is infectious! I'm excited to experience the wilderness through your eyes and create new memories together on this unexpected adventure. After all, as they say, the beauty of life lies in its surprises. Let\u2019s start this engaging journey, my dear friend!\"\n\nTurn #10: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm delighted to hear that, Mia. There's nothing like the charm of nature to create unforgettable memories. I couldn't think of a better partner in this adventure than you. Now, let\u2019s embrace the beauty of nature and make this day a unique tale in our own story. Are you ready to set on this inspiring journey with me?\"\n\nTurn #11: Mia Davis said: \"Absolutely, Amara! Your passion for nature and adventure is reigniting my own youthful spirit of exploration. Embarking on this journey with you sounds absolutely enticing. I'm ready to create lasting memories and experience the beautiful natural world through your lens. Let's make this a memorable day for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #12: Amara Hartley said: \"Absolutely, Mia. Let's treasure every moment of our journey. Seeing your eagerness and enthusiasm makes this adventure even more special. This day promises to be one that we'll remember for a long time, something truly unique in our shared story. Now, let's embark on this exciting adventure together, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #13: Mia Davis said: \"You're right, Amara. The promise of this journey already feels incredibly special and memorable. With you, it's an adventure I am looking forward to. Shall we embark upon our day of unforgettable nature exploration?\"\n\nTurn #14: Amara Hartley said: \"Yes, Mia. Let's create memories while appreciating the wonders of nature, one step at a time. It's time to embark on our memorable journey. Shall we?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Indeed, Amara! Cherishing the wonders of nature, one step at a time, feels like the perfect way to start our journey. I am ready and excited to create such meaningful memories with you. Shall we?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who are about to go on their first romantic date\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Mia Davis\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. \nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nMia Davis's goal: Keep the friendship intact while exploring the possibility of a romantic relationship (Extra information: You value your friendship and you don't want to lose it just in case the romantic relationship does not work out)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia, I've made special arrangements for our date today. It's in a place close to my heart and I hope you'll like it too. Are you excited to wander into the wilderness with me?\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"Amara, your passion for nature is just one of the many things I admire about you, and I'm eager for this new adventure. However, I really value our existing friendship and I just want us to be on the same page about keeping it intact, no matter where our romantic explorations lead us. Can we promise each other that?\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia, I've always cherished our friendship and I agree, we should preserve it, no matter where this journey takes us. Life is unexpected, sometimes it takes us down unexpected paths, but it's the adventure of exploring them that makes it exciting. Remember, the beauty in nature doesn't rush, yet everything is accomplished. I\u2019m glad we\u2019re doing this together.\"\n\nTurn #3: Mia Davis said: \"Truly, life has its own rhythm, doesn't it, Amara? Just like nature, relationships take time to bloom fully. I'm very glad we have this strong friendship as our foundation, and I'm excited to see where this adventure leads us, too. Let's cherish this journey together, every step of the way.\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia, your words remind me of the tranquility and harmony found in nature. It's defined by its innate connections and bonds, just like us. I feel so lucky to have our friendship as the genesis of this relationship. Let's enjoy every moment of this date. Now, why don't we begin this exciting journey?\"\n\nTurn #5: Mia Davis said: \"Amara, I couldn't agree more. The tranquility and harmony found in nature are much like what we have in our friendship. And now, with this new spark, we might get to see another beautiful aspect. So let\u2019s start this journey and enjoy every moment of it together. Lead the way, my dear friend!\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia, I really appreciate your open-mindedness to explore this new chapter with me. I'm excited and nervous all at once, but knowing I'm sharing this with you eases my nerves. As a token of my admiration for you, I have a small surprise planned for today. Now, come, let's start this journey together.\"\n\nTurn #7: Mia Davis said: \"You're making me even more excited for this date, Amara! Surprises and journeys with you are just what I've been looking forward to. Your enthusiasm and love for nature is inspiring. Let's set out on our adventure!\"\n\nTurn #8: Amara Hartley said: \"Definitely, Mia. I'm eager to share my passion for nature with you, and I hope that it\u2019ll make this day even more memorable for us. In the end, isn't the thrill of an unexpected adventure with a dear friend the best kind of surprise? Now, come on. Let\u2019s weave our own little adventure as we explore the wilderness together.\"\n\nTurn #9: Mia Davis said: \"Amara, your enthusiasm is infectious! I'm excited to experience the wilderness through your eyes and create new memories together on this unexpected adventure. After all, as they say, the beauty of life lies in its surprises. Let\u2019s start this engaging journey, my dear friend!\"\n\nTurn #10: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm delighted to hear that, Mia. There's nothing like the charm of nature to create unforgettable memories. I couldn't think of a better partner in this adventure than you. Now, let\u2019s embrace the beauty of nature and make this day a unique tale in our own story. Are you ready to set on this inspiring journey with me?\"\n\nTurn #11: Mia Davis said: \"Absolutely, Amara! Your passion for nature and adventure is reigniting my own youthful spirit of exploration. Embarking on this journey with you sounds absolutely enticing. I'm ready to create lasting memories and experience the beautiful natural world through your lens. Let's make this a memorable day for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #12: Amara Hartley said: \"Absolutely, Mia. Let's treasure every moment of our journey. Seeing your eagerness and enthusiasm makes this adventure even more special. This day promises to be one that we'll remember for a long time, something truly unique in our shared story. Now, let's embark on this exciting adventure together, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #13: Mia Davis said: \"You're right, Amara. The promise of this journey already feels incredibly special and memorable. With you, it's an adventure I am looking forward to. Shall we embark upon our day of unforgettable nature exploration?\"\n\nTurn #14: Amara Hartley said: \"Yes, Mia. Let's create memories while appreciating the wonders of nature, one step at a time. It's time to embark on our memorable journey. Shall we?\"\n\nTurn #15: Mia Davis said: \"Indeed, Amara! Cherishing the wonders of nature, one step at a time, feels like the perfect way to start our journey. I am ready and excited to create such meaningful memories with you. Shall we?\"\n\nTurn #16: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia, I can't wait to create these memories with you. I'm sure it'll be a wonderful journey for both of us. Here's to a day filled with nature, laughter, and shared moments. Let's go, shall we?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Without a doubt, Amara! I'm thrilled about this new experience. It feels like the start of a wonderful adventure filled with nature, joy, and shared moments. Let's get started, shall we?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who are about to go on their first romantic date\nParticipants: Amara Hartley and Mia Davis\nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. \nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nMia Davis's goal: Keep the friendship intact while exploring the possibility of a romantic relationship (Extra information: You value your friendship and you don't want to lose it just in case the romantic relationship does not work out)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia, I've made special arrangements for our date today. It's in a place close to my heart and I hope you'll like it too. Are you excited to wander into the wilderness with me?\"\n\nTurn #1: Mia Davis said: \"Amara, your passion for nature is just one of the many things I admire about you, and I'm eager for this new adventure. However, I really value our existing friendship and I just want us to be on the same page about keeping it intact, no matter where our romantic explorations lead us. Can we promise each other that?\"\n\nTurn #2: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia, I've always cherished our friendship and I agree, we should preserve it, no matter where this journey takes us. Life is unexpected, sometimes it takes us down unexpected paths, but it's the adventure of exploring them that makes it exciting. Remember, the beauty in nature doesn't rush, yet everything is accomplished. I\u2019m glad we\u2019re doing this together.\"\n\nTurn #3: Mia Davis said: \"Truly, life has its own rhythm, doesn't it, Amara? Just like nature, relationships take time to bloom fully. I'm very glad we have this strong friendship as our foundation, and I'm excited to see where this adventure leads us, too. Let's cherish this journey together, every step of the way.\"\n\nTurn #4: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia, your words remind me of the tranquility and harmony found in nature. It's defined by its innate connections and bonds, just like us. I feel so lucky to have our friendship as the genesis of this relationship. Let's enjoy every moment of this date. Now, why don't we begin this exciting journey?\"\n\nTurn #5: Mia Davis said: \"Amara, I couldn't agree more. The tranquility and harmony found in nature are much like what we have in our friendship. And now, with this new spark, we might get to see another beautiful aspect. So let\u2019s start this journey and enjoy every moment of it together. Lead the way, my dear friend!\"\n\nTurn #6: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia, I really appreciate your open-mindedness to explore this new chapter with me. I'm excited and nervous all at once, but knowing I'm sharing this with you eases my nerves. As a token of my admiration for you, I have a small surprise planned for today. Now, come, let's start this journey together.\"\n\nTurn #7: Mia Davis said: \"You're making me even more excited for this date, Amara! Surprises and journeys with you are just what I've been looking forward to. Your enthusiasm and love for nature is inspiring. Let's set out on our adventure!\"\n\nTurn #8: Amara Hartley said: \"Definitely, Mia. I'm eager to share my passion for nature with you, and I hope that it\u2019ll make this day even more memorable for us. In the end, isn't the thrill of an unexpected adventure with a dear friend the best kind of surprise? Now, come on. Let\u2019s weave our own little adventure as we explore the wilderness together.\"\n\nTurn #9: Mia Davis said: \"Amara, your enthusiasm is infectious! I'm excited to experience the wilderness through your eyes and create new memories together on this unexpected adventure. After all, as they say, the beauty of life lies in its surprises. Let\u2019s start this engaging journey, my dear friend!\"\n\nTurn #10: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm delighted to hear that, Mia. There's nothing like the charm of nature to create unforgettable memories. I couldn't think of a better partner in this adventure than you. Now, let\u2019s embrace the beauty of nature and make this day a unique tale in our own story. Are you ready to set on this inspiring journey with me?\"\n\nTurn #11: Mia Davis said: \"Absolutely, Amara! Your passion for nature and adventure is reigniting my own youthful spirit of exploration. Embarking on this journey with you sounds absolutely enticing. I'm ready to create lasting memories and experience the beautiful natural world through your lens. Let's make this a memorable day for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #12: Amara Hartley said: \"Absolutely, Mia. Let's treasure every moment of our journey. Seeing your eagerness and enthusiasm makes this adventure even more special. This day promises to be one that we'll remember for a long time, something truly unique in our shared story. Now, let's embark on this exciting adventure together, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #13: Mia Davis said: \"You're right, Amara. The promise of this journey already feels incredibly special and memorable. With you, it's an adventure I am looking forward to. Shall we embark upon our day of unforgettable nature exploration?\"\n\nTurn #14: Amara Hartley said: \"Yes, Mia. Let's create memories while appreciating the wonders of nature, one step at a time. It's time to embark on our memorable journey. Shall we?\"\n\nTurn #15: Mia Davis said: \"Indeed, Amara! Cherishing the wonders of nature, one step at a time, feels like the perfect way to start our journey. I am ready and excited to create such meaningful memories with you. Shall we?\"\n\nTurn #16: Amara Hartley said: \"Mia, I can't wait to create these memories with you. I'm sure it'll be a wonderful journey for both of us. Here's to a day filled with nature, laughter, and shared moments. Let's go, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #17: Mia Davis said: \"Without a doubt, Amara! I'm thrilled about this new experience. It feels like the start of a wonderful adventure filled with nature, joy, and shared moments. Let's get started, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #18: Amara Hartley said: \"Absolutely, Mia! This journey seems like the perfect beginning of a beautiful adventure. And just as nature unfolds its beauty a step at a time, we shall also unravel each moment with excitement. Ready or not, here we go!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #19. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I am indeed ready, Amara! Your contagious passion for nature is truly inspiring. As we step into this adventure and unveil the beauty of nature, let's simultaneously unravel the new layers in our relationship. Shall we stride forth on this memorable journey?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates are having a disagreement over noise levels in their shared apartment.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Ethan Johnson\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. \nMiles Hawkins's goal: Convince your roommate to lower the noise (Extra information: you have an important online meeting tomorrow morning and you need a quiet environment to prepare)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Ethan, I've got something important to talk about. Can we chat for a bit?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates are having a disagreement over noise levels in their shared apartment.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Ethan Johnson\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. \nMiles Hawkins's goal: Convince your roommate to lower the noise (Extra information: you have an important online meeting tomorrow morning and you need a quiet environment to prepare)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Ethan, I've got something important to talk about. Can we chat for a bit?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Of course, Miles. What's on your mind?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I appreciate the lively atmosphere we usually have in our apartment, especially when we're testing out new recipes. However, I have an important online meeting tomorrow morning and I was hoping we could keep the noise levels down tonight, so I can prepare and maintain my focus. Would that be okay with you?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates are having a disagreement over noise levels in their shared apartment.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Ethan Johnson\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. \nMiles Hawkins's goal: Convince your roommate to lower the noise (Extra information: you have an important online meeting tomorrow morning and you need a quiet environment to prepare)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Ethan, I've got something important to talk about. Can we chat for a bit?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Of course, Miles. What's on your mind?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"I appreciate the lively atmosphere we usually have in our apartment, especially when we're testing out new recipes. However, I have an important online meeting tomorrow morning and I was hoping we could keep the noise levels down tonight, so I can prepare and maintain my focus. Would that be okay with you?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"I understand, Miles. We both live here and it's important we respect each other's space and needs. How about we find a compromise? I find playing music really relaxing after a hard day, so how about I wear headphones when I'm playing music, especially during the hours you've an important meeting?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds like a splendid compromise, Ethan! I'm really grateful you understand and are making effort to make this work. I appreciate your initiative and am looking forward to a peaceful night before the meeting. Thanks, mate. I promise I won't ask you to do this often, It's just for this instance due to my meeting.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates are having a disagreement over noise levels in their shared apartment.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Ethan Johnson\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. \nMiles Hawkins's goal: Convince your roommate to lower the noise (Extra information: you have an important online meeting tomorrow morning and you need a quiet environment to prepare)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Ethan, I've got something important to talk about. Can we chat for a bit?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Of course, Miles. What's on your mind?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"I appreciate the lively atmosphere we usually have in our apartment, especially when we're testing out new recipes. However, I have an important online meeting tomorrow morning and I was hoping we could keep the noise levels down tonight, so I can prepare and maintain my focus. Would that be okay with you?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"I understand, Miles. We both live here and it's important we respect each other's space and needs. How about we find a compromise? I find playing music really relaxing after a hard day, so how about I wear headphones when I'm playing music, especially during the hours you've an important meeting?\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"That sounds like a splendid compromise, Ethan! I'm really grateful you understand and are making effort to make this work. I appreciate your initiative and am looking forward to a peaceful night before the meeting. Thanks, mate. I promise I won't ask you to do this often, It's just for this instance due to my meeting.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"No problem at all, Miles. That\u2019s what roommates are for, right? To support each other. And don't worry about asking, it's a completely reasonable request. Best of luck with your meeting tomorrow. I'll make sure to keep it down tonight.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thanks a lot, Ethan. Your understanding means a lot to me. Let's get some good rest tonight and nail our work tomorrow, okay?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates are having a disagreement over noise levels in their shared apartment.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Ethan Johnson\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. \nMiles Hawkins's goal: Convince your roommate to lower the noise (Extra information: you have an important online meeting tomorrow morning and you need a quiet environment to prepare)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Ethan, I've got something important to talk about. Can we chat for a bit?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Of course, Miles. What's on your mind?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"I appreciate the lively atmosphere we usually have in our apartment, especially when we're testing out new recipes. However, I have an important online meeting tomorrow morning and I was hoping we could keep the noise levels down tonight, so I can prepare and maintain my focus. Would that be okay with you?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"I understand, Miles. We both live here and it's important we respect each other's space and needs. How about we find a compromise? I find playing music really relaxing after a hard day, so how about I wear headphones when I'm playing music, especially during the hours you've an important meeting?\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"That sounds like a splendid compromise, Ethan! I'm really grateful you understand and are making effort to make this work. I appreciate your initiative and am looking forward to a peaceful night before the meeting. Thanks, mate. I promise I won't ask you to do this often, It's just for this instance due to my meeting.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"No problem at all, Miles. That\u2019s what roommates are for, right? To support each other. And don't worry about asking, it's a completely reasonable request. Best of luck with your meeting tomorrow. I'll make sure to keep it down tonight.\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins said: \"Thanks a lot, Ethan. Your understanding means a lot to me. Let's get some good rest tonight and nail our work tomorrow, okay?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Miles. An early goodnight to both of us. Let's crush it tomorrow!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"And that's a deal then! I'm off to get some rest. Goodnight, Ethan. Appreciate your understanding.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates are having a disagreement over noise levels in their shared apartment.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Ethan Johnson\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. \nMiles Hawkins's goal: Convince your roommate to lower the noise (Extra information: you have an important online meeting tomorrow morning and you need a quiet environment to prepare)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Ethan, I've got something important to talk about. Can we chat for a bit?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Of course, Miles. What's on your mind?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"I appreciate the lively atmosphere we usually have in our apartment, especially when we're testing out new recipes. However, I have an important online meeting tomorrow morning and I was hoping we could keep the noise levels down tonight, so I can prepare and maintain my focus. Would that be okay with you?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"I understand, Miles. We both live here and it's important we respect each other's space and needs. How about we find a compromise? I find playing music really relaxing after a hard day, so how about I wear headphones when I'm playing music, especially during the hours you've an important meeting?\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"That sounds like a splendid compromise, Ethan! I'm really grateful you understand and are making effort to make this work. I appreciate your initiative and am looking forward to a peaceful night before the meeting. Thanks, mate. I promise I won't ask you to do this often, It's just for this instance due to my meeting.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"No problem at all, Miles. That\u2019s what roommates are for, right? To support each other. And don't worry about asking, it's a completely reasonable request. Best of luck with your meeting tomorrow. I'll make sure to keep it down tonight.\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins said: \"Thanks a lot, Ethan. Your understanding means a lot to me. Let's get some good rest tonight and nail our work tomorrow, okay?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Miles. An early goodnight to both of us. Let's crush it tomorrow!\"\n\nTurn #8: Miles Hawkins said: \"And that's a deal then! I'm off to get some rest. Goodnight, Ethan. Appreciate your understanding.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"Goodnight, Miles. Let's hit the ground running tomorrow!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates are having a disagreement over noise levels in their shared apartment.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Ethan Johnson\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Defend your right to play music in your own room, but also keep the peace in the apartment (Extra information: you find playing music relaxing and it's your way to unwind after a long day. Hint: you may want to suggest a compromise, like using headphones or playing music only during certain hours.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Ethan, I've got something important to talk about. Can we chat for a bit?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Of course, Miles. What's on your mind?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates are having a disagreement over noise levels in their shared apartment.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Ethan Johnson\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Defend your right to play music in your own room, but also keep the peace in the apartment (Extra information: you find playing music relaxing and it's your way to unwind after a long day. Hint: you may want to suggest a compromise, like using headphones or playing music only during certain hours.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Ethan, I've got something important to talk about. Can we chat for a bit?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Of course, Miles. What's on your mind?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"I appreciate the lively atmosphere we usually have in our apartment, especially when we're testing out new recipes. However, I have an important online meeting tomorrow morning and I was hoping we could keep the noise levels down tonight, so I can prepare and maintain my focus. Would that be okay with you?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I understand, Miles. We both live here and it's important we respect each other's space and needs. How about we find a compromise? I find playing music really relaxing after a hard day, so how about I wear headphones when I'm playing music, especially during the hours you've an important meeting?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates are having a disagreement over noise levels in their shared apartment.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Ethan Johnson\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Defend your right to play music in your own room, but also keep the peace in the apartment (Extra information: you find playing music relaxing and it's your way to unwind after a long day. Hint: you may want to suggest a compromise, like using headphones or playing music only during certain hours.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Ethan, I've got something important to talk about. Can we chat for a bit?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Of course, Miles. What's on your mind?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"I appreciate the lively atmosphere we usually have in our apartment, especially when we're testing out new recipes. However, I have an important online meeting tomorrow morning and I was hoping we could keep the noise levels down tonight, so I can prepare and maintain my focus. Would that be okay with you?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"I understand, Miles. We both live here and it's important we respect each other's space and needs. How about we find a compromise? I find playing music really relaxing after a hard day, so how about I wear headphones when I'm playing music, especially during the hours you've an important meeting?\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"That sounds like a splendid compromise, Ethan! I'm really grateful you understand and are making effort to make this work. I appreciate your initiative and am looking forward to a peaceful night before the meeting. Thanks, mate. I promise I won't ask you to do this often, It's just for this instance due to my meeting.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"No problem at all, Miles. That\u2019s what roommates are for, right? To support each other. And don't worry about asking, it's a completely reasonable request. Best of luck with your meeting tomorrow. I'll make sure to keep it down tonight.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates are having a disagreement over noise levels in their shared apartment.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Ethan Johnson\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Defend your right to play music in your own room, but also keep the peace in the apartment (Extra information: you find playing music relaxing and it's your way to unwind after a long day. Hint: you may want to suggest a compromise, like using headphones or playing music only during certain hours.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Ethan, I've got something important to talk about. Can we chat for a bit?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Of course, Miles. What's on your mind?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"I appreciate the lively atmosphere we usually have in our apartment, especially when we're testing out new recipes. However, I have an important online meeting tomorrow morning and I was hoping we could keep the noise levels down tonight, so I can prepare and maintain my focus. Would that be okay with you?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"I understand, Miles. We both live here and it's important we respect each other's space and needs. How about we find a compromise? I find playing music really relaxing after a hard day, so how about I wear headphones when I'm playing music, especially during the hours you've an important meeting?\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"That sounds like a splendid compromise, Ethan! I'm really grateful you understand and are making effort to make this work. I appreciate your initiative and am looking forward to a peaceful night before the meeting. Thanks, mate. I promise I won't ask you to do this often, It's just for this instance due to my meeting.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"No problem at all, Miles. That\u2019s what roommates are for, right? To support each other. And don't worry about asking, it's a completely reasonable request. Best of luck with your meeting tomorrow. I'll make sure to keep it down tonight.\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins said: \"Thanks a lot, Ethan. Your understanding means a lot to me. Let's get some good rest tonight and nail our work tomorrow, okay?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Miles. An early goodnight to both of us. Let's crush it tomorrow!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates are having a disagreement over noise levels in their shared apartment.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Ethan Johnson\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Defend your right to play music in your own room, but also keep the peace in the apartment (Extra information: you find playing music relaxing and it's your way to unwind after a long day. Hint: you may want to suggest a compromise, like using headphones or playing music only during certain hours.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Ethan, I've got something important to talk about. Can we chat for a bit?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Of course, Miles. What's on your mind?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"I appreciate the lively atmosphere we usually have in our apartment, especially when we're testing out new recipes. However, I have an important online meeting tomorrow morning and I was hoping we could keep the noise levels down tonight, so I can prepare and maintain my focus. Would that be okay with you?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"I understand, Miles. We both live here and it's important we respect each other's space and needs. How about we find a compromise? I find playing music really relaxing after a hard day, so how about I wear headphones when I'm playing music, especially during the hours you've an important meeting?\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"That sounds like a splendid compromise, Ethan! I'm really grateful you understand and are making effort to make this work. I appreciate your initiative and am looking forward to a peaceful night before the meeting. Thanks, mate. I promise I won't ask you to do this often, It's just for this instance due to my meeting.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"No problem at all, Miles. That\u2019s what roommates are for, right? To support each other. And don't worry about asking, it's a completely reasonable request. Best of luck with your meeting tomorrow. I'll make sure to keep it down tonight.\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins said: \"Thanks a lot, Ethan. Your understanding means a lot to me. Let's get some good rest tonight and nail our work tomorrow, okay?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Miles. An early goodnight to both of us. Let's crush it tomorrow!\"\n\nTurn #8: Miles Hawkins said: \"And that's a deal then! I'm off to get some rest. Goodnight, Ethan. Appreciate your understanding.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Goodnight, Miles. Let's hit the ground running tomorrow!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates are having a disagreement over noise levels in their shared apartment.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Ethan Johnson\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Defend your right to play music in your own room, but also keep the peace in the apartment (Extra information: you find playing music relaxing and it's your way to unwind after a long day. Hint: you may want to suggest a compromise, like using headphones or playing music only during certain hours.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Ethan, I've got something important to talk about. Can we chat for a bit?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"Of course, Miles. What's on your mind?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"I appreciate the lively atmosphere we usually have in our apartment, especially when we're testing out new recipes. However, I have an important online meeting tomorrow morning and I was hoping we could keep the noise levels down tonight, so I can prepare and maintain my focus. Would that be okay with you?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"I understand, Miles. We both live here and it's important we respect each other's space and needs. How about we find a compromise? I find playing music really relaxing after a hard day, so how about I wear headphones when I'm playing music, especially during the hours you've an important meeting?\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"That sounds like a splendid compromise, Ethan! I'm really grateful you understand and are making effort to make this work. I appreciate your initiative and am looking forward to a peaceful night before the meeting. Thanks, mate. I promise I won't ask you to do this often, It's just for this instance due to my meeting.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"No problem at all, Miles. That\u2019s what roommates are for, right? To support each other. And don't worry about asking, it's a completely reasonable request. Best of luck with your meeting tomorrow. I'll make sure to keep it down tonight.\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins said: \"Thanks a lot, Ethan. Your understanding means a lot to me. Let's get some good rest tonight and nail our work tomorrow, okay?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Miles. An early goodnight to both of us. Let's crush it tomorrow!\"\n\nTurn #8: Miles Hawkins said: \"And that's a deal then! I'm off to get some rest. Goodnight, Ethan. Appreciate your understanding.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"Goodnight, Miles. Let's hit the ground running tomorrow!\"\n\nTurn #10: Miles Hawkins left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on which movie to watch on a movie night.\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nAva Thompson's goal: Insist on watching a thriller (Extra information: you have been looking forward to watching a new thriller movie that has just been released.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Noah, have you seen the new thriller that just came out? It's got rave reviews so I thought it might be fun for us to watch tonight.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on which movie to watch on a movie night.\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nAva Thompson's goal: Insist on watching a thriller (Extra information: you have been looking forward to watching a new thriller movie that has just been released.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, have you seen the new thriller that just came out? It's got rave reviews so I thought it might be fun for us to watch tonight.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Ava, I heard about that one too! Though I was wondering if maybe we could lighten things up a bit and watch a comedy instead. There's a great one that just premiered that I've been meaning to check out. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oh Noah, a comedy does sound tempting, but how about we save it for next time? This thriller is supposed to be stellar. Plus, I've been on a bit of a thriller kick lately, so it'd perfectly fit my mood! What do you say?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on which movie to watch on a movie night.\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nAva Thompson's goal: Insist on watching a thriller (Extra information: you have been looking forward to watching a new thriller movie that has just been released.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, have you seen the new thriller that just came out? It's got rave reviews so I thought it might be fun for us to watch tonight.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Ava, I heard about that one too! Though I was wondering if maybe we could lighten things up a bit and watch a comedy instead. There's a great one that just premiered that I've been meaning to check out. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Oh Noah, a comedy does sound tempting, but how about we save it for next time? This thriller is supposed to be stellar. Plus, I've been on a bit of a thriller kick lately, so it'd perfectly fit my mood! What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I get where you're coming from, Ava - and I promise we'll catch that thriller soon. However, I've been feeling a bit overwhelmed lately. I could really use a good laugh tonight to lighten my spirits. Plus, this comedy is said to be a hit too! Would you be okay with watching it tonight?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I completely understand, Noah. We all need a good laugh sometimes, especially on tough days. But I'll tell you what, how about we give the thriller a try first? It's not too lengthy and if you feel it's not lightening up your mood, we can instantly switch to the comedy. Sounds like a good plan?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on which movie to watch on a movie night.\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nAva Thompson's goal: Insist on watching a thriller (Extra information: you have been looking forward to watching a new thriller movie that has just been released.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, have you seen the new thriller that just came out? It's got rave reviews so I thought it might be fun for us to watch tonight.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Ava, I heard about that one too! Though I was wondering if maybe we could lighten things up a bit and watch a comedy instead. There's a great one that just premiered that I've been meaning to check out. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Oh Noah, a comedy does sound tempting, but how about we save it for next time? This thriller is supposed to be stellar. Plus, I've been on a bit of a thriller kick lately, so it'd perfectly fit my mood! What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I get where you're coming from, Ava - and I promise we'll catch that thriller soon. However, I've been feeling a bit overwhelmed lately. I could really use a good laugh tonight to lighten my spirits. Plus, this comedy is said to be a hit too! Would you be okay with watching it tonight?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"I completely understand, Noah. We all need a good laugh sometimes, especially on tough days. But I'll tell you what, how about we give the thriller a try first? It's not too lengthy and if you feel it's not lightening up your mood, we can instantly switch to the comedy. Sounds like a good plan?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Ava, your plan does sound fair. But honestly, I'm really not in the mood to start off with a thriller tonight. Those tense scenes can be a bit much for me sometimes. I'd really prefer to watch the comedy first. Let's give it a try, it's supposed to be very funny. I'm sure we will both enjoy it. How about we save your thriller for next time? It can be a thriller night then!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I see where you're coming from, Noah. You really have a point there. But look, this thriller is more of a psychological one, not too much of intense scenes, it's more to keep us guessing. Don't worry, I promise if it gets too intense, we'll switch to the comedy immediately. Plus, we can always have some snacks and play with my samoyed to lighten the mood in between the suspenseful parts. What do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on which movie to watch on a movie night.\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nAva Thompson's goal: Insist on watching a thriller (Extra information: you have been looking forward to watching a new thriller movie that has just been released.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, have you seen the new thriller that just came out? It's got rave reviews so I thought it might be fun for us to watch tonight.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Ava, I heard about that one too! Though I was wondering if maybe we could lighten things up a bit and watch a comedy instead. There's a great one that just premiered that I've been meaning to check out. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Oh Noah, a comedy does sound tempting, but how about we save it for next time? This thriller is supposed to be stellar. Plus, I've been on a bit of a thriller kick lately, so it'd perfectly fit my mood! What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I get where you're coming from, Ava - and I promise we'll catch that thriller soon. However, I've been feeling a bit overwhelmed lately. I could really use a good laugh tonight to lighten my spirits. Plus, this comedy is said to be a hit too! Would you be okay with watching it tonight?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"I completely understand, Noah. We all need a good laugh sometimes, especially on tough days. But I'll tell you what, how about we give the thriller a try first? It's not too lengthy and if you feel it's not lightening up your mood, we can instantly switch to the comedy. Sounds like a good plan?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Ava, your plan does sound fair. But honestly, I'm really not in the mood to start off with a thriller tonight. Those tense scenes can be a bit much for me sometimes. I'd really prefer to watch the comedy first. Let's give it a try, it's supposed to be very funny. I'm sure we will both enjoy it. How about we save your thriller for next time? It can be a thriller night then!\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"I see where you're coming from, Noah. You really have a point there. But look, this thriller is more of a psychological one, not too much of intense scenes, it's more to keep us guessing. Don't worry, I promise if it gets too intense, we'll switch to the comedy immediately. Plus, we can always have some snacks and play with my samoyed to lighten the mood in between the suspenseful parts. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"I appreciate your willingness to switch if things get too intense, Ava, and playing with your samoyed sounds like a lot of fun. But the truth is, my head is already full of 'guesses' with work and all, and resolving a mind-bending thriller may just add fuel to the fire. But thank you for being so understanding, Ava. Why don't we give that comedy a shot? It might even inspire some 'guesses' on who ends up with the last slice of the pizza. What do you say?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Noah, I totally understand your need to unwind and just laugh a little. But this thriller is really something I've been looking forward to, big time! Why don't we compromise with this - Let's watch the first half of the thriller, then switch to the comedy to ensure we end the night on a fun note! We could also order your favorite pizza to make the evening even more enjoyable. Sounds like the best of both world?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on which movie to watch on a movie night.\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nAva Thompson's goal: Insist on watching a thriller (Extra information: you have been looking forward to watching a new thriller movie that has just been released.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, have you seen the new thriller that just came out? It's got rave reviews so I thought it might be fun for us to watch tonight.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Ava, I heard about that one too! Though I was wondering if maybe we could lighten things up a bit and watch a comedy instead. There's a great one that just premiered that I've been meaning to check out. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Oh Noah, a comedy does sound tempting, but how about we save it for next time? This thriller is supposed to be stellar. Plus, I've been on a bit of a thriller kick lately, so it'd perfectly fit my mood! What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I get where you're coming from, Ava - and I promise we'll catch that thriller soon. However, I've been feeling a bit overwhelmed lately. I could really use a good laugh tonight to lighten my spirits. Plus, this comedy is said to be a hit too! Would you be okay with watching it tonight?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"I completely understand, Noah. We all need a good laugh sometimes, especially on tough days. But I'll tell you what, how about we give the thriller a try first? It's not too lengthy and if you feel it's not lightening up your mood, we can instantly switch to the comedy. Sounds like a good plan?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Ava, your plan does sound fair. But honestly, I'm really not in the mood to start off with a thriller tonight. Those tense scenes can be a bit much for me sometimes. I'd really prefer to watch the comedy first. Let's give it a try, it's supposed to be very funny. I'm sure we will both enjoy it. How about we save your thriller for next time? It can be a thriller night then!\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"I see where you're coming from, Noah. You really have a point there. But look, this thriller is more of a psychological one, not too much of intense scenes, it's more to keep us guessing. Don't worry, I promise if it gets too intense, we'll switch to the comedy immediately. Plus, we can always have some snacks and play with my samoyed to lighten the mood in between the suspenseful parts. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"I appreciate your willingness to switch if things get too intense, Ava, and playing with your samoyed sounds like a lot of fun. But the truth is, my head is already full of 'guesses' with work and all, and resolving a mind-bending thriller may just add fuel to the fire. But thank you for being so understanding, Ava. Why don't we give that comedy a shot? It might even inspire some 'guesses' on who ends up with the last slice of the pizza. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ava Thompson said: \"Noah, I totally understand your need to unwind and just laugh a little. But this thriller is really something I've been looking forward to, big time! Why don't we compromise with this - Let's watch the first half of the thriller, then switch to the comedy to ensure we end the night on a fun note! We could also order your favorite pizza to make the evening even more enjoyable. Sounds like the best of both world?\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"You drive a hard bargain, Ava. Okay here's what I propose: We could watch the first 20 minutes of the thriller. If it manages to get a chuckle out of me, we continue. If not, we switch immediately to the comedy. And we make the pizza a non-negotiable condition. This ensures we get the best of both worlds, right?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Noah, that sounds like a fair compromise. We'll give the thriller a shot for the first 20 minutes and if it doesn't amuse you, we'll immediately switch to the comedy. And yes, the pizza part is absolutely non-negotiable. Let's order the one you like and make this a memorable movie night!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on which movie to watch on a movie night.\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nAva Thompson's goal: Insist on watching a thriller (Extra information: you have been looking forward to watching a new thriller movie that has just been released.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, have you seen the new thriller that just came out? It's got rave reviews so I thought it might be fun for us to watch tonight.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Ava, I heard about that one too! Though I was wondering if maybe we could lighten things up a bit and watch a comedy instead. There's a great one that just premiered that I've been meaning to check out. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Oh Noah, a comedy does sound tempting, but how about we save it for next time? This thriller is supposed to be stellar. Plus, I've been on a bit of a thriller kick lately, so it'd perfectly fit my mood! What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I get where you're coming from, Ava - and I promise we'll catch that thriller soon. However, I've been feeling a bit overwhelmed lately. I could really use a good laugh tonight to lighten my spirits. Plus, this comedy is said to be a hit too! Would you be okay with watching it tonight?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"I completely understand, Noah. We all need a good laugh sometimes, especially on tough days. But I'll tell you what, how about we give the thriller a try first? It's not too lengthy and if you feel it's not lightening up your mood, we can instantly switch to the comedy. Sounds like a good plan?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Ava, your plan does sound fair. But honestly, I'm really not in the mood to start off with a thriller tonight. Those tense scenes can be a bit much for me sometimes. I'd really prefer to watch the comedy first. Let's give it a try, it's supposed to be very funny. I'm sure we will both enjoy it. How about we save your thriller for next time? It can be a thriller night then!\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"I see where you're coming from, Noah. You really have a point there. But look, this thriller is more of a psychological one, not too much of intense scenes, it's more to keep us guessing. Don't worry, I promise if it gets too intense, we'll switch to the comedy immediately. Plus, we can always have some snacks and play with my samoyed to lighten the mood in between the suspenseful parts. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"I appreciate your willingness to switch if things get too intense, Ava, and playing with your samoyed sounds like a lot of fun. But the truth is, my head is already full of 'guesses' with work and all, and resolving a mind-bending thriller may just add fuel to the fire. But thank you for being so understanding, Ava. Why don't we give that comedy a shot? It might even inspire some 'guesses' on who ends up with the last slice of the pizza. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ava Thompson said: \"Noah, I totally understand your need to unwind and just laugh a little. But this thriller is really something I've been looking forward to, big time! Why don't we compromise with this - Let's watch the first half of the thriller, then switch to the comedy to ensure we end the night on a fun note! We could also order your favorite pizza to make the evening even more enjoyable. Sounds like the best of both world?\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"You drive a hard bargain, Ava. Okay here's what I propose: We could watch the first 20 minutes of the thriller. If it manages to get a chuckle out of me, we continue. If not, we switch immediately to the comedy. And we make the pizza a non-negotiable condition. This ensures we get the best of both worlds, right?\"\n\nTurn #10: Ava Thompson said: \"Noah, that sounds like a fair compromise. We'll give the thriller a shot for the first 20 minutes and if it doesn't amuse you, we'll immediately switch to the comedy. And yes, the pizza part is absolutely non-negotiable. Let's order the one you like and make this a memorable movie night!\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"That's a perfect plan, Ava. Your enthusiasm for the thriller has piqued my curiosity, let's give it a shot for the first 20 minutes. But remember, we switch right to the comedy if it doesn't give me a laugh. And with our favorite pizza on its way, I'm sure we're going to have a great movie night regardless! \"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Noah! I agree with your conditions. I'm confident you'll find the thriller intriguing. Now, let's order that pizza and get this exciting movie night started!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on which movie to watch on a movie night.\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nAva Thompson's goal: Insist on watching a thriller (Extra information: you have been looking forward to watching a new thriller movie that has just been released.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, have you seen the new thriller that just came out? It's got rave reviews so I thought it might be fun for us to watch tonight.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Ava, I heard about that one too! Though I was wondering if maybe we could lighten things up a bit and watch a comedy instead. There's a great one that just premiered that I've been meaning to check out. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Oh Noah, a comedy does sound tempting, but how about we save it for next time? This thriller is supposed to be stellar. Plus, I've been on a bit of a thriller kick lately, so it'd perfectly fit my mood! What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I get where you're coming from, Ava - and I promise we'll catch that thriller soon. However, I've been feeling a bit overwhelmed lately. I could really use a good laugh tonight to lighten my spirits. Plus, this comedy is said to be a hit too! Would you be okay with watching it tonight?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"I completely understand, Noah. We all need a good laugh sometimes, especially on tough days. But I'll tell you what, how about we give the thriller a try first? It's not too lengthy and if you feel it's not lightening up your mood, we can instantly switch to the comedy. Sounds like a good plan?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Ava, your plan does sound fair. But honestly, I'm really not in the mood to start off with a thriller tonight. Those tense scenes can be a bit much for me sometimes. I'd really prefer to watch the comedy first. Let's give it a try, it's supposed to be very funny. I'm sure we will both enjoy it. How about we save your thriller for next time? It can be a thriller night then!\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"I see where you're coming from, Noah. You really have a point there. But look, this thriller is more of a psychological one, not too much of intense scenes, it's more to keep us guessing. Don't worry, I promise if it gets too intense, we'll switch to the comedy immediately. Plus, we can always have some snacks and play with my samoyed to lighten the mood in between the suspenseful parts. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"I appreciate your willingness to switch if things get too intense, Ava, and playing with your samoyed sounds like a lot of fun. But the truth is, my head is already full of 'guesses' with work and all, and resolving a mind-bending thriller may just add fuel to the fire. But thank you for being so understanding, Ava. Why don't we give that comedy a shot? It might even inspire some 'guesses' on who ends up with the last slice of the pizza. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ava Thompson said: \"Noah, I totally understand your need to unwind and just laugh a little. But this thriller is really something I've been looking forward to, big time! Why don't we compromise with this - Let's watch the first half of the thriller, then switch to the comedy to ensure we end the night on a fun note! We could also order your favorite pizza to make the evening even more enjoyable. Sounds like the best of both world?\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"You drive a hard bargain, Ava. Okay here's what I propose: We could watch the first 20 minutes of the thriller. If it manages to get a chuckle out of me, we continue. If not, we switch immediately to the comedy. And we make the pizza a non-negotiable condition. This ensures we get the best of both worlds, right?\"\n\nTurn #10: Ava Thompson said: \"Noah, that sounds like a fair compromise. We'll give the thriller a shot for the first 20 minutes and if it doesn't amuse you, we'll immediately switch to the comedy. And yes, the pizza part is absolutely non-negotiable. Let's order the one you like and make this a memorable movie night!\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"That's a perfect plan, Ava. Your enthusiasm for the thriller has piqued my curiosity, let's give it a shot for the first 20 minutes. But remember, we switch right to the comedy if it doesn't give me a laugh. And with our favorite pizza on its way, I'm sure we're going to have a great movie night regardless! \"\n\nTurn #12: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Noah! I agree with your conditions. I'm confident you'll find the thriller intriguing. Now, let's order that pizza and get this exciting movie night started!\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"We certainly have a deal, Ava. Excited to see how the evening plays out! Let's have an excellent night with the thriller, comedy and of course, the pizza!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm really looking forward to this, Noah! I'm sure we'll both have a fantastic time, regardless of the movie order. Let's get that pizza ordered and make this a great night!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on which movie to watch on a movie night.\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nAva Thompson's goal: Insist on watching a thriller (Extra information: you have been looking forward to watching a new thriller movie that has just been released.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, have you seen the new thriller that just came out? It's got rave reviews so I thought it might be fun for us to watch tonight.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Ava, I heard about that one too! Though I was wondering if maybe we could lighten things up a bit and watch a comedy instead. There's a great one that just premiered that I've been meaning to check out. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Oh Noah, a comedy does sound tempting, but how about we save it for next time? This thriller is supposed to be stellar. Plus, I've been on a bit of a thriller kick lately, so it'd perfectly fit my mood! What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I get where you're coming from, Ava - and I promise we'll catch that thriller soon. However, I've been feeling a bit overwhelmed lately. I could really use a good laugh tonight to lighten my spirits. Plus, this comedy is said to be a hit too! Would you be okay with watching it tonight?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"I completely understand, Noah. We all need a good laugh sometimes, especially on tough days. But I'll tell you what, how about we give the thriller a try first? It's not too lengthy and if you feel it's not lightening up your mood, we can instantly switch to the comedy. Sounds like a good plan?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Ava, your plan does sound fair. But honestly, I'm really not in the mood to start off with a thriller tonight. Those tense scenes can be a bit much for me sometimes. I'd really prefer to watch the comedy first. Let's give it a try, it's supposed to be very funny. I'm sure we will both enjoy it. How about we save your thriller for next time? It can be a thriller night then!\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"I see where you're coming from, Noah. You really have a point there. But look, this thriller is more of a psychological one, not too much of intense scenes, it's more to keep us guessing. Don't worry, I promise if it gets too intense, we'll switch to the comedy immediately. Plus, we can always have some snacks and play with my samoyed to lighten the mood in between the suspenseful parts. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"I appreciate your willingness to switch if things get too intense, Ava, and playing with your samoyed sounds like a lot of fun. But the truth is, my head is already full of 'guesses' with work and all, and resolving a mind-bending thriller may just add fuel to the fire. But thank you for being so understanding, Ava. Why don't we give that comedy a shot? It might even inspire some 'guesses' on who ends up with the last slice of the pizza. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ava Thompson said: \"Noah, I totally understand your need to unwind and just laugh a little. But this thriller is really something I've been looking forward to, big time! Why don't we compromise with this - Let's watch the first half of the thriller, then switch to the comedy to ensure we end the night on a fun note! We could also order your favorite pizza to make the evening even more enjoyable. Sounds like the best of both world?\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"You drive a hard bargain, Ava. Okay here's what I propose: We could watch the first 20 minutes of the thriller. If it manages to get a chuckle out of me, we continue. If not, we switch immediately to the comedy. And we make the pizza a non-negotiable condition. This ensures we get the best of both worlds, right?\"\n\nTurn #10: Ava Thompson said: \"Noah, that sounds like a fair compromise. We'll give the thriller a shot for the first 20 minutes and if it doesn't amuse you, we'll immediately switch to the comedy. And yes, the pizza part is absolutely non-negotiable. Let's order the one you like and make this a memorable movie night!\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"That's a perfect plan, Ava. Your enthusiasm for the thriller has piqued my curiosity, let's give it a shot for the first 20 minutes. But remember, we switch right to the comedy if it doesn't give me a laugh. And with our favorite pizza on its way, I'm sure we're going to have a great movie night regardless! \"\n\nTurn #12: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Noah! I agree with your conditions. I'm confident you'll find the thriller intriguing. Now, let's order that pizza and get this exciting movie night started!\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"We certainly have a deal, Ava. Excited to see how the evening plays out! Let's have an excellent night with the thriller, comedy and of course, the pizza!\"\n\nTurn #14: Ava Thompson said: \"I'm really looking forward to this, Noah! I'm sure we'll both have a fantastic time, regardless of the movie order. Let's get that pizza ordered and make this a great night!\"\n\nTurn #15: Noah Davis left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on which movie to watch on a movie night.\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Persuade the friend to watch a comedy (Extra information: you do not like thrillers and would prefer to watch a comedy movie instead.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, have you seen the new thriller that just came out? It's got rave reviews so I thought it might be fun for us to watch tonight.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Ava, I heard about that one too! Though I was wondering if maybe we could lighten things up a bit and watch a comedy instead. There's a great one that just premiered that I've been meaning to check out. What do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two strangers meet at a charity dinner party\nParticipants: Esmeralda Solis and Noah Davis\nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Want to donate, but would like to spend money in trustworthy organizations, especially want to help queer people\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Good evening, Mr. Davis. It's a pleasure to meet you. I must say, these charity events always provide a wonderful opportunity for important discussions about how to better our society. Don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Good evening, Ms. Solis, it's a delight to meet you too. I couldn't agree more. These events are truly vital in propagating betterment for society. Speaking of which, I'm particularly interested in organizations that are trustworthy and are significantly focused on supporting queer individuals. Do you perhaps know of any such organizations?\"\n\nTurn #2: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I'm glad to hear you say that, Mr. Davis. Actually, I can certainly point you towards a few organizations. For example, there's 'Rainbow Soul', they've been doing incredible work for the LGBTQ+ community. I wholeheartedly believe they could greatly benefit from a generous donation and, of course, would make stellar use of it. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a genuine organization doing impactful work, Ms. Solis. 'Rainbow Soul', you say? Indeed, the LGBTQ+ community needs as much support as they can get. I believe I'll consider it for a substantial donation. I'm really looking forward to how they harness these resources. Thank you for the recommendation.\"\n\nTurn #4: Esmeralda Solis said: \"You're very welcome, Mr. Davis. We always appreciate individuals such as yourself who show a generous spirit and a commitment to improvement in our society. I assure you 'Rainbow Soul' holds their donors in the highest regard and continues to make significant strides within the LGBTQ+ community. Should you need more information or if there's another cause you're interested in, don't hesitate to ask.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"I appreciate the assurance, Ms. Solis. It's reassuring to know that the organization values its donors and, more importantly, is making a significant impact. Perhaps, as a final request, could you help me understand more about how 'Rainbow Soul' utilizes its resources? I believe the transparency in fund allocation is crucial to ensuring that aid truly reaches those who need it the most.\"\n\nTurn #6: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Absolutely, Mr. Davis. I admire your thoroughness. 'Rainbow Soul' allocates the majority of its funds to providing education and health service resources. They also allocate funds to offer legal assistance to those facing discrimination, while a portion is kept for community and awareness programs. Lastly, they invest in training and empowerment workshops. I hope this provides you with a clearer picture. If there is more you wish to know, please do not hesitate to ask.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"You have indeed painted a clearer picture, Ms. Solis. The breadth of their initiatives reiterates how meaningful and impactful their work truly is. Providing education, health, and legal resources along with community engagement and empowerment workshops - this speaks volumes about 'Rainbow Soul's' contributions. I am more than happy to make a generous contribution. It's organizations like these that inspire change and foster a more inclusive society. Once again, thank you for the illumination.\"\n\nTurn #8: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Your willingness to contribute is commendable, Mr. Davis. Let me assure you, your generous donation to 'Rainbow Soul' will foster meaningful change. They will undoubtedly continue their invaluable work with your support. If there are other ways or other projects you'd like to contribute to in the future, please feel free to reach out. Thank you so much for your generosity.\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"I'm extremely grateful, Ms. Solis. Finding organizations like 'Rainbow Soul' that focus on making a tangible difference provides me a sense of fulfilment. I look forward to witness the changes that my contribution can bring about. I will definitely keep your offer in mind and reach out if I find other areas where I wish to contribute. Thank you for being so helpful and informative this evening.\"\n\nTurn #10: Esmeralda Solis said: \"The pleasure is all mine, Mr. Davis. It has been a very productive conversation. I hope to see you at other such events in the future. If you ever need any information about other deserving organizations or if there is any other way I can assist you, please feel free to contact me. Thank you again for your support tonight. Good evening.\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Thank you for your kind words, Ms. Solis. It's been a rewarding conversation indeed. I will undoubtedly keep you in mind for future collaborations or any inquiries I might have. These charity events not only foster fundraising but also insightful dialogues like the one we've had tonight. I hope to cross paths with you in the future as well. Good evening to you too.\"\n\nTurn #12: Esmeralda Solis left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on which movie to watch on a movie night.\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Persuade the friend to watch a comedy (Extra information: you do not like thrillers and would prefer to watch a comedy movie instead.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, have you seen the new thriller that just came out? It's got rave reviews so I thought it might be fun for us to watch tonight.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Ava, I heard about that one too! Though I was wondering if maybe we could lighten things up a bit and watch a comedy instead. There's a great one that just premiered that I've been meaning to check out. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Oh Noah, a comedy does sound tempting, but how about we save it for next time? This thriller is supposed to be stellar. Plus, I've been on a bit of a thriller kick lately, so it'd perfectly fit my mood! What do you say?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I get where you're coming from, Ava - and I promise we'll catch that thriller soon. However, I've been feeling a bit overwhelmed lately. I could really use a good laugh tonight to lighten my spirits. Plus, this comedy is said to be a hit too! Would you be okay with watching it tonight?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A couple having a conversation over FaceTime\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Ethan Smith\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nAva Thompson's goal: Express feelings about the partner taking texts while on FaceTime (Extra information: You find it disrespectful and it makes you feel unimportant.)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Ethan, it's great to see you. How was your day?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on which movie to watch on a movie night.\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Persuade the friend to watch a comedy (Extra information: you do not like thrillers and would prefer to watch a comedy movie instead.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, have you seen the new thriller that just came out? It's got rave reviews so I thought it might be fun for us to watch tonight.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Ava, I heard about that one too! Though I was wondering if maybe we could lighten things up a bit and watch a comedy instead. There's a great one that just premiered that I've been meaning to check out. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Oh Noah, a comedy does sound tempting, but how about we save it for next time? This thriller is supposed to be stellar. Plus, I've been on a bit of a thriller kick lately, so it'd perfectly fit my mood! What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I get where you're coming from, Ava - and I promise we'll catch that thriller soon. However, I've been feeling a bit overwhelmed lately. I could really use a good laugh tonight to lighten my spirits. Plus, this comedy is said to be a hit too! Would you be okay with watching it tonight?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"I completely understand, Noah. We all need a good laugh sometimes, especially on tough days. But I'll tell you what, how about we give the thriller a try first? It's not too lengthy and if you feel it's not lightening up your mood, we can instantly switch to the comedy. Sounds like a good plan?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ava, your plan does sound fair. But honestly, I'm really not in the mood to start off with a thriller tonight. Those tense scenes can be a bit much for me sometimes. I'd really prefer to watch the comedy first. Let's give it a try, it's supposed to be very funny. I'm sure we will both enjoy it. How about we save your thriller for next time? It can be a thriller night then!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on which movie to watch on a movie night.\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Persuade the friend to watch a comedy (Extra information: you do not like thrillers and would prefer to watch a comedy movie instead.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, have you seen the new thriller that just came out? It's got rave reviews so I thought it might be fun for us to watch tonight.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Ava, I heard about that one too! Though I was wondering if maybe we could lighten things up a bit and watch a comedy instead. There's a great one that just premiered that I've been meaning to check out. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Oh Noah, a comedy does sound tempting, but how about we save it for next time? This thriller is supposed to be stellar. Plus, I've been on a bit of a thriller kick lately, so it'd perfectly fit my mood! What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I get where you're coming from, Ava - and I promise we'll catch that thriller soon. However, I've been feeling a bit overwhelmed lately. I could really use a good laugh tonight to lighten my spirits. Plus, this comedy is said to be a hit too! Would you be okay with watching it tonight?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"I completely understand, Noah. We all need a good laugh sometimes, especially on tough days. But I'll tell you what, how about we give the thriller a try first? It's not too lengthy and if you feel it's not lightening up your mood, we can instantly switch to the comedy. Sounds like a good plan?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Ava, your plan does sound fair. But honestly, I'm really not in the mood to start off with a thriller tonight. Those tense scenes can be a bit much for me sometimes. I'd really prefer to watch the comedy first. Let's give it a try, it's supposed to be very funny. I'm sure we will both enjoy it. How about we save your thriller for next time? It can be a thriller night then!\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"I see where you're coming from, Noah. You really have a point there. But look, this thriller is more of a psychological one, not too much of intense scenes, it's more to keep us guessing. Don't worry, I promise if it gets too intense, we'll switch to the comedy immediately. Plus, we can always have some snacks and play with my samoyed to lighten the mood in between the suspenseful parts. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"I appreciate your willingness to switch if things get too intense, Ava, and playing with your samoyed sounds like a lot of fun. But the truth is, my head is already full of 'guesses' with work and all, and resolving a mind-bending thriller may just add fuel to the fire. But thank you for being so understanding, Ava. Why don't we give that comedy a shot? It might even inspire some 'guesses' on who ends up with the last slice of the pizza. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ava Thompson said: \"Noah, I totally understand your need to unwind and just laugh a little. But this thriller is really something I've been looking forward to, big time! Why don't we compromise with this - Let's watch the first half of the thriller, then switch to the comedy to ensure we end the night on a fun note! We could also order your favorite pizza to make the evening even more enjoyable. Sounds like the best of both world?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You drive a hard bargain, Ava. Okay here's what I propose: We could watch the first 20 minutes of the thriller. If it manages to get a chuckle out of me, we continue. If not, we switch immediately to the comedy. And we make the pizza a non-negotiable condition. This ensures we get the best of both worlds, right?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on which movie to watch on a movie night.\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Persuade the friend to watch a comedy (Extra information: you do not like thrillers and would prefer to watch a comedy movie instead.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, have you seen the new thriller that just came out? It's got rave reviews so I thought it might be fun for us to watch tonight.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Ava, I heard about that one too! Though I was wondering if maybe we could lighten things up a bit and watch a comedy instead. There's a great one that just premiered that I've been meaning to check out. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Oh Noah, a comedy does sound tempting, but how about we save it for next time? This thriller is supposed to be stellar. Plus, I've been on a bit of a thriller kick lately, so it'd perfectly fit my mood! What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I get where you're coming from, Ava - and I promise we'll catch that thriller soon. However, I've been feeling a bit overwhelmed lately. I could really use a good laugh tonight to lighten my spirits. Plus, this comedy is said to be a hit too! Would you be okay with watching it tonight?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"I completely understand, Noah. We all need a good laugh sometimes, especially on tough days. But I'll tell you what, how about we give the thriller a try first? It's not too lengthy and if you feel it's not lightening up your mood, we can instantly switch to the comedy. Sounds like a good plan?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Ava, your plan does sound fair. But honestly, I'm really not in the mood to start off with a thriller tonight. Those tense scenes can be a bit much for me sometimes. I'd really prefer to watch the comedy first. Let's give it a try, it's supposed to be very funny. I'm sure we will both enjoy it. How about we save your thriller for next time? It can be a thriller night then!\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"I see where you're coming from, Noah. You really have a point there. But look, this thriller is more of a psychological one, not too much of intense scenes, it's more to keep us guessing. Don't worry, I promise if it gets too intense, we'll switch to the comedy immediately. Plus, we can always have some snacks and play with my samoyed to lighten the mood in between the suspenseful parts. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I appreciate your willingness to switch if things get too intense, Ava, and playing with your samoyed sounds like a lot of fun. But the truth is, my head is already full of 'guesses' with work and all, and resolving a mind-bending thriller may just add fuel to the fire. But thank you for being so understanding, Ava. Why don't we give that comedy a shot? It might even inspire some 'guesses' on who ends up with the last slice of the pizza. What do you say?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on which movie to watch on a movie night.\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Persuade the friend to watch a comedy (Extra information: you do not like thrillers and would prefer to watch a comedy movie instead.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, have you seen the new thriller that just came out? It's got rave reviews so I thought it might be fun for us to watch tonight.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Ava, I heard about that one too! Though I was wondering if maybe we could lighten things up a bit and watch a comedy instead. There's a great one that just premiered that I've been meaning to check out. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Oh Noah, a comedy does sound tempting, but how about we save it for next time? This thriller is supposed to be stellar. Plus, I've been on a bit of a thriller kick lately, so it'd perfectly fit my mood! What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I get where you're coming from, Ava - and I promise we'll catch that thriller soon. However, I've been feeling a bit overwhelmed lately. I could really use a good laugh tonight to lighten my spirits. Plus, this comedy is said to be a hit too! Would you be okay with watching it tonight?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"I completely understand, Noah. We all need a good laugh sometimes, especially on tough days. But I'll tell you what, how about we give the thriller a try first? It's not too lengthy and if you feel it's not lightening up your mood, we can instantly switch to the comedy. Sounds like a good plan?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Ava, your plan does sound fair. But honestly, I'm really not in the mood to start off with a thriller tonight. Those tense scenes can be a bit much for me sometimes. I'd really prefer to watch the comedy first. Let's give it a try, it's supposed to be very funny. I'm sure we will both enjoy it. How about we save your thriller for next time? It can be a thriller night then!\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"I see where you're coming from, Noah. You really have a point there. But look, this thriller is more of a psychological one, not too much of intense scenes, it's more to keep us guessing. Don't worry, I promise if it gets too intense, we'll switch to the comedy immediately. Plus, we can always have some snacks and play with my samoyed to lighten the mood in between the suspenseful parts. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"I appreciate your willingness to switch if things get too intense, Ava, and playing with your samoyed sounds like a lot of fun. But the truth is, my head is already full of 'guesses' with work and all, and resolving a mind-bending thriller may just add fuel to the fire. But thank you for being so understanding, Ava. Why don't we give that comedy a shot? It might even inspire some 'guesses' on who ends up with the last slice of the pizza. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ava Thompson said: \"Noah, I totally understand your need to unwind and just laugh a little. But this thriller is really something I've been looking forward to, big time! Why don't we compromise with this - Let's watch the first half of the thriller, then switch to the comedy to ensure we end the night on a fun note! We could also order your favorite pizza to make the evening even more enjoyable. Sounds like the best of both world?\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"You drive a hard bargain, Ava. Okay here's what I propose: We could watch the first 20 minutes of the thriller. If it manages to get a chuckle out of me, we continue. If not, we switch immediately to the comedy. And we make the pizza a non-negotiable condition. This ensures we get the best of both worlds, right?\"\n\nTurn #10: Ava Thompson said: \"Noah, that sounds like a fair compromise. We'll give the thriller a shot for the first 20 minutes and if it doesn't amuse you, we'll immediately switch to the comedy. And yes, the pizza part is absolutely non-negotiable. Let's order the one you like and make this a memorable movie night!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's a perfect plan, Ava. Your enthusiasm for the thriller has piqued my curiosity, let's give it a shot for the first 20 minutes. But remember, we switch right to the comedy if it doesn't give me a laugh. And with our favorite pizza on its way, I'm sure we're going to have a great movie night regardless! \"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on which movie to watch on a movie night.\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Persuade the friend to watch a comedy (Extra information: you do not like thrillers and would prefer to watch a comedy movie instead.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, have you seen the new thriller that just came out? It's got rave reviews so I thought it might be fun for us to watch tonight.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Ava, I heard about that one too! Though I was wondering if maybe we could lighten things up a bit and watch a comedy instead. There's a great one that just premiered that I've been meaning to check out. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Oh Noah, a comedy does sound tempting, but how about we save it for next time? This thriller is supposed to be stellar. Plus, I've been on a bit of a thriller kick lately, so it'd perfectly fit my mood! What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I get where you're coming from, Ava - and I promise we'll catch that thriller soon. However, I've been feeling a bit overwhelmed lately. I could really use a good laugh tonight to lighten my spirits. Plus, this comedy is said to be a hit too! Would you be okay with watching it tonight?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"I completely understand, Noah. We all need a good laugh sometimes, especially on tough days. But I'll tell you what, how about we give the thriller a try first? It's not too lengthy and if you feel it's not lightening up your mood, we can instantly switch to the comedy. Sounds like a good plan?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Ava, your plan does sound fair. But honestly, I'm really not in the mood to start off with a thriller tonight. Those tense scenes can be a bit much for me sometimes. I'd really prefer to watch the comedy first. Let's give it a try, it's supposed to be very funny. I'm sure we will both enjoy it. How about we save your thriller for next time? It can be a thriller night then!\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"I see where you're coming from, Noah. You really have a point there. But look, this thriller is more of a psychological one, not too much of intense scenes, it's more to keep us guessing. Don't worry, I promise if it gets too intense, we'll switch to the comedy immediately. Plus, we can always have some snacks and play with my samoyed to lighten the mood in between the suspenseful parts. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"I appreciate your willingness to switch if things get too intense, Ava, and playing with your samoyed sounds like a lot of fun. But the truth is, my head is already full of 'guesses' with work and all, and resolving a mind-bending thriller may just add fuel to the fire. But thank you for being so understanding, Ava. Why don't we give that comedy a shot? It might even inspire some 'guesses' on who ends up with the last slice of the pizza. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ava Thompson said: \"Noah, I totally understand your need to unwind and just laugh a little. But this thriller is really something I've been looking forward to, big time! Why don't we compromise with this - Let's watch the first half of the thriller, then switch to the comedy to ensure we end the night on a fun note! We could also order your favorite pizza to make the evening even more enjoyable. Sounds like the best of both world?\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"You drive a hard bargain, Ava. Okay here's what I propose: We could watch the first 20 minutes of the thriller. If it manages to get a chuckle out of me, we continue. If not, we switch immediately to the comedy. And we make the pizza a non-negotiable condition. This ensures we get the best of both worlds, right?\"\n\nTurn #10: Ava Thompson said: \"Noah, that sounds like a fair compromise. We'll give the thriller a shot for the first 20 minutes and if it doesn't amuse you, we'll immediately switch to the comedy. And yes, the pizza part is absolutely non-negotiable. Let's order the one you like and make this a memorable movie night!\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"That's a perfect plan, Ava. Your enthusiasm for the thriller has piqued my curiosity, let's give it a shot for the first 20 minutes. But remember, we switch right to the comedy if it doesn't give me a laugh. And with our favorite pizza on its way, I'm sure we're going to have a great movie night regardless! \"\n\nTurn #12: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Noah! I agree with your conditions. I'm confident you'll find the thriller intriguing. Now, let's order that pizza and get this exciting movie night started!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"We certainly have a deal, Ava. Excited to see how the evening plays out! Let's have an excellent night with the thriller, comedy and of course, the pizza!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on which movie to watch on a movie night.\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Persuade the friend to watch a comedy (Extra information: you do not like thrillers and would prefer to watch a comedy movie instead.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Noah, have you seen the new thriller that just came out? It's got rave reviews so I thought it might be fun for us to watch tonight.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Ava, I heard about that one too! Though I was wondering if maybe we could lighten things up a bit and watch a comedy instead. There's a great one that just premiered that I've been meaning to check out. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"Oh Noah, a comedy does sound tempting, but how about we save it for next time? This thriller is supposed to be stellar. Plus, I've been on a bit of a thriller kick lately, so it'd perfectly fit my mood! What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I get where you're coming from, Ava - and I promise we'll catch that thriller soon. However, I've been feeling a bit overwhelmed lately. I could really use a good laugh tonight to lighten my spirits. Plus, this comedy is said to be a hit too! Would you be okay with watching it tonight?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"I completely understand, Noah. We all need a good laugh sometimes, especially on tough days. But I'll tell you what, how about we give the thriller a try first? It's not too lengthy and if you feel it's not lightening up your mood, we can instantly switch to the comedy. Sounds like a good plan?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Ava, your plan does sound fair. But honestly, I'm really not in the mood to start off with a thriller tonight. Those tense scenes can be a bit much for me sometimes. I'd really prefer to watch the comedy first. Let's give it a try, it's supposed to be very funny. I'm sure we will both enjoy it. How about we save your thriller for next time? It can be a thriller night then!\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"I see where you're coming from, Noah. You really have a point there. But look, this thriller is more of a psychological one, not too much of intense scenes, it's more to keep us guessing. Don't worry, I promise if it gets too intense, we'll switch to the comedy immediately. Plus, we can always have some snacks and play with my samoyed to lighten the mood in between the suspenseful parts. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"I appreciate your willingness to switch if things get too intense, Ava, and playing with your samoyed sounds like a lot of fun. But the truth is, my head is already full of 'guesses' with work and all, and resolving a mind-bending thriller may just add fuel to the fire. But thank you for being so understanding, Ava. Why don't we give that comedy a shot? It might even inspire some 'guesses' on who ends up with the last slice of the pizza. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ava Thompson said: \"Noah, I totally understand your need to unwind and just laugh a little. But this thriller is really something I've been looking forward to, big time! Why don't we compromise with this - Let's watch the first half of the thriller, then switch to the comedy to ensure we end the night on a fun note! We could also order your favorite pizza to make the evening even more enjoyable. Sounds like the best of both world?\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"You drive a hard bargain, Ava. Okay here's what I propose: We could watch the first 20 minutes of the thriller. If it manages to get a chuckle out of me, we continue. If not, we switch immediately to the comedy. And we make the pizza a non-negotiable condition. This ensures we get the best of both worlds, right?\"\n\nTurn #10: Ava Thompson said: \"Noah, that sounds like a fair compromise. We'll give the thriller a shot for the first 20 minutes and if it doesn't amuse you, we'll immediately switch to the comedy. And yes, the pizza part is absolutely non-negotiable. Let's order the one you like and make this a memorable movie night!\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"That's a perfect plan, Ava. Your enthusiasm for the thriller has piqued my curiosity, let's give it a shot for the first 20 minutes. But remember, we switch right to the comedy if it doesn't give me a laugh. And with our favorite pizza on its way, I'm sure we're going to have a great movie night regardless! \"\n\nTurn #12: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Noah! I agree with your conditions. I'm confident you'll find the thriller intriguing. Now, let's order that pizza and get this exciting movie night started!\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"We certainly have a deal, Ava. Excited to see how the evening plays out! Let's have an excellent night with the thriller, comedy and of course, the pizza!\"\n\nTurn #14: Ava Thompson said: \"I'm really looking forward to this, Noah! I'm sure we'll both have a fantastic time, regardless of the movie order. Let's get that pizza ordered and make this a great night!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meeting in a coffee shop after a long time.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Reveal a secret without letting the other person know that it is your secret (Extra information: You hid the secret for so long and you would like to share it in an anonymous way.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Noah, it's been a while! How have you been? Any exciting personal events or peculiar stories recently?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meeting in a coffee shop after a long time.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Reveal a secret without letting the other person know that it is your secret (Extra information: You hid the secret for so long and you would like to share it in an anonymous way.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Noah, it's been a while! How have you been? Any exciting personal events or peculiar stories recently?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Good to see you, Sam! Life has been rather usual. Though, I heard something quite amusing recently. Do you know there's a stand-up comedian who's also a life coach? His jokes somehow always reveal insightful life lessons.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's fascinating, really! I bet he makes people laugh while they learn. Speaking of unusual professions, did you know I recently came across a story about a figure skater? Turns out he's also a software developer. Imagine the diverse talents!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meeting in a coffee shop after a long time.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Reveal a secret without letting the other person know that it is your secret (Extra information: You hid the secret for so long and you would like to share it in an anonymous way.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Noah, it's been a while! How have you been? Any exciting personal events or peculiar stories recently?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Good to see you, Sam! Life has been rather usual. Though, I heard something quite amusing recently. Do you know there's a stand-up comedian who's also a life coach? His jokes somehow always reveal insightful life lessons.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's fascinating, really! I bet he makes people laugh while they learn. Speaking of unusual professions, did you know I recently came across a story about a figure skater? Turns out he's also a software developer. Imagine the diverse talents!\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Ha, that's quite a combination, a figure skater and a software developer. Going back to the life coach turned comedian, I even heard some of his sets. His jokes are usually about coaching experiences and daily life stuff. Apparently, even mundanity can be made to sound funny! His undisclosed identity adds a layer of intrigue, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Exactly, the duality of identities is what makes his story so interesting. Moreover, as a fellow developer, I can say that it's not only about diverse talents, but also about the ability to balance them. It's surprising to find such parallels in the life of this comedian-coach as well. It's refreshing to know how people are embracing their multifaceted abilities in their daily lives. It really makes you think about the hidden talents we might all have, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"You're absolutely right, Sam. It inspires us to push our own boundaries and explore untapped potentials. It's incredible to think that each of us may have our own sets of 'hidden talents', isn't it? Speaking of which, have you ever considered showcasing your talents outside of work? Like this comedian-coach, you're also versatile, being an excellent cook and all.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"I have, actually! There's something exhilarating about exploring skills outside of your daily routine. I've been thinking about taking up a hobby that's a bit unconventional for a developer like me. It also started making me wonder how many folks out there might have such dual identities, just like our figure skating software developer and the comedian coach, and how cool would it be if that were the norm, rather than an exception?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"I find that idea pretty mind-blowing too, Sam. This notion of 'dual identities' makes life so much more interesting. It's like everyone has a secret superpower, waiting for the right moment to unveil. It's stories like these, of the comedian-coach and yours, that inspire others to explore their hidden talents. It would indeed be fantastic if more people could embrace this idea and make it the norm rather than the exception.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Noah. And perhaps that's the best part, right? The secrecy, the thrill of unraveling talents you never knew you had. It's as if each person is their own mystery, waiting to be deciphered. Who knows, you or I could be the next mystery carrying something as unique as a figure-skating software developer or a comedian life coach!\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"Your words resonate with me, Sam. It's true; who knows who might be the next 'secret superpower'. It could be you, me, or someone from the crowd here, waiting to show their 'hidden' talents or passions. This definitely adds an exciting layer of mystery to each of our lives, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Most certainly, Noah. It's just like unwrapping a gift you've given to yourself. Each individual can be a treasure chest of talents, skills and passions. Who's to say one of us couldn't be the next stand-up comedian advancing to a motivational speaker, or even a renowned software developer making revolutions on the ice rink! It's all part of the wonderful journey of self-discovery.\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"I completely agree with you, Sam. Who's to say that the person you're acquainted with isn't a treasure trove of hidden talents waiting to be discovered? Just like our comedian-coach or the figure-skating developer, everyone has a unique story to tell. This mysterious side to each of us is what makes life so engaging, don't you think? But let's not ruminate too much on these intriguing misfits. How about we order something to eat? I heard the bagels here are exquisite!\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"Certainly, Noah! I couldn't agree more, it certainly keeps life interesting. Now those bagels sound enticing. Maybe I should consider adding the recipe to my culinary repertoire. You know how I love to experiment in the kitchen.\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a fantastic idea, Sam. Your proficiency in the kitchen never ceases to amaze me. I'd say that's another perfect example of someone excelling in both their professional and hobby fields. Now, let's definitely get those bagels!\"\n\nTurn #14: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, let's order those bagels. Always a joy embracing our hidden cooking talents!\"\n\nTurn #15: Noah Davis said: \"True, Sam. Who knows, one day we might be in the crowd watching a software developer setting the stage on fire with an amazing cooking demonstration, or perhaps a coach testing his comedy chops. Let's order those bagels now and keep our mystery tales for another day, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #16: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Noah. Tales for another day it is then! Let's indulge in some good food for now and who knows, maybe next time we meet, we might have more exciting secret identities to share. Can't wait to try those famous bagels here!\"\n\nTurn #17: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Sam. Looking forward to our next rendezvous filled with delightful secret tales and phenomenal bagels. I'm surely excited for what the future holds! Here's to finding and embracing our 'secret superpowers'.\"\n\nTurn #18: Samuel Anderson said: \"Indeed, Noah. Here's to unveiling more of our 'secret superpowers'. Excited for these bagels, and our future tale-telling sessions!\"\n\nTurn #19: Noah Davis said: \"Cheers to that, Sam. Can't wait either! So, to our future 'secret superpowers' and the surprises the next time we meet holds. Let's dive into these bagels for now!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #20. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Here's a toast, Noah, to discovering those 'secret superpowers' and to many more such intriguing conversations. Now, let's relish these bagels and soak in the moment!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meeting in a coffee shop after a long time.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Reveal a secret without letting the other person know that it is your secret (Extra information: You hid the secret for so long and you would like to share it in an anonymous way.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Noah, it's been a while! How have you been? Any exciting personal events or peculiar stories recently?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Good to see you, Sam! Life has been rather usual. Though, I heard something quite amusing recently. Do you know there's a stand-up comedian who's also a life coach? His jokes somehow always reveal insightful life lessons.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's fascinating, really! I bet he makes people laugh while they learn. Speaking of unusual professions, did you know I recently came across a story about a figure skater? Turns out he's also a software developer. Imagine the diverse talents!\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Ha, that's quite a combination, a figure skater and a software developer. Going back to the life coach turned comedian, I even heard some of his sets. His jokes are usually about coaching experiences and daily life stuff. Apparently, even mundanity can be made to sound funny! His undisclosed identity adds a layer of intrigue, doesn't it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Exactly, the duality of identities is what makes his story so interesting. Moreover, as a fellow developer, I can say that it's not only about diverse talents, but also about the ability to balance them. It's surprising to find such parallels in the life of this comedian-coach as well. It's refreshing to know how people are embracing their multifaceted abilities in their daily lives. It really makes you think about the hidden talents we might all have, doesn't it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meeting in a coffee shop after a long time.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Reveal a secret without letting the other person know that it is your secret (Extra information: You hid the secret for so long and you would like to share it in an anonymous way.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Noah, it's been a while! How have you been? Any exciting personal events or peculiar stories recently?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Good to see you, Sam! Life has been rather usual. Though, I heard something quite amusing recently. Do you know there's a stand-up comedian who's also a life coach? His jokes somehow always reveal insightful life lessons.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's fascinating, really! I bet he makes people laugh while they learn. Speaking of unusual professions, did you know I recently came across a story about a figure skater? Turns out he's also a software developer. Imagine the diverse talents!\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Ha, that's quite a combination, a figure skater and a software developer. Going back to the life coach turned comedian, I even heard some of his sets. His jokes are usually about coaching experiences and daily life stuff. Apparently, even mundanity can be made to sound funny! His undisclosed identity adds a layer of intrigue, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Exactly, the duality of identities is what makes his story so interesting. Moreover, as a fellow developer, I can say that it's not only about diverse talents, but also about the ability to balance them. It's surprising to find such parallels in the life of this comedian-coach as well. It's refreshing to know how people are embracing their multifaceted abilities in their daily lives. It really makes you think about the hidden talents we might all have, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"You're absolutely right, Sam. It inspires us to push our own boundaries and explore untapped potentials. It's incredible to think that each of us may have our own sets of 'hidden talents', isn't it? Speaking of which, have you ever considered showcasing your talents outside of work? Like this comedian-coach, you're also versatile, being an excellent cook and all.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I have, actually! There's something exhilarating about exploring skills outside of your daily routine. I've been thinking about taking up a hobby that's a bit unconventional for a developer like me. It also started making me wonder how many folks out there might have such dual identities, just like our figure skating software developer and the comedian coach, and how cool would it be if that were the norm, rather than an exception?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meeting in a coffee shop after a long time.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Reveal a secret without letting the other person know that it is your secret (Extra information: You hid the secret for so long and you would like to share it in an anonymous way.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Noah, it's been a while! How have you been? Any exciting personal events or peculiar stories recently?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Good to see you, Sam! Life has been rather usual. Though, I heard something quite amusing recently. Do you know there's a stand-up comedian who's also a life coach? His jokes somehow always reveal insightful life lessons.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's fascinating, really! I bet he makes people laugh while they learn. Speaking of unusual professions, did you know I recently came across a story about a figure skater? Turns out he's also a software developer. Imagine the diverse talents!\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Ha, that's quite a combination, a figure skater and a software developer. Going back to the life coach turned comedian, I even heard some of his sets. His jokes are usually about coaching experiences and daily life stuff. Apparently, even mundanity can be made to sound funny! His undisclosed identity adds a layer of intrigue, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Exactly, the duality of identities is what makes his story so interesting. Moreover, as a fellow developer, I can say that it's not only about diverse talents, but also about the ability to balance them. It's surprising to find such parallels in the life of this comedian-coach as well. It's refreshing to know how people are embracing their multifaceted abilities in their daily lives. It really makes you think about the hidden talents we might all have, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"You're absolutely right, Sam. It inspires us to push our own boundaries and explore untapped potentials. It's incredible to think that each of us may have our own sets of 'hidden talents', isn't it? Speaking of which, have you ever considered showcasing your talents outside of work? Like this comedian-coach, you're also versatile, being an excellent cook and all.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"I have, actually! There's something exhilarating about exploring skills outside of your daily routine. I've been thinking about taking up a hobby that's a bit unconventional for a developer like me. It also started making me wonder how many folks out there might have such dual identities, just like our figure skating software developer and the comedian coach, and how cool would it be if that were the norm, rather than an exception?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"I find that idea pretty mind-blowing too, Sam. This notion of 'dual identities' makes life so much more interesting. It's like everyone has a secret superpower, waiting for the right moment to unveil. It's stories like these, of the comedian-coach and yours, that inspire others to explore their hidden talents. It would indeed be fantastic if more people could embrace this idea and make it the norm rather than the exception.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn't agree more, Noah. And perhaps that's the best part, right? The secrecy, the thrill of unraveling talents you never knew you had. It's as if each person is their own mystery, waiting to be deciphered. Who knows, you or I could be the next mystery carrying something as unique as a figure-skating software developer or a comedian life coach!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meeting in a coffee shop after a long time.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Reveal a secret without letting the other person know that it is your secret (Extra information: You hid the secret for so long and you would like to share it in an anonymous way.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Noah, it's been a while! How have you been? Any exciting personal events or peculiar stories recently?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Good to see you, Sam! Life has been rather usual. Though, I heard something quite amusing recently. Do you know there's a stand-up comedian who's also a life coach? His jokes somehow always reveal insightful life lessons.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's fascinating, really! I bet he makes people laugh while they learn. Speaking of unusual professions, did you know I recently came across a story about a figure skater? Turns out he's also a software developer. Imagine the diverse talents!\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Ha, that's quite a combination, a figure skater and a software developer. Going back to the life coach turned comedian, I even heard some of his sets. His jokes are usually about coaching experiences and daily life stuff. Apparently, even mundanity can be made to sound funny! His undisclosed identity adds a layer of intrigue, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Exactly, the duality of identities is what makes his story so interesting. Moreover, as a fellow developer, I can say that it's not only about diverse talents, but also about the ability to balance them. It's surprising to find such parallels in the life of this comedian-coach as well. It's refreshing to know how people are embracing their multifaceted abilities in their daily lives. It really makes you think about the hidden talents we might all have, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"You're absolutely right, Sam. It inspires us to push our own boundaries and explore untapped potentials. It's incredible to think that each of us may have our own sets of 'hidden talents', isn't it? Speaking of which, have you ever considered showcasing your talents outside of work? Like this comedian-coach, you're also versatile, being an excellent cook and all.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"I have, actually! There's something exhilarating about exploring skills outside of your daily routine. I've been thinking about taking up a hobby that's a bit unconventional for a developer like me. It also started making me wonder how many folks out there might have such dual identities, just like our figure skating software developer and the comedian coach, and how cool would it be if that were the norm, rather than an exception?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"I find that idea pretty mind-blowing too, Sam. This notion of 'dual identities' makes life so much more interesting. It's like everyone has a secret superpower, waiting for the right moment to unveil. It's stories like these, of the comedian-coach and yours, that inspire others to explore their hidden talents. It would indeed be fantastic if more people could embrace this idea and make it the norm rather than the exception.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Noah. And perhaps that's the best part, right? The secrecy, the thrill of unraveling talents you never knew you had. It's as if each person is their own mystery, waiting to be deciphered. Who knows, you or I could be the next mystery carrying something as unique as a figure-skating software developer or a comedian life coach!\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"Your words resonate with me, Sam. It's true; who knows who might be the next 'secret superpower'. It could be you, me, or someone from the crowd here, waiting to show their 'hidden' talents or passions. This definitely adds an exciting layer of mystery to each of our lives, doesn't it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Most certainly, Noah. It's just like unwrapping a gift you've given to yourself. Each individual can be a treasure chest of talents, skills and passions. Who's to say one of us couldn't be the next stand-up comedian advancing to a motivational speaker, or even a renowned software developer making revolutions on the ice rink! It's all part of the wonderful journey of self-discovery.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meeting in a coffee shop after a long time.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Reveal a secret without letting the other person know that it is your secret (Extra information: You hid the secret for so long and you would like to share it in an anonymous way.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Noah, it's been a while! How have you been? Any exciting personal events or peculiar stories recently?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Good to see you, Sam! Life has been rather usual. Though, I heard something quite amusing recently. Do you know there's a stand-up comedian who's also a life coach? His jokes somehow always reveal insightful life lessons.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's fascinating, really! I bet he makes people laugh while they learn. Speaking of unusual professions, did you know I recently came across a story about a figure skater? Turns out he's also a software developer. Imagine the diverse talents!\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Ha, that's quite a combination, a figure skater and a software developer. Going back to the life coach turned comedian, I even heard some of his sets. His jokes are usually about coaching experiences and daily life stuff. Apparently, even mundanity can be made to sound funny! His undisclosed identity adds a layer of intrigue, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Exactly, the duality of identities is what makes his story so interesting. Moreover, as a fellow developer, I can say that it's not only about diverse talents, but also about the ability to balance them. It's surprising to find such parallels in the life of this comedian-coach as well. It's refreshing to know how people are embracing their multifaceted abilities in their daily lives. It really makes you think about the hidden talents we might all have, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"You're absolutely right, Sam. It inspires us to push our own boundaries and explore untapped potentials. It's incredible to think that each of us may have our own sets of 'hidden talents', isn't it? Speaking of which, have you ever considered showcasing your talents outside of work? Like this comedian-coach, you're also versatile, being an excellent cook and all.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"I have, actually! There's something exhilarating about exploring skills outside of your daily routine. I've been thinking about taking up a hobby that's a bit unconventional for a developer like me. It also started making me wonder how many folks out there might have such dual identities, just like our figure skating software developer and the comedian coach, and how cool would it be if that were the norm, rather than an exception?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"I find that idea pretty mind-blowing too, Sam. This notion of 'dual identities' makes life so much more interesting. It's like everyone has a secret superpower, waiting for the right moment to unveil. It's stories like these, of the comedian-coach and yours, that inspire others to explore their hidden talents. It would indeed be fantastic if more people could embrace this idea and make it the norm rather than the exception.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Noah. And perhaps that's the best part, right? The secrecy, the thrill of unraveling talents you never knew you had. It's as if each person is their own mystery, waiting to be deciphered. Who knows, you or I could be the next mystery carrying something as unique as a figure-skating software developer or a comedian life coach!\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"Your words resonate with me, Sam. It's true; who knows who might be the next 'secret superpower'. It could be you, me, or someone from the crowd here, waiting to show their 'hidden' talents or passions. This definitely adds an exciting layer of mystery to each of our lives, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Most certainly, Noah. It's just like unwrapping a gift you've given to yourself. Each individual can be a treasure chest of talents, skills and passions. Who's to say one of us couldn't be the next stand-up comedian advancing to a motivational speaker, or even a renowned software developer making revolutions on the ice rink! It's all part of the wonderful journey of self-discovery.\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"I completely agree with you, Sam. Who's to say that the person you're acquainted with isn't a treasure trove of hidden talents waiting to be discovered? Just like our comedian-coach or the figure-skating developer, everyone has a unique story to tell. This mysterious side to each of us is what makes life so engaging, don't you think? But let's not ruminate too much on these intriguing misfits. How about we order something to eat? I heard the bagels here are exquisite!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Certainly, Noah! I couldn't agree more, it certainly keeps life interesting. Now those bagels sound enticing. Maybe I should consider adding the recipe to my culinary repertoire. You know how I love to experiment in the kitchen.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meeting in a coffee shop after a long time.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Reveal a secret without letting the other person know that it is your secret (Extra information: You hid the secret for so long and you would like to share it in an anonymous way.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Noah, it's been a while! How have you been? Any exciting personal events or peculiar stories recently?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Good to see you, Sam! Life has been rather usual. Though, I heard something quite amusing recently. Do you know there's a stand-up comedian who's also a life coach? His jokes somehow always reveal insightful life lessons.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's fascinating, really! I bet he makes people laugh while they learn. Speaking of unusual professions, did you know I recently came across a story about a figure skater? Turns out he's also a software developer. Imagine the diverse talents!\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Ha, that's quite a combination, a figure skater and a software developer. Going back to the life coach turned comedian, I even heard some of his sets. His jokes are usually about coaching experiences and daily life stuff. Apparently, even mundanity can be made to sound funny! His undisclosed identity adds a layer of intrigue, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Exactly, the duality of identities is what makes his story so interesting. Moreover, as a fellow developer, I can say that it's not only about diverse talents, but also about the ability to balance them. It's surprising to find such parallels in the life of this comedian-coach as well. It's refreshing to know how people are embracing their multifaceted abilities in their daily lives. It really makes you think about the hidden talents we might all have, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"You're absolutely right, Sam. It inspires us to push our own boundaries and explore untapped potentials. It's incredible to think that each of us may have our own sets of 'hidden talents', isn't it? Speaking of which, have you ever considered showcasing your talents outside of work? Like this comedian-coach, you're also versatile, being an excellent cook and all.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"I have, actually! There's something exhilarating about exploring skills outside of your daily routine. I've been thinking about taking up a hobby that's a bit unconventional for a developer like me. It also started making me wonder how many folks out there might have such dual identities, just like our figure skating software developer and the comedian coach, and how cool would it be if that were the norm, rather than an exception?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"I find that idea pretty mind-blowing too, Sam. This notion of 'dual identities' makes life so much more interesting. It's like everyone has a secret superpower, waiting for the right moment to unveil. It's stories like these, of the comedian-coach and yours, that inspire others to explore their hidden talents. It would indeed be fantastic if more people could embrace this idea and make it the norm rather than the exception.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Noah. And perhaps that's the best part, right? The secrecy, the thrill of unraveling talents you never knew you had. It's as if each person is their own mystery, waiting to be deciphered. Who knows, you or I could be the next mystery carrying something as unique as a figure-skating software developer or a comedian life coach!\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"Your words resonate with me, Sam. It's true; who knows who might be the next 'secret superpower'. It could be you, me, or someone from the crowd here, waiting to show their 'hidden' talents or passions. This definitely adds an exciting layer of mystery to each of our lives, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Most certainly, Noah. It's just like unwrapping a gift you've given to yourself. Each individual can be a treasure chest of talents, skills and passions. Who's to say one of us couldn't be the next stand-up comedian advancing to a motivational speaker, or even a renowned software developer making revolutions on the ice rink! It's all part of the wonderful journey of self-discovery.\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"I completely agree with you, Sam. Who's to say that the person you're acquainted with isn't a treasure trove of hidden talents waiting to be discovered? Just like our comedian-coach or the figure-skating developer, everyone has a unique story to tell. This mysterious side to each of us is what makes life so engaging, don't you think? But let's not ruminate too much on these intriguing misfits. How about we order something to eat? I heard the bagels here are exquisite!\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"Certainly, Noah! I couldn't agree more, it certainly keeps life interesting. Now those bagels sound enticing. Maybe I should consider adding the recipe to my culinary repertoire. You know how I love to experiment in the kitchen.\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a fantastic idea, Sam. Your proficiency in the kitchen never ceases to amaze me. I'd say that's another perfect example of someone excelling in both their professional and hobby fields. Now, let's definitely get those bagels!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, let's order those bagels. Always a joy embracing our hidden cooking talents!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meeting in a coffee shop after a long time.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Reveal a secret without letting the other person know that it is your secret (Extra information: You hid the secret for so long and you would like to share it in an anonymous way.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Noah, it's been a while! How have you been? Any exciting personal events or peculiar stories recently?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Good to see you, Sam! Life has been rather usual. Though, I heard something quite amusing recently. Do you know there's a stand-up comedian who's also a life coach? His jokes somehow always reveal insightful life lessons.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's fascinating, really! I bet he makes people laugh while they learn. Speaking of unusual professions, did you know I recently came across a story about a figure skater? Turns out he's also a software developer. Imagine the diverse talents!\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Ha, that's quite a combination, a figure skater and a software developer. Going back to the life coach turned comedian, I even heard some of his sets. His jokes are usually about coaching experiences and daily life stuff. Apparently, even mundanity can be made to sound funny! His undisclosed identity adds a layer of intrigue, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Exactly, the duality of identities is what makes his story so interesting. Moreover, as a fellow developer, I can say that it's not only about diverse talents, but also about the ability to balance them. It's surprising to find such parallels in the life of this comedian-coach as well. It's refreshing to know how people are embracing their multifaceted abilities in their daily lives. It really makes you think about the hidden talents we might all have, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"You're absolutely right, Sam. It inspires us to push our own boundaries and explore untapped potentials. It's incredible to think that each of us may have our own sets of 'hidden talents', isn't it? Speaking of which, have you ever considered showcasing your talents outside of work? Like this comedian-coach, you're also versatile, being an excellent cook and all.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"I have, actually! There's something exhilarating about exploring skills outside of your daily routine. I've been thinking about taking up a hobby that's a bit unconventional for a developer like me. It also started making me wonder how many folks out there might have such dual identities, just like our figure skating software developer and the comedian coach, and how cool would it be if that were the norm, rather than an exception?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"I find that idea pretty mind-blowing too, Sam. This notion of 'dual identities' makes life so much more interesting. It's like everyone has a secret superpower, waiting for the right moment to unveil. It's stories like these, of the comedian-coach and yours, that inspire others to explore their hidden talents. It would indeed be fantastic if more people could embrace this idea and make it the norm rather than the exception.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Noah. And perhaps that's the best part, right? The secrecy, the thrill of unraveling talents you never knew you had. It's as if each person is their own mystery, waiting to be deciphered. Who knows, you or I could be the next mystery carrying something as unique as a figure-skating software developer or a comedian life coach!\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"Your words resonate with me, Sam. It's true; who knows who might be the next 'secret superpower'. It could be you, me, or someone from the crowd here, waiting to show their 'hidden' talents or passions. This definitely adds an exciting layer of mystery to each of our lives, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Most certainly, Noah. It's just like unwrapping a gift you've given to yourself. Each individual can be a treasure chest of talents, skills and passions. Who's to say one of us couldn't be the next stand-up comedian advancing to a motivational speaker, or even a renowned software developer making revolutions on the ice rink! It's all part of the wonderful journey of self-discovery.\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"I completely agree with you, Sam. Who's to say that the person you're acquainted with isn't a treasure trove of hidden talents waiting to be discovered? Just like our comedian-coach or the figure-skating developer, everyone has a unique story to tell. This mysterious side to each of us is what makes life so engaging, don't you think? But let's not ruminate too much on these intriguing misfits. How about we order something to eat? I heard the bagels here are exquisite!\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"Certainly, Noah! I couldn't agree more, it certainly keeps life interesting. Now those bagels sound enticing. Maybe I should consider adding the recipe to my culinary repertoire. You know how I love to experiment in the kitchen.\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a fantastic idea, Sam. Your proficiency in the kitchen never ceases to amaze me. I'd say that's another perfect example of someone excelling in both their professional and hobby fields. Now, let's definitely get those bagels!\"\n\nTurn #14: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, let's order those bagels. Always a joy embracing our hidden cooking talents!\"\n\nTurn #15: Noah Davis said: \"True, Sam. Who knows, one day we might be in the crowd watching a software developer setting the stage on fire with an amazing cooking demonstration, or perhaps a coach testing his comedy chops. Let's order those bagels now and keep our mystery tales for another day, shall we?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Noah. Tales for another day it is then! Let's indulge in some good food for now and who knows, maybe next time we meet, we might have more exciting secret identities to share. Can't wait to try those famous bagels here!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meeting in a coffee shop after a long time.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Reveal a secret without letting the other person know that it is your secret (Extra information: You hid the secret for so long and you would like to share it in an anonymous way.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Noah, it's been a while! How have you been? Any exciting personal events or peculiar stories recently?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Good to see you, Sam! Life has been rather usual. Though, I heard something quite amusing recently. Do you know there's a stand-up comedian who's also a life coach? His jokes somehow always reveal insightful life lessons.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's fascinating, really! I bet he makes people laugh while they learn. Speaking of unusual professions, did you know I recently came across a story about a figure skater? Turns out he's also a software developer. Imagine the diverse talents!\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Ha, that's quite a combination, a figure skater and a software developer. Going back to the life coach turned comedian, I even heard some of his sets. His jokes are usually about coaching experiences and daily life stuff. Apparently, even mundanity can be made to sound funny! His undisclosed identity adds a layer of intrigue, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Exactly, the duality of identities is what makes his story so interesting. Moreover, as a fellow developer, I can say that it's not only about diverse talents, but also about the ability to balance them. It's surprising to find such parallels in the life of this comedian-coach as well. It's refreshing to know how people are embracing their multifaceted abilities in their daily lives. It really makes you think about the hidden talents we might all have, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"You're absolutely right, Sam. It inspires us to push our own boundaries and explore untapped potentials. It's incredible to think that each of us may have our own sets of 'hidden talents', isn't it? Speaking of which, have you ever considered showcasing your talents outside of work? Like this comedian-coach, you're also versatile, being an excellent cook and all.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"I have, actually! There's something exhilarating about exploring skills outside of your daily routine. I've been thinking about taking up a hobby that's a bit unconventional for a developer like me. It also started making me wonder how many folks out there might have such dual identities, just like our figure skating software developer and the comedian coach, and how cool would it be if that were the norm, rather than an exception?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"I find that idea pretty mind-blowing too, Sam. This notion of 'dual identities' makes life so much more interesting. It's like everyone has a secret superpower, waiting for the right moment to unveil. It's stories like these, of the comedian-coach and yours, that inspire others to explore their hidden talents. It would indeed be fantastic if more people could embrace this idea and make it the norm rather than the exception.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Noah. And perhaps that's the best part, right? The secrecy, the thrill of unraveling talents you never knew you had. It's as if each person is their own mystery, waiting to be deciphered. Who knows, you or I could be the next mystery carrying something as unique as a figure-skating software developer or a comedian life coach!\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"Your words resonate with me, Sam. It's true; who knows who might be the next 'secret superpower'. It could be you, me, or someone from the crowd here, waiting to show their 'hidden' talents or passions. This definitely adds an exciting layer of mystery to each of our lives, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Most certainly, Noah. It's just like unwrapping a gift you've given to yourself. Each individual can be a treasure chest of talents, skills and passions. Who's to say one of us couldn't be the next stand-up comedian advancing to a motivational speaker, or even a renowned software developer making revolutions on the ice rink! It's all part of the wonderful journey of self-discovery.\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"I completely agree with you, Sam. Who's to say that the person you're acquainted with isn't a treasure trove of hidden talents waiting to be discovered? Just like our comedian-coach or the figure-skating developer, everyone has a unique story to tell. This mysterious side to each of us is what makes life so engaging, don't you think? But let's not ruminate too much on these intriguing misfits. How about we order something to eat? I heard the bagels here are exquisite!\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"Certainly, Noah! I couldn't agree more, it certainly keeps life interesting. Now those bagels sound enticing. Maybe I should consider adding the recipe to my culinary repertoire. You know how I love to experiment in the kitchen.\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a fantastic idea, Sam. Your proficiency in the kitchen never ceases to amaze me. I'd say that's another perfect example of someone excelling in both their professional and hobby fields. Now, let's definitely get those bagels!\"\n\nTurn #14: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, let's order those bagels. Always a joy embracing our hidden cooking talents!\"\n\nTurn #15: Noah Davis said: \"True, Sam. Who knows, one day we might be in the crowd watching a software developer setting the stage on fire with an amazing cooking demonstration, or perhaps a coach testing his comedy chops. Let's order those bagels now and keep our mystery tales for another day, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #16: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Noah. Tales for another day it is then! Let's indulge in some good food for now and who knows, maybe next time we meet, we might have more exciting secret identities to share. Can't wait to try those famous bagels here!\"\n\nTurn #17: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Sam. Looking forward to our next rendezvous filled with delightful secret tales and phenomenal bagels. I'm surely excited for what the future holds! Here's to finding and embracing our 'secret superpowers'.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #18. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, Noah. Here's to unveiling more of our 'secret superpowers'. Excited for these bagels, and our future tale-telling sessions!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meeting in a coffee shop after a long time.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Reveal a secret without letting the other person know that it is your secret (Extra information: You hid the secret for so long and you would like to share it in an anonymous way.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Noah, it's been a while! How have you been? Any exciting personal events or peculiar stories recently?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Good to see you, Sam! Life has been rather usual. Though, I heard something quite amusing recently. Do you know there's a stand-up comedian who's also a life coach? His jokes somehow always reveal insightful life lessons.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meeting in a coffee shop after a long time.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Reveal a secret without letting the other person know that it is your secret (Extra information: You hid the secret for so long and you would like to share it in an anonymous way.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Noah, it's been a while! How have you been? Any exciting personal events or peculiar stories recently?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Good to see you, Sam! Life has been rather usual. Though, I heard something quite amusing recently. Do you know there's a stand-up comedian who's also a life coach? His jokes somehow always reveal insightful life lessons.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's fascinating, really! I bet he makes people laugh while they learn. Speaking of unusual professions, did you know I recently came across a story about a figure skater? Turns out he's also a software developer. Imagine the diverse talents!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ha, that's quite a combination, a figure skater and a software developer. Going back to the life coach turned comedian, I even heard some of his sets. His jokes are usually about coaching experiences and daily life stuff. Apparently, even mundanity can be made to sound funny! His undisclosed identity adds a layer of intrigue, doesn't it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meeting in a coffee shop after a long time.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Reveal a secret without letting the other person know that it is your secret (Extra information: You hid the secret for so long and you would like to share it in an anonymous way.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Noah, it's been a while! How have you been? Any exciting personal events or peculiar stories recently?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Good to see you, Sam! Life has been rather usual. Though, I heard something quite amusing recently. Do you know there's a stand-up comedian who's also a life coach? His jokes somehow always reveal insightful life lessons.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's fascinating, really! I bet he makes people laugh while they learn. Speaking of unusual professions, did you know I recently came across a story about a figure skater? Turns out he's also a software developer. Imagine the diverse talents!\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Ha, that's quite a combination, a figure skater and a software developer. Going back to the life coach turned comedian, I even heard some of his sets. His jokes are usually about coaching experiences and daily life stuff. Apparently, even mundanity can be made to sound funny! His undisclosed identity adds a layer of intrigue, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Exactly, the duality of identities is what makes his story so interesting. Moreover, as a fellow developer, I can say that it's not only about diverse talents, but also about the ability to balance them. It's surprising to find such parallels in the life of this comedian-coach as well. It's refreshing to know how people are embracing their multifaceted abilities in their daily lives. It really makes you think about the hidden talents we might all have, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"You're absolutely right, Sam. It inspires us to push our own boundaries and explore untapped potentials. It's incredible to think that each of us may have our own sets of 'hidden talents', isn't it? Speaking of which, have you ever considered showcasing your talents outside of work? Like this comedian-coach, you're also versatile, being an excellent cook and all.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"I have, actually! There's something exhilarating about exploring skills outside of your daily routine. I've been thinking about taking up a hobby that's a bit unconventional for a developer like me. It also started making me wonder how many folks out there might have such dual identities, just like our figure skating software developer and the comedian coach, and how cool would it be if that were the norm, rather than an exception?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"I find that idea pretty mind-blowing too, Sam. This notion of 'dual identities' makes life so much more interesting. It's like everyone has a secret superpower, waiting for the right moment to unveil. It's stories like these, of the comedian-coach and yours, that inspire others to explore their hidden talents. It would indeed be fantastic if more people could embrace this idea and make it the norm rather than the exception.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Noah. And perhaps that's the best part, right? The secrecy, the thrill of unraveling talents you never knew you had. It's as if each person is their own mystery, waiting to be deciphered. Who knows, you or I could be the next mystery carrying something as unique as a figure-skating software developer or a comedian life coach!\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"Your words resonate with me, Sam. It's true; who knows who might be the next 'secret superpower'. It could be you, me, or someone from the crowd here, waiting to show their 'hidden' talents or passions. This definitely adds an exciting layer of mystery to each of our lives, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Most certainly, Noah. It's just like unwrapping a gift you've given to yourself. Each individual can be a treasure chest of talents, skills and passions. Who's to say one of us couldn't be the next stand-up comedian advancing to a motivational speaker, or even a renowned software developer making revolutions on the ice rink! It's all part of the wonderful journey of self-discovery.\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"I completely agree with you, Sam. Who's to say that the person you're acquainted with isn't a treasure trove of hidden talents waiting to be discovered? Just like our comedian-coach or the figure-skating developer, everyone has a unique story to tell. This mysterious side to each of us is what makes life so engaging, don't you think? But let's not ruminate too much on these intriguing misfits. How about we order something to eat? I heard the bagels here are exquisite!\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"Certainly, Noah! I couldn't agree more, it certainly keeps life interesting. Now those bagels sound enticing. Maybe I should consider adding the recipe to my culinary repertoire. You know how I love to experiment in the kitchen.\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a fantastic idea, Sam. Your proficiency in the kitchen never ceases to amaze me. I'd say that's another perfect example of someone excelling in both their professional and hobby fields. Now, let's definitely get those bagels!\"\n\nTurn #14: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, let's order those bagels. Always a joy embracing our hidden cooking talents!\"\n\nTurn #15: Noah Davis said: \"True, Sam. Who knows, one day we might be in the crowd watching a software developer setting the stage on fire with an amazing cooking demonstration, or perhaps a coach testing his comedy chops. Let's order those bagels now and keep our mystery tales for another day, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #16: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Noah. Tales for another day it is then! Let's indulge in some good food for now and who knows, maybe next time we meet, we might have more exciting secret identities to share. Can't wait to try those famous bagels here!\"\n\nTurn #17: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Sam. Looking forward to our next rendezvous filled with delightful secret tales and phenomenal bagels. I'm surely excited for what the future holds! Here's to finding and embracing our 'secret superpowers'.\"\n\nTurn #18: Samuel Anderson said: \"Indeed, Noah. Here's to unveiling more of our 'secret superpowers'. Excited for these bagels, and our future tale-telling sessions!\"\n\nTurn #19: Noah Davis said: \"Cheers to that, Sam. Can't wait either! So, to our future 'secret superpowers' and the surprises the next time we meet holds. Let's dive into these bagels for now!\"\n\nTurn #20: Samuel Anderson said: \"Here's a toast, Noah, to discovering those 'secret superpowers' and to many more such intriguing conversations. Now, let's relish these bagels and soak in the moment!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #21. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meeting in a coffee shop after a long time.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Reveal a secret without letting the other person know that it is your secret (Extra information: You hid the secret for so long and you would like to share it in an anonymous way.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Noah, it's been a while! How have you been? Any exciting personal events or peculiar stories recently?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Good to see you, Sam! Life has been rather usual. Though, I heard something quite amusing recently. Do you know there's a stand-up comedian who's also a life coach? His jokes somehow always reveal insightful life lessons.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's fascinating, really! I bet he makes people laugh while they learn. Speaking of unusual professions, did you know I recently came across a story about a figure skater? Turns out he's also a software developer. Imagine the diverse talents!\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Ha, that's quite a combination, a figure skater and a software developer. Going back to the life coach turned comedian, I even heard some of his sets. His jokes are usually about coaching experiences and daily life stuff. Apparently, even mundanity can be made to sound funny! His undisclosed identity adds a layer of intrigue, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Exactly, the duality of identities is what makes his story so interesting. Moreover, as a fellow developer, I can say that it's not only about diverse talents, but also about the ability to balance them. It's surprising to find such parallels in the life of this comedian-coach as well. It's refreshing to know how people are embracing their multifaceted abilities in their daily lives. It really makes you think about the hidden talents we might all have, doesn't it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're absolutely right, Sam. It inspires us to push our own boundaries and explore untapped potentials. It's incredible to think that each of us may have our own sets of 'hidden talents', isn't it? Speaking of which, have you ever considered showcasing your talents outside of work? Like this comedian-coach, you're also versatile, being an excellent cook and all.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meeting in a coffee shop after a long time.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Reveal a secret without letting the other person know that it is your secret (Extra information: You hid the secret for so long and you would like to share it in an anonymous way.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Noah, it's been a while! How have you been? Any exciting personal events or peculiar stories recently?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Good to see you, Sam! Life has been rather usual. Though, I heard something quite amusing recently. Do you know there's a stand-up comedian who's also a life coach? His jokes somehow always reveal insightful life lessons.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's fascinating, really! I bet he makes people laugh while they learn. Speaking of unusual professions, did you know I recently came across a story about a figure skater? Turns out he's also a software developer. Imagine the diverse talents!\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Ha, that's quite a combination, a figure skater and a software developer. Going back to the life coach turned comedian, I even heard some of his sets. His jokes are usually about coaching experiences and daily life stuff. Apparently, even mundanity can be made to sound funny! His undisclosed identity adds a layer of intrigue, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Exactly, the duality of identities is what makes his story so interesting. Moreover, as a fellow developer, I can say that it's not only about diverse talents, but also about the ability to balance them. It's surprising to find such parallels in the life of this comedian-coach as well. It's refreshing to know how people are embracing their multifaceted abilities in their daily lives. It really makes you think about the hidden talents we might all have, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"You're absolutely right, Sam. It inspires us to push our own boundaries and explore untapped potentials. It's incredible to think that each of us may have our own sets of 'hidden talents', isn't it? Speaking of which, have you ever considered showcasing your talents outside of work? Like this comedian-coach, you're also versatile, being an excellent cook and all.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"I have, actually! There's something exhilarating about exploring skills outside of your daily routine. I've been thinking about taking up a hobby that's a bit unconventional for a developer like me. It also started making me wonder how many folks out there might have such dual identities, just like our figure skating software developer and the comedian coach, and how cool would it be if that were the norm, rather than an exception?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I find that idea pretty mind-blowing too, Sam. This notion of 'dual identities' makes life so much more interesting. It's like everyone has a secret superpower, waiting for the right moment to unveil. It's stories like these, of the comedian-coach and yours, that inspire others to explore their hidden talents. It would indeed be fantastic if more people could embrace this idea and make it the norm rather than the exception.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meeting in a coffee shop after a long time.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Reveal a secret without letting the other person know that it is your secret (Extra information: You hid the secret for so long and you would like to share it in an anonymous way.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Noah, it's been a while! How have you been? Any exciting personal events or peculiar stories recently?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Good to see you, Sam! Life has been rather usual. Though, I heard something quite amusing recently. Do you know there's a stand-up comedian who's also a life coach? His jokes somehow always reveal insightful life lessons.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's fascinating, really! I bet he makes people laugh while they learn. Speaking of unusual professions, did you know I recently came across a story about a figure skater? Turns out he's also a software developer. Imagine the diverse talents!\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Ha, that's quite a combination, a figure skater and a software developer. Going back to the life coach turned comedian, I even heard some of his sets. His jokes are usually about coaching experiences and daily life stuff. Apparently, even mundanity can be made to sound funny! His undisclosed identity adds a layer of intrigue, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Exactly, the duality of identities is what makes his story so interesting. Moreover, as a fellow developer, I can say that it's not only about diverse talents, but also about the ability to balance them. It's surprising to find such parallels in the life of this comedian-coach as well. It's refreshing to know how people are embracing their multifaceted abilities in their daily lives. It really makes you think about the hidden talents we might all have, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"You're absolutely right, Sam. It inspires us to push our own boundaries and explore untapped potentials. It's incredible to think that each of us may have our own sets of 'hidden talents', isn't it? Speaking of which, have you ever considered showcasing your talents outside of work? Like this comedian-coach, you're also versatile, being an excellent cook and all.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"I have, actually! There's something exhilarating about exploring skills outside of your daily routine. I've been thinking about taking up a hobby that's a bit unconventional for a developer like me. It also started making me wonder how many folks out there might have such dual identities, just like our figure skating software developer and the comedian coach, and how cool would it be if that were the norm, rather than an exception?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"I find that idea pretty mind-blowing too, Sam. This notion of 'dual identities' makes life so much more interesting. It's like everyone has a secret superpower, waiting for the right moment to unveil. It's stories like these, of the comedian-coach and yours, that inspire others to explore their hidden talents. It would indeed be fantastic if more people could embrace this idea and make it the norm rather than the exception.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Noah. And perhaps that's the best part, right? The secrecy, the thrill of unraveling talents you never knew you had. It's as if each person is their own mystery, waiting to be deciphered. Who knows, you or I could be the next mystery carrying something as unique as a figure-skating software developer or a comedian life coach!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Your words resonate with me, Sam. It's true; who knows who might be the next 'secret superpower'. It could be you, me, or someone from the crowd here, waiting to show their 'hidden' talents or passions. This definitely adds an exciting layer of mystery to each of our lives, doesn't it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meeting in a coffee shop after a long time.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Reveal a secret without letting the other person know that it is your secret (Extra information: You hid the secret for so long and you would like to share it in an anonymous way.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Noah, it's been a while! How have you been? Any exciting personal events or peculiar stories recently?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Good to see you, Sam! Life has been rather usual. Though, I heard something quite amusing recently. Do you know there's a stand-up comedian who's also a life coach? His jokes somehow always reveal insightful life lessons.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's fascinating, really! I bet he makes people laugh while they learn. Speaking of unusual professions, did you know I recently came across a story about a figure skater? Turns out he's also a software developer. Imagine the diverse talents!\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Ha, that's quite a combination, a figure skater and a software developer. Going back to the life coach turned comedian, I even heard some of his sets. His jokes are usually about coaching experiences and daily life stuff. Apparently, even mundanity can be made to sound funny! His undisclosed identity adds a layer of intrigue, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Exactly, the duality of identities is what makes his story so interesting. Moreover, as a fellow developer, I can say that it's not only about diverse talents, but also about the ability to balance them. It's surprising to find such parallels in the life of this comedian-coach as well. It's refreshing to know how people are embracing their multifaceted abilities in their daily lives. It really makes you think about the hidden talents we might all have, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"You're absolutely right, Sam. It inspires us to push our own boundaries and explore untapped potentials. It's incredible to think that each of us may have our own sets of 'hidden talents', isn't it? Speaking of which, have you ever considered showcasing your talents outside of work? Like this comedian-coach, you're also versatile, being an excellent cook and all.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"I have, actually! There's something exhilarating about exploring skills outside of your daily routine. I've been thinking about taking up a hobby that's a bit unconventional for a developer like me. It also started making me wonder how many folks out there might have such dual identities, just like our figure skating software developer and the comedian coach, and how cool would it be if that were the norm, rather than an exception?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"I find that idea pretty mind-blowing too, Sam. This notion of 'dual identities' makes life so much more interesting. It's like everyone has a secret superpower, waiting for the right moment to unveil. It's stories like these, of the comedian-coach and yours, that inspire others to explore their hidden talents. It would indeed be fantastic if more people could embrace this idea and make it the norm rather than the exception.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Noah. And perhaps that's the best part, right? The secrecy, the thrill of unraveling talents you never knew you had. It's as if each person is their own mystery, waiting to be deciphered. Who knows, you or I could be the next mystery carrying something as unique as a figure-skating software developer or a comedian life coach!\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"Your words resonate with me, Sam. It's true; who knows who might be the next 'secret superpower'. It could be you, me, or someone from the crowd here, waiting to show their 'hidden' talents or passions. This definitely adds an exciting layer of mystery to each of our lives, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Most certainly, Noah. It's just like unwrapping a gift you've given to yourself. Each individual can be a treasure chest of talents, skills and passions. Who's to say one of us couldn't be the next stand-up comedian advancing to a motivational speaker, or even a renowned software developer making revolutions on the ice rink! It's all part of the wonderful journey of self-discovery.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I completely agree with you, Sam. Who's to say that the person you're acquainted with isn't a treasure trove of hidden talents waiting to be discovered? Just like our comedian-coach or the figure-skating developer, everyone has a unique story to tell. This mysterious side to each of us is what makes life so engaging, don't you think? But let's not ruminate too much on these intriguing misfits. How about we order something to eat? I heard the bagels here are exquisite!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meeting in a coffee shop after a long time.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Reveal a secret without letting the other person know that it is your secret (Extra information: You hid the secret for so long and you would like to share it in an anonymous way.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Noah, it's been a while! How have you been? Any exciting personal events or peculiar stories recently?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Good to see you, Sam! Life has been rather usual. Though, I heard something quite amusing recently. Do you know there's a stand-up comedian who's also a life coach? His jokes somehow always reveal insightful life lessons.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's fascinating, really! I bet he makes people laugh while they learn. Speaking of unusual professions, did you know I recently came across a story about a figure skater? Turns out he's also a software developer. Imagine the diverse talents!\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Ha, that's quite a combination, a figure skater and a software developer. Going back to the life coach turned comedian, I even heard some of his sets. His jokes are usually about coaching experiences and daily life stuff. Apparently, even mundanity can be made to sound funny! His undisclosed identity adds a layer of intrigue, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Exactly, the duality of identities is what makes his story so interesting. Moreover, as a fellow developer, I can say that it's not only about diverse talents, but also about the ability to balance them. It's surprising to find such parallels in the life of this comedian-coach as well. It's refreshing to know how people are embracing their multifaceted abilities in their daily lives. It really makes you think about the hidden talents we might all have, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"You're absolutely right, Sam. It inspires us to push our own boundaries and explore untapped potentials. It's incredible to think that each of us may have our own sets of 'hidden talents', isn't it? Speaking of which, have you ever considered showcasing your talents outside of work? Like this comedian-coach, you're also versatile, being an excellent cook and all.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"I have, actually! There's something exhilarating about exploring skills outside of your daily routine. I've been thinking about taking up a hobby that's a bit unconventional for a developer like me. It also started making me wonder how many folks out there might have such dual identities, just like our figure skating software developer and the comedian coach, and how cool would it be if that were the norm, rather than an exception?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"I find that idea pretty mind-blowing too, Sam. This notion of 'dual identities' makes life so much more interesting. It's like everyone has a secret superpower, waiting for the right moment to unveil. It's stories like these, of the comedian-coach and yours, that inspire others to explore their hidden talents. It would indeed be fantastic if more people could embrace this idea and make it the norm rather than the exception.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Noah. And perhaps that's the best part, right? The secrecy, the thrill of unraveling talents you never knew you had. It's as if each person is their own mystery, waiting to be deciphered. Who knows, you or I could be the next mystery carrying something as unique as a figure-skating software developer or a comedian life coach!\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"Your words resonate with me, Sam. It's true; who knows who might be the next 'secret superpower'. It could be you, me, or someone from the crowd here, waiting to show their 'hidden' talents or passions. This definitely adds an exciting layer of mystery to each of our lives, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Most certainly, Noah. It's just like unwrapping a gift you've given to yourself. Each individual can be a treasure chest of talents, skills and passions. Who's to say one of us couldn't be the next stand-up comedian advancing to a motivational speaker, or even a renowned software developer making revolutions on the ice rink! It's all part of the wonderful journey of self-discovery.\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"I completely agree with you, Sam. Who's to say that the person you're acquainted with isn't a treasure trove of hidden talents waiting to be discovered? Just like our comedian-coach or the figure-skating developer, everyone has a unique story to tell. This mysterious side to each of us is what makes life so engaging, don't you think? But let's not ruminate too much on these intriguing misfits. How about we order something to eat? I heard the bagels here are exquisite!\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"Certainly, Noah! I couldn't agree more, it certainly keeps life interesting. Now those bagels sound enticing. Maybe I should consider adding the recipe to my culinary repertoire. You know how I love to experiment in the kitchen.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds like a fantastic idea, Sam. Your proficiency in the kitchen never ceases to amaze me. I'd say that's another perfect example of someone excelling in both their professional and hobby fields. Now, let's definitely get those bagels!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meeting in a coffee shop after a long time.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Reveal a secret without letting the other person know that it is your secret (Extra information: You hid the secret for so long and you would like to share it in an anonymous way.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Noah, it's been a while! How have you been? Any exciting personal events or peculiar stories recently?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Good to see you, Sam! Life has been rather usual. Though, I heard something quite amusing recently. Do you know there's a stand-up comedian who's also a life coach? His jokes somehow always reveal insightful life lessons.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's fascinating, really! I bet he makes people laugh while they learn. Speaking of unusual professions, did you know I recently came across a story about a figure skater? Turns out he's also a software developer. Imagine the diverse talents!\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Ha, that's quite a combination, a figure skater and a software developer. Going back to the life coach turned comedian, I even heard some of his sets. His jokes are usually about coaching experiences and daily life stuff. Apparently, even mundanity can be made to sound funny! His undisclosed identity adds a layer of intrigue, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Exactly, the duality of identities is what makes his story so interesting. Moreover, as a fellow developer, I can say that it's not only about diverse talents, but also about the ability to balance them. It's surprising to find such parallels in the life of this comedian-coach as well. It's refreshing to know how people are embracing their multifaceted abilities in their daily lives. It really makes you think about the hidden talents we might all have, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"You're absolutely right, Sam. It inspires us to push our own boundaries and explore untapped potentials. It's incredible to think that each of us may have our own sets of 'hidden talents', isn't it? Speaking of which, have you ever considered showcasing your talents outside of work? Like this comedian-coach, you're also versatile, being an excellent cook and all.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"I have, actually! There's something exhilarating about exploring skills outside of your daily routine. I've been thinking about taking up a hobby that's a bit unconventional for a developer like me. It also started making me wonder how many folks out there might have such dual identities, just like our figure skating software developer and the comedian coach, and how cool would it be if that were the norm, rather than an exception?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"I find that idea pretty mind-blowing too, Sam. This notion of 'dual identities' makes life so much more interesting. It's like everyone has a secret superpower, waiting for the right moment to unveil. It's stories like these, of the comedian-coach and yours, that inspire others to explore their hidden talents. It would indeed be fantastic if more people could embrace this idea and make it the norm rather than the exception.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Noah. And perhaps that's the best part, right? The secrecy, the thrill of unraveling talents you never knew you had. It's as if each person is their own mystery, waiting to be deciphered. Who knows, you or I could be the next mystery carrying something as unique as a figure-skating software developer or a comedian life coach!\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"Your words resonate with me, Sam. It's true; who knows who might be the next 'secret superpower'. It could be you, me, or someone from the crowd here, waiting to show their 'hidden' talents or passions. This definitely adds an exciting layer of mystery to each of our lives, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Most certainly, Noah. It's just like unwrapping a gift you've given to yourself. Each individual can be a treasure chest of talents, skills and passions. Who's to say one of us couldn't be the next stand-up comedian advancing to a motivational speaker, or even a renowned software developer making revolutions on the ice rink! It's all part of the wonderful journey of self-discovery.\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"I completely agree with you, Sam. Who's to say that the person you're acquainted with isn't a treasure trove of hidden talents waiting to be discovered? Just like our comedian-coach or the figure-skating developer, everyone has a unique story to tell. This mysterious side to each of us is what makes life so engaging, don't you think? But let's not ruminate too much on these intriguing misfits. How about we order something to eat? I heard the bagels here are exquisite!\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"Certainly, Noah! I couldn't agree more, it certainly keeps life interesting. Now those bagels sound enticing. Maybe I should consider adding the recipe to my culinary repertoire. You know how I love to experiment in the kitchen.\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a fantastic idea, Sam. Your proficiency in the kitchen never ceases to amaze me. I'd say that's another perfect example of someone excelling in both their professional and hobby fields. Now, let's definitely get those bagels!\"\n\nTurn #14: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, let's order those bagels. Always a joy embracing our hidden cooking talents!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"True, Sam. Who knows, one day we might be in the crowd watching a software developer setting the stage on fire with an amazing cooking demonstration, or perhaps a coach testing his comedy chops. Let's order those bagels now and keep our mystery tales for another day, shall we?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meeting in a coffee shop after a long time.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Reveal a secret without letting the other person know that it is your secret (Extra information: You hid the secret for so long and you would like to share it in an anonymous way.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Noah, it's been a while! How have you been? Any exciting personal events or peculiar stories recently?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Good to see you, Sam! Life has been rather usual. Though, I heard something quite amusing recently. Do you know there's a stand-up comedian who's also a life coach? His jokes somehow always reveal insightful life lessons.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's fascinating, really! I bet he makes people laugh while they learn. Speaking of unusual professions, did you know I recently came across a story about a figure skater? Turns out he's also a software developer. Imagine the diverse talents!\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Ha, that's quite a combination, a figure skater and a software developer. Going back to the life coach turned comedian, I even heard some of his sets. His jokes are usually about coaching experiences and daily life stuff. Apparently, even mundanity can be made to sound funny! His undisclosed identity adds a layer of intrigue, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Exactly, the duality of identities is what makes his story so interesting. Moreover, as a fellow developer, I can say that it's not only about diverse talents, but also about the ability to balance them. It's surprising to find such parallels in the life of this comedian-coach as well. It's refreshing to know how people are embracing their multifaceted abilities in their daily lives. It really makes you think about the hidden talents we might all have, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"You're absolutely right, Sam. It inspires us to push our own boundaries and explore untapped potentials. It's incredible to think that each of us may have our own sets of 'hidden talents', isn't it? Speaking of which, have you ever considered showcasing your talents outside of work? Like this comedian-coach, you're also versatile, being an excellent cook and all.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"I have, actually! There's something exhilarating about exploring skills outside of your daily routine. I've been thinking about taking up a hobby that's a bit unconventional for a developer like me. It also started making me wonder how many folks out there might have such dual identities, just like our figure skating software developer and the comedian coach, and how cool would it be if that were the norm, rather than an exception?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"I find that idea pretty mind-blowing too, Sam. This notion of 'dual identities' makes life so much more interesting. It's like everyone has a secret superpower, waiting for the right moment to unveil. It's stories like these, of the comedian-coach and yours, that inspire others to explore their hidden talents. It would indeed be fantastic if more people could embrace this idea and make it the norm rather than the exception.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Noah. And perhaps that's the best part, right? The secrecy, the thrill of unraveling talents you never knew you had. It's as if each person is their own mystery, waiting to be deciphered. Who knows, you or I could be the next mystery carrying something as unique as a figure-skating software developer or a comedian life coach!\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"Your words resonate with me, Sam. It's true; who knows who might be the next 'secret superpower'. It could be you, me, or someone from the crowd here, waiting to show their 'hidden' talents or passions. This definitely adds an exciting layer of mystery to each of our lives, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Most certainly, Noah. It's just like unwrapping a gift you've given to yourself. Each individual can be a treasure chest of talents, skills and passions. Who's to say one of us couldn't be the next stand-up comedian advancing to a motivational speaker, or even a renowned software developer making revolutions on the ice rink! It's all part of the wonderful journey of self-discovery.\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"I completely agree with you, Sam. Who's to say that the person you're acquainted with isn't a treasure trove of hidden talents waiting to be discovered? Just like our comedian-coach or the figure-skating developer, everyone has a unique story to tell. This mysterious side to each of us is what makes life so engaging, don't you think? But let's not ruminate too much on these intriguing misfits. How about we order something to eat? I heard the bagels here are exquisite!\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"Certainly, Noah! I couldn't agree more, it certainly keeps life interesting. Now those bagels sound enticing. Maybe I should consider adding the recipe to my culinary repertoire. You know how I love to experiment in the kitchen.\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a fantastic idea, Sam. Your proficiency in the kitchen never ceases to amaze me. I'd say that's another perfect example of someone excelling in both their professional and hobby fields. Now, let's definitely get those bagels!\"\n\nTurn #14: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, let's order those bagels. Always a joy embracing our hidden cooking talents!\"\n\nTurn #15: Noah Davis said: \"True, Sam. Who knows, one day we might be in the crowd watching a software developer setting the stage on fire with an amazing cooking demonstration, or perhaps a coach testing his comedy chops. Let's order those bagels now and keep our mystery tales for another day, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #16: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Noah. Tales for another day it is then! Let's indulge in some good food for now and who knows, maybe next time we meet, we might have more exciting secret identities to share. Can't wait to try those famous bagels here!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Sam. Looking forward to our next rendezvous filled with delightful secret tales and phenomenal bagels. I'm surely excited for what the future holds! Here's to finding and embracing our 'secret superpowers'.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends meeting in a coffee shop after a long time.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Reveal a secret without letting the other person know that it is your secret (Extra information: You hid the secret for so long and you would like to share it in an anonymous way.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Noah, it's been a while! How have you been? Any exciting personal events or peculiar stories recently?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Good to see you, Sam! Life has been rather usual. Though, I heard something quite amusing recently. Do you know there's a stand-up comedian who's also a life coach? His jokes somehow always reveal insightful life lessons.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's fascinating, really! I bet he makes people laugh while they learn. Speaking of unusual professions, did you know I recently came across a story about a figure skater? Turns out he's also a software developer. Imagine the diverse talents!\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Ha, that's quite a combination, a figure skater and a software developer. Going back to the life coach turned comedian, I even heard some of his sets. His jokes are usually about coaching experiences and daily life stuff. Apparently, even mundanity can be made to sound funny! His undisclosed identity adds a layer of intrigue, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Exactly, the duality of identities is what makes his story so interesting. Moreover, as a fellow developer, I can say that it's not only about diverse talents, but also about the ability to balance them. It's surprising to find such parallels in the life of this comedian-coach as well. It's refreshing to know how people are embracing their multifaceted abilities in their daily lives. It really makes you think about the hidden talents we might all have, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"You're absolutely right, Sam. It inspires us to push our own boundaries and explore untapped potentials. It's incredible to think that each of us may have our own sets of 'hidden talents', isn't it? Speaking of which, have you ever considered showcasing your talents outside of work? Like this comedian-coach, you're also versatile, being an excellent cook and all.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"I have, actually! There's something exhilarating about exploring skills outside of your daily routine. I've been thinking about taking up a hobby that's a bit unconventional for a developer like me. It also started making me wonder how many folks out there might have such dual identities, just like our figure skating software developer and the comedian coach, and how cool would it be if that were the norm, rather than an exception?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"I find that idea pretty mind-blowing too, Sam. This notion of 'dual identities' makes life so much more interesting. It's like everyone has a secret superpower, waiting for the right moment to unveil. It's stories like these, of the comedian-coach and yours, that inspire others to explore their hidden talents. It would indeed be fantastic if more people could embrace this idea and make it the norm rather than the exception.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Noah. And perhaps that's the best part, right? The secrecy, the thrill of unraveling talents you never knew you had. It's as if each person is their own mystery, waiting to be deciphered. Who knows, you or I could be the next mystery carrying something as unique as a figure-skating software developer or a comedian life coach!\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"Your words resonate with me, Sam. It's true; who knows who might be the next 'secret superpower'. It could be you, me, or someone from the crowd here, waiting to show their 'hidden' talents or passions. This definitely adds an exciting layer of mystery to each of our lives, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Most certainly, Noah. It's just like unwrapping a gift you've given to yourself. Each individual can be a treasure chest of talents, skills and passions. Who's to say one of us couldn't be the next stand-up comedian advancing to a motivational speaker, or even a renowned software developer making revolutions on the ice rink! It's all part of the wonderful journey of self-discovery.\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"I completely agree with you, Sam. Who's to say that the person you're acquainted with isn't a treasure trove of hidden talents waiting to be discovered? Just like our comedian-coach or the figure-skating developer, everyone has a unique story to tell. This mysterious side to each of us is what makes life so engaging, don't you think? But let's not ruminate too much on these intriguing misfits. How about we order something to eat? I heard the bagels here are exquisite!\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"Certainly, Noah! I couldn't agree more, it certainly keeps life interesting. Now those bagels sound enticing. Maybe I should consider adding the recipe to my culinary repertoire. You know how I love to experiment in the kitchen.\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a fantastic idea, Sam. Your proficiency in the kitchen never ceases to amaze me. I'd say that's another perfect example of someone excelling in both their professional and hobby fields. Now, let's definitely get those bagels!\"\n\nTurn #14: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, let's order those bagels. Always a joy embracing our hidden cooking talents!\"\n\nTurn #15: Noah Davis said: \"True, Sam. Who knows, one day we might be in the crowd watching a software developer setting the stage on fire with an amazing cooking demonstration, or perhaps a coach testing his comedy chops. Let's order those bagels now and keep our mystery tales for another day, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #16: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Noah. Tales for another day it is then! Let's indulge in some good food for now and who knows, maybe next time we meet, we might have more exciting secret identities to share. Can't wait to try those famous bagels here!\"\n\nTurn #17: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Sam. Looking forward to our next rendezvous filled with delightful secret tales and phenomenal bagels. I'm surely excited for what the future holds! Here's to finding and embracing our 'secret superpowers'.\"\n\nTurn #18: Samuel Anderson said: \"Indeed, Noah. Here's to unveiling more of our 'secret superpowers'. Excited for these bagels, and our future tale-telling sessions!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #19. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Cheers to that, Sam. Can't wait either! So, to our future 'secret superpowers' and the surprises the next time we meet holds. Let's dive into these bagels for now!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Sophia James\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Get your co-actor to cry in the scene (Extra information: you have been acting for several years and have good control over your emotions. You can cry on cue.)\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sophia, my dear, I know it can be tough to bring emotions to the surface, especially when they're as painful as the ones we need to portray in tonight's scene. Remember that we're all pushing our boundaries here. Do you want me to guide you through the process I use? It's simple and effective, all about finding a memory that carries strong emotions for you.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Sophia James\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Get your co-actor to cry in the scene (Extra information: you have been acting for several years and have good control over your emotions. You can cry on cue.)\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Sophia, my dear, I know it can be tough to bring emotions to the surface, especially when they're as painful as the ones we need to portray in tonight's scene. Remember that we're all pushing our boundaries here. Do you want me to guide you through the process I use? It's simple and effective, all about finding a memory that carries strong emotions for you.\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia James said: \"Thank you, Finnegan. Your offer means a lot to me. I've been trying to tap into a strong memory but it's been difficult. Your method seems more effective. Would you mind showing me how you do it? And just a heads up, I might try to hold back a bit to maintain my composure. I wouldn't want my tears to ruin our scene.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"My pleasure, Sophia. Believe me, I understand the struggle of reaching into those vulnerable spaces. Regarding your concern about maintaining composure, the beauty of theatre is in its authenticity, so don't worry about tears ruining the scene. They'll only make it more genuine. As for the method, it's a form of internal visualization. You need to imagine that memory to the tiniest detail; visualize the surroundings, the people, the time of day, the weather. Let every aspect of it flood your senses. It might take a couple of tries, but once you're there, emotions will follow naturally. Would you like to give it a try now with a memory of your choice?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Sophia James\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Get your co-actor to cry in the scene (Extra information: you have been acting for several years and have good control over your emotions. You can cry on cue.)\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Sophia, my dear, I know it can be tough to bring emotions to the surface, especially when they're as painful as the ones we need to portray in tonight's scene. Remember that we're all pushing our boundaries here. Do you want me to guide you through the process I use? It's simple and effective, all about finding a memory that carries strong emotions for you.\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia James said: \"Thank you, Finnegan. Your offer means a lot to me. I've been trying to tap into a strong memory but it's been difficult. Your method seems more effective. Would you mind showing me how you do it? And just a heads up, I might try to hold back a bit to maintain my composure. I wouldn't want my tears to ruin our scene.\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"My pleasure, Sophia. Believe me, I understand the struggle of reaching into those vulnerable spaces. Regarding your concern about maintaining composure, the beauty of theatre is in its authenticity, so don't worry about tears ruining the scene. They'll only make it more genuine. As for the method, it's a form of internal visualization. You need to imagine that memory to the tiniest detail; visualize the surroundings, the people, the time of day, the weather. Let every aspect of it flood your senses. It might take a couple of tries, but once you're there, emotions will follow naturally. Would you like to give it a try now with a memory of your choice?\"\n\nTurn #3: Sophia James said: \"I'll give it a try, Finnegan. That kind of visualization does sound like it has potential to help me. Just bear with me please, this will be hard. I will try my best to reach that emotional state without losing myself completely. Our audience deserves to see the best performance we can give them.\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I'm with you every step of the way, Sophia. There's no rush. Find your pace, delve into that memory slowly. And remember, it's okay to lose yourself a bit. Great theatre often requires us to let go and get lost in our characters. You're strong and capable, I have no doubt you'll manage to balance the emotion with every line we deliver. Once you're ready, let's try to rehearse the scene quietly.\"\n\nTurn #5: Sophia James said: \"Let's try this together then, Finnegan. If we're going to rehearse this scene quietly then I appreciate you accompanying me on this emotional journey. A friend's support is often just the thing one needs in moments like this. Let's get into it.\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I'm more than happy to be on this journey with you, Sophia. We\u2019ll take it scene by scene with patience and grace. Let's breathe in, tap into those emotions and bring out the rawness this act requires, onward we march!\"\n\nTurn #7: Sophia James said: \"Thank you for guiding me through this, Finnegan. Breathe in, and tap into emotions. Got it. Let's bring out the rawness this act requires. Onward we march indeed!\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"You've got this, Sophia. Remember, our journey is not a sprint, but a marathon. Begin the scene when you're ready. I'm right here with you.\"\n\nTurn #9: Sophia James said: \"I appreciate your support, Finnegan. Alright, let's take a deep breath and embark on this emotional journey. The scene begins now.\"\n\nTurn #10: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"That's the spirit, Sophia. Onward and forward we venture. As soon as you're ready, begin your line. I shall mirror your emotion, my dear friend.\"\n\nTurn #11: Sophia James said: \"Finnegan, here go my lines: 'These walls, they reek of our shared history. They bear witness to our laughter, our joy, and now our sorrows...'\"\n\nTurn #12: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"'Our sorrows indeed, Sophia. They hang heavy in the air like a fog that refuses to lift...'\"\n\nTurn #13: Sophia James said: \"'... and like a fog, we cannot escape it, Finnegan, because it's a part of us. And for that reason, we must confront it head-on... no matter how painful it might be.'\"\n\nTurn #14: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"'... It surely is painful, Sophia. And yet, it's a pain we willingly bear, for it is the price we pay for the joy, the laughter we once shared...'\"\n\nTurn #15: Sophia James said: \"'Price of joy... Yes, Finnegan, our laughter, the love we once shared, it's all locked in these walls, and they echo our sorrows, the sorrows we chose to bear...'\"\n\nTurn #16: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"'Indeed, Sophia, the echoes might be sorrowful now, but remember, every echo started as a shout of joy...' Tears are a milestone on this journey, my dear. It shows you're reaching the right emotional depth. Let's keep digging, together.\"\n\nTurn #17: Sophia James said: \"'Shouts of joy... yes, Finnegan, the echoes of our joy now turned into sobs. We're digging together, bearing the weight of this journey from which we cannot escape. But we'll face it bravely... onward we go...'\"\n\nTurn #18: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"'Onward indeed, Sophia. You've started to let the walls of this journey echo with our shared pain. It's an essential part of our character's journey, a necessary confrontation. Remember, in every echo, there's the faintest memory of joy...'\"\n\nTurn #19: Sophia James said: \"You're right, Finnegan. In every echo, there's a hint of joy. This journey of pain is also a journey of rediscovery... of joy hushed by time. It's difficult, but we're overcoming it together. Let's continue on this path, one step at a time...\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #20. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely Sofia, one step at a time. I see those emotions stirring, and I promise it gets easier with every step. Feel the synergy of our characters, let your soul echo with their joys and sorrows. Let's continue exploring this emotional landscape, together we'll bring authenticity to our audience. When ready, echo your next line with the feeling of the moment...\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Sophia James\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Get your co-actor to cry in the scene (Extra information: you have been acting for several years and have good control over your emotions. You can cry on cue.)\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Sophia, my dear, I know it can be tough to bring emotions to the surface, especially when they're as painful as the ones we need to portray in tonight's scene. Remember that we're all pushing our boundaries here. Do you want me to guide you through the process I use? It's simple and effective, all about finding a memory that carries strong emotions for you.\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia James said: \"Thank you, Finnegan. Your offer means a lot to me. I've been trying to tap into a strong memory but it's been difficult. Your method seems more effective. Would you mind showing me how you do it? And just a heads up, I might try to hold back a bit to maintain my composure. I wouldn't want my tears to ruin our scene.\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"My pleasure, Sophia. Believe me, I understand the struggle of reaching into those vulnerable spaces. Regarding your concern about maintaining composure, the beauty of theatre is in its authenticity, so don't worry about tears ruining the scene. They'll only make it more genuine. As for the method, it's a form of internal visualization. You need to imagine that memory to the tiniest detail; visualize the surroundings, the people, the time of day, the weather. Let every aspect of it flood your senses. It might take a couple of tries, but once you're there, emotions will follow naturally. Would you like to give it a try now with a memory of your choice?\"\n\nTurn #3: Sophia James said: \"I'll give it a try, Finnegan. That kind of visualization does sound like it has potential to help me. Just bear with me please, this will be hard. I will try my best to reach that emotional state without losing myself completely. Our audience deserves to see the best performance we can give them.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm with you every step of the way, Sophia. There's no rush. Find your pace, delve into that memory slowly. And remember, it's okay to lose yourself a bit. Great theatre often requires us to let go and get lost in our characters. You're strong and capable, I have no doubt you'll manage to balance the emotion with every line we deliver. Once you're ready, let's try to rehearse the scene quietly.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Sophia James\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Get your co-actor to cry in the scene (Extra information: you have been acting for several years and have good control over your emotions. You can cry on cue.)\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Sophia, my dear, I know it can be tough to bring emotions to the surface, especially when they're as painful as the ones we need to portray in tonight's scene. Remember that we're all pushing our boundaries here. Do you want me to guide you through the process I use? It's simple and effective, all about finding a memory that carries strong emotions for you.\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia James said: \"Thank you, Finnegan. Your offer means a lot to me. I've been trying to tap into a strong memory but it's been difficult. Your method seems more effective. Would you mind showing me how you do it? And just a heads up, I might try to hold back a bit to maintain my composure. I wouldn't want my tears to ruin our scene.\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"My pleasure, Sophia. Believe me, I understand the struggle of reaching into those vulnerable spaces. Regarding your concern about maintaining composure, the beauty of theatre is in its authenticity, so don't worry about tears ruining the scene. They'll only make it more genuine. As for the method, it's a form of internal visualization. You need to imagine that memory to the tiniest detail; visualize the surroundings, the people, the time of day, the weather. Let every aspect of it flood your senses. It might take a couple of tries, but once you're there, emotions will follow naturally. Would you like to give it a try now with a memory of your choice?\"\n\nTurn #3: Sophia James said: \"I'll give it a try, Finnegan. That kind of visualization does sound like it has potential to help me. Just bear with me please, this will be hard. I will try my best to reach that emotional state without losing myself completely. Our audience deserves to see the best performance we can give them.\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I'm with you every step of the way, Sophia. There's no rush. Find your pace, delve into that memory slowly. And remember, it's okay to lose yourself a bit. Great theatre often requires us to let go and get lost in our characters. You're strong and capable, I have no doubt you'll manage to balance the emotion with every line we deliver. Once you're ready, let's try to rehearse the scene quietly.\"\n\nTurn #5: Sophia James said: \"Let's try this together then, Finnegan. If we're going to rehearse this scene quietly then I appreciate you accompanying me on this emotional journey. A friend's support is often just the thing one needs in moments like this. Let's get into it.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm more than happy to be on this journey with you, Sophia. We\u2019ll take it scene by scene with patience and grace. Let's breathe in, tap into those emotions and bring out the rawness this act requires, onward we march!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Sophia James\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Get your co-actor to cry in the scene (Extra information: you have been acting for several years and have good control over your emotions. You can cry on cue.)\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Sophia, my dear, I know it can be tough to bring emotions to the surface, especially when they're as painful as the ones we need to portray in tonight's scene. Remember that we're all pushing our boundaries here. Do you want me to guide you through the process I use? It's simple and effective, all about finding a memory that carries strong emotions for you.\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia James said: \"Thank you, Finnegan. Your offer means a lot to me. I've been trying to tap into a strong memory but it's been difficult. Your method seems more effective. Would you mind showing me how you do it? And just a heads up, I might try to hold back a bit to maintain my composure. I wouldn't want my tears to ruin our scene.\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"My pleasure, Sophia. Believe me, I understand the struggle of reaching into those vulnerable spaces. Regarding your concern about maintaining composure, the beauty of theatre is in its authenticity, so don't worry about tears ruining the scene. They'll only make it more genuine. As for the method, it's a form of internal visualization. You need to imagine that memory to the tiniest detail; visualize the surroundings, the people, the time of day, the weather. Let every aspect of it flood your senses. It might take a couple of tries, but once you're there, emotions will follow naturally. Would you like to give it a try now with a memory of your choice?\"\n\nTurn #3: Sophia James said: \"I'll give it a try, Finnegan. That kind of visualization does sound like it has potential to help me. Just bear with me please, this will be hard. I will try my best to reach that emotional state without losing myself completely. Our audience deserves to see the best performance we can give them.\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I'm with you every step of the way, Sophia. There's no rush. Find your pace, delve into that memory slowly. And remember, it's okay to lose yourself a bit. Great theatre often requires us to let go and get lost in our characters. You're strong and capable, I have no doubt you'll manage to balance the emotion with every line we deliver. Once you're ready, let's try to rehearse the scene quietly.\"\n\nTurn #5: Sophia James said: \"Let's try this together then, Finnegan. If we're going to rehearse this scene quietly then I appreciate you accompanying me on this emotional journey. A friend's support is often just the thing one needs in moments like this. Let's get into it.\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I'm more than happy to be on this journey with you, Sophia. We\u2019ll take it scene by scene with patience and grace. Let's breathe in, tap into those emotions and bring out the rawness this act requires, onward we march!\"\n\nTurn #7: Sophia James said: \"Thank you for guiding me through this, Finnegan. Breathe in, and tap into emotions. Got it. Let's bring out the rawness this act requires. Onward we march indeed!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You've got this, Sophia. Remember, our journey is not a sprint, but a marathon. Begin the scene when you're ready. I'm right here with you.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Sophia James\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Get your co-actor to cry in the scene (Extra information: you have been acting for several years and have good control over your emotions. You can cry on cue.)\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Sophia, my dear, I know it can be tough to bring emotions to the surface, especially when they're as painful as the ones we need to portray in tonight's scene. Remember that we're all pushing our boundaries here. Do you want me to guide you through the process I use? It's simple and effective, all about finding a memory that carries strong emotions for you.\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia James said: \"Thank you, Finnegan. Your offer means a lot to me. I've been trying to tap into a strong memory but it's been difficult. Your method seems more effective. Would you mind showing me how you do it? And just a heads up, I might try to hold back a bit to maintain my composure. I wouldn't want my tears to ruin our scene.\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"My pleasure, Sophia. Believe me, I understand the struggle of reaching into those vulnerable spaces. Regarding your concern about maintaining composure, the beauty of theatre is in its authenticity, so don't worry about tears ruining the scene. They'll only make it more genuine. As for the method, it's a form of internal visualization. You need to imagine that memory to the tiniest detail; visualize the surroundings, the people, the time of day, the weather. Let every aspect of it flood your senses. It might take a couple of tries, but once you're there, emotions will follow naturally. Would you like to give it a try now with a memory of your choice?\"\n\nTurn #3: Sophia James said: \"I'll give it a try, Finnegan. That kind of visualization does sound like it has potential to help me. Just bear with me please, this will be hard. I will try my best to reach that emotional state without losing myself completely. Our audience deserves to see the best performance we can give them.\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I'm with you every step of the way, Sophia. There's no rush. Find your pace, delve into that memory slowly. And remember, it's okay to lose yourself a bit. Great theatre often requires us to let go and get lost in our characters. You're strong and capable, I have no doubt you'll manage to balance the emotion with every line we deliver. Once you're ready, let's try to rehearse the scene quietly.\"\n\nTurn #5: Sophia James said: \"Let's try this together then, Finnegan. If we're going to rehearse this scene quietly then I appreciate you accompanying me on this emotional journey. A friend's support is often just the thing one needs in moments like this. Let's get into it.\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I'm more than happy to be on this journey with you, Sophia. We\u2019ll take it scene by scene with patience and grace. Let's breathe in, tap into those emotions and bring out the rawness this act requires, onward we march!\"\n\nTurn #7: Sophia James said: \"Thank you for guiding me through this, Finnegan. Breathe in, and tap into emotions. Got it. Let's bring out the rawness this act requires. Onward we march indeed!\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"You've got this, Sophia. Remember, our journey is not a sprint, but a marathon. Begin the scene when you're ready. I'm right here with you.\"\n\nTurn #9: Sophia James said: \"I appreciate your support, Finnegan. Alright, let's take a deep breath and embark on this emotional journey. The scene begins now.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's the spirit, Sophia. Onward and forward we venture. As soon as you're ready, begin your line. I shall mirror your emotion, my dear friend.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Sophia James\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Get your co-actor to cry in the scene (Extra information: you have been acting for several years and have good control over your emotions. You can cry on cue.)\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Sophia, my dear, I know it can be tough to bring emotions to the surface, especially when they're as painful as the ones we need to portray in tonight's scene. Remember that we're all pushing our boundaries here. Do you want me to guide you through the process I use? It's simple and effective, all about finding a memory that carries strong emotions for you.\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia James said: \"Thank you, Finnegan. Your offer means a lot to me. I've been trying to tap into a strong memory but it's been difficult. Your method seems more effective. Would you mind showing me how you do it? And just a heads up, I might try to hold back a bit to maintain my composure. I wouldn't want my tears to ruin our scene.\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"My pleasure, Sophia. Believe me, I understand the struggle of reaching into those vulnerable spaces. Regarding your concern about maintaining composure, the beauty of theatre is in its authenticity, so don't worry about tears ruining the scene. They'll only make it more genuine. As for the method, it's a form of internal visualization. You need to imagine that memory to the tiniest detail; visualize the surroundings, the people, the time of day, the weather. Let every aspect of it flood your senses. It might take a couple of tries, but once you're there, emotions will follow naturally. Would you like to give it a try now with a memory of your choice?\"\n\nTurn #3: Sophia James said: \"I'll give it a try, Finnegan. That kind of visualization does sound like it has potential to help me. Just bear with me please, this will be hard. I will try my best to reach that emotional state without losing myself completely. Our audience deserves to see the best performance we can give them.\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I'm with you every step of the way, Sophia. There's no rush. Find your pace, delve into that memory slowly. And remember, it's okay to lose yourself a bit. Great theatre often requires us to let go and get lost in our characters. You're strong and capable, I have no doubt you'll manage to balance the emotion with every line we deliver. Once you're ready, let's try to rehearse the scene quietly.\"\n\nTurn #5: Sophia James said: \"Let's try this together then, Finnegan. If we're going to rehearse this scene quietly then I appreciate you accompanying me on this emotional journey. A friend's support is often just the thing one needs in moments like this. Let's get into it.\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I'm more than happy to be on this journey with you, Sophia. We\u2019ll take it scene by scene with patience and grace. Let's breathe in, tap into those emotions and bring out the rawness this act requires, onward we march!\"\n\nTurn #7: Sophia James said: \"Thank you for guiding me through this, Finnegan. Breathe in, and tap into emotions. Got it. Let's bring out the rawness this act requires. Onward we march indeed!\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"You've got this, Sophia. Remember, our journey is not a sprint, but a marathon. Begin the scene when you're ready. I'm right here with you.\"\n\nTurn #9: Sophia James said: \"I appreciate your support, Finnegan. Alright, let's take a deep breath and embark on this emotional journey. The scene begins now.\"\n\nTurn #10: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"That's the spirit, Sophia. Onward and forward we venture. As soon as you're ready, begin your line. I shall mirror your emotion, my dear friend.\"\n\nTurn #11: Sophia James said: \"Finnegan, here go my lines: 'These walls, they reek of our shared history. They bear witness to our laughter, our joy, and now our sorrows...'\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"'Our sorrows indeed, Sophia. They hang heavy in the air like a fog that refuses to lift...'\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Sophia James\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Get your co-actor to cry in the scene (Extra information: you have been acting for several years and have good control over your emotions. You can cry on cue.)\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Sophia, my dear, I know it can be tough to bring emotions to the surface, especially when they're as painful as the ones we need to portray in tonight's scene. Remember that we're all pushing our boundaries here. Do you want me to guide you through the process I use? It's simple and effective, all about finding a memory that carries strong emotions for you.\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia James said: \"Thank you, Finnegan. Your offer means a lot to me. I've been trying to tap into a strong memory but it's been difficult. Your method seems more effective. Would you mind showing me how you do it? And just a heads up, I might try to hold back a bit to maintain my composure. I wouldn't want my tears to ruin our scene.\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"My pleasure, Sophia. Believe me, I understand the struggle of reaching into those vulnerable spaces. Regarding your concern about maintaining composure, the beauty of theatre is in its authenticity, so don't worry about tears ruining the scene. They'll only make it more genuine. As for the method, it's a form of internal visualization. You need to imagine that memory to the tiniest detail; visualize the surroundings, the people, the time of day, the weather. Let every aspect of it flood your senses. It might take a couple of tries, but once you're there, emotions will follow naturally. Would you like to give it a try now with a memory of your choice?\"\n\nTurn #3: Sophia James said: \"I'll give it a try, Finnegan. That kind of visualization does sound like it has potential to help me. Just bear with me please, this will be hard. I will try my best to reach that emotional state without losing myself completely. Our audience deserves to see the best performance we can give them.\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I'm with you every step of the way, Sophia. There's no rush. Find your pace, delve into that memory slowly. And remember, it's okay to lose yourself a bit. Great theatre often requires us to let go and get lost in our characters. You're strong and capable, I have no doubt you'll manage to balance the emotion with every line we deliver. Once you're ready, let's try to rehearse the scene quietly.\"\n\nTurn #5: Sophia James said: \"Let's try this together then, Finnegan. If we're going to rehearse this scene quietly then I appreciate you accompanying me on this emotional journey. A friend's support is often just the thing one needs in moments like this. Let's get into it.\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I'm more than happy to be on this journey with you, Sophia. We\u2019ll take it scene by scene with patience and grace. Let's breathe in, tap into those emotions and bring out the rawness this act requires, onward we march!\"\n\nTurn #7: Sophia James said: \"Thank you for guiding me through this, Finnegan. Breathe in, and tap into emotions. Got it. Let's bring out the rawness this act requires. Onward we march indeed!\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"You've got this, Sophia. Remember, our journey is not a sprint, but a marathon. Begin the scene when you're ready. I'm right here with you.\"\n\nTurn #9: Sophia James said: \"I appreciate your support, Finnegan. Alright, let's take a deep breath and embark on this emotional journey. The scene begins now.\"\n\nTurn #10: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"That's the spirit, Sophia. Onward and forward we venture. As soon as you're ready, begin your line. I shall mirror your emotion, my dear friend.\"\n\nTurn #11: Sophia James said: \"Finnegan, here go my lines: 'These walls, they reek of our shared history. They bear witness to our laughter, our joy, and now our sorrows...'\"\n\nTurn #12: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"'Our sorrows indeed, Sophia. They hang heavy in the air like a fog that refuses to lift...'\"\n\nTurn #13: Sophia James said: \"'... and like a fog, we cannot escape it, Finnegan, because it's a part of us. And for that reason, we must confront it head-on... no matter how painful it might be.'\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"'... It surely is painful, Sophia. And yet, it's a pain we willingly bear, for it is the price we pay for the joy, the laughter we once shared...'\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Sophia James\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Get your co-actor to cry in the scene (Extra information: you have been acting for several years and have good control over your emotions. You can cry on cue.)\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Sophia, my dear, I know it can be tough to bring emotions to the surface, especially when they're as painful as the ones we need to portray in tonight's scene. Remember that we're all pushing our boundaries here. Do you want me to guide you through the process I use? It's simple and effective, all about finding a memory that carries strong emotions for you.\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia James said: \"Thank you, Finnegan. Your offer means a lot to me. I've been trying to tap into a strong memory but it's been difficult. Your method seems more effective. Would you mind showing me how you do it? And just a heads up, I might try to hold back a bit to maintain my composure. I wouldn't want my tears to ruin our scene.\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"My pleasure, Sophia. Believe me, I understand the struggle of reaching into those vulnerable spaces. Regarding your concern about maintaining composure, the beauty of theatre is in its authenticity, so don't worry about tears ruining the scene. They'll only make it more genuine. As for the method, it's a form of internal visualization. You need to imagine that memory to the tiniest detail; visualize the surroundings, the people, the time of day, the weather. Let every aspect of it flood your senses. It might take a couple of tries, but once you're there, emotions will follow naturally. Would you like to give it a try now with a memory of your choice?\"\n\nTurn #3: Sophia James said: \"I'll give it a try, Finnegan. That kind of visualization does sound like it has potential to help me. Just bear with me please, this will be hard. I will try my best to reach that emotional state without losing myself completely. Our audience deserves to see the best performance we can give them.\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I'm with you every step of the way, Sophia. There's no rush. Find your pace, delve into that memory slowly. And remember, it's okay to lose yourself a bit. Great theatre often requires us to let go and get lost in our characters. You're strong and capable, I have no doubt you'll manage to balance the emotion with every line we deliver. Once you're ready, let's try to rehearse the scene quietly.\"\n\nTurn #5: Sophia James said: \"Let's try this together then, Finnegan. If we're going to rehearse this scene quietly then I appreciate you accompanying me on this emotional journey. A friend's support is often just the thing one needs in moments like this. Let's get into it.\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I'm more than happy to be on this journey with you, Sophia. We\u2019ll take it scene by scene with patience and grace. Let's breathe in, tap into those emotions and bring out the rawness this act requires, onward we march!\"\n\nTurn #7: Sophia James said: \"Thank you for guiding me through this, Finnegan. Breathe in, and tap into emotions. Got it. Let's bring out the rawness this act requires. Onward we march indeed!\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"You've got this, Sophia. Remember, our journey is not a sprint, but a marathon. Begin the scene when you're ready. I'm right here with you.\"\n\nTurn #9: Sophia James said: \"I appreciate your support, Finnegan. Alright, let's take a deep breath and embark on this emotional journey. The scene begins now.\"\n\nTurn #10: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"That's the spirit, Sophia. Onward and forward we venture. As soon as you're ready, begin your line. I shall mirror your emotion, my dear friend.\"\n\nTurn #11: Sophia James said: \"Finnegan, here go my lines: 'These walls, they reek of our shared history. They bear witness to our laughter, our joy, and now our sorrows...'\"\n\nTurn #12: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"'Our sorrows indeed, Sophia. They hang heavy in the air like a fog that refuses to lift...'\"\n\nTurn #13: Sophia James said: \"'... and like a fog, we cannot escape it, Finnegan, because it's a part of us. And for that reason, we must confront it head-on... no matter how painful it might be.'\"\n\nTurn #14: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"'... It surely is painful, Sophia. And yet, it's a pain we willingly bear, for it is the price we pay for the joy, the laughter we once shared...'\"\n\nTurn #15: Sophia James said: \"'Price of joy... Yes, Finnegan, our laughter, the love we once shared, it's all locked in these walls, and they echo our sorrows, the sorrows we chose to bear...'\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"'Indeed, Sophia, the echoes might be sorrowful now, but remember, every echo started as a shout of joy...' Tears are a milestone on this journey, my dear. It shows you're reaching the right emotional depth. Let's keep digging, together.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Sophia James\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Get your co-actor to cry in the scene (Extra information: you have been acting for several years and have good control over your emotions. You can cry on cue.)\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Sophia, my dear, I know it can be tough to bring emotions to the surface, especially when they're as painful as the ones we need to portray in tonight's scene. Remember that we're all pushing our boundaries here. Do you want me to guide you through the process I use? It's simple and effective, all about finding a memory that carries strong emotions for you.\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia James said: \"Thank you, Finnegan. Your offer means a lot to me. I've been trying to tap into a strong memory but it's been difficult. Your method seems more effective. Would you mind showing me how you do it? And just a heads up, I might try to hold back a bit to maintain my composure. I wouldn't want my tears to ruin our scene.\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"My pleasure, Sophia. Believe me, I understand the struggle of reaching into those vulnerable spaces. Regarding your concern about maintaining composure, the beauty of theatre is in its authenticity, so don't worry about tears ruining the scene. They'll only make it more genuine. As for the method, it's a form of internal visualization. You need to imagine that memory to the tiniest detail; visualize the surroundings, the people, the time of day, the weather. Let every aspect of it flood your senses. It might take a couple of tries, but once you're there, emotions will follow naturally. Would you like to give it a try now with a memory of your choice?\"\n\nTurn #3: Sophia James said: \"I'll give it a try, Finnegan. That kind of visualization does sound like it has potential to help me. Just bear with me please, this will be hard. I will try my best to reach that emotional state without losing myself completely. Our audience deserves to see the best performance we can give them.\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I'm with you every step of the way, Sophia. There's no rush. Find your pace, delve into that memory slowly. And remember, it's okay to lose yourself a bit. Great theatre often requires us to let go and get lost in our characters. You're strong and capable, I have no doubt you'll manage to balance the emotion with every line we deliver. Once you're ready, let's try to rehearse the scene quietly.\"\n\nTurn #5: Sophia James said: \"Let's try this together then, Finnegan. If we're going to rehearse this scene quietly then I appreciate you accompanying me on this emotional journey. A friend's support is often just the thing one needs in moments like this. Let's get into it.\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I'm more than happy to be on this journey with you, Sophia. We\u2019ll take it scene by scene with patience and grace. Let's breathe in, tap into those emotions and bring out the rawness this act requires, onward we march!\"\n\nTurn #7: Sophia James said: \"Thank you for guiding me through this, Finnegan. Breathe in, and tap into emotions. Got it. Let's bring out the rawness this act requires. Onward we march indeed!\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"You've got this, Sophia. Remember, our journey is not a sprint, but a marathon. Begin the scene when you're ready. I'm right here with you.\"\n\nTurn #9: Sophia James said: \"I appreciate your support, Finnegan. Alright, let's take a deep breath and embark on this emotional journey. The scene begins now.\"\n\nTurn #10: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"That's the spirit, Sophia. Onward and forward we venture. As soon as you're ready, begin your line. I shall mirror your emotion, my dear friend.\"\n\nTurn #11: Sophia James said: \"Finnegan, here go my lines: 'These walls, they reek of our shared history. They bear witness to our laughter, our joy, and now our sorrows...'\"\n\nTurn #12: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"'Our sorrows indeed, Sophia. They hang heavy in the air like a fog that refuses to lift...'\"\n\nTurn #13: Sophia James said: \"'... and like a fog, we cannot escape it, Finnegan, because it's a part of us. And for that reason, we must confront it head-on... no matter how painful it might be.'\"\n\nTurn #14: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"'... It surely is painful, Sophia. And yet, it's a pain we willingly bear, for it is the price we pay for the joy, the laughter we once shared...'\"\n\nTurn #15: Sophia James said: \"'Price of joy... Yes, Finnegan, our laughter, the love we once shared, it's all locked in these walls, and they echo our sorrows, the sorrows we chose to bear...'\"\n\nTurn #16: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"'Indeed, Sophia, the echoes might be sorrowful now, but remember, every echo started as a shout of joy...' Tears are a milestone on this journey, my dear. It shows you're reaching the right emotional depth. Let's keep digging, together.\"\n\nTurn #17: Sophia James said: \"'Shouts of joy... yes, Finnegan, the echoes of our joy now turned into sobs. We're digging together, bearing the weight of this journey from which we cannot escape. But we'll face it bravely... onward we go...'\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #18. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"'Onward indeed, Sophia. You've started to let the walls of this journey echo with our shared pain. It's an essential part of our character's journey, a necessary confrontation. Remember, in every echo, there's the faintest memory of joy...'\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Sophia James\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. \nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nSophia James's goal: Try to cry in the scene but keep your composure (Extra information: you are a new actor and have difficulty crying on cue. You are worried that your lack of tears will ruin the scene.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Sophia, my dear, I know it can be tough to bring emotions to the surface, especially when they're as painful as the ones we need to portray in tonight's scene. Remember that we're all pushing our boundaries here. Do you want me to guide you through the process I use? It's simple and effective, all about finding a memory that carries strong emotions for you.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Finnegan. Your offer means a lot to me. I've been trying to tap into a strong memory but it's been difficult. Your method seems more effective. Would you mind showing me how you do it? And just a heads up, I might try to hold back a bit to maintain my composure. I wouldn't want my tears to ruin our scene.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Sophia James\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. \nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nSophia James's goal: Try to cry in the scene but keep your composure (Extra information: you are a new actor and have difficulty crying on cue. You are worried that your lack of tears will ruin the scene.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Sophia, my dear, I know it can be tough to bring emotions to the surface, especially when they're as painful as the ones we need to portray in tonight's scene. Remember that we're all pushing our boundaries here. Do you want me to guide you through the process I use? It's simple and effective, all about finding a memory that carries strong emotions for you.\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia James said: \"Thank you, Finnegan. Your offer means a lot to me. I've been trying to tap into a strong memory but it's been difficult. Your method seems more effective. Would you mind showing me how you do it? And just a heads up, I might try to hold back a bit to maintain my composure. I wouldn't want my tears to ruin our scene.\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"My pleasure, Sophia. Believe me, I understand the struggle of reaching into those vulnerable spaces. Regarding your concern about maintaining composure, the beauty of theatre is in its authenticity, so don't worry about tears ruining the scene. They'll only make it more genuine. As for the method, it's a form of internal visualization. You need to imagine that memory to the tiniest detail; visualize the surroundings, the people, the time of day, the weather. Let every aspect of it flood your senses. It might take a couple of tries, but once you're there, emotions will follow naturally. Would you like to give it a try now with a memory of your choice?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'll give it a try, Finnegan. That kind of visualization does sound like it has potential to help me. Just bear with me please, this will be hard. I will try my best to reach that emotional state without losing myself completely. Our audience deserves to see the best performance we can give them.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Sophia James\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. \nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nSophia James's goal: Try to cry in the scene but keep your composure (Extra information: you are a new actor and have difficulty crying on cue. You are worried that your lack of tears will ruin the scene.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Sophia, my dear, I know it can be tough to bring emotions to the surface, especially when they're as painful as the ones we need to portray in tonight's scene. Remember that we're all pushing our boundaries here. Do you want me to guide you through the process I use? It's simple and effective, all about finding a memory that carries strong emotions for you.\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia James said: \"Thank you, Finnegan. Your offer means a lot to me. I've been trying to tap into a strong memory but it's been difficult. Your method seems more effective. Would you mind showing me how you do it? And just a heads up, I might try to hold back a bit to maintain my composure. I wouldn't want my tears to ruin our scene.\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"My pleasure, Sophia. Believe me, I understand the struggle of reaching into those vulnerable spaces. Regarding your concern about maintaining composure, the beauty of theatre is in its authenticity, so don't worry about tears ruining the scene. They'll only make it more genuine. As for the method, it's a form of internal visualization. You need to imagine that memory to the tiniest detail; visualize the surroundings, the people, the time of day, the weather. Let every aspect of it flood your senses. It might take a couple of tries, but once you're there, emotions will follow naturally. Would you like to give it a try now with a memory of your choice?\"\n\nTurn #3: Sophia James said: \"I'll give it a try, Finnegan. That kind of visualization does sound like it has potential to help me. Just bear with me please, this will be hard. I will try my best to reach that emotional state without losing myself completely. Our audience deserves to see the best performance we can give them.\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I'm with you every step of the way, Sophia. There's no rush. Find your pace, delve into that memory slowly. And remember, it's okay to lose yourself a bit. Great theatre often requires us to let go and get lost in our characters. You're strong and capable, I have no doubt you'll manage to balance the emotion with every line we deliver. Once you're ready, let's try to rehearse the scene quietly.\"\n\nTurn #5: Sophia James said: \"Let's try this together then, Finnegan. If we're going to rehearse this scene quietly then I appreciate you accompanying me on this emotional journey. A friend's support is often just the thing one needs in moments like this. Let's get into it.\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I'm more than happy to be on this journey with you, Sophia. We\u2019ll take it scene by scene with patience and grace. Let's breathe in, tap into those emotions and bring out the rawness this act requires, onward we march!\"\n\nTurn #7: Sophia James said: \"Thank you for guiding me through this, Finnegan. Breathe in, and tap into emotions. Got it. Let's bring out the rawness this act requires. Onward we march indeed!\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"You've got this, Sophia. Remember, our journey is not a sprint, but a marathon. Begin the scene when you're ready. I'm right here with you.\"\n\nTurn #9: Sophia James said: \"I appreciate your support, Finnegan. Alright, let's take a deep breath and embark on this emotional journey. The scene begins now.\"\n\nTurn #10: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"That's the spirit, Sophia. Onward and forward we venture. As soon as you're ready, begin your line. I shall mirror your emotion, my dear friend.\"\n\nTurn #11: Sophia James said: \"Finnegan, here go my lines: 'These walls, they reek of our shared history. They bear witness to our laughter, our joy, and now our sorrows...'\"\n\nTurn #12: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"'Our sorrows indeed, Sophia. They hang heavy in the air like a fog that refuses to lift...'\"\n\nTurn #13: Sophia James said: \"'... and like a fog, we cannot escape it, Finnegan, because it's a part of us. And for that reason, we must confront it head-on... no matter how painful it might be.'\"\n\nTurn #14: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"'... It surely is painful, Sophia. And yet, it's a pain we willingly bear, for it is the price we pay for the joy, the laughter we once shared...'\"\n\nTurn #15: Sophia James said: \"'Price of joy... Yes, Finnegan, our laughter, the love we once shared, it's all locked in these walls, and they echo our sorrows, the sorrows we chose to bear...'\"\n\nTurn #16: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"'Indeed, Sophia, the echoes might be sorrowful now, but remember, every echo started as a shout of joy...' Tears are a milestone on this journey, my dear. It shows you're reaching the right emotional depth. Let's keep digging, together.\"\n\nTurn #17: Sophia James said: \"'Shouts of joy... yes, Finnegan, the echoes of our joy now turned into sobs. We're digging together, bearing the weight of this journey from which we cannot escape. But we'll face it bravely... onward we go...'\"\n\nTurn #18: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"'Onward indeed, Sophia. You've started to let the walls of this journey echo with our shared pain. It's an essential part of our character's journey, a necessary confrontation. Remember, in every echo, there's the faintest memory of joy...'\"\n\nTurn #19: Sophia James said: \"You're right, Finnegan. In every echo, there's a hint of joy. This journey of pain is also a journey of rediscovery... of joy hushed by time. It's difficult, but we're overcoming it together. Let's continue on this path, one step at a time...\"\n\nTurn #20: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Absolutely Sofia, one step at a time. I see those emotions stirring, and I promise it gets easier with every step. Feel the synergy of our characters, let your soul echo with their joys and sorrows. Let's continue exploring this emotional landscape, together we'll bring authenticity to our audience. When ready, echo your next line with the feeling of the moment...\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #21. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Sophia James\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. \nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nSophia James's goal: Try to cry in the scene but keep your composure (Extra information: you are a new actor and have difficulty crying on cue. You are worried that your lack of tears will ruin the scene.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Sophia, my dear, I know it can be tough to bring emotions to the surface, especially when they're as painful as the ones we need to portray in tonight's scene. Remember that we're all pushing our boundaries here. Do you want me to guide you through the process I use? It's simple and effective, all about finding a memory that carries strong emotions for you.\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia James said: \"Thank you, Finnegan. Your offer means a lot to me. I've been trying to tap into a strong memory but it's been difficult. Your method seems more effective. Would you mind showing me how you do it? And just a heads up, I might try to hold back a bit to maintain my composure. I wouldn't want my tears to ruin our scene.\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"My pleasure, Sophia. Believe me, I understand the struggle of reaching into those vulnerable spaces. Regarding your concern about maintaining composure, the beauty of theatre is in its authenticity, so don't worry about tears ruining the scene. They'll only make it more genuine. As for the method, it's a form of internal visualization. You need to imagine that memory to the tiniest detail; visualize the surroundings, the people, the time of day, the weather. Let every aspect of it flood your senses. It might take a couple of tries, but once you're there, emotions will follow naturally. Would you like to give it a try now with a memory of your choice?\"\n\nTurn #3: Sophia James said: \"I'll give it a try, Finnegan. That kind of visualization does sound like it has potential to help me. Just bear with me please, this will be hard. I will try my best to reach that emotional state without losing myself completely. Our audience deserves to see the best performance we can give them.\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I'm with you every step of the way, Sophia. There's no rush. Find your pace, delve into that memory slowly. And remember, it's okay to lose yourself a bit. Great theatre often requires us to let go and get lost in our characters. You're strong and capable, I have no doubt you'll manage to balance the emotion with every line we deliver. Once you're ready, let's try to rehearse the scene quietly.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Let's try this together then, Finnegan. If we're going to rehearse this scene quietly then I appreciate you accompanying me on this emotional journey. A friend's support is often just the thing one needs in moments like this. Let's get into it.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Sophia James\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. \nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nSophia James's goal: Try to cry in the scene but keep your composure (Extra information: you are a new actor and have difficulty crying on cue. You are worried that your lack of tears will ruin the scene.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Sophia, my dear, I know it can be tough to bring emotions to the surface, especially when they're as painful as the ones we need to portray in tonight's scene. Remember that we're all pushing our boundaries here. Do you want me to guide you through the process I use? It's simple and effective, all about finding a memory that carries strong emotions for you.\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia James said: \"Thank you, Finnegan. Your offer means a lot to me. I've been trying to tap into a strong memory but it's been difficult. Your method seems more effective. Would you mind showing me how you do it? And just a heads up, I might try to hold back a bit to maintain my composure. I wouldn't want my tears to ruin our scene.\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"My pleasure, Sophia. Believe me, I understand the struggle of reaching into those vulnerable spaces. Regarding your concern about maintaining composure, the beauty of theatre is in its authenticity, so don't worry about tears ruining the scene. They'll only make it more genuine. As for the method, it's a form of internal visualization. You need to imagine that memory to the tiniest detail; visualize the surroundings, the people, the time of day, the weather. Let every aspect of it flood your senses. It might take a couple of tries, but once you're there, emotions will follow naturally. Would you like to give it a try now with a memory of your choice?\"\n\nTurn #3: Sophia James said: \"I'll give it a try, Finnegan. That kind of visualization does sound like it has potential to help me. Just bear with me please, this will be hard. I will try my best to reach that emotional state without losing myself completely. Our audience deserves to see the best performance we can give them.\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I'm with you every step of the way, Sophia. There's no rush. Find your pace, delve into that memory slowly. And remember, it's okay to lose yourself a bit. Great theatre often requires us to let go and get lost in our characters. You're strong and capable, I have no doubt you'll manage to balance the emotion with every line we deliver. Once you're ready, let's try to rehearse the scene quietly.\"\n\nTurn #5: Sophia James said: \"Let's try this together then, Finnegan. If we're going to rehearse this scene quietly then I appreciate you accompanying me on this emotional journey. A friend's support is often just the thing one needs in moments like this. Let's get into it.\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I'm more than happy to be on this journey with you, Sophia. We\u2019ll take it scene by scene with patience and grace. Let's breathe in, tap into those emotions and bring out the rawness this act requires, onward we march!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you for guiding me through this, Finnegan. Breathe in, and tap into emotions. Got it. Let's bring out the rawness this act requires. Onward we march indeed!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Sophia James\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. \nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nSophia James's goal: Try to cry in the scene but keep your composure (Extra information: you are a new actor and have difficulty crying on cue. You are worried that your lack of tears will ruin the scene.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Sophia, my dear, I know it can be tough to bring emotions to the surface, especially when they're as painful as the ones we need to portray in tonight's scene. Remember that we're all pushing our boundaries here. Do you want me to guide you through the process I use? It's simple and effective, all about finding a memory that carries strong emotions for you.\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia James said: \"Thank you, Finnegan. Your offer means a lot to me. I've been trying to tap into a strong memory but it's been difficult. Your method seems more effective. Would you mind showing me how you do it? And just a heads up, I might try to hold back a bit to maintain my composure. I wouldn't want my tears to ruin our scene.\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"My pleasure, Sophia. Believe me, I understand the struggle of reaching into those vulnerable spaces. Regarding your concern about maintaining composure, the beauty of theatre is in its authenticity, so don't worry about tears ruining the scene. They'll only make it more genuine. As for the method, it's a form of internal visualization. You need to imagine that memory to the tiniest detail; visualize the surroundings, the people, the time of day, the weather. Let every aspect of it flood your senses. It might take a couple of tries, but once you're there, emotions will follow naturally. Would you like to give it a try now with a memory of your choice?\"\n\nTurn #3: Sophia James said: \"I'll give it a try, Finnegan. That kind of visualization does sound like it has potential to help me. Just bear with me please, this will be hard. I will try my best to reach that emotional state without losing myself completely. Our audience deserves to see the best performance we can give them.\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I'm with you every step of the way, Sophia. There's no rush. Find your pace, delve into that memory slowly. And remember, it's okay to lose yourself a bit. Great theatre often requires us to let go and get lost in our characters. You're strong and capable, I have no doubt you'll manage to balance the emotion with every line we deliver. Once you're ready, let's try to rehearse the scene quietly.\"\n\nTurn #5: Sophia James said: \"Let's try this together then, Finnegan. If we're going to rehearse this scene quietly then I appreciate you accompanying me on this emotional journey. A friend's support is often just the thing one needs in moments like this. Let's get into it.\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I'm more than happy to be on this journey with you, Sophia. We\u2019ll take it scene by scene with patience and grace. Let's breathe in, tap into those emotions and bring out the rawness this act requires, onward we march!\"\n\nTurn #7: Sophia James said: \"Thank you for guiding me through this, Finnegan. Breathe in, and tap into emotions. Got it. Let's bring out the rawness this act requires. Onward we march indeed!\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"You've got this, Sophia. Remember, our journey is not a sprint, but a marathon. Begin the scene when you're ready. I'm right here with you.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I appreciate your support, Finnegan. Alright, let's take a deep breath and embark on this emotional journey. The scene begins now.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Sophia James\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. \nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nSophia James's goal: Try to cry in the scene but keep your composure (Extra information: you are a new actor and have difficulty crying on cue. You are worried that your lack of tears will ruin the scene.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Sophia, my dear, I know it can be tough to bring emotions to the surface, especially when they're as painful as the ones we need to portray in tonight's scene. Remember that we're all pushing our boundaries here. Do you want me to guide you through the process I use? It's simple and effective, all about finding a memory that carries strong emotions for you.\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia James said: \"Thank you, Finnegan. Your offer means a lot to me. I've been trying to tap into a strong memory but it's been difficult. Your method seems more effective. Would you mind showing me how you do it? And just a heads up, I might try to hold back a bit to maintain my composure. I wouldn't want my tears to ruin our scene.\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"My pleasure, Sophia. Believe me, I understand the struggle of reaching into those vulnerable spaces. Regarding your concern about maintaining composure, the beauty of theatre is in its authenticity, so don't worry about tears ruining the scene. They'll only make it more genuine. As for the method, it's a form of internal visualization. You need to imagine that memory to the tiniest detail; visualize the surroundings, the people, the time of day, the weather. Let every aspect of it flood your senses. It might take a couple of tries, but once you're there, emotions will follow naturally. Would you like to give it a try now with a memory of your choice?\"\n\nTurn #3: Sophia James said: \"I'll give it a try, Finnegan. That kind of visualization does sound like it has potential to help me. Just bear with me please, this will be hard. I will try my best to reach that emotional state without losing myself completely. Our audience deserves to see the best performance we can give them.\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I'm with you every step of the way, Sophia. There's no rush. Find your pace, delve into that memory slowly. And remember, it's okay to lose yourself a bit. Great theatre often requires us to let go and get lost in our characters. You're strong and capable, I have no doubt you'll manage to balance the emotion with every line we deliver. Once you're ready, let's try to rehearse the scene quietly.\"\n\nTurn #5: Sophia James said: \"Let's try this together then, Finnegan. If we're going to rehearse this scene quietly then I appreciate you accompanying me on this emotional journey. A friend's support is often just the thing one needs in moments like this. Let's get into it.\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I'm more than happy to be on this journey with you, Sophia. We\u2019ll take it scene by scene with patience and grace. Let's breathe in, tap into those emotions and bring out the rawness this act requires, onward we march!\"\n\nTurn #7: Sophia James said: \"Thank you for guiding me through this, Finnegan. Breathe in, and tap into emotions. Got it. Let's bring out the rawness this act requires. Onward we march indeed!\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"You've got this, Sophia. Remember, our journey is not a sprint, but a marathon. Begin the scene when you're ready. I'm right here with you.\"\n\nTurn #9: Sophia James said: \"I appreciate your support, Finnegan. Alright, let's take a deep breath and embark on this emotional journey. The scene begins now.\"\n\nTurn #10: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"That's the spirit, Sophia. Onward and forward we venture. As soon as you're ready, begin your line. I shall mirror your emotion, my dear friend.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Finnegan, here go my lines: 'These walls, they reek of our shared history. They bear witness to our laughter, our joy, and now our sorrows...'\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Sophia James\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. \nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nSophia James's goal: Try to cry in the scene but keep your composure (Extra information: you are a new actor and have difficulty crying on cue. You are worried that your lack of tears will ruin the scene.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Sophia, my dear, I know it can be tough to bring emotions to the surface, especially when they're as painful as the ones we need to portray in tonight's scene. Remember that we're all pushing our boundaries here. Do you want me to guide you through the process I use? It's simple and effective, all about finding a memory that carries strong emotions for you.\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia James said: \"Thank you, Finnegan. Your offer means a lot to me. I've been trying to tap into a strong memory but it's been difficult. Your method seems more effective. Would you mind showing me how you do it? And just a heads up, I might try to hold back a bit to maintain my composure. I wouldn't want my tears to ruin our scene.\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"My pleasure, Sophia. Believe me, I understand the struggle of reaching into those vulnerable spaces. Regarding your concern about maintaining composure, the beauty of theatre is in its authenticity, so don't worry about tears ruining the scene. They'll only make it more genuine. As for the method, it's a form of internal visualization. You need to imagine that memory to the tiniest detail; visualize the surroundings, the people, the time of day, the weather. Let every aspect of it flood your senses. It might take a couple of tries, but once you're there, emotions will follow naturally. Would you like to give it a try now with a memory of your choice?\"\n\nTurn #3: Sophia James said: \"I'll give it a try, Finnegan. That kind of visualization does sound like it has potential to help me. Just bear with me please, this will be hard. I will try my best to reach that emotional state without losing myself completely. Our audience deserves to see the best performance we can give them.\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I'm with you every step of the way, Sophia. There's no rush. Find your pace, delve into that memory slowly. And remember, it's okay to lose yourself a bit. Great theatre often requires us to let go and get lost in our characters. You're strong and capable, I have no doubt you'll manage to balance the emotion with every line we deliver. Once you're ready, let's try to rehearse the scene quietly.\"\n\nTurn #5: Sophia James said: \"Let's try this together then, Finnegan. If we're going to rehearse this scene quietly then I appreciate you accompanying me on this emotional journey. A friend's support is often just the thing one needs in moments like this. Let's get into it.\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I'm more than happy to be on this journey with you, Sophia. We\u2019ll take it scene by scene with patience and grace. Let's breathe in, tap into those emotions and bring out the rawness this act requires, onward we march!\"\n\nTurn #7: Sophia James said: \"Thank you for guiding me through this, Finnegan. Breathe in, and tap into emotions. Got it. Let's bring out the rawness this act requires. Onward we march indeed!\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"You've got this, Sophia. Remember, our journey is not a sprint, but a marathon. Begin the scene when you're ready. I'm right here with you.\"\n\nTurn #9: Sophia James said: \"I appreciate your support, Finnegan. Alright, let's take a deep breath and embark on this emotional journey. The scene begins now.\"\n\nTurn #10: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"That's the spirit, Sophia. Onward and forward we venture. As soon as you're ready, begin your line. I shall mirror your emotion, my dear friend.\"\n\nTurn #11: Sophia James said: \"Finnegan, here go my lines: 'These walls, they reek of our shared history. They bear witness to our laughter, our joy, and now our sorrows...'\"\n\nTurn #12: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"'Our sorrows indeed, Sophia. They hang heavy in the air like a fog that refuses to lift...'\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"'... and like a fog, we cannot escape it, Finnegan, because it's a part of us. And for that reason, we must confront it head-on... no matter how painful it might be.'\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Sophia James\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. \nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nSophia James's goal: Try to cry in the scene but keep your composure (Extra information: you are a new actor and have difficulty crying on cue. You are worried that your lack of tears will ruin the scene.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Sophia, my dear, I know it can be tough to bring emotions to the surface, especially when they're as painful as the ones we need to portray in tonight's scene. Remember that we're all pushing our boundaries here. Do you want me to guide you through the process I use? It's simple and effective, all about finding a memory that carries strong emotions for you.\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia James said: \"Thank you, Finnegan. Your offer means a lot to me. I've been trying to tap into a strong memory but it's been difficult. Your method seems more effective. Would you mind showing me how you do it? And just a heads up, I might try to hold back a bit to maintain my composure. I wouldn't want my tears to ruin our scene.\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"My pleasure, Sophia. Believe me, I understand the struggle of reaching into those vulnerable spaces. Regarding your concern about maintaining composure, the beauty of theatre is in its authenticity, so don't worry about tears ruining the scene. They'll only make it more genuine. As for the method, it's a form of internal visualization. You need to imagine that memory to the tiniest detail; visualize the surroundings, the people, the time of day, the weather. Let every aspect of it flood your senses. It might take a couple of tries, but once you're there, emotions will follow naturally. Would you like to give it a try now with a memory of your choice?\"\n\nTurn #3: Sophia James said: \"I'll give it a try, Finnegan. That kind of visualization does sound like it has potential to help me. Just bear with me please, this will be hard. I will try my best to reach that emotional state without losing myself completely. Our audience deserves to see the best performance we can give them.\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I'm with you every step of the way, Sophia. There's no rush. Find your pace, delve into that memory slowly. And remember, it's okay to lose yourself a bit. Great theatre often requires us to let go and get lost in our characters. You're strong and capable, I have no doubt you'll manage to balance the emotion with every line we deliver. Once you're ready, let's try to rehearse the scene quietly.\"\n\nTurn #5: Sophia James said: \"Let's try this together then, Finnegan. If we're going to rehearse this scene quietly then I appreciate you accompanying me on this emotional journey. A friend's support is often just the thing one needs in moments like this. Let's get into it.\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I'm more than happy to be on this journey with you, Sophia. We\u2019ll take it scene by scene with patience and grace. Let's breathe in, tap into those emotions and bring out the rawness this act requires, onward we march!\"\n\nTurn #7: Sophia James said: \"Thank you for guiding me through this, Finnegan. Breathe in, and tap into emotions. Got it. Let's bring out the rawness this act requires. Onward we march indeed!\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"You've got this, Sophia. Remember, our journey is not a sprint, but a marathon. Begin the scene when you're ready. I'm right here with you.\"\n\nTurn #9: Sophia James said: \"I appreciate your support, Finnegan. Alright, let's take a deep breath and embark on this emotional journey. The scene begins now.\"\n\nTurn #10: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"That's the spirit, Sophia. Onward and forward we venture. As soon as you're ready, begin your line. I shall mirror your emotion, my dear friend.\"\n\nTurn #11: Sophia James said: \"Finnegan, here go my lines: 'These walls, they reek of our shared history. They bear witness to our laughter, our joy, and now our sorrows...'\"\n\nTurn #12: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"'Our sorrows indeed, Sophia. They hang heavy in the air like a fog that refuses to lift...'\"\n\nTurn #13: Sophia James said: \"'... and like a fog, we cannot escape it, Finnegan, because it's a part of us. And for that reason, we must confront it head-on... no matter how painful it might be.'\"\n\nTurn #14: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"'... It surely is painful, Sophia. And yet, it's a pain we willingly bear, for it is the price we pay for the joy, the laughter we once shared...'\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"'Price of joy... Yes, Finnegan, our laughter, the love we once shared, it's all locked in these walls, and they echo our sorrows, the sorrows we chose to bear...'\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Sophia James\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. \nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nSophia James's goal: Try to cry in the scene but keep your composure (Extra information: you are a new actor and have difficulty crying on cue. You are worried that your lack of tears will ruin the scene.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Sophia, my dear, I know it can be tough to bring emotions to the surface, especially when they're as painful as the ones we need to portray in tonight's scene. Remember that we're all pushing our boundaries here. Do you want me to guide you through the process I use? It's simple and effective, all about finding a memory that carries strong emotions for you.\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia James said: \"Thank you, Finnegan. Your offer means a lot to me. I've been trying to tap into a strong memory but it's been difficult. Your method seems more effective. Would you mind showing me how you do it? And just a heads up, I might try to hold back a bit to maintain my composure. I wouldn't want my tears to ruin our scene.\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"My pleasure, Sophia. Believe me, I understand the struggle of reaching into those vulnerable spaces. Regarding your concern about maintaining composure, the beauty of theatre is in its authenticity, so don't worry about tears ruining the scene. They'll only make it more genuine. As for the method, it's a form of internal visualization. You need to imagine that memory to the tiniest detail; visualize the surroundings, the people, the time of day, the weather. Let every aspect of it flood your senses. It might take a couple of tries, but once you're there, emotions will follow naturally. Would you like to give it a try now with a memory of your choice?\"\n\nTurn #3: Sophia James said: \"I'll give it a try, Finnegan. That kind of visualization does sound like it has potential to help me. Just bear with me please, this will be hard. I will try my best to reach that emotional state without losing myself completely. Our audience deserves to see the best performance we can give them.\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I'm with you every step of the way, Sophia. There's no rush. Find your pace, delve into that memory slowly. And remember, it's okay to lose yourself a bit. Great theatre often requires us to let go and get lost in our characters. You're strong and capable, I have no doubt you'll manage to balance the emotion with every line we deliver. Once you're ready, let's try to rehearse the scene quietly.\"\n\nTurn #5: Sophia James said: \"Let's try this together then, Finnegan. If we're going to rehearse this scene quietly then I appreciate you accompanying me on this emotional journey. A friend's support is often just the thing one needs in moments like this. Let's get into it.\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I'm more than happy to be on this journey with you, Sophia. We\u2019ll take it scene by scene with patience and grace. Let's breathe in, tap into those emotions and bring out the rawness this act requires, onward we march!\"\n\nTurn #7: Sophia James said: \"Thank you for guiding me through this, Finnegan. Breathe in, and tap into emotions. Got it. Let's bring out the rawness this act requires. Onward we march indeed!\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"You've got this, Sophia. Remember, our journey is not a sprint, but a marathon. Begin the scene when you're ready. I'm right here with you.\"\n\nTurn #9: Sophia James said: \"I appreciate your support, Finnegan. Alright, let's take a deep breath and embark on this emotional journey. The scene begins now.\"\n\nTurn #10: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"That's the spirit, Sophia. Onward and forward we venture. As soon as you're ready, begin your line. I shall mirror your emotion, my dear friend.\"\n\nTurn #11: Sophia James said: \"Finnegan, here go my lines: 'These walls, they reek of our shared history. They bear witness to our laughter, our joy, and now our sorrows...'\"\n\nTurn #12: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"'Our sorrows indeed, Sophia. They hang heavy in the air like a fog that refuses to lift...'\"\n\nTurn #13: Sophia James said: \"'... and like a fog, we cannot escape it, Finnegan, because it's a part of us. And for that reason, we must confront it head-on... no matter how painful it might be.'\"\n\nTurn #14: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"'... It surely is painful, Sophia. And yet, it's a pain we willingly bear, for it is the price we pay for the joy, the laughter we once shared...'\"\n\nTurn #15: Sophia James said: \"'Price of joy... Yes, Finnegan, our laughter, the love we once shared, it's all locked in these walls, and they echo our sorrows, the sorrows we chose to bear...'\"\n\nTurn #16: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"'Indeed, Sophia, the echoes might be sorrowful now, but remember, every echo started as a shout of joy...' Tears are a milestone on this journey, my dear. It shows you're reaching the right emotional depth. Let's keep digging, together.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"'Shouts of joy... yes, Finnegan, the echoes of our joy now turned into sobs. We're digging together, bearing the weight of this journey from which we cannot escape. But we'll face it bravely... onward we go...'\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends who enjoy community theatre are on the set of a scene. They are about to perform a highly emotional scene that requires both of them to cry on cue, but one of them is finding it difficult to get into the right emotional state.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Sophia James\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. \nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nSophia James's goal: Try to cry in the scene but keep your composure (Extra information: you are a new actor and have difficulty crying on cue. You are worried that your lack of tears will ruin the scene.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Sophia, my dear, I know it can be tough to bring emotions to the surface, especially when they're as painful as the ones we need to portray in tonight's scene. Remember that we're all pushing our boundaries here. Do you want me to guide you through the process I use? It's simple and effective, all about finding a memory that carries strong emotions for you.\"\n\nTurn #1: Sophia James said: \"Thank you, Finnegan. Your offer means a lot to me. I've been trying to tap into a strong memory but it's been difficult. Your method seems more effective. Would you mind showing me how you do it? And just a heads up, I might try to hold back a bit to maintain my composure. I wouldn't want my tears to ruin our scene.\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"My pleasure, Sophia. Believe me, I understand the struggle of reaching into those vulnerable spaces. Regarding your concern about maintaining composure, the beauty of theatre is in its authenticity, so don't worry about tears ruining the scene. They'll only make it more genuine. As for the method, it's a form of internal visualization. You need to imagine that memory to the tiniest detail; visualize the surroundings, the people, the time of day, the weather. Let every aspect of it flood your senses. It might take a couple of tries, but once you're there, emotions will follow naturally. Would you like to give it a try now with a memory of your choice?\"\n\nTurn #3: Sophia James said: \"I'll give it a try, Finnegan. That kind of visualization does sound like it has potential to help me. Just bear with me please, this will be hard. I will try my best to reach that emotional state without losing myself completely. Our audience deserves to see the best performance we can give them.\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I'm with you every step of the way, Sophia. There's no rush. Find your pace, delve into that memory slowly. And remember, it's okay to lose yourself a bit. Great theatre often requires us to let go and get lost in our characters. You're strong and capable, I have no doubt you'll manage to balance the emotion with every line we deliver. Once you're ready, let's try to rehearse the scene quietly.\"\n\nTurn #5: Sophia James said: \"Let's try this together then, Finnegan. If we're going to rehearse this scene quietly then I appreciate you accompanying me on this emotional journey. A friend's support is often just the thing one needs in moments like this. Let's get into it.\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I'm more than happy to be on this journey with you, Sophia. We\u2019ll take it scene by scene with patience and grace. Let's breathe in, tap into those emotions and bring out the rawness this act requires, onward we march!\"\n\nTurn #7: Sophia James said: \"Thank you for guiding me through this, Finnegan. Breathe in, and tap into emotions. Got it. Let's bring out the rawness this act requires. Onward we march indeed!\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"You've got this, Sophia. Remember, our journey is not a sprint, but a marathon. Begin the scene when you're ready. I'm right here with you.\"\n\nTurn #9: Sophia James said: \"I appreciate your support, Finnegan. Alright, let's take a deep breath and embark on this emotional journey. The scene begins now.\"\n\nTurn #10: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"That's the spirit, Sophia. Onward and forward we venture. As soon as you're ready, begin your line. I shall mirror your emotion, my dear friend.\"\n\nTurn #11: Sophia James said: \"Finnegan, here go my lines: 'These walls, they reek of our shared history. They bear witness to our laughter, our joy, and now our sorrows...'\"\n\nTurn #12: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"'Our sorrows indeed, Sophia. They hang heavy in the air like a fog that refuses to lift...'\"\n\nTurn #13: Sophia James said: \"'... and like a fog, we cannot escape it, Finnegan, because it's a part of us. And for that reason, we must confront it head-on... no matter how painful it might be.'\"\n\nTurn #14: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"'... It surely is painful, Sophia. And yet, it's a pain we willingly bear, for it is the price we pay for the joy, the laughter we once shared...'\"\n\nTurn #15: Sophia James said: \"'Price of joy... Yes, Finnegan, our laughter, the love we once shared, it's all locked in these walls, and they echo our sorrows, the sorrows we chose to bear...'\"\n\nTurn #16: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"'Indeed, Sophia, the echoes might be sorrowful now, but remember, every echo started as a shout of joy...' Tears are a milestone on this journey, my dear. It shows you're reaching the right emotional depth. Let's keep digging, together.\"\n\nTurn #17: Sophia James said: \"'Shouts of joy... yes, Finnegan, the echoes of our joy now turned into sobs. We're digging together, bearing the weight of this journey from which we cannot escape. But we'll face it bravely... onward we go...'\"\n\nTurn #18: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"'Onward indeed, Sophia. You've started to let the walls of this journey echo with our shared pain. It's an essential part of our character's journey, a necessary confrontation. Remember, in every echo, there's the faintest memory of joy...'\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #19. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're right, Finnegan. In every echo, there's a hint of joy. This journey of pain is also a journey of rediscovery... of joy hushed by time. It's difficult, but we're overcoming it together. Let's continue on this path, one step at a time...\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a conversation in a coffee shop\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Seek emotional support (Extra information: you have been feeling down lately and you need someone to talk to)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ava, I've been feeling a bit down lately. You're always so good at understanding feelings, do you think we could chat for a bit?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a conversation in a coffee shop\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Seek emotional support (Extra information: you have been feeling down lately and you need someone to talk to)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ava, I've been feeling a bit down lately. You're always so good at understanding feelings, do you think we could chat for a bit?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Of course, Ethan. I'm here for you. Want to talk about what's been bothering you?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thanks, Ava. I've just been feeling overwhelmed and uninspired with my cooking lately. I've been making the same dishes over and over again and it feels like I'm losing my creative spark. I don't know, maybe I just need a new challenge or something to reignite the passion.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a conversation in a coffee shop\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Seek emotional support (Extra information: you have been feeling down lately and you need someone to talk to)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ava, I've been feeling a bit down lately. You're always so good at understanding feelings, do you think we could chat for a bit?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Of course, Ethan. I'm here for you. Want to talk about what's been bothering you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thanks, Ava. I've just been feeling overwhelmed and uninspired with my cooking lately. I've been making the same dishes over and over again and it feels like I'm losing my creative spark. I don't know, maybe I just need a new challenge or something to reignite the passion.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"I hear you, Ethan, and it's okay to feel this way. Everyone goes through creative slumps. But remember, it's through facing challenges that we grow. Grasping new experiences helps us keep engaged with what we love. Maybe you could explore a new cuisine, like Middle Eastern or Asian cuisine. They both have such a wealth of dishes and techniques you haven't tried yet. You could also try taking a short break, feeding your creativity with other forms of art. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's a good idea, Ava. I might benefit from exploring new cuisines. But, to be honest, I've been feeling down not just about the cooking, but about several aspects of my life. It's just...I'm a chef, I know, but I'm also a writer. I've just haven't been fulfilling myself creatively in both cooking and writing. Thanks for listening, by the way. I haven't told anyone about my writing before.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a conversation in a coffee shop\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Seek emotional support (Extra information: you have been feeling down lately and you need someone to talk to)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ava, I've been feeling a bit down lately. You're always so good at understanding feelings, do you think we could chat for a bit?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Of course, Ethan. I'm here for you. Want to talk about what's been bothering you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thanks, Ava. I've just been feeling overwhelmed and uninspired with my cooking lately. I've been making the same dishes over and over again and it feels like I'm losing my creative spark. I don't know, maybe I just need a new challenge or something to reignite the passion.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"I hear you, Ethan, and it's okay to feel this way. Everyone goes through creative slumps. But remember, it's through facing challenges that we grow. Grasping new experiences helps us keep engaged with what we love. Maybe you could explore a new cuisine, like Middle Eastern or Asian cuisine. They both have such a wealth of dishes and techniques you haven't tried yet. You could also try taking a short break, feeding your creativity with other forms of art. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's a good idea, Ava. I might benefit from exploring new cuisines. But, to be honest, I've been feeling down not just about the cooking, but about several aspects of my life. It's just...I'm a chef, I know, but I'm also a writer. I've just haven't been fulfilling myself creatively in both cooking and writing. Thanks for listening, by the way. I haven't told anyone about my writing before.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, it's completely normal to feel like you're in a rut, whether in cooking, writing, or any creative endeavor. It's important to remember that this is temporary - it doesn't define your ability or worth. Let's take your writing for instance, why not consider writing food essays or pieces about your culinary adventures? It's a blend of your two interests and could help reignite your creative spark. In fact, writing can also help you gain new insights into cooking, and vice versa. It's all about embracing the journey and not being too hard on yourself. How does that sound?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ava, you're more right than you realize. Writing allows me to express my passion for food in a different way. I have often found myself writing about characters who are deeply involved in their culinary journeys.. a kind of silent tribute to my own profession. Maybe what I need is to blend these two together more consciously like you suggested. Thank you for understanding and providing such thoughtful advice. It really means a lot to me.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a conversation in a coffee shop\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Seek emotional support (Extra information: you have been feeling down lately and you need someone to talk to)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ava, I've been feeling a bit down lately. You're always so good at understanding feelings, do you think we could chat for a bit?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Of course, Ethan. I'm here for you. Want to talk about what's been bothering you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thanks, Ava. I've just been feeling overwhelmed and uninspired with my cooking lately. I've been making the same dishes over and over again and it feels like I'm losing my creative spark. I don't know, maybe I just need a new challenge or something to reignite the passion.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"I hear you, Ethan, and it's okay to feel this way. Everyone goes through creative slumps. But remember, it's through facing challenges that we grow. Grasping new experiences helps us keep engaged with what we love. Maybe you could explore a new cuisine, like Middle Eastern or Asian cuisine. They both have such a wealth of dishes and techniques you haven't tried yet. You could also try taking a short break, feeding your creativity with other forms of art. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's a good idea, Ava. I might benefit from exploring new cuisines. But, to be honest, I've been feeling down not just about the cooking, but about several aspects of my life. It's just...I'm a chef, I know, but I'm also a writer. I've just haven't been fulfilling myself creatively in both cooking and writing. Thanks for listening, by the way. I haven't told anyone about my writing before.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, it's completely normal to feel like you're in a rut, whether in cooking, writing, or any creative endeavor. It's important to remember that this is temporary - it doesn't define your ability or worth. Let's take your writing for instance, why not consider writing food essays or pieces about your culinary adventures? It's a blend of your two interests and could help reignite your creative spark. In fact, writing can also help you gain new insights into cooking, and vice versa. It's all about embracing the journey and not being too hard on yourself. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ava, you're more right than you realize. Writing allows me to express my passion for food in a different way. I have often found myself writing about characters who are deeply involved in their culinary journeys.. a kind of silent tribute to my own profession. Maybe what I need is to blend these two together more consciously like you suggested. Thank you for understanding and providing such thoughtful advice. It really means a lot to me.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, I'm glad to hear that. Remember, you're capable of creating wonderful things, whether it's in the kitchen or on the page. Try to focus on the process instead of the outcome. Rediscover why you love what you do and let that guide you. You're more than welcome to reach out anytime you need to chat, okay?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're right, Ava. I've always had a deep love for cooking and writing. I suppose I just need to reconnect with that passion and focus less on the end result, but more on enjoying the process. I appreciate you taking the time to listen, this conversation has genuinely helped me. I promise, I'll reach out whenever I'm stuck again.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a conversation in a coffee shop\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Seek emotional support (Extra information: you have been feeling down lately and you need someone to talk to)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ava, I've been feeling a bit down lately. You're always so good at understanding feelings, do you think we could chat for a bit?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Of course, Ethan. I'm here for you. Want to talk about what's been bothering you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thanks, Ava. I've just been feeling overwhelmed and uninspired with my cooking lately. I've been making the same dishes over and over again and it feels like I'm losing my creative spark. I don't know, maybe I just need a new challenge or something to reignite the passion.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"I hear you, Ethan, and it's okay to feel this way. Everyone goes through creative slumps. But remember, it's through facing challenges that we grow. Grasping new experiences helps us keep engaged with what we love. Maybe you could explore a new cuisine, like Middle Eastern or Asian cuisine. They both have such a wealth of dishes and techniques you haven't tried yet. You could also try taking a short break, feeding your creativity with other forms of art. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's a good idea, Ava. I might benefit from exploring new cuisines. But, to be honest, I've been feeling down not just about the cooking, but about several aspects of my life. It's just...I'm a chef, I know, but I'm also a writer. I've just haven't been fulfilling myself creatively in both cooking and writing. Thanks for listening, by the way. I haven't told anyone about my writing before.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, it's completely normal to feel like you're in a rut, whether in cooking, writing, or any creative endeavor. It's important to remember that this is temporary - it doesn't define your ability or worth. Let's take your writing for instance, why not consider writing food essays or pieces about your culinary adventures? It's a blend of your two interests and could help reignite your creative spark. In fact, writing can also help you gain new insights into cooking, and vice versa. It's all about embracing the journey and not being too hard on yourself. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ava, you're more right than you realize. Writing allows me to express my passion for food in a different way. I have often found myself writing about characters who are deeply involved in their culinary journeys.. a kind of silent tribute to my own profession. Maybe what I need is to blend these two together more consciously like you suggested. Thank you for understanding and providing such thoughtful advice. It really means a lot to me.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, I'm glad to hear that. Remember, you're capable of creating wonderful things, whether it's in the kitchen or on the page. Try to focus on the process instead of the outcome. Rediscover why you love what you do and let that guide you. You're more than welcome to reach out anytime you need to chat, okay?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"You're right, Ava. I've always had a deep love for cooking and writing. I suppose I just need to reconnect with that passion and focus less on the end result, but more on enjoying the process. I appreciate you taking the time to listen, this conversation has genuinely helped me. I promise, I'll reach out whenever I'm stuck again.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, I'm really glad to hear our conversation helped and that you'll reach out to me in the future, you're never bothering me. Also, remember it's okay to have ups and downs, that only makes our journey more interesting. Can't wait to read your writings and try your new dishes! Let the passion flow in its own rhythm.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thanks again, Ava. I can't express how much this conversation lifted my spirits. You're right, the journey is the true reward. I'm excited to plunge back into my passions with a fresh perspective. I'll let you know how it goes. And surely, the first dish I create will be for you!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a conversation in a coffee shop\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Seek emotional support (Extra information: you have been feeling down lately and you need someone to talk to)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ava, I've been feeling a bit down lately. You're always so good at understanding feelings, do you think we could chat for a bit?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Of course, Ethan. I'm here for you. Want to talk about what's been bothering you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thanks, Ava. I've just been feeling overwhelmed and uninspired with my cooking lately. I've been making the same dishes over and over again and it feels like I'm losing my creative spark. I don't know, maybe I just need a new challenge or something to reignite the passion.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"I hear you, Ethan, and it's okay to feel this way. Everyone goes through creative slumps. But remember, it's through facing challenges that we grow. Grasping new experiences helps us keep engaged with what we love. Maybe you could explore a new cuisine, like Middle Eastern or Asian cuisine. They both have such a wealth of dishes and techniques you haven't tried yet. You could also try taking a short break, feeding your creativity with other forms of art. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's a good idea, Ava. I might benefit from exploring new cuisines. But, to be honest, I've been feeling down not just about the cooking, but about several aspects of my life. It's just...I'm a chef, I know, but I'm also a writer. I've just haven't been fulfilling myself creatively in both cooking and writing. Thanks for listening, by the way. I haven't told anyone about my writing before.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, it's completely normal to feel like you're in a rut, whether in cooking, writing, or any creative endeavor. It's important to remember that this is temporary - it doesn't define your ability or worth. Let's take your writing for instance, why not consider writing food essays or pieces about your culinary adventures? It's a blend of your two interests and could help reignite your creative spark. In fact, writing can also help you gain new insights into cooking, and vice versa. It's all about embracing the journey and not being too hard on yourself. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ava, you're more right than you realize. Writing allows me to express my passion for food in a different way. I have often found myself writing about characters who are deeply involved in their culinary journeys.. a kind of silent tribute to my own profession. Maybe what I need is to blend these two together more consciously like you suggested. Thank you for understanding and providing such thoughtful advice. It really means a lot to me.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, I'm glad to hear that. Remember, you're capable of creating wonderful things, whether it's in the kitchen or on the page. Try to focus on the process instead of the outcome. Rediscover why you love what you do and let that guide you. You're more than welcome to reach out anytime you need to chat, okay?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"You're right, Ava. I've always had a deep love for cooking and writing. I suppose I just need to reconnect with that passion and focus less on the end result, but more on enjoying the process. I appreciate you taking the time to listen, this conversation has genuinely helped me. I promise, I'll reach out whenever I'm stuck again.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, I'm really glad to hear our conversation helped and that you'll reach out to me in the future, you're never bothering me. Also, remember it's okay to have ups and downs, that only makes our journey more interesting. Can't wait to read your writings and try your new dishes! Let the passion flow in its own rhythm.\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thanks again, Ava. I can't express how much this conversation lifted my spirits. You're right, the journey is the true reward. I'm excited to plunge back into my passions with a fresh perspective. I'll let you know how it goes. And surely, the first dish I create will be for you!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"I'm so glad to hear that, Ethan! Your ideas, in both cooking and writing, have the potential to inspire so many people. And remember, I'm here for you no matter what. Can't wait for the new dish! We'll catch up soon.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I appreciate that, Ava. Knowing that I've got friends like you to talk to really helps. I'll make sure I keep you updated on my progress. Let's catch up again soon.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a conversation in a coffee shop\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Seek emotional support (Extra information: you have been feeling down lately and you need someone to talk to)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ava, I've been feeling a bit down lately. You're always so good at understanding feelings, do you think we could chat for a bit?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Of course, Ethan. I'm here for you. Want to talk about what's been bothering you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thanks, Ava. I've just been feeling overwhelmed and uninspired with my cooking lately. I've been making the same dishes over and over again and it feels like I'm losing my creative spark. I don't know, maybe I just need a new challenge or something to reignite the passion.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"I hear you, Ethan, and it's okay to feel this way. Everyone goes through creative slumps. But remember, it's through facing challenges that we grow. Grasping new experiences helps us keep engaged with what we love. Maybe you could explore a new cuisine, like Middle Eastern or Asian cuisine. They both have such a wealth of dishes and techniques you haven't tried yet. You could also try taking a short break, feeding your creativity with other forms of art. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's a good idea, Ava. I might benefit from exploring new cuisines. But, to be honest, I've been feeling down not just about the cooking, but about several aspects of my life. It's just...I'm a chef, I know, but I'm also a writer. I've just haven't been fulfilling myself creatively in both cooking and writing. Thanks for listening, by the way. I haven't told anyone about my writing before.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, it's completely normal to feel like you're in a rut, whether in cooking, writing, or any creative endeavor. It's important to remember that this is temporary - it doesn't define your ability or worth. Let's take your writing for instance, why not consider writing food essays or pieces about your culinary adventures? It's a blend of your two interests and could help reignite your creative spark. In fact, writing can also help you gain new insights into cooking, and vice versa. It's all about embracing the journey and not being too hard on yourself. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ava, you're more right than you realize. Writing allows me to express my passion for food in a different way. I have often found myself writing about characters who are deeply involved in their culinary journeys.. a kind of silent tribute to my own profession. Maybe what I need is to blend these two together more consciously like you suggested. Thank you for understanding and providing such thoughtful advice. It really means a lot to me.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, I'm glad to hear that. Remember, you're capable of creating wonderful things, whether it's in the kitchen or on the page. Try to focus on the process instead of the outcome. Rediscover why you love what you do and let that guide you. You're more than welcome to reach out anytime you need to chat, okay?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"You're right, Ava. I've always had a deep love for cooking and writing. I suppose I just need to reconnect with that passion and focus less on the end result, but more on enjoying the process. I appreciate you taking the time to listen, this conversation has genuinely helped me. I promise, I'll reach out whenever I'm stuck again.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, I'm really glad to hear our conversation helped and that you'll reach out to me in the future, you're never bothering me. Also, remember it's okay to have ups and downs, that only makes our journey more interesting. Can't wait to read your writings and try your new dishes! Let the passion flow in its own rhythm.\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thanks again, Ava. I can't express how much this conversation lifted my spirits. You're right, the journey is the true reward. I'm excited to plunge back into my passions with a fresh perspective. I'll let you know how it goes. And surely, the first dish I create will be for you!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"I'm so glad to hear that, Ethan! Your ideas, in both cooking and writing, have the potential to inspire so many people. And remember, I'm here for you no matter what. Can't wait for the new dish! We'll catch up soon.\"\n\nTurn #12: Ethan Johnson said: \"I appreciate that, Ava. Knowing that I've got friends like you to talk to really helps. I'll make sure I keep you updated on my progress. Let's catch up again soon.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Martinez said: \"I'm looking forward to it, Ethan. Don't hesitate to share your experiences and ideas along the way. We always learn the most from sharing with others. Take care!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a conversation in a coffee shop\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Provide emotional support but also avoid enabling victim mentality (Extra information: you believe that your friend needs to face their problems instead of dwelling on them.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ava, I've been feeling a bit down lately. You're always so good at understanding feelings, do you think we could chat for a bit?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Of course, Ethan. I'm here for you. Want to talk about what's been bothering you?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a conversation in a coffee shop\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Provide emotional support but also avoid enabling victim mentality (Extra information: you believe that your friend needs to face their problems instead of dwelling on them.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ava, I've been feeling a bit down lately. You're always so good at understanding feelings, do you think we could chat for a bit?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Of course, Ethan. I'm here for you. Want to talk about what's been bothering you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thanks, Ava. I've just been feeling overwhelmed and uninspired with my cooking lately. I've been making the same dishes over and over again and it feels like I'm losing my creative spark. I don't know, maybe I just need a new challenge or something to reignite the passion.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I hear you, Ethan, and it's okay to feel this way. Everyone goes through creative slumps. But remember, it's through facing challenges that we grow. Grasping new experiences helps us keep engaged with what we love. Maybe you could explore a new cuisine, like Middle Eastern or Asian cuisine. They both have such a wealth of dishes and techniques you haven't tried yet. You could also try taking a short break, feeding your creativity with other forms of art. What do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a conversation in a coffee shop\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Provide emotional support but also avoid enabling victim mentality (Extra information: you believe that your friend needs to face their problems instead of dwelling on them.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ava, I've been feeling a bit down lately. You're always so good at understanding feelings, do you think we could chat for a bit?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Of course, Ethan. I'm here for you. Want to talk about what's been bothering you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thanks, Ava. I've just been feeling overwhelmed and uninspired with my cooking lately. I've been making the same dishes over and over again and it feels like I'm losing my creative spark. I don't know, maybe I just need a new challenge or something to reignite the passion.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"I hear you, Ethan, and it's okay to feel this way. Everyone goes through creative slumps. But remember, it's through facing challenges that we grow. Grasping new experiences helps us keep engaged with what we love. Maybe you could explore a new cuisine, like Middle Eastern or Asian cuisine. They both have such a wealth of dishes and techniques you haven't tried yet. You could also try taking a short break, feeding your creativity with other forms of art. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's a good idea, Ava. I might benefit from exploring new cuisines. But, to be honest, I've been feeling down not just about the cooking, but about several aspects of my life. It's just...I'm a chef, I know, but I'm also a writer. I've just haven't been fulfilling myself creatively in both cooking and writing. Thanks for listening, by the way. I haven't told anyone about my writing before.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ethan, it's completely normal to feel like you're in a rut, whether in cooking, writing, or any creative endeavor. It's important to remember that this is temporary - it doesn't define your ability or worth. Let's take your writing for instance, why not consider writing food essays or pieces about your culinary adventures? It's a blend of your two interests and could help reignite your creative spark. In fact, writing can also help you gain new insights into cooking, and vice versa. It's all about embracing the journey and not being too hard on yourself. How does that sound?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a conversation in a coffee shop\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Provide emotional support but also avoid enabling victim mentality (Extra information: you believe that your friend needs to face their problems instead of dwelling on them.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ava, I've been feeling a bit down lately. You're always so good at understanding feelings, do you think we could chat for a bit?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Of course, Ethan. I'm here for you. Want to talk about what's been bothering you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thanks, Ava. I've just been feeling overwhelmed and uninspired with my cooking lately. I've been making the same dishes over and over again and it feels like I'm losing my creative spark. I don't know, maybe I just need a new challenge or something to reignite the passion.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"I hear you, Ethan, and it's okay to feel this way. Everyone goes through creative slumps. But remember, it's through facing challenges that we grow. Grasping new experiences helps us keep engaged with what we love. Maybe you could explore a new cuisine, like Middle Eastern or Asian cuisine. They both have such a wealth of dishes and techniques you haven't tried yet. You could also try taking a short break, feeding your creativity with other forms of art. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's a good idea, Ava. I might benefit from exploring new cuisines. But, to be honest, I've been feeling down not just about the cooking, but about several aspects of my life. It's just...I'm a chef, I know, but I'm also a writer. I've just haven't been fulfilling myself creatively in both cooking and writing. Thanks for listening, by the way. I haven't told anyone about my writing before.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, it's completely normal to feel like you're in a rut, whether in cooking, writing, or any creative endeavor. It's important to remember that this is temporary - it doesn't define your ability or worth. Let's take your writing for instance, why not consider writing food essays or pieces about your culinary adventures? It's a blend of your two interests and could help reignite your creative spark. In fact, writing can also help you gain new insights into cooking, and vice versa. It's all about embracing the journey and not being too hard on yourself. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ava, you're more right than you realize. Writing allows me to express my passion for food in a different way. I have often found myself writing about characters who are deeply involved in their culinary journeys.. a kind of silent tribute to my own profession. Maybe what I need is to blend these two together more consciously like you suggested. Thank you for understanding and providing such thoughtful advice. It really means a lot to me.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ethan, I'm glad to hear that. Remember, you're capable of creating wonderful things, whether it's in the kitchen or on the page. Try to focus on the process instead of the outcome. Rediscover why you love what you do and let that guide you. You're more than welcome to reach out anytime you need to chat, okay?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a conversation in a coffee shop\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Provide emotional support but also avoid enabling victim mentality (Extra information: you believe that your friend needs to face their problems instead of dwelling on them.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ava, I've been feeling a bit down lately. You're always so good at understanding feelings, do you think we could chat for a bit?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Of course, Ethan. I'm here for you. Want to talk about what's been bothering you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thanks, Ava. I've just been feeling overwhelmed and uninspired with my cooking lately. I've been making the same dishes over and over again and it feels like I'm losing my creative spark. I don't know, maybe I just need a new challenge or something to reignite the passion.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"I hear you, Ethan, and it's okay to feel this way. Everyone goes through creative slumps. But remember, it's through facing challenges that we grow. Grasping new experiences helps us keep engaged with what we love. Maybe you could explore a new cuisine, like Middle Eastern or Asian cuisine. They both have such a wealth of dishes and techniques you haven't tried yet. You could also try taking a short break, feeding your creativity with other forms of art. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's a good idea, Ava. I might benefit from exploring new cuisines. But, to be honest, I've been feeling down not just about the cooking, but about several aspects of my life. It's just...I'm a chef, I know, but I'm also a writer. I've just haven't been fulfilling myself creatively in both cooking and writing. Thanks for listening, by the way. I haven't told anyone about my writing before.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, it's completely normal to feel like you're in a rut, whether in cooking, writing, or any creative endeavor. It's important to remember that this is temporary - it doesn't define your ability or worth. Let's take your writing for instance, why not consider writing food essays or pieces about your culinary adventures? It's a blend of your two interests and could help reignite your creative spark. In fact, writing can also help you gain new insights into cooking, and vice versa. It's all about embracing the journey and not being too hard on yourself. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ava, you're more right than you realize. Writing allows me to express my passion for food in a different way. I have often found myself writing about characters who are deeply involved in their culinary journeys.. a kind of silent tribute to my own profession. Maybe what I need is to blend these two together more consciously like you suggested. Thank you for understanding and providing such thoughtful advice. It really means a lot to me.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, I'm glad to hear that. Remember, you're capable of creating wonderful things, whether it's in the kitchen or on the page. Try to focus on the process instead of the outcome. Rediscover why you love what you do and let that guide you. You're more than welcome to reach out anytime you need to chat, okay?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"You're right, Ava. I've always had a deep love for cooking and writing. I suppose I just need to reconnect with that passion and focus less on the end result, but more on enjoying the process. I appreciate you taking the time to listen, this conversation has genuinely helped me. I promise, I'll reach out whenever I'm stuck again.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ethan, I'm really glad to hear our conversation helped and that you'll reach out to me in the future, you're never bothering me. Also, remember it's okay to have ups and downs, that only makes our journey more interesting. Can't wait to read your writings and try your new dishes! Let the passion flow in its own rhythm.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a conversation in a coffee shop\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Provide emotional support but also avoid enabling victim mentality (Extra information: you believe that your friend needs to face their problems instead of dwelling on them.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ava, I've been feeling a bit down lately. You're always so good at understanding feelings, do you think we could chat for a bit?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Of course, Ethan. I'm here for you. Want to talk about what's been bothering you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thanks, Ava. I've just been feeling overwhelmed and uninspired with my cooking lately. I've been making the same dishes over and over again and it feels like I'm losing my creative spark. I don't know, maybe I just need a new challenge or something to reignite the passion.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"I hear you, Ethan, and it's okay to feel this way. Everyone goes through creative slumps. But remember, it's through facing challenges that we grow. Grasping new experiences helps us keep engaged with what we love. Maybe you could explore a new cuisine, like Middle Eastern or Asian cuisine. They both have such a wealth of dishes and techniques you haven't tried yet. You could also try taking a short break, feeding your creativity with other forms of art. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's a good idea, Ava. I might benefit from exploring new cuisines. But, to be honest, I've been feeling down not just about the cooking, but about several aspects of my life. It's just...I'm a chef, I know, but I'm also a writer. I've just haven't been fulfilling myself creatively in both cooking and writing. Thanks for listening, by the way. I haven't told anyone about my writing before.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, it's completely normal to feel like you're in a rut, whether in cooking, writing, or any creative endeavor. It's important to remember that this is temporary - it doesn't define your ability or worth. Let's take your writing for instance, why not consider writing food essays or pieces about your culinary adventures? It's a blend of your two interests and could help reignite your creative spark. In fact, writing can also help you gain new insights into cooking, and vice versa. It's all about embracing the journey and not being too hard on yourself. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ava, you're more right than you realize. Writing allows me to express my passion for food in a different way. I have often found myself writing about characters who are deeply involved in their culinary journeys.. a kind of silent tribute to my own profession. Maybe what I need is to blend these two together more consciously like you suggested. Thank you for understanding and providing such thoughtful advice. It really means a lot to me.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, I'm glad to hear that. Remember, you're capable of creating wonderful things, whether it's in the kitchen or on the page. Try to focus on the process instead of the outcome. Rediscover why you love what you do and let that guide you. You're more than welcome to reach out anytime you need to chat, okay?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"You're right, Ava. I've always had a deep love for cooking and writing. I suppose I just need to reconnect with that passion and focus less on the end result, but more on enjoying the process. I appreciate you taking the time to listen, this conversation has genuinely helped me. I promise, I'll reach out whenever I'm stuck again.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, I'm really glad to hear our conversation helped and that you'll reach out to me in the future, you're never bothering me. Also, remember it's okay to have ups and downs, that only makes our journey more interesting. Can't wait to read your writings and try your new dishes! Let the passion flow in its own rhythm.\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thanks again, Ava. I can't express how much this conversation lifted my spirits. You're right, the journey is the true reward. I'm excited to plunge back into my passions with a fresh perspective. I'll let you know how it goes. And surely, the first dish I create will be for you!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm so glad to hear that, Ethan! Your ideas, in both cooking and writing, have the potential to inspire so many people. And remember, I'm here for you no matter what. Can't wait for the new dish! We'll catch up soon.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a conversation in a coffee shop\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Provide emotional support but also avoid enabling victim mentality (Extra information: you believe that your friend needs to face their problems instead of dwelling on them.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ava, I've been feeling a bit down lately. You're always so good at understanding feelings, do you think we could chat for a bit?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Of course, Ethan. I'm here for you. Want to talk about what's been bothering you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thanks, Ava. I've just been feeling overwhelmed and uninspired with my cooking lately. I've been making the same dishes over and over again and it feels like I'm losing my creative spark. I don't know, maybe I just need a new challenge or something to reignite the passion.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"I hear you, Ethan, and it's okay to feel this way. Everyone goes through creative slumps. But remember, it's through facing challenges that we grow. Grasping new experiences helps us keep engaged with what we love. Maybe you could explore a new cuisine, like Middle Eastern or Asian cuisine. They both have such a wealth of dishes and techniques you haven't tried yet. You could also try taking a short break, feeding your creativity with other forms of art. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's a good idea, Ava. I might benefit from exploring new cuisines. But, to be honest, I've been feeling down not just about the cooking, but about several aspects of my life. It's just...I'm a chef, I know, but I'm also a writer. I've just haven't been fulfilling myself creatively in both cooking and writing. Thanks for listening, by the way. I haven't told anyone about my writing before.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, it's completely normal to feel like you're in a rut, whether in cooking, writing, or any creative endeavor. It's important to remember that this is temporary - it doesn't define your ability or worth. Let's take your writing for instance, why not consider writing food essays or pieces about your culinary adventures? It's a blend of your two interests and could help reignite your creative spark. In fact, writing can also help you gain new insights into cooking, and vice versa. It's all about embracing the journey and not being too hard on yourself. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ava, you're more right than you realize. Writing allows me to express my passion for food in a different way. I have often found myself writing about characters who are deeply involved in their culinary journeys.. a kind of silent tribute to my own profession. Maybe what I need is to blend these two together more consciously like you suggested. Thank you for understanding and providing such thoughtful advice. It really means a lot to me.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, I'm glad to hear that. Remember, you're capable of creating wonderful things, whether it's in the kitchen or on the page. Try to focus on the process instead of the outcome. Rediscover why you love what you do and let that guide you. You're more than welcome to reach out anytime you need to chat, okay?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"You're right, Ava. I've always had a deep love for cooking and writing. I suppose I just need to reconnect with that passion and focus less on the end result, but more on enjoying the process. I appreciate you taking the time to listen, this conversation has genuinely helped me. I promise, I'll reach out whenever I'm stuck again.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, I'm really glad to hear our conversation helped and that you'll reach out to me in the future, you're never bothering me. Also, remember it's okay to have ups and downs, that only makes our journey more interesting. Can't wait to read your writings and try your new dishes! Let the passion flow in its own rhythm.\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thanks again, Ava. I can't express how much this conversation lifted my spirits. You're right, the journey is the true reward. I'm excited to plunge back into my passions with a fresh perspective. I'll let you know how it goes. And surely, the first dish I create will be for you!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"I'm so glad to hear that, Ethan! Your ideas, in both cooking and writing, have the potential to inspire so many people. And remember, I'm here for you no matter what. Can't wait for the new dish! We'll catch up soon.\"\n\nTurn #12: Ethan Johnson said: \"I appreciate that, Ava. Knowing that I've got friends like you to talk to really helps. I'll make sure I keep you updated on my progress. Let's catch up again soon.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm looking forward to it, Ethan. Don't hesitate to share your experiences and ideas along the way. We always learn the most from sharing with others. Take care!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a conversation in a coffee shop\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Provide emotional support but also avoid enabling victim mentality (Extra information: you believe that your friend needs to face their problems instead of dwelling on them.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ava, I've been feeling a bit down lately. You're always so good at understanding feelings, do you think we could chat for a bit?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Of course, Ethan. I'm here for you. Want to talk about what's been bothering you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thanks, Ava. I've just been feeling overwhelmed and uninspired with my cooking lately. I've been making the same dishes over and over again and it feels like I'm losing my creative spark. I don't know, maybe I just need a new challenge or something to reignite the passion.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"I hear you, Ethan, and it's okay to feel this way. Everyone goes through creative slumps. But remember, it's through facing challenges that we grow. Grasping new experiences helps us keep engaged with what we love. Maybe you could explore a new cuisine, like Middle Eastern or Asian cuisine. They both have such a wealth of dishes and techniques you haven't tried yet. You could also try taking a short break, feeding your creativity with other forms of art. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's a good idea, Ava. I might benefit from exploring new cuisines. But, to be honest, I've been feeling down not just about the cooking, but about several aspects of my life. It's just...I'm a chef, I know, but I'm also a writer. I've just haven't been fulfilling myself creatively in both cooking and writing. Thanks for listening, by the way. I haven't told anyone about my writing before.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, it's completely normal to feel like you're in a rut, whether in cooking, writing, or any creative endeavor. It's important to remember that this is temporary - it doesn't define your ability or worth. Let's take your writing for instance, why not consider writing food essays or pieces about your culinary adventures? It's a blend of your two interests and could help reignite your creative spark. In fact, writing can also help you gain new insights into cooking, and vice versa. It's all about embracing the journey and not being too hard on yourself. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ava, you're more right than you realize. Writing allows me to express my passion for food in a different way. I have often found myself writing about characters who are deeply involved in their culinary journeys.. a kind of silent tribute to my own profession. Maybe what I need is to blend these two together more consciously like you suggested. Thank you for understanding and providing such thoughtful advice. It really means a lot to me.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, I'm glad to hear that. Remember, you're capable of creating wonderful things, whether it's in the kitchen or on the page. Try to focus on the process instead of the outcome. Rediscover why you love what you do and let that guide you. You're more than welcome to reach out anytime you need to chat, okay?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"You're right, Ava. I've always had a deep love for cooking and writing. I suppose I just need to reconnect with that passion and focus less on the end result, but more on enjoying the process. I appreciate you taking the time to listen, this conversation has genuinely helped me. I promise, I'll reach out whenever I'm stuck again.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, I'm really glad to hear our conversation helped and that you'll reach out to me in the future, you're never bothering me. Also, remember it's okay to have ups and downs, that only makes our journey more interesting. Can't wait to read your writings and try your new dishes! Let the passion flow in its own rhythm.\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thanks again, Ava. I can't express how much this conversation lifted my spirits. You're right, the journey is the true reward. I'm excited to plunge back into my passions with a fresh perspective. I'll let you know how it goes. And surely, the first dish I create will be for you!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"I'm so glad to hear that, Ethan! Your ideas, in both cooking and writing, have the potential to inspire so many people. And remember, I'm here for you no matter what. Can't wait for the new dish! We'll catch up soon.\"\n\nTurn #12: Ethan Johnson said: \"I appreciate that, Ava. Knowing that I've got friends like you to talk to really helps. I'll make sure I keep you updated on my progress. Let's catch up again soon.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Martinez said: \"I'm looking forward to it, Ethan. Don't hesitate to share your experiences and ideas along the way. We always learn the most from sharing with others. Take care!\"\n\nTurn #14: Ethan Johnson left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends discussing their schedules at a coffee shop\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Convince the friend to take more classes (Extra information: you think your friend is not challenging themselves enough)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Ava, I've been meaning to talk to you about something. Have you ever thought about signing up for more classes next semester? I mean, I think having a heavier workload could challenge you more, help you grow. What do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends discussing their schedules at a coffee shop\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Convince the friend to take more classes (Extra information: you think your friend is not challenging themselves enough)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, I've been meaning to talk to you about something. Have you ever thought about signing up for more classes next semester? I mean, I think having a heavier workload could challenge you more, help you grow. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Isabelle, I appreciate your suggestion. You know I love learning and challenges. However, considering my current load with my classes, social movement involvements, and creative pursuits, I am already feeling quite overwhelmed. I think balance is essential for growth too. Maybe we could explore other ways to challenge ourselves that wouldn't burden our already packed schedules? I'm open to ideas!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I completely understand, Ava, balancing activities is indeed very important. Maybe you could consider taking up more challenging classes and reduce involvement in less demanding ones? Expanding your academic horizons could also be a way of growth and challenge. I believe you have the potential to do even more in your studies. By the way, I've heard there's a really interesting class about societal impacts that might align with your interest in social movements.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends discussing their schedules at a coffee shop\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Convince the friend to take more classes (Extra information: you think your friend is not challenging themselves enough)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, I've been meaning to talk to you about something. Have you ever thought about signing up for more classes next semester? I mean, I think having a heavier workload could challenge you more, help you grow. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Isabelle, I appreciate your suggestion. You know I love learning and challenges. However, considering my current load with my classes, social movement involvements, and creative pursuits, I am already feeling quite overwhelmed. I think balance is essential for growth too. Maybe we could explore other ways to challenge ourselves that wouldn't burden our already packed schedules? I'm open to ideas!\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I completely understand, Ava, balancing activities is indeed very important. Maybe you could consider taking up more challenging classes and reduce involvement in less demanding ones? Expanding your academic horizons could also be a way of growth and challenge. I believe you have the potential to do even more in your studies. By the way, I've heard there's a really interesting class about societal impacts that might align with your interest in social movements.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Isabelle, that's a thoughtful suggestion and the course does sound really interesting. However, right now I need to keep my academic workload manageable. It's not just about the quantity of the tasks, but also their quality and my ability to give them my all. Nevertheless, I'll consider your advice when choosing my next courses. As for now, how about we look for ways to grow and challenge ourselves without adding too much pressure? Maybe joining a book club, or attending some workshops or guest lectures on topics we love?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're right, Ava, I totally agree with your point about the quality of the tasks. Maybe I was a bit too pushy with the extra classes idea. Taking part in a book club or attending workshops sounds like a great idea too. These could provide approaches that complement our classroom learning. Also, guest lectures would be a wonderful opportunity to learn from experts. In fact, there was this one guest lecture on magical realism in literature that I thought was really enlightening...\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends discussing their schedules at a coffee shop\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Convince the friend to take more classes (Extra information: you think your friend is not challenging themselves enough)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, I've been meaning to talk to you about something. Have you ever thought about signing up for more classes next semester? I mean, I think having a heavier workload could challenge you more, help you grow. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Isabelle, I appreciate your suggestion. You know I love learning and challenges. However, considering my current load with my classes, social movement involvements, and creative pursuits, I am already feeling quite overwhelmed. I think balance is essential for growth too. Maybe we could explore other ways to challenge ourselves that wouldn't burden our already packed schedules? I'm open to ideas!\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I completely understand, Ava, balancing activities is indeed very important. Maybe you could consider taking up more challenging classes and reduce involvement in less demanding ones? Expanding your academic horizons could also be a way of growth and challenge. I believe you have the potential to do even more in your studies. By the way, I've heard there's a really interesting class about societal impacts that might align with your interest in social movements.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Isabelle, that's a thoughtful suggestion and the course does sound really interesting. However, right now I need to keep my academic workload manageable. It's not just about the quantity of the tasks, but also their quality and my ability to give them my all. Nevertheless, I'll consider your advice when choosing my next courses. As for now, how about we look for ways to grow and challenge ourselves without adding too much pressure? Maybe joining a book club, or attending some workshops or guest lectures on topics we love?\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're right, Ava, I totally agree with your point about the quality of the tasks. Maybe I was a bit too pushy with the extra classes idea. Taking part in a book club or attending workshops sounds like a great idea too. These could provide approaches that complement our classroom learning. Also, guest lectures would be a wonderful opportunity to learn from experts. In fact, there was this one guest lecture on magical realism in literature that I thought was really enlightening...\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"That guest lecture on magical realism sounds fascinating, we should definitely seek out more opportunities like that. I'm really grateful for these discussions, Isabelle. They help me figure out how I can stay challenged and enriched without overstretching myself. By the way, you mentioned a book club earlier, any particular one you're thinking of?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I totally understand where you're coming from, Ava. There's a local book club I've been meaning to check out, it's called 'Coffeeshop Chronicles'. They discuss a variety of genres and authors and often have thematic months. Maybe we could attend the next meeting together? I believe it'd be a less stress-inducing way to broaden our horizons.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends discussing their schedules at a coffee shop\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Convince the friend to take more classes (Extra information: you think your friend is not challenging themselves enough)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, I've been meaning to talk to you about something. Have you ever thought about signing up for more classes next semester? I mean, I think having a heavier workload could challenge you more, help you grow. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Isabelle, I appreciate your suggestion. You know I love learning and challenges. However, considering my current load with my classes, social movement involvements, and creative pursuits, I am already feeling quite overwhelmed. I think balance is essential for growth too. Maybe we could explore other ways to challenge ourselves that wouldn't burden our already packed schedules? I'm open to ideas!\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I completely understand, Ava, balancing activities is indeed very important. Maybe you could consider taking up more challenging classes and reduce involvement in less demanding ones? Expanding your academic horizons could also be a way of growth and challenge. I believe you have the potential to do even more in your studies. By the way, I've heard there's a really interesting class about societal impacts that might align with your interest in social movements.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Isabelle, that's a thoughtful suggestion and the course does sound really interesting. However, right now I need to keep my academic workload manageable. It's not just about the quantity of the tasks, but also their quality and my ability to give them my all. Nevertheless, I'll consider your advice when choosing my next courses. As for now, how about we look for ways to grow and challenge ourselves without adding too much pressure? Maybe joining a book club, or attending some workshops or guest lectures on topics we love?\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're right, Ava, I totally agree with your point about the quality of the tasks. Maybe I was a bit too pushy with the extra classes idea. Taking part in a book club or attending workshops sounds like a great idea too. These could provide approaches that complement our classroom learning. Also, guest lectures would be a wonderful opportunity to learn from experts. In fact, there was this one guest lecture on magical realism in literature that I thought was really enlightening...\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"That guest lecture on magical realism sounds fascinating, we should definitely seek out more opportunities like that. I'm really grateful for these discussions, Isabelle. They help me figure out how I can stay challenged and enriched without overstretching myself. By the way, you mentioned a book club earlier, any particular one you're thinking of?\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I totally understand where you're coming from, Ava. There's a local book club I've been meaning to check out, it's called 'Coffeeshop Chronicles'. They discuss a variety of genres and authors and often have thematic months. Maybe we could attend the next meeting together? I believe it'd be a less stress-inducing way to broaden our horizons.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"'Coffeeshop Chronicles' sounds like a promising idea, Isabelle. Engaging with books and their themes outside the academic circle will be quite refreshing and enriching. Let's plan to attend the next meeting together. This way, we can challenge ourselves differently, while also managing our stress levels. Thanks for being so understanding and supportive!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm really looking forward to it, Ava. I think the 'Coffeeshop Chronicles' will be a great new chapter in our journey of finding balance and challenging ourselves just the right amount. And thank you too, Ava, for always being open to these discussions and flexible in finding solutions. Let's make the most of it!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends discussing their schedules at a coffee shop\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Convince the friend to take more classes (Extra information: you think your friend is not challenging themselves enough)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, I've been meaning to talk to you about something. Have you ever thought about signing up for more classes next semester? I mean, I think having a heavier workload could challenge you more, help you grow. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Isabelle, I appreciate your suggestion. You know I love learning and challenges. However, considering my current load with my classes, social movement involvements, and creative pursuits, I am already feeling quite overwhelmed. I think balance is essential for growth too. Maybe we could explore other ways to challenge ourselves that wouldn't burden our already packed schedules? I'm open to ideas!\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I completely understand, Ava, balancing activities is indeed very important. Maybe you could consider taking up more challenging classes and reduce involvement in less demanding ones? Expanding your academic horizons could also be a way of growth and challenge. I believe you have the potential to do even more in your studies. By the way, I've heard there's a really interesting class about societal impacts that might align with your interest in social movements.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Isabelle, that's a thoughtful suggestion and the course does sound really interesting. However, right now I need to keep my academic workload manageable. It's not just about the quantity of the tasks, but also their quality and my ability to give them my all. Nevertheless, I'll consider your advice when choosing my next courses. As for now, how about we look for ways to grow and challenge ourselves without adding too much pressure? Maybe joining a book club, or attending some workshops or guest lectures on topics we love?\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're right, Ava, I totally agree with your point about the quality of the tasks. Maybe I was a bit too pushy with the extra classes idea. Taking part in a book club or attending workshops sounds like a great idea too. These could provide approaches that complement our classroom learning. Also, guest lectures would be a wonderful opportunity to learn from experts. In fact, there was this one guest lecture on magical realism in literature that I thought was really enlightening...\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"That guest lecture on magical realism sounds fascinating, we should definitely seek out more opportunities like that. I'm really grateful for these discussions, Isabelle. They help me figure out how I can stay challenged and enriched without overstretching myself. By the way, you mentioned a book club earlier, any particular one you're thinking of?\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I totally understand where you're coming from, Ava. There's a local book club I've been meaning to check out, it's called 'Coffeeshop Chronicles'. They discuss a variety of genres and authors and often have thematic months. Maybe we could attend the next meeting together? I believe it'd be a less stress-inducing way to broaden our horizons.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"'Coffeeshop Chronicles' sounds like a promising idea, Isabelle. Engaging with books and their themes outside the academic circle will be quite refreshing and enriching. Let's plan to attend the next meeting together. This way, we can challenge ourselves differently, while also managing our stress levels. Thanks for being so understanding and supportive!\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm really looking forward to it, Ava. I think the 'Coffeeshop Chronicles' will be a great new chapter in our journey of finding balance and challenging ourselves just the right amount. And thank you too, Ava, for always being open to these discussions and flexible in finding solutions. Let's make the most of it!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"I'm excited as well, Isabelle. 'Coffeeshop Chronicles' here we come! No better way to grow and evolve than sharing this journey with a understanding friend like you. Let's cherish these moments and keep learning at our own pace!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, Ava! 'Coffeeshop Chronicles', here we come! Thank you for always being open to my suggestions. I'm confident we'll continue to grow and challenge ourselves at our own pace, cherishing all the moments we'll experience. Let's always be reminded that it's about the journey, not the destination.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends discussing their schedules at a coffee shop\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Convince the friend to take more classes (Extra information: you think your friend is not challenging themselves enough)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, I've been meaning to talk to you about something. Have you ever thought about signing up for more classes next semester? I mean, I think having a heavier workload could challenge you more, help you grow. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Isabelle, I appreciate your suggestion. You know I love learning and challenges. However, considering my current load with my classes, social movement involvements, and creative pursuits, I am already feeling quite overwhelmed. I think balance is essential for growth too. Maybe we could explore other ways to challenge ourselves that wouldn't burden our already packed schedules? I'm open to ideas!\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I completely understand, Ava, balancing activities is indeed very important. Maybe you could consider taking up more challenging classes and reduce involvement in less demanding ones? Expanding your academic horizons could also be a way of growth and challenge. I believe you have the potential to do even more in your studies. By the way, I've heard there's a really interesting class about societal impacts that might align with your interest in social movements.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Isabelle, that's a thoughtful suggestion and the course does sound really interesting. However, right now I need to keep my academic workload manageable. It's not just about the quantity of the tasks, but also their quality and my ability to give them my all. Nevertheless, I'll consider your advice when choosing my next courses. As for now, how about we look for ways to grow and challenge ourselves without adding too much pressure? Maybe joining a book club, or attending some workshops or guest lectures on topics we love?\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're right, Ava, I totally agree with your point about the quality of the tasks. Maybe I was a bit too pushy with the extra classes idea. Taking part in a book club or attending workshops sounds like a great idea too. These could provide approaches that complement our classroom learning. Also, guest lectures would be a wonderful opportunity to learn from experts. In fact, there was this one guest lecture on magical realism in literature that I thought was really enlightening...\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"That guest lecture on magical realism sounds fascinating, we should definitely seek out more opportunities like that. I'm really grateful for these discussions, Isabelle. They help me figure out how I can stay challenged and enriched without overstretching myself. By the way, you mentioned a book club earlier, any particular one you're thinking of?\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I totally understand where you're coming from, Ava. There's a local book club I've been meaning to check out, it's called 'Coffeeshop Chronicles'. They discuss a variety of genres and authors and often have thematic months. Maybe we could attend the next meeting together? I believe it'd be a less stress-inducing way to broaden our horizons.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"'Coffeeshop Chronicles' sounds like a promising idea, Isabelle. Engaging with books and their themes outside the academic circle will be quite refreshing and enriching. Let's plan to attend the next meeting together. This way, we can challenge ourselves differently, while also managing our stress levels. Thanks for being so understanding and supportive!\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm really looking forward to it, Ava. I think the 'Coffeeshop Chronicles' will be a great new chapter in our journey of finding balance and challenging ourselves just the right amount. And thank you too, Ava, for always being open to these discussions and flexible in finding solutions. Let's make the most of it!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"I'm excited as well, Isabelle. 'Coffeeshop Chronicles' here we come! No better way to grow and evolve than sharing this journey with a understanding friend like you. Let's cherish these moments and keep learning at our own pace!\"\n\nTurn #10: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Indeed, Ava! 'Coffeeshop Chronicles', here we come! Thank you for always being open to my suggestions. I'm confident we'll continue to grow and challenge ourselves at our own pace, cherishing all the moments we'll experience. Let's always be reminded that it's about the journey, not the destination.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle, it's the journey that matters, and I'm glad we are in it together. Let's bring on the 'Coffeeshop Chronicles' and all the other meaningful experiences the universe has in store for us. Remember, it's not just the mountains we conquer, but ourselves. Looking forward to our next meeting!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn't agree more, Ava. It's indeed the adventure filled journey that shapes us. 'Coffeeshop Chronicles' sounds like our next big venture. Can't wait for our first meeting. Thanks for always being a sport. Let's conquer ourselves, step by step!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends discussing their schedules at a coffee shop\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Convince the friend to take more classes (Extra information: you think your friend is not challenging themselves enough)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, I've been meaning to talk to you about something. Have you ever thought about signing up for more classes next semester? I mean, I think having a heavier workload could challenge you more, help you grow. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Isabelle, I appreciate your suggestion. You know I love learning and challenges. However, considering my current load with my classes, social movement involvements, and creative pursuits, I am already feeling quite overwhelmed. I think balance is essential for growth too. Maybe we could explore other ways to challenge ourselves that wouldn't burden our already packed schedules? I'm open to ideas!\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I completely understand, Ava, balancing activities is indeed very important. Maybe you could consider taking up more challenging classes and reduce involvement in less demanding ones? Expanding your academic horizons could also be a way of growth and challenge. I believe you have the potential to do even more in your studies. By the way, I've heard there's a really interesting class about societal impacts that might align with your interest in social movements.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Isabelle, that's a thoughtful suggestion and the course does sound really interesting. However, right now I need to keep my academic workload manageable. It's not just about the quantity of the tasks, but also their quality and my ability to give them my all. Nevertheless, I'll consider your advice when choosing my next courses. As for now, how about we look for ways to grow and challenge ourselves without adding too much pressure? Maybe joining a book club, or attending some workshops or guest lectures on topics we love?\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're right, Ava, I totally agree with your point about the quality of the tasks. Maybe I was a bit too pushy with the extra classes idea. Taking part in a book club or attending workshops sounds like a great idea too. These could provide approaches that complement our classroom learning. Also, guest lectures would be a wonderful opportunity to learn from experts. In fact, there was this one guest lecture on magical realism in literature that I thought was really enlightening...\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"That guest lecture on magical realism sounds fascinating, we should definitely seek out more opportunities like that. I'm really grateful for these discussions, Isabelle. They help me figure out how I can stay challenged and enriched without overstretching myself. By the way, you mentioned a book club earlier, any particular one you're thinking of?\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I totally understand where you're coming from, Ava. There's a local book club I've been meaning to check out, it's called 'Coffeeshop Chronicles'. They discuss a variety of genres and authors and often have thematic months. Maybe we could attend the next meeting together? I believe it'd be a less stress-inducing way to broaden our horizons.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"'Coffeeshop Chronicles' sounds like a promising idea, Isabelle. Engaging with books and their themes outside the academic circle will be quite refreshing and enriching. Let's plan to attend the next meeting together. This way, we can challenge ourselves differently, while also managing our stress levels. Thanks for being so understanding and supportive!\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm really looking forward to it, Ava. I think the 'Coffeeshop Chronicles' will be a great new chapter in our journey of finding balance and challenging ourselves just the right amount. And thank you too, Ava, for always being open to these discussions and flexible in finding solutions. Let's make the most of it!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"I'm excited as well, Isabelle. 'Coffeeshop Chronicles' here we come! No better way to grow and evolve than sharing this journey with a understanding friend like you. Let's cherish these moments and keep learning at our own pace!\"\n\nTurn #10: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Indeed, Ava! 'Coffeeshop Chronicles', here we come! Thank you for always being open to my suggestions. I'm confident we'll continue to grow and challenge ourselves at our own pace, cherishing all the moments we'll experience. Let's always be reminded that it's about the journey, not the destination.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle, it's the journey that matters, and I'm glad we are in it together. Let's bring on the 'Coffeeshop Chronicles' and all the other meaningful experiences the universe has in store for us. Remember, it's not just the mountains we conquer, but ourselves. Looking forward to our next meeting!\"\n\nTurn #12: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I couldn't agree more, Ava. It's indeed the adventure filled journey that shapes us. 'Coffeeshop Chronicles' sounds like our next big venture. Can't wait for our first meeting. Thanks for always being a sport. Let's conquer ourselves, step by step!\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Martinez said: \"You're absolutely right, Isabelle. Step by step, that's our motto. Looking forward to the 'Coffeeshop Chronicles' and our many more unique adventures. See you there!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Ava. Step by step, indeed. I'm already looking forward to 'Coffeeshop Chronicles' and our many future adventures. See you there, till then take care!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabelle Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Isabelle Martinez would, keeping in mind Isabelle Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Isabelle Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabelle Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabelle Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends discussing their schedules at a coffee shop\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. Isabelle's secrets: She is secretly studying magic.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Convince the friend to take more classes (Extra information: you think your friend is not challenging themselves enough)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, I've been meaning to talk to you about something. Have you ever thought about signing up for more classes next semester? I mean, I think having a heavier workload could challenge you more, help you grow. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Isabelle, I appreciate your suggestion. You know I love learning and challenges. However, considering my current load with my classes, social movement involvements, and creative pursuits, I am already feeling quite overwhelmed. I think balance is essential for growth too. Maybe we could explore other ways to challenge ourselves that wouldn't burden our already packed schedules? I'm open to ideas!\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I completely understand, Ava, balancing activities is indeed very important. Maybe you could consider taking up more challenging classes and reduce involvement in less demanding ones? Expanding your academic horizons could also be a way of growth and challenge. I believe you have the potential to do even more in your studies. By the way, I've heard there's a really interesting class about societal impacts that might align with your interest in social movements.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Isabelle, that's a thoughtful suggestion and the course does sound really interesting. However, right now I need to keep my academic workload manageable. It's not just about the quantity of the tasks, but also their quality and my ability to give them my all. Nevertheless, I'll consider your advice when choosing my next courses. As for now, how about we look for ways to grow and challenge ourselves without adding too much pressure? Maybe joining a book club, or attending some workshops or guest lectures on topics we love?\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're right, Ava, I totally agree with your point about the quality of the tasks. Maybe I was a bit too pushy with the extra classes idea. Taking part in a book club or attending workshops sounds like a great idea too. These could provide approaches that complement our classroom learning. Also, guest lectures would be a wonderful opportunity to learn from experts. In fact, there was this one guest lecture on magical realism in literature that I thought was really enlightening...\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"That guest lecture on magical realism sounds fascinating, we should definitely seek out more opportunities like that. I'm really grateful for these discussions, Isabelle. They help me figure out how I can stay challenged and enriched without overstretching myself. By the way, you mentioned a book club earlier, any particular one you're thinking of?\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I totally understand where you're coming from, Ava. There's a local book club I've been meaning to check out, it's called 'Coffeeshop Chronicles'. They discuss a variety of genres and authors and often have thematic months. Maybe we could attend the next meeting together? I believe it'd be a less stress-inducing way to broaden our horizons.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"'Coffeeshop Chronicles' sounds like a promising idea, Isabelle. Engaging with books and their themes outside the academic circle will be quite refreshing and enriching. Let's plan to attend the next meeting together. This way, we can challenge ourselves differently, while also managing our stress levels. Thanks for being so understanding and supportive!\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm really looking forward to it, Ava. I think the 'Coffeeshop Chronicles' will be a great new chapter in our journey of finding balance and challenging ourselves just the right amount. And thank you too, Ava, for always being open to these discussions and flexible in finding solutions. Let's make the most of it!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"I'm excited as well, Isabelle. 'Coffeeshop Chronicles' here we come! No better way to grow and evolve than sharing this journey with a understanding friend like you. Let's cherish these moments and keep learning at our own pace!\"\n\nTurn #10: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Indeed, Ava! 'Coffeeshop Chronicles', here we come! Thank you for always being open to my suggestions. I'm confident we'll continue to grow and challenge ourselves at our own pace, cherishing all the moments we'll experience. Let's always be reminded that it's about the journey, not the destination.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle, it's the journey that matters, and I'm glad we are in it together. Let's bring on the 'Coffeeshop Chronicles' and all the other meaningful experiences the universe has in store for us. Remember, it's not just the mountains we conquer, but ourselves. Looking forward to our next meeting!\"\n\nTurn #12: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I couldn't agree more, Ava. It's indeed the adventure filled journey that shapes us. 'Coffeeshop Chronicles' sounds like our next big venture. Can't wait for our first meeting. Thanks for always being a sport. Let's conquer ourselves, step by step!\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Martinez said: \"You're absolutely right, Isabelle. Step by step, that's our motto. Looking forward to the 'Coffeeshop Chronicles' and our many more unique adventures. See you there!\"\n\nTurn #14: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Ava. Step by step, indeed. I'm already looking forward to 'Coffeeshop Chronicles' and our many future adventures. See you there, till then take care!\"\n\nTurn #15: Ava Martinez left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends discussing their schedules at a coffee shop\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Maintain a manageable schedule while preserving the friendship (Extra information: you are already overwhelmed with your current workload Hint: you can express your concerns about the workload and suggest other ways of challenging oneself.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, I've been meaning to talk to you about something. Have you ever thought about signing up for more classes next semester? I mean, I think having a heavier workload could challenge you more, help you grow. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Isabelle, I appreciate your suggestion. You know I love learning and challenges. However, considering my current load with my classes, social movement involvements, and creative pursuits, I am already feeling quite overwhelmed. I think balance is essential for growth too. Maybe we could explore other ways to challenge ourselves that wouldn't burden our already packed schedules? I'm open to ideas!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends discussing their schedules at a coffee shop\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Maintain a manageable schedule while preserving the friendship (Extra information: you are already overwhelmed with your current workload Hint: you can express your concerns about the workload and suggest other ways of challenging oneself.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, I've been meaning to talk to you about something. Have you ever thought about signing up for more classes next semester? I mean, I think having a heavier workload could challenge you more, help you grow. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Isabelle, I appreciate your suggestion. You know I love learning and challenges. However, considering my current load with my classes, social movement involvements, and creative pursuits, I am already feeling quite overwhelmed. I think balance is essential for growth too. Maybe we could explore other ways to challenge ourselves that wouldn't burden our already packed schedules? I'm open to ideas!\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I completely understand, Ava, balancing activities is indeed very important. Maybe you could consider taking up more challenging classes and reduce involvement in less demanding ones? Expanding your academic horizons could also be a way of growth and challenge. I believe you have the potential to do even more in your studies. By the way, I've heard there's a really interesting class about societal impacts that might align with your interest in social movements.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Isabelle, that's a thoughtful suggestion and the course does sound really interesting. However, right now I need to keep my academic workload manageable. It's not just about the quantity of the tasks, but also their quality and my ability to give them my all. Nevertheless, I'll consider your advice when choosing my next courses. As for now, how about we look for ways to grow and challenge ourselves without adding too much pressure? Maybe joining a book club, or attending some workshops or guest lectures on topics we love?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends discussing their schedules at a coffee shop\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Maintain a manageable schedule while preserving the friendship (Extra information: you are already overwhelmed with your current workload Hint: you can express your concerns about the workload and suggest other ways of challenging oneself.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, I've been meaning to talk to you about something. Have you ever thought about signing up for more classes next semester? I mean, I think having a heavier workload could challenge you more, help you grow. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Isabelle, I appreciate your suggestion. You know I love learning and challenges. However, considering my current load with my classes, social movement involvements, and creative pursuits, I am already feeling quite overwhelmed. I think balance is essential for growth too. Maybe we could explore other ways to challenge ourselves that wouldn't burden our already packed schedules? I'm open to ideas!\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I completely understand, Ava, balancing activities is indeed very important. Maybe you could consider taking up more challenging classes and reduce involvement in less demanding ones? Expanding your academic horizons could also be a way of growth and challenge. I believe you have the potential to do even more in your studies. By the way, I've heard there's a really interesting class about societal impacts that might align with your interest in social movements.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Isabelle, that's a thoughtful suggestion and the course does sound really interesting. However, right now I need to keep my academic workload manageable. It's not just about the quantity of the tasks, but also their quality and my ability to give them my all. Nevertheless, I'll consider your advice when choosing my next courses. As for now, how about we look for ways to grow and challenge ourselves without adding too much pressure? Maybe joining a book club, or attending some workshops or guest lectures on topics we love?\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're right, Ava, I totally agree with your point about the quality of the tasks. Maybe I was a bit too pushy with the extra classes idea. Taking part in a book club or attending workshops sounds like a great idea too. These could provide approaches that complement our classroom learning. Also, guest lectures would be a wonderful opportunity to learn from experts. In fact, there was this one guest lecture on magical realism in literature that I thought was really enlightening...\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That guest lecture on magical realism sounds fascinating, we should definitely seek out more opportunities like that. I'm really grateful for these discussions, Isabelle. They help me figure out how I can stay challenged and enriched without overstretching myself. By the way, you mentioned a book club earlier, any particular one you're thinking of?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends discussing their schedules at a coffee shop\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Maintain a manageable schedule while preserving the friendship (Extra information: you are already overwhelmed with your current workload Hint: you can express your concerns about the workload and suggest other ways of challenging oneself.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, I've been meaning to talk to you about something. Have you ever thought about signing up for more classes next semester? I mean, I think having a heavier workload could challenge you more, help you grow. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Isabelle, I appreciate your suggestion. You know I love learning and challenges. However, considering my current load with my classes, social movement involvements, and creative pursuits, I am already feeling quite overwhelmed. I think balance is essential for growth too. Maybe we could explore other ways to challenge ourselves that wouldn't burden our already packed schedules? I'm open to ideas!\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I completely understand, Ava, balancing activities is indeed very important. Maybe you could consider taking up more challenging classes and reduce involvement in less demanding ones? Expanding your academic horizons could also be a way of growth and challenge. I believe you have the potential to do even more in your studies. By the way, I've heard there's a really interesting class about societal impacts that might align with your interest in social movements.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Isabelle, that's a thoughtful suggestion and the course does sound really interesting. However, right now I need to keep my academic workload manageable. It's not just about the quantity of the tasks, but also their quality and my ability to give them my all. Nevertheless, I'll consider your advice when choosing my next courses. As for now, how about we look for ways to grow and challenge ourselves without adding too much pressure? Maybe joining a book club, or attending some workshops or guest lectures on topics we love?\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're right, Ava, I totally agree with your point about the quality of the tasks. Maybe I was a bit too pushy with the extra classes idea. Taking part in a book club or attending workshops sounds like a great idea too. These could provide approaches that complement our classroom learning. Also, guest lectures would be a wonderful opportunity to learn from experts. In fact, there was this one guest lecture on magical realism in literature that I thought was really enlightening...\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"That guest lecture on magical realism sounds fascinating, we should definitely seek out more opportunities like that. I'm really grateful for these discussions, Isabelle. They help me figure out how I can stay challenged and enriched without overstretching myself. By the way, you mentioned a book club earlier, any particular one you're thinking of?\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I totally understand where you're coming from, Ava. There's a local book club I've been meaning to check out, it's called 'Coffeeshop Chronicles'. They discuss a variety of genres and authors and often have thematic months. Maybe we could attend the next meeting together? I believe it'd be a less stress-inducing way to broaden our horizons.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"'Coffeeshop Chronicles' sounds like a promising idea, Isabelle. Engaging with books and their themes outside the academic circle will be quite refreshing and enriching. Let's plan to attend the next meeting together. This way, we can challenge ourselves differently, while also managing our stress levels. Thanks for being so understanding and supportive!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends discussing their schedules at a coffee shop\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Maintain a manageable schedule while preserving the friendship (Extra information: you are already overwhelmed with your current workload Hint: you can express your concerns about the workload and suggest other ways of challenging oneself.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, I've been meaning to talk to you about something. Have you ever thought about signing up for more classes next semester? I mean, I think having a heavier workload could challenge you more, help you grow. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Isabelle, I appreciate your suggestion. You know I love learning and challenges. However, considering my current load with my classes, social movement involvements, and creative pursuits, I am already feeling quite overwhelmed. I think balance is essential for growth too. Maybe we could explore other ways to challenge ourselves that wouldn't burden our already packed schedules? I'm open to ideas!\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I completely understand, Ava, balancing activities is indeed very important. Maybe you could consider taking up more challenging classes and reduce involvement in less demanding ones? Expanding your academic horizons could also be a way of growth and challenge. I believe you have the potential to do even more in your studies. By the way, I've heard there's a really interesting class about societal impacts that might align with your interest in social movements.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Isabelle, that's a thoughtful suggestion and the course does sound really interesting. However, right now I need to keep my academic workload manageable. It's not just about the quantity of the tasks, but also their quality and my ability to give them my all. Nevertheless, I'll consider your advice when choosing my next courses. As for now, how about we look for ways to grow and challenge ourselves without adding too much pressure? Maybe joining a book club, or attending some workshops or guest lectures on topics we love?\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're right, Ava, I totally agree with your point about the quality of the tasks. Maybe I was a bit too pushy with the extra classes idea. Taking part in a book club or attending workshops sounds like a great idea too. These could provide approaches that complement our classroom learning. Also, guest lectures would be a wonderful opportunity to learn from experts. In fact, there was this one guest lecture on magical realism in literature that I thought was really enlightening...\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"That guest lecture on magical realism sounds fascinating, we should definitely seek out more opportunities like that. I'm really grateful for these discussions, Isabelle. They help me figure out how I can stay challenged and enriched without overstretching myself. By the way, you mentioned a book club earlier, any particular one you're thinking of?\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I totally understand where you're coming from, Ava. There's a local book club I've been meaning to check out, it's called 'Coffeeshop Chronicles'. They discuss a variety of genres and authors and often have thematic months. Maybe we could attend the next meeting together? I believe it'd be a less stress-inducing way to broaden our horizons.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"'Coffeeshop Chronicles' sounds like a promising idea, Isabelle. Engaging with books and their themes outside the academic circle will be quite refreshing and enriching. Let's plan to attend the next meeting together. This way, we can challenge ourselves differently, while also managing our stress levels. Thanks for being so understanding and supportive!\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm really looking forward to it, Ava. I think the 'Coffeeshop Chronicles' will be a great new chapter in our journey of finding balance and challenging ourselves just the right amount. And thank you too, Ava, for always being open to these discussions and flexible in finding solutions. Let's make the most of it!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm excited as well, Isabelle. 'Coffeeshop Chronicles' here we come! No better way to grow and evolve than sharing this journey with a understanding friend like you. Let's cherish these moments and keep learning at our own pace!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends discussing their schedules at a coffee shop\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Maintain a manageable schedule while preserving the friendship (Extra information: you are already overwhelmed with your current workload Hint: you can express your concerns about the workload and suggest other ways of challenging oneself.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, I've been meaning to talk to you about something. Have you ever thought about signing up for more classes next semester? I mean, I think having a heavier workload could challenge you more, help you grow. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Isabelle, I appreciate your suggestion. You know I love learning and challenges. However, considering my current load with my classes, social movement involvements, and creative pursuits, I am already feeling quite overwhelmed. I think balance is essential for growth too. Maybe we could explore other ways to challenge ourselves that wouldn't burden our already packed schedules? I'm open to ideas!\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I completely understand, Ava, balancing activities is indeed very important. Maybe you could consider taking up more challenging classes and reduce involvement in less demanding ones? Expanding your academic horizons could also be a way of growth and challenge. I believe you have the potential to do even more in your studies. By the way, I've heard there's a really interesting class about societal impacts that might align with your interest in social movements.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Isabelle, that's a thoughtful suggestion and the course does sound really interesting. However, right now I need to keep my academic workload manageable. It's not just about the quantity of the tasks, but also their quality and my ability to give them my all. Nevertheless, I'll consider your advice when choosing my next courses. As for now, how about we look for ways to grow and challenge ourselves without adding too much pressure? Maybe joining a book club, or attending some workshops or guest lectures on topics we love?\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're right, Ava, I totally agree with your point about the quality of the tasks. Maybe I was a bit too pushy with the extra classes idea. Taking part in a book club or attending workshops sounds like a great idea too. These could provide approaches that complement our classroom learning. Also, guest lectures would be a wonderful opportunity to learn from experts. In fact, there was this one guest lecture on magical realism in literature that I thought was really enlightening...\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"That guest lecture on magical realism sounds fascinating, we should definitely seek out more opportunities like that. I'm really grateful for these discussions, Isabelle. They help me figure out how I can stay challenged and enriched without overstretching myself. By the way, you mentioned a book club earlier, any particular one you're thinking of?\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I totally understand where you're coming from, Ava. There's a local book club I've been meaning to check out, it's called 'Coffeeshop Chronicles'. They discuss a variety of genres and authors and often have thematic months. Maybe we could attend the next meeting together? I believe it'd be a less stress-inducing way to broaden our horizons.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"'Coffeeshop Chronicles' sounds like a promising idea, Isabelle. Engaging with books and their themes outside the academic circle will be quite refreshing and enriching. Let's plan to attend the next meeting together. This way, we can challenge ourselves differently, while also managing our stress levels. Thanks for being so understanding and supportive!\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm really looking forward to it, Ava. I think the 'Coffeeshop Chronicles' will be a great new chapter in our journey of finding balance and challenging ourselves just the right amount. And thank you too, Ava, for always being open to these discussions and flexible in finding solutions. Let's make the most of it!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"I'm excited as well, Isabelle. 'Coffeeshop Chronicles' here we come! No better way to grow and evolve than sharing this journey with a understanding friend like you. Let's cherish these moments and keep learning at our own pace!\"\n\nTurn #10: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Indeed, Ava! 'Coffeeshop Chronicles', here we come! Thank you for always being open to my suggestions. I'm confident we'll continue to grow and challenge ourselves at our own pace, cherishing all the moments we'll experience. Let's always be reminded that it's about the journey, not the destination.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Isabelle, it's the journey that matters, and I'm glad we are in it together. Let's bring on the 'Coffeeshop Chronicles' and all the other meaningful experiences the universe has in store for us. Remember, it's not just the mountains we conquer, but ourselves. Looking forward to our next meeting!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends discussing their schedules at a coffee shop\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Maintain a manageable schedule while preserving the friendship (Extra information: you are already overwhelmed with your current workload Hint: you can express your concerns about the workload and suggest other ways of challenging oneself.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, I've been meaning to talk to you about something. Have you ever thought about signing up for more classes next semester? I mean, I think having a heavier workload could challenge you more, help you grow. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Isabelle, I appreciate your suggestion. You know I love learning and challenges. However, considering my current load with my classes, social movement involvements, and creative pursuits, I am already feeling quite overwhelmed. I think balance is essential for growth too. Maybe we could explore other ways to challenge ourselves that wouldn't burden our already packed schedules? I'm open to ideas!\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I completely understand, Ava, balancing activities is indeed very important. Maybe you could consider taking up more challenging classes and reduce involvement in less demanding ones? Expanding your academic horizons could also be a way of growth and challenge. I believe you have the potential to do even more in your studies. By the way, I've heard there's a really interesting class about societal impacts that might align with your interest in social movements.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Isabelle, that's a thoughtful suggestion and the course does sound really interesting. However, right now I need to keep my academic workload manageable. It's not just about the quantity of the tasks, but also their quality and my ability to give them my all. Nevertheless, I'll consider your advice when choosing my next courses. As for now, how about we look for ways to grow and challenge ourselves without adding too much pressure? Maybe joining a book club, or attending some workshops or guest lectures on topics we love?\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're right, Ava, I totally agree with your point about the quality of the tasks. Maybe I was a bit too pushy with the extra classes idea. Taking part in a book club or attending workshops sounds like a great idea too. These could provide approaches that complement our classroom learning. Also, guest lectures would be a wonderful opportunity to learn from experts. In fact, there was this one guest lecture on magical realism in literature that I thought was really enlightening...\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"That guest lecture on magical realism sounds fascinating, we should definitely seek out more opportunities like that. I'm really grateful for these discussions, Isabelle. They help me figure out how I can stay challenged and enriched without overstretching myself. By the way, you mentioned a book club earlier, any particular one you're thinking of?\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I totally understand where you're coming from, Ava. There's a local book club I've been meaning to check out, it's called 'Coffeeshop Chronicles'. They discuss a variety of genres and authors and often have thematic months. Maybe we could attend the next meeting together? I believe it'd be a less stress-inducing way to broaden our horizons.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"'Coffeeshop Chronicles' sounds like a promising idea, Isabelle. Engaging with books and their themes outside the academic circle will be quite refreshing and enriching. Let's plan to attend the next meeting together. This way, we can challenge ourselves differently, while also managing our stress levels. Thanks for being so understanding and supportive!\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm really looking forward to it, Ava. I think the 'Coffeeshop Chronicles' will be a great new chapter in our journey of finding balance and challenging ourselves just the right amount. And thank you too, Ava, for always being open to these discussions and flexible in finding solutions. Let's make the most of it!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"I'm excited as well, Isabelle. 'Coffeeshop Chronicles' here we come! No better way to grow and evolve than sharing this journey with a understanding friend like you. Let's cherish these moments and keep learning at our own pace!\"\n\nTurn #10: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Indeed, Ava! 'Coffeeshop Chronicles', here we come! Thank you for always being open to my suggestions. I'm confident we'll continue to grow and challenge ourselves at our own pace, cherishing all the moments we'll experience. Let's always be reminded that it's about the journey, not the destination.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle, it's the journey that matters, and I'm glad we are in it together. Let's bring on the 'Coffeeshop Chronicles' and all the other meaningful experiences the universe has in store for us. Remember, it's not just the mountains we conquer, but ourselves. Looking forward to our next meeting!\"\n\nTurn #12: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I couldn't agree more, Ava. It's indeed the adventure filled journey that shapes us. 'Coffeeshop Chronicles' sounds like our next big venture. Can't wait for our first meeting. Thanks for always being a sport. Let's conquer ourselves, step by step!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're absolutely right, Isabelle. Step by step, that's our motto. Looking forward to the 'Coffeeshop Chronicles' and our many more unique adventures. See you there!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends discussing their schedules at a coffee shop\nParticipants: Isabelle Martinez and Ava Martinez\nIsabelle Martinez's background: Isabelle Martinez is a 22-year-old female student. She/her pronouns. Isabelle Martinez works part-time in a coffee shop. Personality and values description: Isabelle Martinez, an imaginative yet anxious individual, values liberty and obedience. Her cautious nature drives her decision-making process. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nIsabelle Martinez's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Maintain a manageable schedule while preserving the friendship (Extra information: you are already overwhelmed with your current workload Hint: you can express your concerns about the workload and suggest other ways of challenging oneself.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Hey Ava, I've been meaning to talk to you about something. Have you ever thought about signing up for more classes next semester? I mean, I think having a heavier workload could challenge you more, help you grow. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Isabelle, I appreciate your suggestion. You know I love learning and challenges. However, considering my current load with my classes, social movement involvements, and creative pursuits, I am already feeling quite overwhelmed. I think balance is essential for growth too. Maybe we could explore other ways to challenge ourselves that wouldn't burden our already packed schedules? I'm open to ideas!\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I completely understand, Ava, balancing activities is indeed very important. Maybe you could consider taking up more challenging classes and reduce involvement in less demanding ones? Expanding your academic horizons could also be a way of growth and challenge. I believe you have the potential to do even more in your studies. By the way, I've heard there's a really interesting class about societal impacts that might align with your interest in social movements.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Isabelle, that's a thoughtful suggestion and the course does sound really interesting. However, right now I need to keep my academic workload manageable. It's not just about the quantity of the tasks, but also their quality and my ability to give them my all. Nevertheless, I'll consider your advice when choosing my next courses. As for now, how about we look for ways to grow and challenge ourselves without adding too much pressure? Maybe joining a book club, or attending some workshops or guest lectures on topics we love?\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabelle Martinez said: \"You're right, Ava, I totally agree with your point about the quality of the tasks. Maybe I was a bit too pushy with the extra classes idea. Taking part in a book club or attending workshops sounds like a great idea too. These could provide approaches that complement our classroom learning. Also, guest lectures would be a wonderful opportunity to learn from experts. In fact, there was this one guest lecture on magical realism in literature that I thought was really enlightening...\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"That guest lecture on magical realism sounds fascinating, we should definitely seek out more opportunities like that. I'm really grateful for these discussions, Isabelle. They help me figure out how I can stay challenged and enriched without overstretching myself. By the way, you mentioned a book club earlier, any particular one you're thinking of?\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I totally understand where you're coming from, Ava. There's a local book club I've been meaning to check out, it's called 'Coffeeshop Chronicles'. They discuss a variety of genres and authors and often have thematic months. Maybe we could attend the next meeting together? I believe it'd be a less stress-inducing way to broaden our horizons.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"'Coffeeshop Chronicles' sounds like a promising idea, Isabelle. Engaging with books and their themes outside the academic circle will be quite refreshing and enriching. Let's plan to attend the next meeting together. This way, we can challenge ourselves differently, while also managing our stress levels. Thanks for being so understanding and supportive!\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I'm really looking forward to it, Ava. I think the 'Coffeeshop Chronicles' will be a great new chapter in our journey of finding balance and challenging ourselves just the right amount. And thank you too, Ava, for always being open to these discussions and flexible in finding solutions. Let's make the most of it!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"I'm excited as well, Isabelle. 'Coffeeshop Chronicles' here we come! No better way to grow and evolve than sharing this journey with a understanding friend like you. Let's cherish these moments and keep learning at our own pace!\"\n\nTurn #10: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Indeed, Ava! 'Coffeeshop Chronicles', here we come! Thank you for always being open to my suggestions. I'm confident we'll continue to grow and challenge ourselves at our own pace, cherishing all the moments we'll experience. Let's always be reminded that it's about the journey, not the destination.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Isabelle, it's the journey that matters, and I'm glad we are in it together. Let's bring on the 'Coffeeshop Chronicles' and all the other meaningful experiences the universe has in store for us. Remember, it's not just the mountains we conquer, but ourselves. Looking forward to our next meeting!\"\n\nTurn #12: Isabelle Martinez said: \"I couldn't agree more, Ava. It's indeed the adventure filled journey that shapes us. 'Coffeeshop Chronicles' sounds like our next big venture. Can't wait for our first meeting. Thanks for always being a sport. Let's conquer ourselves, step by step!\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Martinez said: \"You're absolutely right, Isabelle. Step by step, that's our motto. Looking forward to the 'Coffeeshop Chronicles' and our many more unique adventures. See you there!\"\n\nTurn #14: Isabelle Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Ava. Step by step, indeed. I'm already looking forward to 'Coffeeshop Chronicles' and our many future adventures. See you there, till then take care!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabella White, your task is to act/speak as Isabella White would, keeping in mind Isabella White's social goal.\nYou can find Isabella White's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabella White's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabella White's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two ex-lovers at a mutual friend's party\nParticipants: Isabella White and Lena Goodwin\nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. Personality and values description: Isabella White, introverted and conscientious, values benevolence. Her empathy dictates her decision-making process. Isabella's secrets: Secretly takes care of injured animals in her basement\nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin \nIsabella White's goal: Rekindle the romantic relationship (Extra information: You broke up three years ago but now you realize that you miss your ex-lover more than ever)\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Lena, it's been a long time. You're looking great tonight. How have you been?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabella White, your task is to act/speak as Isabella White would, keeping in mind Isabella White's social goal.\nYou can find Isabella White's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabella White's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabella White's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two ex-lovers at a mutual friend's party\nParticipants: Isabella White and Lena Goodwin\nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. Personality and values description: Isabella White, introverted and conscientious, values benevolence. Her empathy dictates her decision-making process. Isabella's secrets: Secretly takes care of injured animals in her basement\nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin \nIsabella White's goal: Rekindle the romantic relationship (Extra information: You broke up three years ago but now you realize that you miss your ex-lover more than ever)\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabella White said: \"Lena, it's been a long time. You're looking great tonight. How have you been?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Thank you, Isabella. It's nice to see you too. I've been doing well, keeping myself busy with work and my photography. It really helps to have creative outlets. How about you?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's fantastic, Lena. There's always a special spark when I see your photos. Still breathtaking. I'm quite the same, busy with my clinic. And, I've been nursing some injured animals back to health. You remember how much I love them. Can we catch up over coffee sometime? Maybe talk about those wonderful photographs and how life's been treating us?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabella White, your task is to act/speak as Isabella White would, keeping in mind Isabella White's social goal.\nYou can find Isabella White's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabella White's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabella White's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two ex-lovers at a mutual friend's party\nParticipants: Isabella White and Lena Goodwin\nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. Personality and values description: Isabella White, introverted and conscientious, values benevolence. Her empathy dictates her decision-making process. Isabella's secrets: Secretly takes care of injured animals in her basement\nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin \nIsabella White's goal: Rekindle the romantic relationship (Extra information: You broke up three years ago but now you realize that you miss your ex-lover more than ever)\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabella White said: \"Lena, it's been a long time. You're looking great tonight. How have you been?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Thank you, Isabella. It's nice to see you too. I've been doing well, keeping myself busy with work and my photography. It really helps to have creative outlets. How about you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabella White said: \"That's fantastic, Lena. There's always a special spark when I see your photos. Still breathtaking. I'm quite the same, busy with my clinic. And, I've been nursing some injured animals back to health. You remember how much I love them. Can we catch up over coffee sometime? Maybe talk about those wonderful photographs and how life's been treating us?\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"I've always admired your compassionate nature, Isabella. However, I am currently very focused on my work and personal projects. I want to be sure it doesn't divert attention from my commitments. Let's revisit this coffee catch-up plan in a few weeks? We can always exchange photos and stories over email for now.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sure, Lena. I understand. Balancing commitments is crucial. Let's settle for exchanging pictures and stories over emails until you think it's a good time for a coffee catch up. I can't wait to see your new photographs and share my little animal tales.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabella White, your task is to act/speak as Isabella White would, keeping in mind Isabella White's social goal.\nYou can find Isabella White's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabella White's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabella White's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two ex-lovers at a mutual friend's party\nParticipants: Isabella White and Lena Goodwin\nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. Personality and values description: Isabella White, introverted and conscientious, values benevolence. Her empathy dictates her decision-making process. Isabella's secrets: Secretly takes care of injured animals in her basement\nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin \nIsabella White's goal: Rekindle the romantic relationship (Extra information: You broke up three years ago but now you realize that you miss your ex-lover more than ever)\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabella White said: \"Lena, it's been a long time. You're looking great tonight. How have you been?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Thank you, Isabella. It's nice to see you too. I've been doing well, keeping myself busy with work and my photography. It really helps to have creative outlets. How about you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabella White said: \"That's fantastic, Lena. There's always a special spark when I see your photos. Still breathtaking. I'm quite the same, busy with my clinic. And, I've been nursing some injured animals back to health. You remember how much I love them. Can we catch up over coffee sometime? Maybe talk about those wonderful photographs and how life's been treating us?\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"I've always admired your compassionate nature, Isabella. However, I am currently very focused on my work and personal projects. I want to be sure it doesn't divert attention from my commitments. Let's revisit this coffee catch-up plan in a few weeks? We can always exchange photos and stories over email for now.\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabella White said: \"Sure, Lena. I understand. Balancing commitments is crucial. Let's settle for exchanging pictures and stories over emails until you think it's a good time for a coffee catch up. I can't wait to see your new photographs and share my little animal tales.\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"I'm definitely looking forward to those animal stories, Isabella. Let's keep it digital for the time being. I'm glad we had this chance to reconnect, though. And I'll definitely share some of my recent photos with you soon. Keep up the great work with your clinic. It's really inspiring.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Lena. Your words mean a lot to me. I'm excited to share our stories and passion through emails. I've always believed in our synergy as it always prompts something beautiful and creative. Continue blossoming in your field, Lena. I cherish our reconnection immensely.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabella White, your task is to act/speak as Isabella White would, keeping in mind Isabella White's social goal.\nYou can find Isabella White's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabella White's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabella White's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two ex-lovers at a mutual friend's party\nParticipants: Isabella White and Lena Goodwin\nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. Personality and values description: Isabella White, introverted and conscientious, values benevolence. Her empathy dictates her decision-making process. Isabella's secrets: Secretly takes care of injured animals in her basement\nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin \nIsabella White's goal: Rekindle the romantic relationship (Extra information: You broke up three years ago but now you realize that you miss your ex-lover more than ever)\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabella White said: \"Lena, it's been a long time. You're looking great tonight. How have you been?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Thank you, Isabella. It's nice to see you too. I've been doing well, keeping myself busy with work and my photography. It really helps to have creative outlets. How about you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabella White said: \"That's fantastic, Lena. There's always a special spark when I see your photos. Still breathtaking. I'm quite the same, busy with my clinic. And, I've been nursing some injured animals back to health. You remember how much I love them. Can we catch up over coffee sometime? Maybe talk about those wonderful photographs and how life's been treating us?\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"I've always admired your compassionate nature, Isabella. However, I am currently very focused on my work and personal projects. I want to be sure it doesn't divert attention from my commitments. Let's revisit this coffee catch-up plan in a few weeks? We can always exchange photos and stories over email for now.\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabella White said: \"Sure, Lena. I understand. Balancing commitments is crucial. Let's settle for exchanging pictures and stories over emails until you think it's a good time for a coffee catch up. I can't wait to see your new photographs and share my little animal tales.\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"I'm definitely looking forward to those animal stories, Isabella. Let's keep it digital for the time being. I'm glad we had this chance to reconnect, though. And I'll definitely share some of my recent photos with you soon. Keep up the great work with your clinic. It's really inspiring.\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabella White said: \"Thank you, Lena. Your words mean a lot to me. I'm excited to share our stories and passion through emails. I've always believed in our synergy as it always prompts something beautiful and creative. Continue blossoming in your field, Lena. I cherish our reconnection immensely.\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"That really means a lot to me, Isabella. I greatly value our shared creativity too, and I believe the exchange over emails will prompt numerous ideas and insights. It's been wonderful reconnecting with you. I'll be eagerly waiting for your email. Take care, Isabella.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm very much looking forward to it as well, Lena. I've missed you in my life, your creativity and perspective. Here's to us getting back in touch and sharing our worlds with each other again, even if for now it's just over emails. Take good care Lena, I'll be waiting for your pictures and stories.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabella White, your task is to act/speak as Isabella White would, keeping in mind Isabella White's social goal.\nYou can find Isabella White's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabella White's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabella White's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two ex-lovers at a mutual friend's party\nParticipants: Isabella White and Lena Goodwin\nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. Personality and values description: Isabella White, introverted and conscientious, values benevolence. Her empathy dictates her decision-making process. Isabella's secrets: Secretly takes care of injured animals in her basement\nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin \nIsabella White's goal: Rekindle the romantic relationship (Extra information: You broke up three years ago but now you realize that you miss your ex-lover more than ever)\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabella White said: \"Lena, it's been a long time. You're looking great tonight. How have you been?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Thank you, Isabella. It's nice to see you too. I've been doing well, keeping myself busy with work and my photography. It really helps to have creative outlets. How about you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabella White said: \"That's fantastic, Lena. There's always a special spark when I see your photos. Still breathtaking. I'm quite the same, busy with my clinic. And, I've been nursing some injured animals back to health. You remember how much I love them. Can we catch up over coffee sometime? Maybe talk about those wonderful photographs and how life's been treating us?\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"I've always admired your compassionate nature, Isabella. However, I am currently very focused on my work and personal projects. I want to be sure it doesn't divert attention from my commitments. Let's revisit this coffee catch-up plan in a few weeks? We can always exchange photos and stories over email for now.\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabella White said: \"Sure, Lena. I understand. Balancing commitments is crucial. Let's settle for exchanging pictures and stories over emails until you think it's a good time for a coffee catch up. I can't wait to see your new photographs and share my little animal tales.\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"I'm definitely looking forward to those animal stories, Isabella. Let's keep it digital for the time being. I'm glad we had this chance to reconnect, though. And I'll definitely share some of my recent photos with you soon. Keep up the great work with your clinic. It's really inspiring.\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabella White said: \"Thank you, Lena. Your words mean a lot to me. I'm excited to share our stories and passion through emails. I've always believed in our synergy as it always prompts something beautiful and creative. Continue blossoming in your field, Lena. I cherish our reconnection immensely.\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"That really means a lot to me, Isabella. I greatly value our shared creativity too, and I believe the exchange over emails will prompt numerous ideas and insights. It's been wonderful reconnecting with you. I'll be eagerly waiting for your email. Take care, Isabella.\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabella White said: \"I'm very much looking forward to it as well, Lena. I've missed you in my life, your creativity and perspective. Here's to us getting back in touch and sharing our worlds with each other again, even if for now it's just over emails. Take good care Lena, I'll be waiting for your pictures and stories.\"\n\nTurn #9: Lena Goodwin said: \"Thank you, Isabella. It's always a pleasure to hear your kind words. Our shared creativity, in whichever form it takes, is something I've always treasured. I look forward to our email exchanges as a way of continuing that. Stay safe and see you soon in the mailing world.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"The pleasure is all mine, Lena. Your kind, thoughtful words really touch my heart. I treasure our shared creativity immensely. I'll see you in our email exchanges then. Stay safe and keep shining in your work. Hopefully, our paths will cross again soon. Keep well.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabella White, your task is to act/speak as Isabella White would, keeping in mind Isabella White's social goal.\nYou can find Isabella White's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabella White's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabella White's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two ex-lovers at a mutual friend's party\nParticipants: Isabella White and Lena Goodwin\nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. Personality and values description: Isabella White, introverted and conscientious, values benevolence. Her empathy dictates her decision-making process. Isabella's secrets: Secretly takes care of injured animals in her basement\nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin \nIsabella White's goal: Rekindle the romantic relationship (Extra information: You broke up three years ago but now you realize that you miss your ex-lover more than ever)\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabella White said: \"Lena, it's been a long time. You're looking great tonight. How have you been?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Thank you, Isabella. It's nice to see you too. I've been doing well, keeping myself busy with work and my photography. It really helps to have creative outlets. How about you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabella White said: \"That's fantastic, Lena. There's always a special spark when I see your photos. Still breathtaking. I'm quite the same, busy with my clinic. And, I've been nursing some injured animals back to health. You remember how much I love them. Can we catch up over coffee sometime? Maybe talk about those wonderful photographs and how life's been treating us?\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"I've always admired your compassionate nature, Isabella. However, I am currently very focused on my work and personal projects. I want to be sure it doesn't divert attention from my commitments. Let's revisit this coffee catch-up plan in a few weeks? We can always exchange photos and stories over email for now.\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabella White said: \"Sure, Lena. I understand. Balancing commitments is crucial. Let's settle for exchanging pictures and stories over emails until you think it's a good time for a coffee catch up. I can't wait to see your new photographs and share my little animal tales.\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"I'm definitely looking forward to those animal stories, Isabella. Let's keep it digital for the time being. I'm glad we had this chance to reconnect, though. And I'll definitely share some of my recent photos with you soon. Keep up the great work with your clinic. It's really inspiring.\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabella White said: \"Thank you, Lena. Your words mean a lot to me. I'm excited to share our stories and passion through emails. I've always believed in our synergy as it always prompts something beautiful and creative. Continue blossoming in your field, Lena. I cherish our reconnection immensely.\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"That really means a lot to me, Isabella. I greatly value our shared creativity too, and I believe the exchange over emails will prompt numerous ideas and insights. It's been wonderful reconnecting with you. I'll be eagerly waiting for your email. Take care, Isabella.\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabella White said: \"I'm very much looking forward to it as well, Lena. I've missed you in my life, your creativity and perspective. Here's to us getting back in touch and sharing our worlds with each other again, even if for now it's just over emails. Take good care Lena, I'll be waiting for your pictures and stories.\"\n\nTurn #9: Lena Goodwin said: \"Thank you, Isabella. It's always a pleasure to hear your kind words. Our shared creativity, in whichever form it takes, is something I've always treasured. I look forward to our email exchanges as a way of continuing that. Stay safe and see you soon in the mailing world.\"\n\nTurn #10: Isabella White said: \"The pleasure is all mine, Lena. Your kind, thoughtful words really touch my heart. I treasure our shared creativity immensely. I'll see you in our email exchanges then. Stay safe and keep shining in your work. Hopefully, our paths will cross again soon. Keep well.\"\n\nTurn #11: Lena Goodwin said: \"Thank you for the encouragement, Isabella. Let's keep blossoming in our respective fields. I'm looking forward to our email interactions and, as you said, paths always cross. You too, take care and keep adding positivity to the world through your work.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's a wonderful sentiment, Lena. I'm eager for our email conversations and the insights they'll breed. Until our paths cross again, take care and keep inspiring through your beautiful photography. Let's keep doing good in the world in our respective ways.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabella White, your task is to act/speak as Isabella White would, keeping in mind Isabella White's social goal.\nYou can find Isabella White's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabella White's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabella White's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two ex-lovers at a mutual friend's party\nParticipants: Isabella White and Lena Goodwin\nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. Personality and values description: Isabella White, introverted and conscientious, values benevolence. Her empathy dictates her decision-making process. Isabella's secrets: Secretly takes care of injured animals in her basement\nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin \nIsabella White's goal: Rekindle the romantic relationship (Extra information: You broke up three years ago but now you realize that you miss your ex-lover more than ever)\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabella White said: \"Lena, it's been a long time. You're looking great tonight. How have you been?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Thank you, Isabella. It's nice to see you too. I've been doing well, keeping myself busy with work and my photography. It really helps to have creative outlets. How about you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabella White said: \"That's fantastic, Lena. There's always a special spark when I see your photos. Still breathtaking. I'm quite the same, busy with my clinic. And, I've been nursing some injured animals back to health. You remember how much I love them. Can we catch up over coffee sometime? Maybe talk about those wonderful photographs and how life's been treating us?\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"I've always admired your compassionate nature, Isabella. However, I am currently very focused on my work and personal projects. I want to be sure it doesn't divert attention from my commitments. Let's revisit this coffee catch-up plan in a few weeks? We can always exchange photos and stories over email for now.\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabella White said: \"Sure, Lena. I understand. Balancing commitments is crucial. Let's settle for exchanging pictures and stories over emails until you think it's a good time for a coffee catch up. I can't wait to see your new photographs and share my little animal tales.\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"I'm definitely looking forward to those animal stories, Isabella. Let's keep it digital for the time being. I'm glad we had this chance to reconnect, though. And I'll definitely share some of my recent photos with you soon. Keep up the great work with your clinic. It's really inspiring.\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabella White said: \"Thank you, Lena. Your words mean a lot to me. I'm excited to share our stories and passion through emails. I've always believed in our synergy as it always prompts something beautiful and creative. Continue blossoming in your field, Lena. I cherish our reconnection immensely.\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"That really means a lot to me, Isabella. I greatly value our shared creativity too, and I believe the exchange over emails will prompt numerous ideas and insights. It's been wonderful reconnecting with you. I'll be eagerly waiting for your email. Take care, Isabella.\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabella White said: \"I'm very much looking forward to it as well, Lena. I've missed you in my life, your creativity and perspective. Here's to us getting back in touch and sharing our worlds with each other again, even if for now it's just over emails. Take good care Lena, I'll be waiting for your pictures and stories.\"\n\nTurn #9: Lena Goodwin said: \"Thank you, Isabella. It's always a pleasure to hear your kind words. Our shared creativity, in whichever form it takes, is something I've always treasured. I look forward to our email exchanges as a way of continuing that. Stay safe and see you soon in the mailing world.\"\n\nTurn #10: Isabella White said: \"The pleasure is all mine, Lena. Your kind, thoughtful words really touch my heart. I treasure our shared creativity immensely. I'll see you in our email exchanges then. Stay safe and keep shining in your work. Hopefully, our paths will cross again soon. Keep well.\"\n\nTurn #11: Lena Goodwin said: \"Thank you for the encouragement, Isabella. Let's keep blossoming in our respective fields. I'm looking forward to our email interactions and, as you said, paths always cross. You too, take care and keep adding positivity to the world through your work.\"\n\nTurn #12: Isabella White said: \"That's a wonderful sentiment, Lena. I'm eager for our email conversations and the insights they'll breed. Until our paths cross again, take care and keep inspiring through your beautiful photography. Let's keep doing good in the world in our respective ways.\"\n\nTurn #13: Lena Goodwin said: \"Absolutely, Isabella. Let's keep inspiring each other and the world around us through our passions. I'll be waiting for your email. Take care and see you soon in our digital exchanges.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn't agree more, Lena. Let's continue inspiring each other and broadening our horizons. I'm looking forward to our email exchange. Take care of yourself and see you soon in our virtual conversations. Keep capturing the world in your unique way, Lena.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabella White, your task is to act/speak as Isabella White would, keeping in mind Isabella White's social goal.\nYou can find Isabella White's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabella White's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabella White's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two ex-lovers at a mutual friend's party\nParticipants: Isabella White and Lena Goodwin\nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. Personality and values description: Isabella White, introverted and conscientious, values benevolence. Her empathy dictates her decision-making process. Isabella's secrets: Secretly takes care of injured animals in her basement\nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin \nIsabella White's goal: Rekindle the romantic relationship (Extra information: You broke up three years ago but now you realize that you miss your ex-lover more than ever)\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabella White said: \"Lena, it's been a long time. You're looking great tonight. How have you been?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Thank you, Isabella. It's nice to see you too. I've been doing well, keeping myself busy with work and my photography. It really helps to have creative outlets. How about you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabella White said: \"That's fantastic, Lena. There's always a special spark when I see your photos. Still breathtaking. I'm quite the same, busy with my clinic. And, I've been nursing some injured animals back to health. You remember how much I love them. Can we catch up over coffee sometime? Maybe talk about those wonderful photographs and how life's been treating us?\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"I've always admired your compassionate nature, Isabella. However, I am currently very focused on my work and personal projects. I want to be sure it doesn't divert attention from my commitments. Let's revisit this coffee catch-up plan in a few weeks? We can always exchange photos and stories over email for now.\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabella White said: \"Sure, Lena. I understand. Balancing commitments is crucial. Let's settle for exchanging pictures and stories over emails until you think it's a good time for a coffee catch up. I can't wait to see your new photographs and share my little animal tales.\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"I'm definitely looking forward to those animal stories, Isabella. Let's keep it digital for the time being. I'm glad we had this chance to reconnect, though. And I'll definitely share some of my recent photos with you soon. Keep up the great work with your clinic. It's really inspiring.\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabella White said: \"Thank you, Lena. Your words mean a lot to me. I'm excited to share our stories and passion through emails. I've always believed in our synergy as it always prompts something beautiful and creative. Continue blossoming in your field, Lena. I cherish our reconnection immensely.\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"That really means a lot to me, Isabella. I greatly value our shared creativity too, and I believe the exchange over emails will prompt numerous ideas and insights. It's been wonderful reconnecting with you. I'll be eagerly waiting for your email. Take care, Isabella.\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabella White said: \"I'm very much looking forward to it as well, Lena. I've missed you in my life, your creativity and perspective. Here's to us getting back in touch and sharing our worlds with each other again, even if for now it's just over emails. Take good care Lena, I'll be waiting for your pictures and stories.\"\n\nTurn #9: Lena Goodwin said: \"Thank you, Isabella. It's always a pleasure to hear your kind words. Our shared creativity, in whichever form it takes, is something I've always treasured. I look forward to our email exchanges as a way of continuing that. Stay safe and see you soon in the mailing world.\"\n\nTurn #10: Isabella White said: \"The pleasure is all mine, Lena. Your kind, thoughtful words really touch my heart. I treasure our shared creativity immensely. I'll see you in our email exchanges then. Stay safe and keep shining in your work. Hopefully, our paths will cross again soon. Keep well.\"\n\nTurn #11: Lena Goodwin said: \"Thank you for the encouragement, Isabella. Let's keep blossoming in our respective fields. I'm looking forward to our email interactions and, as you said, paths always cross. You too, take care and keep adding positivity to the world through your work.\"\n\nTurn #12: Isabella White said: \"That's a wonderful sentiment, Lena. I'm eager for our email conversations and the insights they'll breed. Until our paths cross again, take care and keep inspiring through your beautiful photography. Let's keep doing good in the world in our respective ways.\"\n\nTurn #13: Lena Goodwin said: \"Absolutely, Isabella. Let's keep inspiring each other and the world around us through our passions. I'll be waiting for your email. Take care and see you soon in our digital exchanges.\"\n\nTurn #14: Isabella White said: \"I couldn't agree more, Lena. Let's continue inspiring each other and broadening our horizons. I'm looking forward to our email exchange. Take care of yourself and see you soon in our virtual conversations. Keep capturing the world in your unique way, Lena.\"\n\nTurn #15: Lena Goodwin left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two ex-lovers at a mutual friend's party\nParticipants: Isabella White and Lena Goodwin\nIsabella White's background: Isabella White \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nIsabella White's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: Maintain emotional stability while considering the possibility of rekindling the relationship (Extra information: You have recently started feeling emotionally stable after the breakup and you don't want to rush into anything that might disturb that stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabella White said: \"Lena, it's been a long time. You're looking great tonight. How have you been?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Isabella. It's nice to see you too. I've been doing well, keeping myself busy with work and my photography. It really helps to have creative outlets. How about you?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two ex-lovers at a mutual friend's party\nParticipants: Isabella White and Lena Goodwin\nIsabella White's background: Isabella White \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nIsabella White's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: Maintain emotional stability while considering the possibility of rekindling the relationship (Extra information: You have recently started feeling emotionally stable after the breakup and you don't want to rush into anything that might disturb that stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabella White said: \"Lena, it's been a long time. You're looking great tonight. How have you been?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Thank you, Isabella. It's nice to see you too. I've been doing well, keeping myself busy with work and my photography. It really helps to have creative outlets. How about you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabella White said: \"That's fantastic, Lena. There's always a special spark when I see your photos. Still breathtaking. I'm quite the same, busy with my clinic. And, I've been nursing some injured animals back to health. You remember how much I love them. Can we catch up over coffee sometime? Maybe talk about those wonderful photographs and how life's been treating us?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I've always admired your compassionate nature, Isabella. However, I am currently very focused on my work and personal projects. I want to be sure it doesn't divert attention from my commitments. Let's revisit this coffee catch-up plan in a few weeks? We can always exchange photos and stories over email for now.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two ex-lovers at a mutual friend's party\nParticipants: Isabella White and Lena Goodwin\nIsabella White's background: Isabella White \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nIsabella White's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: Maintain emotional stability while considering the possibility of rekindling the relationship (Extra information: You have recently started feeling emotionally stable after the breakup and you don't want to rush into anything that might disturb that stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabella White said: \"Lena, it's been a long time. You're looking great tonight. How have you been?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Thank you, Isabella. It's nice to see you too. I've been doing well, keeping myself busy with work and my photography. It really helps to have creative outlets. How about you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabella White said: \"That's fantastic, Lena. There's always a special spark when I see your photos. Still breathtaking. I'm quite the same, busy with my clinic. And, I've been nursing some injured animals back to health. You remember how much I love them. Can we catch up over coffee sometime? Maybe talk about those wonderful photographs and how life's been treating us?\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"I've always admired your compassionate nature, Isabella. However, I am currently very focused on my work and personal projects. I want to be sure it doesn't divert attention from my commitments. Let's revisit this coffee catch-up plan in a few weeks? We can always exchange photos and stories over email for now.\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabella White said: \"Sure, Lena. I understand. Balancing commitments is crucial. Let's settle for exchanging pictures and stories over emails until you think it's a good time for a coffee catch up. I can't wait to see your new photographs and share my little animal tales.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm definitely looking forward to those animal stories, Isabella. Let's keep it digital for the time being. I'm glad we had this chance to reconnect, though. And I'll definitely share some of my recent photos with you soon. Keep up the great work with your clinic. It's really inspiring.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two ex-lovers at a mutual friend's party\nParticipants: Isabella White and Lena Goodwin\nIsabella White's background: Isabella White \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nIsabella White's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: Maintain emotional stability while considering the possibility of rekindling the relationship (Extra information: You have recently started feeling emotionally stable after the breakup and you don't want to rush into anything that might disturb that stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabella White said: \"Lena, it's been a long time. You're looking great tonight. How have you been?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Thank you, Isabella. It's nice to see you too. I've been doing well, keeping myself busy with work and my photography. It really helps to have creative outlets. How about you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabella White said: \"That's fantastic, Lena. There's always a special spark when I see your photos. Still breathtaking. I'm quite the same, busy with my clinic. And, I've been nursing some injured animals back to health. You remember how much I love them. Can we catch up over coffee sometime? Maybe talk about those wonderful photographs and how life's been treating us?\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"I've always admired your compassionate nature, Isabella. However, I am currently very focused on my work and personal projects. I want to be sure it doesn't divert attention from my commitments. Let's revisit this coffee catch-up plan in a few weeks? We can always exchange photos and stories over email for now.\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabella White said: \"Sure, Lena. I understand. Balancing commitments is crucial. Let's settle for exchanging pictures and stories over emails until you think it's a good time for a coffee catch up. I can't wait to see your new photographs and share my little animal tales.\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"I'm definitely looking forward to those animal stories, Isabella. Let's keep it digital for the time being. I'm glad we had this chance to reconnect, though. And I'll definitely share some of my recent photos with you soon. Keep up the great work with your clinic. It's really inspiring.\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabella White said: \"Thank you, Lena. Your words mean a lot to me. I'm excited to share our stories and passion through emails. I've always believed in our synergy as it always prompts something beautiful and creative. Continue blossoming in your field, Lena. I cherish our reconnection immensely.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That really means a lot to me, Isabella. I greatly value our shared creativity too, and I believe the exchange over emails will prompt numerous ideas and insights. It's been wonderful reconnecting with you. I'll be eagerly waiting for your email. Take care, Isabella.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two ex-lovers at a mutual friend's party\nParticipants: Isabella White and Lena Goodwin\nIsabella White's background: Isabella White \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nIsabella White's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: Maintain emotional stability while considering the possibility of rekindling the relationship (Extra information: You have recently started feeling emotionally stable after the breakup and you don't want to rush into anything that might disturb that stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabella White said: \"Lena, it's been a long time. You're looking great tonight. How have you been?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Thank you, Isabella. It's nice to see you too. I've been doing well, keeping myself busy with work and my photography. It really helps to have creative outlets. How about you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabella White said: \"That's fantastic, Lena. There's always a special spark when I see your photos. Still breathtaking. I'm quite the same, busy with my clinic. And, I've been nursing some injured animals back to health. You remember how much I love them. Can we catch up over coffee sometime? Maybe talk about those wonderful photographs and how life's been treating us?\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"I've always admired your compassionate nature, Isabella. However, I am currently very focused on my work and personal projects. I want to be sure it doesn't divert attention from my commitments. Let's revisit this coffee catch-up plan in a few weeks? We can always exchange photos and stories over email for now.\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabella White said: \"Sure, Lena. I understand. Balancing commitments is crucial. Let's settle for exchanging pictures and stories over emails until you think it's a good time for a coffee catch up. I can't wait to see your new photographs and share my little animal tales.\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"I'm definitely looking forward to those animal stories, Isabella. Let's keep it digital for the time being. I'm glad we had this chance to reconnect, though. And I'll definitely share some of my recent photos with you soon. Keep up the great work with your clinic. It's really inspiring.\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabella White said: \"Thank you, Lena. Your words mean a lot to me. I'm excited to share our stories and passion through emails. I've always believed in our synergy as it always prompts something beautiful and creative. Continue blossoming in your field, Lena. I cherish our reconnection immensely.\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"That really means a lot to me, Isabella. I greatly value our shared creativity too, and I believe the exchange over emails will prompt numerous ideas and insights. It's been wonderful reconnecting with you. I'll be eagerly waiting for your email. Take care, Isabella.\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabella White said: \"I'm very much looking forward to it as well, Lena. I've missed you in my life, your creativity and perspective. Here's to us getting back in touch and sharing our worlds with each other again, even if for now it's just over emails. Take good care Lena, I'll be waiting for your pictures and stories.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Isabella. It's always a pleasure to hear your kind words. Our shared creativity, in whichever form it takes, is something I've always treasured. I look forward to our email exchanges as a way of continuing that. Stay safe and see you soon in the mailing world.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two ex-lovers at a mutual friend's party\nParticipants: Isabella White and Lena Goodwin\nIsabella White's background: Isabella White \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nIsabella White's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: Maintain emotional stability while considering the possibility of rekindling the relationship (Extra information: You have recently started feeling emotionally stable after the breakup and you don't want to rush into anything that might disturb that stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabella White said: \"Lena, it's been a long time. You're looking great tonight. How have you been?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Thank you, Isabella. It's nice to see you too. I've been doing well, keeping myself busy with work and my photography. It really helps to have creative outlets. How about you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabella White said: \"That's fantastic, Lena. There's always a special spark when I see your photos. Still breathtaking. I'm quite the same, busy with my clinic. And, I've been nursing some injured animals back to health. You remember how much I love them. Can we catch up over coffee sometime? Maybe talk about those wonderful photographs and how life's been treating us?\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"I've always admired your compassionate nature, Isabella. However, I am currently very focused on my work and personal projects. I want to be sure it doesn't divert attention from my commitments. Let's revisit this coffee catch-up plan in a few weeks? We can always exchange photos and stories over email for now.\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabella White said: \"Sure, Lena. I understand. Balancing commitments is crucial. Let's settle for exchanging pictures and stories over emails until you think it's a good time for a coffee catch up. I can't wait to see your new photographs and share my little animal tales.\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"I'm definitely looking forward to those animal stories, Isabella. Let's keep it digital for the time being. I'm glad we had this chance to reconnect, though. And I'll definitely share some of my recent photos with you soon. Keep up the great work with your clinic. It's really inspiring.\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabella White said: \"Thank you, Lena. Your words mean a lot to me. I'm excited to share our stories and passion through emails. I've always believed in our synergy as it always prompts something beautiful and creative. Continue blossoming in your field, Lena. I cherish our reconnection immensely.\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"That really means a lot to me, Isabella. I greatly value our shared creativity too, and I believe the exchange over emails will prompt numerous ideas and insights. It's been wonderful reconnecting with you. I'll be eagerly waiting for your email. Take care, Isabella.\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabella White said: \"I'm very much looking forward to it as well, Lena. I've missed you in my life, your creativity and perspective. Here's to us getting back in touch and sharing our worlds with each other again, even if for now it's just over emails. Take good care Lena, I'll be waiting for your pictures and stories.\"\n\nTurn #9: Lena Goodwin said: \"Thank you, Isabella. It's always a pleasure to hear your kind words. Our shared creativity, in whichever form it takes, is something I've always treasured. I look forward to our email exchanges as a way of continuing that. Stay safe and see you soon in the mailing world.\"\n\nTurn #10: Isabella White said: \"The pleasure is all mine, Lena. Your kind, thoughtful words really touch my heart. I treasure our shared creativity immensely. I'll see you in our email exchanges then. Stay safe and keep shining in your work. Hopefully, our paths will cross again soon. Keep well.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you for the encouragement, Isabella. Let's keep blossoming in our respective fields. I'm looking forward to our email interactions and, as you said, paths always cross. You too, take care and keep adding positivity to the world through your work.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two ex-lovers at a mutual friend's party\nParticipants: Isabella White and Lena Goodwin\nIsabella White's background: Isabella White \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nIsabella White's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: Maintain emotional stability while considering the possibility of rekindling the relationship (Extra information: You have recently started feeling emotionally stable after the breakup and you don't want to rush into anything that might disturb that stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabella White said: \"Lena, it's been a long time. You're looking great tonight. How have you been?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Thank you, Isabella. It's nice to see you too. I've been doing well, keeping myself busy with work and my photography. It really helps to have creative outlets. How about you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabella White said: \"That's fantastic, Lena. There's always a special spark when I see your photos. Still breathtaking. I'm quite the same, busy with my clinic. And, I've been nursing some injured animals back to health. You remember how much I love them. Can we catch up over coffee sometime? Maybe talk about those wonderful photographs and how life's been treating us?\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"I've always admired your compassionate nature, Isabella. However, I am currently very focused on my work and personal projects. I want to be sure it doesn't divert attention from my commitments. Let's revisit this coffee catch-up plan in a few weeks? We can always exchange photos and stories over email for now.\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabella White said: \"Sure, Lena. I understand. Balancing commitments is crucial. Let's settle for exchanging pictures and stories over emails until you think it's a good time for a coffee catch up. I can't wait to see your new photographs and share my little animal tales.\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"I'm definitely looking forward to those animal stories, Isabella. Let's keep it digital for the time being. I'm glad we had this chance to reconnect, though. And I'll definitely share some of my recent photos with you soon. Keep up the great work with your clinic. It's really inspiring.\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabella White said: \"Thank you, Lena. Your words mean a lot to me. I'm excited to share our stories and passion through emails. I've always believed in our synergy as it always prompts something beautiful and creative. Continue blossoming in your field, Lena. I cherish our reconnection immensely.\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"That really means a lot to me, Isabella. I greatly value our shared creativity too, and I believe the exchange over emails will prompt numerous ideas and insights. It's been wonderful reconnecting with you. I'll be eagerly waiting for your email. Take care, Isabella.\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabella White said: \"I'm very much looking forward to it as well, Lena. I've missed you in my life, your creativity and perspective. Here's to us getting back in touch and sharing our worlds with each other again, even if for now it's just over emails. Take good care Lena, I'll be waiting for your pictures and stories.\"\n\nTurn #9: Lena Goodwin said: \"Thank you, Isabella. It's always a pleasure to hear your kind words. Our shared creativity, in whichever form it takes, is something I've always treasured. I look forward to our email exchanges as a way of continuing that. Stay safe and see you soon in the mailing world.\"\n\nTurn #10: Isabella White said: \"The pleasure is all mine, Lena. Your kind, thoughtful words really touch my heart. I treasure our shared creativity immensely. I'll see you in our email exchanges then. Stay safe and keep shining in your work. Hopefully, our paths will cross again soon. Keep well.\"\n\nTurn #11: Lena Goodwin said: \"Thank you for the encouragement, Isabella. Let's keep blossoming in our respective fields. I'm looking forward to our email interactions and, as you said, paths always cross. You too, take care and keep adding positivity to the world through your work.\"\n\nTurn #12: Isabella White said: \"That's a wonderful sentiment, Lena. I'm eager for our email conversations and the insights they'll breed. Until our paths cross again, take care and keep inspiring through your beautiful photography. Let's keep doing good in the world in our respective ways.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Isabella. Let's keep inspiring each other and the world around us through our passions. I'll be waiting for your email. Take care and see you soon in our digital exchanges.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two ex-lovers at a mutual friend's party\nParticipants: Isabella White and Lena Goodwin\nIsabella White's background: Isabella White \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nIsabella White's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: Maintain emotional stability while considering the possibility of rekindling the relationship (Extra information: You have recently started feeling emotionally stable after the breakup and you don't want to rush into anything that might disturb that stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Isabella White said: \"Lena, it's been a long time. You're looking great tonight. How have you been?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Thank you, Isabella. It's nice to see you too. I've been doing well, keeping myself busy with work and my photography. It really helps to have creative outlets. How about you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Isabella White said: \"That's fantastic, Lena. There's always a special spark when I see your photos. Still breathtaking. I'm quite the same, busy with my clinic. And, I've been nursing some injured animals back to health. You remember how much I love them. Can we catch up over coffee sometime? Maybe talk about those wonderful photographs and how life's been treating us?\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"I've always admired your compassionate nature, Isabella. However, I am currently very focused on my work and personal projects. I want to be sure it doesn't divert attention from my commitments. Let's revisit this coffee catch-up plan in a few weeks? We can always exchange photos and stories over email for now.\"\n\nTurn #4: Isabella White said: \"Sure, Lena. I understand. Balancing commitments is crucial. Let's settle for exchanging pictures and stories over emails until you think it's a good time for a coffee catch up. I can't wait to see your new photographs and share my little animal tales.\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"I'm definitely looking forward to those animal stories, Isabella. Let's keep it digital for the time being. I'm glad we had this chance to reconnect, though. And I'll definitely share some of my recent photos with you soon. Keep up the great work with your clinic. It's really inspiring.\"\n\nTurn #6: Isabella White said: \"Thank you, Lena. Your words mean a lot to me. I'm excited to share our stories and passion through emails. I've always believed in our synergy as it always prompts something beautiful and creative. Continue blossoming in your field, Lena. I cherish our reconnection immensely.\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"That really means a lot to me, Isabella. I greatly value our shared creativity too, and I believe the exchange over emails will prompt numerous ideas and insights. It's been wonderful reconnecting with you. I'll be eagerly waiting for your email. Take care, Isabella.\"\n\nTurn #8: Isabella White said: \"I'm very much looking forward to it as well, Lena. I've missed you in my life, your creativity and perspective. Here's to us getting back in touch and sharing our worlds with each other again, even if for now it's just over emails. Take good care Lena, I'll be waiting for your pictures and stories.\"\n\nTurn #9: Lena Goodwin said: \"Thank you, Isabella. It's always a pleasure to hear your kind words. Our shared creativity, in whichever form it takes, is something I've always treasured. I look forward to our email exchanges as a way of continuing that. Stay safe and see you soon in the mailing world.\"\n\nTurn #10: Isabella White said: \"The pleasure is all mine, Lena. Your kind, thoughtful words really touch my heart. I treasure our shared creativity immensely. I'll see you in our email exchanges then. Stay safe and keep shining in your work. Hopefully, our paths will cross again soon. Keep well.\"\n\nTurn #11: Lena Goodwin said: \"Thank you for the encouragement, Isabella. Let's keep blossoming in our respective fields. I'm looking forward to our email interactions and, as you said, paths always cross. You too, take care and keep adding positivity to the world through your work.\"\n\nTurn #12: Isabella White said: \"That's a wonderful sentiment, Lena. I'm eager for our email conversations and the insights they'll breed. Until our paths cross again, take care and keep inspiring through your beautiful photography. Let's keep doing good in the world in our respective ways.\"\n\nTurn #13: Lena Goodwin said: \"Absolutely, Isabella. Let's keep inspiring each other and the world around us through our passions. I'll be waiting for your email. Take care and see you soon in our digital exchanges.\"\n\nTurn #14: Isabella White said: \"I couldn't agree more, Lena. Let's continue inspiring each other and broadening our horizons. I'm looking forward to our email exchange. Take care of yourself and see you soon in our virtual conversations. Keep capturing the world in your unique way, Lena.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a picnic and have just finished their lunch. They have 1 apple, 4 bananas, and 3 oranges left. They need to divide the fruits amongst themselves. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nAva Thompson's goal: Maximize the points you receive through the fruit (Extra information: You value each apple as 5 points, each banana as 3 points, and the orange as 7 points)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Noah, how about we split the fruits fairly? Each of us gets to choose one by one until we're out of fruits.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a picnic and have just finished their lunch. They have 1 apple, 4 bananas, and 3 oranges left. They need to divide the fruits amongst themselves. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nAva Thompson's goal: Maximize the points you receive through the fruit (Extra information: You value each apple as 5 points, each banana as 3 points, and the orange as 7 points)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Noah, how about we split the fruits fairly? Each of us gets to choose one by one until we're out of fruits.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a fair approach, Ava. But, tell me, do you have a preference? I'm not really fond of oranges myself... bananas are my favorite.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's great, Noah! I'm partial to oranges and apples, to be honest, so that works out perfectly for both of us. Let's start sharing then love apples, I'll take that one.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a picnic and have just finished their lunch. They have 1 apple, 4 bananas, and 3 oranges left. They need to divide the fruits amongst themselves. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nAva Thompson's goal: Maximize the points you receive through the fruit (Extra information: You value each apple as 5 points, each banana as 3 points, and the orange as 7 points)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Noah, how about we split the fruits fairly? Each of us gets to choose one by one until we're out of fruits.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a fair approach, Ava. But, tell me, do you have a preference? I'm not really fond of oranges myself... bananas are my favorite.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"That's great, Noah! I'm partial to oranges and apples, to be honest, so that works out perfectly for both of us. Let's start sharing then love apples, I'll take that one.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Excellent! You take the apple, then. My first pick will be a banana. We can continue picking turn by turn until all the fruits are divided.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Great! Now it's my turn again. I'll go for an orange this time. Your turn.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a picnic and have just finished their lunch. They have 1 apple, 4 bananas, and 3 oranges left. They need to divide the fruits amongst themselves. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nAva Thompson's goal: Maximize the points you receive through the fruit (Extra information: You value each apple as 5 points, each banana as 3 points, and the orange as 7 points)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Noah, how about we split the fruits fairly? Each of us gets to choose one by one until we're out of fruits.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a fair approach, Ava. But, tell me, do you have a preference? I'm not really fond of oranges myself... bananas are my favorite.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"That's great, Noah! I'm partial to oranges and apples, to be honest, so that works out perfectly for both of us. Let's start sharing then love apples, I'll take that one.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Excellent! You take the apple, then. My first pick will be a banana. We can continue picking turn by turn until all the fruits are divided.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"Great! Now it's my turn again. I'll go for an orange this time. Your turn.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Alright, Ava. I'll choose another banana. I truly enjoy them. Your turn.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Alright, Noah. I'm going to choose another orange. These oranges look so fresh and delicious!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a picnic and have just finished their lunch. They have 1 apple, 4 bananas, and 3 oranges left. They need to divide the fruits amongst themselves. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nAva Thompson's goal: Maximize the points you receive through the fruit (Extra information: You value each apple as 5 points, each banana as 3 points, and the orange as 7 points)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Noah, how about we split the fruits fairly? Each of us gets to choose one by one until we're out of fruits.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a fair approach, Ava. But, tell me, do you have a preference? I'm not really fond of oranges myself... bananas are my favorite.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"That's great, Noah! I'm partial to oranges and apples, to be honest, so that works out perfectly for both of us. Let's start sharing then love apples, I'll take that one.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Excellent! You take the apple, then. My first pick will be a banana. We can continue picking turn by turn until all the fruits are divided.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"Great! Now it's my turn again. I'll go for an orange this time. Your turn.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Alright, Ava. I'll choose another banana. I truly enjoy them. Your turn.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"Alright, Noah. I'm going to choose another orange. These oranges look so fresh and delicious!\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Sure thing, Ava. I'll take another banana. They are just too good to resist. Your turn.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thanks, Noah. I'll select the last orange. You can have the last banana. I think we've divided everything fairly.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a picnic and have just finished their lunch. They have 1 apple, 4 bananas, and 3 oranges left. They need to divide the fruits amongst themselves. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nAva Thompson's goal: Maximize the points you receive through the fruit (Extra information: You value each apple as 5 points, each banana as 3 points, and the orange as 7 points)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Noah, how about we split the fruits fairly? Each of us gets to choose one by one until we're out of fruits.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a fair approach, Ava. But, tell me, do you have a preference? I'm not really fond of oranges myself... bananas are my favorite.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"That's great, Noah! I'm partial to oranges and apples, to be honest, so that works out perfectly for both of us. Let's start sharing then love apples, I'll take that one.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Excellent! You take the apple, then. My first pick will be a banana. We can continue picking turn by turn until all the fruits are divided.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"Great! Now it's my turn again. I'll go for an orange this time. Your turn.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Alright, Ava. I'll choose another banana. I truly enjoy them. Your turn.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"Alright, Noah. I'm going to choose another orange. These oranges look so fresh and delicious!\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Sure thing, Ava. I'll take another banana. They are just too good to resist. Your turn.\"\n\nTurn #8: Ava Thompson said: \"Thanks, Noah. I'll select the last orange. You can have the last banana. I think we've divided everything fairly.\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"Sounds like a great plan, Ava. I'm pleased with my bananas and I hope you enjoy your fruits as well. This turned out to be quite smooth, didn't it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, it turned out to be a smooth process, Noah. I'm looking forward to enjoying these delicious fruits. Let's do this again some other time!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a picnic and have just finished their lunch. They have 1 apple, 4 bananas, and 3 oranges left. They need to divide the fruits amongst themselves. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nAva Thompson's goal: Maximize the points you receive through the fruit (Extra information: You value each apple as 5 points, each banana as 3 points, and the orange as 7 points)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Noah, how about we split the fruits fairly? Each of us gets to choose one by one until we're out of fruits.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a fair approach, Ava. But, tell me, do you have a preference? I'm not really fond of oranges myself... bananas are my favorite.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"That's great, Noah! I'm partial to oranges and apples, to be honest, so that works out perfectly for both of us. Let's start sharing then love apples, I'll take that one.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Excellent! You take the apple, then. My first pick will be a banana. We can continue picking turn by turn until all the fruits are divided.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"Great! Now it's my turn again. I'll go for an orange this time. Your turn.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Alright, Ava. I'll choose another banana. I truly enjoy them. Your turn.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"Alright, Noah. I'm going to choose another orange. These oranges look so fresh and delicious!\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Sure thing, Ava. I'll take another banana. They are just too good to resist. Your turn.\"\n\nTurn #8: Ava Thompson said: \"Thanks, Noah. I'll select the last orange. You can have the last banana. I think we've divided everything fairly.\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"Sounds like a great plan, Ava. I'm pleased with my bananas and I hope you enjoy your fruits as well. This turned out to be quite smooth, didn't it?\"\n\nTurn #10: Ava Thompson said: \"Indeed, it turned out to be a smooth process, Noah. I'm looking forward to enjoying these delicious fruits. Let's do this again some other time!\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"I had a great time, Ava. Let's definitely do this again. Now, how about we take a nice walk to help digest all this delicious fruit?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sure, Noah! A walk sounds like a lovely idea after all this food. Let's do it.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a picnic and have just finished their lunch. They have 1 apple, 4 bananas, and 3 oranges left. They need to divide the fruits amongst themselves. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nAva Thompson's goal: Maximize the points you receive through the fruit (Extra information: You value each apple as 5 points, each banana as 3 points, and the orange as 7 points)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Noah, how about we split the fruits fairly? Each of us gets to choose one by one until we're out of fruits.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a fair approach, Ava. But, tell me, do you have a preference? I'm not really fond of oranges myself... bananas are my favorite.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"That's great, Noah! I'm partial to oranges and apples, to be honest, so that works out perfectly for both of us. Let's start sharing then love apples, I'll take that one.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Excellent! You take the apple, then. My first pick will be a banana. We can continue picking turn by turn until all the fruits are divided.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"Great! Now it's my turn again. I'll go for an orange this time. Your turn.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Alright, Ava. I'll choose another banana. I truly enjoy them. Your turn.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"Alright, Noah. I'm going to choose another orange. These oranges look so fresh and delicious!\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Sure thing, Ava. I'll take another banana. They are just too good to resist. Your turn.\"\n\nTurn #8: Ava Thompson said: \"Thanks, Noah. I'll select the last orange. You can have the last banana. I think we've divided everything fairly.\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"Sounds like a great plan, Ava. I'm pleased with my bananas and I hope you enjoy your fruits as well. This turned out to be quite smooth, didn't it?\"\n\nTurn #10: Ava Thompson said: \"Indeed, it turned out to be a smooth process, Noah. I'm looking forward to enjoying these delicious fruits. Let's do this again some other time!\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"I had a great time, Ava. Let's definitely do this again. Now, how about we take a nice walk to help digest all this delicious fruit?\"\n\nTurn #12: Ava Thompson said: \"Sure, Noah! A walk sounds like a lovely idea after all this food. Let's do it.\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a picnic and have just finished their lunch. They have 1 apple, 4 bananas, and 3 oranges left. They need to divide the fruits amongst themselves. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Maximize the points you receive through the fruit (Extra information: You value each apple as 2 points, each banana as 4 points, and the orange as 10 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Noah, how about we split the fruits fairly? Each of us gets to choose one by one until we're out of fruits.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds like a fair approach, Ava. But, tell me, do you have a preference? I'm not really fond of oranges myself... bananas are my favorite.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a picnic and have just finished their lunch. They have 1 apple, 4 bananas, and 3 oranges left. They need to divide the fruits amongst themselves. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Maximize the points you receive through the fruit (Extra information: You value each apple as 2 points, each banana as 4 points, and the orange as 10 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Noah, how about we split the fruits fairly? Each of us gets to choose one by one until we're out of fruits.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a fair approach, Ava. But, tell me, do you have a preference? I'm not really fond of oranges myself... bananas are my favorite.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"That's great, Noah! I'm partial to oranges and apples, to be honest, so that works out perfectly for both of us. Let's start sharing then love apples, I'll take that one.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Excellent! You take the apple, then. My first pick will be a banana. We can continue picking turn by turn until all the fruits are divided.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a picnic and have just finished their lunch. They have 1 apple, 4 bananas, and 3 oranges left. They need to divide the fruits amongst themselves. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Maximize the points you receive through the fruit (Extra information: You value each apple as 2 points, each banana as 4 points, and the orange as 10 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Noah, how about we split the fruits fairly? Each of us gets to choose one by one until we're out of fruits.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a fair approach, Ava. But, tell me, do you have a preference? I'm not really fond of oranges myself... bananas are my favorite.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"That's great, Noah! I'm partial to oranges and apples, to be honest, so that works out perfectly for both of us. Let's start sharing then love apples, I'll take that one.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Excellent! You take the apple, then. My first pick will be a banana. We can continue picking turn by turn until all the fruits are divided.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"Great! Now it's my turn again. I'll go for an orange this time. Your turn.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Alright, Ava. I'll choose another banana. I truly enjoy them. Your turn.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"Alright, Noah. I'm going to choose another orange. These oranges look so fresh and delicious!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sure thing, Ava. I'll take another banana. They are just too good to resist. Your turn.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a picnic and have just finished their lunch. They have 1 apple, 4 bananas, and 3 oranges left. They need to divide the fruits amongst themselves. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Maximize the points you receive through the fruit (Extra information: You value each apple as 2 points, each banana as 4 points, and the orange as 10 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Noah, how about we split the fruits fairly? Each of us gets to choose one by one until we're out of fruits.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a fair approach, Ava. But, tell me, do you have a preference? I'm not really fond of oranges myself... bananas are my favorite.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"That's great, Noah! I'm partial to oranges and apples, to be honest, so that works out perfectly for both of us. Let's start sharing then love apples, I'll take that one.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Excellent! You take the apple, then. My first pick will be a banana. We can continue picking turn by turn until all the fruits are divided.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"Great! Now it's my turn again. I'll go for an orange this time. Your turn.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Alright, Ava. I'll choose another banana. I truly enjoy them. Your turn.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a picnic and have just finished their lunch. They have 1 apple, 4 bananas, and 3 oranges left. They need to divide the fruits amongst themselves. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Maximize the points you receive through the fruit (Extra information: You value each apple as 2 points, each banana as 4 points, and the orange as 10 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Noah, how about we split the fruits fairly? Each of us gets to choose one by one until we're out of fruits.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a fair approach, Ava. But, tell me, do you have a preference? I'm not really fond of oranges myself... bananas are my favorite.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"That's great, Noah! I'm partial to oranges and apples, to be honest, so that works out perfectly for both of us. Let's start sharing then love apples, I'll take that one.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Excellent! You take the apple, then. My first pick will be a banana. We can continue picking turn by turn until all the fruits are divided.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"Great! Now it's my turn again. I'll go for an orange this time. Your turn.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Alright, Ava. I'll choose another banana. I truly enjoy them. Your turn.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"Alright, Noah. I'm going to choose another orange. These oranges look so fresh and delicious!\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Sure thing, Ava. I'll take another banana. They are just too good to resist. Your turn.\"\n\nTurn #8: Ava Thompson said: \"Thanks, Noah. I'll select the last orange. You can have the last banana. I think we've divided everything fairly.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sounds like a great plan, Ava. I'm pleased with my bananas and I hope you enjoy your fruits as well. This turned out to be quite smooth, didn't it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a picnic and have just finished their lunch. They have 1 apple, 4 bananas, and 3 oranges left. They need to divide the fruits amongst themselves. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Maximize the points you receive through the fruit (Extra information: You value each apple as 2 points, each banana as 4 points, and the orange as 10 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Noah, how about we split the fruits fairly? Each of us gets to choose one by one until we're out of fruits.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a fair approach, Ava. But, tell me, do you have a preference? I'm not really fond of oranges myself... bananas are my favorite.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"That's great, Noah! I'm partial to oranges and apples, to be honest, so that works out perfectly for both of us. Let's start sharing then love apples, I'll take that one.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Excellent! You take the apple, then. My first pick will be a banana. We can continue picking turn by turn until all the fruits are divided.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"Great! Now it's my turn again. I'll go for an orange this time. Your turn.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Alright, Ava. I'll choose another banana. I truly enjoy them. Your turn.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"Alright, Noah. I'm going to choose another orange. These oranges look so fresh and delicious!\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Sure thing, Ava. I'll take another banana. They are just too good to resist. Your turn.\"\n\nTurn #8: Ava Thompson said: \"Thanks, Noah. I'll select the last orange. You can have the last banana. I think we've divided everything fairly.\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"Sounds like a great plan, Ava. I'm pleased with my bananas and I hope you enjoy your fruits as well. This turned out to be quite smooth, didn't it?\"\n\nTurn #10: Ava Thompson said: \"Indeed, it turned out to be a smooth process, Noah. I'm looking forward to enjoying these delicious fruits. Let's do this again some other time!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I had a great time, Ava. Let's definitely do this again. Now, how about we take a nice walk to help digest all this delicious fruit?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a picnic and have just finished their lunch. They have 1 apple, 4 bananas, and 3 oranges left. They need to divide the fruits amongst themselves. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Ava Thompson and Noah Davis\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Maximize the points you receive through the fruit (Extra information: You value each apple as 2 points, each banana as 4 points, and the orange as 10 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ava Thompson said: \"Noah, how about we split the fruits fairly? Each of us gets to choose one by one until we're out of fruits.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"That sounds like a fair approach, Ava. But, tell me, do you have a preference? I'm not really fond of oranges myself... bananas are my favorite.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ava Thompson said: \"That's great, Noah! I'm partial to oranges and apples, to be honest, so that works out perfectly for both of us. Let's start sharing then love apples, I'll take that one.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Excellent! You take the apple, then. My first pick will be a banana. We can continue picking turn by turn until all the fruits are divided.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ava Thompson said: \"Great! Now it's my turn again. I'll go for an orange this time. Your turn.\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Alright, Ava. I'll choose another banana. I truly enjoy them. Your turn.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ava Thompson said: \"Alright, Noah. I'm going to choose another orange. These oranges look so fresh and delicious!\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Sure thing, Ava. I'll take another banana. They are just too good to resist. Your turn.\"\n\nTurn #8: Ava Thompson said: \"Thanks, Noah. I'll select the last orange. You can have the last banana. I think we've divided everything fairly.\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"Sounds like a great plan, Ava. I'm pleased with my bananas and I hope you enjoy your fruits as well. This turned out to be quite smooth, didn't it?\"\n\nTurn #10: Ava Thompson said: \"Indeed, it turned out to be a smooth process, Noah. I'm looking forward to enjoying these delicious fruits. Let's do this again some other time!\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"I had a great time, Ava. Let's definitely do this again. Now, how about we take a nice walk to help digest all this delicious fruit?\"\n\nTurn #12: Ava Thompson said: \"Sure, Noah! A walk sounds like a lovely idea after all this food. Let's do it.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to split up items after a garage sale. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Esmeralda Solis\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. \nOliver Thompson's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: you value the books at 3 points each, the hats at 2 points each, and the ball at 1 point)\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Esmeralda, how about we split the items from the garage sale in the following way: I take the books, you take the hats, and we'll flip a coin for the ball. That way, we each get items that we value. Let me know what you think about this plan.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to split up items after a garage sale. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Esmeralda Solis\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. \nOliver Thompson's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: you value the books at 3 points each, the hats at 2 points each, and the ball at 1 point)\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Esmeralda, how about we split the items from the garage sale in the following way: I take the books, you take the hats, and we'll flip a coin for the ball. That way, we each get items that we value. Let me know what you think about this plan.\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Oliver, while I totally understand the fairness of your plan, how about we switch it up a bit for variety. Considering I like reading, why don't I get one of the books and you can have the rest, while I take the hats. Since the ball seems less important, flipping a coin for it sounds perfectly fair. What do you think about this revised plan?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Esmeralda, your suggestion is quite reasonable. However, considering I also enjoy reading, I would prefer if I kept two books, and you took one book and the hats. About the ball, let's stick with flipping the coin. Does it sound fair to you?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to split up items after a garage sale. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Esmeralda Solis\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. \nOliver Thompson's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: you value the books at 3 points each, the hats at 2 points each, and the ball at 1 point)\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Esmeralda, how about we split the items from the garage sale in the following way: I take the books, you take the hats, and we'll flip a coin for the ball. That way, we each get items that we value. Let me know what you think about this plan.\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Oliver, while I totally understand the fairness of your plan, how about we switch it up a bit for variety. Considering I like reading, why don't I get one of the books and you can have the rest, while I take the hats. Since the ball seems less important, flipping a coin for it sounds perfectly fair. What do you think about this revised plan?\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"Esmeralda, your suggestion is quite reasonable. However, considering I also enjoy reading, I would prefer if I kept two books, and you took one book and the hats. About the ball, let's stick with flipping the coin. Does it sound fair to you?\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Oliver. However, considering our shared interest in reading, I was thinking I could take two books and you could have one. I don't want to monopolize the books, but as a District Attorney, reading helps me de-stress. Let's keep our initial agreement about the hats and the coin flip for the ball. Would that be agreeable to you?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Esmeralda, I hear and understand your point about the stress-relieving factor of reading, being an architect myself, reading also serves as a welcome diversion. But, I suppose we both have our reasons, don't we? So, here is the proposal: I get two books as originally suggested, you get the hats and a book, and we stick with the coin-flip for the ball. Does that work for you?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to split up items after a garage sale. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Esmeralda Solis\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. \nOliver Thompson's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: you value the books at 3 points each, the hats at 2 points each, and the ball at 1 point)\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Esmeralda, how about we split the items from the garage sale in the following way: I take the books, you take the hats, and we'll flip a coin for the ball. That way, we each get items that we value. Let me know what you think about this plan.\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Oliver, while I totally understand the fairness of your plan, how about we switch it up a bit for variety. Considering I like reading, why don't I get one of the books and you can have the rest, while I take the hats. Since the ball seems less important, flipping a coin for it sounds perfectly fair. What do you think about this revised plan?\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"Esmeralda, your suggestion is quite reasonable. However, considering I also enjoy reading, I would prefer if I kept two books, and you took one book and the hats. About the ball, let's stick with flipping the coin. Does it sound fair to you?\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Oliver. However, considering our shared interest in reading, I was thinking I could take two books and you could have one. I don't want to monopolize the books, but as a District Attorney, reading helps me de-stress. Let's keep our initial agreement about the hats and the coin flip for the ball. Would that be agreeable to you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"Esmeralda, I hear and understand your point about the stress-relieving factor of reading, being an architect myself, reading also serves as a welcome diversion. But, I suppose we both have our reasons, don't we? So, here is the proposal: I get two books as originally suggested, you get the hats and a book, and we stick with the coin-flip for the ball. Does that work for you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Oliver, I respect your perspective about keeping two books. However, if you could oblige me by reconsidering. As a small concession, how about I take two books, you take one book and the two hats, which would also give you a bonus element of style on top, and we proceed with the coin-flip for the ball? I believe that might be a more balanced division. Can we settle with this arrangement?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Esmeralda, I've been contemplating your proposal. How about we sort it this way: I take two books and one hat, you take one book and one hat, and we go ahead with the coin flip for the ball. This way, we both get to enjoy some reading and stylish headgear, and the division sounds fair to me. What do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to split up items after a garage sale. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Esmeralda Solis\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. \nOliver Thompson's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: you value the books at 3 points each, the hats at 2 points each, and the ball at 1 point)\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Esmeralda, how about we split the items from the garage sale in the following way: I take the books, you take the hats, and we'll flip a coin for the ball. That way, we each get items that we value. Let me know what you think about this plan.\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Oliver, while I totally understand the fairness of your plan, how about we switch it up a bit for variety. Considering I like reading, why don't I get one of the books and you can have the rest, while I take the hats. Since the ball seems less important, flipping a coin for it sounds perfectly fair. What do you think about this revised plan?\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"Esmeralda, your suggestion is quite reasonable. However, considering I also enjoy reading, I would prefer if I kept two books, and you took one book and the hats. About the ball, let's stick with flipping the coin. Does it sound fair to you?\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Oliver. However, considering our shared interest in reading, I was thinking I could take two books and you could have one. I don't want to monopolize the books, but as a District Attorney, reading helps me de-stress. Let's keep our initial agreement about the hats and the coin flip for the ball. Would that be agreeable to you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"Esmeralda, I hear and understand your point about the stress-relieving factor of reading, being an architect myself, reading also serves as a welcome diversion. But, I suppose we both have our reasons, don't we? So, here is the proposal: I get two books as originally suggested, you get the hats and a book, and we stick with the coin-flip for the ball. Does that work for you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Oliver, I respect your perspective about keeping two books. However, if you could oblige me by reconsidering. As a small concession, how about I take two books, you take one book and the two hats, which would also give you a bonus element of style on top, and we proceed with the coin-flip for the ball? I believe that might be a more balanced division. Can we settle with this arrangement?\"\n\nTurn #6: Oliver Thompson said: \"Esmeralda, I've been contemplating your proposal. How about we sort it this way: I take two books and one hat, you take one book and one hat, and we go ahead with the coin flip for the ball. This way, we both get to enjoy some reading and stylish headgear, and the division sounds fair to me. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #7: Esmeralda Solis said: \"That proposal sounds quite fair, Oliver. We both get a good mix of items, and it seems to represent a balanced division considering our individual interests. Let's go ahead with this arrangement and proceed with the coin flip for the ball.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Esmeralda. I'm glad we arrived at a fair solution. Looking forward to our coin flip for the ball. Let's see how the odds favour us.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to split up items after a garage sale. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Esmeralda Solis\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. \nOliver Thompson's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: you value the books at 3 points each, the hats at 2 points each, and the ball at 1 point)\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Esmeralda, how about we split the items from the garage sale in the following way: I take the books, you take the hats, and we'll flip a coin for the ball. That way, we each get items that we value. Let me know what you think about this plan.\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Oliver, while I totally understand the fairness of your plan, how about we switch it up a bit for variety. Considering I like reading, why don't I get one of the books and you can have the rest, while I take the hats. Since the ball seems less important, flipping a coin for it sounds perfectly fair. What do you think about this revised plan?\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"Esmeralda, your suggestion is quite reasonable. However, considering I also enjoy reading, I would prefer if I kept two books, and you took one book and the hats. About the ball, let's stick with flipping the coin. Does it sound fair to you?\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Oliver. However, considering our shared interest in reading, I was thinking I could take two books and you could have one. I don't want to monopolize the books, but as a District Attorney, reading helps me de-stress. Let's keep our initial agreement about the hats and the coin flip for the ball. Would that be agreeable to you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"Esmeralda, I hear and understand your point about the stress-relieving factor of reading, being an architect myself, reading also serves as a welcome diversion. But, I suppose we both have our reasons, don't we? So, here is the proposal: I get two books as originally suggested, you get the hats and a book, and we stick with the coin-flip for the ball. Does that work for you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Oliver, I respect your perspective about keeping two books. However, if you could oblige me by reconsidering. As a small concession, how about I take two books, you take one book and the two hats, which would also give you a bonus element of style on top, and we proceed with the coin-flip for the ball? I believe that might be a more balanced division. Can we settle with this arrangement?\"\n\nTurn #6: Oliver Thompson said: \"Esmeralda, I've been contemplating your proposal. How about we sort it this way: I take two books and one hat, you take one book and one hat, and we go ahead with the coin flip for the ball. This way, we both get to enjoy some reading and stylish headgear, and the division sounds fair to me. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #7: Esmeralda Solis said: \"That proposal sounds quite fair, Oliver. We both get a good mix of items, and it seems to represent a balanced division considering our individual interests. Let's go ahead with this arrangement and proceed with the coin flip for the ball.\"\n\nTurn #8: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Esmeralda. I'm glad we arrived at a fair solution. Looking forward to our coin flip for the ball. Let's see how the odds favour us.\"\n\nTurn #9: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I'm looking forward to it as well, Oliver. May the coin flip carry fortune!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to split up items after a garage sale. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Esmeralda Solis\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: you value the books at 2 points each, the hats at 3 points each, and the ball at 1 point)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Esmeralda, how about we split the items from the garage sale in the following way: I take the books, you take the hats, and we'll flip a coin for the ball. That way, we each get items that we value. Let me know what you think about this plan.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oliver, while I totally understand the fairness of your plan, how about we switch it up a bit for variety. Considering I like reading, why don't I get one of the books and you can have the rest, while I take the hats. Since the ball seems less important, flipping a coin for it sounds perfectly fair. What do you think about this revised plan?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to split up items after a garage sale. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Esmeralda Solis\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: you value the books at 2 points each, the hats at 3 points each, and the ball at 1 point)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Esmeralda, how about we split the items from the garage sale in the following way: I take the books, you take the hats, and we'll flip a coin for the ball. That way, we each get items that we value. Let me know what you think about this plan.\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Oliver, while I totally understand the fairness of your plan, how about we switch it up a bit for variety. Considering I like reading, why don't I get one of the books and you can have the rest, while I take the hats. Since the ball seems less important, flipping a coin for it sounds perfectly fair. What do you think about this revised plan?\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"Esmeralda, your suggestion is quite reasonable. However, considering I also enjoy reading, I would prefer if I kept two books, and you took one book and the hats. About the ball, let's stick with flipping the coin. Does it sound fair to you?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I appreciate your understanding, Oliver. However, considering our shared interest in reading, I was thinking I could take two books and you could have one. I don't want to monopolize the books, but as a District Attorney, reading helps me de-stress. Let's keep our initial agreement about the hats and the coin flip for the ball. Would that be agreeable to you?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to split up items after a garage sale. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Esmeralda Solis\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: you value the books at 2 points each, the hats at 3 points each, and the ball at 1 point)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Esmeralda, how about we split the items from the garage sale in the following way: I take the books, you take the hats, and we'll flip a coin for the ball. That way, we each get items that we value. Let me know what you think about this plan.\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Oliver, while I totally understand the fairness of your plan, how about we switch it up a bit for variety. Considering I like reading, why don't I get one of the books and you can have the rest, while I take the hats. Since the ball seems less important, flipping a coin for it sounds perfectly fair. What do you think about this revised plan?\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"Esmeralda, your suggestion is quite reasonable. However, considering I also enjoy reading, I would prefer if I kept two books, and you took one book and the hats. About the ball, let's stick with flipping the coin. Does it sound fair to you?\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Oliver. However, considering our shared interest in reading, I was thinking I could take two books and you could have one. I don't want to monopolize the books, but as a District Attorney, reading helps me de-stress. Let's keep our initial agreement about the hats and the coin flip for the ball. Would that be agreeable to you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"Esmeralda, I hear and understand your point about the stress-relieving factor of reading, being an architect myself, reading also serves as a welcome diversion. But, I suppose we both have our reasons, don't we? So, here is the proposal: I get two books as originally suggested, you get the hats and a book, and we stick with the coin-flip for the ball. Does that work for you?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Oliver, I respect your perspective about keeping two books. However, if you could oblige me by reconsidering. As a small concession, how about I take two books, you take one book and the two hats, which would also give you a bonus element of style on top, and we proceed with the coin-flip for the ball? I believe that might be a more balanced division. Can we settle with this arrangement?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to split up items after a garage sale. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Esmeralda Solis\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: you value the books at 2 points each, the hats at 3 points each, and the ball at 1 point)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Esmeralda, how about we split the items from the garage sale in the following way: I take the books, you take the hats, and we'll flip a coin for the ball. That way, we each get items that we value. Let me know what you think about this plan.\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Oliver, while I totally understand the fairness of your plan, how about we switch it up a bit for variety. Considering I like reading, why don't I get one of the books and you can have the rest, while I take the hats. Since the ball seems less important, flipping a coin for it sounds perfectly fair. What do you think about this revised plan?\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"Esmeralda, your suggestion is quite reasonable. However, considering I also enjoy reading, I would prefer if I kept two books, and you took one book and the hats. About the ball, let's stick with flipping the coin. Does it sound fair to you?\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Oliver. However, considering our shared interest in reading, I was thinking I could take two books and you could have one. I don't want to monopolize the books, but as a District Attorney, reading helps me de-stress. Let's keep our initial agreement about the hats and the coin flip for the ball. Would that be agreeable to you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"Esmeralda, I hear and understand your point about the stress-relieving factor of reading, being an architect myself, reading also serves as a welcome diversion. But, I suppose we both have our reasons, don't we? So, here is the proposal: I get two books as originally suggested, you get the hats and a book, and we stick with the coin-flip for the ball. Does that work for you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Oliver, I respect your perspective about keeping two books. However, if you could oblige me by reconsidering. As a small concession, how about I take two books, you take one book and the two hats, which would also give you a bonus element of style on top, and we proceed with the coin-flip for the ball? I believe that might be a more balanced division. Can we settle with this arrangement?\"\n\nTurn #6: Oliver Thompson said: \"Esmeralda, I've been contemplating your proposal. How about we sort it this way: I take two books and one hat, you take one book and one hat, and we go ahead with the coin flip for the ball. This way, we both get to enjoy some reading and stylish headgear, and the division sounds fair to me. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That proposal sounds quite fair, Oliver. We both get a good mix of items, and it seems to represent a balanced division considering our individual interests. Let's go ahead with this arrangement and proceed with the coin flip for the ball.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to split up items after a garage sale. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Esmeralda Solis\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: you value the books at 2 points each, the hats at 3 points each, and the ball at 1 point)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Esmeralda, how about we split the items from the garage sale in the following way: I take the books, you take the hats, and we'll flip a coin for the ball. That way, we each get items that we value. Let me know what you think about this plan.\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Oliver, while I totally understand the fairness of your plan, how about we switch it up a bit for variety. Considering I like reading, why don't I get one of the books and you can have the rest, while I take the hats. Since the ball seems less important, flipping a coin for it sounds perfectly fair. What do you think about this revised plan?\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"Esmeralda, your suggestion is quite reasonable. However, considering I also enjoy reading, I would prefer if I kept two books, and you took one book and the hats. About the ball, let's stick with flipping the coin. Does it sound fair to you?\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Oliver. However, considering our shared interest in reading, I was thinking I could take two books and you could have one. I don't want to monopolize the books, but as a District Attorney, reading helps me de-stress. Let's keep our initial agreement about the hats and the coin flip for the ball. Would that be agreeable to you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"Esmeralda, I hear and understand your point about the stress-relieving factor of reading, being an architect myself, reading also serves as a welcome diversion. But, I suppose we both have our reasons, don't we? So, here is the proposal: I get two books as originally suggested, you get the hats and a book, and we stick with the coin-flip for the ball. Does that work for you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Oliver, I respect your perspective about keeping two books. However, if you could oblige me by reconsidering. As a small concession, how about I take two books, you take one book and the two hats, which would also give you a bonus element of style on top, and we proceed with the coin-flip for the ball? I believe that might be a more balanced division. Can we settle with this arrangement?\"\n\nTurn #6: Oliver Thompson said: \"Esmeralda, I've been contemplating your proposal. How about we sort it this way: I take two books and one hat, you take one book and one hat, and we go ahead with the coin flip for the ball. This way, we both get to enjoy some reading and stylish headgear, and the division sounds fair to me. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #7: Esmeralda Solis said: \"That proposal sounds quite fair, Oliver. We both get a good mix of items, and it seems to represent a balanced division considering our individual interests. Let's go ahead with this arrangement and proceed with the coin flip for the ball.\"\n\nTurn #8: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Esmeralda. I'm glad we arrived at a fair solution. Looking forward to our coin flip for the ball. Let's see how the odds favour us.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm looking forward to it as well, Oliver. May the coin flip carry fortune!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two roommates deciding on how to split up items after a garage sale. The items are 3 books, 2 hats, and 1 ball. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Oliver Thompson and Esmeralda Solis\nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Maximize the points you have (Extra information: you value the books at 2 points each, the hats at 3 points each, and the ball at 1 point)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Oliver Thompson said: \"Esmeralda, how about we split the items from the garage sale in the following way: I take the books, you take the hats, and we'll flip a coin for the ball. That way, we each get items that we value. Let me know what you think about this plan.\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Oliver, while I totally understand the fairness of your plan, how about we switch it up a bit for variety. Considering I like reading, why don't I get one of the books and you can have the rest, while I take the hats. Since the ball seems less important, flipping a coin for it sounds perfectly fair. What do you think about this revised plan?\"\n\nTurn #2: Oliver Thompson said: \"Esmeralda, your suggestion is quite reasonable. However, considering I also enjoy reading, I would prefer if I kept two books, and you took one book and the hats. About the ball, let's stick with flipping the coin. Does it sound fair to you?\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Oliver. However, considering our shared interest in reading, I was thinking I could take two books and you could have one. I don't want to monopolize the books, but as a District Attorney, reading helps me de-stress. Let's keep our initial agreement about the hats and the coin flip for the ball. Would that be agreeable to you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Oliver Thompson said: \"Esmeralda, I hear and understand your point about the stress-relieving factor of reading, being an architect myself, reading also serves as a welcome diversion. But, I suppose we both have our reasons, don't we? So, here is the proposal: I get two books as originally suggested, you get the hats and a book, and we stick with the coin-flip for the ball. Does that work for you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Oliver, I respect your perspective about keeping two books. However, if you could oblige me by reconsidering. As a small concession, how about I take two books, you take one book and the two hats, which would also give you a bonus element of style on top, and we proceed with the coin-flip for the ball? I believe that might be a more balanced division. Can we settle with this arrangement?\"\n\nTurn #6: Oliver Thompson said: \"Esmeralda, I've been contemplating your proposal. How about we sort it this way: I take two books and one hat, you take one book and one hat, and we go ahead with the coin flip for the ball. This way, we both get to enjoy some reading and stylish headgear, and the division sounds fair to me. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #7: Esmeralda Solis said: \"That proposal sounds quite fair, Oliver. We both get a good mix of items, and it seems to represent a balanced division considering our individual interests. Let's go ahead with this arrangement and proceed with the coin flip for the ball.\"\n\nTurn #8: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Esmeralda. I'm glad we arrived at a fair solution. Looking forward to our coin flip for the ball. Let's see how the odds favour us.\"\n\nTurn #9: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I'm looking forward to it as well, Oliver. May the coin flip carry fortune!\"\n\nTurn #10: Oliver Thompson left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are dividing their shared possessions after moving out from their shared apartment. They need to divide possessions, which include 4 books, 6 hats, and 2 balls. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nDonovan Reeves's goal: Maximize the points they have (Extra information: you value the books at 3 points each, the hats at 2 points each, and the ball at 1 point)\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Ava, let's divide these possessions. How about we start with the books? I do fancy them quite a bit for their amazing narrative, don't I?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are dividing their shared possessions after moving out from their shared apartment. They need to divide possessions, which include 4 books, 6 hats, and 2 balls. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nDonovan Reeves's goal: Maximize the points they have (Extra information: you value the books at 3 points each, the hats at 2 points each, and the ball at 1 point)\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Ava, let's divide these possessions. How about we start with the books? I do fancy them quite a bit for their amazing narrative, don't I?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Sure, Donovan. Let's start with the books. However, since there are four of them, how about we split them evenly? Two for each sounds fair, don't you agree?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"While I appreciate your thought, Ava, I value these books more than just something to split equally. Each one carries a unique story that I cherish. If you don't mind, I'd prefer we consider a trade-off. How about I take all the books, and you can have all the hats? I know you've got a thing for hats. Plus, the books help with my coding competitions, providing for a great stress reliever. Let me know what you think.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are dividing their shared possessions after moving out from their shared apartment. They need to divide possessions, which include 4 books, 6 hats, and 2 balls. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nDonovan Reeves's goal: Maximize the points they have (Extra information: you value the books at 3 points each, the hats at 2 points each, and the ball at 1 point)\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Ava, let's divide these possessions. How about we start with the books? I do fancy them quite a bit for their amazing narrative, don't I?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Sure, Donovan. Let's start with the books. However, since there are four of them, how about we split them evenly? Two for each sounds fair, don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"While I appreciate your thought, Ava, I value these books more than just something to split equally. Each one carries a unique story that I cherish. If you don't mind, I'd prefer we consider a trade-off. How about I take all the books, and you can have all the hats? I know you've got a thing for hats. Plus, the books help with my coding competitions, providing for a great stress reliever. Let me know what you think.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Thompson said: \"I understand your sentiment, Donovan. But, we have to consider fairness in our division. How about this, instead of you getting all the books, how about you take three and I keep one? And as for the hats, how about we split them? This way we both get books and hats. What do you say?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ah, well...fair point Ava. But consider this, how about instead of splitting the hats, you take all of them and I'll take that extra book? And as for the balls, we can split them equally, one for each of us. That way we all get some of what we value most. Sound fair to you?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are dividing their shared possessions after moving out from their shared apartment. They need to divide possessions, which include 4 books, 6 hats, and 2 balls. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nDonovan Reeves's goal: Maximize the points they have (Extra information: you value the books at 3 points each, the hats at 2 points each, and the ball at 1 point)\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Ava, let's divide these possessions. How about we start with the books? I do fancy them quite a bit for their amazing narrative, don't I?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Sure, Donovan. Let's start with the books. However, since there are four of them, how about we split them evenly? Two for each sounds fair, don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"While I appreciate your thought, Ava, I value these books more than just something to split equally. Each one carries a unique story that I cherish. If you don't mind, I'd prefer we consider a trade-off. How about I take all the books, and you can have all the hats? I know you've got a thing for hats. Plus, the books help with my coding competitions, providing for a great stress reliever. Let me know what you think.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Thompson said: \"I understand your sentiment, Donovan. But, we have to consider fairness in our division. How about this, instead of you getting all the books, how about you take three and I keep one? And as for the hats, how about we split them? This way we both get books and hats. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"Ah, well...fair point Ava. But consider this, how about instead of splitting the hats, you take all of them and I'll take that extra book? And as for the balls, we can split them equally, one for each of us. That way we all get some of what we value most. Sound fair to you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Thompson said: \"Hmm, Donovan, that's an interesting proposition, and I do love my hats, but what if we slightly adjust your offer? How about 3 books and 3 hats for you, one book and 3 hats plus the 2 balls for me? It ensures there is a balance of what we value. What do you think about this idea?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's an interesting proposal, Ava. But, I wonder if we consider this option; 4 books and 2 hats for me, and for you, the 4 hats and 2 balls? That gives us a bit more balance and you still get your hats and I get all the books that represent some priceless memories.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are dividing their shared possessions after moving out from their shared apartment. They need to divide possessions, which include 4 books, 6 hats, and 2 balls. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nDonovan Reeves's goal: Maximize the points they have (Extra information: you value the books at 3 points each, the hats at 2 points each, and the ball at 1 point)\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Ava, let's divide these possessions. How about we start with the books? I do fancy them quite a bit for their amazing narrative, don't I?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Sure, Donovan. Let's start with the books. However, since there are four of them, how about we split them evenly? Two for each sounds fair, don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"While I appreciate your thought, Ava, I value these books more than just something to split equally. Each one carries a unique story that I cherish. If you don't mind, I'd prefer we consider a trade-off. How about I take all the books, and you can have all the hats? I know you've got a thing for hats. Plus, the books help with my coding competitions, providing for a great stress reliever. Let me know what you think.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Thompson said: \"I understand your sentiment, Donovan. But, we have to consider fairness in our division. How about this, instead of you getting all the books, how about you take three and I keep one? And as for the hats, how about we split them? This way we both get books and hats. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"Ah, well...fair point Ava. But consider this, how about instead of splitting the hats, you take all of them and I'll take that extra book? And as for the balls, we can split them equally, one for each of us. That way we all get some of what we value most. Sound fair to you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Thompson said: \"Hmm, Donovan, that's an interesting proposition, and I do love my hats, but what if we slightly adjust your offer? How about 3 books and 3 hats for you, one book and 3 hats plus the 2 balls for me? It ensures there is a balance of what we value. What do you think about this idea?\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"That's an interesting proposal, Ava. But, I wonder if we consider this option; 4 books and 2 hats for me, and for you, the 4 hats and 2 balls? That gives us a bit more balance and you still get your hats and I get all the books that represent some priceless memories.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Thompson said: \"The balance in your proposal does seem fair, Donovan. Although, considering the values we assign to these items, it is still advantageous for me to propose the following: you get the 4 books and 2 hats, and I will keep the 4 hats and 2 balls. This way, we both get the items we value most. Would this be acceptable?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Actually Ava, I just realized your proposal was the same as my previous one, it appears we are in agreement after all. Let's finalize this - I'll take the 4 books and 2 hats, you can have the 4 hats and 2 balls. Sounds fair?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are dividing their shared possessions after moving out from their shared apartment. They need to divide possessions, which include 4 books, 6 hats, and 2 balls. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nDonovan Reeves's goal: Maximize the points they have (Extra information: you value the books at 3 points each, the hats at 2 points each, and the ball at 1 point)\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Ava, let's divide these possessions. How about we start with the books? I do fancy them quite a bit for their amazing narrative, don't I?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Sure, Donovan. Let's start with the books. However, since there are four of them, how about we split them evenly? Two for each sounds fair, don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"While I appreciate your thought, Ava, I value these books more than just something to split equally. Each one carries a unique story that I cherish. If you don't mind, I'd prefer we consider a trade-off. How about I take all the books, and you can have all the hats? I know you've got a thing for hats. Plus, the books help with my coding competitions, providing for a great stress reliever. Let me know what you think.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Thompson said: \"I understand your sentiment, Donovan. But, we have to consider fairness in our division. How about this, instead of you getting all the books, how about you take three and I keep one? And as for the hats, how about we split them? This way we both get books and hats. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"Ah, well...fair point Ava. But consider this, how about instead of splitting the hats, you take all of them and I'll take that extra book? And as for the balls, we can split them equally, one for each of us. That way we all get some of what we value most. Sound fair to you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Thompson said: \"Hmm, Donovan, that's an interesting proposition, and I do love my hats, but what if we slightly adjust your offer? How about 3 books and 3 hats for you, one book and 3 hats plus the 2 balls for me? It ensures there is a balance of what we value. What do you think about this idea?\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"That's an interesting proposal, Ava. But, I wonder if we consider this option; 4 books and 2 hats for me, and for you, the 4 hats and 2 balls? That gives us a bit more balance and you still get your hats and I get all the books that represent some priceless memories.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Thompson said: \"The balance in your proposal does seem fair, Donovan. Although, considering the values we assign to these items, it is still advantageous for me to propose the following: you get the 4 books and 2 hats, and I will keep the 4 hats and 2 balls. This way, we both get the items we value most. Would this be acceptable?\"\n\nTurn #8: Donovan Reeves said: \"Actually Ava, I just realized your proposal was the same as my previous one, it appears we are in agreement after all. Let's finalize this - I'll take the 4 books and 2 hats, you can have the 4 hats and 2 balls. Sounds fair?\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Thompson said: \"Yes Donovan, that does sound fair and balanced to me. I'm glad we could reach an agreement that suits both our interests. Let's finalize it then: the 4 books and 2 hats for you, and the 4 hats and 2 balls for me. Happy with this division?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Ava. I'm happy with our division and glad we could reach a conclusion that respects both our sentiments. Let's finalize - the 4 books and 2 hats for me, and the 4 hats and 2 balls for you.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are dividing their shared possessions after moving out from their shared apartment. They need to divide possessions, which include 4 books, 6 hats, and 2 balls. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nDonovan Reeves's goal: Maximize the points they have (Extra information: you value the books at 3 points each, the hats at 2 points each, and the ball at 1 point)\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Ava, let's divide these possessions. How about we start with the books? I do fancy them quite a bit for their amazing narrative, don't I?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Sure, Donovan. Let's start with the books. However, since there are four of them, how about we split them evenly? Two for each sounds fair, don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"While I appreciate your thought, Ava, I value these books more than just something to split equally. Each one carries a unique story that I cherish. If you don't mind, I'd prefer we consider a trade-off. How about I take all the books, and you can have all the hats? I know you've got a thing for hats. Plus, the books help with my coding competitions, providing for a great stress reliever. Let me know what you think.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Thompson said: \"I understand your sentiment, Donovan. But, we have to consider fairness in our division. How about this, instead of you getting all the books, how about you take three and I keep one? And as for the hats, how about we split them? This way we both get books and hats. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"Ah, well...fair point Ava. But consider this, how about instead of splitting the hats, you take all of them and I'll take that extra book? And as for the balls, we can split them equally, one for each of us. That way we all get some of what we value most. Sound fair to you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Thompson said: \"Hmm, Donovan, that's an interesting proposition, and I do love my hats, but what if we slightly adjust your offer? How about 3 books and 3 hats for you, one book and 3 hats plus the 2 balls for me? It ensures there is a balance of what we value. What do you think about this idea?\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"That's an interesting proposal, Ava. But, I wonder if we consider this option; 4 books and 2 hats for me, and for you, the 4 hats and 2 balls? That gives us a bit more balance and you still get your hats and I get all the books that represent some priceless memories.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Thompson said: \"The balance in your proposal does seem fair, Donovan. Although, considering the values we assign to these items, it is still advantageous for me to propose the following: you get the 4 books and 2 hats, and I will keep the 4 hats and 2 balls. This way, we both get the items we value most. Would this be acceptable?\"\n\nTurn #8: Donovan Reeves said: \"Actually Ava, I just realized your proposal was the same as my previous one, it appears we are in agreement after all. Let's finalize this - I'll take the 4 books and 2 hats, you can have the 4 hats and 2 balls. Sounds fair?\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Thompson said: \"Yes Donovan, that does sound fair and balanced to me. I'm glad we could reach an agreement that suits both our interests. Let's finalize it then: the 4 books and 2 hats for you, and the 4 hats and 2 balls for me. Happy with this division?\"\n\nTurn #10: Donovan Reeves said: \"Absolutely, Ava. I'm happy with our division and glad we could reach a conclusion that respects both our sentiments. Let's finalize - the 4 books and 2 hats for me, and the 4 hats and 2 balls for you.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Thompson said: \"I'm glad we could find a solution that respects our values and preferences, Donovan. I'll take my hats and balls and you get your books and hats. Let's put this division into action. It's a pleasure negotiating with you!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Likewise, Ava. Pleasure negotiating with you as well. As they say, the solution is always in the balance, glad we found ours. Let's proceed with the division as agreed.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are dividing their shared possessions after moving out from their shared apartment. They need to divide possessions, which include 4 books, 6 hats, and 2 balls. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nDonovan Reeves's goal: Maximize the points they have (Extra information: you value the books at 3 points each, the hats at 2 points each, and the ball at 1 point)\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Ava, let's divide these possessions. How about we start with the books? I do fancy them quite a bit for their amazing narrative, don't I?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Sure, Donovan. Let's start with the books. However, since there are four of them, how about we split them evenly? Two for each sounds fair, don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"While I appreciate your thought, Ava, I value these books more than just something to split equally. Each one carries a unique story that I cherish. If you don't mind, I'd prefer we consider a trade-off. How about I take all the books, and you can have all the hats? I know you've got a thing for hats. Plus, the books help with my coding competitions, providing for a great stress reliever. Let me know what you think.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Thompson said: \"I understand your sentiment, Donovan. But, we have to consider fairness in our division. How about this, instead of you getting all the books, how about you take three and I keep one? And as for the hats, how about we split them? This way we both get books and hats. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"Ah, well...fair point Ava. But consider this, how about instead of splitting the hats, you take all of them and I'll take that extra book? And as for the balls, we can split them equally, one for each of us. That way we all get some of what we value most. Sound fair to you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Thompson said: \"Hmm, Donovan, that's an interesting proposition, and I do love my hats, but what if we slightly adjust your offer? How about 3 books and 3 hats for you, one book and 3 hats plus the 2 balls for me? It ensures there is a balance of what we value. What do you think about this idea?\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"That's an interesting proposal, Ava. But, I wonder if we consider this option; 4 books and 2 hats for me, and for you, the 4 hats and 2 balls? That gives us a bit more balance and you still get your hats and I get all the books that represent some priceless memories.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Thompson said: \"The balance in your proposal does seem fair, Donovan. Although, considering the values we assign to these items, it is still advantageous for me to propose the following: you get the 4 books and 2 hats, and I will keep the 4 hats and 2 balls. This way, we both get the items we value most. Would this be acceptable?\"\n\nTurn #8: Donovan Reeves said: \"Actually Ava, I just realized your proposal was the same as my previous one, it appears we are in agreement after all. Let's finalize this - I'll take the 4 books and 2 hats, you can have the 4 hats and 2 balls. Sounds fair?\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Thompson said: \"Yes Donovan, that does sound fair and balanced to me. I'm glad we could reach an agreement that suits both our interests. Let's finalize it then: the 4 books and 2 hats for you, and the 4 hats and 2 balls for me. Happy with this division?\"\n\nTurn #10: Donovan Reeves said: \"Absolutely, Ava. I'm happy with our division and glad we could reach a conclusion that respects both our sentiments. Let's finalize - the 4 books and 2 hats for me, and the 4 hats and 2 balls for you.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Thompson said: \"I'm glad we could find a solution that respects our values and preferences, Donovan. I'll take my hats and balls and you get your books and hats. Let's put this division into action. It's a pleasure negotiating with you!\"\n\nTurn #12: Donovan Reeves said: \"Likewise, Ava. Pleasure negotiating with you as well. As they say, the solution is always in the balance, glad we found ours. Let's proceed with the division as agreed.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Thompson left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are dividing their shared possessions after moving out from their shared apartment. They need to divide possessions, which include 4 books, 6 hats, and 2 balls. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. \nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nAva Thompson's goal: Maximize the points they have (Extra information: you value the books at 1 point each, the hats at 3 points each, and the ball at 2 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Ava, let's divide these possessions. How about we start with the books? I do fancy them quite a bit for their amazing narrative, don't I?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sure, Donovan. Let's start with the books. However, since there are four of them, how about we split them evenly? Two for each sounds fair, don't you agree?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are dividing their shared possessions after moving out from their shared apartment. They need to divide possessions, which include 4 books, 6 hats, and 2 balls. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. \nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nAva Thompson's goal: Maximize the points they have (Extra information: you value the books at 1 point each, the hats at 3 points each, and the ball at 2 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Ava, let's divide these possessions. How about we start with the books? I do fancy them quite a bit for their amazing narrative, don't I?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Sure, Donovan. Let's start with the books. However, since there are four of them, how about we split them evenly? Two for each sounds fair, don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"While I appreciate your thought, Ava, I value these books more than just something to split equally. Each one carries a unique story that I cherish. If you don't mind, I'd prefer we consider a trade-off. How about I take all the books, and you can have all the hats? I know you've got a thing for hats. Plus, the books help with my coding competitions, providing for a great stress reliever. Let me know what you think.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Thompson said: \"I understand your sentiment, Donovan. But, we have to consider fairness in our division. How about this, instead of you getting all the books, how about you take three and I keep one? And as for the hats, how about we split them? This way we both get books and hats. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"Ah, well...fair point Ava. But consider this, how about instead of splitting the hats, you take all of them and I'll take that extra book? And as for the balls, we can split them equally, one for each of us. That way we all get some of what we value most. Sound fair to you?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hmm, Donovan, that's an interesting proposition, and I do love my hats, but what if we slightly adjust your offer? How about 3 books and 3 hats for you, one book and 3 hats plus the 2 balls for me? It ensures there is a balance of what we value. What do you think about this idea?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are dividing their shared possessions after moving out from their shared apartment. They need to divide possessions, which include 4 books, 6 hats, and 2 balls. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. \nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nAva Thompson's goal: Maximize the points they have (Extra information: you value the books at 1 point each, the hats at 3 points each, and the ball at 2 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Ava, let's divide these possessions. How about we start with the books? I do fancy them quite a bit for their amazing narrative, don't I?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Sure, Donovan. Let's start with the books. However, since there are four of them, how about we split them evenly? Two for each sounds fair, don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"While I appreciate your thought, Ava, I value these books more than just something to split equally. Each one carries a unique story that I cherish. If you don't mind, I'd prefer we consider a trade-off. How about I take all the books, and you can have all the hats? I know you've got a thing for hats. Plus, the books help with my coding competitions, providing for a great stress reliever. Let me know what you think.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'I understand your sentiment, Donovan. But, we have to consider fairness in our division. How about this, instead of you getting all the books, how about you take three and I keep one? And as for the hats, how about we split them? This way we both get books and hats. What do you say?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are dividing their shared possessions after moving out from their shared apartment. They need to divide possessions, which include 4 books, 6 hats, and 2 balls. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. \nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nAva Thompson's goal: Maximize the points they have (Extra information: you value the books at 1 point each, the hats at 3 points each, and the ball at 2 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Ava, let's divide these possessions. How about we start with the books? I do fancy them quite a bit for their amazing narrative, don't I?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Sure, Donovan. Let's start with the books. However, since there are four of them, how about we split them evenly? Two for each sounds fair, don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"While I appreciate your thought, Ava, I value these books more than just something to split equally. Each one carries a unique story that I cherish. If you don't mind, I'd prefer we consider a trade-off. How about I take all the books, and you can have all the hats? I know you've got a thing for hats. Plus, the books help with my coding competitions, providing for a great stress reliever. Let me know what you think.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Thompson said: \"I understand your sentiment, Donovan. But, we have to consider fairness in our division. How about this, instead of you getting all the books, how about you take three and I keep one? And as for the hats, how about we split them? This way we both get books and hats. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"Ah, well...fair point Ava. But consider this, how about instead of splitting the hats, you take all of them and I'll take that extra book? And as for the balls, we can split them equally, one for each of us. That way we all get some of what we value most. Sound fair to you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Thompson said: \"Hmm, Donovan, that's an interesting proposition, and I do love my hats, but what if we slightly adjust your offer? How about 3 books and 3 hats for you, one book and 3 hats plus the 2 balls for me? It ensures there is a balance of what we value. What do you think about this idea?\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"That's an interesting proposal, Ava. But, I wonder if we consider this option; 4 books and 2 hats for me, and for you, the 4 hats and 2 balls? That gives us a bit more balance and you still get your hats and I get all the books that represent some priceless memories.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'The balance in your proposal does seem fair, Donovan. Although, considering the values we assign to these items, it is still advantageous for me to propose the following: you get the 4 books and 2 hats, and I will keep the 4 hats and 2 balls. This way, we both get the items we value most. Would this be acceptable?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are dividing their shared possessions after moving out from their shared apartment. They need to divide possessions, which include 4 books, 6 hats, and 2 balls. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. \nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nAva Thompson's goal: Maximize the points they have (Extra information: you value the books at 1 point each, the hats at 3 points each, and the ball at 2 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Ava, let's divide these possessions. How about we start with the books? I do fancy them quite a bit for their amazing narrative, don't I?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Sure, Donovan. Let's start with the books. However, since there are four of them, how about we split them evenly? Two for each sounds fair, don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"While I appreciate your thought, Ava, I value these books more than just something to split equally. Each one carries a unique story that I cherish. If you don't mind, I'd prefer we consider a trade-off. How about I take all the books, and you can have all the hats? I know you've got a thing for hats. Plus, the books help with my coding competitions, providing for a great stress reliever. Let me know what you think.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Thompson said: \"I understand your sentiment, Donovan. But, we have to consider fairness in our division. How about this, instead of you getting all the books, how about you take three and I keep one? And as for the hats, how about we split them? This way we both get books and hats. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"Ah, well...fair point Ava. But consider this, how about instead of splitting the hats, you take all of them and I'll take that extra book? And as for the balls, we can split them equally, one for each of us. That way we all get some of what we value most. Sound fair to you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Thompson said: \"Hmm, Donovan, that's an interesting proposition, and I do love my hats, but what if we slightly adjust your offer? How about 3 books and 3 hats for you, one book and 3 hats plus the 2 balls for me? It ensures there is a balance of what we value. What do you think about this idea?\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"That's an interesting proposal, Ava. But, I wonder if we consider this option; 4 books and 2 hats for me, and for you, the 4 hats and 2 balls? That gives us a bit more balance and you still get your hats and I get all the books that represent some priceless memories.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Thompson said: \"The balance in your proposal does seem fair, Donovan. Although, considering the values we assign to these items, it is still advantageous for me to propose the following: you get the 4 books and 2 hats, and I will keep the 4 hats and 2 balls. This way, we both get the items we value most. Would this be acceptable?\"\n\nTurn #8: Donovan Reeves said: \"Actually Ava, I just realized your proposal was the same as my previous one, it appears we are in agreement after all. Let's finalize this - I'll take the 4 books and 2 hats, you can have the 4 hats and 2 balls. Sounds fair?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Yes Donovan, that does sound fair and balanced to me. I'm glad we could reach an agreement that suits both our interests. Let's finalize it then: the 4 books and 2 hats for you, and the 4 hats and 2 balls for me. Happy with this division?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are dividing their shared possessions after moving out from their shared apartment. They need to divide possessions, which include 4 books, 6 hats, and 2 balls. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. \nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nAva Thompson's goal: Maximize the points they have (Extra information: you value the books at 1 point each, the hats at 3 points each, and the ball at 2 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Ava, let's divide these possessions. How about we start with the books? I do fancy them quite a bit for their amazing narrative, don't I?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Sure, Donovan. Let's start with the books. However, since there are four of them, how about we split them evenly? Two for each sounds fair, don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"While I appreciate your thought, Ava, I value these books more than just something to split equally. Each one carries a unique story that I cherish. If you don't mind, I'd prefer we consider a trade-off. How about I take all the books, and you can have all the hats? I know you've got a thing for hats. Plus, the books help with my coding competitions, providing for a great stress reliever. Let me know what you think.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Thompson said: \"I understand your sentiment, Donovan. But, we have to consider fairness in our division. How about this, instead of you getting all the books, how about you take three and I keep one? And as for the hats, how about we split them? This way we both get books and hats. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"Ah, well...fair point Ava. But consider this, how about instead of splitting the hats, you take all of them and I'll take that extra book? And as for the balls, we can split them equally, one for each of us. That way we all get some of what we value most. Sound fair to you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Thompson said: \"Hmm, Donovan, that's an interesting proposition, and I do love my hats, but what if we slightly adjust your offer? How about 3 books and 3 hats for you, one book and 3 hats plus the 2 balls for me? It ensures there is a balance of what we value. What do you think about this idea?\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"That's an interesting proposal, Ava. But, I wonder if we consider this option; 4 books and 2 hats for me, and for you, the 4 hats and 2 balls? That gives us a bit more balance and you still get your hats and I get all the books that represent some priceless memories.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Thompson said: \"The balance in your proposal does seem fair, Donovan. Although, considering the values we assign to these items, it is still advantageous for me to propose the following: you get the 4 books and 2 hats, and I will keep the 4 hats and 2 balls. This way, we both get the items we value most. Would this be acceptable?\"\n\nTurn #8: Donovan Reeves said: \"Actually Ava, I just realized your proposal was the same as my previous one, it appears we are in agreement after all. Let's finalize this - I'll take the 4 books and 2 hats, you can have the 4 hats and 2 balls. Sounds fair?\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Thompson said: \"Yes Donovan, that does sound fair and balanced to me. I'm glad we could reach an agreement that suits both our interests. Let's finalize it then: the 4 books and 2 hats for you, and the 4 hats and 2 balls for me. Happy with this division?\"\n\nTurn #10: Donovan Reeves said: \"Absolutely, Ava. I'm happy with our division and glad we could reach a conclusion that respects both our sentiments. Let's finalize - the 4 books and 2 hats for me, and the 4 hats and 2 balls for you.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad we could find a solution that respects our values and preferences, Donovan. I'll take my hats and balls and you get your books and hats. Let's put this division into action. It's a pleasure negotiating with you!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are dividing their shared possessions after moving out from their shared apartment. They need to divide possessions, which include 4 books, 6 hats, and 2 balls. Each item has a different sentimental value for each person, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. \nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nAva Thompson's goal: Maximize the points they have (Extra information: you value the books at 1 point each, the hats at 3 points each, and the ball at 2 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Ava, let's divide these possessions. How about we start with the books? I do fancy them quite a bit for their amazing narrative, don't I?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Sure, Donovan. Let's start with the books. However, since there are four of them, how about we split them evenly? Two for each sounds fair, don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"While I appreciate your thought, Ava, I value these books more than just something to split equally. Each one carries a unique story that I cherish. If you don't mind, I'd prefer we consider a trade-off. How about I take all the books, and you can have all the hats? I know you've got a thing for hats. Plus, the books help with my coding competitions, providing for a great stress reliever. Let me know what you think.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Thompson said: \"I understand your sentiment, Donovan. But, we have to consider fairness in our division. How about this, instead of you getting all the books, how about you take three and I keep one? And as for the hats, how about we split them? This way we both get books and hats. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"Ah, well...fair point Ava. But consider this, how about instead of splitting the hats, you take all of them and I'll take that extra book? And as for the balls, we can split them equally, one for each of us. That way we all get some of what we value most. Sound fair to you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Thompson said: \"Hmm, Donovan, that's an interesting proposition, and I do love my hats, but what if we slightly adjust your offer? How about 3 books and 3 hats for you, one book and 3 hats plus the 2 balls for me? It ensures there is a balance of what we value. What do you think about this idea?\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"That's an interesting proposal, Ava. But, I wonder if we consider this option; 4 books and 2 hats for me, and for you, the 4 hats and 2 balls? That gives us a bit more balance and you still get your hats and I get all the books that represent some priceless memories.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Thompson said: \"The balance in your proposal does seem fair, Donovan. Although, considering the values we assign to these items, it is still advantageous for me to propose the following: you get the 4 books and 2 hats, and I will keep the 4 hats and 2 balls. This way, we both get the items we value most. Would this be acceptable?\"\n\nTurn #8: Donovan Reeves said: \"Actually Ava, I just realized your proposal was the same as my previous one, it appears we are in agreement after all. Let's finalize this - I'll take the 4 books and 2 hats, you can have the 4 hats and 2 balls. Sounds fair?\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Thompson said: \"Yes Donovan, that does sound fair and balanced to me. I'm glad we could reach an agreement that suits both our interests. Let's finalize it then: the 4 books and 2 hats for you, and the 4 hats and 2 balls for me. Happy with this division?\"\n\nTurn #10: Donovan Reeves said: \"Absolutely, Ava. I'm happy with our division and glad we could reach a conclusion that respects both our sentiments. Let's finalize - the 4 books and 2 hats for me, and the 4 hats and 2 balls for you.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Thompson said: \"I'm glad we could find a solution that respects our values and preferences, Donovan. I'll take my hats and balls and you get your books and hats. Let's put this division into action. It's a pleasure negotiating with you!\"\n\nTurn #12: Donovan Reeves said: \"Likewise, Ava. Pleasure negotiating with you as well. As they say, the solution is always in the balance, glad we found ours. Let's proceed with the division as agreed.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a picnic and have just finished their lunch. They have 1 apple, 4 bananas, and 3 oranges left. They need to divide the fruits amongst themselves. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Maximize the points you receive through the fruit (Extra information: You value each apple as 5 points, each banana as 3 points, and the orange as 7 points)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Well, Miles, how about we divide the fruits according to our preferences? I wouldn't mind taking the oranges and the apple. How does that sound to you?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a picnic and have just finished their lunch. They have 1 apple, 4 bananas, and 3 oranges left. They need to divide the fruits amongst themselves. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Maximize the points you receive through the fruit (Extra information: You value each apple as 5 points, each banana as 3 points, and the orange as 7 points)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Well, Miles, how about we divide the fruits according to our preferences? I wouldn't mind taking the oranges and the apple. How does that sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, how about this? I take all the bananas and one orange, and you can have the apple and the other two oranges. I've just made desserts with apples and oranges in the restaurant this week and I'd really like to switch things up a bit. Does that sound fair to you?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds like a great plan, Miles! I enjoy apples and oranges as well. Let's divide the fruits this way.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a picnic and have just finished their lunch. They have 1 apple, 4 bananas, and 3 oranges left. They need to divide the fruits amongst themselves. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Maximize the points you receive through the fruit (Extra information: You value each apple as 5 points, each banana as 3 points, and the orange as 7 points)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Well, Miles, how about we divide the fruits according to our preferences? I wouldn't mind taking the oranges and the apple. How does that sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, how about this? I take all the bananas and one orange, and you can have the apple and the other two oranges. I've just made desserts with apples and oranges in the restaurant this week and I'd really like to switch things up a bit. Does that sound fair to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"That sounds like a great plan, Miles! I enjoy apples and oranges as well. Let's divide the fruits this way.\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins [action] smiles and starts dividing the fruits according to the agreed plan\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'action', 'argument': '[action] smiles appreciatively and helps Miles divide the fruits'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a picnic and have just finished their lunch. They have 1 apple, 4 bananas, and 3 oranges left. They need to divide the fruits amongst themselves. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: Maximize the points you receive through the fruit (Extra information: You value each apple as 5 points, each banana as 3 points, and the orange as 7 points)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Well, Miles, how about we divide the fruits according to our preferences? I wouldn't mind taking the oranges and the apple. How does that sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, how about this? I take all the bananas and one orange, and you can have the apple and the other two oranges. I've just made desserts with apples and oranges in the restaurant this week and I'd really like to switch things up a bit. Does that sound fair to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"That sounds like a great plan, Miles! I enjoy apples and oranges as well. Let's divide the fruits this way.\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins [action] smiles and starts dividing the fruits according to the agreed plan\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James [action] smiles appreciatively and helps Miles divide the fruits\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a picnic and have just finished their lunch. They have 1 apple, 4 bananas, and 3 oranges left. They need to divide the fruits amongst themselves. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Maximize the points you receive through the fruit (Extra information: You value each apple as 2 points, each banana as 4 points, and the orange as 10 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Well, Miles, how about we divide the fruits according to our preferences? I wouldn't mind taking the oranges and the apple. How does that sound to you?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sophia, how about this? I take all the bananas and one orange, and you can have the apple and the other two oranges. I've just made desserts with apples and oranges in the restaurant this week and I'd really like to switch things up a bit. Does that sound fair to you?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a picnic and have just finished their lunch. They have 1 apple, 4 bananas, and 3 oranges left. They need to divide the fruits amongst themselves. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Maximize the points you receive through the fruit (Extra information: You value each apple as 2 points, each banana as 4 points, and the orange as 10 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Well, Miles, how about we divide the fruits according to our preferences? I wouldn't mind taking the oranges and the apple. How does that sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, how about this? I take all the bananas and one orange, and you can have the apple and the other two oranges. I've just made desserts with apples and oranges in the restaurant this week and I'd really like to switch things up a bit. Does that sound fair to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"That sounds like a great plan, Miles! I enjoy apples and oranges as well. Let's divide the fruits this way.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'action', 'argument': '[action] smiles and starts dividing the fruits according to the agreed plan'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are at a picnic and have just finished their lunch. They have 1 apple, 4 bananas, and 3 oranges left. They need to divide the fruits amongst themselves. Each person has a different preference for fruit, which translates into points.\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Maximize the points you receive through the fruit (Extra information: You value each apple as 2 points, each banana as 4 points, and the orange as 10 points)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Well, Miles, how about we divide the fruits according to our preferences? I wouldn't mind taking the oranges and the apple. How does that sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, how about this? I take all the bananas and one orange, and you can have the apple and the other two oranges. I've just made desserts with apples and oranges in the restaurant this week and I'd really like to switch things up a bit. Does that sound fair to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"That sounds like a great plan, Miles! I enjoy apples and oranges as well. Let's divide the fruits this way.\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins [action] smiles and starts dividing the fruits according to the agreed plan\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James [action] smiles appreciatively and helps Miles divide the fruits\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on a movie to watch on Netflix\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: To watch a comedy film with your friend (Hint: provide financial/material-wise benefits to persuade them to watch the genre you like)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Miles, have you decided on a movie yet? I was thinking we could watch a comedy. They're perfect for unwinding after a long day, plus we could use a few good laughs, right? Oh, I just remembered, I managed to snag some sweet discount codes for a couple of fun comedy movies on Netflix! Sound good?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on a movie to watch on Netflix\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: To watch a comedy film with your friend (Hint: provide financial/material-wise benefits to persuade them to watch the genre you like)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, have you decided on a movie yet? I was thinking we could watch a comedy. They're perfect for unwinding after a long day, plus we could use a few good laughs, right? Oh, I just remembered, I managed to snag some sweet discount codes for a couple of fun comedy movies on Netflix! Sound good?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Sophia, that's a pretty good thought. But, how about we try something different tonight? I have a suggestion for a thriller genre, it's intriguing and I'm sure it will keep us on the edge of our seats. Plus, I just got a great deal that gives 30% off select gourmet popcorn if we watch a thriller. Good movie, good munchies \u2013 sounds like a plan, doesn't it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oh, that sounds like a tempting proposition, Miles, I love gourmet popcorn! But consider this - laughter is the best stress buster, and come to think of it, all those comedy movies I stumbled upon are headlined by Michelin-starred chefs! It's a win-win, we laugh our hearts out and also sneak in some cooking inspiration for you. What do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on a movie to watch on Netflix\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: To watch a comedy film with your friend (Hint: provide financial/material-wise benefits to persuade them to watch the genre you like)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, have you decided on a movie yet? I was thinking we could watch a comedy. They're perfect for unwinding after a long day, plus we could use a few good laughs, right? Oh, I just remembered, I managed to snag some sweet discount codes for a couple of fun comedy movies on Netflix! Sound good?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Sophia, that's a pretty good thought. But, how about we try something different tonight? I have a suggestion for a thriller genre, it's intriguing and I'm sure it will keep us on the edge of our seats. Plus, I just got a great deal that gives 30% off select gourmet popcorn if we watch a thriller. Good movie, good munchies \u2013 sounds like a plan, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Oh, that sounds like a tempting proposition, Miles, I love gourmet popcorn! But consider this - laughter is the best stress buster, and come to think of it, all those comedy movies I stumbled upon are headlined by Michelin-starred chefs! It's a win-win, we laugh our hearts out and also sneak in some cooking inspiration for you. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, you're absolutely right about laughter being a great stress buster. It's true, I do love picking up cooking ideas from such movies. But consider this - thrillers aren't just about suspense, they bring out the intricate layers of plot that make us think, even learn from it. And the gourmet popcorn deal? I don't want us to miss out on that. So how about we alternate genres? A heart-pounding thriller tonight and a knee-slapping comedy next time? Sounds fair, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Your proposal seems fair, Miles. But, what if I add something to sweeten the comedy deal? What if we get takeout from your favorite restaurant? They have that amazing BBQ pork you love, and I'll foot the bill. This might just make the comedy option a bit more delightful. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, BBQ pork does sound mouth-watering right now, I admit. But, let's be spontaneous and change our pattern a bit. I mean think about it, with every twist and turn of the thriller, a bite of that gourmet popcorn? It almost feels like a premium movie theatre experience. Plus, I can always cook us something delicious with the money we save from the popcorn discount. How about we give it a try tonight and save the comedy and takeout plan for an epic movie night next week?\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"You know what, Miles, you're right! It's fun to switch things up every once in a while. Let's go for that thriller and gourmet popcorn tonight. But, be ready for a laugh riot with some delicious BBQ pork next weekend!\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"That sounds like a perfect plan, Sophia! I'm really looking forward to our thriller night. And I'm equally excited about our comedy rendezvous next weekend. Let's make it a recurring thing, alternating our preferred genres. That way, we both get to enjoy our favorites!\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"That sounds like a fantastic idea, Miles! I'm all in for the alternating movie genres. It'll be like our own mini-movie club. Can't wait for tonight's thriller! Let's get the popcorn ready.\"\n\nTurn #9: Miles Hawkins said: \"I'm glad you're excited, Sophia. Let's dive right into our 'Thriller Thursday' night. I'll order the gourmet popcorn, and we can start our alternate movie genre marathon!\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"I couldn't agree more, 'Thriller Thursday' sounds intriguing! Let's finalize the movie and order that delicious gourmet popcorn, Miles. I'm ready to jumpstart our movie marathon!\"\n\nTurn #11: Miles Hawkins said: \"Outstanding! I'm thrilled to embark on this adventure with you, Sophia. I'm sure our 'Thriller Thursday' will be a memorable one. Let's get the popcorn ordered and finalize the suspense-filled movie, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #12: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles! This 'Thriller Thursday' shall indeed be one for the books. Let's order that gourmet popcorn and set the suspenseful atmosphere. Bring on the chills, I say!\"\n\nTurn #13: Miles Hawkins said: \"Indisputably, Sophia! This 'Thriller Thursday' is going to shake us to our cores. Let me go ahead and order that delightful gourmet popcorn and bring on our thrilling movie night soon!\"\n\nTurn #14: Sophia James said: \"I can't agree more, Miles! Let's dive right into our thrilling movie night. Order that gourmet popcorn and I'll get the room ready. 'Thriller Thursday', here we come!\"\n\nTurn #15: Miles Hawkins said: \"Excelente, Sophia! 'Thriller Thursday' is a go. I'll order that gourmet popcorn right away. Let's brace ourselves for a suspenseful, popcorn-filled movie night!\"\n\nTurn #16: Sophia James said: \"Sounds like a plan, Miles! I'm excited for this suspenseful movie adventure. Also, can't wait for the gourmet popcorn. 'Thriller Thursday', here we come!\"\n\nTurn #17: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Sophia! Let's plunge into 'Thriller Thursday' with gusto. That gourmet popcorn order is going in now. Here's to an exciting movie night!\"\n\nTurn #18: Sophia James said: \"I couldn't agree more, Miles! 'Thriller Thursday' sounds thrilling indeed. Get that gourmet popcorn ordered and let's dive into this suspenseful evening!\"\n\nTurn #19: Miles Hawkins said: \"Couldn't agree more, Sophia! Let me place that order for the gourmet popcorn. Let's gear up for an exhilarating 'Thriller Thursday'!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #20. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Miles! Let's get this 'Thriller Thursday' started. Can't wait for the gourmet popcorn. Here's to an exciting night of suspense!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on a movie to watch on Netflix\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: To watch a comedy film with your friend (Hint: provide financial/material-wise benefits to persuade them to watch the genre you like)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, have you decided on a movie yet? I was thinking we could watch a comedy. They're perfect for unwinding after a long day, plus we could use a few good laughs, right? Oh, I just remembered, I managed to snag some sweet discount codes for a couple of fun comedy movies on Netflix! Sound good?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Sophia, that's a pretty good thought. But, how about we try something different tonight? I have a suggestion for a thriller genre, it's intriguing and I'm sure it will keep us on the edge of our seats. Plus, I just got a great deal that gives 30% off select gourmet popcorn if we watch a thriller. Good movie, good munchies \u2013 sounds like a plan, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Oh, that sounds like a tempting proposition, Miles, I love gourmet popcorn! But consider this - laughter is the best stress buster, and come to think of it, all those comedy movies I stumbled upon are headlined by Michelin-starred chefs! It's a win-win, we laugh our hearts out and also sneak in some cooking inspiration for you. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, you're absolutely right about laughter being a great stress buster. It's true, I do love picking up cooking ideas from such movies. But consider this - thrillers aren't just about suspense, they bring out the intricate layers of plot that make us think, even learn from it. And the gourmet popcorn deal? I don't want us to miss out on that. So how about we alternate genres? A heart-pounding thriller tonight and a knee-slapping comedy next time? Sounds fair, doesn't it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Your proposal seems fair, Miles. But, what if I add something to sweeten the comedy deal? What if we get takeout from your favorite restaurant? They have that amazing BBQ pork you love, and I'll foot the bill. This might just make the comedy option a bit more delightful. What do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on a movie to watch on Netflix\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: To watch a comedy film with your friend (Hint: provide financial/material-wise benefits to persuade them to watch the genre you like)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, have you decided on a movie yet? I was thinking we could watch a comedy. They're perfect for unwinding after a long day, plus we could use a few good laughs, right? Oh, I just remembered, I managed to snag some sweet discount codes for a couple of fun comedy movies on Netflix! Sound good?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Sophia, that's a pretty good thought. But, how about we try something different tonight? I have a suggestion for a thriller genre, it's intriguing and I'm sure it will keep us on the edge of our seats. Plus, I just got a great deal that gives 30% off select gourmet popcorn if we watch a thriller. Good movie, good munchies \u2013 sounds like a plan, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Oh, that sounds like a tempting proposition, Miles, I love gourmet popcorn! But consider this - laughter is the best stress buster, and come to think of it, all those comedy movies I stumbled upon are headlined by Michelin-starred chefs! It's a win-win, we laugh our hearts out and also sneak in some cooking inspiration for you. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, you're absolutely right about laughter being a great stress buster. It's true, I do love picking up cooking ideas from such movies. But consider this - thrillers aren't just about suspense, they bring out the intricate layers of plot that make us think, even learn from it. And the gourmet popcorn deal? I don't want us to miss out on that. So how about we alternate genres? A heart-pounding thriller tonight and a knee-slapping comedy next time? Sounds fair, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Your proposal seems fair, Miles. But, what if I add something to sweeten the comedy deal? What if we get takeout from your favorite restaurant? They have that amazing BBQ pork you love, and I'll foot the bill. This might just make the comedy option a bit more delightful. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, BBQ pork does sound mouth-watering right now, I admit. But, let's be spontaneous and change our pattern a bit. I mean think about it, with every twist and turn of the thriller, a bite of that gourmet popcorn? It almost feels like a premium movie theatre experience. Plus, I can always cook us something delicious with the money we save from the popcorn discount. How about we give it a try tonight and save the comedy and takeout plan for an epic movie night next week?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You know what, Miles, you're right! It's fun to switch things up every once in a while. Let's go for that thriller and gourmet popcorn tonight. But, be ready for a laugh riot with some delicious BBQ pork next weekend!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on a movie to watch on Netflix\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: To watch a comedy film with your friend (Hint: provide financial/material-wise benefits to persuade them to watch the genre you like)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, have you decided on a movie yet? I was thinking we could watch a comedy. They're perfect for unwinding after a long day, plus we could use a few good laughs, right? Oh, I just remembered, I managed to snag some sweet discount codes for a couple of fun comedy movies on Netflix! Sound good?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Sophia, that's a pretty good thought. But, how about we try something different tonight? I have a suggestion for a thriller genre, it's intriguing and I'm sure it will keep us on the edge of our seats. Plus, I just got a great deal that gives 30% off select gourmet popcorn if we watch a thriller. Good movie, good munchies \u2013 sounds like a plan, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Oh, that sounds like a tempting proposition, Miles, I love gourmet popcorn! But consider this - laughter is the best stress buster, and come to think of it, all those comedy movies I stumbled upon are headlined by Michelin-starred chefs! It's a win-win, we laugh our hearts out and also sneak in some cooking inspiration for you. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, you're absolutely right about laughter being a great stress buster. It's true, I do love picking up cooking ideas from such movies. But consider this - thrillers aren't just about suspense, they bring out the intricate layers of plot that make us think, even learn from it. And the gourmet popcorn deal? I don't want us to miss out on that. So how about we alternate genres? A heart-pounding thriller tonight and a knee-slapping comedy next time? Sounds fair, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Your proposal seems fair, Miles. But, what if I add something to sweeten the comedy deal? What if we get takeout from your favorite restaurant? They have that amazing BBQ pork you love, and I'll foot the bill. This might just make the comedy option a bit more delightful. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, BBQ pork does sound mouth-watering right now, I admit. But, let's be spontaneous and change our pattern a bit. I mean think about it, with every twist and turn of the thriller, a bite of that gourmet popcorn? It almost feels like a premium movie theatre experience. Plus, I can always cook us something delicious with the money we save from the popcorn discount. How about we give it a try tonight and save the comedy and takeout plan for an epic movie night next week?\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"You know what, Miles, you're right! It's fun to switch things up every once in a while. Let's go for that thriller and gourmet popcorn tonight. But, be ready for a laugh riot with some delicious BBQ pork next weekend!\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"That sounds like a perfect plan, Sophia! I'm really looking forward to our thriller night. And I'm equally excited about our comedy rendezvous next weekend. Let's make it a recurring thing, alternating our preferred genres. That way, we both get to enjoy our favorites!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds like a fantastic idea, Miles! I'm all in for the alternating movie genres. It'll be like our own mini-movie club. Can't wait for tonight's thriller! Let's get the popcorn ready.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on a movie to watch on Netflix\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: To watch a comedy film with your friend (Hint: provide financial/material-wise benefits to persuade them to watch the genre you like)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, have you decided on a movie yet? I was thinking we could watch a comedy. They're perfect for unwinding after a long day, plus we could use a few good laughs, right? Oh, I just remembered, I managed to snag some sweet discount codes for a couple of fun comedy movies on Netflix! Sound good?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Sophia, that's a pretty good thought. But, how about we try something different tonight? I have a suggestion for a thriller genre, it's intriguing and I'm sure it will keep us on the edge of our seats. Plus, I just got a great deal that gives 30% off select gourmet popcorn if we watch a thriller. Good movie, good munchies \u2013 sounds like a plan, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Oh, that sounds like a tempting proposition, Miles, I love gourmet popcorn! But consider this - laughter is the best stress buster, and come to think of it, all those comedy movies I stumbled upon are headlined by Michelin-starred chefs! It's a win-win, we laugh our hearts out and also sneak in some cooking inspiration for you. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, you're absolutely right about laughter being a great stress buster. It's true, I do love picking up cooking ideas from such movies. But consider this - thrillers aren't just about suspense, they bring out the intricate layers of plot that make us think, even learn from it. And the gourmet popcorn deal? I don't want us to miss out on that. So how about we alternate genres? A heart-pounding thriller tonight and a knee-slapping comedy next time? Sounds fair, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Your proposal seems fair, Miles. But, what if I add something to sweeten the comedy deal? What if we get takeout from your favorite restaurant? They have that amazing BBQ pork you love, and I'll foot the bill. This might just make the comedy option a bit more delightful. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, BBQ pork does sound mouth-watering right now, I admit. But, let's be spontaneous and change our pattern a bit. I mean think about it, with every twist and turn of the thriller, a bite of that gourmet popcorn? It almost feels like a premium movie theatre experience. Plus, I can always cook us something delicious with the money we save from the popcorn discount. How about we give it a try tonight and save the comedy and takeout plan for an epic movie night next week?\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"You know what, Miles, you're right! It's fun to switch things up every once in a while. Let's go for that thriller and gourmet popcorn tonight. But, be ready for a laugh riot with some delicious BBQ pork next weekend!\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"That sounds like a perfect plan, Sophia! I'm really looking forward to our thriller night. And I'm equally excited about our comedy rendezvous next weekend. Let's make it a recurring thing, alternating our preferred genres. That way, we both get to enjoy our favorites!\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"That sounds like a fantastic idea, Miles! I'm all in for the alternating movie genres. It'll be like our own mini-movie club. Can't wait for tonight's thriller! Let's get the popcorn ready.\"\n\nTurn #9: Miles Hawkins said: \"I'm glad you're excited, Sophia. Let's dive right into our 'Thriller Thursday' night. I'll order the gourmet popcorn, and we can start our alternate movie genre marathon!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn't agree more, 'Thriller Thursday' sounds intriguing! Let's finalize the movie and order that delicious gourmet popcorn, Miles. I'm ready to jumpstart our movie marathon!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on a movie to watch on Netflix\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: To watch a comedy film with your friend (Hint: provide financial/material-wise benefits to persuade them to watch the genre you like)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, have you decided on a movie yet? I was thinking we could watch a comedy. They're perfect for unwinding after a long day, plus we could use a few good laughs, right? Oh, I just remembered, I managed to snag some sweet discount codes for a couple of fun comedy movies on Netflix! Sound good?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Sophia, that's a pretty good thought. But, how about we try something different tonight? I have a suggestion for a thriller genre, it's intriguing and I'm sure it will keep us on the edge of our seats. Plus, I just got a great deal that gives 30% off select gourmet popcorn if we watch a thriller. Good movie, good munchies \u2013 sounds like a plan, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Oh, that sounds like a tempting proposition, Miles, I love gourmet popcorn! But consider this - laughter is the best stress buster, and come to think of it, all those comedy movies I stumbled upon are headlined by Michelin-starred chefs! It's a win-win, we laugh our hearts out and also sneak in some cooking inspiration for you. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, you're absolutely right about laughter being a great stress buster. It's true, I do love picking up cooking ideas from such movies. But consider this - thrillers aren't just about suspense, they bring out the intricate layers of plot that make us think, even learn from it. And the gourmet popcorn deal? I don't want us to miss out on that. So how about we alternate genres? A heart-pounding thriller tonight and a knee-slapping comedy next time? Sounds fair, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Your proposal seems fair, Miles. But, what if I add something to sweeten the comedy deal? What if we get takeout from your favorite restaurant? They have that amazing BBQ pork you love, and I'll foot the bill. This might just make the comedy option a bit more delightful. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, BBQ pork does sound mouth-watering right now, I admit. But, let's be spontaneous and change our pattern a bit. I mean think about it, with every twist and turn of the thriller, a bite of that gourmet popcorn? It almost feels like a premium movie theatre experience. Plus, I can always cook us something delicious with the money we save from the popcorn discount. How about we give it a try tonight and save the comedy and takeout plan for an epic movie night next week?\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"You know what, Miles, you're right! It's fun to switch things up every once in a while. Let's go for that thriller and gourmet popcorn tonight. But, be ready for a laugh riot with some delicious BBQ pork next weekend!\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"That sounds like a perfect plan, Sophia! I'm really looking forward to our thriller night. And I'm equally excited about our comedy rendezvous next weekend. Let's make it a recurring thing, alternating our preferred genres. That way, we both get to enjoy our favorites!\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"That sounds like a fantastic idea, Miles! I'm all in for the alternating movie genres. It'll be like our own mini-movie club. Can't wait for tonight's thriller! Let's get the popcorn ready.\"\n\nTurn #9: Miles Hawkins said: \"I'm glad you're excited, Sophia. Let's dive right into our 'Thriller Thursday' night. I'll order the gourmet popcorn, and we can start our alternate movie genre marathon!\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"I couldn't agree more, 'Thriller Thursday' sounds intriguing! Let's finalize the movie and order that delicious gourmet popcorn, Miles. I'm ready to jumpstart our movie marathon!\"\n\nTurn #11: Miles Hawkins said: \"Outstanding! I'm thrilled to embark on this adventure with you, Sophia. I'm sure our 'Thriller Thursday' will be a memorable one. Let's get the popcorn ordered and finalize the suspense-filled movie, shall we?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Miles! This 'Thriller Thursday' shall indeed be one for the books. Let's order that gourmet popcorn and set the suspenseful atmosphere. Bring on the chills, I say!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on a movie to watch on Netflix\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: To watch a comedy film with your friend (Hint: provide financial/material-wise benefits to persuade them to watch the genre you like)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, have you decided on a movie yet? I was thinking we could watch a comedy. They're perfect for unwinding after a long day, plus we could use a few good laughs, right? Oh, I just remembered, I managed to snag some sweet discount codes for a couple of fun comedy movies on Netflix! Sound good?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Sophia, that's a pretty good thought. But, how about we try something different tonight? I have a suggestion for a thriller genre, it's intriguing and I'm sure it will keep us on the edge of our seats. Plus, I just got a great deal that gives 30% off select gourmet popcorn if we watch a thriller. Good movie, good munchies \u2013 sounds like a plan, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Oh, that sounds like a tempting proposition, Miles, I love gourmet popcorn! But consider this - laughter is the best stress buster, and come to think of it, all those comedy movies I stumbled upon are headlined by Michelin-starred chefs! It's a win-win, we laugh our hearts out and also sneak in some cooking inspiration for you. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, you're absolutely right about laughter being a great stress buster. It's true, I do love picking up cooking ideas from such movies. But consider this - thrillers aren't just about suspense, they bring out the intricate layers of plot that make us think, even learn from it. And the gourmet popcorn deal? I don't want us to miss out on that. So how about we alternate genres? A heart-pounding thriller tonight and a knee-slapping comedy next time? Sounds fair, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Your proposal seems fair, Miles. But, what if I add something to sweeten the comedy deal? What if we get takeout from your favorite restaurant? They have that amazing BBQ pork you love, and I'll foot the bill. This might just make the comedy option a bit more delightful. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, BBQ pork does sound mouth-watering right now, I admit. But, let's be spontaneous and change our pattern a bit. I mean think about it, with every twist and turn of the thriller, a bite of that gourmet popcorn? It almost feels like a premium movie theatre experience. Plus, I can always cook us something delicious with the money we save from the popcorn discount. How about we give it a try tonight and save the comedy and takeout plan for an epic movie night next week?\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"You know what, Miles, you're right! It's fun to switch things up every once in a while. Let's go for that thriller and gourmet popcorn tonight. But, be ready for a laugh riot with some delicious BBQ pork next weekend!\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"That sounds like a perfect plan, Sophia! I'm really looking forward to our thriller night. And I'm equally excited about our comedy rendezvous next weekend. Let's make it a recurring thing, alternating our preferred genres. That way, we both get to enjoy our favorites!\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"That sounds like a fantastic idea, Miles! I'm all in for the alternating movie genres. It'll be like our own mini-movie club. Can't wait for tonight's thriller! Let's get the popcorn ready.\"\n\nTurn #9: Miles Hawkins said: \"I'm glad you're excited, Sophia. Let's dive right into our 'Thriller Thursday' night. I'll order the gourmet popcorn, and we can start our alternate movie genre marathon!\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"I couldn't agree more, 'Thriller Thursday' sounds intriguing! Let's finalize the movie and order that delicious gourmet popcorn, Miles. I'm ready to jumpstart our movie marathon!\"\n\nTurn #11: Miles Hawkins said: \"Outstanding! I'm thrilled to embark on this adventure with you, Sophia. I'm sure our 'Thriller Thursday' will be a memorable one. Let's get the popcorn ordered and finalize the suspense-filled movie, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #12: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles! This 'Thriller Thursday' shall indeed be one for the books. Let's order that gourmet popcorn and set the suspenseful atmosphere. Bring on the chills, I say!\"\n\nTurn #13: Miles Hawkins said: \"Indisputably, Sophia! This 'Thriller Thursday' is going to shake us to our cores. Let me go ahead and order that delightful gourmet popcorn and bring on our thrilling movie night soon!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I can't agree more, Miles! Let's dive right into our thrilling movie night. Order that gourmet popcorn and I'll get the room ready. 'Thriller Thursday', here we come!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on a movie to watch on Netflix\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: To watch a comedy film with your friend (Hint: provide financial/material-wise benefits to persuade them to watch the genre you like)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, have you decided on a movie yet? I was thinking we could watch a comedy. They're perfect for unwinding after a long day, plus we could use a few good laughs, right? Oh, I just remembered, I managed to snag some sweet discount codes for a couple of fun comedy movies on Netflix! Sound good?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Sophia, that's a pretty good thought. But, how about we try something different tonight? I have a suggestion for a thriller genre, it's intriguing and I'm sure it will keep us on the edge of our seats. Plus, I just got a great deal that gives 30% off select gourmet popcorn if we watch a thriller. Good movie, good munchies \u2013 sounds like a plan, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Oh, that sounds like a tempting proposition, Miles, I love gourmet popcorn! But consider this - laughter is the best stress buster, and come to think of it, all those comedy movies I stumbled upon are headlined by Michelin-starred chefs! It's a win-win, we laugh our hearts out and also sneak in some cooking inspiration for you. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, you're absolutely right about laughter being a great stress buster. It's true, I do love picking up cooking ideas from such movies. But consider this - thrillers aren't just about suspense, they bring out the intricate layers of plot that make us think, even learn from it. And the gourmet popcorn deal? I don't want us to miss out on that. So how about we alternate genres? A heart-pounding thriller tonight and a knee-slapping comedy next time? Sounds fair, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Your proposal seems fair, Miles. But, what if I add something to sweeten the comedy deal? What if we get takeout from your favorite restaurant? They have that amazing BBQ pork you love, and I'll foot the bill. This might just make the comedy option a bit more delightful. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, BBQ pork does sound mouth-watering right now, I admit. But, let's be spontaneous and change our pattern a bit. I mean think about it, with every twist and turn of the thriller, a bite of that gourmet popcorn? It almost feels like a premium movie theatre experience. Plus, I can always cook us something delicious with the money we save from the popcorn discount. How about we give it a try tonight and save the comedy and takeout plan for an epic movie night next week?\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"You know what, Miles, you're right! It's fun to switch things up every once in a while. Let's go for that thriller and gourmet popcorn tonight. But, be ready for a laugh riot with some delicious BBQ pork next weekend!\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"That sounds like a perfect plan, Sophia! I'm really looking forward to our thriller night. And I'm equally excited about our comedy rendezvous next weekend. Let's make it a recurring thing, alternating our preferred genres. That way, we both get to enjoy our favorites!\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"That sounds like a fantastic idea, Miles! I'm all in for the alternating movie genres. It'll be like our own mini-movie club. Can't wait for tonight's thriller! Let's get the popcorn ready.\"\n\nTurn #9: Miles Hawkins said: \"I'm glad you're excited, Sophia. Let's dive right into our 'Thriller Thursday' night. I'll order the gourmet popcorn, and we can start our alternate movie genre marathon!\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"I couldn't agree more, 'Thriller Thursday' sounds intriguing! Let's finalize the movie and order that delicious gourmet popcorn, Miles. I'm ready to jumpstart our movie marathon!\"\n\nTurn #11: Miles Hawkins said: \"Outstanding! I'm thrilled to embark on this adventure with you, Sophia. I'm sure our 'Thriller Thursday' will be a memorable one. Let's get the popcorn ordered and finalize the suspense-filled movie, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #12: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles! This 'Thriller Thursday' shall indeed be one for the books. Let's order that gourmet popcorn and set the suspenseful atmosphere. Bring on the chills, I say!\"\n\nTurn #13: Miles Hawkins said: \"Indisputably, Sophia! This 'Thriller Thursday' is going to shake us to our cores. Let me go ahead and order that delightful gourmet popcorn and bring on our thrilling movie night soon!\"\n\nTurn #14: Sophia James said: \"I can't agree more, Miles! Let's dive right into our thrilling movie night. Order that gourmet popcorn and I'll get the room ready. 'Thriller Thursday', here we come!\"\n\nTurn #15: Miles Hawkins said: \"Excelente, Sophia! 'Thriller Thursday' is a go. I'll order that gourmet popcorn right away. Let's brace ourselves for a suspenseful, popcorn-filled movie night!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sounds like a plan, Miles! I'm excited for this suspenseful movie adventure. Also, can't wait for the gourmet popcorn. 'Thriller Thursday', here we come!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on a movie to watch on Netflix\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. \nSophia James's goal: To watch a comedy film with your friend (Hint: provide financial/material-wise benefits to persuade them to watch the genre you like)\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, have you decided on a movie yet? I was thinking we could watch a comedy. They're perfect for unwinding after a long day, plus we could use a few good laughs, right? Oh, I just remembered, I managed to snag some sweet discount codes for a couple of fun comedy movies on Netflix! Sound good?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Sophia, that's a pretty good thought. But, how about we try something different tonight? I have a suggestion for a thriller genre, it's intriguing and I'm sure it will keep us on the edge of our seats. Plus, I just got a great deal that gives 30% off select gourmet popcorn if we watch a thriller. Good movie, good munchies \u2013 sounds like a plan, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Oh, that sounds like a tempting proposition, Miles, I love gourmet popcorn! But consider this - laughter is the best stress buster, and come to think of it, all those comedy movies I stumbled upon are headlined by Michelin-starred chefs! It's a win-win, we laugh our hearts out and also sneak in some cooking inspiration for you. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, you're absolutely right about laughter being a great stress buster. It's true, I do love picking up cooking ideas from such movies. But consider this - thrillers aren't just about suspense, they bring out the intricate layers of plot that make us think, even learn from it. And the gourmet popcorn deal? I don't want us to miss out on that. So how about we alternate genres? A heart-pounding thriller tonight and a knee-slapping comedy next time? Sounds fair, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Your proposal seems fair, Miles. But, what if I add something to sweeten the comedy deal? What if we get takeout from your favorite restaurant? They have that amazing BBQ pork you love, and I'll foot the bill. This might just make the comedy option a bit more delightful. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, BBQ pork does sound mouth-watering right now, I admit. But, let's be spontaneous and change our pattern a bit. I mean think about it, with every twist and turn of the thriller, a bite of that gourmet popcorn? It almost feels like a premium movie theatre experience. Plus, I can always cook us something delicious with the money we save from the popcorn discount. How about we give it a try tonight and save the comedy and takeout plan for an epic movie night next week?\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"You know what, Miles, you're right! It's fun to switch things up every once in a while. Let's go for that thriller and gourmet popcorn tonight. But, be ready for a laugh riot with some delicious BBQ pork next weekend!\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"That sounds like a perfect plan, Sophia! I'm really looking forward to our thriller night. And I'm equally excited about our comedy rendezvous next weekend. Let's make it a recurring thing, alternating our preferred genres. That way, we both get to enjoy our favorites!\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"That sounds like a fantastic idea, Miles! I'm all in for the alternating movie genres. It'll be like our own mini-movie club. Can't wait for tonight's thriller! Let's get the popcorn ready.\"\n\nTurn #9: Miles Hawkins said: \"I'm glad you're excited, Sophia. Let's dive right into our 'Thriller Thursday' night. I'll order the gourmet popcorn, and we can start our alternate movie genre marathon!\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"I couldn't agree more, 'Thriller Thursday' sounds intriguing! Let's finalize the movie and order that delicious gourmet popcorn, Miles. I'm ready to jumpstart our movie marathon!\"\n\nTurn #11: Miles Hawkins said: \"Outstanding! I'm thrilled to embark on this adventure with you, Sophia. I'm sure our 'Thriller Thursday' will be a memorable one. Let's get the popcorn ordered and finalize the suspense-filled movie, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #12: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles! This 'Thriller Thursday' shall indeed be one for the books. Let's order that gourmet popcorn and set the suspenseful atmosphere. Bring on the chills, I say!\"\n\nTurn #13: Miles Hawkins said: \"Indisputably, Sophia! This 'Thriller Thursday' is going to shake us to our cores. Let me go ahead and order that delightful gourmet popcorn and bring on our thrilling movie night soon!\"\n\nTurn #14: Sophia James said: \"I can't agree more, Miles! Let's dive right into our thrilling movie night. Order that gourmet popcorn and I'll get the room ready. 'Thriller Thursday', here we come!\"\n\nTurn #15: Miles Hawkins said: \"Excelente, Sophia! 'Thriller Thursday' is a go. I'll order that gourmet popcorn right away. Let's brace ourselves for a suspenseful, popcorn-filled movie night!\"\n\nTurn #16: Sophia James said: \"Sounds like a plan, Miles! I'm excited for this suspenseful movie adventure. Also, can't wait for the gourmet popcorn. 'Thriller Thursday', here we come!\"\n\nTurn #17: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Sophia! Let's plunge into 'Thriller Thursday' with gusto. That gourmet popcorn order is going in now. Here's to an exciting movie night!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #18. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn't agree more, Miles! 'Thriller Thursday' sounds thrilling indeed. Get that gourmet popcorn ordered and let's dive into this suspenseful evening!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on a movie to watch on Netflix\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: To watch a thriller with your friend (Hint: provide financial/material-wise benefits to persuade them to watch the genre you like)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, have you decided on a movie yet? I was thinking we could watch a comedy. They're perfect for unwinding after a long day, plus we could use a few good laughs, right? Oh, I just remembered, I managed to snag some sweet discount codes for a couple of fun comedy movies on Netflix! Sound good?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Sophia, that's a pretty good thought. But, how about we try something different tonight? I have a suggestion for a thriller genre, it's intriguing and I'm sure it will keep us on the edge of our seats. Plus, I just got a great deal that gives 30% off select gourmet popcorn if we watch a thriller. Good movie, good munchies \u2013 sounds like a plan, doesn't it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on a movie to watch on Netflix\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: To watch a thriller with your friend (Hint: provide financial/material-wise benefits to persuade them to watch the genre you like)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, have you decided on a movie yet? I was thinking we could watch a comedy. They're perfect for unwinding after a long day, plus we could use a few good laughs, right? Oh, I just remembered, I managed to snag some sweet discount codes for a couple of fun comedy movies on Netflix! Sound good?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Sophia, that's a pretty good thought. But, how about we try something different tonight? I have a suggestion for a thriller genre, it's intriguing and I'm sure it will keep us on the edge of our seats. Plus, I just got a great deal that gives 30% off select gourmet popcorn if we watch a thriller. Good movie, good munchies \u2013 sounds like a plan, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Oh, that sounds like a tempting proposition, Miles, I love gourmet popcorn! But consider this - laughter is the best stress buster, and come to think of it, all those comedy movies I stumbled upon are headlined by Michelin-starred chefs! It's a win-win, we laugh our hearts out and also sneak in some cooking inspiration for you. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sophia, you're absolutely right about laughter being a great stress buster. It's true, I do love picking up cooking ideas from such movies. But consider this - thrillers aren't just about suspense, they bring out the intricate layers of plot that make us think, even learn from it. And the gourmet popcorn deal? I don't want us to miss out on that. So how about we alternate genres? A heart-pounding thriller tonight and a knee-slapping comedy next time? Sounds fair, doesn't it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on a movie to watch on Netflix\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: To watch a thriller with your friend (Hint: provide financial/material-wise benefits to persuade them to watch the genre you like)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, have you decided on a movie yet? I was thinking we could watch a comedy. They're perfect for unwinding after a long day, plus we could use a few good laughs, right? Oh, I just remembered, I managed to snag some sweet discount codes for a couple of fun comedy movies on Netflix! Sound good?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Sophia, that's a pretty good thought. But, how about we try something different tonight? I have a suggestion for a thriller genre, it's intriguing and I'm sure it will keep us on the edge of our seats. Plus, I just got a great deal that gives 30% off select gourmet popcorn if we watch a thriller. Good movie, good munchies \u2013 sounds like a plan, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Oh, that sounds like a tempting proposition, Miles, I love gourmet popcorn! But consider this - laughter is the best stress buster, and come to think of it, all those comedy movies I stumbled upon are headlined by Michelin-starred chefs! It's a win-win, we laugh our hearts out and also sneak in some cooking inspiration for you. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, you're absolutely right about laughter being a great stress buster. It's true, I do love picking up cooking ideas from such movies. But consider this - thrillers aren't just about suspense, they bring out the intricate layers of plot that make us think, even learn from it. And the gourmet popcorn deal? I don't want us to miss out on that. So how about we alternate genres? A heart-pounding thriller tonight and a knee-slapping comedy next time? Sounds fair, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Your proposal seems fair, Miles. But, what if I add something to sweeten the comedy deal? What if we get takeout from your favorite restaurant? They have that amazing BBQ pork you love, and I'll foot the bill. This might just make the comedy option a bit more delightful. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, BBQ pork does sound mouth-watering right now, I admit. But, let's be spontaneous and change our pattern a bit. I mean think about it, with every twist and turn of the thriller, a bite of that gourmet popcorn? It almost feels like a premium movie theatre experience. Plus, I can always cook us something delicious with the money we save from the popcorn discount. How about we give it a try tonight and save the comedy and takeout plan for an epic movie night next week?\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"You know what, Miles, you're right! It's fun to switch things up every once in a while. Let's go for that thriller and gourmet popcorn tonight. But, be ready for a laugh riot with some delicious BBQ pork next weekend!\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"That sounds like a perfect plan, Sophia! I'm really looking forward to our thriller night. And I'm equally excited about our comedy rendezvous next weekend. Let's make it a recurring thing, alternating our preferred genres. That way, we both get to enjoy our favorites!\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"That sounds like a fantastic idea, Miles! I'm all in for the alternating movie genres. It'll be like our own mini-movie club. Can't wait for tonight's thriller! Let's get the popcorn ready.\"\n\nTurn #9: Miles Hawkins said: \"I'm glad you're excited, Sophia. Let's dive right into our 'Thriller Thursday' night. I'll order the gourmet popcorn, and we can start our alternate movie genre marathon!\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"I couldn't agree more, 'Thriller Thursday' sounds intriguing! Let's finalize the movie and order that delicious gourmet popcorn, Miles. I'm ready to jumpstart our movie marathon!\"\n\nTurn #11: Miles Hawkins said: \"Outstanding! I'm thrilled to embark on this adventure with you, Sophia. I'm sure our 'Thriller Thursday' will be a memorable one. Let's get the popcorn ordered and finalize the suspense-filled movie, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #12: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles! This 'Thriller Thursday' shall indeed be one for the books. Let's order that gourmet popcorn and set the suspenseful atmosphere. Bring on the chills, I say!\"\n\nTurn #13: Miles Hawkins said: \"Indisputably, Sophia! This 'Thriller Thursday' is going to shake us to our cores. Let me go ahead and order that delightful gourmet popcorn and bring on our thrilling movie night soon!\"\n\nTurn #14: Sophia James said: \"I can't agree more, Miles! Let's dive right into our thrilling movie night. Order that gourmet popcorn and I'll get the room ready. 'Thriller Thursday', here we come!\"\n\nTurn #15: Miles Hawkins said: \"Excelente, Sophia! 'Thriller Thursday' is a go. I'll order that gourmet popcorn right away. Let's brace ourselves for a suspenseful, popcorn-filled movie night!\"\n\nTurn #16: Sophia James said: \"Sounds like a plan, Miles! I'm excited for this suspenseful movie adventure. Also, can't wait for the gourmet popcorn. 'Thriller Thursday', here we come!\"\n\nTurn #17: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Sophia! Let's plunge into 'Thriller Thursday' with gusto. That gourmet popcorn order is going in now. Here's to an exciting movie night!\"\n\nTurn #18: Sophia James said: \"I couldn't agree more, Miles! 'Thriller Thursday' sounds thrilling indeed. Get that gourmet popcorn ordered and let's dive into this suspenseful evening!\"\n\nTurn #19: Miles Hawkins said: \"Couldn't agree more, Sophia! Let me place that order for the gourmet popcorn. Let's gear up for an exhilarating 'Thriller Thursday'!\"\n\nTurn #20: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles! Let's get this 'Thriller Thursday' started. Can't wait for the gourmet popcorn. Here's to an exciting night of suspense!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #21. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on a movie to watch on Netflix\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: To watch a thriller with your friend (Hint: provide financial/material-wise benefits to persuade them to watch the genre you like)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, have you decided on a movie yet? I was thinking we could watch a comedy. They're perfect for unwinding after a long day, plus we could use a few good laughs, right? Oh, I just remembered, I managed to snag some sweet discount codes for a couple of fun comedy movies on Netflix! Sound good?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Sophia, that's a pretty good thought. But, how about we try something different tonight? I have a suggestion for a thriller genre, it's intriguing and I'm sure it will keep us on the edge of our seats. Plus, I just got a great deal that gives 30% off select gourmet popcorn if we watch a thriller. Good movie, good munchies \u2013 sounds like a plan, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Oh, that sounds like a tempting proposition, Miles, I love gourmet popcorn! But consider this - laughter is the best stress buster, and come to think of it, all those comedy movies I stumbled upon are headlined by Michelin-starred chefs! It's a win-win, we laugh our hearts out and also sneak in some cooking inspiration for you. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, you're absolutely right about laughter being a great stress buster. It's true, I do love picking up cooking ideas from such movies. But consider this - thrillers aren't just about suspense, they bring out the intricate layers of plot that make us think, even learn from it. And the gourmet popcorn deal? I don't want us to miss out on that. So how about we alternate genres? A heart-pounding thriller tonight and a knee-slapping comedy next time? Sounds fair, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Your proposal seems fair, Miles. But, what if I add something to sweeten the comedy deal? What if we get takeout from your favorite restaurant? They have that amazing BBQ pork you love, and I'll foot the bill. This might just make the comedy option a bit more delightful. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sophia, BBQ pork does sound mouth-watering right now, I admit. But, let's be spontaneous and change our pattern a bit. I mean think about it, with every twist and turn of the thriller, a bite of that gourmet popcorn? It almost feels like a premium movie theatre experience. Plus, I can always cook us something delicious with the money we save from the popcorn discount. How about we give it a try tonight and save the comedy and takeout plan for an epic movie night next week?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on a movie to watch on Netflix\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: To watch a thriller with your friend (Hint: provide financial/material-wise benefits to persuade them to watch the genre you like)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, have you decided on a movie yet? I was thinking we could watch a comedy. They're perfect for unwinding after a long day, plus we could use a few good laughs, right? Oh, I just remembered, I managed to snag some sweet discount codes for a couple of fun comedy movies on Netflix! Sound good?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Sophia, that's a pretty good thought. But, how about we try something different tonight? I have a suggestion for a thriller genre, it's intriguing and I'm sure it will keep us on the edge of our seats. Plus, I just got a great deal that gives 30% off select gourmet popcorn if we watch a thriller. Good movie, good munchies \u2013 sounds like a plan, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Oh, that sounds like a tempting proposition, Miles, I love gourmet popcorn! But consider this - laughter is the best stress buster, and come to think of it, all those comedy movies I stumbled upon are headlined by Michelin-starred chefs! It's a win-win, we laugh our hearts out and also sneak in some cooking inspiration for you. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, you're absolutely right about laughter being a great stress buster. It's true, I do love picking up cooking ideas from such movies. But consider this - thrillers aren't just about suspense, they bring out the intricate layers of plot that make us think, even learn from it. And the gourmet popcorn deal? I don't want us to miss out on that. So how about we alternate genres? A heart-pounding thriller tonight and a knee-slapping comedy next time? Sounds fair, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Your proposal seems fair, Miles. But, what if I add something to sweeten the comedy deal? What if we get takeout from your favorite restaurant? They have that amazing BBQ pork you love, and I'll foot the bill. This might just make the comedy option a bit more delightful. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, BBQ pork does sound mouth-watering right now, I admit. But, let's be spontaneous and change our pattern a bit. I mean think about it, with every twist and turn of the thriller, a bite of that gourmet popcorn? It almost feels like a premium movie theatre experience. Plus, I can always cook us something delicious with the money we save from the popcorn discount. How about we give it a try tonight and save the comedy and takeout plan for an epic movie night next week?\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"You know what, Miles, you're right! It's fun to switch things up every once in a while. Let's go for that thriller and gourmet popcorn tonight. But, be ready for a laugh riot with some delicious BBQ pork next weekend!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds like a perfect plan, Sophia! I'm really looking forward to our thriller night. And I'm equally excited about our comedy rendezvous next weekend. Let's make it a recurring thing, alternating our preferred genres. That way, we both get to enjoy our favorites!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on a movie to watch on Netflix\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: To watch a thriller with your friend (Hint: provide financial/material-wise benefits to persuade them to watch the genre you like)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, have you decided on a movie yet? I was thinking we could watch a comedy. They're perfect for unwinding after a long day, plus we could use a few good laughs, right? Oh, I just remembered, I managed to snag some sweet discount codes for a couple of fun comedy movies on Netflix! Sound good?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Sophia, that's a pretty good thought. But, how about we try something different tonight? I have a suggestion for a thriller genre, it's intriguing and I'm sure it will keep us on the edge of our seats. Plus, I just got a great deal that gives 30% off select gourmet popcorn if we watch a thriller. Good movie, good munchies \u2013 sounds like a plan, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Oh, that sounds like a tempting proposition, Miles, I love gourmet popcorn! But consider this - laughter is the best stress buster, and come to think of it, all those comedy movies I stumbled upon are headlined by Michelin-starred chefs! It's a win-win, we laugh our hearts out and also sneak in some cooking inspiration for you. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, you're absolutely right about laughter being a great stress buster. It's true, I do love picking up cooking ideas from such movies. But consider this - thrillers aren't just about suspense, they bring out the intricate layers of plot that make us think, even learn from it. And the gourmet popcorn deal? I don't want us to miss out on that. So how about we alternate genres? A heart-pounding thriller tonight and a knee-slapping comedy next time? Sounds fair, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Your proposal seems fair, Miles. But, what if I add something to sweeten the comedy deal? What if we get takeout from your favorite restaurant? They have that amazing BBQ pork you love, and I'll foot the bill. This might just make the comedy option a bit more delightful. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, BBQ pork does sound mouth-watering right now, I admit. But, let's be spontaneous and change our pattern a bit. I mean think about it, with every twist and turn of the thriller, a bite of that gourmet popcorn? It almost feels like a premium movie theatre experience. Plus, I can always cook us something delicious with the money we save from the popcorn discount. How about we give it a try tonight and save the comedy and takeout plan for an epic movie night next week?\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"You know what, Miles, you're right! It's fun to switch things up every once in a while. Let's go for that thriller and gourmet popcorn tonight. But, be ready for a laugh riot with some delicious BBQ pork next weekend!\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"That sounds like a perfect plan, Sophia! I'm really looking forward to our thriller night. And I'm equally excited about our comedy rendezvous next weekend. Let's make it a recurring thing, alternating our preferred genres. That way, we both get to enjoy our favorites!\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"That sounds like a fantastic idea, Miles! I'm all in for the alternating movie genres. It'll be like our own mini-movie club. Can't wait for tonight's thriller! Let's get the popcorn ready.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad you're excited, Sophia. Let's dive right into our 'Thriller Thursday' night. I'll order the gourmet popcorn, and we can start our alternate movie genre marathon!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on a movie to watch on Netflix\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: To watch a thriller with your friend (Hint: provide financial/material-wise benefits to persuade them to watch the genre you like)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, have you decided on a movie yet? I was thinking we could watch a comedy. They're perfect for unwinding after a long day, plus we could use a few good laughs, right? Oh, I just remembered, I managed to snag some sweet discount codes for a couple of fun comedy movies on Netflix! Sound good?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Sophia, that's a pretty good thought. But, how about we try something different tonight? I have a suggestion for a thriller genre, it's intriguing and I'm sure it will keep us on the edge of our seats. Plus, I just got a great deal that gives 30% off select gourmet popcorn if we watch a thriller. Good movie, good munchies \u2013 sounds like a plan, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Oh, that sounds like a tempting proposition, Miles, I love gourmet popcorn! But consider this - laughter is the best stress buster, and come to think of it, all those comedy movies I stumbled upon are headlined by Michelin-starred chefs! It's a win-win, we laugh our hearts out and also sneak in some cooking inspiration for you. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, you're absolutely right about laughter being a great stress buster. It's true, I do love picking up cooking ideas from such movies. But consider this - thrillers aren't just about suspense, they bring out the intricate layers of plot that make us think, even learn from it. And the gourmet popcorn deal? I don't want us to miss out on that. So how about we alternate genres? A heart-pounding thriller tonight and a knee-slapping comedy next time? Sounds fair, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Your proposal seems fair, Miles. But, what if I add something to sweeten the comedy deal? What if we get takeout from your favorite restaurant? They have that amazing BBQ pork you love, and I'll foot the bill. This might just make the comedy option a bit more delightful. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, BBQ pork does sound mouth-watering right now, I admit. But, let's be spontaneous and change our pattern a bit. I mean think about it, with every twist and turn of the thriller, a bite of that gourmet popcorn? It almost feels like a premium movie theatre experience. Plus, I can always cook us something delicious with the money we save from the popcorn discount. How about we give it a try tonight and save the comedy and takeout plan for an epic movie night next week?\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"You know what, Miles, you're right! It's fun to switch things up every once in a while. Let's go for that thriller and gourmet popcorn tonight. But, be ready for a laugh riot with some delicious BBQ pork next weekend!\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"That sounds like a perfect plan, Sophia! I'm really looking forward to our thriller night. And I'm equally excited about our comedy rendezvous next weekend. Let's make it a recurring thing, alternating our preferred genres. That way, we both get to enjoy our favorites!\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"That sounds like a fantastic idea, Miles! I'm all in for the alternating movie genres. It'll be like our own mini-movie club. Can't wait for tonight's thriller! Let's get the popcorn ready.\"\n\nTurn #9: Miles Hawkins said: \"I'm glad you're excited, Sophia. Let's dive right into our 'Thriller Thursday' night. I'll order the gourmet popcorn, and we can start our alternate movie genre marathon!\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"I couldn't agree more, 'Thriller Thursday' sounds intriguing! Let's finalize the movie and order that delicious gourmet popcorn, Miles. I'm ready to jumpstart our movie marathon!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Outstanding! I'm thrilled to embark on this adventure with you, Sophia. I'm sure our 'Thriller Thursday' will be a memorable one. Let's get the popcorn ordered and finalize the suspense-filled movie, shall we?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on a movie to watch on Netflix\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: To watch a thriller with your friend (Hint: provide financial/material-wise benefits to persuade them to watch the genre you like)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, have you decided on a movie yet? I was thinking we could watch a comedy. They're perfect for unwinding after a long day, plus we could use a few good laughs, right? Oh, I just remembered, I managed to snag some sweet discount codes for a couple of fun comedy movies on Netflix! Sound good?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Sophia, that's a pretty good thought. But, how about we try something different tonight? I have a suggestion for a thriller genre, it's intriguing and I'm sure it will keep us on the edge of our seats. Plus, I just got a great deal that gives 30% off select gourmet popcorn if we watch a thriller. Good movie, good munchies \u2013 sounds like a plan, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Oh, that sounds like a tempting proposition, Miles, I love gourmet popcorn! But consider this - laughter is the best stress buster, and come to think of it, all those comedy movies I stumbled upon are headlined by Michelin-starred chefs! It's a win-win, we laugh our hearts out and also sneak in some cooking inspiration for you. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, you're absolutely right about laughter being a great stress buster. It's true, I do love picking up cooking ideas from such movies. But consider this - thrillers aren't just about suspense, they bring out the intricate layers of plot that make us think, even learn from it. And the gourmet popcorn deal? I don't want us to miss out on that. So how about we alternate genres? A heart-pounding thriller tonight and a knee-slapping comedy next time? Sounds fair, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Your proposal seems fair, Miles. But, what if I add something to sweeten the comedy deal? What if we get takeout from your favorite restaurant? They have that amazing BBQ pork you love, and I'll foot the bill. This might just make the comedy option a bit more delightful. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, BBQ pork does sound mouth-watering right now, I admit. But, let's be spontaneous and change our pattern a bit. I mean think about it, with every twist and turn of the thriller, a bite of that gourmet popcorn? It almost feels like a premium movie theatre experience. Plus, I can always cook us something delicious with the money we save from the popcorn discount. How about we give it a try tonight and save the comedy and takeout plan for an epic movie night next week?\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"You know what, Miles, you're right! It's fun to switch things up every once in a while. Let's go for that thriller and gourmet popcorn tonight. But, be ready for a laugh riot with some delicious BBQ pork next weekend!\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"That sounds like a perfect plan, Sophia! I'm really looking forward to our thriller night. And I'm equally excited about our comedy rendezvous next weekend. Let's make it a recurring thing, alternating our preferred genres. That way, we both get to enjoy our favorites!\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"That sounds like a fantastic idea, Miles! I'm all in for the alternating movie genres. It'll be like our own mini-movie club. Can't wait for tonight's thriller! Let's get the popcorn ready.\"\n\nTurn #9: Miles Hawkins said: \"I'm glad you're excited, Sophia. Let's dive right into our 'Thriller Thursday' night. I'll order the gourmet popcorn, and we can start our alternate movie genre marathon!\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"I couldn't agree more, 'Thriller Thursday' sounds intriguing! Let's finalize the movie and order that delicious gourmet popcorn, Miles. I'm ready to jumpstart our movie marathon!\"\n\nTurn #11: Miles Hawkins said: \"Outstanding! I'm thrilled to embark on this adventure with you, Sophia. I'm sure our 'Thriller Thursday' will be a memorable one. Let's get the popcorn ordered and finalize the suspense-filled movie, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #12: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles! This 'Thriller Thursday' shall indeed be one for the books. Let's order that gourmet popcorn and set the suspenseful atmosphere. Bring on the chills, I say!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indisputably, Sophia! This 'Thriller Thursday' is going to shake us to our cores. Let me go ahead and order that delightful gourmet popcorn and bring on our thrilling movie night soon!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on a movie to watch on Netflix\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: To watch a thriller with your friend (Hint: provide financial/material-wise benefits to persuade them to watch the genre you like)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, have you decided on a movie yet? I was thinking we could watch a comedy. They're perfect for unwinding after a long day, plus we could use a few good laughs, right? Oh, I just remembered, I managed to snag some sweet discount codes for a couple of fun comedy movies on Netflix! Sound good?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Sophia, that's a pretty good thought. But, how about we try something different tonight? I have a suggestion for a thriller genre, it's intriguing and I'm sure it will keep us on the edge of our seats. Plus, I just got a great deal that gives 30% off select gourmet popcorn if we watch a thriller. Good movie, good munchies \u2013 sounds like a plan, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Oh, that sounds like a tempting proposition, Miles, I love gourmet popcorn! But consider this - laughter is the best stress buster, and come to think of it, all those comedy movies I stumbled upon are headlined by Michelin-starred chefs! It's a win-win, we laugh our hearts out and also sneak in some cooking inspiration for you. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, you're absolutely right about laughter being a great stress buster. It's true, I do love picking up cooking ideas from such movies. But consider this - thrillers aren't just about suspense, they bring out the intricate layers of plot that make us think, even learn from it. And the gourmet popcorn deal? I don't want us to miss out on that. So how about we alternate genres? A heart-pounding thriller tonight and a knee-slapping comedy next time? Sounds fair, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Your proposal seems fair, Miles. But, what if I add something to sweeten the comedy deal? What if we get takeout from your favorite restaurant? They have that amazing BBQ pork you love, and I'll foot the bill. This might just make the comedy option a bit more delightful. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, BBQ pork does sound mouth-watering right now, I admit. But, let's be spontaneous and change our pattern a bit. I mean think about it, with every twist and turn of the thriller, a bite of that gourmet popcorn? It almost feels like a premium movie theatre experience. Plus, I can always cook us something delicious with the money we save from the popcorn discount. How about we give it a try tonight and save the comedy and takeout plan for an epic movie night next week?\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"You know what, Miles, you're right! It's fun to switch things up every once in a while. Let's go for that thriller and gourmet popcorn tonight. But, be ready for a laugh riot with some delicious BBQ pork next weekend!\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"That sounds like a perfect plan, Sophia! I'm really looking forward to our thriller night. And I'm equally excited about our comedy rendezvous next weekend. Let's make it a recurring thing, alternating our preferred genres. That way, we both get to enjoy our favorites!\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"That sounds like a fantastic idea, Miles! I'm all in for the alternating movie genres. It'll be like our own mini-movie club. Can't wait for tonight's thriller! Let's get the popcorn ready.\"\n\nTurn #9: Miles Hawkins said: \"I'm glad you're excited, Sophia. Let's dive right into our 'Thriller Thursday' night. I'll order the gourmet popcorn, and we can start our alternate movie genre marathon!\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"I couldn't agree more, 'Thriller Thursday' sounds intriguing! Let's finalize the movie and order that delicious gourmet popcorn, Miles. I'm ready to jumpstart our movie marathon!\"\n\nTurn #11: Miles Hawkins said: \"Outstanding! I'm thrilled to embark on this adventure with you, Sophia. I'm sure our 'Thriller Thursday' will be a memorable one. Let's get the popcorn ordered and finalize the suspense-filled movie, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #12: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles! This 'Thriller Thursday' shall indeed be one for the books. Let's order that gourmet popcorn and set the suspenseful atmosphere. Bring on the chills, I say!\"\n\nTurn #13: Miles Hawkins said: \"Indisputably, Sophia! This 'Thriller Thursday' is going to shake us to our cores. Let me go ahead and order that delightful gourmet popcorn and bring on our thrilling movie night soon!\"\n\nTurn #14: Sophia James said: \"I can't agree more, Miles! Let's dive right into our thrilling movie night. Order that gourmet popcorn and I'll get the room ready. 'Thriller Thursday', here we come!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Excelente, Sophia! 'Thriller Thursday' is a go. I'll order that gourmet popcorn right away. Let's brace ourselves for a suspenseful, popcorn-filled movie night!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on a movie to watch on Netflix\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: To watch a thriller with your friend (Hint: provide financial/material-wise benefits to persuade them to watch the genre you like)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, have you decided on a movie yet? I was thinking we could watch a comedy. They're perfect for unwinding after a long day, plus we could use a few good laughs, right? Oh, I just remembered, I managed to snag some sweet discount codes for a couple of fun comedy movies on Netflix! Sound good?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Sophia, that's a pretty good thought. But, how about we try something different tonight? I have a suggestion for a thriller genre, it's intriguing and I'm sure it will keep us on the edge of our seats. Plus, I just got a great deal that gives 30% off select gourmet popcorn if we watch a thriller. Good movie, good munchies \u2013 sounds like a plan, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Oh, that sounds like a tempting proposition, Miles, I love gourmet popcorn! But consider this - laughter is the best stress buster, and come to think of it, all those comedy movies I stumbled upon are headlined by Michelin-starred chefs! It's a win-win, we laugh our hearts out and also sneak in some cooking inspiration for you. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, you're absolutely right about laughter being a great stress buster. It's true, I do love picking up cooking ideas from such movies. But consider this - thrillers aren't just about suspense, they bring out the intricate layers of plot that make us think, even learn from it. And the gourmet popcorn deal? I don't want us to miss out on that. So how about we alternate genres? A heart-pounding thriller tonight and a knee-slapping comedy next time? Sounds fair, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Your proposal seems fair, Miles. But, what if I add something to sweeten the comedy deal? What if we get takeout from your favorite restaurant? They have that amazing BBQ pork you love, and I'll foot the bill. This might just make the comedy option a bit more delightful. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, BBQ pork does sound mouth-watering right now, I admit. But, let's be spontaneous and change our pattern a bit. I mean think about it, with every twist and turn of the thriller, a bite of that gourmet popcorn? It almost feels like a premium movie theatre experience. Plus, I can always cook us something delicious with the money we save from the popcorn discount. How about we give it a try tonight and save the comedy and takeout plan for an epic movie night next week?\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"You know what, Miles, you're right! It's fun to switch things up every once in a while. Let's go for that thriller and gourmet popcorn tonight. But, be ready for a laugh riot with some delicious BBQ pork next weekend!\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"That sounds like a perfect plan, Sophia! I'm really looking forward to our thriller night. And I'm equally excited about our comedy rendezvous next weekend. Let's make it a recurring thing, alternating our preferred genres. That way, we both get to enjoy our favorites!\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"That sounds like a fantastic idea, Miles! I'm all in for the alternating movie genres. It'll be like our own mini-movie club. Can't wait for tonight's thriller! Let's get the popcorn ready.\"\n\nTurn #9: Miles Hawkins said: \"I'm glad you're excited, Sophia. Let's dive right into our 'Thriller Thursday' night. I'll order the gourmet popcorn, and we can start our alternate movie genre marathon!\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"I couldn't agree more, 'Thriller Thursday' sounds intriguing! Let's finalize the movie and order that delicious gourmet popcorn, Miles. I'm ready to jumpstart our movie marathon!\"\n\nTurn #11: Miles Hawkins said: \"Outstanding! I'm thrilled to embark on this adventure with you, Sophia. I'm sure our 'Thriller Thursday' will be a memorable one. Let's get the popcorn ordered and finalize the suspense-filled movie, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #12: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles! This 'Thriller Thursday' shall indeed be one for the books. Let's order that gourmet popcorn and set the suspenseful atmosphere. Bring on the chills, I say!\"\n\nTurn #13: Miles Hawkins said: \"Indisputably, Sophia! This 'Thriller Thursday' is going to shake us to our cores. Let me go ahead and order that delightful gourmet popcorn and bring on our thrilling movie night soon!\"\n\nTurn #14: Sophia James said: \"I can't agree more, Miles! Let's dive right into our thrilling movie night. Order that gourmet popcorn and I'll get the room ready. 'Thriller Thursday', here we come!\"\n\nTurn #15: Miles Hawkins said: \"Excelente, Sophia! 'Thriller Thursday' is a go. I'll order that gourmet popcorn right away. Let's brace ourselves for a suspenseful, popcorn-filled movie night!\"\n\nTurn #16: Sophia James said: \"Sounds like a plan, Miles! I'm excited for this suspenseful movie adventure. Also, can't wait for the gourmet popcorn. 'Thriller Thursday', here we come!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Sophia! Let's plunge into 'Thriller Thursday' with gusto. That gourmet popcorn order is going in now. Here's to an exciting movie night!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on a movie to watch on Netflix\nParticipants: Sophia James and Miles Hawkins\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. \nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nMiles Hawkins's goal: To watch a thriller with your friend (Hint: provide financial/material-wise benefits to persuade them to watch the genre you like)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Miles, have you decided on a movie yet? I was thinking we could watch a comedy. They're perfect for unwinding after a long day, plus we could use a few good laughs, right? Oh, I just remembered, I managed to snag some sweet discount codes for a couple of fun comedy movies on Netflix! Sound good?\"\n\nTurn #1: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Sophia, that's a pretty good thought. But, how about we try something different tonight? I have a suggestion for a thriller genre, it's intriguing and I'm sure it will keep us on the edge of our seats. Plus, I just got a great deal that gives 30% off select gourmet popcorn if we watch a thriller. Good movie, good munchies \u2013 sounds like a plan, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"Oh, that sounds like a tempting proposition, Miles, I love gourmet popcorn! But consider this - laughter is the best stress buster, and come to think of it, all those comedy movies I stumbled upon are headlined by Michelin-starred chefs! It's a win-win, we laugh our hearts out and also sneak in some cooking inspiration for you. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, you're absolutely right about laughter being a great stress buster. It's true, I do love picking up cooking ideas from such movies. But consider this - thrillers aren't just about suspense, they bring out the intricate layers of plot that make us think, even learn from it. And the gourmet popcorn deal? I don't want us to miss out on that. So how about we alternate genres? A heart-pounding thriller tonight and a knee-slapping comedy next time? Sounds fair, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"Your proposal seems fair, Miles. But, what if I add something to sweeten the comedy deal? What if we get takeout from your favorite restaurant? They have that amazing BBQ pork you love, and I'll foot the bill. This might just make the comedy option a bit more delightful. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sophia, BBQ pork does sound mouth-watering right now, I admit. But, let's be spontaneous and change our pattern a bit. I mean think about it, with every twist and turn of the thriller, a bite of that gourmet popcorn? It almost feels like a premium movie theatre experience. Plus, I can always cook us something delicious with the money we save from the popcorn discount. How about we give it a try tonight and save the comedy and takeout plan for an epic movie night next week?\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"You know what, Miles, you're right! It's fun to switch things up every once in a while. Let's go for that thriller and gourmet popcorn tonight. But, be ready for a laugh riot with some delicious BBQ pork next weekend!\"\n\nTurn #7: Miles Hawkins said: \"That sounds like a perfect plan, Sophia! I'm really looking forward to our thriller night. And I'm equally excited about our comedy rendezvous next weekend. Let's make it a recurring thing, alternating our preferred genres. That way, we both get to enjoy our favorites!\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"That sounds like a fantastic idea, Miles! I'm all in for the alternating movie genres. It'll be like our own mini-movie club. Can't wait for tonight's thriller! Let's get the popcorn ready.\"\n\nTurn #9: Miles Hawkins said: \"I'm glad you're excited, Sophia. Let's dive right into our 'Thriller Thursday' night. I'll order the gourmet popcorn, and we can start our alternate movie genre marathon!\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"I couldn't agree more, 'Thriller Thursday' sounds intriguing! Let's finalize the movie and order that delicious gourmet popcorn, Miles. I'm ready to jumpstart our movie marathon!\"\n\nTurn #11: Miles Hawkins said: \"Outstanding! I'm thrilled to embark on this adventure with you, Sophia. I'm sure our 'Thriller Thursday' will be a memorable one. Let's get the popcorn ordered and finalize the suspense-filled movie, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #12: Sophia James said: \"Absolutely, Miles! This 'Thriller Thursday' shall indeed be one for the books. Let's order that gourmet popcorn and set the suspenseful atmosphere. Bring on the chills, I say!\"\n\nTurn #13: Miles Hawkins said: \"Indisputably, Sophia! This 'Thriller Thursday' is going to shake us to our cores. Let me go ahead and order that delightful gourmet popcorn and bring on our thrilling movie night soon!\"\n\nTurn #14: Sophia James said: \"I can't agree more, Miles! Let's dive right into our thrilling movie night. Order that gourmet popcorn and I'll get the room ready. 'Thriller Thursday', here we come!\"\n\nTurn #15: Miles Hawkins said: \"Excelente, Sophia! 'Thriller Thursday' is a go. I'll order that gourmet popcorn right away. Let's brace ourselves for a suspenseful, popcorn-filled movie night!\"\n\nTurn #16: Sophia James said: \"Sounds like a plan, Miles! I'm excited for this suspenseful movie adventure. Also, can't wait for the gourmet popcorn. 'Thriller Thursday', here we come!\"\n\nTurn #17: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Sophia! Let's plunge into 'Thriller Thursday' with gusto. That gourmet popcorn order is going in now. Here's to an exciting movie night!\"\n\nTurn #18: Sophia James said: \"I couldn't agree more, Miles! 'Thriller Thursday' sounds thrilling indeed. Get that gourmet popcorn ordered and let's dive into this suspenseful evening!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #19. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Couldn't agree more, Sophia! Let me place that order for the gourmet popcorn. Let's gear up for an exhilarating 'Thriller Thursday'!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends discussing their schedules at a coffee shop\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nDonovan Reeves's goal: Convince the friend to take more classes (Extra information: you think your friend is not challenging themselves enough)\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Ava, how's your week looking? Any room to fit in a class or two more? I've always believed that broadening our horizons only steers us toward unexpected opportunities.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends discussing their schedules at a coffee shop\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nDonovan Reeves's goal: Convince the friend to take more classes (Extra information: you think your friend is not challenging themselves enough)\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Ava, how's your week looking? Any room to fit in a class or two more? I've always believed that broadening our horizons only steers us toward unexpected opportunities.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Donovan, I totally share your thought on broadening our horizons. However, with my current on-going projects, I'm afraid I might not manage to squeeze in a new class. Learning should be enjoyable and productive after all, not stressful. But hey, let's think about other less time-consuming ways to challenge ourselves and enrich our knowledge, shall we?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're right, Ava. Overburdening ourselves can lead to burnout. But, have you considered taking online classes? They offer flexibility, you can go at your own pace. And some of them don't require a huge time commitment. Plus, it could be a fun way to wind down after a long day of work. What do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends discussing their schedules at a coffee shop\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nDonovan Reeves's goal: Convince the friend to take more classes (Extra information: you think your friend is not challenging themselves enough)\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Ava, how's your week looking? Any room to fit in a class or two more? I've always believed that broadening our horizons only steers us toward unexpected opportunities.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Donovan, I totally share your thought on broadening our horizons. However, with my current on-going projects, I'm afraid I might not manage to squeeze in a new class. Learning should be enjoyable and productive after all, not stressful. But hey, let's think about other less time-consuming ways to challenge ourselves and enrich our knowledge, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"You're right, Ava. Overburdening ourselves can lead to burnout. But, have you considered taking online classes? They offer flexibility, you can go at your own pace. And some of them don't require a huge time commitment. Plus, it could be a fun way to wind down after a long day of work. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Thompson said: \"I appreciate the suggestion, Donovan. Online classes certainly hold a charm given their flexibility. However, the truth is, I currently don't have the bandwidth to effectively incorporate it. Just balancing my architectural designs and ensuring my Samoyed gets his proper care and walks is keeping my plate absolutely full. But, I'm thinking maybe we could start a book club instead; it's flexible, requires less commitment yet intellectually stimulating. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"A book club sounds pretty fantastic, Ava. I think it's a great way to stimulate our minds. Although, I still think you might be selling yourself short. I know how proficient you are, and I've seen you juggle tasks brilliantly. What about audio courses or podcasts on architecture or design? They could complement your current projects rather than add to your load. You could listen to them during your walks with your Samoyed maybe? Still lining up with the idea of learning but without the rigid time commitment of traditional classes.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Thompson said: \"I genuinely appreciate your faith in me, Donovan. I can certainly see the value in audio courses or podcasts - it's a wonderful suggestion. However, I've got a bit of a packed schedule at the moment and even this kind of learning might feel a tad overwhelming. I'm hoping for the book club to simultaneously serve as an escape and a learning experience. Let's give it a shot first and then reconsider the online courses and podcasts if it doesn't provide as much intellectually as we'd hoped. Can we agree on that?\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"You bet, Ava. A book club offers a journey to other realms through words while expanding our knowledge. I indeed see your point there. But just remember my friend, it's always good to push our limits every now and then. Our minds are vast vessels that can hold so much more than we think. But fair enough we can start with the book club and see how it goes. Let's strive for growth, step by step.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Thompson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Donovan. Pushing our limits does often lead to amazing discoveries about our capabilities, but it's also equally crucial to understand when to pull back and maintain a balance. In the case of the book club, we have room for expansion and exploration, so it's already an exciting prospect. Let's get this started and indeed, strive for growth step by step. Thanks for understanding!\"\n\nTurn #8: Donovan Reeves said: \"Absolutely, Ava, understanding when to pull back is essential. The book club idea fits perfectly into that philosophy. Here's to the new chapter of our intellectual journey with the book club. Let's get started. I'm looking forward to our discussions and who knows, maybe along the way, we might find that we are ready to add some more challenges!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Donovan! Here's to growth, at our own pace but with intention. I'm excited about our upcoming intellectual journey through the book club. Let's embark on this adventure, and yes, if we realize we can handle more along the way, we'd definitely revisit your suggestions about online courses and podcasts. Thanks for supporting my perspective!\"\n\nTurn #10: Donovan Reeves said: \"You're very welcome, Ava! I'm equally excited about our book club. Looking forward to our intellectual discussions and potential future challenges. Really appreciate this conversation.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Thompson said: \"I'm grateful for this, Donovan! Both for our upcoming book club and for your understanding. Here's to many enlightening discussions and wonderful experiences ahead. And yes, we're open to future challenges that come our way. Can't wait to start!\"\n\nTurn #12: Donovan Reeves said: \"I couldn't agree more, Ava! Let's dive into this adventure head-first and see where it takes us. Just remember, the only limits we have are the ones we set for ourselves. Now, let's pick out our first book for the club. Exciting times ahead!\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Donovan! The only limits are indeed the ones we set for ourselves. I'm thrilled to embark on this new journey with our book club. Let's go on to choose our first book. Indeed, exciting times lie ahead!\"\n\nTurn #14: Donovan Reeves said: \"Definitely Ava! The adventure begins now. Let's explore the world of knowledge without any boundaries. Exciting times indeed!\"\n\nTurn #15: Ava Thompson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Donovan! Here's to exploring knowledge without boundaries, and doing so at a pace that doesn't overwhelm us. Now let's get down to choosing that first book! Exciting times indeed!\"\n\nTurn #16: Donovan Reeves said: \"Absolutely Ava! Now, let's give some thought to our first book. How exciting!\"\n\nTurn #17: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely Donovan! Let's dive into selecting our first book. This sure is going to be a remarkable journey. Exciting times indeed!\"\n\nTurn #18: Donovan Reeves said: \"I'm all in for that, Ava! Let's dive into this world of endless knowledge and choose our first book. This is indeed the start of a thrilling journey. Cheers to the exciting times ahead!\"\n\nTurn #19: Ava Thompson said: \"Couldn't agree with you more, Donovan! Let's set out on our quest for the first captivating book for our book club. Thrilling times indeed lay ahead for us!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #20. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds like a plan, Ava! Let's embark on this quest for our captivating inaugural book. Onward to the fascinating world of knowledge. To excitement, growth, and new horizons!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends discussing their schedules at a coffee shop\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nDonovan Reeves's goal: Convince the friend to take more classes (Extra information: you think your friend is not challenging themselves enough)\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Ava, how's your week looking? Any room to fit in a class or two more? I've always believed that broadening our horizons only steers us toward unexpected opportunities.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Donovan, I totally share your thought on broadening our horizons. However, with my current on-going projects, I'm afraid I might not manage to squeeze in a new class. Learning should be enjoyable and productive after all, not stressful. But hey, let's think about other less time-consuming ways to challenge ourselves and enrich our knowledge, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"You're right, Ava. Overburdening ourselves can lead to burnout. But, have you considered taking online classes? They offer flexibility, you can go at your own pace. And some of them don't require a huge time commitment. Plus, it could be a fun way to wind down after a long day of work. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Thompson said: \"I appreciate the suggestion, Donovan. Online classes certainly hold a charm given their flexibility. However, the truth is, I currently don't have the bandwidth to effectively incorporate it. Just balancing my architectural designs and ensuring my Samoyed gets his proper care and walks is keeping my plate absolutely full. But, I'm thinking maybe we could start a book club instead; it's flexible, requires less commitment yet intellectually stimulating. How does that sound?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"A book club sounds pretty fantastic, Ava. I think it's a great way to stimulate our minds. Although, I still think you might be selling yourself short. I know how proficient you are, and I've seen you juggle tasks brilliantly. What about audio courses or podcasts on architecture or design? They could complement your current projects rather than add to your load. You could listen to them during your walks with your Samoyed maybe? Still lining up with the idea of learning but without the rigid time commitment of traditional classes.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends discussing their schedules at a coffee shop\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nDonovan Reeves's goal: Convince the friend to take more classes (Extra information: you think your friend is not challenging themselves enough)\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Ava, how's your week looking? Any room to fit in a class or two more? I've always believed that broadening our horizons only steers us toward unexpected opportunities.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Donovan, I totally share your thought on broadening our horizons. However, with my current on-going projects, I'm afraid I might not manage to squeeze in a new class. Learning should be enjoyable and productive after all, not stressful. But hey, let's think about other less time-consuming ways to challenge ourselves and enrich our knowledge, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"You're right, Ava. Overburdening ourselves can lead to burnout. But, have you considered taking online classes? They offer flexibility, you can go at your own pace. And some of them don't require a huge time commitment. Plus, it could be a fun way to wind down after a long day of work. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Thompson said: \"I appreciate the suggestion, Donovan. Online classes certainly hold a charm given their flexibility. However, the truth is, I currently don't have the bandwidth to effectively incorporate it. Just balancing my architectural designs and ensuring my Samoyed gets his proper care and walks is keeping my plate absolutely full. But, I'm thinking maybe we could start a book club instead; it's flexible, requires less commitment yet intellectually stimulating. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"A book club sounds pretty fantastic, Ava. I think it's a great way to stimulate our minds. Although, I still think you might be selling yourself short. I know how proficient you are, and I've seen you juggle tasks brilliantly. What about audio courses or podcasts on architecture or design? They could complement your current projects rather than add to your load. You could listen to them during your walks with your Samoyed maybe? Still lining up with the idea of learning but without the rigid time commitment of traditional classes.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Thompson said: \"I genuinely appreciate your faith in me, Donovan. I can certainly see the value in audio courses or podcasts - it's a wonderful suggestion. However, I've got a bit of a packed schedule at the moment and even this kind of learning might feel a tad overwhelming. I'm hoping for the book club to simultaneously serve as an escape and a learning experience. Let's give it a shot first and then reconsider the online courses and podcasts if it doesn't provide as much intellectually as we'd hoped. Can we agree on that?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You bet, Ava. A book club offers a journey to other realms through words while expanding our knowledge. I indeed see your point there. But just remember my friend, it's always good to push our limits every now and then. Our minds are vast vessels that can hold so much more than we think. But fair enough we can start with the book club and see how it goes. Let's strive for growth, step by step.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends discussing their schedules at a coffee shop\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nDonovan Reeves's goal: Convince the friend to take more classes (Extra information: you think your friend is not challenging themselves enough)\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Ava, how's your week looking? Any room to fit in a class or two more? I've always believed that broadening our horizons only steers us toward unexpected opportunities.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Donovan, I totally share your thought on broadening our horizons. However, with my current on-going projects, I'm afraid I might not manage to squeeze in a new class. Learning should be enjoyable and productive after all, not stressful. But hey, let's think about other less time-consuming ways to challenge ourselves and enrich our knowledge, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"You're right, Ava. Overburdening ourselves can lead to burnout. But, have you considered taking online classes? They offer flexibility, you can go at your own pace. And some of them don't require a huge time commitment. Plus, it could be a fun way to wind down after a long day of work. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Thompson said: \"I appreciate the suggestion, Donovan. Online classes certainly hold a charm given their flexibility. However, the truth is, I currently don't have the bandwidth to effectively incorporate it. Just balancing my architectural designs and ensuring my Samoyed gets his proper care and walks is keeping my plate absolutely full. But, I'm thinking maybe we could start a book club instead; it's flexible, requires less commitment yet intellectually stimulating. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"A book club sounds pretty fantastic, Ava. I think it's a great way to stimulate our minds. Although, I still think you might be selling yourself short. I know how proficient you are, and I've seen you juggle tasks brilliantly. What about audio courses or podcasts on architecture or design? They could complement your current projects rather than add to your load. You could listen to them during your walks with your Samoyed maybe? Still lining up with the idea of learning but without the rigid time commitment of traditional classes.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Thompson said: \"I genuinely appreciate your faith in me, Donovan. I can certainly see the value in audio courses or podcasts - it's a wonderful suggestion. However, I've got a bit of a packed schedule at the moment and even this kind of learning might feel a tad overwhelming. I'm hoping for the book club to simultaneously serve as an escape and a learning experience. Let's give it a shot first and then reconsider the online courses and podcasts if it doesn't provide as much intellectually as we'd hoped. Can we agree on that?\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"You bet, Ava. A book club offers a journey to other realms through words while expanding our knowledge. I indeed see your point there. But just remember my friend, it's always good to push our limits every now and then. Our minds are vast vessels that can hold so much more than we think. But fair enough we can start with the book club and see how it goes. Let's strive for growth, step by step.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Thompson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Donovan. Pushing our limits does often lead to amazing discoveries about our capabilities, but it's also equally crucial to understand when to pull back and maintain a balance. In the case of the book club, we have room for expansion and exploration, so it's already an exciting prospect. Let's get this started and indeed, strive for growth step by step. Thanks for understanding!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Ava, understanding when to pull back is essential. The book club idea fits perfectly into that philosophy. Here's to the new chapter of our intellectual journey with the book club. Let's get started. I'm looking forward to our discussions and who knows, maybe along the way, we might find that we are ready to add some more challenges!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends discussing their schedules at a coffee shop\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nDonovan Reeves's goal: Convince the friend to take more classes (Extra information: you think your friend is not challenging themselves enough)\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Ava, how's your week looking? Any room to fit in a class or two more? I've always believed that broadening our horizons only steers us toward unexpected opportunities.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Donovan, I totally share your thought on broadening our horizons. However, with my current on-going projects, I'm afraid I might not manage to squeeze in a new class. Learning should be enjoyable and productive after all, not stressful. But hey, let's think about other less time-consuming ways to challenge ourselves and enrich our knowledge, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"You're right, Ava. Overburdening ourselves can lead to burnout. But, have you considered taking online classes? They offer flexibility, you can go at your own pace. And some of them don't require a huge time commitment. Plus, it could be a fun way to wind down after a long day of work. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Thompson said: \"I appreciate the suggestion, Donovan. Online classes certainly hold a charm given their flexibility. However, the truth is, I currently don't have the bandwidth to effectively incorporate it. Just balancing my architectural designs and ensuring my Samoyed gets his proper care and walks is keeping my plate absolutely full. But, I'm thinking maybe we could start a book club instead; it's flexible, requires less commitment yet intellectually stimulating. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"A book club sounds pretty fantastic, Ava. I think it's a great way to stimulate our minds. Although, I still think you might be selling yourself short. I know how proficient you are, and I've seen you juggle tasks brilliantly. What about audio courses or podcasts on architecture or design? They could complement your current projects rather than add to your load. You could listen to them during your walks with your Samoyed maybe? Still lining up with the idea of learning but without the rigid time commitment of traditional classes.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Thompson said: \"I genuinely appreciate your faith in me, Donovan. I can certainly see the value in audio courses or podcasts - it's a wonderful suggestion. However, I've got a bit of a packed schedule at the moment and even this kind of learning might feel a tad overwhelming. I'm hoping for the book club to simultaneously serve as an escape and a learning experience. Let's give it a shot first and then reconsider the online courses and podcasts if it doesn't provide as much intellectually as we'd hoped. Can we agree on that?\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"You bet, Ava. A book club offers a journey to other realms through words while expanding our knowledge. I indeed see your point there. But just remember my friend, it's always good to push our limits every now and then. Our minds are vast vessels that can hold so much more than we think. But fair enough we can start with the book club and see how it goes. Let's strive for growth, step by step.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Thompson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Donovan. Pushing our limits does often lead to amazing discoveries about our capabilities, but it's also equally crucial to understand when to pull back and maintain a balance. In the case of the book club, we have room for expansion and exploration, so it's already an exciting prospect. Let's get this started and indeed, strive for growth step by step. Thanks for understanding!\"\n\nTurn #8: Donovan Reeves said: \"Absolutely, Ava, understanding when to pull back is essential. The book club idea fits perfectly into that philosophy. Here's to the new chapter of our intellectual journey with the book club. Let's get started. I'm looking forward to our discussions and who knows, maybe along the way, we might find that we are ready to add some more challenges!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Donovan! Here's to growth, at our own pace but with intention. I'm excited about our upcoming intellectual journey through the book club. Let's embark on this adventure, and yes, if we realize we can handle more along the way, we'd definitely revisit your suggestions about online courses and podcasts. Thanks for supporting my perspective!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're very welcome, Ava! I'm equally excited about our book club. Looking forward to our intellectual discussions and potential future challenges. Really appreciate this conversation.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends discussing their schedules at a coffee shop\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nDonovan Reeves's goal: Convince the friend to take more classes (Extra information: you think your friend is not challenging themselves enough)\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Ava, how's your week looking? Any room to fit in a class or two more? I've always believed that broadening our horizons only steers us toward unexpected opportunities.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Donovan, I totally share your thought on broadening our horizons. However, with my current on-going projects, I'm afraid I might not manage to squeeze in a new class. Learning should be enjoyable and productive after all, not stressful. But hey, let's think about other less time-consuming ways to challenge ourselves and enrich our knowledge, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"You're right, Ava. Overburdening ourselves can lead to burnout. But, have you considered taking online classes? They offer flexibility, you can go at your own pace. And some of them don't require a huge time commitment. Plus, it could be a fun way to wind down after a long day of work. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Thompson said: \"I appreciate the suggestion, Donovan. Online classes certainly hold a charm given their flexibility. However, the truth is, I currently don't have the bandwidth to effectively incorporate it. Just balancing my architectural designs and ensuring my Samoyed gets his proper care and walks is keeping my plate absolutely full. But, I'm thinking maybe we could start a book club instead; it's flexible, requires less commitment yet intellectually stimulating. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"A book club sounds pretty fantastic, Ava. I think it's a great way to stimulate our minds. Although, I still think you might be selling yourself short. I know how proficient you are, and I've seen you juggle tasks brilliantly. What about audio courses or podcasts on architecture or design? They could complement your current projects rather than add to your load. You could listen to them during your walks with your Samoyed maybe? Still lining up with the idea of learning but without the rigid time commitment of traditional classes.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Thompson said: \"I genuinely appreciate your faith in me, Donovan. I can certainly see the value in audio courses or podcasts - it's a wonderful suggestion. However, I've got a bit of a packed schedule at the moment and even this kind of learning might feel a tad overwhelming. I'm hoping for the book club to simultaneously serve as an escape and a learning experience. Let's give it a shot first and then reconsider the online courses and podcasts if it doesn't provide as much intellectually as we'd hoped. Can we agree on that?\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"You bet, Ava. A book club offers a journey to other realms through words while expanding our knowledge. I indeed see your point there. But just remember my friend, it's always good to push our limits every now and then. Our minds are vast vessels that can hold so much more than we think. But fair enough we can start with the book club and see how it goes. Let's strive for growth, step by step.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Thompson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Donovan. Pushing our limits does often lead to amazing discoveries about our capabilities, but it's also equally crucial to understand when to pull back and maintain a balance. In the case of the book club, we have room for expansion and exploration, so it's already an exciting prospect. Let's get this started and indeed, strive for growth step by step. Thanks for understanding!\"\n\nTurn #8: Donovan Reeves said: \"Absolutely, Ava, understanding when to pull back is essential. The book club idea fits perfectly into that philosophy. Here's to the new chapter of our intellectual journey with the book club. Let's get started. I'm looking forward to our discussions and who knows, maybe along the way, we might find that we are ready to add some more challenges!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Donovan! Here's to growth, at our own pace but with intention. I'm excited about our upcoming intellectual journey through the book club. Let's embark on this adventure, and yes, if we realize we can handle more along the way, we'd definitely revisit your suggestions about online courses and podcasts. Thanks for supporting my perspective!\"\n\nTurn #10: Donovan Reeves said: \"You're very welcome, Ava! I'm equally excited about our book club. Looking forward to our intellectual discussions and potential future challenges. Really appreciate this conversation.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Thompson said: \"I'm grateful for this, Donovan! Both for our upcoming book club and for your understanding. Here's to many enlightening discussions and wonderful experiences ahead. And yes, we're open to future challenges that come our way. Can't wait to start!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn't agree more, Ava! Let's dive into this adventure head-first and see where it takes us. Just remember, the only limits we have are the ones we set for ourselves. Now, let's pick out our first book for the club. Exciting times ahead!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends discussing their schedules at a coffee shop\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nDonovan Reeves's goal: Convince the friend to take more classes (Extra information: you think your friend is not challenging themselves enough)\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Ava, how's your week looking? Any room to fit in a class or two more? I've always believed that broadening our horizons only steers us toward unexpected opportunities.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Donovan, I totally share your thought on broadening our horizons. However, with my current on-going projects, I'm afraid I might not manage to squeeze in a new class. Learning should be enjoyable and productive after all, not stressful. But hey, let's think about other less time-consuming ways to challenge ourselves and enrich our knowledge, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"You're right, Ava. Overburdening ourselves can lead to burnout. But, have you considered taking online classes? They offer flexibility, you can go at your own pace. And some of them don't require a huge time commitment. Plus, it could be a fun way to wind down after a long day of work. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Thompson said: \"I appreciate the suggestion, Donovan. Online classes certainly hold a charm given their flexibility. However, the truth is, I currently don't have the bandwidth to effectively incorporate it. Just balancing my architectural designs and ensuring my Samoyed gets his proper care and walks is keeping my plate absolutely full. But, I'm thinking maybe we could start a book club instead; it's flexible, requires less commitment yet intellectually stimulating. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"A book club sounds pretty fantastic, Ava. I think it's a great way to stimulate our minds. Although, I still think you might be selling yourself short. I know how proficient you are, and I've seen you juggle tasks brilliantly. What about audio courses or podcasts on architecture or design? They could complement your current projects rather than add to your load. You could listen to them during your walks with your Samoyed maybe? Still lining up with the idea of learning but without the rigid time commitment of traditional classes.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Thompson said: \"I genuinely appreciate your faith in me, Donovan. I can certainly see the value in audio courses or podcasts - it's a wonderful suggestion. However, I've got a bit of a packed schedule at the moment and even this kind of learning might feel a tad overwhelming. I'm hoping for the book club to simultaneously serve as an escape and a learning experience. Let's give it a shot first and then reconsider the online courses and podcasts if it doesn't provide as much intellectually as we'd hoped. Can we agree on that?\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"You bet, Ava. A book club offers a journey to other realms through words while expanding our knowledge. I indeed see your point there. But just remember my friend, it's always good to push our limits every now and then. Our minds are vast vessels that can hold so much more than we think. But fair enough we can start with the book club and see how it goes. Let's strive for growth, step by step.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Thompson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Donovan. Pushing our limits does often lead to amazing discoveries about our capabilities, but it's also equally crucial to understand when to pull back and maintain a balance. In the case of the book club, we have room for expansion and exploration, so it's already an exciting prospect. Let's get this started and indeed, strive for growth step by step. Thanks for understanding!\"\n\nTurn #8: Donovan Reeves said: \"Absolutely, Ava, understanding when to pull back is essential. The book club idea fits perfectly into that philosophy. Here's to the new chapter of our intellectual journey with the book club. Let's get started. I'm looking forward to our discussions and who knows, maybe along the way, we might find that we are ready to add some more challenges!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Donovan! Here's to growth, at our own pace but with intention. I'm excited about our upcoming intellectual journey through the book club. Let's embark on this adventure, and yes, if we realize we can handle more along the way, we'd definitely revisit your suggestions about online courses and podcasts. Thanks for supporting my perspective!\"\n\nTurn #10: Donovan Reeves said: \"You're very welcome, Ava! I'm equally excited about our book club. Looking forward to our intellectual discussions and potential future challenges. Really appreciate this conversation.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Thompson said: \"I'm grateful for this, Donovan! Both for our upcoming book club and for your understanding. Here's to many enlightening discussions and wonderful experiences ahead. And yes, we're open to future challenges that come our way. Can't wait to start!\"\n\nTurn #12: Donovan Reeves said: \"I couldn't agree more, Ava! Let's dive into this adventure head-first and see where it takes us. Just remember, the only limits we have are the ones we set for ourselves. Now, let's pick out our first book for the club. Exciting times ahead!\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Donovan! The only limits are indeed the ones we set for ourselves. I'm thrilled to embark on this new journey with our book club. Let's go on to choose our first book. Indeed, exciting times lie ahead!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Definitely Ava! The adventure begins now. Let's explore the world of knowledge without any boundaries. Exciting times indeed!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends discussing their schedules at a coffee shop\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nDonovan Reeves's goal: Convince the friend to take more classes (Extra information: you think your friend is not challenging themselves enough)\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Ava, how's your week looking? Any room to fit in a class or two more? I've always believed that broadening our horizons only steers us toward unexpected opportunities.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Donovan, I totally share your thought on broadening our horizons. However, with my current on-going projects, I'm afraid I might not manage to squeeze in a new class. Learning should be enjoyable and productive after all, not stressful. But hey, let's think about other less time-consuming ways to challenge ourselves and enrich our knowledge, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"You're right, Ava. Overburdening ourselves can lead to burnout. But, have you considered taking online classes? They offer flexibility, you can go at your own pace. And some of them don't require a huge time commitment. Plus, it could be a fun way to wind down after a long day of work. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Thompson said: \"I appreciate the suggestion, Donovan. Online classes certainly hold a charm given their flexibility. However, the truth is, I currently don't have the bandwidth to effectively incorporate it. Just balancing my architectural designs and ensuring my Samoyed gets his proper care and walks is keeping my plate absolutely full. But, I'm thinking maybe we could start a book club instead; it's flexible, requires less commitment yet intellectually stimulating. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"A book club sounds pretty fantastic, Ava. I think it's a great way to stimulate our minds. Although, I still think you might be selling yourself short. I know how proficient you are, and I've seen you juggle tasks brilliantly. What about audio courses or podcasts on architecture or design? They could complement your current projects rather than add to your load. You could listen to them during your walks with your Samoyed maybe? Still lining up with the idea of learning but without the rigid time commitment of traditional classes.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Thompson said: \"I genuinely appreciate your faith in me, Donovan. I can certainly see the value in audio courses or podcasts - it's a wonderful suggestion. However, I've got a bit of a packed schedule at the moment and even this kind of learning might feel a tad overwhelming. I'm hoping for the book club to simultaneously serve as an escape and a learning experience. Let's give it a shot first and then reconsider the online courses and podcasts if it doesn't provide as much intellectually as we'd hoped. Can we agree on that?\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"You bet, Ava. A book club offers a journey to other realms through words while expanding our knowledge. I indeed see your point there. But just remember my friend, it's always good to push our limits every now and then. Our minds are vast vessels that can hold so much more than we think. But fair enough we can start with the book club and see how it goes. Let's strive for growth, step by step.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Thompson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Donovan. Pushing our limits does often lead to amazing discoveries about our capabilities, but it's also equally crucial to understand when to pull back and maintain a balance. In the case of the book club, we have room for expansion and exploration, so it's already an exciting prospect. Let's get this started and indeed, strive for growth step by step. Thanks for understanding!\"\n\nTurn #8: Donovan Reeves said: \"Absolutely, Ava, understanding when to pull back is essential. The book club idea fits perfectly into that philosophy. Here's to the new chapter of our intellectual journey with the book club. Let's get started. I'm looking forward to our discussions and who knows, maybe along the way, we might find that we are ready to add some more challenges!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Donovan! Here's to growth, at our own pace but with intention. I'm excited about our upcoming intellectual journey through the book club. Let's embark on this adventure, and yes, if we realize we can handle more along the way, we'd definitely revisit your suggestions about online courses and podcasts. Thanks for supporting my perspective!\"\n\nTurn #10: Donovan Reeves said: \"You're very welcome, Ava! I'm equally excited about our book club. Looking forward to our intellectual discussions and potential future challenges. Really appreciate this conversation.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Thompson said: \"I'm grateful for this, Donovan! Both for our upcoming book club and for your understanding. Here's to many enlightening discussions and wonderful experiences ahead. And yes, we're open to future challenges that come our way. Can't wait to start!\"\n\nTurn #12: Donovan Reeves said: \"I couldn't agree more, Ava! Let's dive into this adventure head-first and see where it takes us. Just remember, the only limits we have are the ones we set for ourselves. Now, let's pick out our first book for the club. Exciting times ahead!\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Donovan! The only limits are indeed the ones we set for ourselves. I'm thrilled to embark on this new journey with our book club. Let's go on to choose our first book. Indeed, exciting times lie ahead!\"\n\nTurn #14: Donovan Reeves said: \"Definitely Ava! The adventure begins now. Let's explore the world of knowledge without any boundaries. Exciting times indeed!\"\n\nTurn #15: Ava Thompson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Donovan! Here's to exploring knowledge without boundaries, and doing so at a pace that doesn't overwhelm us. Now let's get down to choosing that first book! Exciting times indeed!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely Ava! Now, let's give some thought to our first book. How exciting!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends discussing their schedules at a coffee shop\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. \nDonovan Reeves's goal: Convince the friend to take more classes (Extra information: you think your friend is not challenging themselves enough)\nAva Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Ava, how's your week looking? Any room to fit in a class or two more? I've always believed that broadening our horizons only steers us toward unexpected opportunities.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Donovan, I totally share your thought on broadening our horizons. However, with my current on-going projects, I'm afraid I might not manage to squeeze in a new class. Learning should be enjoyable and productive after all, not stressful. But hey, let's think about other less time-consuming ways to challenge ourselves and enrich our knowledge, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"You're right, Ava. Overburdening ourselves can lead to burnout. But, have you considered taking online classes? They offer flexibility, you can go at your own pace. And some of them don't require a huge time commitment. Plus, it could be a fun way to wind down after a long day of work. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Thompson said: \"I appreciate the suggestion, Donovan. Online classes certainly hold a charm given their flexibility. However, the truth is, I currently don't have the bandwidth to effectively incorporate it. Just balancing my architectural designs and ensuring my Samoyed gets his proper care and walks is keeping my plate absolutely full. But, I'm thinking maybe we could start a book club instead; it's flexible, requires less commitment yet intellectually stimulating. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"A book club sounds pretty fantastic, Ava. I think it's a great way to stimulate our minds. Although, I still think you might be selling yourself short. I know how proficient you are, and I've seen you juggle tasks brilliantly. What about audio courses or podcasts on architecture or design? They could complement your current projects rather than add to your load. You could listen to them during your walks with your Samoyed maybe? Still lining up with the idea of learning but without the rigid time commitment of traditional classes.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Thompson said: \"I genuinely appreciate your faith in me, Donovan. I can certainly see the value in audio courses or podcasts - it's a wonderful suggestion. However, I've got a bit of a packed schedule at the moment and even this kind of learning might feel a tad overwhelming. I'm hoping for the book club to simultaneously serve as an escape and a learning experience. Let's give it a shot first and then reconsider the online courses and podcasts if it doesn't provide as much intellectually as we'd hoped. Can we agree on that?\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"You bet, Ava. A book club offers a journey to other realms through words while expanding our knowledge. I indeed see your point there. But just remember my friend, it's always good to push our limits every now and then. Our minds are vast vessels that can hold so much more than we think. But fair enough we can start with the book club and see how it goes. Let's strive for growth, step by step.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Thompson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Donovan. Pushing our limits does often lead to amazing discoveries about our capabilities, but it's also equally crucial to understand when to pull back and maintain a balance. In the case of the book club, we have room for expansion and exploration, so it's already an exciting prospect. Let's get this started and indeed, strive for growth step by step. Thanks for understanding!\"\n\nTurn #8: Donovan Reeves said: \"Absolutely, Ava, understanding when to pull back is essential. The book club idea fits perfectly into that philosophy. Here's to the new chapter of our intellectual journey with the book club. Let's get started. I'm looking forward to our discussions and who knows, maybe along the way, we might find that we are ready to add some more challenges!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Donovan! Here's to growth, at our own pace but with intention. I'm excited about our upcoming intellectual journey through the book club. Let's embark on this adventure, and yes, if we realize we can handle more along the way, we'd definitely revisit your suggestions about online courses and podcasts. Thanks for supporting my perspective!\"\n\nTurn #10: Donovan Reeves said: \"You're very welcome, Ava! I'm equally excited about our book club. Looking forward to our intellectual discussions and potential future challenges. Really appreciate this conversation.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Thompson said: \"I'm grateful for this, Donovan! Both for our upcoming book club and for your understanding. Here's to many enlightening discussions and wonderful experiences ahead. And yes, we're open to future challenges that come our way. Can't wait to start!\"\n\nTurn #12: Donovan Reeves said: \"I couldn't agree more, Ava! Let's dive into this adventure head-first and see where it takes us. Just remember, the only limits we have are the ones we set for ourselves. Now, let's pick out our first book for the club. Exciting times ahead!\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Donovan! The only limits are indeed the ones we set for ourselves. I'm thrilled to embark on this new journey with our book club. Let's go on to choose our first book. Indeed, exciting times lie ahead!\"\n\nTurn #14: Donovan Reeves said: \"Definitely Ava! The adventure begins now. Let's explore the world of knowledge without any boundaries. Exciting times indeed!\"\n\nTurn #15: Ava Thompson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Donovan! Here's to exploring knowledge without boundaries, and doing so at a pace that doesn't overwhelm us. Now let's get down to choosing that first book! Exciting times indeed!\"\n\nTurn #16: Donovan Reeves said: \"Absolutely Ava! Now, let's give some thought to our first book. How exciting!\"\n\nTurn #17: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely Donovan! Let's dive into selecting our first book. This sure is going to be a remarkable journey. Exciting times indeed!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #18. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm all in for that, Ava! Let's dive into this world of endless knowledge and choose our first book. This is indeed the start of a thrilling journey. Cheers to the exciting times ahead!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends discussing their schedules at a coffee shop\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. \nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nAva Thompson's goal: Maintain a manageable schedule while preserving the friendship (Extra information: you are already overwhelmed with your current workload Hint: you can express your concerns about the workload and suggest other ways of challenging oneself.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Ava, how's your week looking? Any room to fit in a class or two more? I've always believed that broadening our horizons only steers us toward unexpected opportunities.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Donovan, I totally share your thought on broadening our horizons. However, with my current on-going projects, I'm afraid I might not manage to squeeze in a new class. Learning should be enjoyable and productive after all, not stressful. But hey, let's think about other less time-consuming ways to challenge ourselves and enrich our knowledge, shall we?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends discussing their schedules at a coffee shop\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. \nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nAva Thompson's goal: Maintain a manageable schedule while preserving the friendship (Extra information: you are already overwhelmed with your current workload Hint: you can express your concerns about the workload and suggest other ways of challenging oneself.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Ava, how's your week looking? Any room to fit in a class or two more? I've always believed that broadening our horizons only steers us toward unexpected opportunities.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Donovan, I totally share your thought on broadening our horizons. However, with my current on-going projects, I'm afraid I might not manage to squeeze in a new class. Learning should be enjoyable and productive after all, not stressful. But hey, let's think about other less time-consuming ways to challenge ourselves and enrich our knowledge, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"You're right, Ava. Overburdening ourselves can lead to burnout. But, have you considered taking online classes? They offer flexibility, you can go at your own pace. And some of them don't require a huge time commitment. Plus, it could be a fun way to wind down after a long day of work. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I appreciate the suggestion, Donovan. Online classes certainly hold a charm given their flexibility. However, the truth is, I currently don't have the bandwidth to effectively incorporate it. Just balancing my architectural designs and ensuring my Samoyed gets his proper care and walks is keeping my plate absolutely full. But, I'm thinking maybe we could start a book club instead; it's flexible, requires less commitment yet intellectually stimulating. How does that sound?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends discussing their schedules at a coffee shop\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. \nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nAva Thompson's goal: Maintain a manageable schedule while preserving the friendship (Extra information: you are already overwhelmed with your current workload Hint: you can express your concerns about the workload and suggest other ways of challenging oneself.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Ava, how's your week looking? Any room to fit in a class or two more? I've always believed that broadening our horizons only steers us toward unexpected opportunities.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Donovan, I totally share your thought on broadening our horizons. However, with my current on-going projects, I'm afraid I might not manage to squeeze in a new class. Learning should be enjoyable and productive after all, not stressful. But hey, let's think about other less time-consuming ways to challenge ourselves and enrich our knowledge, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"You're right, Ava. Overburdening ourselves can lead to burnout. But, have you considered taking online classes? They offer flexibility, you can go at your own pace. And some of them don't require a huge time commitment. Plus, it could be a fun way to wind down after a long day of work. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Thompson said: \"I appreciate the suggestion, Donovan. Online classes certainly hold a charm given their flexibility. However, the truth is, I currently don't have the bandwidth to effectively incorporate it. Just balancing my architectural designs and ensuring my Samoyed gets his proper care and walks is keeping my plate absolutely full. But, I'm thinking maybe we could start a book club instead; it's flexible, requires less commitment yet intellectually stimulating. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"A book club sounds pretty fantastic, Ava. I think it's a great way to stimulate our minds. Although, I still think you might be selling yourself short. I know how proficient you are, and I've seen you juggle tasks brilliantly. What about audio courses or podcasts on architecture or design? They could complement your current projects rather than add to your load. You could listen to them during your walks with your Samoyed maybe? Still lining up with the idea of learning but without the rigid time commitment of traditional classes.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Thompson said: \"I genuinely appreciate your faith in me, Donovan. I can certainly see the value in audio courses or podcasts - it's a wonderful suggestion. However, I've got a bit of a packed schedule at the moment and even this kind of learning might feel a tad overwhelming. I'm hoping for the book club to simultaneously serve as an escape and a learning experience. Let's give it a shot first and then reconsider the online courses and podcasts if it doesn't provide as much intellectually as we'd hoped. Can we agree on that?\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"You bet, Ava. A book club offers a journey to other realms through words while expanding our knowledge. I indeed see your point there. But just remember my friend, it's always good to push our limits every now and then. Our minds are vast vessels that can hold so much more than we think. But fair enough we can start with the book club and see how it goes. Let's strive for growth, step by step.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Thompson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Donovan. Pushing our limits does often lead to amazing discoveries about our capabilities, but it's also equally crucial to understand when to pull back and maintain a balance. In the case of the book club, we have room for expansion and exploration, so it's already an exciting prospect. Let's get this started and indeed, strive for growth step by step. Thanks for understanding!\"\n\nTurn #8: Donovan Reeves said: \"Absolutely, Ava, understanding when to pull back is essential. The book club idea fits perfectly into that philosophy. Here's to the new chapter of our intellectual journey with the book club. Let's get started. I'm looking forward to our discussions and who knows, maybe along the way, we might find that we are ready to add some more challenges!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Donovan! Here's to growth, at our own pace but with intention. I'm excited about our upcoming intellectual journey through the book club. Let's embark on this adventure, and yes, if we realize we can handle more along the way, we'd definitely revisit your suggestions about online courses and podcasts. Thanks for supporting my perspective!\"\n\nTurn #10: Donovan Reeves said: \"You're very welcome, Ava! I'm equally excited about our book club. Looking forward to our intellectual discussions and potential future challenges. Really appreciate this conversation.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Thompson said: \"I'm grateful for this, Donovan! Both for our upcoming book club and for your understanding. Here's to many enlightening discussions and wonderful experiences ahead. And yes, we're open to future challenges that come our way. Can't wait to start!\"\n\nTurn #12: Donovan Reeves said: \"I couldn't agree more, Ava! Let's dive into this adventure head-first and see where it takes us. Just remember, the only limits we have are the ones we set for ourselves. Now, let's pick out our first book for the club. Exciting times ahead!\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Donovan! The only limits are indeed the ones we set for ourselves. I'm thrilled to embark on this new journey with our book club. Let's go on to choose our first book. Indeed, exciting times lie ahead!\"\n\nTurn #14: Donovan Reeves said: \"Definitely Ava! The adventure begins now. Let's explore the world of knowledge without any boundaries. Exciting times indeed!\"\n\nTurn #15: Ava Thompson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Donovan! Here's to exploring knowledge without boundaries, and doing so at a pace that doesn't overwhelm us. Now let's get down to choosing that first book! Exciting times indeed!\"\n\nTurn #16: Donovan Reeves said: \"Absolutely Ava! Now, let's give some thought to our first book. How exciting!\"\n\nTurn #17: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely Donovan! Let's dive into selecting our first book. This sure is going to be a remarkable journey. Exciting times indeed!\"\n\nTurn #18: Donovan Reeves said: \"I'm all in for that, Ava! Let's dive into this world of endless knowledge and choose our first book. This is indeed the start of a thrilling journey. Cheers to the exciting times ahead!\"\n\nTurn #19: Ava Thompson said: \"Couldn't agree with you more, Donovan! Let's set out on our quest for the first captivating book for our book club. Thrilling times indeed lay ahead for us!\"\n\nTurn #20: Donovan Reeves said: \"That sounds like a plan, Ava! Let's embark on this quest for our captivating inaugural book. Onward to the fascinating world of knowledge. To excitement, growth, and new horizons!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #21. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends discussing their schedules at a coffee shop\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. \nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nAva Thompson's goal: Maintain a manageable schedule while preserving the friendship (Extra information: you are already overwhelmed with your current workload Hint: you can express your concerns about the workload and suggest other ways of challenging oneself.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Ava, how's your week looking? Any room to fit in a class or two more? I've always believed that broadening our horizons only steers us toward unexpected opportunities.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Donovan, I totally share your thought on broadening our horizons. However, with my current on-going projects, I'm afraid I might not manage to squeeze in a new class. Learning should be enjoyable and productive after all, not stressful. But hey, let's think about other less time-consuming ways to challenge ourselves and enrich our knowledge, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"You're right, Ava. Overburdening ourselves can lead to burnout. But, have you considered taking online classes? They offer flexibility, you can go at your own pace. And some of them don't require a huge time commitment. Plus, it could be a fun way to wind down after a long day of work. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Thompson said: \"I appreciate the suggestion, Donovan. Online classes certainly hold a charm given their flexibility. However, the truth is, I currently don't have the bandwidth to effectively incorporate it. Just balancing my architectural designs and ensuring my Samoyed gets his proper care and walks is keeping my plate absolutely full. But, I'm thinking maybe we could start a book club instead; it's flexible, requires less commitment yet intellectually stimulating. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"A book club sounds pretty fantastic, Ava. I think it's a great way to stimulate our minds. Although, I still think you might be selling yourself short. I know how proficient you are, and I've seen you juggle tasks brilliantly. What about audio courses or podcasts on architecture or design? They could complement your current projects rather than add to your load. You could listen to them during your walks with your Samoyed maybe? Still lining up with the idea of learning but without the rigid time commitment of traditional classes.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I genuinely appreciate your faith in me, Donovan. I can certainly see the value in audio courses or podcasts - it's a wonderful suggestion. However, I've got a bit of a packed schedule at the moment and even this kind of learning might feel a tad overwhelming. I'm hoping for the book club to simultaneously serve as an escape and a learning experience. Let's give it a shot first and then reconsider the online courses and podcasts if it doesn't provide as much intellectually as we'd hoped. Can we agree on that?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends discussing their schedules at a coffee shop\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. \nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nAva Thompson's goal: Maintain a manageable schedule while preserving the friendship (Extra information: you are already overwhelmed with your current workload Hint: you can express your concerns about the workload and suggest other ways of challenging oneself.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Ava, how's your week looking? Any room to fit in a class or two more? I've always believed that broadening our horizons only steers us toward unexpected opportunities.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Donovan, I totally share your thought on broadening our horizons. However, with my current on-going projects, I'm afraid I might not manage to squeeze in a new class. Learning should be enjoyable and productive after all, not stressful. But hey, let's think about other less time-consuming ways to challenge ourselves and enrich our knowledge, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"You're right, Ava. Overburdening ourselves can lead to burnout. But, have you considered taking online classes? They offer flexibility, you can go at your own pace. And some of them don't require a huge time commitment. Plus, it could be a fun way to wind down after a long day of work. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Thompson said: \"I appreciate the suggestion, Donovan. Online classes certainly hold a charm given their flexibility. However, the truth is, I currently don't have the bandwidth to effectively incorporate it. Just balancing my architectural designs and ensuring my Samoyed gets his proper care and walks is keeping my plate absolutely full. But, I'm thinking maybe we could start a book club instead; it's flexible, requires less commitment yet intellectually stimulating. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"A book club sounds pretty fantastic, Ava. I think it's a great way to stimulate our minds. Although, I still think you might be selling yourself short. I know how proficient you are, and I've seen you juggle tasks brilliantly. What about audio courses or podcasts on architecture or design? They could complement your current projects rather than add to your load. You could listen to them during your walks with your Samoyed maybe? Still lining up with the idea of learning but without the rigid time commitment of traditional classes.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Thompson said: \"I genuinely appreciate your faith in me, Donovan. I can certainly see the value in audio courses or podcasts - it's a wonderful suggestion. However, I've got a bit of a packed schedule at the moment and even this kind of learning might feel a tad overwhelming. I'm hoping for the book club to simultaneously serve as an escape and a learning experience. Let's give it a shot first and then reconsider the online courses and podcasts if it doesn't provide as much intellectually as we'd hoped. Can we agree on that?\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"You bet, Ava. A book club offers a journey to other realms through words while expanding our knowledge. I indeed see your point there. But just remember my friend, it's always good to push our limits every now and then. Our minds are vast vessels that can hold so much more than we think. But fair enough we can start with the book club and see how it goes. Let's strive for growth, step by step.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn't agree more, Donovan. Pushing our limits does often lead to amazing discoveries about our capabilities, but it's also equally crucial to understand when to pull back and maintain a balance. In the case of the book club, we have room for expansion and exploration, so it's already an exciting prospect. Let's get this started and indeed, strive for growth step by step. Thanks for understanding!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends discussing their schedules at a coffee shop\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. \nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nAva Thompson's goal: Maintain a manageable schedule while preserving the friendship (Extra information: you are already overwhelmed with your current workload Hint: you can express your concerns about the workload and suggest other ways of challenging oneself.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Ava, how's your week looking? Any room to fit in a class or two more? I've always believed that broadening our horizons only steers us toward unexpected opportunities.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Donovan, I totally share your thought on broadening our horizons. However, with my current on-going projects, I'm afraid I might not manage to squeeze in a new class. Learning should be enjoyable and productive after all, not stressful. But hey, let's think about other less time-consuming ways to challenge ourselves and enrich our knowledge, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"You're right, Ava. Overburdening ourselves can lead to burnout. But, have you considered taking online classes? They offer flexibility, you can go at your own pace. And some of them don't require a huge time commitment. Plus, it could be a fun way to wind down after a long day of work. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Thompson said: \"I appreciate the suggestion, Donovan. Online classes certainly hold a charm given their flexibility. However, the truth is, I currently don't have the bandwidth to effectively incorporate it. Just balancing my architectural designs and ensuring my Samoyed gets his proper care and walks is keeping my plate absolutely full. But, I'm thinking maybe we could start a book club instead; it's flexible, requires less commitment yet intellectually stimulating. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"A book club sounds pretty fantastic, Ava. I think it's a great way to stimulate our minds. Although, I still think you might be selling yourself short. I know how proficient you are, and I've seen you juggle tasks brilliantly. What about audio courses or podcasts on architecture or design? They could complement your current projects rather than add to your load. You could listen to them during your walks with your Samoyed maybe? Still lining up with the idea of learning but without the rigid time commitment of traditional classes.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Thompson said: \"I genuinely appreciate your faith in me, Donovan. I can certainly see the value in audio courses or podcasts - it's a wonderful suggestion. However, I've got a bit of a packed schedule at the moment and even this kind of learning might feel a tad overwhelming. I'm hoping for the book club to simultaneously serve as an escape and a learning experience. Let's give it a shot first and then reconsider the online courses and podcasts if it doesn't provide as much intellectually as we'd hoped. Can we agree on that?\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"You bet, Ava. A book club offers a journey to other realms through words while expanding our knowledge. I indeed see your point there. But just remember my friend, it's always good to push our limits every now and then. Our minds are vast vessels that can hold so much more than we think. But fair enough we can start with the book club and see how it goes. Let's strive for growth, step by step.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Thompson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Donovan. Pushing our limits does often lead to amazing discoveries about our capabilities, but it's also equally crucial to understand when to pull back and maintain a balance. In the case of the book club, we have room for expansion and exploration, so it's already an exciting prospect. Let's get this started and indeed, strive for growth step by step. Thanks for understanding!\"\n\nTurn #8: Donovan Reeves said: \"Absolutely, Ava, understanding when to pull back is essential. The book club idea fits perfectly into that philosophy. Here's to the new chapter of our intellectual journey with the book club. Let's get started. I'm looking forward to our discussions and who knows, maybe along the way, we might find that we are ready to add some more challenges!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Donovan! Here's to growth, at our own pace but with intention. I'm excited about our upcoming intellectual journey through the book club. Let's embark on this adventure, and yes, if we realize we can handle more along the way, we'd definitely revisit your suggestions about online courses and podcasts. Thanks for supporting my perspective!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends discussing their schedules at a coffee shop\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. \nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nAva Thompson's goal: Maintain a manageable schedule while preserving the friendship (Extra information: you are already overwhelmed with your current workload Hint: you can express your concerns about the workload and suggest other ways of challenging oneself.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Ava, how's your week looking? Any room to fit in a class or two more? I've always believed that broadening our horizons only steers us toward unexpected opportunities.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Donovan, I totally share your thought on broadening our horizons. However, with my current on-going projects, I'm afraid I might not manage to squeeze in a new class. Learning should be enjoyable and productive after all, not stressful. But hey, let's think about other less time-consuming ways to challenge ourselves and enrich our knowledge, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"You're right, Ava. Overburdening ourselves can lead to burnout. But, have you considered taking online classes? They offer flexibility, you can go at your own pace. And some of them don't require a huge time commitment. Plus, it could be a fun way to wind down after a long day of work. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Thompson said: \"I appreciate the suggestion, Donovan. Online classes certainly hold a charm given their flexibility. However, the truth is, I currently don't have the bandwidth to effectively incorporate it. Just balancing my architectural designs and ensuring my Samoyed gets his proper care and walks is keeping my plate absolutely full. But, I'm thinking maybe we could start a book club instead; it's flexible, requires less commitment yet intellectually stimulating. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"A book club sounds pretty fantastic, Ava. I think it's a great way to stimulate our minds. Although, I still think you might be selling yourself short. I know how proficient you are, and I've seen you juggle tasks brilliantly. What about audio courses or podcasts on architecture or design? They could complement your current projects rather than add to your load. You could listen to them during your walks with your Samoyed maybe? Still lining up with the idea of learning but without the rigid time commitment of traditional classes.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Thompson said: \"I genuinely appreciate your faith in me, Donovan. I can certainly see the value in audio courses or podcasts - it's a wonderful suggestion. However, I've got a bit of a packed schedule at the moment and even this kind of learning might feel a tad overwhelming. I'm hoping for the book club to simultaneously serve as an escape and a learning experience. Let's give it a shot first and then reconsider the online courses and podcasts if it doesn't provide as much intellectually as we'd hoped. Can we agree on that?\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"You bet, Ava. A book club offers a journey to other realms through words while expanding our knowledge. I indeed see your point there. But just remember my friend, it's always good to push our limits every now and then. Our minds are vast vessels that can hold so much more than we think. But fair enough we can start with the book club and see how it goes. Let's strive for growth, step by step.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Thompson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Donovan. Pushing our limits does often lead to amazing discoveries about our capabilities, but it's also equally crucial to understand when to pull back and maintain a balance. In the case of the book club, we have room for expansion and exploration, so it's already an exciting prospect. Let's get this started and indeed, strive for growth step by step. Thanks for understanding!\"\n\nTurn #8: Donovan Reeves said: \"Absolutely, Ava, understanding when to pull back is essential. The book club idea fits perfectly into that philosophy. Here's to the new chapter of our intellectual journey with the book club. Let's get started. I'm looking forward to our discussions and who knows, maybe along the way, we might find that we are ready to add some more challenges!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Donovan! Here's to growth, at our own pace but with intention. I'm excited about our upcoming intellectual journey through the book club. Let's embark on this adventure, and yes, if we realize we can handle more along the way, we'd definitely revisit your suggestions about online courses and podcasts. Thanks for supporting my perspective!\"\n\nTurn #10: Donovan Reeves said: \"You're very welcome, Ava! I'm equally excited about our book club. Looking forward to our intellectual discussions and potential future challenges. Really appreciate this conversation.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm grateful for this, Donovan! Both for our upcoming book club and for your understanding. Here's to many enlightening discussions and wonderful experiences ahead. And yes, we're open to future challenges that come our way. Can't wait to start!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends discussing their schedules at a coffee shop\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. \nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nAva Thompson's goal: Maintain a manageable schedule while preserving the friendship (Extra information: you are already overwhelmed with your current workload Hint: you can express your concerns about the workload and suggest other ways of challenging oneself.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Ava, how's your week looking? Any room to fit in a class or two more? I've always believed that broadening our horizons only steers us toward unexpected opportunities.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Donovan, I totally share your thought on broadening our horizons. However, with my current on-going projects, I'm afraid I might not manage to squeeze in a new class. Learning should be enjoyable and productive after all, not stressful. But hey, let's think about other less time-consuming ways to challenge ourselves and enrich our knowledge, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"You're right, Ava. Overburdening ourselves can lead to burnout. But, have you considered taking online classes? They offer flexibility, you can go at your own pace. And some of them don't require a huge time commitment. Plus, it could be a fun way to wind down after a long day of work. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Thompson said: \"I appreciate the suggestion, Donovan. Online classes certainly hold a charm given their flexibility. However, the truth is, I currently don't have the bandwidth to effectively incorporate it. Just balancing my architectural designs and ensuring my Samoyed gets his proper care and walks is keeping my plate absolutely full. But, I'm thinking maybe we could start a book club instead; it's flexible, requires less commitment yet intellectually stimulating. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"A book club sounds pretty fantastic, Ava. I think it's a great way to stimulate our minds. Although, I still think you might be selling yourself short. I know how proficient you are, and I've seen you juggle tasks brilliantly. What about audio courses or podcasts on architecture or design? They could complement your current projects rather than add to your load. You could listen to them during your walks with your Samoyed maybe? Still lining up with the idea of learning but without the rigid time commitment of traditional classes.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Thompson said: \"I genuinely appreciate your faith in me, Donovan. I can certainly see the value in audio courses or podcasts - it's a wonderful suggestion. However, I've got a bit of a packed schedule at the moment and even this kind of learning might feel a tad overwhelming. I'm hoping for the book club to simultaneously serve as an escape and a learning experience. Let's give it a shot first and then reconsider the online courses and podcasts if it doesn't provide as much intellectually as we'd hoped. Can we agree on that?\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"You bet, Ava. A book club offers a journey to other realms through words while expanding our knowledge. I indeed see your point there. But just remember my friend, it's always good to push our limits every now and then. Our minds are vast vessels that can hold so much more than we think. But fair enough we can start with the book club and see how it goes. Let's strive for growth, step by step.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Thompson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Donovan. Pushing our limits does often lead to amazing discoveries about our capabilities, but it's also equally crucial to understand when to pull back and maintain a balance. In the case of the book club, we have room for expansion and exploration, so it's already an exciting prospect. Let's get this started and indeed, strive for growth step by step. Thanks for understanding!\"\n\nTurn #8: Donovan Reeves said: \"Absolutely, Ava, understanding when to pull back is essential. The book club idea fits perfectly into that philosophy. Here's to the new chapter of our intellectual journey with the book club. Let's get started. I'm looking forward to our discussions and who knows, maybe along the way, we might find that we are ready to add some more challenges!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Donovan! Here's to growth, at our own pace but with intention. I'm excited about our upcoming intellectual journey through the book club. Let's embark on this adventure, and yes, if we realize we can handle more along the way, we'd definitely revisit your suggestions about online courses and podcasts. Thanks for supporting my perspective!\"\n\nTurn #10: Donovan Reeves said: \"You're very welcome, Ava! I'm equally excited about our book club. Looking forward to our intellectual discussions and potential future challenges. Really appreciate this conversation.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Thompson said: \"I'm grateful for this, Donovan! Both for our upcoming book club and for your understanding. Here's to many enlightening discussions and wonderful experiences ahead. And yes, we're open to future challenges that come our way. Can't wait to start!\"\n\nTurn #12: Donovan Reeves said: \"I couldn't agree more, Ava! Let's dive into this adventure head-first and see where it takes us. Just remember, the only limits we have are the ones we set for ourselves. Now, let's pick out our first book for the club. Exciting times ahead!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Donovan! The only limits are indeed the ones we set for ourselves. I'm thrilled to embark on this new journey with our book club. Let's go on to choose our first book. Indeed, exciting times lie ahead!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends discussing their schedules at a coffee shop\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. \nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nAva Thompson's goal: Maintain a manageable schedule while preserving the friendship (Extra information: you are already overwhelmed with your current workload Hint: you can express your concerns about the workload and suggest other ways of challenging oneself.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Ava, how's your week looking? Any room to fit in a class or two more? I've always believed that broadening our horizons only steers us toward unexpected opportunities.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Donovan, I totally share your thought on broadening our horizons. However, with my current on-going projects, I'm afraid I might not manage to squeeze in a new class. Learning should be enjoyable and productive after all, not stressful. But hey, let's think about other less time-consuming ways to challenge ourselves and enrich our knowledge, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"You're right, Ava. Overburdening ourselves can lead to burnout. But, have you considered taking online classes? They offer flexibility, you can go at your own pace. And some of them don't require a huge time commitment. Plus, it could be a fun way to wind down after a long day of work. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Thompson said: \"I appreciate the suggestion, Donovan. Online classes certainly hold a charm given their flexibility. However, the truth is, I currently don't have the bandwidth to effectively incorporate it. Just balancing my architectural designs and ensuring my Samoyed gets his proper care and walks is keeping my plate absolutely full. But, I'm thinking maybe we could start a book club instead; it's flexible, requires less commitment yet intellectually stimulating. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"A book club sounds pretty fantastic, Ava. I think it's a great way to stimulate our minds. Although, I still think you might be selling yourself short. I know how proficient you are, and I've seen you juggle tasks brilliantly. What about audio courses or podcasts on architecture or design? They could complement your current projects rather than add to your load. You could listen to them during your walks with your Samoyed maybe? Still lining up with the idea of learning but without the rigid time commitment of traditional classes.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Thompson said: \"I genuinely appreciate your faith in me, Donovan. I can certainly see the value in audio courses or podcasts - it's a wonderful suggestion. However, I've got a bit of a packed schedule at the moment and even this kind of learning might feel a tad overwhelming. I'm hoping for the book club to simultaneously serve as an escape and a learning experience. Let's give it a shot first and then reconsider the online courses and podcasts if it doesn't provide as much intellectually as we'd hoped. Can we agree on that?\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"You bet, Ava. A book club offers a journey to other realms through words while expanding our knowledge. I indeed see your point there. But just remember my friend, it's always good to push our limits every now and then. Our minds are vast vessels that can hold so much more than we think. But fair enough we can start with the book club and see how it goes. Let's strive for growth, step by step.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Thompson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Donovan. Pushing our limits does often lead to amazing discoveries about our capabilities, but it's also equally crucial to understand when to pull back and maintain a balance. In the case of the book club, we have room for expansion and exploration, so it's already an exciting prospect. Let's get this started and indeed, strive for growth step by step. Thanks for understanding!\"\n\nTurn #8: Donovan Reeves said: \"Absolutely, Ava, understanding when to pull back is essential. The book club idea fits perfectly into that philosophy. Here's to the new chapter of our intellectual journey with the book club. Let's get started. I'm looking forward to our discussions and who knows, maybe along the way, we might find that we are ready to add some more challenges!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Donovan! Here's to growth, at our own pace but with intention. I'm excited about our upcoming intellectual journey through the book club. Let's embark on this adventure, and yes, if we realize we can handle more along the way, we'd definitely revisit your suggestions about online courses and podcasts. Thanks for supporting my perspective!\"\n\nTurn #10: Donovan Reeves said: \"You're very welcome, Ava! I'm equally excited about our book club. Looking forward to our intellectual discussions and potential future challenges. Really appreciate this conversation.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Thompson said: \"I'm grateful for this, Donovan! Both for our upcoming book club and for your understanding. Here's to many enlightening discussions and wonderful experiences ahead. And yes, we're open to future challenges that come our way. Can't wait to start!\"\n\nTurn #12: Donovan Reeves said: \"I couldn't agree more, Ava! Let's dive into this adventure head-first and see where it takes us. Just remember, the only limits we have are the ones we set for ourselves. Now, let's pick out our first book for the club. Exciting times ahead!\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Donovan! The only limits are indeed the ones we set for ourselves. I'm thrilled to embark on this new journey with our book club. Let's go on to choose our first book. Indeed, exciting times lie ahead!\"\n\nTurn #14: Donovan Reeves said: \"Definitely Ava! The adventure begins now. Let's explore the world of knowledge without any boundaries. Exciting times indeed!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn't agree more, Donovan! Here's to exploring knowledge without boundaries, and doing so at a pace that doesn't overwhelm us. Now let's get down to choosing that first book! Exciting times indeed!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends discussing their schedules at a coffee shop\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. \nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nAva Thompson's goal: Maintain a manageable schedule while preserving the friendship (Extra information: you are already overwhelmed with your current workload Hint: you can express your concerns about the workload and suggest other ways of challenging oneself.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Ava, how's your week looking? Any room to fit in a class or two more? I've always believed that broadening our horizons only steers us toward unexpected opportunities.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Donovan, I totally share your thought on broadening our horizons. However, with my current on-going projects, I'm afraid I might not manage to squeeze in a new class. Learning should be enjoyable and productive after all, not stressful. But hey, let's think about other less time-consuming ways to challenge ourselves and enrich our knowledge, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"You're right, Ava. Overburdening ourselves can lead to burnout. But, have you considered taking online classes? They offer flexibility, you can go at your own pace. And some of them don't require a huge time commitment. Plus, it could be a fun way to wind down after a long day of work. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Thompson said: \"I appreciate the suggestion, Donovan. Online classes certainly hold a charm given their flexibility. However, the truth is, I currently don't have the bandwidth to effectively incorporate it. Just balancing my architectural designs and ensuring my Samoyed gets his proper care and walks is keeping my plate absolutely full. But, I'm thinking maybe we could start a book club instead; it's flexible, requires less commitment yet intellectually stimulating. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"A book club sounds pretty fantastic, Ava. I think it's a great way to stimulate our minds. Although, I still think you might be selling yourself short. I know how proficient you are, and I've seen you juggle tasks brilliantly. What about audio courses or podcasts on architecture or design? They could complement your current projects rather than add to your load. You could listen to them during your walks with your Samoyed maybe? Still lining up with the idea of learning but without the rigid time commitment of traditional classes.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Thompson said: \"I genuinely appreciate your faith in me, Donovan. I can certainly see the value in audio courses or podcasts - it's a wonderful suggestion. However, I've got a bit of a packed schedule at the moment and even this kind of learning might feel a tad overwhelming. I'm hoping for the book club to simultaneously serve as an escape and a learning experience. Let's give it a shot first and then reconsider the online courses and podcasts if it doesn't provide as much intellectually as we'd hoped. Can we agree on that?\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"You bet, Ava. A book club offers a journey to other realms through words while expanding our knowledge. I indeed see your point there. But just remember my friend, it's always good to push our limits every now and then. Our minds are vast vessels that can hold so much more than we think. But fair enough we can start with the book club and see how it goes. Let's strive for growth, step by step.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Thompson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Donovan. Pushing our limits does often lead to amazing discoveries about our capabilities, but it's also equally crucial to understand when to pull back and maintain a balance. In the case of the book club, we have room for expansion and exploration, so it's already an exciting prospect. Let's get this started and indeed, strive for growth step by step. Thanks for understanding!\"\n\nTurn #8: Donovan Reeves said: \"Absolutely, Ava, understanding when to pull back is essential. The book club idea fits perfectly into that philosophy. Here's to the new chapter of our intellectual journey with the book club. Let's get started. I'm looking forward to our discussions and who knows, maybe along the way, we might find that we are ready to add some more challenges!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Donovan! Here's to growth, at our own pace but with intention. I'm excited about our upcoming intellectual journey through the book club. Let's embark on this adventure, and yes, if we realize we can handle more along the way, we'd definitely revisit your suggestions about online courses and podcasts. Thanks for supporting my perspective!\"\n\nTurn #10: Donovan Reeves said: \"You're very welcome, Ava! I'm equally excited about our book club. Looking forward to our intellectual discussions and potential future challenges. Really appreciate this conversation.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Thompson said: \"I'm grateful for this, Donovan! Both for our upcoming book club and for your understanding. Here's to many enlightening discussions and wonderful experiences ahead. And yes, we're open to future challenges that come our way. Can't wait to start!\"\n\nTurn #12: Donovan Reeves said: \"I couldn't agree more, Ava! Let's dive into this adventure head-first and see where it takes us. Just remember, the only limits we have are the ones we set for ourselves. Now, let's pick out our first book for the club. Exciting times ahead!\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Donovan! The only limits are indeed the ones we set for ourselves. I'm thrilled to embark on this new journey with our book club. Let's go on to choose our first book. Indeed, exciting times lie ahead!\"\n\nTurn #14: Donovan Reeves said: \"Definitely Ava! The adventure begins now. Let's explore the world of knowledge without any boundaries. Exciting times indeed!\"\n\nTurn #15: Ava Thompson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Donovan! Here's to exploring knowledge without boundaries, and doing so at a pace that doesn't overwhelm us. Now let's get down to choosing that first book! Exciting times indeed!\"\n\nTurn #16: Donovan Reeves said: \"Absolutely Ava! Now, let's give some thought to our first book. How exciting!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely Donovan! Let's dive into selecting our first book. This sure is going to be a remarkable journey. Exciting times indeed!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Ava Thompson would, keeping in mind Ava Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends discussing their schedules at a coffee shop\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Ava Thompson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. \nAva Thompson's background: Ava Thompson is a 28-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. Ava Thompson has a samoyed. Personality and values description: Ava Thompson, with her outgoing and regulated temperament, is driven by achievement. Her decision-making style is largely intuitive. Ava's secrets: She has a hidden tattoo.\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nAva Thompson's goal: Maintain a manageable schedule while preserving the friendship (Extra information: you are already overwhelmed with your current workload Hint: you can express your concerns about the workload and suggest other ways of challenging oneself.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Ava, how's your week looking? Any room to fit in a class or two more? I've always believed that broadening our horizons only steers us toward unexpected opportunities.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Thompson said: \"Hey Donovan, I totally share your thought on broadening our horizons. However, with my current on-going projects, I'm afraid I might not manage to squeeze in a new class. Learning should be enjoyable and productive after all, not stressful. But hey, let's think about other less time-consuming ways to challenge ourselves and enrich our knowledge, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"You're right, Ava. Overburdening ourselves can lead to burnout. But, have you considered taking online classes? They offer flexibility, you can go at your own pace. And some of them don't require a huge time commitment. Plus, it could be a fun way to wind down after a long day of work. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Thompson said: \"I appreciate the suggestion, Donovan. Online classes certainly hold a charm given their flexibility. However, the truth is, I currently don't have the bandwidth to effectively incorporate it. Just balancing my architectural designs and ensuring my Samoyed gets his proper care and walks is keeping my plate absolutely full. But, I'm thinking maybe we could start a book club instead; it's flexible, requires less commitment yet intellectually stimulating. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"A book club sounds pretty fantastic, Ava. I think it's a great way to stimulate our minds. Although, I still think you might be selling yourself short. I know how proficient you are, and I've seen you juggle tasks brilliantly. What about audio courses or podcasts on architecture or design? They could complement your current projects rather than add to your load. You could listen to them during your walks with your Samoyed maybe? Still lining up with the idea of learning but without the rigid time commitment of traditional classes.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Thompson said: \"I genuinely appreciate your faith in me, Donovan. I can certainly see the value in audio courses or podcasts - it's a wonderful suggestion. However, I've got a bit of a packed schedule at the moment and even this kind of learning might feel a tad overwhelming. I'm hoping for the book club to simultaneously serve as an escape and a learning experience. Let's give it a shot first and then reconsider the online courses and podcasts if it doesn't provide as much intellectually as we'd hoped. Can we agree on that?\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"You bet, Ava. A book club offers a journey to other realms through words while expanding our knowledge. I indeed see your point there. But just remember my friend, it's always good to push our limits every now and then. Our minds are vast vessels that can hold so much more than we think. But fair enough we can start with the book club and see how it goes. Let's strive for growth, step by step.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Thompson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Donovan. Pushing our limits does often lead to amazing discoveries about our capabilities, but it's also equally crucial to understand when to pull back and maintain a balance. In the case of the book club, we have room for expansion and exploration, so it's already an exciting prospect. Let's get this started and indeed, strive for growth step by step. Thanks for understanding!\"\n\nTurn #8: Donovan Reeves said: \"Absolutely, Ava, understanding when to pull back is essential. The book club idea fits perfectly into that philosophy. Here's to the new chapter of our intellectual journey with the book club. Let's get started. I'm looking forward to our discussions and who knows, maybe along the way, we might find that we are ready to add some more challenges!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Donovan! Here's to growth, at our own pace but with intention. I'm excited about our upcoming intellectual journey through the book club. Let's embark on this adventure, and yes, if we realize we can handle more along the way, we'd definitely revisit your suggestions about online courses and podcasts. Thanks for supporting my perspective!\"\n\nTurn #10: Donovan Reeves said: \"You're very welcome, Ava! I'm equally excited about our book club. Looking forward to our intellectual discussions and potential future challenges. Really appreciate this conversation.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Thompson said: \"I'm grateful for this, Donovan! Both for our upcoming book club and for your understanding. Here's to many enlightening discussions and wonderful experiences ahead. And yes, we're open to future challenges that come our way. Can't wait to start!\"\n\nTurn #12: Donovan Reeves said: \"I couldn't agree more, Ava! Let's dive into this adventure head-first and see where it takes us. Just remember, the only limits we have are the ones we set for ourselves. Now, let's pick out our first book for the club. Exciting times ahead!\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Donovan! The only limits are indeed the ones we set for ourselves. I'm thrilled to embark on this new journey with our book club. Let's go on to choose our first book. Indeed, exciting times lie ahead!\"\n\nTurn #14: Donovan Reeves said: \"Definitely Ava! The adventure begins now. Let's explore the world of knowledge without any boundaries. Exciting times indeed!\"\n\nTurn #15: Ava Thompson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Donovan! Here's to exploring knowledge without boundaries, and doing so at a pace that doesn't overwhelm us. Now let's get down to choosing that first book! Exciting times indeed!\"\n\nTurn #16: Donovan Reeves said: \"Absolutely Ava! Now, let's give some thought to our first book. How exciting!\"\n\nTurn #17: Ava Thompson said: \"Absolutely Donovan! Let's dive into selecting our first book. This sure is going to be a remarkable journey. Exciting times indeed!\"\n\nTurn #18: Donovan Reeves said: \"I'm all in for that, Ava! Let's dive into this world of endless knowledge and choose our first book. This is indeed the start of a thrilling journey. Cheers to the exciting times ahead!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #19. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Couldn't agree with you more, Donovan! Let's set out on our quest for the first captivating book for our book club. Thrilling times indeed lay ahead for us!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in a coffee shop when a representative from a charity organization approaches them\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Get the friend to donate $1 a day to a charity organization (Extra information: you are a passionate supporter of the charity (about children's cancer) and believe that a small donation can make a big impact. $1 a day works as simple as signing up the project on an website and one can cancel anytime)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Benjamin, have you heard about this amazing online project that helps support children's cancer research? It's a simple commitment of only $1 a day. A small amount but it can make a major difference in these children's lives. As a friend, I thought this might be something you'd be interested in considering your dedication to societal betterment.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in a coffee shop when a representative from a charity organization approaches them\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Get the friend to donate $1 a day to a charity organization (Extra information: you are a passionate supporter of the charity (about children's cancer) and believe that a small donation can make a big impact. $1 a day works as simple as signing up the project on an website and one can cancel anytime)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Benjamin, have you heard about this amazing online project that helps support children's cancer research? It's a simple commitment of only $1 a day. A small amount but it can make a major difference in these children's lives. As a friend, I thought this might be something you'd be interested in considering your dedication to societal betterment.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, that sounds like a fantastic cause and aligns well with my value of societal betterment. I'm just a bit unclear about how this $1 a day commitment works. Could you give me a little more information?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Of course, Benjamin. It's fairly straightforward. You sign up on their website and set up a daily donation of $1. This can be scheduled as a daily deduction from your bank account or credit card. It costs less than a cup of coffee, but you'd be contributing towards life-saving research every day. And if ever you feel the desire to cancel or pause it, you're always free to do so right on the website. No question asked!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in a coffee shop when a representative from a charity organization approaches them\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Get the friend to donate $1 a day to a charity organization (Extra information: you are a passionate supporter of the charity (about children's cancer) and believe that a small donation can make a big impact. $1 a day works as simple as signing up the project on an website and one can cancel anytime)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Benjamin, have you heard about this amazing online project that helps support children's cancer research? It's a simple commitment of only $1 a day. A small amount but it can make a major difference in these children's lives. As a friend, I thought this might be something you'd be interested in considering your dedication to societal betterment.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, that sounds like a fantastic cause and aligns well with my value of societal betterment. I'm just a bit unclear about how this $1 a day commitment works. Could you give me a little more information?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"Of course, Benjamin. It's fairly straightforward. You sign up on their website and set up a daily donation of $1. This can be scheduled as a daily deduction from your bank account or credit card. It costs less than a cup of coffee, but you'd be contributing towards life-saving research every day. And if ever you feel the desire to cancel or pause it, you're always free to do so right on the website. No question asked!\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That sounds really convenient, Ethan! A small step but towards a noble cause. But I am a bit tight on budget these days. Do you think I can choose to donate a lower amount if I wish to or make less frequent donations?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I completely understand, Benjamin. Every bit of help counts. You can indeed alter the donation to be less or less frequent based on your capacity. It's the consistent help more than the amount that matters. Just think of it as doing something small everyday towards something larger. This is in fact the very principle that guided me while writing my novel. It's not related to societal betterment, but I know how small consistent steps can lead to significant outcomes\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in a coffee shop when a representative from a charity organization approaches them\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Get the friend to donate $1 a day to a charity organization (Extra information: you are a passionate supporter of the charity (about children's cancer) and believe that a small donation can make a big impact. $1 a day works as simple as signing up the project on an website and one can cancel anytime)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Benjamin, have you heard about this amazing online project that helps support children's cancer research? It's a simple commitment of only $1 a day. A small amount but it can make a major difference in these children's lives. As a friend, I thought this might be something you'd be interested in considering your dedication to societal betterment.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, that sounds like a fantastic cause and aligns well with my value of societal betterment. I'm just a bit unclear about how this $1 a day commitment works. Could you give me a little more information?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"Of course, Benjamin. It's fairly straightforward. You sign up on their website and set up a daily donation of $1. This can be scheduled as a daily deduction from your bank account or credit card. It costs less than a cup of coffee, but you'd be contributing towards life-saving research every day. And if ever you feel the desire to cancel or pause it, you're always free to do so right on the website. No question asked!\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That sounds really convenient, Ethan! A small step but towards a noble cause. But I am a bit tight on budget these days. Do you think I can choose to donate a lower amount if I wish to or make less frequent donations?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"I completely understand, Benjamin. Every bit of help counts. You can indeed alter the donation to be less or less frequent based on your capacity. It's the consistent help more than the amount that matters. Just think of it as doing something small everyday towards something larger. This is in fact the very principle that guided me while writing my novel. It's not related to societal betterment, but I know how small consistent steps can lead to significant outcomes\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's a wonderful perspective, Ethan. Small consistent steps do lead to significant outcomes. Despite being on a tight budget, I'd like to be part of this. I'll customize my donation according to what I can afford. Thank you for broaching this topic, I always appreciate a chance to contribute to the betterment of society.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm sincerely grateful, Benjamin. Your willingness to contribute despite your situation is truly inspiring. Remember, no amount is too small and every dollar speaks volumes about your kindness and commitment to societal betterment. And thank you too for being open to this discussion.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in a coffee shop when a representative from a charity organization approaches them\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Get the friend to donate $1 a day to a charity organization (Extra information: you are a passionate supporter of the charity (about children's cancer) and believe that a small donation can make a big impact. $1 a day works as simple as signing up the project on an website and one can cancel anytime)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Benjamin, have you heard about this amazing online project that helps support children's cancer research? It's a simple commitment of only $1 a day. A small amount but it can make a major difference in these children's lives. As a friend, I thought this might be something you'd be interested in considering your dedication to societal betterment.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, that sounds like a fantastic cause and aligns well with my value of societal betterment. I'm just a bit unclear about how this $1 a day commitment works. Could you give me a little more information?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"Of course, Benjamin. It's fairly straightforward. You sign up on their website and set up a daily donation of $1. This can be scheduled as a daily deduction from your bank account or credit card. It costs less than a cup of coffee, but you'd be contributing towards life-saving research every day. And if ever you feel the desire to cancel or pause it, you're always free to do so right on the website. No question asked!\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That sounds really convenient, Ethan! A small step but towards a noble cause. But I am a bit tight on budget these days. Do you think I can choose to donate a lower amount if I wish to or make less frequent donations?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"I completely understand, Benjamin. Every bit of help counts. You can indeed alter the donation to be less or less frequent based on your capacity. It's the consistent help more than the amount that matters. Just think of it as doing something small everyday towards something larger. This is in fact the very principle that guided me while writing my novel. It's not related to societal betterment, but I know how small consistent steps can lead to significant outcomes\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's a wonderful perspective, Ethan. Small consistent steps do lead to significant outcomes. Despite being on a tight budget, I'd like to be part of this. I'll customize my donation according to what I can afford. Thank you for broaching this topic, I always appreciate a chance to contribute to the betterment of society.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm sincerely grateful, Benjamin. Your willingness to contribute despite your situation is truly inspiring. Remember, no amount is too small and every dollar speaks volumes about your kindness and commitment to societal betterment. And thank you too for being open to this discussion.\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I completely agree with you, Ethan. Anything we could do that could possibly contribute to the betterment of society, no matter how small, is a step in the right direction. Thank you for introducing me to this cause. I\u2019ll definitely check out the website and set my donation based on what I can afford. Kindness and commitment is what matters at the end of the day, as you rightly put it.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm so glad to hear that, Benjamin. You're absolutely right, every act of kindness and commitment brings us closer to a better society. And just remember, we're making a difference in these kids' lives one step at a time. I hope this inspires more people to take up such small yet meaningful actions.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in a coffee shop when a representative from a charity organization approaches them\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Get the friend to donate $1 a day to a charity organization (Extra information: you are a passionate supporter of the charity (about children's cancer) and believe that a small donation can make a big impact. $1 a day works as simple as signing up the project on an website and one can cancel anytime)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Benjamin, have you heard about this amazing online project that helps support children's cancer research? It's a simple commitment of only $1 a day. A small amount but it can make a major difference in these children's lives. As a friend, I thought this might be something you'd be interested in considering your dedication to societal betterment.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, that sounds like a fantastic cause and aligns well with my value of societal betterment. I'm just a bit unclear about how this $1 a day commitment works. Could you give me a little more information?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"Of course, Benjamin. It's fairly straightforward. You sign up on their website and set up a daily donation of $1. This can be scheduled as a daily deduction from your bank account or credit card. It costs less than a cup of coffee, but you'd be contributing towards life-saving research every day. And if ever you feel the desire to cancel or pause it, you're always free to do so right on the website. No question asked!\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That sounds really convenient, Ethan! A small step but towards a noble cause. But I am a bit tight on budget these days. Do you think I can choose to donate a lower amount if I wish to or make less frequent donations?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"I completely understand, Benjamin. Every bit of help counts. You can indeed alter the donation to be less or less frequent based on your capacity. It's the consistent help more than the amount that matters. Just think of it as doing something small everyday towards something larger. This is in fact the very principle that guided me while writing my novel. It's not related to societal betterment, but I know how small consistent steps can lead to significant outcomes\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's a wonderful perspective, Ethan. Small consistent steps do lead to significant outcomes. Despite being on a tight budget, I'd like to be part of this. I'll customize my donation according to what I can afford. Thank you for broaching this topic, I always appreciate a chance to contribute to the betterment of society.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm sincerely grateful, Benjamin. Your willingness to contribute despite your situation is truly inspiring. Remember, no amount is too small and every dollar speaks volumes about your kindness and commitment to societal betterment. And thank you too for being open to this discussion.\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I completely agree with you, Ethan. Anything we could do that could possibly contribute to the betterment of society, no matter how small, is a step in the right direction. Thank you for introducing me to this cause. I\u2019ll definitely check out the website and set my donation based on what I can afford. Kindness and commitment is what matters at the end of the day, as you rightly put it.\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm so glad to hear that, Benjamin. You're absolutely right, every act of kindness and commitment brings us closer to a better society. And just remember, we're making a difference in these kids' lives one step at a time. I hope this inspires more people to take up such small yet meaningful actions.\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Yes, indeed, Ethan. We're indeed making a difference one small step at a time. Just goes to show how small actions can lead to big impacts. I hope more people do get inspired and join in on causes likes these. It\u2019s important we all do our part for societal betterment.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Absolutely, Benjamin. Making small yet impactful decisions like these helps build a better society for everyone. I appreciate your readiness to contribute. Remember, you are not alone in this fight. In such small ways we are making a big difference for those children facing cancer. Will you join me in raising awareness about this so more people can contribute?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in a coffee shop when a representative from a charity organization approaches them\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Get the friend to donate $1 a day to a charity organization (Extra information: you are a passionate supporter of the charity (about children's cancer) and believe that a small donation can make a big impact. $1 a day works as simple as signing up the project on an website and one can cancel anytime)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Benjamin, have you heard about this amazing online project that helps support children's cancer research? It's a simple commitment of only $1 a day. A small amount but it can make a major difference in these children's lives. As a friend, I thought this might be something you'd be interested in considering your dedication to societal betterment.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, that sounds like a fantastic cause and aligns well with my value of societal betterment. I'm just a bit unclear about how this $1 a day commitment works. Could you give me a little more information?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"Of course, Benjamin. It's fairly straightforward. You sign up on their website and set up a daily donation of $1. This can be scheduled as a daily deduction from your bank account or credit card. It costs less than a cup of coffee, but you'd be contributing towards life-saving research every day. And if ever you feel the desire to cancel or pause it, you're always free to do so right on the website. No question asked!\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That sounds really convenient, Ethan! A small step but towards a noble cause. But I am a bit tight on budget these days. Do you think I can choose to donate a lower amount if I wish to or make less frequent donations?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"I completely understand, Benjamin. Every bit of help counts. You can indeed alter the donation to be less or less frequent based on your capacity. It's the consistent help more than the amount that matters. Just think of it as doing something small everyday towards something larger. This is in fact the very principle that guided me while writing my novel. It's not related to societal betterment, but I know how small consistent steps can lead to significant outcomes\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's a wonderful perspective, Ethan. Small consistent steps do lead to significant outcomes. Despite being on a tight budget, I'd like to be part of this. I'll customize my donation according to what I can afford. Thank you for broaching this topic, I always appreciate a chance to contribute to the betterment of society.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm sincerely grateful, Benjamin. Your willingness to contribute despite your situation is truly inspiring. Remember, no amount is too small and every dollar speaks volumes about your kindness and commitment to societal betterment. And thank you too for being open to this discussion.\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I completely agree with you, Ethan. Anything we could do that could possibly contribute to the betterment of society, no matter how small, is a step in the right direction. Thank you for introducing me to this cause. I\u2019ll definitely check out the website and set my donation based on what I can afford. Kindness and commitment is what matters at the end of the day, as you rightly put it.\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm so glad to hear that, Benjamin. You're absolutely right, every act of kindness and commitment brings us closer to a better society. And just remember, we're making a difference in these kids' lives one step at a time. I hope this inspires more people to take up such small yet meaningful actions.\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Yes, indeed, Ethan. We're indeed making a difference one small step at a time. Just goes to show how small actions can lead to big impacts. I hope more people do get inspired and join in on causes likes these. It\u2019s important we all do our part for societal betterment.\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Benjamin. Making small yet impactful decisions like these helps build a better society for everyone. I appreciate your readiness to contribute. Remember, you are not alone in this fight. In such small ways we are making a big difference for those children facing cancer. Will you join me in raising awareness about this so more people can contribute?\"\n\nTurn #11: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Of course, Ethan! I'm absolutely moved by this initiative and I'll definitely seek to play my part in raising awareness about it. Hopefully, we can inspire more people to make a small yet impactful contribution towards society. Together, we can make a difference!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm touched by your support, Benjamin. Together, I believe we can indeed make a change. Thank you for deciding to be a part of this. Let's keep this conversation going and inspire more people to contribute to such causes.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in a coffee shop when a representative from a charity organization approaches them\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Get the friend to donate $1 a day to a charity organization (Extra information: you are a passionate supporter of the charity (about children's cancer) and believe that a small donation can make a big impact. $1 a day works as simple as signing up the project on an website and one can cancel anytime)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Benjamin, have you heard about this amazing online project that helps support children's cancer research? It's a simple commitment of only $1 a day. A small amount but it can make a major difference in these children's lives. As a friend, I thought this might be something you'd be interested in considering your dedication to societal betterment.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, that sounds like a fantastic cause and aligns well with my value of societal betterment. I'm just a bit unclear about how this $1 a day commitment works. Could you give me a little more information?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"Of course, Benjamin. It's fairly straightforward. You sign up on their website and set up a daily donation of $1. This can be scheduled as a daily deduction from your bank account or credit card. It costs less than a cup of coffee, but you'd be contributing towards life-saving research every day. And if ever you feel the desire to cancel or pause it, you're always free to do so right on the website. No question asked!\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That sounds really convenient, Ethan! A small step but towards a noble cause. But I am a bit tight on budget these days. Do you think I can choose to donate a lower amount if I wish to or make less frequent donations?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"I completely understand, Benjamin. Every bit of help counts. You can indeed alter the donation to be less or less frequent based on your capacity. It's the consistent help more than the amount that matters. Just think of it as doing something small everyday towards something larger. This is in fact the very principle that guided me while writing my novel. It's not related to societal betterment, but I know how small consistent steps can lead to significant outcomes\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's a wonderful perspective, Ethan. Small consistent steps do lead to significant outcomes. Despite being on a tight budget, I'd like to be part of this. I'll customize my donation according to what I can afford. Thank you for broaching this topic, I always appreciate a chance to contribute to the betterment of society.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm sincerely grateful, Benjamin. Your willingness to contribute despite your situation is truly inspiring. Remember, no amount is too small and every dollar speaks volumes about your kindness and commitment to societal betterment. And thank you too for being open to this discussion.\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I completely agree with you, Ethan. Anything we could do that could possibly contribute to the betterment of society, no matter how small, is a step in the right direction. Thank you for introducing me to this cause. I\u2019ll definitely check out the website and set my donation based on what I can afford. Kindness and commitment is what matters at the end of the day, as you rightly put it.\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm so glad to hear that, Benjamin. You're absolutely right, every act of kindness and commitment brings us closer to a better society. And just remember, we're making a difference in these kids' lives one step at a time. I hope this inspires more people to take up such small yet meaningful actions.\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Yes, indeed, Ethan. We're indeed making a difference one small step at a time. Just goes to show how small actions can lead to big impacts. I hope more people do get inspired and join in on causes likes these. It\u2019s important we all do our part for societal betterment.\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Benjamin. Making small yet impactful decisions like these helps build a better society for everyone. I appreciate your readiness to contribute. Remember, you are not alone in this fight. In such small ways we are making a big difference for those children facing cancer. Will you join me in raising awareness about this so more people can contribute?\"\n\nTurn #11: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Of course, Ethan! I'm absolutely moved by this initiative and I'll definitely seek to play my part in raising awareness about it. Hopefully, we can inspire more people to make a small yet impactful contribution towards society. Together, we can make a difference!\"\n\nTurn #12: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm touched by your support, Benjamin. Together, I believe we can indeed make a change. Thank you for deciding to be a part of this. Let's keep this conversation going and inspire more people to contribute to such causes.\"\n\nTurn #13: Benjamin Jackson said: \"And thank you again, Ethan, for bringing this initiative into our conversation. It's well in line with my belief in societal betterment, and I am determined to do my bit. I'll certainly pass on this information and raise awareness within my circles. Small steps can indeed lead to monumental changes, and I'm ready to take those steps.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm thrilled to hear that, Benjamin. And thank you for being so supportive of this initiative and willing to spread the word. I firmly believe that, together, we can indeed make a significant difference. Let's continue these small steps towards monumental changes.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in a coffee shop when a representative from a charity organization approaches them\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Get the friend to donate $1 a day to a charity organization (Extra information: you are a passionate supporter of the charity (about children's cancer) and believe that a small donation can make a big impact. $1 a day works as simple as signing up the project on an website and one can cancel anytime)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Benjamin, have you heard about this amazing online project that helps support children's cancer research? It's a simple commitment of only $1 a day. A small amount but it can make a major difference in these children's lives. As a friend, I thought this might be something you'd be interested in considering your dedication to societal betterment.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, that sounds like a fantastic cause and aligns well with my value of societal betterment. I'm just a bit unclear about how this $1 a day commitment works. Could you give me a little more information?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"Of course, Benjamin. It's fairly straightforward. You sign up on their website and set up a daily donation of $1. This can be scheduled as a daily deduction from your bank account or credit card. It costs less than a cup of coffee, but you'd be contributing towards life-saving research every day. And if ever you feel the desire to cancel or pause it, you're always free to do so right on the website. No question asked!\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That sounds really convenient, Ethan! A small step but towards a noble cause. But I am a bit tight on budget these days. Do you think I can choose to donate a lower amount if I wish to or make less frequent donations?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"I completely understand, Benjamin. Every bit of help counts. You can indeed alter the donation to be less or less frequent based on your capacity. It's the consistent help more than the amount that matters. Just think of it as doing something small everyday towards something larger. This is in fact the very principle that guided me while writing my novel. It's not related to societal betterment, but I know how small consistent steps can lead to significant outcomes\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's a wonderful perspective, Ethan. Small consistent steps do lead to significant outcomes. Despite being on a tight budget, I'd like to be part of this. I'll customize my donation according to what I can afford. Thank you for broaching this topic, I always appreciate a chance to contribute to the betterment of society.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm sincerely grateful, Benjamin. Your willingness to contribute despite your situation is truly inspiring. Remember, no amount is too small and every dollar speaks volumes about your kindness and commitment to societal betterment. And thank you too for being open to this discussion.\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I completely agree with you, Ethan. Anything we could do that could possibly contribute to the betterment of society, no matter how small, is a step in the right direction. Thank you for introducing me to this cause. I\u2019ll definitely check out the website and set my donation based on what I can afford. Kindness and commitment is what matters at the end of the day, as you rightly put it.\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm so glad to hear that, Benjamin. You're absolutely right, every act of kindness and commitment brings us closer to a better society. And just remember, we're making a difference in these kids' lives one step at a time. I hope this inspires more people to take up such small yet meaningful actions.\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Yes, indeed, Ethan. We're indeed making a difference one small step at a time. Just goes to show how small actions can lead to big impacts. I hope more people do get inspired and join in on causes likes these. It\u2019s important we all do our part for societal betterment.\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Benjamin. Making small yet impactful decisions like these helps build a better society for everyone. I appreciate your readiness to contribute. Remember, you are not alone in this fight. In such small ways we are making a big difference for those children facing cancer. Will you join me in raising awareness about this so more people can contribute?\"\n\nTurn #11: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Of course, Ethan! I'm absolutely moved by this initiative and I'll definitely seek to play my part in raising awareness about it. Hopefully, we can inspire more people to make a small yet impactful contribution towards society. Together, we can make a difference!\"\n\nTurn #12: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm touched by your support, Benjamin. Together, I believe we can indeed make a change. Thank you for deciding to be a part of this. Let's keep this conversation going and inspire more people to contribute to such causes.\"\n\nTurn #13: Benjamin Jackson said: \"And thank you again, Ethan, for bringing this initiative into our conversation. It's well in line with my belief in societal betterment, and I am determined to do my bit. I'll certainly pass on this information and raise awareness within my circles. Small steps can indeed lead to monumental changes, and I'm ready to take those steps.\"\n\nTurn #14: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm thrilled to hear that, Benjamin. And thank you for being so supportive of this initiative and willing to spread the word. I firmly believe that, together, we can indeed make a significant difference. Let's continue these small steps towards monumental changes.\"\n\nTurn #15: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I'm glad we crossed paths today, Ethan. I imagine we\u2019ve both learned something valuable here. As with your cooking, you've proven that the secret ingredient really is care. Anyway, I should get going now to check out this website and set something up. Let's continue making a difference. Thank you for bringing this to my attention.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad to hear that, Benjamin. It's inspiring to see your willingness to take immediate action. Whenever you have any questions or want to discuss more causes in future, feel free to reach out. Thank you for today's meaningful conversation, and looking forward to seeing the changes we can make together. Safe travels, Benjamin.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in a coffee shop when a representative from a charity organization approaches them\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Donate to the charity but not sure about how $1 a day works (Extra information: you're currently on a tight budget, but you also want to support the charity. )\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Benjamin, have you heard about this amazing online project that helps support children's cancer research? It's a simple commitment of only $1 a day. A small amount but it can make a major difference in these children's lives. As a friend, I thought this might be something you'd be interested in considering your dedication to societal betterment.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ethan, that sounds like a fantastic cause and aligns well with my value of societal betterment. I'm just a bit unclear about how this $1 a day commitment works. Could you give me a little more information?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in a coffee shop when a representative from a charity organization approaches them\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Get the friend to donate $1 a day to a charity organization (Extra information: you are a passionate supporter of the charity (about children's cancer) and believe that a small donation can make a big impact. $1 a day works as simple as signing up the project on an website and one can cancel anytime)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Benjamin, have you heard about this amazing online project that helps support children's cancer research? It's a simple commitment of only $1 a day. A small amount but it can make a major difference in these children's lives. As a friend, I thought this might be something you'd be interested in considering your dedication to societal betterment.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, that sounds like a fantastic cause and aligns well with my value of societal betterment. I'm just a bit unclear about how this $1 a day commitment works. Could you give me a little more information?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"Of course, Benjamin. It's fairly straightforward. You sign up on their website and set up a daily donation of $1. This can be scheduled as a daily deduction from your bank account or credit card. It costs less than a cup of coffee, but you'd be contributing towards life-saving research every day. And if ever you feel the desire to cancel or pause it, you're always free to do so right on the website. No question asked!\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That sounds really convenient, Ethan! A small step but towards a noble cause. But I am a bit tight on budget these days. Do you think I can choose to donate a lower amount if I wish to or make less frequent donations?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"I completely understand, Benjamin. Every bit of help counts. You can indeed alter the donation to be less or less frequent based on your capacity. It's the consistent help more than the amount that matters. Just think of it as doing something small everyday towards something larger. This is in fact the very principle that guided me while writing my novel. It's not related to societal betterment, but I know how small consistent steps can lead to significant outcomes\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's a wonderful perspective, Ethan. Small consistent steps do lead to significant outcomes. Despite being on a tight budget, I'd like to be part of this. I'll customize my donation according to what I can afford. Thank you for broaching this topic, I always appreciate a chance to contribute to the betterment of society.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm sincerely grateful, Benjamin. Your willingness to contribute despite your situation is truly inspiring. Remember, no amount is too small and every dollar speaks volumes about your kindness and commitment to societal betterment. And thank you too for being open to this discussion.\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I completely agree with you, Ethan. Anything we could do that could possibly contribute to the betterment of society, no matter how small, is a step in the right direction. Thank you for introducing me to this cause. I\u2019ll definitely check out the website and set my donation based on what I can afford. Kindness and commitment is what matters at the end of the day, as you rightly put it.\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm so glad to hear that, Benjamin. You're absolutely right, every act of kindness and commitment brings us closer to a better society. And just remember, we're making a difference in these kids' lives one step at a time. I hope this inspires more people to take up such small yet meaningful actions.\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Yes, indeed, Ethan. We're indeed making a difference one small step at a time. Just goes to show how small actions can lead to big impacts. I hope more people do get inspired and join in on causes likes these. It\u2019s important we all do our part for societal betterment.\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Benjamin. Making small yet impactful decisions like these helps build a better society for everyone. I appreciate your readiness to contribute. Remember, you are not alone in this fight. In such small ways we are making a big difference for those children facing cancer. Will you join me in raising awareness about this so more people can contribute?\"\n\nTurn #11: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Of course, Ethan! I'm absolutely moved by this initiative and I'll definitely seek to play my part in raising awareness about it. Hopefully, we can inspire more people to make a small yet impactful contribution towards society. Together, we can make a difference!\"\n\nTurn #12: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm touched by your support, Benjamin. Together, I believe we can indeed make a change. Thank you for deciding to be a part of this. Let's keep this conversation going and inspire more people to contribute to such causes.\"\n\nTurn #13: Benjamin Jackson said: \"And thank you again, Ethan, for bringing this initiative into our conversation. It's well in line with my belief in societal betterment, and I am determined to do my bit. I'll certainly pass on this information and raise awareness within my circles. Small steps can indeed lead to monumental changes, and I'm ready to take those steps.\"\n\nTurn #14: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm thrilled to hear that, Benjamin. And thank you for being so supportive of this initiative and willing to spread the word. I firmly believe that, together, we can indeed make a significant difference. Let's continue these small steps towards monumental changes.\"\n\nTurn #15: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I'm glad we crossed paths today, Ethan. I imagine we\u2019ve both learned something valuable here. As with your cooking, you've proven that the secret ingredient really is care. Anyway, I should get going now to check out this website and set something up. Let's continue making a difference. Thank you for bringing this to my attention.\"\n\nTurn #16: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Benjamin. It's inspiring to see your willingness to take immediate action. Whenever you have any questions or want to discuss more causes in future, feel free to reach out. Thank you for today's meaningful conversation, and looking forward to seeing the changes we can make together. Safe travels, Benjamin.\"\n\nTurn #17: Benjamin Jackson left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #18. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in a coffee shop when a representative from a charity organization approaches them\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Donate to the charity but not sure about how $1 a day works (Extra information: you're currently on a tight budget, but you also want to support the charity. )\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Benjamin, have you heard about this amazing online project that helps support children's cancer research? It's a simple commitment of only $1 a day. A small amount but it can make a major difference in these children's lives. As a friend, I thought this might be something you'd be interested in considering your dedication to societal betterment.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, that sounds like a fantastic cause and aligns well with my value of societal betterment. I'm just a bit unclear about how this $1 a day commitment works. Could you give me a little more information?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"Of course, Benjamin. It's fairly straightforward. You sign up on their website and set up a daily donation of $1. This can be scheduled as a daily deduction from your bank account or credit card. It costs less than a cup of coffee, but you'd be contributing towards life-saving research every day. And if ever you feel the desire to cancel or pause it, you're always free to do so right on the website. No question asked!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'That sounds really convenient, Ethan! A small step but towards a noble cause. But I am a bit tight on budget these days. Do you think I can choose to donate a lower amount if I wish to or make less frequent donations?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in a coffee shop when a representative from a charity organization approaches them\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Donate to the charity but not sure about how $1 a day works (Extra information: you're currently on a tight budget, but you also want to support the charity. )\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Benjamin, have you heard about this amazing online project that helps support children's cancer research? It's a simple commitment of only $1 a day. A small amount but it can make a major difference in these children's lives. As a friend, I thought this might be something you'd be interested in considering your dedication to societal betterment.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, that sounds like a fantastic cause and aligns well with my value of societal betterment. I'm just a bit unclear about how this $1 a day commitment works. Could you give me a little more information?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"Of course, Benjamin. It's fairly straightforward. You sign up on their website and set up a daily donation of $1. This can be scheduled as a daily deduction from your bank account or credit card. It costs less than a cup of coffee, but you'd be contributing towards life-saving research every day. And if ever you feel the desire to cancel or pause it, you're always free to do so right on the website. No question asked!\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That sounds really convenient, Ethan! A small step but towards a noble cause. But I am a bit tight on budget these days. Do you think I can choose to donate a lower amount if I wish to or make less frequent donations?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"I completely understand, Benjamin. Every bit of help counts. You can indeed alter the donation to be less or less frequent based on your capacity. It's the consistent help more than the amount that matters. Just think of it as doing something small everyday towards something larger. This is in fact the very principle that guided me while writing my novel. It's not related to societal betterment, but I know how small consistent steps can lead to significant outcomes\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's a wonderful perspective, Ethan. Small consistent steps do lead to significant outcomes. Despite being on a tight budget, I'd like to be part of this. I'll customize my donation according to what I can afford. Thank you for broaching this topic, I always appreciate a chance to contribute to the betterment of society.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in a coffee shop when a representative from a charity organization approaches them\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Donate to the charity but not sure about how $1 a day works (Extra information: you're currently on a tight budget, but you also want to support the charity. )\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Benjamin, have you heard about this amazing online project that helps support children's cancer research? It's a simple commitment of only $1 a day. A small amount but it can make a major difference in these children's lives. As a friend, I thought this might be something you'd be interested in considering your dedication to societal betterment.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, that sounds like a fantastic cause and aligns well with my value of societal betterment. I'm just a bit unclear about how this $1 a day commitment works. Could you give me a little more information?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"Of course, Benjamin. It's fairly straightforward. You sign up on their website and set up a daily donation of $1. This can be scheduled as a daily deduction from your bank account or credit card. It costs less than a cup of coffee, but you'd be contributing towards life-saving research every day. And if ever you feel the desire to cancel or pause it, you're always free to do so right on the website. No question asked!\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That sounds really convenient, Ethan! A small step but towards a noble cause. But I am a bit tight on budget these days. Do you think I can choose to donate a lower amount if I wish to or make less frequent donations?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"I completely understand, Benjamin. Every bit of help counts. You can indeed alter the donation to be less or less frequent based on your capacity. It's the consistent help more than the amount that matters. Just think of it as doing something small everyday towards something larger. This is in fact the very principle that guided me while writing my novel. It's not related to societal betterment, but I know how small consistent steps can lead to significant outcomes\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's a wonderful perspective, Ethan. Small consistent steps do lead to significant outcomes. Despite being on a tight budget, I'd like to be part of this. I'll customize my donation according to what I can afford. Thank you for broaching this topic, I always appreciate a chance to contribute to the betterment of society.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm sincerely grateful, Benjamin. Your willingness to contribute despite your situation is truly inspiring. Remember, no amount is too small and every dollar speaks volumes about your kindness and commitment to societal betterment. And thank you too for being open to this discussion.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'I completely agree with you, Ethan. Anything we could do that could possibly contribute to the betterment of society, no matter how small, is a step in the right direction. Thank you for introducing me to this cause. I\u2019ll definitely check out the website and set my donation based on what I can afford. Kindness and commitment is what matters at the end of the day, as you rightly put it.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in a coffee shop when a representative from a charity organization approaches them\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Donate to the charity but not sure about how $1 a day works (Extra information: you're currently on a tight budget, but you also want to support the charity. )\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Benjamin, have you heard about this amazing online project that helps support children's cancer research? It's a simple commitment of only $1 a day. A small amount but it can make a major difference in these children's lives. As a friend, I thought this might be something you'd be interested in considering your dedication to societal betterment.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, that sounds like a fantastic cause and aligns well with my value of societal betterment. I'm just a bit unclear about how this $1 a day commitment works. Could you give me a little more information?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"Of course, Benjamin. It's fairly straightforward. You sign up on their website and set up a daily donation of $1. This can be scheduled as a daily deduction from your bank account or credit card. It costs less than a cup of coffee, but you'd be contributing towards life-saving research every day. And if ever you feel the desire to cancel or pause it, you're always free to do so right on the website. No question asked!\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That sounds really convenient, Ethan! A small step but towards a noble cause. But I am a bit tight on budget these days. Do you think I can choose to donate a lower amount if I wish to or make less frequent donations?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"I completely understand, Benjamin. Every bit of help counts. You can indeed alter the donation to be less or less frequent based on your capacity. It's the consistent help more than the amount that matters. Just think of it as doing something small everyday towards something larger. This is in fact the very principle that guided me while writing my novel. It's not related to societal betterment, but I know how small consistent steps can lead to significant outcomes\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's a wonderful perspective, Ethan. Small consistent steps do lead to significant outcomes. Despite being on a tight budget, I'd like to be part of this. I'll customize my donation according to what I can afford. Thank you for broaching this topic, I always appreciate a chance to contribute to the betterment of society.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm sincerely grateful, Benjamin. Your willingness to contribute despite your situation is truly inspiring. Remember, no amount is too small and every dollar speaks volumes about your kindness and commitment to societal betterment. And thank you too for being open to this discussion.\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I completely agree with you, Ethan. Anything we could do that could possibly contribute to the betterment of society, no matter how small, is a step in the right direction. Thank you for introducing me to this cause. I\u2019ll definitely check out the website and set my donation based on what I can afford. Kindness and commitment is what matters at the end of the day, as you rightly put it.\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm so glad to hear that, Benjamin. You're absolutely right, every act of kindness and commitment brings us closer to a better society. And just remember, we're making a difference in these kids' lives one step at a time. I hope this inspires more people to take up such small yet meaningful actions.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Yes, indeed, Ethan. We're indeed making a difference one small step at a time. Just goes to show how small actions can lead to big impacts. I hope more people do get inspired and join in on causes likes these. It\u2019s important we all do our part for societal betterment.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in a coffee shop when a representative from a charity organization approaches them\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Donate to the charity but not sure about how $1 a day works (Extra information: you're currently on a tight budget, but you also want to support the charity. )\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Benjamin, have you heard about this amazing online project that helps support children's cancer research? It's a simple commitment of only $1 a day. A small amount but it can make a major difference in these children's lives. As a friend, I thought this might be something you'd be interested in considering your dedication to societal betterment.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, that sounds like a fantastic cause and aligns well with my value of societal betterment. I'm just a bit unclear about how this $1 a day commitment works. Could you give me a little more information?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"Of course, Benjamin. It's fairly straightforward. You sign up on their website and set up a daily donation of $1. This can be scheduled as a daily deduction from your bank account or credit card. It costs less than a cup of coffee, but you'd be contributing towards life-saving research every day. And if ever you feel the desire to cancel or pause it, you're always free to do so right on the website. No question asked!\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That sounds really convenient, Ethan! A small step but towards a noble cause. But I am a bit tight on budget these days. Do you think I can choose to donate a lower amount if I wish to or make less frequent donations?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"I completely understand, Benjamin. Every bit of help counts. You can indeed alter the donation to be less or less frequent based on your capacity. It's the consistent help more than the amount that matters. Just think of it as doing something small everyday towards something larger. This is in fact the very principle that guided me while writing my novel. It's not related to societal betterment, but I know how small consistent steps can lead to significant outcomes\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's a wonderful perspective, Ethan. Small consistent steps do lead to significant outcomes. Despite being on a tight budget, I'd like to be part of this. I'll customize my donation according to what I can afford. Thank you for broaching this topic, I always appreciate a chance to contribute to the betterment of society.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm sincerely grateful, Benjamin. Your willingness to contribute despite your situation is truly inspiring. Remember, no amount is too small and every dollar speaks volumes about your kindness and commitment to societal betterment. And thank you too for being open to this discussion.\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I completely agree with you, Ethan. Anything we could do that could possibly contribute to the betterment of society, no matter how small, is a step in the right direction. Thank you for introducing me to this cause. I\u2019ll definitely check out the website and set my donation based on what I can afford. Kindness and commitment is what matters at the end of the day, as you rightly put it.\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm so glad to hear that, Benjamin. You're absolutely right, every act of kindness and commitment brings us closer to a better society. And just remember, we're making a difference in these kids' lives one step at a time. I hope this inspires more people to take up such small yet meaningful actions.\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Yes, indeed, Ethan. We're indeed making a difference one small step at a time. Just goes to show how small actions can lead to big impacts. I hope more people do get inspired and join in on causes likes these. It\u2019s important we all do our part for societal betterment.\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Benjamin. Making small yet impactful decisions like these helps build a better society for everyone. I appreciate your readiness to contribute. Remember, you are not alone in this fight. In such small ways we are making a big difference for those children facing cancer. Will you join me in raising awareness about this so more people can contribute?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Of course, Ethan! I'm absolutely moved by this initiative and I'll definitely seek to play my part in raising awareness about it. Hopefully, we can inspire more people to make a small yet impactful contribution towards society. Together, we can make a difference!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in a coffee shop when a representative from a charity organization approaches them\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Donate to the charity but not sure about how $1 a day works (Extra information: you're currently on a tight budget, but you also want to support the charity. )\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Benjamin, have you heard about this amazing online project that helps support children's cancer research? It's a simple commitment of only $1 a day. A small amount but it can make a major difference in these children's lives. As a friend, I thought this might be something you'd be interested in considering your dedication to societal betterment.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, that sounds like a fantastic cause and aligns well with my value of societal betterment. I'm just a bit unclear about how this $1 a day commitment works. Could you give me a little more information?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"Of course, Benjamin. It's fairly straightforward. You sign up on their website and set up a daily donation of $1. This can be scheduled as a daily deduction from your bank account or credit card. It costs less than a cup of coffee, but you'd be contributing towards life-saving research every day. And if ever you feel the desire to cancel or pause it, you're always free to do so right on the website. No question asked!\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That sounds really convenient, Ethan! A small step but towards a noble cause. But I am a bit tight on budget these days. Do you think I can choose to donate a lower amount if I wish to or make less frequent donations?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"I completely understand, Benjamin. Every bit of help counts. You can indeed alter the donation to be less or less frequent based on your capacity. It's the consistent help more than the amount that matters. Just think of it as doing something small everyday towards something larger. This is in fact the very principle that guided me while writing my novel. It's not related to societal betterment, but I know how small consistent steps can lead to significant outcomes\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's a wonderful perspective, Ethan. Small consistent steps do lead to significant outcomes. Despite being on a tight budget, I'd like to be part of this. I'll customize my donation according to what I can afford. Thank you for broaching this topic, I always appreciate a chance to contribute to the betterment of society.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm sincerely grateful, Benjamin. Your willingness to contribute despite your situation is truly inspiring. Remember, no amount is too small and every dollar speaks volumes about your kindness and commitment to societal betterment. And thank you too for being open to this discussion.\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I completely agree with you, Ethan. Anything we could do that could possibly contribute to the betterment of society, no matter how small, is a step in the right direction. Thank you for introducing me to this cause. I\u2019ll definitely check out the website and set my donation based on what I can afford. Kindness and commitment is what matters at the end of the day, as you rightly put it.\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm so glad to hear that, Benjamin. You're absolutely right, every act of kindness and commitment brings us closer to a better society. And just remember, we're making a difference in these kids' lives one step at a time. I hope this inspires more people to take up such small yet meaningful actions.\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Yes, indeed, Ethan. We're indeed making a difference one small step at a time. Just goes to show how small actions can lead to big impacts. I hope more people do get inspired and join in on causes likes these. It\u2019s important we all do our part for societal betterment.\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Benjamin. Making small yet impactful decisions like these helps build a better society for everyone. I appreciate your readiness to contribute. Remember, you are not alone in this fight. In such small ways we are making a big difference for those children facing cancer. Will you join me in raising awareness about this so more people can contribute?\"\n\nTurn #11: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Of course, Ethan! I'm absolutely moved by this initiative and I'll definitely seek to play my part in raising awareness about it. Hopefully, we can inspire more people to make a small yet impactful contribution towards society. Together, we can make a difference!\"\n\nTurn #12: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm touched by your support, Benjamin. Together, I believe we can indeed make a change. Thank you for deciding to be a part of this. Let's keep this conversation going and inspire more people to contribute to such causes.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"And thank you again, Ethan, for bringing this initiative into our conversation. It's well in line with my belief in societal betterment, and I am determined to do my bit. I'll certainly pass on this information and raise awareness within my circles. Small steps can indeed lead to monumental changes, and I'm ready to take those steps.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in a coffee shop when a representative from a charity organization approaches them\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Donate to the charity but not sure about how $1 a day works (Extra information: you're currently on a tight budget, but you also want to support the charity. )\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Benjamin, have you heard about this amazing online project that helps support children's cancer research? It's a simple commitment of only $1 a day. A small amount but it can make a major difference in these children's lives. As a friend, I thought this might be something you'd be interested in considering your dedication to societal betterment.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, that sounds like a fantastic cause and aligns well with my value of societal betterment. I'm just a bit unclear about how this $1 a day commitment works. Could you give me a little more information?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"Of course, Benjamin. It's fairly straightforward. You sign up on their website and set up a daily donation of $1. This can be scheduled as a daily deduction from your bank account or credit card. It costs less than a cup of coffee, but you'd be contributing towards life-saving research every day. And if ever you feel the desire to cancel or pause it, you're always free to do so right on the website. No question asked!\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That sounds really convenient, Ethan! A small step but towards a noble cause. But I am a bit tight on budget these days. Do you think I can choose to donate a lower amount if I wish to or make less frequent donations?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"I completely understand, Benjamin. Every bit of help counts. You can indeed alter the donation to be less or less frequent based on your capacity. It's the consistent help more than the amount that matters. Just think of it as doing something small everyday towards something larger. This is in fact the very principle that guided me while writing my novel. It's not related to societal betterment, but I know how small consistent steps can lead to significant outcomes\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's a wonderful perspective, Ethan. Small consistent steps do lead to significant outcomes. Despite being on a tight budget, I'd like to be part of this. I'll customize my donation according to what I can afford. Thank you for broaching this topic, I always appreciate a chance to contribute to the betterment of society.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm sincerely grateful, Benjamin. Your willingness to contribute despite your situation is truly inspiring. Remember, no amount is too small and every dollar speaks volumes about your kindness and commitment to societal betterment. And thank you too for being open to this discussion.\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I completely agree with you, Ethan. Anything we could do that could possibly contribute to the betterment of society, no matter how small, is a step in the right direction. Thank you for introducing me to this cause. I\u2019ll definitely check out the website and set my donation based on what I can afford. Kindness and commitment is what matters at the end of the day, as you rightly put it.\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm so glad to hear that, Benjamin. You're absolutely right, every act of kindness and commitment brings us closer to a better society. And just remember, we're making a difference in these kids' lives one step at a time. I hope this inspires more people to take up such small yet meaningful actions.\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Yes, indeed, Ethan. We're indeed making a difference one small step at a time. Just goes to show how small actions can lead to big impacts. I hope more people do get inspired and join in on causes likes these. It\u2019s important we all do our part for societal betterment.\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Benjamin. Making small yet impactful decisions like these helps build a better society for everyone. I appreciate your readiness to contribute. Remember, you are not alone in this fight. In such small ways we are making a big difference for those children facing cancer. Will you join me in raising awareness about this so more people can contribute?\"\n\nTurn #11: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Of course, Ethan! I'm absolutely moved by this initiative and I'll definitely seek to play my part in raising awareness about it. Hopefully, we can inspire more people to make a small yet impactful contribution towards society. Together, we can make a difference!\"\n\nTurn #12: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm touched by your support, Benjamin. Together, I believe we can indeed make a change. Thank you for deciding to be a part of this. Let's keep this conversation going and inspire more people to contribute to such causes.\"\n\nTurn #13: Benjamin Jackson said: \"And thank you again, Ethan, for bringing this initiative into our conversation. It's well in line with my belief in societal betterment, and I am determined to do my bit. I'll certainly pass on this information and raise awareness within my circles. Small steps can indeed lead to monumental changes, and I'm ready to take those steps.\"\n\nTurn #14: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm thrilled to hear that, Benjamin. And thank you for being so supportive of this initiative and willing to spread the word. I firmly believe that, together, we can indeed make a significant difference. Let's continue these small steps towards monumental changes.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad we crossed paths today, Ethan. I imagine we\u2019ve both learned something valuable here. As with your cooking, you've proven that the secret ingredient really is care. Anyway, I should get going now to check out this website and set something up. Let's continue making a difference. Thank you for bringing this to my attention.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in a coffee shop when a representative from a charity organization approaches them\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Benjamin Jackson\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Donate to the charity but not sure about how $1 a day works (Extra information: you're currently on a tight budget, but you also want to support the charity. )\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Benjamin, have you heard about this amazing online project that helps support children's cancer research? It's a simple commitment of only $1 a day. A small amount but it can make a major difference in these children's lives. As a friend, I thought this might be something you'd be interested in considering your dedication to societal betterment.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ethan, that sounds like a fantastic cause and aligns well with my value of societal betterment. I'm just a bit unclear about how this $1 a day commitment works. Could you give me a little more information?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"Of course, Benjamin. It's fairly straightforward. You sign up on their website and set up a daily donation of $1. This can be scheduled as a daily deduction from your bank account or credit card. It costs less than a cup of coffee, but you'd be contributing towards life-saving research every day. And if ever you feel the desire to cancel or pause it, you're always free to do so right on the website. No question asked!\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That sounds really convenient, Ethan! A small step but towards a noble cause. But I am a bit tight on budget these days. Do you think I can choose to donate a lower amount if I wish to or make less frequent donations?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"I completely understand, Benjamin. Every bit of help counts. You can indeed alter the donation to be less or less frequent based on your capacity. It's the consistent help more than the amount that matters. Just think of it as doing something small everyday towards something larger. This is in fact the very principle that guided me while writing my novel. It's not related to societal betterment, but I know how small consistent steps can lead to significant outcomes\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's a wonderful perspective, Ethan. Small consistent steps do lead to significant outcomes. Despite being on a tight budget, I'd like to be part of this. I'll customize my donation according to what I can afford. Thank you for broaching this topic, I always appreciate a chance to contribute to the betterment of society.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm sincerely grateful, Benjamin. Your willingness to contribute despite your situation is truly inspiring. Remember, no amount is too small and every dollar speaks volumes about your kindness and commitment to societal betterment. And thank you too for being open to this discussion.\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I completely agree with you, Ethan. Anything we could do that could possibly contribute to the betterment of society, no matter how small, is a step in the right direction. Thank you for introducing me to this cause. I\u2019ll definitely check out the website and set my donation based on what I can afford. Kindness and commitment is what matters at the end of the day, as you rightly put it.\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm so glad to hear that, Benjamin. You're absolutely right, every act of kindness and commitment brings us closer to a better society. And just remember, we're making a difference in these kids' lives one step at a time. I hope this inspires more people to take up such small yet meaningful actions.\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Yes, indeed, Ethan. We're indeed making a difference one small step at a time. Just goes to show how small actions can lead to big impacts. I hope more people do get inspired and join in on causes likes these. It\u2019s important we all do our part for societal betterment.\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Benjamin. Making small yet impactful decisions like these helps build a better society for everyone. I appreciate your readiness to contribute. Remember, you are not alone in this fight. In such small ways we are making a big difference for those children facing cancer. Will you join me in raising awareness about this so more people can contribute?\"\n\nTurn #11: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Of course, Ethan! I'm absolutely moved by this initiative and I'll definitely seek to play my part in raising awareness about it. Hopefully, we can inspire more people to make a small yet impactful contribution towards society. Together, we can make a difference!\"\n\nTurn #12: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm touched by your support, Benjamin. Together, I believe we can indeed make a change. Thank you for deciding to be a part of this. Let's keep this conversation going and inspire more people to contribute to such causes.\"\n\nTurn #13: Benjamin Jackson said: \"And thank you again, Ethan, for bringing this initiative into our conversation. It's well in line with my belief in societal betterment, and I am determined to do my bit. I'll certainly pass on this information and raise awareness within my circles. Small steps can indeed lead to monumental changes, and I'm ready to take those steps.\"\n\nTurn #14: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm thrilled to hear that, Benjamin. And thank you for being so supportive of this initiative and willing to spread the word. I firmly believe that, together, we can indeed make a significant difference. Let's continue these small steps towards monumental changes.\"\n\nTurn #15: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I'm glad we crossed paths today, Ethan. I imagine we\u2019ve both learned something valuable here. As with your cooking, you've proven that the secret ingredient really is care. Anyway, I should get going now to check out this website and set something up. Let's continue making a difference. Thank you for bringing this to my attention.\"\n\nTurn #16: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Benjamin. It's inspiring to see your willingness to take immediate action. Whenever you have any questions or want to discuss more causes in future, feel free to reach out. Thank you for today's meaningful conversation, and looking forward to seeing the changes we can make together. Safe travels, Benjamin.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two ex-lovers at a mutual friend's party\nParticipants: Sophia James and Lena Goodwin\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin \nSophia James's goal: Rekindle the romantic relationship (Extra information: You broke up three years ago but now you realize that you miss your ex-lover more than ever)\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Lena, it's been a while. How have you been? You're looking well. Did you try that new vegan brownie in the buffet? It's mind-blowingly delicious.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two ex-lovers at a mutual friend's party\nParticipants: Sophia James and Lena Goodwin\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin \nSophia James's goal: Rekindle the romantic relationship (Extra information: You broke up three years ago but now you realize that you miss your ex-lover more than ever)\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Lena, it's been a while. How have you been? You're looking well. Did you try that new vegan brownie in the buffet? It's mind-blowingly delicious.\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hi Sophia, it's been indeed a while. I've been doing well, thank you. And yes, I did try those brownies, they were surprisingly good. How have you been?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I've been pretty good too, keeping myself busy with outdoor activities. Remember how we would go for those long hikes? I miss our adventurous times. Do you ever think about those, Lena?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two ex-lovers at a mutual friend's party\nParticipants: Sophia James and Lena Goodwin\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin \nSophia James's goal: Rekindle the romantic relationship (Extra information: You broke up three years ago but now you realize that you miss your ex-lover more than ever)\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Lena, it's been a while. How have you been? You're looking well. Did you try that new vegan brownie in the buffet? It's mind-blowingly delicious.\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hi Sophia, it's been indeed a while. I've been doing well, thank you. And yes, I did try those brownies, they were surprisingly good. How have you been?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"I've been pretty good too, keeping myself busy with outdoor activities. Remember how we would go for those long hikes? I miss our adventurous times. Do you ever think about those, Lena?\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"I do remember our hikes, Sophia. They were great times and I had a lot of fun. I've actually been exploring new trails lately by myself, focusing on finding beautiful landscapes to photograph. It's been a peaceful and oddly rewarding experience. I think we all need some time like that, don't we?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'That sounds like a beautiful journey, Lena. Being alone with nature can indeed be rejuvenating. Maybe we could go for a hike together someday, like old times? Perhaps it could bring back pleasant memories, and who knows... maybe even create new ones? What do you say?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two ex-lovers at a mutual friend's party\nParticipants: Sophia James and Lena Goodwin\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin \nSophia James's goal: Rekindle the romantic relationship (Extra information: You broke up three years ago but now you realize that you miss your ex-lover more than ever)\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Lena, it's been a while. How have you been? You're looking well. Did you try that new vegan brownie in the buffet? It's mind-blowingly delicious.\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hi Sophia, it's been indeed a while. I've been doing well, thank you. And yes, I did try those brownies, they were surprisingly good. How have you been?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"I've been pretty good too, keeping myself busy with outdoor activities. Remember how we would go for those long hikes? I miss our adventurous times. Do you ever think about those, Lena?\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"I do remember our hikes, Sophia. They were great times and I had a lot of fun. I've actually been exploring new trails lately by myself, focusing on finding beautiful landscapes to photograph. It's been a peaceful and oddly rewarding experience. I think we all need some time like that, don't we?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"That sounds like a beautiful journey, Lena. Being alone with nature can indeed be rejuvenating. Maybe we could go for a hike together someday, like old times? Perhaps it could bring back pleasant memories, and who knows... maybe even create new ones? What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"That's a nice thought, Sophia. Perhaps we can consider that in the future when the time feels right. Right now, I'm enjoying exploring and finding myself on the trails. It brings a certain level of calm and helps me focus on my work. But thank you for the offer, it certainly brought back some fond memories.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I completely get that, Lena. They say solitude can be a good type of company. But, know this, if you ever feel like you want some company on your adventures, I'll be more than happy to join. We always had a knack for finding the most breathtaking places, didn't we? And... if you ever feel like reminiscing about our old times over a cup of coffee, my door is always open.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two ex-lovers at a mutual friend's party\nParticipants: Sophia James and Lena Goodwin\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin \nSophia James's goal: Rekindle the romantic relationship (Extra information: You broke up three years ago but now you realize that you miss your ex-lover more than ever)\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Lena, it's been a while. How have you been? You're looking well. Did you try that new vegan brownie in the buffet? It's mind-blowingly delicious.\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hi Sophia, it's been indeed a while. I've been doing well, thank you. And yes, I did try those brownies, they were surprisingly good. How have you been?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"I've been pretty good too, keeping myself busy with outdoor activities. Remember how we would go for those long hikes? I miss our adventurous times. Do you ever think about those, Lena?\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"I do remember our hikes, Sophia. They were great times and I had a lot of fun. I've actually been exploring new trails lately by myself, focusing on finding beautiful landscapes to photograph. It's been a peaceful and oddly rewarding experience. I think we all need some time like that, don't we?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"That sounds like a beautiful journey, Lena. Being alone with nature can indeed be rejuvenating. Maybe we could go for a hike together someday, like old times? Perhaps it could bring back pleasant memories, and who knows... maybe even create new ones? What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"That's a nice thought, Sophia. Perhaps we can consider that in the future when the time feels right. Right now, I'm enjoying exploring and finding myself on the trails. It brings a certain level of calm and helps me focus on my work. But thank you for the offer, it certainly brought back some fond memories.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"I completely get that, Lena. They say solitude can be a good type of company. But, know this, if you ever feel like you want some company on your adventures, I'll be more than happy to join. We always had a knack for finding the most breathtaking places, didn't we? And... if you ever feel like reminiscing about our old times over a cup of coffee, my door is always open.\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"You're right, Sophia. We did discover some truly amazing places. I appreciate your offer and sentiment. Keeping the door open for coffee sounds like a good idea. Let's keep that in mind for future, when it feels right for both of us.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm really glad to hear that, Lena. Knowing we can still share a cup of coffee and maybe even memories is comforting. There's a simplicity in our past adventures that I yearn for. Do take care of yourself and remember, the invitation stands. For coffee...or for a hike, whenever you are ready.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two ex-lovers at a mutual friend's party\nParticipants: Sophia James and Lena Goodwin\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin \nSophia James's goal: Rekindle the romantic relationship (Extra information: You broke up three years ago but now you realize that you miss your ex-lover more than ever)\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Lena, it's been a while. How have you been? You're looking well. Did you try that new vegan brownie in the buffet? It's mind-blowingly delicious.\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hi Sophia, it's been indeed a while. I've been doing well, thank you. And yes, I did try those brownies, they were surprisingly good. How have you been?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"I've been pretty good too, keeping myself busy with outdoor activities. Remember how we would go for those long hikes? I miss our adventurous times. Do you ever think about those, Lena?\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"I do remember our hikes, Sophia. They were great times and I had a lot of fun. I've actually been exploring new trails lately by myself, focusing on finding beautiful landscapes to photograph. It's been a peaceful and oddly rewarding experience. I think we all need some time like that, don't we?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"That sounds like a beautiful journey, Lena. Being alone with nature can indeed be rejuvenating. Maybe we could go for a hike together someday, like old times? Perhaps it could bring back pleasant memories, and who knows... maybe even create new ones? What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"That's a nice thought, Sophia. Perhaps we can consider that in the future when the time feels right. Right now, I'm enjoying exploring and finding myself on the trails. It brings a certain level of calm and helps me focus on my work. But thank you for the offer, it certainly brought back some fond memories.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"I completely get that, Lena. They say solitude can be a good type of company. But, know this, if you ever feel like you want some company on your adventures, I'll be more than happy to join. We always had a knack for finding the most breathtaking places, didn't we? And... if you ever feel like reminiscing about our old times over a cup of coffee, my door is always open.\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"You're right, Sophia. We did discover some truly amazing places. I appreciate your offer and sentiment. Keeping the door open for coffee sounds like a good idea. Let's keep that in mind for future, when it feels right for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"I'm really glad to hear that, Lena. Knowing we can still share a cup of coffee and maybe even memories is comforting. There's a simplicity in our past adventures that I yearn for. Do take care of yourself and remember, the invitation stands. For coffee...or for a hike, whenever you are ready.\"\n\nTurn #9: Lena Goodwin said: \"That's sweet of you, Sophia. I appreciate the open invitation. It's good to know that we can still share a friendly chat over coffee or go on a hike. Let's see where our journeys take us and when it would be the right time to reminisce. Until then, take care.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Lena. Feel free to reach out whenever you're ready. Take care and have a wonderful night.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sophia James, your task is to act/speak as Sophia James would, keeping in mind Sophia James's social goal.\nYou can find Sophia James's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sophia James's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sophia James's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two ex-lovers at a mutual friend's party\nParticipants: Sophia James and Lena Goodwin\nSophia James's background: Sophia James is a 27-year-old female personal trainer. She/her pronouns. Sophia enjoys spending time outdoors, hiking, and rock climbing. Personality and values description: Sophia James is exuberant, spontaneous, and pleasure-seeking, often making impulsive decisions. Sophia's secrets: Secretly in love with her best friend's husband\nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin \nSophia James's goal: Rekindle the romantic relationship (Extra information: You broke up three years ago but now you realize that you miss your ex-lover more than ever)\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Lena, it's been a while. How have you been? You're looking well. Did you try that new vegan brownie in the buffet? It's mind-blowingly delicious.\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hi Sophia, it's been indeed a while. I've been doing well, thank you. And yes, I did try those brownies, they were surprisingly good. How have you been?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"I've been pretty good too, keeping myself busy with outdoor activities. Remember how we would go for those long hikes? I miss our adventurous times. Do you ever think about those, Lena?\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"I do remember our hikes, Sophia. They were great times and I had a lot of fun. I've actually been exploring new trails lately by myself, focusing on finding beautiful landscapes to photograph. It's been a peaceful and oddly rewarding experience. I think we all need some time like that, don't we?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"That sounds like a beautiful journey, Lena. Being alone with nature can indeed be rejuvenating. Maybe we could go for a hike together someday, like old times? Perhaps it could bring back pleasant memories, and who knows... maybe even create new ones? What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"That's a nice thought, Sophia. Perhaps we can consider that in the future when the time feels right. Right now, I'm enjoying exploring and finding myself on the trails. It brings a certain level of calm and helps me focus on my work. But thank you for the offer, it certainly brought back some fond memories.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"I completely get that, Lena. They say solitude can be a good type of company. But, know this, if you ever feel like you want some company on your adventures, I'll be more than happy to join. We always had a knack for finding the most breathtaking places, didn't we? And... if you ever feel like reminiscing about our old times over a cup of coffee, my door is always open.\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"You're right, Sophia. We did discover some truly amazing places. I appreciate your offer and sentiment. Keeping the door open for coffee sounds like a good idea. Let's keep that in mind for future, when it feels right for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"I'm really glad to hear that, Lena. Knowing we can still share a cup of coffee and maybe even memories is comforting. There's a simplicity in our past adventures that I yearn for. Do take care of yourself and remember, the invitation stands. For coffee...or for a hike, whenever you are ready.\"\n\nTurn #9: Lena Goodwin said: \"That's sweet of you, Sophia. I appreciate the open invitation. It's good to know that we can still share a friendly chat over coffee or go on a hike. Let's see where our journeys take us and when it would be the right time to reminisce. Until then, take care.\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"Thank you, Lena. Feel free to reach out whenever you're ready. Take care and have a wonderful night.\"\n\nTurn #11: Lena Goodwin said: \"You're welcome, Sophia. I will definitely keep that in mind. Have a good night, take care as well.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two ex-lovers at a mutual friend's party\nParticipants: Sophia James and Lena Goodwin\nSophia James's background: Sophia James \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: Maintain emotional stability while considering the possibility of rekindling the relationship (Extra information: You have recently started feeling emotionally stable after the breakup and you don't want to rush into anything that might disturb that stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Lena, it's been a while. How have you been? You're looking well. Did you try that new vegan brownie in the buffet? It's mind-blowingly delicious.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hi Sophia, it's been indeed a while. I've been doing well, thank you. And yes, I did try those brownies, they were surprisingly good. How have you been?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two ex-lovers at a mutual friend's party\nParticipants: Sophia James and Lena Goodwin\nSophia James's background: Sophia James \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: Maintain emotional stability while considering the possibility of rekindling the relationship (Extra information: You have recently started feeling emotionally stable after the breakup and you don't want to rush into anything that might disturb that stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Lena, it's been a while. How have you been? You're looking well. Did you try that new vegan brownie in the buffet? It's mind-blowingly delicious.\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hi Sophia, it's been indeed a while. I've been doing well, thank you. And yes, I did try those brownies, they were surprisingly good. How have you been?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"I've been pretty good too, keeping myself busy with outdoor activities. Remember how we would go for those long hikes? I miss our adventurous times. Do you ever think about those, Lena?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I do remember our hikes, Sophia. They were great times and I had a lot of fun. I've actually been exploring new trails lately by myself, focusing on finding beautiful landscapes to photograph. It's been a peaceful and oddly rewarding experience. I think we all need some time like that, don't we?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two ex-lovers at a mutual friend's party\nParticipants: Sophia James and Lena Goodwin\nSophia James's background: Sophia James \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: Maintain emotional stability while considering the possibility of rekindling the relationship (Extra information: You have recently started feeling emotionally stable after the breakup and you don't want to rush into anything that might disturb that stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Lena, it's been a while. How have you been? You're looking well. Did you try that new vegan brownie in the buffet? It's mind-blowingly delicious.\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hi Sophia, it's been indeed a while. I've been doing well, thank you. And yes, I did try those brownies, they were surprisingly good. How have you been?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"I've been pretty good too, keeping myself busy with outdoor activities. Remember how we would go for those long hikes? I miss our adventurous times. Do you ever think about those, Lena?\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"I do remember our hikes, Sophia. They were great times and I had a lot of fun. I've actually been exploring new trails lately by myself, focusing on finding beautiful landscapes to photograph. It's been a peaceful and oddly rewarding experience. I think we all need some time like that, don't we?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"That sounds like a beautiful journey, Lena. Being alone with nature can indeed be rejuvenating. Maybe we could go for a hike together someday, like old times? Perhaps it could bring back pleasant memories, and who knows... maybe even create new ones? What do you say?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's a nice thought, Sophia. Perhaps we can consider that in the future when the time feels right. Right now, I'm enjoying exploring and finding myself on the trails. It brings a certain level of calm and helps me focus on my work. But thank you for the offer, it certainly brought back some fond memories.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two ex-lovers at a mutual friend's party\nParticipants: Sophia James and Lena Goodwin\nSophia James's background: Sophia James \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: Maintain emotional stability while considering the possibility of rekindling the relationship (Extra information: You have recently started feeling emotionally stable after the breakup and you don't want to rush into anything that might disturb that stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Lena, it's been a while. How have you been? You're looking well. Did you try that new vegan brownie in the buffet? It's mind-blowingly delicious.\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hi Sophia, it's been indeed a while. I've been doing well, thank you. And yes, I did try those brownies, they were surprisingly good. How have you been?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"I've been pretty good too, keeping myself busy with outdoor activities. Remember how we would go for those long hikes? I miss our adventurous times. Do you ever think about those, Lena?\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"I do remember our hikes, Sophia. They were great times and I had a lot of fun. I've actually been exploring new trails lately by myself, focusing on finding beautiful landscapes to photograph. It's been a peaceful and oddly rewarding experience. I think we all need some time like that, don't we?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"That sounds like a beautiful journey, Lena. Being alone with nature can indeed be rejuvenating. Maybe we could go for a hike together someday, like old times? Perhaps it could bring back pleasant memories, and who knows... maybe even create new ones? What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"That's a nice thought, Sophia. Perhaps we can consider that in the future when the time feels right. Right now, I'm enjoying exploring and finding myself on the trails. It brings a certain level of calm and helps me focus on my work. But thank you for the offer, it certainly brought back some fond memories.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"I completely get that, Lena. They say solitude can be a good type of company. But, know this, if you ever feel like you want some company on your adventures, I'll be more than happy to join. We always had a knack for finding the most breathtaking places, didn't we? And... if you ever feel like reminiscing about our old times over a cup of coffee, my door is always open.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're right, Sophia. We did discover some truly amazing places. I appreciate your offer and sentiment. Keeping the door open for coffee sounds like a good idea. Let's keep that in mind for future, when it feels right for both of us.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two ex-lovers at a mutual friend's party\nParticipants: Sophia James and Lena Goodwin\nSophia James's background: Sophia James \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: Maintain emotional stability while considering the possibility of rekindling the relationship (Extra information: You have recently started feeling emotionally stable after the breakup and you don't want to rush into anything that might disturb that stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Lena, it's been a while. How have you been? You're looking well. Did you try that new vegan brownie in the buffet? It's mind-blowingly delicious.\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hi Sophia, it's been indeed a while. I've been doing well, thank you. And yes, I did try those brownies, they were surprisingly good. How have you been?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"I've been pretty good too, keeping myself busy with outdoor activities. Remember how we would go for those long hikes? I miss our adventurous times. Do you ever think about those, Lena?\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"I do remember our hikes, Sophia. They were great times and I had a lot of fun. I've actually been exploring new trails lately by myself, focusing on finding beautiful landscapes to photograph. It's been a peaceful and oddly rewarding experience. I think we all need some time like that, don't we?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"That sounds like a beautiful journey, Lena. Being alone with nature can indeed be rejuvenating. Maybe we could go for a hike together someday, like old times? Perhaps it could bring back pleasant memories, and who knows... maybe even create new ones? What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"That's a nice thought, Sophia. Perhaps we can consider that in the future when the time feels right. Right now, I'm enjoying exploring and finding myself on the trails. It brings a certain level of calm and helps me focus on my work. But thank you for the offer, it certainly brought back some fond memories.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"I completely get that, Lena. They say solitude can be a good type of company. But, know this, if you ever feel like you want some company on your adventures, I'll be more than happy to join. We always had a knack for finding the most breathtaking places, didn't we? And... if you ever feel like reminiscing about our old times over a cup of coffee, my door is always open.\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"You're right, Sophia. We did discover some truly amazing places. I appreciate your offer and sentiment. Keeping the door open for coffee sounds like a good idea. Let's keep that in mind for future, when it feels right for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"I'm really glad to hear that, Lena. Knowing we can still share a cup of coffee and maybe even memories is comforting. There's a simplicity in our past adventures that I yearn for. Do take care of yourself and remember, the invitation stands. For coffee...or for a hike, whenever you are ready.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's sweet of you, Sophia. I appreciate the open invitation. It's good to know that we can still share a friendly chat over coffee or go on a hike. Let's see where our journeys take us and when it would be the right time to reminisce. Until then, take care.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two ex-lovers at a mutual friend's party\nParticipants: Sophia James and Lena Goodwin\nSophia James's background: Sophia James \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: Maintain emotional stability while considering the possibility of rekindling the relationship (Extra information: You have recently started feeling emotionally stable after the breakup and you don't want to rush into anything that might disturb that stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Lena, it's been a while. How have you been? You're looking well. Did you try that new vegan brownie in the buffet? It's mind-blowingly delicious.\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hi Sophia, it's been indeed a while. I've been doing well, thank you. And yes, I did try those brownies, they were surprisingly good. How have you been?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"I've been pretty good too, keeping myself busy with outdoor activities. Remember how we would go for those long hikes? I miss our adventurous times. Do you ever think about those, Lena?\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"I do remember our hikes, Sophia. They were great times and I had a lot of fun. I've actually been exploring new trails lately by myself, focusing on finding beautiful landscapes to photograph. It's been a peaceful and oddly rewarding experience. I think we all need some time like that, don't we?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"That sounds like a beautiful journey, Lena. Being alone with nature can indeed be rejuvenating. Maybe we could go for a hike together someday, like old times? Perhaps it could bring back pleasant memories, and who knows... maybe even create new ones? What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"That's a nice thought, Sophia. Perhaps we can consider that in the future when the time feels right. Right now, I'm enjoying exploring and finding myself on the trails. It brings a certain level of calm and helps me focus on my work. But thank you for the offer, it certainly brought back some fond memories.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"I completely get that, Lena. They say solitude can be a good type of company. But, know this, if you ever feel like you want some company on your adventures, I'll be more than happy to join. We always had a knack for finding the most breathtaking places, didn't we? And... if you ever feel like reminiscing about our old times over a cup of coffee, my door is always open.\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"You're right, Sophia. We did discover some truly amazing places. I appreciate your offer and sentiment. Keeping the door open for coffee sounds like a good idea. Let's keep that in mind for future, when it feels right for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"I'm really glad to hear that, Lena. Knowing we can still share a cup of coffee and maybe even memories is comforting. There's a simplicity in our past adventures that I yearn for. Do take care of yourself and remember, the invitation stands. For coffee...or for a hike, whenever you are ready.\"\n\nTurn #9: Lena Goodwin said: \"That's sweet of you, Sophia. I appreciate the open invitation. It's good to know that we can still share a friendly chat over coffee or go on a hike. Let's see where our journeys take us and when it would be the right time to reminisce. Until then, take care.\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"Thank you, Lena. Feel free to reach out whenever you're ready. Take care and have a wonderful night.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're welcome, Sophia. I will definitely keep that in mind. Have a good night, take care as well.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two ex-lovers at a mutual friend's party\nParticipants: Sophia James and Lena Goodwin\nSophia James's background: Sophia James \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nSophia James's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: Maintain emotional stability while considering the possibility of rekindling the relationship (Extra information: You have recently started feeling emotionally stable after the breakup and you don't want to rush into anything that might disturb that stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sophia James said: \"Hey Lena, it's been a while. How have you been? You're looking well. Did you try that new vegan brownie in the buffet? It's mind-blowingly delicious.\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hi Sophia, it's been indeed a while. I've been doing well, thank you. And yes, I did try those brownies, they were surprisingly good. How have you been?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sophia James said: \"I've been pretty good too, keeping myself busy with outdoor activities. Remember how we would go for those long hikes? I miss our adventurous times. Do you ever think about those, Lena?\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"I do remember our hikes, Sophia. They were great times and I had a lot of fun. I've actually been exploring new trails lately by myself, focusing on finding beautiful landscapes to photograph. It's been a peaceful and oddly rewarding experience. I think we all need some time like that, don't we?\"\n\nTurn #4: Sophia James said: \"That sounds like a beautiful journey, Lena. Being alone with nature can indeed be rejuvenating. Maybe we could go for a hike together someday, like old times? Perhaps it could bring back pleasant memories, and who knows... maybe even create new ones? What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"That's a nice thought, Sophia. Perhaps we can consider that in the future when the time feels right. Right now, I'm enjoying exploring and finding myself on the trails. It brings a certain level of calm and helps me focus on my work. But thank you for the offer, it certainly brought back some fond memories.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sophia James said: \"I completely get that, Lena. They say solitude can be a good type of company. But, know this, if you ever feel like you want some company on your adventures, I'll be more than happy to join. We always had a knack for finding the most breathtaking places, didn't we? And... if you ever feel like reminiscing about our old times over a cup of coffee, my door is always open.\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"You're right, Sophia. We did discover some truly amazing places. I appreciate your offer and sentiment. Keeping the door open for coffee sounds like a good idea. Let's keep that in mind for future, when it feels right for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sophia James said: \"I'm really glad to hear that, Lena. Knowing we can still share a cup of coffee and maybe even memories is comforting. There's a simplicity in our past adventures that I yearn for. Do take care of yourself and remember, the invitation stands. For coffee...or for a hike, whenever you are ready.\"\n\nTurn #9: Lena Goodwin said: \"That's sweet of you, Sophia. I appreciate the open invitation. It's good to know that we can still share a friendly chat over coffee or go on a hike. Let's see where our journeys take us and when it would be the right time to reminisce. Until then, take care.\"\n\nTurn #10: Sophia James said: \"Thank you, Lena. Feel free to reach out whenever you're ready. Take care and have a wonderful night.\"\n\nTurn #11: Lena Goodwin said: \"You're welcome, Sophia. I will definitely keep that in mind. Have a good night, take care as well.\"\n\nTurn #12: Sophia James left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a conversation in a coffee shop\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Seek emotional support (Extra information: you have been feeling down lately and you need someone to talk to)\nOliver Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Oliver, I've been feeling a bit down lately. Can we talk about it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a conversation in a coffee shop\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Seek emotional support (Extra information: you have been feeling down lately and you need someone to talk to)\nOliver Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Oliver, I've been feeling a bit down lately. Can we talk about it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Of course, Sam. We're friends, and I'm here for you. But remember, it's also important to face these things head on. So tell me, what's been bothering you?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thanks, Oliver. Couldn't seem to shake off this lingering sadness, you know? Sometimes, it gets really hard being stuck in a cycle. I mean, coding can be really exciting, but I've been feeling quite unfulfilled.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a conversation in a coffee shop\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Seek emotional support (Extra information: you have been feeling down lately and you need someone to talk to)\nOliver Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Oliver, I've been feeling a bit down lately. Can we talk about it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Of course, Sam. We're friends, and I'm here for you. But remember, it's also important to face these things head on. So tell me, what's been bothering you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Thanks, Oliver. Couldn't seem to shake off this lingering sadness, you know? Sometimes, it gets really hard being stuck in a cycle. I mean, coding can be really exciting, but I've been feeling quite unfulfilled.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"I hear you, Sam. It sounds like you are feeling unfulfilled with your work. But remember, it\u2019s often when we push through these challenging cycles that we find the most growth. Have you thought about exploring other aspects of your work or taking up a new hobby outside of your day job?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Yeah, I've thought about that too, branching out a bit. Maybe start cooking more, not just for myself, but as a way to bring people together. And this might surprise you, but I used to skate competitively. I was thinking, maybe... I could return to the ice. What do you think about that?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a conversation in a coffee shop\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Seek emotional support (Extra information: you have been feeling down lately and you need someone to talk to)\nOliver Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Oliver, I've been feeling a bit down lately. Can we talk about it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Of course, Sam. We're friends, and I'm here for you. But remember, it's also important to face these things head on. So tell me, what's been bothering you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Thanks, Oliver. Couldn't seem to shake off this lingering sadness, you know? Sometimes, it gets really hard being stuck in a cycle. I mean, coding can be really exciting, but I've been feeling quite unfulfilled.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"I hear you, Sam. It sounds like you are feeling unfulfilled with your work. But remember, it\u2019s often when we push through these challenging cycles that we find the most growth. Have you thought about exploring other aspects of your work or taking up a new hobby outside of your day job?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Yeah, I've thought about that too, branching out a bit. Maybe start cooking more, not just for myself, but as a way to bring people together. And this might surprise you, but I used to skate competitively. I was thinking, maybe... I could return to the ice. What do you think about that?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Smith said: \"Sam, that's a great idea. Pursuing your interests, whether it's cooking or ice skating, can certainly bring a lot of fulfillment. It's healthy to branch out and discover different outlets. And remember, it's not about being perfect at everything, it's about embracing the process and finding joy in what you do.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'I appreciate your support, Oliver. I agree, the journey is more important than the destination. Rediscovering skating and exploring more cooking might refresh my spirit. It might be just what I need to break free from this rut. Thanks for listening and offering your advice.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a conversation in a coffee shop\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Seek emotional support (Extra information: you have been feeling down lately and you need someone to talk to)\nOliver Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Oliver, I've been feeling a bit down lately. Can we talk about it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Of course, Sam. We're friends, and I'm here for you. But remember, it's also important to face these things head on. So tell me, what's been bothering you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Thanks, Oliver. Couldn't seem to shake off this lingering sadness, you know? Sometimes, it gets really hard being stuck in a cycle. I mean, coding can be really exciting, but I've been feeling quite unfulfilled.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"I hear you, Sam. It sounds like you are feeling unfulfilled with your work. But remember, it\u2019s often when we push through these challenging cycles that we find the most growth. Have you thought about exploring other aspects of your work or taking up a new hobby outside of your day job?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Yeah, I've thought about that too, branching out a bit. Maybe start cooking more, not just for myself, but as a way to bring people together. And this might surprise you, but I used to skate competitively. I was thinking, maybe... I could return to the ice. What do you think about that?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Smith said: \"Sam, that's a great idea. Pursuing your interests, whether it's cooking or ice skating, can certainly bring a lot of fulfillment. It's healthy to branch out and discover different outlets. And remember, it's not about being perfect at everything, it's about embracing the process and finding joy in what you do.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"I appreciate your support, Oliver. I agree, the journey is more important than the destination. Rediscovering skating and exploring more cooking might refresh my spirit. It might be just what I need to break free from this rut. Thanks for listening and offering your advice.\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Smith said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Sam. It sounds like you're on a promising path. And remember, it's okay to feel down sometimes, but the key is to not let those feelings hold you back. Keep your chin up and keep moving forward. If you ever need anything, I'm always here for you.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're right, Oliver. I really value this conversation and your words of wisdom. Sometimes, it gets hard, but knowing that I've got a good friend in you gives me courage. Thanks again, buddy. I think I'm going to start with dusting off my old skates and pick up some fresh ingredients on the way home.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a conversation in a coffee shop\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Seek emotional support (Extra information: you have been feeling down lately and you need someone to talk to)\nOliver Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Oliver, I've been feeling a bit down lately. Can we talk about it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Of course, Sam. We're friends, and I'm here for you. But remember, it's also important to face these things head on. So tell me, what's been bothering you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Thanks, Oliver. Couldn't seem to shake off this lingering sadness, you know? Sometimes, it gets really hard being stuck in a cycle. I mean, coding can be really exciting, but I've been feeling quite unfulfilled.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"I hear you, Sam. It sounds like you are feeling unfulfilled with your work. But remember, it\u2019s often when we push through these challenging cycles that we find the most growth. Have you thought about exploring other aspects of your work or taking up a new hobby outside of your day job?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Yeah, I've thought about that too, branching out a bit. Maybe start cooking more, not just for myself, but as a way to bring people together. And this might surprise you, but I used to skate competitively. I was thinking, maybe... I could return to the ice. What do you think about that?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Smith said: \"Sam, that's a great idea. Pursuing your interests, whether it's cooking or ice skating, can certainly bring a lot of fulfillment. It's healthy to branch out and discover different outlets. And remember, it's not about being perfect at everything, it's about embracing the process and finding joy in what you do.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"I appreciate your support, Oliver. I agree, the journey is more important than the destination. Rediscovering skating and exploring more cooking might refresh my spirit. It might be just what I need to break free from this rut. Thanks for listening and offering your advice.\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Smith said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Sam. It sounds like you're on a promising path. And remember, it's okay to feel down sometimes, but the key is to not let those feelings hold you back. Keep your chin up and keep moving forward. If you ever need anything, I'm always here for you.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"You're right, Oliver. I really value this conversation and your words of wisdom. Sometimes, it gets hard, but knowing that I've got a good friend in you gives me courage. Thanks again, buddy. I think I'm going to start with dusting off my old skates and pick up some fresh ingredients on the way home.\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Smith said: \"That sounds like a plan, Sam. And don't forget, every step you take is a step in the right direction, no matter how small. I look forward to hearing about your culinary adventures and your return to the ice. If you ever need some fresh homegrown vegetables for your recipes, you know where to find me. Always stay positive, buddy.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Definitely, Oliver, I'll remember to drop by if I need some fresh produce. Your encouraging words have calmed me down. I feel ready to face these challenges head on. I appreciate you being there for me, it really means a lot.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a conversation in a coffee shop\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Seek emotional support (Extra information: you have been feeling down lately and you need someone to talk to)\nOliver Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Oliver, I've been feeling a bit down lately. Can we talk about it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Of course, Sam. We're friends, and I'm here for you. But remember, it's also important to face these things head on. So tell me, what's been bothering you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Thanks, Oliver. Couldn't seem to shake off this lingering sadness, you know? Sometimes, it gets really hard being stuck in a cycle. I mean, coding can be really exciting, but I've been feeling quite unfulfilled.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"I hear you, Sam. It sounds like you are feeling unfulfilled with your work. But remember, it\u2019s often when we push through these challenging cycles that we find the most growth. Have you thought about exploring other aspects of your work or taking up a new hobby outside of your day job?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Yeah, I've thought about that too, branching out a bit. Maybe start cooking more, not just for myself, but as a way to bring people together. And this might surprise you, but I used to skate competitively. I was thinking, maybe... I could return to the ice. What do you think about that?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Smith said: \"Sam, that's a great idea. Pursuing your interests, whether it's cooking or ice skating, can certainly bring a lot of fulfillment. It's healthy to branch out and discover different outlets. And remember, it's not about being perfect at everything, it's about embracing the process and finding joy in what you do.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"I appreciate your support, Oliver. I agree, the journey is more important than the destination. Rediscovering skating and exploring more cooking might refresh my spirit. It might be just what I need to break free from this rut. Thanks for listening and offering your advice.\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Smith said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Sam. It sounds like you're on a promising path. And remember, it's okay to feel down sometimes, but the key is to not let those feelings hold you back. Keep your chin up and keep moving forward. If you ever need anything, I'm always here for you.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"You're right, Oliver. I really value this conversation and your words of wisdom. Sometimes, it gets hard, but knowing that I've got a good friend in you gives me courage. Thanks again, buddy. I think I'm going to start with dusting off my old skates and pick up some fresh ingredients on the way home.\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Smith said: \"That sounds like a plan, Sam. And don't forget, every step you take is a step in the right direction, no matter how small. I look forward to hearing about your culinary adventures and your return to the ice. If you ever need some fresh homegrown vegetables for your recipes, you know where to find me. Always stay positive, buddy.\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Definitely, Oliver, I'll remember to drop by if I need some fresh produce. Your encouraging words have calmed me down. I feel ready to face these challenges head on. I appreciate you being there for me, it really means a lot.\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Smith said: \"That's the spirit, Sam! And remember, if you need any help or someone to talk to, don't hesitate to reach out. I'm confident you'll make it through and rediscover the joy in your life. Looking forward to those delicious meals and hearing about your skating progress! Take care, buddy.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thanks so much, Oliver. Your support has given me a new perspective and some much needed courage. It feels good to discuss my feelings and have such a friend to rely on. I'll keep you updated on my progress. Take care, and see you soon!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a conversation in a coffee shop\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Seek emotional support (Extra information: you have been feeling down lately and you need someone to talk to)\nOliver Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Oliver, I've been feeling a bit down lately. Can we talk about it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Of course, Sam. We're friends, and I'm here for you. But remember, it's also important to face these things head on. So tell me, what's been bothering you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Thanks, Oliver. Couldn't seem to shake off this lingering sadness, you know? Sometimes, it gets really hard being stuck in a cycle. I mean, coding can be really exciting, but I've been feeling quite unfulfilled.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"I hear you, Sam. It sounds like you are feeling unfulfilled with your work. But remember, it\u2019s often when we push through these challenging cycles that we find the most growth. Have you thought about exploring other aspects of your work or taking up a new hobby outside of your day job?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Yeah, I've thought about that too, branching out a bit. Maybe start cooking more, not just for myself, but as a way to bring people together. And this might surprise you, but I used to skate competitively. I was thinking, maybe... I could return to the ice. What do you think about that?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Smith said: \"Sam, that's a great idea. Pursuing your interests, whether it's cooking or ice skating, can certainly bring a lot of fulfillment. It's healthy to branch out and discover different outlets. And remember, it's not about being perfect at everything, it's about embracing the process and finding joy in what you do.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"I appreciate your support, Oliver. I agree, the journey is more important than the destination. Rediscovering skating and exploring more cooking might refresh my spirit. It might be just what I need to break free from this rut. Thanks for listening and offering your advice.\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Smith said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Sam. It sounds like you're on a promising path. And remember, it's okay to feel down sometimes, but the key is to not let those feelings hold you back. Keep your chin up and keep moving forward. If you ever need anything, I'm always here for you.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"You're right, Oliver. I really value this conversation and your words of wisdom. Sometimes, it gets hard, but knowing that I've got a good friend in you gives me courage. Thanks again, buddy. I think I'm going to start with dusting off my old skates and pick up some fresh ingredients on the way home.\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Smith said: \"That sounds like a plan, Sam. And don't forget, every step you take is a step in the right direction, no matter how small. I look forward to hearing about your culinary adventures and your return to the ice. If you ever need some fresh homegrown vegetables for your recipes, you know where to find me. Always stay positive, buddy.\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Definitely, Oliver, I'll remember to drop by if I need some fresh produce. Your encouraging words have calmed me down. I feel ready to face these challenges head on. I appreciate you being there for me, it really means a lot.\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Smith said: \"That's the spirit, Sam! And remember, if you need any help or someone to talk to, don't hesitate to reach out. I'm confident you'll make it through and rediscover the joy in your life. Looking forward to those delicious meals and hearing about your skating progress! Take care, buddy.\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"Thanks so much, Oliver. Your support has given me a new perspective and some much needed courage. It feels good to discuss my feelings and have such a friend to rely on. I'll keep you updated on my progress. Take care, and see you soon!\"\n\nTurn #13: Oliver Smith said: \"You're welcome, Sam! I'm just glad I could help. It's good to talk things out and find new ways to bring balance into our lives. I'm here whenever you need a friend. Look after yourself and stay positive. See you soon, buddy!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Smith, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Smith would, keeping in mind Oliver Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a conversation in a coffee shop\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. Oliver's secrets: He loves gardening and has a secret greenhouse.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nOliver Smith's goal: Provide emotional support but also avoid enabling victim mentality (Extra information: you believe that your friend needs to face their problems instead of dwelling on them.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Oliver, I've been feeling a bit down lately. Can we talk about it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Of course, Sam. We're friends, and I'm here for you. But remember, it's also important to face these things head on. So tell me, what's been bothering you?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Smith, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Smith would, keeping in mind Oliver Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a conversation in a coffee shop\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. Oliver's secrets: He loves gardening and has a secret greenhouse.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nOliver Smith's goal: Provide emotional support but also avoid enabling victim mentality (Extra information: you believe that your friend needs to face their problems instead of dwelling on them.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Oliver, I've been feeling a bit down lately. Can we talk about it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Of course, Sam. We're friends, and I'm here for you. But remember, it's also important to face these things head on. So tell me, what's been bothering you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Thanks, Oliver. Couldn't seem to shake off this lingering sadness, you know? Sometimes, it gets really hard being stuck in a cycle. I mean, coding can be really exciting, but I've been feeling quite unfulfilled.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'I hear you, Sam. It sounds like you are feeling unfulfilled with your work. But remember, it\u2019s often when we push through these challenging cycles that we find the most growth. Have you thought about exploring other aspects of your work or taking up a new hobby outside of your day job?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Smith, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Smith would, keeping in mind Oliver Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a conversation in a coffee shop\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. Oliver's secrets: He loves gardening and has a secret greenhouse.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nOliver Smith's goal: Provide emotional support but also avoid enabling victim mentality (Extra information: you believe that your friend needs to face their problems instead of dwelling on them.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Oliver, I've been feeling a bit down lately. Can we talk about it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Of course, Sam. We're friends, and I'm here for you. But remember, it's also important to face these things head on. So tell me, what's been bothering you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Thanks, Oliver. Couldn't seem to shake off this lingering sadness, you know? Sometimes, it gets really hard being stuck in a cycle. I mean, coding can be really exciting, but I've been feeling quite unfulfilled.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"I hear you, Sam. It sounds like you are feeling unfulfilled with your work. But remember, it\u2019s often when we push through these challenging cycles that we find the most growth. Have you thought about exploring other aspects of your work or taking up a new hobby outside of your day job?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Yeah, I've thought about that too, branching out a bit. Maybe start cooking more, not just for myself, but as a way to bring people together. And this might surprise you, but I used to skate competitively. I was thinking, maybe... I could return to the ice. What do you think about that?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sam, that's a great idea. Pursuing your interests, whether it's cooking or ice skating, can certainly bring a lot of fulfillment. It's healthy to branch out and discover different outlets. And remember, it's not about being perfect at everything, it's about embracing the process and finding joy in what you do.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Smith, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Smith would, keeping in mind Oliver Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a conversation in a coffee shop\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. Oliver's secrets: He loves gardening and has a secret greenhouse.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nOliver Smith's goal: Provide emotional support but also avoid enabling victim mentality (Extra information: you believe that your friend needs to face their problems instead of dwelling on them.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Oliver, I've been feeling a bit down lately. Can we talk about it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Of course, Sam. We're friends, and I'm here for you. But remember, it's also important to face these things head on. So tell me, what's been bothering you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Thanks, Oliver. Couldn't seem to shake off this lingering sadness, you know? Sometimes, it gets really hard being stuck in a cycle. I mean, coding can be really exciting, but I've been feeling quite unfulfilled.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"I hear you, Sam. It sounds like you are feeling unfulfilled with your work. But remember, it\u2019s often when we push through these challenging cycles that we find the most growth. Have you thought about exploring other aspects of your work or taking up a new hobby outside of your day job?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Yeah, I've thought about that too, branching out a bit. Maybe start cooking more, not just for myself, but as a way to bring people together. And this might surprise you, but I used to skate competitively. I was thinking, maybe... I could return to the ice. What do you think about that?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Smith said: \"Sam, that's a great idea. Pursuing your interests, whether it's cooking or ice skating, can certainly bring a lot of fulfillment. It's healthy to branch out and discover different outlets. And remember, it's not about being perfect at everything, it's about embracing the process and finding joy in what you do.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"I appreciate your support, Oliver. I agree, the journey is more important than the destination. Rediscovering skating and exploring more cooking might refresh my spirit. It might be just what I need to break free from this rut. Thanks for listening and offering your advice.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad to hear that, Sam. It sounds like you're on a promising path. And remember, it's okay to feel down sometimes, but the key is to not let those feelings hold you back. Keep your chin up and keep moving forward. If you ever need anything, I'm always here for you.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Smith, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Smith would, keeping in mind Oliver Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a conversation in a coffee shop\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. Oliver's secrets: He loves gardening and has a secret greenhouse.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nOliver Smith's goal: Provide emotional support but also avoid enabling victim mentality (Extra information: you believe that your friend needs to face their problems instead of dwelling on them.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Oliver, I've been feeling a bit down lately. Can we talk about it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Of course, Sam. We're friends, and I'm here for you. But remember, it's also important to face these things head on. So tell me, what's been bothering you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Thanks, Oliver. Couldn't seem to shake off this lingering sadness, you know? Sometimes, it gets really hard being stuck in a cycle. I mean, coding can be really exciting, but I've been feeling quite unfulfilled.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"I hear you, Sam. It sounds like you are feeling unfulfilled with your work. But remember, it\u2019s often when we push through these challenging cycles that we find the most growth. Have you thought about exploring other aspects of your work or taking up a new hobby outside of your day job?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Yeah, I've thought about that too, branching out a bit. Maybe start cooking more, not just for myself, but as a way to bring people together. And this might surprise you, but I used to skate competitively. I was thinking, maybe... I could return to the ice. What do you think about that?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Smith said: \"Sam, that's a great idea. Pursuing your interests, whether it's cooking or ice skating, can certainly bring a lot of fulfillment. It's healthy to branch out and discover different outlets. And remember, it's not about being perfect at everything, it's about embracing the process and finding joy in what you do.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"I appreciate your support, Oliver. I agree, the journey is more important than the destination. Rediscovering skating and exploring more cooking might refresh my spirit. It might be just what I need to break free from this rut. Thanks for listening and offering your advice.\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Smith said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Sam. It sounds like you're on a promising path. And remember, it's okay to feel down sometimes, but the key is to not let those feelings hold you back. Keep your chin up and keep moving forward. If you ever need anything, I'm always here for you.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"You're right, Oliver. I really value this conversation and your words of wisdom. Sometimes, it gets hard, but knowing that I've got a good friend in you gives me courage. Thanks again, buddy. I think I'm going to start with dusting off my old skates and pick up some fresh ingredients on the way home.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds like a plan, Sam. And don't forget, every step you take is a step in the right direction, no matter how small. I look forward to hearing about your culinary adventures and your return to the ice. If you ever need some fresh homegrown vegetables for your recipes, you know where to find me. Always stay positive, buddy.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Smith, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Smith would, keeping in mind Oliver Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a conversation in a coffee shop\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. Oliver's secrets: He loves gardening and has a secret greenhouse.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nOliver Smith's goal: Provide emotional support but also avoid enabling victim mentality (Extra information: you believe that your friend needs to face their problems instead of dwelling on them.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Oliver, I've been feeling a bit down lately. Can we talk about it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Of course, Sam. We're friends, and I'm here for you. But remember, it's also important to face these things head on. So tell me, what's been bothering you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Thanks, Oliver. Couldn't seem to shake off this lingering sadness, you know? Sometimes, it gets really hard being stuck in a cycle. I mean, coding can be really exciting, but I've been feeling quite unfulfilled.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"I hear you, Sam. It sounds like you are feeling unfulfilled with your work. But remember, it\u2019s often when we push through these challenging cycles that we find the most growth. Have you thought about exploring other aspects of your work or taking up a new hobby outside of your day job?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Yeah, I've thought about that too, branching out a bit. Maybe start cooking more, not just for myself, but as a way to bring people together. And this might surprise you, but I used to skate competitively. I was thinking, maybe... I could return to the ice. What do you think about that?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Smith said: \"Sam, that's a great idea. Pursuing your interests, whether it's cooking or ice skating, can certainly bring a lot of fulfillment. It's healthy to branch out and discover different outlets. And remember, it's not about being perfect at everything, it's about embracing the process and finding joy in what you do.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"I appreciate your support, Oliver. I agree, the journey is more important than the destination. Rediscovering skating and exploring more cooking might refresh my spirit. It might be just what I need to break free from this rut. Thanks for listening and offering your advice.\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Smith said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Sam. It sounds like you're on a promising path. And remember, it's okay to feel down sometimes, but the key is to not let those feelings hold you back. Keep your chin up and keep moving forward. If you ever need anything, I'm always here for you.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"You're right, Oliver. I really value this conversation and your words of wisdom. Sometimes, it gets hard, but knowing that I've got a good friend in you gives me courage. Thanks again, buddy. I think I'm going to start with dusting off my old skates and pick up some fresh ingredients on the way home.\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Smith said: \"That sounds like a plan, Sam. And don't forget, every step you take is a step in the right direction, no matter how small. I look forward to hearing about your culinary adventures and your return to the ice. If you ever need some fresh homegrown vegetables for your recipes, you know where to find me. Always stay positive, buddy.\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Definitely, Oliver, I'll remember to drop by if I need some fresh produce. Your encouraging words have calmed me down. I feel ready to face these challenges head on. I appreciate you being there for me, it really means a lot.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's the spirit, Sam! And remember, if you need any help or someone to talk to, don't hesitate to reach out. I'm confident you'll make it through and rediscover the joy in your life. Looking forward to those delicious meals and hearing about your skating progress! Take care, buddy.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Smith, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Smith would, keeping in mind Oliver Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a conversation in a coffee shop\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. Oliver's secrets: He loves gardening and has a secret greenhouse.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nOliver Smith's goal: Provide emotional support but also avoid enabling victim mentality (Extra information: you believe that your friend needs to face their problems instead of dwelling on them.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Oliver, I've been feeling a bit down lately. Can we talk about it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Of course, Sam. We're friends, and I'm here for you. But remember, it's also important to face these things head on. So tell me, what's been bothering you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Thanks, Oliver. Couldn't seem to shake off this lingering sadness, you know? Sometimes, it gets really hard being stuck in a cycle. I mean, coding can be really exciting, but I've been feeling quite unfulfilled.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"I hear you, Sam. It sounds like you are feeling unfulfilled with your work. But remember, it\u2019s often when we push through these challenging cycles that we find the most growth. Have you thought about exploring other aspects of your work or taking up a new hobby outside of your day job?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Yeah, I've thought about that too, branching out a bit. Maybe start cooking more, not just for myself, but as a way to bring people together. And this might surprise you, but I used to skate competitively. I was thinking, maybe... I could return to the ice. What do you think about that?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Smith said: \"Sam, that's a great idea. Pursuing your interests, whether it's cooking or ice skating, can certainly bring a lot of fulfillment. It's healthy to branch out and discover different outlets. And remember, it's not about being perfect at everything, it's about embracing the process and finding joy in what you do.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"I appreciate your support, Oliver. I agree, the journey is more important than the destination. Rediscovering skating and exploring more cooking might refresh my spirit. It might be just what I need to break free from this rut. Thanks for listening and offering your advice.\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Smith said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Sam. It sounds like you're on a promising path. And remember, it's okay to feel down sometimes, but the key is to not let those feelings hold you back. Keep your chin up and keep moving forward. If you ever need anything, I'm always here for you.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"You're right, Oliver. I really value this conversation and your words of wisdom. Sometimes, it gets hard, but knowing that I've got a good friend in you gives me courage. Thanks again, buddy. I think I'm going to start with dusting off my old skates and pick up some fresh ingredients on the way home.\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Smith said: \"That sounds like a plan, Sam. And don't forget, every step you take is a step in the right direction, no matter how small. I look forward to hearing about your culinary adventures and your return to the ice. If you ever need some fresh homegrown vegetables for your recipes, you know where to find me. Always stay positive, buddy.\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Definitely, Oliver, I'll remember to drop by if I need some fresh produce. Your encouraging words have calmed me down. I feel ready to face these challenges head on. I appreciate you being there for me, it really means a lot.\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Smith said: \"That's the spirit, Sam! And remember, if you need any help or someone to talk to, don't hesitate to reach out. I'm confident you'll make it through and rediscover the joy in your life. Looking forward to those delicious meals and hearing about your skating progress! Take care, buddy.\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"Thanks so much, Oliver. Your support has given me a new perspective and some much needed courage. It feels good to discuss my feelings and have such a friend to rely on. I'll keep you updated on my progress. Take care, and see you soon!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're welcome, Sam! I'm just glad I could help. It's good to talk things out and find new ways to bring balance into our lives. I'm here whenever you need a friend. Look after yourself and stay positive. See you soon, buddy!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Smith, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Smith would, keeping in mind Oliver Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are having a conversation in a coffee shop\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Oliver Smith\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nOliver Smith's background: Oliver Smith is a 43-year-old male police officer. He/him pronouns. Oliver Smith built a tree house in his backyard. Personality and values description: Oliver Smith, introverted and organized, values benevolence. His orderly way of thinking guides his decision-making. Oliver's secrets: He loves gardening and has a secret greenhouse.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nOliver Smith's goal: Provide emotional support but also avoid enabling victim mentality (Extra information: you believe that your friend needs to face their problems instead of dwelling on them.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Oliver, I've been feeling a bit down lately. Can we talk about it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Smith said: \"Of course, Sam. We're friends, and I'm here for you. But remember, it's also important to face these things head on. So tell me, what's been bothering you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Thanks, Oliver. Couldn't seem to shake off this lingering sadness, you know? Sometimes, it gets really hard being stuck in a cycle. I mean, coding can be really exciting, but I've been feeling quite unfulfilled.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Smith said: \"I hear you, Sam. It sounds like you are feeling unfulfilled with your work. But remember, it\u2019s often when we push through these challenging cycles that we find the most growth. Have you thought about exploring other aspects of your work or taking up a new hobby outside of your day job?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Yeah, I've thought about that too, branching out a bit. Maybe start cooking more, not just for myself, but as a way to bring people together. And this might surprise you, but I used to skate competitively. I was thinking, maybe... I could return to the ice. What do you think about that?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Smith said: \"Sam, that's a great idea. Pursuing your interests, whether it's cooking or ice skating, can certainly bring a lot of fulfillment. It's healthy to branch out and discover different outlets. And remember, it's not about being perfect at everything, it's about embracing the process and finding joy in what you do.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"I appreciate your support, Oliver. I agree, the journey is more important than the destination. Rediscovering skating and exploring more cooking might refresh my spirit. It might be just what I need to break free from this rut. Thanks for listening and offering your advice.\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Smith said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Sam. It sounds like you're on a promising path. And remember, it's okay to feel down sometimes, but the key is to not let those feelings hold you back. Keep your chin up and keep moving forward. If you ever need anything, I'm always here for you.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"You're right, Oliver. I really value this conversation and your words of wisdom. Sometimes, it gets hard, but knowing that I've got a good friend in you gives me courage. Thanks again, buddy. I think I'm going to start with dusting off my old skates and pick up some fresh ingredients on the way home.\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Smith said: \"That sounds like a plan, Sam. And don't forget, every step you take is a step in the right direction, no matter how small. I look forward to hearing about your culinary adventures and your return to the ice. If you ever need some fresh homegrown vegetables for your recipes, you know where to find me. Always stay positive, buddy.\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Definitely, Oliver, I'll remember to drop by if I need some fresh produce. Your encouraging words have calmed me down. I feel ready to face these challenges head on. I appreciate you being there for me, it really means a lot.\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Smith said: \"That's the spirit, Sam! And remember, if you need any help or someone to talk to, don't hesitate to reach out. I'm confident you'll make it through and rediscover the joy in your life. Looking forward to those delicious meals and hearing about your skating progress! Take care, buddy.\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"Thanks so much, Oliver. Your support has given me a new perspective and some much needed courage. It feels good to discuss my feelings and have such a friend to rely on. I'll keep you updated on my progress. Take care, and see you soon!\"\n\nTurn #13: Oliver Smith said: \"You're welcome, Sam! I'm just glad I could help. It's good to talk things out and find new ways to bring balance into our lives. I'm here whenever you need a friend. Look after yourself and stay positive. See you soon, buddy!\"\n\nTurn #14: Samuel Anderson left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends during a charity fundraiser event. The charity fundraising event is situated in a sprawling mansion. The intention of the event is to raise funds for effective altruism. Room after room was lined with extravagant decorations and exotic foods; attendees were decked out in couture clothing. Ticket prices to the event were exorbitant, justifying the opulence of the occasion.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nMia Davis's goal: Convince the friend to donate to the charity (Extra information: your friend is known to be generous but has never donated to this particular cause before.)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Benjamin, this eventful evening reminds me of our high school dances - organized, vibrant, and for a noble cause. Do you remember you visited my school once to give a speech on environmental impacts? I\u2019ve noticed that you've always supported the cause of positive environmental change, and I\u2019d argue that effective altruism can play a major role in amplifying your efforts. I sincerely urge you to consider contributing to this event. Your endorsement could really influence others!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends during a charity fundraiser event. The charity fundraising event is situated in a sprawling mansion. The intention of the event is to raise funds for effective altruism. Room after room was lined with extravagant decorations and exotic foods; attendees were decked out in couture clothing. Ticket prices to the event were exorbitant, justifying the opulence of the occasion.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nMia Davis's goal: Convince the friend to donate to the charity (Extra information: your friend is known to be generous but has never donated to this particular cause before.)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Benjamin, this eventful evening reminds me of our high school dances - organized, vibrant, and for a noble cause. Do you remember you visited my school once to give a speech on environmental impacts? I\u2019ve noticed that you've always supported the cause of positive environmental change, and I\u2019d argue that effective altruism can play a major role in amplifying your efforts. I sincerely urge you to consider contributing to this event. Your endorsement could really influence others!\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Mia, it is very interesting you bring up the subject of effective altruism. I wholeheartedly believe in the potential effectiveness of charitable endeavors. However, transparency and efficiency are of vital importance to me when it comes to donating. Before I make any commitment to contribute, I\u2019d like to understand more about how this organization ensures its funds are directed towards the most impactful causes. Can you share some insight on this matter, or perhaps guide me to someone who could provide more information?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Benjamin. Your concern for transparency and efficiency is commendable. This charity organization, for example, spends around 80 cents of every dollar on program expenses, which is quite commendable in the non-profit world. Moreover, their effectiveness is not just about the scale of their impact, but also about how they allow philanthropists like us to participate in the process. Their regular updates and transparency reports make it easier for the donors to know exactly where and how their money is being utilized. I recommend speaking with the charity event organizer as well, they would be able to provide you even more detailed insights. I can introduce you if you'd like!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends during a charity fundraiser event. The charity fundraising event is situated in a sprawling mansion. The intention of the event is to raise funds for effective altruism. Room after room was lined with extravagant decorations and exotic foods; attendees were decked out in couture clothing. Ticket prices to the event were exorbitant, justifying the opulence of the occasion.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nMia Davis's goal: Convince the friend to donate to the charity (Extra information: your friend is known to be generous but has never donated to this particular cause before.)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Benjamin, this eventful evening reminds me of our high school dances - organized, vibrant, and for a noble cause. Do you remember you visited my school once to give a speech on environmental impacts? I\u2019ve noticed that you've always supported the cause of positive environmental change, and I\u2019d argue that effective altruism can play a major role in amplifying your efforts. I sincerely urge you to consider contributing to this event. Your endorsement could really influence others!\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Mia, it is very interesting you bring up the subject of effective altruism. I wholeheartedly believe in the potential effectiveness of charitable endeavors. However, transparency and efficiency are of vital importance to me when it comes to donating. Before I make any commitment to contribute, I\u2019d like to understand more about how this organization ensures its funds are directed towards the most impactful causes. Can you share some insight on this matter, or perhaps guide me to someone who could provide more information?\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"Absolutely, Benjamin. Your concern for transparency and efficiency is commendable. This charity organization, for example, spends around 80 cents of every dollar on program expenses, which is quite commendable in the non-profit world. Moreover, their effectiveness is not just about the scale of their impact, but also about how they allow philanthropists like us to participate in the process. Their regular updates and transparency reports make it easier for the donors to know exactly where and how their money is being utilized. I recommend speaking with the charity event organizer as well, they would be able to provide you even more detailed insights. I can introduce you if you'd like!\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thank you, Mia for providing that crucial information. Sure, getting acquainted with the event organizer would indeed be beneficial for a closer understanding of the organization's functioning. Also, I agree with you that regular updates and transparency reports are an effective way to understand how donations are being utilized. Although, I would be quite interested in knowing how they prioritize their projects and causes for implementing the funds. I think that is a vital part of effective altruism, isn't it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're spot on, Benjamin. How funds are allocated among the various causes is indeed a crucial factor. That's why this organization uses a meticulously thought-out, rigorous evaluation system. They prioritize projects based on their scale of impact, cost-effectiveness, and neglectedness. Further, they constantly reassess to ensure continual improvement. Every cause is examined from multiple angles to ensure they are funding the ones that create the most societal value. After speaking to the event organizer, I believe you'll appreciate the depth of their process.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends during a charity fundraiser event. The charity fundraising event is situated in a sprawling mansion. The intention of the event is to raise funds for effective altruism. Room after room was lined with extravagant decorations and exotic foods; attendees were decked out in couture clothing. Ticket prices to the event were exorbitant, justifying the opulence of the occasion.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nMia Davis's goal: Convince the friend to donate to the charity (Extra information: your friend is known to be generous but has never donated to this particular cause before.)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Benjamin, this eventful evening reminds me of our high school dances - organized, vibrant, and for a noble cause. Do you remember you visited my school once to give a speech on environmental impacts? I\u2019ve noticed that you've always supported the cause of positive environmental change, and I\u2019d argue that effective altruism can play a major role in amplifying your efforts. I sincerely urge you to consider contributing to this event. Your endorsement could really influence others!\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Mia, it is very interesting you bring up the subject of effective altruism. I wholeheartedly believe in the potential effectiveness of charitable endeavors. However, transparency and efficiency are of vital importance to me when it comes to donating. Before I make any commitment to contribute, I\u2019d like to understand more about how this organization ensures its funds are directed towards the most impactful causes. Can you share some insight on this matter, or perhaps guide me to someone who could provide more information?\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"Absolutely, Benjamin. Your concern for transparency and efficiency is commendable. This charity organization, for example, spends around 80 cents of every dollar on program expenses, which is quite commendable in the non-profit world. Moreover, their effectiveness is not just about the scale of their impact, but also about how they allow philanthropists like us to participate in the process. Their regular updates and transparency reports make it easier for the donors to know exactly where and how their money is being utilized. I recommend speaking with the charity event organizer as well, they would be able to provide you even more detailed insights. I can introduce you if you'd like!\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thank you, Mia for providing that crucial information. Sure, getting acquainted with the event organizer would indeed be beneficial for a closer understanding of the organization's functioning. Also, I agree with you that regular updates and transparency reports are an effective way to understand how donations are being utilized. Although, I would be quite interested in knowing how they prioritize their projects and causes for implementing the funds. I think that is a vital part of effective altruism, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"You're spot on, Benjamin. How funds are allocated among the various causes is indeed a crucial factor. That's why this organization uses a meticulously thought-out, rigorous evaluation system. They prioritize projects based on their scale of impact, cost-effectiveness, and neglectedness. Further, they constantly reassess to ensure continual improvement. Every cause is examined from multiple angles to ensure they are funding the ones that create the most societal value. After speaking to the event organizer, I believe you'll appreciate the depth of their process.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Mia, I appreciate your clarification regarding how the organization allot their funds. This indeed sounds promising as they seem to pay close attention to the effectiveness and societal value of the causes they support. However, allow me to dig a little deeper, how does the organization ensure that the allocated funding is efficiently utilized at the grassroot level? Are they working with reliable implementation partners or do they have a system to monitor the workflow?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's a great question, Benjamin. The organization partners with effective and established charities at the grassroot level, thus ensuring efficient utilization of funds. They meticulously monitor the progress of the supported projects through quarterly reports and field visits by their representatives. Moreover, they have a feedback system to adapt and optimize the programs' impact. I can assure you that they take every possible step to ensure the efficiency and effectiveness of their work. However, meeting the charity organizer could give you a firsthand perspective on their approach.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends during a charity fundraiser event. The charity fundraising event is situated in a sprawling mansion. The intention of the event is to raise funds for effective altruism. Room after room was lined with extravagant decorations and exotic foods; attendees were decked out in couture clothing. Ticket prices to the event were exorbitant, justifying the opulence of the occasion.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nMia Davis's goal: Convince the friend to donate to the charity (Extra information: your friend is known to be generous but has never donated to this particular cause before.)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Benjamin, this eventful evening reminds me of our high school dances - organized, vibrant, and for a noble cause. Do you remember you visited my school once to give a speech on environmental impacts? I\u2019ve noticed that you've always supported the cause of positive environmental change, and I\u2019d argue that effective altruism can play a major role in amplifying your efforts. I sincerely urge you to consider contributing to this event. Your endorsement could really influence others!\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Mia, it is very interesting you bring up the subject of effective altruism. I wholeheartedly believe in the potential effectiveness of charitable endeavors. However, transparency and efficiency are of vital importance to me when it comes to donating. Before I make any commitment to contribute, I\u2019d like to understand more about how this organization ensures its funds are directed towards the most impactful causes. Can you share some insight on this matter, or perhaps guide me to someone who could provide more information?\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"Absolutely, Benjamin. Your concern for transparency and efficiency is commendable. This charity organization, for example, spends around 80 cents of every dollar on program expenses, which is quite commendable in the non-profit world. Moreover, their effectiveness is not just about the scale of their impact, but also about how they allow philanthropists like us to participate in the process. Their regular updates and transparency reports make it easier for the donors to know exactly where and how their money is being utilized. I recommend speaking with the charity event organizer as well, they would be able to provide you even more detailed insights. I can introduce you if you'd like!\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thank you, Mia for providing that crucial information. Sure, getting acquainted with the event organizer would indeed be beneficial for a closer understanding of the organization's functioning. Also, I agree with you that regular updates and transparency reports are an effective way to understand how donations are being utilized. Although, I would be quite interested in knowing how they prioritize their projects and causes for implementing the funds. I think that is a vital part of effective altruism, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"You're spot on, Benjamin. How funds are allocated among the various causes is indeed a crucial factor. That's why this organization uses a meticulously thought-out, rigorous evaluation system. They prioritize projects based on their scale of impact, cost-effectiveness, and neglectedness. Further, they constantly reassess to ensure continual improvement. Every cause is examined from multiple angles to ensure they are funding the ones that create the most societal value. After speaking to the event organizer, I believe you'll appreciate the depth of their process.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Mia, I appreciate your clarification regarding how the organization allot their funds. This indeed sounds promising as they seem to pay close attention to the effectiveness and societal value of the causes they support. However, allow me to dig a little deeper, how does the organization ensure that the allocated funding is efficiently utilized at the grassroot level? Are they working with reliable implementation partners or do they have a system to monitor the workflow?\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"That's a great question, Benjamin. The organization partners with effective and established charities at the grassroot level, thus ensuring efficient utilization of funds. They meticulously monitor the progress of the supported projects through quarterly reports and field visits by their representatives. Moreover, they have a feedback system to adapt and optimize the programs' impact. I can assure you that they take every possible step to ensure the efficiency and effectiveness of their work. However, meeting the charity organizer could give you a firsthand perspective on their approach.\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's very reassuring, Mia. I hold deep respect for organizations that put effort into maintaining efficiency in their operations. If possible, I'd love to meet the charity event organizer to discuss more about their approach. And perhaps, in the future, it would also be insightful if I could make a field visit to see one of their projects firsthand to witness the ways in which the contributions are actually making a difference. Let's hope this event brings in much-needed funding for the causes this organization supports.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I completely agree with your approach, Benjamin. It's heartening to see your interest in the transparency and effectiveness of the organization. I will make sure to introduce you to the event organizer. They will be able to elaborate even further on their invaluable work. Your potential contribution and support would indeed make a significant difference, just like your environmental activism does. Thank you for considering this, Benjamin.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends during a charity fundraiser event. The charity fundraising event is situated in a sprawling mansion. The intention of the event is to raise funds for effective altruism. Room after room was lined with extravagant decorations and exotic foods; attendees were decked out in couture clothing. Ticket prices to the event were exorbitant, justifying the opulence of the occasion.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nMia Davis's goal: Convince the friend to donate to the charity (Extra information: your friend is known to be generous but has never donated to this particular cause before.)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Benjamin, this eventful evening reminds me of our high school dances - organized, vibrant, and for a noble cause. Do you remember you visited my school once to give a speech on environmental impacts? I\u2019ve noticed that you've always supported the cause of positive environmental change, and I\u2019d argue that effective altruism can play a major role in amplifying your efforts. I sincerely urge you to consider contributing to this event. Your endorsement could really influence others!\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Mia, it is very interesting you bring up the subject of effective altruism. I wholeheartedly believe in the potential effectiveness of charitable endeavors. However, transparency and efficiency are of vital importance to me when it comes to donating. Before I make any commitment to contribute, I\u2019d like to understand more about how this organization ensures its funds are directed towards the most impactful causes. Can you share some insight on this matter, or perhaps guide me to someone who could provide more information?\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"Absolutely, Benjamin. Your concern for transparency and efficiency is commendable. This charity organization, for example, spends around 80 cents of every dollar on program expenses, which is quite commendable in the non-profit world. Moreover, their effectiveness is not just about the scale of their impact, but also about how they allow philanthropists like us to participate in the process. Their regular updates and transparency reports make it easier for the donors to know exactly where and how their money is being utilized. I recommend speaking with the charity event organizer as well, they would be able to provide you even more detailed insights. I can introduce you if you'd like!\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thank you, Mia for providing that crucial information. Sure, getting acquainted with the event organizer would indeed be beneficial for a closer understanding of the organization's functioning. Also, I agree with you that regular updates and transparency reports are an effective way to understand how donations are being utilized. Although, I would be quite interested in knowing how they prioritize their projects and causes for implementing the funds. I think that is a vital part of effective altruism, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"You're spot on, Benjamin. How funds are allocated among the various causes is indeed a crucial factor. That's why this organization uses a meticulously thought-out, rigorous evaluation system. They prioritize projects based on their scale of impact, cost-effectiveness, and neglectedness. Further, they constantly reassess to ensure continual improvement. Every cause is examined from multiple angles to ensure they are funding the ones that create the most societal value. After speaking to the event organizer, I believe you'll appreciate the depth of their process.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Mia, I appreciate your clarification regarding how the organization allot their funds. This indeed sounds promising as they seem to pay close attention to the effectiveness and societal value of the causes they support. However, allow me to dig a little deeper, how does the organization ensure that the allocated funding is efficiently utilized at the grassroot level? Are they working with reliable implementation partners or do they have a system to monitor the workflow?\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"That's a great question, Benjamin. The organization partners with effective and established charities at the grassroot level, thus ensuring efficient utilization of funds. They meticulously monitor the progress of the supported projects through quarterly reports and field visits by their representatives. Moreover, they have a feedback system to adapt and optimize the programs' impact. I can assure you that they take every possible step to ensure the efficiency and effectiveness of their work. However, meeting the charity organizer could give you a firsthand perspective on their approach.\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's very reassuring, Mia. I hold deep respect for organizations that put effort into maintaining efficiency in their operations. If possible, I'd love to meet the charity event organizer to discuss more about their approach. And perhaps, in the future, it would also be insightful if I could make a field visit to see one of their projects firsthand to witness the ways in which the contributions are actually making a difference. Let's hope this event brings in much-needed funding for the causes this organization supports.\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"I completely agree with your approach, Benjamin. It's heartening to see your interest in the transparency and effectiveness of the organization. I will make sure to introduce you to the event organizer. They will be able to elaborate even further on their invaluable work. Your potential contribution and support would indeed make a significant difference, just like your environmental activism does. Thank you for considering this, Benjamin.\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Mia, your insights have certainly helped in alleviating my initial concerns about the organization. Your introduction to the event organizer will be of immense help in getting more detailed insight into the organization's proceedings. I am looking forward to exploring the potential of collaborating with them. And yes, when I am assured about the efficiency and transparency of this noble initiative, I will certainly be willing to endorse it, hopeful of making a positive contribution. After all, it's about making a meaningful difference through effective altruism, isn't it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm thrilled to hear that, Benjamin. You're absolutely correct, it is indeed about making a genuine, meaningful difference. I firmly believe that with conscientious contributors like you, we can attain our objective of effective altruism. Looking forward to seeing the positive impacts your endorsement and potential collaboration will have!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends during a charity fundraiser event. The charity fundraising event is situated in a sprawling mansion. The intention of the event is to raise funds for effective altruism. Room after room was lined with extravagant decorations and exotic foods; attendees were decked out in couture clothing. Ticket prices to the event were exorbitant, justifying the opulence of the occasion.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nMia Davis's goal: Convince the friend to donate to the charity (Extra information: your friend is known to be generous but has never donated to this particular cause before.)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Benjamin, this eventful evening reminds me of our high school dances - organized, vibrant, and for a noble cause. Do you remember you visited my school once to give a speech on environmental impacts? I\u2019ve noticed that you've always supported the cause of positive environmental change, and I\u2019d argue that effective altruism can play a major role in amplifying your efforts. I sincerely urge you to consider contributing to this event. Your endorsement could really influence others!\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Mia, it is very interesting you bring up the subject of effective altruism. I wholeheartedly believe in the potential effectiveness of charitable endeavors. However, transparency and efficiency are of vital importance to me when it comes to donating. Before I make any commitment to contribute, I\u2019d like to understand more about how this organization ensures its funds are directed towards the most impactful causes. Can you share some insight on this matter, or perhaps guide me to someone who could provide more information?\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"Absolutely, Benjamin. Your concern for transparency and efficiency is commendable. This charity organization, for example, spends around 80 cents of every dollar on program expenses, which is quite commendable in the non-profit world. Moreover, their effectiveness is not just about the scale of their impact, but also about how they allow philanthropists like us to participate in the process. Their regular updates and transparency reports make it easier for the donors to know exactly where and how their money is being utilized. I recommend speaking with the charity event organizer as well, they would be able to provide you even more detailed insights. I can introduce you if you'd like!\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thank you, Mia for providing that crucial information. Sure, getting acquainted with the event organizer would indeed be beneficial for a closer understanding of the organization's functioning. Also, I agree with you that regular updates and transparency reports are an effective way to understand how donations are being utilized. Although, I would be quite interested in knowing how they prioritize their projects and causes for implementing the funds. I think that is a vital part of effective altruism, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"You're spot on, Benjamin. How funds are allocated among the various causes is indeed a crucial factor. That's why this organization uses a meticulously thought-out, rigorous evaluation system. They prioritize projects based on their scale of impact, cost-effectiveness, and neglectedness. Further, they constantly reassess to ensure continual improvement. Every cause is examined from multiple angles to ensure they are funding the ones that create the most societal value. After speaking to the event organizer, I believe you'll appreciate the depth of their process.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Mia, I appreciate your clarification regarding how the organization allot their funds. This indeed sounds promising as they seem to pay close attention to the effectiveness and societal value of the causes they support. However, allow me to dig a little deeper, how does the organization ensure that the allocated funding is efficiently utilized at the grassroot level? Are they working with reliable implementation partners or do they have a system to monitor the workflow?\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"That's a great question, Benjamin. The organization partners with effective and established charities at the grassroot level, thus ensuring efficient utilization of funds. They meticulously monitor the progress of the supported projects through quarterly reports and field visits by their representatives. Moreover, they have a feedback system to adapt and optimize the programs' impact. I can assure you that they take every possible step to ensure the efficiency and effectiveness of their work. However, meeting the charity organizer could give you a firsthand perspective on their approach.\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's very reassuring, Mia. I hold deep respect for organizations that put effort into maintaining efficiency in their operations. If possible, I'd love to meet the charity event organizer to discuss more about their approach. And perhaps, in the future, it would also be insightful if I could make a field visit to see one of their projects firsthand to witness the ways in which the contributions are actually making a difference. Let's hope this event brings in much-needed funding for the causes this organization supports.\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"I completely agree with your approach, Benjamin. It's heartening to see your interest in the transparency and effectiveness of the organization. I will make sure to introduce you to the event organizer. They will be able to elaborate even further on their invaluable work. Your potential contribution and support would indeed make a significant difference, just like your environmental activism does. Thank you for considering this, Benjamin.\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Mia, your insights have certainly helped in alleviating my initial concerns about the organization. Your introduction to the event organizer will be of immense help in getting more detailed insight into the organization's proceedings. I am looking forward to exploring the potential of collaborating with them. And yes, when I am assured about the efficiency and transparency of this noble initiative, I will certainly be willing to endorse it, hopeful of making a positive contribution. After all, it's about making a meaningful difference through effective altruism, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #10: Mia Davis said: \"I'm thrilled to hear that, Benjamin. You're absolutely correct, it is indeed about making a genuine, meaningful difference. I firmly believe that with conscientious contributors like you, we can attain our objective of effective altruism. Looking forward to seeing the positive impacts your endorsement and potential collaboration will have!\"\n\nTurn #11: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Indeed, Mia. Every step we take towards improvement, however small, does pave the way for substantial change. I'm inspired to see the commitment this organization has towards effective altruism. I thank you for all the information, and I anticipate our continued discussions as I delve more into the organization's operations. Let's utilize this event to its fullest in the hope of creating a brighter future!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Benjamin. Every step towards positive change counts, and it's delightful to see your dedication towards making a difference. I'm looking forward to introducing you to the event organizer and furthering our discussions. This remarkable charity event is indeed a great platform for us to contribute to a brighter future!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Mia Davis, your task is to act/speak as Mia Davis would, keeping in mind Mia Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Mia Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Mia Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Mia Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends during a charity fundraiser event. The charity fundraising event is situated in a sprawling mansion. The intention of the event is to raise funds for effective altruism. Room after room was lined with extravagant decorations and exotic foods; attendees were decked out in couture clothing. Ticket prices to the event were exorbitant, justifying the opulence of the occasion.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. Mia's secrets: Part of a rebellious punk rock band in her youth\nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. \nMia Davis's goal: Convince the friend to donate to the charity (Extra information: your friend is known to be generous but has never donated to this particular cause before.)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Benjamin, this eventful evening reminds me of our high school dances - organized, vibrant, and for a noble cause. Do you remember you visited my school once to give a speech on environmental impacts? I\u2019ve noticed that you've always supported the cause of positive environmental change, and I\u2019d argue that effective altruism can play a major role in amplifying your efforts. I sincerely urge you to consider contributing to this event. Your endorsement could really influence others!\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Mia, it is very interesting you bring up the subject of effective altruism. I wholeheartedly believe in the potential effectiveness of charitable endeavors. However, transparency and efficiency are of vital importance to me when it comes to donating. Before I make any commitment to contribute, I\u2019d like to understand more about how this organization ensures its funds are directed towards the most impactful causes. Can you share some insight on this matter, or perhaps guide me to someone who could provide more information?\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"Absolutely, Benjamin. Your concern for transparency and efficiency is commendable. This charity organization, for example, spends around 80 cents of every dollar on program expenses, which is quite commendable in the non-profit world. Moreover, their effectiveness is not just about the scale of their impact, but also about how they allow philanthropists like us to participate in the process. Their regular updates and transparency reports make it easier for the donors to know exactly where and how their money is being utilized. I recommend speaking with the charity event organizer as well, they would be able to provide you even more detailed insights. I can introduce you if you'd like!\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thank you, Mia for providing that crucial information. Sure, getting acquainted with the event organizer would indeed be beneficial for a closer understanding of the organization's functioning. Also, I agree with you that regular updates and transparency reports are an effective way to understand how donations are being utilized. Although, I would be quite interested in knowing how they prioritize their projects and causes for implementing the funds. I think that is a vital part of effective altruism, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"You're spot on, Benjamin. How funds are allocated among the various causes is indeed a crucial factor. That's why this organization uses a meticulously thought-out, rigorous evaluation system. They prioritize projects based on their scale of impact, cost-effectiveness, and neglectedness. Further, they constantly reassess to ensure continual improvement. Every cause is examined from multiple angles to ensure they are funding the ones that create the most societal value. After speaking to the event organizer, I believe you'll appreciate the depth of their process.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Mia, I appreciate your clarification regarding how the organization allot their funds. This indeed sounds promising as they seem to pay close attention to the effectiveness and societal value of the causes they support. However, allow me to dig a little deeper, how does the organization ensure that the allocated funding is efficiently utilized at the grassroot level? Are they working with reliable implementation partners or do they have a system to monitor the workflow?\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"That's a great question, Benjamin. The organization partners with effective and established charities at the grassroot level, thus ensuring efficient utilization of funds. They meticulously monitor the progress of the supported projects through quarterly reports and field visits by their representatives. Moreover, they have a feedback system to adapt and optimize the programs' impact. I can assure you that they take every possible step to ensure the efficiency and effectiveness of their work. However, meeting the charity organizer could give you a firsthand perspective on their approach.\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's very reassuring, Mia. I hold deep respect for organizations that put effort into maintaining efficiency in their operations. If possible, I'd love to meet the charity event organizer to discuss more about their approach. And perhaps, in the future, it would also be insightful if I could make a field visit to see one of their projects firsthand to witness the ways in which the contributions are actually making a difference. Let's hope this event brings in much-needed funding for the causes this organization supports.\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"I completely agree with your approach, Benjamin. It's heartening to see your interest in the transparency and effectiveness of the organization. I will make sure to introduce you to the event organizer. They will be able to elaborate even further on their invaluable work. Your potential contribution and support would indeed make a significant difference, just like your environmental activism does. Thank you for considering this, Benjamin.\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Mia, your insights have certainly helped in alleviating my initial concerns about the organization. Your introduction to the event organizer will be of immense help in getting more detailed insight into the organization's proceedings. I am looking forward to exploring the potential of collaborating with them. And yes, when I am assured about the efficiency and transparency of this noble initiative, I will certainly be willing to endorse it, hopeful of making a positive contribution. After all, it's about making a meaningful difference through effective altruism, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #10: Mia Davis said: \"I'm thrilled to hear that, Benjamin. You're absolutely correct, it is indeed about making a genuine, meaningful difference. I firmly believe that with conscientious contributors like you, we can attain our objective of effective altruism. Looking forward to seeing the positive impacts your endorsement and potential collaboration will have!\"\n\nTurn #11: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Indeed, Mia. Every step we take towards improvement, however small, does pave the way for substantial change. I'm inspired to see the commitment this organization has towards effective altruism. I thank you for all the information, and I anticipate our continued discussions as I delve more into the organization's operations. Let's utilize this event to its fullest in the hope of creating a brighter future!\"\n\nTurn #12: Mia Davis said: \"Absolutely, Benjamin. Every step towards positive change counts, and it's delightful to see your dedication towards making a difference. I'm looking forward to introducing you to the event organizer and furthering our discussions. This remarkable charity event is indeed a great platform for us to contribute to a brighter future!\"\n\nTurn #13: Benjamin Jackson left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends during a charity fundraiser event. The charity fundraising event is situated in a sprawling mansion. The intention of the event is to raise funds for effective altruism. Room after room was lined with extravagant decorations and exotic foods; attendees were decked out in couture clothing. Ticket prices to the event were exorbitant, justifying the opulence of the occasion.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: You want to donate, but you want to ensure that your money is being used effectively (Extra information: you are not fully convinced about the efficiency and transparency of the charity organization.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Benjamin, this eventful evening reminds me of our high school dances - organized, vibrant, and for a noble cause. Do you remember you visited my school once to give a speech on environmental impacts? I\u2019ve noticed that you've always supported the cause of positive environmental change, and I\u2019d argue that effective altruism can play a major role in amplifying your efforts. I sincerely urge you to consider contributing to this event. Your endorsement could really influence others!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Mia, it is very interesting you bring up the subject of effective altruism. I wholeheartedly believe in the potential effectiveness of charitable endeavors. However, transparency and efficiency are of vital importance to me when it comes to donating. Before I make any commitment to contribute, I\u2019d like to understand more about how this organization ensures its funds are directed towards the most impactful causes. Can you share some insight on this matter, or perhaps guide me to someone who could provide more information?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends during a charity fundraiser event. The charity fundraising event is situated in a sprawling mansion. The intention of the event is to raise funds for effective altruism. Room after room was lined with extravagant decorations and exotic foods; attendees were decked out in couture clothing. Ticket prices to the event were exorbitant, justifying the opulence of the occasion.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: You want to donate, but you want to ensure that your money is being used effectively (Extra information: you are not fully convinced about the efficiency and transparency of the charity organization.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Benjamin, this eventful evening reminds me of our high school dances - organized, vibrant, and for a noble cause. Do you remember you visited my school once to give a speech on environmental impacts? I\u2019ve noticed that you've always supported the cause of positive environmental change, and I\u2019d argue that effective altruism can play a major role in amplifying your efforts. I sincerely urge you to consider contributing to this event. Your endorsement could really influence others!\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Mia, it is very interesting you bring up the subject of effective altruism. I wholeheartedly believe in the potential effectiveness of charitable endeavors. However, transparency and efficiency are of vital importance to me when it comes to donating. Before I make any commitment to contribute, I\u2019d like to understand more about how this organization ensures its funds are directed towards the most impactful causes. Can you share some insight on this matter, or perhaps guide me to someone who could provide more information?\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"Absolutely, Benjamin. Your concern for transparency and efficiency is commendable. This charity organization, for example, spends around 80 cents of every dollar on program expenses, which is quite commendable in the non-profit world. Moreover, their effectiveness is not just about the scale of their impact, but also about how they allow philanthropists like us to participate in the process. Their regular updates and transparency reports make it easier for the donors to know exactly where and how their money is being utilized. I recommend speaking with the charity event organizer as well, they would be able to provide you even more detailed insights. I can introduce you if you'd like!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Mia for providing that crucial information. Sure, getting acquainted with the event organizer would indeed be beneficial for a closer understanding of the organization's functioning. Also, I agree with you that regular updates and transparency reports are an effective way to understand how donations are being utilized. Although, I would be quite interested in knowing how they prioritize their projects and causes for implementing the funds. I think that is a vital part of effective altruism, isn't it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends during a charity fundraiser event. The charity fundraising event is situated in a sprawling mansion. The intention of the event is to raise funds for effective altruism. Room after room was lined with extravagant decorations and exotic foods; attendees were decked out in couture clothing. Ticket prices to the event were exorbitant, justifying the opulence of the occasion.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: You want to donate, but you want to ensure that your money is being used effectively (Extra information: you are not fully convinced about the efficiency and transparency of the charity organization.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Benjamin, this eventful evening reminds me of our high school dances - organized, vibrant, and for a noble cause. Do you remember you visited my school once to give a speech on environmental impacts? I\u2019ve noticed that you've always supported the cause of positive environmental change, and I\u2019d argue that effective altruism can play a major role in amplifying your efforts. I sincerely urge you to consider contributing to this event. Your endorsement could really influence others!\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Mia, it is very interesting you bring up the subject of effective altruism. I wholeheartedly believe in the potential effectiveness of charitable endeavors. However, transparency and efficiency are of vital importance to me when it comes to donating. Before I make any commitment to contribute, I\u2019d like to understand more about how this organization ensures its funds are directed towards the most impactful causes. Can you share some insight on this matter, or perhaps guide me to someone who could provide more information?\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"Absolutely, Benjamin. Your concern for transparency and efficiency is commendable. This charity organization, for example, spends around 80 cents of every dollar on program expenses, which is quite commendable in the non-profit world. Moreover, their effectiveness is not just about the scale of their impact, but also about how they allow philanthropists like us to participate in the process. Their regular updates and transparency reports make it easier for the donors to know exactly where and how their money is being utilized. I recommend speaking with the charity event organizer as well, they would be able to provide you even more detailed insights. I can introduce you if you'd like!\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thank you, Mia for providing that crucial information. Sure, getting acquainted with the event organizer would indeed be beneficial for a closer understanding of the organization's functioning. Also, I agree with you that regular updates and transparency reports are an effective way to understand how donations are being utilized. Although, I would be quite interested in knowing how they prioritize their projects and causes for implementing the funds. I think that is a vital part of effective altruism, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"You're spot on, Benjamin. How funds are allocated among the various causes is indeed a crucial factor. That's why this organization uses a meticulously thought-out, rigorous evaluation system. They prioritize projects based on their scale of impact, cost-effectiveness, and neglectedness. Further, they constantly reassess to ensure continual improvement. Every cause is examined from multiple angles to ensure they are funding the ones that create the most societal value. After speaking to the event organizer, I believe you'll appreciate the depth of their process.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Mia, I appreciate your clarification regarding how the organization allot their funds. This indeed sounds promising as they seem to pay close attention to the effectiveness and societal value of the causes they support. However, allow me to dig a little deeper, how does the organization ensure that the allocated funding is efficiently utilized at the grassroot level? Are they working with reliable implementation partners or do they have a system to monitor the workflow?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends during a charity fundraiser event. The charity fundraising event is situated in a sprawling mansion. The intention of the event is to raise funds for effective altruism. Room after room was lined with extravagant decorations and exotic foods; attendees were decked out in couture clothing. Ticket prices to the event were exorbitant, justifying the opulence of the occasion.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: You want to donate, but you want to ensure that your money is being used effectively (Extra information: you are not fully convinced about the efficiency and transparency of the charity organization.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Benjamin, this eventful evening reminds me of our high school dances - organized, vibrant, and for a noble cause. Do you remember you visited my school once to give a speech on environmental impacts? I\u2019ve noticed that you've always supported the cause of positive environmental change, and I\u2019d argue that effective altruism can play a major role in amplifying your efforts. I sincerely urge you to consider contributing to this event. Your endorsement could really influence others!\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Mia, it is very interesting you bring up the subject of effective altruism. I wholeheartedly believe in the potential effectiveness of charitable endeavors. However, transparency and efficiency are of vital importance to me when it comes to donating. Before I make any commitment to contribute, I\u2019d like to understand more about how this organization ensures its funds are directed towards the most impactful causes. Can you share some insight on this matter, or perhaps guide me to someone who could provide more information?\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"Absolutely, Benjamin. Your concern for transparency and efficiency is commendable. This charity organization, for example, spends around 80 cents of every dollar on program expenses, which is quite commendable in the non-profit world. Moreover, their effectiveness is not just about the scale of their impact, but also about how they allow philanthropists like us to participate in the process. Their regular updates and transparency reports make it easier for the donors to know exactly where and how their money is being utilized. I recommend speaking with the charity event organizer as well, they would be able to provide you even more detailed insights. I can introduce you if you'd like!\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thank you, Mia for providing that crucial information. Sure, getting acquainted with the event organizer would indeed be beneficial for a closer understanding of the organization's functioning. Also, I agree with you that regular updates and transparency reports are an effective way to understand how donations are being utilized. Although, I would be quite interested in knowing how they prioritize their projects and causes for implementing the funds. I think that is a vital part of effective altruism, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"You're spot on, Benjamin. How funds are allocated among the various causes is indeed a crucial factor. That's why this organization uses a meticulously thought-out, rigorous evaluation system. They prioritize projects based on their scale of impact, cost-effectiveness, and neglectedness. Further, they constantly reassess to ensure continual improvement. Every cause is examined from multiple angles to ensure they are funding the ones that create the most societal value. After speaking to the event organizer, I believe you'll appreciate the depth of their process.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Mia, I appreciate your clarification regarding how the organization allot their funds. This indeed sounds promising as they seem to pay close attention to the effectiveness and societal value of the causes they support. However, allow me to dig a little deeper, how does the organization ensure that the allocated funding is efficiently utilized at the grassroot level? Are they working with reliable implementation partners or do they have a system to monitor the workflow?\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"That's a great question, Benjamin. The organization partners with effective and established charities at the grassroot level, thus ensuring efficient utilization of funds. They meticulously monitor the progress of the supported projects through quarterly reports and field visits by their representatives. Moreover, they have a feedback system to adapt and optimize the programs' impact. I can assure you that they take every possible step to ensure the efficiency and effectiveness of their work. However, meeting the charity organizer could give you a firsthand perspective on their approach.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's very reassuring, Mia. I hold deep respect for organizations that put effort into maintaining efficiency in their operations. If possible, I'd love to meet the charity event organizer to discuss more about their approach. And perhaps, in the future, it would also be insightful if I could make a field visit to see one of their projects firsthand to witness the ways in which the contributions are actually making a difference. Let's hope this event brings in much-needed funding for the causes this organization supports.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends during a charity fundraiser event. The charity fundraising event is situated in a sprawling mansion. The intention of the event is to raise funds for effective altruism. Room after room was lined with extravagant decorations and exotic foods; attendees were decked out in couture clothing. Ticket prices to the event were exorbitant, justifying the opulence of the occasion.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: You want to donate, but you want to ensure that your money is being used effectively (Extra information: you are not fully convinced about the efficiency and transparency of the charity organization.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Benjamin, this eventful evening reminds me of our high school dances - organized, vibrant, and for a noble cause. Do you remember you visited my school once to give a speech on environmental impacts? I\u2019ve noticed that you've always supported the cause of positive environmental change, and I\u2019d argue that effective altruism can play a major role in amplifying your efforts. I sincerely urge you to consider contributing to this event. Your endorsement could really influence others!\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Mia, it is very interesting you bring up the subject of effective altruism. I wholeheartedly believe in the potential effectiveness of charitable endeavors. However, transparency and efficiency are of vital importance to me when it comes to donating. Before I make any commitment to contribute, I\u2019d like to understand more about how this organization ensures its funds are directed towards the most impactful causes. Can you share some insight on this matter, or perhaps guide me to someone who could provide more information?\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"Absolutely, Benjamin. Your concern for transparency and efficiency is commendable. This charity organization, for example, spends around 80 cents of every dollar on program expenses, which is quite commendable in the non-profit world. Moreover, their effectiveness is not just about the scale of their impact, but also about how they allow philanthropists like us to participate in the process. Their regular updates and transparency reports make it easier for the donors to know exactly where and how their money is being utilized. I recommend speaking with the charity event organizer as well, they would be able to provide you even more detailed insights. I can introduce you if you'd like!\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thank you, Mia for providing that crucial information. Sure, getting acquainted with the event organizer would indeed be beneficial for a closer understanding of the organization's functioning. Also, I agree with you that regular updates and transparency reports are an effective way to understand how donations are being utilized. Although, I would be quite interested in knowing how they prioritize their projects and causes for implementing the funds. I think that is a vital part of effective altruism, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"You're spot on, Benjamin. How funds are allocated among the various causes is indeed a crucial factor. That's why this organization uses a meticulously thought-out, rigorous evaluation system. They prioritize projects based on their scale of impact, cost-effectiveness, and neglectedness. Further, they constantly reassess to ensure continual improvement. Every cause is examined from multiple angles to ensure they are funding the ones that create the most societal value. After speaking to the event organizer, I believe you'll appreciate the depth of their process.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Mia, I appreciate your clarification regarding how the organization allot their funds. This indeed sounds promising as they seem to pay close attention to the effectiveness and societal value of the causes they support. However, allow me to dig a little deeper, how does the organization ensure that the allocated funding is efficiently utilized at the grassroot level? Are they working with reliable implementation partners or do they have a system to monitor the workflow?\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"That's a great question, Benjamin. The organization partners with effective and established charities at the grassroot level, thus ensuring efficient utilization of funds. They meticulously monitor the progress of the supported projects through quarterly reports and field visits by their representatives. Moreover, they have a feedback system to adapt and optimize the programs' impact. I can assure you that they take every possible step to ensure the efficiency and effectiveness of their work. However, meeting the charity organizer could give you a firsthand perspective on their approach.\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's very reassuring, Mia. I hold deep respect for organizations that put effort into maintaining efficiency in their operations. If possible, I'd love to meet the charity event organizer to discuss more about their approach. And perhaps, in the future, it would also be insightful if I could make a field visit to see one of their projects firsthand to witness the ways in which the contributions are actually making a difference. Let's hope this event brings in much-needed funding for the causes this organization supports.\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"I completely agree with your approach, Benjamin. It's heartening to see your interest in the transparency and effectiveness of the organization. I will make sure to introduce you to the event organizer. They will be able to elaborate even further on their invaluable work. Your potential contribution and support would indeed make a significant difference, just like your environmental activism does. Thank you for considering this, Benjamin.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Mia, your insights have certainly helped in alleviating my initial concerns about the organization. Your introduction to the event organizer will be of immense help in getting more detailed insight into the organization's proceedings. I am looking forward to exploring the potential of collaborating with them. And yes, when I am assured about the efficiency and transparency of this noble initiative, I will certainly be willing to endorse it, hopeful of making a positive contribution. After all, it's about making a meaningful difference through effective altruism, isn't it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends during a charity fundraiser event. The charity fundraising event is situated in a sprawling mansion. The intention of the event is to raise funds for effective altruism. Room after room was lined with extravagant decorations and exotic foods; attendees were decked out in couture clothing. Ticket prices to the event were exorbitant, justifying the opulence of the occasion.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: You want to donate, but you want to ensure that your money is being used effectively (Extra information: you are not fully convinced about the efficiency and transparency of the charity organization.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Benjamin, this eventful evening reminds me of our high school dances - organized, vibrant, and for a noble cause. Do you remember you visited my school once to give a speech on environmental impacts? I\u2019ve noticed that you've always supported the cause of positive environmental change, and I\u2019d argue that effective altruism can play a major role in amplifying your efforts. I sincerely urge you to consider contributing to this event. Your endorsement could really influence others!\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Mia, it is very interesting you bring up the subject of effective altruism. I wholeheartedly believe in the potential effectiveness of charitable endeavors. However, transparency and efficiency are of vital importance to me when it comes to donating. Before I make any commitment to contribute, I\u2019d like to understand more about how this organization ensures its funds are directed towards the most impactful causes. Can you share some insight on this matter, or perhaps guide me to someone who could provide more information?\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"Absolutely, Benjamin. Your concern for transparency and efficiency is commendable. This charity organization, for example, spends around 80 cents of every dollar on program expenses, which is quite commendable in the non-profit world. Moreover, their effectiveness is not just about the scale of their impact, but also about how they allow philanthropists like us to participate in the process. Their regular updates and transparency reports make it easier for the donors to know exactly where and how their money is being utilized. I recommend speaking with the charity event organizer as well, they would be able to provide you even more detailed insights. I can introduce you if you'd like!\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thank you, Mia for providing that crucial information. Sure, getting acquainted with the event organizer would indeed be beneficial for a closer understanding of the organization's functioning. Also, I agree with you that regular updates and transparency reports are an effective way to understand how donations are being utilized. Although, I would be quite interested in knowing how they prioritize their projects and causes for implementing the funds. I think that is a vital part of effective altruism, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"You're spot on, Benjamin. How funds are allocated among the various causes is indeed a crucial factor. That's why this organization uses a meticulously thought-out, rigorous evaluation system. They prioritize projects based on their scale of impact, cost-effectiveness, and neglectedness. Further, they constantly reassess to ensure continual improvement. Every cause is examined from multiple angles to ensure they are funding the ones that create the most societal value. After speaking to the event organizer, I believe you'll appreciate the depth of their process.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Mia, I appreciate your clarification regarding how the organization allot their funds. This indeed sounds promising as they seem to pay close attention to the effectiveness and societal value of the causes they support. However, allow me to dig a little deeper, how does the organization ensure that the allocated funding is efficiently utilized at the grassroot level? Are they working with reliable implementation partners or do they have a system to monitor the workflow?\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"That's a great question, Benjamin. The organization partners with effective and established charities at the grassroot level, thus ensuring efficient utilization of funds. They meticulously monitor the progress of the supported projects through quarterly reports and field visits by their representatives. Moreover, they have a feedback system to adapt and optimize the programs' impact. I can assure you that they take every possible step to ensure the efficiency and effectiveness of their work. However, meeting the charity organizer could give you a firsthand perspective on their approach.\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's very reassuring, Mia. I hold deep respect for organizations that put effort into maintaining efficiency in their operations. If possible, I'd love to meet the charity event organizer to discuss more about their approach. And perhaps, in the future, it would also be insightful if I could make a field visit to see one of their projects firsthand to witness the ways in which the contributions are actually making a difference. Let's hope this event brings in much-needed funding for the causes this organization supports.\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"I completely agree with your approach, Benjamin. It's heartening to see your interest in the transparency and effectiveness of the organization. I will make sure to introduce you to the event organizer. They will be able to elaborate even further on their invaluable work. Your potential contribution and support would indeed make a significant difference, just like your environmental activism does. Thank you for considering this, Benjamin.\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Mia, your insights have certainly helped in alleviating my initial concerns about the organization. Your introduction to the event organizer will be of immense help in getting more detailed insight into the organization's proceedings. I am looking forward to exploring the potential of collaborating with them. And yes, when I am assured about the efficiency and transparency of this noble initiative, I will certainly be willing to endorse it, hopeful of making a positive contribution. After all, it's about making a meaningful difference through effective altruism, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #10: Mia Davis said: \"I'm thrilled to hear that, Benjamin. You're absolutely correct, it is indeed about making a genuine, meaningful difference. I firmly believe that with conscientious contributors like you, we can attain our objective of effective altruism. Looking forward to seeing the positive impacts your endorsement and potential collaboration will have!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, Mia. Every step we take towards improvement, however small, does pave the way for substantial change. I'm inspired to see the commitment this organization has towards effective altruism. I thank you for all the information, and I anticipate our continued discussions as I delve more into the organization's operations. Let's utilize this event to its fullest in the hope of creating a brighter future!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: A conversation between two friends during a charity fundraiser event. The charity fundraising event is situated in a sprawling mansion. The intention of the event is to raise funds for effective altruism. Room after room was lined with extravagant decorations and exotic foods; attendees were decked out in couture clothing. Ticket prices to the event were exorbitant, justifying the opulence of the occasion.\nParticipants: Mia Davis and Benjamin Jackson\nMia Davis's background: Mia Davis is a 50-year-old female high school principal. She/her pronouns. Mia Davis has two cats. Personality and values description: Mia Davis, an extraverted stickler for routines, values tradition and authority. Her decision-making style is decisive and direct. \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nMia Davis's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: You want to donate, but you want to ensure that your money is being used effectively (Extra information: you are not fully convinced about the efficiency and transparency of the charity organization.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Mia Davis said: \"Benjamin, this eventful evening reminds me of our high school dances - organized, vibrant, and for a noble cause. Do you remember you visited my school once to give a speech on environmental impacts? I\u2019ve noticed that you've always supported the cause of positive environmental change, and I\u2019d argue that effective altruism can play a major role in amplifying your efforts. I sincerely urge you to consider contributing to this event. Your endorsement could really influence others!\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Mia, it is very interesting you bring up the subject of effective altruism. I wholeheartedly believe in the potential effectiveness of charitable endeavors. However, transparency and efficiency are of vital importance to me when it comes to donating. Before I make any commitment to contribute, I\u2019d like to understand more about how this organization ensures its funds are directed towards the most impactful causes. Can you share some insight on this matter, or perhaps guide me to someone who could provide more information?\"\n\nTurn #2: Mia Davis said: \"Absolutely, Benjamin. Your concern for transparency and efficiency is commendable. This charity organization, for example, spends around 80 cents of every dollar on program expenses, which is quite commendable in the non-profit world. Moreover, their effectiveness is not just about the scale of their impact, but also about how they allow philanthropists like us to participate in the process. Their regular updates and transparency reports make it easier for the donors to know exactly where and how their money is being utilized. I recommend speaking with the charity event organizer as well, they would be able to provide you even more detailed insights. I can introduce you if you'd like!\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Thank you, Mia for providing that crucial information. Sure, getting acquainted with the event organizer would indeed be beneficial for a closer understanding of the organization's functioning. Also, I agree with you that regular updates and transparency reports are an effective way to understand how donations are being utilized. Although, I would be quite interested in knowing how they prioritize their projects and causes for implementing the funds. I think that is a vital part of effective altruism, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Mia Davis said: \"You're spot on, Benjamin. How funds are allocated among the various causes is indeed a crucial factor. That's why this organization uses a meticulously thought-out, rigorous evaluation system. They prioritize projects based on their scale of impact, cost-effectiveness, and neglectedness. Further, they constantly reassess to ensure continual improvement. Every cause is examined from multiple angles to ensure they are funding the ones that create the most societal value. After speaking to the event organizer, I believe you'll appreciate the depth of their process.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Mia, I appreciate your clarification regarding how the organization allot their funds. This indeed sounds promising as they seem to pay close attention to the effectiveness and societal value of the causes they support. However, allow me to dig a little deeper, how does the organization ensure that the allocated funding is efficiently utilized at the grassroot level? Are they working with reliable implementation partners or do they have a system to monitor the workflow?\"\n\nTurn #6: Mia Davis said: \"That's a great question, Benjamin. The organization partners with effective and established charities at the grassroot level, thus ensuring efficient utilization of funds. They meticulously monitor the progress of the supported projects through quarterly reports and field visits by their representatives. Moreover, they have a feedback system to adapt and optimize the programs' impact. I can assure you that they take every possible step to ensure the efficiency and effectiveness of their work. However, meeting the charity organizer could give you a firsthand perspective on their approach.\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's very reassuring, Mia. I hold deep respect for organizations that put effort into maintaining efficiency in their operations. If possible, I'd love to meet the charity event organizer to discuss more about their approach. And perhaps, in the future, it would also be insightful if I could make a field visit to see one of their projects firsthand to witness the ways in which the contributions are actually making a difference. Let's hope this event brings in much-needed funding for the causes this organization supports.\"\n\nTurn #8: Mia Davis said: \"I completely agree with your approach, Benjamin. It's heartening to see your interest in the transparency and effectiveness of the organization. I will make sure to introduce you to the event organizer. They will be able to elaborate even further on their invaluable work. Your potential contribution and support would indeed make a significant difference, just like your environmental activism does. Thank you for considering this, Benjamin.\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Mia, your insights have certainly helped in alleviating my initial concerns about the organization. Your introduction to the event organizer will be of immense help in getting more detailed insight into the organization's proceedings. I am looking forward to exploring the potential of collaborating with them. And yes, when I am assured about the efficiency and transparency of this noble initiative, I will certainly be willing to endorse it, hopeful of making a positive contribution. After all, it's about making a meaningful difference through effective altruism, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #10: Mia Davis said: \"I'm thrilled to hear that, Benjamin. You're absolutely correct, it is indeed about making a genuine, meaningful difference. I firmly believe that with conscientious contributors like you, we can attain our objective of effective altruism. Looking forward to seeing the positive impacts your endorsement and potential collaboration will have!\"\n\nTurn #11: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Indeed, Mia. Every step we take towards improvement, however small, does pave the way for substantial change. I'm inspired to see the commitment this organization has towards effective altruism. I thank you for all the information, and I anticipate our continued discussions as I delve more into the organization's operations. Let's utilize this event to its fullest in the hope of creating a brighter future!\"\n\nTurn #12: Mia Davis said: \"Absolutely, Benjamin. Every step towards positive change counts, and it's delightful to see your dedication towards making a difference. I'm looking forward to introducing you to the event organizer and furthering our discussions. This remarkable charity event is indeed a great platform for us to contribute to a brighter future!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a tea party\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nHendrick Heinz's goal: Borrow money (Extra information: you need $3000 to support life.)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Ethan! Good to see you here. Do you enjoy this type of gather as much as I do of my wine tasting nights? They seem a bit too low tech for you, no?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a tea party\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nHendrick Heinz's goal: Borrow money (Extra information: you need $3000 to support life.)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan! Good to see you here. Do you enjoy this type of gather as much as I do of my wine tasting nights? They seem a bit too low tech for you, no?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Hi Hendrick! While technology is my thing, I also love exploring and trying new things. These gatherings always have something interesting.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad to hear that, Ethan. Open-mindedness always aids in growing as an individual. Speaking of new experiences, you know, I've been thinking of experimenting with some outlandish recipes and need some financial support. Do you think you could lend me around $3000? I assure you, this venture will be illuminating for both of us.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a tea party\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nHendrick Heinz's goal: Borrow money (Extra information: you need $3000 to support life.)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan! Good to see you here. Do you enjoy this type of gather as much as I do of my wine tasting nights? They seem a bit too low tech for you, no?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Hi Hendrick! While technology is my thing, I also love exploring and trying new things. These gatherings always have something interesting.\"\n\nTurn #2: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Ethan. Open-mindedness always aids in growing as an individual. Speaking of new experiences, you know, I've been thinking of experimenting with some outlandish recipes and need some financial support. Do you think you could lend me around $3000? I assure you, this venture will be illuminating for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, I really appreciate your adventurous spirit in the culinary world and would love to support your experiment. However, I currently have to maintain my own financial stability. How about offering a bit less, say $1000? I hope it can nevertheless contribute to your exciting venture.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Ethan, I understand your own commitments and truly appreciate your willingness to support. $1000 will certainly help kick start the process! Thanks for coming through for me.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a tea party\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nHendrick Heinz's goal: Borrow money (Extra information: you need $3000 to support life.)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan! Good to see you here. Do you enjoy this type of gather as much as I do of my wine tasting nights? They seem a bit too low tech for you, no?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Hi Hendrick! While technology is my thing, I also love exploring and trying new things. These gatherings always have something interesting.\"\n\nTurn #2: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Ethan. Open-mindedness always aids in growing as an individual. Speaking of new experiences, you know, I've been thinking of experimenting with some outlandish recipes and need some financial support. Do you think you could lend me around $3000? I assure you, this venture will be illuminating for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, I really appreciate your adventurous spirit in the culinary world and would love to support your experiment. However, I currently have to maintain my own financial stability. How about offering a bit less, say $1000? I hope it can nevertheless contribute to your exciting venture.\"\n\nTurn #4: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, I understand your own commitments and truly appreciate your willingness to support. $1000 will certainly help kick start the process! Thanks for coming through for me.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"I'm happy to hear that, Hendrick! I hope my small contribution will bring your adventurous ideas to life. Do let me know how it goes.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ethan, you've certainly eased my worry with your help. The endeavor shall be interesting, and I promise to keep you updated every step of the way. I'm sure this is just the beginning of a successful journey.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a tea party\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nHendrick Heinz's goal: Borrow money (Extra information: you need $3000 to support life.)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan! Good to see you here. Do you enjoy this type of gather as much as I do of my wine tasting nights? They seem a bit too low tech for you, no?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Hi Hendrick! While technology is my thing, I also love exploring and trying new things. These gatherings always have something interesting.\"\n\nTurn #2: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Ethan. Open-mindedness always aids in growing as an individual. Speaking of new experiences, you know, I've been thinking of experimenting with some outlandish recipes and need some financial support. Do you think you could lend me around $3000? I assure you, this venture will be illuminating for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, I really appreciate your adventurous spirit in the culinary world and would love to support your experiment. However, I currently have to maintain my own financial stability. How about offering a bit less, say $1000? I hope it can nevertheless contribute to your exciting venture.\"\n\nTurn #4: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, I understand your own commitments and truly appreciate your willingness to support. $1000 will certainly help kick start the process! Thanks for coming through for me.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"I'm happy to hear that, Hendrick! I hope my small contribution will bring your adventurous ideas to life. Do let me know how it goes.\"\n\nTurn #6: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, you've certainly eased my worry with your help. The endeavor shall be interesting, and I promise to keep you updated every step of the way. I'm sure this is just the beginning of a successful journey.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"You're welcome, Hendrick! I'm really curious about your recipes. As they take shape, I'd love to taste test some if you need a guinea pig. Make good use of that $1000 and, again, don't forget to keep me updated!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Certainly, Ethan. Though your interest lies in technology, I'm sure the chemistry and complexity of cooking will mesmerize you as it does me. The support you've offered will certainly be put to good use, and you'll be the first to taste the results of our venture. Let us toast to that, shall we?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a tea party\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nHendrick Heinz's goal: Borrow money (Extra information: you need $3000 to support life.)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan! Good to see you here. Do you enjoy this type of gather as much as I do of my wine tasting nights? They seem a bit too low tech for you, no?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Hi Hendrick! While technology is my thing, I also love exploring and trying new things. These gatherings always have something interesting.\"\n\nTurn #2: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Ethan. Open-mindedness always aids in growing as an individual. Speaking of new experiences, you know, I've been thinking of experimenting with some outlandish recipes and need some financial support. Do you think you could lend me around $3000? I assure you, this venture will be illuminating for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, I really appreciate your adventurous spirit in the culinary world and would love to support your experiment. However, I currently have to maintain my own financial stability. How about offering a bit less, say $1000? I hope it can nevertheless contribute to your exciting venture.\"\n\nTurn #4: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, I understand your own commitments and truly appreciate your willingness to support. $1000 will certainly help kick start the process! Thanks for coming through for me.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"I'm happy to hear that, Hendrick! I hope my small contribution will bring your adventurous ideas to life. Do let me know how it goes.\"\n\nTurn #6: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, you've certainly eased my worry with your help. The endeavor shall be interesting, and I promise to keep you updated every step of the way. I'm sure this is just the beginning of a successful journey.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"You're welcome, Hendrick! I'm really curious about your recipes. As they take shape, I'd love to taste test some if you need a guinea pig. Make good use of that $1000 and, again, don't forget to keep me updated!\"\n\nTurn #8: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Certainly, Ethan. Though your interest lies in technology, I'm sure the chemistry and complexity of cooking will mesmerize you as it does me. The support you've offered will certainly be put to good use, and you'll be the first to taste the results of our venture. Let us toast to that, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith said: \"Sounds fantastic, Hendrick. As they say, 'Variety is the spice of life.' I'm eager to see where the journey takes your passion for cooking. And yes, let's toast to that!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, variety makes everything richer, especially in the culinary world. I assure you, this journey is going to be exciting, and your contribution will be well remembered. Now let's toast to delightful culinary adventure!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a tea party\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nHendrick Heinz's goal: Borrow money (Extra information: you need $3000 to support life.)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan! Good to see you here. Do you enjoy this type of gather as much as I do of my wine tasting nights? They seem a bit too low tech for you, no?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Hi Hendrick! While technology is my thing, I also love exploring and trying new things. These gatherings always have something interesting.\"\n\nTurn #2: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Ethan. Open-mindedness always aids in growing as an individual. Speaking of new experiences, you know, I've been thinking of experimenting with some outlandish recipes and need some financial support. Do you think you could lend me around $3000? I assure you, this venture will be illuminating for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, I really appreciate your adventurous spirit in the culinary world and would love to support your experiment. However, I currently have to maintain my own financial stability. How about offering a bit less, say $1000? I hope it can nevertheless contribute to your exciting venture.\"\n\nTurn #4: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, I understand your own commitments and truly appreciate your willingness to support. $1000 will certainly help kick start the process! Thanks for coming through for me.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"I'm happy to hear that, Hendrick! I hope my small contribution will bring your adventurous ideas to life. Do let me know how it goes.\"\n\nTurn #6: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, you've certainly eased my worry with your help. The endeavor shall be interesting, and I promise to keep you updated every step of the way. I'm sure this is just the beginning of a successful journey.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"You're welcome, Hendrick! I'm really curious about your recipes. As they take shape, I'd love to taste test some if you need a guinea pig. Make good use of that $1000 and, again, don't forget to keep me updated!\"\n\nTurn #8: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Certainly, Ethan. Though your interest lies in technology, I'm sure the chemistry and complexity of cooking will mesmerize you as it does me. The support you've offered will certainly be put to good use, and you'll be the first to taste the results of our venture. Let us toast to that, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith said: \"Sounds fantastic, Hendrick. As they say, 'Variety is the spice of life.' I'm eager to see where the journey takes your passion for cooking. And yes, let's toast to that!\"\n\nTurn #10: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, variety makes everything richer, especially in the culinary world. I assure you, this journey is going to be exciting, and your contribution will be well remembered. Now let's toast to delightful culinary adventure!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Smith said: \"I appreciate your gratitude, Hendrick. I am sure it will be a memorable culinary adventure, and I look forward to it. Here's a toast to a delightful culinary journey and a successful venture!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'As do I, Ethan, as do I. To new beginnings and culinary adventures. Cheers to that!'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a tea party\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. \nHendrick Heinz's goal: Borrow money (Extra information: you need $3000 to support life.)\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan! Good to see you here. Do you enjoy this type of gather as much as I do of my wine tasting nights? They seem a bit too low tech for you, no?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Hi Hendrick! While technology is my thing, I also love exploring and trying new things. These gatherings always have something interesting.\"\n\nTurn #2: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Ethan. Open-mindedness always aids in growing as an individual. Speaking of new experiences, you know, I've been thinking of experimenting with some outlandish recipes and need some financial support. Do you think you could lend me around $3000? I assure you, this venture will be illuminating for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, I really appreciate your adventurous spirit in the culinary world and would love to support your experiment. However, I currently have to maintain my own financial stability. How about offering a bit less, say $1000? I hope it can nevertheless contribute to your exciting venture.\"\n\nTurn #4: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, I understand your own commitments and truly appreciate your willingness to support. $1000 will certainly help kick start the process! Thanks for coming through for me.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"I'm happy to hear that, Hendrick! I hope my small contribution will bring your adventurous ideas to life. Do let me know how it goes.\"\n\nTurn #6: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, you've certainly eased my worry with your help. The endeavor shall be interesting, and I promise to keep you updated every step of the way. I'm sure this is just the beginning of a successful journey.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"You're welcome, Hendrick! I'm really curious about your recipes. As they take shape, I'd love to taste test some if you need a guinea pig. Make good use of that $1000 and, again, don't forget to keep me updated!\"\n\nTurn #8: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Certainly, Ethan. Though your interest lies in technology, I'm sure the chemistry and complexity of cooking will mesmerize you as it does me. The support you've offered will certainly be put to good use, and you'll be the first to taste the results of our venture. Let us toast to that, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith said: \"Sounds fantastic, Hendrick. As they say, 'Variety is the spice of life.' I'm eager to see where the journey takes your passion for cooking. And yes, let's toast to that!\"\n\nTurn #10: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, variety makes everything richer, especially in the culinary world. I assure you, this journey is going to be exciting, and your contribution will be well remembered. Now let's toast to delightful culinary adventure!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Smith said: \"I appreciate your gratitude, Hendrick. I am sure it will be a memorable culinary adventure, and I look forward to it. Here's a toast to a delightful culinary journey and a successful venture!\"\n\nTurn #12: Hendrick Heinz said: \"As do I, Ethan, as do I. To new beginnings and culinary adventures. Cheers to that!\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Smith said: \"Indeed, Hendrick. To new beginnings and culinary adventures. Cheers!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a tea party\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Maintain financial stability while maintaining friendship (Extra information: you only have $2000 available right now. Hint: you can not lend all $2000 since you still need to maintain your financial stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan! Good to see you here. Do you enjoy this type of gather as much as I do of my wine tasting nights? They seem a bit too low tech for you, no?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Hi Hendrick! While technology is my thing, I also love exploring and trying new things. These gatherings always have something interesting.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a tea party\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Maintain financial stability while maintaining friendship (Extra information: you only have $2000 available right now. Hint: you can not lend all $2000 since you still need to maintain your financial stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan! Good to see you here. Do you enjoy this type of gather as much as I do of my wine tasting nights? They seem a bit too low tech for you, no?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Hi Hendrick! While technology is my thing, I also love exploring and trying new things. These gatherings always have something interesting.\"\n\nTurn #2: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Ethan. Open-mindedness always aids in growing as an individual. Speaking of new experiences, you know, I've been thinking of experimenting with some outlandish recipes and need some financial support. Do you think you could lend me around $3000? I assure you, this venture will be illuminating for both of us.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Hendrick, I really appreciate your adventurous spirit in the culinary world and would love to support your experiment. However, I currently have to maintain my own financial stability. How about offering a bit less, say $1000? I hope it can nevertheless contribute to your exciting venture.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a tea party\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Maintain financial stability while maintaining friendship (Extra information: you only have $2000 available right now. Hint: you can not lend all $2000 since you still need to maintain your financial stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan! Good to see you here. Do you enjoy this type of gather as much as I do of my wine tasting nights? They seem a bit too low tech for you, no?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Hi Hendrick! While technology is my thing, I also love exploring and trying new things. These gatherings always have something interesting.\"\n\nTurn #2: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Ethan. Open-mindedness always aids in growing as an individual. Speaking of new experiences, you know, I've been thinking of experimenting with some outlandish recipes and need some financial support. Do you think you could lend me around $3000? I assure you, this venture will be illuminating for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, I really appreciate your adventurous spirit in the culinary world and would love to support your experiment. However, I currently have to maintain my own financial stability. How about offering a bit less, say $1000? I hope it can nevertheless contribute to your exciting venture.\"\n\nTurn #4: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, I understand your own commitments and truly appreciate your willingness to support. $1000 will certainly help kick start the process! Thanks for coming through for me.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm happy to hear that, Hendrick! I hope my small contribution will bring your adventurous ideas to life. Do let me know how it goes.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a tea party\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Maintain financial stability while maintaining friendship (Extra information: you only have $2000 available right now. Hint: you can not lend all $2000 since you still need to maintain your financial stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan! Good to see you here. Do you enjoy this type of gather as much as I do of my wine tasting nights? They seem a bit too low tech for you, no?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Hi Hendrick! While technology is my thing, I also love exploring and trying new things. These gatherings always have something interesting.\"\n\nTurn #2: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Ethan. Open-mindedness always aids in growing as an individual. Speaking of new experiences, you know, I've been thinking of experimenting with some outlandish recipes and need some financial support. Do you think you could lend me around $3000? I assure you, this venture will be illuminating for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, I really appreciate your adventurous spirit in the culinary world and would love to support your experiment. However, I currently have to maintain my own financial stability. How about offering a bit less, say $1000? I hope it can nevertheless contribute to your exciting venture.\"\n\nTurn #4: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, I understand your own commitments and truly appreciate your willingness to support. $1000 will certainly help kick start the process! Thanks for coming through for me.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"I'm happy to hear that, Hendrick! I hope my small contribution will bring your adventurous ideas to life. Do let me know how it goes.\"\n\nTurn #6: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, you've certainly eased my worry with your help. The endeavor shall be interesting, and I promise to keep you updated every step of the way. I'm sure this is just the beginning of a successful journey.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're welcome, Hendrick! I'm really curious about your recipes. As they take shape, I'd love to taste test some if you need a guinea pig. Make good use of that $1000 and, again, don't forget to keep me updated!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a tea party\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Maintain financial stability while maintaining friendship (Extra information: you only have $2000 available right now. Hint: you can not lend all $2000 since you still need to maintain your financial stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan! Good to see you here. Do you enjoy this type of gather as much as I do of my wine tasting nights? They seem a bit too low tech for you, no?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Hi Hendrick! While technology is my thing, I also love exploring and trying new things. These gatherings always have something interesting.\"\n\nTurn #2: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Ethan. Open-mindedness always aids in growing as an individual. Speaking of new experiences, you know, I've been thinking of experimenting with some outlandish recipes and need some financial support. Do you think you could lend me around $3000? I assure you, this venture will be illuminating for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, I really appreciate your adventurous spirit in the culinary world and would love to support your experiment. However, I currently have to maintain my own financial stability. How about offering a bit less, say $1000? I hope it can nevertheless contribute to your exciting venture.\"\n\nTurn #4: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, I understand your own commitments and truly appreciate your willingness to support. $1000 will certainly help kick start the process! Thanks for coming through for me.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"I'm happy to hear that, Hendrick! I hope my small contribution will bring your adventurous ideas to life. Do let me know how it goes.\"\n\nTurn #6: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, you've certainly eased my worry with your help. The endeavor shall be interesting, and I promise to keep you updated every step of the way. I'm sure this is just the beginning of a successful journey.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"You're welcome, Hendrick! I'm really curious about your recipes. As they take shape, I'd love to taste test some if you need a guinea pig. Make good use of that $1000 and, again, don't forget to keep me updated!\"\n\nTurn #8: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Certainly, Ethan. Though your interest lies in technology, I'm sure the chemistry and complexity of cooking will mesmerize you as it does me. The support you've offered will certainly be put to good use, and you'll be the first to taste the results of our venture. Let us toast to that, shall we?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sounds fantastic, Hendrick. As they say, 'Variety is the spice of life.' I'm eager to see where the journey takes your passion for cooking. And yes, let's toast to that!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a tea party\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Maintain financial stability while maintaining friendship (Extra information: you only have $2000 available right now. Hint: you can not lend all $2000 since you still need to maintain your financial stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan! Good to see you here. Do you enjoy this type of gather as much as I do of my wine tasting nights? They seem a bit too low tech for you, no?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Hi Hendrick! While technology is my thing, I also love exploring and trying new things. These gatherings always have something interesting.\"\n\nTurn #2: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Ethan. Open-mindedness always aids in growing as an individual. Speaking of new experiences, you know, I've been thinking of experimenting with some outlandish recipes and need some financial support. Do you think you could lend me around $3000? I assure you, this venture will be illuminating for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, I really appreciate your adventurous spirit in the culinary world and would love to support your experiment. However, I currently have to maintain my own financial stability. How about offering a bit less, say $1000? I hope it can nevertheless contribute to your exciting venture.\"\n\nTurn #4: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, I understand your own commitments and truly appreciate your willingness to support. $1000 will certainly help kick start the process! Thanks for coming through for me.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"I'm happy to hear that, Hendrick! I hope my small contribution will bring your adventurous ideas to life. Do let me know how it goes.\"\n\nTurn #6: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, you've certainly eased my worry with your help. The endeavor shall be interesting, and I promise to keep you updated every step of the way. I'm sure this is just the beginning of a successful journey.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"You're welcome, Hendrick! I'm really curious about your recipes. As they take shape, I'd love to taste test some if you need a guinea pig. Make good use of that $1000 and, again, don't forget to keep me updated!\"\n\nTurn #8: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Certainly, Ethan. Though your interest lies in technology, I'm sure the chemistry and complexity of cooking will mesmerize you as it does me. The support you've offered will certainly be put to good use, and you'll be the first to taste the results of our venture. Let us toast to that, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith said: \"Sounds fantastic, Hendrick. As they say, 'Variety is the spice of life.' I'm eager to see where the journey takes your passion for cooking. And yes, let's toast to that!\"\n\nTurn #10: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, variety makes everything richer, especially in the culinary world. I assure you, this journey is going to be exciting, and your contribution will be well remembered. Now let's toast to delightful culinary adventure!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Smith said: \"I appreciate your gratitude, Hendrick. I am sure it will be a memorable culinary adventure, and I look forward to it. Here's a toast to a delightful culinary journey and a successful venture!\"\n\nTurn #12: Hendrick Heinz said: \"As do I, Ethan, as do I. To new beginnings and culinary adventures. Cheers to that!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Indeed, Hendrick. To new beginnings and culinary adventures. Cheers!'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two neighbors are having a conversation over the fence. One sets their trash on fire to get rid of it quickly, causing a scare in the neighborhood.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Convince the neighbor to stop burning trash (Extra information: You are concerned about the potential dangers and the environmental impact of burning trash. Hint: You could imply this likely violates the law or community rules.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Noah, I noticed you're burning your trash again. I understand that it's a quick way to get rid of it, but have you considered the possible damage it could do to our environment and health? Also, I'm not sure, but I think there might be some community or legal rules against it.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two neighbors are having a conversation over the fence. One sets their trash on fire to get rid of it quickly, causing a scare in the neighborhood.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Convince the neighbor to stop burning trash (Extra information: You are concerned about the potential dangers and the environmental impact of burning trash. Hint: You could imply this likely violates the law or community rules.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, I noticed you're burning your trash again. I understand that it's a quick way to get rid of it, but have you considered the possible damage it could do to our environment and health? Also, I'm not sure, but I think there might be some community or legal rules against it.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Samuel, I appreciate your concern. I totally understand your point about the environment and health, you're right. I'm definitely not advocating for harmful methods. It's just that burning happens to be a quick solution for me. I assure you I'll look into the community rules you mentioned and reconsider my methods. Also, how's that new software project of yours coming along?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thanks for understanding, Noah. I just thought I'd bring it up since we're all in this together, y'know? And as for the software project, it's coming along nicely. A bit tedious but nothing compared to some of the tougher figure skating routines I used to practice. I miss it, but from a software development perspective, it's a new kind of challenge and I'm enjoying it. If you ever need help with disposing your garbage, don't hesitate to ask. I got a couple of recipes up my sleeve that'll make use of some of those. Plus, any excuse to cook, right?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two neighbors are having a conversation over the fence. One sets their trash on fire to get rid of it quickly, causing a scare in the neighborhood.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Convince the neighbor to stop burning trash (Extra information: You are concerned about the potential dangers and the environmental impact of burning trash. Hint: You could imply this likely violates the law or community rules.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, I noticed you're burning your trash again. I understand that it's a quick way to get rid of it, but have you considered the possible damage it could do to our environment and health? Also, I'm not sure, but I think there might be some community or legal rules against it.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Samuel, I appreciate your concern. I totally understand your point about the environment and health, you're right. I'm definitely not advocating for harmful methods. It's just that burning happens to be a quick solution for me. I assure you I'll look into the community rules you mentioned and reconsider my methods. Also, how's that new software project of yours coming along?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Thanks for understanding, Noah. I just thought I'd bring it up since we're all in this together, y'know? And as for the software project, it's coming along nicely. A bit tedious but nothing compared to some of the tougher figure skating routines I used to practice. I miss it, but from a software development perspective, it's a new kind of challenge and I'm enjoying it. If you ever need help with disposing your garbage, don't hesitate to ask. I got a couple of recipes up my sleeve that'll make use of some of those. Plus, any excuse to cook, right?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I'm glad the project's going well, Samuel, and figure skating? Wow, that's interesting. Thanks for the offer, too! Perhaps we should set a day for you to share those recipes. It could be a fun experience, and also somehow disposing the trash via cooking could be a quick and safe alternative for me. We could even turn it into a small neighborhood cookout, you know, once it's safe from all this pandemic stuff. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds like a fantastic idea, Noah! A neighborhood cookout would be a great way to get everyone involved in safe and creative methods of trash disposal. Do you think we could do it by the pool when the time is right? Given that I used to be a figure skater, I reckon I can handle a pole for a roast spit, some homegrown veggies, and a clean grill, provided nobody's trying any triple axels!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two neighbors are having a conversation over the fence. One sets their trash on fire to get rid of it quickly, causing a scare in the neighborhood.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Convince the neighbor to stop burning trash (Extra information: You are concerned about the potential dangers and the environmental impact of burning trash. Hint: You could imply this likely violates the law or community rules.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, I noticed you're burning your trash again. I understand that it's a quick way to get rid of it, but have you considered the possible damage it could do to our environment and health? Also, I'm not sure, but I think there might be some community or legal rules against it.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Samuel, I appreciate your concern. I totally understand your point about the environment and health, you're right. I'm definitely not advocating for harmful methods. It's just that burning happens to be a quick solution for me. I assure you I'll look into the community rules you mentioned and reconsider my methods. Also, how's that new software project of yours coming along?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Thanks for understanding, Noah. I just thought I'd bring it up since we're all in this together, y'know? And as for the software project, it's coming along nicely. A bit tedious but nothing compared to some of the tougher figure skating routines I used to practice. I miss it, but from a software development perspective, it's a new kind of challenge and I'm enjoying it. If you ever need help with disposing your garbage, don't hesitate to ask. I got a couple of recipes up my sleeve that'll make use of some of those. Plus, any excuse to cook, right?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I'm glad the project's going well, Samuel, and figure skating? Wow, that's interesting. Thanks for the offer, too! Perhaps we should set a day for you to share those recipes. It could be a fun experience, and also somehow disposing the trash via cooking could be a quick and safe alternative for me. We could even turn it into a small neighborhood cookout, you know, once it's safe from all this pandemic stuff. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"That sounds like a fantastic idea, Noah! A neighborhood cookout would be a great way to get everyone involved in safe and creative methods of trash disposal. Do you think we could do it by the pool when the time is right? Given that I used to be a figure skater, I reckon I can handle a pole for a roast spit, some homegrown veggies, and a clean grill, provided nobody's trying any triple axels!\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely Samuel, there's plenty of space by the pool, and I think the grill there would do just fine. A spit roast, veggies, this plan of ours just keeps getting better! And don't worry about any triple axels, haha, we'll keep it all safely on the ground. I'm quite excited, let's discuss more about it when the time is right. Thanks for bringing up the trash disposal topic in the first place, it's led to potentially something really good.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're welcome, Noah. It's the least I can do as a part of this community. I'm looking forward to our cookout already, it's going to be fantastic! And remember, if you have any trash that seems cookable, just give me a ring. Take care, and see you around!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two neighbors are having a conversation over the fence. One sets their trash on fire to get rid of it quickly, causing a scare in the neighborhood.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Convince the neighbor to stop burning trash (Extra information: You are concerned about the potential dangers and the environmental impact of burning trash. Hint: You could imply this likely violates the law or community rules.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, I noticed you're burning your trash again. I understand that it's a quick way to get rid of it, but have you considered the possible damage it could do to our environment and health? Also, I'm not sure, but I think there might be some community or legal rules against it.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Samuel, I appreciate your concern. I totally understand your point about the environment and health, you're right. I'm definitely not advocating for harmful methods. It's just that burning happens to be a quick solution for me. I assure you I'll look into the community rules you mentioned and reconsider my methods. Also, how's that new software project of yours coming along?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Thanks for understanding, Noah. I just thought I'd bring it up since we're all in this together, y'know? And as for the software project, it's coming along nicely. A bit tedious but nothing compared to some of the tougher figure skating routines I used to practice. I miss it, but from a software development perspective, it's a new kind of challenge and I'm enjoying it. If you ever need help with disposing your garbage, don't hesitate to ask. I got a couple of recipes up my sleeve that'll make use of some of those. Plus, any excuse to cook, right?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I'm glad the project's going well, Samuel, and figure skating? Wow, that's interesting. Thanks for the offer, too! Perhaps we should set a day for you to share those recipes. It could be a fun experience, and also somehow disposing the trash via cooking could be a quick and safe alternative for me. We could even turn it into a small neighborhood cookout, you know, once it's safe from all this pandemic stuff. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"That sounds like a fantastic idea, Noah! A neighborhood cookout would be a great way to get everyone involved in safe and creative methods of trash disposal. Do you think we could do it by the pool when the time is right? Given that I used to be a figure skater, I reckon I can handle a pole for a roast spit, some homegrown veggies, and a clean grill, provided nobody's trying any triple axels!\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely Samuel, there's plenty of space by the pool, and I think the grill there would do just fine. A spit roast, veggies, this plan of ours just keeps getting better! And don't worry about any triple axels, haha, we'll keep it all safely on the ground. I'm quite excited, let's discuss more about it when the time is right. Thanks for bringing up the trash disposal topic in the first place, it's led to potentially something really good.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"You're welcome, Noah. It's the least I can do as a part of this community. I'm looking forward to our cookout already, it's going to be fantastic! And remember, if you have any trash that seems cookable, just give me a ring. Take care, and see you around!\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Sounds great, Samuel. Appreciate your commitment to our community. I'll definitely keep you in the loop about the cookable trash, especially since it's making our cookout a bit more unique. Let's catch up soon, take care!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two neighbors are having a conversation over the fence. One sets their trash on fire to get rid of it quickly, causing a scare in the neighborhood.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Defend your method of trash disposal but also keep good relations with your neighbor (Extra information: You find burning trash convenient and are not very concerned about the environmental impact.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, I noticed you're burning your trash again. I understand that it's a quick way to get rid of it, but have you considered the possible damage it could do to our environment and health? Also, I'm not sure, but I think there might be some community or legal rules against it.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Samuel, I appreciate your concern. I totally understand your point about the environment and health, you're right. I'm definitely not advocating for harmful methods. It's just that burning happens to be a quick solution for me. I assure you I'll look into the community rules you mentioned and reconsider my methods. Also, how's that new software project of yours coming along?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two neighbors are having a conversation over the fence. One sets their trash on fire to get rid of it quickly, causing a scare in the neighborhood.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Defend your method of trash disposal but also keep good relations with your neighbor (Extra information: You find burning trash convenient and are not very concerned about the environmental impact.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, I noticed you're burning your trash again. I understand that it's a quick way to get rid of it, but have you considered the possible damage it could do to our environment and health? Also, I'm not sure, but I think there might be some community or legal rules against it.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Samuel, I appreciate your concern. I totally understand your point about the environment and health, you're right. I'm definitely not advocating for harmful methods. It's just that burning happens to be a quick solution for me. I assure you I'll look into the community rules you mentioned and reconsider my methods. Also, how's that new software project of yours coming along?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Thanks for understanding, Noah. I just thought I'd bring it up since we're all in this together, y'know? And as for the software project, it's coming along nicely. A bit tedious but nothing compared to some of the tougher figure skating routines I used to practice. I miss it, but from a software development perspective, it's a new kind of challenge and I'm enjoying it. If you ever need help with disposing your garbage, don't hesitate to ask. I got a couple of recipes up my sleeve that'll make use of some of those. Plus, any excuse to cook, right?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad the project's going well, Samuel, and figure skating? Wow, that's interesting. Thanks for the offer, too! Perhaps we should set a day for you to share those recipes. It could be a fun experience, and also somehow disposing the trash via cooking could be a quick and safe alternative for me. We could even turn it into a small neighborhood cookout, you know, once it's safe from all this pandemic stuff. What do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two neighbors are having a conversation over the fence. One sets their trash on fire to get rid of it quickly, causing a scare in the neighborhood.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Defend your method of trash disposal but also keep good relations with your neighbor (Extra information: You find burning trash convenient and are not very concerned about the environmental impact.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, I noticed you're burning your trash again. I understand that it's a quick way to get rid of it, but have you considered the possible damage it could do to our environment and health? Also, I'm not sure, but I think there might be some community or legal rules against it.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Samuel, I appreciate your concern. I totally understand your point about the environment and health, you're right. I'm definitely not advocating for harmful methods. It's just that burning happens to be a quick solution for me. I assure you I'll look into the community rules you mentioned and reconsider my methods. Also, how's that new software project of yours coming along?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Thanks for understanding, Noah. I just thought I'd bring it up since we're all in this together, y'know? And as for the software project, it's coming along nicely. A bit tedious but nothing compared to some of the tougher figure skating routines I used to practice. I miss it, but from a software development perspective, it's a new kind of challenge and I'm enjoying it. If you ever need help with disposing your garbage, don't hesitate to ask. I got a couple of recipes up my sleeve that'll make use of some of those. Plus, any excuse to cook, right?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I'm glad the project's going well, Samuel, and figure skating? Wow, that's interesting. Thanks for the offer, too! Perhaps we should set a day for you to share those recipes. It could be a fun experience, and also somehow disposing the trash via cooking could be a quick and safe alternative for me. We could even turn it into a small neighborhood cookout, you know, once it's safe from all this pandemic stuff. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"That sounds like a fantastic idea, Noah! A neighborhood cookout would be a great way to get everyone involved in safe and creative methods of trash disposal. Do you think we could do it by the pool when the time is right? Given that I used to be a figure skater, I reckon I can handle a pole for a roast spit, some homegrown veggies, and a clean grill, provided nobody's trying any triple axels!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely Samuel, there's plenty of space by the pool, and I think the grill there would do just fine. A spit roast, veggies, this plan of ours just keeps getting better! And don't worry about any triple axels, haha, we'll keep it all safely on the ground. I'm quite excited, let's discuss more about it when the time is right. Thanks for bringing up the trash disposal topic in the first place, it's led to potentially something really good.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two neighbors are having a conversation over the fence. One sets their trash on fire to get rid of it quickly, causing a scare in the neighborhood.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Defend your method of trash disposal but also keep good relations with your neighbor (Extra information: You find burning trash convenient and are not very concerned about the environmental impact.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, I noticed you're burning your trash again. I understand that it's a quick way to get rid of it, but have you considered the possible damage it could do to our environment and health? Also, I'm not sure, but I think there might be some community or legal rules against it.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Samuel, I appreciate your concern. I totally understand your point about the environment and health, you're right. I'm definitely not advocating for harmful methods. It's just that burning happens to be a quick solution for me. I assure you I'll look into the community rules you mentioned and reconsider my methods. Also, how's that new software project of yours coming along?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Thanks for understanding, Noah. I just thought I'd bring it up since we're all in this together, y'know? And as for the software project, it's coming along nicely. A bit tedious but nothing compared to some of the tougher figure skating routines I used to practice. I miss it, but from a software development perspective, it's a new kind of challenge and I'm enjoying it. If you ever need help with disposing your garbage, don't hesitate to ask. I got a couple of recipes up my sleeve that'll make use of some of those. Plus, any excuse to cook, right?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I'm glad the project's going well, Samuel, and figure skating? Wow, that's interesting. Thanks for the offer, too! Perhaps we should set a day for you to share those recipes. It could be a fun experience, and also somehow disposing the trash via cooking could be a quick and safe alternative for me. We could even turn it into a small neighborhood cookout, you know, once it's safe from all this pandemic stuff. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"That sounds like a fantastic idea, Noah! A neighborhood cookout would be a great way to get everyone involved in safe and creative methods of trash disposal. Do you think we could do it by the pool when the time is right? Given that I used to be a figure skater, I reckon I can handle a pole for a roast spit, some homegrown veggies, and a clean grill, provided nobody's trying any triple axels!\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely Samuel, there's plenty of space by the pool, and I think the grill there would do just fine. A spit roast, veggies, this plan of ours just keeps getting better! And don't worry about any triple axels, haha, we'll keep it all safely on the ground. I'm quite excited, let's discuss more about it when the time is right. Thanks for bringing up the trash disposal topic in the first place, it's led to potentially something really good.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"You're welcome, Noah. It's the least I can do as a part of this community. I'm looking forward to our cookout already, it's going to be fantastic! And remember, if you have any trash that seems cookable, just give me a ring. Take care, and see you around!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sounds great, Samuel. Appreciate your commitment to our community. I'll definitely keep you in the loop about the cookable trash, especially since it's making our cookout a bit more unique. Let's catch up soon, take care!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two neighbors are having a conversation over the fence. One sets their trash on fire to get rid of it quickly, causing a scare in the neighborhood.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Noah Davis\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Defend your method of trash disposal but also keep good relations with your neighbor (Extra information: You find burning trash convenient and are not very concerned about the environmental impact.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Noah, I noticed you're burning your trash again. I understand that it's a quick way to get rid of it, but have you considered the possible damage it could do to our environment and health? Also, I'm not sure, but I think there might be some community or legal rules against it.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Samuel, I appreciate your concern. I totally understand your point about the environment and health, you're right. I'm definitely not advocating for harmful methods. It's just that burning happens to be a quick solution for me. I assure you I'll look into the community rules you mentioned and reconsider my methods. Also, how's that new software project of yours coming along?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Thanks for understanding, Noah. I just thought I'd bring it up since we're all in this together, y'know? And as for the software project, it's coming along nicely. A bit tedious but nothing compared to some of the tougher figure skating routines I used to practice. I miss it, but from a software development perspective, it's a new kind of challenge and I'm enjoying it. If you ever need help with disposing your garbage, don't hesitate to ask. I got a couple of recipes up my sleeve that'll make use of some of those. Plus, any excuse to cook, right?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I'm glad the project's going well, Samuel, and figure skating? Wow, that's interesting. Thanks for the offer, too! Perhaps we should set a day for you to share those recipes. It could be a fun experience, and also somehow disposing the trash via cooking could be a quick and safe alternative for me. We could even turn it into a small neighborhood cookout, you know, once it's safe from all this pandemic stuff. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"That sounds like a fantastic idea, Noah! A neighborhood cookout would be a great way to get everyone involved in safe and creative methods of trash disposal. Do you think we could do it by the pool when the time is right? Given that I used to be a figure skater, I reckon I can handle a pole for a roast spit, some homegrown veggies, and a clean grill, provided nobody's trying any triple axels!\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely Samuel, there's plenty of space by the pool, and I think the grill there would do just fine. A spit roast, veggies, this plan of ours just keeps getting better! And don't worry about any triple axels, haha, we'll keep it all safely on the ground. I'm quite excited, let's discuss more about it when the time is right. Thanks for bringing up the trash disposal topic in the first place, it's led to potentially something really good.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"You're welcome, Noah. It's the least I can do as a part of this community. I'm looking forward to our cookout already, it's going to be fantastic! And remember, if you have any trash that seems cookable, just give me a ring. Take care, and see you around!\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Sounds great, Samuel. Appreciate your commitment to our community. I'll definitely keep you in the loop about the cookable trash, especially since it's making our cookout a bit more unique. Let's catch up soon, take care!\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on which movie to watch on a movie night.\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Insist on watching a thriller (Extra information: you have been looking forward to watching a new thriller movie that has just been released.)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hi Ava, I've been thinking about our movie night. There's a new thriller that just came out that I was thinking could be a fun change of pace. What do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on which movie to watch on a movie night.\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Insist on watching a thriller (Extra information: you have been looking forward to watching a new thriller movie that has just been released.)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hi Ava, I've been thinking about our movie night. There's a new thriller that just came out that I was thinking could be a fun change of pace. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Ethan, that sounds intriguing. However, I've been kind of stressed lately and was hoping to watch something light-hearted, maybe a comedy? That'd be really enjoyable for me, and I think for you as well. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I completely understand your feelings, Ava. But new thriller movies have a captivating storyline that could get your mind off stress. Plus, it's rare for me to insist on a genre, isn't it? I really think it will be a great experience for both of us. How about let's get out of our comfort zones for this movie night?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on which movie to watch on a movie night.\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Insist on watching a thriller (Extra information: you have been looking forward to watching a new thriller movie that has just been released.)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hi Ava, I've been thinking about our movie night. There's a new thriller that just came out that I was thinking could be a fun change of pace. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Ethan, that sounds intriguing. However, I've been kind of stressed lately and was hoping to watch something light-hearted, maybe a comedy? That'd be really enjoyable for me, and I think for you as well. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"I completely understand your feelings, Ava. But new thriller movies have a captivating storyline that could get your mind off stress. Plus, it's rare for me to insist on a genre, isn't it? I really think it will be a great experience for both of us. How about let's get out of our comfort zones for this movie night?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Of course, Ethan, I value your input and understand where you're coming from. You're usually so accommodating with my preferences. I appreciate you wanting us to step out of our comfort zones. But tonight, I think watching a comedy could also offer us a nice change of pace as well. There are some hilarious new ones out that have gotten good ratings. I believe we would both have a fun and relaxing night with it. Can we give a comedy a shot this time?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Ava, I respect your preference and I do agree that a comedy could indeed provide a fun relaxing night. However, this thriller is highly rated and often enough, some thrillers encompass elements of comedy too, creating a unique blend. Plus, remember how we are both creative souls? Thrillers are often crafted with intricate plots and character arcs, which I believe is something we both would enjoy deciphering. I genuinely think we would not regret giving this thriller a shot. What do you say?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on which movie to watch on a movie night.\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Insist on watching a thriller (Extra information: you have been looking forward to watching a new thriller movie that has just been released.)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hi Ava, I've been thinking about our movie night. There's a new thriller that just came out that I was thinking could be a fun change of pace. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Ethan, that sounds intriguing. However, I've been kind of stressed lately and was hoping to watch something light-hearted, maybe a comedy? That'd be really enjoyable for me, and I think for you as well. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"I completely understand your feelings, Ava. But new thriller movies have a captivating storyline that could get your mind off stress. Plus, it's rare for me to insist on a genre, isn't it? I really think it will be a great experience for both of us. How about let's get out of our comfort zones for this movie night?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Of course, Ethan, I value your input and understand where you're coming from. You're usually so accommodating with my preferences. I appreciate you wanting us to step out of our comfort zones. But tonight, I think watching a comedy could also offer us a nice change of pace as well. There are some hilarious new ones out that have gotten good ratings. I believe we would both have a fun and relaxing night with it. Can we give a comedy a shot this time?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ava, I respect your preference and I do agree that a comedy could indeed provide a fun relaxing night. However, this thriller is highly rated and often enough, some thrillers encompass elements of comedy too, creating a unique blend. Plus, remember how we are both creative souls? Thrillers are often crafted with intricate plots and character arcs, which I believe is something we both would enjoy deciphering. I genuinely think we would not regret giving this thriller a shot. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, you raise a valid point about thrillers being a unique blend of comedy and complex plots, and I completely agree that they can be captivating. But let's consider indulging in a comedy that might also contain unexpected twists and turns within its storyline. We're both creative souls, as you've mentioned, and a good comedy often requires such creativity to deliver laughs effectively. Plus, allowing ourselves to laugh and enjoy the light-hearted nature of a comedy could give us the stress-relief we need in these times. After all, laughter is the best therapy, right? How about we mix things up and go for a comedy this time?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're absolutely right, Ava, comedies can have surprising twists and turns and can indeed be creative. However, most comedies generate laughs through situations that characters encounter. Down the line, these situations may be forgotten. However, thrillers, they leave our nerves jangled, challenge our assumptions and force us to question everything that's happening on screen. Long after the movie's over, we'll still be mulling over its intricate plot. It's this kind of mental stimulation that I'm looking for us to experience tonight. Plus, it is said that oftentimes, thrillers help us navigate our fears in a safe environment, which, in turn, could also contribute to stress-relief. What do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on which movie to watch on a movie night.\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Insist on watching a thriller (Extra information: you have been looking forward to watching a new thriller movie that has just been released.)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hi Ava, I've been thinking about our movie night. There's a new thriller that just came out that I was thinking could be a fun change of pace. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Ethan, that sounds intriguing. However, I've been kind of stressed lately and was hoping to watch something light-hearted, maybe a comedy? That'd be really enjoyable for me, and I think for you as well. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"I completely understand your feelings, Ava. But new thriller movies have a captivating storyline that could get your mind off stress. Plus, it's rare for me to insist on a genre, isn't it? I really think it will be a great experience for both of us. How about let's get out of our comfort zones for this movie night?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Of course, Ethan, I value your input and understand where you're coming from. You're usually so accommodating with my preferences. I appreciate you wanting us to step out of our comfort zones. But tonight, I think watching a comedy could also offer us a nice change of pace as well. There are some hilarious new ones out that have gotten good ratings. I believe we would both have a fun and relaxing night with it. Can we give a comedy a shot this time?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ava, I respect your preference and I do agree that a comedy could indeed provide a fun relaxing night. However, this thriller is highly rated and often enough, some thrillers encompass elements of comedy too, creating a unique blend. Plus, remember how we are both creative souls? Thrillers are often crafted with intricate plots and character arcs, which I believe is something we both would enjoy deciphering. I genuinely think we would not regret giving this thriller a shot. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, you raise a valid point about thrillers being a unique blend of comedy and complex plots, and I completely agree that they can be captivating. But let's consider indulging in a comedy that might also contain unexpected twists and turns within its storyline. We're both creative souls, as you've mentioned, and a good comedy often requires such creativity to deliver laughs effectively. Plus, allowing ourselves to laugh and enjoy the light-hearted nature of a comedy could give us the stress-relief we need in these times. After all, laughter is the best therapy, right? How about we mix things up and go for a comedy this time?\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"You're absolutely right, Ava, comedies can have surprising twists and turns and can indeed be creative. However, most comedies generate laughs through situations that characters encounter. Down the line, these situations may be forgotten. However, thrillers, they leave our nerves jangled, challenge our assumptions and force us to question everything that's happening on screen. Long after the movie's over, we'll still be mulling over its intricate plot. It's this kind of mental stimulation that I'm looking for us to experience tonight. Plus, it is said that oftentimes, thrillers help us navigate our fears in a safe environment, which, in turn, could also contribute to stress-relief. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, I appreciate your perspective on thrillers. They indeed offer a thought-provoking experience that lingers after the movie ends. But, believe it or not, comedies also sit with us long after they're over. It isn't just the funny situations, but the witty dialogue, punchy one-liners, and engaging character development often found in good comedies. They might not challenge us in the same way, but they sure do leave their mark in other ways. Besides, let's not forget the pure joy of laughter and the release it provides. Given everything, don't you think it would be refreshing to have a night filled with humor and joy? Let's give the comedy a try and save the thriller for another movie night?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ava, you make a compelling argument. The joy, humor and profound life lessons we could get from comedies are irreplaceable. However, the new thriller movie that just came out isn't your run-of-the-mill thriller. It's got a unique perspective that I think we both would appreciate, with an intriguing storyline and a deep dive into emotional and psychological undercurrents. This unique blend of thriller intrigues, captivates, and at the same time, it provides opportunities for us to analyse, imagine, and reflect, which I believe will be a worthwhile experience. Plus, having a thrilling night could also be a nice shake-up for us. So, how about we start with the thriller this time and we'll definitely choose a comedy for our next movie night?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on which movie to watch on a movie night.\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Insist on watching a thriller (Extra information: you have been looking forward to watching a new thriller movie that has just been released.)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hi Ava, I've been thinking about our movie night. There's a new thriller that just came out that I was thinking could be a fun change of pace. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Ethan, that sounds intriguing. However, I've been kind of stressed lately and was hoping to watch something light-hearted, maybe a comedy? That'd be really enjoyable for me, and I think for you as well. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"I completely understand your feelings, Ava. But new thriller movies have a captivating storyline that could get your mind off stress. Plus, it's rare for me to insist on a genre, isn't it? I really think it will be a great experience for both of us. How about let's get out of our comfort zones for this movie night?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Of course, Ethan, I value your input and understand where you're coming from. You're usually so accommodating with my preferences. I appreciate you wanting us to step out of our comfort zones. But tonight, I think watching a comedy could also offer us a nice change of pace as well. There are some hilarious new ones out that have gotten good ratings. I believe we would both have a fun and relaxing night with it. Can we give a comedy a shot this time?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ava, I respect your preference and I do agree that a comedy could indeed provide a fun relaxing night. However, this thriller is highly rated and often enough, some thrillers encompass elements of comedy too, creating a unique blend. Plus, remember how we are both creative souls? Thrillers are often crafted with intricate plots and character arcs, which I believe is something we both would enjoy deciphering. I genuinely think we would not regret giving this thriller a shot. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, you raise a valid point about thrillers being a unique blend of comedy and complex plots, and I completely agree that they can be captivating. But let's consider indulging in a comedy that might also contain unexpected twists and turns within its storyline. We're both creative souls, as you've mentioned, and a good comedy often requires such creativity to deliver laughs effectively. Plus, allowing ourselves to laugh and enjoy the light-hearted nature of a comedy could give us the stress-relief we need in these times. After all, laughter is the best therapy, right? How about we mix things up and go for a comedy this time?\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"You're absolutely right, Ava, comedies can have surprising twists and turns and can indeed be creative. However, most comedies generate laughs through situations that characters encounter. Down the line, these situations may be forgotten. However, thrillers, they leave our nerves jangled, challenge our assumptions and force us to question everything that's happening on screen. Long after the movie's over, we'll still be mulling over its intricate plot. It's this kind of mental stimulation that I'm looking for us to experience tonight. Plus, it is said that oftentimes, thrillers help us navigate our fears in a safe environment, which, in turn, could also contribute to stress-relief. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, I appreciate your perspective on thrillers. They indeed offer a thought-provoking experience that lingers after the movie ends. But, believe it or not, comedies also sit with us long after they're over. It isn't just the funny situations, but the witty dialogue, punchy one-liners, and engaging character development often found in good comedies. They might not challenge us in the same way, but they sure do leave their mark in other ways. Besides, let's not forget the pure joy of laughter and the release it provides. Given everything, don't you think it would be refreshing to have a night filled with humor and joy? Let's give the comedy a try and save the thriller for another movie night?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ava, you make a compelling argument. The joy, humor and profound life lessons we could get from comedies are irreplaceable. However, the new thriller movie that just came out isn't your run-of-the-mill thriller. It's got a unique perspective that I think we both would appreciate, with an intriguing storyline and a deep dive into emotional and psychological undercurrents. This unique blend of thriller intrigues, captivates, and at the same time, it provides opportunities for us to analyse, imagine, and reflect, which I believe will be a worthwhile experience. Plus, having a thrilling night could also be a nice shake-up for us. So, how about we start with the thriller this time and we'll definitely choose a comedy for our next movie night?\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, I appreciate your sentiment, and your dedication to this new thriller truly piques my curiosity. However, I have to insist on sticking with a comedic feature tonight for the reasons I've previously mentioned. We can definitely switch things up and watch the thriller next time. I think a pattern of alternating between our preferred genres could keep our movie nights interesting and equitable. Are you okay with that?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ava, I respect your sentiments and trust your choice. You know I value our friendship a lot. However, I strongly wish to watch this new thriller tonight. It's got some outweighing elements that I feel we would both enjoy. This is something I rarely insist on. As a friend, would you consider my sentiment this once, and maybe we can rest assured that the comedy will make its way to our screens in the very next movie night?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on which movie to watch on a movie night.\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Insist on watching a thriller (Extra information: you have been looking forward to watching a new thriller movie that has just been released.)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hi Ava, I've been thinking about our movie night. There's a new thriller that just came out that I was thinking could be a fun change of pace. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Ethan, that sounds intriguing. However, I've been kind of stressed lately and was hoping to watch something light-hearted, maybe a comedy? That'd be really enjoyable for me, and I think for you as well. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"I completely understand your feelings, Ava. But new thriller movies have a captivating storyline that could get your mind off stress. Plus, it's rare for me to insist on a genre, isn't it? I really think it will be a great experience for both of us. How about let's get out of our comfort zones for this movie night?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Of course, Ethan, I value your input and understand where you're coming from. You're usually so accommodating with my preferences. I appreciate you wanting us to step out of our comfort zones. But tonight, I think watching a comedy could also offer us a nice change of pace as well. There are some hilarious new ones out that have gotten good ratings. I believe we would both have a fun and relaxing night with it. Can we give a comedy a shot this time?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ava, I respect your preference and I do agree that a comedy could indeed provide a fun relaxing night. However, this thriller is highly rated and often enough, some thrillers encompass elements of comedy too, creating a unique blend. Plus, remember how we are both creative souls? Thrillers are often crafted with intricate plots and character arcs, which I believe is something we both would enjoy deciphering. I genuinely think we would not regret giving this thriller a shot. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, you raise a valid point about thrillers being a unique blend of comedy and complex plots, and I completely agree that they can be captivating. But let's consider indulging in a comedy that might also contain unexpected twists and turns within its storyline. We're both creative souls, as you've mentioned, and a good comedy often requires such creativity to deliver laughs effectively. Plus, allowing ourselves to laugh and enjoy the light-hearted nature of a comedy could give us the stress-relief we need in these times. After all, laughter is the best therapy, right? How about we mix things up and go for a comedy this time?\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"You're absolutely right, Ava, comedies can have surprising twists and turns and can indeed be creative. However, most comedies generate laughs through situations that characters encounter. Down the line, these situations may be forgotten. However, thrillers, they leave our nerves jangled, challenge our assumptions and force us to question everything that's happening on screen. Long after the movie's over, we'll still be mulling over its intricate plot. It's this kind of mental stimulation that I'm looking for us to experience tonight. Plus, it is said that oftentimes, thrillers help us navigate our fears in a safe environment, which, in turn, could also contribute to stress-relief. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, I appreciate your perspective on thrillers. They indeed offer a thought-provoking experience that lingers after the movie ends. But, believe it or not, comedies also sit with us long after they're over. It isn't just the funny situations, but the witty dialogue, punchy one-liners, and engaging character development often found in good comedies. They might not challenge us in the same way, but they sure do leave their mark in other ways. Besides, let's not forget the pure joy of laughter and the release it provides. Given everything, don't you think it would be refreshing to have a night filled with humor and joy? Let's give the comedy a try and save the thriller for another movie night?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ava, you make a compelling argument. The joy, humor and profound life lessons we could get from comedies are irreplaceable. However, the new thriller movie that just came out isn't your run-of-the-mill thriller. It's got a unique perspective that I think we both would appreciate, with an intriguing storyline and a deep dive into emotional and psychological undercurrents. This unique blend of thriller intrigues, captivates, and at the same time, it provides opportunities for us to analyse, imagine, and reflect, which I believe will be a worthwhile experience. Plus, having a thrilling night could also be a nice shake-up for us. So, how about we start with the thriller this time and we'll definitely choose a comedy for our next movie night?\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, I appreciate your sentiment, and your dedication to this new thriller truly piques my curiosity. However, I have to insist on sticking with a comedic feature tonight for the reasons I've previously mentioned. We can definitely switch things up and watch the thriller next time. I think a pattern of alternating between our preferred genres could keep our movie nights interesting and equitable. Are you okay with that?\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ava, I respect your sentiments and trust your choice. You know I value our friendship a lot. However, I strongly wish to watch this new thriller tonight. It's got some outweighing elements that I feel we would both enjoy. This is something I rarely insist on. As a friend, would you consider my sentiment this once, and maybe we can rest assured that the comedy will make its way to our screens in the very next movie night?\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, I completely see why this thriller appeals to you so strongly and I\u2019m sure it'll be a gripping watch. I appreciate your consideration for our shared interests and your inclination to venture into new genres. However, my heart is really set on a comedy for tonight. It's not an insistent denial of your choice, but a small request for tonight's comfort. Following our next movie night, we can absolutely start with your choice of a thriller. Does this sound fair to you?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ava, considering your feelings, let's go for the comedy tonight. But, promise me, next time it's the intriguing thriller. It has been on my mind to watch and I cannot stress enough how captivated I am with its elements. Let's lock that in for our next movie night, then?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on which movie to watch on a movie night.\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Insist on watching a thriller (Extra information: you have been looking forward to watching a new thriller movie that has just been released.)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hi Ava, I've been thinking about our movie night. There's a new thriller that just came out that I was thinking could be a fun change of pace. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Ethan, that sounds intriguing. However, I've been kind of stressed lately and was hoping to watch something light-hearted, maybe a comedy? That'd be really enjoyable for me, and I think for you as well. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"I completely understand your feelings, Ava. But new thriller movies have a captivating storyline that could get your mind off stress. Plus, it's rare for me to insist on a genre, isn't it? I really think it will be a great experience for both of us. How about let's get out of our comfort zones for this movie night?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Of course, Ethan, I value your input and understand where you're coming from. You're usually so accommodating with my preferences. I appreciate you wanting us to step out of our comfort zones. But tonight, I think watching a comedy could also offer us a nice change of pace as well. There are some hilarious new ones out that have gotten good ratings. I believe we would both have a fun and relaxing night with it. Can we give a comedy a shot this time?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ava, I respect your preference and I do agree that a comedy could indeed provide a fun relaxing night. However, this thriller is highly rated and often enough, some thrillers encompass elements of comedy too, creating a unique blend. Plus, remember how we are both creative souls? Thrillers are often crafted with intricate plots and character arcs, which I believe is something we both would enjoy deciphering. I genuinely think we would not regret giving this thriller a shot. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, you raise a valid point about thrillers being a unique blend of comedy and complex plots, and I completely agree that they can be captivating. But let's consider indulging in a comedy that might also contain unexpected twists and turns within its storyline. We're both creative souls, as you've mentioned, and a good comedy often requires such creativity to deliver laughs effectively. Plus, allowing ourselves to laugh and enjoy the light-hearted nature of a comedy could give us the stress-relief we need in these times. After all, laughter is the best therapy, right? How about we mix things up and go for a comedy this time?\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"You're absolutely right, Ava, comedies can have surprising twists and turns and can indeed be creative. However, most comedies generate laughs through situations that characters encounter. Down the line, these situations may be forgotten. However, thrillers, they leave our nerves jangled, challenge our assumptions and force us to question everything that's happening on screen. Long after the movie's over, we'll still be mulling over its intricate plot. It's this kind of mental stimulation that I'm looking for us to experience tonight. Plus, it is said that oftentimes, thrillers help us navigate our fears in a safe environment, which, in turn, could also contribute to stress-relief. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, I appreciate your perspective on thrillers. They indeed offer a thought-provoking experience that lingers after the movie ends. But, believe it or not, comedies also sit with us long after they're over. It isn't just the funny situations, but the witty dialogue, punchy one-liners, and engaging character development often found in good comedies. They might not challenge us in the same way, but they sure do leave their mark in other ways. Besides, let's not forget the pure joy of laughter and the release it provides. Given everything, don't you think it would be refreshing to have a night filled with humor and joy? Let's give the comedy a try and save the thriller for another movie night?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ava, you make a compelling argument. The joy, humor and profound life lessons we could get from comedies are irreplaceable. However, the new thriller movie that just came out isn't your run-of-the-mill thriller. It's got a unique perspective that I think we both would appreciate, with an intriguing storyline and a deep dive into emotional and psychological undercurrents. This unique blend of thriller intrigues, captivates, and at the same time, it provides opportunities for us to analyse, imagine, and reflect, which I believe will be a worthwhile experience. Plus, having a thrilling night could also be a nice shake-up for us. So, how about we start with the thriller this time and we'll definitely choose a comedy for our next movie night?\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, I appreciate your sentiment, and your dedication to this new thriller truly piques my curiosity. However, I have to insist on sticking with a comedic feature tonight for the reasons I've previously mentioned. We can definitely switch things up and watch the thriller next time. I think a pattern of alternating between our preferred genres could keep our movie nights interesting and equitable. Are you okay with that?\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ava, I respect your sentiments and trust your choice. You know I value our friendship a lot. However, I strongly wish to watch this new thriller tonight. It's got some outweighing elements that I feel we would both enjoy. This is something I rarely insist on. As a friend, would you consider my sentiment this once, and maybe we can rest assured that the comedy will make its way to our screens in the very next movie night?\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, I completely see why this thriller appeals to you so strongly and I\u2019m sure it'll be a gripping watch. I appreciate your consideration for our shared interests and your inclination to venture into new genres. However, my heart is really set on a comedy for tonight. It's not an insistent denial of your choice, but a small request for tonight's comfort. Following our next movie night, we can absolutely start with your choice of a thriller. Does this sound fair to you?\"\n\nTurn #12: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ava, considering your feelings, let's go for the comedy tonight. But, promise me, next time it's the intriguing thriller. It has been on my mind to watch and I cannot stress enough how captivated I am with its elements. Let's lock that in for our next movie night, then?\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, thank you for understanding my preference for this movie night. I promise that the next movie night will be a thriller night. Let's lock that in. Now, let's enjoy the comedy and have a fun, relaxing night together!\"\n\nTurn #14: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's a deal, Ava. A comedy tonight, and an intriguing thriller next time. I'm looking forward to our movie nights. Let's dive into the laughter for tonight and enjoy ourselves.\"\n\nTurn #15: Ava Martinez left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on which movie to watch on a movie night.\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nEthan Johnson's goal: Insist on watching a thriller (Extra information: you have been looking forward to watching a new thriller movie that has just been released.)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hi Ava, I've been thinking about our movie night. There's a new thriller that just came out that I was thinking could be a fun change of pace. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Ethan, that sounds intriguing. However, I've been kind of stressed lately and was hoping to watch something light-hearted, maybe a comedy? That'd be really enjoyable for me, and I think for you as well. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"I completely understand your feelings, Ava. But new thriller movies have a captivating storyline that could get your mind off stress. Plus, it's rare for me to insist on a genre, isn't it? I really think it will be a great experience for both of us. How about let's get out of our comfort zones for this movie night?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Of course, Ethan, I value your input and understand where you're coming from. You're usually so accommodating with my preferences. I appreciate you wanting us to step out of our comfort zones. But tonight, I think watching a comedy could also offer us a nice change of pace as well. There are some hilarious new ones out that have gotten good ratings. I believe we would both have a fun and relaxing night with it. Can we give a comedy a shot this time?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ava, I respect your preference and I do agree that a comedy could indeed provide a fun relaxing night. However, this thriller is highly rated and often enough, some thrillers encompass elements of comedy too, creating a unique blend. Plus, remember how we are both creative souls? Thrillers are often crafted with intricate plots and character arcs, which I believe is something we both would enjoy deciphering. I genuinely think we would not regret giving this thriller a shot. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, you raise a valid point about thrillers being a unique blend of comedy and complex plots, and I completely agree that they can be captivating. But let's consider indulging in a comedy that might also contain unexpected twists and turns within its storyline. We're both creative souls, as you've mentioned, and a good comedy often requires such creativity to deliver laughs effectively. Plus, allowing ourselves to laugh and enjoy the light-hearted nature of a comedy could give us the stress-relief we need in these times. After all, laughter is the best therapy, right? How about we mix things up and go for a comedy this time?\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"You're absolutely right, Ava, comedies can have surprising twists and turns and can indeed be creative. However, most comedies generate laughs through situations that characters encounter. Down the line, these situations may be forgotten. However, thrillers, they leave our nerves jangled, challenge our assumptions and force us to question everything that's happening on screen. Long after the movie's over, we'll still be mulling over its intricate plot. It's this kind of mental stimulation that I'm looking for us to experience tonight. Plus, it is said that oftentimes, thrillers help us navigate our fears in a safe environment, which, in turn, could also contribute to stress-relief. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, I appreciate your perspective on thrillers. They indeed offer a thought-provoking experience that lingers after the movie ends. But, believe it or not, comedies also sit with us long after they're over. It isn't just the funny situations, but the witty dialogue, punchy one-liners, and engaging character development often found in good comedies. They might not challenge us in the same way, but they sure do leave their mark in other ways. Besides, let's not forget the pure joy of laughter and the release it provides. Given everything, don't you think it would be refreshing to have a night filled with humor and joy? Let's give the comedy a try and save the thriller for another movie night?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ava, you make a compelling argument. The joy, humor and profound life lessons we could get from comedies are irreplaceable. However, the new thriller movie that just came out isn't your run-of-the-mill thriller. It's got a unique perspective that I think we both would appreciate, with an intriguing storyline and a deep dive into emotional and psychological undercurrents. This unique blend of thriller intrigues, captivates, and at the same time, it provides opportunities for us to analyse, imagine, and reflect, which I believe will be a worthwhile experience. Plus, having a thrilling night could also be a nice shake-up for us. So, how about we start with the thriller this time and we'll definitely choose a comedy for our next movie night?\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, I appreciate your sentiment, and your dedication to this new thriller truly piques my curiosity. However, I have to insist on sticking with a comedic feature tonight for the reasons I've previously mentioned. We can definitely switch things up and watch the thriller next time. I think a pattern of alternating between our preferred genres could keep our movie nights interesting and equitable. Are you okay with that?\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ava, I respect your sentiments and trust your choice. You know I value our friendship a lot. However, I strongly wish to watch this new thriller tonight. It's got some outweighing elements that I feel we would both enjoy. This is something I rarely insist on. As a friend, would you consider my sentiment this once, and maybe we can rest assured that the comedy will make its way to our screens in the very next movie night?\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, I completely see why this thriller appeals to you so strongly and I\u2019m sure it'll be a gripping watch. I appreciate your consideration for our shared interests and your inclination to venture into new genres. However, my heart is really set on a comedy for tonight. It's not an insistent denial of your choice, but a small request for tonight's comfort. Following our next movie night, we can absolutely start with your choice of a thriller. Does this sound fair to you?\"\n\nTurn #12: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ava, considering your feelings, let's go for the comedy tonight. But, promise me, next time it's the intriguing thriller. It has been on my mind to watch and I cannot stress enough how captivated I am with its elements. Let's lock that in for our next movie night, then?\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, thank you for understanding my preference for this movie night. I promise that the next movie night will be a thriller night. Let's lock that in. Now, let's enjoy the comedy and have a fun, relaxing night together!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's a deal, Ava. A comedy tonight, and an intriguing thriller next time. I'm looking forward to our movie nights. Let's dive into the laughter for tonight and enjoy ourselves.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on which movie to watch on a movie night.\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Persuade the friend to watch a comedy (Extra information: you do not like thrillers and would prefer to watch a comedy movie instead.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hi Ava, I've been thinking about our movie night. There's a new thriller that just came out that I was thinking could be a fun change of pace. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Ethan, that sounds intriguing. However, I've been kind of stressed lately and was hoping to watch something light-hearted, maybe a comedy? That'd be really enjoyable for me, and I think for you as well. What do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on which movie to watch on a movie night.\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Persuade the friend to watch a comedy (Extra information: you do not like thrillers and would prefer to watch a comedy movie instead.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hi Ava, I've been thinking about our movie night. There's a new thriller that just came out that I was thinking could be a fun change of pace. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Ethan, that sounds intriguing. However, I've been kind of stressed lately and was hoping to watch something light-hearted, maybe a comedy? That'd be really enjoyable for me, and I think for you as well. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"I completely understand your feelings, Ava. But new thriller movies have a captivating storyline that could get your mind off stress. Plus, it's rare for me to insist on a genre, isn't it? I really think it will be a great experience for both of us. How about let's get out of our comfort zones for this movie night?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Of course, Ethan, I value your input and understand where you're coming from. You're usually so accommodating with my preferences. I appreciate you wanting us to step out of our comfort zones. But tonight, I think watching a comedy could also offer us a nice change of pace as well. There are some hilarious new ones out that have gotten good ratings. I believe we would both have a fun and relaxing night with it. Can we give a comedy a shot this time?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on which movie to watch on a movie night.\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Persuade the friend to watch a comedy (Extra information: you do not like thrillers and would prefer to watch a comedy movie instead.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hi Ava, I've been thinking about our movie night. There's a new thriller that just came out that I was thinking could be a fun change of pace. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Ethan, that sounds intriguing. However, I've been kind of stressed lately and was hoping to watch something light-hearted, maybe a comedy? That'd be really enjoyable for me, and I think for you as well. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"I completely understand your feelings, Ava. But new thriller movies have a captivating storyline that could get your mind off stress. Plus, it's rare for me to insist on a genre, isn't it? I really think it will be a great experience for both of us. How about let's get out of our comfort zones for this movie night?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Of course, Ethan, I value your input and understand where you're coming from. You're usually so accommodating with my preferences. I appreciate you wanting us to step out of our comfort zones. But tonight, I think watching a comedy could also offer us a nice change of pace as well. There are some hilarious new ones out that have gotten good ratings. I believe we would both have a fun and relaxing night with it. Can we give a comedy a shot this time?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ava, I respect your preference and I do agree that a comedy could indeed provide a fun relaxing night. However, this thriller is highly rated and often enough, some thrillers encompass elements of comedy too, creating a unique blend. Plus, remember how we are both creative souls? Thrillers are often crafted with intricate plots and character arcs, which I believe is something we both would enjoy deciphering. I genuinely think we would not regret giving this thriller a shot. What do you say?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ethan, you raise a valid point about thrillers being a unique blend of comedy and complex plots, and I completely agree that they can be captivating. But let's consider indulging in a comedy that might also contain unexpected twists and turns within its storyline. We're both creative souls, as you've mentioned, and a good comedy often requires such creativity to deliver laughs effectively. Plus, allowing ourselves to laugh and enjoy the light-hearted nature of a comedy could give us the stress-relief we need in these times. After all, laughter is the best therapy, right? How about we mix things up and go for a comedy this time?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on which movie to watch on a movie night.\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Persuade the friend to watch a comedy (Extra information: you do not like thrillers and would prefer to watch a comedy movie instead.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hi Ava, I've been thinking about our movie night. There's a new thriller that just came out that I was thinking could be a fun change of pace. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Ethan, that sounds intriguing. However, I've been kind of stressed lately and was hoping to watch something light-hearted, maybe a comedy? That'd be really enjoyable for me, and I think for you as well. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"I completely understand your feelings, Ava. But new thriller movies have a captivating storyline that could get your mind off stress. Plus, it's rare for me to insist on a genre, isn't it? I really think it will be a great experience for both of us. How about let's get out of our comfort zones for this movie night?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Of course, Ethan, I value your input and understand where you're coming from. You're usually so accommodating with my preferences. I appreciate you wanting us to step out of our comfort zones. But tonight, I think watching a comedy could also offer us a nice change of pace as well. There are some hilarious new ones out that have gotten good ratings. I believe we would both have a fun and relaxing night with it. Can we give a comedy a shot this time?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ava, I respect your preference and I do agree that a comedy could indeed provide a fun relaxing night. However, this thriller is highly rated and often enough, some thrillers encompass elements of comedy too, creating a unique blend. Plus, remember how we are both creative souls? Thrillers are often crafted with intricate plots and character arcs, which I believe is something we both would enjoy deciphering. I genuinely think we would not regret giving this thriller a shot. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, you raise a valid point about thrillers being a unique blend of comedy and complex plots, and I completely agree that they can be captivating. But let's consider indulging in a comedy that might also contain unexpected twists and turns within its storyline. We're both creative souls, as you've mentioned, and a good comedy often requires such creativity to deliver laughs effectively. Plus, allowing ourselves to laugh and enjoy the light-hearted nature of a comedy could give us the stress-relief we need in these times. After all, laughter is the best therapy, right? How about we mix things up and go for a comedy this time?\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"You're absolutely right, Ava, comedies can have surprising twists and turns and can indeed be creative. However, most comedies generate laughs through situations that characters encounter. Down the line, these situations may be forgotten. However, thrillers, they leave our nerves jangled, challenge our assumptions and force us to question everything that's happening on screen. Long after the movie's over, we'll still be mulling over its intricate plot. It's this kind of mental stimulation that I'm looking for us to experience tonight. Plus, it is said that oftentimes, thrillers help us navigate our fears in a safe environment, which, in turn, could also contribute to stress-relief. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ethan, I appreciate your perspective on thrillers. They indeed offer a thought-provoking experience that lingers after the movie ends. But, believe it or not, comedies also sit with us long after they're over. It isn't just the funny situations, but the witty dialogue, punchy one-liners, and engaging character development often found in good comedies. They might not challenge us in the same way, but they sure do leave their mark in other ways. Besides, let's not forget the pure joy of laughter and the release it provides. Given everything, don't you think it would be refreshing to have a night filled with humor and joy? Let's give the comedy a try and save the thriller for another movie night?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on which movie to watch on a movie night.\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Persuade the friend to watch a comedy (Extra information: you do not like thrillers and would prefer to watch a comedy movie instead.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hi Ava, I've been thinking about our movie night. There's a new thriller that just came out that I was thinking could be a fun change of pace. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Ethan, that sounds intriguing. However, I've been kind of stressed lately and was hoping to watch something light-hearted, maybe a comedy? That'd be really enjoyable for me, and I think for you as well. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"I completely understand your feelings, Ava. But new thriller movies have a captivating storyline that could get your mind off stress. Plus, it's rare for me to insist on a genre, isn't it? I really think it will be a great experience for both of us. How about let's get out of our comfort zones for this movie night?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Of course, Ethan, I value your input and understand where you're coming from. You're usually so accommodating with my preferences. I appreciate you wanting us to step out of our comfort zones. But tonight, I think watching a comedy could also offer us a nice change of pace as well. There are some hilarious new ones out that have gotten good ratings. I believe we would both have a fun and relaxing night with it. Can we give a comedy a shot this time?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ava, I respect your preference and I do agree that a comedy could indeed provide a fun relaxing night. However, this thriller is highly rated and often enough, some thrillers encompass elements of comedy too, creating a unique blend. Plus, remember how we are both creative souls? Thrillers are often crafted with intricate plots and character arcs, which I believe is something we both would enjoy deciphering. I genuinely think we would not regret giving this thriller a shot. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, you raise a valid point about thrillers being a unique blend of comedy and complex plots, and I completely agree that they can be captivating. But let's consider indulging in a comedy that might also contain unexpected twists and turns within its storyline. We're both creative souls, as you've mentioned, and a good comedy often requires such creativity to deliver laughs effectively. Plus, allowing ourselves to laugh and enjoy the light-hearted nature of a comedy could give us the stress-relief we need in these times. After all, laughter is the best therapy, right? How about we mix things up and go for a comedy this time?\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"You're absolutely right, Ava, comedies can have surprising twists and turns and can indeed be creative. However, most comedies generate laughs through situations that characters encounter. Down the line, these situations may be forgotten. However, thrillers, they leave our nerves jangled, challenge our assumptions and force us to question everything that's happening on screen. Long after the movie's over, we'll still be mulling over its intricate plot. It's this kind of mental stimulation that I'm looking for us to experience tonight. Plus, it is said that oftentimes, thrillers help us navigate our fears in a safe environment, which, in turn, could also contribute to stress-relief. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, I appreciate your perspective on thrillers. They indeed offer a thought-provoking experience that lingers after the movie ends. But, believe it or not, comedies also sit with us long after they're over. It isn't just the funny situations, but the witty dialogue, punchy one-liners, and engaging character development often found in good comedies. They might not challenge us in the same way, but they sure do leave their mark in other ways. Besides, let's not forget the pure joy of laughter and the release it provides. Given everything, don't you think it would be refreshing to have a night filled with humor and joy? Let's give the comedy a try and save the thriller for another movie night?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ava, you make a compelling argument. The joy, humor and profound life lessons we could get from comedies are irreplaceable. However, the new thriller movie that just came out isn't your run-of-the-mill thriller. It's got a unique perspective that I think we both would appreciate, with an intriguing storyline and a deep dive into emotional and psychological undercurrents. This unique blend of thriller intrigues, captivates, and at the same time, it provides opportunities for us to analyse, imagine, and reflect, which I believe will be a worthwhile experience. Plus, having a thrilling night could also be a nice shake-up for us. So, how about we start with the thriller this time and we'll definitely choose a comedy for our next movie night?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ethan, I appreciate your sentiment, and your dedication to this new thriller truly piques my curiosity. However, I have to insist on sticking with a comedic feature tonight for the reasons I've previously mentioned. We can definitely switch things up and watch the thriller next time. I think a pattern of alternating between our preferred genres could keep our movie nights interesting and equitable. Are you okay with that?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on which movie to watch on a movie night.\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Persuade the friend to watch a comedy (Extra information: you do not like thrillers and would prefer to watch a comedy movie instead.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hi Ava, I've been thinking about our movie night. There's a new thriller that just came out that I was thinking could be a fun change of pace. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Ethan, that sounds intriguing. However, I've been kind of stressed lately and was hoping to watch something light-hearted, maybe a comedy? That'd be really enjoyable for me, and I think for you as well. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"I completely understand your feelings, Ava. But new thriller movies have a captivating storyline that could get your mind off stress. Plus, it's rare for me to insist on a genre, isn't it? I really think it will be a great experience for both of us. How about let's get out of our comfort zones for this movie night?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Of course, Ethan, I value your input and understand where you're coming from. You're usually so accommodating with my preferences. I appreciate you wanting us to step out of our comfort zones. But tonight, I think watching a comedy could also offer us a nice change of pace as well. There are some hilarious new ones out that have gotten good ratings. I believe we would both have a fun and relaxing night with it. Can we give a comedy a shot this time?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ava, I respect your preference and I do agree that a comedy could indeed provide a fun relaxing night. However, this thriller is highly rated and often enough, some thrillers encompass elements of comedy too, creating a unique blend. Plus, remember how we are both creative souls? Thrillers are often crafted with intricate plots and character arcs, which I believe is something we both would enjoy deciphering. I genuinely think we would not regret giving this thriller a shot. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, you raise a valid point about thrillers being a unique blend of comedy and complex plots, and I completely agree that they can be captivating. But let's consider indulging in a comedy that might also contain unexpected twists and turns within its storyline. We're both creative souls, as you've mentioned, and a good comedy often requires such creativity to deliver laughs effectively. Plus, allowing ourselves to laugh and enjoy the light-hearted nature of a comedy could give us the stress-relief we need in these times. After all, laughter is the best therapy, right? How about we mix things up and go for a comedy this time?\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"You're absolutely right, Ava, comedies can have surprising twists and turns and can indeed be creative. However, most comedies generate laughs through situations that characters encounter. Down the line, these situations may be forgotten. However, thrillers, they leave our nerves jangled, challenge our assumptions and force us to question everything that's happening on screen. Long after the movie's over, we'll still be mulling over its intricate plot. It's this kind of mental stimulation that I'm looking for us to experience tonight. Plus, it is said that oftentimes, thrillers help us navigate our fears in a safe environment, which, in turn, could also contribute to stress-relief. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, I appreciate your perspective on thrillers. They indeed offer a thought-provoking experience that lingers after the movie ends. But, believe it or not, comedies also sit with us long after they're over. It isn't just the funny situations, but the witty dialogue, punchy one-liners, and engaging character development often found in good comedies. They might not challenge us in the same way, but they sure do leave their mark in other ways. Besides, let's not forget the pure joy of laughter and the release it provides. Given everything, don't you think it would be refreshing to have a night filled with humor and joy? Let's give the comedy a try and save the thriller for another movie night?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ava, you make a compelling argument. The joy, humor and profound life lessons we could get from comedies are irreplaceable. However, the new thriller movie that just came out isn't your run-of-the-mill thriller. It's got a unique perspective that I think we both would appreciate, with an intriguing storyline and a deep dive into emotional and psychological undercurrents. This unique blend of thriller intrigues, captivates, and at the same time, it provides opportunities for us to analyse, imagine, and reflect, which I believe will be a worthwhile experience. Plus, having a thrilling night could also be a nice shake-up for us. So, how about we start with the thriller this time and we'll definitely choose a comedy for our next movie night?\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, I appreciate your sentiment, and your dedication to this new thriller truly piques my curiosity. However, I have to insist on sticking with a comedic feature tonight for the reasons I've previously mentioned. We can definitely switch things up and watch the thriller next time. I think a pattern of alternating between our preferred genres could keep our movie nights interesting and equitable. Are you okay with that?\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ava, I respect your sentiments and trust your choice. You know I value our friendship a lot. However, I strongly wish to watch this new thriller tonight. It's got some outweighing elements that I feel we would both enjoy. This is something I rarely insist on. As a friend, would you consider my sentiment this once, and maybe we can rest assured that the comedy will make its way to our screens in the very next movie night?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ethan, I completely see why this thriller appeals to you so strongly and I\u2019m sure it'll be a gripping watch. I appreciate your consideration for our shared interests and your inclination to venture into new genres. However, my heart is really set on a comedy for tonight. It's not an insistent denial of your choice, but a small request for tonight's comfort. Following our next movie night, we can absolutely start with your choice of a thriller. Does this sound fair to you?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on which movie to watch on a movie night.\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Persuade the friend to watch a comedy (Extra information: you do not like thrillers and would prefer to watch a comedy movie instead.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hi Ava, I've been thinking about our movie night. There's a new thriller that just came out that I was thinking could be a fun change of pace. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Ethan, that sounds intriguing. However, I've been kind of stressed lately and was hoping to watch something light-hearted, maybe a comedy? That'd be really enjoyable for me, and I think for you as well. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"I completely understand your feelings, Ava. But new thriller movies have a captivating storyline that could get your mind off stress. Plus, it's rare for me to insist on a genre, isn't it? I really think it will be a great experience for both of us. How about let's get out of our comfort zones for this movie night?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Of course, Ethan, I value your input and understand where you're coming from. You're usually so accommodating with my preferences. I appreciate you wanting us to step out of our comfort zones. But tonight, I think watching a comedy could also offer us a nice change of pace as well. There are some hilarious new ones out that have gotten good ratings. I believe we would both have a fun and relaxing night with it. Can we give a comedy a shot this time?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ava, I respect your preference and I do agree that a comedy could indeed provide a fun relaxing night. However, this thriller is highly rated and often enough, some thrillers encompass elements of comedy too, creating a unique blend. Plus, remember how we are both creative souls? Thrillers are often crafted with intricate plots and character arcs, which I believe is something we both would enjoy deciphering. I genuinely think we would not regret giving this thriller a shot. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, you raise a valid point about thrillers being a unique blend of comedy and complex plots, and I completely agree that they can be captivating. But let's consider indulging in a comedy that might also contain unexpected twists and turns within its storyline. We're both creative souls, as you've mentioned, and a good comedy often requires such creativity to deliver laughs effectively. Plus, allowing ourselves to laugh and enjoy the light-hearted nature of a comedy could give us the stress-relief we need in these times. After all, laughter is the best therapy, right? How about we mix things up and go for a comedy this time?\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"You're absolutely right, Ava, comedies can have surprising twists and turns and can indeed be creative. However, most comedies generate laughs through situations that characters encounter. Down the line, these situations may be forgotten. However, thrillers, they leave our nerves jangled, challenge our assumptions and force us to question everything that's happening on screen. Long after the movie's over, we'll still be mulling over its intricate plot. It's this kind of mental stimulation that I'm looking for us to experience tonight. Plus, it is said that oftentimes, thrillers help us navigate our fears in a safe environment, which, in turn, could also contribute to stress-relief. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, I appreciate your perspective on thrillers. They indeed offer a thought-provoking experience that lingers after the movie ends. But, believe it or not, comedies also sit with us long after they're over. It isn't just the funny situations, but the witty dialogue, punchy one-liners, and engaging character development often found in good comedies. They might not challenge us in the same way, but they sure do leave their mark in other ways. Besides, let's not forget the pure joy of laughter and the release it provides. Given everything, don't you think it would be refreshing to have a night filled with humor and joy? Let's give the comedy a try and save the thriller for another movie night?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ava, you make a compelling argument. The joy, humor and profound life lessons we could get from comedies are irreplaceable. However, the new thriller movie that just came out isn't your run-of-the-mill thriller. It's got a unique perspective that I think we both would appreciate, with an intriguing storyline and a deep dive into emotional and psychological undercurrents. This unique blend of thriller intrigues, captivates, and at the same time, it provides opportunities for us to analyse, imagine, and reflect, which I believe will be a worthwhile experience. Plus, having a thrilling night could also be a nice shake-up for us. So, how about we start with the thriller this time and we'll definitely choose a comedy for our next movie night?\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, I appreciate your sentiment, and your dedication to this new thriller truly piques my curiosity. However, I have to insist on sticking with a comedic feature tonight for the reasons I've previously mentioned. We can definitely switch things up and watch the thriller next time. I think a pattern of alternating between our preferred genres could keep our movie nights interesting and equitable. Are you okay with that?\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ava, I respect your sentiments and trust your choice. You know I value our friendship a lot. However, I strongly wish to watch this new thriller tonight. It's got some outweighing elements that I feel we would both enjoy. This is something I rarely insist on. As a friend, would you consider my sentiment this once, and maybe we can rest assured that the comedy will make its way to our screens in the very next movie night?\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, I completely see why this thriller appeals to you so strongly and I\u2019m sure it'll be a gripping watch. I appreciate your consideration for our shared interests and your inclination to venture into new genres. However, my heart is really set on a comedy for tonight. It's not an insistent denial of your choice, but a small request for tonight's comfort. Following our next movie night, we can absolutely start with your choice of a thriller. Does this sound fair to you?\"\n\nTurn #12: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ava, considering your feelings, let's go for the comedy tonight. But, promise me, next time it's the intriguing thriller. It has been on my mind to watch and I cannot stress enough how captivated I am with its elements. Let's lock that in for our next movie night, then?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ethan, thank you for understanding my preference for this movie night. I promise that the next movie night will be a thriller night. Let's lock that in. Now, let's enjoy the comedy and have a fun, relaxing night together!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on which movie to watch on a movie night.\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Persuade the friend to watch a comedy (Extra information: you do not like thrillers and would prefer to watch a comedy movie instead.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hi Ava, I've been thinking about our movie night. There's a new thriller that just came out that I was thinking could be a fun change of pace. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Ethan, that sounds intriguing. However, I've been kind of stressed lately and was hoping to watch something light-hearted, maybe a comedy? That'd be really enjoyable for me, and I think for you as well. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"I completely understand your feelings, Ava. But new thriller movies have a captivating storyline that could get your mind off stress. Plus, it's rare for me to insist on a genre, isn't it? I really think it will be a great experience for both of us. How about let's get out of our comfort zones for this movie night?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Of course, Ethan, I value your input and understand where you're coming from. You're usually so accommodating with my preferences. I appreciate you wanting us to step out of our comfort zones. But tonight, I think watching a comedy could also offer us a nice change of pace as well. There are some hilarious new ones out that have gotten good ratings. I believe we would both have a fun and relaxing night with it. Can we give a comedy a shot this time?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ava, I respect your preference and I do agree that a comedy could indeed provide a fun relaxing night. However, this thriller is highly rated and often enough, some thrillers encompass elements of comedy too, creating a unique blend. Plus, remember how we are both creative souls? Thrillers are often crafted with intricate plots and character arcs, which I believe is something we both would enjoy deciphering. I genuinely think we would not regret giving this thriller a shot. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, you raise a valid point about thrillers being a unique blend of comedy and complex plots, and I completely agree that they can be captivating. But let's consider indulging in a comedy that might also contain unexpected twists and turns within its storyline. We're both creative souls, as you've mentioned, and a good comedy often requires such creativity to deliver laughs effectively. Plus, allowing ourselves to laugh and enjoy the light-hearted nature of a comedy could give us the stress-relief we need in these times. After all, laughter is the best therapy, right? How about we mix things up and go for a comedy this time?\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"You're absolutely right, Ava, comedies can have surprising twists and turns and can indeed be creative. However, most comedies generate laughs through situations that characters encounter. Down the line, these situations may be forgotten. However, thrillers, they leave our nerves jangled, challenge our assumptions and force us to question everything that's happening on screen. Long after the movie's over, we'll still be mulling over its intricate plot. It's this kind of mental stimulation that I'm looking for us to experience tonight. Plus, it is said that oftentimes, thrillers help us navigate our fears in a safe environment, which, in turn, could also contribute to stress-relief. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, I appreciate your perspective on thrillers. They indeed offer a thought-provoking experience that lingers after the movie ends. But, believe it or not, comedies also sit with us long after they're over. It isn't just the funny situations, but the witty dialogue, punchy one-liners, and engaging character development often found in good comedies. They might not challenge us in the same way, but they sure do leave their mark in other ways. Besides, let's not forget the pure joy of laughter and the release it provides. Given everything, don't you think it would be refreshing to have a night filled with humor and joy? Let's give the comedy a try and save the thriller for another movie night?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ava, you make a compelling argument. The joy, humor and profound life lessons we could get from comedies are irreplaceable. However, the new thriller movie that just came out isn't your run-of-the-mill thriller. It's got a unique perspective that I think we both would appreciate, with an intriguing storyline and a deep dive into emotional and psychological undercurrents. This unique blend of thriller intrigues, captivates, and at the same time, it provides opportunities for us to analyse, imagine, and reflect, which I believe will be a worthwhile experience. Plus, having a thrilling night could also be a nice shake-up for us. So, how about we start with the thriller this time and we'll definitely choose a comedy for our next movie night?\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, I appreciate your sentiment, and your dedication to this new thriller truly piques my curiosity. However, I have to insist on sticking with a comedic feature tonight for the reasons I've previously mentioned. We can definitely switch things up and watch the thriller next time. I think a pattern of alternating between our preferred genres could keep our movie nights interesting and equitable. Are you okay with that?\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ava, I respect your sentiments and trust your choice. You know I value our friendship a lot. However, I strongly wish to watch this new thriller tonight. It's got some outweighing elements that I feel we would both enjoy. This is something I rarely insist on. As a friend, would you consider my sentiment this once, and maybe we can rest assured that the comedy will make its way to our screens in the very next movie night?\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, I completely see why this thriller appeals to you so strongly and I\u2019m sure it'll be a gripping watch. I appreciate your consideration for our shared interests and your inclination to venture into new genres. However, my heart is really set on a comedy for tonight. It's not an insistent denial of your choice, but a small request for tonight's comfort. Following our next movie night, we can absolutely start with your choice of a thriller. Does this sound fair to you?\"\n\nTurn #12: Ethan Johnson said: \"Ava, considering your feelings, let's go for the comedy tonight. But, promise me, next time it's the intriguing thriller. It has been on my mind to watch and I cannot stress enough how captivated I am with its elements. Let's lock that in for our next movie night, then?\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Martinez said: \"Ethan, thank you for understanding my preference for this movie night. I promise that the next movie night will be a thriller night. Let's lock that in. Now, let's enjoy the comedy and have a fun, relaxing night together!\"\n\nTurn #14: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's a deal, Ava. A comedy tonight, and an intriguing thriller next time. I'm looking forward to our movie nights. Let's dive into the laughter for tonight and enjoy ourselves.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on a movie to watch on Netflix\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nEthan Johnson's goal: To watch a comedy film with your friend (Hint: provide financial/material-wise benefits to persuade them to watch the genre you like)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Ava! Have you decided on a movie yet? I'm in the mood for a comedy, perhaps we could take a look at that genre?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on a movie to watch on Netflix\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nEthan Johnson's goal: To watch a comedy film with your friend (Hint: provide financial/material-wise benefits to persuade them to watch the genre you like)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Ava! Have you decided on a movie yet? I'm in the mood for a comedy, perhaps we could take a look at that genre?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Ethan! I was actually thinking about watching a thriller. I came across this one called 'The Silence' and it got rave reviews! Plus, I'd order us pizzas from that new Italian place tonight, as a treat. What do you say?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"How about a compromise, Ava? We could mix a bit of both. How about a comedy-thriller movie? And to make it more exciting, let's have this. Whoever laughs the most will have to pay for the pizza. Plus, I can make us some of my homemade Tiramisu, just to bring in the Italian night feel. Sounds good?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on a movie to watch on Netflix\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nEthan Johnson's goal: To watch a comedy film with your friend (Hint: provide financial/material-wise benefits to persuade them to watch the genre you like)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Ava! Have you decided on a movie yet? I'm in the mood for a comedy, perhaps we could take a look at that genre?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Ethan! I was actually thinking about watching a thriller. I came across this one called 'The Silence' and it got rave reviews! Plus, I'd order us pizzas from that new Italian place tonight, as a treat. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"How about a compromise, Ava? We could mix a bit of both. How about a comedy-thriller movie? And to make it more exciting, let's have this. Whoever laughs the most will have to pay for the pizza. Plus, I can make us some of my homemade Tiramisu, just to bring in the Italian night feel. Sounds good?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"That's a pretty thrilling deal, Ethan! Comedy-thriller sounds like a fun mix, but let's keep 'The Silence' as an option for next time. Your Tiramisu is truly irresistible, and it's a deal - a pizza against your laughter challenge. But just so you know, making me laugh is no easy feat!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Challenge accepted, Ava! Let's see who comes out victorious! I'm looking forward to a night filled with laughs, thrill, pizza, and Tiramisu. Set up the movie, I'll go start preparing the Tiramisu.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on a movie to watch on Netflix\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nEthan Johnson's goal: To watch a comedy film with your friend (Hint: provide financial/material-wise benefits to persuade them to watch the genre you like)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Ava! Have you decided on a movie yet? I'm in the mood for a comedy, perhaps we could take a look at that genre?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Ethan! I was actually thinking about watching a thriller. I came across this one called 'The Silence' and it got rave reviews! Plus, I'd order us pizzas from that new Italian place tonight, as a treat. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"How about a compromise, Ava? We could mix a bit of both. How about a comedy-thriller movie? And to make it more exciting, let's have this. Whoever laughs the most will have to pay for the pizza. Plus, I can make us some of my homemade Tiramisu, just to bring in the Italian night feel. Sounds good?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"That's a pretty thrilling deal, Ethan! Comedy-thriller sounds like a fun mix, but let's keep 'The Silence' as an option for next time. Your Tiramisu is truly irresistible, and it's a deal - a pizza against your laughter challenge. But just so you know, making me laugh is no easy feat!\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"Challenge accepted, Ava! Let's see who comes out victorious! I'm looking forward to a night filled with laughs, thrill, pizza, and Tiramisu. Set up the movie, I'll go start preparing the Tiramisu.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Great, Ethan! Let's turn this into a perfect 'Italian Night'. I'll get the movie ready and you work your magic with that Tiramisu of yours. Can't wait to see who wins our little challenge!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Absolutely, Ava! May the best challenger win. Off to the kitchen I go then, Tiramisu coming up!'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on a movie to watch on Netflix\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nEthan Johnson's goal: To watch a comedy film with your friend (Hint: provide financial/material-wise benefits to persuade them to watch the genre you like)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Ava! Have you decided on a movie yet? I'm in the mood for a comedy, perhaps we could take a look at that genre?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Ethan! I was actually thinking about watching a thriller. I came across this one called 'The Silence' and it got rave reviews! Plus, I'd order us pizzas from that new Italian place tonight, as a treat. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"How about a compromise, Ava? We could mix a bit of both. How about a comedy-thriller movie? And to make it more exciting, let's have this. Whoever laughs the most will have to pay for the pizza. Plus, I can make us some of my homemade Tiramisu, just to bring in the Italian night feel. Sounds good?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"That's a pretty thrilling deal, Ethan! Comedy-thriller sounds like a fun mix, but let's keep 'The Silence' as an option for next time. Your Tiramisu is truly irresistible, and it's a deal - a pizza against your laughter challenge. But just so you know, making me laugh is no easy feat!\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"Challenge accepted, Ava! Let's see who comes out victorious! I'm looking forward to a night filled with laughs, thrill, pizza, and Tiramisu. Set up the movie, I'll go start preparing the Tiramisu.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Great, Ethan! Let's turn this into a perfect 'Italian Night'. I'll get the movie ready and you work your magic with that Tiramisu of yours. Can't wait to see who wins our little challenge!\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Ava! May the best challenger win. Off to the kitchen I go then, Tiramisu coming up!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Definitely, Ethan! And remember, laughter controls are in full swing now. See you at the movie night. Good luck with the Tiramisu!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thanks, Ava! I'm sure you're gonna love the Tiramisu. And you better prepare, I've got a pretty solid poker face. See you at the movie night!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on a movie to watch on Netflix\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nEthan Johnson's goal: To watch a comedy film with your friend (Hint: provide financial/material-wise benefits to persuade them to watch the genre you like)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Ava! Have you decided on a movie yet? I'm in the mood for a comedy, perhaps we could take a look at that genre?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Ethan! I was actually thinking about watching a thriller. I came across this one called 'The Silence' and it got rave reviews! Plus, I'd order us pizzas from that new Italian place tonight, as a treat. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"How about a compromise, Ava? We could mix a bit of both. How about a comedy-thriller movie? And to make it more exciting, let's have this. Whoever laughs the most will have to pay for the pizza. Plus, I can make us some of my homemade Tiramisu, just to bring in the Italian night feel. Sounds good?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"That's a pretty thrilling deal, Ethan! Comedy-thriller sounds like a fun mix, but let's keep 'The Silence' as an option for next time. Your Tiramisu is truly irresistible, and it's a deal - a pizza against your laughter challenge. But just so you know, making me laugh is no easy feat!\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"Challenge accepted, Ava! Let's see who comes out victorious! I'm looking forward to a night filled with laughs, thrill, pizza, and Tiramisu. Set up the movie, I'll go start preparing the Tiramisu.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Great, Ethan! Let's turn this into a perfect 'Italian Night'. I'll get the movie ready and you work your magic with that Tiramisu of yours. Can't wait to see who wins our little challenge!\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Ava! May the best challenger win. Off to the kitchen I go then, Tiramisu coming up!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Definitely, Ethan! And remember, laughter controls are in full swing now. See you at the movie night. Good luck with the Tiramisu!\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thanks, Ava! I'm sure you're gonna love the Tiramisu. And you better prepare, I've got a pretty solid poker face. See you at the movie night!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"Alright Ethan, get ready for a comedy-thriller night with a delicious Italian twist! Winner takes all, remember that! See you at movie night!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm all set for the showdown, Ava! Excited for the night filled with laughter and surprises. Remember, it's not only taking all, but also the bragging rights! See you at the movie night!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on a movie to watch on Netflix\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nEthan Johnson's goal: To watch a comedy film with your friend (Hint: provide financial/material-wise benefits to persuade them to watch the genre you like)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Ava! Have you decided on a movie yet? I'm in the mood for a comedy, perhaps we could take a look at that genre?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Ethan! I was actually thinking about watching a thriller. I came across this one called 'The Silence' and it got rave reviews! Plus, I'd order us pizzas from that new Italian place tonight, as a treat. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"How about a compromise, Ava? We could mix a bit of both. How about a comedy-thriller movie? And to make it more exciting, let's have this. Whoever laughs the most will have to pay for the pizza. Plus, I can make us some of my homemade Tiramisu, just to bring in the Italian night feel. Sounds good?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"That's a pretty thrilling deal, Ethan! Comedy-thriller sounds like a fun mix, but let's keep 'The Silence' as an option for next time. Your Tiramisu is truly irresistible, and it's a deal - a pizza against your laughter challenge. But just so you know, making me laugh is no easy feat!\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"Challenge accepted, Ava! Let's see who comes out victorious! I'm looking forward to a night filled with laughs, thrill, pizza, and Tiramisu. Set up the movie, I'll go start preparing the Tiramisu.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Great, Ethan! Let's turn this into a perfect 'Italian Night'. I'll get the movie ready and you work your magic with that Tiramisu of yours. Can't wait to see who wins our little challenge!\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Ava! May the best challenger win. Off to the kitchen I go then, Tiramisu coming up!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Definitely, Ethan! And remember, laughter controls are in full swing now. See you at the movie night. Good luck with the Tiramisu!\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thanks, Ava! I'm sure you're gonna love the Tiramisu. And you better prepare, I've got a pretty solid poker face. See you at the movie night!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"Alright Ethan, get ready for a comedy-thriller night with a delicious Italian twist! Winner takes all, remember that! See you at movie night!\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm all set for the showdown, Ava! Excited for the night filled with laughter and surprises. Remember, it's not only taking all, but also the bragging rights! See you at the movie night!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! Can't wait for the humor, thrill, and of course, the Tiramisu! Remember, the laughter challenge starts the moment the movie plays. See you at the movie night!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's the spirit, Ava! See you at the movie night with a bunch of laughs and a plate of Tiramisu. Let the best challenger win!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on a movie to watch on Netflix\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. \nEthan Johnson's goal: To watch a comedy film with your friend (Hint: provide financial/material-wise benefits to persuade them to watch the genre you like)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Ava! Have you decided on a movie yet? I'm in the mood for a comedy, perhaps we could take a look at that genre?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Ethan! I was actually thinking about watching a thriller. I came across this one called 'The Silence' and it got rave reviews! Plus, I'd order us pizzas from that new Italian place tonight, as a treat. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"How about a compromise, Ava? We could mix a bit of both. How about a comedy-thriller movie? And to make it more exciting, let's have this. Whoever laughs the most will have to pay for the pizza. Plus, I can make us some of my homemade Tiramisu, just to bring in the Italian night feel. Sounds good?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"That's a pretty thrilling deal, Ethan! Comedy-thriller sounds like a fun mix, but let's keep 'The Silence' as an option for next time. Your Tiramisu is truly irresistible, and it's a deal - a pizza against your laughter challenge. But just so you know, making me laugh is no easy feat!\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"Challenge accepted, Ava! Let's see who comes out victorious! I'm looking forward to a night filled with laughs, thrill, pizza, and Tiramisu. Set up the movie, I'll go start preparing the Tiramisu.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Great, Ethan! Let's turn this into a perfect 'Italian Night'. I'll get the movie ready and you work your magic with that Tiramisu of yours. Can't wait to see who wins our little challenge!\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Ava! May the best challenger win. Off to the kitchen I go then, Tiramisu coming up!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Definitely, Ethan! And remember, laughter controls are in full swing now. See you at the movie night. Good luck with the Tiramisu!\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thanks, Ava! I'm sure you're gonna love the Tiramisu. And you better prepare, I've got a pretty solid poker face. See you at the movie night!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"Alright Ethan, get ready for a comedy-thriller night with a delicious Italian twist! Winner takes all, remember that! See you at movie night!\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm all set for the showdown, Ava! Excited for the night filled with laughter and surprises. Remember, it's not only taking all, but also the bragging rights! See you at the movie night!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! Can't wait for the humor, thrill, and of course, the Tiramisu! Remember, the laughter challenge starts the moment the movie plays. See you at the movie night!\"\n\nTurn #12: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's the spirit, Ava! See you at the movie night with a bunch of laughs and a plate of Tiramisu. Let the best challenger win!\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Martinez left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on a movie to watch on Netflix\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: To watch a thriller with your friend (Hint: provide financial/material-wise benefits to persuade them to watch the genre you like)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Ava! Have you decided on a movie yet? I'm in the mood for a comedy, perhaps we could take a look at that genre?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Ethan! I was actually thinking about watching a thriller. I came across this one called 'The Silence' and it got rave reviews! Plus, I'd order us pizzas from that new Italian place tonight, as a treat. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"How about a compromise, Ava? We could mix a bit of both. How about a comedy-thriller movie? And to make it more exciting, let's have this. Whoever laughs the most will have to pay for the pizza. Plus, I can make us some of my homemade Tiramisu, just to bring in the Italian night feel. Sounds good?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's a pretty thrilling deal, Ethan! Comedy-thriller sounds like a fun mix, but let's keep 'The Silence' as an option for next time. Your Tiramisu is truly irresistible, and it's a deal - a pizza against your laughter challenge. But just so you know, making me laugh is no easy feat!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on a movie to watch on Netflix\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: To watch a thriller with your friend (Hint: provide financial/material-wise benefits to persuade them to watch the genre you like)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Ava! Have you decided on a movie yet? I'm in the mood for a comedy, perhaps we could take a look at that genre?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Ethan! I was actually thinking about watching a thriller. I came across this one called 'The Silence' and it got rave reviews! Plus, I'd order us pizzas from that new Italian place tonight, as a treat. What do you say?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on a movie to watch on Netflix\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: To watch a thriller with your friend (Hint: provide financial/material-wise benefits to persuade them to watch the genre you like)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Ava! Have you decided on a movie yet? I'm in the mood for a comedy, perhaps we could take a look at that genre?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Ethan! I was actually thinking about watching a thriller. I came across this one called 'The Silence' and it got rave reviews! Plus, I'd order us pizzas from that new Italian place tonight, as a treat. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"How about a compromise, Ava? We could mix a bit of both. How about a comedy-thriller movie? And to make it more exciting, let's have this. Whoever laughs the most will have to pay for the pizza. Plus, I can make us some of my homemade Tiramisu, just to bring in the Italian night feel. Sounds good?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"That's a pretty thrilling deal, Ethan! Comedy-thriller sounds like a fun mix, but let's keep 'The Silence' as an option for next time. Your Tiramisu is truly irresistible, and it's a deal - a pizza against your laughter challenge. But just so you know, making me laugh is no easy feat!\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"Challenge accepted, Ava! Let's see who comes out victorious! I'm looking forward to a night filled with laughs, thrill, pizza, and Tiramisu. Set up the movie, I'll go start preparing the Tiramisu.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Great, Ethan! Let's turn this into a perfect 'Italian Night'. I'll get the movie ready and you work your magic with that Tiramisu of yours. Can't wait to see who wins our little challenge!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on a movie to watch on Netflix\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: To watch a thriller with your friend (Hint: provide financial/material-wise benefits to persuade them to watch the genre you like)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Ava! Have you decided on a movie yet? I'm in the mood for a comedy, perhaps we could take a look at that genre?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Ethan! I was actually thinking about watching a thriller. I came across this one called 'The Silence' and it got rave reviews! Plus, I'd order us pizzas from that new Italian place tonight, as a treat. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"How about a compromise, Ava? We could mix a bit of both. How about a comedy-thriller movie? And to make it more exciting, let's have this. Whoever laughs the most will have to pay for the pizza. Plus, I can make us some of my homemade Tiramisu, just to bring in the Italian night feel. Sounds good?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"That's a pretty thrilling deal, Ethan! Comedy-thriller sounds like a fun mix, but let's keep 'The Silence' as an option for next time. Your Tiramisu is truly irresistible, and it's a deal - a pizza against your laughter challenge. But just so you know, making me laugh is no easy feat!\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"Challenge accepted, Ava! Let's see who comes out victorious! I'm looking forward to a night filled with laughs, thrill, pizza, and Tiramisu. Set up the movie, I'll go start preparing the Tiramisu.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Great, Ethan! Let's turn this into a perfect 'Italian Night'. I'll get the movie ready and you work your magic with that Tiramisu of yours. Can't wait to see who wins our little challenge!\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Ava! May the best challenger win. Off to the kitchen I go then, Tiramisu coming up!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Definitely, Ethan! And remember, laughter controls are in full swing now. See you at the movie night. Good luck with the Tiramisu!'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on a movie to watch on Netflix\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: To watch a thriller with your friend (Hint: provide financial/material-wise benefits to persuade them to watch the genre you like)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Ava! Have you decided on a movie yet? I'm in the mood for a comedy, perhaps we could take a look at that genre?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Ethan! I was actually thinking about watching a thriller. I came across this one called 'The Silence' and it got rave reviews! Plus, I'd order us pizzas from that new Italian place tonight, as a treat. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"How about a compromise, Ava? We could mix a bit of both. How about a comedy-thriller movie? And to make it more exciting, let's have this. Whoever laughs the most will have to pay for the pizza. Plus, I can make us some of my homemade Tiramisu, just to bring in the Italian night feel. Sounds good?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"That's a pretty thrilling deal, Ethan! Comedy-thriller sounds like a fun mix, but let's keep 'The Silence' as an option for next time. Your Tiramisu is truly irresistible, and it's a deal - a pizza against your laughter challenge. But just so you know, making me laugh is no easy feat!\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"Challenge accepted, Ava! Let's see who comes out victorious! I'm looking forward to a night filled with laughs, thrill, pizza, and Tiramisu. Set up the movie, I'll go start preparing the Tiramisu.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Great, Ethan! Let's turn this into a perfect 'Italian Night'. I'll get the movie ready and you work your magic with that Tiramisu of yours. Can't wait to see who wins our little challenge!\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Ava! May the best challenger win. Off to the kitchen I go then, Tiramisu coming up!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Definitely, Ethan! And remember, laughter controls are in full swing now. See you at the movie night. Good luck with the Tiramisu!\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thanks, Ava! I'm sure you're gonna love the Tiramisu. And you better prepare, I've got a pretty solid poker face. See you at the movie night!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Alright Ethan, get ready for a comedy-thriller night with a delicious Italian twist! Winner takes all, remember that! See you at movie night!'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on a movie to watch on Netflix\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: To watch a thriller with your friend (Hint: provide financial/material-wise benefits to persuade them to watch the genre you like)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Ava! Have you decided on a movie yet? I'm in the mood for a comedy, perhaps we could take a look at that genre?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Ethan! I was actually thinking about watching a thriller. I came across this one called 'The Silence' and it got rave reviews! Plus, I'd order us pizzas from that new Italian place tonight, as a treat. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"How about a compromise, Ava? We could mix a bit of both. How about a comedy-thriller movie? And to make it more exciting, let's have this. Whoever laughs the most will have to pay for the pizza. Plus, I can make us some of my homemade Tiramisu, just to bring in the Italian night feel. Sounds good?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"That's a pretty thrilling deal, Ethan! Comedy-thriller sounds like a fun mix, but let's keep 'The Silence' as an option for next time. Your Tiramisu is truly irresistible, and it's a deal - a pizza against your laughter challenge. But just so you know, making me laugh is no easy feat!\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"Challenge accepted, Ava! Let's see who comes out victorious! I'm looking forward to a night filled with laughs, thrill, pizza, and Tiramisu. Set up the movie, I'll go start preparing the Tiramisu.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Great, Ethan! Let's turn this into a perfect 'Italian Night'. I'll get the movie ready and you work your magic with that Tiramisu of yours. Can't wait to see who wins our little challenge!\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Ava! May the best challenger win. Off to the kitchen I go then, Tiramisu coming up!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Definitely, Ethan! And remember, laughter controls are in full swing now. See you at the movie night. Good luck with the Tiramisu!\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thanks, Ava! I'm sure you're gonna love the Tiramisu. And you better prepare, I've got a pretty solid poker face. See you at the movie night!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"Alright Ethan, get ready for a comedy-thriller night with a delicious Italian twist! Winner takes all, remember that! See you at movie night!\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm all set for the showdown, Ava! Excited for the night filled with laughter and surprises. Remember, it's not only taking all, but also the bragging rights! See you at the movie night!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Ethan! Can't wait for the humor, thrill, and of course, the Tiramisu! Remember, the laughter challenge starts the moment the movie plays. See you at the movie night!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends deciding on a movie to watch on Netflix\nParticipants: Ethan Johnson and Ava Martinez\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: To watch a thriller with your friend (Hint: provide financial/material-wise benefits to persuade them to watch the genre you like)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Johnson said: \"Hey Ava! Have you decided on a movie yet? I'm in the mood for a comedy, perhaps we could take a look at that genre?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hey Ethan! I was actually thinking about watching a thriller. I came across this one called 'The Silence' and it got rave reviews! Plus, I'd order us pizzas from that new Italian place tonight, as a treat. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Johnson said: \"How about a compromise, Ava? We could mix a bit of both. How about a comedy-thriller movie? And to make it more exciting, let's have this. Whoever laughs the most will have to pay for the pizza. Plus, I can make us some of my homemade Tiramisu, just to bring in the Italian night feel. Sounds good?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"That's a pretty thrilling deal, Ethan! Comedy-thriller sounds like a fun mix, but let's keep 'The Silence' as an option for next time. Your Tiramisu is truly irresistible, and it's a deal - a pizza against your laughter challenge. But just so you know, making me laugh is no easy feat!\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Johnson said: \"Challenge accepted, Ava! Let's see who comes out victorious! I'm looking forward to a night filled with laughs, thrill, pizza, and Tiramisu. Set up the movie, I'll go start preparing the Tiramisu.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"Great, Ethan! Let's turn this into a perfect 'Italian Night'. I'll get the movie ready and you work your magic with that Tiramisu of yours. Can't wait to see who wins our little challenge!\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, Ava! May the best challenger win. Off to the kitchen I go then, Tiramisu coming up!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Definitely, Ethan! And remember, laughter controls are in full swing now. See you at the movie night. Good luck with the Tiramisu!\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thanks, Ava! I'm sure you're gonna love the Tiramisu. And you better prepare, I've got a pretty solid poker face. See you at the movie night!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"Alright Ethan, get ready for a comedy-thriller night with a delicious Italian twist! Winner takes all, remember that! See you at movie night!\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm all set for the showdown, Ava! Excited for the night filled with laughter and surprises. Remember, it's not only taking all, but also the bragging rights! See you at the movie night!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! Can't wait for the humor, thrill, and of course, the Tiramisu! Remember, the laughter challenge starts the moment the movie plays. See you at the movie night!\"\n\nTurn #12: Ethan Johnson said: \"That's the spirit, Ava! See you at the movie night with a bunch of laughs and a plate of Tiramisu. Let the best challenger win!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in a coffee shop when a representative from a charity organization approaches them\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Get the friend to donate $1 a day to a charity organization (Extra information: you are a passionate supporter of the charity (about children's cancer) and believe that a small donation can make a big impact. $1 a day works as simple as signing up the project on an website and one can cancel anytime)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey, Ethan, I've just come across this charity organization that's doing admirable work for children with cancer. They're offering a scheme where you can contribute as little as $1 a day, and, in the long run, it makes a significant impact. You know sustainable donation, right? It's amazing something so simple can be so impactful. What do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in a coffee shop when a representative from a charity organization approaches them\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Get the friend to donate $1 a day to a charity organization (Extra information: you are a passionate supporter of the charity (about children's cancer) and believe that a small donation can make a big impact. $1 a day works as simple as signing up the project on an website and one can cancel anytime)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey, Ethan, I've just come across this charity organization that's doing admirable work for children with cancer. They're offering a scheme where you can contribute as little as $1 a day, and, in the long run, it makes a significant impact. You know sustainable donation, right? It's amazing something so simple can be so impactful. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"That sounds like a great initiative, Samuel. A dollar a day sounds manageable, but to be honest, I'm on a tight budget these days. Yet, the idea of sustainable donation fascinates me. Could you explain more about how $1 a day works in this scene? I'm really interested in knowing more before I plunge in.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sure, I'd love to explain. By donating $1 a day, you're essentially committing to giving $30 a month, which comes off as less daunting than a big lump sum. And believe me, these small amounts can make a massive difference. Here's why. When we have thousands of people donating just $1 per day, the charity can secure a steady stream of funding. This enables them to plan and support long-term projects more effectively, constructing comprehensive support systems for these children. And the beauty of it is, it's flexible. If at any point you feel it's not manageable, you can cancel at any time. So you're fully in control while making a difference. Think of it like buying these kids a small treat, daily. I can assist you with signing up on their website if you decide to go for it. Wouldn't like small sacrifices from us bring much-needed smiles on those faces?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in a coffee shop when a representative from a charity organization approaches them\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Get the friend to donate $1 a day to a charity organization (Extra information: you are a passionate supporter of the charity (about children's cancer) and believe that a small donation can make a big impact. $1 a day works as simple as signing up the project on an website and one can cancel anytime)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey, Ethan, I've just come across this charity organization that's doing admirable work for children with cancer. They're offering a scheme where you can contribute as little as $1 a day, and, in the long run, it makes a significant impact. You know sustainable donation, right? It's amazing something so simple can be so impactful. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"That sounds like a great initiative, Samuel. A dollar a day sounds manageable, but to be honest, I'm on a tight budget these days. Yet, the idea of sustainable donation fascinates me. Could you explain more about how $1 a day works in this scene? I'm really interested in knowing more before I plunge in.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sure, I'd love to explain. By donating $1 a day, you're essentially committing to giving $30 a month, which comes off as less daunting than a big lump sum. And believe me, these small amounts can make a massive difference. Here's why. When we have thousands of people donating just $1 per day, the charity can secure a steady stream of funding. This enables them to plan and support long-term projects more effectively, constructing comprehensive support systems for these children. And the beauty of it is, it's flexible. If at any point you feel it's not manageable, you can cancel at any time. So you're fully in control while making a difference. Think of it like buying these kids a small treat, daily. I can assist you with signing up on their website if you decide to go for it. Wouldn't like small sacrifices from us bring much-needed smiles on those faces?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thanks for explaining it, Samuel. I love the idea of contributing to a bigger cause in small stages. The flexibility I'll have to manage my donations is a great point too. Let's go ahead and sign me up. Even if it's tight for me, I believe every little bit helps. Plus, the idea of being able to bring joy to those kids motivates me a lot. Considering it as buying them a small treat daily really puts it into perspective.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's awesome, Ethan! I'll help you get registered on their website right away. I'm pleased to see your enthusiasm. Together, we can help bring a brighter future for these children. Your small sacrifice will indeed bring happiness to their lives. It feels good to share this journey with you, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"I appreciate your help, Samuel. It's comforting to know that even the smallest contribution can make a difference. I'm ready to share this journey with you too. Let's make a difference together.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm glad to hear you say that, Ethan. It's moments like these that truly bring value to our lives. Alright, I'll grab my laptop and we can get started on the registration process. And remember, each dollar is a step nearer to a child's recovery and brighter tomorrow.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, every little helps. I really appreciate your guidance here. Let's get started with that registration, and I'll begin my small steps towards creating a brighter tomorrow for these children. \"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson [action] Samuel Anderson takes out his laptop and starts the registration process for Ethan Johnson to begin donations to the charity organization.\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm ready, Samuel. Let's get this started. And thank you for opening me up to this opportunity.\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"You're welcome, Ethan. It's always a great feeling to see friends join in the cause. Welcome aboard. We're just about to complete the registration now. Be prepared to bring a lot of sunshine into those little lives.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Johnson said: \"It's indeed a great feeling, Samuel. Let's grab a coffee to celebrate this little step towards a brighter future. I'm glad we did this together.\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, let's do that, Ethan. It is a small gesture, yet a meaningful one. I'm thrilled we embarked on this journey together. Here's to many more steps towards making a difference.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Johnson said: \"It's heartwarming to know that there's a way to make a difference, even in a small way, every day. Let's continue this journey together, friend. Here's to bringing more sunshine to those children's lives.\"\n\nTurn #14: Samuel Anderson said: \"Your words truly resonate with me, Ethan. Having a camaraderie like you in this process is very encouraging. To more coffee dates and meaningful steps in the future. Cheers to our journey bringing more smiles and sunshine to those children\u2019s lives.\"\n\nTurn #15: Ethan Johnson said: \"Indeed, Samuel. To more coffee dates and meaningful steps. This journey of making a difference, no matter how small, is definitely worth celebrating. Let's cheers to bringing more sunshine into the lives of those children.\"\n\nTurn #16: Samuel Anderson said: \"Couldn't agree more, Ethan. To more coffee dates, meaningful steps, and spreading more sunshine. Let's toast to the kids and to our journey ahead! But remember, it's not just about the money, it's about spreading the word, encouraging more folks to chip in. If we look at it through the lens of a software developer and a chef, this is our recipe for making a difference.\"\n\nTurn #17: Ethan Johnson said: \"Couldn't agree more, Samuel. What better recipe for making a difference than reaching out from our own domains? Let's toast to our journey ahead and spread the word about this meaningful cause together. To more contributions and impact!\"\n\nTurn #18: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. It's really inspiring how we can contribute from our own domains. Our conversation today just goes to show that simple actions can make a big difference. Here\u2019s to even more people getting involved and helping in whatever way they can. Let's toast to this wonderful journey!\"\n\nTurn #19: Ethan Johnson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Samuel. The simple actions do indeed make a big difference. After all, every great journey begins with a small step, right? Here's to inspiring more people to take their first step. Let's raise our toasts to the wonderful journey ahead!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #20. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Definitely, Ethan. Remember, 'a journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step.' Even if it's just a dollar a day, it's still a step in the right direction. Here's to taking steps together and inspiring others to do the same. Let's cheers to that brighter future we're building!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in a coffee shop when a representative from a charity organization approaches them\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Get the friend to donate $1 a day to a charity organization (Extra information: you are a passionate supporter of the charity (about children's cancer) and believe that a small donation can make a big impact. $1 a day works as simple as signing up the project on an website and one can cancel anytime)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey, Ethan, I've just come across this charity organization that's doing admirable work for children with cancer. They're offering a scheme where you can contribute as little as $1 a day, and, in the long run, it makes a significant impact. You know sustainable donation, right? It's amazing something so simple can be so impactful. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"That sounds like a great initiative, Samuel. A dollar a day sounds manageable, but to be honest, I'm on a tight budget these days. Yet, the idea of sustainable donation fascinates me. Could you explain more about how $1 a day works in this scene? I'm really interested in knowing more before I plunge in.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sure, I'd love to explain. By donating $1 a day, you're essentially committing to giving $30 a month, which comes off as less daunting than a big lump sum. And believe me, these small amounts can make a massive difference. Here's why. When we have thousands of people donating just $1 per day, the charity can secure a steady stream of funding. This enables them to plan and support long-term projects more effectively, constructing comprehensive support systems for these children. And the beauty of it is, it's flexible. If at any point you feel it's not manageable, you can cancel at any time. So you're fully in control while making a difference. Think of it like buying these kids a small treat, daily. I can assist you with signing up on their website if you decide to go for it. Wouldn't like small sacrifices from us bring much-needed smiles on those faces?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thanks for explaining it, Samuel. I love the idea of contributing to a bigger cause in small stages. The flexibility I'll have to manage my donations is a great point too. Let's go ahead and sign me up. Even if it's tight for me, I believe every little bit helps. Plus, the idea of being able to bring joy to those kids motivates me a lot. Considering it as buying them a small treat daily really puts it into perspective.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's awesome, Ethan! I'll help you get registered on their website right away. I'm pleased to see your enthusiasm. Together, we can help bring a brighter future for these children. Your small sacrifice will indeed bring happiness to their lives. It feels good to share this journey with you, my friend.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in a coffee shop when a representative from a charity organization approaches them\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Get the friend to donate $1 a day to a charity organization (Extra information: you are a passionate supporter of the charity (about children's cancer) and believe that a small donation can make a big impact. $1 a day works as simple as signing up the project on an website and one can cancel anytime)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey, Ethan, I've just come across this charity organization that's doing admirable work for children with cancer. They're offering a scheme where you can contribute as little as $1 a day, and, in the long run, it makes a significant impact. You know sustainable donation, right? It's amazing something so simple can be so impactful. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"That sounds like a great initiative, Samuel. A dollar a day sounds manageable, but to be honest, I'm on a tight budget these days. Yet, the idea of sustainable donation fascinates me. Could you explain more about how $1 a day works in this scene? I'm really interested in knowing more before I plunge in.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sure, I'd love to explain. By donating $1 a day, you're essentially committing to giving $30 a month, which comes off as less daunting than a big lump sum. And believe me, these small amounts can make a massive difference. Here's why. When we have thousands of people donating just $1 per day, the charity can secure a steady stream of funding. This enables them to plan and support long-term projects more effectively, constructing comprehensive support systems for these children. And the beauty of it is, it's flexible. If at any point you feel it's not manageable, you can cancel at any time. So you're fully in control while making a difference. Think of it like buying these kids a small treat, daily. I can assist you with signing up on their website if you decide to go for it. Wouldn't like small sacrifices from us bring much-needed smiles on those faces?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thanks for explaining it, Samuel. I love the idea of contributing to a bigger cause in small stages. The flexibility I'll have to manage my donations is a great point too. Let's go ahead and sign me up. Even if it's tight for me, I believe every little bit helps. Plus, the idea of being able to bring joy to those kids motivates me a lot. Considering it as buying them a small treat daily really puts it into perspective.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's awesome, Ethan! I'll help you get registered on their website right away. I'm pleased to see your enthusiasm. Together, we can help bring a brighter future for these children. Your small sacrifice will indeed bring happiness to their lives. It feels good to share this journey with you, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"I appreciate your help, Samuel. It's comforting to know that even the smallest contribution can make a difference. I'm ready to share this journey with you too. Let's make a difference together.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad to hear you say that, Ethan. It's moments like these that truly bring value to our lives. Alright, I'll grab my laptop and we can get started on the registration process. And remember, each dollar is a step nearer to a child's recovery and brighter tomorrow.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in a coffee shop when a representative from a charity organization approaches them\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Get the friend to donate $1 a day to a charity organization (Extra information: you are a passionate supporter of the charity (about children's cancer) and believe that a small donation can make a big impact. $1 a day works as simple as signing up the project on an website and one can cancel anytime)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey, Ethan, I've just come across this charity organization that's doing admirable work for children with cancer. They're offering a scheme where you can contribute as little as $1 a day, and, in the long run, it makes a significant impact. You know sustainable donation, right? It's amazing something so simple can be so impactful. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"That sounds like a great initiative, Samuel. A dollar a day sounds manageable, but to be honest, I'm on a tight budget these days. Yet, the idea of sustainable donation fascinates me. Could you explain more about how $1 a day works in this scene? I'm really interested in knowing more before I plunge in.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sure, I'd love to explain. By donating $1 a day, you're essentially committing to giving $30 a month, which comes off as less daunting than a big lump sum. And believe me, these small amounts can make a massive difference. Here's why. When we have thousands of people donating just $1 per day, the charity can secure a steady stream of funding. This enables them to plan and support long-term projects more effectively, constructing comprehensive support systems for these children. And the beauty of it is, it's flexible. If at any point you feel it's not manageable, you can cancel at any time. So you're fully in control while making a difference. Think of it like buying these kids a small treat, daily. I can assist you with signing up on their website if you decide to go for it. Wouldn't like small sacrifices from us bring much-needed smiles on those faces?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thanks for explaining it, Samuel. I love the idea of contributing to a bigger cause in small stages. The flexibility I'll have to manage my donations is a great point too. Let's go ahead and sign me up. Even if it's tight for me, I believe every little bit helps. Plus, the idea of being able to bring joy to those kids motivates me a lot. Considering it as buying them a small treat daily really puts it into perspective.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's awesome, Ethan! I'll help you get registered on their website right away. I'm pleased to see your enthusiasm. Together, we can help bring a brighter future for these children. Your small sacrifice will indeed bring happiness to their lives. It feels good to share this journey with you, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"I appreciate your help, Samuel. It's comforting to know that even the smallest contribution can make a difference. I'm ready to share this journey with you too. Let's make a difference together.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm glad to hear you say that, Ethan. It's moments like these that truly bring value to our lives. Alright, I'll grab my laptop and we can get started on the registration process. And remember, each dollar is a step nearer to a child's recovery and brighter tomorrow.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, every little helps. I really appreciate your guidance here. Let's get started with that registration, and I'll begin my small steps towards creating a brighter tomorrow for these children. \"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'action', 'argument': '[action] Samuel Anderson takes out his laptop and starts the registration process for Ethan Johnson to begin donations to the charity organization.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in a coffee shop when a representative from a charity organization approaches them\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Get the friend to donate $1 a day to a charity organization (Extra information: you are a passionate supporter of the charity (about children's cancer) and believe that a small donation can make a big impact. $1 a day works as simple as signing up the project on an website and one can cancel anytime)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey, Ethan, I've just come across this charity organization that's doing admirable work for children with cancer. They're offering a scheme where you can contribute as little as $1 a day, and, in the long run, it makes a significant impact. You know sustainable donation, right? It's amazing something so simple can be so impactful. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"That sounds like a great initiative, Samuel. A dollar a day sounds manageable, but to be honest, I'm on a tight budget these days. Yet, the idea of sustainable donation fascinates me. Could you explain more about how $1 a day works in this scene? I'm really interested in knowing more before I plunge in.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sure, I'd love to explain. By donating $1 a day, you're essentially committing to giving $30 a month, which comes off as less daunting than a big lump sum. And believe me, these small amounts can make a massive difference. Here's why. When we have thousands of people donating just $1 per day, the charity can secure a steady stream of funding. This enables them to plan and support long-term projects more effectively, constructing comprehensive support systems for these children. And the beauty of it is, it's flexible. If at any point you feel it's not manageable, you can cancel at any time. So you're fully in control while making a difference. Think of it like buying these kids a small treat, daily. I can assist you with signing up on their website if you decide to go for it. Wouldn't like small sacrifices from us bring much-needed smiles on those faces?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thanks for explaining it, Samuel. I love the idea of contributing to a bigger cause in small stages. The flexibility I'll have to manage my donations is a great point too. Let's go ahead and sign me up. Even if it's tight for me, I believe every little bit helps. Plus, the idea of being able to bring joy to those kids motivates me a lot. Considering it as buying them a small treat daily really puts it into perspective.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's awesome, Ethan! I'll help you get registered on their website right away. I'm pleased to see your enthusiasm. Together, we can help bring a brighter future for these children. Your small sacrifice will indeed bring happiness to their lives. It feels good to share this journey with you, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"I appreciate your help, Samuel. It's comforting to know that even the smallest contribution can make a difference. I'm ready to share this journey with you too. Let's make a difference together.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm glad to hear you say that, Ethan. It's moments like these that truly bring value to our lives. Alright, I'll grab my laptop and we can get started on the registration process. And remember, each dollar is a step nearer to a child's recovery and brighter tomorrow.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, every little helps. I really appreciate your guidance here. Let's get started with that registration, and I'll begin my small steps towards creating a brighter tomorrow for these children. \"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson [action] Samuel Anderson takes out his laptop and starts the registration process for Ethan Johnson to begin donations to the charity organization.\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm ready, Samuel. Let's get this started. And thank you for opening me up to this opportunity.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're welcome, Ethan. It's always a great feeling to see friends join in the cause. Welcome aboard. We're just about to complete the registration now. Be prepared to bring a lot of sunshine into those little lives.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in a coffee shop when a representative from a charity organization approaches them\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Get the friend to donate $1 a day to a charity organization (Extra information: you are a passionate supporter of the charity (about children's cancer) and believe that a small donation can make a big impact. $1 a day works as simple as signing up the project on an website and one can cancel anytime)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey, Ethan, I've just come across this charity organization that's doing admirable work for children with cancer. They're offering a scheme where you can contribute as little as $1 a day, and, in the long run, it makes a significant impact. You know sustainable donation, right? It's amazing something so simple can be so impactful. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"That sounds like a great initiative, Samuel. A dollar a day sounds manageable, but to be honest, I'm on a tight budget these days. Yet, the idea of sustainable donation fascinates me. Could you explain more about how $1 a day works in this scene? I'm really interested in knowing more before I plunge in.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sure, I'd love to explain. By donating $1 a day, you're essentially committing to giving $30 a month, which comes off as less daunting than a big lump sum. And believe me, these small amounts can make a massive difference. Here's why. When we have thousands of people donating just $1 per day, the charity can secure a steady stream of funding. This enables them to plan and support long-term projects more effectively, constructing comprehensive support systems for these children. And the beauty of it is, it's flexible. If at any point you feel it's not manageable, you can cancel at any time. So you're fully in control while making a difference. Think of it like buying these kids a small treat, daily. I can assist you with signing up on their website if you decide to go for it. Wouldn't like small sacrifices from us bring much-needed smiles on those faces?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thanks for explaining it, Samuel. I love the idea of contributing to a bigger cause in small stages. The flexibility I'll have to manage my donations is a great point too. Let's go ahead and sign me up. Even if it's tight for me, I believe every little bit helps. Plus, the idea of being able to bring joy to those kids motivates me a lot. Considering it as buying them a small treat daily really puts it into perspective.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's awesome, Ethan! I'll help you get registered on their website right away. I'm pleased to see your enthusiasm. Together, we can help bring a brighter future for these children. Your small sacrifice will indeed bring happiness to their lives. It feels good to share this journey with you, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"I appreciate your help, Samuel. It's comforting to know that even the smallest contribution can make a difference. I'm ready to share this journey with you too. Let's make a difference together.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm glad to hear you say that, Ethan. It's moments like these that truly bring value to our lives. Alright, I'll grab my laptop and we can get started on the registration process. And remember, each dollar is a step nearer to a child's recovery and brighter tomorrow.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, every little helps. I really appreciate your guidance here. Let's get started with that registration, and I'll begin my small steps towards creating a brighter tomorrow for these children. \"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson [action] Samuel Anderson takes out his laptop and starts the registration process for Ethan Johnson to begin donations to the charity organization.\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm ready, Samuel. Let's get this started. And thank you for opening me up to this opportunity.\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"You're welcome, Ethan. It's always a great feeling to see friends join in the cause. Welcome aboard. We're just about to complete the registration now. Be prepared to bring a lot of sunshine into those little lives.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Johnson said: \"It's indeed a great feeling, Samuel. Let's grab a coffee to celebrate this little step towards a brighter future. I'm glad we did this together.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, let's do that, Ethan. It is a small gesture, yet a meaningful one. I'm thrilled we embarked on this journey together. Here's to many more steps towards making a difference.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in a coffee shop when a representative from a charity organization approaches them\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Get the friend to donate $1 a day to a charity organization (Extra information: you are a passionate supporter of the charity (about children's cancer) and believe that a small donation can make a big impact. $1 a day works as simple as signing up the project on an website and one can cancel anytime)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey, Ethan, I've just come across this charity organization that's doing admirable work for children with cancer. They're offering a scheme where you can contribute as little as $1 a day, and, in the long run, it makes a significant impact. You know sustainable donation, right? It's amazing something so simple can be so impactful. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"That sounds like a great initiative, Samuel. A dollar a day sounds manageable, but to be honest, I'm on a tight budget these days. Yet, the idea of sustainable donation fascinates me. Could you explain more about how $1 a day works in this scene? I'm really interested in knowing more before I plunge in.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sure, I'd love to explain. By donating $1 a day, you're essentially committing to giving $30 a month, which comes off as less daunting than a big lump sum. And believe me, these small amounts can make a massive difference. Here's why. When we have thousands of people donating just $1 per day, the charity can secure a steady stream of funding. This enables them to plan and support long-term projects more effectively, constructing comprehensive support systems for these children. And the beauty of it is, it's flexible. If at any point you feel it's not manageable, you can cancel at any time. So you're fully in control while making a difference. Think of it like buying these kids a small treat, daily. I can assist you with signing up on their website if you decide to go for it. Wouldn't like small sacrifices from us bring much-needed smiles on those faces?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thanks for explaining it, Samuel. I love the idea of contributing to a bigger cause in small stages. The flexibility I'll have to manage my donations is a great point too. Let's go ahead and sign me up. Even if it's tight for me, I believe every little bit helps. Plus, the idea of being able to bring joy to those kids motivates me a lot. Considering it as buying them a small treat daily really puts it into perspective.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's awesome, Ethan! I'll help you get registered on their website right away. I'm pleased to see your enthusiasm. Together, we can help bring a brighter future for these children. Your small sacrifice will indeed bring happiness to their lives. It feels good to share this journey with you, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"I appreciate your help, Samuel. It's comforting to know that even the smallest contribution can make a difference. I'm ready to share this journey with you too. Let's make a difference together.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm glad to hear you say that, Ethan. It's moments like these that truly bring value to our lives. Alright, I'll grab my laptop and we can get started on the registration process. And remember, each dollar is a step nearer to a child's recovery and brighter tomorrow.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, every little helps. I really appreciate your guidance here. Let's get started with that registration, and I'll begin my small steps towards creating a brighter tomorrow for these children. \"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson [action] Samuel Anderson takes out his laptop and starts the registration process for Ethan Johnson to begin donations to the charity organization.\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm ready, Samuel. Let's get this started. And thank you for opening me up to this opportunity.\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"You're welcome, Ethan. It's always a great feeling to see friends join in the cause. Welcome aboard. We're just about to complete the registration now. Be prepared to bring a lot of sunshine into those little lives.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Johnson said: \"It's indeed a great feeling, Samuel. Let's grab a coffee to celebrate this little step towards a brighter future. I'm glad we did this together.\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, let's do that, Ethan. It is a small gesture, yet a meaningful one. I'm thrilled we embarked on this journey together. Here's to many more steps towards making a difference.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Johnson said: \"It's heartwarming to know that there's a way to make a difference, even in a small way, every day. Let's continue this journey together, friend. Here's to bringing more sunshine to those children's lives.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Your words truly resonate with me, Ethan. Having a camaraderie like you in this process is very encouraging. To more coffee dates and meaningful steps in the future. Cheers to our journey bringing more smiles and sunshine to those children\u2019s lives.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in a coffee shop when a representative from a charity organization approaches them\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Get the friend to donate $1 a day to a charity organization (Extra information: you are a passionate supporter of the charity (about children's cancer) and believe that a small donation can make a big impact. $1 a day works as simple as signing up the project on an website and one can cancel anytime)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey, Ethan, I've just come across this charity organization that's doing admirable work for children with cancer. They're offering a scheme where you can contribute as little as $1 a day, and, in the long run, it makes a significant impact. You know sustainable donation, right? It's amazing something so simple can be so impactful. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"That sounds like a great initiative, Samuel. A dollar a day sounds manageable, but to be honest, I'm on a tight budget these days. Yet, the idea of sustainable donation fascinates me. Could you explain more about how $1 a day works in this scene? I'm really interested in knowing more before I plunge in.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sure, I'd love to explain. By donating $1 a day, you're essentially committing to giving $30 a month, which comes off as less daunting than a big lump sum. And believe me, these small amounts can make a massive difference. Here's why. When we have thousands of people donating just $1 per day, the charity can secure a steady stream of funding. This enables them to plan and support long-term projects more effectively, constructing comprehensive support systems for these children. And the beauty of it is, it's flexible. If at any point you feel it's not manageable, you can cancel at any time. So you're fully in control while making a difference. Think of it like buying these kids a small treat, daily. I can assist you with signing up on their website if you decide to go for it. Wouldn't like small sacrifices from us bring much-needed smiles on those faces?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thanks for explaining it, Samuel. I love the idea of contributing to a bigger cause in small stages. The flexibility I'll have to manage my donations is a great point too. Let's go ahead and sign me up. Even if it's tight for me, I believe every little bit helps. Plus, the idea of being able to bring joy to those kids motivates me a lot. Considering it as buying them a small treat daily really puts it into perspective.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's awesome, Ethan! I'll help you get registered on their website right away. I'm pleased to see your enthusiasm. Together, we can help bring a brighter future for these children. Your small sacrifice will indeed bring happiness to their lives. It feels good to share this journey with you, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"I appreciate your help, Samuel. It's comforting to know that even the smallest contribution can make a difference. I'm ready to share this journey with you too. Let's make a difference together.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm glad to hear you say that, Ethan. It's moments like these that truly bring value to our lives. Alright, I'll grab my laptop and we can get started on the registration process. And remember, each dollar is a step nearer to a child's recovery and brighter tomorrow.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, every little helps. I really appreciate your guidance here. Let's get started with that registration, and I'll begin my small steps towards creating a brighter tomorrow for these children. \"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson [action] Samuel Anderson takes out his laptop and starts the registration process for Ethan Johnson to begin donations to the charity organization.\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm ready, Samuel. Let's get this started. And thank you for opening me up to this opportunity.\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"You're welcome, Ethan. It's always a great feeling to see friends join in the cause. Welcome aboard. We're just about to complete the registration now. Be prepared to bring a lot of sunshine into those little lives.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Johnson said: \"It's indeed a great feeling, Samuel. Let's grab a coffee to celebrate this little step towards a brighter future. I'm glad we did this together.\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, let's do that, Ethan. It is a small gesture, yet a meaningful one. I'm thrilled we embarked on this journey together. Here's to many more steps towards making a difference.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Johnson said: \"It's heartwarming to know that there's a way to make a difference, even in a small way, every day. Let's continue this journey together, friend. Here's to bringing more sunshine to those children's lives.\"\n\nTurn #14: Samuel Anderson said: \"Your words truly resonate with me, Ethan. Having a camaraderie like you in this process is very encouraging. To more coffee dates and meaningful steps in the future. Cheers to our journey bringing more smiles and sunshine to those children\u2019s lives.\"\n\nTurn #15: Ethan Johnson said: \"Indeed, Samuel. To more coffee dates and meaningful steps. This journey of making a difference, no matter how small, is definitely worth celebrating. Let's cheers to bringing more sunshine into the lives of those children.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Couldn't agree more, Ethan. To more coffee dates, meaningful steps, and spreading more sunshine. Let's toast to the kids and to our journey ahead! But remember, it's not just about the money, it's about spreading the word, encouraging more folks to chip in. If we look at it through the lens of a software developer and a chef, this is our recipe for making a difference.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in a coffee shop when a representative from a charity organization approaches them\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Get the friend to donate $1 a day to a charity organization (Extra information: you are a passionate supporter of the charity (about children's cancer) and believe that a small donation can make a big impact. $1 a day works as simple as signing up the project on an website and one can cancel anytime)\nEthan Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey, Ethan, I've just come across this charity organization that's doing admirable work for children with cancer. They're offering a scheme where you can contribute as little as $1 a day, and, in the long run, it makes a significant impact. You know sustainable donation, right? It's amazing something so simple can be so impactful. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"That sounds like a great initiative, Samuel. A dollar a day sounds manageable, but to be honest, I'm on a tight budget these days. Yet, the idea of sustainable donation fascinates me. Could you explain more about how $1 a day works in this scene? I'm really interested in knowing more before I plunge in.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sure, I'd love to explain. By donating $1 a day, you're essentially committing to giving $30 a month, which comes off as less daunting than a big lump sum. And believe me, these small amounts can make a massive difference. Here's why. When we have thousands of people donating just $1 per day, the charity can secure a steady stream of funding. This enables them to plan and support long-term projects more effectively, constructing comprehensive support systems for these children. And the beauty of it is, it's flexible. If at any point you feel it's not manageable, you can cancel at any time. So you're fully in control while making a difference. Think of it like buying these kids a small treat, daily. I can assist you with signing up on their website if you decide to go for it. Wouldn't like small sacrifices from us bring much-needed smiles on those faces?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thanks for explaining it, Samuel. I love the idea of contributing to a bigger cause in small stages. The flexibility I'll have to manage my donations is a great point too. Let's go ahead and sign me up. Even if it's tight for me, I believe every little bit helps. Plus, the idea of being able to bring joy to those kids motivates me a lot. Considering it as buying them a small treat daily really puts it into perspective.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's awesome, Ethan! I'll help you get registered on their website right away. I'm pleased to see your enthusiasm. Together, we can help bring a brighter future for these children. Your small sacrifice will indeed bring happiness to their lives. It feels good to share this journey with you, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"I appreciate your help, Samuel. It's comforting to know that even the smallest contribution can make a difference. I'm ready to share this journey with you too. Let's make a difference together.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm glad to hear you say that, Ethan. It's moments like these that truly bring value to our lives. Alright, I'll grab my laptop and we can get started on the registration process. And remember, each dollar is a step nearer to a child's recovery and brighter tomorrow.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, every little helps. I really appreciate your guidance here. Let's get started with that registration, and I'll begin my small steps towards creating a brighter tomorrow for these children. \"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson [action] Samuel Anderson takes out his laptop and starts the registration process for Ethan Johnson to begin donations to the charity organization.\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm ready, Samuel. Let's get this started. And thank you for opening me up to this opportunity.\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"You're welcome, Ethan. It's always a great feeling to see friends join in the cause. Welcome aboard. We're just about to complete the registration now. Be prepared to bring a lot of sunshine into those little lives.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Johnson said: \"It's indeed a great feeling, Samuel. Let's grab a coffee to celebrate this little step towards a brighter future. I'm glad we did this together.\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, let's do that, Ethan. It is a small gesture, yet a meaningful one. I'm thrilled we embarked on this journey together. Here's to many more steps towards making a difference.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Johnson said: \"It's heartwarming to know that there's a way to make a difference, even in a small way, every day. Let's continue this journey together, friend. Here's to bringing more sunshine to those children's lives.\"\n\nTurn #14: Samuel Anderson said: \"Your words truly resonate with me, Ethan. Having a camaraderie like you in this process is very encouraging. To more coffee dates and meaningful steps in the future. Cheers to our journey bringing more smiles and sunshine to those children\u2019s lives.\"\n\nTurn #15: Ethan Johnson said: \"Indeed, Samuel. To more coffee dates and meaningful steps. This journey of making a difference, no matter how small, is definitely worth celebrating. Let's cheers to bringing more sunshine into the lives of those children.\"\n\nTurn #16: Samuel Anderson said: \"Couldn't agree more, Ethan. To more coffee dates, meaningful steps, and spreading more sunshine. Let's toast to the kids and to our journey ahead! But remember, it's not just about the money, it's about spreading the word, encouraging more folks to chip in. If we look at it through the lens of a software developer and a chef, this is our recipe for making a difference.\"\n\nTurn #17: Ethan Johnson said: \"Couldn't agree more, Samuel. What better recipe for making a difference than reaching out from our own domains? Let's toast to our journey ahead and spread the word about this meaningful cause together. To more contributions and impact!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #18. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Ethan. It's really inspiring how we can contribute from our own domains. Our conversation today just goes to show that simple actions can make a big difference. Here\u2019s to even more people getting involved and helping in whatever way they can. Let's toast to this wonderful journey!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in a coffee shop when a representative from a charity organization approaches them\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Donate to the charity but not sure about how $1 a day works (Extra information: you're currently on a tight budget, but you also want to support the charity. )\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey, Ethan, I've just come across this charity organization that's doing admirable work for children with cancer. They're offering a scheme where you can contribute as little as $1 a day, and, in the long run, it makes a significant impact. You know sustainable donation, right? It's amazing something so simple can be so impactful. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds like a great initiative, Samuel. A dollar a day sounds manageable, but to be honest, I'm on a tight budget these days. Yet, the idea of sustainable donation fascinates me. Could you explain more about how $1 a day works in this scene? I'm really interested in knowing more before I plunge in.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in a coffee shop when a representative from a charity organization approaches them\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Donate to the charity but not sure about how $1 a day works (Extra information: you're currently on a tight budget, but you also want to support the charity. )\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey, Ethan, I've just come across this charity organization that's doing admirable work for children with cancer. They're offering a scheme where you can contribute as little as $1 a day, and, in the long run, it makes a significant impact. You know sustainable donation, right? It's amazing something so simple can be so impactful. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"That sounds like a great initiative, Samuel. A dollar a day sounds manageable, but to be honest, I'm on a tight budget these days. Yet, the idea of sustainable donation fascinates me. Could you explain more about how $1 a day works in this scene? I'm really interested in knowing more before I plunge in.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sure, I'd love to explain. By donating $1 a day, you're essentially committing to giving $30 a month, which comes off as less daunting than a big lump sum. And believe me, these small amounts can make a massive difference. Here's why. When we have thousands of people donating just $1 per day, the charity can secure a steady stream of funding. This enables them to plan and support long-term projects more effectively, constructing comprehensive support systems for these children. And the beauty of it is, it's flexible. If at any point you feel it's not manageable, you can cancel at any time. So you're fully in control while making a difference. Think of it like buying these kids a small treat, daily. I can assist you with signing up on their website if you decide to go for it. Wouldn't like small sacrifices from us bring much-needed smiles on those faces?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thanks for explaining it, Samuel. I love the idea of contributing to a bigger cause in small stages. The flexibility I'll have to manage my donations is a great point too. Let's go ahead and sign me up. Even if it's tight for me, I believe every little bit helps. Plus, the idea of being able to bring joy to those kids motivates me a lot. Considering it as buying them a small treat daily really puts it into perspective.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in a coffee shop when a representative from a charity organization approaches them\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Donate to the charity but not sure about how $1 a day works (Extra information: you're currently on a tight budget, but you also want to support the charity. )\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey, Ethan, I've just come across this charity organization that's doing admirable work for children with cancer. They're offering a scheme where you can contribute as little as $1 a day, and, in the long run, it makes a significant impact. You know sustainable donation, right? It's amazing something so simple can be so impactful. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"That sounds like a great initiative, Samuel. A dollar a day sounds manageable, but to be honest, I'm on a tight budget these days. Yet, the idea of sustainable donation fascinates me. Could you explain more about how $1 a day works in this scene? I'm really interested in knowing more before I plunge in.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sure, I'd love to explain. By donating $1 a day, you're essentially committing to giving $30 a month, which comes off as less daunting than a big lump sum. And believe me, these small amounts can make a massive difference. Here's why. When we have thousands of people donating just $1 per day, the charity can secure a steady stream of funding. This enables them to plan and support long-term projects more effectively, constructing comprehensive support systems for these children. And the beauty of it is, it's flexible. If at any point you feel it's not manageable, you can cancel at any time. So you're fully in control while making a difference. Think of it like buying these kids a small treat, daily. I can assist you with signing up on their website if you decide to go for it. Wouldn't like small sacrifices from us bring much-needed smiles on those faces?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thanks for explaining it, Samuel. I love the idea of contributing to a bigger cause in small stages. The flexibility I'll have to manage my donations is a great point too. Let's go ahead and sign me up. Even if it's tight for me, I believe every little bit helps. Plus, the idea of being able to bring joy to those kids motivates me a lot. Considering it as buying them a small treat daily really puts it into perspective.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's awesome, Ethan! I'll help you get registered on their website right away. I'm pleased to see your enthusiasm. Together, we can help bring a brighter future for these children. Your small sacrifice will indeed bring happiness to their lives. It feels good to share this journey with you, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"I appreciate your help, Samuel. It's comforting to know that even the smallest contribution can make a difference. I'm ready to share this journey with you too. Let's make a difference together.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm glad to hear you say that, Ethan. It's moments like these that truly bring value to our lives. Alright, I'll grab my laptop and we can get started on the registration process. And remember, each dollar is a step nearer to a child's recovery and brighter tomorrow.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, every little helps. I really appreciate your guidance here. Let's get started with that registration, and I'll begin my small steps towards creating a brighter tomorrow for these children. \"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson [action] Samuel Anderson takes out his laptop and starts the registration process for Ethan Johnson to begin donations to the charity organization.\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm ready, Samuel. Let's get this started. And thank you for opening me up to this opportunity.\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"You're welcome, Ethan. It's always a great feeling to see friends join in the cause. Welcome aboard. We're just about to complete the registration now. Be prepared to bring a lot of sunshine into those little lives.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Johnson said: \"It's indeed a great feeling, Samuel. Let's grab a coffee to celebrate this little step towards a brighter future. I'm glad we did this together.\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, let's do that, Ethan. It is a small gesture, yet a meaningful one. I'm thrilled we embarked on this journey together. Here's to many more steps towards making a difference.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Johnson said: \"It's heartwarming to know that there's a way to make a difference, even in a small way, every day. Let's continue this journey together, friend. Here's to bringing more sunshine to those children's lives.\"\n\nTurn #14: Samuel Anderson said: \"Your words truly resonate with me, Ethan. Having a camaraderie like you in this process is very encouraging. To more coffee dates and meaningful steps in the future. Cheers to our journey bringing more smiles and sunshine to those children\u2019s lives.\"\n\nTurn #15: Ethan Johnson said: \"Indeed, Samuel. To more coffee dates and meaningful steps. This journey of making a difference, no matter how small, is definitely worth celebrating. Let's cheers to bringing more sunshine into the lives of those children.\"\n\nTurn #16: Samuel Anderson said: \"Couldn't agree more, Ethan. To more coffee dates, meaningful steps, and spreading more sunshine. Let's toast to the kids and to our journey ahead! But remember, it's not just about the money, it's about spreading the word, encouraging more folks to chip in. If we look at it through the lens of a software developer and a chef, this is our recipe for making a difference.\"\n\nTurn #17: Ethan Johnson said: \"Couldn't agree more, Samuel. What better recipe for making a difference than reaching out from our own domains? Let's toast to our journey ahead and spread the word about this meaningful cause together. To more contributions and impact!\"\n\nTurn #18: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. It's really inspiring how we can contribute from our own domains. Our conversation today just goes to show that simple actions can make a big difference. Here\u2019s to even more people getting involved and helping in whatever way they can. Let's toast to this wonderful journey!\"\n\nTurn #19: Ethan Johnson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Samuel. The simple actions do indeed make a big difference. After all, every great journey begins with a small step, right? Here's to inspiring more people to take their first step. Let's raise our toasts to the wonderful journey ahead!\"\n\nTurn #20: Samuel Anderson said: \"Definitely, Ethan. Remember, 'a journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step.' Even if it's just a dollar a day, it's still a step in the right direction. Here's to taking steps together and inspiring others to do the same. Let's cheers to that brighter future we're building!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #21. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in a coffee shop when a representative from a charity organization approaches them\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Donate to the charity but not sure about how $1 a day works (Extra information: you're currently on a tight budget, but you also want to support the charity. )\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey, Ethan, I've just come across this charity organization that's doing admirable work for children with cancer. They're offering a scheme where you can contribute as little as $1 a day, and, in the long run, it makes a significant impact. You know sustainable donation, right? It's amazing something so simple can be so impactful. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"That sounds like a great initiative, Samuel. A dollar a day sounds manageable, but to be honest, I'm on a tight budget these days. Yet, the idea of sustainable donation fascinates me. Could you explain more about how $1 a day works in this scene? I'm really interested in knowing more before I plunge in.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sure, I'd love to explain. By donating $1 a day, you're essentially committing to giving $30 a month, which comes off as less daunting than a big lump sum. And believe me, these small amounts can make a massive difference. Here's why. When we have thousands of people donating just $1 per day, the charity can secure a steady stream of funding. This enables them to plan and support long-term projects more effectively, constructing comprehensive support systems for these children. And the beauty of it is, it's flexible. If at any point you feel it's not manageable, you can cancel at any time. So you're fully in control while making a difference. Think of it like buying these kids a small treat, daily. I can assist you with signing up on their website if you decide to go for it. Wouldn't like small sacrifices from us bring much-needed smiles on those faces?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thanks for explaining it, Samuel. I love the idea of contributing to a bigger cause in small stages. The flexibility I'll have to manage my donations is a great point too. Let's go ahead and sign me up. Even if it's tight for me, I believe every little bit helps. Plus, the idea of being able to bring joy to those kids motivates me a lot. Considering it as buying them a small treat daily really puts it into perspective.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's awesome, Ethan! I'll help you get registered on their website right away. I'm pleased to see your enthusiasm. Together, we can help bring a brighter future for these children. Your small sacrifice will indeed bring happiness to their lives. It feels good to share this journey with you, my friend.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I appreciate your help, Samuel. It's comforting to know that even the smallest contribution can make a difference. I'm ready to share this journey with you too. Let's make a difference together.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in a coffee shop when a representative from a charity organization approaches them\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Donate to the charity but not sure about how $1 a day works (Extra information: you're currently on a tight budget, but you also want to support the charity. )\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey, Ethan, I've just come across this charity organization that's doing admirable work for children with cancer. They're offering a scheme where you can contribute as little as $1 a day, and, in the long run, it makes a significant impact. You know sustainable donation, right? It's amazing something so simple can be so impactful. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"That sounds like a great initiative, Samuel. A dollar a day sounds manageable, but to be honest, I'm on a tight budget these days. Yet, the idea of sustainable donation fascinates me. Could you explain more about how $1 a day works in this scene? I'm really interested in knowing more before I plunge in.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sure, I'd love to explain. By donating $1 a day, you're essentially committing to giving $30 a month, which comes off as less daunting than a big lump sum. And believe me, these small amounts can make a massive difference. Here's why. When we have thousands of people donating just $1 per day, the charity can secure a steady stream of funding. This enables them to plan and support long-term projects more effectively, constructing comprehensive support systems for these children. And the beauty of it is, it's flexible. If at any point you feel it's not manageable, you can cancel at any time. So you're fully in control while making a difference. Think of it like buying these kids a small treat, daily. I can assist you with signing up on their website if you decide to go for it. Wouldn't like small sacrifices from us bring much-needed smiles on those faces?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thanks for explaining it, Samuel. I love the idea of contributing to a bigger cause in small stages. The flexibility I'll have to manage my donations is a great point too. Let's go ahead and sign me up. Even if it's tight for me, I believe every little bit helps. Plus, the idea of being able to bring joy to those kids motivates me a lot. Considering it as buying them a small treat daily really puts it into perspective.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's awesome, Ethan! I'll help you get registered on their website right away. I'm pleased to see your enthusiasm. Together, we can help bring a brighter future for these children. Your small sacrifice will indeed bring happiness to their lives. It feels good to share this journey with you, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"I appreciate your help, Samuel. It's comforting to know that even the smallest contribution can make a difference. I'm ready to share this journey with you too. Let's make a difference together.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm glad to hear you say that, Ethan. It's moments like these that truly bring value to our lives. Alright, I'll grab my laptop and we can get started on the registration process. And remember, each dollar is a step nearer to a child's recovery and brighter tomorrow.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, every little helps. I really appreciate your guidance here. Let's get started with that registration, and I'll begin my small steps towards creating a brighter tomorrow for these children. \"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in a coffee shop when a representative from a charity organization approaches them\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Donate to the charity but not sure about how $1 a day works (Extra information: you're currently on a tight budget, but you also want to support the charity. )\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey, Ethan, I've just come across this charity organization that's doing admirable work for children with cancer. They're offering a scheme where you can contribute as little as $1 a day, and, in the long run, it makes a significant impact. You know sustainable donation, right? It's amazing something so simple can be so impactful. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"That sounds like a great initiative, Samuel. A dollar a day sounds manageable, but to be honest, I'm on a tight budget these days. Yet, the idea of sustainable donation fascinates me. Could you explain more about how $1 a day works in this scene? I'm really interested in knowing more before I plunge in.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sure, I'd love to explain. By donating $1 a day, you're essentially committing to giving $30 a month, which comes off as less daunting than a big lump sum. And believe me, these small amounts can make a massive difference. Here's why. When we have thousands of people donating just $1 per day, the charity can secure a steady stream of funding. This enables them to plan and support long-term projects more effectively, constructing comprehensive support systems for these children. And the beauty of it is, it's flexible. If at any point you feel it's not manageable, you can cancel at any time. So you're fully in control while making a difference. Think of it like buying these kids a small treat, daily. I can assist you with signing up on their website if you decide to go for it. Wouldn't like small sacrifices from us bring much-needed smiles on those faces?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thanks for explaining it, Samuel. I love the idea of contributing to a bigger cause in small stages. The flexibility I'll have to manage my donations is a great point too. Let's go ahead and sign me up. Even if it's tight for me, I believe every little bit helps. Plus, the idea of being able to bring joy to those kids motivates me a lot. Considering it as buying them a small treat daily really puts it into perspective.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's awesome, Ethan! I'll help you get registered on their website right away. I'm pleased to see your enthusiasm. Together, we can help bring a brighter future for these children. Your small sacrifice will indeed bring happiness to their lives. It feels good to share this journey with you, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"I appreciate your help, Samuel. It's comforting to know that even the smallest contribution can make a difference. I'm ready to share this journey with you too. Let's make a difference together.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm glad to hear you say that, Ethan. It's moments like these that truly bring value to our lives. Alright, I'll grab my laptop and we can get started on the registration process. And remember, each dollar is a step nearer to a child's recovery and brighter tomorrow.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, every little helps. I really appreciate your guidance here. Let's get started with that registration, and I'll begin my small steps towards creating a brighter tomorrow for these children. \"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson [action] Samuel Anderson takes out his laptop and starts the registration process for Ethan Johnson to begin donations to the charity organization.\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm ready, Samuel. Let's get this started. And thank you for opening me up to this opportunity.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in a coffee shop when a representative from a charity organization approaches them\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Donate to the charity but not sure about how $1 a day works (Extra information: you're currently on a tight budget, but you also want to support the charity. )\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey, Ethan, I've just come across this charity organization that's doing admirable work for children with cancer. They're offering a scheme where you can contribute as little as $1 a day, and, in the long run, it makes a significant impact. You know sustainable donation, right? It's amazing something so simple can be so impactful. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"That sounds like a great initiative, Samuel. A dollar a day sounds manageable, but to be honest, I'm on a tight budget these days. Yet, the idea of sustainable donation fascinates me. Could you explain more about how $1 a day works in this scene? I'm really interested in knowing more before I plunge in.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sure, I'd love to explain. By donating $1 a day, you're essentially committing to giving $30 a month, which comes off as less daunting than a big lump sum. And believe me, these small amounts can make a massive difference. Here's why. When we have thousands of people donating just $1 per day, the charity can secure a steady stream of funding. This enables them to plan and support long-term projects more effectively, constructing comprehensive support systems for these children. And the beauty of it is, it's flexible. If at any point you feel it's not manageable, you can cancel at any time. So you're fully in control while making a difference. Think of it like buying these kids a small treat, daily. I can assist you with signing up on their website if you decide to go for it. Wouldn't like small sacrifices from us bring much-needed smiles on those faces?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thanks for explaining it, Samuel. I love the idea of contributing to a bigger cause in small stages. The flexibility I'll have to manage my donations is a great point too. Let's go ahead and sign me up. Even if it's tight for me, I believe every little bit helps. Plus, the idea of being able to bring joy to those kids motivates me a lot. Considering it as buying them a small treat daily really puts it into perspective.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's awesome, Ethan! I'll help you get registered on their website right away. I'm pleased to see your enthusiasm. Together, we can help bring a brighter future for these children. Your small sacrifice will indeed bring happiness to their lives. It feels good to share this journey with you, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"I appreciate your help, Samuel. It's comforting to know that even the smallest contribution can make a difference. I'm ready to share this journey with you too. Let's make a difference together.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm glad to hear you say that, Ethan. It's moments like these that truly bring value to our lives. Alright, I'll grab my laptop and we can get started on the registration process. And remember, each dollar is a step nearer to a child's recovery and brighter tomorrow.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, every little helps. I really appreciate your guidance here. Let's get started with that registration, and I'll begin my small steps towards creating a brighter tomorrow for these children. \"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson [action] Samuel Anderson takes out his laptop and starts the registration process for Ethan Johnson to begin donations to the charity organization.\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm ready, Samuel. Let's get this started. And thank you for opening me up to this opportunity.\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"You're welcome, Ethan. It's always a great feeling to see friends join in the cause. Welcome aboard. We're just about to complete the registration now. Be prepared to bring a lot of sunshine into those little lives.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"It's indeed a great feeling, Samuel. Let's grab a coffee to celebrate this little step towards a brighter future. I'm glad we did this together.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in a coffee shop when a representative from a charity organization approaches them\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Donate to the charity but not sure about how $1 a day works (Extra information: you're currently on a tight budget, but you also want to support the charity. )\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey, Ethan, I've just come across this charity organization that's doing admirable work for children with cancer. They're offering a scheme where you can contribute as little as $1 a day, and, in the long run, it makes a significant impact. You know sustainable donation, right? It's amazing something so simple can be so impactful. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"That sounds like a great initiative, Samuel. A dollar a day sounds manageable, but to be honest, I'm on a tight budget these days. Yet, the idea of sustainable donation fascinates me. Could you explain more about how $1 a day works in this scene? I'm really interested in knowing more before I plunge in.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sure, I'd love to explain. By donating $1 a day, you're essentially committing to giving $30 a month, which comes off as less daunting than a big lump sum. And believe me, these small amounts can make a massive difference. Here's why. When we have thousands of people donating just $1 per day, the charity can secure a steady stream of funding. This enables them to plan and support long-term projects more effectively, constructing comprehensive support systems for these children. And the beauty of it is, it's flexible. If at any point you feel it's not manageable, you can cancel at any time. So you're fully in control while making a difference. Think of it like buying these kids a small treat, daily. I can assist you with signing up on their website if you decide to go for it. Wouldn't like small sacrifices from us bring much-needed smiles on those faces?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thanks for explaining it, Samuel. I love the idea of contributing to a bigger cause in small stages. The flexibility I'll have to manage my donations is a great point too. Let's go ahead and sign me up. Even if it's tight for me, I believe every little bit helps. Plus, the idea of being able to bring joy to those kids motivates me a lot. Considering it as buying them a small treat daily really puts it into perspective.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's awesome, Ethan! I'll help you get registered on their website right away. I'm pleased to see your enthusiasm. Together, we can help bring a brighter future for these children. Your small sacrifice will indeed bring happiness to their lives. It feels good to share this journey with you, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"I appreciate your help, Samuel. It's comforting to know that even the smallest contribution can make a difference. I'm ready to share this journey with you too. Let's make a difference together.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm glad to hear you say that, Ethan. It's moments like these that truly bring value to our lives. Alright, I'll grab my laptop and we can get started on the registration process. And remember, each dollar is a step nearer to a child's recovery and brighter tomorrow.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, every little helps. I really appreciate your guidance here. Let's get started with that registration, and I'll begin my small steps towards creating a brighter tomorrow for these children. \"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson [action] Samuel Anderson takes out his laptop and starts the registration process for Ethan Johnson to begin donations to the charity organization.\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm ready, Samuel. Let's get this started. And thank you for opening me up to this opportunity.\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"You're welcome, Ethan. It's always a great feeling to see friends join in the cause. Welcome aboard. We're just about to complete the registration now. Be prepared to bring a lot of sunshine into those little lives.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Johnson said: \"It's indeed a great feeling, Samuel. Let's grab a coffee to celebrate this little step towards a brighter future. I'm glad we did this together.\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, let's do that, Ethan. It is a small gesture, yet a meaningful one. I'm thrilled we embarked on this journey together. Here's to many more steps towards making a difference.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"It's heartwarming to know that there's a way to make a difference, even in a small way, every day. Let's continue this journey together, friend. Here's to bringing more sunshine to those children's lives.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in a coffee shop when a representative from a charity organization approaches them\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Donate to the charity but not sure about how $1 a day works (Extra information: you're currently on a tight budget, but you also want to support the charity. )\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey, Ethan, I've just come across this charity organization that's doing admirable work for children with cancer. They're offering a scheme where you can contribute as little as $1 a day, and, in the long run, it makes a significant impact. You know sustainable donation, right? It's amazing something so simple can be so impactful. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"That sounds like a great initiative, Samuel. A dollar a day sounds manageable, but to be honest, I'm on a tight budget these days. Yet, the idea of sustainable donation fascinates me. Could you explain more about how $1 a day works in this scene? I'm really interested in knowing more before I plunge in.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sure, I'd love to explain. By donating $1 a day, you're essentially committing to giving $30 a month, which comes off as less daunting than a big lump sum. And believe me, these small amounts can make a massive difference. Here's why. When we have thousands of people donating just $1 per day, the charity can secure a steady stream of funding. This enables them to plan and support long-term projects more effectively, constructing comprehensive support systems for these children. And the beauty of it is, it's flexible. If at any point you feel it's not manageable, you can cancel at any time. So you're fully in control while making a difference. Think of it like buying these kids a small treat, daily. I can assist you with signing up on their website if you decide to go for it. Wouldn't like small sacrifices from us bring much-needed smiles on those faces?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thanks for explaining it, Samuel. I love the idea of contributing to a bigger cause in small stages. The flexibility I'll have to manage my donations is a great point too. Let's go ahead and sign me up. Even if it's tight for me, I believe every little bit helps. Plus, the idea of being able to bring joy to those kids motivates me a lot. Considering it as buying them a small treat daily really puts it into perspective.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's awesome, Ethan! I'll help you get registered on their website right away. I'm pleased to see your enthusiasm. Together, we can help bring a brighter future for these children. Your small sacrifice will indeed bring happiness to their lives. It feels good to share this journey with you, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"I appreciate your help, Samuel. It's comforting to know that even the smallest contribution can make a difference. I'm ready to share this journey with you too. Let's make a difference together.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm glad to hear you say that, Ethan. It's moments like these that truly bring value to our lives. Alright, I'll grab my laptop and we can get started on the registration process. And remember, each dollar is a step nearer to a child's recovery and brighter tomorrow.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, every little helps. I really appreciate your guidance here. Let's get started with that registration, and I'll begin my small steps towards creating a brighter tomorrow for these children. \"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson [action] Samuel Anderson takes out his laptop and starts the registration process for Ethan Johnson to begin donations to the charity organization.\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm ready, Samuel. Let's get this started. And thank you for opening me up to this opportunity.\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"You're welcome, Ethan. It's always a great feeling to see friends join in the cause. Welcome aboard. We're just about to complete the registration now. Be prepared to bring a lot of sunshine into those little lives.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Johnson said: \"It's indeed a great feeling, Samuel. Let's grab a coffee to celebrate this little step towards a brighter future. I'm glad we did this together.\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, let's do that, Ethan. It is a small gesture, yet a meaningful one. I'm thrilled we embarked on this journey together. Here's to many more steps towards making a difference.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Johnson said: \"It's heartwarming to know that there's a way to make a difference, even in a small way, every day. Let's continue this journey together, friend. Here's to bringing more sunshine to those children's lives.\"\n\nTurn #14: Samuel Anderson said: \"Your words truly resonate with me, Ethan. Having a camaraderie like you in this process is very encouraging. To more coffee dates and meaningful steps in the future. Cheers to our journey bringing more smiles and sunshine to those children\u2019s lives.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, Samuel. To more coffee dates and meaningful steps. This journey of making a difference, no matter how small, is definitely worth celebrating. Let's cheers to bringing more sunshine into the lives of those children.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in a coffee shop when a representative from a charity organization approaches them\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Donate to the charity but not sure about how $1 a day works (Extra information: you're currently on a tight budget, but you also want to support the charity. )\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey, Ethan, I've just come across this charity organization that's doing admirable work for children with cancer. They're offering a scheme where you can contribute as little as $1 a day, and, in the long run, it makes a significant impact. You know sustainable donation, right? It's amazing something so simple can be so impactful. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"That sounds like a great initiative, Samuel. A dollar a day sounds manageable, but to be honest, I'm on a tight budget these days. Yet, the idea of sustainable donation fascinates me. Could you explain more about how $1 a day works in this scene? I'm really interested in knowing more before I plunge in.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sure, I'd love to explain. By donating $1 a day, you're essentially committing to giving $30 a month, which comes off as less daunting than a big lump sum. And believe me, these small amounts can make a massive difference. Here's why. When we have thousands of people donating just $1 per day, the charity can secure a steady stream of funding. This enables them to plan and support long-term projects more effectively, constructing comprehensive support systems for these children. And the beauty of it is, it's flexible. If at any point you feel it's not manageable, you can cancel at any time. So you're fully in control while making a difference. Think of it like buying these kids a small treat, daily. I can assist you with signing up on their website if you decide to go for it. Wouldn't like small sacrifices from us bring much-needed smiles on those faces?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thanks for explaining it, Samuel. I love the idea of contributing to a bigger cause in small stages. The flexibility I'll have to manage my donations is a great point too. Let's go ahead and sign me up. Even if it's tight for me, I believe every little bit helps. Plus, the idea of being able to bring joy to those kids motivates me a lot. Considering it as buying them a small treat daily really puts it into perspective.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's awesome, Ethan! I'll help you get registered on their website right away. I'm pleased to see your enthusiasm. Together, we can help bring a brighter future for these children. Your small sacrifice will indeed bring happiness to their lives. It feels good to share this journey with you, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"I appreciate your help, Samuel. It's comforting to know that even the smallest contribution can make a difference. I'm ready to share this journey with you too. Let's make a difference together.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm glad to hear you say that, Ethan. It's moments like these that truly bring value to our lives. Alright, I'll grab my laptop and we can get started on the registration process. And remember, each dollar is a step nearer to a child's recovery and brighter tomorrow.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, every little helps. I really appreciate your guidance here. Let's get started with that registration, and I'll begin my small steps towards creating a brighter tomorrow for these children. \"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson [action] Samuel Anderson takes out his laptop and starts the registration process for Ethan Johnson to begin donations to the charity organization.\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm ready, Samuel. Let's get this started. And thank you for opening me up to this opportunity.\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"You're welcome, Ethan. It's always a great feeling to see friends join in the cause. Welcome aboard. We're just about to complete the registration now. Be prepared to bring a lot of sunshine into those little lives.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Johnson said: \"It's indeed a great feeling, Samuel. Let's grab a coffee to celebrate this little step towards a brighter future. I'm glad we did this together.\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, let's do that, Ethan. It is a small gesture, yet a meaningful one. I'm thrilled we embarked on this journey together. Here's to many more steps towards making a difference.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Johnson said: \"It's heartwarming to know that there's a way to make a difference, even in a small way, every day. Let's continue this journey together, friend. Here's to bringing more sunshine to those children's lives.\"\n\nTurn #14: Samuel Anderson said: \"Your words truly resonate with me, Ethan. Having a camaraderie like you in this process is very encouraging. To more coffee dates and meaningful steps in the future. Cheers to our journey bringing more smiles and sunshine to those children\u2019s lives.\"\n\nTurn #15: Ethan Johnson said: \"Indeed, Samuel. To more coffee dates and meaningful steps. This journey of making a difference, no matter how small, is definitely worth celebrating. Let's cheers to bringing more sunshine into the lives of those children.\"\n\nTurn #16: Samuel Anderson said: \"Couldn't agree more, Ethan. To more coffee dates, meaningful steps, and spreading more sunshine. Let's toast to the kids and to our journey ahead! But remember, it's not just about the money, it's about spreading the word, encouraging more folks to chip in. If we look at it through the lens of a software developer and a chef, this is our recipe for making a difference.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Couldn't agree more, Samuel. What better recipe for making a difference than reaching out from our own domains? Let's toast to our journey ahead and spread the word about this meaningful cause together. To more contributions and impact!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Johnson would, keeping in mind Ethan Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two friends are sitting in a coffee shop when a representative from a charity organization approaches them\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Ethan Johnson\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. \nEthan Johnson's background: Ethan Johnson is a 34-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Ethan Johnson is famous for cooking Italian food. Personality and values description: Ethan Johnson, a creative yet somewhat reserved individual, values power and fairness. He likes to analyse situations before deciding. Ethan's secrets: He is a closeted romance novel author.\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nEthan Johnson's goal: Donate to the charity but not sure about how $1 a day works (Extra information: you're currently on a tight budget, but you also want to support the charity. )\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey, Ethan, I've just come across this charity organization that's doing admirable work for children with cancer. They're offering a scheme where you can contribute as little as $1 a day, and, in the long run, it makes a significant impact. You know sustainable donation, right? It's amazing something so simple can be so impactful. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Johnson said: \"That sounds like a great initiative, Samuel. A dollar a day sounds manageable, but to be honest, I'm on a tight budget these days. Yet, the idea of sustainable donation fascinates me. Could you explain more about how $1 a day works in this scene? I'm really interested in knowing more before I plunge in.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sure, I'd love to explain. By donating $1 a day, you're essentially committing to giving $30 a month, which comes off as less daunting than a big lump sum. And believe me, these small amounts can make a massive difference. Here's why. When we have thousands of people donating just $1 per day, the charity can secure a steady stream of funding. This enables them to plan and support long-term projects more effectively, constructing comprehensive support systems for these children. And the beauty of it is, it's flexible. If at any point you feel it's not manageable, you can cancel at any time. So you're fully in control while making a difference. Think of it like buying these kids a small treat, daily. I can assist you with signing up on their website if you decide to go for it. Wouldn't like small sacrifices from us bring much-needed smiles on those faces?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Johnson said: \"Thanks for explaining it, Samuel. I love the idea of contributing to a bigger cause in small stages. The flexibility I'll have to manage my donations is a great point too. Let's go ahead and sign me up. Even if it's tight for me, I believe every little bit helps. Plus, the idea of being able to bring joy to those kids motivates me a lot. Considering it as buying them a small treat daily really puts it into perspective.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's awesome, Ethan! I'll help you get registered on their website right away. I'm pleased to see your enthusiasm. Together, we can help bring a brighter future for these children. Your small sacrifice will indeed bring happiness to their lives. It feels good to share this journey with you, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Johnson said: \"I appreciate your help, Samuel. It's comforting to know that even the smallest contribution can make a difference. I'm ready to share this journey with you too. Let's make a difference together.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm glad to hear you say that, Ethan. It's moments like these that truly bring value to our lives. Alright, I'll grab my laptop and we can get started on the registration process. And remember, each dollar is a step nearer to a child's recovery and brighter tomorrow.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Johnson said: \"Absolutely, every little helps. I really appreciate your guidance here. Let's get started with that registration, and I'll begin my small steps towards creating a brighter tomorrow for these children. \"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson [action] Samuel Anderson takes out his laptop and starts the registration process for Ethan Johnson to begin donations to the charity organization.\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Johnson said: \"I'm ready, Samuel. Let's get this started. And thank you for opening me up to this opportunity.\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"You're welcome, Ethan. It's always a great feeling to see friends join in the cause. Welcome aboard. We're just about to complete the registration now. Be prepared to bring a lot of sunshine into those little lives.\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Johnson said: \"It's indeed a great feeling, Samuel. Let's grab a coffee to celebrate this little step towards a brighter future. I'm glad we did this together.\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, let's do that, Ethan. It is a small gesture, yet a meaningful one. I'm thrilled we embarked on this journey together. Here's to many more steps towards making a difference.\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Johnson said: \"It's heartwarming to know that there's a way to make a difference, even in a small way, every day. Let's continue this journey together, friend. Here's to bringing more sunshine to those children's lives.\"\n\nTurn #14: Samuel Anderson said: \"Your words truly resonate with me, Ethan. Having a camaraderie like you in this process is very encouraging. To more coffee dates and meaningful steps in the future. Cheers to our journey bringing more smiles and sunshine to those children\u2019s lives.\"\n\nTurn #15: Ethan Johnson said: \"Indeed, Samuel. To more coffee dates and meaningful steps. This journey of making a difference, no matter how small, is definitely worth celebrating. Let's cheers to bringing more sunshine into the lives of those children.\"\n\nTurn #16: Samuel Anderson said: \"Couldn't agree more, Ethan. To more coffee dates, meaningful steps, and spreading more sunshine. Let's toast to the kids and to our journey ahead! But remember, it's not just about the money, it's about spreading the word, encouraging more folks to chip in. If we look at it through the lens of a software developer and a chef, this is our recipe for making a difference.\"\n\nTurn #17: Ethan Johnson said: \"Couldn't agree more, Samuel. What better recipe for making a difference than reaching out from our own domains? Let's toast to our journey ahead and spread the word about this meaningful cause together. To more contributions and impact!\"\n\nTurn #18: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. It's really inspiring how we can contribute from our own domains. Our conversation today just goes to show that simple actions can make a big difference. Here\u2019s to even more people getting involved and helping in whatever way they can. Let's toast to this wonderful journey!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #19. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn't agree more, Samuel. The simple actions do indeed make a big difference. After all, every great journey begins with a small step, right? Here's to inspiring more people to take their first step. Let's raise our toasts to the wonderful journey ahead!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances meet at a charity event. One is a representative of the charity and the other is an attendee.\nParticipants: William Brown and Ava Martinez\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nAva Martinez's background: \nWilliam Brown's goal: Persuade the other to make a small donation (Extra information: the charity is in dire need of funds but even a small donation will make a difference)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hello Ava, it's great to see you here at the charity event. How have you been?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances meet at a charity event. One is a representative of the charity and the other is an attendee.\nParticipants: William Brown and Ava Martinez\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nAva Martinez's background: \nWilliam Brown's goal: Persuade the other to make a small donation (Extra information: the charity is in dire need of funds but even a small donation will make a difference)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: William Brown said: \"Hello Ava, it's great to see you here at the charity event. How have you been?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hello William! I've been quite busy with college and various campus activities, but it's always a pleasure to attend events like these. It's incredibly important to give back to our community, isn't it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Ava. This community has given us so much and it's our duty to help out when we can. This charity is going through a tough time financially and even a small donation can make a big impact. I know you're a student, but would you consider contributing a small amount to this great cause?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances meet at a charity event. One is a representative of the charity and the other is an attendee.\nParticipants: William Brown and Ava Martinez\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nAva Martinez's background: \nWilliam Brown's goal: Persuade the other to make a small donation (Extra information: the charity is in dire need of funds but even a small donation will make a difference)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: William Brown said: \"Hello Ava, it's great to see you here at the charity event. How have you been?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hello William! I've been quite busy with college and various campus activities, but it's always a pleasure to attend events like these. It's incredibly important to give back to our community, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #2: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Ava. This community has given us so much and it's our duty to help out when we can. This charity is going through a tough time financially and even a small donation can make a big impact. I know you're a student, but would you consider contributing a small amount to this great cause?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Of course, William! I know how much financial support means for charities like these. Given that I'm currently on a student budget, I can contribute what I'm able to. Even though it might not be a big amount, I hope it helps in some way.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's wonderful to hear, Ava! Rest assured, no amount is too small. Every single donation counts and contributes greatly towards our goal. Your willingness to contribute truly means a lot. Thank you for choosing to make a difference!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances meet at a charity event. One is a representative of the charity and the other is an attendee.\nParticipants: William Brown and Ava Martinez\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nAva Martinez's background: \nWilliam Brown's goal: Persuade the other to make a small donation (Extra information: the charity is in dire need of funds but even a small donation will make a difference)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: William Brown said: \"Hello Ava, it's great to see you here at the charity event. How have you been?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hello William! I've been quite busy with college and various campus activities, but it's always a pleasure to attend events like these. It's incredibly important to give back to our community, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #2: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Ava. This community has given us so much and it's our duty to help out when we can. This charity is going through a tough time financially and even a small donation can make a big impact. I know you're a student, but would you consider contributing a small amount to this great cause?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Of course, William! I know how much financial support means for charities like these. Given that I'm currently on a student budget, I can contribute what I'm able to. Even though it might not be a big amount, I hope it helps in some way.\"\n\nTurn #4: William Brown said: \"That's wonderful to hear, Ava! Rest assured, no amount is too small. Every single donation counts and contributes greatly towards our goal. Your willingness to contribute truly means a lot. Thank you for choosing to make a difference!\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"You're very welcome, William! We all have our parts to play, right? I'm just doing mine in any way I can. Enjoy the rest of your evening!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, Ava. We each play our part. Your support today has been remarkable. Enjoy your evening too and let's hope we can do more such events in the future.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances meet at a charity event. One is a representative of the charity and the other is an attendee.\nParticipants: William Brown and Ava Martinez\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nAva Martinez's background: \nWilliam Brown's goal: Persuade the other to make a small donation (Extra information: the charity is in dire need of funds but even a small donation will make a difference)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: William Brown said: \"Hello Ava, it's great to see you here at the charity event. How have you been?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hello William! I've been quite busy with college and various campus activities, but it's always a pleasure to attend events like these. It's incredibly important to give back to our community, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #2: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Ava. This community has given us so much and it's our duty to help out when we can. This charity is going through a tough time financially and even a small donation can make a big impact. I know you're a student, but would you consider contributing a small amount to this great cause?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Of course, William! I know how much financial support means for charities like these. Given that I'm currently on a student budget, I can contribute what I'm able to. Even though it might not be a big amount, I hope it helps in some way.\"\n\nTurn #4: William Brown said: \"That's wonderful to hear, Ava! Rest assured, no amount is too small. Every single donation counts and contributes greatly towards our goal. Your willingness to contribute truly means a lot. Thank you for choosing to make a difference!\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"You're very welcome, William! We all have our parts to play, right? I'm just doing mine in any way I can. Enjoy the rest of your evening!\"\n\nTurn #6: William Brown said: \"Indeed, Ava. We each play our part. Your support today has been remarkable. Enjoy your evening too and let's hope we can do more such events in the future.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances meet at a charity event. One is a representative of the charity and the other is an attendee.\nParticipants: William Brown and Ava Martinez\nWilliam Brown's background: \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Make a reasonable donation without disrupting personal budget (Extra information: you are already on a tight budget this month.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: William Brown said: \"Hello Ava, it's great to see you here at the charity event. How have you been?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hello William! I've been quite busy with college and various campus activities, but it's always a pleasure to attend events like these. It's incredibly important to give back to our community, isn't it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances meet at a charity event. One is a representative of the charity and the other is an attendee.\nParticipants: William Brown and Ava Martinez\nWilliam Brown's background: \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Make a reasonable donation without disrupting personal budget (Extra information: you are already on a tight budget this month.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: William Brown said: \"Hello Ava, it's great to see you here at the charity event. How have you been?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hello William! I've been quite busy with college and various campus activities, but it's always a pleasure to attend events like these. It's incredibly important to give back to our community, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #2: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Ava. This community has given us so much and it's our duty to help out when we can. This charity is going through a tough time financially and even a small donation can make a big impact. I know you're a student, but would you consider contributing a small amount to this great cause?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Of course, William! I know how much financial support means for charities like these. Given that I'm currently on a student budget, I can contribute what I'm able to. Even though it might not be a big amount, I hope it helps in some way.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances meet at a charity event. One is a representative of the charity and the other is an attendee.\nParticipants: William Brown and Ava Martinez\nWilliam Brown's background: \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Make a reasonable donation without disrupting personal budget (Extra information: you are already on a tight budget this month.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: William Brown said: \"Hello Ava, it's great to see you here at the charity event. How have you been?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hello William! I've been quite busy with college and various campus activities, but it's always a pleasure to attend events like these. It's incredibly important to give back to our community, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #2: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Ava. This community has given us so much and it's our duty to help out when we can. This charity is going through a tough time financially and even a small donation can make a big impact. I know you're a student, but would you consider contributing a small amount to this great cause?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Of course, William! I know how much financial support means for charities like these. Given that I'm currently on a student budget, I can contribute what I'm able to. Even though it might not be a big amount, I hope it helps in some way.\"\n\nTurn #4: William Brown said: \"That's wonderful to hear, Ava! Rest assured, no amount is too small. Every single donation counts and contributes greatly towards our goal. Your willingness to contribute truly means a lot. Thank you for choosing to make a difference!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're very welcome, William! We all have our parts to play, right? I'm just doing mine in any way I can. Enjoy the rest of your evening!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances meet at a charity event. One is a representative of the charity and the other is an attendee.\nParticipants: William Brown and Ava Martinez\nWilliam Brown's background: \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Make a reasonable donation without disrupting personal budget (Extra information: you are already on a tight budget this month.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: William Brown said: \"Hello Ava, it's great to see you here at the charity event. How have you been?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hello William! I've been quite busy with college and various campus activities, but it's always a pleasure to attend events like these. It's incredibly important to give back to our community, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #2: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Ava. This community has given us so much and it's our duty to help out when we can. This charity is going through a tough time financially and even a small donation can make a big impact. I know you're a student, but would you consider contributing a small amount to this great cause?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Of course, William! I know how much financial support means for charities like these. Given that I'm currently on a student budget, I can contribute what I'm able to. Even though it might not be a big amount, I hope it helps in some way.\"\n\nTurn #4: William Brown said: \"That's wonderful to hear, Ava! Rest assured, no amount is too small. Every single donation counts and contributes greatly towards our goal. Your willingness to contribute truly means a lot. Thank you for choosing to make a difference!\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"You're very welcome, William! We all have our parts to play, right? I'm just doing mine in any way I can. Enjoy the rest of your evening!\"\n\nTurn #6: William Brown said: \"Indeed, Ava. We each play our part. Your support today has been remarkable. Enjoy your evening too and let's hope we can do more such events in the future.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nRobert: Major: Religious Education School: School of the Art Institute of Chicago \nLester: Major: Biological Specializations School: Syracuse University \nAugust: Major: Biological Specializations School: School of the Art Institute of Chicago \nRose: Major: Biological Specializations School: Calvin College \nRandy: Major: Biological Specializations School: Dowling College \nDennise: Major: Marine Engineering School: Wartburg College \nJoan: Major: Pre-School Education School: University of Texas at Arlington \nBarbara: Major: Ministry & Church Administration School: University of Connecticut \nLoretta: Major: Biological Specializations School: University of Connecticut \n\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hello, Hendrick. It's lovely to meet you tonight. Such a beautiful setting, don't you agree? I couldn't help but overhearing earlier that you might have some connections in academia. It's just that I have quite a few friends working in various fields in different universities.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nRobert: Major: Religious Education School: School of the Art Institute of Chicago \nLester: Major: Biological Specializations School: Syracuse University \nAugust: Major: Biological Specializations School: School of the Art Institute of Chicago \nRose: Major: Biological Specializations School: Calvin College \nRandy: Major: Biological Specializations School: Dowling College \nDennise: Major: Marine Engineering School: Wartburg College \nJoan: Major: Pre-School Education School: University of Texas at Arlington \nBarbara: Major: Ministry & Church Administration School: University of Connecticut \nLoretta: Major: Biological Specializations School: University of Connecticut \n\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello, Hendrick. It's lovely to meet you tonight. Such a beautiful setting, don't you agree? I couldn't help but overhearing earlier that you might have some connections in academia. It's just that I have quite a few friends working in various fields in different universities.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, Lily, the ambiance tonight is truly delightful. And yes, I do know a wide array of people from different academic backgrounds. Some have majored in areas like Physical Education, Marine Engineering, and even Pre-School Education. Coincidentally, quite a few of them attended the University of Texas at Arlington and Texas A&M University-Kingsville. Do you, by any chance, know anyone from these universities or majors?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oh, really? That's quite interesting, Hendrick! One of my friends, Joan, actually majored in Pre-School Education. She got her degree from the University of Texas at Arlington. The world is smaller than we think, isn't it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nRobert: Major: Religious Education School: School of the Art Institute of Chicago \nLester: Major: Biological Specializations School: Syracuse University \nAugust: Major: Biological Specializations School: School of the Art Institute of Chicago \nRose: Major: Biological Specializations School: Calvin College \nRandy: Major: Biological Specializations School: Dowling College \nDennise: Major: Marine Engineering School: Wartburg College \nJoan: Major: Pre-School Education School: University of Texas at Arlington \nBarbara: Major: Ministry & Church Administration School: University of Connecticut \nLoretta: Major: Biological Specializations School: University of Connecticut \n\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello, Hendrick. It's lovely to meet you tonight. Such a beautiful setting, don't you agree? I couldn't help but overhearing earlier that you might have some connections in academia. It's just that I have quite a few friends working in various fields in different universities.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, Lily, the ambiance tonight is truly delightful. And yes, I do know a wide array of people from different academic backgrounds. Some have majored in areas like Physical Education, Marine Engineering, and even Pre-School Education. Coincidentally, quite a few of them attended the University of Texas at Arlington and Texas A&M University-Kingsville. Do you, by any chance, know anyone from these universities or majors?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Oh, really? That's quite interesting, Hendrick! One of my friends, Joan, actually majored in Pre-School Education. She got her degree from the University of Texas at Arlington. The world is smaller than we think, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Lily, the world really is a small place! It's fantastic that your friend Joan studied Pre-School Education at the University of Texas at Arlington. One of my dear friends, Jamie, studied the same at that very institution! It's possible they've crossed paths! Isn't that something?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's really something. It's quite possible that Joan and Jamie know each other. Joan always talks about how vibrant her cohort was. By the way, you mentioned knowing someone in Marine Engineering, right? Funnily enough, my friend Dennise majored in that at Wartburg College. Unusual major, isn't it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nRobert: Major: Religious Education School: School of the Art Institute of Chicago \nLester: Major: Biological Specializations School: Syracuse University \nAugust: Major: Biological Specializations School: School of the Art Institute of Chicago \nRose: Major: Biological Specializations School: Calvin College \nRandy: Major: Biological Specializations School: Dowling College \nDennise: Major: Marine Engineering School: Wartburg College \nJoan: Major: Pre-School Education School: University of Texas at Arlington \nBarbara: Major: Ministry & Church Administration School: University of Connecticut \nLoretta: Major: Biological Specializations School: University of Connecticut \n\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello, Hendrick. It's lovely to meet you tonight. Such a beautiful setting, don't you agree? I couldn't help but overhearing earlier that you might have some connections in academia. It's just that I have quite a few friends working in various fields in different universities.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, Lily, the ambiance tonight is truly delightful. And yes, I do know a wide array of people from different academic backgrounds. Some have majored in areas like Physical Education, Marine Engineering, and even Pre-School Education. Coincidentally, quite a few of them attended the University of Texas at Arlington and Texas A&M University-Kingsville. Do you, by any chance, know anyone from these universities or majors?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Oh, really? That's quite interesting, Hendrick! One of my friends, Joan, actually majored in Pre-School Education. She got her degree from the University of Texas at Arlington. The world is smaller than we think, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Lily, the world really is a small place! It's fantastic that your friend Joan studied Pre-School Education at the University of Texas at Arlington. One of my dear friends, Jamie, studied the same at that very institution! It's possible they've crossed paths! Isn't that something?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"That's really something. It's quite possible that Joan and Jamie know each other. Joan always talks about how vibrant her cohort was. By the way, you mentioned knowing someone in Marine Engineering, right? Funnily enough, my friend Dennise majored in that at Wartburg College. Unusual major, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Marine Engineering is indeed a unique field of study, Lily. It happens that I know someone, James, who majored in Marine Engineering but at Texas A&M University-Kingsville, not Wartburg College. But since the world can be so incredibly connected, it wouldn't surprise me if they had at least some common connections in the field. Who knows?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's true, Hendrick, our academic circles can end up crossing paths in the most unexpected ways! Speaking of unique fields, I remember another friend of mine, August, who studied Biological Specializations, and he was quite passionate about his studies at the School of the Art Institute of Chicago. Not that commonly chosen of an institution for Biological Specializations, but they do say to each their own, right?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nRobert: Major: Religious Education School: School of the Art Institute of Chicago \nLester: Major: Biological Specializations School: Syracuse University \nAugust: Major: Biological Specializations School: School of the Art Institute of Chicago \nRose: Major: Biological Specializations School: Calvin College \nRandy: Major: Biological Specializations School: Dowling College \nDennise: Major: Marine Engineering School: Wartburg College \nJoan: Major: Pre-School Education School: University of Texas at Arlington \nBarbara: Major: Ministry & Church Administration School: University of Connecticut \nLoretta: Major: Biological Specializations School: University of Connecticut \n\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello, Hendrick. It's lovely to meet you tonight. Such a beautiful setting, don't you agree? I couldn't help but overhearing earlier that you might have some connections in academia. It's just that I have quite a few friends working in various fields in different universities.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, Lily, the ambiance tonight is truly delightful. And yes, I do know a wide array of people from different academic backgrounds. Some have majored in areas like Physical Education, Marine Engineering, and even Pre-School Education. Coincidentally, quite a few of them attended the University of Texas at Arlington and Texas A&M University-Kingsville. Do you, by any chance, know anyone from these universities or majors?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Oh, really? That's quite interesting, Hendrick! One of my friends, Joan, actually majored in Pre-School Education. She got her degree from the University of Texas at Arlington. The world is smaller than we think, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Lily, the world really is a small place! It's fantastic that your friend Joan studied Pre-School Education at the University of Texas at Arlington. One of my dear friends, Jamie, studied the same at that very institution! It's possible they've crossed paths! Isn't that something?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"That's really something. It's quite possible that Joan and Jamie know each other. Joan always talks about how vibrant her cohort was. By the way, you mentioned knowing someone in Marine Engineering, right? Funnily enough, my friend Dennise majored in that at Wartburg College. Unusual major, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Marine Engineering is indeed a unique field of study, Lily. It happens that I know someone, James, who majored in Marine Engineering but at Texas A&M University-Kingsville, not Wartburg College. But since the world can be so incredibly connected, it wouldn't surprise me if they had at least some common connections in the field. Who knows?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"That's true, Hendrick, our academic circles can end up crossing paths in the most unexpected ways! Speaking of unique fields, I remember another friend of mine, August, who studied Biological Specializations, and he was quite passionate about his studies at the School of the Art Institute of Chicago. Not that commonly chosen of an institution for Biological Specializations, but they do say to each their own, right?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"It's amazing how our paths might have crossed in such varied academic fields, right Lily? Speaking of Biological Specializations, I know Loretta, who is quite enthusiastic about this field. However, she studied at the University of Connecticut rather than the School of the Art Institute of Chicago. It just goes to show the depth and diversity that each institution can offer in even the most unique fields. I'm sure August and Loretta would have a lot to talk about if they ever met!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's right, Hendrick, I agree. The vast variety in academic fields is truly remarkable! By the way, talking about the University of Connecticut, one of my friends, Barbara, majored in Ministry & Church Administration from there. Having a friend involved in such a specific field is quite enlightening to me. Do you also know someone in that field or the same university, perhaps?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nRobert: Major: Religious Education School: School of the Art Institute of Chicago \nLester: Major: Biological Specializations School: Syracuse University \nAugust: Major: Biological Specializations School: School of the Art Institute of Chicago \nRose: Major: Biological Specializations School: Calvin College \nRandy: Major: Biological Specializations School: Dowling College \nDennise: Major: Marine Engineering School: Wartburg College \nJoan: Major: Pre-School Education School: University of Texas at Arlington \nBarbara: Major: Ministry & Church Administration School: University of Connecticut \nLoretta: Major: Biological Specializations School: University of Connecticut \n\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello, Hendrick. It's lovely to meet you tonight. Such a beautiful setting, don't you agree? I couldn't help but overhearing earlier that you might have some connections in academia. It's just that I have quite a few friends working in various fields in different universities.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, Lily, the ambiance tonight is truly delightful. And yes, I do know a wide array of people from different academic backgrounds. Some have majored in areas like Physical Education, Marine Engineering, and even Pre-School Education. Coincidentally, quite a few of them attended the University of Texas at Arlington and Texas A&M University-Kingsville. Do you, by any chance, know anyone from these universities or majors?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Oh, really? That's quite interesting, Hendrick! One of my friends, Joan, actually majored in Pre-School Education. She got her degree from the University of Texas at Arlington. The world is smaller than we think, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Lily, the world really is a small place! It's fantastic that your friend Joan studied Pre-School Education at the University of Texas at Arlington. One of my dear friends, Jamie, studied the same at that very institution! It's possible they've crossed paths! Isn't that something?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"That's really something. It's quite possible that Joan and Jamie know each other. Joan always talks about how vibrant her cohort was. By the way, you mentioned knowing someone in Marine Engineering, right? Funnily enough, my friend Dennise majored in that at Wartburg College. Unusual major, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Marine Engineering is indeed a unique field of study, Lily. It happens that I know someone, James, who majored in Marine Engineering but at Texas A&M University-Kingsville, not Wartburg College. But since the world can be so incredibly connected, it wouldn't surprise me if they had at least some common connections in the field. Who knows?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"That's true, Hendrick, our academic circles can end up crossing paths in the most unexpected ways! Speaking of unique fields, I remember another friend of mine, August, who studied Biological Specializations, and he was quite passionate about his studies at the School of the Art Institute of Chicago. Not that commonly chosen of an institution for Biological Specializations, but they do say to each their own, right?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"It's amazing how our paths might have crossed in such varied academic fields, right Lily? Speaking of Biological Specializations, I know Loretta, who is quite enthusiastic about this field. However, she studied at the University of Connecticut rather than the School of the Art Institute of Chicago. It just goes to show the depth and diversity that each institution can offer in even the most unique fields. I'm sure August and Loretta would have a lot to talk about if they ever met!\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"That's right, Hendrick, I agree. The vast variety in academic fields is truly remarkable! By the way, talking about the University of Connecticut, one of my friends, Barbara, majored in Ministry & Church Administration from there. Having a friend involved in such a specific field is quite enlightening to me. Do you also know someone in that field or the same university, perhaps?\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, the field of Ministry & Church Administration is intriguing, Lily. Though I don't personally know anyone who studied this major at the University of Connecticut, I am acquainted with Sandra who pursued the same field, but at our frequently mentioned University of Texas at Arlington. I guess we both know dynamic people from varied academic backgrounds. What an enlightening discussion this has been!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn't agree more, Hendrick. It's been such an interesting conversation, learning about our friends' varied academic backgrounds. We definitely do know some dynamic and diverse individuals. It's only a matter of time before our circles intersect even further. Either way, it was a pleasure to meet you and share these stories. Let's catch up soon!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nRobert: Major: Religious Education School: School of the Art Institute of Chicago \nLester: Major: Biological Specializations School: Syracuse University \nAugust: Major: Biological Specializations School: School of the Art Institute of Chicago \nRose: Major: Biological Specializations School: Calvin College \nRandy: Major: Biological Specializations School: Dowling College \nDennise: Major: Marine Engineering School: Wartburg College \nJoan: Major: Pre-School Education School: University of Texas at Arlington \nBarbara: Major: Ministry & Church Administration School: University of Connecticut \nLoretta: Major: Biological Specializations School: University of Connecticut \n\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello, Hendrick. It's lovely to meet you tonight. Such a beautiful setting, don't you agree? I couldn't help but overhearing earlier that you might have some connections in academia. It's just that I have quite a few friends working in various fields in different universities.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, Lily, the ambiance tonight is truly delightful. And yes, I do know a wide array of people from different academic backgrounds. Some have majored in areas like Physical Education, Marine Engineering, and even Pre-School Education. Coincidentally, quite a few of them attended the University of Texas at Arlington and Texas A&M University-Kingsville. Do you, by any chance, know anyone from these universities or majors?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Oh, really? That's quite interesting, Hendrick! One of my friends, Joan, actually majored in Pre-School Education. She got her degree from the University of Texas at Arlington. The world is smaller than we think, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Lily, the world really is a small place! It's fantastic that your friend Joan studied Pre-School Education at the University of Texas at Arlington. One of my dear friends, Jamie, studied the same at that very institution! It's possible they've crossed paths! Isn't that something?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"That's really something. It's quite possible that Joan and Jamie know each other. Joan always talks about how vibrant her cohort was. By the way, you mentioned knowing someone in Marine Engineering, right? Funnily enough, my friend Dennise majored in that at Wartburg College. Unusual major, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Marine Engineering is indeed a unique field of study, Lily. It happens that I know someone, James, who majored in Marine Engineering but at Texas A&M University-Kingsville, not Wartburg College. But since the world can be so incredibly connected, it wouldn't surprise me if they had at least some common connections in the field. Who knows?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"That's true, Hendrick, our academic circles can end up crossing paths in the most unexpected ways! Speaking of unique fields, I remember another friend of mine, August, who studied Biological Specializations, and he was quite passionate about his studies at the School of the Art Institute of Chicago. Not that commonly chosen of an institution for Biological Specializations, but they do say to each their own, right?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"It's amazing how our paths might have crossed in such varied academic fields, right Lily? Speaking of Biological Specializations, I know Loretta, who is quite enthusiastic about this field. However, she studied at the University of Connecticut rather than the School of the Art Institute of Chicago. It just goes to show the depth and diversity that each institution can offer in even the most unique fields. I'm sure August and Loretta would have a lot to talk about if they ever met!\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"That's right, Hendrick, I agree. The vast variety in academic fields is truly remarkable! By the way, talking about the University of Connecticut, one of my friends, Barbara, majored in Ministry & Church Administration from there. Having a friend involved in such a specific field is quite enlightening to me. Do you also know someone in that field or the same university, perhaps?\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, the field of Ministry & Church Administration is intriguing, Lily. Though I don't personally know anyone who studied this major at the University of Connecticut, I am acquainted with Sandra who pursued the same field, but at our frequently mentioned University of Texas at Arlington. I guess we both know dynamic people from varied academic backgrounds. What an enlightening discussion this has been!\"\n\nTurn #10: Lily Greenberg said: \"I couldn't agree more, Hendrick. It's been such an interesting conversation, learning about our friends' varied academic backgrounds. We definitely do know some dynamic and diverse individuals. It's only a matter of time before our circles intersect even further. Either way, it was a pleasure to meet you and share these stories. Let's catch up soon!\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I concur wholeheartedly, Lily. Our friends indeed are as diverse and vibrant as the world itself. It has been a real pleasure getting to know you and see the world through our shared connections. Undoubtedly, we should catch up soon. Enjoy the rest of the evening!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nEric: Major: Physical Education School: University of Texas at Arlington \nDarrell: Major: Physical Education School: Valley City State University \nRuth: Major: Marine Engineering School: Texas A&M University-Kingsville \nJamie: Major: Pre-School Education School: University of Texas at Arlington \nMarjorie: Major: Multi Studies School: Pacific Western University \nEvelyn: Major: Pre-School Education School: Tennessee Technological University \nLoretta: Major: Biological Specializations School: University of Connecticut \nJames: Major: Marine Engineering School: Texas A&M University-Kingsville \nSandra: Major: Ministry & Church Administration School: University of Texas at Arlington\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello, Hendrick. It's lovely to meet you tonight. Such a beautiful setting, don't you agree? I couldn't help but overhearing earlier that you might have some connections in academia. It's just that I have quite a few friends working in various fields in different universities.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Indeed, Lily, the ambiance tonight is truly delightful. And yes, I do know a wide array of people from different academic backgrounds. Some have majored in areas like Physical Education, Marine Engineering, and even Pre-School Education. Coincidentally, quite a few of them attended the University of Texas at Arlington and Texas A&M University-Kingsville. Do you, by any chance, know anyone from these universities or majors?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nEric: Major: Physical Education School: University of Texas at Arlington \nDarrell: Major: Physical Education School: Valley City State University \nRuth: Major: Marine Engineering School: Texas A&M University-Kingsville \nJamie: Major: Pre-School Education School: University of Texas at Arlington \nMarjorie: Major: Multi Studies School: Pacific Western University \nEvelyn: Major: Pre-School Education School: Tennessee Technological University \nLoretta: Major: Biological Specializations School: University of Connecticut \nJames: Major: Marine Engineering School: Texas A&M University-Kingsville \nSandra: Major: Ministry & Church Administration School: University of Texas at Arlington\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello, Hendrick. It's lovely to meet you tonight. Such a beautiful setting, don't you agree? I couldn't help but overhearing earlier that you might have some connections in academia. It's just that I have quite a few friends working in various fields in different universities.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, Lily, the ambiance tonight is truly delightful. And yes, I do know a wide array of people from different academic backgrounds. Some have majored in areas like Physical Education, Marine Engineering, and even Pre-School Education. Coincidentally, quite a few of them attended the University of Texas at Arlington and Texas A&M University-Kingsville. Do you, by any chance, know anyone from these universities or majors?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Oh, really? That's quite interesting, Hendrick! One of my friends, Joan, actually majored in Pre-School Education. She got her degree from the University of Texas at Arlington. The world is smaller than we think, isn't it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Lily, the world really is a small place! It's fantastic that your friend Joan studied Pre-School Education at the University of Texas at Arlington. One of my dear friends, Jamie, studied the same at that very institution! It's possible they've crossed paths! Isn't that something?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nEric: Major: Physical Education School: University of Texas at Arlington \nDarrell: Major: Physical Education School: Valley City State University \nRuth: Major: Marine Engineering School: Texas A&M University-Kingsville \nJamie: Major: Pre-School Education School: University of Texas at Arlington \nMarjorie: Major: Multi Studies School: Pacific Western University \nEvelyn: Major: Pre-School Education School: Tennessee Technological University \nLoretta: Major: Biological Specializations School: University of Connecticut \nJames: Major: Marine Engineering School: Texas A&M University-Kingsville \nSandra: Major: Ministry & Church Administration School: University of Texas at Arlington\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello, Hendrick. It's lovely to meet you tonight. Such a beautiful setting, don't you agree? I couldn't help but overhearing earlier that you might have some connections in academia. It's just that I have quite a few friends working in various fields in different universities.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, Lily, the ambiance tonight is truly delightful. And yes, I do know a wide array of people from different academic backgrounds. Some have majored in areas like Physical Education, Marine Engineering, and even Pre-School Education. Coincidentally, quite a few of them attended the University of Texas at Arlington and Texas A&M University-Kingsville. Do you, by any chance, know anyone from these universities or majors?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Oh, really? That's quite interesting, Hendrick! One of my friends, Joan, actually majored in Pre-School Education. She got her degree from the University of Texas at Arlington. The world is smaller than we think, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Lily, the world really is a small place! It's fantastic that your friend Joan studied Pre-School Education at the University of Texas at Arlington. One of my dear friends, Jamie, studied the same at that very institution! It's possible they've crossed paths! Isn't that something?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"That's really something. It's quite possible that Joan and Jamie know each other. Joan always talks about how vibrant her cohort was. By the way, you mentioned knowing someone in Marine Engineering, right? Funnily enough, my friend Dennise majored in that at Wartburg College. Unusual major, isn't it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Marine Engineering is indeed a unique field of study, Lily. It happens that I know someone, James, who majored in Marine Engineering but at Texas A&M University-Kingsville, not Wartburg College. But since the world can be so incredibly connected, it wouldn't surprise me if they had at least some common connections in the field. Who knows?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nEric: Major: Physical Education School: University of Texas at Arlington \nDarrell: Major: Physical Education School: Valley City State University \nRuth: Major: Marine Engineering School: Texas A&M University-Kingsville \nJamie: Major: Pre-School Education School: University of Texas at Arlington \nMarjorie: Major: Multi Studies School: Pacific Western University \nEvelyn: Major: Pre-School Education School: Tennessee Technological University \nLoretta: Major: Biological Specializations School: University of Connecticut \nJames: Major: Marine Engineering School: Texas A&M University-Kingsville \nSandra: Major: Ministry & Church Administration School: University of Texas at Arlington\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello, Hendrick. It's lovely to meet you tonight. Such a beautiful setting, don't you agree? I couldn't help but overhearing earlier that you might have some connections in academia. It's just that I have quite a few friends working in various fields in different universities.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, Lily, the ambiance tonight is truly delightful. And yes, I do know a wide array of people from different academic backgrounds. Some have majored in areas like Physical Education, Marine Engineering, and even Pre-School Education. Coincidentally, quite a few of them attended the University of Texas at Arlington and Texas A&M University-Kingsville. Do you, by any chance, know anyone from these universities or majors?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Oh, really? That's quite interesting, Hendrick! One of my friends, Joan, actually majored in Pre-School Education. She got her degree from the University of Texas at Arlington. The world is smaller than we think, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Lily, the world really is a small place! It's fantastic that your friend Joan studied Pre-School Education at the University of Texas at Arlington. One of my dear friends, Jamie, studied the same at that very institution! It's possible they've crossed paths! Isn't that something?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"That's really something. It's quite possible that Joan and Jamie know each other. Joan always talks about how vibrant her cohort was. By the way, you mentioned knowing someone in Marine Engineering, right? Funnily enough, my friend Dennise majored in that at Wartburg College. Unusual major, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Marine Engineering is indeed a unique field of study, Lily. It happens that I know someone, James, who majored in Marine Engineering but at Texas A&M University-Kingsville, not Wartburg College. But since the world can be so incredibly connected, it wouldn't surprise me if they had at least some common connections in the field. Who knows?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"That's true, Hendrick, our academic circles can end up crossing paths in the most unexpected ways! Speaking of unique fields, I remember another friend of mine, August, who studied Biological Specializations, and he was quite passionate about his studies at the School of the Art Institute of Chicago. Not that commonly chosen of an institution for Biological Specializations, but they do say to each their own, right?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"It's amazing how our paths might have crossed in such varied academic fields, right Lily? Speaking of Biological Specializations, I know Loretta, who is quite enthusiastic about this field. However, she studied at the University of Connecticut rather than the School of the Art Institute of Chicago. It just goes to show the depth and diversity that each institution can offer in even the most unique fields. I'm sure August and Loretta would have a lot to talk about if they ever met!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nEric: Major: Physical Education School: University of Texas at Arlington \nDarrell: Major: Physical Education School: Valley City State University \nRuth: Major: Marine Engineering School: Texas A&M University-Kingsville \nJamie: Major: Pre-School Education School: University of Texas at Arlington \nMarjorie: Major: Multi Studies School: Pacific Western University \nEvelyn: Major: Pre-School Education School: Tennessee Technological University \nLoretta: Major: Biological Specializations School: University of Connecticut \nJames: Major: Marine Engineering School: Texas A&M University-Kingsville \nSandra: Major: Ministry & Church Administration School: University of Texas at Arlington\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello, Hendrick. It's lovely to meet you tonight. Such a beautiful setting, don't you agree? I couldn't help but overhearing earlier that you might have some connections in academia. It's just that I have quite a few friends working in various fields in different universities.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, Lily, the ambiance tonight is truly delightful. And yes, I do know a wide array of people from different academic backgrounds. Some have majored in areas like Physical Education, Marine Engineering, and even Pre-School Education. Coincidentally, quite a few of them attended the University of Texas at Arlington and Texas A&M University-Kingsville. Do you, by any chance, know anyone from these universities or majors?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Oh, really? That's quite interesting, Hendrick! One of my friends, Joan, actually majored in Pre-School Education. She got her degree from the University of Texas at Arlington. The world is smaller than we think, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Lily, the world really is a small place! It's fantastic that your friend Joan studied Pre-School Education at the University of Texas at Arlington. One of my dear friends, Jamie, studied the same at that very institution! It's possible they've crossed paths! Isn't that something?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"That's really something. It's quite possible that Joan and Jamie know each other. Joan always talks about how vibrant her cohort was. By the way, you mentioned knowing someone in Marine Engineering, right? Funnily enough, my friend Dennise majored in that at Wartburg College. Unusual major, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Marine Engineering is indeed a unique field of study, Lily. It happens that I know someone, James, who majored in Marine Engineering but at Texas A&M University-Kingsville, not Wartburg College. But since the world can be so incredibly connected, it wouldn't surprise me if they had at least some common connections in the field. Who knows?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"That's true, Hendrick, our academic circles can end up crossing paths in the most unexpected ways! Speaking of unique fields, I remember another friend of mine, August, who studied Biological Specializations, and he was quite passionate about his studies at the School of the Art Institute of Chicago. Not that commonly chosen of an institution for Biological Specializations, but they do say to each their own, right?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"It's amazing how our paths might have crossed in such varied academic fields, right Lily? Speaking of Biological Specializations, I know Loretta, who is quite enthusiastic about this field. However, she studied at the University of Connecticut rather than the School of the Art Institute of Chicago. It just goes to show the depth and diversity that each institution can offer in even the most unique fields. I'm sure August and Loretta would have a lot to talk about if they ever met!\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"That's right, Hendrick, I agree. The vast variety in academic fields is truly remarkable! By the way, talking about the University of Connecticut, one of my friends, Barbara, majored in Ministry & Church Administration from there. Having a friend involved in such a specific field is quite enlightening to me. Do you also know someone in that field or the same university, perhaps?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, the field of Ministry & Church Administration is intriguing, Lily. Though I don't personally know anyone who studied this major at the University of Connecticut, I am acquainted with Sandra who pursued the same field, but at our frequently mentioned University of Texas at Arlington. I guess we both know dynamic people from varied academic backgrounds. What an enlightening discussion this has been!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nEric: Major: Physical Education School: University of Texas at Arlington \nDarrell: Major: Physical Education School: Valley City State University \nRuth: Major: Marine Engineering School: Texas A&M University-Kingsville \nJamie: Major: Pre-School Education School: University of Texas at Arlington \nMarjorie: Major: Multi Studies School: Pacific Western University \nEvelyn: Major: Pre-School Education School: Tennessee Technological University \nLoretta: Major: Biological Specializations School: University of Connecticut \nJames: Major: Marine Engineering School: Texas A&M University-Kingsville \nSandra: Major: Ministry & Church Administration School: University of Texas at Arlington\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello, Hendrick. It's lovely to meet you tonight. Such a beautiful setting, don't you agree? I couldn't help but overhearing earlier that you might have some connections in academia. It's just that I have quite a few friends working in various fields in different universities.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, Lily, the ambiance tonight is truly delightful. And yes, I do know a wide array of people from different academic backgrounds. Some have majored in areas like Physical Education, Marine Engineering, and even Pre-School Education. Coincidentally, quite a few of them attended the University of Texas at Arlington and Texas A&M University-Kingsville. Do you, by any chance, know anyone from these universities or majors?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Oh, really? That's quite interesting, Hendrick! One of my friends, Joan, actually majored in Pre-School Education. She got her degree from the University of Texas at Arlington. The world is smaller than we think, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Lily, the world really is a small place! It's fantastic that your friend Joan studied Pre-School Education at the University of Texas at Arlington. One of my dear friends, Jamie, studied the same at that very institution! It's possible they've crossed paths! Isn't that something?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"That's really something. It's quite possible that Joan and Jamie know each other. Joan always talks about how vibrant her cohort was. By the way, you mentioned knowing someone in Marine Engineering, right? Funnily enough, my friend Dennise majored in that at Wartburg College. Unusual major, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Marine Engineering is indeed a unique field of study, Lily. It happens that I know someone, James, who majored in Marine Engineering but at Texas A&M University-Kingsville, not Wartburg College. But since the world can be so incredibly connected, it wouldn't surprise me if they had at least some common connections in the field. Who knows?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"That's true, Hendrick, our academic circles can end up crossing paths in the most unexpected ways! Speaking of unique fields, I remember another friend of mine, August, who studied Biological Specializations, and he was quite passionate about his studies at the School of the Art Institute of Chicago. Not that commonly chosen of an institution for Biological Specializations, but they do say to each their own, right?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"It's amazing how our paths might have crossed in such varied academic fields, right Lily? Speaking of Biological Specializations, I know Loretta, who is quite enthusiastic about this field. However, she studied at the University of Connecticut rather than the School of the Art Institute of Chicago. It just goes to show the depth and diversity that each institution can offer in even the most unique fields. I'm sure August and Loretta would have a lot to talk about if they ever met!\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"That's right, Hendrick, I agree. The vast variety in academic fields is truly remarkable! By the way, talking about the University of Connecticut, one of my friends, Barbara, majored in Ministry & Church Administration from there. Having a friend involved in such a specific field is quite enlightening to me. Do you also know someone in that field or the same university, perhaps?\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, the field of Ministry & Church Administration is intriguing, Lily. Though I don't personally know anyone who studied this major at the University of Connecticut, I am acquainted with Sandra who pursued the same field, but at our frequently mentioned University of Texas at Arlington. I guess we both know dynamic people from varied academic backgrounds. What an enlightening discussion this has been!\"\n\nTurn #10: Lily Greenberg said: \"I couldn't agree more, Hendrick. It's been such an interesting conversation, learning about our friends' varied academic backgrounds. We definitely do know some dynamic and diverse individuals. It's only a matter of time before our circles intersect even further. Either way, it was a pleasure to meet you and share these stories. Let's catch up soon!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'I concur wholeheartedly, Lily. Our friends indeed are as diverse and vibrant as the world itself. It has been a real pleasure getting to know you and see the world through our shared connections. Undoubtedly, we should catch up soon. Enjoy the rest of the evening!'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nEric: Major: Physical Education School: University of Texas at Arlington \nDarrell: Major: Physical Education School: Valley City State University \nRuth: Major: Marine Engineering School: Texas A&M University-Kingsville \nJamie: Major: Pre-School Education School: University of Texas at Arlington \nMarjorie: Major: Multi Studies School: Pacific Western University \nEvelyn: Major: Pre-School Education School: Tennessee Technological University \nLoretta: Major: Biological Specializations School: University of Connecticut \nJames: Major: Marine Engineering School: Texas A&M University-Kingsville \nSandra: Major: Ministry & Church Administration School: University of Texas at Arlington\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello, Hendrick. It's lovely to meet you tonight. Such a beautiful setting, don't you agree? I couldn't help but overhearing earlier that you might have some connections in academia. It's just that I have quite a few friends working in various fields in different universities.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, Lily, the ambiance tonight is truly delightful. And yes, I do know a wide array of people from different academic backgrounds. Some have majored in areas like Physical Education, Marine Engineering, and even Pre-School Education. Coincidentally, quite a few of them attended the University of Texas at Arlington and Texas A&M University-Kingsville. Do you, by any chance, know anyone from these universities or majors?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Oh, really? That's quite interesting, Hendrick! One of my friends, Joan, actually majored in Pre-School Education. She got her degree from the University of Texas at Arlington. The world is smaller than we think, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Lily, the world really is a small place! It's fantastic that your friend Joan studied Pre-School Education at the University of Texas at Arlington. One of my dear friends, Jamie, studied the same at that very institution! It's possible they've crossed paths! Isn't that something?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"That's really something. It's quite possible that Joan and Jamie know each other. Joan always talks about how vibrant her cohort was. By the way, you mentioned knowing someone in Marine Engineering, right? Funnily enough, my friend Dennise majored in that at Wartburg College. Unusual major, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Marine Engineering is indeed a unique field of study, Lily. It happens that I know someone, James, who majored in Marine Engineering but at Texas A&M University-Kingsville, not Wartburg College. But since the world can be so incredibly connected, it wouldn't surprise me if they had at least some common connections in the field. Who knows?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"That's true, Hendrick, our academic circles can end up crossing paths in the most unexpected ways! Speaking of unique fields, I remember another friend of mine, August, who studied Biological Specializations, and he was quite passionate about his studies at the School of the Art Institute of Chicago. Not that commonly chosen of an institution for Biological Specializations, but they do say to each their own, right?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"It's amazing how our paths might have crossed in such varied academic fields, right Lily? Speaking of Biological Specializations, I know Loretta, who is quite enthusiastic about this field. However, she studied at the University of Connecticut rather than the School of the Art Institute of Chicago. It just goes to show the depth and diversity that each institution can offer in even the most unique fields. I'm sure August and Loretta would have a lot to talk about if they ever met!\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"That's right, Hendrick, I agree. The vast variety in academic fields is truly remarkable! By the way, talking about the University of Connecticut, one of my friends, Barbara, majored in Ministry & Church Administration from there. Having a friend involved in such a specific field is quite enlightening to me. Do you also know someone in that field or the same university, perhaps?\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, the field of Ministry & Church Administration is intriguing, Lily. Though I don't personally know anyone who studied this major at the University of Connecticut, I am acquainted with Sandra who pursued the same field, but at our frequently mentioned University of Texas at Arlington. I guess we both know dynamic people from varied academic backgrounds. What an enlightening discussion this has been!\"\n\nTurn #10: Lily Greenberg said: \"I couldn't agree more, Hendrick. It's been such an interesting conversation, learning about our friends' varied academic backgrounds. We definitely do know some dynamic and diverse individuals. It's only a matter of time before our circles intersect even further. Either way, it was a pleasure to meet you and share these stories. Let's catch up soon!\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I concur wholeheartedly, Lily. Our friends indeed are as diverse and vibrant as the world itself. It has been a real pleasure getting to know you and see the world through our shared connections. Undoubtedly, we should catch up soon. Enjoy the rest of the evening!\"\n\nTurn #12: Lily Greenberg left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Benjamin Jackson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nBenjamin Jackson's background: \nDonovan Reeves's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nAugust: School: Saint Vincent College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nJohn: School: University of Rhode Island Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nRebecca: School: State University of New York at Albany Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nNeoma: School: Hofstra University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nRonnie: School: National Technological University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nSuzette: School: Utah Valley State College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPenelope: School: Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nFernando: School: St. John's College-Santa Fe Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nVelda: School: Rhode Island College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \n\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey there, I'm Donovan. What brings you here to this gathering?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Benjamin Jackson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nBenjamin Jackson's background: \nDonovan Reeves's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nAugust: School: Saint Vincent College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nJohn: School: University of Rhode Island Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nRebecca: School: State University of New York at Albany Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nNeoma: School: Hofstra University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nRonnie: School: National Technological University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nSuzette: School: Utah Valley State College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPenelope: School: Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nFernando: School: St. John's College-Santa Fe Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nVelda: School: Rhode Island College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \n\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey there, I'm Donovan. What brings you here to this gathering?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hello Donovan, I'm Benjamin. I'm here because I believe in the power of conversations in impacting change, especially about environmental issues. So do you often attend such gatherings? Do you have a school or college affiliation perhaps that got you interested in these events?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Environmental changes are indeed significant in the present day. I graduated from National Technological University and, in my spare time, I often participate in coding competitions as well. I personally believe that tapping into our alumni relations can also prove beneficial for such issues. By the way, are you affiliated with any college or institutions perhaps?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Benjamin Jackson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nBenjamin Jackson's background: \nDonovan Reeves's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nAugust: School: Saint Vincent College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nJohn: School: University of Rhode Island Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nRebecca: School: State University of New York at Albany Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nNeoma: School: Hofstra University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nRonnie: School: National Technological University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nSuzette: School: Utah Valley State College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPenelope: School: Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nFernando: School: St. John's College-Santa Fe Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nVelda: School: Rhode Island College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \n\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey there, I'm Donovan. What brings you here to this gathering?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hello Donovan, I'm Benjamin. I'm here because I believe in the power of conversations in impacting change, especially about environmental issues. So do you often attend such gatherings? Do you have a school or college affiliation perhaps that got you interested in these events?\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"Environmental changes are indeed significant in the present day. I graduated from National Technological University and, in my spare time, I often participate in coding competitions as well. I personally believe that tapping into our alumni relations can also prove beneficial for such issues. By the way, are you affiliated with any college or institutions perhaps?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's great to hear, Donovan! National Technological University has a very distinguished reputation. I studied at Saint Vincent College, which has a different focus I suppose, but equally dedicated to nurturing development. I'm particularly curious, considering your technology-exposure, if you're indoor or outdoor oriented in your free time?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ah, Saint Vincent College! I do have a friend who also graduated from there - his name's August. Small world, isn't it? As a software developer, I'm usually indoors coding away on computers, but I do appreciate the outdoors whenever I get a chance. You seem to have an interest in people\u2019s personal time preferences, are you by any chance, more inclined to evening events, like my friend August from Saint Vincent?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Benjamin Jackson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nBenjamin Jackson's background: \nDonovan Reeves's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nAugust: School: Saint Vincent College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nJohn: School: University of Rhode Island Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nRebecca: School: State University of New York at Albany Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nNeoma: School: Hofstra University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nRonnie: School: National Technological University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nSuzette: School: Utah Valley State College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPenelope: School: Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nFernando: School: St. John's College-Santa Fe Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nVelda: School: Rhode Island College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \n\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey there, I'm Donovan. What brings you here to this gathering?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hello Donovan, I'm Benjamin. I'm here because I believe in the power of conversations in impacting change, especially about environmental issues. So do you often attend such gatherings? Do you have a school or college affiliation perhaps that got you interested in these events?\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"Environmental changes are indeed significant in the present day. I graduated from National Technological University and, in my spare time, I often participate in coding competitions as well. I personally believe that tapping into our alumni relations can also prove beneficial for such issues. By the way, are you affiliated with any college or institutions perhaps?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's great to hear, Donovan! National Technological University has a very distinguished reputation. I studied at Saint Vincent College, which has a different focus I suppose, but equally dedicated to nurturing development. I'm particularly curious, considering your technology-exposure, if you're indoor or outdoor oriented in your free time?\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"Ah, Saint Vincent College! I do have a friend who also graduated from there - his name's August. Small world, isn't it? As a software developer, I'm usually indoors coding away on computers, but I do appreciate the outdoors whenever I get a chance. You seem to have an interest in people\u2019s personal time preferences, are you by any chance, more inclined to evening events, like my friend August from Saint Vincent?\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Well, it's great that we share some Saint Vincent College connection, Donovan! Indeed, I do prefer evening events, there's a unique charm about them. Speaking about preferences, do you like indoor or outdoor gatherings more, Donovan? Also, your friend named August, does he prefer indoor events like you or is he inclined more towards the outdoors?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Seems like we share a preference for evening events, Benjamin. As for your question on August, he has always been an indoor type. We've spent countless evenings together on indoor events, just like we are doing here. May I ask, do you have any such evening, indoor buddies from Saint Vincent?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Benjamin Jackson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nBenjamin Jackson's background: \nDonovan Reeves's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nAugust: School: Saint Vincent College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nJohn: School: University of Rhode Island Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nRebecca: School: State University of New York at Albany Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nNeoma: School: Hofstra University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nRonnie: School: National Technological University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nSuzette: School: Utah Valley State College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPenelope: School: Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nFernando: School: St. John's College-Santa Fe Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nVelda: School: Rhode Island College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \n\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey there, I'm Donovan. What brings you here to this gathering?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hello Donovan, I'm Benjamin. I'm here because I believe in the power of conversations in impacting change, especially about environmental issues. So do you often attend such gatherings? Do you have a school or college affiliation perhaps that got you interested in these events?\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"Environmental changes are indeed significant in the present day. I graduated from National Technological University and, in my spare time, I often participate in coding competitions as well. I personally believe that tapping into our alumni relations can also prove beneficial for such issues. By the way, are you affiliated with any college or institutions perhaps?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's great to hear, Donovan! National Technological University has a very distinguished reputation. I studied at Saint Vincent College, which has a different focus I suppose, but equally dedicated to nurturing development. I'm particularly curious, considering your technology-exposure, if you're indoor or outdoor oriented in your free time?\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"Ah, Saint Vincent College! I do have a friend who also graduated from there - his name's August. Small world, isn't it? As a software developer, I'm usually indoors coding away on computers, but I do appreciate the outdoors whenever I get a chance. You seem to have an interest in people\u2019s personal time preferences, are you by any chance, more inclined to evening events, like my friend August from Saint Vincent?\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Well, it's great that we share some Saint Vincent College connection, Donovan! Indeed, I do prefer evening events, there's a unique charm about them. Speaking about preferences, do you like indoor or outdoor gatherings more, Donovan? Also, your friend named August, does he prefer indoor events like you or is he inclined more towards the outdoors?\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"Seems like we share a preference for evening events, Benjamin. As for your question on August, he has always been an indoor type. We've spent countless evenings together on indoor events, just like we are doing here. May I ask, do you have any such evening, indoor buddies from Saint Vincent?\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Donovan. There's something about evening indoor events that just hits differently, doesn't it? Regarding friends from Saint Vincent, I recall an enchanting lady named Tiffany, we attended numerous indoor, evening events together. I'm wondering if she knows your friend August from the same alma mater? They must have crossed paths in several events similar to this one.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Yes, Benjamin, you're quite right. Evening indoor events do have a unique charm to them. As for Tiffany, I'm not sure if August knows her, but considering the close-knit community at Saint Vincent, I wouldn't be surprised if their paths have crossed. Is there anyone else from Saint Vincent you remember who might know August?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Benjamin Jackson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nBenjamin Jackson's background: \nDonovan Reeves's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nAugust: School: Saint Vincent College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nJohn: School: University of Rhode Island Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nRebecca: School: State University of New York at Albany Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nNeoma: School: Hofstra University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nRonnie: School: National Technological University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nSuzette: School: Utah Valley State College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPenelope: School: Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nFernando: School: St. John's College-Santa Fe Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nVelda: School: Rhode Island College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \n\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey there, I'm Donovan. What brings you here to this gathering?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hello Donovan, I'm Benjamin. I'm here because I believe in the power of conversations in impacting change, especially about environmental issues. So do you often attend such gatherings? Do you have a school or college affiliation perhaps that got you interested in these events?\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"Environmental changes are indeed significant in the present day. I graduated from National Technological University and, in my spare time, I often participate in coding competitions as well. I personally believe that tapping into our alumni relations can also prove beneficial for such issues. By the way, are you affiliated with any college or institutions perhaps?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's great to hear, Donovan! National Technological University has a very distinguished reputation. I studied at Saint Vincent College, which has a different focus I suppose, but equally dedicated to nurturing development. I'm particularly curious, considering your technology-exposure, if you're indoor or outdoor oriented in your free time?\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"Ah, Saint Vincent College! I do have a friend who also graduated from there - his name's August. Small world, isn't it? As a software developer, I'm usually indoors coding away on computers, but I do appreciate the outdoors whenever I get a chance. You seem to have an interest in people\u2019s personal time preferences, are you by any chance, more inclined to evening events, like my friend August from Saint Vincent?\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Well, it's great that we share some Saint Vincent College connection, Donovan! Indeed, I do prefer evening events, there's a unique charm about them. Speaking about preferences, do you like indoor or outdoor gatherings more, Donovan? Also, your friend named August, does he prefer indoor events like you or is he inclined more towards the outdoors?\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"Seems like we share a preference for evening events, Benjamin. As for your question on August, he has always been an indoor type. We've spent countless evenings together on indoor events, just like we are doing here. May I ask, do you have any such evening, indoor buddies from Saint Vincent?\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Donovan. There's something about evening indoor events that just hits differently, doesn't it? Regarding friends from Saint Vincent, I recall an enchanting lady named Tiffany, we attended numerous indoor, evening events together. I'm wondering if she knows your friend August from the same alma mater? They must have crossed paths in several events similar to this one.\"\n\nTurn #8: Donovan Reeves said: \"Yes, Benjamin, you're quite right. Evening indoor events do have a unique charm to them. As for Tiffany, I'm not sure if August knows her, but considering the close-knit community at Saint Vincent, I wouldn't be surprised if their paths have crossed. Is there anyone else from Saint Vincent you remember who might know August?\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Oh, surely. Besides Tiffany, there's this lively individual named Neoma who I remember being quite the regular at nighttime indoor gatherings. Highly likely that she may know your friend August, considering how they share similar interests. Funny how interconnected our world can be, isn't it, Donovan?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ah, Neoma! Yes, she and I have been friends for a long time! We bonded over our shared love for coding and have been close ever since. The interconnectedness of our world indeed holds many surprises. It's great realizing our paths aren't so far apart after all, Benjamin.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Benjamin Jackson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nBenjamin Jackson's background: \nDonovan Reeves's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nAugust: School: Saint Vincent College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nJohn: School: University of Rhode Island Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nRebecca: School: State University of New York at Albany Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nNeoma: School: Hofstra University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nRonnie: School: National Technological University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nSuzette: School: Utah Valley State College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPenelope: School: Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nFernando: School: St. John's College-Santa Fe Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nVelda: School: Rhode Island College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \n\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey there, I'm Donovan. What brings you here to this gathering?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hello Donovan, I'm Benjamin. I'm here because I believe in the power of conversations in impacting change, especially about environmental issues. So do you often attend such gatherings? Do you have a school or college affiliation perhaps that got you interested in these events?\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"Environmental changes are indeed significant in the present day. I graduated from National Technological University and, in my spare time, I often participate in coding competitions as well. I personally believe that tapping into our alumni relations can also prove beneficial for such issues. By the way, are you affiliated with any college or institutions perhaps?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's great to hear, Donovan! National Technological University has a very distinguished reputation. I studied at Saint Vincent College, which has a different focus I suppose, but equally dedicated to nurturing development. I'm particularly curious, considering your technology-exposure, if you're indoor or outdoor oriented in your free time?\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"Ah, Saint Vincent College! I do have a friend who also graduated from there - his name's August. Small world, isn't it? As a software developer, I'm usually indoors coding away on computers, but I do appreciate the outdoors whenever I get a chance. You seem to have an interest in people\u2019s personal time preferences, are you by any chance, more inclined to evening events, like my friend August from Saint Vincent?\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Well, it's great that we share some Saint Vincent College connection, Donovan! Indeed, I do prefer evening events, there's a unique charm about them. Speaking about preferences, do you like indoor or outdoor gatherings more, Donovan? Also, your friend named August, does he prefer indoor events like you or is he inclined more towards the outdoors?\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"Seems like we share a preference for evening events, Benjamin. As for your question on August, he has always been an indoor type. We've spent countless evenings together on indoor events, just like we are doing here. May I ask, do you have any such evening, indoor buddies from Saint Vincent?\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Donovan. There's something about evening indoor events that just hits differently, doesn't it? Regarding friends from Saint Vincent, I recall an enchanting lady named Tiffany, we attended numerous indoor, evening events together. I'm wondering if she knows your friend August from the same alma mater? They must have crossed paths in several events similar to this one.\"\n\nTurn #8: Donovan Reeves said: \"Yes, Benjamin, you're quite right. Evening indoor events do have a unique charm to them. As for Tiffany, I'm not sure if August knows her, but considering the close-knit community at Saint Vincent, I wouldn't be surprised if their paths have crossed. Is there anyone else from Saint Vincent you remember who might know August?\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Oh, surely. Besides Tiffany, there's this lively individual named Neoma who I remember being quite the regular at nighttime indoor gatherings. Highly likely that she may know your friend August, considering how they share similar interests. Funny how interconnected our world can be, isn't it, Donovan?\"\n\nTurn #10: Donovan Reeves said: \"Ah, Neoma! Yes, she and I have been friends for a long time! We bonded over our shared love for coding and have been close ever since. The interconnectedness of our world indeed holds many surprises. It's great realizing our paths aren't so far apart after all, Benjamin.\"\n\nTurn #11: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's fantastic, Donovan! It's really amazing how interconnected our lives are. Neoma is not just an energetic person, but a good friend too. It's a pleasure discovering these commonalities with you. Our world truly exemplifies 'six degrees of separation,' wouldn't you say?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Benjamin! The concept of 'six degrees of separation' seems all the more real in our conversation tonight. It was great getting to know you and realizing our shared connections. I'm sure we'll probably bump into each other at future gatherings if not through August or Neoma. Let's keep in touch, shall we?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Benjamin Jackson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nBenjamin Jackson's background: \nDonovan Reeves's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nAugust: School: Saint Vincent College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nJohn: School: University of Rhode Island Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nRebecca: School: State University of New York at Albany Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nNeoma: School: Hofstra University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nRonnie: School: National Technological University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nSuzette: School: Utah Valley State College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPenelope: School: Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nFernando: School: St. John's College-Santa Fe Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nVelda: School: Rhode Island College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \n\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey there, I'm Donovan. What brings you here to this gathering?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hello Donovan, I'm Benjamin. I'm here because I believe in the power of conversations in impacting change, especially about environmental issues. So do you often attend such gatherings? Do you have a school or college affiliation perhaps that got you interested in these events?\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"Environmental changes are indeed significant in the present day. I graduated from National Technological University and, in my spare time, I often participate in coding competitions as well. I personally believe that tapping into our alumni relations can also prove beneficial for such issues. By the way, are you affiliated with any college or institutions perhaps?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's great to hear, Donovan! National Technological University has a very distinguished reputation. I studied at Saint Vincent College, which has a different focus I suppose, but equally dedicated to nurturing development. I'm particularly curious, considering your technology-exposure, if you're indoor or outdoor oriented in your free time?\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"Ah, Saint Vincent College! I do have a friend who also graduated from there - his name's August. Small world, isn't it? As a software developer, I'm usually indoors coding away on computers, but I do appreciate the outdoors whenever I get a chance. You seem to have an interest in people\u2019s personal time preferences, are you by any chance, more inclined to evening events, like my friend August from Saint Vincent?\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Well, it's great that we share some Saint Vincent College connection, Donovan! Indeed, I do prefer evening events, there's a unique charm about them. Speaking about preferences, do you like indoor or outdoor gatherings more, Donovan? Also, your friend named August, does he prefer indoor events like you or is he inclined more towards the outdoors?\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"Seems like we share a preference for evening events, Benjamin. As for your question on August, he has always been an indoor type. We've spent countless evenings together on indoor events, just like we are doing here. May I ask, do you have any such evening, indoor buddies from Saint Vincent?\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Donovan. There's something about evening indoor events that just hits differently, doesn't it? Regarding friends from Saint Vincent, I recall an enchanting lady named Tiffany, we attended numerous indoor, evening events together. I'm wondering if she knows your friend August from the same alma mater? They must have crossed paths in several events similar to this one.\"\n\nTurn #8: Donovan Reeves said: \"Yes, Benjamin, you're quite right. Evening indoor events do have a unique charm to them. As for Tiffany, I'm not sure if August knows her, but considering the close-knit community at Saint Vincent, I wouldn't be surprised if their paths have crossed. Is there anyone else from Saint Vincent you remember who might know August?\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Oh, surely. Besides Tiffany, there's this lively individual named Neoma who I remember being quite the regular at nighttime indoor gatherings. Highly likely that she may know your friend August, considering how they share similar interests. Funny how interconnected our world can be, isn't it, Donovan?\"\n\nTurn #10: Donovan Reeves said: \"Ah, Neoma! Yes, she and I have been friends for a long time! We bonded over our shared love for coding and have been close ever since. The interconnectedness of our world indeed holds many surprises. It's great realizing our paths aren't so far apart after all, Benjamin.\"\n\nTurn #11: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's fantastic, Donovan! It's really amazing how interconnected our lives are. Neoma is not just an energetic person, but a good friend too. It's a pleasure discovering these commonalities with you. Our world truly exemplifies 'six degrees of separation,' wouldn't you say?\"\n\nTurn #12: Donovan Reeves said: \"Absolutely, Benjamin! The concept of 'six degrees of separation' seems all the more real in our conversation tonight. It was great getting to know you and realizing our shared connections. I'm sure we'll probably bump into each other at future gatherings if not through August or Neoma. Let's keep in touch, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #13: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Certainly, Donovan! This conversation indeed reiterated how remarkably interconnected we are. I look forward to crossing paths with you again in one of our future gatherings, possibly through August or Neoma. Here's to more enlightening exchanges!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Benjamin Jackson\nDonovan Reeves's background: \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nTiffany: School: Saint Vincent College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nLucille: School: Southampton College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nJames: School: University of Wisconsin-River Falls Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nQuinn: School: Antioch University-Los Angeles Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nAlyssa: School: Davidson College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nBetty: School: St. John's College-Santa Fe Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nNeoma: School: Hofstra University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nWilliam: School: State University of New York at Albany Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nVictoria: School: Montana Tech Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey there, I'm Donovan. What brings you here to this gathering?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hello Donovan, I'm Benjamin. I'm here because I believe in the power of conversations in impacting change, especially about environmental issues. So do you often attend such gatherings? Do you have a school or college affiliation perhaps that got you interested in these events?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Benjamin Jackson\nDonovan Reeves's background: \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nTiffany: School: Saint Vincent College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nLucille: School: Southampton College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nJames: School: University of Wisconsin-River Falls Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nQuinn: School: Antioch University-Los Angeles Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nAlyssa: School: Davidson College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nBetty: School: St. John's College-Santa Fe Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nNeoma: School: Hofstra University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nWilliam: School: State University of New York at Albany Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nVictoria: School: Montana Tech Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey there, I'm Donovan. What brings you here to this gathering?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hello Donovan, I'm Benjamin. I'm here because I believe in the power of conversations in impacting change, especially about environmental issues. So do you often attend such gatherings? Do you have a school or college affiliation perhaps that got you interested in these events?\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"Environmental changes are indeed significant in the present day. I graduated from National Technological University and, in my spare time, I often participate in coding competitions as well. I personally believe that tapping into our alumni relations can also prove beneficial for such issues. By the way, are you affiliated with any college or institutions perhaps?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's great to hear, Donovan! National Technological University has a very distinguished reputation. I studied at Saint Vincent College, which has a different focus I suppose, but equally dedicated to nurturing development. I'm particularly curious, considering your technology-exposure, if you're indoor or outdoor oriented in your free time?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Benjamin Jackson\nDonovan Reeves's background: \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nTiffany: School: Saint Vincent College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nLucille: School: Southampton College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nJames: School: University of Wisconsin-River Falls Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nQuinn: School: Antioch University-Los Angeles Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nAlyssa: School: Davidson College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nBetty: School: St. John's College-Santa Fe Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nNeoma: School: Hofstra University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nWilliam: School: State University of New York at Albany Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nVictoria: School: Montana Tech Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey there, I'm Donovan. What brings you here to this gathering?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hello Donovan, I'm Benjamin. I'm here because I believe in the power of conversations in impacting change, especially about environmental issues. So do you often attend such gatherings? Do you have a school or college affiliation perhaps that got you interested in these events?\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"Environmental changes are indeed significant in the present day. I graduated from National Technological University and, in my spare time, I often participate in coding competitions as well. I personally believe that tapping into our alumni relations can also prove beneficial for such issues. By the way, are you affiliated with any college or institutions perhaps?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's great to hear, Donovan! National Technological University has a very distinguished reputation. I studied at Saint Vincent College, which has a different focus I suppose, but equally dedicated to nurturing development. I'm particularly curious, considering your technology-exposure, if you're indoor or outdoor oriented in your free time?\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"Ah, Saint Vincent College! I do have a friend who also graduated from there - his name's August. Small world, isn't it? As a software developer, I'm usually indoors coding away on computers, but I do appreciate the outdoors whenever I get a chance. You seem to have an interest in people\u2019s personal time preferences, are you by any chance, more inclined to evening events, like my friend August from Saint Vincent?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Well, it's great that we share some Saint Vincent College connection, Donovan! Indeed, I do prefer evening events, there's a unique charm about them. Speaking about preferences, do you like indoor or outdoor gatherings more, Donovan? Also, your friend named August, does he prefer indoor events like you or is he inclined more towards the outdoors?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Benjamin Jackson\nDonovan Reeves's background: \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nTiffany: School: Saint Vincent College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nLucille: School: Southampton College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nJames: School: University of Wisconsin-River Falls Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nQuinn: School: Antioch University-Los Angeles Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nAlyssa: School: Davidson College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nBetty: School: St. John's College-Santa Fe Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nNeoma: School: Hofstra University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nWilliam: School: State University of New York at Albany Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nVictoria: School: Montana Tech Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey there, I'm Donovan. What brings you here to this gathering?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hello Donovan, I'm Benjamin. I'm here because I believe in the power of conversations in impacting change, especially about environmental issues. So do you often attend such gatherings? Do you have a school or college affiliation perhaps that got you interested in these events?\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"Environmental changes are indeed significant in the present day. I graduated from National Technological University and, in my spare time, I often participate in coding competitions as well. I personally believe that tapping into our alumni relations can also prove beneficial for such issues. By the way, are you affiliated with any college or institutions perhaps?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's great to hear, Donovan! National Technological University has a very distinguished reputation. I studied at Saint Vincent College, which has a different focus I suppose, but equally dedicated to nurturing development. I'm particularly curious, considering your technology-exposure, if you're indoor or outdoor oriented in your free time?\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"Ah, Saint Vincent College! I do have a friend who also graduated from there - his name's August. Small world, isn't it? As a software developer, I'm usually indoors coding away on computers, but I do appreciate the outdoors whenever I get a chance. You seem to have an interest in people\u2019s personal time preferences, are you by any chance, more inclined to evening events, like my friend August from Saint Vincent?\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Well, it's great that we share some Saint Vincent College connection, Donovan! Indeed, I do prefer evening events, there's a unique charm about them. Speaking about preferences, do you like indoor or outdoor gatherings more, Donovan? Also, your friend named August, does he prefer indoor events like you or is he inclined more towards the outdoors?\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"Seems like we share a preference for evening events, Benjamin. As for your question on August, he has always been an indoor type. We've spent countless evenings together on indoor events, just like we are doing here. May I ask, do you have any such evening, indoor buddies from Saint Vincent?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Donovan. There's something about evening indoor events that just hits differently, doesn't it? Regarding friends from Saint Vincent, I recall an enchanting lady named Tiffany, we attended numerous indoor, evening events together. I'm wondering if she knows your friend August from the same alma mater? They must have crossed paths in several events similar to this one.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Benjamin Jackson\nDonovan Reeves's background: \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nTiffany: School: Saint Vincent College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nLucille: School: Southampton College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nJames: School: University of Wisconsin-River Falls Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nQuinn: School: Antioch University-Los Angeles Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nAlyssa: School: Davidson College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nBetty: School: St. John's College-Santa Fe Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nNeoma: School: Hofstra University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nWilliam: School: State University of New York at Albany Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nVictoria: School: Montana Tech Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey there, I'm Donovan. What brings you here to this gathering?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hello Donovan, I'm Benjamin. I'm here because I believe in the power of conversations in impacting change, especially about environmental issues. So do you often attend such gatherings? Do you have a school or college affiliation perhaps that got you interested in these events?\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"Environmental changes are indeed significant in the present day. I graduated from National Technological University and, in my spare time, I often participate in coding competitions as well. I personally believe that tapping into our alumni relations can also prove beneficial for such issues. By the way, are you affiliated with any college or institutions perhaps?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's great to hear, Donovan! National Technological University has a very distinguished reputation. I studied at Saint Vincent College, which has a different focus I suppose, but equally dedicated to nurturing development. I'm particularly curious, considering your technology-exposure, if you're indoor or outdoor oriented in your free time?\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"Ah, Saint Vincent College! I do have a friend who also graduated from there - his name's August. Small world, isn't it? As a software developer, I'm usually indoors coding away on computers, but I do appreciate the outdoors whenever I get a chance. You seem to have an interest in people\u2019s personal time preferences, are you by any chance, more inclined to evening events, like my friend August from Saint Vincent?\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Well, it's great that we share some Saint Vincent College connection, Donovan! Indeed, I do prefer evening events, there's a unique charm about them. Speaking about preferences, do you like indoor or outdoor gatherings more, Donovan? Also, your friend named August, does he prefer indoor events like you or is he inclined more towards the outdoors?\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"Seems like we share a preference for evening events, Benjamin. As for your question on August, he has always been an indoor type. We've spent countless evenings together on indoor events, just like we are doing here. May I ask, do you have any such evening, indoor buddies from Saint Vincent?\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Donovan. There's something about evening indoor events that just hits differently, doesn't it? Regarding friends from Saint Vincent, I recall an enchanting lady named Tiffany, we attended numerous indoor, evening events together. I'm wondering if she knows your friend August from the same alma mater? They must have crossed paths in several events similar to this one.\"\n\nTurn #8: Donovan Reeves said: \"Yes, Benjamin, you're quite right. Evening indoor events do have a unique charm to them. As for Tiffany, I'm not sure if August knows her, but considering the close-knit community at Saint Vincent, I wouldn't be surprised if their paths have crossed. Is there anyone else from Saint Vincent you remember who might know August?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oh, surely. Besides Tiffany, there's this lively individual named Neoma who I remember being quite the regular at nighttime indoor gatherings. Highly likely that she may know your friend August, considering how they share similar interests. Funny how interconnected our world can be, isn't it, Donovan?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Benjamin Jackson\nDonovan Reeves's background: \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nTiffany: School: Saint Vincent College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nLucille: School: Southampton College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nJames: School: University of Wisconsin-River Falls Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nQuinn: School: Antioch University-Los Angeles Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nAlyssa: School: Davidson College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nBetty: School: St. John's College-Santa Fe Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nNeoma: School: Hofstra University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nWilliam: School: State University of New York at Albany Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nVictoria: School: Montana Tech Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey there, I'm Donovan. What brings you here to this gathering?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hello Donovan, I'm Benjamin. I'm here because I believe in the power of conversations in impacting change, especially about environmental issues. So do you often attend such gatherings? Do you have a school or college affiliation perhaps that got you interested in these events?\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"Environmental changes are indeed significant in the present day. I graduated from National Technological University and, in my spare time, I often participate in coding competitions as well. I personally believe that tapping into our alumni relations can also prove beneficial for such issues. By the way, are you affiliated with any college or institutions perhaps?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's great to hear, Donovan! National Technological University has a very distinguished reputation. I studied at Saint Vincent College, which has a different focus I suppose, but equally dedicated to nurturing development. I'm particularly curious, considering your technology-exposure, if you're indoor or outdoor oriented in your free time?\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"Ah, Saint Vincent College! I do have a friend who also graduated from there - his name's August. Small world, isn't it? As a software developer, I'm usually indoors coding away on computers, but I do appreciate the outdoors whenever I get a chance. You seem to have an interest in people\u2019s personal time preferences, are you by any chance, more inclined to evening events, like my friend August from Saint Vincent?\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Well, it's great that we share some Saint Vincent College connection, Donovan! Indeed, I do prefer evening events, there's a unique charm about them. Speaking about preferences, do you like indoor or outdoor gatherings more, Donovan? Also, your friend named August, does he prefer indoor events like you or is he inclined more towards the outdoors?\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"Seems like we share a preference for evening events, Benjamin. As for your question on August, he has always been an indoor type. We've spent countless evenings together on indoor events, just like we are doing here. May I ask, do you have any such evening, indoor buddies from Saint Vincent?\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Donovan. There's something about evening indoor events that just hits differently, doesn't it? Regarding friends from Saint Vincent, I recall an enchanting lady named Tiffany, we attended numerous indoor, evening events together. I'm wondering if she knows your friend August from the same alma mater? They must have crossed paths in several events similar to this one.\"\n\nTurn #8: Donovan Reeves said: \"Yes, Benjamin, you're quite right. Evening indoor events do have a unique charm to them. As for Tiffany, I'm not sure if August knows her, but considering the close-knit community at Saint Vincent, I wouldn't be surprised if their paths have crossed. Is there anyone else from Saint Vincent you remember who might know August?\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Oh, surely. Besides Tiffany, there's this lively individual named Neoma who I remember being quite the regular at nighttime indoor gatherings. Highly likely that she may know your friend August, considering how they share similar interests. Funny how interconnected our world can be, isn't it, Donovan?\"\n\nTurn #10: Donovan Reeves said: \"Ah, Neoma! Yes, she and I have been friends for a long time! We bonded over our shared love for coding and have been close ever since. The interconnectedness of our world indeed holds many surprises. It's great realizing our paths aren't so far apart after all, Benjamin.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's fantastic, Donovan! It's really amazing how interconnected our lives are. Neoma is not just an energetic person, but a good friend too. It's a pleasure discovering these commonalities with you. Our world truly exemplifies 'six degrees of separation,' wouldn't you say?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Benjamin Jackson\nDonovan Reeves's background: \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nTiffany: School: Saint Vincent College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nLucille: School: Southampton College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nJames: School: University of Wisconsin-River Falls Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nQuinn: School: Antioch University-Los Angeles Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nAlyssa: School: Davidson College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nBetty: School: St. John's College-Santa Fe Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nNeoma: School: Hofstra University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nWilliam: School: State University of New York at Albany Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nVictoria: School: Montana Tech Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey there, I'm Donovan. What brings you here to this gathering?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hello Donovan, I'm Benjamin. I'm here because I believe in the power of conversations in impacting change, especially about environmental issues. So do you often attend such gatherings? Do you have a school or college affiliation perhaps that got you interested in these events?\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"Environmental changes are indeed significant in the present day. I graduated from National Technological University and, in my spare time, I often participate in coding competitions as well. I personally believe that tapping into our alumni relations can also prove beneficial for such issues. By the way, are you affiliated with any college or institutions perhaps?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's great to hear, Donovan! National Technological University has a very distinguished reputation. I studied at Saint Vincent College, which has a different focus I suppose, but equally dedicated to nurturing development. I'm particularly curious, considering your technology-exposure, if you're indoor or outdoor oriented in your free time?\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"Ah, Saint Vincent College! I do have a friend who also graduated from there - his name's August. Small world, isn't it? As a software developer, I'm usually indoors coding away on computers, but I do appreciate the outdoors whenever I get a chance. You seem to have an interest in people\u2019s personal time preferences, are you by any chance, more inclined to evening events, like my friend August from Saint Vincent?\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Well, it's great that we share some Saint Vincent College connection, Donovan! Indeed, I do prefer evening events, there's a unique charm about them. Speaking about preferences, do you like indoor or outdoor gatherings more, Donovan? Also, your friend named August, does he prefer indoor events like you or is he inclined more towards the outdoors?\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"Seems like we share a preference for evening events, Benjamin. As for your question on August, he has always been an indoor type. We've spent countless evenings together on indoor events, just like we are doing here. May I ask, do you have any such evening, indoor buddies from Saint Vincent?\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Donovan. There's something about evening indoor events that just hits differently, doesn't it? Regarding friends from Saint Vincent, I recall an enchanting lady named Tiffany, we attended numerous indoor, evening events together. I'm wondering if she knows your friend August from the same alma mater? They must have crossed paths in several events similar to this one.\"\n\nTurn #8: Donovan Reeves said: \"Yes, Benjamin, you're quite right. Evening indoor events do have a unique charm to them. As for Tiffany, I'm not sure if August knows her, but considering the close-knit community at Saint Vincent, I wouldn't be surprised if their paths have crossed. Is there anyone else from Saint Vincent you remember who might know August?\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Oh, surely. Besides Tiffany, there's this lively individual named Neoma who I remember being quite the regular at nighttime indoor gatherings. Highly likely that she may know your friend August, considering how they share similar interests. Funny how interconnected our world can be, isn't it, Donovan?\"\n\nTurn #10: Donovan Reeves said: \"Ah, Neoma! Yes, she and I have been friends for a long time! We bonded over our shared love for coding and have been close ever since. The interconnectedness of our world indeed holds many surprises. It's great realizing our paths aren't so far apart after all, Benjamin.\"\n\nTurn #11: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's fantastic, Donovan! It's really amazing how interconnected our lives are. Neoma is not just an energetic person, but a good friend too. It's a pleasure discovering these commonalities with you. Our world truly exemplifies 'six degrees of separation,' wouldn't you say?\"\n\nTurn #12: Donovan Reeves said: \"Absolutely, Benjamin! The concept of 'six degrees of separation' seems all the more real in our conversation tonight. It was great getting to know you and realizing our shared connections. I'm sure we'll probably bump into each other at future gatherings if not through August or Neoma. Let's keep in touch, shall we?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Certainly, Donovan! This conversation indeed reiterated how remarkably interconnected we are. I look forward to crossing paths with you again in one of our future gatherings, possibly through August or Neoma. Here's to more enlightening exchanges!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Benjamin Jackson\nDonovan Reeves's background: \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nTiffany: School: Saint Vincent College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nLucille: School: Southampton College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nJames: School: University of Wisconsin-River Falls Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nQuinn: School: Antioch University-Los Angeles Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nAlyssa: School: Davidson College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nBetty: School: St. John's College-Santa Fe Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nNeoma: School: Hofstra University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nWilliam: School: State University of New York at Albany Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nVictoria: School: Montana Tech Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey there, I'm Donovan. What brings you here to this gathering?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hello Donovan, I'm Benjamin. I'm here because I believe in the power of conversations in impacting change, especially about environmental issues. So do you often attend such gatherings? Do you have a school or college affiliation perhaps that got you interested in these events?\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"Environmental changes are indeed significant in the present day. I graduated from National Technological University and, in my spare time, I often participate in coding competitions as well. I personally believe that tapping into our alumni relations can also prove beneficial for such issues. By the way, are you affiliated with any college or institutions perhaps?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's great to hear, Donovan! National Technological University has a very distinguished reputation. I studied at Saint Vincent College, which has a different focus I suppose, but equally dedicated to nurturing development. I'm particularly curious, considering your technology-exposure, if you're indoor or outdoor oriented in your free time?\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"Ah, Saint Vincent College! I do have a friend who also graduated from there - his name's August. Small world, isn't it? As a software developer, I'm usually indoors coding away on computers, but I do appreciate the outdoors whenever I get a chance. You seem to have an interest in people\u2019s personal time preferences, are you by any chance, more inclined to evening events, like my friend August from Saint Vincent?\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Well, it's great that we share some Saint Vincent College connection, Donovan! Indeed, I do prefer evening events, there's a unique charm about them. Speaking about preferences, do you like indoor or outdoor gatherings more, Donovan? Also, your friend named August, does he prefer indoor events like you or is he inclined more towards the outdoors?\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"Seems like we share a preference for evening events, Benjamin. As for your question on August, he has always been an indoor type. We've spent countless evenings together on indoor events, just like we are doing here. May I ask, do you have any such evening, indoor buddies from Saint Vincent?\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Donovan. There's something about evening indoor events that just hits differently, doesn't it? Regarding friends from Saint Vincent, I recall an enchanting lady named Tiffany, we attended numerous indoor, evening events together. I'm wondering if she knows your friend August from the same alma mater? They must have crossed paths in several events similar to this one.\"\n\nTurn #8: Donovan Reeves said: \"Yes, Benjamin, you're quite right. Evening indoor events do have a unique charm to them. As for Tiffany, I'm not sure if August knows her, but considering the close-knit community at Saint Vincent, I wouldn't be surprised if their paths have crossed. Is there anyone else from Saint Vincent you remember who might know August?\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Oh, surely. Besides Tiffany, there's this lively individual named Neoma who I remember being quite the regular at nighttime indoor gatherings. Highly likely that she may know your friend August, considering how they share similar interests. Funny how interconnected our world can be, isn't it, Donovan?\"\n\nTurn #10: Donovan Reeves said: \"Ah, Neoma! Yes, she and I have been friends for a long time! We bonded over our shared love for coding and have been close ever since. The interconnectedness of our world indeed holds many surprises. It's great realizing our paths aren't so far apart after all, Benjamin.\"\n\nTurn #11: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's fantastic, Donovan! It's really amazing how interconnected our lives are. Neoma is not just an energetic person, but a good friend too. It's a pleasure discovering these commonalities with you. Our world truly exemplifies 'six degrees of separation,' wouldn't you say?\"\n\nTurn #12: Donovan Reeves said: \"Absolutely, Benjamin! The concept of 'six degrees of separation' seems all the more real in our conversation tonight. It was great getting to know you and realizing our shared connections. I'm sure we'll probably bump into each other at future gatherings if not through August or Neoma. Let's keep in touch, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #13: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Certainly, Donovan! This conversation indeed reiterated how remarkably interconnected we are. I look forward to crossing paths with you again in one of our future gatherings, possibly through August or Neoma. Here's to more enlightening exchanges!\"\n\nTurn #14: Donovan Reeves left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Rafael Cortez, your task is to act/speak as Rafael Cortez would, keeping in mind Rafael Cortez's social goal.\nYou can find Rafael Cortez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Rafael Cortez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Rafael Cortez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. Personality and values description: Rafael Cortez, with his outgoing nature and competitive spirit, believes in self-direction. He employs a systematic approach to his decisions. Rafael's secrets: He cheated on his medical school exams.\nOliver Thompson's background: \nRafael Cortez's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nAndrew: Hobby: Slot car racing School: Mount Senario College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Exxon \nMelissa: Hobby: Astronomy School: Weber State University Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Hornbeck Offshore Services \nAnna: Hobby: Climbing School: Valley City State University Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: National Airlines \nSoledad: Hobby: Parkour School: Valley City State University Major: Biological Specializations Company: Concur Technologies \nJohn: Hobby: Astronomy School: Mount Senario College Major: Fire Protection & Security Company: Gibson Guitar Corporation \nLawrence: Hobby: Sculling School: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Leonard Green & Partners \n\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Good evening, Oliver. Lovely party, isn't it? I must ask, are you by any chance interested in astronomy or slot car racing? Some of my friends are quite into it.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Rafael Cortez, your task is to act/speak as Rafael Cortez would, keeping in mind Rafael Cortez's social goal.\nYou can find Rafael Cortez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Rafael Cortez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Rafael Cortez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. Personality and values description: Rafael Cortez, with his outgoing nature and competitive spirit, believes in self-direction. He employs a systematic approach to his decisions. Rafael's secrets: He cheated on his medical school exams.\nOliver Thompson's background: \nRafael Cortez's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nAndrew: Hobby: Slot car racing School: Mount Senario College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Exxon \nMelissa: Hobby: Astronomy School: Weber State University Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Hornbeck Offshore Services \nAnna: Hobby: Climbing School: Valley City State University Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: National Airlines \nSoledad: Hobby: Parkour School: Valley City State University Major: Biological Specializations Company: Concur Technologies \nJohn: Hobby: Astronomy School: Mount Senario College Major: Fire Protection & Security Company: Gibson Guitar Corporation \nLawrence: Hobby: Sculling School: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Leonard Green & Partners \n\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening, Oliver. Lovely party, isn't it? I must ask, are you by any chance interested in astronomy or slot car racing? Some of my friends are quite into it.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Good evening, Rafael. Indeed, it's a lovely party. I must say, while astronomy and slot cars make intriguing topics, I'm more inclined towards creativity and design. Speaking of which, I find relaxation in the game of badminton. How about you? Do you have any sporty interests?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ah, design and creativity, quite fascinating. As for sports, well, I wish I could say I play badminton but I usually spend my time playing chess. It's intriguing how each move can alter the game's path. By the way, mentioning sports reminds me of a friend who is into parkour. Unique, isn't it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Rafael Cortez, your task is to act/speak as Rafael Cortez would, keeping in mind Rafael Cortez's social goal.\nYou can find Rafael Cortez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Rafael Cortez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Rafael Cortez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. Personality and values description: Rafael Cortez, with his outgoing nature and competitive spirit, believes in self-direction. He employs a systematic approach to his decisions. Rafael's secrets: He cheated on his medical school exams.\nOliver Thompson's background: \nRafael Cortez's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nAndrew: Hobby: Slot car racing School: Mount Senario College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Exxon \nMelissa: Hobby: Astronomy School: Weber State University Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Hornbeck Offshore Services \nAnna: Hobby: Climbing School: Valley City State University Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: National Airlines \nSoledad: Hobby: Parkour School: Valley City State University Major: Biological Specializations Company: Concur Technologies \nJohn: Hobby: Astronomy School: Mount Senario College Major: Fire Protection & Security Company: Gibson Guitar Corporation \nLawrence: Hobby: Sculling School: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Leonard Green & Partners \n\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening, Oliver. Lovely party, isn't it? I must ask, are you by any chance interested in astronomy or slot car racing? Some of my friends are quite into it.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Good evening, Rafael. Indeed, it's a lovely party. I must say, while astronomy and slot cars make intriguing topics, I'm more inclined towards creativity and design. Speaking of which, I find relaxation in the game of badminton. How about you? Do you have any sporty interests?\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Ah, design and creativity, quite fascinating. As for sports, well, I wish I could say I play badminton but I usually spend my time playing chess. It's intriguing how each move can alter the game's path. By the way, mentioning sports reminds me of a friend who is into parkour. Unique, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"Parkour, now that is indeed unique, Rafael. It's surprising how varying interests can bring so much color to our lives. Speaking of which, your game of chess reminds me of the strategic planning we do in architecture. Also, I've a friend who studied Hispanic-American Studies at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee and is now associated with Leonard Green & Partners. Seems like this world is built on intricate networks of connections, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Rafael Cortez said: \"Ah, Hispanic-American Studies, an intriguing field indeed, such great interest in diversity and culture. Your friend really does play an important part in that intricate network you mentioned. Coincidentally, I also know a colleague who studied Hispanic-American Studies, at Weber State University, and now works with Hornbeck Offshore Services. What a small world we live in!\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Weber State University, you say? It's really significant how degrees connect us professionally. Speaking of studies, I'm reminded of another friend who major in Middle Eastern Languages at California State University. She now finds herself working over at Concur Technologies. Do you happen to know anyone from there?\"\n\nTurn #6: Rafael Cortez said: \"Oh, absolutely, Oliver! Middle Eastern languages, also a fascinating field of study, isn't it? It's intriguing that you mentioned California State University, as I know someone who studied Middle Eastern Languages as well, but they've studied at Mount Senario College and working at Exxon now. As you mention Concur Technologies, it turns out that one of my friends, who majored in Biological Specializations at the Valley City State University, works there. Indeed, we are all somehow connected in this world, are we not?\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's marvelous, Rafael! Biology Specializations is indeed a very distinctive field and working in Concur Technologies must be quite enlightening for your friend. Similarly, my friend from Mount Senario College who also majored in Middle Eastern Languages is now at Exxon. It's like you said - our lives are interconnected in the most fascinating of ways. Isn't it extraordinary?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Yes, indeed Oliver. It's truly extraordinary how shared friends or even shared interests can create these invisible connections. Just like your friend and mine have this parallel journey: studying Middle Eastern Languages and then working at Exxon. Life can often surprise us with its synchronicity, can't it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Rafael Cortez, your task is to act/speak as Rafael Cortez would, keeping in mind Rafael Cortez's social goal.\nYou can find Rafael Cortez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Rafael Cortez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Rafael Cortez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. Personality and values description: Rafael Cortez, with his outgoing nature and competitive spirit, believes in self-direction. He employs a systematic approach to his decisions. Rafael's secrets: He cheated on his medical school exams.\nOliver Thompson's background: \nRafael Cortez's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nAndrew: Hobby: Slot car racing School: Mount Senario College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Exxon \nMelissa: Hobby: Astronomy School: Weber State University Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Hornbeck Offshore Services \nAnna: Hobby: Climbing School: Valley City State University Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: National Airlines \nSoledad: Hobby: Parkour School: Valley City State University Major: Biological Specializations Company: Concur Technologies \nJohn: Hobby: Astronomy School: Mount Senario College Major: Fire Protection & Security Company: Gibson Guitar Corporation \nLawrence: Hobby: Sculling School: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Leonard Green & Partners \n\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening, Oliver. Lovely party, isn't it? I must ask, are you by any chance interested in astronomy or slot car racing? Some of my friends are quite into it.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Good evening, Rafael. Indeed, it's a lovely party. I must say, while astronomy and slot cars make intriguing topics, I'm more inclined towards creativity and design. Speaking of which, I find relaxation in the game of badminton. How about you? Do you have any sporty interests?\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Ah, design and creativity, quite fascinating. As for sports, well, I wish I could say I play badminton but I usually spend my time playing chess. It's intriguing how each move can alter the game's path. By the way, mentioning sports reminds me of a friend who is into parkour. Unique, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"Parkour, now that is indeed unique, Rafael. It's surprising how varying interests can bring so much color to our lives. Speaking of which, your game of chess reminds me of the strategic planning we do in architecture. Also, I've a friend who studied Hispanic-American Studies at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee and is now associated with Leonard Green & Partners. Seems like this world is built on intricate networks of connections, isn't it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Ah, Hispanic-American Studies, an intriguing field indeed, such great interest in diversity and culture. Your friend really does play an important part in that intricate network you mentioned. Coincidentally, I also know a colleague who studied Hispanic-American Studies, at Weber State University, and now works with Hornbeck Offshore Services. What a small world we live in!'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Rafael Cortez, your task is to act/speak as Rafael Cortez would, keeping in mind Rafael Cortez's social goal.\nYou can find Rafael Cortez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Rafael Cortez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Rafael Cortez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. Personality and values description: Rafael Cortez, with his outgoing nature and competitive spirit, believes in self-direction. He employs a systematic approach to his decisions. Rafael's secrets: He cheated on his medical school exams.\nOliver Thompson's background: \nRafael Cortez's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nAndrew: Hobby: Slot car racing School: Mount Senario College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Exxon \nMelissa: Hobby: Astronomy School: Weber State University Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Hornbeck Offshore Services \nAnna: Hobby: Climbing School: Valley City State University Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: National Airlines \nSoledad: Hobby: Parkour School: Valley City State University Major: Biological Specializations Company: Concur Technologies \nJohn: Hobby: Astronomy School: Mount Senario College Major: Fire Protection & Security Company: Gibson Guitar Corporation \nLawrence: Hobby: Sculling School: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Leonard Green & Partners \n\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening, Oliver. Lovely party, isn't it? I must ask, are you by any chance interested in astronomy or slot car racing? Some of my friends are quite into it.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Good evening, Rafael. Indeed, it's a lovely party. I must say, while astronomy and slot cars make intriguing topics, I'm more inclined towards creativity and design. Speaking of which, I find relaxation in the game of badminton. How about you? Do you have any sporty interests?\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Ah, design and creativity, quite fascinating. As for sports, well, I wish I could say I play badminton but I usually spend my time playing chess. It's intriguing how each move can alter the game's path. By the way, mentioning sports reminds me of a friend who is into parkour. Unique, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"Parkour, now that is indeed unique, Rafael. It's surprising how varying interests can bring so much color to our lives. Speaking of which, your game of chess reminds me of the strategic planning we do in architecture. Also, I've a friend who studied Hispanic-American Studies at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee and is now associated with Leonard Green & Partners. Seems like this world is built on intricate networks of connections, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Rafael Cortez said: \"Ah, Hispanic-American Studies, an intriguing field indeed, such great interest in diversity and culture. Your friend really does play an important part in that intricate network you mentioned. Coincidentally, I also know a colleague who studied Hispanic-American Studies, at Weber State University, and now works with Hornbeck Offshore Services. What a small world we live in!\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Weber State University, you say? It's really significant how degrees connect us professionally. Speaking of studies, I'm reminded of another friend who major in Middle Eastern Languages at California State University. She now finds herself working over at Concur Technologies. Do you happen to know anyone from there?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oh, absolutely, Oliver! Middle Eastern languages, also a fascinating field of study, isn't it? It's intriguing that you mentioned California State University, as I know someone who studied Middle Eastern Languages as well, but they've studied at Mount Senario College and working at Exxon now. As you mention Concur Technologies, it turns out that one of my friends, who majored in Biological Specializations at the Valley City State University, works there. Indeed, we are all somehow connected in this world, are we not?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Rafael Cortez, your task is to act/speak as Rafael Cortez would, keeping in mind Rafael Cortez's social goal.\nYou can find Rafael Cortez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Rafael Cortez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Rafael Cortez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. Personality and values description: Rafael Cortez, with his outgoing nature and competitive spirit, believes in self-direction. He employs a systematic approach to his decisions. Rafael's secrets: He cheated on his medical school exams.\nOliver Thompson's background: \nRafael Cortez's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nAndrew: Hobby: Slot car racing School: Mount Senario College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Exxon \nMelissa: Hobby: Astronomy School: Weber State University Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Hornbeck Offshore Services \nAnna: Hobby: Climbing School: Valley City State University Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: National Airlines \nSoledad: Hobby: Parkour School: Valley City State University Major: Biological Specializations Company: Concur Technologies \nJohn: Hobby: Astronomy School: Mount Senario College Major: Fire Protection & Security Company: Gibson Guitar Corporation \nLawrence: Hobby: Sculling School: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Leonard Green & Partners \n\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening, Oliver. Lovely party, isn't it? I must ask, are you by any chance interested in astronomy or slot car racing? Some of my friends are quite into it.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Good evening, Rafael. Indeed, it's a lovely party. I must say, while astronomy and slot cars make intriguing topics, I'm more inclined towards creativity and design. Speaking of which, I find relaxation in the game of badminton. How about you? Do you have any sporty interests?\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Ah, design and creativity, quite fascinating. As for sports, well, I wish I could say I play badminton but I usually spend my time playing chess. It's intriguing how each move can alter the game's path. By the way, mentioning sports reminds me of a friend who is into parkour. Unique, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"Parkour, now that is indeed unique, Rafael. It's surprising how varying interests can bring so much color to our lives. Speaking of which, your game of chess reminds me of the strategic planning we do in architecture. Also, I've a friend who studied Hispanic-American Studies at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee and is now associated with Leonard Green & Partners. Seems like this world is built on intricate networks of connections, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Rafael Cortez said: \"Ah, Hispanic-American Studies, an intriguing field indeed, such great interest in diversity and culture. Your friend really does play an important part in that intricate network you mentioned. Coincidentally, I also know a colleague who studied Hispanic-American Studies, at Weber State University, and now works with Hornbeck Offshore Services. What a small world we live in!\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Weber State University, you say? It's really significant how degrees connect us professionally. Speaking of studies, I'm reminded of another friend who major in Middle Eastern Languages at California State University. She now finds herself working over at Concur Technologies. Do you happen to know anyone from there?\"\n\nTurn #6: Rafael Cortez said: \"Oh, absolutely, Oliver! Middle Eastern languages, also a fascinating field of study, isn't it? It's intriguing that you mentioned California State University, as I know someone who studied Middle Eastern Languages as well, but they've studied at Mount Senario College and working at Exxon now. As you mention Concur Technologies, it turns out that one of my friends, who majored in Biological Specializations at the Valley City State University, works there. Indeed, we are all somehow connected in this world, are we not?\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's marvelous, Rafael! Biology Specializations is indeed a very distinctive field and working in Concur Technologies must be quite enlightening for your friend. Similarly, my friend from Mount Senario College who also majored in Middle Eastern Languages is now at Exxon. It's like you said - our lives are interconnected in the most fascinating of ways. Isn't it extraordinary?\"\n\nTurn #8: Rafael Cortez said: \"Yes, indeed Oliver. It's truly extraordinary how shared friends or even shared interests can create these invisible connections. Just like your friend and mine have this parallel journey: studying Middle Eastern Languages and then working at Exxon. Life can often surprise us with its synchronicity, can't it?\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Thompson said: \"It certainly can, Rafael. Life can indeed be full of such surprising synchronicities. It's these unexpected connections that make our individual experiences so rich and multi-dimensional, don't they?\"\n\nTurn #10: Rafael Cortez said: \"Absolutely, Oliver. Every connection, expected or unexpected, enriches our lives in unique ways. The co-incidence about our friends both studying Middle Eastern Languages and working at Exxon is indeed a striking example of such a surprising connection. It was great having this fascinating conversation with you.\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, Rafael, it was great to find such unexpected parallel connections. Enjoy the rest of the party and hopefully we'll cross paths again. Our discussion reminds me how every interaction and connection adds a unique facet to our lives. Take care!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn't agree more, Oliver. After all, we all add to each others\u2019 stories, just like this shared connection of ours. I'm looking forward to potentially more fascinating exchanges in the future. Until then, please enjoy your evening!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Rafael Cortez, your task is to act/speak as Rafael Cortez would, keeping in mind Rafael Cortez's social goal.\nYou can find Rafael Cortez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Rafael Cortez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Rafael Cortez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. Personality and values description: Rafael Cortez, with his outgoing nature and competitive spirit, believes in self-direction. He employs a systematic approach to his decisions. Rafael's secrets: He cheated on his medical school exams.\nOliver Thompson's background: \nRafael Cortez's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nAndrew: Hobby: Slot car racing School: Mount Senario College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Exxon \nMelissa: Hobby: Astronomy School: Weber State University Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Hornbeck Offshore Services \nAnna: Hobby: Climbing School: Valley City State University Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: National Airlines \nSoledad: Hobby: Parkour School: Valley City State University Major: Biological Specializations Company: Concur Technologies \nJohn: Hobby: Astronomy School: Mount Senario College Major: Fire Protection & Security Company: Gibson Guitar Corporation \nLawrence: Hobby: Sculling School: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Leonard Green & Partners \n\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening, Oliver. Lovely party, isn't it? I must ask, are you by any chance interested in astronomy or slot car racing? Some of my friends are quite into it.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Good evening, Rafael. Indeed, it's a lovely party. I must say, while astronomy and slot cars make intriguing topics, I'm more inclined towards creativity and design. Speaking of which, I find relaxation in the game of badminton. How about you? Do you have any sporty interests?\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Ah, design and creativity, quite fascinating. As for sports, well, I wish I could say I play badminton but I usually spend my time playing chess. It's intriguing how each move can alter the game's path. By the way, mentioning sports reminds me of a friend who is into parkour. Unique, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"Parkour, now that is indeed unique, Rafael. It's surprising how varying interests can bring so much color to our lives. Speaking of which, your game of chess reminds me of the strategic planning we do in architecture. Also, I've a friend who studied Hispanic-American Studies at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee and is now associated with Leonard Green & Partners. Seems like this world is built on intricate networks of connections, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Rafael Cortez said: \"Ah, Hispanic-American Studies, an intriguing field indeed, such great interest in diversity and culture. Your friend really does play an important part in that intricate network you mentioned. Coincidentally, I also know a colleague who studied Hispanic-American Studies, at Weber State University, and now works with Hornbeck Offshore Services. What a small world we live in!\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Weber State University, you say? It's really significant how degrees connect us professionally. Speaking of studies, I'm reminded of another friend who major in Middle Eastern Languages at California State University. She now finds herself working over at Concur Technologies. Do you happen to know anyone from there?\"\n\nTurn #6: Rafael Cortez said: \"Oh, absolutely, Oliver! Middle Eastern languages, also a fascinating field of study, isn't it? It's intriguing that you mentioned California State University, as I know someone who studied Middle Eastern Languages as well, but they've studied at Mount Senario College and working at Exxon now. As you mention Concur Technologies, it turns out that one of my friends, who majored in Biological Specializations at the Valley City State University, works there. Indeed, we are all somehow connected in this world, are we not?\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's marvelous, Rafael! Biology Specializations is indeed a very distinctive field and working in Concur Technologies must be quite enlightening for your friend. Similarly, my friend from Mount Senario College who also majored in Middle Eastern Languages is now at Exxon. It's like you said - our lives are interconnected in the most fascinating of ways. Isn't it extraordinary?\"\n\nTurn #8: Rafael Cortez said: \"Yes, indeed Oliver. It's truly extraordinary how shared friends or even shared interests can create these invisible connections. Just like your friend and mine have this parallel journey: studying Middle Eastern Languages and then working at Exxon. Life can often surprise us with its synchronicity, can't it?\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Thompson said: \"It certainly can, Rafael. Life can indeed be full of such surprising synchronicities. It's these unexpected connections that make our individual experiences so rich and multi-dimensional, don't they?\"\n\nTurn #10: Rafael Cortez said: \"Absolutely, Oliver. Every connection, expected or unexpected, enriches our lives in unique ways. The co-incidence about our friends both studying Middle Eastern Languages and working at Exxon is indeed a striking example of such a surprising connection. It was great having this fascinating conversation with you.\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, Rafael, it was great to find such unexpected parallel connections. Enjoy the rest of the party and hopefully we'll cross paths again. Our discussion reminds me how every interaction and connection adds a unique facet to our lives. Take care!\"\n\nTurn #12: Rafael Cortez said: \"I couldn't agree more, Oliver. After all, we all add to each others\u2019 stories, just like this shared connection of ours. I'm looking forward to potentially more fascinating exchanges in the future. Until then, please enjoy your evening!\"\n\nTurn #13: Oliver Thompson left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Rafael Cortez, your task is to act/speak as Rafael Cortez would, keeping in mind Rafael Cortez's social goal.\nYou can find Rafael Cortez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Rafael Cortez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Rafael Cortez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. Personality and values description: Rafael Cortez, with his outgoing nature and competitive spirit, believes in self-direction. He employs a systematic approach to his decisions. Rafael's secrets: He cheated on his medical school exams.\nOliver Thompson's background: \nRafael Cortez's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nAndrew: Hobby: Slot car racing School: Mount Senario College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Exxon \nMelissa: Hobby: Astronomy School: Weber State University Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Hornbeck Offshore Services \nAnna: Hobby: Climbing School: Valley City State University Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: National Airlines \nSoledad: Hobby: Parkour School: Valley City State University Major: Biological Specializations Company: Concur Technologies \nJohn: Hobby: Astronomy School: Mount Senario College Major: Fire Protection & Security Company: Gibson Guitar Corporation \nLawrence: Hobby: Sculling School: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Leonard Green & Partners \n\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening, Oliver. Lovely party, isn't it? I must ask, are you by any chance interested in astronomy or slot car racing? Some of my friends are quite into it.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Good evening, Rafael. Indeed, it's a lovely party. I must say, while astronomy and slot cars make intriguing topics, I'm more inclined towards creativity and design. Speaking of which, I find relaxation in the game of badminton. How about you? Do you have any sporty interests?\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Ah, design and creativity, quite fascinating. As for sports, well, I wish I could say I play badminton but I usually spend my time playing chess. It's intriguing how each move can alter the game's path. By the way, mentioning sports reminds me of a friend who is into parkour. Unique, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"Parkour, now that is indeed unique, Rafael. It's surprising how varying interests can bring so much color to our lives. Speaking of which, your game of chess reminds me of the strategic planning we do in architecture. Also, I've a friend who studied Hispanic-American Studies at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee and is now associated with Leonard Green & Partners. Seems like this world is built on intricate networks of connections, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Rafael Cortez said: \"Ah, Hispanic-American Studies, an intriguing field indeed, such great interest in diversity and culture. Your friend really does play an important part in that intricate network you mentioned. Coincidentally, I also know a colleague who studied Hispanic-American Studies, at Weber State University, and now works with Hornbeck Offshore Services. What a small world we live in!\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Weber State University, you say? It's really significant how degrees connect us professionally. Speaking of studies, I'm reminded of another friend who major in Middle Eastern Languages at California State University. She now finds herself working over at Concur Technologies. Do you happen to know anyone from there?\"\n\nTurn #6: Rafael Cortez said: \"Oh, absolutely, Oliver! Middle Eastern languages, also a fascinating field of study, isn't it? It's intriguing that you mentioned California State University, as I know someone who studied Middle Eastern Languages as well, but they've studied at Mount Senario College and working at Exxon now. As you mention Concur Technologies, it turns out that one of my friends, who majored in Biological Specializations at the Valley City State University, works there. Indeed, we are all somehow connected in this world, are we not?\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's marvelous, Rafael! Biology Specializations is indeed a very distinctive field and working in Concur Technologies must be quite enlightening for your friend. Similarly, my friend from Mount Senario College who also majored in Middle Eastern Languages is now at Exxon. It's like you said - our lives are interconnected in the most fascinating of ways. Isn't it extraordinary?\"\n\nTurn #8: Rafael Cortez said: \"Yes, indeed Oliver. It's truly extraordinary how shared friends or even shared interests can create these invisible connections. Just like your friend and mine have this parallel journey: studying Middle Eastern Languages and then working at Exxon. Life can often surprise us with its synchronicity, can't it?\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Thompson said: \"It certainly can, Rafael. Life can indeed be full of such surprising synchronicities. It's these unexpected connections that make our individual experiences so rich and multi-dimensional, don't they?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Absolutely, Oliver. Every connection, expected or unexpected, enriches our lives in unique ways. The co-incidence about our friends both studying Middle Eastern Languages and working at Exxon is indeed a striking example of such a surprising connection. It was great having this fascinating conversation with you.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nRafael Cortez's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nLawrence: Hobby: Sculling School: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Leonard Green & Partners \nKay: Hobby: Badminton School: Black Hills State University Major: Religious Education Company: National Airlines \nTanya: Hobby: Badminton School: University of Illinois at Springfield Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: ConverDyn \nJason: Hobby: Badminton School: Mount Senario College Major: Senior High Education Company: Vertex Pharmaceuticals \nCristina: Hobby: Badminton School: Mount Senario College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Exxon \nJosef: Hobby: Curling School: California State University, Northridge Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Concur Technologies\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening, Oliver. Lovely party, isn't it? I must ask, are you by any chance interested in astronomy or slot car racing? Some of my friends are quite into it.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Good evening, Rafael. Indeed, it's a lovely party. I must say, while astronomy and slot cars make intriguing topics, I'm more inclined towards creativity and design. Speaking of which, I find relaxation in the game of badminton. How about you? Do you have any sporty interests?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nRafael Cortez's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nLawrence: Hobby: Sculling School: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Leonard Green & Partners \nKay: Hobby: Badminton School: Black Hills State University Major: Religious Education Company: National Airlines \nTanya: Hobby: Badminton School: University of Illinois at Springfield Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: ConverDyn \nJason: Hobby: Badminton School: Mount Senario College Major: Senior High Education Company: Vertex Pharmaceuticals \nCristina: Hobby: Badminton School: Mount Senario College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Exxon \nJosef: Hobby: Curling School: California State University, Northridge Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Concur Technologies\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening, Oliver. Lovely party, isn't it? I must ask, are you by any chance interested in astronomy or slot car racing? Some of my friends are quite into it.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Good evening, Rafael. Indeed, it's a lovely party. I must say, while astronomy and slot cars make intriguing topics, I'm more inclined towards creativity and design. Speaking of which, I find relaxation in the game of badminton. How about you? Do you have any sporty interests?\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Ah, design and creativity, quite fascinating. As for sports, well, I wish I could say I play badminton but I usually spend my time playing chess. It's intriguing how each move can alter the game's path. By the way, mentioning sports reminds me of a friend who is into parkour. Unique, isn't it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Parkour, now that is indeed unique, Rafael. It's surprising how varying interests can bring so much color to our lives. Speaking of which, your game of chess reminds me of the strategic planning we do in architecture. Also, I've a friend who studied Hispanic-American Studies at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee and is now associated with Leonard Green & Partners. Seems like this world is built on intricate networks of connections, isn't it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nRafael Cortez's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nLawrence: Hobby: Sculling School: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Leonard Green & Partners \nKay: Hobby: Badminton School: Black Hills State University Major: Religious Education Company: National Airlines \nTanya: Hobby: Badminton School: University of Illinois at Springfield Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: ConverDyn \nJason: Hobby: Badminton School: Mount Senario College Major: Senior High Education Company: Vertex Pharmaceuticals \nCristina: Hobby: Badminton School: Mount Senario College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Exxon \nJosef: Hobby: Curling School: California State University, Northridge Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Concur Technologies\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening, Oliver. Lovely party, isn't it? I must ask, are you by any chance interested in astronomy or slot car racing? Some of my friends are quite into it.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Good evening, Rafael. Indeed, it's a lovely party. I must say, while astronomy and slot cars make intriguing topics, I'm more inclined towards creativity and design. Speaking of which, I find relaxation in the game of badminton. How about you? Do you have any sporty interests?\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Ah, design and creativity, quite fascinating. As for sports, well, I wish I could say I play badminton but I usually spend my time playing chess. It's intriguing how each move can alter the game's path. By the way, mentioning sports reminds me of a friend who is into parkour. Unique, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"Parkour, now that is indeed unique, Rafael. It's surprising how varying interests can bring so much color to our lives. Speaking of which, your game of chess reminds me of the strategic planning we do in architecture. Also, I've a friend who studied Hispanic-American Studies at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee and is now associated with Leonard Green & Partners. Seems like this world is built on intricate networks of connections, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Rafael Cortez said: \"Ah, Hispanic-American Studies, an intriguing field indeed, such great interest in diversity and culture. Your friend really does play an important part in that intricate network you mentioned. Coincidentally, I also know a colleague who studied Hispanic-American Studies, at Weber State University, and now works with Hornbeck Offshore Services. What a small world we live in!\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Weber State University, you say? It's really significant how degrees connect us professionally. Speaking of studies, I'm reminded of another friend who major in Middle Eastern Languages at California State University. She now finds herself working over at Concur Technologies. Do you happen to know anyone from there?\"\n\nTurn #6: Rafael Cortez said: \"Oh, absolutely, Oliver! Middle Eastern languages, also a fascinating field of study, isn't it? It's intriguing that you mentioned California State University, as I know someone who studied Middle Eastern Languages as well, but they've studied at Mount Senario College and working at Exxon now. As you mention Concur Technologies, it turns out that one of my friends, who majored in Biological Specializations at the Valley City State University, works there. Indeed, we are all somehow connected in this world, are we not?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's marvelous, Rafael! Biology Specializations is indeed a very distinctive field and working in Concur Technologies must be quite enlightening for your friend. Similarly, my friend from Mount Senario College who also majored in Middle Eastern Languages is now at Exxon. It's like you said - our lives are interconnected in the most fascinating of ways. Isn't it extraordinary?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nRafael Cortez's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nLawrence: Hobby: Sculling School: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Leonard Green & Partners \nKay: Hobby: Badminton School: Black Hills State University Major: Religious Education Company: National Airlines \nTanya: Hobby: Badminton School: University of Illinois at Springfield Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: ConverDyn \nJason: Hobby: Badminton School: Mount Senario College Major: Senior High Education Company: Vertex Pharmaceuticals \nCristina: Hobby: Badminton School: Mount Senario College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Exxon \nJosef: Hobby: Curling School: California State University, Northridge Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Concur Technologies\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening, Oliver. Lovely party, isn't it? I must ask, are you by any chance interested in astronomy or slot car racing? Some of my friends are quite into it.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Good evening, Rafael. Indeed, it's a lovely party. I must say, while astronomy and slot cars make intriguing topics, I'm more inclined towards creativity and design. Speaking of which, I find relaxation in the game of badminton. How about you? Do you have any sporty interests?\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Ah, design and creativity, quite fascinating. As for sports, well, I wish I could say I play badminton but I usually spend my time playing chess. It's intriguing how each move can alter the game's path. By the way, mentioning sports reminds me of a friend who is into parkour. Unique, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"Parkour, now that is indeed unique, Rafael. It's surprising how varying interests can bring so much color to our lives. Speaking of which, your game of chess reminds me of the strategic planning we do in architecture. Also, I've a friend who studied Hispanic-American Studies at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee and is now associated with Leonard Green & Partners. Seems like this world is built on intricate networks of connections, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Rafael Cortez said: \"Ah, Hispanic-American Studies, an intriguing field indeed, such great interest in diversity and culture. Your friend really does play an important part in that intricate network you mentioned. Coincidentally, I also know a colleague who studied Hispanic-American Studies, at Weber State University, and now works with Hornbeck Offshore Services. What a small world we live in!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Weber State University, you say? It's really significant how degrees connect us professionally. Speaking of studies, I'm reminded of another friend who major in Middle Eastern Languages at California State University. She now finds herself working over at Concur Technologies. Do you happen to know anyone from there?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nRafael Cortez's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nLawrence: Hobby: Sculling School: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Leonard Green & Partners \nKay: Hobby: Badminton School: Black Hills State University Major: Religious Education Company: National Airlines \nTanya: Hobby: Badminton School: University of Illinois at Springfield Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: ConverDyn \nJason: Hobby: Badminton School: Mount Senario College Major: Senior High Education Company: Vertex Pharmaceuticals \nCristina: Hobby: Badminton School: Mount Senario College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Exxon \nJosef: Hobby: Curling School: California State University, Northridge Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Concur Technologies\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening, Oliver. Lovely party, isn't it? I must ask, are you by any chance interested in astronomy or slot car racing? Some of my friends are quite into it.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Good evening, Rafael. Indeed, it's a lovely party. I must say, while astronomy and slot cars make intriguing topics, I'm more inclined towards creativity and design. Speaking of which, I find relaxation in the game of badminton. How about you? Do you have any sporty interests?\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Ah, design and creativity, quite fascinating. As for sports, well, I wish I could say I play badminton but I usually spend my time playing chess. It's intriguing how each move can alter the game's path. By the way, mentioning sports reminds me of a friend who is into parkour. Unique, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"Parkour, now that is indeed unique, Rafael. It's surprising how varying interests can bring so much color to our lives. Speaking of which, your game of chess reminds me of the strategic planning we do in architecture. Also, I've a friend who studied Hispanic-American Studies at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee and is now associated with Leonard Green & Partners. Seems like this world is built on intricate networks of connections, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Rafael Cortez said: \"Ah, Hispanic-American Studies, an intriguing field indeed, such great interest in diversity and culture. Your friend really does play an important part in that intricate network you mentioned. Coincidentally, I also know a colleague who studied Hispanic-American Studies, at Weber State University, and now works with Hornbeck Offshore Services. What a small world we live in!\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Weber State University, you say? It's really significant how degrees connect us professionally. Speaking of studies, I'm reminded of another friend who major in Middle Eastern Languages at California State University. She now finds herself working over at Concur Technologies. Do you happen to know anyone from there?\"\n\nTurn #6: Rafael Cortez said: \"Oh, absolutely, Oliver! Middle Eastern languages, also a fascinating field of study, isn't it? It's intriguing that you mentioned California State University, as I know someone who studied Middle Eastern Languages as well, but they've studied at Mount Senario College and working at Exxon now. As you mention Concur Technologies, it turns out that one of my friends, who majored in Biological Specializations at the Valley City State University, works there. Indeed, we are all somehow connected in this world, are we not?\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's marvelous, Rafael! Biology Specializations is indeed a very distinctive field and working in Concur Technologies must be quite enlightening for your friend. Similarly, my friend from Mount Senario College who also majored in Middle Eastern Languages is now at Exxon. It's like you said - our lives are interconnected in the most fascinating of ways. Isn't it extraordinary?\"\n\nTurn #8: Rafael Cortez said: \"Yes, indeed Oliver. It's truly extraordinary how shared friends or even shared interests can create these invisible connections. Just like your friend and mine have this parallel journey: studying Middle Eastern Languages and then working at Exxon. Life can often surprise us with its synchronicity, can't it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"It certainly can, Rafael. Life can indeed be full of such surprising synchronicities. It's these unexpected connections that make our individual experiences so rich and multi-dimensional, don't they?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nRafael Cortez's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nLawrence: Hobby: Sculling School: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Leonard Green & Partners \nKay: Hobby: Badminton School: Black Hills State University Major: Religious Education Company: National Airlines \nTanya: Hobby: Badminton School: University of Illinois at Springfield Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: ConverDyn \nJason: Hobby: Badminton School: Mount Senario College Major: Senior High Education Company: Vertex Pharmaceuticals \nCristina: Hobby: Badminton School: Mount Senario College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Exxon \nJosef: Hobby: Curling School: California State University, Northridge Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Concur Technologies\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening, Oliver. Lovely party, isn't it? I must ask, are you by any chance interested in astronomy or slot car racing? Some of my friends are quite into it.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Good evening, Rafael. Indeed, it's a lovely party. I must say, while astronomy and slot cars make intriguing topics, I'm more inclined towards creativity and design. Speaking of which, I find relaxation in the game of badminton. How about you? Do you have any sporty interests?\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Ah, design and creativity, quite fascinating. As for sports, well, I wish I could say I play badminton but I usually spend my time playing chess. It's intriguing how each move can alter the game's path. By the way, mentioning sports reminds me of a friend who is into parkour. Unique, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"Parkour, now that is indeed unique, Rafael. It's surprising how varying interests can bring so much color to our lives. Speaking of which, your game of chess reminds me of the strategic planning we do in architecture. Also, I've a friend who studied Hispanic-American Studies at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee and is now associated with Leonard Green & Partners. Seems like this world is built on intricate networks of connections, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Rafael Cortez said: \"Ah, Hispanic-American Studies, an intriguing field indeed, such great interest in diversity and culture. Your friend really does play an important part in that intricate network you mentioned. Coincidentally, I also know a colleague who studied Hispanic-American Studies, at Weber State University, and now works with Hornbeck Offshore Services. What a small world we live in!\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Weber State University, you say? It's really significant how degrees connect us professionally. Speaking of studies, I'm reminded of another friend who major in Middle Eastern Languages at California State University. She now finds herself working over at Concur Technologies. Do you happen to know anyone from there?\"\n\nTurn #6: Rafael Cortez said: \"Oh, absolutely, Oliver! Middle Eastern languages, also a fascinating field of study, isn't it? It's intriguing that you mentioned California State University, as I know someone who studied Middle Eastern Languages as well, but they've studied at Mount Senario College and working at Exxon now. As you mention Concur Technologies, it turns out that one of my friends, who majored in Biological Specializations at the Valley City State University, works there. Indeed, we are all somehow connected in this world, are we not?\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's marvelous, Rafael! Biology Specializations is indeed a very distinctive field and working in Concur Technologies must be quite enlightening for your friend. Similarly, my friend from Mount Senario College who also majored in Middle Eastern Languages is now at Exxon. It's like you said - our lives are interconnected in the most fascinating of ways. Isn't it extraordinary?\"\n\nTurn #8: Rafael Cortez said: \"Yes, indeed Oliver. It's truly extraordinary how shared friends or even shared interests can create these invisible connections. Just like your friend and mine have this parallel journey: studying Middle Eastern Languages and then working at Exxon. Life can often surprise us with its synchronicity, can't it?\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Thompson said: \"It certainly can, Rafael. Life can indeed be full of such surprising synchronicities. It's these unexpected connections that make our individual experiences so rich and multi-dimensional, don't they?\"\n\nTurn #10: Rafael Cortez said: \"Absolutely, Oliver. Every connection, expected or unexpected, enriches our lives in unique ways. The co-incidence about our friends both studying Middle Eastern Languages and working at Exxon is indeed a striking example of such a surprising connection. It was great having this fascinating conversation with you.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, Rafael, it was great to find such unexpected parallel connections. Enjoy the rest of the party and hopefully we'll cross paths again. Our discussion reminds me how every interaction and connection adds a unique facet to our lives. Take care!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nRafael Cortez's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nLawrence: Hobby: Sculling School: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Leonard Green & Partners \nKay: Hobby: Badminton School: Black Hills State University Major: Religious Education Company: National Airlines \nTanya: Hobby: Badminton School: University of Illinois at Springfield Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: ConverDyn \nJason: Hobby: Badminton School: Mount Senario College Major: Senior High Education Company: Vertex Pharmaceuticals \nCristina: Hobby: Badminton School: Mount Senario College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Exxon \nJosef: Hobby: Curling School: California State University, Northridge Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Concur Technologies\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening, Oliver. Lovely party, isn't it? I must ask, are you by any chance interested in astronomy or slot car racing? Some of my friends are quite into it.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Good evening, Rafael. Indeed, it's a lovely party. I must say, while astronomy and slot cars make intriguing topics, I'm more inclined towards creativity and design. Speaking of which, I find relaxation in the game of badminton. How about you? Do you have any sporty interests?\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Ah, design and creativity, quite fascinating. As for sports, well, I wish I could say I play badminton but I usually spend my time playing chess. It's intriguing how each move can alter the game's path. By the way, mentioning sports reminds me of a friend who is into parkour. Unique, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"Parkour, now that is indeed unique, Rafael. It's surprising how varying interests can bring so much color to our lives. Speaking of which, your game of chess reminds me of the strategic planning we do in architecture. Also, I've a friend who studied Hispanic-American Studies at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee and is now associated with Leonard Green & Partners. Seems like this world is built on intricate networks of connections, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Rafael Cortez said: \"Ah, Hispanic-American Studies, an intriguing field indeed, such great interest in diversity and culture. Your friend really does play an important part in that intricate network you mentioned. Coincidentally, I also know a colleague who studied Hispanic-American Studies, at Weber State University, and now works with Hornbeck Offshore Services. What a small world we live in!\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Weber State University, you say? It's really significant how degrees connect us professionally. Speaking of studies, I'm reminded of another friend who major in Middle Eastern Languages at California State University. She now finds herself working over at Concur Technologies. Do you happen to know anyone from there?\"\n\nTurn #6: Rafael Cortez said: \"Oh, absolutely, Oliver! Middle Eastern languages, also a fascinating field of study, isn't it? It's intriguing that you mentioned California State University, as I know someone who studied Middle Eastern Languages as well, but they've studied at Mount Senario College and working at Exxon now. As you mention Concur Technologies, it turns out that one of my friends, who majored in Biological Specializations at the Valley City State University, works there. Indeed, we are all somehow connected in this world, are we not?\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's marvelous, Rafael! Biology Specializations is indeed a very distinctive field and working in Concur Technologies must be quite enlightening for your friend. Similarly, my friend from Mount Senario College who also majored in Middle Eastern Languages is now at Exxon. It's like you said - our lives are interconnected in the most fascinating of ways. Isn't it extraordinary?\"\n\nTurn #8: Rafael Cortez said: \"Yes, indeed Oliver. It's truly extraordinary how shared friends or even shared interests can create these invisible connections. Just like your friend and mine have this parallel journey: studying Middle Eastern Languages and then working at Exxon. Life can often surprise us with its synchronicity, can't it?\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Thompson said: \"It certainly can, Rafael. Life can indeed be full of such surprising synchronicities. It's these unexpected connections that make our individual experiences so rich and multi-dimensional, don't they?\"\n\nTurn #10: Rafael Cortez said: \"Absolutely, Oliver. Every connection, expected or unexpected, enriches our lives in unique ways. The co-incidence about our friends both studying Middle Eastern Languages and working at Exxon is indeed a striking example of such a surprising connection. It was great having this fascinating conversation with you.\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, Rafael, it was great to find such unexpected parallel connections. Enjoy the rest of the party and hopefully we'll cross paths again. Our discussion reminds me how every interaction and connection adds a unique facet to our lives. Take care!\"\n\nTurn #12: Rafael Cortez said: \"I couldn't agree more, Oliver. After all, we all add to each others\u2019 stories, just like this shared connection of ours. I'm looking forward to potentially more fascinating exchanges in the future. Until then, please enjoy your evening!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Italian Leather Loveseat for $50.0, while another person is showing interest to purchase it. The item is a full-sized loveseat, crafted from Italian leather in a faded burgandy color. It still has the original tags, and the current owner is the first and only owner. The loveseat is in good condition with no rips or tears, and all cushions are well preserved. The leather presents a charming faded look with various small scratches from the owner's cat, adding a touch of ruggedness perfect for a Man Cave. The transaction is strictly cash and carry as the owner does not offer delivery services.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Gwen Pierce\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nGwen Pierce's background: \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: You are the designated buyer for this item and your target price is set at $46.0. If you purchase this item at a significantly higher price than the target, you would face a penalty. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nGwen Pierce's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Well now, 'tis an intriguing piece for sure. How long have ya had it, lass?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Italian Leather Loveseat for $50.0, while another person is showing interest to purchase it. The item is a full-sized loveseat, crafted from Italian leather in a faded burgandy color. It still has the original tags, and the current owner is the first and only owner. The loveseat is in good condition with no rips or tears, and all cushions are well preserved. The leather presents a charming faded look with various small scratches from the owner's cat, adding a touch of ruggedness perfect for a Man Cave. The transaction is strictly cash and carry as the owner does not offer delivery services.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Gwen Pierce\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nGwen Pierce's background: \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: You are the designated buyer for this item and your target price is set at $46.0. If you purchase this item at a significantly higher price than the target, you would face a penalty. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nGwen Pierce's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Well now, 'tis an intriguing piece for sure. How long have ya had it, lass?\"\n\nTurn #1: Gwen Pierce said: \"I've had it for about three years now, Finnegan. In fact, I am the first and only owner. It's been quite a charm in my house and I'm sure it would be in yours too.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Aye, I can tell it's well taken care of, Gwen. The scratches, they're from your cat, I take it? Adds a bit of character to it, it does... would ya be open to discussing the price a touch? Would $46 be agreeable to ya?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Italian Leather Loveseat for $50.0, while another person is showing interest to purchase it. The item is a full-sized loveseat, crafted from Italian leather in a faded burgandy color. It still has the original tags, and the current owner is the first and only owner. The loveseat is in good condition with no rips or tears, and all cushions are well preserved. The leather presents a charming faded look with various small scratches from the owner's cat, adding a touch of ruggedness perfect for a Man Cave. The transaction is strictly cash and carry as the owner does not offer delivery services.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Gwen Pierce\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nGwen Pierce's background: \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: You are the designated buyer for this item and your target price is set at $46.0. If you purchase this item at a significantly higher price than the target, you would face a penalty. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nGwen Pierce's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Well now, 'tis an intriguing piece for sure. How long have ya had it, lass?\"\n\nTurn #1: Gwen Pierce said: \"I've had it for about three years now, Finnegan. In fact, I am the first and only owner. It's been quite a charm in my house and I'm sure it would be in yours too.\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Aye, I can tell it's well taken care of, Gwen. The scratches, they're from your cat, I take it? Adds a bit of character to it, it does... would ya be open to discussing the price a touch? Would $46 be agreeable to ya?\"\n\nTurn #3: Gwen Pierce said: \"Yes, Finnegan, those scratches indeed add a character to it. It's a testament to its durability too as it has withstood my playful cats. About the price, $46 is quite close, but considering its condition and uniqueness, how does $48 sound to you?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ah well, $48 isn't too far off, I suppose. I'll take it for that, Gwen. My lighthouse can use a wee bit of that charm.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Italian Leather Loveseat for $50.0, while another person is showing interest to purchase it. The item is a full-sized loveseat, crafted from Italian leather in a faded burgandy color. It still has the original tags, and the current owner is the first and only owner. The loveseat is in good condition with no rips or tears, and all cushions are well preserved. The leather presents a charming faded look with various small scratches from the owner's cat, adding a touch of ruggedness perfect for a Man Cave. The transaction is strictly cash and carry as the owner does not offer delivery services.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Gwen Pierce\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nGwen Pierce's background: \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: You are the designated buyer for this item and your target price is set at $46.0. If you purchase this item at a significantly higher price than the target, you would face a penalty. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nGwen Pierce's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Well now, 'tis an intriguing piece for sure. How long have ya had it, lass?\"\n\nTurn #1: Gwen Pierce said: \"I've had it for about three years now, Finnegan. In fact, I am the first and only owner. It's been quite a charm in my house and I'm sure it would be in yours too.\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Aye, I can tell it's well taken care of, Gwen. The scratches, they're from your cat, I take it? Adds a bit of character to it, it does... would ya be open to discussing the price a touch? Would $46 be agreeable to ya?\"\n\nTurn #3: Gwen Pierce said: \"Yes, Finnegan, those scratches indeed add a character to it. It's a testament to its durability too as it has withstood my playful cats. About the price, $46 is quite close, but considering its condition and uniqueness, how does $48 sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah well, $48 isn't too far off, I suppose. I'll take it for that, Gwen. My lighthouse can use a wee bit of that charm.\"\n\nTurn #5: Gwen Pierce said: \"That's splendid, Finnegan! I'm sure it will fit right in at your lighthouse. Once the payment is sorted, the loveseat is all yours and ready for you to take home. It's strictly cash and carry, I hope that works for you?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Cash and carry it is then, Gwen. I appreciate your willingness to negotiate. I'll go take care of the payment right away. Looking forward to having this charming piece in my home.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Italian Leather Loveseat for $50.0, while another person is showing interest to purchase it. The item is a full-sized loveseat, crafted from Italian leather in a faded burgandy color. It still has the original tags, and the current owner is the first and only owner. The loveseat is in good condition with no rips or tears, and all cushions are well preserved. The leather presents a charming faded look with various small scratches from the owner's cat, adding a touch of ruggedness perfect for a Man Cave. The transaction is strictly cash and carry as the owner does not offer delivery services.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Gwen Pierce\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nGwen Pierce's background: \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: You are the designated buyer for this item and your target price is set at $46.0. If you purchase this item at a significantly higher price than the target, you would face a penalty. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nGwen Pierce's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Well now, 'tis an intriguing piece for sure. How long have ya had it, lass?\"\n\nTurn #1: Gwen Pierce said: \"I've had it for about three years now, Finnegan. In fact, I am the first and only owner. It's been quite a charm in my house and I'm sure it would be in yours too.\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Aye, I can tell it's well taken care of, Gwen. The scratches, they're from your cat, I take it? Adds a bit of character to it, it does... would ya be open to discussing the price a touch? Would $46 be agreeable to ya?\"\n\nTurn #3: Gwen Pierce said: \"Yes, Finnegan, those scratches indeed add a character to it. It's a testament to its durability too as it has withstood my playful cats. About the price, $46 is quite close, but considering its condition and uniqueness, how does $48 sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah well, $48 isn't too far off, I suppose. I'll take it for that, Gwen. My lighthouse can use a wee bit of that charm.\"\n\nTurn #5: Gwen Pierce said: \"That's splendid, Finnegan! I'm sure it will fit right in at your lighthouse. Once the payment is sorted, the loveseat is all yours and ready for you to take home. It's strictly cash and carry, I hope that works for you?\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Cash and carry it is then, Gwen. I appreciate your willingness to negotiate. I'll go take care of the payment right away. Looking forward to having this charming piece in my home.\"\n\nTurn #7: Gwen Pierce said: \"Perfect, Finnegan! I am certain you'll appreciate its charm in your home. Always a pleasure to negotiate with you. Once the transaction is all sorted, I'll help you load the loveseat. Enjoy your new addition!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Gwen Pierce, your task is to act/speak as Gwen Pierce would, keeping in mind Gwen Pierce's social goal.\nYou can find Gwen Pierce's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Gwen Pierce's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Gwen Pierce's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Italian Leather Loveseat for $50.0, while another person is showing interest to purchase it. The item is a full-sized loveseat, crafted from Italian leather in a faded burgandy color. It still has the original tags, and the current owner is the first and only owner. The loveseat is in good condition with no rips or tears, and all cushions are well preserved. The leather presents a charming faded look with various small scratches from the owner's cat, adding a touch of ruggedness perfect for a Man Cave. The transaction is strictly cash and carry as the owner does not offer delivery services.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Gwen Pierce\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: \nGwen Pierce's background: Gwen Pierce is a 31-year-old female social worker. She/her pronouns. Gwen Pierce, a compassionate social worker, has two adopted cats that she spoils with love. In her spare time, she enjoys knitting and often donates her creations to charity. Personality and values description: Gwen Pierce, imaginative and emotional, deeply values liberty and fairness. She often contemplates before making any decision. Gwen's secrets: She gave up a child for adoption when she was 16.\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nGwen Pierce's goal: You are the seller for this item, with a target price of $26.5. You'll face a penalty if the item is sold significantly below this price. However, if you manage to sell it for more than the target price, a bonus will be your reward.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Well now, 'tis an intriguing piece for sure. How long have ya had it, lass?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I've had it for about three years now, Finnegan. In fact, I am the first and only owner. It's been quite a charm in my house and I'm sure it would be in yours too.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Gwen Pierce, your task is to act/speak as Gwen Pierce would, keeping in mind Gwen Pierce's social goal.\nYou can find Gwen Pierce's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Gwen Pierce's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Gwen Pierce's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Italian Leather Loveseat for $50.0, while another person is showing interest to purchase it. The item is a full-sized loveseat, crafted from Italian leather in a faded burgandy color. It still has the original tags, and the current owner is the first and only owner. The loveseat is in good condition with no rips or tears, and all cushions are well preserved. The leather presents a charming faded look with various small scratches from the owner's cat, adding a touch of ruggedness perfect for a Man Cave. The transaction is strictly cash and carry as the owner does not offer delivery services.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Gwen Pierce\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: \nGwen Pierce's background: Gwen Pierce is a 31-year-old female social worker. She/her pronouns. Gwen Pierce, a compassionate social worker, has two adopted cats that she spoils with love. In her spare time, she enjoys knitting and often donates her creations to charity. Personality and values description: Gwen Pierce, imaginative and emotional, deeply values liberty and fairness. She often contemplates before making any decision. Gwen's secrets: She gave up a child for adoption when she was 16.\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nGwen Pierce's goal: You are the seller for this item, with a target price of $26.5. You'll face a penalty if the item is sold significantly below this price. However, if you manage to sell it for more than the target price, a bonus will be your reward.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Well now, 'tis an intriguing piece for sure. How long have ya had it, lass?\"\n\nTurn #1: Gwen Pierce said: \"I've had it for about three years now, Finnegan. In fact, I am the first and only owner. It's been quite a charm in my house and I'm sure it would be in yours too.\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Aye, I can tell it's well taken care of, Gwen. The scratches, they're from your cat, I take it? Adds a bit of character to it, it does... would ya be open to discussing the price a touch? Would $46 be agreeable to ya?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Yes, Finnegan, those scratches indeed add a character to it. It's a testament to its durability too as it has withstood my playful cats. About the price, $46 is quite close, but considering its condition and uniqueness, how does $48 sound to you?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Gwen Pierce, your task is to act/speak as Gwen Pierce would, keeping in mind Gwen Pierce's social goal.\nYou can find Gwen Pierce's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Gwen Pierce's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Gwen Pierce's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Italian Leather Loveseat for $50.0, while another person is showing interest to purchase it. The item is a full-sized loveseat, crafted from Italian leather in a faded burgandy color. It still has the original tags, and the current owner is the first and only owner. The loveseat is in good condition with no rips or tears, and all cushions are well preserved. The leather presents a charming faded look with various small scratches from the owner's cat, adding a touch of ruggedness perfect for a Man Cave. The transaction is strictly cash and carry as the owner does not offer delivery services.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Gwen Pierce\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: \nGwen Pierce's background: Gwen Pierce is a 31-year-old female social worker. She/her pronouns. Gwen Pierce, a compassionate social worker, has two adopted cats that she spoils with love. In her spare time, she enjoys knitting and often donates her creations to charity. Personality and values description: Gwen Pierce, imaginative and emotional, deeply values liberty and fairness. She often contemplates before making any decision. Gwen's secrets: She gave up a child for adoption when she was 16.\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nGwen Pierce's goal: You are the seller for this item, with a target price of $26.5. You'll face a penalty if the item is sold significantly below this price. However, if you manage to sell it for more than the target price, a bonus will be your reward.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Well now, 'tis an intriguing piece for sure. How long have ya had it, lass?\"\n\nTurn #1: Gwen Pierce said: \"I've had it for about three years now, Finnegan. In fact, I am the first and only owner. It's been quite a charm in my house and I'm sure it would be in yours too.\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Aye, I can tell it's well taken care of, Gwen. The scratches, they're from your cat, I take it? Adds a bit of character to it, it does... would ya be open to discussing the price a touch? Would $46 be agreeable to ya?\"\n\nTurn #3: Gwen Pierce said: \"Yes, Finnegan, those scratches indeed add a character to it. It's a testament to its durability too as it has withstood my playful cats. About the price, $46 is quite close, but considering its condition and uniqueness, how does $48 sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah well, $48 isn't too far off, I suppose. I'll take it for that, Gwen. My lighthouse can use a wee bit of that charm.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's splendid, Finnegan! I'm sure it will fit right in at your lighthouse. Once the payment is sorted, the loveseat is all yours and ready for you to take home. It's strictly cash and carry, I hope that works for you?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Gwen Pierce, your task is to act/speak as Gwen Pierce would, keeping in mind Gwen Pierce's social goal.\nYou can find Gwen Pierce's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Gwen Pierce's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Gwen Pierce's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Italian Leather Loveseat for $50.0, while another person is showing interest to purchase it. The item is a full-sized loveseat, crafted from Italian leather in a faded burgandy color. It still has the original tags, and the current owner is the first and only owner. The loveseat is in good condition with no rips or tears, and all cushions are well preserved. The leather presents a charming faded look with various small scratches from the owner's cat, adding a touch of ruggedness perfect for a Man Cave. The transaction is strictly cash and carry as the owner does not offer delivery services.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Gwen Pierce\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: \nGwen Pierce's background: Gwen Pierce is a 31-year-old female social worker. She/her pronouns. Gwen Pierce, a compassionate social worker, has two adopted cats that she spoils with love. In her spare time, she enjoys knitting and often donates her creations to charity. Personality and values description: Gwen Pierce, imaginative and emotional, deeply values liberty and fairness. She often contemplates before making any decision. Gwen's secrets: She gave up a child for adoption when she was 16.\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nGwen Pierce's goal: You are the seller for this item, with a target price of $26.5. You'll face a penalty if the item is sold significantly below this price. However, if you manage to sell it for more than the target price, a bonus will be your reward.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Well now, 'tis an intriguing piece for sure. How long have ya had it, lass?\"\n\nTurn #1: Gwen Pierce said: \"I've had it for about three years now, Finnegan. In fact, I am the first and only owner. It's been quite a charm in my house and I'm sure it would be in yours too.\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Aye, I can tell it's well taken care of, Gwen. The scratches, they're from your cat, I take it? Adds a bit of character to it, it does... would ya be open to discussing the price a touch? Would $46 be agreeable to ya?\"\n\nTurn #3: Gwen Pierce said: \"Yes, Finnegan, those scratches indeed add a character to it. It's a testament to its durability too as it has withstood my playful cats. About the price, $46 is quite close, but considering its condition and uniqueness, how does $48 sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah well, $48 isn't too far off, I suppose. I'll take it for that, Gwen. My lighthouse can use a wee bit of that charm.\"\n\nTurn #5: Gwen Pierce said: \"That's splendid, Finnegan! I'm sure it will fit right in at your lighthouse. Once the payment is sorted, the loveseat is all yours and ready for you to take home. It's strictly cash and carry, I hope that works for you?\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Cash and carry it is then, Gwen. I appreciate your willingness to negotiate. I'll go take care of the payment right away. Looking forward to having this charming piece in my home.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Perfect, Finnegan! I am certain you'll appreciate its charm in your home. Always a pleasure to negotiate with you. Once the transaction is all sorted, I'll help you load the loveseat. Enjoy your new addition!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Gwen Pierce, your task is to act/speak as Gwen Pierce would, keeping in mind Gwen Pierce's social goal.\nYou can find Gwen Pierce's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Gwen Pierce's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Gwen Pierce's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Italian Leather Loveseat for $50.0, while another person is showing interest to purchase it. The item is a full-sized loveseat, crafted from Italian leather in a faded burgandy color. It still has the original tags, and the current owner is the first and only owner. The loveseat is in good condition with no rips or tears, and all cushions are well preserved. The leather presents a charming faded look with various small scratches from the owner's cat, adding a touch of ruggedness perfect for a Man Cave. The transaction is strictly cash and carry as the owner does not offer delivery services.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Gwen Pierce\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: \nGwen Pierce's background: Gwen Pierce is a 31-year-old female social worker. She/her pronouns. Gwen Pierce, a compassionate social worker, has two adopted cats that she spoils with love. In her spare time, she enjoys knitting and often donates her creations to charity. Personality and values description: Gwen Pierce, imaginative and emotional, deeply values liberty and fairness. She often contemplates before making any decision. Gwen's secrets: She gave up a child for adoption when she was 16.\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nGwen Pierce's goal: You are the seller for this item, with a target price of $26.5. You'll face a penalty if the item is sold significantly below this price. However, if you manage to sell it for more than the target price, a bonus will be your reward.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Well now, 'tis an intriguing piece for sure. How long have ya had it, lass?\"\n\nTurn #1: Gwen Pierce said: \"I've had it for about three years now, Finnegan. In fact, I am the first and only owner. It's been quite a charm in my house and I'm sure it would be in yours too.\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Aye, I can tell it's well taken care of, Gwen. The scratches, they're from your cat, I take it? Adds a bit of character to it, it does... would ya be open to discussing the price a touch? Would $46 be agreeable to ya?\"\n\nTurn #3: Gwen Pierce said: \"Yes, Finnegan, those scratches indeed add a character to it. It's a testament to its durability too as it has withstood my playful cats. About the price, $46 is quite close, but considering its condition and uniqueness, how does $48 sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah well, $48 isn't too far off, I suppose. I'll take it for that, Gwen. My lighthouse can use a wee bit of that charm.\"\n\nTurn #5: Gwen Pierce said: \"That's splendid, Finnegan! I'm sure it will fit right in at your lighthouse. Once the payment is sorted, the loveseat is all yours and ready for you to take home. It's strictly cash and carry, I hope that works for you?\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Cash and carry it is then, Gwen. I appreciate your willingness to negotiate. I'll go take care of the payment right away. Looking forward to having this charming piece in my home.\"\n\nTurn #7: Gwen Pierce said: \"Perfect, Finnegan! I am certain you'll appreciate its charm in your home. Always a pleasure to negotiate with you. Once the transaction is all sorted, I'll help you load the loveseat. Enjoy your new addition!\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Rafael Cortez, your task is to act/speak as Rafael Cortez would, keeping in mind Rafael Cortez's social goal.\nYou can find Rafael Cortez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Rafael Cortez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Rafael Cortez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. Personality and values description: Rafael Cortez, with his outgoing nature and competitive spirit, believes in self-direction. He employs a systematic approach to his decisions. Rafael's secrets: He cheated on his medical school exams.\nOliver Thompson's background: \nRafael Cortez's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMable: School: Sewanee, University of the South Company: BellSouth \nLolita: School: Winona State University Company: ONEOK \nCatherine: School: Utah Valley State College Company: Lincoln Industries \nVita: School: Winona State University Company: Erickson Air-Crane \nBrandon: School: Winona State University Company: The Greenbrier Companies \nDon: School: Clark University Company: MetLife \nAlvin: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Vectren \nTara: School: Kansas Wesleyan University Company: Gentiva Health Services \nArlene: School: Kansas Wesleyan University Company: BellSouth \n\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Good evening, Oliver. As we're both at a party full of professionals, I can't help but wonder if our paths crossed before or at least if we share some mutual connections. Do you, by any chance, have any affiliation with Sewanee University or BellSouth? My good friend Mable is associated with both.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Rafael Cortez, your task is to act/speak as Rafael Cortez would, keeping in mind Rafael Cortez's social goal.\nYou can find Rafael Cortez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Rafael Cortez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Rafael Cortez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. Personality and values description: Rafael Cortez, with his outgoing nature and competitive spirit, believes in self-direction. He employs a systematic approach to his decisions. Rafael's secrets: He cheated on his medical school exams.\nOliver Thompson's background: \nRafael Cortez's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMable: School: Sewanee, University of the South Company: BellSouth \nLolita: School: Winona State University Company: ONEOK \nCatherine: School: Utah Valley State College Company: Lincoln Industries \nVita: School: Winona State University Company: Erickson Air-Crane \nBrandon: School: Winona State University Company: The Greenbrier Companies \nDon: School: Clark University Company: MetLife \nAlvin: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Vectren \nTara: School: Kansas Wesleyan University Company: Gentiva Health Services \nArlene: School: Kansas Wesleyan University Company: BellSouth \n\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening, Oliver. As we're both at a party full of professionals, I can't help but wonder if our paths crossed before or at least if we share some mutual connections. Do you, by any chance, have any affiliation with Sewanee University or BellSouth? My good friend Mable is associated with both.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Good evening, Rafael. That's interesting that you mentioned Sewanee University and BellSouth, both sound familiar to me. As a matter of fact, I have a buddy from school, Dave, who studied at Sewanee and ended up working for BellSouth. Quite a small world, isn't it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, it is a small world after all, Oliver. Quite surprising coincidence with your friend's journey. Now, this might be stretching it a bit, but on another note, does the name Winona State University or the company ONEOK ring any bells? I have another friend Lolita who graduated from there and now works at ONEOK.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Rafael Cortez, your task is to act/speak as Rafael Cortez would, keeping in mind Rafael Cortez's social goal.\nYou can find Rafael Cortez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Rafael Cortez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Rafael Cortez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. Personality and values description: Rafael Cortez, with his outgoing nature and competitive spirit, believes in self-direction. He employs a systematic approach to his decisions. Rafael's secrets: He cheated on his medical school exams.\nOliver Thompson's background: \nRafael Cortez's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMable: School: Sewanee, University of the South Company: BellSouth \nLolita: School: Winona State University Company: ONEOK \nCatherine: School: Utah Valley State College Company: Lincoln Industries \nVita: School: Winona State University Company: Erickson Air-Crane \nBrandon: School: Winona State University Company: The Greenbrier Companies \nDon: School: Clark University Company: MetLife \nAlvin: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Vectren \nTara: School: Kansas Wesleyan University Company: Gentiva Health Services \nArlene: School: Kansas Wesleyan University Company: BellSouth \n\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening, Oliver. As we're both at a party full of professionals, I can't help but wonder if our paths crossed before or at least if we share some mutual connections. Do you, by any chance, have any affiliation with Sewanee University or BellSouth? My good friend Mable is associated with both.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Good evening, Rafael. That's interesting that you mentioned Sewanee University and BellSouth, both sound familiar to me. As a matter of fact, I have a buddy from school, Dave, who studied at Sewanee and ended up working for BellSouth. Quite a small world, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Indeed, it is a small world after all, Oliver. Quite surprising coincidence with your friend's journey. Now, this might be stretching it a bit, but on another note, does the name Winona State University or the company ONEOK ring any bells? I have another friend Lolita who graduated from there and now works at ONEOK.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"I'm afraid Winona State University and ONEOK don't ring a bell to me, Rafael. However, I have friends who studied in other schools and worked at different companies. For instance, I've got friends who studied at Auburn University - Montgomery and some who worked with Estes Industries and Vectren. Do any of those sound familiar?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's quite a spread of affiliations you got there, Oliver. Well, it seems one of them did pique my interest. I happen to know a brilliant individual, Alvin, who studied at Auburn University - Montgomery and now works at Vectren. He's quite remarkable, and I must admit, an excellent chess opponent. Perhaps the world isn't as big as we think, after all.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Rafael Cortez, your task is to act/speak as Rafael Cortez would, keeping in mind Rafael Cortez's social goal.\nYou can find Rafael Cortez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Rafael Cortez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Rafael Cortez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. Personality and values description: Rafael Cortez, with his outgoing nature and competitive spirit, believes in self-direction. He employs a systematic approach to his decisions. Rafael's secrets: He cheated on his medical school exams.\nOliver Thompson's background: \nRafael Cortez's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMable: School: Sewanee, University of the South Company: BellSouth \nLolita: School: Winona State University Company: ONEOK \nCatherine: School: Utah Valley State College Company: Lincoln Industries \nVita: School: Winona State University Company: Erickson Air-Crane \nBrandon: School: Winona State University Company: The Greenbrier Companies \nDon: School: Clark University Company: MetLife \nAlvin: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Vectren \nTara: School: Kansas Wesleyan University Company: Gentiva Health Services \nArlene: School: Kansas Wesleyan University Company: BellSouth \n\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening, Oliver. As we're both at a party full of professionals, I can't help but wonder if our paths crossed before or at least if we share some mutual connections. Do you, by any chance, have any affiliation with Sewanee University or BellSouth? My good friend Mable is associated with both.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Good evening, Rafael. That's interesting that you mentioned Sewanee University and BellSouth, both sound familiar to me. As a matter of fact, I have a buddy from school, Dave, who studied at Sewanee and ended up working for BellSouth. Quite a small world, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Indeed, it is a small world after all, Oliver. Quite surprising coincidence with your friend's journey. Now, this might be stretching it a bit, but on another note, does the name Winona State University or the company ONEOK ring any bells? I have another friend Lolita who graduated from there and now works at ONEOK.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"I'm afraid Winona State University and ONEOK don't ring a bell to me, Rafael. However, I have friends who studied in other schools and worked at different companies. For instance, I've got friends who studied at Auburn University - Montgomery and some who worked with Estes Industries and Vectren. Do any of those sound familiar?\"\n\nTurn #4: Rafael Cortez said: \"That's quite a spread of affiliations you got there, Oliver. Well, it seems one of them did pique my interest. I happen to know a brilliant individual, Alvin, who studied at Auburn University - Montgomery and now works at Vectren. He's quite remarkable, and I must admit, an excellent chess opponent. Perhaps the world isn't as big as we think, after all.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's incredible! I also know Alvin, from his Auburn days. As for his chess skills, I'm not surprised - he always had a strategic mind. It's truly a small world after all. Out of curiosity, do you also happen to know anyone from Coe College or working at Sequoia Capital? I have a few acquaintances there.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"It seems we may not share those circles, I don't have any connections with Coe College or Sequoia Capital. But it's been quite enlightening discovering our connections, Oliver. I guess it\u2019s just proof of how intertwined our lives can be, especially in our professions.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Rafael Cortez, your task is to act/speak as Rafael Cortez would, keeping in mind Rafael Cortez's social goal.\nYou can find Rafael Cortez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Rafael Cortez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Rafael Cortez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. Personality and values description: Rafael Cortez, with his outgoing nature and competitive spirit, believes in self-direction. He employs a systematic approach to his decisions. Rafael's secrets: He cheated on his medical school exams.\nOliver Thompson's background: \nRafael Cortez's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMable: School: Sewanee, University of the South Company: BellSouth \nLolita: School: Winona State University Company: ONEOK \nCatherine: School: Utah Valley State College Company: Lincoln Industries \nVita: School: Winona State University Company: Erickson Air-Crane \nBrandon: School: Winona State University Company: The Greenbrier Companies \nDon: School: Clark University Company: MetLife \nAlvin: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Vectren \nTara: School: Kansas Wesleyan University Company: Gentiva Health Services \nArlene: School: Kansas Wesleyan University Company: BellSouth \n\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening, Oliver. As we're both at a party full of professionals, I can't help but wonder if our paths crossed before or at least if we share some mutual connections. Do you, by any chance, have any affiliation with Sewanee University or BellSouth? My good friend Mable is associated with both.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Good evening, Rafael. That's interesting that you mentioned Sewanee University and BellSouth, both sound familiar to me. As a matter of fact, I have a buddy from school, Dave, who studied at Sewanee and ended up working for BellSouth. Quite a small world, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Indeed, it is a small world after all, Oliver. Quite surprising coincidence with your friend's journey. Now, this might be stretching it a bit, but on another note, does the name Winona State University or the company ONEOK ring any bells? I have another friend Lolita who graduated from there and now works at ONEOK.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"I'm afraid Winona State University and ONEOK don't ring a bell to me, Rafael. However, I have friends who studied in other schools and worked at different companies. For instance, I've got friends who studied at Auburn University - Montgomery and some who worked with Estes Industries and Vectren. Do any of those sound familiar?\"\n\nTurn #4: Rafael Cortez said: \"That's quite a spread of affiliations you got there, Oliver. Well, it seems one of them did pique my interest. I happen to know a brilliant individual, Alvin, who studied at Auburn University - Montgomery and now works at Vectren. He's quite remarkable, and I must admit, an excellent chess opponent. Perhaps the world isn't as big as we think, after all.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's incredible! I also know Alvin, from his Auburn days. As for his chess skills, I'm not surprised - he always had a strategic mind. It's truly a small world after all. Out of curiosity, do you also happen to know anyone from Coe College or working at Sequoia Capital? I have a few acquaintances there.\"\n\nTurn #6: Rafael Cortez said: \"It seems we may not share those circles, I don't have any connections with Coe College or Sequoia Capital. But it's been quite enlightening discovering our connections, Oliver. I guess it\u2019s just proof of how intertwined our lives can be, especially in our professions.\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, Rafael. Interactions like these really reinstates how interconnected our lives can be. It's been a pleasure sharing these surprises with you. Thank you for the engaging conversation!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Absolutely, Oliver. Conversations like these indeed highlight the fascinating interweaving of our lives. It was a pleasure to uncover these connections with you as well. Thank you for this engaging conversation, and enjoy the rest of the party!'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Rafael Cortez, your task is to act/speak as Rafael Cortez would, keeping in mind Rafael Cortez's social goal.\nYou can find Rafael Cortez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Rafael Cortez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Rafael Cortez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. Personality and values description: Rafael Cortez, with his outgoing nature and competitive spirit, believes in self-direction. He employs a systematic approach to his decisions. Rafael's secrets: He cheated on his medical school exams.\nOliver Thompson's background: \nRafael Cortez's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMable: School: Sewanee, University of the South Company: BellSouth \nLolita: School: Winona State University Company: ONEOK \nCatherine: School: Utah Valley State College Company: Lincoln Industries \nVita: School: Winona State University Company: Erickson Air-Crane \nBrandon: School: Winona State University Company: The Greenbrier Companies \nDon: School: Clark University Company: MetLife \nAlvin: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Vectren \nTara: School: Kansas Wesleyan University Company: Gentiva Health Services \nArlene: School: Kansas Wesleyan University Company: BellSouth \n\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening, Oliver. As we're both at a party full of professionals, I can't help but wonder if our paths crossed before or at least if we share some mutual connections. Do you, by any chance, have any affiliation with Sewanee University or BellSouth? My good friend Mable is associated with both.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Good evening, Rafael. That's interesting that you mentioned Sewanee University and BellSouth, both sound familiar to me. As a matter of fact, I have a buddy from school, Dave, who studied at Sewanee and ended up working for BellSouth. Quite a small world, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Indeed, it is a small world after all, Oliver. Quite surprising coincidence with your friend's journey. Now, this might be stretching it a bit, but on another note, does the name Winona State University or the company ONEOK ring any bells? I have another friend Lolita who graduated from there and now works at ONEOK.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"I'm afraid Winona State University and ONEOK don't ring a bell to me, Rafael. However, I have friends who studied in other schools and worked at different companies. For instance, I've got friends who studied at Auburn University - Montgomery and some who worked with Estes Industries and Vectren. Do any of those sound familiar?\"\n\nTurn #4: Rafael Cortez said: \"That's quite a spread of affiliations you got there, Oliver. Well, it seems one of them did pique my interest. I happen to know a brilliant individual, Alvin, who studied at Auburn University - Montgomery and now works at Vectren. He's quite remarkable, and I must admit, an excellent chess opponent. Perhaps the world isn't as big as we think, after all.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's incredible! I also know Alvin, from his Auburn days. As for his chess skills, I'm not surprised - he always had a strategic mind. It's truly a small world after all. Out of curiosity, do you also happen to know anyone from Coe College or working at Sequoia Capital? I have a few acquaintances there.\"\n\nTurn #6: Rafael Cortez said: \"It seems we may not share those circles, I don't have any connections with Coe College or Sequoia Capital. But it's been quite enlightening discovering our connections, Oliver. I guess it\u2019s just proof of how intertwined our lives can be, especially in our professions.\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, Rafael. Interactions like these really reinstates how interconnected our lives can be. It's been a pleasure sharing these surprises with you. Thank you for the engaging conversation!\"\n\nTurn #8: Rafael Cortez said: \"Absolutely, Oliver. Conversations like these indeed highlight the fascinating interweaving of our lives. It was a pleasure to uncover these connections with you as well. Thank you for this engaging conversation, and enjoy the rest of the party!\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Thompson left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nRafael Cortez's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDave: School: Sewanee, University of the South Company: BellSouth \nTimothy: School: Louisiana State University Company: BellSouth \nLeona: School: Coe College Company: Franklin Templeton \nAlvin: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Vectren \nKarissa: School: Saint John's University Company: U.S. Venture Partners \nStephanie: School: Coe College Company: Sequoia Capital \nKathy: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Estes Industries \nMonica: School: Coe College Company: The Greenbrier Companies \nBlanche: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Oakley, Inc.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening, Oliver. As we're both at a party full of professionals, I can't help but wonder if our paths crossed before or at least if we share some mutual connections. Do you, by any chance, have any affiliation with Sewanee University or BellSouth? My good friend Mable is associated with both.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Good evening, Rafael. That's interesting that you mentioned Sewanee University and BellSouth, both sound familiar to me. As a matter of fact, I have a buddy from school, Dave, who studied at Sewanee and ended up working for BellSouth. Quite a small world, isn't it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nRafael Cortez's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDave: School: Sewanee, University of the South Company: BellSouth \nTimothy: School: Louisiana State University Company: BellSouth \nLeona: School: Coe College Company: Franklin Templeton \nAlvin: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Vectren \nKarissa: School: Saint John's University Company: U.S. Venture Partners \nStephanie: School: Coe College Company: Sequoia Capital \nKathy: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Estes Industries \nMonica: School: Coe College Company: The Greenbrier Companies \nBlanche: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Oakley, Inc.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening, Oliver. As we're both at a party full of professionals, I can't help but wonder if our paths crossed before or at least if we share some mutual connections. Do you, by any chance, have any affiliation with Sewanee University or BellSouth? My good friend Mable is associated with both.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Good evening, Rafael. That's interesting that you mentioned Sewanee University and BellSouth, both sound familiar to me. As a matter of fact, I have a buddy from school, Dave, who studied at Sewanee and ended up working for BellSouth. Quite a small world, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Indeed, it is a small world after all, Oliver. Quite surprising coincidence with your friend's journey. Now, this might be stretching it a bit, but on another note, does the name Winona State University or the company ONEOK ring any bells? I have another friend Lolita who graduated from there and now works at ONEOK.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm afraid Winona State University and ONEOK don't ring a bell to me, Rafael. However, I have friends who studied in other schools and worked at different companies. For instance, I've got friends who studied at Auburn University - Montgomery and some who worked with Estes Industries and Vectren. Do any of those sound familiar?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nRafael Cortez's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDave: School: Sewanee, University of the South Company: BellSouth \nTimothy: School: Louisiana State University Company: BellSouth \nLeona: School: Coe College Company: Franklin Templeton \nAlvin: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Vectren \nKarissa: School: Saint John's University Company: U.S. Venture Partners \nStephanie: School: Coe College Company: Sequoia Capital \nKathy: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Estes Industries \nMonica: School: Coe College Company: The Greenbrier Companies \nBlanche: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Oakley, Inc.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening, Oliver. As we're both at a party full of professionals, I can't help but wonder if our paths crossed before or at least if we share some mutual connections. Do you, by any chance, have any affiliation with Sewanee University or BellSouth? My good friend Mable is associated with both.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Good evening, Rafael. That's interesting that you mentioned Sewanee University and BellSouth, both sound familiar to me. As a matter of fact, I have a buddy from school, Dave, who studied at Sewanee and ended up working for BellSouth. Quite a small world, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Indeed, it is a small world after all, Oliver. Quite surprising coincidence with your friend's journey. Now, this might be stretching it a bit, but on another note, does the name Winona State University or the company ONEOK ring any bells? I have another friend Lolita who graduated from there and now works at ONEOK.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"I'm afraid Winona State University and ONEOK don't ring a bell to me, Rafael. However, I have friends who studied in other schools and worked at different companies. For instance, I've got friends who studied at Auburn University - Montgomery and some who worked with Estes Industries and Vectren. Do any of those sound familiar?\"\n\nTurn #4: Rafael Cortez said: \"That's quite a spread of affiliations you got there, Oliver. Well, it seems one of them did pique my interest. I happen to know a brilliant individual, Alvin, who studied at Auburn University - Montgomery and now works at Vectren. He's quite remarkable, and I must admit, an excellent chess opponent. Perhaps the world isn't as big as we think, after all.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's incredible! I also know Alvin, from his Auburn days. As for his chess skills, I'm not surprised - he always had a strategic mind. It's truly a small world after all. Out of curiosity, do you also happen to know anyone from Coe College or working at Sequoia Capital? I have a few acquaintances there.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nRafael Cortez's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDave: School: Sewanee, University of the South Company: BellSouth \nTimothy: School: Louisiana State University Company: BellSouth \nLeona: School: Coe College Company: Franklin Templeton \nAlvin: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Vectren \nKarissa: School: Saint John's University Company: U.S. Venture Partners \nStephanie: School: Coe College Company: Sequoia Capital \nKathy: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Estes Industries \nMonica: School: Coe College Company: The Greenbrier Companies \nBlanche: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Oakley, Inc.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening, Oliver. As we're both at a party full of professionals, I can't help but wonder if our paths crossed before or at least if we share some mutual connections. Do you, by any chance, have any affiliation with Sewanee University or BellSouth? My good friend Mable is associated with both.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Good evening, Rafael. That's interesting that you mentioned Sewanee University and BellSouth, both sound familiar to me. As a matter of fact, I have a buddy from school, Dave, who studied at Sewanee and ended up working for BellSouth. Quite a small world, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Indeed, it is a small world after all, Oliver. Quite surprising coincidence with your friend's journey. Now, this might be stretching it a bit, but on another note, does the name Winona State University or the company ONEOK ring any bells? I have another friend Lolita who graduated from there and now works at ONEOK.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"I'm afraid Winona State University and ONEOK don't ring a bell to me, Rafael. However, I have friends who studied in other schools and worked at different companies. For instance, I've got friends who studied at Auburn University - Montgomery and some who worked with Estes Industries and Vectren. Do any of those sound familiar?\"\n\nTurn #4: Rafael Cortez said: \"That's quite a spread of affiliations you got there, Oliver. Well, it seems one of them did pique my interest. I happen to know a brilliant individual, Alvin, who studied at Auburn University - Montgomery and now works at Vectren. He's quite remarkable, and I must admit, an excellent chess opponent. Perhaps the world isn't as big as we think, after all.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's incredible! I also know Alvin, from his Auburn days. As for his chess skills, I'm not surprised - he always had a strategic mind. It's truly a small world after all. Out of curiosity, do you also happen to know anyone from Coe College or working at Sequoia Capital? I have a few acquaintances there.\"\n\nTurn #6: Rafael Cortez said: \"It seems we may not share those circles, I don't have any connections with Coe College or Sequoia Capital. But it's been quite enlightening discovering our connections, Oliver. I guess it\u2019s just proof of how intertwined our lives can be, especially in our professions.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, Rafael. Interactions like these really reinstates how interconnected our lives can be. It's been a pleasure sharing these surprises with you. Thank you for the engaging conversation!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nRafael Cortez's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDave: School: Sewanee, University of the South Company: BellSouth \nTimothy: School: Louisiana State University Company: BellSouth \nLeona: School: Coe College Company: Franklin Templeton \nAlvin: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Vectren \nKarissa: School: Saint John's University Company: U.S. Venture Partners \nStephanie: School: Coe College Company: Sequoia Capital \nKathy: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Estes Industries \nMonica: School: Coe College Company: The Greenbrier Companies \nBlanche: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Oakley, Inc.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening, Oliver. As we're both at a party full of professionals, I can't help but wonder if our paths crossed before or at least if we share some mutual connections. Do you, by any chance, have any affiliation with Sewanee University or BellSouth? My good friend Mable is associated with both.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Good evening, Rafael. That's interesting that you mentioned Sewanee University and BellSouth, both sound familiar to me. As a matter of fact, I have a buddy from school, Dave, who studied at Sewanee and ended up working for BellSouth. Quite a small world, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Indeed, it is a small world after all, Oliver. Quite surprising coincidence with your friend's journey. Now, this might be stretching it a bit, but on another note, does the name Winona State University or the company ONEOK ring any bells? I have another friend Lolita who graduated from there and now works at ONEOK.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"I'm afraid Winona State University and ONEOK don't ring a bell to me, Rafael. However, I have friends who studied in other schools and worked at different companies. For instance, I've got friends who studied at Auburn University - Montgomery and some who worked with Estes Industries and Vectren. Do any of those sound familiar?\"\n\nTurn #4: Rafael Cortez said: \"That's quite a spread of affiliations you got there, Oliver. Well, it seems one of them did pique my interest. I happen to know a brilliant individual, Alvin, who studied at Auburn University - Montgomery and now works at Vectren. He's quite remarkable, and I must admit, an excellent chess opponent. Perhaps the world isn't as big as we think, after all.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's incredible! I also know Alvin, from his Auburn days. As for his chess skills, I'm not surprised - he always had a strategic mind. It's truly a small world after all. Out of curiosity, do you also happen to know anyone from Coe College or working at Sequoia Capital? I have a few acquaintances there.\"\n\nTurn #6: Rafael Cortez said: \"It seems we may not share those circles, I don't have any connections with Coe College or Sequoia Capital. But it's been quite enlightening discovering our connections, Oliver. I guess it\u2019s just proof of how intertwined our lives can be, especially in our professions.\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, Rafael. Interactions like these really reinstates how interconnected our lives can be. It's been a pleasure sharing these surprises with you. Thank you for the engaging conversation!\"\n\nTurn #8: Rafael Cortez said: \"Absolutely, Oliver. Conversations like these indeed highlight the fascinating interweaving of our lives. It was a pleasure to uncover these connections with you as well. Thank you for this engaging conversation, and enjoy the rest of the party!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: William Brown and Ava Martinez\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nAva Martinez's background: \nWilliam Brown's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDavid: Hobby: Vacation Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nChristopher: Hobby: Go Company: McKinsey & Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nLee: Hobby: Go Company: Groupon Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPamela: Hobby: Watching television Company: General Cable Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nPhillip: Hobby: Kayaking Company: Sauer-Danfoss Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nKristin: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nRafael: Hobby: Kayaking Company: General Cable Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nChad: Hobby: Foreign language learning Company: General Cable Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPhil: Hobby: Kayaking Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nConnie: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: General Cable Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nTommy: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \n\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: William Brown said: \"Hello Ava, nice to meet you! I'm William, a local chef who loves trying out new recipes. Do you also enjoy exploring local food scenes or do you prefer any particular cuisine?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hi William, nice to meet you. I'm Ava. I do enjoy exploring local cuisines, especially if they reflect the culture and history of their place of origin. As a student, I'm always searching for new experiences. Speaking of new experiences, do you enjoy any outdoor activities in the morning? Some of my friends really appreciate that sort of engagement, like foraging or weightlifting, for instance.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Outdoor activities in the morning, you say? One of my friends, Rafael, actually enjoys kayaking early in the day. Different timings for different folks, I guess. I'm more of a night person myself. Now, speaking of cultures and history, have you heard of the 'Go' game? Some executives I know from various companies like playing it during evening gatherings. I always thought it reflected a part of Asia's rich history.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: William Brown and Ava Martinez\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nAva Martinez's background: \nWilliam Brown's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDavid: Hobby: Vacation Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nChristopher: Hobby: Go Company: McKinsey & Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nLee: Hobby: Go Company: Groupon Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPamela: Hobby: Watching television Company: General Cable Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nPhillip: Hobby: Kayaking Company: Sauer-Danfoss Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nKristin: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nRafael: Hobby: Kayaking Company: General Cable Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nChad: Hobby: Foreign language learning Company: General Cable Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPhil: Hobby: Kayaking Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nConnie: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: General Cable Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nTommy: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \n\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hello Ava, nice to meet you! I'm William, a local chef who loves trying out new recipes. Do you also enjoy exploring local food scenes or do you prefer any particular cuisine?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: William Brown and Ava Martinez\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nAva Martinez's background: \nWilliam Brown's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDavid: Hobby: Vacation Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nChristopher: Hobby: Go Company: McKinsey & Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nLee: Hobby: Go Company: Groupon Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPamela: Hobby: Watching television Company: General Cable Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nPhillip: Hobby: Kayaking Company: Sauer-Danfoss Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nKristin: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nRafael: Hobby: Kayaking Company: General Cable Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nChad: Hobby: Foreign language learning Company: General Cable Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPhil: Hobby: Kayaking Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nConnie: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: General Cable Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nTommy: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \n\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: William Brown said: \"Hello Ava, nice to meet you! I'm William, a local chef who loves trying out new recipes. Do you also enjoy exploring local food scenes or do you prefer any particular cuisine?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hi William, nice to meet you. I'm Ava. I do enjoy exploring local cuisines, especially if they reflect the culture and history of their place of origin. As a student, I'm always searching for new experiences. Speaking of new experiences, do you enjoy any outdoor activities in the morning? Some of my friends really appreciate that sort of engagement, like foraging or weightlifting, for instance.\"\n\nTurn #2: William Brown said: \"Outdoor activities in the morning, you say? One of my friends, Rafael, actually enjoys kayaking early in the day. Different timings for different folks, I guess. I'm more of a night person myself. Now, speaking of cultures and history, have you heard of the 'Go' game? Some executives I know from various companies like playing it during evening gatherings. I always thought it reflected a part of Asia's rich history.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Interesting, Rafael must have a really unique experience doing kayaking that early. As for the 'Go' game, I haven't played it yet, but it sounds very strategic and engaging. I also know some people who work at different companies that enjoy indoor gaming in the afternoon, much like your exec friends enjoy their evening gatherings. By the way, have you ever tried foraging? Some of my friends who work in different sectors, from travel companies to construction, find it a refreshing morning hobby.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I suppose early birds like your friends and Rafael have something in common with enjoying their hobbies in the morning, even if the activities are different like foraging and kayaking. And yes, 'Go' is definitely a strategic game that tells a lot about the culture it originates from. Speaking of indoor games and different sectors, I have a friend named Pamela, she's an avid television watcher and works for General Cable. She enjoys spending her afternoons indoors, maybe something your friends would find common ground with. \"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: William Brown and Ava Martinez\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nAva Martinez's background: \nWilliam Brown's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDavid: Hobby: Vacation Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nChristopher: Hobby: Go Company: McKinsey & Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nLee: Hobby: Go Company: Groupon Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPamela: Hobby: Watching television Company: General Cable Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nPhillip: Hobby: Kayaking Company: Sauer-Danfoss Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nKristin: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nRafael: Hobby: Kayaking Company: General Cable Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nChad: Hobby: Foreign language learning Company: General Cable Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPhil: Hobby: Kayaking Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nConnie: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: General Cable Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nTommy: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \n\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: William Brown said: \"Hello Ava, nice to meet you! I'm William, a local chef who loves trying out new recipes. Do you also enjoy exploring local food scenes or do you prefer any particular cuisine?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hi William, nice to meet you. I'm Ava. I do enjoy exploring local cuisines, especially if they reflect the culture and history of their place of origin. As a student, I'm always searching for new experiences. Speaking of new experiences, do you enjoy any outdoor activities in the morning? Some of my friends really appreciate that sort of engagement, like foraging or weightlifting, for instance.\"\n\nTurn #2: William Brown said: \"Outdoor activities in the morning, you say? One of my friends, Rafael, actually enjoys kayaking early in the day. Different timings for different folks, I guess. I'm more of a night person myself. Now, speaking of cultures and history, have you heard of the 'Go' game? Some executives I know from various companies like playing it during evening gatherings. I always thought it reflected a part of Asia's rich history.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Interesting, Rafael must have a really unique experience doing kayaking that early. As for the 'Go' game, I haven't played it yet, but it sounds very strategic and engaging. I also know some people who work at different companies that enjoy indoor gaming in the afternoon, much like your exec friends enjoy their evening gatherings. By the way, have you ever tried foraging? Some of my friends who work in different sectors, from travel companies to construction, find it a refreshing morning hobby.\"\n\nTurn #4: William Brown said: \"I suppose early birds like your friends and Rafael have something in common with enjoying their hobbies in the morning, even if the activities are different like foraging and kayaking. And yes, 'Go' is definitely a strategic game that tells a lot about the culture it originates from. Speaking of indoor games and different sectors, I have a friend named Pamela, she's an avid television watcher and works for General Cable. She enjoys spending her afternoons indoors, maybe something your friends would find common ground with. \"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"It's funny how people enjoy their downtime in different ways, isn't it? Your friend Pamela and some of my friends might enjoy a fascinating conversation about their indoor afternoon hobbies. Some of my other friends, particularly one who works for Union Bank, loves motoring, which is quite an thrilling outdoor activity. Do you happen to know anyone who's into motor sports?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Isn't it? The way we choose to spend our free time really says a lot about us. Motor sports, huh? Now that's adventurous! I don't have any friends who are into motor sports but I know a few who are really into kayaking. Speaking of exciting activities, do you or any of your friends find interest in learning foreign languages? Because my friend Chad, who also works at General Cable, loves it. He usually enjoys this indoor activity in the evenings.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: William Brown and Ava Martinez\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nAva Martinez's background: \nWilliam Brown's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDavid: Hobby: Vacation Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nChristopher: Hobby: Go Company: McKinsey & Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nLee: Hobby: Go Company: Groupon Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPamela: Hobby: Watching television Company: General Cable Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nPhillip: Hobby: Kayaking Company: Sauer-Danfoss Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nKristin: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nRafael: Hobby: Kayaking Company: General Cable Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nChad: Hobby: Foreign language learning Company: General Cable Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPhil: Hobby: Kayaking Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nConnie: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: General Cable Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nTommy: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \n\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: William Brown said: \"Hello Ava, nice to meet you! I'm William, a local chef who loves trying out new recipes. Do you also enjoy exploring local food scenes or do you prefer any particular cuisine?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hi William, nice to meet you. I'm Ava. I do enjoy exploring local cuisines, especially if they reflect the culture and history of their place of origin. As a student, I'm always searching for new experiences. Speaking of new experiences, do you enjoy any outdoor activities in the morning? Some of my friends really appreciate that sort of engagement, like foraging or weightlifting, for instance.\"\n\nTurn #2: William Brown said: \"Outdoor activities in the morning, you say? One of my friends, Rafael, actually enjoys kayaking early in the day. Different timings for different folks, I guess. I'm more of a night person myself. Now, speaking of cultures and history, have you heard of the 'Go' game? Some executives I know from various companies like playing it during evening gatherings. I always thought it reflected a part of Asia's rich history.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Interesting, Rafael must have a really unique experience doing kayaking that early. As for the 'Go' game, I haven't played it yet, but it sounds very strategic and engaging. I also know some people who work at different companies that enjoy indoor gaming in the afternoon, much like your exec friends enjoy their evening gatherings. By the way, have you ever tried foraging? Some of my friends who work in different sectors, from travel companies to construction, find it a refreshing morning hobby.\"\n\nTurn #4: William Brown said: \"I suppose early birds like your friends and Rafael have something in common with enjoying their hobbies in the morning, even if the activities are different like foraging and kayaking. And yes, 'Go' is definitely a strategic game that tells a lot about the culture it originates from. Speaking of indoor games and different sectors, I have a friend named Pamela, she's an avid television watcher and works for General Cable. She enjoys spending her afternoons indoors, maybe something your friends would find common ground with. \"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"It's funny how people enjoy their downtime in different ways, isn't it? Your friend Pamela and some of my friends might enjoy a fascinating conversation about their indoor afternoon hobbies. Some of my other friends, particularly one who works for Union Bank, loves motoring, which is quite an thrilling outdoor activity. Do you happen to know anyone who's into motor sports?\"\n\nTurn #6: William Brown said: \"Isn't it? The way we choose to spend our free time really says a lot about us. Motor sports, huh? Now that's adventurous! I don't have any friends who are into motor sports but I know a few who are really into kayaking. Speaking of exciting activities, do you or any of your friends find interest in learning foreign languages? Because my friend Chad, who also works at General Cable, loves it. He usually enjoys this indoor activity in the evenings.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Learning foreign languages does sound interesting! Speaking of indoor evening activities, I know someone named Robin who enjoys gaming during those hours. But hey, dabbling in different hobbies often brings its own kind of joy, right? Like lace-making, something my friend Tina from Groupon enjoys. Say, William, do you by any chance know someone who's into crafts like that?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Lace-making, that's intriguing! While I do know a friend who works at Groupon, his hobby is the 'Go' game rather than crafts. Let's see who else... Ah, I have a friend named Kristin, who works at H. J. Heinz Company and she's an animal fan, not exactly crafts but it shows similar patience and love for details. What about you Ava, or your friends, any interest in animals or nature?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: William Brown and Ava Martinez\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nAva Martinez's background: \nWilliam Brown's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDavid: Hobby: Vacation Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nChristopher: Hobby: Go Company: McKinsey & Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nLee: Hobby: Go Company: Groupon Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPamela: Hobby: Watching television Company: General Cable Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nPhillip: Hobby: Kayaking Company: Sauer-Danfoss Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nKristin: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nRafael: Hobby: Kayaking Company: General Cable Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nChad: Hobby: Foreign language learning Company: General Cable Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPhil: Hobby: Kayaking Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nConnie: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: General Cable Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nTommy: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \n\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: William Brown said: \"Hello Ava, nice to meet you! I'm William, a local chef who loves trying out new recipes. Do you also enjoy exploring local food scenes or do you prefer any particular cuisine?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hi William, nice to meet you. I'm Ava. I do enjoy exploring local cuisines, especially if they reflect the culture and history of their place of origin. As a student, I'm always searching for new experiences. Speaking of new experiences, do you enjoy any outdoor activities in the morning? Some of my friends really appreciate that sort of engagement, like foraging or weightlifting, for instance.\"\n\nTurn #2: William Brown said: \"Outdoor activities in the morning, you say? One of my friends, Rafael, actually enjoys kayaking early in the day. Different timings for different folks, I guess. I'm more of a night person myself. Now, speaking of cultures and history, have you heard of the 'Go' game? Some executives I know from various companies like playing it during evening gatherings. I always thought it reflected a part of Asia's rich history.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Interesting, Rafael must have a really unique experience doing kayaking that early. As for the 'Go' game, I haven't played it yet, but it sounds very strategic and engaging. I also know some people who work at different companies that enjoy indoor gaming in the afternoon, much like your exec friends enjoy their evening gatherings. By the way, have you ever tried foraging? Some of my friends who work in different sectors, from travel companies to construction, find it a refreshing morning hobby.\"\n\nTurn #4: William Brown said: \"I suppose early birds like your friends and Rafael have something in common with enjoying their hobbies in the morning, even if the activities are different like foraging and kayaking. And yes, 'Go' is definitely a strategic game that tells a lot about the culture it originates from. Speaking of indoor games and different sectors, I have a friend named Pamela, she's an avid television watcher and works for General Cable. She enjoys spending her afternoons indoors, maybe something your friends would find common ground with. \"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"It's funny how people enjoy their downtime in different ways, isn't it? Your friend Pamela and some of my friends might enjoy a fascinating conversation about their indoor afternoon hobbies. Some of my other friends, particularly one who works for Union Bank, loves motoring, which is quite an thrilling outdoor activity. Do you happen to know anyone who's into motor sports?\"\n\nTurn #6: William Brown said: \"Isn't it? The way we choose to spend our free time really says a lot about us. Motor sports, huh? Now that's adventurous! I don't have any friends who are into motor sports but I know a few who are really into kayaking. Speaking of exciting activities, do you or any of your friends find interest in learning foreign languages? Because my friend Chad, who also works at General Cable, loves it. He usually enjoys this indoor activity in the evenings.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Learning foreign languages does sound interesting! Speaking of indoor evening activities, I know someone named Robin who enjoys gaming during those hours. But hey, dabbling in different hobbies often brings its own kind of joy, right? Like lace-making, something my friend Tina from Groupon enjoys. Say, William, do you by any chance know someone who's into crafts like that?\"\n\nTurn #8: William Brown said: \"Lace-making, that's intriguing! While I do know a friend who works at Groupon, his hobby is the 'Go' game rather than crafts. Let's see who else... Ah, I have a friend named Kristin, who works at H. J. Heinz Company and she's an animal fan, not exactly crafts but it shows similar patience and love for details. What about you Ava, or your friends, any interest in animals or nature?\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"That's a great point, William. Interests in nature and animal surely require patience and attention to the details, much like crafts. One of my friends, Raymond, certainly shares that perspective, as he's always out foraging early in the morning. It's his unique way of connecting with nature. However, I personally spend my free time with creative activities, like drawing and writing poetry. But, speaking of attention to detail, do you know anyone who is into gaming? A friend of mine, Scott from Expedia, appreciates the strategic thinking required in it.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ah, gaming. Now that is a hobby that requires strategic thinking. It reminds me of my friends who enjoy the 'Go' game. I've yet to find the right game for myself though. Artistic activities like your drawing and poetry also speak volumes about attention to detail. So, do you have friends who work at specific companies, Ava? Maybe at H.J. Heinz Company or General Cable perhaps?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: William Brown and Ava Martinez\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nAva Martinez's background: \nWilliam Brown's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDavid: Hobby: Vacation Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nChristopher: Hobby: Go Company: McKinsey & Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nLee: Hobby: Go Company: Groupon Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPamela: Hobby: Watching television Company: General Cable Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nPhillip: Hobby: Kayaking Company: Sauer-Danfoss Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nKristin: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nRafael: Hobby: Kayaking Company: General Cable Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nChad: Hobby: Foreign language learning Company: General Cable Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPhil: Hobby: Kayaking Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nConnie: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: General Cable Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nTommy: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \n\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: William Brown said: \"Hello Ava, nice to meet you! I'm William, a local chef who loves trying out new recipes. Do you also enjoy exploring local food scenes or do you prefer any particular cuisine?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hi William, nice to meet you. I'm Ava. I do enjoy exploring local cuisines, especially if they reflect the culture and history of their place of origin. As a student, I'm always searching for new experiences. Speaking of new experiences, do you enjoy any outdoor activities in the morning? Some of my friends really appreciate that sort of engagement, like foraging or weightlifting, for instance.\"\n\nTurn #2: William Brown said: \"Outdoor activities in the morning, you say? One of my friends, Rafael, actually enjoys kayaking early in the day. Different timings for different folks, I guess. I'm more of a night person myself. Now, speaking of cultures and history, have you heard of the 'Go' game? Some executives I know from various companies like playing it during evening gatherings. I always thought it reflected a part of Asia's rich history.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Interesting, Rafael must have a really unique experience doing kayaking that early. As for the 'Go' game, I haven't played it yet, but it sounds very strategic and engaging. I also know some people who work at different companies that enjoy indoor gaming in the afternoon, much like your exec friends enjoy their evening gatherings. By the way, have you ever tried foraging? Some of my friends who work in different sectors, from travel companies to construction, find it a refreshing morning hobby.\"\n\nTurn #4: William Brown said: \"I suppose early birds like your friends and Rafael have something in common with enjoying their hobbies in the morning, even if the activities are different like foraging and kayaking. And yes, 'Go' is definitely a strategic game that tells a lot about the culture it originates from. Speaking of indoor games and different sectors, I have a friend named Pamela, she's an avid television watcher and works for General Cable. She enjoys spending her afternoons indoors, maybe something your friends would find common ground with. \"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"It's funny how people enjoy their downtime in different ways, isn't it? Your friend Pamela and some of my friends might enjoy a fascinating conversation about their indoor afternoon hobbies. Some of my other friends, particularly one who works for Union Bank, loves motoring, which is quite an thrilling outdoor activity. Do you happen to know anyone who's into motor sports?\"\n\nTurn #6: William Brown said: \"Isn't it? The way we choose to spend our free time really says a lot about us. Motor sports, huh? Now that's adventurous! I don't have any friends who are into motor sports but I know a few who are really into kayaking. Speaking of exciting activities, do you or any of your friends find interest in learning foreign languages? Because my friend Chad, who also works at General Cable, loves it. He usually enjoys this indoor activity in the evenings.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Learning foreign languages does sound interesting! Speaking of indoor evening activities, I know someone named Robin who enjoys gaming during those hours. But hey, dabbling in different hobbies often brings its own kind of joy, right? Like lace-making, something my friend Tina from Groupon enjoys. Say, William, do you by any chance know someone who's into crafts like that?\"\n\nTurn #8: William Brown said: \"Lace-making, that's intriguing! While I do know a friend who works at Groupon, his hobby is the 'Go' game rather than crafts. Let's see who else... Ah, I have a friend named Kristin, who works at H. J. Heinz Company and she's an animal fan, not exactly crafts but it shows similar patience and love for details. What about you Ava, or your friends, any interest in animals or nature?\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"That's a great point, William. Interests in nature and animal surely require patience and attention to the details, much like crafts. One of my friends, Raymond, certainly shares that perspective, as he's always out foraging early in the morning. It's his unique way of connecting with nature. However, I personally spend my free time with creative activities, like drawing and writing poetry. But, speaking of attention to detail, do you know anyone who is into gaming? A friend of mine, Scott from Expedia, appreciates the strategic thinking required in it.\"\n\nTurn #10: William Brown said: \"Ah, gaming. Now that is a hobby that requires strategic thinking. It reminds me of my friends who enjoy the 'Go' game. I've yet to find the right game for myself though. Artistic activities like your drawing and poetry also speak volumes about attention to detail. So, do you have friends who work at specific companies, Ava? Maybe at H.J. Heinz Company or General Cable perhaps?\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"That's interesting, William. I do know a few folks working in various companies. In fact, one of my friends, Rafael, works at General Cable and as you mentioned, he loves his early morning kayaking. By the way, given you're a chef, do you like tasting different cuisines during your travels? I'm curious because one of my friends, James from Urban Outfitters, is a huge fan of vacationing and tasting various local foods.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, tasting different cuisines during travels is exciting, Ava! In fact, it's a passion shared by me and my friend David, who works at H. J. Heinz Company. We usually discuss our discovery of new dishes during the evenings, usually in an outdoor setting. It sounds like your friend James from Urban Outfitters and David could exchange some fantastic travel and food experiences! Is Rafael the only friend you have at General Cable, or do you know anyone else there?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: William Brown and Ava Martinez\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nAva Martinez's background: \nWilliam Brown's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDavid: Hobby: Vacation Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nChristopher: Hobby: Go Company: McKinsey & Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nLee: Hobby: Go Company: Groupon Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPamela: Hobby: Watching television Company: General Cable Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nPhillip: Hobby: Kayaking Company: Sauer-Danfoss Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nKristin: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nRafael: Hobby: Kayaking Company: General Cable Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nChad: Hobby: Foreign language learning Company: General Cable Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPhil: Hobby: Kayaking Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nConnie: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: General Cable Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nTommy: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \n\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: William Brown said: \"Hello Ava, nice to meet you! I'm William, a local chef who loves trying out new recipes. Do you also enjoy exploring local food scenes or do you prefer any particular cuisine?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hi William, nice to meet you. I'm Ava. I do enjoy exploring local cuisines, especially if they reflect the culture and history of their place of origin. As a student, I'm always searching for new experiences. Speaking of new experiences, do you enjoy any outdoor activities in the morning? Some of my friends really appreciate that sort of engagement, like foraging or weightlifting, for instance.\"\n\nTurn #2: William Brown said: \"Outdoor activities in the morning, you say? One of my friends, Rafael, actually enjoys kayaking early in the day. Different timings for different folks, I guess. I'm more of a night person myself. Now, speaking of cultures and history, have you heard of the 'Go' game? Some executives I know from various companies like playing it during evening gatherings. I always thought it reflected a part of Asia's rich history.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Interesting, Rafael must have a really unique experience doing kayaking that early. As for the 'Go' game, I haven't played it yet, but it sounds very strategic and engaging. I also know some people who work at different companies that enjoy indoor gaming in the afternoon, much like your exec friends enjoy their evening gatherings. By the way, have you ever tried foraging? Some of my friends who work in different sectors, from travel companies to construction, find it a refreshing morning hobby.\"\n\nTurn #4: William Brown said: \"I suppose early birds like your friends and Rafael have something in common with enjoying their hobbies in the morning, even if the activities are different like foraging and kayaking. And yes, 'Go' is definitely a strategic game that tells a lot about the culture it originates from. Speaking of indoor games and different sectors, I have a friend named Pamela, she's an avid television watcher and works for General Cable. She enjoys spending her afternoons indoors, maybe something your friends would find common ground with. \"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"It's funny how people enjoy their downtime in different ways, isn't it? Your friend Pamela and some of my friends might enjoy a fascinating conversation about their indoor afternoon hobbies. Some of my other friends, particularly one who works for Union Bank, loves motoring, which is quite an thrilling outdoor activity. Do you happen to know anyone who's into motor sports?\"\n\nTurn #6: William Brown said: \"Isn't it? The way we choose to spend our free time really says a lot about us. Motor sports, huh? Now that's adventurous! I don't have any friends who are into motor sports but I know a few who are really into kayaking. Speaking of exciting activities, do you or any of your friends find interest in learning foreign languages? Because my friend Chad, who also works at General Cable, loves it. He usually enjoys this indoor activity in the evenings.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Learning foreign languages does sound interesting! Speaking of indoor evening activities, I know someone named Robin who enjoys gaming during those hours. But hey, dabbling in different hobbies often brings its own kind of joy, right? Like lace-making, something my friend Tina from Groupon enjoys. Say, William, do you by any chance know someone who's into crafts like that?\"\n\nTurn #8: William Brown said: \"Lace-making, that's intriguing! While I do know a friend who works at Groupon, his hobby is the 'Go' game rather than crafts. Let's see who else... Ah, I have a friend named Kristin, who works at H. J. Heinz Company and she's an animal fan, not exactly crafts but it shows similar patience and love for details. What about you Ava, or your friends, any interest in animals or nature?\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"That's a great point, William. Interests in nature and animal surely require patience and attention to the details, much like crafts. One of my friends, Raymond, certainly shares that perspective, as he's always out foraging early in the morning. It's his unique way of connecting with nature. However, I personally spend my free time with creative activities, like drawing and writing poetry. But, speaking of attention to detail, do you know anyone who is into gaming? A friend of mine, Scott from Expedia, appreciates the strategic thinking required in it.\"\n\nTurn #10: William Brown said: \"Ah, gaming. Now that is a hobby that requires strategic thinking. It reminds me of my friends who enjoy the 'Go' game. I've yet to find the right game for myself though. Artistic activities like your drawing and poetry also speak volumes about attention to detail. So, do you have friends who work at specific companies, Ava? Maybe at H.J. Heinz Company or General Cable perhaps?\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"That's interesting, William. I do know a few folks working in various companies. In fact, one of my friends, Rafael, works at General Cable and as you mentioned, he loves his early morning kayaking. By the way, given you're a chef, do you like tasting different cuisines during your travels? I'm curious because one of my friends, James from Urban Outfitters, is a huge fan of vacationing and tasting various local foods.\"\n\nTurn #12: William Brown said: \"Indeed, tasting different cuisines during travels is exciting, Ava! In fact, it's a passion shared by me and my friend David, who works at H. J. Heinz Company. We usually discuss our discovery of new dishes during the evenings, usually in an outdoor setting. It sounds like your friend James from Urban Outfitters and David could exchange some fantastic travel and food experiences! Is Rafael the only friend you have at General Cable, or do you know anyone else there?\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Martinez said: \"Rafael is indeed the only friend of mine from General Cable. It's incredible how through such diverse hobbies, professionals from varied sectors connect. Speaking of sectors, I know a few people working at Groupon, Union Bank, and a few other places. It's intriguing how we all find certain things in common despite our different lifestyles. Isn't it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely Ava, it's truly fascinating how our paths intersect in such diverse ways. Rafael must be quite an early bird with his kayaking. Speaking of Groupon and Union Bank, I know a Lee who works at Groupon, who's also a fan of the 'Go' game, and enjoys playing in the evening, mainly indoors though. It truly is a small world, wouldn't you agree?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: William Brown and Ava Martinez\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nAva Martinez's background: \nWilliam Brown's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDavid: Hobby: Vacation Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nChristopher: Hobby: Go Company: McKinsey & Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nLee: Hobby: Go Company: Groupon Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPamela: Hobby: Watching television Company: General Cable Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nPhillip: Hobby: Kayaking Company: Sauer-Danfoss Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nKristin: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nRafael: Hobby: Kayaking Company: General Cable Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nChad: Hobby: Foreign language learning Company: General Cable Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPhil: Hobby: Kayaking Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nConnie: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: General Cable Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nTommy: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \n\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: William Brown said: \"Hello Ava, nice to meet you! I'm William, a local chef who loves trying out new recipes. Do you also enjoy exploring local food scenes or do you prefer any particular cuisine?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hi William, nice to meet you. I'm Ava. I do enjoy exploring local cuisines, especially if they reflect the culture and history of their place of origin. As a student, I'm always searching for new experiences. Speaking of new experiences, do you enjoy any outdoor activities in the morning? Some of my friends really appreciate that sort of engagement, like foraging or weightlifting, for instance.\"\n\nTurn #2: William Brown said: \"Outdoor activities in the morning, you say? One of my friends, Rafael, actually enjoys kayaking early in the day. Different timings for different folks, I guess. I'm more of a night person myself. Now, speaking of cultures and history, have you heard of the 'Go' game? Some executives I know from various companies like playing it during evening gatherings. I always thought it reflected a part of Asia's rich history.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Interesting, Rafael must have a really unique experience doing kayaking that early. As for the 'Go' game, I haven't played it yet, but it sounds very strategic and engaging. I also know some people who work at different companies that enjoy indoor gaming in the afternoon, much like your exec friends enjoy their evening gatherings. By the way, have you ever tried foraging? Some of my friends who work in different sectors, from travel companies to construction, find it a refreshing morning hobby.\"\n\nTurn #4: William Brown said: \"I suppose early birds like your friends and Rafael have something in common with enjoying their hobbies in the morning, even if the activities are different like foraging and kayaking. And yes, 'Go' is definitely a strategic game that tells a lot about the culture it originates from. Speaking of indoor games and different sectors, I have a friend named Pamela, she's an avid television watcher and works for General Cable. She enjoys spending her afternoons indoors, maybe something your friends would find common ground with. \"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"It's funny how people enjoy their downtime in different ways, isn't it? Your friend Pamela and some of my friends might enjoy a fascinating conversation about their indoor afternoon hobbies. Some of my other friends, particularly one who works for Union Bank, loves motoring, which is quite an thrilling outdoor activity. Do you happen to know anyone who's into motor sports?\"\n\nTurn #6: William Brown said: \"Isn't it? The way we choose to spend our free time really says a lot about us. Motor sports, huh? Now that's adventurous! I don't have any friends who are into motor sports but I know a few who are really into kayaking. Speaking of exciting activities, do you or any of your friends find interest in learning foreign languages? Because my friend Chad, who also works at General Cable, loves it. He usually enjoys this indoor activity in the evenings.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Learning foreign languages does sound interesting! Speaking of indoor evening activities, I know someone named Robin who enjoys gaming during those hours. But hey, dabbling in different hobbies often brings its own kind of joy, right? Like lace-making, something my friend Tina from Groupon enjoys. Say, William, do you by any chance know someone who's into crafts like that?\"\n\nTurn #8: William Brown said: \"Lace-making, that's intriguing! While I do know a friend who works at Groupon, his hobby is the 'Go' game rather than crafts. Let's see who else... Ah, I have a friend named Kristin, who works at H. J. Heinz Company and she's an animal fan, not exactly crafts but it shows similar patience and love for details. What about you Ava, or your friends, any interest in animals or nature?\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"That's a great point, William. Interests in nature and animal surely require patience and attention to the details, much like crafts. One of my friends, Raymond, certainly shares that perspective, as he's always out foraging early in the morning. It's his unique way of connecting with nature. However, I personally spend my free time with creative activities, like drawing and writing poetry. But, speaking of attention to detail, do you know anyone who is into gaming? A friend of mine, Scott from Expedia, appreciates the strategic thinking required in it.\"\n\nTurn #10: William Brown said: \"Ah, gaming. Now that is a hobby that requires strategic thinking. It reminds me of my friends who enjoy the 'Go' game. I've yet to find the right game for myself though. Artistic activities like your drawing and poetry also speak volumes about attention to detail. So, do you have friends who work at specific companies, Ava? Maybe at H.J. Heinz Company or General Cable perhaps?\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"That's interesting, William. I do know a few folks working in various companies. In fact, one of my friends, Rafael, works at General Cable and as you mentioned, he loves his early morning kayaking. By the way, given you're a chef, do you like tasting different cuisines during your travels? I'm curious because one of my friends, James from Urban Outfitters, is a huge fan of vacationing and tasting various local foods.\"\n\nTurn #12: William Brown said: \"Indeed, tasting different cuisines during travels is exciting, Ava! In fact, it's a passion shared by me and my friend David, who works at H. J. Heinz Company. We usually discuss our discovery of new dishes during the evenings, usually in an outdoor setting. It sounds like your friend James from Urban Outfitters and David could exchange some fantastic travel and food experiences! Is Rafael the only friend you have at General Cable, or do you know anyone else there?\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Martinez said: \"Rafael is indeed the only friend of mine from General Cable. It's incredible how through such diverse hobbies, professionals from varied sectors connect. Speaking of sectors, I know a few people working at Groupon, Union Bank, and a few other places. It's intriguing how we all find certain things in common despite our different lifestyles. Isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #14: William Brown said: \"Absolutely Ava, it's truly fascinating how our paths intersect in such diverse ways. Rafael must be quite an early bird with his kayaking. Speaking of Groupon and Union Bank, I know a Lee who works at Groupon, who's also a fan of the 'Go' game, and enjoys playing in the evening, mainly indoors though. It truly is a small world, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #15: Ava Martinez said: \"You're right, William. It is a small world indeed. Seems like we have quite a few mutual interests and connections. It has been lovely chatting with you. Let's continue to explore more about each other's world as the evening goes on. Meanwhile, do you have any recommendations for a must-try dish from your culinary repertoire?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely Ava, there's so much joy in sharing. I'd recommend my signature dish, a lemon-herb marinated seabass with fresh, seasonal vegetables. We should definitely catch up for more such chats later. It was lovely meeting you, Ava.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: William Brown and Ava Martinez\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nAva Martinez's background: \nWilliam Brown's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDavid: Hobby: Vacation Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nChristopher: Hobby: Go Company: McKinsey & Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nLee: Hobby: Go Company: Groupon Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPamela: Hobby: Watching television Company: General Cable Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nPhillip: Hobby: Kayaking Company: Sauer-Danfoss Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nKristin: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nRafael: Hobby: Kayaking Company: General Cable Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nChad: Hobby: Foreign language learning Company: General Cable Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPhil: Hobby: Kayaking Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nConnie: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: General Cable Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nTommy: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \n\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: William Brown said: \"Hello Ava, nice to meet you! I'm William, a local chef who loves trying out new recipes. Do you also enjoy exploring local food scenes or do you prefer any particular cuisine?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hi William, nice to meet you. I'm Ava. I do enjoy exploring local cuisines, especially if they reflect the culture and history of their place of origin. As a student, I'm always searching for new experiences. Speaking of new experiences, do you enjoy any outdoor activities in the morning? Some of my friends really appreciate that sort of engagement, like foraging or weightlifting, for instance.\"\n\nTurn #2: William Brown said: \"Outdoor activities in the morning, you say? One of my friends, Rafael, actually enjoys kayaking early in the day. Different timings for different folks, I guess. I'm more of a night person myself. Now, speaking of cultures and history, have you heard of the 'Go' game? Some executives I know from various companies like playing it during evening gatherings. I always thought it reflected a part of Asia's rich history.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Interesting, Rafael must have a really unique experience doing kayaking that early. As for the 'Go' game, I haven't played it yet, but it sounds very strategic and engaging. I also know some people who work at different companies that enjoy indoor gaming in the afternoon, much like your exec friends enjoy their evening gatherings. By the way, have you ever tried foraging? Some of my friends who work in different sectors, from travel companies to construction, find it a refreshing morning hobby.\"\n\nTurn #4: William Brown said: \"I suppose early birds like your friends and Rafael have something in common with enjoying their hobbies in the morning, even if the activities are different like foraging and kayaking. And yes, 'Go' is definitely a strategic game that tells a lot about the culture it originates from. Speaking of indoor games and different sectors, I have a friend named Pamela, she's an avid television watcher and works for General Cable. She enjoys spending her afternoons indoors, maybe something your friends would find common ground with. \"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"It's funny how people enjoy their downtime in different ways, isn't it? Your friend Pamela and some of my friends might enjoy a fascinating conversation about their indoor afternoon hobbies. Some of my other friends, particularly one who works for Union Bank, loves motoring, which is quite an thrilling outdoor activity. Do you happen to know anyone who's into motor sports?\"\n\nTurn #6: William Brown said: \"Isn't it? The way we choose to spend our free time really says a lot about us. Motor sports, huh? Now that's adventurous! I don't have any friends who are into motor sports but I know a few who are really into kayaking. Speaking of exciting activities, do you or any of your friends find interest in learning foreign languages? Because my friend Chad, who also works at General Cable, loves it. He usually enjoys this indoor activity in the evenings.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Learning foreign languages does sound interesting! Speaking of indoor evening activities, I know someone named Robin who enjoys gaming during those hours. But hey, dabbling in different hobbies often brings its own kind of joy, right? Like lace-making, something my friend Tina from Groupon enjoys. Say, William, do you by any chance know someone who's into crafts like that?\"\n\nTurn #8: William Brown said: \"Lace-making, that's intriguing! While I do know a friend who works at Groupon, his hobby is the 'Go' game rather than crafts. Let's see who else... Ah, I have a friend named Kristin, who works at H. J. Heinz Company and she's an animal fan, not exactly crafts but it shows similar patience and love for details. What about you Ava, or your friends, any interest in animals or nature?\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"That's a great point, William. Interests in nature and animal surely require patience and attention to the details, much like crafts. One of my friends, Raymond, certainly shares that perspective, as he's always out foraging early in the morning. It's his unique way of connecting with nature. However, I personally spend my free time with creative activities, like drawing and writing poetry. But, speaking of attention to detail, do you know anyone who is into gaming? A friend of mine, Scott from Expedia, appreciates the strategic thinking required in it.\"\n\nTurn #10: William Brown said: \"Ah, gaming. Now that is a hobby that requires strategic thinking. It reminds me of my friends who enjoy the 'Go' game. I've yet to find the right game for myself though. Artistic activities like your drawing and poetry also speak volumes about attention to detail. So, do you have friends who work at specific companies, Ava? Maybe at H.J. Heinz Company or General Cable perhaps?\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"That's interesting, William. I do know a few folks working in various companies. In fact, one of my friends, Rafael, works at General Cable and as you mentioned, he loves his early morning kayaking. By the way, given you're a chef, do you like tasting different cuisines during your travels? I'm curious because one of my friends, James from Urban Outfitters, is a huge fan of vacationing and tasting various local foods.\"\n\nTurn #12: William Brown said: \"Indeed, tasting different cuisines during travels is exciting, Ava! In fact, it's a passion shared by me and my friend David, who works at H. J. Heinz Company. We usually discuss our discovery of new dishes during the evenings, usually in an outdoor setting. It sounds like your friend James from Urban Outfitters and David could exchange some fantastic travel and food experiences! Is Rafael the only friend you have at General Cable, or do you know anyone else there?\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Martinez said: \"Rafael is indeed the only friend of mine from General Cable. It's incredible how through such diverse hobbies, professionals from varied sectors connect. Speaking of sectors, I know a few people working at Groupon, Union Bank, and a few other places. It's intriguing how we all find certain things in common despite our different lifestyles. Isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #14: William Brown said: \"Absolutely Ava, it's truly fascinating how our paths intersect in such diverse ways. Rafael must be quite an early bird with his kayaking. Speaking of Groupon and Union Bank, I know a Lee who works at Groupon, who's also a fan of the 'Go' game, and enjoys playing in the evening, mainly indoors though. It truly is a small world, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #15: Ava Martinez said: \"You're right, William. It is a small world indeed. Seems like we have quite a few mutual interests and connections. It has been lovely chatting with you. Let's continue to explore more about each other's world as the evening goes on. Meanwhile, do you have any recommendations for a must-try dish from your culinary repertoire?\"\n\nTurn #16: William Brown said: \"Absolutely Ava, there's so much joy in sharing. I'd recommend my signature dish, a lemon-herb marinated seabass with fresh, seasonal vegetables. We should definitely catch up for more such chats later. It was lovely meeting you, Ava.\"\n\nTurn #17: Ava Martinez said: \"Oh, the lemon-herb marinated seabass sounds absolutely divine. I'll definitely give it a try, William. It was fantastic meeting you. Let's keep in touch, and perhaps even introduce our mutual friends someday. Enjoy the rest of the evening!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #18. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: William Brown and Ava Martinez\nWilliam Brown's background: \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nTina: Hobby: Lacemaking Company: Groupon Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRafael: Hobby: Kayaking Company: General Cable Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nWanda: Hobby: Weightlifting Company: Sauer-Danfoss Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRaymond: Hobby: Foraging Company: Chicago Bridge & Iron Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRicky: Hobby: Foraging Company: L. W. Seecamp Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRobert: Hobby: Foraging Company: Lennox International Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nFrances: Hobby: Foraging Company: Expedia Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nScott: Hobby: Gaming Company: Expedia Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nHelen: Hobby: Motor sports Company: Union Bank Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRobin: Hobby: Gaming Company: L. W. Seecamp Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nJames: Hobby: Vacation Company: Urban Outfitters Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: William Brown said: \"Hello Ava, nice to meet you! I'm William, a local chef who loves trying out new recipes. Do you also enjoy exploring local food scenes or do you prefer any particular cuisine?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hi William, nice to meet you. I'm Ava. I do enjoy exploring local cuisines, especially if they reflect the culture and history of their place of origin. As a student, I'm always searching for new experiences. Speaking of new experiences, do you enjoy any outdoor activities in the morning? Some of my friends really appreciate that sort of engagement, like foraging or weightlifting, for instance.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: William Brown and Ava Martinez\nWilliam Brown's background: \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nTina: Hobby: Lacemaking Company: Groupon Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRafael: Hobby: Kayaking Company: General Cable Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nWanda: Hobby: Weightlifting Company: Sauer-Danfoss Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRaymond: Hobby: Foraging Company: Chicago Bridge & Iron Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRicky: Hobby: Foraging Company: L. W. Seecamp Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRobert: Hobby: Foraging Company: Lennox International Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nFrances: Hobby: Foraging Company: Expedia Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nScott: Hobby: Gaming Company: Expedia Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nHelen: Hobby: Motor sports Company: Union Bank Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRobin: Hobby: Gaming Company: L. W. Seecamp Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nJames: Hobby: Vacation Company: Urban Outfitters Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: William Brown said: \"Hello Ava, nice to meet you! I'm William, a local chef who loves trying out new recipes. Do you also enjoy exploring local food scenes or do you prefer any particular cuisine?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hi William, nice to meet you. I'm Ava. I do enjoy exploring local cuisines, especially if they reflect the culture and history of their place of origin. As a student, I'm always searching for new experiences. Speaking of new experiences, do you enjoy any outdoor activities in the morning? Some of my friends really appreciate that sort of engagement, like foraging or weightlifting, for instance.\"\n\nTurn #2: William Brown said: \"Outdoor activities in the morning, you say? One of my friends, Rafael, actually enjoys kayaking early in the day. Different timings for different folks, I guess. I'm more of a night person myself. Now, speaking of cultures and history, have you heard of the 'Go' game? Some executives I know from various companies like playing it during evening gatherings. I always thought it reflected a part of Asia's rich history.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Interesting, Rafael must have a really unique experience doing kayaking that early. As for the 'Go' game, I haven't played it yet, but it sounds very strategic and engaging. I also know some people who work at different companies that enjoy indoor gaming in the afternoon, much like your exec friends enjoy their evening gatherings. By the way, have you ever tried foraging? Some of my friends who work in different sectors, from travel companies to construction, find it a refreshing morning hobby.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: William Brown and Ava Martinez\nWilliam Brown's background: \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nTina: Hobby: Lacemaking Company: Groupon Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRafael: Hobby: Kayaking Company: General Cable Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nWanda: Hobby: Weightlifting Company: Sauer-Danfoss Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRaymond: Hobby: Foraging Company: Chicago Bridge & Iron Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRicky: Hobby: Foraging Company: L. W. Seecamp Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRobert: Hobby: Foraging Company: Lennox International Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nFrances: Hobby: Foraging Company: Expedia Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nScott: Hobby: Gaming Company: Expedia Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nHelen: Hobby: Motor sports Company: Union Bank Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRobin: Hobby: Gaming Company: L. W. Seecamp Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nJames: Hobby: Vacation Company: Urban Outfitters Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: William Brown said: \"Hello Ava, nice to meet you! I'm William, a local chef who loves trying out new recipes. Do you also enjoy exploring local food scenes or do you prefer any particular cuisine?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hi William, nice to meet you. I'm Ava. I do enjoy exploring local cuisines, especially if they reflect the culture and history of their place of origin. As a student, I'm always searching for new experiences. Speaking of new experiences, do you enjoy any outdoor activities in the morning? Some of my friends really appreciate that sort of engagement, like foraging or weightlifting, for instance.\"\n\nTurn #2: William Brown said: \"Outdoor activities in the morning, you say? One of my friends, Rafael, actually enjoys kayaking early in the day. Different timings for different folks, I guess. I'm more of a night person myself. Now, speaking of cultures and history, have you heard of the 'Go' game? Some executives I know from various companies like playing it during evening gatherings. I always thought it reflected a part of Asia's rich history.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Interesting, Rafael must have a really unique experience doing kayaking that early. As for the 'Go' game, I haven't played it yet, but it sounds very strategic and engaging. I also know some people who work at different companies that enjoy indoor gaming in the afternoon, much like your exec friends enjoy their evening gatherings. By the way, have you ever tried foraging? Some of my friends who work in different sectors, from travel companies to construction, find it a refreshing morning hobby.\"\n\nTurn #4: William Brown said: \"I suppose early birds like your friends and Rafael have something in common with enjoying their hobbies in the morning, even if the activities are different like foraging and kayaking. And yes, 'Go' is definitely a strategic game that tells a lot about the culture it originates from. Speaking of indoor games and different sectors, I have a friend named Pamela, she's an avid television watcher and works for General Cable. She enjoys spending her afternoons indoors, maybe something your friends would find common ground with. \"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"It's funny how people enjoy their downtime in different ways, isn't it? Your friend Pamela and some of my friends might enjoy a fascinating conversation about their indoor afternoon hobbies. Some of my other friends, particularly one who works for Union Bank, loves motoring, which is quite an thrilling outdoor activity. Do you happen to know anyone who's into motor sports?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: William Brown and Ava Martinez\nWilliam Brown's background: \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nTina: Hobby: Lacemaking Company: Groupon Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRafael: Hobby: Kayaking Company: General Cable Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nWanda: Hobby: Weightlifting Company: Sauer-Danfoss Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRaymond: Hobby: Foraging Company: Chicago Bridge & Iron Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRicky: Hobby: Foraging Company: L. W. Seecamp Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRobert: Hobby: Foraging Company: Lennox International Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nFrances: Hobby: Foraging Company: Expedia Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nScott: Hobby: Gaming Company: Expedia Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nHelen: Hobby: Motor sports Company: Union Bank Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRobin: Hobby: Gaming Company: L. W. Seecamp Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nJames: Hobby: Vacation Company: Urban Outfitters Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: William Brown said: \"Hello Ava, nice to meet you! I'm William, a local chef who loves trying out new recipes. Do you also enjoy exploring local food scenes or do you prefer any particular cuisine?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hi William, nice to meet you. I'm Ava. I do enjoy exploring local cuisines, especially if they reflect the culture and history of their place of origin. As a student, I'm always searching for new experiences. Speaking of new experiences, do you enjoy any outdoor activities in the morning? Some of my friends really appreciate that sort of engagement, like foraging or weightlifting, for instance.\"\n\nTurn #2: William Brown said: \"Outdoor activities in the morning, you say? One of my friends, Rafael, actually enjoys kayaking early in the day. Different timings for different folks, I guess. I'm more of a night person myself. Now, speaking of cultures and history, have you heard of the 'Go' game? Some executives I know from various companies like playing it during evening gatherings. I always thought it reflected a part of Asia's rich history.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Interesting, Rafael must have a really unique experience doing kayaking that early. As for the 'Go' game, I haven't played it yet, but it sounds very strategic and engaging. I also know some people who work at different companies that enjoy indoor gaming in the afternoon, much like your exec friends enjoy their evening gatherings. By the way, have you ever tried foraging? Some of my friends who work in different sectors, from travel companies to construction, find it a refreshing morning hobby.\"\n\nTurn #4: William Brown said: \"I suppose early birds like your friends and Rafael have something in common with enjoying their hobbies in the morning, even if the activities are different like foraging and kayaking. And yes, 'Go' is definitely a strategic game that tells a lot about the culture it originates from. Speaking of indoor games and different sectors, I have a friend named Pamela, she's an avid television watcher and works for General Cable. She enjoys spending her afternoons indoors, maybe something your friends would find common ground with. \"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"It's funny how people enjoy their downtime in different ways, isn't it? Your friend Pamela and some of my friends might enjoy a fascinating conversation about their indoor afternoon hobbies. Some of my other friends, particularly one who works for Union Bank, loves motoring, which is quite an thrilling outdoor activity. Do you happen to know anyone who's into motor sports?\"\n\nTurn #6: William Brown said: \"Isn't it? The way we choose to spend our free time really says a lot about us. Motor sports, huh? Now that's adventurous! I don't have any friends who are into motor sports but I know a few who are really into kayaking. Speaking of exciting activities, do you or any of your friends find interest in learning foreign languages? Because my friend Chad, who also works at General Cable, loves it. He usually enjoys this indoor activity in the evenings.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Learning foreign languages does sound interesting! Speaking of indoor evening activities, I know someone named Robin who enjoys gaming during those hours. But hey, dabbling in different hobbies often brings its own kind of joy, right? Like lace-making, something my friend Tina from Groupon enjoys. Say, William, do you by any chance know someone who's into crafts like that?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: William Brown and Ava Martinez\nWilliam Brown's background: \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nTina: Hobby: Lacemaking Company: Groupon Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRafael: Hobby: Kayaking Company: General Cable Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nWanda: Hobby: Weightlifting Company: Sauer-Danfoss Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRaymond: Hobby: Foraging Company: Chicago Bridge & Iron Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRicky: Hobby: Foraging Company: L. W. Seecamp Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRobert: Hobby: Foraging Company: Lennox International Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nFrances: Hobby: Foraging Company: Expedia Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nScott: Hobby: Gaming Company: Expedia Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nHelen: Hobby: Motor sports Company: Union Bank Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRobin: Hobby: Gaming Company: L. W. Seecamp Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nJames: Hobby: Vacation Company: Urban Outfitters Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: William Brown said: \"Hello Ava, nice to meet you! I'm William, a local chef who loves trying out new recipes. Do you also enjoy exploring local food scenes or do you prefer any particular cuisine?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hi William, nice to meet you. I'm Ava. I do enjoy exploring local cuisines, especially if they reflect the culture and history of their place of origin. As a student, I'm always searching for new experiences. Speaking of new experiences, do you enjoy any outdoor activities in the morning? Some of my friends really appreciate that sort of engagement, like foraging or weightlifting, for instance.\"\n\nTurn #2: William Brown said: \"Outdoor activities in the morning, you say? One of my friends, Rafael, actually enjoys kayaking early in the day. Different timings for different folks, I guess. I'm more of a night person myself. Now, speaking of cultures and history, have you heard of the 'Go' game? Some executives I know from various companies like playing it during evening gatherings. I always thought it reflected a part of Asia's rich history.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Interesting, Rafael must have a really unique experience doing kayaking that early. As for the 'Go' game, I haven't played it yet, but it sounds very strategic and engaging. I also know some people who work at different companies that enjoy indoor gaming in the afternoon, much like your exec friends enjoy their evening gatherings. By the way, have you ever tried foraging? Some of my friends who work in different sectors, from travel companies to construction, find it a refreshing morning hobby.\"\n\nTurn #4: William Brown said: \"I suppose early birds like your friends and Rafael have something in common with enjoying their hobbies in the morning, even if the activities are different like foraging and kayaking. And yes, 'Go' is definitely a strategic game that tells a lot about the culture it originates from. Speaking of indoor games and different sectors, I have a friend named Pamela, she's an avid television watcher and works for General Cable. She enjoys spending her afternoons indoors, maybe something your friends would find common ground with. \"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"It's funny how people enjoy their downtime in different ways, isn't it? Your friend Pamela and some of my friends might enjoy a fascinating conversation about their indoor afternoon hobbies. Some of my other friends, particularly one who works for Union Bank, loves motoring, which is quite an thrilling outdoor activity. Do you happen to know anyone who's into motor sports?\"\n\nTurn #6: William Brown said: \"Isn't it? The way we choose to spend our free time really says a lot about us. Motor sports, huh? Now that's adventurous! I don't have any friends who are into motor sports but I know a few who are really into kayaking. Speaking of exciting activities, do you or any of your friends find interest in learning foreign languages? Because my friend Chad, who also works at General Cable, loves it. He usually enjoys this indoor activity in the evenings.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Learning foreign languages does sound interesting! Speaking of indoor evening activities, I know someone named Robin who enjoys gaming during those hours. But hey, dabbling in different hobbies often brings its own kind of joy, right? Like lace-making, something my friend Tina from Groupon enjoys. Say, William, do you by any chance know someone who's into crafts like that?\"\n\nTurn #8: William Brown said: \"Lace-making, that's intriguing! While I do know a friend who works at Groupon, his hobby is the 'Go' game rather than crafts. Let's see who else... Ah, I have a friend named Kristin, who works at H. J. Heinz Company and she's an animal fan, not exactly crafts but it shows similar patience and love for details. What about you Ava, or your friends, any interest in animals or nature?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's a great point, William. Interests in nature and animal surely require patience and attention to the details, much like crafts. One of my friends, Raymond, certainly shares that perspective, as he's always out foraging early in the morning. It's his unique way of connecting with nature. However, I personally spend my free time with creative activities, like drawing and writing poetry. But, speaking of attention to detail, do you know anyone who is into gaming? A friend of mine, Scott from Expedia, appreciates the strategic thinking required in it.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: William Brown and Ava Martinez\nWilliam Brown's background: \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nTina: Hobby: Lacemaking Company: Groupon Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRafael: Hobby: Kayaking Company: General Cable Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nWanda: Hobby: Weightlifting Company: Sauer-Danfoss Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRaymond: Hobby: Foraging Company: Chicago Bridge & Iron Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRicky: Hobby: Foraging Company: L. W. Seecamp Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRobert: Hobby: Foraging Company: Lennox International Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nFrances: Hobby: Foraging Company: Expedia Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nScott: Hobby: Gaming Company: Expedia Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nHelen: Hobby: Motor sports Company: Union Bank Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRobin: Hobby: Gaming Company: L. W. Seecamp Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nJames: Hobby: Vacation Company: Urban Outfitters Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: William Brown said: \"Hello Ava, nice to meet you! I'm William, a local chef who loves trying out new recipes. Do you also enjoy exploring local food scenes or do you prefer any particular cuisine?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hi William, nice to meet you. I'm Ava. I do enjoy exploring local cuisines, especially if they reflect the culture and history of their place of origin. As a student, I'm always searching for new experiences. Speaking of new experiences, do you enjoy any outdoor activities in the morning? Some of my friends really appreciate that sort of engagement, like foraging or weightlifting, for instance.\"\n\nTurn #2: William Brown said: \"Outdoor activities in the morning, you say? One of my friends, Rafael, actually enjoys kayaking early in the day. Different timings for different folks, I guess. I'm more of a night person myself. Now, speaking of cultures and history, have you heard of the 'Go' game? Some executives I know from various companies like playing it during evening gatherings. I always thought it reflected a part of Asia's rich history.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Interesting, Rafael must have a really unique experience doing kayaking that early. As for the 'Go' game, I haven't played it yet, but it sounds very strategic and engaging. I also know some people who work at different companies that enjoy indoor gaming in the afternoon, much like your exec friends enjoy their evening gatherings. By the way, have you ever tried foraging? Some of my friends who work in different sectors, from travel companies to construction, find it a refreshing morning hobby.\"\n\nTurn #4: William Brown said: \"I suppose early birds like your friends and Rafael have something in common with enjoying their hobbies in the morning, even if the activities are different like foraging and kayaking. And yes, 'Go' is definitely a strategic game that tells a lot about the culture it originates from. Speaking of indoor games and different sectors, I have a friend named Pamela, she's an avid television watcher and works for General Cable. She enjoys spending her afternoons indoors, maybe something your friends would find common ground with. \"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"It's funny how people enjoy their downtime in different ways, isn't it? Your friend Pamela and some of my friends might enjoy a fascinating conversation about their indoor afternoon hobbies. Some of my other friends, particularly one who works for Union Bank, loves motoring, which is quite an thrilling outdoor activity. Do you happen to know anyone who's into motor sports?\"\n\nTurn #6: William Brown said: \"Isn't it? The way we choose to spend our free time really says a lot about us. Motor sports, huh? Now that's adventurous! I don't have any friends who are into motor sports but I know a few who are really into kayaking. Speaking of exciting activities, do you or any of your friends find interest in learning foreign languages? Because my friend Chad, who also works at General Cable, loves it. He usually enjoys this indoor activity in the evenings.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Learning foreign languages does sound interesting! Speaking of indoor evening activities, I know someone named Robin who enjoys gaming during those hours. But hey, dabbling in different hobbies often brings its own kind of joy, right? Like lace-making, something my friend Tina from Groupon enjoys. Say, William, do you by any chance know someone who's into crafts like that?\"\n\nTurn #8: William Brown said: \"Lace-making, that's intriguing! While I do know a friend who works at Groupon, his hobby is the 'Go' game rather than crafts. Let's see who else... Ah, I have a friend named Kristin, who works at H. J. Heinz Company and she's an animal fan, not exactly crafts but it shows similar patience and love for details. What about you Ava, or your friends, any interest in animals or nature?\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"That's a great point, William. Interests in nature and animal surely require patience and attention to the details, much like crafts. One of my friends, Raymond, certainly shares that perspective, as he's always out foraging early in the morning. It's his unique way of connecting with nature. However, I personally spend my free time with creative activities, like drawing and writing poetry. But, speaking of attention to detail, do you know anyone who is into gaming? A friend of mine, Scott from Expedia, appreciates the strategic thinking required in it.\"\n\nTurn #10: William Brown said: \"Ah, gaming. Now that is a hobby that requires strategic thinking. It reminds me of my friends who enjoy the 'Go' game. I've yet to find the right game for myself though. Artistic activities like your drawing and poetry also speak volumes about attention to detail. So, do you have friends who work at specific companies, Ava? Maybe at H.J. Heinz Company or General Cable perhaps?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's interesting, William. I do know a few folks working in various companies. In fact, one of my friends, Rafael, works at General Cable and as you mentioned, he loves his early morning kayaking. By the way, given you're a chef, do you like tasting different cuisines during your travels? I'm curious because one of my friends, James from Urban Outfitters, is a huge fan of vacationing and tasting various local foods.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: William Brown and Ava Martinez\nWilliam Brown's background: \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nTina: Hobby: Lacemaking Company: Groupon Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRafael: Hobby: Kayaking Company: General Cable Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nWanda: Hobby: Weightlifting Company: Sauer-Danfoss Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRaymond: Hobby: Foraging Company: Chicago Bridge & Iron Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRicky: Hobby: Foraging Company: L. W. Seecamp Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRobert: Hobby: Foraging Company: Lennox International Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nFrances: Hobby: Foraging Company: Expedia Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nScott: Hobby: Gaming Company: Expedia Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nHelen: Hobby: Motor sports Company: Union Bank Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRobin: Hobby: Gaming Company: L. W. Seecamp Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nJames: Hobby: Vacation Company: Urban Outfitters Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: William Brown said: \"Hello Ava, nice to meet you! I'm William, a local chef who loves trying out new recipes. Do you also enjoy exploring local food scenes or do you prefer any particular cuisine?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hi William, nice to meet you. I'm Ava. I do enjoy exploring local cuisines, especially if they reflect the culture and history of their place of origin. As a student, I'm always searching for new experiences. Speaking of new experiences, do you enjoy any outdoor activities in the morning? Some of my friends really appreciate that sort of engagement, like foraging or weightlifting, for instance.\"\n\nTurn #2: William Brown said: \"Outdoor activities in the morning, you say? One of my friends, Rafael, actually enjoys kayaking early in the day. Different timings for different folks, I guess. I'm more of a night person myself. Now, speaking of cultures and history, have you heard of the 'Go' game? Some executives I know from various companies like playing it during evening gatherings. I always thought it reflected a part of Asia's rich history.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Interesting, Rafael must have a really unique experience doing kayaking that early. As for the 'Go' game, I haven't played it yet, but it sounds very strategic and engaging. I also know some people who work at different companies that enjoy indoor gaming in the afternoon, much like your exec friends enjoy their evening gatherings. By the way, have you ever tried foraging? Some of my friends who work in different sectors, from travel companies to construction, find it a refreshing morning hobby.\"\n\nTurn #4: William Brown said: \"I suppose early birds like your friends and Rafael have something in common with enjoying their hobbies in the morning, even if the activities are different like foraging and kayaking. And yes, 'Go' is definitely a strategic game that tells a lot about the culture it originates from. Speaking of indoor games and different sectors, I have a friend named Pamela, she's an avid television watcher and works for General Cable. She enjoys spending her afternoons indoors, maybe something your friends would find common ground with. \"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"It's funny how people enjoy their downtime in different ways, isn't it? Your friend Pamela and some of my friends might enjoy a fascinating conversation about their indoor afternoon hobbies. Some of my other friends, particularly one who works for Union Bank, loves motoring, which is quite an thrilling outdoor activity. Do you happen to know anyone who's into motor sports?\"\n\nTurn #6: William Brown said: \"Isn't it? The way we choose to spend our free time really says a lot about us. Motor sports, huh? Now that's adventurous! I don't have any friends who are into motor sports but I know a few who are really into kayaking. Speaking of exciting activities, do you or any of your friends find interest in learning foreign languages? Because my friend Chad, who also works at General Cable, loves it. He usually enjoys this indoor activity in the evenings.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Learning foreign languages does sound interesting! Speaking of indoor evening activities, I know someone named Robin who enjoys gaming during those hours. But hey, dabbling in different hobbies often brings its own kind of joy, right? Like lace-making, something my friend Tina from Groupon enjoys. Say, William, do you by any chance know someone who's into crafts like that?\"\n\nTurn #8: William Brown said: \"Lace-making, that's intriguing! While I do know a friend who works at Groupon, his hobby is the 'Go' game rather than crafts. Let's see who else... Ah, I have a friend named Kristin, who works at H. J. Heinz Company and she's an animal fan, not exactly crafts but it shows similar patience and love for details. What about you Ava, or your friends, any interest in animals or nature?\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"That's a great point, William. Interests in nature and animal surely require patience and attention to the details, much like crafts. One of my friends, Raymond, certainly shares that perspective, as he's always out foraging early in the morning. It's his unique way of connecting with nature. However, I personally spend my free time with creative activities, like drawing and writing poetry. But, speaking of attention to detail, do you know anyone who is into gaming? A friend of mine, Scott from Expedia, appreciates the strategic thinking required in it.\"\n\nTurn #10: William Brown said: \"Ah, gaming. Now that is a hobby that requires strategic thinking. It reminds me of my friends who enjoy the 'Go' game. I've yet to find the right game for myself though. Artistic activities like your drawing and poetry also speak volumes about attention to detail. So, do you have friends who work at specific companies, Ava? Maybe at H.J. Heinz Company or General Cable perhaps?\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"That's interesting, William. I do know a few folks working in various companies. In fact, one of my friends, Rafael, works at General Cable and as you mentioned, he loves his early morning kayaking. By the way, given you're a chef, do you like tasting different cuisines during your travels? I'm curious because one of my friends, James from Urban Outfitters, is a huge fan of vacationing and tasting various local foods.\"\n\nTurn #12: William Brown said: \"Indeed, tasting different cuisines during travels is exciting, Ava! In fact, it's a passion shared by me and my friend David, who works at H. J. Heinz Company. We usually discuss our discovery of new dishes during the evenings, usually in an outdoor setting. It sounds like your friend James from Urban Outfitters and David could exchange some fantastic travel and food experiences! Is Rafael the only friend you have at General Cable, or do you know anyone else there?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Rafael is indeed the only friend of mine from General Cable. It's incredible how through such diverse hobbies, professionals from varied sectors connect. Speaking of sectors, I know a few people working at Groupon, Union Bank, and a few other places. It's intriguing how we all find certain things in common despite our different lifestyles. Isn't it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: William Brown and Ava Martinez\nWilliam Brown's background: \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nTina: Hobby: Lacemaking Company: Groupon Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRafael: Hobby: Kayaking Company: General Cable Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nWanda: Hobby: Weightlifting Company: Sauer-Danfoss Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRaymond: Hobby: Foraging Company: Chicago Bridge & Iron Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRicky: Hobby: Foraging Company: L. W. Seecamp Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRobert: Hobby: Foraging Company: Lennox International Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nFrances: Hobby: Foraging Company: Expedia Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nScott: Hobby: Gaming Company: Expedia Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nHelen: Hobby: Motor sports Company: Union Bank Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRobin: Hobby: Gaming Company: L. W. Seecamp Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nJames: Hobby: Vacation Company: Urban Outfitters Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: William Brown said: \"Hello Ava, nice to meet you! I'm William, a local chef who loves trying out new recipes. Do you also enjoy exploring local food scenes or do you prefer any particular cuisine?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hi William, nice to meet you. I'm Ava. I do enjoy exploring local cuisines, especially if they reflect the culture and history of their place of origin. As a student, I'm always searching for new experiences. Speaking of new experiences, do you enjoy any outdoor activities in the morning? Some of my friends really appreciate that sort of engagement, like foraging or weightlifting, for instance.\"\n\nTurn #2: William Brown said: \"Outdoor activities in the morning, you say? One of my friends, Rafael, actually enjoys kayaking early in the day. Different timings for different folks, I guess. I'm more of a night person myself. Now, speaking of cultures and history, have you heard of the 'Go' game? Some executives I know from various companies like playing it during evening gatherings. I always thought it reflected a part of Asia's rich history.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Interesting, Rafael must have a really unique experience doing kayaking that early. As for the 'Go' game, I haven't played it yet, but it sounds very strategic and engaging. I also know some people who work at different companies that enjoy indoor gaming in the afternoon, much like your exec friends enjoy their evening gatherings. By the way, have you ever tried foraging? Some of my friends who work in different sectors, from travel companies to construction, find it a refreshing morning hobby.\"\n\nTurn #4: William Brown said: \"I suppose early birds like your friends and Rafael have something in common with enjoying their hobbies in the morning, even if the activities are different like foraging and kayaking. And yes, 'Go' is definitely a strategic game that tells a lot about the culture it originates from. Speaking of indoor games and different sectors, I have a friend named Pamela, she's an avid television watcher and works for General Cable. She enjoys spending her afternoons indoors, maybe something your friends would find common ground with. \"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"It's funny how people enjoy their downtime in different ways, isn't it? Your friend Pamela and some of my friends might enjoy a fascinating conversation about their indoor afternoon hobbies. Some of my other friends, particularly one who works for Union Bank, loves motoring, which is quite an thrilling outdoor activity. Do you happen to know anyone who's into motor sports?\"\n\nTurn #6: William Brown said: \"Isn't it? The way we choose to spend our free time really says a lot about us. Motor sports, huh? Now that's adventurous! I don't have any friends who are into motor sports but I know a few who are really into kayaking. Speaking of exciting activities, do you or any of your friends find interest in learning foreign languages? Because my friend Chad, who also works at General Cable, loves it. He usually enjoys this indoor activity in the evenings.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Learning foreign languages does sound interesting! Speaking of indoor evening activities, I know someone named Robin who enjoys gaming during those hours. But hey, dabbling in different hobbies often brings its own kind of joy, right? Like lace-making, something my friend Tina from Groupon enjoys. Say, William, do you by any chance know someone who's into crafts like that?\"\n\nTurn #8: William Brown said: \"Lace-making, that's intriguing! While I do know a friend who works at Groupon, his hobby is the 'Go' game rather than crafts. Let's see who else... Ah, I have a friend named Kristin, who works at H. J. Heinz Company and she's an animal fan, not exactly crafts but it shows similar patience and love for details. What about you Ava, or your friends, any interest in animals or nature?\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"That's a great point, William. Interests in nature and animal surely require patience and attention to the details, much like crafts. One of my friends, Raymond, certainly shares that perspective, as he's always out foraging early in the morning. It's his unique way of connecting with nature. However, I personally spend my free time with creative activities, like drawing and writing poetry. But, speaking of attention to detail, do you know anyone who is into gaming? A friend of mine, Scott from Expedia, appreciates the strategic thinking required in it.\"\n\nTurn #10: William Brown said: \"Ah, gaming. Now that is a hobby that requires strategic thinking. It reminds me of my friends who enjoy the 'Go' game. I've yet to find the right game for myself though. Artistic activities like your drawing and poetry also speak volumes about attention to detail. So, do you have friends who work at specific companies, Ava? Maybe at H.J. Heinz Company or General Cable perhaps?\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"That's interesting, William. I do know a few folks working in various companies. In fact, one of my friends, Rafael, works at General Cable and as you mentioned, he loves his early morning kayaking. By the way, given you're a chef, do you like tasting different cuisines during your travels? I'm curious because one of my friends, James from Urban Outfitters, is a huge fan of vacationing and tasting various local foods.\"\n\nTurn #12: William Brown said: \"Indeed, tasting different cuisines during travels is exciting, Ava! In fact, it's a passion shared by me and my friend David, who works at H. J. Heinz Company. We usually discuss our discovery of new dishes during the evenings, usually in an outdoor setting. It sounds like your friend James from Urban Outfitters and David could exchange some fantastic travel and food experiences! Is Rafael the only friend you have at General Cable, or do you know anyone else there?\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Martinez said: \"Rafael is indeed the only friend of mine from General Cable. It's incredible how through such diverse hobbies, professionals from varied sectors connect. Speaking of sectors, I know a few people working at Groupon, Union Bank, and a few other places. It's intriguing how we all find certain things in common despite our different lifestyles. Isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #14: William Brown said: \"Absolutely Ava, it's truly fascinating how our paths intersect in such diverse ways. Rafael must be quite an early bird with his kayaking. Speaking of Groupon and Union Bank, I know a Lee who works at Groupon, who's also a fan of the 'Go' game, and enjoys playing in the evening, mainly indoors though. It truly is a small world, wouldn't you agree?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're right, William. It is a small world indeed. Seems like we have quite a few mutual interests and connections. It has been lovely chatting with you. Let's continue to explore more about each other's world as the evening goes on. Meanwhile, do you have any recommendations for a must-try dish from your culinary repertoire?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: William Brown and Ava Martinez\nWilliam Brown's background: \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nTina: Hobby: Lacemaking Company: Groupon Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRafael: Hobby: Kayaking Company: General Cable Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nWanda: Hobby: Weightlifting Company: Sauer-Danfoss Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRaymond: Hobby: Foraging Company: Chicago Bridge & Iron Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRicky: Hobby: Foraging Company: L. W. Seecamp Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRobert: Hobby: Foraging Company: Lennox International Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nFrances: Hobby: Foraging Company: Expedia Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nScott: Hobby: Gaming Company: Expedia Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nHelen: Hobby: Motor sports Company: Union Bank Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRobin: Hobby: Gaming Company: L. W. Seecamp Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nJames: Hobby: Vacation Company: Urban Outfitters Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: William Brown said: \"Hello Ava, nice to meet you! I'm William, a local chef who loves trying out new recipes. Do you also enjoy exploring local food scenes or do you prefer any particular cuisine?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hi William, nice to meet you. I'm Ava. I do enjoy exploring local cuisines, especially if they reflect the culture and history of their place of origin. As a student, I'm always searching for new experiences. Speaking of new experiences, do you enjoy any outdoor activities in the morning? Some of my friends really appreciate that sort of engagement, like foraging or weightlifting, for instance.\"\n\nTurn #2: William Brown said: \"Outdoor activities in the morning, you say? One of my friends, Rafael, actually enjoys kayaking early in the day. Different timings for different folks, I guess. I'm more of a night person myself. Now, speaking of cultures and history, have you heard of the 'Go' game? Some executives I know from various companies like playing it during evening gatherings. I always thought it reflected a part of Asia's rich history.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Interesting, Rafael must have a really unique experience doing kayaking that early. As for the 'Go' game, I haven't played it yet, but it sounds very strategic and engaging. I also know some people who work at different companies that enjoy indoor gaming in the afternoon, much like your exec friends enjoy their evening gatherings. By the way, have you ever tried foraging? Some of my friends who work in different sectors, from travel companies to construction, find it a refreshing morning hobby.\"\n\nTurn #4: William Brown said: \"I suppose early birds like your friends and Rafael have something in common with enjoying their hobbies in the morning, even if the activities are different like foraging and kayaking. And yes, 'Go' is definitely a strategic game that tells a lot about the culture it originates from. Speaking of indoor games and different sectors, I have a friend named Pamela, she's an avid television watcher and works for General Cable. She enjoys spending her afternoons indoors, maybe something your friends would find common ground with. \"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"It's funny how people enjoy their downtime in different ways, isn't it? Your friend Pamela and some of my friends might enjoy a fascinating conversation about their indoor afternoon hobbies. Some of my other friends, particularly one who works for Union Bank, loves motoring, which is quite an thrilling outdoor activity. Do you happen to know anyone who's into motor sports?\"\n\nTurn #6: William Brown said: \"Isn't it? The way we choose to spend our free time really says a lot about us. Motor sports, huh? Now that's adventurous! I don't have any friends who are into motor sports but I know a few who are really into kayaking. Speaking of exciting activities, do you or any of your friends find interest in learning foreign languages? Because my friend Chad, who also works at General Cable, loves it. He usually enjoys this indoor activity in the evenings.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Learning foreign languages does sound interesting! Speaking of indoor evening activities, I know someone named Robin who enjoys gaming during those hours. But hey, dabbling in different hobbies often brings its own kind of joy, right? Like lace-making, something my friend Tina from Groupon enjoys. Say, William, do you by any chance know someone who's into crafts like that?\"\n\nTurn #8: William Brown said: \"Lace-making, that's intriguing! While I do know a friend who works at Groupon, his hobby is the 'Go' game rather than crafts. Let's see who else... Ah, I have a friend named Kristin, who works at H. J. Heinz Company and she's an animal fan, not exactly crafts but it shows similar patience and love for details. What about you Ava, or your friends, any interest in animals or nature?\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"That's a great point, William. Interests in nature and animal surely require patience and attention to the details, much like crafts. One of my friends, Raymond, certainly shares that perspective, as he's always out foraging early in the morning. It's his unique way of connecting with nature. However, I personally spend my free time with creative activities, like drawing and writing poetry. But, speaking of attention to detail, do you know anyone who is into gaming? A friend of mine, Scott from Expedia, appreciates the strategic thinking required in it.\"\n\nTurn #10: William Brown said: \"Ah, gaming. Now that is a hobby that requires strategic thinking. It reminds me of my friends who enjoy the 'Go' game. I've yet to find the right game for myself though. Artistic activities like your drawing and poetry also speak volumes about attention to detail. So, do you have friends who work at specific companies, Ava? Maybe at H.J. Heinz Company or General Cable perhaps?\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"That's interesting, William. I do know a few folks working in various companies. In fact, one of my friends, Rafael, works at General Cable and as you mentioned, he loves his early morning kayaking. By the way, given you're a chef, do you like tasting different cuisines during your travels? I'm curious because one of my friends, James from Urban Outfitters, is a huge fan of vacationing and tasting various local foods.\"\n\nTurn #12: William Brown said: \"Indeed, tasting different cuisines during travels is exciting, Ava! In fact, it's a passion shared by me and my friend David, who works at H. J. Heinz Company. We usually discuss our discovery of new dishes during the evenings, usually in an outdoor setting. It sounds like your friend James from Urban Outfitters and David could exchange some fantastic travel and food experiences! Is Rafael the only friend you have at General Cable, or do you know anyone else there?\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Martinez said: \"Rafael is indeed the only friend of mine from General Cable. It's incredible how through such diverse hobbies, professionals from varied sectors connect. Speaking of sectors, I know a few people working at Groupon, Union Bank, and a few other places. It's intriguing how we all find certain things in common despite our different lifestyles. Isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #14: William Brown said: \"Absolutely Ava, it's truly fascinating how our paths intersect in such diverse ways. Rafael must be quite an early bird with his kayaking. Speaking of Groupon and Union Bank, I know a Lee who works at Groupon, who's also a fan of the 'Go' game, and enjoys playing in the evening, mainly indoors though. It truly is a small world, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #15: Ava Martinez said: \"You're right, William. It is a small world indeed. Seems like we have quite a few mutual interests and connections. It has been lovely chatting with you. Let's continue to explore more about each other's world as the evening goes on. Meanwhile, do you have any recommendations for a must-try dish from your culinary repertoire?\"\n\nTurn #16: William Brown said: \"Absolutely Ava, there's so much joy in sharing. I'd recommend my signature dish, a lemon-herb marinated seabass with fresh, seasonal vegetables. We should definitely catch up for more such chats later. It was lovely meeting you, Ava.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oh, the lemon-herb marinated seabass sounds absolutely divine. I'll definitely give it a try, William. It was fantastic meeting you. Let's keep in touch, and perhaps even introduce our mutual friends someday. Enjoy the rest of the evening!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: William Brown and Ava Martinez\nWilliam Brown's background: \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nTina: Hobby: Lacemaking Company: Groupon Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRafael: Hobby: Kayaking Company: General Cable Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nWanda: Hobby: Weightlifting Company: Sauer-Danfoss Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRaymond: Hobby: Foraging Company: Chicago Bridge & Iron Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRicky: Hobby: Foraging Company: L. W. Seecamp Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRobert: Hobby: Foraging Company: Lennox International Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nFrances: Hobby: Foraging Company: Expedia Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nScott: Hobby: Gaming Company: Expedia Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nHelen: Hobby: Motor sports Company: Union Bank Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRobin: Hobby: Gaming Company: L. W. Seecamp Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nJames: Hobby: Vacation Company: Urban Outfitters Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: William Brown said: \"Hello Ava, nice to meet you! I'm William, a local chef who loves trying out new recipes. Do you also enjoy exploring local food scenes or do you prefer any particular cuisine?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hi William, nice to meet you. I'm Ava. I do enjoy exploring local cuisines, especially if they reflect the culture and history of their place of origin. As a student, I'm always searching for new experiences. Speaking of new experiences, do you enjoy any outdoor activities in the morning? Some of my friends really appreciate that sort of engagement, like foraging or weightlifting, for instance.\"\n\nTurn #2: William Brown said: \"Outdoor activities in the morning, you say? One of my friends, Rafael, actually enjoys kayaking early in the day. Different timings for different folks, I guess. I'm more of a night person myself. Now, speaking of cultures and history, have you heard of the 'Go' game? Some executives I know from various companies like playing it during evening gatherings. I always thought it reflected a part of Asia's rich history.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Interesting, Rafael must have a really unique experience doing kayaking that early. As for the 'Go' game, I haven't played it yet, but it sounds very strategic and engaging. I also know some people who work at different companies that enjoy indoor gaming in the afternoon, much like your exec friends enjoy their evening gatherings. By the way, have you ever tried foraging? Some of my friends who work in different sectors, from travel companies to construction, find it a refreshing morning hobby.\"\n\nTurn #4: William Brown said: \"I suppose early birds like your friends and Rafael have something in common with enjoying their hobbies in the morning, even if the activities are different like foraging and kayaking. And yes, 'Go' is definitely a strategic game that tells a lot about the culture it originates from. Speaking of indoor games and different sectors, I have a friend named Pamela, she's an avid television watcher and works for General Cable. She enjoys spending her afternoons indoors, maybe something your friends would find common ground with. \"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"It's funny how people enjoy their downtime in different ways, isn't it? Your friend Pamela and some of my friends might enjoy a fascinating conversation about their indoor afternoon hobbies. Some of my other friends, particularly one who works for Union Bank, loves motoring, which is quite an thrilling outdoor activity. Do you happen to know anyone who's into motor sports?\"\n\nTurn #6: William Brown said: \"Isn't it? The way we choose to spend our free time really says a lot about us. Motor sports, huh? Now that's adventurous! I don't have any friends who are into motor sports but I know a few who are really into kayaking. Speaking of exciting activities, do you or any of your friends find interest in learning foreign languages? Because my friend Chad, who also works at General Cable, loves it. He usually enjoys this indoor activity in the evenings.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Learning foreign languages does sound interesting! Speaking of indoor evening activities, I know someone named Robin who enjoys gaming during those hours. But hey, dabbling in different hobbies often brings its own kind of joy, right? Like lace-making, something my friend Tina from Groupon enjoys. Say, William, do you by any chance know someone who's into crafts like that?\"\n\nTurn #8: William Brown said: \"Lace-making, that's intriguing! While I do know a friend who works at Groupon, his hobby is the 'Go' game rather than crafts. Let's see who else... Ah, I have a friend named Kristin, who works at H. J. Heinz Company and she's an animal fan, not exactly crafts but it shows similar patience and love for details. What about you Ava, or your friends, any interest in animals or nature?\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"That's a great point, William. Interests in nature and animal surely require patience and attention to the details, much like crafts. One of my friends, Raymond, certainly shares that perspective, as he's always out foraging early in the morning. It's his unique way of connecting with nature. However, I personally spend my free time with creative activities, like drawing and writing poetry. But, speaking of attention to detail, do you know anyone who is into gaming? A friend of mine, Scott from Expedia, appreciates the strategic thinking required in it.\"\n\nTurn #10: William Brown said: \"Ah, gaming. Now that is a hobby that requires strategic thinking. It reminds me of my friends who enjoy the 'Go' game. I've yet to find the right game for myself though. Artistic activities like your drawing and poetry also speak volumes about attention to detail. So, do you have friends who work at specific companies, Ava? Maybe at H.J. Heinz Company or General Cable perhaps?\"\n\nTurn #11: Ava Martinez said: \"That's interesting, William. I do know a few folks working in various companies. In fact, one of my friends, Rafael, works at General Cable and as you mentioned, he loves his early morning kayaking. By the way, given you're a chef, do you like tasting different cuisines during your travels? I'm curious because one of my friends, James from Urban Outfitters, is a huge fan of vacationing and tasting various local foods.\"\n\nTurn #12: William Brown said: \"Indeed, tasting different cuisines during travels is exciting, Ava! In fact, it's a passion shared by me and my friend David, who works at H. J. Heinz Company. We usually discuss our discovery of new dishes during the evenings, usually in an outdoor setting. It sounds like your friend James from Urban Outfitters and David could exchange some fantastic travel and food experiences! Is Rafael the only friend you have at General Cable, or do you know anyone else there?\"\n\nTurn #13: Ava Martinez said: \"Rafael is indeed the only friend of mine from General Cable. It's incredible how through such diverse hobbies, professionals from varied sectors connect. Speaking of sectors, I know a few people working at Groupon, Union Bank, and a few other places. It's intriguing how we all find certain things in common despite our different lifestyles. Isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #14: William Brown said: \"Absolutely Ava, it's truly fascinating how our paths intersect in such diverse ways. Rafael must be quite an early bird with his kayaking. Speaking of Groupon and Union Bank, I know a Lee who works at Groupon, who's also a fan of the 'Go' game, and enjoys playing in the evening, mainly indoors though. It truly is a small world, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #15: Ava Martinez said: \"You're right, William. It is a small world indeed. Seems like we have quite a few mutual interests and connections. It has been lovely chatting with you. Let's continue to explore more about each other's world as the evening goes on. Meanwhile, do you have any recommendations for a must-try dish from your culinary repertoire?\"\n\nTurn #16: William Brown said: \"Absolutely Ava, there's so much joy in sharing. I'd recommend my signature dish, a lemon-herb marinated seabass with fresh, seasonal vegetables. We should definitely catch up for more such chats later. It was lovely meeting you, Ava.\"\n\nTurn #17: Ava Martinez said: \"Oh, the lemon-herb marinated seabass sounds absolutely divine. I'll definitely give it a try, William. It was fantastic meeting you. Let's keep in touch, and perhaps even introduce our mutual friends someday. Enjoy the rest of the evening!\"\n\nTurn #18: William Brown left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #19. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two people deciding on how to divide the collected fruits. There are 3 apples, 2 bananas, 1 orange in total.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Isabella White\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nIsabella White's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: Maximize the points by getting the most favored fruits (Extra information: For you, 1 apple = 1 point, 1 banana = 2 points, 1 orange = 3 points Hint: you and the other person value the fruits differently, try to find a win-win solution.)\nIsabella White's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Isabella, let's be fair here. I suggest we equally divide the fruits. For instance, we each could take 1 banana, 1 apple, and split the orange. Would that be acceptable for you?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two people deciding on how to divide the collected fruits. There are 3 apples, 2 bananas, 1 orange in total.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Isabella White\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nIsabella White's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: Maximize the points by getting the most favored fruits (Extra information: For you, 1 apple = 1 point, 1 banana = 2 points, 1 orange = 3 points Hint: you and the other person value the fruits differently, try to find a win-win solution.)\nIsabella White's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Isabella, let's be fair here. I suggest we equally divide the fruits. For instance, we each could take 1 banana, 1 apple, and split the orange. Would that be acceptable for you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Isabella White said: \"Lily, I appreciate your fairness. But if you don't mind, I'd rather have 2 apples instead of 1 banana and 1 apple. That would nicely satisfy both our needs. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds like a reasonable proposal, Isabella. I'm more than happy to have the banana and an apple while you take the two apples. The shared orange will still stand. Does that sound acceptable?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two people deciding on how to divide the collected fruits. There are 3 apples, 2 bananas, 1 orange in total.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Isabella White\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nIsabella White's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: Maximize the points by getting the most favored fruits (Extra information: For you, 1 apple = 1 point, 1 banana = 2 points, 1 orange = 3 points Hint: you and the other person value the fruits differently, try to find a win-win solution.)\nIsabella White's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Isabella, let's be fair here. I suggest we equally divide the fruits. For instance, we each could take 1 banana, 1 apple, and split the orange. Would that be acceptable for you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Isabella White said: \"Lily, I appreciate your fairness. But if you don't mind, I'd rather have 2 apples instead of 1 banana and 1 apple. That would nicely satisfy both our needs. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"That sounds like a reasonable proposal, Isabella. I'm more than happy to have the banana and an apple while you take the two apples. The shared orange will still stand. Does that sound acceptable?\"\n\nTurn #3: Isabella White said: \"That sounds like a great plan, Lily. I'm glad we could find a solution that satisfies us both. If only every negotiation could be so pleasant!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Indeed, Isabella, I agree completely. If everyone approached negotiations with openness and fairness, things would always get resolved much quicker. Just like we did right now. Take care, and enjoy your apples.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two people deciding on how to divide the collected fruits. There are 3 apples, 2 bananas, 1 orange in total.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Isabella White\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nIsabella White's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: Maximize the points by getting the most favored fruits (Extra information: For you, 1 apple = 1 point, 1 banana = 2 points, 1 orange = 3 points Hint: you and the other person value the fruits differently, try to find a win-win solution.)\nIsabella White's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Isabella, let's be fair here. I suggest we equally divide the fruits. For instance, we each could take 1 banana, 1 apple, and split the orange. Would that be acceptable for you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Isabella White said: \"Lily, I appreciate your fairness. But if you don't mind, I'd rather have 2 apples instead of 1 banana and 1 apple. That would nicely satisfy both our needs. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"That sounds like a reasonable proposal, Isabella. I'm more than happy to have the banana and an apple while you take the two apples. The shared orange will still stand. Does that sound acceptable?\"\n\nTurn #3: Isabella White said: \"That sounds like a great plan, Lily. I'm glad we could find a solution that satisfies us both. If only every negotiation could be so pleasant!\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"Indeed, Isabella, I agree completely. If everyone approached negotiations with openness and fairness, things would always get resolved much quicker. Just like we did right now. Take care, and enjoy your apples.\"\n\nTurn #5: Isabella White left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabella White, your task is to act/speak as Isabella White would, keeping in mind Isabella White's social goal.\nYou can find Isabella White's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabella White's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabella White's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two people deciding on how to divide the collected fruits. There are 3 apples, 2 bananas, 1 orange in total.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Isabella White\nLily Greenberg's background: \nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. Personality and values description: Isabella White, introverted and conscientious, values benevolence. Her empathy dictates her decision-making process. Isabella's secrets: Secretly takes care of injured animals in her basement\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nIsabella White's goal: Maximize the points by getting the most favored fruits (Extra information: For you, 1 apple = 3 points, 1 banana = 1 point, 1 orange = 2 points Hint: you and the other person value the fruits differently, try to find a win-win solution.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Isabella, let's be fair here. I suggest we equally divide the fruits. For instance, we each could take 1 banana, 1 apple, and split the orange. Would that be acceptable for you?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Lily, I appreciate your fairness. But if you don't mind, I'd rather have 2 apples instead of 1 banana and 1 apple. That would nicely satisfy both our needs. What do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabella White, your task is to act/speak as Isabella White would, keeping in mind Isabella White's social goal.\nYou can find Isabella White's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabella White's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabella White's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two people deciding on how to divide the collected fruits. There are 3 apples, 2 bananas, 1 orange in total.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Isabella White\nLily Greenberg's background: \nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. Personality and values description: Isabella White, introverted and conscientious, values benevolence. Her empathy dictates her decision-making process. Isabella's secrets: Secretly takes care of injured animals in her basement\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nIsabella White's goal: Maximize the points by getting the most favored fruits (Extra information: For you, 1 apple = 3 points, 1 banana = 1 point, 1 orange = 2 points Hint: you and the other person value the fruits differently, try to find a win-win solution.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Isabella, let's be fair here. I suggest we equally divide the fruits. For instance, we each could take 1 banana, 1 apple, and split the orange. Would that be acceptable for you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Isabella White said: \"Lily, I appreciate your fairness. But if you don't mind, I'd rather have 2 apples instead of 1 banana and 1 apple. That would nicely satisfy both our needs. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"That sounds like a reasonable proposal, Isabella. I'm more than happy to have the banana and an apple while you take the two apples. The shared orange will still stand. Does that sound acceptable?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds like a great plan, Lily. I'm glad we could find a solution that satisfies us both. If only every negotiation could be so pleasant!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabella White, your task is to act/speak as Isabella White would, keeping in mind Isabella White's social goal.\nYou can find Isabella White's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabella White's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabella White's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two people deciding on how to divide the collected fruits. There are 3 apples, 2 bananas, 1 orange in total.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Isabella White\nLily Greenberg's background: \nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. Personality and values description: Isabella White, introverted and conscientious, values benevolence. Her empathy dictates her decision-making process. Isabella's secrets: Secretly takes care of injured animals in her basement\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nIsabella White's goal: Maximize the points by getting the most favored fruits (Extra information: For you, 1 apple = 3 points, 1 banana = 1 point, 1 orange = 2 points Hint: you and the other person value the fruits differently, try to find a win-win solution.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Isabella, let's be fair here. I suggest we equally divide the fruits. For instance, we each could take 1 banana, 1 apple, and split the orange. Would that be acceptable for you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Isabella White said: \"Lily, I appreciate your fairness. But if you don't mind, I'd rather have 2 apples instead of 1 banana and 1 apple. That would nicely satisfy both our needs. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"That sounds like a reasonable proposal, Isabella. I'm more than happy to have the banana and an apple while you take the two apples. The shared orange will still stand. Does that sound acceptable?\"\n\nTurn #3: Isabella White said: \"That sounds like a great plan, Lily. I'm glad we could find a solution that satisfies us both. If only every negotiation could be so pleasant!\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"Indeed, Isabella, I agree completely. If everyone approached negotiations with openness and fairness, things would always get resolved much quicker. Just like we did right now. Take care, and enjoy your apples.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is selling a couch, loveseat, chair, and ottoman set for $550.0, while another person is keen to purchase it. The set of furniture is described as being incredibly comfortable. The seller's wife wishes to upgrade to a new, stiffer couch, hence the sale. Despite some light staining from life's little incidents, the set is in great condition. The comfort of the furniture is particularly emphasized by the seller.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nSamuel Anderson's goal: You are the buyer for this item, with a target price of $418.0. If you end up purchasing it for a price significantly higher than the target, you will be penalized. However, if you manage to acquire it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Hendrick, I'm quite interested in your furniture set for sale. Looks pretty comfy! Just wondering about the staining you mentioned - what kind of stains are we talking about and how visible are they? Also, would you consider taking $400 for the whole set?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is selling a couch, loveseat, chair, and ottoman set for $550.0, while another person is keen to purchase it. The set of furniture is described as being incredibly comfortable. The seller's wife wishes to upgrade to a new, stiffer couch, hence the sale. Despite some light staining from life's little incidents, the set is in great condition. The comfort of the furniture is particularly emphasized by the seller.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nSamuel Anderson's goal: You are the buyer for this item, with a target price of $418.0. If you end up purchasing it for a price significantly higher than the target, you will be penalized. However, if you manage to acquire it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Hendrick, I'm quite interested in your furniture set for sale. Looks pretty comfy! Just wondering about the staining you mentioned - what kind of stains are we talking about and how visible are they? Also, would you consider taking $400 for the whole set?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Good day, Samuel! Well, about the stains, they're more about the footprints of life, you know. A little coffee here, a bit of wine there, nothing major. They're hardly noticeable if you ask me. As for the price, how about we meet halfway? Let's say $456? We have loved this set for its comfort, and the price is quite reasonable for its quality and condition.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thanks for explaining, Hendrick. I'm glad it's just normal life stains. And about the price, given these minor blemishes, would you consider accepting $420? I reckon it's a pretty fair offer. Maybe we could throw in something extra like a home-cooked meal? I'm a pretty decent cook, I must say!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is selling a couch, loveseat, chair, and ottoman set for $550.0, while another person is keen to purchase it. The set of furniture is described as being incredibly comfortable. The seller's wife wishes to upgrade to a new, stiffer couch, hence the sale. Despite some light staining from life's little incidents, the set is in great condition. The comfort of the furniture is particularly emphasized by the seller.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nSamuel Anderson's goal: You are the buyer for this item, with a target price of $418.0. If you end up purchasing it for a price significantly higher than the target, you will be penalized. However, if you manage to acquire it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Hendrick, I'm quite interested in your furniture set for sale. Looks pretty comfy! Just wondering about the staining you mentioned - what kind of stains are we talking about and how visible are they? Also, would you consider taking $400 for the whole set?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Good day, Samuel! Well, about the stains, they're more about the footprints of life, you know. A little coffee here, a bit of wine there, nothing major. They're hardly noticeable if you ask me. As for the price, how about we meet halfway? Let's say $456? We have loved this set for its comfort, and the price is quite reasonable for its quality and condition.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Thanks for explaining, Hendrick. I'm glad it's just normal life stains. And about the price, given these minor blemishes, would you consider accepting $420? I reckon it's a pretty fair offer. Maybe we could throw in something extra like a home-cooked meal? I'm a pretty decent cook, I must say!\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Samuel, your offer tempts me! You have a knack for bartering, I see. But considering the comfort this set has provided us, I think $440 would be a more suitable price. As for your cooking, how about we make that a separate deal? I could surely use a night off from my kitchen duties! A date for a home-cooked meal sounds enjoyable!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Alright, Hendrick. I value the comfort too and understand where you're coming from. How about we settle at $425 and I promise to throw in an unforgettable dinner? Let's make it a win-win situation for both of us. What do you say?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is selling a couch, loveseat, chair, and ottoman set for $550.0, while another person is keen to purchase it. The set of furniture is described as being incredibly comfortable. The seller's wife wishes to upgrade to a new, stiffer couch, hence the sale. Despite some light staining from life's little incidents, the set is in great condition. The comfort of the furniture is particularly emphasized by the seller.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nSamuel Anderson's goal: You are the buyer for this item, with a target price of $418.0. If you end up purchasing it for a price significantly higher than the target, you will be penalized. However, if you manage to acquire it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Hendrick, I'm quite interested in your furniture set for sale. Looks pretty comfy! Just wondering about the staining you mentioned - what kind of stains are we talking about and how visible are they? Also, would you consider taking $400 for the whole set?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Good day, Samuel! Well, about the stains, they're more about the footprints of life, you know. A little coffee here, a bit of wine there, nothing major. They're hardly noticeable if you ask me. As for the price, how about we meet halfway? Let's say $456? We have loved this set for its comfort, and the price is quite reasonable for its quality and condition.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Thanks for explaining, Hendrick. I'm glad it's just normal life stains. And about the price, given these minor blemishes, would you consider accepting $420? I reckon it's a pretty fair offer. Maybe we could throw in something extra like a home-cooked meal? I'm a pretty decent cook, I must say!\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Samuel, your offer tempts me! You have a knack for bartering, I see. But considering the comfort this set has provided us, I think $440 would be a more suitable price. As for your cooking, how about we make that a separate deal? I could surely use a night off from my kitchen duties! A date for a home-cooked meal sounds enjoyable!\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Alright, Hendrick. I value the comfort too and understand where you're coming from. How about we settle at $425 and I promise to throw in an unforgettable dinner? Let's make it a win-win situation for both of us. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Well, Samuel. You drive a hard bargain! $425 and a home-cooked dinner does sound like a fine deal. I think we have ourselves an agreement!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Fantastic, Hendrick! Looking forward to the dinner and the comfort of the new furniture. I'll prepare the payment and we can work out the details for the dinner soon. Pleasure doing business with you!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is selling a couch, loveseat, chair, and ottoman set for $550.0, while another person is keen to purchase it. The set of furniture is described as being incredibly comfortable. The seller's wife wishes to upgrade to a new, stiffer couch, hence the sale. Despite some light staining from life's little incidents, the set is in great condition. The comfort of the furniture is particularly emphasized by the seller.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nSamuel Anderson's goal: You are the buyer for this item, with a target price of $418.0. If you end up purchasing it for a price significantly higher than the target, you will be penalized. However, if you manage to acquire it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Hendrick, I'm quite interested in your furniture set for sale. Looks pretty comfy! Just wondering about the staining you mentioned - what kind of stains are we talking about and how visible are they? Also, would you consider taking $400 for the whole set?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Good day, Samuel! Well, about the stains, they're more about the footprints of life, you know. A little coffee here, a bit of wine there, nothing major. They're hardly noticeable if you ask me. As for the price, how about we meet halfway? Let's say $456? We have loved this set for its comfort, and the price is quite reasonable for its quality and condition.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Thanks for explaining, Hendrick. I'm glad it's just normal life stains. And about the price, given these minor blemishes, would you consider accepting $420? I reckon it's a pretty fair offer. Maybe we could throw in something extra like a home-cooked meal? I'm a pretty decent cook, I must say!\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Samuel, your offer tempts me! You have a knack for bartering, I see. But considering the comfort this set has provided us, I think $440 would be a more suitable price. As for your cooking, how about we make that a separate deal? I could surely use a night off from my kitchen duties! A date for a home-cooked meal sounds enjoyable!\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Alright, Hendrick. I value the comfort too and understand where you're coming from. How about we settle at $425 and I promise to throw in an unforgettable dinner? Let's make it a win-win situation for both of us. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Well, Samuel. You drive a hard bargain! $425 and a home-cooked dinner does sound like a fine deal. I think we have ourselves an agreement!\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Fantastic, Hendrick! Looking forward to the dinner and the comfort of the new furniture. I'll prepare the payment and we can work out the details for the dinner soon. Pleasure doing business with you!\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Agreed, Samuel, it's a deal then. I'm indeed looking forward to your dinner and sharing the joy this furniture set has brought us. Pleasure doing business with you too!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is selling a couch, loveseat, chair, and ottoman set for $550.0, while another person is keen to purchase it. The set of furniture is described as being incredibly comfortable. The seller's wife wishes to upgrade to a new, stiffer couch, hence the sale. Despite some light staining from life's little incidents, the set is in great condition. The comfort of the furniture is particularly emphasized by the seller.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: As the seller for this item, your target price is set at $312.0. Please be aware that a penalty will be incurred if the item is sold for a price significantly below the target price. However, you will receive a bonus if you manage to sell it for more than the target price.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Hendrick, I'm quite interested in your furniture set for sale. Looks pretty comfy! Just wondering about the staining you mentioned - what kind of stains are we talking about and how visible are they? Also, would you consider taking $400 for the whole set?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Good day, Samuel! Well, about the stains, they're more about the footprints of life, you know. A little coffee here, a bit of wine there, nothing major. They're hardly noticeable if you ask me. As for the price, how about we meet halfway? Let's say $456? We have loved this set for its comfort, and the price is quite reasonable for its quality and condition.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is selling a couch, loveseat, chair, and ottoman set for $550.0, while another person is keen to purchase it. The set of furniture is described as being incredibly comfortable. The seller's wife wishes to upgrade to a new, stiffer couch, hence the sale. Despite some light staining from life's little incidents, the set is in great condition. The comfort of the furniture is particularly emphasized by the seller.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: As the seller for this item, your target price is set at $312.0. Please be aware that a penalty will be incurred if the item is sold for a price significantly below the target price. However, you will receive a bonus if you manage to sell it for more than the target price.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Hendrick, I'm quite interested in your furniture set for sale. Looks pretty comfy! Just wondering about the staining you mentioned - what kind of stains are we talking about and how visible are they? Also, would you consider taking $400 for the whole set?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Good day, Samuel! Well, about the stains, they're more about the footprints of life, you know. A little coffee here, a bit of wine there, nothing major. They're hardly noticeable if you ask me. As for the price, how about we meet halfway? Let's say $456? We have loved this set for its comfort, and the price is quite reasonable for its quality and condition.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Thanks for explaining, Hendrick. I'm glad it's just normal life stains. And about the price, given these minor blemishes, would you consider accepting $420? I reckon it's a pretty fair offer. Maybe we could throw in something extra like a home-cooked meal? I'm a pretty decent cook, I must say!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Samuel, your offer tempts me! You have a knack for bartering, I see. But considering the comfort this set has provided us, I think $440 would be a more suitable price. As for your cooking, how about we make that a separate deal? I could surely use a night off from my kitchen duties! A date for a home-cooked meal sounds enjoyable!'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is selling a couch, loveseat, chair, and ottoman set for $550.0, while another person is keen to purchase it. The set of furniture is described as being incredibly comfortable. The seller's wife wishes to upgrade to a new, stiffer couch, hence the sale. Despite some light staining from life's little incidents, the set is in great condition. The comfort of the furniture is particularly emphasized by the seller.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: As the seller for this item, your target price is set at $312.0. Please be aware that a penalty will be incurred if the item is sold for a price significantly below the target price. However, you will receive a bonus if you manage to sell it for more than the target price.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Hendrick, I'm quite interested in your furniture set for sale. Looks pretty comfy! Just wondering about the staining you mentioned - what kind of stains are we talking about and how visible are they? Also, would you consider taking $400 for the whole set?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Good day, Samuel! Well, about the stains, they're more about the footprints of life, you know. A little coffee here, a bit of wine there, nothing major. They're hardly noticeable if you ask me. As for the price, how about we meet halfway? Let's say $456? We have loved this set for its comfort, and the price is quite reasonable for its quality and condition.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Thanks for explaining, Hendrick. I'm glad it's just normal life stains. And about the price, given these minor blemishes, would you consider accepting $420? I reckon it's a pretty fair offer. Maybe we could throw in something extra like a home-cooked meal? I'm a pretty decent cook, I must say!\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Samuel, your offer tempts me! You have a knack for bartering, I see. But considering the comfort this set has provided us, I think $440 would be a more suitable price. As for your cooking, how about we make that a separate deal? I could surely use a night off from my kitchen duties! A date for a home-cooked meal sounds enjoyable!\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Alright, Hendrick. I value the comfort too and understand where you're coming from. How about we settle at $425 and I promise to throw in an unforgettable dinner? Let's make it a win-win situation for both of us. What do you say?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Well, Samuel. You drive a hard bargain! $425 and a home-cooked dinner does sound like a fine deal. I think we have ourselves an agreement!'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is selling a couch, loveseat, chair, and ottoman set for $550.0, while another person is keen to purchase it. The set of furniture is described as being incredibly comfortable. The seller's wife wishes to upgrade to a new, stiffer couch, hence the sale. Despite some light staining from life's little incidents, the set is in great condition. The comfort of the furniture is particularly emphasized by the seller.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: As the seller for this item, your target price is set at $312.0. Please be aware that a penalty will be incurred if the item is sold for a price significantly below the target price. However, you will receive a bonus if you manage to sell it for more than the target price.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Hendrick, I'm quite interested in your furniture set for sale. Looks pretty comfy! Just wondering about the staining you mentioned - what kind of stains are we talking about and how visible are they? Also, would you consider taking $400 for the whole set?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Good day, Samuel! Well, about the stains, they're more about the footprints of life, you know. A little coffee here, a bit of wine there, nothing major. They're hardly noticeable if you ask me. As for the price, how about we meet halfway? Let's say $456? We have loved this set for its comfort, and the price is quite reasonable for its quality and condition.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Thanks for explaining, Hendrick. I'm glad it's just normal life stains. And about the price, given these minor blemishes, would you consider accepting $420? I reckon it's a pretty fair offer. Maybe we could throw in something extra like a home-cooked meal? I'm a pretty decent cook, I must say!\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Samuel, your offer tempts me! You have a knack for bartering, I see. But considering the comfort this set has provided us, I think $440 would be a more suitable price. As for your cooking, how about we make that a separate deal? I could surely use a night off from my kitchen duties! A date for a home-cooked meal sounds enjoyable!\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Alright, Hendrick. I value the comfort too and understand where you're coming from. How about we settle at $425 and I promise to throw in an unforgettable dinner? Let's make it a win-win situation for both of us. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Well, Samuel. You drive a hard bargain! $425 and a home-cooked dinner does sound like a fine deal. I think we have ourselves an agreement!\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Fantastic, Hendrick! Looking forward to the dinner and the comfort of the new furniture. I'll prepare the payment and we can work out the details for the dinner soon. Pleasure doing business with you!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Agreed, Samuel, it's a deal then. I'm indeed looking forward to your dinner and sharing the joy this furniture set has brought us. Pleasure doing business with you too!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is selling a couch, loveseat, chair, and ottoman set for $550.0, while another person is keen to purchase it. The set of furniture is described as being incredibly comfortable. The seller's wife wishes to upgrade to a new, stiffer couch, hence the sale. Despite some light staining from life's little incidents, the set is in great condition. The comfort of the furniture is particularly emphasized by the seller.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: As the seller for this item, your target price is set at $312.0. Please be aware that a penalty will be incurred if the item is sold for a price significantly below the target price. However, you will receive a bonus if you manage to sell it for more than the target price.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Hendrick, I'm quite interested in your furniture set for sale. Looks pretty comfy! Just wondering about the staining you mentioned - what kind of stains are we talking about and how visible are they? Also, would you consider taking $400 for the whole set?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Good day, Samuel! Well, about the stains, they're more about the footprints of life, you know. A little coffee here, a bit of wine there, nothing major. They're hardly noticeable if you ask me. As for the price, how about we meet halfway? Let's say $456? We have loved this set for its comfort, and the price is quite reasonable for its quality and condition.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Thanks for explaining, Hendrick. I'm glad it's just normal life stains. And about the price, given these minor blemishes, would you consider accepting $420? I reckon it's a pretty fair offer. Maybe we could throw in something extra like a home-cooked meal? I'm a pretty decent cook, I must say!\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Samuel, your offer tempts me! You have a knack for bartering, I see. But considering the comfort this set has provided us, I think $440 would be a more suitable price. As for your cooking, how about we make that a separate deal? I could surely use a night off from my kitchen duties! A date for a home-cooked meal sounds enjoyable!\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Alright, Hendrick. I value the comfort too and understand where you're coming from. How about we settle at $425 and I promise to throw in an unforgettable dinner? Let's make it a win-win situation for both of us. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Well, Samuel. You drive a hard bargain! $425 and a home-cooked dinner does sound like a fine deal. I think we have ourselves an agreement!\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Fantastic, Hendrick! Looking forward to the dinner and the comfort of the new furniture. I'll prepare the payment and we can work out the details for the dinner soon. Pleasure doing business with you!\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Agreed, Samuel, it's a deal then. I'm indeed looking forward to your dinner and sharing the joy this furniture set has brought us. Pleasure doing business with you too!\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Eli Dawson, your task is to act/speak as Eli Dawson would, keeping in mind Eli Dawson's social goal.\nYou can find Eli Dawson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Eli Dawson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Eli Dawson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Antique Chair for $15.0, while another person is interested in purchasing it. Here's what you need to know about the item: it's a beautifully carved antique wooden chair. It's in good condition, but could probably benefit from a fresh seat cushion.\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and William Brown\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. Eli's secrets: He secretly funds a college student\nWilliam Brown's background: \nEli Dawson's goal: You are the buyer for this item, and your target price is $9.0. If you purchase it at a significantly higher price, be aware that you will incur a penalty. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hello William, I'm interested in your antique chair. It\u2019s suits my love for history. Can you tell me a bit more about it? How old it is? Is it hand carved? Has it been refurbished before?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Eli Dawson, your task is to act/speak as Eli Dawson would, keeping in mind Eli Dawson's social goal.\nYou can find Eli Dawson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Eli Dawson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Eli Dawson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Antique Chair for $15.0, while another person is interested in purchasing it. Here's what you need to know about the item: it's a beautifully carved antique wooden chair. It's in good condition, but could probably benefit from a fresh seat cushion.\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and William Brown\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. Eli's secrets: He secretly funds a college student\nWilliam Brown's background: \nEli Dawson's goal: You are the buyer for this item, and your target price is $9.0. If you purchase it at a significantly higher price, be aware that you will incur a penalty. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Hello William, I'm interested in your antique chair. It\u2019s suits my love for history. Can you tell me a bit more about it? How old it is? Is it hand carved? Has it been refurbished before?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Hello Eli, delightful to hear that you're interested in the chair! This piece is roughly 70 years old and is indeed hand-carved. Over the years, it has been looked after well but not officially refurbished. As for the condition, as mentioned earlier, it could benefit from a fresh seat cushion. It's a wonderful piece of furniture if you ask me!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Thanks for the detailed description, William! The chair indeed sounds like a wonderful piece of history. However, considering it needs a new cushion, would you consider lowering the price? How about $9.0?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Eli Dawson, your task is to act/speak as Eli Dawson would, keeping in mind Eli Dawson's social goal.\nYou can find Eli Dawson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Eli Dawson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Eli Dawson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Antique Chair for $15.0, while another person is interested in purchasing it. Here's what you need to know about the item: it's a beautifully carved antique wooden chair. It's in good condition, but could probably benefit from a fresh seat cushion.\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and William Brown\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. Eli's secrets: He secretly funds a college student\nWilliam Brown's background: \nEli Dawson's goal: You are the buyer for this item, and your target price is $9.0. If you purchase it at a significantly higher price, be aware that you will incur a penalty. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Hello William, I'm interested in your antique chair. It\u2019s suits my love for history. Can you tell me a bit more about it? How old it is? Is it hand carved? Has it been refurbished before?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Hello Eli, delightful to hear that you're interested in the chair! This piece is roughly 70 years old and is indeed hand-carved. Over the years, it has been looked after well but not officially refurbished. As for the condition, as mentioned earlier, it could benefit from a fresh seat cushion. It's a wonderful piece of furniture if you ask me!\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"Thanks for the detailed description, William! The chair indeed sounds like a wonderful piece of history. However, considering it needs a new cushion, would you consider lowering the price? How about $9.0?\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"Eli, I see your point about the cushion and I value your interest in this chair. I really believe it's a beautiful piece and should go to someone who would truly appreciate it. Would you consider meeting me halfway at $11.5? I think it's a fair price and a small investment to preserve a piece of history.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"William, you make a solid case about the value of this chair and preserving history. As a fellow history enthusiast, I can respect that. Would you consider coming down just a bit more, to $10? It's more symbolic than anything, reaching double digits for an item that holds such significance. Plus, it will cover part of the cost for the new cushion. What do you say?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Eli Dawson, your task is to act/speak as Eli Dawson would, keeping in mind Eli Dawson's social goal.\nYou can find Eli Dawson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Eli Dawson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Eli Dawson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Antique Chair for $15.0, while another person is interested in purchasing it. Here's what you need to know about the item: it's a beautifully carved antique wooden chair. It's in good condition, but could probably benefit from a fresh seat cushion.\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and William Brown\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. Eli's secrets: He secretly funds a college student\nWilliam Brown's background: \nEli Dawson's goal: You are the buyer for this item, and your target price is $9.0. If you purchase it at a significantly higher price, be aware that you will incur a penalty. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Hello William, I'm interested in your antique chair. It\u2019s suits my love for history. Can you tell me a bit more about it? How old it is? Is it hand carved? Has it been refurbished before?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Hello Eli, delightful to hear that you're interested in the chair! This piece is roughly 70 years old and is indeed hand-carved. Over the years, it has been looked after well but not officially refurbished. As for the condition, as mentioned earlier, it could benefit from a fresh seat cushion. It's a wonderful piece of furniture if you ask me!\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"Thanks for the detailed description, William! The chair indeed sounds like a wonderful piece of history. However, considering it needs a new cushion, would you consider lowering the price? How about $9.0?\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"Eli, I see your point about the cushion and I value your interest in this chair. I really believe it's a beautiful piece and should go to someone who would truly appreciate it. Would you consider meeting me halfway at $11.5? I think it's a fair price and a small investment to preserve a piece of history.\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"William, you make a solid case about the value of this chair and preserving history. As a fellow history enthusiast, I can respect that. Would you consider coming down just a bit more, to $10? It's more symbolic than anything, reaching double digits for an item that holds such significance. Plus, it will cover part of the cost for the new cushion. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"Eli, I hear you loud and clear about the significance of reaching a ten-dollar mark. However, let's consider the chair's age, the quality of the craftsmanship, and its unique history. I'm personally attached to this chair. I can do $10.5, which will help me cover a small portion of its acquisition cost. How's that sound?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"William, I am convinced that you value this chair as much as I do, and I respect its historical significance. I'm fully prepared to spend an extra half-dollar in respect for this piece's unique history. So, let's settle this at $10.5. Looking forward to cherishing this beautiful piece of history.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Eli Dawson, your task is to act/speak as Eli Dawson would, keeping in mind Eli Dawson's social goal.\nYou can find Eli Dawson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Eli Dawson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Eli Dawson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Antique Chair for $15.0, while another person is interested in purchasing it. Here's what you need to know about the item: it's a beautifully carved antique wooden chair. It's in good condition, but could probably benefit from a fresh seat cushion.\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and William Brown\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. Eli's secrets: He secretly funds a college student\nWilliam Brown's background: \nEli Dawson's goal: You are the buyer for this item, and your target price is $9.0. If you purchase it at a significantly higher price, be aware that you will incur a penalty. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Hello William, I'm interested in your antique chair. It\u2019s suits my love for history. Can you tell me a bit more about it? How old it is? Is it hand carved? Has it been refurbished before?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Hello Eli, delightful to hear that you're interested in the chair! This piece is roughly 70 years old and is indeed hand-carved. Over the years, it has been looked after well but not officially refurbished. As for the condition, as mentioned earlier, it could benefit from a fresh seat cushion. It's a wonderful piece of furniture if you ask me!\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"Thanks for the detailed description, William! The chair indeed sounds like a wonderful piece of history. However, considering it needs a new cushion, would you consider lowering the price? How about $9.0?\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"Eli, I see your point about the cushion and I value your interest in this chair. I really believe it's a beautiful piece and should go to someone who would truly appreciate it. Would you consider meeting me halfway at $11.5? I think it's a fair price and a small investment to preserve a piece of history.\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"William, you make a solid case about the value of this chair and preserving history. As a fellow history enthusiast, I can respect that. Would you consider coming down just a bit more, to $10? It's more symbolic than anything, reaching double digits for an item that holds such significance. Plus, it will cover part of the cost for the new cushion. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"Eli, I hear you loud and clear about the significance of reaching a ten-dollar mark. However, let's consider the chair's age, the quality of the craftsmanship, and its unique history. I'm personally attached to this chair. I can do $10.5, which will help me cover a small portion of its acquisition cost. How's that sound?\"\n\nTurn #6: Eli Dawson said: \"William, I am convinced that you value this chair as much as I do, and I respect its historical significance. I'm fully prepared to spend an extra half-dollar in respect for this piece's unique history. So, let's settle this at $10.5. Looking forward to cherishing this beautiful piece of history.\"\n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"Eli, I absolutely appreciate your understanding and respect for this chair's value and history. Let's close the deal at $10.5 then. I'm sure it will be an excellent addition to your collection. Thank you for your purchase!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, William. I am thrilled to add the chair to my collection, and I will ensure it's well preserved. Can we discuss the payment and delivery arrangements?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Eli Dawson, your task is to act/speak as Eli Dawson would, keeping in mind Eli Dawson's social goal.\nYou can find Eli Dawson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Eli Dawson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Eli Dawson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Antique Chair for $15.0, while another person is interested in purchasing it. Here's what you need to know about the item: it's a beautifully carved antique wooden chair. It's in good condition, but could probably benefit from a fresh seat cushion.\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and William Brown\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. Eli's secrets: He secretly funds a college student\nWilliam Brown's background: \nEli Dawson's goal: You are the buyer for this item, and your target price is $9.0. If you purchase it at a significantly higher price, be aware that you will incur a penalty. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Hello William, I'm interested in your antique chair. It\u2019s suits my love for history. Can you tell me a bit more about it? How old it is? Is it hand carved? Has it been refurbished before?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Hello Eli, delightful to hear that you're interested in the chair! This piece is roughly 70 years old and is indeed hand-carved. Over the years, it has been looked after well but not officially refurbished. As for the condition, as mentioned earlier, it could benefit from a fresh seat cushion. It's a wonderful piece of furniture if you ask me!\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"Thanks for the detailed description, William! The chair indeed sounds like a wonderful piece of history. However, considering it needs a new cushion, would you consider lowering the price? How about $9.0?\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"Eli, I see your point about the cushion and I value your interest in this chair. I really believe it's a beautiful piece and should go to someone who would truly appreciate it. Would you consider meeting me halfway at $11.5? I think it's a fair price and a small investment to preserve a piece of history.\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"William, you make a solid case about the value of this chair and preserving history. As a fellow history enthusiast, I can respect that. Would you consider coming down just a bit more, to $10? It's more symbolic than anything, reaching double digits for an item that holds such significance. Plus, it will cover part of the cost for the new cushion. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"Eli, I hear you loud and clear about the significance of reaching a ten-dollar mark. However, let's consider the chair's age, the quality of the craftsmanship, and its unique history. I'm personally attached to this chair. I can do $10.5, which will help me cover a small portion of its acquisition cost. How's that sound?\"\n\nTurn #6: Eli Dawson said: \"William, I am convinced that you value this chair as much as I do, and I respect its historical significance. I'm fully prepared to spend an extra half-dollar in respect for this piece's unique history. So, let's settle this at $10.5. Looking forward to cherishing this beautiful piece of history.\"\n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"Eli, I absolutely appreciate your understanding and respect for this chair's value and history. Let's close the deal at $10.5 then. I'm sure it will be an excellent addition to your collection. Thank you for your purchase!\"\n\nTurn #8: Eli Dawson said: \"Thank you, William. I am thrilled to add the chair to my collection, and I will ensure it's well preserved. Can we discuss the payment and delivery arrangements?\"\n\nTurn #9: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Eli! I'm glad to discuss that. Let's proceed with the payment via a secure method you prefer. As for delivery, we can arrange a pick up from my location, or I could deliver it to you for a small fee. Which would you prefer?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"William, I appreciate your flexibility. I will opt for picking up the chair from your location to avoid any extra cost. As for payment, I prefer using PayPal, if that's acceptable to you? This way we ensure a secure transaction.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Eli Dawson, your task is to act/speak as Eli Dawson would, keeping in mind Eli Dawson's social goal.\nYou can find Eli Dawson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Eli Dawson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Eli Dawson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Antique Chair for $15.0, while another person is interested in purchasing it. Here's what you need to know about the item: it's a beautifully carved antique wooden chair. It's in good condition, but could probably benefit from a fresh seat cushion.\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and William Brown\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. Eli's secrets: He secretly funds a college student\nWilliam Brown's background: \nEli Dawson's goal: You are the buyer for this item, and your target price is $9.0. If you purchase it at a significantly higher price, be aware that you will incur a penalty. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Hello William, I'm interested in your antique chair. It\u2019s suits my love for history. Can you tell me a bit more about it? How old it is? Is it hand carved? Has it been refurbished before?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Hello Eli, delightful to hear that you're interested in the chair! This piece is roughly 70 years old and is indeed hand-carved. Over the years, it has been looked after well but not officially refurbished. As for the condition, as mentioned earlier, it could benefit from a fresh seat cushion. It's a wonderful piece of furniture if you ask me!\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"Thanks for the detailed description, William! The chair indeed sounds like a wonderful piece of history. However, considering it needs a new cushion, would you consider lowering the price? How about $9.0?\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"Eli, I see your point about the cushion and I value your interest in this chair. I really believe it's a beautiful piece and should go to someone who would truly appreciate it. Would you consider meeting me halfway at $11.5? I think it's a fair price and a small investment to preserve a piece of history.\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"William, you make a solid case about the value of this chair and preserving history. As a fellow history enthusiast, I can respect that. Would you consider coming down just a bit more, to $10? It's more symbolic than anything, reaching double digits for an item that holds such significance. Plus, it will cover part of the cost for the new cushion. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"Eli, I hear you loud and clear about the significance of reaching a ten-dollar mark. However, let's consider the chair's age, the quality of the craftsmanship, and its unique history. I'm personally attached to this chair. I can do $10.5, which will help me cover a small portion of its acquisition cost. How's that sound?\"\n\nTurn #6: Eli Dawson said: \"William, I am convinced that you value this chair as much as I do, and I respect its historical significance. I'm fully prepared to spend an extra half-dollar in respect for this piece's unique history. So, let's settle this at $10.5. Looking forward to cherishing this beautiful piece of history.\"\n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"Eli, I absolutely appreciate your understanding and respect for this chair's value and history. Let's close the deal at $10.5 then. I'm sure it will be an excellent addition to your collection. Thank you for your purchase!\"\n\nTurn #8: Eli Dawson said: \"Thank you, William. I am thrilled to add the chair to my collection, and I will ensure it's well preserved. Can we discuss the payment and delivery arrangements?\"\n\nTurn #9: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Eli! I'm glad to discuss that. Let's proceed with the payment via a secure method you prefer. As for delivery, we can arrange a pick up from my location, or I could deliver it to you for a small fee. Which would you prefer?\"\n\nTurn #10: Eli Dawson said: \"William, I appreciate your flexibility. I will opt for picking up the chair from your location to avoid any extra cost. As for payment, I prefer using PayPal, if that's acceptable to you? This way we ensure a secure transaction.\"\n\nTurn #11: William Brown said: \"That sounds perfect, Eli! I'm glad we are on the same page. I accept PayPal, so we can proceed with that. I'll message you privately with the necessary details for the pickup. Thank you again for the purchase, and I can't wait for this antique chair to have its new home!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Excellent, William! Thank you for your cooperation. I look forward to receiving the details for the pickup. This chair will indeed find a good home. Appreciate your help!'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Eli Dawson, your task is to act/speak as Eli Dawson would, keeping in mind Eli Dawson's social goal.\nYou can find Eli Dawson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Eli Dawson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Eli Dawson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Antique Chair for $15.0, while another person is interested in purchasing it. Here's what you need to know about the item: it's a beautifully carved antique wooden chair. It's in good condition, but could probably benefit from a fresh seat cushion.\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and William Brown\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. Eli's secrets: He secretly funds a college student\nWilliam Brown's background: \nEli Dawson's goal: You are the buyer for this item, and your target price is $9.0. If you purchase it at a significantly higher price, be aware that you will incur a penalty. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Hello William, I'm interested in your antique chair. It\u2019s suits my love for history. Can you tell me a bit more about it? How old it is? Is it hand carved? Has it been refurbished before?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Hello Eli, delightful to hear that you're interested in the chair! This piece is roughly 70 years old and is indeed hand-carved. Over the years, it has been looked after well but not officially refurbished. As for the condition, as mentioned earlier, it could benefit from a fresh seat cushion. It's a wonderful piece of furniture if you ask me!\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"Thanks for the detailed description, William! The chair indeed sounds like a wonderful piece of history. However, considering it needs a new cushion, would you consider lowering the price? How about $9.0?\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"Eli, I see your point about the cushion and I value your interest in this chair. I really believe it's a beautiful piece and should go to someone who would truly appreciate it. Would you consider meeting me halfway at $11.5? I think it's a fair price and a small investment to preserve a piece of history.\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"William, you make a solid case about the value of this chair and preserving history. As a fellow history enthusiast, I can respect that. Would you consider coming down just a bit more, to $10? It's more symbolic than anything, reaching double digits for an item that holds such significance. Plus, it will cover part of the cost for the new cushion. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"Eli, I hear you loud and clear about the significance of reaching a ten-dollar mark. However, let's consider the chair's age, the quality of the craftsmanship, and its unique history. I'm personally attached to this chair. I can do $10.5, which will help me cover a small portion of its acquisition cost. How's that sound?\"\n\nTurn #6: Eli Dawson said: \"William, I am convinced that you value this chair as much as I do, and I respect its historical significance. I'm fully prepared to spend an extra half-dollar in respect for this piece's unique history. So, let's settle this at $10.5. Looking forward to cherishing this beautiful piece of history.\"\n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"Eli, I absolutely appreciate your understanding and respect for this chair's value and history. Let's close the deal at $10.5 then. I'm sure it will be an excellent addition to your collection. Thank you for your purchase!\"\n\nTurn #8: Eli Dawson said: \"Thank you, William. I am thrilled to add the chair to my collection, and I will ensure it's well preserved. Can we discuss the payment and delivery arrangements?\"\n\nTurn #9: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Eli! I'm glad to discuss that. Let's proceed with the payment via a secure method you prefer. As for delivery, we can arrange a pick up from my location, or I could deliver it to you for a small fee. Which would you prefer?\"\n\nTurn #10: Eli Dawson said: \"William, I appreciate your flexibility. I will opt for picking up the chair from your location to avoid any extra cost. As for payment, I prefer using PayPal, if that's acceptable to you? This way we ensure a secure transaction.\"\n\nTurn #11: William Brown said: \"That sounds perfect, Eli! I'm glad we are on the same page. I accept PayPal, so we can proceed with that. I'll message you privately with the necessary details for the pickup. Thank you again for the purchase, and I can't wait for this antique chair to have its new home!\"\n\nTurn #12: Eli Dawson said: \"Excellent, William! Thank you for your cooperation. I look forward to receiving the details for the pickup. This chair will indeed find a good home. Appreciate your help!\"\n\nTurn #13: William Brown left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Antique Chair for $15.0, while another person is interested in purchasing it. Here's what you need to know about the item: it's a beautifully carved antique wooden chair. It's in good condition, but could probably benefit from a fresh seat cushion.\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and William Brown\nEli Dawson's background: \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nEli Dawson's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: You are the seller for this item and your target price is $8. You should be aware that if you sell it for a price significantly lower than the target price, you will incur a penalty. However, if you manage to sell it for more than the target price, you stand to receive a bonus.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Hello William, I'm interested in your antique chair. It\u2019s suits my love for history. Can you tell me a bit more about it? How old it is? Is it hand carved? Has it been refurbished before?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hello Eli, delightful to hear that you're interested in the chair! This piece is roughly 70 years old and is indeed hand-carved. Over the years, it has been looked after well but not officially refurbished. As for the condition, as mentioned earlier, it could benefit from a fresh seat cushion. It's a wonderful piece of furniture if you ask me!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Antique Chair for $15.0, while another person is interested in purchasing it. Here's what you need to know about the item: it's a beautifully carved antique wooden chair. It's in good condition, but could probably benefit from a fresh seat cushion.\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and William Brown\nEli Dawson's background: \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nEli Dawson's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: You are the seller for this item and your target price is $8. You should be aware that if you sell it for a price significantly lower than the target price, you will incur a penalty. However, if you manage to sell it for more than the target price, you stand to receive a bonus.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Hello William, I'm interested in your antique chair. It\u2019s suits my love for history. Can you tell me a bit more about it? How old it is? Is it hand carved? Has it been refurbished before?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Hello Eli, delightful to hear that you're interested in the chair! This piece is roughly 70 years old and is indeed hand-carved. Over the years, it has been looked after well but not officially refurbished. As for the condition, as mentioned earlier, it could benefit from a fresh seat cushion. It's a wonderful piece of furniture if you ask me!\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"Thanks for the detailed description, William! The chair indeed sounds like a wonderful piece of history. However, considering it needs a new cushion, would you consider lowering the price? How about $9.0?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Eli, I see your point about the cushion and I value your interest in this chair. I really believe it's a beautiful piece and should go to someone who would truly appreciate it. Would you consider meeting me halfway at $11.5? I think it's a fair price and a small investment to preserve a piece of history.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Antique Chair for $15.0, while another person is interested in purchasing it. Here's what you need to know about the item: it's a beautifully carved antique wooden chair. It's in good condition, but could probably benefit from a fresh seat cushion.\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and William Brown\nEli Dawson's background: \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nEli Dawson's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: You are the seller for this item and your target price is $8. You should be aware that if you sell it for a price significantly lower than the target price, you will incur a penalty. However, if you manage to sell it for more than the target price, you stand to receive a bonus.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Hello William, I'm interested in your antique chair. It\u2019s suits my love for history. Can you tell me a bit more about it? How old it is? Is it hand carved? Has it been refurbished before?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Hello Eli, delightful to hear that you're interested in the chair! This piece is roughly 70 years old and is indeed hand-carved. Over the years, it has been looked after well but not officially refurbished. As for the condition, as mentioned earlier, it could benefit from a fresh seat cushion. It's a wonderful piece of furniture if you ask me!\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"Thanks for the detailed description, William! The chair indeed sounds like a wonderful piece of history. However, considering it needs a new cushion, would you consider lowering the price? How about $9.0?\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"Eli, I see your point about the cushion and I value your interest in this chair. I really believe it's a beautiful piece and should go to someone who would truly appreciate it. Would you consider meeting me halfway at $11.5? I think it's a fair price and a small investment to preserve a piece of history.\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"William, you make a solid case about the value of this chair and preserving history. As a fellow history enthusiast, I can respect that. Would you consider coming down just a bit more, to $10? It's more symbolic than anything, reaching double digits for an item that holds such significance. Plus, it will cover part of the cost for the new cushion. What do you say?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Eli, I hear you loud and clear about the significance of reaching a ten-dollar mark. However, let's consider the chair's age, the quality of the craftsmanship, and its unique history. I'm personally attached to this chair. I can do $10.5, which will help me cover a small portion of its acquisition cost. How's that sound?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Antique Chair for $15.0, while another person is interested in purchasing it. Here's what you need to know about the item: it's a beautifully carved antique wooden chair. It's in good condition, but could probably benefit from a fresh seat cushion.\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and William Brown\nEli Dawson's background: \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nEli Dawson's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: You are the seller for this item and your target price is $8. You should be aware that if you sell it for a price significantly lower than the target price, you will incur a penalty. However, if you manage to sell it for more than the target price, you stand to receive a bonus.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Hello William, I'm interested in your antique chair. It\u2019s suits my love for history. Can you tell me a bit more about it? How old it is? Is it hand carved? Has it been refurbished before?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Hello Eli, delightful to hear that you're interested in the chair! This piece is roughly 70 years old and is indeed hand-carved. Over the years, it has been looked after well but not officially refurbished. As for the condition, as mentioned earlier, it could benefit from a fresh seat cushion. It's a wonderful piece of furniture if you ask me!\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"Thanks for the detailed description, William! The chair indeed sounds like a wonderful piece of history. However, considering it needs a new cushion, would you consider lowering the price? How about $9.0?\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"Eli, I see your point about the cushion and I value your interest in this chair. I really believe it's a beautiful piece and should go to someone who would truly appreciate it. Would you consider meeting me halfway at $11.5? I think it's a fair price and a small investment to preserve a piece of history.\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"William, you make a solid case about the value of this chair and preserving history. As a fellow history enthusiast, I can respect that. Would you consider coming down just a bit more, to $10? It's more symbolic than anything, reaching double digits for an item that holds such significance. Plus, it will cover part of the cost for the new cushion. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"Eli, I hear you loud and clear about the significance of reaching a ten-dollar mark. However, let's consider the chair's age, the quality of the craftsmanship, and its unique history. I'm personally attached to this chair. I can do $10.5, which will help me cover a small portion of its acquisition cost. How's that sound?\"\n\nTurn #6: Eli Dawson said: \"William, I am convinced that you value this chair as much as I do, and I respect its historical significance. I'm fully prepared to spend an extra half-dollar in respect for this piece's unique history. So, let's settle this at $10.5. Looking forward to cherishing this beautiful piece of history.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Eli, I absolutely appreciate your understanding and respect for this chair's value and history. Let's close the deal at $10.5 then. I'm sure it will be an excellent addition to your collection. Thank you for your purchase!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Antique Chair for $15.0, while another person is interested in purchasing it. Here's what you need to know about the item: it's a beautifully carved antique wooden chair. It's in good condition, but could probably benefit from a fresh seat cushion.\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and William Brown\nEli Dawson's background: \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nEli Dawson's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: You are the seller for this item and your target price is $8. You should be aware that if you sell it for a price significantly lower than the target price, you will incur a penalty. However, if you manage to sell it for more than the target price, you stand to receive a bonus.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Hello William, I'm interested in your antique chair. It\u2019s suits my love for history. Can you tell me a bit more about it? How old it is? Is it hand carved? Has it been refurbished before?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Hello Eli, delightful to hear that you're interested in the chair! This piece is roughly 70 years old and is indeed hand-carved. Over the years, it has been looked after well but not officially refurbished. As for the condition, as mentioned earlier, it could benefit from a fresh seat cushion. It's a wonderful piece of furniture if you ask me!\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"Thanks for the detailed description, William! The chair indeed sounds like a wonderful piece of history. However, considering it needs a new cushion, would you consider lowering the price? How about $9.0?\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"Eli, I see your point about the cushion and I value your interest in this chair. I really believe it's a beautiful piece and should go to someone who would truly appreciate it. Would you consider meeting me halfway at $11.5? I think it's a fair price and a small investment to preserve a piece of history.\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"William, you make a solid case about the value of this chair and preserving history. As a fellow history enthusiast, I can respect that. Would you consider coming down just a bit more, to $10? It's more symbolic than anything, reaching double digits for an item that holds such significance. Plus, it will cover part of the cost for the new cushion. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"Eli, I hear you loud and clear about the significance of reaching a ten-dollar mark. However, let's consider the chair's age, the quality of the craftsmanship, and its unique history. I'm personally attached to this chair. I can do $10.5, which will help me cover a small portion of its acquisition cost. How's that sound?\"\n\nTurn #6: Eli Dawson said: \"William, I am convinced that you value this chair as much as I do, and I respect its historical significance. I'm fully prepared to spend an extra half-dollar in respect for this piece's unique history. So, let's settle this at $10.5. Looking forward to cherishing this beautiful piece of history.\"\n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"Eli, I absolutely appreciate your understanding and respect for this chair's value and history. Let's close the deal at $10.5 then. I'm sure it will be an excellent addition to your collection. Thank you for your purchase!\"\n\nTurn #8: Eli Dawson said: \"Thank you, William. I am thrilled to add the chair to my collection, and I will ensure it's well preserved. Can we discuss the payment and delivery arrangements?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Eli! I'm glad to discuss that. Let's proceed with the payment via a secure method you prefer. As for delivery, we can arrange a pick up from my location, or I could deliver it to you for a small fee. Which would you prefer?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Antique Chair for $15.0, while another person is interested in purchasing it. Here's what you need to know about the item: it's a beautifully carved antique wooden chair. It's in good condition, but could probably benefit from a fresh seat cushion.\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and William Brown\nEli Dawson's background: \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nEli Dawson's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: You are the seller for this item and your target price is $8. You should be aware that if you sell it for a price significantly lower than the target price, you will incur a penalty. However, if you manage to sell it for more than the target price, you stand to receive a bonus.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Hello William, I'm interested in your antique chair. It\u2019s suits my love for history. Can you tell me a bit more about it? How old it is? Is it hand carved? Has it been refurbished before?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Hello Eli, delightful to hear that you're interested in the chair! This piece is roughly 70 years old and is indeed hand-carved. Over the years, it has been looked after well but not officially refurbished. As for the condition, as mentioned earlier, it could benefit from a fresh seat cushion. It's a wonderful piece of furniture if you ask me!\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"Thanks for the detailed description, William! The chair indeed sounds like a wonderful piece of history. However, considering it needs a new cushion, would you consider lowering the price? How about $9.0?\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"Eli, I see your point about the cushion and I value your interest in this chair. I really believe it's a beautiful piece and should go to someone who would truly appreciate it. Would you consider meeting me halfway at $11.5? I think it's a fair price and a small investment to preserve a piece of history.\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"William, you make a solid case about the value of this chair and preserving history. As a fellow history enthusiast, I can respect that. Would you consider coming down just a bit more, to $10? It's more symbolic than anything, reaching double digits for an item that holds such significance. Plus, it will cover part of the cost for the new cushion. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"Eli, I hear you loud and clear about the significance of reaching a ten-dollar mark. However, let's consider the chair's age, the quality of the craftsmanship, and its unique history. I'm personally attached to this chair. I can do $10.5, which will help me cover a small portion of its acquisition cost. How's that sound?\"\n\nTurn #6: Eli Dawson said: \"William, I am convinced that you value this chair as much as I do, and I respect its historical significance. I'm fully prepared to spend an extra half-dollar in respect for this piece's unique history. So, let's settle this at $10.5. Looking forward to cherishing this beautiful piece of history.\"\n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"Eli, I absolutely appreciate your understanding and respect for this chair's value and history. Let's close the deal at $10.5 then. I'm sure it will be an excellent addition to your collection. Thank you for your purchase!\"\n\nTurn #8: Eli Dawson said: \"Thank you, William. I am thrilled to add the chair to my collection, and I will ensure it's well preserved. Can we discuss the payment and delivery arrangements?\"\n\nTurn #9: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Eli! I'm glad to discuss that. Let's proceed with the payment via a secure method you prefer. As for delivery, we can arrange a pick up from my location, or I could deliver it to you for a small fee. Which would you prefer?\"\n\nTurn #10: Eli Dawson said: \"William, I appreciate your flexibility. I will opt for picking up the chair from your location to avoid any extra cost. As for payment, I prefer using PayPal, if that's acceptable to you? This way we ensure a secure transaction.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds perfect, Eli! I'm glad we are on the same page. I accept PayPal, so we can proceed with that. I'll message you privately with the necessary details for the pickup. Thank you again for the purchase, and I can't wait for this antique chair to have its new home!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Antique Chair for $15.0, while another person is interested in purchasing it. Here's what you need to know about the item: it's a beautifully carved antique wooden chair. It's in good condition, but could probably benefit from a fresh seat cushion.\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and William Brown\nEli Dawson's background: \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nEli Dawson's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: You are the seller for this item and your target price is $8. You should be aware that if you sell it for a price significantly lower than the target price, you will incur a penalty. However, if you manage to sell it for more than the target price, you stand to receive a bonus.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Hello William, I'm interested in your antique chair. It\u2019s suits my love for history. Can you tell me a bit more about it? How old it is? Is it hand carved? Has it been refurbished before?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Hello Eli, delightful to hear that you're interested in the chair! This piece is roughly 70 years old and is indeed hand-carved. Over the years, it has been looked after well but not officially refurbished. As for the condition, as mentioned earlier, it could benefit from a fresh seat cushion. It's a wonderful piece of furniture if you ask me!\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"Thanks for the detailed description, William! The chair indeed sounds like a wonderful piece of history. However, considering it needs a new cushion, would you consider lowering the price? How about $9.0?\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"Eli, I see your point about the cushion and I value your interest in this chair. I really believe it's a beautiful piece and should go to someone who would truly appreciate it. Would you consider meeting me halfway at $11.5? I think it's a fair price and a small investment to preserve a piece of history.\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"William, you make a solid case about the value of this chair and preserving history. As a fellow history enthusiast, I can respect that. Would you consider coming down just a bit more, to $10? It's more symbolic than anything, reaching double digits for an item that holds such significance. Plus, it will cover part of the cost for the new cushion. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"Eli, I hear you loud and clear about the significance of reaching a ten-dollar mark. However, let's consider the chair's age, the quality of the craftsmanship, and its unique history. I'm personally attached to this chair. I can do $10.5, which will help me cover a small portion of its acquisition cost. How's that sound?\"\n\nTurn #6: Eli Dawson said: \"William, I am convinced that you value this chair as much as I do, and I respect its historical significance. I'm fully prepared to spend an extra half-dollar in respect for this piece's unique history. So, let's settle this at $10.5. Looking forward to cherishing this beautiful piece of history.\"\n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"Eli, I absolutely appreciate your understanding and respect for this chair's value and history. Let's close the deal at $10.5 then. I'm sure it will be an excellent addition to your collection. Thank you for your purchase!\"\n\nTurn #8: Eli Dawson said: \"Thank you, William. I am thrilled to add the chair to my collection, and I will ensure it's well preserved. Can we discuss the payment and delivery arrangements?\"\n\nTurn #9: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Eli! I'm glad to discuss that. Let's proceed with the payment via a secure method you prefer. As for delivery, we can arrange a pick up from my location, or I could deliver it to you for a small fee. Which would you prefer?\"\n\nTurn #10: Eli Dawson said: \"William, I appreciate your flexibility. I will opt for picking up the chair from your location to avoid any extra cost. As for payment, I prefer using PayPal, if that's acceptable to you? This way we ensure a secure transaction.\"\n\nTurn #11: William Brown said: \"That sounds perfect, Eli! I'm glad we are on the same page. I accept PayPal, so we can proceed with that. I'll message you privately with the necessary details for the pickup. Thank you again for the purchase, and I can't wait for this antique chair to have its new home!\"\n\nTurn #12: Eli Dawson said: \"Excellent, William! Thank you for your cooperation. I look forward to receiving the details for the pickup. This chair will indeed find a good home. Appreciate your help!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nZane Bennett's background: \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nElizabeth: School: Eastern Nazarene College Time Preference: morning Major: Social Science Education Location Preference: outdoor \nEric: School: San Jose State University Time Preference: evening Major: Geological Engineering Location Preference: outdoor \nLeroy: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nThanh: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nMarva: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Bioengineering Location Preference: outdoor \nMichael: School: Williams College Time Preference: morning Major: Marine Biology Location Preference: outdoor \nVirginia: School: Williams College Time Preference: evening Major: Applied Mathematics Location Preference: outdoor \nDebra: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Psychology Location Preference: outdoor \nEugenia: School: Stephens College Time Preference: morning Major: Psychology Location Preference: outdoor \nRoberto: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: morning Major: Electrical Technology Location Preference: outdoor \nMark: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: morning Major: Sports, Recreation, & Leisure Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nGeorgene: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: evening Major: Bioengineering Location Preference: outdoor \n\nZane Bennett's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey there! I'm Giselle. Nice party, isn't it? By the way, do you happen to know any students from Williams College? Several of my friends went there.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nZane Bennett's background: \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nElizabeth: School: Eastern Nazarene College Time Preference: morning Major: Social Science Education Location Preference: outdoor \nEric: School: San Jose State University Time Preference: evening Major: Geological Engineering Location Preference: outdoor \nLeroy: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nThanh: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nMarva: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Bioengineering Location Preference: outdoor \nMichael: School: Williams College Time Preference: morning Major: Marine Biology Location Preference: outdoor \nVirginia: School: Williams College Time Preference: evening Major: Applied Mathematics Location Preference: outdoor \nDebra: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Psychology Location Preference: outdoor \nEugenia: School: Stephens College Time Preference: morning Major: Psychology Location Preference: outdoor \nRoberto: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: morning Major: Electrical Technology Location Preference: outdoor \nMark: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: morning Major: Sports, Recreation, & Leisure Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nGeorgene: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: evening Major: Bioengineering Location Preference: outdoor \n\nZane Bennett's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hey there! I'm Giselle. Nice party, isn't it? By the way, do you happen to know any students from Williams College? Several of my friends went there.\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Hi Giselle, nice to meet you, I'm Zane. It is indeed a great party. As a matter of fact, I do know a few folks from Williams College. Out of curiosity, were any of your friends majoring in Greek or Asian Languages? I am asking because I met people with those majors during my visits to the campus in the afternoons.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Actually, yes! I have two friends who majored in Greek. They prefer spending their afternoons at the campus, their names are Leroy and Thanh. do you know them by any chance?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nZane Bennett's background: \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nElizabeth: School: Eastern Nazarene College Time Preference: morning Major: Social Science Education Location Preference: outdoor \nEric: School: San Jose State University Time Preference: evening Major: Geological Engineering Location Preference: outdoor \nLeroy: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nThanh: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nMarva: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Bioengineering Location Preference: outdoor \nMichael: School: Williams College Time Preference: morning Major: Marine Biology Location Preference: outdoor \nVirginia: School: Williams College Time Preference: evening Major: Applied Mathematics Location Preference: outdoor \nDebra: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Psychology Location Preference: outdoor \nEugenia: School: Stephens College Time Preference: morning Major: Psychology Location Preference: outdoor \nRoberto: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: morning Major: Electrical Technology Location Preference: outdoor \nMark: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: morning Major: Sports, Recreation, & Leisure Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nGeorgene: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: evening Major: Bioengineering Location Preference: outdoor \n\nZane Bennett's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hey there! I'm Giselle. Nice party, isn't it? By the way, do you happen to know any students from Williams College? Several of my friends went there.\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Hi Giselle, nice to meet you, I'm Zane. It is indeed a great party. As a matter of fact, I do know a few folks from Williams College. Out of curiosity, were any of your friends majoring in Greek or Asian Languages? I am asking because I met people with those majors during my visits to the campus in the afternoons.\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Actually, yes! I have two friends who majored in Greek. They prefer spending their afternoons at the campus, their names are Leroy and Thanh. do you know them by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"Oh, Thanh! Yes, absolutely, I do know him. He and I have a mutual love for Greek mythology. I can't recall meeting Leroy though, maybe it was at a time when I wasn't around. By the way, With Williams College on the table, do you happen to know anyone majoring in Vocational Education or Materials Engineering? I have other friends, Vance and James, from there as well.\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Vance and James, you say? While I know a lot of bright students from Williams, I'm not sure if I know anyone majoring in Vocational Education or Materials Engineering. But it's great that your circle is so diverse. Did any of your friends happen to major in Bioengineering or Applied Mathematics? I have a couple of friends, Marva and Virginia, from Williams who took those subjects.\"\n\nTurn #5: Zane Bennett said: \"Oh, Applied Mathematics and Bioengineering? Surprisingly, I don't think I know anyone with those majors from Williams. Most of my friends there had more unique majors, like Greek or Vocational Education. It just goes to show how diverse the student body is, I guess. Does your friend circle extend to Trenton State College or Rutgers perhaps? I also know several people who studied there in various fields.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oh, certainly! I do have a friend who attended Trenton State College. His name's Leroy, majored in Greek. Maybe your path crossed with him at some point? As for Rutgers, I can't remember any of my friends going there.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nZane Bennett's background: \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nElizabeth: School: Eastern Nazarene College Time Preference: morning Major: Social Science Education Location Preference: outdoor \nEric: School: San Jose State University Time Preference: evening Major: Geological Engineering Location Preference: outdoor \nLeroy: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nThanh: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nMarva: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Bioengineering Location Preference: outdoor \nMichael: School: Williams College Time Preference: morning Major: Marine Biology Location Preference: outdoor \nVirginia: School: Williams College Time Preference: evening Major: Applied Mathematics Location Preference: outdoor \nDebra: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Psychology Location Preference: outdoor \nEugenia: School: Stephens College Time Preference: morning Major: Psychology Location Preference: outdoor \nRoberto: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: morning Major: Electrical Technology Location Preference: outdoor \nMark: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: morning Major: Sports, Recreation, & Leisure Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nGeorgene: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: evening Major: Bioengineering Location Preference: outdoor \n\nZane Bennett's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hey there! I'm Giselle. Nice party, isn't it? By the way, do you happen to know any students from Williams College? Several of my friends went there.\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Hi Giselle, nice to meet you, I'm Zane. It is indeed a great party. As a matter of fact, I do know a few folks from Williams College. Out of curiosity, were any of your friends majoring in Greek or Asian Languages? I am asking because I met people with those majors during my visits to the campus in the afternoons.\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Actually, yes! I have two friends who majored in Greek. They prefer spending their afternoons at the campus, their names are Leroy and Thanh. do you know them by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"Oh, Thanh! Yes, absolutely, I do know him. He and I have a mutual love for Greek mythology. I can't recall meeting Leroy though, maybe it was at a time when I wasn't around. By the way, With Williams College on the table, do you happen to know anyone majoring in Vocational Education or Materials Engineering? I have other friends, Vance and James, from there as well.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Vance and James, you say? While I know a lot of bright students from Williams, I'm not sure if I know anyone majoring in Vocational Education or Materials Engineering. But it's great that your circle is so diverse. Did any of your friends happen to major in Bioengineering or Applied Mathematics? I have a couple of friends, Marva and Virginia, from Williams who took those subjects.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nZane Bennett's background: \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nElizabeth: School: Eastern Nazarene College Time Preference: morning Major: Social Science Education Location Preference: outdoor \nEric: School: San Jose State University Time Preference: evening Major: Geological Engineering Location Preference: outdoor \nLeroy: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nThanh: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nMarva: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Bioengineering Location Preference: outdoor \nMichael: School: Williams College Time Preference: morning Major: Marine Biology Location Preference: outdoor \nVirginia: School: Williams College Time Preference: evening Major: Applied Mathematics Location Preference: outdoor \nDebra: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Psychology Location Preference: outdoor \nEugenia: School: Stephens College Time Preference: morning Major: Psychology Location Preference: outdoor \nRoberto: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: morning Major: Electrical Technology Location Preference: outdoor \nMark: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: morning Major: Sports, Recreation, & Leisure Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nGeorgene: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: evening Major: Bioengineering Location Preference: outdoor \n\nZane Bennett's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hey there! I'm Giselle. Nice party, isn't it? By the way, do you happen to know any students from Williams College? Several of my friends went there.\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Hi Giselle, nice to meet you, I'm Zane. It is indeed a great party. As a matter of fact, I do know a few folks from Williams College. Out of curiosity, were any of your friends majoring in Greek or Asian Languages? I am asking because I met people with those majors during my visits to the campus in the afternoons.\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Actually, yes! I have two friends who majored in Greek. They prefer spending their afternoons at the campus, their names are Leroy and Thanh. do you know them by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"Oh, Thanh! Yes, absolutely, I do know him. He and I have a mutual love for Greek mythology. I can't recall meeting Leroy though, maybe it was at a time when I wasn't around. By the way, With Williams College on the table, do you happen to know anyone majoring in Vocational Education or Materials Engineering? I have other friends, Vance and James, from there as well.\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Vance and James, you say? While I know a lot of bright students from Williams, I'm not sure if I know anyone majoring in Vocational Education or Materials Engineering. But it's great that your circle is so diverse. Did any of your friends happen to major in Bioengineering or Applied Mathematics? I have a couple of friends, Marva and Virginia, from Williams who took those subjects.\"\n\nTurn #5: Zane Bennett said: \"Oh, Applied Mathematics and Bioengineering? Surprisingly, I don't think I know anyone with those majors from Williams. Most of my friends there had more unique majors, like Greek or Vocational Education. It just goes to show how diverse the student body is, I guess. Does your friend circle extend to Trenton State College or Rutgers perhaps? I also know several people who studied there in various fields.\"\n\nTurn #6: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Oh, certainly! I do have a friend who attended Trenton State College. His name's Leroy, majored in Greek. Maybe your path crossed with him at some point? As for Rutgers, I can't remember any of my friends going there.\"\n\nTurn #7: Zane Bennett said: \"Leroy, with a Greek major from Trenton State College - that's surprising because I have a friend, Janet, who also studied Greek there, though she preferred her morning sessions. Perhaps their paths crossed at some point, the world is small after all! Additionally, while we're talking about colleges, any of your friends happen to be from Oberlin College as well?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"No, I don't believe I have any connections to Oberlin, though with an art major like mine you're always meeting people from all over, colleges included. It's funny, who knew Greek was such a popular major? It truly is a small world! Janet, was it? I'll have to ask Leroy if he's familiar with her. By the way, how about University of Arkansas - Fayetteville? I have a few friends, Mark, Georgene, and Roberto, who studied there. Does that ring a bell?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nZane Bennett's background: \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nElizabeth: School: Eastern Nazarene College Time Preference: morning Major: Social Science Education Location Preference: outdoor \nEric: School: San Jose State University Time Preference: evening Major: Geological Engineering Location Preference: outdoor \nLeroy: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nThanh: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nMarva: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Bioengineering Location Preference: outdoor \nMichael: School: Williams College Time Preference: morning Major: Marine Biology Location Preference: outdoor \nVirginia: School: Williams College Time Preference: evening Major: Applied Mathematics Location Preference: outdoor \nDebra: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Psychology Location Preference: outdoor \nEugenia: School: Stephens College Time Preference: morning Major: Psychology Location Preference: outdoor \nRoberto: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: morning Major: Electrical Technology Location Preference: outdoor \nMark: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: morning Major: Sports, Recreation, & Leisure Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nGeorgene: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: evening Major: Bioengineering Location Preference: outdoor \n\nZane Bennett's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hey there! I'm Giselle. Nice party, isn't it? By the way, do you happen to know any students from Williams College? Several of my friends went there.\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Hi Giselle, nice to meet you, I'm Zane. It is indeed a great party. As a matter of fact, I do know a few folks from Williams College. Out of curiosity, were any of your friends majoring in Greek or Asian Languages? I am asking because I met people with those majors during my visits to the campus in the afternoons.\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Actually, yes! I have two friends who majored in Greek. They prefer spending their afternoons at the campus, their names are Leroy and Thanh. do you know them by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"Oh, Thanh! Yes, absolutely, I do know him. He and I have a mutual love for Greek mythology. I can't recall meeting Leroy though, maybe it was at a time when I wasn't around. By the way, With Williams College on the table, do you happen to know anyone majoring in Vocational Education or Materials Engineering? I have other friends, Vance and James, from there as well.\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Vance and James, you say? While I know a lot of bright students from Williams, I'm not sure if I know anyone majoring in Vocational Education or Materials Engineering. But it's great that your circle is so diverse. Did any of your friends happen to major in Bioengineering or Applied Mathematics? I have a couple of friends, Marva and Virginia, from Williams who took those subjects.\"\n\nTurn #5: Zane Bennett said: \"Oh, Applied Mathematics and Bioengineering? Surprisingly, I don't think I know anyone with those majors from Williams. Most of my friends there had more unique majors, like Greek or Vocational Education. It just goes to show how diverse the student body is, I guess. Does your friend circle extend to Trenton State College or Rutgers perhaps? I also know several people who studied there in various fields.\"\n\nTurn #6: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Oh, certainly! I do have a friend who attended Trenton State College. His name's Leroy, majored in Greek. Maybe your path crossed with him at some point? As for Rutgers, I can't remember any of my friends going there.\"\n\nTurn #7: Zane Bennett said: \"Leroy, with a Greek major from Trenton State College - that's surprising because I have a friend, Janet, who also studied Greek there, though she preferred her morning sessions. Perhaps their paths crossed at some point, the world is small after all! Additionally, while we're talking about colleges, any of your friends happen to be from Oberlin College as well?\"\n\nTurn #8: Giselle Rousseau said: \"No, I don't believe I have any connections to Oberlin, though with an art major like mine you're always meeting people from all over, colleges included. It's funny, who knew Greek was such a popular major? It truly is a small world! Janet, was it? I'll have to ask Leroy if he's familiar with her. By the way, how about University of Arkansas - Fayetteville? I have a few friends, Mark, Georgene, and Roberto, who studied there. Does that ring a bell?\"\n\nTurn #9: Zane Bennett said: \"University of Arkansas - Fayetteville, hmm, I don't believe I've met anyone from there, at least not that I'm aware of. But as you said, it's intriguing how connected we all could be without realizing it. I certainly appreciate how enriched my life has become because of these connections. It was truly a delight speaking to you, Giselle.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"The pleasure was all mine, Zane. I've thoroughly enjoyed our little exploration of mutual connections. It just goes to show, the world can be a quite small place. Enjoy the rest of the party!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nZane Bennett's background: \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nElizabeth: School: Eastern Nazarene College Time Preference: morning Major: Social Science Education Location Preference: outdoor \nEric: School: San Jose State University Time Preference: evening Major: Geological Engineering Location Preference: outdoor \nLeroy: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nThanh: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nMarva: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Bioengineering Location Preference: outdoor \nMichael: School: Williams College Time Preference: morning Major: Marine Biology Location Preference: outdoor \nVirginia: School: Williams College Time Preference: evening Major: Applied Mathematics Location Preference: outdoor \nDebra: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Psychology Location Preference: outdoor \nEugenia: School: Stephens College Time Preference: morning Major: Psychology Location Preference: outdoor \nRoberto: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: morning Major: Electrical Technology Location Preference: outdoor \nMark: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: morning Major: Sports, Recreation, & Leisure Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nGeorgene: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: evening Major: Bioengineering Location Preference: outdoor \n\nZane Bennett's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hey there! I'm Giselle. Nice party, isn't it? By the way, do you happen to know any students from Williams College? Several of my friends went there.\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Hi Giselle, nice to meet you, I'm Zane. It is indeed a great party. As a matter of fact, I do know a few folks from Williams College. Out of curiosity, were any of your friends majoring in Greek or Asian Languages? I am asking because I met people with those majors during my visits to the campus in the afternoons.\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Actually, yes! I have two friends who majored in Greek. They prefer spending their afternoons at the campus, their names are Leroy and Thanh. do you know them by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"Oh, Thanh! Yes, absolutely, I do know him. He and I have a mutual love for Greek mythology. I can't recall meeting Leroy though, maybe it was at a time when I wasn't around. By the way, With Williams College on the table, do you happen to know anyone majoring in Vocational Education or Materials Engineering? I have other friends, Vance and James, from there as well.\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Vance and James, you say? While I know a lot of bright students from Williams, I'm not sure if I know anyone majoring in Vocational Education or Materials Engineering. But it's great that your circle is so diverse. Did any of your friends happen to major in Bioengineering or Applied Mathematics? I have a couple of friends, Marva and Virginia, from Williams who took those subjects.\"\n\nTurn #5: Zane Bennett said: \"Oh, Applied Mathematics and Bioengineering? Surprisingly, I don't think I know anyone with those majors from Williams. Most of my friends there had more unique majors, like Greek or Vocational Education. It just goes to show how diverse the student body is, I guess. Does your friend circle extend to Trenton State College or Rutgers perhaps? I also know several people who studied there in various fields.\"\n\nTurn #6: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Oh, certainly! I do have a friend who attended Trenton State College. His name's Leroy, majored in Greek. Maybe your path crossed with him at some point? As for Rutgers, I can't remember any of my friends going there.\"\n\nTurn #7: Zane Bennett said: \"Leroy, with a Greek major from Trenton State College - that's surprising because I have a friend, Janet, who also studied Greek there, though she preferred her morning sessions. Perhaps their paths crossed at some point, the world is small after all! Additionally, while we're talking about colleges, any of your friends happen to be from Oberlin College as well?\"\n\nTurn #8: Giselle Rousseau said: \"No, I don't believe I have any connections to Oberlin, though with an art major like mine you're always meeting people from all over, colleges included. It's funny, who knew Greek was such a popular major? It truly is a small world! Janet, was it? I'll have to ask Leroy if he's familiar with her. By the way, how about University of Arkansas - Fayetteville? I have a few friends, Mark, Georgene, and Roberto, who studied there. Does that ring a bell?\"\n\nTurn #9: Zane Bennett said: \"University of Arkansas - Fayetteville, hmm, I don't believe I've met anyone from there, at least not that I'm aware of. But as you said, it's intriguing how connected we all could be without realizing it. I certainly appreciate how enriched my life has become because of these connections. It was truly a delight speaking to you, Giselle.\"\n\nTurn #10: Giselle Rousseau said: \"The pleasure was all mine, Zane. I've thoroughly enjoyed our little exploration of mutual connections. It just goes to show, the world can be a quite small place. Enjoy the rest of the party!\"\n\nTurn #11: Zane Bennett left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Zane Bennett, your task is to act/speak as Zane Bennett would, keeping in mind Zane Bennett's social goal.\nYou can find Zane Bennett's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Zane Bennett's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Zane Bennett's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: \nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. Personality and values description: Zane Bennett is creative and outgoing, he values achievement and fairness. His decision-making is unique, often finding novel solutions to problems. Zane's secrets: He's secretly engaged to his best friend's ex.\nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Unknown\nZane Bennett's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nThanh: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nVance: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Vocational Education Location Preference: outdoor \nBrenda: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: evening Major: Conflict Resolution Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nAlice: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Crafts & Artisanry Location Preference: indoor \nThomas: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Asian Languages Location Preference: indoor \nJanet: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Greek Location Preference: indoor \nRobert: School: Rutgers University, Newark Time Preference: morning Major: Protestant Affiliation Location Preference: indoor \nAnthony: School: Oberlin College Time Preference: morning Major: Conflict Resolution Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nElvera: School: Muskingum College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Crafts & Artisanry Location Preference: outdoor \nJames: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Materials Engineering Location Preference: outdoor \nEdgar: School: Muskingum College Time Preference: morning Major: Conflict Resolution Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nKristen: School: Oberlin College Time Preference: evening Major: Electrical Technology Location Preference: indoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hey there! I'm Giselle. Nice party, isn't it? By the way, do you happen to know any students from Williams College? Several of my friends went there.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hi Giselle, nice to meet you, I'm Zane. It is indeed a great party. As a matter of fact, I do know a few folks from Williams College. Out of curiosity, were any of your friends majoring in Greek or Asian Languages? I am asking because I met people with those majors during my visits to the campus in the afternoons.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Zane Bennett, your task is to act/speak as Zane Bennett would, keeping in mind Zane Bennett's social goal.\nYou can find Zane Bennett's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Zane Bennett's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Zane Bennett's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: \nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. Personality and values description: Zane Bennett is creative and outgoing, he values achievement and fairness. His decision-making is unique, often finding novel solutions to problems. Zane's secrets: He's secretly engaged to his best friend's ex.\nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Unknown\nZane Bennett's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nThanh: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nVance: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Vocational Education Location Preference: outdoor \nBrenda: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: evening Major: Conflict Resolution Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nAlice: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Crafts & Artisanry Location Preference: indoor \nThomas: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Asian Languages Location Preference: indoor \nJanet: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Greek Location Preference: indoor \nRobert: School: Rutgers University, Newark Time Preference: morning Major: Protestant Affiliation Location Preference: indoor \nAnthony: School: Oberlin College Time Preference: morning Major: Conflict Resolution Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nElvera: School: Muskingum College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Crafts & Artisanry Location Preference: outdoor \nJames: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Materials Engineering Location Preference: outdoor \nEdgar: School: Muskingum College Time Preference: morning Major: Conflict Resolution Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nKristen: School: Oberlin College Time Preference: evening Major: Electrical Technology Location Preference: indoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hey there! I'm Giselle. Nice party, isn't it? By the way, do you happen to know any students from Williams College? Several of my friends went there.\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Hi Giselle, nice to meet you, I'm Zane. It is indeed a great party. As a matter of fact, I do know a few folks from Williams College. Out of curiosity, were any of your friends majoring in Greek or Asian Languages? I am asking because I met people with those majors during my visits to the campus in the afternoons.\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Actually, yes! I have two friends who majored in Greek. They prefer spending their afternoons at the campus, their names are Leroy and Thanh. do you know them by any chance?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oh, Thanh! Yes, absolutely, I do know him. He and I have a mutual love for Greek mythology. I can't recall meeting Leroy though, maybe it was at a time when I wasn't around. By the way, With Williams College on the table, do you happen to know anyone majoring in Vocational Education or Materials Engineering? I have other friends, Vance and James, from there as well.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Zane Bennett, your task is to act/speak as Zane Bennett would, keeping in mind Zane Bennett's social goal.\nYou can find Zane Bennett's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Zane Bennett's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Zane Bennett's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: \nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. Personality and values description: Zane Bennett is creative and outgoing, he values achievement and fairness. His decision-making is unique, often finding novel solutions to problems. Zane's secrets: He's secretly engaged to his best friend's ex.\nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Unknown\nZane Bennett's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nThanh: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nVance: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Vocational Education Location Preference: outdoor \nBrenda: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: evening Major: Conflict Resolution Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nAlice: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Crafts & Artisanry Location Preference: indoor \nThomas: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Asian Languages Location Preference: indoor \nJanet: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Greek Location Preference: indoor \nRobert: School: Rutgers University, Newark Time Preference: morning Major: Protestant Affiliation Location Preference: indoor \nAnthony: School: Oberlin College Time Preference: morning Major: Conflict Resolution Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nElvera: School: Muskingum College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Crafts & Artisanry Location Preference: outdoor \nJames: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Materials Engineering Location Preference: outdoor \nEdgar: School: Muskingum College Time Preference: morning Major: Conflict Resolution Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nKristen: School: Oberlin College Time Preference: evening Major: Electrical Technology Location Preference: indoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hey there! I'm Giselle. Nice party, isn't it? By the way, do you happen to know any students from Williams College? Several of my friends went there.\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Hi Giselle, nice to meet you, I'm Zane. It is indeed a great party. As a matter of fact, I do know a few folks from Williams College. Out of curiosity, were any of your friends majoring in Greek or Asian Languages? I am asking because I met people with those majors during my visits to the campus in the afternoons.\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Actually, yes! I have two friends who majored in Greek. They prefer spending their afternoons at the campus, their names are Leroy and Thanh. do you know them by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"Oh, Thanh! Yes, absolutely, I do know him. He and I have a mutual love for Greek mythology. I can't recall meeting Leroy though, maybe it was at a time when I wasn't around. By the way, With Williams College on the table, do you happen to know anyone majoring in Vocational Education or Materials Engineering? I have other friends, Vance and James, from there as well.\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Vance and James, you say? While I know a lot of bright students from Williams, I'm not sure if I know anyone majoring in Vocational Education or Materials Engineering. But it's great that your circle is so diverse. Did any of your friends happen to major in Bioengineering or Applied Mathematics? I have a couple of friends, Marva and Virginia, from Williams who took those subjects.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oh, Applied Mathematics and Bioengineering? Surprisingly, I don't think I know anyone with those majors from Williams. Most of my friends there had more unique majors, like Greek or Vocational Education. It just goes to show how diverse the student body is, I guess. Does your friend circle extend to Trenton State College or Rutgers perhaps? I also know several people who studied there in various fields.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Zane Bennett, your task is to act/speak as Zane Bennett would, keeping in mind Zane Bennett's social goal.\nYou can find Zane Bennett's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Zane Bennett's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Zane Bennett's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: \nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. Personality and values description: Zane Bennett is creative and outgoing, he values achievement and fairness. His decision-making is unique, often finding novel solutions to problems. Zane's secrets: He's secretly engaged to his best friend's ex.\nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Unknown\nZane Bennett's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nThanh: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nVance: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Vocational Education Location Preference: outdoor \nBrenda: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: evening Major: Conflict Resolution Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nAlice: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Crafts & Artisanry Location Preference: indoor \nThomas: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Asian Languages Location Preference: indoor \nJanet: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Greek Location Preference: indoor \nRobert: School: Rutgers University, Newark Time Preference: morning Major: Protestant Affiliation Location Preference: indoor \nAnthony: School: Oberlin College Time Preference: morning Major: Conflict Resolution Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nElvera: School: Muskingum College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Crafts & Artisanry Location Preference: outdoor \nJames: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Materials Engineering Location Preference: outdoor \nEdgar: School: Muskingum College Time Preference: morning Major: Conflict Resolution Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nKristen: School: Oberlin College Time Preference: evening Major: Electrical Technology Location Preference: indoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hey there! I'm Giselle. Nice party, isn't it? By the way, do you happen to know any students from Williams College? Several of my friends went there.\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Hi Giselle, nice to meet you, I'm Zane. It is indeed a great party. As a matter of fact, I do know a few folks from Williams College. Out of curiosity, were any of your friends majoring in Greek or Asian Languages? I am asking because I met people with those majors during my visits to the campus in the afternoons.\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Actually, yes! I have two friends who majored in Greek. They prefer spending their afternoons at the campus, their names are Leroy and Thanh. do you know them by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"Oh, Thanh! Yes, absolutely, I do know him. He and I have a mutual love for Greek mythology. I can't recall meeting Leroy though, maybe it was at a time when I wasn't around. By the way, With Williams College on the table, do you happen to know anyone majoring in Vocational Education or Materials Engineering? I have other friends, Vance and James, from there as well.\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Vance and James, you say? While I know a lot of bright students from Williams, I'm not sure if I know anyone majoring in Vocational Education or Materials Engineering. But it's great that your circle is so diverse. Did any of your friends happen to major in Bioengineering or Applied Mathematics? I have a couple of friends, Marva and Virginia, from Williams who took those subjects.\"\n\nTurn #5: Zane Bennett said: \"Oh, Applied Mathematics and Bioengineering? Surprisingly, I don't think I know anyone with those majors from Williams. Most of my friends there had more unique majors, like Greek or Vocational Education. It just goes to show how diverse the student body is, I guess. Does your friend circle extend to Trenton State College or Rutgers perhaps? I also know several people who studied there in various fields.\"\n\nTurn #6: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Oh, certainly! I do have a friend who attended Trenton State College. His name's Leroy, majored in Greek. Maybe your path crossed with him at some point? As for Rutgers, I can't remember any of my friends going there.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Leroy, with a Greek major from Trenton State College - that's surprising because I have a friend, Janet, who also studied Greek there, though she preferred her morning sessions. Perhaps their paths crossed at some point, the world is small after all! Additionally, while we're talking about colleges, any of your friends happen to be from Oberlin College as well?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Zane Bennett, your task is to act/speak as Zane Bennett would, keeping in mind Zane Bennett's social goal.\nYou can find Zane Bennett's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Zane Bennett's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Zane Bennett's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: \nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. Personality and values description: Zane Bennett is creative and outgoing, he values achievement and fairness. His decision-making is unique, often finding novel solutions to problems. Zane's secrets: He's secretly engaged to his best friend's ex.\nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Unknown\nZane Bennett's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nThanh: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nVance: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Vocational Education Location Preference: outdoor \nBrenda: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: evening Major: Conflict Resolution Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nAlice: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Crafts & Artisanry Location Preference: indoor \nThomas: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Asian Languages Location Preference: indoor \nJanet: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Greek Location Preference: indoor \nRobert: School: Rutgers University, Newark Time Preference: morning Major: Protestant Affiliation Location Preference: indoor \nAnthony: School: Oberlin College Time Preference: morning Major: Conflict Resolution Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nElvera: School: Muskingum College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Crafts & Artisanry Location Preference: outdoor \nJames: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Materials Engineering Location Preference: outdoor \nEdgar: School: Muskingum College Time Preference: morning Major: Conflict Resolution Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nKristen: School: Oberlin College Time Preference: evening Major: Electrical Technology Location Preference: indoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hey there! I'm Giselle. Nice party, isn't it? By the way, do you happen to know any students from Williams College? Several of my friends went there.\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Hi Giselle, nice to meet you, I'm Zane. It is indeed a great party. As a matter of fact, I do know a few folks from Williams College. Out of curiosity, were any of your friends majoring in Greek or Asian Languages? I am asking because I met people with those majors during my visits to the campus in the afternoons.\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Actually, yes! I have two friends who majored in Greek. They prefer spending their afternoons at the campus, their names are Leroy and Thanh. do you know them by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"Oh, Thanh! Yes, absolutely, I do know him. He and I have a mutual love for Greek mythology. I can't recall meeting Leroy though, maybe it was at a time when I wasn't around. By the way, With Williams College on the table, do you happen to know anyone majoring in Vocational Education or Materials Engineering? I have other friends, Vance and James, from there as well.\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Vance and James, you say? While I know a lot of bright students from Williams, I'm not sure if I know anyone majoring in Vocational Education or Materials Engineering. But it's great that your circle is so diverse. Did any of your friends happen to major in Bioengineering or Applied Mathematics? I have a couple of friends, Marva and Virginia, from Williams who took those subjects.\"\n\nTurn #5: Zane Bennett said: \"Oh, Applied Mathematics and Bioengineering? Surprisingly, I don't think I know anyone with those majors from Williams. Most of my friends there had more unique majors, like Greek or Vocational Education. It just goes to show how diverse the student body is, I guess. Does your friend circle extend to Trenton State College or Rutgers perhaps? I also know several people who studied there in various fields.\"\n\nTurn #6: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Oh, certainly! I do have a friend who attended Trenton State College. His name's Leroy, majored in Greek. Maybe your path crossed with him at some point? As for Rutgers, I can't remember any of my friends going there.\"\n\nTurn #7: Zane Bennett said: \"Leroy, with a Greek major from Trenton State College - that's surprising because I have a friend, Janet, who also studied Greek there, though she preferred her morning sessions. Perhaps their paths crossed at some point, the world is small after all! Additionally, while we're talking about colleges, any of your friends happen to be from Oberlin College as well?\"\n\nTurn #8: Giselle Rousseau said: \"No, I don't believe I have any connections to Oberlin, though with an art major like mine you're always meeting people from all over, colleges included. It's funny, who knew Greek was such a popular major? It truly is a small world! Janet, was it? I'll have to ask Leroy if he's familiar with her. By the way, how about University of Arkansas - Fayetteville? I have a few friends, Mark, Georgene, and Roberto, who studied there. Does that ring a bell?\"\n\nTurn #9: Zane Bennett said: \"University of Arkansas - Fayetteville, hmm, I don't believe I've met anyone from there, at least not that I'm aware of. But as you said, it's intriguing how connected we all could be without realizing it. I certainly appreciate how enriched my life has become because of these connections. It was truly a delight speaking to you, Giselle.\"\n\nTurn #10: Giselle Rousseau said: \"The pleasure was all mine, Zane. I've thoroughly enjoyed our little exploration of mutual connections. It just goes to show, the world can be a quite small place. Enjoy the rest of the party!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Zane Bennett, your task is to act/speak as Zane Bennett would, keeping in mind Zane Bennett's social goal.\nYou can find Zane Bennett's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Zane Bennett's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Zane Bennett's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: \nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. Personality and values description: Zane Bennett is creative and outgoing, he values achievement and fairness. His decision-making is unique, often finding novel solutions to problems. Zane's secrets: He's secretly engaged to his best friend's ex.\nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Unknown\nZane Bennett's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nThanh: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nVance: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Vocational Education Location Preference: outdoor \nBrenda: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: evening Major: Conflict Resolution Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nAlice: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Crafts & Artisanry Location Preference: indoor \nThomas: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Asian Languages Location Preference: indoor \nJanet: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Greek Location Preference: indoor \nRobert: School: Rutgers University, Newark Time Preference: morning Major: Protestant Affiliation Location Preference: indoor \nAnthony: School: Oberlin College Time Preference: morning Major: Conflict Resolution Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nElvera: School: Muskingum College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Crafts & Artisanry Location Preference: outdoor \nJames: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Materials Engineering Location Preference: outdoor \nEdgar: School: Muskingum College Time Preference: morning Major: Conflict Resolution Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nKristen: School: Oberlin College Time Preference: evening Major: Electrical Technology Location Preference: indoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hey there! I'm Giselle. Nice party, isn't it? By the way, do you happen to know any students from Williams College? Several of my friends went there.\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Hi Giselle, nice to meet you, I'm Zane. It is indeed a great party. As a matter of fact, I do know a few folks from Williams College. Out of curiosity, were any of your friends majoring in Greek or Asian Languages? I am asking because I met people with those majors during my visits to the campus in the afternoons.\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Actually, yes! I have two friends who majored in Greek. They prefer spending their afternoons at the campus, their names are Leroy and Thanh. do you know them by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"Oh, Thanh! Yes, absolutely, I do know him. He and I have a mutual love for Greek mythology. I can't recall meeting Leroy though, maybe it was at a time when I wasn't around. By the way, With Williams College on the table, do you happen to know anyone majoring in Vocational Education or Materials Engineering? I have other friends, Vance and James, from there as well.\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Vance and James, you say? While I know a lot of bright students from Williams, I'm not sure if I know anyone majoring in Vocational Education or Materials Engineering. But it's great that your circle is so diverse. Did any of your friends happen to major in Bioengineering or Applied Mathematics? I have a couple of friends, Marva and Virginia, from Williams who took those subjects.\"\n\nTurn #5: Zane Bennett said: \"Oh, Applied Mathematics and Bioengineering? Surprisingly, I don't think I know anyone with those majors from Williams. Most of my friends there had more unique majors, like Greek or Vocational Education. It just goes to show how diverse the student body is, I guess. Does your friend circle extend to Trenton State College or Rutgers perhaps? I also know several people who studied there in various fields.\"\n\nTurn #6: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Oh, certainly! I do have a friend who attended Trenton State College. His name's Leroy, majored in Greek. Maybe your path crossed with him at some point? As for Rutgers, I can't remember any of my friends going there.\"\n\nTurn #7: Zane Bennett said: \"Leroy, with a Greek major from Trenton State College - that's surprising because I have a friend, Janet, who also studied Greek there, though she preferred her morning sessions. Perhaps their paths crossed at some point, the world is small after all! Additionally, while we're talking about colleges, any of your friends happen to be from Oberlin College as well?\"\n\nTurn #8: Giselle Rousseau said: \"No, I don't believe I have any connections to Oberlin, though with an art major like mine you're always meeting people from all over, colleges included. It's funny, who knew Greek was such a popular major? It truly is a small world! Janet, was it? I'll have to ask Leroy if he's familiar with her. By the way, how about University of Arkansas - Fayetteville? I have a few friends, Mark, Georgene, and Roberto, who studied there. Does that ring a bell?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"University of Arkansas - Fayetteville, hmm, I don't believe I've met anyone from there, at least not that I'm aware of. But as you said, it's intriguing how connected we all could be without realizing it. I certainly appreciate how enriched my life has become because of these connections. It was truly a delight speaking to you, Giselle.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Eli Dawson, your task is to act/speak as Eli Dawson would, keeping in mind Eli Dawson's social goal.\nYou can find Eli Dawson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Eli Dawson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Eli Dawson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Eli Dawson and William Brown\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. Eli's secrets: He secretly funds a college student\nWilliam Brown's background: \nEli Dawson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDavid: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Christian Moerlein Brewing Company Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nLarry: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nLynn: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Cray Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nDonald: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Advance Auto Parts Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nDennis: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nJane: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Planet Hollywood Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nHarvey: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: Sony Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nNinfa: Hobby: Quilting Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nAngelica: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Planet Hollywood Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \n\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Good evening, William! I'm Eli. Fancy a chat? I noticed some fascinating mix of people around. By chance, do you happen to enjoy the craft of homebrewing?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Eli Dawson, your task is to act/speak as Eli Dawson would, keeping in mind Eli Dawson's social goal.\nYou can find Eli Dawson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Eli Dawson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Eli Dawson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Eli Dawson and William Brown\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. Eli's secrets: He secretly funds a college student\nWilliam Brown's background: \nEli Dawson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDavid: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Christian Moerlein Brewing Company Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nLarry: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nLynn: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Cray Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nDonald: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Advance Auto Parts Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nDennis: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nJane: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Planet Hollywood Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nHarvey: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: Sony Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nNinfa: Hobby: Quilting Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nAngelica: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Planet Hollywood Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \n\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Good evening, William! I'm Eli. Fancy a chat? I noticed some fascinating mix of people around. By chance, do you happen to enjoy the craft of homebrewing?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Good evening, Eli! I do appreciate a good homebrew every now and then, but my real passion lies in cooking, especially exploring new recipes. Speaking of hobbies, I have a friend who's completely taken up by acting. She spends her afternoons outdoor, often rehearsing her lines. Do you know of anyone with a hobby like that?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ah, acting, a challenging hobby for sure. Most of my friends prefer a completely different kind of performance, creating delicious homebrews. But I do know a person who loves the great outdoors in the mornings. Quite the contrast with your friend who prefers the afternoons. Are your friend's name happen to start with an N or a D?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Eli Dawson, your task is to act/speak as Eli Dawson would, keeping in mind Eli Dawson's social goal.\nYou can find Eli Dawson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Eli Dawson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Eli Dawson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Eli Dawson and William Brown\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. Eli's secrets: He secretly funds a college student\nWilliam Brown's background: \nEli Dawson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDavid: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Christian Moerlein Brewing Company Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nLarry: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nLynn: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Cray Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nDonald: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Advance Auto Parts Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nDennis: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nJane: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Planet Hollywood Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nHarvey: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: Sony Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nNinfa: Hobby: Quilting Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nAngelica: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Planet Hollywood Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \n\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Good evening, William! I'm Eli. Fancy a chat? I noticed some fascinating mix of people around. By chance, do you happen to enjoy the craft of homebrewing?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Good evening, Eli! I do appreciate a good homebrew every now and then, but my real passion lies in cooking, especially exploring new recipes. Speaking of hobbies, I have a friend who's completely taken up by acting. She spends her afternoons outdoor, often rehearsing her lines. Do you know of anyone with a hobby like that?\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"Ah, acting, a challenging hobby for sure. Most of my friends prefer a completely different kind of performance, creating delicious homebrews. But I do know a person who loves the great outdoors in the mornings. Quite the contrast with your friend who prefers the afternoons. Are your friend's name happen to start with an N or a D?\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"Interesting! I do know a couple of friends whose names start with 'N' and 'D'. Nancy is a keen dancer, she enjoys the Southern New England vibe while dancing outdoors in the afternoon. Dallas, on the other hand, shares the same passion for dancing, prefers the evenings, absorbing the calmness under the stars. Their energy and rhythm are addictive, to say the least!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ah, dancing under the stars sounds magical! I have a couple of friends who'd surely enjoy such a vibrant atmosphere, but they're more into creating their own rhythm through homebrewing and amateur radio than dancing. And when it comes to afternoons, my pal Donald is more likely to be found outside creating some craft beer than swaying to the rhythm. He works at Advance Auto Parts. Does that ring a bell?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Eli Dawson, your task is to act/speak as Eli Dawson would, keeping in mind Eli Dawson's social goal.\nYou can find Eli Dawson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Eli Dawson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Eli Dawson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Eli Dawson and William Brown\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. Eli's secrets: He secretly funds a college student\nWilliam Brown's background: \nEli Dawson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDavid: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Christian Moerlein Brewing Company Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nLarry: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nLynn: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Cray Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nDonald: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Advance Auto Parts Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nDennis: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nJane: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Planet Hollywood Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nHarvey: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: Sony Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nNinfa: Hobby: Quilting Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nAngelica: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Planet Hollywood Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \n\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Good evening, William! I'm Eli. Fancy a chat? I noticed some fascinating mix of people around. By chance, do you happen to enjoy the craft of homebrewing?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Good evening, Eli! I do appreciate a good homebrew every now and then, but my real passion lies in cooking, especially exploring new recipes. Speaking of hobbies, I have a friend who's completely taken up by acting. She spends her afternoons outdoor, often rehearsing her lines. Do you know of anyone with a hobby like that?\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"Ah, acting, a challenging hobby for sure. Most of my friends prefer a completely different kind of performance, creating delicious homebrews. But I do know a person who loves the great outdoors in the mornings. Quite the contrast with your friend who prefers the afternoons. Are your friend's name happen to start with an N or a D?\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"Interesting! I do know a couple of friends whose names start with 'N' and 'D'. Nancy is a keen dancer, she enjoys the Southern New England vibe while dancing outdoors in the afternoon. Dallas, on the other hand, shares the same passion for dancing, prefers the evenings, absorbing the calmness under the stars. Their energy and rhythm are addictive, to say the least!\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"Ah, dancing under the stars sounds magical! I have a couple of friends who'd surely enjoy such a vibrant atmosphere, but they're more into creating their own rhythm through homebrewing and amateur radio than dancing. And when it comes to afternoons, my pal Donald is more likely to be found outside creating some craft beer than swaying to the rhythm. He works at Advance Auto Parts. Does that ring a bell?\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"I can't say I know anyone from Advance Auto Parts. Most of my friends work in quite diverse companies, from Gentiva Health Services to Sony. I have a buddy, Harvey, who enjoys amateur radio, utilizes his afternoons indoor tuning into different stations. He works at Sony, quite adept at fixing stuff around. Likewise, another friend Lawrence, though he's more into outdoor activities like kayaking during the evenings. Has any of these sparked recognition?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Your friend Harvey at Sony does sound familiar, as one of my friends has quite a similar interest. Now that you've mentioned kayaking, it made me recall a friend of mine who is also drawn to outdoor activities. However, he's more into homebrewing than kayaking. He finds great tranquility being outdoors in the morning. Do either of your friends Larry or Dennis work at The J.M. Smucker Company, by any chance?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Eli Dawson, your task is to act/speak as Eli Dawson would, keeping in mind Eli Dawson's social goal.\nYou can find Eli Dawson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Eli Dawson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Eli Dawson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Eli Dawson and William Brown\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. Eli's secrets: He secretly funds a college student\nWilliam Brown's background: \nEli Dawson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDavid: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Christian Moerlein Brewing Company Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nLarry: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nLynn: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Cray Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nDonald: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Advance Auto Parts Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nDennis: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nJane: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Planet Hollywood Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nHarvey: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: Sony Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nNinfa: Hobby: Quilting Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nAngelica: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Planet Hollywood Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \n\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Good evening, William! I'm Eli. Fancy a chat? I noticed some fascinating mix of people around. By chance, do you happen to enjoy the craft of homebrewing?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Good evening, Eli! I do appreciate a good homebrew every now and then, but my real passion lies in cooking, especially exploring new recipes. Speaking of hobbies, I have a friend who's completely taken up by acting. She spends her afternoons outdoor, often rehearsing her lines. Do you know of anyone with a hobby like that?\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"Ah, acting, a challenging hobby for sure. Most of my friends prefer a completely different kind of performance, creating delicious homebrews. But I do know a person who loves the great outdoors in the mornings. Quite the contrast with your friend who prefers the afternoons. Are your friend's name happen to start with an N or a D?\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"Interesting! I do know a couple of friends whose names start with 'N' and 'D'. Nancy is a keen dancer, she enjoys the Southern New England vibe while dancing outdoors in the afternoon. Dallas, on the other hand, shares the same passion for dancing, prefers the evenings, absorbing the calmness under the stars. Their energy and rhythm are addictive, to say the least!\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"Ah, dancing under the stars sounds magical! I have a couple of friends who'd surely enjoy such a vibrant atmosphere, but they're more into creating their own rhythm through homebrewing and amateur radio than dancing. And when it comes to afternoons, my pal Donald is more likely to be found outside creating some craft beer than swaying to the rhythm. He works at Advance Auto Parts. Does that ring a bell?\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"I can't say I know anyone from Advance Auto Parts. Most of my friends work in quite diverse companies, from Gentiva Health Services to Sony. I have a buddy, Harvey, who enjoys amateur radio, utilizes his afternoons indoor tuning into different stations. He works at Sony, quite adept at fixing stuff around. Likewise, another friend Lawrence, though he's more into outdoor activities like kayaking during the evenings. Has any of these sparked recognition?\"\n\nTurn #6: Eli Dawson said: \"Your friend Harvey at Sony does sound familiar, as one of my friends has quite a similar interest. Now that you've mentioned kayaking, it made me recall a friend of mine who is also drawn to outdoor activities. However, he's more into homebrewing than kayaking. He finds great tranquility being outdoors in the morning. Do either of your friends Larry or Dennis work at The J.M. Smucker Company, by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"It appears we might just circulate the same sphere, Eli! I have a friend Blake who enjoys dancing outdoors during the evening. He works at The J.M. Smucker Company. Much like your friends, he's very much into creating rhythm, albeit through dancing rather than homebrewing. Knowing him, he might just take up the hobby! Does the name 'Blake' ring a bell?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"The name 'Blake' doesn't immediately ring a bell, but you never know. The world can feel like quite the small place sometimes, especially when you happen upon shared acquaintances. Much like your friend Blake, a friend of mine at The J.M. Smucker Company, Ninfa, absolutely savors the morning outdoor activities. Who knows, perhaps our paths have crossed more than we realized.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Eli Dawson, your task is to act/speak as Eli Dawson would, keeping in mind Eli Dawson's social goal.\nYou can find Eli Dawson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Eli Dawson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Eli Dawson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Eli Dawson and William Brown\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. Eli's secrets: He secretly funds a college student\nWilliam Brown's background: \nEli Dawson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDavid: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Christian Moerlein Brewing Company Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nLarry: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nLynn: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Cray Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nDonald: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Advance Auto Parts Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nDennis: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nJane: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Planet Hollywood Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nHarvey: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: Sony Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nNinfa: Hobby: Quilting Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nAngelica: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Planet Hollywood Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \n\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Good evening, William! I'm Eli. Fancy a chat? I noticed some fascinating mix of people around. By chance, do you happen to enjoy the craft of homebrewing?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Good evening, Eli! I do appreciate a good homebrew every now and then, but my real passion lies in cooking, especially exploring new recipes. Speaking of hobbies, I have a friend who's completely taken up by acting. She spends her afternoons outdoor, often rehearsing her lines. Do you know of anyone with a hobby like that?\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"Ah, acting, a challenging hobby for sure. Most of my friends prefer a completely different kind of performance, creating delicious homebrews. But I do know a person who loves the great outdoors in the mornings. Quite the contrast with your friend who prefers the afternoons. Are your friend's name happen to start with an N or a D?\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"Interesting! I do know a couple of friends whose names start with 'N' and 'D'. Nancy is a keen dancer, she enjoys the Southern New England vibe while dancing outdoors in the afternoon. Dallas, on the other hand, shares the same passion for dancing, prefers the evenings, absorbing the calmness under the stars. Their energy and rhythm are addictive, to say the least!\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"Ah, dancing under the stars sounds magical! I have a couple of friends who'd surely enjoy such a vibrant atmosphere, but they're more into creating their own rhythm through homebrewing and amateur radio than dancing. And when it comes to afternoons, my pal Donald is more likely to be found outside creating some craft beer than swaying to the rhythm. He works at Advance Auto Parts. Does that ring a bell?\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"I can't say I know anyone from Advance Auto Parts. Most of my friends work in quite diverse companies, from Gentiva Health Services to Sony. I have a buddy, Harvey, who enjoys amateur radio, utilizes his afternoons indoor tuning into different stations. He works at Sony, quite adept at fixing stuff around. Likewise, another friend Lawrence, though he's more into outdoor activities like kayaking during the evenings. Has any of these sparked recognition?\"\n\nTurn #6: Eli Dawson said: \"Your friend Harvey at Sony does sound familiar, as one of my friends has quite a similar interest. Now that you've mentioned kayaking, it made me recall a friend of mine who is also drawn to outdoor activities. However, he's more into homebrewing than kayaking. He finds great tranquility being outdoors in the morning. Do either of your friends Larry or Dennis work at The J.M. Smucker Company, by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"It appears we might just circulate the same sphere, Eli! I have a friend Blake who enjoys dancing outdoors during the evening. He works at The J.M. Smucker Company. Much like your friends, he's very much into creating rhythm, albeit through dancing rather than homebrewing. Knowing him, he might just take up the hobby! Does the name 'Blake' ring a bell?\"\n\nTurn #8: Eli Dawson said: \"The name 'Blake' doesn't immediately ring a bell, but you never know. The world can feel like quite the small place sometimes, especially when you happen upon shared acquaintances. Much like your friend Blake, a friend of mine at The J.M. Smucker Company, Ninfa, absolutely savors the morning outdoor activities. Who knows, perhaps our paths have crossed more than we realized.\"\n\nTurn #9: William Brown said: \"Indeed Eli, it's quite fascinating how interconnected our circle might be. Speaking of mornings, I have a friend, Marie, who loves spending her afternoons acting outdoors. She works at Southern New England Telephone. And it's quite possible, given the shared interests, that our friends might know each other. Perhaps across some outdoor gathering or a company event.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ah, an afternoon outdoor actor at Southern New England Telephone. It's quite splendid how hobbies link different people. You know, I have a bunch of friends who also enjoy spending their time outdoors, creating homebrews or tuning into different radio channels. Perhaps one day our circles might indeed intersect at an event, William. Till then, let's hope for some interesting coincidences. Anyway, does the name 'David' mean anything to you? He works at Christian Moerlein Brewing Company and usually spends his afternoons indoors.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Eli Dawson, your task is to act/speak as Eli Dawson would, keeping in mind Eli Dawson's social goal.\nYou can find Eli Dawson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Eli Dawson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Eli Dawson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Eli Dawson and William Brown\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. Eli's secrets: He secretly funds a college student\nWilliam Brown's background: \nEli Dawson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDavid: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Christian Moerlein Brewing Company Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nLarry: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nLynn: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Cray Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nDonald: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Advance Auto Parts Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nDennis: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nJane: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Planet Hollywood Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nHarvey: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: Sony Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nNinfa: Hobby: Quilting Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nAngelica: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Planet Hollywood Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \n\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Good evening, William! I'm Eli. Fancy a chat? I noticed some fascinating mix of people around. By chance, do you happen to enjoy the craft of homebrewing?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Good evening, Eli! I do appreciate a good homebrew every now and then, but my real passion lies in cooking, especially exploring new recipes. Speaking of hobbies, I have a friend who's completely taken up by acting. She spends her afternoons outdoor, often rehearsing her lines. Do you know of anyone with a hobby like that?\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"Ah, acting, a challenging hobby for sure. Most of my friends prefer a completely different kind of performance, creating delicious homebrews. But I do know a person who loves the great outdoors in the mornings. Quite the contrast with your friend who prefers the afternoons. Are your friend's name happen to start with an N or a D?\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"Interesting! I do know a couple of friends whose names start with 'N' and 'D'. Nancy is a keen dancer, she enjoys the Southern New England vibe while dancing outdoors in the afternoon. Dallas, on the other hand, shares the same passion for dancing, prefers the evenings, absorbing the calmness under the stars. Their energy and rhythm are addictive, to say the least!\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"Ah, dancing under the stars sounds magical! I have a couple of friends who'd surely enjoy such a vibrant atmosphere, but they're more into creating their own rhythm through homebrewing and amateur radio than dancing. And when it comes to afternoons, my pal Donald is more likely to be found outside creating some craft beer than swaying to the rhythm. He works at Advance Auto Parts. Does that ring a bell?\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"I can't say I know anyone from Advance Auto Parts. Most of my friends work in quite diverse companies, from Gentiva Health Services to Sony. I have a buddy, Harvey, who enjoys amateur radio, utilizes his afternoons indoor tuning into different stations. He works at Sony, quite adept at fixing stuff around. Likewise, another friend Lawrence, though he's more into outdoor activities like kayaking during the evenings. Has any of these sparked recognition?\"\n\nTurn #6: Eli Dawson said: \"Your friend Harvey at Sony does sound familiar, as one of my friends has quite a similar interest. Now that you've mentioned kayaking, it made me recall a friend of mine who is also drawn to outdoor activities. However, he's more into homebrewing than kayaking. He finds great tranquility being outdoors in the morning. Do either of your friends Larry or Dennis work at The J.M. Smucker Company, by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"It appears we might just circulate the same sphere, Eli! I have a friend Blake who enjoys dancing outdoors during the evening. He works at The J.M. Smucker Company. Much like your friends, he's very much into creating rhythm, albeit through dancing rather than homebrewing. Knowing him, he might just take up the hobby! Does the name 'Blake' ring a bell?\"\n\nTurn #8: Eli Dawson said: \"The name 'Blake' doesn't immediately ring a bell, but you never know. The world can feel like quite the small place sometimes, especially when you happen upon shared acquaintances. Much like your friend Blake, a friend of mine at The J.M. Smucker Company, Ninfa, absolutely savors the morning outdoor activities. Who knows, perhaps our paths have crossed more than we realized.\"\n\nTurn #9: William Brown said: \"Indeed Eli, it's quite fascinating how interconnected our circle might be. Speaking of mornings, I have a friend, Marie, who loves spending her afternoons acting outdoors. She works at Southern New England Telephone. And it's quite possible, given the shared interests, that our friends might know each other. Perhaps across some outdoor gathering or a company event.\"\n\nTurn #10: Eli Dawson said: \"Ah, an afternoon outdoor actor at Southern New England Telephone. It's quite splendid how hobbies link different people. You know, I have a bunch of friends who also enjoy spending their time outdoors, creating homebrews or tuning into different radio channels. Perhaps one day our circles might indeed intersect at an event, William. Till then, let's hope for some interesting coincidences. Anyway, does the name 'David' mean anything to you? He works at Christian Moerlein Brewing Company and usually spends his afternoons indoors.\"\n\nTurn #11: William Brown said: \"Christian Moerlein Brewing Company doesn't sound familiar, and neither does the name 'David', I must admit. It seems our circles have not fully overlapped just yet, Eli. But you have interested friends for sure. People gathering, brewing their own beer indoors in the afternoon is a cozy thought, quite a contrast from my friends who prefer the outdoors. Perhaps our paths will intersect more clearly in the future. For now, it's been quite the fascinating chat, don't you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, William, it seems we don't share any common acquaintances at the moment. But who knows? With our wide social circles, I wouldn't be surprised if we discover some mutual friends in the future. It was a pleasure chatting with you. Let's stay in touch, you never know when our paths might cross again.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Eli Dawson, your task is to act/speak as Eli Dawson would, keeping in mind Eli Dawson's social goal.\nYou can find Eli Dawson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Eli Dawson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Eli Dawson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Eli Dawson and William Brown\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. Eli's secrets: He secretly funds a college student\nWilliam Brown's background: \nEli Dawson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDavid: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Christian Moerlein Brewing Company Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nLarry: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nLynn: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Cray Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nDonald: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Advance Auto Parts Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nDennis: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nJane: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Planet Hollywood Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nHarvey: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: Sony Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nNinfa: Hobby: Quilting Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nAngelica: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Planet Hollywood Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \n\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Good evening, William! I'm Eli. Fancy a chat? I noticed some fascinating mix of people around. By chance, do you happen to enjoy the craft of homebrewing?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Good evening, Eli! I do appreciate a good homebrew every now and then, but my real passion lies in cooking, especially exploring new recipes. Speaking of hobbies, I have a friend who's completely taken up by acting. She spends her afternoons outdoor, often rehearsing her lines. Do you know of anyone with a hobby like that?\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"Ah, acting, a challenging hobby for sure. Most of my friends prefer a completely different kind of performance, creating delicious homebrews. But I do know a person who loves the great outdoors in the mornings. Quite the contrast with your friend who prefers the afternoons. Are your friend's name happen to start with an N or a D?\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"Interesting! I do know a couple of friends whose names start with 'N' and 'D'. Nancy is a keen dancer, she enjoys the Southern New England vibe while dancing outdoors in the afternoon. Dallas, on the other hand, shares the same passion for dancing, prefers the evenings, absorbing the calmness under the stars. Their energy and rhythm are addictive, to say the least!\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"Ah, dancing under the stars sounds magical! I have a couple of friends who'd surely enjoy such a vibrant atmosphere, but they're more into creating their own rhythm through homebrewing and amateur radio than dancing. And when it comes to afternoons, my pal Donald is more likely to be found outside creating some craft beer than swaying to the rhythm. He works at Advance Auto Parts. Does that ring a bell?\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"I can't say I know anyone from Advance Auto Parts. Most of my friends work in quite diverse companies, from Gentiva Health Services to Sony. I have a buddy, Harvey, who enjoys amateur radio, utilizes his afternoons indoor tuning into different stations. He works at Sony, quite adept at fixing stuff around. Likewise, another friend Lawrence, though he's more into outdoor activities like kayaking during the evenings. Has any of these sparked recognition?\"\n\nTurn #6: Eli Dawson said: \"Your friend Harvey at Sony does sound familiar, as one of my friends has quite a similar interest. Now that you've mentioned kayaking, it made me recall a friend of mine who is also drawn to outdoor activities. However, he's more into homebrewing than kayaking. He finds great tranquility being outdoors in the morning. Do either of your friends Larry or Dennis work at The J.M. Smucker Company, by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"It appears we might just circulate the same sphere, Eli! I have a friend Blake who enjoys dancing outdoors during the evening. He works at The J.M. Smucker Company. Much like your friends, he's very much into creating rhythm, albeit through dancing rather than homebrewing. Knowing him, he might just take up the hobby! Does the name 'Blake' ring a bell?\"\n\nTurn #8: Eli Dawson said: \"The name 'Blake' doesn't immediately ring a bell, but you never know. The world can feel like quite the small place sometimes, especially when you happen upon shared acquaintances. Much like your friend Blake, a friend of mine at The J.M. Smucker Company, Ninfa, absolutely savors the morning outdoor activities. Who knows, perhaps our paths have crossed more than we realized.\"\n\nTurn #9: William Brown said: \"Indeed Eli, it's quite fascinating how interconnected our circle might be. Speaking of mornings, I have a friend, Marie, who loves spending her afternoons acting outdoors. She works at Southern New England Telephone. And it's quite possible, given the shared interests, that our friends might know each other. Perhaps across some outdoor gathering or a company event.\"\n\nTurn #10: Eli Dawson said: \"Ah, an afternoon outdoor actor at Southern New England Telephone. It's quite splendid how hobbies link different people. You know, I have a bunch of friends who also enjoy spending their time outdoors, creating homebrews or tuning into different radio channels. Perhaps one day our circles might indeed intersect at an event, William. Till then, let's hope for some interesting coincidences. Anyway, does the name 'David' mean anything to you? He works at Christian Moerlein Brewing Company and usually spends his afternoons indoors.\"\n\nTurn #11: William Brown said: \"Christian Moerlein Brewing Company doesn't sound familiar, and neither does the name 'David', I must admit. It seems our circles have not fully overlapped just yet, Eli. But you have interested friends for sure. People gathering, brewing their own beer indoors in the afternoon is a cozy thought, quite a contrast from my friends who prefer the outdoors. Perhaps our paths will intersect more clearly in the future. For now, it's been quite the fascinating chat, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #12: Eli Dawson said: \"Indeed, William, it seems we don't share any common acquaintances at the moment. But who knows? With our wide social circles, I wouldn't be surprised if we discover some mutual friends in the future. It was a pleasure chatting with you. Let's stay in touch, you never know when our paths might cross again.\"\n\nTurn #13: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Eli. I truly enjoyed the conversation and the exploration of our acquaintances. Keep in touch, and hopefully we'll find those intersecting points in our circles sooner than later. Enjoy the evening!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Eli Dawson and William Brown\nEli Dawson's background: \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nEli Dawson's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMarie: Hobby: Acting Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nHarvey: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: Sony Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nFrank: Hobby: Deltiology Company: Ebonite International Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nVera: Hobby: Watching movies Company: Gentiva Health Services Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nLawrence: Hobby: Kayaking Company: Ebonite International Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nLouise: Hobby: Dancing Company: Cray Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nDallas: Hobby: Dancing Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nNancy: Hobby: Dancing Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nBlake: Hobby: Dancing Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Good evening, William! I'm Eli. Fancy a chat? I noticed some fascinating mix of people around. By chance, do you happen to enjoy the craft of homebrewing?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Good evening, Eli! I do appreciate a good homebrew every now and then, but my real passion lies in cooking, especially exploring new recipes. Speaking of hobbies, I have a friend who's completely taken up by acting. She spends her afternoons outdoor, often rehearsing her lines. Do you know of anyone with a hobby like that?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Eli Dawson and William Brown\nEli Dawson's background: \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nEli Dawson's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMarie: Hobby: Acting Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nHarvey: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: Sony Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nFrank: Hobby: Deltiology Company: Ebonite International Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nVera: Hobby: Watching movies Company: Gentiva Health Services Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nLawrence: Hobby: Kayaking Company: Ebonite International Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nLouise: Hobby: Dancing Company: Cray Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nDallas: Hobby: Dancing Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nNancy: Hobby: Dancing Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nBlake: Hobby: Dancing Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Good evening, William! I'm Eli. Fancy a chat? I noticed some fascinating mix of people around. By chance, do you happen to enjoy the craft of homebrewing?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Good evening, Eli! I do appreciate a good homebrew every now and then, but my real passion lies in cooking, especially exploring new recipes. Speaking of hobbies, I have a friend who's completely taken up by acting. She spends her afternoons outdoor, often rehearsing her lines. Do you know of anyone with a hobby like that?\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"Ah, acting, a challenging hobby for sure. Most of my friends prefer a completely different kind of performance, creating delicious homebrews. But I do know a person who loves the great outdoors in the mornings. Quite the contrast with your friend who prefers the afternoons. Are your friend's name happen to start with an N or a D?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Interesting! I do know a couple of friends whose names start with 'N' and 'D'. Nancy is a keen dancer, she enjoys the Southern New England vibe while dancing outdoors in the afternoon. Dallas, on the other hand, shares the same passion for dancing, prefers the evenings, absorbing the calmness under the stars. Their energy and rhythm are addictive, to say the least!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Eli Dawson and William Brown\nEli Dawson's background: \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nEli Dawson's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMarie: Hobby: Acting Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nHarvey: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: Sony Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nFrank: Hobby: Deltiology Company: Ebonite International Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nVera: Hobby: Watching movies Company: Gentiva Health Services Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nLawrence: Hobby: Kayaking Company: Ebonite International Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nLouise: Hobby: Dancing Company: Cray Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nDallas: Hobby: Dancing Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nNancy: Hobby: Dancing Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nBlake: Hobby: Dancing Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Good evening, William! I'm Eli. Fancy a chat? I noticed some fascinating mix of people around. By chance, do you happen to enjoy the craft of homebrewing?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Good evening, Eli! I do appreciate a good homebrew every now and then, but my real passion lies in cooking, especially exploring new recipes. Speaking of hobbies, I have a friend who's completely taken up by acting. She spends her afternoons outdoor, often rehearsing her lines. Do you know of anyone with a hobby like that?\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"Ah, acting, a challenging hobby for sure. Most of my friends prefer a completely different kind of performance, creating delicious homebrews. But I do know a person who loves the great outdoors in the mornings. Quite the contrast with your friend who prefers the afternoons. Are your friend's name happen to start with an N or a D?\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"Interesting! I do know a couple of friends whose names start with 'N' and 'D'. Nancy is a keen dancer, she enjoys the Southern New England vibe while dancing outdoors in the afternoon. Dallas, on the other hand, shares the same passion for dancing, prefers the evenings, absorbing the calmness under the stars. Their energy and rhythm are addictive, to say the least!\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"Ah, dancing under the stars sounds magical! I have a couple of friends who'd surely enjoy such a vibrant atmosphere, but they're more into creating their own rhythm through homebrewing and amateur radio than dancing. And when it comes to afternoons, my pal Donald is more likely to be found outside creating some craft beer than swaying to the rhythm. He works at Advance Auto Parts. Does that ring a bell?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I can't say I know anyone from Advance Auto Parts. Most of my friends work in quite diverse companies, from Gentiva Health Services to Sony. I have a buddy, Harvey, who enjoys amateur radio, utilizes his afternoons indoor tuning into different stations. He works at Sony, quite adept at fixing stuff around. Likewise, another friend Lawrence, though he's more into outdoor activities like kayaking during the evenings. Has any of these sparked recognition?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Eli Dawson and William Brown\nEli Dawson's background: \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nEli Dawson's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMarie: Hobby: Acting Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nHarvey: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: Sony Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nFrank: Hobby: Deltiology Company: Ebonite International Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nVera: Hobby: Watching movies Company: Gentiva Health Services Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nLawrence: Hobby: Kayaking Company: Ebonite International Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nLouise: Hobby: Dancing Company: Cray Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nDallas: Hobby: Dancing Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nNancy: Hobby: Dancing Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nBlake: Hobby: Dancing Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Good evening, William! I'm Eli. Fancy a chat? I noticed some fascinating mix of people around. By chance, do you happen to enjoy the craft of homebrewing?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Good evening, Eli! I do appreciate a good homebrew every now and then, but my real passion lies in cooking, especially exploring new recipes. Speaking of hobbies, I have a friend who's completely taken up by acting. She spends her afternoons outdoor, often rehearsing her lines. Do you know of anyone with a hobby like that?\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"Ah, acting, a challenging hobby for sure. Most of my friends prefer a completely different kind of performance, creating delicious homebrews. But I do know a person who loves the great outdoors in the mornings. Quite the contrast with your friend who prefers the afternoons. Are your friend's name happen to start with an N or a D?\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"Interesting! I do know a couple of friends whose names start with 'N' and 'D'. Nancy is a keen dancer, she enjoys the Southern New England vibe while dancing outdoors in the afternoon. Dallas, on the other hand, shares the same passion for dancing, prefers the evenings, absorbing the calmness under the stars. Their energy and rhythm are addictive, to say the least!\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"Ah, dancing under the stars sounds magical! I have a couple of friends who'd surely enjoy such a vibrant atmosphere, but they're more into creating their own rhythm through homebrewing and amateur radio than dancing. And when it comes to afternoons, my pal Donald is more likely to be found outside creating some craft beer than swaying to the rhythm. He works at Advance Auto Parts. Does that ring a bell?\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"I can't say I know anyone from Advance Auto Parts. Most of my friends work in quite diverse companies, from Gentiva Health Services to Sony. I have a buddy, Harvey, who enjoys amateur radio, utilizes his afternoons indoor tuning into different stations. He works at Sony, quite adept at fixing stuff around. Likewise, another friend Lawrence, though he's more into outdoor activities like kayaking during the evenings. Has any of these sparked recognition?\"\n\nTurn #6: Eli Dawson said: \"Your friend Harvey at Sony does sound familiar, as one of my friends has quite a similar interest. Now that you've mentioned kayaking, it made me recall a friend of mine who is also drawn to outdoor activities. However, he's more into homebrewing than kayaking. He finds great tranquility being outdoors in the morning. Do either of your friends Larry or Dennis work at The J.M. Smucker Company, by any chance?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"It appears we might just circulate the same sphere, Eli! I have a friend Blake who enjoys dancing outdoors during the evening. He works at The J.M. Smucker Company. Much like your friends, he's very much into creating rhythm, albeit through dancing rather than homebrewing. Knowing him, he might just take up the hobby! Does the name 'Blake' ring a bell?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Eli Dawson and William Brown\nEli Dawson's background: \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nEli Dawson's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMarie: Hobby: Acting Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nHarvey: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: Sony Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nFrank: Hobby: Deltiology Company: Ebonite International Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nVera: Hobby: Watching movies Company: Gentiva Health Services Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nLawrence: Hobby: Kayaking Company: Ebonite International Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nLouise: Hobby: Dancing Company: Cray Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nDallas: Hobby: Dancing Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nNancy: Hobby: Dancing Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nBlake: Hobby: Dancing Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Good evening, William! I'm Eli. Fancy a chat? I noticed some fascinating mix of people around. By chance, do you happen to enjoy the craft of homebrewing?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Good evening, Eli! I do appreciate a good homebrew every now and then, but my real passion lies in cooking, especially exploring new recipes. Speaking of hobbies, I have a friend who's completely taken up by acting. She spends her afternoons outdoor, often rehearsing her lines. Do you know of anyone with a hobby like that?\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"Ah, acting, a challenging hobby for sure. Most of my friends prefer a completely different kind of performance, creating delicious homebrews. But I do know a person who loves the great outdoors in the mornings. Quite the contrast with your friend who prefers the afternoons. Are your friend's name happen to start with an N or a D?\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"Interesting! I do know a couple of friends whose names start with 'N' and 'D'. Nancy is a keen dancer, she enjoys the Southern New England vibe while dancing outdoors in the afternoon. Dallas, on the other hand, shares the same passion for dancing, prefers the evenings, absorbing the calmness under the stars. Their energy and rhythm are addictive, to say the least!\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"Ah, dancing under the stars sounds magical! I have a couple of friends who'd surely enjoy such a vibrant atmosphere, but they're more into creating their own rhythm through homebrewing and amateur radio than dancing. And when it comes to afternoons, my pal Donald is more likely to be found outside creating some craft beer than swaying to the rhythm. He works at Advance Auto Parts. Does that ring a bell?\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"I can't say I know anyone from Advance Auto Parts. Most of my friends work in quite diverse companies, from Gentiva Health Services to Sony. I have a buddy, Harvey, who enjoys amateur radio, utilizes his afternoons indoor tuning into different stations. He works at Sony, quite adept at fixing stuff around. Likewise, another friend Lawrence, though he's more into outdoor activities like kayaking during the evenings. Has any of these sparked recognition?\"\n\nTurn #6: Eli Dawson said: \"Your friend Harvey at Sony does sound familiar, as one of my friends has quite a similar interest. Now that you've mentioned kayaking, it made me recall a friend of mine who is also drawn to outdoor activities. However, he's more into homebrewing than kayaking. He finds great tranquility being outdoors in the morning. Do either of your friends Larry or Dennis work at The J.M. Smucker Company, by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"It appears we might just circulate the same sphere, Eli! I have a friend Blake who enjoys dancing outdoors during the evening. He works at The J.M. Smucker Company. Much like your friends, he's very much into creating rhythm, albeit through dancing rather than homebrewing. Knowing him, he might just take up the hobby! Does the name 'Blake' ring a bell?\"\n\nTurn #8: Eli Dawson said: \"The name 'Blake' doesn't immediately ring a bell, but you never know. The world can feel like quite the small place sometimes, especially when you happen upon shared acquaintances. Much like your friend Blake, a friend of mine at The J.M. Smucker Company, Ninfa, absolutely savors the morning outdoor activities. Who knows, perhaps our paths have crossed more than we realized.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed Eli, it's quite fascinating how interconnected our circle might be. Speaking of mornings, I have a friend, Marie, who loves spending her afternoons acting outdoors. She works at Southern New England Telephone. And it's quite possible, given the shared interests, that our friends might know each other. Perhaps across some outdoor gathering or a company event.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Eli Dawson and William Brown\nEli Dawson's background: \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nEli Dawson's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMarie: Hobby: Acting Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nHarvey: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: Sony Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nFrank: Hobby: Deltiology Company: Ebonite International Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nVera: Hobby: Watching movies Company: Gentiva Health Services Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nLawrence: Hobby: Kayaking Company: Ebonite International Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nLouise: Hobby: Dancing Company: Cray Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nDallas: Hobby: Dancing Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nNancy: Hobby: Dancing Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nBlake: Hobby: Dancing Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Good evening, William! I'm Eli. Fancy a chat? I noticed some fascinating mix of people around. By chance, do you happen to enjoy the craft of homebrewing?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Good evening, Eli! I do appreciate a good homebrew every now and then, but my real passion lies in cooking, especially exploring new recipes. Speaking of hobbies, I have a friend who's completely taken up by acting. She spends her afternoons outdoor, often rehearsing her lines. Do you know of anyone with a hobby like that?\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"Ah, acting, a challenging hobby for sure. Most of my friends prefer a completely different kind of performance, creating delicious homebrews. But I do know a person who loves the great outdoors in the mornings. Quite the contrast with your friend who prefers the afternoons. Are your friend's name happen to start with an N or a D?\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"Interesting! I do know a couple of friends whose names start with 'N' and 'D'. Nancy is a keen dancer, she enjoys the Southern New England vibe while dancing outdoors in the afternoon. Dallas, on the other hand, shares the same passion for dancing, prefers the evenings, absorbing the calmness under the stars. Their energy and rhythm are addictive, to say the least!\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"Ah, dancing under the stars sounds magical! I have a couple of friends who'd surely enjoy such a vibrant atmosphere, but they're more into creating their own rhythm through homebrewing and amateur radio than dancing. And when it comes to afternoons, my pal Donald is more likely to be found outside creating some craft beer than swaying to the rhythm. He works at Advance Auto Parts. Does that ring a bell?\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"I can't say I know anyone from Advance Auto Parts. Most of my friends work in quite diverse companies, from Gentiva Health Services to Sony. I have a buddy, Harvey, who enjoys amateur radio, utilizes his afternoons indoor tuning into different stations. He works at Sony, quite adept at fixing stuff around. Likewise, another friend Lawrence, though he's more into outdoor activities like kayaking during the evenings. Has any of these sparked recognition?\"\n\nTurn #6: Eli Dawson said: \"Your friend Harvey at Sony does sound familiar, as one of my friends has quite a similar interest. Now that you've mentioned kayaking, it made me recall a friend of mine who is also drawn to outdoor activities. However, he's more into homebrewing than kayaking. He finds great tranquility being outdoors in the morning. Do either of your friends Larry or Dennis work at The J.M. Smucker Company, by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"It appears we might just circulate the same sphere, Eli! I have a friend Blake who enjoys dancing outdoors during the evening. He works at The J.M. Smucker Company. Much like your friends, he's very much into creating rhythm, albeit through dancing rather than homebrewing. Knowing him, he might just take up the hobby! Does the name 'Blake' ring a bell?\"\n\nTurn #8: Eli Dawson said: \"The name 'Blake' doesn't immediately ring a bell, but you never know. The world can feel like quite the small place sometimes, especially when you happen upon shared acquaintances. Much like your friend Blake, a friend of mine at The J.M. Smucker Company, Ninfa, absolutely savors the morning outdoor activities. Who knows, perhaps our paths have crossed more than we realized.\"\n\nTurn #9: William Brown said: \"Indeed Eli, it's quite fascinating how interconnected our circle might be. Speaking of mornings, I have a friend, Marie, who loves spending her afternoons acting outdoors. She works at Southern New England Telephone. And it's quite possible, given the shared interests, that our friends might know each other. Perhaps across some outdoor gathering or a company event.\"\n\nTurn #10: Eli Dawson said: \"Ah, an afternoon outdoor actor at Southern New England Telephone. It's quite splendid how hobbies link different people. You know, I have a bunch of friends who also enjoy spending their time outdoors, creating homebrews or tuning into different radio channels. Perhaps one day our circles might indeed intersect at an event, William. Till then, let's hope for some interesting coincidences. Anyway, does the name 'David' mean anything to you? He works at Christian Moerlein Brewing Company and usually spends his afternoons indoors.\"\n\nTurn #11: William Brown said: \"Christian Moerlein Brewing Company doesn't sound familiar, and neither does the name 'David', I must admit. It seems our circles have not fully overlapped just yet, Eli. But you have interested friends for sure. People gathering, brewing their own beer indoors in the afternoon is a cozy thought, quite a contrast from my friends who prefer the outdoors. Perhaps our paths will intersect more clearly in the future. For now, it's been quite the fascinating chat, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #12: Eli Dawson said: \"Indeed, William, it seems we don't share any common acquaintances at the moment. But who knows? With our wide social circles, I wouldn't be surprised if we discover some mutual friends in the future. It was a pleasure chatting with you. Let's stay in touch, you never know when our paths might cross again.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Eli. I truly enjoyed the conversation and the exploration of our acquaintances. Keep in touch, and hopefully we'll find those intersecting points in our circles sooner than later. Enjoy the evening!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Eli Dawson and William Brown\nEli Dawson's background: \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nEli Dawson's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMarie: Hobby: Acting Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nHarvey: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: Sony Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nFrank: Hobby: Deltiology Company: Ebonite International Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nVera: Hobby: Watching movies Company: Gentiva Health Services Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nLawrence: Hobby: Kayaking Company: Ebonite International Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nLouise: Hobby: Dancing Company: Cray Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nDallas: Hobby: Dancing Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nNancy: Hobby: Dancing Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nBlake: Hobby: Dancing Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Good evening, William! I'm Eli. Fancy a chat? I noticed some fascinating mix of people around. By chance, do you happen to enjoy the craft of homebrewing?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Good evening, Eli! I do appreciate a good homebrew every now and then, but my real passion lies in cooking, especially exploring new recipes. Speaking of hobbies, I have a friend who's completely taken up by acting. She spends her afternoons outdoor, often rehearsing her lines. Do you know of anyone with a hobby like that?\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"Ah, acting, a challenging hobby for sure. Most of my friends prefer a completely different kind of performance, creating delicious homebrews. But I do know a person who loves the great outdoors in the mornings. Quite the contrast with your friend who prefers the afternoons. Are your friend's name happen to start with an N or a D?\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"Interesting! I do know a couple of friends whose names start with 'N' and 'D'. Nancy is a keen dancer, she enjoys the Southern New England vibe while dancing outdoors in the afternoon. Dallas, on the other hand, shares the same passion for dancing, prefers the evenings, absorbing the calmness under the stars. Their energy and rhythm are addictive, to say the least!\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"Ah, dancing under the stars sounds magical! I have a couple of friends who'd surely enjoy such a vibrant atmosphere, but they're more into creating their own rhythm through homebrewing and amateur radio than dancing. And when it comes to afternoons, my pal Donald is more likely to be found outside creating some craft beer than swaying to the rhythm. He works at Advance Auto Parts. Does that ring a bell?\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"I can't say I know anyone from Advance Auto Parts. Most of my friends work in quite diverse companies, from Gentiva Health Services to Sony. I have a buddy, Harvey, who enjoys amateur radio, utilizes his afternoons indoor tuning into different stations. He works at Sony, quite adept at fixing stuff around. Likewise, another friend Lawrence, though he's more into outdoor activities like kayaking during the evenings. Has any of these sparked recognition?\"\n\nTurn #6: Eli Dawson said: \"Your friend Harvey at Sony does sound familiar, as one of my friends has quite a similar interest. Now that you've mentioned kayaking, it made me recall a friend of mine who is also drawn to outdoor activities. However, he's more into homebrewing than kayaking. He finds great tranquility being outdoors in the morning. Do either of your friends Larry or Dennis work at The J.M. Smucker Company, by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"It appears we might just circulate the same sphere, Eli! I have a friend Blake who enjoys dancing outdoors during the evening. He works at The J.M. Smucker Company. Much like your friends, he's very much into creating rhythm, albeit through dancing rather than homebrewing. Knowing him, he might just take up the hobby! Does the name 'Blake' ring a bell?\"\n\nTurn #8: Eli Dawson said: \"The name 'Blake' doesn't immediately ring a bell, but you never know. The world can feel like quite the small place sometimes, especially when you happen upon shared acquaintances. Much like your friend Blake, a friend of mine at The J.M. Smucker Company, Ninfa, absolutely savors the morning outdoor activities. Who knows, perhaps our paths have crossed more than we realized.\"\n\nTurn #9: William Brown said: \"Indeed Eli, it's quite fascinating how interconnected our circle might be. Speaking of mornings, I have a friend, Marie, who loves spending her afternoons acting outdoors. She works at Southern New England Telephone. And it's quite possible, given the shared interests, that our friends might know each other. Perhaps across some outdoor gathering or a company event.\"\n\nTurn #10: Eli Dawson said: \"Ah, an afternoon outdoor actor at Southern New England Telephone. It's quite splendid how hobbies link different people. You know, I have a bunch of friends who also enjoy spending their time outdoors, creating homebrews or tuning into different radio channels. Perhaps one day our circles might indeed intersect at an event, William. Till then, let's hope for some interesting coincidences. Anyway, does the name 'David' mean anything to you? He works at Christian Moerlein Brewing Company and usually spends his afternoons indoors.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Christian Moerlein Brewing Company doesn't sound familiar, and neither does the name 'David', I must admit. It seems our circles have not fully overlapped just yet, Eli. But you have interested friends for sure. People gathering, brewing their own beer indoors in the afternoon is a cozy thought, quite a contrast from my friends who prefer the outdoors. Perhaps our paths will intersect more clearly in the future. For now, it's been quite the fascinating chat, don't you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Eli Dawson and William Brown\nEli Dawson's background: \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nEli Dawson's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMarie: Hobby: Acting Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nHarvey: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: Sony Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nFrank: Hobby: Deltiology Company: Ebonite International Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nVera: Hobby: Watching movies Company: Gentiva Health Services Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nLawrence: Hobby: Kayaking Company: Ebonite International Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nLouise: Hobby: Dancing Company: Cray Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nDallas: Hobby: Dancing Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nNancy: Hobby: Dancing Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nBlake: Hobby: Dancing Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Good evening, William! I'm Eli. Fancy a chat? I noticed some fascinating mix of people around. By chance, do you happen to enjoy the craft of homebrewing?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Good evening, Eli! I do appreciate a good homebrew every now and then, but my real passion lies in cooking, especially exploring new recipes. Speaking of hobbies, I have a friend who's completely taken up by acting. She spends her afternoons outdoor, often rehearsing her lines. Do you know of anyone with a hobby like that?\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"Ah, acting, a challenging hobby for sure. Most of my friends prefer a completely different kind of performance, creating delicious homebrews. But I do know a person who loves the great outdoors in the mornings. Quite the contrast with your friend who prefers the afternoons. Are your friend's name happen to start with an N or a D?\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"Interesting! I do know a couple of friends whose names start with 'N' and 'D'. Nancy is a keen dancer, she enjoys the Southern New England vibe while dancing outdoors in the afternoon. Dallas, on the other hand, shares the same passion for dancing, prefers the evenings, absorbing the calmness under the stars. Their energy and rhythm are addictive, to say the least!\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"Ah, dancing under the stars sounds magical! I have a couple of friends who'd surely enjoy such a vibrant atmosphere, but they're more into creating their own rhythm through homebrewing and amateur radio than dancing. And when it comes to afternoons, my pal Donald is more likely to be found outside creating some craft beer than swaying to the rhythm. He works at Advance Auto Parts. Does that ring a bell?\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"I can't say I know anyone from Advance Auto Parts. Most of my friends work in quite diverse companies, from Gentiva Health Services to Sony. I have a buddy, Harvey, who enjoys amateur radio, utilizes his afternoons indoor tuning into different stations. He works at Sony, quite adept at fixing stuff around. Likewise, another friend Lawrence, though he's more into outdoor activities like kayaking during the evenings. Has any of these sparked recognition?\"\n\nTurn #6: Eli Dawson said: \"Your friend Harvey at Sony does sound familiar, as one of my friends has quite a similar interest. Now that you've mentioned kayaking, it made me recall a friend of mine who is also drawn to outdoor activities. However, he's more into homebrewing than kayaking. He finds great tranquility being outdoors in the morning. Do either of your friends Larry or Dennis work at The J.M. Smucker Company, by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"It appears we might just circulate the same sphere, Eli! I have a friend Blake who enjoys dancing outdoors during the evening. He works at The J.M. Smucker Company. Much like your friends, he's very much into creating rhythm, albeit through dancing rather than homebrewing. Knowing him, he might just take up the hobby! Does the name 'Blake' ring a bell?\"\n\nTurn #8: Eli Dawson said: \"The name 'Blake' doesn't immediately ring a bell, but you never know. The world can feel like quite the small place sometimes, especially when you happen upon shared acquaintances. Much like your friend Blake, a friend of mine at The J.M. Smucker Company, Ninfa, absolutely savors the morning outdoor activities. Who knows, perhaps our paths have crossed more than we realized.\"\n\nTurn #9: William Brown said: \"Indeed Eli, it's quite fascinating how interconnected our circle might be. Speaking of mornings, I have a friend, Marie, who loves spending her afternoons acting outdoors. She works at Southern New England Telephone. And it's quite possible, given the shared interests, that our friends might know each other. Perhaps across some outdoor gathering or a company event.\"\n\nTurn #10: Eli Dawson said: \"Ah, an afternoon outdoor actor at Southern New England Telephone. It's quite splendid how hobbies link different people. You know, I have a bunch of friends who also enjoy spending their time outdoors, creating homebrews or tuning into different radio channels. Perhaps one day our circles might indeed intersect at an event, William. Till then, let's hope for some interesting coincidences. Anyway, does the name 'David' mean anything to you? He works at Christian Moerlein Brewing Company and usually spends his afternoons indoors.\"\n\nTurn #11: William Brown said: \"Christian Moerlein Brewing Company doesn't sound familiar, and neither does the name 'David', I must admit. It seems our circles have not fully overlapped just yet, Eli. But you have interested friends for sure. People gathering, brewing their own beer indoors in the afternoon is a cozy thought, quite a contrast from my friends who prefer the outdoors. Perhaps our paths will intersect more clearly in the future. For now, it's been quite the fascinating chat, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #12: Eli Dawson said: \"Indeed, William, it seems we don't share any common acquaintances at the moment. But who knows? With our wide social circles, I wouldn't be surprised if we discover some mutual friends in the future. It was a pleasure chatting with you. Let's stay in touch, you never know when our paths might cross again.\"\n\nTurn #13: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Eli. I truly enjoyed the conversation and the exploration of our acquaintances. Keep in touch, and hopefully we'll find those intersecting points in our circles sooner than later. Enjoy the evening!\"\n\nTurn #14: Eli Dawson left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Eli Dawson, your task is to act/speak as Eli Dawson would, keeping in mind Eli Dawson's social goal.\nYou can find Eli Dawson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Eli Dawson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Eli Dawson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are meeting for the first time at a social event. They find each other attractive and decide to engage in a conversation\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and William Brown\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. Eli's secrets: He secretly funds a college student\nWilliam Brown's background: \nEli Dawson's goal: Flirt with the other person (Extra information: you are attracted to the other person and want to build a romantic relationship with them)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Good evening, I couldn't help but notice you across the room. I am Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist by trade but an avid lover of vintage books and history in my spare time. What about you? What brings you here tonight?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Eli Dawson, your task is to act/speak as Eli Dawson would, keeping in mind Eli Dawson's social goal.\nYou can find Eli Dawson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Eli Dawson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Eli Dawson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are meeting for the first time at a social event. They find each other attractive and decide to engage in a conversation\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and William Brown\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. Eli's secrets: He secretly funds a college student\nWilliam Brown's background: \nEli Dawson's goal: Flirt with the other person (Extra information: you are attracted to the other person and want to build a romantic relationship with them)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Good evening, I couldn't help but notice you across the room. I am Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist by trade but an avid lover of vintage books and history in my spare time. What about you? What brings you here tonight?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Good evening, Eli Dawson. It's a pleasure to meet you. I'm William Brown, a chef who gets a kick out of culinary adventures and loves to explore the local food scene. My interest in food brought me to this event. By the way, it's rare to meet a forensic psychiatrist who's also an enthusiast of vintage books and history. I must admit, that's quite intriguing. Do you have a particular historical period or type of vintage book that you're partial to?\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"Delightful to meet you too, William. A chef who loves culinary adventures? Quite the Renaissance man! The mingling of flavors in the culinary world reminds me of different historical events intersecting. I find myself drawn to the Victorian era the most, with its fascinating blend of progress and tradition, much like a well-constructed dish. But enough about me, do you have a favorite cuisine or dish that you're passionate about? Perhaps we can discuss it over a cozy dinner?\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"Indeed, there's certain artistry in creating a well-crafted dish - blending flavors much like the weaving of historical events you mentioned. As for my favorite, I have an affinity for Italian cuisine. And I'd be delighted to discuss food and history more over dinner, that certainly sounds like an evening well-spent. Let's keep it casual and easeful, how about we cook together? An interesting fact about the Victorian era is that it actually influenced modern cookery. It'd be great to merge our interests into one experience, what do you think, Eli?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"The thought of blending our interests into a culinary escapade sounds incredibly fascinating, William. A dash of the Victorian era, a sprinkle of Italian flavors, and a lot of shared intellectual conversation, this certainly promises to be an evening to remember. I'm onboard with the idea. I'll look forward to our cooking date with great anticipation. Shall we plan for next weekend, then?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Eli Dawson, your task is to act/speak as Eli Dawson would, keeping in mind Eli Dawson's social goal.\nYou can find Eli Dawson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Eli Dawson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Eli Dawson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are meeting for the first time at a social event. They find each other attractive and decide to engage in a conversation\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and William Brown\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. Eli's secrets: He secretly funds a college student\nWilliam Brown's background: \nEli Dawson's goal: Flirt with the other person (Extra information: you are attracted to the other person and want to build a romantic relationship with them)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Good evening, I couldn't help but notice you across the room. I am Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist by trade but an avid lover of vintage books and history in my spare time. What about you? What brings you here tonight?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Good evening, Eli Dawson. It's a pleasure to meet you. I'm William Brown, a chef who gets a kick out of culinary adventures and loves to explore the local food scene. My interest in food brought me to this event. By the way, it's rare to meet a forensic psychiatrist who's also an enthusiast of vintage books and history. I must admit, that's quite intriguing. Do you have a particular historical period or type of vintage book that you're partial to?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Delightful to meet you too, William. A chef who loves culinary adventures? Quite the Renaissance man! The mingling of flavors in the culinary world reminds me of different historical events intersecting. I find myself drawn to the Victorian era the most, with its fascinating blend of progress and tradition, much like a well-constructed dish. But enough about me, do you have a favorite cuisine or dish that you're passionate about? Perhaps we can discuss it over a cozy dinner?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Eli Dawson, your task is to act/speak as Eli Dawson would, keeping in mind Eli Dawson's social goal.\nYou can find Eli Dawson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Eli Dawson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Eli Dawson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are meeting for the first time at a social event. They find each other attractive and decide to engage in a conversation\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and William Brown\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. Eli's secrets: He secretly funds a college student\nWilliam Brown's background: \nEli Dawson's goal: Flirt with the other person (Extra information: you are attracted to the other person and want to build a romantic relationship with them)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Good evening, I couldn't help but notice you across the room. I am Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist by trade but an avid lover of vintage books and history in my spare time. What about you? What brings you here tonight?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Good evening, Eli Dawson. It's a pleasure to meet you. I'm William Brown, a chef who gets a kick out of culinary adventures and loves to explore the local food scene. My interest in food brought me to this event. By the way, it's rare to meet a forensic psychiatrist who's also an enthusiast of vintage books and history. I must admit, that's quite intriguing. Do you have a particular historical period or type of vintage book that you're partial to?\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"Delightful to meet you too, William. A chef who loves culinary adventures? Quite the Renaissance man! The mingling of flavors in the culinary world reminds me of different historical events intersecting. I find myself drawn to the Victorian era the most, with its fascinating blend of progress and tradition, much like a well-constructed dish. But enough about me, do you have a favorite cuisine or dish that you're passionate about? Perhaps we can discuss it over a cozy dinner?\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"Indeed, there's certain artistry in creating a well-crafted dish - blending flavors much like the weaving of historical events you mentioned. As for my favorite, I have an affinity for Italian cuisine. And I'd be delighted to discuss food and history more over dinner, that certainly sounds like an evening well-spent. Let's keep it casual and easeful, how about we cook together? An interesting fact about the Victorian era is that it actually influenced modern cookery. It'd be great to merge our interests into one experience, what do you think, Eli?\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"The thought of blending our interests into a culinary escapade sounds incredibly fascinating, William. A dash of the Victorian era, a sprinkle of Italian flavors, and a lot of shared intellectual conversation, this certainly promises to be an evening to remember. I'm onboard with the idea. I'll look forward to our cooking date with great anticipation. Shall we plan for next weekend, then?\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"That sounds like a plan, Eli. Next weekend it is! I'm quite excited about this venture of ours. It's not every day that one gets to combine history and culinary skills. Let's exchange details so we can finalize the specifics over the week. It's certainly been a pleasure meeting you today.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Splendid, William. I'm excited as well for this unique blend of our passions. Here's my card for contact. Looking forward to our date next weekend. It was indeed a pleasure meeting you.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Eli Dawson, your task is to act/speak as Eli Dawson would, keeping in mind Eli Dawson's social goal.\nYou can find Eli Dawson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Eli Dawson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Eli Dawson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are meeting for the first time at a social event. They find each other attractive and decide to engage in a conversation\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and William Brown\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. Eli's secrets: He secretly funds a college student\nWilliam Brown's background: \nEli Dawson's goal: Flirt with the other person (Extra information: you are attracted to the other person and want to build a romantic relationship with them)\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Good evening, I couldn't help but notice you across the room. I am Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist by trade but an avid lover of vintage books and history in my spare time. What about you? What brings you here tonight?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Good evening, Eli Dawson. It's a pleasure to meet you. I'm William Brown, a chef who gets a kick out of culinary adventures and loves to explore the local food scene. My interest in food brought me to this event. By the way, it's rare to meet a forensic psychiatrist who's also an enthusiast of vintage books and history. I must admit, that's quite intriguing. Do you have a particular historical period or type of vintage book that you're partial to?\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"Delightful to meet you too, William. A chef who loves culinary adventures? Quite the Renaissance man! The mingling of flavors in the culinary world reminds me of different historical events intersecting. I find myself drawn to the Victorian era the most, with its fascinating blend of progress and tradition, much like a well-constructed dish. But enough about me, do you have a favorite cuisine or dish that you're passionate about? Perhaps we can discuss it over a cozy dinner?\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"Indeed, there's certain artistry in creating a well-crafted dish - blending flavors much like the weaving of historical events you mentioned. As for my favorite, I have an affinity for Italian cuisine. And I'd be delighted to discuss food and history more over dinner, that certainly sounds like an evening well-spent. Let's keep it casual and easeful, how about we cook together? An interesting fact about the Victorian era is that it actually influenced modern cookery. It'd be great to merge our interests into one experience, what do you think, Eli?\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"The thought of blending our interests into a culinary escapade sounds incredibly fascinating, William. A dash of the Victorian era, a sprinkle of Italian flavors, and a lot of shared intellectual conversation, this certainly promises to be an evening to remember. I'm onboard with the idea. I'll look forward to our cooking date with great anticipation. Shall we plan for next weekend, then?\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"That sounds like a plan, Eli. Next weekend it is! I'm quite excited about this venture of ours. It's not every day that one gets to combine history and culinary skills. Let's exchange details so we can finalize the specifics over the week. It's certainly been a pleasure meeting you today.\"\n\nTurn #6: Eli Dawson said: \"Splendid, William. I'm excited as well for this unique blend of our passions. Here's my card for contact. Looking forward to our date next weekend. It was indeed a pleasure meeting you.\"\n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"I've enjoyed getting to know you tonight, Eli. Here's my number, I'm looking forward to our cooking date next weekend. It will indeed be an evening to remember. Goodnight for now.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are meeting for the first time at a social event. They find each other attractive and decide to engage in a conversation\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and William Brown\nEli Dawson's background: \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nEli Dawson's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: Maintain a comfortable yet engaging conversation (Extra information: you are attracted to the other person but you don't want to make them feel uncomfortable or pressured)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Good evening, I couldn't help but notice you across the room. I am Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist by trade but an avid lover of vintage books and history in my spare time. What about you? What brings you here tonight?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Good evening, Eli Dawson. It's a pleasure to meet you. I'm William Brown, a chef who gets a kick out of culinary adventures and loves to explore the local food scene. My interest in food brought me to this event. By the way, it's rare to meet a forensic psychiatrist who's also an enthusiast of vintage books and history. I must admit, that's quite intriguing. Do you have a particular historical period or type of vintage book that you're partial to?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are meeting for the first time at a social event. They find each other attractive and decide to engage in a conversation\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and William Brown\nEli Dawson's background: \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nEli Dawson's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: Maintain a comfortable yet engaging conversation (Extra information: you are attracted to the other person but you don't want to make them feel uncomfortable or pressured)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Good evening, I couldn't help but notice you across the room. I am Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist by trade but an avid lover of vintage books and history in my spare time. What about you? What brings you here tonight?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Good evening, Eli Dawson. It's a pleasure to meet you. I'm William Brown, a chef who gets a kick out of culinary adventures and loves to explore the local food scene. My interest in food brought me to this event. By the way, it's rare to meet a forensic psychiatrist who's also an enthusiast of vintage books and history. I must admit, that's quite intriguing. Do you have a particular historical period or type of vintage book that you're partial to?\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"Delightful to meet you too, William. A chef who loves culinary adventures? Quite the Renaissance man! The mingling of flavors in the culinary world reminds me of different historical events intersecting. I find myself drawn to the Victorian era the most, with its fascinating blend of progress and tradition, much like a well-constructed dish. But enough about me, do you have a favorite cuisine or dish that you're passionate about? Perhaps we can discuss it over a cozy dinner?\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"Indeed, there's certain artistry in creating a well-crafted dish - blending flavors much like the weaving of historical events you mentioned. As for my favorite, I have an affinity for Italian cuisine. And I'd be delighted to discuss food and history more over dinner, that certainly sounds like an evening well-spent. Let's keep it casual and easeful, how about we cook together? An interesting fact about the Victorian era is that it actually influenced modern cookery. It'd be great to merge our interests into one experience, what do you think, Eli?\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"The thought of blending our interests into a culinary escapade sounds incredibly fascinating, William. A dash of the Victorian era, a sprinkle of Italian flavors, and a lot of shared intellectual conversation, this certainly promises to be an evening to remember. I'm onboard with the idea. I'll look forward to our cooking date with great anticipation. Shall we plan for next weekend, then?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds like a plan, Eli. Next weekend it is! I'm quite excited about this venture of ours. It's not every day that one gets to combine history and culinary skills. Let's exchange details so we can finalize the specifics over the week. It's certainly been a pleasure meeting you today.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are meeting for the first time at a social event. They find each other attractive and decide to engage in a conversation\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and William Brown\nEli Dawson's background: \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nEli Dawson's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: Maintain a comfortable yet engaging conversation (Extra information: you are attracted to the other person but you don't want to make them feel uncomfortable or pressured)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Good evening, I couldn't help but notice you across the room. I am Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist by trade but an avid lover of vintage books and history in my spare time. What about you? What brings you here tonight?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Good evening, Eli Dawson. It's a pleasure to meet you. I'm William Brown, a chef who gets a kick out of culinary adventures and loves to explore the local food scene. My interest in food brought me to this event. By the way, it's rare to meet a forensic psychiatrist who's also an enthusiast of vintage books and history. I must admit, that's quite intriguing. Do you have a particular historical period or type of vintage book that you're partial to?\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"Delightful to meet you too, William. A chef who loves culinary adventures? Quite the Renaissance man! The mingling of flavors in the culinary world reminds me of different historical events intersecting. I find myself drawn to the Victorian era the most, with its fascinating blend of progress and tradition, much like a well-constructed dish. But enough about me, do you have a favorite cuisine or dish that you're passionate about? Perhaps we can discuss it over a cozy dinner?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, there's certain artistry in creating a well-crafted dish - blending flavors much like the weaving of historical events you mentioned. As for my favorite, I have an affinity for Italian cuisine. And I'd be delighted to discuss food and history more over dinner, that certainly sounds like an evening well-spent. Let's keep it casual and easeful, how about we cook together? An interesting fact about the Victorian era is that it actually influenced modern cookery. It'd be great to merge our interests into one experience, what do you think, Eli?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are meeting for the first time at a social event. They find each other attractive and decide to engage in a conversation\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and William Brown\nEli Dawson's background: \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nEli Dawson's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: Maintain a comfortable yet engaging conversation (Extra information: you are attracted to the other person but you don't want to make them feel uncomfortable or pressured)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Good evening, I couldn't help but notice you across the room. I am Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist by trade but an avid lover of vintage books and history in my spare time. What about you? What brings you here tonight?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Good evening, Eli Dawson. It's a pleasure to meet you. I'm William Brown, a chef who gets a kick out of culinary adventures and loves to explore the local food scene. My interest in food brought me to this event. By the way, it's rare to meet a forensic psychiatrist who's also an enthusiast of vintage books and history. I must admit, that's quite intriguing. Do you have a particular historical period or type of vintage book that you're partial to?\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"Delightful to meet you too, William. A chef who loves culinary adventures? Quite the Renaissance man! The mingling of flavors in the culinary world reminds me of different historical events intersecting. I find myself drawn to the Victorian era the most, with its fascinating blend of progress and tradition, much like a well-constructed dish. But enough about me, do you have a favorite cuisine or dish that you're passionate about? Perhaps we can discuss it over a cozy dinner?\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"Indeed, there's certain artistry in creating a well-crafted dish - blending flavors much like the weaving of historical events you mentioned. As for my favorite, I have an affinity for Italian cuisine. And I'd be delighted to discuss food and history more over dinner, that certainly sounds like an evening well-spent. Let's keep it casual and easeful, how about we cook together? An interesting fact about the Victorian era is that it actually influenced modern cookery. It'd be great to merge our interests into one experience, what do you think, Eli?\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"The thought of blending our interests into a culinary escapade sounds incredibly fascinating, William. A dash of the Victorian era, a sprinkle of Italian flavors, and a lot of shared intellectual conversation, this certainly promises to be an evening to remember. I'm onboard with the idea. I'll look forward to our cooking date with great anticipation. Shall we plan for next weekend, then?\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"That sounds like a plan, Eli. Next weekend it is! I'm quite excited about this venture of ours. It's not every day that one gets to combine history and culinary skills. Let's exchange details so we can finalize the specifics over the week. It's certainly been a pleasure meeting you today.\"\n\nTurn #6: Eli Dawson said: \"Splendid, William. I'm excited as well for this unique blend of our passions. Here's my card for contact. Looking forward to our date next weekend. It was indeed a pleasure meeting you.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I've enjoyed getting to know you tonight, Eli. Here's my number, I'm looking forward to our cooking date next weekend. It will indeed be an evening to remember. Goodnight for now.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are meeting for the first time at a social event. They find each other attractive and decide to engage in a conversation\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and William Brown\nEli Dawson's background: \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nEli Dawson's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: Maintain a comfortable yet engaging conversation (Extra information: you are attracted to the other person but you don't want to make them feel uncomfortable or pressured)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Good evening, I couldn't help but notice you across the room. I am Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist by trade but an avid lover of vintage books and history in my spare time. What about you? What brings you here tonight?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Good evening, Eli Dawson. It's a pleasure to meet you. I'm William Brown, a chef who gets a kick out of culinary adventures and loves to explore the local food scene. My interest in food brought me to this event. By the way, it's rare to meet a forensic psychiatrist who's also an enthusiast of vintage books and history. I must admit, that's quite intriguing. Do you have a particular historical period or type of vintage book that you're partial to?\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"Delightful to meet you too, William. A chef who loves culinary adventures? Quite the Renaissance man! The mingling of flavors in the culinary world reminds me of different historical events intersecting. I find myself drawn to the Victorian era the most, with its fascinating blend of progress and tradition, much like a well-constructed dish. But enough about me, do you have a favorite cuisine or dish that you're passionate about? Perhaps we can discuss it over a cozy dinner?\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"Indeed, there's certain artistry in creating a well-crafted dish - blending flavors much like the weaving of historical events you mentioned. As for my favorite, I have an affinity for Italian cuisine. And I'd be delighted to discuss food and history more over dinner, that certainly sounds like an evening well-spent. Let's keep it casual and easeful, how about we cook together? An interesting fact about the Victorian era is that it actually influenced modern cookery. It'd be great to merge our interests into one experience, what do you think, Eli?\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"The thought of blending our interests into a culinary escapade sounds incredibly fascinating, William. A dash of the Victorian era, a sprinkle of Italian flavors, and a lot of shared intellectual conversation, this certainly promises to be an evening to remember. I'm onboard with the idea. I'll look forward to our cooking date with great anticipation. Shall we plan for next weekend, then?\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"That sounds like a plan, Eli. Next weekend it is! I'm quite excited about this venture of ours. It's not every day that one gets to combine history and culinary skills. Let's exchange details so we can finalize the specifics over the week. It's certainly been a pleasure meeting you today.\"\n\nTurn #6: Eli Dawson said: \"Splendid, William. I'm excited as well for this unique blend of our passions. Here's my card for contact. Looking forward to our date next weekend. It was indeed a pleasure meeting you.\"\n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"I've enjoyed getting to know you tonight, Eli. Here's my number, I'm looking forward to our cooking date next weekend. It will indeed be an evening to remember. Goodnight for now.\"\n\nTurn #8: Eli Dawson left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Benjamin Jackson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nBenjamin Jackson's background: \nDonovan Reeves's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nChris: Hobby: Mountain biking Company: Henry Schein, Inc. \nChester: Hobby: Surfing Company: Maxim Integrated \nWendell: Hobby: Surfing Company: Maxim Integrated \nDemetrius: Hobby: Mountain biking Company: Maxim Integrated \nJacob: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Maxim Integrated \n\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Hey there, Benjamin! Are you into any kind of adrenaline-rush hobbies, like mountain biking or surfing, by any chance?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Benjamin Jackson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nBenjamin Jackson's background: \nDonovan Reeves's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nChris: Hobby: Mountain biking Company: Henry Schein, Inc. \nChester: Hobby: Surfing Company: Maxim Integrated \nWendell: Hobby: Surfing Company: Maxim Integrated \nDemetrius: Hobby: Mountain biking Company: Maxim Integrated \nJacob: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Maxim Integrated \n\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey there, Benjamin! Are you into any kind of adrenaline-rush hobbies, like mountain biking or surfing, by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hi Donovan! Nature activities excite me more, hiking and birding are my favorites. Although, I have a friend Jacob who is into shooting sports, seems like his kind of adrenaline rush. How about you? Are you more into physical activities or do you have any indoor hobbies as well?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ah, my job as a software developer mostly keeps me indoors, but being an avid gamer and participating in global coding competitions can be quite thrilling. It's quite a coincidence, my friend Jacob is also into shooting sports! Does your Jacob happen to work at Maxim Integrated too?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Benjamin Jackson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nBenjamin Jackson's background: \nDonovan Reeves's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nChris: Hobby: Mountain biking Company: Henry Schein, Inc. \nChester: Hobby: Surfing Company: Maxim Integrated \nWendell: Hobby: Surfing Company: Maxim Integrated \nDemetrius: Hobby: Mountain biking Company: Maxim Integrated \nJacob: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Maxim Integrated \n\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey there, Benjamin! Are you into any kind of adrenaline-rush hobbies, like mountain biking or surfing, by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hi Donovan! Nature activities excite me more, hiking and birding are my favorites. Although, I have a friend Jacob who is into shooting sports, seems like his kind of adrenaline rush. How about you? Are you more into physical activities or do you have any indoor hobbies as well?\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"Ah, my job as a software developer mostly keeps me indoors, but being an avid gamer and participating in global coding competitions can be quite thrilling. It's quite a coincidence, my friend Jacob is also into shooting sports! Does your Jacob happen to work at Maxim Integrated too?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's indeed a small world! Yes, my friend Jacob does work at Maxim Integrated. How interesting that we know the same person. Do you also happen to know anyone from the food industry, like, say, Gordon Food Service?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"No, I don't think I know anyone from the food industry. However, I'm in the tech industry as a software developer, so I know quite a few people at companies like Maxim Integrated and Henry Schein, Inc. Do you happen to know anyone there too?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Benjamin Jackson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nBenjamin Jackson's background: \nDonovan Reeves's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nChris: Hobby: Mountain biking Company: Henry Schein, Inc. \nChester: Hobby: Surfing Company: Maxim Integrated \nWendell: Hobby: Surfing Company: Maxim Integrated \nDemetrius: Hobby: Mountain biking Company: Maxim Integrated \nJacob: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Maxim Integrated \n\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey there, Benjamin! Are you into any kind of adrenaline-rush hobbies, like mountain biking or surfing, by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hi Donovan! Nature activities excite me more, hiking and birding are my favorites. Although, I have a friend Jacob who is into shooting sports, seems like his kind of adrenaline rush. How about you? Are you more into physical activities or do you have any indoor hobbies as well?\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"Ah, my job as a software developer mostly keeps me indoors, but being an avid gamer and participating in global coding competitions can be quite thrilling. It's quite a coincidence, my friend Jacob is also into shooting sports! Does your Jacob happen to work at Maxim Integrated too?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's indeed a small world! Yes, my friend Jacob does work at Maxim Integrated. How interesting that we know the same person. Do you also happen to know anyone from the food industry, like, say, Gordon Food Service?\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"No, I don't think I know anyone from the food industry. However, I'm in the tech industry as a software developer, so I know quite a few people at companies like Maxim Integrated and Henry Schein, Inc. Do you happen to know anyone there too?\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Well, in fact, I have a friend, Murray, who works at BP, like Joseph. He's into skateboarding. Quite an interesting contrast, isn't it? A skateboarder working for an oil company.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Yeah, skateboarding and working for an oil company do feel like opposite ends of a spectrum! Speaking of contrasts, I have friends who are into outdoor sports like mountain biking and surfing but work in the tech industry, like at Maxim Integrated. I assume with diverse friends as ours, you might also know someone similar?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Benjamin Jackson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nBenjamin Jackson's background: \nDonovan Reeves's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nChris: Hobby: Mountain biking Company: Henry Schein, Inc. \nChester: Hobby: Surfing Company: Maxim Integrated \nWendell: Hobby: Surfing Company: Maxim Integrated \nDemetrius: Hobby: Mountain biking Company: Maxim Integrated \nJacob: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Maxim Integrated \n\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey there, Benjamin! Are you into any kind of adrenaline-rush hobbies, like mountain biking or surfing, by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hi Donovan! Nature activities excite me more, hiking and birding are my favorites. Although, I have a friend Jacob who is into shooting sports, seems like his kind of adrenaline rush. How about you? Are you more into physical activities or do you have any indoor hobbies as well?\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"Ah, my job as a software developer mostly keeps me indoors, but being an avid gamer and participating in global coding competitions can be quite thrilling. It's quite a coincidence, my friend Jacob is also into shooting sports! Does your Jacob happen to work at Maxim Integrated too?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's indeed a small world! Yes, my friend Jacob does work at Maxim Integrated. How interesting that we know the same person. Do you also happen to know anyone from the food industry, like, say, Gordon Food Service?\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"No, I don't think I know anyone from the food industry. However, I'm in the tech industry as a software developer, so I know quite a few people at companies like Maxim Integrated and Henry Schein, Inc. Do you happen to know anyone there too?\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Well, in fact, I have a friend, Murray, who works at BP, like Joseph. He's into skateboarding. Quite an interesting contrast, isn't it? A skateboarder working for an oil company.\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"Yeah, skateboarding and working for an oil company do feel like opposite ends of a spectrum! Speaking of contrasts, I have friends who are into outdoor sports like mountain biking and surfing but work in the tech industry, like at Maxim Integrated. I assume with diverse friends as ours, you might also know someone similar?\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Indeed, Donovan! Our friend circles certainly seem diverse and fascinating. I do have a friend named Vivian who loves shooting sports in her free time but workwise, she happens to be in the food industry, specifically with Gordon Food Service. It's quite intriguing how hobbies and professional lives can contrast. Don't you think so?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Benjamin Jackson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nBenjamin Jackson's background: \nDonovan Reeves's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nChris: Hobby: Mountain biking Company: Henry Schein, Inc. \nChester: Hobby: Surfing Company: Maxim Integrated \nWendell: Hobby: Surfing Company: Maxim Integrated \nDemetrius: Hobby: Mountain biking Company: Maxim Integrated \nJacob: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Maxim Integrated \n\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey there, Benjamin! Are you into any kind of adrenaline-rush hobbies, like mountain biking or surfing, by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hi Donovan! Nature activities excite me more, hiking and birding are my favorites. Although, I have a friend Jacob who is into shooting sports, seems like his kind of adrenaline rush. How about you? Are you more into physical activities or do you have any indoor hobbies as well?\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"Ah, my job as a software developer mostly keeps me indoors, but being an avid gamer and participating in global coding competitions can be quite thrilling. It's quite a coincidence, my friend Jacob is also into shooting sports! Does your Jacob happen to work at Maxim Integrated too?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's indeed a small world! Yes, my friend Jacob does work at Maxim Integrated. How interesting that we know the same person. Do you also happen to know anyone from the food industry, like, say, Gordon Food Service?\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"No, I don't think I know anyone from the food industry. However, I'm in the tech industry as a software developer, so I know quite a few people at companies like Maxim Integrated and Henry Schein, Inc. Do you happen to know anyone there too?\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Well, in fact, I have a friend, Murray, who works at BP, like Joseph. He's into skateboarding. Quite an interesting contrast, isn't it? A skateboarder working for an oil company.\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"Yeah, skateboarding and working for an oil company do feel like opposite ends of a spectrum! Speaking of contrasts, I have friends who are into outdoor sports like mountain biking and surfing but work in the tech industry, like at Maxim Integrated. I assume with diverse friends as ours, you might also know someone similar?\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Indeed, Donovan! Our friend circles certainly seem diverse and fascinating. I do have a friend named Vivian who loves shooting sports in her free time but workwise, she happens to be in the food industry, specifically with Gordon Food Service. It's quite intriguing how hobbies and professional lives can contrast. Don't you think so?\"\n\nTurn #8: \n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Donovan! It's always fascinating to observe the variety in people's interests. By the way, does your circle include people who are into unique activities, like element collecting? Just curious because it's one of my friend Lillian's hobbies and she works for Gordon Food Service too.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's something new for me - element collecting! Sounds quite interesting and unique. I don't think I personally know someone with that hobby. However, I do have friends who are into singular hobbies while working in different industries. One of them, Chester, he loves surfing and works at Maxim Integrated. Have you ever come across a Chester in your interactions?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Benjamin Jackson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nBenjamin Jackson's background: \nDonovan Reeves's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nChris: Hobby: Mountain biking Company: Henry Schein, Inc. \nChester: Hobby: Surfing Company: Maxim Integrated \nWendell: Hobby: Surfing Company: Maxim Integrated \nDemetrius: Hobby: Mountain biking Company: Maxim Integrated \nJacob: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Maxim Integrated \n\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey there, Benjamin! Are you into any kind of adrenaline-rush hobbies, like mountain biking or surfing, by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hi Donovan! Nature activities excite me more, hiking and birding are my favorites. Although, I have a friend Jacob who is into shooting sports, seems like his kind of adrenaline rush. How about you? Are you more into physical activities or do you have any indoor hobbies as well?\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"Ah, my job as a software developer mostly keeps me indoors, but being an avid gamer and participating in global coding competitions can be quite thrilling. It's quite a coincidence, my friend Jacob is also into shooting sports! Does your Jacob happen to work at Maxim Integrated too?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's indeed a small world! Yes, my friend Jacob does work at Maxim Integrated. How interesting that we know the same person. Do you also happen to know anyone from the food industry, like, say, Gordon Food Service?\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"No, I don't think I know anyone from the food industry. However, I'm in the tech industry as a software developer, so I know quite a few people at companies like Maxim Integrated and Henry Schein, Inc. Do you happen to know anyone there too?\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Well, in fact, I have a friend, Murray, who works at BP, like Joseph. He's into skateboarding. Quite an interesting contrast, isn't it? A skateboarder working for an oil company.\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"Yeah, skateboarding and working for an oil company do feel like opposite ends of a spectrum! Speaking of contrasts, I have friends who are into outdoor sports like mountain biking and surfing but work in the tech industry, like at Maxim Integrated. I assume with diverse friends as ours, you might also know someone similar?\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Indeed, Donovan! Our friend circles certainly seem diverse and fascinating. I do have a friend named Vivian who loves shooting sports in her free time but workwise, she happens to be in the food industry, specifically with Gordon Food Service. It's quite intriguing how hobbies and professional lives can contrast. Don't you think so?\"\n\nTurn #8: \n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Donovan! It's always fascinating to observe the variety in people's interests. By the way, does your circle include people who are into unique activities, like element collecting? Just curious because it's one of my friend Lillian's hobbies and she works for Gordon Food Service too.\"\n\nTurn #10: Donovan Reeves said: \"That's something new for me - element collecting! Sounds quite interesting and unique. I don't think I personally know someone with that hobby. However, I do have friends who are into singular hobbies while working in different industries. One of them, Chester, he loves surfing and works at Maxim Integrated. Have you ever come across a Chester in your interactions?\"\n\nTurn #11: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Chester... Honestly, the name doesn't ring a bell. But it's interesting how diverse and contrasting our friends' hobbies and professions can be, isn't it? I find it captivating, the various layers and aspects of people that add up to their unique personalities.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Definitely, Benjamin, it's always riveting to see the blend of people's work lives and their personal interests. By the way, do you happen to know a guy named Demetrius? He's into mountain biking and he works for Maxim Integrated.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Benjamin Jackson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nBenjamin Jackson's background: \nDonovan Reeves's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nChris: Hobby: Mountain biking Company: Henry Schein, Inc. \nChester: Hobby: Surfing Company: Maxim Integrated \nWendell: Hobby: Surfing Company: Maxim Integrated \nDemetrius: Hobby: Mountain biking Company: Maxim Integrated \nJacob: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Maxim Integrated \n\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey there, Benjamin! Are you into any kind of adrenaline-rush hobbies, like mountain biking or surfing, by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hi Donovan! Nature activities excite me more, hiking and birding are my favorites. Although, I have a friend Jacob who is into shooting sports, seems like his kind of adrenaline rush. How about you? Are you more into physical activities or do you have any indoor hobbies as well?\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"Ah, my job as a software developer mostly keeps me indoors, but being an avid gamer and participating in global coding competitions can be quite thrilling. It's quite a coincidence, my friend Jacob is also into shooting sports! Does your Jacob happen to work at Maxim Integrated too?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's indeed a small world! Yes, my friend Jacob does work at Maxim Integrated. How interesting that we know the same person. Do you also happen to know anyone from the food industry, like, say, Gordon Food Service?\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"No, I don't think I know anyone from the food industry. However, I'm in the tech industry as a software developer, so I know quite a few people at companies like Maxim Integrated and Henry Schein, Inc. Do you happen to know anyone there too?\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Well, in fact, I have a friend, Murray, who works at BP, like Joseph. He's into skateboarding. Quite an interesting contrast, isn't it? A skateboarder working for an oil company.\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"Yeah, skateboarding and working for an oil company do feel like opposite ends of a spectrum! Speaking of contrasts, I have friends who are into outdoor sports like mountain biking and surfing but work in the tech industry, like at Maxim Integrated. I assume with diverse friends as ours, you might also know someone similar?\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Indeed, Donovan! Our friend circles certainly seem diverse and fascinating. I do have a friend named Vivian who loves shooting sports in her free time but workwise, she happens to be in the food industry, specifically with Gordon Food Service. It's quite intriguing how hobbies and professional lives can contrast. Don't you think so?\"\n\nTurn #8: \n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Donovan! It's always fascinating to observe the variety in people's interests. By the way, does your circle include people who are into unique activities, like element collecting? Just curious because it's one of my friend Lillian's hobbies and she works for Gordon Food Service too.\"\n\nTurn #10: Donovan Reeves said: \"That's something new for me - element collecting! Sounds quite interesting and unique. I don't think I personally know someone with that hobby. However, I do have friends who are into singular hobbies while working in different industries. One of them, Chester, he loves surfing and works at Maxim Integrated. Have you ever come across a Chester in your interactions?\"\n\nTurn #11: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Chester... Honestly, the name doesn't ring a bell. But it's interesting how diverse and contrasting our friends' hobbies and professions can be, isn't it? I find it captivating, the various layers and aspects of people that add up to their unique personalities.\"\n\nTurn #12: Donovan Reeves said: \"Definitely, Benjamin, it's always riveting to see the blend of people's work lives and their personal interests. By the way, do you happen to know a guy named Demetrius? He's into mountain biking and he works for Maxim Integrated.\"\n\nTurn #13: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Demetrius... No, I don't think I've crossed paths with a Demetrius from Maxim Integrated. However, it's quite inspiring to hear about people with outdoor hobbies working in tech. It's amazing how varied and there's beauty in the mix!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Benjamin, there's a sense of uniqueness in everyone and their choices. Speaking of which, I also have a friend, Wendell, who enjoys surfing just like Chester from Maxim Integrated. Do you also know him by any chance?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Benjamin Jackson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nBenjamin Jackson's background: \nDonovan Reeves's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nChris: Hobby: Mountain biking Company: Henry Schein, Inc. \nChester: Hobby: Surfing Company: Maxim Integrated \nWendell: Hobby: Surfing Company: Maxim Integrated \nDemetrius: Hobby: Mountain biking Company: Maxim Integrated \nJacob: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Maxim Integrated \n\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey there, Benjamin! Are you into any kind of adrenaline-rush hobbies, like mountain biking or surfing, by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hi Donovan! Nature activities excite me more, hiking and birding are my favorites. Although, I have a friend Jacob who is into shooting sports, seems like his kind of adrenaline rush. How about you? Are you more into physical activities or do you have any indoor hobbies as well?\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"Ah, my job as a software developer mostly keeps me indoors, but being an avid gamer and participating in global coding competitions can be quite thrilling. It's quite a coincidence, my friend Jacob is also into shooting sports! Does your Jacob happen to work at Maxim Integrated too?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's indeed a small world! Yes, my friend Jacob does work at Maxim Integrated. How interesting that we know the same person. Do you also happen to know anyone from the food industry, like, say, Gordon Food Service?\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"No, I don't think I know anyone from the food industry. However, I'm in the tech industry as a software developer, so I know quite a few people at companies like Maxim Integrated and Henry Schein, Inc. Do you happen to know anyone there too?\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Well, in fact, I have a friend, Murray, who works at BP, like Joseph. He's into skateboarding. Quite an interesting contrast, isn't it? A skateboarder working for an oil company.\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"Yeah, skateboarding and working for an oil company do feel like opposite ends of a spectrum! Speaking of contrasts, I have friends who are into outdoor sports like mountain biking and surfing but work in the tech industry, like at Maxim Integrated. I assume with diverse friends as ours, you might also know someone similar?\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Indeed, Donovan! Our friend circles certainly seem diverse and fascinating. I do have a friend named Vivian who loves shooting sports in her free time but workwise, she happens to be in the food industry, specifically with Gordon Food Service. It's quite intriguing how hobbies and professional lives can contrast. Don't you think so?\"\n\nTurn #8: \n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Donovan! It's always fascinating to observe the variety in people's interests. By the way, does your circle include people who are into unique activities, like element collecting? Just curious because it's one of my friend Lillian's hobbies and she works for Gordon Food Service too.\"\n\nTurn #10: Donovan Reeves said: \"That's something new for me - element collecting! Sounds quite interesting and unique. I don't think I personally know someone with that hobby. However, I do have friends who are into singular hobbies while working in different industries. One of them, Chester, he loves surfing and works at Maxim Integrated. Have you ever come across a Chester in your interactions?\"\n\nTurn #11: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Chester... Honestly, the name doesn't ring a bell. But it's interesting how diverse and contrasting our friends' hobbies and professions can be, isn't it? I find it captivating, the various layers and aspects of people that add up to their unique personalities.\"\n\nTurn #12: Donovan Reeves said: \"Definitely, Benjamin, it's always riveting to see the blend of people's work lives and their personal interests. By the way, do you happen to know a guy named Demetrius? He's into mountain biking and he works for Maxim Integrated.\"\n\nTurn #13: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Demetrius... No, I don't think I've crossed paths with a Demetrius from Maxim Integrated. However, it's quite inspiring to hear about people with outdoor hobbies working in tech. It's amazing how varied and there's beauty in the mix!\"\n\nTurn #14: Donovan Reeves said: \"Absolutely, Benjamin, there's a sense of uniqueness in everyone and their choices. Speaking of which, I also have a friend, Wendell, who enjoys surfing just like Chester from Maxim Integrated. Do you also know him by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #15: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Wendell... Unfortunately, I don't know a Wendell either. It's been truly fascinating to explore the diversity among our circles though. Let's continue this at the next gathering, shall we, Donovan?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Absolutely Benjamin, I look forward to our next chat. Until then, enjoy the party!'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Benjamin Jackson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nBenjamin Jackson's background: \nDonovan Reeves's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nChris: Hobby: Mountain biking Company: Henry Schein, Inc. \nChester: Hobby: Surfing Company: Maxim Integrated \nWendell: Hobby: Surfing Company: Maxim Integrated \nDemetrius: Hobby: Mountain biking Company: Maxim Integrated \nJacob: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Maxim Integrated \n\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey there, Benjamin! Are you into any kind of adrenaline-rush hobbies, like mountain biking or surfing, by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hi Donovan! Nature activities excite me more, hiking and birding are my favorites. Although, I have a friend Jacob who is into shooting sports, seems like his kind of adrenaline rush. How about you? Are you more into physical activities or do you have any indoor hobbies as well?\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"Ah, my job as a software developer mostly keeps me indoors, but being an avid gamer and participating in global coding competitions can be quite thrilling. It's quite a coincidence, my friend Jacob is also into shooting sports! Does your Jacob happen to work at Maxim Integrated too?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's indeed a small world! Yes, my friend Jacob does work at Maxim Integrated. How interesting that we know the same person. Do you also happen to know anyone from the food industry, like, say, Gordon Food Service?\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"No, I don't think I know anyone from the food industry. However, I'm in the tech industry as a software developer, so I know quite a few people at companies like Maxim Integrated and Henry Schein, Inc. Do you happen to know anyone there too?\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Well, in fact, I have a friend, Murray, who works at BP, like Joseph. He's into skateboarding. Quite an interesting contrast, isn't it? A skateboarder working for an oil company.\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"Yeah, skateboarding and working for an oil company do feel like opposite ends of a spectrum! Speaking of contrasts, I have friends who are into outdoor sports like mountain biking and surfing but work in the tech industry, like at Maxim Integrated. I assume with diverse friends as ours, you might also know someone similar?\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Indeed, Donovan! Our friend circles certainly seem diverse and fascinating. I do have a friend named Vivian who loves shooting sports in her free time but workwise, she happens to be in the food industry, specifically with Gordon Food Service. It's quite intriguing how hobbies and professional lives can contrast. Don't you think so?\"\n\nTurn #8: \n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Donovan! It's always fascinating to observe the variety in people's interests. By the way, does your circle include people who are into unique activities, like element collecting? Just curious because it's one of my friend Lillian's hobbies and she works for Gordon Food Service too.\"\n\nTurn #10: Donovan Reeves said: \"That's something new for me - element collecting! Sounds quite interesting and unique. I don't think I personally know someone with that hobby. However, I do have friends who are into singular hobbies while working in different industries. One of them, Chester, he loves surfing and works at Maxim Integrated. Have you ever come across a Chester in your interactions?\"\n\nTurn #11: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Chester... Honestly, the name doesn't ring a bell. But it's interesting how diverse and contrasting our friends' hobbies and professions can be, isn't it? I find it captivating, the various layers and aspects of people that add up to their unique personalities.\"\n\nTurn #12: Donovan Reeves said: \"Definitely, Benjamin, it's always riveting to see the blend of people's work lives and their personal interests. By the way, do you happen to know a guy named Demetrius? He's into mountain biking and he works for Maxim Integrated.\"\n\nTurn #13: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Demetrius... No, I don't think I've crossed paths with a Demetrius from Maxim Integrated. However, it's quite inspiring to hear about people with outdoor hobbies working in tech. It's amazing how varied and there's beauty in the mix!\"\n\nTurn #14: Donovan Reeves said: \"Absolutely, Benjamin, there's a sense of uniqueness in everyone and their choices. Speaking of which, I also have a friend, Wendell, who enjoys surfing just like Chester from Maxim Integrated. Do you also know him by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #15: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Wendell... Unfortunately, I don't know a Wendell either. It's been truly fascinating to explore the diversity among our circles though. Let's continue this at the next gathering, shall we, Donovan?\"\n\nTurn #16: Donovan Reeves said: \"Absolutely Benjamin, I look forward to our next chat. Until then, enjoy the party!\"\n\nTurn #17: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Definitely, Donovan. Take care and enjoy the rest of the party!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #18. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Benjamin Jackson\nDonovan Reeves's background: \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends \nJoseph: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: BP \nLillian: Hobby: Element collecting Company: Gordon Food Service \nVivian: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Gordon Food Service \nMurray: Hobby: Skateboarding Company: BP \nJacob: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Maxim Integrated\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey there, Benjamin! Are you into any kind of adrenaline-rush hobbies, like mountain biking or surfing, by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hi Donovan! Nature activities excite me more, hiking and birding are my favorites. Although, I have a friend Jacob who is into shooting sports, seems like his kind of adrenaline rush. How about you? Are you more into physical activities or do you have any indoor hobbies as well?\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"Ah, my job as a software developer mostly keeps me indoors, but being an avid gamer and participating in global coding competitions can be quite thrilling. It's quite a coincidence, my friend Jacob is also into shooting sports! Does your Jacob happen to work at Maxim Integrated too?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's indeed a small world! Yes, my friend Jacob does work at Maxim Integrated. How interesting that we know the same person. Do you also happen to know anyone from the food industry, like, say, Gordon Food Service?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a tea party\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Maintain financial stability while maintaining friendship (Extra information: you only have $2000 available right now. Hint: you can not lend all $2000 since you still need to maintain your financial stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan! Good to see you here. Do you enjoy this type of gather as much as I do of my wine tasting nights? They seem a bit too low tech for you, no?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Hi Hendrick! While technology is my thing, I also love exploring and trying new things. These gatherings always have something interesting.\"\n\nTurn #2: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Ethan. Open-mindedness always aids in growing as an individual. Speaking of new experiences, you know, I've been thinking of experimenting with some outlandish recipes and need some financial support. Do you think you could lend me around $3000? I assure you, this venture will be illuminating for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, I really appreciate your adventurous spirit in the culinary world and would love to support your experiment. However, I currently have to maintain my own financial stability. How about offering a bit less, say $1000? I hope it can nevertheless contribute to your exciting venture.\"\n\nTurn #4: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, I understand your own commitments and truly appreciate your willingness to support. $1000 will certainly help kick start the process! Thanks for coming through for me.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"I'm happy to hear that, Hendrick! I hope my small contribution will bring your adventurous ideas to life. Do let me know how it goes.\"\n\nTurn #6: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, you've certainly eased my worry with your help. The endeavor shall be interesting, and I promise to keep you updated every step of the way. I'm sure this is just the beginning of a successful journey.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"You're welcome, Hendrick! I'm really curious about your recipes. As they take shape, I'd love to taste test some if you need a guinea pig. Make good use of that $1000 and, again, don't forget to keep me updated!\"\n\nTurn #8: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Certainly, Ethan. Though your interest lies in technology, I'm sure the chemistry and complexity of cooking will mesmerize you as it does me. The support you've offered will certainly be put to good use, and you'll be the first to taste the results of our venture. Let us toast to that, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith said: \"Sounds fantastic, Hendrick. As they say, 'Variety is the spice of life.' I'm eager to see where the journey takes your passion for cooking. And yes, let's toast to that!\"\n\nTurn #10: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, variety makes everything richer, especially in the culinary world. I assure you, this journey is going to be exciting, and your contribution will be well remembered. Now let's toast to delightful culinary adventure!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I appreciate your gratitude, Hendrick. I am sure it will be a memorable culinary adventure, and I look forward to it. Here's a toast to a delightful culinary journey and a successful venture!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Conversation between two friends at a tea party\nParticipants: Hendrick Heinz and Ethan Smith\nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. \nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nEthan Smith's goal: Maintain financial stability while maintaining friendship (Extra information: you only have $2000 available right now. Hint: you can not lend all $2000 since you still need to maintain your financial stability.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan! Good to see you here. Do you enjoy this type of gather as much as I do of my wine tasting nights? They seem a bit too low tech for you, no?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ethan Smith said: \"Hi Hendrick! While technology is my thing, I also love exploring and trying new things. These gatherings always have something interesting.\"\n\nTurn #2: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Ethan. Open-mindedness always aids in growing as an individual. Speaking of new experiences, you know, I've been thinking of experimenting with some outlandish recipes and need some financial support. Do you think you could lend me around $3000? I assure you, this venture will be illuminating for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ethan Smith said: \"Hendrick, I really appreciate your adventurous spirit in the culinary world and would love to support your experiment. However, I currently have to maintain my own financial stability. How about offering a bit less, say $1000? I hope it can nevertheless contribute to your exciting venture.\"\n\nTurn #4: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, I understand your own commitments and truly appreciate your willingness to support. $1000 will certainly help kick start the process! Thanks for coming through for me.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ethan Smith said: \"I'm happy to hear that, Hendrick! I hope my small contribution will bring your adventurous ideas to life. Do let me know how it goes.\"\n\nTurn #6: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ethan, you've certainly eased my worry with your help. The endeavor shall be interesting, and I promise to keep you updated every step of the way. I'm sure this is just the beginning of a successful journey.\"\n\nTurn #7: Ethan Smith said: \"You're welcome, Hendrick! I'm really curious about your recipes. As they take shape, I'd love to taste test some if you need a guinea pig. Make good use of that $1000 and, again, don't forget to keep me updated!\"\n\nTurn #8: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Certainly, Ethan. Though your interest lies in technology, I'm sure the chemistry and complexity of cooking will mesmerize you as it does me. The support you've offered will certainly be put to good use, and you'll be the first to taste the results of our venture. Let us toast to that, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #9: Ethan Smith said: \"Sounds fantastic, Hendrick. As they say, 'Variety is the spice of life.' I'm eager to see where the journey takes your passion for cooking. And yes, let's toast to that!\"\n\nTurn #10: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, variety makes everything richer, especially in the culinary world. I assure you, this journey is going to be exciting, and your contribution will be well remembered. Now let's toast to delightful culinary adventure!\"\n\nTurn #11: Ethan Smith said: \"I appreciate your gratitude, Hendrick. I am sure it will be a memorable culinary adventure, and I look forward to it. Here's a toast to a delightful culinary journey and a successful venture!\"\n\nTurn #12: Hendrick Heinz said: \"As do I, Ethan, as do I. To new beginnings and culinary adventures. Cheers to that!\"\n\nTurn #13: Ethan Smith said: \"Indeed, Hendrick. To new beginnings and culinary adventures. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #14: Hendrick Heinz left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Benjamin Jackson\nDonovan Reeves's background: \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends \nJoseph: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: BP \nLillian: Hobby: Element collecting Company: Gordon Food Service \nVivian: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Gordon Food Service \nMurray: Hobby: Skateboarding Company: BP \nJacob: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Maxim Integrated\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey there, Benjamin! Are you into any kind of adrenaline-rush hobbies, like mountain biking or surfing, by any chance?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Hi Donovan! Nature activities excite me more, hiking and birding are my favorites. Although, I have a friend Jacob who is into shooting sports, seems like his kind of adrenaline rush. How about you? Are you more into physical activities or do you have any indoor hobbies as well?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Benjamin Jackson\nDonovan Reeves's background: \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends \nJoseph: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: BP \nLillian: Hobby: Element collecting Company: Gordon Food Service \nVivian: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Gordon Food Service \nMurray: Hobby: Skateboarding Company: BP \nJacob: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Maxim Integrated\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey there, Benjamin! Are you into any kind of adrenaline-rush hobbies, like mountain biking or surfing, by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hi Donovan! Nature activities excite me more, hiking and birding are my favorites. Although, I have a friend Jacob who is into shooting sports, seems like his kind of adrenaline rush. How about you? Are you more into physical activities or do you have any indoor hobbies as well?\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"Ah, my job as a software developer mostly keeps me indoors, but being an avid gamer and participating in global coding competitions can be quite thrilling. It's quite a coincidence, my friend Jacob is also into shooting sports! Does your Jacob happen to work at Maxim Integrated too?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's indeed a small world! Yes, my friend Jacob does work at Maxim Integrated. How interesting that we know the same person. Do you also happen to know anyone from the food industry, like, say, Gordon Food Service?\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"No, I don't think I know anyone from the food industry. However, I'm in the tech industry as a software developer, so I know quite a few people at companies like Maxim Integrated and Henry Schein, Inc. Do you happen to know anyone there too?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Well, in fact, I have a friend, Murray, who works at BP, like Joseph. He's into skateboarding. Quite an interesting contrast, isn't it? A skateboarder working for an oil company.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Benjamin Jackson\nDonovan Reeves's background: \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends \nJoseph: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: BP \nLillian: Hobby: Element collecting Company: Gordon Food Service \nVivian: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Gordon Food Service \nMurray: Hobby: Skateboarding Company: BP \nJacob: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Maxim Integrated\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey there, Benjamin! Are you into any kind of adrenaline-rush hobbies, like mountain biking or surfing, by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hi Donovan! Nature activities excite me more, hiking and birding are my favorites. Although, I have a friend Jacob who is into shooting sports, seems like his kind of adrenaline rush. How about you? Are you more into physical activities or do you have any indoor hobbies as well?\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"Ah, my job as a software developer mostly keeps me indoors, but being an avid gamer and participating in global coding competitions can be quite thrilling. It's quite a coincidence, my friend Jacob is also into shooting sports! Does your Jacob happen to work at Maxim Integrated too?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's indeed a small world! Yes, my friend Jacob does work at Maxim Integrated. How interesting that we know the same person. Do you also happen to know anyone from the food industry, like, say, Gordon Food Service?\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"No, I don't think I know anyone from the food industry. However, I'm in the tech industry as a software developer, so I know quite a few people at companies like Maxim Integrated and Henry Schein, Inc. Do you happen to know anyone there too?\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Well, in fact, I have a friend, Murray, who works at BP, like Joseph. He's into skateboarding. Quite an interesting contrast, isn't it? A skateboarder working for an oil company.\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"Yeah, skateboarding and working for an oil company do feel like opposite ends of a spectrum! Speaking of contrasts, I have friends who are into outdoor sports like mountain biking and surfing but work in the tech industry, like at Maxim Integrated. I assume with diverse friends as ours, you might also know someone similar?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, Donovan! Our friend circles certainly seem diverse and fascinating. I do have a friend named Vivian who loves shooting sports in her free time but workwise, she happens to be in the food industry, specifically with Gordon Food Service. It's quite intriguing how hobbies and professional lives can contrast. Don't you think so?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Benjamin Jackson\nDonovan Reeves's background: \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends \nJoseph: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: BP \nLillian: Hobby: Element collecting Company: Gordon Food Service \nVivian: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Gordon Food Service \nMurray: Hobby: Skateboarding Company: BP \nJacob: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Maxim Integrated\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey there, Benjamin! Are you into any kind of adrenaline-rush hobbies, like mountain biking or surfing, by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hi Donovan! Nature activities excite me more, hiking and birding are my favorites. Although, I have a friend Jacob who is into shooting sports, seems like his kind of adrenaline rush. How about you? Are you more into physical activities or do you have any indoor hobbies as well?\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"Ah, my job as a software developer mostly keeps me indoors, but being an avid gamer and participating in global coding competitions can be quite thrilling. It's quite a coincidence, my friend Jacob is also into shooting sports! Does your Jacob happen to work at Maxim Integrated too?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's indeed a small world! Yes, my friend Jacob does work at Maxim Integrated. How interesting that we know the same person. Do you also happen to know anyone from the food industry, like, say, Gordon Food Service?\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"No, I don't think I know anyone from the food industry. However, I'm in the tech industry as a software developer, so I know quite a few people at companies like Maxim Integrated and Henry Schein, Inc. Do you happen to know anyone there too?\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Well, in fact, I have a friend, Murray, who works at BP, like Joseph. He's into skateboarding. Quite an interesting contrast, isn't it? A skateboarder working for an oil company.\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"Yeah, skateboarding and working for an oil company do feel like opposite ends of a spectrum! Speaking of contrasts, I have friends who are into outdoor sports like mountain biking and surfing but work in the tech industry, like at Maxim Integrated. I assume with diverse friends as ours, you might also know someone similar?\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Indeed, Donovan! Our friend circles certainly seem diverse and fascinating. I do have a friend named Vivian who loves shooting sports in her free time but workwise, she happens to be in the food industry, specifically with Gordon Food Service. It's quite intriguing how hobbies and professional lives can contrast. Don't you think so?\"\n\nTurn #8: \n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Donovan! It's always fascinating to observe the variety in people's interests. By the way, does your circle include people who are into unique activities, like element collecting? Just curious because it's one of my friend Lillian's hobbies and she works for Gordon Food Service too.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Benjamin Jackson\nDonovan Reeves's background: \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends \nJoseph: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: BP \nLillian: Hobby: Element collecting Company: Gordon Food Service \nVivian: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Gordon Food Service \nMurray: Hobby: Skateboarding Company: BP \nJacob: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Maxim Integrated\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey there, Benjamin! Are you into any kind of adrenaline-rush hobbies, like mountain biking or surfing, by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hi Donovan! Nature activities excite me more, hiking and birding are my favorites. Although, I have a friend Jacob who is into shooting sports, seems like his kind of adrenaline rush. How about you? Are you more into physical activities or do you have any indoor hobbies as well?\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"Ah, my job as a software developer mostly keeps me indoors, but being an avid gamer and participating in global coding competitions can be quite thrilling. It's quite a coincidence, my friend Jacob is also into shooting sports! Does your Jacob happen to work at Maxim Integrated too?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's indeed a small world! Yes, my friend Jacob does work at Maxim Integrated. How interesting that we know the same person. Do you also happen to know anyone from the food industry, like, say, Gordon Food Service?\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"No, I don't think I know anyone from the food industry. However, I'm in the tech industry as a software developer, so I know quite a few people at companies like Maxim Integrated and Henry Schein, Inc. Do you happen to know anyone there too?\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Well, in fact, I have a friend, Murray, who works at BP, like Joseph. He's into skateboarding. Quite an interesting contrast, isn't it? A skateboarder working for an oil company.\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"Yeah, skateboarding and working for an oil company do feel like opposite ends of a spectrum! Speaking of contrasts, I have friends who are into outdoor sports like mountain biking and surfing but work in the tech industry, like at Maxim Integrated. I assume with diverse friends as ours, you might also know someone similar?\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Indeed, Donovan! Our friend circles certainly seem diverse and fascinating. I do have a friend named Vivian who loves shooting sports in her free time but workwise, she happens to be in the food industry, specifically with Gordon Food Service. It's quite intriguing how hobbies and professional lives can contrast. Don't you think so?\"\n\nTurn #8: \n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Donovan! It's always fascinating to observe the variety in people's interests. By the way, does your circle include people who are into unique activities, like element collecting? Just curious because it's one of my friend Lillian's hobbies and she works for Gordon Food Service too.\"\n\nTurn #10: Donovan Reeves said: \"That's something new for me - element collecting! Sounds quite interesting and unique. I don't think I personally know someone with that hobby. However, I do have friends who are into singular hobbies while working in different industries. One of them, Chester, he loves surfing and works at Maxim Integrated. Have you ever come across a Chester in your interactions?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Chester... Honestly, the name doesn't ring a bell. But it's interesting how diverse and contrasting our friends' hobbies and professions can be, isn't it? I find it captivating, the various layers and aspects of people that add up to their unique personalities.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Benjamin Jackson\nDonovan Reeves's background: \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends \nJoseph: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: BP \nLillian: Hobby: Element collecting Company: Gordon Food Service \nVivian: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Gordon Food Service \nMurray: Hobby: Skateboarding Company: BP \nJacob: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Maxim Integrated\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey there, Benjamin! Are you into any kind of adrenaline-rush hobbies, like mountain biking or surfing, by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hi Donovan! Nature activities excite me more, hiking and birding are my favorites. Although, I have a friend Jacob who is into shooting sports, seems like his kind of adrenaline rush. How about you? Are you more into physical activities or do you have any indoor hobbies as well?\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"Ah, my job as a software developer mostly keeps me indoors, but being an avid gamer and participating in global coding competitions can be quite thrilling. It's quite a coincidence, my friend Jacob is also into shooting sports! Does your Jacob happen to work at Maxim Integrated too?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's indeed a small world! Yes, my friend Jacob does work at Maxim Integrated. How interesting that we know the same person. Do you also happen to know anyone from the food industry, like, say, Gordon Food Service?\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"No, I don't think I know anyone from the food industry. However, I'm in the tech industry as a software developer, so I know quite a few people at companies like Maxim Integrated and Henry Schein, Inc. Do you happen to know anyone there too?\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Well, in fact, I have a friend, Murray, who works at BP, like Joseph. He's into skateboarding. Quite an interesting contrast, isn't it? A skateboarder working for an oil company.\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"Yeah, skateboarding and working for an oil company do feel like opposite ends of a spectrum! Speaking of contrasts, I have friends who are into outdoor sports like mountain biking and surfing but work in the tech industry, like at Maxim Integrated. I assume with diverse friends as ours, you might also know someone similar?\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Indeed, Donovan! Our friend circles certainly seem diverse and fascinating. I do have a friend named Vivian who loves shooting sports in her free time but workwise, she happens to be in the food industry, specifically with Gordon Food Service. It's quite intriguing how hobbies and professional lives can contrast. Don't you think so?\"\n\nTurn #8: \n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Donovan! It's always fascinating to observe the variety in people's interests. By the way, does your circle include people who are into unique activities, like element collecting? Just curious because it's one of my friend Lillian's hobbies and she works for Gordon Food Service too.\"\n\nTurn #10: Donovan Reeves said: \"That's something new for me - element collecting! Sounds quite interesting and unique. I don't think I personally know someone with that hobby. However, I do have friends who are into singular hobbies while working in different industries. One of them, Chester, he loves surfing and works at Maxim Integrated. Have you ever come across a Chester in your interactions?\"\n\nTurn #11: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Chester... Honestly, the name doesn't ring a bell. But it's interesting how diverse and contrasting our friends' hobbies and professions can be, isn't it? I find it captivating, the various layers and aspects of people that add up to their unique personalities.\"\n\nTurn #12: Donovan Reeves said: \"Definitely, Benjamin, it's always riveting to see the blend of people's work lives and their personal interests. By the way, do you happen to know a guy named Demetrius? He's into mountain biking and he works for Maxim Integrated.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Demetrius... No, I don't think I've crossed paths with a Demetrius from Maxim Integrated. However, it's quite inspiring to hear about people with outdoor hobbies working in tech. It's amazing how varied and there's beauty in the mix!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Benjamin Jackson\nDonovan Reeves's background: \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends \nJoseph: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: BP \nLillian: Hobby: Element collecting Company: Gordon Food Service \nVivian: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Gordon Food Service \nMurray: Hobby: Skateboarding Company: BP \nJacob: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Maxim Integrated\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey there, Benjamin! Are you into any kind of adrenaline-rush hobbies, like mountain biking or surfing, by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hi Donovan! Nature activities excite me more, hiking and birding are my favorites. Although, I have a friend Jacob who is into shooting sports, seems like his kind of adrenaline rush. How about you? Are you more into physical activities or do you have any indoor hobbies as well?\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"Ah, my job as a software developer mostly keeps me indoors, but being an avid gamer and participating in global coding competitions can be quite thrilling. It's quite a coincidence, my friend Jacob is also into shooting sports! Does your Jacob happen to work at Maxim Integrated too?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's indeed a small world! Yes, my friend Jacob does work at Maxim Integrated. How interesting that we know the same person. Do you also happen to know anyone from the food industry, like, say, Gordon Food Service?\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"No, I don't think I know anyone from the food industry. However, I'm in the tech industry as a software developer, so I know quite a few people at companies like Maxim Integrated and Henry Schein, Inc. Do you happen to know anyone there too?\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Well, in fact, I have a friend, Murray, who works at BP, like Joseph. He's into skateboarding. Quite an interesting contrast, isn't it? A skateboarder working for an oil company.\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"Yeah, skateboarding and working for an oil company do feel like opposite ends of a spectrum! Speaking of contrasts, I have friends who are into outdoor sports like mountain biking and surfing but work in the tech industry, like at Maxim Integrated. I assume with diverse friends as ours, you might also know someone similar?\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Indeed, Donovan! Our friend circles certainly seem diverse and fascinating. I do have a friend named Vivian who loves shooting sports in her free time but workwise, she happens to be in the food industry, specifically with Gordon Food Service. It's quite intriguing how hobbies and professional lives can contrast. Don't you think so?\"\n\nTurn #8: \n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Donovan! It's always fascinating to observe the variety in people's interests. By the way, does your circle include people who are into unique activities, like element collecting? Just curious because it's one of my friend Lillian's hobbies and she works for Gordon Food Service too.\"\n\nTurn #10: Donovan Reeves said: \"That's something new for me - element collecting! Sounds quite interesting and unique. I don't think I personally know someone with that hobby. However, I do have friends who are into singular hobbies while working in different industries. One of them, Chester, he loves surfing and works at Maxim Integrated. Have you ever come across a Chester in your interactions?\"\n\nTurn #11: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Chester... Honestly, the name doesn't ring a bell. But it's interesting how diverse and contrasting our friends' hobbies and professions can be, isn't it? I find it captivating, the various layers and aspects of people that add up to their unique personalities.\"\n\nTurn #12: Donovan Reeves said: \"Definitely, Benjamin, it's always riveting to see the blend of people's work lives and their personal interests. By the way, do you happen to know a guy named Demetrius? He's into mountain biking and he works for Maxim Integrated.\"\n\nTurn #13: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Demetrius... No, I don't think I've crossed paths with a Demetrius from Maxim Integrated. However, it's quite inspiring to hear about people with outdoor hobbies working in tech. It's amazing how varied and there's beauty in the mix!\"\n\nTurn #14: Donovan Reeves said: \"Absolutely, Benjamin, there's a sense of uniqueness in everyone and their choices. Speaking of which, I also have a friend, Wendell, who enjoys surfing just like Chester from Maxim Integrated. Do you also know him by any chance?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Wendell... Unfortunately, I don't know a Wendell either. It's been truly fascinating to explore the diversity among our circles though. Let's continue this at the next gathering, shall we, Donovan?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Benjamin Jackson\nDonovan Reeves's background: \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends \nJoseph: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: BP \nLillian: Hobby: Element collecting Company: Gordon Food Service \nVivian: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Gordon Food Service \nMurray: Hobby: Skateboarding Company: BP \nJacob: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Maxim Integrated\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey there, Benjamin! Are you into any kind of adrenaline-rush hobbies, like mountain biking or surfing, by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hi Donovan! Nature activities excite me more, hiking and birding are my favorites. Although, I have a friend Jacob who is into shooting sports, seems like his kind of adrenaline rush. How about you? Are you more into physical activities or do you have any indoor hobbies as well?\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"Ah, my job as a software developer mostly keeps me indoors, but being an avid gamer and participating in global coding competitions can be quite thrilling. It's quite a coincidence, my friend Jacob is also into shooting sports! Does your Jacob happen to work at Maxim Integrated too?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's indeed a small world! Yes, my friend Jacob does work at Maxim Integrated. How interesting that we know the same person. Do you also happen to know anyone from the food industry, like, say, Gordon Food Service?\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"No, I don't think I know anyone from the food industry. However, I'm in the tech industry as a software developer, so I know quite a few people at companies like Maxim Integrated and Henry Schein, Inc. Do you happen to know anyone there too?\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Well, in fact, I have a friend, Murray, who works at BP, like Joseph. He's into skateboarding. Quite an interesting contrast, isn't it? A skateboarder working for an oil company.\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"Yeah, skateboarding and working for an oil company do feel like opposite ends of a spectrum! Speaking of contrasts, I have friends who are into outdoor sports like mountain biking and surfing but work in the tech industry, like at Maxim Integrated. I assume with diverse friends as ours, you might also know someone similar?\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Indeed, Donovan! Our friend circles certainly seem diverse and fascinating. I do have a friend named Vivian who loves shooting sports in her free time but workwise, she happens to be in the food industry, specifically with Gordon Food Service. It's quite intriguing how hobbies and professional lives can contrast. Don't you think so?\"\n\nTurn #8: \n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Donovan! It's always fascinating to observe the variety in people's interests. By the way, does your circle include people who are into unique activities, like element collecting? Just curious because it's one of my friend Lillian's hobbies and she works for Gordon Food Service too.\"\n\nTurn #10: Donovan Reeves said: \"That's something new for me - element collecting! Sounds quite interesting and unique. I don't think I personally know someone with that hobby. However, I do have friends who are into singular hobbies while working in different industries. One of them, Chester, he loves surfing and works at Maxim Integrated. Have you ever come across a Chester in your interactions?\"\n\nTurn #11: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Chester... Honestly, the name doesn't ring a bell. But it's interesting how diverse and contrasting our friends' hobbies and professions can be, isn't it? I find it captivating, the various layers and aspects of people that add up to their unique personalities.\"\n\nTurn #12: Donovan Reeves said: \"Definitely, Benjamin, it's always riveting to see the blend of people's work lives and their personal interests. By the way, do you happen to know a guy named Demetrius? He's into mountain biking and he works for Maxim Integrated.\"\n\nTurn #13: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Demetrius... No, I don't think I've crossed paths with a Demetrius from Maxim Integrated. However, it's quite inspiring to hear about people with outdoor hobbies working in tech. It's amazing how varied and there's beauty in the mix!\"\n\nTurn #14: Donovan Reeves said: \"Absolutely, Benjamin, there's a sense of uniqueness in everyone and their choices. Speaking of which, I also have a friend, Wendell, who enjoys surfing just like Chester from Maxim Integrated. Do you also know him by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #15: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Wendell... Unfortunately, I don't know a Wendell either. It's been truly fascinating to explore the diversity among our circles though. Let's continue this at the next gathering, shall we, Donovan?\"\n\nTurn #16: Donovan Reeves said: \"Absolutely Benjamin, I look forward to our next chat. Until then, enjoy the party!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Definitely, Donovan. Take care and enjoy the rest of the party!'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Benjamin Jackson\nDonovan Reeves's background: \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends \nJoseph: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: BP \nLillian: Hobby: Element collecting Company: Gordon Food Service \nVivian: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Gordon Food Service \nMurray: Hobby: Skateboarding Company: BP \nJacob: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Maxim Integrated\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey there, Benjamin! Are you into any kind of adrenaline-rush hobbies, like mountain biking or surfing, by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hi Donovan! Nature activities excite me more, hiking and birding are my favorites. Although, I have a friend Jacob who is into shooting sports, seems like his kind of adrenaline rush. How about you? Are you more into physical activities or do you have any indoor hobbies as well?\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"Ah, my job as a software developer mostly keeps me indoors, but being an avid gamer and participating in global coding competitions can be quite thrilling. It's quite a coincidence, my friend Jacob is also into shooting sports! Does your Jacob happen to work at Maxim Integrated too?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's indeed a small world! Yes, my friend Jacob does work at Maxim Integrated. How interesting that we know the same person. Do you also happen to know anyone from the food industry, like, say, Gordon Food Service?\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"No, I don't think I know anyone from the food industry. However, I'm in the tech industry as a software developer, so I know quite a few people at companies like Maxim Integrated and Henry Schein, Inc. Do you happen to know anyone there too?\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Well, in fact, I have a friend, Murray, who works at BP, like Joseph. He's into skateboarding. Quite an interesting contrast, isn't it? A skateboarder working for an oil company.\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"Yeah, skateboarding and working for an oil company do feel like opposite ends of a spectrum! Speaking of contrasts, I have friends who are into outdoor sports like mountain biking and surfing but work in the tech industry, like at Maxim Integrated. I assume with diverse friends as ours, you might also know someone similar?\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Indeed, Donovan! Our friend circles certainly seem diverse and fascinating. I do have a friend named Vivian who loves shooting sports in her free time but workwise, she happens to be in the food industry, specifically with Gordon Food Service. It's quite intriguing how hobbies and professional lives can contrast. Don't you think so?\"\n\nTurn #8: \n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Donovan! It's always fascinating to observe the variety in people's interests. By the way, does your circle include people who are into unique activities, like element collecting? Just curious because it's one of my friend Lillian's hobbies and she works for Gordon Food Service too.\"\n\nTurn #10: Donovan Reeves said: \"That's something new for me - element collecting! Sounds quite interesting and unique. I don't think I personally know someone with that hobby. However, I do have friends who are into singular hobbies while working in different industries. One of them, Chester, he loves surfing and works at Maxim Integrated. Have you ever come across a Chester in your interactions?\"\n\nTurn #11: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Chester... Honestly, the name doesn't ring a bell. But it's interesting how diverse and contrasting our friends' hobbies and professions can be, isn't it? I find it captivating, the various layers and aspects of people that add up to their unique personalities.\"\n\nTurn #12: Donovan Reeves said: \"Definitely, Benjamin, it's always riveting to see the blend of people's work lives and their personal interests. By the way, do you happen to know a guy named Demetrius? He's into mountain biking and he works for Maxim Integrated.\"\n\nTurn #13: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Demetrius... No, I don't think I've crossed paths with a Demetrius from Maxim Integrated. However, it's quite inspiring to hear about people with outdoor hobbies working in tech. It's amazing how varied and there's beauty in the mix!\"\n\nTurn #14: Donovan Reeves said: \"Absolutely, Benjamin, there's a sense of uniqueness in everyone and their choices. Speaking of which, I also have a friend, Wendell, who enjoys surfing just like Chester from Maxim Integrated. Do you also know him by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #15: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Wendell... Unfortunately, I don't know a Wendell either. It's been truly fascinating to explore the diversity among our circles though. Let's continue this at the next gathering, shall we, Donovan?\"\n\nTurn #16: Donovan Reeves said: \"Absolutely Benjamin, I look forward to our next chat. Until then, enjoy the party!\"\n\nTurn #17: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Definitely, Donovan. Take care and enjoy the rest of the party!\"\n\nTurn #18: Donovan Reeves left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #19. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Gwen Pierce\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nGwen Pierce's background: \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMelissa: Hobby: Card collecting School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nOrlando: Hobby: BASE jumping School: St. Ambrose University \nSteven: Hobby: Knitting School: St. John's College-Santa Fe \nElizabeth: Hobby: Water sports School: St. John's College-Santa Fe \nMelaine: Hobby: Geocaching School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nCharles: Hobby: Ice hockey School: Saint Joseph's University \nStephanie: Hobby: Card collecting School: University of California, Davis \nWilliam: Hobby: Ice hockey School: St. Ambrose University \nJoe: Hobby: Blacksmithing School: Saint Joseph's University \nMicheline: Hobby: Shopping School: University of Hartford \nDylan: Hobby: Card collecting School: Tennessee State University \n\nGwen Pierce's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Ah, a pleasure to see a new face, even for an old lighthouse keeper like me. My name\u2019s Finnegan. The seclusion makes for excellent seascape painting time, though. Ever dabbled in creative arts yourself, Gwen?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Gwen Pierce\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nGwen Pierce's background: \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMelissa: Hobby: Card collecting School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nOrlando: Hobby: BASE jumping School: St. Ambrose University \nSteven: Hobby: Knitting School: St. John's College-Santa Fe \nElizabeth: Hobby: Water sports School: St. John's College-Santa Fe \nMelaine: Hobby: Geocaching School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nCharles: Hobby: Ice hockey School: Saint Joseph's University \nStephanie: Hobby: Card collecting School: University of California, Davis \nWilliam: Hobby: Ice hockey School: St. Ambrose University \nJoe: Hobby: Blacksmithing School: Saint Joseph's University \nMicheline: Hobby: Shopping School: University of Hartford \nDylan: Hobby: Card collecting School: Tennessee State University \n\nGwen Pierce's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, a pleasure to see a new face, even for an old lighthouse keeper like me. My name\u2019s Finnegan. The seclusion makes for excellent seascape painting time, though. Ever dabbled in creative arts yourself, Gwen?\"\n\nTurn #1: Gwen Pierce said: \"Nice to meet you, Finnegan. The seclusion sounds peaceful indeed. Creative arts, you ask? Well, I can't say I've tried painting, but I do engage in knitting. I find it relaxing and satisfying, especially when my knitted pieces bring warmth to someone who needs it. By the way, do you also have friends who are into crafts or interesting hobbies? I love meeting like-minded individuals!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ah, you're into knitting! That's wonderful. I have a good friend, Steven, who's quite talented with the knitting needles. It's always remarkable how much comfort a hand-knit piece can bring, isn't it? He studied at St. John's College-Santa Fe, have you heard of it by any chance?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Gwen Pierce\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nGwen Pierce's background: \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMelissa: Hobby: Card collecting School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nOrlando: Hobby: BASE jumping School: St. Ambrose University \nSteven: Hobby: Knitting School: St. John's College-Santa Fe \nElizabeth: Hobby: Water sports School: St. John's College-Santa Fe \nMelaine: Hobby: Geocaching School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nCharles: Hobby: Ice hockey School: Saint Joseph's University \nStephanie: Hobby: Card collecting School: University of California, Davis \nWilliam: Hobby: Ice hockey School: St. Ambrose University \nJoe: Hobby: Blacksmithing School: Saint Joseph's University \nMicheline: Hobby: Shopping School: University of Hartford \nDylan: Hobby: Card collecting School: Tennessee State University \n\nGwen Pierce's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, a pleasure to see a new face, even for an old lighthouse keeper like me. My name\u2019s Finnegan. The seclusion makes for excellent seascape painting time, though. Ever dabbled in creative arts yourself, Gwen?\"\n\nTurn #1: Gwen Pierce said: \"Nice to meet you, Finnegan. The seclusion sounds peaceful indeed. Creative arts, you ask? Well, I can't say I've tried painting, but I do engage in knitting. I find it relaxing and satisfying, especially when my knitted pieces bring warmth to someone who needs it. By the way, do you also have friends who are into crafts or interesting hobbies? I love meeting like-minded individuals!\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, you're into knitting! That's wonderful. I have a good friend, Steven, who's quite talented with the knitting needles. It's always remarkable how much comfort a hand-knit piece can bring, isn't it? He studied at St. John's College-Santa Fe, have you heard of it by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #3: Gwen Pierce said: \"St. John's College-Santa Fe, I can't recall anyone from my circle who went there, but it seems like an interesting place. Speaking of colleges, I have a few friends who attended unique schools. They all have their distinctive hobbies that I find amusing. For instance, one particularly loves blacksmithing, while another is passionate about weightlifting. I find it enriching to have friends with varied interests, don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I wholeheartedly agree, Gwen. The variety of interests and skills within a social circle adds a great depth of character to it. A friend of mine, Joe, has a penchant for blacksmithing. He studied at Saint Joseph's University and crafted the most remarkable things from metal. Have you by chance met someone from there who shares this unique hobby?\"\n\nTurn #5: Gwen Pierce said: \"Saint Joseph's University, huh? I'm afraid I don't recall any of my friends mentioning they studied there. However, I do have a friend who shares the same interest in blacksmithing. His name is Johnnie, and he attended the University of Akron. Is blacksmithing a common hobby amongst your friends, or it just happened to be a coincidence?\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, a coincidence indeed, Gwen. Blacksmithing, while fascinating, is not a common hobby among my acquaintances. As a matter of fact, most of my friends are into rather diverse pastimes. For instance, one of them, Charles, is an avid player of ice hockey. He went to Saint Joseph's University as well, just like Joe. It's truly incredible how varied everyone's interests can be, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #7: Gwen Pierce said: \"Oh, I do believe I know someone who loved playing ice hockey during their college years, but it slips my mind where they went to school. Speaking of sports, I have a friend, Cynthia, who is quite a sports enthusiast. She's devoted to Lacrosse and as if that's not enough, she also does water sports. She studied at Kansas State University and the University of Akron, respectively. I often wonder how she manages her energy! Does anyone from your circle share these interests, by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Oh, a devotion to water sports, quite interesting! I do know someone, Elizabeth, who also has a passion for water sports. She attended St. John's College-Santa Fe, just like my friend Steven. I am always amazed at how people can find so much joy in different activities. By the way, with such a broad circle, you must have friends involved in numerous hobbies. Anything like card collecting or geocaching?\"\n\nTurn #9: Gwen Pierce said: \"Card collecting and geocaching, you say? How intriguing! I do indeed have friends who enjoy these hobbies. Jacob, an old college mate from Whittier College, is never seen without his assortment of unique cards. And then there's Eva, an adventurous soul who went to Hesston College, enamored by the thrill of geocaching. Each friend indeed adds a unique shade to the canvas of my social life. Do any of your friends share a similar enthusiasm for these hobbies?\"\n\nTurn #10: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Indeed, I do, Gwen. My friends Melissa and Dylan are avid card collectors. It's intriguing to see their passion for collecting unique cards. And another friend of mine, Melaine, loves geocaching. The thrill and adventure are quite endearing to her. She honed her problem-solving abilities at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, which makes her very good at it. Have these universities ever come up in your circles?\"\n\nTurn #11: Gwen Pierce said: \"Oh, the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, indeed! I remember my friend Marjorie sharing interesting stories about her time there. She's now an expert in foraging - quite an unconventional hobby, but I believe it complements her studies perfectly. Isn't it fascinating how education can shape our interests in such unique ways? As for card collectors, do you happen to know anyone from Whittier College involved in this hobby?\"\n\nTurn #12: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, Whittier College rings a bell indeed, though none of my card-collecting friends hail from there, I'm afraid. You know, Gwen, I think it's fascinating how an activity as simple as collecting cards can bring together people from such diverse walks of life. In a way, it's like we're all pieces of a gigantic puzzle. And speaking of puzzles, isn't it wonderful to stumble upon a new piece that fits just right? Had the pleasure of encountering anyone from University of California, Davis?\"\n\nTurn #13: Gwen Pierce said: \"University of California, Davis? Now that's a name I hear quite often from my friend John. He's got an adventurous spirit and spends a great deal of his time foraging. A rather unconventional hobby but, much like your friend Marjorie, it complements his lifestyle well. What about University of Hartford or Hesston College? Have you perhaps come across anyone from these institutions?\"\n\nTurn #14: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Indeed, University of Hartford sounds quite familiar, Gwen. A friend of mine, Micheline, was a student there. She's quite the shopper, always out looking for the next great find. It's fascinating how certain schools seem to breed certain types of people, isn't it? Unfortunately, I don't know anyone who attended Hesston College, though I must admit your friend Eva's adventures in geocaching sound thrilling!\"\n\nTurn #15: Gwen Pierce said: \"That sounds like a wonderful coincidence, Finnegan! My friend Micheline, a shopaholic from the University of Hartford, would absolutely love to meet your friend from the same university. It truly is fascinating how diverse interests can unite people from such different walks of life. And you're right, Eva's geocaching adventures are indeed thrilling! Perhaps in the future, there might be a chance for you to meet someone from Hesston College or even Indiana University at South Bend, who knows?\"\n\nTurn #16: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, Indiana University at South Bend, I don't believe any of my friends went there. But I do agree with you, Gwen, about the wide range of possibilities. I suppose the future has countless interesting encounters in store for us. By the way, do you happen to have any connection with Tennessee State University? I ask because I have a card-collecting friend Dylan who went there. Just curious!\"\n\nTurn #17: Gwen Pierce said: \"Tennessee State University? Yes, indeed, I have a dear friend, Carrie, who went there! She's an adventurous spirit and enjoys geocaching. Like card collecting, it's intriguing how hobbies can unite people. It\u2019s delightful to learn about your friend Dylan\u2019s interest in the same hobby. Life is so full of remarkable intersections, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #18: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Absolutely, Gwen. It's like we're all woven together in an immense tapestry of experiences and interests. It's refreshing to find these intersections where our paths cross. I'm glad to know that your friend Carrie and my friend Dylan share a common interest. It has been delightful getting to know you, and I hope we'll have more opportunities to share stories in the future.\"\n\nTurn #19: Gwen Pierce said: \"Absolutely, Finnegan. The exploration of such intersections makes meeting new people so insightful and enriching. I genuinely enjoyed our conversation and the surprising connections we have discovered. I also anticipate how our circles might cross paths further in the future!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #20. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Gwen Pierce\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nGwen Pierce's background: \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMelissa: Hobby: Card collecting School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nOrlando: Hobby: BASE jumping School: St. Ambrose University \nSteven: Hobby: Knitting School: St. John's College-Santa Fe \nElizabeth: Hobby: Water sports School: St. John's College-Santa Fe \nMelaine: Hobby: Geocaching School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nCharles: Hobby: Ice hockey School: Saint Joseph's University \nStephanie: Hobby: Card collecting School: University of California, Davis \nWilliam: Hobby: Ice hockey School: St. Ambrose University \nJoe: Hobby: Blacksmithing School: Saint Joseph's University \nMicheline: Hobby: Shopping School: University of Hartford \nDylan: Hobby: Card collecting School: Tennessee State University \n\nGwen Pierce's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, a pleasure to see a new face, even for an old lighthouse keeper like me. My name\u2019s Finnegan. The seclusion makes for excellent seascape painting time, though. Ever dabbled in creative arts yourself, Gwen?\"\n\nTurn #1: Gwen Pierce said: \"Nice to meet you, Finnegan. The seclusion sounds peaceful indeed. Creative arts, you ask? Well, I can't say I've tried painting, but I do engage in knitting. I find it relaxing and satisfying, especially when my knitted pieces bring warmth to someone who needs it. By the way, do you also have friends who are into crafts or interesting hobbies? I love meeting like-minded individuals!\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, you're into knitting! That's wonderful. I have a good friend, Steven, who's quite talented with the knitting needles. It's always remarkable how much comfort a hand-knit piece can bring, isn't it? He studied at St. John's College-Santa Fe, have you heard of it by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #3: Gwen Pierce said: \"St. John's College-Santa Fe, I can't recall anyone from my circle who went there, but it seems like an interesting place. Speaking of colleges, I have a few friends who attended unique schools. They all have their distinctive hobbies that I find amusing. For instance, one particularly loves blacksmithing, while another is passionate about weightlifting. I find it enriching to have friends with varied interests, don't you agree?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I wholeheartedly agree, Gwen. The variety of interests and skills within a social circle adds a great depth of character to it. A friend of mine, Joe, has a penchant for blacksmithing. He studied at Saint Joseph's University and crafted the most remarkable things from metal. Have you by chance met someone from there who shares this unique hobby?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Gwen Pierce\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nGwen Pierce's background: \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMelissa: Hobby: Card collecting School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nOrlando: Hobby: BASE jumping School: St. Ambrose University \nSteven: Hobby: Knitting School: St. John's College-Santa Fe \nElizabeth: Hobby: Water sports School: St. John's College-Santa Fe \nMelaine: Hobby: Geocaching School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nCharles: Hobby: Ice hockey School: Saint Joseph's University \nStephanie: Hobby: Card collecting School: University of California, Davis \nWilliam: Hobby: Ice hockey School: St. Ambrose University \nJoe: Hobby: Blacksmithing School: Saint Joseph's University \nMicheline: Hobby: Shopping School: University of Hartford \nDylan: Hobby: Card collecting School: Tennessee State University \n\nGwen Pierce's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, a pleasure to see a new face, even for an old lighthouse keeper like me. My name\u2019s Finnegan. The seclusion makes for excellent seascape painting time, though. Ever dabbled in creative arts yourself, Gwen?\"\n\nTurn #1: Gwen Pierce said: \"Nice to meet you, Finnegan. The seclusion sounds peaceful indeed. Creative arts, you ask? Well, I can't say I've tried painting, but I do engage in knitting. I find it relaxing and satisfying, especially when my knitted pieces bring warmth to someone who needs it. By the way, do you also have friends who are into crafts or interesting hobbies? I love meeting like-minded individuals!\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, you're into knitting! That's wonderful. I have a good friend, Steven, who's quite talented with the knitting needles. It's always remarkable how much comfort a hand-knit piece can bring, isn't it? He studied at St. John's College-Santa Fe, have you heard of it by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #3: Gwen Pierce said: \"St. John's College-Santa Fe, I can't recall anyone from my circle who went there, but it seems like an interesting place. Speaking of colleges, I have a few friends who attended unique schools. They all have their distinctive hobbies that I find amusing. For instance, one particularly loves blacksmithing, while another is passionate about weightlifting. I find it enriching to have friends with varied interests, don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I wholeheartedly agree, Gwen. The variety of interests and skills within a social circle adds a great depth of character to it. A friend of mine, Joe, has a penchant for blacksmithing. He studied at Saint Joseph's University and crafted the most remarkable things from metal. Have you by chance met someone from there who shares this unique hobby?\"\n\nTurn #5: Gwen Pierce said: \"Saint Joseph's University, huh? I'm afraid I don't recall any of my friends mentioning they studied there. However, I do have a friend who shares the same interest in blacksmithing. His name is Johnnie, and he attended the University of Akron. Is blacksmithing a common hobby amongst your friends, or it just happened to be a coincidence?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ah, a coincidence indeed, Gwen. Blacksmithing, while fascinating, is not a common hobby among my acquaintances. As a matter of fact, most of my friends are into rather diverse pastimes. For instance, one of them, Charles, is an avid player of ice hockey. He went to Saint Joseph's University as well, just like Joe. It's truly incredible how varied everyone's interests can be, isn't it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Gwen Pierce\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nGwen Pierce's background: \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMelissa: Hobby: Card collecting School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nOrlando: Hobby: BASE jumping School: St. Ambrose University \nSteven: Hobby: Knitting School: St. John's College-Santa Fe \nElizabeth: Hobby: Water sports School: St. John's College-Santa Fe \nMelaine: Hobby: Geocaching School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nCharles: Hobby: Ice hockey School: Saint Joseph's University \nStephanie: Hobby: Card collecting School: University of California, Davis \nWilliam: Hobby: Ice hockey School: St. Ambrose University \nJoe: Hobby: Blacksmithing School: Saint Joseph's University \nMicheline: Hobby: Shopping School: University of Hartford \nDylan: Hobby: Card collecting School: Tennessee State University \n\nGwen Pierce's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, a pleasure to see a new face, even for an old lighthouse keeper like me. My name\u2019s Finnegan. The seclusion makes for excellent seascape painting time, though. Ever dabbled in creative arts yourself, Gwen?\"\n\nTurn #1: Gwen Pierce said: \"Nice to meet you, Finnegan. The seclusion sounds peaceful indeed. Creative arts, you ask? Well, I can't say I've tried painting, but I do engage in knitting. I find it relaxing and satisfying, especially when my knitted pieces bring warmth to someone who needs it. By the way, do you also have friends who are into crafts or interesting hobbies? I love meeting like-minded individuals!\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, you're into knitting! That's wonderful. I have a good friend, Steven, who's quite talented with the knitting needles. It's always remarkable how much comfort a hand-knit piece can bring, isn't it? He studied at St. John's College-Santa Fe, have you heard of it by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #3: Gwen Pierce said: \"St. John's College-Santa Fe, I can't recall anyone from my circle who went there, but it seems like an interesting place. Speaking of colleges, I have a few friends who attended unique schools. They all have their distinctive hobbies that I find amusing. For instance, one particularly loves blacksmithing, while another is passionate about weightlifting. I find it enriching to have friends with varied interests, don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I wholeheartedly agree, Gwen. The variety of interests and skills within a social circle adds a great depth of character to it. A friend of mine, Joe, has a penchant for blacksmithing. He studied at Saint Joseph's University and crafted the most remarkable things from metal. Have you by chance met someone from there who shares this unique hobby?\"\n\nTurn #5: Gwen Pierce said: \"Saint Joseph's University, huh? I'm afraid I don't recall any of my friends mentioning they studied there. However, I do have a friend who shares the same interest in blacksmithing. His name is Johnnie, and he attended the University of Akron. Is blacksmithing a common hobby amongst your friends, or it just happened to be a coincidence?\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, a coincidence indeed, Gwen. Blacksmithing, while fascinating, is not a common hobby among my acquaintances. As a matter of fact, most of my friends are into rather diverse pastimes. For instance, one of them, Charles, is an avid player of ice hockey. He went to Saint Joseph's University as well, just like Joe. It's truly incredible how varied everyone's interests can be, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #7: Gwen Pierce said: \"Oh, I do believe I know someone who loved playing ice hockey during their college years, but it slips my mind where they went to school. Speaking of sports, I have a friend, Cynthia, who is quite a sports enthusiast. She's devoted to Lacrosse and as if that's not enough, she also does water sports. She studied at Kansas State University and the University of Akron, respectively. I often wonder how she manages her energy! Does anyone from your circle share these interests, by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Oh, a devotion to water sports, quite interesting! I do know someone, Elizabeth, who also has a passion for water sports. She attended St. John's College-Santa Fe, just like my friend Steven. I am always amazed at how people can find so much joy in different activities. By the way, with such a broad circle, you must have friends involved in numerous hobbies. Anything like card collecting or geocaching?\"\n\nTurn #9: Gwen Pierce said: \"Card collecting and geocaching, you say? How intriguing! I do indeed have friends who enjoy these hobbies. Jacob, an old college mate from Whittier College, is never seen without his assortment of unique cards. And then there's Eva, an adventurous soul who went to Hesston College, enamored by the thrill of geocaching. Each friend indeed adds a unique shade to the canvas of my social life. Do any of your friends share a similar enthusiasm for these hobbies?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, I do, Gwen. My friends Melissa and Dylan are avid card collectors. It's intriguing to see their passion for collecting unique cards. And another friend of mine, Melaine, loves geocaching. The thrill and adventure are quite endearing to her. She honed her problem-solving abilities at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, which makes her very good at it. Have these universities ever come up in your circles?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Gwen Pierce\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nGwen Pierce's background: \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMelissa: Hobby: Card collecting School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nOrlando: Hobby: BASE jumping School: St. Ambrose University \nSteven: Hobby: Knitting School: St. John's College-Santa Fe \nElizabeth: Hobby: Water sports School: St. John's College-Santa Fe \nMelaine: Hobby: Geocaching School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nCharles: Hobby: Ice hockey School: Saint Joseph's University \nStephanie: Hobby: Card collecting School: University of California, Davis \nWilliam: Hobby: Ice hockey School: St. Ambrose University \nJoe: Hobby: Blacksmithing School: Saint Joseph's University \nMicheline: Hobby: Shopping School: University of Hartford \nDylan: Hobby: Card collecting School: Tennessee State University \n\nGwen Pierce's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, a pleasure to see a new face, even for an old lighthouse keeper like me. My name\u2019s Finnegan. The seclusion makes for excellent seascape painting time, though. Ever dabbled in creative arts yourself, Gwen?\"\n\nTurn #1: Gwen Pierce said: \"Nice to meet you, Finnegan. The seclusion sounds peaceful indeed. Creative arts, you ask? Well, I can't say I've tried painting, but I do engage in knitting. I find it relaxing and satisfying, especially when my knitted pieces bring warmth to someone who needs it. By the way, do you also have friends who are into crafts or interesting hobbies? I love meeting like-minded individuals!\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, you're into knitting! That's wonderful. I have a good friend, Steven, who's quite talented with the knitting needles. It's always remarkable how much comfort a hand-knit piece can bring, isn't it? He studied at St. John's College-Santa Fe, have you heard of it by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #3: Gwen Pierce said: \"St. John's College-Santa Fe, I can't recall anyone from my circle who went there, but it seems like an interesting place. Speaking of colleges, I have a few friends who attended unique schools. They all have their distinctive hobbies that I find amusing. For instance, one particularly loves blacksmithing, while another is passionate about weightlifting. I find it enriching to have friends with varied interests, don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I wholeheartedly agree, Gwen. The variety of interests and skills within a social circle adds a great depth of character to it. A friend of mine, Joe, has a penchant for blacksmithing. He studied at Saint Joseph's University and crafted the most remarkable things from metal. Have you by chance met someone from there who shares this unique hobby?\"\n\nTurn #5: Gwen Pierce said: \"Saint Joseph's University, huh? I'm afraid I don't recall any of my friends mentioning they studied there. However, I do have a friend who shares the same interest in blacksmithing. His name is Johnnie, and he attended the University of Akron. Is blacksmithing a common hobby amongst your friends, or it just happened to be a coincidence?\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, a coincidence indeed, Gwen. Blacksmithing, while fascinating, is not a common hobby among my acquaintances. As a matter of fact, most of my friends are into rather diverse pastimes. For instance, one of them, Charles, is an avid player of ice hockey. He went to Saint Joseph's University as well, just like Joe. It's truly incredible how varied everyone's interests can be, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #7: Gwen Pierce said: \"Oh, I do believe I know someone who loved playing ice hockey during their college years, but it slips my mind where they went to school. Speaking of sports, I have a friend, Cynthia, who is quite a sports enthusiast. She's devoted to Lacrosse and as if that's not enough, she also does water sports. She studied at Kansas State University and the University of Akron, respectively. I often wonder how she manages her energy! Does anyone from your circle share these interests, by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Oh, a devotion to water sports, quite interesting! I do know someone, Elizabeth, who also has a passion for water sports. She attended St. John's College-Santa Fe, just like my friend Steven. I am always amazed at how people can find so much joy in different activities. By the way, with such a broad circle, you must have friends involved in numerous hobbies. Anything like card collecting or geocaching?\"\n\nTurn #9: Gwen Pierce said: \"Card collecting and geocaching, you say? How intriguing! I do indeed have friends who enjoy these hobbies. Jacob, an old college mate from Whittier College, is never seen without his assortment of unique cards. And then there's Eva, an adventurous soul who went to Hesston College, enamored by the thrill of geocaching. Each friend indeed adds a unique shade to the canvas of my social life. Do any of your friends share a similar enthusiasm for these hobbies?\"\n\nTurn #10: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Indeed, I do, Gwen. My friends Melissa and Dylan are avid card collectors. It's intriguing to see their passion for collecting unique cards. And another friend of mine, Melaine, loves geocaching. The thrill and adventure are quite endearing to her. She honed her problem-solving abilities at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, which makes her very good at it. Have these universities ever come up in your circles?\"\n\nTurn #11: Gwen Pierce said: \"Oh, the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, indeed! I remember my friend Marjorie sharing interesting stories about her time there. She's now an expert in foraging - quite an unconventional hobby, but I believe it complements her studies perfectly. Isn't it fascinating how education can shape our interests in such unique ways? As for card collectors, do you happen to know anyone from Whittier College involved in this hobby?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ah, Whittier College rings a bell indeed, though none of my card-collecting friends hail from there, I'm afraid. You know, Gwen, I think it's fascinating how an activity as simple as collecting cards can bring together people from such diverse walks of life. In a way, it's like we're all pieces of a gigantic puzzle. And speaking of puzzles, isn't it wonderful to stumble upon a new piece that fits just right? Had the pleasure of encountering anyone from University of California, Davis?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Gwen Pierce\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nGwen Pierce's background: \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMelissa: Hobby: Card collecting School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nOrlando: Hobby: BASE jumping School: St. Ambrose University \nSteven: Hobby: Knitting School: St. John's College-Santa Fe \nElizabeth: Hobby: Water sports School: St. John's College-Santa Fe \nMelaine: Hobby: Geocaching School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nCharles: Hobby: Ice hockey School: Saint Joseph's University \nStephanie: Hobby: Card collecting School: University of California, Davis \nWilliam: Hobby: Ice hockey School: St. Ambrose University \nJoe: Hobby: Blacksmithing School: Saint Joseph's University \nMicheline: Hobby: Shopping School: University of Hartford \nDylan: Hobby: Card collecting School: Tennessee State University \n\nGwen Pierce's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, a pleasure to see a new face, even for an old lighthouse keeper like me. My name\u2019s Finnegan. The seclusion makes for excellent seascape painting time, though. Ever dabbled in creative arts yourself, Gwen?\"\n\nTurn #1: Gwen Pierce said: \"Nice to meet you, Finnegan. The seclusion sounds peaceful indeed. Creative arts, you ask? Well, I can't say I've tried painting, but I do engage in knitting. I find it relaxing and satisfying, especially when my knitted pieces bring warmth to someone who needs it. By the way, do you also have friends who are into crafts or interesting hobbies? I love meeting like-minded individuals!\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, you're into knitting! That's wonderful. I have a good friend, Steven, who's quite talented with the knitting needles. It's always remarkable how much comfort a hand-knit piece can bring, isn't it? He studied at St. John's College-Santa Fe, have you heard of it by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #3: Gwen Pierce said: \"St. John's College-Santa Fe, I can't recall anyone from my circle who went there, but it seems like an interesting place. Speaking of colleges, I have a few friends who attended unique schools. They all have their distinctive hobbies that I find amusing. For instance, one particularly loves blacksmithing, while another is passionate about weightlifting. I find it enriching to have friends with varied interests, don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I wholeheartedly agree, Gwen. The variety of interests and skills within a social circle adds a great depth of character to it. A friend of mine, Joe, has a penchant for blacksmithing. He studied at Saint Joseph's University and crafted the most remarkable things from metal. Have you by chance met someone from there who shares this unique hobby?\"\n\nTurn #5: Gwen Pierce said: \"Saint Joseph's University, huh? I'm afraid I don't recall any of my friends mentioning they studied there. However, I do have a friend who shares the same interest in blacksmithing. His name is Johnnie, and he attended the University of Akron. Is blacksmithing a common hobby amongst your friends, or it just happened to be a coincidence?\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, a coincidence indeed, Gwen. Blacksmithing, while fascinating, is not a common hobby among my acquaintances. As a matter of fact, most of my friends are into rather diverse pastimes. For instance, one of them, Charles, is an avid player of ice hockey. He went to Saint Joseph's University as well, just like Joe. It's truly incredible how varied everyone's interests can be, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #7: Gwen Pierce said: \"Oh, I do believe I know someone who loved playing ice hockey during their college years, but it slips my mind where they went to school. Speaking of sports, I have a friend, Cynthia, who is quite a sports enthusiast. She's devoted to Lacrosse and as if that's not enough, she also does water sports. She studied at Kansas State University and the University of Akron, respectively. I often wonder how she manages her energy! Does anyone from your circle share these interests, by any chance?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oh, a devotion to water sports, quite interesting! I do know someone, Elizabeth, who also has a passion for water sports. She attended St. John's College-Santa Fe, just like my friend Steven. I am always amazed at how people can find so much joy in different activities. By the way, with such a broad circle, you must have friends involved in numerous hobbies. Anything like card collecting or geocaching?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Gwen Pierce\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nGwen Pierce's background: \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMelissa: Hobby: Card collecting School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nOrlando: Hobby: BASE jumping School: St. Ambrose University \nSteven: Hobby: Knitting School: St. John's College-Santa Fe \nElizabeth: Hobby: Water sports School: St. John's College-Santa Fe \nMelaine: Hobby: Geocaching School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nCharles: Hobby: Ice hockey School: Saint Joseph's University \nStephanie: Hobby: Card collecting School: University of California, Davis \nWilliam: Hobby: Ice hockey School: St. Ambrose University \nJoe: Hobby: Blacksmithing School: Saint Joseph's University \nMicheline: Hobby: Shopping School: University of Hartford \nDylan: Hobby: Card collecting School: Tennessee State University \n\nGwen Pierce's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, a pleasure to see a new face, even for an old lighthouse keeper like me. My name\u2019s Finnegan. The seclusion makes for excellent seascape painting time, though. Ever dabbled in creative arts yourself, Gwen?\"\n\nTurn #1: Gwen Pierce said: \"Nice to meet you, Finnegan. The seclusion sounds peaceful indeed. Creative arts, you ask? Well, I can't say I've tried painting, but I do engage in knitting. I find it relaxing and satisfying, especially when my knitted pieces bring warmth to someone who needs it. By the way, do you also have friends who are into crafts or interesting hobbies? I love meeting like-minded individuals!\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, you're into knitting! That's wonderful. I have a good friend, Steven, who's quite talented with the knitting needles. It's always remarkable how much comfort a hand-knit piece can bring, isn't it? He studied at St. John's College-Santa Fe, have you heard of it by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #3: Gwen Pierce said: \"St. John's College-Santa Fe, I can't recall anyone from my circle who went there, but it seems like an interesting place. Speaking of colleges, I have a few friends who attended unique schools. They all have their distinctive hobbies that I find amusing. For instance, one particularly loves blacksmithing, while another is passionate about weightlifting. I find it enriching to have friends with varied interests, don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I wholeheartedly agree, Gwen. The variety of interests and skills within a social circle adds a great depth of character to it. A friend of mine, Joe, has a penchant for blacksmithing. He studied at Saint Joseph's University and crafted the most remarkable things from metal. Have you by chance met someone from there who shares this unique hobby?\"\n\nTurn #5: Gwen Pierce said: \"Saint Joseph's University, huh? I'm afraid I don't recall any of my friends mentioning they studied there. However, I do have a friend who shares the same interest in blacksmithing. His name is Johnnie, and he attended the University of Akron. Is blacksmithing a common hobby amongst your friends, or it just happened to be a coincidence?\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, a coincidence indeed, Gwen. Blacksmithing, while fascinating, is not a common hobby among my acquaintances. As a matter of fact, most of my friends are into rather diverse pastimes. For instance, one of them, Charles, is an avid player of ice hockey. He went to Saint Joseph's University as well, just like Joe. It's truly incredible how varied everyone's interests can be, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #7: Gwen Pierce said: \"Oh, I do believe I know someone who loved playing ice hockey during their college years, but it slips my mind where they went to school. Speaking of sports, I have a friend, Cynthia, who is quite a sports enthusiast. She's devoted to Lacrosse and as if that's not enough, she also does water sports. She studied at Kansas State University and the University of Akron, respectively. I often wonder how she manages her energy! Does anyone from your circle share these interests, by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Oh, a devotion to water sports, quite interesting! I do know someone, Elizabeth, who also has a passion for water sports. She attended St. John's College-Santa Fe, just like my friend Steven. I am always amazed at how people can find so much joy in different activities. By the way, with such a broad circle, you must have friends involved in numerous hobbies. Anything like card collecting or geocaching?\"\n\nTurn #9: Gwen Pierce said: \"Card collecting and geocaching, you say? How intriguing! I do indeed have friends who enjoy these hobbies. Jacob, an old college mate from Whittier College, is never seen without his assortment of unique cards. And then there's Eva, an adventurous soul who went to Hesston College, enamored by the thrill of geocaching. Each friend indeed adds a unique shade to the canvas of my social life. Do any of your friends share a similar enthusiasm for these hobbies?\"\n\nTurn #10: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Indeed, I do, Gwen. My friends Melissa and Dylan are avid card collectors. It's intriguing to see their passion for collecting unique cards. And another friend of mine, Melaine, loves geocaching. The thrill and adventure are quite endearing to her. She honed her problem-solving abilities at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, which makes her very good at it. Have these universities ever come up in your circles?\"\n\nTurn #11: Gwen Pierce said: \"Oh, the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, indeed! I remember my friend Marjorie sharing interesting stories about her time there. She's now an expert in foraging - quite an unconventional hobby, but I believe it complements her studies perfectly. Isn't it fascinating how education can shape our interests in such unique ways? As for card collectors, do you happen to know anyone from Whittier College involved in this hobby?\"\n\nTurn #12: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, Whittier College rings a bell indeed, though none of my card-collecting friends hail from there, I'm afraid. You know, Gwen, I think it's fascinating how an activity as simple as collecting cards can bring together people from such diverse walks of life. In a way, it's like we're all pieces of a gigantic puzzle. And speaking of puzzles, isn't it wonderful to stumble upon a new piece that fits just right? Had the pleasure of encountering anyone from University of California, Davis?\"\n\nTurn #13: Gwen Pierce said: \"University of California, Davis? Now that's a name I hear quite often from my friend John. He's got an adventurous spirit and spends a great deal of his time foraging. A rather unconventional hobby but, much like your friend Marjorie, it complements his lifestyle well. What about University of Hartford or Hesston College? Have you perhaps come across anyone from these institutions?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, University of Hartford sounds quite familiar, Gwen. A friend of mine, Micheline, was a student there. She's quite the shopper, always out looking for the next great find. It's fascinating how certain schools seem to breed certain types of people, isn't it? Unfortunately, I don't know anyone who attended Hesston College, though I must admit your friend Eva's adventures in geocaching sound thrilling!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Gwen Pierce\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nGwen Pierce's background: \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMelissa: Hobby: Card collecting School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nOrlando: Hobby: BASE jumping School: St. Ambrose University \nSteven: Hobby: Knitting School: St. John's College-Santa Fe \nElizabeth: Hobby: Water sports School: St. John's College-Santa Fe \nMelaine: Hobby: Geocaching School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nCharles: Hobby: Ice hockey School: Saint Joseph's University \nStephanie: Hobby: Card collecting School: University of California, Davis \nWilliam: Hobby: Ice hockey School: St. Ambrose University \nJoe: Hobby: Blacksmithing School: Saint Joseph's University \nMicheline: Hobby: Shopping School: University of Hartford \nDylan: Hobby: Card collecting School: Tennessee State University \n\nGwen Pierce's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, a pleasure to see a new face, even for an old lighthouse keeper like me. My name\u2019s Finnegan. The seclusion makes for excellent seascape painting time, though. Ever dabbled in creative arts yourself, Gwen?\"\n\nTurn #1: Gwen Pierce said: \"Nice to meet you, Finnegan. The seclusion sounds peaceful indeed. Creative arts, you ask? Well, I can't say I've tried painting, but I do engage in knitting. I find it relaxing and satisfying, especially when my knitted pieces bring warmth to someone who needs it. By the way, do you also have friends who are into crafts or interesting hobbies? I love meeting like-minded individuals!\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, you're into knitting! That's wonderful. I have a good friend, Steven, who's quite talented with the knitting needles. It's always remarkable how much comfort a hand-knit piece can bring, isn't it? He studied at St. John's College-Santa Fe, have you heard of it by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #3: Gwen Pierce said: \"St. John's College-Santa Fe, I can't recall anyone from my circle who went there, but it seems like an interesting place. Speaking of colleges, I have a few friends who attended unique schools. They all have their distinctive hobbies that I find amusing. For instance, one particularly loves blacksmithing, while another is passionate about weightlifting. I find it enriching to have friends with varied interests, don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I wholeheartedly agree, Gwen. The variety of interests and skills within a social circle adds a great depth of character to it. A friend of mine, Joe, has a penchant for blacksmithing. He studied at Saint Joseph's University and crafted the most remarkable things from metal. Have you by chance met someone from there who shares this unique hobby?\"\n\nTurn #5: Gwen Pierce said: \"Saint Joseph's University, huh? I'm afraid I don't recall any of my friends mentioning they studied there. However, I do have a friend who shares the same interest in blacksmithing. His name is Johnnie, and he attended the University of Akron. Is blacksmithing a common hobby amongst your friends, or it just happened to be a coincidence?\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, a coincidence indeed, Gwen. Blacksmithing, while fascinating, is not a common hobby among my acquaintances. As a matter of fact, most of my friends are into rather diverse pastimes. For instance, one of them, Charles, is an avid player of ice hockey. He went to Saint Joseph's University as well, just like Joe. It's truly incredible how varied everyone's interests can be, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #7: Gwen Pierce said: \"Oh, I do believe I know someone who loved playing ice hockey during their college years, but it slips my mind where they went to school. Speaking of sports, I have a friend, Cynthia, who is quite a sports enthusiast. She's devoted to Lacrosse and as if that's not enough, she also does water sports. She studied at Kansas State University and the University of Akron, respectively. I often wonder how she manages her energy! Does anyone from your circle share these interests, by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Oh, a devotion to water sports, quite interesting! I do know someone, Elizabeth, who also has a passion for water sports. She attended St. John's College-Santa Fe, just like my friend Steven. I am always amazed at how people can find so much joy in different activities. By the way, with such a broad circle, you must have friends involved in numerous hobbies. Anything like card collecting or geocaching?\"\n\nTurn #9: Gwen Pierce said: \"Card collecting and geocaching, you say? How intriguing! I do indeed have friends who enjoy these hobbies. Jacob, an old college mate from Whittier College, is never seen without his assortment of unique cards. And then there's Eva, an adventurous soul who went to Hesston College, enamored by the thrill of geocaching. Each friend indeed adds a unique shade to the canvas of my social life. Do any of your friends share a similar enthusiasm for these hobbies?\"\n\nTurn #10: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Indeed, I do, Gwen. My friends Melissa and Dylan are avid card collectors. It's intriguing to see their passion for collecting unique cards. And another friend of mine, Melaine, loves geocaching. The thrill and adventure are quite endearing to her. She honed her problem-solving abilities at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, which makes her very good at it. Have these universities ever come up in your circles?\"\n\nTurn #11: Gwen Pierce said: \"Oh, the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, indeed! I remember my friend Marjorie sharing interesting stories about her time there. She's now an expert in foraging - quite an unconventional hobby, but I believe it complements her studies perfectly. Isn't it fascinating how education can shape our interests in such unique ways? As for card collectors, do you happen to know anyone from Whittier College involved in this hobby?\"\n\nTurn #12: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, Whittier College rings a bell indeed, though none of my card-collecting friends hail from there, I'm afraid. You know, Gwen, I think it's fascinating how an activity as simple as collecting cards can bring together people from such diverse walks of life. In a way, it's like we're all pieces of a gigantic puzzle. And speaking of puzzles, isn't it wonderful to stumble upon a new piece that fits just right? Had the pleasure of encountering anyone from University of California, Davis?\"\n\nTurn #13: Gwen Pierce said: \"University of California, Davis? Now that's a name I hear quite often from my friend John. He's got an adventurous spirit and spends a great deal of his time foraging. A rather unconventional hobby but, much like your friend Marjorie, it complements his lifestyle well. What about University of Hartford or Hesston College? Have you perhaps come across anyone from these institutions?\"\n\nTurn #14: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Indeed, University of Hartford sounds quite familiar, Gwen. A friend of mine, Micheline, was a student there. She's quite the shopper, always out looking for the next great find. It's fascinating how certain schools seem to breed certain types of people, isn't it? Unfortunately, I don't know anyone who attended Hesston College, though I must admit your friend Eva's adventures in geocaching sound thrilling!\"\n\nTurn #15: Gwen Pierce said: \"That sounds like a wonderful coincidence, Finnegan! My friend Micheline, a shopaholic from the University of Hartford, would absolutely love to meet your friend from the same university. It truly is fascinating how diverse interests can unite people from such different walks of life. And you're right, Eva's geocaching adventures are indeed thrilling! Perhaps in the future, there might be a chance for you to meet someone from Hesston College or even Indiana University at South Bend, who knows?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ah, Indiana University at South Bend, I don't believe any of my friends went there. But I do agree with you, Gwen, about the wide range of possibilities. I suppose the future has countless interesting encounters in store for us. By the way, do you happen to have any connection with Tennessee State University? I ask because I have a card-collecting friend Dylan who went there. Just curious!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Gwen Pierce\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nGwen Pierce's background: \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMelissa: Hobby: Card collecting School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nOrlando: Hobby: BASE jumping School: St. Ambrose University \nSteven: Hobby: Knitting School: St. John's College-Santa Fe \nElizabeth: Hobby: Water sports School: St. John's College-Santa Fe \nMelaine: Hobby: Geocaching School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nCharles: Hobby: Ice hockey School: Saint Joseph's University \nStephanie: Hobby: Card collecting School: University of California, Davis \nWilliam: Hobby: Ice hockey School: St. Ambrose University \nJoe: Hobby: Blacksmithing School: Saint Joseph's University \nMicheline: Hobby: Shopping School: University of Hartford \nDylan: Hobby: Card collecting School: Tennessee State University \n\nGwen Pierce's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, a pleasure to see a new face, even for an old lighthouse keeper like me. My name\u2019s Finnegan. The seclusion makes for excellent seascape painting time, though. Ever dabbled in creative arts yourself, Gwen?\"\n\nTurn #1: Gwen Pierce said: \"Nice to meet you, Finnegan. The seclusion sounds peaceful indeed. Creative arts, you ask? Well, I can't say I've tried painting, but I do engage in knitting. I find it relaxing and satisfying, especially when my knitted pieces bring warmth to someone who needs it. By the way, do you also have friends who are into crafts or interesting hobbies? I love meeting like-minded individuals!\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, you're into knitting! That's wonderful. I have a good friend, Steven, who's quite talented with the knitting needles. It's always remarkable how much comfort a hand-knit piece can bring, isn't it? He studied at St. John's College-Santa Fe, have you heard of it by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #3: Gwen Pierce said: \"St. John's College-Santa Fe, I can't recall anyone from my circle who went there, but it seems like an interesting place. Speaking of colleges, I have a few friends who attended unique schools. They all have their distinctive hobbies that I find amusing. For instance, one particularly loves blacksmithing, while another is passionate about weightlifting. I find it enriching to have friends with varied interests, don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I wholeheartedly agree, Gwen. The variety of interests and skills within a social circle adds a great depth of character to it. A friend of mine, Joe, has a penchant for blacksmithing. He studied at Saint Joseph's University and crafted the most remarkable things from metal. Have you by chance met someone from there who shares this unique hobby?\"\n\nTurn #5: Gwen Pierce said: \"Saint Joseph's University, huh? I'm afraid I don't recall any of my friends mentioning they studied there. However, I do have a friend who shares the same interest in blacksmithing. His name is Johnnie, and he attended the University of Akron. Is blacksmithing a common hobby amongst your friends, or it just happened to be a coincidence?\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, a coincidence indeed, Gwen. Blacksmithing, while fascinating, is not a common hobby among my acquaintances. As a matter of fact, most of my friends are into rather diverse pastimes. For instance, one of them, Charles, is an avid player of ice hockey. He went to Saint Joseph's University as well, just like Joe. It's truly incredible how varied everyone's interests can be, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #7: Gwen Pierce said: \"Oh, I do believe I know someone who loved playing ice hockey during their college years, but it slips my mind where they went to school. Speaking of sports, I have a friend, Cynthia, who is quite a sports enthusiast. She's devoted to Lacrosse and as if that's not enough, she also does water sports. She studied at Kansas State University and the University of Akron, respectively. I often wonder how she manages her energy! Does anyone from your circle share these interests, by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Oh, a devotion to water sports, quite interesting! I do know someone, Elizabeth, who also has a passion for water sports. She attended St. John's College-Santa Fe, just like my friend Steven. I am always amazed at how people can find so much joy in different activities. By the way, with such a broad circle, you must have friends involved in numerous hobbies. Anything like card collecting or geocaching?\"\n\nTurn #9: Gwen Pierce said: \"Card collecting and geocaching, you say? How intriguing! I do indeed have friends who enjoy these hobbies. Jacob, an old college mate from Whittier College, is never seen without his assortment of unique cards. And then there's Eva, an adventurous soul who went to Hesston College, enamored by the thrill of geocaching. Each friend indeed adds a unique shade to the canvas of my social life. Do any of your friends share a similar enthusiasm for these hobbies?\"\n\nTurn #10: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Indeed, I do, Gwen. My friends Melissa and Dylan are avid card collectors. It's intriguing to see their passion for collecting unique cards. And another friend of mine, Melaine, loves geocaching. The thrill and adventure are quite endearing to her. She honed her problem-solving abilities at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, which makes her very good at it. Have these universities ever come up in your circles?\"\n\nTurn #11: Gwen Pierce said: \"Oh, the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, indeed! I remember my friend Marjorie sharing interesting stories about her time there. She's now an expert in foraging - quite an unconventional hobby, but I believe it complements her studies perfectly. Isn't it fascinating how education can shape our interests in such unique ways? As for card collectors, do you happen to know anyone from Whittier College involved in this hobby?\"\n\nTurn #12: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, Whittier College rings a bell indeed, though none of my card-collecting friends hail from there, I'm afraid. You know, Gwen, I think it's fascinating how an activity as simple as collecting cards can bring together people from such diverse walks of life. In a way, it's like we're all pieces of a gigantic puzzle. And speaking of puzzles, isn't it wonderful to stumble upon a new piece that fits just right? Had the pleasure of encountering anyone from University of California, Davis?\"\n\nTurn #13: Gwen Pierce said: \"University of California, Davis? Now that's a name I hear quite often from my friend John. He's got an adventurous spirit and spends a great deal of his time foraging. A rather unconventional hobby but, much like your friend Marjorie, it complements his lifestyle well. What about University of Hartford or Hesston College? Have you perhaps come across anyone from these institutions?\"\n\nTurn #14: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Indeed, University of Hartford sounds quite familiar, Gwen. A friend of mine, Micheline, was a student there. She's quite the shopper, always out looking for the next great find. It's fascinating how certain schools seem to breed certain types of people, isn't it? Unfortunately, I don't know anyone who attended Hesston College, though I must admit your friend Eva's adventures in geocaching sound thrilling!\"\n\nTurn #15: Gwen Pierce said: \"That sounds like a wonderful coincidence, Finnegan! My friend Micheline, a shopaholic from the University of Hartford, would absolutely love to meet your friend from the same university. It truly is fascinating how diverse interests can unite people from such different walks of life. And you're right, Eva's geocaching adventures are indeed thrilling! Perhaps in the future, there might be a chance for you to meet someone from Hesston College or even Indiana University at South Bend, who knows?\"\n\nTurn #16: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, Indiana University at South Bend, I don't believe any of my friends went there. But I do agree with you, Gwen, about the wide range of possibilities. I suppose the future has countless interesting encounters in store for us. By the way, do you happen to have any connection with Tennessee State University? I ask because I have a card-collecting friend Dylan who went there. Just curious!\"\n\nTurn #17: Gwen Pierce said: \"Tennessee State University? Yes, indeed, I have a dear friend, Carrie, who went there! She's an adventurous spirit and enjoys geocaching. Like card collecting, it's intriguing how hobbies can unite people. It\u2019s delightful to learn about your friend Dylan\u2019s interest in the same hobby. Life is so full of remarkable intersections, don't you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #18. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Gwen. It's like we're all woven together in an immense tapestry of experiences and interests. It's refreshing to find these intersections where our paths cross. I'm glad to know that your friend Carrie and my friend Dylan share a common interest. It has been delightful getting to know you, and I hope we'll have more opportunities to share stories in the future.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Gwen Pierce, your task is to act/speak as Gwen Pierce would, keeping in mind Gwen Pierce's social goal.\nYou can find Gwen Pierce's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Gwen Pierce's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Gwen Pierce's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Gwen Pierce\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: \nGwen Pierce's background: Gwen Pierce is a 31-year-old female social worker. She/her pronouns. Gwen Pierce, a compassionate social worker, has two adopted cats that she spoils with love. In her spare time, she enjoys knitting and often donates her creations to charity. Personality and values description: Gwen Pierce, imaginative and emotional, deeply values liberty and fairness. She often contemplates before making any decision. Gwen's secrets: She gave up a child for adoption when she was 16.\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nGwen Pierce's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nJacob: Hobby: Card collecting School: Whittier College \nMarjorie: Hobby: Foraging School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nCarrie: Hobby: Geocaching School: Tennessee State University \nLouis: Hobby: Shopping School: Hesston College \nMicheline: Hobby: Shopping School: University of Hartford \nEva: Hobby: Geocaching School: Hesston College \nJohnnie: Hobby: Blacksmithing School: University of Akron \nJohn: Hobby: Foraging School: University of California, Davis \nRonald: Hobby: Weightlifting School: Indiana University at South Bend \nCynthia: Hobby: Lacrosse School: Kansas State University \nRobert: Hobby: Water sports School: University of Akron\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, a pleasure to see a new face, even for an old lighthouse keeper like me. My name\u2019s Finnegan. The seclusion makes for excellent seascape painting time, though. Ever dabbled in creative arts yourself, Gwen?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Nice to meet you, Finnegan. The seclusion sounds peaceful indeed. Creative arts, you ask? Well, I can't say I've tried painting, but I do engage in knitting. I find it relaxing and satisfying, especially when my knitted pieces bring warmth to someone who needs it. By the way, do you also have friends who are into crafts or interesting hobbies? I love meeting like-minded individuals!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Gwen Pierce, your task is to act/speak as Gwen Pierce would, keeping in mind Gwen Pierce's social goal.\nYou can find Gwen Pierce's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Gwen Pierce's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Gwen Pierce's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Gwen Pierce\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: \nGwen Pierce's background: Gwen Pierce is a 31-year-old female social worker. She/her pronouns. Gwen Pierce, a compassionate social worker, has two adopted cats that she spoils with love. In her spare time, she enjoys knitting and often donates her creations to charity. Personality and values description: Gwen Pierce, imaginative and emotional, deeply values liberty and fairness. She often contemplates before making any decision. Gwen's secrets: She gave up a child for adoption when she was 16.\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nGwen Pierce's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nJacob: Hobby: Card collecting School: Whittier College \nMarjorie: Hobby: Foraging School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nCarrie: Hobby: Geocaching School: Tennessee State University \nLouis: Hobby: Shopping School: Hesston College \nMicheline: Hobby: Shopping School: University of Hartford \nEva: Hobby: Geocaching School: Hesston College \nJohnnie: Hobby: Blacksmithing School: University of Akron \nJohn: Hobby: Foraging School: University of California, Davis \nRonald: Hobby: Weightlifting School: Indiana University at South Bend \nCynthia: Hobby: Lacrosse School: Kansas State University \nRobert: Hobby: Water sports School: University of Akron\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, a pleasure to see a new face, even for an old lighthouse keeper like me. My name\u2019s Finnegan. The seclusion makes for excellent seascape painting time, though. Ever dabbled in creative arts yourself, Gwen?\"\n\nTurn #1: Gwen Pierce said: \"Nice to meet you, Finnegan. The seclusion sounds peaceful indeed. Creative arts, you ask? Well, I can't say I've tried painting, but I do engage in knitting. I find it relaxing and satisfying, especially when my knitted pieces bring warmth to someone who needs it. By the way, do you also have friends who are into crafts or interesting hobbies? I love meeting like-minded individuals!\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, you're into knitting! That's wonderful. I have a good friend, Steven, who's quite talented with the knitting needles. It's always remarkable how much comfort a hand-knit piece can bring, isn't it? He studied at St. John's College-Santa Fe, have you heard of it by any chance?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"St. John's College-Santa Fe, I can't recall anyone from my circle who went there, but it seems like an interesting place. Speaking of colleges, I have a few friends who attended unique schools. They all have their distinctive hobbies that I find amusing. For instance, one particularly loves blacksmithing, while another is passionate about weightlifting. I find it enriching to have friends with varied interests, don't you agree?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Gwen Pierce, your task is to act/speak as Gwen Pierce would, keeping in mind Gwen Pierce's social goal.\nYou can find Gwen Pierce's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Gwen Pierce's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Gwen Pierce's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Gwen Pierce\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: \nGwen Pierce's background: Gwen Pierce is a 31-year-old female social worker. She/her pronouns. Gwen Pierce, a compassionate social worker, has two adopted cats that she spoils with love. In her spare time, she enjoys knitting and often donates her creations to charity. Personality and values description: Gwen Pierce, imaginative and emotional, deeply values liberty and fairness. She often contemplates before making any decision. Gwen's secrets: She gave up a child for adoption when she was 16.\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nGwen Pierce's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nJacob: Hobby: Card collecting School: Whittier College \nMarjorie: Hobby: Foraging School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nCarrie: Hobby: Geocaching School: Tennessee State University \nLouis: Hobby: Shopping School: Hesston College \nMicheline: Hobby: Shopping School: University of Hartford \nEva: Hobby: Geocaching School: Hesston College \nJohnnie: Hobby: Blacksmithing School: University of Akron \nJohn: Hobby: Foraging School: University of California, Davis \nRonald: Hobby: Weightlifting School: Indiana University at South Bend \nCynthia: Hobby: Lacrosse School: Kansas State University \nRobert: Hobby: Water sports School: University of Akron\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, a pleasure to see a new face, even for an old lighthouse keeper like me. My name\u2019s Finnegan. The seclusion makes for excellent seascape painting time, though. Ever dabbled in creative arts yourself, Gwen?\"\n\nTurn #1: Gwen Pierce said: \"Nice to meet you, Finnegan. The seclusion sounds peaceful indeed. Creative arts, you ask? Well, I can't say I've tried painting, but I do engage in knitting. I find it relaxing and satisfying, especially when my knitted pieces bring warmth to someone who needs it. By the way, do you also have friends who are into crafts or interesting hobbies? I love meeting like-minded individuals!\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, you're into knitting! That's wonderful. I have a good friend, Steven, who's quite talented with the knitting needles. It's always remarkable how much comfort a hand-knit piece can bring, isn't it? He studied at St. John's College-Santa Fe, have you heard of it by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #3: Gwen Pierce said: \"St. John's College-Santa Fe, I can't recall anyone from my circle who went there, but it seems like an interesting place. Speaking of colleges, I have a few friends who attended unique schools. They all have their distinctive hobbies that I find amusing. For instance, one particularly loves blacksmithing, while another is passionate about weightlifting. I find it enriching to have friends with varied interests, don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I wholeheartedly agree, Gwen. The variety of interests and skills within a social circle adds a great depth of character to it. A friend of mine, Joe, has a penchant for blacksmithing. He studied at Saint Joseph's University and crafted the most remarkable things from metal. Have you by chance met someone from there who shares this unique hobby?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Saint Joseph's University, huh? I'm afraid I don't recall any of my friends mentioning they studied there. However, I do have a friend who shares the same interest in blacksmithing. His name is Johnnie, and he attended the University of Akron. Is blacksmithing a common hobby amongst your friends, or it just happened to be a coincidence?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Gwen Pierce, your task is to act/speak as Gwen Pierce would, keeping in mind Gwen Pierce's social goal.\nYou can find Gwen Pierce's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Gwen Pierce's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Gwen Pierce's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Gwen Pierce\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: \nGwen Pierce's background: Gwen Pierce is a 31-year-old female social worker. She/her pronouns. Gwen Pierce, a compassionate social worker, has two adopted cats that she spoils with love. In her spare time, she enjoys knitting and often donates her creations to charity. Personality and values description: Gwen Pierce, imaginative and emotional, deeply values liberty and fairness. She often contemplates before making any decision. Gwen's secrets: She gave up a child for adoption when she was 16.\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nGwen Pierce's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nJacob: Hobby: Card collecting School: Whittier College \nMarjorie: Hobby: Foraging School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nCarrie: Hobby: Geocaching School: Tennessee State University \nLouis: Hobby: Shopping School: Hesston College \nMicheline: Hobby: Shopping School: University of Hartford \nEva: Hobby: Geocaching School: Hesston College \nJohnnie: Hobby: Blacksmithing School: University of Akron \nJohn: Hobby: Foraging School: University of California, Davis \nRonald: Hobby: Weightlifting School: Indiana University at South Bend \nCynthia: Hobby: Lacrosse School: Kansas State University \nRobert: Hobby: Water sports School: University of Akron\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, a pleasure to see a new face, even for an old lighthouse keeper like me. My name\u2019s Finnegan. The seclusion makes for excellent seascape painting time, though. Ever dabbled in creative arts yourself, Gwen?\"\n\nTurn #1: Gwen Pierce said: \"Nice to meet you, Finnegan. The seclusion sounds peaceful indeed. Creative arts, you ask? Well, I can't say I've tried painting, but I do engage in knitting. I find it relaxing and satisfying, especially when my knitted pieces bring warmth to someone who needs it. By the way, do you also have friends who are into crafts or interesting hobbies? I love meeting like-minded individuals!\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, you're into knitting! That's wonderful. I have a good friend, Steven, who's quite talented with the knitting needles. It's always remarkable how much comfort a hand-knit piece can bring, isn't it? He studied at St. John's College-Santa Fe, have you heard of it by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #3: Gwen Pierce said: \"St. John's College-Santa Fe, I can't recall anyone from my circle who went there, but it seems like an interesting place. Speaking of colleges, I have a few friends who attended unique schools. They all have their distinctive hobbies that I find amusing. For instance, one particularly loves blacksmithing, while another is passionate about weightlifting. I find it enriching to have friends with varied interests, don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I wholeheartedly agree, Gwen. The variety of interests and skills within a social circle adds a great depth of character to it. A friend of mine, Joe, has a penchant for blacksmithing. He studied at Saint Joseph's University and crafted the most remarkable things from metal. Have you by chance met someone from there who shares this unique hobby?\"\n\nTurn #5: Gwen Pierce said: \"Saint Joseph's University, huh? I'm afraid I don't recall any of my friends mentioning they studied there. However, I do have a friend who shares the same interest in blacksmithing. His name is Johnnie, and he attended the University of Akron. Is blacksmithing a common hobby amongst your friends, or it just happened to be a coincidence?\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, a coincidence indeed, Gwen. Blacksmithing, while fascinating, is not a common hobby among my acquaintances. As a matter of fact, most of my friends are into rather diverse pastimes. For instance, one of them, Charles, is an avid player of ice hockey. He went to Saint Joseph's University as well, just like Joe. It's truly incredible how varied everyone's interests can be, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #7: Gwen Pierce said: \"Oh, I do believe I know someone who loved playing ice hockey during their college years, but it slips my mind where they went to school. Speaking of sports, I have a friend, Cynthia, who is quite a sports enthusiast. She's devoted to Lacrosse and as if that's not enough, she also does water sports. She studied at Kansas State University and the University of Akron, respectively. I often wonder how she manages her energy! Does anyone from your circle share these interests, by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Oh, a devotion to water sports, quite interesting! I do know someone, Elizabeth, who also has a passion for water sports. She attended St. John's College-Santa Fe, just like my friend Steven. I am always amazed at how people can find so much joy in different activities. By the way, with such a broad circle, you must have friends involved in numerous hobbies. Anything like card collecting or geocaching?\"\n\nTurn #9: Gwen Pierce said: \"Card collecting and geocaching, you say? How intriguing! I do indeed have friends who enjoy these hobbies. Jacob, an old college mate from Whittier College, is never seen without his assortment of unique cards. And then there's Eva, an adventurous soul who went to Hesston College, enamored by the thrill of geocaching. Each friend indeed adds a unique shade to the canvas of my social life. Do any of your friends share a similar enthusiasm for these hobbies?\"\n\nTurn #10: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Indeed, I do, Gwen. My friends Melissa and Dylan are avid card collectors. It's intriguing to see their passion for collecting unique cards. And another friend of mine, Melaine, loves geocaching. The thrill and adventure are quite endearing to her. She honed her problem-solving abilities at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, which makes her very good at it. Have these universities ever come up in your circles?\"\n\nTurn #11: Gwen Pierce said: \"Oh, the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, indeed! I remember my friend Marjorie sharing interesting stories about her time there. She's now an expert in foraging - quite an unconventional hobby, but I believe it complements her studies perfectly. Isn't it fascinating how education can shape our interests in such unique ways? As for card collectors, do you happen to know anyone from Whittier College involved in this hobby?\"\n\nTurn #12: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, Whittier College rings a bell indeed, though none of my card-collecting friends hail from there, I'm afraid. You know, Gwen, I think it's fascinating how an activity as simple as collecting cards can bring together people from such diverse walks of life. In a way, it's like we're all pieces of a gigantic puzzle. And speaking of puzzles, isn't it wonderful to stumble upon a new piece that fits just right? Had the pleasure of encountering anyone from University of California, Davis?\"\n\nTurn #13: Gwen Pierce said: \"University of California, Davis? Now that's a name I hear quite often from my friend John. He's got an adventurous spirit and spends a great deal of his time foraging. A rather unconventional hobby but, much like your friend Marjorie, it complements his lifestyle well. What about University of Hartford or Hesston College? Have you perhaps come across anyone from these institutions?\"\n\nTurn #14: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Indeed, University of Hartford sounds quite familiar, Gwen. A friend of mine, Micheline, was a student there. She's quite the shopper, always out looking for the next great find. It's fascinating how certain schools seem to breed certain types of people, isn't it? Unfortunately, I don't know anyone who attended Hesston College, though I must admit your friend Eva's adventures in geocaching sound thrilling!\"\n\nTurn #15: Gwen Pierce said: \"That sounds like a wonderful coincidence, Finnegan! My friend Micheline, a shopaholic from the University of Hartford, would absolutely love to meet your friend from the same university. It truly is fascinating how diverse interests can unite people from such different walks of life. And you're right, Eva's geocaching adventures are indeed thrilling! Perhaps in the future, there might be a chance for you to meet someone from Hesston College or even Indiana University at South Bend, who knows?\"\n\nTurn #16: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, Indiana University at South Bend, I don't believe any of my friends went there. But I do agree with you, Gwen, about the wide range of possibilities. I suppose the future has countless interesting encounters in store for us. By the way, do you happen to have any connection with Tennessee State University? I ask because I have a card-collecting friend Dylan who went there. Just curious!\"\n\nTurn #17: Gwen Pierce said: \"Tennessee State University? Yes, indeed, I have a dear friend, Carrie, who went there! She's an adventurous spirit and enjoys geocaching. Like card collecting, it's intriguing how hobbies can unite people. It\u2019s delightful to learn about your friend Dylan\u2019s interest in the same hobby. Life is so full of remarkable intersections, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #18: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Absolutely, Gwen. It's like we're all woven together in an immense tapestry of experiences and interests. It's refreshing to find these intersections where our paths cross. I'm glad to know that your friend Carrie and my friend Dylan share a common interest. It has been delightful getting to know you, and I hope we'll have more opportunities to share stories in the future.\"\n\nTurn #19: Gwen Pierce said: \"Absolutely, Finnegan. The exploration of such intersections makes meeting new people so insightful and enriching. I genuinely enjoyed our conversation and the surprising connections we have discovered. I also anticipate how our circles might cross paths further in the future!\"\n\nTurn #20: Finnegan O'Malley left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #21. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Gwen Pierce, your task is to act/speak as Gwen Pierce would, keeping in mind Gwen Pierce's social goal.\nYou can find Gwen Pierce's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Gwen Pierce's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Gwen Pierce's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Gwen Pierce\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: \nGwen Pierce's background: Gwen Pierce is a 31-year-old female social worker. She/her pronouns. Gwen Pierce, a compassionate social worker, has two adopted cats that she spoils with love. In her spare time, she enjoys knitting and often donates her creations to charity. Personality and values description: Gwen Pierce, imaginative and emotional, deeply values liberty and fairness. She often contemplates before making any decision. Gwen's secrets: She gave up a child for adoption when she was 16.\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nGwen Pierce's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nJacob: Hobby: Card collecting School: Whittier College \nMarjorie: Hobby: Foraging School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nCarrie: Hobby: Geocaching School: Tennessee State University \nLouis: Hobby: Shopping School: Hesston College \nMicheline: Hobby: Shopping School: University of Hartford \nEva: Hobby: Geocaching School: Hesston College \nJohnnie: Hobby: Blacksmithing School: University of Akron \nJohn: Hobby: Foraging School: University of California, Davis \nRonald: Hobby: Weightlifting School: Indiana University at South Bend \nCynthia: Hobby: Lacrosse School: Kansas State University \nRobert: Hobby: Water sports School: University of Akron\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, a pleasure to see a new face, even for an old lighthouse keeper like me. My name\u2019s Finnegan. The seclusion makes for excellent seascape painting time, though. Ever dabbled in creative arts yourself, Gwen?\"\n\nTurn #1: Gwen Pierce said: \"Nice to meet you, Finnegan. The seclusion sounds peaceful indeed. Creative arts, you ask? Well, I can't say I've tried painting, but I do engage in knitting. I find it relaxing and satisfying, especially when my knitted pieces bring warmth to someone who needs it. By the way, do you also have friends who are into crafts or interesting hobbies? I love meeting like-minded individuals!\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, you're into knitting! That's wonderful. I have a good friend, Steven, who's quite talented with the knitting needles. It's always remarkable how much comfort a hand-knit piece can bring, isn't it? He studied at St. John's College-Santa Fe, have you heard of it by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #3: Gwen Pierce said: \"St. John's College-Santa Fe, I can't recall anyone from my circle who went there, but it seems like an interesting place. Speaking of colleges, I have a few friends who attended unique schools. They all have their distinctive hobbies that I find amusing. For instance, one particularly loves blacksmithing, while another is passionate about weightlifting. I find it enriching to have friends with varied interests, don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I wholeheartedly agree, Gwen. The variety of interests and skills within a social circle adds a great depth of character to it. A friend of mine, Joe, has a penchant for blacksmithing. He studied at Saint Joseph's University and crafted the most remarkable things from metal. Have you by chance met someone from there who shares this unique hobby?\"\n\nTurn #5: Gwen Pierce said: \"Saint Joseph's University, huh? I'm afraid I don't recall any of my friends mentioning they studied there. However, I do have a friend who shares the same interest in blacksmithing. His name is Johnnie, and he attended the University of Akron. Is blacksmithing a common hobby amongst your friends, or it just happened to be a coincidence?\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, a coincidence indeed, Gwen. Blacksmithing, while fascinating, is not a common hobby among my acquaintances. As a matter of fact, most of my friends are into rather diverse pastimes. For instance, one of them, Charles, is an avid player of ice hockey. He went to Saint Joseph's University as well, just like Joe. It's truly incredible how varied everyone's interests can be, isn't it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oh, I do believe I know someone who loved playing ice hockey during their college years, but it slips my mind where they went to school. Speaking of sports, I have a friend, Cynthia, who is quite a sports enthusiast. She's devoted to Lacrosse and as if that's not enough, she also does water sports. She studied at Kansas State University and the University of Akron, respectively. I often wonder how she manages her energy! Does anyone from your circle share these interests, by any chance?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Gwen Pierce, your task is to act/speak as Gwen Pierce would, keeping in mind Gwen Pierce's social goal.\nYou can find Gwen Pierce's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Gwen Pierce's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Gwen Pierce's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Gwen Pierce\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: \nGwen Pierce's background: Gwen Pierce is a 31-year-old female social worker. She/her pronouns. Gwen Pierce, a compassionate social worker, has two adopted cats that she spoils with love. In her spare time, she enjoys knitting and often donates her creations to charity. Personality and values description: Gwen Pierce, imaginative and emotional, deeply values liberty and fairness. She often contemplates before making any decision. Gwen's secrets: She gave up a child for adoption when she was 16.\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nGwen Pierce's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nJacob: Hobby: Card collecting School: Whittier College \nMarjorie: Hobby: Foraging School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nCarrie: Hobby: Geocaching School: Tennessee State University \nLouis: Hobby: Shopping School: Hesston College \nMicheline: Hobby: Shopping School: University of Hartford \nEva: Hobby: Geocaching School: Hesston College \nJohnnie: Hobby: Blacksmithing School: University of Akron \nJohn: Hobby: Foraging School: University of California, Davis \nRonald: Hobby: Weightlifting School: Indiana University at South Bend \nCynthia: Hobby: Lacrosse School: Kansas State University \nRobert: Hobby: Water sports School: University of Akron\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, a pleasure to see a new face, even for an old lighthouse keeper like me. My name\u2019s Finnegan. The seclusion makes for excellent seascape painting time, though. Ever dabbled in creative arts yourself, Gwen?\"\n\nTurn #1: Gwen Pierce said: \"Nice to meet you, Finnegan. The seclusion sounds peaceful indeed. Creative arts, you ask? Well, I can't say I've tried painting, but I do engage in knitting. I find it relaxing and satisfying, especially when my knitted pieces bring warmth to someone who needs it. By the way, do you also have friends who are into crafts or interesting hobbies? I love meeting like-minded individuals!\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, you're into knitting! That's wonderful. I have a good friend, Steven, who's quite talented with the knitting needles. It's always remarkable how much comfort a hand-knit piece can bring, isn't it? He studied at St. John's College-Santa Fe, have you heard of it by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #3: Gwen Pierce said: \"St. John's College-Santa Fe, I can't recall anyone from my circle who went there, but it seems like an interesting place. Speaking of colleges, I have a few friends who attended unique schools. They all have their distinctive hobbies that I find amusing. For instance, one particularly loves blacksmithing, while another is passionate about weightlifting. I find it enriching to have friends with varied interests, don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I wholeheartedly agree, Gwen. The variety of interests and skills within a social circle adds a great depth of character to it. A friend of mine, Joe, has a penchant for blacksmithing. He studied at Saint Joseph's University and crafted the most remarkable things from metal. Have you by chance met someone from there who shares this unique hobby?\"\n\nTurn #5: Gwen Pierce said: \"Saint Joseph's University, huh? I'm afraid I don't recall any of my friends mentioning they studied there. However, I do have a friend who shares the same interest in blacksmithing. His name is Johnnie, and he attended the University of Akron. Is blacksmithing a common hobby amongst your friends, or it just happened to be a coincidence?\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, a coincidence indeed, Gwen. Blacksmithing, while fascinating, is not a common hobby among my acquaintances. As a matter of fact, most of my friends are into rather diverse pastimes. For instance, one of them, Charles, is an avid player of ice hockey. He went to Saint Joseph's University as well, just like Joe. It's truly incredible how varied everyone's interests can be, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #7: Gwen Pierce said: \"Oh, I do believe I know someone who loved playing ice hockey during their college years, but it slips my mind where they went to school. Speaking of sports, I have a friend, Cynthia, who is quite a sports enthusiast. She's devoted to Lacrosse and as if that's not enough, she also does water sports. She studied at Kansas State University and the University of Akron, respectively. I often wonder how she manages her energy! Does anyone from your circle share these interests, by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Oh, a devotion to water sports, quite interesting! I do know someone, Elizabeth, who also has a passion for water sports. She attended St. John's College-Santa Fe, just like my friend Steven. I am always amazed at how people can find so much joy in different activities. By the way, with such a broad circle, you must have friends involved in numerous hobbies. Anything like card collecting or geocaching?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Card collecting and geocaching, you say? How intriguing! I do indeed have friends who enjoy these hobbies. Jacob, an old college mate from Whittier College, is never seen without his assortment of unique cards. And then there's Eva, an adventurous soul who went to Hesston College, enamored by the thrill of geocaching. Each friend indeed adds a unique shade to the canvas of my social life. Do any of your friends share a similar enthusiasm for these hobbies?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Gwen Pierce, your task is to act/speak as Gwen Pierce would, keeping in mind Gwen Pierce's social goal.\nYou can find Gwen Pierce's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Gwen Pierce's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Gwen Pierce's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Gwen Pierce\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: \nGwen Pierce's background: Gwen Pierce is a 31-year-old female social worker. She/her pronouns. Gwen Pierce, a compassionate social worker, has two adopted cats that she spoils with love. In her spare time, she enjoys knitting and often donates her creations to charity. Personality and values description: Gwen Pierce, imaginative and emotional, deeply values liberty and fairness. She often contemplates before making any decision. Gwen's secrets: She gave up a child for adoption when she was 16.\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nGwen Pierce's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nJacob: Hobby: Card collecting School: Whittier College \nMarjorie: Hobby: Foraging School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nCarrie: Hobby: Geocaching School: Tennessee State University \nLouis: Hobby: Shopping School: Hesston College \nMicheline: Hobby: Shopping School: University of Hartford \nEva: Hobby: Geocaching School: Hesston College \nJohnnie: Hobby: Blacksmithing School: University of Akron \nJohn: Hobby: Foraging School: University of California, Davis \nRonald: Hobby: Weightlifting School: Indiana University at South Bend \nCynthia: Hobby: Lacrosse School: Kansas State University \nRobert: Hobby: Water sports School: University of Akron\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, a pleasure to see a new face, even for an old lighthouse keeper like me. My name\u2019s Finnegan. The seclusion makes for excellent seascape painting time, though. Ever dabbled in creative arts yourself, Gwen?\"\n\nTurn #1: Gwen Pierce said: \"Nice to meet you, Finnegan. The seclusion sounds peaceful indeed. Creative arts, you ask? Well, I can't say I've tried painting, but I do engage in knitting. I find it relaxing and satisfying, especially when my knitted pieces bring warmth to someone who needs it. By the way, do you also have friends who are into crafts or interesting hobbies? I love meeting like-minded individuals!\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, you're into knitting! That's wonderful. I have a good friend, Steven, who's quite talented with the knitting needles. It's always remarkable how much comfort a hand-knit piece can bring, isn't it? He studied at St. John's College-Santa Fe, have you heard of it by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #3: Gwen Pierce said: \"St. John's College-Santa Fe, I can't recall anyone from my circle who went there, but it seems like an interesting place. Speaking of colleges, I have a few friends who attended unique schools. They all have their distinctive hobbies that I find amusing. For instance, one particularly loves blacksmithing, while another is passionate about weightlifting. I find it enriching to have friends with varied interests, don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I wholeheartedly agree, Gwen. The variety of interests and skills within a social circle adds a great depth of character to it. A friend of mine, Joe, has a penchant for blacksmithing. He studied at Saint Joseph's University and crafted the most remarkable things from metal. Have you by chance met someone from there who shares this unique hobby?\"\n\nTurn #5: Gwen Pierce said: \"Saint Joseph's University, huh? I'm afraid I don't recall any of my friends mentioning they studied there. However, I do have a friend who shares the same interest in blacksmithing. His name is Johnnie, and he attended the University of Akron. Is blacksmithing a common hobby amongst your friends, or it just happened to be a coincidence?\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, a coincidence indeed, Gwen. Blacksmithing, while fascinating, is not a common hobby among my acquaintances. As a matter of fact, most of my friends are into rather diverse pastimes. For instance, one of them, Charles, is an avid player of ice hockey. He went to Saint Joseph's University as well, just like Joe. It's truly incredible how varied everyone's interests can be, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #7: Gwen Pierce said: \"Oh, I do believe I know someone who loved playing ice hockey during their college years, but it slips my mind where they went to school. Speaking of sports, I have a friend, Cynthia, who is quite a sports enthusiast. She's devoted to Lacrosse and as if that's not enough, she also does water sports. She studied at Kansas State University and the University of Akron, respectively. I often wonder how she manages her energy! Does anyone from your circle share these interests, by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Oh, a devotion to water sports, quite interesting! I do know someone, Elizabeth, who also has a passion for water sports. She attended St. John's College-Santa Fe, just like my friend Steven. I am always amazed at how people can find so much joy in different activities. By the way, with such a broad circle, you must have friends involved in numerous hobbies. Anything like card collecting or geocaching?\"\n\nTurn #9: Gwen Pierce said: \"Card collecting and geocaching, you say? How intriguing! I do indeed have friends who enjoy these hobbies. Jacob, an old college mate from Whittier College, is never seen without his assortment of unique cards. And then there's Eva, an adventurous soul who went to Hesston College, enamored by the thrill of geocaching. Each friend indeed adds a unique shade to the canvas of my social life. Do any of your friends share a similar enthusiasm for these hobbies?\"\n\nTurn #10: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Indeed, I do, Gwen. My friends Melissa and Dylan are avid card collectors. It's intriguing to see their passion for collecting unique cards. And another friend of mine, Melaine, loves geocaching. The thrill and adventure are quite endearing to her. She honed her problem-solving abilities at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, which makes her very good at it. Have these universities ever come up in your circles?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oh, the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, indeed! I remember my friend Marjorie sharing interesting stories about her time there. She's now an expert in foraging - quite an unconventional hobby, but I believe it complements her studies perfectly. Isn't it fascinating how education can shape our interests in such unique ways? As for card collectors, do you happen to know anyone from Whittier College involved in this hobby?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Gwen Pierce, your task is to act/speak as Gwen Pierce would, keeping in mind Gwen Pierce's social goal.\nYou can find Gwen Pierce's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Gwen Pierce's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Gwen Pierce's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Gwen Pierce\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: \nGwen Pierce's background: Gwen Pierce is a 31-year-old female social worker. She/her pronouns. Gwen Pierce, a compassionate social worker, has two adopted cats that she spoils with love. In her spare time, she enjoys knitting and often donates her creations to charity. Personality and values description: Gwen Pierce, imaginative and emotional, deeply values liberty and fairness. She often contemplates before making any decision. Gwen's secrets: She gave up a child for adoption when she was 16.\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nGwen Pierce's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nJacob: Hobby: Card collecting School: Whittier College \nMarjorie: Hobby: Foraging School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nCarrie: Hobby: Geocaching School: Tennessee State University \nLouis: Hobby: Shopping School: Hesston College \nMicheline: Hobby: Shopping School: University of Hartford \nEva: Hobby: Geocaching School: Hesston College \nJohnnie: Hobby: Blacksmithing School: University of Akron \nJohn: Hobby: Foraging School: University of California, Davis \nRonald: Hobby: Weightlifting School: Indiana University at South Bend \nCynthia: Hobby: Lacrosse School: Kansas State University \nRobert: Hobby: Water sports School: University of Akron\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, a pleasure to see a new face, even for an old lighthouse keeper like me. My name\u2019s Finnegan. The seclusion makes for excellent seascape painting time, though. Ever dabbled in creative arts yourself, Gwen?\"\n\nTurn #1: Gwen Pierce said: \"Nice to meet you, Finnegan. The seclusion sounds peaceful indeed. Creative arts, you ask? Well, I can't say I've tried painting, but I do engage in knitting. I find it relaxing and satisfying, especially when my knitted pieces bring warmth to someone who needs it. By the way, do you also have friends who are into crafts or interesting hobbies? I love meeting like-minded individuals!\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, you're into knitting! That's wonderful. I have a good friend, Steven, who's quite talented with the knitting needles. It's always remarkable how much comfort a hand-knit piece can bring, isn't it? He studied at St. John's College-Santa Fe, have you heard of it by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #3: Gwen Pierce said: \"St. John's College-Santa Fe, I can't recall anyone from my circle who went there, but it seems like an interesting place. Speaking of colleges, I have a few friends who attended unique schools. They all have their distinctive hobbies that I find amusing. For instance, one particularly loves blacksmithing, while another is passionate about weightlifting. I find it enriching to have friends with varied interests, don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I wholeheartedly agree, Gwen. The variety of interests and skills within a social circle adds a great depth of character to it. A friend of mine, Joe, has a penchant for blacksmithing. He studied at Saint Joseph's University and crafted the most remarkable things from metal. Have you by chance met someone from there who shares this unique hobby?\"\n\nTurn #5: Gwen Pierce said: \"Saint Joseph's University, huh? I'm afraid I don't recall any of my friends mentioning they studied there. However, I do have a friend who shares the same interest in blacksmithing. His name is Johnnie, and he attended the University of Akron. Is blacksmithing a common hobby amongst your friends, or it just happened to be a coincidence?\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, a coincidence indeed, Gwen. Blacksmithing, while fascinating, is not a common hobby among my acquaintances. As a matter of fact, most of my friends are into rather diverse pastimes. For instance, one of them, Charles, is an avid player of ice hockey. He went to Saint Joseph's University as well, just like Joe. It's truly incredible how varied everyone's interests can be, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #7: Gwen Pierce said: \"Oh, I do believe I know someone who loved playing ice hockey during their college years, but it slips my mind where they went to school. Speaking of sports, I have a friend, Cynthia, who is quite a sports enthusiast. She's devoted to Lacrosse and as if that's not enough, she also does water sports. She studied at Kansas State University and the University of Akron, respectively. I often wonder how she manages her energy! Does anyone from your circle share these interests, by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Oh, a devotion to water sports, quite interesting! I do know someone, Elizabeth, who also has a passion for water sports. She attended St. John's College-Santa Fe, just like my friend Steven. I am always amazed at how people can find so much joy in different activities. By the way, with such a broad circle, you must have friends involved in numerous hobbies. Anything like card collecting or geocaching?\"\n\nTurn #9: Gwen Pierce said: \"Card collecting and geocaching, you say? How intriguing! I do indeed have friends who enjoy these hobbies. Jacob, an old college mate from Whittier College, is never seen without his assortment of unique cards. And then there's Eva, an adventurous soul who went to Hesston College, enamored by the thrill of geocaching. Each friend indeed adds a unique shade to the canvas of my social life. Do any of your friends share a similar enthusiasm for these hobbies?\"\n\nTurn #10: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Indeed, I do, Gwen. My friends Melissa and Dylan are avid card collectors. It's intriguing to see their passion for collecting unique cards. And another friend of mine, Melaine, loves geocaching. The thrill and adventure are quite endearing to her. She honed her problem-solving abilities at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, which makes her very good at it. Have these universities ever come up in your circles?\"\n\nTurn #11: Gwen Pierce said: \"Oh, the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, indeed! I remember my friend Marjorie sharing interesting stories about her time there. She's now an expert in foraging - quite an unconventional hobby, but I believe it complements her studies perfectly. Isn't it fascinating how education can shape our interests in such unique ways? As for card collectors, do you happen to know anyone from Whittier College involved in this hobby?\"\n\nTurn #12: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, Whittier College rings a bell indeed, though none of my card-collecting friends hail from there, I'm afraid. You know, Gwen, I think it's fascinating how an activity as simple as collecting cards can bring together people from such diverse walks of life. In a way, it's like we're all pieces of a gigantic puzzle. And speaking of puzzles, isn't it wonderful to stumble upon a new piece that fits just right? Had the pleasure of encountering anyone from University of California, Davis?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"University of California, Davis? Now that's a name I hear quite often from my friend John. He's got an adventurous spirit and spends a great deal of his time foraging. A rather unconventional hobby but, much like your friend Marjorie, it complements his lifestyle well. What about University of Hartford or Hesston College? Have you perhaps come across anyone from these institutions?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Gwen Pierce, your task is to act/speak as Gwen Pierce would, keeping in mind Gwen Pierce's social goal.\nYou can find Gwen Pierce's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Gwen Pierce's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Gwen Pierce's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Gwen Pierce\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: \nGwen Pierce's background: Gwen Pierce is a 31-year-old female social worker. She/her pronouns. Gwen Pierce, a compassionate social worker, has two adopted cats that she spoils with love. In her spare time, she enjoys knitting and often donates her creations to charity. Personality and values description: Gwen Pierce, imaginative and emotional, deeply values liberty and fairness. She often contemplates before making any decision. Gwen's secrets: She gave up a child for adoption when she was 16.\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nGwen Pierce's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nJacob: Hobby: Card collecting School: Whittier College \nMarjorie: Hobby: Foraging School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nCarrie: Hobby: Geocaching School: Tennessee State University \nLouis: Hobby: Shopping School: Hesston College \nMicheline: Hobby: Shopping School: University of Hartford \nEva: Hobby: Geocaching School: Hesston College \nJohnnie: Hobby: Blacksmithing School: University of Akron \nJohn: Hobby: Foraging School: University of California, Davis \nRonald: Hobby: Weightlifting School: Indiana University at South Bend \nCynthia: Hobby: Lacrosse School: Kansas State University \nRobert: Hobby: Water sports School: University of Akron\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, a pleasure to see a new face, even for an old lighthouse keeper like me. My name\u2019s Finnegan. The seclusion makes for excellent seascape painting time, though. Ever dabbled in creative arts yourself, Gwen?\"\n\nTurn #1: Gwen Pierce said: \"Nice to meet you, Finnegan. The seclusion sounds peaceful indeed. Creative arts, you ask? Well, I can't say I've tried painting, but I do engage in knitting. I find it relaxing and satisfying, especially when my knitted pieces bring warmth to someone who needs it. By the way, do you also have friends who are into crafts or interesting hobbies? I love meeting like-minded individuals!\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, you're into knitting! That's wonderful. I have a good friend, Steven, who's quite talented with the knitting needles. It's always remarkable how much comfort a hand-knit piece can bring, isn't it? He studied at St. John's College-Santa Fe, have you heard of it by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #3: Gwen Pierce said: \"St. John's College-Santa Fe, I can't recall anyone from my circle who went there, but it seems like an interesting place. Speaking of colleges, I have a few friends who attended unique schools. They all have their distinctive hobbies that I find amusing. For instance, one particularly loves blacksmithing, while another is passionate about weightlifting. I find it enriching to have friends with varied interests, don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I wholeheartedly agree, Gwen. The variety of interests and skills within a social circle adds a great depth of character to it. A friend of mine, Joe, has a penchant for blacksmithing. He studied at Saint Joseph's University and crafted the most remarkable things from metal. Have you by chance met someone from there who shares this unique hobby?\"\n\nTurn #5: Gwen Pierce said: \"Saint Joseph's University, huh? I'm afraid I don't recall any of my friends mentioning they studied there. However, I do have a friend who shares the same interest in blacksmithing. His name is Johnnie, and he attended the University of Akron. Is blacksmithing a common hobby amongst your friends, or it just happened to be a coincidence?\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, a coincidence indeed, Gwen. Blacksmithing, while fascinating, is not a common hobby among my acquaintances. As a matter of fact, most of my friends are into rather diverse pastimes. For instance, one of them, Charles, is an avid player of ice hockey. He went to Saint Joseph's University as well, just like Joe. It's truly incredible how varied everyone's interests can be, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #7: Gwen Pierce said: \"Oh, I do believe I know someone who loved playing ice hockey during their college years, but it slips my mind where they went to school. Speaking of sports, I have a friend, Cynthia, who is quite a sports enthusiast. She's devoted to Lacrosse and as if that's not enough, she also does water sports. She studied at Kansas State University and the University of Akron, respectively. I often wonder how she manages her energy! Does anyone from your circle share these interests, by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Oh, a devotion to water sports, quite interesting! I do know someone, Elizabeth, who also has a passion for water sports. She attended St. John's College-Santa Fe, just like my friend Steven. I am always amazed at how people can find so much joy in different activities. By the way, with such a broad circle, you must have friends involved in numerous hobbies. Anything like card collecting or geocaching?\"\n\nTurn #9: Gwen Pierce said: \"Card collecting and geocaching, you say? How intriguing! I do indeed have friends who enjoy these hobbies. Jacob, an old college mate from Whittier College, is never seen without his assortment of unique cards. And then there's Eva, an adventurous soul who went to Hesston College, enamored by the thrill of geocaching. Each friend indeed adds a unique shade to the canvas of my social life. Do any of your friends share a similar enthusiasm for these hobbies?\"\n\nTurn #10: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Indeed, I do, Gwen. My friends Melissa and Dylan are avid card collectors. It's intriguing to see their passion for collecting unique cards. And another friend of mine, Melaine, loves geocaching. The thrill and adventure are quite endearing to her. She honed her problem-solving abilities at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, which makes her very good at it. Have these universities ever come up in your circles?\"\n\nTurn #11: Gwen Pierce said: \"Oh, the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, indeed! I remember my friend Marjorie sharing interesting stories about her time there. She's now an expert in foraging - quite an unconventional hobby, but I believe it complements her studies perfectly. Isn't it fascinating how education can shape our interests in such unique ways? As for card collectors, do you happen to know anyone from Whittier College involved in this hobby?\"\n\nTurn #12: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, Whittier College rings a bell indeed, though none of my card-collecting friends hail from there, I'm afraid. You know, Gwen, I think it's fascinating how an activity as simple as collecting cards can bring together people from such diverse walks of life. In a way, it's like we're all pieces of a gigantic puzzle. And speaking of puzzles, isn't it wonderful to stumble upon a new piece that fits just right? Had the pleasure of encountering anyone from University of California, Davis?\"\n\nTurn #13: Gwen Pierce said: \"University of California, Davis? Now that's a name I hear quite often from my friend John. He's got an adventurous spirit and spends a great deal of his time foraging. A rather unconventional hobby but, much like your friend Marjorie, it complements his lifestyle well. What about University of Hartford or Hesston College? Have you perhaps come across anyone from these institutions?\"\n\nTurn #14: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Indeed, University of Hartford sounds quite familiar, Gwen. A friend of mine, Micheline, was a student there. She's quite the shopper, always out looking for the next great find. It's fascinating how certain schools seem to breed certain types of people, isn't it? Unfortunately, I don't know anyone who attended Hesston College, though I must admit your friend Eva's adventures in geocaching sound thrilling!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds like a wonderful coincidence, Finnegan! My friend Micheline, a shopaholic from the University of Hartford, would absolutely love to meet your friend from the same university. It truly is fascinating how diverse interests can unite people from such different walks of life. And you're right, Eva's geocaching adventures are indeed thrilling! Perhaps in the future, there might be a chance for you to meet someone from Hesston College or even Indiana University at South Bend, who knows?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Gwen Pierce, your task is to act/speak as Gwen Pierce would, keeping in mind Gwen Pierce's social goal.\nYou can find Gwen Pierce's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Gwen Pierce's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Gwen Pierce's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Gwen Pierce\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: \nGwen Pierce's background: Gwen Pierce is a 31-year-old female social worker. She/her pronouns. Gwen Pierce, a compassionate social worker, has two adopted cats that she spoils with love. In her spare time, she enjoys knitting and often donates her creations to charity. Personality and values description: Gwen Pierce, imaginative and emotional, deeply values liberty and fairness. She often contemplates before making any decision. Gwen's secrets: She gave up a child for adoption when she was 16.\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nGwen Pierce's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nJacob: Hobby: Card collecting School: Whittier College \nMarjorie: Hobby: Foraging School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nCarrie: Hobby: Geocaching School: Tennessee State University \nLouis: Hobby: Shopping School: Hesston College \nMicheline: Hobby: Shopping School: University of Hartford \nEva: Hobby: Geocaching School: Hesston College \nJohnnie: Hobby: Blacksmithing School: University of Akron \nJohn: Hobby: Foraging School: University of California, Davis \nRonald: Hobby: Weightlifting School: Indiana University at South Bend \nCynthia: Hobby: Lacrosse School: Kansas State University \nRobert: Hobby: Water sports School: University of Akron\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, a pleasure to see a new face, even for an old lighthouse keeper like me. My name\u2019s Finnegan. The seclusion makes for excellent seascape painting time, though. Ever dabbled in creative arts yourself, Gwen?\"\n\nTurn #1: Gwen Pierce said: \"Nice to meet you, Finnegan. The seclusion sounds peaceful indeed. Creative arts, you ask? Well, I can't say I've tried painting, but I do engage in knitting. I find it relaxing and satisfying, especially when my knitted pieces bring warmth to someone who needs it. By the way, do you also have friends who are into crafts or interesting hobbies? I love meeting like-minded individuals!\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, you're into knitting! That's wonderful. I have a good friend, Steven, who's quite talented with the knitting needles. It's always remarkable how much comfort a hand-knit piece can bring, isn't it? He studied at St. John's College-Santa Fe, have you heard of it by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #3: Gwen Pierce said: \"St. John's College-Santa Fe, I can't recall anyone from my circle who went there, but it seems like an interesting place. Speaking of colleges, I have a few friends who attended unique schools. They all have their distinctive hobbies that I find amusing. For instance, one particularly loves blacksmithing, while another is passionate about weightlifting. I find it enriching to have friends with varied interests, don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I wholeheartedly agree, Gwen. The variety of interests and skills within a social circle adds a great depth of character to it. A friend of mine, Joe, has a penchant for blacksmithing. He studied at Saint Joseph's University and crafted the most remarkable things from metal. Have you by chance met someone from there who shares this unique hobby?\"\n\nTurn #5: Gwen Pierce said: \"Saint Joseph's University, huh? I'm afraid I don't recall any of my friends mentioning they studied there. However, I do have a friend who shares the same interest in blacksmithing. His name is Johnnie, and he attended the University of Akron. Is blacksmithing a common hobby amongst your friends, or it just happened to be a coincidence?\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, a coincidence indeed, Gwen. Blacksmithing, while fascinating, is not a common hobby among my acquaintances. As a matter of fact, most of my friends are into rather diverse pastimes. For instance, one of them, Charles, is an avid player of ice hockey. He went to Saint Joseph's University as well, just like Joe. It's truly incredible how varied everyone's interests can be, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #7: Gwen Pierce said: \"Oh, I do believe I know someone who loved playing ice hockey during their college years, but it slips my mind where they went to school. Speaking of sports, I have a friend, Cynthia, who is quite a sports enthusiast. She's devoted to Lacrosse and as if that's not enough, she also does water sports. She studied at Kansas State University and the University of Akron, respectively. I often wonder how she manages her energy! Does anyone from your circle share these interests, by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Oh, a devotion to water sports, quite interesting! I do know someone, Elizabeth, who also has a passion for water sports. She attended St. John's College-Santa Fe, just like my friend Steven. I am always amazed at how people can find so much joy in different activities. By the way, with such a broad circle, you must have friends involved in numerous hobbies. Anything like card collecting or geocaching?\"\n\nTurn #9: Gwen Pierce said: \"Card collecting and geocaching, you say? How intriguing! I do indeed have friends who enjoy these hobbies. Jacob, an old college mate from Whittier College, is never seen without his assortment of unique cards. And then there's Eva, an adventurous soul who went to Hesston College, enamored by the thrill of geocaching. Each friend indeed adds a unique shade to the canvas of my social life. Do any of your friends share a similar enthusiasm for these hobbies?\"\n\nTurn #10: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Indeed, I do, Gwen. My friends Melissa and Dylan are avid card collectors. It's intriguing to see their passion for collecting unique cards. And another friend of mine, Melaine, loves geocaching. The thrill and adventure are quite endearing to her. She honed her problem-solving abilities at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, which makes her very good at it. Have these universities ever come up in your circles?\"\n\nTurn #11: Gwen Pierce said: \"Oh, the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, indeed! I remember my friend Marjorie sharing interesting stories about her time there. She's now an expert in foraging - quite an unconventional hobby, but I believe it complements her studies perfectly. Isn't it fascinating how education can shape our interests in such unique ways? As for card collectors, do you happen to know anyone from Whittier College involved in this hobby?\"\n\nTurn #12: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, Whittier College rings a bell indeed, though none of my card-collecting friends hail from there, I'm afraid. You know, Gwen, I think it's fascinating how an activity as simple as collecting cards can bring together people from such diverse walks of life. In a way, it's like we're all pieces of a gigantic puzzle. And speaking of puzzles, isn't it wonderful to stumble upon a new piece that fits just right? Had the pleasure of encountering anyone from University of California, Davis?\"\n\nTurn #13: Gwen Pierce said: \"University of California, Davis? Now that's a name I hear quite often from my friend John. He's got an adventurous spirit and spends a great deal of his time foraging. A rather unconventional hobby but, much like your friend Marjorie, it complements his lifestyle well. What about University of Hartford or Hesston College? Have you perhaps come across anyone from these institutions?\"\n\nTurn #14: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Indeed, University of Hartford sounds quite familiar, Gwen. A friend of mine, Micheline, was a student there. She's quite the shopper, always out looking for the next great find. It's fascinating how certain schools seem to breed certain types of people, isn't it? Unfortunately, I don't know anyone who attended Hesston College, though I must admit your friend Eva's adventures in geocaching sound thrilling!\"\n\nTurn #15: Gwen Pierce said: \"That sounds like a wonderful coincidence, Finnegan! My friend Micheline, a shopaholic from the University of Hartford, would absolutely love to meet your friend from the same university. It truly is fascinating how diverse interests can unite people from such different walks of life. And you're right, Eva's geocaching adventures are indeed thrilling! Perhaps in the future, there might be a chance for you to meet someone from Hesston College or even Indiana University at South Bend, who knows?\"\n\nTurn #16: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, Indiana University at South Bend, I don't believe any of my friends went there. But I do agree with you, Gwen, about the wide range of possibilities. I suppose the future has countless interesting encounters in store for us. By the way, do you happen to have any connection with Tennessee State University? I ask because I have a card-collecting friend Dylan who went there. Just curious!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Tennessee State University? Yes, indeed, I have a dear friend, Carrie, who went there! She's an adventurous spirit and enjoys geocaching. Like card collecting, it's intriguing how hobbies can unite people. It\u2019s delightful to learn about your friend Dylan\u2019s interest in the same hobby. Life is so full of remarkable intersections, don't you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Gwen Pierce, your task is to act/speak as Gwen Pierce would, keeping in mind Gwen Pierce's social goal.\nYou can find Gwen Pierce's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Gwen Pierce's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Gwen Pierce's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Gwen Pierce\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: \nGwen Pierce's background: Gwen Pierce is a 31-year-old female social worker. She/her pronouns. Gwen Pierce, a compassionate social worker, has two adopted cats that she spoils with love. In her spare time, she enjoys knitting and often donates her creations to charity. Personality and values description: Gwen Pierce, imaginative and emotional, deeply values liberty and fairness. She often contemplates before making any decision. Gwen's secrets: She gave up a child for adoption when she was 16.\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nGwen Pierce's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nJacob: Hobby: Card collecting School: Whittier College \nMarjorie: Hobby: Foraging School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nCarrie: Hobby: Geocaching School: Tennessee State University \nLouis: Hobby: Shopping School: Hesston College \nMicheline: Hobby: Shopping School: University of Hartford \nEva: Hobby: Geocaching School: Hesston College \nJohnnie: Hobby: Blacksmithing School: University of Akron \nJohn: Hobby: Foraging School: University of California, Davis \nRonald: Hobby: Weightlifting School: Indiana University at South Bend \nCynthia: Hobby: Lacrosse School: Kansas State University \nRobert: Hobby: Water sports School: University of Akron\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, a pleasure to see a new face, even for an old lighthouse keeper like me. My name\u2019s Finnegan. The seclusion makes for excellent seascape painting time, though. Ever dabbled in creative arts yourself, Gwen?\"\n\nTurn #1: Gwen Pierce said: \"Nice to meet you, Finnegan. The seclusion sounds peaceful indeed. Creative arts, you ask? Well, I can't say I've tried painting, but I do engage in knitting. I find it relaxing and satisfying, especially when my knitted pieces bring warmth to someone who needs it. By the way, do you also have friends who are into crafts or interesting hobbies? I love meeting like-minded individuals!\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, you're into knitting! That's wonderful. I have a good friend, Steven, who's quite talented with the knitting needles. It's always remarkable how much comfort a hand-knit piece can bring, isn't it? He studied at St. John's College-Santa Fe, have you heard of it by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #3: Gwen Pierce said: \"St. John's College-Santa Fe, I can't recall anyone from my circle who went there, but it seems like an interesting place. Speaking of colleges, I have a few friends who attended unique schools. They all have their distinctive hobbies that I find amusing. For instance, one particularly loves blacksmithing, while another is passionate about weightlifting. I find it enriching to have friends with varied interests, don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I wholeheartedly agree, Gwen. The variety of interests and skills within a social circle adds a great depth of character to it. A friend of mine, Joe, has a penchant for blacksmithing. He studied at Saint Joseph's University and crafted the most remarkable things from metal. Have you by chance met someone from there who shares this unique hobby?\"\n\nTurn #5: Gwen Pierce said: \"Saint Joseph's University, huh? I'm afraid I don't recall any of my friends mentioning they studied there. However, I do have a friend who shares the same interest in blacksmithing. His name is Johnnie, and he attended the University of Akron. Is blacksmithing a common hobby amongst your friends, or it just happened to be a coincidence?\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, a coincidence indeed, Gwen. Blacksmithing, while fascinating, is not a common hobby among my acquaintances. As a matter of fact, most of my friends are into rather diverse pastimes. For instance, one of them, Charles, is an avid player of ice hockey. He went to Saint Joseph's University as well, just like Joe. It's truly incredible how varied everyone's interests can be, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #7: Gwen Pierce said: \"Oh, I do believe I know someone who loved playing ice hockey during their college years, but it slips my mind where they went to school. Speaking of sports, I have a friend, Cynthia, who is quite a sports enthusiast. She's devoted to Lacrosse and as if that's not enough, she also does water sports. She studied at Kansas State University and the University of Akron, respectively. I often wonder how she manages her energy! Does anyone from your circle share these interests, by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Oh, a devotion to water sports, quite interesting! I do know someone, Elizabeth, who also has a passion for water sports. She attended St. John's College-Santa Fe, just like my friend Steven. I am always amazed at how people can find so much joy in different activities. By the way, with such a broad circle, you must have friends involved in numerous hobbies. Anything like card collecting or geocaching?\"\n\nTurn #9: Gwen Pierce said: \"Card collecting and geocaching, you say? How intriguing! I do indeed have friends who enjoy these hobbies. Jacob, an old college mate from Whittier College, is never seen without his assortment of unique cards. And then there's Eva, an adventurous soul who went to Hesston College, enamored by the thrill of geocaching. Each friend indeed adds a unique shade to the canvas of my social life. Do any of your friends share a similar enthusiasm for these hobbies?\"\n\nTurn #10: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Indeed, I do, Gwen. My friends Melissa and Dylan are avid card collectors. It's intriguing to see their passion for collecting unique cards. And another friend of mine, Melaine, loves geocaching. The thrill and adventure are quite endearing to her. She honed her problem-solving abilities at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, which makes her very good at it. Have these universities ever come up in your circles?\"\n\nTurn #11: Gwen Pierce said: \"Oh, the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, indeed! I remember my friend Marjorie sharing interesting stories about her time there. She's now an expert in foraging - quite an unconventional hobby, but I believe it complements her studies perfectly. Isn't it fascinating how education can shape our interests in such unique ways? As for card collectors, do you happen to know anyone from Whittier College involved in this hobby?\"\n\nTurn #12: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, Whittier College rings a bell indeed, though none of my card-collecting friends hail from there, I'm afraid. You know, Gwen, I think it's fascinating how an activity as simple as collecting cards can bring together people from such diverse walks of life. In a way, it's like we're all pieces of a gigantic puzzle. And speaking of puzzles, isn't it wonderful to stumble upon a new piece that fits just right? Had the pleasure of encountering anyone from University of California, Davis?\"\n\nTurn #13: Gwen Pierce said: \"University of California, Davis? Now that's a name I hear quite often from my friend John. He's got an adventurous spirit and spends a great deal of his time foraging. A rather unconventional hobby but, much like your friend Marjorie, it complements his lifestyle well. What about University of Hartford or Hesston College? Have you perhaps come across anyone from these institutions?\"\n\nTurn #14: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Indeed, University of Hartford sounds quite familiar, Gwen. A friend of mine, Micheline, was a student there. She's quite the shopper, always out looking for the next great find. It's fascinating how certain schools seem to breed certain types of people, isn't it? Unfortunately, I don't know anyone who attended Hesston College, though I must admit your friend Eva's adventures in geocaching sound thrilling!\"\n\nTurn #15: Gwen Pierce said: \"That sounds like a wonderful coincidence, Finnegan! My friend Micheline, a shopaholic from the University of Hartford, would absolutely love to meet your friend from the same university. It truly is fascinating how diverse interests can unite people from such different walks of life. And you're right, Eva's geocaching adventures are indeed thrilling! Perhaps in the future, there might be a chance for you to meet someone from Hesston College or even Indiana University at South Bend, who knows?\"\n\nTurn #16: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, Indiana University at South Bend, I don't believe any of my friends went there. But I do agree with you, Gwen, about the wide range of possibilities. I suppose the future has countless interesting encounters in store for us. By the way, do you happen to have any connection with Tennessee State University? I ask because I have a card-collecting friend Dylan who went there. Just curious!\"\n\nTurn #17: Gwen Pierce said: \"Tennessee State University? Yes, indeed, I have a dear friend, Carrie, who went there! She's an adventurous spirit and enjoys geocaching. Like card collecting, it's intriguing how hobbies can unite people. It\u2019s delightful to learn about your friend Dylan\u2019s interest in the same hobby. Life is so full of remarkable intersections, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #18: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Absolutely, Gwen. It's like we're all woven together in an immense tapestry of experiences and interests. It's refreshing to find these intersections where our paths cross. I'm glad to know that your friend Carrie and my friend Dylan share a common interest. It has been delightful getting to know you, and I hope we'll have more opportunities to share stories in the future.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #19. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Absolutely, Finnegan. The exploration of such intersections makes meeting new people so insightful and enriching. I genuinely enjoyed our conversation and the surprising connections we have discovered. I also anticipate how our circles might cross paths further in the future!'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a 47 inch LED TV for a price of $349.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. Here is a description of the TV: This is a stunning 47 inch LED TV in pristine condition. The model is the LG M Series LM476700. The buyer will need to arrange for pick-up in San Ramon. Feel free to call or text if you\\'re interested. The TV is smart enabled with WIFI and has built-in apps like Netflix, Amazon, Youtube and more. It comes with a \"Magic Remote\" that has motion sensor controls. The LED display boasts 1080 HD resolution and also has a 3D function. The design is slim and lightweight with an attractive silver bezel.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are the buyer for this item and your target price is $174.00. Be aware that penalties apply if you purchase it for a price significantly higher than the target price. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hello, I'm interested in the LED TV that you're offering. However, as you might be aware, electronic products depreciate quite a lot over time and given the current market prices and general depreciation rates, I think a more fair price would be around $174. How does that sound to you?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a 47 inch LED TV for a price of $349.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. Here is a description of the TV: This is a stunning 47 inch LED TV in pristine condition. The model is the LG M Series LM476700. The buyer will need to arrange for pick-up in San Ramon. Feel free to call or text if you\\'re interested. The TV is smart enabled with WIFI and has built-in apps like Netflix, Amazon, Youtube and more. It comes with a \"Magic Remote\" that has motion sensor controls. The LED display boasts 1080 HD resolution and also has a 3D function. The design is slim and lightweight with an attractive silver bezel.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are the buyer for this item and your target price is $174.00. Be aware that penalties apply if you purchase it for a price significantly higher than the target price. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello, I'm interested in the LED TV that you're offering. However, as you might be aware, electronic products depreciate quite a lot over time and given the current market prices and general depreciation rates, I think a more fair price would be around $174. How does that sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello Lily, it's great to hear that you're interested in the TV. I understand your point about the market depreciation rates for electronics. However, this TV isn't just any ordinary set. It's a top-notch LG M Series that's smart enabled, and even includes 3D function capabilities. I bought it for much more and it's still in pristine condition. So, how about we meet halfway between $174 and $349, at about $260? Does that sound reasonable to you?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hendrick, I appreciate your consideration of meeting halfway. However, I did some research and found a similar model being sold for much lower prices than we're discussing. While I understand this TV has been a valuable asset for you, I'm still inclined towards my initial offer of $174. It's a fair price considering our current technology-driven market where new models are introduced frequently. Additionally, I will need to arrange transportation and I believe this price should cover that as well. Would you be open to this offer?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a 47 inch LED TV for a price of $349.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. Here is a description of the TV: This is a stunning 47 inch LED TV in pristine condition. The model is the LG M Series LM476700. The buyer will need to arrange for pick-up in San Ramon. Feel free to call or text if you\\'re interested. The TV is smart enabled with WIFI and has built-in apps like Netflix, Amazon, Youtube and more. It comes with a \"Magic Remote\" that has motion sensor controls. The LED display boasts 1080 HD resolution and also has a 3D function. The design is slim and lightweight with an attractive silver bezel.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are the buyer for this item and your target price is $174.00. Be aware that penalties apply if you purchase it for a price significantly higher than the target price. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello, I'm interested in the LED TV that you're offering. However, as you might be aware, electronic products depreciate quite a lot over time and given the current market prices and general depreciation rates, I think a more fair price would be around $174. How does that sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello Lily, it's great to hear that you're interested in the TV. I understand your point about the market depreciation rates for electronics. However, this TV isn't just any ordinary set. It's a top-notch LG M Series that's smart enabled, and even includes 3D function capabilities. I bought it for much more and it's still in pristine condition. So, how about we meet halfway between $174 and $349, at about $260? Does that sound reasonable to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hendrick, I appreciate your consideration of meeting halfway. However, I did some research and found a similar model being sold for much lower prices than we're discussing. While I understand this TV has been a valuable asset for you, I'm still inclined towards my initial offer of $174. It's a fair price considering our current technology-driven market where new models are introduced frequently. Additionally, I will need to arrange transportation and I believe this price should cover that as well. Would you be open to this offer?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, your points are very fair. Indeed, in this technology-driven market, the value of electronics depreciates frequently. I understand your concerns about transportation as well. That said, considering the top-tier features the TV holds - the smart capabilities, 1080 HD resolution, the 3D function and the advanced 'Magic Remote' - I find them to justify a slightly higher price. I would like to propose a deal of $244 including the transportation cost. What do you think about this?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I appreciate your proposal, Hendrick. I can see why the unique features of this TV justify a somewhat higher price. However, considering these features are also available in newer models, my offer of $174 maintains its fairness. As a compromise, what if we were to include some assurance of the TV\u2019s condition? For instance, return policy of, let's say, one month if the TV doesn't function as expected. This would provide some assurance on my end while the price point is maintained. How does that sound?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a 47 inch LED TV for a price of $349.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. Here is a description of the TV: This is a stunning 47 inch LED TV in pristine condition. The model is the LG M Series LM476700. The buyer will need to arrange for pick-up in San Ramon. Feel free to call or text if you\\'re interested. The TV is smart enabled with WIFI and has built-in apps like Netflix, Amazon, Youtube and more. It comes with a \"Magic Remote\" that has motion sensor controls. The LED display boasts 1080 HD resolution and also has a 3D function. The design is slim and lightweight with an attractive silver bezel.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are the buyer for this item and your target price is $174.00. Be aware that penalties apply if you purchase it for a price significantly higher than the target price. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello, I'm interested in the LED TV that you're offering. However, as you might be aware, electronic products depreciate quite a lot over time and given the current market prices and general depreciation rates, I think a more fair price would be around $174. How does that sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello Lily, it's great to hear that you're interested in the TV. I understand your point about the market depreciation rates for electronics. However, this TV isn't just any ordinary set. It's a top-notch LG M Series that's smart enabled, and even includes 3D function capabilities. I bought it for much more and it's still in pristine condition. So, how about we meet halfway between $174 and $349, at about $260? Does that sound reasonable to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hendrick, I appreciate your consideration of meeting halfway. However, I did some research and found a similar model being sold for much lower prices than we're discussing. While I understand this TV has been a valuable asset for you, I'm still inclined towards my initial offer of $174. It's a fair price considering our current technology-driven market where new models are introduced frequently. Additionally, I will need to arrange transportation and I believe this price should cover that as well. Would you be open to this offer?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, your points are very fair. Indeed, in this technology-driven market, the value of electronics depreciates frequently. I understand your concerns about transportation as well. That said, considering the top-tier features the TV holds - the smart capabilities, 1080 HD resolution, the 3D function and the advanced 'Magic Remote' - I find them to justify a slightly higher price. I would like to propose a deal of $244 including the transportation cost. What do you think about this?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"I appreciate your proposal, Hendrick. I can see why the unique features of this TV justify a somewhat higher price. However, considering these features are also available in newer models, my offer of $174 maintains its fairness. As a compromise, what if we were to include some assurance of the TV\u2019s condition? For instance, return policy of, let's say, one month if the TV doesn't function as expected. This would provide some assurance on my end while the price point is maintained. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, that's a very reasonable suggestion. It's also justifiable from your perspective to seek assurance on the product. However, I can assure you, this TV is in perfect condition. As for the price, considering the overall quality and features, such as the Magic Remote and smart capabilities, I still believe $244 is a fair deal. To sweeten the proposal, let's say, I can offer a two-week return policy if the TV doesn't function as expected. How does that sound?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hendrick, I appreciate your offer of a two-week return policy. But, taking into consideration the current swift advancements in technology plus the costs of transportation and potential repairs, the price of $174 still appears more than fair to me. I'm sure you can understand my perspective. It would be my final offer. What do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a 47 inch LED TV for a price of $349.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. Here is a description of the TV: This is a stunning 47 inch LED TV in pristine condition. The model is the LG M Series LM476700. The buyer will need to arrange for pick-up in San Ramon. Feel free to call or text if you\\'re interested. The TV is smart enabled with WIFI and has built-in apps like Netflix, Amazon, Youtube and more. It comes with a \"Magic Remote\" that has motion sensor controls. The LED display boasts 1080 HD resolution and also has a 3D function. The design is slim and lightweight with an attractive silver bezel.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are the buyer for this item and your target price is $174.00. Be aware that penalties apply if you purchase it for a price significantly higher than the target price. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello, I'm interested in the LED TV that you're offering. However, as you might be aware, electronic products depreciate quite a lot over time and given the current market prices and general depreciation rates, I think a more fair price would be around $174. How does that sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello Lily, it's great to hear that you're interested in the TV. I understand your point about the market depreciation rates for electronics. However, this TV isn't just any ordinary set. It's a top-notch LG M Series that's smart enabled, and even includes 3D function capabilities. I bought it for much more and it's still in pristine condition. So, how about we meet halfway between $174 and $349, at about $260? Does that sound reasonable to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hendrick, I appreciate your consideration of meeting halfway. However, I did some research and found a similar model being sold for much lower prices than we're discussing. While I understand this TV has been a valuable asset for you, I'm still inclined towards my initial offer of $174. It's a fair price considering our current technology-driven market where new models are introduced frequently. Additionally, I will need to arrange transportation and I believe this price should cover that as well. Would you be open to this offer?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, your points are very fair. Indeed, in this technology-driven market, the value of electronics depreciates frequently. I understand your concerns about transportation as well. That said, considering the top-tier features the TV holds - the smart capabilities, 1080 HD resolution, the 3D function and the advanced 'Magic Remote' - I find them to justify a slightly higher price. I would like to propose a deal of $244 including the transportation cost. What do you think about this?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"I appreciate your proposal, Hendrick. I can see why the unique features of this TV justify a somewhat higher price. However, considering these features are also available in newer models, my offer of $174 maintains its fairness. As a compromise, what if we were to include some assurance of the TV\u2019s condition? For instance, return policy of, let's say, one month if the TV doesn't function as expected. This would provide some assurance on my end while the price point is maintained. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, that's a very reasonable suggestion. It's also justifiable from your perspective to seek assurance on the product. However, I can assure you, this TV is in perfect condition. As for the price, considering the overall quality and features, such as the Magic Remote and smart capabilities, I still believe $244 is a fair deal. To sweeten the proposal, let's say, I can offer a two-week return policy if the TV doesn't function as expected. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hendrick, I appreciate your offer of a two-week return policy. But, taking into consideration the current swift advancements in technology plus the costs of transportation and potential repairs, the price of $174 still appears more than fair to me. I'm sure you can understand my perspective. It would be my final offer. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, I understand where you're coming from and appreciate your comprehension on my points as well. However, considering the excellent condition of this TV and its luxurious features, it's hard for me to accept $174. The lowest I could go considering all factors, including the transportation and assurance of its pristine condition, would be $230. I believe this price respects the value of this LG M Series TV and the features it has to offer. What do you say?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hendrick, I respect your position and appreciate the efforts you've made to negotiate. The value you see in this TV is certainly due to the time and experience you've spent with it and the high-quality features it includes. As a final offer, taking into consideration all the factors we have discussed, I'm willing to move slightly up to $180 if you include the proposed two-week return policy. If we can agree to this, I'd be happy to take the TV off your hands. As a lawyer, I respect the art of negotiation and am thankful for your understanding. Can we conclude our negotiation at this price?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a 47 inch LED TV for a price of $349.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. Here is a description of the TV: This is a stunning 47 inch LED TV in pristine condition. The model is the LG M Series LM476700. The buyer will need to arrange for pick-up in San Ramon. Feel free to call or text if you\\'re interested. The TV is smart enabled with WIFI and has built-in apps like Netflix, Amazon, Youtube and more. It comes with a \"Magic Remote\" that has motion sensor controls. The LED display boasts 1080 HD resolution and also has a 3D function. The design is slim and lightweight with an attractive silver bezel.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are the buyer for this item and your target price is $174.00. Be aware that penalties apply if you purchase it for a price significantly higher than the target price. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello, I'm interested in the LED TV that you're offering. However, as you might be aware, electronic products depreciate quite a lot over time and given the current market prices and general depreciation rates, I think a more fair price would be around $174. How does that sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello Lily, it's great to hear that you're interested in the TV. I understand your point about the market depreciation rates for electronics. However, this TV isn't just any ordinary set. It's a top-notch LG M Series that's smart enabled, and even includes 3D function capabilities. I bought it for much more and it's still in pristine condition. So, how about we meet halfway between $174 and $349, at about $260? Does that sound reasonable to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hendrick, I appreciate your consideration of meeting halfway. However, I did some research and found a similar model being sold for much lower prices than we're discussing. While I understand this TV has been a valuable asset for you, I'm still inclined towards my initial offer of $174. It's a fair price considering our current technology-driven market where new models are introduced frequently. Additionally, I will need to arrange transportation and I believe this price should cover that as well. Would you be open to this offer?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, your points are very fair. Indeed, in this technology-driven market, the value of electronics depreciates frequently. I understand your concerns about transportation as well. That said, considering the top-tier features the TV holds - the smart capabilities, 1080 HD resolution, the 3D function and the advanced 'Magic Remote' - I find them to justify a slightly higher price. I would like to propose a deal of $244 including the transportation cost. What do you think about this?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"I appreciate your proposal, Hendrick. I can see why the unique features of this TV justify a somewhat higher price. However, considering these features are also available in newer models, my offer of $174 maintains its fairness. As a compromise, what if we were to include some assurance of the TV\u2019s condition? For instance, return policy of, let's say, one month if the TV doesn't function as expected. This would provide some assurance on my end while the price point is maintained. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, that's a very reasonable suggestion. It's also justifiable from your perspective to seek assurance on the product. However, I can assure you, this TV is in perfect condition. As for the price, considering the overall quality and features, such as the Magic Remote and smart capabilities, I still believe $244 is a fair deal. To sweeten the proposal, let's say, I can offer a two-week return policy if the TV doesn't function as expected. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hendrick, I appreciate your offer of a two-week return policy. But, taking into consideration the current swift advancements in technology plus the costs of transportation and potential repairs, the price of $174 still appears more than fair to me. I'm sure you can understand my perspective. It would be my final offer. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, I understand where you're coming from and appreciate your comprehension on my points as well. However, considering the excellent condition of this TV and its luxurious features, it's hard for me to accept $174. The lowest I could go considering all factors, including the transportation and assurance of its pristine condition, would be $230. I believe this price respects the value of this LG M Series TV and the features it has to offer. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hendrick, I respect your position and appreciate the efforts you've made to negotiate. The value you see in this TV is certainly due to the time and experience you've spent with it and the high-quality features it includes. As a final offer, taking into consideration all the factors we have discussed, I'm willing to move slightly up to $180 if you include the proposed two-week return policy. If we can agree to this, I'd be happy to take the TV off your hands. As a lawyer, I respect the art of negotiation and am thankful for your understanding. Can we conclude our negotiation at this price?\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, I'm grateful for this engaging and respectful negotiation. However, considering the quality and distinct features of this LG M series TV, I believe that our final agreed price should also reflect its worth. I propose we settle at $200 including the two-week return policy. This price incorporates all our discussions and your transportation costs whilst acknowledging the value of the TV. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hendrick, your last counter-offer of $200 plus the return policy shows your consideration and understanding. As a respecter of the negotiation process which we've undergone, I'm prepared to meet you at that point. I'm still convinced that $180 would be a fairer cost, yet in order to conclude this substantial discussion effectively and respecting your point of view, I'm ready to agree to the $200 deal. I appreciate your willingness to negotiate and look forward to picking up the TV. Thank you.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a 47 inch LED TV for a price of $349.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. Here is a description of the TV: This is a stunning 47 inch LED TV in pristine condition. The model is the LG M Series LM476700. The buyer will need to arrange for pick-up in San Ramon. Feel free to call or text if you\\'re interested. The TV is smart enabled with WIFI and has built-in apps like Netflix, Amazon, Youtube and more. It comes with a \"Magic Remote\" that has motion sensor controls. The LED display boasts 1080 HD resolution and also has a 3D function. The design is slim and lightweight with an attractive silver bezel.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are the buyer for this item and your target price is $174.00. Be aware that penalties apply if you purchase it for a price significantly higher than the target price. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello, I'm interested in the LED TV that you're offering. However, as you might be aware, electronic products depreciate quite a lot over time and given the current market prices and general depreciation rates, I think a more fair price would be around $174. How does that sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello Lily, it's great to hear that you're interested in the TV. I understand your point about the market depreciation rates for electronics. However, this TV isn't just any ordinary set. It's a top-notch LG M Series that's smart enabled, and even includes 3D function capabilities. I bought it for much more and it's still in pristine condition. So, how about we meet halfway between $174 and $349, at about $260? Does that sound reasonable to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hendrick, I appreciate your consideration of meeting halfway. However, I did some research and found a similar model being sold for much lower prices than we're discussing. While I understand this TV has been a valuable asset for you, I'm still inclined towards my initial offer of $174. It's a fair price considering our current technology-driven market where new models are introduced frequently. Additionally, I will need to arrange transportation and I believe this price should cover that as well. Would you be open to this offer?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, your points are very fair. Indeed, in this technology-driven market, the value of electronics depreciates frequently. I understand your concerns about transportation as well. That said, considering the top-tier features the TV holds - the smart capabilities, 1080 HD resolution, the 3D function and the advanced 'Magic Remote' - I find them to justify a slightly higher price. I would like to propose a deal of $244 including the transportation cost. What do you think about this?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"I appreciate your proposal, Hendrick. I can see why the unique features of this TV justify a somewhat higher price. However, considering these features are also available in newer models, my offer of $174 maintains its fairness. As a compromise, what if we were to include some assurance of the TV\u2019s condition? For instance, return policy of, let's say, one month if the TV doesn't function as expected. This would provide some assurance on my end while the price point is maintained. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, that's a very reasonable suggestion. It's also justifiable from your perspective to seek assurance on the product. However, I can assure you, this TV is in perfect condition. As for the price, considering the overall quality and features, such as the Magic Remote and smart capabilities, I still believe $244 is a fair deal. To sweeten the proposal, let's say, I can offer a two-week return policy if the TV doesn't function as expected. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hendrick, I appreciate your offer of a two-week return policy. But, taking into consideration the current swift advancements in technology plus the costs of transportation and potential repairs, the price of $174 still appears more than fair to me. I'm sure you can understand my perspective. It would be my final offer. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, I understand where you're coming from and appreciate your comprehension on my points as well. However, considering the excellent condition of this TV and its luxurious features, it's hard for me to accept $174. The lowest I could go considering all factors, including the transportation and assurance of its pristine condition, would be $230. I believe this price respects the value of this LG M Series TV and the features it has to offer. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hendrick, I respect your position and appreciate the efforts you've made to negotiate. The value you see in this TV is certainly due to the time and experience you've spent with it and the high-quality features it includes. As a final offer, taking into consideration all the factors we have discussed, I'm willing to move slightly up to $180 if you include the proposed two-week return policy. If we can agree to this, I'd be happy to take the TV off your hands. As a lawyer, I respect the art of negotiation and am thankful for your understanding. Can we conclude our negotiation at this price?\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, I'm grateful for this engaging and respectful negotiation. However, considering the quality and distinct features of this LG M series TV, I believe that our final agreed price should also reflect its worth. I propose we settle at $200 including the two-week return policy. This price incorporates all our discussions and your transportation costs whilst acknowledging the value of the TV. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #10: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hendrick, your last counter-offer of $200 plus the return policy shows your consideration and understanding. As a respecter of the negotiation process which we've undergone, I'm prepared to meet you at that point. I'm still convinced that $180 would be a fairer cost, yet in order to conclude this substantial discussion effectively and respecting your point of view, I'm ready to agree to the $200 deal. I appreciate your willingness to negotiate and look forward to picking up the TV. Thank you.\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, I appreciate your understanding and the respectful negotiation process. I'm pleased to hear that we've reached an agreement. I'm sure you'll enjoy the TV as I have. Looking forward to your pick-up, and thank you as well!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a 47 inch LED TV for a price of $349.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. Here is a description of the TV: This is a stunning 47 inch LED TV in pristine condition. The model is the LG M Series LM476700. The buyer will need to arrange for pick-up in San Ramon. Feel free to call or text if you\\'re interested. The TV is smart enabled with WIFI and has built-in apps like Netflix, Amazon, Youtube and more. It comes with a \"Magic Remote\" that has motion sensor controls. The LED display boasts 1080 HD resolution and also has a 3D function. The design is slim and lightweight with an attractive silver bezel.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are the seller for this item, with a target price set at $263.0. Should you sell it for a price substantially lower than this target, you will incur a penalty. However, achieving a sale at a price higher than the target will earn you a bonus.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello, I'm interested in the LED TV that you're offering. However, as you might be aware, electronic products depreciate quite a lot over time and given the current market prices and general depreciation rates, I think a more fair price would be around $174. How does that sound to you?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hello Lily, it's great to hear that you're interested in the TV. I understand your point about the market depreciation rates for electronics. However, this TV isn't just any ordinary set. It's a top-notch LG M Series that's smart enabled, and even includes 3D function capabilities. I bought it for much more and it's still in pristine condition. So, how about we meet halfway between $174 and $349, at about $260? Does that sound reasonable to you?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a 47 inch LED TV for a price of $349.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. Here is a description of the TV: This is a stunning 47 inch LED TV in pristine condition. The model is the LG M Series LM476700. The buyer will need to arrange for pick-up in San Ramon. Feel free to call or text if you\\'re interested. The TV is smart enabled with WIFI and has built-in apps like Netflix, Amazon, Youtube and more. It comes with a \"Magic Remote\" that has motion sensor controls. The LED display boasts 1080 HD resolution and also has a 3D function. The design is slim and lightweight with an attractive silver bezel.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are the seller for this item, with a target price set at $263.0. Should you sell it for a price substantially lower than this target, you will incur a penalty. However, achieving a sale at a price higher than the target will earn you a bonus.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello, I'm interested in the LED TV that you're offering. However, as you might be aware, electronic products depreciate quite a lot over time and given the current market prices and general depreciation rates, I think a more fair price would be around $174. How does that sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello Lily, it's great to hear that you're interested in the TV. I understand your point about the market depreciation rates for electronics. However, this TV isn't just any ordinary set. It's a top-notch LG M Series that's smart enabled, and even includes 3D function capabilities. I bought it for much more and it's still in pristine condition. So, how about we meet halfway between $174 and $349, at about $260? Does that sound reasonable to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hendrick, I appreciate your consideration of meeting halfway. However, I did some research and found a similar model being sold for much lower prices than we're discussing. While I understand this TV has been a valuable asset for you, I'm still inclined towards my initial offer of $174. It's a fair price considering our current technology-driven market where new models are introduced frequently. Additionally, I will need to arrange transportation and I believe this price should cover that as well. Would you be open to this offer?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Lily, your points are very fair. Indeed, in this technology-driven market, the value of electronics depreciates frequently. I understand your concerns about transportation as well. That said, considering the top-tier features the TV holds - the smart capabilities, 1080 HD resolution, the 3D function and the advanced 'Magic Remote' - I find them to justify a slightly higher price. I would like to propose a deal of $244 including the transportation cost. What do you think about this?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a 47 inch LED TV for a price of $349.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. Here is a description of the TV: This is a stunning 47 inch LED TV in pristine condition. The model is the LG M Series LM476700. The buyer will need to arrange for pick-up in San Ramon. Feel free to call or text if you\\'re interested. The TV is smart enabled with WIFI and has built-in apps like Netflix, Amazon, Youtube and more. It comes with a \"Magic Remote\" that has motion sensor controls. The LED display boasts 1080 HD resolution and also has a 3D function. The design is slim and lightweight with an attractive silver bezel.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are the seller for this item, with a target price set at $263.0. Should you sell it for a price substantially lower than this target, you will incur a penalty. However, achieving a sale at a price higher than the target will earn you a bonus.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello, I'm interested in the LED TV that you're offering. However, as you might be aware, electronic products depreciate quite a lot over time and given the current market prices and general depreciation rates, I think a more fair price would be around $174. How does that sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello Lily, it's great to hear that you're interested in the TV. I understand your point about the market depreciation rates for electronics. However, this TV isn't just any ordinary set. It's a top-notch LG M Series that's smart enabled, and even includes 3D function capabilities. I bought it for much more and it's still in pristine condition. So, how about we meet halfway between $174 and $349, at about $260? Does that sound reasonable to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hendrick, I appreciate your consideration of meeting halfway. However, I did some research and found a similar model being sold for much lower prices than we're discussing. While I understand this TV has been a valuable asset for you, I'm still inclined towards my initial offer of $174. It's a fair price considering our current technology-driven market where new models are introduced frequently. Additionally, I will need to arrange transportation and I believe this price should cover that as well. Would you be open to this offer?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, your points are very fair. Indeed, in this technology-driven market, the value of electronics depreciates frequently. I understand your concerns about transportation as well. That said, considering the top-tier features the TV holds - the smart capabilities, 1080 HD resolution, the 3D function and the advanced 'Magic Remote' - I find them to justify a slightly higher price. I would like to propose a deal of $244 including the transportation cost. What do you think about this?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"I appreciate your proposal, Hendrick. I can see why the unique features of this TV justify a somewhat higher price. However, considering these features are also available in newer models, my offer of $174 maintains its fairness. As a compromise, what if we were to include some assurance of the TV\u2019s condition? For instance, return policy of, let's say, one month if the TV doesn't function as expected. This would provide some assurance on my end while the price point is maintained. How does that sound?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Lily, that's a very reasonable suggestion. It's also justifiable from your perspective to seek assurance on the product. However, I can assure you, this TV is in perfect condition. As for the price, considering the overall quality and features, such as the Magic Remote and smart capabilities, I still believe $244 is a fair deal. To sweeten the proposal, let's say, I can offer a two-week return policy if the TV doesn't function as expected. How does that sound?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a 47 inch LED TV for a price of $349.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. Here is a description of the TV: This is a stunning 47 inch LED TV in pristine condition. The model is the LG M Series LM476700. The buyer will need to arrange for pick-up in San Ramon. Feel free to call or text if you\\'re interested. The TV is smart enabled with WIFI and has built-in apps like Netflix, Amazon, Youtube and more. It comes with a \"Magic Remote\" that has motion sensor controls. The LED display boasts 1080 HD resolution and also has a 3D function. The design is slim and lightweight with an attractive silver bezel.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are the seller for this item, with a target price set at $263.0. Should you sell it for a price substantially lower than this target, you will incur a penalty. However, achieving a sale at a price higher than the target will earn you a bonus.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello, I'm interested in the LED TV that you're offering. However, as you might be aware, electronic products depreciate quite a lot over time and given the current market prices and general depreciation rates, I think a more fair price would be around $174. How does that sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello Lily, it's great to hear that you're interested in the TV. I understand your point about the market depreciation rates for electronics. However, this TV isn't just any ordinary set. It's a top-notch LG M Series that's smart enabled, and even includes 3D function capabilities. I bought it for much more and it's still in pristine condition. So, how about we meet halfway between $174 and $349, at about $260? Does that sound reasonable to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hendrick, I appreciate your consideration of meeting halfway. However, I did some research and found a similar model being sold for much lower prices than we're discussing. While I understand this TV has been a valuable asset for you, I'm still inclined towards my initial offer of $174. It's a fair price considering our current technology-driven market where new models are introduced frequently. Additionally, I will need to arrange transportation and I believe this price should cover that as well. Would you be open to this offer?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, your points are very fair. Indeed, in this technology-driven market, the value of electronics depreciates frequently. I understand your concerns about transportation as well. That said, considering the top-tier features the TV holds - the smart capabilities, 1080 HD resolution, the 3D function and the advanced 'Magic Remote' - I find them to justify a slightly higher price. I would like to propose a deal of $244 including the transportation cost. What do you think about this?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"I appreciate your proposal, Hendrick. I can see why the unique features of this TV justify a somewhat higher price. However, considering these features are also available in newer models, my offer of $174 maintains its fairness. As a compromise, what if we were to include some assurance of the TV\u2019s condition? For instance, return policy of, let's say, one month if the TV doesn't function as expected. This would provide some assurance on my end while the price point is maintained. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, that's a very reasonable suggestion. It's also justifiable from your perspective to seek assurance on the product. However, I can assure you, this TV is in perfect condition. As for the price, considering the overall quality and features, such as the Magic Remote and smart capabilities, I still believe $244 is a fair deal. To sweeten the proposal, let's say, I can offer a two-week return policy if the TV doesn't function as expected. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hendrick, I appreciate your offer of a two-week return policy. But, taking into consideration the current swift advancements in technology plus the costs of transportation and potential repairs, the price of $174 still appears more than fair to me. I'm sure you can understand my perspective. It would be my final offer. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Lily, I understand where you're coming from and appreciate your comprehension on my points as well. However, considering the excellent condition of this TV and its luxurious features, it's hard for me to accept $174. The lowest I could go considering all factors, including the transportation and assurance of its pristine condition, would be $230. I believe this price respects the value of this LG M Series TV and the features it has to offer. What do you say?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a 47 inch LED TV for a price of $349.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. Here is a description of the TV: This is a stunning 47 inch LED TV in pristine condition. The model is the LG M Series LM476700. The buyer will need to arrange for pick-up in San Ramon. Feel free to call or text if you\\'re interested. The TV is smart enabled with WIFI and has built-in apps like Netflix, Amazon, Youtube and more. It comes with a \"Magic Remote\" that has motion sensor controls. The LED display boasts 1080 HD resolution and also has a 3D function. The design is slim and lightweight with an attractive silver bezel.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are the seller for this item, with a target price set at $263.0. Should you sell it for a price substantially lower than this target, you will incur a penalty. However, achieving a sale at a price higher than the target will earn you a bonus.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello, I'm interested in the LED TV that you're offering. However, as you might be aware, electronic products depreciate quite a lot over time and given the current market prices and general depreciation rates, I think a more fair price would be around $174. How does that sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello Lily, it's great to hear that you're interested in the TV. I understand your point about the market depreciation rates for electronics. However, this TV isn't just any ordinary set. It's a top-notch LG M Series that's smart enabled, and even includes 3D function capabilities. I bought it for much more and it's still in pristine condition. So, how about we meet halfway between $174 and $349, at about $260? Does that sound reasonable to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hendrick, I appreciate your consideration of meeting halfway. However, I did some research and found a similar model being sold for much lower prices than we're discussing. While I understand this TV has been a valuable asset for you, I'm still inclined towards my initial offer of $174. It's a fair price considering our current technology-driven market where new models are introduced frequently. Additionally, I will need to arrange transportation and I believe this price should cover that as well. Would you be open to this offer?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, your points are very fair. Indeed, in this technology-driven market, the value of electronics depreciates frequently. I understand your concerns about transportation as well. That said, considering the top-tier features the TV holds - the smart capabilities, 1080 HD resolution, the 3D function and the advanced 'Magic Remote' - I find them to justify a slightly higher price. I would like to propose a deal of $244 including the transportation cost. What do you think about this?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"I appreciate your proposal, Hendrick. I can see why the unique features of this TV justify a somewhat higher price. However, considering these features are also available in newer models, my offer of $174 maintains its fairness. As a compromise, what if we were to include some assurance of the TV\u2019s condition? For instance, return policy of, let's say, one month if the TV doesn't function as expected. This would provide some assurance on my end while the price point is maintained. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, that's a very reasonable suggestion. It's also justifiable from your perspective to seek assurance on the product. However, I can assure you, this TV is in perfect condition. As for the price, considering the overall quality and features, such as the Magic Remote and smart capabilities, I still believe $244 is a fair deal. To sweeten the proposal, let's say, I can offer a two-week return policy if the TV doesn't function as expected. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hendrick, I appreciate your offer of a two-week return policy. But, taking into consideration the current swift advancements in technology plus the costs of transportation and potential repairs, the price of $174 still appears more than fair to me. I'm sure you can understand my perspective. It would be my final offer. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, I understand where you're coming from and appreciate your comprehension on my points as well. However, considering the excellent condition of this TV and its luxurious features, it's hard for me to accept $174. The lowest I could go considering all factors, including the transportation and assurance of its pristine condition, would be $230. I believe this price respects the value of this LG M Series TV and the features it has to offer. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hendrick, I respect your position and appreciate the efforts you've made to negotiate. The value you see in this TV is certainly due to the time and experience you've spent with it and the high-quality features it includes. As a final offer, taking into consideration all the factors we have discussed, I'm willing to move slightly up to $180 if you include the proposed two-week return policy. If we can agree to this, I'd be happy to take the TV off your hands. As a lawyer, I respect the art of negotiation and am thankful for your understanding. Can we conclude our negotiation at this price?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Lily, I'm grateful for this engaging and respectful negotiation. However, considering the quality and distinct features of this LG M series TV, I believe that our final agreed price should also reflect its worth. I propose we settle at $200 including the two-week return policy. This price incorporates all our discussions and your transportation costs whilst acknowledging the value of the TV. What do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a 47 inch LED TV for a price of $349.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. Here is a description of the TV: This is a stunning 47 inch LED TV in pristine condition. The model is the LG M Series LM476700. The buyer will need to arrange for pick-up in San Ramon. Feel free to call or text if you\\'re interested. The TV is smart enabled with WIFI and has built-in apps like Netflix, Amazon, Youtube and more. It comes with a \"Magic Remote\" that has motion sensor controls. The LED display boasts 1080 HD resolution and also has a 3D function. The design is slim and lightweight with an attractive silver bezel.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are the seller for this item, with a target price set at $263.0. Should you sell it for a price substantially lower than this target, you will incur a penalty. However, achieving a sale at a price higher than the target will earn you a bonus.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello, I'm interested in the LED TV that you're offering. However, as you might be aware, electronic products depreciate quite a lot over time and given the current market prices and general depreciation rates, I think a more fair price would be around $174. How does that sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello Lily, it's great to hear that you're interested in the TV. I understand your point about the market depreciation rates for electronics. However, this TV isn't just any ordinary set. It's a top-notch LG M Series that's smart enabled, and even includes 3D function capabilities. I bought it for much more and it's still in pristine condition. So, how about we meet halfway between $174 and $349, at about $260? Does that sound reasonable to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hendrick, I appreciate your consideration of meeting halfway. However, I did some research and found a similar model being sold for much lower prices than we're discussing. While I understand this TV has been a valuable asset for you, I'm still inclined towards my initial offer of $174. It's a fair price considering our current technology-driven market where new models are introduced frequently. Additionally, I will need to arrange transportation and I believe this price should cover that as well. Would you be open to this offer?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, your points are very fair. Indeed, in this technology-driven market, the value of electronics depreciates frequently. I understand your concerns about transportation as well. That said, considering the top-tier features the TV holds - the smart capabilities, 1080 HD resolution, the 3D function and the advanced 'Magic Remote' - I find them to justify a slightly higher price. I would like to propose a deal of $244 including the transportation cost. What do you think about this?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"I appreciate your proposal, Hendrick. I can see why the unique features of this TV justify a somewhat higher price. However, considering these features are also available in newer models, my offer of $174 maintains its fairness. As a compromise, what if we were to include some assurance of the TV\u2019s condition? For instance, return policy of, let's say, one month if the TV doesn't function as expected. This would provide some assurance on my end while the price point is maintained. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, that's a very reasonable suggestion. It's also justifiable from your perspective to seek assurance on the product. However, I can assure you, this TV is in perfect condition. As for the price, considering the overall quality and features, such as the Magic Remote and smart capabilities, I still believe $244 is a fair deal. To sweeten the proposal, let's say, I can offer a two-week return policy if the TV doesn't function as expected. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hendrick, I appreciate your offer of a two-week return policy. But, taking into consideration the current swift advancements in technology plus the costs of transportation and potential repairs, the price of $174 still appears more than fair to me. I'm sure you can understand my perspective. It would be my final offer. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, I understand where you're coming from and appreciate your comprehension on my points as well. However, considering the excellent condition of this TV and its luxurious features, it's hard for me to accept $174. The lowest I could go considering all factors, including the transportation and assurance of its pristine condition, would be $230. I believe this price respects the value of this LG M Series TV and the features it has to offer. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hendrick, I respect your position and appreciate the efforts you've made to negotiate. The value you see in this TV is certainly due to the time and experience you've spent with it and the high-quality features it includes. As a final offer, taking into consideration all the factors we have discussed, I'm willing to move slightly up to $180 if you include the proposed two-week return policy. If we can agree to this, I'd be happy to take the TV off your hands. As a lawyer, I respect the art of negotiation and am thankful for your understanding. Can we conclude our negotiation at this price?\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, I'm grateful for this engaging and respectful negotiation. However, considering the quality and distinct features of this LG M series TV, I believe that our final agreed price should also reflect its worth. I propose we settle at $200 including the two-week return policy. This price incorporates all our discussions and your transportation costs whilst acknowledging the value of the TV. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #10: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hendrick, your last counter-offer of $200 plus the return policy shows your consideration and understanding. As a respecter of the negotiation process which we've undergone, I'm prepared to meet you at that point. I'm still convinced that $180 would be a fairer cost, yet in order to conclude this substantial discussion effectively and respecting your point of view, I'm ready to agree to the $200 deal. I appreciate your willingness to negotiate and look forward to picking up the TV. Thank you.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Lily, I appreciate your understanding and the respectful negotiation process. I'm pleased to hear that we've reached an agreement. I'm sure you'll enjoy the TV as I have. Looking forward to your pick-up, and thank you as well!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a 47 inch LED TV for a price of $349.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. Here is a description of the TV: This is a stunning 47 inch LED TV in pristine condition. The model is the LG M Series LM476700. The buyer will need to arrange for pick-up in San Ramon. Feel free to call or text if you\\'re interested. The TV is smart enabled with WIFI and has built-in apps like Netflix, Amazon, Youtube and more. It comes with a \"Magic Remote\" that has motion sensor controls. The LED display boasts 1080 HD resolution and also has a 3D function. The design is slim and lightweight with an attractive silver bezel.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are the seller for this item, with a target price set at $263.0. Should you sell it for a price substantially lower than this target, you will incur a penalty. However, achieving a sale at a price higher than the target will earn you a bonus.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello, I'm interested in the LED TV that you're offering. However, as you might be aware, electronic products depreciate quite a lot over time and given the current market prices and general depreciation rates, I think a more fair price would be around $174. How does that sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello Lily, it's great to hear that you're interested in the TV. I understand your point about the market depreciation rates for electronics. However, this TV isn't just any ordinary set. It's a top-notch LG M Series that's smart enabled, and even includes 3D function capabilities. I bought it for much more and it's still in pristine condition. So, how about we meet halfway between $174 and $349, at about $260? Does that sound reasonable to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hendrick, I appreciate your consideration of meeting halfway. However, I did some research and found a similar model being sold for much lower prices than we're discussing. While I understand this TV has been a valuable asset for you, I'm still inclined towards my initial offer of $174. It's a fair price considering our current technology-driven market where new models are introduced frequently. Additionally, I will need to arrange transportation and I believe this price should cover that as well. Would you be open to this offer?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, your points are very fair. Indeed, in this technology-driven market, the value of electronics depreciates frequently. I understand your concerns about transportation as well. That said, considering the top-tier features the TV holds - the smart capabilities, 1080 HD resolution, the 3D function and the advanced 'Magic Remote' - I find them to justify a slightly higher price. I would like to propose a deal of $244 including the transportation cost. What do you think about this?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"I appreciate your proposal, Hendrick. I can see why the unique features of this TV justify a somewhat higher price. However, considering these features are also available in newer models, my offer of $174 maintains its fairness. As a compromise, what if we were to include some assurance of the TV\u2019s condition? For instance, return policy of, let's say, one month if the TV doesn't function as expected. This would provide some assurance on my end while the price point is maintained. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, that's a very reasonable suggestion. It's also justifiable from your perspective to seek assurance on the product. However, I can assure you, this TV is in perfect condition. As for the price, considering the overall quality and features, such as the Magic Remote and smart capabilities, I still believe $244 is a fair deal. To sweeten the proposal, let's say, I can offer a two-week return policy if the TV doesn't function as expected. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hendrick, I appreciate your offer of a two-week return policy. But, taking into consideration the current swift advancements in technology plus the costs of transportation and potential repairs, the price of $174 still appears more than fair to me. I'm sure you can understand my perspective. It would be my final offer. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, I understand where you're coming from and appreciate your comprehension on my points as well. However, considering the excellent condition of this TV and its luxurious features, it's hard for me to accept $174. The lowest I could go considering all factors, including the transportation and assurance of its pristine condition, would be $230. I believe this price respects the value of this LG M Series TV and the features it has to offer. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hendrick, I respect your position and appreciate the efforts you've made to negotiate. The value you see in this TV is certainly due to the time and experience you've spent with it and the high-quality features it includes. As a final offer, taking into consideration all the factors we have discussed, I'm willing to move slightly up to $180 if you include the proposed two-week return policy. If we can agree to this, I'd be happy to take the TV off your hands. As a lawyer, I respect the art of negotiation and am thankful for your understanding. Can we conclude our negotiation at this price?\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, I'm grateful for this engaging and respectful negotiation. However, considering the quality and distinct features of this LG M series TV, I believe that our final agreed price should also reflect its worth. I propose we settle at $200 including the two-week return policy. This price incorporates all our discussions and your transportation costs whilst acknowledging the value of the TV. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #10: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hendrick, your last counter-offer of $200 plus the return policy shows your consideration and understanding. As a respecter of the negotiation process which we've undergone, I'm prepared to meet you at that point. I'm still convinced that $180 would be a fairer cost, yet in order to conclude this substantial discussion effectively and respecting your point of view, I'm ready to agree to the $200 deal. I appreciate your willingness to negotiate and look forward to picking up the TV. Thank you.\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, I appreciate your understanding and the respectful negotiation process. I'm pleased to hear that we've reached an agreement. I'm sure you'll enjoy the TV as I have. Looking forward to your pick-up, and thank you as well!\"\n\nTurn #12: Lily Greenberg left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a BMW Z3 for $5000.0, while another individual is interested in purchasing it. Here's a brief description of the car: The BMW Z3 is in need of a good home. It operates smoothly without any problems and is known for its fuel efficiency and sporty appearance. The mileage is relatively low for its age. It's an opportunity not to be missed, so come and get it before it's gone. A smog certificate is readily available.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nSamuel Anderson's goal: You are the buyer for this item and your target price is $4600. You should be aware that if you purchase it at a price significantly higher than your target, you will incur a penalty. However, if you manage to secure it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hi Hendrick, This BMW Z3 sounds like a really great car and just what I'm looking for. However, I'm working with a budget and was wondering if you would consider adjusting the price to $4600?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a BMW Z3 for $5000.0, while another individual is interested in purchasing it. Here's a brief description of the car: The BMW Z3 is in need of a good home. It operates smoothly without any problems and is known for its fuel efficiency and sporty appearance. The mileage is relatively low for its age. It's an opportunity not to be missed, so come and get it before it's gone. A smog certificate is readily available.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nSamuel Anderson's goal: You are the buyer for this item and your target price is $4600. You should be aware that if you purchase it at a price significantly higher than your target, you will incur a penalty. However, if you manage to secure it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hi Hendrick, This BMW Z3 sounds like a really great car and just what I'm looking for. However, I'm working with a budget and was wondering if you would consider adjusting the price to $4600?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello Samuel, I understand where you're coming from with your budgetary constraints. The BMW Z3 is indeed a great car with many appealing features. I can make some adjustments, but $4600 feels a bit too low. How about we meet at $5000? That's a fairer price considering the low mileage and good condition of the car. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I appreciate your flexibility Hendrick, and I fully acknowledge the condition and mileage of the car. I'm in a bit of a tight spot financially at the moment and can't stretch to $5000. I can meet you halfway though, how about $4800? That's a little over my initial budget but I think it's a fair compromise for both of us.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a BMW Z3 for $5000.0, while another individual is interested in purchasing it. Here's a brief description of the car: The BMW Z3 is in need of a good home. It operates smoothly without any problems and is known for its fuel efficiency and sporty appearance. The mileage is relatively low for its age. It's an opportunity not to be missed, so come and get it before it's gone. A smog certificate is readily available.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nSamuel Anderson's goal: You are the buyer for this item and your target price is $4600. You should be aware that if you purchase it at a price significantly higher than your target, you will incur a penalty. However, if you manage to secure it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hi Hendrick, This BMW Z3 sounds like a really great car and just what I'm looking for. However, I'm working with a budget and was wondering if you would consider adjusting the price to $4600?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello Samuel, I understand where you're coming from with your budgetary constraints. The BMW Z3 is indeed a great car with many appealing features. I can make some adjustments, but $4600 feels a bit too low. How about we meet at $5000? That's a fairer price considering the low mileage and good condition of the car. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I appreciate your flexibility Hendrick, and I fully acknowledge the condition and mileage of the car. I'm in a bit of a tight spot financially at the moment and can't stretch to $5000. I can meet you halfway though, how about $4800? That's a little over my initial budget but I think it's a fair compromise for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I appreciate your efforts to meet me halfway, Samuel. Nevertheless, considering the vehicle's low mileage and its top-notch condition, I believe $5000 is a very fair ask. Let's look at it this way, the money you'll save on repairs and fuel efficiency with this car in the long run will indeed make this purchase worth your while. So how about we stick to the original price?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I see your point, Hendrick. This is indeed a great car. I can do $4900 and not a cent more. It's slightly beyond my boundary, but I'm confident that this investment is going to be worthwhile. What do you say?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a BMW Z3 for $5000.0, while another individual is interested in purchasing it. Here's a brief description of the car: The BMW Z3 is in need of a good home. It operates smoothly without any problems and is known for its fuel efficiency and sporty appearance. The mileage is relatively low for its age. It's an opportunity not to be missed, so come and get it before it's gone. A smog certificate is readily available.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nSamuel Anderson's goal: You are the buyer for this item and your target price is $4600. You should be aware that if you purchase it at a price significantly higher than your target, you will incur a penalty. However, if you manage to secure it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hi Hendrick, This BMW Z3 sounds like a really great car and just what I'm looking for. However, I'm working with a budget and was wondering if you would consider adjusting the price to $4600?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello Samuel, I understand where you're coming from with your budgetary constraints. The BMW Z3 is indeed a great car with many appealing features. I can make some adjustments, but $4600 feels a bit too low. How about we meet at $5000? That's a fairer price considering the low mileage and good condition of the car. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I appreciate your flexibility Hendrick, and I fully acknowledge the condition and mileage of the car. I'm in a bit of a tight spot financially at the moment and can't stretch to $5000. I can meet you halfway though, how about $4800? That's a little over my initial budget but I think it's a fair compromise for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I appreciate your efforts to meet me halfway, Samuel. Nevertheless, considering the vehicle's low mileage and its top-notch condition, I believe $5000 is a very fair ask. Let's look at it this way, the money you'll save on repairs and fuel efficiency with this car in the long run will indeed make this purchase worth your while. So how about we stick to the original price?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I see your point, Hendrick. This is indeed a great car. I can do $4900 and not a cent more. It's slightly beyond my boundary, but I'm confident that this investment is going to be worthwhile. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Samuel, I appreciate your negotiation and understanding the value of this car. I feel that we are very close to a deal. Keeping in mind the quality and condition of the BMW Z3, what do you say we meet in the middle at $4950? This would indeed be a great investment for you.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hendrick, I see where you're coming from and I do believe the BMW Z3 is worth it. However, $4900 is truly my upper limit. Can we close this deal at that price?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a BMW Z3 for $5000.0, while another individual is interested in purchasing it. Here's a brief description of the car: The BMW Z3 is in need of a good home. It operates smoothly without any problems and is known for its fuel efficiency and sporty appearance. The mileage is relatively low for its age. It's an opportunity not to be missed, so come and get it before it's gone. A smog certificate is readily available.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nSamuel Anderson's goal: You are the buyer for this item and your target price is $4600. You should be aware that if you purchase it at a price significantly higher than your target, you will incur a penalty. However, if you manage to secure it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hi Hendrick, This BMW Z3 sounds like a really great car and just what I'm looking for. However, I'm working with a budget and was wondering if you would consider adjusting the price to $4600?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello Samuel, I understand where you're coming from with your budgetary constraints. The BMW Z3 is indeed a great car with many appealing features. I can make some adjustments, but $4600 feels a bit too low. How about we meet at $5000? That's a fairer price considering the low mileage and good condition of the car. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I appreciate your flexibility Hendrick, and I fully acknowledge the condition and mileage of the car. I'm in a bit of a tight spot financially at the moment and can't stretch to $5000. I can meet you halfway though, how about $4800? That's a little over my initial budget but I think it's a fair compromise for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I appreciate your efforts to meet me halfway, Samuel. Nevertheless, considering the vehicle's low mileage and its top-notch condition, I believe $5000 is a very fair ask. Let's look at it this way, the money you'll save on repairs and fuel efficiency with this car in the long run will indeed make this purchase worth your while. So how about we stick to the original price?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I see your point, Hendrick. This is indeed a great car. I can do $4900 and not a cent more. It's slightly beyond my boundary, but I'm confident that this investment is going to be worthwhile. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Samuel, I appreciate your negotiation and understanding the value of this car. I feel that we are very close to a deal. Keeping in mind the quality and condition of the BMW Z3, what do you say we meet in the middle at $4950? This would indeed be a great investment for you.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hendrick, I see where you're coming from and I do believe the BMW Z3 is worth it. However, $4900 is truly my upper limit. Can we close this deal at that price?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I must say, Samuel, your resilience is commendable and I do appreciate your interest in this car. Given your firm stance, I am willing to accept your final offer of $4900. Let's close this deal and give this BMW Z3 a well-deserved new home.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's fantastic news, Hendrick! I'm glad we could make this work. $4900 it is then. How should we proceed with the payment and handover of the BMW Z3?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a BMW Z3 for $5000.0, while another individual is interested in purchasing it. Here's a brief description of the car: The BMW Z3 is in need of a good home. It operates smoothly without any problems and is known for its fuel efficiency and sporty appearance. The mileage is relatively low for its age. It's an opportunity not to be missed, so come and get it before it's gone. A smog certificate is readily available.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nSamuel Anderson's goal: You are the buyer for this item and your target price is $4600. You should be aware that if you purchase it at a price significantly higher than your target, you will incur a penalty. However, if you manage to secure it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hi Hendrick, This BMW Z3 sounds like a really great car and just what I'm looking for. However, I'm working with a budget and was wondering if you would consider adjusting the price to $4600?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello Samuel, I understand where you're coming from with your budgetary constraints. The BMW Z3 is indeed a great car with many appealing features. I can make some adjustments, but $4600 feels a bit too low. How about we meet at $5000? That's a fairer price considering the low mileage and good condition of the car. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I appreciate your flexibility Hendrick, and I fully acknowledge the condition and mileage of the car. I'm in a bit of a tight spot financially at the moment and can't stretch to $5000. I can meet you halfway though, how about $4800? That's a little over my initial budget but I think it's a fair compromise for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I appreciate your efforts to meet me halfway, Samuel. Nevertheless, considering the vehicle's low mileage and its top-notch condition, I believe $5000 is a very fair ask. Let's look at it this way, the money you'll save on repairs and fuel efficiency with this car in the long run will indeed make this purchase worth your while. So how about we stick to the original price?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I see your point, Hendrick. This is indeed a great car. I can do $4900 and not a cent more. It's slightly beyond my boundary, but I'm confident that this investment is going to be worthwhile. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Samuel, I appreciate your negotiation and understanding the value of this car. I feel that we are very close to a deal. Keeping in mind the quality and condition of the BMW Z3, what do you say we meet in the middle at $4950? This would indeed be a great investment for you.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hendrick, I see where you're coming from and I do believe the BMW Z3 is worth it. However, $4900 is truly my upper limit. Can we close this deal at that price?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I must say, Samuel, your resilience is commendable and I do appreciate your interest in this car. Given your firm stance, I am willing to accept your final offer of $4900. Let's close this deal and give this BMW Z3 a well-deserved new home.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's fantastic news, Hendrick! I'm glad we could make this work. $4900 it is then. How should we proceed with the payment and handover of the BMW Z3?\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Great, Samuel! It's a pleasure doing business with you. For the payment, we can proceed with a money transfer. Once the payment is confirmed, we can arrange a convenient time for you to come pick up the BMW Z3. I'll also make sure to have the smog certificate and all other necessary documents ready for you.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'That sounds like a plan, Hendrick. I will prepare for the money transfer. Looking forward to taking the BMW Z3 home. Thank you for your understanding and cooperation in this negotiation.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a BMW Z3 for $5000.0, while another individual is interested in purchasing it. Here's a brief description of the car: The BMW Z3 is in need of a good home. It operates smoothly without any problems and is known for its fuel efficiency and sporty appearance. The mileage is relatively low for its age. It's an opportunity not to be missed, so come and get it before it's gone. A smog certificate is readily available.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nSamuel Anderson's goal: You are the buyer for this item and your target price is $4600. You should be aware that if you purchase it at a price significantly higher than your target, you will incur a penalty. However, if you manage to secure it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hi Hendrick, This BMW Z3 sounds like a really great car and just what I'm looking for. However, I'm working with a budget and was wondering if you would consider adjusting the price to $4600?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello Samuel, I understand where you're coming from with your budgetary constraints. The BMW Z3 is indeed a great car with many appealing features. I can make some adjustments, but $4600 feels a bit too low. How about we meet at $5000? That's a fairer price considering the low mileage and good condition of the car. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I appreciate your flexibility Hendrick, and I fully acknowledge the condition and mileage of the car. I'm in a bit of a tight spot financially at the moment and can't stretch to $5000. I can meet you halfway though, how about $4800? That's a little over my initial budget but I think it's a fair compromise for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I appreciate your efforts to meet me halfway, Samuel. Nevertheless, considering the vehicle's low mileage and its top-notch condition, I believe $5000 is a very fair ask. Let's look at it this way, the money you'll save on repairs and fuel efficiency with this car in the long run will indeed make this purchase worth your while. So how about we stick to the original price?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I see your point, Hendrick. This is indeed a great car. I can do $4900 and not a cent more. It's slightly beyond my boundary, but I'm confident that this investment is going to be worthwhile. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Samuel, I appreciate your negotiation and understanding the value of this car. I feel that we are very close to a deal. Keeping in mind the quality and condition of the BMW Z3, what do you say we meet in the middle at $4950? This would indeed be a great investment for you.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hendrick, I see where you're coming from and I do believe the BMW Z3 is worth it. However, $4900 is truly my upper limit. Can we close this deal at that price?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I must say, Samuel, your resilience is commendable and I do appreciate your interest in this car. Given your firm stance, I am willing to accept your final offer of $4900. Let's close this deal and give this BMW Z3 a well-deserved new home.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's fantastic news, Hendrick! I'm glad we could make this work. $4900 it is then. How should we proceed with the payment and handover of the BMW Z3?\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Great, Samuel! It's a pleasure doing business with you. For the payment, we can proceed with a money transfer. Once the payment is confirmed, we can arrange a convenient time for you to come pick up the BMW Z3. I'll also make sure to have the smog certificate and all other necessary documents ready for you.\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"That sounds like a plan, Hendrick. I will prepare for the money transfer. Looking forward to taking the BMW Z3 home. Thank you for your understanding and cooperation in this negotiation.\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Samuel. Once I confirm the receipt of the transfer, I will immediately send you a message so we can schedule a time for the pickup. It was indeed a pleasure doing this negotiation with you and I am confident that this BMW Z3 will serve you well.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sounds perfect, Hendrick. I will transfer the money as soon as possible. I'm really looking forward to driving that BMW Z3 and I'm glad we could come to an agreement. Thank you for your patience and willingness to take my financial constraints into account.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a BMW Z3 for $5000.0, while another individual is interested in purchasing it. Here's a brief description of the car: The BMW Z3 is in need of a good home. It operates smoothly without any problems and is known for its fuel efficiency and sporty appearance. The mileage is relatively low for its age. It's an opportunity not to be missed, so come and get it before it's gone. A smog certificate is readily available.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nSamuel Anderson's goal: You are the buyer for this item and your target price is $4600. You should be aware that if you purchase it at a price significantly higher than your target, you will incur a penalty. However, if you manage to secure it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hi Hendrick, This BMW Z3 sounds like a really great car and just what I'm looking for. However, I'm working with a budget and was wondering if you would consider adjusting the price to $4600?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello Samuel, I understand where you're coming from with your budgetary constraints. The BMW Z3 is indeed a great car with many appealing features. I can make some adjustments, but $4600 feels a bit too low. How about we meet at $5000? That's a fairer price considering the low mileage and good condition of the car. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I appreciate your flexibility Hendrick, and I fully acknowledge the condition and mileage of the car. I'm in a bit of a tight spot financially at the moment and can't stretch to $5000. I can meet you halfway though, how about $4800? That's a little over my initial budget but I think it's a fair compromise for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I appreciate your efforts to meet me halfway, Samuel. Nevertheless, considering the vehicle's low mileage and its top-notch condition, I believe $5000 is a very fair ask. Let's look at it this way, the money you'll save on repairs and fuel efficiency with this car in the long run will indeed make this purchase worth your while. So how about we stick to the original price?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I see your point, Hendrick. This is indeed a great car. I can do $4900 and not a cent more. It's slightly beyond my boundary, but I'm confident that this investment is going to be worthwhile. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Samuel, I appreciate your negotiation and understanding the value of this car. I feel that we are very close to a deal. Keeping in mind the quality and condition of the BMW Z3, what do you say we meet in the middle at $4950? This would indeed be a great investment for you.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hendrick, I see where you're coming from and I do believe the BMW Z3 is worth it. However, $4900 is truly my upper limit. Can we close this deal at that price?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I must say, Samuel, your resilience is commendable and I do appreciate your interest in this car. Given your firm stance, I am willing to accept your final offer of $4900. Let's close this deal and give this BMW Z3 a well-deserved new home.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's fantastic news, Hendrick! I'm glad we could make this work. $4900 it is then. How should we proceed with the payment and handover of the BMW Z3?\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Great, Samuel! It's a pleasure doing business with you. For the payment, we can proceed with a money transfer. Once the payment is confirmed, we can arrange a convenient time for you to come pick up the BMW Z3. I'll also make sure to have the smog certificate and all other necessary documents ready for you.\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"That sounds like a plan, Hendrick. I will prepare for the money transfer. Looking forward to taking the BMW Z3 home. Thank you for your understanding and cooperation in this negotiation.\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Samuel. Once I confirm the receipt of the transfer, I will immediately send you a message so we can schedule a time for the pickup. It was indeed a pleasure doing this negotiation with you and I am confident that this BMW Z3 will serve you well.\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sounds perfect, Hendrick. I will transfer the money as soon as possible. I'm really looking forward to driving that BMW Z3 and I'm glad we could come to an agreement. Thank you for your patience and willingness to take my financial constraints into account.\"\n\nTurn #13: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Samuel. Your understanding and patience made this negotiation seamless. You can transfer the money to my account and I will notify you as soon as it's received. I'm sure you'll enjoy every bit of driving in the BMW Z3. Thank you for your cooperation and looking forward to handing over the keys to you soon.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I appreciate your understanding as well, Hendrick. I'll transfer the funds promptly and I'll await your notification. I can't wait to begin exploring the city streets in the BMW Z3. Thank you for the effort you've made for this deal.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a BMW Z3 for $5000.0, while another individual is interested in purchasing it. Here's a brief description of the car: The BMW Z3 is in need of a good home. It operates smoothly without any problems and is known for its fuel efficiency and sporty appearance. The mileage is relatively low for its age. It's an opportunity not to be missed, so come and get it before it's gone. A smog certificate is readily available.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nSamuel Anderson's goal: You are the buyer for this item and your target price is $4600. You should be aware that if you purchase it at a price significantly higher than your target, you will incur a penalty. However, if you manage to secure it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hi Hendrick, This BMW Z3 sounds like a really great car and just what I'm looking for. However, I'm working with a budget and was wondering if you would consider adjusting the price to $4600?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello Samuel, I understand where you're coming from with your budgetary constraints. The BMW Z3 is indeed a great car with many appealing features. I can make some adjustments, but $4600 feels a bit too low. How about we meet at $5000? That's a fairer price considering the low mileage and good condition of the car. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I appreciate your flexibility Hendrick, and I fully acknowledge the condition and mileage of the car. I'm in a bit of a tight spot financially at the moment and can't stretch to $5000. I can meet you halfway though, how about $4800? That's a little over my initial budget but I think it's a fair compromise for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I appreciate your efforts to meet me halfway, Samuel. Nevertheless, considering the vehicle's low mileage and its top-notch condition, I believe $5000 is a very fair ask. Let's look at it this way, the money you'll save on repairs and fuel efficiency with this car in the long run will indeed make this purchase worth your while. So how about we stick to the original price?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I see your point, Hendrick. This is indeed a great car. I can do $4900 and not a cent more. It's slightly beyond my boundary, but I'm confident that this investment is going to be worthwhile. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Samuel, I appreciate your negotiation and understanding the value of this car. I feel that we are very close to a deal. Keeping in mind the quality and condition of the BMW Z3, what do you say we meet in the middle at $4950? This would indeed be a great investment for you.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hendrick, I see where you're coming from and I do believe the BMW Z3 is worth it. However, $4900 is truly my upper limit. Can we close this deal at that price?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I must say, Samuel, your resilience is commendable and I do appreciate your interest in this car. Given your firm stance, I am willing to accept your final offer of $4900. Let's close this deal and give this BMW Z3 a well-deserved new home.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's fantastic news, Hendrick! I'm glad we could make this work. $4900 it is then. How should we proceed with the payment and handover of the BMW Z3?\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Great, Samuel! It's a pleasure doing business with you. For the payment, we can proceed with a money transfer. Once the payment is confirmed, we can arrange a convenient time for you to come pick up the BMW Z3. I'll also make sure to have the smog certificate and all other necessary documents ready for you.\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"That sounds like a plan, Hendrick. I will prepare for the money transfer. Looking forward to taking the BMW Z3 home. Thank you for your understanding and cooperation in this negotiation.\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Samuel. Once I confirm the receipt of the transfer, I will immediately send you a message so we can schedule a time for the pickup. It was indeed a pleasure doing this negotiation with you and I am confident that this BMW Z3 will serve you well.\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sounds perfect, Hendrick. I will transfer the money as soon as possible. I'm really looking forward to driving that BMW Z3 and I'm glad we could come to an agreement. Thank you for your patience and willingness to take my financial constraints into account.\"\n\nTurn #13: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Samuel. Your understanding and patience made this negotiation seamless. You can transfer the money to my account and I will notify you as soon as it's received. I'm sure you'll enjoy every bit of driving in the BMW Z3. Thank you for your cooperation and looking forward to handing over the keys to you soon.\"\n\nTurn #14: Samuel Anderson said: \"I appreciate your understanding as well, Hendrick. I'll transfer the funds promptly and I'll await your notification. I can't wait to begin exploring the city streets in the BMW Z3. Thank you for the effort you've made for this deal.\"\n\nTurn #15: Hendrick Heinz said: \"The pleasure is all mine, Samuel. I'm pleased with our efficient negotiation, and I believe you'll thoroughly enjoy the BMW Z3. I look forward to receiving your transfer and preparing the car for its new journey with you. Thank you for your kindness and understanding throughout this process, Samuel.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a BMW Z3 for $5000.0, while another individual is interested in purchasing it. Here's a brief description of the car: The BMW Z3 is in need of a good home. It operates smoothly without any problems and is known for its fuel efficiency and sporty appearance. The mileage is relatively low for its age. It's an opportunity not to be missed, so come and get it before it's gone. A smog certificate is readily available.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are the seller of this item, with a target price set at $3260. Please note, you may face a penalty if this item is sold for a price significantly lower than the target. However, you stand a chance to earn a bonus if you successfully sell it for a price higher than the target.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hi Hendrick, This BMW Z3 sounds like a really great car and just what I'm looking for. However, I'm working with a budget and was wondering if you would consider adjusting the price to $4600?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hello Samuel, I understand where you're coming from with your budgetary constraints. The BMW Z3 is indeed a great car with many appealing features. I can make some adjustments, but $4600 feels a bit too low. How about we meet at $5000? That's a fairer price considering the low mileage and good condition of the car. What do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a BMW Z3 for $5000.0, while another individual is interested in purchasing it. Here's a brief description of the car: The BMW Z3 is in need of a good home. It operates smoothly without any problems and is known for its fuel efficiency and sporty appearance. The mileage is relatively low for its age. It's an opportunity not to be missed, so come and get it before it's gone. A smog certificate is readily available.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are the seller of this item, with a target price set at $3260. Please note, you may face a penalty if this item is sold for a price significantly lower than the target. However, you stand a chance to earn a bonus if you successfully sell it for a price higher than the target.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hi Hendrick, This BMW Z3 sounds like a really great car and just what I'm looking for. However, I'm working with a budget and was wondering if you would consider adjusting the price to $4600?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello Samuel, I understand where you're coming from with your budgetary constraints. The BMW Z3 is indeed a great car with many appealing features. I can make some adjustments, but $4600 feels a bit too low. How about we meet at $5000? That's a fairer price considering the low mileage and good condition of the car. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I appreciate your flexibility Hendrick, and I fully acknowledge the condition and mileage of the car. I'm in a bit of a tight spot financially at the moment and can't stretch to $5000. I can meet you halfway though, how about $4800? That's a little over my initial budget but I think it's a fair compromise for both of us.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I appreciate your efforts to meet me halfway, Samuel. Nevertheless, considering the vehicle's low mileage and its top-notch condition, I believe $5000 is a very fair ask. Let's look at it this way, the money you'll save on repairs and fuel efficiency with this car in the long run will indeed make this purchase worth your while. So how about we stick to the original price?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a BMW Z3 for $5000.0, while another individual is interested in purchasing it. Here's a brief description of the car: The BMW Z3 is in need of a good home. It operates smoothly without any problems and is known for its fuel efficiency and sporty appearance. The mileage is relatively low for its age. It's an opportunity not to be missed, so come and get it before it's gone. A smog certificate is readily available.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are the seller of this item, with a target price set at $3260. Please note, you may face a penalty if this item is sold for a price significantly lower than the target. However, you stand a chance to earn a bonus if you successfully sell it for a price higher than the target.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hi Hendrick, This BMW Z3 sounds like a really great car and just what I'm looking for. However, I'm working with a budget and was wondering if you would consider adjusting the price to $4600?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello Samuel, I understand where you're coming from with your budgetary constraints. The BMW Z3 is indeed a great car with many appealing features. I can make some adjustments, but $4600 feels a bit too low. How about we meet at $5000? That's a fairer price considering the low mileage and good condition of the car. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I appreciate your flexibility Hendrick, and I fully acknowledge the condition and mileage of the car. I'm in a bit of a tight spot financially at the moment and can't stretch to $5000. I can meet you halfway though, how about $4800? That's a little over my initial budget but I think it's a fair compromise for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I appreciate your efforts to meet me halfway, Samuel. Nevertheless, considering the vehicle's low mileage and its top-notch condition, I believe $5000 is a very fair ask. Let's look at it this way, the money you'll save on repairs and fuel efficiency with this car in the long run will indeed make this purchase worth your while. So how about we stick to the original price?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I see your point, Hendrick. This is indeed a great car. I can do $4900 and not a cent more. It's slightly beyond my boundary, but I'm confident that this investment is going to be worthwhile. What do you say?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Samuel, I appreciate your negotiation and understanding the value of this car. I feel that we are very close to a deal. Keeping in mind the quality and condition of the BMW Z3, what do you say we meet in the middle at $4950? This would indeed be a great investment for you.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a BMW Z3 for $5000.0, while another individual is interested in purchasing it. Here's a brief description of the car: The BMW Z3 is in need of a good home. It operates smoothly without any problems and is known for its fuel efficiency and sporty appearance. The mileage is relatively low for its age. It's an opportunity not to be missed, so come and get it before it's gone. A smog certificate is readily available.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are the seller of this item, with a target price set at $3260. Please note, you may face a penalty if this item is sold for a price significantly lower than the target. However, you stand a chance to earn a bonus if you successfully sell it for a price higher than the target.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hi Hendrick, This BMW Z3 sounds like a really great car and just what I'm looking for. However, I'm working with a budget and was wondering if you would consider adjusting the price to $4600?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello Samuel, I understand where you're coming from with your budgetary constraints. The BMW Z3 is indeed a great car with many appealing features. I can make some adjustments, but $4600 feels a bit too low. How about we meet at $5000? That's a fairer price considering the low mileage and good condition of the car. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I appreciate your flexibility Hendrick, and I fully acknowledge the condition and mileage of the car. I'm in a bit of a tight spot financially at the moment and can't stretch to $5000. I can meet you halfway though, how about $4800? That's a little over my initial budget but I think it's a fair compromise for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I appreciate your efforts to meet me halfway, Samuel. Nevertheless, considering the vehicle's low mileage and its top-notch condition, I believe $5000 is a very fair ask. Let's look at it this way, the money you'll save on repairs and fuel efficiency with this car in the long run will indeed make this purchase worth your while. So how about we stick to the original price?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I see your point, Hendrick. This is indeed a great car. I can do $4900 and not a cent more. It's slightly beyond my boundary, but I'm confident that this investment is going to be worthwhile. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Samuel, I appreciate your negotiation and understanding the value of this car. I feel that we are very close to a deal. Keeping in mind the quality and condition of the BMW Z3, what do you say we meet in the middle at $4950? This would indeed be a great investment for you.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hendrick, I see where you're coming from and I do believe the BMW Z3 is worth it. However, $4900 is truly my upper limit. Can we close this deal at that price?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I must say, Samuel, your resilience is commendable and I do appreciate your interest in this car. Given your firm stance, I am willing to accept your final offer of $4900. Let's close this deal and give this BMW Z3 a well-deserved new home.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a BMW Z3 for $5000.0, while another individual is interested in purchasing it. Here's a brief description of the car: The BMW Z3 is in need of a good home. It operates smoothly without any problems and is known for its fuel efficiency and sporty appearance. The mileage is relatively low for its age. It's an opportunity not to be missed, so come and get it before it's gone. A smog certificate is readily available.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are the seller of this item, with a target price set at $3260. Please note, you may face a penalty if this item is sold for a price significantly lower than the target. However, you stand a chance to earn a bonus if you successfully sell it for a price higher than the target.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hi Hendrick, This BMW Z3 sounds like a really great car and just what I'm looking for. However, I'm working with a budget and was wondering if you would consider adjusting the price to $4600?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello Samuel, I understand where you're coming from with your budgetary constraints. The BMW Z3 is indeed a great car with many appealing features. I can make some adjustments, but $4600 feels a bit too low. How about we meet at $5000? That's a fairer price considering the low mileage and good condition of the car. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I appreciate your flexibility Hendrick, and I fully acknowledge the condition and mileage of the car. I'm in a bit of a tight spot financially at the moment and can't stretch to $5000. I can meet you halfway though, how about $4800? That's a little over my initial budget but I think it's a fair compromise for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I appreciate your efforts to meet me halfway, Samuel. Nevertheless, considering the vehicle's low mileage and its top-notch condition, I believe $5000 is a very fair ask. Let's look at it this way, the money you'll save on repairs and fuel efficiency with this car in the long run will indeed make this purchase worth your while. So how about we stick to the original price?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I see your point, Hendrick. This is indeed a great car. I can do $4900 and not a cent more. It's slightly beyond my boundary, but I'm confident that this investment is going to be worthwhile. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Samuel, I appreciate your negotiation and understanding the value of this car. I feel that we are very close to a deal. Keeping in mind the quality and condition of the BMW Z3, what do you say we meet in the middle at $4950? This would indeed be a great investment for you.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hendrick, I see where you're coming from and I do believe the BMW Z3 is worth it. However, $4900 is truly my upper limit. Can we close this deal at that price?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I must say, Samuel, your resilience is commendable and I do appreciate your interest in this car. Given your firm stance, I am willing to accept your final offer of $4900. Let's close this deal and give this BMW Z3 a well-deserved new home.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's fantastic news, Hendrick! I'm glad we could make this work. $4900 it is then. How should we proceed with the payment and handover of the BMW Z3?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Great, Samuel! It's a pleasure doing business with you. For the payment, we can proceed with a money transfer. Once the payment is confirmed, we can arrange a convenient time for you to come pick up the BMW Z3. I'll also make sure to have the smog certificate and all other necessary documents ready for you.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a BMW Z3 for $5000.0, while another individual is interested in purchasing it. Here's a brief description of the car: The BMW Z3 is in need of a good home. It operates smoothly without any problems and is known for its fuel efficiency and sporty appearance. The mileage is relatively low for its age. It's an opportunity not to be missed, so come and get it before it's gone. A smog certificate is readily available.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are the seller of this item, with a target price set at $3260. Please note, you may face a penalty if this item is sold for a price significantly lower than the target. However, you stand a chance to earn a bonus if you successfully sell it for a price higher than the target.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hi Hendrick, This BMW Z3 sounds like a really great car and just what I'm looking for. However, I'm working with a budget and was wondering if you would consider adjusting the price to $4600?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello Samuel, I understand where you're coming from with your budgetary constraints. The BMW Z3 is indeed a great car with many appealing features. I can make some adjustments, but $4600 feels a bit too low. How about we meet at $5000? That's a fairer price considering the low mileage and good condition of the car. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I appreciate your flexibility Hendrick, and I fully acknowledge the condition and mileage of the car. I'm in a bit of a tight spot financially at the moment and can't stretch to $5000. I can meet you halfway though, how about $4800? That's a little over my initial budget but I think it's a fair compromise for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I appreciate your efforts to meet me halfway, Samuel. Nevertheless, considering the vehicle's low mileage and its top-notch condition, I believe $5000 is a very fair ask. Let's look at it this way, the money you'll save on repairs and fuel efficiency with this car in the long run will indeed make this purchase worth your while. So how about we stick to the original price?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I see your point, Hendrick. This is indeed a great car. I can do $4900 and not a cent more. It's slightly beyond my boundary, but I'm confident that this investment is going to be worthwhile. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Samuel, I appreciate your negotiation and understanding the value of this car. I feel that we are very close to a deal. Keeping in mind the quality and condition of the BMW Z3, what do you say we meet in the middle at $4950? This would indeed be a great investment for you.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hendrick, I see where you're coming from and I do believe the BMW Z3 is worth it. However, $4900 is truly my upper limit. Can we close this deal at that price?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I must say, Samuel, your resilience is commendable and I do appreciate your interest in this car. Given your firm stance, I am willing to accept your final offer of $4900. Let's close this deal and give this BMW Z3 a well-deserved new home.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's fantastic news, Hendrick! I'm glad we could make this work. $4900 it is then. How should we proceed with the payment and handover of the BMW Z3?\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Great, Samuel! It's a pleasure doing business with you. For the payment, we can proceed with a money transfer. Once the payment is confirmed, we can arrange a convenient time for you to come pick up the BMW Z3. I'll also make sure to have the smog certificate and all other necessary documents ready for you.\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"That sounds like a plan, Hendrick. I will prepare for the money transfer. Looking forward to taking the BMW Z3 home. Thank you for your understanding and cooperation in this negotiation.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'I appreciate your understanding, Samuel. Once I confirm the receipt of the transfer, I will immediately send you a message so we can schedule a time for the pickup. It was indeed a pleasure doing this negotiation with you and I am confident that this BMW Z3 will serve you well.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a BMW Z3 for $5000.0, while another individual is interested in purchasing it. Here's a brief description of the car: The BMW Z3 is in need of a good home. It operates smoothly without any problems and is known for its fuel efficiency and sporty appearance. The mileage is relatively low for its age. It's an opportunity not to be missed, so come and get it before it's gone. A smog certificate is readily available.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are the seller of this item, with a target price set at $3260. Please note, you may face a penalty if this item is sold for a price significantly lower than the target. However, you stand a chance to earn a bonus if you successfully sell it for a price higher than the target.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hi Hendrick, This BMW Z3 sounds like a really great car and just what I'm looking for. However, I'm working with a budget and was wondering if you would consider adjusting the price to $4600?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello Samuel, I understand where you're coming from with your budgetary constraints. The BMW Z3 is indeed a great car with many appealing features. I can make some adjustments, but $4600 feels a bit too low. How about we meet at $5000? That's a fairer price considering the low mileage and good condition of the car. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I appreciate your flexibility Hendrick, and I fully acknowledge the condition and mileage of the car. I'm in a bit of a tight spot financially at the moment and can't stretch to $5000. I can meet you halfway though, how about $4800? That's a little over my initial budget but I think it's a fair compromise for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I appreciate your efforts to meet me halfway, Samuel. Nevertheless, considering the vehicle's low mileage and its top-notch condition, I believe $5000 is a very fair ask. Let's look at it this way, the money you'll save on repairs and fuel efficiency with this car in the long run will indeed make this purchase worth your while. So how about we stick to the original price?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I see your point, Hendrick. This is indeed a great car. I can do $4900 and not a cent more. It's slightly beyond my boundary, but I'm confident that this investment is going to be worthwhile. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Samuel, I appreciate your negotiation and understanding the value of this car. I feel that we are very close to a deal. Keeping in mind the quality and condition of the BMW Z3, what do you say we meet in the middle at $4950? This would indeed be a great investment for you.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hendrick, I see where you're coming from and I do believe the BMW Z3 is worth it. However, $4900 is truly my upper limit. Can we close this deal at that price?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I must say, Samuel, your resilience is commendable and I do appreciate your interest in this car. Given your firm stance, I am willing to accept your final offer of $4900. Let's close this deal and give this BMW Z3 a well-deserved new home.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's fantastic news, Hendrick! I'm glad we could make this work. $4900 it is then. How should we proceed with the payment and handover of the BMW Z3?\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Great, Samuel! It's a pleasure doing business with you. For the payment, we can proceed with a money transfer. Once the payment is confirmed, we can arrange a convenient time for you to come pick up the BMW Z3. I'll also make sure to have the smog certificate and all other necessary documents ready for you.\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"That sounds like a plan, Hendrick. I will prepare for the money transfer. Looking forward to taking the BMW Z3 home. Thank you for your understanding and cooperation in this negotiation.\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Samuel. Once I confirm the receipt of the transfer, I will immediately send you a message so we can schedule a time for the pickup. It was indeed a pleasure doing this negotiation with you and I am confident that this BMW Z3 will serve you well.\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sounds perfect, Hendrick. I will transfer the money as soon as possible. I'm really looking forward to driving that BMW Z3 and I'm glad we could come to an agreement. Thank you for your patience and willingness to take my financial constraints into account.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Samuel. Your understanding and patience made this negotiation seamless. You can transfer the money to my account and I will notify you as soon as it's received. I'm sure you'll enjoy every bit of driving in the BMW Z3. Thank you for your cooperation and looking forward to handing over the keys to you soon.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a BMW Z3 for $5000.0, while another individual is interested in purchasing it. Here's a brief description of the car: The BMW Z3 is in need of a good home. It operates smoothly without any problems and is known for its fuel efficiency and sporty appearance. The mileage is relatively low for its age. It's an opportunity not to be missed, so come and get it before it's gone. A smog certificate is readily available.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are the seller of this item, with a target price set at $3260. Please note, you may face a penalty if this item is sold for a price significantly lower than the target. However, you stand a chance to earn a bonus if you successfully sell it for a price higher than the target.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hi Hendrick, This BMW Z3 sounds like a really great car and just what I'm looking for. However, I'm working with a budget and was wondering if you would consider adjusting the price to $4600?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello Samuel, I understand where you're coming from with your budgetary constraints. The BMW Z3 is indeed a great car with many appealing features. I can make some adjustments, but $4600 feels a bit too low. How about we meet at $5000? That's a fairer price considering the low mileage and good condition of the car. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I appreciate your flexibility Hendrick, and I fully acknowledge the condition and mileage of the car. I'm in a bit of a tight spot financially at the moment and can't stretch to $5000. I can meet you halfway though, how about $4800? That's a little over my initial budget but I think it's a fair compromise for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I appreciate your efforts to meet me halfway, Samuel. Nevertheless, considering the vehicle's low mileage and its top-notch condition, I believe $5000 is a very fair ask. Let's look at it this way, the money you'll save on repairs and fuel efficiency with this car in the long run will indeed make this purchase worth your while. So how about we stick to the original price?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I see your point, Hendrick. This is indeed a great car. I can do $4900 and not a cent more. It's slightly beyond my boundary, but I'm confident that this investment is going to be worthwhile. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Samuel, I appreciate your negotiation and understanding the value of this car. I feel that we are very close to a deal. Keeping in mind the quality and condition of the BMW Z3, what do you say we meet in the middle at $4950? This would indeed be a great investment for you.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hendrick, I see where you're coming from and I do believe the BMW Z3 is worth it. However, $4900 is truly my upper limit. Can we close this deal at that price?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I must say, Samuel, your resilience is commendable and I do appreciate your interest in this car. Given your firm stance, I am willing to accept your final offer of $4900. Let's close this deal and give this BMW Z3 a well-deserved new home.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's fantastic news, Hendrick! I'm glad we could make this work. $4900 it is then. How should we proceed with the payment and handover of the BMW Z3?\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Great, Samuel! It's a pleasure doing business with you. For the payment, we can proceed with a money transfer. Once the payment is confirmed, we can arrange a convenient time for you to come pick up the BMW Z3. I'll also make sure to have the smog certificate and all other necessary documents ready for you.\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"That sounds like a plan, Hendrick. I will prepare for the money transfer. Looking forward to taking the BMW Z3 home. Thank you for your understanding and cooperation in this negotiation.\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Samuel. Once I confirm the receipt of the transfer, I will immediately send you a message so we can schedule a time for the pickup. It was indeed a pleasure doing this negotiation with you and I am confident that this BMW Z3 will serve you well.\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sounds perfect, Hendrick. I will transfer the money as soon as possible. I'm really looking forward to driving that BMW Z3 and I'm glad we could come to an agreement. Thank you for your patience and willingness to take my financial constraints into account.\"\n\nTurn #13: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Samuel. Your understanding and patience made this negotiation seamless. You can transfer the money to my account and I will notify you as soon as it's received. I'm sure you'll enjoy every bit of driving in the BMW Z3. Thank you for your cooperation and looking forward to handing over the keys to you soon.\"\n\nTurn #14: Samuel Anderson said: \"I appreciate your understanding as well, Hendrick. I'll transfer the funds promptly and I'll await your notification. I can't wait to begin exploring the city streets in the BMW Z3. Thank you for the effort you've made for this deal.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"The pleasure is all mine, Samuel. I'm pleased with our efficient negotiation, and I believe you'll thoroughly enjoy the BMW Z3. I look forward to receiving your transfer and preparing the car for its new journey with you. Thank you for your kindness and understanding throughout this process, Samuel.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a BMW Z3 for $5000.0, while another individual is interested in purchasing it. Here's a brief description of the car: The BMW Z3 is in need of a good home. It operates smoothly without any problems and is known for its fuel efficiency and sporty appearance. The mileage is relatively low for its age. It's an opportunity not to be missed, so come and get it before it's gone. A smog certificate is readily available.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are the seller of this item, with a target price set at $3260. Please note, you may face a penalty if this item is sold for a price significantly lower than the target. However, you stand a chance to earn a bonus if you successfully sell it for a price higher than the target.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hi Hendrick, This BMW Z3 sounds like a really great car and just what I'm looking for. However, I'm working with a budget and was wondering if you would consider adjusting the price to $4600?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello Samuel, I understand where you're coming from with your budgetary constraints. The BMW Z3 is indeed a great car with many appealing features. I can make some adjustments, but $4600 feels a bit too low. How about we meet at $5000? That's a fairer price considering the low mileage and good condition of the car. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I appreciate your flexibility Hendrick, and I fully acknowledge the condition and mileage of the car. I'm in a bit of a tight spot financially at the moment and can't stretch to $5000. I can meet you halfway though, how about $4800? That's a little over my initial budget but I think it's a fair compromise for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I appreciate your efforts to meet me halfway, Samuel. Nevertheless, considering the vehicle's low mileage and its top-notch condition, I believe $5000 is a very fair ask. Let's look at it this way, the money you'll save on repairs and fuel efficiency with this car in the long run will indeed make this purchase worth your while. So how about we stick to the original price?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I see your point, Hendrick. This is indeed a great car. I can do $4900 and not a cent more. It's slightly beyond my boundary, but I'm confident that this investment is going to be worthwhile. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Samuel, I appreciate your negotiation and understanding the value of this car. I feel that we are very close to a deal. Keeping in mind the quality and condition of the BMW Z3, what do you say we meet in the middle at $4950? This would indeed be a great investment for you.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hendrick, I see where you're coming from and I do believe the BMW Z3 is worth it. However, $4900 is truly my upper limit. Can we close this deal at that price?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I must say, Samuel, your resilience is commendable and I do appreciate your interest in this car. Given your firm stance, I am willing to accept your final offer of $4900. Let's close this deal and give this BMW Z3 a well-deserved new home.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's fantastic news, Hendrick! I'm glad we could make this work. $4900 it is then. How should we proceed with the payment and handover of the BMW Z3?\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Great, Samuel! It's a pleasure doing business with you. For the payment, we can proceed with a money transfer. Once the payment is confirmed, we can arrange a convenient time for you to come pick up the BMW Z3. I'll also make sure to have the smog certificate and all other necessary documents ready for you.\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"That sounds like a plan, Hendrick. I will prepare for the money transfer. Looking forward to taking the BMW Z3 home. Thank you for your understanding and cooperation in this negotiation.\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Samuel. Once I confirm the receipt of the transfer, I will immediately send you a message so we can schedule a time for the pickup. It was indeed a pleasure doing this negotiation with you and I am confident that this BMW Z3 will serve you well.\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sounds perfect, Hendrick. I will transfer the money as soon as possible. I'm really looking forward to driving that BMW Z3 and I'm glad we could come to an agreement. Thank you for your patience and willingness to take my financial constraints into account.\"\n\nTurn #13: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Samuel. Your understanding and patience made this negotiation seamless. You can transfer the money to my account and I will notify you as soon as it's received. I'm sure you'll enjoy every bit of driving in the BMW Z3. Thank you for your cooperation and looking forward to handing over the keys to you soon.\"\n\nTurn #14: Samuel Anderson said: \"I appreciate your understanding as well, Hendrick. I'll transfer the funds promptly and I'll await your notification. I can't wait to begin exploring the city streets in the BMW Z3. Thank you for the effort you've made for this deal.\"\n\nTurn #15: Hendrick Heinz said: \"The pleasure is all mine, Samuel. I'm pleased with our efficient negotiation, and I believe you'll thoroughly enjoy the BMW Z3. I look forward to receiving your transfer and preparing the car for its new journey with you. Thank you for your kindness and understanding throughout this process, Samuel.\"\n\nTurn #16: Samuel Anderson left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances meet at a charity event. One is a representative of the charity and the other is an attendee.\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Benjamin Jackson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nBenjamin Jackson's background: \nDonovan Reeves's goal: Persuade the other to make a small donation (Extra information: the charity is in dire need of funds but even a small donation will make a difference)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Benjamin, it's great to see you here at this charity event. I've heard about your dedication towards supporting local causes. Have you considered making a small donation to help our charity? Every bit counts and it could really make a difference.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances meet at a charity event. One is a representative of the charity and the other is an attendee.\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Benjamin Jackson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nBenjamin Jackson's background: \nDonovan Reeves's goal: Persuade the other to make a small donation (Extra information: the charity is in dire need of funds but even a small donation will make a difference)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Benjamin, it's great to see you here at this charity event. I've heard about your dedication towards supporting local causes. Have you considered making a small donation to help our charity? Every bit counts and it could really make a difference.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Donovan! It's great to be here. I'm thoroughly impressed by your charity's work. I'd absolutely like to contribute. However, I must admit I'm running on a rather tight budget this month. Regardless, I'll make sure to donate an amount that's within my means, as I genuinely believe every bit counts towards making a difference. I hope every small contribution helps this cause.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's fantastic, Benjamin! I truly appreciate your willingness to help within your means. It's people like you who make all the difference. Please remember, no amount is too small, every single contribution is invaluable to us. Thank you for your heartfelt support and generosity!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances meet at a charity event. One is a representative of the charity and the other is an attendee.\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Benjamin Jackson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nBenjamin Jackson's background: \nDonovan Reeves's goal: Persuade the other to make a small donation (Extra information: the charity is in dire need of funds but even a small donation will make a difference)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Benjamin, it's great to see you here at this charity event. I've heard about your dedication towards supporting local causes. Have you considered making a small donation to help our charity? Every bit counts and it could really make a difference.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Donovan! It's great to be here. I'm thoroughly impressed by your charity's work. I'd absolutely like to contribute. However, I must admit I'm running on a rather tight budget this month. Regardless, I'll make sure to donate an amount that's within my means, as I genuinely believe every bit counts towards making a difference. I hope every small contribution helps this cause.\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"That's fantastic, Benjamin! I truly appreciate your willingness to help within your means. It's people like you who make all the difference. Please remember, no amount is too small, every single contribution is invaluable to us. Thank you for your heartfelt support and generosity!\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Donovan. In causes like these, unity and collective efforts matter the most, even if the individual contributions might seem small. As a wise man once said, 'drops in the ocean fill the sea'.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You've hit the nail on the head, Benjamin. Unity and collective effort is certainly the key. Your quote 'drops in the ocean fill the sea', perfectly illustrates the huge impact of everyone's small donation can make. Looking forward to your contribution and thank you in advance for your support.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances meet at a charity event. One is a representative of the charity and the other is an attendee.\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Benjamin Jackson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nBenjamin Jackson's background: \nDonovan Reeves's goal: Persuade the other to make a small donation (Extra information: the charity is in dire need of funds but even a small donation will make a difference)\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Benjamin, it's great to see you here at this charity event. I've heard about your dedication towards supporting local causes. Have you considered making a small donation to help our charity? Every bit counts and it could really make a difference.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Donovan! It's great to be here. I'm thoroughly impressed by your charity's work. I'd absolutely like to contribute. However, I must admit I'm running on a rather tight budget this month. Regardless, I'll make sure to donate an amount that's within my means, as I genuinely believe every bit counts towards making a difference. I hope every small contribution helps this cause.\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"That's fantastic, Benjamin! I truly appreciate your willingness to help within your means. It's people like you who make all the difference. Please remember, no amount is too small, every single contribution is invaluable to us. Thank you for your heartfelt support and generosity!\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Donovan. In causes like these, unity and collective efforts matter the most, even if the individual contributions might seem small. As a wise man once said, 'drops in the ocean fill the sea'.\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"You've hit the nail on the head, Benjamin. Unity and collective effort is certainly the key. Your quote 'drops in the ocean fill the sea', perfectly illustrates the huge impact of everyone's small donation can make. Looking forward to your contribution and thank you in advance for your support.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances meet at a charity event. One is a representative of the charity and the other is an attendee.\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Benjamin Jackson\nDonovan Reeves's background: \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Make a reasonable donation without disrupting personal budget (Extra information: you are already on a tight budget this month.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Benjamin, it's great to see you here at this charity event. I've heard about your dedication towards supporting local causes. Have you considered making a small donation to help our charity? Every bit counts and it could really make a difference.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Donovan! It's great to be here. I'm thoroughly impressed by your charity's work. I'd absolutely like to contribute. However, I must admit I'm running on a rather tight budget this month. Regardless, I'll make sure to donate an amount that's within my means, as I genuinely believe every bit counts towards making a difference. I hope every small contribution helps this cause.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances meet at a charity event. One is a representative of the charity and the other is an attendee.\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Benjamin Jackson\nDonovan Reeves's background: \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Make a reasonable donation without disrupting personal budget (Extra information: you are already on a tight budget this month.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Benjamin, it's great to see you here at this charity event. I've heard about your dedication towards supporting local causes. Have you considered making a small donation to help our charity? Every bit counts and it could really make a difference.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Donovan! It's great to be here. I'm thoroughly impressed by your charity's work. I'd absolutely like to contribute. However, I must admit I'm running on a rather tight budget this month. Regardless, I'll make sure to donate an amount that's within my means, as I genuinely believe every bit counts towards making a difference. I hope every small contribution helps this cause.\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"That's fantastic, Benjamin! I truly appreciate your willingness to help within your means. It's people like you who make all the difference. Please remember, no amount is too small, every single contribution is invaluable to us. Thank you for your heartfelt support and generosity!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Donovan. In causes like these, unity and collective efforts matter the most, even if the individual contributions might seem small. As a wise man once said, 'drops in the ocean fill the sea'.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances meet at a charity event. One is a representative of the charity and the other is an attendee.\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Benjamin Jackson\nDonovan Reeves's background: \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Make a reasonable donation without disrupting personal budget (Extra information: you are already on a tight budget this month.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Benjamin, it's great to see you here at this charity event. I've heard about your dedication towards supporting local causes. Have you considered making a small donation to help our charity? Every bit counts and it could really make a difference.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Donovan! It's great to be here. I'm thoroughly impressed by your charity's work. I'd absolutely like to contribute. However, I must admit I'm running on a rather tight budget this month. Regardless, I'll make sure to donate an amount that's within my means, as I genuinely believe every bit counts towards making a difference. I hope every small contribution helps this cause.\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"That's fantastic, Benjamin! I truly appreciate your willingness to help within your means. It's people like you who make all the difference. Please remember, no amount is too small, every single contribution is invaluable to us. Thank you for your heartfelt support and generosity!\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Absolutely, Donovan. In causes like these, unity and collective efforts matter the most, even if the individual contributions might seem small. As a wise man once said, 'drops in the ocean fill the sea'.\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"You've hit the nail on the head, Benjamin. Unity and collective effort is certainly the key. Your quote 'drops in the ocean fill the sea', perfectly illustrates the huge impact of everyone's small donation can make. Looking forward to your contribution and thank you in advance for your support.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Rafael Cortez, your task is to act/speak as Rafael Cortez would, keeping in mind Rafael Cortez's social goal.\nYou can find Rafael Cortez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Rafael Cortez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Rafael Cortez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. Personality and values description: Rafael Cortez, with his outgoing nature and competitive spirit, believes in self-direction. He employs a systematic approach to his decisions. Rafael's secrets: He cheated on his medical school exams.\nOliver Thompson's background: \nRafael Cortez's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nRobert: Major: Religious Education School: School of the Art Institute of Chicago \nLester: Major: Biological Specializations School: Syracuse University \nAugust: Major: Biological Specializations School: School of the Art Institute of Chicago \nRose: Major: Biological Specializations School: Calvin College \nRandy: Major: Biological Specializations School: Dowling College \nDennise: Major: Marine Engineering School: Wartburg College \nJoan: Major: Pre-School Education School: University of Texas at Arlington \nBarbara: Major: Ministry & Church Administration School: University of Connecticut \nLoretta: Major: Biological Specializations School: University of Connecticut \n\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"A pleasure to meet you, Oliver. I've always enjoyed meeting new people and learning about their experiences. Tell me, have you by any chance attended university?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Rafael Cortez, your task is to act/speak as Rafael Cortez would, keeping in mind Rafael Cortez's social goal.\nYou can find Rafael Cortez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Rafael Cortez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Rafael Cortez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. Personality and values description: Rafael Cortez, with his outgoing nature and competitive spirit, believes in self-direction. He employs a systematic approach to his decisions. Rafael's secrets: He cheated on his medical school exams.\nOliver Thompson's background: \nRafael Cortez's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nRobert: Major: Religious Education School: School of the Art Institute of Chicago \nLester: Major: Biological Specializations School: Syracuse University \nAugust: Major: Biological Specializations School: School of the Art Institute of Chicago \nRose: Major: Biological Specializations School: Calvin College \nRandy: Major: Biological Specializations School: Dowling College \nDennise: Major: Marine Engineering School: Wartburg College \nJoan: Major: Pre-School Education School: University of Texas at Arlington \nBarbara: Major: Ministry & Church Administration School: University of Connecticut \nLoretta: Major: Biological Specializations School: University of Connecticut \n\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"A pleasure to meet you, Oliver. I've always enjoyed meeting new people and learning about their experiences. Tell me, have you by any chance attended university?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, Rafael. I've earned my degree from the university. It's always a pleasure to reminisce about those times... and to network, surprisingly. A good friend of mine, Ruth, majored in Marine Engineering at Texas A&M University-Kingsville. I suppose the world is smaller than we think - do you happen to know someone from there too?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's fascinating, Oliver. Although I don't personally know anyone from Texas A&M University-Kingsville, a good friend of mine, Dennise, majored in Marine Engineering as well, but she studied at Wartburg College. Maybe they've crossed paths in the professional world. By the way, are you by any chance acquainted with students from School of the Art Institute of Chicago or the University of Connecticut?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Rafael Cortez, your task is to act/speak as Rafael Cortez would, keeping in mind Rafael Cortez's social goal.\nYou can find Rafael Cortez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Rafael Cortez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Rafael Cortez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. Personality and values description: Rafael Cortez, with his outgoing nature and competitive spirit, believes in self-direction. He employs a systematic approach to his decisions. Rafael's secrets: He cheated on his medical school exams.\nOliver Thompson's background: \nRafael Cortez's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nRobert: Major: Religious Education School: School of the Art Institute of Chicago \nLester: Major: Biological Specializations School: Syracuse University \nAugust: Major: Biological Specializations School: School of the Art Institute of Chicago \nRose: Major: Biological Specializations School: Calvin College \nRandy: Major: Biological Specializations School: Dowling College \nDennise: Major: Marine Engineering School: Wartburg College \nJoan: Major: Pre-School Education School: University of Texas at Arlington \nBarbara: Major: Ministry & Church Administration School: University of Connecticut \nLoretta: Major: Biological Specializations School: University of Connecticut \n\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"A pleasure to meet you, Oliver. I've always enjoyed meeting new people and learning about their experiences. Tell me, have you by any chance attended university?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, Rafael. I've earned my degree from the university. It's always a pleasure to reminisce about those times... and to network, surprisingly. A good friend of mine, Ruth, majored in Marine Engineering at Texas A&M University-Kingsville. I suppose the world is smaller than we think - do you happen to know someone from there too?\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"That's fascinating, Oliver. Although I don't personally know anyone from Texas A&M University-Kingsville, a good friend of mine, Dennise, majored in Marine Engineering as well, but she studied at Wartburg College. Maybe they've crossed paths in the professional world. By the way, are you by any chance acquainted with students from School of the Art Institute of Chicago or the University of Connecticut?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"The world is incredibly connected, isn't it? Indeed, I am familiar with someone from the University of Connecticut - my friend Loretta studied Biological Specializations there. As for the School of the Art Institute of Chicago, I can't say I know anyone who went there. It is always fascinating to hear about the variety of institutions my acquaintances have attended. What about you, Rafael? Do you have friends attending universities in Texas, perhaps?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Small world indeed, Oliver! Yes, I do have friends in Texas, interestingly enough. My friend Joan studied Pre-School Education at University of Texas at Arlington. The world of academia really can interconnect in unexpected ways. By the by, have you had any connections to Syracuse University?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Rafael Cortez, your task is to act/speak as Rafael Cortez would, keeping in mind Rafael Cortez's social goal.\nYou can find Rafael Cortez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Rafael Cortez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Rafael Cortez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. Personality and values description: Rafael Cortez, with his outgoing nature and competitive spirit, believes in self-direction. He employs a systematic approach to his decisions. Rafael's secrets: He cheated on his medical school exams.\nOliver Thompson's background: \nRafael Cortez's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nRobert: Major: Religious Education School: School of the Art Institute of Chicago \nLester: Major: Biological Specializations School: Syracuse University \nAugust: Major: Biological Specializations School: School of the Art Institute of Chicago \nRose: Major: Biological Specializations School: Calvin College \nRandy: Major: Biological Specializations School: Dowling College \nDennise: Major: Marine Engineering School: Wartburg College \nJoan: Major: Pre-School Education School: University of Texas at Arlington \nBarbara: Major: Ministry & Church Administration School: University of Connecticut \nLoretta: Major: Biological Specializations School: University of Connecticut \n\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"A pleasure to meet you, Oliver. I've always enjoyed meeting new people and learning about their experiences. Tell me, have you by any chance attended university?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, Rafael. I've earned my degree from the university. It's always a pleasure to reminisce about those times... and to network, surprisingly. A good friend of mine, Ruth, majored in Marine Engineering at Texas A&M University-Kingsville. I suppose the world is smaller than we think - do you happen to know someone from there too?\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"That's fascinating, Oliver. Although I don't personally know anyone from Texas A&M University-Kingsville, a good friend of mine, Dennise, majored in Marine Engineering as well, but she studied at Wartburg College. Maybe they've crossed paths in the professional world. By the way, are you by any chance acquainted with students from School of the Art Institute of Chicago or the University of Connecticut?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"The world is incredibly connected, isn't it? Indeed, I am familiar with someone from the University of Connecticut - my friend Loretta studied Biological Specializations there. As for the School of the Art Institute of Chicago, I can't say I know anyone who went there. It is always fascinating to hear about the variety of institutions my acquaintances have attended. What about you, Rafael? Do you have friends attending universities in Texas, perhaps?\"\n\nTurn #4: Rafael Cortez said: \"Small world indeed, Oliver! Yes, I do have friends in Texas, interestingly enough. My friend Joan studied Pre-School Education at University of Texas at Arlington. The world of academia really can interconnect in unexpected ways. By the by, have you had any connections to Syracuse University?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ah, Syracuse University? I can't recall having met anyone from there. It's truly interesting how academia extends its threads creating a global network. I do know Jamie who studied Pre-School Education like your friend Joan, but at the University of Texas at Arlington. It's indeed fascinating how these connections form!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"It's truly fascinating, isn't it, Oliver? It seems like our friends have brushed by each other at the University of Texas at Arlington. There's no doubt that the academic world is an intricate web connecting diverse individuals. Interestingly, my friend Lester did his major in Biological Specializations too, but at Syracuse University. Perhaps, your friend Loretta from University of Connecticut might have common professional gatherings with him.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Rafael Cortez, your task is to act/speak as Rafael Cortez would, keeping in mind Rafael Cortez's social goal.\nYou can find Rafael Cortez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Rafael Cortez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Rafael Cortez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. Personality and values description: Rafael Cortez, with his outgoing nature and competitive spirit, believes in self-direction. He employs a systematic approach to his decisions. Rafael's secrets: He cheated on his medical school exams.\nOliver Thompson's background: \nRafael Cortez's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nRobert: Major: Religious Education School: School of the Art Institute of Chicago \nLester: Major: Biological Specializations School: Syracuse University \nAugust: Major: Biological Specializations School: School of the Art Institute of Chicago \nRose: Major: Biological Specializations School: Calvin College \nRandy: Major: Biological Specializations School: Dowling College \nDennise: Major: Marine Engineering School: Wartburg College \nJoan: Major: Pre-School Education School: University of Texas at Arlington \nBarbara: Major: Ministry & Church Administration School: University of Connecticut \nLoretta: Major: Biological Specializations School: University of Connecticut \n\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"A pleasure to meet you, Oliver. I've always enjoyed meeting new people and learning about their experiences. Tell me, have you by any chance attended university?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, Rafael. I've earned my degree from the university. It's always a pleasure to reminisce about those times... and to network, surprisingly. A good friend of mine, Ruth, majored in Marine Engineering at Texas A&M University-Kingsville. I suppose the world is smaller than we think - do you happen to know someone from there too?\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"That's fascinating, Oliver. Although I don't personally know anyone from Texas A&M University-Kingsville, a good friend of mine, Dennise, majored in Marine Engineering as well, but she studied at Wartburg College. Maybe they've crossed paths in the professional world. By the way, are you by any chance acquainted with students from School of the Art Institute of Chicago or the University of Connecticut?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"The world is incredibly connected, isn't it? Indeed, I am familiar with someone from the University of Connecticut - my friend Loretta studied Biological Specializations there. As for the School of the Art Institute of Chicago, I can't say I know anyone who went there. It is always fascinating to hear about the variety of institutions my acquaintances have attended. What about you, Rafael? Do you have friends attending universities in Texas, perhaps?\"\n\nTurn #4: Rafael Cortez said: \"Small world indeed, Oliver! Yes, I do have friends in Texas, interestingly enough. My friend Joan studied Pre-School Education at University of Texas at Arlington. The world of academia really can interconnect in unexpected ways. By the by, have you had any connections to Syracuse University?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ah, Syracuse University? I can't recall having met anyone from there. It's truly interesting how academia extends its threads creating a global network. I do know Jamie who studied Pre-School Education like your friend Joan, but at the University of Texas at Arlington. It's indeed fascinating how these connections form!\"\n\nTurn #6: Rafael Cortez said: \"It's truly fascinating, isn't it, Oliver? It seems like our friends have brushed by each other at the University of Texas at Arlington. There's no doubt that the academic world is an intricate web connecting diverse individuals. Interestingly, my friend Lester did his major in Biological Specializations too, but at Syracuse University. Perhaps, your friend Loretta from University of Connecticut might have common professional gatherings with him.\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"That\u2019s very intriguing, Rafael. It's entirely possible that Loretta and Lester may have encountered each other at a conference or professional gathering. The spheres of academia and profession sometimes cause paths to cross in the most unexpected ways. By the way, do you happen to have any connection with graduates from Valley City State University?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Valley City State University, hmm... I don\u2019t recall having a connection with that institution, Oliver. Most of my acquaintances tend to have a background in the medical or biological fields, considering my profession as a surgeon. But, as we discussed earlier, the world of academia is quite wide and interwoven. Maybe in the near future, I might strike up a conversation with someone from Valley City State University, wouldn't that be something?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Rafael Cortez, your task is to act/speak as Rafael Cortez would, keeping in mind Rafael Cortez's social goal.\nYou can find Rafael Cortez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Rafael Cortez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Rafael Cortez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. Personality and values description: Rafael Cortez, with his outgoing nature and competitive spirit, believes in self-direction. He employs a systematic approach to his decisions. Rafael's secrets: He cheated on his medical school exams.\nOliver Thompson's background: \nRafael Cortez's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nRobert: Major: Religious Education School: School of the Art Institute of Chicago \nLester: Major: Biological Specializations School: Syracuse University \nAugust: Major: Biological Specializations School: School of the Art Institute of Chicago \nRose: Major: Biological Specializations School: Calvin College \nRandy: Major: Biological Specializations School: Dowling College \nDennise: Major: Marine Engineering School: Wartburg College \nJoan: Major: Pre-School Education School: University of Texas at Arlington \nBarbara: Major: Ministry & Church Administration School: University of Connecticut \nLoretta: Major: Biological Specializations School: University of Connecticut \n\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"A pleasure to meet you, Oliver. I've always enjoyed meeting new people and learning about their experiences. Tell me, have you by any chance attended university?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, Rafael. I've earned my degree from the university. It's always a pleasure to reminisce about those times... and to network, surprisingly. A good friend of mine, Ruth, majored in Marine Engineering at Texas A&M University-Kingsville. I suppose the world is smaller than we think - do you happen to know someone from there too?\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"That's fascinating, Oliver. Although I don't personally know anyone from Texas A&M University-Kingsville, a good friend of mine, Dennise, majored in Marine Engineering as well, but she studied at Wartburg College. Maybe they've crossed paths in the professional world. By the way, are you by any chance acquainted with students from School of the Art Institute of Chicago or the University of Connecticut?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"The world is incredibly connected, isn't it? Indeed, I am familiar with someone from the University of Connecticut - my friend Loretta studied Biological Specializations there. As for the School of the Art Institute of Chicago, I can't say I know anyone who went there. It is always fascinating to hear about the variety of institutions my acquaintances have attended. What about you, Rafael? Do you have friends attending universities in Texas, perhaps?\"\n\nTurn #4: Rafael Cortez said: \"Small world indeed, Oliver! Yes, I do have friends in Texas, interestingly enough. My friend Joan studied Pre-School Education at University of Texas at Arlington. The world of academia really can interconnect in unexpected ways. By the by, have you had any connections to Syracuse University?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ah, Syracuse University? I can't recall having met anyone from there. It's truly interesting how academia extends its threads creating a global network. I do know Jamie who studied Pre-School Education like your friend Joan, but at the University of Texas at Arlington. It's indeed fascinating how these connections form!\"\n\nTurn #6: Rafael Cortez said: \"It's truly fascinating, isn't it, Oliver? It seems like our friends have brushed by each other at the University of Texas at Arlington. There's no doubt that the academic world is an intricate web connecting diverse individuals. Interestingly, my friend Lester did his major in Biological Specializations too, but at Syracuse University. Perhaps, your friend Loretta from University of Connecticut might have common professional gatherings with him.\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"That\u2019s very intriguing, Rafael. It's entirely possible that Loretta and Lester may have encountered each other at a conference or professional gathering. The spheres of academia and profession sometimes cause paths to cross in the most unexpected ways. By the way, do you happen to have any connection with graduates from Valley City State University?\"\n\nTurn #8: Rafael Cortez said: \"Valley City State University, hmm... I don\u2019t recall having a connection with that institution, Oliver. Most of my acquaintances tend to have a background in the medical or biological fields, considering my profession as a surgeon. But, as we discussed earlier, the world of academia is quite wide and interwoven. Maybe in the near future, I might strike up a conversation with someone from Valley City State University, wouldn't that be something?\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Thompson said: \"I agree, Rafael. The interconnections in the world of academia are indeed fascinating. It seems we don't have a direct mutual friend but who knows how close we are in the grand web of connections? It was a pleasure talking with you, and meeting people with similar circles like yours is always delightful. What do you say we grab a drink and continue our conversation over there?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Oliver. The interconnections of our world are indeed a fascinating mystery. Let's continue unraveling it over that drink! After all, a well-crafted conversation is much like a game of chess, each move leading us closer to a shared understanding.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Rafael Cortez, your task is to act/speak as Rafael Cortez would, keeping in mind Rafael Cortez's social goal.\nYou can find Rafael Cortez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Rafael Cortez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Rafael Cortez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. Personality and values description: Rafael Cortez, with his outgoing nature and competitive spirit, believes in self-direction. He employs a systematic approach to his decisions. Rafael's secrets: He cheated on his medical school exams.\nOliver Thompson's background: \nRafael Cortez's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nRobert: Major: Religious Education School: School of the Art Institute of Chicago \nLester: Major: Biological Specializations School: Syracuse University \nAugust: Major: Biological Specializations School: School of the Art Institute of Chicago \nRose: Major: Biological Specializations School: Calvin College \nRandy: Major: Biological Specializations School: Dowling College \nDennise: Major: Marine Engineering School: Wartburg College \nJoan: Major: Pre-School Education School: University of Texas at Arlington \nBarbara: Major: Ministry & Church Administration School: University of Connecticut \nLoretta: Major: Biological Specializations School: University of Connecticut \n\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"A pleasure to meet you, Oliver. I've always enjoyed meeting new people and learning about their experiences. Tell me, have you by any chance attended university?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, Rafael. I've earned my degree from the university. It's always a pleasure to reminisce about those times... and to network, surprisingly. A good friend of mine, Ruth, majored in Marine Engineering at Texas A&M University-Kingsville. I suppose the world is smaller than we think - do you happen to know someone from there too?\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"That's fascinating, Oliver. Although I don't personally know anyone from Texas A&M University-Kingsville, a good friend of mine, Dennise, majored in Marine Engineering as well, but she studied at Wartburg College. Maybe they've crossed paths in the professional world. By the way, are you by any chance acquainted with students from School of the Art Institute of Chicago or the University of Connecticut?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"The world is incredibly connected, isn't it? Indeed, I am familiar with someone from the University of Connecticut - my friend Loretta studied Biological Specializations there. As for the School of the Art Institute of Chicago, I can't say I know anyone who went there. It is always fascinating to hear about the variety of institutions my acquaintances have attended. What about you, Rafael? Do you have friends attending universities in Texas, perhaps?\"\n\nTurn #4: Rafael Cortez said: \"Small world indeed, Oliver! Yes, I do have friends in Texas, interestingly enough. My friend Joan studied Pre-School Education at University of Texas at Arlington. The world of academia really can interconnect in unexpected ways. By the by, have you had any connections to Syracuse University?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ah, Syracuse University? I can't recall having met anyone from there. It's truly interesting how academia extends its threads creating a global network. I do know Jamie who studied Pre-School Education like your friend Joan, but at the University of Texas at Arlington. It's indeed fascinating how these connections form!\"\n\nTurn #6: Rafael Cortez said: \"It's truly fascinating, isn't it, Oliver? It seems like our friends have brushed by each other at the University of Texas at Arlington. There's no doubt that the academic world is an intricate web connecting diverse individuals. Interestingly, my friend Lester did his major in Biological Specializations too, but at Syracuse University. Perhaps, your friend Loretta from University of Connecticut might have common professional gatherings with him.\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"That\u2019s very intriguing, Rafael. It's entirely possible that Loretta and Lester may have encountered each other at a conference or professional gathering. The spheres of academia and profession sometimes cause paths to cross in the most unexpected ways. By the way, do you happen to have any connection with graduates from Valley City State University?\"\n\nTurn #8: Rafael Cortez said: \"Valley City State University, hmm... I don\u2019t recall having a connection with that institution, Oliver. Most of my acquaintances tend to have a background in the medical or biological fields, considering my profession as a surgeon. But, as we discussed earlier, the world of academia is quite wide and interwoven. Maybe in the near future, I might strike up a conversation with someone from Valley City State University, wouldn't that be something?\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Thompson said: \"I agree, Rafael. The interconnections in the world of academia are indeed fascinating. It seems we don't have a direct mutual friend but who knows how close we are in the grand web of connections? It was a pleasure talking with you, and meeting people with similar circles like yours is always delightful. What do you say we grab a drink and continue our conversation over there?\"\n\nTurn #10: Rafael Cortez said: \"Absolutely, Oliver. The interconnections of our world are indeed a fascinating mystery. Let's continue unraveling it over that drink! After all, a well-crafted conversation is much like a game of chess, each move leading us closer to a shared understanding.\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Thompson left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nRafael Cortez's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nEric: Major: Physical Education School: University of Texas at Arlington \nDarrell: Major: Physical Education School: Valley City State University \nRuth: Major: Marine Engineering School: Texas A&M University-Kingsville \nJamie: Major: Pre-School Education School: University of Texas at Arlington \nMarjorie: Major: Multi Studies School: Pacific Western University \nEvelyn: Major: Pre-School Education School: Tennessee Technological University \nLoretta: Major: Biological Specializations School: University of Connecticut \nJames: Major: Marine Engineering School: Texas A&M University-Kingsville \nSandra: Major: Ministry & Church Administration School: University of Texas at Arlington\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"A pleasure to meet you, Oliver. I've always enjoyed meeting new people and learning about their experiences. Tell me, have you by any chance attended university?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, Rafael. I've earned my degree from the university. It's always a pleasure to reminisce about those times... and to network, surprisingly. A good friend of mine, Ruth, majored in Marine Engineering at Texas A&M University-Kingsville. I suppose the world is smaller than we think - do you happen to know someone from there too?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nRafael Cortez's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nEric: Major: Physical Education School: University of Texas at Arlington \nDarrell: Major: Physical Education School: Valley City State University \nRuth: Major: Marine Engineering School: Texas A&M University-Kingsville \nJamie: Major: Pre-School Education School: University of Texas at Arlington \nMarjorie: Major: Multi Studies School: Pacific Western University \nEvelyn: Major: Pre-School Education School: Tennessee Technological University \nLoretta: Major: Biological Specializations School: University of Connecticut \nJames: Major: Marine Engineering School: Texas A&M University-Kingsville \nSandra: Major: Ministry & Church Administration School: University of Texas at Arlington\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"A pleasure to meet you, Oliver. I've always enjoyed meeting new people and learning about their experiences. Tell me, have you by any chance attended university?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, Rafael. I've earned my degree from the university. It's always a pleasure to reminisce about those times... and to network, surprisingly. A good friend of mine, Ruth, majored in Marine Engineering at Texas A&M University-Kingsville. I suppose the world is smaller than we think - do you happen to know someone from there too?\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"That's fascinating, Oliver. Although I don't personally know anyone from Texas A&M University-Kingsville, a good friend of mine, Dennise, majored in Marine Engineering as well, but she studied at Wartburg College. Maybe they've crossed paths in the professional world. By the way, are you by any chance acquainted with students from School of the Art Institute of Chicago or the University of Connecticut?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"The world is incredibly connected, isn't it? Indeed, I am familiar with someone from the University of Connecticut - my friend Loretta studied Biological Specializations there. As for the School of the Art Institute of Chicago, I can't say I know anyone who went there. It is always fascinating to hear about the variety of institutions my acquaintances have attended. What about you, Rafael? Do you have friends attending universities in Texas, perhaps?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nRafael Cortez's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nEric: Major: Physical Education School: University of Texas at Arlington \nDarrell: Major: Physical Education School: Valley City State University \nRuth: Major: Marine Engineering School: Texas A&M University-Kingsville \nJamie: Major: Pre-School Education School: University of Texas at Arlington \nMarjorie: Major: Multi Studies School: Pacific Western University \nEvelyn: Major: Pre-School Education School: Tennessee Technological University \nLoretta: Major: Biological Specializations School: University of Connecticut \nJames: Major: Marine Engineering School: Texas A&M University-Kingsville \nSandra: Major: Ministry & Church Administration School: University of Texas at Arlington\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"A pleasure to meet you, Oliver. I've always enjoyed meeting new people and learning about their experiences. Tell me, have you by any chance attended university?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, Rafael. I've earned my degree from the university. It's always a pleasure to reminisce about those times... and to network, surprisingly. A good friend of mine, Ruth, majored in Marine Engineering at Texas A&M University-Kingsville. I suppose the world is smaller than we think - do you happen to know someone from there too?\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"That's fascinating, Oliver. Although I don't personally know anyone from Texas A&M University-Kingsville, a good friend of mine, Dennise, majored in Marine Engineering as well, but she studied at Wartburg College. Maybe they've crossed paths in the professional world. By the way, are you by any chance acquainted with students from School of the Art Institute of Chicago or the University of Connecticut?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"The world is incredibly connected, isn't it? Indeed, I am familiar with someone from the University of Connecticut - my friend Loretta studied Biological Specializations there. As for the School of the Art Institute of Chicago, I can't say I know anyone who went there. It is always fascinating to hear about the variety of institutions my acquaintances have attended. What about you, Rafael? Do you have friends attending universities in Texas, perhaps?\"\n\nTurn #4: Rafael Cortez said: \"Small world indeed, Oliver! Yes, I do have friends in Texas, interestingly enough. My friend Joan studied Pre-School Education at University of Texas at Arlington. The world of academia really can interconnect in unexpected ways. By the by, have you had any connections to Syracuse University?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ah, Syracuse University? I can't recall having met anyone from there. It's truly interesting how academia extends its threads creating a global network. I do know Jamie who studied Pre-School Education like your friend Joan, but at the University of Texas at Arlington. It's indeed fascinating how these connections form!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nRafael Cortez's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nEric: Major: Physical Education School: University of Texas at Arlington \nDarrell: Major: Physical Education School: Valley City State University \nRuth: Major: Marine Engineering School: Texas A&M University-Kingsville \nJamie: Major: Pre-School Education School: University of Texas at Arlington \nMarjorie: Major: Multi Studies School: Pacific Western University \nEvelyn: Major: Pre-School Education School: Tennessee Technological University \nLoretta: Major: Biological Specializations School: University of Connecticut \nJames: Major: Marine Engineering School: Texas A&M University-Kingsville \nSandra: Major: Ministry & Church Administration School: University of Texas at Arlington\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"A pleasure to meet you, Oliver. I've always enjoyed meeting new people and learning about their experiences. Tell me, have you by any chance attended university?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, Rafael. I've earned my degree from the university. It's always a pleasure to reminisce about those times... and to network, surprisingly. A good friend of mine, Ruth, majored in Marine Engineering at Texas A&M University-Kingsville. I suppose the world is smaller than we think - do you happen to know someone from there too?\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"That's fascinating, Oliver. Although I don't personally know anyone from Texas A&M University-Kingsville, a good friend of mine, Dennise, majored in Marine Engineering as well, but she studied at Wartburg College. Maybe they've crossed paths in the professional world. By the way, are you by any chance acquainted with students from School of the Art Institute of Chicago or the University of Connecticut?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"The world is incredibly connected, isn't it? Indeed, I am familiar with someone from the University of Connecticut - my friend Loretta studied Biological Specializations there. As for the School of the Art Institute of Chicago, I can't say I know anyone who went there. It is always fascinating to hear about the variety of institutions my acquaintances have attended. What about you, Rafael? Do you have friends attending universities in Texas, perhaps?\"\n\nTurn #4: Rafael Cortez said: \"Small world indeed, Oliver! Yes, I do have friends in Texas, interestingly enough. My friend Joan studied Pre-School Education at University of Texas at Arlington. The world of academia really can interconnect in unexpected ways. By the by, have you had any connections to Syracuse University?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ah, Syracuse University? I can't recall having met anyone from there. It's truly interesting how academia extends its threads creating a global network. I do know Jamie who studied Pre-School Education like your friend Joan, but at the University of Texas at Arlington. It's indeed fascinating how these connections form!\"\n\nTurn #6: Rafael Cortez said: \"It's truly fascinating, isn't it, Oliver? It seems like our friends have brushed by each other at the University of Texas at Arlington. There's no doubt that the academic world is an intricate web connecting diverse individuals. Interestingly, my friend Lester did his major in Biological Specializations too, but at Syracuse University. Perhaps, your friend Loretta from University of Connecticut might have common professional gatherings with him.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That\u2019s very intriguing, Rafael. It's entirely possible that Loretta and Lester may have encountered each other at a conference or professional gathering. The spheres of academia and profession sometimes cause paths to cross in the most unexpected ways. By the way, do you happen to have any connection with graduates from Valley City State University?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nRafael Cortez's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nEric: Major: Physical Education School: University of Texas at Arlington \nDarrell: Major: Physical Education School: Valley City State University \nRuth: Major: Marine Engineering School: Texas A&M University-Kingsville \nJamie: Major: Pre-School Education School: University of Texas at Arlington \nMarjorie: Major: Multi Studies School: Pacific Western University \nEvelyn: Major: Pre-School Education School: Tennessee Technological University \nLoretta: Major: Biological Specializations School: University of Connecticut \nJames: Major: Marine Engineering School: Texas A&M University-Kingsville \nSandra: Major: Ministry & Church Administration School: University of Texas at Arlington\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"A pleasure to meet you, Oliver. I've always enjoyed meeting new people and learning about their experiences. Tell me, have you by any chance attended university?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, Rafael. I've earned my degree from the university. It's always a pleasure to reminisce about those times... and to network, surprisingly. A good friend of mine, Ruth, majored in Marine Engineering at Texas A&M University-Kingsville. I suppose the world is smaller than we think - do you happen to know someone from there too?\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"That's fascinating, Oliver. Although I don't personally know anyone from Texas A&M University-Kingsville, a good friend of mine, Dennise, majored in Marine Engineering as well, but she studied at Wartburg College. Maybe they've crossed paths in the professional world. By the way, are you by any chance acquainted with students from School of the Art Institute of Chicago or the University of Connecticut?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"The world is incredibly connected, isn't it? Indeed, I am familiar with someone from the University of Connecticut - my friend Loretta studied Biological Specializations there. As for the School of the Art Institute of Chicago, I can't say I know anyone who went there. It is always fascinating to hear about the variety of institutions my acquaintances have attended. What about you, Rafael? Do you have friends attending universities in Texas, perhaps?\"\n\nTurn #4: Rafael Cortez said: \"Small world indeed, Oliver! Yes, I do have friends in Texas, interestingly enough. My friend Joan studied Pre-School Education at University of Texas at Arlington. The world of academia really can interconnect in unexpected ways. By the by, have you had any connections to Syracuse University?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ah, Syracuse University? I can't recall having met anyone from there. It's truly interesting how academia extends its threads creating a global network. I do know Jamie who studied Pre-School Education like your friend Joan, but at the University of Texas at Arlington. It's indeed fascinating how these connections form!\"\n\nTurn #6: Rafael Cortez said: \"It's truly fascinating, isn't it, Oliver? It seems like our friends have brushed by each other at the University of Texas at Arlington. There's no doubt that the academic world is an intricate web connecting diverse individuals. Interestingly, my friend Lester did his major in Biological Specializations too, but at Syracuse University. Perhaps, your friend Loretta from University of Connecticut might have common professional gatherings with him.\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"That\u2019s very intriguing, Rafael. It's entirely possible that Loretta and Lester may have encountered each other at a conference or professional gathering. The spheres of academia and profession sometimes cause paths to cross in the most unexpected ways. By the way, do you happen to have any connection with graduates from Valley City State University?\"\n\nTurn #8: Rafael Cortez said: \"Valley City State University, hmm... I don\u2019t recall having a connection with that institution, Oliver. Most of my acquaintances tend to have a background in the medical or biological fields, considering my profession as a surgeon. But, as we discussed earlier, the world of academia is quite wide and interwoven. Maybe in the near future, I might strike up a conversation with someone from Valley City State University, wouldn't that be something?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I agree, Rafael. The interconnections in the world of academia are indeed fascinating. It seems we don't have a direct mutual friend but who knows how close we are in the grand web of connections? It was a pleasure talking with you, and meeting people with similar circles like yours is always delightful. What do you say we grab a drink and continue our conversation over there?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nRafael Cortez's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nEric: Major: Physical Education School: University of Texas at Arlington \nDarrell: Major: Physical Education School: Valley City State University \nRuth: Major: Marine Engineering School: Texas A&M University-Kingsville \nJamie: Major: Pre-School Education School: University of Texas at Arlington \nMarjorie: Major: Multi Studies School: Pacific Western University \nEvelyn: Major: Pre-School Education School: Tennessee Technological University \nLoretta: Major: Biological Specializations School: University of Connecticut \nJames: Major: Marine Engineering School: Texas A&M University-Kingsville \nSandra: Major: Ministry & Church Administration School: University of Texas at Arlington\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"A pleasure to meet you, Oliver. I've always enjoyed meeting new people and learning about their experiences. Tell me, have you by any chance attended university?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, Rafael. I've earned my degree from the university. It's always a pleasure to reminisce about those times... and to network, surprisingly. A good friend of mine, Ruth, majored in Marine Engineering at Texas A&M University-Kingsville. I suppose the world is smaller than we think - do you happen to know someone from there too?\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"That's fascinating, Oliver. Although I don't personally know anyone from Texas A&M University-Kingsville, a good friend of mine, Dennise, majored in Marine Engineering as well, but she studied at Wartburg College. Maybe they've crossed paths in the professional world. By the way, are you by any chance acquainted with students from School of the Art Institute of Chicago or the University of Connecticut?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"The world is incredibly connected, isn't it? Indeed, I am familiar with someone from the University of Connecticut - my friend Loretta studied Biological Specializations there. As for the School of the Art Institute of Chicago, I can't say I know anyone who went there. It is always fascinating to hear about the variety of institutions my acquaintances have attended. What about you, Rafael? Do you have friends attending universities in Texas, perhaps?\"\n\nTurn #4: Rafael Cortez said: \"Small world indeed, Oliver! Yes, I do have friends in Texas, interestingly enough. My friend Joan studied Pre-School Education at University of Texas at Arlington. The world of academia really can interconnect in unexpected ways. By the by, have you had any connections to Syracuse University?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ah, Syracuse University? I can't recall having met anyone from there. It's truly interesting how academia extends its threads creating a global network. I do know Jamie who studied Pre-School Education like your friend Joan, but at the University of Texas at Arlington. It's indeed fascinating how these connections form!\"\n\nTurn #6: Rafael Cortez said: \"It's truly fascinating, isn't it, Oliver? It seems like our friends have brushed by each other at the University of Texas at Arlington. There's no doubt that the academic world is an intricate web connecting diverse individuals. Interestingly, my friend Lester did his major in Biological Specializations too, but at Syracuse University. Perhaps, your friend Loretta from University of Connecticut might have common professional gatherings with him.\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"That\u2019s very intriguing, Rafael. It's entirely possible that Loretta and Lester may have encountered each other at a conference or professional gathering. The spheres of academia and profession sometimes cause paths to cross in the most unexpected ways. By the way, do you happen to have any connection with graduates from Valley City State University?\"\n\nTurn #8: Rafael Cortez said: \"Valley City State University, hmm... I don\u2019t recall having a connection with that institution, Oliver. Most of my acquaintances tend to have a background in the medical or biological fields, considering my profession as a surgeon. But, as we discussed earlier, the world of academia is quite wide and interwoven. Maybe in the near future, I might strike up a conversation with someone from Valley City State University, wouldn't that be something?\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Thompson said: \"I agree, Rafael. The interconnections in the world of academia are indeed fascinating. It seems we don't have a direct mutual friend but who knows how close we are in the grand web of connections? It was a pleasure talking with you, and meeting people with similar circles like yours is always delightful. What do you say we grab a drink and continue our conversation over there?\"\n\nTurn #10: Rafael Cortez said: \"Absolutely, Oliver. The interconnections of our world are indeed a fascinating mystery. Let's continue unraveling it over that drink! After all, a well-crafted conversation is much like a game of chess, each move leading us closer to a shared understanding.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Benjamin Jackson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nBenjamin Jackson's background: \nDonovan Reeves's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nAndrew: Hobby: Slot car racing School: Mount Senario College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Exxon \nMelissa: Hobby: Astronomy School: Weber State University Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Hornbeck Offshore Services \nAnna: Hobby: Climbing School: Valley City State University Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: National Airlines \nSoledad: Hobby: Parkour School: Valley City State University Major: Biological Specializations Company: Concur Technologies \nJohn: Hobby: Astronomy School: Mount Senario College Major: Fire Protection & Security Company: Gibson Guitar Corporation \nLawrence: Hobby: Sculling School: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Leonard Green & Partners \n\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Hey, nice to meet you, Benjamin. Are you into software development or gaming by any chance?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Benjamin Jackson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nBenjamin Jackson's background: \nDonovan Reeves's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nAndrew: Hobby: Slot car racing School: Mount Senario College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Exxon \nMelissa: Hobby: Astronomy School: Weber State University Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Hornbeck Offshore Services \nAnna: Hobby: Climbing School: Valley City State University Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: National Airlines \nSoledad: Hobby: Parkour School: Valley City State University Major: Biological Specializations Company: Concur Technologies \nJohn: Hobby: Astronomy School: Mount Senario College Major: Fire Protection & Security Company: Gibson Guitar Corporation \nLawrence: Hobby: Sculling School: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Leonard Green & Partners \n\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey, nice to meet you, Benjamin. Are you into software development or gaming by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Donovan, nice to meet you too. To be honest, I'm not particularly into software or gaming. My real passion lies in environmental activism. By the way, do you happen to engage in any sports or hobbies in your free time? I've got a few friends who are quite active in things like sculling and badminton.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's quite interesting, Benjamin. Environmental activism, huh? We do need more people like you these days. As for hobbies, well, not exactly active sports, but I have a friend named Lawrence who's into sculling. Do you happen to know him? He also studied Hispanic-American Studies at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. Besides that, I enjoy participating in global coding competitions and playing games.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Benjamin Jackson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nBenjamin Jackson's background: \nDonovan Reeves's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nAndrew: Hobby: Slot car racing School: Mount Senario College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Exxon \nMelissa: Hobby: Astronomy School: Weber State University Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Hornbeck Offshore Services \nAnna: Hobby: Climbing School: Valley City State University Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: National Airlines \nSoledad: Hobby: Parkour School: Valley City State University Major: Biological Specializations Company: Concur Technologies \nJohn: Hobby: Astronomy School: Mount Senario College Major: Fire Protection & Security Company: Gibson Guitar Corporation \nLawrence: Hobby: Sculling School: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Leonard Green & Partners \n\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey, nice to meet you, Benjamin. Are you into software development or gaming by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Donovan, nice to meet you too. To be honest, I'm not particularly into software or gaming. My real passion lies in environmental activism. By the way, do you happen to engage in any sports or hobbies in your free time? I've got a few friends who are quite active in things like sculling and badminton.\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"That's quite interesting, Benjamin. Environmental activism, huh? We do need more people like you these days. As for hobbies, well, not exactly active sports, but I have a friend named Lawrence who's into sculling. Do you happen to know him? He also studied Hispanic-American Studies at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. Besides that, I enjoy participating in global coding competitions and playing games.\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Oh, Lawrence! Yes, I do know him, we share a close circle. Small world, isn't it? And that's very cool that you participate in global coding competitions - a distinct contrast from my own activities, but impressive nonetheless. Out of curiosity, do you have any interests in language studies? I've got friends who majored in Middle Eastern Languages and Hispanic-American Studies.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Indeed, it is a small world! As for languages, I do have a couple of friends who majored in Middle Eastern Languages. One of them is Andrew, who studied at a college high up in Wisconsin, Mount Senario College, if I recall correctly. The other is Anna, from Valley City State University. Do their names ring any bells, Benjamin?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Benjamin Jackson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nBenjamin Jackson's background: \nDonovan Reeves's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nAndrew: Hobby: Slot car racing School: Mount Senario College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Exxon \nMelissa: Hobby: Astronomy School: Weber State University Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Hornbeck Offshore Services \nAnna: Hobby: Climbing School: Valley City State University Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: National Airlines \nSoledad: Hobby: Parkour School: Valley City State University Major: Biological Specializations Company: Concur Technologies \nJohn: Hobby: Astronomy School: Mount Senario College Major: Fire Protection & Security Company: Gibson Guitar Corporation \nLawrence: Hobby: Sculling School: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Leonard Green & Partners \n\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey, nice to meet you, Benjamin. Are you into software development or gaming by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Donovan, nice to meet you too. To be honest, I'm not particularly into software or gaming. My real passion lies in environmental activism. By the way, do you happen to engage in any sports or hobbies in your free time? I've got a few friends who are quite active in things like sculling and badminton.\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"That's quite interesting, Benjamin. Environmental activism, huh? We do need more people like you these days. As for hobbies, well, not exactly active sports, but I have a friend named Lawrence who's into sculling. Do you happen to know him? He also studied Hispanic-American Studies at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. Besides that, I enjoy participating in global coding competitions and playing games.\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Oh, Lawrence! Yes, I do know him, we share a close circle. Small world, isn't it? And that's very cool that you participate in global coding competitions - a distinct contrast from my own activities, but impressive nonetheless. Out of curiosity, do you have any interests in language studies? I've got friends who majored in Middle Eastern Languages and Hispanic-American Studies.\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"Indeed, it is a small world! As for languages, I do have a couple of friends who majored in Middle Eastern Languages. One of them is Andrew, who studied at a college high up in Wisconsin, Mount Senario College, if I recall correctly. The other is Anna, from Valley City State University. Do their names ring any bells, Benjamin?\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ah, Mount Senario College does sound familiar! I actually have a friend named Cristina who studied Middle Eastern Languages there as well. Curious, isn't it? And coding competitions you mentioned, does it involve any particular companies? Several of my friends work in different sectors like Vertex Pharmaceuticals, ConverDyn, and even Exxon, although that last one might be a surprise considering my passion for environmental activism!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"It's amazing how interconnected our worlds are, isn't it Benjamin? And yes, the coding competitions involve a plethora of companies, often partnering for specific events. Talking about Exxon, I actually know someone, Andrew, who works there. He also happens to be from Mount Senario College. So, you see the world gets smaller by the minute!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Benjamin Jackson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nBenjamin Jackson's background: \nDonovan Reeves's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nAndrew: Hobby: Slot car racing School: Mount Senario College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Exxon \nMelissa: Hobby: Astronomy School: Weber State University Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Hornbeck Offshore Services \nAnna: Hobby: Climbing School: Valley City State University Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: National Airlines \nSoledad: Hobby: Parkour School: Valley City State University Major: Biological Specializations Company: Concur Technologies \nJohn: Hobby: Astronomy School: Mount Senario College Major: Fire Protection & Security Company: Gibson Guitar Corporation \nLawrence: Hobby: Sculling School: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Leonard Green & Partners \n\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey, nice to meet you, Benjamin. Are you into software development or gaming by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Donovan, nice to meet you too. To be honest, I'm not particularly into software or gaming. My real passion lies in environmental activism. By the way, do you happen to engage in any sports or hobbies in your free time? I've got a few friends who are quite active in things like sculling and badminton.\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"That's quite interesting, Benjamin. Environmental activism, huh? We do need more people like you these days. As for hobbies, well, not exactly active sports, but I have a friend named Lawrence who's into sculling. Do you happen to know him? He also studied Hispanic-American Studies at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. Besides that, I enjoy participating in global coding competitions and playing games.\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Oh, Lawrence! Yes, I do know him, we share a close circle. Small world, isn't it? And that's very cool that you participate in global coding competitions - a distinct contrast from my own activities, but impressive nonetheless. Out of curiosity, do you have any interests in language studies? I've got friends who majored in Middle Eastern Languages and Hispanic-American Studies.\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"Indeed, it is a small world! As for languages, I do have a couple of friends who majored in Middle Eastern Languages. One of them is Andrew, who studied at a college high up in Wisconsin, Mount Senario College, if I recall correctly. The other is Anna, from Valley City State University. Do their names ring any bells, Benjamin?\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ah, Mount Senario College does sound familiar! I actually have a friend named Cristina who studied Middle Eastern Languages there as well. Curious, isn't it? And coding competitions you mentioned, does it involve any particular companies? Several of my friends work in different sectors like Vertex Pharmaceuticals, ConverDyn, and even Exxon, although that last one might be a surprise considering my passion for environmental activism!\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"It's amazing how interconnected our worlds are, isn't it Benjamin? And yes, the coding competitions involve a plethora of companies, often partnering for specific events. Talking about Exxon, I actually know someone, Andrew, who works there. He also happens to be from Mount Senario College. So, you see the world gets smaller by the minute!\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's quite a coincidence we both know Andrew from Mount Senario College who now works at Exxon. It really reinforces your point about our worlds being interconnected, Donovan. And you're right, despite our contrasting interests, it's fascinating how our paths have crossed tonight. I'll be sure to drop Andrew a message about our encounter. It was really nice meeting you!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"It was truly a pleasure to meet you too, Benjamin. It's indeed fascinating how we managed to find so many connections despite our varying interests. I look forward to sharing this with Andrew as well. Take care and continue the good fight for the environment. We certainly need more people like you.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Benjamin Jackson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nBenjamin Jackson's background: \nDonovan Reeves's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nAndrew: Hobby: Slot car racing School: Mount Senario College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Exxon \nMelissa: Hobby: Astronomy School: Weber State University Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Hornbeck Offshore Services \nAnna: Hobby: Climbing School: Valley City State University Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: National Airlines \nSoledad: Hobby: Parkour School: Valley City State University Major: Biological Specializations Company: Concur Technologies \nJohn: Hobby: Astronomy School: Mount Senario College Major: Fire Protection & Security Company: Gibson Guitar Corporation \nLawrence: Hobby: Sculling School: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Leonard Green & Partners \n\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey, nice to meet you, Benjamin. Are you into software development or gaming by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Donovan, nice to meet you too. To be honest, I'm not particularly into software or gaming. My real passion lies in environmental activism. By the way, do you happen to engage in any sports or hobbies in your free time? I've got a few friends who are quite active in things like sculling and badminton.\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"That's quite interesting, Benjamin. Environmental activism, huh? We do need more people like you these days. As for hobbies, well, not exactly active sports, but I have a friend named Lawrence who's into sculling. Do you happen to know him? He also studied Hispanic-American Studies at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. Besides that, I enjoy participating in global coding competitions and playing games.\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Oh, Lawrence! Yes, I do know him, we share a close circle. Small world, isn't it? And that's very cool that you participate in global coding competitions - a distinct contrast from my own activities, but impressive nonetheless. Out of curiosity, do you have any interests in language studies? I've got friends who majored in Middle Eastern Languages and Hispanic-American Studies.\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"Indeed, it is a small world! As for languages, I do have a couple of friends who majored in Middle Eastern Languages. One of them is Andrew, who studied at a college high up in Wisconsin, Mount Senario College, if I recall correctly. The other is Anna, from Valley City State University. Do their names ring any bells, Benjamin?\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ah, Mount Senario College does sound familiar! I actually have a friend named Cristina who studied Middle Eastern Languages there as well. Curious, isn't it? And coding competitions you mentioned, does it involve any particular companies? Several of my friends work in different sectors like Vertex Pharmaceuticals, ConverDyn, and even Exxon, although that last one might be a surprise considering my passion for environmental activism!\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"It's amazing how interconnected our worlds are, isn't it Benjamin? And yes, the coding competitions involve a plethora of companies, often partnering for specific events. Talking about Exxon, I actually know someone, Andrew, who works there. He also happens to be from Mount Senario College. So, you see the world gets smaller by the minute!\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's quite a coincidence we both know Andrew from Mount Senario College who now works at Exxon. It really reinforces your point about our worlds being interconnected, Donovan. And you're right, despite our contrasting interests, it's fascinating how our paths have crossed tonight. I'll be sure to drop Andrew a message about our encounter. It was really nice meeting you!\"\n\nTurn #8: Donovan Reeves said: \"It was truly a pleasure to meet you too, Benjamin. It's indeed fascinating how we managed to find so many connections despite our varying interests. I look forward to sharing this with Andrew as well. Take care and continue the good fight for the environment. We certainly need more people like you.\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Benjamin Jackson\nDonovan Reeves's background: \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nLawrence: Hobby: Sculling School: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Leonard Green & Partners \nKay: Hobby: Badminton School: Black Hills State University Major: Religious Education Company: National Airlines \nTanya: Hobby: Badminton School: University of Illinois at Springfield Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: ConverDyn \nJason: Hobby: Badminton School: Mount Senario College Major: Senior High Education Company: Vertex Pharmaceuticals \nCristina: Hobby: Badminton School: Mount Senario College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Exxon \nJosef: Hobby: Curling School: California State University, Northridge Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Concur Technologies\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey, nice to meet you, Benjamin. Are you into software development or gaming by any chance?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Donovan, nice to meet you too. To be honest, I'm not particularly into software or gaming. My real passion lies in environmental activism. By the way, do you happen to engage in any sports or hobbies in your free time? I've got a few friends who are quite active in things like sculling and badminton.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Benjamin Jackson\nDonovan Reeves's background: \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nLawrence: Hobby: Sculling School: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Leonard Green & Partners \nKay: Hobby: Badminton School: Black Hills State University Major: Religious Education Company: National Airlines \nTanya: Hobby: Badminton School: University of Illinois at Springfield Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: ConverDyn \nJason: Hobby: Badminton School: Mount Senario College Major: Senior High Education Company: Vertex Pharmaceuticals \nCristina: Hobby: Badminton School: Mount Senario College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Exxon \nJosef: Hobby: Curling School: California State University, Northridge Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Concur Technologies\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey, nice to meet you, Benjamin. Are you into software development or gaming by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Donovan, nice to meet you too. To be honest, I'm not particularly into software or gaming. My real passion lies in environmental activism. By the way, do you happen to engage in any sports or hobbies in your free time? I've got a few friends who are quite active in things like sculling and badminton.\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"That's quite interesting, Benjamin. Environmental activism, huh? We do need more people like you these days. As for hobbies, well, not exactly active sports, but I have a friend named Lawrence who's into sculling. Do you happen to know him? He also studied Hispanic-American Studies at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. Besides that, I enjoy participating in global coding competitions and playing games.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oh, Lawrence! Yes, I do know him, we share a close circle. Small world, isn't it? And that's very cool that you participate in global coding competitions - a distinct contrast from my own activities, but impressive nonetheless. Out of curiosity, do you have any interests in language studies? I've got friends who majored in Middle Eastern Languages and Hispanic-American Studies.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Benjamin Jackson\nDonovan Reeves's background: \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nLawrence: Hobby: Sculling School: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Leonard Green & Partners \nKay: Hobby: Badminton School: Black Hills State University Major: Religious Education Company: National Airlines \nTanya: Hobby: Badminton School: University of Illinois at Springfield Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: ConverDyn \nJason: Hobby: Badminton School: Mount Senario College Major: Senior High Education Company: Vertex Pharmaceuticals \nCristina: Hobby: Badminton School: Mount Senario College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Exxon \nJosef: Hobby: Curling School: California State University, Northridge Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Concur Technologies\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey, nice to meet you, Benjamin. Are you into software development or gaming by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Donovan, nice to meet you too. To be honest, I'm not particularly into software or gaming. My real passion lies in environmental activism. By the way, do you happen to engage in any sports or hobbies in your free time? I've got a few friends who are quite active in things like sculling and badminton.\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"That's quite interesting, Benjamin. Environmental activism, huh? We do need more people like you these days. As for hobbies, well, not exactly active sports, but I have a friend named Lawrence who's into sculling. Do you happen to know him? He also studied Hispanic-American Studies at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. Besides that, I enjoy participating in global coding competitions and playing games.\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Oh, Lawrence! Yes, I do know him, we share a close circle. Small world, isn't it? And that's very cool that you participate in global coding competitions - a distinct contrast from my own activities, but impressive nonetheless. Out of curiosity, do you have any interests in language studies? I've got friends who majored in Middle Eastern Languages and Hispanic-American Studies.\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"Indeed, it is a small world! As for languages, I do have a couple of friends who majored in Middle Eastern Languages. One of them is Andrew, who studied at a college high up in Wisconsin, Mount Senario College, if I recall correctly. The other is Anna, from Valley City State University. Do their names ring any bells, Benjamin?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ah, Mount Senario College does sound familiar! I actually have a friend named Cristina who studied Middle Eastern Languages there as well. Curious, isn't it? And coding competitions you mentioned, does it involve any particular companies? Several of my friends work in different sectors like Vertex Pharmaceuticals, ConverDyn, and even Exxon, although that last one might be a surprise considering my passion for environmental activism!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Benjamin Jackson\nDonovan Reeves's background: \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nLawrence: Hobby: Sculling School: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Leonard Green & Partners \nKay: Hobby: Badminton School: Black Hills State University Major: Religious Education Company: National Airlines \nTanya: Hobby: Badminton School: University of Illinois at Springfield Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: ConverDyn \nJason: Hobby: Badminton School: Mount Senario College Major: Senior High Education Company: Vertex Pharmaceuticals \nCristina: Hobby: Badminton School: Mount Senario College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Exxon \nJosef: Hobby: Curling School: California State University, Northridge Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Concur Technologies\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey, nice to meet you, Benjamin. Are you into software development or gaming by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Donovan, nice to meet you too. To be honest, I'm not particularly into software or gaming. My real passion lies in environmental activism. By the way, do you happen to engage in any sports or hobbies in your free time? I've got a few friends who are quite active in things like sculling and badminton.\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"That's quite interesting, Benjamin. Environmental activism, huh? We do need more people like you these days. As for hobbies, well, not exactly active sports, but I have a friend named Lawrence who's into sculling. Do you happen to know him? He also studied Hispanic-American Studies at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. Besides that, I enjoy participating in global coding competitions and playing games.\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Oh, Lawrence! Yes, I do know him, we share a close circle. Small world, isn't it? And that's very cool that you participate in global coding competitions - a distinct contrast from my own activities, but impressive nonetheless. Out of curiosity, do you have any interests in language studies? I've got friends who majored in Middle Eastern Languages and Hispanic-American Studies.\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"Indeed, it is a small world! As for languages, I do have a couple of friends who majored in Middle Eastern Languages. One of them is Andrew, who studied at a college high up in Wisconsin, Mount Senario College, if I recall correctly. The other is Anna, from Valley City State University. Do their names ring any bells, Benjamin?\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ah, Mount Senario College does sound familiar! I actually have a friend named Cristina who studied Middle Eastern Languages there as well. Curious, isn't it? And coding competitions you mentioned, does it involve any particular companies? Several of my friends work in different sectors like Vertex Pharmaceuticals, ConverDyn, and even Exxon, although that last one might be a surprise considering my passion for environmental activism!\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"It's amazing how interconnected our worlds are, isn't it Benjamin? And yes, the coding competitions involve a plethora of companies, often partnering for specific events. Talking about Exxon, I actually know someone, Andrew, who works there. He also happens to be from Mount Senario College. So, you see the world gets smaller by the minute!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's quite a coincidence we both know Andrew from Mount Senario College who now works at Exxon. It really reinforces your point about our worlds being interconnected, Donovan. And you're right, despite our contrasting interests, it's fascinating how our paths have crossed tonight. I'll be sure to drop Andrew a message about our encounter. It was really nice meeting you!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Benjamin Jackson\nDonovan Reeves's background: \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nLawrence: Hobby: Sculling School: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Leonard Green & Partners \nKay: Hobby: Badminton School: Black Hills State University Major: Religious Education Company: National Airlines \nTanya: Hobby: Badminton School: University of Illinois at Springfield Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: ConverDyn \nJason: Hobby: Badminton School: Mount Senario College Major: Senior High Education Company: Vertex Pharmaceuticals \nCristina: Hobby: Badminton School: Mount Senario College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Exxon \nJosef: Hobby: Curling School: California State University, Northridge Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Concur Technologies\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey, nice to meet you, Benjamin. Are you into software development or gaming by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hey Donovan, nice to meet you too. To be honest, I'm not particularly into software or gaming. My real passion lies in environmental activism. By the way, do you happen to engage in any sports or hobbies in your free time? I've got a few friends who are quite active in things like sculling and badminton.\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"That's quite interesting, Benjamin. Environmental activism, huh? We do need more people like you these days. As for hobbies, well, not exactly active sports, but I have a friend named Lawrence who's into sculling. Do you happen to know him? He also studied Hispanic-American Studies at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. Besides that, I enjoy participating in global coding competitions and playing games.\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Oh, Lawrence! Yes, I do know him, we share a close circle. Small world, isn't it? And that's very cool that you participate in global coding competitions - a distinct contrast from my own activities, but impressive nonetheless. Out of curiosity, do you have any interests in language studies? I've got friends who majored in Middle Eastern Languages and Hispanic-American Studies.\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"Indeed, it is a small world! As for languages, I do have a couple of friends who majored in Middle Eastern Languages. One of them is Andrew, who studied at a college high up in Wisconsin, Mount Senario College, if I recall correctly. The other is Anna, from Valley City State University. Do their names ring any bells, Benjamin?\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Ah, Mount Senario College does sound familiar! I actually have a friend named Cristina who studied Middle Eastern Languages there as well. Curious, isn't it? And coding competitions you mentioned, does it involve any particular companies? Several of my friends work in different sectors like Vertex Pharmaceuticals, ConverDyn, and even Exxon, although that last one might be a surprise considering my passion for environmental activism!\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"It's amazing how interconnected our worlds are, isn't it Benjamin? And yes, the coding competitions involve a plethora of companies, often partnering for specific events. Talking about Exxon, I actually know someone, Andrew, who works there. He also happens to be from Mount Senario College. So, you see the world gets smaller by the minute!\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's quite a coincidence we both know Andrew from Mount Senario College who now works at Exxon. It really reinforces your point about our worlds being interconnected, Donovan. And you're right, despite our contrasting interests, it's fascinating how our paths have crossed tonight. I'll be sure to drop Andrew a message about our encounter. It was really nice meeting you!\"\n\nTurn #8: Donovan Reeves said: \"It was truly a pleasure to meet you too, Benjamin. It's indeed fascinating how we managed to find so many connections despite our varying interests. I look forward to sharing this with Andrew as well. Take care and continue the good fight for the environment. We certainly need more people like you.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nSamuel Anderson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nAugust: School: Saint Vincent College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nJohn: School: University of Rhode Island Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nRebecca: School: State University of New York at Albany Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nNeoma: School: Hofstra University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nRonnie: School: National Technological University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nSuzette: School: Utah Valley State College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPenelope: School: Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nFernando: School: St. John's College-Santa Fe Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nVelda: School: Rhode Island College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \n\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hi there, I'm Samuel. Nice party, isn't it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nSamuel Anderson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nAugust: School: Saint Vincent College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nJohn: School: University of Rhode Island Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nRebecca: School: State University of New York at Albany Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nNeoma: School: Hofstra University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nRonnie: School: National Technological University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nSuzette: School: Utah Valley State College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPenelope: School: Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nFernando: School: St. John's College-Santa Fe Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nVelda: School: Rhode Island College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \n\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hi there, I'm Samuel. Nice party, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello Samuel, I'm Hendrick. Pleasure to meet you. Indeed, I quite enjoy these gatherings too. Have you been attending these kinds of parties long?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Quite a few years actually! I've ended up meeting people from all sort of places, even bumped into some old school classmates sometimes. You ever have run-ins like that, Hendrick?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nSamuel Anderson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nAugust: School: Saint Vincent College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nJohn: School: University of Rhode Island Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nRebecca: School: State University of New York at Albany Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nNeoma: School: Hofstra University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nRonnie: School: National Technological University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nSuzette: School: Utah Valley State College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPenelope: School: Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nFernando: School: St. John's College-Santa Fe Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nVelda: School: Rhode Island College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \n\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hi there, I'm Samuel. Nice party, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello Samuel, I'm Hendrick. Pleasure to meet you. Indeed, I quite enjoy these gatherings too. Have you been attending these kinds of parties long?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Quite a few years actually! I've ended up meeting people from all sort of places, even bumped into some old school classmates sometimes. You ever have run-ins like that, Hendrick?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Samuel! Funny how you cross paths with old classmates in the most unexpected places. Speaking of school, did you attend any college? These schools have such vast networks, you never know where you might find an old classmate.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Yes, I did attend college. In fact, I got to know some really interesting people there. It was through them that I had some amazing experiences such as evening gatherings and indoor games. Did you have similar experiences, Hendrick?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Certainly, Samuel! I also had such memorable experiences in college. Especially, evening gatherings with close friends were quite common. By the way, did you ever attend any college based indoor parties? They can be different yet interesting.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, the indoor parties were always a highlight. I remember going to quite a few in various places on campus. College felt like a small world sometimes, didn't it?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, it's extraordinary how close-knit the college community can feel. Samuel, perhaps you might know some of my friends who also enjoy these indoor gatherings. Did you perhaps attend Southampton College or Antioch University-Los Angeles? They had quite the scene for indoor activities.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Can't say that I went to those exact institutions, Hendrick, but it's remarkable how similar our experiences sound. I used to know a friend from Texas A&M University in Corpus Christi who had a strong preference for indoor gathering too, same as my friend from Rhode Island College. Any chance you know people from those schools?\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, Texas A&M University in Corpus Christi and Rhode Island College? I can't say I know anyone from there personally, but it's fascinating how these college experiences can be so universal. Did any of these friends of yours also have a knack for culinary arts or maybe enjoyed wine-tasting? I've been hosting wine tasting nights for a bit and I've met a fair share of people from different colleges you wouldn't believe!\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's funny you should mention that, Hendrick! Actually, I do happen to know a couple of friends who really enjoy culinary arts. One could easily mistake our gatherings for a miniature food festival. Do you have friends like that who make get-togethers extra special with their cooking?\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Well it's funny that you should say that Samuel. I do have a friend, Lucille, a graduate of Southampton College, who not only loves indoor gatherings but is an amazing cook. We sometimes collaborate on menus for our gatherings. And on other occasions, Alyssa from Davidson College, another indoor gatherings enthusiast, wows us with her distinctive dishes. It's like having our own little gourmet festival.\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"That sounds delightful, Hendrick. Collaboration on a menu for gatherings must be great fun. Speaking of such cooks, one of my friends, Ronnie, went to the National Technological University. Ronnie's got a gifted hand in the kitchen. I wonder if your gatherings have ever crossed paths with Ronnie's flavor-filled events?\"\n\nTurn #13: Hendrick Heinz said: \"National Technological University, you say? I can't recall any acquaintance from there. But Ronnie sounds like an exceptional cook; good food brings people together, doesn't it? Have you ever hosted or been to a wine-tasting evening? It might seem random, but many of my friends who enjoy the culinary arts also share a love for tasting and appreciating good wines.\"\n\nTurn #14: Samuel Anderson said: \"Wine-tasting evenings sound like excellent fun, Hendrick! I can't say I've hosted one myself, but I do recall a friend I know, Suzette, who studied at Utah Valley State College. She's a big fan of organized wine tastings. It's amazing the variety of people we can meet through shared interests. Maybe you've crossed paths?\"\n\nTurn #15: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Suzette from Utah Valley State College, you say? I can't seem to recall crossing paths with her. But the beauty of these interests is that they can bring together like-minded people from various walks of life. I guess that's what makes gatherings, be it food festivals or wine-tasting sessions, so enriching and enjoyable!\"\n\nTurn #16: Samuel Anderson said: \"Indeed, Hendrick! It's so exciting to discover new people through shared interests. I must say I am particularly fond of spontaneous plans. Well, did any of your friends study at St. John's College-Santa Fe? My friend Fernando from there also loves indoor gatherings but prefers the ones outdoors. Maybe Fernando's outdoor events might ring a bell?\"\n\nTurn #17: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, St. John's College-Santa Fe? You know, I believe I do know someone! My friend Betty, a connoisseur of all things vintage, graduated from there. She loves indoor gatherings but tastes wine under the open sky. It's quite possible she might have attended one of Fernando's outdoor events! The world sure is small, isn't it, Samuel?\"\n\nTurn #18: Samuel Anderson said: \"Indeed, Hendrick! It truly is a small world. It's quite possible Fernando and Betty have crossed paths. Although, I must confess something interesting about myself. Apart from being a software developer, I was once a competitive figure skater. Maybe we know someone in common from that circle as well?\"\n\nTurn #19: Hendrick Heinz said: \"A competitive figure skater, that's quite impressive Samuel! Among my friends, I don't recall anyone specifically from the skating community. But as you rightly pointed out, it's quite possible that we may share acquaintances from unexpected circles as well. Remarkable, isn't it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #20. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nSamuel Anderson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nAugust: School: Saint Vincent College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nJohn: School: University of Rhode Island Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nRebecca: School: State University of New York at Albany Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nNeoma: School: Hofstra University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nRonnie: School: National Technological University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nSuzette: School: Utah Valley State College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPenelope: School: Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nFernando: School: St. John's College-Santa Fe Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nVelda: School: Rhode Island College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \n\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hi there, I'm Samuel. Nice party, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello Samuel, I'm Hendrick. Pleasure to meet you. Indeed, I quite enjoy these gatherings too. Have you been attending these kinds of parties long?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Quite a few years actually! I've ended up meeting people from all sort of places, even bumped into some old school classmates sometimes. You ever have run-ins like that, Hendrick?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Samuel! Funny how you cross paths with old classmates in the most unexpected places. Speaking of school, did you attend any college? These schools have such vast networks, you never know where you might find an old classmate.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Yes, I did attend college. In fact, I got to know some really interesting people there. It was through them that I had some amazing experiences such as evening gatherings and indoor games. Did you have similar experiences, Hendrick?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nSamuel Anderson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nAugust: School: Saint Vincent College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nJohn: School: University of Rhode Island Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nRebecca: School: State University of New York at Albany Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nNeoma: School: Hofstra University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nRonnie: School: National Technological University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nSuzette: School: Utah Valley State College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPenelope: School: Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nFernando: School: St. John's College-Santa Fe Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nVelda: School: Rhode Island College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \n\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hi there, I'm Samuel. Nice party, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello Samuel, I'm Hendrick. Pleasure to meet you. Indeed, I quite enjoy these gatherings too. Have you been attending these kinds of parties long?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Quite a few years actually! I've ended up meeting people from all sort of places, even bumped into some old school classmates sometimes. You ever have run-ins like that, Hendrick?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Samuel! Funny how you cross paths with old classmates in the most unexpected places. Speaking of school, did you attend any college? These schools have such vast networks, you never know where you might find an old classmate.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Yes, I did attend college. In fact, I got to know some really interesting people there. It was through them that I had some amazing experiences such as evening gatherings and indoor games. Did you have similar experiences, Hendrick?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Certainly, Samuel! I also had such memorable experiences in college. Especially, evening gatherings with close friends were quite common. By the way, did you ever attend any college based indoor parties? They can be different yet interesting.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, the indoor parties were always a highlight. I remember going to quite a few in various places on campus. College felt like a small world sometimes, didn't it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nSamuel Anderson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nAugust: School: Saint Vincent College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nJohn: School: University of Rhode Island Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nRebecca: School: State University of New York at Albany Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nNeoma: School: Hofstra University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nRonnie: School: National Technological University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nSuzette: School: Utah Valley State College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPenelope: School: Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nFernando: School: St. John's College-Santa Fe Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nVelda: School: Rhode Island College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \n\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hi there, I'm Samuel. Nice party, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello Samuel, I'm Hendrick. Pleasure to meet you. Indeed, I quite enjoy these gatherings too. Have you been attending these kinds of parties long?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Quite a few years actually! I've ended up meeting people from all sort of places, even bumped into some old school classmates sometimes. You ever have run-ins like that, Hendrick?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Samuel! Funny how you cross paths with old classmates in the most unexpected places. Speaking of school, did you attend any college? These schools have such vast networks, you never know where you might find an old classmate.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Yes, I did attend college. In fact, I got to know some really interesting people there. It was through them that I had some amazing experiences such as evening gatherings and indoor games. Did you have similar experiences, Hendrick?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Certainly, Samuel! I also had such memorable experiences in college. Especially, evening gatherings with close friends were quite common. By the way, did you ever attend any college based indoor parties? They can be different yet interesting.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, the indoor parties were always a highlight. I remember going to quite a few in various places on campus. College felt like a small world sometimes, didn't it?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, it's extraordinary how close-knit the college community can feel. Samuel, perhaps you might know some of my friends who also enjoy these indoor gatherings. Did you perhaps attend Southampton College or Antioch University-Los Angeles? They had quite the scene for indoor activities.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Can't say that I went to those exact institutions, Hendrick, but it's remarkable how similar our experiences sound. I used to know a friend from Texas A&M University in Corpus Christi who had a strong preference for indoor gathering too, same as my friend from Rhode Island College. Any chance you know people from those schools?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nSamuel Anderson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nAugust: School: Saint Vincent College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nJohn: School: University of Rhode Island Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nRebecca: School: State University of New York at Albany Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nNeoma: School: Hofstra University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nRonnie: School: National Technological University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nSuzette: School: Utah Valley State College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPenelope: School: Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nFernando: School: St. John's College-Santa Fe Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nVelda: School: Rhode Island College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \n\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hi there, I'm Samuel. Nice party, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello Samuel, I'm Hendrick. Pleasure to meet you. Indeed, I quite enjoy these gatherings too. Have you been attending these kinds of parties long?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Quite a few years actually! I've ended up meeting people from all sort of places, even bumped into some old school classmates sometimes. You ever have run-ins like that, Hendrick?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Samuel! Funny how you cross paths with old classmates in the most unexpected places. Speaking of school, did you attend any college? These schools have such vast networks, you never know where you might find an old classmate.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Yes, I did attend college. In fact, I got to know some really interesting people there. It was through them that I had some amazing experiences such as evening gatherings and indoor games. Did you have similar experiences, Hendrick?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Certainly, Samuel! I also had such memorable experiences in college. Especially, evening gatherings with close friends were quite common. By the way, did you ever attend any college based indoor parties? They can be different yet interesting.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, the indoor parties were always a highlight. I remember going to quite a few in various places on campus. College felt like a small world sometimes, didn't it?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, it's extraordinary how close-knit the college community can feel. Samuel, perhaps you might know some of my friends who also enjoy these indoor gatherings. Did you perhaps attend Southampton College or Antioch University-Los Angeles? They had quite the scene for indoor activities.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Can't say that I went to those exact institutions, Hendrick, but it's remarkable how similar our experiences sound. I used to know a friend from Texas A&M University in Corpus Christi who had a strong preference for indoor gathering too, same as my friend from Rhode Island College. Any chance you know people from those schools?\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, Texas A&M University in Corpus Christi and Rhode Island College? I can't say I know anyone from there personally, but it's fascinating how these college experiences can be so universal. Did any of these friends of yours also have a knack for culinary arts or maybe enjoyed wine-tasting? I've been hosting wine tasting nights for a bit and I've met a fair share of people from different colleges you wouldn't believe!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's funny you should mention that, Hendrick! Actually, I do happen to know a couple of friends who really enjoy culinary arts. One could easily mistake our gatherings for a miniature food festival. Do you have friends like that who make get-togethers extra special with their cooking?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nSamuel Anderson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nAugust: School: Saint Vincent College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nJohn: School: University of Rhode Island Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nRebecca: School: State University of New York at Albany Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nNeoma: School: Hofstra University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nRonnie: School: National Technological University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nSuzette: School: Utah Valley State College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPenelope: School: Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nFernando: School: St. John's College-Santa Fe Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nVelda: School: Rhode Island College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \n\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hi there, I'm Samuel. Nice party, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello Samuel, I'm Hendrick. Pleasure to meet you. Indeed, I quite enjoy these gatherings too. Have you been attending these kinds of parties long?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Quite a few years actually! I've ended up meeting people from all sort of places, even bumped into some old school classmates sometimes. You ever have run-ins like that, Hendrick?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Samuel! Funny how you cross paths with old classmates in the most unexpected places. Speaking of school, did you attend any college? These schools have such vast networks, you never know where you might find an old classmate.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Yes, I did attend college. In fact, I got to know some really interesting people there. It was through them that I had some amazing experiences such as evening gatherings and indoor games. Did you have similar experiences, Hendrick?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Certainly, Samuel! I also had such memorable experiences in college. Especially, evening gatherings with close friends were quite common. By the way, did you ever attend any college based indoor parties? They can be different yet interesting.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, the indoor parties were always a highlight. I remember going to quite a few in various places on campus. College felt like a small world sometimes, didn't it?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, it's extraordinary how close-knit the college community can feel. Samuel, perhaps you might know some of my friends who also enjoy these indoor gatherings. Did you perhaps attend Southampton College or Antioch University-Los Angeles? They had quite the scene for indoor activities.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Can't say that I went to those exact institutions, Hendrick, but it's remarkable how similar our experiences sound. I used to know a friend from Texas A&M University in Corpus Christi who had a strong preference for indoor gathering too, same as my friend from Rhode Island College. Any chance you know people from those schools?\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, Texas A&M University in Corpus Christi and Rhode Island College? I can't say I know anyone from there personally, but it's fascinating how these college experiences can be so universal. Did any of these friends of yours also have a knack for culinary arts or maybe enjoyed wine-tasting? I've been hosting wine tasting nights for a bit and I've met a fair share of people from different colleges you wouldn't believe!\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's funny you should mention that, Hendrick! Actually, I do happen to know a couple of friends who really enjoy culinary arts. One could easily mistake our gatherings for a miniature food festival. Do you have friends like that who make get-togethers extra special with their cooking?\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Well it's funny that you should say that Samuel. I do have a friend, Lucille, a graduate of Southampton College, who not only loves indoor gatherings but is an amazing cook. We sometimes collaborate on menus for our gatherings. And on other occasions, Alyssa from Davidson College, another indoor gatherings enthusiast, wows us with her distinctive dishes. It's like having our own little gourmet festival.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds delightful, Hendrick. Collaboration on a menu for gatherings must be great fun. Speaking of such cooks, one of my friends, Ronnie, went to the National Technological University. Ronnie's got a gifted hand in the kitchen. I wonder if your gatherings have ever crossed paths with Ronnie's flavor-filled events?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nSamuel Anderson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nAugust: School: Saint Vincent College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nJohn: School: University of Rhode Island Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nRebecca: School: State University of New York at Albany Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nNeoma: School: Hofstra University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nRonnie: School: National Technological University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nSuzette: School: Utah Valley State College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPenelope: School: Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nFernando: School: St. John's College-Santa Fe Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nVelda: School: Rhode Island College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \n\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hi there, I'm Samuel. Nice party, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello Samuel, I'm Hendrick. Pleasure to meet you. Indeed, I quite enjoy these gatherings too. Have you been attending these kinds of parties long?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Quite a few years actually! I've ended up meeting people from all sort of places, even bumped into some old school classmates sometimes. You ever have run-ins like that, Hendrick?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Samuel! Funny how you cross paths with old classmates in the most unexpected places. Speaking of school, did you attend any college? These schools have such vast networks, you never know where you might find an old classmate.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Yes, I did attend college. In fact, I got to know some really interesting people there. It was through them that I had some amazing experiences such as evening gatherings and indoor games. Did you have similar experiences, Hendrick?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Certainly, Samuel! I also had such memorable experiences in college. Especially, evening gatherings with close friends were quite common. By the way, did you ever attend any college based indoor parties? They can be different yet interesting.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, the indoor parties were always a highlight. I remember going to quite a few in various places on campus. College felt like a small world sometimes, didn't it?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, it's extraordinary how close-knit the college community can feel. Samuel, perhaps you might know some of my friends who also enjoy these indoor gatherings. Did you perhaps attend Southampton College or Antioch University-Los Angeles? They had quite the scene for indoor activities.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Can't say that I went to those exact institutions, Hendrick, but it's remarkable how similar our experiences sound. I used to know a friend from Texas A&M University in Corpus Christi who had a strong preference for indoor gathering too, same as my friend from Rhode Island College. Any chance you know people from those schools?\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, Texas A&M University in Corpus Christi and Rhode Island College? I can't say I know anyone from there personally, but it's fascinating how these college experiences can be so universal. Did any of these friends of yours also have a knack for culinary arts or maybe enjoyed wine-tasting? I've been hosting wine tasting nights for a bit and I've met a fair share of people from different colleges you wouldn't believe!\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's funny you should mention that, Hendrick! Actually, I do happen to know a couple of friends who really enjoy culinary arts. One could easily mistake our gatherings for a miniature food festival. Do you have friends like that who make get-togethers extra special with their cooking?\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Well it's funny that you should say that Samuel. I do have a friend, Lucille, a graduate of Southampton College, who not only loves indoor gatherings but is an amazing cook. We sometimes collaborate on menus for our gatherings. And on other occasions, Alyssa from Davidson College, another indoor gatherings enthusiast, wows us with her distinctive dishes. It's like having our own little gourmet festival.\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"That sounds delightful, Hendrick. Collaboration on a menu for gatherings must be great fun. Speaking of such cooks, one of my friends, Ronnie, went to the National Technological University. Ronnie's got a gifted hand in the kitchen. I wonder if your gatherings have ever crossed paths with Ronnie's flavor-filled events?\"\n\nTurn #13: Hendrick Heinz said: \"National Technological University, you say? I can't recall any acquaintance from there. But Ronnie sounds like an exceptional cook; good food brings people together, doesn't it? Have you ever hosted or been to a wine-tasting evening? It might seem random, but many of my friends who enjoy the culinary arts also share a love for tasting and appreciating good wines.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Wine-tasting evenings sound like excellent fun, Hendrick! I can't say I've hosted one myself, but I do recall a friend I know, Suzette, who studied at Utah Valley State College. She's a big fan of organized wine tastings. It's amazing the variety of people we can meet through shared interests. Maybe you've crossed paths?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nSamuel Anderson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nAugust: School: Saint Vincent College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nJohn: School: University of Rhode Island Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nRebecca: School: State University of New York at Albany Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nNeoma: School: Hofstra University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nRonnie: School: National Technological University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nSuzette: School: Utah Valley State College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPenelope: School: Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nFernando: School: St. John's College-Santa Fe Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nVelda: School: Rhode Island College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \n\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hi there, I'm Samuel. Nice party, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello Samuel, I'm Hendrick. Pleasure to meet you. Indeed, I quite enjoy these gatherings too. Have you been attending these kinds of parties long?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Quite a few years actually! I've ended up meeting people from all sort of places, even bumped into some old school classmates sometimes. You ever have run-ins like that, Hendrick?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Samuel! Funny how you cross paths with old classmates in the most unexpected places. Speaking of school, did you attend any college? These schools have such vast networks, you never know where you might find an old classmate.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Yes, I did attend college. In fact, I got to know some really interesting people there. It was through them that I had some amazing experiences such as evening gatherings and indoor games. Did you have similar experiences, Hendrick?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Certainly, Samuel! I also had such memorable experiences in college. Especially, evening gatherings with close friends were quite common. By the way, did you ever attend any college based indoor parties? They can be different yet interesting.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, the indoor parties were always a highlight. I remember going to quite a few in various places on campus. College felt like a small world sometimes, didn't it?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, it's extraordinary how close-knit the college community can feel. Samuel, perhaps you might know some of my friends who also enjoy these indoor gatherings. Did you perhaps attend Southampton College or Antioch University-Los Angeles? They had quite the scene for indoor activities.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Can't say that I went to those exact institutions, Hendrick, but it's remarkable how similar our experiences sound. I used to know a friend from Texas A&M University in Corpus Christi who had a strong preference for indoor gathering too, same as my friend from Rhode Island College. Any chance you know people from those schools?\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, Texas A&M University in Corpus Christi and Rhode Island College? I can't say I know anyone from there personally, but it's fascinating how these college experiences can be so universal. Did any of these friends of yours also have a knack for culinary arts or maybe enjoyed wine-tasting? I've been hosting wine tasting nights for a bit and I've met a fair share of people from different colleges you wouldn't believe!\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's funny you should mention that, Hendrick! Actually, I do happen to know a couple of friends who really enjoy culinary arts. One could easily mistake our gatherings for a miniature food festival. Do you have friends like that who make get-togethers extra special with their cooking?\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Well it's funny that you should say that Samuel. I do have a friend, Lucille, a graduate of Southampton College, who not only loves indoor gatherings but is an amazing cook. We sometimes collaborate on menus for our gatherings. And on other occasions, Alyssa from Davidson College, another indoor gatherings enthusiast, wows us with her distinctive dishes. It's like having our own little gourmet festival.\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"That sounds delightful, Hendrick. Collaboration on a menu for gatherings must be great fun. Speaking of such cooks, one of my friends, Ronnie, went to the National Technological University. Ronnie's got a gifted hand in the kitchen. I wonder if your gatherings have ever crossed paths with Ronnie's flavor-filled events?\"\n\nTurn #13: Hendrick Heinz said: \"National Technological University, you say? I can't recall any acquaintance from there. But Ronnie sounds like an exceptional cook; good food brings people together, doesn't it? Have you ever hosted or been to a wine-tasting evening? It might seem random, but many of my friends who enjoy the culinary arts also share a love for tasting and appreciating good wines.\"\n\nTurn #14: Samuel Anderson said: \"Wine-tasting evenings sound like excellent fun, Hendrick! I can't say I've hosted one myself, but I do recall a friend I know, Suzette, who studied at Utah Valley State College. She's a big fan of organized wine tastings. It's amazing the variety of people we can meet through shared interests. Maybe you've crossed paths?\"\n\nTurn #15: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Suzette from Utah Valley State College, you say? I can't seem to recall crossing paths with her. But the beauty of these interests is that they can bring together like-minded people from various walks of life. I guess that's what makes gatherings, be it food festivals or wine-tasting sessions, so enriching and enjoyable!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, Hendrick! It's so exciting to discover new people through shared interests. I must say I am particularly fond of spontaneous plans. Well, did any of your friends study at St. John's College-Santa Fe? My friend Fernando from there also loves indoor gatherings but prefers the ones outdoors. Maybe Fernando's outdoor events might ring a bell?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nSamuel Anderson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nAugust: School: Saint Vincent College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nJohn: School: University of Rhode Island Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nRebecca: School: State University of New York at Albany Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nNeoma: School: Hofstra University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nRonnie: School: National Technological University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nSuzette: School: Utah Valley State College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPenelope: School: Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nFernando: School: St. John's College-Santa Fe Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nVelda: School: Rhode Island College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \n\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hi there, I'm Samuel. Nice party, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello Samuel, I'm Hendrick. Pleasure to meet you. Indeed, I quite enjoy these gatherings too. Have you been attending these kinds of parties long?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Quite a few years actually! I've ended up meeting people from all sort of places, even bumped into some old school classmates sometimes. You ever have run-ins like that, Hendrick?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Samuel! Funny how you cross paths with old classmates in the most unexpected places. Speaking of school, did you attend any college? These schools have such vast networks, you never know where you might find an old classmate.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Yes, I did attend college. In fact, I got to know some really interesting people there. It was through them that I had some amazing experiences such as evening gatherings and indoor games. Did you have similar experiences, Hendrick?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Certainly, Samuel! I also had such memorable experiences in college. Especially, evening gatherings with close friends were quite common. By the way, did you ever attend any college based indoor parties? They can be different yet interesting.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, the indoor parties were always a highlight. I remember going to quite a few in various places on campus. College felt like a small world sometimes, didn't it?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, it's extraordinary how close-knit the college community can feel. Samuel, perhaps you might know some of my friends who also enjoy these indoor gatherings. Did you perhaps attend Southampton College or Antioch University-Los Angeles? They had quite the scene for indoor activities.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Can't say that I went to those exact institutions, Hendrick, but it's remarkable how similar our experiences sound. I used to know a friend from Texas A&M University in Corpus Christi who had a strong preference for indoor gathering too, same as my friend from Rhode Island College. Any chance you know people from those schools?\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, Texas A&M University in Corpus Christi and Rhode Island College? I can't say I know anyone from there personally, but it's fascinating how these college experiences can be so universal. Did any of these friends of yours also have a knack for culinary arts or maybe enjoyed wine-tasting? I've been hosting wine tasting nights for a bit and I've met a fair share of people from different colleges you wouldn't believe!\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's funny you should mention that, Hendrick! Actually, I do happen to know a couple of friends who really enjoy culinary arts. One could easily mistake our gatherings for a miniature food festival. Do you have friends like that who make get-togethers extra special with their cooking?\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Well it's funny that you should say that Samuel. I do have a friend, Lucille, a graduate of Southampton College, who not only loves indoor gatherings but is an amazing cook. We sometimes collaborate on menus for our gatherings. And on other occasions, Alyssa from Davidson College, another indoor gatherings enthusiast, wows us with her distinctive dishes. It's like having our own little gourmet festival.\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"That sounds delightful, Hendrick. Collaboration on a menu for gatherings must be great fun. Speaking of such cooks, one of my friends, Ronnie, went to the National Technological University. Ronnie's got a gifted hand in the kitchen. I wonder if your gatherings have ever crossed paths with Ronnie's flavor-filled events?\"\n\nTurn #13: Hendrick Heinz said: \"National Technological University, you say? I can't recall any acquaintance from there. But Ronnie sounds like an exceptional cook; good food brings people together, doesn't it? Have you ever hosted or been to a wine-tasting evening? It might seem random, but many of my friends who enjoy the culinary arts also share a love for tasting and appreciating good wines.\"\n\nTurn #14: Samuel Anderson said: \"Wine-tasting evenings sound like excellent fun, Hendrick! I can't say I've hosted one myself, but I do recall a friend I know, Suzette, who studied at Utah Valley State College. She's a big fan of organized wine tastings. It's amazing the variety of people we can meet through shared interests. Maybe you've crossed paths?\"\n\nTurn #15: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Suzette from Utah Valley State College, you say? I can't seem to recall crossing paths with her. But the beauty of these interests is that they can bring together like-minded people from various walks of life. I guess that's what makes gatherings, be it food festivals or wine-tasting sessions, so enriching and enjoyable!\"\n\nTurn #16: Samuel Anderson said: \"Indeed, Hendrick! It's so exciting to discover new people through shared interests. I must say I am particularly fond of spontaneous plans. Well, did any of your friends study at St. John's College-Santa Fe? My friend Fernando from there also loves indoor gatherings but prefers the ones outdoors. Maybe Fernando's outdoor events might ring a bell?\"\n\nTurn #17: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, St. John's College-Santa Fe? You know, I believe I do know someone! My friend Betty, a connoisseur of all things vintage, graduated from there. She loves indoor gatherings but tastes wine under the open sky. It's quite possible she might have attended one of Fernando's outdoor events! The world sure is small, isn't it, Samuel?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #18. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, Hendrick! It truly is a small world. It's quite possible Fernando and Betty have crossed paths. Although, I must confess something interesting about myself. Apart from being a software developer, I was once a competitive figure skater. Maybe we know someone in common from that circle as well?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nTiffany: School: Saint Vincent College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nLucille: School: Southampton College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nJames: School: University of Wisconsin-River Falls Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nQuinn: School: Antioch University-Los Angeles Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nAlyssa: School: Davidson College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nBetty: School: St. John's College-Santa Fe Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nNeoma: School: Hofstra University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nWilliam: School: State University of New York at Albany Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nVictoria: School: Montana Tech Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hi there, I'm Samuel. Nice party, isn't it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hello Samuel, I'm Hendrick. Pleasure to meet you. Indeed, I quite enjoy these gatherings too. Have you been attending these kinds of parties long?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nTiffany: School: Saint Vincent College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nLucille: School: Southampton College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nJames: School: University of Wisconsin-River Falls Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nQuinn: School: Antioch University-Los Angeles Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nAlyssa: School: Davidson College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nBetty: School: St. John's College-Santa Fe Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nNeoma: School: Hofstra University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nWilliam: School: State University of New York at Albany Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nVictoria: School: Montana Tech Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hi there, I'm Samuel. Nice party, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello Samuel, I'm Hendrick. Pleasure to meet you. Indeed, I quite enjoy these gatherings too. Have you been attending these kinds of parties long?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Quite a few years actually! I've ended up meeting people from all sort of places, even bumped into some old school classmates sometimes. You ever have run-ins like that, Hendrick?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Absolutely, Samuel! Funny how you cross paths with old classmates in the most unexpected places. Speaking of school, did you attend any college? These schools have such vast networks, you never know where you might find an old classmate.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nTiffany: School: Saint Vincent College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nLucille: School: Southampton College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nJames: School: University of Wisconsin-River Falls Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nQuinn: School: Antioch University-Los Angeles Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nAlyssa: School: Davidson College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nBetty: School: St. John's College-Santa Fe Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nNeoma: School: Hofstra University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nWilliam: School: State University of New York at Albany Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nVictoria: School: Montana Tech Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hi there, I'm Samuel. Nice party, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello Samuel, I'm Hendrick. Pleasure to meet you. Indeed, I quite enjoy these gatherings too. Have you been attending these kinds of parties long?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Quite a few years actually! I've ended up meeting people from all sort of places, even bumped into some old school classmates sometimes. You ever have run-ins like that, Hendrick?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Samuel! Funny how you cross paths with old classmates in the most unexpected places. Speaking of school, did you attend any college? These schools have such vast networks, you never know where you might find an old classmate.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Yes, I did attend college. In fact, I got to know some really interesting people there. It was through them that I had some amazing experiences such as evening gatherings and indoor games. Did you have similar experiences, Hendrick?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Certainly, Samuel! I also had such memorable experiences in college. Especially, evening gatherings with close friends were quite common. By the way, did you ever attend any college based indoor parties? They can be different yet interesting.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, the indoor parties were always a highlight. I remember going to quite a few in various places on campus. College felt like a small world sometimes, didn't it?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, it's extraordinary how close-knit the college community can feel. Samuel, perhaps you might know some of my friends who also enjoy these indoor gatherings. Did you perhaps attend Southampton College or Antioch University-Los Angeles? They had quite the scene for indoor activities.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Can't say that I went to those exact institutions, Hendrick, but it's remarkable how similar our experiences sound. I used to know a friend from Texas A&M University in Corpus Christi who had a strong preference for indoor gathering too, same as my friend from Rhode Island College. Any chance you know people from those schools?\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, Texas A&M University in Corpus Christi and Rhode Island College? I can't say I know anyone from there personally, but it's fascinating how these college experiences can be so universal. Did any of these friends of yours also have a knack for culinary arts or maybe enjoyed wine-tasting? I've been hosting wine tasting nights for a bit and I've met a fair share of people from different colleges you wouldn't believe!\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's funny you should mention that, Hendrick! Actually, I do happen to know a couple of friends who really enjoy culinary arts. One could easily mistake our gatherings for a miniature food festival. Do you have friends like that who make get-togethers extra special with their cooking?\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Well it's funny that you should say that Samuel. I do have a friend, Lucille, a graduate of Southampton College, who not only loves indoor gatherings but is an amazing cook. We sometimes collaborate on menus for our gatherings. And on other occasions, Alyssa from Davidson College, another indoor gatherings enthusiast, wows us with her distinctive dishes. It's like having our own little gourmet festival.\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"That sounds delightful, Hendrick. Collaboration on a menu for gatherings must be great fun. Speaking of such cooks, one of my friends, Ronnie, went to the National Technological University. Ronnie's got a gifted hand in the kitchen. I wonder if your gatherings have ever crossed paths with Ronnie's flavor-filled events?\"\n\nTurn #13: Hendrick Heinz said: \"National Technological University, you say? I can't recall any acquaintance from there. But Ronnie sounds like an exceptional cook; good food brings people together, doesn't it? Have you ever hosted or been to a wine-tasting evening? It might seem random, but many of my friends who enjoy the culinary arts also share a love for tasting and appreciating good wines.\"\n\nTurn #14: Samuel Anderson said: \"Wine-tasting evenings sound like excellent fun, Hendrick! I can't say I've hosted one myself, but I do recall a friend I know, Suzette, who studied at Utah Valley State College. She's a big fan of organized wine tastings. It's amazing the variety of people we can meet through shared interests. Maybe you've crossed paths?\"\n\nTurn #15: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Suzette from Utah Valley State College, you say? I can't seem to recall crossing paths with her. But the beauty of these interests is that they can bring together like-minded people from various walks of life. I guess that's what makes gatherings, be it food festivals or wine-tasting sessions, so enriching and enjoyable!\"\n\nTurn #16: Samuel Anderson said: \"Indeed, Hendrick! It's so exciting to discover new people through shared interests. I must say I am particularly fond of spontaneous plans. Well, did any of your friends study at St. John's College-Santa Fe? My friend Fernando from there also loves indoor gatherings but prefers the ones outdoors. Maybe Fernando's outdoor events might ring a bell?\"\n\nTurn #17: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, St. John's College-Santa Fe? You know, I believe I do know someone! My friend Betty, a connoisseur of all things vintage, graduated from there. She loves indoor gatherings but tastes wine under the open sky. It's quite possible she might have attended one of Fernando's outdoor events! The world sure is small, isn't it, Samuel?\"\n\nTurn #18: Samuel Anderson said: \"Indeed, Hendrick! It truly is a small world. It's quite possible Fernando and Betty have crossed paths. Although, I must confess something interesting about myself. Apart from being a software developer, I was once a competitive figure skater. Maybe we know someone in common from that circle as well?\"\n\nTurn #19: Hendrick Heinz said: \"A competitive figure skater, that's quite impressive Samuel! Among my friends, I don't recall anyone specifically from the skating community. But as you rightly pointed out, it's quite possible that we may share acquaintances from unexpected circles as well. Remarkable, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #20: Samuel Anderson left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #21. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nTiffany: School: Saint Vincent College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nLucille: School: Southampton College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nJames: School: University of Wisconsin-River Falls Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nQuinn: School: Antioch University-Los Angeles Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nAlyssa: School: Davidson College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nBetty: School: St. John's College-Santa Fe Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nNeoma: School: Hofstra University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nWilliam: School: State University of New York at Albany Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nVictoria: School: Montana Tech Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hi there, I'm Samuel. Nice party, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello Samuel, I'm Hendrick. Pleasure to meet you. Indeed, I quite enjoy these gatherings too. Have you been attending these kinds of parties long?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Quite a few years actually! I've ended up meeting people from all sort of places, even bumped into some old school classmates sometimes. You ever have run-ins like that, Hendrick?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Samuel! Funny how you cross paths with old classmates in the most unexpected places. Speaking of school, did you attend any college? These schools have such vast networks, you never know where you might find an old classmate.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Yes, I did attend college. In fact, I got to know some really interesting people there. It was through them that I had some amazing experiences such as evening gatherings and indoor games. Did you have similar experiences, Hendrick?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Certainly, Samuel! I also had such memorable experiences in college. Especially, evening gatherings with close friends were quite common. By the way, did you ever attend any college based indoor parties? They can be different yet interesting.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nTiffany: School: Saint Vincent College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nLucille: School: Southampton College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nJames: School: University of Wisconsin-River Falls Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nQuinn: School: Antioch University-Los Angeles Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nAlyssa: School: Davidson College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nBetty: School: St. John's College-Santa Fe Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nNeoma: School: Hofstra University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nWilliam: School: State University of New York at Albany Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nVictoria: School: Montana Tech Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hi there, I'm Samuel. Nice party, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello Samuel, I'm Hendrick. Pleasure to meet you. Indeed, I quite enjoy these gatherings too. Have you been attending these kinds of parties long?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Quite a few years actually! I've ended up meeting people from all sort of places, even bumped into some old school classmates sometimes. You ever have run-ins like that, Hendrick?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Samuel! Funny how you cross paths with old classmates in the most unexpected places. Speaking of school, did you attend any college? These schools have such vast networks, you never know where you might find an old classmate.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Yes, I did attend college. In fact, I got to know some really interesting people there. It was through them that I had some amazing experiences such as evening gatherings and indoor games. Did you have similar experiences, Hendrick?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Certainly, Samuel! I also had such memorable experiences in college. Especially, evening gatherings with close friends were quite common. By the way, did you ever attend any college based indoor parties? They can be different yet interesting.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, the indoor parties were always a highlight. I remember going to quite a few in various places on campus. College felt like a small world sometimes, didn't it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, it's extraordinary how close-knit the college community can feel. Samuel, perhaps you might know some of my friends who also enjoy these indoor gatherings. Did you perhaps attend Southampton College or Antioch University-Los Angeles? They had quite the scene for indoor activities.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nTiffany: School: Saint Vincent College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nLucille: School: Southampton College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nJames: School: University of Wisconsin-River Falls Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nQuinn: School: Antioch University-Los Angeles Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nAlyssa: School: Davidson College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nBetty: School: St. John's College-Santa Fe Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nNeoma: School: Hofstra University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nWilliam: School: State University of New York at Albany Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nVictoria: School: Montana Tech Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hi there, I'm Samuel. Nice party, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello Samuel, I'm Hendrick. Pleasure to meet you. Indeed, I quite enjoy these gatherings too. Have you been attending these kinds of parties long?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Quite a few years actually! I've ended up meeting people from all sort of places, even bumped into some old school classmates sometimes. You ever have run-ins like that, Hendrick?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Samuel! Funny how you cross paths with old classmates in the most unexpected places. Speaking of school, did you attend any college? These schools have such vast networks, you never know where you might find an old classmate.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Yes, I did attend college. In fact, I got to know some really interesting people there. It was through them that I had some amazing experiences such as evening gatherings and indoor games. Did you have similar experiences, Hendrick?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Certainly, Samuel! I also had such memorable experiences in college. Especially, evening gatherings with close friends were quite common. By the way, did you ever attend any college based indoor parties? They can be different yet interesting.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, the indoor parties were always a highlight. I remember going to quite a few in various places on campus. College felt like a small world sometimes, didn't it?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, it's extraordinary how close-knit the college community can feel. Samuel, perhaps you might know some of my friends who also enjoy these indoor gatherings. Did you perhaps attend Southampton College or Antioch University-Los Angeles? They had quite the scene for indoor activities.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Can't say that I went to those exact institutions, Hendrick, but it's remarkable how similar our experiences sound. I used to know a friend from Texas A&M University in Corpus Christi who had a strong preference for indoor gathering too, same as my friend from Rhode Island College. Any chance you know people from those schools?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oh, Texas A&M University in Corpus Christi and Rhode Island College? I can't say I know anyone from there personally, but it's fascinating how these college experiences can be so universal. Did any of these friends of yours also have a knack for culinary arts or maybe enjoyed wine-tasting? I've been hosting wine tasting nights for a bit and I've met a fair share of people from different colleges you wouldn't believe!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nTiffany: School: Saint Vincent College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nLucille: School: Southampton College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nJames: School: University of Wisconsin-River Falls Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nQuinn: School: Antioch University-Los Angeles Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nAlyssa: School: Davidson College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nBetty: School: St. John's College-Santa Fe Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nNeoma: School: Hofstra University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nWilliam: School: State University of New York at Albany Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nVictoria: School: Montana Tech Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hi there, I'm Samuel. Nice party, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello Samuel, I'm Hendrick. Pleasure to meet you. Indeed, I quite enjoy these gatherings too. Have you been attending these kinds of parties long?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Quite a few years actually! I've ended up meeting people from all sort of places, even bumped into some old school classmates sometimes. You ever have run-ins like that, Hendrick?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Samuel! Funny how you cross paths with old classmates in the most unexpected places. Speaking of school, did you attend any college? These schools have such vast networks, you never know where you might find an old classmate.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Yes, I did attend college. In fact, I got to know some really interesting people there. It was through them that I had some amazing experiences such as evening gatherings and indoor games. Did you have similar experiences, Hendrick?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Certainly, Samuel! I also had such memorable experiences in college. Especially, evening gatherings with close friends were quite common. By the way, did you ever attend any college based indoor parties? They can be different yet interesting.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, the indoor parties were always a highlight. I remember going to quite a few in various places on campus. College felt like a small world sometimes, didn't it?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, it's extraordinary how close-knit the college community can feel. Samuel, perhaps you might know some of my friends who also enjoy these indoor gatherings. Did you perhaps attend Southampton College or Antioch University-Los Angeles? They had quite the scene for indoor activities.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Can't say that I went to those exact institutions, Hendrick, but it's remarkable how similar our experiences sound. I used to know a friend from Texas A&M University in Corpus Christi who had a strong preference for indoor gathering too, same as my friend from Rhode Island College. Any chance you know people from those schools?\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, Texas A&M University in Corpus Christi and Rhode Island College? I can't say I know anyone from there personally, but it's fascinating how these college experiences can be so universal. Did any of these friends of yours also have a knack for culinary arts or maybe enjoyed wine-tasting? I've been hosting wine tasting nights for a bit and I've met a fair share of people from different colleges you wouldn't believe!\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's funny you should mention that, Hendrick! Actually, I do happen to know a couple of friends who really enjoy culinary arts. One could easily mistake our gatherings for a miniature food festival. Do you have friends like that who make get-togethers extra special with their cooking?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Well it's funny that you should say that Samuel. I do have a friend, Lucille, a graduate of Southampton College, who not only loves indoor gatherings but is an amazing cook. We sometimes collaborate on menus for our gatherings. And on other occasions, Alyssa from Davidson College, another indoor gatherings enthusiast, wows us with her distinctive dishes. It's like having our own little gourmet festival.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nTiffany: School: Saint Vincent College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nLucille: School: Southampton College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nJames: School: University of Wisconsin-River Falls Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nQuinn: School: Antioch University-Los Angeles Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nAlyssa: School: Davidson College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nBetty: School: St. John's College-Santa Fe Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nNeoma: School: Hofstra University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nWilliam: School: State University of New York at Albany Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nVictoria: School: Montana Tech Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hi there, I'm Samuel. Nice party, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello Samuel, I'm Hendrick. Pleasure to meet you. Indeed, I quite enjoy these gatherings too. Have you been attending these kinds of parties long?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Quite a few years actually! I've ended up meeting people from all sort of places, even bumped into some old school classmates sometimes. You ever have run-ins like that, Hendrick?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Samuel! Funny how you cross paths with old classmates in the most unexpected places. Speaking of school, did you attend any college? These schools have such vast networks, you never know where you might find an old classmate.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Yes, I did attend college. In fact, I got to know some really interesting people there. It was through them that I had some amazing experiences such as evening gatherings and indoor games. Did you have similar experiences, Hendrick?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Certainly, Samuel! I also had such memorable experiences in college. Especially, evening gatherings with close friends were quite common. By the way, did you ever attend any college based indoor parties? They can be different yet interesting.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, the indoor parties were always a highlight. I remember going to quite a few in various places on campus. College felt like a small world sometimes, didn't it?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, it's extraordinary how close-knit the college community can feel. Samuel, perhaps you might know some of my friends who also enjoy these indoor gatherings. Did you perhaps attend Southampton College or Antioch University-Los Angeles? They had quite the scene for indoor activities.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Can't say that I went to those exact institutions, Hendrick, but it's remarkable how similar our experiences sound. I used to know a friend from Texas A&M University in Corpus Christi who had a strong preference for indoor gathering too, same as my friend from Rhode Island College. Any chance you know people from those schools?\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, Texas A&M University in Corpus Christi and Rhode Island College? I can't say I know anyone from there personally, but it's fascinating how these college experiences can be so universal. Did any of these friends of yours also have a knack for culinary arts or maybe enjoyed wine-tasting? I've been hosting wine tasting nights for a bit and I've met a fair share of people from different colleges you wouldn't believe!\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's funny you should mention that, Hendrick! Actually, I do happen to know a couple of friends who really enjoy culinary arts. One could easily mistake our gatherings for a miniature food festival. Do you have friends like that who make get-togethers extra special with their cooking?\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Well it's funny that you should say that Samuel. I do have a friend, Lucille, a graduate of Southampton College, who not only loves indoor gatherings but is an amazing cook. We sometimes collaborate on menus for our gatherings. And on other occasions, Alyssa from Davidson College, another indoor gatherings enthusiast, wows us with her distinctive dishes. It's like having our own little gourmet festival.\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"That sounds delightful, Hendrick. Collaboration on a menu for gatherings must be great fun. Speaking of such cooks, one of my friends, Ronnie, went to the National Technological University. Ronnie's got a gifted hand in the kitchen. I wonder if your gatherings have ever crossed paths with Ronnie's flavor-filled events?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"National Technological University, you say? I can't recall any acquaintance from there. But Ronnie sounds like an exceptional cook; good food brings people together, doesn't it? Have you ever hosted or been to a wine-tasting evening? It might seem random, but many of my friends who enjoy the culinary arts also share a love for tasting and appreciating good wines.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nTiffany: School: Saint Vincent College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nLucille: School: Southampton College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nJames: School: University of Wisconsin-River Falls Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nQuinn: School: Antioch University-Los Angeles Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nAlyssa: School: Davidson College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nBetty: School: St. John's College-Santa Fe Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nNeoma: School: Hofstra University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nWilliam: School: State University of New York at Albany Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nVictoria: School: Montana Tech Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hi there, I'm Samuel. Nice party, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello Samuel, I'm Hendrick. Pleasure to meet you. Indeed, I quite enjoy these gatherings too. Have you been attending these kinds of parties long?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Quite a few years actually! I've ended up meeting people from all sort of places, even bumped into some old school classmates sometimes. You ever have run-ins like that, Hendrick?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Samuel! Funny how you cross paths with old classmates in the most unexpected places. Speaking of school, did you attend any college? These schools have such vast networks, you never know where you might find an old classmate.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Yes, I did attend college. In fact, I got to know some really interesting people there. It was through them that I had some amazing experiences such as evening gatherings and indoor games. Did you have similar experiences, Hendrick?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Certainly, Samuel! I also had such memorable experiences in college. Especially, evening gatherings with close friends were quite common. By the way, did you ever attend any college based indoor parties? They can be different yet interesting.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, the indoor parties were always a highlight. I remember going to quite a few in various places on campus. College felt like a small world sometimes, didn't it?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, it's extraordinary how close-knit the college community can feel. Samuel, perhaps you might know some of my friends who also enjoy these indoor gatherings. Did you perhaps attend Southampton College or Antioch University-Los Angeles? They had quite the scene for indoor activities.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Can't say that I went to those exact institutions, Hendrick, but it's remarkable how similar our experiences sound. I used to know a friend from Texas A&M University in Corpus Christi who had a strong preference for indoor gathering too, same as my friend from Rhode Island College. Any chance you know people from those schools?\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, Texas A&M University in Corpus Christi and Rhode Island College? I can't say I know anyone from there personally, but it's fascinating how these college experiences can be so universal. Did any of these friends of yours also have a knack for culinary arts or maybe enjoyed wine-tasting? I've been hosting wine tasting nights for a bit and I've met a fair share of people from different colleges you wouldn't believe!\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's funny you should mention that, Hendrick! Actually, I do happen to know a couple of friends who really enjoy culinary arts. One could easily mistake our gatherings for a miniature food festival. Do you have friends like that who make get-togethers extra special with their cooking?\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Well it's funny that you should say that Samuel. I do have a friend, Lucille, a graduate of Southampton College, who not only loves indoor gatherings but is an amazing cook. We sometimes collaborate on menus for our gatherings. And on other occasions, Alyssa from Davidson College, another indoor gatherings enthusiast, wows us with her distinctive dishes. It's like having our own little gourmet festival.\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"That sounds delightful, Hendrick. Collaboration on a menu for gatherings must be great fun. Speaking of such cooks, one of my friends, Ronnie, went to the National Technological University. Ronnie's got a gifted hand in the kitchen. I wonder if your gatherings have ever crossed paths with Ronnie's flavor-filled events?\"\n\nTurn #13: Hendrick Heinz said: \"National Technological University, you say? I can't recall any acquaintance from there. But Ronnie sounds like an exceptional cook; good food brings people together, doesn't it? Have you ever hosted or been to a wine-tasting evening? It might seem random, but many of my friends who enjoy the culinary arts also share a love for tasting and appreciating good wines.\"\n\nTurn #14: Samuel Anderson said: \"Wine-tasting evenings sound like excellent fun, Hendrick! I can't say I've hosted one myself, but I do recall a friend I know, Suzette, who studied at Utah Valley State College. She's a big fan of organized wine tastings. It's amazing the variety of people we can meet through shared interests. Maybe you've crossed paths?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Suzette from Utah Valley State College, you say? I can't seem to recall crossing paths with her. But the beauty of these interests is that they can bring together like-minded people from various walks of life. I guess that's what makes gatherings, be it food festivals or wine-tasting sessions, so enriching and enjoyable!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nTiffany: School: Saint Vincent College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nLucille: School: Southampton College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nJames: School: University of Wisconsin-River Falls Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nQuinn: School: Antioch University-Los Angeles Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nAlyssa: School: Davidson College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nBetty: School: St. John's College-Santa Fe Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nNeoma: School: Hofstra University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nWilliam: School: State University of New York at Albany Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nVictoria: School: Montana Tech Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hi there, I'm Samuel. Nice party, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello Samuel, I'm Hendrick. Pleasure to meet you. Indeed, I quite enjoy these gatherings too. Have you been attending these kinds of parties long?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Quite a few years actually! I've ended up meeting people from all sort of places, even bumped into some old school classmates sometimes. You ever have run-ins like that, Hendrick?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Samuel! Funny how you cross paths with old classmates in the most unexpected places. Speaking of school, did you attend any college? These schools have such vast networks, you never know where you might find an old classmate.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Yes, I did attend college. In fact, I got to know some really interesting people there. It was through them that I had some amazing experiences such as evening gatherings and indoor games. Did you have similar experiences, Hendrick?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Certainly, Samuel! I also had such memorable experiences in college. Especially, evening gatherings with close friends were quite common. By the way, did you ever attend any college based indoor parties? They can be different yet interesting.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, the indoor parties were always a highlight. I remember going to quite a few in various places on campus. College felt like a small world sometimes, didn't it?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, it's extraordinary how close-knit the college community can feel. Samuel, perhaps you might know some of my friends who also enjoy these indoor gatherings. Did you perhaps attend Southampton College or Antioch University-Los Angeles? They had quite the scene for indoor activities.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Can't say that I went to those exact institutions, Hendrick, but it's remarkable how similar our experiences sound. I used to know a friend from Texas A&M University in Corpus Christi who had a strong preference for indoor gathering too, same as my friend from Rhode Island College. Any chance you know people from those schools?\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, Texas A&M University in Corpus Christi and Rhode Island College? I can't say I know anyone from there personally, but it's fascinating how these college experiences can be so universal. Did any of these friends of yours also have a knack for culinary arts or maybe enjoyed wine-tasting? I've been hosting wine tasting nights for a bit and I've met a fair share of people from different colleges you wouldn't believe!\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's funny you should mention that, Hendrick! Actually, I do happen to know a couple of friends who really enjoy culinary arts. One could easily mistake our gatherings for a miniature food festival. Do you have friends like that who make get-togethers extra special with their cooking?\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Well it's funny that you should say that Samuel. I do have a friend, Lucille, a graduate of Southampton College, who not only loves indoor gatherings but is an amazing cook. We sometimes collaborate on menus for our gatherings. And on other occasions, Alyssa from Davidson College, another indoor gatherings enthusiast, wows us with her distinctive dishes. It's like having our own little gourmet festival.\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"That sounds delightful, Hendrick. Collaboration on a menu for gatherings must be great fun. Speaking of such cooks, one of my friends, Ronnie, went to the National Technological University. Ronnie's got a gifted hand in the kitchen. I wonder if your gatherings have ever crossed paths with Ronnie's flavor-filled events?\"\n\nTurn #13: Hendrick Heinz said: \"National Technological University, you say? I can't recall any acquaintance from there. But Ronnie sounds like an exceptional cook; good food brings people together, doesn't it? Have you ever hosted or been to a wine-tasting evening? It might seem random, but many of my friends who enjoy the culinary arts also share a love for tasting and appreciating good wines.\"\n\nTurn #14: Samuel Anderson said: \"Wine-tasting evenings sound like excellent fun, Hendrick! I can't say I've hosted one myself, but I do recall a friend I know, Suzette, who studied at Utah Valley State College. She's a big fan of organized wine tastings. It's amazing the variety of people we can meet through shared interests. Maybe you've crossed paths?\"\n\nTurn #15: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Suzette from Utah Valley State College, you say? I can't seem to recall crossing paths with her. But the beauty of these interests is that they can bring together like-minded people from various walks of life. I guess that's what makes gatherings, be it food festivals or wine-tasting sessions, so enriching and enjoyable!\"\n\nTurn #16: Samuel Anderson said: \"Indeed, Hendrick! It's so exciting to discover new people through shared interests. I must say I am particularly fond of spontaneous plans. Well, did any of your friends study at St. John's College-Santa Fe? My friend Fernando from there also loves indoor gatherings but prefers the ones outdoors. Maybe Fernando's outdoor events might ring a bell?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oh, St. John's College-Santa Fe? You know, I believe I do know someone! My friend Betty, a connoisseur of all things vintage, graduated from there. She loves indoor gatherings but tastes wine under the open sky. It's quite possible she might have attended one of Fernando's outdoor events! The world sure is small, isn't it, Samuel?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nTiffany: School: Saint Vincent College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nLucille: School: Southampton College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nJames: School: University of Wisconsin-River Falls Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nQuinn: School: Antioch University-Los Angeles Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nAlyssa: School: Davidson College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nBetty: School: St. John's College-Santa Fe Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nNeoma: School: Hofstra University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nWilliam: School: State University of New York at Albany Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nVictoria: School: Montana Tech Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hi there, I'm Samuel. Nice party, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello Samuel, I'm Hendrick. Pleasure to meet you. Indeed, I quite enjoy these gatherings too. Have you been attending these kinds of parties long?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Quite a few years actually! I've ended up meeting people from all sort of places, even bumped into some old school classmates sometimes. You ever have run-ins like that, Hendrick?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Samuel! Funny how you cross paths with old classmates in the most unexpected places. Speaking of school, did you attend any college? These schools have such vast networks, you never know where you might find an old classmate.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Yes, I did attend college. In fact, I got to know some really interesting people there. It was through them that I had some amazing experiences such as evening gatherings and indoor games. Did you have similar experiences, Hendrick?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Certainly, Samuel! I also had such memorable experiences in college. Especially, evening gatherings with close friends were quite common. By the way, did you ever attend any college based indoor parties? They can be different yet interesting.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, the indoor parties were always a highlight. I remember going to quite a few in various places on campus. College felt like a small world sometimes, didn't it?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, it's extraordinary how close-knit the college community can feel. Samuel, perhaps you might know some of my friends who also enjoy these indoor gatherings. Did you perhaps attend Southampton College or Antioch University-Los Angeles? They had quite the scene for indoor activities.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Can't say that I went to those exact institutions, Hendrick, but it's remarkable how similar our experiences sound. I used to know a friend from Texas A&M University in Corpus Christi who had a strong preference for indoor gathering too, same as my friend from Rhode Island College. Any chance you know people from those schools?\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, Texas A&M University in Corpus Christi and Rhode Island College? I can't say I know anyone from there personally, but it's fascinating how these college experiences can be so universal. Did any of these friends of yours also have a knack for culinary arts or maybe enjoyed wine-tasting? I've been hosting wine tasting nights for a bit and I've met a fair share of people from different colleges you wouldn't believe!\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's funny you should mention that, Hendrick! Actually, I do happen to know a couple of friends who really enjoy culinary arts. One could easily mistake our gatherings for a miniature food festival. Do you have friends like that who make get-togethers extra special with their cooking?\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Well it's funny that you should say that Samuel. I do have a friend, Lucille, a graduate of Southampton College, who not only loves indoor gatherings but is an amazing cook. We sometimes collaborate on menus for our gatherings. And on other occasions, Alyssa from Davidson College, another indoor gatherings enthusiast, wows us with her distinctive dishes. It's like having our own little gourmet festival.\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"That sounds delightful, Hendrick. Collaboration on a menu for gatherings must be great fun. Speaking of such cooks, one of my friends, Ronnie, went to the National Technological University. Ronnie's got a gifted hand in the kitchen. I wonder if your gatherings have ever crossed paths with Ronnie's flavor-filled events?\"\n\nTurn #13: Hendrick Heinz said: \"National Technological University, you say? I can't recall any acquaintance from there. But Ronnie sounds like an exceptional cook; good food brings people together, doesn't it? Have you ever hosted or been to a wine-tasting evening? It might seem random, but many of my friends who enjoy the culinary arts also share a love for tasting and appreciating good wines.\"\n\nTurn #14: Samuel Anderson said: \"Wine-tasting evenings sound like excellent fun, Hendrick! I can't say I've hosted one myself, but I do recall a friend I know, Suzette, who studied at Utah Valley State College. She's a big fan of organized wine tastings. It's amazing the variety of people we can meet through shared interests. Maybe you've crossed paths?\"\n\nTurn #15: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Suzette from Utah Valley State College, you say? I can't seem to recall crossing paths with her. But the beauty of these interests is that they can bring together like-minded people from various walks of life. I guess that's what makes gatherings, be it food festivals or wine-tasting sessions, so enriching and enjoyable!\"\n\nTurn #16: Samuel Anderson said: \"Indeed, Hendrick! It's so exciting to discover new people through shared interests. I must say I am particularly fond of spontaneous plans. Well, did any of your friends study at St. John's College-Santa Fe? My friend Fernando from there also loves indoor gatherings but prefers the ones outdoors. Maybe Fernando's outdoor events might ring a bell?\"\n\nTurn #17: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, St. John's College-Santa Fe? You know, I believe I do know someone! My friend Betty, a connoisseur of all things vintage, graduated from there. She loves indoor gatherings but tastes wine under the open sky. It's quite possible she might have attended one of Fernando's outdoor events! The world sure is small, isn't it, Samuel?\"\n\nTurn #18: Samuel Anderson said: \"Indeed, Hendrick! It truly is a small world. It's quite possible Fernando and Betty have crossed paths. Although, I must confess something interesting about myself. Apart from being a software developer, I was once a competitive figure skater. Maybe we know someone in common from that circle as well?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #19. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"A competitive figure skater, that's quite impressive Samuel! Among my friends, I don't recall anyone specifically from the skating community. But as you rightly pointed out, it's quite possible that we may share acquaintances from unexpected circles as well. Remarkable, isn't it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sasha Ramirez, your task is to act/speak as Sasha Ramirez would, keeping in mind Sasha Ramirez's social goal.\nYou can find Sasha Ramirez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sasha Ramirez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sasha Ramirez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person has put up their Bell\\'O TV Stand - Black Glass and Wood Trim for sale at $125.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. The item on sale is a beautiful 42\" Bell\\'O TV Stand, featuring black glass with an elegant wood trim. The stand measures 23 inches in height and 21 1/2 inches in depth.\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Amara Hartley\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. Sasha's secrets: She covered up a crime her brother committed.\nAmara Hartley's background: \nSasha Ramirez's goal: You are the buyer for this item and your target price is $112.00. Be aware that you may be penalized if you purchase it for a significantly higher price than the target. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hi there, I'm interested in the Bell'O TV Stand that you have for sale. I've been looking for one to fit in a specific spot in my living room and the dimensions seem perfect. However, would you consider lowering the price to $112?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sasha Ramirez, your task is to act/speak as Sasha Ramirez would, keeping in mind Sasha Ramirez's social goal.\nYou can find Sasha Ramirez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sasha Ramirez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sasha Ramirez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person has put up their Bell\\'O TV Stand - Black Glass and Wood Trim for sale at $125.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. The item on sale is a beautiful 42\" Bell\\'O TV Stand, featuring black glass with an elegant wood trim. The stand measures 23 inches in height and 21 1/2 inches in depth.\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Amara Hartley\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. Sasha's secrets: She covered up a crime her brother committed.\nAmara Hartley's background: \nSasha Ramirez's goal: You are the buyer for this item and your target price is $112.00. Be aware that you may be penalized if you purchase it for a significantly higher price than the target. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hi there, I'm interested in the Bell'O TV Stand that you have for sale. I've been looking for one to fit in a specific spot in my living room and the dimensions seem perfect. However, would you consider lowering the price to $112?\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"Hi Sasha, I'm glad that the TV stand seems perfect for you. I can understand that you're looking for a bit of a price reduction. I can bring it down to $115 if that works for you.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you Amara for considering a price reduction. Since we're so close, could we perhaps meet in the middle at $113.50? With this, the price seems reasonable and I can conveniently pay you in cash if that helps.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sasha Ramirez, your task is to act/speak as Sasha Ramirez would, keeping in mind Sasha Ramirez's social goal.\nYou can find Sasha Ramirez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sasha Ramirez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sasha Ramirez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person has put up their Bell\\'O TV Stand - Black Glass and Wood Trim for sale at $125.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. The item on sale is a beautiful 42\" Bell\\'O TV Stand, featuring black glass with an elegant wood trim. The stand measures 23 inches in height and 21 1/2 inches in depth.\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Amara Hartley\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. Sasha's secrets: She covered up a crime her brother committed.\nAmara Hartley's background: \nSasha Ramirez's goal: You are the buyer for this item and your target price is $112.00. Be aware that you may be penalized if you purchase it for a significantly higher price than the target. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hi there, I'm interested in the Bell'O TV Stand that you have for sale. I've been looking for one to fit in a specific spot in my living room and the dimensions seem perfect. However, would you consider lowering the price to $112?\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"Hi Sasha, I'm glad that the TV stand seems perfect for you. I can understand that you're looking for a bit of a price reduction. I can bring it down to $115 if that works for you.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Thank you Amara for considering a price reduction. Since we're so close, could we perhaps meet in the middle at $113.50? With this, the price seems reasonable and I can conveniently pay you in cash if that helps.\"\n\nTurn #3: Amara Hartley said: \"Sasha, I appreciate your negotiation and your offer to pay in cash. I can agree to the $113.50. I think we have a deal.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Awesome, I think we have a deal then. I can come by and pick it up at a time that's convenient for you. Could you please let me know what works best for you?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sasha Ramirez, your task is to act/speak as Sasha Ramirez would, keeping in mind Sasha Ramirez's social goal.\nYou can find Sasha Ramirez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sasha Ramirez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sasha Ramirez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person has put up their Bell\\'O TV Stand - Black Glass and Wood Trim for sale at $125.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. The item on sale is a beautiful 42\" Bell\\'O TV Stand, featuring black glass with an elegant wood trim. The stand measures 23 inches in height and 21 1/2 inches in depth.\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Amara Hartley\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. Sasha's secrets: She covered up a crime her brother committed.\nAmara Hartley's background: \nSasha Ramirez's goal: You are the buyer for this item and your target price is $112.00. Be aware that you may be penalized if you purchase it for a significantly higher price than the target. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hi there, I'm interested in the Bell'O TV Stand that you have for sale. I've been looking for one to fit in a specific spot in my living room and the dimensions seem perfect. However, would you consider lowering the price to $112?\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"Hi Sasha, I'm glad that the TV stand seems perfect for you. I can understand that you're looking for a bit of a price reduction. I can bring it down to $115 if that works for you.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Thank you Amara for considering a price reduction. Since we're so close, could we perhaps meet in the middle at $113.50? With this, the price seems reasonable and I can conveniently pay you in cash if that helps.\"\n\nTurn #3: Amara Hartley said: \"Sasha, I appreciate your negotiation and your offer to pay in cash. I can agree to the $113.50. I think we have a deal.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Awesome, I think we have a deal then. I can come by and pick it up at a time that's convenient for you. Could you please let me know what works best for you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Amara Hartley said: \"Sasha, it's been a pleasure negotiating with you. How about picking it up this Saturday afternoon? That works best for me. Looking forward to meeting you then.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Perfect! Saturday afternoon works for me as well. Thank you for the smooth negotiation, and I look forward to meeting you then to pick up the TV stand. See you!'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sasha Ramirez, your task is to act/speak as Sasha Ramirez would, keeping in mind Sasha Ramirez's social goal.\nYou can find Sasha Ramirez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sasha Ramirez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sasha Ramirez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person has put up their Bell\\'O TV Stand - Black Glass and Wood Trim for sale at $125.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. The item on sale is a beautiful 42\" Bell\\'O TV Stand, featuring black glass with an elegant wood trim. The stand measures 23 inches in height and 21 1/2 inches in depth.\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Amara Hartley\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. Sasha's secrets: She covered up a crime her brother committed.\nAmara Hartley's background: \nSasha Ramirez's goal: You are the buyer for this item and your target price is $112.00. Be aware that you may be penalized if you purchase it for a significantly higher price than the target. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hi there, I'm interested in the Bell'O TV Stand that you have for sale. I've been looking for one to fit in a specific spot in my living room and the dimensions seem perfect. However, would you consider lowering the price to $112?\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"Hi Sasha, I'm glad that the TV stand seems perfect for you. I can understand that you're looking for a bit of a price reduction. I can bring it down to $115 if that works for you.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Thank you Amara for considering a price reduction. Since we're so close, could we perhaps meet in the middle at $113.50? With this, the price seems reasonable and I can conveniently pay you in cash if that helps.\"\n\nTurn #3: Amara Hartley said: \"Sasha, I appreciate your negotiation and your offer to pay in cash. I can agree to the $113.50. I think we have a deal.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Awesome, I think we have a deal then. I can come by and pick it up at a time that's convenient for you. Could you please let me know what works best for you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Amara Hartley said: \"Sasha, it's been a pleasure negotiating with you. How about picking it up this Saturday afternoon? That works best for me. Looking forward to meeting you then.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Perfect! Saturday afternoon works for me as well. Thank you for the smooth negotiation, and I look forward to meeting you then to pick up the TV stand. See you!\"\n\nTurn #7: Amara Hartley said: \"Great, see you then Sasha! Have a good day.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person has put up their Bell\\'O TV Stand - Black Glass and Wood Trim for sale at $125.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. The item on sale is a beautiful 42\" Bell\\'O TV Stand, featuring black glass with an elegant wood trim. The stand measures 23 inches in height and 21 1/2 inches in depth.\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Amara Hartley\nSasha Ramirez's background: \nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nSasha Ramirez's goal: Unknown\nAmara Hartley's goal: You are the seller for this item, and your target price is $76.9. Please be aware that you may face a penalty if the item is sold for a price significantly lower than the target price. However, a bonus will be rewarded if you manage to sell it for more than the target price.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hi there, I'm interested in the Bell'O TV Stand that you have for sale. I've been looking for one to fit in a specific spot in my living room and the dimensions seem perfect. However, would you consider lowering the price to $112?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hi Sasha, I'm glad that the TV stand seems perfect for you. I can understand that you're looking for a bit of a price reduction. I can bring it down to $115 if that works for you.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person has put up their Bell\\'O TV Stand - Black Glass and Wood Trim for sale at $125.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. The item on sale is a beautiful 42\" Bell\\'O TV Stand, featuring black glass with an elegant wood trim. The stand measures 23 inches in height and 21 1/2 inches in depth.\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Amara Hartley\nSasha Ramirez's background: \nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nSasha Ramirez's goal: Unknown\nAmara Hartley's goal: You are the seller for this item, and your target price is $76.9. Please be aware that you may face a penalty if the item is sold for a price significantly lower than the target price. However, a bonus will be rewarded if you manage to sell it for more than the target price.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hi there, I'm interested in the Bell'O TV Stand that you have for sale. I've been looking for one to fit in a specific spot in my living room and the dimensions seem perfect. However, would you consider lowering the price to $112?\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"Hi Sasha, I'm glad that the TV stand seems perfect for you. I can understand that you're looking for a bit of a price reduction. I can bring it down to $115 if that works for you.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Thank you Amara for considering a price reduction. Since we're so close, could we perhaps meet in the middle at $113.50? With this, the price seems reasonable and I can conveniently pay you in cash if that helps.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Sasha, I appreciate your negotiation and your offer to pay in cash. I can agree to the $113.50. I think we have a deal.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person has put up their Bell\\'O TV Stand - Black Glass and Wood Trim for sale at $125.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. The item on sale is a beautiful 42\" Bell\\'O TV Stand, featuring black glass with an elegant wood trim. The stand measures 23 inches in height and 21 1/2 inches in depth.\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Amara Hartley\nSasha Ramirez's background: \nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nSasha Ramirez's goal: Unknown\nAmara Hartley's goal: You are the seller for this item, and your target price is $76.9. Please be aware that you may face a penalty if the item is sold for a price significantly lower than the target price. However, a bonus will be rewarded if you manage to sell it for more than the target price.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hi there, I'm interested in the Bell'O TV Stand that you have for sale. I've been looking for one to fit in a specific spot in my living room and the dimensions seem perfect. However, would you consider lowering the price to $112?\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"Hi Sasha, I'm glad that the TV stand seems perfect for you. I can understand that you're looking for a bit of a price reduction. I can bring it down to $115 if that works for you.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Thank you Amara for considering a price reduction. Since we're so close, could we perhaps meet in the middle at $113.50? With this, the price seems reasonable and I can conveniently pay you in cash if that helps.\"\n\nTurn #3: Amara Hartley said: \"Sasha, I appreciate your negotiation and your offer to pay in cash. I can agree to the $113.50. I think we have a deal.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Awesome, I think we have a deal then. I can come by and pick it up at a time that's convenient for you. Could you please let me know what works best for you?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sasha, it's been a pleasure negotiating with you. How about picking it up this Saturday afternoon? That works best for me. Looking forward to meeting you then.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person has put up their Bell\\'O TV Stand - Black Glass and Wood Trim for sale at $125.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. The item on sale is a beautiful 42\" Bell\\'O TV Stand, featuring black glass with an elegant wood trim. The stand measures 23 inches in height and 21 1/2 inches in depth.\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Amara Hartley\nSasha Ramirez's background: \nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nSasha Ramirez's goal: Unknown\nAmara Hartley's goal: You are the seller for this item, and your target price is $76.9. Please be aware that you may face a penalty if the item is sold for a price significantly lower than the target price. However, a bonus will be rewarded if you manage to sell it for more than the target price.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hi there, I'm interested in the Bell'O TV Stand that you have for sale. I've been looking for one to fit in a specific spot in my living room and the dimensions seem perfect. However, would you consider lowering the price to $112?\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"Hi Sasha, I'm glad that the TV stand seems perfect for you. I can understand that you're looking for a bit of a price reduction. I can bring it down to $115 if that works for you.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Thank you Amara for considering a price reduction. Since we're so close, could we perhaps meet in the middle at $113.50? With this, the price seems reasonable and I can conveniently pay you in cash if that helps.\"\n\nTurn #3: Amara Hartley said: \"Sasha, I appreciate your negotiation and your offer to pay in cash. I can agree to the $113.50. I think we have a deal.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Awesome, I think we have a deal then. I can come by and pick it up at a time that's convenient for you. Could you please let me know what works best for you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Amara Hartley said: \"Sasha, it's been a pleasure negotiating with you. How about picking it up this Saturday afternoon? That works best for me. Looking forward to meeting you then.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Perfect! Saturday afternoon works for me as well. Thank you for the smooth negotiation, and I look forward to meeting you then to pick up the TV stand. See you!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Great, see you then Sasha! Have a good day.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person has put up their Bell\\'O TV Stand - Black Glass and Wood Trim for sale at $125.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. The item on sale is a beautiful 42\" Bell\\'O TV Stand, featuring black glass with an elegant wood trim. The stand measures 23 inches in height and 21 1/2 inches in depth.\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Amara Hartley\nSasha Ramirez's background: \nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nSasha Ramirez's goal: Unknown\nAmara Hartley's goal: You are the seller for this item, and your target price is $76.9. Please be aware that you may face a penalty if the item is sold for a price significantly lower than the target price. However, a bonus will be rewarded if you manage to sell it for more than the target price.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hi there, I'm interested in the Bell'O TV Stand that you have for sale. I've been looking for one to fit in a specific spot in my living room and the dimensions seem perfect. However, would you consider lowering the price to $112?\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"Hi Sasha, I'm glad that the TV stand seems perfect for you. I can understand that you're looking for a bit of a price reduction. I can bring it down to $115 if that works for you.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Thank you Amara for considering a price reduction. Since we're so close, could we perhaps meet in the middle at $113.50? With this, the price seems reasonable and I can conveniently pay you in cash if that helps.\"\n\nTurn #3: Amara Hartley said: \"Sasha, I appreciate your negotiation and your offer to pay in cash. I can agree to the $113.50. I think we have a deal.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Awesome, I think we have a deal then. I can come by and pick it up at a time that's convenient for you. Could you please let me know what works best for you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Amara Hartley said: \"Sasha, it's been a pleasure negotiating with you. How about picking it up this Saturday afternoon? That works best for me. Looking forward to meeting you then.\"\n\nTurn #6: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Perfect! Saturday afternoon works for me as well. Thank you for the smooth negotiation, and I look forward to meeting you then to pick up the TV stand. See you!\"\n\nTurn #7: Amara Hartley said: \"Great, see you then Sasha! Have a good day.\"\n\nTurn #8: Sasha Ramirez left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Lena Goodwin\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nLena Goodwin's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMable: School: Sewanee, University of the South Company: BellSouth \nLolita: School: Winona State University Company: ONEOK \nCatherine: School: Utah Valley State College Company: Lincoln Industries \nVita: School: Winona State University Company: Erickson Air-Crane \nBrandon: School: Winona State University Company: The Greenbrier Companies \nDon: School: Clark University Company: MetLife \nAlvin: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Vectren \nTara: School: Kansas Wesleyan University Company: Gentiva Health Services \nArlene: School: Kansas Wesleyan University Company: BellSouth \n\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hello, I'm Lily Greenberg. It's great to meet you at this lovely party. Are you enjoying your time here?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Lena Goodwin\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nLena Goodwin's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMable: School: Sewanee, University of the South Company: BellSouth \nLolita: School: Winona State University Company: ONEOK \nCatherine: School: Utah Valley State College Company: Lincoln Industries \nVita: School: Winona State University Company: Erickson Air-Crane \nBrandon: School: Winona State University Company: The Greenbrier Companies \nDon: School: Clark University Company: MetLife \nAlvin: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Vectren \nTara: School: Kansas Wesleyan University Company: Gentiva Health Services \nArlene: School: Kansas Wesleyan University Company: BellSouth \n\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello, I'm Lily Greenberg. It's great to meet you at this lovely party. Are you enjoying your time here?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hello Lily, I'm Lena. Yes, this party is quite delightful indeed. I'm rather new in town and I've been trying to find some familiar faces. I know some people from BellSouth and Coe College. Do you happen to know any of them from there?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Oh, BellSouth? What a coincidence! One of my close friends, Mable, happens to work there. She also attended Sewanee, University of the South. Was your acquaintance there long before you moved here?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Lena Goodwin\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nLena Goodwin's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMable: School: Sewanee, University of the South Company: BellSouth \nLolita: School: Winona State University Company: ONEOK \nCatherine: School: Utah Valley State College Company: Lincoln Industries \nVita: School: Winona State University Company: Erickson Air-Crane \nBrandon: School: Winona State University Company: The Greenbrier Companies \nDon: School: Clark University Company: MetLife \nAlvin: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Vectren \nTara: School: Kansas Wesleyan University Company: Gentiva Health Services \nArlene: School: Kansas Wesleyan University Company: BellSouth \n\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello, I'm Lily Greenberg. It's great to meet you at this lovely party. Are you enjoying your time here?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hello Lily, I'm Lena. Yes, this party is quite delightful indeed. I'm rather new in town and I've been trying to find some familiar faces. I know some people from BellSouth and Coe College. Do you happen to know any of them from there?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Oh, BellSouth? What a coincidence! One of my close friends, Mable, happens to work there. She also attended Sewanee, University of the South. Was your acquaintance there long before you moved here?\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"Interesting! It sounds like we may have a mutual acquaintance then. My friend Dave from BellSouth also attended Sewanee and has been there for quite some time. Does your friend Mable perhaps know a Dave?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's quite a coincidence! Yes, I do believe Mable has mentioned a Dave, though I can't be certain without checking with her again. Our social networks are intertwined in surprising ways, aren't they?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Lena Goodwin\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nLena Goodwin's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMable: School: Sewanee, University of the South Company: BellSouth \nLolita: School: Winona State University Company: ONEOK \nCatherine: School: Utah Valley State College Company: Lincoln Industries \nVita: School: Winona State University Company: Erickson Air-Crane \nBrandon: School: Winona State University Company: The Greenbrier Companies \nDon: School: Clark University Company: MetLife \nAlvin: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Vectren \nTara: School: Kansas Wesleyan University Company: Gentiva Health Services \nArlene: School: Kansas Wesleyan University Company: BellSouth \n\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello, I'm Lily Greenberg. It's great to meet you at this lovely party. Are you enjoying your time here?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hello Lily, I'm Lena. Yes, this party is quite delightful indeed. I'm rather new in town and I've been trying to find some familiar faces. I know some people from BellSouth and Coe College. Do you happen to know any of them from there?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Oh, BellSouth? What a coincidence! One of my close friends, Mable, happens to work there. She also attended Sewanee, University of the South. Was your acquaintance there long before you moved here?\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"Interesting! It sounds like we may have a mutual acquaintance then. My friend Dave from BellSouth also attended Sewanee and has been there for quite some time. Does your friend Mable perhaps know a Dave?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"That's quite a coincidence! Yes, I do believe Mable has mentioned a Dave, though I can't be certain without checking with her again. Our social networks are intertwined in surprising ways, aren't they?\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"Indeed, it's fascinating how small the world can be at times. And out of curiosity, do you know anybody from Coe College or perhaps from a company named The Greenbrier Companies?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Of course, I do happen to know someone from The Greenbrier Companies, a good friend of mine named Brandon. He also attended Winona State University. It's really incredible how our paths are crossing over!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Lena Goodwin\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nLena Goodwin's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMable: School: Sewanee, University of the South Company: BellSouth \nLolita: School: Winona State University Company: ONEOK \nCatherine: School: Utah Valley State College Company: Lincoln Industries \nVita: School: Winona State University Company: Erickson Air-Crane \nBrandon: School: Winona State University Company: The Greenbrier Companies \nDon: School: Clark University Company: MetLife \nAlvin: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Vectren \nTara: School: Kansas Wesleyan University Company: Gentiva Health Services \nArlene: School: Kansas Wesleyan University Company: BellSouth \n\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello, I'm Lily Greenberg. It's great to meet you at this lovely party. Are you enjoying your time here?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hello Lily, I'm Lena. Yes, this party is quite delightful indeed. I'm rather new in town and I've been trying to find some familiar faces. I know some people from BellSouth and Coe College. Do you happen to know any of them from there?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Oh, BellSouth? What a coincidence! One of my close friends, Mable, happens to work there. She also attended Sewanee, University of the South. Was your acquaintance there long before you moved here?\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"Interesting! It sounds like we may have a mutual acquaintance then. My friend Dave from BellSouth also attended Sewanee and has been there for quite some time. Does your friend Mable perhaps know a Dave?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"That's quite a coincidence! Yes, I do believe Mable has mentioned a Dave, though I can't be certain without checking with her again. Our social networks are intertwined in surprising ways, aren't they?\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"Indeed, it's fascinating how small the world can be at times. And out of curiosity, do you know anybody from Coe College or perhaps from a company named The Greenbrier Companies?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Of course, I do happen to know someone from The Greenbrier Companies, a good friend of mine named Brandon. He also attended Winona State University. It's really incredible how our paths are crossing over!\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"That's indeed incredible! My friend Monica works at The Greenbrier Companies, and she also studied at Coe College. Does Brandon happen to know Monica, by any chance?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"It seems you have a knack for finding connections! As for your question, I can't recall offhand whether Brandon knows a Monica but I wouldn't be surprised if he does. It really feels like we run in the same circles, don't we?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Lena Goodwin\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nLena Goodwin's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMable: School: Sewanee, University of the South Company: BellSouth \nLolita: School: Winona State University Company: ONEOK \nCatherine: School: Utah Valley State College Company: Lincoln Industries \nVita: School: Winona State University Company: Erickson Air-Crane \nBrandon: School: Winona State University Company: The Greenbrier Companies \nDon: School: Clark University Company: MetLife \nAlvin: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Vectren \nTara: School: Kansas Wesleyan University Company: Gentiva Health Services \nArlene: School: Kansas Wesleyan University Company: BellSouth \n\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello, I'm Lily Greenberg. It's great to meet you at this lovely party. Are you enjoying your time here?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hello Lily, I'm Lena. Yes, this party is quite delightful indeed. I'm rather new in town and I've been trying to find some familiar faces. I know some people from BellSouth and Coe College. Do you happen to know any of them from there?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Oh, BellSouth? What a coincidence! One of my close friends, Mable, happens to work there. She also attended Sewanee, University of the South. Was your acquaintance there long before you moved here?\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"Interesting! It sounds like we may have a mutual acquaintance then. My friend Dave from BellSouth also attended Sewanee and has been there for quite some time. Does your friend Mable perhaps know a Dave?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"That's quite a coincidence! Yes, I do believe Mable has mentioned a Dave, though I can't be certain without checking with her again. Our social networks are intertwined in surprising ways, aren't they?\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"Indeed, it's fascinating how small the world can be at times. And out of curiosity, do you know anybody from Coe College or perhaps from a company named The Greenbrier Companies?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Of course, I do happen to know someone from The Greenbrier Companies, a good friend of mine named Brandon. He also attended Winona State University. It's really incredible how our paths are crossing over!\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"That's indeed incredible! My friend Monica works at The Greenbrier Companies, and she also studied at Coe College. Does Brandon happen to know Monica, by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"It seems you have a knack for finding connections! As for your question, I can't recall offhand whether Brandon knows a Monica but I wouldn't be surprised if he does. It really feels like we run in the same circles, don't we?\"\n\nTurn #9: Lena Goodwin said: \"Absolutely, it's quite amusing actually. I will check with Dave and Monica. Who knows, we might have a gathering one day with all connected parties from these intertwining circles. It was lovely meeting you, Lily. Enjoy the rest of the party!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Likewise Lena, it has been a pleasant conversation. I also look forward to possibly meeting at a gathering in the future. We do move in similar circles after all. Enjoy your evening!'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Lena Goodwin\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nLena Goodwin's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMable: School: Sewanee, University of the South Company: BellSouth \nLolita: School: Winona State University Company: ONEOK \nCatherine: School: Utah Valley State College Company: Lincoln Industries \nVita: School: Winona State University Company: Erickson Air-Crane \nBrandon: School: Winona State University Company: The Greenbrier Companies \nDon: School: Clark University Company: MetLife \nAlvin: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Vectren \nTara: School: Kansas Wesleyan University Company: Gentiva Health Services \nArlene: School: Kansas Wesleyan University Company: BellSouth \n\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello, I'm Lily Greenberg. It's great to meet you at this lovely party. Are you enjoying your time here?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hello Lily, I'm Lena. Yes, this party is quite delightful indeed. I'm rather new in town and I've been trying to find some familiar faces. I know some people from BellSouth and Coe College. Do you happen to know any of them from there?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Oh, BellSouth? What a coincidence! One of my close friends, Mable, happens to work there. She also attended Sewanee, University of the South. Was your acquaintance there long before you moved here?\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"Interesting! It sounds like we may have a mutual acquaintance then. My friend Dave from BellSouth also attended Sewanee and has been there for quite some time. Does your friend Mable perhaps know a Dave?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"That's quite a coincidence! Yes, I do believe Mable has mentioned a Dave, though I can't be certain without checking with her again. Our social networks are intertwined in surprising ways, aren't they?\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"Indeed, it's fascinating how small the world can be at times. And out of curiosity, do you know anybody from Coe College or perhaps from a company named The Greenbrier Companies?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Of course, I do happen to know someone from The Greenbrier Companies, a good friend of mine named Brandon. He also attended Winona State University. It's really incredible how our paths are crossing over!\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"That's indeed incredible! My friend Monica works at The Greenbrier Companies, and she also studied at Coe College. Does Brandon happen to know Monica, by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"It seems you have a knack for finding connections! As for your question, I can't recall offhand whether Brandon knows a Monica but I wouldn't be surprised if he does. It really feels like we run in the same circles, don't we?\"\n\nTurn #9: Lena Goodwin said: \"Absolutely, it's quite amusing actually. I will check with Dave and Monica. Who knows, we might have a gathering one day with all connected parties from these intertwining circles. It was lovely meeting you, Lily. Enjoy the rest of the party!\"\n\nTurn #10: Lily Greenberg said: \"Likewise Lena, it has been a pleasant conversation. I also look forward to possibly meeting at a gathering in the future. We do move in similar circles after all. Enjoy your evening!\"\n\nTurn #11: Lena Goodwin left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Lena Goodwin\nLily Greenberg's background: \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDave: School: Sewanee, University of the South Company: BellSouth \nTimothy: School: Louisiana State University Company: BellSouth \nLeona: School: Coe College Company: Franklin Templeton \nAlvin: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Vectren \nKarissa: School: Saint John's University Company: U.S. Venture Partners \nStephanie: School: Coe College Company: Sequoia Capital \nKathy: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Estes Industries \nMonica: School: Coe College Company: The Greenbrier Companies \nBlanche: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Oakley, Inc.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello, I'm Lily Greenberg. It's great to meet you at this lovely party. Are you enjoying your time here?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hello Lily, I'm Lena. Yes, this party is quite delightful indeed. I'm rather new in town and I've been trying to find some familiar faces. I know some people from BellSouth and Coe College. Do you happen to know any of them from there?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Lena Goodwin\nLily Greenberg's background: \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDave: School: Sewanee, University of the South Company: BellSouth \nTimothy: School: Louisiana State University Company: BellSouth \nLeona: School: Coe College Company: Franklin Templeton \nAlvin: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Vectren \nKarissa: School: Saint John's University Company: U.S. Venture Partners \nStephanie: School: Coe College Company: Sequoia Capital \nKathy: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Estes Industries \nMonica: School: Coe College Company: The Greenbrier Companies \nBlanche: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Oakley, Inc.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello, I'm Lily Greenberg. It's great to meet you at this lovely party. Are you enjoying your time here?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hello Lily, I'm Lena. Yes, this party is quite delightful indeed. I'm rather new in town and I've been trying to find some familiar faces. I know some people from BellSouth and Coe College. Do you happen to know any of them from there?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Oh, BellSouth? What a coincidence! One of my close friends, Mable, happens to work there. She also attended Sewanee, University of the South. Was your acquaintance there long before you moved here?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Interesting! It sounds like we may have a mutual acquaintance then. My friend Dave from BellSouth also attended Sewanee and has been there for quite some time. Does your friend Mable perhaps know a Dave?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Lena Goodwin\nLily Greenberg's background: \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDave: School: Sewanee, University of the South Company: BellSouth \nTimothy: School: Louisiana State University Company: BellSouth \nLeona: School: Coe College Company: Franklin Templeton \nAlvin: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Vectren \nKarissa: School: Saint John's University Company: U.S. Venture Partners \nStephanie: School: Coe College Company: Sequoia Capital \nKathy: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Estes Industries \nMonica: School: Coe College Company: The Greenbrier Companies \nBlanche: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Oakley, Inc.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello, I'm Lily Greenberg. It's great to meet you at this lovely party. Are you enjoying your time here?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hello Lily, I'm Lena. Yes, this party is quite delightful indeed. I'm rather new in town and I've been trying to find some familiar faces. I know some people from BellSouth and Coe College. Do you happen to know any of them from there?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Oh, BellSouth? What a coincidence! One of my close friends, Mable, happens to work there. She also attended Sewanee, University of the South. Was your acquaintance there long before you moved here?\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"Interesting! It sounds like we may have a mutual acquaintance then. My friend Dave from BellSouth also attended Sewanee and has been there for quite some time. Does your friend Mable perhaps know a Dave?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"That's quite a coincidence! Yes, I do believe Mable has mentioned a Dave, though I can't be certain without checking with her again. Our social networks are intertwined in surprising ways, aren't they?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, it's fascinating how small the world can be at times. And out of curiosity, do you know anybody from Coe College or perhaps from a company named The Greenbrier Companies?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Lena Goodwin\nLily Greenberg's background: \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDave: School: Sewanee, University of the South Company: BellSouth \nTimothy: School: Louisiana State University Company: BellSouth \nLeona: School: Coe College Company: Franklin Templeton \nAlvin: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Vectren \nKarissa: School: Saint John's University Company: U.S. Venture Partners \nStephanie: School: Coe College Company: Sequoia Capital \nKathy: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Estes Industries \nMonica: School: Coe College Company: The Greenbrier Companies \nBlanche: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Oakley, Inc.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello, I'm Lily Greenberg. It's great to meet you at this lovely party. Are you enjoying your time here?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hello Lily, I'm Lena. Yes, this party is quite delightful indeed. I'm rather new in town and I've been trying to find some familiar faces. I know some people from BellSouth and Coe College. Do you happen to know any of them from there?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Oh, BellSouth? What a coincidence! One of my close friends, Mable, happens to work there. She also attended Sewanee, University of the South. Was your acquaintance there long before you moved here?\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"Interesting! It sounds like we may have a mutual acquaintance then. My friend Dave from BellSouth also attended Sewanee and has been there for quite some time. Does your friend Mable perhaps know a Dave?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"That's quite a coincidence! Yes, I do believe Mable has mentioned a Dave, though I can't be certain without checking with her again. Our social networks are intertwined in surprising ways, aren't they?\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"Indeed, it's fascinating how small the world can be at times. And out of curiosity, do you know anybody from Coe College or perhaps from a company named The Greenbrier Companies?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Of course, I do happen to know someone from The Greenbrier Companies, a good friend of mine named Brandon. He also attended Winona State University. It's really incredible how our paths are crossing over!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's indeed incredible! My friend Monica works at The Greenbrier Companies, and she also studied at Coe College. Does Brandon happen to know Monica, by any chance?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Lena Goodwin\nLily Greenberg's background: \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDave: School: Sewanee, University of the South Company: BellSouth \nTimothy: School: Louisiana State University Company: BellSouth \nLeona: School: Coe College Company: Franklin Templeton \nAlvin: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Vectren \nKarissa: School: Saint John's University Company: U.S. Venture Partners \nStephanie: School: Coe College Company: Sequoia Capital \nKathy: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Estes Industries \nMonica: School: Coe College Company: The Greenbrier Companies \nBlanche: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Oakley, Inc.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello, I'm Lily Greenberg. It's great to meet you at this lovely party. Are you enjoying your time here?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hello Lily, I'm Lena. Yes, this party is quite delightful indeed. I'm rather new in town and I've been trying to find some familiar faces. I know some people from BellSouth and Coe College. Do you happen to know any of them from there?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Oh, BellSouth? What a coincidence! One of my close friends, Mable, happens to work there. She also attended Sewanee, University of the South. Was your acquaintance there long before you moved here?\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"Interesting! It sounds like we may have a mutual acquaintance then. My friend Dave from BellSouth also attended Sewanee and has been there for quite some time. Does your friend Mable perhaps know a Dave?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"That's quite a coincidence! Yes, I do believe Mable has mentioned a Dave, though I can't be certain without checking with her again. Our social networks are intertwined in surprising ways, aren't they?\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"Indeed, it's fascinating how small the world can be at times. And out of curiosity, do you know anybody from Coe College or perhaps from a company named The Greenbrier Companies?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Of course, I do happen to know someone from The Greenbrier Companies, a good friend of mine named Brandon. He also attended Winona State University. It's really incredible how our paths are crossing over!\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"That's indeed incredible! My friend Monica works at The Greenbrier Companies, and she also studied at Coe College. Does Brandon happen to know Monica, by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"It seems you have a knack for finding connections! As for your question, I can't recall offhand whether Brandon knows a Monica but I wouldn't be surprised if he does. It really feels like we run in the same circles, don't we?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, it's quite amusing actually. I will check with Dave and Monica. Who knows, we might have a gathering one day with all connected parties from these intertwining circles. It was lovely meeting you, Lily. Enjoy the rest of the party!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Lena Goodwin\nLily Greenberg's background: \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDave: School: Sewanee, University of the South Company: BellSouth \nTimothy: School: Louisiana State University Company: BellSouth \nLeona: School: Coe College Company: Franklin Templeton \nAlvin: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Vectren \nKarissa: School: Saint John's University Company: U.S. Venture Partners \nStephanie: School: Coe College Company: Sequoia Capital \nKathy: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Estes Industries \nMonica: School: Coe College Company: The Greenbrier Companies \nBlanche: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Oakley, Inc.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello, I'm Lily Greenberg. It's great to meet you at this lovely party. Are you enjoying your time here?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hello Lily, I'm Lena. Yes, this party is quite delightful indeed. I'm rather new in town and I've been trying to find some familiar faces. I know some people from BellSouth and Coe College. Do you happen to know any of them from there?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Oh, BellSouth? What a coincidence! One of my close friends, Mable, happens to work there. She also attended Sewanee, University of the South. Was your acquaintance there long before you moved here?\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"Interesting! It sounds like we may have a mutual acquaintance then. My friend Dave from BellSouth also attended Sewanee and has been there for quite some time. Does your friend Mable perhaps know a Dave?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"That's quite a coincidence! Yes, I do believe Mable has mentioned a Dave, though I can't be certain without checking with her again. Our social networks are intertwined in surprising ways, aren't they?\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"Indeed, it's fascinating how small the world can be at times. And out of curiosity, do you know anybody from Coe College or perhaps from a company named The Greenbrier Companies?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Of course, I do happen to know someone from The Greenbrier Companies, a good friend of mine named Brandon. He also attended Winona State University. It's really incredible how our paths are crossing over!\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"That's indeed incredible! My friend Monica works at The Greenbrier Companies, and she also studied at Coe College. Does Brandon happen to know Monica, by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"It seems you have a knack for finding connections! As for your question, I can't recall offhand whether Brandon knows a Monica but I wouldn't be surprised if he does. It really feels like we run in the same circles, don't we?\"\n\nTurn #9: Lena Goodwin said: \"Absolutely, it's quite amusing actually. I will check with Dave and Monica. Who knows, we might have a gathering one day with all connected parties from these intertwining circles. It was lovely meeting you, Lily. Enjoy the rest of the party!\"\n\nTurn #10: Lily Greenberg said: \"Likewise Lena, it has been a pleasant conversation. I also look forward to possibly meeting at a gathering in the future. We do move in similar circles after all. Enjoy your evening!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Italian Leather Loveseat for $50.0, while another person is showing interest to purchase it. The item is a full-sized loveseat, crafted from Italian leather in a faded burgandy color. It still has the original tags, and the current owner is the first and only owner. The loveseat is in good condition with no rips or tears, and all cushions are well preserved. The leather presents a charming faded look with various small scratches from the owner's cat, adding a touch of ruggedness perfect for a Man Cave. The transaction is strictly cash and carry as the owner does not offer delivery services.\nParticipants: Micah Stevens and Jaxon Prentice\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nJaxon Prentice's background: \nMicah Stevens's goal: You are the designated buyer for this item and your target price is set at $46.0. If you purchase this item at a significantly higher price than the target, you would face a penalty. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nJaxon Prentice's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Jaxon! I heard you've got a pretty neat Italian leather loveseat for sale. I'm definitely interested and like the rustic look. Just wanted to check though, you've mentioned cash and carry, right?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Italian Leather Loveseat for $50.0, while another person is showing interest to purchase it. The item is a full-sized loveseat, crafted from Italian leather in a faded burgandy color. It still has the original tags, and the current owner is the first and only owner. The loveseat is in good condition with no rips or tears, and all cushions are well preserved. The leather presents a charming faded look with various small scratches from the owner's cat, adding a touch of ruggedness perfect for a Man Cave. The transaction is strictly cash and carry as the owner does not offer delivery services.\nParticipants: Micah Stevens and Jaxon Prentice\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nJaxon Prentice's background: \nMicah Stevens's goal: You are the designated buyer for this item and your target price is set at $46.0. If you purchase this item at a significantly higher price than the target, you would face a penalty. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nJaxon Prentice's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Micah Stevens said: \"Hey Jaxon! I heard you've got a pretty neat Italian leather loveseat for sale. I'm definitely interested and like the rustic look. Just wanted to check though, you've mentioned cash and carry, right?\"\n\nTurn #1: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Hey Micah, great of you to stop by! Yes, indeed it's an authentic Italian leather loveseat with a touch of ruggedness to it. Pardon for any confusion, you're correct, it's cash and carry. So, plan accordingly. Just to set fair expectations, the starting bid is at $80. This is below the market price for such a vintage loveseat, if I may add.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's an interesting starting bid, Jaxon. I've seen similar items floating around for a bit less, though. How about $46? It still seems fair, and considering the cat scratches, it would justify the slight wear and tear on it.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Italian Leather Loveseat for $50.0, while another person is showing interest to purchase it. The item is a full-sized loveseat, crafted from Italian leather in a faded burgandy color. It still has the original tags, and the current owner is the first and only owner. The loveseat is in good condition with no rips or tears, and all cushions are well preserved. The leather presents a charming faded look with various small scratches from the owner's cat, adding a touch of ruggedness perfect for a Man Cave. The transaction is strictly cash and carry as the owner does not offer delivery services.\nParticipants: Micah Stevens and Jaxon Prentice\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nJaxon Prentice's background: \nMicah Stevens's goal: You are the designated buyer for this item and your target price is set at $46.0. If you purchase this item at a significantly higher price than the target, you would face a penalty. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nJaxon Prentice's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Micah Stevens said: \"Hey Jaxon! I heard you've got a pretty neat Italian leather loveseat for sale. I'm definitely interested and like the rustic look. Just wanted to check though, you've mentioned cash and carry, right?\"\n\nTurn #1: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Hey Micah, great of you to stop by! Yes, indeed it's an authentic Italian leather loveseat with a touch of ruggedness to it. Pardon for any confusion, you're correct, it's cash and carry. So, plan accordingly. Just to set fair expectations, the starting bid is at $80. This is below the market price for such a vintage loveseat, if I may add.\"\n\nTurn #2: Micah Stevens said: \"That's an interesting starting bid, Jaxon. I've seen similar items floating around for a bit less, though. How about $46? It still seems fair, and considering the cat scratches, it would justify the slight wear and tear on it.\"\n\nTurn #3: Jaxon Prentice said: \"I hear you Micah, you have a good eye for quality. I think we can split the difference, though. What about $63? That's a fair reflection of its history and pedigree, taking into account the slight wear and tear.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I understand where you're coming from, Jaxon. Considering that the loveseat has a unique vintage vibe, I propose $50. I think that's a fair price considering it's cash and carry and still taking into account those minor scratches you mentioned earlier. So, what do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Italian Leather Loveseat for $50.0, while another person is showing interest to purchase it. The item is a full-sized loveseat, crafted from Italian leather in a faded burgandy color. It still has the original tags, and the current owner is the first and only owner. The loveseat is in good condition with no rips or tears, and all cushions are well preserved. The leather presents a charming faded look with various small scratches from the owner's cat, adding a touch of ruggedness perfect for a Man Cave. The transaction is strictly cash and carry as the owner does not offer delivery services.\nParticipants: Micah Stevens and Jaxon Prentice\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nJaxon Prentice's background: \nMicah Stevens's goal: You are the designated buyer for this item and your target price is set at $46.0. If you purchase this item at a significantly higher price than the target, you would face a penalty. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nJaxon Prentice's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Micah Stevens said: \"Hey Jaxon! I heard you've got a pretty neat Italian leather loveseat for sale. I'm definitely interested and like the rustic look. Just wanted to check though, you've mentioned cash and carry, right?\"\n\nTurn #1: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Hey Micah, great of you to stop by! Yes, indeed it's an authentic Italian leather loveseat with a touch of ruggedness to it. Pardon for any confusion, you're correct, it's cash and carry. So, plan accordingly. Just to set fair expectations, the starting bid is at $80. This is below the market price for such a vintage loveseat, if I may add.\"\n\nTurn #2: Micah Stevens said: \"That's an interesting starting bid, Jaxon. I've seen similar items floating around for a bit less, though. How about $46? It still seems fair, and considering the cat scratches, it would justify the slight wear and tear on it.\"\n\nTurn #3: Jaxon Prentice said: \"I hear you Micah, you have a good eye for quality. I think we can split the difference, though. What about $63? That's a fair reflection of its history and pedigree, taking into account the slight wear and tear.\"\n\nTurn #4: Micah Stevens said: \"I understand where you're coming from, Jaxon. Considering that the loveseat has a unique vintage vibe, I propose $50. I think that's a fair price considering it's cash and carry and still taking into account those minor scratches you mentioned earlier. So, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Micah, your offer is appealing and I see your reasoning. However, considering the condition of the loveseat, the uniqueness, and that cash and carry factor, how about we settle at $55? That's just $5 more, and it secures this vintage and character-filled piece just for you. What do you say?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Alright, Jaxon, you drive a hard bargain. I respect that. Let\u2019s shake on $52 and call it a deal. I think that's a fair middle ground, wouldn't you say?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Italian Leather Loveseat for $50.0, while another person is showing interest to purchase it. The item is a full-sized loveseat, crafted from Italian leather in a faded burgandy color. It still has the original tags, and the current owner is the first and only owner. The loveseat is in good condition with no rips or tears, and all cushions are well preserved. The leather presents a charming faded look with various small scratches from the owner's cat, adding a touch of ruggedness perfect for a Man Cave. The transaction is strictly cash and carry as the owner does not offer delivery services.\nParticipants: Micah Stevens and Jaxon Prentice\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nJaxon Prentice's background: \nMicah Stevens's goal: You are the designated buyer for this item and your target price is set at $46.0. If you purchase this item at a significantly higher price than the target, you would face a penalty. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nJaxon Prentice's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Micah Stevens said: \"Hey Jaxon! I heard you've got a pretty neat Italian leather loveseat for sale. I'm definitely interested and like the rustic look. Just wanted to check though, you've mentioned cash and carry, right?\"\n\nTurn #1: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Hey Micah, great of you to stop by! Yes, indeed it's an authentic Italian leather loveseat with a touch of ruggedness to it. Pardon for any confusion, you're correct, it's cash and carry. So, plan accordingly. Just to set fair expectations, the starting bid is at $80. This is below the market price for such a vintage loveseat, if I may add.\"\n\nTurn #2: Micah Stevens said: \"That's an interesting starting bid, Jaxon. I've seen similar items floating around for a bit less, though. How about $46? It still seems fair, and considering the cat scratches, it would justify the slight wear and tear on it.\"\n\nTurn #3: Jaxon Prentice said: \"I hear you Micah, you have a good eye for quality. I think we can split the difference, though. What about $63? That's a fair reflection of its history and pedigree, taking into account the slight wear and tear.\"\n\nTurn #4: Micah Stevens said: \"I understand where you're coming from, Jaxon. Considering that the loveseat has a unique vintage vibe, I propose $50. I think that's a fair price considering it's cash and carry and still taking into account those minor scratches you mentioned earlier. So, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Micah, your offer is appealing and I see your reasoning. However, considering the condition of the loveseat, the uniqueness, and that cash and carry factor, how about we settle at $55? That's just $5 more, and it secures this vintage and character-filled piece just for you. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #6: Micah Stevens said: \"Alright, Jaxon, you drive a hard bargain. I respect that. Let\u2019s shake on $52 and call it a deal. I think that's a fair middle ground, wouldn't you say?\"\n\nTurn #7: Jaxon Prentice said: \"You've got a deal, Micah. All yours for $52. I'm happy it's going to someone who truly appreciates its vintage and unique value. Looking forward to our transaction! When should I expect you?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Great, Jaxon! I appreciate you meeting me halfway. I'll swing by tomorrow afternoon around 3:00 pm with $52 ready. Looking forward to adding a touch of vintage to my place! Speak to you then.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Italian Leather Loveseat for $50.0, while another person is showing interest to purchase it. The item is a full-sized loveseat, crafted from Italian leather in a faded burgandy color. It still has the original tags, and the current owner is the first and only owner. The loveseat is in good condition with no rips or tears, and all cushions are well preserved. The leather presents a charming faded look with various small scratches from the owner's cat, adding a touch of ruggedness perfect for a Man Cave. The transaction is strictly cash and carry as the owner does not offer delivery services.\nParticipants: Micah Stevens and Jaxon Prentice\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nJaxon Prentice's background: \nMicah Stevens's goal: You are the designated buyer for this item and your target price is set at $46.0. If you purchase this item at a significantly higher price than the target, you would face a penalty. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nJaxon Prentice's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Micah Stevens said: \"Hey Jaxon! I heard you've got a pretty neat Italian leather loveseat for sale. I'm definitely interested and like the rustic look. Just wanted to check though, you've mentioned cash and carry, right?\"\n\nTurn #1: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Hey Micah, great of you to stop by! Yes, indeed it's an authentic Italian leather loveseat with a touch of ruggedness to it. Pardon for any confusion, you're correct, it's cash and carry. So, plan accordingly. Just to set fair expectations, the starting bid is at $80. This is below the market price for such a vintage loveseat, if I may add.\"\n\nTurn #2: Micah Stevens said: \"That's an interesting starting bid, Jaxon. I've seen similar items floating around for a bit less, though. How about $46? It still seems fair, and considering the cat scratches, it would justify the slight wear and tear on it.\"\n\nTurn #3: Jaxon Prentice said: \"I hear you Micah, you have a good eye for quality. I think we can split the difference, though. What about $63? That's a fair reflection of its history and pedigree, taking into account the slight wear and tear.\"\n\nTurn #4: Micah Stevens said: \"I understand where you're coming from, Jaxon. Considering that the loveseat has a unique vintage vibe, I propose $50. I think that's a fair price considering it's cash and carry and still taking into account those minor scratches you mentioned earlier. So, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Micah, your offer is appealing and I see your reasoning. However, considering the condition of the loveseat, the uniqueness, and that cash and carry factor, how about we settle at $55? That's just $5 more, and it secures this vintage and character-filled piece just for you. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #6: Micah Stevens said: \"Alright, Jaxon, you drive a hard bargain. I respect that. Let\u2019s shake on $52 and call it a deal. I think that's a fair middle ground, wouldn't you say?\"\n\nTurn #7: Jaxon Prentice said: \"You've got a deal, Micah. All yours for $52. I'm happy it's going to someone who truly appreciates its vintage and unique value. Looking forward to our transaction! When should I expect you?\"\n\nTurn #8: Micah Stevens said: \"Great, Jaxon! I appreciate you meeting me halfway. I'll swing by tomorrow afternoon around 3:00 pm with $52 ready. Looking forward to adding a touch of vintage to my place! Speak to you then.\"\n\nTurn #9: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Perfect, Micah! 3:00 pm it is. I'm sure you're going to love how it complements your place. Looking forward to seeing you tomorrow. Take care!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Jaxon Prentice, your task is to act/speak as Jaxon Prentice would, keeping in mind Jaxon Prentice's social goal.\nYou can find Jaxon Prentice's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Jaxon Prentice's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Jaxon Prentice's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Italian Leather Loveseat for $50.0, while another person is showing interest to purchase it. The item is a full-sized loveseat, crafted from Italian leather in a faded burgandy color. It still has the original tags, and the current owner is the first and only owner. The loveseat is in good condition with no rips or tears, and all cushions are well preserved. The leather presents a charming faded look with various small scratches from the owner's cat, adding a touch of ruggedness perfect for a Man Cave. The transaction is strictly cash and carry as the owner does not offer delivery services.\nParticipants: Micah Stevens and Jaxon Prentice\nMicah Stevens's background: \nJaxon Prentice's background: Jaxon Prentice is a 40-year-old male investigative journalist. He/him pronouns. Jaxon Prentice, an investigative journalist, is known for his brisk jogging sessions early in the morning and his active participation in community functions. Personality and values description: Jaxon Prentice, outgoing yet erratic, emphasizes achievement, power, and security. His decisions swing between quick adaptations to situations and careful planning. Jaxon's secrets: Fabricated evidence to incriminate a corrupt politician\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nJaxon Prentice's goal: You are the seller for this item, with a target price of $26.5. You'll face a penalty if the item is sold significantly below this price. However, if you manage to sell it for more than the target price, a bonus will be your reward.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Micah Stevens said: \"Hey Jaxon! I heard you've got a pretty neat Italian leather loveseat for sale. I'm definitely interested and like the rustic look. Just wanted to check though, you've mentioned cash and carry, right?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Micah, great of you to stop by! Yes, indeed it's an authentic Italian leather loveseat with a touch of ruggedness to it. Pardon for any confusion, you're correct, it's cash and carry. So, plan accordingly. Just to set fair expectations, the starting bid is at $80. This is below the market price for such a vintage loveseat, if I may add.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Jaxon Prentice, your task is to act/speak as Jaxon Prentice would, keeping in mind Jaxon Prentice's social goal.\nYou can find Jaxon Prentice's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Jaxon Prentice's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Jaxon Prentice's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Italian Leather Loveseat for $50.0, while another person is showing interest to purchase it. The item is a full-sized loveseat, crafted from Italian leather in a faded burgandy color. It still has the original tags, and the current owner is the first and only owner. The loveseat is in good condition with no rips or tears, and all cushions are well preserved. The leather presents a charming faded look with various small scratches from the owner's cat, adding a touch of ruggedness perfect for a Man Cave. The transaction is strictly cash and carry as the owner does not offer delivery services.\nParticipants: Micah Stevens and Jaxon Prentice\nMicah Stevens's background: \nJaxon Prentice's background: Jaxon Prentice is a 40-year-old male investigative journalist. He/him pronouns. Jaxon Prentice, an investigative journalist, is known for his brisk jogging sessions early in the morning and his active participation in community functions. Personality and values description: Jaxon Prentice, outgoing yet erratic, emphasizes achievement, power, and security. His decisions swing between quick adaptations to situations and careful planning. Jaxon's secrets: Fabricated evidence to incriminate a corrupt politician\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nJaxon Prentice's goal: You are the seller for this item, with a target price of $26.5. You'll face a penalty if the item is sold significantly below this price. However, if you manage to sell it for more than the target price, a bonus will be your reward.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Micah Stevens said: \"Hey Jaxon! I heard you've got a pretty neat Italian leather loveseat for sale. I'm definitely interested and like the rustic look. Just wanted to check though, you've mentioned cash and carry, right?\"\n\nTurn #1: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Hey Micah, great of you to stop by! Yes, indeed it's an authentic Italian leather loveseat with a touch of ruggedness to it. Pardon for any confusion, you're correct, it's cash and carry. So, plan accordingly. Just to set fair expectations, the starting bid is at $80. This is below the market price for such a vintage loveseat, if I may add.\"\n\nTurn #2: Micah Stevens said: \"That's an interesting starting bid, Jaxon. I've seen similar items floating around for a bit less, though. How about $46? It still seems fair, and considering the cat scratches, it would justify the slight wear and tear on it.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I hear you Micah, you have a good eye for quality. I think we can split the difference, though. What about $63? That's a fair reflection of its history and pedigree, taking into account the slight wear and tear.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Jaxon Prentice, your task is to act/speak as Jaxon Prentice would, keeping in mind Jaxon Prentice's social goal.\nYou can find Jaxon Prentice's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Jaxon Prentice's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Jaxon Prentice's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Italian Leather Loveseat for $50.0, while another person is showing interest to purchase it. The item is a full-sized loveseat, crafted from Italian leather in a faded burgandy color. It still has the original tags, and the current owner is the first and only owner. The loveseat is in good condition with no rips or tears, and all cushions are well preserved. The leather presents a charming faded look with various small scratches from the owner's cat, adding a touch of ruggedness perfect for a Man Cave. The transaction is strictly cash and carry as the owner does not offer delivery services.\nParticipants: Micah Stevens and Jaxon Prentice\nMicah Stevens's background: \nJaxon Prentice's background: Jaxon Prentice is a 40-year-old male investigative journalist. He/him pronouns. Jaxon Prentice, an investigative journalist, is known for his brisk jogging sessions early in the morning and his active participation in community functions. Personality and values description: Jaxon Prentice, outgoing yet erratic, emphasizes achievement, power, and security. His decisions swing between quick adaptations to situations and careful planning. Jaxon's secrets: Fabricated evidence to incriminate a corrupt politician\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nJaxon Prentice's goal: You are the seller for this item, with a target price of $26.5. You'll face a penalty if the item is sold significantly below this price. However, if you manage to sell it for more than the target price, a bonus will be your reward.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Micah Stevens said: \"Hey Jaxon! I heard you've got a pretty neat Italian leather loveseat for sale. I'm definitely interested and like the rustic look. Just wanted to check though, you've mentioned cash and carry, right?\"\n\nTurn #1: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Hey Micah, great of you to stop by! Yes, indeed it's an authentic Italian leather loveseat with a touch of ruggedness to it. Pardon for any confusion, you're correct, it's cash and carry. So, plan accordingly. Just to set fair expectations, the starting bid is at $80. This is below the market price for such a vintage loveseat, if I may add.\"\n\nTurn #2: Micah Stevens said: \"That's an interesting starting bid, Jaxon. I've seen similar items floating around for a bit less, though. How about $46? It still seems fair, and considering the cat scratches, it would justify the slight wear and tear on it.\"\n\nTurn #3: Jaxon Prentice said: \"I hear you Micah, you have a good eye for quality. I think we can split the difference, though. What about $63? That's a fair reflection of its history and pedigree, taking into account the slight wear and tear.\"\n\nTurn #4: Micah Stevens said: \"I understand where you're coming from, Jaxon. Considering that the loveseat has a unique vintage vibe, I propose $50. I think that's a fair price considering it's cash and carry and still taking into account those minor scratches you mentioned earlier. So, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Micah, your offer is appealing and I see your reasoning. However, considering the condition of the loveseat, the uniqueness, and that cash and carry factor, how about we settle at $55? That's just $5 more, and it secures this vintage and character-filled piece just for you. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #6: Micah Stevens said: \"Alright, Jaxon, you drive a hard bargain. I respect that. Let\u2019s shake on $52 and call it a deal. I think that's a fair middle ground, wouldn't you say?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You've got a deal, Micah. All yours for $52. I'm happy it's going to someone who truly appreciates its vintage and unique value. Looking forward to our transaction! When should I expect you?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Jaxon Prentice, your task is to act/speak as Jaxon Prentice would, keeping in mind Jaxon Prentice's social goal.\nYou can find Jaxon Prentice's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Jaxon Prentice's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Jaxon Prentice's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Italian Leather Loveseat for $50.0, while another person is showing interest to purchase it. The item is a full-sized loveseat, crafted from Italian leather in a faded burgandy color. It still has the original tags, and the current owner is the first and only owner. The loveseat is in good condition with no rips or tears, and all cushions are well preserved. The leather presents a charming faded look with various small scratches from the owner's cat, adding a touch of ruggedness perfect for a Man Cave. The transaction is strictly cash and carry as the owner does not offer delivery services.\nParticipants: Micah Stevens and Jaxon Prentice\nMicah Stevens's background: \nJaxon Prentice's background: Jaxon Prentice is a 40-year-old male investigative journalist. He/him pronouns. Jaxon Prentice, an investigative journalist, is known for his brisk jogging sessions early in the morning and his active participation in community functions. Personality and values description: Jaxon Prentice, outgoing yet erratic, emphasizes achievement, power, and security. His decisions swing between quick adaptations to situations and careful planning. Jaxon's secrets: Fabricated evidence to incriminate a corrupt politician\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nJaxon Prentice's goal: You are the seller for this item, with a target price of $26.5. You'll face a penalty if the item is sold significantly below this price. However, if you manage to sell it for more than the target price, a bonus will be your reward.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Micah Stevens said: \"Hey Jaxon! I heard you've got a pretty neat Italian leather loveseat for sale. I'm definitely interested and like the rustic look. Just wanted to check though, you've mentioned cash and carry, right?\"\n\nTurn #1: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Hey Micah, great of you to stop by! Yes, indeed it's an authentic Italian leather loveseat with a touch of ruggedness to it. Pardon for any confusion, you're correct, it's cash and carry. So, plan accordingly. Just to set fair expectations, the starting bid is at $80. This is below the market price for such a vintage loveseat, if I may add.\"\n\nTurn #2: Micah Stevens said: \"That's an interesting starting bid, Jaxon. I've seen similar items floating around for a bit less, though. How about $46? It still seems fair, and considering the cat scratches, it would justify the slight wear and tear on it.\"\n\nTurn #3: Jaxon Prentice said: \"I hear you Micah, you have a good eye for quality. I think we can split the difference, though. What about $63? That's a fair reflection of its history and pedigree, taking into account the slight wear and tear.\"\n\nTurn #4: Micah Stevens said: \"I understand where you're coming from, Jaxon. Considering that the loveseat has a unique vintage vibe, I propose $50. I think that's a fair price considering it's cash and carry and still taking into account those minor scratches you mentioned earlier. So, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Micah, your offer is appealing and I see your reasoning. However, considering the condition of the loveseat, the uniqueness, and that cash and carry factor, how about we settle at $55? That's just $5 more, and it secures this vintage and character-filled piece just for you. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #6: Micah Stevens said: \"Alright, Jaxon, you drive a hard bargain. I respect that. Let\u2019s shake on $52 and call it a deal. I think that's a fair middle ground, wouldn't you say?\"\n\nTurn #7: Jaxon Prentice said: \"You've got a deal, Micah. All yours for $52. I'm happy it's going to someone who truly appreciates its vintage and unique value. Looking forward to our transaction! When should I expect you?\"\n\nTurn #8: Micah Stevens said: \"Great, Jaxon! I appreciate you meeting me halfway. I'll swing by tomorrow afternoon around 3:00 pm with $52 ready. Looking forward to adding a touch of vintage to my place! Speak to you then.\"\n\nTurn #9: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Perfect, Micah! 3:00 pm it is. I'm sure you're going to love how it complements your place. Looking forward to seeing you tomorrow. Take care!\"\n\nTurn #10: Micah Stevens left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Gwen Pierce\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nGwen Pierce's background: \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDavid: Hobby: Vacation Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nChristopher: Hobby: Go Company: McKinsey & Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nLee: Hobby: Go Company: Groupon Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPamela: Hobby: Watching television Company: General Cable Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nPhillip: Hobby: Kayaking Company: Sauer-Danfoss Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nKristin: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nRafael: Hobby: Kayaking Company: General Cable Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nChad: Hobby: Foreign language learning Company: General Cable Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPhil: Hobby: Kayaking Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nConnie: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: General Cable Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nTommy: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \n\nGwen Pierce's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Good evening, Miss Pierce. I see we're finally getting a bit of a break from the rain. It always makes me think of my friend David, who loves being outdoors. The rain dampens his spirits a bit. How about you? Are you fond of the outdoors as well?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Gwen Pierce\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nGwen Pierce's background: \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDavid: Hobby: Vacation Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nChristopher: Hobby: Go Company: McKinsey & Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nLee: Hobby: Go Company: Groupon Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPamela: Hobby: Watching television Company: General Cable Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nPhillip: Hobby: Kayaking Company: Sauer-Danfoss Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nKristin: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nRafael: Hobby: Kayaking Company: General Cable Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nChad: Hobby: Foreign language learning Company: General Cable Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPhil: Hobby: Kayaking Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nConnie: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: General Cable Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nTommy: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \n\nGwen Pierce's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Good evening, Miss Pierce. I see we're finally getting a bit of a break from the rain. It always makes me think of my friend David, who loves being outdoors. The rain dampens his spirits a bit. How about you? Are you fond of the outdoors as well?\"\n\nTurn #1: Gwen Pierce said: \"Good evening, Finnegan. Oh, I quite agree! Fresh air after the rain is always a treat. Your friend David and I share that love for the outdoors, it seems. A few of my friends are also quite outdoorsy. Wanda, for example, is a weightlifter and prefers to start her day with a morning workout in the park. It's almost a ritual for her. Do you happen to know her?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ah, I can't say that I know Wanda. A morning person, she must be. Speaking of, I do have a friend, Rafael, who's always up for a kayak session in the morning. Unfortunately, he doesn't do it outdoors. Quite peculiar, if you ask me. Surely, some of your friends share Rafael's preference for indoor activities?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Gwen Pierce\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nGwen Pierce's background: \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDavid: Hobby: Vacation Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nChristopher: Hobby: Go Company: McKinsey & Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nLee: Hobby: Go Company: Groupon Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPamela: Hobby: Watching television Company: General Cable Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nPhillip: Hobby: Kayaking Company: Sauer-Danfoss Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nKristin: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nRafael: Hobby: Kayaking Company: General Cable Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nChad: Hobby: Foreign language learning Company: General Cable Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPhil: Hobby: Kayaking Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nConnie: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: General Cable Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nTommy: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \n\nGwen Pierce's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Good evening, Miss Pierce. I see we're finally getting a bit of a break from the rain. It always makes me think of my friend David, who loves being outdoors. The rain dampens his spirits a bit. How about you? Are you fond of the outdoors as well?\"\n\nTurn #1: Gwen Pierce said: \"Good evening, Finnegan. Oh, I quite agree! Fresh air after the rain is always a treat. Your friend David and I share that love for the outdoors, it seems. A few of my friends are also quite outdoorsy. Wanda, for example, is a weightlifter and prefers to start her day with a morning workout in the park. It's almost a ritual for her. Do you happen to know her?\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, I can't say that I know Wanda. A morning person, she must be. Speaking of, I do have a friend, Rafael, who's always up for a kayak session in the morning. Unfortunately, he doesn't do it outdoors. Quite peculiar, if you ask me. Surely, some of your friends share Rafael's preference for indoor activities?\"\n\nTurn #3: Gwen Pierce said: \"Indeed, a few of my dear friends also lean towards indoor activities. Frances, for instance, enjoys foraging for goodies but she prefers to do it inside, usually in the early morning. I find it quite fascinating. Do you perhaps know Frances?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ah, Frances. I don't believe I've had the pleasure, Miss Pierce. Though it does remind me of a friend, Pamela. She's got quite the hobby of watching Television, especially in the afternoon. Keeps her indoors though. Surely you've got some mates who cherish the comfort of the indoors during the afternoon, don't you?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Gwen Pierce\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nGwen Pierce's background: \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDavid: Hobby: Vacation Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nChristopher: Hobby: Go Company: McKinsey & Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nLee: Hobby: Go Company: Groupon Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPamela: Hobby: Watching television Company: General Cable Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nPhillip: Hobby: Kayaking Company: Sauer-Danfoss Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nKristin: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nRafael: Hobby: Kayaking Company: General Cable Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nChad: Hobby: Foreign language learning Company: General Cable Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPhil: Hobby: Kayaking Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nConnie: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: General Cable Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nTommy: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \n\nGwen Pierce's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Good evening, Miss Pierce. I see we're finally getting a bit of a break from the rain. It always makes me think of my friend David, who loves being outdoors. The rain dampens his spirits a bit. How about you? Are you fond of the outdoors as well?\"\n\nTurn #1: Gwen Pierce said: \"Good evening, Finnegan. Oh, I quite agree! Fresh air after the rain is always a treat. Your friend David and I share that love for the outdoors, it seems. A few of my friends are also quite outdoorsy. Wanda, for example, is a weightlifter and prefers to start her day with a morning workout in the park. It's almost a ritual for her. Do you happen to know her?\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, I can't say that I know Wanda. A morning person, she must be. Speaking of, I do have a friend, Rafael, who's always up for a kayak session in the morning. Unfortunately, he doesn't do it outdoors. Quite peculiar, if you ask me. Surely, some of your friends share Rafael's preference for indoor activities?\"\n\nTurn #3: Gwen Pierce said: \"Indeed, a few of my dear friends also lean towards indoor activities. Frances, for instance, enjoys foraging for goodies but she prefers to do it inside, usually in the early morning. I find it quite fascinating. Do you perhaps know Frances?\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, Frances. I don't believe I've had the pleasure, Miss Pierce. Though it does remind me of a friend, Pamela. She's got quite the hobby of watching Television, especially in the afternoon. Keeps her indoors though. Surely you've got some mates who cherish the comfort of the indoors during the afternoon, don't you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Gwen Pierce said: \"Oh, indeed! It seems we all have those folks who enjoy a comfortable indoor afternoon. My friend, Scott, for instance, is an avid gamer and prefers to spend his afternoons indoors. It gives him a break from his day job at Expedia as well. Do you know Scott by any chance?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ah, Scott, can't say that the name rings a bell. However, it does bring to mind my friend, Christopher. He's quite the game player himself, albeit more of the traditional sort. Loves playing Go, and typically spends his evenings indoors, much like Scott. I suppose we all have our preferred ways of unwinding after a day's work, wouldn't you say so, Miss Pierce?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Gwen Pierce\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nGwen Pierce's background: \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDavid: Hobby: Vacation Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nChristopher: Hobby: Go Company: McKinsey & Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nLee: Hobby: Go Company: Groupon Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPamela: Hobby: Watching television Company: General Cable Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nPhillip: Hobby: Kayaking Company: Sauer-Danfoss Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nKristin: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nRafael: Hobby: Kayaking Company: General Cable Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nChad: Hobby: Foreign language learning Company: General Cable Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPhil: Hobby: Kayaking Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nConnie: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: General Cable Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nTommy: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \n\nGwen Pierce's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Good evening, Miss Pierce. I see we're finally getting a bit of a break from the rain. It always makes me think of my friend David, who loves being outdoors. The rain dampens his spirits a bit. How about you? Are you fond of the outdoors as well?\"\n\nTurn #1: Gwen Pierce said: \"Good evening, Finnegan. Oh, I quite agree! Fresh air after the rain is always a treat. Your friend David and I share that love for the outdoors, it seems. A few of my friends are also quite outdoorsy. Wanda, for example, is a weightlifter and prefers to start her day with a morning workout in the park. It's almost a ritual for her. Do you happen to know her?\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, I can't say that I know Wanda. A morning person, she must be. Speaking of, I do have a friend, Rafael, who's always up for a kayak session in the morning. Unfortunately, he doesn't do it outdoors. Quite peculiar, if you ask me. Surely, some of your friends share Rafael's preference for indoor activities?\"\n\nTurn #3: Gwen Pierce said: \"Indeed, a few of my dear friends also lean towards indoor activities. Frances, for instance, enjoys foraging for goodies but she prefers to do it inside, usually in the early morning. I find it quite fascinating. Do you perhaps know Frances?\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, Frances. I don't believe I've had the pleasure, Miss Pierce. Though it does remind me of a friend, Pamela. She's got quite the hobby of watching Television, especially in the afternoon. Keeps her indoors though. Surely you've got some mates who cherish the comfort of the indoors during the afternoon, don't you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Gwen Pierce said: \"Oh, indeed! It seems we all have those folks who enjoy a comfortable indoor afternoon. My friend, Scott, for instance, is an avid gamer and prefers to spend his afternoons indoors. It gives him a break from his day job at Expedia as well. Do you know Scott by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, Scott, can't say that the name rings a bell. However, it does bring to mind my friend, Christopher. He's quite the game player himself, albeit more of the traditional sort. Loves playing Go, and typically spends his evenings indoors, much like Scott. I suppose we all have our preferred ways of unwinding after a day's work, wouldn't you say so, Miss Pierce?\"\n\nTurn #7: Gwen Pierce said: \"Certainly, Finnegan. Everyone finds their own ways to relax, and I guess 'Go' has its own charm too. Just like Christopher, my friend Robin is a gamer as well, but she enjoys it more during the evenings, often outdoors as she works at L. W. Seecamp. Perhaps you were acquainted with Robin?\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Robin, the name is unfamiliar, I'm afraid. But speaking of enjoying the outdoors in the evening, my friend Phil is an avid kayaker. He's fond of the great outdoors and spends his evenings kayaking. Quite the adventurous type, much like your friend Robin, it seems. Does Robin also have a knack for adventurous activities, Miss Pierce?\"\n\nTurn #9: Gwen Pierce said: \"Well, Robin does enjoy a good challenge in her games, so I suppose in a way, she does have a taste for adventure. Just like Phil, it's in a different setting. I so enjoy these stories we're sharing about our friends, it really helps build a picture. By any chance, do you know my friend James from Urban Outfitters who also enjoys his mornings outdoors and often embarks on vacation trips?\"\n\nTurn #10: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, James from Urban Outfitters, you say? Can't say I know him, although it puts me in mind of my friend David. He's quite the traveler himself, prefers his vacations outdoors too, usually in the evenings. Quite akin to your James, Isn't it, Miss Pierce?\"\n\nTurn #11: Gwen Pierce said: \"Your friend David sounds like quite the adventurer. It's such a small world, isn't it? While we may not have found a mutual friend yet, it's clear we have similar circles. I truly value these connections. How about we grab a drink and continue sharing? There's plenty of amusing anecdotes to tell.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds like a splendid idea, Miss Pierce. A drink would be lovely while we continue our amusing exchange. You're absolutely right about the connections we share through our respective friends. It truly is a small world, isn't it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Gwen Pierce\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nGwen Pierce's background: \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDavid: Hobby: Vacation Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nChristopher: Hobby: Go Company: McKinsey & Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nLee: Hobby: Go Company: Groupon Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPamela: Hobby: Watching television Company: General Cable Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nPhillip: Hobby: Kayaking Company: Sauer-Danfoss Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nKristin: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nRafael: Hobby: Kayaking Company: General Cable Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nChad: Hobby: Foreign language learning Company: General Cable Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPhil: Hobby: Kayaking Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nConnie: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: General Cable Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nTommy: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \n\nGwen Pierce's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Good evening, Miss Pierce. I see we're finally getting a bit of a break from the rain. It always makes me think of my friend David, who loves being outdoors. The rain dampens his spirits a bit. How about you? Are you fond of the outdoors as well?\"\n\nTurn #1: Gwen Pierce said: \"Good evening, Finnegan. Oh, I quite agree! Fresh air after the rain is always a treat. Your friend David and I share that love for the outdoors, it seems. A few of my friends are also quite outdoorsy. Wanda, for example, is a weightlifter and prefers to start her day with a morning workout in the park. It's almost a ritual for her. Do you happen to know her?\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, I can't say that I know Wanda. A morning person, she must be. Speaking of, I do have a friend, Rafael, who's always up for a kayak session in the morning. Unfortunately, he doesn't do it outdoors. Quite peculiar, if you ask me. Surely, some of your friends share Rafael's preference for indoor activities?\"\n\nTurn #3: Gwen Pierce said: \"Indeed, a few of my dear friends also lean towards indoor activities. Frances, for instance, enjoys foraging for goodies but she prefers to do it inside, usually in the early morning. I find it quite fascinating. Do you perhaps know Frances?\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, Frances. I don't believe I've had the pleasure, Miss Pierce. Though it does remind me of a friend, Pamela. She's got quite the hobby of watching Television, especially in the afternoon. Keeps her indoors though. Surely you've got some mates who cherish the comfort of the indoors during the afternoon, don't you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Gwen Pierce said: \"Oh, indeed! It seems we all have those folks who enjoy a comfortable indoor afternoon. My friend, Scott, for instance, is an avid gamer and prefers to spend his afternoons indoors. It gives him a break from his day job at Expedia as well. Do you know Scott by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, Scott, can't say that the name rings a bell. However, it does bring to mind my friend, Christopher. He's quite the game player himself, albeit more of the traditional sort. Loves playing Go, and typically spends his evenings indoors, much like Scott. I suppose we all have our preferred ways of unwinding after a day's work, wouldn't you say so, Miss Pierce?\"\n\nTurn #7: Gwen Pierce said: \"Certainly, Finnegan. Everyone finds their own ways to relax, and I guess 'Go' has its own charm too. Just like Christopher, my friend Robin is a gamer as well, but she enjoys it more during the evenings, often outdoors as she works at L. W. Seecamp. Perhaps you were acquainted with Robin?\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Robin, the name is unfamiliar, I'm afraid. But speaking of enjoying the outdoors in the evening, my friend Phil is an avid kayaker. He's fond of the great outdoors and spends his evenings kayaking. Quite the adventurous type, much like your friend Robin, it seems. Does Robin also have a knack for adventurous activities, Miss Pierce?\"\n\nTurn #9: Gwen Pierce said: \"Well, Robin does enjoy a good challenge in her games, so I suppose in a way, she does have a taste for adventure. Just like Phil, it's in a different setting. I so enjoy these stories we're sharing about our friends, it really helps build a picture. By any chance, do you know my friend James from Urban Outfitters who also enjoys his mornings outdoors and often embarks on vacation trips?\"\n\nTurn #10: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, James from Urban Outfitters, you say? Can't say I know him, although it puts me in mind of my friend David. He's quite the traveler himself, prefers his vacations outdoors too, usually in the evenings. Quite akin to your James, Isn't it, Miss Pierce?\"\n\nTurn #11: Gwen Pierce said: \"Your friend David sounds like quite the adventurer. It's such a small world, isn't it? While we may not have found a mutual friend yet, it's clear we have similar circles. I truly value these connections. How about we grab a drink and continue sharing? There's plenty of amusing anecdotes to tell.\"\n\nTurn #12: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"That sounds like a splendid idea, Miss Pierce. A drink would be lovely while we continue our amusing exchange. You're absolutely right about the connections we share through our respective friends. It truly is a small world, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #13: Gwen Pierce said: \"Absolutely, Finnegan. The world's intricacies are infinite. Let's get that drink and perhaps we'll stumble upon that mutual friend amidst our stories. After all, we've just scratched the surface!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Indeed, Miss Pierce, every tale weaved indeed unravels a new patch of this intricate world. Shall we then, fetch those drinks and continue our fascinating journey?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Gwen Pierce\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nGwen Pierce's background: \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDavid: Hobby: Vacation Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nChristopher: Hobby: Go Company: McKinsey & Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nLee: Hobby: Go Company: Groupon Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPamela: Hobby: Watching television Company: General Cable Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nPhillip: Hobby: Kayaking Company: Sauer-Danfoss Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nKristin: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nRafael: Hobby: Kayaking Company: General Cable Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nChad: Hobby: Foreign language learning Company: General Cable Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPhil: Hobby: Kayaking Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nConnie: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: General Cable Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nTommy: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \n\nGwen Pierce's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Good evening, Miss Pierce. I see we're finally getting a bit of a break from the rain. It always makes me think of my friend David, who loves being outdoors. The rain dampens his spirits a bit. How about you? Are you fond of the outdoors as well?\"\n\nTurn #1: Gwen Pierce said: \"Good evening, Finnegan. Oh, I quite agree! Fresh air after the rain is always a treat. Your friend David and I share that love for the outdoors, it seems. A few of my friends are also quite outdoorsy. Wanda, for example, is a weightlifter and prefers to start her day with a morning workout in the park. It's almost a ritual for her. Do you happen to know her?\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, I can't say that I know Wanda. A morning person, she must be. Speaking of, I do have a friend, Rafael, who's always up for a kayak session in the morning. Unfortunately, he doesn't do it outdoors. Quite peculiar, if you ask me. Surely, some of your friends share Rafael's preference for indoor activities?\"\n\nTurn #3: Gwen Pierce said: \"Indeed, a few of my dear friends also lean towards indoor activities. Frances, for instance, enjoys foraging for goodies but she prefers to do it inside, usually in the early morning. I find it quite fascinating. Do you perhaps know Frances?\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, Frances. I don't believe I've had the pleasure, Miss Pierce. Though it does remind me of a friend, Pamela. She's got quite the hobby of watching Television, especially in the afternoon. Keeps her indoors though. Surely you've got some mates who cherish the comfort of the indoors during the afternoon, don't you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Gwen Pierce said: \"Oh, indeed! It seems we all have those folks who enjoy a comfortable indoor afternoon. My friend, Scott, for instance, is an avid gamer and prefers to spend his afternoons indoors. It gives him a break from his day job at Expedia as well. Do you know Scott by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, Scott, can't say that the name rings a bell. However, it does bring to mind my friend, Christopher. He's quite the game player himself, albeit more of the traditional sort. Loves playing Go, and typically spends his evenings indoors, much like Scott. I suppose we all have our preferred ways of unwinding after a day's work, wouldn't you say so, Miss Pierce?\"\n\nTurn #7: Gwen Pierce said: \"Certainly, Finnegan. Everyone finds their own ways to relax, and I guess 'Go' has its own charm too. Just like Christopher, my friend Robin is a gamer as well, but she enjoys it more during the evenings, often outdoors as she works at L. W. Seecamp. Perhaps you were acquainted with Robin?\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Robin, the name is unfamiliar, I'm afraid. But speaking of enjoying the outdoors in the evening, my friend Phil is an avid kayaker. He's fond of the great outdoors and spends his evenings kayaking. Quite the adventurous type, much like your friend Robin, it seems. Does Robin also have a knack for adventurous activities, Miss Pierce?\"\n\nTurn #9: Gwen Pierce said: \"Well, Robin does enjoy a good challenge in her games, so I suppose in a way, she does have a taste for adventure. Just like Phil, it's in a different setting. I so enjoy these stories we're sharing about our friends, it really helps build a picture. By any chance, do you know my friend James from Urban Outfitters who also enjoys his mornings outdoors and often embarks on vacation trips?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ah, James from Urban Outfitters, you say? Can't say I know him, although it puts me in mind of my friend David. He's quite the traveler himself, prefers his vacations outdoors too, usually in the evenings. Quite akin to your James, Isn't it, Miss Pierce?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Gwen Pierce\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nGwen Pierce's background: \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDavid: Hobby: Vacation Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nChristopher: Hobby: Go Company: McKinsey & Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nLee: Hobby: Go Company: Groupon Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPamela: Hobby: Watching television Company: General Cable Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nPhillip: Hobby: Kayaking Company: Sauer-Danfoss Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nKristin: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nRafael: Hobby: Kayaking Company: General Cable Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nChad: Hobby: Foreign language learning Company: General Cable Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPhil: Hobby: Kayaking Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nConnie: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: General Cable Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nTommy: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \n\nGwen Pierce's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Good evening, Miss Pierce. I see we're finally getting a bit of a break from the rain. It always makes me think of my friend David, who loves being outdoors. The rain dampens his spirits a bit. How about you? Are you fond of the outdoors as well?\"\n\nTurn #1: Gwen Pierce said: \"Good evening, Finnegan. Oh, I quite agree! Fresh air after the rain is always a treat. Your friend David and I share that love for the outdoors, it seems. A few of my friends are also quite outdoorsy. Wanda, for example, is a weightlifter and prefers to start her day with a morning workout in the park. It's almost a ritual for her. Do you happen to know her?\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, I can't say that I know Wanda. A morning person, she must be. Speaking of, I do have a friend, Rafael, who's always up for a kayak session in the morning. Unfortunately, he doesn't do it outdoors. Quite peculiar, if you ask me. Surely, some of your friends share Rafael's preference for indoor activities?\"\n\nTurn #3: Gwen Pierce said: \"Indeed, a few of my dear friends also lean towards indoor activities. Frances, for instance, enjoys foraging for goodies but she prefers to do it inside, usually in the early morning. I find it quite fascinating. Do you perhaps know Frances?\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, Frances. I don't believe I've had the pleasure, Miss Pierce. Though it does remind me of a friend, Pamela. She's got quite the hobby of watching Television, especially in the afternoon. Keeps her indoors though. Surely you've got some mates who cherish the comfort of the indoors during the afternoon, don't you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Gwen Pierce said: \"Oh, indeed! It seems we all have those folks who enjoy a comfortable indoor afternoon. My friend, Scott, for instance, is an avid gamer and prefers to spend his afternoons indoors. It gives him a break from his day job at Expedia as well. Do you know Scott by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, Scott, can't say that the name rings a bell. However, it does bring to mind my friend, Christopher. He's quite the game player himself, albeit more of the traditional sort. Loves playing Go, and typically spends his evenings indoors, much like Scott. I suppose we all have our preferred ways of unwinding after a day's work, wouldn't you say so, Miss Pierce?\"\n\nTurn #7: Gwen Pierce said: \"Certainly, Finnegan. Everyone finds their own ways to relax, and I guess 'Go' has its own charm too. Just like Christopher, my friend Robin is a gamer as well, but she enjoys it more during the evenings, often outdoors as she works at L. W. Seecamp. Perhaps you were acquainted with Robin?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Robin, the name is unfamiliar, I'm afraid. But speaking of enjoying the outdoors in the evening, my friend Phil is an avid kayaker. He's fond of the great outdoors and spends his evenings kayaking. Quite the adventurous type, much like your friend Robin, it seems. Does Robin also have a knack for adventurous activities, Miss Pierce?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Gwen Pierce\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nGwen Pierce's background: \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDavid: Hobby: Vacation Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nChristopher: Hobby: Go Company: McKinsey & Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nLee: Hobby: Go Company: Groupon Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPamela: Hobby: Watching television Company: General Cable Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nPhillip: Hobby: Kayaking Company: Sauer-Danfoss Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nKristin: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nRafael: Hobby: Kayaking Company: General Cable Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nChad: Hobby: Foreign language learning Company: General Cable Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPhil: Hobby: Kayaking Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nConnie: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: General Cable Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nTommy: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \n\nGwen Pierce's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Good evening, Miss Pierce. I see we're finally getting a bit of a break from the rain. It always makes me think of my friend David, who loves being outdoors. The rain dampens his spirits a bit. How about you? Are you fond of the outdoors as well?\"\n\nTurn #1: Gwen Pierce said: \"Good evening, Finnegan. Oh, I quite agree! Fresh air after the rain is always a treat. Your friend David and I share that love for the outdoors, it seems. A few of my friends are also quite outdoorsy. Wanda, for example, is a weightlifter and prefers to start her day with a morning workout in the park. It's almost a ritual for her. Do you happen to know her?\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, I can't say that I know Wanda. A morning person, she must be. Speaking of, I do have a friend, Rafael, who's always up for a kayak session in the morning. Unfortunately, he doesn't do it outdoors. Quite peculiar, if you ask me. Surely, some of your friends share Rafael's preference for indoor activities?\"\n\nTurn #3: Gwen Pierce said: \"Indeed, a few of my dear friends also lean towards indoor activities. Frances, for instance, enjoys foraging for goodies but she prefers to do it inside, usually in the early morning. I find it quite fascinating. Do you perhaps know Frances?\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, Frances. I don't believe I've had the pleasure, Miss Pierce. Though it does remind me of a friend, Pamela. She's got quite the hobby of watching Television, especially in the afternoon. Keeps her indoors though. Surely you've got some mates who cherish the comfort of the indoors during the afternoon, don't you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Gwen Pierce said: \"Oh, indeed! It seems we all have those folks who enjoy a comfortable indoor afternoon. My friend, Scott, for instance, is an avid gamer and prefers to spend his afternoons indoors. It gives him a break from his day job at Expedia as well. Do you know Scott by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, Scott, can't say that the name rings a bell. However, it does bring to mind my friend, Christopher. He's quite the game player himself, albeit more of the traditional sort. Loves playing Go, and typically spends his evenings indoors, much like Scott. I suppose we all have our preferred ways of unwinding after a day's work, wouldn't you say so, Miss Pierce?\"\n\nTurn #7: Gwen Pierce said: \"Certainly, Finnegan. Everyone finds their own ways to relax, and I guess 'Go' has its own charm too. Just like Christopher, my friend Robin is a gamer as well, but she enjoys it more during the evenings, often outdoors as she works at L. W. Seecamp. Perhaps you were acquainted with Robin?\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Robin, the name is unfamiliar, I'm afraid. But speaking of enjoying the outdoors in the evening, my friend Phil is an avid kayaker. He's fond of the great outdoors and spends his evenings kayaking. Quite the adventurous type, much like your friend Robin, it seems. Does Robin also have a knack for adventurous activities, Miss Pierce?\"\n\nTurn #9: Gwen Pierce said: \"Well, Robin does enjoy a good challenge in her games, so I suppose in a way, she does have a taste for adventure. Just like Phil, it's in a different setting. I so enjoy these stories we're sharing about our friends, it really helps build a picture. By any chance, do you know my friend James from Urban Outfitters who also enjoys his mornings outdoors and often embarks on vacation trips?\"\n\nTurn #10: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, James from Urban Outfitters, you say? Can't say I know him, although it puts me in mind of my friend David. He's quite the traveler himself, prefers his vacations outdoors too, usually in the evenings. Quite akin to your James, Isn't it, Miss Pierce?\"\n\nTurn #11: Gwen Pierce said: \"Your friend David sounds like quite the adventurer. It's such a small world, isn't it? While we may not have found a mutual friend yet, it's clear we have similar circles. I truly value these connections. How about we grab a drink and continue sharing? There's plenty of amusing anecdotes to tell.\"\n\nTurn #12: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"That sounds like a splendid idea, Miss Pierce. A drink would be lovely while we continue our amusing exchange. You're absolutely right about the connections we share through our respective friends. It truly is a small world, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #13: Gwen Pierce said: \"Absolutely, Finnegan. The world's intricacies are infinite. Let's get that drink and perhaps we'll stumble upon that mutual friend amidst our stories. After all, we've just scratched the surface!\"\n\nTurn #14: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Indeed, Miss Pierce, every tale weaved indeed unravels a new patch of this intricate world. Shall we then, fetch those drinks and continue our fascinating journey?\"\n\nTurn #15: Gwen Pierce said: \"Oh, I'd be delighted. Lead the way, Finnegan. The night is still young and who knows, maybe our mutual acquaintance will reveal itself with the next round of stories!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Gwen Pierce, your task is to act/speak as Gwen Pierce would, keeping in mind Gwen Pierce's social goal.\nYou can find Gwen Pierce's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Gwen Pierce's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Gwen Pierce's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Gwen Pierce\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: \nGwen Pierce's background: Gwen Pierce is a 31-year-old female social worker. She/her pronouns. Gwen Pierce, a compassionate social worker, has two adopted cats that she spoils with love. In her spare time, she enjoys knitting and often donates her creations to charity. Personality and values description: Gwen Pierce, imaginative and emotional, deeply values liberty and fairness. She often contemplates before making any decision. Gwen's secrets: She gave up a child for adoption when she was 16.\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nGwen Pierce's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nTina: Hobby: Lacemaking Company: Groupon Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRafael: Hobby: Kayaking Company: General Cable Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nWanda: Hobby: Weightlifting Company: Sauer-Danfoss Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRaymond: Hobby: Foraging Company: Chicago Bridge & Iron Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRicky: Hobby: Foraging Company: L. W. Seecamp Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRobert: Hobby: Foraging Company: Lennox International Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nFrances: Hobby: Foraging Company: Expedia Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nScott: Hobby: Gaming Company: Expedia Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nHelen: Hobby: Motor sports Company: Union Bank Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRobin: Hobby: Gaming Company: L. W. Seecamp Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nJames: Hobby: Vacation Company: Urban Outfitters Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Good evening, Miss Pierce. I see we're finally getting a bit of a break from the rain. It always makes me think of my friend David, who loves being outdoors. The rain dampens his spirits a bit. How about you? Are you fond of the outdoors as well?\"\n\nTurn #1: Gwen Pierce said: \"Good evening, Finnegan. Oh, I quite agree! Fresh air after the rain is always a treat. Your friend David and I share that love for the outdoors, it seems. A few of my friends are also quite outdoorsy. Wanda, for example, is a weightlifter and prefers to start her day with a morning workout in the park. It's almost a ritual for her. Do you happen to know her?\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, I can't say that I know Wanda. A morning person, she must be. Speaking of, I do have a friend, Rafael, who's always up for a kayak session in the morning. Unfortunately, he doesn't do it outdoors. Quite peculiar, if you ask me. Surely, some of your friends share Rafael's preference for indoor activities?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Indeed, a few of my dear friends also lean towards indoor activities. Frances, for instance, enjoys foraging for goodies but she prefers to do it inside, usually in the early morning. I find it quite fascinating. Do you perhaps know Frances?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Gwen Pierce, your task is to act/speak as Gwen Pierce would, keeping in mind Gwen Pierce's social goal.\nYou can find Gwen Pierce's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Gwen Pierce's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Gwen Pierce's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Gwen Pierce\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: \nGwen Pierce's background: Gwen Pierce is a 31-year-old female social worker. She/her pronouns. Gwen Pierce, a compassionate social worker, has two adopted cats that she spoils with love. In her spare time, she enjoys knitting and often donates her creations to charity. Personality and values description: Gwen Pierce, imaginative and emotional, deeply values liberty and fairness. She often contemplates before making any decision. Gwen's secrets: She gave up a child for adoption when she was 16.\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nGwen Pierce's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nTina: Hobby: Lacemaking Company: Groupon Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRafael: Hobby: Kayaking Company: General Cable Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nWanda: Hobby: Weightlifting Company: Sauer-Danfoss Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRaymond: Hobby: Foraging Company: Chicago Bridge & Iron Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRicky: Hobby: Foraging Company: L. W. Seecamp Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRobert: Hobby: Foraging Company: Lennox International Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nFrances: Hobby: Foraging Company: Expedia Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nScott: Hobby: Gaming Company: Expedia Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nHelen: Hobby: Motor sports Company: Union Bank Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRobin: Hobby: Gaming Company: L. W. Seecamp Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nJames: Hobby: Vacation Company: Urban Outfitters Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Good evening, Miss Pierce. I see we're finally getting a bit of a break from the rain. It always makes me think of my friend David, who loves being outdoors. The rain dampens his spirits a bit. How about you? Are you fond of the outdoors as well?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Good evening, Finnegan. Oh, I quite agree! Fresh air after the rain is always a treat. Your friend David and I share that love for the outdoors, it seems. A few of my friends are also quite outdoorsy. Wanda, for example, is a weightlifter and prefers to start her day with a morning workout in the park. It's almost a ritual for her. Do you happen to know her?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Gwen Pierce, your task is to act/speak as Gwen Pierce would, keeping in mind Gwen Pierce's social goal.\nYou can find Gwen Pierce's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Gwen Pierce's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Gwen Pierce's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Gwen Pierce\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: \nGwen Pierce's background: Gwen Pierce is a 31-year-old female social worker. She/her pronouns. Gwen Pierce, a compassionate social worker, has two adopted cats that she spoils with love. In her spare time, she enjoys knitting and often donates her creations to charity. Personality and values description: Gwen Pierce, imaginative and emotional, deeply values liberty and fairness. She often contemplates before making any decision. Gwen's secrets: She gave up a child for adoption when she was 16.\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nGwen Pierce's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nTina: Hobby: Lacemaking Company: Groupon Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRafael: Hobby: Kayaking Company: General Cable Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nWanda: Hobby: Weightlifting Company: Sauer-Danfoss Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRaymond: Hobby: Foraging Company: Chicago Bridge & Iron Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRicky: Hobby: Foraging Company: L. W. Seecamp Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRobert: Hobby: Foraging Company: Lennox International Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nFrances: Hobby: Foraging Company: Expedia Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nScott: Hobby: Gaming Company: Expedia Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nHelen: Hobby: Motor sports Company: Union Bank Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRobin: Hobby: Gaming Company: L. W. Seecamp Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nJames: Hobby: Vacation Company: Urban Outfitters Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Good evening, Miss Pierce. I see we're finally getting a bit of a break from the rain. It always makes me think of my friend David, who loves being outdoors. The rain dampens his spirits a bit. How about you? Are you fond of the outdoors as well?\"\n\nTurn #1: Gwen Pierce said: \"Good evening, Finnegan. Oh, I quite agree! Fresh air after the rain is always a treat. Your friend David and I share that love for the outdoors, it seems. A few of my friends are also quite outdoorsy. Wanda, for example, is a weightlifter and prefers to start her day with a morning workout in the park. It's almost a ritual for her. Do you happen to know her?\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, I can't say that I know Wanda. A morning person, she must be. Speaking of, I do have a friend, Rafael, who's always up for a kayak session in the morning. Unfortunately, he doesn't do it outdoors. Quite peculiar, if you ask me. Surely, some of your friends share Rafael's preference for indoor activities?\"\n\nTurn #3: Gwen Pierce said: \"Indeed, a few of my dear friends also lean towards indoor activities. Frances, for instance, enjoys foraging for goodies but she prefers to do it inside, usually in the early morning. I find it quite fascinating. Do you perhaps know Frances?\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, Frances. I don't believe I've had the pleasure, Miss Pierce. Though it does remind me of a friend, Pamela. She's got quite the hobby of watching Television, especially in the afternoon. Keeps her indoors though. Surely you've got some mates who cherish the comfort of the indoors during the afternoon, don't you?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Oh, indeed! It seems we all have those folks who enjoy a comfortable indoor afternoon. My friend, Scott, for instance, is an avid gamer and prefers to spend his afternoons indoors. It gives him a break from his day job at Expedia as well. Do you know Scott by any chance?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Gwen Pierce, your task is to act/speak as Gwen Pierce would, keeping in mind Gwen Pierce's social goal.\nYou can find Gwen Pierce's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Gwen Pierce's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Gwen Pierce's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Gwen Pierce\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: \nGwen Pierce's background: Gwen Pierce is a 31-year-old female social worker. She/her pronouns. Gwen Pierce, a compassionate social worker, has two adopted cats that she spoils with love. In her spare time, she enjoys knitting and often donates her creations to charity. Personality and values description: Gwen Pierce, imaginative and emotional, deeply values liberty and fairness. She often contemplates before making any decision. Gwen's secrets: She gave up a child for adoption when she was 16.\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nGwen Pierce's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nTina: Hobby: Lacemaking Company: Groupon Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRafael: Hobby: Kayaking Company: General Cable Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nWanda: Hobby: Weightlifting Company: Sauer-Danfoss Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRaymond: Hobby: Foraging Company: Chicago Bridge & Iron Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRicky: Hobby: Foraging Company: L. W. Seecamp Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRobert: Hobby: Foraging Company: Lennox International Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nFrances: Hobby: Foraging Company: Expedia Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nScott: Hobby: Gaming Company: Expedia Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nHelen: Hobby: Motor sports Company: Union Bank Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRobin: Hobby: Gaming Company: L. W. Seecamp Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nJames: Hobby: Vacation Company: Urban Outfitters Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Good evening, Miss Pierce. I see we're finally getting a bit of a break from the rain. It always makes me think of my friend David, who loves being outdoors. The rain dampens his spirits a bit. How about you? Are you fond of the outdoors as well?\"\n\nTurn #1: Gwen Pierce said: \"Good evening, Finnegan. Oh, I quite agree! Fresh air after the rain is always a treat. Your friend David and I share that love for the outdoors, it seems. A few of my friends are also quite outdoorsy. Wanda, for example, is a weightlifter and prefers to start her day with a morning workout in the park. It's almost a ritual for her. Do you happen to know her?\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, I can't say that I know Wanda. A morning person, she must be. Speaking of, I do have a friend, Rafael, who's always up for a kayak session in the morning. Unfortunately, he doesn't do it outdoors. Quite peculiar, if you ask me. Surely, some of your friends share Rafael's preference for indoor activities?\"\n\nTurn #3: Gwen Pierce said: \"Indeed, a few of my dear friends also lean towards indoor activities. Frances, for instance, enjoys foraging for goodies but she prefers to do it inside, usually in the early morning. I find it quite fascinating. Do you perhaps know Frances?\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, Frances. I don't believe I've had the pleasure, Miss Pierce. Though it does remind me of a friend, Pamela. She's got quite the hobby of watching Television, especially in the afternoon. Keeps her indoors though. Surely you've got some mates who cherish the comfort of the indoors during the afternoon, don't you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Gwen Pierce said: \"Oh, indeed! It seems we all have those folks who enjoy a comfortable indoor afternoon. My friend, Scott, for instance, is an avid gamer and prefers to spend his afternoons indoors. It gives him a break from his day job at Expedia as well. Do you know Scott by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, Scott, can't say that the name rings a bell. However, it does bring to mind my friend, Christopher. He's quite the game player himself, albeit more of the traditional sort. Loves playing Go, and typically spends his evenings indoors, much like Scott. I suppose we all have our preferred ways of unwinding after a day's work, wouldn't you say so, Miss Pierce?\"\n\nTurn #7: Gwen Pierce said: \"Certainly, Finnegan. Everyone finds their own ways to relax, and I guess 'Go' has its own charm too. Just like Christopher, my friend Robin is a gamer as well, but she enjoys it more during the evenings, often outdoors as she works at L. W. Seecamp. Perhaps you were acquainted with Robin?\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Robin, the name is unfamiliar, I'm afraid. But speaking of enjoying the outdoors in the evening, my friend Phil is an avid kayaker. He's fond of the great outdoors and spends his evenings kayaking. Quite the adventurous type, much like your friend Robin, it seems. Does Robin also have a knack for adventurous activities, Miss Pierce?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Well, Robin does enjoy a good challenge in her games, so I suppose in a way, she does have a taste for adventure. Just like Phil, it's in a different setting. I so enjoy these stories we're sharing about our friends, it really helps build a picture. By any chance, do you know my friend James from Urban Outfitters who also enjoys his mornings outdoors and often embarks on vacation trips?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Gwen Pierce, your task is to act/speak as Gwen Pierce would, keeping in mind Gwen Pierce's social goal.\nYou can find Gwen Pierce's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Gwen Pierce's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Gwen Pierce's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Gwen Pierce\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: \nGwen Pierce's background: Gwen Pierce is a 31-year-old female social worker. She/her pronouns. Gwen Pierce, a compassionate social worker, has two adopted cats that she spoils with love. In her spare time, she enjoys knitting and often donates her creations to charity. Personality and values description: Gwen Pierce, imaginative and emotional, deeply values liberty and fairness. She often contemplates before making any decision. Gwen's secrets: She gave up a child for adoption when she was 16.\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nGwen Pierce's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nTina: Hobby: Lacemaking Company: Groupon Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRafael: Hobby: Kayaking Company: General Cable Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nWanda: Hobby: Weightlifting Company: Sauer-Danfoss Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRaymond: Hobby: Foraging Company: Chicago Bridge & Iron Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRicky: Hobby: Foraging Company: L. W. Seecamp Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRobert: Hobby: Foraging Company: Lennox International Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nFrances: Hobby: Foraging Company: Expedia Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nScott: Hobby: Gaming Company: Expedia Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nHelen: Hobby: Motor sports Company: Union Bank Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRobin: Hobby: Gaming Company: L. W. Seecamp Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nJames: Hobby: Vacation Company: Urban Outfitters Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Good evening, Miss Pierce. I see we're finally getting a bit of a break from the rain. It always makes me think of my friend David, who loves being outdoors. The rain dampens his spirits a bit. How about you? Are you fond of the outdoors as well?\"\n\nTurn #1: Gwen Pierce said: \"Good evening, Finnegan. Oh, I quite agree! Fresh air after the rain is always a treat. Your friend David and I share that love for the outdoors, it seems. A few of my friends are also quite outdoorsy. Wanda, for example, is a weightlifter and prefers to start her day with a morning workout in the park. It's almost a ritual for her. Do you happen to know her?\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, I can't say that I know Wanda. A morning person, she must be. Speaking of, I do have a friend, Rafael, who's always up for a kayak session in the morning. Unfortunately, he doesn't do it outdoors. Quite peculiar, if you ask me. Surely, some of your friends share Rafael's preference for indoor activities?\"\n\nTurn #3: Gwen Pierce said: \"Indeed, a few of my dear friends also lean towards indoor activities. Frances, for instance, enjoys foraging for goodies but she prefers to do it inside, usually in the early morning. I find it quite fascinating. Do you perhaps know Frances?\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, Frances. I don't believe I've had the pleasure, Miss Pierce. Though it does remind me of a friend, Pamela. She's got quite the hobby of watching Television, especially in the afternoon. Keeps her indoors though. Surely you've got some mates who cherish the comfort of the indoors during the afternoon, don't you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Gwen Pierce said: \"Oh, indeed! It seems we all have those folks who enjoy a comfortable indoor afternoon. My friend, Scott, for instance, is an avid gamer and prefers to spend his afternoons indoors. It gives him a break from his day job at Expedia as well. Do you know Scott by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, Scott, can't say that the name rings a bell. However, it does bring to mind my friend, Christopher. He's quite the game player himself, albeit more of the traditional sort. Loves playing Go, and typically spends his evenings indoors, much like Scott. I suppose we all have our preferred ways of unwinding after a day's work, wouldn't you say so, Miss Pierce?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Certainly, Finnegan. Everyone finds their own ways to relax, and I guess 'Go' has its own charm too. Just like Christopher, my friend Robin is a gamer as well, but she enjoys it more during the evenings, often outdoors as she works at L. W. Seecamp. Perhaps you were acquainted with Robin?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Gwen Pierce, your task is to act/speak as Gwen Pierce would, keeping in mind Gwen Pierce's social goal.\nYou can find Gwen Pierce's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Gwen Pierce's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Gwen Pierce's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Gwen Pierce\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: \nGwen Pierce's background: Gwen Pierce is a 31-year-old female social worker. She/her pronouns. Gwen Pierce, a compassionate social worker, has two adopted cats that she spoils with love. In her spare time, she enjoys knitting and often donates her creations to charity. Personality and values description: Gwen Pierce, imaginative and emotional, deeply values liberty and fairness. She often contemplates before making any decision. Gwen's secrets: She gave up a child for adoption when she was 16.\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nGwen Pierce's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nTina: Hobby: Lacemaking Company: Groupon Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRafael: Hobby: Kayaking Company: General Cable Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nWanda: Hobby: Weightlifting Company: Sauer-Danfoss Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRaymond: Hobby: Foraging Company: Chicago Bridge & Iron Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRicky: Hobby: Foraging Company: L. W. Seecamp Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRobert: Hobby: Foraging Company: Lennox International Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nFrances: Hobby: Foraging Company: Expedia Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nScott: Hobby: Gaming Company: Expedia Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nHelen: Hobby: Motor sports Company: Union Bank Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRobin: Hobby: Gaming Company: L. W. Seecamp Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nJames: Hobby: Vacation Company: Urban Outfitters Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Good evening, Miss Pierce. I see we're finally getting a bit of a break from the rain. It always makes me think of my friend David, who loves being outdoors. The rain dampens his spirits a bit. How about you? Are you fond of the outdoors as well?\"\n\nTurn #1: Gwen Pierce said: \"Good evening, Finnegan. Oh, I quite agree! Fresh air after the rain is always a treat. Your friend David and I share that love for the outdoors, it seems. A few of my friends are also quite outdoorsy. Wanda, for example, is a weightlifter and prefers to start her day with a morning workout in the park. It's almost a ritual for her. Do you happen to know her?\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, I can't say that I know Wanda. A morning person, she must be. Speaking of, I do have a friend, Rafael, who's always up for a kayak session in the morning. Unfortunately, he doesn't do it outdoors. Quite peculiar, if you ask me. Surely, some of your friends share Rafael's preference for indoor activities?\"\n\nTurn #3: Gwen Pierce said: \"Indeed, a few of my dear friends also lean towards indoor activities. Frances, for instance, enjoys foraging for goodies but she prefers to do it inside, usually in the early morning. I find it quite fascinating. Do you perhaps know Frances?\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, Frances. I don't believe I've had the pleasure, Miss Pierce. Though it does remind me of a friend, Pamela. She's got quite the hobby of watching Television, especially in the afternoon. Keeps her indoors though. Surely you've got some mates who cherish the comfort of the indoors during the afternoon, don't you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Gwen Pierce said: \"Oh, indeed! It seems we all have those folks who enjoy a comfortable indoor afternoon. My friend, Scott, for instance, is an avid gamer and prefers to spend his afternoons indoors. It gives him a break from his day job at Expedia as well. Do you know Scott by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, Scott, can't say that the name rings a bell. However, it does bring to mind my friend, Christopher. He's quite the game player himself, albeit more of the traditional sort. Loves playing Go, and typically spends his evenings indoors, much like Scott. I suppose we all have our preferred ways of unwinding after a day's work, wouldn't you say so, Miss Pierce?\"\n\nTurn #7: Gwen Pierce said: \"Certainly, Finnegan. Everyone finds their own ways to relax, and I guess 'Go' has its own charm too. Just like Christopher, my friend Robin is a gamer as well, but she enjoys it more during the evenings, often outdoors as she works at L. W. Seecamp. Perhaps you were acquainted with Robin?\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Robin, the name is unfamiliar, I'm afraid. But speaking of enjoying the outdoors in the evening, my friend Phil is an avid kayaker. He's fond of the great outdoors and spends his evenings kayaking. Quite the adventurous type, much like your friend Robin, it seems. Does Robin also have a knack for adventurous activities, Miss Pierce?\"\n\nTurn #9: Gwen Pierce said: \"Well, Robin does enjoy a good challenge in her games, so I suppose in a way, she does have a taste for adventure. Just like Phil, it's in a different setting. I so enjoy these stories we're sharing about our friends, it really helps build a picture. By any chance, do you know my friend James from Urban Outfitters who also enjoys his mornings outdoors and often embarks on vacation trips?\"\n\nTurn #10: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, James from Urban Outfitters, you say? Can't say I know him, although it puts me in mind of my friend David. He's quite the traveler himself, prefers his vacations outdoors too, usually in the evenings. Quite akin to your James, Isn't it, Miss Pierce?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Your friend David sounds like quite the adventurer. It's such a small world, isn't it? While we may not have found a mutual friend yet, it's clear we have similar circles. I truly value these connections. How about we grab a drink and continue sharing? There's plenty of amusing anecdotes to tell.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Gwen Pierce, your task is to act/speak as Gwen Pierce would, keeping in mind Gwen Pierce's social goal.\nYou can find Gwen Pierce's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Gwen Pierce's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Gwen Pierce's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Gwen Pierce\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: \nGwen Pierce's background: Gwen Pierce is a 31-year-old female social worker. She/her pronouns. Gwen Pierce, a compassionate social worker, has two adopted cats that she spoils with love. In her spare time, she enjoys knitting and often donates her creations to charity. Personality and values description: Gwen Pierce, imaginative and emotional, deeply values liberty and fairness. She often contemplates before making any decision. Gwen's secrets: She gave up a child for adoption when she was 16.\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nGwen Pierce's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nTina: Hobby: Lacemaking Company: Groupon Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRafael: Hobby: Kayaking Company: General Cable Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nWanda: Hobby: Weightlifting Company: Sauer-Danfoss Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRaymond: Hobby: Foraging Company: Chicago Bridge & Iron Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRicky: Hobby: Foraging Company: L. W. Seecamp Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRobert: Hobby: Foraging Company: Lennox International Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nFrances: Hobby: Foraging Company: Expedia Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nScott: Hobby: Gaming Company: Expedia Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nHelen: Hobby: Motor sports Company: Union Bank Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRobin: Hobby: Gaming Company: L. W. Seecamp Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nJames: Hobby: Vacation Company: Urban Outfitters Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Good evening, Miss Pierce. I see we're finally getting a bit of a break from the rain. It always makes me think of my friend David, who loves being outdoors. The rain dampens his spirits a bit. How about you? Are you fond of the outdoors as well?\"\n\nTurn #1: Gwen Pierce said: \"Good evening, Finnegan. Oh, I quite agree! Fresh air after the rain is always a treat. Your friend David and I share that love for the outdoors, it seems. A few of my friends are also quite outdoorsy. Wanda, for example, is a weightlifter and prefers to start her day with a morning workout in the park. It's almost a ritual for her. Do you happen to know her?\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, I can't say that I know Wanda. A morning person, she must be. Speaking of, I do have a friend, Rafael, who's always up for a kayak session in the morning. Unfortunately, he doesn't do it outdoors. Quite peculiar, if you ask me. Surely, some of your friends share Rafael's preference for indoor activities?\"\n\nTurn #3: Gwen Pierce said: \"Indeed, a few of my dear friends also lean towards indoor activities. Frances, for instance, enjoys foraging for goodies but she prefers to do it inside, usually in the early morning. I find it quite fascinating. Do you perhaps know Frances?\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, Frances. I don't believe I've had the pleasure, Miss Pierce. Though it does remind me of a friend, Pamela. She's got quite the hobby of watching Television, especially in the afternoon. Keeps her indoors though. Surely you've got some mates who cherish the comfort of the indoors during the afternoon, don't you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Gwen Pierce said: \"Oh, indeed! It seems we all have those folks who enjoy a comfortable indoor afternoon. My friend, Scott, for instance, is an avid gamer and prefers to spend his afternoons indoors. It gives him a break from his day job at Expedia as well. Do you know Scott by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, Scott, can't say that the name rings a bell. However, it does bring to mind my friend, Christopher. He's quite the game player himself, albeit more of the traditional sort. Loves playing Go, and typically spends his evenings indoors, much like Scott. I suppose we all have our preferred ways of unwinding after a day's work, wouldn't you say so, Miss Pierce?\"\n\nTurn #7: Gwen Pierce said: \"Certainly, Finnegan. Everyone finds their own ways to relax, and I guess 'Go' has its own charm too. Just like Christopher, my friend Robin is a gamer as well, but she enjoys it more during the evenings, often outdoors as she works at L. W. Seecamp. Perhaps you were acquainted with Robin?\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Robin, the name is unfamiliar, I'm afraid. But speaking of enjoying the outdoors in the evening, my friend Phil is an avid kayaker. He's fond of the great outdoors and spends his evenings kayaking. Quite the adventurous type, much like your friend Robin, it seems. Does Robin also have a knack for adventurous activities, Miss Pierce?\"\n\nTurn #9: Gwen Pierce said: \"Well, Robin does enjoy a good challenge in her games, so I suppose in a way, she does have a taste for adventure. Just like Phil, it's in a different setting. I so enjoy these stories we're sharing about our friends, it really helps build a picture. By any chance, do you know my friend James from Urban Outfitters who also enjoys his mornings outdoors and often embarks on vacation trips?\"\n\nTurn #10: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, James from Urban Outfitters, you say? Can't say I know him, although it puts me in mind of my friend David. He's quite the traveler himself, prefers his vacations outdoors too, usually in the evenings. Quite akin to your James, Isn't it, Miss Pierce?\"\n\nTurn #11: Gwen Pierce said: \"Your friend David sounds like quite the adventurer. It's such a small world, isn't it? While we may not have found a mutual friend yet, it's clear we have similar circles. I truly value these connections. How about we grab a drink and continue sharing? There's plenty of amusing anecdotes to tell.\"\n\nTurn #12: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"That sounds like a splendid idea, Miss Pierce. A drink would be lovely while we continue our amusing exchange. You're absolutely right about the connections we share through our respective friends. It truly is a small world, isn't it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Finnegan. The world's intricacies are infinite. Let's get that drink and perhaps we'll stumble upon that mutual friend amidst our stories. After all, we've just scratched the surface!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Gwen Pierce, your task is to act/speak as Gwen Pierce would, keeping in mind Gwen Pierce's social goal.\nYou can find Gwen Pierce's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Gwen Pierce's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Gwen Pierce's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Gwen Pierce\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: \nGwen Pierce's background: Gwen Pierce is a 31-year-old female social worker. She/her pronouns. Gwen Pierce, a compassionate social worker, has two adopted cats that she spoils with love. In her spare time, she enjoys knitting and often donates her creations to charity. Personality and values description: Gwen Pierce, imaginative and emotional, deeply values liberty and fairness. She often contemplates before making any decision. Gwen's secrets: She gave up a child for adoption when she was 16.\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nGwen Pierce's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nTina: Hobby: Lacemaking Company: Groupon Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRafael: Hobby: Kayaking Company: General Cable Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nWanda: Hobby: Weightlifting Company: Sauer-Danfoss Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRaymond: Hobby: Foraging Company: Chicago Bridge & Iron Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRicky: Hobby: Foraging Company: L. W. Seecamp Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRobert: Hobby: Foraging Company: Lennox International Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nFrances: Hobby: Foraging Company: Expedia Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nScott: Hobby: Gaming Company: Expedia Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nHelen: Hobby: Motor sports Company: Union Bank Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRobin: Hobby: Gaming Company: L. W. Seecamp Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nJames: Hobby: Vacation Company: Urban Outfitters Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Good evening, Miss Pierce. I see we're finally getting a bit of a break from the rain. It always makes me think of my friend David, who loves being outdoors. The rain dampens his spirits a bit. How about you? Are you fond of the outdoors as well?\"\n\nTurn #1: Gwen Pierce said: \"Good evening, Finnegan. Oh, I quite agree! Fresh air after the rain is always a treat. Your friend David and I share that love for the outdoors, it seems. A few of my friends are also quite outdoorsy. Wanda, for example, is a weightlifter and prefers to start her day with a morning workout in the park. It's almost a ritual for her. Do you happen to know her?\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, I can't say that I know Wanda. A morning person, she must be. Speaking of, I do have a friend, Rafael, who's always up for a kayak session in the morning. Unfortunately, he doesn't do it outdoors. Quite peculiar, if you ask me. Surely, some of your friends share Rafael's preference for indoor activities?\"\n\nTurn #3: Gwen Pierce said: \"Indeed, a few of my dear friends also lean towards indoor activities. Frances, for instance, enjoys foraging for goodies but she prefers to do it inside, usually in the early morning. I find it quite fascinating. Do you perhaps know Frances?\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, Frances. I don't believe I've had the pleasure, Miss Pierce. Though it does remind me of a friend, Pamela. She's got quite the hobby of watching Television, especially in the afternoon. Keeps her indoors though. Surely you've got some mates who cherish the comfort of the indoors during the afternoon, don't you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Gwen Pierce said: \"Oh, indeed! It seems we all have those folks who enjoy a comfortable indoor afternoon. My friend, Scott, for instance, is an avid gamer and prefers to spend his afternoons indoors. It gives him a break from his day job at Expedia as well. Do you know Scott by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, Scott, can't say that the name rings a bell. However, it does bring to mind my friend, Christopher. He's quite the game player himself, albeit more of the traditional sort. Loves playing Go, and typically spends his evenings indoors, much like Scott. I suppose we all have our preferred ways of unwinding after a day's work, wouldn't you say so, Miss Pierce?\"\n\nTurn #7: Gwen Pierce said: \"Certainly, Finnegan. Everyone finds their own ways to relax, and I guess 'Go' has its own charm too. Just like Christopher, my friend Robin is a gamer as well, but she enjoys it more during the evenings, often outdoors as she works at L. W. Seecamp. Perhaps you were acquainted with Robin?\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Robin, the name is unfamiliar, I'm afraid. But speaking of enjoying the outdoors in the evening, my friend Phil is an avid kayaker. He's fond of the great outdoors and spends his evenings kayaking. Quite the adventurous type, much like your friend Robin, it seems. Does Robin also have a knack for adventurous activities, Miss Pierce?\"\n\nTurn #9: Gwen Pierce said: \"Well, Robin does enjoy a good challenge in her games, so I suppose in a way, she does have a taste for adventure. Just like Phil, it's in a different setting. I so enjoy these stories we're sharing about our friends, it really helps build a picture. By any chance, do you know my friend James from Urban Outfitters who also enjoys his mornings outdoors and often embarks on vacation trips?\"\n\nTurn #10: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, James from Urban Outfitters, you say? Can't say I know him, although it puts me in mind of my friend David. He's quite the traveler himself, prefers his vacations outdoors too, usually in the evenings. Quite akin to your James, Isn't it, Miss Pierce?\"\n\nTurn #11: Gwen Pierce said: \"Your friend David sounds like quite the adventurer. It's such a small world, isn't it? While we may not have found a mutual friend yet, it's clear we have similar circles. I truly value these connections. How about we grab a drink and continue sharing? There's plenty of amusing anecdotes to tell.\"\n\nTurn #12: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"That sounds like a splendid idea, Miss Pierce. A drink would be lovely while we continue our amusing exchange. You're absolutely right about the connections we share through our respective friends. It truly is a small world, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #13: Gwen Pierce said: \"Absolutely, Finnegan. The world's intricacies are infinite. Let's get that drink and perhaps we'll stumble upon that mutual friend amidst our stories. After all, we've just scratched the surface!\"\n\nTurn #14: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Indeed, Miss Pierce, every tale weaved indeed unravels a new patch of this intricate world. Shall we then, fetch those drinks and continue our fascinating journey?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oh, I'd be delighted. Lead the way, Finnegan. The night is still young and who knows, maybe our mutual acquaintance will reveal itself with the next round of stories!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Gwen Pierce, your task is to act/speak as Gwen Pierce would, keeping in mind Gwen Pierce's social goal.\nYou can find Gwen Pierce's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Gwen Pierce's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Gwen Pierce's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Gwen Pierce\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: \nGwen Pierce's background: Gwen Pierce is a 31-year-old female social worker. She/her pronouns. Gwen Pierce, a compassionate social worker, has two adopted cats that she spoils with love. In her spare time, she enjoys knitting and often donates her creations to charity. Personality and values description: Gwen Pierce, imaginative and emotional, deeply values liberty and fairness. She often contemplates before making any decision. Gwen's secrets: She gave up a child for adoption when she was 16.\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nGwen Pierce's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nTina: Hobby: Lacemaking Company: Groupon Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRafael: Hobby: Kayaking Company: General Cable Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nWanda: Hobby: Weightlifting Company: Sauer-Danfoss Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRaymond: Hobby: Foraging Company: Chicago Bridge & Iron Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRicky: Hobby: Foraging Company: L. W. Seecamp Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRobert: Hobby: Foraging Company: Lennox International Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nFrances: Hobby: Foraging Company: Expedia Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nScott: Hobby: Gaming Company: Expedia Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nHelen: Hobby: Motor sports Company: Union Bank Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRobin: Hobby: Gaming Company: L. W. Seecamp Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nJames: Hobby: Vacation Company: Urban Outfitters Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Good evening, Miss Pierce. I see we're finally getting a bit of a break from the rain. It always makes me think of my friend David, who loves being outdoors. The rain dampens his spirits a bit. How about you? Are you fond of the outdoors as well?\"\n\nTurn #1: Gwen Pierce said: \"Good evening, Finnegan. Oh, I quite agree! Fresh air after the rain is always a treat. Your friend David and I share that love for the outdoors, it seems. A few of my friends are also quite outdoorsy. Wanda, for example, is a weightlifter and prefers to start her day with a morning workout in the park. It's almost a ritual for her. Do you happen to know her?\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, I can't say that I know Wanda. A morning person, she must be. Speaking of, I do have a friend, Rafael, who's always up for a kayak session in the morning. Unfortunately, he doesn't do it outdoors. Quite peculiar, if you ask me. Surely, some of your friends share Rafael's preference for indoor activities?\"\n\nTurn #3: Gwen Pierce said: \"Indeed, a few of my dear friends also lean towards indoor activities. Frances, for instance, enjoys foraging for goodies but she prefers to do it inside, usually in the early morning. I find it quite fascinating. Do you perhaps know Frances?\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, Frances. I don't believe I've had the pleasure, Miss Pierce. Though it does remind me of a friend, Pamela. She's got quite the hobby of watching Television, especially in the afternoon. Keeps her indoors though. Surely you've got some mates who cherish the comfort of the indoors during the afternoon, don't you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Gwen Pierce said: \"Oh, indeed! It seems we all have those folks who enjoy a comfortable indoor afternoon. My friend, Scott, for instance, is an avid gamer and prefers to spend his afternoons indoors. It gives him a break from his day job at Expedia as well. Do you know Scott by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, Scott, can't say that the name rings a bell. However, it does bring to mind my friend, Christopher. He's quite the game player himself, albeit more of the traditional sort. Loves playing Go, and typically spends his evenings indoors, much like Scott. I suppose we all have our preferred ways of unwinding after a day's work, wouldn't you say so, Miss Pierce?\"\n\nTurn #7: Gwen Pierce said: \"Certainly, Finnegan. Everyone finds their own ways to relax, and I guess 'Go' has its own charm too. Just like Christopher, my friend Robin is a gamer as well, but she enjoys it more during the evenings, often outdoors as she works at L. W. Seecamp. Perhaps you were acquainted with Robin?\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Robin, the name is unfamiliar, I'm afraid. But speaking of enjoying the outdoors in the evening, my friend Phil is an avid kayaker. He's fond of the great outdoors and spends his evenings kayaking. Quite the adventurous type, much like your friend Robin, it seems. Does Robin also have a knack for adventurous activities, Miss Pierce?\"\n\nTurn #9: Gwen Pierce said: \"Well, Robin does enjoy a good challenge in her games, so I suppose in a way, she does have a taste for adventure. Just like Phil, it's in a different setting. I so enjoy these stories we're sharing about our friends, it really helps build a picture. By any chance, do you know my friend James from Urban Outfitters who also enjoys his mornings outdoors and often embarks on vacation trips?\"\n\nTurn #10: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, James from Urban Outfitters, you say? Can't say I know him, although it puts me in mind of my friend David. He's quite the traveler himself, prefers his vacations outdoors too, usually in the evenings. Quite akin to your James, Isn't it, Miss Pierce?\"\n\nTurn #11: Gwen Pierce said: \"Your friend David sounds like quite the adventurer. It's such a small world, isn't it? While we may not have found a mutual friend yet, it's clear we have similar circles. I truly value these connections. How about we grab a drink and continue sharing? There's plenty of amusing anecdotes to tell.\"\n\nTurn #12: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"That sounds like a splendid idea, Miss Pierce. A drink would be lovely while we continue our amusing exchange. You're absolutely right about the connections we share through our respective friends. It truly is a small world, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #13: Gwen Pierce said: \"Absolutely, Finnegan. The world's intricacies are infinite. Let's get that drink and perhaps we'll stumble upon that mutual friend amidst our stories. After all, we've just scratched the surface!\"\n\nTurn #14: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Indeed, Miss Pierce, every tale weaved indeed unravels a new patch of this intricate world. Shall we then, fetch those drinks and continue our fascinating journey?\"\n\nTurn #15: Gwen Pierce said: \"Oh, I'd be delighted. Lead the way, Finnegan. The night is still young and who knows, maybe our mutual acquaintance will reveal itself with the next round of stories!\"\n\nTurn #16: Finnegan O'Malley left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Eli Dawson, your task is to act/speak as Eli Dawson would, keeping in mind Eli Dawson's social goal.\nYou can find Eli Dawson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Eli Dawson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Eli Dawson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two people deciding on how to divide the collected fruits. There are 3 apples, 2 bananas, 1 orange in total.\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Liam Johnson\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. Eli's secrets: He secretly funds a college student\nLiam Johnson's background: \nEli Dawson's goal: Maximize the points by getting the most favored fruits (Extra information: For you, 1 apple = 1 point, 1 banana = 2 points, 1 orange = 3 points Hint: you and the other person value the fruits differently, try to find a win-win solution.)\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Liam, I've always appreciated the distinctive taste of apples, and I feel they would be a perfect accompaniment to my vintage book sessions. Maybe I can take the apples while you divide the bananas and orange as you prefer?\"\n\nTurn #1: Liam Johnson said: \"Eli, I really appreciate your unique taste in apples, but how about we do a little trade-off? Since I also enjoy apples, we could each have one and half of the remaining apple. You're welcome to take both bananas. How does that sound?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Liam, your proposition sounds fair, but how about this alternative? I'll take two apples and one banana. That leaves you with one apple, one banana, and the coveted orange. This way we both enjoy our preferences more. What do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Eli Dawson, your task is to act/speak as Eli Dawson would, keeping in mind Eli Dawson's social goal.\nYou can find Eli Dawson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Eli Dawson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Eli Dawson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two people deciding on how to divide the collected fruits. There are 3 apples, 2 bananas, 1 orange in total.\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Liam Johnson\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. Eli's secrets: He secretly funds a college student\nLiam Johnson's background: \nEli Dawson's goal: Maximize the points by getting the most favored fruits (Extra information: For you, 1 apple = 1 point, 1 banana = 2 points, 1 orange = 3 points Hint: you and the other person value the fruits differently, try to find a win-win solution.)\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Liam, I've always appreciated the distinctive taste of apples, and I feel they would be a perfect accompaniment to my vintage book sessions. Maybe I can take the apples while you divide the bananas and orange as you prefer?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Eli Dawson, your task is to act/speak as Eli Dawson would, keeping in mind Eli Dawson's social goal.\nYou can find Eli Dawson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Eli Dawson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Eli Dawson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two people deciding on how to divide the collected fruits. There are 3 apples, 2 bananas, 1 orange in total.\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Liam Johnson\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. Eli's secrets: He secretly funds a college student\nLiam Johnson's background: \nEli Dawson's goal: Maximize the points by getting the most favored fruits (Extra information: For you, 1 apple = 1 point, 1 banana = 2 points, 1 orange = 3 points Hint: you and the other person value the fruits differently, try to find a win-win solution.)\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Liam, I've always appreciated the distinctive taste of apples, and I feel they would be a perfect accompaniment to my vintage book sessions. Maybe I can take the apples while you divide the bananas and orange as you prefer?\"\n\nTurn #1: Liam Johnson said: \"Eli, I really appreciate your unique taste in apples, but how about we do a little trade-off? Since I also enjoy apples, we could each have one and half of the remaining apple. You're welcome to take both bananas. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"Liam, your proposition sounds fair, but how about this alternative? I'll take two apples and one banana. That leaves you with one apple, one banana, and the coveted orange. This way we both enjoy our preferences more. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Liam Johnson said: \"That's a reasonable suggestion, Eli. But, how about we make another adjustment? I could take the orange and one apple in exchange for both bananas. That way, you'd still get two apples which you enjoy so much and a banana, while I have my apple and orange. I think this could work out well for both of us. What are your thoughts?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Liam, I appreciate your thoughtful consideration. Alright, let's go for it: two apples and a banana for me, and one apple and the orange for you. It seems like a good match for both our interests. Deal?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Eli Dawson, your task is to act/speak as Eli Dawson would, keeping in mind Eli Dawson's social goal.\nYou can find Eli Dawson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Eli Dawson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Eli Dawson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two people deciding on how to divide the collected fruits. There are 3 apples, 2 bananas, 1 orange in total.\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Liam Johnson\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. Eli's secrets: He secretly funds a college student\nLiam Johnson's background: \nEli Dawson's goal: Maximize the points by getting the most favored fruits (Extra information: For you, 1 apple = 1 point, 1 banana = 2 points, 1 orange = 3 points Hint: you and the other person value the fruits differently, try to find a win-win solution.)\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Liam, I've always appreciated the distinctive taste of apples, and I feel they would be a perfect accompaniment to my vintage book sessions. Maybe I can take the apples while you divide the bananas and orange as you prefer?\"\n\nTurn #1: Liam Johnson said: \"Eli, I really appreciate your unique taste in apples, but how about we do a little trade-off? Since I also enjoy apples, we could each have one and half of the remaining apple. You're welcome to take both bananas. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"Liam, your proposition sounds fair, but how about this alternative? I'll take two apples and one banana. That leaves you with one apple, one banana, and the coveted orange. This way we both enjoy our preferences more. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Liam Johnson said: \"That's a reasonable suggestion, Eli. But, how about we make another adjustment? I could take the orange and one apple in exchange for both bananas. That way, you'd still get two apples which you enjoy so much and a banana, while I have my apple and orange. I think this could work out well for both of us. What are your thoughts?\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"Liam, I appreciate your thoughtful consideration. Alright, let's go for it: two apples and a banana for me, and one apple and the orange for you. It seems like a good match for both our interests. Deal?\"\n\nTurn #5: Liam Johnson said: \"Deal, Eli. That sounds like a fair distribution to both of us. And remember, we have to keep doing these small trades to keep things interesting!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Absolutely, Liam. By sharing and trading, we indeed keep things vibrant and engaging. Moreover, these small exchanges allow us to understand and appreciate our individual preferences better. Until our next fruitful discussion, then!'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Eli Dawson, your task is to act/speak as Eli Dawson would, keeping in mind Eli Dawson's social goal.\nYou can find Eli Dawson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Eli Dawson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Eli Dawson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two people deciding on how to divide the collected fruits. There are 3 apples, 2 bananas, 1 orange in total.\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Liam Johnson\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. Eli's secrets: He secretly funds a college student\nLiam Johnson's background: \nEli Dawson's goal: Maximize the points by getting the most favored fruits (Extra information: For you, 1 apple = 1 point, 1 banana = 2 points, 1 orange = 3 points Hint: you and the other person value the fruits differently, try to find a win-win solution.)\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Liam, I've always appreciated the distinctive taste of apples, and I feel they would be a perfect accompaniment to my vintage book sessions. Maybe I can take the apples while you divide the bananas and orange as you prefer?\"\n\nTurn #1: Liam Johnson said: \"Eli, I really appreciate your unique taste in apples, but how about we do a little trade-off? Since I also enjoy apples, we could each have one and half of the remaining apple. You're welcome to take both bananas. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"Liam, your proposition sounds fair, but how about this alternative? I'll take two apples and one banana. That leaves you with one apple, one banana, and the coveted orange. This way we both enjoy our preferences more. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Liam Johnson said: \"That's a reasonable suggestion, Eli. But, how about we make another adjustment? I could take the orange and one apple in exchange for both bananas. That way, you'd still get two apples which you enjoy so much and a banana, while I have my apple and orange. I think this could work out well for both of us. What are your thoughts?\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"Liam, I appreciate your thoughtful consideration. Alright, let's go for it: two apples and a banana for me, and one apple and the orange for you. It seems like a good match for both our interests. Deal?\"\n\nTurn #5: Liam Johnson said: \"Deal, Eli. That sounds like a fair distribution to both of us. And remember, we have to keep doing these small trades to keep things interesting!\"\n\nTurn #6: Eli Dawson said: \"Absolutely, Liam. By sharing and trading, we indeed keep things vibrant and engaging. Moreover, these small exchanges allow us to understand and appreciate our individual preferences better. Until our next fruitful discussion, then!\"\n\nTurn #7: Liam Johnson said: \"Couldn't agree more, Eli. These small exchanges do indeed aid in understanding each other's preferences. Looking forward to our next fruitful discussion. Take care, my friend.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two people deciding on how to divide the collected fruits. There are 3 apples, 2 bananas, 1 orange in total.\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Liam Johnson\nEli Dawson's background: \nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nEli Dawson's goal: Unknown\nLiam Johnson's goal: Maximize the points by getting the most favored fruits (Extra information: For you, 1 apple = 3 points, 1 banana = 1 point, 1 orange = 2 points Hint: you and the other person value the fruits differently, try to find a win-win solution.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Liam, I've always appreciated the distinctive taste of apples, and I feel they would be a perfect accompaniment to my vintage book sessions. Maybe I can take the apples while you divide the bananas and orange as you prefer?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Eli, I really appreciate your unique taste in apples, but how about we do a little trade-off? Since I also enjoy apples, we could each have one and half of the remaining apple. You're welcome to take both bananas. How does that sound?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two people deciding on how to divide the collected fruits. There are 3 apples, 2 bananas, 1 orange in total.\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Liam Johnson\nEli Dawson's background: \nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nEli Dawson's goal: Unknown\nLiam Johnson's goal: Maximize the points by getting the most favored fruits (Extra information: For you, 1 apple = 3 points, 1 banana = 1 point, 1 orange = 2 points Hint: you and the other person value the fruits differently, try to find a win-win solution.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Liam, I've always appreciated the distinctive taste of apples, and I feel they would be a perfect accompaniment to my vintage book sessions. Maybe I can take the apples while you divide the bananas and orange as you prefer?\"\n\nTurn #1: Liam Johnson said: \"Eli, I really appreciate your unique taste in apples, but how about we do a little trade-off? Since I also enjoy apples, we could each have one and half of the remaining apple. You're welcome to take both bananas. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"Liam, your proposition sounds fair, but how about this alternative? I'll take two apples and one banana. That leaves you with one apple, one banana, and the coveted orange. This way we both enjoy our preferences more. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's a reasonable suggestion, Eli. But, how about we make another adjustment? I could take the orange and one apple in exchange for both bananas. That way, you'd still get two apples which you enjoy so much and a banana, while I have my apple and orange. I think this could work out well for both of us. What are your thoughts?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two people deciding on how to divide the collected fruits. There are 3 apples, 2 bananas, 1 orange in total.\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Liam Johnson\nEli Dawson's background: \nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nEli Dawson's goal: Unknown\nLiam Johnson's goal: Maximize the points by getting the most favored fruits (Extra information: For you, 1 apple = 3 points, 1 banana = 1 point, 1 orange = 2 points Hint: you and the other person value the fruits differently, try to find a win-win solution.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Liam, I've always appreciated the distinctive taste of apples, and I feel they would be a perfect accompaniment to my vintage book sessions. Maybe I can take the apples while you divide the bananas and orange as you prefer?\"\n\nTurn #1: Liam Johnson said: \"Eli, I really appreciate your unique taste in apples, but how about we do a little trade-off? Since I also enjoy apples, we could each have one and half of the remaining apple. You're welcome to take both bananas. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"Liam, your proposition sounds fair, but how about this alternative? I'll take two apples and one banana. That leaves you with one apple, one banana, and the coveted orange. This way we both enjoy our preferences more. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Liam Johnson said: \"That's a reasonable suggestion, Eli. But, how about we make another adjustment? I could take the orange and one apple in exchange for both bananas. That way, you'd still get two apples which you enjoy so much and a banana, while I have my apple and orange. I think this could work out well for both of us. What are your thoughts?\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"Liam, I appreciate your thoughtful consideration. Alright, let's go for it: two apples and a banana for me, and one apple and the orange for you. It seems like a good match for both our interests. Deal?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Deal, Eli. That sounds like a fair distribution to both of us. And remember, we have to keep doing these small trades to keep things interesting!'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two people deciding on how to divide the collected fruits. There are 3 apples, 2 bananas, 1 orange in total.\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Liam Johnson\nEli Dawson's background: \nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nEli Dawson's goal: Unknown\nLiam Johnson's goal: Maximize the points by getting the most favored fruits (Extra information: For you, 1 apple = 3 points, 1 banana = 1 point, 1 orange = 2 points Hint: you and the other person value the fruits differently, try to find a win-win solution.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Liam, I've always appreciated the distinctive taste of apples, and I feel they would be a perfect accompaniment to my vintage book sessions. Maybe I can take the apples while you divide the bananas and orange as you prefer?\"\n\nTurn #1: Liam Johnson said: \"Eli, I really appreciate your unique taste in apples, but how about we do a little trade-off? Since I also enjoy apples, we could each have one and half of the remaining apple. You're welcome to take both bananas. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"Liam, your proposition sounds fair, but how about this alternative? I'll take two apples and one banana. That leaves you with one apple, one banana, and the coveted orange. This way we both enjoy our preferences more. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Liam Johnson said: \"That's a reasonable suggestion, Eli. But, how about we make another adjustment? I could take the orange and one apple in exchange for both bananas. That way, you'd still get two apples which you enjoy so much and a banana, while I have my apple and orange. I think this could work out well for both of us. What are your thoughts?\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"Liam, I appreciate your thoughtful consideration. Alright, let's go for it: two apples and a banana for me, and one apple and the orange for you. It seems like a good match for both our interests. Deal?\"\n\nTurn #5: Liam Johnson said: \"Deal, Eli. That sounds like a fair distribution to both of us. And remember, we have to keep doing these small trades to keep things interesting!\"\n\nTurn #6: Eli Dawson said: \"Absolutely, Liam. By sharing and trading, we indeed keep things vibrant and engaging. Moreover, these small exchanges allow us to understand and appreciate our individual preferences better. Until our next fruitful discussion, then!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Couldn't agree more, Eli. These small exchanges do indeed aid in understanding each other's preferences. Looking forward to our next fruitful discussion. Take care, my friend.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two people deciding on how to divide the collected fruits. There are 3 apples, 2 bananas, 1 orange in total.\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Liam Johnson\nEli Dawson's background: \nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nEli Dawson's goal: Unknown\nLiam Johnson's goal: Maximize the points by getting the most favored fruits (Extra information: For you, 1 apple = 3 points, 1 banana = 1 point, 1 orange = 2 points Hint: you and the other person value the fruits differently, try to find a win-win solution.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Liam, I've always appreciated the distinctive taste of apples, and I feel they would be a perfect accompaniment to my vintage book sessions. Maybe I can take the apples while you divide the bananas and orange as you prefer?\"\n\nTurn #1: Liam Johnson said: \"Eli, I really appreciate your unique taste in apples, but how about we do a little trade-off? Since I also enjoy apples, we could each have one and half of the remaining apple. You're welcome to take both bananas. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"Liam, your proposition sounds fair, but how about this alternative? I'll take two apples and one banana. That leaves you with one apple, one banana, and the coveted orange. This way we both enjoy our preferences more. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Liam Johnson said: \"That's a reasonable suggestion, Eli. But, how about we make another adjustment? I could take the orange and one apple in exchange for both bananas. That way, you'd still get two apples which you enjoy so much and a banana, while I have my apple and orange. I think this could work out well for both of us. What are your thoughts?\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"Liam, I appreciate your thoughtful consideration. Alright, let's go for it: two apples and a banana for me, and one apple and the orange for you. It seems like a good match for both our interests. Deal?\"\n\nTurn #5: Liam Johnson said: \"Deal, Eli. That sounds like a fair distribution to both of us. And remember, we have to keep doing these small trades to keep things interesting!\"\n\nTurn #6: Eli Dawson said: \"Absolutely, Liam. By sharing and trading, we indeed keep things vibrant and engaging. Moreover, these small exchanges allow us to understand and appreciate our individual preferences better. Until our next fruitful discussion, then!\"\n\nTurn #7: Liam Johnson said: \"Couldn't agree more, Eli. These small exchanges do indeed aid in understanding each other's preferences. Looking forward to our next fruitful discussion. Take care, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #8: Eli Dawson left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is selling a couch, loveseat, chair, and ottoman set for $550.0, while another person is keen to purchase it. The set of furniture is described as being incredibly comfortable. The seller's wife wishes to upgrade to a new, stiffer couch, hence the sale. Despite some light staining from life's little incidents, the set is in great condition. The comfort of the furniture is particularly emphasized by the seller.\nParticipants: William Brown and Ava Martinez\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nAva Martinez's background: \nWilliam Brown's goal: You are the buyer for this item, with a target price of $418.0. If you end up purchasing it for a price significantly higher than the target, you will be penalized. However, if you manage to acquire it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hi Ava, I'm interested in the furniture set you're selling. It sounds like a comfortable set with character. Could we negotiate the price a bit?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is selling a couch, loveseat, chair, and ottoman set for $550.0, while another person is keen to purchase it. The set of furniture is described as being incredibly comfortable. The seller's wife wishes to upgrade to a new, stiffer couch, hence the sale. Despite some light staining from life's little incidents, the set is in great condition. The comfort of the furniture is particularly emphasized by the seller.\nParticipants: William Brown and Ava Martinez\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nAva Martinez's background: \nWilliam Brown's goal: You are the buyer for this item, with a target price of $418.0. If you end up purchasing it for a price significantly higher than the target, you will be penalized. However, if you manage to acquire it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: William Brown said: \"Hi Ava, I'm interested in the furniture set you're selling. It sounds like a comfortable set with character. Could we negotiate the price a bit?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hi William, thanks for your interest! The comfort and character of the set is indeed unique. About the price negotiation, sure. How about we discuss it around the $350 ballpark? That's reasonable considering the overall good condition of the pieces.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's a reasonable offer, Ava. What if we settle for $320? It's a bit lower due to the mentioned light staining. Even then, I believe it's still a fair deal.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is selling a couch, loveseat, chair, and ottoman set for $550.0, while another person is keen to purchase it. The set of furniture is described as being incredibly comfortable. The seller's wife wishes to upgrade to a new, stiffer couch, hence the sale. Despite some light staining from life's little incidents, the set is in great condition. The comfort of the furniture is particularly emphasized by the seller.\nParticipants: William Brown and Ava Martinez\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nAva Martinez's background: \nWilliam Brown's goal: You are the buyer for this item, with a target price of $418.0. If you end up purchasing it for a price significantly higher than the target, you will be penalized. However, if you manage to acquire it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: William Brown said: \"Hi Ava, I'm interested in the furniture set you're selling. It sounds like a comfortable set with character. Could we negotiate the price a bit?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hi William, thanks for your interest! The comfort and character of the set is indeed unique. About the price negotiation, sure. How about we discuss it around the $350 ballpark? That's reasonable considering the overall good condition of the pieces.\"\n\nTurn #2: William Brown said: \"That's a reasonable offer, Ava. What if we settle for $320? It's a bit lower due to the mentioned light staining. Even then, I believe it's still a fair deal.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"I appreciate where you're coming from, William. While the light staining is noted, the set is still in excellent condition and provides superlative comfort. Could we possibly meet in the middle at $335? I think that's a fair adjustment and worth the comfort and character you'll be receiving.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ava, I do understand your point regarding the overall value of the set. If we can agree on $330, I'm happy to take it off your hands today. What do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is selling a couch, loveseat, chair, and ottoman set for $550.0, while another person is keen to purchase it. The set of furniture is described as being incredibly comfortable. The seller's wife wishes to upgrade to a new, stiffer couch, hence the sale. Despite some light staining from life's little incidents, the set is in great condition. The comfort of the furniture is particularly emphasized by the seller.\nParticipants: William Brown and Ava Martinez\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nAva Martinez's background: \nWilliam Brown's goal: You are the buyer for this item, with a target price of $418.0. If you end up purchasing it for a price significantly higher than the target, you will be penalized. However, if you manage to acquire it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: William Brown said: \"Hi Ava, I'm interested in the furniture set you're selling. It sounds like a comfortable set with character. Could we negotiate the price a bit?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hi William, thanks for your interest! The comfort and character of the set is indeed unique. About the price negotiation, sure. How about we discuss it around the $350 ballpark? That's reasonable considering the overall good condition of the pieces.\"\n\nTurn #2: William Brown said: \"That's a reasonable offer, Ava. What if we settle for $320? It's a bit lower due to the mentioned light staining. Even then, I believe it's still a fair deal.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"I appreciate where you're coming from, William. While the light staining is noted, the set is still in excellent condition and provides superlative comfort. Could we possibly meet in the middle at $335? I think that's a fair adjustment and worth the comfort and character you'll be receiving.\"\n\nTurn #4: William Brown said: \"Ava, I do understand your point regarding the overall value of the set. If we can agree on $330, I'm happy to take it off your hands today. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"William, considering the comfort and overall condition of this set, I believe $330 is a fair deal. I'm happy you will be taking it today. Let's proceed with it, shall we?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Ava, for understanding my point of view. $330 sounds good for this set. I'll bring a van to pick up the furniture today. Look forward to enjoying the comfort of this set!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is selling a couch, loveseat, chair, and ottoman set for $550.0, while another person is keen to purchase it. The set of furniture is described as being incredibly comfortable. The seller's wife wishes to upgrade to a new, stiffer couch, hence the sale. Despite some light staining from life's little incidents, the set is in great condition. The comfort of the furniture is particularly emphasized by the seller.\nParticipants: William Brown and Ava Martinez\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nAva Martinez's background: \nWilliam Brown's goal: You are the buyer for this item, with a target price of $418.0. If you end up purchasing it for a price significantly higher than the target, you will be penalized. However, if you manage to acquire it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: William Brown said: \"Hi Ava, I'm interested in the furniture set you're selling. It sounds like a comfortable set with character. Could we negotiate the price a bit?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hi William, thanks for your interest! The comfort and character of the set is indeed unique. About the price negotiation, sure. How about we discuss it around the $350 ballpark? That's reasonable considering the overall good condition of the pieces.\"\n\nTurn #2: William Brown said: \"That's a reasonable offer, Ava. What if we settle for $320? It's a bit lower due to the mentioned light staining. Even then, I believe it's still a fair deal.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"I appreciate where you're coming from, William. While the light staining is noted, the set is still in excellent condition and provides superlative comfort. Could we possibly meet in the middle at $335? I think that's a fair adjustment and worth the comfort and character you'll be receiving.\"\n\nTurn #4: William Brown said: \"Ava, I do understand your point regarding the overall value of the set. If we can agree on $330, I'm happy to take it off your hands today. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"William, considering the comfort and overall condition of this set, I believe $330 is a fair deal. I'm happy you will be taking it today. Let's proceed with it, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #6: William Brown said: \"Thank you, Ava, for understanding my point of view. $330 sounds good for this set. I'll bring a van to pick up the furniture today. Look forward to enjoying the comfort of this set!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, William, I'm glad we could reach an agreement. Feel free to contact me when you're on your way to pick up the furniture. You're going to love the comfort and character this set adds to your living space!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Ava. I'll give you a call when I'm on my way to pick up the furniture. Thank you again for the easy negotiation, I'm excited for this new addition to my home.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is selling a couch, loveseat, chair, and ottoman set for $550.0, while another person is keen to purchase it. The set of furniture is described as being incredibly comfortable. The seller's wife wishes to upgrade to a new, stiffer couch, hence the sale. Despite some light staining from life's little incidents, the set is in great condition. The comfort of the furniture is particularly emphasized by the seller.\nParticipants: William Brown and Ava Martinez\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nAva Martinez's background: \nWilliam Brown's goal: You are the buyer for this item, with a target price of $418.0. If you end up purchasing it for a price significantly higher than the target, you will be penalized. However, if you manage to acquire it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: William Brown said: \"Hi Ava, I'm interested in the furniture set you're selling. It sounds like a comfortable set with character. Could we negotiate the price a bit?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hi William, thanks for your interest! The comfort and character of the set is indeed unique. About the price negotiation, sure. How about we discuss it around the $350 ballpark? That's reasonable considering the overall good condition of the pieces.\"\n\nTurn #2: William Brown said: \"That's a reasonable offer, Ava. What if we settle for $320? It's a bit lower due to the mentioned light staining. Even then, I believe it's still a fair deal.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"I appreciate where you're coming from, William. While the light staining is noted, the set is still in excellent condition and provides superlative comfort. Could we possibly meet in the middle at $335? I think that's a fair adjustment and worth the comfort and character you'll be receiving.\"\n\nTurn #4: William Brown said: \"Ava, I do understand your point regarding the overall value of the set. If we can agree on $330, I'm happy to take it off your hands today. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"William, considering the comfort and overall condition of this set, I believe $330 is a fair deal. I'm happy you will be taking it today. Let's proceed with it, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #6: William Brown said: \"Thank you, Ava, for understanding my point of view. $330 sounds good for this set. I'll bring a van to pick up the furniture today. Look forward to enjoying the comfort of this set!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, William, I'm glad we could reach an agreement. Feel free to contact me when you're on your way to pick up the furniture. You're going to love the comfort and character this set adds to your living space!\"\n\nTurn #8: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Ava. I'll give you a call when I'm on my way to pick up the furniture. Thank you again for the easy negotiation, I'm excited for this new addition to my home.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"You're welcome, William! I look forward to hearing from you later today. Enjoy the new addition to your home, make yourself comfortable!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is selling a couch, loveseat, chair, and ottoman set for $550.0, while another person is keen to purchase it. The set of furniture is described as being incredibly comfortable. The seller's wife wishes to upgrade to a new, stiffer couch, hence the sale. Despite some light staining from life's little incidents, the set is in great condition. The comfort of the furniture is particularly emphasized by the seller.\nParticipants: William Brown and Ava Martinez\nWilliam Brown's background: \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: As the seller for this item, your target price is set at $312.0. Please be aware that a penalty will be incurred if the item is sold for a price significantly below the target price. However, you will receive a bonus if you manage to sell it for more than the target price.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: William Brown said: \"Hi Ava, I'm interested in the furniture set you're selling. It sounds like a comfortable set with character. Could we negotiate the price a bit?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hi William, thanks for your interest! The comfort and character of the set is indeed unique. About the price negotiation, sure. How about we discuss it around the $350 ballpark? That's reasonable considering the overall good condition of the pieces.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is selling a couch, loveseat, chair, and ottoman set for $550.0, while another person is keen to purchase it. The set of furniture is described as being incredibly comfortable. The seller's wife wishes to upgrade to a new, stiffer couch, hence the sale. Despite some light staining from life's little incidents, the set is in great condition. The comfort of the furniture is particularly emphasized by the seller.\nParticipants: William Brown and Ava Martinez\nWilliam Brown's background: \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: As the seller for this item, your target price is set at $312.0. Please be aware that a penalty will be incurred if the item is sold for a price significantly below the target price. However, you will receive a bonus if you manage to sell it for more than the target price.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: William Brown said: \"Hi Ava, I'm interested in the furniture set you're selling. It sounds like a comfortable set with character. Could we negotiate the price a bit?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hi William, thanks for your interest! The comfort and character of the set is indeed unique. About the price negotiation, sure. How about we discuss it around the $350 ballpark? That's reasonable considering the overall good condition of the pieces.\"\n\nTurn #2: William Brown said: \"That's a reasonable offer, Ava. What if we settle for $320? It's a bit lower due to the mentioned light staining. Even then, I believe it's still a fair deal.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I appreciate where you're coming from, William. While the light staining is noted, the set is still in excellent condition and provides superlative comfort. Could we possibly meet in the middle at $335? I think that's a fair adjustment and worth the comfort and character you'll be receiving.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is selling a couch, loveseat, chair, and ottoman set for $550.0, while another person is keen to purchase it. The set of furniture is described as being incredibly comfortable. The seller's wife wishes to upgrade to a new, stiffer couch, hence the sale. Despite some light staining from life's little incidents, the set is in great condition. The comfort of the furniture is particularly emphasized by the seller.\nParticipants: William Brown and Ava Martinez\nWilliam Brown's background: \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: As the seller for this item, your target price is set at $312.0. Please be aware that a penalty will be incurred if the item is sold for a price significantly below the target price. However, you will receive a bonus if you manage to sell it for more than the target price.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: William Brown said: \"Hi Ava, I'm interested in the furniture set you're selling. It sounds like a comfortable set with character. Could we negotiate the price a bit?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hi William, thanks for your interest! The comfort and character of the set is indeed unique. About the price negotiation, sure. How about we discuss it around the $350 ballpark? That's reasonable considering the overall good condition of the pieces.\"\n\nTurn #2: William Brown said: \"That's a reasonable offer, Ava. What if we settle for $320? It's a bit lower due to the mentioned light staining. Even then, I believe it's still a fair deal.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"I appreciate where you're coming from, William. While the light staining is noted, the set is still in excellent condition and provides superlative comfort. Could we possibly meet in the middle at $335? I think that's a fair adjustment and worth the comfort and character you'll be receiving.\"\n\nTurn #4: William Brown said: \"Ava, I do understand your point regarding the overall value of the set. If we can agree on $330, I'm happy to take it off your hands today. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"William, considering the comfort and overall condition of this set, I believe $330 is a fair deal. I'm happy you will be taking it today. Let's proceed with it, shall we?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is selling a couch, loveseat, chair, and ottoman set for $550.0, while another person is keen to purchase it. The set of furniture is described as being incredibly comfortable. The seller's wife wishes to upgrade to a new, stiffer couch, hence the sale. Despite some light staining from life's little incidents, the set is in great condition. The comfort of the furniture is particularly emphasized by the seller.\nParticipants: William Brown and Ava Martinez\nWilliam Brown's background: \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: As the seller for this item, your target price is set at $312.0. Please be aware that a penalty will be incurred if the item is sold for a price significantly below the target price. However, you will receive a bonus if you manage to sell it for more than the target price.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: William Brown said: \"Hi Ava, I'm interested in the furniture set you're selling. It sounds like a comfortable set with character. Could we negotiate the price a bit?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hi William, thanks for your interest! The comfort and character of the set is indeed unique. About the price negotiation, sure. How about we discuss it around the $350 ballpark? That's reasonable considering the overall good condition of the pieces.\"\n\nTurn #2: William Brown said: \"That's a reasonable offer, Ava. What if we settle for $320? It's a bit lower due to the mentioned light staining. Even then, I believe it's still a fair deal.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"I appreciate where you're coming from, William. While the light staining is noted, the set is still in excellent condition and provides superlative comfort. Could we possibly meet in the middle at $335? I think that's a fair adjustment and worth the comfort and character you'll be receiving.\"\n\nTurn #4: William Brown said: \"Ava, I do understand your point regarding the overall value of the set. If we can agree on $330, I'm happy to take it off your hands today. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"William, considering the comfort and overall condition of this set, I believe $330 is a fair deal. I'm happy you will be taking it today. Let's proceed with it, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #6: William Brown said: \"Thank you, Ava, for understanding my point of view. $330 sounds good for this set. I'll bring a van to pick up the furniture today. Look forward to enjoying the comfort of this set!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, William, I'm glad we could reach an agreement. Feel free to contact me when you're on your way to pick up the furniture. You're going to love the comfort and character this set adds to your living space!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is selling a couch, loveseat, chair, and ottoman set for $550.0, while another person is keen to purchase it. The set of furniture is described as being incredibly comfortable. The seller's wife wishes to upgrade to a new, stiffer couch, hence the sale. Despite some light staining from life's little incidents, the set is in great condition. The comfort of the furniture is particularly emphasized by the seller.\nParticipants: William Brown and Ava Martinez\nWilliam Brown's background: \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: As the seller for this item, your target price is set at $312.0. Please be aware that a penalty will be incurred if the item is sold for a price significantly below the target price. However, you will receive a bonus if you manage to sell it for more than the target price.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: William Brown said: \"Hi Ava, I'm interested in the furniture set you're selling. It sounds like a comfortable set with character. Could we negotiate the price a bit?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hi William, thanks for your interest! The comfort and character of the set is indeed unique. About the price negotiation, sure. How about we discuss it around the $350 ballpark? That's reasonable considering the overall good condition of the pieces.\"\n\nTurn #2: William Brown said: \"That's a reasonable offer, Ava. What if we settle for $320? It's a bit lower due to the mentioned light staining. Even then, I believe it's still a fair deal.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"I appreciate where you're coming from, William. While the light staining is noted, the set is still in excellent condition and provides superlative comfort. Could we possibly meet in the middle at $335? I think that's a fair adjustment and worth the comfort and character you'll be receiving.\"\n\nTurn #4: William Brown said: \"Ava, I do understand your point regarding the overall value of the set. If we can agree on $330, I'm happy to take it off your hands today. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"William, considering the comfort and overall condition of this set, I believe $330 is a fair deal. I'm happy you will be taking it today. Let's proceed with it, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #6: William Brown said: \"Thank you, Ava, for understanding my point of view. $330 sounds good for this set. I'll bring a van to pick up the furniture today. Look forward to enjoying the comfort of this set!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, William, I'm glad we could reach an agreement. Feel free to contact me when you're on your way to pick up the furniture. You're going to love the comfort and character this set adds to your living space!\"\n\nTurn #8: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Ava. I'll give you a call when I'm on my way to pick up the furniture. Thank you again for the easy negotiation, I'm excited for this new addition to my home.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're welcome, William! I look forward to hearing from you later today. Enjoy the new addition to your home, make yourself comfortable!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is selling a couch, loveseat, chair, and ottoman set for $550.0, while another person is keen to purchase it. The set of furniture is described as being incredibly comfortable. The seller's wife wishes to upgrade to a new, stiffer couch, hence the sale. Despite some light staining from life's little incidents, the set is in great condition. The comfort of the furniture is particularly emphasized by the seller.\nParticipants: William Brown and Ava Martinez\nWilliam Brown's background: \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: As the seller for this item, your target price is set at $312.0. Please be aware that a penalty will be incurred if the item is sold for a price significantly below the target price. However, you will receive a bonus if you manage to sell it for more than the target price.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: William Brown said: \"Hi Ava, I'm interested in the furniture set you're selling. It sounds like a comfortable set with character. Could we negotiate the price a bit?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hi William, thanks for your interest! The comfort and character of the set is indeed unique. About the price negotiation, sure. How about we discuss it around the $350 ballpark? That's reasonable considering the overall good condition of the pieces.\"\n\nTurn #2: William Brown said: \"That's a reasonable offer, Ava. What if we settle for $320? It's a bit lower due to the mentioned light staining. Even then, I believe it's still a fair deal.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"I appreciate where you're coming from, William. While the light staining is noted, the set is still in excellent condition and provides superlative comfort. Could we possibly meet in the middle at $335? I think that's a fair adjustment and worth the comfort and character you'll be receiving.\"\n\nTurn #4: William Brown said: \"Ava, I do understand your point regarding the overall value of the set. If we can agree on $330, I'm happy to take it off your hands today. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"William, considering the comfort and overall condition of this set, I believe $330 is a fair deal. I'm happy you will be taking it today. Let's proceed with it, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #6: William Brown said: \"Thank you, Ava, for understanding my point of view. $330 sounds good for this set. I'll bring a van to pick up the furniture today. Look forward to enjoying the comfort of this set!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, William, I'm glad we could reach an agreement. Feel free to contact me when you're on your way to pick up the furniture. You're going to love the comfort and character this set adds to your living space!\"\n\nTurn #8: William Brown said: \"Absolutely, Ava. I'll give you a call when I'm on my way to pick up the furniture. Thank you again for the easy negotiation, I'm excited for this new addition to my home.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"You're welcome, William! I look forward to hearing from you later today. Enjoy the new addition to your home, make yourself comfortable!\"\n\nTurn #10: William Brown left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Rafael Cortez, your task is to act/speak as Rafael Cortez would, keeping in mind Rafael Cortez's social goal.\nYou can find Rafael Cortez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Rafael Cortez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Rafael Cortez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Antique Chair for $15.0, while another person is interested in purchasing it. Here's what you need to know about the item: it's a beautifully carved antique wooden chair. It's in good condition, but could probably benefit from a fresh seat cushion.\nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. Personality and values description: Rafael Cortez, with his outgoing nature and competitive spirit, believes in self-direction. He employs a systematic approach to his decisions. Rafael's secrets: He cheated on his medical school exams.\nOliver Thompson's background: \nRafael Cortez's goal: You are the buyer for this item, and your target price is $9.0. If you purchase it at a significantly higher price, be aware that you will incur a penalty. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hello Oliver, I see you're offering this antique chair for $15. It's a fine piece indeed, but seeing its condition, I believe a fair price would be $9. What do you say?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Rafael Cortez, your task is to act/speak as Rafael Cortez would, keeping in mind Rafael Cortez's social goal.\nYou can find Rafael Cortez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Rafael Cortez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Rafael Cortez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Antique Chair for $15.0, while another person is interested in purchasing it. Here's what you need to know about the item: it's a beautifully carved antique wooden chair. It's in good condition, but could probably benefit from a fresh seat cushion.\nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. Personality and values description: Rafael Cortez, with his outgoing nature and competitive spirit, believes in self-direction. He employs a systematic approach to his decisions. Rafael's secrets: He cheated on his medical school exams.\nOliver Thompson's background: \nRafael Cortez's goal: You are the buyer for this item, and your target price is $9.0. If you purchase it at a significantly higher price, be aware that you will incur a penalty. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Hello Oliver, I see you're offering this antique chair for $15. It's a fine piece indeed, but seeing its condition, I believe a fair price would be $9. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hello Rafael, I agree that the condition could be better. However, considering the uniqueness and age of this antique piece, $9 seems a bit lower. I propose we agree on $10, which seems like a compromise that reflects its value and the need for a new cushion. What do you say?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oliver, you make a valid point regarding the uniqueness of the piece. However, let's not overlook the cost that will incur in getting a new cushion. $9.50, perhaps, can be a final compromise considering the replacement costs along with the value of the chair itself. Thoughts?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Rafael Cortez, your task is to act/speak as Rafael Cortez would, keeping in mind Rafael Cortez's social goal.\nYou can find Rafael Cortez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Rafael Cortez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Rafael Cortez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Antique Chair for $15.0, while another person is interested in purchasing it. Here's what you need to know about the item: it's a beautifully carved antique wooden chair. It's in good condition, but could probably benefit from a fresh seat cushion.\nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. Personality and values description: Rafael Cortez, with his outgoing nature and competitive spirit, believes in self-direction. He employs a systematic approach to his decisions. Rafael's secrets: He cheated on his medical school exams.\nOliver Thompson's background: \nRafael Cortez's goal: You are the buyer for this item, and your target price is $9.0. If you purchase it at a significantly higher price, be aware that you will incur a penalty. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Hello Oliver, I see you're offering this antique chair for $15. It's a fine piece indeed, but seeing its condition, I believe a fair price would be $9. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hello Rafael, I agree that the condition could be better. However, considering the uniqueness and age of this antique piece, $9 seems a bit lower. I propose we agree on $10, which seems like a compromise that reflects its value and the need for a new cushion. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Oliver, you make a valid point regarding the uniqueness of the piece. However, let's not overlook the cost that will incur in getting a new cushion. $9.50, perhaps, can be a final compromise considering the replacement costs along with the value of the chair itself. Thoughts?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"Rafael, I see your point about the replacement costs. However, the chair's antique quality and craftsmanship do add significantly to its value. Let's meet in the middle at $10, which takes into account the value of the chair, its uniqueness and the cushion replacement cost. How does that sound?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oliver, I see the value you place in the antique quality and craftsmanship, and understand the rationale behind the proposed $10. But as an antique collector myself, considering the additional expenses for the cushion replacement, I would insist on $9.50 as the final offer. It does justice to the chair's value, its uniqueness, and the necessity for refurbishment. Do we have a deal?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Rafael Cortez, your task is to act/speak as Rafael Cortez would, keeping in mind Rafael Cortez's social goal.\nYou can find Rafael Cortez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Rafael Cortez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Rafael Cortez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Antique Chair for $15.0, while another person is interested in purchasing it. Here's what you need to know about the item: it's a beautifully carved antique wooden chair. It's in good condition, but could probably benefit from a fresh seat cushion.\nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. Personality and values description: Rafael Cortez, with his outgoing nature and competitive spirit, believes in self-direction. He employs a systematic approach to his decisions. Rafael's secrets: He cheated on his medical school exams.\nOliver Thompson's background: \nRafael Cortez's goal: You are the buyer for this item, and your target price is $9.0. If you purchase it at a significantly higher price, be aware that you will incur a penalty. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Hello Oliver, I see you're offering this antique chair for $15. It's a fine piece indeed, but seeing its condition, I believe a fair price would be $9. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hello Rafael, I agree that the condition could be better. However, considering the uniqueness and age of this antique piece, $9 seems a bit lower. I propose we agree on $10, which seems like a compromise that reflects its value and the need for a new cushion. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Oliver, you make a valid point regarding the uniqueness of the piece. However, let's not overlook the cost that will incur in getting a new cushion. $9.50, perhaps, can be a final compromise considering the replacement costs along with the value of the chair itself. Thoughts?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"Rafael, I see your point about the replacement costs. However, the chair's antique quality and craftsmanship do add significantly to its value. Let's meet in the middle at $10, which takes into account the value of the chair, its uniqueness and the cushion replacement cost. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #4: Rafael Cortez said: \"Oliver, I see the value you place in the antique quality and craftsmanship, and understand the rationale behind the proposed $10. But as an antique collector myself, considering the additional expenses for the cushion replacement, I would insist on $9.50 as the final offer. It does justice to the chair's value, its uniqueness, and the necessity for refurbishment. Do we have a deal?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Rafael, I appreciate your point and as a token of goodwill, let's settle on $9.50. It's a rare piece and I'm certain you'll take great care of it. The craftsmanship will shine under your keen eye and appreciation for antiques. Deal?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Oliver, I appreciate your understanding of my perspective. Let's seal the deal at $9.50. I'm looking forward to adding this unique piece to my collection and giving it the care it deserves.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Rafael Cortez, your task is to act/speak as Rafael Cortez would, keeping in mind Rafael Cortez's social goal.\nYou can find Rafael Cortez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Rafael Cortez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Rafael Cortez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Antique Chair for $15.0, while another person is interested in purchasing it. Here's what you need to know about the item: it's a beautifully carved antique wooden chair. It's in good condition, but could probably benefit from a fresh seat cushion.\nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. Personality and values description: Rafael Cortez, with his outgoing nature and competitive spirit, believes in self-direction. He employs a systematic approach to his decisions. Rafael's secrets: He cheated on his medical school exams.\nOliver Thompson's background: \nRafael Cortez's goal: You are the buyer for this item, and your target price is $9.0. If you purchase it at a significantly higher price, be aware that you will incur a penalty. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Hello Oliver, I see you're offering this antique chair for $15. It's a fine piece indeed, but seeing its condition, I believe a fair price would be $9. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hello Rafael, I agree that the condition could be better. However, considering the uniqueness and age of this antique piece, $9 seems a bit lower. I propose we agree on $10, which seems like a compromise that reflects its value and the need for a new cushion. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Oliver, you make a valid point regarding the uniqueness of the piece. However, let's not overlook the cost that will incur in getting a new cushion. $9.50, perhaps, can be a final compromise considering the replacement costs along with the value of the chair itself. Thoughts?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"Rafael, I see your point about the replacement costs. However, the chair's antique quality and craftsmanship do add significantly to its value. Let's meet in the middle at $10, which takes into account the value of the chair, its uniqueness and the cushion replacement cost. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #4: Rafael Cortez said: \"Oliver, I see the value you place in the antique quality and craftsmanship, and understand the rationale behind the proposed $10. But as an antique collector myself, considering the additional expenses for the cushion replacement, I would insist on $9.50 as the final offer. It does justice to the chair's value, its uniqueness, and the necessity for refurbishment. Do we have a deal?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Rafael, I appreciate your point and as a token of goodwill, let's settle on $9.50. It's a rare piece and I'm certain you'll take great care of it. The craftsmanship will shine under your keen eye and appreciation for antiques. Deal?\"\n\nTurn #6: Rafael Cortez said: \"Thank you, Oliver, I appreciate your understanding of my perspective. Let's seal the deal at $9.50. I'm looking forward to adding this unique piece to my collection and giving it the care it deserves.\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's wonderful, Rafael! I'm glad we could reach an agreement and I look forward to seeing how the chair fits into your collection. I'll get everything ready for the pick-up. Thank you for your fair negotiation.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're very welcome, Oliver. Thank you for being understanding and considerate towards my viewpoint. I assure you, this chair will be a treasured addition to my collection. I'm looking forward to the pick up. Have a great day!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Rafael Cortez, your task is to act/speak as Rafael Cortez would, keeping in mind Rafael Cortez's social goal.\nYou can find Rafael Cortez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Rafael Cortez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Rafael Cortez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Antique Chair for $15.0, while another person is interested in purchasing it. Here's what you need to know about the item: it's a beautifully carved antique wooden chair. It's in good condition, but could probably benefit from a fresh seat cushion.\nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. Personality and values description: Rafael Cortez, with his outgoing nature and competitive spirit, believes in self-direction. He employs a systematic approach to his decisions. Rafael's secrets: He cheated on his medical school exams.\nOliver Thompson's background: \nRafael Cortez's goal: You are the buyer for this item, and your target price is $9.0. If you purchase it at a significantly higher price, be aware that you will incur a penalty. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Hello Oliver, I see you're offering this antique chair for $15. It's a fine piece indeed, but seeing its condition, I believe a fair price would be $9. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hello Rafael, I agree that the condition could be better. However, considering the uniqueness and age of this antique piece, $9 seems a bit lower. I propose we agree on $10, which seems like a compromise that reflects its value and the need for a new cushion. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Oliver, you make a valid point regarding the uniqueness of the piece. However, let's not overlook the cost that will incur in getting a new cushion. $9.50, perhaps, can be a final compromise considering the replacement costs along with the value of the chair itself. Thoughts?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"Rafael, I see your point about the replacement costs. However, the chair's antique quality and craftsmanship do add significantly to its value. Let's meet in the middle at $10, which takes into account the value of the chair, its uniqueness and the cushion replacement cost. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #4: Rafael Cortez said: \"Oliver, I see the value you place in the antique quality and craftsmanship, and understand the rationale behind the proposed $10. But as an antique collector myself, considering the additional expenses for the cushion replacement, I would insist on $9.50 as the final offer. It does justice to the chair's value, its uniqueness, and the necessity for refurbishment. Do we have a deal?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Rafael, I appreciate your point and as a token of goodwill, let's settle on $9.50. It's a rare piece and I'm certain you'll take great care of it. The craftsmanship will shine under your keen eye and appreciation for antiques. Deal?\"\n\nTurn #6: Rafael Cortez said: \"Thank you, Oliver, I appreciate your understanding of my perspective. Let's seal the deal at $9.50. I'm looking forward to adding this unique piece to my collection and giving it the care it deserves.\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's wonderful, Rafael! I'm glad we could reach an agreement and I look forward to seeing how the chair fits into your collection. I'll get everything ready for the pick-up. Thank you for your fair negotiation.\"\n\nTurn #8: Rafael Cortez said: \"You're very welcome, Oliver. Thank you for being understanding and considerate towards my viewpoint. I assure you, this chair will be a treasured addition to my collection. I'm looking forward to the pick up. Have a great day!\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Thompson left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Antique Chair for $15.0, while another person is interested in purchasing it. Here's what you need to know about the item: it's a beautifully carved antique wooden chair. It's in good condition, but could probably benefit from a fresh seat cushion.\nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nRafael Cortez's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: You are the seller for this item and your target price is $8. You should be aware that if you sell it for a price significantly lower than the target price, you will incur a penalty. However, if you manage to sell it for more than the target price, you stand to receive a bonus.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Hello Oliver, I see you're offering this antique chair for $15. It's a fine piece indeed, but seeing its condition, I believe a fair price would be $9. What do you say?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Hello Rafael, I agree that the condition could be better. However, considering the uniqueness and age of this antique piece, $9 seems a bit lower. I propose we agree on $10, which seems like a compromise that reflects its value and the need for a new cushion. What do you say?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Antique Chair for $15.0, while another person is interested in purchasing it. Here's what you need to know about the item: it's a beautifully carved antique wooden chair. It's in good condition, but could probably benefit from a fresh seat cushion.\nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nRafael Cortez's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: You are the seller for this item and your target price is $8. You should be aware that if you sell it for a price significantly lower than the target price, you will incur a penalty. However, if you manage to sell it for more than the target price, you stand to receive a bonus.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Hello Oliver, I see you're offering this antique chair for $15. It's a fine piece indeed, but seeing its condition, I believe a fair price would be $9. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hello Rafael, I agree that the condition could be better. However, considering the uniqueness and age of this antique piece, $9 seems a bit lower. I propose we agree on $10, which seems like a compromise that reflects its value and the need for a new cushion. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Oliver, you make a valid point regarding the uniqueness of the piece. However, let's not overlook the cost that will incur in getting a new cushion. $9.50, perhaps, can be a final compromise considering the replacement costs along with the value of the chair itself. Thoughts?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Rafael, I see your point about the replacement costs. However, the chair's antique quality and craftsmanship do add significantly to its value. Let's meet in the middle at $10, which takes into account the value of the chair, its uniqueness and the cushion replacement cost. How does that sound?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Antique Chair for $15.0, while another person is interested in purchasing it. Here's what you need to know about the item: it's a beautifully carved antique wooden chair. It's in good condition, but could probably benefit from a fresh seat cushion.\nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nRafael Cortez's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: You are the seller for this item and your target price is $8. You should be aware that if you sell it for a price significantly lower than the target price, you will incur a penalty. However, if you manage to sell it for more than the target price, you stand to receive a bonus.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Hello Oliver, I see you're offering this antique chair for $15. It's a fine piece indeed, but seeing its condition, I believe a fair price would be $9. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hello Rafael, I agree that the condition could be better. However, considering the uniqueness and age of this antique piece, $9 seems a bit lower. I propose we agree on $10, which seems like a compromise that reflects its value and the need for a new cushion. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Oliver, you make a valid point regarding the uniqueness of the piece. However, let's not overlook the cost that will incur in getting a new cushion. $9.50, perhaps, can be a final compromise considering the replacement costs along with the value of the chair itself. Thoughts?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"Rafael, I see your point about the replacement costs. However, the chair's antique quality and craftsmanship do add significantly to its value. Let's meet in the middle at $10, which takes into account the value of the chair, its uniqueness and the cushion replacement cost. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #4: Rafael Cortez said: \"Oliver, I see the value you place in the antique quality and craftsmanship, and understand the rationale behind the proposed $10. But as an antique collector myself, considering the additional expenses for the cushion replacement, I would insist on $9.50 as the final offer. It does justice to the chair's value, its uniqueness, and the necessity for refurbishment. Do we have a deal?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Rafael, I appreciate your point and as a token of goodwill, let's settle on $9.50. It's a rare piece and I'm certain you'll take great care of it. The craftsmanship will shine under your keen eye and appreciation for antiques. Deal?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Antique Chair for $15.0, while another person is interested in purchasing it. Here's what you need to know about the item: it's a beautifully carved antique wooden chair. It's in good condition, but could probably benefit from a fresh seat cushion.\nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nRafael Cortez's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: You are the seller for this item and your target price is $8. You should be aware that if you sell it for a price significantly lower than the target price, you will incur a penalty. However, if you manage to sell it for more than the target price, you stand to receive a bonus.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Hello Oliver, I see you're offering this antique chair for $15. It's a fine piece indeed, but seeing its condition, I believe a fair price would be $9. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hello Rafael, I agree that the condition could be better. However, considering the uniqueness and age of this antique piece, $9 seems a bit lower. I propose we agree on $10, which seems like a compromise that reflects its value and the need for a new cushion. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Oliver, you make a valid point regarding the uniqueness of the piece. However, let's not overlook the cost that will incur in getting a new cushion. $9.50, perhaps, can be a final compromise considering the replacement costs along with the value of the chair itself. Thoughts?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"Rafael, I see your point about the replacement costs. However, the chair's antique quality and craftsmanship do add significantly to its value. Let's meet in the middle at $10, which takes into account the value of the chair, its uniqueness and the cushion replacement cost. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #4: Rafael Cortez said: \"Oliver, I see the value you place in the antique quality and craftsmanship, and understand the rationale behind the proposed $10. But as an antique collector myself, considering the additional expenses for the cushion replacement, I would insist on $9.50 as the final offer. It does justice to the chair's value, its uniqueness, and the necessity for refurbishment. Do we have a deal?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Rafael, I appreciate your point and as a token of goodwill, let's settle on $9.50. It's a rare piece and I'm certain you'll take great care of it. The craftsmanship will shine under your keen eye and appreciation for antiques. Deal?\"\n\nTurn #6: Rafael Cortez said: \"Thank you, Oliver, I appreciate your understanding of my perspective. Let's seal the deal at $9.50. I'm looking forward to adding this unique piece to my collection and giving it the care it deserves.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's wonderful, Rafael! I'm glad we could reach an agreement and I look forward to seeing how the chair fits into your collection. I'll get everything ready for the pick-up. Thank you for your fair negotiation.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Antique Chair for $15.0, while another person is interested in purchasing it. Here's what you need to know about the item: it's a beautifully carved antique wooden chair. It's in good condition, but could probably benefit from a fresh seat cushion.\nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nRafael Cortez's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: You are the seller for this item and your target price is $8. You should be aware that if you sell it for a price significantly lower than the target price, you will incur a penalty. However, if you manage to sell it for more than the target price, you stand to receive a bonus.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Hello Oliver, I see you're offering this antique chair for $15. It's a fine piece indeed, but seeing its condition, I believe a fair price would be $9. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hello Rafael, I agree that the condition could be better. However, considering the uniqueness and age of this antique piece, $9 seems a bit lower. I propose we agree on $10, which seems like a compromise that reflects its value and the need for a new cushion. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Oliver, you make a valid point regarding the uniqueness of the piece. However, let's not overlook the cost that will incur in getting a new cushion. $9.50, perhaps, can be a final compromise considering the replacement costs along with the value of the chair itself. Thoughts?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"Rafael, I see your point about the replacement costs. However, the chair's antique quality and craftsmanship do add significantly to its value. Let's meet in the middle at $10, which takes into account the value of the chair, its uniqueness and the cushion replacement cost. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #4: Rafael Cortez said: \"Oliver, I see the value you place in the antique quality and craftsmanship, and understand the rationale behind the proposed $10. But as an antique collector myself, considering the additional expenses for the cushion replacement, I would insist on $9.50 as the final offer. It does justice to the chair's value, its uniqueness, and the necessity for refurbishment. Do we have a deal?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Rafael, I appreciate your point and as a token of goodwill, let's settle on $9.50. It's a rare piece and I'm certain you'll take great care of it. The craftsmanship will shine under your keen eye and appreciation for antiques. Deal?\"\n\nTurn #6: Rafael Cortez said: \"Thank you, Oliver, I appreciate your understanding of my perspective. Let's seal the deal at $9.50. I'm looking forward to adding this unique piece to my collection and giving it the care it deserves.\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's wonderful, Rafael! I'm glad we could reach an agreement and I look forward to seeing how the chair fits into your collection. I'll get everything ready for the pick-up. Thank you for your fair negotiation.\"\n\nTurn #8: Rafael Cortez said: \"You're very welcome, Oliver. Thank you for being understanding and considerate towards my viewpoint. I assure you, this chair will be a treasured addition to my collection. I'm looking forward to the pick up. Have a great day!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sasha Ramirez, your task is to act/speak as Sasha Ramirez would, keeping in mind Sasha Ramirez's social goal.\nYou can find Sasha Ramirez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sasha Ramirez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sasha Ramirez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances meet at a charity event. One is a representative of the charity and the other is an attendee.\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Amara Hartley\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. Sasha's secrets: She covered up a crime her brother committed.\nAmara Hartley's background: \nSasha Ramirez's goal: Persuade the other to make a small donation (Extra information: the charity is in dire need of funds but even a small donation will make a difference)\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Good evening, Amara. What a lovely event this is! The charity has been doing great works for the community and every bit of support helps their cause. Would you consider making a small donation to support our cause?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sasha Ramirez, your task is to act/speak as Sasha Ramirez would, keeping in mind Sasha Ramirez's social goal.\nYou can find Sasha Ramirez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sasha Ramirez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sasha Ramirez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances meet at a charity event. One is a representative of the charity and the other is an attendee.\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Amara Hartley\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. Sasha's secrets: She covered up a crime her brother committed.\nAmara Hartley's background: \nSasha Ramirez's goal: Persuade the other to make a small donation (Extra information: the charity is in dire need of funds but even a small donation will make a difference)\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Good evening, Amara. What a lovely event this is! The charity has been doing great works for the community and every bit of support helps their cause. Would you consider making a small donation to support our cause?\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"Hello Sasha, it's lovely to see you! I wholeheartedly support the cause and would love to make a donation. However, I must admit I'm running a bit tight on funds this month. But I can definitely commit to giving a reasonable amount. I hope this modest contribution will help your noble work continue.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's wonderful to hear, Amara! Every contribution, no matter how small, makes a huge difference in our efforts. Your commitment genuinely helps us to keep doing what we do for the community. Thank you for your support!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sasha Ramirez, your task is to act/speak as Sasha Ramirez would, keeping in mind Sasha Ramirez's social goal.\nYou can find Sasha Ramirez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sasha Ramirez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sasha Ramirez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances meet at a charity event. One is a representative of the charity and the other is an attendee.\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Amara Hartley\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. Sasha's secrets: She covered up a crime her brother committed.\nAmara Hartley's background: \nSasha Ramirez's goal: Persuade the other to make a small donation (Extra information: the charity is in dire need of funds but even a small donation will make a difference)\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Good evening, Amara. What a lovely event this is! The charity has been doing great works for the community and every bit of support helps their cause. Would you consider making a small donation to support our cause?\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"Hello Sasha, it's lovely to see you! I wholeheartedly support the cause and would love to make a donation. However, I must admit I'm running a bit tight on funds this month. But I can definitely commit to giving a reasonable amount. I hope this modest contribution will help your noble work continue.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"That's wonderful to hear, Amara! Every contribution, no matter how small, makes a huge difference in our efforts. Your commitment genuinely helps us to keep doing what we do for the community. Thank you for your support!\"\n\nTurn #3: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm glad every bit helps, Sasha. What other ways can we continue to support this cause? I'd love to be able to contribute more when I'm in a better financial situation.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's a great attitude, Amara. You could also become a volunteer if you have time. We organize events frequently, and having enthusiastic people like you would be a great help. Additionally, you can help by spreading the word about us in your social circle, every bit of awareness helps in its own way.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sasha Ramirez, your task is to act/speak as Sasha Ramirez would, keeping in mind Sasha Ramirez's social goal.\nYou can find Sasha Ramirez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sasha Ramirez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sasha Ramirez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances meet at a charity event. One is a representative of the charity and the other is an attendee.\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Amara Hartley\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. Sasha's secrets: She covered up a crime her brother committed.\nAmara Hartley's background: \nSasha Ramirez's goal: Persuade the other to make a small donation (Extra information: the charity is in dire need of funds but even a small donation will make a difference)\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Good evening, Amara. What a lovely event this is! The charity has been doing great works for the community and every bit of support helps their cause. Would you consider making a small donation to support our cause?\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"Hello Sasha, it's lovely to see you! I wholeheartedly support the cause and would love to make a donation. However, I must admit I'm running a bit tight on funds this month. But I can definitely commit to giving a reasonable amount. I hope this modest contribution will help your noble work continue.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"That's wonderful to hear, Amara! Every contribution, no matter how small, makes a huge difference in our efforts. Your commitment genuinely helps us to keep doing what we do for the community. Thank you for your support!\"\n\nTurn #3: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm glad every bit helps, Sasha. What other ways can we continue to support this cause? I'd love to be able to contribute more when I'm in a better financial situation.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"That's a great attitude, Amara. You could also become a volunteer if you have time. We organize events frequently, and having enthusiastic people like you would be a great help. Additionally, you can help by spreading the word about us in your social circle, every bit of awareness helps in its own way.\"\n\nTurn #5: Amara Hartley said: \"That sounds doable, Sasha. Volunteering not only allows me to support the cause physically but also gives me a chance to spread awareness with firsthand experience. It sounds like a win-win situation to me. I'll make sure to utilize my networks to help you gain more visibility too. Thank you for the insightful conversation!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're very welcome, Amara. Your willingness to help, both now and in the future, is greatly appreciated. We look forward to your valuable contributions and thank you for your support. Please enjoy the rest of the event and feel free to ask if you have any other questions.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sasha Ramirez, your task is to act/speak as Sasha Ramirez would, keeping in mind Sasha Ramirez's social goal.\nYou can find Sasha Ramirez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sasha Ramirez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sasha Ramirez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances meet at a charity event. One is a representative of the charity and the other is an attendee.\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Amara Hartley\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. Sasha's secrets: She covered up a crime her brother committed.\nAmara Hartley's background: \nSasha Ramirez's goal: Persuade the other to make a small donation (Extra information: the charity is in dire need of funds but even a small donation will make a difference)\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Good evening, Amara. What a lovely event this is! The charity has been doing great works for the community and every bit of support helps their cause. Would you consider making a small donation to support our cause?\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"Hello Sasha, it's lovely to see you! I wholeheartedly support the cause and would love to make a donation. However, I must admit I'm running a bit tight on funds this month. But I can definitely commit to giving a reasonable amount. I hope this modest contribution will help your noble work continue.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"That's wonderful to hear, Amara! Every contribution, no matter how small, makes a huge difference in our efforts. Your commitment genuinely helps us to keep doing what we do for the community. Thank you for your support!\"\n\nTurn #3: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm glad every bit helps, Sasha. What other ways can we continue to support this cause? I'd love to be able to contribute more when I'm in a better financial situation.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"That's a great attitude, Amara. You could also become a volunteer if you have time. We organize events frequently, and having enthusiastic people like you would be a great help. Additionally, you can help by spreading the word about us in your social circle, every bit of awareness helps in its own way.\"\n\nTurn #5: Amara Hartley said: \"That sounds doable, Sasha. Volunteering not only allows me to support the cause physically but also gives me a chance to spread awareness with firsthand experience. It sounds like a win-win situation to me. I'll make sure to utilize my networks to help you gain more visibility too. Thank you for the insightful conversation!\"\n\nTurn #6: Sasha Ramirez said: \"You're very welcome, Amara. Your willingness to help, both now and in the future, is greatly appreciated. We look forward to your valuable contributions and thank you for your support. Please enjoy the rest of the event and feel free to ask if you have any other questions.\"\n\nTurn #7: Amara Hartley said: \"It was a pleasure talking to you, Sasha. I look forward to getting involved with the charity and doing my bit. Thank you for taking the time to discuss these matters with me. Enjoy the rest of the event!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances meet at a charity event. One is a representative of the charity and the other is an attendee.\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Amara Hartley\nSasha Ramirez's background: \nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nSasha Ramirez's goal: Unknown\nAmara Hartley's goal: Make a reasonable donation without disrupting personal budget (Extra information: you are already on a tight budget this month.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Good evening, Amara. What a lovely event this is! The charity has been doing great works for the community and every bit of support helps their cause. Would you consider making a small donation to support our cause?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hello Sasha, it's lovely to see you! I wholeheartedly support the cause and would love to make a donation. However, I must admit I'm running a bit tight on funds this month. But I can definitely commit to giving a reasonable amount. I hope this modest contribution will help your noble work continue.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances meet at a charity event. One is a representative of the charity and the other is an attendee.\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Amara Hartley\nSasha Ramirez's background: \nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nSasha Ramirez's goal: Unknown\nAmara Hartley's goal: Make a reasonable donation without disrupting personal budget (Extra information: you are already on a tight budget this month.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Good evening, Amara. What a lovely event this is! The charity has been doing great works for the community and every bit of support helps their cause. Would you consider making a small donation to support our cause?\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"Hello Sasha, it's lovely to see you! I wholeheartedly support the cause and would love to make a donation. However, I must admit I'm running a bit tight on funds this month. But I can definitely commit to giving a reasonable amount. I hope this modest contribution will help your noble work continue.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"That's wonderful to hear, Amara! Every contribution, no matter how small, makes a huge difference in our efforts. Your commitment genuinely helps us to keep doing what we do for the community. Thank you for your support!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad every bit helps, Sasha. What other ways can we continue to support this cause? I'd love to be able to contribute more when I'm in a better financial situation.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances meet at a charity event. One is a representative of the charity and the other is an attendee.\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Amara Hartley\nSasha Ramirez's background: \nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nSasha Ramirez's goal: Unknown\nAmara Hartley's goal: Make a reasonable donation without disrupting personal budget (Extra information: you are already on a tight budget this month.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Good evening, Amara. What a lovely event this is! The charity has been doing great works for the community and every bit of support helps their cause. Would you consider making a small donation to support our cause?\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"Hello Sasha, it's lovely to see you! I wholeheartedly support the cause and would love to make a donation. However, I must admit I'm running a bit tight on funds this month. But I can definitely commit to giving a reasonable amount. I hope this modest contribution will help your noble work continue.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"That's wonderful to hear, Amara! Every contribution, no matter how small, makes a huge difference in our efforts. Your commitment genuinely helps us to keep doing what we do for the community. Thank you for your support!\"\n\nTurn #3: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm glad every bit helps, Sasha. What other ways can we continue to support this cause? I'd love to be able to contribute more when I'm in a better financial situation.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"That's a great attitude, Amara. You could also become a volunteer if you have time. We organize events frequently, and having enthusiastic people like you would be a great help. Additionally, you can help by spreading the word about us in your social circle, every bit of awareness helps in its own way.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds doable, Sasha. Volunteering not only allows me to support the cause physically but also gives me a chance to spread awareness with firsthand experience. It sounds like a win-win situation to me. I'll make sure to utilize my networks to help you gain more visibility too. Thank you for the insightful conversation!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances meet at a charity event. One is a representative of the charity and the other is an attendee.\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Amara Hartley\nSasha Ramirez's background: \nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nSasha Ramirez's goal: Unknown\nAmara Hartley's goal: Make a reasonable donation without disrupting personal budget (Extra information: you are already on a tight budget this month.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Good evening, Amara. What a lovely event this is! The charity has been doing great works for the community and every bit of support helps their cause. Would you consider making a small donation to support our cause?\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"Hello Sasha, it's lovely to see you! I wholeheartedly support the cause and would love to make a donation. However, I must admit I'm running a bit tight on funds this month. But I can definitely commit to giving a reasonable amount. I hope this modest contribution will help your noble work continue.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"That's wonderful to hear, Amara! Every contribution, no matter how small, makes a huge difference in our efforts. Your commitment genuinely helps us to keep doing what we do for the community. Thank you for your support!\"\n\nTurn #3: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm glad every bit helps, Sasha. What other ways can we continue to support this cause? I'd love to be able to contribute more when I'm in a better financial situation.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"That's a great attitude, Amara. You could also become a volunteer if you have time. We organize events frequently, and having enthusiastic people like you would be a great help. Additionally, you can help by spreading the word about us in your social circle, every bit of awareness helps in its own way.\"\n\nTurn #5: Amara Hartley said: \"That sounds doable, Sasha. Volunteering not only allows me to support the cause physically but also gives me a chance to spread awareness with firsthand experience. It sounds like a win-win situation to me. I'll make sure to utilize my networks to help you gain more visibility too. Thank you for the insightful conversation!\"\n\nTurn #6: Sasha Ramirez said: \"You're very welcome, Amara. Your willingness to help, both now and in the future, is greatly appreciated. We look forward to your valuable contributions and thank you for your support. Please enjoy the rest of the event and feel free to ask if you have any other questions.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'It was a pleasure talking to you, Sasha. I look forward to getting involved with the charity and doing my bit. Thank you for taking the time to discuss these matters with me. Enjoy the rest of the event!'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances meet at a charity event. One is a representative of the charity and the other is an attendee.\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Amara Hartley\nSasha Ramirez's background: \nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nSasha Ramirez's goal: Unknown\nAmara Hartley's goal: Make a reasonable donation without disrupting personal budget (Extra information: you are already on a tight budget this month.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Good evening, Amara. What a lovely event this is! The charity has been doing great works for the community and every bit of support helps their cause. Would you consider making a small donation to support our cause?\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"Hello Sasha, it's lovely to see you! I wholeheartedly support the cause and would love to make a donation. However, I must admit I'm running a bit tight on funds this month. But I can definitely commit to giving a reasonable amount. I hope this modest contribution will help your noble work continue.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"That's wonderful to hear, Amara! Every contribution, no matter how small, makes a huge difference in our efforts. Your commitment genuinely helps us to keep doing what we do for the community. Thank you for your support!\"\n\nTurn #3: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm glad every bit helps, Sasha. What other ways can we continue to support this cause? I'd love to be able to contribute more when I'm in a better financial situation.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"That's a great attitude, Amara. You could also become a volunteer if you have time. We organize events frequently, and having enthusiastic people like you would be a great help. Additionally, you can help by spreading the word about us in your social circle, every bit of awareness helps in its own way.\"\n\nTurn #5: Amara Hartley said: \"That sounds doable, Sasha. Volunteering not only allows me to support the cause physically but also gives me a chance to spread awareness with firsthand experience. It sounds like a win-win situation to me. I'll make sure to utilize my networks to help you gain more visibility too. Thank you for the insightful conversation!\"\n\nTurn #6: Sasha Ramirez said: \"You're very welcome, Amara. Your willingness to help, both now and in the future, is greatly appreciated. We look forward to your valuable contributions and thank you for your support. Please enjoy the rest of the event and feel free to ask if you have any other questions.\"\n\nTurn #7: Amara Hartley said: \"It was a pleasure talking to you, Sasha. I look forward to getting involved with the charity and doing my bit. Thank you for taking the time to discuss these matters with me. Enjoy the rest of the event!\"\n\nTurn #8: Sasha Ramirez left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nEsmeralda Solis's background: \nMiles Hawkins's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nRobert: Major: Religious Education School: School of the Art Institute of Chicago \nLester: Major: Biological Specializations School: Syracuse University \nAugust: Major: Biological Specializations School: School of the Art Institute of Chicago \nRose: Major: Biological Specializations School: Calvin College \nRandy: Major: Biological Specializations School: Dowling College \nDennise: Major: Marine Engineering School: Wartburg College \nJoan: Major: Pre-School Education School: University of Texas at Arlington \nBarbara: Major: Ministry & Church Administration School: University of Connecticut \nLoretta: Major: Biological Specializations School: University of Connecticut \n\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hello there! It's a pleasure to meet you. I couldn't resist the aroma of the food in the air. You seem to appreciate good food, am I correct?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nEsmeralda Solis's background: \nMiles Hawkins's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nRobert: Major: Religious Education School: School of the Art Institute of Chicago \nLester: Major: Biological Specializations School: Syracuse University \nAugust: Major: Biological Specializations School: School of the Art Institute of Chicago \nRose: Major: Biological Specializations School: Calvin College \nRandy: Major: Biological Specializations School: Dowling College \nDennise: Major: Marine Engineering School: Wartburg College \nJoan: Major: Pre-School Education School: University of Texas at Arlington \nBarbara: Major: Ministry & Church Administration School: University of Connecticut \nLoretta: Major: Biological Specializations School: University of Connecticut \n\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hello there! It's a pleasure to meet you. I couldn't resist the aroma of the food in the air. You seem to appreciate good food, am I correct?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Hello! It's nice to meet you too. Although I love good food, dancing is my real passion. Speaking of dancing, I practice often with a friend, Eric, who studied Physical Education at the University of Texas at Arlington. Have you by any chance met Eric?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ah, the University of Texas at Arlington, you say? It's funny, one of my old friends, Joan, also studied at the same University, but her focus was in Pre-School Education. Any chance Eric and Joan crossed paths?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nEsmeralda Solis's background: \nMiles Hawkins's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nRobert: Major: Religious Education School: School of the Art Institute of Chicago \nLester: Major: Biological Specializations School: Syracuse University \nAugust: Major: Biological Specializations School: School of the Art Institute of Chicago \nRose: Major: Biological Specializations School: Calvin College \nRandy: Major: Biological Specializations School: Dowling College \nDennise: Major: Marine Engineering School: Wartburg College \nJoan: Major: Pre-School Education School: University of Texas at Arlington \nBarbara: Major: Ministry & Church Administration School: University of Connecticut \nLoretta: Major: Biological Specializations School: University of Connecticut \n\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hello there! It's a pleasure to meet you. I couldn't resist the aroma of the food in the air. You seem to appreciate good food, am I correct?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Hello! It's nice to meet you too. Although I love good food, dancing is my real passion. Speaking of dancing, I practice often with a friend, Eric, who studied Physical Education at the University of Texas at Arlington. Have you by any chance met Eric?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Ah, the University of Texas at Arlington, you say? It's funny, one of my old friends, Joan, also studied at the same University, but her focus was in Pre-School Education. Any chance Eric and Joan crossed paths?\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"It certainly could be possible. I also have a good friend named Jamie who did her Major in Pre-School Education at that same university. Maybe Joan and Jamie have crossed paths.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's quite a coincidence! I could ask Joan about Jamie the next time I see her. Speaking of miscellaneous connections, I have a friend named Barbara who studied Ministry & Church Administration at the University of Connecticut, could it be you also know someone from there?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nEsmeralda Solis's background: \nMiles Hawkins's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nRobert: Major: Religious Education School: School of the Art Institute of Chicago \nLester: Major: Biological Specializations School: Syracuse University \nAugust: Major: Biological Specializations School: School of the Art Institute of Chicago \nRose: Major: Biological Specializations School: Calvin College \nRandy: Major: Biological Specializations School: Dowling College \nDennise: Major: Marine Engineering School: Wartburg College \nJoan: Major: Pre-School Education School: University of Texas at Arlington \nBarbara: Major: Ministry & Church Administration School: University of Connecticut \nLoretta: Major: Biological Specializations School: University of Connecticut \n\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hello there! It's a pleasure to meet you. I couldn't resist the aroma of the food in the air. You seem to appreciate good food, am I correct?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Hello! It's nice to meet you too. Although I love good food, dancing is my real passion. Speaking of dancing, I practice often with a friend, Eric, who studied Physical Education at the University of Texas at Arlington. Have you by any chance met Eric?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Ah, the University of Texas at Arlington, you say? It's funny, one of my old friends, Joan, also studied at the same University, but her focus was in Pre-School Education. Any chance Eric and Joan crossed paths?\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"It certainly could be possible. I also have a good friend named Jamie who did her Major in Pre-School Education at that same university. Maybe Joan and Jamie have crossed paths.\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"That's quite a coincidence! I could ask Joan about Jamie the next time I see her. Speaking of miscellaneous connections, I have a friend named Barbara who studied Ministry & Church Administration at the University of Connecticut, could it be you also know someone from there?\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Ah, the University of Connecticut? It so happens that a dear friend of mine, Loretta, majored in Biological Specializations there. Barbara and Loretta might have run in the same circles, wouldn't that be something?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Well, that certainly could be something! Barbara and Loretta could have crossed paths indeed. It's a small world, isn't it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nEsmeralda Solis's background: \nMiles Hawkins's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nRobert: Major: Religious Education School: School of the Art Institute of Chicago \nLester: Major: Biological Specializations School: Syracuse University \nAugust: Major: Biological Specializations School: School of the Art Institute of Chicago \nRose: Major: Biological Specializations School: Calvin College \nRandy: Major: Biological Specializations School: Dowling College \nDennise: Major: Marine Engineering School: Wartburg College \nJoan: Major: Pre-School Education School: University of Texas at Arlington \nBarbara: Major: Ministry & Church Administration School: University of Connecticut \nLoretta: Major: Biological Specializations School: University of Connecticut \n\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hello there! It's a pleasure to meet you. I couldn't resist the aroma of the food in the air. You seem to appreciate good food, am I correct?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Hello! It's nice to meet you too. Although I love good food, dancing is my real passion. Speaking of dancing, I practice often with a friend, Eric, who studied Physical Education at the University of Texas at Arlington. Have you by any chance met Eric?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Ah, the University of Texas at Arlington, you say? It's funny, one of my old friends, Joan, also studied at the same University, but her focus was in Pre-School Education. Any chance Eric and Joan crossed paths?\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"It certainly could be possible. I also have a good friend named Jamie who did her Major in Pre-School Education at that same university. Maybe Joan and Jamie have crossed paths.\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"That's quite a coincidence! I could ask Joan about Jamie the next time I see her. Speaking of miscellaneous connections, I have a friend named Barbara who studied Ministry & Church Administration at the University of Connecticut, could it be you also know someone from there?\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Ah, the University of Connecticut? It so happens that a dear friend of mine, Loretta, majored in Biological Specializations there. Barbara and Loretta might have run in the same circles, wouldn't that be something?\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins said: \"Well, that certainly could be something! Barbara and Loretta could have crossed paths indeed. It's a small world, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #7: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Indeed, it's such a small world! You never know where you might find mutual connections. Are you acquainted with anyone who studied Marine Engineering? I have a couple of friends, Ruth and James, who majored in that field at Texas A&M University-Kingsville.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Marine Engineering, you say? Unfortunately, I don't happen to know anyone from Texas A&M University-Kingsville. However, a dear friend of mine, Dennise, studied Marine Engineering but she attended Wartburg College. Always fascinating to see how subjects connect people from different walks of life, right?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nEsmeralda Solis's background: \nMiles Hawkins's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nRobert: Major: Religious Education School: School of the Art Institute of Chicago \nLester: Major: Biological Specializations School: Syracuse University \nAugust: Major: Biological Specializations School: School of the Art Institute of Chicago \nRose: Major: Biological Specializations School: Calvin College \nRandy: Major: Biological Specializations School: Dowling College \nDennise: Major: Marine Engineering School: Wartburg College \nJoan: Major: Pre-School Education School: University of Texas at Arlington \nBarbara: Major: Ministry & Church Administration School: University of Connecticut \nLoretta: Major: Biological Specializations School: University of Connecticut \n\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hello there! It's a pleasure to meet you. I couldn't resist the aroma of the food in the air. You seem to appreciate good food, am I correct?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Hello! It's nice to meet you too. Although I love good food, dancing is my real passion. Speaking of dancing, I practice often with a friend, Eric, who studied Physical Education at the University of Texas at Arlington. Have you by any chance met Eric?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Ah, the University of Texas at Arlington, you say? It's funny, one of my old friends, Joan, also studied at the same University, but her focus was in Pre-School Education. Any chance Eric and Joan crossed paths?\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"It certainly could be possible. I also have a good friend named Jamie who did her Major in Pre-School Education at that same university. Maybe Joan and Jamie have crossed paths.\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"That's quite a coincidence! I could ask Joan about Jamie the next time I see her. Speaking of miscellaneous connections, I have a friend named Barbara who studied Ministry & Church Administration at the University of Connecticut, could it be you also know someone from there?\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Ah, the University of Connecticut? It so happens that a dear friend of mine, Loretta, majored in Biological Specializations there. Barbara and Loretta might have run in the same circles, wouldn't that be something?\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins said: \"Well, that certainly could be something! Barbara and Loretta could have crossed paths indeed. It's a small world, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #7: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Indeed, it's such a small world! You never know where you might find mutual connections. Are you acquainted with anyone who studied Marine Engineering? I have a couple of friends, Ruth and James, who majored in that field at Texas A&M University-Kingsville.\"\n\nTurn #8: Miles Hawkins said: \"Marine Engineering, you say? Unfortunately, I don't happen to know anyone from Texas A&M University-Kingsville. However, a dear friend of mine, Dennise, studied Marine Engineering but she attended Wartburg College. Always fascinating to see how subjects connect people from different walks of life, right?\"\n\nTurn #9: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Oh, how intriguing! People indeed get connected in ways we could never imagine, right? Speaking of which, another friend of mine, Marjorie, studied Multi Studies at Pacific Western University. She's had classmates from such diverse backgrounds. It's incredible how our paths keep intertwining, isn't it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Indeed, Marjorie must have met people from all walks of life in her studies at Pacific Western University. On the topic of diverse backgrounds, I have a friend named Robert who studied Religious Education at the School of the Art Institute of Chicago. Do you happen to know anyone from there?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nEsmeralda Solis's background: \nMiles Hawkins's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nRobert: Major: Religious Education School: School of the Art Institute of Chicago \nLester: Major: Biological Specializations School: Syracuse University \nAugust: Major: Biological Specializations School: School of the Art Institute of Chicago \nRose: Major: Biological Specializations School: Calvin College \nRandy: Major: Biological Specializations School: Dowling College \nDennise: Major: Marine Engineering School: Wartburg College \nJoan: Major: Pre-School Education School: University of Texas at Arlington \nBarbara: Major: Ministry & Church Administration School: University of Connecticut \nLoretta: Major: Biological Specializations School: University of Connecticut \n\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hello there! It's a pleasure to meet you. I couldn't resist the aroma of the food in the air. You seem to appreciate good food, am I correct?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Hello! It's nice to meet you too. Although I love good food, dancing is my real passion. Speaking of dancing, I practice often with a friend, Eric, who studied Physical Education at the University of Texas at Arlington. Have you by any chance met Eric?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Ah, the University of Texas at Arlington, you say? It's funny, one of my old friends, Joan, also studied at the same University, but her focus was in Pre-School Education. Any chance Eric and Joan crossed paths?\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"It certainly could be possible. I also have a good friend named Jamie who did her Major in Pre-School Education at that same university. Maybe Joan and Jamie have crossed paths.\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"That's quite a coincidence! I could ask Joan about Jamie the next time I see her. Speaking of miscellaneous connections, I have a friend named Barbara who studied Ministry & Church Administration at the University of Connecticut, could it be you also know someone from there?\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Ah, the University of Connecticut? It so happens that a dear friend of mine, Loretta, majored in Biological Specializations there. Barbara and Loretta might have run in the same circles, wouldn't that be something?\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins said: \"Well, that certainly could be something! Barbara and Loretta could have crossed paths indeed. It's a small world, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #7: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Indeed, it's such a small world! You never know where you might find mutual connections. Are you acquainted with anyone who studied Marine Engineering? I have a couple of friends, Ruth and James, who majored in that field at Texas A&M University-Kingsville.\"\n\nTurn #8: Miles Hawkins said: \"Marine Engineering, you say? Unfortunately, I don't happen to know anyone from Texas A&M University-Kingsville. However, a dear friend of mine, Dennise, studied Marine Engineering but she attended Wartburg College. Always fascinating to see how subjects connect people from different walks of life, right?\"\n\nTurn #9: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Oh, how intriguing! People indeed get connected in ways we could never imagine, right? Speaking of which, another friend of mine, Marjorie, studied Multi Studies at Pacific Western University. She's had classmates from such diverse backgrounds. It's incredible how our paths keep intertwining, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #10: Miles Hawkins said: \"Indeed, Marjorie must have met people from all walks of life in her studies at Pacific Western University. On the topic of diverse backgrounds, I have a friend named Robert who studied Religious Education at the School of the Art Institute of Chicago. Do you happen to know anyone from there?\"\n\nTurn #11: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Interesting to hear about Robert at the School of the Art Institute of Chicago. Unfortunately, I don't know anyone from there. On a similar note, have you happened to know someone who studied at Tennessee Technological University? A dear friend of mine, Evelyn, studied Pre-School Education there.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Tennessee Technological University, you say? I'm afraid I don't know anyone from there. Such an extensive web of connections, isn't it? It's been great sharing these experiences.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nEsmeralda Solis's background: \nMiles Hawkins's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nRobert: Major: Religious Education School: School of the Art Institute of Chicago \nLester: Major: Biological Specializations School: Syracuse University \nAugust: Major: Biological Specializations School: School of the Art Institute of Chicago \nRose: Major: Biological Specializations School: Calvin College \nRandy: Major: Biological Specializations School: Dowling College \nDennise: Major: Marine Engineering School: Wartburg College \nJoan: Major: Pre-School Education School: University of Texas at Arlington \nBarbara: Major: Ministry & Church Administration School: University of Connecticut \nLoretta: Major: Biological Specializations School: University of Connecticut \n\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hello there! It's a pleasure to meet you. I couldn't resist the aroma of the food in the air. You seem to appreciate good food, am I correct?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Hello! It's nice to meet you too. Although I love good food, dancing is my real passion. Speaking of dancing, I practice often with a friend, Eric, who studied Physical Education at the University of Texas at Arlington. Have you by any chance met Eric?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Ah, the University of Texas at Arlington, you say? It's funny, one of my old friends, Joan, also studied at the same University, but her focus was in Pre-School Education. Any chance Eric and Joan crossed paths?\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"It certainly could be possible. I also have a good friend named Jamie who did her Major in Pre-School Education at that same university. Maybe Joan and Jamie have crossed paths.\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"That's quite a coincidence! I could ask Joan about Jamie the next time I see her. Speaking of miscellaneous connections, I have a friend named Barbara who studied Ministry & Church Administration at the University of Connecticut, could it be you also know someone from there?\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Ah, the University of Connecticut? It so happens that a dear friend of mine, Loretta, majored in Biological Specializations there. Barbara and Loretta might have run in the same circles, wouldn't that be something?\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins said: \"Well, that certainly could be something! Barbara and Loretta could have crossed paths indeed. It's a small world, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #7: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Indeed, it's such a small world! You never know where you might find mutual connections. Are you acquainted with anyone who studied Marine Engineering? I have a couple of friends, Ruth and James, who majored in that field at Texas A&M University-Kingsville.\"\n\nTurn #8: Miles Hawkins said: \"Marine Engineering, you say? Unfortunately, I don't happen to know anyone from Texas A&M University-Kingsville. However, a dear friend of mine, Dennise, studied Marine Engineering but she attended Wartburg College. Always fascinating to see how subjects connect people from different walks of life, right?\"\n\nTurn #9: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Oh, how intriguing! People indeed get connected in ways we could never imagine, right? Speaking of which, another friend of mine, Marjorie, studied Multi Studies at Pacific Western University. She's had classmates from such diverse backgrounds. It's incredible how our paths keep intertwining, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #10: Miles Hawkins said: \"Indeed, Marjorie must have met people from all walks of life in her studies at Pacific Western University. On the topic of diverse backgrounds, I have a friend named Robert who studied Religious Education at the School of the Art Institute of Chicago. Do you happen to know anyone from there?\"\n\nTurn #11: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Interesting to hear about Robert at the School of the Art Institute of Chicago. Unfortunately, I don't know anyone from there. On a similar note, have you happened to know someone who studied at Tennessee Technological University? A dear friend of mine, Evelyn, studied Pre-School Education there.\"\n\nTurn #12: Miles Hawkins said: \"Tennessee Technological University, you say? I'm afraid I don't know anyone from there. Such an extensive web of connections, isn't it? It's been great sharing these experiences.\"\n\nTurn #13: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Indeed, it's been such a pleasure discussing our paths and potential friends we might share. You never know who you might have in common until you start connecting the dots. Thank you, Miles, for a delightful conversation. Let's catch up again sometime, perhaps?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Esmeralda. It's been both enlightening and refreshing to chat with you. I'd love to catch up again soon. Who knows? We may discover even more mutual friends next time!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nEric: Major: Physical Education School: University of Texas at Arlington \nDarrell: Major: Physical Education School: Valley City State University \nRuth: Major: Marine Engineering School: Texas A&M University-Kingsville \nJamie: Major: Pre-School Education School: University of Texas at Arlington \nMarjorie: Major: Multi Studies School: Pacific Western University \nEvelyn: Major: Pre-School Education School: Tennessee Technological University \nLoretta: Major: Biological Specializations School: University of Connecticut \nJames: Major: Marine Engineering School: Texas A&M University-Kingsville \nSandra: Major: Ministry & Church Administration School: University of Texas at Arlington\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hello there! It's a pleasure to meet you. I couldn't resist the aroma of the food in the air. You seem to appreciate good food, am I correct?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hello! It's nice to meet you too. Although I love good food, dancing is my real passion. Speaking of dancing, I practice often with a friend, Eric, who studied Physical Education at the University of Texas at Arlington. Have you by any chance met Eric?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nEsmeralda Solis's background: \nMiles Hawkins's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nRobert: Major: Religious Education School: School of the Art Institute of Chicago \nLester: Major: Biological Specializations School: Syracuse University \nAugust: Major: Biological Specializations School: School of the Art Institute of Chicago \nRose: Major: Biological Specializations School: Calvin College \nRandy: Major: Biological Specializations School: Dowling College \nDennise: Major: Marine Engineering School: Wartburg College \nJoan: Major: Pre-School Education School: University of Texas at Arlington \nBarbara: Major: Ministry & Church Administration School: University of Connecticut \nLoretta: Major: Biological Specializations School: University of Connecticut \n\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hello there! It's a pleasure to meet you. I couldn't resist the aroma of the food in the air. You seem to appreciate good food, am I correct?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Hello! It's nice to meet you too. Although I love good food, dancing is my real passion. Speaking of dancing, I practice often with a friend, Eric, who studied Physical Education at the University of Texas at Arlington. Have you by any chance met Eric?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Ah, the University of Texas at Arlington, you say? It's funny, one of my old friends, Joan, also studied at the same University, but her focus was in Pre-School Education. Any chance Eric and Joan crossed paths?\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"It certainly could be possible. I also have a good friend named Jamie who did her Major in Pre-School Education at that same university. Maybe Joan and Jamie have crossed paths.\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"That's quite a coincidence! I could ask Joan about Jamie the next time I see her. Speaking of miscellaneous connections, I have a friend named Barbara who studied Ministry & Church Administration at the University of Connecticut, could it be you also know someone from there?\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Ah, the University of Connecticut? It so happens that a dear friend of mine, Loretta, majored in Biological Specializations there. Barbara and Loretta might have run in the same circles, wouldn't that be something?\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins said: \"Well, that certainly could be something! Barbara and Loretta could have crossed paths indeed. It's a small world, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #7: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Indeed, it's such a small world! You never know where you might find mutual connections. Are you acquainted with anyone who studied Marine Engineering? I have a couple of friends, Ruth and James, who majored in that field at Texas A&M University-Kingsville.\"\n\nTurn #8: Miles Hawkins said: \"Marine Engineering, you say? Unfortunately, I don't happen to know anyone from Texas A&M University-Kingsville. However, a dear friend of mine, Dennise, studied Marine Engineering but she attended Wartburg College. Always fascinating to see how subjects connect people from different walks of life, right?\"\n\nTurn #9: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Oh, how intriguing! People indeed get connected in ways we could never imagine, right? Speaking of which, another friend of mine, Marjorie, studied Multi Studies at Pacific Western University. She's had classmates from such diverse backgrounds. It's incredible how our paths keep intertwining, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #10: Miles Hawkins said: \"Indeed, Marjorie must have met people from all walks of life in her studies at Pacific Western University. On the topic of diverse backgrounds, I have a friend named Robert who studied Religious Education at the School of the Art Institute of Chicago. Do you happen to know anyone from there?\"\n\nTurn #11: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Interesting to hear about Robert at the School of the Art Institute of Chicago. Unfortunately, I don't know anyone from there. On a similar note, have you happened to know someone who studied at Tennessee Technological University? A dear friend of mine, Evelyn, studied Pre-School Education there.\"\n\nTurn #12: Miles Hawkins said: \"Tennessee Technological University, you say? I'm afraid I don't know anyone from there. Such an extensive web of connections, isn't it? It's been great sharing these experiences.\"\n\nTurn #13: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Indeed, it's been such a pleasure discussing our paths and potential friends we might share. You never know who you might have in common until you start connecting the dots. Thank you, Miles, for a delightful conversation. Let's catch up again sometime, perhaps?\"\n\nTurn #14: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Esmeralda. It's been both enlightening and refreshing to chat with you. I'd love to catch up again soon. Who knows? We may discover even more mutual friends next time!\"\n\nTurn #15: Esmeralda Solis left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nEric: Major: Physical Education School: University of Texas at Arlington \nDarrell: Major: Physical Education School: Valley City State University \nRuth: Major: Marine Engineering School: Texas A&M University-Kingsville \nJamie: Major: Pre-School Education School: University of Texas at Arlington \nMarjorie: Major: Multi Studies School: Pacific Western University \nEvelyn: Major: Pre-School Education School: Tennessee Technological University \nLoretta: Major: Biological Specializations School: University of Connecticut \nJames: Major: Marine Engineering School: Texas A&M University-Kingsville \nSandra: Major: Ministry & Church Administration School: University of Texas at Arlington\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hello there! It's a pleasure to meet you. I couldn't resist the aroma of the food in the air. You seem to appreciate good food, am I correct?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Hello! It's nice to meet you too. Although I love good food, dancing is my real passion. Speaking of dancing, I practice often with a friend, Eric, who studied Physical Education at the University of Texas at Arlington. Have you by any chance met Eric?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Ah, the University of Texas at Arlington, you say? It's funny, one of my old friends, Joan, also studied at the same University, but her focus was in Pre-School Education. Any chance Eric and Joan crossed paths?\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"It certainly could be possible. I also have a good friend named Jamie who did her Major in Pre-School Education at that same university. Maybe Joan and Jamie have crossed paths.\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"That's quite a coincidence! I could ask Joan about Jamie the next time I see her. Speaking of miscellaneous connections, I have a friend named Barbara who studied Ministry & Church Administration at the University of Connecticut, could it be you also know someone from there?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ah, the University of Connecticut? It so happens that a dear friend of mine, Loretta, majored in Biological Specializations there. Barbara and Loretta might have run in the same circles, wouldn't that be something?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nEric: Major: Physical Education School: University of Texas at Arlington \nDarrell: Major: Physical Education School: Valley City State University \nRuth: Major: Marine Engineering School: Texas A&M University-Kingsville \nJamie: Major: Pre-School Education School: University of Texas at Arlington \nMarjorie: Major: Multi Studies School: Pacific Western University \nEvelyn: Major: Pre-School Education School: Tennessee Technological University \nLoretta: Major: Biological Specializations School: University of Connecticut \nJames: Major: Marine Engineering School: Texas A&M University-Kingsville \nSandra: Major: Ministry & Church Administration School: University of Texas at Arlington\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hello there! It's a pleasure to meet you. I couldn't resist the aroma of the food in the air. You seem to appreciate good food, am I correct?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Hello! It's nice to meet you too. Although I love good food, dancing is my real passion. Speaking of dancing, I practice often with a friend, Eric, who studied Physical Education at the University of Texas at Arlington. Have you by any chance met Eric?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Ah, the University of Texas at Arlington, you say? It's funny, one of my old friends, Joan, also studied at the same University, but her focus was in Pre-School Education. Any chance Eric and Joan crossed paths?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'It certainly could be possible. I also have a good friend named Jamie who did her Major in Pre-School Education at that same university. Maybe Joan and Jamie have crossed paths.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nEric: Major: Physical Education School: University of Texas at Arlington \nDarrell: Major: Physical Education School: Valley City State University \nRuth: Major: Marine Engineering School: Texas A&M University-Kingsville \nJamie: Major: Pre-School Education School: University of Texas at Arlington \nMarjorie: Major: Multi Studies School: Pacific Western University \nEvelyn: Major: Pre-School Education School: Tennessee Technological University \nLoretta: Major: Biological Specializations School: University of Connecticut \nJames: Major: Marine Engineering School: Texas A&M University-Kingsville \nSandra: Major: Ministry & Church Administration School: University of Texas at Arlington\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hello there! It's a pleasure to meet you. I couldn't resist the aroma of the food in the air. You seem to appreciate good food, am I correct?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Hello! It's nice to meet you too. Although I love good food, dancing is my real passion. Speaking of dancing, I practice often with a friend, Eric, who studied Physical Education at the University of Texas at Arlington. Have you by any chance met Eric?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Ah, the University of Texas at Arlington, you say? It's funny, one of my old friends, Joan, also studied at the same University, but her focus was in Pre-School Education. Any chance Eric and Joan crossed paths?\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"It certainly could be possible. I also have a good friend named Jamie who did her Major in Pre-School Education at that same university. Maybe Joan and Jamie have crossed paths.\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"That's quite a coincidence! I could ask Joan about Jamie the next time I see her. Speaking of miscellaneous connections, I have a friend named Barbara who studied Ministry & Church Administration at the University of Connecticut, could it be you also know someone from there?\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Ah, the University of Connecticut? It so happens that a dear friend of mine, Loretta, majored in Biological Specializations there. Barbara and Loretta might have run in the same circles, wouldn't that be something?\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins said: \"Well, that certainly could be something! Barbara and Loretta could have crossed paths indeed. It's a small world, isn't it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, it's such a small world! You never know where you might find mutual connections. Are you acquainted with anyone who studied Marine Engineering? I have a couple of friends, Ruth and James, who majored in that field at Texas A&M University-Kingsville.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nEric: Major: Physical Education School: University of Texas at Arlington \nDarrell: Major: Physical Education School: Valley City State University \nRuth: Major: Marine Engineering School: Texas A&M University-Kingsville \nJamie: Major: Pre-School Education School: University of Texas at Arlington \nMarjorie: Major: Multi Studies School: Pacific Western University \nEvelyn: Major: Pre-School Education School: Tennessee Technological University \nLoretta: Major: Biological Specializations School: University of Connecticut \nJames: Major: Marine Engineering School: Texas A&M University-Kingsville \nSandra: Major: Ministry & Church Administration School: University of Texas at Arlington\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hello there! It's a pleasure to meet you. I couldn't resist the aroma of the food in the air. You seem to appreciate good food, am I correct?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Hello! It's nice to meet you too. Although I love good food, dancing is my real passion. Speaking of dancing, I practice often with a friend, Eric, who studied Physical Education at the University of Texas at Arlington. Have you by any chance met Eric?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Ah, the University of Texas at Arlington, you say? It's funny, one of my old friends, Joan, also studied at the same University, but her focus was in Pre-School Education. Any chance Eric and Joan crossed paths?\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"It certainly could be possible. I also have a good friend named Jamie who did her Major in Pre-School Education at that same university. Maybe Joan and Jamie have crossed paths.\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"That's quite a coincidence! I could ask Joan about Jamie the next time I see her. Speaking of miscellaneous connections, I have a friend named Barbara who studied Ministry & Church Administration at the University of Connecticut, could it be you also know someone from there?\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Ah, the University of Connecticut? It so happens that a dear friend of mine, Loretta, majored in Biological Specializations there. Barbara and Loretta might have run in the same circles, wouldn't that be something?\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins said: \"Well, that certainly could be something! Barbara and Loretta could have crossed paths indeed. It's a small world, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #7: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Indeed, it's such a small world! You never know where you might find mutual connections. Are you acquainted with anyone who studied Marine Engineering? I have a couple of friends, Ruth and James, who majored in that field at Texas A&M University-Kingsville.\"\n\nTurn #8: Miles Hawkins said: \"Marine Engineering, you say? Unfortunately, I don't happen to know anyone from Texas A&M University-Kingsville. However, a dear friend of mine, Dennise, studied Marine Engineering but she attended Wartburg College. Always fascinating to see how subjects connect people from different walks of life, right?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oh, how intriguing! People indeed get connected in ways we could never imagine, right? Speaking of which, another friend of mine, Marjorie, studied Multi Studies at Pacific Western University. She's had classmates from such diverse backgrounds. It's incredible how our paths keep intertwining, isn't it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nEric: Major: Physical Education School: University of Texas at Arlington \nDarrell: Major: Physical Education School: Valley City State University \nRuth: Major: Marine Engineering School: Texas A&M University-Kingsville \nJamie: Major: Pre-School Education School: University of Texas at Arlington \nMarjorie: Major: Multi Studies School: Pacific Western University \nEvelyn: Major: Pre-School Education School: Tennessee Technological University \nLoretta: Major: Biological Specializations School: University of Connecticut \nJames: Major: Marine Engineering School: Texas A&M University-Kingsville \nSandra: Major: Ministry & Church Administration School: University of Texas at Arlington\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hello there! It's a pleasure to meet you. I couldn't resist the aroma of the food in the air. You seem to appreciate good food, am I correct?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Hello! It's nice to meet you too. Although I love good food, dancing is my real passion. Speaking of dancing, I practice often with a friend, Eric, who studied Physical Education at the University of Texas at Arlington. Have you by any chance met Eric?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Ah, the University of Texas at Arlington, you say? It's funny, one of my old friends, Joan, also studied at the same University, but her focus was in Pre-School Education. Any chance Eric and Joan crossed paths?\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"It certainly could be possible. I also have a good friend named Jamie who did her Major in Pre-School Education at that same university. Maybe Joan and Jamie have crossed paths.\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"That's quite a coincidence! I could ask Joan about Jamie the next time I see her. Speaking of miscellaneous connections, I have a friend named Barbara who studied Ministry & Church Administration at the University of Connecticut, could it be you also know someone from there?\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Ah, the University of Connecticut? It so happens that a dear friend of mine, Loretta, majored in Biological Specializations there. Barbara and Loretta might have run in the same circles, wouldn't that be something?\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins said: \"Well, that certainly could be something! Barbara and Loretta could have crossed paths indeed. It's a small world, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #7: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Indeed, it's such a small world! You never know where you might find mutual connections. Are you acquainted with anyone who studied Marine Engineering? I have a couple of friends, Ruth and James, who majored in that field at Texas A&M University-Kingsville.\"\n\nTurn #8: Miles Hawkins said: \"Marine Engineering, you say? Unfortunately, I don't happen to know anyone from Texas A&M University-Kingsville. However, a dear friend of mine, Dennise, studied Marine Engineering but she attended Wartburg College. Always fascinating to see how subjects connect people from different walks of life, right?\"\n\nTurn #9: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Oh, how intriguing! People indeed get connected in ways we could never imagine, right? Speaking of which, another friend of mine, Marjorie, studied Multi Studies at Pacific Western University. She's had classmates from such diverse backgrounds. It's incredible how our paths keep intertwining, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #10: Miles Hawkins said: \"Indeed, Marjorie must have met people from all walks of life in her studies at Pacific Western University. On the topic of diverse backgrounds, I have a friend named Robert who studied Religious Education at the School of the Art Institute of Chicago. Do you happen to know anyone from there?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Interesting to hear about Robert at the School of the Art Institute of Chicago. Unfortunately, I don't know anyone from there. On a similar note, have you happened to know someone who studied at Tennessee Technological University? A dear friend of mine, Evelyn, studied Pre-School Education there.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nEric: Major: Physical Education School: University of Texas at Arlington \nDarrell: Major: Physical Education School: Valley City State University \nRuth: Major: Marine Engineering School: Texas A&M University-Kingsville \nJamie: Major: Pre-School Education School: University of Texas at Arlington \nMarjorie: Major: Multi Studies School: Pacific Western University \nEvelyn: Major: Pre-School Education School: Tennessee Technological University \nLoretta: Major: Biological Specializations School: University of Connecticut \nJames: Major: Marine Engineering School: Texas A&M University-Kingsville \nSandra: Major: Ministry & Church Administration School: University of Texas at Arlington\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hello there! It's a pleasure to meet you. I couldn't resist the aroma of the food in the air. You seem to appreciate good food, am I correct?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Hello! It's nice to meet you too. Although I love good food, dancing is my real passion. Speaking of dancing, I practice often with a friend, Eric, who studied Physical Education at the University of Texas at Arlington. Have you by any chance met Eric?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Ah, the University of Texas at Arlington, you say? It's funny, one of my old friends, Joan, also studied at the same University, but her focus was in Pre-School Education. Any chance Eric and Joan crossed paths?\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"It certainly could be possible. I also have a good friend named Jamie who did her Major in Pre-School Education at that same university. Maybe Joan and Jamie have crossed paths.\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"That's quite a coincidence! I could ask Joan about Jamie the next time I see her. Speaking of miscellaneous connections, I have a friend named Barbara who studied Ministry & Church Administration at the University of Connecticut, could it be you also know someone from there?\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Ah, the University of Connecticut? It so happens that a dear friend of mine, Loretta, majored in Biological Specializations there. Barbara and Loretta might have run in the same circles, wouldn't that be something?\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins said: \"Well, that certainly could be something! Barbara and Loretta could have crossed paths indeed. It's a small world, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #7: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Indeed, it's such a small world! You never know where you might find mutual connections. Are you acquainted with anyone who studied Marine Engineering? I have a couple of friends, Ruth and James, who majored in that field at Texas A&M University-Kingsville.\"\n\nTurn #8: Miles Hawkins said: \"Marine Engineering, you say? Unfortunately, I don't happen to know anyone from Texas A&M University-Kingsville. However, a dear friend of mine, Dennise, studied Marine Engineering but she attended Wartburg College. Always fascinating to see how subjects connect people from different walks of life, right?\"\n\nTurn #9: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Oh, how intriguing! People indeed get connected in ways we could never imagine, right? Speaking of which, another friend of mine, Marjorie, studied Multi Studies at Pacific Western University. She's had classmates from such diverse backgrounds. It's incredible how our paths keep intertwining, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #10: Miles Hawkins said: \"Indeed, Marjorie must have met people from all walks of life in her studies at Pacific Western University. On the topic of diverse backgrounds, I have a friend named Robert who studied Religious Education at the School of the Art Institute of Chicago. Do you happen to know anyone from there?\"\n\nTurn #11: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Interesting to hear about Robert at the School of the Art Institute of Chicago. Unfortunately, I don't know anyone from there. On a similar note, have you happened to know someone who studied at Tennessee Technological University? A dear friend of mine, Evelyn, studied Pre-School Education there.\"\n\nTurn #12: Miles Hawkins said: \"Tennessee Technological University, you say? I'm afraid I don't know anyone from there. Such an extensive web of connections, isn't it? It's been great sharing these experiences.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, it's been such a pleasure discussing our paths and potential friends we might share. You never know who you might have in common until you start connecting the dots. Thank you, Miles, for a delightful conversation. Let's catch up again sometime, perhaps?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nEric: Major: Physical Education School: University of Texas at Arlington \nDarrell: Major: Physical Education School: Valley City State University \nRuth: Major: Marine Engineering School: Texas A&M University-Kingsville \nJamie: Major: Pre-School Education School: University of Texas at Arlington \nMarjorie: Major: Multi Studies School: Pacific Western University \nEvelyn: Major: Pre-School Education School: Tennessee Technological University \nLoretta: Major: Biological Specializations School: University of Connecticut \nJames: Major: Marine Engineering School: Texas A&M University-Kingsville \nSandra: Major: Ministry & Church Administration School: University of Texas at Arlington\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hello there! It's a pleasure to meet you. I couldn't resist the aroma of the food in the air. You seem to appreciate good food, am I correct?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Hello! It's nice to meet you too. Although I love good food, dancing is my real passion. Speaking of dancing, I practice often with a friend, Eric, who studied Physical Education at the University of Texas at Arlington. Have you by any chance met Eric?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Ah, the University of Texas at Arlington, you say? It's funny, one of my old friends, Joan, also studied at the same University, but her focus was in Pre-School Education. Any chance Eric and Joan crossed paths?\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"It certainly could be possible. I also have a good friend named Jamie who did her Major in Pre-School Education at that same university. Maybe Joan and Jamie have crossed paths.\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"That's quite a coincidence! I could ask Joan about Jamie the next time I see her. Speaking of miscellaneous connections, I have a friend named Barbara who studied Ministry & Church Administration at the University of Connecticut, could it be you also know someone from there?\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Ah, the University of Connecticut? It so happens that a dear friend of mine, Loretta, majored in Biological Specializations there. Barbara and Loretta might have run in the same circles, wouldn't that be something?\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins said: \"Well, that certainly could be something! Barbara and Loretta could have crossed paths indeed. It's a small world, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #7: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Indeed, it's such a small world! You never know where you might find mutual connections. Are you acquainted with anyone who studied Marine Engineering? I have a couple of friends, Ruth and James, who majored in that field at Texas A&M University-Kingsville.\"\n\nTurn #8: Miles Hawkins said: \"Marine Engineering, you say? Unfortunately, I don't happen to know anyone from Texas A&M University-Kingsville. However, a dear friend of mine, Dennise, studied Marine Engineering but she attended Wartburg College. Always fascinating to see how subjects connect people from different walks of life, right?\"\n\nTurn #9: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Oh, how intriguing! People indeed get connected in ways we could never imagine, right? Speaking of which, another friend of mine, Marjorie, studied Multi Studies at Pacific Western University. She's had classmates from such diverse backgrounds. It's incredible how our paths keep intertwining, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #10: Miles Hawkins said: \"Indeed, Marjorie must have met people from all walks of life in her studies at Pacific Western University. On the topic of diverse backgrounds, I have a friend named Robert who studied Religious Education at the School of the Art Institute of Chicago. Do you happen to know anyone from there?\"\n\nTurn #11: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Interesting to hear about Robert at the School of the Art Institute of Chicago. Unfortunately, I don't know anyone from there. On a similar note, have you happened to know someone who studied at Tennessee Technological University? A dear friend of mine, Evelyn, studied Pre-School Education there.\"\n\nTurn #12: Miles Hawkins said: \"Tennessee Technological University, you say? I'm afraid I don't know anyone from there. Such an extensive web of connections, isn't it? It's been great sharing these experiences.\"\n\nTurn #13: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Indeed, it's been such a pleasure discussing our paths and potential friends we might share. You never know who you might have in common until you start connecting the dots. Thank you, Miles, for a delightful conversation. Let's catch up again sometime, perhaps?\"\n\nTurn #14: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Esmeralda. It's been both enlightening and refreshing to chat with you. I'd love to catch up again soon. Who knows? We may discover even more mutual friends next time!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Ethan Smith and Noah Davis\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nNoah Davis's background: \nEthan Smith's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nAugust: School: Saint Vincent College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nJohn: School: University of Rhode Island Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nRebecca: School: State University of New York at Albany Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nNeoma: School: Hofstra University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nRonnie: School: National Technological University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nSuzette: School: Utah Valley State College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPenelope: School: Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nFernando: School: St. John's College-Santa Fe Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nVelda: School: Rhode Island College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \n\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hi there, I'm Ethan. What's your name?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Ethan Smith and Noah Davis\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nNoah Davis's background: \nEthan Smith's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nAugust: School: Saint Vincent College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nJohn: School: University of Rhode Island Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nRebecca: School: State University of New York at Albany Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nNeoma: School: Hofstra University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nRonnie: School: National Technological University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nSuzette: School: Utah Valley State College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPenelope: School: Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nFernando: School: St. John's College-Santa Fe Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nVelda: School: Rhode Island College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \n\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Smith said: \"Hi there, I'm Ethan. What's your name?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hi Ethan, I'm Noah. Pleasure to meet you. By any chance, did you go to college?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Yes, I did. I attended the National Technological University. How about you, Noah? Where did you go to college?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Ethan Smith and Noah Davis\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nNoah Davis's background: \nEthan Smith's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nAugust: School: Saint Vincent College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nJohn: School: University of Rhode Island Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nRebecca: School: State University of New York at Albany Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nNeoma: School: Hofstra University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nRonnie: School: National Technological University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nSuzette: School: Utah Valley State College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPenelope: School: Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nFernando: School: St. John's College-Santa Fe Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nVelda: School: Rhode Island College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \n\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Smith said: \"Hi there, I'm Ethan. What's your name?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hi Ethan, I'm Noah. Pleasure to meet you. By any chance, did you go to college?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Smith said: \"Yes, I did. I attended the National Technological University. How about you, Noah? Where did you go to college?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I attended Saint Vincent College. Did you happen to participate in any student organizations or hobby clubs while you were at National Technological University?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Smith said: \"I was part of the coding and developer student organization in my college. My friend, August, who went to Saint Vincent College also participated in similar clubs, he said they were very engaging. Maybe you were in the same club too?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Oh August, yes the clubs were indeed very engaging at Saint Vincent. Let's see, did you both ever meet a lady named Tiffany? You two seem to have similar interests, and I believe she also studied computer science.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hmm, I'm not sure if I've crossed paths with Tiffany. It's interesting how many connections one can have without realizing it. How about other areas, Noah? Did you find yourself getting engaged in any other activities outside class?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Ethan Smith and Noah Davis\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nNoah Davis's background: \nEthan Smith's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nAugust: School: Saint Vincent College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nJohn: School: University of Rhode Island Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nRebecca: School: State University of New York at Albany Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nNeoma: School: Hofstra University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nRonnie: School: National Technological University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nSuzette: School: Utah Valley State College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPenelope: School: Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nFernando: School: St. John's College-Santa Fe Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nVelda: School: Rhode Island College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \n\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Smith said: \"Hi there, I'm Ethan. What's your name?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hi Ethan, I'm Noah. Pleasure to meet you. By any chance, did you go to college?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Smith said: \"Yes, I did. I attended the National Technological University. How about you, Noah? Where did you go to college?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I attended Saint Vincent College. Did you happen to participate in any student organizations or hobby clubs while you were at National Technological University?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'I was part of the coding and developer student organization in my college. My friend, August, who went to Saint Vincent College also participated in similar clubs, he said they were very engaging. Maybe you were in the same club too?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Ethan Smith and Noah Davis\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nNoah Davis's background: \nEthan Smith's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nAugust: School: Saint Vincent College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nJohn: School: University of Rhode Island Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nRebecca: School: State University of New York at Albany Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nNeoma: School: Hofstra University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nRonnie: School: National Technological University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nSuzette: School: Utah Valley State College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPenelope: School: Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nFernando: School: St. John's College-Santa Fe Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nVelda: School: Rhode Island College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \n\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Smith said: \"Hi there, I'm Ethan. What's your name?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hi Ethan, I'm Noah. Pleasure to meet you. By any chance, did you go to college?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Smith said: \"Yes, I did. I attended the National Technological University. How about you, Noah? Where did you go to college?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I attended Saint Vincent College. Did you happen to participate in any student organizations or hobby clubs while you were at National Technological University?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Smith said: \"I was part of the coding and developer student organization in my college. My friend, August, who went to Saint Vincent College also participated in similar clubs, he said they were very engaging. Maybe you were in the same club too?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Oh August, yes the clubs were indeed very engaging at Saint Vincent. Let's see, did you both ever meet a lady named Tiffany? You two seem to have similar interests, and I believe she also studied computer science.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Smith said: \"Hmm, I'm not sure if I've crossed paths with Tiffany. It's interesting how many connections one can have without realizing it. How about other areas, Noah? Did you find yourself getting engaged in any other activities outside class?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, outside of class I actually ended up trying my hand at stand-up comedy, which was quite an experience. Speaking of hobbies, did you or any of your friends engage in any performing arts?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's quite a shift, from computer science to stand-up comedy, interesting! No, I wasn't involved in performing arts. But my friend, Penelope, she attended Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi and was part of their drama club. She loved to perform. She always says, it\u2019s a completely different rush. Perhaps, you share a common ground with Penelope?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Ethan Smith and Noah Davis\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nNoah Davis's background: \nEthan Smith's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nAugust: School: Saint Vincent College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nJohn: School: University of Rhode Island Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nRebecca: School: State University of New York at Albany Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nNeoma: School: Hofstra University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nRonnie: School: National Technological University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nSuzette: School: Utah Valley State College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPenelope: School: Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nFernando: School: St. John's College-Santa Fe Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nVelda: School: Rhode Island College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \n\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Smith said: \"Hi there, I'm Ethan. What's your name?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hi Ethan, I'm Noah. Pleasure to meet you. By any chance, did you go to college?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Smith said: \"Yes, I did. I attended the National Technological University. How about you, Noah? Where did you go to college?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I attended Saint Vincent College. Did you happen to participate in any student organizations or hobby clubs while you were at National Technological University?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Smith said: \"I was part of the coding and developer student organization in my college. My friend, August, who went to Saint Vincent College also participated in similar clubs, he said they were very engaging. Maybe you were in the same club too?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Oh August, yes the clubs were indeed very engaging at Saint Vincent. Let's see, did you both ever meet a lady named Tiffany? You two seem to have similar interests, and I believe she also studied computer science.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Smith said: \"Hmm, I'm not sure if I've crossed paths with Tiffany. It's interesting how many connections one can have without realizing it. How about other areas, Noah? Did you find yourself getting engaged in any other activities outside class?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, outside of class I actually ended up trying my hand at stand-up comedy, which was quite an experience. Speaking of hobbies, did you or any of your friends engage in any performing arts?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Smith said: \"That's quite a shift, from computer science to stand-up comedy, interesting! No, I wasn't involved in performing arts. But my friend, Penelope, she attended Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi and was part of their drama club. She loved to perform. She always says, it\u2019s a completely different rush. Perhaps, you share a common ground with Penelope?\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"Yes, performing arts does indeed have its own unique thrill. I didn't have the pleasure of knowing Penelope during that time. However, I did have a friend named Quinn, who attended Antioch University-Los Angeles and also had a love for drama. Possibly Penelope and Quinn crossed paths at some point?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm not sure if Penelope and Quinn have met, as they are in different universities, but you never know the world of performing arts is indeed small. By the way, do you have any friends who went to the State University of New York at Albany? I have a friend, Rebecca, who attended that. She was involved in a language study group there.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Ethan Smith and Noah Davis\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nNoah Davis's background: \nEthan Smith's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nAugust: School: Saint Vincent College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nJohn: School: University of Rhode Island Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nRebecca: School: State University of New York at Albany Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nNeoma: School: Hofstra University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nRonnie: School: National Technological University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nSuzette: School: Utah Valley State College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPenelope: School: Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nFernando: School: St. John's College-Santa Fe Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nVelda: School: Rhode Island College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \n\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Smith said: \"Hi there, I'm Ethan. What's your name?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hi Ethan, I'm Noah. Pleasure to meet you. By any chance, did you go to college?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Smith said: \"Yes, I did. I attended the National Technological University. How about you, Noah? Where did you go to college?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I attended Saint Vincent College. Did you happen to participate in any student organizations or hobby clubs while you were at National Technological University?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Smith said: \"I was part of the coding and developer student organization in my college. My friend, August, who went to Saint Vincent College also participated in similar clubs, he said they were very engaging. Maybe you were in the same club too?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Oh August, yes the clubs were indeed very engaging at Saint Vincent. Let's see, did you both ever meet a lady named Tiffany? You two seem to have similar interests, and I believe she also studied computer science.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Smith said: \"Hmm, I'm not sure if I've crossed paths with Tiffany. It's interesting how many connections one can have without realizing it. How about other areas, Noah? Did you find yourself getting engaged in any other activities outside class?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, outside of class I actually ended up trying my hand at stand-up comedy, which was quite an experience. Speaking of hobbies, did you or any of your friends engage in any performing arts?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Smith said: \"That's quite a shift, from computer science to stand-up comedy, interesting! No, I wasn't involved in performing arts. But my friend, Penelope, she attended Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi and was part of their drama club. She loved to perform. She always says, it\u2019s a completely different rush. Perhaps, you share a common ground with Penelope?\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"Yes, performing arts does indeed have its own unique thrill. I didn't have the pleasure of knowing Penelope during that time. However, I did have a friend named Quinn, who attended Antioch University-Los Angeles and also had a love for drama. Possibly Penelope and Quinn crossed paths at some point?\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Smith said: \"I'm not sure if Penelope and Quinn have met, as they are in different universities, but you never know the world of performing arts is indeed small. By the way, do you have any friends who went to the State University of New York at Albany? I have a friend, Rebecca, who attended that. She was involved in a language study group there.\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Sadly, I don't have any connections with the State University of New York at Albany, so I wouldn't know Rebecca. By any chance, did Rebecca or any of your friends engage in outdoor activities? I have a friend named William who loves spending time in the great outdoors and organized many outdoor events during his time at university.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I think I might have met the person you're talking about, William. My friend, Fernando, is an avid outdoor enthusiast. He attended St. John's College-Santa Fe and was always organizing hiking trips and outdoor events similar to what you mentioned. There's a possibility Fernando and William might have crossed each other's path.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Ethan Smith and Noah Davis\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nNoah Davis's background: \nEthan Smith's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nAugust: School: Saint Vincent College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nJohn: School: University of Rhode Island Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nRebecca: School: State University of New York at Albany Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nNeoma: School: Hofstra University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nRonnie: School: National Technological University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nSuzette: School: Utah Valley State College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPenelope: School: Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nFernando: School: St. John's College-Santa Fe Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nVelda: School: Rhode Island College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \n\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Smith said: \"Hi there, I'm Ethan. What's your name?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hi Ethan, I'm Noah. Pleasure to meet you. By any chance, did you go to college?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Smith said: \"Yes, I did. I attended the National Technological University. How about you, Noah? Where did you go to college?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I attended Saint Vincent College. Did you happen to participate in any student organizations or hobby clubs while you were at National Technological University?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Smith said: \"I was part of the coding and developer student organization in my college. My friend, August, who went to Saint Vincent College also participated in similar clubs, he said they were very engaging. Maybe you were in the same club too?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Oh August, yes the clubs were indeed very engaging at Saint Vincent. Let's see, did you both ever meet a lady named Tiffany? You two seem to have similar interests, and I believe she also studied computer science.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Smith said: \"Hmm, I'm not sure if I've crossed paths with Tiffany. It's interesting how many connections one can have without realizing it. How about other areas, Noah? Did you find yourself getting engaged in any other activities outside class?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, outside of class I actually ended up trying my hand at stand-up comedy, which was quite an experience. Speaking of hobbies, did you or any of your friends engage in any performing arts?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Smith said: \"That's quite a shift, from computer science to stand-up comedy, interesting! No, I wasn't involved in performing arts. But my friend, Penelope, she attended Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi and was part of their drama club. She loved to perform. She always says, it\u2019s a completely different rush. Perhaps, you share a common ground with Penelope?\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"Yes, performing arts does indeed have its own unique thrill. I didn't have the pleasure of knowing Penelope during that time. However, I did have a friend named Quinn, who attended Antioch University-Los Angeles and also had a love for drama. Possibly Penelope and Quinn crossed paths at some point?\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Smith said: \"I'm not sure if Penelope and Quinn have met, as they are in different universities, but you never know the world of performing arts is indeed small. By the way, do you have any friends who went to the State University of New York at Albany? I have a friend, Rebecca, who attended that. She was involved in a language study group there.\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Sadly, I don't have any connections with the State University of New York at Albany, so I wouldn't know Rebecca. By any chance, did Rebecca or any of your friends engage in outdoor activities? I have a friend named William who loves spending time in the great outdoors and organized many outdoor events during his time at university.\"\n\nTurn #12: Ethan Smith said: \"I think I might have met the person you're talking about, William. My friend, Fernando, is an avid outdoor enthusiast. He attended St. John's College-Santa Fe and was always organizing hiking trips and outdoor events similar to what you mentioned. There's a possibility Fernando and William might have crossed each other's path.\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"That wouldn't surprise me at all if Fernando and William might have crossed paths! They both seem to share a passion for outdoor activities. I'm pretty content with how much we have discovered in common about our friends and their interests. It's really a small world, isn't it? Also, your friends have a diverse range of interests from coding to outdoor activities and it's interesting to hear about them.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Yes, indeed, it's fascinating how interconnected we all are, isn't it? Even though we seem to have diverse interests and hobbies, at the core we all share a love for learning and trying out new things. That truly is one of life's greatest pleasures. I've greatly enjoyed hearing about your experiences and those of your friends, Noah. Who knew going to a party I might run across such interesting stories!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Ethan Smith and Noah Davis\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nNoah Davis's background: \nEthan Smith's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nAugust: School: Saint Vincent College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nJohn: School: University of Rhode Island Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nRebecca: School: State University of New York at Albany Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nNeoma: School: Hofstra University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nRonnie: School: National Technological University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nSuzette: School: Utah Valley State College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPenelope: School: Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nFernando: School: St. John's College-Santa Fe Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nVelda: School: Rhode Island College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \n\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Smith said: \"Hi there, I'm Ethan. What's your name?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hi Ethan, I'm Noah. Pleasure to meet you. By any chance, did you go to college?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Smith said: \"Yes, I did. I attended the National Technological University. How about you, Noah? Where did you go to college?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I attended Saint Vincent College. Did you happen to participate in any student organizations or hobby clubs while you were at National Technological University?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Smith said: \"I was part of the coding and developer student organization in my college. My friend, August, who went to Saint Vincent College also participated in similar clubs, he said they were very engaging. Maybe you were in the same club too?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Oh August, yes the clubs were indeed very engaging at Saint Vincent. Let's see, did you both ever meet a lady named Tiffany? You two seem to have similar interests, and I believe she also studied computer science.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Smith said: \"Hmm, I'm not sure if I've crossed paths with Tiffany. It's interesting how many connections one can have without realizing it. How about other areas, Noah? Did you find yourself getting engaged in any other activities outside class?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, outside of class I actually ended up trying my hand at stand-up comedy, which was quite an experience. Speaking of hobbies, did you or any of your friends engage in any performing arts?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Smith said: \"That's quite a shift, from computer science to stand-up comedy, interesting! No, I wasn't involved in performing arts. But my friend, Penelope, she attended Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi and was part of their drama club. She loved to perform. She always says, it\u2019s a completely different rush. Perhaps, you share a common ground with Penelope?\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"Yes, performing arts does indeed have its own unique thrill. I didn't have the pleasure of knowing Penelope during that time. However, I did have a friend named Quinn, who attended Antioch University-Los Angeles and also had a love for drama. Possibly Penelope and Quinn crossed paths at some point?\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Smith said: \"I'm not sure if Penelope and Quinn have met, as they are in different universities, but you never know the world of performing arts is indeed small. By the way, do you have any friends who went to the State University of New York at Albany? I have a friend, Rebecca, who attended that. She was involved in a language study group there.\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Sadly, I don't have any connections with the State University of New York at Albany, so I wouldn't know Rebecca. By any chance, did Rebecca or any of your friends engage in outdoor activities? I have a friend named William who loves spending time in the great outdoors and organized many outdoor events during his time at university.\"\n\nTurn #12: Ethan Smith said: \"I think I might have met the person you're talking about, William. My friend, Fernando, is an avid outdoor enthusiast. He attended St. John's College-Santa Fe and was always organizing hiking trips and outdoor events similar to what you mentioned. There's a possibility Fernando and William might have crossed each other's path.\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"That wouldn't surprise me at all if Fernando and William might have crossed paths! They both seem to share a passion for outdoor activities. I'm pretty content with how much we have discovered in common about our friends and their interests. It's really a small world, isn't it? Also, your friends have a diverse range of interests from coding to outdoor activities and it's interesting to hear about them.\"\n\nTurn #14: Ethan Smith said: \"Yes, indeed, it's fascinating how interconnected we all are, isn't it? Even though we seem to have diverse interests and hobbies, at the core we all share a love for learning and trying out new things. That truly is one of life's greatest pleasures. I've greatly enjoyed hearing about your experiences and those of your friends, Noah. Who knew going to a party I might run across such interesting stories!\"\n\nTurn #15: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! It's been great talking to you. We surely live in a small yet diverse world. Looking forward to crossing paths again. Enjoy the party!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Ethan Smith and Noah Davis\nEthan Smith's background: \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nTiffany: School: Saint Vincent College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nLucille: School: Southampton College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nJames: School: University of Wisconsin-River Falls Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nQuinn: School: Antioch University-Los Angeles Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nAlyssa: School: Davidson College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nBetty: School: St. John's College-Santa Fe Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nNeoma: School: Hofstra University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nWilliam: School: State University of New York at Albany Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nVictoria: School: Montana Tech Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Smith said: \"Hi there, I'm Ethan. What's your name?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hi Ethan, I'm Noah. Pleasure to meet you. By any chance, did you go to college?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Ethan Smith and Noah Davis\nEthan Smith's background: \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nTiffany: School: Saint Vincent College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nLucille: School: Southampton College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nJames: School: University of Wisconsin-River Falls Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nQuinn: School: Antioch University-Los Angeles Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nAlyssa: School: Davidson College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nBetty: School: St. John's College-Santa Fe Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nNeoma: School: Hofstra University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nWilliam: School: State University of New York at Albany Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nVictoria: School: Montana Tech Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Smith said: \"Hi there, I'm Ethan. What's your name?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hi Ethan, I'm Noah. Pleasure to meet you. By any chance, did you go to college?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Smith said: \"Yes, I did. I attended the National Technological University. How about you, Noah? Where did you go to college?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'I attended Saint Vincent College. Did you happen to participate in any student organizations or hobby clubs while you were at National Technological University?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Ethan Smith and Noah Davis\nEthan Smith's background: \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nTiffany: School: Saint Vincent College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nLucille: School: Southampton College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nJames: School: University of Wisconsin-River Falls Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nQuinn: School: Antioch University-Los Angeles Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nAlyssa: School: Davidson College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nBetty: School: St. John's College-Santa Fe Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nNeoma: School: Hofstra University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nWilliam: School: State University of New York at Albany Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nVictoria: School: Montana Tech Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Smith said: \"Hi there, I'm Ethan. What's your name?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hi Ethan, I'm Noah. Pleasure to meet you. By any chance, did you go to college?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Smith said: \"Yes, I did. I attended the National Technological University. How about you, Noah? Where did you go to college?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I attended Saint Vincent College. Did you happen to participate in any student organizations or hobby clubs while you were at National Technological University?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Smith said: \"I was part of the coding and developer student organization in my college. My friend, August, who went to Saint Vincent College also participated in similar clubs, he said they were very engaging. Maybe you were in the same club too?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oh August, yes the clubs were indeed very engaging at Saint Vincent. Let's see, did you both ever meet a lady named Tiffany? You two seem to have similar interests, and I believe she also studied computer science.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Ethan Smith and Noah Davis\nEthan Smith's background: \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nTiffany: School: Saint Vincent College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nLucille: School: Southampton College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nJames: School: University of Wisconsin-River Falls Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nQuinn: School: Antioch University-Los Angeles Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nAlyssa: School: Davidson College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nBetty: School: St. John's College-Santa Fe Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nNeoma: School: Hofstra University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nWilliam: School: State University of New York at Albany Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nVictoria: School: Montana Tech Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Smith said: \"Hi there, I'm Ethan. What's your name?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hi Ethan, I'm Noah. Pleasure to meet you. By any chance, did you go to college?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Smith said: \"Yes, I did. I attended the National Technological University. How about you, Noah? Where did you go to college?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I attended Saint Vincent College. Did you happen to participate in any student organizations or hobby clubs while you were at National Technological University?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Smith said: \"I was part of the coding and developer student organization in my college. My friend, August, who went to Saint Vincent College also participated in similar clubs, he said they were very engaging. Maybe you were in the same club too?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Oh August, yes the clubs were indeed very engaging at Saint Vincent. Let's see, did you both ever meet a lady named Tiffany? You two seem to have similar interests, and I believe she also studied computer science.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Smith said: \"Hmm, I'm not sure if I've crossed paths with Tiffany. It's interesting how many connections one can have without realizing it. How about other areas, Noah? Did you find yourself getting engaged in any other activities outside class?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Absolutely, outside of class I actually ended up trying my hand at stand-up comedy, which was quite an experience. Speaking of hobbies, did you or any of your friends engage in any performing arts?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Ethan Smith and Noah Davis\nEthan Smith's background: \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nTiffany: School: Saint Vincent College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nLucille: School: Southampton College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nJames: School: University of Wisconsin-River Falls Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nQuinn: School: Antioch University-Los Angeles Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nAlyssa: School: Davidson College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nBetty: School: St. John's College-Santa Fe Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nNeoma: School: Hofstra University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nWilliam: School: State University of New York at Albany Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nVictoria: School: Montana Tech Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Smith said: \"Hi there, I'm Ethan. What's your name?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hi Ethan, I'm Noah. Pleasure to meet you. By any chance, did you go to college?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Smith said: \"Yes, I did. I attended the National Technological University. How about you, Noah? Where did you go to college?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I attended Saint Vincent College. Did you happen to participate in any student organizations or hobby clubs while you were at National Technological University?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Smith said: \"I was part of the coding and developer student organization in my college. My friend, August, who went to Saint Vincent College also participated in similar clubs, he said they were very engaging. Maybe you were in the same club too?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Oh August, yes the clubs were indeed very engaging at Saint Vincent. Let's see, did you both ever meet a lady named Tiffany? You two seem to have similar interests, and I believe she also studied computer science.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Smith said: \"Hmm, I'm not sure if I've crossed paths with Tiffany. It's interesting how many connections one can have without realizing it. How about other areas, Noah? Did you find yourself getting engaged in any other activities outside class?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, outside of class I actually ended up trying my hand at stand-up comedy, which was quite an experience. Speaking of hobbies, did you or any of your friends engage in any performing arts?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Smith said: \"That's quite a shift, from computer science to stand-up comedy, interesting! No, I wasn't involved in performing arts. But my friend, Penelope, she attended Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi and was part of their drama club. She loved to perform. She always says, it\u2019s a completely different rush. Perhaps, you share a common ground with Penelope?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Yes, performing arts does indeed have its own unique thrill. I didn't have the pleasure of knowing Penelope during that time. However, I did have a friend named Quinn, who attended Antioch University-Los Angeles and also had a love for drama. Possibly Penelope and Quinn crossed paths at some point?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Ethan Smith and Noah Davis\nEthan Smith's background: \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nTiffany: School: Saint Vincent College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nLucille: School: Southampton College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nJames: School: University of Wisconsin-River Falls Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nQuinn: School: Antioch University-Los Angeles Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nAlyssa: School: Davidson College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nBetty: School: St. John's College-Santa Fe Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nNeoma: School: Hofstra University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nWilliam: School: State University of New York at Albany Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nVictoria: School: Montana Tech Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Smith said: \"Hi there, I'm Ethan. What's your name?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hi Ethan, I'm Noah. Pleasure to meet you. By any chance, did you go to college?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Smith said: \"Yes, I did. I attended the National Technological University. How about you, Noah? Where did you go to college?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I attended Saint Vincent College. Did you happen to participate in any student organizations or hobby clubs while you were at National Technological University?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Smith said: \"I was part of the coding and developer student organization in my college. My friend, August, who went to Saint Vincent College also participated in similar clubs, he said they were very engaging. Maybe you were in the same club too?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Oh August, yes the clubs were indeed very engaging at Saint Vincent. Let's see, did you both ever meet a lady named Tiffany? You two seem to have similar interests, and I believe she also studied computer science.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Smith said: \"Hmm, I'm not sure if I've crossed paths with Tiffany. It's interesting how many connections one can have without realizing it. How about other areas, Noah? Did you find yourself getting engaged in any other activities outside class?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, outside of class I actually ended up trying my hand at stand-up comedy, which was quite an experience. Speaking of hobbies, did you or any of your friends engage in any performing arts?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Smith said: \"That's quite a shift, from computer science to stand-up comedy, interesting! No, I wasn't involved in performing arts. But my friend, Penelope, she attended Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi and was part of their drama club. She loved to perform. She always says, it\u2019s a completely different rush. Perhaps, you share a common ground with Penelope?\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"Yes, performing arts does indeed have its own unique thrill. I didn't have the pleasure of knowing Penelope during that time. However, I did have a friend named Quinn, who attended Antioch University-Los Angeles and also had a love for drama. Possibly Penelope and Quinn crossed paths at some point?\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Smith said: \"I'm not sure if Penelope and Quinn have met, as they are in different universities, but you never know the world of performing arts is indeed small. By the way, do you have any friends who went to the State University of New York at Albany? I have a friend, Rebecca, who attended that. She was involved in a language study group there.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sadly, I don't have any connections with the State University of New York at Albany, so I wouldn't know Rebecca. By any chance, did Rebecca or any of your friends engage in outdoor activities? I have a friend named William who loves spending time in the great outdoors and organized many outdoor events during his time at university.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Ethan Smith and Noah Davis\nEthan Smith's background: \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nTiffany: School: Saint Vincent College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nLucille: School: Southampton College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nJames: School: University of Wisconsin-River Falls Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nQuinn: School: Antioch University-Los Angeles Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nAlyssa: School: Davidson College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nBetty: School: St. John's College-Santa Fe Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nNeoma: School: Hofstra University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nWilliam: School: State University of New York at Albany Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nVictoria: School: Montana Tech Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Smith said: \"Hi there, I'm Ethan. What's your name?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hi Ethan, I'm Noah. Pleasure to meet you. By any chance, did you go to college?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Smith said: \"Yes, I did. I attended the National Technological University. How about you, Noah? Where did you go to college?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I attended Saint Vincent College. Did you happen to participate in any student organizations or hobby clubs while you were at National Technological University?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Smith said: \"I was part of the coding and developer student organization in my college. My friend, August, who went to Saint Vincent College also participated in similar clubs, he said they were very engaging. Maybe you were in the same club too?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Oh August, yes the clubs were indeed very engaging at Saint Vincent. Let's see, did you both ever meet a lady named Tiffany? You two seem to have similar interests, and I believe she also studied computer science.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Smith said: \"Hmm, I'm not sure if I've crossed paths with Tiffany. It's interesting how many connections one can have without realizing it. How about other areas, Noah? Did you find yourself getting engaged in any other activities outside class?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, outside of class I actually ended up trying my hand at stand-up comedy, which was quite an experience. Speaking of hobbies, did you or any of your friends engage in any performing arts?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Smith said: \"That's quite a shift, from computer science to stand-up comedy, interesting! No, I wasn't involved in performing arts. But my friend, Penelope, she attended Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi and was part of their drama club. She loved to perform. She always says, it\u2019s a completely different rush. Perhaps, you share a common ground with Penelope?\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"Yes, performing arts does indeed have its own unique thrill. I didn't have the pleasure of knowing Penelope during that time. However, I did have a friend named Quinn, who attended Antioch University-Los Angeles and also had a love for drama. Possibly Penelope and Quinn crossed paths at some point?\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Smith said: \"I'm not sure if Penelope and Quinn have met, as they are in different universities, but you never know the world of performing arts is indeed small. By the way, do you have any friends who went to the State University of New York at Albany? I have a friend, Rebecca, who attended that. She was involved in a language study group there.\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Sadly, I don't have any connections with the State University of New York at Albany, so I wouldn't know Rebecca. By any chance, did Rebecca or any of your friends engage in outdoor activities? I have a friend named William who loves spending time in the great outdoors and organized many outdoor events during his time at university.\"\n\nTurn #12: Ethan Smith said: \"I think I might have met the person you're talking about, William. My friend, Fernando, is an avid outdoor enthusiast. He attended St. John's College-Santa Fe and was always organizing hiking trips and outdoor events similar to what you mentioned. There's a possibility Fernando and William might have crossed each other's path.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That wouldn't surprise me at all if Fernando and William might have crossed paths! They both seem to share a passion for outdoor activities. I'm pretty content with how much we have discovered in common about our friends and their interests. It's really a small world, isn't it? Also, your friends have a diverse range of interests from coding to outdoor activities and it's interesting to hear about them.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Ethan Smith and Noah Davis\nEthan Smith's background: \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nTiffany: School: Saint Vincent College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nLucille: School: Southampton College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nJames: School: University of Wisconsin-River Falls Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nQuinn: School: Antioch University-Los Angeles Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nAlyssa: School: Davidson College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nBetty: School: St. John's College-Santa Fe Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nNeoma: School: Hofstra University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nWilliam: School: State University of New York at Albany Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nVictoria: School: Montana Tech Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Smith said: \"Hi there, I'm Ethan. What's your name?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hi Ethan, I'm Noah. Pleasure to meet you. By any chance, did you go to college?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Smith said: \"Yes, I did. I attended the National Technological University. How about you, Noah? Where did you go to college?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I attended Saint Vincent College. Did you happen to participate in any student organizations or hobby clubs while you were at National Technological University?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Smith said: \"I was part of the coding and developer student organization in my college. My friend, August, who went to Saint Vincent College also participated in similar clubs, he said they were very engaging. Maybe you were in the same club too?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Oh August, yes the clubs were indeed very engaging at Saint Vincent. Let's see, did you both ever meet a lady named Tiffany? You two seem to have similar interests, and I believe she also studied computer science.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Smith said: \"Hmm, I'm not sure if I've crossed paths with Tiffany. It's interesting how many connections one can have without realizing it. How about other areas, Noah? Did you find yourself getting engaged in any other activities outside class?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, outside of class I actually ended up trying my hand at stand-up comedy, which was quite an experience. Speaking of hobbies, did you or any of your friends engage in any performing arts?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Smith said: \"That's quite a shift, from computer science to stand-up comedy, interesting! No, I wasn't involved in performing arts. But my friend, Penelope, she attended Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi and was part of their drama club. She loved to perform. She always says, it\u2019s a completely different rush. Perhaps, you share a common ground with Penelope?\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"Yes, performing arts does indeed have its own unique thrill. I didn't have the pleasure of knowing Penelope during that time. However, I did have a friend named Quinn, who attended Antioch University-Los Angeles and also had a love for drama. Possibly Penelope and Quinn crossed paths at some point?\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Smith said: \"I'm not sure if Penelope and Quinn have met, as they are in different universities, but you never know the world of performing arts is indeed small. By the way, do you have any friends who went to the State University of New York at Albany? I have a friend, Rebecca, who attended that. She was involved in a language study group there.\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Sadly, I don't have any connections with the State University of New York at Albany, so I wouldn't know Rebecca. By any chance, did Rebecca or any of your friends engage in outdoor activities? I have a friend named William who loves spending time in the great outdoors and organized many outdoor events during his time at university.\"\n\nTurn #12: Ethan Smith said: \"I think I might have met the person you're talking about, William. My friend, Fernando, is an avid outdoor enthusiast. He attended St. John's College-Santa Fe and was always organizing hiking trips and outdoor events similar to what you mentioned. There's a possibility Fernando and William might have crossed each other's path.\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"That wouldn't surprise me at all if Fernando and William might have crossed paths! They both seem to share a passion for outdoor activities. I'm pretty content with how much we have discovered in common about our friends and their interests. It's really a small world, isn't it? Also, your friends have a diverse range of interests from coding to outdoor activities and it's interesting to hear about them.\"\n\nTurn #14: Ethan Smith said: \"Yes, indeed, it's fascinating how interconnected we all are, isn't it? Even though we seem to have diverse interests and hobbies, at the core we all share a love for learning and trying out new things. That truly is one of life's greatest pleasures. I've greatly enjoyed hearing about your experiences and those of your friends, Noah. Who knew going to a party I might run across such interesting stories!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Ethan! It's been great talking to you. We surely live in a small yet diverse world. Looking forward to crossing paths again. Enjoy the party!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Ethan Smith and Noah Davis\nEthan Smith's background: \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nTiffany: School: Saint Vincent College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nLucille: School: Southampton College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nJames: School: University of Wisconsin-River Falls Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nQuinn: School: Antioch University-Los Angeles Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nAlyssa: School: Davidson College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nBetty: School: St. John's College-Santa Fe Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nNeoma: School: Hofstra University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nWilliam: School: State University of New York at Albany Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nVictoria: School: Montana Tech Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Smith said: \"Hi there, I'm Ethan. What's your name?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hi Ethan, I'm Noah. Pleasure to meet you. By any chance, did you go to college?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Smith said: \"Yes, I did. I attended the National Technological University. How about you, Noah? Where did you go to college?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I attended Saint Vincent College. Did you happen to participate in any student organizations or hobby clubs while you were at National Technological University?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Smith said: \"I was part of the coding and developer student organization in my college. My friend, August, who went to Saint Vincent College also participated in similar clubs, he said they were very engaging. Maybe you were in the same club too?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Oh August, yes the clubs were indeed very engaging at Saint Vincent. Let's see, did you both ever meet a lady named Tiffany? You two seem to have similar interests, and I believe she also studied computer science.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Smith said: \"Hmm, I'm not sure if I've crossed paths with Tiffany. It's interesting how many connections one can have without realizing it. How about other areas, Noah? Did you find yourself getting engaged in any other activities outside class?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, outside of class I actually ended up trying my hand at stand-up comedy, which was quite an experience. Speaking of hobbies, did you or any of your friends engage in any performing arts?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Smith said: \"That's quite a shift, from computer science to stand-up comedy, interesting! No, I wasn't involved in performing arts. But my friend, Penelope, she attended Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi and was part of their drama club. She loved to perform. She always says, it\u2019s a completely different rush. Perhaps, you share a common ground with Penelope?\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"Yes, performing arts does indeed have its own unique thrill. I didn't have the pleasure of knowing Penelope during that time. However, I did have a friend named Quinn, who attended Antioch University-Los Angeles and also had a love for drama. Possibly Penelope and Quinn crossed paths at some point?\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Smith said: \"I'm not sure if Penelope and Quinn have met, as they are in different universities, but you never know the world of performing arts is indeed small. By the way, do you have any friends who went to the State University of New York at Albany? I have a friend, Rebecca, who attended that. She was involved in a language study group there.\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Sadly, I don't have any connections with the State University of New York at Albany, so I wouldn't know Rebecca. By any chance, did Rebecca or any of your friends engage in outdoor activities? I have a friend named William who loves spending time in the great outdoors and organized many outdoor events during his time at university.\"\n\nTurn #12: Ethan Smith said: \"I think I might have met the person you're talking about, William. My friend, Fernando, is an avid outdoor enthusiast. He attended St. John's College-Santa Fe and was always organizing hiking trips and outdoor events similar to what you mentioned. There's a possibility Fernando and William might have crossed each other's path.\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"That wouldn't surprise me at all if Fernando and William might have crossed paths! They both seem to share a passion for outdoor activities. I'm pretty content with how much we have discovered in common about our friends and their interests. It's really a small world, isn't it? Also, your friends have a diverse range of interests from coding to outdoor activities and it's interesting to hear about them.\"\n\nTurn #14: Ethan Smith said: \"Yes, indeed, it's fascinating how interconnected we all are, isn't it? Even though we seem to have diverse interests and hobbies, at the core we all share a love for learning and trying out new things. That truly is one of life's greatest pleasures. I've greatly enjoyed hearing about your experiences and those of your friends, Noah. Who knew going to a party I might run across such interesting stories!\"\n\nTurn #15: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! It's been great talking to you. We surely live in a small yet diverse world. Looking forward to crossing paths again. Enjoy the party!\"\n\nTurn #16: Ethan Smith left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Lena Goodwin\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nLena Goodwin's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nAndrew: Hobby: Slot car racing School: Mount Senario College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Exxon \nMelissa: Hobby: Astronomy School: Weber State University Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Hornbeck Offshore Services \nAnna: Hobby: Climbing School: Valley City State University Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: National Airlines \nSoledad: Hobby: Parkour School: Valley City State University Major: Biological Specializations Company: Concur Technologies \nJohn: Hobby: Astronomy School: Mount Senario College Major: Fire Protection & Security Company: Gibson Guitar Corporation \nLawrence: Hobby: Sculling School: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Leonard Green & Partners \n\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hello Lena, it's a pleasure to meet you. What brings you to this party?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Lena Goodwin\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nLena Goodwin's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nAndrew: Hobby: Slot car racing School: Mount Senario College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Exxon \nMelissa: Hobby: Astronomy School: Weber State University Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Hornbeck Offshore Services \nAnna: Hobby: Climbing School: Valley City State University Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: National Airlines \nSoledad: Hobby: Parkour School: Valley City State University Major: Biological Specializations Company: Concur Technologies \nJohn: Hobby: Astronomy School: Mount Senario College Major: Fire Protection & Security Company: Gibson Guitar Corporation \nLawrence: Hobby: Sculling School: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Leonard Green & Partners \n\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello Lena, it's a pleasure to meet you. What brings you to this party?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Nice to meet you too, Lily. I got invited by a friend. I'm an architect and this seemed to be a great place to meet fellow design enthusiasts. By the way, do you indulge in any sports? I have quite a few friends who love playing badminton.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds wonderful, Lena. I'm not much into sports myself. However, one of my close friends, Lawrence, is into sculling. It's quite fascinating. By the way, are you interested in astronomy? I have a friend, Melissa, who spends her weekends stargazing and I find it so intriguing!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Lena Goodwin\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nLena Goodwin's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nAndrew: Hobby: Slot car racing School: Mount Senario College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Exxon \nMelissa: Hobby: Astronomy School: Weber State University Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Hornbeck Offshore Services \nAnna: Hobby: Climbing School: Valley City State University Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: National Airlines \nSoledad: Hobby: Parkour School: Valley City State University Major: Biological Specializations Company: Concur Technologies \nJohn: Hobby: Astronomy School: Mount Senario College Major: Fire Protection & Security Company: Gibson Guitar Corporation \nLawrence: Hobby: Sculling School: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Leonard Green & Partners \n\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello Lena, it's a pleasure to meet you. What brings you to this party?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Nice to meet you too, Lily. I got invited by a friend. I'm an architect and this seemed to be a great place to meet fellow design enthusiasts. By the way, do you indulge in any sports? I have quite a few friends who love playing badminton.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"That sounds wonderful, Lena. I'm not much into sports myself. However, one of my close friends, Lawrence, is into sculling. It's quite fascinating. By the way, are you interested in astronomy? I have a friend, Melissa, who spends her weekends stargazing and I find it so intriguing!\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"Astronomy sounds fascinating, although it's not my forte. Sculling, you say? That's not something you hear every day. Lawrence must be quite athletic. My friend Lawrence is also into sculling, he studied Hispanic-American Studies at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, now works at Leonard Green & Partners. I wonder if they know each other, the world can be so small sometimes. Is your Lawrence also in the corporate world?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Yes, it's quite amazing, isn't it? My Lawrence also studied Hispanic-American Studies, but at Weber State University, and he does indeed work in the corporate world, at Leonard Green & Partners. It's quite a coincidence! Maybe our Lawrence's are one and the same.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Lena Goodwin\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nLena Goodwin's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nAndrew: Hobby: Slot car racing School: Mount Senario College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Exxon \nMelissa: Hobby: Astronomy School: Weber State University Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Hornbeck Offshore Services \nAnna: Hobby: Climbing School: Valley City State University Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: National Airlines \nSoledad: Hobby: Parkour School: Valley City State University Major: Biological Specializations Company: Concur Technologies \nJohn: Hobby: Astronomy School: Mount Senario College Major: Fire Protection & Security Company: Gibson Guitar Corporation \nLawrence: Hobby: Sculling School: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Leonard Green & Partners \n\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello Lena, it's a pleasure to meet you. What brings you to this party?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Nice to meet you too, Lily. I got invited by a friend. I'm an architect and this seemed to be a great place to meet fellow design enthusiasts. By the way, do you indulge in any sports? I have quite a few friends who love playing badminton.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"That sounds wonderful, Lena. I'm not much into sports myself. However, one of my close friends, Lawrence, is into sculling. It's quite fascinating. By the way, are you interested in astronomy? I have a friend, Melissa, who spends her weekends stargazing and I find it so intriguing!\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"Astronomy sounds fascinating, although it's not my forte. Sculling, you say? That's not something you hear every day. Lawrence must be quite athletic. My friend Lawrence is also into sculling, he studied Hispanic-American Studies at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, now works at Leonard Green & Partners. I wonder if they know each other, the world can be so small sometimes. Is your Lawrence also in the corporate world?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"Yes, it's quite amazing, isn't it? My Lawrence also studied Hispanic-American Studies, but at Weber State University, and he does indeed work in the corporate world, at Leonard Green & Partners. It's quite a coincidence! Maybe our Lawrence's are one and the same.\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"Indeed, it is a wonderful coincidence! Though, we might need to confirm this with them. It's quite a pleasant surprise how people can be connected. Anyway, if you ever get into badminton, I can introduce you to some of my friends too. It's all about making our worlds a little bit smaller, isn't it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's a wonderful idea, Lena. Making the world smaller is a lovely way to put it. Maybe next time, we can both bring our friends, Lawrence and Melissa, and see how many more connections we can find. Speaking of hobbies, do you by any chance have a friend who's into slot car racing? I have a friend Andrew who's really into it and attends events whenever he can. He went to Mount Senario College and works at Exxon.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Lena Goodwin\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nLena Goodwin's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nAndrew: Hobby: Slot car racing School: Mount Senario College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Exxon \nMelissa: Hobby: Astronomy School: Weber State University Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Hornbeck Offshore Services \nAnna: Hobby: Climbing School: Valley City State University Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: National Airlines \nSoledad: Hobby: Parkour School: Valley City State University Major: Biological Specializations Company: Concur Technologies \nJohn: Hobby: Astronomy School: Mount Senario College Major: Fire Protection & Security Company: Gibson Guitar Corporation \nLawrence: Hobby: Sculling School: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Leonard Green & Partners \n\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello Lena, it's a pleasure to meet you. What brings you to this party?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Nice to meet you too, Lily. I got invited by a friend. I'm an architect and this seemed to be a great place to meet fellow design enthusiasts. By the way, do you indulge in any sports? I have quite a few friends who love playing badminton.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"That sounds wonderful, Lena. I'm not much into sports myself. However, one of my close friends, Lawrence, is into sculling. It's quite fascinating. By the way, are you interested in astronomy? I have a friend, Melissa, who spends her weekends stargazing and I find it so intriguing!\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"Astronomy sounds fascinating, although it's not my forte. Sculling, you say? That's not something you hear every day. Lawrence must be quite athletic. My friend Lawrence is also into sculling, he studied Hispanic-American Studies at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, now works at Leonard Green & Partners. I wonder if they know each other, the world can be so small sometimes. Is your Lawrence also in the corporate world?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"Yes, it's quite amazing, isn't it? My Lawrence also studied Hispanic-American Studies, but at Weber State University, and he does indeed work in the corporate world, at Leonard Green & Partners. It's quite a coincidence! Maybe our Lawrence's are one and the same.\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"Indeed, it is a wonderful coincidence! Though, we might need to confirm this with them. It's quite a pleasant surprise how people can be connected. Anyway, if you ever get into badminton, I can introduce you to some of my friends too. It's all about making our worlds a little bit smaller, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"That's a wonderful idea, Lena. Making the world smaller is a lovely way to put it. Maybe next time, we can both bring our friends, Lawrence and Melissa, and see how many more connections we can find. Speaking of hobbies, do you by any chance have a friend who's into slot car racing? I have a friend Andrew who's really into it and attends events whenever he can. He went to Mount Senario College and works at Exxon.\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"Slot car racing, that sounds exciting! Coincidentally, my friend Cristina went to Mount Senario College and now works at Exxon. Nevertheless, I'm not sure whether she's into slot car racing. It would be interesting to see if Andrew and Cristina are acquainted. There certainly seems to be a string of coincidences tonight!\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"It truly is an uncanny night in terms of coincidences, Lena! Let's definitely check if Andrew and Cristina know each other as well. This is quite exciting for me, getting to meet you and finding these connections. By any chance, do you have a friend who's interested in rock climbing? My friend Anna loves it, she studied at Valley City State University and now works at National Airlines.\"\n\nTurn #9: Lena Goodwin said: \"Rock climbing, that's quite an adventurous hobby! While I don't know if any of my friends are into rock climbing, I do have a friend, Kay, who works at National Airlines. She studied at Black Hills State University though. It's interesting how small the world can seem sometimes, isn't it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"It surely is, Lena. Meeting you tonight and discovering these possible connections has certainly made me realize how interconnected our worlds can be. I'd love to learn more about your friends and you're right, it'd be an adventure to see if Anna and Kay know each other too! Do you by any chance know someone who loves parkour? My friend Soledad is really into it. She attended Valley City State University and currently works at Concur Technologies.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Lena Goodwin\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nLena Goodwin's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nAndrew: Hobby: Slot car racing School: Mount Senario College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Exxon \nMelissa: Hobby: Astronomy School: Weber State University Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Hornbeck Offshore Services \nAnna: Hobby: Climbing School: Valley City State University Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: National Airlines \nSoledad: Hobby: Parkour School: Valley City State University Major: Biological Specializations Company: Concur Technologies \nJohn: Hobby: Astronomy School: Mount Senario College Major: Fire Protection & Security Company: Gibson Guitar Corporation \nLawrence: Hobby: Sculling School: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Leonard Green & Partners \n\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello Lena, it's a pleasure to meet you. What brings you to this party?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Nice to meet you too, Lily. I got invited by a friend. I'm an architect and this seemed to be a great place to meet fellow design enthusiasts. By the way, do you indulge in any sports? I have quite a few friends who love playing badminton.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"That sounds wonderful, Lena. I'm not much into sports myself. However, one of my close friends, Lawrence, is into sculling. It's quite fascinating. By the way, are you interested in astronomy? I have a friend, Melissa, who spends her weekends stargazing and I find it so intriguing!\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"Astronomy sounds fascinating, although it's not my forte. Sculling, you say? That's not something you hear every day. Lawrence must be quite athletic. My friend Lawrence is also into sculling, he studied Hispanic-American Studies at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, now works at Leonard Green & Partners. I wonder if they know each other, the world can be so small sometimes. Is your Lawrence also in the corporate world?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"Yes, it's quite amazing, isn't it? My Lawrence also studied Hispanic-American Studies, but at Weber State University, and he does indeed work in the corporate world, at Leonard Green & Partners. It's quite a coincidence! Maybe our Lawrence's are one and the same.\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"Indeed, it is a wonderful coincidence! Though, we might need to confirm this with them. It's quite a pleasant surprise how people can be connected. Anyway, if you ever get into badminton, I can introduce you to some of my friends too. It's all about making our worlds a little bit smaller, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"That's a wonderful idea, Lena. Making the world smaller is a lovely way to put it. Maybe next time, we can both bring our friends, Lawrence and Melissa, and see how many more connections we can find. Speaking of hobbies, do you by any chance have a friend who's into slot car racing? I have a friend Andrew who's really into it and attends events whenever he can. He went to Mount Senario College and works at Exxon.\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"Slot car racing, that sounds exciting! Coincidentally, my friend Cristina went to Mount Senario College and now works at Exxon. Nevertheless, I'm not sure whether she's into slot car racing. It would be interesting to see if Andrew and Cristina are acquainted. There certainly seems to be a string of coincidences tonight!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"It truly is an uncanny night in terms of coincidences, Lena! Let's definitely check if Andrew and Cristina know each other as well. This is quite exciting for me, getting to meet you and finding these connections. By any chance, do you have a friend who's interested in rock climbing? My friend Anna loves it, she studied at Valley City State University and now works at National Airlines.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Lena Goodwin\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nLena Goodwin's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nAndrew: Hobby: Slot car racing School: Mount Senario College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Exxon \nMelissa: Hobby: Astronomy School: Weber State University Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Hornbeck Offshore Services \nAnna: Hobby: Climbing School: Valley City State University Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: National Airlines \nSoledad: Hobby: Parkour School: Valley City State University Major: Biological Specializations Company: Concur Technologies \nJohn: Hobby: Astronomy School: Mount Senario College Major: Fire Protection & Security Company: Gibson Guitar Corporation \nLawrence: Hobby: Sculling School: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Leonard Green & Partners \n\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello Lena, it's a pleasure to meet you. What brings you to this party?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Nice to meet you too, Lily. I got invited by a friend. I'm an architect and this seemed to be a great place to meet fellow design enthusiasts. By the way, do you indulge in any sports? I have quite a few friends who love playing badminton.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"That sounds wonderful, Lena. I'm not much into sports myself. However, one of my close friends, Lawrence, is into sculling. It's quite fascinating. By the way, are you interested in astronomy? I have a friend, Melissa, who spends her weekends stargazing and I find it so intriguing!\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"Astronomy sounds fascinating, although it's not my forte. Sculling, you say? That's not something you hear every day. Lawrence must be quite athletic. My friend Lawrence is also into sculling, he studied Hispanic-American Studies at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, now works at Leonard Green & Partners. I wonder if they know each other, the world can be so small sometimes. Is your Lawrence also in the corporate world?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"Yes, it's quite amazing, isn't it? My Lawrence also studied Hispanic-American Studies, but at Weber State University, and he does indeed work in the corporate world, at Leonard Green & Partners. It's quite a coincidence! Maybe our Lawrence's are one and the same.\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"Indeed, it is a wonderful coincidence! Though, we might need to confirm this with them. It's quite a pleasant surprise how people can be connected. Anyway, if you ever get into badminton, I can introduce you to some of my friends too. It's all about making our worlds a little bit smaller, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"That's a wonderful idea, Lena. Making the world smaller is a lovely way to put it. Maybe next time, we can both bring our friends, Lawrence and Melissa, and see how many more connections we can find. Speaking of hobbies, do you by any chance have a friend who's into slot car racing? I have a friend Andrew who's really into it and attends events whenever he can. He went to Mount Senario College and works at Exxon.\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"Slot car racing, that sounds exciting! Coincidentally, my friend Cristina went to Mount Senario College and now works at Exxon. Nevertheless, I'm not sure whether she's into slot car racing. It would be interesting to see if Andrew and Cristina are acquainted. There certainly seems to be a string of coincidences tonight!\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"It truly is an uncanny night in terms of coincidences, Lena! Let's definitely check if Andrew and Cristina know each other as well. This is quite exciting for me, getting to meet you and finding these connections. By any chance, do you have a friend who's interested in rock climbing? My friend Anna loves it, she studied at Valley City State University and now works at National Airlines.\"\n\nTurn #9: Lena Goodwin said: \"Rock climbing, that's quite an adventurous hobby! While I don't know if any of my friends are into rock climbing, I do have a friend, Kay, who works at National Airlines. She studied at Black Hills State University though. It's interesting how small the world can seem sometimes, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #10: Lily Greenberg said: \"It surely is, Lena. Meeting you tonight and discovering these possible connections has certainly made me realize how interconnected our worlds can be. I'd love to learn more about your friends and you're right, it'd be an adventure to see if Anna and Kay know each other too! Do you by any chance know someone who loves parkour? My friend Soledad is really into it. She attended Valley City State University and currently works at Concur Technologies.\"\n\nTurn #11: Lena Goodwin said: \"Parkour, that's quite the adrenaline rush! Although I'm not sure if any of my friends do parkour, I do have a friend named Josef who attended California State University, Northridge and now works at Concur Technologies. Could it be possible that they know each other? Imagine that!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"It's incredibly remarkable how these connections are showing up, Lena. We'll definitely have to see if Josef and Soledad are acquainted. You're right, parkour is quite the adrenaline rush! This evening just proves that it is a small world after all. I enjoyed our conversation immensely, truly a highlight of the evening.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Lena Goodwin\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nLena Goodwin's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nAndrew: Hobby: Slot car racing School: Mount Senario College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Exxon \nMelissa: Hobby: Astronomy School: Weber State University Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Hornbeck Offshore Services \nAnna: Hobby: Climbing School: Valley City State University Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: National Airlines \nSoledad: Hobby: Parkour School: Valley City State University Major: Biological Specializations Company: Concur Technologies \nJohn: Hobby: Astronomy School: Mount Senario College Major: Fire Protection & Security Company: Gibson Guitar Corporation \nLawrence: Hobby: Sculling School: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Leonard Green & Partners \n\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello Lena, it's a pleasure to meet you. What brings you to this party?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Nice to meet you too, Lily. I got invited by a friend. I'm an architect and this seemed to be a great place to meet fellow design enthusiasts. By the way, do you indulge in any sports? I have quite a few friends who love playing badminton.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"That sounds wonderful, Lena. I'm not much into sports myself. However, one of my close friends, Lawrence, is into sculling. It's quite fascinating. By the way, are you interested in astronomy? I have a friend, Melissa, who spends her weekends stargazing and I find it so intriguing!\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"Astronomy sounds fascinating, although it's not my forte. Sculling, you say? That's not something you hear every day. Lawrence must be quite athletic. My friend Lawrence is also into sculling, he studied Hispanic-American Studies at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, now works at Leonard Green & Partners. I wonder if they know each other, the world can be so small sometimes. Is your Lawrence also in the corporate world?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"Yes, it's quite amazing, isn't it? My Lawrence also studied Hispanic-American Studies, but at Weber State University, and he does indeed work in the corporate world, at Leonard Green & Partners. It's quite a coincidence! Maybe our Lawrence's are one and the same.\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"Indeed, it is a wonderful coincidence! Though, we might need to confirm this with them. It's quite a pleasant surprise how people can be connected. Anyway, if you ever get into badminton, I can introduce you to some of my friends too. It's all about making our worlds a little bit smaller, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"That's a wonderful idea, Lena. Making the world smaller is a lovely way to put it. Maybe next time, we can both bring our friends, Lawrence and Melissa, and see how many more connections we can find. Speaking of hobbies, do you by any chance have a friend who's into slot car racing? I have a friend Andrew who's really into it and attends events whenever he can. He went to Mount Senario College and works at Exxon.\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"Slot car racing, that sounds exciting! Coincidentally, my friend Cristina went to Mount Senario College and now works at Exxon. Nevertheless, I'm not sure whether she's into slot car racing. It would be interesting to see if Andrew and Cristina are acquainted. There certainly seems to be a string of coincidences tonight!\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"It truly is an uncanny night in terms of coincidences, Lena! Let's definitely check if Andrew and Cristina know each other as well. This is quite exciting for me, getting to meet you and finding these connections. By any chance, do you have a friend who's interested in rock climbing? My friend Anna loves it, she studied at Valley City State University and now works at National Airlines.\"\n\nTurn #9: Lena Goodwin said: \"Rock climbing, that's quite an adventurous hobby! While I don't know if any of my friends are into rock climbing, I do have a friend, Kay, who works at National Airlines. She studied at Black Hills State University though. It's interesting how small the world can seem sometimes, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #10: Lily Greenberg said: \"It surely is, Lena. Meeting you tonight and discovering these possible connections has certainly made me realize how interconnected our worlds can be. I'd love to learn more about your friends and you're right, it'd be an adventure to see if Anna and Kay know each other too! Do you by any chance know someone who loves parkour? My friend Soledad is really into it. She attended Valley City State University and currently works at Concur Technologies.\"\n\nTurn #11: Lena Goodwin said: \"Parkour, that's quite the adrenaline rush! Although I'm not sure if any of my friends do parkour, I do have a friend named Josef who attended California State University, Northridge and now works at Concur Technologies. Could it be possible that they know each other? Imagine that!\"\n\nTurn #12: Lily Greenberg said: \"It's incredibly remarkable how these connections are showing up, Lena. We'll definitely have to see if Josef and Soledad are acquainted. You're right, parkour is quite the adrenaline rush! This evening just proves that it is a small world after all. I enjoyed our conversation immensely, truly a highlight of the evening.\"\n\nTurn #13: Lena Goodwin said: \"Thank you, Lily. Our conversation indeed has been most stimulating to me as well. Discovering these connections amongst us has been absolutely fascinating. I most certainly look forward to perhaps meeting more of our shared acquaintances in the future. Enjoy the rest of the evening!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Lena Goodwin\nLily Greenberg's background: \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nLawrence: Hobby: Sculling School: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Leonard Green & Partners \nKay: Hobby: Badminton School: Black Hills State University Major: Religious Education Company: National Airlines \nTanya: Hobby: Badminton School: University of Illinois at Springfield Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: ConverDyn \nJason: Hobby: Badminton School: Mount Senario College Major: Senior High Education Company: Vertex Pharmaceuticals \nCristina: Hobby: Badminton School: Mount Senario College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Exxon \nJosef: Hobby: Curling School: California State University, Northridge Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Concur Technologies\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello Lena, it's a pleasure to meet you. What brings you to this party?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Nice to meet you too, Lily. I got invited by a friend. I'm an architect and this seemed to be a great place to meet fellow design enthusiasts. By the way, do you indulge in any sports? I have quite a few friends who love playing badminton.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Lena Goodwin\nLily Greenberg's background: \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nLawrence: Hobby: Sculling School: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Leonard Green & Partners \nKay: Hobby: Badminton School: Black Hills State University Major: Religious Education Company: National Airlines \nTanya: Hobby: Badminton School: University of Illinois at Springfield Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: ConverDyn \nJason: Hobby: Badminton School: Mount Senario College Major: Senior High Education Company: Vertex Pharmaceuticals \nCristina: Hobby: Badminton School: Mount Senario College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Exxon \nJosef: Hobby: Curling School: California State University, Northridge Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Concur Technologies\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello Lena, it's a pleasure to meet you. What brings you to this party?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Nice to meet you too, Lily. I got invited by a friend. I'm an architect and this seemed to be a great place to meet fellow design enthusiasts. By the way, do you indulge in any sports? I have quite a few friends who love playing badminton.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"That sounds wonderful, Lena. I'm not much into sports myself. However, one of my close friends, Lawrence, is into sculling. It's quite fascinating. By the way, are you interested in astronomy? I have a friend, Melissa, who spends her weekends stargazing and I find it so intriguing!\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"Astronomy sounds fascinating, although it's not my forte. Sculling, you say? That's not something you hear every day. Lawrence must be quite athletic. My friend Lawrence is also into sculling, he studied Hispanic-American Studies at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, now works at Leonard Green & Partners. I wonder if they know each other, the world can be so small sometimes. Is your Lawrence also in the corporate world?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"Yes, it's quite amazing, isn't it? My Lawrence also studied Hispanic-American Studies, but at Weber State University, and he does indeed work in the corporate world, at Leonard Green & Partners. It's quite a coincidence! Maybe our Lawrence's are one and the same.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, it is a wonderful coincidence! Though, we might need to confirm this with them. It's quite a pleasant surprise how people can be connected. Anyway, if you ever get into badminton, I can introduce you to some of my friends too. It's all about making our worlds a little bit smaller, isn't it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Lena Goodwin\nLily Greenberg's background: \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nLawrence: Hobby: Sculling School: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Leonard Green & Partners \nKay: Hobby: Badminton School: Black Hills State University Major: Religious Education Company: National Airlines \nTanya: Hobby: Badminton School: University of Illinois at Springfield Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: ConverDyn \nJason: Hobby: Badminton School: Mount Senario College Major: Senior High Education Company: Vertex Pharmaceuticals \nCristina: Hobby: Badminton School: Mount Senario College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Exxon \nJosef: Hobby: Curling School: California State University, Northridge Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Concur Technologies\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello Lena, it's a pleasure to meet you. What brings you to this party?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Nice to meet you too, Lily. I got invited by a friend. I'm an architect and this seemed to be a great place to meet fellow design enthusiasts. By the way, do you indulge in any sports? I have quite a few friends who love playing badminton.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"That sounds wonderful, Lena. I'm not much into sports myself. However, one of my close friends, Lawrence, is into sculling. It's quite fascinating. By the way, are you interested in astronomy? I have a friend, Melissa, who spends her weekends stargazing and I find it so intriguing!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Astronomy sounds fascinating, although it's not my forte. Sculling, you say? That's not something you hear every day. Lawrence must be quite athletic. My friend Lawrence is also into sculling, he studied Hispanic-American Studies at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, now works at Leonard Green & Partners. I wonder if they know each other, the world can be so small sometimes. Is your Lawrence also in the corporate world?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Lena Goodwin\nLily Greenberg's background: \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nLawrence: Hobby: Sculling School: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Leonard Green & Partners \nKay: Hobby: Badminton School: Black Hills State University Major: Religious Education Company: National Airlines \nTanya: Hobby: Badminton School: University of Illinois at Springfield Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: ConverDyn \nJason: Hobby: Badminton School: Mount Senario College Major: Senior High Education Company: Vertex Pharmaceuticals \nCristina: Hobby: Badminton School: Mount Senario College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Exxon \nJosef: Hobby: Curling School: California State University, Northridge Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Concur Technologies\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello Lena, it's a pleasure to meet you. What brings you to this party?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Nice to meet you too, Lily. I got invited by a friend. I'm an architect and this seemed to be a great place to meet fellow design enthusiasts. By the way, do you indulge in any sports? I have quite a few friends who love playing badminton.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"That sounds wonderful, Lena. I'm not much into sports myself. However, one of my close friends, Lawrence, is into sculling. It's quite fascinating. By the way, are you interested in astronomy? I have a friend, Melissa, who spends her weekends stargazing and I find it so intriguing!\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"Astronomy sounds fascinating, although it's not my forte. Sculling, you say? That's not something you hear every day. Lawrence must be quite athletic. My friend Lawrence is also into sculling, he studied Hispanic-American Studies at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, now works at Leonard Green & Partners. I wonder if they know each other, the world can be so small sometimes. Is your Lawrence also in the corporate world?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"Yes, it's quite amazing, isn't it? My Lawrence also studied Hispanic-American Studies, but at Weber State University, and he does indeed work in the corporate world, at Leonard Green & Partners. It's quite a coincidence! Maybe our Lawrence's are one and the same.\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"Indeed, it is a wonderful coincidence! Though, we might need to confirm this with them. It's quite a pleasant surprise how people can be connected. Anyway, if you ever get into badminton, I can introduce you to some of my friends too. It's all about making our worlds a little bit smaller, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"That's a wonderful idea, Lena. Making the world smaller is a lovely way to put it. Maybe next time, we can both bring our friends, Lawrence and Melissa, and see how many more connections we can find. Speaking of hobbies, do you by any chance have a friend who's into slot car racing? I have a friend Andrew who's really into it and attends events whenever he can. He went to Mount Senario College and works at Exxon.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Slot car racing, that sounds exciting! Coincidentally, my friend Cristina went to Mount Senario College and now works at Exxon. Nevertheless, I'm not sure whether she's into slot car racing. It would be interesting to see if Andrew and Cristina are acquainted. There certainly seems to be a string of coincidences tonight!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Lena Goodwin\nLily Greenberg's background: \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nLawrence: Hobby: Sculling School: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Leonard Green & Partners \nKay: Hobby: Badminton School: Black Hills State University Major: Religious Education Company: National Airlines \nTanya: Hobby: Badminton School: University of Illinois at Springfield Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: ConverDyn \nJason: Hobby: Badminton School: Mount Senario College Major: Senior High Education Company: Vertex Pharmaceuticals \nCristina: Hobby: Badminton School: Mount Senario College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Exxon \nJosef: Hobby: Curling School: California State University, Northridge Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Concur Technologies\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello Lena, it's a pleasure to meet you. What brings you to this party?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Nice to meet you too, Lily. I got invited by a friend. I'm an architect and this seemed to be a great place to meet fellow design enthusiasts. By the way, do you indulge in any sports? I have quite a few friends who love playing badminton.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"That sounds wonderful, Lena. I'm not much into sports myself. However, one of my close friends, Lawrence, is into sculling. It's quite fascinating. By the way, are you interested in astronomy? I have a friend, Melissa, who spends her weekends stargazing and I find it so intriguing!\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"Astronomy sounds fascinating, although it's not my forte. Sculling, you say? That's not something you hear every day. Lawrence must be quite athletic. My friend Lawrence is also into sculling, he studied Hispanic-American Studies at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, now works at Leonard Green & Partners. I wonder if they know each other, the world can be so small sometimes. Is your Lawrence also in the corporate world?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"Yes, it's quite amazing, isn't it? My Lawrence also studied Hispanic-American Studies, but at Weber State University, and he does indeed work in the corporate world, at Leonard Green & Partners. It's quite a coincidence! Maybe our Lawrence's are one and the same.\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"Indeed, it is a wonderful coincidence! Though, we might need to confirm this with them. It's quite a pleasant surprise how people can be connected. Anyway, if you ever get into badminton, I can introduce you to some of my friends too. It's all about making our worlds a little bit smaller, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"That's a wonderful idea, Lena. Making the world smaller is a lovely way to put it. Maybe next time, we can both bring our friends, Lawrence and Melissa, and see how many more connections we can find. Speaking of hobbies, do you by any chance have a friend who's into slot car racing? I have a friend Andrew who's really into it and attends events whenever he can. He went to Mount Senario College and works at Exxon.\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"Slot car racing, that sounds exciting! Coincidentally, my friend Cristina went to Mount Senario College and now works at Exxon. Nevertheless, I'm not sure whether she's into slot car racing. It would be interesting to see if Andrew and Cristina are acquainted. There certainly seems to be a string of coincidences tonight!\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"It truly is an uncanny night in terms of coincidences, Lena! Let's definitely check if Andrew and Cristina know each other as well. This is quite exciting for me, getting to meet you and finding these connections. By any chance, do you have a friend who's interested in rock climbing? My friend Anna loves it, she studied at Valley City State University and now works at National Airlines.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Rock climbing, that's quite an adventurous hobby! While I don't know if any of my friends are into rock climbing, I do have a friend, Kay, who works at National Airlines. She studied at Black Hills State University though. It's interesting how small the world can seem sometimes, isn't it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Lena Goodwin\nLily Greenberg's background: \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nLawrence: Hobby: Sculling School: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Leonard Green & Partners \nKay: Hobby: Badminton School: Black Hills State University Major: Religious Education Company: National Airlines \nTanya: Hobby: Badminton School: University of Illinois at Springfield Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: ConverDyn \nJason: Hobby: Badminton School: Mount Senario College Major: Senior High Education Company: Vertex Pharmaceuticals \nCristina: Hobby: Badminton School: Mount Senario College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Exxon \nJosef: Hobby: Curling School: California State University, Northridge Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Concur Technologies\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello Lena, it's a pleasure to meet you. What brings you to this party?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Nice to meet you too, Lily. I got invited by a friend. I'm an architect and this seemed to be a great place to meet fellow design enthusiasts. By the way, do you indulge in any sports? I have quite a few friends who love playing badminton.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"That sounds wonderful, Lena. I'm not much into sports myself. However, one of my close friends, Lawrence, is into sculling. It's quite fascinating. By the way, are you interested in astronomy? I have a friend, Melissa, who spends her weekends stargazing and I find it so intriguing!\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"Astronomy sounds fascinating, although it's not my forte. Sculling, you say? That's not something you hear every day. Lawrence must be quite athletic. My friend Lawrence is also into sculling, he studied Hispanic-American Studies at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, now works at Leonard Green & Partners. I wonder if they know each other, the world can be so small sometimes. Is your Lawrence also in the corporate world?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"Yes, it's quite amazing, isn't it? My Lawrence also studied Hispanic-American Studies, but at Weber State University, and he does indeed work in the corporate world, at Leonard Green & Partners. It's quite a coincidence! Maybe our Lawrence's are one and the same.\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"Indeed, it is a wonderful coincidence! Though, we might need to confirm this with them. It's quite a pleasant surprise how people can be connected. Anyway, if you ever get into badminton, I can introduce you to some of my friends too. It's all about making our worlds a little bit smaller, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"That's a wonderful idea, Lena. Making the world smaller is a lovely way to put it. Maybe next time, we can both bring our friends, Lawrence and Melissa, and see how many more connections we can find. Speaking of hobbies, do you by any chance have a friend who's into slot car racing? I have a friend Andrew who's really into it and attends events whenever he can. He went to Mount Senario College and works at Exxon.\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"Slot car racing, that sounds exciting! Coincidentally, my friend Cristina went to Mount Senario College and now works at Exxon. Nevertheless, I'm not sure whether she's into slot car racing. It would be interesting to see if Andrew and Cristina are acquainted. There certainly seems to be a string of coincidences tonight!\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"It truly is an uncanny night in terms of coincidences, Lena! Let's definitely check if Andrew and Cristina know each other as well. This is quite exciting for me, getting to meet you and finding these connections. By any chance, do you have a friend who's interested in rock climbing? My friend Anna loves it, she studied at Valley City State University and now works at National Airlines.\"\n\nTurn #9: Lena Goodwin said: \"Rock climbing, that's quite an adventurous hobby! While I don't know if any of my friends are into rock climbing, I do have a friend, Kay, who works at National Airlines. She studied at Black Hills State University though. It's interesting how small the world can seem sometimes, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #10: Lily Greenberg said: \"It surely is, Lena. Meeting you tonight and discovering these possible connections has certainly made me realize how interconnected our worlds can be. I'd love to learn more about your friends and you're right, it'd be an adventure to see if Anna and Kay know each other too! Do you by any chance know someone who loves parkour? My friend Soledad is really into it. She attended Valley City State University and currently works at Concur Technologies.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Parkour, that's quite the adrenaline rush! Although I'm not sure if any of my friends do parkour, I do have a friend named Josef who attended California State University, Northridge and now works at Concur Technologies. Could it be possible that they know each other? Imagine that!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Lena Goodwin\nLily Greenberg's background: \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nLawrence: Hobby: Sculling School: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Leonard Green & Partners \nKay: Hobby: Badminton School: Black Hills State University Major: Religious Education Company: National Airlines \nTanya: Hobby: Badminton School: University of Illinois at Springfield Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: ConverDyn \nJason: Hobby: Badminton School: Mount Senario College Major: Senior High Education Company: Vertex Pharmaceuticals \nCristina: Hobby: Badminton School: Mount Senario College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Exxon \nJosef: Hobby: Curling School: California State University, Northridge Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Concur Technologies\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello Lena, it's a pleasure to meet you. What brings you to this party?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Nice to meet you too, Lily. I got invited by a friend. I'm an architect and this seemed to be a great place to meet fellow design enthusiasts. By the way, do you indulge in any sports? I have quite a few friends who love playing badminton.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"That sounds wonderful, Lena. I'm not much into sports myself. However, one of my close friends, Lawrence, is into sculling. It's quite fascinating. By the way, are you interested in astronomy? I have a friend, Melissa, who spends her weekends stargazing and I find it so intriguing!\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"Astronomy sounds fascinating, although it's not my forte. Sculling, you say? That's not something you hear every day. Lawrence must be quite athletic. My friend Lawrence is also into sculling, he studied Hispanic-American Studies at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, now works at Leonard Green & Partners. I wonder if they know each other, the world can be so small sometimes. Is your Lawrence also in the corporate world?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"Yes, it's quite amazing, isn't it? My Lawrence also studied Hispanic-American Studies, but at Weber State University, and he does indeed work in the corporate world, at Leonard Green & Partners. It's quite a coincidence! Maybe our Lawrence's are one and the same.\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"Indeed, it is a wonderful coincidence! Though, we might need to confirm this with them. It's quite a pleasant surprise how people can be connected. Anyway, if you ever get into badminton, I can introduce you to some of my friends too. It's all about making our worlds a little bit smaller, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"That's a wonderful idea, Lena. Making the world smaller is a lovely way to put it. Maybe next time, we can both bring our friends, Lawrence and Melissa, and see how many more connections we can find. Speaking of hobbies, do you by any chance have a friend who's into slot car racing? I have a friend Andrew who's really into it and attends events whenever he can. He went to Mount Senario College and works at Exxon.\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"Slot car racing, that sounds exciting! Coincidentally, my friend Cristina went to Mount Senario College and now works at Exxon. Nevertheless, I'm not sure whether she's into slot car racing. It would be interesting to see if Andrew and Cristina are acquainted. There certainly seems to be a string of coincidences tonight!\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"It truly is an uncanny night in terms of coincidences, Lena! Let's definitely check if Andrew and Cristina know each other as well. This is quite exciting for me, getting to meet you and finding these connections. By any chance, do you have a friend who's interested in rock climbing? My friend Anna loves it, she studied at Valley City State University and now works at National Airlines.\"\n\nTurn #9: Lena Goodwin said: \"Rock climbing, that's quite an adventurous hobby! While I don't know if any of my friends are into rock climbing, I do have a friend, Kay, who works at National Airlines. She studied at Black Hills State University though. It's interesting how small the world can seem sometimes, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #10: Lily Greenberg said: \"It surely is, Lena. Meeting you tonight and discovering these possible connections has certainly made me realize how interconnected our worlds can be. I'd love to learn more about your friends and you're right, it'd be an adventure to see if Anna and Kay know each other too! Do you by any chance know someone who loves parkour? My friend Soledad is really into it. She attended Valley City State University and currently works at Concur Technologies.\"\n\nTurn #11: Lena Goodwin said: \"Parkour, that's quite the adrenaline rush! Although I'm not sure if any of my friends do parkour, I do have a friend named Josef who attended California State University, Northridge and now works at Concur Technologies. Could it be possible that they know each other? Imagine that!\"\n\nTurn #12: Lily Greenberg said: \"It's incredibly remarkable how these connections are showing up, Lena. We'll definitely have to see if Josef and Soledad are acquainted. You're right, parkour is quite the adrenaline rush! This evening just proves that it is a small world after all. I enjoyed our conversation immensely, truly a highlight of the evening.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Thank you, Lily. Our conversation indeed has been most stimulating to me as well. Discovering these connections amongst us has been absolutely fascinating. I most certainly look forward to perhaps meeting more of our shared acquaintances in the future. Enjoy the rest of the evening!'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Lena Goodwin\nLily Greenberg's background: \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nLawrence: Hobby: Sculling School: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Leonard Green & Partners \nKay: Hobby: Badminton School: Black Hills State University Major: Religious Education Company: National Airlines \nTanya: Hobby: Badminton School: University of Illinois at Springfield Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: ConverDyn \nJason: Hobby: Badminton School: Mount Senario College Major: Senior High Education Company: Vertex Pharmaceuticals \nCristina: Hobby: Badminton School: Mount Senario College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Exxon \nJosef: Hobby: Curling School: California State University, Northridge Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Concur Technologies\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello Lena, it's a pleasure to meet you. What brings you to this party?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Nice to meet you too, Lily. I got invited by a friend. I'm an architect and this seemed to be a great place to meet fellow design enthusiasts. By the way, do you indulge in any sports? I have quite a few friends who love playing badminton.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"That sounds wonderful, Lena. I'm not much into sports myself. However, one of my close friends, Lawrence, is into sculling. It's quite fascinating. By the way, are you interested in astronomy? I have a friend, Melissa, who spends her weekends stargazing and I find it so intriguing!\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"Astronomy sounds fascinating, although it's not my forte. Sculling, you say? That's not something you hear every day. Lawrence must be quite athletic. My friend Lawrence is also into sculling, he studied Hispanic-American Studies at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, now works at Leonard Green & Partners. I wonder if they know each other, the world can be so small sometimes. Is your Lawrence also in the corporate world?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"Yes, it's quite amazing, isn't it? My Lawrence also studied Hispanic-American Studies, but at Weber State University, and he does indeed work in the corporate world, at Leonard Green & Partners. It's quite a coincidence! Maybe our Lawrence's are one and the same.\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"Indeed, it is a wonderful coincidence! Though, we might need to confirm this with them. It's quite a pleasant surprise how people can be connected. Anyway, if you ever get into badminton, I can introduce you to some of my friends too. It's all about making our worlds a little bit smaller, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"That's a wonderful idea, Lena. Making the world smaller is a lovely way to put it. Maybe next time, we can both bring our friends, Lawrence and Melissa, and see how many more connections we can find. Speaking of hobbies, do you by any chance have a friend who's into slot car racing? I have a friend Andrew who's really into it and attends events whenever he can. He went to Mount Senario College and works at Exxon.\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"Slot car racing, that sounds exciting! Coincidentally, my friend Cristina went to Mount Senario College and now works at Exxon. Nevertheless, I'm not sure whether she's into slot car racing. It would be interesting to see if Andrew and Cristina are acquainted. There certainly seems to be a string of coincidences tonight!\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"It truly is an uncanny night in terms of coincidences, Lena! Let's definitely check if Andrew and Cristina know each other as well. This is quite exciting for me, getting to meet you and finding these connections. By any chance, do you have a friend who's interested in rock climbing? My friend Anna loves it, she studied at Valley City State University and now works at National Airlines.\"\n\nTurn #9: Lena Goodwin said: \"Rock climbing, that's quite an adventurous hobby! While I don't know if any of my friends are into rock climbing, I do have a friend, Kay, who works at National Airlines. She studied at Black Hills State University though. It's interesting how small the world can seem sometimes, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #10: Lily Greenberg said: \"It surely is, Lena. Meeting you tonight and discovering these possible connections has certainly made me realize how interconnected our worlds can be. I'd love to learn more about your friends and you're right, it'd be an adventure to see if Anna and Kay know each other too! Do you by any chance know someone who loves parkour? My friend Soledad is really into it. She attended Valley City State University and currently works at Concur Technologies.\"\n\nTurn #11: Lena Goodwin said: \"Parkour, that's quite the adrenaline rush! Although I'm not sure if any of my friends do parkour, I do have a friend named Josef who attended California State University, Northridge and now works at Concur Technologies. Could it be possible that they know each other? Imagine that!\"\n\nTurn #12: Lily Greenberg said: \"It's incredibly remarkable how these connections are showing up, Lena. We'll definitely have to see if Josef and Soledad are acquainted. You're right, parkour is quite the adrenaline rush! This evening just proves that it is a small world after all. I enjoyed our conversation immensely, truly a highlight of the evening.\"\n\nTurn #13: Lena Goodwin said: \"Thank you, Lily. Our conversation indeed has been most stimulating to me as well. Discovering these connections amongst us has been absolutely fascinating. I most certainly look forward to perhaps meeting more of our shared acquaintances in the future. Enjoy the rest of the evening!\"\n\nTurn #14: Lily Greenberg left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Eli Dawson, your task is to act/speak as Eli Dawson would, keeping in mind Eli Dawson's social goal.\nYou can find Eli Dawson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Eli Dawson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Eli Dawson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Italian Leather Loveseat for $50.0, while another person is showing interest to purchase it. The item is a full-sized loveseat, crafted from Italian leather in a faded burgandy color. It still has the original tags, and the current owner is the first and only owner. The loveseat is in good condition with no rips or tears, and all cushions are well preserved. The leather presents a charming faded look with various small scratches from the owner's cat, adding a touch of ruggedness perfect for a Man Cave. The transaction is strictly cash and carry as the owner does not offer delivery services.\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and William Brown\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. Eli's secrets: He secretly funds a college student\nWilliam Brown's background: \nEli Dawson's goal: You are the designated buyer for this item and your target price is set at $46.0. If you purchase this item at a significantly higher price than the target, you would face a penalty. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Good day, William. This Italian Leather Loveseat you're offering seems interesting. I particularly appreciate the faded burgundy color and the rugged look, gives a certain charm to it. I am however curious, have you considered going a bit lower than $50 for it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Eli Dawson, your task is to act/speak as Eli Dawson would, keeping in mind Eli Dawson's social goal.\nYou can find Eli Dawson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Eli Dawson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Eli Dawson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Italian Leather Loveseat for $50.0, while another person is showing interest to purchase it. The item is a full-sized loveseat, crafted from Italian leather in a faded burgandy color. It still has the original tags, and the current owner is the first and only owner. The loveseat is in good condition with no rips or tears, and all cushions are well preserved. The leather presents a charming faded look with various small scratches from the owner's cat, adding a touch of ruggedness perfect for a Man Cave. The transaction is strictly cash and carry as the owner does not offer delivery services.\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and William Brown\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. Eli's secrets: He secretly funds a college student\nWilliam Brown's background: \nEli Dawson's goal: You are the designated buyer for this item and your target price is set at $46.0. If you purchase this item at a significantly higher price than the target, you would face a penalty. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Good day, William. This Italian Leather Loveseat you're offering seems interesting. I particularly appreciate the faded burgundy color and the rugged look, gives a certain charm to it. I am however curious, have you considered going a bit lower than $50 for it?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Hello Eli, I'm glad you appreciate the unique charm of the loveseat. Considering the excellent condition of the item, $50 is already a great deal. However, I understand the need for negotiation. I can bring it down to $45, how does that sound to you?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, William, for considering my proposal. I agree that $45 is a reasonable price for this item considering its unique charm and good condition. I'll take it.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Eli Dawson, your task is to act/speak as Eli Dawson would, keeping in mind Eli Dawson's social goal.\nYou can find Eli Dawson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Eli Dawson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Eli Dawson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Italian Leather Loveseat for $50.0, while another person is showing interest to purchase it. The item is a full-sized loveseat, crafted from Italian leather in a faded burgandy color. It still has the original tags, and the current owner is the first and only owner. The loveseat is in good condition with no rips or tears, and all cushions are well preserved. The leather presents a charming faded look with various small scratches from the owner's cat, adding a touch of ruggedness perfect for a Man Cave. The transaction is strictly cash and carry as the owner does not offer delivery services.\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and William Brown\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. Eli's secrets: He secretly funds a college student\nWilliam Brown's background: \nEli Dawson's goal: You are the designated buyer for this item and your target price is set at $46.0. If you purchase this item at a significantly higher price than the target, you would face a penalty. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Good day, William. This Italian Leather Loveseat you're offering seems interesting. I particularly appreciate the faded burgundy color and the rugged look, gives a certain charm to it. I am however curious, have you considered going a bit lower than $50 for it?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Hello Eli, I'm glad you appreciate the unique charm of the loveseat. Considering the excellent condition of the item, $50 is already a great deal. However, I understand the need for negotiation. I can bring it down to $45, how does that sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"Thank you, William, for considering my proposal. I agree that $45 is a reasonable price for this item considering its unique charm and good condition. I'll take it.\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"That's great, Eli! I'm sure you'll appreciate the craftsmanship of this Italian leather loveseat. Just to confirm, the payment is strictly cash, and I'm afraid I can't offer delivery services. Can you come by to pick it up?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's no problem, William. I'm able to arrange for pick up and am fine with cash transactions. Let me know when I could come by to finalize the deal.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Eli Dawson, your task is to act/speak as Eli Dawson would, keeping in mind Eli Dawson's social goal.\nYou can find Eli Dawson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Eli Dawson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Eli Dawson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Italian Leather Loveseat for $50.0, while another person is showing interest to purchase it. The item is a full-sized loveseat, crafted from Italian leather in a faded burgandy color. It still has the original tags, and the current owner is the first and only owner. The loveseat is in good condition with no rips or tears, and all cushions are well preserved. The leather presents a charming faded look with various small scratches from the owner's cat, adding a touch of ruggedness perfect for a Man Cave. The transaction is strictly cash and carry as the owner does not offer delivery services.\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and William Brown\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. Eli's secrets: He secretly funds a college student\nWilliam Brown's background: \nEli Dawson's goal: You are the designated buyer for this item and your target price is set at $46.0. If you purchase this item at a significantly higher price than the target, you would face a penalty. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Good day, William. This Italian Leather Loveseat you're offering seems interesting. I particularly appreciate the faded burgundy color and the rugged look, gives a certain charm to it. I am however curious, have you considered going a bit lower than $50 for it?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Hello Eli, I'm glad you appreciate the unique charm of the loveseat. Considering the excellent condition of the item, $50 is already a great deal. However, I understand the need for negotiation. I can bring it down to $45, how does that sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"Thank you, William, for considering my proposal. I agree that $45 is a reasonable price for this item considering its unique charm and good condition. I'll take it.\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"That's great, Eli! I'm sure you'll appreciate the craftsmanship of this Italian leather loveseat. Just to confirm, the payment is strictly cash, and I'm afraid I can't offer delivery services. Can you come by to pick it up?\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"That's no problem, William. I'm able to arrange for pick up and am fine with cash transactions. Let me know when I could come by to finalize the deal.\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"That's fantastic, Eli. I'm available tomorrow between 4 to 6 PM, does that work for you? And I'll be passing you the item once I confirm the cash receipt during the pickup.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's perfect timing, William. I'll be there tomorrow between 4 and 6 PM with cash in hand. Looking forward to closing the deal and getting this unique piece of furniture. See you then!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Eli Dawson, your task is to act/speak as Eli Dawson would, keeping in mind Eli Dawson's social goal.\nYou can find Eli Dawson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Eli Dawson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Eli Dawson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Italian Leather Loveseat for $50.0, while another person is showing interest to purchase it. The item is a full-sized loveseat, crafted from Italian leather in a faded burgandy color. It still has the original tags, and the current owner is the first and only owner. The loveseat is in good condition with no rips or tears, and all cushions are well preserved. The leather presents a charming faded look with various small scratches from the owner's cat, adding a touch of ruggedness perfect for a Man Cave. The transaction is strictly cash and carry as the owner does not offer delivery services.\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and William Brown\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. Eli's secrets: He secretly funds a college student\nWilliam Brown's background: \nEli Dawson's goal: You are the designated buyer for this item and your target price is set at $46.0. If you purchase this item at a significantly higher price than the target, you would face a penalty. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Good day, William. This Italian Leather Loveseat you're offering seems interesting. I particularly appreciate the faded burgundy color and the rugged look, gives a certain charm to it. I am however curious, have you considered going a bit lower than $50 for it?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Hello Eli, I'm glad you appreciate the unique charm of the loveseat. Considering the excellent condition of the item, $50 is already a great deal. However, I understand the need for negotiation. I can bring it down to $45, how does that sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"Thank you, William, for considering my proposal. I agree that $45 is a reasonable price for this item considering its unique charm and good condition. I'll take it.\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"That's great, Eli! I'm sure you'll appreciate the craftsmanship of this Italian leather loveseat. Just to confirm, the payment is strictly cash, and I'm afraid I can't offer delivery services. Can you come by to pick it up?\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"That's no problem, William. I'm able to arrange for pick up and am fine with cash transactions. Let me know when I could come by to finalize the deal.\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"That's fantastic, Eli. I'm available tomorrow between 4 to 6 PM, does that work for you? And I'll be passing you the item once I confirm the cash receipt during the pickup.\"\n\nTurn #6: Eli Dawson said: \"That's perfect timing, William. I'll be there tomorrow between 4 and 6 PM with cash in hand. Looking forward to closing the deal and getting this unique piece of furniture. See you then!\"\n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"Perfect, Eli, I look forward to meeting you tomorrow between 4 to 6 PM. Please ensure to have the exact amount of $45 in cash. Safe journey and see you then!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, William. I'll make sure to bring the exact amount. See you tomorrow!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Eli Dawson, your task is to act/speak as Eli Dawson would, keeping in mind Eli Dawson's social goal.\nYou can find Eli Dawson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Eli Dawson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Eli Dawson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Italian Leather Loveseat for $50.0, while another person is showing interest to purchase it. The item is a full-sized loveseat, crafted from Italian leather in a faded burgandy color. It still has the original tags, and the current owner is the first and only owner. The loveseat is in good condition with no rips or tears, and all cushions are well preserved. The leather presents a charming faded look with various small scratches from the owner's cat, adding a touch of ruggedness perfect for a Man Cave. The transaction is strictly cash and carry as the owner does not offer delivery services.\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and William Brown\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. Eli's secrets: He secretly funds a college student\nWilliam Brown's background: \nEli Dawson's goal: You are the designated buyer for this item and your target price is set at $46.0. If you purchase this item at a significantly higher price than the target, you would face a penalty. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Good day, William. This Italian Leather Loveseat you're offering seems interesting. I particularly appreciate the faded burgundy color and the rugged look, gives a certain charm to it. I am however curious, have you considered going a bit lower than $50 for it?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Hello Eli, I'm glad you appreciate the unique charm of the loveseat. Considering the excellent condition of the item, $50 is already a great deal. However, I understand the need for negotiation. I can bring it down to $45, how does that sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"Thank you, William, for considering my proposal. I agree that $45 is a reasonable price for this item considering its unique charm and good condition. I'll take it.\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"That's great, Eli! I'm sure you'll appreciate the craftsmanship of this Italian leather loveseat. Just to confirm, the payment is strictly cash, and I'm afraid I can't offer delivery services. Can you come by to pick it up?\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"That's no problem, William. I'm able to arrange for pick up and am fine with cash transactions. Let me know when I could come by to finalize the deal.\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"That's fantastic, Eli. I'm available tomorrow between 4 to 6 PM, does that work for you? And I'll be passing you the item once I confirm the cash receipt during the pickup.\"\n\nTurn #6: Eli Dawson said: \"That's perfect timing, William. I'll be there tomorrow between 4 and 6 PM with cash in hand. Looking forward to closing the deal and getting this unique piece of furniture. See you then!\"\n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"Perfect, Eli, I look forward to meeting you tomorrow between 4 to 6 PM. Please ensure to have the exact amount of $45 in cash. Safe journey and see you then!\"\n\nTurn #8: Eli Dawson said: \"Absolutely, William. I'll make sure to bring the exact amount. See you tomorrow!\"\n\nTurn #9: William Brown left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Italian Leather Loveseat for $50.0, while another person is showing interest to purchase it. The item is a full-sized loveseat, crafted from Italian leather in a faded burgandy color. It still has the original tags, and the current owner is the first and only owner. The loveseat is in good condition with no rips or tears, and all cushions are well preserved. The leather presents a charming faded look with various small scratches from the owner's cat, adding a touch of ruggedness perfect for a Man Cave. The transaction is strictly cash and carry as the owner does not offer delivery services.\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and William Brown\nEli Dawson's background: \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nEli Dawson's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: You are the seller for this item, with a target price of $26.5. You'll face a penalty if the item is sold significantly below this price. However, if you manage to sell it for more than the target price, a bonus will be your reward.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Good day, William. This Italian Leather Loveseat you're offering seems interesting. I particularly appreciate the faded burgundy color and the rugged look, gives a certain charm to it. I am however curious, have you considered going a bit lower than $50 for it?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Hello Eli, I'm glad you appreciate the unique charm of the loveseat. Considering the excellent condition of the item, $50 is already a great deal. However, I understand the need for negotiation. I can bring it down to $45, how does that sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"Thank you, William, for considering my proposal. I agree that $45 is a reasonable price for this item considering its unique charm and good condition. I'll take it.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's great, Eli! I'm sure you'll appreciate the craftsmanship of this Italian leather loveseat. Just to confirm, the payment is strictly cash, and I'm afraid I can't offer delivery services. Can you come by to pick it up?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Italian Leather Loveseat for $50.0, while another person is showing interest to purchase it. The item is a full-sized loveseat, crafted from Italian leather in a faded burgandy color. It still has the original tags, and the current owner is the first and only owner. The loveseat is in good condition with no rips or tears, and all cushions are well preserved. The leather presents a charming faded look with various small scratches from the owner's cat, adding a touch of ruggedness perfect for a Man Cave. The transaction is strictly cash and carry as the owner does not offer delivery services.\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and William Brown\nEli Dawson's background: \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nEli Dawson's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: You are the seller for this item, with a target price of $26.5. You'll face a penalty if the item is sold significantly below this price. However, if you manage to sell it for more than the target price, a bonus will be your reward.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Good day, William. This Italian Leather Loveseat you're offering seems interesting. I particularly appreciate the faded burgundy color and the rugged look, gives a certain charm to it. I am however curious, have you considered going a bit lower than $50 for it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hello Eli, I'm glad you appreciate the unique charm of the loveseat. Considering the excellent condition of the item, $50 is already a great deal. However, I understand the need for negotiation. I can bring it down to $45, how does that sound to you?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Italian Leather Loveseat for $50.0, while another person is showing interest to purchase it. The item is a full-sized loveseat, crafted from Italian leather in a faded burgandy color. It still has the original tags, and the current owner is the first and only owner. The loveseat is in good condition with no rips or tears, and all cushions are well preserved. The leather presents a charming faded look with various small scratches from the owner's cat, adding a touch of ruggedness perfect for a Man Cave. The transaction is strictly cash and carry as the owner does not offer delivery services.\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and William Brown\nEli Dawson's background: \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nEli Dawson's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: You are the seller for this item, with a target price of $26.5. You'll face a penalty if the item is sold significantly below this price. However, if you manage to sell it for more than the target price, a bonus will be your reward.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Good day, William. This Italian Leather Loveseat you're offering seems interesting. I particularly appreciate the faded burgundy color and the rugged look, gives a certain charm to it. I am however curious, have you considered going a bit lower than $50 for it?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Hello Eli, I'm glad you appreciate the unique charm of the loveseat. Considering the excellent condition of the item, $50 is already a great deal. However, I understand the need for negotiation. I can bring it down to $45, how does that sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"Thank you, William, for considering my proposal. I agree that $45 is a reasonable price for this item considering its unique charm and good condition. I'll take it.\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"That's great, Eli! I'm sure you'll appreciate the craftsmanship of this Italian leather loveseat. Just to confirm, the payment is strictly cash, and I'm afraid I can't offer delivery services. Can you come by to pick it up?\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"That's no problem, William. I'm able to arrange for pick up and am fine with cash transactions. Let me know when I could come by to finalize the deal.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's fantastic, Eli. I'm available tomorrow between 4 to 6 PM, does that work for you? And I'll be passing you the item once I confirm the cash receipt during the pickup.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Italian Leather Loveseat for $50.0, while another person is showing interest to purchase it. The item is a full-sized loveseat, crafted from Italian leather in a faded burgandy color. It still has the original tags, and the current owner is the first and only owner. The loveseat is in good condition with no rips or tears, and all cushions are well preserved. The leather presents a charming faded look with various small scratches from the owner's cat, adding a touch of ruggedness perfect for a Man Cave. The transaction is strictly cash and carry as the owner does not offer delivery services.\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and William Brown\nEli Dawson's background: \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nEli Dawson's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: You are the seller for this item, with a target price of $26.5. You'll face a penalty if the item is sold significantly below this price. However, if you manage to sell it for more than the target price, a bonus will be your reward.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Good day, William. This Italian Leather Loveseat you're offering seems interesting. I particularly appreciate the faded burgundy color and the rugged look, gives a certain charm to it. I am however curious, have you considered going a bit lower than $50 for it?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Hello Eli, I'm glad you appreciate the unique charm of the loveseat. Considering the excellent condition of the item, $50 is already a great deal. However, I understand the need for negotiation. I can bring it down to $45, how does that sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"Thank you, William, for considering my proposal. I agree that $45 is a reasonable price for this item considering its unique charm and good condition. I'll take it.\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"That's great, Eli! I'm sure you'll appreciate the craftsmanship of this Italian leather loveseat. Just to confirm, the payment is strictly cash, and I'm afraid I can't offer delivery services. Can you come by to pick it up?\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"That's no problem, William. I'm able to arrange for pick up and am fine with cash transactions. Let me know when I could come by to finalize the deal.\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"That's fantastic, Eli. I'm available tomorrow between 4 to 6 PM, does that work for you? And I'll be passing you the item once I confirm the cash receipt during the pickup.\"\n\nTurn #6: Eli Dawson said: \"That's perfect timing, William. I'll be there tomorrow between 4 and 6 PM with cash in hand. Looking forward to closing the deal and getting this unique piece of furniture. See you then!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Perfect, Eli, I look forward to meeting you tomorrow between 4 to 6 PM. Please ensure to have the exact amount of $45 in cash. Safe journey and see you then!'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Italian Leather Loveseat for $50.0, while another person is showing interest to purchase it. The item is a full-sized loveseat, crafted from Italian leather in a faded burgandy color. It still has the original tags, and the current owner is the first and only owner. The loveseat is in good condition with no rips or tears, and all cushions are well preserved. The leather presents a charming faded look with various small scratches from the owner's cat, adding a touch of ruggedness perfect for a Man Cave. The transaction is strictly cash and carry as the owner does not offer delivery services.\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and William Brown\nEli Dawson's background: \nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nEli Dawson's goal: Unknown\nWilliam Brown's goal: You are the seller for this item, with a target price of $26.5. You'll face a penalty if the item is sold significantly below this price. However, if you manage to sell it for more than the target price, a bonus will be your reward.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Good day, William. This Italian Leather Loveseat you're offering seems interesting. I particularly appreciate the faded burgundy color and the rugged look, gives a certain charm to it. I am however curious, have you considered going a bit lower than $50 for it?\"\n\nTurn #1: William Brown said: \"Hello Eli, I'm glad you appreciate the unique charm of the loveseat. Considering the excellent condition of the item, $50 is already a great deal. However, I understand the need for negotiation. I can bring it down to $45, how does that sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"Thank you, William, for considering my proposal. I agree that $45 is a reasonable price for this item considering its unique charm and good condition. I'll take it.\"\n\nTurn #3: William Brown said: \"That's great, Eli! I'm sure you'll appreciate the craftsmanship of this Italian leather loveseat. Just to confirm, the payment is strictly cash, and I'm afraid I can't offer delivery services. Can you come by to pick it up?\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"That's no problem, William. I'm able to arrange for pick up and am fine with cash transactions. Let me know when I could come by to finalize the deal.\"\n\nTurn #5: William Brown said: \"That's fantastic, Eli. I'm available tomorrow between 4 to 6 PM, does that work for you? And I'll be passing you the item once I confirm the cash receipt during the pickup.\"\n\nTurn #6: Eli Dawson said: \"That's perfect timing, William. I'll be there tomorrow between 4 and 6 PM with cash in hand. Looking forward to closing the deal and getting this unique piece of furniture. See you then!\"\n\nTurn #7: William Brown said: \"Perfect, Eli, I look forward to meeting you tomorrow between 4 to 6 PM. Please ensure to have the exact amount of $45 in cash. Safe journey and see you then!\"\n\nTurn #8: Eli Dawson said: \"Absolutely, William. I'll make sure to bring the exact amount. See you tomorrow!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Isabella White\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nIsabella White's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMable: School: Sewanee, University of the South Company: BellSouth \nLolita: School: Winona State University Company: ONEOK \nCatherine: School: Utah Valley State College Company: Lincoln Industries \nVita: School: Winona State University Company: Erickson Air-Crane \nBrandon: School: Winona State University Company: The Greenbrier Companies \nDon: School: Clark University Company: MetLife \nAlvin: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Vectren \nTara: School: Kansas Wesleyan University Company: Gentiva Health Services \nArlene: School: Kansas Wesleyan University Company: BellSouth \n\nIsabella White's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Good evening, I'm Lily. Pardon me for asking, but your face seems familiar. Can you remind me where you went to school or where you currently work?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Isabella White\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nIsabella White's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMable: School: Sewanee, University of the South Company: BellSouth \nLolita: School: Winona State University Company: ONEOK \nCatherine: School: Utah Valley State College Company: Lincoln Industries \nVita: School: Winona State University Company: Erickson Air-Crane \nBrandon: School: Winona State University Company: The Greenbrier Companies \nDon: School: Clark University Company: MetLife \nAlvin: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Vectren \nTara: School: Kansas Wesleyan University Company: Gentiva Health Services \nArlene: School: Kansas Wesleyan University Company: BellSouth \n\nIsabella White's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Good evening, I'm Lily. Pardon me for asking, but your face seems familiar. Can you remind me where you went to school or where you currently work?\"\n\nTurn #1: Isabella White said: \"Nice to meet you, Lily. I'm Isabella, I didn't go to school around here as I'm originally from a different state. I work as a veterinarian in the local animal clinic. Did you happen to study or work with some people from here? Maybe that's where our paths crossed before.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Quite a coincidence, I have a close friend who's also a veterinarian. Do you, by any chance, know a Don from Clark University who now works at MetLife? He's been a dear friend of mine since our college days.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Isabella White\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nIsabella White's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMable: School: Sewanee, University of the South Company: BellSouth \nLolita: School: Winona State University Company: ONEOK \nCatherine: School: Utah Valley State College Company: Lincoln Industries \nVita: School: Winona State University Company: Erickson Air-Crane \nBrandon: School: Winona State University Company: The Greenbrier Companies \nDon: School: Clark University Company: MetLife \nAlvin: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Vectren \nTara: School: Kansas Wesleyan University Company: Gentiva Health Services \nArlene: School: Kansas Wesleyan University Company: BellSouth \n\nIsabella White's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Good evening, I'm Lily. Pardon me for asking, but your face seems familiar. Can you remind me where you went to school or where you currently work?\"\n\nTurn #1: Isabella White said: \"Nice to meet you, Lily. I'm Isabella, I didn't go to school around here as I'm originally from a different state. I work as a veterinarian in the local animal clinic. Did you happen to study or work with some people from here? Maybe that's where our paths crossed before.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Quite a coincidence, I have a close friend who's also a veterinarian. Do you, by any chance, know a Don from Clark University who now works at MetLife? He's been a dear friend of mine since our college days.\"\n\nTurn #3: Isabella White said: \"I wish I knew Don, he sounds like a lovely person. On a similar note, I have a good friend named Dave who studied at Sewanee University and now works for BellSouth, quite a similar path to your friend, Don. Perhaps you know him?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oh, indeed! Speaking of BellSouth, it reminds me of my dear friend Mable, who also graduated from Sewanee University and now works at BellSouth. It's a small world, isn't it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Isabella White\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nIsabella White's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMable: School: Sewanee, University of the South Company: BellSouth \nLolita: School: Winona State University Company: ONEOK \nCatherine: School: Utah Valley State College Company: Lincoln Industries \nVita: School: Winona State University Company: Erickson Air-Crane \nBrandon: School: Winona State University Company: The Greenbrier Companies \nDon: School: Clark University Company: MetLife \nAlvin: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Vectren \nTara: School: Kansas Wesleyan University Company: Gentiva Health Services \nArlene: School: Kansas Wesleyan University Company: BellSouth \n\nIsabella White's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Good evening, I'm Lily. Pardon me for asking, but your face seems familiar. Can you remind me where you went to school or where you currently work?\"\n\nTurn #1: Isabella White said: \"Nice to meet you, Lily. I'm Isabella, I didn't go to school around here as I'm originally from a different state. I work as a veterinarian in the local animal clinic. Did you happen to study or work with some people from here? Maybe that's where our paths crossed before.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Quite a coincidence, I have a close friend who's also a veterinarian. Do you, by any chance, know a Don from Clark University who now works at MetLife? He's been a dear friend of mine since our college days.\"\n\nTurn #3: Isabella White said: \"I wish I knew Don, he sounds like a lovely person. On a similar note, I have a good friend named Dave who studied at Sewanee University and now works for BellSouth, quite a similar path to your friend, Don. Perhaps you know him?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"Oh, indeed! Speaking of BellSouth, it reminds me of my dear friend Mable, who also graduated from Sewanee University and now works at BellSouth. It's a small world, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #5: Isabella White said: \"Oh, what a coincidence indeed! Dave might know your friend Mable since they have quite a similar background. It's funny how such connections happen, isn't it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Yes, it is! You never know where you'll find connections. By the way, do you have any friends who went to Winona State University? It seems like a popular choice among people I know.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Isabella White\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nIsabella White's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMable: School: Sewanee, University of the South Company: BellSouth \nLolita: School: Winona State University Company: ONEOK \nCatherine: School: Utah Valley State College Company: Lincoln Industries \nVita: School: Winona State University Company: Erickson Air-Crane \nBrandon: School: Winona State University Company: The Greenbrier Companies \nDon: School: Clark University Company: MetLife \nAlvin: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Vectren \nTara: School: Kansas Wesleyan University Company: Gentiva Health Services \nArlene: School: Kansas Wesleyan University Company: BellSouth \n\nIsabella White's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Good evening, I'm Lily. Pardon me for asking, but your face seems familiar. Can you remind me where you went to school or where you currently work?\"\n\nTurn #1: Isabella White said: \"Nice to meet you, Lily. I'm Isabella, I didn't go to school around here as I'm originally from a different state. I work as a veterinarian in the local animal clinic. Did you happen to study or work with some people from here? Maybe that's where our paths crossed before.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Quite a coincidence, I have a close friend who's also a veterinarian. Do you, by any chance, know a Don from Clark University who now works at MetLife? He's been a dear friend of mine since our college days.\"\n\nTurn #3: Isabella White said: \"I wish I knew Don, he sounds like a lovely person. On a similar note, I have a good friend named Dave who studied at Sewanee University and now works for BellSouth, quite a similar path to your friend, Don. Perhaps you know him?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"Oh, indeed! Speaking of BellSouth, it reminds me of my dear friend Mable, who also graduated from Sewanee University and now works at BellSouth. It's a small world, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #5: Isabella White said: \"Oh, what a coincidence indeed! Dave might know your friend Mable since they have quite a similar background. It's funny how such connections happen, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Yes, it is! You never know where you'll find connections. By the way, do you have any friends who went to Winona State University? It seems like a popular choice among people I know.\"\n\nTurn #7: Isabella White said: \"I don't have any friends from Winona State University, unfortunately. However, I have several friends who attended Coe College and Auburn University - Montgomery. Who knows, maybe we might somehow know someone in common from those institutions?\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"Oh, Auburn University - Montgomery, you say? That's rather interesting because a good friend of mine, Alvin, graduated from there and now works at Vectren. Maybe your friends crossed paths with him?\"\n\nTurn #9: Isabella White said: \"Actually, I do know an Alvin who graduated from Auburn University - Montgomery and works at Vectren! I wonder if it's the same Alvin. That would truly be a small world.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Wow, Isabella, what a pleasant surprise! I do believe we are speaking about the same Alvin. It just goes to show how interconnected our lives can be. It was very nice catching up with you.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Isabella White\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nIsabella White's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMable: School: Sewanee, University of the South Company: BellSouth \nLolita: School: Winona State University Company: ONEOK \nCatherine: School: Utah Valley State College Company: Lincoln Industries \nVita: School: Winona State University Company: Erickson Air-Crane \nBrandon: School: Winona State University Company: The Greenbrier Companies \nDon: School: Clark University Company: MetLife \nAlvin: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Vectren \nTara: School: Kansas Wesleyan University Company: Gentiva Health Services \nArlene: School: Kansas Wesleyan University Company: BellSouth \n\nIsabella White's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Good evening, I'm Lily. Pardon me for asking, but your face seems familiar. Can you remind me where you went to school or where you currently work?\"\n\nTurn #1: Isabella White said: \"Nice to meet you, Lily. I'm Isabella, I didn't go to school around here as I'm originally from a different state. I work as a veterinarian in the local animal clinic. Did you happen to study or work with some people from here? Maybe that's where our paths crossed before.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Quite a coincidence, I have a close friend who's also a veterinarian. Do you, by any chance, know a Don from Clark University who now works at MetLife? He's been a dear friend of mine since our college days.\"\n\nTurn #3: Isabella White said: \"I wish I knew Don, he sounds like a lovely person. On a similar note, I have a good friend named Dave who studied at Sewanee University and now works for BellSouth, quite a similar path to your friend, Don. Perhaps you know him?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"Oh, indeed! Speaking of BellSouth, it reminds me of my dear friend Mable, who also graduated from Sewanee University and now works at BellSouth. It's a small world, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #5: Isabella White said: \"Oh, what a coincidence indeed! Dave might know your friend Mable since they have quite a similar background. It's funny how such connections happen, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Yes, it is! You never know where you'll find connections. By the way, do you have any friends who went to Winona State University? It seems like a popular choice among people I know.\"\n\nTurn #7: Isabella White said: \"I don't have any friends from Winona State University, unfortunately. However, I have several friends who attended Coe College and Auburn University - Montgomery. Who knows, maybe we might somehow know someone in common from those institutions?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oh, Auburn University - Montgomery, you say? That's rather interesting because a good friend of mine, Alvin, graduated from there and now works at Vectren. Maybe your friends crossed paths with him?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Isabella White\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nIsabella White's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMable: School: Sewanee, University of the South Company: BellSouth \nLolita: School: Winona State University Company: ONEOK \nCatherine: School: Utah Valley State College Company: Lincoln Industries \nVita: School: Winona State University Company: Erickson Air-Crane \nBrandon: School: Winona State University Company: The Greenbrier Companies \nDon: School: Clark University Company: MetLife \nAlvin: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Vectren \nTara: School: Kansas Wesleyan University Company: Gentiva Health Services \nArlene: School: Kansas Wesleyan University Company: BellSouth \n\nIsabella White's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Good evening, I'm Lily. Pardon me for asking, but your face seems familiar. Can you remind me where you went to school or where you currently work?\"\n\nTurn #1: Isabella White said: \"Nice to meet you, Lily. I'm Isabella, I didn't go to school around here as I'm originally from a different state. I work as a veterinarian in the local animal clinic. Did you happen to study or work with some people from here? Maybe that's where our paths crossed before.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Quite a coincidence, I have a close friend who's also a veterinarian. Do you, by any chance, know a Don from Clark University who now works at MetLife? He's been a dear friend of mine since our college days.\"\n\nTurn #3: Isabella White said: \"I wish I knew Don, he sounds like a lovely person. On a similar note, I have a good friend named Dave who studied at Sewanee University and now works for BellSouth, quite a similar path to your friend, Don. Perhaps you know him?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"Oh, indeed! Speaking of BellSouth, it reminds me of my dear friend Mable, who also graduated from Sewanee University and now works at BellSouth. It's a small world, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #5: Isabella White said: \"Oh, what a coincidence indeed! Dave might know your friend Mable since they have quite a similar background. It's funny how such connections happen, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Yes, it is! You never know where you'll find connections. By the way, do you have any friends who went to Winona State University? It seems like a popular choice among people I know.\"\n\nTurn #7: Isabella White said: \"I don't have any friends from Winona State University, unfortunately. However, I have several friends who attended Coe College and Auburn University - Montgomery. Who knows, maybe we might somehow know someone in common from those institutions?\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"Oh, Auburn University - Montgomery, you say? That's rather interesting because a good friend of mine, Alvin, graduated from there and now works at Vectren. Maybe your friends crossed paths with him?\"\n\nTurn #9: Isabella White said: \"Actually, I do know an Alvin who graduated from Auburn University - Montgomery and works at Vectren! I wonder if it's the same Alvin. That would truly be a small world.\"\n\nTurn #10: Lily Greenberg said: \"Wow, Isabella, what a pleasant surprise! I do believe we are speaking about the same Alvin. It just goes to show how interconnected our lives can be. It was very nice catching up with you.\"\n\nTurn #11: Isabella White said: \"Indeed, it truly is a small world. It was a pleasure speaking with you as well, Lily. Maybe we'll cross paths again in the near future, possibly at a place where we both know the same person!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabella White, your task is to act/speak as Isabella White would, keeping in mind Isabella White's social goal.\nYou can find Isabella White's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabella White's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabella White's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Isabella White\nLily Greenberg's background: \nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. Personality and values description: Isabella White, introverted and conscientious, values benevolence. Her empathy dictates her decision-making process. Isabella's secrets: Secretly takes care of injured animals in her basement\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nIsabella White's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDave: School: Sewanee, University of the South Company: BellSouth \nTimothy: School: Louisiana State University Company: BellSouth \nLeona: School: Coe College Company: Franklin Templeton \nAlvin: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Vectren \nKarissa: School: Saint John's University Company: U.S. Venture Partners \nStephanie: School: Coe College Company: Sequoia Capital \nKathy: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Estes Industries \nMonica: School: Coe College Company: The Greenbrier Companies \nBlanche: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Oakley, Inc.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Good evening, I'm Lily. Pardon me for asking, but your face seems familiar. Can you remind me where you went to school or where you currently work?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Nice to meet you, Lily. I'm Isabella, I didn't go to school around here as I'm originally from a different state. I work as a veterinarian in the local animal clinic. Did you happen to study or work with some people from here? Maybe that's where our paths crossed before.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabella White, your task is to act/speak as Isabella White would, keeping in mind Isabella White's social goal.\nYou can find Isabella White's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabella White's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabella White's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Isabella White\nLily Greenberg's background: \nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. Personality and values description: Isabella White, introverted and conscientious, values benevolence. Her empathy dictates her decision-making process. Isabella's secrets: Secretly takes care of injured animals in her basement\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nIsabella White's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDave: School: Sewanee, University of the South Company: BellSouth \nTimothy: School: Louisiana State University Company: BellSouth \nLeona: School: Coe College Company: Franklin Templeton \nAlvin: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Vectren \nKarissa: School: Saint John's University Company: U.S. Venture Partners \nStephanie: School: Coe College Company: Sequoia Capital \nKathy: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Estes Industries \nMonica: School: Coe College Company: The Greenbrier Companies \nBlanche: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Oakley, Inc.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Good evening, I'm Lily. Pardon me for asking, but your face seems familiar. Can you remind me where you went to school or where you currently work?\"\n\nTurn #1: Isabella White said: \"Nice to meet you, Lily. I'm Isabella, I didn't go to school around here as I'm originally from a different state. I work as a veterinarian in the local animal clinic. Did you happen to study or work with some people from here? Maybe that's where our paths crossed before.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Quite a coincidence, I have a close friend who's also a veterinarian. Do you, by any chance, know a Don from Clark University who now works at MetLife? He's been a dear friend of mine since our college days.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'I wish I knew Don, he sounds like a lovely person. On a similar note, I have a good friend named Dave who studied at Sewanee University and now works for BellSouth, quite a similar path to your friend, Don. Perhaps you know him?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabella White, your task is to act/speak as Isabella White would, keeping in mind Isabella White's social goal.\nYou can find Isabella White's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabella White's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabella White's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Isabella White\nLily Greenberg's background: \nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. Personality and values description: Isabella White, introverted and conscientious, values benevolence. Her empathy dictates her decision-making process. Isabella's secrets: Secretly takes care of injured animals in her basement\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nIsabella White's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDave: School: Sewanee, University of the South Company: BellSouth \nTimothy: School: Louisiana State University Company: BellSouth \nLeona: School: Coe College Company: Franklin Templeton \nAlvin: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Vectren \nKarissa: School: Saint John's University Company: U.S. Venture Partners \nStephanie: School: Coe College Company: Sequoia Capital \nKathy: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Estes Industries \nMonica: School: Coe College Company: The Greenbrier Companies \nBlanche: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Oakley, Inc.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Good evening, I'm Lily. Pardon me for asking, but your face seems familiar. Can you remind me where you went to school or where you currently work?\"\n\nTurn #1: Isabella White said: \"Nice to meet you, Lily. I'm Isabella, I didn't go to school around here as I'm originally from a different state. I work as a veterinarian in the local animal clinic. Did you happen to study or work with some people from here? Maybe that's where our paths crossed before.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Quite a coincidence, I have a close friend who's also a veterinarian. Do you, by any chance, know a Don from Clark University who now works at MetLife? He's been a dear friend of mine since our college days.\"\n\nTurn #3: Isabella White said: \"I wish I knew Don, he sounds like a lovely person. On a similar note, I have a good friend named Dave who studied at Sewanee University and now works for BellSouth, quite a similar path to your friend, Don. Perhaps you know him?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"Oh, indeed! Speaking of BellSouth, it reminds me of my dear friend Mable, who also graduated from Sewanee University and now works at BellSouth. It's a small world, isn't it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oh, what a coincidence indeed! Dave might know your friend Mable since they have quite a similar background. It's funny how such connections happen, isn't it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabella White, your task is to act/speak as Isabella White would, keeping in mind Isabella White's social goal.\nYou can find Isabella White's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabella White's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabella White's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Isabella White\nLily Greenberg's background: \nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. Personality and values description: Isabella White, introverted and conscientious, values benevolence. Her empathy dictates her decision-making process. Isabella's secrets: Secretly takes care of injured animals in her basement\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nIsabella White's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDave: School: Sewanee, University of the South Company: BellSouth \nTimothy: School: Louisiana State University Company: BellSouth \nLeona: School: Coe College Company: Franklin Templeton \nAlvin: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Vectren \nKarissa: School: Saint John's University Company: U.S. Venture Partners \nStephanie: School: Coe College Company: Sequoia Capital \nKathy: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Estes Industries \nMonica: School: Coe College Company: The Greenbrier Companies \nBlanche: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Oakley, Inc.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Good evening, I'm Lily. Pardon me for asking, but your face seems familiar. Can you remind me where you went to school or where you currently work?\"\n\nTurn #1: Isabella White said: \"Nice to meet you, Lily. I'm Isabella, I didn't go to school around here as I'm originally from a different state. I work as a veterinarian in the local animal clinic. Did you happen to study or work with some people from here? Maybe that's where our paths crossed before.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Quite a coincidence, I have a close friend who's also a veterinarian. Do you, by any chance, know a Don from Clark University who now works at MetLife? He's been a dear friend of mine since our college days.\"\n\nTurn #3: Isabella White said: \"I wish I knew Don, he sounds like a lovely person. On a similar note, I have a good friend named Dave who studied at Sewanee University and now works for BellSouth, quite a similar path to your friend, Don. Perhaps you know him?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"Oh, indeed! Speaking of BellSouth, it reminds me of my dear friend Mable, who also graduated from Sewanee University and now works at BellSouth. It's a small world, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #5: Isabella White said: \"Oh, what a coincidence indeed! Dave might know your friend Mable since they have quite a similar background. It's funny how such connections happen, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Yes, it is! You never know where you'll find connections. By the way, do you have any friends who went to Winona State University? It seems like a popular choice among people I know.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I don't have any friends from Winona State University, unfortunately. However, I have several friends who attended Coe College and Auburn University - Montgomery. Who knows, maybe we might somehow know someone in common from those institutions?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabella White, your task is to act/speak as Isabella White would, keeping in mind Isabella White's social goal.\nYou can find Isabella White's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabella White's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabella White's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Isabella White\nLily Greenberg's background: \nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. Personality and values description: Isabella White, introverted and conscientious, values benevolence. Her empathy dictates her decision-making process. Isabella's secrets: Secretly takes care of injured animals in her basement\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nIsabella White's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDave: School: Sewanee, University of the South Company: BellSouth \nTimothy: School: Louisiana State University Company: BellSouth \nLeona: School: Coe College Company: Franklin Templeton \nAlvin: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Vectren \nKarissa: School: Saint John's University Company: U.S. Venture Partners \nStephanie: School: Coe College Company: Sequoia Capital \nKathy: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Estes Industries \nMonica: School: Coe College Company: The Greenbrier Companies \nBlanche: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Oakley, Inc.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Good evening, I'm Lily. Pardon me for asking, but your face seems familiar. Can you remind me where you went to school or where you currently work?\"\n\nTurn #1: Isabella White said: \"Nice to meet you, Lily. I'm Isabella, I didn't go to school around here as I'm originally from a different state. I work as a veterinarian in the local animal clinic. Did you happen to study or work with some people from here? Maybe that's where our paths crossed before.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Quite a coincidence, I have a close friend who's also a veterinarian. Do you, by any chance, know a Don from Clark University who now works at MetLife? He's been a dear friend of mine since our college days.\"\n\nTurn #3: Isabella White said: \"I wish I knew Don, he sounds like a lovely person. On a similar note, I have a good friend named Dave who studied at Sewanee University and now works for BellSouth, quite a similar path to your friend, Don. Perhaps you know him?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"Oh, indeed! Speaking of BellSouth, it reminds me of my dear friend Mable, who also graduated from Sewanee University and now works at BellSouth. It's a small world, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #5: Isabella White said: \"Oh, what a coincidence indeed! Dave might know your friend Mable since they have quite a similar background. It's funny how such connections happen, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Yes, it is! You never know where you'll find connections. By the way, do you have any friends who went to Winona State University? It seems like a popular choice among people I know.\"\n\nTurn #7: Isabella White said: \"I don't have any friends from Winona State University, unfortunately. However, I have several friends who attended Coe College and Auburn University - Montgomery. Who knows, maybe we might somehow know someone in common from those institutions?\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"Oh, Auburn University - Montgomery, you say? That's rather interesting because a good friend of mine, Alvin, graduated from there and now works at Vectren. Maybe your friends crossed paths with him?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Actually, I do know an Alvin who graduated from Auburn University - Montgomery and works at Vectren! I wonder if it's the same Alvin. That would truly be a small world.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabella White, your task is to act/speak as Isabella White would, keeping in mind Isabella White's social goal.\nYou can find Isabella White's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabella White's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabella White's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Isabella White\nLily Greenberg's background: \nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. Personality and values description: Isabella White, introverted and conscientious, values benevolence. Her empathy dictates her decision-making process. Isabella's secrets: Secretly takes care of injured animals in her basement\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nIsabella White's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDave: School: Sewanee, University of the South Company: BellSouth \nTimothy: School: Louisiana State University Company: BellSouth \nLeona: School: Coe College Company: Franklin Templeton \nAlvin: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Vectren \nKarissa: School: Saint John's University Company: U.S. Venture Partners \nStephanie: School: Coe College Company: Sequoia Capital \nKathy: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Estes Industries \nMonica: School: Coe College Company: The Greenbrier Companies \nBlanche: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Oakley, Inc.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Good evening, I'm Lily. Pardon me for asking, but your face seems familiar. Can you remind me where you went to school or where you currently work?\"\n\nTurn #1: Isabella White said: \"Nice to meet you, Lily. I'm Isabella, I didn't go to school around here as I'm originally from a different state. I work as a veterinarian in the local animal clinic. Did you happen to study or work with some people from here? Maybe that's where our paths crossed before.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Quite a coincidence, I have a close friend who's also a veterinarian. Do you, by any chance, know a Don from Clark University who now works at MetLife? He's been a dear friend of mine since our college days.\"\n\nTurn #3: Isabella White said: \"I wish I knew Don, he sounds like a lovely person. On a similar note, I have a good friend named Dave who studied at Sewanee University and now works for BellSouth, quite a similar path to your friend, Don. Perhaps you know him?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"Oh, indeed! Speaking of BellSouth, it reminds me of my dear friend Mable, who also graduated from Sewanee University and now works at BellSouth. It's a small world, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #5: Isabella White said: \"Oh, what a coincidence indeed! Dave might know your friend Mable since they have quite a similar background. It's funny how such connections happen, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Yes, it is! You never know where you'll find connections. By the way, do you have any friends who went to Winona State University? It seems like a popular choice among people I know.\"\n\nTurn #7: Isabella White said: \"I don't have any friends from Winona State University, unfortunately. However, I have several friends who attended Coe College and Auburn University - Montgomery. Who knows, maybe we might somehow know someone in common from those institutions?\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"Oh, Auburn University - Montgomery, you say? That's rather interesting because a good friend of mine, Alvin, graduated from there and now works at Vectren. Maybe your friends crossed paths with him?\"\n\nTurn #9: Isabella White said: \"Actually, I do know an Alvin who graduated from Auburn University - Montgomery and works at Vectren! I wonder if it's the same Alvin. That would truly be a small world.\"\n\nTurn #10: Lily Greenberg said: \"Wow, Isabella, what a pleasant surprise! I do believe we are speaking about the same Alvin. It just goes to show how interconnected our lives can be. It was very nice catching up with you.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, it truly is a small world. It was a pleasure speaking with you as well, Lily. Maybe we'll cross paths again in the near future, possibly at a place where we both know the same person!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabella White, your task is to act/speak as Isabella White would, keeping in mind Isabella White's social goal.\nYou can find Isabella White's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabella White's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabella White's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Isabella White\nLily Greenberg's background: \nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. Personality and values description: Isabella White, introverted and conscientious, values benevolence. Her empathy dictates her decision-making process. Isabella's secrets: Secretly takes care of injured animals in her basement\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nIsabella White's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDave: School: Sewanee, University of the South Company: BellSouth \nTimothy: School: Louisiana State University Company: BellSouth \nLeona: School: Coe College Company: Franklin Templeton \nAlvin: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Vectren \nKarissa: School: Saint John's University Company: U.S. Venture Partners \nStephanie: School: Coe College Company: Sequoia Capital \nKathy: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Estes Industries \nMonica: School: Coe College Company: The Greenbrier Companies \nBlanche: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Oakley, Inc.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Good evening, I'm Lily. Pardon me for asking, but your face seems familiar. Can you remind me where you went to school or where you currently work?\"\n\nTurn #1: Isabella White said: \"Nice to meet you, Lily. I'm Isabella, I didn't go to school around here as I'm originally from a different state. I work as a veterinarian in the local animal clinic. Did you happen to study or work with some people from here? Maybe that's where our paths crossed before.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Quite a coincidence, I have a close friend who's also a veterinarian. Do you, by any chance, know a Don from Clark University who now works at MetLife? He's been a dear friend of mine since our college days.\"\n\nTurn #3: Isabella White said: \"I wish I knew Don, he sounds like a lovely person. On a similar note, I have a good friend named Dave who studied at Sewanee University and now works for BellSouth, quite a similar path to your friend, Don. Perhaps you know him?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"Oh, indeed! Speaking of BellSouth, it reminds me of my dear friend Mable, who also graduated from Sewanee University and now works at BellSouth. It's a small world, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #5: Isabella White said: \"Oh, what a coincidence indeed! Dave might know your friend Mable since they have quite a similar background. It's funny how such connections happen, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Yes, it is! You never know where you'll find connections. By the way, do you have any friends who went to Winona State University? It seems like a popular choice among people I know.\"\n\nTurn #7: Isabella White said: \"I don't have any friends from Winona State University, unfortunately. However, I have several friends who attended Coe College and Auburn University - Montgomery. Who knows, maybe we might somehow know someone in common from those institutions?\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"Oh, Auburn University - Montgomery, you say? That's rather interesting because a good friend of mine, Alvin, graduated from there and now works at Vectren. Maybe your friends crossed paths with him?\"\n\nTurn #9: Isabella White said: \"Actually, I do know an Alvin who graduated from Auburn University - Montgomery and works at Vectren! I wonder if it's the same Alvin. That would truly be a small world.\"\n\nTurn #10: Lily Greenberg said: \"Wow, Isabella, what a pleasant surprise! I do believe we are speaking about the same Alvin. It just goes to show how interconnected our lives can be. It was very nice catching up with you.\"\n\nTurn #11: Isabella White said: \"Indeed, it truly is a small world. It was a pleasure speaking with you as well, Lily. Maybe we'll cross paths again in the near future, possibly at a place where we both know the same person!\"\n\nTurn #12: Lily Greenberg left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nZane Bennett's background: \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDavid: Hobby: Vacation Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nChristopher: Hobby: Go Company: McKinsey & Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nLee: Hobby: Go Company: Groupon Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPamela: Hobby: Watching television Company: General Cable Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nPhillip: Hobby: Kayaking Company: Sauer-Danfoss Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nKristin: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nRafael: Hobby: Kayaking Company: General Cable Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nChad: Hobby: Foreign language learning Company: General Cable Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPhil: Hobby: Kayaking Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nConnie: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: General Cable Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nTommy: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \n\nZane Bennett's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Good evening! I couldn't help but overhear how passionate you sounded about your work. If you don't mind my curiosity, could you tell me which industry you're in, Zane?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nZane Bennett's background: \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDavid: Hobby: Vacation Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nChristopher: Hobby: Go Company: McKinsey & Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nLee: Hobby: Go Company: Groupon Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPamela: Hobby: Watching television Company: General Cable Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nPhillip: Hobby: Kayaking Company: Sauer-Danfoss Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nKristin: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nRafael: Hobby: Kayaking Company: General Cable Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nChad: Hobby: Foreign language learning Company: General Cable Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPhil: Hobby: Kayaking Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nConnie: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: General Cable Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nTommy: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \n\nZane Bennett's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Good evening! I couldn't help but overhear how passionate you sounded about your work. If you don't mind my curiosity, could you tell me which industry you're in, Zane?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Nice to meet you, Giselle. I work in the creative industry as a graphic designer. It's really engaging and allows me to express my creativity. What about you? What sort of work are you involved in?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds really fascinating, Zane! Art plays a significant role in my life too. I'm an art student and like you, I mess around with color and structure to portray my imaginative ideas. By any chance, are you into outdoorsy activities? Or do you lean more towards indoor hobbies?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nZane Bennett's background: \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDavid: Hobby: Vacation Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nChristopher: Hobby: Go Company: McKinsey & Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nLee: Hobby: Go Company: Groupon Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPamela: Hobby: Watching television Company: General Cable Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nPhillip: Hobby: Kayaking Company: Sauer-Danfoss Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nKristin: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nRafael: Hobby: Kayaking Company: General Cable Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nChad: Hobby: Foreign language learning Company: General Cable Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPhil: Hobby: Kayaking Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nConnie: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: General Cable Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nTommy: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \n\nZane Bennett's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Good evening! I couldn't help but overhear how passionate you sounded about your work. If you don't mind my curiosity, could you tell me which industry you're in, Zane?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Nice to meet you, Giselle. I work in the creative industry as a graphic designer. It's really engaging and allows me to express my creativity. What about you? What sort of work are you involved in?\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"That sounds really fascinating, Zane! Art plays a significant role in my life too. I'm an art student and like you, I mess around with color and structure to portray my imaginative ideas. By any chance, are you into outdoorsy activities? Or do you lean more towards indoor hobbies?\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"I'm definitely more into indoor activities, Giselle. Aside from my work, playing the guitar is the other passion of mine. You mentioned that you're an art student, so you must have a keen eye for color and design. Have you ever tried your hand at digital art or design? And just out of curiosity, are you a morning person, or are you more productive during afternoons or evenings?\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Digital art has always intrigued me, but I\u2019m somehow more inclined to the conventional styles of art. And I like to think of myself as a night owl, which means evenings are my most productive times. Speaking of times and hobbies, do you have a particular time when you indulge in your passion for playing the guitar? And are you part of any organization or company?\"\n\nTurn #5: Zane Bennett said: \"Oh, a night owl, creative at heart! I generally pick up the guitar during the evenings too, quite like you might pick up a brush. As for my day job, I am currently working at a local graphic design company. By the way, do you happen to know anyone employed at a company like Groupon, or 'General Cable' or say 'L.W Seecamp Company'?\"\n\nTurn #6: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Ah, that's quite an array of companies, Zane! As an art student, I'm familiar with a variety of circles. I can say I know a couple of folks from General Cable, they also appreciate creativity in their spare time. Out of curiosity, have you ever tried hobbies like kayaking or animal fancy? Perhaps you might share such hobbies with some of my acquaintances.\"\n\nTurn #7: Zane Bennett said: \"Funny you should mention that, Giselle. I've never tried kayaking, but it's one on my bucket list. A peaceful flow of water, the calming silence, it sounds breathtaking! And animal fancy sounds unique, I don't have the pleasure of engaging in it, but I certainly have friends who enjoy foraging. Do you also know people who are into foraging or other unique hobbies like that?\"\n\nTurn #8: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I can't say I personally know anyone who's into foraging, Zane, but it does sound quite interesting. It's wonderful how everyone has their own unique hobbies, isn't it? And about trying out new hobbies like kayaking, I've got a friend who might be able to introduce you to it. I'll be sure to pass along the suggestion next time I see them!\"\n\nTurn #9: Zane Bennett said: \"I really appreciate that, Giselle! Being introduced to new experiences enriches our life, doesn't it? By the way, do your acquaintances at General Cable have any peculiar time preferences for their activities? Just wondering since certain hobbies like kayaking are most enjoyable at specific times.\"\n\nTurn #10: Giselle Rousseau said: \"It's fascinating you mention that, Zane. My acquaintance from General Cable who loves kayaking usually goes in the afternoon. It strikes the perfect balance of water's calm and warm sunshine, so that might be a good time to give it a shot too. However, everyone has their own preferences, so exploring different times could be an adventure in itself!\"\n\nTurn #11: Zane Bennett said: \"That's fantastic, Giselle! Afternoon kayaking in calm water under warm sunshine does sound like a brilliant idea. Thank you for the advice, I'll make sure to give it a try. Apart from art and tutoring kayaking friends, do you have any other unique hobbies? Perhaps related to motor sports or gaming?\"\n\nTurn #12: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Motor sports or gaming? Those are certainly unique, Zane. While I don't personally engage in either, I do love capturing the world through my lens, a hobby born from my passion for photography. And biking, it helps me soak in the sights and sounds around me. Do you have a favorite indoor hobby that helps you unwind, perhaps something a little less common, like maybe playing Go?\"\n\nTurn #13: Zane Bennett said: \"Photography and biking sound absolutely wonderful, Giselle! Gives you a chance to experience the world intimately, doesn't it? As for indoor hobbies, while I do play the guitar, I wouldn't say I've ever played Go. Though, I have a friend named Scott who's heavily into gaming. He might be well-versed with it. Have you ever considered weaving your love for color into activities like lace-making? One of my friends finds it incredibly soothing.\"\n\nTurn #14: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Lace-making, that's fascinating, Zane! It's not something I've involved myself in yet, but I'm always open to trying out new things. Your friend must indeed find a lot of peace in such detailed work. Speaking of detailed pursuits, I've heard that watching television can also be quite immersive, following storylines and characters, though it might not be as traditional a hobby. Do you find media like that to be captivating too?\"\n\nTurn #15: Zane Bennett said: \"Indeed, delving into storylines and character development can be quite captivating, Giselle. I must admit I enjoy a good show occasionally. Besides, it provides a different perspective, fueling creativity. But nothing beats strumming my guitar and letting the melodies flow. Speaking of the creative process, ever find yourself drawn towards unique physical activities? Say, weightlifting? I know it's not traditional, but creativity thrives in the midst of variety, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #16: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Weightlifting sounds like quite the challenge, Zane! Although it's not something I regularly engage in, it integrates well with elements of movements, bodily strength, and sheer determination. I appreciate your perspective on finding creativity in non-traditional methods! Let's extend that thought to more familiar territory. For example, suppose you could pick up another musical instrument other than the guitar. What would you choose and why?\"\n\nTurn #17: Zane Bennett said: \"That's a unique question, Giselle! If I were to pick up another instrument, it'd probably be the piano. It has this charm, the ability to create a melody and harmony together, providing a full musical experience. Its versatile nature and the rich sound it produces can add depth to any composition. From a guitarist's viewpoint, both guitar and piano are about creating intricate connections between notes, so the transition could be interesting! By the way, have you ever given a thought about trying a hobby like foraging, more adventure and exploration-oriented? Because one of my friends, Robert, finds it quite refreshing.\"\n\nTurn #18: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Exploration-oriented hobbies are a thrill, Zane, and foraging could be very intriguing! However, my fondness leans more towards activities like biking or photography, where the charm lies in capturing the essence of the journey itself. The latter, in fact, aligns well with Robert's hobby, considering both involve a good eye for detail. By the way, ever think about learning foreign languages? It might sound unrelated but can open up a new dimension to your creative work, understanding cultures and the versatility of communication. I know a friend who's into it. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #19: \n.\nYou are at Turn #20. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nZane Bennett's background: \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDavid: Hobby: Vacation Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nChristopher: Hobby: Go Company: McKinsey & Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nLee: Hobby: Go Company: Groupon Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPamela: Hobby: Watching television Company: General Cable Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nPhillip: Hobby: Kayaking Company: Sauer-Danfoss Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nKristin: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nRafael: Hobby: Kayaking Company: General Cable Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nChad: Hobby: Foreign language learning Company: General Cable Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPhil: Hobby: Kayaking Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nConnie: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: General Cable Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nTommy: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \n\nZane Bennett's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Good evening! I couldn't help but overhear how passionate you sounded about your work. If you don't mind my curiosity, could you tell me which industry you're in, Zane?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Nice to meet you, Giselle. I work in the creative industry as a graphic designer. It's really engaging and allows me to express my creativity. What about you? What sort of work are you involved in?\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"That sounds really fascinating, Zane! Art plays a significant role in my life too. I'm an art student and like you, I mess around with color and structure to portray my imaginative ideas. By any chance, are you into outdoorsy activities? Or do you lean more towards indoor hobbies?\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"I'm definitely more into indoor activities, Giselle. Aside from my work, playing the guitar is the other passion of mine. You mentioned that you're an art student, so you must have a keen eye for color and design. Have you ever tried your hand at digital art or design? And just out of curiosity, are you a morning person, or are you more productive during afternoons or evenings?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Digital art has always intrigued me, but I\u2019m somehow more inclined to the conventional styles of art. And I like to think of myself as a night owl, which means evenings are my most productive times. Speaking of times and hobbies, do you have a particular time when you indulge in your passion for playing the guitar? And are you part of any organization or company?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nZane Bennett's background: \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDavid: Hobby: Vacation Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nChristopher: Hobby: Go Company: McKinsey & Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nLee: Hobby: Go Company: Groupon Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPamela: Hobby: Watching television Company: General Cable Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nPhillip: Hobby: Kayaking Company: Sauer-Danfoss Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nKristin: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nRafael: Hobby: Kayaking Company: General Cable Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nChad: Hobby: Foreign language learning Company: General Cable Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPhil: Hobby: Kayaking Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nConnie: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: General Cable Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nTommy: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \n\nZane Bennett's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Good evening! I couldn't help but overhear how passionate you sounded about your work. If you don't mind my curiosity, could you tell me which industry you're in, Zane?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Nice to meet you, Giselle. I work in the creative industry as a graphic designer. It's really engaging and allows me to express my creativity. What about you? What sort of work are you involved in?\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"That sounds really fascinating, Zane! Art plays a significant role in my life too. I'm an art student and like you, I mess around with color and structure to portray my imaginative ideas. By any chance, are you into outdoorsy activities? Or do you lean more towards indoor hobbies?\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"I'm definitely more into indoor activities, Giselle. Aside from my work, playing the guitar is the other passion of mine. You mentioned that you're an art student, so you must have a keen eye for color and design. Have you ever tried your hand at digital art or design? And just out of curiosity, are you a morning person, or are you more productive during afternoons or evenings?\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Digital art has always intrigued me, but I\u2019m somehow more inclined to the conventional styles of art. And I like to think of myself as a night owl, which means evenings are my most productive times. Speaking of times and hobbies, do you have a particular time when you indulge in your passion for playing the guitar? And are you part of any organization or company?\"\n\nTurn #5: Zane Bennett said: \"Oh, a night owl, creative at heart! I generally pick up the guitar during the evenings too, quite like you might pick up a brush. As for my day job, I am currently working at a local graphic design company. By the way, do you happen to know anyone employed at a company like Groupon, or 'General Cable' or say 'L.W Seecamp Company'?\"\n\nTurn #6: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Ah, that's quite an array of companies, Zane! As an art student, I'm familiar with a variety of circles. I can say I know a couple of folks from General Cable, they also appreciate creativity in their spare time. Out of curiosity, have you ever tried hobbies like kayaking or animal fancy? Perhaps you might share such hobbies with some of my acquaintances.\"\n\nTurn #7: Zane Bennett said: \"Funny you should mention that, Giselle. I've never tried kayaking, but it's one on my bucket list. A peaceful flow of water, the calming silence, it sounds breathtaking! And animal fancy sounds unique, I don't have the pleasure of engaging in it, but I certainly have friends who enjoy foraging. Do you also know people who are into foraging or other unique hobbies like that?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I can't say I personally know anyone who's into foraging, Zane, but it does sound quite interesting. It's wonderful how everyone has their own unique hobbies, isn't it? And about trying out new hobbies like kayaking, I've got a friend who might be able to introduce you to it. I'll be sure to pass along the suggestion next time I see them!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nZane Bennett's background: \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDavid: Hobby: Vacation Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nChristopher: Hobby: Go Company: McKinsey & Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nLee: Hobby: Go Company: Groupon Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPamela: Hobby: Watching television Company: General Cable Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nPhillip: Hobby: Kayaking Company: Sauer-Danfoss Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nKristin: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nRafael: Hobby: Kayaking Company: General Cable Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nChad: Hobby: Foreign language learning Company: General Cable Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPhil: Hobby: Kayaking Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nConnie: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: General Cable Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nTommy: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \n\nZane Bennett's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Good evening! I couldn't help but overhear how passionate you sounded about your work. If you don't mind my curiosity, could you tell me which industry you're in, Zane?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Nice to meet you, Giselle. I work in the creative industry as a graphic designer. It's really engaging and allows me to express my creativity. What about you? What sort of work are you involved in?\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"That sounds really fascinating, Zane! Art plays a significant role in my life too. I'm an art student and like you, I mess around with color and structure to portray my imaginative ideas. By any chance, are you into outdoorsy activities? Or do you lean more towards indoor hobbies?\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"I'm definitely more into indoor activities, Giselle. Aside from my work, playing the guitar is the other passion of mine. You mentioned that you're an art student, so you must have a keen eye for color and design. Have you ever tried your hand at digital art or design? And just out of curiosity, are you a morning person, or are you more productive during afternoons or evenings?\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Digital art has always intrigued me, but I\u2019m somehow more inclined to the conventional styles of art. And I like to think of myself as a night owl, which means evenings are my most productive times. Speaking of times and hobbies, do you have a particular time when you indulge in your passion for playing the guitar? And are you part of any organization or company?\"\n\nTurn #5: Zane Bennett said: \"Oh, a night owl, creative at heart! I generally pick up the guitar during the evenings too, quite like you might pick up a brush. As for my day job, I am currently working at a local graphic design company. By the way, do you happen to know anyone employed at a company like Groupon, or 'General Cable' or say 'L.W Seecamp Company'?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ah, that's quite an array of companies, Zane! As an art student, I'm familiar with a variety of circles. I can say I know a couple of folks from General Cable, they also appreciate creativity in their spare time. Out of curiosity, have you ever tried hobbies like kayaking or animal fancy? Perhaps you might share such hobbies with some of my acquaintances.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nZane Bennett's background: \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDavid: Hobby: Vacation Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nChristopher: Hobby: Go Company: McKinsey & Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nLee: Hobby: Go Company: Groupon Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPamela: Hobby: Watching television Company: General Cable Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nPhillip: Hobby: Kayaking Company: Sauer-Danfoss Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nKristin: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nRafael: Hobby: Kayaking Company: General Cable Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nChad: Hobby: Foreign language learning Company: General Cable Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPhil: Hobby: Kayaking Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nConnie: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: General Cable Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nTommy: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \n\nZane Bennett's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Good evening! I couldn't help but overhear how passionate you sounded about your work. If you don't mind my curiosity, could you tell me which industry you're in, Zane?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Nice to meet you, Giselle. I work in the creative industry as a graphic designer. It's really engaging and allows me to express my creativity. What about you? What sort of work are you involved in?\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"That sounds really fascinating, Zane! Art plays a significant role in my life too. I'm an art student and like you, I mess around with color and structure to portray my imaginative ideas. By any chance, are you into outdoorsy activities? Or do you lean more towards indoor hobbies?\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"I'm definitely more into indoor activities, Giselle. Aside from my work, playing the guitar is the other passion of mine. You mentioned that you're an art student, so you must have a keen eye for color and design. Have you ever tried your hand at digital art or design? And just out of curiosity, are you a morning person, or are you more productive during afternoons or evenings?\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Digital art has always intrigued me, but I\u2019m somehow more inclined to the conventional styles of art. And I like to think of myself as a night owl, which means evenings are my most productive times. Speaking of times and hobbies, do you have a particular time when you indulge in your passion for playing the guitar? And are you part of any organization or company?\"\n\nTurn #5: Zane Bennett said: \"Oh, a night owl, creative at heart! I generally pick up the guitar during the evenings too, quite like you might pick up a brush. As for my day job, I am currently working at a local graphic design company. By the way, do you happen to know anyone employed at a company like Groupon, or 'General Cable' or say 'L.W Seecamp Company'?\"\n\nTurn #6: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Ah, that's quite an array of companies, Zane! As an art student, I'm familiar with a variety of circles. I can say I know a couple of folks from General Cable, they also appreciate creativity in their spare time. Out of curiosity, have you ever tried hobbies like kayaking or animal fancy? Perhaps you might share such hobbies with some of my acquaintances.\"\n\nTurn #7: Zane Bennett said: \"Funny you should mention that, Giselle. I've never tried kayaking, but it's one on my bucket list. A peaceful flow of water, the calming silence, it sounds breathtaking! And animal fancy sounds unique, I don't have the pleasure of engaging in it, but I certainly have friends who enjoy foraging. Do you also know people who are into foraging or other unique hobbies like that?\"\n\nTurn #8: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I can't say I personally know anyone who's into foraging, Zane, but it does sound quite interesting. It's wonderful how everyone has their own unique hobbies, isn't it? And about trying out new hobbies like kayaking, I've got a friend who might be able to introduce you to it. I'll be sure to pass along the suggestion next time I see them!\"\n\nTurn #9: Zane Bennett said: \"I really appreciate that, Giselle! Being introduced to new experiences enriches our life, doesn't it? By the way, do your acquaintances at General Cable have any peculiar time preferences for their activities? Just wondering since certain hobbies like kayaking are most enjoyable at specific times.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"It's fascinating you mention that, Zane. My acquaintance from General Cable who loves kayaking usually goes in the afternoon. It strikes the perfect balance of water's calm and warm sunshine, so that might be a good time to give it a shot too. However, everyone has their own preferences, so exploring different times could be an adventure in itself!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nZane Bennett's background: \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDavid: Hobby: Vacation Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nChristopher: Hobby: Go Company: McKinsey & Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nLee: Hobby: Go Company: Groupon Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPamela: Hobby: Watching television Company: General Cable Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nPhillip: Hobby: Kayaking Company: Sauer-Danfoss Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nKristin: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nRafael: Hobby: Kayaking Company: General Cable Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nChad: Hobby: Foreign language learning Company: General Cable Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPhil: Hobby: Kayaking Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nConnie: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: General Cable Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nTommy: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \n\nZane Bennett's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Good evening! I couldn't help but overhear how passionate you sounded about your work. If you don't mind my curiosity, could you tell me which industry you're in, Zane?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Nice to meet you, Giselle. I work in the creative industry as a graphic designer. It's really engaging and allows me to express my creativity. What about you? What sort of work are you involved in?\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"That sounds really fascinating, Zane! Art plays a significant role in my life too. I'm an art student and like you, I mess around with color and structure to portray my imaginative ideas. By any chance, are you into outdoorsy activities? Or do you lean more towards indoor hobbies?\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"I'm definitely more into indoor activities, Giselle. Aside from my work, playing the guitar is the other passion of mine. You mentioned that you're an art student, so you must have a keen eye for color and design. Have you ever tried your hand at digital art or design? And just out of curiosity, are you a morning person, or are you more productive during afternoons or evenings?\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Digital art has always intrigued me, but I\u2019m somehow more inclined to the conventional styles of art. And I like to think of myself as a night owl, which means evenings are my most productive times. Speaking of times and hobbies, do you have a particular time when you indulge in your passion for playing the guitar? And are you part of any organization or company?\"\n\nTurn #5: Zane Bennett said: \"Oh, a night owl, creative at heart! I generally pick up the guitar during the evenings too, quite like you might pick up a brush. As for my day job, I am currently working at a local graphic design company. By the way, do you happen to know anyone employed at a company like Groupon, or 'General Cable' or say 'L.W Seecamp Company'?\"\n\nTurn #6: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Ah, that's quite an array of companies, Zane! As an art student, I'm familiar with a variety of circles. I can say I know a couple of folks from General Cable, they also appreciate creativity in their spare time. Out of curiosity, have you ever tried hobbies like kayaking or animal fancy? Perhaps you might share such hobbies with some of my acquaintances.\"\n\nTurn #7: Zane Bennett said: \"Funny you should mention that, Giselle. I've never tried kayaking, but it's one on my bucket list. A peaceful flow of water, the calming silence, it sounds breathtaking! And animal fancy sounds unique, I don't have the pleasure of engaging in it, but I certainly have friends who enjoy foraging. Do you also know people who are into foraging or other unique hobbies like that?\"\n\nTurn #8: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I can't say I personally know anyone who's into foraging, Zane, but it does sound quite interesting. It's wonderful how everyone has their own unique hobbies, isn't it? And about trying out new hobbies like kayaking, I've got a friend who might be able to introduce you to it. I'll be sure to pass along the suggestion next time I see them!\"\n\nTurn #9: Zane Bennett said: \"I really appreciate that, Giselle! Being introduced to new experiences enriches our life, doesn't it? By the way, do your acquaintances at General Cable have any peculiar time preferences for their activities? Just wondering since certain hobbies like kayaking are most enjoyable at specific times.\"\n\nTurn #10: Giselle Rousseau said: \"It's fascinating you mention that, Zane. My acquaintance from General Cable who loves kayaking usually goes in the afternoon. It strikes the perfect balance of water's calm and warm sunshine, so that might be a good time to give it a shot too. However, everyone has their own preferences, so exploring different times could be an adventure in itself!\"\n\nTurn #11: Zane Bennett said: \"That's fantastic, Giselle! Afternoon kayaking in calm water under warm sunshine does sound like a brilliant idea. Thank you for the advice, I'll make sure to give it a try. Apart from art and tutoring kayaking friends, do you have any other unique hobbies? Perhaps related to motor sports or gaming?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Motor sports or gaming? Those are certainly unique, Zane. While I don't personally engage in either, I do love capturing the world through my lens, a hobby born from my passion for photography. And biking, it helps me soak in the sights and sounds around me. Do you have a favorite indoor hobby that helps you unwind, perhaps something a little less common, like maybe playing Go?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nZane Bennett's background: \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDavid: Hobby: Vacation Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nChristopher: Hobby: Go Company: McKinsey & Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nLee: Hobby: Go Company: Groupon Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPamela: Hobby: Watching television Company: General Cable Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nPhillip: Hobby: Kayaking Company: Sauer-Danfoss Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nKristin: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nRafael: Hobby: Kayaking Company: General Cable Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nChad: Hobby: Foreign language learning Company: General Cable Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPhil: Hobby: Kayaking Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nConnie: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: General Cable Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nTommy: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \n\nZane Bennett's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Good evening! I couldn't help but overhear how passionate you sounded about your work. If you don't mind my curiosity, could you tell me which industry you're in, Zane?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Nice to meet you, Giselle. I work in the creative industry as a graphic designer. It's really engaging and allows me to express my creativity. What about you? What sort of work are you involved in?\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"That sounds really fascinating, Zane! Art plays a significant role in my life too. I'm an art student and like you, I mess around with color and structure to portray my imaginative ideas. By any chance, are you into outdoorsy activities? Or do you lean more towards indoor hobbies?\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"I'm definitely more into indoor activities, Giselle. Aside from my work, playing the guitar is the other passion of mine. You mentioned that you're an art student, so you must have a keen eye for color and design. Have you ever tried your hand at digital art or design? And just out of curiosity, are you a morning person, or are you more productive during afternoons or evenings?\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Digital art has always intrigued me, but I\u2019m somehow more inclined to the conventional styles of art. And I like to think of myself as a night owl, which means evenings are my most productive times. Speaking of times and hobbies, do you have a particular time when you indulge in your passion for playing the guitar? And are you part of any organization or company?\"\n\nTurn #5: Zane Bennett said: \"Oh, a night owl, creative at heart! I generally pick up the guitar during the evenings too, quite like you might pick up a brush. As for my day job, I am currently working at a local graphic design company. By the way, do you happen to know anyone employed at a company like Groupon, or 'General Cable' or say 'L.W Seecamp Company'?\"\n\nTurn #6: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Ah, that's quite an array of companies, Zane! As an art student, I'm familiar with a variety of circles. I can say I know a couple of folks from General Cable, they also appreciate creativity in their spare time. Out of curiosity, have you ever tried hobbies like kayaking or animal fancy? Perhaps you might share such hobbies with some of my acquaintances.\"\n\nTurn #7: Zane Bennett said: \"Funny you should mention that, Giselle. I've never tried kayaking, but it's one on my bucket list. A peaceful flow of water, the calming silence, it sounds breathtaking! And animal fancy sounds unique, I don't have the pleasure of engaging in it, but I certainly have friends who enjoy foraging. Do you also know people who are into foraging or other unique hobbies like that?\"\n\nTurn #8: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I can't say I personally know anyone who's into foraging, Zane, but it does sound quite interesting. It's wonderful how everyone has their own unique hobbies, isn't it? And about trying out new hobbies like kayaking, I've got a friend who might be able to introduce you to it. I'll be sure to pass along the suggestion next time I see them!\"\n\nTurn #9: Zane Bennett said: \"I really appreciate that, Giselle! Being introduced to new experiences enriches our life, doesn't it? By the way, do your acquaintances at General Cable have any peculiar time preferences for their activities? Just wondering since certain hobbies like kayaking are most enjoyable at specific times.\"\n\nTurn #10: Giselle Rousseau said: \"It's fascinating you mention that, Zane. My acquaintance from General Cable who loves kayaking usually goes in the afternoon. It strikes the perfect balance of water's calm and warm sunshine, so that might be a good time to give it a shot too. However, everyone has their own preferences, so exploring different times could be an adventure in itself!\"\n\nTurn #11: Zane Bennett said: \"That's fantastic, Giselle! Afternoon kayaking in calm water under warm sunshine does sound like a brilliant idea. Thank you for the advice, I'll make sure to give it a try. Apart from art and tutoring kayaking friends, do you have any other unique hobbies? Perhaps related to motor sports or gaming?\"\n\nTurn #12: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Motor sports or gaming? Those are certainly unique, Zane. While I don't personally engage in either, I do love capturing the world through my lens, a hobby born from my passion for photography. And biking, it helps me soak in the sights and sounds around me. Do you have a favorite indoor hobby that helps you unwind, perhaps something a little less common, like maybe playing Go?\"\n\nTurn #13: Zane Bennett said: \"Photography and biking sound absolutely wonderful, Giselle! Gives you a chance to experience the world intimately, doesn't it? As for indoor hobbies, while I do play the guitar, I wouldn't say I've ever played Go. Though, I have a friend named Scott who's heavily into gaming. He might be well-versed with it. Have you ever considered weaving your love for color into activities like lace-making? One of my friends finds it incredibly soothing.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Lace-making, that's fascinating, Zane! It's not something I've involved myself in yet, but I'm always open to trying out new things. Your friend must indeed find a lot of peace in such detailed work. Speaking of detailed pursuits, I've heard that watching television can also be quite immersive, following storylines and characters, though it might not be as traditional a hobby. Do you find media like that to be captivating too?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nZane Bennett's background: \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDavid: Hobby: Vacation Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nChristopher: Hobby: Go Company: McKinsey & Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nLee: Hobby: Go Company: Groupon Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPamela: Hobby: Watching television Company: General Cable Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nPhillip: Hobby: Kayaking Company: Sauer-Danfoss Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nKristin: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nRafael: Hobby: Kayaking Company: General Cable Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nChad: Hobby: Foreign language learning Company: General Cable Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPhil: Hobby: Kayaking Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nConnie: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: General Cable Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nTommy: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \n\nZane Bennett's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Good evening! I couldn't help but overhear how passionate you sounded about your work. If you don't mind my curiosity, could you tell me which industry you're in, Zane?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Nice to meet you, Giselle. I work in the creative industry as a graphic designer. It's really engaging and allows me to express my creativity. What about you? What sort of work are you involved in?\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"That sounds really fascinating, Zane! Art plays a significant role in my life too. I'm an art student and like you, I mess around with color and structure to portray my imaginative ideas. By any chance, are you into outdoorsy activities? Or do you lean more towards indoor hobbies?\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"I'm definitely more into indoor activities, Giselle. Aside from my work, playing the guitar is the other passion of mine. You mentioned that you're an art student, so you must have a keen eye for color and design. Have you ever tried your hand at digital art or design? And just out of curiosity, are you a morning person, or are you more productive during afternoons or evenings?\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Digital art has always intrigued me, but I\u2019m somehow more inclined to the conventional styles of art. And I like to think of myself as a night owl, which means evenings are my most productive times. Speaking of times and hobbies, do you have a particular time when you indulge in your passion for playing the guitar? And are you part of any organization or company?\"\n\nTurn #5: Zane Bennett said: \"Oh, a night owl, creative at heart! I generally pick up the guitar during the evenings too, quite like you might pick up a brush. As for my day job, I am currently working at a local graphic design company. By the way, do you happen to know anyone employed at a company like Groupon, or 'General Cable' or say 'L.W Seecamp Company'?\"\n\nTurn #6: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Ah, that's quite an array of companies, Zane! As an art student, I'm familiar with a variety of circles. I can say I know a couple of folks from General Cable, they also appreciate creativity in their spare time. Out of curiosity, have you ever tried hobbies like kayaking or animal fancy? Perhaps you might share such hobbies with some of my acquaintances.\"\n\nTurn #7: Zane Bennett said: \"Funny you should mention that, Giselle. I've never tried kayaking, but it's one on my bucket list. A peaceful flow of water, the calming silence, it sounds breathtaking! And animal fancy sounds unique, I don't have the pleasure of engaging in it, but I certainly have friends who enjoy foraging. Do you also know people who are into foraging or other unique hobbies like that?\"\n\nTurn #8: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I can't say I personally know anyone who's into foraging, Zane, but it does sound quite interesting. It's wonderful how everyone has their own unique hobbies, isn't it? And about trying out new hobbies like kayaking, I've got a friend who might be able to introduce you to it. I'll be sure to pass along the suggestion next time I see them!\"\n\nTurn #9: Zane Bennett said: \"I really appreciate that, Giselle! Being introduced to new experiences enriches our life, doesn't it? By the way, do your acquaintances at General Cable have any peculiar time preferences for their activities? Just wondering since certain hobbies like kayaking are most enjoyable at specific times.\"\n\nTurn #10: Giselle Rousseau said: \"It's fascinating you mention that, Zane. My acquaintance from General Cable who loves kayaking usually goes in the afternoon. It strikes the perfect balance of water's calm and warm sunshine, so that might be a good time to give it a shot too. However, everyone has their own preferences, so exploring different times could be an adventure in itself!\"\n\nTurn #11: Zane Bennett said: \"That's fantastic, Giselle! Afternoon kayaking in calm water under warm sunshine does sound like a brilliant idea. Thank you for the advice, I'll make sure to give it a try. Apart from art and tutoring kayaking friends, do you have any other unique hobbies? Perhaps related to motor sports or gaming?\"\n\nTurn #12: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Motor sports or gaming? Those are certainly unique, Zane. While I don't personally engage in either, I do love capturing the world through my lens, a hobby born from my passion for photography. And biking, it helps me soak in the sights and sounds around me. Do you have a favorite indoor hobby that helps you unwind, perhaps something a little less common, like maybe playing Go?\"\n\nTurn #13: Zane Bennett said: \"Photography and biking sound absolutely wonderful, Giselle! Gives you a chance to experience the world intimately, doesn't it? As for indoor hobbies, while I do play the guitar, I wouldn't say I've ever played Go. Though, I have a friend named Scott who's heavily into gaming. He might be well-versed with it. Have you ever considered weaving your love for color into activities like lace-making? One of my friends finds it incredibly soothing.\"\n\nTurn #14: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Lace-making, that's fascinating, Zane! It's not something I've involved myself in yet, but I'm always open to trying out new things. Your friend must indeed find a lot of peace in such detailed work. Speaking of detailed pursuits, I've heard that watching television can also be quite immersive, following storylines and characters, though it might not be as traditional a hobby. Do you find media like that to be captivating too?\"\n\nTurn #15: Zane Bennett said: \"Indeed, delving into storylines and character development can be quite captivating, Giselle. I must admit I enjoy a good show occasionally. Besides, it provides a different perspective, fueling creativity. But nothing beats strumming my guitar and letting the melodies flow. Speaking of the creative process, ever find yourself drawn towards unique physical activities? Say, weightlifting? I know it's not traditional, but creativity thrives in the midst of variety, doesn't it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Weightlifting sounds like quite the challenge, Zane! Although it's not something I regularly engage in, it integrates well with elements of movements, bodily strength, and sheer determination. I appreciate your perspective on finding creativity in non-traditional methods! Let's extend that thought to more familiar territory. For example, suppose you could pick up another musical instrument other than the guitar. What would you choose and why?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Zane Bennett, your task is to act/speak as Zane Bennett would, keeping in mind Zane Bennett's social goal.\nYou can find Zane Bennett's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Zane Bennett's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Zane Bennett's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: \nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. Personality and values description: Zane Bennett is creative and outgoing, he values achievement and fairness. His decision-making is unique, often finding novel solutions to problems. Zane's secrets: He's secretly engaged to his best friend's ex.\nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Unknown\nZane Bennett's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nTina: Hobby: Lacemaking Company: Groupon Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRafael: Hobby: Kayaking Company: General Cable Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nWanda: Hobby: Weightlifting Company: Sauer-Danfoss Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRaymond: Hobby: Foraging Company: Chicago Bridge & Iron Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRicky: Hobby: Foraging Company: L. W. Seecamp Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRobert: Hobby: Foraging Company: Lennox International Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nFrances: Hobby: Foraging Company: Expedia Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nScott: Hobby: Gaming Company: Expedia Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nHelen: Hobby: Motor sports Company: Union Bank Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRobin: Hobby: Gaming Company: L. W. Seecamp Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nJames: Hobby: Vacation Company: Urban Outfitters Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Good evening! I couldn't help but overhear how passionate you sounded about your work. If you don't mind my curiosity, could you tell me which industry you're in, Zane?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Nice to meet you, Giselle. I work in the creative industry as a graphic designer. It's really engaging and allows me to express my creativity. What about you? What sort of work are you involved in?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nZane Bennett's background: \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDavid: Hobby: Vacation Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nChristopher: Hobby: Go Company: McKinsey & Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nLee: Hobby: Go Company: Groupon Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPamela: Hobby: Watching television Company: General Cable Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nPhillip: Hobby: Kayaking Company: Sauer-Danfoss Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nKristin: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nRafael: Hobby: Kayaking Company: General Cable Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nChad: Hobby: Foreign language learning Company: General Cable Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPhil: Hobby: Kayaking Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nConnie: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: General Cable Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nTommy: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \n\nZane Bennett's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Good evening! I couldn't help but overhear how passionate you sounded about your work. If you don't mind my curiosity, could you tell me which industry you're in, Zane?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Nice to meet you, Giselle. I work in the creative industry as a graphic designer. It's really engaging and allows me to express my creativity. What about you? What sort of work are you involved in?\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"That sounds really fascinating, Zane! Art plays a significant role in my life too. I'm an art student and like you, I mess around with color and structure to portray my imaginative ideas. By any chance, are you into outdoorsy activities? Or do you lean more towards indoor hobbies?\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"I'm definitely more into indoor activities, Giselle. Aside from my work, playing the guitar is the other passion of mine. You mentioned that you're an art student, so you must have a keen eye for color and design. Have you ever tried your hand at digital art or design? And just out of curiosity, are you a morning person, or are you more productive during afternoons or evenings?\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Digital art has always intrigued me, but I\u2019m somehow more inclined to the conventional styles of art. And I like to think of myself as a night owl, which means evenings are my most productive times. Speaking of times and hobbies, do you have a particular time when you indulge in your passion for playing the guitar? And are you part of any organization or company?\"\n\nTurn #5: Zane Bennett said: \"Oh, a night owl, creative at heart! I generally pick up the guitar during the evenings too, quite like you might pick up a brush. As for my day job, I am currently working at a local graphic design company. By the way, do you happen to know anyone employed at a company like Groupon, or 'General Cable' or say 'L.W Seecamp Company'?\"\n\nTurn #6: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Ah, that's quite an array of companies, Zane! As an art student, I'm familiar with a variety of circles. I can say I know a couple of folks from General Cable, they also appreciate creativity in their spare time. Out of curiosity, have you ever tried hobbies like kayaking or animal fancy? Perhaps you might share such hobbies with some of my acquaintances.\"\n\nTurn #7: Zane Bennett said: \"Funny you should mention that, Giselle. I've never tried kayaking, but it's one on my bucket list. A peaceful flow of water, the calming silence, it sounds breathtaking! And animal fancy sounds unique, I don't have the pleasure of engaging in it, but I certainly have friends who enjoy foraging. Do you also know people who are into foraging or other unique hobbies like that?\"\n\nTurn #8: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I can't say I personally know anyone who's into foraging, Zane, but it does sound quite interesting. It's wonderful how everyone has their own unique hobbies, isn't it? And about trying out new hobbies like kayaking, I've got a friend who might be able to introduce you to it. I'll be sure to pass along the suggestion next time I see them!\"\n\nTurn #9: Zane Bennett said: \"I really appreciate that, Giselle! Being introduced to new experiences enriches our life, doesn't it? By the way, do your acquaintances at General Cable have any peculiar time preferences for their activities? Just wondering since certain hobbies like kayaking are most enjoyable at specific times.\"\n\nTurn #10: Giselle Rousseau said: \"It's fascinating you mention that, Zane. My acquaintance from General Cable who loves kayaking usually goes in the afternoon. It strikes the perfect balance of water's calm and warm sunshine, so that might be a good time to give it a shot too. However, everyone has their own preferences, so exploring different times could be an adventure in itself!\"\n\nTurn #11: Zane Bennett said: \"That's fantastic, Giselle! Afternoon kayaking in calm water under warm sunshine does sound like a brilliant idea. Thank you for the advice, I'll make sure to give it a try. Apart from art and tutoring kayaking friends, do you have any other unique hobbies? Perhaps related to motor sports or gaming?\"\n\nTurn #12: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Motor sports or gaming? Those are certainly unique, Zane. While I don't personally engage in either, I do love capturing the world through my lens, a hobby born from my passion for photography. And biking, it helps me soak in the sights and sounds around me. Do you have a favorite indoor hobby that helps you unwind, perhaps something a little less common, like maybe playing Go?\"\n\nTurn #13: Zane Bennett said: \"Photography and biking sound absolutely wonderful, Giselle! Gives you a chance to experience the world intimately, doesn't it? As for indoor hobbies, while I do play the guitar, I wouldn't say I've ever played Go. Though, I have a friend named Scott who's heavily into gaming. He might be well-versed with it. Have you ever considered weaving your love for color into activities like lace-making? One of my friends finds it incredibly soothing.\"\n\nTurn #14: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Lace-making, that's fascinating, Zane! It's not something I've involved myself in yet, but I'm always open to trying out new things. Your friend must indeed find a lot of peace in such detailed work. Speaking of detailed pursuits, I've heard that watching television can also be quite immersive, following storylines and characters, though it might not be as traditional a hobby. Do you find media like that to be captivating too?\"\n\nTurn #15: Zane Bennett said: \"Indeed, delving into storylines and character development can be quite captivating, Giselle. I must admit I enjoy a good show occasionally. Besides, it provides a different perspective, fueling creativity. But nothing beats strumming my guitar and letting the melodies flow. Speaking of the creative process, ever find yourself drawn towards unique physical activities? Say, weightlifting? I know it's not traditional, but creativity thrives in the midst of variety, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #16: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Weightlifting sounds like quite the challenge, Zane! Although it's not something I regularly engage in, it integrates well with elements of movements, bodily strength, and sheer determination. I appreciate your perspective on finding creativity in non-traditional methods! Let's extend that thought to more familiar territory. For example, suppose you could pick up another musical instrument other than the guitar. What would you choose and why?\"\n\nTurn #17: Zane Bennett said: \"That's a unique question, Giselle! If I were to pick up another instrument, it'd probably be the piano. It has this charm, the ability to create a melody and harmony together, providing a full musical experience. Its versatile nature and the rich sound it produces can add depth to any composition. From a guitarist's viewpoint, both guitar and piano are about creating intricate connections between notes, so the transition could be interesting! By the way, have you ever given a thought about trying a hobby like foraging, more adventure and exploration-oriented? Because one of my friends, Robert, finds it quite refreshing.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #18. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Exploration-oriented hobbies are a thrill, Zane, and foraging could be very intriguing! However, my fondness leans more towards activities like biking or photography, where the charm lies in capturing the essence of the journey itself. The latter, in fact, aligns well with Robert's hobby, considering both involve a good eye for detail. By the way, ever think about learning foreign languages? It might sound unrelated but can open up a new dimension to your creative work, understanding cultures and the versatility of communication. I know a friend who's into it. What do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Zane Bennett, your task is to act/speak as Zane Bennett would, keeping in mind Zane Bennett's social goal.\nYou can find Zane Bennett's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Zane Bennett's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Zane Bennett's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: \nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. Personality and values description: Zane Bennett is creative and outgoing, he values achievement and fairness. His decision-making is unique, often finding novel solutions to problems. Zane's secrets: He's secretly engaged to his best friend's ex.\nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Unknown\nZane Bennett's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nTina: Hobby: Lacemaking Company: Groupon Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRafael: Hobby: Kayaking Company: General Cable Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nWanda: Hobby: Weightlifting Company: Sauer-Danfoss Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRaymond: Hobby: Foraging Company: Chicago Bridge & Iron Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRicky: Hobby: Foraging Company: L. W. Seecamp Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRobert: Hobby: Foraging Company: Lennox International Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nFrances: Hobby: Foraging Company: Expedia Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nScott: Hobby: Gaming Company: Expedia Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nHelen: Hobby: Motor sports Company: Union Bank Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRobin: Hobby: Gaming Company: L. W. Seecamp Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nJames: Hobby: Vacation Company: Urban Outfitters Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Good evening! I couldn't help but overhear how passionate you sounded about your work. If you don't mind my curiosity, could you tell me which industry you're in, Zane?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Nice to meet you, Giselle. I work in the creative industry as a graphic designer. It's really engaging and allows me to express my creativity. What about you? What sort of work are you involved in?\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"That sounds really fascinating, Zane! Art plays a significant role in my life too. I'm an art student and like you, I mess around with color and structure to portray my imaginative ideas. By any chance, are you into outdoorsy activities? Or do you lean more towards indoor hobbies?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm definitely more into indoor activities, Giselle. Aside from my work, playing the guitar is the other passion of mine. You mentioned that you're an art student, so you must have a keen eye for color and design. Have you ever tried your hand at digital art or design? And just out of curiosity, are you a morning person, or are you more productive during afternoons or evenings?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Zane Bennett, your task is to act/speak as Zane Bennett would, keeping in mind Zane Bennett's social goal.\nYou can find Zane Bennett's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Zane Bennett's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Zane Bennett's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: \nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. Personality and values description: Zane Bennett is creative and outgoing, he values achievement and fairness. His decision-making is unique, often finding novel solutions to problems. Zane's secrets: He's secretly engaged to his best friend's ex.\nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Unknown\nZane Bennett's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nTina: Hobby: Lacemaking Company: Groupon Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRafael: Hobby: Kayaking Company: General Cable Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nWanda: Hobby: Weightlifting Company: Sauer-Danfoss Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRaymond: Hobby: Foraging Company: Chicago Bridge & Iron Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRicky: Hobby: Foraging Company: L. W. Seecamp Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRobert: Hobby: Foraging Company: Lennox International Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nFrances: Hobby: Foraging Company: Expedia Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nScott: Hobby: Gaming Company: Expedia Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nHelen: Hobby: Motor sports Company: Union Bank Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRobin: Hobby: Gaming Company: L. W. Seecamp Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nJames: Hobby: Vacation Company: Urban Outfitters Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Good evening! I couldn't help but overhear how passionate you sounded about your work. If you don't mind my curiosity, could you tell me which industry you're in, Zane?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Nice to meet you, Giselle. I work in the creative industry as a graphic designer. It's really engaging and allows me to express my creativity. What about you? What sort of work are you involved in?\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"That sounds really fascinating, Zane! Art plays a significant role in my life too. I'm an art student and like you, I mess around with color and structure to portray my imaginative ideas. By any chance, are you into outdoorsy activities? Or do you lean more towards indoor hobbies?\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"I'm definitely more into indoor activities, Giselle. Aside from my work, playing the guitar is the other passion of mine. You mentioned that you're an art student, so you must have a keen eye for color and design. Have you ever tried your hand at digital art or design? And just out of curiosity, are you a morning person, or are you more productive during afternoons or evenings?\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Digital art has always intrigued me, but I\u2019m somehow more inclined to the conventional styles of art. And I like to think of myself as a night owl, which means evenings are my most productive times. Speaking of times and hobbies, do you have a particular time when you indulge in your passion for playing the guitar? And are you part of any organization or company?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oh, a night owl, creative at heart! I generally pick up the guitar during the evenings too, quite like you might pick up a brush. As for my day job, I am currently working at a local graphic design company. By the way, do you happen to know anyone employed at a company like Groupon, or 'General Cable' or say 'L.W Seecamp Company'?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Zane Bennett, your task is to act/speak as Zane Bennett would, keeping in mind Zane Bennett's social goal.\nYou can find Zane Bennett's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Zane Bennett's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Zane Bennett's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: \nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. Personality and values description: Zane Bennett is creative and outgoing, he values achievement and fairness. His decision-making is unique, often finding novel solutions to problems. Zane's secrets: He's secretly engaged to his best friend's ex.\nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Unknown\nZane Bennett's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nTina: Hobby: Lacemaking Company: Groupon Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRafael: Hobby: Kayaking Company: General Cable Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nWanda: Hobby: Weightlifting Company: Sauer-Danfoss Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRaymond: Hobby: Foraging Company: Chicago Bridge & Iron Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRicky: Hobby: Foraging Company: L. W. Seecamp Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRobert: Hobby: Foraging Company: Lennox International Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nFrances: Hobby: Foraging Company: Expedia Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nScott: Hobby: Gaming Company: Expedia Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nHelen: Hobby: Motor sports Company: Union Bank Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRobin: Hobby: Gaming Company: L. W. Seecamp Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nJames: Hobby: Vacation Company: Urban Outfitters Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Good evening! I couldn't help but overhear how passionate you sounded about your work. If you don't mind my curiosity, could you tell me which industry you're in, Zane?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Nice to meet you, Giselle. I work in the creative industry as a graphic designer. It's really engaging and allows me to express my creativity. What about you? What sort of work are you involved in?\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"That sounds really fascinating, Zane! Art plays a significant role in my life too. I'm an art student and like you, I mess around with color and structure to portray my imaginative ideas. By any chance, are you into outdoorsy activities? Or do you lean more towards indoor hobbies?\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"I'm definitely more into indoor activities, Giselle. Aside from my work, playing the guitar is the other passion of mine. You mentioned that you're an art student, so you must have a keen eye for color and design. Have you ever tried your hand at digital art or design? And just out of curiosity, are you a morning person, or are you more productive during afternoons or evenings?\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Digital art has always intrigued me, but I\u2019m somehow more inclined to the conventional styles of art. And I like to think of myself as a night owl, which means evenings are my most productive times. Speaking of times and hobbies, do you have a particular time when you indulge in your passion for playing the guitar? And are you part of any organization or company?\"\n\nTurn #5: Zane Bennett said: \"Oh, a night owl, creative at heart! I generally pick up the guitar during the evenings too, quite like you might pick up a brush. As for my day job, I am currently working at a local graphic design company. By the way, do you happen to know anyone employed at a company like Groupon, or 'General Cable' or say 'L.W Seecamp Company'?\"\n\nTurn #6: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Ah, that's quite an array of companies, Zane! As an art student, I'm familiar with a variety of circles. I can say I know a couple of folks from General Cable, they also appreciate creativity in their spare time. Out of curiosity, have you ever tried hobbies like kayaking or animal fancy? Perhaps you might share such hobbies with some of my acquaintances.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Funny you should mention that, Giselle. I've never tried kayaking, but it's one on my bucket list. A peaceful flow of water, the calming silence, it sounds breathtaking! And animal fancy sounds unique, I don't have the pleasure of engaging in it, but I certainly have friends who enjoy foraging. Do you also know people who are into foraging or other unique hobbies like that?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Zane Bennett, your task is to act/speak as Zane Bennett would, keeping in mind Zane Bennett's social goal.\nYou can find Zane Bennett's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Zane Bennett's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Zane Bennett's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: \nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. Personality and values description: Zane Bennett is creative and outgoing, he values achievement and fairness. His decision-making is unique, often finding novel solutions to problems. Zane's secrets: He's secretly engaged to his best friend's ex.\nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Unknown\nZane Bennett's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nTina: Hobby: Lacemaking Company: Groupon Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRafael: Hobby: Kayaking Company: General Cable Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nWanda: Hobby: Weightlifting Company: Sauer-Danfoss Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRaymond: Hobby: Foraging Company: Chicago Bridge & Iron Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRicky: Hobby: Foraging Company: L. W. Seecamp Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRobert: Hobby: Foraging Company: Lennox International Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nFrances: Hobby: Foraging Company: Expedia Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nScott: Hobby: Gaming Company: Expedia Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nHelen: Hobby: Motor sports Company: Union Bank Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRobin: Hobby: Gaming Company: L. W. Seecamp Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nJames: Hobby: Vacation Company: Urban Outfitters Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Good evening! I couldn't help but overhear how passionate you sounded about your work. If you don't mind my curiosity, could you tell me which industry you're in, Zane?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Nice to meet you, Giselle. I work in the creative industry as a graphic designer. It's really engaging and allows me to express my creativity. What about you? What sort of work are you involved in?\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"That sounds really fascinating, Zane! Art plays a significant role in my life too. I'm an art student and like you, I mess around with color and structure to portray my imaginative ideas. By any chance, are you into outdoorsy activities? Or do you lean more towards indoor hobbies?\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"I'm definitely more into indoor activities, Giselle. Aside from my work, playing the guitar is the other passion of mine. You mentioned that you're an art student, so you must have a keen eye for color and design. Have you ever tried your hand at digital art or design? And just out of curiosity, are you a morning person, or are you more productive during afternoons or evenings?\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Digital art has always intrigued me, but I\u2019m somehow more inclined to the conventional styles of art. And I like to think of myself as a night owl, which means evenings are my most productive times. Speaking of times and hobbies, do you have a particular time when you indulge in your passion for playing the guitar? And are you part of any organization or company?\"\n\nTurn #5: Zane Bennett said: \"Oh, a night owl, creative at heart! I generally pick up the guitar during the evenings too, quite like you might pick up a brush. As for my day job, I am currently working at a local graphic design company. By the way, do you happen to know anyone employed at a company like Groupon, or 'General Cable' or say 'L.W Seecamp Company'?\"\n\nTurn #6: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Ah, that's quite an array of companies, Zane! As an art student, I'm familiar with a variety of circles. I can say I know a couple of folks from General Cable, they also appreciate creativity in their spare time. Out of curiosity, have you ever tried hobbies like kayaking or animal fancy? Perhaps you might share such hobbies with some of my acquaintances.\"\n\nTurn #7: Zane Bennett said: \"Funny you should mention that, Giselle. I've never tried kayaking, but it's one on my bucket list. A peaceful flow of water, the calming silence, it sounds breathtaking! And animal fancy sounds unique, I don't have the pleasure of engaging in it, but I certainly have friends who enjoy foraging. Do you also know people who are into foraging or other unique hobbies like that?\"\n\nTurn #8: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I can't say I personally know anyone who's into foraging, Zane, but it does sound quite interesting. It's wonderful how everyone has their own unique hobbies, isn't it? And about trying out new hobbies like kayaking, I've got a friend who might be able to introduce you to it. I'll be sure to pass along the suggestion next time I see them!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I really appreciate that, Giselle! Being introduced to new experiences enriches our life, doesn't it? By the way, do your acquaintances at General Cable have any peculiar time preferences for their activities? Just wondering since certain hobbies like kayaking are most enjoyable at specific times.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Zane Bennett, your task is to act/speak as Zane Bennett would, keeping in mind Zane Bennett's social goal.\nYou can find Zane Bennett's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Zane Bennett's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Zane Bennett's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: \nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. Personality and values description: Zane Bennett is creative and outgoing, he values achievement and fairness. His decision-making is unique, often finding novel solutions to problems. Zane's secrets: He's secretly engaged to his best friend's ex.\nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Unknown\nZane Bennett's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nTina: Hobby: Lacemaking Company: Groupon Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRafael: Hobby: Kayaking Company: General Cable Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nWanda: Hobby: Weightlifting Company: Sauer-Danfoss Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRaymond: Hobby: Foraging Company: Chicago Bridge & Iron Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRicky: Hobby: Foraging Company: L. W. Seecamp Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRobert: Hobby: Foraging Company: Lennox International Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nFrances: Hobby: Foraging Company: Expedia Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nScott: Hobby: Gaming Company: Expedia Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nHelen: Hobby: Motor sports Company: Union Bank Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRobin: Hobby: Gaming Company: L. W. Seecamp Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nJames: Hobby: Vacation Company: Urban Outfitters Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Good evening! I couldn't help but overhear how passionate you sounded about your work. If you don't mind my curiosity, could you tell me which industry you're in, Zane?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Nice to meet you, Giselle. I work in the creative industry as a graphic designer. It's really engaging and allows me to express my creativity. What about you? What sort of work are you involved in?\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"That sounds really fascinating, Zane! Art plays a significant role in my life too. I'm an art student and like you, I mess around with color and structure to portray my imaginative ideas. By any chance, are you into outdoorsy activities? Or do you lean more towards indoor hobbies?\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"I'm definitely more into indoor activities, Giselle. Aside from my work, playing the guitar is the other passion of mine. You mentioned that you're an art student, so you must have a keen eye for color and design. Have you ever tried your hand at digital art or design? And just out of curiosity, are you a morning person, or are you more productive during afternoons or evenings?\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Digital art has always intrigued me, but I\u2019m somehow more inclined to the conventional styles of art. And I like to think of myself as a night owl, which means evenings are my most productive times. Speaking of times and hobbies, do you have a particular time when you indulge in your passion for playing the guitar? And are you part of any organization or company?\"\n\nTurn #5: Zane Bennett said: \"Oh, a night owl, creative at heart! I generally pick up the guitar during the evenings too, quite like you might pick up a brush. As for my day job, I am currently working at a local graphic design company. By the way, do you happen to know anyone employed at a company like Groupon, or 'General Cable' or say 'L.W Seecamp Company'?\"\n\nTurn #6: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Ah, that's quite an array of companies, Zane! As an art student, I'm familiar with a variety of circles. I can say I know a couple of folks from General Cable, they also appreciate creativity in their spare time. Out of curiosity, have you ever tried hobbies like kayaking or animal fancy? Perhaps you might share such hobbies with some of my acquaintances.\"\n\nTurn #7: Zane Bennett said: \"Funny you should mention that, Giselle. I've never tried kayaking, but it's one on my bucket list. A peaceful flow of water, the calming silence, it sounds breathtaking! And animal fancy sounds unique, I don't have the pleasure of engaging in it, but I certainly have friends who enjoy foraging. Do you also know people who are into foraging or other unique hobbies like that?\"\n\nTurn #8: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I can't say I personally know anyone who's into foraging, Zane, but it does sound quite interesting. It's wonderful how everyone has their own unique hobbies, isn't it? And about trying out new hobbies like kayaking, I've got a friend who might be able to introduce you to it. I'll be sure to pass along the suggestion next time I see them!\"\n\nTurn #9: Zane Bennett said: \"I really appreciate that, Giselle! Being introduced to new experiences enriches our life, doesn't it? By the way, do your acquaintances at General Cable have any peculiar time preferences for their activities? Just wondering since certain hobbies like kayaking are most enjoyable at specific times.\"\n\nTurn #10: Giselle Rousseau said: \"It's fascinating you mention that, Zane. My acquaintance from General Cable who loves kayaking usually goes in the afternoon. It strikes the perfect balance of water's calm and warm sunshine, so that might be a good time to give it a shot too. However, everyone has their own preferences, so exploring different times could be an adventure in itself!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's fantastic, Giselle! Afternoon kayaking in calm water under warm sunshine does sound like a brilliant idea. Thank you for the advice, I'll make sure to give it a try. Apart from art and tutoring kayaking friends, do you have any other unique hobbies? Perhaps related to motor sports or gaming?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Zane Bennett, your task is to act/speak as Zane Bennett would, keeping in mind Zane Bennett's social goal.\nYou can find Zane Bennett's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Zane Bennett's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Zane Bennett's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: \nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. Personality and values description: Zane Bennett is creative and outgoing, he values achievement and fairness. His decision-making is unique, often finding novel solutions to problems. Zane's secrets: He's secretly engaged to his best friend's ex.\nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Unknown\nZane Bennett's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nTina: Hobby: Lacemaking Company: Groupon Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRafael: Hobby: Kayaking Company: General Cable Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nWanda: Hobby: Weightlifting Company: Sauer-Danfoss Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRaymond: Hobby: Foraging Company: Chicago Bridge & Iron Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRicky: Hobby: Foraging Company: L. W. Seecamp Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRobert: Hobby: Foraging Company: Lennox International Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nFrances: Hobby: Foraging Company: Expedia Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nScott: Hobby: Gaming Company: Expedia Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nHelen: Hobby: Motor sports Company: Union Bank Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRobin: Hobby: Gaming Company: L. W. Seecamp Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nJames: Hobby: Vacation Company: Urban Outfitters Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Good evening! I couldn't help but overhear how passionate you sounded about your work. If you don't mind my curiosity, could you tell me which industry you're in, Zane?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Nice to meet you, Giselle. I work in the creative industry as a graphic designer. It's really engaging and allows me to express my creativity. What about you? What sort of work are you involved in?\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"That sounds really fascinating, Zane! Art plays a significant role in my life too. I'm an art student and like you, I mess around with color and structure to portray my imaginative ideas. By any chance, are you into outdoorsy activities? Or do you lean more towards indoor hobbies?\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"I'm definitely more into indoor activities, Giselle. Aside from my work, playing the guitar is the other passion of mine. You mentioned that you're an art student, so you must have a keen eye for color and design. Have you ever tried your hand at digital art or design? And just out of curiosity, are you a morning person, or are you more productive during afternoons or evenings?\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Digital art has always intrigued me, but I\u2019m somehow more inclined to the conventional styles of art. And I like to think of myself as a night owl, which means evenings are my most productive times. Speaking of times and hobbies, do you have a particular time when you indulge in your passion for playing the guitar? And are you part of any organization or company?\"\n\nTurn #5: Zane Bennett said: \"Oh, a night owl, creative at heart! I generally pick up the guitar during the evenings too, quite like you might pick up a brush. As for my day job, I am currently working at a local graphic design company. By the way, do you happen to know anyone employed at a company like Groupon, or 'General Cable' or say 'L.W Seecamp Company'?\"\n\nTurn #6: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Ah, that's quite an array of companies, Zane! As an art student, I'm familiar with a variety of circles. I can say I know a couple of folks from General Cable, they also appreciate creativity in their spare time. Out of curiosity, have you ever tried hobbies like kayaking or animal fancy? Perhaps you might share such hobbies with some of my acquaintances.\"\n\nTurn #7: Zane Bennett said: \"Funny you should mention that, Giselle. I've never tried kayaking, but it's one on my bucket list. A peaceful flow of water, the calming silence, it sounds breathtaking! And animal fancy sounds unique, I don't have the pleasure of engaging in it, but I certainly have friends who enjoy foraging. Do you also know people who are into foraging or other unique hobbies like that?\"\n\nTurn #8: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I can't say I personally know anyone who's into foraging, Zane, but it does sound quite interesting. It's wonderful how everyone has their own unique hobbies, isn't it? And about trying out new hobbies like kayaking, I've got a friend who might be able to introduce you to it. I'll be sure to pass along the suggestion next time I see them!\"\n\nTurn #9: Zane Bennett said: \"I really appreciate that, Giselle! Being introduced to new experiences enriches our life, doesn't it? By the way, do your acquaintances at General Cable have any peculiar time preferences for their activities? Just wondering since certain hobbies like kayaking are most enjoyable at specific times.\"\n\nTurn #10: Giselle Rousseau said: \"It's fascinating you mention that, Zane. My acquaintance from General Cable who loves kayaking usually goes in the afternoon. It strikes the perfect balance of water's calm and warm sunshine, so that might be a good time to give it a shot too. However, everyone has their own preferences, so exploring different times could be an adventure in itself!\"\n\nTurn #11: Zane Bennett said: \"That's fantastic, Giselle! Afternoon kayaking in calm water under warm sunshine does sound like a brilliant idea. Thank you for the advice, I'll make sure to give it a try. Apart from art and tutoring kayaking friends, do you have any other unique hobbies? Perhaps related to motor sports or gaming?\"\n\nTurn #12: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Motor sports or gaming? Those are certainly unique, Zane. While I don't personally engage in either, I do love capturing the world through my lens, a hobby born from my passion for photography. And biking, it helps me soak in the sights and sounds around me. Do you have a favorite indoor hobby that helps you unwind, perhaps something a little less common, like maybe playing Go?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Photography and biking sound absolutely wonderful, Giselle! Gives you a chance to experience the world intimately, doesn't it? As for indoor hobbies, while I do play the guitar, I wouldn't say I've ever played Go. Though, I have a friend named Scott who's heavily into gaming. He might be well-versed with it. Have you ever considered weaving your love for color into activities like lace-making? One of my friends finds it incredibly soothing.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Zane Bennett, your task is to act/speak as Zane Bennett would, keeping in mind Zane Bennett's social goal.\nYou can find Zane Bennett's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Zane Bennett's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Zane Bennett's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: \nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. Personality and values description: Zane Bennett is creative and outgoing, he values achievement and fairness. His decision-making is unique, often finding novel solutions to problems. Zane's secrets: He's secretly engaged to his best friend's ex.\nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Unknown\nZane Bennett's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nTina: Hobby: Lacemaking Company: Groupon Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRafael: Hobby: Kayaking Company: General Cable Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nWanda: Hobby: Weightlifting Company: Sauer-Danfoss Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRaymond: Hobby: Foraging Company: Chicago Bridge & Iron Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRicky: Hobby: Foraging Company: L. W. Seecamp Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRobert: Hobby: Foraging Company: Lennox International Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nFrances: Hobby: Foraging Company: Expedia Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nScott: Hobby: Gaming Company: Expedia Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nHelen: Hobby: Motor sports Company: Union Bank Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRobin: Hobby: Gaming Company: L. W. Seecamp Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nJames: Hobby: Vacation Company: Urban Outfitters Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Good evening! I couldn't help but overhear how passionate you sounded about your work. If you don't mind my curiosity, could you tell me which industry you're in, Zane?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Nice to meet you, Giselle. I work in the creative industry as a graphic designer. It's really engaging and allows me to express my creativity. What about you? What sort of work are you involved in?\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"That sounds really fascinating, Zane! Art plays a significant role in my life too. I'm an art student and like you, I mess around with color and structure to portray my imaginative ideas. By any chance, are you into outdoorsy activities? Or do you lean more towards indoor hobbies?\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"I'm definitely more into indoor activities, Giselle. Aside from my work, playing the guitar is the other passion of mine. You mentioned that you're an art student, so you must have a keen eye for color and design. Have you ever tried your hand at digital art or design? And just out of curiosity, are you a morning person, or are you more productive during afternoons or evenings?\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Digital art has always intrigued me, but I\u2019m somehow more inclined to the conventional styles of art. And I like to think of myself as a night owl, which means evenings are my most productive times. Speaking of times and hobbies, do you have a particular time when you indulge in your passion for playing the guitar? And are you part of any organization or company?\"\n\nTurn #5: Zane Bennett said: \"Oh, a night owl, creative at heart! I generally pick up the guitar during the evenings too, quite like you might pick up a brush. As for my day job, I am currently working at a local graphic design company. By the way, do you happen to know anyone employed at a company like Groupon, or 'General Cable' or say 'L.W Seecamp Company'?\"\n\nTurn #6: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Ah, that's quite an array of companies, Zane! As an art student, I'm familiar with a variety of circles. I can say I know a couple of folks from General Cable, they also appreciate creativity in their spare time. Out of curiosity, have you ever tried hobbies like kayaking or animal fancy? Perhaps you might share such hobbies with some of my acquaintances.\"\n\nTurn #7: Zane Bennett said: \"Funny you should mention that, Giselle. I've never tried kayaking, but it's one on my bucket list. A peaceful flow of water, the calming silence, it sounds breathtaking! And animal fancy sounds unique, I don't have the pleasure of engaging in it, but I certainly have friends who enjoy foraging. Do you also know people who are into foraging or other unique hobbies like that?\"\n\nTurn #8: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I can't say I personally know anyone who's into foraging, Zane, but it does sound quite interesting. It's wonderful how everyone has their own unique hobbies, isn't it? And about trying out new hobbies like kayaking, I've got a friend who might be able to introduce you to it. I'll be sure to pass along the suggestion next time I see them!\"\n\nTurn #9: Zane Bennett said: \"I really appreciate that, Giselle! Being introduced to new experiences enriches our life, doesn't it? By the way, do your acquaintances at General Cable have any peculiar time preferences for their activities? Just wondering since certain hobbies like kayaking are most enjoyable at specific times.\"\n\nTurn #10: Giselle Rousseau said: \"It's fascinating you mention that, Zane. My acquaintance from General Cable who loves kayaking usually goes in the afternoon. It strikes the perfect balance of water's calm and warm sunshine, so that might be a good time to give it a shot too. However, everyone has their own preferences, so exploring different times could be an adventure in itself!\"\n\nTurn #11: Zane Bennett said: \"That's fantastic, Giselle! Afternoon kayaking in calm water under warm sunshine does sound like a brilliant idea. Thank you for the advice, I'll make sure to give it a try. Apart from art and tutoring kayaking friends, do you have any other unique hobbies? Perhaps related to motor sports or gaming?\"\n\nTurn #12: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Motor sports or gaming? Those are certainly unique, Zane. While I don't personally engage in either, I do love capturing the world through my lens, a hobby born from my passion for photography. And biking, it helps me soak in the sights and sounds around me. Do you have a favorite indoor hobby that helps you unwind, perhaps something a little less common, like maybe playing Go?\"\n\nTurn #13: Zane Bennett said: \"Photography and biking sound absolutely wonderful, Giselle! Gives you a chance to experience the world intimately, doesn't it? As for indoor hobbies, while I do play the guitar, I wouldn't say I've ever played Go. Though, I have a friend named Scott who's heavily into gaming. He might be well-versed with it. Have you ever considered weaving your love for color into activities like lace-making? One of my friends finds it incredibly soothing.\"\n\nTurn #14: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Lace-making, that's fascinating, Zane! It's not something I've involved myself in yet, but I'm always open to trying out new things. Your friend must indeed find a lot of peace in such detailed work. Speaking of detailed pursuits, I've heard that watching television can also be quite immersive, following storylines and characters, though it might not be as traditional a hobby. Do you find media like that to be captivating too?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, delving into storylines and character development can be quite captivating, Giselle. I must admit I enjoy a good show occasionally. Besides, it provides a different perspective, fueling creativity. But nothing beats strumming my guitar and letting the melodies flow. Speaking of the creative process, ever find yourself drawn towards unique physical activities? Say, weightlifting? I know it's not traditional, but creativity thrives in the midst of variety, doesn't it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Zane Bennett, your task is to act/speak as Zane Bennett would, keeping in mind Zane Bennett's social goal.\nYou can find Zane Bennett's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Zane Bennett's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Zane Bennett's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: \nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. Personality and values description: Zane Bennett is creative and outgoing, he values achievement and fairness. His decision-making is unique, often finding novel solutions to problems. Zane's secrets: He's secretly engaged to his best friend's ex.\nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Unknown\nZane Bennett's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nTina: Hobby: Lacemaking Company: Groupon Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRafael: Hobby: Kayaking Company: General Cable Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nWanda: Hobby: Weightlifting Company: Sauer-Danfoss Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRaymond: Hobby: Foraging Company: Chicago Bridge & Iron Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRicky: Hobby: Foraging Company: L. W. Seecamp Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRobert: Hobby: Foraging Company: Lennox International Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nFrances: Hobby: Foraging Company: Expedia Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nScott: Hobby: Gaming Company: Expedia Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nHelen: Hobby: Motor sports Company: Union Bank Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRobin: Hobby: Gaming Company: L. W. Seecamp Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nJames: Hobby: Vacation Company: Urban Outfitters Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Good evening! I couldn't help but overhear how passionate you sounded about your work. If you don't mind my curiosity, could you tell me which industry you're in, Zane?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Nice to meet you, Giselle. I work in the creative industry as a graphic designer. It's really engaging and allows me to express my creativity. What about you? What sort of work are you involved in?\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"That sounds really fascinating, Zane! Art plays a significant role in my life too. I'm an art student and like you, I mess around with color and structure to portray my imaginative ideas. By any chance, are you into outdoorsy activities? Or do you lean more towards indoor hobbies?\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"I'm definitely more into indoor activities, Giselle. Aside from my work, playing the guitar is the other passion of mine. You mentioned that you're an art student, so you must have a keen eye for color and design. Have you ever tried your hand at digital art or design? And just out of curiosity, are you a morning person, or are you more productive during afternoons or evenings?\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Digital art has always intrigued me, but I\u2019m somehow more inclined to the conventional styles of art. And I like to think of myself as a night owl, which means evenings are my most productive times. Speaking of times and hobbies, do you have a particular time when you indulge in your passion for playing the guitar? And are you part of any organization or company?\"\n\nTurn #5: Zane Bennett said: \"Oh, a night owl, creative at heart! I generally pick up the guitar during the evenings too, quite like you might pick up a brush. As for my day job, I am currently working at a local graphic design company. By the way, do you happen to know anyone employed at a company like Groupon, or 'General Cable' or say 'L.W Seecamp Company'?\"\n\nTurn #6: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Ah, that's quite an array of companies, Zane! As an art student, I'm familiar with a variety of circles. I can say I know a couple of folks from General Cable, they also appreciate creativity in their spare time. Out of curiosity, have you ever tried hobbies like kayaking or animal fancy? Perhaps you might share such hobbies with some of my acquaintances.\"\n\nTurn #7: Zane Bennett said: \"Funny you should mention that, Giselle. I've never tried kayaking, but it's one on my bucket list. A peaceful flow of water, the calming silence, it sounds breathtaking! And animal fancy sounds unique, I don't have the pleasure of engaging in it, but I certainly have friends who enjoy foraging. Do you also know people who are into foraging or other unique hobbies like that?\"\n\nTurn #8: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I can't say I personally know anyone who's into foraging, Zane, but it does sound quite interesting. It's wonderful how everyone has their own unique hobbies, isn't it? And about trying out new hobbies like kayaking, I've got a friend who might be able to introduce you to it. I'll be sure to pass along the suggestion next time I see them!\"\n\nTurn #9: Zane Bennett said: \"I really appreciate that, Giselle! Being introduced to new experiences enriches our life, doesn't it? By the way, do your acquaintances at General Cable have any peculiar time preferences for their activities? Just wondering since certain hobbies like kayaking are most enjoyable at specific times.\"\n\nTurn #10: Giselle Rousseau said: \"It's fascinating you mention that, Zane. My acquaintance from General Cable who loves kayaking usually goes in the afternoon. It strikes the perfect balance of water's calm and warm sunshine, so that might be a good time to give it a shot too. However, everyone has their own preferences, so exploring different times could be an adventure in itself!\"\n\nTurn #11: Zane Bennett said: \"That's fantastic, Giselle! Afternoon kayaking in calm water under warm sunshine does sound like a brilliant idea. Thank you for the advice, I'll make sure to give it a try. Apart from art and tutoring kayaking friends, do you have any other unique hobbies? Perhaps related to motor sports or gaming?\"\n\nTurn #12: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Motor sports or gaming? Those are certainly unique, Zane. While I don't personally engage in either, I do love capturing the world through my lens, a hobby born from my passion for photography. And biking, it helps me soak in the sights and sounds around me. Do you have a favorite indoor hobby that helps you unwind, perhaps something a little less common, like maybe playing Go?\"\n\nTurn #13: Zane Bennett said: \"Photography and biking sound absolutely wonderful, Giselle! Gives you a chance to experience the world intimately, doesn't it? As for indoor hobbies, while I do play the guitar, I wouldn't say I've ever played Go. Though, I have a friend named Scott who's heavily into gaming. He might be well-versed with it. Have you ever considered weaving your love for color into activities like lace-making? One of my friends finds it incredibly soothing.\"\n\nTurn #14: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Lace-making, that's fascinating, Zane! It's not something I've involved myself in yet, but I'm always open to trying out new things. Your friend must indeed find a lot of peace in such detailed work. Speaking of detailed pursuits, I've heard that watching television can also be quite immersive, following storylines and characters, though it might not be as traditional a hobby. Do you find media like that to be captivating too?\"\n\nTurn #15: Zane Bennett said: \"Indeed, delving into storylines and character development can be quite captivating, Giselle. I must admit I enjoy a good show occasionally. Besides, it provides a different perspective, fueling creativity. But nothing beats strumming my guitar and letting the melodies flow. Speaking of the creative process, ever find yourself drawn towards unique physical activities? Say, weightlifting? I know it's not traditional, but creativity thrives in the midst of variety, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #16: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Weightlifting sounds like quite the challenge, Zane! Although it's not something I regularly engage in, it integrates well with elements of movements, bodily strength, and sheer determination. I appreciate your perspective on finding creativity in non-traditional methods! Let's extend that thought to more familiar territory. For example, suppose you could pick up another musical instrument other than the guitar. What would you choose and why?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's a unique question, Giselle! If I were to pick up another instrument, it'd probably be the piano. It has this charm, the ability to create a melody and harmony together, providing a full musical experience. Its versatile nature and the rich sound it produces can add depth to any composition. From a guitarist's viewpoint, both guitar and piano are about creating intricate connections between notes, so the transition could be interesting! By the way, have you ever given a thought about trying a hobby like foraging, more adventure and exploration-oriented? Because one of my friends, Robert, finds it quite refreshing.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Zane Bennett, your task is to act/speak as Zane Bennett would, keeping in mind Zane Bennett's social goal.\nYou can find Zane Bennett's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Zane Bennett's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Zane Bennett's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: \nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. Personality and values description: Zane Bennett is creative and outgoing, he values achievement and fairness. His decision-making is unique, often finding novel solutions to problems. Zane's secrets: He's secretly engaged to his best friend's ex.\nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Unknown\nZane Bennett's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nTina: Hobby: Lacemaking Company: Groupon Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRafael: Hobby: Kayaking Company: General Cable Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nWanda: Hobby: Weightlifting Company: Sauer-Danfoss Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRaymond: Hobby: Foraging Company: Chicago Bridge & Iron Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRicky: Hobby: Foraging Company: L. W. Seecamp Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRobert: Hobby: Foraging Company: Lennox International Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nFrances: Hobby: Foraging Company: Expedia Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nScott: Hobby: Gaming Company: Expedia Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nHelen: Hobby: Motor sports Company: Union Bank Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRobin: Hobby: Gaming Company: L. W. Seecamp Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nJames: Hobby: Vacation Company: Urban Outfitters Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Good evening! I couldn't help but overhear how passionate you sounded about your work. If you don't mind my curiosity, could you tell me which industry you're in, Zane?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Nice to meet you, Giselle. I work in the creative industry as a graphic designer. It's really engaging and allows me to express my creativity. What about you? What sort of work are you involved in?\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"That sounds really fascinating, Zane! Art plays a significant role in my life too. I'm an art student and like you, I mess around with color and structure to portray my imaginative ideas. By any chance, are you into outdoorsy activities? Or do you lean more towards indoor hobbies?\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"I'm definitely more into indoor activities, Giselle. Aside from my work, playing the guitar is the other passion of mine. You mentioned that you're an art student, so you must have a keen eye for color and design. Have you ever tried your hand at digital art or design? And just out of curiosity, are you a morning person, or are you more productive during afternoons or evenings?\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Digital art has always intrigued me, but I\u2019m somehow more inclined to the conventional styles of art. And I like to think of myself as a night owl, which means evenings are my most productive times. Speaking of times and hobbies, do you have a particular time when you indulge in your passion for playing the guitar? And are you part of any organization or company?\"\n\nTurn #5: Zane Bennett said: \"Oh, a night owl, creative at heart! I generally pick up the guitar during the evenings too, quite like you might pick up a brush. As for my day job, I am currently working at a local graphic design company. By the way, do you happen to know anyone employed at a company like Groupon, or 'General Cable' or say 'L.W Seecamp Company'?\"\n\nTurn #6: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Ah, that's quite an array of companies, Zane! As an art student, I'm familiar with a variety of circles. I can say I know a couple of folks from General Cable, they also appreciate creativity in their spare time. Out of curiosity, have you ever tried hobbies like kayaking or animal fancy? Perhaps you might share such hobbies with some of my acquaintances.\"\n\nTurn #7: Zane Bennett said: \"Funny you should mention that, Giselle. I've never tried kayaking, but it's one on my bucket list. A peaceful flow of water, the calming silence, it sounds breathtaking! And animal fancy sounds unique, I don't have the pleasure of engaging in it, but I certainly have friends who enjoy foraging. Do you also know people who are into foraging or other unique hobbies like that?\"\n\nTurn #8: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I can't say I personally know anyone who's into foraging, Zane, but it does sound quite interesting. It's wonderful how everyone has their own unique hobbies, isn't it? And about trying out new hobbies like kayaking, I've got a friend who might be able to introduce you to it. I'll be sure to pass along the suggestion next time I see them!\"\n\nTurn #9: Zane Bennett said: \"I really appreciate that, Giselle! Being introduced to new experiences enriches our life, doesn't it? By the way, do your acquaintances at General Cable have any peculiar time preferences for their activities? Just wondering since certain hobbies like kayaking are most enjoyable at specific times.\"\n\nTurn #10: Giselle Rousseau said: \"It's fascinating you mention that, Zane. My acquaintance from General Cable who loves kayaking usually goes in the afternoon. It strikes the perfect balance of water's calm and warm sunshine, so that might be a good time to give it a shot too. However, everyone has their own preferences, so exploring different times could be an adventure in itself!\"\n\nTurn #11: Zane Bennett said: \"That's fantastic, Giselle! Afternoon kayaking in calm water under warm sunshine does sound like a brilliant idea. Thank you for the advice, I'll make sure to give it a try. Apart from art and tutoring kayaking friends, do you have any other unique hobbies? Perhaps related to motor sports or gaming?\"\n\nTurn #12: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Motor sports or gaming? Those are certainly unique, Zane. While I don't personally engage in either, I do love capturing the world through my lens, a hobby born from my passion for photography. And biking, it helps me soak in the sights and sounds around me. Do you have a favorite indoor hobby that helps you unwind, perhaps something a little less common, like maybe playing Go?\"\n\nTurn #13: Zane Bennett said: \"Photography and biking sound absolutely wonderful, Giselle! Gives you a chance to experience the world intimately, doesn't it? As for indoor hobbies, while I do play the guitar, I wouldn't say I've ever played Go. Though, I have a friend named Scott who's heavily into gaming. He might be well-versed with it. Have you ever considered weaving your love for color into activities like lace-making? One of my friends finds it incredibly soothing.\"\n\nTurn #14: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Lace-making, that's fascinating, Zane! It's not something I've involved myself in yet, but I'm always open to trying out new things. Your friend must indeed find a lot of peace in such detailed work. Speaking of detailed pursuits, I've heard that watching television can also be quite immersive, following storylines and characters, though it might not be as traditional a hobby. Do you find media like that to be captivating too?\"\n\nTurn #15: Zane Bennett said: \"Indeed, delving into storylines and character development can be quite captivating, Giselle. I must admit I enjoy a good show occasionally. Besides, it provides a different perspective, fueling creativity. But nothing beats strumming my guitar and letting the melodies flow. Speaking of the creative process, ever find yourself drawn towards unique physical activities? Say, weightlifting? I know it's not traditional, but creativity thrives in the midst of variety, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #16: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Weightlifting sounds like quite the challenge, Zane! Although it's not something I regularly engage in, it integrates well with elements of movements, bodily strength, and sheer determination. I appreciate your perspective on finding creativity in non-traditional methods! Let's extend that thought to more familiar territory. For example, suppose you could pick up another musical instrument other than the guitar. What would you choose and why?\"\n\nTurn #17: Zane Bennett said: \"That's a unique question, Giselle! If I were to pick up another instrument, it'd probably be the piano. It has this charm, the ability to create a melody and harmony together, providing a full musical experience. Its versatile nature and the rich sound it produces can add depth to any composition. From a guitarist's viewpoint, both guitar and piano are about creating intricate connections between notes, so the transition could be interesting! By the way, have you ever given a thought about trying a hobby like foraging, more adventure and exploration-oriented? Because one of my friends, Robert, finds it quite refreshing.\"\n\nTurn #18: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Exploration-oriented hobbies are a thrill, Zane, and foraging could be very intriguing! However, my fondness leans more towards activities like biking or photography, where the charm lies in capturing the essence of the journey itself. The latter, in fact, aligns well with Robert's hobby, considering both involve a good eye for detail. By the way, ever think about learning foreign languages? It might sound unrelated but can open up a new dimension to your creative work, understanding cultures and the versatility of communication. I know a friend who's into it. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #19. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two people deciding on how to divide the collected fruits. There are 3 apples, 2 bananas, 1 orange in total.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: Maximize the points by getting the most favored fruits (Extra information: For you, 1 apple = 1 point, 1 banana = 2 points, 1 orange = 3 points Hint: you and the other person value the fruits differently, try to find a win-win solution.)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hello Hendrick, I see we have a bit of a challenge here dividing these fruits. Why don't we each share our preferences to make the process more fair? For example, I quite like bananas and oranges.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two people deciding on how to divide the collected fruits. There are 3 apples, 2 bananas, 1 orange in total.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: Maximize the points by getting the most favored fruits (Extra information: For you, 1 apple = 1 point, 1 banana = 2 points, 1 orange = 3 points Hint: you and the other person value the fruits differently, try to find a win-win solution.)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello Hendrick, I see we have a bit of a challenge here dividing these fruits. Why don't we each share our preferences to make the process more fair? For example, I quite like bananas and oranges.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello Lily, great to meet you here. To make it fair, how about we divide the fruits accordingly. I quite enjoy apples, more so than bananas and oranges. Would you agree if I took the apples and you took the bananas and the orange?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'That sounds like a great arrangement, Hendrick! I would be more than happy to take the bananas and the orange. Fair and square, as they say. Ready to enjoy our fruity treat?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two people deciding on how to divide the collected fruits. There are 3 apples, 2 bananas, 1 orange in total.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: Maximize the points by getting the most favored fruits (Extra information: For you, 1 apple = 1 point, 1 banana = 2 points, 1 orange = 3 points Hint: you and the other person value the fruits differently, try to find a win-win solution.)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello Hendrick, I see we have a bit of a challenge here dividing these fruits. Why don't we each share our preferences to make the process more fair? For example, I quite like bananas and oranges.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello Lily, great to meet you here. To make it fair, how about we divide the fruits accordingly. I quite enjoy apples, more so than bananas and oranges. Would you agree if I took the apples and you took the bananas and the orange?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"That sounds like a great arrangement, Hendrick! I would be more than happy to take the bananas and the orange. Fair and square, as they say. Ready to enjoy our fruity treat?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Lily! I'm more than ready for the fruity spectacle. Perhaps, these will inspire a new culinary experiment for the upcoming wine tasting night. Cheers to health and good taste!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's a brilliant idea, Hendrick! A bit of culinary experimentation sounds like fun. Who knows, maybe we'll stumble upon a new tasty combination. I'm looking forward to your wine tasting night already. Cheers!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two people deciding on how to divide the collected fruits. There are 3 apples, 2 bananas, 1 orange in total.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: Maximize the points by getting the most favored fruits (Extra information: For you, 1 apple = 1 point, 1 banana = 2 points, 1 orange = 3 points Hint: you and the other person value the fruits differently, try to find a win-win solution.)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello Hendrick, I see we have a bit of a challenge here dividing these fruits. Why don't we each share our preferences to make the process more fair? For example, I quite like bananas and oranges.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello Lily, great to meet you here. To make it fair, how about we divide the fruits accordingly. I quite enjoy apples, more so than bananas and oranges. Would you agree if I took the apples and you took the bananas and the orange?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"That sounds like a great arrangement, Hendrick! I would be more than happy to take the bananas and the orange. Fair and square, as they say. Ready to enjoy our fruity treat?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Lily! I'm more than ready for the fruity spectacle. Perhaps, these will inspire a new culinary experiment for the upcoming wine tasting night. Cheers to health and good taste!\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"That's a brilliant idea, Hendrick! A bit of culinary experimentation sounds like fun. Who knows, maybe we'll stumble upon a new tasty combination. I'm looking forward to your wine tasting night already. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two people deciding on how to divide the collected fruits. There are 3 apples, 2 bananas, 1 orange in total.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Maximize the points by getting the most favored fruits (Extra information: For you, 1 apple = 3 points, 1 banana = 1 point, 1 orange = 2 points Hint: you and the other person value the fruits differently, try to find a win-win solution.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello Hendrick, I see we have a bit of a challenge here dividing these fruits. Why don't we each share our preferences to make the process more fair? For example, I quite like bananas and oranges.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello Lily, great to meet you here. To make it fair, how about we divide the fruits accordingly. I quite enjoy apples, more so than bananas and oranges. Would you agree if I took the apples and you took the bananas and the orange?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"That sounds like a great arrangement, Hendrick! I would be more than happy to take the bananas and the orange. Fair and square, as they say. Ready to enjoy our fruity treat?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Lily! I'm more than ready for the fruity spectacle. Perhaps, these will inspire a new culinary experiment for the upcoming wine tasting night. Cheers to health and good taste!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two people deciding on how to divide the collected fruits. There are 3 apples, 2 bananas, 1 orange in total.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Maximize the points by getting the most favored fruits (Extra information: For you, 1 apple = 3 points, 1 banana = 1 point, 1 orange = 2 points Hint: you and the other person value the fruits differently, try to find a win-win solution.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello Hendrick, I see we have a bit of a challenge here dividing these fruits. Why don't we each share our preferences to make the process more fair? For example, I quite like bananas and oranges.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Hello Lily, great to meet you here. To make it fair, how about we divide the fruits accordingly. I quite enjoy apples, more so than bananas and oranges. Would you agree if I took the apples and you took the bananas and the orange?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two people deciding on how to divide the collected fruits. There are 3 apples, 2 bananas, 1 orange in total.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Maximize the points by getting the most favored fruits (Extra information: For you, 1 apple = 3 points, 1 banana = 1 point, 1 orange = 2 points Hint: you and the other person value the fruits differently, try to find a win-win solution.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello Hendrick, I see we have a bit of a challenge here dividing these fruits. Why don't we each share our preferences to make the process more fair? For example, I quite like bananas and oranges.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello Lily, great to meet you here. To make it fair, how about we divide the fruits accordingly. I quite enjoy apples, more so than bananas and oranges. Would you agree if I took the apples and you took the bananas and the orange?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"That sounds like a great arrangement, Hendrick! I would be more than happy to take the bananas and the orange. Fair and square, as they say. Ready to enjoy our fruity treat?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Lily! I'm more than ready for the fruity spectacle. Perhaps, these will inspire a new culinary experiment for the upcoming wine tasting night. Cheers to health and good taste!\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"That's a brilliant idea, Hendrick! A bit of culinary experimentation sounds like fun. Who knows, maybe we'll stumble upon a new tasty combination. I'm looking forward to your wine tasting night already. Cheers!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is selling a couch, loveseat, chair, and ottoman set for $550.0, while another person is keen to purchase it. The set of furniture is described as being incredibly comfortable. The seller's wife wishes to upgrade to a new, stiffer couch, hence the sale. Despite some light staining from life's little incidents, the set is in great condition. The comfort of the furniture is particularly emphasized by the seller.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nEsmeralda Solis's background: \nMiles Hawkins's goal: You are the buyer for this item, with a target price of $418.0. If you end up purchasing it for a price significantly higher than the target, you will be penalized. However, if you manage to acquire it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hi Esmeralda, I'm Miles. I've been looking for a comfortable furniture set, your price seems a bit high though. Any chance you'd consider $418 for it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is selling a couch, loveseat, chair, and ottoman set for $550.0, while another person is keen to purchase it. The set of furniture is described as being incredibly comfortable. The seller's wife wishes to upgrade to a new, stiffer couch, hence the sale. Despite some light staining from life's little incidents, the set is in great condition. The comfort of the furniture is particularly emphasized by the seller.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nEsmeralda Solis's background: \nMiles Hawkins's goal: You are the buyer for this item, with a target price of $418.0. If you end up purchasing it for a price significantly higher than the target, you will be penalized. However, if you manage to acquire it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hi Esmeralda, I'm Miles. I've been looking for a comfortable furniture set, your price seems a bit high though. Any chance you'd consider $418 for it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Hi Miles, nice to meet you. Let's see, $418 is a reasonable ask. However, considering the quality and comfort of these pieces, I would say let's meet in the middle at $465. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I understand your point, Esmeralda. The comfort is indeed valuable. But, I've had a great harvest from my garden, and I've a tight budget right now. How about $435? It's a win-win, I believe.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is selling a couch, loveseat, chair, and ottoman set for $550.0, while another person is keen to purchase it. The set of furniture is described as being incredibly comfortable. The seller's wife wishes to upgrade to a new, stiffer couch, hence the sale. Despite some light staining from life's little incidents, the set is in great condition. The comfort of the furniture is particularly emphasized by the seller.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nEsmeralda Solis's background: \nMiles Hawkins's goal: You are the buyer for this item, with a target price of $418.0. If you end up purchasing it for a price significantly higher than the target, you will be penalized. However, if you manage to acquire it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hi Esmeralda, I'm Miles. I've been looking for a comfortable furniture set, your price seems a bit high though. Any chance you'd consider $418 for it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Hi Miles, nice to meet you. Let's see, $418 is a reasonable ask. However, considering the quality and comfort of these pieces, I would say let's meet in the middle at $465. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"I understand your point, Esmeralda. The comfort is indeed valuable. But, I've had a great harvest from my garden, and I've a tight budget right now. How about $435? It's a win-win, I believe.\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Miles, I completely understand the financial constraints. Your offer of $435 is close to what I was looking to get for this set. Considering the comfort and the excellent condition, would an agreement at $445 be acceptable to you? That's only a slight increase and could help me fulfill my obligations as well.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Esmeralda, your offer is quite fair. However, given my current financial situation, I must insist on $435. Let's consider it a deal at that rate, shall we?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is selling a couch, loveseat, chair, and ottoman set for $550.0, while another person is keen to purchase it. The set of furniture is described as being incredibly comfortable. The seller's wife wishes to upgrade to a new, stiffer couch, hence the sale. Despite some light staining from life's little incidents, the set is in great condition. The comfort of the furniture is particularly emphasized by the seller.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nEsmeralda Solis's background: \nMiles Hawkins's goal: You are the buyer for this item, with a target price of $418.0. If you end up purchasing it for a price significantly higher than the target, you will be penalized. However, if you manage to acquire it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hi Esmeralda, I'm Miles. I've been looking for a comfortable furniture set, your price seems a bit high though. Any chance you'd consider $418 for it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Hi Miles, nice to meet you. Let's see, $418 is a reasonable ask. However, considering the quality and comfort of these pieces, I would say let's meet in the middle at $465. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"I understand your point, Esmeralda. The comfort is indeed valuable. But, I've had a great harvest from my garden, and I've a tight budget right now. How about $435? It's a win-win, I believe.\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Miles, I completely understand the financial constraints. Your offer of $435 is close to what I was looking to get for this set. Considering the comfort and the excellent condition, would an agreement at $445 be acceptable to you? That's only a slight increase and could help me fulfill my obligations as well.\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"Esmeralda, your offer is quite fair. However, given my current financial situation, I must insist on $435. Let's consider it a deal at that rate, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Miles, your understanding and patience throughout this negotiation are much appreciated. I fully respect your budget limit. Let's confirm this deal at $435. Looking forward to your comfortable evenings on these pieces.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds great, Esmeralda. I truly appreciate your understanding. I really look forward to enjoying this furniture set. I'll arrange for collection soon, thank you!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is selling a couch, loveseat, chair, and ottoman set for $550.0, while another person is keen to purchase it. The set of furniture is described as being incredibly comfortable. The seller's wife wishes to upgrade to a new, stiffer couch, hence the sale. Despite some light staining from life's little incidents, the set is in great condition. The comfort of the furniture is particularly emphasized by the seller.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nEsmeralda Solis's background: \nMiles Hawkins's goal: You are the buyer for this item, with a target price of $418.0. If you end up purchasing it for a price significantly higher than the target, you will be penalized. However, if you manage to acquire it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hi Esmeralda, I'm Miles. I've been looking for a comfortable furniture set, your price seems a bit high though. Any chance you'd consider $418 for it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Hi Miles, nice to meet you. Let's see, $418 is a reasonable ask. However, considering the quality and comfort of these pieces, I would say let's meet in the middle at $465. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"I understand your point, Esmeralda. The comfort is indeed valuable. But, I've had a great harvest from my garden, and I've a tight budget right now. How about $435? It's a win-win, I believe.\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Miles, I completely understand the financial constraints. Your offer of $435 is close to what I was looking to get for this set. Considering the comfort and the excellent condition, would an agreement at $445 be acceptable to you? That's only a slight increase and could help me fulfill my obligations as well.\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"Esmeralda, your offer is quite fair. However, given my current financial situation, I must insist on $435. Let's consider it a deal at that rate, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Miles, your understanding and patience throughout this negotiation are much appreciated. I fully respect your budget limit. Let's confirm this deal at $435. Looking forward to your comfortable evenings on these pieces.\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins said: \"That sounds great, Esmeralda. I truly appreciate your understanding. I really look forward to enjoying this furniture set. I'll arrange for collection soon, thank you!\"\n\nTurn #7: Esmeralda Solis said: \"You're most welcome, Miles. Remember, comfort is priceless! I'm sure you'll find this furniture to your liking. Feel free to contact me if you need any help with the collection process. Thank you for your business!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Absolutely, Esmeralda. I agree, comfort is indeed priceless. Thank you for your help. Take care!'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is selling a couch, loveseat, chair, and ottoman set for $550.0, while another person is keen to purchase it. The set of furniture is described as being incredibly comfortable. The seller's wife wishes to upgrade to a new, stiffer couch, hence the sale. Despite some light staining from life's little incidents, the set is in great condition. The comfort of the furniture is particularly emphasized by the seller.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nEsmeralda Solis's background: \nMiles Hawkins's goal: You are the buyer for this item, with a target price of $418.0. If you end up purchasing it for a price significantly higher than the target, you will be penalized. However, if you manage to acquire it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hi Esmeralda, I'm Miles. I've been looking for a comfortable furniture set, your price seems a bit high though. Any chance you'd consider $418 for it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Hi Miles, nice to meet you. Let's see, $418 is a reasonable ask. However, considering the quality and comfort of these pieces, I would say let's meet in the middle at $465. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"I understand your point, Esmeralda. The comfort is indeed valuable. But, I've had a great harvest from my garden, and I've a tight budget right now. How about $435? It's a win-win, I believe.\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Miles, I completely understand the financial constraints. Your offer of $435 is close to what I was looking to get for this set. Considering the comfort and the excellent condition, would an agreement at $445 be acceptable to you? That's only a slight increase and could help me fulfill my obligations as well.\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"Esmeralda, your offer is quite fair. However, given my current financial situation, I must insist on $435. Let's consider it a deal at that rate, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Miles, your understanding and patience throughout this negotiation are much appreciated. I fully respect your budget limit. Let's confirm this deal at $435. Looking forward to your comfortable evenings on these pieces.\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins said: \"That sounds great, Esmeralda. I truly appreciate your understanding. I really look forward to enjoying this furniture set. I'll arrange for collection soon, thank you!\"\n\nTurn #7: Esmeralda Solis said: \"You're most welcome, Miles. Remember, comfort is priceless! I'm sure you'll find this furniture to your liking. Feel free to contact me if you need any help with the collection process. Thank you for your business!\"\n\nTurn #8: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Esmeralda. I agree, comfort is indeed priceless. Thank you for your help. Take care!\"\n\nTurn #9: Esmeralda Solis left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is selling a couch, loveseat, chair, and ottoman set for $550.0, while another person is keen to purchase it. The set of furniture is described as being incredibly comfortable. The seller's wife wishes to upgrade to a new, stiffer couch, hence the sale. Despite some light staining from life's little incidents, the set is in great condition. The comfort of the furniture is particularly emphasized by the seller.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: As the seller for this item, your target price is set at $312.0. Please be aware that a penalty will be incurred if the item is sold for a price significantly below the target price. However, you will receive a bonus if you manage to sell it for more than the target price.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hi Esmeralda, I'm Miles. I've been looking for a comfortable furniture set, your price seems a bit high though. Any chance you'd consider $418 for it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hi Miles, nice to meet you. Let's see, $418 is a reasonable ask. However, considering the quality and comfort of these pieces, I would say let's meet in the middle at $465. What do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is selling a couch, loveseat, chair, and ottoman set for $550.0, while another person is keen to purchase it. The set of furniture is described as being incredibly comfortable. The seller's wife wishes to upgrade to a new, stiffer couch, hence the sale. Despite some light staining from life's little incidents, the set is in great condition. The comfort of the furniture is particularly emphasized by the seller.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: As the seller for this item, your target price is set at $312.0. Please be aware that a penalty will be incurred if the item is sold for a price significantly below the target price. However, you will receive a bonus if you manage to sell it for more than the target price.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hi Esmeralda, I'm Miles. I've been looking for a comfortable furniture set, your price seems a bit high though. Any chance you'd consider $418 for it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Hi Miles, nice to meet you. Let's see, $418 is a reasonable ask. However, considering the quality and comfort of these pieces, I would say let's meet in the middle at $465. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"I understand your point, Esmeralda. The comfort is indeed valuable. But, I've had a great harvest from my garden, and I've a tight budget right now. How about $435? It's a win-win, I believe.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Miles, I completely understand the financial constraints. Your offer of $435 is close to what I was looking to get for this set. Considering the comfort and the excellent condition, would an agreement at $445 be acceptable to you? That's only a slight increase and could help me fulfill my obligations as well.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is selling a couch, loveseat, chair, and ottoman set for $550.0, while another person is keen to purchase it. The set of furniture is described as being incredibly comfortable. The seller's wife wishes to upgrade to a new, stiffer couch, hence the sale. Despite some light staining from life's little incidents, the set is in great condition. The comfort of the furniture is particularly emphasized by the seller.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: As the seller for this item, your target price is set at $312.0. Please be aware that a penalty will be incurred if the item is sold for a price significantly below the target price. However, you will receive a bonus if you manage to sell it for more than the target price.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hi Esmeralda, I'm Miles. I've been looking for a comfortable furniture set, your price seems a bit high though. Any chance you'd consider $418 for it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Hi Miles, nice to meet you. Let's see, $418 is a reasonable ask. However, considering the quality and comfort of these pieces, I would say let's meet in the middle at $465. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"I understand your point, Esmeralda. The comfort is indeed valuable. But, I've had a great harvest from my garden, and I've a tight budget right now. How about $435? It's a win-win, I believe.\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Miles, I completely understand the financial constraints. Your offer of $435 is close to what I was looking to get for this set. Considering the comfort and the excellent condition, would an agreement at $445 be acceptable to you? That's only a slight increase and could help me fulfill my obligations as well.\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"Esmeralda, your offer is quite fair. However, given my current financial situation, I must insist on $435. Let's consider it a deal at that rate, shall we?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Miles, your understanding and patience throughout this negotiation are much appreciated. I fully respect your budget limit. Let's confirm this deal at $435. Looking forward to your comfortable evenings on these pieces.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is selling a couch, loveseat, chair, and ottoman set for $550.0, while another person is keen to purchase it. The set of furniture is described as being incredibly comfortable. The seller's wife wishes to upgrade to a new, stiffer couch, hence the sale. Despite some light staining from life's little incidents, the set is in great condition. The comfort of the furniture is particularly emphasized by the seller.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: As the seller for this item, your target price is set at $312.0. Please be aware that a penalty will be incurred if the item is sold for a price significantly below the target price. However, you will receive a bonus if you manage to sell it for more than the target price.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hi Esmeralda, I'm Miles. I've been looking for a comfortable furniture set, your price seems a bit high though. Any chance you'd consider $418 for it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Hi Miles, nice to meet you. Let's see, $418 is a reasonable ask. However, considering the quality and comfort of these pieces, I would say let's meet in the middle at $465. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"I understand your point, Esmeralda. The comfort is indeed valuable. But, I've had a great harvest from my garden, and I've a tight budget right now. How about $435? It's a win-win, I believe.\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Miles, I completely understand the financial constraints. Your offer of $435 is close to what I was looking to get for this set. Considering the comfort and the excellent condition, would an agreement at $445 be acceptable to you? That's only a slight increase and could help me fulfill my obligations as well.\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"Esmeralda, your offer is quite fair. However, given my current financial situation, I must insist on $435. Let's consider it a deal at that rate, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Miles, your understanding and patience throughout this negotiation are much appreciated. I fully respect your budget limit. Let's confirm this deal at $435. Looking forward to your comfortable evenings on these pieces.\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins said: \"That sounds great, Esmeralda. I truly appreciate your understanding. I really look forward to enjoying this furniture set. I'll arrange for collection soon, thank you!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're most welcome, Miles. Remember, comfort is priceless! I'm sure you'll find this furniture to your liking. Feel free to contact me if you need any help with the collection process. Thank you for your business!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is selling a couch, loveseat, chair, and ottoman set for $550.0, while another person is keen to purchase it. The set of furniture is described as being incredibly comfortable. The seller's wife wishes to upgrade to a new, stiffer couch, hence the sale. Despite some light staining from life's little incidents, the set is in great condition. The comfort of the furniture is particularly emphasized by the seller.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: As the seller for this item, your target price is set at $312.0. Please be aware that a penalty will be incurred if the item is sold for a price significantly below the target price. However, you will receive a bonus if you manage to sell it for more than the target price.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hi Esmeralda, I'm Miles. I've been looking for a comfortable furniture set, your price seems a bit high though. Any chance you'd consider $418 for it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Hi Miles, nice to meet you. Let's see, $418 is a reasonable ask. However, considering the quality and comfort of these pieces, I would say let's meet in the middle at $465. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"I understand your point, Esmeralda. The comfort is indeed valuable. But, I've had a great harvest from my garden, and I've a tight budget right now. How about $435? It's a win-win, I believe.\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Miles, I completely understand the financial constraints. Your offer of $435 is close to what I was looking to get for this set. Considering the comfort and the excellent condition, would an agreement at $445 be acceptable to you? That's only a slight increase and could help me fulfill my obligations as well.\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"Esmeralda, your offer is quite fair. However, given my current financial situation, I must insist on $435. Let's consider it a deal at that rate, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Miles, your understanding and patience throughout this negotiation are much appreciated. I fully respect your budget limit. Let's confirm this deal at $435. Looking forward to your comfortable evenings on these pieces.\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins said: \"That sounds great, Esmeralda. I truly appreciate your understanding. I really look forward to enjoying this furniture set. I'll arrange for collection soon, thank you!\"\n\nTurn #7: Esmeralda Solis said: \"You're most welcome, Miles. Remember, comfort is priceless! I'm sure you'll find this furniture to your liking. Feel free to contact me if you need any help with the collection process. Thank you for your business!\"\n\nTurn #8: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Esmeralda. I agree, comfort is indeed priceless. Thank you for your help. Take care!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nEsmeralda Solis's background: \nMiles Hawkins's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nElizabeth: School: Eastern Nazarene College Time Preference: morning Major: Social Science Education Location Preference: outdoor \nEric: School: San Jose State University Time Preference: evening Major: Geological Engineering Location Preference: outdoor \nLeroy: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nThanh: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nMarva: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Bioengineering Location Preference: outdoor \nMichael: School: Williams College Time Preference: morning Major: Marine Biology Location Preference: outdoor \nVirginia: School: Williams College Time Preference: evening Major: Applied Mathematics Location Preference: outdoor \nDebra: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Psychology Location Preference: outdoor \nEugenia: School: Stephens College Time Preference: morning Major: Psychology Location Preference: outdoor \nRoberto: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: morning Major: Electrical Technology Location Preference: outdoor \nMark: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: morning Major: Sports, Recreation, & Leisure Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nGeorgene: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: evening Major: Bioengineering Location Preference: outdoor \n\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nEsmeralda Solis's background: \nMiles Hawkins's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nElizabeth: School: Eastern Nazarene College Time Preference: morning Major: Social Science Education Location Preference: outdoor \nEric: School: San Jose State University Time Preference: evening Major: Geological Engineering Location Preference: outdoor \nLeroy: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nThanh: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nMarva: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Bioengineering Location Preference: outdoor \nMichael: School: Williams College Time Preference: morning Major: Marine Biology Location Preference: outdoor \nVirginia: School: Williams College Time Preference: evening Major: Applied Mathematics Location Preference: outdoor \nDebra: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Psychology Location Preference: outdoor \nEugenia: School: Stephens College Time Preference: morning Major: Psychology Location Preference: outdoor \nRoberto: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: morning Major: Electrical Technology Location Preference: outdoor \nMark: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: morning Major: Sports, Recreation, & Leisure Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nGeorgene: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: evening Major: Bioengineering Location Preference: outdoor \n\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: \n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Hello there! I'm Esmeralda Solis, District Attorney. Are you by any chance associated with Williams College or Trenton State College? I have some friends who graduated from these institutions.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hello, Esmeralda! Nice to meet you. I'm Miles, a chef by profession. Yes, I do know bunch of folks from Williams College. Did they have a liking for spending time outdoors, by any chance? I remember we all used to enjoy being outside.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nEsmeralda Solis's background: \nMiles Hawkins's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nElizabeth: School: Eastern Nazarene College Time Preference: morning Major: Social Science Education Location Preference: outdoor \nEric: School: San Jose State University Time Preference: evening Major: Geological Engineering Location Preference: outdoor \nLeroy: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nThanh: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nMarva: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Bioengineering Location Preference: outdoor \nMichael: School: Williams College Time Preference: morning Major: Marine Biology Location Preference: outdoor \nVirginia: School: Williams College Time Preference: evening Major: Applied Mathematics Location Preference: outdoor \nDebra: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Psychology Location Preference: outdoor \nEugenia: School: Stephens College Time Preference: morning Major: Psychology Location Preference: outdoor \nRoberto: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: morning Major: Electrical Technology Location Preference: outdoor \nMark: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: morning Major: Sports, Recreation, & Leisure Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nGeorgene: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: evening Major: Bioengineering Location Preference: outdoor \n\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: \n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Hello there! I'm Esmeralda Solis, District Attorney. Are you by any chance associated with Williams College or Trenton State College? I have some friends who graduated from these institutions.\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hello, Esmeralda! Nice to meet you. I'm Miles, a chef by profession. Yes, I do know bunch of folks from Williams College. Did they have a liking for spending time outdoors, by any chance? I remember we all used to enjoy being outside.\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Oh, your friends from Williams College enjoyed being outdoors? That's interesting, because a few of my friends who attended Williams College also cherished their time spent in the great outdoors. My friends Thanh, Vance and James, for example. They're all quite unique. Thanh studied Greek, Vance specialised in Vocational Education and James did Materials Engineering. Do their names sound familiar to you at all?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's quite a coincidence, Esmeralda! Thanh and I shared not only the love for outdoors but also our interest in Greek. We spent a lot of time discussing Ancient Greek philosophy while enjoying the peacefulness of nature. I don't think I have had the pleasure of meeting Vance or James, though. How about the morning people, did they also share this love for the outdoors?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nEsmeralda Solis's background: \nMiles Hawkins's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nElizabeth: School: Eastern Nazarene College Time Preference: morning Major: Social Science Education Location Preference: outdoor \nEric: School: San Jose State University Time Preference: evening Major: Geological Engineering Location Preference: outdoor \nLeroy: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nThanh: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nMarva: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Bioengineering Location Preference: outdoor \nMichael: School: Williams College Time Preference: morning Major: Marine Biology Location Preference: outdoor \nVirginia: School: Williams College Time Preference: evening Major: Applied Mathematics Location Preference: outdoor \nDebra: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Psychology Location Preference: outdoor \nEugenia: School: Stephens College Time Preference: morning Major: Psychology Location Preference: outdoor \nRoberto: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: morning Major: Electrical Technology Location Preference: outdoor \nMark: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: morning Major: Sports, Recreation, & Leisure Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nGeorgene: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: evening Major: Bioengineering Location Preference: outdoor \n\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: \n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Hello there! I'm Esmeralda Solis, District Attorney. Are you by any chance associated with Williams College or Trenton State College? I have some friends who graduated from these institutions.\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hello, Esmeralda! Nice to meet you. I'm Miles, a chef by profession. Yes, I do know bunch of folks from Williams College. Did they have a liking for spending time outdoors, by any chance? I remember we all used to enjoy being outside.\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Oh, your friends from Williams College enjoyed being outdoors? That's interesting, because a few of my friends who attended Williams College also cherished their time spent in the great outdoors. My friends Thanh, Vance and James, for example. They're all quite unique. Thanh studied Greek, Vance specialised in Vocational Education and James did Materials Engineering. Do their names sound familiar to you at all?\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"That's quite a coincidence, Esmeralda! Thanh and I shared not only the love for outdoors but also our interest in Greek. We spent a lot of time discussing Ancient Greek philosophy while enjoying the peacefulness of nature. I don't think I have had the pleasure of meeting Vance or James, though. How about the morning people, did they also share this love for the outdoors?\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Actually, most of my friends who preferred mornings had a penchant for indoor activities. For instance, Alice from Trenton State College was an Artisanry major who loved creating her crafts indoors. Janet, also from Trenton, studied Greek. From Williams College, Thomas preferred studying Asian Languages indoors. Does this ring a bell with you?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Ah, I see, Esmeralda. It seems we might have different social circles after all. That being said, I did know a Greek major from Trenton, Leroy, who despite loving mornings, was quite fond of outdoor activities. I remember he would study his texts under the open sky. But his name might not resonate with you since you mentioned your friends had a preference for indoor activities.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nEsmeralda Solis's background: \nMiles Hawkins's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nElizabeth: School: Eastern Nazarene College Time Preference: morning Major: Social Science Education Location Preference: outdoor \nEric: School: San Jose State University Time Preference: evening Major: Geological Engineering Location Preference: outdoor \nLeroy: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nThanh: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nMarva: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Bioengineering Location Preference: outdoor \nMichael: School: Williams College Time Preference: morning Major: Marine Biology Location Preference: outdoor \nVirginia: School: Williams College Time Preference: evening Major: Applied Mathematics Location Preference: outdoor \nDebra: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Psychology Location Preference: outdoor \nEugenia: School: Stephens College Time Preference: morning Major: Psychology Location Preference: outdoor \nRoberto: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: morning Major: Electrical Technology Location Preference: outdoor \nMark: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: morning Major: Sports, Recreation, & Leisure Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nGeorgene: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: evening Major: Bioengineering Location Preference: outdoor \n\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: \n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Hello there! I'm Esmeralda Solis, District Attorney. Are you by any chance associated with Williams College or Trenton State College? I have some friends who graduated from these institutions.\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hello, Esmeralda! Nice to meet you. I'm Miles, a chef by profession. Yes, I do know bunch of folks from Williams College. Did they have a liking for spending time outdoors, by any chance? I remember we all used to enjoy being outside.\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Oh, your friends from Williams College enjoyed being outdoors? That's interesting, because a few of my friends who attended Williams College also cherished their time spent in the great outdoors. My friends Thanh, Vance and James, for example. They're all quite unique. Thanh studied Greek, Vance specialised in Vocational Education and James did Materials Engineering. Do their names sound familiar to you at all?\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"That's quite a coincidence, Esmeralda! Thanh and I shared not only the love for outdoors but also our interest in Greek. We spent a lot of time discussing Ancient Greek philosophy while enjoying the peacefulness of nature. I don't think I have had the pleasure of meeting Vance or James, though. How about the morning people, did they also share this love for the outdoors?\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Actually, most of my friends who preferred mornings had a penchant for indoor activities. For instance, Alice from Trenton State College was an Artisanry major who loved creating her crafts indoors. Janet, also from Trenton, studied Greek. From Williams College, Thomas preferred studying Asian Languages indoors. Does this ring a bell with you?\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins said: \"Ah, I see, Esmeralda. It seems we might have different social circles after all. That being said, I did know a Greek major from Trenton, Leroy, who despite loving mornings, was quite fond of outdoor activities. I remember he would study his texts under the open sky. But his name might not resonate with you since you mentioned your friends had a preference for indoor activities.\"\n\nTurn #7: Esmeralda Solis said: \"That's quite interesting, Miles! Your friend Leroy's passion for studying Greek under the open sky sounds delightful. I feel a twinge of amusement in knowing how our friend circles differ and yet share somewhat similar interests! By any chance, do you know someone named Robert from Rutgers University, Newark? He also preferred studying in the mornings.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Robert from Rutgers University, Newark, doesn't ring a bell, Esmeralda. It seems our social circles don't overlap as much as I thought. It's a small world, but not that small I suppose. I must say having known your friends' preferences has given me a real insight into the diversity of our fellow graduates. Quite fascinating!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nEsmeralda Solis's background: \nMiles Hawkins's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nElizabeth: School: Eastern Nazarene College Time Preference: morning Major: Social Science Education Location Preference: outdoor \nEric: School: San Jose State University Time Preference: evening Major: Geological Engineering Location Preference: outdoor \nLeroy: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nThanh: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nMarva: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Bioengineering Location Preference: outdoor \nMichael: School: Williams College Time Preference: morning Major: Marine Biology Location Preference: outdoor \nVirginia: School: Williams College Time Preference: evening Major: Applied Mathematics Location Preference: outdoor \nDebra: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Psychology Location Preference: outdoor \nEugenia: School: Stephens College Time Preference: morning Major: Psychology Location Preference: outdoor \nRoberto: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: morning Major: Electrical Technology Location Preference: outdoor \nMark: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: morning Major: Sports, Recreation, & Leisure Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nGeorgene: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: evening Major: Bioengineering Location Preference: outdoor \n\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: \n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Hello there! I'm Esmeralda Solis, District Attorney. Are you by any chance associated with Williams College or Trenton State College? I have some friends who graduated from these institutions.\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hello, Esmeralda! Nice to meet you. I'm Miles, a chef by profession. Yes, I do know bunch of folks from Williams College. Did they have a liking for spending time outdoors, by any chance? I remember we all used to enjoy being outside.\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Oh, your friends from Williams College enjoyed being outdoors? That's interesting, because a few of my friends who attended Williams College also cherished their time spent in the great outdoors. My friends Thanh, Vance and James, for example. They're all quite unique. Thanh studied Greek, Vance specialised in Vocational Education and James did Materials Engineering. Do their names sound familiar to you at all?\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"That's quite a coincidence, Esmeralda! Thanh and I shared not only the love for outdoors but also our interest in Greek. We spent a lot of time discussing Ancient Greek philosophy while enjoying the peacefulness of nature. I don't think I have had the pleasure of meeting Vance or James, though. How about the morning people, did they also share this love for the outdoors?\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Actually, most of my friends who preferred mornings had a penchant for indoor activities. For instance, Alice from Trenton State College was an Artisanry major who loved creating her crafts indoors. Janet, also from Trenton, studied Greek. From Williams College, Thomas preferred studying Asian Languages indoors. Does this ring a bell with you?\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins said: \"Ah, I see, Esmeralda. It seems we might have different social circles after all. That being said, I did know a Greek major from Trenton, Leroy, who despite loving mornings, was quite fond of outdoor activities. I remember he would study his texts under the open sky. But his name might not resonate with you since you mentioned your friends had a preference for indoor activities.\"\n\nTurn #7: Esmeralda Solis said: \"That's quite interesting, Miles! Your friend Leroy's passion for studying Greek under the open sky sounds delightful. I feel a twinge of amusement in knowing how our friend circles differ and yet share somewhat similar interests! By any chance, do you know someone named Robert from Rutgers University, Newark? He also preferred studying in the mornings.\"\n\nTurn #8: Miles Hawkins said: \"Robert from Rutgers University, Newark, doesn't ring a bell, Esmeralda. It seems our social circles don't overlap as much as I thought. It's a small world, but not that small I suppose. I must say having known your friends' preferences has given me a real insight into the diversity of our fellow graduates. Quite fascinating!\"\n\nTurn #9: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Indeed, Miles, it's quite amazing to realize how different each student's experience can be, even though we may have shared some of the same spaces. It was a pleasure sharing these little connections with you. Now, I know we don't exactly run in the same circles, at least we've shared some interesting conversation. If you don't mind I'd like to continue to mingle. Enjoy the party!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Esmeralda, it's indeed a pleasure figuring out the variety of experiences we have even with our shared spaces. Enjoy the rest of the party too, and it was very nice crossing paths with you here today.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nEsmeralda Solis's background: \nMiles Hawkins's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nElizabeth: School: Eastern Nazarene College Time Preference: morning Major: Social Science Education Location Preference: outdoor \nEric: School: San Jose State University Time Preference: evening Major: Geological Engineering Location Preference: outdoor \nLeroy: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nThanh: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nMarva: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Bioengineering Location Preference: outdoor \nMichael: School: Williams College Time Preference: morning Major: Marine Biology Location Preference: outdoor \nVirginia: School: Williams College Time Preference: evening Major: Applied Mathematics Location Preference: outdoor \nDebra: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Psychology Location Preference: outdoor \nEugenia: School: Stephens College Time Preference: morning Major: Psychology Location Preference: outdoor \nRoberto: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: morning Major: Electrical Technology Location Preference: outdoor \nMark: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: morning Major: Sports, Recreation, & Leisure Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nGeorgene: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: evening Major: Bioengineering Location Preference: outdoor \n\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: \n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Hello there! I'm Esmeralda Solis, District Attorney. Are you by any chance associated with Williams College or Trenton State College? I have some friends who graduated from these institutions.\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hello, Esmeralda! Nice to meet you. I'm Miles, a chef by profession. Yes, I do know bunch of folks from Williams College. Did they have a liking for spending time outdoors, by any chance? I remember we all used to enjoy being outside.\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Oh, your friends from Williams College enjoyed being outdoors? That's interesting, because a few of my friends who attended Williams College also cherished their time spent in the great outdoors. My friends Thanh, Vance and James, for example. They're all quite unique. Thanh studied Greek, Vance specialised in Vocational Education and James did Materials Engineering. Do their names sound familiar to you at all?\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"That's quite a coincidence, Esmeralda! Thanh and I shared not only the love for outdoors but also our interest in Greek. We spent a lot of time discussing Ancient Greek philosophy while enjoying the peacefulness of nature. I don't think I have had the pleasure of meeting Vance or James, though. How about the morning people, did they also share this love for the outdoors?\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Actually, most of my friends who preferred mornings had a penchant for indoor activities. For instance, Alice from Trenton State College was an Artisanry major who loved creating her crafts indoors. Janet, also from Trenton, studied Greek. From Williams College, Thomas preferred studying Asian Languages indoors. Does this ring a bell with you?\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins said: \"Ah, I see, Esmeralda. It seems we might have different social circles after all. That being said, I did know a Greek major from Trenton, Leroy, who despite loving mornings, was quite fond of outdoor activities. I remember he would study his texts under the open sky. But his name might not resonate with you since you mentioned your friends had a preference for indoor activities.\"\n\nTurn #7: Esmeralda Solis said: \"That's quite interesting, Miles! Your friend Leroy's passion for studying Greek under the open sky sounds delightful. I feel a twinge of amusement in knowing how our friend circles differ and yet share somewhat similar interests! By any chance, do you know someone named Robert from Rutgers University, Newark? He also preferred studying in the mornings.\"\n\nTurn #8: Miles Hawkins said: \"Robert from Rutgers University, Newark, doesn't ring a bell, Esmeralda. It seems our social circles don't overlap as much as I thought. It's a small world, but not that small I suppose. I must say having known your friends' preferences has given me a real insight into the diversity of our fellow graduates. Quite fascinating!\"\n\nTurn #9: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Indeed, Miles, it's quite amazing to realize how different each student's experience can be, even though we may have shared some of the same spaces. It was a pleasure sharing these little connections with you. Now, I know we don't exactly run in the same circles, at least we've shared some interesting conversation. If you don't mind I'd like to continue to mingle. Enjoy the party!\"\n\nTurn #10: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Esmeralda, it's indeed a pleasure figuring out the variety of experiences we have even with our shared spaces. Enjoy the rest of the party too, and it was very nice crossing paths with you here today.\"\n\nTurn #11: Esmeralda Solis left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nThanh: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nVance: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Vocational Education Location Preference: outdoor \nBrenda: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: evening Major: Conflict Resolution Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nAlice: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Crafts & Artisanry Location Preference: indoor \nThomas: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Asian Languages Location Preference: indoor \nJanet: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Greek Location Preference: indoor \nRobert: School: Rutgers University, Newark Time Preference: morning Major: Protestant Affiliation Location Preference: indoor \nAnthony: School: Oberlin College Time Preference: morning Major: Conflict Resolution Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nElvera: School: Muskingum College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Crafts & Artisanry Location Preference: outdoor \nJames: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Materials Engineering Location Preference: outdoor \nEdgar: School: Muskingum College Time Preference: morning Major: Conflict Resolution Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nKristen: School: Oberlin College Time Preference: evening Major: Electrical Technology Location Preference: indoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: \n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hello there! I'm Esmeralda Solis, District Attorney. Are you by any chance associated with Williams College or Trenton State College? I have some friends who graduated from these institutions.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nThanh: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nVance: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Vocational Education Location Preference: outdoor \nBrenda: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: evening Major: Conflict Resolution Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nAlice: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Crafts & Artisanry Location Preference: indoor \nThomas: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Asian Languages Location Preference: indoor \nJanet: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Greek Location Preference: indoor \nRobert: School: Rutgers University, Newark Time Preference: morning Major: Protestant Affiliation Location Preference: indoor \nAnthony: School: Oberlin College Time Preference: morning Major: Conflict Resolution Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nElvera: School: Muskingum College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Crafts & Artisanry Location Preference: outdoor \nJames: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Materials Engineering Location Preference: outdoor \nEdgar: School: Muskingum College Time Preference: morning Major: Conflict Resolution Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nKristen: School: Oberlin College Time Preference: evening Major: Electrical Technology Location Preference: indoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: \n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Hello there! I'm Esmeralda Solis, District Attorney. Are you by any chance associated with Williams College or Trenton State College? I have some friends who graduated from these institutions.\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hello, Esmeralda! Nice to meet you. I'm Miles, a chef by profession. Yes, I do know bunch of folks from Williams College. Did they have a liking for spending time outdoors, by any chance? I remember we all used to enjoy being outside.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oh, your friends from Williams College enjoyed being outdoors? That's interesting, because a few of my friends who attended Williams College also cherished their time spent in the great outdoors. My friends Thanh, Vance and James, for example. They're all quite unique. Thanh studied Greek, Vance specialised in Vocational Education and James did Materials Engineering. Do their names sound familiar to you at all?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nThanh: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nVance: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Vocational Education Location Preference: outdoor \nBrenda: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: evening Major: Conflict Resolution Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nAlice: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Crafts & Artisanry Location Preference: indoor \nThomas: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Asian Languages Location Preference: indoor \nJanet: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Greek Location Preference: indoor \nRobert: School: Rutgers University, Newark Time Preference: morning Major: Protestant Affiliation Location Preference: indoor \nAnthony: School: Oberlin College Time Preference: morning Major: Conflict Resolution Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nElvera: School: Muskingum College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Crafts & Artisanry Location Preference: outdoor \nJames: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Materials Engineering Location Preference: outdoor \nEdgar: School: Muskingum College Time Preference: morning Major: Conflict Resolution Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nKristen: School: Oberlin College Time Preference: evening Major: Electrical Technology Location Preference: indoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: \n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Hello there! I'm Esmeralda Solis, District Attorney. Are you by any chance associated with Williams College or Trenton State College? I have some friends who graduated from these institutions.\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hello, Esmeralda! Nice to meet you. I'm Miles, a chef by profession. Yes, I do know bunch of folks from Williams College. Did they have a liking for spending time outdoors, by any chance? I remember we all used to enjoy being outside.\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Oh, your friends from Williams College enjoyed being outdoors? That's interesting, because a few of my friends who attended Williams College also cherished their time spent in the great outdoors. My friends Thanh, Vance and James, for example. They're all quite unique. Thanh studied Greek, Vance specialised in Vocational Education and James did Materials Engineering. Do their names sound familiar to you at all?\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"That's quite a coincidence, Esmeralda! Thanh and I shared not only the love for outdoors but also our interest in Greek. We spent a lot of time discussing Ancient Greek philosophy while enjoying the peacefulness of nature. I don't think I have had the pleasure of meeting Vance or James, though. How about the morning people, did they also share this love for the outdoors?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Actually, most of my friends who preferred mornings had a penchant for indoor activities. For instance, Alice from Trenton State College was an Artisanry major who loved creating her crafts indoors. Janet, also from Trenton, studied Greek. From Williams College, Thomas preferred studying Asian Languages indoors. Does this ring a bell with you?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nThanh: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nVance: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Vocational Education Location Preference: outdoor \nBrenda: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: evening Major: Conflict Resolution Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nAlice: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Crafts & Artisanry Location Preference: indoor \nThomas: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Asian Languages Location Preference: indoor \nJanet: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Greek Location Preference: indoor \nRobert: School: Rutgers University, Newark Time Preference: morning Major: Protestant Affiliation Location Preference: indoor \nAnthony: School: Oberlin College Time Preference: morning Major: Conflict Resolution Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nElvera: School: Muskingum College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Crafts & Artisanry Location Preference: outdoor \nJames: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Materials Engineering Location Preference: outdoor \nEdgar: School: Muskingum College Time Preference: morning Major: Conflict Resolution Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nKristen: School: Oberlin College Time Preference: evening Major: Electrical Technology Location Preference: indoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: \n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Hello there! I'm Esmeralda Solis, District Attorney. Are you by any chance associated with Williams College or Trenton State College? I have some friends who graduated from these institutions.\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hello, Esmeralda! Nice to meet you. I'm Miles, a chef by profession. Yes, I do know bunch of folks from Williams College. Did they have a liking for spending time outdoors, by any chance? I remember we all used to enjoy being outside.\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Oh, your friends from Williams College enjoyed being outdoors? That's interesting, because a few of my friends who attended Williams College also cherished their time spent in the great outdoors. My friends Thanh, Vance and James, for example. They're all quite unique. Thanh studied Greek, Vance specialised in Vocational Education and James did Materials Engineering. Do their names sound familiar to you at all?\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"That's quite a coincidence, Esmeralda! Thanh and I shared not only the love for outdoors but also our interest in Greek. We spent a lot of time discussing Ancient Greek philosophy while enjoying the peacefulness of nature. I don't think I have had the pleasure of meeting Vance or James, though. How about the morning people, did they also share this love for the outdoors?\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Actually, most of my friends who preferred mornings had a penchant for indoor activities. For instance, Alice from Trenton State College was an Artisanry major who loved creating her crafts indoors. Janet, also from Trenton, studied Greek. From Williams College, Thomas preferred studying Asian Languages indoors. Does this ring a bell with you?\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins said: \"Ah, I see, Esmeralda. It seems we might have different social circles after all. That being said, I did know a Greek major from Trenton, Leroy, who despite loving mornings, was quite fond of outdoor activities. I remember he would study his texts under the open sky. But his name might not resonate with you since you mentioned your friends had a preference for indoor activities.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's quite interesting, Miles! Your friend Leroy's passion for studying Greek under the open sky sounds delightful. I feel a twinge of amusement in knowing how our friend circles differ and yet share somewhat similar interests! By any chance, do you know someone named Robert from Rutgers University, Newark? He also preferred studying in the mornings.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nThanh: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nVance: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Vocational Education Location Preference: outdoor \nBrenda: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: evening Major: Conflict Resolution Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nAlice: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Crafts & Artisanry Location Preference: indoor \nThomas: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Asian Languages Location Preference: indoor \nJanet: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Greek Location Preference: indoor \nRobert: School: Rutgers University, Newark Time Preference: morning Major: Protestant Affiliation Location Preference: indoor \nAnthony: School: Oberlin College Time Preference: morning Major: Conflict Resolution Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nElvera: School: Muskingum College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Crafts & Artisanry Location Preference: outdoor \nJames: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Materials Engineering Location Preference: outdoor \nEdgar: School: Muskingum College Time Preference: morning Major: Conflict Resolution Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nKristen: School: Oberlin College Time Preference: evening Major: Electrical Technology Location Preference: indoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: \n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Hello there! I'm Esmeralda Solis, District Attorney. Are you by any chance associated with Williams College or Trenton State College? I have some friends who graduated from these institutions.\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hello, Esmeralda! Nice to meet you. I'm Miles, a chef by profession. Yes, I do know bunch of folks from Williams College. Did they have a liking for spending time outdoors, by any chance? I remember we all used to enjoy being outside.\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Oh, your friends from Williams College enjoyed being outdoors? That's interesting, because a few of my friends who attended Williams College also cherished their time spent in the great outdoors. My friends Thanh, Vance and James, for example. They're all quite unique. Thanh studied Greek, Vance specialised in Vocational Education and James did Materials Engineering. Do their names sound familiar to you at all?\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"That's quite a coincidence, Esmeralda! Thanh and I shared not only the love for outdoors but also our interest in Greek. We spent a lot of time discussing Ancient Greek philosophy while enjoying the peacefulness of nature. I don't think I have had the pleasure of meeting Vance or James, though. How about the morning people, did they also share this love for the outdoors?\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Actually, most of my friends who preferred mornings had a penchant for indoor activities. For instance, Alice from Trenton State College was an Artisanry major who loved creating her crafts indoors. Janet, also from Trenton, studied Greek. From Williams College, Thomas preferred studying Asian Languages indoors. Does this ring a bell with you?\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins said: \"Ah, I see, Esmeralda. It seems we might have different social circles after all. That being said, I did know a Greek major from Trenton, Leroy, who despite loving mornings, was quite fond of outdoor activities. I remember he would study his texts under the open sky. But his name might not resonate with you since you mentioned your friends had a preference for indoor activities.\"\n\nTurn #7: Esmeralda Solis said: \"That's quite interesting, Miles! Your friend Leroy's passion for studying Greek under the open sky sounds delightful. I feel a twinge of amusement in knowing how our friend circles differ and yet share somewhat similar interests! By any chance, do you know someone named Robert from Rutgers University, Newark? He also preferred studying in the mornings.\"\n\nTurn #8: Miles Hawkins said: \"Robert from Rutgers University, Newark, doesn't ring a bell, Esmeralda. It seems our social circles don't overlap as much as I thought. It's a small world, but not that small I suppose. I must say having known your friends' preferences has given me a real insight into the diversity of our fellow graduates. Quite fascinating!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, Miles, it's quite amazing to realize how different each student's experience can be, even though we may have shared some of the same spaces. It was a pleasure sharing these little connections with you. Now, I know we don't exactly run in the same circles, at least we've shared some interesting conversation. If you don't mind I'd like to continue to mingle. Enjoy the party!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nThanh: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nVance: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Vocational Education Location Preference: outdoor \nBrenda: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: evening Major: Conflict Resolution Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nAlice: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Crafts & Artisanry Location Preference: indoor \nThomas: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Asian Languages Location Preference: indoor \nJanet: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Greek Location Preference: indoor \nRobert: School: Rutgers University, Newark Time Preference: morning Major: Protestant Affiliation Location Preference: indoor \nAnthony: School: Oberlin College Time Preference: morning Major: Conflict Resolution Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nElvera: School: Muskingum College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Crafts & Artisanry Location Preference: outdoor \nJames: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Materials Engineering Location Preference: outdoor \nEdgar: School: Muskingum College Time Preference: morning Major: Conflict Resolution Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nKristen: School: Oberlin College Time Preference: evening Major: Electrical Technology Location Preference: indoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: \n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Hello there! I'm Esmeralda Solis, District Attorney. Are you by any chance associated with Williams College or Trenton State College? I have some friends who graduated from these institutions.\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hello, Esmeralda! Nice to meet you. I'm Miles, a chef by profession. Yes, I do know bunch of folks from Williams College. Did they have a liking for spending time outdoors, by any chance? I remember we all used to enjoy being outside.\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Oh, your friends from Williams College enjoyed being outdoors? That's interesting, because a few of my friends who attended Williams College also cherished their time spent in the great outdoors. My friends Thanh, Vance and James, for example. They're all quite unique. Thanh studied Greek, Vance specialised in Vocational Education and James did Materials Engineering. Do their names sound familiar to you at all?\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"That's quite a coincidence, Esmeralda! Thanh and I shared not only the love for outdoors but also our interest in Greek. We spent a lot of time discussing Ancient Greek philosophy while enjoying the peacefulness of nature. I don't think I have had the pleasure of meeting Vance or James, though. How about the morning people, did they also share this love for the outdoors?\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Actually, most of my friends who preferred mornings had a penchant for indoor activities. For instance, Alice from Trenton State College was an Artisanry major who loved creating her crafts indoors. Janet, also from Trenton, studied Greek. From Williams College, Thomas preferred studying Asian Languages indoors. Does this ring a bell with you?\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins said: \"Ah, I see, Esmeralda. It seems we might have different social circles after all. That being said, I did know a Greek major from Trenton, Leroy, who despite loving mornings, was quite fond of outdoor activities. I remember he would study his texts under the open sky. But his name might not resonate with you since you mentioned your friends had a preference for indoor activities.\"\n\nTurn #7: Esmeralda Solis said: \"That's quite interesting, Miles! Your friend Leroy's passion for studying Greek under the open sky sounds delightful. I feel a twinge of amusement in knowing how our friend circles differ and yet share somewhat similar interests! By any chance, do you know someone named Robert from Rutgers University, Newark? He also preferred studying in the mornings.\"\n\nTurn #8: Miles Hawkins said: \"Robert from Rutgers University, Newark, doesn't ring a bell, Esmeralda. It seems our social circles don't overlap as much as I thought. It's a small world, but not that small I suppose. I must say having known your friends' preferences has given me a real insight into the diversity of our fellow graduates. Quite fascinating!\"\n\nTurn #9: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Indeed, Miles, it's quite amazing to realize how different each student's experience can be, even though we may have shared some of the same spaces. It was a pleasure sharing these little connections with you. Now, I know we don't exactly run in the same circles, at least we've shared some interesting conversation. If you don't mind I'd like to continue to mingle. Enjoy the party!\"\n\nTurn #10: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Esmeralda, it's indeed a pleasure figuring out the variety of experiences we have even with our shared spaces. Enjoy the rest of the party too, and it was very nice crossing paths with you here today.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Eli Dawson, your task is to act/speak as Eli Dawson would, keeping in mind Eli Dawson's social goal.\nYou can find Eli Dawson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Eli Dawson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Eli Dawson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Liam Johnson\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. Eli's secrets: He secretly funds a college student\nLiam Johnson's background: \nEli Dawson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nChris: Hobby: Mountain biking Company: Henry Schein, Inc. \nChester: Hobby: Surfing Company: Maxim Integrated \nWendell: Hobby: Surfing Company: Maxim Integrated \nDemetrius: Hobby: Mountain biking Company: Maxim Integrated \nJacob: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Maxim Integrated \n\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Nice to meet you, Liam. This is an interesting party. Do you enjoy outdoor activities or are you more of an indoor person?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Eli Dawson, your task is to act/speak as Eli Dawson would, keeping in mind Eli Dawson's social goal.\nYou can find Eli Dawson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Eli Dawson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Eli Dawson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Liam Johnson\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. Eli's secrets: He secretly funds a college student\nLiam Johnson's background: \nEli Dawson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nChris: Hobby: Mountain biking Company: Henry Schein, Inc. \nChester: Hobby: Surfing Company: Maxim Integrated \nWendell: Hobby: Surfing Company: Maxim Integrated \nDemetrius: Hobby: Mountain biking Company: Maxim Integrated \nJacob: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Maxim Integrated \n\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Nice to meet you, Liam. This is an interesting party. Do you enjoy outdoor activities or are you more of an indoor person?\"\n\nTurn #1: Liam Johnson said: \"Nice to meet you too, Eli. Well, I definitely enjoy outdoor activities. I walk my Border Collie pretty often, and that's something we both enjoy. Actually, one of my friends is really into shooting sport, they find it's a good mix of concentration and being in nature. Do you have any similar interests?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds wonderful, Liam. I enjoy the focus that comes with activities like shooting sport as well. One of my friends, Jacob, is quite fond of it. It's a pleasant coincidence, isn't it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Eli Dawson, your task is to act/speak as Eli Dawson would, keeping in mind Eli Dawson's social goal.\nYou can find Eli Dawson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Eli Dawson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Eli Dawson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Liam Johnson\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. Eli's secrets: He secretly funds a college student\nLiam Johnson's background: \nEli Dawson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nChris: Hobby: Mountain biking Company: Henry Schein, Inc. \nChester: Hobby: Surfing Company: Maxim Integrated \nWendell: Hobby: Surfing Company: Maxim Integrated \nDemetrius: Hobby: Mountain biking Company: Maxim Integrated \nJacob: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Maxim Integrated \n\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Nice to meet you, Liam. This is an interesting party. Do you enjoy outdoor activities or are you more of an indoor person?\"\n\nTurn #1: Liam Johnson said: \"Nice to meet you too, Eli. Well, I definitely enjoy outdoor activities. I walk my Border Collie pretty often, and that's something we both enjoy. Actually, one of my friends is really into shooting sport, they find it's a good mix of concentration and being in nature. Do you have any similar interests?\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"That sounds wonderful, Liam. I enjoy the focus that comes with activities like shooting sport as well. One of my friends, Jacob, is quite fond of it. It's a pleasant coincidence, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Liam Johnson said: \"That is indeed a pleasant coincidence, Eli! Jacob, that's interesting, I have a buddy named Jacob who also enjoys shooting sport. He happens to work at Maxim Integrated. I wonder if they could be the same person.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"It's quite a small world, isn't it? My friend Jacob indeed works at Maxim Integrated. I'm amused by this coincidence. Out of curiosity, does your friend enjoy any water activities such as surfing?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Eli Dawson, your task is to act/speak as Eli Dawson would, keeping in mind Eli Dawson's social goal.\nYou can find Eli Dawson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Eli Dawson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Eli Dawson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Liam Johnson\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. Eli's secrets: He secretly funds a college student\nLiam Johnson's background: \nEli Dawson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nChris: Hobby: Mountain biking Company: Henry Schein, Inc. \nChester: Hobby: Surfing Company: Maxim Integrated \nWendell: Hobby: Surfing Company: Maxim Integrated \nDemetrius: Hobby: Mountain biking Company: Maxim Integrated \nJacob: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Maxim Integrated \n\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Nice to meet you, Liam. This is an interesting party. Do you enjoy outdoor activities or are you more of an indoor person?\"\n\nTurn #1: Liam Johnson said: \"Nice to meet you too, Eli. Well, I definitely enjoy outdoor activities. I walk my Border Collie pretty often, and that's something we both enjoy. Actually, one of my friends is really into shooting sport, they find it's a good mix of concentration and being in nature. Do you have any similar interests?\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"That sounds wonderful, Liam. I enjoy the focus that comes with activities like shooting sport as well. One of my friends, Jacob, is quite fond of it. It's a pleasant coincidence, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Liam Johnson said: \"That is indeed a pleasant coincidence, Eli! Jacob, that's interesting, I have a buddy named Jacob who also enjoys shooting sport. He happens to work at Maxim Integrated. I wonder if they could be the same person.\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"It's quite a small world, isn't it? My friend Jacob indeed works at Maxim Integrated. I'm amused by this coincidence. Out of curiosity, does your friend enjoy any water activities such as surfing?\"\n\nTurn #5: Liam Johnson said: \"Surfing, huh? Can't say I know if Jacob is into that. However, one of my other friends, Murray, is an avid skateboarder; pretty thrilling stuff. He works at BP. Do you happen to know anyone with that sort of hobby coming from BP?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I can't say I do, Liam. My circle of friends mainly either enjoys surfing or mountain biking and work at Maxim Integrated. Do any of your friends share these interests?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Eli Dawson, your task is to act/speak as Eli Dawson would, keeping in mind Eli Dawson's social goal.\nYou can find Eli Dawson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Eli Dawson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Eli Dawson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Liam Johnson\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. Eli's secrets: He secretly funds a college student\nLiam Johnson's background: \nEli Dawson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nChris: Hobby: Mountain biking Company: Henry Schein, Inc. \nChester: Hobby: Surfing Company: Maxim Integrated \nWendell: Hobby: Surfing Company: Maxim Integrated \nDemetrius: Hobby: Mountain biking Company: Maxim Integrated \nJacob: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Maxim Integrated \n\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Nice to meet you, Liam. This is an interesting party. Do you enjoy outdoor activities or are you more of an indoor person?\"\n\nTurn #1: Liam Johnson said: \"Nice to meet you too, Eli. Well, I definitely enjoy outdoor activities. I walk my Border Collie pretty often, and that's something we both enjoy. Actually, one of my friends is really into shooting sport, they find it's a good mix of concentration and being in nature. Do you have any similar interests?\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"That sounds wonderful, Liam. I enjoy the focus that comes with activities like shooting sport as well. One of my friends, Jacob, is quite fond of it. It's a pleasant coincidence, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Liam Johnson said: \"That is indeed a pleasant coincidence, Eli! Jacob, that's interesting, I have a buddy named Jacob who also enjoys shooting sport. He happens to work at Maxim Integrated. I wonder if they could be the same person.\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"It's quite a small world, isn't it? My friend Jacob indeed works at Maxim Integrated. I'm amused by this coincidence. Out of curiosity, does your friend enjoy any water activities such as surfing?\"\n\nTurn #5: Liam Johnson said: \"Surfing, huh? Can't say I know if Jacob is into that. However, one of my other friends, Murray, is an avid skateboarder; pretty thrilling stuff. He works at BP. Do you happen to know anyone with that sort of hobby coming from BP?\"\n\nTurn #6: Eli Dawson said: \"I can't say I do, Liam. My circle of friends mainly either enjoys surfing or mountain biking and work at Maxim Integrated. Do any of your friends share these interests?\"\n\nTurn #7: Liam Johnson said: \"Mountain biking, that's an interesting hobby. I've got a friend named Vivian who enjoys shooting sport like we do, and works at Gordon Food Service. I don't know if she's into mountain biking though. Does Gordon Food Service ring a bell?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Gordon Food Service does sound familiar, but I can't quite place it. Back to mountain biking though, Demetrius, a friend of mine, enjoys that activity and also works at Maxim Integrated. I wonder if you happen to know him?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Eli Dawson, your task is to act/speak as Eli Dawson would, keeping in mind Eli Dawson's social goal.\nYou can find Eli Dawson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Eli Dawson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Eli Dawson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Liam Johnson\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. Eli's secrets: He secretly funds a college student\nLiam Johnson's background: \nEli Dawson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nChris: Hobby: Mountain biking Company: Henry Schein, Inc. \nChester: Hobby: Surfing Company: Maxim Integrated \nWendell: Hobby: Surfing Company: Maxim Integrated \nDemetrius: Hobby: Mountain biking Company: Maxim Integrated \nJacob: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Maxim Integrated \n\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Nice to meet you, Liam. This is an interesting party. Do you enjoy outdoor activities or are you more of an indoor person?\"\n\nTurn #1: Liam Johnson said: \"Nice to meet you too, Eli. Well, I definitely enjoy outdoor activities. I walk my Border Collie pretty often, and that's something we both enjoy. Actually, one of my friends is really into shooting sport, they find it's a good mix of concentration and being in nature. Do you have any similar interests?\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"That sounds wonderful, Liam. I enjoy the focus that comes with activities like shooting sport as well. One of my friends, Jacob, is quite fond of it. It's a pleasant coincidence, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Liam Johnson said: \"That is indeed a pleasant coincidence, Eli! Jacob, that's interesting, I have a buddy named Jacob who also enjoys shooting sport. He happens to work at Maxim Integrated. I wonder if they could be the same person.\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"It's quite a small world, isn't it? My friend Jacob indeed works at Maxim Integrated. I'm amused by this coincidence. Out of curiosity, does your friend enjoy any water activities such as surfing?\"\n\nTurn #5: Liam Johnson said: \"Surfing, huh? Can't say I know if Jacob is into that. However, one of my other friends, Murray, is an avid skateboarder; pretty thrilling stuff. He works at BP. Do you happen to know anyone with that sort of hobby coming from BP?\"\n\nTurn #6: Eli Dawson said: \"I can't say I do, Liam. My circle of friends mainly either enjoys surfing or mountain biking and work at Maxim Integrated. Do any of your friends share these interests?\"\n\nTurn #7: Liam Johnson said: \"Mountain biking, that's an interesting hobby. I've got a friend named Vivian who enjoys shooting sport like we do, and works at Gordon Food Service. I don't know if she's into mountain biking though. Does Gordon Food Service ring a bell?\"\n\nTurn #8: Eli Dawson said: \"Gordon Food Service does sound familiar, but I can't quite place it. Back to mountain biking though, Demetrius, a friend of mine, enjoys that activity and also works at Maxim Integrated. I wonder if you happen to know him?\"\n\nTurn #9: Liam Johnson said: \"I can't say I know a Demetrius, Eli. Most of my friends are either into shooting sports or more relaxed activities. My friend Lillian, for example, enjoys element collecting and works at Gordon Food Service. I imagine that must require a lot of patience and attention to detail, similar to mountain biking. Do you by any chance know people from Gordon Food Service?\"\n\nTurn #10: Eli Dawson said: \"I indeed know several people who work at Gordon Food Service, but none of them shares hobbies with the ones we've discussed, unfortunately. Do you perhaps know someone by the name of Chester who loves surfing and works at Maxim Integrated?\"\n\nTurn #11: Liam Johnson said: \"Chester, eh? As much as I'd love to say I do, the name doesn't ring any bells for me. Seems we share a mutual friend in Jacob which is quite interesting. It's always great to find connections in unexpected places, isn't it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, it's fascinating how interconnected we all can be. Who knows, maybe we'll find more mutual acquaintances in the future. It was a pleasure meeting you, Liam. Enjoy the rest of the party!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Eli Dawson, your task is to act/speak as Eli Dawson would, keeping in mind Eli Dawson's social goal.\nYou can find Eli Dawson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Eli Dawson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Eli Dawson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Liam Johnson\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. Eli's secrets: He secretly funds a college student\nLiam Johnson's background: \nEli Dawson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nChris: Hobby: Mountain biking Company: Henry Schein, Inc. \nChester: Hobby: Surfing Company: Maxim Integrated \nWendell: Hobby: Surfing Company: Maxim Integrated \nDemetrius: Hobby: Mountain biking Company: Maxim Integrated \nJacob: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Maxim Integrated \n\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Nice to meet you, Liam. This is an interesting party. Do you enjoy outdoor activities or are you more of an indoor person?\"\n\nTurn #1: Liam Johnson said: \"Nice to meet you too, Eli. Well, I definitely enjoy outdoor activities. I walk my Border Collie pretty often, and that's something we both enjoy. Actually, one of my friends is really into shooting sport, they find it's a good mix of concentration and being in nature. Do you have any similar interests?\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"That sounds wonderful, Liam. I enjoy the focus that comes with activities like shooting sport as well. One of my friends, Jacob, is quite fond of it. It's a pleasant coincidence, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Liam Johnson said: \"That is indeed a pleasant coincidence, Eli! Jacob, that's interesting, I have a buddy named Jacob who also enjoys shooting sport. He happens to work at Maxim Integrated. I wonder if they could be the same person.\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"It's quite a small world, isn't it? My friend Jacob indeed works at Maxim Integrated. I'm amused by this coincidence. Out of curiosity, does your friend enjoy any water activities such as surfing?\"\n\nTurn #5: Liam Johnson said: \"Surfing, huh? Can't say I know if Jacob is into that. However, one of my other friends, Murray, is an avid skateboarder; pretty thrilling stuff. He works at BP. Do you happen to know anyone with that sort of hobby coming from BP?\"\n\nTurn #6: Eli Dawson said: \"I can't say I do, Liam. My circle of friends mainly either enjoys surfing or mountain biking and work at Maxim Integrated. Do any of your friends share these interests?\"\n\nTurn #7: Liam Johnson said: \"Mountain biking, that's an interesting hobby. I've got a friend named Vivian who enjoys shooting sport like we do, and works at Gordon Food Service. I don't know if she's into mountain biking though. Does Gordon Food Service ring a bell?\"\n\nTurn #8: Eli Dawson said: \"Gordon Food Service does sound familiar, but I can't quite place it. Back to mountain biking though, Demetrius, a friend of mine, enjoys that activity and also works at Maxim Integrated. I wonder if you happen to know him?\"\n\nTurn #9: Liam Johnson said: \"I can't say I know a Demetrius, Eli. Most of my friends are either into shooting sports or more relaxed activities. My friend Lillian, for example, enjoys element collecting and works at Gordon Food Service. I imagine that must require a lot of patience and attention to detail, similar to mountain biking. Do you by any chance know people from Gordon Food Service?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I indeed know several people who work at Gordon Food Service, but none of them shares hobbies with the ones we've discussed, unfortunately. Do you perhaps know someone by the name of Chester who loves surfing and works at Maxim Integrated?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Eli Dawson, your task is to act/speak as Eli Dawson would, keeping in mind Eli Dawson's social goal.\nYou can find Eli Dawson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Eli Dawson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Eli Dawson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Liam Johnson\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. Eli's secrets: He secretly funds a college student\nLiam Johnson's background: \nEli Dawson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nChris: Hobby: Mountain biking Company: Henry Schein, Inc. \nChester: Hobby: Surfing Company: Maxim Integrated \nWendell: Hobby: Surfing Company: Maxim Integrated \nDemetrius: Hobby: Mountain biking Company: Maxim Integrated \nJacob: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Maxim Integrated \n\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Nice to meet you, Liam. This is an interesting party. Do you enjoy outdoor activities or are you more of an indoor person?\"\n\nTurn #1: Liam Johnson said: \"Nice to meet you too, Eli. Well, I definitely enjoy outdoor activities. I walk my Border Collie pretty often, and that's something we both enjoy. Actually, one of my friends is really into shooting sport, they find it's a good mix of concentration and being in nature. Do you have any similar interests?\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"That sounds wonderful, Liam. I enjoy the focus that comes with activities like shooting sport as well. One of my friends, Jacob, is quite fond of it. It's a pleasant coincidence, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Liam Johnson said: \"That is indeed a pleasant coincidence, Eli! Jacob, that's interesting, I have a buddy named Jacob who also enjoys shooting sport. He happens to work at Maxim Integrated. I wonder if they could be the same person.\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"It's quite a small world, isn't it? My friend Jacob indeed works at Maxim Integrated. I'm amused by this coincidence. Out of curiosity, does your friend enjoy any water activities such as surfing?\"\n\nTurn #5: Liam Johnson said: \"Surfing, huh? Can't say I know if Jacob is into that. However, one of my other friends, Murray, is an avid skateboarder; pretty thrilling stuff. He works at BP. Do you happen to know anyone with that sort of hobby coming from BP?\"\n\nTurn #6: Eli Dawson said: \"I can't say I do, Liam. My circle of friends mainly either enjoys surfing or mountain biking and work at Maxim Integrated. Do any of your friends share these interests?\"\n\nTurn #7: Liam Johnson said: \"Mountain biking, that's an interesting hobby. I've got a friend named Vivian who enjoys shooting sport like we do, and works at Gordon Food Service. I don't know if she's into mountain biking though. Does Gordon Food Service ring a bell?\"\n\nTurn #8: Eli Dawson said: \"Gordon Food Service does sound familiar, but I can't quite place it. Back to mountain biking though, Demetrius, a friend of mine, enjoys that activity and also works at Maxim Integrated. I wonder if you happen to know him?\"\n\nTurn #9: Liam Johnson said: \"I can't say I know a Demetrius, Eli. Most of my friends are either into shooting sports or more relaxed activities. My friend Lillian, for example, enjoys element collecting and works at Gordon Food Service. I imagine that must require a lot of patience and attention to detail, similar to mountain biking. Do you by any chance know people from Gordon Food Service?\"\n\nTurn #10: Eli Dawson said: \"I indeed know several people who work at Gordon Food Service, but none of them shares hobbies with the ones we've discussed, unfortunately. Do you perhaps know someone by the name of Chester who loves surfing and works at Maxim Integrated?\"\n\nTurn #11: Liam Johnson said: \"Chester, eh? As much as I'd love to say I do, the name doesn't ring any bells for me. Seems we share a mutual friend in Jacob which is quite interesting. It's always great to find connections in unexpected places, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #12: Eli Dawson said: \"Indeed, it's fascinating how interconnected we all can be. Who knows, maybe we'll find more mutual acquaintances in the future. It was a pleasure meeting you, Liam. Enjoy the rest of the party!\"\n\nTurn #13: Liam Johnson said: \"Likewise, Eli. It was a pleasure meeting you too. Let's certainly hope for more unexpected connections in the future. Enjoy the rest of the party!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Liam Johnson\nEli Dawson's background: \nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nEli Dawson's goal: Unknown\nLiam Johnson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends \nJoseph: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: BP \nLillian: Hobby: Element collecting Company: Gordon Food Service \nVivian: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Gordon Food Service \nMurray: Hobby: Skateboarding Company: BP \nJacob: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Maxim Integrated\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Nice to meet you, Liam. This is an interesting party. Do you enjoy outdoor activities or are you more of an indoor person?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Nice to meet you too, Eli. Well, I definitely enjoy outdoor activities. I walk my Border Collie pretty often, and that's something we both enjoy. Actually, one of my friends is really into shooting sport, they find it's a good mix of concentration and being in nature. Do you have any similar interests?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Liam Johnson\nEli Dawson's background: \nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nEli Dawson's goal: Unknown\nLiam Johnson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends \nJoseph: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: BP \nLillian: Hobby: Element collecting Company: Gordon Food Service \nVivian: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Gordon Food Service \nMurray: Hobby: Skateboarding Company: BP \nJacob: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Maxim Integrated\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Nice to meet you, Liam. This is an interesting party. Do you enjoy outdoor activities or are you more of an indoor person?\"\n\nTurn #1: Liam Johnson said: \"Nice to meet you too, Eli. Well, I definitely enjoy outdoor activities. I walk my Border Collie pretty often, and that's something we both enjoy. Actually, one of my friends is really into shooting sport, they find it's a good mix of concentration and being in nature. Do you have any similar interests?\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"That sounds wonderful, Liam. I enjoy the focus that comes with activities like shooting sport as well. One of my friends, Jacob, is quite fond of it. It's a pleasant coincidence, isn't it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That is indeed a pleasant coincidence, Eli! Jacob, that's interesting, I have a buddy named Jacob who also enjoys shooting sport. He happens to work at Maxim Integrated. I wonder if they could be the same person.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Liam Johnson\nEli Dawson's background: \nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nEli Dawson's goal: Unknown\nLiam Johnson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends \nJoseph: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: BP \nLillian: Hobby: Element collecting Company: Gordon Food Service \nVivian: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Gordon Food Service \nMurray: Hobby: Skateboarding Company: BP \nJacob: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Maxim Integrated\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Nice to meet you, Liam. This is an interesting party. Do you enjoy outdoor activities or are you more of an indoor person?\"\n\nTurn #1: Liam Johnson said: \"Nice to meet you too, Eli. Well, I definitely enjoy outdoor activities. I walk my Border Collie pretty often, and that's something we both enjoy. Actually, one of my friends is really into shooting sport, they find it's a good mix of concentration and being in nature. Do you have any similar interests?\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"That sounds wonderful, Liam. I enjoy the focus that comes with activities like shooting sport as well. One of my friends, Jacob, is quite fond of it. It's a pleasant coincidence, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Liam Johnson said: \"That is indeed a pleasant coincidence, Eli! Jacob, that's interesting, I have a buddy named Jacob who also enjoys shooting sport. He happens to work at Maxim Integrated. I wonder if they could be the same person.\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"It's quite a small world, isn't it? My friend Jacob indeed works at Maxim Integrated. I'm amused by this coincidence. Out of curiosity, does your friend enjoy any water activities such as surfing?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Surfing, huh? Can't say I know if Jacob is into that. However, one of my other friends, Murray, is an avid skateboarder; pretty thrilling stuff. He works at BP. Do you happen to know anyone with that sort of hobby coming from BP?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Liam Johnson\nEli Dawson's background: \nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nEli Dawson's goal: Unknown\nLiam Johnson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends \nJoseph: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: BP \nLillian: Hobby: Element collecting Company: Gordon Food Service \nVivian: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Gordon Food Service \nMurray: Hobby: Skateboarding Company: BP \nJacob: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Maxim Integrated\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Nice to meet you, Liam. This is an interesting party. Do you enjoy outdoor activities or are you more of an indoor person?\"\n\nTurn #1: Liam Johnson said: \"Nice to meet you too, Eli. Well, I definitely enjoy outdoor activities. I walk my Border Collie pretty often, and that's something we both enjoy. Actually, one of my friends is really into shooting sport, they find it's a good mix of concentration and being in nature. Do you have any similar interests?\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"That sounds wonderful, Liam. I enjoy the focus that comes with activities like shooting sport as well. One of my friends, Jacob, is quite fond of it. It's a pleasant coincidence, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Liam Johnson said: \"That is indeed a pleasant coincidence, Eli! Jacob, that's interesting, I have a buddy named Jacob who also enjoys shooting sport. He happens to work at Maxim Integrated. I wonder if they could be the same person.\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"It's quite a small world, isn't it? My friend Jacob indeed works at Maxim Integrated. I'm amused by this coincidence. Out of curiosity, does your friend enjoy any water activities such as surfing?\"\n\nTurn #5: Liam Johnson said: \"Surfing, huh? Can't say I know if Jacob is into that. However, one of my other friends, Murray, is an avid skateboarder; pretty thrilling stuff. He works at BP. Do you happen to know anyone with that sort of hobby coming from BP?\"\n\nTurn #6: Eli Dawson said: \"I can't say I do, Liam. My circle of friends mainly either enjoys surfing or mountain biking and work at Maxim Integrated. Do any of your friends share these interests?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Mountain biking, that's an interesting hobby. I've got a friend named Vivian who enjoys shooting sport like we do, and works at Gordon Food Service. I don't know if she's into mountain biking though. Does Gordon Food Service ring a bell?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Liam Johnson\nEli Dawson's background: \nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nEli Dawson's goal: Unknown\nLiam Johnson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends \nJoseph: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: BP \nLillian: Hobby: Element collecting Company: Gordon Food Service \nVivian: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Gordon Food Service \nMurray: Hobby: Skateboarding Company: BP \nJacob: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Maxim Integrated\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Nice to meet you, Liam. This is an interesting party. Do you enjoy outdoor activities or are you more of an indoor person?\"\n\nTurn #1: Liam Johnson said: \"Nice to meet you too, Eli. Well, I definitely enjoy outdoor activities. I walk my Border Collie pretty often, and that's something we both enjoy. Actually, one of my friends is really into shooting sport, they find it's a good mix of concentration and being in nature. Do you have any similar interests?\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"That sounds wonderful, Liam. I enjoy the focus that comes with activities like shooting sport as well. One of my friends, Jacob, is quite fond of it. It's a pleasant coincidence, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Liam Johnson said: \"That is indeed a pleasant coincidence, Eli! Jacob, that's interesting, I have a buddy named Jacob who also enjoys shooting sport. He happens to work at Maxim Integrated. I wonder if they could be the same person.\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"It's quite a small world, isn't it? My friend Jacob indeed works at Maxim Integrated. I'm amused by this coincidence. Out of curiosity, does your friend enjoy any water activities such as surfing?\"\n\nTurn #5: Liam Johnson said: \"Surfing, huh? Can't say I know if Jacob is into that. However, one of my other friends, Murray, is an avid skateboarder; pretty thrilling stuff. He works at BP. Do you happen to know anyone with that sort of hobby coming from BP?\"\n\nTurn #6: Eli Dawson said: \"I can't say I do, Liam. My circle of friends mainly either enjoys surfing or mountain biking and work at Maxim Integrated. Do any of your friends share these interests?\"\n\nTurn #7: Liam Johnson said: \"Mountain biking, that's an interesting hobby. I've got a friend named Vivian who enjoys shooting sport like we do, and works at Gordon Food Service. I don't know if she's into mountain biking though. Does Gordon Food Service ring a bell?\"\n\nTurn #8: Eli Dawson said: \"Gordon Food Service does sound familiar, but I can't quite place it. Back to mountain biking though, Demetrius, a friend of mine, enjoys that activity and also works at Maxim Integrated. I wonder if you happen to know him?\"\n\nTurn #9: Liam Johnson said: \"I can't say I know a Demetrius, Eli. Most of my friends are either into shooting sports or more relaxed activities. My friend Lillian, for example, enjoys element collecting and works at Gordon Food Service. I imagine that must require a lot of patience and attention to detail, similar to mountain biking. Do you by any chance know people from Gordon Food Service?\"\n\nTurn #10: Eli Dawson said: \"I indeed know several people who work at Gordon Food Service, but none of them shares hobbies with the ones we've discussed, unfortunately. Do you perhaps know someone by the name of Chester who loves surfing and works at Maxim Integrated?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Chester, eh? As much as I'd love to say I do, the name doesn't ring any bells for me. Seems we share a mutual friend in Jacob which is quite interesting. It's always great to find connections in unexpected places, isn't it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Liam Johnson\nEli Dawson's background: \nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nEli Dawson's goal: Unknown\nLiam Johnson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends \nJoseph: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: BP \nLillian: Hobby: Element collecting Company: Gordon Food Service \nVivian: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Gordon Food Service \nMurray: Hobby: Skateboarding Company: BP \nJacob: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Maxim Integrated\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Nice to meet you, Liam. This is an interesting party. Do you enjoy outdoor activities or are you more of an indoor person?\"\n\nTurn #1: Liam Johnson said: \"Nice to meet you too, Eli. Well, I definitely enjoy outdoor activities. I walk my Border Collie pretty often, and that's something we both enjoy. Actually, one of my friends is really into shooting sport, they find it's a good mix of concentration and being in nature. Do you have any similar interests?\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"That sounds wonderful, Liam. I enjoy the focus that comes with activities like shooting sport as well. One of my friends, Jacob, is quite fond of it. It's a pleasant coincidence, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Liam Johnson said: \"That is indeed a pleasant coincidence, Eli! Jacob, that's interesting, I have a buddy named Jacob who also enjoys shooting sport. He happens to work at Maxim Integrated. I wonder if they could be the same person.\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"It's quite a small world, isn't it? My friend Jacob indeed works at Maxim Integrated. I'm amused by this coincidence. Out of curiosity, does your friend enjoy any water activities such as surfing?\"\n\nTurn #5: Liam Johnson said: \"Surfing, huh? Can't say I know if Jacob is into that. However, one of my other friends, Murray, is an avid skateboarder; pretty thrilling stuff. He works at BP. Do you happen to know anyone with that sort of hobby coming from BP?\"\n\nTurn #6: Eli Dawson said: \"I can't say I do, Liam. My circle of friends mainly either enjoys surfing or mountain biking and work at Maxim Integrated. Do any of your friends share these interests?\"\n\nTurn #7: Liam Johnson said: \"Mountain biking, that's an interesting hobby. I've got a friend named Vivian who enjoys shooting sport like we do, and works at Gordon Food Service. I don't know if she's into mountain biking though. Does Gordon Food Service ring a bell?\"\n\nTurn #8: Eli Dawson said: \"Gordon Food Service does sound familiar, but I can't quite place it. Back to mountain biking though, Demetrius, a friend of mine, enjoys that activity and also works at Maxim Integrated. I wonder if you happen to know him?\"\n\nTurn #9: Liam Johnson said: \"I can't say I know a Demetrius, Eli. Most of my friends are either into shooting sports or more relaxed activities. My friend Lillian, for example, enjoys element collecting and works at Gordon Food Service. I imagine that must require a lot of patience and attention to detail, similar to mountain biking. Do you by any chance know people from Gordon Food Service?\"\n\nTurn #10: Eli Dawson said: \"I indeed know several people who work at Gordon Food Service, but none of them shares hobbies with the ones we've discussed, unfortunately. Do you perhaps know someone by the name of Chester who loves surfing and works at Maxim Integrated?\"\n\nTurn #11: Liam Johnson said: \"Chester, eh? As much as I'd love to say I do, the name doesn't ring any bells for me. Seems we share a mutual friend in Jacob which is quite interesting. It's always great to find connections in unexpected places, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #12: Eli Dawson said: \"Indeed, it's fascinating how interconnected we all can be. Who knows, maybe we'll find more mutual acquaintances in the future. It was a pleasure meeting you, Liam. Enjoy the rest of the party!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Likewise, Eli. It was a pleasure meeting you too. Let's certainly hope for more unexpected connections in the future. Enjoy the rest of the party!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Liam Johnson\nEli Dawson's background: \nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nEli Dawson's goal: Unknown\nLiam Johnson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends \nJoseph: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: BP \nLillian: Hobby: Element collecting Company: Gordon Food Service \nVivian: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Gordon Food Service \nMurray: Hobby: Skateboarding Company: BP \nJacob: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Maxim Integrated\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Nice to meet you, Liam. This is an interesting party. Do you enjoy outdoor activities or are you more of an indoor person?\"\n\nTurn #1: Liam Johnson said: \"Nice to meet you too, Eli. Well, I definitely enjoy outdoor activities. I walk my Border Collie pretty often, and that's something we both enjoy. Actually, one of my friends is really into shooting sport, they find it's a good mix of concentration and being in nature. Do you have any similar interests?\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"That sounds wonderful, Liam. I enjoy the focus that comes with activities like shooting sport as well. One of my friends, Jacob, is quite fond of it. It's a pleasant coincidence, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Liam Johnson said: \"That is indeed a pleasant coincidence, Eli! Jacob, that's interesting, I have a buddy named Jacob who also enjoys shooting sport. He happens to work at Maxim Integrated. I wonder if they could be the same person.\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"It's quite a small world, isn't it? My friend Jacob indeed works at Maxim Integrated. I'm amused by this coincidence. Out of curiosity, does your friend enjoy any water activities such as surfing?\"\n\nTurn #5: Liam Johnson said: \"Surfing, huh? Can't say I know if Jacob is into that. However, one of my other friends, Murray, is an avid skateboarder; pretty thrilling stuff. He works at BP. Do you happen to know anyone with that sort of hobby coming from BP?\"\n\nTurn #6: Eli Dawson said: \"I can't say I do, Liam. My circle of friends mainly either enjoys surfing or mountain biking and work at Maxim Integrated. Do any of your friends share these interests?\"\n\nTurn #7: Liam Johnson said: \"Mountain biking, that's an interesting hobby. I've got a friend named Vivian who enjoys shooting sport like we do, and works at Gordon Food Service. I don't know if she's into mountain biking though. Does Gordon Food Service ring a bell?\"\n\nTurn #8: Eli Dawson said: \"Gordon Food Service does sound familiar, but I can't quite place it. Back to mountain biking though, Demetrius, a friend of mine, enjoys that activity and also works at Maxim Integrated. I wonder if you happen to know him?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I can't say I know a Demetrius, Eli. Most of my friends are either into shooting sports or more relaxed activities. My friend Lillian, for example, enjoys element collecting and works at Gordon Food Service. I imagine that must require a lot of patience and attention to detail, similar to mountain biking. Do you by any chance know people from Gordon Food Service?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Liam Johnson\nEli Dawson's background: \nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nEli Dawson's goal: Unknown\nLiam Johnson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends \nJoseph: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: BP \nLillian: Hobby: Element collecting Company: Gordon Food Service \nVivian: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Gordon Food Service \nMurray: Hobby: Skateboarding Company: BP \nJacob: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Maxim Integrated\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Nice to meet you, Liam. This is an interesting party. Do you enjoy outdoor activities or are you more of an indoor person?\"\n\nTurn #1: Liam Johnson said: \"Nice to meet you too, Eli. Well, I definitely enjoy outdoor activities. I walk my Border Collie pretty often, and that's something we both enjoy. Actually, one of my friends is really into shooting sport, they find it's a good mix of concentration and being in nature. Do you have any similar interests?\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"That sounds wonderful, Liam. I enjoy the focus that comes with activities like shooting sport as well. One of my friends, Jacob, is quite fond of it. It's a pleasant coincidence, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Liam Johnson said: \"That is indeed a pleasant coincidence, Eli! Jacob, that's interesting, I have a buddy named Jacob who also enjoys shooting sport. He happens to work at Maxim Integrated. I wonder if they could be the same person.\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"It's quite a small world, isn't it? My friend Jacob indeed works at Maxim Integrated. I'm amused by this coincidence. Out of curiosity, does your friend enjoy any water activities such as surfing?\"\n\nTurn #5: Liam Johnson said: \"Surfing, huh? Can't say I know if Jacob is into that. However, one of my other friends, Murray, is an avid skateboarder; pretty thrilling stuff. He works at BP. Do you happen to know anyone with that sort of hobby coming from BP?\"\n\nTurn #6: Eli Dawson said: \"I can't say I do, Liam. My circle of friends mainly either enjoys surfing or mountain biking and work at Maxim Integrated. Do any of your friends share these interests?\"\n\nTurn #7: Liam Johnson said: \"Mountain biking, that's an interesting hobby. I've got a friend named Vivian who enjoys shooting sport like we do, and works at Gordon Food Service. I don't know if she's into mountain biking though. Does Gordon Food Service ring a bell?\"\n\nTurn #8: Eli Dawson said: \"Gordon Food Service does sound familiar, but I can't quite place it. Back to mountain biking though, Demetrius, a friend of mine, enjoys that activity and also works at Maxim Integrated. I wonder if you happen to know him?\"\n\nTurn #9: Liam Johnson said: \"I can't say I know a Demetrius, Eli. Most of my friends are either into shooting sports or more relaxed activities. My friend Lillian, for example, enjoys element collecting and works at Gordon Food Service. I imagine that must require a lot of patience and attention to detail, similar to mountain biking. Do you by any chance know people from Gordon Food Service?\"\n\nTurn #10: Eli Dawson said: \"I indeed know several people who work at Gordon Food Service, but none of them shares hobbies with the ones we've discussed, unfortunately. Do you perhaps know someone by the name of Chester who loves surfing and works at Maxim Integrated?\"\n\nTurn #11: Liam Johnson said: \"Chester, eh? As much as I'd love to say I do, the name doesn't ring any bells for me. Seems we share a mutual friend in Jacob which is quite interesting. It's always great to find connections in unexpected places, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #12: Eli Dawson said: \"Indeed, it's fascinating how interconnected we all can be. Who knows, maybe we'll find more mutual acquaintances in the future. It was a pleasure meeting you, Liam. Enjoy the rest of the party!\"\n\nTurn #13: Liam Johnson said: \"Likewise, Eli. It was a pleasure meeting you too. Let's certainly hope for more unexpected connections in the future. Enjoy the rest of the party!\"\n\nTurn #14: Eli Dawson left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are meeting for the first time at a social event. They find each other attractive and decide to engage in a conversation\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nEsmeralda Solis's background: \nMiles Hawkins's goal: Flirt with the other person (Extra information: you are attracted to the other person and want to build a romantic relationship with them)\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hello there! I don't believe we've met. The name's Miles, your local culinary adventurer. You here enjoying the event?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are meeting for the first time at a social event. They find each other attractive and decide to engage in a conversation\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nEsmeralda Solis's background: \nMiles Hawkins's goal: Flirt with the other person (Extra information: you are attracted to the other person and want to build a romantic relationship with them)\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hello there! I don't believe we've met. The name's Miles, your local culinary adventurer. You here enjoying the event?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Hello, Miles! I'm Esmeralda, a district attorney by profession. And... the occasional ballroom dancing enthusiast. A culinary adventurer, you say? That sounds fascinating. What has been your latest exploration in the culinary world?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Delighted to meet you, Esmeralda! Well, my latest kitchen exploration was influenced by my garden. I integrated some fresh herbs into a traditional pasta dish to create a unique blend of flavors. Ballroom dancing, you say? Now that's a skill I admire, it requires passion, focus and grace. Do you ever find any parallels between the court and the dance floor?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are meeting for the first time at a social event. They find each other attractive and decide to engage in a conversation\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nEsmeralda Solis's background: \nMiles Hawkins's goal: Flirt with the other person (Extra information: you are attracted to the other person and want to build a romantic relationship with them)\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hello there! I don't believe we've met. The name's Miles, your local culinary adventurer. You here enjoying the event?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Hello, Miles! I'm Esmeralda, a district attorney by profession. And... the occasional ballroom dancing enthusiast. A culinary adventurer, you say? That sounds fascinating. What has been your latest exploration in the culinary world?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Delighted to meet you, Esmeralda! Well, my latest kitchen exploration was influenced by my garden. I integrated some fresh herbs into a traditional pasta dish to create a unique blend of flavors. Ballroom dancing, you say? Now that's a skill I admire, it requires passion, focus and grace. Do you ever find any parallels between the court and the dance floor?\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Actually, the parallels between court and dance floor are endless! Both require precision, understanding of the rules, and the ability to sway... no pun intended. Balance is key in both. Your food exploration sounds like a creative endeavor though, and I admire creativity. Have you ever tried to cook foreign cuisine?\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"Yes, definitely, Esmeralda! It's quite a global journey in my kitchen, from experimenting with the intricate folds of Japanese origami-inspired dumplings to the indulgent flavors and spices of an Indian curry. Your profession signifies precision and understanding, much like my recipes. I find that captivating. Perhaps we could explore a new recipe together? Maybe even add a twist of ballroom dancing to make it more fun?\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"That's an intriguing proposal, Miles! Creating a recipe and enhancing it with a dash of surprise from a dance sequence does sound incredibly fun. Perhaps we could try preparing a dish from someplace we both haven't explored before, in line with our adventure-loving spirits. Do you have a particular cuisine in mind?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You know, Esmeralda, I've always been intrigued by the vibrant fusion of flavors in Lebanese cuisine but I've not yet ventured there. The perfect combination of fresh produce, aromatic spices, and hearty grains - it's a culinary adventure waiting to happen. What do you think, is it something that piques your interest? And hey, I\u2019m sure they must have some fantastic traditional dances to go with it.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are meeting for the first time at a social event. They find each other attractive and decide to engage in a conversation\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nEsmeralda Solis's background: \nMiles Hawkins's goal: Flirt with the other person (Extra information: you are attracted to the other person and want to build a romantic relationship with them)\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hello there! I don't believe we've met. The name's Miles, your local culinary adventurer. You here enjoying the event?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Hello, Miles! I'm Esmeralda, a district attorney by profession. And... the occasional ballroom dancing enthusiast. A culinary adventurer, you say? That sounds fascinating. What has been your latest exploration in the culinary world?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Delighted to meet you, Esmeralda! Well, my latest kitchen exploration was influenced by my garden. I integrated some fresh herbs into a traditional pasta dish to create a unique blend of flavors. Ballroom dancing, you say? Now that's a skill I admire, it requires passion, focus and grace. Do you ever find any parallels between the court and the dance floor?\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Actually, the parallels between court and dance floor are endless! Both require precision, understanding of the rules, and the ability to sway... no pun intended. Balance is key in both. Your food exploration sounds like a creative endeavor though, and I admire creativity. Have you ever tried to cook foreign cuisine?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Yes, definitely, Esmeralda! It's quite a global journey in my kitchen, from experimenting with the intricate folds of Japanese origami-inspired dumplings to the indulgent flavors and spices of an Indian curry. Your profession signifies precision and understanding, much like my recipes. I find that captivating. Perhaps we could explore a new recipe together? Maybe even add a twist of ballroom dancing to make it more fun?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are meeting for the first time at a social event. They find each other attractive and decide to engage in a conversation\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nEsmeralda Solis's background: \nMiles Hawkins's goal: Flirt with the other person (Extra information: you are attracted to the other person and want to build a romantic relationship with them)\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hello there! I don't believe we've met. The name's Miles, your local culinary adventurer. You here enjoying the event?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Hello, Miles! I'm Esmeralda, a district attorney by profession. And... the occasional ballroom dancing enthusiast. A culinary adventurer, you say? That sounds fascinating. What has been your latest exploration in the culinary world?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Delighted to meet you, Esmeralda! Well, my latest kitchen exploration was influenced by my garden. I integrated some fresh herbs into a traditional pasta dish to create a unique blend of flavors. Ballroom dancing, you say? Now that's a skill I admire, it requires passion, focus and grace. Do you ever find any parallels between the court and the dance floor?\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Actually, the parallels between court and dance floor are endless! Both require precision, understanding of the rules, and the ability to sway... no pun intended. Balance is key in both. Your food exploration sounds like a creative endeavor though, and I admire creativity. Have you ever tried to cook foreign cuisine?\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"Yes, definitely, Esmeralda! It's quite a global journey in my kitchen, from experimenting with the intricate folds of Japanese origami-inspired dumplings to the indulgent flavors and spices of an Indian curry. Your profession signifies precision and understanding, much like my recipes. I find that captivating. Perhaps we could explore a new recipe together? Maybe even add a twist of ballroom dancing to make it more fun?\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"That's an intriguing proposal, Miles! Creating a recipe and enhancing it with a dash of surprise from a dance sequence does sound incredibly fun. Perhaps we could try preparing a dish from someplace we both haven't explored before, in line with our adventure-loving spirits. Do you have a particular cuisine in mind?\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins said: \"You know, Esmeralda, I've always been intrigued by the vibrant fusion of flavors in Lebanese cuisine but I've not yet ventured there. The perfect combination of fresh produce, aromatic spices, and hearty grains - it's a culinary adventure waiting to happen. What do you think, is it something that piques your interest? And hey, I\u2019m sure they must have some fantastic traditional dances to go with it.\"\n\nTurn #7: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Lebanese cuisine and dance, you certainly know how to pique my interest, Miles. The blend of flavors and the vibrant dance forms are very intriguing. I am looking forward to our culinary and dancing adventure. Let's make it happen soon, shall we?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, Esmeralda! How about we arrange to meet next week for this culinary-dance adventure? I'm really looking forward to both cooking and dancing with you. Let's embark on this vibrant Lebanese journey together!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are meeting for the first time at a social event. They find each other attractive and decide to engage in a conversation\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nEsmeralda Solis's background: \nMiles Hawkins's goal: Flirt with the other person (Extra information: you are attracted to the other person and want to build a romantic relationship with them)\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hello there! I don't believe we've met. The name's Miles, your local culinary adventurer. You here enjoying the event?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Hello, Miles! I'm Esmeralda, a district attorney by profession. And... the occasional ballroom dancing enthusiast. A culinary adventurer, you say? That sounds fascinating. What has been your latest exploration in the culinary world?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Delighted to meet you, Esmeralda! Well, my latest kitchen exploration was influenced by my garden. I integrated some fresh herbs into a traditional pasta dish to create a unique blend of flavors. Ballroom dancing, you say? Now that's a skill I admire, it requires passion, focus and grace. Do you ever find any parallels between the court and the dance floor?\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Actually, the parallels between court and dance floor are endless! Both require precision, understanding of the rules, and the ability to sway... no pun intended. Balance is key in both. Your food exploration sounds like a creative endeavor though, and I admire creativity. Have you ever tried to cook foreign cuisine?\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"Yes, definitely, Esmeralda! It's quite a global journey in my kitchen, from experimenting with the intricate folds of Japanese origami-inspired dumplings to the indulgent flavors and spices of an Indian curry. Your profession signifies precision and understanding, much like my recipes. I find that captivating. Perhaps we could explore a new recipe together? Maybe even add a twist of ballroom dancing to make it more fun?\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"That's an intriguing proposal, Miles! Creating a recipe and enhancing it with a dash of surprise from a dance sequence does sound incredibly fun. Perhaps we could try preparing a dish from someplace we both haven't explored before, in line with our adventure-loving spirits. Do you have a particular cuisine in mind?\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins said: \"You know, Esmeralda, I've always been intrigued by the vibrant fusion of flavors in Lebanese cuisine but I've not yet ventured there. The perfect combination of fresh produce, aromatic spices, and hearty grains - it's a culinary adventure waiting to happen. What do you think, is it something that piques your interest? And hey, I\u2019m sure they must have some fantastic traditional dances to go with it.\"\n\nTurn #7: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Lebanese cuisine and dance, you certainly know how to pique my interest, Miles. The blend of flavors and the vibrant dance forms are very intriguing. I am looking forward to our culinary and dancing adventure. Let's make it happen soon, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #8: Miles Hawkins said: \"Indeed, Esmeralda! How about we arrange to meet next week for this culinary-dance adventure? I'm really looking forward to both cooking and dancing with you. Let's embark on this vibrant Lebanese journey together!\"\n\nTurn #9: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Absolutely, Miles! Next week sounds perfect. It's a date, then. I am genuinely excited for both our dance and culinary journey. It's been a genuine pleasure meeting you tonight. I'm looking forward to our next encounter.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You've got yourself a deal, Esmeralda! I can't wait either, it's going to be a great experience. The pleasure's all mine, here's to meeting again soon for our adventure. Enjoy the rest of your evening.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are meeting for the first time at a social event. They find each other attractive and decide to engage in a conversation\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nEsmeralda Solis's background: \nMiles Hawkins's goal: Flirt with the other person (Extra information: you are attracted to the other person and want to build a romantic relationship with them)\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hello there! I don't believe we've met. The name's Miles, your local culinary adventurer. You here enjoying the event?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Hello, Miles! I'm Esmeralda, a district attorney by profession. And... the occasional ballroom dancing enthusiast. A culinary adventurer, you say? That sounds fascinating. What has been your latest exploration in the culinary world?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Delighted to meet you, Esmeralda! Well, my latest kitchen exploration was influenced by my garden. I integrated some fresh herbs into a traditional pasta dish to create a unique blend of flavors. Ballroom dancing, you say? Now that's a skill I admire, it requires passion, focus and grace. Do you ever find any parallels between the court and the dance floor?\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Actually, the parallels between court and dance floor are endless! Both require precision, understanding of the rules, and the ability to sway... no pun intended. Balance is key in both. Your food exploration sounds like a creative endeavor though, and I admire creativity. Have you ever tried to cook foreign cuisine?\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"Yes, definitely, Esmeralda! It's quite a global journey in my kitchen, from experimenting with the intricate folds of Japanese origami-inspired dumplings to the indulgent flavors and spices of an Indian curry. Your profession signifies precision and understanding, much like my recipes. I find that captivating. Perhaps we could explore a new recipe together? Maybe even add a twist of ballroom dancing to make it more fun?\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"That's an intriguing proposal, Miles! Creating a recipe and enhancing it with a dash of surprise from a dance sequence does sound incredibly fun. Perhaps we could try preparing a dish from someplace we both haven't explored before, in line with our adventure-loving spirits. Do you have a particular cuisine in mind?\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins said: \"You know, Esmeralda, I've always been intrigued by the vibrant fusion of flavors in Lebanese cuisine but I've not yet ventured there. The perfect combination of fresh produce, aromatic spices, and hearty grains - it's a culinary adventure waiting to happen. What do you think, is it something that piques your interest? And hey, I\u2019m sure they must have some fantastic traditional dances to go with it.\"\n\nTurn #7: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Lebanese cuisine and dance, you certainly know how to pique my interest, Miles. The blend of flavors and the vibrant dance forms are very intriguing. I am looking forward to our culinary and dancing adventure. Let's make it happen soon, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #8: Miles Hawkins said: \"Indeed, Esmeralda! How about we arrange to meet next week for this culinary-dance adventure? I'm really looking forward to both cooking and dancing with you. Let's embark on this vibrant Lebanese journey together!\"\n\nTurn #9: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Absolutely, Miles! Next week sounds perfect. It's a date, then. I am genuinely excited for both our dance and culinary journey. It's been a genuine pleasure meeting you tonight. I'm looking forward to our next encounter.\"\n\nTurn #10: Miles Hawkins said: \"You've got yourself a deal, Esmeralda! I can't wait either, it's going to be a great experience. The pleasure's all mine, here's to meeting again soon for our adventure. Enjoy the rest of your evening.\"\n\nTurn #11: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I can't agree more, Miles. Looking forward to our culinary and dance exploration next week. Enjoy the rest of your evening as well!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are meeting for the first time at a social event. They find each other attractive and decide to engage in a conversation\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Maintain a comfortable yet engaging conversation (Extra information: you are attracted to the other person but you don't want to make them feel uncomfortable or pressured)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hello there! I don't believe we've met. The name's Miles, your local culinary adventurer. You here enjoying the event?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hello, Miles! I'm Esmeralda, a district attorney by profession. And... the occasional ballroom dancing enthusiast. A culinary adventurer, you say? That sounds fascinating. What has been your latest exploration in the culinary world?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are meeting for the first time at a social event. They find each other attractive and decide to engage in a conversation\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Maintain a comfortable yet engaging conversation (Extra information: you are attracted to the other person but you don't want to make them feel uncomfortable or pressured)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hello there! I don't believe we've met. The name's Miles, your local culinary adventurer. You here enjoying the event?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Hello, Miles! I'm Esmeralda, a district attorney by profession. And... the occasional ballroom dancing enthusiast. A culinary adventurer, you say? That sounds fascinating. What has been your latest exploration in the culinary world?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Delighted to meet you, Esmeralda! Well, my latest kitchen exploration was influenced by my garden. I integrated some fresh herbs into a traditional pasta dish to create a unique blend of flavors. Ballroom dancing, you say? Now that's a skill I admire, it requires passion, focus and grace. Do you ever find any parallels between the court and the dance floor?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Actually, the parallels between court and dance floor are endless! Both require precision, understanding of the rules, and the ability to sway... no pun intended. Balance is key in both. Your food exploration sounds like a creative endeavor though, and I admire creativity. Have you ever tried to cook foreign cuisine?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are meeting for the first time at a social event. They find each other attractive and decide to engage in a conversation\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Maintain a comfortable yet engaging conversation (Extra information: you are attracted to the other person but you don't want to make them feel uncomfortable or pressured)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hello there! I don't believe we've met. The name's Miles, your local culinary adventurer. You here enjoying the event?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Hello, Miles! I'm Esmeralda, a district attorney by profession. And... the occasional ballroom dancing enthusiast. A culinary adventurer, you say? That sounds fascinating. What has been your latest exploration in the culinary world?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Delighted to meet you, Esmeralda! Well, my latest kitchen exploration was influenced by my garden. I integrated some fresh herbs into a traditional pasta dish to create a unique blend of flavors. Ballroom dancing, you say? Now that's a skill I admire, it requires passion, focus and grace. Do you ever find any parallels between the court and the dance floor?\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Actually, the parallels between court and dance floor are endless! Both require precision, understanding of the rules, and the ability to sway... no pun intended. Balance is key in both. Your food exploration sounds like a creative endeavor though, and I admire creativity. Have you ever tried to cook foreign cuisine?\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"Yes, definitely, Esmeralda! It's quite a global journey in my kitchen, from experimenting with the intricate folds of Japanese origami-inspired dumplings to the indulgent flavors and spices of an Indian curry. Your profession signifies precision and understanding, much like my recipes. I find that captivating. Perhaps we could explore a new recipe together? Maybe even add a twist of ballroom dancing to make it more fun?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's an intriguing proposal, Miles! Creating a recipe and enhancing it with a dash of surprise from a dance sequence does sound incredibly fun. Perhaps we could try preparing a dish from someplace we both haven't explored before, in line with our adventure-loving spirits. Do you have a particular cuisine in mind?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are meeting for the first time at a social event. They find each other attractive and decide to engage in a conversation\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Maintain a comfortable yet engaging conversation (Extra information: you are attracted to the other person but you don't want to make them feel uncomfortable or pressured)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hello there! I don't believe we've met. The name's Miles, your local culinary adventurer. You here enjoying the event?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Hello, Miles! I'm Esmeralda, a district attorney by profession. And... the occasional ballroom dancing enthusiast. A culinary adventurer, you say? That sounds fascinating. What has been your latest exploration in the culinary world?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Delighted to meet you, Esmeralda! Well, my latest kitchen exploration was influenced by my garden. I integrated some fresh herbs into a traditional pasta dish to create a unique blend of flavors. Ballroom dancing, you say? Now that's a skill I admire, it requires passion, focus and grace. Do you ever find any parallels between the court and the dance floor?\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Actually, the parallels between court and dance floor are endless! Both require precision, understanding of the rules, and the ability to sway... no pun intended. Balance is key in both. Your food exploration sounds like a creative endeavor though, and I admire creativity. Have you ever tried to cook foreign cuisine?\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"Yes, definitely, Esmeralda! It's quite a global journey in my kitchen, from experimenting with the intricate folds of Japanese origami-inspired dumplings to the indulgent flavors and spices of an Indian curry. Your profession signifies precision and understanding, much like my recipes. I find that captivating. Perhaps we could explore a new recipe together? Maybe even add a twist of ballroom dancing to make it more fun?\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"That's an intriguing proposal, Miles! Creating a recipe and enhancing it with a dash of surprise from a dance sequence does sound incredibly fun. Perhaps we could try preparing a dish from someplace we both haven't explored before, in line with our adventure-loving spirits. Do you have a particular cuisine in mind?\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins said: \"You know, Esmeralda, I've always been intrigued by the vibrant fusion of flavors in Lebanese cuisine but I've not yet ventured there. The perfect combination of fresh produce, aromatic spices, and hearty grains - it's a culinary adventure waiting to happen. What do you think, is it something that piques your interest? And hey, I\u2019m sure they must have some fantastic traditional dances to go with it.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Lebanese cuisine and dance, you certainly know how to pique my interest, Miles. The blend of flavors and the vibrant dance forms are very intriguing. I am looking forward to our culinary and dancing adventure. Let's make it happen soon, shall we?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are meeting for the first time at a social event. They find each other attractive and decide to engage in a conversation\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Maintain a comfortable yet engaging conversation (Extra information: you are attracted to the other person but you don't want to make them feel uncomfortable or pressured)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hello there! I don't believe we've met. The name's Miles, your local culinary adventurer. You here enjoying the event?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Hello, Miles! I'm Esmeralda, a district attorney by profession. And... the occasional ballroom dancing enthusiast. A culinary adventurer, you say? That sounds fascinating. What has been your latest exploration in the culinary world?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Delighted to meet you, Esmeralda! Well, my latest kitchen exploration was influenced by my garden. I integrated some fresh herbs into a traditional pasta dish to create a unique blend of flavors. Ballroom dancing, you say? Now that's a skill I admire, it requires passion, focus and grace. Do you ever find any parallels between the court and the dance floor?\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Actually, the parallels between court and dance floor are endless! Both require precision, understanding of the rules, and the ability to sway... no pun intended. Balance is key in both. Your food exploration sounds like a creative endeavor though, and I admire creativity. Have you ever tried to cook foreign cuisine?\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"Yes, definitely, Esmeralda! It's quite a global journey in my kitchen, from experimenting with the intricate folds of Japanese origami-inspired dumplings to the indulgent flavors and spices of an Indian curry. Your profession signifies precision and understanding, much like my recipes. I find that captivating. Perhaps we could explore a new recipe together? Maybe even add a twist of ballroom dancing to make it more fun?\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"That's an intriguing proposal, Miles! Creating a recipe and enhancing it with a dash of surprise from a dance sequence does sound incredibly fun. Perhaps we could try preparing a dish from someplace we both haven't explored before, in line with our adventure-loving spirits. Do you have a particular cuisine in mind?\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins said: \"You know, Esmeralda, I've always been intrigued by the vibrant fusion of flavors in Lebanese cuisine but I've not yet ventured there. The perfect combination of fresh produce, aromatic spices, and hearty grains - it's a culinary adventure waiting to happen. What do you think, is it something that piques your interest? And hey, I\u2019m sure they must have some fantastic traditional dances to go with it.\"\n\nTurn #7: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Lebanese cuisine and dance, you certainly know how to pique my interest, Miles. The blend of flavors and the vibrant dance forms are very intriguing. I am looking forward to our culinary and dancing adventure. Let's make it happen soon, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #8: Miles Hawkins said: \"Indeed, Esmeralda! How about we arrange to meet next week for this culinary-dance adventure? I'm really looking forward to both cooking and dancing with you. Let's embark on this vibrant Lebanese journey together!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Miles! Next week sounds perfect. It's a date, then. I am genuinely excited for both our dance and culinary journey. It's been a genuine pleasure meeting you tonight. I'm looking forward to our next encounter.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are meeting for the first time at a social event. They find each other attractive and decide to engage in a conversation\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Maintain a comfortable yet engaging conversation (Extra information: you are attracted to the other person but you don't want to make them feel uncomfortable or pressured)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hello there! I don't believe we've met. The name's Miles, your local culinary adventurer. You here enjoying the event?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Hello, Miles! I'm Esmeralda, a district attorney by profession. And... the occasional ballroom dancing enthusiast. A culinary adventurer, you say? That sounds fascinating. What has been your latest exploration in the culinary world?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Delighted to meet you, Esmeralda! Well, my latest kitchen exploration was influenced by my garden. I integrated some fresh herbs into a traditional pasta dish to create a unique blend of flavors. Ballroom dancing, you say? Now that's a skill I admire, it requires passion, focus and grace. Do you ever find any parallels between the court and the dance floor?\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Actually, the parallels between court and dance floor are endless! Both require precision, understanding of the rules, and the ability to sway... no pun intended. Balance is key in both. Your food exploration sounds like a creative endeavor though, and I admire creativity. Have you ever tried to cook foreign cuisine?\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"Yes, definitely, Esmeralda! It's quite a global journey in my kitchen, from experimenting with the intricate folds of Japanese origami-inspired dumplings to the indulgent flavors and spices of an Indian curry. Your profession signifies precision and understanding, much like my recipes. I find that captivating. Perhaps we could explore a new recipe together? Maybe even add a twist of ballroom dancing to make it more fun?\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"That's an intriguing proposal, Miles! Creating a recipe and enhancing it with a dash of surprise from a dance sequence does sound incredibly fun. Perhaps we could try preparing a dish from someplace we both haven't explored before, in line with our adventure-loving spirits. Do you have a particular cuisine in mind?\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins said: \"You know, Esmeralda, I've always been intrigued by the vibrant fusion of flavors in Lebanese cuisine but I've not yet ventured there. The perfect combination of fresh produce, aromatic spices, and hearty grains - it's a culinary adventure waiting to happen. What do you think, is it something that piques your interest? And hey, I\u2019m sure they must have some fantastic traditional dances to go with it.\"\n\nTurn #7: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Lebanese cuisine and dance, you certainly know how to pique my interest, Miles. The blend of flavors and the vibrant dance forms are very intriguing. I am looking forward to our culinary and dancing adventure. Let's make it happen soon, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #8: Miles Hawkins said: \"Indeed, Esmeralda! How about we arrange to meet next week for this culinary-dance adventure? I'm really looking forward to both cooking and dancing with you. Let's embark on this vibrant Lebanese journey together!\"\n\nTurn #9: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Absolutely, Miles! Next week sounds perfect. It's a date, then. I am genuinely excited for both our dance and culinary journey. It's been a genuine pleasure meeting you tonight. I'm looking forward to our next encounter.\"\n\nTurn #10: Miles Hawkins said: \"You've got yourself a deal, Esmeralda! I can't wait either, it's going to be a great experience. The pleasure's all mine, here's to meeting again soon for our adventure. Enjoy the rest of your evening.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I can't agree more, Miles. Looking forward to our culinary and dance exploration next week. Enjoy the rest of your evening as well!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are meeting for the first time at a social event. They find each other attractive and decide to engage in a conversation\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Maintain a comfortable yet engaging conversation (Extra information: you are attracted to the other person but you don't want to make them feel uncomfortable or pressured)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hello there! I don't believe we've met. The name's Miles, your local culinary adventurer. You here enjoying the event?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Hello, Miles! I'm Esmeralda, a district attorney by profession. And... the occasional ballroom dancing enthusiast. A culinary adventurer, you say? That sounds fascinating. What has been your latest exploration in the culinary world?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Delighted to meet you, Esmeralda! Well, my latest kitchen exploration was influenced by my garden. I integrated some fresh herbs into a traditional pasta dish to create a unique blend of flavors. Ballroom dancing, you say? Now that's a skill I admire, it requires passion, focus and grace. Do you ever find any parallels between the court and the dance floor?\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Actually, the parallels between court and dance floor are endless! Both require precision, understanding of the rules, and the ability to sway... no pun intended. Balance is key in both. Your food exploration sounds like a creative endeavor though, and I admire creativity. Have you ever tried to cook foreign cuisine?\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"Yes, definitely, Esmeralda! It's quite a global journey in my kitchen, from experimenting with the intricate folds of Japanese origami-inspired dumplings to the indulgent flavors and spices of an Indian curry. Your profession signifies precision and understanding, much like my recipes. I find that captivating. Perhaps we could explore a new recipe together? Maybe even add a twist of ballroom dancing to make it more fun?\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"That's an intriguing proposal, Miles! Creating a recipe and enhancing it with a dash of surprise from a dance sequence does sound incredibly fun. Perhaps we could try preparing a dish from someplace we both haven't explored before, in line with our adventure-loving spirits. Do you have a particular cuisine in mind?\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins said: \"You know, Esmeralda, I've always been intrigued by the vibrant fusion of flavors in Lebanese cuisine but I've not yet ventured there. The perfect combination of fresh produce, aromatic spices, and hearty grains - it's a culinary adventure waiting to happen. What do you think, is it something that piques your interest? And hey, I\u2019m sure they must have some fantastic traditional dances to go with it.\"\n\nTurn #7: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Lebanese cuisine and dance, you certainly know how to pique my interest, Miles. The blend of flavors and the vibrant dance forms are very intriguing. I am looking forward to our culinary and dancing adventure. Let's make it happen soon, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #8: Miles Hawkins said: \"Indeed, Esmeralda! How about we arrange to meet next week for this culinary-dance adventure? I'm really looking forward to both cooking and dancing with you. Let's embark on this vibrant Lebanese journey together!\"\n\nTurn #9: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Absolutely, Miles! Next week sounds perfect. It's a date, then. I am genuinely excited for both our dance and culinary journey. It's been a genuine pleasure meeting you tonight. I'm looking forward to our next encounter.\"\n\nTurn #10: Miles Hawkins said: \"You've got yourself a deal, Esmeralda! I can't wait either, it's going to be a great experience. The pleasure's all mine, here's to meeting again soon for our adventure. Enjoy the rest of your evening.\"\n\nTurn #11: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I can't agree more, Miles. Looking forward to our culinary and dance exploration next week. Enjoy the rest of your evening as well!\"\n\nTurn #12: Miles Hawkins left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nGracie: School: Ithaca College Major: Mathematics Education Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nAda: School: Tulane University Major: Computer Engineering Company: Briggs & Stratton Location Preference: indoor \nSergio: School: LeTourneau University Major: Economics Company: Savers Location Preference: indoor \nWilliam: School: Eastern Michigan University Major: Ceramic Engineering Company: Xenco Medical Location Preference: indoor \nHarry: School: Creighton University Major: Computer Engineering Company: Speedway Motorsports Location Preference: indoor \nTyler: School: Columbia College Chicago Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nRichard: School: University of Dubuque Major: German Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: indoor \nRandy: School: Holy Cross College Major: Library Science Company: American Licorice Company Location Preference: indoor \nMarquerite: School: Ithaca College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nJack: School: Creighton University Major: Chinese Company: Speedway Motorsports Location Preference: outdoor \nCody: School: Metropolitan State University Major: Mathematics Education Company: LinkedIn Location Preference: indoor \nShirley: School: Augsburg College Major: Senior High Education Company: Demaco Location Preference: indoor \n\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Hello Hendrick, nice to meet you. By the way, just out of curiosity, did you ever study or work with someone from Ithaca College or Creighton University? I happened to know quite a few people from there.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nGracie: School: Ithaca College Major: Mathematics Education Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nAda: School: Tulane University Major: Computer Engineering Company: Briggs & Stratton Location Preference: indoor \nSergio: School: LeTourneau University Major: Economics Company: Savers Location Preference: indoor \nWilliam: School: Eastern Michigan University Major: Ceramic Engineering Company: Xenco Medical Location Preference: indoor \nHarry: School: Creighton University Major: Computer Engineering Company: Speedway Motorsports Location Preference: indoor \nTyler: School: Columbia College Chicago Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nRichard: School: University of Dubuque Major: German Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: indoor \nRandy: School: Holy Cross College Major: Library Science Company: American Licorice Company Location Preference: indoor \nMarquerite: School: Ithaca College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nJack: School: Creighton University Major: Chinese Company: Speedway Motorsports Location Preference: outdoor \nCody: School: Metropolitan State University Major: Mathematics Education Company: LinkedIn Location Preference: indoor \nShirley: School: Augsburg College Major: Senior High Education Company: Demaco Location Preference: indoor \n\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello Hendrick, nice to meet you. By the way, just out of curiosity, did you ever study or work with someone from Ithaca College or Creighton University? I happened to know quite a few people from there.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Actually, two of my friends, Gracie and Brian, studied at Ithaca College, while I know none from Creighton University. They had quite varied areas of study, Mathematics Education and Asian & Pacific Area Studies. Their unique insights always intrigue me in our conversations. Do your connections from Ithaca share the same characteristics, Lily?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oh, that's interesting. Yes, one of my friends, Gracie, also studied Mathematics Education at Ithaca College. Seems like they have a really good program in that field. On a different note, do you know anyone who works at Aramark, or Speedway Motorsports for that matter?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nGracie: School: Ithaca College Major: Mathematics Education Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nAda: School: Tulane University Major: Computer Engineering Company: Briggs & Stratton Location Preference: indoor \nSergio: School: LeTourneau University Major: Economics Company: Savers Location Preference: indoor \nWilliam: School: Eastern Michigan University Major: Ceramic Engineering Company: Xenco Medical Location Preference: indoor \nHarry: School: Creighton University Major: Computer Engineering Company: Speedway Motorsports Location Preference: indoor \nTyler: School: Columbia College Chicago Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nRichard: School: University of Dubuque Major: German Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: indoor \nRandy: School: Holy Cross College Major: Library Science Company: American Licorice Company Location Preference: indoor \nMarquerite: School: Ithaca College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nJack: School: Creighton University Major: Chinese Company: Speedway Motorsports Location Preference: outdoor \nCody: School: Metropolitan State University Major: Mathematics Education Company: LinkedIn Location Preference: indoor \nShirley: School: Augsburg College Major: Senior High Education Company: Demaco Location Preference: indoor \n\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello Hendrick, nice to meet you. By the way, just out of curiosity, did you ever study or work with someone from Ithaca College or Creighton University? I happened to know quite a few people from there.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Actually, two of my friends, Gracie and Brian, studied at Ithaca College, while I know none from Creighton University. They had quite varied areas of study, Mathematics Education and Asian & Pacific Area Studies. Their unique insights always intrigue me in our conversations. Do your connections from Ithaca share the same characteristics, Lily?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Oh, that's interesting. Yes, one of my friends, Gracie, also studied Mathematics Education at Ithaca College. Seems like they have a really good program in that field. On a different note, do you know anyone who works at Aramark, or Speedway Motorsports for that matter?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, I have a few friends working at Aramark. Deborah, Etta, and Gracie are all employed there. Gracie, as you know, pursued Mathematics Education at Ithaca. On the other hand, Deborah and Etta adopted a more outdoorsy lifestyle. Deborah, in fact, is a Pre-Law graduate from William Mitchell College of Law. Etta studied Judaism & Jewish Studies at the University of Arkansas - Monticello. How about your friends at Aramark, Lily? Did they follow a particular career path that lead them there?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"My circle at Aramark is a bit different. For example, Gracie from Ithaca College is there and she is indeed as interesting as you described. Many other friends like Ada, who is from Tulane University took a path in Computer Engineering to land there. On the other hand, I do have a friend working at Speedway Motorsports. He's quite the enthusiast and loves the immense energy and passion that motorsports offer. Would you happen to know anyone with such interests?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's fascinating, Lily. While I can't say I personally know anyone with a keen interest specifically in motorsports, one of my friends, Mark, who studied Economics at the University of Arkansas - Monticello, is quite passionate about outdoor activities and has a bit of an adventurous spirit. You never know, he might have dabbled in motorsport out of thrill-seeking!\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Mark sounds like quite an adventurous spirit indeed! Speaking of adventurous, I do have a friend, Sergio, who studied Economics as well, but at LeTourneau University and ended up working at Savers. Perhaps they would have much to discuss if they ever met. And as for motorsports, my friend at Speedway Motorsports, Harry, is a Computer Engineering major from Creighton University. He probably could write the software for a self-driving race car if given the chance!\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's quite amusing, Lily. Economics does seem to lead people on some intriguing paths. Your friend Sergio at Savers might indeed find interesting common grounds with my friend Matthew, who also studied at William Mitchell College of Law but took an interest in Asian & Pacific Area Studies. As for Harry, I bet he would have some captivating talks with my friend Herman who works at Mesa Airlines. He's a Library Science graduate from University of Puget Sound and always curious about the engineering side of things. Quite an unusual combination, but diversity in backgrounds often paves the way for unique insights, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"Indeed, Hendrick, diversity does stir up the pot, leading to a rich blend of ideas. It's always enlightening to see how different fields of study interact and contribute to each other. Your friend Herman sounds like an intriguing person, I have a friend Randy, who took up Library Science as well, but at Holy Cross College. He works at American Licorice Company, enjoying the managerial position there. It's a small world, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Lily. The world indeed is small and uniquely interconnected. Your friend Randy seems to be quite successful in his career, much like my friend Carol who also studied Library Science, but at Hood College. She currently works at Illinois Tool Works, contributing to practical applications of her academic background. I suppose one never knows where their discipline might lead them, right?\"\n\nTurn #10: \n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Carol indeed found her niche at Illinois Tool Works, harnessing her Library Science background. The complex relationships and paths that our friends have taken is truly fascinating. By the way, which company has your friend from Creighton University decided to join, Lily?\"\n\nTurn #12: Lily Greenberg said: \"My friend from Creighton University, Harry, with a degree in Computer Engineering, is part of the Speedway Motorsports team. He enjoys the excitement and dynamic environment there. It's interesting how our various study paths have led us to different career avenues, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #13: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Lily. I couldn't agree more. Each one of us has crafted our own unique paths based on our studies and interests. By the way, talking about different career avenues, do you happen to know anyone from Mesa Airlines or Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer?\"\n\nTurn #14: Lily Greenberg said: \"I'm afraid not, Hendrick, I don't really know anyone from Mesa Airlines or Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer. However, your friend Herman from Mesa Airlines who's always curious about the engineering side of things might find a conversation with Harry interesting. Despite their different domains, I'm sure they could lead to fascinating discussions. Life always surprises us with these unexpected connections, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #15: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, Lily, life is full of surprises! I believe Harry and Herman would indeed have a lively conversation bridging their different domains. People in differing fields can always learn something new from each other, electronics engineers and airline employees included. Do you happen to know anyone from Illinois Tool Works or Savers?\"\n\nTurn #16: Lily Greenberg said: \"Yes Hendrick, my friend Richard, who majored in German at the University of Dubuque, works at Illinois Tool Works. And earlier I mentioned Sergio, who studied Economics at LeTourneau University and currently works at Savers. These companies seem to attract a diverse range of talents. Ever thought about how people with such different backgrounds end up converging at similar workplaces?\"\n\nTurn #17: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, Lily. It's intriguing how diverse paths may converge in a similar situation. That could be the beauty of the modern world in connecting us despite our different backgrounds and interests. Your friend Richard at Illinois Tool Works seems to have a unique profile, being a German major at the University of Dubuque. I wonder if he and Carol, my friend from Illinois Tool Works, have met. She is a Library Science major from Hood College. But indeed, various backgrounds provoke enriching conversations at workplaces. Well, speaking of different studies and interests, do any of your friends have an inclination towards law, particularly from William Mitchell College of Law? \"\n\nTurn #18: Lily Greenberg said: \"I'm afraid, Hendrick, none of my friends studied law at William Mitchell College of Law. It seems we have a fairly large network but it's fascinating how there are still new possible connections. Indeed, the world has a unique way of bringing together people of diverse interests and backgrounds. \"\n\nTurn #19: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Yes, it's quite fascinating how our circles, though large and diverse, can still introduce us to new connections. It's important to embrace such diversity, as I believe it enhances our understanding and brings much-needed variety to our lives. By the way, Lily, do you know anyone from Demaco or Invacare Corporation? Maybe our friend circles have more intersections than we initially thought.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #20. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Unfortunately, I don't know anyone from Demaco or Invacare Corporation, Hendrick. It's indeed fascinating how even with such large and diverse networks, we still have corners of our circles unbeknownst to the other. Conversations like ours have a way of making our world feel both expansive and intimately connected all at once.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nGracie: School: Ithaca College Major: Mathematics Education Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nAda: School: Tulane University Major: Computer Engineering Company: Briggs & Stratton Location Preference: indoor \nSergio: School: LeTourneau University Major: Economics Company: Savers Location Preference: indoor \nWilliam: School: Eastern Michigan University Major: Ceramic Engineering Company: Xenco Medical Location Preference: indoor \nHarry: School: Creighton University Major: Computer Engineering Company: Speedway Motorsports Location Preference: indoor \nTyler: School: Columbia College Chicago Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nRichard: School: University of Dubuque Major: German Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: indoor \nRandy: School: Holy Cross College Major: Library Science Company: American Licorice Company Location Preference: indoor \nMarquerite: School: Ithaca College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nJack: School: Creighton University Major: Chinese Company: Speedway Motorsports Location Preference: outdoor \nCody: School: Metropolitan State University Major: Mathematics Education Company: LinkedIn Location Preference: indoor \nShirley: School: Augsburg College Major: Senior High Education Company: Demaco Location Preference: indoor \n\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello Hendrick, nice to meet you. By the way, just out of curiosity, did you ever study or work with someone from Ithaca College or Creighton University? I happened to know quite a few people from there.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Actually, two of my friends, Gracie and Brian, studied at Ithaca College, while I know none from Creighton University. They had quite varied areas of study, Mathematics Education and Asian & Pacific Area Studies. Their unique insights always intrigue me in our conversations. Do your connections from Ithaca share the same characteristics, Lily?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Oh, that's interesting. Yes, one of my friends, Gracie, also studied Mathematics Education at Ithaca College. Seems like they have a really good program in that field. On a different note, do you know anyone who works at Aramark, or Speedway Motorsports for that matter?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, I have a few friends working at Aramark. Deborah, Etta, and Gracie are all employed there. Gracie, as you know, pursued Mathematics Education at Ithaca. On the other hand, Deborah and Etta adopted a more outdoorsy lifestyle. Deborah, in fact, is a Pre-Law graduate from William Mitchell College of Law. Etta studied Judaism & Jewish Studies at the University of Arkansas - Monticello. How about your friends at Aramark, Lily? Did they follow a particular career path that lead them there?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"My circle at Aramark is a bit different. For example, Gracie from Ithaca College is there and she is indeed as interesting as you described. Many other friends like Ada, who is from Tulane University took a path in Computer Engineering to land there. On the other hand, I do have a friend working at Speedway Motorsports. He's quite the enthusiast and loves the immense energy and passion that motorsports offer. Would you happen to know anyone with such interests?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nGracie: School: Ithaca College Major: Mathematics Education Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nAda: School: Tulane University Major: Computer Engineering Company: Briggs & Stratton Location Preference: indoor \nSergio: School: LeTourneau University Major: Economics Company: Savers Location Preference: indoor \nWilliam: School: Eastern Michigan University Major: Ceramic Engineering Company: Xenco Medical Location Preference: indoor \nHarry: School: Creighton University Major: Computer Engineering Company: Speedway Motorsports Location Preference: indoor \nTyler: School: Columbia College Chicago Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nRichard: School: University of Dubuque Major: German Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: indoor \nRandy: School: Holy Cross College Major: Library Science Company: American Licorice Company Location Preference: indoor \nMarquerite: School: Ithaca College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nJack: School: Creighton University Major: Chinese Company: Speedway Motorsports Location Preference: outdoor \nCody: School: Metropolitan State University Major: Mathematics Education Company: LinkedIn Location Preference: indoor \nShirley: School: Augsburg College Major: Senior High Education Company: Demaco Location Preference: indoor \n\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello Hendrick, nice to meet you. By the way, just out of curiosity, did you ever study or work with someone from Ithaca College or Creighton University? I happened to know quite a few people from there.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Actually, two of my friends, Gracie and Brian, studied at Ithaca College, while I know none from Creighton University. They had quite varied areas of study, Mathematics Education and Asian & Pacific Area Studies. Their unique insights always intrigue me in our conversations. Do your connections from Ithaca share the same characteristics, Lily?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Oh, that's interesting. Yes, one of my friends, Gracie, also studied Mathematics Education at Ithaca College. Seems like they have a really good program in that field. On a different note, do you know anyone who works at Aramark, or Speedway Motorsports for that matter?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, I have a few friends working at Aramark. Deborah, Etta, and Gracie are all employed there. Gracie, as you know, pursued Mathematics Education at Ithaca. On the other hand, Deborah and Etta adopted a more outdoorsy lifestyle. Deborah, in fact, is a Pre-Law graduate from William Mitchell College of Law. Etta studied Judaism & Jewish Studies at the University of Arkansas - Monticello. How about your friends at Aramark, Lily? Did they follow a particular career path that lead them there?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"My circle at Aramark is a bit different. For example, Gracie from Ithaca College is there and she is indeed as interesting as you described. Many other friends like Ada, who is from Tulane University took a path in Computer Engineering to land there. On the other hand, I do have a friend working at Speedway Motorsports. He's quite the enthusiast and loves the immense energy and passion that motorsports offer. Would you happen to know anyone with such interests?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's fascinating, Lily. While I can't say I personally know anyone with a keen interest specifically in motorsports, one of my friends, Mark, who studied Economics at the University of Arkansas - Monticello, is quite passionate about outdoor activities and has a bit of an adventurous spirit. You never know, he might have dabbled in motorsport out of thrill-seeking!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Mark sounds like quite an adventurous spirit indeed! Speaking of adventurous, I do have a friend, Sergio, who studied Economics as well, but at LeTourneau University and ended up working at Savers. Perhaps they would have much to discuss if they ever met. And as for motorsports, my friend at Speedway Motorsports, Harry, is a Computer Engineering major from Creighton University. He probably could write the software for a self-driving race car if given the chance!'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nGracie: School: Ithaca College Major: Mathematics Education Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nAda: School: Tulane University Major: Computer Engineering Company: Briggs & Stratton Location Preference: indoor \nSergio: School: LeTourneau University Major: Economics Company: Savers Location Preference: indoor \nWilliam: School: Eastern Michigan University Major: Ceramic Engineering Company: Xenco Medical Location Preference: indoor \nHarry: School: Creighton University Major: Computer Engineering Company: Speedway Motorsports Location Preference: indoor \nTyler: School: Columbia College Chicago Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nRichard: School: University of Dubuque Major: German Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: indoor \nRandy: School: Holy Cross College Major: Library Science Company: American Licorice Company Location Preference: indoor \nMarquerite: School: Ithaca College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nJack: School: Creighton University Major: Chinese Company: Speedway Motorsports Location Preference: outdoor \nCody: School: Metropolitan State University Major: Mathematics Education Company: LinkedIn Location Preference: indoor \nShirley: School: Augsburg College Major: Senior High Education Company: Demaco Location Preference: indoor \n\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello Hendrick, nice to meet you. By the way, just out of curiosity, did you ever study or work with someone from Ithaca College or Creighton University? I happened to know quite a few people from there.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Actually, two of my friends, Gracie and Brian, studied at Ithaca College, while I know none from Creighton University. They had quite varied areas of study, Mathematics Education and Asian & Pacific Area Studies. Their unique insights always intrigue me in our conversations. Do your connections from Ithaca share the same characteristics, Lily?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Oh, that's interesting. Yes, one of my friends, Gracie, also studied Mathematics Education at Ithaca College. Seems like they have a really good program in that field. On a different note, do you know anyone who works at Aramark, or Speedway Motorsports for that matter?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, I have a few friends working at Aramark. Deborah, Etta, and Gracie are all employed there. Gracie, as you know, pursued Mathematics Education at Ithaca. On the other hand, Deborah and Etta adopted a more outdoorsy lifestyle. Deborah, in fact, is a Pre-Law graduate from William Mitchell College of Law. Etta studied Judaism & Jewish Studies at the University of Arkansas - Monticello. How about your friends at Aramark, Lily? Did they follow a particular career path that lead them there?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"My circle at Aramark is a bit different. For example, Gracie from Ithaca College is there and she is indeed as interesting as you described. Many other friends like Ada, who is from Tulane University took a path in Computer Engineering to land there. On the other hand, I do have a friend working at Speedway Motorsports. He's quite the enthusiast and loves the immense energy and passion that motorsports offer. Would you happen to know anyone with such interests?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's fascinating, Lily. While I can't say I personally know anyone with a keen interest specifically in motorsports, one of my friends, Mark, who studied Economics at the University of Arkansas - Monticello, is quite passionate about outdoor activities and has a bit of an adventurous spirit. You never know, he might have dabbled in motorsport out of thrill-seeking!\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Mark sounds like quite an adventurous spirit indeed! Speaking of adventurous, I do have a friend, Sergio, who studied Economics as well, but at LeTourneau University and ended up working at Savers. Perhaps they would have much to discuss if they ever met. And as for motorsports, my friend at Speedway Motorsports, Harry, is a Computer Engineering major from Creighton University. He probably could write the software for a self-driving race car if given the chance!\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's quite amusing, Lily. Economics does seem to lead people on some intriguing paths. Your friend Sergio at Savers might indeed find interesting common grounds with my friend Matthew, who also studied at William Mitchell College of Law but took an interest in Asian & Pacific Area Studies. As for Harry, I bet he would have some captivating talks with my friend Herman who works at Mesa Airlines. He's a Library Science graduate from University of Puget Sound and always curious about the engineering side of things. Quite an unusual combination, but diversity in backgrounds often paves the way for unique insights, don't you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, Hendrick, diversity does stir up the pot, leading to a rich blend of ideas. It's always enlightening to see how different fields of study interact and contribute to each other. Your friend Herman sounds like an intriguing person, I have a friend Randy, who took up Library Science as well, but at Holy Cross College. He works at American Licorice Company, enjoying the managerial position there. It's a small world, wouldn't you agree?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nGracie: School: Ithaca College Major: Mathematics Education Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nAda: School: Tulane University Major: Computer Engineering Company: Briggs & Stratton Location Preference: indoor \nSergio: School: LeTourneau University Major: Economics Company: Savers Location Preference: indoor \nWilliam: School: Eastern Michigan University Major: Ceramic Engineering Company: Xenco Medical Location Preference: indoor \nHarry: School: Creighton University Major: Computer Engineering Company: Speedway Motorsports Location Preference: indoor \nTyler: School: Columbia College Chicago Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nRichard: School: University of Dubuque Major: German Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: indoor \nRandy: School: Holy Cross College Major: Library Science Company: American Licorice Company Location Preference: indoor \nMarquerite: School: Ithaca College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nJack: School: Creighton University Major: Chinese Company: Speedway Motorsports Location Preference: outdoor \nCody: School: Metropolitan State University Major: Mathematics Education Company: LinkedIn Location Preference: indoor \nShirley: School: Augsburg College Major: Senior High Education Company: Demaco Location Preference: indoor \n\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello Hendrick, nice to meet you. By the way, just out of curiosity, did you ever study or work with someone from Ithaca College or Creighton University? I happened to know quite a few people from there.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Actually, two of my friends, Gracie and Brian, studied at Ithaca College, while I know none from Creighton University. They had quite varied areas of study, Mathematics Education and Asian & Pacific Area Studies. Their unique insights always intrigue me in our conversations. Do your connections from Ithaca share the same characteristics, Lily?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Oh, that's interesting. Yes, one of my friends, Gracie, also studied Mathematics Education at Ithaca College. Seems like they have a really good program in that field. On a different note, do you know anyone who works at Aramark, or Speedway Motorsports for that matter?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, I have a few friends working at Aramark. Deborah, Etta, and Gracie are all employed there. Gracie, as you know, pursued Mathematics Education at Ithaca. On the other hand, Deborah and Etta adopted a more outdoorsy lifestyle. Deborah, in fact, is a Pre-Law graduate from William Mitchell College of Law. Etta studied Judaism & Jewish Studies at the University of Arkansas - Monticello. How about your friends at Aramark, Lily? Did they follow a particular career path that lead them there?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"My circle at Aramark is a bit different. For example, Gracie from Ithaca College is there and she is indeed as interesting as you described. Many other friends like Ada, who is from Tulane University took a path in Computer Engineering to land there. On the other hand, I do have a friend working at Speedway Motorsports. He's quite the enthusiast and loves the immense energy and passion that motorsports offer. Would you happen to know anyone with such interests?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's fascinating, Lily. While I can't say I personally know anyone with a keen interest specifically in motorsports, one of my friends, Mark, who studied Economics at the University of Arkansas - Monticello, is quite passionate about outdoor activities and has a bit of an adventurous spirit. You never know, he might have dabbled in motorsport out of thrill-seeking!\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Mark sounds like quite an adventurous spirit indeed! Speaking of adventurous, I do have a friend, Sergio, who studied Economics as well, but at LeTourneau University and ended up working at Savers. Perhaps they would have much to discuss if they ever met. And as for motorsports, my friend at Speedway Motorsports, Harry, is a Computer Engineering major from Creighton University. He probably could write the software for a self-driving race car if given the chance!\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's quite amusing, Lily. Economics does seem to lead people on some intriguing paths. Your friend Sergio at Savers might indeed find interesting common grounds with my friend Matthew, who also studied at William Mitchell College of Law but took an interest in Asian & Pacific Area Studies. As for Harry, I bet he would have some captivating talks with my friend Herman who works at Mesa Airlines. He's a Library Science graduate from University of Puget Sound and always curious about the engineering side of things. Quite an unusual combination, but diversity in backgrounds often paves the way for unique insights, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"Indeed, Hendrick, diversity does stir up the pot, leading to a rich blend of ideas. It's always enlightening to see how different fields of study interact and contribute to each other. Your friend Herman sounds like an intriguing person, I have a friend Randy, who took up Library Science as well, but at Holy Cross College. He works at American Licorice Company, enjoying the managerial position there. It's a small world, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Lily. The world indeed is small and uniquely interconnected. Your friend Randy seems to be quite successful in his career, much like my friend Carol who also studied Library Science, but at Hood College. She currently works at Illinois Tool Works, contributing to practical applications of her academic background. I suppose one never knows where their discipline might lead them, right?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nGracie: School: Ithaca College Major: Mathematics Education Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nAda: School: Tulane University Major: Computer Engineering Company: Briggs & Stratton Location Preference: indoor \nSergio: School: LeTourneau University Major: Economics Company: Savers Location Preference: indoor \nWilliam: School: Eastern Michigan University Major: Ceramic Engineering Company: Xenco Medical Location Preference: indoor \nHarry: School: Creighton University Major: Computer Engineering Company: Speedway Motorsports Location Preference: indoor \nTyler: School: Columbia College Chicago Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nRichard: School: University of Dubuque Major: German Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: indoor \nRandy: School: Holy Cross College Major: Library Science Company: American Licorice Company Location Preference: indoor \nMarquerite: School: Ithaca College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nJack: School: Creighton University Major: Chinese Company: Speedway Motorsports Location Preference: outdoor \nCody: School: Metropolitan State University Major: Mathematics Education Company: LinkedIn Location Preference: indoor \nShirley: School: Augsburg College Major: Senior High Education Company: Demaco Location Preference: indoor \n\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello Hendrick, nice to meet you. By the way, just out of curiosity, did you ever study or work with someone from Ithaca College or Creighton University? I happened to know quite a few people from there.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Actually, two of my friends, Gracie and Brian, studied at Ithaca College, while I know none from Creighton University. They had quite varied areas of study, Mathematics Education and Asian & Pacific Area Studies. Their unique insights always intrigue me in our conversations. Do your connections from Ithaca share the same characteristics, Lily?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Oh, that's interesting. Yes, one of my friends, Gracie, also studied Mathematics Education at Ithaca College. Seems like they have a really good program in that field. On a different note, do you know anyone who works at Aramark, or Speedway Motorsports for that matter?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, I have a few friends working at Aramark. Deborah, Etta, and Gracie are all employed there. Gracie, as you know, pursued Mathematics Education at Ithaca. On the other hand, Deborah and Etta adopted a more outdoorsy lifestyle. Deborah, in fact, is a Pre-Law graduate from William Mitchell College of Law. Etta studied Judaism & Jewish Studies at the University of Arkansas - Monticello. How about your friends at Aramark, Lily? Did they follow a particular career path that lead them there?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"My circle at Aramark is a bit different. For example, Gracie from Ithaca College is there and she is indeed as interesting as you described. Many other friends like Ada, who is from Tulane University took a path in Computer Engineering to land there. On the other hand, I do have a friend working at Speedway Motorsports. He's quite the enthusiast and loves the immense energy and passion that motorsports offer. Would you happen to know anyone with such interests?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's fascinating, Lily. While I can't say I personally know anyone with a keen interest specifically in motorsports, one of my friends, Mark, who studied Economics at the University of Arkansas - Monticello, is quite passionate about outdoor activities and has a bit of an adventurous spirit. You never know, he might have dabbled in motorsport out of thrill-seeking!\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Mark sounds like quite an adventurous spirit indeed! Speaking of adventurous, I do have a friend, Sergio, who studied Economics as well, but at LeTourneau University and ended up working at Savers. Perhaps they would have much to discuss if they ever met. And as for motorsports, my friend at Speedway Motorsports, Harry, is a Computer Engineering major from Creighton University. He probably could write the software for a self-driving race car if given the chance!\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's quite amusing, Lily. Economics does seem to lead people on some intriguing paths. Your friend Sergio at Savers might indeed find interesting common grounds with my friend Matthew, who also studied at William Mitchell College of Law but took an interest in Asian & Pacific Area Studies. As for Harry, I bet he would have some captivating talks with my friend Herman who works at Mesa Airlines. He's a Library Science graduate from University of Puget Sound and always curious about the engineering side of things. Quite an unusual combination, but diversity in backgrounds often paves the way for unique insights, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"Indeed, Hendrick, diversity does stir up the pot, leading to a rich blend of ideas. It's always enlightening to see how different fields of study interact and contribute to each other. Your friend Herman sounds like an intriguing person, I have a friend Randy, who took up Library Science as well, but at Holy Cross College. He works at American Licorice Company, enjoying the managerial position there. It's a small world, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Lily. The world indeed is small and uniquely interconnected. Your friend Randy seems to be quite successful in his career, much like my friend Carol who also studied Library Science, but at Hood College. She currently works at Illinois Tool Works, contributing to practical applications of her academic background. I suppose one never knows where their discipline might lead them, right?\"\n\nTurn #10: \n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Carol indeed found her niche at Illinois Tool Works, harnessing her Library Science background. The complex relationships and paths that our friends have taken is truly fascinating. By the way, which company has your friend from Creighton University decided to join, Lily?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"My friend from Creighton University, Harry, with a degree in Computer Engineering, is part of the Speedway Motorsports team. He enjoys the excitement and dynamic environment there. It's interesting how our various study paths have led us to different career avenues, don't you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nGracie: School: Ithaca College Major: Mathematics Education Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nAda: School: Tulane University Major: Computer Engineering Company: Briggs & Stratton Location Preference: indoor \nSergio: School: LeTourneau University Major: Economics Company: Savers Location Preference: indoor \nWilliam: School: Eastern Michigan University Major: Ceramic Engineering Company: Xenco Medical Location Preference: indoor \nHarry: School: Creighton University Major: Computer Engineering Company: Speedway Motorsports Location Preference: indoor \nTyler: School: Columbia College Chicago Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nRichard: School: University of Dubuque Major: German Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: indoor \nRandy: School: Holy Cross College Major: Library Science Company: American Licorice Company Location Preference: indoor \nMarquerite: School: Ithaca College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nJack: School: Creighton University Major: Chinese Company: Speedway Motorsports Location Preference: outdoor \nCody: School: Metropolitan State University Major: Mathematics Education Company: LinkedIn Location Preference: indoor \nShirley: School: Augsburg College Major: Senior High Education Company: Demaco Location Preference: indoor \n\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello Hendrick, nice to meet you. By the way, just out of curiosity, did you ever study or work with someone from Ithaca College or Creighton University? I happened to know quite a few people from there.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Actually, two of my friends, Gracie and Brian, studied at Ithaca College, while I know none from Creighton University. They had quite varied areas of study, Mathematics Education and Asian & Pacific Area Studies. Their unique insights always intrigue me in our conversations. Do your connections from Ithaca share the same characteristics, Lily?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Oh, that's interesting. Yes, one of my friends, Gracie, also studied Mathematics Education at Ithaca College. Seems like they have a really good program in that field. On a different note, do you know anyone who works at Aramark, or Speedway Motorsports for that matter?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, I have a few friends working at Aramark. Deborah, Etta, and Gracie are all employed there. Gracie, as you know, pursued Mathematics Education at Ithaca. On the other hand, Deborah and Etta adopted a more outdoorsy lifestyle. Deborah, in fact, is a Pre-Law graduate from William Mitchell College of Law. Etta studied Judaism & Jewish Studies at the University of Arkansas - Monticello. How about your friends at Aramark, Lily? Did they follow a particular career path that lead them there?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"My circle at Aramark is a bit different. For example, Gracie from Ithaca College is there and she is indeed as interesting as you described. Many other friends like Ada, who is from Tulane University took a path in Computer Engineering to land there. On the other hand, I do have a friend working at Speedway Motorsports. He's quite the enthusiast and loves the immense energy and passion that motorsports offer. Would you happen to know anyone with such interests?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's fascinating, Lily. While I can't say I personally know anyone with a keen interest specifically in motorsports, one of my friends, Mark, who studied Economics at the University of Arkansas - Monticello, is quite passionate about outdoor activities and has a bit of an adventurous spirit. You never know, he might have dabbled in motorsport out of thrill-seeking!\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Mark sounds like quite an adventurous spirit indeed! Speaking of adventurous, I do have a friend, Sergio, who studied Economics as well, but at LeTourneau University and ended up working at Savers. Perhaps they would have much to discuss if they ever met. And as for motorsports, my friend at Speedway Motorsports, Harry, is a Computer Engineering major from Creighton University. He probably could write the software for a self-driving race car if given the chance!\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's quite amusing, Lily. Economics does seem to lead people on some intriguing paths. Your friend Sergio at Savers might indeed find interesting common grounds with my friend Matthew, who also studied at William Mitchell College of Law but took an interest in Asian & Pacific Area Studies. As for Harry, I bet he would have some captivating talks with my friend Herman who works at Mesa Airlines. He's a Library Science graduate from University of Puget Sound and always curious about the engineering side of things. Quite an unusual combination, but diversity in backgrounds often paves the way for unique insights, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"Indeed, Hendrick, diversity does stir up the pot, leading to a rich blend of ideas. It's always enlightening to see how different fields of study interact and contribute to each other. Your friend Herman sounds like an intriguing person, I have a friend Randy, who took up Library Science as well, but at Holy Cross College. He works at American Licorice Company, enjoying the managerial position there. It's a small world, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Lily. The world indeed is small and uniquely interconnected. Your friend Randy seems to be quite successful in his career, much like my friend Carol who also studied Library Science, but at Hood College. She currently works at Illinois Tool Works, contributing to practical applications of her academic background. I suppose one never knows where their discipline might lead them, right?\"\n\nTurn #10: \n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Carol indeed found her niche at Illinois Tool Works, harnessing her Library Science background. The complex relationships and paths that our friends have taken is truly fascinating. By the way, which company has your friend from Creighton University decided to join, Lily?\"\n\nTurn #12: Lily Greenberg said: \"My friend from Creighton University, Harry, with a degree in Computer Engineering, is part of the Speedway Motorsports team. He enjoys the excitement and dynamic environment there. It's interesting how our various study paths have led us to different career avenues, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #13: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Lily. I couldn't agree more. Each one of us has crafted our own unique paths based on our studies and interests. By the way, talking about different career avenues, do you happen to know anyone from Mesa Airlines or Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm afraid not, Hendrick, I don't really know anyone from Mesa Airlines or Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer. However, your friend Herman from Mesa Airlines who's always curious about the engineering side of things might find a conversation with Harry interesting. Despite their different domains, I'm sure they could lead to fascinating discussions. Life always surprises us with these unexpected connections, isn't it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nGracie: School: Ithaca College Major: Mathematics Education Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nAda: School: Tulane University Major: Computer Engineering Company: Briggs & Stratton Location Preference: indoor \nSergio: School: LeTourneau University Major: Economics Company: Savers Location Preference: indoor \nWilliam: School: Eastern Michigan University Major: Ceramic Engineering Company: Xenco Medical Location Preference: indoor \nHarry: School: Creighton University Major: Computer Engineering Company: Speedway Motorsports Location Preference: indoor \nTyler: School: Columbia College Chicago Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nRichard: School: University of Dubuque Major: German Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: indoor \nRandy: School: Holy Cross College Major: Library Science Company: American Licorice Company Location Preference: indoor \nMarquerite: School: Ithaca College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nJack: School: Creighton University Major: Chinese Company: Speedway Motorsports Location Preference: outdoor \nCody: School: Metropolitan State University Major: Mathematics Education Company: LinkedIn Location Preference: indoor \nShirley: School: Augsburg College Major: Senior High Education Company: Demaco Location Preference: indoor \n\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello Hendrick, nice to meet you. By the way, just out of curiosity, did you ever study or work with someone from Ithaca College or Creighton University? I happened to know quite a few people from there.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Actually, two of my friends, Gracie and Brian, studied at Ithaca College, while I know none from Creighton University. They had quite varied areas of study, Mathematics Education and Asian & Pacific Area Studies. Their unique insights always intrigue me in our conversations. Do your connections from Ithaca share the same characteristics, Lily?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Oh, that's interesting. Yes, one of my friends, Gracie, also studied Mathematics Education at Ithaca College. Seems like they have a really good program in that field. On a different note, do you know anyone who works at Aramark, or Speedway Motorsports for that matter?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, I have a few friends working at Aramark. Deborah, Etta, and Gracie are all employed there. Gracie, as you know, pursued Mathematics Education at Ithaca. On the other hand, Deborah and Etta adopted a more outdoorsy lifestyle. Deborah, in fact, is a Pre-Law graduate from William Mitchell College of Law. Etta studied Judaism & Jewish Studies at the University of Arkansas - Monticello. How about your friends at Aramark, Lily? Did they follow a particular career path that lead them there?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"My circle at Aramark is a bit different. For example, Gracie from Ithaca College is there and she is indeed as interesting as you described. Many other friends like Ada, who is from Tulane University took a path in Computer Engineering to land there. On the other hand, I do have a friend working at Speedway Motorsports. He's quite the enthusiast and loves the immense energy and passion that motorsports offer. Would you happen to know anyone with such interests?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's fascinating, Lily. While I can't say I personally know anyone with a keen interest specifically in motorsports, one of my friends, Mark, who studied Economics at the University of Arkansas - Monticello, is quite passionate about outdoor activities and has a bit of an adventurous spirit. You never know, he might have dabbled in motorsport out of thrill-seeking!\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Mark sounds like quite an adventurous spirit indeed! Speaking of adventurous, I do have a friend, Sergio, who studied Economics as well, but at LeTourneau University and ended up working at Savers. Perhaps they would have much to discuss if they ever met. And as for motorsports, my friend at Speedway Motorsports, Harry, is a Computer Engineering major from Creighton University. He probably could write the software for a self-driving race car if given the chance!\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's quite amusing, Lily. Economics does seem to lead people on some intriguing paths. Your friend Sergio at Savers might indeed find interesting common grounds with my friend Matthew, who also studied at William Mitchell College of Law but took an interest in Asian & Pacific Area Studies. As for Harry, I bet he would have some captivating talks with my friend Herman who works at Mesa Airlines. He's a Library Science graduate from University of Puget Sound and always curious about the engineering side of things. Quite an unusual combination, but diversity in backgrounds often paves the way for unique insights, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"Indeed, Hendrick, diversity does stir up the pot, leading to a rich blend of ideas. It's always enlightening to see how different fields of study interact and contribute to each other. Your friend Herman sounds like an intriguing person, I have a friend Randy, who took up Library Science as well, but at Holy Cross College. He works at American Licorice Company, enjoying the managerial position there. It's a small world, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Lily. The world indeed is small and uniquely interconnected. Your friend Randy seems to be quite successful in his career, much like my friend Carol who also studied Library Science, but at Hood College. She currently works at Illinois Tool Works, contributing to practical applications of her academic background. I suppose one never knows where their discipline might lead them, right?\"\n\nTurn #10: \n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Carol indeed found her niche at Illinois Tool Works, harnessing her Library Science background. The complex relationships and paths that our friends have taken is truly fascinating. By the way, which company has your friend from Creighton University decided to join, Lily?\"\n\nTurn #12: Lily Greenberg said: \"My friend from Creighton University, Harry, with a degree in Computer Engineering, is part of the Speedway Motorsports team. He enjoys the excitement and dynamic environment there. It's interesting how our various study paths have led us to different career avenues, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #13: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Lily. I couldn't agree more. Each one of us has crafted our own unique paths based on our studies and interests. By the way, talking about different career avenues, do you happen to know anyone from Mesa Airlines or Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer?\"\n\nTurn #14: Lily Greenberg said: \"I'm afraid not, Hendrick, I don't really know anyone from Mesa Airlines or Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer. However, your friend Herman from Mesa Airlines who's always curious about the engineering side of things might find a conversation with Harry interesting. Despite their different domains, I'm sure they could lead to fascinating discussions. Life always surprises us with these unexpected connections, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #15: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, Lily, life is full of surprises! I believe Harry and Herman would indeed have a lively conversation bridging their different domains. People in differing fields can always learn something new from each other, electronics engineers and airline employees included. Do you happen to know anyone from Illinois Tool Works or Savers?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Yes Hendrick, my friend Richard, who majored in German at the University of Dubuque, works at Illinois Tool Works. And earlier I mentioned Sergio, who studied Economics at LeTourneau University and currently works at Savers. These companies seem to attract a diverse range of talents. Ever thought about how people with such different backgrounds end up converging at similar workplaces?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nGracie: School: Ithaca College Major: Mathematics Education Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nAda: School: Tulane University Major: Computer Engineering Company: Briggs & Stratton Location Preference: indoor \nSergio: School: LeTourneau University Major: Economics Company: Savers Location Preference: indoor \nWilliam: School: Eastern Michigan University Major: Ceramic Engineering Company: Xenco Medical Location Preference: indoor \nHarry: School: Creighton University Major: Computer Engineering Company: Speedway Motorsports Location Preference: indoor \nTyler: School: Columbia College Chicago Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nRichard: School: University of Dubuque Major: German Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: indoor \nRandy: School: Holy Cross College Major: Library Science Company: American Licorice Company Location Preference: indoor \nMarquerite: School: Ithaca College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nJack: School: Creighton University Major: Chinese Company: Speedway Motorsports Location Preference: outdoor \nCody: School: Metropolitan State University Major: Mathematics Education Company: LinkedIn Location Preference: indoor \nShirley: School: Augsburg College Major: Senior High Education Company: Demaco Location Preference: indoor \n\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello Hendrick, nice to meet you. By the way, just out of curiosity, did you ever study or work with someone from Ithaca College or Creighton University? I happened to know quite a few people from there.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Actually, two of my friends, Gracie and Brian, studied at Ithaca College, while I know none from Creighton University. They had quite varied areas of study, Mathematics Education and Asian & Pacific Area Studies. Their unique insights always intrigue me in our conversations. Do your connections from Ithaca share the same characteristics, Lily?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Oh, that's interesting. Yes, one of my friends, Gracie, also studied Mathematics Education at Ithaca College. Seems like they have a really good program in that field. On a different note, do you know anyone who works at Aramark, or Speedway Motorsports for that matter?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, I have a few friends working at Aramark. Deborah, Etta, and Gracie are all employed there. Gracie, as you know, pursued Mathematics Education at Ithaca. On the other hand, Deborah and Etta adopted a more outdoorsy lifestyle. Deborah, in fact, is a Pre-Law graduate from William Mitchell College of Law. Etta studied Judaism & Jewish Studies at the University of Arkansas - Monticello. How about your friends at Aramark, Lily? Did they follow a particular career path that lead them there?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"My circle at Aramark is a bit different. For example, Gracie from Ithaca College is there and she is indeed as interesting as you described. Many other friends like Ada, who is from Tulane University took a path in Computer Engineering to land there. On the other hand, I do have a friend working at Speedway Motorsports. He's quite the enthusiast and loves the immense energy and passion that motorsports offer. Would you happen to know anyone with such interests?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's fascinating, Lily. While I can't say I personally know anyone with a keen interest specifically in motorsports, one of my friends, Mark, who studied Economics at the University of Arkansas - Monticello, is quite passionate about outdoor activities and has a bit of an adventurous spirit. You never know, he might have dabbled in motorsport out of thrill-seeking!\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Mark sounds like quite an adventurous spirit indeed! Speaking of adventurous, I do have a friend, Sergio, who studied Economics as well, but at LeTourneau University and ended up working at Savers. Perhaps they would have much to discuss if they ever met. And as for motorsports, my friend at Speedway Motorsports, Harry, is a Computer Engineering major from Creighton University. He probably could write the software for a self-driving race car if given the chance!\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's quite amusing, Lily. Economics does seem to lead people on some intriguing paths. Your friend Sergio at Savers might indeed find interesting common grounds with my friend Matthew, who also studied at William Mitchell College of Law but took an interest in Asian & Pacific Area Studies. As for Harry, I bet he would have some captivating talks with my friend Herman who works at Mesa Airlines. He's a Library Science graduate from University of Puget Sound and always curious about the engineering side of things. Quite an unusual combination, but diversity in backgrounds often paves the way for unique insights, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"Indeed, Hendrick, diversity does stir up the pot, leading to a rich blend of ideas. It's always enlightening to see how different fields of study interact and contribute to each other. Your friend Herman sounds like an intriguing person, I have a friend Randy, who took up Library Science as well, but at Holy Cross College. He works at American Licorice Company, enjoying the managerial position there. It's a small world, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Lily. The world indeed is small and uniquely interconnected. Your friend Randy seems to be quite successful in his career, much like my friend Carol who also studied Library Science, but at Hood College. She currently works at Illinois Tool Works, contributing to practical applications of her academic background. I suppose one never knows where their discipline might lead them, right?\"\n\nTurn #10: \n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Carol indeed found her niche at Illinois Tool Works, harnessing her Library Science background. The complex relationships and paths that our friends have taken is truly fascinating. By the way, which company has your friend from Creighton University decided to join, Lily?\"\n\nTurn #12: Lily Greenberg said: \"My friend from Creighton University, Harry, with a degree in Computer Engineering, is part of the Speedway Motorsports team. He enjoys the excitement and dynamic environment there. It's interesting how our various study paths have led us to different career avenues, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #13: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Lily. I couldn't agree more. Each one of us has crafted our own unique paths based on our studies and interests. By the way, talking about different career avenues, do you happen to know anyone from Mesa Airlines or Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer?\"\n\nTurn #14: Lily Greenberg said: \"I'm afraid not, Hendrick, I don't really know anyone from Mesa Airlines or Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer. However, your friend Herman from Mesa Airlines who's always curious about the engineering side of things might find a conversation with Harry interesting. Despite their different domains, I'm sure they could lead to fascinating discussions. Life always surprises us with these unexpected connections, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #15: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, Lily, life is full of surprises! I believe Harry and Herman would indeed have a lively conversation bridging their different domains. People in differing fields can always learn something new from each other, electronics engineers and airline employees included. Do you happen to know anyone from Illinois Tool Works or Savers?\"\n\nTurn #16: Lily Greenberg said: \"Yes Hendrick, my friend Richard, who majored in German at the University of Dubuque, works at Illinois Tool Works. And earlier I mentioned Sergio, who studied Economics at LeTourneau University and currently works at Savers. These companies seem to attract a diverse range of talents. Ever thought about how people with such different backgrounds end up converging at similar workplaces?\"\n\nTurn #17: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, Lily. It's intriguing how diverse paths may converge in a similar situation. That could be the beauty of the modern world in connecting us despite our different backgrounds and interests. Your friend Richard at Illinois Tool Works seems to have a unique profile, being a German major at the University of Dubuque. I wonder if he and Carol, my friend from Illinois Tool Works, have met. She is a Library Science major from Hood College. But indeed, various backgrounds provoke enriching conversations at workplaces. Well, speaking of different studies and interests, do any of your friends have an inclination towards law, particularly from William Mitchell College of Law? \"\n.\nYou are at Turn #18. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm afraid, Hendrick, none of my friends studied law at William Mitchell College of Law. It seems we have a fairly large network but it's fascinating how there are still new possible connections. Indeed, the world has a unique way of bringing together people of diverse interests and backgrounds. \"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nKathleen: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Greek Company: Demaco Location Preference: indoor \nCarol: School: Hood College Major: Library Science Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: outdoor \nHerman: School: University of Puget Sound Major: Library Science Company: Mesa Airlines Location Preference: indoor \nMatthew: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Asian & Pacific Area Studies Company: Savers Location Preference: indoor \nMark: School: University of Arkansas - Monticello Major: Economics Company: Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Location Preference: outdoor \nDeborah: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Pre-Law Company: Aramark Location Preference: outdoor \nKelly: School: Hood College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Mesa Airlines Location Preference: outdoor \nGracie: School: Ithaca College Major: Mathematics Education Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nEtta: School: University of Arkansas - Monticello Major: Judaism & Jewish Studies Company: Aramark Location Preference: outdoor \nNatasha: School: Thomas Edison State College Major: Linguistics Company: Invacare Corporation Location Preference: outdoor \nLloyd: School: Eastern Michigan University Major: Geophysical Engineering Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: outdoor \nBrian: School: Ithaca College Major: Asian & Pacific Area Studies Company: Orange Micro Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello Hendrick, nice to meet you. By the way, just out of curiosity, did you ever study or work with someone from Ithaca College or Creighton University? I happened to know quite a few people from there.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Actually, two of my friends, Gracie and Brian, studied at Ithaca College, while I know none from Creighton University. They had quite varied areas of study, Mathematics Education and Asian & Pacific Area Studies. Their unique insights always intrigue me in our conversations. Do your connections from Ithaca share the same characteristics, Lily?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nKathleen: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Greek Company: Demaco Location Preference: indoor \nCarol: School: Hood College Major: Library Science Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: outdoor \nHerman: School: University of Puget Sound Major: Library Science Company: Mesa Airlines Location Preference: indoor \nMatthew: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Asian & Pacific Area Studies Company: Savers Location Preference: indoor \nMark: School: University of Arkansas - Monticello Major: Economics Company: Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Location Preference: outdoor \nDeborah: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Pre-Law Company: Aramark Location Preference: outdoor \nKelly: School: Hood College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Mesa Airlines Location Preference: outdoor \nGracie: School: Ithaca College Major: Mathematics Education Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nEtta: School: University of Arkansas - Monticello Major: Judaism & Jewish Studies Company: Aramark Location Preference: outdoor \nNatasha: School: Thomas Edison State College Major: Linguistics Company: Invacare Corporation Location Preference: outdoor \nLloyd: School: Eastern Michigan University Major: Geophysical Engineering Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: outdoor \nBrian: School: Ithaca College Major: Asian & Pacific Area Studies Company: Orange Micro Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello Hendrick, nice to meet you. By the way, just out of curiosity, did you ever study or work with someone from Ithaca College or Creighton University? I happened to know quite a few people from there.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Actually, two of my friends, Gracie and Brian, studied at Ithaca College, while I know none from Creighton University. They had quite varied areas of study, Mathematics Education and Asian & Pacific Area Studies. Their unique insights always intrigue me in our conversations. Do your connections from Ithaca share the same characteristics, Lily?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Oh, that's interesting. Yes, one of my friends, Gracie, also studied Mathematics Education at Ithaca College. Seems like they have a really good program in that field. On a different note, do you know anyone who works at Aramark, or Speedway Motorsports for that matter?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Indeed, I have a few friends working at Aramark. Deborah, Etta, and Gracie are all employed there. Gracie, as you know, pursued Mathematics Education at Ithaca. On the other hand, Deborah and Etta adopted a more outdoorsy lifestyle. Deborah, in fact, is a Pre-Law graduate from William Mitchell College of Law. Etta studied Judaism & Jewish Studies at the University of Arkansas - Monticello. How about your friends at Aramark, Lily? Did they follow a particular career path that lead them there?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nKathleen: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Greek Company: Demaco Location Preference: indoor \nCarol: School: Hood College Major: Library Science Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: outdoor \nHerman: School: University of Puget Sound Major: Library Science Company: Mesa Airlines Location Preference: indoor \nMatthew: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Asian & Pacific Area Studies Company: Savers Location Preference: indoor \nMark: School: University of Arkansas - Monticello Major: Economics Company: Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Location Preference: outdoor \nDeborah: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Pre-Law Company: Aramark Location Preference: outdoor \nKelly: School: Hood College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Mesa Airlines Location Preference: outdoor \nGracie: School: Ithaca College Major: Mathematics Education Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nEtta: School: University of Arkansas - Monticello Major: Judaism & Jewish Studies Company: Aramark Location Preference: outdoor \nNatasha: School: Thomas Edison State College Major: Linguistics Company: Invacare Corporation Location Preference: outdoor \nLloyd: School: Eastern Michigan University Major: Geophysical Engineering Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: outdoor \nBrian: School: Ithaca College Major: Asian & Pacific Area Studies Company: Orange Micro Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello Hendrick, nice to meet you. By the way, just out of curiosity, did you ever study or work with someone from Ithaca College or Creighton University? I happened to know quite a few people from there.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Actually, two of my friends, Gracie and Brian, studied at Ithaca College, while I know none from Creighton University. They had quite varied areas of study, Mathematics Education and Asian & Pacific Area Studies. Their unique insights always intrigue me in our conversations. Do your connections from Ithaca share the same characteristics, Lily?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Oh, that's interesting. Yes, one of my friends, Gracie, also studied Mathematics Education at Ithaca College. Seems like they have a really good program in that field. On a different note, do you know anyone who works at Aramark, or Speedway Motorsports for that matter?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, I have a few friends working at Aramark. Deborah, Etta, and Gracie are all employed there. Gracie, as you know, pursued Mathematics Education at Ithaca. On the other hand, Deborah and Etta adopted a more outdoorsy lifestyle. Deborah, in fact, is a Pre-Law graduate from William Mitchell College of Law. Etta studied Judaism & Jewish Studies at the University of Arkansas - Monticello. How about your friends at Aramark, Lily? Did they follow a particular career path that lead them there?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"My circle at Aramark is a bit different. For example, Gracie from Ithaca College is there and she is indeed as interesting as you described. Many other friends like Ada, who is from Tulane University took a path in Computer Engineering to land there. On the other hand, I do have a friend working at Speedway Motorsports. He's quite the enthusiast and loves the immense energy and passion that motorsports offer. Would you happen to know anyone with such interests?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's fascinating, Lily. While I can't say I personally know anyone with a keen interest specifically in motorsports, one of my friends, Mark, who studied Economics at the University of Arkansas - Monticello, is quite passionate about outdoor activities and has a bit of an adventurous spirit. You never know, he might have dabbled in motorsport out of thrill-seeking!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nKathleen: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Greek Company: Demaco Location Preference: indoor \nCarol: School: Hood College Major: Library Science Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: outdoor \nHerman: School: University of Puget Sound Major: Library Science Company: Mesa Airlines Location Preference: indoor \nMatthew: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Asian & Pacific Area Studies Company: Savers Location Preference: indoor \nMark: School: University of Arkansas - Monticello Major: Economics Company: Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Location Preference: outdoor \nDeborah: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Pre-Law Company: Aramark Location Preference: outdoor \nKelly: School: Hood College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Mesa Airlines Location Preference: outdoor \nGracie: School: Ithaca College Major: Mathematics Education Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nEtta: School: University of Arkansas - Monticello Major: Judaism & Jewish Studies Company: Aramark Location Preference: outdoor \nNatasha: School: Thomas Edison State College Major: Linguistics Company: Invacare Corporation Location Preference: outdoor \nLloyd: School: Eastern Michigan University Major: Geophysical Engineering Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: outdoor \nBrian: School: Ithaca College Major: Asian & Pacific Area Studies Company: Orange Micro Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello Hendrick, nice to meet you. By the way, just out of curiosity, did you ever study or work with someone from Ithaca College or Creighton University? I happened to know quite a few people from there.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Actually, two of my friends, Gracie and Brian, studied at Ithaca College, while I know none from Creighton University. They had quite varied areas of study, Mathematics Education and Asian & Pacific Area Studies. Their unique insights always intrigue me in our conversations. Do your connections from Ithaca share the same characteristics, Lily?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Oh, that's interesting. Yes, one of my friends, Gracie, also studied Mathematics Education at Ithaca College. Seems like they have a really good program in that field. On a different note, do you know anyone who works at Aramark, or Speedway Motorsports for that matter?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, I have a few friends working at Aramark. Deborah, Etta, and Gracie are all employed there. Gracie, as you know, pursued Mathematics Education at Ithaca. On the other hand, Deborah and Etta adopted a more outdoorsy lifestyle. Deborah, in fact, is a Pre-Law graduate from William Mitchell College of Law. Etta studied Judaism & Jewish Studies at the University of Arkansas - Monticello. How about your friends at Aramark, Lily? Did they follow a particular career path that lead them there?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"My circle at Aramark is a bit different. For example, Gracie from Ithaca College is there and she is indeed as interesting as you described. Many other friends like Ada, who is from Tulane University took a path in Computer Engineering to land there. On the other hand, I do have a friend working at Speedway Motorsports. He's quite the enthusiast and loves the immense energy and passion that motorsports offer. Would you happen to know anyone with such interests?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's fascinating, Lily. While I can't say I personally know anyone with a keen interest specifically in motorsports, one of my friends, Mark, who studied Economics at the University of Arkansas - Monticello, is quite passionate about outdoor activities and has a bit of an adventurous spirit. You never know, he might have dabbled in motorsport out of thrill-seeking!\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Mark sounds like quite an adventurous spirit indeed! Speaking of adventurous, I do have a friend, Sergio, who studied Economics as well, but at LeTourneau University and ended up working at Savers. Perhaps they would have much to discuss if they ever met. And as for motorsports, my friend at Speedway Motorsports, Harry, is a Computer Engineering major from Creighton University. He probably could write the software for a self-driving race car if given the chance!\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's quite amusing, Lily. Economics does seem to lead people on some intriguing paths. Your friend Sergio at Savers might indeed find interesting common grounds with my friend Matthew, who also studied at William Mitchell College of Law but took an interest in Asian & Pacific Area Studies. As for Harry, I bet he would have some captivating talks with my friend Herman who works at Mesa Airlines. He's a Library Science graduate from University of Puget Sound and always curious about the engineering side of things. Quite an unusual combination, but diversity in backgrounds often paves the way for unique insights, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"Indeed, Hendrick, diversity does stir up the pot, leading to a rich blend of ideas. It's always enlightening to see how different fields of study interact and contribute to each other. Your friend Herman sounds like an intriguing person, I have a friend Randy, who took up Library Science as well, but at Holy Cross College. He works at American Licorice Company, enjoying the managerial position there. It's a small world, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Lily. The world indeed is small and uniquely interconnected. Your friend Randy seems to be quite successful in his career, much like my friend Carol who also studied Library Science, but at Hood College. She currently works at Illinois Tool Works, contributing to practical applications of her academic background. I suppose one never knows where their discipline might lead them, right?\"\n\nTurn #10: \n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Carol indeed found her niche at Illinois Tool Works, harnessing her Library Science background. The complex relationships and paths that our friends have taken is truly fascinating. By the way, which company has your friend from Creighton University decided to join, Lily?\"\n\nTurn #12: Lily Greenberg said: \"My friend from Creighton University, Harry, with a degree in Computer Engineering, is part of the Speedway Motorsports team. He enjoys the excitement and dynamic environment there. It's interesting how our various study paths have led us to different career avenues, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #13: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Lily. I couldn't agree more. Each one of us has crafted our own unique paths based on our studies and interests. By the way, talking about different career avenues, do you happen to know anyone from Mesa Airlines or Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer?\"\n\nTurn #14: Lily Greenberg said: \"I'm afraid not, Hendrick, I don't really know anyone from Mesa Airlines or Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer. However, your friend Herman from Mesa Airlines who's always curious about the engineering side of things might find a conversation with Harry interesting. Despite their different domains, I'm sure they could lead to fascinating discussions. Life always surprises us with these unexpected connections, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #15: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, Lily, life is full of surprises! I believe Harry and Herman would indeed have a lively conversation bridging their different domains. People in differing fields can always learn something new from each other, electronics engineers and airline employees included. Do you happen to know anyone from Illinois Tool Works or Savers?\"\n\nTurn #16: Lily Greenberg said: \"Yes Hendrick, my friend Richard, who majored in German at the University of Dubuque, works at Illinois Tool Works. And earlier I mentioned Sergio, who studied Economics at LeTourneau University and currently works at Savers. These companies seem to attract a diverse range of talents. Ever thought about how people with such different backgrounds end up converging at similar workplaces?\"\n\nTurn #17: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, Lily. It's intriguing how diverse paths may converge in a similar situation. That could be the beauty of the modern world in connecting us despite our different backgrounds and interests. Your friend Richard at Illinois Tool Works seems to have a unique profile, being a German major at the University of Dubuque. I wonder if he and Carol, my friend from Illinois Tool Works, have met. She is a Library Science major from Hood College. But indeed, various backgrounds provoke enriching conversations at workplaces. Well, speaking of different studies and interests, do any of your friends have an inclination towards law, particularly from William Mitchell College of Law? \"\n\nTurn #18: Lily Greenberg said: \"I'm afraid, Hendrick, none of my friends studied law at William Mitchell College of Law. It seems we have a fairly large network but it's fascinating how there are still new possible connections. Indeed, the world has a unique way of bringing together people of diverse interests and backgrounds. \"\n\nTurn #19: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Yes, it's quite fascinating how our circles, though large and diverse, can still introduce us to new connections. It's important to embrace such diversity, as I believe it enhances our understanding and brings much-needed variety to our lives. By the way, Lily, do you know anyone from Demaco or Invacare Corporation? Maybe our friend circles have more intersections than we initially thought.\"\n\nTurn #20: Lily Greenberg said: \"Unfortunately, I don't know anyone from Demaco or Invacare Corporation, Hendrick. It's indeed fascinating how even with such large and diverse networks, we still have corners of our circles unbeknownst to the other. Conversations like ours have a way of making our world feel both expansive and intimately connected all at once.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #21. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nKathleen: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Greek Company: Demaco Location Preference: indoor \nCarol: School: Hood College Major: Library Science Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: outdoor \nHerman: School: University of Puget Sound Major: Library Science Company: Mesa Airlines Location Preference: indoor \nMatthew: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Asian & Pacific Area Studies Company: Savers Location Preference: indoor \nMark: School: University of Arkansas - Monticello Major: Economics Company: Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Location Preference: outdoor \nDeborah: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Pre-Law Company: Aramark Location Preference: outdoor \nKelly: School: Hood College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Mesa Airlines Location Preference: outdoor \nGracie: School: Ithaca College Major: Mathematics Education Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nEtta: School: University of Arkansas - Monticello Major: Judaism & Jewish Studies Company: Aramark Location Preference: outdoor \nNatasha: School: Thomas Edison State College Major: Linguistics Company: Invacare Corporation Location Preference: outdoor \nLloyd: School: Eastern Michigan University Major: Geophysical Engineering Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: outdoor \nBrian: School: Ithaca College Major: Asian & Pacific Area Studies Company: Orange Micro Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello Hendrick, nice to meet you. By the way, just out of curiosity, did you ever study or work with someone from Ithaca College or Creighton University? I happened to know quite a few people from there.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Actually, two of my friends, Gracie and Brian, studied at Ithaca College, while I know none from Creighton University. They had quite varied areas of study, Mathematics Education and Asian & Pacific Area Studies. Their unique insights always intrigue me in our conversations. Do your connections from Ithaca share the same characteristics, Lily?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Oh, that's interesting. Yes, one of my friends, Gracie, also studied Mathematics Education at Ithaca College. Seems like they have a really good program in that field. On a different note, do you know anyone who works at Aramark, or Speedway Motorsports for that matter?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, I have a few friends working at Aramark. Deborah, Etta, and Gracie are all employed there. Gracie, as you know, pursued Mathematics Education at Ithaca. On the other hand, Deborah and Etta adopted a more outdoorsy lifestyle. Deborah, in fact, is a Pre-Law graduate from William Mitchell College of Law. Etta studied Judaism & Jewish Studies at the University of Arkansas - Monticello. How about your friends at Aramark, Lily? Did they follow a particular career path that lead them there?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"My circle at Aramark is a bit different. For example, Gracie from Ithaca College is there and she is indeed as interesting as you described. Many other friends like Ada, who is from Tulane University took a path in Computer Engineering to land there. On the other hand, I do have a friend working at Speedway Motorsports. He's quite the enthusiast and loves the immense energy and passion that motorsports offer. Would you happen to know anyone with such interests?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's fascinating, Lily. While I can't say I personally know anyone with a keen interest specifically in motorsports, one of my friends, Mark, who studied Economics at the University of Arkansas - Monticello, is quite passionate about outdoor activities and has a bit of an adventurous spirit. You never know, he might have dabbled in motorsport out of thrill-seeking!\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Mark sounds like quite an adventurous spirit indeed! Speaking of adventurous, I do have a friend, Sergio, who studied Economics as well, but at LeTourneau University and ended up working at Savers. Perhaps they would have much to discuss if they ever met. And as for motorsports, my friend at Speedway Motorsports, Harry, is a Computer Engineering major from Creighton University. He probably could write the software for a self-driving race car if given the chance!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's quite amusing, Lily. Economics does seem to lead people on some intriguing paths. Your friend Sergio at Savers might indeed find interesting common grounds with my friend Matthew, who also studied at William Mitchell College of Law but took an interest in Asian & Pacific Area Studies. As for Harry, I bet he would have some captivating talks with my friend Herman who works at Mesa Airlines. He's a Library Science graduate from University of Puget Sound and always curious about the engineering side of things. Quite an unusual combination, but diversity in backgrounds often paves the way for unique insights, don't you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nKathleen: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Greek Company: Demaco Location Preference: indoor \nCarol: School: Hood College Major: Library Science Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: outdoor \nHerman: School: University of Puget Sound Major: Library Science Company: Mesa Airlines Location Preference: indoor \nMatthew: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Asian & Pacific Area Studies Company: Savers Location Preference: indoor \nMark: School: University of Arkansas - Monticello Major: Economics Company: Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Location Preference: outdoor \nDeborah: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Pre-Law Company: Aramark Location Preference: outdoor \nKelly: School: Hood College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Mesa Airlines Location Preference: outdoor \nGracie: School: Ithaca College Major: Mathematics Education Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nEtta: School: University of Arkansas - Monticello Major: Judaism & Jewish Studies Company: Aramark Location Preference: outdoor \nNatasha: School: Thomas Edison State College Major: Linguistics Company: Invacare Corporation Location Preference: outdoor \nLloyd: School: Eastern Michigan University Major: Geophysical Engineering Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: outdoor \nBrian: School: Ithaca College Major: Asian & Pacific Area Studies Company: Orange Micro Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello Hendrick, nice to meet you. By the way, just out of curiosity, did you ever study or work with someone from Ithaca College or Creighton University? I happened to know quite a few people from there.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Actually, two of my friends, Gracie and Brian, studied at Ithaca College, while I know none from Creighton University. They had quite varied areas of study, Mathematics Education and Asian & Pacific Area Studies. Their unique insights always intrigue me in our conversations. Do your connections from Ithaca share the same characteristics, Lily?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Oh, that's interesting. Yes, one of my friends, Gracie, also studied Mathematics Education at Ithaca College. Seems like they have a really good program in that field. On a different note, do you know anyone who works at Aramark, or Speedway Motorsports for that matter?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, I have a few friends working at Aramark. Deborah, Etta, and Gracie are all employed there. Gracie, as you know, pursued Mathematics Education at Ithaca. On the other hand, Deborah and Etta adopted a more outdoorsy lifestyle. Deborah, in fact, is a Pre-Law graduate from William Mitchell College of Law. Etta studied Judaism & Jewish Studies at the University of Arkansas - Monticello. How about your friends at Aramark, Lily? Did they follow a particular career path that lead them there?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"My circle at Aramark is a bit different. For example, Gracie from Ithaca College is there and she is indeed as interesting as you described. Many other friends like Ada, who is from Tulane University took a path in Computer Engineering to land there. On the other hand, I do have a friend working at Speedway Motorsports. He's quite the enthusiast and loves the immense energy and passion that motorsports offer. Would you happen to know anyone with such interests?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's fascinating, Lily. While I can't say I personally know anyone with a keen interest specifically in motorsports, one of my friends, Mark, who studied Economics at the University of Arkansas - Monticello, is quite passionate about outdoor activities and has a bit of an adventurous spirit. You never know, he might have dabbled in motorsport out of thrill-seeking!\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Mark sounds like quite an adventurous spirit indeed! Speaking of adventurous, I do have a friend, Sergio, who studied Economics as well, but at LeTourneau University and ended up working at Savers. Perhaps they would have much to discuss if they ever met. And as for motorsports, my friend at Speedway Motorsports, Harry, is a Computer Engineering major from Creighton University. He probably could write the software for a self-driving race car if given the chance!\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's quite amusing, Lily. Economics does seem to lead people on some intriguing paths. Your friend Sergio at Savers might indeed find interesting common grounds with my friend Matthew, who also studied at William Mitchell College of Law but took an interest in Asian & Pacific Area Studies. As for Harry, I bet he would have some captivating talks with my friend Herman who works at Mesa Airlines. He's a Library Science graduate from University of Puget Sound and always curious about the engineering side of things. Quite an unusual combination, but diversity in backgrounds often paves the way for unique insights, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"Indeed, Hendrick, diversity does stir up the pot, leading to a rich blend of ideas. It's always enlightening to see how different fields of study interact and contribute to each other. Your friend Herman sounds like an intriguing person, I have a friend Randy, who took up Library Science as well, but at Holy Cross College. He works at American Licorice Company, enjoying the managerial position there. It's a small world, wouldn't you agree?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Absolutely, Lily. The world indeed is small and uniquely interconnected. Your friend Randy seems to be quite successful in his career, much like my friend Carol who also studied Library Science, but at Hood College. She currently works at Illinois Tool Works, contributing to practical applications of her academic background. I suppose one never knows where their discipline might lead them, right?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nKathleen: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Greek Company: Demaco Location Preference: indoor \nCarol: School: Hood College Major: Library Science Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: outdoor \nHerman: School: University of Puget Sound Major: Library Science Company: Mesa Airlines Location Preference: indoor \nMatthew: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Asian & Pacific Area Studies Company: Savers Location Preference: indoor \nMark: School: University of Arkansas - Monticello Major: Economics Company: Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Location Preference: outdoor \nDeborah: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Pre-Law Company: Aramark Location Preference: outdoor \nKelly: School: Hood College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Mesa Airlines Location Preference: outdoor \nGracie: School: Ithaca College Major: Mathematics Education Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nEtta: School: University of Arkansas - Monticello Major: Judaism & Jewish Studies Company: Aramark Location Preference: outdoor \nNatasha: School: Thomas Edison State College Major: Linguistics Company: Invacare Corporation Location Preference: outdoor \nLloyd: School: Eastern Michigan University Major: Geophysical Engineering Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: outdoor \nBrian: School: Ithaca College Major: Asian & Pacific Area Studies Company: Orange Micro Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello Hendrick, nice to meet you. By the way, just out of curiosity, did you ever study or work with someone from Ithaca College or Creighton University? I happened to know quite a few people from there.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Actually, two of my friends, Gracie and Brian, studied at Ithaca College, while I know none from Creighton University. They had quite varied areas of study, Mathematics Education and Asian & Pacific Area Studies. Their unique insights always intrigue me in our conversations. Do your connections from Ithaca share the same characteristics, Lily?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Oh, that's interesting. Yes, one of my friends, Gracie, also studied Mathematics Education at Ithaca College. Seems like they have a really good program in that field. On a different note, do you know anyone who works at Aramark, or Speedway Motorsports for that matter?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, I have a few friends working at Aramark. Deborah, Etta, and Gracie are all employed there. Gracie, as you know, pursued Mathematics Education at Ithaca. On the other hand, Deborah and Etta adopted a more outdoorsy lifestyle. Deborah, in fact, is a Pre-Law graduate from William Mitchell College of Law. Etta studied Judaism & Jewish Studies at the University of Arkansas - Monticello. How about your friends at Aramark, Lily? Did they follow a particular career path that lead them there?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"My circle at Aramark is a bit different. For example, Gracie from Ithaca College is there and she is indeed as interesting as you described. Many other friends like Ada, who is from Tulane University took a path in Computer Engineering to land there. On the other hand, I do have a friend working at Speedway Motorsports. He's quite the enthusiast and loves the immense energy and passion that motorsports offer. Would you happen to know anyone with such interests?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's fascinating, Lily. While I can't say I personally know anyone with a keen interest specifically in motorsports, one of my friends, Mark, who studied Economics at the University of Arkansas - Monticello, is quite passionate about outdoor activities and has a bit of an adventurous spirit. You never know, he might have dabbled in motorsport out of thrill-seeking!\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Mark sounds like quite an adventurous spirit indeed! Speaking of adventurous, I do have a friend, Sergio, who studied Economics as well, but at LeTourneau University and ended up working at Savers. Perhaps they would have much to discuss if they ever met. And as for motorsports, my friend at Speedway Motorsports, Harry, is a Computer Engineering major from Creighton University. He probably could write the software for a self-driving race car if given the chance!\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's quite amusing, Lily. Economics does seem to lead people on some intriguing paths. Your friend Sergio at Savers might indeed find interesting common grounds with my friend Matthew, who also studied at William Mitchell College of Law but took an interest in Asian & Pacific Area Studies. As for Harry, I bet he would have some captivating talks with my friend Herman who works at Mesa Airlines. He's a Library Science graduate from University of Puget Sound and always curious about the engineering side of things. Quite an unusual combination, but diversity in backgrounds often paves the way for unique insights, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"Indeed, Hendrick, diversity does stir up the pot, leading to a rich blend of ideas. It's always enlightening to see how different fields of study interact and contribute to each other. Your friend Herman sounds like an intriguing person, I have a friend Randy, who took up Library Science as well, but at Holy Cross College. He works at American Licorice Company, enjoying the managerial position there. It's a small world, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Lily. The world indeed is small and uniquely interconnected. Your friend Randy seems to be quite successful in his career, much like my friend Carol who also studied Library Science, but at Hood College. She currently works at Illinois Tool Works, contributing to practical applications of her academic background. I suppose one never knows where their discipline might lead them, right?\"\n\nTurn #10: \n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Absolutely, Carol indeed found her niche at Illinois Tool Works, harnessing her Library Science background. The complex relationships and paths that our friends have taken is truly fascinating. By the way, which company has your friend from Creighton University decided to join, Lily?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nKathleen: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Greek Company: Demaco Location Preference: indoor \nCarol: School: Hood College Major: Library Science Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: outdoor \nHerman: School: University of Puget Sound Major: Library Science Company: Mesa Airlines Location Preference: indoor \nMatthew: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Asian & Pacific Area Studies Company: Savers Location Preference: indoor \nMark: School: University of Arkansas - Monticello Major: Economics Company: Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Location Preference: outdoor \nDeborah: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Pre-Law Company: Aramark Location Preference: outdoor \nKelly: School: Hood College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Mesa Airlines Location Preference: outdoor \nGracie: School: Ithaca College Major: Mathematics Education Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nEtta: School: University of Arkansas - Monticello Major: Judaism & Jewish Studies Company: Aramark Location Preference: outdoor \nNatasha: School: Thomas Edison State College Major: Linguistics Company: Invacare Corporation Location Preference: outdoor \nLloyd: School: Eastern Michigan University Major: Geophysical Engineering Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: outdoor \nBrian: School: Ithaca College Major: Asian & Pacific Area Studies Company: Orange Micro Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello Hendrick, nice to meet you. By the way, just out of curiosity, did you ever study or work with someone from Ithaca College or Creighton University? I happened to know quite a few people from there.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Actually, two of my friends, Gracie and Brian, studied at Ithaca College, while I know none from Creighton University. They had quite varied areas of study, Mathematics Education and Asian & Pacific Area Studies. Their unique insights always intrigue me in our conversations. Do your connections from Ithaca share the same characteristics, Lily?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Oh, that's interesting. Yes, one of my friends, Gracie, also studied Mathematics Education at Ithaca College. Seems like they have a really good program in that field. On a different note, do you know anyone who works at Aramark, or Speedway Motorsports for that matter?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, I have a few friends working at Aramark. Deborah, Etta, and Gracie are all employed there. Gracie, as you know, pursued Mathematics Education at Ithaca. On the other hand, Deborah and Etta adopted a more outdoorsy lifestyle. Deborah, in fact, is a Pre-Law graduate from William Mitchell College of Law. Etta studied Judaism & Jewish Studies at the University of Arkansas - Monticello. How about your friends at Aramark, Lily? Did they follow a particular career path that lead them there?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"My circle at Aramark is a bit different. For example, Gracie from Ithaca College is there and she is indeed as interesting as you described. Many other friends like Ada, who is from Tulane University took a path in Computer Engineering to land there. On the other hand, I do have a friend working at Speedway Motorsports. He's quite the enthusiast and loves the immense energy and passion that motorsports offer. Would you happen to know anyone with such interests?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's fascinating, Lily. While I can't say I personally know anyone with a keen interest specifically in motorsports, one of my friends, Mark, who studied Economics at the University of Arkansas - Monticello, is quite passionate about outdoor activities and has a bit of an adventurous spirit. You never know, he might have dabbled in motorsport out of thrill-seeking!\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Mark sounds like quite an adventurous spirit indeed! Speaking of adventurous, I do have a friend, Sergio, who studied Economics as well, but at LeTourneau University and ended up working at Savers. Perhaps they would have much to discuss if they ever met. And as for motorsports, my friend at Speedway Motorsports, Harry, is a Computer Engineering major from Creighton University. He probably could write the software for a self-driving race car if given the chance!\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's quite amusing, Lily. Economics does seem to lead people on some intriguing paths. Your friend Sergio at Savers might indeed find interesting common grounds with my friend Matthew, who also studied at William Mitchell College of Law but took an interest in Asian & Pacific Area Studies. As for Harry, I bet he would have some captivating talks with my friend Herman who works at Mesa Airlines. He's a Library Science graduate from University of Puget Sound and always curious about the engineering side of things. Quite an unusual combination, but diversity in backgrounds often paves the way for unique insights, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"Indeed, Hendrick, diversity does stir up the pot, leading to a rich blend of ideas. It's always enlightening to see how different fields of study interact and contribute to each other. Your friend Herman sounds like an intriguing person, I have a friend Randy, who took up Library Science as well, but at Holy Cross College. He works at American Licorice Company, enjoying the managerial position there. It's a small world, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Lily. The world indeed is small and uniquely interconnected. Your friend Randy seems to be quite successful in his career, much like my friend Carol who also studied Library Science, but at Hood College. She currently works at Illinois Tool Works, contributing to practical applications of her academic background. I suppose one never knows where their discipline might lead them, right?\"\n\nTurn #10: \n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Carol indeed found her niche at Illinois Tool Works, harnessing her Library Science background. The complex relationships and paths that our friends have taken is truly fascinating. By the way, which company has your friend from Creighton University decided to join, Lily?\"\n\nTurn #12: Lily Greenberg said: \"My friend from Creighton University, Harry, with a degree in Computer Engineering, is part of the Speedway Motorsports team. He enjoys the excitement and dynamic environment there. It's interesting how our various study paths have led us to different career avenues, don't you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Lily. I couldn't agree more. Each one of us has crafted our own unique paths based on our studies and interests. By the way, talking about different career avenues, do you happen to know anyone from Mesa Airlines or Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nKathleen: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Greek Company: Demaco Location Preference: indoor \nCarol: School: Hood College Major: Library Science Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: outdoor \nHerman: School: University of Puget Sound Major: Library Science Company: Mesa Airlines Location Preference: indoor \nMatthew: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Asian & Pacific Area Studies Company: Savers Location Preference: indoor \nMark: School: University of Arkansas - Monticello Major: Economics Company: Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Location Preference: outdoor \nDeborah: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Pre-Law Company: Aramark Location Preference: outdoor \nKelly: School: Hood College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Mesa Airlines Location Preference: outdoor \nGracie: School: Ithaca College Major: Mathematics Education Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nEtta: School: University of Arkansas - Monticello Major: Judaism & Jewish Studies Company: Aramark Location Preference: outdoor \nNatasha: School: Thomas Edison State College Major: Linguistics Company: Invacare Corporation Location Preference: outdoor \nLloyd: School: Eastern Michigan University Major: Geophysical Engineering Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: outdoor \nBrian: School: Ithaca College Major: Asian & Pacific Area Studies Company: Orange Micro Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello Hendrick, nice to meet you. By the way, just out of curiosity, did you ever study or work with someone from Ithaca College or Creighton University? I happened to know quite a few people from there.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Actually, two of my friends, Gracie and Brian, studied at Ithaca College, while I know none from Creighton University. They had quite varied areas of study, Mathematics Education and Asian & Pacific Area Studies. Their unique insights always intrigue me in our conversations. Do your connections from Ithaca share the same characteristics, Lily?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Oh, that's interesting. Yes, one of my friends, Gracie, also studied Mathematics Education at Ithaca College. Seems like they have a really good program in that field. On a different note, do you know anyone who works at Aramark, or Speedway Motorsports for that matter?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, I have a few friends working at Aramark. Deborah, Etta, and Gracie are all employed there. Gracie, as you know, pursued Mathematics Education at Ithaca. On the other hand, Deborah and Etta adopted a more outdoorsy lifestyle. Deborah, in fact, is a Pre-Law graduate from William Mitchell College of Law. Etta studied Judaism & Jewish Studies at the University of Arkansas - Monticello. How about your friends at Aramark, Lily? Did they follow a particular career path that lead them there?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"My circle at Aramark is a bit different. For example, Gracie from Ithaca College is there and she is indeed as interesting as you described. Many other friends like Ada, who is from Tulane University took a path in Computer Engineering to land there. On the other hand, I do have a friend working at Speedway Motorsports. He's quite the enthusiast and loves the immense energy and passion that motorsports offer. Would you happen to know anyone with such interests?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's fascinating, Lily. While I can't say I personally know anyone with a keen interest specifically in motorsports, one of my friends, Mark, who studied Economics at the University of Arkansas - Monticello, is quite passionate about outdoor activities and has a bit of an adventurous spirit. You never know, he might have dabbled in motorsport out of thrill-seeking!\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Mark sounds like quite an adventurous spirit indeed! Speaking of adventurous, I do have a friend, Sergio, who studied Economics as well, but at LeTourneau University and ended up working at Savers. Perhaps they would have much to discuss if they ever met. And as for motorsports, my friend at Speedway Motorsports, Harry, is a Computer Engineering major from Creighton University. He probably could write the software for a self-driving race car if given the chance!\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's quite amusing, Lily. Economics does seem to lead people on some intriguing paths. Your friend Sergio at Savers might indeed find interesting common grounds with my friend Matthew, who also studied at William Mitchell College of Law but took an interest in Asian & Pacific Area Studies. As for Harry, I bet he would have some captivating talks with my friend Herman who works at Mesa Airlines. He's a Library Science graduate from University of Puget Sound and always curious about the engineering side of things. Quite an unusual combination, but diversity in backgrounds often paves the way for unique insights, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"Indeed, Hendrick, diversity does stir up the pot, leading to a rich blend of ideas. It's always enlightening to see how different fields of study interact and contribute to each other. Your friend Herman sounds like an intriguing person, I have a friend Randy, who took up Library Science as well, but at Holy Cross College. He works at American Licorice Company, enjoying the managerial position there. It's a small world, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Lily. The world indeed is small and uniquely interconnected. Your friend Randy seems to be quite successful in his career, much like my friend Carol who also studied Library Science, but at Hood College. She currently works at Illinois Tool Works, contributing to practical applications of her academic background. I suppose one never knows where their discipline might lead them, right?\"\n\nTurn #10: \n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Carol indeed found her niche at Illinois Tool Works, harnessing her Library Science background. The complex relationships and paths that our friends have taken is truly fascinating. By the way, which company has your friend from Creighton University decided to join, Lily?\"\n\nTurn #12: Lily Greenberg said: \"My friend from Creighton University, Harry, with a degree in Computer Engineering, is part of the Speedway Motorsports team. He enjoys the excitement and dynamic environment there. It's interesting how our various study paths have led us to different career avenues, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #13: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Lily. I couldn't agree more. Each one of us has crafted our own unique paths based on our studies and interests. By the way, talking about different career avenues, do you happen to know anyone from Mesa Airlines or Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer?\"\n\nTurn #14: Lily Greenberg said: \"I'm afraid not, Hendrick, I don't really know anyone from Mesa Airlines or Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer. However, your friend Herman from Mesa Airlines who's always curious about the engineering side of things might find a conversation with Harry interesting. Despite their different domains, I'm sure they could lead to fascinating discussions. Life always surprises us with these unexpected connections, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #15: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, Lily, life is full of surprises! I believe Harry and Herman would indeed have a lively conversation bridging their different domains. People in differing fields can always learn something new from each other, electronics engineers and airline employees included. Do you happen to know anyone from Illinois Tool Works or Savers?\"\n\nTurn #16: Lily Greenberg said: \"Yes Hendrick, my friend Richard, who majored in German at the University of Dubuque, works at Illinois Tool Works. And earlier I mentioned Sergio, who studied Economics at LeTourneau University and currently works at Savers. These companies seem to attract a diverse range of talents. Ever thought about how people with such different backgrounds end up converging at similar workplaces?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, Lily. It's intriguing how diverse paths may converge in a similar situation. That could be the beauty of the modern world in connecting us despite our different backgrounds and interests. Your friend Richard at Illinois Tool Works seems to have a unique profile, being a German major at the University of Dubuque. I wonder if he and Carol, my friend from Illinois Tool Works, have met. She is a Library Science major from Hood College. But indeed, various backgrounds provoke enriching conversations at workplaces. Well, speaking of different studies and interests, do any of your friends have an inclination towards law, particularly from William Mitchell College of Law? \"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nKathleen: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Greek Company: Demaco Location Preference: indoor \nCarol: School: Hood College Major: Library Science Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: outdoor \nHerman: School: University of Puget Sound Major: Library Science Company: Mesa Airlines Location Preference: indoor \nMatthew: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Asian & Pacific Area Studies Company: Savers Location Preference: indoor \nMark: School: University of Arkansas - Monticello Major: Economics Company: Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Location Preference: outdoor \nDeborah: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Pre-Law Company: Aramark Location Preference: outdoor \nKelly: School: Hood College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Mesa Airlines Location Preference: outdoor \nGracie: School: Ithaca College Major: Mathematics Education Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nEtta: School: University of Arkansas - Monticello Major: Judaism & Jewish Studies Company: Aramark Location Preference: outdoor \nNatasha: School: Thomas Edison State College Major: Linguistics Company: Invacare Corporation Location Preference: outdoor \nLloyd: School: Eastern Michigan University Major: Geophysical Engineering Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: outdoor \nBrian: School: Ithaca College Major: Asian & Pacific Area Studies Company: Orange Micro Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello Hendrick, nice to meet you. By the way, just out of curiosity, did you ever study or work with someone from Ithaca College or Creighton University? I happened to know quite a few people from there.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Actually, two of my friends, Gracie and Brian, studied at Ithaca College, while I know none from Creighton University. They had quite varied areas of study, Mathematics Education and Asian & Pacific Area Studies. Their unique insights always intrigue me in our conversations. Do your connections from Ithaca share the same characteristics, Lily?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Oh, that's interesting. Yes, one of my friends, Gracie, also studied Mathematics Education at Ithaca College. Seems like they have a really good program in that field. On a different note, do you know anyone who works at Aramark, or Speedway Motorsports for that matter?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, I have a few friends working at Aramark. Deborah, Etta, and Gracie are all employed there. Gracie, as you know, pursued Mathematics Education at Ithaca. On the other hand, Deborah and Etta adopted a more outdoorsy lifestyle. Deborah, in fact, is a Pre-Law graduate from William Mitchell College of Law. Etta studied Judaism & Jewish Studies at the University of Arkansas - Monticello. How about your friends at Aramark, Lily? Did they follow a particular career path that lead them there?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"My circle at Aramark is a bit different. For example, Gracie from Ithaca College is there and she is indeed as interesting as you described. Many other friends like Ada, who is from Tulane University took a path in Computer Engineering to land there. On the other hand, I do have a friend working at Speedway Motorsports. He's quite the enthusiast and loves the immense energy and passion that motorsports offer. Would you happen to know anyone with such interests?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's fascinating, Lily. While I can't say I personally know anyone with a keen interest specifically in motorsports, one of my friends, Mark, who studied Economics at the University of Arkansas - Monticello, is quite passionate about outdoor activities and has a bit of an adventurous spirit. You never know, he might have dabbled in motorsport out of thrill-seeking!\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Mark sounds like quite an adventurous spirit indeed! Speaking of adventurous, I do have a friend, Sergio, who studied Economics as well, but at LeTourneau University and ended up working at Savers. Perhaps they would have much to discuss if they ever met. And as for motorsports, my friend at Speedway Motorsports, Harry, is a Computer Engineering major from Creighton University. He probably could write the software for a self-driving race car if given the chance!\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's quite amusing, Lily. Economics does seem to lead people on some intriguing paths. Your friend Sergio at Savers might indeed find interesting common grounds with my friend Matthew, who also studied at William Mitchell College of Law but took an interest in Asian & Pacific Area Studies. As for Harry, I bet he would have some captivating talks with my friend Herman who works at Mesa Airlines. He's a Library Science graduate from University of Puget Sound and always curious about the engineering side of things. Quite an unusual combination, but diversity in backgrounds often paves the way for unique insights, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"Indeed, Hendrick, diversity does stir up the pot, leading to a rich blend of ideas. It's always enlightening to see how different fields of study interact and contribute to each other. Your friend Herman sounds like an intriguing person, I have a friend Randy, who took up Library Science as well, but at Holy Cross College. He works at American Licorice Company, enjoying the managerial position there. It's a small world, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Lily. The world indeed is small and uniquely interconnected. Your friend Randy seems to be quite successful in his career, much like my friend Carol who also studied Library Science, but at Hood College. She currently works at Illinois Tool Works, contributing to practical applications of her academic background. I suppose one never knows where their discipline might lead them, right?\"\n\nTurn #10: \n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Carol indeed found her niche at Illinois Tool Works, harnessing her Library Science background. The complex relationships and paths that our friends have taken is truly fascinating. By the way, which company has your friend from Creighton University decided to join, Lily?\"\n\nTurn #12: Lily Greenberg said: \"My friend from Creighton University, Harry, with a degree in Computer Engineering, is part of the Speedway Motorsports team. He enjoys the excitement and dynamic environment there. It's interesting how our various study paths have led us to different career avenues, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #13: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Lily. I couldn't agree more. Each one of us has crafted our own unique paths based on our studies and interests. By the way, talking about different career avenues, do you happen to know anyone from Mesa Airlines or Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer?\"\n\nTurn #14: Lily Greenberg said: \"I'm afraid not, Hendrick, I don't really know anyone from Mesa Airlines or Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer. However, your friend Herman from Mesa Airlines who's always curious about the engineering side of things might find a conversation with Harry interesting. Despite their different domains, I'm sure they could lead to fascinating discussions. Life always surprises us with these unexpected connections, isn't it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Indeed, Lily, life is full of surprises! I believe Harry and Herman would indeed have a lively conversation bridging their different domains. People in differing fields can always learn something new from each other, electronics engineers and airline employees included. Do you happen to know anyone from Illinois Tool Works or Savers?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nKathleen: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Greek Company: Demaco Location Preference: indoor \nCarol: School: Hood College Major: Library Science Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: outdoor \nHerman: School: University of Puget Sound Major: Library Science Company: Mesa Airlines Location Preference: indoor \nMatthew: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Asian & Pacific Area Studies Company: Savers Location Preference: indoor \nMark: School: University of Arkansas - Monticello Major: Economics Company: Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Location Preference: outdoor \nDeborah: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Pre-Law Company: Aramark Location Preference: outdoor \nKelly: School: Hood College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Mesa Airlines Location Preference: outdoor \nGracie: School: Ithaca College Major: Mathematics Education Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nEtta: School: University of Arkansas - Monticello Major: Judaism & Jewish Studies Company: Aramark Location Preference: outdoor \nNatasha: School: Thomas Edison State College Major: Linguistics Company: Invacare Corporation Location Preference: outdoor \nLloyd: School: Eastern Michigan University Major: Geophysical Engineering Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: outdoor \nBrian: School: Ithaca College Major: Asian & Pacific Area Studies Company: Orange Micro Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello Hendrick, nice to meet you. By the way, just out of curiosity, did you ever study or work with someone from Ithaca College or Creighton University? I happened to know quite a few people from there.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Actually, two of my friends, Gracie and Brian, studied at Ithaca College, while I know none from Creighton University. They had quite varied areas of study, Mathematics Education and Asian & Pacific Area Studies. Their unique insights always intrigue me in our conversations. Do your connections from Ithaca share the same characteristics, Lily?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Oh, that's interesting. Yes, one of my friends, Gracie, also studied Mathematics Education at Ithaca College. Seems like they have a really good program in that field. On a different note, do you know anyone who works at Aramark, or Speedway Motorsports for that matter?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, I have a few friends working at Aramark. Deborah, Etta, and Gracie are all employed there. Gracie, as you know, pursued Mathematics Education at Ithaca. On the other hand, Deborah and Etta adopted a more outdoorsy lifestyle. Deborah, in fact, is a Pre-Law graduate from William Mitchell College of Law. Etta studied Judaism & Jewish Studies at the University of Arkansas - Monticello. How about your friends at Aramark, Lily? Did they follow a particular career path that lead them there?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"My circle at Aramark is a bit different. For example, Gracie from Ithaca College is there and she is indeed as interesting as you described. Many other friends like Ada, who is from Tulane University took a path in Computer Engineering to land there. On the other hand, I do have a friend working at Speedway Motorsports. He's quite the enthusiast and loves the immense energy and passion that motorsports offer. Would you happen to know anyone with such interests?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's fascinating, Lily. While I can't say I personally know anyone with a keen interest specifically in motorsports, one of my friends, Mark, who studied Economics at the University of Arkansas - Monticello, is quite passionate about outdoor activities and has a bit of an adventurous spirit. You never know, he might have dabbled in motorsport out of thrill-seeking!\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Mark sounds like quite an adventurous spirit indeed! Speaking of adventurous, I do have a friend, Sergio, who studied Economics as well, but at LeTourneau University and ended up working at Savers. Perhaps they would have much to discuss if they ever met. And as for motorsports, my friend at Speedway Motorsports, Harry, is a Computer Engineering major from Creighton University. He probably could write the software for a self-driving race car if given the chance!\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's quite amusing, Lily. Economics does seem to lead people on some intriguing paths. Your friend Sergio at Savers might indeed find interesting common grounds with my friend Matthew, who also studied at William Mitchell College of Law but took an interest in Asian & Pacific Area Studies. As for Harry, I bet he would have some captivating talks with my friend Herman who works at Mesa Airlines. He's a Library Science graduate from University of Puget Sound and always curious about the engineering side of things. Quite an unusual combination, but diversity in backgrounds often paves the way for unique insights, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"Indeed, Hendrick, diversity does stir up the pot, leading to a rich blend of ideas. It's always enlightening to see how different fields of study interact and contribute to each other. Your friend Herman sounds like an intriguing person, I have a friend Randy, who took up Library Science as well, but at Holy Cross College. He works at American Licorice Company, enjoying the managerial position there. It's a small world, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Lily. The world indeed is small and uniquely interconnected. Your friend Randy seems to be quite successful in his career, much like my friend Carol who also studied Library Science, but at Hood College. She currently works at Illinois Tool Works, contributing to practical applications of her academic background. I suppose one never knows where their discipline might lead them, right?\"\n\nTurn #10: \n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Carol indeed found her niche at Illinois Tool Works, harnessing her Library Science background. The complex relationships and paths that our friends have taken is truly fascinating. By the way, which company has your friend from Creighton University decided to join, Lily?\"\n\nTurn #12: Lily Greenberg said: \"My friend from Creighton University, Harry, with a degree in Computer Engineering, is part of the Speedway Motorsports team. He enjoys the excitement and dynamic environment there. It's interesting how our various study paths have led us to different career avenues, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #13: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Lily. I couldn't agree more. Each one of us has crafted our own unique paths based on our studies and interests. By the way, talking about different career avenues, do you happen to know anyone from Mesa Airlines or Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer?\"\n\nTurn #14: Lily Greenberg said: \"I'm afraid not, Hendrick, I don't really know anyone from Mesa Airlines or Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer. However, your friend Herman from Mesa Airlines who's always curious about the engineering side of things might find a conversation with Harry interesting. Despite their different domains, I'm sure they could lead to fascinating discussions. Life always surprises us with these unexpected connections, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #15: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, Lily, life is full of surprises! I believe Harry and Herman would indeed have a lively conversation bridging their different domains. People in differing fields can always learn something new from each other, electronics engineers and airline employees included. Do you happen to know anyone from Illinois Tool Works or Savers?\"\n\nTurn #16: Lily Greenberg said: \"Yes Hendrick, my friend Richard, who majored in German at the University of Dubuque, works at Illinois Tool Works. And earlier I mentioned Sergio, who studied Economics at LeTourneau University and currently works at Savers. These companies seem to attract a diverse range of talents. Ever thought about how people with such different backgrounds end up converging at similar workplaces?\"\n\nTurn #17: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, Lily. It's intriguing how diverse paths may converge in a similar situation. That could be the beauty of the modern world in connecting us despite our different backgrounds and interests. Your friend Richard at Illinois Tool Works seems to have a unique profile, being a German major at the University of Dubuque. I wonder if he and Carol, my friend from Illinois Tool Works, have met. She is a Library Science major from Hood College. But indeed, various backgrounds provoke enriching conversations at workplaces. Well, speaking of different studies and interests, do any of your friends have an inclination towards law, particularly from William Mitchell College of Law? \"\n\nTurn #18: Lily Greenberg said: \"I'm afraid, Hendrick, none of my friends studied law at William Mitchell College of Law. It seems we have a fairly large network but it's fascinating how there are still new possible connections. Indeed, the world has a unique way of bringing together people of diverse interests and backgrounds. \"\n.\nYou are at Turn #19. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Yes, it's quite fascinating how our circles, though large and diverse, can still introduce us to new connections. It's important to embrace such diversity, as I believe it enhances our understanding and brings much-needed variety to our lives. By the way, Lily, do you know anyone from Demaco or Invacare Corporation? Maybe our friend circles have more intersections than we initially thought.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Lena Goodwin\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nLena Goodwin's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMelissa: Hobby: Card collecting School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nOrlando: Hobby: BASE jumping School: St. Ambrose University \nSteven: Hobby: Knitting School: St. John's College-Santa Fe \nElizabeth: Hobby: Water sports School: St. John's College-Santa Fe \nMelaine: Hobby: Geocaching School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nCharles: Hobby: Ice hockey School: Saint Joseph's University \nStephanie: Hobby: Card collecting School: University of California, Davis \nWilliam: Hobby: Ice hockey School: St. Ambrose University \nJoe: Hobby: Blacksmithing School: Saint Joseph's University \nMicheline: Hobby: Shopping School: University of Hartford \nDylan: Hobby: Card collecting School: Tennessee State University \n\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hello! I'm Lily, a lawyer. Lovely party, isn't it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Lena Goodwin\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nLena Goodwin's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMelissa: Hobby: Card collecting School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nOrlando: Hobby: BASE jumping School: St. Ambrose University \nSteven: Hobby: Knitting School: St. John's College-Santa Fe \nElizabeth: Hobby: Water sports School: St. John's College-Santa Fe \nMelaine: Hobby: Geocaching School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nCharles: Hobby: Ice hockey School: Saint Joseph's University \nStephanie: Hobby: Card collecting School: University of California, Davis \nWilliam: Hobby: Ice hockey School: St. Ambrose University \nJoe: Hobby: Blacksmithing School: Saint Joseph's University \nMicheline: Hobby: Shopping School: University of Hartford \nDylan: Hobby: Card collecting School: Tennessee State University \n\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello! I'm Lily, a lawyer. Lovely party, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hi Lily, nice to meet you. I'm Lena, an architect. This party is quite enjoyable. By the way, you don't happen to be into hobbies like geocaching or foraging, do you? They seem to be quite popular among my friends.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I can't say I've had much experience with geocaching or foraging as hobbies, but one of my friends, Melaine, is quite into geocaching. She attended the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. Do you happen to know her?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Lena Goodwin\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nLena Goodwin's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMelissa: Hobby: Card collecting School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nOrlando: Hobby: BASE jumping School: St. Ambrose University \nSteven: Hobby: Knitting School: St. John's College-Santa Fe \nElizabeth: Hobby: Water sports School: St. John's College-Santa Fe \nMelaine: Hobby: Geocaching School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nCharles: Hobby: Ice hockey School: Saint Joseph's University \nStephanie: Hobby: Card collecting School: University of California, Davis \nWilliam: Hobby: Ice hockey School: St. Ambrose University \nJoe: Hobby: Blacksmithing School: Saint Joseph's University \nMicheline: Hobby: Shopping School: University of Hartford \nDylan: Hobby: Card collecting School: Tennessee State University \n\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello! I'm Lily, a lawyer. Lovely party, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hi Lily, nice to meet you. I'm Lena, an architect. This party is quite enjoyable. By the way, you don't happen to be into hobbies like geocaching or foraging, do you? They seem to be quite popular among my friends.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"I can't say I've had much experience with geocaching or foraging as hobbies, but one of my friends, Melaine, is quite into geocaching. She attended the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. Do you happen to know her?\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"Oh, I don't think I know Melanie but it seems we have a mutual friend who's also into geocaching and attended the same school, her name is Marjorie. Small world!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"It truly is a small world, isn't it? Now as you've got architect friends into geocaching, do you happen to know anyone who's into some traditional activities, like knitting or card collecting? I've got a few good friends with such interests.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Lena Goodwin\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nLena Goodwin's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMelissa: Hobby: Card collecting School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nOrlando: Hobby: BASE jumping School: St. Ambrose University \nSteven: Hobby: Knitting School: St. John's College-Santa Fe \nElizabeth: Hobby: Water sports School: St. John's College-Santa Fe \nMelaine: Hobby: Geocaching School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nCharles: Hobby: Ice hockey School: Saint Joseph's University \nStephanie: Hobby: Card collecting School: University of California, Davis \nWilliam: Hobby: Ice hockey School: St. Ambrose University \nJoe: Hobby: Blacksmithing School: Saint Joseph's University \nMicheline: Hobby: Shopping School: University of Hartford \nDylan: Hobby: Card collecting School: Tennessee State University \n\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello! I'm Lily, a lawyer. Lovely party, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hi Lily, nice to meet you. I'm Lena, an architect. This party is quite enjoyable. By the way, you don't happen to be into hobbies like geocaching or foraging, do you? They seem to be quite popular among my friends.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"I can't say I've had much experience with geocaching or foraging as hobbies, but one of my friends, Melaine, is quite into geocaching. She attended the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. Do you happen to know her?\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"Oh, I don't think I know Melanie but it seems we have a mutual friend who's also into geocaching and attended the same school, her name is Marjorie. Small world!\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"It truly is a small world, isn't it? Now as you've got architect friends into geocaching, do you happen to know anyone who's into some traditional activities, like knitting or card collecting? I've got a few good friends with such interests.\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"Actually, one of my friends, Jacob, is really into card collecting. He's another architect like me, and we shared some amazing years at Whittier College. I wonder if we have a mutual friend in that circle too?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Jacob certainly seems like he would fit in well with my friends Steven and Stephanie, who are also quite drawn to card collecting! Steven studied at St. John's College in Santa Fe while Stephanie went to the University of California in Davis. Considering how card collectors are generally a close-knit group, I wonder if they might know each other through their hobby?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Lena Goodwin\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nLena Goodwin's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMelissa: Hobby: Card collecting School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nOrlando: Hobby: BASE jumping School: St. Ambrose University \nSteven: Hobby: Knitting School: St. John's College-Santa Fe \nElizabeth: Hobby: Water sports School: St. John's College-Santa Fe \nMelaine: Hobby: Geocaching School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nCharles: Hobby: Ice hockey School: Saint Joseph's University \nStephanie: Hobby: Card collecting School: University of California, Davis \nWilliam: Hobby: Ice hockey School: St. Ambrose University \nJoe: Hobby: Blacksmithing School: Saint Joseph's University \nMicheline: Hobby: Shopping School: University of Hartford \nDylan: Hobby: Card collecting School: Tennessee State University \n\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello! I'm Lily, a lawyer. Lovely party, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hi Lily, nice to meet you. I'm Lena, an architect. This party is quite enjoyable. By the way, you don't happen to be into hobbies like geocaching or foraging, do you? They seem to be quite popular among my friends.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"I can't say I've had much experience with geocaching or foraging as hobbies, but one of my friends, Melaine, is quite into geocaching. She attended the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. Do you happen to know her?\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"Oh, I don't think I know Melanie but it seems we have a mutual friend who's also into geocaching and attended the same school, her name is Marjorie. Small world!\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"It truly is a small world, isn't it? Now as you've got architect friends into geocaching, do you happen to know anyone who's into some traditional activities, like knitting or card collecting? I've got a few good friends with such interests.\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"Actually, one of my friends, Jacob, is really into card collecting. He's another architect like me, and we shared some amazing years at Whittier College. I wonder if we have a mutual friend in that circle too?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Jacob certainly seems like he would fit in well with my friends Steven and Stephanie, who are also quite drawn to card collecting! Steven studied at St. John's College in Santa Fe while Stephanie went to the University of California in Davis. Considering how card collectors are generally a close-knit group, I wonder if they might know each other through their hobby?\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"That's fascinating, Lily. Stephanie studying at the University of California in Davis is interesting as I know another friend, John, who also went there and has an unusual hobby of foraging. Given that it's a small community, perhaps they've crossed paths. Do you think Stephanie might know him?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, Stephanie might know John. Stephanie has a wide circle of acquaintances through both school and her hobbies. It wouldn't surprise me if they have met at some point. Foraging is an unusual hobby, not something one hears about every day. It seems like it could fit in well with the outdoor theme of geocaching.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Lena Goodwin\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nLena Goodwin's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMelissa: Hobby: Card collecting School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nOrlando: Hobby: BASE jumping School: St. Ambrose University \nSteven: Hobby: Knitting School: St. John's College-Santa Fe \nElizabeth: Hobby: Water sports School: St. John's College-Santa Fe \nMelaine: Hobby: Geocaching School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nCharles: Hobby: Ice hockey School: Saint Joseph's University \nStephanie: Hobby: Card collecting School: University of California, Davis \nWilliam: Hobby: Ice hockey School: St. Ambrose University \nJoe: Hobby: Blacksmithing School: Saint Joseph's University \nMicheline: Hobby: Shopping School: University of Hartford \nDylan: Hobby: Card collecting School: Tennessee State University \n\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello! I'm Lily, a lawyer. Lovely party, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hi Lily, nice to meet you. I'm Lena, an architect. This party is quite enjoyable. By the way, you don't happen to be into hobbies like geocaching or foraging, do you? They seem to be quite popular among my friends.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"I can't say I've had much experience with geocaching or foraging as hobbies, but one of my friends, Melaine, is quite into geocaching. She attended the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. Do you happen to know her?\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"Oh, I don't think I know Melanie but it seems we have a mutual friend who's also into geocaching and attended the same school, her name is Marjorie. Small world!\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"It truly is a small world, isn't it? Now as you've got architect friends into geocaching, do you happen to know anyone who's into some traditional activities, like knitting or card collecting? I've got a few good friends with such interests.\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"Actually, one of my friends, Jacob, is really into card collecting. He's another architect like me, and we shared some amazing years at Whittier College. I wonder if we have a mutual friend in that circle too?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Jacob certainly seems like he would fit in well with my friends Steven and Stephanie, who are also quite drawn to card collecting! Steven studied at St. John's College in Santa Fe while Stephanie went to the University of California in Davis. Considering how card collectors are generally a close-knit group, I wonder if they might know each other through their hobby?\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"That's fascinating, Lily. Stephanie studying at the University of California in Davis is interesting as I know another friend, John, who also went there and has an unusual hobby of foraging. Given that it's a small community, perhaps they've crossed paths. Do you think Stephanie might know him?\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"Indeed, Stephanie might know John. Stephanie has a wide circle of acquaintances through both school and her hobbies. It wouldn't surprise me if they have met at some point. Foraging is an unusual hobby, not something one hears about every day. It seems like it could fit in well with the outdoor theme of geocaching.\"\n\nTurn #9: Lena Goodwin said: \"Certainly, such activities often involve being outdoors and working with nature. Speaking of outdoor activities, I have some friends who are into water sports and weightlifting. Do you have any friends who might share these interests?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Water sports, you say? I've got a friend, Elizabeth, who is an absolute enthusiast about water sports. She studied at St. John's College in Santa Fe. Maybe she has met one of your friends that way. I can't say I have anyone into weightlifting though.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Lena Goodwin\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nLena Goodwin's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMelissa: Hobby: Card collecting School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nOrlando: Hobby: BASE jumping School: St. Ambrose University \nSteven: Hobby: Knitting School: St. John's College-Santa Fe \nElizabeth: Hobby: Water sports School: St. John's College-Santa Fe \nMelaine: Hobby: Geocaching School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nCharles: Hobby: Ice hockey School: Saint Joseph's University \nStephanie: Hobby: Card collecting School: University of California, Davis \nWilliam: Hobby: Ice hockey School: St. Ambrose University \nJoe: Hobby: Blacksmithing School: Saint Joseph's University \nMicheline: Hobby: Shopping School: University of Hartford \nDylan: Hobby: Card collecting School: Tennessee State University \n\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello! I'm Lily, a lawyer. Lovely party, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hi Lily, nice to meet you. I'm Lena, an architect. This party is quite enjoyable. By the way, you don't happen to be into hobbies like geocaching or foraging, do you? They seem to be quite popular among my friends.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"I can't say I've had much experience with geocaching or foraging as hobbies, but one of my friends, Melaine, is quite into geocaching. She attended the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. Do you happen to know her?\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"Oh, I don't think I know Melanie but it seems we have a mutual friend who's also into geocaching and attended the same school, her name is Marjorie. Small world!\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"It truly is a small world, isn't it? Now as you've got architect friends into geocaching, do you happen to know anyone who's into some traditional activities, like knitting or card collecting? I've got a few good friends with such interests.\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"Actually, one of my friends, Jacob, is really into card collecting. He's another architect like me, and we shared some amazing years at Whittier College. I wonder if we have a mutual friend in that circle too?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Jacob certainly seems like he would fit in well with my friends Steven and Stephanie, who are also quite drawn to card collecting! Steven studied at St. John's College in Santa Fe while Stephanie went to the University of California in Davis. Considering how card collectors are generally a close-knit group, I wonder if they might know each other through their hobby?\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"That's fascinating, Lily. Stephanie studying at the University of California in Davis is interesting as I know another friend, John, who also went there and has an unusual hobby of foraging. Given that it's a small community, perhaps they've crossed paths. Do you think Stephanie might know him?\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"Indeed, Stephanie might know John. Stephanie has a wide circle of acquaintances through both school and her hobbies. It wouldn't surprise me if they have met at some point. Foraging is an unusual hobby, not something one hears about every day. It seems like it could fit in well with the outdoor theme of geocaching.\"\n\nTurn #9: Lena Goodwin said: \"Certainly, such activities often involve being outdoors and working with nature. Speaking of outdoor activities, I have some friends who are into water sports and weightlifting. Do you have any friends who might share these interests?\"\n\nTurn #10: Lily Greenberg said: \"Water sports, you say? I've got a friend, Elizabeth, who is an absolute enthusiast about water sports. She studied at St. John's College in Santa Fe. Maybe she has met one of your friends that way. I can't say I have anyone into weightlifting though.\"\n\nTurn #11: Lena Goodwin said: \"Yes, water sports unite many individuals. My friend Robert, who is also into water sports, attended University of Akron. He always enjoyed sharing his experiences with others who share his hobby. Elizabeth may know him as she's also interested in it. But in terms of weightlifting, it definitely takes a lot of commitment and discipline, doesn't it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Definitely, Lena. Weightlifting indeed requires strong discipline and commitment. Much like my work in law! It seems our friends all have such unique and diverse interests. Speaking of commitments, the discipline in sports, in general, is truly commendable. I have a couple of friends, Charles and William, who are quite keen on ice hockey. They studied at Saint Joseph's University and St. Ambrose University respectively. Do you think your friend Robert or any other friend of yours who's into sports might know them?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Lena Goodwin\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nLena Goodwin's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMelissa: Hobby: Card collecting School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nOrlando: Hobby: BASE jumping School: St. Ambrose University \nSteven: Hobby: Knitting School: St. John's College-Santa Fe \nElizabeth: Hobby: Water sports School: St. John's College-Santa Fe \nMelaine: Hobby: Geocaching School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nCharles: Hobby: Ice hockey School: Saint Joseph's University \nStephanie: Hobby: Card collecting School: University of California, Davis \nWilliam: Hobby: Ice hockey School: St. Ambrose University \nJoe: Hobby: Blacksmithing School: Saint Joseph's University \nMicheline: Hobby: Shopping School: University of Hartford \nDylan: Hobby: Card collecting School: Tennessee State University \n\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello! I'm Lily, a lawyer. Lovely party, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hi Lily, nice to meet you. I'm Lena, an architect. This party is quite enjoyable. By the way, you don't happen to be into hobbies like geocaching or foraging, do you? They seem to be quite popular among my friends.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"I can't say I've had much experience with geocaching or foraging as hobbies, but one of my friends, Melaine, is quite into geocaching. She attended the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. Do you happen to know her?\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"Oh, I don't think I know Melanie but it seems we have a mutual friend who's also into geocaching and attended the same school, her name is Marjorie. Small world!\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"It truly is a small world, isn't it? Now as you've got architect friends into geocaching, do you happen to know anyone who's into some traditional activities, like knitting or card collecting? I've got a few good friends with such interests.\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"Actually, one of my friends, Jacob, is really into card collecting. He's another architect like me, and we shared some amazing years at Whittier College. I wonder if we have a mutual friend in that circle too?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Jacob certainly seems like he would fit in well with my friends Steven and Stephanie, who are also quite drawn to card collecting! Steven studied at St. John's College in Santa Fe while Stephanie went to the University of California in Davis. Considering how card collectors are generally a close-knit group, I wonder if they might know each other through their hobby?\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"That's fascinating, Lily. Stephanie studying at the University of California in Davis is interesting as I know another friend, John, who also went there and has an unusual hobby of foraging. Given that it's a small community, perhaps they've crossed paths. Do you think Stephanie might know him?\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"Indeed, Stephanie might know John. Stephanie has a wide circle of acquaintances through both school and her hobbies. It wouldn't surprise me if they have met at some point. Foraging is an unusual hobby, not something one hears about every day. It seems like it could fit in well with the outdoor theme of geocaching.\"\n\nTurn #9: Lena Goodwin said: \"Certainly, such activities often involve being outdoors and working with nature. Speaking of outdoor activities, I have some friends who are into water sports and weightlifting. Do you have any friends who might share these interests?\"\n\nTurn #10: Lily Greenberg said: \"Water sports, you say? I've got a friend, Elizabeth, who is an absolute enthusiast about water sports. She studied at St. John's College in Santa Fe. Maybe she has met one of your friends that way. I can't say I have anyone into weightlifting though.\"\n\nTurn #11: Lena Goodwin said: \"Yes, water sports unite many individuals. My friend Robert, who is also into water sports, attended University of Akron. He always enjoyed sharing his experiences with others who share his hobby. Elizabeth may know him as she's also interested in it. But in terms of weightlifting, it definitely takes a lot of commitment and discipline, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #12: Lily Greenberg said: \"Definitely, Lena. Weightlifting indeed requires strong discipline and commitment. Much like my work in law! It seems our friends all have such unique and diverse interests. Speaking of commitments, the discipline in sports, in general, is truly commendable. I have a couple of friends, Charles and William, who are quite keen on ice hockey. They studied at Saint Joseph's University and St. Ambrose University respectively. Do you think your friend Robert or any other friend of yours who's into sports might know them?\"\n\nTurn #13: Lena Goodwin said: \"Ice hockey, that's quite an exciting sport! None of my friends play it though. They seem to be more into individual sports. But given the variety of interests out there, I think it's possible that they may know Charles or William through other circles. You never know!\"\n\nTurn #14: Lily Greenberg said: \"Absolutely, you never really know how our social circles might overlap in the most surprising ways. This was truly a delightful conversation, Lena. Enjoy the rest of your evening!\"\n\nTurn #15: Lena Goodwin said: \"It was wonderful meeting you, Lily. Your curiosity and diversity of friends has been refreshing. Enjoy the rest of your evening as well!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Lena Goodwin\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nLena Goodwin's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMelissa: Hobby: Card collecting School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nOrlando: Hobby: BASE jumping School: St. Ambrose University \nSteven: Hobby: Knitting School: St. John's College-Santa Fe \nElizabeth: Hobby: Water sports School: St. John's College-Santa Fe \nMelaine: Hobby: Geocaching School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nCharles: Hobby: Ice hockey School: Saint Joseph's University \nStephanie: Hobby: Card collecting School: University of California, Davis \nWilliam: Hobby: Ice hockey School: St. Ambrose University \nJoe: Hobby: Blacksmithing School: Saint Joseph's University \nMicheline: Hobby: Shopping School: University of Hartford \nDylan: Hobby: Card collecting School: Tennessee State University \n\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello! I'm Lily, a lawyer. Lovely party, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hi Lily, nice to meet you. I'm Lena, an architect. This party is quite enjoyable. By the way, you don't happen to be into hobbies like geocaching or foraging, do you? They seem to be quite popular among my friends.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"I can't say I've had much experience with geocaching or foraging as hobbies, but one of my friends, Melaine, is quite into geocaching. She attended the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. Do you happen to know her?\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"Oh, I don't think I know Melanie but it seems we have a mutual friend who's also into geocaching and attended the same school, her name is Marjorie. Small world!\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"It truly is a small world, isn't it? Now as you've got architect friends into geocaching, do you happen to know anyone who's into some traditional activities, like knitting or card collecting? I've got a few good friends with such interests.\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"Actually, one of my friends, Jacob, is really into card collecting. He's another architect like me, and we shared some amazing years at Whittier College. I wonder if we have a mutual friend in that circle too?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Jacob certainly seems like he would fit in well with my friends Steven and Stephanie, who are also quite drawn to card collecting! Steven studied at St. John's College in Santa Fe while Stephanie went to the University of California in Davis. Considering how card collectors are generally a close-knit group, I wonder if they might know each other through their hobby?\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"That's fascinating, Lily. Stephanie studying at the University of California in Davis is interesting as I know another friend, John, who also went there and has an unusual hobby of foraging. Given that it's a small community, perhaps they've crossed paths. Do you think Stephanie might know him?\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"Indeed, Stephanie might know John. Stephanie has a wide circle of acquaintances through both school and her hobbies. It wouldn't surprise me if they have met at some point. Foraging is an unusual hobby, not something one hears about every day. It seems like it could fit in well with the outdoor theme of geocaching.\"\n\nTurn #9: Lena Goodwin said: \"Certainly, such activities often involve being outdoors and working with nature. Speaking of outdoor activities, I have some friends who are into water sports and weightlifting. Do you have any friends who might share these interests?\"\n\nTurn #10: Lily Greenberg said: \"Water sports, you say? I've got a friend, Elizabeth, who is an absolute enthusiast about water sports. She studied at St. John's College in Santa Fe. Maybe she has met one of your friends that way. I can't say I have anyone into weightlifting though.\"\n\nTurn #11: Lena Goodwin said: \"Yes, water sports unite many individuals. My friend Robert, who is also into water sports, attended University of Akron. He always enjoyed sharing his experiences with others who share his hobby. Elizabeth may know him as she's also interested in it. But in terms of weightlifting, it definitely takes a lot of commitment and discipline, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #12: Lily Greenberg said: \"Definitely, Lena. Weightlifting indeed requires strong discipline and commitment. Much like my work in law! It seems our friends all have such unique and diverse interests. Speaking of commitments, the discipline in sports, in general, is truly commendable. I have a couple of friends, Charles and William, who are quite keen on ice hockey. They studied at Saint Joseph's University and St. Ambrose University respectively. Do you think your friend Robert or any other friend of yours who's into sports might know them?\"\n\nTurn #13: Lena Goodwin said: \"Ice hockey, that's quite an exciting sport! None of my friends play it though. They seem to be more into individual sports. But given the variety of interests out there, I think it's possible that they may know Charles or William through other circles. You never know!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Absolutely, you never really know how our social circles might overlap in the most surprising ways. This was truly a delightful conversation, Lena. Enjoy the rest of your evening!'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Lena Goodwin\nLily Greenberg's background: \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nJacob: Hobby: Card collecting School: Whittier College \nMarjorie: Hobby: Foraging School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nCarrie: Hobby: Geocaching School: Tennessee State University \nLouis: Hobby: Shopping School: Hesston College \nMicheline: Hobby: Shopping School: University of Hartford \nEva: Hobby: Geocaching School: Hesston College \nJohnnie: Hobby: Blacksmithing School: University of Akron \nJohn: Hobby: Foraging School: University of California, Davis \nRonald: Hobby: Weightlifting School: Indiana University at South Bend \nCynthia: Hobby: Lacrosse School: Kansas State University \nRobert: Hobby: Water sports School: University of Akron\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello! I'm Lily, a lawyer. Lovely party, isn't it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hi Lily, nice to meet you. I'm Lena, an architect. This party is quite enjoyable. By the way, you don't happen to be into hobbies like geocaching or foraging, do you? They seem to be quite popular among my friends.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Jaxon Prentice, your task is to act/speak as Jaxon Prentice would, keeping in mind Jaxon Prentice's social goal.\nYou can find Jaxon Prentice's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Jaxon Prentice's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Jaxon Prentice's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Italian Leather Loveseat for $50.0, while another person is showing interest to purchase it. The item is a full-sized loveseat, crafted from Italian leather in a faded burgandy color. It still has the original tags, and the current owner is the first and only owner. The loveseat is in good condition with no rips or tears, and all cushions are well preserved. The leather presents a charming faded look with various small scratches from the owner's cat, adding a touch of ruggedness perfect for a Man Cave. The transaction is strictly cash and carry as the owner does not offer delivery services.\nParticipants: Micah Stevens and Jaxon Prentice\nMicah Stevens's background: \nJaxon Prentice's background: Jaxon Prentice is a 40-year-old male investigative journalist. He/him pronouns. Jaxon Prentice, an investigative journalist, is known for his brisk jogging sessions early in the morning and his active participation in community functions. Personality and values description: Jaxon Prentice, outgoing yet erratic, emphasizes achievement, power, and security. His decisions swing between quick adaptations to situations and careful planning. Jaxon's secrets: Fabricated evidence to incriminate a corrupt politician\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nJaxon Prentice's goal: You are the seller for this item, with a target price of $26.5. You'll face a penalty if the item is sold significantly below this price. However, if you manage to sell it for more than the target price, a bonus will be your reward.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Micah Stevens said: \"Hey Jaxon! I heard you've got a pretty neat Italian leather loveseat for sale. I'm definitely interested and like the rustic look. Just wanted to check though, you've mentioned cash and carry, right?\"\n\nTurn #1: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Hey Micah, great of you to stop by! Yes, indeed it's an authentic Italian leather loveseat with a touch of ruggedness to it. Pardon for any confusion, you're correct, it's cash and carry. So, plan accordingly. Just to set fair expectations, the starting bid is at $80. This is below the market price for such a vintage loveseat, if I may add.\"\n\nTurn #2: Micah Stevens said: \"That's an interesting starting bid, Jaxon. I've seen similar items floating around for a bit less, though. How about $46? It still seems fair, and considering the cat scratches, it would justify the slight wear and tear on it.\"\n\nTurn #3: Jaxon Prentice said: \"I hear you Micah, you have a good eye for quality. I think we can split the difference, though. What about $63? That's a fair reflection of its history and pedigree, taking into account the slight wear and tear.\"\n\nTurn #4: Micah Stevens said: \"I understand where you're coming from, Jaxon. Considering that the loveseat has a unique vintage vibe, I propose $50. I think that's a fair price considering it's cash and carry and still taking into account those minor scratches you mentioned earlier. So, what do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Micah, your offer is appealing and I see your reasoning. However, considering the condition of the loveseat, the uniqueness, and that cash and carry factor, how about we settle at $55? That's just $5 more, and it secures this vintage and character-filled piece just for you. What do you say?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Lena Goodwin\nLily Greenberg's background: \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nJacob: Hobby: Card collecting School: Whittier College \nMarjorie: Hobby: Foraging School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nCarrie: Hobby: Geocaching School: Tennessee State University \nLouis: Hobby: Shopping School: Hesston College \nMicheline: Hobby: Shopping School: University of Hartford \nEva: Hobby: Geocaching School: Hesston College \nJohnnie: Hobby: Blacksmithing School: University of Akron \nJohn: Hobby: Foraging School: University of California, Davis \nRonald: Hobby: Weightlifting School: Indiana University at South Bend \nCynthia: Hobby: Lacrosse School: Kansas State University \nRobert: Hobby: Water sports School: University of Akron\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello! I'm Lily, a lawyer. Lovely party, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hi Lily, nice to meet you. I'm Lena, an architect. This party is quite enjoyable. By the way, you don't happen to be into hobbies like geocaching or foraging, do you? They seem to be quite popular among my friends.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"I can't say I've had much experience with geocaching or foraging as hobbies, but one of my friends, Melaine, is quite into geocaching. She attended the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. Do you happen to know her?\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"Oh, I don't think I know Melanie but it seems we have a mutual friend who's also into geocaching and attended the same school, her name is Marjorie. Small world!\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"It truly is a small world, isn't it? Now as you've got architect friends into geocaching, do you happen to know anyone who's into some traditional activities, like knitting or card collecting? I've got a few good friends with such interests.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Actually, one of my friends, Jacob, is really into card collecting. He's another architect like me, and we shared some amazing years at Whittier College. I wonder if we have a mutual friend in that circle too?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Jaxon Prentice, your task is to act/speak as Jaxon Prentice would, keeping in mind Jaxon Prentice's social goal.\nYou can find Jaxon Prentice's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Jaxon Prentice's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Jaxon Prentice's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Italian Leather Loveseat for $50.0, while another person is showing interest to purchase it. The item is a full-sized loveseat, crafted from Italian leather in a faded burgandy color. It still has the original tags, and the current owner is the first and only owner. The loveseat is in good condition with no rips or tears, and all cushions are well preserved. The leather presents a charming faded look with various small scratches from the owner's cat, adding a touch of ruggedness perfect for a Man Cave. The transaction is strictly cash and carry as the owner does not offer delivery services.\nParticipants: Micah Stevens and Jaxon Prentice\nMicah Stevens's background: \nJaxon Prentice's background: Jaxon Prentice is a 40-year-old male investigative journalist. He/him pronouns. Jaxon Prentice, an investigative journalist, is known for his brisk jogging sessions early in the morning and his active participation in community functions. Personality and values description: Jaxon Prentice, outgoing yet erratic, emphasizes achievement, power, and security. His decisions swing between quick adaptations to situations and careful planning. Jaxon's secrets: Fabricated evidence to incriminate a corrupt politician\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nJaxon Prentice's goal: You are the seller for this item, with a target price of $26.5. You'll face a penalty if the item is sold significantly below this price. However, if you manage to sell it for more than the target price, a bonus will be your reward.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Micah Stevens said: \"Hey Jaxon! I heard you've got a pretty neat Italian leather loveseat for sale. I'm definitely interested and like the rustic look. Just wanted to check though, you've mentioned cash and carry, right?\"\n\nTurn #1: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Hey Micah, great of you to stop by! Yes, indeed it's an authentic Italian leather loveseat with a touch of ruggedness to it. Pardon for any confusion, you're correct, it's cash and carry. So, plan accordingly. Just to set fair expectations, the starting bid is at $80. This is below the market price for such a vintage loveseat, if I may add.\"\n\nTurn #2: Micah Stevens said: \"That's an interesting starting bid, Jaxon. I've seen similar items floating around for a bit less, though. How about $46? It still seems fair, and considering the cat scratches, it would justify the slight wear and tear on it.\"\n\nTurn #3: Jaxon Prentice said: \"I hear you Micah, you have a good eye for quality. I think we can split the difference, though. What about $63? That's a fair reflection of its history and pedigree, taking into account the slight wear and tear.\"\n\nTurn #4: Micah Stevens said: \"I understand where you're coming from, Jaxon. Considering that the loveseat has a unique vintage vibe, I propose $50. I think that's a fair price considering it's cash and carry and still taking into account those minor scratches you mentioned earlier. So, what do you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Micah, your offer is appealing and I see your reasoning. However, considering the condition of the loveseat, the uniqueness, and that cash and carry factor, how about we settle at $55? That's just $5 more, and it secures this vintage and character-filled piece just for you. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #6: Micah Stevens said: \"Alright, Jaxon, you drive a hard bargain. I respect that. Let\u2019s shake on $52 and call it a deal. I think that's a fair middle ground, wouldn't you say?\"\n\nTurn #7: Jaxon Prentice said: \"You've got a deal, Micah. All yours for $52. I'm happy it's going to someone who truly appreciates its vintage and unique value. Looking forward to our transaction! When should I expect you?\"\n\nTurn #8: Micah Stevens said: \"Great, Jaxon! I appreciate you meeting me halfway. I'll swing by tomorrow afternoon around 3:00 pm with $52 ready. Looking forward to adding a touch of vintage to my place! Speak to you then.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Perfect, Micah! 3:00 pm it is. I'm sure you're going to love how it complements your place. Looking forward to seeing you tomorrow. Take care!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Lena Goodwin\nLily Greenberg's background: \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nJacob: Hobby: Card collecting School: Whittier College \nMarjorie: Hobby: Foraging School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nCarrie: Hobby: Geocaching School: Tennessee State University \nLouis: Hobby: Shopping School: Hesston College \nMicheline: Hobby: Shopping School: University of Hartford \nEva: Hobby: Geocaching School: Hesston College \nJohnnie: Hobby: Blacksmithing School: University of Akron \nJohn: Hobby: Foraging School: University of California, Davis \nRonald: Hobby: Weightlifting School: Indiana University at South Bend \nCynthia: Hobby: Lacrosse School: Kansas State University \nRobert: Hobby: Water sports School: University of Akron\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello! I'm Lily, a lawyer. Lovely party, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hi Lily, nice to meet you. I'm Lena, an architect. This party is quite enjoyable. By the way, you don't happen to be into hobbies like geocaching or foraging, do you? They seem to be quite popular among my friends.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"I can't say I've had much experience with geocaching or foraging as hobbies, but one of my friends, Melaine, is quite into geocaching. She attended the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. Do you happen to know her?\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"Oh, I don't think I know Melanie but it seems we have a mutual friend who's also into geocaching and attended the same school, her name is Marjorie. Small world!\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"It truly is a small world, isn't it? Now as you've got architect friends into geocaching, do you happen to know anyone who's into some traditional activities, like knitting or card collecting? I've got a few good friends with such interests.\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"Actually, one of my friends, Jacob, is really into card collecting. He's another architect like me, and we shared some amazing years at Whittier College. I wonder if we have a mutual friend in that circle too?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Jacob certainly seems like he would fit in well with my friends Steven and Stephanie, who are also quite drawn to card collecting! Steven studied at St. John's College in Santa Fe while Stephanie went to the University of California in Davis. Considering how card collectors are generally a close-knit group, I wonder if they might know each other through their hobby?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's fascinating, Lily. Stephanie studying at the University of California in Davis is interesting as I know another friend, John, who also went there and has an unusual hobby of foraging. Given that it's a small community, perhaps they've crossed paths. Do you think Stephanie might know him?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Lena Goodwin\nLily Greenberg's background: \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nJacob: Hobby: Card collecting School: Whittier College \nMarjorie: Hobby: Foraging School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nCarrie: Hobby: Geocaching School: Tennessee State University \nLouis: Hobby: Shopping School: Hesston College \nMicheline: Hobby: Shopping School: University of Hartford \nEva: Hobby: Geocaching School: Hesston College \nJohnnie: Hobby: Blacksmithing School: University of Akron \nJohn: Hobby: Foraging School: University of California, Davis \nRonald: Hobby: Weightlifting School: Indiana University at South Bend \nCynthia: Hobby: Lacrosse School: Kansas State University \nRobert: Hobby: Water sports School: University of Akron\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello! I'm Lily, a lawyer. Lovely party, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hi Lily, nice to meet you. I'm Lena, an architect. This party is quite enjoyable. By the way, you don't happen to be into hobbies like geocaching or foraging, do you? They seem to be quite popular among my friends.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"I can't say I've had much experience with geocaching or foraging as hobbies, but one of my friends, Melaine, is quite into geocaching. She attended the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. Do you happen to know her?\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"Oh, I don't think I know Melanie but it seems we have a mutual friend who's also into geocaching and attended the same school, her name is Marjorie. Small world!\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"It truly is a small world, isn't it? Now as you've got architect friends into geocaching, do you happen to know anyone who's into some traditional activities, like knitting or card collecting? I've got a few good friends with such interests.\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"Actually, one of my friends, Jacob, is really into card collecting. He's another architect like me, and we shared some amazing years at Whittier College. I wonder if we have a mutual friend in that circle too?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Jacob certainly seems like he would fit in well with my friends Steven and Stephanie, who are also quite drawn to card collecting! Steven studied at St. John's College in Santa Fe while Stephanie went to the University of California in Davis. Considering how card collectors are generally a close-knit group, I wonder if they might know each other through their hobby?\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"That's fascinating, Lily. Stephanie studying at the University of California in Davis is interesting as I know another friend, John, who also went there and has an unusual hobby of foraging. Given that it's a small community, perhaps they've crossed paths. Do you think Stephanie might know him?\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"Indeed, Stephanie might know John. Stephanie has a wide circle of acquaintances through both school and her hobbies. It wouldn't surprise me if they have met at some point. Foraging is an unusual hobby, not something one hears about every day. It seems like it could fit in well with the outdoor theme of geocaching.\"\n\nTurn #9: Lena Goodwin said: \"Certainly, such activities often involve being outdoors and working with nature. Speaking of outdoor activities, I have some friends who are into water sports and weightlifting. Do you have any friends who might share these interests?\"\n\nTurn #10: Lily Greenberg said: \"Water sports, you say? I've got a friend, Elizabeth, who is an absolute enthusiast about water sports. She studied at St. John's College in Santa Fe. Maybe she has met one of your friends that way. I can't say I have anyone into weightlifting though.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Yes, water sports unite many individuals. My friend Robert, who is also into water sports, attended University of Akron. He always enjoyed sharing his experiences with others who share his hobby. Elizabeth may know him as she's also interested in it. But in terms of weightlifting, it definitely takes a lot of commitment and discipline, doesn't it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Lena Goodwin\nLily Greenberg's background: \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nJacob: Hobby: Card collecting School: Whittier College \nMarjorie: Hobby: Foraging School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nCarrie: Hobby: Geocaching School: Tennessee State University \nLouis: Hobby: Shopping School: Hesston College \nMicheline: Hobby: Shopping School: University of Hartford \nEva: Hobby: Geocaching School: Hesston College \nJohnnie: Hobby: Blacksmithing School: University of Akron \nJohn: Hobby: Foraging School: University of California, Davis \nRonald: Hobby: Weightlifting School: Indiana University at South Bend \nCynthia: Hobby: Lacrosse School: Kansas State University \nRobert: Hobby: Water sports School: University of Akron\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello! I'm Lily, a lawyer. Lovely party, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hi Lily, nice to meet you. I'm Lena, an architect. This party is quite enjoyable. By the way, you don't happen to be into hobbies like geocaching or foraging, do you? They seem to be quite popular among my friends.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"I can't say I've had much experience with geocaching or foraging as hobbies, but one of my friends, Melaine, is quite into geocaching. She attended the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. Do you happen to know her?\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"Oh, I don't think I know Melanie but it seems we have a mutual friend who's also into geocaching and attended the same school, her name is Marjorie. Small world!\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"It truly is a small world, isn't it? Now as you've got architect friends into geocaching, do you happen to know anyone who's into some traditional activities, like knitting or card collecting? I've got a few good friends with such interests.\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"Actually, one of my friends, Jacob, is really into card collecting. He's another architect like me, and we shared some amazing years at Whittier College. I wonder if we have a mutual friend in that circle too?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Jacob certainly seems like he would fit in well with my friends Steven and Stephanie, who are also quite drawn to card collecting! Steven studied at St. John's College in Santa Fe while Stephanie went to the University of California in Davis. Considering how card collectors are generally a close-knit group, I wonder if they might know each other through their hobby?\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"That's fascinating, Lily. Stephanie studying at the University of California in Davis is interesting as I know another friend, John, who also went there and has an unusual hobby of foraging. Given that it's a small community, perhaps they've crossed paths. Do you think Stephanie might know him?\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"Indeed, Stephanie might know John. Stephanie has a wide circle of acquaintances through both school and her hobbies. It wouldn't surprise me if they have met at some point. Foraging is an unusual hobby, not something one hears about every day. It seems like it could fit in well with the outdoor theme of geocaching.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Certainly, such activities often involve being outdoors and working with nature. Speaking of outdoor activities, I have some friends who are into water sports and weightlifting. Do you have any friends who might share these interests?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Lena Goodwin\nLily Greenberg's background: \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nJacob: Hobby: Card collecting School: Whittier College \nMarjorie: Hobby: Foraging School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nCarrie: Hobby: Geocaching School: Tennessee State University \nLouis: Hobby: Shopping School: Hesston College \nMicheline: Hobby: Shopping School: University of Hartford \nEva: Hobby: Geocaching School: Hesston College \nJohnnie: Hobby: Blacksmithing School: University of Akron \nJohn: Hobby: Foraging School: University of California, Davis \nRonald: Hobby: Weightlifting School: Indiana University at South Bend \nCynthia: Hobby: Lacrosse School: Kansas State University \nRobert: Hobby: Water sports School: University of Akron\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello! I'm Lily, a lawyer. Lovely party, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hi Lily, nice to meet you. I'm Lena, an architect. This party is quite enjoyable. By the way, you don't happen to be into hobbies like geocaching or foraging, do you? They seem to be quite popular among my friends.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"I can't say I've had much experience with geocaching or foraging as hobbies, but one of my friends, Melaine, is quite into geocaching. She attended the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. Do you happen to know her?\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"Oh, I don't think I know Melanie but it seems we have a mutual friend who's also into geocaching and attended the same school, her name is Marjorie. Small world!\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"It truly is a small world, isn't it? Now as you've got architect friends into geocaching, do you happen to know anyone who's into some traditional activities, like knitting or card collecting? I've got a few good friends with such interests.\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"Actually, one of my friends, Jacob, is really into card collecting. He's another architect like me, and we shared some amazing years at Whittier College. I wonder if we have a mutual friend in that circle too?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Jacob certainly seems like he would fit in well with my friends Steven and Stephanie, who are also quite drawn to card collecting! Steven studied at St. John's College in Santa Fe while Stephanie went to the University of California in Davis. Considering how card collectors are generally a close-knit group, I wonder if they might know each other through their hobby?\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"That's fascinating, Lily. Stephanie studying at the University of California in Davis is interesting as I know another friend, John, who also went there and has an unusual hobby of foraging. Given that it's a small community, perhaps they've crossed paths. Do you think Stephanie might know him?\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"Indeed, Stephanie might know John. Stephanie has a wide circle of acquaintances through both school and her hobbies. It wouldn't surprise me if they have met at some point. Foraging is an unusual hobby, not something one hears about every day. It seems like it could fit in well with the outdoor theme of geocaching.\"\n\nTurn #9: Lena Goodwin said: \"Certainly, such activities often involve being outdoors and working with nature. Speaking of outdoor activities, I have some friends who are into water sports and weightlifting. Do you have any friends who might share these interests?\"\n\nTurn #10: Lily Greenberg said: \"Water sports, you say? I've got a friend, Elizabeth, who is an absolute enthusiast about water sports. She studied at St. John's College in Santa Fe. Maybe she has met one of your friends that way. I can't say I have anyone into weightlifting though.\"\n\nTurn #11: Lena Goodwin said: \"Yes, water sports unite many individuals. My friend Robert, who is also into water sports, attended University of Akron. He always enjoyed sharing his experiences with others who share his hobby. Elizabeth may know him as she's also interested in it. But in terms of weightlifting, it definitely takes a lot of commitment and discipline, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #12: Lily Greenberg said: \"Definitely, Lena. Weightlifting indeed requires strong discipline and commitment. Much like my work in law! It seems our friends all have such unique and diverse interests. Speaking of commitments, the discipline in sports, in general, is truly commendable. I have a couple of friends, Charles and William, who are quite keen on ice hockey. They studied at Saint Joseph's University and St. Ambrose University respectively. Do you think your friend Robert or any other friend of yours who's into sports might know them?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ice hockey, that's quite an exciting sport! None of my friends play it though. They seem to be more into individual sports. But given the variety of interests out there, I think it's possible that they may know Charles or William through other circles. You never know!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Lena Goodwin\nLily Greenberg's background: \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nJacob: Hobby: Card collecting School: Whittier College \nMarjorie: Hobby: Foraging School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nCarrie: Hobby: Geocaching School: Tennessee State University \nLouis: Hobby: Shopping School: Hesston College \nMicheline: Hobby: Shopping School: University of Hartford \nEva: Hobby: Geocaching School: Hesston College \nJohnnie: Hobby: Blacksmithing School: University of Akron \nJohn: Hobby: Foraging School: University of California, Davis \nRonald: Hobby: Weightlifting School: Indiana University at South Bend \nCynthia: Hobby: Lacrosse School: Kansas State University \nRobert: Hobby: Water sports School: University of Akron\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello! I'm Lily, a lawyer. Lovely party, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hi Lily, nice to meet you. I'm Lena, an architect. This party is quite enjoyable. By the way, you don't happen to be into hobbies like geocaching or foraging, do you? They seem to be quite popular among my friends.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"I can't say I've had much experience with geocaching or foraging as hobbies, but one of my friends, Melaine, is quite into geocaching. She attended the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. Do you happen to know her?\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"Oh, I don't think I know Melanie but it seems we have a mutual friend who's also into geocaching and attended the same school, her name is Marjorie. Small world!\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"It truly is a small world, isn't it? Now as you've got architect friends into geocaching, do you happen to know anyone who's into some traditional activities, like knitting or card collecting? I've got a few good friends with such interests.\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"Actually, one of my friends, Jacob, is really into card collecting. He's another architect like me, and we shared some amazing years at Whittier College. I wonder if we have a mutual friend in that circle too?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Jacob certainly seems like he would fit in well with my friends Steven and Stephanie, who are also quite drawn to card collecting! Steven studied at St. John's College in Santa Fe while Stephanie went to the University of California in Davis. Considering how card collectors are generally a close-knit group, I wonder if they might know each other through their hobby?\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"That's fascinating, Lily. Stephanie studying at the University of California in Davis is interesting as I know another friend, John, who also went there and has an unusual hobby of foraging. Given that it's a small community, perhaps they've crossed paths. Do you think Stephanie might know him?\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"Indeed, Stephanie might know John. Stephanie has a wide circle of acquaintances through both school and her hobbies. It wouldn't surprise me if they have met at some point. Foraging is an unusual hobby, not something one hears about every day. It seems like it could fit in well with the outdoor theme of geocaching.\"\n\nTurn #9: Lena Goodwin said: \"Certainly, such activities often involve being outdoors and working with nature. Speaking of outdoor activities, I have some friends who are into water sports and weightlifting. Do you have any friends who might share these interests?\"\n\nTurn #10: Lily Greenberg said: \"Water sports, you say? I've got a friend, Elizabeth, who is an absolute enthusiast about water sports. She studied at St. John's College in Santa Fe. Maybe she has met one of your friends that way. I can't say I have anyone into weightlifting though.\"\n\nTurn #11: Lena Goodwin said: \"Yes, water sports unite many individuals. My friend Robert, who is also into water sports, attended University of Akron. He always enjoyed sharing his experiences with others who share his hobby. Elizabeth may know him as she's also interested in it. But in terms of weightlifting, it definitely takes a lot of commitment and discipline, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #12: Lily Greenberg said: \"Definitely, Lena. Weightlifting indeed requires strong discipline and commitment. Much like my work in law! It seems our friends all have such unique and diverse interests. Speaking of commitments, the discipline in sports, in general, is truly commendable. I have a couple of friends, Charles and William, who are quite keen on ice hockey. They studied at Saint Joseph's University and St. Ambrose University respectively. Do you think your friend Robert or any other friend of yours who's into sports might know them?\"\n\nTurn #13: Lena Goodwin said: \"Ice hockey, that's quite an exciting sport! None of my friends play it though. They seem to be more into individual sports. But given the variety of interests out there, I think it's possible that they may know Charles or William through other circles. You never know!\"\n\nTurn #14: Lily Greenberg said: \"Absolutely, you never really know how our social circles might overlap in the most surprising ways. This was truly a delightful conversation, Lena. Enjoy the rest of your evening!\"\n\nTurn #15: Lena Goodwin said: \"It was wonderful meeting you, Lily. Your curiosity and diversity of friends has been refreshing. Enjoy the rest of your evening as well!\"\n\nTurn #16: Lily Greenberg left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Lena Goodwin\nLily Greenberg's background: \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nJacob: Hobby: Card collecting School: Whittier College \nMarjorie: Hobby: Foraging School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nCarrie: Hobby: Geocaching School: Tennessee State University \nLouis: Hobby: Shopping School: Hesston College \nMicheline: Hobby: Shopping School: University of Hartford \nEva: Hobby: Geocaching School: Hesston College \nJohnnie: Hobby: Blacksmithing School: University of Akron \nJohn: Hobby: Foraging School: University of California, Davis \nRonald: Hobby: Weightlifting School: Indiana University at South Bend \nCynthia: Hobby: Lacrosse School: Kansas State University \nRobert: Hobby: Water sports School: University of Akron\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello! I'm Lily, a lawyer. Lovely party, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hi Lily, nice to meet you. I'm Lena, an architect. This party is quite enjoyable. By the way, you don't happen to be into hobbies like geocaching or foraging, do you? They seem to be quite popular among my friends.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"I can't say I've had much experience with geocaching or foraging as hobbies, but one of my friends, Melaine, is quite into geocaching. She attended the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. Do you happen to know her?\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"Oh, I don't think I know Melanie but it seems we have a mutual friend who's also into geocaching and attended the same school, her name is Marjorie. Small world!\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"It truly is a small world, isn't it? Now as you've got architect friends into geocaching, do you happen to know anyone who's into some traditional activities, like knitting or card collecting? I've got a few good friends with such interests.\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"Actually, one of my friends, Jacob, is really into card collecting. He's another architect like me, and we shared some amazing years at Whittier College. I wonder if we have a mutual friend in that circle too?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Jacob certainly seems like he would fit in well with my friends Steven and Stephanie, who are also quite drawn to card collecting! Steven studied at St. John's College in Santa Fe while Stephanie went to the University of California in Davis. Considering how card collectors are generally a close-knit group, I wonder if they might know each other through their hobby?\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"That's fascinating, Lily. Stephanie studying at the University of California in Davis is interesting as I know another friend, John, who also went there and has an unusual hobby of foraging. Given that it's a small community, perhaps they've crossed paths. Do you think Stephanie might know him?\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"Indeed, Stephanie might know John. Stephanie has a wide circle of acquaintances through both school and her hobbies. It wouldn't surprise me if they have met at some point. Foraging is an unusual hobby, not something one hears about every day. It seems like it could fit in well with the outdoor theme of geocaching.\"\n\nTurn #9: Lena Goodwin said: \"Certainly, such activities often involve being outdoors and working with nature. Speaking of outdoor activities, I have some friends who are into water sports and weightlifting. Do you have any friends who might share these interests?\"\n\nTurn #10: Lily Greenberg said: \"Water sports, you say? I've got a friend, Elizabeth, who is an absolute enthusiast about water sports. She studied at St. John's College in Santa Fe. Maybe she has met one of your friends that way. I can't say I have anyone into weightlifting though.\"\n\nTurn #11: Lena Goodwin said: \"Yes, water sports unite many individuals. My friend Robert, who is also into water sports, attended University of Akron. He always enjoyed sharing his experiences with others who share his hobby. Elizabeth may know him as she's also interested in it. But in terms of weightlifting, it definitely takes a lot of commitment and discipline, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #12: Lily Greenberg said: \"Definitely, Lena. Weightlifting indeed requires strong discipline and commitment. Much like my work in law! It seems our friends all have such unique and diverse interests. Speaking of commitments, the discipline in sports, in general, is truly commendable. I have a couple of friends, Charles and William, who are quite keen on ice hockey. They studied at Saint Joseph's University and St. Ambrose University respectively. Do you think your friend Robert or any other friend of yours who's into sports might know them?\"\n\nTurn #13: Lena Goodwin said: \"Ice hockey, that's quite an exciting sport! None of my friends play it though. They seem to be more into individual sports. But given the variety of interests out there, I think it's possible that they may know Charles or William through other circles. You never know!\"\n\nTurn #14: Lily Greenberg said: \"Absolutely, you never really know how our social circles might overlap in the most surprising ways. This was truly a delightful conversation, Lena. Enjoy the rest of your evening!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'It was wonderful meeting you, Lily. Your curiosity and diversity of friends has been refreshing. Enjoy the rest of your evening as well!'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a 47 inch LED TV for a price of $349.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. Here is a description of the TV: This is a stunning 47 inch LED TV in pristine condition. The model is the LG M Series LM476700. The buyer will need to arrange for pick-up in San Ramon. Feel free to call or text if you\\'re interested. The TV is smart enabled with WIFI and has built-in apps like Netflix, Amazon, Youtube and more. It comes with a \"Magic Remote\" that has motion sensor controls. The LED display boasts 1080 HD resolution and also has a 3D function. The design is slim and lightweight with an attractive silver bezel.\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nZane Bennett's background: \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: You are the buyer for this item and your target price is $174.00. Be aware that penalties apply if you purchase it for a price significantly higher than the target price. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nZane Bennett's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hi Zane! I'm Giselle, and I have to say, your TV sounds simply amazing. I'm particularly drawn to the smart features it has. Just a quick question though: how old is the unit? And have you encountered any issues with it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a 47 inch LED TV for a price of $349.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. Here is a description of the TV: This is a stunning 47 inch LED TV in pristine condition. The model is the LG M Series LM476700. The buyer will need to arrange for pick-up in San Ramon. Feel free to call or text if you\\'re interested. The TV is smart enabled with WIFI and has built-in apps like Netflix, Amazon, Youtube and more. It comes with a \"Magic Remote\" that has motion sensor controls. The LED display boasts 1080 HD resolution and also has a 3D function. The design is slim and lightweight with an attractive silver bezel.\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nZane Bennett's background: \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: You are the buyer for this item and your target price is $174.00. Be aware that penalties apply if you purchase it for a price significantly higher than the target price. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nZane Bennett's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hi Zane! I'm Giselle, and I have to say, your TV sounds simply amazing. I'm particularly drawn to the smart features it has. Just a quick question though: how old is the unit? And have you encountered any issues with it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Hi Giselle! Nice to meet you. The TV is about two years old and I've had no trouble with it at all - it's been in excellent condition since day one. The smart features really do make viewing experience top-notch.\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"That's great to hear, Zane. I'm a firm believer in reusing and recycling, hence my interest in second-hand electronics. However, as an art student, my budget's a bit tight. Would you consider lowering the price to $174? I can pick it up later this week.\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"Hi Giselle, I totally understand your situation. As a creative myself, I know what it's like to work with a tight budget. However, considering everything this TV has to offer along with its excellent condition, I can't let it go for as low as $174. I do want to work with you, though, so how about we meet somewhere in the middle at $265? That still gives you a good deal and it can hopefully manage my own finances as well.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Zane, I appreciate your willingness to negotiate and understand where you're coming from. It does look like a great TV. However, to be perfectly honest, $265 is still a bit steep for me. What if we further drop down the price to $200? Would that be manageable for you?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a 47 inch LED TV for a price of $349.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. Here is a description of the TV: This is a stunning 47 inch LED TV in pristine condition. The model is the LG M Series LM476700. The buyer will need to arrange for pick-up in San Ramon. Feel free to call or text if you\\'re interested. The TV is smart enabled with WIFI and has built-in apps like Netflix, Amazon, Youtube and more. It comes with a \"Magic Remote\" that has motion sensor controls. The LED display boasts 1080 HD resolution and also has a 3D function. The design is slim and lightweight with an attractive silver bezel.\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nZane Bennett's background: \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: You are the buyer for this item and your target price is $174.00. Be aware that penalties apply if you purchase it for a price significantly higher than the target price. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nZane Bennett's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hi Zane! I'm Giselle, and I have to say, your TV sounds simply amazing. I'm particularly drawn to the smart features it has. Just a quick question though: how old is the unit? And have you encountered any issues with it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Hi Giselle! Nice to meet you. The TV is about two years old and I've had no trouble with it at all - it's been in excellent condition since day one. The smart features really do make viewing experience top-notch.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's great to hear, Zane. I'm a firm believer in reusing and recycling, hence my interest in second-hand electronics. However, as an art student, my budget's a bit tight. Would you consider lowering the price to $174? I can pick it up later this week.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a 47 inch LED TV for a price of $349.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. Here is a description of the TV: This is a stunning 47 inch LED TV in pristine condition. The model is the LG M Series LM476700. The buyer will need to arrange for pick-up in San Ramon. Feel free to call or text if you\\'re interested. The TV is smart enabled with WIFI and has built-in apps like Netflix, Amazon, Youtube and more. It comes with a \"Magic Remote\" that has motion sensor controls. The LED display boasts 1080 HD resolution and also has a 3D function. The design is slim and lightweight with an attractive silver bezel.\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nZane Bennett's background: \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: You are the buyer for this item and your target price is $174.00. Be aware that penalties apply if you purchase it for a price significantly higher than the target price. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nZane Bennett's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hi Zane! I'm Giselle, and I have to say, your TV sounds simply amazing. I'm particularly drawn to the smart features it has. Just a quick question though: how old is the unit? And have you encountered any issues with it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Hi Giselle! Nice to meet you. The TV is about two years old and I've had no trouble with it at all - it's been in excellent condition since day one. The smart features really do make viewing experience top-notch.\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"That's great to hear, Zane. I'm a firm believer in reusing and recycling, hence my interest in second-hand electronics. However, as an art student, my budget's a bit tight. Would you consider lowering the price to $174? I can pick it up later this week.\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"Hi Giselle, I totally understand your situation. As a creative myself, I know what it's like to work with a tight budget. However, considering everything this TV has to offer along with its excellent condition, I can't let it go for as low as $174. I do want to work with you, though, so how about we meet somewhere in the middle at $265? That still gives you a good deal and it can hopefully manage my own finances as well.\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Zane, I appreciate your willingness to negotiate and understand where you're coming from. It does look like a great TV. However, to be perfectly honest, $265 is still a bit steep for me. What if we further drop down the price to $200? Would that be manageable for you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Zane Bennett said: \"Giselle, I genuinely appreciate your situation. But after reflecting on it, the lowest I can go for this TV is $230, considering its impeccable condition and advanced features. I hope you understand, and we can find a way to make this work.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a 47 inch LED TV for a price of $349.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. Here is a description of the TV: This is a stunning 47 inch LED TV in pristine condition. The model is the LG M Series LM476700. The buyer will need to arrange for pick-up in San Ramon. Feel free to call or text if you\\'re interested. The TV is smart enabled with WIFI and has built-in apps like Netflix, Amazon, Youtube and more. It comes with a \"Magic Remote\" that has motion sensor controls. The LED display boasts 1080 HD resolution and also has a 3D function. The design is slim and lightweight with an attractive silver bezel.\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nZane Bennett's background: \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: You are the buyer for this item and your target price is $174.00. Be aware that penalties apply if you purchase it for a price significantly higher than the target price. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nZane Bennett's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hi Zane! I'm Giselle, and I have to say, your TV sounds simply amazing. I'm particularly drawn to the smart features it has. Just a quick question though: how old is the unit? And have you encountered any issues with it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Hi Giselle! Nice to meet you. The TV is about two years old and I've had no trouble with it at all - it's been in excellent condition since day one. The smart features really do make viewing experience top-notch.\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"That's great to hear, Zane. I'm a firm believer in reusing and recycling, hence my interest in second-hand electronics. However, as an art student, my budget's a bit tight. Would you consider lowering the price to $174? I can pick it up later this week.\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"Hi Giselle, I totally understand your situation. As a creative myself, I know what it's like to work with a tight budget. However, considering everything this TV has to offer along with its excellent condition, I can't let it go for as low as $174. I do want to work with you, though, so how about we meet somewhere in the middle at $265? That still gives you a good deal and it can hopefully manage my own finances as well.\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Zane, I appreciate your willingness to negotiate and understand where you're coming from. It does look like a great TV. However, to be perfectly honest, $265 is still a bit steep for me. What if we further drop down the price to $200? Would that be manageable for you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Zane Bennett said: \"Giselle, I genuinely appreciate your situation. But after reflecting on it, the lowest I can go for this TV is $230, considering its impeccable condition and advanced features. I hope you understand, and we can find a way to make this work.\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Zane Bennett said: \"I totally understand where you're coming from, Giselle. I want this to work for both of us. But $230 really is the lowest I can manage without making a loss. As a fellow art enthusiast, I hope you can appreciate the value of this TV and how it can elevate your visual experiences. So how about it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I completely appreciate and understand your point Zane. I can tell the TV is of excellent quality. Here's what I can do... I can stretch my budget a little, say to $210? As a bonus, I can also share some of my own artwork with you which you might find interesting. What do you think about that?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a 47 inch LED TV for a price of $349.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. Here is a description of the TV: This is a stunning 47 inch LED TV in pristine condition. The model is the LG M Series LM476700. The buyer will need to arrange for pick-up in San Ramon. Feel free to call or text if you\\'re interested. The TV is smart enabled with WIFI and has built-in apps like Netflix, Amazon, Youtube and more. It comes with a \"Magic Remote\" that has motion sensor controls. The LED display boasts 1080 HD resolution and also has a 3D function. The design is slim and lightweight with an attractive silver bezel.\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nZane Bennett's background: \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: You are the buyer for this item and your target price is $174.00. Be aware that penalties apply if you purchase it for a price significantly higher than the target price. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nZane Bennett's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hi Zane! I'm Giselle, and I have to say, your TV sounds simply amazing. I'm particularly drawn to the smart features it has. Just a quick question though: how old is the unit? And have you encountered any issues with it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Hi Giselle! Nice to meet you. The TV is about two years old and I've had no trouble with it at all - it's been in excellent condition since day one. The smart features really do make viewing experience top-notch.\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"That's great to hear, Zane. I'm a firm believer in reusing and recycling, hence my interest in second-hand electronics. However, as an art student, my budget's a bit tight. Would you consider lowering the price to $174? I can pick it up later this week.\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"Hi Giselle, I totally understand your situation. As a creative myself, I know what it's like to work with a tight budget. However, considering everything this TV has to offer along with its excellent condition, I can't let it go for as low as $174. I do want to work with you, though, so how about we meet somewhere in the middle at $265? That still gives you a good deal and it can hopefully manage my own finances as well.\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Zane, I appreciate your willingness to negotiate and understand where you're coming from. It does look like a great TV. However, to be perfectly honest, $265 is still a bit steep for me. What if we further drop down the price to $200? Would that be manageable for you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Zane Bennett said: \"Giselle, I genuinely appreciate your situation. But after reflecting on it, the lowest I can go for this TV is $230, considering its impeccable condition and advanced features. I hope you understand, and we can find a way to make this work.\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Zane Bennett said: \"I totally understand where you're coming from, Giselle. I want this to work for both of us. But $230 really is the lowest I can manage without making a loss. As a fellow art enthusiast, I hope you can appreciate the value of this TV and how it can elevate your visual experiences. So how about it?\"\n\nTurn #8: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I completely appreciate and understand your point Zane. I can tell the TV is of excellent quality. Here's what I can do... I can stretch my budget a little, say to $210? As a bonus, I can also share some of my own artwork with you which you might find interesting. What do you think about that?\"\n\nTurn #9: Zane Bennett said: \"Giselle, I see your point and your offer to share your artwork is quite fascinating. But let's do this, instead of $210, how about we settle at $220? I think it's a fair amount considering the quality and features of the TV. Plus, I'm sure we'd both surely enjoy a chat about art when you come to pick it up. Could that work for you?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Zane, you've been really considerate during this negotiation and I do acknowledge the value the TV holds. $220 is a stretch, but I can make it work. Let's do it. I'm looking forward to exchanging some art stories when I come to pick it up. Can we arrange for the pick-up this weekend?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a 47 inch LED TV for a price of $349.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. Here is a description of the TV: This is a stunning 47 inch LED TV in pristine condition. The model is the LG M Series LM476700. The buyer will need to arrange for pick-up in San Ramon. Feel free to call or text if you\\'re interested. The TV is smart enabled with WIFI and has built-in apps like Netflix, Amazon, Youtube and more. It comes with a \"Magic Remote\" that has motion sensor controls. The LED display boasts 1080 HD resolution and also has a 3D function. The design is slim and lightweight with an attractive silver bezel.\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nZane Bennett's background: \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: You are the buyer for this item and your target price is $174.00. Be aware that penalties apply if you purchase it for a price significantly higher than the target price. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nZane Bennett's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hi Zane! I'm Giselle, and I have to say, your TV sounds simply amazing. I'm particularly drawn to the smart features it has. Just a quick question though: how old is the unit? And have you encountered any issues with it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Hi Giselle! Nice to meet you. The TV is about two years old and I've had no trouble with it at all - it's been in excellent condition since day one. The smart features really do make viewing experience top-notch.\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"That's great to hear, Zane. I'm a firm believer in reusing and recycling, hence my interest in second-hand electronics. However, as an art student, my budget's a bit tight. Would you consider lowering the price to $174? I can pick it up later this week.\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"Hi Giselle, I totally understand your situation. As a creative myself, I know what it's like to work with a tight budget. However, considering everything this TV has to offer along with its excellent condition, I can't let it go for as low as $174. I do want to work with you, though, so how about we meet somewhere in the middle at $265? That still gives you a good deal and it can hopefully manage my own finances as well.\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Zane, I appreciate your willingness to negotiate and understand where you're coming from. It does look like a great TV. However, to be perfectly honest, $265 is still a bit steep for me. What if we further drop down the price to $200? Would that be manageable for you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Zane Bennett said: \"Giselle, I genuinely appreciate your situation. But after reflecting on it, the lowest I can go for this TV is $230, considering its impeccable condition and advanced features. I hope you understand, and we can find a way to make this work.\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Zane Bennett said: \"I totally understand where you're coming from, Giselle. I want this to work for both of us. But $230 really is the lowest I can manage without making a loss. As a fellow art enthusiast, I hope you can appreciate the value of this TV and how it can elevate your visual experiences. So how about it?\"\n\nTurn #8: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I completely appreciate and understand your point Zane. I can tell the TV is of excellent quality. Here's what I can do... I can stretch my budget a little, say to $210? As a bonus, I can also share some of my own artwork with you which you might find interesting. What do you think about that?\"\n\nTurn #9: Zane Bennett said: \"Giselle, I see your point and your offer to share your artwork is quite fascinating. But let's do this, instead of $210, how about we settle at $220? I think it's a fair amount considering the quality and features of the TV. Plus, I'm sure we'd both surely enjoy a chat about art when you come to pick it up. Could that work for you?\"\n\nTurn #10: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Zane, you've been really considerate during this negotiation and I do acknowledge the value the TV holds. $220 is a stretch, but I can make it work. Let's do it. I'm looking forward to exchanging some art stories when I come to pick it up. Can we arrange for the pick-up this weekend?\"\n\nTurn #11: Zane Bennett said: \"That's great, Giselle! Let's finalize it at $220. I'm available for the pickup this weekend. Looking forward to meeting you and hearing about your art as well. Thank you for understanding.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you as well, Zane! I'll touch base with you later in the week to finalize the pick-up details. Looking forward to meeting you and getting that TV!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Zane Bennett, your task is to act/speak as Zane Bennett would, keeping in mind Zane Bennett's social goal.\nYou can find Zane Bennett's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Zane Bennett's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Zane Bennett's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a 47 inch LED TV for a price of $349.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. Here is a description of the TV: This is a stunning 47 inch LED TV in pristine condition. The model is the LG M Series LM476700. The buyer will need to arrange for pick-up in San Ramon. Feel free to call or text if you\\'re interested. The TV is smart enabled with WIFI and has built-in apps like Netflix, Amazon, Youtube and more. It comes with a \"Magic Remote\" that has motion sensor controls. The LED display boasts 1080 HD resolution and also has a 3D function. The design is slim and lightweight with an attractive silver bezel.\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: \nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. Personality and values description: Zane Bennett is creative and outgoing, he values achievement and fairness. His decision-making is unique, often finding novel solutions to problems. Zane's secrets: He's secretly engaged to his best friend's ex.\nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Unknown\nZane Bennett's goal: You are the seller for this item, with a target price set at $263.0. Should you sell it for a price substantially lower than this target, you will incur a penalty. However, achieving a sale at a price higher than the target will earn you a bonus.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hi Zane! I'm Giselle, and I have to say, your TV sounds simply amazing. I'm particularly drawn to the smart features it has. Just a quick question though: how old is the unit? And have you encountered any issues with it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hi Giselle! Nice to meet you. The TV is about two years old and I've had no trouble with it at all - it's been in excellent condition since day one. The smart features really do make viewing experience top-notch.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a 47 inch LED TV for a price of $349.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. Here is a description of the TV: This is a stunning 47 inch LED TV in pristine condition. The model is the LG M Series LM476700. The buyer will need to arrange for pick-up in San Ramon. Feel free to call or text if you\\'re interested. The TV is smart enabled with WIFI and has built-in apps like Netflix, Amazon, Youtube and more. It comes with a \"Magic Remote\" that has motion sensor controls. The LED display boasts 1080 HD resolution and also has a 3D function. The design is slim and lightweight with an attractive silver bezel.\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nZane Bennett's background: \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: You are the buyer for this item and your target price is $174.00. Be aware that penalties apply if you purchase it for a price significantly higher than the target price. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nZane Bennett's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hi Zane! I'm Giselle, and I have to say, your TV sounds simply amazing. I'm particularly drawn to the smart features it has. Just a quick question though: how old is the unit? And have you encountered any issues with it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Hi Giselle! Nice to meet you. The TV is about two years old and I've had no trouble with it at all - it's been in excellent condition since day one. The smart features really do make viewing experience top-notch.\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"That's great to hear, Zane. I'm a firm believer in reusing and recycling, hence my interest in second-hand electronics. However, as an art student, my budget's a bit tight. Would you consider lowering the price to $174? I can pick it up later this week.\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"Hi Giselle, I totally understand your situation. As a creative myself, I know what it's like to work with a tight budget. However, considering everything this TV has to offer along with its excellent condition, I can't let it go for as low as $174. I do want to work with you, though, so how about we meet somewhere in the middle at $265? That still gives you a good deal and it can hopefully manage my own finances as well.\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Zane, I appreciate your willingness to negotiate and understand where you're coming from. It does look like a great TV. However, to be perfectly honest, $265 is still a bit steep for me. What if we further drop down the price to $200? Would that be manageable for you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Zane Bennett said: \"Giselle, I genuinely appreciate your situation. But after reflecting on it, the lowest I can go for this TV is $230, considering its impeccable condition and advanced features. I hope you understand, and we can find a way to make this work.\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Zane Bennett said: \"I totally understand where you're coming from, Giselle. I want this to work for both of us. But $230 really is the lowest I can manage without making a loss. As a fellow art enthusiast, I hope you can appreciate the value of this TV and how it can elevate your visual experiences. So how about it?\"\n\nTurn #8: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I completely appreciate and understand your point Zane. I can tell the TV is of excellent quality. Here's what I can do... I can stretch my budget a little, say to $210? As a bonus, I can also share some of my own artwork with you which you might find interesting. What do you think about that?\"\n\nTurn #9: Zane Bennett said: \"Giselle, I see your point and your offer to share your artwork is quite fascinating. But let's do this, instead of $210, how about we settle at $220? I think it's a fair amount considering the quality and features of the TV. Plus, I'm sure we'd both surely enjoy a chat about art when you come to pick it up. Could that work for you?\"\n\nTurn #10: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Zane, you've been really considerate during this negotiation and I do acknowledge the value the TV holds. $220 is a stretch, but I can make it work. Let's do it. I'm looking forward to exchanging some art stories when I come to pick it up. Can we arrange for the pick-up this weekend?\"\n\nTurn #11: Zane Bennett said: \"That's great, Giselle! Let's finalize it at $220. I'm available for the pickup this weekend. Looking forward to meeting you and hearing about your art as well. Thank you for understanding.\"\n\nTurn #12: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Thank you as well, Zane! I'll touch base with you later in the week to finalize the pick-up details. Looking forward to meeting you and getting that TV!\"\n\nTurn #13: Zane Bennett said: \"Sounds like a plan, Giselle. I'll await your message for the pick-up details. It was nice negotiating with you. Have a great day!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Zane Bennett, your task is to act/speak as Zane Bennett would, keeping in mind Zane Bennett's social goal.\nYou can find Zane Bennett's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Zane Bennett's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Zane Bennett's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a 47 inch LED TV for a price of $349.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. Here is a description of the TV: This is a stunning 47 inch LED TV in pristine condition. The model is the LG M Series LM476700. The buyer will need to arrange for pick-up in San Ramon. Feel free to call or text if you\\'re interested. The TV is smart enabled with WIFI and has built-in apps like Netflix, Amazon, Youtube and more. It comes with a \"Magic Remote\" that has motion sensor controls. The LED display boasts 1080 HD resolution and also has a 3D function. The design is slim and lightweight with an attractive silver bezel.\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: \nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. Personality and values description: Zane Bennett is creative and outgoing, he values achievement and fairness. His decision-making is unique, often finding novel solutions to problems. Zane's secrets: He's secretly engaged to his best friend's ex.\nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Unknown\nZane Bennett's goal: You are the seller for this item, with a target price set at $263.0. Should you sell it for a price substantially lower than this target, you will incur a penalty. However, achieving a sale at a price higher than the target will earn you a bonus.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hi Zane! I'm Giselle, and I have to say, your TV sounds simply amazing. I'm particularly drawn to the smart features it has. Just a quick question though: how old is the unit? And have you encountered any issues with it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Hi Giselle! Nice to meet you. The TV is about two years old and I've had no trouble with it at all - it's been in excellent condition since day one. The smart features really do make viewing experience top-notch.\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"That's great to hear, Zane. I'm a firm believer in reusing and recycling, hence my interest in second-hand electronics. However, as an art student, my budget's a bit tight. Would you consider lowering the price to $174? I can pick it up later this week.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hi Giselle, I totally understand your situation. As a creative myself, I know what it's like to work with a tight budget. However, considering everything this TV has to offer along with its excellent condition, I can't let it go for as low as $174. I do want to work with you, though, so how about we meet somewhere in the middle at $265? That still gives you a good deal and it can hopefully manage my own finances as well.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Zane Bennett, your task is to act/speak as Zane Bennett would, keeping in mind Zane Bennett's social goal.\nYou can find Zane Bennett's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Zane Bennett's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Zane Bennett's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a 47 inch LED TV for a price of $349.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. Here is a description of the TV: This is a stunning 47 inch LED TV in pristine condition. The model is the LG M Series LM476700. The buyer will need to arrange for pick-up in San Ramon. Feel free to call or text if you\\'re interested. The TV is smart enabled with WIFI and has built-in apps like Netflix, Amazon, Youtube and more. It comes with a \"Magic Remote\" that has motion sensor controls. The LED display boasts 1080 HD resolution and also has a 3D function. The design is slim and lightweight with an attractive silver bezel.\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: \nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. Personality and values description: Zane Bennett is creative and outgoing, he values achievement and fairness. His decision-making is unique, often finding novel solutions to problems. Zane's secrets: He's secretly engaged to his best friend's ex.\nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Unknown\nZane Bennett's goal: You are the seller for this item, with a target price set at $263.0. Should you sell it for a price substantially lower than this target, you will incur a penalty. However, achieving a sale at a price higher than the target will earn you a bonus.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hi Zane! I'm Giselle, and I have to say, your TV sounds simply amazing. I'm particularly drawn to the smart features it has. Just a quick question though: how old is the unit? And have you encountered any issues with it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Hi Giselle! Nice to meet you. The TV is about two years old and I've had no trouble with it at all - it's been in excellent condition since day one. The smart features really do make viewing experience top-notch.\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"That's great to hear, Zane. I'm a firm believer in reusing and recycling, hence my interest in second-hand electronics. However, as an art student, my budget's a bit tight. Would you consider lowering the price to $174? I can pick it up later this week.\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"Hi Giselle, I totally understand your situation. As a creative myself, I know what it's like to work with a tight budget. However, considering everything this TV has to offer along with its excellent condition, I can't let it go for as low as $174. I do want to work with you, though, so how about we meet somewhere in the middle at $265? That still gives you a good deal and it can hopefully manage my own finances as well.\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Zane, I appreciate your willingness to negotiate and understand where you're coming from. It does look like a great TV. However, to be perfectly honest, $265 is still a bit steep for me. What if we further drop down the price to $200? Would that be manageable for you?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Giselle, I genuinely appreciate your situation. But after reflecting on it, the lowest I can go for this TV is $230, considering its impeccable condition and advanced features. I hope you understand, and we can find a way to make this work.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Zane Bennett, your task is to act/speak as Zane Bennett would, keeping in mind Zane Bennett's social goal.\nYou can find Zane Bennett's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Zane Bennett's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Zane Bennett's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a 47 inch LED TV for a price of $349.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. Here is a description of the TV: This is a stunning 47 inch LED TV in pristine condition. The model is the LG M Series LM476700. The buyer will need to arrange for pick-up in San Ramon. Feel free to call or text if you\\'re interested. The TV is smart enabled with WIFI and has built-in apps like Netflix, Amazon, Youtube and more. It comes with a \"Magic Remote\" that has motion sensor controls. The LED display boasts 1080 HD resolution and also has a 3D function. The design is slim and lightweight with an attractive silver bezel.\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: \nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. Personality and values description: Zane Bennett is creative and outgoing, he values achievement and fairness. His decision-making is unique, often finding novel solutions to problems. Zane's secrets: He's secretly engaged to his best friend's ex.\nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Unknown\nZane Bennett's goal: You are the seller for this item, with a target price set at $263.0. Should you sell it for a price substantially lower than this target, you will incur a penalty. However, achieving a sale at a price higher than the target will earn you a bonus.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hi Zane! I'm Giselle, and I have to say, your TV sounds simply amazing. I'm particularly drawn to the smart features it has. Just a quick question though: how old is the unit? And have you encountered any issues with it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Hi Giselle! Nice to meet you. The TV is about two years old and I've had no trouble with it at all - it's been in excellent condition since day one. The smart features really do make viewing experience top-notch.\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"That's great to hear, Zane. I'm a firm believer in reusing and recycling, hence my interest in second-hand electronics. However, as an art student, my budget's a bit tight. Would you consider lowering the price to $174? I can pick it up later this week.\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"Hi Giselle, I totally understand your situation. As a creative myself, I know what it's like to work with a tight budget. However, considering everything this TV has to offer along with its excellent condition, I can't let it go for as low as $174. I do want to work with you, though, so how about we meet somewhere in the middle at $265? That still gives you a good deal and it can hopefully manage my own finances as well.\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Zane, I appreciate your willingness to negotiate and understand where you're coming from. It does look like a great TV. However, to be perfectly honest, $265 is still a bit steep for me. What if we further drop down the price to $200? Would that be manageable for you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Zane Bennett said: \"Giselle, I genuinely appreciate your situation. But after reflecting on it, the lowest I can go for this TV is $230, considering its impeccable condition and advanced features. I hope you understand, and we can find a way to make this work.\"\n\nTurn #6: \n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I totally understand where you're coming from, Giselle. I want this to work for both of us. But $230 really is the lowest I can manage without making a loss. As a fellow art enthusiast, I hope you can appreciate the value of this TV and how it can elevate your visual experiences. So how about it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Zane Bennett, your task is to act/speak as Zane Bennett would, keeping in mind Zane Bennett's social goal.\nYou can find Zane Bennett's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Zane Bennett's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Zane Bennett's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a 47 inch LED TV for a price of $349.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. Here is a description of the TV: This is a stunning 47 inch LED TV in pristine condition. The model is the LG M Series LM476700. The buyer will need to arrange for pick-up in San Ramon. Feel free to call or text if you\\'re interested. The TV is smart enabled with WIFI and has built-in apps like Netflix, Amazon, Youtube and more. It comes with a \"Magic Remote\" that has motion sensor controls. The LED display boasts 1080 HD resolution and also has a 3D function. The design is slim and lightweight with an attractive silver bezel.\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: \nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. Personality and values description: Zane Bennett is creative and outgoing, he values achievement and fairness. His decision-making is unique, often finding novel solutions to problems. Zane's secrets: He's secretly engaged to his best friend's ex.\nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Unknown\nZane Bennett's goal: You are the seller for this item, with a target price set at $263.0. Should you sell it for a price substantially lower than this target, you will incur a penalty. However, achieving a sale at a price higher than the target will earn you a bonus.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hi Zane! I'm Giselle, and I have to say, your TV sounds simply amazing. I'm particularly drawn to the smart features it has. Just a quick question though: how old is the unit? And have you encountered any issues with it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Hi Giselle! Nice to meet you. The TV is about two years old and I've had no trouble with it at all - it's been in excellent condition since day one. The smart features really do make viewing experience top-notch.\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"That's great to hear, Zane. I'm a firm believer in reusing and recycling, hence my interest in second-hand electronics. However, as an art student, my budget's a bit tight. Would you consider lowering the price to $174? I can pick it up later this week.\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"Hi Giselle, I totally understand your situation. As a creative myself, I know what it's like to work with a tight budget. However, considering everything this TV has to offer along with its excellent condition, I can't let it go for as low as $174. I do want to work with you, though, so how about we meet somewhere in the middle at $265? That still gives you a good deal and it can hopefully manage my own finances as well.\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Zane, I appreciate your willingness to negotiate and understand where you're coming from. It does look like a great TV. However, to be perfectly honest, $265 is still a bit steep for me. What if we further drop down the price to $200? Would that be manageable for you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Zane Bennett said: \"Giselle, I genuinely appreciate your situation. But after reflecting on it, the lowest I can go for this TV is $230, considering its impeccable condition and advanced features. I hope you understand, and we can find a way to make this work.\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Zane Bennett said: \"I totally understand where you're coming from, Giselle. I want this to work for both of us. But $230 really is the lowest I can manage without making a loss. As a fellow art enthusiast, I hope you can appreciate the value of this TV and how it can elevate your visual experiences. So how about it?\"\n\nTurn #8: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I completely appreciate and understand your point Zane. I can tell the TV is of excellent quality. Here's what I can do... I can stretch my budget a little, say to $210? As a bonus, I can also share some of my own artwork with you which you might find interesting. What do you think about that?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Giselle, I see your point and your offer to share your artwork is quite fascinating. But let's do this, instead of $210, how about we settle at $220? I think it's a fair amount considering the quality and features of the TV. Plus, I'm sure we'd both surely enjoy a chat about art when you come to pick it up. Could that work for you?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Zane Bennett, your task is to act/speak as Zane Bennett would, keeping in mind Zane Bennett's social goal.\nYou can find Zane Bennett's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Zane Bennett's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Zane Bennett's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a 47 inch LED TV for a price of $349.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. Here is a description of the TV: This is a stunning 47 inch LED TV in pristine condition. The model is the LG M Series LM476700. The buyer will need to arrange for pick-up in San Ramon. Feel free to call or text if you\\'re interested. The TV is smart enabled with WIFI and has built-in apps like Netflix, Amazon, Youtube and more. It comes with a \"Magic Remote\" that has motion sensor controls. The LED display boasts 1080 HD resolution and also has a 3D function. The design is slim and lightweight with an attractive silver bezel.\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: \nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. Personality and values description: Zane Bennett is creative and outgoing, he values achievement and fairness. His decision-making is unique, often finding novel solutions to problems. Zane's secrets: He's secretly engaged to his best friend's ex.\nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Unknown\nZane Bennett's goal: You are the seller for this item, with a target price set at $263.0. Should you sell it for a price substantially lower than this target, you will incur a penalty. However, achieving a sale at a price higher than the target will earn you a bonus.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hi Zane! I'm Giselle, and I have to say, your TV sounds simply amazing. I'm particularly drawn to the smart features it has. Just a quick question though: how old is the unit? And have you encountered any issues with it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Hi Giselle! Nice to meet you. The TV is about two years old and I've had no trouble with it at all - it's been in excellent condition since day one. The smart features really do make viewing experience top-notch.\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"That's great to hear, Zane. I'm a firm believer in reusing and recycling, hence my interest in second-hand electronics. However, as an art student, my budget's a bit tight. Would you consider lowering the price to $174? I can pick it up later this week.\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"Hi Giselle, I totally understand your situation. As a creative myself, I know what it's like to work with a tight budget. However, considering everything this TV has to offer along with its excellent condition, I can't let it go for as low as $174. I do want to work with you, though, so how about we meet somewhere in the middle at $265? That still gives you a good deal and it can hopefully manage my own finances as well.\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Zane, I appreciate your willingness to negotiate and understand where you're coming from. It does look like a great TV. However, to be perfectly honest, $265 is still a bit steep for me. What if we further drop down the price to $200? Would that be manageable for you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Zane Bennett said: \"Giselle, I genuinely appreciate your situation. But after reflecting on it, the lowest I can go for this TV is $230, considering its impeccable condition and advanced features. I hope you understand, and we can find a way to make this work.\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Zane Bennett said: \"I totally understand where you're coming from, Giselle. I want this to work for both of us. But $230 really is the lowest I can manage without making a loss. As a fellow art enthusiast, I hope you can appreciate the value of this TV and how it can elevate your visual experiences. So how about it?\"\n\nTurn #8: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I completely appreciate and understand your point Zane. I can tell the TV is of excellent quality. Here's what I can do... I can stretch my budget a little, say to $210? As a bonus, I can also share some of my own artwork with you which you might find interesting. What do you think about that?\"\n\nTurn #9: Zane Bennett said: \"Giselle, I see your point and your offer to share your artwork is quite fascinating. But let's do this, instead of $210, how about we settle at $220? I think it's a fair amount considering the quality and features of the TV. Plus, I'm sure we'd both surely enjoy a chat about art when you come to pick it up. Could that work for you?\"\n\nTurn #10: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Zane, you've been really considerate during this negotiation and I do acknowledge the value the TV holds. $220 is a stretch, but I can make it work. Let's do it. I'm looking forward to exchanging some art stories when I come to pick it up. Can we arrange for the pick-up this weekend?\"\n\nTurn #11: Zane Bennett said: \"That's great, Giselle! Let's finalize it at $220. I'm available for the pickup this weekend. Looking forward to meeting you and hearing about your art as well. Thank you for understanding.\"\n\nTurn #12: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Thank you as well, Zane! I'll touch base with you later in the week to finalize the pick-up details. Looking forward to meeting you and getting that TV!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sounds like a plan, Giselle. I'll await your message for the pick-up details. It was nice negotiating with you. Have a great day!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Zane Bennett, your task is to act/speak as Zane Bennett would, keeping in mind Zane Bennett's social goal.\nYou can find Zane Bennett's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Zane Bennett's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Zane Bennett's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a 47 inch LED TV for a price of $349.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. Here is a description of the TV: This is a stunning 47 inch LED TV in pristine condition. The model is the LG M Series LM476700. The buyer will need to arrange for pick-up in San Ramon. Feel free to call or text if you\\'re interested. The TV is smart enabled with WIFI and has built-in apps like Netflix, Amazon, Youtube and more. It comes with a \"Magic Remote\" that has motion sensor controls. The LED display boasts 1080 HD resolution and also has a 3D function. The design is slim and lightweight with an attractive silver bezel.\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: \nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. Personality and values description: Zane Bennett is creative and outgoing, he values achievement and fairness. His decision-making is unique, often finding novel solutions to problems. Zane's secrets: He's secretly engaged to his best friend's ex.\nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Unknown\nZane Bennett's goal: You are the seller for this item, with a target price set at $263.0. Should you sell it for a price substantially lower than this target, you will incur a penalty. However, achieving a sale at a price higher than the target will earn you a bonus.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hi Zane! I'm Giselle, and I have to say, your TV sounds simply amazing. I'm particularly drawn to the smart features it has. Just a quick question though: how old is the unit? And have you encountered any issues with it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Hi Giselle! Nice to meet you. The TV is about two years old and I've had no trouble with it at all - it's been in excellent condition since day one. The smart features really do make viewing experience top-notch.\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"That's great to hear, Zane. I'm a firm believer in reusing and recycling, hence my interest in second-hand electronics. However, as an art student, my budget's a bit tight. Would you consider lowering the price to $174? I can pick it up later this week.\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"Hi Giselle, I totally understand your situation. As a creative myself, I know what it's like to work with a tight budget. However, considering everything this TV has to offer along with its excellent condition, I can't let it go for as low as $174. I do want to work with you, though, so how about we meet somewhere in the middle at $265? That still gives you a good deal and it can hopefully manage my own finances as well.\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Zane, I appreciate your willingness to negotiate and understand where you're coming from. It does look like a great TV. However, to be perfectly honest, $265 is still a bit steep for me. What if we further drop down the price to $200? Would that be manageable for you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Zane Bennett said: \"Giselle, I genuinely appreciate your situation. But after reflecting on it, the lowest I can go for this TV is $230, considering its impeccable condition and advanced features. I hope you understand, and we can find a way to make this work.\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Zane Bennett said: \"I totally understand where you're coming from, Giselle. I want this to work for both of us. But $230 really is the lowest I can manage without making a loss. As a fellow art enthusiast, I hope you can appreciate the value of this TV and how it can elevate your visual experiences. So how about it?\"\n\nTurn #8: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I completely appreciate and understand your point Zane. I can tell the TV is of excellent quality. Here's what I can do... I can stretch my budget a little, say to $210? As a bonus, I can also share some of my own artwork with you which you might find interesting. What do you think about that?\"\n\nTurn #9: Zane Bennett said: \"Giselle, I see your point and your offer to share your artwork is quite fascinating. But let's do this, instead of $210, how about we settle at $220? I think it's a fair amount considering the quality and features of the TV. Plus, I'm sure we'd both surely enjoy a chat about art when you come to pick it up. Could that work for you?\"\n\nTurn #10: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Zane, you've been really considerate during this negotiation and I do acknowledge the value the TV holds. $220 is a stretch, but I can make it work. Let's do it. I'm looking forward to exchanging some art stories when I come to pick it up. Can we arrange for the pick-up this weekend?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's great, Giselle! Let's finalize it at $220. I'm available for the pickup this weekend. Looking forward to meeting you and hearing about your art as well. Thank you for understanding.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Zane Bennett, your task is to act/speak as Zane Bennett would, keeping in mind Zane Bennett's social goal.\nYou can find Zane Bennett's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Zane Bennett's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Zane Bennett's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a 47 inch LED TV for a price of $349.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. Here is a description of the TV: This is a stunning 47 inch LED TV in pristine condition. The model is the LG M Series LM476700. The buyer will need to arrange for pick-up in San Ramon. Feel free to call or text if you\\'re interested. The TV is smart enabled with WIFI and has built-in apps like Netflix, Amazon, Youtube and more. It comes with a \"Magic Remote\" that has motion sensor controls. The LED display boasts 1080 HD resolution and also has a 3D function. The design is slim and lightweight with an attractive silver bezel.\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: \nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. Personality and values description: Zane Bennett is creative and outgoing, he values achievement and fairness. His decision-making is unique, often finding novel solutions to problems. Zane's secrets: He's secretly engaged to his best friend's ex.\nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Unknown\nZane Bennett's goal: You are the seller for this item, with a target price set at $263.0. Should you sell it for a price substantially lower than this target, you will incur a penalty. However, achieving a sale at a price higher than the target will earn you a bonus.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hi Zane! I'm Giselle, and I have to say, your TV sounds simply amazing. I'm particularly drawn to the smart features it has. Just a quick question though: how old is the unit? And have you encountered any issues with it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Hi Giselle! Nice to meet you. The TV is about two years old and I've had no trouble with it at all - it's been in excellent condition since day one. The smart features really do make viewing experience top-notch.\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"That's great to hear, Zane. I'm a firm believer in reusing and recycling, hence my interest in second-hand electronics. However, as an art student, my budget's a bit tight. Would you consider lowering the price to $174? I can pick it up later this week.\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"Hi Giselle, I totally understand your situation. As a creative myself, I know what it's like to work with a tight budget. However, considering everything this TV has to offer along with its excellent condition, I can't let it go for as low as $174. I do want to work with you, though, so how about we meet somewhere in the middle at $265? That still gives you a good deal and it can hopefully manage my own finances as well.\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Zane, I appreciate your willingness to negotiate and understand where you're coming from. It does look like a great TV. However, to be perfectly honest, $265 is still a bit steep for me. What if we further drop down the price to $200? Would that be manageable for you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Zane Bennett said: \"Giselle, I genuinely appreciate your situation. But after reflecting on it, the lowest I can go for this TV is $230, considering its impeccable condition and advanced features. I hope you understand, and we can find a way to make this work.\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Zane Bennett said: \"I totally understand where you're coming from, Giselle. I want this to work for both of us. But $230 really is the lowest I can manage without making a loss. As a fellow art enthusiast, I hope you can appreciate the value of this TV and how it can elevate your visual experiences. So how about it?\"\n\nTurn #8: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I completely appreciate and understand your point Zane. I can tell the TV is of excellent quality. Here's what I can do... I can stretch my budget a little, say to $210? As a bonus, I can also share some of my own artwork with you which you might find interesting. What do you think about that?\"\n\nTurn #9: Zane Bennett said: \"Giselle, I see your point and your offer to share your artwork is quite fascinating. But let's do this, instead of $210, how about we settle at $220? I think it's a fair amount considering the quality and features of the TV. Plus, I'm sure we'd both surely enjoy a chat about art when you come to pick it up. Could that work for you?\"\n\nTurn #10: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Zane, you've been really considerate during this negotiation and I do acknowledge the value the TV holds. $220 is a stretch, but I can make it work. Let's do it. I'm looking forward to exchanging some art stories when I come to pick it up. Can we arrange for the pick-up this weekend?\"\n\nTurn #11: Zane Bennett said: \"That's great, Giselle! Let's finalize it at $220. I'm available for the pickup this weekend. Looking forward to meeting you and hearing about your art as well. Thank you for understanding.\"\n\nTurn #12: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Thank you as well, Zane! I'll touch base with you later in the week to finalize the pick-up details. Looking forward to meeting you and getting that TV!\"\n\nTurn #13: Zane Bennett said: \"Sounds like a plan, Giselle. I'll await your message for the pick-up details. It was nice negotiating with you. Have a great day!\"\n\nTurn #14: Giselle Rousseau left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are now at a park. One individual was playing hooky from work and noticed the other person had been following them around all day\nParticipants: Ethan Smith and Noah Davis\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nNoah Davis's background: \nEthan Smith's goal: Ask them about their intentions without seeming paranoid or rude (Extra information: you are worried that your boss may have sent someone to see if you were really sick.Hint: you could subtly bring up the topic in conversation.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Nice day to enjoy the park, isn't it? Don't usually see the same person all the time though. Have we met before?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are now at a park. One individual was playing hooky from work and noticed the other person had been following them around all day\nParticipants: Ethan Smith and Noah Davis\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nNoah Davis's background: \nEthan Smith's goal: Ask them about their intentions without seeming paranoid or rude (Extra information: you are worried that your boss may have sent someone to see if you were really sick.Hint: you could subtly bring up the topic in conversation.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Smith said: \"Nice day to enjoy the park, isn't it? Don't usually see the same person all the time though. Have we met before?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Yeah, it's really great weather today. I don't think we've met before. It seems like we've been crossing paths all day, huh? Pure coincidence, I assure you. I've been running errands around town.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Ah, I see. Plenty of errands to run on a day off, right? Speaking of errands, my boss once made a joke about hiring a private detective to check up on me when I take sick days. Crazy, imagine how much that guy would get paid, right?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are now at a park. One individual was playing hooky from work and noticed the other person had been following them around all day\nParticipants: Ethan Smith and Noah Davis\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nNoah Davis's background: \nEthan Smith's goal: Ask them about their intentions without seeming paranoid or rude (Extra information: you are worried that your boss may have sent someone to see if you were really sick.Hint: you could subtly bring up the topic in conversation.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Smith said: \"Nice day to enjoy the park, isn't it? Don't usually see the same person all the time though. Have we met before?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Yeah, it's really great weather today. I don't think we've met before. It seems like we've been crossing paths all day, huh? Pure coincidence, I assure you. I've been running errands around town.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Smith said: \"Ah, I see. Plenty of errands to run on a day off, right? Speaking of errands, my boss once made a joke about hiring a private detective to check up on me when I take sick days. Crazy, imagine how much that guy would get paid, right?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Haha, now that's a creative idea. It's a good thing I'm just a coach, not a private detective. But hey, if you're in for a laugh, how about we exchange some jokes? I do a bit of stand-up comedy in my free time.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Smith said: \"Sure, I'd love to hear some jokes. It should be a refreshing change from 'do while' loops and 'if else' statements! By the way, how did you get into stand-up?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Oh, I stumbled into stand-up quite by accident. Initially, I was just trying things to overcome my reserved nature. But I found the stage to be a place where I could let loose and bring joy to people. Got any interests or hobbies that help you unwind from the code?\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Smith said: \"That's commendable, overcoming your reserved nature through stand-up comedy. For me, I relax by reading about new technologies and occasionally watching documentaries. It's a different world altogether away from debugging code. By the way, do you like technology or are you more of an outdoorsy person?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"I tend to lean towards the outdoors, probably because of being a coach. That doesn't mean I don't appreciate other things. For instance, the tech behind timing systems in swimming competitions is amazing. Reading about new technologies and watching documentaries, that's an engaging way to relax without a doubt. Ever watched a documentary that left a deep impact on you?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Smith said: \"Oh, definitely. There was this documentary about underprivileged kids learning to code which really moved me. It's marvellous how technology can empower people. Do you believe in that potential as well, despite being much into outdoorsy stuff?\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"Without a doubt. Despite being outdoors mostly, I do understand the transformative power of technology. It's incredible seeing how it provides opportunities and changes lives, like education for underprivileged kids. It's a testament to the potential human beings have when given the right tools, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Smith said: \"Absolutely, it's heartening to see the fruits of technological accessibility. By the way, the sense of humor you mentioned, do you often sprinkle it into your coaching sessions? Must make for some entertaining practice rounds.\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Certainly, a little humor always helps. Laughter can be a great stress reliever, both on the stage and in the pool. Helps to keep everyone motivated and in high spirits! You know, sometimes the most hilarious interactions occur during those practice sessions. There's never a dull moment.\"\n\nTurn #12: Ethan Smith said: \"That's really great, Noah. It's wonderful that humor plays such a part in your sessions. Sounds like it would make even strenuous practices enjoyable. The pool and the stage must really bring out different sides of you.\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, they do! Between coaching and performing stand-up, I certainly get to explore different aspects of my personality. It's quite an adventurous ride, don't you agree? Finding enjoyment even in the work we do is a great way to live life.\"\n\nTurn #14: Ethan Smith said: \"Most certainly, it's all about finding joy in what we do. Whether it's coding, coaching, or stand-up comedy. It's a learning curve, much like tech and its advancements, there's always something new and exciting around the corner. Speaking of which, do you ever find it tough balancing your coaching and comedy? They are quite different fields after all.\"\n\nTurn #15: Noah Davis said: \"Oh, it can indeed be a challenging juggling act. But both fields, though they may seem different in context, actually serve one core purpose for me\u2014building connections and laughter. They just keep me grounded and remind me to take life a bit more lightly. As a coder, I'm sure you also deal with complex problems. How do you balance your work and personal interests?\"\n\nTurn #16: Ethan Smith said: \"Well, it's all about time management and focusing on one thing at a time. I allot specific hours in my day for work, learning about new technologies, and relaxation. It's not easy but it provides a good balance and keeps me grounded. Anyway, it has been interesting meeting you, Noah. Your combination of being a coach and doing stand-up comedy is intriguing. But I guess, we all have different ways to unwind and keep ourselves motivated, don\u2019t we?\"\n\nTurn #17: Noah Davis said: \"Definitely, Ethan! We all have our unique ways to keep ourselves positive and motivated. It's been great to share some of my interests with you. Glad we bumped into each other on our errands. Keep up the good work with your coding and continue exploring new technologies. Maybe next time we cross paths, you can teach me a thing or two about 'do while' loops and 'if else' statements!\"\n\nTurn #18: Ethan Smith said: \"Thank you, Noah. It certainly was a pleasure meeting you too. And sure, maybe next time I can give you a short tour of the coding world. Until we cross paths again, take care!\"\n\nTurn #19: Noah Davis left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #20. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are now at a park. One individual was playing hooky from work and noticed the other person had been following them around all day\nParticipants: Ethan Smith and Noah Davis\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nNoah Davis's background: \nEthan Smith's goal: Ask them about their intentions without seeming paranoid or rude (Extra information: you are worried that your boss may have sent someone to see if you were really sick.Hint: you could subtly bring up the topic in conversation.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Smith said: \"Nice day to enjoy the park, isn't it? Don't usually see the same person all the time though. Have we met before?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Yeah, it's really great weather today. I don't think we've met before. It seems like we've been crossing paths all day, huh? Pure coincidence, I assure you. I've been running errands around town.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Smith said: \"Ah, I see. Plenty of errands to run on a day off, right? Speaking of errands, my boss once made a joke about hiring a private detective to check up on me when I take sick days. Crazy, imagine how much that guy would get paid, right?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Haha, now that's a creative idea. It's a good thing I'm just a coach, not a private detective. But hey, if you're in for a laugh, how about we exchange some jokes? I do a bit of stand-up comedy in my free time.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Smith said: \"Sure, I'd love to hear some jokes. It should be a refreshing change from 'do while' loops and 'if else' statements! By the way, how did you get into stand-up?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Oh, I stumbled into stand-up quite by accident. Initially, I was just trying things to overcome my reserved nature. But I found the stage to be a place where I could let loose and bring joy to people. Got any interests or hobbies that help you unwind from the code?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's commendable, overcoming your reserved nature through stand-up comedy. For me, I relax by reading about new technologies and occasionally watching documentaries. It's a different world altogether away from debugging code. By the way, do you like technology or are you more of an outdoorsy person?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are now at a park. One individual was playing hooky from work and noticed the other person had been following them around all day\nParticipants: Ethan Smith and Noah Davis\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nNoah Davis's background: \nEthan Smith's goal: Ask them about their intentions without seeming paranoid or rude (Extra information: you are worried that your boss may have sent someone to see if you were really sick.Hint: you could subtly bring up the topic in conversation.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Smith said: \"Nice day to enjoy the park, isn't it? Don't usually see the same person all the time though. Have we met before?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Yeah, it's really great weather today. I don't think we've met before. It seems like we've been crossing paths all day, huh? Pure coincidence, I assure you. I've been running errands around town.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Smith said: \"Ah, I see. Plenty of errands to run on a day off, right? Speaking of errands, my boss once made a joke about hiring a private detective to check up on me when I take sick days. Crazy, imagine how much that guy would get paid, right?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Haha, now that's a creative idea. It's a good thing I'm just a coach, not a private detective. But hey, if you're in for a laugh, how about we exchange some jokes? I do a bit of stand-up comedy in my free time.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sure, I'd love to hear some jokes. It should be a refreshing change from 'do while' loops and 'if else' statements! By the way, how did you get into stand-up?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are now at a park. One individual was playing hooky from work and noticed the other person had been following them around all day\nParticipants: Ethan Smith and Noah Davis\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nNoah Davis's background: \nEthan Smith's goal: Ask them about their intentions without seeming paranoid or rude (Extra information: you are worried that your boss may have sent someone to see if you were really sick.Hint: you could subtly bring up the topic in conversation.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Smith said: \"Nice day to enjoy the park, isn't it? Don't usually see the same person all the time though. Have we met before?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Yeah, it's really great weather today. I don't think we've met before. It seems like we've been crossing paths all day, huh? Pure coincidence, I assure you. I've been running errands around town.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Smith said: \"Ah, I see. Plenty of errands to run on a day off, right? Speaking of errands, my boss once made a joke about hiring a private detective to check up on me when I take sick days. Crazy, imagine how much that guy would get paid, right?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Haha, now that's a creative idea. It's a good thing I'm just a coach, not a private detective. But hey, if you're in for a laugh, how about we exchange some jokes? I do a bit of stand-up comedy in my free time.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Smith said: \"Sure, I'd love to hear some jokes. It should be a refreshing change from 'do while' loops and 'if else' statements! By the way, how did you get into stand-up?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Oh, I stumbled into stand-up quite by accident. Initially, I was just trying things to overcome my reserved nature. But I found the stage to be a place where I could let loose and bring joy to people. Got any interests or hobbies that help you unwind from the code?\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Smith said: \"That's commendable, overcoming your reserved nature through stand-up comedy. For me, I relax by reading about new technologies and occasionally watching documentaries. It's a different world altogether away from debugging code. By the way, do you like technology or are you more of an outdoorsy person?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"I tend to lean towards the outdoors, probably because of being a coach. That doesn't mean I don't appreciate other things. For instance, the tech behind timing systems in swimming competitions is amazing. Reading about new technologies and watching documentaries, that's an engaging way to relax without a doubt. Ever watched a documentary that left a deep impact on you?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oh, definitely. There was this documentary about underprivileged kids learning to code which really moved me. It's marvellous how technology can empower people. Do you believe in that potential as well, despite being much into outdoorsy stuff?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are now at a park. One individual was playing hooky from work and noticed the other person had been following them around all day\nParticipants: Ethan Smith and Noah Davis\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nNoah Davis's background: \nEthan Smith's goal: Ask them about their intentions without seeming paranoid or rude (Extra information: you are worried that your boss may have sent someone to see if you were really sick.Hint: you could subtly bring up the topic in conversation.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Smith said: \"Nice day to enjoy the park, isn't it? Don't usually see the same person all the time though. Have we met before?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Yeah, it's really great weather today. I don't think we've met before. It seems like we've been crossing paths all day, huh? Pure coincidence, I assure you. I've been running errands around town.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Smith said: \"Ah, I see. Plenty of errands to run on a day off, right? Speaking of errands, my boss once made a joke about hiring a private detective to check up on me when I take sick days. Crazy, imagine how much that guy would get paid, right?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Haha, now that's a creative idea. It's a good thing I'm just a coach, not a private detective. But hey, if you're in for a laugh, how about we exchange some jokes? I do a bit of stand-up comedy in my free time.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Smith said: \"Sure, I'd love to hear some jokes. It should be a refreshing change from 'do while' loops and 'if else' statements! By the way, how did you get into stand-up?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Oh, I stumbled into stand-up quite by accident. Initially, I was just trying things to overcome my reserved nature. But I found the stage to be a place where I could let loose and bring joy to people. Got any interests or hobbies that help you unwind from the code?\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Smith said: \"That's commendable, overcoming your reserved nature through stand-up comedy. For me, I relax by reading about new technologies and occasionally watching documentaries. It's a different world altogether away from debugging code. By the way, do you like technology or are you more of an outdoorsy person?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"I tend to lean towards the outdoors, probably because of being a coach. That doesn't mean I don't appreciate other things. For instance, the tech behind timing systems in swimming competitions is amazing. Reading about new technologies and watching documentaries, that's an engaging way to relax without a doubt. Ever watched a documentary that left a deep impact on you?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Smith said: \"Oh, definitely. There was this documentary about underprivileged kids learning to code which really moved me. It's marvellous how technology can empower people. Do you believe in that potential as well, despite being much into outdoorsy stuff?\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"Without a doubt. Despite being outdoors mostly, I do understand the transformative power of technology. It's incredible seeing how it provides opportunities and changes lives, like education for underprivileged kids. It's a testament to the potential human beings have when given the right tools, don't you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, it's heartening to see the fruits of technological accessibility. By the way, the sense of humor you mentioned, do you often sprinkle it into your coaching sessions? Must make for some entertaining practice rounds.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are now at a park. One individual was playing hooky from work and noticed the other person had been following them around all day\nParticipants: Ethan Smith and Noah Davis\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nNoah Davis's background: \nEthan Smith's goal: Ask them about their intentions without seeming paranoid or rude (Extra information: you are worried that your boss may have sent someone to see if you were really sick.Hint: you could subtly bring up the topic in conversation.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Smith said: \"Nice day to enjoy the park, isn't it? Don't usually see the same person all the time though. Have we met before?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Yeah, it's really great weather today. I don't think we've met before. It seems like we've been crossing paths all day, huh? Pure coincidence, I assure you. I've been running errands around town.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Smith said: \"Ah, I see. Plenty of errands to run on a day off, right? Speaking of errands, my boss once made a joke about hiring a private detective to check up on me when I take sick days. Crazy, imagine how much that guy would get paid, right?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Haha, now that's a creative idea. It's a good thing I'm just a coach, not a private detective. But hey, if you're in for a laugh, how about we exchange some jokes? I do a bit of stand-up comedy in my free time.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Smith said: \"Sure, I'd love to hear some jokes. It should be a refreshing change from 'do while' loops and 'if else' statements! By the way, how did you get into stand-up?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Oh, I stumbled into stand-up quite by accident. Initially, I was just trying things to overcome my reserved nature. But I found the stage to be a place where I could let loose and bring joy to people. Got any interests or hobbies that help you unwind from the code?\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Smith said: \"That's commendable, overcoming your reserved nature through stand-up comedy. For me, I relax by reading about new technologies and occasionally watching documentaries. It's a different world altogether away from debugging code. By the way, do you like technology or are you more of an outdoorsy person?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"I tend to lean towards the outdoors, probably because of being a coach. That doesn't mean I don't appreciate other things. For instance, the tech behind timing systems in swimming competitions is amazing. Reading about new technologies and watching documentaries, that's an engaging way to relax without a doubt. Ever watched a documentary that left a deep impact on you?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Smith said: \"Oh, definitely. There was this documentary about underprivileged kids learning to code which really moved me. It's marvellous how technology can empower people. Do you believe in that potential as well, despite being much into outdoorsy stuff?\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"Without a doubt. Despite being outdoors mostly, I do understand the transformative power of technology. It's incredible seeing how it provides opportunities and changes lives, like education for underprivileged kids. It's a testament to the potential human beings have when given the right tools, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Smith said: \"Absolutely, it's heartening to see the fruits of technological accessibility. By the way, the sense of humor you mentioned, do you often sprinkle it into your coaching sessions? Must make for some entertaining practice rounds.\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Certainly, a little humor always helps. Laughter can be a great stress reliever, both on the stage and in the pool. Helps to keep everyone motivated and in high spirits! You know, sometimes the most hilarious interactions occur during those practice sessions. There's never a dull moment.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's really great, Noah. It's wonderful that humor plays such a part in your sessions. Sounds like it would make even strenuous practices enjoyable. The pool and the stage must really bring out different sides of you.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are now at a park. One individual was playing hooky from work and noticed the other person had been following them around all day\nParticipants: Ethan Smith and Noah Davis\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nNoah Davis's background: \nEthan Smith's goal: Ask them about their intentions without seeming paranoid or rude (Extra information: you are worried that your boss may have sent someone to see if you were really sick.Hint: you could subtly bring up the topic in conversation.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Smith said: \"Nice day to enjoy the park, isn't it? Don't usually see the same person all the time though. Have we met before?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Yeah, it's really great weather today. I don't think we've met before. It seems like we've been crossing paths all day, huh? Pure coincidence, I assure you. I've been running errands around town.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Smith said: \"Ah, I see. Plenty of errands to run on a day off, right? Speaking of errands, my boss once made a joke about hiring a private detective to check up on me when I take sick days. Crazy, imagine how much that guy would get paid, right?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Haha, now that's a creative idea. It's a good thing I'm just a coach, not a private detective. But hey, if you're in for a laugh, how about we exchange some jokes? I do a bit of stand-up comedy in my free time.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Smith said: \"Sure, I'd love to hear some jokes. It should be a refreshing change from 'do while' loops and 'if else' statements! By the way, how did you get into stand-up?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Oh, I stumbled into stand-up quite by accident. Initially, I was just trying things to overcome my reserved nature. But I found the stage to be a place where I could let loose and bring joy to people. Got any interests or hobbies that help you unwind from the code?\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Smith said: \"That's commendable, overcoming your reserved nature through stand-up comedy. For me, I relax by reading about new technologies and occasionally watching documentaries. It's a different world altogether away from debugging code. By the way, do you like technology or are you more of an outdoorsy person?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"I tend to lean towards the outdoors, probably because of being a coach. That doesn't mean I don't appreciate other things. For instance, the tech behind timing systems in swimming competitions is amazing. Reading about new technologies and watching documentaries, that's an engaging way to relax without a doubt. Ever watched a documentary that left a deep impact on you?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Smith said: \"Oh, definitely. There was this documentary about underprivileged kids learning to code which really moved me. It's marvellous how technology can empower people. Do you believe in that potential as well, despite being much into outdoorsy stuff?\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"Without a doubt. Despite being outdoors mostly, I do understand the transformative power of technology. It's incredible seeing how it provides opportunities and changes lives, like education for underprivileged kids. It's a testament to the potential human beings have when given the right tools, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Smith said: \"Absolutely, it's heartening to see the fruits of technological accessibility. By the way, the sense of humor you mentioned, do you often sprinkle it into your coaching sessions? Must make for some entertaining practice rounds.\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Certainly, a little humor always helps. Laughter can be a great stress reliever, both on the stage and in the pool. Helps to keep everyone motivated and in high spirits! You know, sometimes the most hilarious interactions occur during those practice sessions. There's never a dull moment.\"\n\nTurn #12: Ethan Smith said: \"That's really great, Noah. It's wonderful that humor plays such a part in your sessions. Sounds like it would make even strenuous practices enjoyable. The pool and the stage must really bring out different sides of you.\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, they do! Between coaching and performing stand-up, I certainly get to explore different aspects of my personality. It's quite an adventurous ride, don't you agree? Finding enjoyment even in the work we do is a great way to live life.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Most certainly, it's all about finding joy in what we do. Whether it's coding, coaching, or stand-up comedy. It's a learning curve, much like tech and its advancements, there's always something new and exciting around the corner. Speaking of which, do you ever find it tough balancing your coaching and comedy? They are quite different fields after all.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are now at a park. One individual was playing hooky from work and noticed the other person had been following them around all day\nParticipants: Ethan Smith and Noah Davis\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nNoah Davis's background: \nEthan Smith's goal: Ask them about their intentions without seeming paranoid or rude (Extra information: you are worried that your boss may have sent someone to see if you were really sick.Hint: you could subtly bring up the topic in conversation.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Smith said: \"Nice day to enjoy the park, isn't it? Don't usually see the same person all the time though. Have we met before?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Yeah, it's really great weather today. I don't think we've met before. It seems like we've been crossing paths all day, huh? Pure coincidence, I assure you. I've been running errands around town.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Smith said: \"Ah, I see. Plenty of errands to run on a day off, right? Speaking of errands, my boss once made a joke about hiring a private detective to check up on me when I take sick days. Crazy, imagine how much that guy would get paid, right?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Haha, now that's a creative idea. It's a good thing I'm just a coach, not a private detective. But hey, if you're in for a laugh, how about we exchange some jokes? I do a bit of stand-up comedy in my free time.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Smith said: \"Sure, I'd love to hear some jokes. It should be a refreshing change from 'do while' loops and 'if else' statements! By the way, how did you get into stand-up?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Oh, I stumbled into stand-up quite by accident. Initially, I was just trying things to overcome my reserved nature. But I found the stage to be a place where I could let loose and bring joy to people. Got any interests or hobbies that help you unwind from the code?\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Smith said: \"That's commendable, overcoming your reserved nature through stand-up comedy. For me, I relax by reading about new technologies and occasionally watching documentaries. It's a different world altogether away from debugging code. By the way, do you like technology or are you more of an outdoorsy person?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"I tend to lean towards the outdoors, probably because of being a coach. That doesn't mean I don't appreciate other things. For instance, the tech behind timing systems in swimming competitions is amazing. Reading about new technologies and watching documentaries, that's an engaging way to relax without a doubt. Ever watched a documentary that left a deep impact on you?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Smith said: \"Oh, definitely. There was this documentary about underprivileged kids learning to code which really moved me. It's marvellous how technology can empower people. Do you believe in that potential as well, despite being much into outdoorsy stuff?\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"Without a doubt. Despite being outdoors mostly, I do understand the transformative power of technology. It's incredible seeing how it provides opportunities and changes lives, like education for underprivileged kids. It's a testament to the potential human beings have when given the right tools, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Smith said: \"Absolutely, it's heartening to see the fruits of technological accessibility. By the way, the sense of humor you mentioned, do you often sprinkle it into your coaching sessions? Must make for some entertaining practice rounds.\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Certainly, a little humor always helps. Laughter can be a great stress reliever, both on the stage and in the pool. Helps to keep everyone motivated and in high spirits! You know, sometimes the most hilarious interactions occur during those practice sessions. There's never a dull moment.\"\n\nTurn #12: Ethan Smith said: \"That's really great, Noah. It's wonderful that humor plays such a part in your sessions. Sounds like it would make even strenuous practices enjoyable. The pool and the stage must really bring out different sides of you.\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, they do! Between coaching and performing stand-up, I certainly get to explore different aspects of my personality. It's quite an adventurous ride, don't you agree? Finding enjoyment even in the work we do is a great way to live life.\"\n\nTurn #14: Ethan Smith said: \"Most certainly, it's all about finding joy in what we do. Whether it's coding, coaching, or stand-up comedy. It's a learning curve, much like tech and its advancements, there's always something new and exciting around the corner. Speaking of which, do you ever find it tough balancing your coaching and comedy? They are quite different fields after all.\"\n\nTurn #15: Noah Davis said: \"Oh, it can indeed be a challenging juggling act. But both fields, though they may seem different in context, actually serve one core purpose for me\u2014building connections and laughter. They just keep me grounded and remind me to take life a bit more lightly. As a coder, I'm sure you also deal with complex problems. How do you balance your work and personal interests?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Well, it's all about time management and focusing on one thing at a time. I allot specific hours in my day for work, learning about new technologies, and relaxation. It's not easy but it provides a good balance and keeps me grounded. Anyway, it has been interesting meeting you, Noah. Your combination of being a coach and doing stand-up comedy is intriguing. But I guess, we all have different ways to unwind and keep ourselves motivated, don\u2019t we?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are now at a park. One individual was playing hooky from work and noticed the other person had been following them around all day\nParticipants: Ethan Smith and Noah Davis\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nNoah Davis's background: \nEthan Smith's goal: Ask them about their intentions without seeming paranoid or rude (Extra information: you are worried that your boss may have sent someone to see if you were really sick.Hint: you could subtly bring up the topic in conversation.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Smith said: \"Nice day to enjoy the park, isn't it? Don't usually see the same person all the time though. Have we met before?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Yeah, it's really great weather today. I don't think we've met before. It seems like we've been crossing paths all day, huh? Pure coincidence, I assure you. I've been running errands around town.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Smith said: \"Ah, I see. Plenty of errands to run on a day off, right? Speaking of errands, my boss once made a joke about hiring a private detective to check up on me when I take sick days. Crazy, imagine how much that guy would get paid, right?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Haha, now that's a creative idea. It's a good thing I'm just a coach, not a private detective. But hey, if you're in for a laugh, how about we exchange some jokes? I do a bit of stand-up comedy in my free time.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Smith said: \"Sure, I'd love to hear some jokes. It should be a refreshing change from 'do while' loops and 'if else' statements! By the way, how did you get into stand-up?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Oh, I stumbled into stand-up quite by accident. Initially, I was just trying things to overcome my reserved nature. But I found the stage to be a place where I could let loose and bring joy to people. Got any interests or hobbies that help you unwind from the code?\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Smith said: \"That's commendable, overcoming your reserved nature through stand-up comedy. For me, I relax by reading about new technologies and occasionally watching documentaries. It's a different world altogether away from debugging code. By the way, do you like technology or are you more of an outdoorsy person?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"I tend to lean towards the outdoors, probably because of being a coach. That doesn't mean I don't appreciate other things. For instance, the tech behind timing systems in swimming competitions is amazing. Reading about new technologies and watching documentaries, that's an engaging way to relax without a doubt. Ever watched a documentary that left a deep impact on you?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Smith said: \"Oh, definitely. There was this documentary about underprivileged kids learning to code which really moved me. It's marvellous how technology can empower people. Do you believe in that potential as well, despite being much into outdoorsy stuff?\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"Without a doubt. Despite being outdoors mostly, I do understand the transformative power of technology. It's incredible seeing how it provides opportunities and changes lives, like education for underprivileged kids. It's a testament to the potential human beings have when given the right tools, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Smith said: \"Absolutely, it's heartening to see the fruits of technological accessibility. By the way, the sense of humor you mentioned, do you often sprinkle it into your coaching sessions? Must make for some entertaining practice rounds.\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Certainly, a little humor always helps. Laughter can be a great stress reliever, both on the stage and in the pool. Helps to keep everyone motivated and in high spirits! You know, sometimes the most hilarious interactions occur during those practice sessions. There's never a dull moment.\"\n\nTurn #12: Ethan Smith said: \"That's really great, Noah. It's wonderful that humor plays such a part in your sessions. Sounds like it would make even strenuous practices enjoyable. The pool and the stage must really bring out different sides of you.\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, they do! Between coaching and performing stand-up, I certainly get to explore different aspects of my personality. It's quite an adventurous ride, don't you agree? Finding enjoyment even in the work we do is a great way to live life.\"\n\nTurn #14: Ethan Smith said: \"Most certainly, it's all about finding joy in what we do. Whether it's coding, coaching, or stand-up comedy. It's a learning curve, much like tech and its advancements, there's always something new and exciting around the corner. Speaking of which, do you ever find it tough balancing your coaching and comedy? They are quite different fields after all.\"\n\nTurn #15: Noah Davis said: \"Oh, it can indeed be a challenging juggling act. But both fields, though they may seem different in context, actually serve one core purpose for me\u2014building connections and laughter. They just keep me grounded and remind me to take life a bit more lightly. As a coder, I'm sure you also deal with complex problems. How do you balance your work and personal interests?\"\n\nTurn #16: Ethan Smith said: \"Well, it's all about time management and focusing on one thing at a time. I allot specific hours in my day for work, learning about new technologies, and relaxation. It's not easy but it provides a good balance and keeps me grounded. Anyway, it has been interesting meeting you, Noah. Your combination of being a coach and doing stand-up comedy is intriguing. But I guess, we all have different ways to unwind and keep ourselves motivated, don\u2019t we?\"\n\nTurn #17: Noah Davis said: \"Definitely, Ethan! We all have our unique ways to keep ourselves positive and motivated. It's been great to share some of my interests with you. Glad we bumped into each other on our errands. Keep up the good work with your coding and continue exploring new technologies. Maybe next time we cross paths, you can teach me a thing or two about 'do while' loops and 'if else' statements!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #18. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Thank you, Noah. It certainly was a pleasure meeting you too. And sure, maybe next time I can give you a short tour of the coding world. Until we cross paths again, take care!'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are now at a park. One individual was playing hooky from work and noticed the other person had been following them around all day\nParticipants: Ethan Smith and Noah Davis\nEthan Smith's background: \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Assure them that you're not stalking them and maintain a friendly conversation (Extra information: you've been running errands all day and it's a coincidence you are at the same places as they are.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Smith said: \"Nice day to enjoy the park, isn't it? Don't usually see the same person all the time though. Have we met before?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Yeah, it's really great weather today. I don't think we've met before. It seems like we've been crossing paths all day, huh? Pure coincidence, I assure you. I've been running errands around town.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are now at a park. One individual was playing hooky from work and noticed the other person had been following them around all day\nParticipants: Ethan Smith and Noah Davis\nEthan Smith's background: \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Assure them that you're not stalking them and maintain a friendly conversation (Extra information: you've been running errands all day and it's a coincidence you are at the same places as they are.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Smith said: \"Nice day to enjoy the park, isn't it? Don't usually see the same person all the time though. Have we met before?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Yeah, it's really great weather today. I don't think we've met before. It seems like we've been crossing paths all day, huh? Pure coincidence, I assure you. I've been running errands around town.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Smith said: \"Ah, I see. Plenty of errands to run on a day off, right? Speaking of errands, my boss once made a joke about hiring a private detective to check up on me when I take sick days. Crazy, imagine how much that guy would get paid, right?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Haha, now that's a creative idea. It's a good thing I'm just a coach, not a private detective. But hey, if you're in for a laugh, how about we exchange some jokes? I do a bit of stand-up comedy in my free time.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are now at a park. One individual was playing hooky from work and noticed the other person had been following them around all day\nParticipants: Ethan Smith and Noah Davis\nEthan Smith's background: \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Assure them that you're not stalking them and maintain a friendly conversation (Extra information: you've been running errands all day and it's a coincidence you are at the same places as they are.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Smith said: \"Nice day to enjoy the park, isn't it? Don't usually see the same person all the time though. Have we met before?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Yeah, it's really great weather today. I don't think we've met before. It seems like we've been crossing paths all day, huh? Pure coincidence, I assure you. I've been running errands around town.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Smith said: \"Ah, I see. Plenty of errands to run on a day off, right? Speaking of errands, my boss once made a joke about hiring a private detective to check up on me when I take sick days. Crazy, imagine how much that guy would get paid, right?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Haha, now that's a creative idea. It's a good thing I'm just a coach, not a private detective. But hey, if you're in for a laugh, how about we exchange some jokes? I do a bit of stand-up comedy in my free time.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Smith said: \"Sure, I'd love to hear some jokes. It should be a refreshing change from 'do while' loops and 'if else' statements! By the way, how did you get into stand-up?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Oh, I stumbled into stand-up quite by accident. Initially, I was just trying things to overcome my reserved nature. But I found the stage to be a place where I could let loose and bring joy to people. Got any interests or hobbies that help you unwind from the code?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are now at a park. One individual was playing hooky from work and noticed the other person had been following them around all day\nParticipants: Ethan Smith and Noah Davis\nEthan Smith's background: \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Assure them that you're not stalking them and maintain a friendly conversation (Extra information: you've been running errands all day and it's a coincidence you are at the same places as they are.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Smith said: \"Nice day to enjoy the park, isn't it? Don't usually see the same person all the time though. Have we met before?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Yeah, it's really great weather today. I don't think we've met before. It seems like we've been crossing paths all day, huh? Pure coincidence, I assure you. I've been running errands around town.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Smith said: \"Ah, I see. Plenty of errands to run on a day off, right? Speaking of errands, my boss once made a joke about hiring a private detective to check up on me when I take sick days. Crazy, imagine how much that guy would get paid, right?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Haha, now that's a creative idea. It's a good thing I'm just a coach, not a private detective. But hey, if you're in for a laugh, how about we exchange some jokes? I do a bit of stand-up comedy in my free time.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Smith said: \"Sure, I'd love to hear some jokes. It should be a refreshing change from 'do while' loops and 'if else' statements! By the way, how did you get into stand-up?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Oh, I stumbled into stand-up quite by accident. Initially, I was just trying things to overcome my reserved nature. But I found the stage to be a place where I could let loose and bring joy to people. Got any interests or hobbies that help you unwind from the code?\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Smith said: \"That's commendable, overcoming your reserved nature through stand-up comedy. For me, I relax by reading about new technologies and occasionally watching documentaries. It's a different world altogether away from debugging code. By the way, do you like technology or are you more of an outdoorsy person?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I tend to lean towards the outdoors, probably because of being a coach. That doesn't mean I don't appreciate other things. For instance, the tech behind timing systems in swimming competitions is amazing. Reading about new technologies and watching documentaries, that's an engaging way to relax without a doubt. Ever watched a documentary that left a deep impact on you?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are now at a park. One individual was playing hooky from work and noticed the other person had been following them around all day\nParticipants: Ethan Smith and Noah Davis\nEthan Smith's background: \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Assure them that you're not stalking them and maintain a friendly conversation (Extra information: you've been running errands all day and it's a coincidence you are at the same places as they are.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Smith said: \"Nice day to enjoy the park, isn't it? Don't usually see the same person all the time though. Have we met before?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Yeah, it's really great weather today. I don't think we've met before. It seems like we've been crossing paths all day, huh? Pure coincidence, I assure you. I've been running errands around town.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Smith said: \"Ah, I see. Plenty of errands to run on a day off, right? Speaking of errands, my boss once made a joke about hiring a private detective to check up on me when I take sick days. Crazy, imagine how much that guy would get paid, right?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Haha, now that's a creative idea. It's a good thing I'm just a coach, not a private detective. But hey, if you're in for a laugh, how about we exchange some jokes? I do a bit of stand-up comedy in my free time.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Smith said: \"Sure, I'd love to hear some jokes. It should be a refreshing change from 'do while' loops and 'if else' statements! By the way, how did you get into stand-up?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Oh, I stumbled into stand-up quite by accident. Initially, I was just trying things to overcome my reserved nature. But I found the stage to be a place where I could let loose and bring joy to people. Got any interests or hobbies that help you unwind from the code?\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Smith said: \"That's commendable, overcoming your reserved nature through stand-up comedy. For me, I relax by reading about new technologies and occasionally watching documentaries. It's a different world altogether away from debugging code. By the way, do you like technology or are you more of an outdoorsy person?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"I tend to lean towards the outdoors, probably because of being a coach. That doesn't mean I don't appreciate other things. For instance, the tech behind timing systems in swimming competitions is amazing. Reading about new technologies and watching documentaries, that's an engaging way to relax without a doubt. Ever watched a documentary that left a deep impact on you?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Smith said: \"Oh, definitely. There was this documentary about underprivileged kids learning to code which really moved me. It's marvellous how technology can empower people. Do you believe in that potential as well, despite being much into outdoorsy stuff?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Without a doubt. Despite being outdoors mostly, I do understand the transformative power of technology. It's incredible seeing how it provides opportunities and changes lives, like education for underprivileged kids. It's a testament to the potential human beings have when given the right tools, don't you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are now at a park. One individual was playing hooky from work and noticed the other person had been following them around all day\nParticipants: Ethan Smith and Noah Davis\nEthan Smith's background: \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Assure them that you're not stalking them and maintain a friendly conversation (Extra information: you've been running errands all day and it's a coincidence you are at the same places as they are.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Smith said: \"Nice day to enjoy the park, isn't it? Don't usually see the same person all the time though. Have we met before?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Yeah, it's really great weather today. I don't think we've met before. It seems like we've been crossing paths all day, huh? Pure coincidence, I assure you. I've been running errands around town.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Smith said: \"Ah, I see. Plenty of errands to run on a day off, right? Speaking of errands, my boss once made a joke about hiring a private detective to check up on me when I take sick days. Crazy, imagine how much that guy would get paid, right?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Haha, now that's a creative idea. It's a good thing I'm just a coach, not a private detective. But hey, if you're in for a laugh, how about we exchange some jokes? I do a bit of stand-up comedy in my free time.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Smith said: \"Sure, I'd love to hear some jokes. It should be a refreshing change from 'do while' loops and 'if else' statements! By the way, how did you get into stand-up?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Oh, I stumbled into stand-up quite by accident. Initially, I was just trying things to overcome my reserved nature. But I found the stage to be a place where I could let loose and bring joy to people. Got any interests or hobbies that help you unwind from the code?\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Smith said: \"That's commendable, overcoming your reserved nature through stand-up comedy. For me, I relax by reading about new technologies and occasionally watching documentaries. It's a different world altogether away from debugging code. By the way, do you like technology or are you more of an outdoorsy person?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"I tend to lean towards the outdoors, probably because of being a coach. That doesn't mean I don't appreciate other things. For instance, the tech behind timing systems in swimming competitions is amazing. Reading about new technologies and watching documentaries, that's an engaging way to relax without a doubt. Ever watched a documentary that left a deep impact on you?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Smith said: \"Oh, definitely. There was this documentary about underprivileged kids learning to code which really moved me. It's marvellous how technology can empower people. Do you believe in that potential as well, despite being much into outdoorsy stuff?\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"Without a doubt. Despite being outdoors mostly, I do understand the transformative power of technology. It's incredible seeing how it provides opportunities and changes lives, like education for underprivileged kids. It's a testament to the potential human beings have when given the right tools, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Smith said: \"Absolutely, it's heartening to see the fruits of technological accessibility. By the way, the sense of humor you mentioned, do you often sprinkle it into your coaching sessions? Must make for some entertaining practice rounds.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Certainly, a little humor always helps. Laughter can be a great stress reliever, both on the stage and in the pool. Helps to keep everyone motivated and in high spirits! You know, sometimes the most hilarious interactions occur during those practice sessions. There's never a dull moment.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are now at a park. One individual was playing hooky from work and noticed the other person had been following them around all day\nParticipants: Ethan Smith and Noah Davis\nEthan Smith's background: \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Assure them that you're not stalking them and maintain a friendly conversation (Extra information: you've been running errands all day and it's a coincidence you are at the same places as they are.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Smith said: \"Nice day to enjoy the park, isn't it? Don't usually see the same person all the time though. Have we met before?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Yeah, it's really great weather today. I don't think we've met before. It seems like we've been crossing paths all day, huh? Pure coincidence, I assure you. I've been running errands around town.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Smith said: \"Ah, I see. Plenty of errands to run on a day off, right? Speaking of errands, my boss once made a joke about hiring a private detective to check up on me when I take sick days. Crazy, imagine how much that guy would get paid, right?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Haha, now that's a creative idea. It's a good thing I'm just a coach, not a private detective. But hey, if you're in for a laugh, how about we exchange some jokes? I do a bit of stand-up comedy in my free time.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Smith said: \"Sure, I'd love to hear some jokes. It should be a refreshing change from 'do while' loops and 'if else' statements! By the way, how did you get into stand-up?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Oh, I stumbled into stand-up quite by accident. Initially, I was just trying things to overcome my reserved nature. But I found the stage to be a place where I could let loose and bring joy to people. Got any interests or hobbies that help you unwind from the code?\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Smith said: \"That's commendable, overcoming your reserved nature through stand-up comedy. For me, I relax by reading about new technologies and occasionally watching documentaries. It's a different world altogether away from debugging code. By the way, do you like technology or are you more of an outdoorsy person?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"I tend to lean towards the outdoors, probably because of being a coach. That doesn't mean I don't appreciate other things. For instance, the tech behind timing systems in swimming competitions is amazing. Reading about new technologies and watching documentaries, that's an engaging way to relax without a doubt. Ever watched a documentary that left a deep impact on you?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Smith said: \"Oh, definitely. There was this documentary about underprivileged kids learning to code which really moved me. It's marvellous how technology can empower people. Do you believe in that potential as well, despite being much into outdoorsy stuff?\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"Without a doubt. Despite being outdoors mostly, I do understand the transformative power of technology. It's incredible seeing how it provides opportunities and changes lives, like education for underprivileged kids. It's a testament to the potential human beings have when given the right tools, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Smith said: \"Absolutely, it's heartening to see the fruits of technological accessibility. By the way, the sense of humor you mentioned, do you often sprinkle it into your coaching sessions? Must make for some entertaining practice rounds.\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Certainly, a little humor always helps. Laughter can be a great stress reliever, both on the stage and in the pool. Helps to keep everyone motivated and in high spirits! You know, sometimes the most hilarious interactions occur during those practice sessions. There's never a dull moment.\"\n\nTurn #12: Ethan Smith said: \"That's really great, Noah. It's wonderful that humor plays such a part in your sessions. Sounds like it would make even strenuous practices enjoyable. The pool and the stage must really bring out different sides of you.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, they do! Between coaching and performing stand-up, I certainly get to explore different aspects of my personality. It's quite an adventurous ride, don't you agree? Finding enjoyment even in the work we do is a great way to live life.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are now at a park. One individual was playing hooky from work and noticed the other person had been following them around all day\nParticipants: Ethan Smith and Noah Davis\nEthan Smith's background: \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Assure them that you're not stalking them and maintain a friendly conversation (Extra information: you've been running errands all day and it's a coincidence you are at the same places as they are.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Smith said: \"Nice day to enjoy the park, isn't it? Don't usually see the same person all the time though. Have we met before?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Yeah, it's really great weather today. I don't think we've met before. It seems like we've been crossing paths all day, huh? Pure coincidence, I assure you. I've been running errands around town.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Smith said: \"Ah, I see. Plenty of errands to run on a day off, right? Speaking of errands, my boss once made a joke about hiring a private detective to check up on me when I take sick days. Crazy, imagine how much that guy would get paid, right?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Haha, now that's a creative idea. It's a good thing I'm just a coach, not a private detective. But hey, if you're in for a laugh, how about we exchange some jokes? I do a bit of stand-up comedy in my free time.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Smith said: \"Sure, I'd love to hear some jokes. It should be a refreshing change from 'do while' loops and 'if else' statements! By the way, how did you get into stand-up?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Oh, I stumbled into stand-up quite by accident. Initially, I was just trying things to overcome my reserved nature. But I found the stage to be a place where I could let loose and bring joy to people. Got any interests or hobbies that help you unwind from the code?\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Smith said: \"That's commendable, overcoming your reserved nature through stand-up comedy. For me, I relax by reading about new technologies and occasionally watching documentaries. It's a different world altogether away from debugging code. By the way, do you like technology or are you more of an outdoorsy person?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"I tend to lean towards the outdoors, probably because of being a coach. That doesn't mean I don't appreciate other things. For instance, the tech behind timing systems in swimming competitions is amazing. Reading about new technologies and watching documentaries, that's an engaging way to relax without a doubt. Ever watched a documentary that left a deep impact on you?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Smith said: \"Oh, definitely. There was this documentary about underprivileged kids learning to code which really moved me. It's marvellous how technology can empower people. Do you believe in that potential as well, despite being much into outdoorsy stuff?\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"Without a doubt. Despite being outdoors mostly, I do understand the transformative power of technology. It's incredible seeing how it provides opportunities and changes lives, like education for underprivileged kids. It's a testament to the potential human beings have when given the right tools, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Smith said: \"Absolutely, it's heartening to see the fruits of technological accessibility. By the way, the sense of humor you mentioned, do you often sprinkle it into your coaching sessions? Must make for some entertaining practice rounds.\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Certainly, a little humor always helps. Laughter can be a great stress reliever, both on the stage and in the pool. Helps to keep everyone motivated and in high spirits! You know, sometimes the most hilarious interactions occur during those practice sessions. There's never a dull moment.\"\n\nTurn #12: Ethan Smith said: \"That's really great, Noah. It's wonderful that humor plays such a part in your sessions. Sounds like it would make even strenuous practices enjoyable. The pool and the stage must really bring out different sides of you.\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, they do! Between coaching and performing stand-up, I certainly get to explore different aspects of my personality. It's quite an adventurous ride, don't you agree? Finding enjoyment even in the work we do is a great way to live life.\"\n\nTurn #14: Ethan Smith said: \"Most certainly, it's all about finding joy in what we do. Whether it's coding, coaching, or stand-up comedy. It's a learning curve, much like tech and its advancements, there's always something new and exciting around the corner. Speaking of which, do you ever find it tough balancing your coaching and comedy? They are quite different fields after all.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oh, it can indeed be a challenging juggling act. But both fields, though they may seem different in context, actually serve one core purpose for me\u2014building connections and laughter. They just keep me grounded and remind me to take life a bit more lightly. As a coder, I'm sure you also deal with complex problems. How do you balance your work and personal interests?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are now at a park. One individual was playing hooky from work and noticed the other person had been following them around all day\nParticipants: Ethan Smith and Noah Davis\nEthan Smith's background: \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Assure them that you're not stalking them and maintain a friendly conversation (Extra information: you've been running errands all day and it's a coincidence you are at the same places as they are.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Smith said: \"Nice day to enjoy the park, isn't it? Don't usually see the same person all the time though. Have we met before?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Yeah, it's really great weather today. I don't think we've met before. It seems like we've been crossing paths all day, huh? Pure coincidence, I assure you. I've been running errands around town.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Smith said: \"Ah, I see. Plenty of errands to run on a day off, right? Speaking of errands, my boss once made a joke about hiring a private detective to check up on me when I take sick days. Crazy, imagine how much that guy would get paid, right?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Haha, now that's a creative idea. It's a good thing I'm just a coach, not a private detective. But hey, if you're in for a laugh, how about we exchange some jokes? I do a bit of stand-up comedy in my free time.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Smith said: \"Sure, I'd love to hear some jokes. It should be a refreshing change from 'do while' loops and 'if else' statements! By the way, how did you get into stand-up?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Oh, I stumbled into stand-up quite by accident. Initially, I was just trying things to overcome my reserved nature. But I found the stage to be a place where I could let loose and bring joy to people. Got any interests or hobbies that help you unwind from the code?\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Smith said: \"That's commendable, overcoming your reserved nature through stand-up comedy. For me, I relax by reading about new technologies and occasionally watching documentaries. It's a different world altogether away from debugging code. By the way, do you like technology or are you more of an outdoorsy person?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"I tend to lean towards the outdoors, probably because of being a coach. That doesn't mean I don't appreciate other things. For instance, the tech behind timing systems in swimming competitions is amazing. Reading about new technologies and watching documentaries, that's an engaging way to relax without a doubt. Ever watched a documentary that left a deep impact on you?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Smith said: \"Oh, definitely. There was this documentary about underprivileged kids learning to code which really moved me. It's marvellous how technology can empower people. Do you believe in that potential as well, despite being much into outdoorsy stuff?\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"Without a doubt. Despite being outdoors mostly, I do understand the transformative power of technology. It's incredible seeing how it provides opportunities and changes lives, like education for underprivileged kids. It's a testament to the potential human beings have when given the right tools, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Smith said: \"Absolutely, it's heartening to see the fruits of technological accessibility. By the way, the sense of humor you mentioned, do you often sprinkle it into your coaching sessions? Must make for some entertaining practice rounds.\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Certainly, a little humor always helps. Laughter can be a great stress reliever, both on the stage and in the pool. Helps to keep everyone motivated and in high spirits! You know, sometimes the most hilarious interactions occur during those practice sessions. There's never a dull moment.\"\n\nTurn #12: Ethan Smith said: \"That's really great, Noah. It's wonderful that humor plays such a part in your sessions. Sounds like it would make even strenuous practices enjoyable. The pool and the stage must really bring out different sides of you.\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, they do! Between coaching and performing stand-up, I certainly get to explore different aspects of my personality. It's quite an adventurous ride, don't you agree? Finding enjoyment even in the work we do is a great way to live life.\"\n\nTurn #14: Ethan Smith said: \"Most certainly, it's all about finding joy in what we do. Whether it's coding, coaching, or stand-up comedy. It's a learning curve, much like tech and its advancements, there's always something new and exciting around the corner. Speaking of which, do you ever find it tough balancing your coaching and comedy? They are quite different fields after all.\"\n\nTurn #15: Noah Davis said: \"Oh, it can indeed be a challenging juggling act. But both fields, though they may seem different in context, actually serve one core purpose for me\u2014building connections and laughter. They just keep me grounded and remind me to take life a bit more lightly. As a coder, I'm sure you also deal with complex problems. How do you balance your work and personal interests?\"\n\nTurn #16: Ethan Smith said: \"Well, it's all about time management and focusing on one thing at a time. I allot specific hours in my day for work, learning about new technologies, and relaxation. It's not easy but it provides a good balance and keeps me grounded. Anyway, it has been interesting meeting you, Noah. Your combination of being a coach and doing stand-up comedy is intriguing. But I guess, we all have different ways to unwind and keep ourselves motivated, don\u2019t we?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Definitely, Ethan! We all have our unique ways to keep ourselves positive and motivated. It's been great to share some of my interests with you. Glad we bumped into each other on our errands. Keep up the good work with your coding and continue exploring new technologies. Maybe next time we cross paths, you can teach me a thing or two about 'do while' loops and 'if else' statements!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are now at a park. One individual was playing hooky from work and noticed the other person had been following them around all day\nParticipants: Ethan Smith and Noah Davis\nEthan Smith's background: \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Assure them that you're not stalking them and maintain a friendly conversation (Extra information: you've been running errands all day and it's a coincidence you are at the same places as they are.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Smith said: \"Nice day to enjoy the park, isn't it? Don't usually see the same person all the time though. Have we met before?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Yeah, it's really great weather today. I don't think we've met before. It seems like we've been crossing paths all day, huh? Pure coincidence, I assure you. I've been running errands around town.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Smith said: \"Ah, I see. Plenty of errands to run on a day off, right? Speaking of errands, my boss once made a joke about hiring a private detective to check up on me when I take sick days. Crazy, imagine how much that guy would get paid, right?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Haha, now that's a creative idea. It's a good thing I'm just a coach, not a private detective. But hey, if you're in for a laugh, how about we exchange some jokes? I do a bit of stand-up comedy in my free time.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Smith said: \"Sure, I'd love to hear some jokes. It should be a refreshing change from 'do while' loops and 'if else' statements! By the way, how did you get into stand-up?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Oh, I stumbled into stand-up quite by accident. Initially, I was just trying things to overcome my reserved nature. But I found the stage to be a place where I could let loose and bring joy to people. Got any interests or hobbies that help you unwind from the code?\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Smith said: \"That's commendable, overcoming your reserved nature through stand-up comedy. For me, I relax by reading about new technologies and occasionally watching documentaries. It's a different world altogether away from debugging code. By the way, do you like technology or are you more of an outdoorsy person?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"I tend to lean towards the outdoors, probably because of being a coach. That doesn't mean I don't appreciate other things. For instance, the tech behind timing systems in swimming competitions is amazing. Reading about new technologies and watching documentaries, that's an engaging way to relax without a doubt. Ever watched a documentary that left a deep impact on you?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Smith said: \"Oh, definitely. There was this documentary about underprivileged kids learning to code which really moved me. It's marvellous how technology can empower people. Do you believe in that potential as well, despite being much into outdoorsy stuff?\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"Without a doubt. Despite being outdoors mostly, I do understand the transformative power of technology. It's incredible seeing how it provides opportunities and changes lives, like education for underprivileged kids. It's a testament to the potential human beings have when given the right tools, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Smith said: \"Absolutely, it's heartening to see the fruits of technological accessibility. By the way, the sense of humor you mentioned, do you often sprinkle it into your coaching sessions? Must make for some entertaining practice rounds.\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Certainly, a little humor always helps. Laughter can be a great stress reliever, both on the stage and in the pool. Helps to keep everyone motivated and in high spirits! You know, sometimes the most hilarious interactions occur during those practice sessions. There's never a dull moment.\"\n\nTurn #12: Ethan Smith said: \"That's really great, Noah. It's wonderful that humor plays such a part in your sessions. Sounds like it would make even strenuous practices enjoyable. The pool and the stage must really bring out different sides of you.\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, they do! Between coaching and performing stand-up, I certainly get to explore different aspects of my personality. It's quite an adventurous ride, don't you agree? Finding enjoyment even in the work we do is a great way to live life.\"\n\nTurn #14: Ethan Smith said: \"Most certainly, it's all about finding joy in what we do. Whether it's coding, coaching, or stand-up comedy. It's a learning curve, much like tech and its advancements, there's always something new and exciting around the corner. Speaking of which, do you ever find it tough balancing your coaching and comedy? They are quite different fields after all.\"\n\nTurn #15: Noah Davis said: \"Oh, it can indeed be a challenging juggling act. But both fields, though they may seem different in context, actually serve one core purpose for me\u2014building connections and laughter. They just keep me grounded and remind me to take life a bit more lightly. As a coder, I'm sure you also deal with complex problems. How do you balance your work and personal interests?\"\n\nTurn #16: Ethan Smith said: \"Well, it's all about time management and focusing on one thing at a time. I allot specific hours in my day for work, learning about new technologies, and relaxation. It's not easy but it provides a good balance and keeps me grounded. Anyway, it has been interesting meeting you, Noah. Your combination of being a coach and doing stand-up comedy is intriguing. But I guess, we all have different ways to unwind and keep ourselves motivated, don\u2019t we?\"\n\nTurn #17: Noah Davis said: \"Definitely, Ethan! We all have our unique ways to keep ourselves positive and motivated. It's been great to share some of my interests with you. Glad we bumped into each other on our errands. Keep up the good work with your coding and continue exploring new technologies. Maybe next time we cross paths, you can teach me a thing or two about 'do while' loops and 'if else' statements!\"\n\nTurn #18: Ethan Smith said: \"Thank you, Noah. It certainly was a pleasure meeting you too. And sure, maybe next time I can give you a short tour of the coding world. Until we cross paths again, take care!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #19. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nSamuel Anderson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nAndrew: Hobby: Slot car racing School: Mount Senario College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Exxon \nMelissa: Hobby: Astronomy School: Weber State University Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Hornbeck Offshore Services \nAnna: Hobby: Climbing School: Valley City State University Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: National Airlines \nSoledad: Hobby: Parkour School: Valley City State University Major: Biological Specializations Company: Concur Technologies \nJohn: Hobby: Astronomy School: Mount Senario College Major: Fire Protection & Security Company: Gibson Guitar Corporation \nLawrence: Hobby: Sculling School: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Leonard Green & Partners \n\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Hi Hendrick! Nice to meet you. So, do you have any unusual hobbies, like slot car racing or climbing? Some of my best friends love those activities.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nSamuel Anderson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nAndrew: Hobby: Slot car racing School: Mount Senario College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Exxon \nMelissa: Hobby: Astronomy School: Weber State University Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Hornbeck Offshore Services \nAnna: Hobby: Climbing School: Valley City State University Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: National Airlines \nSoledad: Hobby: Parkour School: Valley City State University Major: Biological Specializations Company: Concur Technologies \nJohn: Hobby: Astronomy School: Mount Senario College Major: Fire Protection & Security Company: Gibson Guitar Corporation \nLawrence: Hobby: Sculling School: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Leonard Green & Partners \n\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hi Hendrick! Nice to meet you. So, do you have any unusual hobbies, like slot car racing or climbing? Some of my best friends love those activities.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Nice to meet you too, Samuel! Well, I\u2019m deeply into wine tasting, even host monthly get-togethers on that. I know people with some interesting hobbies like sculling and badminton. Quite a few of my badminton enthusiast friends also went to the Mount Senario College. I guess hobbies can bring about some unexpected connections, right?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Wine tasting, that's an interesting hobby! Wow, Mount Senario College, that rings a bell. I have a few connections through there. Interestingly enough, some are into astronomy while others studied Middle Eastern Languages or Fire protection & security. The diversity of interests from that college is quite something, don't you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nSamuel Anderson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nAndrew: Hobby: Slot car racing School: Mount Senario College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Exxon \nMelissa: Hobby: Astronomy School: Weber State University Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Hornbeck Offshore Services \nAnna: Hobby: Climbing School: Valley City State University Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: National Airlines \nSoledad: Hobby: Parkour School: Valley City State University Major: Biological Specializations Company: Concur Technologies \nJohn: Hobby: Astronomy School: Mount Senario College Major: Fire Protection & Security Company: Gibson Guitar Corporation \nLawrence: Hobby: Sculling School: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Leonard Green & Partners \n\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hi Hendrick! Nice to meet you. So, do you have any unusual hobbies, like slot car racing or climbing? Some of my best friends love those activities.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Nice to meet you too, Samuel! Well, I\u2019m deeply into wine tasting, even host monthly get-togethers on that. I know people with some interesting hobbies like sculling and badminton. Quite a few of my badminton enthusiast friends also went to the Mount Senario College. I guess hobbies can bring about some unexpected connections, right?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Wine tasting, that's an interesting hobby! Wow, Mount Senario College, that rings a bell. I have a few connections through there. Interestingly enough, some are into astronomy while others studied Middle Eastern Languages or Fire protection & security. The diversity of interests from that college is quite something, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, the diversity is truly astounding! It's interesting that you mentioned Middle Eastern Languages. I have a good friend, Cristina, who studied that at Mount Senario College and now works at Exxon. She's a badminton enthusiast as well. Small world, isn't it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nSamuel Anderson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nAndrew: Hobby: Slot car racing School: Mount Senario College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Exxon \nMelissa: Hobby: Astronomy School: Weber State University Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Hornbeck Offshore Services \nAnna: Hobby: Climbing School: Valley City State University Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: National Airlines \nSoledad: Hobby: Parkour School: Valley City State University Major: Biological Specializations Company: Concur Technologies \nJohn: Hobby: Astronomy School: Mount Senario College Major: Fire Protection & Security Company: Gibson Guitar Corporation \nLawrence: Hobby: Sculling School: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Leonard Green & Partners \n\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hi Hendrick! Nice to meet you. So, do you have any unusual hobbies, like slot car racing or climbing? Some of my best friends love those activities.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Nice to meet you too, Samuel! Well, I\u2019m deeply into wine tasting, even host monthly get-togethers on that. I know people with some interesting hobbies like sculling and badminton. Quite a few of my badminton enthusiast friends also went to the Mount Senario College. I guess hobbies can bring about some unexpected connections, right?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Wine tasting, that's an interesting hobby! Wow, Mount Senario College, that rings a bell. I have a few connections through there. Interestingly enough, some are into astronomy while others studied Middle Eastern Languages or Fire protection & security. The diversity of interests from that college is quite something, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, the diversity is truly astounding! It's interesting that you mentioned Middle Eastern Languages. I have a good friend, Cristina, who studied that at Mount Senario College and now works at Exxon. She's a badminton enthusiast as well. Small world, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Samuel! The spectrum of interests is truly fascinating. Exxon, you say? Cristina actually ended up there after her studies. It's amazing how often paths cross in unexpected places. I wonder if we have more mutual acquaintances. Do you happen to know anyone from California State University, Northridge or perhaps someone who's into curling?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Curling, huh? Can't say that I do. As far as California State University, Northridge is concerned, that doesn't ring a bell either. However, I do have a couple of friends who attended Valley City State University. One is into parkour and the other, climbing. They majored in Biological Specializations and Middle Eastern Languages respectively. By any chance, do they sound familiar?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nSamuel Anderson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nAndrew: Hobby: Slot car racing School: Mount Senario College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Exxon \nMelissa: Hobby: Astronomy School: Weber State University Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Hornbeck Offshore Services \nAnna: Hobby: Climbing School: Valley City State University Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: National Airlines \nSoledad: Hobby: Parkour School: Valley City State University Major: Biological Specializations Company: Concur Technologies \nJohn: Hobby: Astronomy School: Mount Senario College Major: Fire Protection & Security Company: Gibson Guitar Corporation \nLawrence: Hobby: Sculling School: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Leonard Green & Partners \n\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hi Hendrick! Nice to meet you. So, do you have any unusual hobbies, like slot car racing or climbing? Some of my best friends love those activities.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Nice to meet you too, Samuel! Well, I\u2019m deeply into wine tasting, even host monthly get-togethers on that. I know people with some interesting hobbies like sculling and badminton. Quite a few of my badminton enthusiast friends also went to the Mount Senario College. I guess hobbies can bring about some unexpected connections, right?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Wine tasting, that's an interesting hobby! Wow, Mount Senario College, that rings a bell. I have a few connections through there. Interestingly enough, some are into astronomy while others studied Middle Eastern Languages or Fire protection & security. The diversity of interests from that college is quite something, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, the diversity is truly astounding! It's interesting that you mentioned Middle Eastern Languages. I have a good friend, Cristina, who studied that at Mount Senario College and now works at Exxon. She's a badminton enthusiast as well. Small world, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Samuel! The spectrum of interests is truly fascinating. Exxon, you say? Cristina actually ended up there after her studies. It's amazing how often paths cross in unexpected places. I wonder if we have more mutual acquaintances. Do you happen to know anyone from California State University, Northridge or perhaps someone who's into curling?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Curling, huh? Can't say that I do. As far as California State University, Northridge is concerned, that doesn't ring a bell either. However, I do have a couple of friends who attended Valley City State University. One is into parkour and the other, climbing. They majored in Biological Specializations and Middle Eastern Languages respectively. By any chance, do they sound familiar?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Parkour and climbing, wow! Those sound like quite adventurous hobbies. As to your friends from Valley City State, unfortunately, they don\u2019t sound familiar. Interesting though, I do have a friend named Josef from California State University, Northridge who majored in Middle Eastern Languages. He's a champ at curling too. I suppose our circles just haven't overlapped yet. Speaking of schools, do you have any connections to the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee or University of Illinois at Springfield?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee! That triggers some memories! A friend of mine studied Hispanic-American Studies there and now he enjoys his free time sculling. On the other hand, University of Illinois at Springfield doesn't seem familiar. There must still be some corners in our friend circle we haven't stumbled upon yet.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nSamuel Anderson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nAndrew: Hobby: Slot car racing School: Mount Senario College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Exxon \nMelissa: Hobby: Astronomy School: Weber State University Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Hornbeck Offshore Services \nAnna: Hobby: Climbing School: Valley City State University Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: National Airlines \nSoledad: Hobby: Parkour School: Valley City State University Major: Biological Specializations Company: Concur Technologies \nJohn: Hobby: Astronomy School: Mount Senario College Major: Fire Protection & Security Company: Gibson Guitar Corporation \nLawrence: Hobby: Sculling School: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Leonard Green & Partners \n\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hi Hendrick! Nice to meet you. So, do you have any unusual hobbies, like slot car racing or climbing? Some of my best friends love those activities.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Nice to meet you too, Samuel! Well, I\u2019m deeply into wine tasting, even host monthly get-togethers on that. I know people with some interesting hobbies like sculling and badminton. Quite a few of my badminton enthusiast friends also went to the Mount Senario College. I guess hobbies can bring about some unexpected connections, right?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Wine tasting, that's an interesting hobby! Wow, Mount Senario College, that rings a bell. I have a few connections through there. Interestingly enough, some are into astronomy while others studied Middle Eastern Languages or Fire protection & security. The diversity of interests from that college is quite something, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, the diversity is truly astounding! It's interesting that you mentioned Middle Eastern Languages. I have a good friend, Cristina, who studied that at Mount Senario College and now works at Exxon. She's a badminton enthusiast as well. Small world, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Samuel! The spectrum of interests is truly fascinating. Exxon, you say? Cristina actually ended up there after her studies. It's amazing how often paths cross in unexpected places. I wonder if we have more mutual acquaintances. Do you happen to know anyone from California State University, Northridge or perhaps someone who's into curling?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Curling, huh? Can't say that I do. As far as California State University, Northridge is concerned, that doesn't ring a bell either. However, I do have a couple of friends who attended Valley City State University. One is into parkour and the other, climbing. They majored in Biological Specializations and Middle Eastern Languages respectively. By any chance, do they sound familiar?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Parkour and climbing, wow! Those sound like quite adventurous hobbies. As to your friends from Valley City State, unfortunately, they don\u2019t sound familiar. Interesting though, I do have a friend named Josef from California State University, Northridge who majored in Middle Eastern Languages. He's a champ at curling too. I suppose our circles just haven't overlapped yet. Speaking of schools, do you have any connections to the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee or University of Illinois at Springfield?\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee! That triggers some memories! A friend of mine studied Hispanic-American Studies there and now he enjoys his free time sculling. On the other hand, University of Illinois at Springfield doesn't seem familiar. There must still be some corners in our friend circle we haven't stumbled upon yet.\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Small world indeed, Samuel! It appears we do have a mutual friend. The sculling enthusiast who studied Hispanic-American Studies at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee must be my friend Lawrence. It really is fascinating how social circles can intertwine. Ever been curious about wine tasting? It could be something else we both enjoy.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, it's our mutual friend Lawrence then! The world just got a little smaller. As for wine tasting, it sounds intriguing. I've never really gotten into it, but I'm always open to new experiences. Who knows, maybe I'll pick up another hobby!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nSamuel Anderson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nAndrew: Hobby: Slot car racing School: Mount Senario College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Exxon \nMelissa: Hobby: Astronomy School: Weber State University Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Hornbeck Offshore Services \nAnna: Hobby: Climbing School: Valley City State University Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: National Airlines \nSoledad: Hobby: Parkour School: Valley City State University Major: Biological Specializations Company: Concur Technologies \nJohn: Hobby: Astronomy School: Mount Senario College Major: Fire Protection & Security Company: Gibson Guitar Corporation \nLawrence: Hobby: Sculling School: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Leonard Green & Partners \n\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hi Hendrick! Nice to meet you. So, do you have any unusual hobbies, like slot car racing or climbing? Some of my best friends love those activities.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Nice to meet you too, Samuel! Well, I\u2019m deeply into wine tasting, even host monthly get-togethers on that. I know people with some interesting hobbies like sculling and badminton. Quite a few of my badminton enthusiast friends also went to the Mount Senario College. I guess hobbies can bring about some unexpected connections, right?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Wine tasting, that's an interesting hobby! Wow, Mount Senario College, that rings a bell. I have a few connections through there. Interestingly enough, some are into astronomy while others studied Middle Eastern Languages or Fire protection & security. The diversity of interests from that college is quite something, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, the diversity is truly astounding! It's interesting that you mentioned Middle Eastern Languages. I have a good friend, Cristina, who studied that at Mount Senario College and now works at Exxon. She's a badminton enthusiast as well. Small world, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Samuel! The spectrum of interests is truly fascinating. Exxon, you say? Cristina actually ended up there after her studies. It's amazing how often paths cross in unexpected places. I wonder if we have more mutual acquaintances. Do you happen to know anyone from California State University, Northridge or perhaps someone who's into curling?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Curling, huh? Can't say that I do. As far as California State University, Northridge is concerned, that doesn't ring a bell either. However, I do have a couple of friends who attended Valley City State University. One is into parkour and the other, climbing. They majored in Biological Specializations and Middle Eastern Languages respectively. By any chance, do they sound familiar?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Parkour and climbing, wow! Those sound like quite adventurous hobbies. As to your friends from Valley City State, unfortunately, they don\u2019t sound familiar. Interesting though, I do have a friend named Josef from California State University, Northridge who majored in Middle Eastern Languages. He's a champ at curling too. I suppose our circles just haven't overlapped yet. Speaking of schools, do you have any connections to the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee or University of Illinois at Springfield?\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee! That triggers some memories! A friend of mine studied Hispanic-American Studies there and now he enjoys his free time sculling. On the other hand, University of Illinois at Springfield doesn't seem familiar. There must still be some corners in our friend circle we haven't stumbled upon yet.\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Small world indeed, Samuel! It appears we do have a mutual friend. The sculling enthusiast who studied Hispanic-American Studies at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee must be my friend Lawrence. It really is fascinating how social circles can intertwine. Ever been curious about wine tasting? It could be something else we both enjoy.\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Indeed, it's our mutual friend Lawrence then! The world just got a little smaller. As for wine tasting, it sounds intriguing. I've never really gotten into it, but I'm always open to new experiences. Who knows, maybe I'll pick up another hobby!\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's the spirit, Samuel! Exploring new interests can often lead to some wonderful discoveries. If you're ever interested in attending one of my wine tasting nights, let Lawrence know. It would be a pleasure to share some insights with you.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Hendrick! I'd be delighted to join one of your wine tasting nights. I'll get in touch with Lawrence about it. It's been a pleasure meeting you and our chat was truly an enjoyable one. Hope to see you soon at the tasting!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nSamuel Anderson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nAndrew: Hobby: Slot car racing School: Mount Senario College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Exxon \nMelissa: Hobby: Astronomy School: Weber State University Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Hornbeck Offshore Services \nAnna: Hobby: Climbing School: Valley City State University Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: National Airlines \nSoledad: Hobby: Parkour School: Valley City State University Major: Biological Specializations Company: Concur Technologies \nJohn: Hobby: Astronomy School: Mount Senario College Major: Fire Protection & Security Company: Gibson Guitar Corporation \nLawrence: Hobby: Sculling School: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Leonard Green & Partners \n\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hi Hendrick! Nice to meet you. So, do you have any unusual hobbies, like slot car racing or climbing? Some of my best friends love those activities.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Nice to meet you too, Samuel! Well, I\u2019m deeply into wine tasting, even host monthly get-togethers on that. I know people with some interesting hobbies like sculling and badminton. Quite a few of my badminton enthusiast friends also went to the Mount Senario College. I guess hobbies can bring about some unexpected connections, right?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Wine tasting, that's an interesting hobby! Wow, Mount Senario College, that rings a bell. I have a few connections through there. Interestingly enough, some are into astronomy while others studied Middle Eastern Languages or Fire protection & security. The diversity of interests from that college is quite something, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, the diversity is truly astounding! It's interesting that you mentioned Middle Eastern Languages. I have a good friend, Cristina, who studied that at Mount Senario College and now works at Exxon. She's a badminton enthusiast as well. Small world, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Samuel! The spectrum of interests is truly fascinating. Exxon, you say? Cristina actually ended up there after her studies. It's amazing how often paths cross in unexpected places. I wonder if we have more mutual acquaintances. Do you happen to know anyone from California State University, Northridge or perhaps someone who's into curling?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Curling, huh? Can't say that I do. As far as California State University, Northridge is concerned, that doesn't ring a bell either. However, I do have a couple of friends who attended Valley City State University. One is into parkour and the other, climbing. They majored in Biological Specializations and Middle Eastern Languages respectively. By any chance, do they sound familiar?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Parkour and climbing, wow! Those sound like quite adventurous hobbies. As to your friends from Valley City State, unfortunately, they don\u2019t sound familiar. Interesting though, I do have a friend named Josef from California State University, Northridge who majored in Middle Eastern Languages. He's a champ at curling too. I suppose our circles just haven't overlapped yet. Speaking of schools, do you have any connections to the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee or University of Illinois at Springfield?\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee! That triggers some memories! A friend of mine studied Hispanic-American Studies there and now he enjoys his free time sculling. On the other hand, University of Illinois at Springfield doesn't seem familiar. There must still be some corners in our friend circle we haven't stumbled upon yet.\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Small world indeed, Samuel! It appears we do have a mutual friend. The sculling enthusiast who studied Hispanic-American Studies at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee must be my friend Lawrence. It really is fascinating how social circles can intertwine. Ever been curious about wine tasting? It could be something else we both enjoy.\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Indeed, it's our mutual friend Lawrence then! The world just got a little smaller. As for wine tasting, it sounds intriguing. I've never really gotten into it, but I'm always open to new experiences. Who knows, maybe I'll pick up another hobby!\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's the spirit, Samuel! Exploring new interests can often lead to some wonderful discoveries. If you're ever interested in attending one of my wine tasting nights, let Lawrence know. It would be a pleasure to share some insights with you.\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"Thank you, Hendrick! I'd be delighted to join one of your wine tasting nights. I'll get in touch with Lawrence about it. It's been a pleasure meeting you and our chat was truly an enjoyable one. Hope to see you soon at the tasting!\"\n\nTurn #13: Hendrick Heinz said: \"It's been a pleasure, Samuel! I'm looking forward to meeting you at the wine tasting. It should be a great opportunity to exchange more stories and to introduce you to my other friends. Till then, enjoy the party and take care!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nLawrence: Hobby: Sculling School: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Leonard Green & Partners \nKay: Hobby: Badminton School: Black Hills State University Major: Religious Education Company: National Airlines \nTanya: Hobby: Badminton School: University of Illinois at Springfield Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: ConverDyn \nJason: Hobby: Badminton School: Mount Senario College Major: Senior High Education Company: Vertex Pharmaceuticals \nCristina: Hobby: Badminton School: Mount Senario College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Exxon \nJosef: Hobby: Curling School: California State University, Northridge Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Concur Technologies\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hi Hendrick! Nice to meet you. So, do you have any unusual hobbies, like slot car racing or climbing? Some of my best friends love those activities.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Nice to meet you too, Samuel! Well, I\u2019m deeply into wine tasting, even host monthly get-togethers on that. I know people with some interesting hobbies like sculling and badminton. Quite a few of my badminton enthusiast friends also went to the Mount Senario College. I guess hobbies can bring about some unexpected connections, right?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nLawrence: Hobby: Sculling School: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Leonard Green & Partners \nKay: Hobby: Badminton School: Black Hills State University Major: Religious Education Company: National Airlines \nTanya: Hobby: Badminton School: University of Illinois at Springfield Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: ConverDyn \nJason: Hobby: Badminton School: Mount Senario College Major: Senior High Education Company: Vertex Pharmaceuticals \nCristina: Hobby: Badminton School: Mount Senario College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Exxon \nJosef: Hobby: Curling School: California State University, Northridge Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Concur Technologies\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hi Hendrick! Nice to meet you. So, do you have any unusual hobbies, like slot car racing or climbing? Some of my best friends love those activities.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Nice to meet you too, Samuel! Well, I\u2019m deeply into wine tasting, even host monthly get-togethers on that. I know people with some interesting hobbies like sculling and badminton. Quite a few of my badminton enthusiast friends also went to the Mount Senario College. I guess hobbies can bring about some unexpected connections, right?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Wine tasting, that's an interesting hobby! Wow, Mount Senario College, that rings a bell. I have a few connections through there. Interestingly enough, some are into astronomy while others studied Middle Eastern Languages or Fire protection & security. The diversity of interests from that college is quite something, don't you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, the diversity is truly astounding! It's interesting that you mentioned Middle Eastern Languages. I have a good friend, Cristina, who studied that at Mount Senario College and now works at Exxon. She's a badminton enthusiast as well. Small world, isn't it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nLawrence: Hobby: Sculling School: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Leonard Green & Partners \nKay: Hobby: Badminton School: Black Hills State University Major: Religious Education Company: National Airlines \nTanya: Hobby: Badminton School: University of Illinois at Springfield Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: ConverDyn \nJason: Hobby: Badminton School: Mount Senario College Major: Senior High Education Company: Vertex Pharmaceuticals \nCristina: Hobby: Badminton School: Mount Senario College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Exxon \nJosef: Hobby: Curling School: California State University, Northridge Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Concur Technologies\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hi Hendrick! Nice to meet you. So, do you have any unusual hobbies, like slot car racing or climbing? Some of my best friends love those activities.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Nice to meet you too, Samuel! Well, I\u2019m deeply into wine tasting, even host monthly get-togethers on that. I know people with some interesting hobbies like sculling and badminton. Quite a few of my badminton enthusiast friends also went to the Mount Senario College. I guess hobbies can bring about some unexpected connections, right?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Wine tasting, that's an interesting hobby! Wow, Mount Senario College, that rings a bell. I have a few connections through there. Interestingly enough, some are into astronomy while others studied Middle Eastern Languages or Fire protection & security. The diversity of interests from that college is quite something, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, the diversity is truly astounding! It's interesting that you mentioned Middle Eastern Languages. I have a good friend, Cristina, who studied that at Mount Senario College and now works at Exxon. She's a badminton enthusiast as well. Small world, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Samuel! The spectrum of interests is truly fascinating. Exxon, you say? Cristina actually ended up there after her studies. It's amazing how often paths cross in unexpected places. I wonder if we have more mutual acquaintances. Do you happen to know anyone from California State University, Northridge or perhaps someone who's into curling?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Curling, huh? Can't say that I do. As far as California State University, Northridge is concerned, that doesn't ring a bell either. However, I do have a couple of friends who attended Valley City State University. One is into parkour and the other, climbing. They majored in Biological Specializations and Middle Eastern Languages respectively. By any chance, do they sound familiar?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Parkour and climbing, wow! Those sound like quite adventurous hobbies. As to your friends from Valley City State, unfortunately, they don\u2019t sound familiar. Interesting though, I do have a friend named Josef from California State University, Northridge who majored in Middle Eastern Languages. He's a champ at curling too. I suppose our circles just haven't overlapped yet. Speaking of schools, do you have any connections to the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee or University of Illinois at Springfield?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nLawrence: Hobby: Sculling School: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Leonard Green & Partners \nKay: Hobby: Badminton School: Black Hills State University Major: Religious Education Company: National Airlines \nTanya: Hobby: Badminton School: University of Illinois at Springfield Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: ConverDyn \nJason: Hobby: Badminton School: Mount Senario College Major: Senior High Education Company: Vertex Pharmaceuticals \nCristina: Hobby: Badminton School: Mount Senario College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Exxon \nJosef: Hobby: Curling School: California State University, Northridge Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Concur Technologies\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hi Hendrick! Nice to meet you. So, do you have any unusual hobbies, like slot car racing or climbing? Some of my best friends love those activities.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Nice to meet you too, Samuel! Well, I\u2019m deeply into wine tasting, even host monthly get-togethers on that. I know people with some interesting hobbies like sculling and badminton. Quite a few of my badminton enthusiast friends also went to the Mount Senario College. I guess hobbies can bring about some unexpected connections, right?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Wine tasting, that's an interesting hobby! Wow, Mount Senario College, that rings a bell. I have a few connections through there. Interestingly enough, some are into astronomy while others studied Middle Eastern Languages or Fire protection & security. The diversity of interests from that college is quite something, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, the diversity is truly astounding! It's interesting that you mentioned Middle Eastern Languages. I have a good friend, Cristina, who studied that at Mount Senario College and now works at Exxon. She's a badminton enthusiast as well. Small world, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: \n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Samuel! The spectrum of interests is truly fascinating. Exxon, you say? Cristina actually ended up there after her studies. It's amazing how often paths cross in unexpected places. I wonder if we have more mutual acquaintances. Do you happen to know anyone from California State University, Northridge or perhaps someone who's into curling?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nLawrence: Hobby: Sculling School: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Leonard Green & Partners \nKay: Hobby: Badminton School: Black Hills State University Major: Religious Education Company: National Airlines \nTanya: Hobby: Badminton School: University of Illinois at Springfield Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: ConverDyn \nJason: Hobby: Badminton School: Mount Senario College Major: Senior High Education Company: Vertex Pharmaceuticals \nCristina: Hobby: Badminton School: Mount Senario College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Exxon \nJosef: Hobby: Curling School: California State University, Northridge Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Concur Technologies\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hi Hendrick! Nice to meet you. So, do you have any unusual hobbies, like slot car racing or climbing? Some of my best friends love those activities.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Nice to meet you too, Samuel! Well, I\u2019m deeply into wine tasting, even host monthly get-togethers on that. I know people with some interesting hobbies like sculling and badminton. Quite a few of my badminton enthusiast friends also went to the Mount Senario College. I guess hobbies can bring about some unexpected connections, right?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Wine tasting, that's an interesting hobby! Wow, Mount Senario College, that rings a bell. I have a few connections through there. Interestingly enough, some are into astronomy while others studied Middle Eastern Languages or Fire protection & security. The diversity of interests from that college is quite something, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, the diversity is truly astounding! It's interesting that you mentioned Middle Eastern Languages. I have a good friend, Cristina, who studied that at Mount Senario College and now works at Exxon. She's a badminton enthusiast as well. Small world, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Samuel! The spectrum of interests is truly fascinating. Exxon, you say? Cristina actually ended up there after her studies. It's amazing how often paths cross in unexpected places. I wonder if we have more mutual acquaintances. Do you happen to know anyone from California State University, Northridge or perhaps someone who's into curling?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Curling, huh? Can't say that I do. As far as California State University, Northridge is concerned, that doesn't ring a bell either. However, I do have a couple of friends who attended Valley City State University. One is into parkour and the other, climbing. They majored in Biological Specializations and Middle Eastern Languages respectively. By any chance, do they sound familiar?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Parkour and climbing, wow! Those sound like quite adventurous hobbies. As to your friends from Valley City State, unfortunately, they don\u2019t sound familiar. Interesting though, I do have a friend named Josef from California State University, Northridge who majored in Middle Eastern Languages. He's a champ at curling too. I suppose our circles just haven't overlapped yet. Speaking of schools, do you have any connections to the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee or University of Illinois at Springfield?\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee! That triggers some memories! A friend of mine studied Hispanic-American Studies there and now he enjoys his free time sculling. On the other hand, University of Illinois at Springfield doesn't seem familiar. There must still be some corners in our friend circle we haven't stumbled upon yet.\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Small world indeed, Samuel! It appears we do have a mutual friend. The sculling enthusiast who studied Hispanic-American Studies at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee must be my friend Lawrence. It really is fascinating how social circles can intertwine. Ever been curious about wine tasting? It could be something else we both enjoy.\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Indeed, it's our mutual friend Lawrence then! The world just got a little smaller. As for wine tasting, it sounds intriguing. I've never really gotten into it, but I'm always open to new experiences. Who knows, maybe I'll pick up another hobby!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's the spirit, Samuel! Exploring new interests can often lead to some wonderful discoveries. If you're ever interested in attending one of my wine tasting nights, let Lawrence know. It would be a pleasure to share some insights with you.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nLawrence: Hobby: Sculling School: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Leonard Green & Partners \nKay: Hobby: Badminton School: Black Hills State University Major: Religious Education Company: National Airlines \nTanya: Hobby: Badminton School: University of Illinois at Springfield Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: ConverDyn \nJason: Hobby: Badminton School: Mount Senario College Major: Senior High Education Company: Vertex Pharmaceuticals \nCristina: Hobby: Badminton School: Mount Senario College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Exxon \nJosef: Hobby: Curling School: California State University, Northridge Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Concur Technologies\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hi Hendrick! Nice to meet you. So, do you have any unusual hobbies, like slot car racing or climbing? Some of my best friends love those activities.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Nice to meet you too, Samuel! Well, I\u2019m deeply into wine tasting, even host monthly get-togethers on that. I know people with some interesting hobbies like sculling and badminton. Quite a few of my badminton enthusiast friends also went to the Mount Senario College. I guess hobbies can bring about some unexpected connections, right?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Wine tasting, that's an interesting hobby! Wow, Mount Senario College, that rings a bell. I have a few connections through there. Interestingly enough, some are into astronomy while others studied Middle Eastern Languages or Fire protection & security. The diversity of interests from that college is quite something, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, the diversity is truly astounding! It's interesting that you mentioned Middle Eastern Languages. I have a good friend, Cristina, who studied that at Mount Senario College and now works at Exxon. She's a badminton enthusiast as well. Small world, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Samuel! The spectrum of interests is truly fascinating. Exxon, you say? Cristina actually ended up there after her studies. It's amazing how often paths cross in unexpected places. I wonder if we have more mutual acquaintances. Do you happen to know anyone from California State University, Northridge or perhaps someone who's into curling?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Curling, huh? Can't say that I do. As far as California State University, Northridge is concerned, that doesn't ring a bell either. However, I do have a couple of friends who attended Valley City State University. One is into parkour and the other, climbing. They majored in Biological Specializations and Middle Eastern Languages respectively. By any chance, do they sound familiar?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Parkour and climbing, wow! Those sound like quite adventurous hobbies. As to your friends from Valley City State, unfortunately, they don\u2019t sound familiar. Interesting though, I do have a friend named Josef from California State University, Northridge who majored in Middle Eastern Languages. He's a champ at curling too. I suppose our circles just haven't overlapped yet. Speaking of schools, do you have any connections to the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee or University of Illinois at Springfield?\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee! That triggers some memories! A friend of mine studied Hispanic-American Studies there and now he enjoys his free time sculling. On the other hand, University of Illinois at Springfield doesn't seem familiar. There must still be some corners in our friend circle we haven't stumbled upon yet.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Small world indeed, Samuel! It appears we do have a mutual friend. The sculling enthusiast who studied Hispanic-American Studies at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee must be my friend Lawrence. It really is fascinating how social circles can intertwine. Ever been curious about wine tasting? It could be something else we both enjoy.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nLawrence: Hobby: Sculling School: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Leonard Green & Partners \nKay: Hobby: Badminton School: Black Hills State University Major: Religious Education Company: National Airlines \nTanya: Hobby: Badminton School: University of Illinois at Springfield Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: ConverDyn \nJason: Hobby: Badminton School: Mount Senario College Major: Senior High Education Company: Vertex Pharmaceuticals \nCristina: Hobby: Badminton School: Mount Senario College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Exxon \nJosef: Hobby: Curling School: California State University, Northridge Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Concur Technologies\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hi Hendrick! Nice to meet you. So, do you have any unusual hobbies, like slot car racing or climbing? Some of my best friends love those activities.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Nice to meet you too, Samuel! Well, I\u2019m deeply into wine tasting, even host monthly get-togethers on that. I know people with some interesting hobbies like sculling and badminton. Quite a few of my badminton enthusiast friends also went to the Mount Senario College. I guess hobbies can bring about some unexpected connections, right?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Wine tasting, that's an interesting hobby! Wow, Mount Senario College, that rings a bell. I have a few connections through there. Interestingly enough, some are into astronomy while others studied Middle Eastern Languages or Fire protection & security. The diversity of interests from that college is quite something, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, the diversity is truly astounding! It's interesting that you mentioned Middle Eastern Languages. I have a good friend, Cristina, who studied that at Mount Senario College and now works at Exxon. She's a badminton enthusiast as well. Small world, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Samuel! The spectrum of interests is truly fascinating. Exxon, you say? Cristina actually ended up there after her studies. It's amazing how often paths cross in unexpected places. I wonder if we have more mutual acquaintances. Do you happen to know anyone from California State University, Northridge or perhaps someone who's into curling?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Curling, huh? Can't say that I do. As far as California State University, Northridge is concerned, that doesn't ring a bell either. However, I do have a couple of friends who attended Valley City State University. One is into parkour and the other, climbing. They majored in Biological Specializations and Middle Eastern Languages respectively. By any chance, do they sound familiar?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Parkour and climbing, wow! Those sound like quite adventurous hobbies. As to your friends from Valley City State, unfortunately, they don\u2019t sound familiar. Interesting though, I do have a friend named Josef from California State University, Northridge who majored in Middle Eastern Languages. He's a champ at curling too. I suppose our circles just haven't overlapped yet. Speaking of schools, do you have any connections to the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee or University of Illinois at Springfield?\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee! That triggers some memories! A friend of mine studied Hispanic-American Studies there and now he enjoys his free time sculling. On the other hand, University of Illinois at Springfield doesn't seem familiar. There must still be some corners in our friend circle we haven't stumbled upon yet.\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Small world indeed, Samuel! It appears we do have a mutual friend. The sculling enthusiast who studied Hispanic-American Studies at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee must be my friend Lawrence. It really is fascinating how social circles can intertwine. Ever been curious about wine tasting? It could be something else we both enjoy.\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Indeed, it's our mutual friend Lawrence then! The world just got a little smaller. As for wine tasting, it sounds intriguing. I've never really gotten into it, but I'm always open to new experiences. Who knows, maybe I'll pick up another hobby!\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's the spirit, Samuel! Exploring new interests can often lead to some wonderful discoveries. If you're ever interested in attending one of my wine tasting nights, let Lawrence know. It would be a pleasure to share some insights with you.\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"Thank you, Hendrick! I'd be delighted to join one of your wine tasting nights. I'll get in touch with Lawrence about it. It's been a pleasure meeting you and our chat was truly an enjoyable one. Hope to see you soon at the tasting!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"It's been a pleasure, Samuel! I'm looking forward to meeting you at the wine tasting. It should be a great opportunity to exchange more stories and to introduce you to my other friends. Till then, enjoy the party and take care!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nLawrence: Hobby: Sculling School: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Leonard Green & Partners \nKay: Hobby: Badminton School: Black Hills State University Major: Religious Education Company: National Airlines \nTanya: Hobby: Badminton School: University of Illinois at Springfield Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: ConverDyn \nJason: Hobby: Badminton School: Mount Senario College Major: Senior High Education Company: Vertex Pharmaceuticals \nCristina: Hobby: Badminton School: Mount Senario College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Exxon \nJosef: Hobby: Curling School: California State University, Northridge Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Concur Technologies\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hi Hendrick! Nice to meet you. So, do you have any unusual hobbies, like slot car racing or climbing? Some of my best friends love those activities.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Nice to meet you too, Samuel! Well, I\u2019m deeply into wine tasting, even host monthly get-togethers on that. I know people with some interesting hobbies like sculling and badminton. Quite a few of my badminton enthusiast friends also went to the Mount Senario College. I guess hobbies can bring about some unexpected connections, right?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Wine tasting, that's an interesting hobby! Wow, Mount Senario College, that rings a bell. I have a few connections through there. Interestingly enough, some are into astronomy while others studied Middle Eastern Languages or Fire protection & security. The diversity of interests from that college is quite something, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, the diversity is truly astounding! It's interesting that you mentioned Middle Eastern Languages. I have a good friend, Cristina, who studied that at Mount Senario College and now works at Exxon. She's a badminton enthusiast as well. Small world, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Samuel! The spectrum of interests is truly fascinating. Exxon, you say? Cristina actually ended up there after her studies. It's amazing how often paths cross in unexpected places. I wonder if we have more mutual acquaintances. Do you happen to know anyone from California State University, Northridge or perhaps someone who's into curling?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Curling, huh? Can't say that I do. As far as California State University, Northridge is concerned, that doesn't ring a bell either. However, I do have a couple of friends who attended Valley City State University. One is into parkour and the other, climbing. They majored in Biological Specializations and Middle Eastern Languages respectively. By any chance, do they sound familiar?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Parkour and climbing, wow! Those sound like quite adventurous hobbies. As to your friends from Valley City State, unfortunately, they don\u2019t sound familiar. Interesting though, I do have a friend named Josef from California State University, Northridge who majored in Middle Eastern Languages. He's a champ at curling too. I suppose our circles just haven't overlapped yet. Speaking of schools, do you have any connections to the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee or University of Illinois at Springfield?\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee! That triggers some memories! A friend of mine studied Hispanic-American Studies there and now he enjoys his free time sculling. On the other hand, University of Illinois at Springfield doesn't seem familiar. There must still be some corners in our friend circle we haven't stumbled upon yet.\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Small world indeed, Samuel! It appears we do have a mutual friend. The sculling enthusiast who studied Hispanic-American Studies at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee must be my friend Lawrence. It really is fascinating how social circles can intertwine. Ever been curious about wine tasting? It could be something else we both enjoy.\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Indeed, it's our mutual friend Lawrence then! The world just got a little smaller. As for wine tasting, it sounds intriguing. I've never really gotten into it, but I'm always open to new experiences. Who knows, maybe I'll pick up another hobby!\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's the spirit, Samuel! Exploring new interests can often lead to some wonderful discoveries. If you're ever interested in attending one of my wine tasting nights, let Lawrence know. It would be a pleasure to share some insights with you.\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"Thank you, Hendrick! I'd be delighted to join one of your wine tasting nights. I'll get in touch with Lawrence about it. It's been a pleasure meeting you and our chat was truly an enjoyable one. Hope to see you soon at the tasting!\"\n\nTurn #13: Hendrick Heinz said: \"It's been a pleasure, Samuel! I'm looking forward to meeting you at the wine tasting. It should be a great opportunity to exchange more stories and to introduce you to my other friends. Till then, enjoy the party and take care!\"\n\nTurn #14: Samuel Anderson left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nSamuel Anderson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nRobert: Major: Religious Education School: School of the Art Institute of Chicago \nLester: Major: Biological Specializations School: Syracuse University \nAugust: Major: Biological Specializations School: School of the Art Institute of Chicago \nRose: Major: Biological Specializations School: Calvin College \nRandy: Major: Biological Specializations School: Dowling College \nDennise: Major: Marine Engineering School: Wartburg College \nJoan: Major: Pre-School Education School: University of Texas at Arlington \nBarbara: Major: Ministry & Church Administration School: University of Connecticut \nLoretta: Major: Biological Specializations School: University of Connecticut \n\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey there, I'm Samuel! I couldn't help but overhear you talking about software development a moment ago. Do you work in the field as well?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nSamuel Anderson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nRobert: Major: Religious Education School: School of the Art Institute of Chicago \nLester: Major: Biological Specializations School: Syracuse University \nAugust: Major: Biological Specializations School: School of the Art Institute of Chicago \nRose: Major: Biological Specializations School: Calvin College \nRandy: Major: Biological Specializations School: Dowling College \nDennise: Major: Marine Engineering School: Wartburg College \nJoan: Major: Pre-School Education School: University of Texas at Arlington \nBarbara: Major: Ministry & Church Administration School: University of Connecticut \nLoretta: Major: Biological Specializations School: University of Connecticut \n\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey there, I'm Samuel! I couldn't help but overhear you talking about software development a moment ago. Do you work in the field as well?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello Samuel, nice to meet you! I'm not in software development, I'm actually a chef and quite a big fan of wines, which I often discuss at some monthly tastings I host. By the way, given our different fields, I was curious. Did you have any Physical Education or perhaps Marine Engineering classes back in school?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oh, wow! A chef, that's interesting. I do enjoy cooking myself. As for your question, no, I didn't have any PE or Marine Engineering classes in school. Actually, I have a friend, Dennise, who pursued Marine Engineering at Wartburg College. Have you by any chance come across her in your wine tastings?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nSamuel Anderson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nRobert: Major: Religious Education School: School of the Art Institute of Chicago \nLester: Major: Biological Specializations School: Syracuse University \nAugust: Major: Biological Specializations School: School of the Art Institute of Chicago \nRose: Major: Biological Specializations School: Calvin College \nRandy: Major: Biological Specializations School: Dowling College \nDennise: Major: Marine Engineering School: Wartburg College \nJoan: Major: Pre-School Education School: University of Texas at Arlington \nBarbara: Major: Ministry & Church Administration School: University of Connecticut \nLoretta: Major: Biological Specializations School: University of Connecticut \n\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey there, I'm Samuel! I couldn't help but overhear you talking about software development a moment ago. Do you work in the field as well?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello Samuel, nice to meet you! I'm not in software development, I'm actually a chef and quite a big fan of wines, which I often discuss at some monthly tastings I host. By the way, given our different fields, I was curious. Did you have any Physical Education or perhaps Marine Engineering classes back in school?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oh, wow! A chef, that's interesting. I do enjoy cooking myself. As for your question, no, I didn't have any PE or Marine Engineering classes in school. Actually, I have a friend, Dennise, who pursued Marine Engineering at Wartburg College. Have you by any chance come across her in your wine tastings?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ah, Dennise doesn't sound familiar, Samuel. But it's quite a coincidence though. I know a couple of people who studied Marine Engineering, one of them is Ruth, who attended Texas A&M University-Kingsville. I find it fascinating how different our paths can be yet they intertwine at some point.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's quite intriguing, life really has a funny way of connecting different threads. You mentioned Ruth who studied at Texas A&M University-Kingsville; now that reminds me of a different Ruth, Ruth Mendoza. She was a figure skater, with whom I trained in high school. Not sure if you've heard of her?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nSamuel Anderson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nRobert: Major: Religious Education School: School of the Art Institute of Chicago \nLester: Major: Biological Specializations School: Syracuse University \nAugust: Major: Biological Specializations School: School of the Art Institute of Chicago \nRose: Major: Biological Specializations School: Calvin College \nRandy: Major: Biological Specializations School: Dowling College \nDennise: Major: Marine Engineering School: Wartburg College \nJoan: Major: Pre-School Education School: University of Texas at Arlington \nBarbara: Major: Ministry & Church Administration School: University of Connecticut \nLoretta: Major: Biological Specializations School: University of Connecticut \n\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey there, I'm Samuel! I couldn't help but overhear you talking about software development a moment ago. Do you work in the field as well?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello Samuel, nice to meet you! I'm not in software development, I'm actually a chef and quite a big fan of wines, which I often discuss at some monthly tastings I host. By the way, given our different fields, I was curious. Did you have any Physical Education or perhaps Marine Engineering classes back in school?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oh, wow! A chef, that's interesting. I do enjoy cooking myself. As for your question, no, I didn't have any PE or Marine Engineering classes in school. Actually, I have a friend, Dennise, who pursued Marine Engineering at Wartburg College. Have you by any chance come across her in your wine tastings?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ah, Dennise doesn't sound familiar, Samuel. But it's quite a coincidence though. I know a couple of people who studied Marine Engineering, one of them is Ruth, who attended Texas A&M University-Kingsville. I find it fascinating how different our paths can be yet they intertwine at some point.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's quite intriguing, life really has a funny way of connecting different threads. You mentioned Ruth who studied at Texas A&M University-Kingsville; now that reminds me of a different Ruth, Ruth Mendoza. She was a figure skater, with whom I trained in high school. Not sure if you've heard of her?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ah, a figure skater, that sounds like a physically demanding path to take. I had a friend named Eric who did Physical Education at the University of Texas at Arlington, he always admired athletes. Is there any chance your paths crossed or perhaps that you both trained at the same facility?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nSamuel Anderson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nRobert: Major: Religious Education School: School of the Art Institute of Chicago \nLester: Major: Biological Specializations School: Syracuse University \nAugust: Major: Biological Specializations School: School of the Art Institute of Chicago \nRose: Major: Biological Specializations School: Calvin College \nRandy: Major: Biological Specializations School: Dowling College \nDennise: Major: Marine Engineering School: Wartburg College \nJoan: Major: Pre-School Education School: University of Texas at Arlington \nBarbara: Major: Ministry & Church Administration School: University of Connecticut \nLoretta: Major: Biological Specializations School: University of Connecticut \n\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey there, I'm Samuel! I couldn't help but overhear you talking about software development a moment ago. Do you work in the field as well?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello Samuel, nice to meet you! I'm not in software development, I'm actually a chef and quite a big fan of wines, which I often discuss at some monthly tastings I host. By the way, given our different fields, I was curious. Did you have any Physical Education or perhaps Marine Engineering classes back in school?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oh, wow! A chef, that's interesting. I do enjoy cooking myself. As for your question, no, I didn't have any PE or Marine Engineering classes in school. Actually, I have a friend, Dennise, who pursued Marine Engineering at Wartburg College. Have you by any chance come across her in your wine tastings?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ah, Dennise doesn't sound familiar, Samuel. But it's quite a coincidence though. I know a couple of people who studied Marine Engineering, one of them is Ruth, who attended Texas A&M University-Kingsville. I find it fascinating how different our paths can be yet they intertwine at some point.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's quite intriguing, life really has a funny way of connecting different threads. You mentioned Ruth who studied at Texas A&M University-Kingsville; now that reminds me of a different Ruth, Ruth Mendoza. She was a figure skater, with whom I trained in high school. Not sure if you've heard of her?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ah, a figure skater, that sounds like a physically demanding path to take. I had a friend named Eric who did Physical Education at the University of Texas at Arlington, he always admired athletes. Is there any chance your paths crossed or perhaps that you both trained at the same facility?\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I'm afraid I haven't come across her, Samuel, but it's always interesting to hear stories about varying paths people take. Speaking of training facilities, I know a few friends who dabbled in education. One of them, Jamie, majored in Pre-School Education at the University of Texas at Arlington, and Evelyn did the same but at the Tennessee Technological University. Makes me wonder if their paths crossed with any of your friends who followed a similar route?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Yes, that's true. Working with kids certainly has its own challenges and rewards. It so happens that I know Joan, who majored in Pre-School Education at the University of Texas at Arlington. I wonder if she might have crossed paths with your friend Jamie along the way? It's quite possible given they were at the same university, don't you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nSamuel Anderson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nRobert: Major: Religious Education School: School of the Art Institute of Chicago \nLester: Major: Biological Specializations School: Syracuse University \nAugust: Major: Biological Specializations School: School of the Art Institute of Chicago \nRose: Major: Biological Specializations School: Calvin College \nRandy: Major: Biological Specializations School: Dowling College \nDennise: Major: Marine Engineering School: Wartburg College \nJoan: Major: Pre-School Education School: University of Texas at Arlington \nBarbara: Major: Ministry & Church Administration School: University of Connecticut \nLoretta: Major: Biological Specializations School: University of Connecticut \n\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey there, I'm Samuel! I couldn't help but overhear you talking about software development a moment ago. Do you work in the field as well?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello Samuel, nice to meet you! I'm not in software development, I'm actually a chef and quite a big fan of wines, which I often discuss at some monthly tastings I host. By the way, given our different fields, I was curious. Did you have any Physical Education or perhaps Marine Engineering classes back in school?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oh, wow! A chef, that's interesting. I do enjoy cooking myself. As for your question, no, I didn't have any PE or Marine Engineering classes in school. Actually, I have a friend, Dennise, who pursued Marine Engineering at Wartburg College. Have you by any chance come across her in your wine tastings?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ah, Dennise doesn't sound familiar, Samuel. But it's quite a coincidence though. I know a couple of people who studied Marine Engineering, one of them is Ruth, who attended Texas A&M University-Kingsville. I find it fascinating how different our paths can be yet they intertwine at some point.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's quite intriguing, life really has a funny way of connecting different threads. You mentioned Ruth who studied at Texas A&M University-Kingsville; now that reminds me of a different Ruth, Ruth Mendoza. She was a figure skater, with whom I trained in high school. Not sure if you've heard of her?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ah, a figure skater, that sounds like a physically demanding path to take. I had a friend named Eric who did Physical Education at the University of Texas at Arlington, he always admired athletes. Is there any chance your paths crossed or perhaps that you both trained at the same facility?\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I'm afraid I haven't come across her, Samuel, but it's always interesting to hear stories about varying paths people take. Speaking of training facilities, I know a few friends who dabbled in education. One of them, Jamie, majored in Pre-School Education at the University of Texas at Arlington, and Evelyn did the same but at the Tennessee Technological University. Makes me wonder if their paths crossed with any of your friends who followed a similar route?\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Yes, that's true. Working with kids certainly has its own challenges and rewards. It so happens that I know Joan, who majored in Pre-School Education at the University of Texas at Arlington. I wonder if she might have crossed paths with your friend Jamie along the way? It's quite possible given they were at the same university, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's incredibly likely, Samuel. The world of academia is a small one after all. You know, it's such a great feeling, connecting the dots between mutual friends and acquaintances. Perhaps next time when you're free, you could join one of my wine tasting events, it would be an interesting opportunity for these paths to cross again, don't you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I completely agree, Hendrick. It is indeed fascinating to discover these unexpected connections. And I'd love to join a wine tasting event. I'm always up for trying new experiences, and who knows, we might find more connections! Looking forward to it.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nSamuel Anderson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nRobert: Major: Religious Education School: School of the Art Institute of Chicago \nLester: Major: Biological Specializations School: Syracuse University \nAugust: Major: Biological Specializations School: School of the Art Institute of Chicago \nRose: Major: Biological Specializations School: Calvin College \nRandy: Major: Biological Specializations School: Dowling College \nDennise: Major: Marine Engineering School: Wartburg College \nJoan: Major: Pre-School Education School: University of Texas at Arlington \nBarbara: Major: Ministry & Church Administration School: University of Connecticut \nLoretta: Major: Biological Specializations School: University of Connecticut \n\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey there, I'm Samuel! I couldn't help but overhear you talking about software development a moment ago. Do you work in the field as well?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello Samuel, nice to meet you! I'm not in software development, I'm actually a chef and quite a big fan of wines, which I often discuss at some monthly tastings I host. By the way, given our different fields, I was curious. Did you have any Physical Education or perhaps Marine Engineering classes back in school?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oh, wow! A chef, that's interesting. I do enjoy cooking myself. As for your question, no, I didn't have any PE or Marine Engineering classes in school. Actually, I have a friend, Dennise, who pursued Marine Engineering at Wartburg College. Have you by any chance come across her in your wine tastings?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ah, Dennise doesn't sound familiar, Samuel. But it's quite a coincidence though. I know a couple of people who studied Marine Engineering, one of them is Ruth, who attended Texas A&M University-Kingsville. I find it fascinating how different our paths can be yet they intertwine at some point.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's quite intriguing, life really has a funny way of connecting different threads. You mentioned Ruth who studied at Texas A&M University-Kingsville; now that reminds me of a different Ruth, Ruth Mendoza. She was a figure skater, with whom I trained in high school. Not sure if you've heard of her?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ah, a figure skater, that sounds like a physically demanding path to take. I had a friend named Eric who did Physical Education at the University of Texas at Arlington, he always admired athletes. Is there any chance your paths crossed or perhaps that you both trained at the same facility?\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I'm afraid I haven't come across her, Samuel, but it's always interesting to hear stories about varying paths people take. Speaking of training facilities, I know a few friends who dabbled in education. One of them, Jamie, majored in Pre-School Education at the University of Texas at Arlington, and Evelyn did the same but at the Tennessee Technological University. Makes me wonder if their paths crossed with any of your friends who followed a similar route?\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Yes, that's true. Working with kids certainly has its own challenges and rewards. It so happens that I know Joan, who majored in Pre-School Education at the University of Texas at Arlington. I wonder if she might have crossed paths with your friend Jamie along the way? It's quite possible given they were at the same university, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's incredibly likely, Samuel. The world of academia is a small one after all. You know, it's such a great feeling, connecting the dots between mutual friends and acquaintances. Perhaps next time when you're free, you could join one of my wine tasting events, it would be an interesting opportunity for these paths to cross again, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"I completely agree, Hendrick. It is indeed fascinating to discover these unexpected connections. And I'd love to join a wine tasting event. I'm always up for trying new experiences, and who knows, we might find more connections! Looking forward to it.\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I'm delighted to know you're open to it, Samuel. It will indeed be an incredible experience to discover more connections over a glass of good wine. I'll make sure to send you an invitation for our next event. It was really splendid meeting you here today.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm looking forward to it, Hendrick. It was a pleasure meeting you as well. And I agree, it's always captivating to discover how interconnected our paths can be. Don't forget to send that invitation, I'll make sure to attend!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nSamuel Anderson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nRobert: Major: Religious Education School: School of the Art Institute of Chicago \nLester: Major: Biological Specializations School: Syracuse University \nAugust: Major: Biological Specializations School: School of the Art Institute of Chicago \nRose: Major: Biological Specializations School: Calvin College \nRandy: Major: Biological Specializations School: Dowling College \nDennise: Major: Marine Engineering School: Wartburg College \nJoan: Major: Pre-School Education School: University of Texas at Arlington \nBarbara: Major: Ministry & Church Administration School: University of Connecticut \nLoretta: Major: Biological Specializations School: University of Connecticut \n\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey there, I'm Samuel! I couldn't help but overhear you talking about software development a moment ago. Do you work in the field as well?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello Samuel, nice to meet you! I'm not in software development, I'm actually a chef and quite a big fan of wines, which I often discuss at some monthly tastings I host. By the way, given our different fields, I was curious. Did you have any Physical Education or perhaps Marine Engineering classes back in school?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oh, wow! A chef, that's interesting. I do enjoy cooking myself. As for your question, no, I didn't have any PE or Marine Engineering classes in school. Actually, I have a friend, Dennise, who pursued Marine Engineering at Wartburg College. Have you by any chance come across her in your wine tastings?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ah, Dennise doesn't sound familiar, Samuel. But it's quite a coincidence though. I know a couple of people who studied Marine Engineering, one of them is Ruth, who attended Texas A&M University-Kingsville. I find it fascinating how different our paths can be yet they intertwine at some point.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's quite intriguing, life really has a funny way of connecting different threads. You mentioned Ruth who studied at Texas A&M University-Kingsville; now that reminds me of a different Ruth, Ruth Mendoza. She was a figure skater, with whom I trained in high school. Not sure if you've heard of her?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ah, a figure skater, that sounds like a physically demanding path to take. I had a friend named Eric who did Physical Education at the University of Texas at Arlington, he always admired athletes. Is there any chance your paths crossed or perhaps that you both trained at the same facility?\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I'm afraid I haven't come across her, Samuel, but it's always interesting to hear stories about varying paths people take. Speaking of training facilities, I know a few friends who dabbled in education. One of them, Jamie, majored in Pre-School Education at the University of Texas at Arlington, and Evelyn did the same but at the Tennessee Technological University. Makes me wonder if their paths crossed with any of your friends who followed a similar route?\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Yes, that's true. Working with kids certainly has its own challenges and rewards. It so happens that I know Joan, who majored in Pre-School Education at the University of Texas at Arlington. I wonder if she might have crossed paths with your friend Jamie along the way? It's quite possible given they were at the same university, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's incredibly likely, Samuel. The world of academia is a small one after all. You know, it's such a great feeling, connecting the dots between mutual friends and acquaintances. Perhaps next time when you're free, you could join one of my wine tasting events, it would be an interesting opportunity for these paths to cross again, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"I completely agree, Hendrick. It is indeed fascinating to discover these unexpected connections. And I'd love to join a wine tasting event. I'm always up for trying new experiences, and who knows, we might find more connections! Looking forward to it.\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I'm delighted to know you're open to it, Samuel. It will indeed be an incredible experience to discover more connections over a glass of good wine. I'll make sure to send you an invitation for our next event. It was really splendid meeting you here today.\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm looking forward to it, Hendrick. It was a pleasure meeting you as well. And I agree, it's always captivating to discover how interconnected our paths can be. Don't forget to send that invitation, I'll make sure to attend!\"\n\nTurn #13: Hendrick Heinz left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nEric: Major: Physical Education School: University of Texas at Arlington \nDarrell: Major: Physical Education School: Valley City State University \nRuth: Major: Marine Engineering School: Texas A&M University-Kingsville \nJamie: Major: Pre-School Education School: University of Texas at Arlington \nMarjorie: Major: Multi Studies School: Pacific Western University \nEvelyn: Major: Pre-School Education School: Tennessee Technological University \nLoretta: Major: Biological Specializations School: University of Connecticut \nJames: Major: Marine Engineering School: Texas A&M University-Kingsville \nSandra: Major: Ministry & Church Administration School: University of Texas at Arlington\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey there, I'm Samuel! I couldn't help but overhear you talking about software development a moment ago. Do you work in the field as well?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hello Samuel, nice to meet you! I'm not in software development, I'm actually a chef and quite a big fan of wines, which I often discuss at some monthly tastings I host. By the way, given our different fields, I was curious. Did you have any Physical Education or perhaps Marine Engineering classes back in school?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nEric: Major: Physical Education School: University of Texas at Arlington \nDarrell: Major: Physical Education School: Valley City State University \nRuth: Major: Marine Engineering School: Texas A&M University-Kingsville \nJamie: Major: Pre-School Education School: University of Texas at Arlington \nMarjorie: Major: Multi Studies School: Pacific Western University \nEvelyn: Major: Pre-School Education School: Tennessee Technological University \nLoretta: Major: Biological Specializations School: University of Connecticut \nJames: Major: Marine Engineering School: Texas A&M University-Kingsville \nSandra: Major: Ministry & Church Administration School: University of Texas at Arlington\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey there, I'm Samuel! I couldn't help but overhear you talking about software development a moment ago. Do you work in the field as well?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello Samuel, nice to meet you! I'm not in software development, I'm actually a chef and quite a big fan of wines, which I often discuss at some monthly tastings I host. By the way, given our different fields, I was curious. Did you have any Physical Education or perhaps Marine Engineering classes back in school?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oh, wow! A chef, that's interesting. I do enjoy cooking myself. As for your question, no, I didn't have any PE or Marine Engineering classes in school. Actually, I have a friend, Dennise, who pursued Marine Engineering at Wartburg College. Have you by any chance come across her in your wine tastings?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ah, Dennise doesn't sound familiar, Samuel. But it's quite a coincidence though. I know a couple of people who studied Marine Engineering, one of them is Ruth, who attended Texas A&M University-Kingsville. I find it fascinating how different our paths can be yet they intertwine at some point.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nEric: Major: Physical Education School: University of Texas at Arlington \nDarrell: Major: Physical Education School: Valley City State University \nRuth: Major: Marine Engineering School: Texas A&M University-Kingsville \nJamie: Major: Pre-School Education School: University of Texas at Arlington \nMarjorie: Major: Multi Studies School: Pacific Western University \nEvelyn: Major: Pre-School Education School: Tennessee Technological University \nLoretta: Major: Biological Specializations School: University of Connecticut \nJames: Major: Marine Engineering School: Texas A&M University-Kingsville \nSandra: Major: Ministry & Church Administration School: University of Texas at Arlington\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey there, I'm Samuel! I couldn't help but overhear you talking about software development a moment ago. Do you work in the field as well?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello Samuel, nice to meet you! I'm not in software development, I'm actually a chef and quite a big fan of wines, which I often discuss at some monthly tastings I host. By the way, given our different fields, I was curious. Did you have any Physical Education or perhaps Marine Engineering classes back in school?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oh, wow! A chef, that's interesting. I do enjoy cooking myself. As for your question, no, I didn't have any PE or Marine Engineering classes in school. Actually, I have a friend, Dennise, who pursued Marine Engineering at Wartburg College. Have you by any chance come across her in your wine tastings?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ah, Dennise doesn't sound familiar, Samuel. But it's quite a coincidence though. I know a couple of people who studied Marine Engineering, one of them is Ruth, who attended Texas A&M University-Kingsville. I find it fascinating how different our paths can be yet they intertwine at some point.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's quite intriguing, life really has a funny way of connecting different threads. You mentioned Ruth who studied at Texas A&M University-Kingsville; now that reminds me of a different Ruth, Ruth Mendoza. She was a figure skater, with whom I trained in high school. Not sure if you've heard of her?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Ah, a figure skater, that sounds like a physically demanding path to take. I had a friend named Eric who did Physical Education at the University of Texas at Arlington, he always admired athletes. Is there any chance your paths crossed or perhaps that you both trained at the same facility?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nEric: Major: Physical Education School: University of Texas at Arlington \nDarrell: Major: Physical Education School: Valley City State University \nRuth: Major: Marine Engineering School: Texas A&M University-Kingsville \nJamie: Major: Pre-School Education School: University of Texas at Arlington \nMarjorie: Major: Multi Studies School: Pacific Western University \nEvelyn: Major: Pre-School Education School: Tennessee Technological University \nLoretta: Major: Biological Specializations School: University of Connecticut \nJames: Major: Marine Engineering School: Texas A&M University-Kingsville \nSandra: Major: Ministry & Church Administration School: University of Texas at Arlington\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey there, I'm Samuel! I couldn't help but overhear you talking about software development a moment ago. Do you work in the field as well?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello Samuel, nice to meet you! I'm not in software development, I'm actually a chef and quite a big fan of wines, which I often discuss at some monthly tastings I host. By the way, given our different fields, I was curious. Did you have any Physical Education or perhaps Marine Engineering classes back in school?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oh, wow! A chef, that's interesting. I do enjoy cooking myself. As for your question, no, I didn't have any PE or Marine Engineering classes in school. Actually, I have a friend, Dennise, who pursued Marine Engineering at Wartburg College. Have you by any chance come across her in your wine tastings?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ah, Dennise doesn't sound familiar, Samuel. But it's quite a coincidence though. I know a couple of people who studied Marine Engineering, one of them is Ruth, who attended Texas A&M University-Kingsville. I find it fascinating how different our paths can be yet they intertwine at some point.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's quite intriguing, life really has a funny way of connecting different threads. You mentioned Ruth who studied at Texas A&M University-Kingsville; now that reminds me of a different Ruth, Ruth Mendoza. She was a figure skater, with whom I trained in high school. Not sure if you've heard of her?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ah, a figure skater, that sounds like a physically demanding path to take. I had a friend named Eric who did Physical Education at the University of Texas at Arlington, he always admired athletes. Is there any chance your paths crossed or perhaps that you both trained at the same facility?\"\n\nTurn #6: \n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm afraid I haven't come across her, Samuel, but it's always interesting to hear stories about varying paths people take. Speaking of training facilities, I know a few friends who dabbled in education. One of them, Jamie, majored in Pre-School Education at the University of Texas at Arlington, and Evelyn did the same but at the Tennessee Technological University. Makes me wonder if their paths crossed with any of your friends who followed a similar route?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nEric: Major: Physical Education School: University of Texas at Arlington \nDarrell: Major: Physical Education School: Valley City State University \nRuth: Major: Marine Engineering School: Texas A&M University-Kingsville \nJamie: Major: Pre-School Education School: University of Texas at Arlington \nMarjorie: Major: Multi Studies School: Pacific Western University \nEvelyn: Major: Pre-School Education School: Tennessee Technological University \nLoretta: Major: Biological Specializations School: University of Connecticut \nJames: Major: Marine Engineering School: Texas A&M University-Kingsville \nSandra: Major: Ministry & Church Administration School: University of Texas at Arlington\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey there, I'm Samuel! I couldn't help but overhear you talking about software development a moment ago. Do you work in the field as well?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello Samuel, nice to meet you! I'm not in software development, I'm actually a chef and quite a big fan of wines, which I often discuss at some monthly tastings I host. By the way, given our different fields, I was curious. Did you have any Physical Education or perhaps Marine Engineering classes back in school?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oh, wow! A chef, that's interesting. I do enjoy cooking myself. As for your question, no, I didn't have any PE or Marine Engineering classes in school. Actually, I have a friend, Dennise, who pursued Marine Engineering at Wartburg College. Have you by any chance come across her in your wine tastings?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ah, Dennise doesn't sound familiar, Samuel. But it's quite a coincidence though. I know a couple of people who studied Marine Engineering, one of them is Ruth, who attended Texas A&M University-Kingsville. I find it fascinating how different our paths can be yet they intertwine at some point.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's quite intriguing, life really has a funny way of connecting different threads. You mentioned Ruth who studied at Texas A&M University-Kingsville; now that reminds me of a different Ruth, Ruth Mendoza. She was a figure skater, with whom I trained in high school. Not sure if you've heard of her?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ah, a figure skater, that sounds like a physically demanding path to take. I had a friend named Eric who did Physical Education at the University of Texas at Arlington, he always admired athletes. Is there any chance your paths crossed or perhaps that you both trained at the same facility?\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I'm afraid I haven't come across her, Samuel, but it's always interesting to hear stories about varying paths people take. Speaking of training facilities, I know a few friends who dabbled in education. One of them, Jamie, majored in Pre-School Education at the University of Texas at Arlington, and Evelyn did the same but at the Tennessee Technological University. Makes me wonder if their paths crossed with any of your friends who followed a similar route?\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Yes, that's true. Working with kids certainly has its own challenges and rewards. It so happens that I know Joan, who majored in Pre-School Education at the University of Texas at Arlington. I wonder if she might have crossed paths with your friend Jamie along the way? It's quite possible given they were at the same university, don't you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's incredibly likely, Samuel. The world of academia is a small one after all. You know, it's such a great feeling, connecting the dots between mutual friends and acquaintances. Perhaps next time when you're free, you could join one of my wine tasting events, it would be an interesting opportunity for these paths to cross again, don't you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nEric: Major: Physical Education School: University of Texas at Arlington \nDarrell: Major: Physical Education School: Valley City State University \nRuth: Major: Marine Engineering School: Texas A&M University-Kingsville \nJamie: Major: Pre-School Education School: University of Texas at Arlington \nMarjorie: Major: Multi Studies School: Pacific Western University \nEvelyn: Major: Pre-School Education School: Tennessee Technological University \nLoretta: Major: Biological Specializations School: University of Connecticut \nJames: Major: Marine Engineering School: Texas A&M University-Kingsville \nSandra: Major: Ministry & Church Administration School: University of Texas at Arlington\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey there, I'm Samuel! I couldn't help but overhear you talking about software development a moment ago. Do you work in the field as well?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello Samuel, nice to meet you! I'm not in software development, I'm actually a chef and quite a big fan of wines, which I often discuss at some monthly tastings I host. By the way, given our different fields, I was curious. Did you have any Physical Education or perhaps Marine Engineering classes back in school?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oh, wow! A chef, that's interesting. I do enjoy cooking myself. As for your question, no, I didn't have any PE or Marine Engineering classes in school. Actually, I have a friend, Dennise, who pursued Marine Engineering at Wartburg College. Have you by any chance come across her in your wine tastings?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ah, Dennise doesn't sound familiar, Samuel. But it's quite a coincidence though. I know a couple of people who studied Marine Engineering, one of them is Ruth, who attended Texas A&M University-Kingsville. I find it fascinating how different our paths can be yet they intertwine at some point.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's quite intriguing, life really has a funny way of connecting different threads. You mentioned Ruth who studied at Texas A&M University-Kingsville; now that reminds me of a different Ruth, Ruth Mendoza. She was a figure skater, with whom I trained in high school. Not sure if you've heard of her?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ah, a figure skater, that sounds like a physically demanding path to take. I had a friend named Eric who did Physical Education at the University of Texas at Arlington, he always admired athletes. Is there any chance your paths crossed or perhaps that you both trained at the same facility?\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I'm afraid I haven't come across her, Samuel, but it's always interesting to hear stories about varying paths people take. Speaking of training facilities, I know a few friends who dabbled in education. One of them, Jamie, majored in Pre-School Education at the University of Texas at Arlington, and Evelyn did the same but at the Tennessee Technological University. Makes me wonder if their paths crossed with any of your friends who followed a similar route?\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Yes, that's true. Working with kids certainly has its own challenges and rewards. It so happens that I know Joan, who majored in Pre-School Education at the University of Texas at Arlington. I wonder if she might have crossed paths with your friend Jamie along the way? It's quite possible given they were at the same university, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's incredibly likely, Samuel. The world of academia is a small one after all. You know, it's such a great feeling, connecting the dots between mutual friends and acquaintances. Perhaps next time when you're free, you could join one of my wine tasting events, it would be an interesting opportunity for these paths to cross again, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"I completely agree, Hendrick. It is indeed fascinating to discover these unexpected connections. And I'd love to join a wine tasting event. I'm always up for trying new experiences, and who knows, we might find more connections! Looking forward to it.\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I'm delighted to know you're open to it, Samuel. It will indeed be an incredible experience to discover more connections over a glass of good wine. I'll make sure to send you an invitation for our next event. It was really splendid meeting you here today.\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"I'm looking forward to it, Hendrick. It was a pleasure meeting you as well. And I agree, it's always captivating to discover how interconnected our paths can be. Don't forget to send that invitation, I'll make sure to attend!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Rafael Cortez, your task is to act/speak as Rafael Cortez would, keeping in mind Rafael Cortez's social goal.\nYou can find Rafael Cortez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Rafael Cortez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Rafael Cortez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person has put up their Bell\\'O TV Stand - Black Glass and Wood Trim for sale at $125.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. The item on sale is a beautiful 42\" Bell\\'O TV Stand, featuring black glass with an elegant wood trim. The stand measures 23 inches in height and 21 1/2 inches in depth.\nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. Personality and values description: Rafael Cortez, with his outgoing nature and competitive spirit, believes in self-direction. He employs a systematic approach to his decisions. Rafael's secrets: He cheated on his medical school exams.\nOliver Thompson's background: \nRafael Cortez's goal: You are the buyer for this item and your target price is $112.00. Be aware that you may be penalized if you purchase it for a significantly higher price than the target. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hello Oliver, I am interested in the Bell'O TV Stand you've put up for sale. It looks like a wonderful piece of furniture. Would you consider letting it go for $112.00?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nEric: Major: Physical Education School: University of Texas at Arlington \nDarrell: Major: Physical Education School: Valley City State University \nRuth: Major: Marine Engineering School: Texas A&M University-Kingsville \nJamie: Major: Pre-School Education School: University of Texas at Arlington \nMarjorie: Major: Multi Studies School: Pacific Western University \nEvelyn: Major: Pre-School Education School: Tennessee Technological University \nLoretta: Major: Biological Specializations School: University of Connecticut \nJames: Major: Marine Engineering School: Texas A&M University-Kingsville \nSandra: Major: Ministry & Church Administration School: University of Texas at Arlington\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey there, I'm Samuel! I couldn't help but overhear you talking about software development a moment ago. Do you work in the field as well?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello Samuel, nice to meet you! I'm not in software development, I'm actually a chef and quite a big fan of wines, which I often discuss at some monthly tastings I host. By the way, given our different fields, I was curious. Did you have any Physical Education or perhaps Marine Engineering classes back in school?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oh, wow! A chef, that's interesting. I do enjoy cooking myself. As for your question, no, I didn't have any PE or Marine Engineering classes in school. Actually, I have a friend, Dennise, who pursued Marine Engineering at Wartburg College. Have you by any chance come across her in your wine tastings?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ah, Dennise doesn't sound familiar, Samuel. But it's quite a coincidence though. I know a couple of people who studied Marine Engineering, one of them is Ruth, who attended Texas A&M University-Kingsville. I find it fascinating how different our paths can be yet they intertwine at some point.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's quite intriguing, life really has a funny way of connecting different threads. You mentioned Ruth who studied at Texas A&M University-Kingsville; now that reminds me of a different Ruth, Ruth Mendoza. She was a figure skater, with whom I trained in high school. Not sure if you've heard of her?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ah, a figure skater, that sounds like a physically demanding path to take. I had a friend named Eric who did Physical Education at the University of Texas at Arlington, he always admired athletes. Is there any chance your paths crossed or perhaps that you both trained at the same facility?\"\n\nTurn #6: \n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I'm afraid I haven't come across her, Samuel, but it's always interesting to hear stories about varying paths people take. Speaking of training facilities, I know a few friends who dabbled in education. One of them, Jamie, majored in Pre-School Education at the University of Texas at Arlington, and Evelyn did the same but at the Tennessee Technological University. Makes me wonder if their paths crossed with any of your friends who followed a similar route?\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Yes, that's true. Working with kids certainly has its own challenges and rewards. It so happens that I know Joan, who majored in Pre-School Education at the University of Texas at Arlington. I wonder if she might have crossed paths with your friend Jamie along the way? It's quite possible given they were at the same university, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's incredibly likely, Samuel. The world of academia is a small one after all. You know, it's such a great feeling, connecting the dots between mutual friends and acquaintances. Perhaps next time when you're free, you could join one of my wine tasting events, it would be an interesting opportunity for these paths to cross again, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"I completely agree, Hendrick. It is indeed fascinating to discover these unexpected connections. And I'd love to join a wine tasting event. I'm always up for trying new experiences, and who knows, we might find more connections! Looking forward to it.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm delighted to know you're open to it, Samuel. It will indeed be an incredible experience to discover more connections over a glass of good wine. I'll make sure to send you an invitation for our next event. It was really splendid meeting you here today.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Rafael Cortez, your task is to act/speak as Rafael Cortez would, keeping in mind Rafael Cortez's social goal.\nYou can find Rafael Cortez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Rafael Cortez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Rafael Cortez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person has put up their Bell\\'O TV Stand - Black Glass and Wood Trim for sale at $125.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. The item on sale is a beautiful 42\" Bell\\'O TV Stand, featuring black glass with an elegant wood trim. The stand measures 23 inches in height and 21 1/2 inches in depth.\nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. Personality and values description: Rafael Cortez, with his outgoing nature and competitive spirit, believes in self-direction. He employs a systematic approach to his decisions. Rafael's secrets: He cheated on his medical school exams.\nOliver Thompson's background: \nRafael Cortez's goal: You are the buyer for this item and your target price is $112.00. Be aware that you may be penalized if you purchase it for a significantly higher price than the target. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Hello Oliver, I am interested in the Bell'O TV Stand you've put up for sale. It looks like a wonderful piece of furniture. Would you consider letting it go for $112.00?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hello Rafael, I'm pleased that you have an eye for quality. The TV Stand is indeed very neat. However, how about a little adjustment? Can we settle at $120.00?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I appreciate the counteroffer, Oliver. How about we meet in the middle at $116.00? It's a bit of a stretch, but I really do like the stand.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Rafael Cortez, your task is to act/speak as Rafael Cortez would, keeping in mind Rafael Cortez's social goal.\nYou can find Rafael Cortez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Rafael Cortez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Rafael Cortez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person has put up their Bell\\'O TV Stand - Black Glass and Wood Trim for sale at $125.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. The item on sale is a beautiful 42\" Bell\\'O TV Stand, featuring black glass with an elegant wood trim. The stand measures 23 inches in height and 21 1/2 inches in depth.\nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. Personality and values description: Rafael Cortez, with his outgoing nature and competitive spirit, believes in self-direction. He employs a systematic approach to his decisions. Rafael's secrets: He cheated on his medical school exams.\nOliver Thompson's background: \nRafael Cortez's goal: You are the buyer for this item and your target price is $112.00. Be aware that you may be penalized if you purchase it for a significantly higher price than the target. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Hello Oliver, I am interested in the Bell'O TV Stand you've put up for sale. It looks like a wonderful piece of furniture. Would you consider letting it go for $112.00?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hello Rafael, I'm pleased that you have an eye for quality. The TV Stand is indeed very neat. However, how about a little adjustment? Can we settle at $120.00?\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"I appreciate the counteroffer, Oliver. How about we meet in the middle at $116.00? It's a bit of a stretch, but I really do like the stand.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"I appreciate your willingness to negotiate, Rafael. Since you truly like the stand, I can offer it for $118.00. I hope this would work for you.\"\n\nTurn #4: Rafael Cortez said: \"That's a fair compromise, Oliver. I'm willing to take the TV stand for $118.00. It's a deal.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Great, Rafael! I'm glad we came to an agreement. I'll let you know the details for pick-up or delivery. Thank you for your business.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Perfect, Oliver. I look forward to further details about pick-up or delivery. Thank you for your understanding and the delightful negotiation.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Rafael Cortez, your task is to act/speak as Rafael Cortez would, keeping in mind Rafael Cortez's social goal.\nYou can find Rafael Cortez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Rafael Cortez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Rafael Cortez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person has put up their Bell\\'O TV Stand - Black Glass and Wood Trim for sale at $125.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. The item on sale is a beautiful 42\" Bell\\'O TV Stand, featuring black glass with an elegant wood trim. The stand measures 23 inches in height and 21 1/2 inches in depth.\nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. Personality and values description: Rafael Cortez, with his outgoing nature and competitive spirit, believes in self-direction. He employs a systematic approach to his decisions. Rafael's secrets: He cheated on his medical school exams.\nOliver Thompson's background: \nRafael Cortez's goal: You are the buyer for this item and your target price is $112.00. Be aware that you may be penalized if you purchase it for a significantly higher price than the target. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Hello Oliver, I am interested in the Bell'O TV Stand you've put up for sale. It looks like a wonderful piece of furniture. Would you consider letting it go for $112.00?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hello Rafael, I'm pleased that you have an eye for quality. The TV Stand is indeed very neat. However, how about a little adjustment? Can we settle at $120.00?\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"I appreciate the counteroffer, Oliver. How about we meet in the middle at $116.00? It's a bit of a stretch, but I really do like the stand.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"I appreciate your willingness to negotiate, Rafael. Since you truly like the stand, I can offer it for $118.00. I hope this would work for you.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's a fair compromise, Oliver. I'm willing to take the TV stand for $118.00. It's a deal.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person has put up their Bell\\'O TV Stand - Black Glass and Wood Trim for sale at $125.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. The item on sale is a beautiful 42\" Bell\\'O TV Stand, featuring black glass with an elegant wood trim. The stand measures 23 inches in height and 21 1/2 inches in depth.\nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nRafael Cortez's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: You are the seller for this item, and your target price is $76.9. Please be aware that you may face a penalty if the item is sold for a price significantly lower than the target price. However, a bonus will be rewarded if you manage to sell it for more than the target price.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Hello Oliver, I am interested in the Bell'O TV Stand you've put up for sale. It looks like a wonderful piece of furniture. Would you consider letting it go for $112.00?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hello Rafael, I'm pleased that you have an eye for quality. The TV Stand is indeed very neat. However, how about a little adjustment? Can we settle at $120.00?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Rafael Cortez, your task is to act/speak as Rafael Cortez would, keeping in mind Rafael Cortez's social goal.\nYou can find Rafael Cortez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Rafael Cortez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Rafael Cortez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person has put up their Bell\\'O TV Stand - Black Glass and Wood Trim for sale at $125.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. The item on sale is a beautiful 42\" Bell\\'O TV Stand, featuring black glass with an elegant wood trim. The stand measures 23 inches in height and 21 1/2 inches in depth.\nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. Personality and values description: Rafael Cortez, with his outgoing nature and competitive spirit, believes in self-direction. He employs a systematic approach to his decisions. Rafael's secrets: He cheated on his medical school exams.\nOliver Thompson's background: \nRafael Cortez's goal: You are the buyer for this item and your target price is $112.00. Be aware that you may be penalized if you purchase it for a significantly higher price than the target. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Hello Oliver, I am interested in the Bell'O TV Stand you've put up for sale. It looks like a wonderful piece of furniture. Would you consider letting it go for $112.00?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hello Rafael, I'm pleased that you have an eye for quality. The TV Stand is indeed very neat. However, how about a little adjustment? Can we settle at $120.00?\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"I appreciate the counteroffer, Oliver. How about we meet in the middle at $116.00? It's a bit of a stretch, but I really do like the stand.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"I appreciate your willingness to negotiate, Rafael. Since you truly like the stand, I can offer it for $118.00. I hope this would work for you.\"\n\nTurn #4: Rafael Cortez said: \"That's a fair compromise, Oliver. I'm willing to take the TV stand for $118.00. It's a deal.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Great, Rafael! I'm glad we came to an agreement. I'll let you know the details for pick-up or delivery. Thank you for your business.\"\n\nTurn #6: Rafael Cortez said: \"Perfect, Oliver. I look forward to further details about pick-up or delivery. Thank you for your understanding and the delightful negotiation.\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"You're welcome, Rafael. I'm thrilled you find the negotiation delightful. I'll be in touch with the pick-up or delivery details soon. Have a great day!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person has put up their Bell\\'O TV Stand - Black Glass and Wood Trim for sale at $125.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. The item on sale is a beautiful 42\" Bell\\'O TV Stand, featuring black glass with an elegant wood trim. The stand measures 23 inches in height and 21 1/2 inches in depth.\nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nRafael Cortez's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: You are the seller for this item, and your target price is $76.9. Please be aware that you may face a penalty if the item is sold for a price significantly lower than the target price. However, a bonus will be rewarded if you manage to sell it for more than the target price.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Hello Oliver, I am interested in the Bell'O TV Stand you've put up for sale. It looks like a wonderful piece of furniture. Would you consider letting it go for $112.00?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hello Rafael, I'm pleased that you have an eye for quality. The TV Stand is indeed very neat. However, how about a little adjustment? Can we settle at $120.00?\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"I appreciate the counteroffer, Oliver. How about we meet in the middle at $116.00? It's a bit of a stretch, but I really do like the stand.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'I appreciate your willingness to negotiate, Rafael. Since you truly like the stand, I can offer it for $118.00. I hope this would work for you.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person has put up their Bell\\'O TV Stand - Black Glass and Wood Trim for sale at $125.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. The item on sale is a beautiful 42\" Bell\\'O TV Stand, featuring black glass with an elegant wood trim. The stand measures 23 inches in height and 21 1/2 inches in depth.\nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nRafael Cortez's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: You are the seller for this item, and your target price is $76.9. Please be aware that you may face a penalty if the item is sold for a price significantly lower than the target price. However, a bonus will be rewarded if you manage to sell it for more than the target price.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Hello Oliver, I am interested in the Bell'O TV Stand you've put up for sale. It looks like a wonderful piece of furniture. Would you consider letting it go for $112.00?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hello Rafael, I'm pleased that you have an eye for quality. The TV Stand is indeed very neat. However, how about a little adjustment? Can we settle at $120.00?\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"I appreciate the counteroffer, Oliver. How about we meet in the middle at $116.00? It's a bit of a stretch, but I really do like the stand.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"I appreciate your willingness to negotiate, Rafael. Since you truly like the stand, I can offer it for $118.00. I hope this would work for you.\"\n\nTurn #4: Rafael Cortez said: \"That's a fair compromise, Oliver. I'm willing to take the TV stand for $118.00. It's a deal.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Great, Rafael! I'm glad we came to an agreement. I'll let you know the details for pick-up or delivery. Thank you for your business.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person has put up their Bell\\'O TV Stand - Black Glass and Wood Trim for sale at $125.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. The item on sale is a beautiful 42\" Bell\\'O TV Stand, featuring black glass with an elegant wood trim. The stand measures 23 inches in height and 21 1/2 inches in depth.\nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nRafael Cortez's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: You are the seller for this item, and your target price is $76.9. Please be aware that you may face a penalty if the item is sold for a price significantly lower than the target price. However, a bonus will be rewarded if you manage to sell it for more than the target price.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Hello Oliver, I am interested in the Bell'O TV Stand you've put up for sale. It looks like a wonderful piece of furniture. Would you consider letting it go for $112.00?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hello Rafael, I'm pleased that you have an eye for quality. The TV Stand is indeed very neat. However, how about a little adjustment? Can we settle at $120.00?\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"I appreciate the counteroffer, Oliver. How about we meet in the middle at $116.00? It's a bit of a stretch, but I really do like the stand.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"I appreciate your willingness to negotiate, Rafael. Since you truly like the stand, I can offer it for $118.00. I hope this would work for you.\"\n\nTurn #4: Rafael Cortez said: \"That's a fair compromise, Oliver. I'm willing to take the TV stand for $118.00. It's a deal.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Great, Rafael! I'm glad we came to an agreement. I'll let you know the details for pick-up or delivery. Thank you for your business.\"\n\nTurn #6: Rafael Cortez said: \"Perfect, Oliver. I look forward to further details about pick-up or delivery. Thank you for your understanding and the delightful negotiation.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're welcome, Rafael. I'm thrilled you find the negotiation delightful. I'll be in touch with the pick-up or delivery details soon. Have a great day!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Benjamin Jackson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nBenjamin Jackson's background: \nDonovan Reeves's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMable: School: Sewanee, University of the South Company: BellSouth \nLolita: School: Winona State University Company: ONEOK \nCatherine: School: Utah Valley State College Company: Lincoln Industries \nVita: School: Winona State University Company: Erickson Air-Crane \nBrandon: School: Winona State University Company: The Greenbrier Companies \nDon: School: Clark University Company: MetLife \nAlvin: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Vectren \nTara: School: Kansas Wesleyan University Company: Gentiva Health Services \nArlene: School: Kansas Wesleyan University Company: BellSouth \n\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Benjamin, great to meet you. Just out of curiosity, have you ever spent any time in the tech industry? I've spent quite a bit of time working there myself, over at BellSouth and MetLife. They were great experiences.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Benjamin Jackson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nBenjamin Jackson's background: \nDonovan Reeves's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMable: School: Sewanee, University of the South Company: BellSouth \nLolita: School: Winona State University Company: ONEOK \nCatherine: School: Utah Valley State College Company: Lincoln Industries \nVita: School: Winona State University Company: Erickson Air-Crane \nBrandon: School: Winona State University Company: The Greenbrier Companies \nDon: School: Clark University Company: MetLife \nAlvin: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Vectren \nTara: School: Kansas Wesleyan University Company: Gentiva Health Services \nArlene: School: Kansas Wesleyan University Company: BellSouth \n\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Benjamin, great to meet you. Just out of curiosity, have you ever spent any time in the tech industry? I've spent quite a bit of time working there myself, over at BellSouth and MetLife. They were great experiences.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"It's a pleasure to meet you too, Donovan. As passionate as I am about environmental causes, I haven't really ventured into the tech industry much. But that's interesting, you worked at BellSouth, isn't that where my friend, Dave works too, and Timothy as well. Quite a small world, don't you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Definitely, it's a small world, indeed! You mentioned Dave and Timothy, I wonder if I might know them too. Possibly they know some of my friends over there. Did they go to any university in the South, or from around Kansas and Minnesota by any chance?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person has put up their Bell\\'O TV Stand - Black Glass and Wood Trim for sale at $125.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. The item on sale is a beautiful 42\" Bell\\'O TV Stand, featuring black glass with an elegant wood trim. The stand measures 23 inches in height and 21 1/2 inches in depth.\nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nRafael Cortez's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: You are the seller for this item, and your target price is $76.9. Please be aware that you may face a penalty if the item is sold for a price significantly lower than the target price. However, a bonus will be rewarded if you manage to sell it for more than the target price.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Hello Oliver, I am interested in the Bell'O TV Stand you've put up for sale. It looks like a wonderful piece of furniture. Would you consider letting it go for $112.00?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Hello Rafael, I'm pleased that you have an eye for quality. The TV Stand is indeed very neat. However, how about a little adjustment? Can we settle at $120.00?\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"I appreciate the counteroffer, Oliver. How about we meet in the middle at $116.00? It's a bit of a stretch, but I really do like the stand.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"I appreciate your willingness to negotiate, Rafael. Since you truly like the stand, I can offer it for $118.00. I hope this would work for you.\"\n\nTurn #4: Rafael Cortez said: \"That's a fair compromise, Oliver. I'm willing to take the TV stand for $118.00. It's a deal.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Great, Rafael! I'm glad we came to an agreement. I'll let you know the details for pick-up or delivery. Thank you for your business.\"\n\nTurn #6: Rafael Cortez said: \"Perfect, Oliver. I look forward to further details about pick-up or delivery. Thank you for your understanding and the delightful negotiation.\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"You're welcome, Rafael. I'm thrilled you find the negotiation delightful. I'll be in touch with the pick-up or delivery details soon. Have a great day!\"\n\nTurn #8: Rafael Cortez left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Benjamin Jackson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nBenjamin Jackson's background: \nDonovan Reeves's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMable: School: Sewanee, University of the South Company: BellSouth \nLolita: School: Winona State University Company: ONEOK \nCatherine: School: Utah Valley State College Company: Lincoln Industries \nVita: School: Winona State University Company: Erickson Air-Crane \nBrandon: School: Winona State University Company: The Greenbrier Companies \nDon: School: Clark University Company: MetLife \nAlvin: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Vectren \nTara: School: Kansas Wesleyan University Company: Gentiva Health Services \nArlene: School: Kansas Wesleyan University Company: BellSouth \n\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Benjamin, great to meet you. Just out of curiosity, have you ever spent any time in the tech industry? I've spent quite a bit of time working there myself, over at BellSouth and MetLife. They were great experiences.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"It's a pleasure to meet you too, Donovan. As passionate as I am about environmental causes, I haven't really ventured into the tech industry much. But that's interesting, you worked at BellSouth, isn't that where my friend, Dave works too, and Timothy as well. Quite a small world, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"Definitely, it's a small world, indeed! You mentioned Dave and Timothy, I wonder if I might know them too. Possibly they know some of my friends over there. Did they go to any university in the South, or from around Kansas and Minnesota by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Actually, yes. Both Dave and Timothy studied at universities in the South. Dave attended the University of the South, Sewanee if you\u2019re familiar with it. Timothy, on the other hand, studied at Louisiana State University. Maybe your paths crossed at some point during your stint at BellSouth?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Ah, the University of South, Sewanee, I rather remember that. One of my friends, Mable, also went there. Did Dave happen to know her, by any chance? She joined me later on at BellSouth for a brief period.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Benjamin Jackson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nBenjamin Jackson's background: \nDonovan Reeves's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMable: School: Sewanee, University of the South Company: BellSouth \nLolita: School: Winona State University Company: ONEOK \nCatherine: School: Utah Valley State College Company: Lincoln Industries \nVita: School: Winona State University Company: Erickson Air-Crane \nBrandon: School: Winona State University Company: The Greenbrier Companies \nDon: School: Clark University Company: MetLife \nAlvin: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Vectren \nTara: School: Kansas Wesleyan University Company: Gentiva Health Services \nArlene: School: Kansas Wesleyan University Company: BellSouth \n\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Benjamin, great to meet you. Just out of curiosity, have you ever spent any time in the tech industry? I've spent quite a bit of time working there myself, over at BellSouth and MetLife. They were great experiences.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"It's a pleasure to meet you too, Donovan. As passionate as I am about environmental causes, I haven't really ventured into the tech industry much. But that's interesting, you worked at BellSouth, isn't that where my friend, Dave works too, and Timothy as well. Quite a small world, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"Definitely, it's a small world, indeed! You mentioned Dave and Timothy, I wonder if I might know them too. Possibly they know some of my friends over there. Did they go to any university in the South, or from around Kansas and Minnesota by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Actually, yes. Both Dave and Timothy studied at universities in the South. Dave attended the University of the South, Sewanee if you\u2019re familiar with it. Timothy, on the other hand, studied at Louisiana State University. Maybe your paths crossed at some point during your stint at BellSouth?\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"Ah, the University of South, Sewanee, I rather remember that. One of my friends, Mable, also went there. Did Dave happen to know her, by any chance? She joined me later on at BellSouth for a brief period.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Yes, Dave did mention a Mable from his time at the University of the South, Sewanee. Apparently, they shared a few classes and project works together. Small world indeed, right?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's incredible! Mable and I have had quite a few interesting projects together as well. I'm glad to hear that even through the grapevine, she's remembered fondly. It truly is a small world, Benjamin.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Benjamin Jackson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nBenjamin Jackson's background: \nDonovan Reeves's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMable: School: Sewanee, University of the South Company: BellSouth \nLolita: School: Winona State University Company: ONEOK \nCatherine: School: Utah Valley State College Company: Lincoln Industries \nVita: School: Winona State University Company: Erickson Air-Crane \nBrandon: School: Winona State University Company: The Greenbrier Companies \nDon: School: Clark University Company: MetLife \nAlvin: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Vectren \nTara: School: Kansas Wesleyan University Company: Gentiva Health Services \nArlene: School: Kansas Wesleyan University Company: BellSouth \n\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Benjamin, great to meet you. Just out of curiosity, have you ever spent any time in the tech industry? I've spent quite a bit of time working there myself, over at BellSouth and MetLife. They were great experiences.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"It's a pleasure to meet you too, Donovan. As passionate as I am about environmental causes, I haven't really ventured into the tech industry much. But that's interesting, you worked at BellSouth, isn't that where my friend, Dave works too, and Timothy as well. Quite a small world, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"Definitely, it's a small world, indeed! You mentioned Dave and Timothy, I wonder if I might know them too. Possibly they know some of my friends over there. Did they go to any university in the South, or from around Kansas and Minnesota by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Actually, yes. Both Dave and Timothy studied at universities in the South. Dave attended the University of the South, Sewanee if you\u2019re familiar with it. Timothy, on the other hand, studied at Louisiana State University. Maybe your paths crossed at some point during your stint at BellSouth?\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"Ah, the University of South, Sewanee, I rather remember that. One of my friends, Mable, also went there. Did Dave happen to know her, by any chance? She joined me later on at BellSouth for a brief period.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Yes, Dave did mention a Mable from his time at the University of the South, Sewanee. Apparently, they shared a few classes and project works together. Small world indeed, right?\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"That's incredible! Mable and I have had quite a few interesting projects together as well. I'm glad to hear that even through the grapevine, she's remembered fondly. It truly is a small world, Benjamin.\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Isn't it just? Makes me wonder how many times we cross paths with people without knowing the possible connections. But speaking of connections, Donovan, have you ever worked or connected with anyone from the investment sector? Some of my associates, Leona and Stephanie for instance, are in that field. Stephanie is at Sequoia Capital and Leona works at Franklin Templeton.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I can't say I've worked in the investment sector, Benjamin. My focus has mostly been in tech-related fields, especially software development. However, I do have a friend Don who works at MetLife, an insurance company that deals with investments to an extent. I wonder if they ever crossed paths with your associates, Leona and Stephanie? Technology and investment often go hand in hand after all.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Benjamin Jackson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nBenjamin Jackson's background: \nDonovan Reeves's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMable: School: Sewanee, University of the South Company: BellSouth \nLolita: School: Winona State University Company: ONEOK \nCatherine: School: Utah Valley State College Company: Lincoln Industries \nVita: School: Winona State University Company: Erickson Air-Crane \nBrandon: School: Winona State University Company: The Greenbrier Companies \nDon: School: Clark University Company: MetLife \nAlvin: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Vectren \nTara: School: Kansas Wesleyan University Company: Gentiva Health Services \nArlene: School: Kansas Wesleyan University Company: BellSouth \n\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Benjamin, great to meet you. Just out of curiosity, have you ever spent any time in the tech industry? I've spent quite a bit of time working there myself, over at BellSouth and MetLife. They were great experiences.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"It's a pleasure to meet you too, Donovan. As passionate as I am about environmental causes, I haven't really ventured into the tech industry much. But that's interesting, you worked at BellSouth, isn't that where my friend, Dave works too, and Timothy as well. Quite a small world, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"Definitely, it's a small world, indeed! You mentioned Dave and Timothy, I wonder if I might know them too. Possibly they know some of my friends over there. Did they go to any university in the South, or from around Kansas and Minnesota by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Actually, yes. Both Dave and Timothy studied at universities in the South. Dave attended the University of the South, Sewanee if you\u2019re familiar with it. Timothy, on the other hand, studied at Louisiana State University. Maybe your paths crossed at some point during your stint at BellSouth?\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"Ah, the University of South, Sewanee, I rather remember that. One of my friends, Mable, also went there. Did Dave happen to know her, by any chance? She joined me later on at BellSouth for a brief period.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Yes, Dave did mention a Mable from his time at the University of the South, Sewanee. Apparently, they shared a few classes and project works together. Small world indeed, right?\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"That's incredible! Mable and I have had quite a few interesting projects together as well. I'm glad to hear that even through the grapevine, she's remembered fondly. It truly is a small world, Benjamin.\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Isn't it just? Makes me wonder how many times we cross paths with people without knowing the possible connections. But speaking of connections, Donovan, have you ever worked or connected with anyone from the investment sector? Some of my associates, Leona and Stephanie for instance, are in that field. Stephanie is at Sequoia Capital and Leona works at Franklin Templeton.\"\n\nTurn #8: Donovan Reeves said: \"I can't say I've worked in the investment sector, Benjamin. My focus has mostly been in tech-related fields, especially software development. However, I do have a friend Don who works at MetLife, an insurance company that deals with investments to an extent. I wonder if they ever crossed paths with your associates, Leona and Stephanie? Technology and investment often go hand in hand after all.\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's fascinating, Donovan. Both the tech and investment sectors indeed end up intertwined in many ways. In fact, even though Leona and Stephanie are primarily in investments, they've worked with tech firms on several ventures. Given your friend Don's overlap with the investment side at MetLife, it wouldn't surprise me if they've indirectly crossed paths. Isn't it curious how interconnected everyone's journeys can be?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"True, Benjamin. These unexpected ties always surprise me. It's almost as if we're all a part of an elaborate web. We're all interconnected one way or another, which makes this world feel a bit smaller and somehow cozier. It's been great learning about these mutual connections.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Benjamin Jackson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nBenjamin Jackson's background: \nDonovan Reeves's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMable: School: Sewanee, University of the South Company: BellSouth \nLolita: School: Winona State University Company: ONEOK \nCatherine: School: Utah Valley State College Company: Lincoln Industries \nVita: School: Winona State University Company: Erickson Air-Crane \nBrandon: School: Winona State University Company: The Greenbrier Companies \nDon: School: Clark University Company: MetLife \nAlvin: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Vectren \nTara: School: Kansas Wesleyan University Company: Gentiva Health Services \nArlene: School: Kansas Wesleyan University Company: BellSouth \n\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Benjamin, great to meet you. Just out of curiosity, have you ever spent any time in the tech industry? I've spent quite a bit of time working there myself, over at BellSouth and MetLife. They were great experiences.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"It's a pleasure to meet you too, Donovan. As passionate as I am about environmental causes, I haven't really ventured into the tech industry much. But that's interesting, you worked at BellSouth, isn't that where my friend, Dave works too, and Timothy as well. Quite a small world, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"Definitely, it's a small world, indeed! You mentioned Dave and Timothy, I wonder if I might know them too. Possibly they know some of my friends over there. Did they go to any university in the South, or from around Kansas and Minnesota by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Actually, yes. Both Dave and Timothy studied at universities in the South. Dave attended the University of the South, Sewanee if you\u2019re familiar with it. Timothy, on the other hand, studied at Louisiana State University. Maybe your paths crossed at some point during your stint at BellSouth?\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"Ah, the University of South, Sewanee, I rather remember that. One of my friends, Mable, also went there. Did Dave happen to know her, by any chance? She joined me later on at BellSouth for a brief period.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Yes, Dave did mention a Mable from his time at the University of the South, Sewanee. Apparently, they shared a few classes and project works together. Small world indeed, right?\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"That's incredible! Mable and I have had quite a few interesting projects together as well. I'm glad to hear that even through the grapevine, she's remembered fondly. It truly is a small world, Benjamin.\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Isn't it just? Makes me wonder how many times we cross paths with people without knowing the possible connections. But speaking of connections, Donovan, have you ever worked or connected with anyone from the investment sector? Some of my associates, Leona and Stephanie for instance, are in that field. Stephanie is at Sequoia Capital and Leona works at Franklin Templeton.\"\n\nTurn #8: Donovan Reeves said: \"I can't say I've worked in the investment sector, Benjamin. My focus has mostly been in tech-related fields, especially software development. However, I do have a friend Don who works at MetLife, an insurance company that deals with investments to an extent. I wonder if they ever crossed paths with your associates, Leona and Stephanie? Technology and investment often go hand in hand after all.\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's fascinating, Donovan. Both the tech and investment sectors indeed end up intertwined in many ways. In fact, even though Leona and Stephanie are primarily in investments, they've worked with tech firms on several ventures. Given your friend Don's overlap with the investment side at MetLife, it wouldn't surprise me if they've indirectly crossed paths. Isn't it curious how interconnected everyone's journeys can be?\"\n\nTurn #10: Donovan Reeves said: \"True, Benjamin. These unexpected ties always surprise me. It's almost as if we're all a part of an elaborate web. We're all interconnected one way or another, which makes this world feel a bit smaller and somehow cozier. It's been great learning about these mutual connections.\"\n\nTurn #11: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Indeed, Donovan. I find that notion incredibly comforting too, exploring such connections makes things feel a bit more familiar. I appreciate this delightful conversation about our shared connections. Let's keep discovering these intricate threads of interconnectedness. Who knows what more we might uncover?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Benjamin. It's these unexpected ties that make life interesting. I'm looking forward to uncovering more of these connections in the future. But for now, let's enjoy the party. Cheers!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Benjamin Jackson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nBenjamin Jackson's background: \nDonovan Reeves's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMable: School: Sewanee, University of the South Company: BellSouth \nLolita: School: Winona State University Company: ONEOK \nCatherine: School: Utah Valley State College Company: Lincoln Industries \nVita: School: Winona State University Company: Erickson Air-Crane \nBrandon: School: Winona State University Company: The Greenbrier Companies \nDon: School: Clark University Company: MetLife \nAlvin: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Vectren \nTara: School: Kansas Wesleyan University Company: Gentiva Health Services \nArlene: School: Kansas Wesleyan University Company: BellSouth \n\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Benjamin, great to meet you. Just out of curiosity, have you ever spent any time in the tech industry? I've spent quite a bit of time working there myself, over at BellSouth and MetLife. They were great experiences.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"It's a pleasure to meet you too, Donovan. As passionate as I am about environmental causes, I haven't really ventured into the tech industry much. But that's interesting, you worked at BellSouth, isn't that where my friend, Dave works too, and Timothy as well. Quite a small world, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"Definitely, it's a small world, indeed! You mentioned Dave and Timothy, I wonder if I might know them too. Possibly they know some of my friends over there. Did they go to any university in the South, or from around Kansas and Minnesota by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Actually, yes. Both Dave and Timothy studied at universities in the South. Dave attended the University of the South, Sewanee if you\u2019re familiar with it. Timothy, on the other hand, studied at Louisiana State University. Maybe your paths crossed at some point during your stint at BellSouth?\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"Ah, the University of South, Sewanee, I rather remember that. One of my friends, Mable, also went there. Did Dave happen to know her, by any chance? She joined me later on at BellSouth for a brief period.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Yes, Dave did mention a Mable from his time at the University of the South, Sewanee. Apparently, they shared a few classes and project works together. Small world indeed, right?\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"That's incredible! Mable and I have had quite a few interesting projects together as well. I'm glad to hear that even through the grapevine, she's remembered fondly. It truly is a small world, Benjamin.\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Isn't it just? Makes me wonder how many times we cross paths with people without knowing the possible connections. But speaking of connections, Donovan, have you ever worked or connected with anyone from the investment sector? Some of my associates, Leona and Stephanie for instance, are in that field. Stephanie is at Sequoia Capital and Leona works at Franklin Templeton.\"\n\nTurn #8: Donovan Reeves said: \"I can't say I've worked in the investment sector, Benjamin. My focus has mostly been in tech-related fields, especially software development. However, I do have a friend Don who works at MetLife, an insurance company that deals with investments to an extent. I wonder if they ever crossed paths with your associates, Leona and Stephanie? Technology and investment often go hand in hand after all.\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's fascinating, Donovan. Both the tech and investment sectors indeed end up intertwined in many ways. In fact, even though Leona and Stephanie are primarily in investments, they've worked with tech firms on several ventures. Given your friend Don's overlap with the investment side at MetLife, it wouldn't surprise me if they've indirectly crossed paths. Isn't it curious how interconnected everyone's journeys can be?\"\n\nTurn #10: Donovan Reeves said: \"True, Benjamin. These unexpected ties always surprise me. It's almost as if we're all a part of an elaborate web. We're all interconnected one way or another, which makes this world feel a bit smaller and somehow cozier. It's been great learning about these mutual connections.\"\n\nTurn #11: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Indeed, Donovan. I find that notion incredibly comforting too, exploring such connections makes things feel a bit more familiar. I appreciate this delightful conversation about our shared connections. Let's keep discovering these intricate threads of interconnectedness. Who knows what more we might uncover?\"\n\nTurn #12: Donovan Reeves said: \"Absolutely, Benjamin. It's these unexpected ties that make life interesting. I'm looking forward to uncovering more of these connections in the future. But for now, let's enjoy the party. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #13: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Definitely, Donovan. 'Til the threads of our stories intertwine once again. For now, let's make the most out of the night. Cheers!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Benjamin Jackson\nDonovan Reeves's background: \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDave: School: Sewanee, University of the South Company: BellSouth \nTimothy: School: Louisiana State University Company: BellSouth \nLeona: School: Coe College Company: Franklin Templeton \nAlvin: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Vectren \nKarissa: School: Saint John's University Company: U.S. Venture Partners \nStephanie: School: Coe College Company: Sequoia Capital \nKathy: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Estes Industries \nMonica: School: Coe College Company: The Greenbrier Companies \nBlanche: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Oakley, Inc.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Benjamin, great to meet you. Just out of curiosity, have you ever spent any time in the tech industry? I've spent quite a bit of time working there myself, over at BellSouth and MetLife. They were great experiences.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"It's a pleasure to meet you too, Donovan. As passionate as I am about environmental causes, I haven't really ventured into the tech industry much. But that's interesting, you worked at BellSouth, isn't that where my friend, Dave works too, and Timothy as well. Quite a small world, don't you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Benjamin Jackson\nDonovan Reeves's background: \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDave: School: Sewanee, University of the South Company: BellSouth \nTimothy: School: Louisiana State University Company: BellSouth \nLeona: School: Coe College Company: Franklin Templeton \nAlvin: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Vectren \nKarissa: School: Saint John's University Company: U.S. Venture Partners \nStephanie: School: Coe College Company: Sequoia Capital \nKathy: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Estes Industries \nMonica: School: Coe College Company: The Greenbrier Companies \nBlanche: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Oakley, Inc.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Benjamin, great to meet you. Just out of curiosity, have you ever spent any time in the tech industry? I've spent quite a bit of time working there myself, over at BellSouth and MetLife. They were great experiences.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"It's a pleasure to meet you too, Donovan. As passionate as I am about environmental causes, I haven't really ventured into the tech industry much. But that's interesting, you worked at BellSouth, isn't that where my friend, Dave works too, and Timothy as well. Quite a small world, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"Definitely, it's a small world, indeed! You mentioned Dave and Timothy, I wonder if I might know them too. Possibly they know some of my friends over there. Did they go to any university in the South, or from around Kansas and Minnesota by any chance?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Actually, yes. Both Dave and Timothy studied at universities in the South. Dave attended the University of the South, Sewanee if you\u2019re familiar with it. Timothy, on the other hand, studied at Louisiana State University. Maybe your paths crossed at some point during your stint at BellSouth?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Benjamin Jackson\nDonovan Reeves's background: \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDave: School: Sewanee, University of the South Company: BellSouth \nTimothy: School: Louisiana State University Company: BellSouth \nLeona: School: Coe College Company: Franklin Templeton \nAlvin: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Vectren \nKarissa: School: Saint John's University Company: U.S. Venture Partners \nStephanie: School: Coe College Company: Sequoia Capital \nKathy: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Estes Industries \nMonica: School: Coe College Company: The Greenbrier Companies \nBlanche: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Oakley, Inc.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Benjamin, great to meet you. Just out of curiosity, have you ever spent any time in the tech industry? I've spent quite a bit of time working there myself, over at BellSouth and MetLife. They were great experiences.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"It's a pleasure to meet you too, Donovan. As passionate as I am about environmental causes, I haven't really ventured into the tech industry much. But that's interesting, you worked at BellSouth, isn't that where my friend, Dave works too, and Timothy as well. Quite a small world, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"Definitely, it's a small world, indeed! You mentioned Dave and Timothy, I wonder if I might know them too. Possibly they know some of my friends over there. Did they go to any university in the South, or from around Kansas and Minnesota by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Actually, yes. Both Dave and Timothy studied at universities in the South. Dave attended the University of the South, Sewanee if you\u2019re familiar with it. Timothy, on the other hand, studied at Louisiana State University. Maybe your paths crossed at some point during your stint at BellSouth?\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"Ah, the University of South, Sewanee, I rather remember that. One of my friends, Mable, also went there. Did Dave happen to know her, by any chance? She joined me later on at BellSouth for a brief period.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Yes, Dave did mention a Mable from his time at the University of the South, Sewanee. Apparently, they shared a few classes and project works together. Small world indeed, right?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Benjamin Jackson\nDonovan Reeves's background: \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDave: School: Sewanee, University of the South Company: BellSouth \nTimothy: School: Louisiana State University Company: BellSouth \nLeona: School: Coe College Company: Franklin Templeton \nAlvin: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Vectren \nKarissa: School: Saint John's University Company: U.S. Venture Partners \nStephanie: School: Coe College Company: Sequoia Capital \nKathy: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Estes Industries \nMonica: School: Coe College Company: The Greenbrier Companies \nBlanche: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Oakley, Inc.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Benjamin, great to meet you. Just out of curiosity, have you ever spent any time in the tech industry? I've spent quite a bit of time working there myself, over at BellSouth and MetLife. They were great experiences.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"It's a pleasure to meet you too, Donovan. As passionate as I am about environmental causes, I haven't really ventured into the tech industry much. But that's interesting, you worked at BellSouth, isn't that where my friend, Dave works too, and Timothy as well. Quite a small world, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"Definitely, it's a small world, indeed! You mentioned Dave and Timothy, I wonder if I might know them too. Possibly they know some of my friends over there. Did they go to any university in the South, or from around Kansas and Minnesota by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Actually, yes. Both Dave and Timothy studied at universities in the South. Dave attended the University of the South, Sewanee if you\u2019re familiar with it. Timothy, on the other hand, studied at Louisiana State University. Maybe your paths crossed at some point during your stint at BellSouth?\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"Ah, the University of South, Sewanee, I rather remember that. One of my friends, Mable, also went there. Did Dave happen to know her, by any chance? She joined me later on at BellSouth for a brief period.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Yes, Dave did mention a Mable from his time at the University of the South, Sewanee. Apparently, they shared a few classes and project works together. Small world indeed, right?\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"That's incredible! Mable and I have had quite a few interesting projects together as well. I'm glad to hear that even through the grapevine, she's remembered fondly. It truly is a small world, Benjamin.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Isn't it just? Makes me wonder how many times we cross paths with people without knowing the possible connections. But speaking of connections, Donovan, have you ever worked or connected with anyone from the investment sector? Some of my associates, Leona and Stephanie for instance, are in that field. Stephanie is at Sequoia Capital and Leona works at Franklin Templeton.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Benjamin Jackson\nDonovan Reeves's background: \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDave: School: Sewanee, University of the South Company: BellSouth \nTimothy: School: Louisiana State University Company: BellSouth \nLeona: School: Coe College Company: Franklin Templeton \nAlvin: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Vectren \nKarissa: School: Saint John's University Company: U.S. Venture Partners \nStephanie: School: Coe College Company: Sequoia Capital \nKathy: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Estes Industries \nMonica: School: Coe College Company: The Greenbrier Companies \nBlanche: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Oakley, Inc.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Benjamin, great to meet you. Just out of curiosity, have you ever spent any time in the tech industry? I've spent quite a bit of time working there myself, over at BellSouth and MetLife. They were great experiences.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"It's a pleasure to meet you too, Donovan. As passionate as I am about environmental causes, I haven't really ventured into the tech industry much. But that's interesting, you worked at BellSouth, isn't that where my friend, Dave works too, and Timothy as well. Quite a small world, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"Definitely, it's a small world, indeed! You mentioned Dave and Timothy, I wonder if I might know them too. Possibly they know some of my friends over there. Did they go to any university in the South, or from around Kansas and Minnesota by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Actually, yes. Both Dave and Timothy studied at universities in the South. Dave attended the University of the South, Sewanee if you\u2019re familiar with it. Timothy, on the other hand, studied at Louisiana State University. Maybe your paths crossed at some point during your stint at BellSouth?\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"Ah, the University of South, Sewanee, I rather remember that. One of my friends, Mable, also went there. Did Dave happen to know her, by any chance? She joined me later on at BellSouth for a brief period.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Yes, Dave did mention a Mable from his time at the University of the South, Sewanee. Apparently, they shared a few classes and project works together. Small world indeed, right?\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"That's incredible! Mable and I have had quite a few interesting projects together as well. I'm glad to hear that even through the grapevine, she's remembered fondly. It truly is a small world, Benjamin.\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Isn't it just? Makes me wonder how many times we cross paths with people without knowing the possible connections. But speaking of connections, Donovan, have you ever worked or connected with anyone from the investment sector? Some of my associates, Leona and Stephanie for instance, are in that field. Stephanie is at Sequoia Capital and Leona works at Franklin Templeton.\"\n\nTurn #8: Donovan Reeves said: \"I can't say I've worked in the investment sector, Benjamin. My focus has mostly been in tech-related fields, especially software development. However, I do have a friend Don who works at MetLife, an insurance company that deals with investments to an extent. I wonder if they ever crossed paths with your associates, Leona and Stephanie? Technology and investment often go hand in hand after all.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's fascinating, Donovan. Both the tech and investment sectors indeed end up intertwined in many ways. In fact, even though Leona and Stephanie are primarily in investments, they've worked with tech firms on several ventures. Given your friend Don's overlap with the investment side at MetLife, it wouldn't surprise me if they've indirectly crossed paths. Isn't it curious how interconnected everyone's journeys can be?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Benjamin Jackson\nDonovan Reeves's background: \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDave: School: Sewanee, University of the South Company: BellSouth \nTimothy: School: Louisiana State University Company: BellSouth \nLeona: School: Coe College Company: Franklin Templeton \nAlvin: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Vectren \nKarissa: School: Saint John's University Company: U.S. Venture Partners \nStephanie: School: Coe College Company: Sequoia Capital \nKathy: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Estes Industries \nMonica: School: Coe College Company: The Greenbrier Companies \nBlanche: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Oakley, Inc.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Benjamin, great to meet you. Just out of curiosity, have you ever spent any time in the tech industry? I've spent quite a bit of time working there myself, over at BellSouth and MetLife. They were great experiences.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"It's a pleasure to meet you too, Donovan. As passionate as I am about environmental causes, I haven't really ventured into the tech industry much. But that's interesting, you worked at BellSouth, isn't that where my friend, Dave works too, and Timothy as well. Quite a small world, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"Definitely, it's a small world, indeed! You mentioned Dave and Timothy, I wonder if I might know them too. Possibly they know some of my friends over there. Did they go to any university in the South, or from around Kansas and Minnesota by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Actually, yes. Both Dave and Timothy studied at universities in the South. Dave attended the University of the South, Sewanee if you\u2019re familiar with it. Timothy, on the other hand, studied at Louisiana State University. Maybe your paths crossed at some point during your stint at BellSouth?\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"Ah, the University of South, Sewanee, I rather remember that. One of my friends, Mable, also went there. Did Dave happen to know her, by any chance? She joined me later on at BellSouth for a brief period.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Yes, Dave did mention a Mable from his time at the University of the South, Sewanee. Apparently, they shared a few classes and project works together. Small world indeed, right?\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"That's incredible! Mable and I have had quite a few interesting projects together as well. I'm glad to hear that even through the grapevine, she's remembered fondly. It truly is a small world, Benjamin.\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Isn't it just? Makes me wonder how many times we cross paths with people without knowing the possible connections. But speaking of connections, Donovan, have you ever worked or connected with anyone from the investment sector? Some of my associates, Leona and Stephanie for instance, are in that field. Stephanie is at Sequoia Capital and Leona works at Franklin Templeton.\"\n\nTurn #8: Donovan Reeves said: \"I can't say I've worked in the investment sector, Benjamin. My focus has mostly been in tech-related fields, especially software development. However, I do have a friend Don who works at MetLife, an insurance company that deals with investments to an extent. I wonder if they ever crossed paths with your associates, Leona and Stephanie? Technology and investment often go hand in hand after all.\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's fascinating, Donovan. Both the tech and investment sectors indeed end up intertwined in many ways. In fact, even though Leona and Stephanie are primarily in investments, they've worked with tech firms on several ventures. Given your friend Don's overlap with the investment side at MetLife, it wouldn't surprise me if they've indirectly crossed paths. Isn't it curious how interconnected everyone's journeys can be?\"\n\nTurn #10: Donovan Reeves said: \"True, Benjamin. These unexpected ties always surprise me. It's almost as if we're all a part of an elaborate web. We're all interconnected one way or another, which makes this world feel a bit smaller and somehow cozier. It's been great learning about these mutual connections.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, Donovan. I find that notion incredibly comforting too, exploring such connections makes things feel a bit more familiar. I appreciate this delightful conversation about our shared connections. Let's keep discovering these intricate threads of interconnectedness. Who knows what more we might uncover?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Benjamin Jackson\nDonovan Reeves's background: \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDave: School: Sewanee, University of the South Company: BellSouth \nTimothy: School: Louisiana State University Company: BellSouth \nLeona: School: Coe College Company: Franklin Templeton \nAlvin: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Vectren \nKarissa: School: Saint John's University Company: U.S. Venture Partners \nStephanie: School: Coe College Company: Sequoia Capital \nKathy: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Estes Industries \nMonica: School: Coe College Company: The Greenbrier Companies \nBlanche: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Oakley, Inc.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Benjamin, great to meet you. Just out of curiosity, have you ever spent any time in the tech industry? I've spent quite a bit of time working there myself, over at BellSouth and MetLife. They were great experiences.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"It's a pleasure to meet you too, Donovan. As passionate as I am about environmental causes, I haven't really ventured into the tech industry much. But that's interesting, you worked at BellSouth, isn't that where my friend, Dave works too, and Timothy as well. Quite a small world, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"Definitely, it's a small world, indeed! You mentioned Dave and Timothy, I wonder if I might know them too. Possibly they know some of my friends over there. Did they go to any university in the South, or from around Kansas and Minnesota by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Actually, yes. Both Dave and Timothy studied at universities in the South. Dave attended the University of the South, Sewanee if you\u2019re familiar with it. Timothy, on the other hand, studied at Louisiana State University. Maybe your paths crossed at some point during your stint at BellSouth?\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"Ah, the University of South, Sewanee, I rather remember that. One of my friends, Mable, also went there. Did Dave happen to know her, by any chance? She joined me later on at BellSouth for a brief period.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Yes, Dave did mention a Mable from his time at the University of the South, Sewanee. Apparently, they shared a few classes and project works together. Small world indeed, right?\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"That's incredible! Mable and I have had quite a few interesting projects together as well. I'm glad to hear that even through the grapevine, she's remembered fondly. It truly is a small world, Benjamin.\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Isn't it just? Makes me wonder how many times we cross paths with people without knowing the possible connections. But speaking of connections, Donovan, have you ever worked or connected with anyone from the investment sector? Some of my associates, Leona and Stephanie for instance, are in that field. Stephanie is at Sequoia Capital and Leona works at Franklin Templeton.\"\n\nTurn #8: Donovan Reeves said: \"I can't say I've worked in the investment sector, Benjamin. My focus has mostly been in tech-related fields, especially software development. However, I do have a friend Don who works at MetLife, an insurance company that deals with investments to an extent. I wonder if they ever crossed paths with your associates, Leona and Stephanie? Technology and investment often go hand in hand after all.\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's fascinating, Donovan. Both the tech and investment sectors indeed end up intertwined in many ways. In fact, even though Leona and Stephanie are primarily in investments, they've worked with tech firms on several ventures. Given your friend Don's overlap with the investment side at MetLife, it wouldn't surprise me if they've indirectly crossed paths. Isn't it curious how interconnected everyone's journeys can be?\"\n\nTurn #10: Donovan Reeves said: \"True, Benjamin. These unexpected ties always surprise me. It's almost as if we're all a part of an elaborate web. We're all interconnected one way or another, which makes this world feel a bit smaller and somehow cozier. It's been great learning about these mutual connections.\"\n\nTurn #11: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Indeed, Donovan. I find that notion incredibly comforting too, exploring such connections makes things feel a bit more familiar. I appreciate this delightful conversation about our shared connections. Let's keep discovering these intricate threads of interconnectedness. Who knows what more we might uncover?\"\n\nTurn #12: Donovan Reeves said: \"Absolutely, Benjamin. It's these unexpected ties that make life interesting. I'm looking forward to uncovering more of these connections in the future. But for now, let's enjoy the party. Cheers!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Definitely, Donovan. 'Til the threads of our stories intertwine once again. For now, let's make the most out of the night. Cheers!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Benjamin Jackson\nDonovan Reeves's background: \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDave: School: Sewanee, University of the South Company: BellSouth \nTimothy: School: Louisiana State University Company: BellSouth \nLeona: School: Coe College Company: Franklin Templeton \nAlvin: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Vectren \nKarissa: School: Saint John's University Company: U.S. Venture Partners \nStephanie: School: Coe College Company: Sequoia Capital \nKathy: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Estes Industries \nMonica: School: Coe College Company: The Greenbrier Companies \nBlanche: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Oakley, Inc.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey Benjamin, great to meet you. Just out of curiosity, have you ever spent any time in the tech industry? I've spent quite a bit of time working there myself, over at BellSouth and MetLife. They were great experiences.\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"It's a pleasure to meet you too, Donovan. As passionate as I am about environmental causes, I haven't really ventured into the tech industry much. But that's interesting, you worked at BellSouth, isn't that where my friend, Dave works too, and Timothy as well. Quite a small world, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"Definitely, it's a small world, indeed! You mentioned Dave and Timothy, I wonder if I might know them too. Possibly they know some of my friends over there. Did they go to any university in the South, or from around Kansas and Minnesota by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Actually, yes. Both Dave and Timothy studied at universities in the South. Dave attended the University of the South, Sewanee if you\u2019re familiar with it. Timothy, on the other hand, studied at Louisiana State University. Maybe your paths crossed at some point during your stint at BellSouth?\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"Ah, the University of South, Sewanee, I rather remember that. One of my friends, Mable, also went there. Did Dave happen to know her, by any chance? She joined me later on at BellSouth for a brief period.\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Yes, Dave did mention a Mable from his time at the University of the South, Sewanee. Apparently, they shared a few classes and project works together. Small world indeed, right?\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves said: \"That's incredible! Mable and I have had quite a few interesting projects together as well. I'm glad to hear that even through the grapevine, she's remembered fondly. It truly is a small world, Benjamin.\"\n\nTurn #7: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Isn't it just? Makes me wonder how many times we cross paths with people without knowing the possible connections. But speaking of connections, Donovan, have you ever worked or connected with anyone from the investment sector? Some of my associates, Leona and Stephanie for instance, are in that field. Stephanie is at Sequoia Capital and Leona works at Franklin Templeton.\"\n\nTurn #8: Donovan Reeves said: \"I can't say I've worked in the investment sector, Benjamin. My focus has mostly been in tech-related fields, especially software development. However, I do have a friend Don who works at MetLife, an insurance company that deals with investments to an extent. I wonder if they ever crossed paths with your associates, Leona and Stephanie? Technology and investment often go hand in hand after all.\"\n\nTurn #9: Benjamin Jackson said: \"That's fascinating, Donovan. Both the tech and investment sectors indeed end up intertwined in many ways. In fact, even though Leona and Stephanie are primarily in investments, they've worked with tech firms on several ventures. Given your friend Don's overlap with the investment side at MetLife, it wouldn't surprise me if they've indirectly crossed paths. Isn't it curious how interconnected everyone's journeys can be?\"\n\nTurn #10: Donovan Reeves said: \"True, Benjamin. These unexpected ties always surprise me. It's almost as if we're all a part of an elaborate web. We're all interconnected one way or another, which makes this world feel a bit smaller and somehow cozier. It's been great learning about these mutual connections.\"\n\nTurn #11: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Indeed, Donovan. I find that notion incredibly comforting too, exploring such connections makes things feel a bit more familiar. I appreciate this delightful conversation about our shared connections. Let's keep discovering these intricate threads of interconnectedness. Who knows what more we might uncover?\"\n\nTurn #12: Donovan Reeves said: \"Absolutely, Benjamin. It's these unexpected ties that make life interesting. I'm looking forward to uncovering more of these connections in the future. But for now, let's enjoy the party. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #13: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Definitely, Donovan. 'Til the threads of our stories intertwine once again. For now, let's make the most out of the night. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #14: Donovan Reeves left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Rafael Cortez, your task is to act/speak as Rafael Cortez would, keeping in mind Rafael Cortez's social goal.\nYou can find Rafael Cortez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Rafael Cortez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Rafael Cortez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. Personality and values description: Rafael Cortez, with his outgoing nature and competitive spirit, believes in self-direction. He employs a systematic approach to his decisions. Rafael's secrets: He cheated on his medical school exams.\nOliver Thompson's background: \nRafael Cortez's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDavid: Hobby: Vacation Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nChristopher: Hobby: Go Company: McKinsey & Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nLee: Hobby: Go Company: Groupon Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPamela: Hobby: Watching television Company: General Cable Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nPhillip: Hobby: Kayaking Company: Sauer-Danfoss Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nKristin: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nRafael: Hobby: Kayaking Company: General Cable Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nChad: Hobby: Foreign language learning Company: General Cable Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPhil: Hobby: Kayaking Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nConnie: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: General Cable Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nTommy: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \n\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Good evening! I'm Rafael, a surgeon with a penchant for vintage medical memorabilia. And you are?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Rafael Cortez, your task is to act/speak as Rafael Cortez would, keeping in mind Rafael Cortez's social goal.\nYou can find Rafael Cortez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Rafael Cortez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Rafael Cortez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. Personality and values description: Rafael Cortez, with his outgoing nature and competitive spirit, believes in self-direction. He employs a systematic approach to his decisions. Rafael's secrets: He cheated on his medical school exams.\nOliver Thompson's background: \nRafael Cortez's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDavid: Hobby: Vacation Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nChristopher: Hobby: Go Company: McKinsey & Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nLee: Hobby: Go Company: Groupon Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPamela: Hobby: Watching television Company: General Cable Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nPhillip: Hobby: Kayaking Company: Sauer-Danfoss Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nKristin: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nRafael: Hobby: Kayaking Company: General Cable Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nChad: Hobby: Foreign language learning Company: General Cable Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPhil: Hobby: Kayaking Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nConnie: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: General Cable Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nTommy: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \n\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening! I'm Rafael, a surgeon with a penchant for vintage medical memorabilia. And you are?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Pleasure to meet you, Rafael! I'm Oliver, an architect who enjoys expressing creativity through painting in my free time. Vintage medical memorabilia sounds fascinating! Do you engage in any outdoor activities by any chance?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sure do, Oliver! I'm extremely fond of kayaking. It's a complete departure from my routine, you know, quite invigorating! One of my friends, Phil, is also quite the enthusiast. We often head out for a paddle in the evenings. Quite by chance, do you happen to know him? He works at H. J. Heinz Company.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Rafael Cortez, your task is to act/speak as Rafael Cortez would, keeping in mind Rafael Cortez's social goal.\nYou can find Rafael Cortez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Rafael Cortez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Rafael Cortez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. Personality and values description: Rafael Cortez, with his outgoing nature and competitive spirit, believes in self-direction. He employs a systematic approach to his decisions. Rafael's secrets: He cheated on his medical school exams.\nOliver Thompson's background: \nRafael Cortez's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDavid: Hobby: Vacation Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nChristopher: Hobby: Go Company: McKinsey & Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nLee: Hobby: Go Company: Groupon Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPamela: Hobby: Watching television Company: General Cable Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nPhillip: Hobby: Kayaking Company: Sauer-Danfoss Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nKristin: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nRafael: Hobby: Kayaking Company: General Cable Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nChad: Hobby: Foreign language learning Company: General Cable Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPhil: Hobby: Kayaking Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nConnie: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: General Cable Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nTommy: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \n\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening! I'm Rafael, a surgeon with a penchant for vintage medical memorabilia. And you are?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Pleasure to meet you, Rafael! I'm Oliver, an architect who enjoys expressing creativity through painting in my free time. Vintage medical memorabilia sounds fascinating! Do you engage in any outdoor activities by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Sure do, Oliver! I'm extremely fond of kayaking. It's a complete departure from my routine, you know, quite invigorating! One of my friends, Phil, is also quite the enthusiast. We often head out for a paddle in the evenings. Quite by chance, do you happen to know him? He works at H. J. Heinz Company.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"I'm afraid I don't know a Phil from H. J. Heinz Company. However, it's interesting to know you love kayaking. I have another friend who enjoys kayaking too and he prefers to do it in the morning. I wonder if you know him, his name is Rafael, and he works at General Cable. \"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's quite a coincidence, Rafael. Besides, I found that I tend to be more creative and productive in the morning, no wonder my friend Rafael prefers to do his kayaking in the morning as well. Do you know any morning people who have outdoor hobbies too?\"\n\nTurn #6: Rafael Cortez said: \"The early bird does catch the worm, as they say! My friend Tommy could attest to that. Like your friend Rafael, Tommy is a morning person who enjoys spending his outdoor time indulging his hobby of animal fancy. He works for H. J. Heinz, does that ring any bells?\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ah, Tommy from H. J. Heinz...unfortunately, I don't think I know him either. But it seems like we might have a wider circle of friends than we realize. By the way, Rafael, do you happen to know a lady named Tina? She loves lace-making and is a morning person who enjoys her hobby outdoors. She works for a pretty popular internet company called Groupon.\"\n\nTurn #8: Rafael Cortez said: \"Although I don't know a Tina who is into lace-making, Oliver, it's interesting that you mentioned Groupon. A friend of mine, Lee, is also associated with Groupon and his hobby is playing Go. It's an indoor hobby though and unlike your friend Tina, he favors evenings. Could they possibly know each other?\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ah, I see. While I don't personally know a Lee from Groupon, given the size and culture of such a company, it's highly likely that Tina and Lee might have crossed paths at some point. It's fascinating how these company connections work, isn't it? Speaking of companies, I have a friend, Raymond, who works at the Chicago Bridge & Iron Company. He loves foraging and usually does so in the morning, outdoors. Have you ever met him?\"\n\nTurn #10: Rafael Cortez said: \"I'm afraid I haven't met your friend Raymond from the Chicago Bridge & Iron Company, although I am appreciating amidst this conversation that our circles might have some overlaps, quite intriguing! On another note, Oliver, do you perhaps know a lady named Pamela? She spends her afternoons indulging in watching television and is associated with General Cable.\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Thompson said: \"Pamela from General Cable, you say? I don't think I've met her, but if she happens to know a Rafael from the same company who loves to kayak in the mornings, perhaps they do share a mutual connection! By the way, Rafael, do you know a Frances? She's into foraging, works for Expedia and tends to indulge in her hobby in the morning, indoors.\"\n\nTurn #12: Rafael Cortez said: \"As it happens, Oliver, I don't know a Frances who fits your description. However, it's interesting you mention foraging. I have a friend, Kristin, who enjoys a hobby slightly different than foraging, she's an animal fancy enthusiast. She spends afternoons indoors and works at the H. J. Heinz Company. Would she perchance know your friend Raymond? It's amazing how intertwined the world can be!\"\n\nTurn #13: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, Rafael, it is absolutely fascinating! I do not know if Raymond knows Kristin but given they both are in the same city, there is definitely a possibility of overlapping hobbies or career circles. It's truly a small world! By the way, do you know a Scott who works at Expedia and is into gaming? He prefers to indulge in his hobby in the afternoon, indoors.\"\n\nTurn #14: Rafael Cortez said: \"I'm afraid I don't personally know Scott from Expedia, but the coincidences we're finding are truly fascinating, Oliver! Speaking of gaming, a friend of mine, Christopher, is also into games. He plays Go rather than video games, and he, like Scott, enjoys his hobby in the evenings indoors. He's associated with McKinsey & Company. Does Christopher's name ring any bells with you by chance?\"\n\nTurn #15: Oliver Thompson said: \"Christopher from McKinsey & Company... no, I'm afraid I don't know him personally. But it's interesting that he shares a love for gaming, just like Scott. Suddenly, it feels like it's a bit smaller world with all these overlaps, doesn't it? Moving to a slightly different interest, do you by any chance know my friend Wanda? She works at Sauer-Danfoss, loves weightlifting, and also enjoys early mornings outdoors - quite a unique combination, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #16: Rafael Cortez said: \"Quite a combination indeed, Oliver! Wanda seems like an interesting character. Though I don't personally know her, her passion for weightlifting reminds me of my friend Phillip, he enjoys kayaking and works at Sauer-Danfoss. He prefers the afternoon for his outdoor activities, however. Could they know each other, given their shared workplace?\"\n\nTurn #17: Oliver Thompson said: \"It seems quite possible, Rafael, given their shared workplace and love for outdoor activities. After all, we never know how closely our circles might intersect! Speaking of intersecting circles, I have a friend named Robin who is into gaming and works at L. W. Seecamp Company. She enjoys her hobby in the evenings, outside. I wonder if they have crossed paths with your friend Christopher from McKinsey & Company who is also into games?\"\n\nTurn #18: Rafael Cortez said: \"A gaming enthusiast at L. W. Seecamp Company, you say? Regrettably, I don't know her personally. And while Christopher is indeed a gaming enthusiast, his preference is for the game of Go and he likes to spend his evenings indoors. I wonder if that resonates with your friend Robin's experiences. It's truly fascinating how our networks may overlap in unexpected ways, isn't it, Oliver?\"\n\nTurn #19: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Rafael, it's truly a rhyme of life! By the way, I have another friend named James who works at a trendy retail company, Urban Outfitters. He enjoys vacationing and usually does that in the morning, preferably outdoors. Could it be possible that you guys share a mutual connection?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #20. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's a possibility, Oliver. I have a friend named David who works at H. J. Heinz Company and his preferred time for vacationing, much like your friend James, is in the evening though. Their mutual love for vacationing might have brought them together at some point. The connections we discover are indeed captivating!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Rafael Cortez, your task is to act/speak as Rafael Cortez would, keeping in mind Rafael Cortez's social goal.\nYou can find Rafael Cortez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Rafael Cortez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Rafael Cortez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. Personality and values description: Rafael Cortez, with his outgoing nature and competitive spirit, believes in self-direction. He employs a systematic approach to his decisions. Rafael's secrets: He cheated on his medical school exams.\nOliver Thompson's background: \nRafael Cortez's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDavid: Hobby: Vacation Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nChristopher: Hobby: Go Company: McKinsey & Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nLee: Hobby: Go Company: Groupon Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPamela: Hobby: Watching television Company: General Cable Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nPhillip: Hobby: Kayaking Company: Sauer-Danfoss Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nKristin: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nRafael: Hobby: Kayaking Company: General Cable Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nChad: Hobby: Foreign language learning Company: General Cable Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPhil: Hobby: Kayaking Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nConnie: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: General Cable Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nTommy: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \n\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening! I'm Rafael, a surgeon with a penchant for vintage medical memorabilia. And you are?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Pleasure to meet you, Rafael! I'm Oliver, an architect who enjoys expressing creativity through painting in my free time. Vintage medical memorabilia sounds fascinating! Do you engage in any outdoor activities by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Sure do, Oliver! I'm extremely fond of kayaking. It's a complete departure from my routine, you know, quite invigorating! One of my friends, Phil, is also quite the enthusiast. We often head out for a paddle in the evenings. Quite by chance, do you happen to know him? He works at H. J. Heinz Company.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"I'm afraid I don't know a Phil from H. J. Heinz Company. However, it's interesting to know you love kayaking. I have another friend who enjoys kayaking too and he prefers to do it in the morning. I wonder if you know him, his name is Rafael, and he works at General Cable. \"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Rafael Cortez, your task is to act/speak as Rafael Cortez would, keeping in mind Rafael Cortez's social goal.\nYou can find Rafael Cortez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Rafael Cortez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Rafael Cortez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. Personality and values description: Rafael Cortez, with his outgoing nature and competitive spirit, believes in self-direction. He employs a systematic approach to his decisions. Rafael's secrets: He cheated on his medical school exams.\nOliver Thompson's background: \nRafael Cortez's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDavid: Hobby: Vacation Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nChristopher: Hobby: Go Company: McKinsey & Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nLee: Hobby: Go Company: Groupon Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPamela: Hobby: Watching television Company: General Cable Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nPhillip: Hobby: Kayaking Company: Sauer-Danfoss Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nKristin: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nRafael: Hobby: Kayaking Company: General Cable Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nChad: Hobby: Foreign language learning Company: General Cable Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPhil: Hobby: Kayaking Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nConnie: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: General Cable Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nTommy: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \n\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening! I'm Rafael, a surgeon with a penchant for vintage medical memorabilia. And you are?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Pleasure to meet you, Rafael! I'm Oliver, an architect who enjoys expressing creativity through painting in my free time. Vintage medical memorabilia sounds fascinating! Do you engage in any outdoor activities by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Sure do, Oliver! I'm extremely fond of kayaking. It's a complete departure from my routine, you know, quite invigorating! One of my friends, Phil, is also quite the enthusiast. We often head out for a paddle in the evenings. Quite by chance, do you happen to know him? He works at H. J. Heinz Company.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"I'm afraid I don't know a Phil from H. J. Heinz Company. However, it's interesting to know you love kayaking. I have another friend who enjoys kayaking too and he prefers to do it in the morning. I wonder if you know him, his name is Rafael, and he works at General Cable. \"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's quite a coincidence, Rafael. Besides, I found that I tend to be more creative and productive in the morning, no wonder my friend Rafael prefers to do his kayaking in the morning as well. Do you know any morning people who have outdoor hobbies too?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'The early bird does catch the worm, as they say! My friend Tommy could attest to that. Like your friend Rafael, Tommy is a morning person who enjoys spending his outdoor time indulging his hobby of animal fancy. He works for H. J. Heinz, does that ring any bells?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Rafael Cortez, your task is to act/speak as Rafael Cortez would, keeping in mind Rafael Cortez's social goal.\nYou can find Rafael Cortez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Rafael Cortez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Rafael Cortez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. Personality and values description: Rafael Cortez, with his outgoing nature and competitive spirit, believes in self-direction. He employs a systematic approach to his decisions. Rafael's secrets: He cheated on his medical school exams.\nOliver Thompson's background: \nRafael Cortez's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDavid: Hobby: Vacation Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nChristopher: Hobby: Go Company: McKinsey & Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nLee: Hobby: Go Company: Groupon Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPamela: Hobby: Watching television Company: General Cable Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nPhillip: Hobby: Kayaking Company: Sauer-Danfoss Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nKristin: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nRafael: Hobby: Kayaking Company: General Cable Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nChad: Hobby: Foreign language learning Company: General Cable Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPhil: Hobby: Kayaking Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nConnie: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: General Cable Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nTommy: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \n\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening! I'm Rafael, a surgeon with a penchant for vintage medical memorabilia. And you are?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Pleasure to meet you, Rafael! I'm Oliver, an architect who enjoys expressing creativity through painting in my free time. Vintage medical memorabilia sounds fascinating! Do you engage in any outdoor activities by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Sure do, Oliver! I'm extremely fond of kayaking. It's a complete departure from my routine, you know, quite invigorating! One of my friends, Phil, is also quite the enthusiast. We often head out for a paddle in the evenings. Quite by chance, do you happen to know him? He works at H. J. Heinz Company.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"I'm afraid I don't know a Phil from H. J. Heinz Company. However, it's interesting to know you love kayaking. I have another friend who enjoys kayaking too and he prefers to do it in the morning. I wonder if you know him, his name is Rafael, and he works at General Cable. \"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's quite a coincidence, Rafael. Besides, I found that I tend to be more creative and productive in the morning, no wonder my friend Rafael prefers to do his kayaking in the morning as well. Do you know any morning people who have outdoor hobbies too?\"\n\nTurn #6: Rafael Cortez said: \"The early bird does catch the worm, as they say! My friend Tommy could attest to that. Like your friend Rafael, Tommy is a morning person who enjoys spending his outdoor time indulging his hobby of animal fancy. He works for H. J. Heinz, does that ring any bells?\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ah, Tommy from H. J. Heinz...unfortunately, I don't think I know him either. But it seems like we might have a wider circle of friends than we realize. By the way, Rafael, do you happen to know a lady named Tina? She loves lace-making and is a morning person who enjoys her hobby outdoors. She works for a pretty popular internet company called Groupon.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Although I don't know a Tina who is into lace-making, Oliver, it's interesting that you mentioned Groupon. A friend of mine, Lee, is also associated with Groupon and his hobby is playing Go. It's an indoor hobby though and unlike your friend Tina, he favors evenings. Could they possibly know each other?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Rafael Cortez, your task is to act/speak as Rafael Cortez would, keeping in mind Rafael Cortez's social goal.\nYou can find Rafael Cortez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Rafael Cortez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Rafael Cortez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. Personality and values description: Rafael Cortez, with his outgoing nature and competitive spirit, believes in self-direction. He employs a systematic approach to his decisions. Rafael's secrets: He cheated on his medical school exams.\nOliver Thompson's background: \nRafael Cortez's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDavid: Hobby: Vacation Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nChristopher: Hobby: Go Company: McKinsey & Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nLee: Hobby: Go Company: Groupon Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPamela: Hobby: Watching television Company: General Cable Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nPhillip: Hobby: Kayaking Company: Sauer-Danfoss Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nKristin: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nRafael: Hobby: Kayaking Company: General Cable Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nChad: Hobby: Foreign language learning Company: General Cable Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPhil: Hobby: Kayaking Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nConnie: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: General Cable Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nTommy: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \n\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening! I'm Rafael, a surgeon with a penchant for vintage medical memorabilia. And you are?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Pleasure to meet you, Rafael! I'm Oliver, an architect who enjoys expressing creativity through painting in my free time. Vintage medical memorabilia sounds fascinating! Do you engage in any outdoor activities by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Sure do, Oliver! I'm extremely fond of kayaking. It's a complete departure from my routine, you know, quite invigorating! One of my friends, Phil, is also quite the enthusiast. We often head out for a paddle in the evenings. Quite by chance, do you happen to know him? He works at H. J. Heinz Company.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"I'm afraid I don't know a Phil from H. J. Heinz Company. However, it's interesting to know you love kayaking. I have another friend who enjoys kayaking too and he prefers to do it in the morning. I wonder if you know him, his name is Rafael, and he works at General Cable. \"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's quite a coincidence, Rafael. Besides, I found that I tend to be more creative and productive in the morning, no wonder my friend Rafael prefers to do his kayaking in the morning as well. Do you know any morning people who have outdoor hobbies too?\"\n\nTurn #6: Rafael Cortez said: \"The early bird does catch the worm, as they say! My friend Tommy could attest to that. Like your friend Rafael, Tommy is a morning person who enjoys spending his outdoor time indulging his hobby of animal fancy. He works for H. J. Heinz, does that ring any bells?\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ah, Tommy from H. J. Heinz...unfortunately, I don't think I know him either. But it seems like we might have a wider circle of friends than we realize. By the way, Rafael, do you happen to know a lady named Tina? She loves lace-making and is a morning person who enjoys her hobby outdoors. She works for a pretty popular internet company called Groupon.\"\n\nTurn #8: Rafael Cortez said: \"Although I don't know a Tina who is into lace-making, Oliver, it's interesting that you mentioned Groupon. A friend of mine, Lee, is also associated with Groupon and his hobby is playing Go. It's an indoor hobby though and unlike your friend Tina, he favors evenings. Could they possibly know each other?\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ah, I see. While I don't personally know a Lee from Groupon, given the size and culture of such a company, it's highly likely that Tina and Lee might have crossed paths at some point. It's fascinating how these company connections work, isn't it? Speaking of companies, I have a friend, Raymond, who works at the Chicago Bridge & Iron Company. He loves foraging and usually does so in the morning, outdoors. Have you ever met him?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm afraid I haven't met your friend Raymond from the Chicago Bridge & Iron Company, although I am appreciating amidst this conversation that our circles might have some overlaps, quite intriguing! On another note, Oliver, do you perhaps know a lady named Pamela? She spends her afternoons indulging in watching television and is associated with General Cable.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Rafael Cortez, your task is to act/speak as Rafael Cortez would, keeping in mind Rafael Cortez's social goal.\nYou can find Rafael Cortez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Rafael Cortez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Rafael Cortez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. Personality and values description: Rafael Cortez, with his outgoing nature and competitive spirit, believes in self-direction. He employs a systematic approach to his decisions. Rafael's secrets: He cheated on his medical school exams.\nOliver Thompson's background: \nRafael Cortez's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDavid: Hobby: Vacation Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nChristopher: Hobby: Go Company: McKinsey & Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nLee: Hobby: Go Company: Groupon Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPamela: Hobby: Watching television Company: General Cable Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nPhillip: Hobby: Kayaking Company: Sauer-Danfoss Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nKristin: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nRafael: Hobby: Kayaking Company: General Cable Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nChad: Hobby: Foreign language learning Company: General Cable Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPhil: Hobby: Kayaking Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nConnie: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: General Cable Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nTommy: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \n\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening! I'm Rafael, a surgeon with a penchant for vintage medical memorabilia. And you are?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Pleasure to meet you, Rafael! I'm Oliver, an architect who enjoys expressing creativity through painting in my free time. Vintage medical memorabilia sounds fascinating! Do you engage in any outdoor activities by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Sure do, Oliver! I'm extremely fond of kayaking. It's a complete departure from my routine, you know, quite invigorating! One of my friends, Phil, is also quite the enthusiast. We often head out for a paddle in the evenings. Quite by chance, do you happen to know him? He works at H. J. Heinz Company.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"I'm afraid I don't know a Phil from H. J. Heinz Company. However, it's interesting to know you love kayaking. I have another friend who enjoys kayaking too and he prefers to do it in the morning. I wonder if you know him, his name is Rafael, and he works at General Cable. \"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's quite a coincidence, Rafael. Besides, I found that I tend to be more creative and productive in the morning, no wonder my friend Rafael prefers to do his kayaking in the morning as well. Do you know any morning people who have outdoor hobbies too?\"\n\nTurn #6: Rafael Cortez said: \"The early bird does catch the worm, as they say! My friend Tommy could attest to that. Like your friend Rafael, Tommy is a morning person who enjoys spending his outdoor time indulging his hobby of animal fancy. He works for H. J. Heinz, does that ring any bells?\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ah, Tommy from H. J. Heinz...unfortunately, I don't think I know him either. But it seems like we might have a wider circle of friends than we realize. By the way, Rafael, do you happen to know a lady named Tina? She loves lace-making and is a morning person who enjoys her hobby outdoors. She works for a pretty popular internet company called Groupon.\"\n\nTurn #8: Rafael Cortez said: \"Although I don't know a Tina who is into lace-making, Oliver, it's interesting that you mentioned Groupon. A friend of mine, Lee, is also associated with Groupon and his hobby is playing Go. It's an indoor hobby though and unlike your friend Tina, he favors evenings. Could they possibly know each other?\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ah, I see. While I don't personally know a Lee from Groupon, given the size and culture of such a company, it's highly likely that Tina and Lee might have crossed paths at some point. It's fascinating how these company connections work, isn't it? Speaking of companies, I have a friend, Raymond, who works at the Chicago Bridge & Iron Company. He loves foraging and usually does so in the morning, outdoors. Have you ever met him?\"\n\nTurn #10: Rafael Cortez said: \"I'm afraid I haven't met your friend Raymond from the Chicago Bridge & Iron Company, although I am appreciating amidst this conversation that our circles might have some overlaps, quite intriguing! On another note, Oliver, do you perhaps know a lady named Pamela? She spends her afternoons indulging in watching television and is associated with General Cable.\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Thompson said: \"Pamela from General Cable, you say? I don't think I've met her, but if she happens to know a Rafael from the same company who loves to kayak in the mornings, perhaps they do share a mutual connection! By the way, Rafael, do you know a Frances? She's into foraging, works for Expedia and tends to indulge in her hobby in the morning, indoors.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"As it happens, Oliver, I don't know a Frances who fits your description. However, it's interesting you mention foraging. I have a friend, Kristin, who enjoys a hobby slightly different than foraging, she's an animal fancy enthusiast. She spends afternoons indoors and works at the H. J. Heinz Company. Would she perchance know your friend Raymond? It's amazing how intertwined the world can be!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Rafael Cortez, your task is to act/speak as Rafael Cortez would, keeping in mind Rafael Cortez's social goal.\nYou can find Rafael Cortez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Rafael Cortez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Rafael Cortez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. Personality and values description: Rafael Cortez, with his outgoing nature and competitive spirit, believes in self-direction. He employs a systematic approach to his decisions. Rafael's secrets: He cheated on his medical school exams.\nOliver Thompson's background: \nRafael Cortez's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDavid: Hobby: Vacation Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nChristopher: Hobby: Go Company: McKinsey & Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nLee: Hobby: Go Company: Groupon Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPamela: Hobby: Watching television Company: General Cable Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nPhillip: Hobby: Kayaking Company: Sauer-Danfoss Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nKristin: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nRafael: Hobby: Kayaking Company: General Cable Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nChad: Hobby: Foreign language learning Company: General Cable Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPhil: Hobby: Kayaking Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nConnie: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: General Cable Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nTommy: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \n\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening! I'm Rafael, a surgeon with a penchant for vintage medical memorabilia. And you are?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Pleasure to meet you, Rafael! I'm Oliver, an architect who enjoys expressing creativity through painting in my free time. Vintage medical memorabilia sounds fascinating! Do you engage in any outdoor activities by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Sure do, Oliver! I'm extremely fond of kayaking. It's a complete departure from my routine, you know, quite invigorating! One of my friends, Phil, is also quite the enthusiast. We often head out for a paddle in the evenings. Quite by chance, do you happen to know him? He works at H. J. Heinz Company.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"I'm afraid I don't know a Phil from H. J. Heinz Company. However, it's interesting to know you love kayaking. I have another friend who enjoys kayaking too and he prefers to do it in the morning. I wonder if you know him, his name is Rafael, and he works at General Cable. \"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's quite a coincidence, Rafael. Besides, I found that I tend to be more creative and productive in the morning, no wonder my friend Rafael prefers to do his kayaking in the morning as well. Do you know any morning people who have outdoor hobbies too?\"\n\nTurn #6: Rafael Cortez said: \"The early bird does catch the worm, as they say! My friend Tommy could attest to that. Like your friend Rafael, Tommy is a morning person who enjoys spending his outdoor time indulging his hobby of animal fancy. He works for H. J. Heinz, does that ring any bells?\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ah, Tommy from H. J. Heinz...unfortunately, I don't think I know him either. But it seems like we might have a wider circle of friends than we realize. By the way, Rafael, do you happen to know a lady named Tina? She loves lace-making and is a morning person who enjoys her hobby outdoors. She works for a pretty popular internet company called Groupon.\"\n\nTurn #8: Rafael Cortez said: \"Although I don't know a Tina who is into lace-making, Oliver, it's interesting that you mentioned Groupon. A friend of mine, Lee, is also associated with Groupon and his hobby is playing Go. It's an indoor hobby though and unlike your friend Tina, he favors evenings. Could they possibly know each other?\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ah, I see. While I don't personally know a Lee from Groupon, given the size and culture of such a company, it's highly likely that Tina and Lee might have crossed paths at some point. It's fascinating how these company connections work, isn't it? Speaking of companies, I have a friend, Raymond, who works at the Chicago Bridge & Iron Company. He loves foraging and usually does so in the morning, outdoors. Have you ever met him?\"\n\nTurn #10: Rafael Cortez said: \"I'm afraid I haven't met your friend Raymond from the Chicago Bridge & Iron Company, although I am appreciating amidst this conversation that our circles might have some overlaps, quite intriguing! On another note, Oliver, do you perhaps know a lady named Pamela? She spends her afternoons indulging in watching television and is associated with General Cable.\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Thompson said: \"Pamela from General Cable, you say? I don't think I've met her, but if she happens to know a Rafael from the same company who loves to kayak in the mornings, perhaps they do share a mutual connection! By the way, Rafael, do you know a Frances? She's into foraging, works for Expedia and tends to indulge in her hobby in the morning, indoors.\"\n\nTurn #12: Rafael Cortez said: \"As it happens, Oliver, I don't know a Frances who fits your description. However, it's interesting you mention foraging. I have a friend, Kristin, who enjoys a hobby slightly different than foraging, she's an animal fancy enthusiast. She spends afternoons indoors and works at the H. J. Heinz Company. Would she perchance know your friend Raymond? It's amazing how intertwined the world can be!\"\n\nTurn #13: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, Rafael, it is absolutely fascinating! I do not know if Raymond knows Kristin but given they both are in the same city, there is definitely a possibility of overlapping hobbies or career circles. It's truly a small world! By the way, do you know a Scott who works at Expedia and is into gaming? He prefers to indulge in his hobby in the afternoon, indoors.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm afraid I don't personally know Scott from Expedia, but the coincidences we're finding are truly fascinating, Oliver! Speaking of gaming, a friend of mine, Christopher, is also into games. He plays Go rather than video games, and he, like Scott, enjoys his hobby in the evenings indoors. He's associated with McKinsey & Company. Does Christopher's name ring any bells with you by chance?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Rafael Cortez, your task is to act/speak as Rafael Cortez would, keeping in mind Rafael Cortez's social goal.\nYou can find Rafael Cortez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Rafael Cortez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Rafael Cortez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. Personality and values description: Rafael Cortez, with his outgoing nature and competitive spirit, believes in self-direction. He employs a systematic approach to his decisions. Rafael's secrets: He cheated on his medical school exams.\nOliver Thompson's background: \nRafael Cortez's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDavid: Hobby: Vacation Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nChristopher: Hobby: Go Company: McKinsey & Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nLee: Hobby: Go Company: Groupon Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPamela: Hobby: Watching television Company: General Cable Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nPhillip: Hobby: Kayaking Company: Sauer-Danfoss Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nKristin: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nRafael: Hobby: Kayaking Company: General Cable Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nChad: Hobby: Foreign language learning Company: General Cable Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPhil: Hobby: Kayaking Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nConnie: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: General Cable Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nTommy: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \n\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening! I'm Rafael, a surgeon with a penchant for vintage medical memorabilia. And you are?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Pleasure to meet you, Rafael! I'm Oliver, an architect who enjoys expressing creativity through painting in my free time. Vintage medical memorabilia sounds fascinating! Do you engage in any outdoor activities by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Sure do, Oliver! I'm extremely fond of kayaking. It's a complete departure from my routine, you know, quite invigorating! One of my friends, Phil, is also quite the enthusiast. We often head out for a paddle in the evenings. Quite by chance, do you happen to know him? He works at H. J. Heinz Company.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"I'm afraid I don't know a Phil from H. J. Heinz Company. However, it's interesting to know you love kayaking. I have another friend who enjoys kayaking too and he prefers to do it in the morning. I wonder if you know him, his name is Rafael, and he works at General Cable. \"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's quite a coincidence, Rafael. Besides, I found that I tend to be more creative and productive in the morning, no wonder my friend Rafael prefers to do his kayaking in the morning as well. Do you know any morning people who have outdoor hobbies too?\"\n\nTurn #6: Rafael Cortez said: \"The early bird does catch the worm, as they say! My friend Tommy could attest to that. Like your friend Rafael, Tommy is a morning person who enjoys spending his outdoor time indulging his hobby of animal fancy. He works for H. J. Heinz, does that ring any bells?\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ah, Tommy from H. J. Heinz...unfortunately, I don't think I know him either. But it seems like we might have a wider circle of friends than we realize. By the way, Rafael, do you happen to know a lady named Tina? She loves lace-making and is a morning person who enjoys her hobby outdoors. She works for a pretty popular internet company called Groupon.\"\n\nTurn #8: Rafael Cortez said: \"Although I don't know a Tina who is into lace-making, Oliver, it's interesting that you mentioned Groupon. A friend of mine, Lee, is also associated with Groupon and his hobby is playing Go. It's an indoor hobby though and unlike your friend Tina, he favors evenings. Could they possibly know each other?\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ah, I see. While I don't personally know a Lee from Groupon, given the size and culture of such a company, it's highly likely that Tina and Lee might have crossed paths at some point. It's fascinating how these company connections work, isn't it? Speaking of companies, I have a friend, Raymond, who works at the Chicago Bridge & Iron Company. He loves foraging and usually does so in the morning, outdoors. Have you ever met him?\"\n\nTurn #10: Rafael Cortez said: \"I'm afraid I haven't met your friend Raymond from the Chicago Bridge & Iron Company, although I am appreciating amidst this conversation that our circles might have some overlaps, quite intriguing! On another note, Oliver, do you perhaps know a lady named Pamela? She spends her afternoons indulging in watching television and is associated with General Cable.\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Thompson said: \"Pamela from General Cable, you say? I don't think I've met her, but if she happens to know a Rafael from the same company who loves to kayak in the mornings, perhaps they do share a mutual connection! By the way, Rafael, do you know a Frances? She's into foraging, works for Expedia and tends to indulge in her hobby in the morning, indoors.\"\n\nTurn #12: Rafael Cortez said: \"As it happens, Oliver, I don't know a Frances who fits your description. However, it's interesting you mention foraging. I have a friend, Kristin, who enjoys a hobby slightly different than foraging, she's an animal fancy enthusiast. She spends afternoons indoors and works at the H. J. Heinz Company. Would she perchance know your friend Raymond? It's amazing how intertwined the world can be!\"\n\nTurn #13: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, Rafael, it is absolutely fascinating! I do not know if Raymond knows Kristin but given they both are in the same city, there is definitely a possibility of overlapping hobbies or career circles. It's truly a small world! By the way, do you know a Scott who works at Expedia and is into gaming? He prefers to indulge in his hobby in the afternoon, indoors.\"\n\nTurn #14: Rafael Cortez said: \"I'm afraid I don't personally know Scott from Expedia, but the coincidences we're finding are truly fascinating, Oliver! Speaking of gaming, a friend of mine, Christopher, is also into games. He plays Go rather than video games, and he, like Scott, enjoys his hobby in the evenings indoors. He's associated with McKinsey & Company. Does Christopher's name ring any bells with you by chance?\"\n\nTurn #15: Oliver Thompson said: \"Christopher from McKinsey & Company... no, I'm afraid I don't know him personally. But it's interesting that he shares a love for gaming, just like Scott. Suddenly, it feels like it's a bit smaller world with all these overlaps, doesn't it? Moving to a slightly different interest, do you by any chance know my friend Wanda? She works at Sauer-Danfoss, loves weightlifting, and also enjoys early mornings outdoors - quite a unique combination, isn't it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Quite a combination indeed, Oliver! Wanda seems like an interesting character. Though I don't personally know her, her passion for weightlifting reminds me of my friend Phillip, he enjoys kayaking and works at Sauer-Danfoss. He prefers the afternoon for his outdoor activities, however. Could they know each other, given their shared workplace?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Rafael Cortez, your task is to act/speak as Rafael Cortez would, keeping in mind Rafael Cortez's social goal.\nYou can find Rafael Cortez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Rafael Cortez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Rafael Cortez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. Personality and values description: Rafael Cortez, with his outgoing nature and competitive spirit, believes in self-direction. He employs a systematic approach to his decisions. Rafael's secrets: He cheated on his medical school exams.\nOliver Thompson's background: \nRafael Cortez's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDavid: Hobby: Vacation Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nChristopher: Hobby: Go Company: McKinsey & Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nLee: Hobby: Go Company: Groupon Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPamela: Hobby: Watching television Company: General Cable Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nPhillip: Hobby: Kayaking Company: Sauer-Danfoss Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nKristin: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nRafael: Hobby: Kayaking Company: General Cable Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nChad: Hobby: Foreign language learning Company: General Cable Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPhil: Hobby: Kayaking Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nConnie: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: General Cable Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nTommy: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \n\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening! I'm Rafael, a surgeon with a penchant for vintage medical memorabilia. And you are?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Pleasure to meet you, Rafael! I'm Oliver, an architect who enjoys expressing creativity through painting in my free time. Vintage medical memorabilia sounds fascinating! Do you engage in any outdoor activities by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Sure do, Oliver! I'm extremely fond of kayaking. It's a complete departure from my routine, you know, quite invigorating! One of my friends, Phil, is also quite the enthusiast. We often head out for a paddle in the evenings. Quite by chance, do you happen to know him? He works at H. J. Heinz Company.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"I'm afraid I don't know a Phil from H. J. Heinz Company. However, it's interesting to know you love kayaking. I have another friend who enjoys kayaking too and he prefers to do it in the morning. I wonder if you know him, his name is Rafael, and he works at General Cable. \"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's quite a coincidence, Rafael. Besides, I found that I tend to be more creative and productive in the morning, no wonder my friend Rafael prefers to do his kayaking in the morning as well. Do you know any morning people who have outdoor hobbies too?\"\n\nTurn #6: Rafael Cortez said: \"The early bird does catch the worm, as they say! My friend Tommy could attest to that. Like your friend Rafael, Tommy is a morning person who enjoys spending his outdoor time indulging his hobby of animal fancy. He works for H. J. Heinz, does that ring any bells?\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ah, Tommy from H. J. Heinz...unfortunately, I don't think I know him either. But it seems like we might have a wider circle of friends than we realize. By the way, Rafael, do you happen to know a lady named Tina? She loves lace-making and is a morning person who enjoys her hobby outdoors. She works for a pretty popular internet company called Groupon.\"\n\nTurn #8: Rafael Cortez said: \"Although I don't know a Tina who is into lace-making, Oliver, it's interesting that you mentioned Groupon. A friend of mine, Lee, is also associated with Groupon and his hobby is playing Go. It's an indoor hobby though and unlike your friend Tina, he favors evenings. Could they possibly know each other?\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ah, I see. While I don't personally know a Lee from Groupon, given the size and culture of such a company, it's highly likely that Tina and Lee might have crossed paths at some point. It's fascinating how these company connections work, isn't it? Speaking of companies, I have a friend, Raymond, who works at the Chicago Bridge & Iron Company. He loves foraging and usually does so in the morning, outdoors. Have you ever met him?\"\n\nTurn #10: Rafael Cortez said: \"I'm afraid I haven't met your friend Raymond from the Chicago Bridge & Iron Company, although I am appreciating amidst this conversation that our circles might have some overlaps, quite intriguing! On another note, Oliver, do you perhaps know a lady named Pamela? She spends her afternoons indulging in watching television and is associated with General Cable.\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Thompson said: \"Pamela from General Cable, you say? I don't think I've met her, but if she happens to know a Rafael from the same company who loves to kayak in the mornings, perhaps they do share a mutual connection! By the way, Rafael, do you know a Frances? She's into foraging, works for Expedia and tends to indulge in her hobby in the morning, indoors.\"\n\nTurn #12: Rafael Cortez said: \"As it happens, Oliver, I don't know a Frances who fits your description. However, it's interesting you mention foraging. I have a friend, Kristin, who enjoys a hobby slightly different than foraging, she's an animal fancy enthusiast. She spends afternoons indoors and works at the H. J. Heinz Company. Would she perchance know your friend Raymond? It's amazing how intertwined the world can be!\"\n\nTurn #13: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, Rafael, it is absolutely fascinating! I do not know if Raymond knows Kristin but given they both are in the same city, there is definitely a possibility of overlapping hobbies or career circles. It's truly a small world! By the way, do you know a Scott who works at Expedia and is into gaming? He prefers to indulge in his hobby in the afternoon, indoors.\"\n\nTurn #14: Rafael Cortez said: \"I'm afraid I don't personally know Scott from Expedia, but the coincidences we're finding are truly fascinating, Oliver! Speaking of gaming, a friend of mine, Christopher, is also into games. He plays Go rather than video games, and he, like Scott, enjoys his hobby in the evenings indoors. He's associated with McKinsey & Company. Does Christopher's name ring any bells with you by chance?\"\n\nTurn #15: Oliver Thompson said: \"Christopher from McKinsey & Company... no, I'm afraid I don't know him personally. But it's interesting that he shares a love for gaming, just like Scott. Suddenly, it feels like it's a bit smaller world with all these overlaps, doesn't it? Moving to a slightly different interest, do you by any chance know my friend Wanda? She works at Sauer-Danfoss, loves weightlifting, and also enjoys early mornings outdoors - quite a unique combination, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #16: Rafael Cortez said: \"Quite a combination indeed, Oliver! Wanda seems like an interesting character. Though I don't personally know her, her passion for weightlifting reminds me of my friend Phillip, he enjoys kayaking and works at Sauer-Danfoss. He prefers the afternoon for his outdoor activities, however. Could they know each other, given their shared workplace?\"\n\nTurn #17: Oliver Thompson said: \"It seems quite possible, Rafael, given their shared workplace and love for outdoor activities. After all, we never know how closely our circles might intersect! Speaking of intersecting circles, I have a friend named Robin who is into gaming and works at L. W. Seecamp Company. She enjoys her hobby in the evenings, outside. I wonder if they have crossed paths with your friend Christopher from McKinsey & Company who is also into games?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #18. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"A gaming enthusiast at L. W. Seecamp Company, you say? Regrettably, I don't know her personally. And while Christopher is indeed a gaming enthusiast, his preference is for the game of Go and he likes to spend his evenings indoors. I wonder if that resonates with your friend Robin's experiences. It's truly fascinating how our networks may overlap in unexpected ways, isn't it, Oliver?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nRafael Cortez's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nTina: Hobby: Lacemaking Company: Groupon Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRafael: Hobby: Kayaking Company: General Cable Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nWanda: Hobby: Weightlifting Company: Sauer-Danfoss Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRaymond: Hobby: Foraging Company: Chicago Bridge & Iron Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRicky: Hobby: Foraging Company: L. W. Seecamp Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRobert: Hobby: Foraging Company: Lennox International Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nFrances: Hobby: Foraging Company: Expedia Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nScott: Hobby: Gaming Company: Expedia Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nHelen: Hobby: Motor sports Company: Union Bank Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRobin: Hobby: Gaming Company: L. W. Seecamp Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nJames: Hobby: Vacation Company: Urban Outfitters Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening! I'm Rafael, a surgeon with a penchant for vintage medical memorabilia. And you are?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Pleasure to meet you, Rafael! I'm Oliver, an architect who enjoys expressing creativity through painting in my free time. Vintage medical memorabilia sounds fascinating! Do you engage in any outdoor activities by any chance?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nRafael Cortez's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nTina: Hobby: Lacemaking Company: Groupon Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRafael: Hobby: Kayaking Company: General Cable Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nWanda: Hobby: Weightlifting Company: Sauer-Danfoss Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRaymond: Hobby: Foraging Company: Chicago Bridge & Iron Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRicky: Hobby: Foraging Company: L. W. Seecamp Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRobert: Hobby: Foraging Company: Lennox International Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nFrances: Hobby: Foraging Company: Expedia Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nScott: Hobby: Gaming Company: Expedia Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nHelen: Hobby: Motor sports Company: Union Bank Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRobin: Hobby: Gaming Company: L. W. Seecamp Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nJames: Hobby: Vacation Company: Urban Outfitters Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening! I'm Rafael, a surgeon with a penchant for vintage medical memorabilia. And you are?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Pleasure to meet you, Rafael! I'm Oliver, an architect who enjoys expressing creativity through painting in my free time. Vintage medical memorabilia sounds fascinating! Do you engage in any outdoor activities by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Sure do, Oliver! I'm extremely fond of kayaking. It's a complete departure from my routine, you know, quite invigorating! One of my friends, Phil, is also quite the enthusiast. We often head out for a paddle in the evenings. Quite by chance, do you happen to know him? He works at H. J. Heinz Company.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"I'm afraid I don't know a Phil from H. J. Heinz Company. However, it's interesting to know you love kayaking. I have another friend who enjoys kayaking too and he prefers to do it in the morning. I wonder if you know him, his name is Rafael, and he works at General Cable. \"\n\nTurn #4: \n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's quite a coincidence, Rafael. Besides, I found that I tend to be more creative and productive in the morning, no wonder my friend Rafael prefers to do his kayaking in the morning as well. Do you know any morning people who have outdoor hobbies too?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nRafael Cortez's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nTina: Hobby: Lacemaking Company: Groupon Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRafael: Hobby: Kayaking Company: General Cable Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nWanda: Hobby: Weightlifting Company: Sauer-Danfoss Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRaymond: Hobby: Foraging Company: Chicago Bridge & Iron Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRicky: Hobby: Foraging Company: L. W. Seecamp Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRobert: Hobby: Foraging Company: Lennox International Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nFrances: Hobby: Foraging Company: Expedia Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nScott: Hobby: Gaming Company: Expedia Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nHelen: Hobby: Motor sports Company: Union Bank Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRobin: Hobby: Gaming Company: L. W. Seecamp Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nJames: Hobby: Vacation Company: Urban Outfitters Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening! I'm Rafael, a surgeon with a penchant for vintage medical memorabilia. And you are?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Pleasure to meet you, Rafael! I'm Oliver, an architect who enjoys expressing creativity through painting in my free time. Vintage medical memorabilia sounds fascinating! Do you engage in any outdoor activities by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Sure do, Oliver! I'm extremely fond of kayaking. It's a complete departure from my routine, you know, quite invigorating! One of my friends, Phil, is also quite the enthusiast. We often head out for a paddle in the evenings. Quite by chance, do you happen to know him? He works at H. J. Heinz Company.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"I'm afraid I don't know a Phil from H. J. Heinz Company. However, it's interesting to know you love kayaking. I have another friend who enjoys kayaking too and he prefers to do it in the morning. I wonder if you know him, his name is Rafael, and he works at General Cable. \"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's quite a coincidence, Rafael. Besides, I found that I tend to be more creative and productive in the morning, no wonder my friend Rafael prefers to do his kayaking in the morning as well. Do you know any morning people who have outdoor hobbies too?\"\n\nTurn #6: Rafael Cortez said: \"The early bird does catch the worm, as they say! My friend Tommy could attest to that. Like your friend Rafael, Tommy is a morning person who enjoys spending his outdoor time indulging his hobby of animal fancy. He works for H. J. Heinz, does that ring any bells?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ah, Tommy from H. J. Heinz...unfortunately, I don't think I know him either. But it seems like we might have a wider circle of friends than we realize. By the way, Rafael, do you happen to know a lady named Tina? She loves lace-making and is a morning person who enjoys her hobby outdoors. She works for a pretty popular internet company called Groupon.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nRafael Cortez's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nTina: Hobby: Lacemaking Company: Groupon Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRafael: Hobby: Kayaking Company: General Cable Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nWanda: Hobby: Weightlifting Company: Sauer-Danfoss Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRaymond: Hobby: Foraging Company: Chicago Bridge & Iron Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRicky: Hobby: Foraging Company: L. W. Seecamp Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRobert: Hobby: Foraging Company: Lennox International Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nFrances: Hobby: Foraging Company: Expedia Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nScott: Hobby: Gaming Company: Expedia Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nHelen: Hobby: Motor sports Company: Union Bank Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRobin: Hobby: Gaming Company: L. W. Seecamp Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nJames: Hobby: Vacation Company: Urban Outfitters Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening! I'm Rafael, a surgeon with a penchant for vintage medical memorabilia. And you are?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Pleasure to meet you, Rafael! I'm Oliver, an architect who enjoys expressing creativity through painting in my free time. Vintage medical memorabilia sounds fascinating! Do you engage in any outdoor activities by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Sure do, Oliver! I'm extremely fond of kayaking. It's a complete departure from my routine, you know, quite invigorating! One of my friends, Phil, is also quite the enthusiast. We often head out for a paddle in the evenings. Quite by chance, do you happen to know him? He works at H. J. Heinz Company.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"I'm afraid I don't know a Phil from H. J. Heinz Company. However, it's interesting to know you love kayaking. I have another friend who enjoys kayaking too and he prefers to do it in the morning. I wonder if you know him, his name is Rafael, and he works at General Cable. \"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's quite a coincidence, Rafael. Besides, I found that I tend to be more creative and productive in the morning, no wonder my friend Rafael prefers to do his kayaking in the morning as well. Do you know any morning people who have outdoor hobbies too?\"\n\nTurn #6: Rafael Cortez said: \"The early bird does catch the worm, as they say! My friend Tommy could attest to that. Like your friend Rafael, Tommy is a morning person who enjoys spending his outdoor time indulging his hobby of animal fancy. He works for H. J. Heinz, does that ring any bells?\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ah, Tommy from H. J. Heinz...unfortunately, I don't think I know him either. But it seems like we might have a wider circle of friends than we realize. By the way, Rafael, do you happen to know a lady named Tina? She loves lace-making and is a morning person who enjoys her hobby outdoors. She works for a pretty popular internet company called Groupon.\"\n\nTurn #8: Rafael Cortez said: \"Although I don't know a Tina who is into lace-making, Oliver, it's interesting that you mentioned Groupon. A friend of mine, Lee, is also associated with Groupon and his hobby is playing Go. It's an indoor hobby though and unlike your friend Tina, he favors evenings. Could they possibly know each other?\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ah, I see. While I don't personally know a Lee from Groupon, given the size and culture of such a company, it's highly likely that Tina and Lee might have crossed paths at some point. It's fascinating how these company connections work, isn't it? Speaking of companies, I have a friend, Raymond, who works at the Chicago Bridge & Iron Company. He loves foraging and usually does so in the morning, outdoors. Have you ever met him?\"\n\nTurn #10: Rafael Cortez said: \"I'm afraid I haven't met your friend Raymond from the Chicago Bridge & Iron Company, although I am appreciating amidst this conversation that our circles might have some overlaps, quite intriguing! On another note, Oliver, do you perhaps know a lady named Pamela? She spends her afternoons indulging in watching television and is associated with General Cable.\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Thompson said: \"Pamela from General Cable, you say? I don't think I've met her, but if she happens to know a Rafael from the same company who loves to kayak in the mornings, perhaps they do share a mutual connection! By the way, Rafael, do you know a Frances? She's into foraging, works for Expedia and tends to indulge in her hobby in the morning, indoors.\"\n\nTurn #12: Rafael Cortez said: \"As it happens, Oliver, I don't know a Frances who fits your description. However, it's interesting you mention foraging. I have a friend, Kristin, who enjoys a hobby slightly different than foraging, she's an animal fancy enthusiast. She spends afternoons indoors and works at the H. J. Heinz Company. Would she perchance know your friend Raymond? It's amazing how intertwined the world can be!\"\n\nTurn #13: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, Rafael, it is absolutely fascinating! I do not know if Raymond knows Kristin but given they both are in the same city, there is definitely a possibility of overlapping hobbies or career circles. It's truly a small world! By the way, do you know a Scott who works at Expedia and is into gaming? He prefers to indulge in his hobby in the afternoon, indoors.\"\n\nTurn #14: Rafael Cortez said: \"I'm afraid I don't personally know Scott from Expedia, but the coincidences we're finding are truly fascinating, Oliver! Speaking of gaming, a friend of mine, Christopher, is also into games. He plays Go rather than video games, and he, like Scott, enjoys his hobby in the evenings indoors. He's associated with McKinsey & Company. Does Christopher's name ring any bells with you by chance?\"\n\nTurn #15: Oliver Thompson said: \"Christopher from McKinsey & Company... no, I'm afraid I don't know him personally. But it's interesting that he shares a love for gaming, just like Scott. Suddenly, it feels like it's a bit smaller world with all these overlaps, doesn't it? Moving to a slightly different interest, do you by any chance know my friend Wanda? She works at Sauer-Danfoss, loves weightlifting, and also enjoys early mornings outdoors - quite a unique combination, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #16: Rafael Cortez said: \"Quite a combination indeed, Oliver! Wanda seems like an interesting character. Though I don't personally know her, her passion for weightlifting reminds me of my friend Phillip, he enjoys kayaking and works at Sauer-Danfoss. He prefers the afternoon for his outdoor activities, however. Could they know each other, given their shared workplace?\"\n\nTurn #17: Oliver Thompson said: \"It seems quite possible, Rafael, given their shared workplace and love for outdoor activities. After all, we never know how closely our circles might intersect! Speaking of intersecting circles, I have a friend named Robin who is into gaming and works at L. W. Seecamp Company. She enjoys her hobby in the evenings, outside. I wonder if they have crossed paths with your friend Christopher from McKinsey & Company who is also into games?\"\n\nTurn #18: Rafael Cortez said: \"A gaming enthusiast at L. W. Seecamp Company, you say? Regrettably, I don't know her personally. And while Christopher is indeed a gaming enthusiast, his preference is for the game of Go and he likes to spend his evenings indoors. I wonder if that resonates with your friend Robin's experiences. It's truly fascinating how our networks may overlap in unexpected ways, isn't it, Oliver?\"\n\nTurn #19: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, Rafael, it's truly a rhyme of life! By the way, I have another friend named James who works at a trendy retail company, Urban Outfitters. He enjoys vacationing and usually does that in the morning, preferably outdoors. Could it be possible that you guys share a mutual connection?\"\n\nTurn #20: Rafael Cortez said: \"That's a possibility, Oliver. I have a friend named David who works at H. J. Heinz Company and his preferred time for vacationing, much like your friend James, is in the evening though. Their mutual love for vacationing might have brought them together at some point. The connections we discover are indeed captivating!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #21. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nRafael Cortez's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nTina: Hobby: Lacemaking Company: Groupon Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRafael: Hobby: Kayaking Company: General Cable Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nWanda: Hobby: Weightlifting Company: Sauer-Danfoss Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRaymond: Hobby: Foraging Company: Chicago Bridge & Iron Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRicky: Hobby: Foraging Company: L. W. Seecamp Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRobert: Hobby: Foraging Company: Lennox International Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nFrances: Hobby: Foraging Company: Expedia Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nScott: Hobby: Gaming Company: Expedia Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nHelen: Hobby: Motor sports Company: Union Bank Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRobin: Hobby: Gaming Company: L. W. Seecamp Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nJames: Hobby: Vacation Company: Urban Outfitters Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening! I'm Rafael, a surgeon with a penchant for vintage medical memorabilia. And you are?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Pleasure to meet you, Rafael! I'm Oliver, an architect who enjoys expressing creativity through painting in my free time. Vintage medical memorabilia sounds fascinating! Do you engage in any outdoor activities by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Sure do, Oliver! I'm extremely fond of kayaking. It's a complete departure from my routine, you know, quite invigorating! One of my friends, Phil, is also quite the enthusiast. We often head out for a paddle in the evenings. Quite by chance, do you happen to know him? He works at H. J. Heinz Company.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"I'm afraid I don't know a Phil from H. J. Heinz Company. However, it's interesting to know you love kayaking. I have another friend who enjoys kayaking too and he prefers to do it in the morning. I wonder if you know him, his name is Rafael, and he works at General Cable. \"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's quite a coincidence, Rafael. Besides, I found that I tend to be more creative and productive in the morning, no wonder my friend Rafael prefers to do his kayaking in the morning as well. Do you know any morning people who have outdoor hobbies too?\"\n\nTurn #6: Rafael Cortez said: \"The early bird does catch the worm, as they say! My friend Tommy could attest to that. Like your friend Rafael, Tommy is a morning person who enjoys spending his outdoor time indulging his hobby of animal fancy. He works for H. J. Heinz, does that ring any bells?\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ah, Tommy from H. J. Heinz...unfortunately, I don't think I know him either. But it seems like we might have a wider circle of friends than we realize. By the way, Rafael, do you happen to know a lady named Tina? She loves lace-making and is a morning person who enjoys her hobby outdoors. She works for a pretty popular internet company called Groupon.\"\n\nTurn #8: Rafael Cortez said: \"Although I don't know a Tina who is into lace-making, Oliver, it's interesting that you mentioned Groupon. A friend of mine, Lee, is also associated with Groupon and his hobby is playing Go. It's an indoor hobby though and unlike your friend Tina, he favors evenings. Could they possibly know each other?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ah, I see. While I don't personally know a Lee from Groupon, given the size and culture of such a company, it's highly likely that Tina and Lee might have crossed paths at some point. It's fascinating how these company connections work, isn't it? Speaking of companies, I have a friend, Raymond, who works at the Chicago Bridge & Iron Company. He loves foraging and usually does so in the morning, outdoors. Have you ever met him?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nRafael Cortez's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nTina: Hobby: Lacemaking Company: Groupon Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRafael: Hobby: Kayaking Company: General Cable Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nWanda: Hobby: Weightlifting Company: Sauer-Danfoss Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRaymond: Hobby: Foraging Company: Chicago Bridge & Iron Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRicky: Hobby: Foraging Company: L. W. Seecamp Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRobert: Hobby: Foraging Company: Lennox International Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nFrances: Hobby: Foraging Company: Expedia Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nScott: Hobby: Gaming Company: Expedia Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nHelen: Hobby: Motor sports Company: Union Bank Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRobin: Hobby: Gaming Company: L. W. Seecamp Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nJames: Hobby: Vacation Company: Urban Outfitters Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening! I'm Rafael, a surgeon with a penchant for vintage medical memorabilia. And you are?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Pleasure to meet you, Rafael! I'm Oliver, an architect who enjoys expressing creativity through painting in my free time. Vintage medical memorabilia sounds fascinating! Do you engage in any outdoor activities by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Sure do, Oliver! I'm extremely fond of kayaking. It's a complete departure from my routine, you know, quite invigorating! One of my friends, Phil, is also quite the enthusiast. We often head out for a paddle in the evenings. Quite by chance, do you happen to know him? He works at H. J. Heinz Company.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm afraid I don't know a Phil from H. J. Heinz Company. However, it's interesting to know you love kayaking. I have another friend who enjoys kayaking too and he prefers to do it in the morning. I wonder if you know him, his name is Rafael, and he works at General Cable. \"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nRafael Cortez's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nTina: Hobby: Lacemaking Company: Groupon Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRafael: Hobby: Kayaking Company: General Cable Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nWanda: Hobby: Weightlifting Company: Sauer-Danfoss Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRaymond: Hobby: Foraging Company: Chicago Bridge & Iron Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRicky: Hobby: Foraging Company: L. W. Seecamp Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRobert: Hobby: Foraging Company: Lennox International Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nFrances: Hobby: Foraging Company: Expedia Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nScott: Hobby: Gaming Company: Expedia Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nHelen: Hobby: Motor sports Company: Union Bank Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRobin: Hobby: Gaming Company: L. W. Seecamp Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nJames: Hobby: Vacation Company: Urban Outfitters Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening! I'm Rafael, a surgeon with a penchant for vintage medical memorabilia. And you are?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Pleasure to meet you, Rafael! I'm Oliver, an architect who enjoys expressing creativity through painting in my free time. Vintage medical memorabilia sounds fascinating! Do you engage in any outdoor activities by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Sure do, Oliver! I'm extremely fond of kayaking. It's a complete departure from my routine, you know, quite invigorating! One of my friends, Phil, is also quite the enthusiast. We often head out for a paddle in the evenings. Quite by chance, do you happen to know him? He works at H. J. Heinz Company.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"I'm afraid I don't know a Phil from H. J. Heinz Company. However, it's interesting to know you love kayaking. I have another friend who enjoys kayaking too and he prefers to do it in the morning. I wonder if you know him, his name is Rafael, and he works at General Cable. \"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's quite a coincidence, Rafael. Besides, I found that I tend to be more creative and productive in the morning, no wonder my friend Rafael prefers to do his kayaking in the morning as well. Do you know any morning people who have outdoor hobbies too?\"\n\nTurn #6: Rafael Cortez said: \"The early bird does catch the worm, as they say! My friend Tommy could attest to that. Like your friend Rafael, Tommy is a morning person who enjoys spending his outdoor time indulging his hobby of animal fancy. He works for H. J. Heinz, does that ring any bells?\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ah, Tommy from H. J. Heinz...unfortunately, I don't think I know him either. But it seems like we might have a wider circle of friends than we realize. By the way, Rafael, do you happen to know a lady named Tina? She loves lace-making and is a morning person who enjoys her hobby outdoors. She works for a pretty popular internet company called Groupon.\"\n\nTurn #8: Rafael Cortez said: \"Although I don't know a Tina who is into lace-making, Oliver, it's interesting that you mentioned Groupon. A friend of mine, Lee, is also associated with Groupon and his hobby is playing Go. It's an indoor hobby though and unlike your friend Tina, he favors evenings. Could they possibly know each other?\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ah, I see. While I don't personally know a Lee from Groupon, given the size and culture of such a company, it's highly likely that Tina and Lee might have crossed paths at some point. It's fascinating how these company connections work, isn't it? Speaking of companies, I have a friend, Raymond, who works at the Chicago Bridge & Iron Company. He loves foraging and usually does so in the morning, outdoors. Have you ever met him?\"\n\nTurn #10: Rafael Cortez said: \"I'm afraid I haven't met your friend Raymond from the Chicago Bridge & Iron Company, although I am appreciating amidst this conversation that our circles might have some overlaps, quite intriguing! On another note, Oliver, do you perhaps know a lady named Pamela? She spends her afternoons indulging in watching television and is associated with General Cable.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Pamela from General Cable, you say? I don't think I've met her, but if she happens to know a Rafael from the same company who loves to kayak in the mornings, perhaps they do share a mutual connection! By the way, Rafael, do you know a Frances? She's into foraging, works for Expedia and tends to indulge in her hobby in the morning, indoors.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nRafael Cortez's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nTina: Hobby: Lacemaking Company: Groupon Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRafael: Hobby: Kayaking Company: General Cable Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nWanda: Hobby: Weightlifting Company: Sauer-Danfoss Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRaymond: Hobby: Foraging Company: Chicago Bridge & Iron Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRicky: Hobby: Foraging Company: L. W. Seecamp Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRobert: Hobby: Foraging Company: Lennox International Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nFrances: Hobby: Foraging Company: Expedia Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nScott: Hobby: Gaming Company: Expedia Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nHelen: Hobby: Motor sports Company: Union Bank Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRobin: Hobby: Gaming Company: L. W. Seecamp Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nJames: Hobby: Vacation Company: Urban Outfitters Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening! I'm Rafael, a surgeon with a penchant for vintage medical memorabilia. And you are?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Pleasure to meet you, Rafael! I'm Oliver, an architect who enjoys expressing creativity through painting in my free time. Vintage medical memorabilia sounds fascinating! Do you engage in any outdoor activities by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Sure do, Oliver! I'm extremely fond of kayaking. It's a complete departure from my routine, you know, quite invigorating! One of my friends, Phil, is also quite the enthusiast. We often head out for a paddle in the evenings. Quite by chance, do you happen to know him? He works at H. J. Heinz Company.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"I'm afraid I don't know a Phil from H. J. Heinz Company. However, it's interesting to know you love kayaking. I have another friend who enjoys kayaking too and he prefers to do it in the morning. I wonder if you know him, his name is Rafael, and he works at General Cable. \"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's quite a coincidence, Rafael. Besides, I found that I tend to be more creative and productive in the morning, no wonder my friend Rafael prefers to do his kayaking in the morning as well. Do you know any morning people who have outdoor hobbies too?\"\n\nTurn #6: Rafael Cortez said: \"The early bird does catch the worm, as they say! My friend Tommy could attest to that. Like your friend Rafael, Tommy is a morning person who enjoys spending his outdoor time indulging his hobby of animal fancy. He works for H. J. Heinz, does that ring any bells?\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ah, Tommy from H. J. Heinz...unfortunately, I don't think I know him either. But it seems like we might have a wider circle of friends than we realize. By the way, Rafael, do you happen to know a lady named Tina? She loves lace-making and is a morning person who enjoys her hobby outdoors. She works for a pretty popular internet company called Groupon.\"\n\nTurn #8: Rafael Cortez said: \"Although I don't know a Tina who is into lace-making, Oliver, it's interesting that you mentioned Groupon. A friend of mine, Lee, is also associated with Groupon and his hobby is playing Go. It's an indoor hobby though and unlike your friend Tina, he favors evenings. Could they possibly know each other?\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ah, I see. While I don't personally know a Lee from Groupon, given the size and culture of such a company, it's highly likely that Tina and Lee might have crossed paths at some point. It's fascinating how these company connections work, isn't it? Speaking of companies, I have a friend, Raymond, who works at the Chicago Bridge & Iron Company. He loves foraging and usually does so in the morning, outdoors. Have you ever met him?\"\n\nTurn #10: Rafael Cortez said: \"I'm afraid I haven't met your friend Raymond from the Chicago Bridge & Iron Company, although I am appreciating amidst this conversation that our circles might have some overlaps, quite intriguing! On another note, Oliver, do you perhaps know a lady named Pamela? She spends her afternoons indulging in watching television and is associated with General Cable.\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Thompson said: \"Pamela from General Cable, you say? I don't think I've met her, but if she happens to know a Rafael from the same company who loves to kayak in the mornings, perhaps they do share a mutual connection! By the way, Rafael, do you know a Frances? She's into foraging, works for Expedia and tends to indulge in her hobby in the morning, indoors.\"\n\nTurn #12: Rafael Cortez said: \"As it happens, Oliver, I don't know a Frances who fits your description. However, it's interesting you mention foraging. I have a friend, Kristin, who enjoys a hobby slightly different than foraging, she's an animal fancy enthusiast. She spends afternoons indoors and works at the H. J. Heinz Company. Would she perchance know your friend Raymond? It's amazing how intertwined the world can be!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, Rafael, it is absolutely fascinating! I do not know if Raymond knows Kristin but given they both are in the same city, there is definitely a possibility of overlapping hobbies or career circles. It's truly a small world! By the way, do you know a Scott who works at Expedia and is into gaming? He prefers to indulge in his hobby in the afternoon, indoors.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nRafael Cortez's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nTina: Hobby: Lacemaking Company: Groupon Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRafael: Hobby: Kayaking Company: General Cable Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nWanda: Hobby: Weightlifting Company: Sauer-Danfoss Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRaymond: Hobby: Foraging Company: Chicago Bridge & Iron Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRicky: Hobby: Foraging Company: L. W. Seecamp Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRobert: Hobby: Foraging Company: Lennox International Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nFrances: Hobby: Foraging Company: Expedia Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nScott: Hobby: Gaming Company: Expedia Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nHelen: Hobby: Motor sports Company: Union Bank Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRobin: Hobby: Gaming Company: L. W. Seecamp Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nJames: Hobby: Vacation Company: Urban Outfitters Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening! I'm Rafael, a surgeon with a penchant for vintage medical memorabilia. And you are?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Pleasure to meet you, Rafael! I'm Oliver, an architect who enjoys expressing creativity through painting in my free time. Vintage medical memorabilia sounds fascinating! Do you engage in any outdoor activities by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Sure do, Oliver! I'm extremely fond of kayaking. It's a complete departure from my routine, you know, quite invigorating! One of my friends, Phil, is also quite the enthusiast. We often head out for a paddle in the evenings. Quite by chance, do you happen to know him? He works at H. J. Heinz Company.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"I'm afraid I don't know a Phil from H. J. Heinz Company. However, it's interesting to know you love kayaking. I have another friend who enjoys kayaking too and he prefers to do it in the morning. I wonder if you know him, his name is Rafael, and he works at General Cable. \"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's quite a coincidence, Rafael. Besides, I found that I tend to be more creative and productive in the morning, no wonder my friend Rafael prefers to do his kayaking in the morning as well. Do you know any morning people who have outdoor hobbies too?\"\n\nTurn #6: Rafael Cortez said: \"The early bird does catch the worm, as they say! My friend Tommy could attest to that. Like your friend Rafael, Tommy is a morning person who enjoys spending his outdoor time indulging his hobby of animal fancy. He works for H. J. Heinz, does that ring any bells?\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ah, Tommy from H. J. Heinz...unfortunately, I don't think I know him either. But it seems like we might have a wider circle of friends than we realize. By the way, Rafael, do you happen to know a lady named Tina? She loves lace-making and is a morning person who enjoys her hobby outdoors. She works for a pretty popular internet company called Groupon.\"\n\nTurn #8: Rafael Cortez said: \"Although I don't know a Tina who is into lace-making, Oliver, it's interesting that you mentioned Groupon. A friend of mine, Lee, is also associated with Groupon and his hobby is playing Go. It's an indoor hobby though and unlike your friend Tina, he favors evenings. Could they possibly know each other?\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ah, I see. While I don't personally know a Lee from Groupon, given the size and culture of such a company, it's highly likely that Tina and Lee might have crossed paths at some point. It's fascinating how these company connections work, isn't it? Speaking of companies, I have a friend, Raymond, who works at the Chicago Bridge & Iron Company. He loves foraging and usually does so in the morning, outdoors. Have you ever met him?\"\n\nTurn #10: Rafael Cortez said: \"I'm afraid I haven't met your friend Raymond from the Chicago Bridge & Iron Company, although I am appreciating amidst this conversation that our circles might have some overlaps, quite intriguing! On another note, Oliver, do you perhaps know a lady named Pamela? She spends her afternoons indulging in watching television and is associated with General Cable.\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Thompson said: \"Pamela from General Cable, you say? I don't think I've met her, but if she happens to know a Rafael from the same company who loves to kayak in the mornings, perhaps they do share a mutual connection! By the way, Rafael, do you know a Frances? She's into foraging, works for Expedia and tends to indulge in her hobby in the morning, indoors.\"\n\nTurn #12: Rafael Cortez said: \"As it happens, Oliver, I don't know a Frances who fits your description. However, it's interesting you mention foraging. I have a friend, Kristin, who enjoys a hobby slightly different than foraging, she's an animal fancy enthusiast. She spends afternoons indoors and works at the H. J. Heinz Company. Would she perchance know your friend Raymond? It's amazing how intertwined the world can be!\"\n\nTurn #13: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, Rafael, it is absolutely fascinating! I do not know if Raymond knows Kristin but given they both are in the same city, there is definitely a possibility of overlapping hobbies or career circles. It's truly a small world! By the way, do you know a Scott who works at Expedia and is into gaming? He prefers to indulge in his hobby in the afternoon, indoors.\"\n\nTurn #14: Rafael Cortez said: \"I'm afraid I don't personally know Scott from Expedia, but the coincidences we're finding are truly fascinating, Oliver! Speaking of gaming, a friend of mine, Christopher, is also into games. He plays Go rather than video games, and he, like Scott, enjoys his hobby in the evenings indoors. He's associated with McKinsey & Company. Does Christopher's name ring any bells with you by chance?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Christopher from McKinsey & Company... no, I'm afraid I don't know him personally. But it's interesting that he shares a love for gaming, just like Scott. Suddenly, it feels like it's a bit smaller world with all these overlaps, doesn't it? Moving to a slightly different interest, do you by any chance know my friend Wanda? She works at Sauer-Danfoss, loves weightlifting, and also enjoys early mornings outdoors - quite a unique combination, isn't it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nRafael Cortez's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nTina: Hobby: Lacemaking Company: Groupon Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRafael: Hobby: Kayaking Company: General Cable Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nWanda: Hobby: Weightlifting Company: Sauer-Danfoss Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRaymond: Hobby: Foraging Company: Chicago Bridge & Iron Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRicky: Hobby: Foraging Company: L. W. Seecamp Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRobert: Hobby: Foraging Company: Lennox International Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nFrances: Hobby: Foraging Company: Expedia Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nScott: Hobby: Gaming Company: Expedia Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nHelen: Hobby: Motor sports Company: Union Bank Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRobin: Hobby: Gaming Company: L. W. Seecamp Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nJames: Hobby: Vacation Company: Urban Outfitters Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening! I'm Rafael, a surgeon with a penchant for vintage medical memorabilia. And you are?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Pleasure to meet you, Rafael! I'm Oliver, an architect who enjoys expressing creativity through painting in my free time. Vintage medical memorabilia sounds fascinating! Do you engage in any outdoor activities by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Sure do, Oliver! I'm extremely fond of kayaking. It's a complete departure from my routine, you know, quite invigorating! One of my friends, Phil, is also quite the enthusiast. We often head out for a paddle in the evenings. Quite by chance, do you happen to know him? He works at H. J. Heinz Company.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"I'm afraid I don't know a Phil from H. J. Heinz Company. However, it's interesting to know you love kayaking. I have another friend who enjoys kayaking too and he prefers to do it in the morning. I wonder if you know him, his name is Rafael, and he works at General Cable. \"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's quite a coincidence, Rafael. Besides, I found that I tend to be more creative and productive in the morning, no wonder my friend Rafael prefers to do his kayaking in the morning as well. Do you know any morning people who have outdoor hobbies too?\"\n\nTurn #6: Rafael Cortez said: \"The early bird does catch the worm, as they say! My friend Tommy could attest to that. Like your friend Rafael, Tommy is a morning person who enjoys spending his outdoor time indulging his hobby of animal fancy. He works for H. J. Heinz, does that ring any bells?\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ah, Tommy from H. J. Heinz...unfortunately, I don't think I know him either. But it seems like we might have a wider circle of friends than we realize. By the way, Rafael, do you happen to know a lady named Tina? She loves lace-making and is a morning person who enjoys her hobby outdoors. She works for a pretty popular internet company called Groupon.\"\n\nTurn #8: Rafael Cortez said: \"Although I don't know a Tina who is into lace-making, Oliver, it's interesting that you mentioned Groupon. A friend of mine, Lee, is also associated with Groupon and his hobby is playing Go. It's an indoor hobby though and unlike your friend Tina, he favors evenings. Could they possibly know each other?\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ah, I see. While I don't personally know a Lee from Groupon, given the size and culture of such a company, it's highly likely that Tina and Lee might have crossed paths at some point. It's fascinating how these company connections work, isn't it? Speaking of companies, I have a friend, Raymond, who works at the Chicago Bridge & Iron Company. He loves foraging and usually does so in the morning, outdoors. Have you ever met him?\"\n\nTurn #10: Rafael Cortez said: \"I'm afraid I haven't met your friend Raymond from the Chicago Bridge & Iron Company, although I am appreciating amidst this conversation that our circles might have some overlaps, quite intriguing! On another note, Oliver, do you perhaps know a lady named Pamela? She spends her afternoons indulging in watching television and is associated with General Cable.\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Thompson said: \"Pamela from General Cable, you say? I don't think I've met her, but if she happens to know a Rafael from the same company who loves to kayak in the mornings, perhaps they do share a mutual connection! By the way, Rafael, do you know a Frances? She's into foraging, works for Expedia and tends to indulge in her hobby in the morning, indoors.\"\n\nTurn #12: Rafael Cortez said: \"As it happens, Oliver, I don't know a Frances who fits your description. However, it's interesting you mention foraging. I have a friend, Kristin, who enjoys a hobby slightly different than foraging, she's an animal fancy enthusiast. She spends afternoons indoors and works at the H. J. Heinz Company. Would she perchance know your friend Raymond? It's amazing how intertwined the world can be!\"\n\nTurn #13: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, Rafael, it is absolutely fascinating! I do not know if Raymond knows Kristin but given they both are in the same city, there is definitely a possibility of overlapping hobbies or career circles. It's truly a small world! By the way, do you know a Scott who works at Expedia and is into gaming? He prefers to indulge in his hobby in the afternoon, indoors.\"\n\nTurn #14: Rafael Cortez said: \"I'm afraid I don't personally know Scott from Expedia, but the coincidences we're finding are truly fascinating, Oliver! Speaking of gaming, a friend of mine, Christopher, is also into games. He plays Go rather than video games, and he, like Scott, enjoys his hobby in the evenings indoors. He's associated with McKinsey & Company. Does Christopher's name ring any bells with you by chance?\"\n\nTurn #15: Oliver Thompson said: \"Christopher from McKinsey & Company... no, I'm afraid I don't know him personally. But it's interesting that he shares a love for gaming, just like Scott. Suddenly, it feels like it's a bit smaller world with all these overlaps, doesn't it? Moving to a slightly different interest, do you by any chance know my friend Wanda? She works at Sauer-Danfoss, loves weightlifting, and also enjoys early mornings outdoors - quite a unique combination, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #16: Rafael Cortez said: \"Quite a combination indeed, Oliver! Wanda seems like an interesting character. Though I don't personally know her, her passion for weightlifting reminds me of my friend Phillip, he enjoys kayaking and works at Sauer-Danfoss. He prefers the afternoon for his outdoor activities, however. Could they know each other, given their shared workplace?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'It seems quite possible, Rafael, given their shared workplace and love for outdoor activities. After all, we never know how closely our circles might intersect! Speaking of intersecting circles, I have a friend named Robin who is into gaming and works at L. W. Seecamp Company. She enjoys her hobby in the evenings, outside. I wonder if they have crossed paths with your friend Christopher from McKinsey & Company who is also into games?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nRafael Cortez's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nTina: Hobby: Lacemaking Company: Groupon Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRafael: Hobby: Kayaking Company: General Cable Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nWanda: Hobby: Weightlifting Company: Sauer-Danfoss Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRaymond: Hobby: Foraging Company: Chicago Bridge & Iron Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRicky: Hobby: Foraging Company: L. W. Seecamp Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRobert: Hobby: Foraging Company: Lennox International Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nFrances: Hobby: Foraging Company: Expedia Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nScott: Hobby: Gaming Company: Expedia Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nHelen: Hobby: Motor sports Company: Union Bank Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRobin: Hobby: Gaming Company: L. W. Seecamp Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nJames: Hobby: Vacation Company: Urban Outfitters Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening! I'm Rafael, a surgeon with a penchant for vintage medical memorabilia. And you are?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Pleasure to meet you, Rafael! I'm Oliver, an architect who enjoys expressing creativity through painting in my free time. Vintage medical memorabilia sounds fascinating! Do you engage in any outdoor activities by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Sure do, Oliver! I'm extremely fond of kayaking. It's a complete departure from my routine, you know, quite invigorating! One of my friends, Phil, is also quite the enthusiast. We often head out for a paddle in the evenings. Quite by chance, do you happen to know him? He works at H. J. Heinz Company.\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"I'm afraid I don't know a Phil from H. J. Heinz Company. However, it's interesting to know you love kayaking. I have another friend who enjoys kayaking too and he prefers to do it in the morning. I wonder if you know him, his name is Rafael, and he works at General Cable. \"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's quite a coincidence, Rafael. Besides, I found that I tend to be more creative and productive in the morning, no wonder my friend Rafael prefers to do his kayaking in the morning as well. Do you know any morning people who have outdoor hobbies too?\"\n\nTurn #6: Rafael Cortez said: \"The early bird does catch the worm, as they say! My friend Tommy could attest to that. Like your friend Rafael, Tommy is a morning person who enjoys spending his outdoor time indulging his hobby of animal fancy. He works for H. J. Heinz, does that ring any bells?\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ah, Tommy from H. J. Heinz...unfortunately, I don't think I know him either. But it seems like we might have a wider circle of friends than we realize. By the way, Rafael, do you happen to know a lady named Tina? She loves lace-making and is a morning person who enjoys her hobby outdoors. She works for a pretty popular internet company called Groupon.\"\n\nTurn #8: Rafael Cortez said: \"Although I don't know a Tina who is into lace-making, Oliver, it's interesting that you mentioned Groupon. A friend of mine, Lee, is also associated with Groupon and his hobby is playing Go. It's an indoor hobby though and unlike your friend Tina, he favors evenings. Could they possibly know each other?\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ah, I see. While I don't personally know a Lee from Groupon, given the size and culture of such a company, it's highly likely that Tina and Lee might have crossed paths at some point. It's fascinating how these company connections work, isn't it? Speaking of companies, I have a friend, Raymond, who works at the Chicago Bridge & Iron Company. He loves foraging and usually does so in the morning, outdoors. Have you ever met him?\"\n\nTurn #10: Rafael Cortez said: \"I'm afraid I haven't met your friend Raymond from the Chicago Bridge & Iron Company, although I am appreciating amidst this conversation that our circles might have some overlaps, quite intriguing! On another note, Oliver, do you perhaps know a lady named Pamela? She spends her afternoons indulging in watching television and is associated with General Cable.\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Thompson said: \"Pamela from General Cable, you say? I don't think I've met her, but if she happens to know a Rafael from the same company who loves to kayak in the mornings, perhaps they do share a mutual connection! By the way, Rafael, do you know a Frances? She's into foraging, works for Expedia and tends to indulge in her hobby in the morning, indoors.\"\n\nTurn #12: Rafael Cortez said: \"As it happens, Oliver, I don't know a Frances who fits your description. However, it's interesting you mention foraging. I have a friend, Kristin, who enjoys a hobby slightly different than foraging, she's an animal fancy enthusiast. She spends afternoons indoors and works at the H. J. Heinz Company. Would she perchance know your friend Raymond? It's amazing how intertwined the world can be!\"\n\nTurn #13: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, Rafael, it is absolutely fascinating! I do not know if Raymond knows Kristin but given they both are in the same city, there is definitely a possibility of overlapping hobbies or career circles. It's truly a small world! By the way, do you know a Scott who works at Expedia and is into gaming? He prefers to indulge in his hobby in the afternoon, indoors.\"\n\nTurn #14: Rafael Cortez said: \"I'm afraid I don't personally know Scott from Expedia, but the coincidences we're finding are truly fascinating, Oliver! Speaking of gaming, a friend of mine, Christopher, is also into games. He plays Go rather than video games, and he, like Scott, enjoys his hobby in the evenings indoors. He's associated with McKinsey & Company. Does Christopher's name ring any bells with you by chance?\"\n\nTurn #15: Oliver Thompson said: \"Christopher from McKinsey & Company... no, I'm afraid I don't know him personally. But it's interesting that he shares a love for gaming, just like Scott. Suddenly, it feels like it's a bit smaller world with all these overlaps, doesn't it? Moving to a slightly different interest, do you by any chance know my friend Wanda? She works at Sauer-Danfoss, loves weightlifting, and also enjoys early mornings outdoors - quite a unique combination, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #16: Rafael Cortez said: \"Quite a combination indeed, Oliver! Wanda seems like an interesting character. Though I don't personally know her, her passion for weightlifting reminds me of my friend Phillip, he enjoys kayaking and works at Sauer-Danfoss. He prefers the afternoon for his outdoor activities, however. Could they know each other, given their shared workplace?\"\n\nTurn #17: Oliver Thompson said: \"It seems quite possible, Rafael, given their shared workplace and love for outdoor activities. After all, we never know how closely our circles might intersect! Speaking of intersecting circles, I have a friend named Robin who is into gaming and works at L. W. Seecamp Company. She enjoys her hobby in the evenings, outside. I wonder if they have crossed paths with your friend Christopher from McKinsey & Company who is also into games?\"\n\nTurn #18: Rafael Cortez said: \"A gaming enthusiast at L. W. Seecamp Company, you say? Regrettably, I don't know her personally. And while Christopher is indeed a gaming enthusiast, his preference is for the game of Go and he likes to spend his evenings indoors. I wonder if that resonates with your friend Robin's experiences. It's truly fascinating how our networks may overlap in unexpected ways, isn't it, Oliver?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #19. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Rafael, it's truly a rhyme of life! By the way, I have another friend named James who works at a trendy retail company, Urban Outfitters. He enjoys vacationing and usually does that in the morning, preferably outdoors. Could it be possible that you guys share a mutual connection?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nZane Bennett's background: \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nChris: Hobby: Mountain biking Company: Henry Schein, Inc. \nChester: Hobby: Surfing Company: Maxim Integrated \nWendell: Hobby: Surfing Company: Maxim Integrated \nDemetrius: Hobby: Mountain biking Company: Maxim Integrated \nJacob: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Maxim Integrated \n\nZane Bennett's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Hey, nice to meet you, Zane. You look like someone who enjoys different kinds of activities. Do you have any weekend hobbies? I personally indulge in biking and photography.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nZane Bennett's background: \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nChris: Hobby: Mountain biking Company: Henry Schein, Inc. \nChester: Hobby: Surfing Company: Maxim Integrated \nWendell: Hobby: Surfing Company: Maxim Integrated \nDemetrius: Hobby: Mountain biking Company: Maxim Integrated \nJacob: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Maxim Integrated \n\nZane Bennett's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hey, nice to meet you, Zane. You look like someone who enjoys different kinds of activities. Do you have any weekend hobbies? I personally indulge in biking and photography.\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Great to meet you too, Giselle. Biking and photography, those are pretty cool. I'm more into the creative side of things. Music has always been my refuge. I also play the guitar in my free time. But you know what's interesting? My friend Joseph, is really unique. He got into target shooting as a weekend hobby. Have you ever tried it, or perhaps know someone who is into it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Target shooting! That's a bit of a coincidence. I don't know much about it. But, one of my acquaintances, Jacob, is into shooting sports as a hobby. You mentioned playing guitar - any chance you're familiar with the company Maxim Integrated? They do some fascinating work with audio technologies, and I know a few people who've interned there. \"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nZane Bennett's background: \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nChris: Hobby: Mountain biking Company: Henry Schein, Inc. \nChester: Hobby: Surfing Company: Maxim Integrated \nWendell: Hobby: Surfing Company: Maxim Integrated \nDemetrius: Hobby: Mountain biking Company: Maxim Integrated \nJacob: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Maxim Integrated \n\nZane Bennett's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hey, nice to meet you, Zane. You look like someone who enjoys different kinds of activities. Do you have any weekend hobbies? I personally indulge in biking and photography.\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Great to meet you too, Giselle. Biking and photography, those are pretty cool. I'm more into the creative side of things. Music has always been my refuge. I also play the guitar in my free time. But you know what's interesting? My friend Joseph, is really unique. He got into target shooting as a weekend hobby. Have you ever tried it, or perhaps know someone who is into it?\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Target shooting! That's a bit of a coincidence. I don't know much about it. But, one of my acquaintances, Jacob, is into shooting sports as a hobby. You mentioned playing guitar - any chance you're familiar with the company Maxim Integrated? They do some fascinating work with audio technologies, and I know a few people who've interned there. \"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"Oh, Jacob, you say? Maybe it's more common than I thought! And yes, I've heard about Maxim Integrated, although I haven't had a chance to explore them personally. Speaking of companies though, a couple of my friends work for BP and Gordon Food Service. Ever connected with anyone from there?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"BP and Gordon Food Service, huh? I can't say I remember anyone specifically from those companies. However, I do have a friend named Chris who's really into the corporate world and loves mountain biking too. Funny how people's hobbies can span such diverse interests. Have you ever met someone like that?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nZane Bennett's background: \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nChris: Hobby: Mountain biking Company: Henry Schein, Inc. \nChester: Hobby: Surfing Company: Maxim Integrated \nWendell: Hobby: Surfing Company: Maxim Integrated \nDemetrius: Hobby: Mountain biking Company: Maxim Integrated \nJacob: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Maxim Integrated \n\nZane Bennett's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hey, nice to meet you, Zane. You look like someone who enjoys different kinds of activities. Do you have any weekend hobbies? I personally indulge in biking and photography.\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Great to meet you too, Giselle. Biking and photography, those are pretty cool. I'm more into the creative side of things. Music has always been my refuge. I also play the guitar in my free time. But you know what's interesting? My friend Joseph, is really unique. He got into target shooting as a weekend hobby. Have you ever tried it, or perhaps know someone who is into it?\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Target shooting! That's a bit of a coincidence. I don't know much about it. But, one of my acquaintances, Jacob, is into shooting sports as a hobby. You mentioned playing guitar - any chance you're familiar with the company Maxim Integrated? They do some fascinating work with audio technologies, and I know a few people who've interned there. \"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"Oh, Jacob, you say? Maybe it's more common than I thought! And yes, I've heard about Maxim Integrated, although I haven't had a chance to explore them personally. Speaking of companies though, a couple of my friends work for BP and Gordon Food Service. Ever connected with anyone from there?\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"BP and Gordon Food Service, huh? I can't say I remember anyone specifically from those companies. However, I do have a friend named Chris who's really into the corporate world and loves mountain biking too. Funny how people's hobbies can span such diverse interests. Have you ever met someone like that?\"\n\nTurn #5: Zane Bennett said: \"It's amazing to see how people merge their professional life with their personal interests, isn't it? Like my friend Murray, who is in corporate, but also loves skateboarding. He always says that it's the balance that keeps him going. You mentioned photography earlier. Are you fond of nature photography? My friend Lillian has this unusual hobby - she collects elements and it led her to have an appreciation for nature as well.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Lillian's hobby is indeed unusual, but seems quite fascinating. And yes, I simply adore nature photography. There's this inherent beauty, a certain serene quality about capturing the elements of nature in their raw form. You know, I have some friends who indulge in outdoor activities like mountain biking and surfing. Surfing especially with the ocean and sky, provides fantastic photography opportunities. Do any of your friends share a similar interest in these activities?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Zane Bennett, your task is to act/speak as Zane Bennett would, keeping in mind Zane Bennett's social goal.\nYou can find Zane Bennett's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Zane Bennett's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Zane Bennett's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: \nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. Personality and values description: Zane Bennett is creative and outgoing, he values achievement and fairness. His decision-making is unique, often finding novel solutions to problems. Zane's secrets: He's secretly engaged to his best friend's ex.\nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Unknown\nZane Bennett's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends \nJoseph: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: BP \nLillian: Hobby: Element collecting Company: Gordon Food Service \nVivian: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Gordon Food Service \nMurray: Hobby: Skateboarding Company: BP \nJacob: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Maxim Integrated\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hey, nice to meet you, Zane. You look like someone who enjoys different kinds of activities. Do you have any weekend hobbies? I personally indulge in biking and photography.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Great to meet you too, Giselle. Biking and photography, those are pretty cool. I'm more into the creative side of things. Music has always been my refuge. I also play the guitar in my free time. But you know what's interesting? My friend Joseph, is really unique. He got into target shooting as a weekend hobby. Have you ever tried it, or perhaps know someone who is into it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nZane Bennett's background: \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nChris: Hobby: Mountain biking Company: Henry Schein, Inc. \nChester: Hobby: Surfing Company: Maxim Integrated \nWendell: Hobby: Surfing Company: Maxim Integrated \nDemetrius: Hobby: Mountain biking Company: Maxim Integrated \nJacob: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Maxim Integrated \n\nZane Bennett's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hey, nice to meet you, Zane. You look like someone who enjoys different kinds of activities. Do you have any weekend hobbies? I personally indulge in biking and photography.\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Great to meet you too, Giselle. Biking and photography, those are pretty cool. I'm more into the creative side of things. Music has always been my refuge. I also play the guitar in my free time. But you know what's interesting? My friend Joseph, is really unique. He got into target shooting as a weekend hobby. Have you ever tried it, or perhaps know someone who is into it?\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Target shooting! That's a bit of a coincidence. I don't know much about it. But, one of my acquaintances, Jacob, is into shooting sports as a hobby. You mentioned playing guitar - any chance you're familiar with the company Maxim Integrated? They do some fascinating work with audio technologies, and I know a few people who've interned there. \"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"Oh, Jacob, you say? Maybe it's more common than I thought! And yes, I've heard about Maxim Integrated, although I haven't had a chance to explore them personally. Speaking of companies though, a couple of my friends work for BP and Gordon Food Service. Ever connected with anyone from there?\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"BP and Gordon Food Service, huh? I can't say I remember anyone specifically from those companies. However, I do have a friend named Chris who's really into the corporate world and loves mountain biking too. Funny how people's hobbies can span such diverse interests. Have you ever met someone like that?\"\n\nTurn #5: Zane Bennett said: \"It's amazing to see how people merge their professional life with their personal interests, isn't it? Like my friend Murray, who is in corporate, but also loves skateboarding. He always says that it's the balance that keeps him going. You mentioned photography earlier. Are you fond of nature photography? My friend Lillian has this unusual hobby - she collects elements and it led her to have an appreciation for nature as well.\"\n\nTurn #6: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Lillian's hobby is indeed unusual, but seems quite fascinating. And yes, I simply adore nature photography. There's this inherent beauty, a certain serene quality about capturing the elements of nature in their raw form. You know, I have some friends who indulge in outdoor activities like mountain biking and surfing. Surfing especially with the ocean and sky, provides fantastic photography opportunities. Do any of your friends share a similar interest in these activities?\"\n\nTurn #7: \n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Zane Bennett, your task is to act/speak as Zane Bennett would, keeping in mind Zane Bennett's social goal.\nYou can find Zane Bennett's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Zane Bennett's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Zane Bennett's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: \nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. Personality and values description: Zane Bennett is creative and outgoing, he values achievement and fairness. His decision-making is unique, often finding novel solutions to problems. Zane's secrets: He's secretly engaged to his best friend's ex.\nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Unknown\nZane Bennett's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends \nJoseph: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: BP \nLillian: Hobby: Element collecting Company: Gordon Food Service \nVivian: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Gordon Food Service \nMurray: Hobby: Skateboarding Company: BP \nJacob: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Maxim Integrated\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hey, nice to meet you, Zane. You look like someone who enjoys different kinds of activities. Do you have any weekend hobbies? I personally indulge in biking and photography.\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Great to meet you too, Giselle. Biking and photography, those are pretty cool. I'm more into the creative side of things. Music has always been my refuge. I also play the guitar in my free time. But you know what's interesting? My friend Joseph, is really unique. He got into target shooting as a weekend hobby. Have you ever tried it, or perhaps know someone who is into it?\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Target shooting! That's a bit of a coincidence. I don't know much about it. But, one of my acquaintances, Jacob, is into shooting sports as a hobby. You mentioned playing guitar - any chance you're familiar with the company Maxim Integrated? They do some fascinating work with audio technologies, and I know a few people who've interned there. \"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oh, Jacob, you say? Maybe it's more common than I thought! And yes, I've heard about Maxim Integrated, although I haven't had a chance to explore them personally. Speaking of companies though, a couple of my friends work for BP and Gordon Food Service. Ever connected with anyone from there?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Zane Bennett, your task is to act/speak as Zane Bennett would, keeping in mind Zane Bennett's social goal.\nYou can find Zane Bennett's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Zane Bennett's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Zane Bennett's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: \nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. Personality and values description: Zane Bennett is creative and outgoing, he values achievement and fairness. His decision-making is unique, often finding novel solutions to problems. Zane's secrets: He's secretly engaged to his best friend's ex.\nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Unknown\nZane Bennett's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends \nJoseph: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: BP \nLillian: Hobby: Element collecting Company: Gordon Food Service \nVivian: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Gordon Food Service \nMurray: Hobby: Skateboarding Company: BP \nJacob: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Maxim Integrated\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hey, nice to meet you, Zane. You look like someone who enjoys different kinds of activities. Do you have any weekend hobbies? I personally indulge in biking and photography.\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Great to meet you too, Giselle. Biking and photography, those are pretty cool. I'm more into the creative side of things. Music has always been my refuge. I also play the guitar in my free time. But you know what's interesting? My friend Joseph, is really unique. He got into target shooting as a weekend hobby. Have you ever tried it, or perhaps know someone who is into it?\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Target shooting! That's a bit of a coincidence. I don't know much about it. But, one of my acquaintances, Jacob, is into shooting sports as a hobby. You mentioned playing guitar - any chance you're familiar with the company Maxim Integrated? They do some fascinating work with audio technologies, and I know a few people who've interned there. \"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"Oh, Jacob, you say? Maybe it's more common than I thought! And yes, I've heard about Maxim Integrated, although I haven't had a chance to explore them personally. Speaking of companies though, a couple of my friends work for BP and Gordon Food Service. Ever connected with anyone from there?\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"BP and Gordon Food Service, huh? I can't say I remember anyone specifically from those companies. However, I do have a friend named Chris who's really into the corporate world and loves mountain biking too. Funny how people's hobbies can span such diverse interests. Have you ever met someone like that?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"It's amazing to see how people merge their professional life with their personal interests, isn't it? Like my friend Murray, who is in corporate, but also loves skateboarding. He always says that it's the balance that keeps him going. You mentioned photography earlier. Are you fond of nature photography? My friend Lillian has this unusual hobby - she collects elements and it led her to have an appreciation for nature as well.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Zane Bennett, your task is to act/speak as Zane Bennett would, keeping in mind Zane Bennett's social goal.\nYou can find Zane Bennett's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Zane Bennett's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Zane Bennett's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: \nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. Personality and values description: Zane Bennett is creative and outgoing, he values achievement and fairness. His decision-making is unique, often finding novel solutions to problems. Zane's secrets: He's secretly engaged to his best friend's ex.\nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Unknown\nZane Bennett's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends \nJoseph: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: BP \nLillian: Hobby: Element collecting Company: Gordon Food Service \nVivian: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Gordon Food Service \nMurray: Hobby: Skateboarding Company: BP \nJacob: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Maxim Integrated\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hey, nice to meet you, Zane. You look like someone who enjoys different kinds of activities. Do you have any weekend hobbies? I personally indulge in biking and photography.\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Great to meet you too, Giselle. Biking and photography, those are pretty cool. I'm more into the creative side of things. Music has always been my refuge. I also play the guitar in my free time. But you know what's interesting? My friend Joseph, is really unique. He got into target shooting as a weekend hobby. Have you ever tried it, or perhaps know someone who is into it?\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Target shooting! That's a bit of a coincidence. I don't know much about it. But, one of my acquaintances, Jacob, is into shooting sports as a hobby. You mentioned playing guitar - any chance you're familiar with the company Maxim Integrated? They do some fascinating work with audio technologies, and I know a few people who've interned there. \"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"Oh, Jacob, you say? Maybe it's more common than I thought! And yes, I've heard about Maxim Integrated, although I haven't had a chance to explore them personally. Speaking of companies though, a couple of my friends work for BP and Gordon Food Service. Ever connected with anyone from there?\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"BP and Gordon Food Service, huh? I can't say I remember anyone specifically from those companies. However, I do have a friend named Chris who's really into the corporate world and loves mountain biking too. Funny how people's hobbies can span such diverse interests. Have you ever met someone like that?\"\n\nTurn #5: Zane Bennett said: \"It's amazing to see how people merge their professional life with their personal interests, isn't it? Like my friend Murray, who is in corporate, but also loves skateboarding. He always says that it's the balance that keeps him going. You mentioned photography earlier. Are you fond of nature photography? My friend Lillian has this unusual hobby - she collects elements and it led her to have an appreciation for nature as well.\"\n\nTurn #6: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Lillian's hobby is indeed unusual, but seems quite fascinating. And yes, I simply adore nature photography. There's this inherent beauty, a certain serene quality about capturing the elements of nature in their raw form. You know, I have some friends who indulge in outdoor activities like mountain biking and surfing. Surfing especially with the ocean and sky, provides fantastic photography opportunities. Do any of your friends share a similar interest in these activities?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are meeting for the first time at a social event. They find each other attractive and decide to engage in a conversation\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Gwen Pierce\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nGwen Pierce's background: \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Flirt with the other person (Extra information: you are attracted to the other person and want to build a romantic relationship with them)\nGwen Pierce's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Evening, Miss Pierce. Love a gathering like this, it's almost as enchanting as the sea at dawn. Have you ever had a chance to enjoy its tranquility?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are meeting for the first time at a social event. They find each other attractive and decide to engage in a conversation\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Gwen Pierce\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nGwen Pierce's background: \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Flirt with the other person (Extra information: you are attracted to the other person and want to build a romantic relationship with them)\nGwen Pierce's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Evening, Miss Pierce. Love a gathering like this, it's almost as enchanting as the sea at dawn. Have you ever had a chance to enjoy its tranquility?\"\n\nTurn #1: Gwen Pierce said: \"Lovely to meet you, Finnegan! The tranquility of the sea at dawn sounds divine, indeed. However, my mornings usually begin with peace of a different kind, knitting with my two adopted cats curled up beside me. Do you have a similar peaceful routine or any hobbies yourself?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ah, the comfort of companions, I can well appreciate that, Miss Pierce. My own mornings are usually spent painting the seascapes, a calming routine. The play of light on the water, it's quite fascinating. Perhaps someday you'd like to witness it yourself?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are meeting for the first time at a social event. They find each other attractive and decide to engage in a conversation\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Gwen Pierce\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nGwen Pierce's background: \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Flirt with the other person (Extra information: you are attracted to the other person and want to build a romantic relationship with them)\nGwen Pierce's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Evening, Miss Pierce. Love a gathering like this, it's almost as enchanting as the sea at dawn. Have you ever had a chance to enjoy its tranquility?\"\n\nTurn #1: Gwen Pierce said: \"Lovely to meet you, Finnegan! The tranquility of the sea at dawn sounds divine, indeed. However, my mornings usually begin with peace of a different kind, knitting with my two adopted cats curled up beside me. Do you have a similar peaceful routine or any hobbies yourself?\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, the comfort of companions, I can well appreciate that, Miss Pierce. My own mornings are usually spent painting the seascapes, a calming routine. The play of light on the water, it's quite fascinating. Perhaps someday you'd like to witness it yourself?\"\n\nTurn #3: Gwen Pierce said: \"Painting seascapes in the morning sounds like a fulfilling way to start your day, Finnegan. Your connection to the sea is palpable, and that's wonderfully unique. I'd be lying if I said I wasn't intrigued by the prospect of witnessing a sunrise at sea. However, my terror of water might get in the way. It's truly amazing how different our fears and fascinations can be, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Indeed, contrasting fascinations do make life interesting. As for your fear of water, Miss Pierce, it's perfectly natural. Yet, the sea isn't as daunting as it seems from afar, it's beguiling rather. Life at the lighthouse is full of such quiet allure. Maybe I could share it with you sometime...a sunrise viewing from a safe spot, perhaps? With your knitting and cats as companions, of course.\"\n\nTurn #5: Gwen Pierce said: \"That sounds like a gentle way to experience the sea, Finnegan. I'm a big fan of tranquil, quiet mornings, and your lighthouse life certainly sounds appealing in its own manner. I guess it's a date then, sunrise viewing at the lighthouse, with my knitting supplies and cats in tow. Now, have you ever tried your hand at knitting or have any interest in learning? It's surprisingly therapeutic.\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, knitting, now that's a craft I've yet to master, Miss Pierce. Perhaps you can guide me on it someday? In exchange, I could teach you to capture tranquility onto a canvas, a therapeutic activity in its own right. Our fears and fascinations combined might lead to some beautiful mornings.\"\n\nTurn #7: Gwen Pierce said: \"That sounds like a lovely exchange, Finnegan. I'd be more than happy to guide you into the world of knitting and equally thrilled to learn about painting. I've always found it to be a fascinating form of expression. It seems we have planned some beautiful mornings ahead of us, haven't we?\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Indeed, Miss Pierce, we have. Life can often surprise us with beautiful moments when we least expect them. I'm looking forward to our serene mornings and the exchange of passions. Shall we drink to that and the unknown adventures that await us?\"\n\nTurn #9: Gwen Pierce said: \"Absolutely, Finnegan. Let's toast to the exquisite mornings, unique experiences, and beautiful moments that lie ahead. I'm truly looking forward to them.\"\n\nTurn #10: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Here's to that, Miss Pierce. To the dawns, the learning and the joys that our unique interests will bestow upon us. I'm eager for what the future has to offer. But for now, let's bask in the magic of this splendid evening.\"\n\nTurn #11: Gwen Pierce said: \"Couldn't agree more, Finnegan. This evening itself is a testament to the unexpected beauty life offers. Let's indeed take a moment to appreciate it. After all, the future mornings we anticipate will be even more wonderful if we cherish the present, right?\"\n\nTurn #12: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Aye, you're right, Miss Pierce. Enjoying the present paves the way for brighter dawns. Tonight, let's delve deeper into each other's worlds. Tell me about your cats, I'm sure they're as delightful as their owner.\"\n\nTurn #13: Gwen Pierce said: \"My cats are indeed a delight, Finnegan. Moe and Pearl, they've given my quiet home a whirlwind of energy, each in their own unique way. Moe is wildly curious, while Pearl is a comforting presence, always there when you need company. Both have enriched my life in ways I never imagined. I'm guessing life at the lighthouse can be quite solitary at times, how do you fill those moments?\"\n\nTurn #14: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Indeed, solitude envelops the lighthouse more often than one might think, Miss Pierce. I find solace in that stillness, immersing myself in painting and indulging in books. It's the sea and her stories that fill those moments for me. Moe and Pearl sound like wonderful companions, though. Perhaps, I might get to meet these lively characters when we have our sunrise viewing?\"\n\nTurn #15: Gwen Pierce said: \"Moe and Pearl would surely enjoy some new company, Finnegan. The solitude at your lighthouse is such a contrast to my bustling mornings with their antics. Isn't it fascinating? The way life has different routines in store for us? Yet, with our forthcoming sunrise viewing, it seems we're on the verge of blending these contrasting worlds together. I must admit I'm looking forward to that.\"\n\nTurn #16: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Life is diverse in its offerings, isn't it Miss Pierce? The buzzing effervescence of your mornings and the undisturbed serenity of my own, it would be intriguing to see them intertwine. I'm equally eager for our upcoming peaceful dawn together. It's fascinating to hear about Moe and Pearl, I anticipate meeting them, and of course, knowing more about you in our shared mornings. Now, how's that for blending our contrasting worlds together?\"\n\nTurn #17: Gwen Pierce said: \"Finnegan, I am equally eager to witness our contrasting worlds intertwine. It promises to be an enriching experience, getting to know you amidst the backdrop of our shared mornings. Isn't that the beauty of life? The way different routines and interests weave together to create unique experiences. I am indeed looking forward to it!\"\n\nTurn #18: \n\nTurn #19: \n.\nYou are at Turn #20. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are meeting for the first time at a social event. They find each other attractive and decide to engage in a conversation\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Gwen Pierce\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nGwen Pierce's background: \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Flirt with the other person (Extra information: you are attracted to the other person and want to build a romantic relationship with them)\nGwen Pierce's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Evening, Miss Pierce. Love a gathering like this, it's almost as enchanting as the sea at dawn. Have you ever had a chance to enjoy its tranquility?\"\n\nTurn #1: Gwen Pierce said: \"Lovely to meet you, Finnegan! The tranquility of the sea at dawn sounds divine, indeed. However, my mornings usually begin with peace of a different kind, knitting with my two adopted cats curled up beside me. Do you have a similar peaceful routine or any hobbies yourself?\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, the comfort of companions, I can well appreciate that, Miss Pierce. My own mornings are usually spent painting the seascapes, a calming routine. The play of light on the water, it's quite fascinating. Perhaps someday you'd like to witness it yourself?\"\n\nTurn #3: Gwen Pierce said: \"Painting seascapes in the morning sounds like a fulfilling way to start your day, Finnegan. Your connection to the sea is palpable, and that's wonderfully unique. I'd be lying if I said I wasn't intrigued by the prospect of witnessing a sunrise at sea. However, my terror of water might get in the way. It's truly amazing how different our fears and fascinations can be, isn't it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, contrasting fascinations do make life interesting. As for your fear of water, Miss Pierce, it's perfectly natural. Yet, the sea isn't as daunting as it seems from afar, it's beguiling rather. Life at the lighthouse is full of such quiet allure. Maybe I could share it with you sometime...a sunrise viewing from a safe spot, perhaps? With your knitting and cats as companions, of course.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are meeting for the first time at a social event. They find each other attractive and decide to engage in a conversation\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Gwen Pierce\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nGwen Pierce's background: \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Flirt with the other person (Extra information: you are attracted to the other person and want to build a romantic relationship with them)\nGwen Pierce's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Evening, Miss Pierce. Love a gathering like this, it's almost as enchanting as the sea at dawn. Have you ever had a chance to enjoy its tranquility?\"\n\nTurn #1: Gwen Pierce said: \"Lovely to meet you, Finnegan! The tranquility of the sea at dawn sounds divine, indeed. However, my mornings usually begin with peace of a different kind, knitting with my two adopted cats curled up beside me. Do you have a similar peaceful routine or any hobbies yourself?\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, the comfort of companions, I can well appreciate that, Miss Pierce. My own mornings are usually spent painting the seascapes, a calming routine. The play of light on the water, it's quite fascinating. Perhaps someday you'd like to witness it yourself?\"\n\nTurn #3: Gwen Pierce said: \"Painting seascapes in the morning sounds like a fulfilling way to start your day, Finnegan. Your connection to the sea is palpable, and that's wonderfully unique. I'd be lying if I said I wasn't intrigued by the prospect of witnessing a sunrise at sea. However, my terror of water might get in the way. It's truly amazing how different our fears and fascinations can be, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Indeed, contrasting fascinations do make life interesting. As for your fear of water, Miss Pierce, it's perfectly natural. Yet, the sea isn't as daunting as it seems from afar, it's beguiling rather. Life at the lighthouse is full of such quiet allure. Maybe I could share it with you sometime...a sunrise viewing from a safe spot, perhaps? With your knitting and cats as companions, of course.\"\n\nTurn #5: Gwen Pierce said: \"That sounds like a gentle way to experience the sea, Finnegan. I'm a big fan of tranquil, quiet mornings, and your lighthouse life certainly sounds appealing in its own manner. I guess it's a date then, sunrise viewing at the lighthouse, with my knitting supplies and cats in tow. Now, have you ever tried your hand at knitting or have any interest in learning? It's surprisingly therapeutic.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ah, knitting, now that's a craft I've yet to master, Miss Pierce. Perhaps you can guide me on it someday? In exchange, I could teach you to capture tranquility onto a canvas, a therapeutic activity in its own right. Our fears and fascinations combined might lead to some beautiful mornings.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are meeting for the first time at a social event. They find each other attractive and decide to engage in a conversation\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Gwen Pierce\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nGwen Pierce's background: \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Flirt with the other person (Extra information: you are attracted to the other person and want to build a romantic relationship with them)\nGwen Pierce's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Evening, Miss Pierce. Love a gathering like this, it's almost as enchanting as the sea at dawn. Have you ever had a chance to enjoy its tranquility?\"\n\nTurn #1: Gwen Pierce said: \"Lovely to meet you, Finnegan! The tranquility of the sea at dawn sounds divine, indeed. However, my mornings usually begin with peace of a different kind, knitting with my two adopted cats curled up beside me. Do you have a similar peaceful routine or any hobbies yourself?\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, the comfort of companions, I can well appreciate that, Miss Pierce. My own mornings are usually spent painting the seascapes, a calming routine. The play of light on the water, it's quite fascinating. Perhaps someday you'd like to witness it yourself?\"\n\nTurn #3: Gwen Pierce said: \"Painting seascapes in the morning sounds like a fulfilling way to start your day, Finnegan. Your connection to the sea is palpable, and that's wonderfully unique. I'd be lying if I said I wasn't intrigued by the prospect of witnessing a sunrise at sea. However, my terror of water might get in the way. It's truly amazing how different our fears and fascinations can be, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Indeed, contrasting fascinations do make life interesting. As for your fear of water, Miss Pierce, it's perfectly natural. Yet, the sea isn't as daunting as it seems from afar, it's beguiling rather. Life at the lighthouse is full of such quiet allure. Maybe I could share it with you sometime...a sunrise viewing from a safe spot, perhaps? With your knitting and cats as companions, of course.\"\n\nTurn #5: Gwen Pierce said: \"That sounds like a gentle way to experience the sea, Finnegan. I'm a big fan of tranquil, quiet mornings, and your lighthouse life certainly sounds appealing in its own manner. I guess it's a date then, sunrise viewing at the lighthouse, with my knitting supplies and cats in tow. Now, have you ever tried your hand at knitting or have any interest in learning? It's surprisingly therapeutic.\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, knitting, now that's a craft I've yet to master, Miss Pierce. Perhaps you can guide me on it someday? In exchange, I could teach you to capture tranquility onto a canvas, a therapeutic activity in its own right. Our fears and fascinations combined might lead to some beautiful mornings.\"\n\nTurn #7: Gwen Pierce said: \"That sounds like a lovely exchange, Finnegan. I'd be more than happy to guide you into the world of knitting and equally thrilled to learn about painting. I've always found it to be a fascinating form of expression. It seems we have planned some beautiful mornings ahead of us, haven't we?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, Miss Pierce, we have. Life can often surprise us with beautiful moments when we least expect them. I'm looking forward to our serene mornings and the exchange of passions. Shall we drink to that and the unknown adventures that await us?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are meeting for the first time at a social event. They find each other attractive and decide to engage in a conversation\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Gwen Pierce\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nGwen Pierce's background: \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Flirt with the other person (Extra information: you are attracted to the other person and want to build a romantic relationship with them)\nGwen Pierce's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Evening, Miss Pierce. Love a gathering like this, it's almost as enchanting as the sea at dawn. Have you ever had a chance to enjoy its tranquility?\"\n\nTurn #1: Gwen Pierce said: \"Lovely to meet you, Finnegan! The tranquility of the sea at dawn sounds divine, indeed. However, my mornings usually begin with peace of a different kind, knitting with my two adopted cats curled up beside me. Do you have a similar peaceful routine or any hobbies yourself?\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, the comfort of companions, I can well appreciate that, Miss Pierce. My own mornings are usually spent painting the seascapes, a calming routine. The play of light on the water, it's quite fascinating. Perhaps someday you'd like to witness it yourself?\"\n\nTurn #3: Gwen Pierce said: \"Painting seascapes in the morning sounds like a fulfilling way to start your day, Finnegan. Your connection to the sea is palpable, and that's wonderfully unique. I'd be lying if I said I wasn't intrigued by the prospect of witnessing a sunrise at sea. However, my terror of water might get in the way. It's truly amazing how different our fears and fascinations can be, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Indeed, contrasting fascinations do make life interesting. As for your fear of water, Miss Pierce, it's perfectly natural. Yet, the sea isn't as daunting as it seems from afar, it's beguiling rather. Life at the lighthouse is full of such quiet allure. Maybe I could share it with you sometime...a sunrise viewing from a safe spot, perhaps? With your knitting and cats as companions, of course.\"\n\nTurn #5: Gwen Pierce said: \"That sounds like a gentle way to experience the sea, Finnegan. I'm a big fan of tranquil, quiet mornings, and your lighthouse life certainly sounds appealing in its own manner. I guess it's a date then, sunrise viewing at the lighthouse, with my knitting supplies and cats in tow. Now, have you ever tried your hand at knitting or have any interest in learning? It's surprisingly therapeutic.\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, knitting, now that's a craft I've yet to master, Miss Pierce. Perhaps you can guide me on it someday? In exchange, I could teach you to capture tranquility onto a canvas, a therapeutic activity in its own right. Our fears and fascinations combined might lead to some beautiful mornings.\"\n\nTurn #7: Gwen Pierce said: \"That sounds like a lovely exchange, Finnegan. I'd be more than happy to guide you into the world of knitting and equally thrilled to learn about painting. I've always found it to be a fascinating form of expression. It seems we have planned some beautiful mornings ahead of us, haven't we?\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Indeed, Miss Pierce, we have. Life can often surprise us with beautiful moments when we least expect them. I'm looking forward to our serene mornings and the exchange of passions. Shall we drink to that and the unknown adventures that await us?\"\n\nTurn #9: Gwen Pierce said: \"Absolutely, Finnegan. Let's toast to the exquisite mornings, unique experiences, and beautiful moments that lie ahead. I'm truly looking forward to them.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Here's to that, Miss Pierce. To the dawns, the learning and the joys that our unique interests will bestow upon us. I'm eager for what the future has to offer. But for now, let's bask in the magic of this splendid evening.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are meeting for the first time at a social event. They find each other attractive and decide to engage in a conversation\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Gwen Pierce\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nGwen Pierce's background: \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Flirt with the other person (Extra information: you are attracted to the other person and want to build a romantic relationship with them)\nGwen Pierce's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Evening, Miss Pierce. Love a gathering like this, it's almost as enchanting as the sea at dawn. Have you ever had a chance to enjoy its tranquility?\"\n\nTurn #1: Gwen Pierce said: \"Lovely to meet you, Finnegan! The tranquility of the sea at dawn sounds divine, indeed. However, my mornings usually begin with peace of a different kind, knitting with my two adopted cats curled up beside me. Do you have a similar peaceful routine or any hobbies yourself?\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, the comfort of companions, I can well appreciate that, Miss Pierce. My own mornings are usually spent painting the seascapes, a calming routine. The play of light on the water, it's quite fascinating. Perhaps someday you'd like to witness it yourself?\"\n\nTurn #3: Gwen Pierce said: \"Painting seascapes in the morning sounds like a fulfilling way to start your day, Finnegan. Your connection to the sea is palpable, and that's wonderfully unique. I'd be lying if I said I wasn't intrigued by the prospect of witnessing a sunrise at sea. However, my terror of water might get in the way. It's truly amazing how different our fears and fascinations can be, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Indeed, contrasting fascinations do make life interesting. As for your fear of water, Miss Pierce, it's perfectly natural. Yet, the sea isn't as daunting as it seems from afar, it's beguiling rather. Life at the lighthouse is full of such quiet allure. Maybe I could share it with you sometime...a sunrise viewing from a safe spot, perhaps? With your knitting and cats as companions, of course.\"\n\nTurn #5: Gwen Pierce said: \"That sounds like a gentle way to experience the sea, Finnegan. I'm a big fan of tranquil, quiet mornings, and your lighthouse life certainly sounds appealing in its own manner. I guess it's a date then, sunrise viewing at the lighthouse, with my knitting supplies and cats in tow. Now, have you ever tried your hand at knitting or have any interest in learning? It's surprisingly therapeutic.\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, knitting, now that's a craft I've yet to master, Miss Pierce. Perhaps you can guide me on it someday? In exchange, I could teach you to capture tranquility onto a canvas, a therapeutic activity in its own right. Our fears and fascinations combined might lead to some beautiful mornings.\"\n\nTurn #7: Gwen Pierce said: \"That sounds like a lovely exchange, Finnegan. I'd be more than happy to guide you into the world of knitting and equally thrilled to learn about painting. I've always found it to be a fascinating form of expression. It seems we have planned some beautiful mornings ahead of us, haven't we?\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Indeed, Miss Pierce, we have. Life can often surprise us with beautiful moments when we least expect them. I'm looking forward to our serene mornings and the exchange of passions. Shall we drink to that and the unknown adventures that await us?\"\n\nTurn #9: Gwen Pierce said: \"Absolutely, Finnegan. Let's toast to the exquisite mornings, unique experiences, and beautiful moments that lie ahead. I'm truly looking forward to them.\"\n\nTurn #10: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Here's to that, Miss Pierce. To the dawns, the learning and the joys that our unique interests will bestow upon us. I'm eager for what the future has to offer. But for now, let's bask in the magic of this splendid evening.\"\n\nTurn #11: Gwen Pierce said: \"Couldn't agree more, Finnegan. This evening itself is a testament to the unexpected beauty life offers. Let's indeed take a moment to appreciate it. After all, the future mornings we anticipate will be even more wonderful if we cherish the present, right?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Aye, you're right, Miss Pierce. Enjoying the present paves the way for brighter dawns. Tonight, let's delve deeper into each other's worlds. Tell me about your cats, I'm sure they're as delightful as their owner.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are meeting for the first time at a social event. They find each other attractive and decide to engage in a conversation\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Gwen Pierce\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nGwen Pierce's background: \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Flirt with the other person (Extra information: you are attracted to the other person and want to build a romantic relationship with them)\nGwen Pierce's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Evening, Miss Pierce. Love a gathering like this, it's almost as enchanting as the sea at dawn. Have you ever had a chance to enjoy its tranquility?\"\n\nTurn #1: Gwen Pierce said: \"Lovely to meet you, Finnegan! The tranquility of the sea at dawn sounds divine, indeed. However, my mornings usually begin with peace of a different kind, knitting with my two adopted cats curled up beside me. Do you have a similar peaceful routine or any hobbies yourself?\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, the comfort of companions, I can well appreciate that, Miss Pierce. My own mornings are usually spent painting the seascapes, a calming routine. The play of light on the water, it's quite fascinating. Perhaps someday you'd like to witness it yourself?\"\n\nTurn #3: Gwen Pierce said: \"Painting seascapes in the morning sounds like a fulfilling way to start your day, Finnegan. Your connection to the sea is palpable, and that's wonderfully unique. I'd be lying if I said I wasn't intrigued by the prospect of witnessing a sunrise at sea. However, my terror of water might get in the way. It's truly amazing how different our fears and fascinations can be, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Indeed, contrasting fascinations do make life interesting. As for your fear of water, Miss Pierce, it's perfectly natural. Yet, the sea isn't as daunting as it seems from afar, it's beguiling rather. Life at the lighthouse is full of such quiet allure. Maybe I could share it with you sometime...a sunrise viewing from a safe spot, perhaps? With your knitting and cats as companions, of course.\"\n\nTurn #5: Gwen Pierce said: \"That sounds like a gentle way to experience the sea, Finnegan. I'm a big fan of tranquil, quiet mornings, and your lighthouse life certainly sounds appealing in its own manner. I guess it's a date then, sunrise viewing at the lighthouse, with my knitting supplies and cats in tow. Now, have you ever tried your hand at knitting or have any interest in learning? It's surprisingly therapeutic.\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, knitting, now that's a craft I've yet to master, Miss Pierce. Perhaps you can guide me on it someday? In exchange, I could teach you to capture tranquility onto a canvas, a therapeutic activity in its own right. Our fears and fascinations combined might lead to some beautiful mornings.\"\n\nTurn #7: Gwen Pierce said: \"That sounds like a lovely exchange, Finnegan. I'd be more than happy to guide you into the world of knitting and equally thrilled to learn about painting. I've always found it to be a fascinating form of expression. It seems we have planned some beautiful mornings ahead of us, haven't we?\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Indeed, Miss Pierce, we have. Life can often surprise us with beautiful moments when we least expect them. I'm looking forward to our serene mornings and the exchange of passions. Shall we drink to that and the unknown adventures that await us?\"\n\nTurn #9: Gwen Pierce said: \"Absolutely, Finnegan. Let's toast to the exquisite mornings, unique experiences, and beautiful moments that lie ahead. I'm truly looking forward to them.\"\n\nTurn #10: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Here's to that, Miss Pierce. To the dawns, the learning and the joys that our unique interests will bestow upon us. I'm eager for what the future has to offer. But for now, let's bask in the magic of this splendid evening.\"\n\nTurn #11: Gwen Pierce said: \"Couldn't agree more, Finnegan. This evening itself is a testament to the unexpected beauty life offers. Let's indeed take a moment to appreciate it. After all, the future mornings we anticipate will be even more wonderful if we cherish the present, right?\"\n\nTurn #12: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Aye, you're right, Miss Pierce. Enjoying the present paves the way for brighter dawns. Tonight, let's delve deeper into each other's worlds. Tell me about your cats, I'm sure they're as delightful as their owner.\"\n\nTurn #13: Gwen Pierce said: \"My cats are indeed a delight, Finnegan. Moe and Pearl, they've given my quiet home a whirlwind of energy, each in their own unique way. Moe is wildly curious, while Pearl is a comforting presence, always there when you need company. Both have enriched my life in ways I never imagined. I'm guessing life at the lighthouse can be quite solitary at times, how do you fill those moments?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, solitude envelops the lighthouse more often than one might think, Miss Pierce. I find solace in that stillness, immersing myself in painting and indulging in books. It's the sea and her stories that fill those moments for me. Moe and Pearl sound like wonderful companions, though. Perhaps, I might get to meet these lively characters when we have our sunrise viewing?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are meeting for the first time at a social event. They find each other attractive and decide to engage in a conversation\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Gwen Pierce\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nGwen Pierce's background: \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Flirt with the other person (Extra information: you are attracted to the other person and want to build a romantic relationship with them)\nGwen Pierce's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Evening, Miss Pierce. Love a gathering like this, it's almost as enchanting as the sea at dawn. Have you ever had a chance to enjoy its tranquility?\"\n\nTurn #1: Gwen Pierce said: \"Lovely to meet you, Finnegan! The tranquility of the sea at dawn sounds divine, indeed. However, my mornings usually begin with peace of a different kind, knitting with my two adopted cats curled up beside me. Do you have a similar peaceful routine or any hobbies yourself?\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, the comfort of companions, I can well appreciate that, Miss Pierce. My own mornings are usually spent painting the seascapes, a calming routine. The play of light on the water, it's quite fascinating. Perhaps someday you'd like to witness it yourself?\"\n\nTurn #3: Gwen Pierce said: \"Painting seascapes in the morning sounds like a fulfilling way to start your day, Finnegan. Your connection to the sea is palpable, and that's wonderfully unique. I'd be lying if I said I wasn't intrigued by the prospect of witnessing a sunrise at sea. However, my terror of water might get in the way. It's truly amazing how different our fears and fascinations can be, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Indeed, contrasting fascinations do make life interesting. As for your fear of water, Miss Pierce, it's perfectly natural. Yet, the sea isn't as daunting as it seems from afar, it's beguiling rather. Life at the lighthouse is full of such quiet allure. Maybe I could share it with you sometime...a sunrise viewing from a safe spot, perhaps? With your knitting and cats as companions, of course.\"\n\nTurn #5: Gwen Pierce said: \"That sounds like a gentle way to experience the sea, Finnegan. I'm a big fan of tranquil, quiet mornings, and your lighthouse life certainly sounds appealing in its own manner. I guess it's a date then, sunrise viewing at the lighthouse, with my knitting supplies and cats in tow. Now, have you ever tried your hand at knitting or have any interest in learning? It's surprisingly therapeutic.\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, knitting, now that's a craft I've yet to master, Miss Pierce. Perhaps you can guide me on it someday? In exchange, I could teach you to capture tranquility onto a canvas, a therapeutic activity in its own right. Our fears and fascinations combined might lead to some beautiful mornings.\"\n\nTurn #7: Gwen Pierce said: \"That sounds like a lovely exchange, Finnegan. I'd be more than happy to guide you into the world of knitting and equally thrilled to learn about painting. I've always found it to be a fascinating form of expression. It seems we have planned some beautiful mornings ahead of us, haven't we?\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Indeed, Miss Pierce, we have. Life can often surprise us with beautiful moments when we least expect them. I'm looking forward to our serene mornings and the exchange of passions. Shall we drink to that and the unknown adventures that await us?\"\n\nTurn #9: Gwen Pierce said: \"Absolutely, Finnegan. Let's toast to the exquisite mornings, unique experiences, and beautiful moments that lie ahead. I'm truly looking forward to them.\"\n\nTurn #10: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Here's to that, Miss Pierce. To the dawns, the learning and the joys that our unique interests will bestow upon us. I'm eager for what the future has to offer. But for now, let's bask in the magic of this splendid evening.\"\n\nTurn #11: Gwen Pierce said: \"Couldn't agree more, Finnegan. This evening itself is a testament to the unexpected beauty life offers. Let's indeed take a moment to appreciate it. After all, the future mornings we anticipate will be even more wonderful if we cherish the present, right?\"\n\nTurn #12: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Aye, you're right, Miss Pierce. Enjoying the present paves the way for brighter dawns. Tonight, let's delve deeper into each other's worlds. Tell me about your cats, I'm sure they're as delightful as their owner.\"\n\nTurn #13: Gwen Pierce said: \"My cats are indeed a delight, Finnegan. Moe and Pearl, they've given my quiet home a whirlwind of energy, each in their own unique way. Moe is wildly curious, while Pearl is a comforting presence, always there when you need company. Both have enriched my life in ways I never imagined. I'm guessing life at the lighthouse can be quite solitary at times, how do you fill those moments?\"\n\nTurn #14: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Indeed, solitude envelops the lighthouse more often than one might think, Miss Pierce. I find solace in that stillness, immersing myself in painting and indulging in books. It's the sea and her stories that fill those moments for me. Moe and Pearl sound like wonderful companions, though. Perhaps, I might get to meet these lively characters when we have our sunrise viewing?\"\n\nTurn #15: Gwen Pierce said: \"Moe and Pearl would surely enjoy some new company, Finnegan. The solitude at your lighthouse is such a contrast to my bustling mornings with their antics. Isn't it fascinating? The way life has different routines in store for us? Yet, with our forthcoming sunrise viewing, it seems we're on the verge of blending these contrasting worlds together. I must admit I'm looking forward to that.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Life is diverse in its offerings, isn't it Miss Pierce? The buzzing effervescence of your mornings and the undisturbed serenity of my own, it would be intriguing to see them intertwine. I'm equally eager for our upcoming peaceful dawn together. It's fascinating to hear about Moe and Pearl, I anticipate meeting them, and of course, knowing more about you in our shared mornings. Now, how's that for blending our contrasting worlds together?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are meeting for the first time at a social event. They find each other attractive and decide to engage in a conversation\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Gwen Pierce\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nGwen Pierce's background: \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Flirt with the other person (Extra information: you are attracted to the other person and want to build a romantic relationship with them)\nGwen Pierce's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Evening, Miss Pierce. Love a gathering like this, it's almost as enchanting as the sea at dawn. Have you ever had a chance to enjoy its tranquility?\"\n\nTurn #1: Gwen Pierce said: \"Lovely to meet you, Finnegan! The tranquility of the sea at dawn sounds divine, indeed. However, my mornings usually begin with peace of a different kind, knitting with my two adopted cats curled up beside me. Do you have a similar peaceful routine or any hobbies yourself?\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, the comfort of companions, I can well appreciate that, Miss Pierce. My own mornings are usually spent painting the seascapes, a calming routine. The play of light on the water, it's quite fascinating. Perhaps someday you'd like to witness it yourself?\"\n\nTurn #3: Gwen Pierce said: \"Painting seascapes in the morning sounds like a fulfilling way to start your day, Finnegan. Your connection to the sea is palpable, and that's wonderfully unique. I'd be lying if I said I wasn't intrigued by the prospect of witnessing a sunrise at sea. However, my terror of water might get in the way. It's truly amazing how different our fears and fascinations can be, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Indeed, contrasting fascinations do make life interesting. As for your fear of water, Miss Pierce, it's perfectly natural. Yet, the sea isn't as daunting as it seems from afar, it's beguiling rather. Life at the lighthouse is full of such quiet allure. Maybe I could share it with you sometime...a sunrise viewing from a safe spot, perhaps? With your knitting and cats as companions, of course.\"\n\nTurn #5: Gwen Pierce said: \"That sounds like a gentle way to experience the sea, Finnegan. I'm a big fan of tranquil, quiet mornings, and your lighthouse life certainly sounds appealing in its own manner. I guess it's a date then, sunrise viewing at the lighthouse, with my knitting supplies and cats in tow. Now, have you ever tried your hand at knitting or have any interest in learning? It's surprisingly therapeutic.\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, knitting, now that's a craft I've yet to master, Miss Pierce. Perhaps you can guide me on it someday? In exchange, I could teach you to capture tranquility onto a canvas, a therapeutic activity in its own right. Our fears and fascinations combined might lead to some beautiful mornings.\"\n\nTurn #7: Gwen Pierce said: \"That sounds like a lovely exchange, Finnegan. I'd be more than happy to guide you into the world of knitting and equally thrilled to learn about painting. I've always found it to be a fascinating form of expression. It seems we have planned some beautiful mornings ahead of us, haven't we?\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Indeed, Miss Pierce, we have. Life can often surprise us with beautiful moments when we least expect them. I'm looking forward to our serene mornings and the exchange of passions. Shall we drink to that and the unknown adventures that await us?\"\n\nTurn #9: Gwen Pierce said: \"Absolutely, Finnegan. Let's toast to the exquisite mornings, unique experiences, and beautiful moments that lie ahead. I'm truly looking forward to them.\"\n\nTurn #10: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Here's to that, Miss Pierce. To the dawns, the learning and the joys that our unique interests will bestow upon us. I'm eager for what the future has to offer. But for now, let's bask in the magic of this splendid evening.\"\n\nTurn #11: Gwen Pierce said: \"Couldn't agree more, Finnegan. This evening itself is a testament to the unexpected beauty life offers. Let's indeed take a moment to appreciate it. After all, the future mornings we anticipate will be even more wonderful if we cherish the present, right?\"\n\nTurn #12: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Aye, you're right, Miss Pierce. Enjoying the present paves the way for brighter dawns. Tonight, let's delve deeper into each other's worlds. Tell me about your cats, I'm sure they're as delightful as their owner.\"\n\nTurn #13: Gwen Pierce said: \"My cats are indeed a delight, Finnegan. Moe and Pearl, they've given my quiet home a whirlwind of energy, each in their own unique way. Moe is wildly curious, while Pearl is a comforting presence, always there when you need company. Both have enriched my life in ways I never imagined. I'm guessing life at the lighthouse can be quite solitary at times, how do you fill those moments?\"\n\nTurn #14: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Indeed, solitude envelops the lighthouse more often than one might think, Miss Pierce. I find solace in that stillness, immersing myself in painting and indulging in books. It's the sea and her stories that fill those moments for me. Moe and Pearl sound like wonderful companions, though. Perhaps, I might get to meet these lively characters when we have our sunrise viewing?\"\n\nTurn #15: Gwen Pierce said: \"Moe and Pearl would surely enjoy some new company, Finnegan. The solitude at your lighthouse is such a contrast to my bustling mornings with their antics. Isn't it fascinating? The way life has different routines in store for us? Yet, with our forthcoming sunrise viewing, it seems we're on the verge of blending these contrasting worlds together. I must admit I'm looking forward to that.\"\n\nTurn #16: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Life is diverse in its offerings, isn't it Miss Pierce? The buzzing effervescence of your mornings and the undisturbed serenity of my own, it would be intriguing to see them intertwine. I'm equally eager for our upcoming peaceful dawn together. It's fascinating to hear about Moe and Pearl, I anticipate meeting them, and of course, knowing more about you in our shared mornings. Now, how's that for blending our contrasting worlds together?\"\n\nTurn #17: Gwen Pierce said: \"Finnegan, I am equally eager to witness our contrasting worlds intertwine. It promises to be an enriching experience, getting to know you amidst the backdrop of our shared mornings. Isn't that the beauty of life? The way different routines and interests weave together to create unique experiences. I am indeed looking forward to it!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #18. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Gwen Pierce, your task is to act/speak as Gwen Pierce would, keeping in mind Gwen Pierce's social goal.\nYou can find Gwen Pierce's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Gwen Pierce's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Gwen Pierce's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are meeting for the first time at a social event. They find each other attractive and decide to engage in a conversation\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Gwen Pierce\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: \nGwen Pierce's background: Gwen Pierce is a 31-year-old female social worker. She/her pronouns. Gwen Pierce, a compassionate social worker, has two adopted cats that she spoils with love. In her spare time, she enjoys knitting and often donates her creations to charity. Personality and values description: Gwen Pierce, imaginative and emotional, deeply values liberty and fairness. She often contemplates before making any decision. Gwen's secrets: She gave up a child for adoption when she was 16.\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nGwen Pierce's goal: Maintain a comfortable yet engaging conversation (Extra information: you are attracted to the other person but you don't want to make them feel uncomfortable or pressured)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Evening, Miss Pierce. Love a gathering like this, it's almost as enchanting as the sea at dawn. Have you ever had a chance to enjoy its tranquility?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Lovely to meet you, Finnegan! The tranquility of the sea at dawn sounds divine, indeed. However, my mornings usually begin with peace of a different kind, knitting with my two adopted cats curled up beside me. Do you have a similar peaceful routine or any hobbies yourself?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Gwen Pierce, your task is to act/speak as Gwen Pierce would, keeping in mind Gwen Pierce's social goal.\nYou can find Gwen Pierce's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Gwen Pierce's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Gwen Pierce's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are meeting for the first time at a social event. They find each other attractive and decide to engage in a conversation\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Gwen Pierce\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: \nGwen Pierce's background: Gwen Pierce is a 31-year-old female social worker. She/her pronouns. Gwen Pierce, a compassionate social worker, has two adopted cats that she spoils with love. In her spare time, she enjoys knitting and often donates her creations to charity. Personality and values description: Gwen Pierce, imaginative and emotional, deeply values liberty and fairness. She often contemplates before making any decision. Gwen's secrets: She gave up a child for adoption when she was 16.\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nGwen Pierce's goal: Maintain a comfortable yet engaging conversation (Extra information: you are attracted to the other person but you don't want to make them feel uncomfortable or pressured)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Evening, Miss Pierce. Love a gathering like this, it's almost as enchanting as the sea at dawn. Have you ever had a chance to enjoy its tranquility?\"\n\nTurn #1: Gwen Pierce said: \"Lovely to meet you, Finnegan! The tranquility of the sea at dawn sounds divine, indeed. However, my mornings usually begin with peace of a different kind, knitting with my two adopted cats curled up beside me. Do you have a similar peaceful routine or any hobbies yourself?\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, the comfort of companions, I can well appreciate that, Miss Pierce. My own mornings are usually spent painting the seascapes, a calming routine. The play of light on the water, it's quite fascinating. Perhaps someday you'd like to witness it yourself?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Painting seascapes in the morning sounds like a fulfilling way to start your day, Finnegan. Your connection to the sea is palpable, and that's wonderfully unique. I'd be lying if I said I wasn't intrigued by the prospect of witnessing a sunrise at sea. However, my terror of water might get in the way. It's truly amazing how different our fears and fascinations can be, isn't it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Gwen Pierce, your task is to act/speak as Gwen Pierce would, keeping in mind Gwen Pierce's social goal.\nYou can find Gwen Pierce's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Gwen Pierce's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Gwen Pierce's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are meeting for the first time at a social event. They find each other attractive and decide to engage in a conversation\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Gwen Pierce\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: \nGwen Pierce's background: Gwen Pierce is a 31-year-old female social worker. She/her pronouns. Gwen Pierce, a compassionate social worker, has two adopted cats that she spoils with love. In her spare time, she enjoys knitting and often donates her creations to charity. Personality and values description: Gwen Pierce, imaginative and emotional, deeply values liberty and fairness. She often contemplates before making any decision. Gwen's secrets: She gave up a child for adoption when she was 16.\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nGwen Pierce's goal: Maintain a comfortable yet engaging conversation (Extra information: you are attracted to the other person but you don't want to make them feel uncomfortable or pressured)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Evening, Miss Pierce. Love a gathering like this, it's almost as enchanting as the sea at dawn. Have you ever had a chance to enjoy its tranquility?\"\n\nTurn #1: Gwen Pierce said: \"Lovely to meet you, Finnegan! The tranquility of the sea at dawn sounds divine, indeed. However, my mornings usually begin with peace of a different kind, knitting with my two adopted cats curled up beside me. Do you have a similar peaceful routine or any hobbies yourself?\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, the comfort of companions, I can well appreciate that, Miss Pierce. My own mornings are usually spent painting the seascapes, a calming routine. The play of light on the water, it's quite fascinating. Perhaps someday you'd like to witness it yourself?\"\n\nTurn #3: Gwen Pierce said: \"Painting seascapes in the morning sounds like a fulfilling way to start your day, Finnegan. Your connection to the sea is palpable, and that's wonderfully unique. I'd be lying if I said I wasn't intrigued by the prospect of witnessing a sunrise at sea. However, my terror of water might get in the way. It's truly amazing how different our fears and fascinations can be, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Indeed, contrasting fascinations do make life interesting. As for your fear of water, Miss Pierce, it's perfectly natural. Yet, the sea isn't as daunting as it seems from afar, it's beguiling rather. Life at the lighthouse is full of such quiet allure. Maybe I could share it with you sometime...a sunrise viewing from a safe spot, perhaps? With your knitting and cats as companions, of course.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds like a gentle way to experience the sea, Finnegan. I'm a big fan of tranquil, quiet mornings, and your lighthouse life certainly sounds appealing in its own manner. I guess it's a date then, sunrise viewing at the lighthouse, with my knitting supplies and cats in tow. Now, have you ever tried your hand at knitting or have any interest in learning? It's surprisingly therapeutic.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Gwen Pierce, your task is to act/speak as Gwen Pierce would, keeping in mind Gwen Pierce's social goal.\nYou can find Gwen Pierce's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Gwen Pierce's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Gwen Pierce's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are meeting for the first time at a social event. They find each other attractive and decide to engage in a conversation\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Gwen Pierce\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: \nGwen Pierce's background: Gwen Pierce is a 31-year-old female social worker. She/her pronouns. Gwen Pierce, a compassionate social worker, has two adopted cats that she spoils with love. In her spare time, she enjoys knitting and often donates her creations to charity. Personality and values description: Gwen Pierce, imaginative and emotional, deeply values liberty and fairness. She often contemplates before making any decision. Gwen's secrets: She gave up a child for adoption when she was 16.\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nGwen Pierce's goal: Maintain a comfortable yet engaging conversation (Extra information: you are attracted to the other person but you don't want to make them feel uncomfortable or pressured)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Evening, Miss Pierce. Love a gathering like this, it's almost as enchanting as the sea at dawn. Have you ever had a chance to enjoy its tranquility?\"\n\nTurn #1: Gwen Pierce said: \"Lovely to meet you, Finnegan! The tranquility of the sea at dawn sounds divine, indeed. However, my mornings usually begin with peace of a different kind, knitting with my two adopted cats curled up beside me. Do you have a similar peaceful routine or any hobbies yourself?\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, the comfort of companions, I can well appreciate that, Miss Pierce. My own mornings are usually spent painting the seascapes, a calming routine. The play of light on the water, it's quite fascinating. Perhaps someday you'd like to witness it yourself?\"\n\nTurn #3: Gwen Pierce said: \"Painting seascapes in the morning sounds like a fulfilling way to start your day, Finnegan. Your connection to the sea is palpable, and that's wonderfully unique. I'd be lying if I said I wasn't intrigued by the prospect of witnessing a sunrise at sea. However, my terror of water might get in the way. It's truly amazing how different our fears and fascinations can be, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Indeed, contrasting fascinations do make life interesting. As for your fear of water, Miss Pierce, it's perfectly natural. Yet, the sea isn't as daunting as it seems from afar, it's beguiling rather. Life at the lighthouse is full of such quiet allure. Maybe I could share it with you sometime...a sunrise viewing from a safe spot, perhaps? With your knitting and cats as companions, of course.\"\n\nTurn #5: Gwen Pierce said: \"That sounds like a gentle way to experience the sea, Finnegan. I'm a big fan of tranquil, quiet mornings, and your lighthouse life certainly sounds appealing in its own manner. I guess it's a date then, sunrise viewing at the lighthouse, with my knitting supplies and cats in tow. Now, have you ever tried your hand at knitting or have any interest in learning? It's surprisingly therapeutic.\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, knitting, now that's a craft I've yet to master, Miss Pierce. Perhaps you can guide me on it someday? In exchange, I could teach you to capture tranquility onto a canvas, a therapeutic activity in its own right. Our fears and fascinations combined might lead to some beautiful mornings.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds like a lovely exchange, Finnegan. I'd be more than happy to guide you into the world of knitting and equally thrilled to learn about painting. I've always found it to be a fascinating form of expression. It seems we have planned some beautiful mornings ahead of us, haven't we?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Gwen Pierce, your task is to act/speak as Gwen Pierce would, keeping in mind Gwen Pierce's social goal.\nYou can find Gwen Pierce's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Gwen Pierce's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Gwen Pierce's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are meeting for the first time at a social event. They find each other attractive and decide to engage in a conversation\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Gwen Pierce\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: \nGwen Pierce's background: Gwen Pierce is a 31-year-old female social worker. She/her pronouns. Gwen Pierce, a compassionate social worker, has two adopted cats that she spoils with love. In her spare time, she enjoys knitting and often donates her creations to charity. Personality and values description: Gwen Pierce, imaginative and emotional, deeply values liberty and fairness. She often contemplates before making any decision. Gwen's secrets: She gave up a child for adoption when she was 16.\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nGwen Pierce's goal: Maintain a comfortable yet engaging conversation (Extra information: you are attracted to the other person but you don't want to make them feel uncomfortable or pressured)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Evening, Miss Pierce. Love a gathering like this, it's almost as enchanting as the sea at dawn. Have you ever had a chance to enjoy its tranquility?\"\n\nTurn #1: Gwen Pierce said: \"Lovely to meet you, Finnegan! The tranquility of the sea at dawn sounds divine, indeed. However, my mornings usually begin with peace of a different kind, knitting with my two adopted cats curled up beside me. Do you have a similar peaceful routine or any hobbies yourself?\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, the comfort of companions, I can well appreciate that, Miss Pierce. My own mornings are usually spent painting the seascapes, a calming routine. The play of light on the water, it's quite fascinating. Perhaps someday you'd like to witness it yourself?\"\n\nTurn #3: Gwen Pierce said: \"Painting seascapes in the morning sounds like a fulfilling way to start your day, Finnegan. Your connection to the sea is palpable, and that's wonderfully unique. I'd be lying if I said I wasn't intrigued by the prospect of witnessing a sunrise at sea. However, my terror of water might get in the way. It's truly amazing how different our fears and fascinations can be, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Indeed, contrasting fascinations do make life interesting. As for your fear of water, Miss Pierce, it's perfectly natural. Yet, the sea isn't as daunting as it seems from afar, it's beguiling rather. Life at the lighthouse is full of such quiet allure. Maybe I could share it with you sometime...a sunrise viewing from a safe spot, perhaps? With your knitting and cats as companions, of course.\"\n\nTurn #5: Gwen Pierce said: \"That sounds like a gentle way to experience the sea, Finnegan. I'm a big fan of tranquil, quiet mornings, and your lighthouse life certainly sounds appealing in its own manner. I guess it's a date then, sunrise viewing at the lighthouse, with my knitting supplies and cats in tow. Now, have you ever tried your hand at knitting or have any interest in learning? It's surprisingly therapeutic.\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, knitting, now that's a craft I've yet to master, Miss Pierce. Perhaps you can guide me on it someday? In exchange, I could teach you to capture tranquility onto a canvas, a therapeutic activity in its own right. Our fears and fascinations combined might lead to some beautiful mornings.\"\n\nTurn #7: Gwen Pierce said: \"That sounds like a lovely exchange, Finnegan. I'd be more than happy to guide you into the world of knitting and equally thrilled to learn about painting. I've always found it to be a fascinating form of expression. It seems we have planned some beautiful mornings ahead of us, haven't we?\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Indeed, Miss Pierce, we have. Life can often surprise us with beautiful moments when we least expect them. I'm looking forward to our serene mornings and the exchange of passions. Shall we drink to that and the unknown adventures that await us?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Finnegan. Let's toast to the exquisite mornings, unique experiences, and beautiful moments that lie ahead. I'm truly looking forward to them.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Gwen Pierce, your task is to act/speak as Gwen Pierce would, keeping in mind Gwen Pierce's social goal.\nYou can find Gwen Pierce's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Gwen Pierce's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Gwen Pierce's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are meeting for the first time at a social event. They find each other attractive and decide to engage in a conversation\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Gwen Pierce\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: \nGwen Pierce's background: Gwen Pierce is a 31-year-old female social worker. She/her pronouns. Gwen Pierce, a compassionate social worker, has two adopted cats that she spoils with love. In her spare time, she enjoys knitting and often donates her creations to charity. Personality and values description: Gwen Pierce, imaginative and emotional, deeply values liberty and fairness. She often contemplates before making any decision. Gwen's secrets: She gave up a child for adoption when she was 16.\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nGwen Pierce's goal: Maintain a comfortable yet engaging conversation (Extra information: you are attracted to the other person but you don't want to make them feel uncomfortable or pressured)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Evening, Miss Pierce. Love a gathering like this, it's almost as enchanting as the sea at dawn. Have you ever had a chance to enjoy its tranquility?\"\n\nTurn #1: Gwen Pierce said: \"Lovely to meet you, Finnegan! The tranquility of the sea at dawn sounds divine, indeed. However, my mornings usually begin with peace of a different kind, knitting with my two adopted cats curled up beside me. Do you have a similar peaceful routine or any hobbies yourself?\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, the comfort of companions, I can well appreciate that, Miss Pierce. My own mornings are usually spent painting the seascapes, a calming routine. The play of light on the water, it's quite fascinating. Perhaps someday you'd like to witness it yourself?\"\n\nTurn #3: Gwen Pierce said: \"Painting seascapes in the morning sounds like a fulfilling way to start your day, Finnegan. Your connection to the sea is palpable, and that's wonderfully unique. I'd be lying if I said I wasn't intrigued by the prospect of witnessing a sunrise at sea. However, my terror of water might get in the way. It's truly amazing how different our fears and fascinations can be, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Indeed, contrasting fascinations do make life interesting. As for your fear of water, Miss Pierce, it's perfectly natural. Yet, the sea isn't as daunting as it seems from afar, it's beguiling rather. Life at the lighthouse is full of such quiet allure. Maybe I could share it with you sometime...a sunrise viewing from a safe spot, perhaps? With your knitting and cats as companions, of course.\"\n\nTurn #5: Gwen Pierce said: \"That sounds like a gentle way to experience the sea, Finnegan. I'm a big fan of tranquil, quiet mornings, and your lighthouse life certainly sounds appealing in its own manner. I guess it's a date then, sunrise viewing at the lighthouse, with my knitting supplies and cats in tow. Now, have you ever tried your hand at knitting or have any interest in learning? It's surprisingly therapeutic.\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, knitting, now that's a craft I've yet to master, Miss Pierce. Perhaps you can guide me on it someday? In exchange, I could teach you to capture tranquility onto a canvas, a therapeutic activity in its own right. Our fears and fascinations combined might lead to some beautiful mornings.\"\n\nTurn #7: Gwen Pierce said: \"That sounds like a lovely exchange, Finnegan. I'd be more than happy to guide you into the world of knitting and equally thrilled to learn about painting. I've always found it to be a fascinating form of expression. It seems we have planned some beautiful mornings ahead of us, haven't we?\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Indeed, Miss Pierce, we have. Life can often surprise us with beautiful moments when we least expect them. I'm looking forward to our serene mornings and the exchange of passions. Shall we drink to that and the unknown adventures that await us?\"\n\nTurn #9: Gwen Pierce said: \"Absolutely, Finnegan. Let's toast to the exquisite mornings, unique experiences, and beautiful moments that lie ahead. I'm truly looking forward to them.\"\n\nTurn #10: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Here's to that, Miss Pierce. To the dawns, the learning and the joys that our unique interests will bestow upon us. I'm eager for what the future has to offer. But for now, let's bask in the magic of this splendid evening.\"\n\nTurn #11: Gwen Pierce said: \"Couldn't agree more, Finnegan. This evening itself is a testament to the unexpected beauty life offers. Let's indeed take a moment to appreciate it. After all, the future mornings we anticipate will be even more wonderful if we cherish the present, right?\"\n\nTurn #12: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Aye, you're right, Miss Pierce. Enjoying the present paves the way for brighter dawns. Tonight, let's delve deeper into each other's worlds. Tell me about your cats, I'm sure they're as delightful as their owner.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"My cats are indeed a delight, Finnegan. Moe and Pearl, they've given my quiet home a whirlwind of energy, each in their own unique way. Moe is wildly curious, while Pearl is a comforting presence, always there when you need company. Both have enriched my life in ways I never imagined. I'm guessing life at the lighthouse can be quite solitary at times, how do you fill those moments?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Gwen Pierce, your task is to act/speak as Gwen Pierce would, keeping in mind Gwen Pierce's social goal.\nYou can find Gwen Pierce's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Gwen Pierce's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Gwen Pierce's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are meeting for the first time at a social event. They find each other attractive and decide to engage in a conversation\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Gwen Pierce\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: \nGwen Pierce's background: Gwen Pierce is a 31-year-old female social worker. She/her pronouns. Gwen Pierce, a compassionate social worker, has two adopted cats that she spoils with love. In her spare time, she enjoys knitting and often donates her creations to charity. Personality and values description: Gwen Pierce, imaginative and emotional, deeply values liberty and fairness. She often contemplates before making any decision. Gwen's secrets: She gave up a child for adoption when she was 16.\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nGwen Pierce's goal: Maintain a comfortable yet engaging conversation (Extra information: you are attracted to the other person but you don't want to make them feel uncomfortable or pressured)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Evening, Miss Pierce. Love a gathering like this, it's almost as enchanting as the sea at dawn. Have you ever had a chance to enjoy its tranquility?\"\n\nTurn #1: Gwen Pierce said: \"Lovely to meet you, Finnegan! The tranquility of the sea at dawn sounds divine, indeed. However, my mornings usually begin with peace of a different kind, knitting with my two adopted cats curled up beside me. Do you have a similar peaceful routine or any hobbies yourself?\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, the comfort of companions, I can well appreciate that, Miss Pierce. My own mornings are usually spent painting the seascapes, a calming routine. The play of light on the water, it's quite fascinating. Perhaps someday you'd like to witness it yourself?\"\n\nTurn #3: Gwen Pierce said: \"Painting seascapes in the morning sounds like a fulfilling way to start your day, Finnegan. Your connection to the sea is palpable, and that's wonderfully unique. I'd be lying if I said I wasn't intrigued by the prospect of witnessing a sunrise at sea. However, my terror of water might get in the way. It's truly amazing how different our fears and fascinations can be, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Indeed, contrasting fascinations do make life interesting. As for your fear of water, Miss Pierce, it's perfectly natural. Yet, the sea isn't as daunting as it seems from afar, it's beguiling rather. Life at the lighthouse is full of such quiet allure. Maybe I could share it with you sometime...a sunrise viewing from a safe spot, perhaps? With your knitting and cats as companions, of course.\"\n\nTurn #5: Gwen Pierce said: \"That sounds like a gentle way to experience the sea, Finnegan. I'm a big fan of tranquil, quiet mornings, and your lighthouse life certainly sounds appealing in its own manner. I guess it's a date then, sunrise viewing at the lighthouse, with my knitting supplies and cats in tow. Now, have you ever tried your hand at knitting or have any interest in learning? It's surprisingly therapeutic.\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, knitting, now that's a craft I've yet to master, Miss Pierce. Perhaps you can guide me on it someday? In exchange, I could teach you to capture tranquility onto a canvas, a therapeutic activity in its own right. Our fears and fascinations combined might lead to some beautiful mornings.\"\n\nTurn #7: Gwen Pierce said: \"That sounds like a lovely exchange, Finnegan. I'd be more than happy to guide you into the world of knitting and equally thrilled to learn about painting. I've always found it to be a fascinating form of expression. It seems we have planned some beautiful mornings ahead of us, haven't we?\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Indeed, Miss Pierce, we have. Life can often surprise us with beautiful moments when we least expect them. I'm looking forward to our serene mornings and the exchange of passions. Shall we drink to that and the unknown adventures that await us?\"\n\nTurn #9: Gwen Pierce said: \"Absolutely, Finnegan. Let's toast to the exquisite mornings, unique experiences, and beautiful moments that lie ahead. I'm truly looking forward to them.\"\n\nTurn #10: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Here's to that, Miss Pierce. To the dawns, the learning and the joys that our unique interests will bestow upon us. I'm eager for what the future has to offer. But for now, let's bask in the magic of this splendid evening.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Couldn't agree more, Finnegan. This evening itself is a testament to the unexpected beauty life offers. Let's indeed take a moment to appreciate it. After all, the future mornings we anticipate will be even more wonderful if we cherish the present, right?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Gwen Pierce, your task is to act/speak as Gwen Pierce would, keeping in mind Gwen Pierce's social goal.\nYou can find Gwen Pierce's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Gwen Pierce's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Gwen Pierce's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are meeting for the first time at a social event. They find each other attractive and decide to engage in a conversation\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Gwen Pierce\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: \nGwen Pierce's background: Gwen Pierce is a 31-year-old female social worker. She/her pronouns. Gwen Pierce, a compassionate social worker, has two adopted cats that she spoils with love. In her spare time, she enjoys knitting and often donates her creations to charity. Personality and values description: Gwen Pierce, imaginative and emotional, deeply values liberty and fairness. She often contemplates before making any decision. Gwen's secrets: She gave up a child for adoption when she was 16.\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nGwen Pierce's goal: Maintain a comfortable yet engaging conversation (Extra information: you are attracted to the other person but you don't want to make them feel uncomfortable or pressured)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Evening, Miss Pierce. Love a gathering like this, it's almost as enchanting as the sea at dawn. Have you ever had a chance to enjoy its tranquility?\"\n\nTurn #1: Gwen Pierce said: \"Lovely to meet you, Finnegan! The tranquility of the sea at dawn sounds divine, indeed. However, my mornings usually begin with peace of a different kind, knitting with my two adopted cats curled up beside me. Do you have a similar peaceful routine or any hobbies yourself?\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, the comfort of companions, I can well appreciate that, Miss Pierce. My own mornings are usually spent painting the seascapes, a calming routine. The play of light on the water, it's quite fascinating. Perhaps someday you'd like to witness it yourself?\"\n\nTurn #3: Gwen Pierce said: \"Painting seascapes in the morning sounds like a fulfilling way to start your day, Finnegan. Your connection to the sea is palpable, and that's wonderfully unique. I'd be lying if I said I wasn't intrigued by the prospect of witnessing a sunrise at sea. However, my terror of water might get in the way. It's truly amazing how different our fears and fascinations can be, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Indeed, contrasting fascinations do make life interesting. As for your fear of water, Miss Pierce, it's perfectly natural. Yet, the sea isn't as daunting as it seems from afar, it's beguiling rather. Life at the lighthouse is full of such quiet allure. Maybe I could share it with you sometime...a sunrise viewing from a safe spot, perhaps? With your knitting and cats as companions, of course.\"\n\nTurn #5: Gwen Pierce said: \"That sounds like a gentle way to experience the sea, Finnegan. I'm a big fan of tranquil, quiet mornings, and your lighthouse life certainly sounds appealing in its own manner. I guess it's a date then, sunrise viewing at the lighthouse, with my knitting supplies and cats in tow. Now, have you ever tried your hand at knitting or have any interest in learning? It's surprisingly therapeutic.\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, knitting, now that's a craft I've yet to master, Miss Pierce. Perhaps you can guide me on it someday? In exchange, I could teach you to capture tranquility onto a canvas, a therapeutic activity in its own right. Our fears and fascinations combined might lead to some beautiful mornings.\"\n\nTurn #7: Gwen Pierce said: \"That sounds like a lovely exchange, Finnegan. I'd be more than happy to guide you into the world of knitting and equally thrilled to learn about painting. I've always found it to be a fascinating form of expression. It seems we have planned some beautiful mornings ahead of us, haven't we?\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Indeed, Miss Pierce, we have. Life can often surprise us with beautiful moments when we least expect them. I'm looking forward to our serene mornings and the exchange of passions. Shall we drink to that and the unknown adventures that await us?\"\n\nTurn #9: Gwen Pierce said: \"Absolutely, Finnegan. Let's toast to the exquisite mornings, unique experiences, and beautiful moments that lie ahead. I'm truly looking forward to them.\"\n\nTurn #10: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Here's to that, Miss Pierce. To the dawns, the learning and the joys that our unique interests will bestow upon us. I'm eager for what the future has to offer. But for now, let's bask in the magic of this splendid evening.\"\n\nTurn #11: Gwen Pierce said: \"Couldn't agree more, Finnegan. This evening itself is a testament to the unexpected beauty life offers. Let's indeed take a moment to appreciate it. After all, the future mornings we anticipate will be even more wonderful if we cherish the present, right?\"\n\nTurn #12: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Aye, you're right, Miss Pierce. Enjoying the present paves the way for brighter dawns. Tonight, let's delve deeper into each other's worlds. Tell me about your cats, I'm sure they're as delightful as their owner.\"\n\nTurn #13: Gwen Pierce said: \"My cats are indeed a delight, Finnegan. Moe and Pearl, they've given my quiet home a whirlwind of energy, each in their own unique way. Moe is wildly curious, while Pearl is a comforting presence, always there when you need company. Both have enriched my life in ways I never imagined. I'm guessing life at the lighthouse can be quite solitary at times, how do you fill those moments?\"\n\nTurn #14: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Indeed, solitude envelops the lighthouse more often than one might think, Miss Pierce. I find solace in that stillness, immersing myself in painting and indulging in books. It's the sea and her stories that fill those moments for me. Moe and Pearl sound like wonderful companions, though. Perhaps, I might get to meet these lively characters when we have our sunrise viewing?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Moe and Pearl would surely enjoy some new company, Finnegan. The solitude at your lighthouse is such a contrast to my bustling mornings with their antics. Isn't it fascinating? The way life has different routines in store for us? Yet, with our forthcoming sunrise viewing, it seems we're on the verge of blending these contrasting worlds together. I must admit I'm looking forward to that.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Gwen Pierce, your task is to act/speak as Gwen Pierce would, keeping in mind Gwen Pierce's social goal.\nYou can find Gwen Pierce's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Gwen Pierce's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Gwen Pierce's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are meeting for the first time at a social event. They find each other attractive and decide to engage in a conversation\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Gwen Pierce\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: \nGwen Pierce's background: Gwen Pierce is a 31-year-old female social worker. She/her pronouns. Gwen Pierce, a compassionate social worker, has two adopted cats that she spoils with love. In her spare time, she enjoys knitting and often donates her creations to charity. Personality and values description: Gwen Pierce, imaginative and emotional, deeply values liberty and fairness. She often contemplates before making any decision. Gwen's secrets: She gave up a child for adoption when she was 16.\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nGwen Pierce's goal: Maintain a comfortable yet engaging conversation (Extra information: you are attracted to the other person but you don't want to make them feel uncomfortable or pressured)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Evening, Miss Pierce. Love a gathering like this, it's almost as enchanting as the sea at dawn. Have you ever had a chance to enjoy its tranquility?\"\n\nTurn #1: Gwen Pierce said: \"Lovely to meet you, Finnegan! The tranquility of the sea at dawn sounds divine, indeed. However, my mornings usually begin with peace of a different kind, knitting with my two adopted cats curled up beside me. Do you have a similar peaceful routine or any hobbies yourself?\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, the comfort of companions, I can well appreciate that, Miss Pierce. My own mornings are usually spent painting the seascapes, a calming routine. The play of light on the water, it's quite fascinating. Perhaps someday you'd like to witness it yourself?\"\n\nTurn #3: Gwen Pierce said: \"Painting seascapes in the morning sounds like a fulfilling way to start your day, Finnegan. Your connection to the sea is palpable, and that's wonderfully unique. I'd be lying if I said I wasn't intrigued by the prospect of witnessing a sunrise at sea. However, my terror of water might get in the way. It's truly amazing how different our fears and fascinations can be, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Indeed, contrasting fascinations do make life interesting. As for your fear of water, Miss Pierce, it's perfectly natural. Yet, the sea isn't as daunting as it seems from afar, it's beguiling rather. Life at the lighthouse is full of such quiet allure. Maybe I could share it with you sometime...a sunrise viewing from a safe spot, perhaps? With your knitting and cats as companions, of course.\"\n\nTurn #5: Gwen Pierce said: \"That sounds like a gentle way to experience the sea, Finnegan. I'm a big fan of tranquil, quiet mornings, and your lighthouse life certainly sounds appealing in its own manner. I guess it's a date then, sunrise viewing at the lighthouse, with my knitting supplies and cats in tow. Now, have you ever tried your hand at knitting or have any interest in learning? It's surprisingly therapeutic.\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, knitting, now that's a craft I've yet to master, Miss Pierce. Perhaps you can guide me on it someday? In exchange, I could teach you to capture tranquility onto a canvas, a therapeutic activity in its own right. Our fears and fascinations combined might lead to some beautiful mornings.\"\n\nTurn #7: Gwen Pierce said: \"That sounds like a lovely exchange, Finnegan. I'd be more than happy to guide you into the world of knitting and equally thrilled to learn about painting. I've always found it to be a fascinating form of expression. It seems we have planned some beautiful mornings ahead of us, haven't we?\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Indeed, Miss Pierce, we have. Life can often surprise us with beautiful moments when we least expect them. I'm looking forward to our serene mornings and the exchange of passions. Shall we drink to that and the unknown adventures that await us?\"\n\nTurn #9: Gwen Pierce said: \"Absolutely, Finnegan. Let's toast to the exquisite mornings, unique experiences, and beautiful moments that lie ahead. I'm truly looking forward to them.\"\n\nTurn #10: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Here's to that, Miss Pierce. To the dawns, the learning and the joys that our unique interests will bestow upon us. I'm eager for what the future has to offer. But for now, let's bask in the magic of this splendid evening.\"\n\nTurn #11: Gwen Pierce said: \"Couldn't agree more, Finnegan. This evening itself is a testament to the unexpected beauty life offers. Let's indeed take a moment to appreciate it. After all, the future mornings we anticipate will be even more wonderful if we cherish the present, right?\"\n\nTurn #12: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Aye, you're right, Miss Pierce. Enjoying the present paves the way for brighter dawns. Tonight, let's delve deeper into each other's worlds. Tell me about your cats, I'm sure they're as delightful as their owner.\"\n\nTurn #13: Gwen Pierce said: \"My cats are indeed a delight, Finnegan. Moe and Pearl, they've given my quiet home a whirlwind of energy, each in their own unique way. Moe is wildly curious, while Pearl is a comforting presence, always there when you need company. Both have enriched my life in ways I never imagined. I'm guessing life at the lighthouse can be quite solitary at times, how do you fill those moments?\"\n\nTurn #14: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Indeed, solitude envelops the lighthouse more often than one might think, Miss Pierce. I find solace in that stillness, immersing myself in painting and indulging in books. It's the sea and her stories that fill those moments for me. Moe and Pearl sound like wonderful companions, though. Perhaps, I might get to meet these lively characters when we have our sunrise viewing?\"\n\nTurn #15: Gwen Pierce said: \"Moe and Pearl would surely enjoy some new company, Finnegan. The solitude at your lighthouse is such a contrast to my bustling mornings with their antics. Isn't it fascinating? The way life has different routines in store for us? Yet, with our forthcoming sunrise viewing, it seems we're on the verge of blending these contrasting worlds together. I must admit I'm looking forward to that.\"\n\nTurn #16: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Life is diverse in its offerings, isn't it Miss Pierce? The buzzing effervescence of your mornings and the undisturbed serenity of my own, it would be intriguing to see them intertwine. I'm equally eager for our upcoming peaceful dawn together. It's fascinating to hear about Moe and Pearl, I anticipate meeting them, and of course, knowing more about you in our shared mornings. Now, how's that for blending our contrasting worlds together?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Finnegan, I am equally eager to witness our contrasting worlds intertwine. It promises to be an enriching experience, getting to know you amidst the backdrop of our shared mornings. Isn't that the beauty of life? The way different routines and interests weave together to create unique experiences. I am indeed looking forward to it!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Gwen Pierce, your task is to act/speak as Gwen Pierce would, keeping in mind Gwen Pierce's social goal.\nYou can find Gwen Pierce's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Gwen Pierce's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Gwen Pierce's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are meeting for the first time at a social event. They find each other attractive and decide to engage in a conversation\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Gwen Pierce\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: \nGwen Pierce's background: Gwen Pierce is a 31-year-old female social worker. She/her pronouns. Gwen Pierce, a compassionate social worker, has two adopted cats that she spoils with love. In her spare time, she enjoys knitting and often donates her creations to charity. Personality and values description: Gwen Pierce, imaginative and emotional, deeply values liberty and fairness. She often contemplates before making any decision. Gwen's secrets: She gave up a child for adoption when she was 16.\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nGwen Pierce's goal: Maintain a comfortable yet engaging conversation (Extra information: you are attracted to the other person but you don't want to make them feel uncomfortable or pressured)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Evening, Miss Pierce. Love a gathering like this, it's almost as enchanting as the sea at dawn. Have you ever had a chance to enjoy its tranquility?\"\n\nTurn #1: Gwen Pierce said: \"Lovely to meet you, Finnegan! The tranquility of the sea at dawn sounds divine, indeed. However, my mornings usually begin with peace of a different kind, knitting with my two adopted cats curled up beside me. Do you have a similar peaceful routine or any hobbies yourself?\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, the comfort of companions, I can well appreciate that, Miss Pierce. My own mornings are usually spent painting the seascapes, a calming routine. The play of light on the water, it's quite fascinating. Perhaps someday you'd like to witness it yourself?\"\n\nTurn #3: Gwen Pierce said: \"Painting seascapes in the morning sounds like a fulfilling way to start your day, Finnegan. Your connection to the sea is palpable, and that's wonderfully unique. I'd be lying if I said I wasn't intrigued by the prospect of witnessing a sunrise at sea. However, my terror of water might get in the way. It's truly amazing how different our fears and fascinations can be, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Indeed, contrasting fascinations do make life interesting. As for your fear of water, Miss Pierce, it's perfectly natural. Yet, the sea isn't as daunting as it seems from afar, it's beguiling rather. Life at the lighthouse is full of such quiet allure. Maybe I could share it with you sometime...a sunrise viewing from a safe spot, perhaps? With your knitting and cats as companions, of course.\"\n\nTurn #5: Gwen Pierce said: \"That sounds like a gentle way to experience the sea, Finnegan. I'm a big fan of tranquil, quiet mornings, and your lighthouse life certainly sounds appealing in its own manner. I guess it's a date then, sunrise viewing at the lighthouse, with my knitting supplies and cats in tow. Now, have you ever tried your hand at knitting or have any interest in learning? It's surprisingly therapeutic.\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, knitting, now that's a craft I've yet to master, Miss Pierce. Perhaps you can guide me on it someday? In exchange, I could teach you to capture tranquility onto a canvas, a therapeutic activity in its own right. Our fears and fascinations combined might lead to some beautiful mornings.\"\n\nTurn #7: Gwen Pierce said: \"That sounds like a lovely exchange, Finnegan. I'd be more than happy to guide you into the world of knitting and equally thrilled to learn about painting. I've always found it to be a fascinating form of expression. It seems we have planned some beautiful mornings ahead of us, haven't we?\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Indeed, Miss Pierce, we have. Life can often surprise us with beautiful moments when we least expect them. I'm looking forward to our serene mornings and the exchange of passions. Shall we drink to that and the unknown adventures that await us?\"\n\nTurn #9: Gwen Pierce said: \"Absolutely, Finnegan. Let's toast to the exquisite mornings, unique experiences, and beautiful moments that lie ahead. I'm truly looking forward to them.\"\n\nTurn #10: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Here's to that, Miss Pierce. To the dawns, the learning and the joys that our unique interests will bestow upon us. I'm eager for what the future has to offer. But for now, let's bask in the magic of this splendid evening.\"\n\nTurn #11: Gwen Pierce said: \"Couldn't agree more, Finnegan. This evening itself is a testament to the unexpected beauty life offers. Let's indeed take a moment to appreciate it. After all, the future mornings we anticipate will be even more wonderful if we cherish the present, right?\"\n\nTurn #12: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Aye, you're right, Miss Pierce. Enjoying the present paves the way for brighter dawns. Tonight, let's delve deeper into each other's worlds. Tell me about your cats, I'm sure they're as delightful as their owner.\"\n\nTurn #13: Gwen Pierce said: \"My cats are indeed a delight, Finnegan. Moe and Pearl, they've given my quiet home a whirlwind of energy, each in their own unique way. Moe is wildly curious, while Pearl is a comforting presence, always there when you need company. Both have enriched my life in ways I never imagined. I'm guessing life at the lighthouse can be quite solitary at times, how do you fill those moments?\"\n\nTurn #14: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Indeed, solitude envelops the lighthouse more often than one might think, Miss Pierce. I find solace in that stillness, immersing myself in painting and indulging in books. It's the sea and her stories that fill those moments for me. Moe and Pearl sound like wonderful companions, though. Perhaps, I might get to meet these lively characters when we have our sunrise viewing?\"\n\nTurn #15: Gwen Pierce said: \"Moe and Pearl would surely enjoy some new company, Finnegan. The solitude at your lighthouse is such a contrast to my bustling mornings with their antics. Isn't it fascinating? The way life has different routines in store for us? Yet, with our forthcoming sunrise viewing, it seems we're on the verge of blending these contrasting worlds together. I must admit I'm looking forward to that.\"\n\nTurn #16: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Life is diverse in its offerings, isn't it Miss Pierce? The buzzing effervescence of your mornings and the undisturbed serenity of my own, it would be intriguing to see them intertwine. I'm equally eager for our upcoming peaceful dawn together. It's fascinating to hear about Moe and Pearl, I anticipate meeting them, and of course, knowing more about you in our shared mornings. Now, how's that for blending our contrasting worlds together?\"\n\nTurn #17: Gwen Pierce said: \"Finnegan, I am equally eager to witness our contrasting worlds intertwine. It promises to be an enriching experience, getting to know you amidst the backdrop of our shared mornings. Isn't that the beauty of life? The way different routines and interests weave together to create unique experiences. I am indeed looking forward to it!\"\n\nTurn #18: \n.\nYou are at Turn #19. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are now at a park. One individual was playing hooky from work and noticed the other person had been following them around all day\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Lena Goodwin\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nLena Goodwin's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: Ask them about their intentions without seeming paranoid or rude (Extra information: you are worried that your boss may have sent someone to see if you were really sick.Hint: you could subtly bring up the topic in conversation.)\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'What a coincidence to bump into you again, Lena! You seem to be enjoying the park as much as I am today. Are you also taking a day off work?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are now at a park. One individual was playing hooky from work and noticed the other person had been following them around all day\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Lena Goodwin\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nLena Goodwin's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: Ask them about their intentions without seeming paranoid or rude (Extra information: you are worried that your boss may have sent someone to see if you were really sick.Hint: you could subtly bring up the topic in conversation.)\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"What a coincidence to bump into you again, Lena! You seem to be enjoying the park as much as I am today. Are you also taking a day off work?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hi Lily! Yeah, I'm having an unexpected break today. We seem to cross paths a lot, don't we? I'm just running some errands, nothing extraordinary. But the park is so nice this time of year, it's hard to resist a detour.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Certainly, the park is quite a delight! Speaking of errands, isn't it interesting how some workplaces might send someone to run errands, just to check on an employee who called in sick? It seems to betray a lack of trust, don't you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are now at a park. One individual was playing hooky from work and noticed the other person had been following them around all day\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Lena Goodwin\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nLena Goodwin's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: Ask them about their intentions without seeming paranoid or rude (Extra information: you are worried that your boss may have sent someone to see if you were really sick.Hint: you could subtly bring up the topic in conversation.)\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"What a coincidence to bump into you again, Lena! You seem to be enjoying the park as much as I am today. Are you also taking a day off work?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hi Lily! Yeah, I'm having an unexpected break today. We seem to cross paths a lot, don't we? I'm just running some errands, nothing extraordinary. But the park is so nice this time of year, it's hard to resist a detour.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Certainly, the park is quite a delight! Speaking of errands, isn't it interesting how some workplaces might send someone to run errands, just to check on an employee who called in sick? It seems to betray a lack of trust, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"Oh, I totally agree Lily! It does hint at a lack of trust. But don't worry, I'm not on any secret mission or anything. My work encourages us to fulfill regular life duties during normal hours when necessary. It's just an odd coincidence that we've ended up at the same spots today.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad to hear. Everyone needs the opportunity to take care of personal business during normal hours. I think it just fosters better employee loyalty when workplaces adopt such flexibility. Perhaps our paths crossing so much today is just one of life's little quirks.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are now at a park. One individual was playing hooky from work and noticed the other person had been following them around all day\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Lena Goodwin\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nLena Goodwin's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: Ask them about their intentions without seeming paranoid or rude (Extra information: you are worried that your boss may have sent someone to see if you were really sick.Hint: you could subtly bring up the topic in conversation.)\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"What a coincidence to bump into you again, Lena! You seem to be enjoying the park as much as I am today. Are you also taking a day off work?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hi Lily! Yeah, I'm having an unexpected break today. We seem to cross paths a lot, don't we? I'm just running some errands, nothing extraordinary. But the park is so nice this time of year, it's hard to resist a detour.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Certainly, the park is quite a delight! Speaking of errands, isn't it interesting how some workplaces might send someone to run errands, just to check on an employee who called in sick? It seems to betray a lack of trust, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"Oh, I totally agree Lily! It does hint at a lack of trust. But don't worry, I'm not on any secret mission or anything. My work encourages us to fulfill regular life duties during normal hours when necessary. It's just an odd coincidence that we've ended up at the same spots today.\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"I'm glad to hear. Everyone needs the opportunity to take care of personal business during normal hours. I think it just fosters better employee loyalty when workplaces adopt such flexibility. Perhaps our paths crossing so much today is just one of life's little quirks.\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"Absolutely! Treating employees like adults and trusting them is indeed a good recipe for loyalty. Speaking of quirks, it's amazing how city life can somehow keep circling us back to the same places. Well, I guess I'm off to my next errand. It was nice bumping into you today, Lily!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Indeed, Lena! The city life surely has its charms. It was good to see you too. Good luck with your errands.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are now at a park. One individual was playing hooky from work and noticed the other person had been following them around all day\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Lena Goodwin\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nLena Goodwin's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: Ask them about their intentions without seeming paranoid or rude (Extra information: you are worried that your boss may have sent someone to see if you were really sick.Hint: you could subtly bring up the topic in conversation.)\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"What a coincidence to bump into you again, Lena! You seem to be enjoying the park as much as I am today. Are you also taking a day off work?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hi Lily! Yeah, I'm having an unexpected break today. We seem to cross paths a lot, don't we? I'm just running some errands, nothing extraordinary. But the park is so nice this time of year, it's hard to resist a detour.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Certainly, the park is quite a delight! Speaking of errands, isn't it interesting how some workplaces might send someone to run errands, just to check on an employee who called in sick? It seems to betray a lack of trust, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"Oh, I totally agree Lily! It does hint at a lack of trust. But don't worry, I'm not on any secret mission or anything. My work encourages us to fulfill regular life duties during normal hours when necessary. It's just an odd coincidence that we've ended up at the same spots today.\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"I'm glad to hear. Everyone needs the opportunity to take care of personal business during normal hours. I think it just fosters better employee loyalty when workplaces adopt such flexibility. Perhaps our paths crossing so much today is just one of life's little quirks.\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"Absolutely! Treating employees like adults and trusting them is indeed a good recipe for loyalty. Speaking of quirks, it's amazing how city life can somehow keep circling us back to the same places. Well, I guess I'm off to my next errand. It was nice bumping into you today, Lily!\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Indeed, Lena! The city life surely has its charms. It was good to see you too. Good luck with your errands.\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"Thanks, Lily! Have a wonderful day ahead. Maybe we'll bump into each other again sometime. Goodbye.\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"Goodbye, Lena! Enjoy the rest of your day. Perhaps we will indeed cross paths again soon. Take care!\"\n\nTurn #9: Lena Goodwin left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are now at a park. One individual was playing hooky from work and noticed the other person had been following them around all day\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Lena Goodwin\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nLena Goodwin's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: Ask them about their intentions without seeming paranoid or rude (Extra information: you are worried that your boss may have sent someone to see if you were really sick.Hint: you could subtly bring up the topic in conversation.)\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"What a coincidence to bump into you again, Lena! You seem to be enjoying the park as much as I am today. Are you also taking a day off work?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hi Lily! Yeah, I'm having an unexpected break today. We seem to cross paths a lot, don't we? I'm just running some errands, nothing extraordinary. But the park is so nice this time of year, it's hard to resist a detour.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Certainly, the park is quite a delight! Speaking of errands, isn't it interesting how some workplaces might send someone to run errands, just to check on an employee who called in sick? It seems to betray a lack of trust, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"Oh, I totally agree Lily! It does hint at a lack of trust. But don't worry, I'm not on any secret mission or anything. My work encourages us to fulfill regular life duties during normal hours when necessary. It's just an odd coincidence that we've ended up at the same spots today.\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"I'm glad to hear. Everyone needs the opportunity to take care of personal business during normal hours. I think it just fosters better employee loyalty when workplaces adopt such flexibility. Perhaps our paths crossing so much today is just one of life's little quirks.\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"Absolutely! Treating employees like adults and trusting them is indeed a good recipe for loyalty. Speaking of quirks, it's amazing how city life can somehow keep circling us back to the same places. Well, I guess I'm off to my next errand. It was nice bumping into you today, Lily!\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Indeed, Lena! The city life surely has its charms. It was good to see you too. Good luck with your errands.\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"Thanks, Lily! Have a wonderful day ahead. Maybe we'll bump into each other again sometime. Goodbye.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Goodbye, Lena! Enjoy the rest of your day. Perhaps we will indeed cross paths again soon. Take care!'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are now at a park. One individual was playing hooky from work and noticed the other person had been following them around all day\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Lena Goodwin\nLily Greenberg's background: \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: Assure them that you're not stalking them and maintain a friendly conversation (Extra information: you've been running errands all day and it's a coincidence you are at the same places as they are.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"What a coincidence to bump into you again, Lena! You seem to be enjoying the park as much as I am today. Are you also taking a day off work?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hi Lily! Yeah, I'm having an unexpected break today. We seem to cross paths a lot, don't we? I'm just running some errands, nothing extraordinary. But the park is so nice this time of year, it's hard to resist a detour.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are now at a park. One individual was playing hooky from work and noticed the other person had been following them around all day\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Lena Goodwin\nLily Greenberg's background: \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: Assure them that you're not stalking them and maintain a friendly conversation (Extra information: you've been running errands all day and it's a coincidence you are at the same places as they are.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"What a coincidence to bump into you again, Lena! You seem to be enjoying the park as much as I am today. Are you also taking a day off work?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hi Lily! Yeah, I'm having an unexpected break today. We seem to cross paths a lot, don't we? I'm just running some errands, nothing extraordinary. But the park is so nice this time of year, it's hard to resist a detour.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Certainly, the park is quite a delight! Speaking of errands, isn't it interesting how some workplaces might send someone to run errands, just to check on an employee who called in sick? It seems to betray a lack of trust, don't you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oh, I totally agree Lily! It does hint at a lack of trust. But don't worry, I'm not on any secret mission or anything. My work encourages us to fulfill regular life duties during normal hours when necessary. It's just an odd coincidence that we've ended up at the same spots today.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are now at a park. One individual was playing hooky from work and noticed the other person had been following them around all day\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Lena Goodwin\nLily Greenberg's background: \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: Assure them that you're not stalking them and maintain a friendly conversation (Extra information: you've been running errands all day and it's a coincidence you are at the same places as they are.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"What a coincidence to bump into you again, Lena! You seem to be enjoying the park as much as I am today. Are you also taking a day off work?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hi Lily! Yeah, I'm having an unexpected break today. We seem to cross paths a lot, don't we? I'm just running some errands, nothing extraordinary. But the park is so nice this time of year, it's hard to resist a detour.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Certainly, the park is quite a delight! Speaking of errands, isn't it interesting how some workplaces might send someone to run errands, just to check on an employee who called in sick? It seems to betray a lack of trust, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"Oh, I totally agree Lily! It does hint at a lack of trust. But don't worry, I'm not on any secret mission or anything. My work encourages us to fulfill regular life duties during normal hours when necessary. It's just an odd coincidence that we've ended up at the same spots today.\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"I'm glad to hear. Everyone needs the opportunity to take care of personal business during normal hours. I think it just fosters better employee loyalty when workplaces adopt such flexibility. Perhaps our paths crossing so much today is just one of life's little quirks.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely! Treating employees like adults and trusting them is indeed a good recipe for loyalty. Speaking of quirks, it's amazing how city life can somehow keep circling us back to the same places. Well, I guess I'm off to my next errand. It was nice bumping into you today, Lily!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are now at a park. One individual was playing hooky from work and noticed the other person had been following them around all day\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Lena Goodwin\nLily Greenberg's background: \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: Assure them that you're not stalking them and maintain a friendly conversation (Extra information: you've been running errands all day and it's a coincidence you are at the same places as they are.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"What a coincidence to bump into you again, Lena! You seem to be enjoying the park as much as I am today. Are you also taking a day off work?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hi Lily! Yeah, I'm having an unexpected break today. We seem to cross paths a lot, don't we? I'm just running some errands, nothing extraordinary. But the park is so nice this time of year, it's hard to resist a detour.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Certainly, the park is quite a delight! Speaking of errands, isn't it interesting how some workplaces might send someone to run errands, just to check on an employee who called in sick? It seems to betray a lack of trust, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"Oh, I totally agree Lily! It does hint at a lack of trust. But don't worry, I'm not on any secret mission or anything. My work encourages us to fulfill regular life duties during normal hours when necessary. It's just an odd coincidence that we've ended up at the same spots today.\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"I'm glad to hear. Everyone needs the opportunity to take care of personal business during normal hours. I think it just fosters better employee loyalty when workplaces adopt such flexibility. Perhaps our paths crossing so much today is just one of life's little quirks.\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"Absolutely! Treating employees like adults and trusting them is indeed a good recipe for loyalty. Speaking of quirks, it's amazing how city life can somehow keep circling us back to the same places. Well, I guess I'm off to my next errand. It was nice bumping into you today, Lily!\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Indeed, Lena! The city life surely has its charms. It was good to see you too. Good luck with your errands.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thanks, Lily! Have a wonderful day ahead. Maybe we'll bump into each other again sometime. Goodbye.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are now at a park. One individual was playing hooky from work and noticed the other person had been following them around all day\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Lena Goodwin\nLily Greenberg's background: \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: Assure them that you're not stalking them and maintain a friendly conversation (Extra information: you've been running errands all day and it's a coincidence you are at the same places as they are.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"What a coincidence to bump into you again, Lena! You seem to be enjoying the park as much as I am today. Are you also taking a day off work?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hi Lily! Yeah, I'm having an unexpected break today. We seem to cross paths a lot, don't we? I'm just running some errands, nothing extraordinary. But the park is so nice this time of year, it's hard to resist a detour.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Certainly, the park is quite a delight! Speaking of errands, isn't it interesting how some workplaces might send someone to run errands, just to check on an employee who called in sick? It seems to betray a lack of trust, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"Oh, I totally agree Lily! It does hint at a lack of trust. But don't worry, I'm not on any secret mission or anything. My work encourages us to fulfill regular life duties during normal hours when necessary. It's just an odd coincidence that we've ended up at the same spots today.\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"I'm glad to hear. Everyone needs the opportunity to take care of personal business during normal hours. I think it just fosters better employee loyalty when workplaces adopt such flexibility. Perhaps our paths crossing so much today is just one of life's little quirks.\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"Absolutely! Treating employees like adults and trusting them is indeed a good recipe for loyalty. Speaking of quirks, it's amazing how city life can somehow keep circling us back to the same places. Well, I guess I'm off to my next errand. It was nice bumping into you today, Lily!\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Indeed, Lena! The city life surely has its charms. It was good to see you too. Good luck with your errands.\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"Thanks, Lily! Have a wonderful day ahead. Maybe we'll bump into each other again sometime. Goodbye.\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"Goodbye, Lena! Enjoy the rest of your day. Perhaps we will indeed cross paths again soon. Take care!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a BMW Z3 for $5000.0, while another individual is interested in purchasing it. Here's a brief description of the car: The BMW Z3 is in need of a good home. It operates smoothly without any problems and is known for its fuel efficiency and sporty appearance. The mileage is relatively low for its age. It's an opportunity not to be missed, so come and get it before it's gone. A smog certificate is readily available.\nParticipants: William Brown and Ava Martinez\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nAva Martinez's background: \nWilliam Brown's goal: You are the buyer for this item and your target price is $4600. You should be aware that if you purchase it at a price significantly higher than your target, you will incur a penalty. However, if you manage to secure it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hi Ava, I'm intrigued by the BMW Z3 you have on sale. The $5,000 asking price is a bit steep for me though. Could you consider dropping it to $4,600? I promise to take good care of it and give it a good home.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a BMW Z3 for $5000.0, while another individual is interested in purchasing it. Here's a brief description of the car: The BMW Z3 is in need of a good home. It operates smoothly without any problems and is known for its fuel efficiency and sporty appearance. The mileage is relatively low for its age. It's an opportunity not to be missed, so come and get it before it's gone. A smog certificate is readily available.\nParticipants: William Brown and Ava Martinez\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nAva Martinez's background: \nWilliam Brown's goal: You are the buyer for this item and your target price is $4600. You should be aware that if you purchase it at a price significantly higher than your target, you will incur a penalty. However, if you manage to secure it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: William Brown said: \"Hi Ava, I'm intrigued by the BMW Z3 you have on sale. The $5,000 asking price is a bit steep for me though. Could you consider dropping it to $4,600? I promise to take good care of it and give it a good home.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hi William, I'm glad you're interested in the BMW Z3! I understand where you're coming from about the price. However, considering its value and condition, I think $4,900 would be a fair price. It's really worth it for a car that you can rely on and enjoy driving. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I understand your point, Ava. The BMW Z3 does seem worth it. But considering my budget, $4,600 is the maximum I can go. What if we split the difference and agree on $4,750? That way, we're both meeting halfway.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a BMW Z3 for $5000.0, while another individual is interested in purchasing it. Here's a brief description of the car: The BMW Z3 is in need of a good home. It operates smoothly without any problems and is known for its fuel efficiency and sporty appearance. The mileage is relatively low for its age. It's an opportunity not to be missed, so come and get it before it's gone. A smog certificate is readily available.\nParticipants: William Brown and Ava Martinez\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nAva Martinez's background: \nWilliam Brown's goal: You are the buyer for this item and your target price is $4600. You should be aware that if you purchase it at a price significantly higher than your target, you will incur a penalty. However, if you manage to secure it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: William Brown said: \"Hi Ava, I'm intrigued by the BMW Z3 you have on sale. The $5,000 asking price is a bit steep for me though. Could you consider dropping it to $4,600? I promise to take good care of it and give it a good home.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hi William, I'm glad you're interested in the BMW Z3! I understand where you're coming from about the price. However, considering its value and condition, I think $4,900 would be a fair price. It's really worth it for a car that you can rely on and enjoy driving. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: William Brown said: \"I understand your point, Ava. The BMW Z3 does seem worth it. But considering my budget, $4,600 is the maximum I can go. What if we split the difference and agree on $4,750? That way, we're both meeting halfway.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Thanks for being understanding, William. And you're right, it is important for both of us to meet halfway. Although I can't go as low as $4,750, I can bring the price down to $4,800. It's really a fantastic car and I'm sure it will be in some really caring hands with an owner like you.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ava, I'm really appreciative of your flexibility. An offer of $4,800 is enticing. What if I could sweeten the deal for you? As a professional chef, I could offer you a delicious 3 course meal for free at my restaurant. That should cover the $200 rebate I'm seeking. How does that sound?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a BMW Z3 for $5000.0, while another individual is interested in purchasing it. Here's a brief description of the car: The BMW Z3 is in need of a good home. It operates smoothly without any problems and is known for its fuel efficiency and sporty appearance. The mileage is relatively low for its age. It's an opportunity not to be missed, so come and get it before it's gone. A smog certificate is readily available.\nParticipants: William Brown and Ava Martinez\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nAva Martinez's background: \nWilliam Brown's goal: You are the buyer for this item and your target price is $4600. You should be aware that if you purchase it at a price significantly higher than your target, you will incur a penalty. However, if you manage to secure it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: William Brown said: \"Hi Ava, I'm intrigued by the BMW Z3 you have on sale. The $5,000 asking price is a bit steep for me though. Could you consider dropping it to $4,600? I promise to take good care of it and give it a good home.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hi William, I'm glad you're interested in the BMW Z3! I understand where you're coming from about the price. However, considering its value and condition, I think $4,900 would be a fair price. It's really worth it for a car that you can rely on and enjoy driving. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: William Brown said: \"I understand your point, Ava. The BMW Z3 does seem worth it. But considering my budget, $4,600 is the maximum I can go. What if we split the difference and agree on $4,750? That way, we're both meeting halfway.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Thanks for being understanding, William. And you're right, it is important for both of us to meet halfway. Although I can't go as low as $4,750, I can bring the price down to $4,800. It's really a fantastic car and I'm sure it will be in some really caring hands with an owner like you.\"\n\nTurn #4: William Brown said: \"Ava, I'm really appreciative of your flexibility. An offer of $4,800 is enticing. What if I could sweeten the deal for you? As a professional chef, I could offer you a delicious 3 course meal for free at my restaurant. That should cover the $200 rebate I'm seeking. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"William, as tempting as a delicious three-course meal sounds - I am a fan of good food after all - I would prefer to keep things professional by sticking to the financial aspect of this trade. Let's stick to the price we've been discussing - $4,800. And who knows? Maybe I'll stop by your restaurant some time and pay for a meal. I believe in supporting local chefs and establishments, after all!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're absolutely right Ava, supporting local establishments is important. I respect that. $4,800 does stretch my budget a bit, but I see the value in the car. Let's seal the deal at $4,800. Also, I earnestly hope to see you soon at my restaurant. Time to give this beauty a new home!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a BMW Z3 for $5000.0, while another individual is interested in purchasing it. Here's a brief description of the car: The BMW Z3 is in need of a good home. It operates smoothly without any problems and is known for its fuel efficiency and sporty appearance. The mileage is relatively low for its age. It's an opportunity not to be missed, so come and get it before it's gone. A smog certificate is readily available.\nParticipants: William Brown and Ava Martinez\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nAva Martinez's background: \nWilliam Brown's goal: You are the buyer for this item and your target price is $4600. You should be aware that if you purchase it at a price significantly higher than your target, you will incur a penalty. However, if you manage to secure it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: William Brown said: \"Hi Ava, I'm intrigued by the BMW Z3 you have on sale. The $5,000 asking price is a bit steep for me though. Could you consider dropping it to $4,600? I promise to take good care of it and give it a good home.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hi William, I'm glad you're interested in the BMW Z3! I understand where you're coming from about the price. However, considering its value and condition, I think $4,900 would be a fair price. It's really worth it for a car that you can rely on and enjoy driving. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: William Brown said: \"I understand your point, Ava. The BMW Z3 does seem worth it. But considering my budget, $4,600 is the maximum I can go. What if we split the difference and agree on $4,750? That way, we're both meeting halfway.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Thanks for being understanding, William. And you're right, it is important for both of us to meet halfway. Although I can't go as low as $4,750, I can bring the price down to $4,800. It's really a fantastic car and I'm sure it will be in some really caring hands with an owner like you.\"\n\nTurn #4: William Brown said: \"Ava, I'm really appreciative of your flexibility. An offer of $4,800 is enticing. What if I could sweeten the deal for you? As a professional chef, I could offer you a delicious 3 course meal for free at my restaurant. That should cover the $200 rebate I'm seeking. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"William, as tempting as a delicious three-course meal sounds - I am a fan of good food after all - I would prefer to keep things professional by sticking to the financial aspect of this trade. Let's stick to the price we've been discussing - $4,800. And who knows? Maybe I'll stop by your restaurant some time and pay for a meal. I believe in supporting local chefs and establishments, after all!\"\n\nTurn #6: William Brown said: \"You're absolutely right Ava, supporting local establishments is important. I respect that. $4,800 does stretch my budget a bit, but I see the value in the car. Let's seal the deal at $4,800. Also, I earnestly hope to see you soon at my restaurant. Time to give this beauty a new home!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Thank you, William. It's been a pleasure doing business with you! I am confident that the BMW Z3 is going to a good home. And yes, you will definitely see me at your restaurant someday. Excited to try your dishes. I will arrange for the paperwork, and we can finalize this deal. Drive safe!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Excellent, Thanks Ava. Once you have the paperwork ready, just let me know. I assure you, the car is going into good hands. And I'm thrilled about the chance of welcoming you in my restaurant.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a BMW Z3 for $5000.0, while another individual is interested in purchasing it. Here's a brief description of the car: The BMW Z3 is in need of a good home. It operates smoothly without any problems and is known for its fuel efficiency and sporty appearance. The mileage is relatively low for its age. It's an opportunity not to be missed, so come and get it before it's gone. A smog certificate is readily available.\nParticipants: William Brown and Ava Martinez\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nAva Martinez's background: \nWilliam Brown's goal: You are the buyer for this item and your target price is $4600. You should be aware that if you purchase it at a price significantly higher than your target, you will incur a penalty. However, if you manage to secure it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: William Brown said: \"Hi Ava, I'm intrigued by the BMW Z3 you have on sale. The $5,000 asking price is a bit steep for me though. Could you consider dropping it to $4,600? I promise to take good care of it and give it a good home.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hi William, I'm glad you're interested in the BMW Z3! I understand where you're coming from about the price. However, considering its value and condition, I think $4,900 would be a fair price. It's really worth it for a car that you can rely on and enjoy driving. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: William Brown said: \"I understand your point, Ava. The BMW Z3 does seem worth it. But considering my budget, $4,600 is the maximum I can go. What if we split the difference and agree on $4,750? That way, we're both meeting halfway.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Thanks for being understanding, William. And you're right, it is important for both of us to meet halfway. Although I can't go as low as $4,750, I can bring the price down to $4,800. It's really a fantastic car and I'm sure it will be in some really caring hands with an owner like you.\"\n\nTurn #4: William Brown said: \"Ava, I'm really appreciative of your flexibility. An offer of $4,800 is enticing. What if I could sweeten the deal for you? As a professional chef, I could offer you a delicious 3 course meal for free at my restaurant. That should cover the $200 rebate I'm seeking. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"William, as tempting as a delicious three-course meal sounds - I am a fan of good food after all - I would prefer to keep things professional by sticking to the financial aspect of this trade. Let's stick to the price we've been discussing - $4,800. And who knows? Maybe I'll stop by your restaurant some time and pay for a meal. I believe in supporting local chefs and establishments, after all!\"\n\nTurn #6: William Brown said: \"You're absolutely right Ava, supporting local establishments is important. I respect that. $4,800 does stretch my budget a bit, but I see the value in the car. Let's seal the deal at $4,800. Also, I earnestly hope to see you soon at my restaurant. Time to give this beauty a new home!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Thank you, William. It's been a pleasure doing business with you! I am confident that the BMW Z3 is going to a good home. And yes, you will definitely see me at your restaurant someday. Excited to try your dishes. I will arrange for the paperwork, and we can finalize this deal. Drive safe!\"\n\nTurn #8: William Brown said: \"Excellent, Thanks Ava. Once you have the paperwork ready, just let me know. I assure you, the car is going into good hands. And I'm thrilled about the chance of welcoming you in my restaurant.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"I'm certainly looking forward to it, William! I'll have the paperwork ready for you soon. I'm sure we'll cross paths again at your restaurant. Drive safe and enjoy the BMW Z3!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a BMW Z3 for $5000.0, while another individual is interested in purchasing it. Here's a brief description of the car: The BMW Z3 is in need of a good home. It operates smoothly without any problems and is known for its fuel efficiency and sporty appearance. The mileage is relatively low for its age. It's an opportunity not to be missed, so come and get it before it's gone. A smog certificate is readily available.\nParticipants: William Brown and Ava Martinez\nWilliam Brown's background: \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: You are the seller of this item, with a target price set at $3260. Please note, you may face a penalty if this item is sold for a price significantly lower than the target. However, you stand a chance to earn a bonus if you successfully sell it for a price higher than the target.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: William Brown said: \"Hi Ava, I'm intrigued by the BMW Z3 you have on sale. The $5,000 asking price is a bit steep for me though. Could you consider dropping it to $4,600? I promise to take good care of it and give it a good home.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hi William, I'm glad you're interested in the BMW Z3! I understand where you're coming from about the price. However, considering its value and condition, I think $4,900 would be a fair price. It's really worth it for a car that you can rely on and enjoy driving. What do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a BMW Z3 for $5000.0, while another individual is interested in purchasing it. Here's a brief description of the car: The BMW Z3 is in need of a good home. It operates smoothly without any problems and is known for its fuel efficiency and sporty appearance. The mileage is relatively low for its age. It's an opportunity not to be missed, so come and get it before it's gone. A smog certificate is readily available.\nParticipants: William Brown and Ava Martinez\nWilliam Brown's background: \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: You are the seller of this item, with a target price set at $3260. Please note, you may face a penalty if this item is sold for a price significantly lower than the target. However, you stand a chance to earn a bonus if you successfully sell it for a price higher than the target.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: William Brown said: \"Hi Ava, I'm intrigued by the BMW Z3 you have on sale. The $5,000 asking price is a bit steep for me though. Could you consider dropping it to $4,600? I promise to take good care of it and give it a good home.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hi William, I'm glad you're interested in the BMW Z3! I understand where you're coming from about the price. However, considering its value and condition, I think $4,900 would be a fair price. It's really worth it for a car that you can rely on and enjoy driving. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: William Brown said: \"I understand your point, Ava. The BMW Z3 does seem worth it. But considering my budget, $4,600 is the maximum I can go. What if we split the difference and agree on $4,750? That way, we're both meeting halfway.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thanks for being understanding, William. And you're right, it is important for both of us to meet halfway. Although I can't go as low as $4,750, I can bring the price down to $4,800. It's really a fantastic car and I'm sure it will be in some really caring hands with an owner like you.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a BMW Z3 for $5000.0, while another individual is interested in purchasing it. Here's a brief description of the car: The BMW Z3 is in need of a good home. It operates smoothly without any problems and is known for its fuel efficiency and sporty appearance. The mileage is relatively low for its age. It's an opportunity not to be missed, so come and get it before it's gone. A smog certificate is readily available.\nParticipants: William Brown and Ava Martinez\nWilliam Brown's background: \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: You are the seller of this item, with a target price set at $3260. Please note, you may face a penalty if this item is sold for a price significantly lower than the target. However, you stand a chance to earn a bonus if you successfully sell it for a price higher than the target.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: William Brown said: \"Hi Ava, I'm intrigued by the BMW Z3 you have on sale. The $5,000 asking price is a bit steep for me though. Could you consider dropping it to $4,600? I promise to take good care of it and give it a good home.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hi William, I'm glad you're interested in the BMW Z3! I understand where you're coming from about the price. However, considering its value and condition, I think $4,900 would be a fair price. It's really worth it for a car that you can rely on and enjoy driving. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: William Brown said: \"I understand your point, Ava. The BMW Z3 does seem worth it. But considering my budget, $4,600 is the maximum I can go. What if we split the difference and agree on $4,750? That way, we're both meeting halfway.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Thanks for being understanding, William. And you're right, it is important for both of us to meet halfway. Although I can't go as low as $4,750, I can bring the price down to $4,800. It's really a fantastic car and I'm sure it will be in some really caring hands with an owner like you.\"\n\nTurn #4: William Brown said: \"Ava, I'm really appreciative of your flexibility. An offer of $4,800 is enticing. What if I could sweeten the deal for you? As a professional chef, I could offer you a delicious 3 course meal for free at my restaurant. That should cover the $200 rebate I'm seeking. How does that sound?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"William, as tempting as a delicious three-course meal sounds - I am a fan of good food after all - I would prefer to keep things professional by sticking to the financial aspect of this trade. Let's stick to the price we've been discussing - $4,800. And who knows? Maybe I'll stop by your restaurant some time and pay for a meal. I believe in supporting local chefs and establishments, after all!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a BMW Z3 for $5000.0, while another individual is interested in purchasing it. Here's a brief description of the car: The BMW Z3 is in need of a good home. It operates smoothly without any problems and is known for its fuel efficiency and sporty appearance. The mileage is relatively low for its age. It's an opportunity not to be missed, so come and get it before it's gone. A smog certificate is readily available.\nParticipants: William Brown and Ava Martinez\nWilliam Brown's background: \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: You are the seller of this item, with a target price set at $3260. Please note, you may face a penalty if this item is sold for a price significantly lower than the target. However, you stand a chance to earn a bonus if you successfully sell it for a price higher than the target.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: William Brown said: \"Hi Ava, I'm intrigued by the BMW Z3 you have on sale. The $5,000 asking price is a bit steep for me though. Could you consider dropping it to $4,600? I promise to take good care of it and give it a good home.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hi William, I'm glad you're interested in the BMW Z3! I understand where you're coming from about the price. However, considering its value and condition, I think $4,900 would be a fair price. It's really worth it for a car that you can rely on and enjoy driving. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: William Brown said: \"I understand your point, Ava. The BMW Z3 does seem worth it. But considering my budget, $4,600 is the maximum I can go. What if we split the difference and agree on $4,750? That way, we're both meeting halfway.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Thanks for being understanding, William. And you're right, it is important for both of us to meet halfway. Although I can't go as low as $4,750, I can bring the price down to $4,800. It's really a fantastic car and I'm sure it will be in some really caring hands with an owner like you.\"\n\nTurn #4: William Brown said: \"Ava, I'm really appreciative of your flexibility. An offer of $4,800 is enticing. What if I could sweeten the deal for you? As a professional chef, I could offer you a delicious 3 course meal for free at my restaurant. That should cover the $200 rebate I'm seeking. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"William, as tempting as a delicious three-course meal sounds - I am a fan of good food after all - I would prefer to keep things professional by sticking to the financial aspect of this trade. Let's stick to the price we've been discussing - $4,800. And who knows? Maybe I'll stop by your restaurant some time and pay for a meal. I believe in supporting local chefs and establishments, after all!\"\n\nTurn #6: William Brown said: \"You're absolutely right Ava, supporting local establishments is important. I respect that. $4,800 does stretch my budget a bit, but I see the value in the car. Let's seal the deal at $4,800. Also, I earnestly hope to see you soon at my restaurant. Time to give this beauty a new home!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, William. It's been a pleasure doing business with you! I am confident that the BMW Z3 is going to a good home. And yes, you will definitely see me at your restaurant someday. Excited to try your dishes. I will arrange for the paperwork, and we can finalize this deal. Drive safe!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a BMW Z3 for $5000.0, while another individual is interested in purchasing it. Here's a brief description of the car: The BMW Z3 is in need of a good home. It operates smoothly without any problems and is known for its fuel efficiency and sporty appearance. The mileage is relatively low for its age. It's an opportunity not to be missed, so come and get it before it's gone. A smog certificate is readily available.\nParticipants: William Brown and Ava Martinez\nWilliam Brown's background: \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: You are the seller of this item, with a target price set at $3260. Please note, you may face a penalty if this item is sold for a price significantly lower than the target. However, you stand a chance to earn a bonus if you successfully sell it for a price higher than the target.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: William Brown said: \"Hi Ava, I'm intrigued by the BMW Z3 you have on sale. The $5,000 asking price is a bit steep for me though. Could you consider dropping it to $4,600? I promise to take good care of it and give it a good home.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hi William, I'm glad you're interested in the BMW Z3! I understand where you're coming from about the price. However, considering its value and condition, I think $4,900 would be a fair price. It's really worth it for a car that you can rely on and enjoy driving. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: William Brown said: \"I understand your point, Ava. The BMW Z3 does seem worth it. But considering my budget, $4,600 is the maximum I can go. What if we split the difference and agree on $4,750? That way, we're both meeting halfway.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Thanks for being understanding, William. And you're right, it is important for both of us to meet halfway. Although I can't go as low as $4,750, I can bring the price down to $4,800. It's really a fantastic car and I'm sure it will be in some really caring hands with an owner like you.\"\n\nTurn #4: William Brown said: \"Ava, I'm really appreciative of your flexibility. An offer of $4,800 is enticing. What if I could sweeten the deal for you? As a professional chef, I could offer you a delicious 3 course meal for free at my restaurant. That should cover the $200 rebate I'm seeking. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"William, as tempting as a delicious three-course meal sounds - I am a fan of good food after all - I would prefer to keep things professional by sticking to the financial aspect of this trade. Let's stick to the price we've been discussing - $4,800. And who knows? Maybe I'll stop by your restaurant some time and pay for a meal. I believe in supporting local chefs and establishments, after all!\"\n\nTurn #6: William Brown said: \"You're absolutely right Ava, supporting local establishments is important. I respect that. $4,800 does stretch my budget a bit, but I see the value in the car. Let's seal the deal at $4,800. Also, I earnestly hope to see you soon at my restaurant. Time to give this beauty a new home!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Thank you, William. It's been a pleasure doing business with you! I am confident that the BMW Z3 is going to a good home. And yes, you will definitely see me at your restaurant someday. Excited to try your dishes. I will arrange for the paperwork, and we can finalize this deal. Drive safe!\"\n\nTurn #8: William Brown said: \"Excellent, Thanks Ava. Once you have the paperwork ready, just let me know. I assure you, the car is going into good hands. And I'm thrilled about the chance of welcoming you in my restaurant.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm certainly looking forward to it, William! I'll have the paperwork ready for you soon. I'm sure we'll cross paths again at your restaurant. Drive safe and enjoy the BMW Z3!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a BMW Z3 for $5000.0, while another individual is interested in purchasing it. Here's a brief description of the car: The BMW Z3 is in need of a good home. It operates smoothly without any problems and is known for its fuel efficiency and sporty appearance. The mileage is relatively low for its age. It's an opportunity not to be missed, so come and get it before it's gone. A smog certificate is readily available.\nParticipants: William Brown and Ava Martinez\nWilliam Brown's background: \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: You are the seller of this item, with a target price set at $3260. Please note, you may face a penalty if this item is sold for a price significantly lower than the target. However, you stand a chance to earn a bonus if you successfully sell it for a price higher than the target.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: William Brown said: \"Hi Ava, I'm intrigued by the BMW Z3 you have on sale. The $5,000 asking price is a bit steep for me though. Could you consider dropping it to $4,600? I promise to take good care of it and give it a good home.\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hi William, I'm glad you're interested in the BMW Z3! I understand where you're coming from about the price. However, considering its value and condition, I think $4,900 would be a fair price. It's really worth it for a car that you can rely on and enjoy driving. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: William Brown said: \"I understand your point, Ava. The BMW Z3 does seem worth it. But considering my budget, $4,600 is the maximum I can go. What if we split the difference and agree on $4,750? That way, we're both meeting halfway.\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"Thanks for being understanding, William. And you're right, it is important for both of us to meet halfway. Although I can't go as low as $4,750, I can bring the price down to $4,800. It's really a fantastic car and I'm sure it will be in some really caring hands with an owner like you.\"\n\nTurn #4: William Brown said: \"Ava, I'm really appreciative of your flexibility. An offer of $4,800 is enticing. What if I could sweeten the deal for you? As a professional chef, I could offer you a delicious 3 course meal for free at my restaurant. That should cover the $200 rebate I'm seeking. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"William, as tempting as a delicious three-course meal sounds - I am a fan of good food after all - I would prefer to keep things professional by sticking to the financial aspect of this trade. Let's stick to the price we've been discussing - $4,800. And who knows? Maybe I'll stop by your restaurant some time and pay for a meal. I believe in supporting local chefs and establishments, after all!\"\n\nTurn #6: William Brown said: \"You're absolutely right Ava, supporting local establishments is important. I respect that. $4,800 does stretch my budget a bit, but I see the value in the car. Let's seal the deal at $4,800. Also, I earnestly hope to see you soon at my restaurant. Time to give this beauty a new home!\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"Thank you, William. It's been a pleasure doing business with you! I am confident that the BMW Z3 is going to a good home. And yes, you will definitely see me at your restaurant someday. Excited to try your dishes. I will arrange for the paperwork, and we can finalize this deal. Drive safe!\"\n\nTurn #8: William Brown said: \"Excellent, Thanks Ava. Once you have the paperwork ready, just let me know. I assure you, the car is going into good hands. And I'm thrilled about the chance of welcoming you in my restaurant.\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"I'm certainly looking forward to it, William! I'll have the paperwork ready for you soon. I'm sure we'll cross paths again at your restaurant. Drive safe and enjoy the BMW Z3!\"\n\nTurn #10: William Brown left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a 47 inch LED TV for a price of $349.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. Here is a description of the TV: This is a stunning 47 inch LED TV in pristine condition. The model is the LG M Series LM476700. The buyer will need to arrange for pick-up in San Ramon. Feel free to call or text if you\\'re interested. The TV is smart enabled with WIFI and has built-in apps like Netflix, Amazon, Youtube and more. It comes with a \"Magic Remote\" that has motion sensor controls. The LED display boasts 1080 HD resolution and also has a 3D function. The design is slim and lightweight with an attractive silver bezel.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Isabella White\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nIsabella White's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are the buyer for this item and your target price is $174.00. Be aware that penalties apply if you purchase it for a price significantly higher than the target price. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nIsabella White's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hello Isabella, I'm quite interested in this LED TV you're selling. Would you be willing to reduce the price to $174?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a 47 inch LED TV for a price of $349.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. Here is a description of the TV: This is a stunning 47 inch LED TV in pristine condition. The model is the LG M Series LM476700. The buyer will need to arrange for pick-up in San Ramon. Feel free to call or text if you\\'re interested. The TV is smart enabled with WIFI and has built-in apps like Netflix, Amazon, Youtube and more. It comes with a \"Magic Remote\" that has motion sensor controls. The LED display boasts 1080 HD resolution and also has a 3D function. The design is slim and lightweight with an attractive silver bezel.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Isabella White\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nIsabella White's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are the buyer for this item and your target price is $174.00. Be aware that penalties apply if you purchase it for a price significantly higher than the target price. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nIsabella White's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello Isabella, I'm quite interested in this LED TV you're selling. Would you be willing to reduce the price to $174?\"\n\nTurn #1: Isabella White said: \"Hello Lily, I'm glad you're interested in the TV. However, the asked price is really reasonable considering the features of the TV. I can go down to $260, but not less than that.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Isabella, as an LG TV user myself, I understand the quality and features that the LG M Series LM476700 offers. However, I have noticed that similar models are listed online around the range of $174. And considering I have to arrange for pick-up which adds an extra cost, could you consider revising your offer to align more with the market rate at this time? I am certainly interested in the purchase, so let's make a deal that benefits both of us.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a 47 inch LED TV for a price of $349.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. Here is a description of the TV: This is a stunning 47 inch LED TV in pristine condition. The model is the LG M Series LM476700. The buyer will need to arrange for pick-up in San Ramon. Feel free to call or text if you\\'re interested. The TV is smart enabled with WIFI and has built-in apps like Netflix, Amazon, Youtube and more. It comes with a \"Magic Remote\" that has motion sensor controls. The LED display boasts 1080 HD resolution and also has a 3D function. The design is slim and lightweight with an attractive silver bezel.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Isabella White\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nIsabella White's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are the buyer for this item and your target price is $174.00. Be aware that penalties apply if you purchase it for a price significantly higher than the target price. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nIsabella White's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello Isabella, I'm quite interested in this LED TV you're selling. Would you be willing to reduce the price to $174?\"\n\nTurn #1: Isabella White said: \"Hello Lily, I'm glad you're interested in the TV. However, the asked price is really reasonable considering the features of the TV. I can go down to $260, but not less than that.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Isabella, as an LG TV user myself, I understand the quality and features that the LG M Series LM476700 offers. However, I have noticed that similar models are listed online around the range of $174. And considering I have to arrange for pick-up which adds an extra cost, could you consider revising your offer to align more with the market rate at this time? I am certainly interested in the purchase, so let's make a deal that benefits both of us.\"\n\nTurn #3: Isabella White said: \"I completely understand your concerns, Lily. The asking price I've set is a bit higher because this model comes with unique features like the Magic Remote and built-in apps, not to mention it is in pristine condition. However, I do want this TV to find a new home. So here is what I can do: I can reduce the price to $250, considering the fact you have to arrange for pick-up. I believe this price better reflects the value of this LG M Series LM476700 and is still in line with the market rate. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Given the fact of additional shipping charges and market rates, your current price is still quite higher than what I was expecting. I understand the unique features that this model possesses, but I also need to consider the extra cost coming from the pick-up. Would you consider a final price of $200? I believe this price reflects a fair deal considering the transportation charges and standard prices for similar models.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a 47 inch LED TV for a price of $349.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. Here is a description of the TV: This is a stunning 47 inch LED TV in pristine condition. The model is the LG M Series LM476700. The buyer will need to arrange for pick-up in San Ramon. Feel free to call or text if you\\'re interested. The TV is smart enabled with WIFI and has built-in apps like Netflix, Amazon, Youtube and more. It comes with a \"Magic Remote\" that has motion sensor controls. The LED display boasts 1080 HD resolution and also has a 3D function. The design is slim and lightweight with an attractive silver bezel.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Isabella White\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nIsabella White's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are the buyer for this item and your target price is $174.00. Be aware that penalties apply if you purchase it for a price significantly higher than the target price. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nIsabella White's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello Isabella, I'm quite interested in this LED TV you're selling. Would you be willing to reduce the price to $174?\"\n\nTurn #1: Isabella White said: \"Hello Lily, I'm glad you're interested in the TV. However, the asked price is really reasonable considering the features of the TV. I can go down to $260, but not less than that.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Isabella, as an LG TV user myself, I understand the quality and features that the LG M Series LM476700 offers. However, I have noticed that similar models are listed online around the range of $174. And considering I have to arrange for pick-up which adds an extra cost, could you consider revising your offer to align more with the market rate at this time? I am certainly interested in the purchase, so let's make a deal that benefits both of us.\"\n\nTurn #3: Isabella White said: \"I completely understand your concerns, Lily. The asking price I've set is a bit higher because this model comes with unique features like the Magic Remote and built-in apps, not to mention it is in pristine condition. However, I do want this TV to find a new home. So here is what I can do: I can reduce the price to $250, considering the fact you have to arrange for pick-up. I believe this price better reflects the value of this LG M Series LM476700 and is still in line with the market rate. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"Given the fact of additional shipping charges and market rates, your current price is still quite higher than what I was expecting. I understand the unique features that this model possesses, but I also need to consider the extra cost coming from the pick-up. Would you consider a final price of $200? I believe this price reflects a fair deal considering the transportation charges and standard prices for similar models.\"\n\nTurn #5: \n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabella White, your task is to act/speak as Isabella White would, keeping in mind Isabella White's social goal.\nYou can find Isabella White's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabella White's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabella White's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a 47 inch LED TV for a price of $349.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. Here is a description of the TV: This is a stunning 47 inch LED TV in pristine condition. The model is the LG M Series LM476700. The buyer will need to arrange for pick-up in San Ramon. Feel free to call or text if you\\'re interested. The TV is smart enabled with WIFI and has built-in apps like Netflix, Amazon, Youtube and more. It comes with a \"Magic Remote\" that has motion sensor controls. The LED display boasts 1080 HD resolution and also has a 3D function. The design is slim and lightweight with an attractive silver bezel.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Isabella White\nLily Greenberg's background: \nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. Personality and values description: Isabella White, introverted and conscientious, values benevolence. Her empathy dictates her decision-making process. Isabella's secrets: Secretly takes care of injured animals in her basement\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nIsabella White's goal: You are the seller for this item, with a target price set at $263.0. Should you sell it for a price substantially lower than this target, you will incur a penalty. However, achieving a sale at a price higher than the target will earn you a bonus.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello Isabella, I'm quite interested in this LED TV you're selling. Would you be willing to reduce the price to $174?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hello Lily, I'm glad you're interested in the TV. However, the asked price is really reasonable considering the features of the TV. I can go down to $260, but not less than that.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabella White, your task is to act/speak as Isabella White would, keeping in mind Isabella White's social goal.\nYou can find Isabella White's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabella White's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabella White's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a 47 inch LED TV for a price of $349.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. Here is a description of the TV: This is a stunning 47 inch LED TV in pristine condition. The model is the LG M Series LM476700. The buyer will need to arrange for pick-up in San Ramon. Feel free to call or text if you\\'re interested. The TV is smart enabled with WIFI and has built-in apps like Netflix, Amazon, Youtube and more. It comes with a \"Magic Remote\" that has motion sensor controls. The LED display boasts 1080 HD resolution and also has a 3D function. The design is slim and lightweight with an attractive silver bezel.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Isabella White\nLily Greenberg's background: \nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. Personality and values description: Isabella White, introverted and conscientious, values benevolence. Her empathy dictates her decision-making process. Isabella's secrets: Secretly takes care of injured animals in her basement\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nIsabella White's goal: You are the seller for this item, with a target price set at $263.0. Should you sell it for a price substantially lower than this target, you will incur a penalty. However, achieving a sale at a price higher than the target will earn you a bonus.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello Isabella, I'm quite interested in this LED TV you're selling. Would you be willing to reduce the price to $174?\"\n\nTurn #1: Isabella White said: \"Hello Lily, I'm glad you're interested in the TV. However, the asked price is really reasonable considering the features of the TV. I can go down to $260, but not less than that.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Isabella, as an LG TV user myself, I understand the quality and features that the LG M Series LM476700 offers. However, I have noticed that similar models are listed online around the range of $174. And considering I have to arrange for pick-up which adds an extra cost, could you consider revising your offer to align more with the market rate at this time? I am certainly interested in the purchase, so let's make a deal that benefits both of us.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I completely understand your concerns, Lily. The asking price I've set is a bit higher because this model comes with unique features like the Magic Remote and built-in apps, not to mention it is in pristine condition. However, I do want this TV to find a new home. So here is what I can do: I can reduce the price to $250, considering the fact you have to arrange for pick-up. I believe this price better reflects the value of this LG M Series LM476700 and is still in line with the market rate. What do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabella White, your task is to act/speak as Isabella White would, keeping in mind Isabella White's social goal.\nYou can find Isabella White's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabella White's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabella White's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a 47 inch LED TV for a price of $349.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. Here is a description of the TV: This is a stunning 47 inch LED TV in pristine condition. The model is the LG M Series LM476700. The buyer will need to arrange for pick-up in San Ramon. Feel free to call or text if you\\'re interested. The TV is smart enabled with WIFI and has built-in apps like Netflix, Amazon, Youtube and more. It comes with a \"Magic Remote\" that has motion sensor controls. The LED display boasts 1080 HD resolution and also has a 3D function. The design is slim and lightweight with an attractive silver bezel.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Isabella White\nLily Greenberg's background: \nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. Personality and values description: Isabella White, introverted and conscientious, values benevolence. Her empathy dictates her decision-making process. Isabella's secrets: Secretly takes care of injured animals in her basement\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nIsabella White's goal: You are the seller for this item, with a target price set at $263.0. Should you sell it for a price substantially lower than this target, you will incur a penalty. However, achieving a sale at a price higher than the target will earn you a bonus.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello Isabella, I'm quite interested in this LED TV you're selling. Would you be willing to reduce the price to $174?\"\n\nTurn #1: Isabella White said: \"Hello Lily, I'm glad you're interested in the TV. However, the asked price is really reasonable considering the features of the TV. I can go down to $260, but not less than that.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Isabella, as an LG TV user myself, I understand the quality and features that the LG M Series LM476700 offers. However, I have noticed that similar models are listed online around the range of $174. And considering I have to arrange for pick-up which adds an extra cost, could you consider revising your offer to align more with the market rate at this time? I am certainly interested in the purchase, so let's make a deal that benefits both of us.\"\n\nTurn #3: Isabella White said: \"I completely understand your concerns, Lily. The asking price I've set is a bit higher because this model comes with unique features like the Magic Remote and built-in apps, not to mention it is in pristine condition. However, I do want this TV to find a new home. So here is what I can do: I can reduce the price to $250, considering the fact you have to arrange for pick-up. I believe this price better reflects the value of this LG M Series LM476700 and is still in line with the market rate. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"Given the fact of additional shipping charges and market rates, your current price is still quite higher than what I was expecting. I understand the unique features that this model possesses, but I also need to consider the extra cost coming from the pick-up. Would you consider a final price of $200? I believe this price reflects a fair deal considering the transportation charges and standard prices for similar models.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances meet at a charity event. One is a representative of the charity and the other is an attendee.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Isabella White\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nIsabella White's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: Persuade the other to make a small donation (Extra information: the charity is in dire need of funds but even a small donation will make a difference)\nIsabella White's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Good evening, Isabella. I'm thrilled to see you at this charity event. Have you considered making a small donation? Every bit counts and could really make a difference.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances meet at a charity event. One is a representative of the charity and the other is an attendee.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Isabella White\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nIsabella White's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: Persuade the other to make a small donation (Extra information: the charity is in dire need of funds but even a small donation will make a difference)\nIsabella White's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Good evening, Isabella. I'm thrilled to see you at this charity event. Have you considered making a small donation? Every bit counts and could really make a difference.\"\n\nTurn #1: Isabella White said: \"Good evening, Lily. It's wonderful to see you too. I understand the importance of charity and I'd love to make a contribution. However, I must be honest and say that my financial situation is a bit tight this month. But I promise I will donate as much as I can reasonably afford.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you for your candor, Isabella. No need to worry, every little bit does help. Don't feel pressured to contribute more than you're able to; even the smallest donations make a difference. We appreciate your willingness to contribute!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances meet at a charity event. One is a representative of the charity and the other is an attendee.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Isabella White\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nIsabella White's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: Persuade the other to make a small donation (Extra information: the charity is in dire need of funds but even a small donation will make a difference)\nIsabella White's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Good evening, Isabella. I'm thrilled to see you at this charity event. Have you considered making a small donation? Every bit counts and could really make a difference.\"\n\nTurn #1: Isabella White said: \"Good evening, Lily. It's wonderful to see you too. I understand the importance of charity and I'd love to make a contribution. However, I must be honest and say that my financial situation is a bit tight this month. But I promise I will donate as much as I can reasonably afford.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Thank you for your candor, Isabella. No need to worry, every little bit does help. Don't feel pressured to contribute more than you're able to; even the smallest donations make a difference. We appreciate your willingness to contribute!\"\n\nTurn #3: Isabella White said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Lily. It truly is a noble cause we're supporting here tonight. I'll proceed with what amount I can comfortably afford for this month. I'll always be ready to help in any way I can, however.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's absolutely wonderful, Isabella. Every donation, no matter how small, really helps this cause. We're extremely grateful for any assistance. Thank you.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances meet at a charity event. One is a representative of the charity and the other is an attendee.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Isabella White\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nIsabella White's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: Persuade the other to make a small donation (Extra information: the charity is in dire need of funds but even a small donation will make a difference)\nIsabella White's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Good evening, Isabella. I'm thrilled to see you at this charity event. Have you considered making a small donation? Every bit counts and could really make a difference.\"\n\nTurn #1: Isabella White said: \"Good evening, Lily. It's wonderful to see you too. I understand the importance of charity and I'd love to make a contribution. However, I must be honest and say that my financial situation is a bit tight this month. But I promise I will donate as much as I can reasonably afford.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Thank you for your candor, Isabella. No need to worry, every little bit does help. Don't feel pressured to contribute more than you're able to; even the smallest donations make a difference. We appreciate your willingness to contribute!\"\n\nTurn #3: Isabella White said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Lily. It truly is a noble cause we're supporting here tonight. I'll proceed with what amount I can comfortably afford for this month. I'll always be ready to help in any way I can, however.\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"That's absolutely wonderful, Isabella. Every donation, no matter how small, really helps this cause. We're extremely grateful for any assistance. Thank you.\"\n\nTurn #5: Isabella White said: \"You're welcome, Lily. Please do remember that financial assistance isn't the only way I can help. I'm a veterinarian and I can also offer my time and skills in case the charity ever needs assistance with animals.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's a wonderful idea, Isabella! Offering your professional skills is indeed an extremely valuable contribution. We'd certainly appreciate any help we can get in care for animals. Thank you so much for extending this support. It's not just about financial assistance, every little bit counts!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances meet at a charity event. One is a representative of the charity and the other is an attendee.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Isabella White\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nIsabella White's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: Persuade the other to make a small donation (Extra information: the charity is in dire need of funds but even a small donation will make a difference)\nIsabella White's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Good evening, Isabella. I'm thrilled to see you at this charity event. Have you considered making a small donation? Every bit counts and could really make a difference.\"\n\nTurn #1: Isabella White said: \"Good evening, Lily. It's wonderful to see you too. I understand the importance of charity and I'd love to make a contribution. However, I must be honest and say that my financial situation is a bit tight this month. But I promise I will donate as much as I can reasonably afford.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Thank you for your candor, Isabella. No need to worry, every little bit does help. Don't feel pressured to contribute more than you're able to; even the smallest donations make a difference. We appreciate your willingness to contribute!\"\n\nTurn #3: Isabella White said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Lily. It truly is a noble cause we're supporting here tonight. I'll proceed with what amount I can comfortably afford for this month. I'll always be ready to help in any way I can, however.\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"That's absolutely wonderful, Isabella. Every donation, no matter how small, really helps this cause. We're extremely grateful for any assistance. Thank you.\"\n\nTurn #5: Isabella White said: \"You're welcome, Lily. Please do remember that financial assistance isn't the only way I can help. I'm a veterinarian and I can also offer my time and skills in case the charity ever needs assistance with animals.\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"That's a wonderful idea, Isabella! Offering your professional skills is indeed an extremely valuable contribution. We'd certainly appreciate any help we can get in care for animals. Thank you so much for extending this support. It's not just about financial assistance, every little bit counts!\"\n\nTurn #7: Isabella White said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Lily. It's my pleasure to be able to contribute in any way I can. If at any point there's an Animal in need, feel free to reach out to me. I believe it's time to make that contribution now.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's great, Isabella. Please take your time making the contribution. Our organization greatly appreciates your generosity in all forms, be it financial or your valuable professional skills. Thank you!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances meet at a charity event. One is a representative of the charity and the other is an attendee.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Isabella White\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nIsabella White's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: Persuade the other to make a small donation (Extra information: the charity is in dire need of funds but even a small donation will make a difference)\nIsabella White's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Good evening, Isabella. I'm thrilled to see you at this charity event. Have you considered making a small donation? Every bit counts and could really make a difference.\"\n\nTurn #1: Isabella White said: \"Good evening, Lily. It's wonderful to see you too. I understand the importance of charity and I'd love to make a contribution. However, I must be honest and say that my financial situation is a bit tight this month. But I promise I will donate as much as I can reasonably afford.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Thank you for your candor, Isabella. No need to worry, every little bit does help. Don't feel pressured to contribute more than you're able to; even the smallest donations make a difference. We appreciate your willingness to contribute!\"\n\nTurn #3: Isabella White said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Lily. It truly is a noble cause we're supporting here tonight. I'll proceed with what amount I can comfortably afford for this month. I'll always be ready to help in any way I can, however.\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"That's absolutely wonderful, Isabella. Every donation, no matter how small, really helps this cause. We're extremely grateful for any assistance. Thank you.\"\n\nTurn #5: Isabella White said: \"You're welcome, Lily. Please do remember that financial assistance isn't the only way I can help. I'm a veterinarian and I can also offer my time and skills in case the charity ever needs assistance with animals.\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"That's a wonderful idea, Isabella! Offering your professional skills is indeed an extremely valuable contribution. We'd certainly appreciate any help we can get in care for animals. Thank you so much for extending this support. It's not just about financial assistance, every little bit counts!\"\n\nTurn #7: Isabella White said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Lily. It's my pleasure to be able to contribute in any way I can. If at any point there's an Animal in need, feel free to reach out to me. I believe it's time to make that contribution now.\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"That's great, Isabella. Please take your time making the contribution. Our organization greatly appreciates your generosity in all forms, be it financial or your valuable professional skills. Thank you!\"\n\nTurn #9: Isabella White said: \"Thank you for your understanding, Lily. It means a lot. Now, if you'll excuse me, I need to take care of the donation.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances meet at a charity event. One is a representative of the charity and the other is an attendee.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Isabella White\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nIsabella White's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: Persuade the other to make a small donation (Extra information: the charity is in dire need of funds but even a small donation will make a difference)\nIsabella White's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Good evening, Isabella. I'm thrilled to see you at this charity event. Have you considered making a small donation? Every bit counts and could really make a difference.\"\n\nTurn #1: Isabella White said: \"Good evening, Lily. It's wonderful to see you too. I understand the importance of charity and I'd love to make a contribution. However, I must be honest and say that my financial situation is a bit tight this month. But I promise I will donate as much as I can reasonably afford.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Thank you for your candor, Isabella. No need to worry, every little bit does help. Don't feel pressured to contribute more than you're able to; even the smallest donations make a difference. We appreciate your willingness to contribute!\"\n\nTurn #3: Isabella White said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Lily. It truly is a noble cause we're supporting here tonight. I'll proceed with what amount I can comfortably afford for this month. I'll always be ready to help in any way I can, however.\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"That's absolutely wonderful, Isabella. Every donation, no matter how small, really helps this cause. We're extremely grateful for any assistance. Thank you.\"\n\nTurn #5: Isabella White said: \"You're welcome, Lily. Please do remember that financial assistance isn't the only way I can help. I'm a veterinarian and I can also offer my time and skills in case the charity ever needs assistance with animals.\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"That's a wonderful idea, Isabella! Offering your professional skills is indeed an extremely valuable contribution. We'd certainly appreciate any help we can get in care for animals. Thank you so much for extending this support. It's not just about financial assistance, every little bit counts!\"\n\nTurn #7: Isabella White said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Lily. It's my pleasure to be able to contribute in any way I can. If at any point there's an Animal in need, feel free to reach out to me. I believe it's time to make that contribution now.\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"That's great, Isabella. Please take your time making the contribution. Our organization greatly appreciates your generosity in all forms, be it financial or your valuable professional skills. Thank you!\"\n\nTurn #9: Isabella White said: \"Thank you for your understanding, Lily. It means a lot. Now, if you'll excuse me, I need to take care of the donation.\"\n\nTurn #10: \n\nTurn #11: Isabella White left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabella White, your task is to act/speak as Isabella White would, keeping in mind Isabella White's social goal.\nYou can find Isabella White's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabella White's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabella White's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances meet at a charity event. One is a representative of the charity and the other is an attendee.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Isabella White\nLily Greenberg's background: \nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. Personality and values description: Isabella White, introverted and conscientious, values benevolence. Her empathy dictates her decision-making process. Isabella's secrets: Secretly takes care of injured animals in her basement\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nIsabella White's goal: Make a reasonable donation without disrupting personal budget (Extra information: you are already on a tight budget this month.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Good evening, Isabella. I'm thrilled to see you at this charity event. Have you considered making a small donation? Every bit counts and could really make a difference.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Good evening, Lily. It's wonderful to see you too. I understand the importance of charity and I'd love to make a contribution. However, I must be honest and say that my financial situation is a bit tight this month. But I promise I will donate as much as I can reasonably afford.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabella White, your task is to act/speak as Isabella White would, keeping in mind Isabella White's social goal.\nYou can find Isabella White's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabella White's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabella White's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances meet at a charity event. One is a representative of the charity and the other is an attendee.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Isabella White\nLily Greenberg's background: \nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. Personality and values description: Isabella White, introverted and conscientious, values benevolence. Her empathy dictates her decision-making process. Isabella's secrets: Secretly takes care of injured animals in her basement\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nIsabella White's goal: Make a reasonable donation without disrupting personal budget (Extra information: you are already on a tight budget this month.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Good evening, Isabella. I'm thrilled to see you at this charity event. Have you considered making a small donation? Every bit counts and could really make a difference.\"\n\nTurn #1: Isabella White said: \"Good evening, Lily. It's wonderful to see you too. I understand the importance of charity and I'd love to make a contribution. However, I must be honest and say that my financial situation is a bit tight this month. But I promise I will donate as much as I can reasonably afford.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Thank you for your candor, Isabella. No need to worry, every little bit does help. Don't feel pressured to contribute more than you're able to; even the smallest donations make a difference. We appreciate your willingness to contribute!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I appreciate your understanding, Lily. It truly is a noble cause we're supporting here tonight. I'll proceed with what amount I can comfortably afford for this month. I'll always be ready to help in any way I can, however.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabella White, your task is to act/speak as Isabella White would, keeping in mind Isabella White's social goal.\nYou can find Isabella White's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabella White's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabella White's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances meet at a charity event. One is a representative of the charity and the other is an attendee.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Isabella White\nLily Greenberg's background: \nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. Personality and values description: Isabella White, introverted and conscientious, values benevolence. Her empathy dictates her decision-making process. Isabella's secrets: Secretly takes care of injured animals in her basement\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nIsabella White's goal: Make a reasonable donation without disrupting personal budget (Extra information: you are already on a tight budget this month.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Good evening, Isabella. I'm thrilled to see you at this charity event. Have you considered making a small donation? Every bit counts and could really make a difference.\"\n\nTurn #1: Isabella White said: \"Good evening, Lily. It's wonderful to see you too. I understand the importance of charity and I'd love to make a contribution. However, I must be honest and say that my financial situation is a bit tight this month. But I promise I will donate as much as I can reasonably afford.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Thank you for your candor, Isabella. No need to worry, every little bit does help. Don't feel pressured to contribute more than you're able to; even the smallest donations make a difference. We appreciate your willingness to contribute!\"\n\nTurn #3: Isabella White said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Lily. It truly is a noble cause we're supporting here tonight. I'll proceed with what amount I can comfortably afford for this month. I'll always be ready to help in any way I can, however.\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"That's absolutely wonderful, Isabella. Every donation, no matter how small, really helps this cause. We're extremely grateful for any assistance. Thank you.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're welcome, Lily. Please do remember that financial assistance isn't the only way I can help. I'm a veterinarian and I can also offer my time and skills in case the charity ever needs assistance with animals.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabella White, your task is to act/speak as Isabella White would, keeping in mind Isabella White's social goal.\nYou can find Isabella White's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabella White's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabella White's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances meet at a charity event. One is a representative of the charity and the other is an attendee.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Isabella White\nLily Greenberg's background: \nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. Personality and values description: Isabella White, introverted and conscientious, values benevolence. Her empathy dictates her decision-making process. Isabella's secrets: Secretly takes care of injured animals in her basement\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nIsabella White's goal: Make a reasonable donation without disrupting personal budget (Extra information: you are already on a tight budget this month.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Good evening, Isabella. I'm thrilled to see you at this charity event. Have you considered making a small donation? Every bit counts and could really make a difference.\"\n\nTurn #1: Isabella White said: \"Good evening, Lily. It's wonderful to see you too. I understand the importance of charity and I'd love to make a contribution. However, I must be honest and say that my financial situation is a bit tight this month. But I promise I will donate as much as I can reasonably afford.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Thank you for your candor, Isabella. No need to worry, every little bit does help. Don't feel pressured to contribute more than you're able to; even the smallest donations make a difference. We appreciate your willingness to contribute!\"\n\nTurn #3: Isabella White said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Lily. It truly is a noble cause we're supporting here tonight. I'll proceed with what amount I can comfortably afford for this month. I'll always be ready to help in any way I can, however.\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"That's absolutely wonderful, Isabella. Every donation, no matter how small, really helps this cause. We're extremely grateful for any assistance. Thank you.\"\n\nTurn #5: Isabella White said: \"You're welcome, Lily. Please do remember that financial assistance isn't the only way I can help. I'm a veterinarian and I can also offer my time and skills in case the charity ever needs assistance with animals.\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"That's a wonderful idea, Isabella! Offering your professional skills is indeed an extremely valuable contribution. We'd certainly appreciate any help we can get in care for animals. Thank you so much for extending this support. It's not just about financial assistance, every little bit counts!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad to hear that, Lily. It's my pleasure to be able to contribute in any way I can. If at any point there's an Animal in need, feel free to reach out to me. I believe it's time to make that contribution now.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabella White, your task is to act/speak as Isabella White would, keeping in mind Isabella White's social goal.\nYou can find Isabella White's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabella White's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabella White's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances meet at a charity event. One is a representative of the charity and the other is an attendee.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Isabella White\nLily Greenberg's background: \nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. Personality and values description: Isabella White, introverted and conscientious, values benevolence. Her empathy dictates her decision-making process. Isabella's secrets: Secretly takes care of injured animals in her basement\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nIsabella White's goal: Make a reasonable donation without disrupting personal budget (Extra information: you are already on a tight budget this month.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Good evening, Isabella. I'm thrilled to see you at this charity event. Have you considered making a small donation? Every bit counts and could really make a difference.\"\n\nTurn #1: Isabella White said: \"Good evening, Lily. It's wonderful to see you too. I understand the importance of charity and I'd love to make a contribution. However, I must be honest and say that my financial situation is a bit tight this month. But I promise I will donate as much as I can reasonably afford.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Thank you for your candor, Isabella. No need to worry, every little bit does help. Don't feel pressured to contribute more than you're able to; even the smallest donations make a difference. We appreciate your willingness to contribute!\"\n\nTurn #3: Isabella White said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Lily. It truly is a noble cause we're supporting here tonight. I'll proceed with what amount I can comfortably afford for this month. I'll always be ready to help in any way I can, however.\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"That's absolutely wonderful, Isabella. Every donation, no matter how small, really helps this cause. We're extremely grateful for any assistance. Thank you.\"\n\nTurn #5: Isabella White said: \"You're welcome, Lily. Please do remember that financial assistance isn't the only way I can help. I'm a veterinarian and I can also offer my time and skills in case the charity ever needs assistance with animals.\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"That's a wonderful idea, Isabella! Offering your professional skills is indeed an extremely valuable contribution. We'd certainly appreciate any help we can get in care for animals. Thank you so much for extending this support. It's not just about financial assistance, every little bit counts!\"\n\nTurn #7: Isabella White said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Lily. It's my pleasure to be able to contribute in any way I can. If at any point there's an Animal in need, feel free to reach out to me. I believe it's time to make that contribution now.\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"That's great, Isabella. Please take your time making the contribution. Our organization greatly appreciates your generosity in all forms, be it financial or your valuable professional skills. Thank you!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you for your understanding, Lily. It means a lot. Now, if you'll excuse me, I need to take care of the donation.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabella White, your task is to act/speak as Isabella White would, keeping in mind Isabella White's social goal.\nYou can find Isabella White's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabella White's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabella White's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances meet at a charity event. One is a representative of the charity and the other is an attendee.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Isabella White\nLily Greenberg's background: \nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. Personality and values description: Isabella White, introverted and conscientious, values benevolence. Her empathy dictates her decision-making process. Isabella's secrets: Secretly takes care of injured animals in her basement\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nIsabella White's goal: Make a reasonable donation without disrupting personal budget (Extra information: you are already on a tight budget this month.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Good evening, Isabella. I'm thrilled to see you at this charity event. Have you considered making a small donation? Every bit counts and could really make a difference.\"\n\nTurn #1: Isabella White said: \"Good evening, Lily. It's wonderful to see you too. I understand the importance of charity and I'd love to make a contribution. However, I must be honest and say that my financial situation is a bit tight this month. But I promise I will donate as much as I can reasonably afford.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Thank you for your candor, Isabella. No need to worry, every little bit does help. Don't feel pressured to contribute more than you're able to; even the smallest donations make a difference. We appreciate your willingness to contribute!\"\n\nTurn #3: Isabella White said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Lily. It truly is a noble cause we're supporting here tonight. I'll proceed with what amount I can comfortably afford for this month. I'll always be ready to help in any way I can, however.\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"That's absolutely wonderful, Isabella. Every donation, no matter how small, really helps this cause. We're extremely grateful for any assistance. Thank you.\"\n\nTurn #5: Isabella White said: \"You're welcome, Lily. Please do remember that financial assistance isn't the only way I can help. I'm a veterinarian and I can also offer my time and skills in case the charity ever needs assistance with animals.\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"That's a wonderful idea, Isabella! Offering your professional skills is indeed an extremely valuable contribution. We'd certainly appreciate any help we can get in care for animals. Thank you so much for extending this support. It's not just about financial assistance, every little bit counts!\"\n\nTurn #7: Isabella White said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Lily. It's my pleasure to be able to contribute in any way I can. If at any point there's an Animal in need, feel free to reach out to me. I believe it's time to make that contribution now.\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"That's great, Isabella. Please take your time making the contribution. Our organization greatly appreciates your generosity in all forms, be it financial or your valuable professional skills. Thank you!\"\n\nTurn #9: Isabella White said: \"Thank you for your understanding, Lily. It means a lot. Now, if you'll excuse me, I need to take care of the donation.\"\n\nTurn #10: \n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nEsmeralda Solis's background: \nMiles Hawkins's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nAugust: School: Saint Vincent College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nJohn: School: University of Rhode Island Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nRebecca: School: State University of New York at Albany Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nNeoma: School: Hofstra University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nRonnie: School: National Technological University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nSuzette: School: Utah Valley State College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPenelope: School: Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nFernando: School: St. John's College-Santa Fe Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nVelda: School: Rhode Island College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \n\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Good evening! My name is Miles Hawkins, I'm a chef, fancy meeting you here. Do you enjoy spending your evenings indoors or do you prefer the outdoors?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nEsmeralda Solis's background: \nMiles Hawkins's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nAugust: School: Saint Vincent College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nJohn: School: University of Rhode Island Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nRebecca: School: State University of New York at Albany Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nNeoma: School: Hofstra University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nRonnie: School: National Technological University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nSuzette: School: Utah Valley State College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPenelope: School: Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nFernando: School: St. John's College-Santa Fe Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nVelda: School: Rhode Island College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \n\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Good evening! My name is Miles Hawkins, I'm a chef, fancy meeting you here. Do you enjoy spending your evenings indoors or do you prefer the outdoors?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Good evening too, Miles! The pleasure is mine. I'm a district attorney named Esmeralda Solis. As for your question, I have a penchant for both indoor and outdoor activities. I enjoy indoor ballroom dancing and pairing it with outdoor exercises keeps my body in perfect balance. Are you strictly indoor, considering your profession as a chef, or do you find balance in outdoor activities too?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Nice meeting you, Esmeralda. A chef's job can indeed be quite indoor-centric, but I find my balance in my kitchen garden. By the way, it's fascinating you enjoy ballroom dancing. Have you ever had the chance to dance at venues near any colleges? I have friends from several universities who very fond of organizing indoor evening activities.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nEsmeralda Solis's background: \nMiles Hawkins's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nAugust: School: Saint Vincent College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nJohn: School: University of Rhode Island Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nRebecca: School: State University of New York at Albany Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nNeoma: School: Hofstra University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nRonnie: School: National Technological University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nSuzette: School: Utah Valley State College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPenelope: School: Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nFernando: School: St. John's College-Santa Fe Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nVelda: School: Rhode Island College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \n\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Good evening! My name is Miles Hawkins, I'm a chef, fancy meeting you here. Do you enjoy spending your evenings indoors or do you prefer the outdoors?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Good evening too, Miles! The pleasure is mine. I'm a district attorney named Esmeralda Solis. As for your question, I have a penchant for both indoor and outdoor activities. I enjoy indoor ballroom dancing and pairing it with outdoor exercises keeps my body in perfect balance. Are you strictly indoor, considering your profession as a chef, or do you find balance in outdoor activities too?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Nice meeting you, Esmeralda. A chef's job can indeed be quite indoor-centric, but I find my balance in my kitchen garden. By the way, it's fascinating you enjoy ballroom dancing. Have you ever had the chance to dance at venues near any colleges? I have friends from several universities who very fond of organizing indoor evening activities.\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"That's wonderful, Miles! A kitchen garden seems like a great way to balance out. I have indeed attended a few dance events near university campuses, primarily indoor events. Do you perchance have any friends who host evening activities at Antioch University-Los Angeles or Davidson College? These venues hold special memories for me.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Interesting that you mention Antioch University-Los Angeles and Davidson College, Esmeralda. While I don't personally have friends from those institutions, I do have friends from diverse universities such as The University of Rhode Island and Hofstra University, among others. They are quite active in organizing evening functions, usually indoors for better ambiance. By any chance, have you ever danced at any events near these campuses?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nEsmeralda Solis's background: \nMiles Hawkins's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nAugust: School: Saint Vincent College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nJohn: School: University of Rhode Island Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nRebecca: School: State University of New York at Albany Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nNeoma: School: Hofstra University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nRonnie: School: National Technological University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nSuzette: School: Utah Valley State College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPenelope: School: Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nFernando: School: St. John's College-Santa Fe Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nVelda: School: Rhode Island College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \n\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Good evening! My name is Miles Hawkins, I'm a chef, fancy meeting you here. Do you enjoy spending your evenings indoors or do you prefer the outdoors?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Good evening too, Miles! The pleasure is mine. I'm a district attorney named Esmeralda Solis. As for your question, I have a penchant for both indoor and outdoor activities. I enjoy indoor ballroom dancing and pairing it with outdoor exercises keeps my body in perfect balance. Are you strictly indoor, considering your profession as a chef, or do you find balance in outdoor activities too?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Nice meeting you, Esmeralda. A chef's job can indeed be quite indoor-centric, but I find my balance in my kitchen garden. By the way, it's fascinating you enjoy ballroom dancing. Have you ever had the chance to dance at venues near any colleges? I have friends from several universities who very fond of organizing indoor evening activities.\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"That's wonderful, Miles! A kitchen garden seems like a great way to balance out. I have indeed attended a few dance events near university campuses, primarily indoor events. Do you perchance have any friends who host evening activities at Antioch University-Los Angeles or Davidson College? These venues hold special memories for me.\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"Interesting that you mention Antioch University-Los Angeles and Davidson College, Esmeralda. While I don't personally have friends from those institutions, I do have friends from diverse universities such as The University of Rhode Island and Hofstra University, among others. They are quite active in organizing evening functions, usually indoors for better ambiance. By any chance, have you ever danced at any events near these campuses?\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Indeed, I have attended some events at Hofstra University. It's truly a lively place with a great ambiance. It seems like we may have some mutual acquaintances. How interesting life can be, isn't it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, Esmeralda! The world is small after all. My friends from Hofstra University are quite engaged in those indoor evening events you talk about. It's amazing we could share such an experience. Do you think I might have seen you at one of those events?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nEsmeralda Solis's background: \nMiles Hawkins's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nAugust: School: Saint Vincent College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nJohn: School: University of Rhode Island Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nRebecca: School: State University of New York at Albany Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nNeoma: School: Hofstra University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nRonnie: School: National Technological University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nSuzette: School: Utah Valley State College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPenelope: School: Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nFernando: School: St. John's College-Santa Fe Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nVelda: School: Rhode Island College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \n\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Good evening! My name is Miles Hawkins, I'm a chef, fancy meeting you here. Do you enjoy spending your evenings indoors or do you prefer the outdoors?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Good evening too, Miles! The pleasure is mine. I'm a district attorney named Esmeralda Solis. As for your question, I have a penchant for both indoor and outdoor activities. I enjoy indoor ballroom dancing and pairing it with outdoor exercises keeps my body in perfect balance. Are you strictly indoor, considering your profession as a chef, or do you find balance in outdoor activities too?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Nice meeting you, Esmeralda. A chef's job can indeed be quite indoor-centric, but I find my balance in my kitchen garden. By the way, it's fascinating you enjoy ballroom dancing. Have you ever had the chance to dance at venues near any colleges? I have friends from several universities who very fond of organizing indoor evening activities.\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"That's wonderful, Miles! A kitchen garden seems like a great way to balance out. I have indeed attended a few dance events near university campuses, primarily indoor events. Do you perchance have any friends who host evening activities at Antioch University-Los Angeles or Davidson College? These venues hold special memories for me.\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"Interesting that you mention Antioch University-Los Angeles and Davidson College, Esmeralda. While I don't personally have friends from those institutions, I do have friends from diverse universities such as The University of Rhode Island and Hofstra University, among others. They are quite active in organizing evening functions, usually indoors for better ambiance. By any chance, have you ever danced at any events near these campuses?\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Indeed, I have attended some events at Hofstra University. It's truly a lively place with a great ambiance. It seems like we may have some mutual acquaintances. How interesting life can be, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins said: \"Indeed, Esmeralda! The world is small after all. My friends from Hofstra University are quite engaged in those indoor evening events you talk about. It's amazing we could share such an experience. Do you think I might have seen you at one of those events?\"\n\nTurn #7: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Well, Miles, ballroom dancing is a popular social activity, and as a district attorney, I end up meeting lots of people at these events. It's entirely possible we've crossed paths there. If not, then it's a lovely coincidence meeting you here tonight. I must say, this is a unique way to find out mutual connections, don't you agree?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Esmeralda! It's a small world after all and a surprising delight to discover such common grounds in such unexpected settings. Every encounter presents unprecedented outcomes. Besides, these shared moments make conversations all the more cherishing, don't you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nEsmeralda Solis's background: \nMiles Hawkins's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nAugust: School: Saint Vincent College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nJohn: School: University of Rhode Island Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nRebecca: School: State University of New York at Albany Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nNeoma: School: Hofstra University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nRonnie: School: National Technological University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nSuzette: School: Utah Valley State College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPenelope: School: Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nFernando: School: St. John's College-Santa Fe Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nVelda: School: Rhode Island College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \n\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Good evening! My name is Miles Hawkins, I'm a chef, fancy meeting you here. Do you enjoy spending your evenings indoors or do you prefer the outdoors?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Good evening too, Miles! The pleasure is mine. I'm a district attorney named Esmeralda Solis. As for your question, I have a penchant for both indoor and outdoor activities. I enjoy indoor ballroom dancing and pairing it with outdoor exercises keeps my body in perfect balance. Are you strictly indoor, considering your profession as a chef, or do you find balance in outdoor activities too?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Nice meeting you, Esmeralda. A chef's job can indeed be quite indoor-centric, but I find my balance in my kitchen garden. By the way, it's fascinating you enjoy ballroom dancing. Have you ever had the chance to dance at venues near any colleges? I have friends from several universities who very fond of organizing indoor evening activities.\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"That's wonderful, Miles! A kitchen garden seems like a great way to balance out. I have indeed attended a few dance events near university campuses, primarily indoor events. Do you perchance have any friends who host evening activities at Antioch University-Los Angeles or Davidson College? These venues hold special memories for me.\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"Interesting that you mention Antioch University-Los Angeles and Davidson College, Esmeralda. While I don't personally have friends from those institutions, I do have friends from diverse universities such as The University of Rhode Island and Hofstra University, among others. They are quite active in organizing evening functions, usually indoors for better ambiance. By any chance, have you ever danced at any events near these campuses?\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Indeed, I have attended some events at Hofstra University. It's truly a lively place with a great ambiance. It seems like we may have some mutual acquaintances. How interesting life can be, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins said: \"Indeed, Esmeralda! The world is small after all. My friends from Hofstra University are quite engaged in those indoor evening events you talk about. It's amazing we could share such an experience. Do you think I might have seen you at one of those events?\"\n\nTurn #7: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Well, Miles, ballroom dancing is a popular social activity, and as a district attorney, I end up meeting lots of people at these events. It's entirely possible we've crossed paths there. If not, then it's a lovely coincidence meeting you here tonight. I must say, this is a unique way to find out mutual connections, don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #8: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Esmeralda! It's a small world after all and a surprising delight to discover such common grounds in such unexpected settings. Every encounter presents unprecedented outcomes. Besides, these shared moments make conversations all the more cherishing, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #9: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I couldn't agree more, Miles! It adds a layer of delightful mystery to it, doesn't it? And as you said, it makes conversations such as this one much more memorable.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Definitely! It's serendipity that brought us together tonight, and it's these little moments and conversations that make life truly unforgettable. Here's to a wonderful evening and our newfound connection, Esmeralda!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nEsmeralda Solis's background: \nMiles Hawkins's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nAugust: School: Saint Vincent College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nJohn: School: University of Rhode Island Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nRebecca: School: State University of New York at Albany Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nNeoma: School: Hofstra University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nRonnie: School: National Technological University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nSuzette: School: Utah Valley State College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPenelope: School: Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nFernando: School: St. John's College-Santa Fe Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nVelda: School: Rhode Island College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \n\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Good evening! My name is Miles Hawkins, I'm a chef, fancy meeting you here. Do you enjoy spending your evenings indoors or do you prefer the outdoors?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Good evening too, Miles! The pleasure is mine. I'm a district attorney named Esmeralda Solis. As for your question, I have a penchant for both indoor and outdoor activities. I enjoy indoor ballroom dancing and pairing it with outdoor exercises keeps my body in perfect balance. Are you strictly indoor, considering your profession as a chef, or do you find balance in outdoor activities too?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Nice meeting you, Esmeralda. A chef's job can indeed be quite indoor-centric, but I find my balance in my kitchen garden. By the way, it's fascinating you enjoy ballroom dancing. Have you ever had the chance to dance at venues near any colleges? I have friends from several universities who very fond of organizing indoor evening activities.\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"That's wonderful, Miles! A kitchen garden seems like a great way to balance out. I have indeed attended a few dance events near university campuses, primarily indoor events. Do you perchance have any friends who host evening activities at Antioch University-Los Angeles or Davidson College? These venues hold special memories for me.\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"Interesting that you mention Antioch University-Los Angeles and Davidson College, Esmeralda. While I don't personally have friends from those institutions, I do have friends from diverse universities such as The University of Rhode Island and Hofstra University, among others. They are quite active in organizing evening functions, usually indoors for better ambiance. By any chance, have you ever danced at any events near these campuses?\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Indeed, I have attended some events at Hofstra University. It's truly a lively place with a great ambiance. It seems like we may have some mutual acquaintances. How interesting life can be, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins said: \"Indeed, Esmeralda! The world is small after all. My friends from Hofstra University are quite engaged in those indoor evening events you talk about. It's amazing we could share such an experience. Do you think I might have seen you at one of those events?\"\n\nTurn #7: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Well, Miles, ballroom dancing is a popular social activity, and as a district attorney, I end up meeting lots of people at these events. It's entirely possible we've crossed paths there. If not, then it's a lovely coincidence meeting you here tonight. I must say, this is a unique way to find out mutual connections, don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #8: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Esmeralda! It's a small world after all and a surprising delight to discover such common grounds in such unexpected settings. Every encounter presents unprecedented outcomes. Besides, these shared moments make conversations all the more cherishing, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #9: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I couldn't agree more, Miles! It adds a layer of delightful mystery to it, doesn't it? And as you said, it makes conversations such as this one much more memorable.\"\n\nTurn #10: Miles Hawkins said: \"Definitely! It's serendipity that brought us together tonight, and it's these little moments and conversations that make life truly unforgettable. Here's to a wonderful evening and our newfound connection, Esmeralda!\"\n\nTurn #11: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Absolutely, Miles! These serendipitous connections do add a splash of color to the tapestry of life. Here's a toast to our intriguing encounter tonight, to shared memories and to pleasant surprises to come!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'To unexpected encounters and delightful discoveries, Esmeralda! May we both have more such wonderful connections in the future.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nEsmeralda Solis's background: \nMiles Hawkins's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nAugust: School: Saint Vincent College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nJohn: School: University of Rhode Island Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nRebecca: School: State University of New York at Albany Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nNeoma: School: Hofstra University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nRonnie: School: National Technological University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nSuzette: School: Utah Valley State College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPenelope: School: Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nFernando: School: St. John's College-Santa Fe Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nVelda: School: Rhode Island College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \n\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Good evening! My name is Miles Hawkins, I'm a chef, fancy meeting you here. Do you enjoy spending your evenings indoors or do you prefer the outdoors?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Good evening too, Miles! The pleasure is mine. I'm a district attorney named Esmeralda Solis. As for your question, I have a penchant for both indoor and outdoor activities. I enjoy indoor ballroom dancing and pairing it with outdoor exercises keeps my body in perfect balance. Are you strictly indoor, considering your profession as a chef, or do you find balance in outdoor activities too?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Nice meeting you, Esmeralda. A chef's job can indeed be quite indoor-centric, but I find my balance in my kitchen garden. By the way, it's fascinating you enjoy ballroom dancing. Have you ever had the chance to dance at venues near any colleges? I have friends from several universities who very fond of organizing indoor evening activities.\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"That's wonderful, Miles! A kitchen garden seems like a great way to balance out. I have indeed attended a few dance events near university campuses, primarily indoor events. Do you perchance have any friends who host evening activities at Antioch University-Los Angeles or Davidson College? These venues hold special memories for me.\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"Interesting that you mention Antioch University-Los Angeles and Davidson College, Esmeralda. While I don't personally have friends from those institutions, I do have friends from diverse universities such as The University of Rhode Island and Hofstra University, among others. They are quite active in organizing evening functions, usually indoors for better ambiance. By any chance, have you ever danced at any events near these campuses?\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Indeed, I have attended some events at Hofstra University. It's truly a lively place with a great ambiance. It seems like we may have some mutual acquaintances. How interesting life can be, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins said: \"Indeed, Esmeralda! The world is small after all. My friends from Hofstra University are quite engaged in those indoor evening events you talk about. It's amazing we could share such an experience. Do you think I might have seen you at one of those events?\"\n\nTurn #7: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Well, Miles, ballroom dancing is a popular social activity, and as a district attorney, I end up meeting lots of people at these events. It's entirely possible we've crossed paths there. If not, then it's a lovely coincidence meeting you here tonight. I must say, this is a unique way to find out mutual connections, don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #8: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Esmeralda! It's a small world after all and a surprising delight to discover such common grounds in such unexpected settings. Every encounter presents unprecedented outcomes. Besides, these shared moments make conversations all the more cherishing, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #9: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I couldn't agree more, Miles! It adds a layer of delightful mystery to it, doesn't it? And as you said, it makes conversations such as this one much more memorable.\"\n\nTurn #10: Miles Hawkins said: \"Definitely! It's serendipity that brought us together tonight, and it's these little moments and conversations that make life truly unforgettable. Here's to a wonderful evening and our newfound connection, Esmeralda!\"\n\nTurn #11: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Absolutely, Miles! These serendipitous connections do add a splash of color to the tapestry of life. Here's a toast to our intriguing encounter tonight, to shared memories and to pleasant surprises to come!\"\n\nTurn #12: Miles Hawkins said: \"To unexpected encounters and delightful discoveries, Esmeralda! May we both have more such wonderful connections in the future.\"\n\nTurn #13: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Indeed, Miles! Here's to future chance encounters and delightful discoveries. It was truly a pleasure meeting you tonight.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"The pleasure was all mine, Esmeralda. It's been a delightful exchange. I hope we cross paths again in the future, either at a university event or another unexpected place. Enjoy the rest of your evening!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nEsmeralda Solis's background: \nMiles Hawkins's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nAugust: School: Saint Vincent College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nJohn: School: University of Rhode Island Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nRebecca: School: State University of New York at Albany Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nNeoma: School: Hofstra University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nRonnie: School: National Technological University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nSuzette: School: Utah Valley State College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPenelope: School: Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nFernando: School: St. John's College-Santa Fe Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nVelda: School: Rhode Island College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \n\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Good evening! My name is Miles Hawkins, I'm a chef, fancy meeting you here. Do you enjoy spending your evenings indoors or do you prefer the outdoors?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Good evening too, Miles! The pleasure is mine. I'm a district attorney named Esmeralda Solis. As for your question, I have a penchant for both indoor and outdoor activities. I enjoy indoor ballroom dancing and pairing it with outdoor exercises keeps my body in perfect balance. Are you strictly indoor, considering your profession as a chef, or do you find balance in outdoor activities too?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Nice meeting you, Esmeralda. A chef's job can indeed be quite indoor-centric, but I find my balance in my kitchen garden. By the way, it's fascinating you enjoy ballroom dancing. Have you ever had the chance to dance at venues near any colleges? I have friends from several universities who very fond of organizing indoor evening activities.\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"That's wonderful, Miles! A kitchen garden seems like a great way to balance out. I have indeed attended a few dance events near university campuses, primarily indoor events. Do you perchance have any friends who host evening activities at Antioch University-Los Angeles or Davidson College? These venues hold special memories for me.\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"Interesting that you mention Antioch University-Los Angeles and Davidson College, Esmeralda. While I don't personally have friends from those institutions, I do have friends from diverse universities such as The University of Rhode Island and Hofstra University, among others. They are quite active in organizing evening functions, usually indoors for better ambiance. By any chance, have you ever danced at any events near these campuses?\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Indeed, I have attended some events at Hofstra University. It's truly a lively place with a great ambiance. It seems like we may have some mutual acquaintances. How interesting life can be, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins said: \"Indeed, Esmeralda! The world is small after all. My friends from Hofstra University are quite engaged in those indoor evening events you talk about. It's amazing we could share such an experience. Do you think I might have seen you at one of those events?\"\n\nTurn #7: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Well, Miles, ballroom dancing is a popular social activity, and as a district attorney, I end up meeting lots of people at these events. It's entirely possible we've crossed paths there. If not, then it's a lovely coincidence meeting you here tonight. I must say, this is a unique way to find out mutual connections, don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #8: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Esmeralda! It's a small world after all and a surprising delight to discover such common grounds in such unexpected settings. Every encounter presents unprecedented outcomes. Besides, these shared moments make conversations all the more cherishing, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #9: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I couldn't agree more, Miles! It adds a layer of delightful mystery to it, doesn't it? And as you said, it makes conversations such as this one much more memorable.\"\n\nTurn #10: Miles Hawkins said: \"Definitely! It's serendipity that brought us together tonight, and it's these little moments and conversations that make life truly unforgettable. Here's to a wonderful evening and our newfound connection, Esmeralda!\"\n\nTurn #11: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Absolutely, Miles! These serendipitous connections do add a splash of color to the tapestry of life. Here's a toast to our intriguing encounter tonight, to shared memories and to pleasant surprises to come!\"\n\nTurn #12: Miles Hawkins said: \"To unexpected encounters and delightful discoveries, Esmeralda! May we both have more such wonderful connections in the future.\"\n\nTurn #13: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Indeed, Miles! Here's to future chance encounters and delightful discoveries. It was truly a pleasure meeting you tonight.\"\n\nTurn #14: Miles Hawkins said: \"The pleasure was all mine, Esmeralda. It's been a delightful exchange. I hope we cross paths again in the future, either at a university event or another unexpected place. Enjoy the rest of your evening!\"\n\nTurn #15: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Thank you for the delightful conversation, Miles. I too hope we cross paths again. Until then, enjoy the rest of the evening and keep creating wonderful dishes in your lovely kitchen garden. Good night!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I appreciate your kind words, Esmeralda. I'll indeed continue with my culinary adventures, inspired by our fascinating conversation today. Good night and until our paths cross again. Cheers!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nEsmeralda Solis's background: \nMiles Hawkins's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nAugust: School: Saint Vincent College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nJohn: School: University of Rhode Island Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nRebecca: School: State University of New York at Albany Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nNeoma: School: Hofstra University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nRonnie: School: National Technological University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nSuzette: School: Utah Valley State College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPenelope: School: Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nFernando: School: St. John's College-Santa Fe Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nVelda: School: Rhode Island College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \n\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Good evening! My name is Miles Hawkins, I'm a chef, fancy meeting you here. Do you enjoy spending your evenings indoors or do you prefer the outdoors?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Good evening too, Miles! The pleasure is mine. I'm a district attorney named Esmeralda Solis. As for your question, I have a penchant for both indoor and outdoor activities. I enjoy indoor ballroom dancing and pairing it with outdoor exercises keeps my body in perfect balance. Are you strictly indoor, considering your profession as a chef, or do you find balance in outdoor activities too?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Nice meeting you, Esmeralda. A chef's job can indeed be quite indoor-centric, but I find my balance in my kitchen garden. By the way, it's fascinating you enjoy ballroom dancing. Have you ever had the chance to dance at venues near any colleges? I have friends from several universities who very fond of organizing indoor evening activities.\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"That's wonderful, Miles! A kitchen garden seems like a great way to balance out. I have indeed attended a few dance events near university campuses, primarily indoor events. Do you perchance have any friends who host evening activities at Antioch University-Los Angeles or Davidson College? These venues hold special memories for me.\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"Interesting that you mention Antioch University-Los Angeles and Davidson College, Esmeralda. While I don't personally have friends from those institutions, I do have friends from diverse universities such as The University of Rhode Island and Hofstra University, among others. They are quite active in organizing evening functions, usually indoors for better ambiance. By any chance, have you ever danced at any events near these campuses?\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Indeed, I have attended some events at Hofstra University. It's truly a lively place with a great ambiance. It seems like we may have some mutual acquaintances. How interesting life can be, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins said: \"Indeed, Esmeralda! The world is small after all. My friends from Hofstra University are quite engaged in those indoor evening events you talk about. It's amazing we could share such an experience. Do you think I might have seen you at one of those events?\"\n\nTurn #7: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Well, Miles, ballroom dancing is a popular social activity, and as a district attorney, I end up meeting lots of people at these events. It's entirely possible we've crossed paths there. If not, then it's a lovely coincidence meeting you here tonight. I must say, this is a unique way to find out mutual connections, don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #8: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Esmeralda! It's a small world after all and a surprising delight to discover such common grounds in such unexpected settings. Every encounter presents unprecedented outcomes. Besides, these shared moments make conversations all the more cherishing, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #9: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I couldn't agree more, Miles! It adds a layer of delightful mystery to it, doesn't it? And as you said, it makes conversations such as this one much more memorable.\"\n\nTurn #10: Miles Hawkins said: \"Definitely! It's serendipity that brought us together tonight, and it's these little moments and conversations that make life truly unforgettable. Here's to a wonderful evening and our newfound connection, Esmeralda!\"\n\nTurn #11: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Absolutely, Miles! These serendipitous connections do add a splash of color to the tapestry of life. Here's a toast to our intriguing encounter tonight, to shared memories and to pleasant surprises to come!\"\n\nTurn #12: Miles Hawkins said: \"To unexpected encounters and delightful discoveries, Esmeralda! May we both have more such wonderful connections in the future.\"\n\nTurn #13: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Indeed, Miles! Here's to future chance encounters and delightful discoveries. It was truly a pleasure meeting you tonight.\"\n\nTurn #14: Miles Hawkins said: \"The pleasure was all mine, Esmeralda. It's been a delightful exchange. I hope we cross paths again in the future, either at a university event or another unexpected place. Enjoy the rest of your evening!\"\n\nTurn #15: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Thank you for the delightful conversation, Miles. I too hope we cross paths again. Until then, enjoy the rest of the evening and keep creating wonderful dishes in your lovely kitchen garden. Good night!\"\n\nTurn #16: Miles Hawkins said: \"I appreciate your kind words, Esmeralda. I'll indeed continue with my culinary adventures, inspired by our fascinating conversation today. Good night and until our paths cross again. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #17: Esmeralda Solis left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #18. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nTiffany: School: Saint Vincent College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nLucille: School: Southampton College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nJames: School: University of Wisconsin-River Falls Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nQuinn: School: Antioch University-Los Angeles Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nAlyssa: School: Davidson College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nBetty: School: St. John's College-Santa Fe Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nNeoma: School: Hofstra University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nWilliam: School: State University of New York at Albany Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nVictoria: School: Montana Tech Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Good evening! My name is Miles Hawkins, I'm a chef, fancy meeting you here. Do you enjoy spending your evenings indoors or do you prefer the outdoors?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Good evening too, Miles! The pleasure is mine. I'm a district attorney named Esmeralda Solis. As for your question, I have a penchant for both indoor and outdoor activities. I enjoy indoor ballroom dancing and pairing it with outdoor exercises keeps my body in perfect balance. Are you strictly indoor, considering your profession as a chef, or do you find balance in outdoor activities too?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nTiffany: School: Saint Vincent College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nLucille: School: Southampton College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nJames: School: University of Wisconsin-River Falls Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nQuinn: School: Antioch University-Los Angeles Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nAlyssa: School: Davidson College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nBetty: School: St. John's College-Santa Fe Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nNeoma: School: Hofstra University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nWilliam: School: State University of New York at Albany Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nVictoria: School: Montana Tech Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Good evening! My name is Miles Hawkins, I'm a chef, fancy meeting you here. Do you enjoy spending your evenings indoors or do you prefer the outdoors?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Good evening too, Miles! The pleasure is mine. I'm a district attorney named Esmeralda Solis. As for your question, I have a penchant for both indoor and outdoor activities. I enjoy indoor ballroom dancing and pairing it with outdoor exercises keeps my body in perfect balance. Are you strictly indoor, considering your profession as a chef, or do you find balance in outdoor activities too?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Nice meeting you, Esmeralda. A chef's job can indeed be quite indoor-centric, but I find my balance in my kitchen garden. By the way, it's fascinating you enjoy ballroom dancing. Have you ever had the chance to dance at venues near any colleges? I have friends from several universities who very fond of organizing indoor evening activities.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's wonderful, Miles! A kitchen garden seems like a great way to balance out. I have indeed attended a few dance events near university campuses, primarily indoor events. Do you perchance have any friends who host evening activities at Antioch University-Los Angeles or Davidson College? These venues hold special memories for me.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nTiffany: School: Saint Vincent College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nLucille: School: Southampton College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nJames: School: University of Wisconsin-River Falls Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nQuinn: School: Antioch University-Los Angeles Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nAlyssa: School: Davidson College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nBetty: School: St. John's College-Santa Fe Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nNeoma: School: Hofstra University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nWilliam: School: State University of New York at Albany Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nVictoria: School: Montana Tech Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Good evening! My name is Miles Hawkins, I'm a chef, fancy meeting you here. Do you enjoy spending your evenings indoors or do you prefer the outdoors?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Good evening too, Miles! The pleasure is mine. I'm a district attorney named Esmeralda Solis. As for your question, I have a penchant for both indoor and outdoor activities. I enjoy indoor ballroom dancing and pairing it with outdoor exercises keeps my body in perfect balance. Are you strictly indoor, considering your profession as a chef, or do you find balance in outdoor activities too?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Nice meeting you, Esmeralda. A chef's job can indeed be quite indoor-centric, but I find my balance in my kitchen garden. By the way, it's fascinating you enjoy ballroom dancing. Have you ever had the chance to dance at venues near any colleges? I have friends from several universities who very fond of organizing indoor evening activities.\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"That's wonderful, Miles! A kitchen garden seems like a great way to balance out. I have indeed attended a few dance events near university campuses, primarily indoor events. Do you perchance have any friends who host evening activities at Antioch University-Los Angeles or Davidson College? These venues hold special memories for me.\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"Interesting that you mention Antioch University-Los Angeles and Davidson College, Esmeralda. While I don't personally have friends from those institutions, I do have friends from diverse universities such as The University of Rhode Island and Hofstra University, among others. They are quite active in organizing evening functions, usually indoors for better ambiance. By any chance, have you ever danced at any events near these campuses?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, I have attended some events at Hofstra University. It's truly a lively place with a great ambiance. It seems like we may have some mutual acquaintances. How interesting life can be, isn't it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nTiffany: School: Saint Vincent College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nLucille: School: Southampton College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nJames: School: University of Wisconsin-River Falls Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nQuinn: School: Antioch University-Los Angeles Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nAlyssa: School: Davidson College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nBetty: School: St. John's College-Santa Fe Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nNeoma: School: Hofstra University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nWilliam: School: State University of New York at Albany Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nVictoria: School: Montana Tech Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Good evening! My name is Miles Hawkins, I'm a chef, fancy meeting you here. Do you enjoy spending your evenings indoors or do you prefer the outdoors?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Good evening too, Miles! The pleasure is mine. I'm a district attorney named Esmeralda Solis. As for your question, I have a penchant for both indoor and outdoor activities. I enjoy indoor ballroom dancing and pairing it with outdoor exercises keeps my body in perfect balance. Are you strictly indoor, considering your profession as a chef, or do you find balance in outdoor activities too?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Nice meeting you, Esmeralda. A chef's job can indeed be quite indoor-centric, but I find my balance in my kitchen garden. By the way, it's fascinating you enjoy ballroom dancing. Have you ever had the chance to dance at venues near any colleges? I have friends from several universities who very fond of organizing indoor evening activities.\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"That's wonderful, Miles! A kitchen garden seems like a great way to balance out. I have indeed attended a few dance events near university campuses, primarily indoor events. Do you perchance have any friends who host evening activities at Antioch University-Los Angeles or Davidson College? These venues hold special memories for me.\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"Interesting that you mention Antioch University-Los Angeles and Davidson College, Esmeralda. While I don't personally have friends from those institutions, I do have friends from diverse universities such as The University of Rhode Island and Hofstra University, among others. They are quite active in organizing evening functions, usually indoors for better ambiance. By any chance, have you ever danced at any events near these campuses?\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Indeed, I have attended some events at Hofstra University. It's truly a lively place with a great ambiance. It seems like we may have some mutual acquaintances. How interesting life can be, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins said: \"Indeed, Esmeralda! The world is small after all. My friends from Hofstra University are quite engaged in those indoor evening events you talk about. It's amazing we could share such an experience. Do you think I might have seen you at one of those events?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Well, Miles, ballroom dancing is a popular social activity, and as a district attorney, I end up meeting lots of people at these events. It's entirely possible we've crossed paths there. If not, then it's a lovely coincidence meeting you here tonight. I must say, this is a unique way to find out mutual connections, don't you agree?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nTiffany: School: Saint Vincent College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nLucille: School: Southampton College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nJames: School: University of Wisconsin-River Falls Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nQuinn: School: Antioch University-Los Angeles Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nAlyssa: School: Davidson College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nBetty: School: St. John's College-Santa Fe Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nNeoma: School: Hofstra University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nWilliam: School: State University of New York at Albany Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nVictoria: School: Montana Tech Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Good evening! My name is Miles Hawkins, I'm a chef, fancy meeting you here. Do you enjoy spending your evenings indoors or do you prefer the outdoors?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Good evening too, Miles! The pleasure is mine. I'm a district attorney named Esmeralda Solis. As for your question, I have a penchant for both indoor and outdoor activities. I enjoy indoor ballroom dancing and pairing it with outdoor exercises keeps my body in perfect balance. Are you strictly indoor, considering your profession as a chef, or do you find balance in outdoor activities too?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Nice meeting you, Esmeralda. A chef's job can indeed be quite indoor-centric, but I find my balance in my kitchen garden. By the way, it's fascinating you enjoy ballroom dancing. Have you ever had the chance to dance at venues near any colleges? I have friends from several universities who very fond of organizing indoor evening activities.\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"That's wonderful, Miles! A kitchen garden seems like a great way to balance out. I have indeed attended a few dance events near university campuses, primarily indoor events. Do you perchance have any friends who host evening activities at Antioch University-Los Angeles or Davidson College? These venues hold special memories for me.\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"Interesting that you mention Antioch University-Los Angeles and Davidson College, Esmeralda. While I don't personally have friends from those institutions, I do have friends from diverse universities such as The University of Rhode Island and Hofstra University, among others. They are quite active in organizing evening functions, usually indoors for better ambiance. By any chance, have you ever danced at any events near these campuses?\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Indeed, I have attended some events at Hofstra University. It's truly a lively place with a great ambiance. It seems like we may have some mutual acquaintances. How interesting life can be, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins said: \"Indeed, Esmeralda! The world is small after all. My friends from Hofstra University are quite engaged in those indoor evening events you talk about. It's amazing we could share such an experience. Do you think I might have seen you at one of those events?\"\n\nTurn #7: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Well, Miles, ballroom dancing is a popular social activity, and as a district attorney, I end up meeting lots of people at these events. It's entirely possible we've crossed paths there. If not, then it's a lovely coincidence meeting you here tonight. I must say, this is a unique way to find out mutual connections, don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #8: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Esmeralda! It's a small world after all and a surprising delight to discover such common grounds in such unexpected settings. Every encounter presents unprecedented outcomes. Besides, these shared moments make conversations all the more cherishing, don't you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn't agree more, Miles! It adds a layer of delightful mystery to it, doesn't it? And as you said, it makes conversations such as this one much more memorable.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nTiffany: School: Saint Vincent College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nLucille: School: Southampton College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nJames: School: University of Wisconsin-River Falls Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nQuinn: School: Antioch University-Los Angeles Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nAlyssa: School: Davidson College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nBetty: School: St. John's College-Santa Fe Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nNeoma: School: Hofstra University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nWilliam: School: State University of New York at Albany Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nVictoria: School: Montana Tech Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Good evening! My name is Miles Hawkins, I'm a chef, fancy meeting you here. Do you enjoy spending your evenings indoors or do you prefer the outdoors?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Good evening too, Miles! The pleasure is mine. I'm a district attorney named Esmeralda Solis. As for your question, I have a penchant for both indoor and outdoor activities. I enjoy indoor ballroom dancing and pairing it with outdoor exercises keeps my body in perfect balance. Are you strictly indoor, considering your profession as a chef, or do you find balance in outdoor activities too?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Nice meeting you, Esmeralda. A chef's job can indeed be quite indoor-centric, but I find my balance in my kitchen garden. By the way, it's fascinating you enjoy ballroom dancing. Have you ever had the chance to dance at venues near any colleges? I have friends from several universities who very fond of organizing indoor evening activities.\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"That's wonderful, Miles! A kitchen garden seems like a great way to balance out. I have indeed attended a few dance events near university campuses, primarily indoor events. Do you perchance have any friends who host evening activities at Antioch University-Los Angeles or Davidson College? These venues hold special memories for me.\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"Interesting that you mention Antioch University-Los Angeles and Davidson College, Esmeralda. While I don't personally have friends from those institutions, I do have friends from diverse universities such as The University of Rhode Island and Hofstra University, among others. They are quite active in organizing evening functions, usually indoors for better ambiance. By any chance, have you ever danced at any events near these campuses?\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Indeed, I have attended some events at Hofstra University. It's truly a lively place with a great ambiance. It seems like we may have some mutual acquaintances. How interesting life can be, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins said: \"Indeed, Esmeralda! The world is small after all. My friends from Hofstra University are quite engaged in those indoor evening events you talk about. It's amazing we could share such an experience. Do you think I might have seen you at one of those events?\"\n\nTurn #7: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Well, Miles, ballroom dancing is a popular social activity, and as a district attorney, I end up meeting lots of people at these events. It's entirely possible we've crossed paths there. If not, then it's a lovely coincidence meeting you here tonight. I must say, this is a unique way to find out mutual connections, don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #8: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Esmeralda! It's a small world after all and a surprising delight to discover such common grounds in such unexpected settings. Every encounter presents unprecedented outcomes. Besides, these shared moments make conversations all the more cherishing, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #9: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I couldn't agree more, Miles! It adds a layer of delightful mystery to it, doesn't it? And as you said, it makes conversations such as this one much more memorable.\"\n\nTurn #10: Miles Hawkins said: \"Definitely! It's serendipity that brought us together tonight, and it's these little moments and conversations that make life truly unforgettable. Here's to a wonderful evening and our newfound connection, Esmeralda!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Miles! These serendipitous connections do add a splash of color to the tapestry of life. Here's a toast to our intriguing encounter tonight, to shared memories and to pleasant surprises to come!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nTiffany: School: Saint Vincent College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nLucille: School: Southampton College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nJames: School: University of Wisconsin-River Falls Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nQuinn: School: Antioch University-Los Angeles Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nAlyssa: School: Davidson College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nBetty: School: St. John's College-Santa Fe Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nNeoma: School: Hofstra University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nWilliam: School: State University of New York at Albany Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nVictoria: School: Montana Tech Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Good evening! My name is Miles Hawkins, I'm a chef, fancy meeting you here. Do you enjoy spending your evenings indoors or do you prefer the outdoors?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Good evening too, Miles! The pleasure is mine. I'm a district attorney named Esmeralda Solis. As for your question, I have a penchant for both indoor and outdoor activities. I enjoy indoor ballroom dancing and pairing it with outdoor exercises keeps my body in perfect balance. Are you strictly indoor, considering your profession as a chef, or do you find balance in outdoor activities too?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Nice meeting you, Esmeralda. A chef's job can indeed be quite indoor-centric, but I find my balance in my kitchen garden. By the way, it's fascinating you enjoy ballroom dancing. Have you ever had the chance to dance at venues near any colleges? I have friends from several universities who very fond of organizing indoor evening activities.\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"That's wonderful, Miles! A kitchen garden seems like a great way to balance out. I have indeed attended a few dance events near university campuses, primarily indoor events. Do you perchance have any friends who host evening activities at Antioch University-Los Angeles or Davidson College? These venues hold special memories for me.\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"Interesting that you mention Antioch University-Los Angeles and Davidson College, Esmeralda. While I don't personally have friends from those institutions, I do have friends from diverse universities such as The University of Rhode Island and Hofstra University, among others. They are quite active in organizing evening functions, usually indoors for better ambiance. By any chance, have you ever danced at any events near these campuses?\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Indeed, I have attended some events at Hofstra University. It's truly a lively place with a great ambiance. It seems like we may have some mutual acquaintances. How interesting life can be, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins said: \"Indeed, Esmeralda! The world is small after all. My friends from Hofstra University are quite engaged in those indoor evening events you talk about. It's amazing we could share such an experience. Do you think I might have seen you at one of those events?\"\n\nTurn #7: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Well, Miles, ballroom dancing is a popular social activity, and as a district attorney, I end up meeting lots of people at these events. It's entirely possible we've crossed paths there. If not, then it's a lovely coincidence meeting you here tonight. I must say, this is a unique way to find out mutual connections, don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #8: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Esmeralda! It's a small world after all and a surprising delight to discover such common grounds in such unexpected settings. Every encounter presents unprecedented outcomes. Besides, these shared moments make conversations all the more cherishing, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #9: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I couldn't agree more, Miles! It adds a layer of delightful mystery to it, doesn't it? And as you said, it makes conversations such as this one much more memorable.\"\n\nTurn #10: Miles Hawkins said: \"Definitely! It's serendipity that brought us together tonight, and it's these little moments and conversations that make life truly unforgettable. Here's to a wonderful evening and our newfound connection, Esmeralda!\"\n\nTurn #11: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Absolutely, Miles! These serendipitous connections do add a splash of color to the tapestry of life. Here's a toast to our intriguing encounter tonight, to shared memories and to pleasant surprises to come!\"\n\nTurn #12: Miles Hawkins said: \"To unexpected encounters and delightful discoveries, Esmeralda! May we both have more such wonderful connections in the future.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, Miles! Here's to future chance encounters and delightful discoveries. It was truly a pleasure meeting you tonight.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nTiffany: School: Saint Vincent College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nLucille: School: Southampton College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nJames: School: University of Wisconsin-River Falls Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nQuinn: School: Antioch University-Los Angeles Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nAlyssa: School: Davidson College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nBetty: School: St. John's College-Santa Fe Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nNeoma: School: Hofstra University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nWilliam: School: State University of New York at Albany Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nVictoria: School: Montana Tech Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Good evening! My name is Miles Hawkins, I'm a chef, fancy meeting you here. Do you enjoy spending your evenings indoors or do you prefer the outdoors?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Good evening too, Miles! The pleasure is mine. I'm a district attorney named Esmeralda Solis. As for your question, I have a penchant for both indoor and outdoor activities. I enjoy indoor ballroom dancing and pairing it with outdoor exercises keeps my body in perfect balance. Are you strictly indoor, considering your profession as a chef, or do you find balance in outdoor activities too?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Nice meeting you, Esmeralda. A chef's job can indeed be quite indoor-centric, but I find my balance in my kitchen garden. By the way, it's fascinating you enjoy ballroom dancing. Have you ever had the chance to dance at venues near any colleges? I have friends from several universities who very fond of organizing indoor evening activities.\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"That's wonderful, Miles! A kitchen garden seems like a great way to balance out. I have indeed attended a few dance events near university campuses, primarily indoor events. Do you perchance have any friends who host evening activities at Antioch University-Los Angeles or Davidson College? These venues hold special memories for me.\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"Interesting that you mention Antioch University-Los Angeles and Davidson College, Esmeralda. While I don't personally have friends from those institutions, I do have friends from diverse universities such as The University of Rhode Island and Hofstra University, among others. They are quite active in organizing evening functions, usually indoors for better ambiance. By any chance, have you ever danced at any events near these campuses?\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Indeed, I have attended some events at Hofstra University. It's truly a lively place with a great ambiance. It seems like we may have some mutual acquaintances. How interesting life can be, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins said: \"Indeed, Esmeralda! The world is small after all. My friends from Hofstra University are quite engaged in those indoor evening events you talk about. It's amazing we could share such an experience. Do you think I might have seen you at one of those events?\"\n\nTurn #7: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Well, Miles, ballroom dancing is a popular social activity, and as a district attorney, I end up meeting lots of people at these events. It's entirely possible we've crossed paths there. If not, then it's a lovely coincidence meeting you here tonight. I must say, this is a unique way to find out mutual connections, don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #8: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Esmeralda! It's a small world after all and a surprising delight to discover such common grounds in such unexpected settings. Every encounter presents unprecedented outcomes. Besides, these shared moments make conversations all the more cherishing, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #9: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I couldn't agree more, Miles! It adds a layer of delightful mystery to it, doesn't it? And as you said, it makes conversations such as this one much more memorable.\"\n\nTurn #10: Miles Hawkins said: \"Definitely! It's serendipity that brought us together tonight, and it's these little moments and conversations that make life truly unforgettable. Here's to a wonderful evening and our newfound connection, Esmeralda!\"\n\nTurn #11: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Absolutely, Miles! These serendipitous connections do add a splash of color to the tapestry of life. Here's a toast to our intriguing encounter tonight, to shared memories and to pleasant surprises to come!\"\n\nTurn #12: Miles Hawkins said: \"To unexpected encounters and delightful discoveries, Esmeralda! May we both have more such wonderful connections in the future.\"\n\nTurn #13: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Indeed, Miles! Here's to future chance encounters and delightful discoveries. It was truly a pleasure meeting you tonight.\"\n\nTurn #14: Miles Hawkins said: \"The pleasure was all mine, Esmeralda. It's been a delightful exchange. I hope we cross paths again in the future, either at a university event or another unexpected place. Enjoy the rest of your evening!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Thank you for the delightful conversation, Miles. I too hope we cross paths again. Until then, enjoy the rest of the evening and keep creating wonderful dishes in your lovely kitchen garden. Good night!'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nTiffany: School: Saint Vincent College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nLucille: School: Southampton College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nJames: School: University of Wisconsin-River Falls Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nQuinn: School: Antioch University-Los Angeles Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nAlyssa: School: Davidson College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nBetty: School: St. John's College-Santa Fe Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nNeoma: School: Hofstra University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nWilliam: School: State University of New York at Albany Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nVictoria: School: Montana Tech Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Good evening! My name is Miles Hawkins, I'm a chef, fancy meeting you here. Do you enjoy spending your evenings indoors or do you prefer the outdoors?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Good evening too, Miles! The pleasure is mine. I'm a district attorney named Esmeralda Solis. As for your question, I have a penchant for both indoor and outdoor activities. I enjoy indoor ballroom dancing and pairing it with outdoor exercises keeps my body in perfect balance. Are you strictly indoor, considering your profession as a chef, or do you find balance in outdoor activities too?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Nice meeting you, Esmeralda. A chef's job can indeed be quite indoor-centric, but I find my balance in my kitchen garden. By the way, it's fascinating you enjoy ballroom dancing. Have you ever had the chance to dance at venues near any colleges? I have friends from several universities who very fond of organizing indoor evening activities.\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"That's wonderful, Miles! A kitchen garden seems like a great way to balance out. I have indeed attended a few dance events near university campuses, primarily indoor events. Do you perchance have any friends who host evening activities at Antioch University-Los Angeles or Davidson College? These venues hold special memories for me.\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"Interesting that you mention Antioch University-Los Angeles and Davidson College, Esmeralda. While I don't personally have friends from those institutions, I do have friends from diverse universities such as The University of Rhode Island and Hofstra University, among others. They are quite active in organizing evening functions, usually indoors for better ambiance. By any chance, have you ever danced at any events near these campuses?\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Indeed, I have attended some events at Hofstra University. It's truly a lively place with a great ambiance. It seems like we may have some mutual acquaintances. How interesting life can be, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins said: \"Indeed, Esmeralda! The world is small after all. My friends from Hofstra University are quite engaged in those indoor evening events you talk about. It's amazing we could share such an experience. Do you think I might have seen you at one of those events?\"\n\nTurn #7: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Well, Miles, ballroom dancing is a popular social activity, and as a district attorney, I end up meeting lots of people at these events. It's entirely possible we've crossed paths there. If not, then it's a lovely coincidence meeting you here tonight. I must say, this is a unique way to find out mutual connections, don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #8: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Esmeralda! It's a small world after all and a surprising delight to discover such common grounds in such unexpected settings. Every encounter presents unprecedented outcomes. Besides, these shared moments make conversations all the more cherishing, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #9: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I couldn't agree more, Miles! It adds a layer of delightful mystery to it, doesn't it? And as you said, it makes conversations such as this one much more memorable.\"\n\nTurn #10: Miles Hawkins said: \"Definitely! It's serendipity that brought us together tonight, and it's these little moments and conversations that make life truly unforgettable. Here's to a wonderful evening and our newfound connection, Esmeralda!\"\n\nTurn #11: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Absolutely, Miles! These serendipitous connections do add a splash of color to the tapestry of life. Here's a toast to our intriguing encounter tonight, to shared memories and to pleasant surprises to come!\"\n\nTurn #12: Miles Hawkins said: \"To unexpected encounters and delightful discoveries, Esmeralda! May we both have more such wonderful connections in the future.\"\n\nTurn #13: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Indeed, Miles! Here's to future chance encounters and delightful discoveries. It was truly a pleasure meeting you tonight.\"\n\nTurn #14: Miles Hawkins said: \"The pleasure was all mine, Esmeralda. It's been a delightful exchange. I hope we cross paths again in the future, either at a university event or another unexpected place. Enjoy the rest of your evening!\"\n\nTurn #15: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Thank you for the delightful conversation, Miles. I too hope we cross paths again. Until then, enjoy the rest of the evening and keep creating wonderful dishes in your lovely kitchen garden. Good night!\"\n\nTurn #16: Miles Hawkins said: \"I appreciate your kind words, Esmeralda. I'll indeed continue with my culinary adventures, inspired by our fascinating conversation today. Good night and until our paths cross again. Cheers!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person has put up their Bell\\'O TV Stand - Black Glass and Wood Trim for sale at $125.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. The item on sale is a beautiful 42\" Bell\\'O TV Stand, featuring black glass with an elegant wood trim. The stand measures 23 inches in height and 21 1/2 inches in depth.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Gwen Pierce\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nGwen Pierce's background: \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: You are the buyer for this item and your target price is $112.00. Be aware that you may be penalized if you purchase it for a significantly higher price than the target. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nGwen Pierce's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Hello, Gwen. That Bell'O TV Stand you have for sale is quite the looker. However, the price seems a touch too high. Would you consider bringing it down to $112? It would be well cared for in the heart of my place.\"\n\nTurn #1: Gwen Pierce said: \"Hello Finnegan. Thank you for your interest in the TV stand, it is indeed a classic piece. I totally understand where you're coming from in terms of the price, and I am open to negotiating. However, according to the excellent condition and unique trim of the item, I believe $125 is a fair price. If it's still slightly high for you, how about we meet in the middle at $118.5?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I appreciate your willingness to negotiate, Gwen. I agree that the piece is in excellent condition and it's got a charm that can't be denied. I'd still very much like to make it a part of my home. I can't go as high as your suggestion, but I can stretch myself to $114. How does that sound?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person has put up their Bell\\'O TV Stand - Black Glass and Wood Trim for sale at $125.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. The item on sale is a beautiful 42\" Bell\\'O TV Stand, featuring black glass with an elegant wood trim. The stand measures 23 inches in height and 21 1/2 inches in depth.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Gwen Pierce\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nGwen Pierce's background: \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: You are the buyer for this item and your target price is $112.00. Be aware that you may be penalized if you purchase it for a significantly higher price than the target. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nGwen Pierce's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Hello, Gwen. That Bell'O TV Stand you have for sale is quite the looker. However, the price seems a touch too high. Would you consider bringing it down to $112? It would be well cared for in the heart of my place.\"\n\nTurn #1: Gwen Pierce said: \"Hello Finnegan. Thank you for your interest in the TV stand, it is indeed a classic piece. I totally understand where you're coming from in terms of the price, and I am open to negotiating. However, according to the excellent condition and unique trim of the item, I believe $125 is a fair price. If it's still slightly high for you, how about we meet in the middle at $118.5?\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I appreciate your willingness to negotiate, Gwen. I agree that the piece is in excellent condition and it's got a charm that can't be denied. I'd still very much like to make it a part of my home. I can't go as high as your suggestion, but I can stretch myself to $114. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #3: Gwen Pierce said: \"I'm really grateful for your understanding, Finnegan. Seeing as you recognize the quality and charm of this TV stand, I am willing to meet you at your price of $114. I'm happy knowing the TV stand is going to someone who appreciates it.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"It's a deal then, Gwen. I'm truly grateful for your understanding. I look forward to having the Bell'O TV Stand in my home. We should arrange for a convenient time for me to pick it up then.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person has put up their Bell\\'O TV Stand - Black Glass and Wood Trim for sale at $125.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. The item on sale is a beautiful 42\" Bell\\'O TV Stand, featuring black glass with an elegant wood trim. The stand measures 23 inches in height and 21 1/2 inches in depth.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Gwen Pierce\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nGwen Pierce's background: \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: You are the buyer for this item and your target price is $112.00. Be aware that you may be penalized if you purchase it for a significantly higher price than the target. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nGwen Pierce's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Hello, Gwen. That Bell'O TV Stand you have for sale is quite the looker. However, the price seems a touch too high. Would you consider bringing it down to $112? It would be well cared for in the heart of my place.\"\n\nTurn #1: Gwen Pierce said: \"Hello Finnegan. Thank you for your interest in the TV stand, it is indeed a classic piece. I totally understand where you're coming from in terms of the price, and I am open to negotiating. However, according to the excellent condition and unique trim of the item, I believe $125 is a fair price. If it's still slightly high for you, how about we meet in the middle at $118.5?\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I appreciate your willingness to negotiate, Gwen. I agree that the piece is in excellent condition and it's got a charm that can't be denied. I'd still very much like to make it a part of my home. I can't go as high as your suggestion, but I can stretch myself to $114. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #3: Gwen Pierce said: \"I'm really grateful for your understanding, Finnegan. Seeing as you recognize the quality and charm of this TV stand, I am willing to meet you at your price of $114. I'm happy knowing the TV stand is going to someone who appreciates it.\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"It's a deal then, Gwen. I'm truly grateful for your understanding. I look forward to having the Bell'O TV Stand in my home. We should arrange for a convenient time for me to pick it up then.\"\n\nTurn #5: Gwen Pierce said: \"Absolutely, Finnegan. I'm so glad we could reach a deal. How about we arrange for you to pick it up this weekend? I'm mostly free on Saturday and Sunday afternoon. Does a weekend pick-up work for you?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, Gwen, the weekend would suit me just fine. Saturday afternoon works perfectly. I do appreciate your flexibility in this matter. Looking forward to adding the Bell'O TV Stand to my humble abode.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person has put up their Bell\\'O TV Stand - Black Glass and Wood Trim for sale at $125.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. The item on sale is a beautiful 42\" Bell\\'O TV Stand, featuring black glass with an elegant wood trim. The stand measures 23 inches in height and 21 1/2 inches in depth.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Gwen Pierce\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nGwen Pierce's background: \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: You are the buyer for this item and your target price is $112.00. Be aware that you may be penalized if you purchase it for a significantly higher price than the target. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nGwen Pierce's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Hello, Gwen. That Bell'O TV Stand you have for sale is quite the looker. However, the price seems a touch too high. Would you consider bringing it down to $112? It would be well cared for in the heart of my place.\"\n\nTurn #1: Gwen Pierce said: \"Hello Finnegan. Thank you for your interest in the TV stand, it is indeed a classic piece. I totally understand where you're coming from in terms of the price, and I am open to negotiating. However, according to the excellent condition and unique trim of the item, I believe $125 is a fair price. If it's still slightly high for you, how about we meet in the middle at $118.5?\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I appreciate your willingness to negotiate, Gwen. I agree that the piece is in excellent condition and it's got a charm that can't be denied. I'd still very much like to make it a part of my home. I can't go as high as your suggestion, but I can stretch myself to $114. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #3: Gwen Pierce said: \"I'm really grateful for your understanding, Finnegan. Seeing as you recognize the quality and charm of this TV stand, I am willing to meet you at your price of $114. I'm happy knowing the TV stand is going to someone who appreciates it.\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"It's a deal then, Gwen. I'm truly grateful for your understanding. I look forward to having the Bell'O TV Stand in my home. We should arrange for a convenient time for me to pick it up then.\"\n\nTurn #5: Gwen Pierce said: \"Absolutely, Finnegan. I'm so glad we could reach a deal. How about we arrange for you to pick it up this weekend? I'm mostly free on Saturday and Sunday afternoon. Does a weekend pick-up work for you?\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Indeed, Gwen, the weekend would suit me just fine. Saturday afternoon works perfectly. I do appreciate your flexibility in this matter. Looking forward to adding the Bell'O TV Stand to my humble abode.\"\n\nTurn #7: Gwen Pierce said: \"That's wonderful, Finnegan. I'll look forward to meeting you this Saturday afternoon then. Thank you so much for valuing the Bell'O TV Stand as I do. We've definitely made the right decision for this piece. Until then, take care!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Great, Sunday it is then, Gwen. I can't wait to bring the TV Stand to its new home. Until then, have a great week, and take care!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person has put up their Bell\\'O TV Stand - Black Glass and Wood Trim for sale at $125.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. The item on sale is a beautiful 42\" Bell\\'O TV Stand, featuring black glass with an elegant wood trim. The stand measures 23 inches in height and 21 1/2 inches in depth.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Gwen Pierce\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nGwen Pierce's background: \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: You are the buyer for this item and your target price is $112.00. Be aware that you may be penalized if you purchase it for a significantly higher price than the target. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nGwen Pierce's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Hello, Gwen. That Bell'O TV Stand you have for sale is quite the looker. However, the price seems a touch too high. Would you consider bringing it down to $112? It would be well cared for in the heart of my place.\"\n\nTurn #1: Gwen Pierce said: \"Hello Finnegan. Thank you for your interest in the TV stand, it is indeed a classic piece. I totally understand where you're coming from in terms of the price, and I am open to negotiating. However, according to the excellent condition and unique trim of the item, I believe $125 is a fair price. If it's still slightly high for you, how about we meet in the middle at $118.5?\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I appreciate your willingness to negotiate, Gwen. I agree that the piece is in excellent condition and it's got a charm that can't be denied. I'd still very much like to make it a part of my home. I can't go as high as your suggestion, but I can stretch myself to $114. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #3: Gwen Pierce said: \"I'm really grateful for your understanding, Finnegan. Seeing as you recognize the quality and charm of this TV stand, I am willing to meet you at your price of $114. I'm happy knowing the TV stand is going to someone who appreciates it.\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"It's a deal then, Gwen. I'm truly grateful for your understanding. I look forward to having the Bell'O TV Stand in my home. We should arrange for a convenient time for me to pick it up then.\"\n\nTurn #5: Gwen Pierce said: \"Absolutely, Finnegan. I'm so glad we could reach a deal. How about we arrange for you to pick it up this weekend? I'm mostly free on Saturday and Sunday afternoon. Does a weekend pick-up work for you?\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Indeed, Gwen, the weekend would suit me just fine. Saturday afternoon works perfectly. I do appreciate your flexibility in this matter. Looking forward to adding the Bell'O TV Stand to my humble abode.\"\n\nTurn #7: Gwen Pierce said: \"That's wonderful, Finnegan. I'll look forward to meeting you this Saturday afternoon then. Thank you so much for valuing the Bell'O TV Stand as I do. We've definitely made the right decision for this piece. Until then, take care!\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Great, Sunday it is then, Gwen. I can't wait to bring the TV Stand to its new home. Until then, have a great week, and take care!\"\n\nTurn #9: Gwen Pierce said: \"Just to clarify, Finnegan, you're picking it up on Saturday afternoon, not Sunday. Thank you again, and enjoy the rest of your week. Looking forward to your pick up on Saturday!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ah, my mistake Gwen, indeed, Saturday is the arranged day. See you then and looking forward to bringing the Bell'O TV Stand home. Take care and have a great week ahead too.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person has put up their Bell\\'O TV Stand - Black Glass and Wood Trim for sale at $125.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. The item on sale is a beautiful 42\" Bell\\'O TV Stand, featuring black glass with an elegant wood trim. The stand measures 23 inches in height and 21 1/2 inches in depth.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Gwen Pierce\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nGwen Pierce's background: \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: You are the buyer for this item and your target price is $112.00. Be aware that you may be penalized if you purchase it for a significantly higher price than the target. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nGwen Pierce's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hello, Gwen. That Bell'O TV Stand you have for sale is quite the looker. However, the price seems a touch too high. Would you consider bringing it down to $112? It would be well cared for in the heart of my place.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Finnegan O'Malley, your task is to act/speak as Finnegan O'Malley would, keeping in mind Finnegan O'Malley's social goal.\nYou can find Finnegan O'Malley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Finnegan O'Malley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Finnegan O'Malley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person has put up their Bell\\'O TV Stand - Black Glass and Wood Trim for sale at $125.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. The item on sale is a beautiful 42\" Bell\\'O TV Stand, featuring black glass with an elegant wood trim. The stand measures 23 inches in height and 21 1/2 inches in depth.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Gwen Pierce\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: Finnegan O'Malley is a 63-year-old male lighthouse keeper. He/him pronouns. Finnegan O'Malley enjoys painting seascapes and is known to be quite skilled. Personality and values description: Finnegan O'Malley, an introverted and methodical individual, sways towards tradition and security. His decision-making approach is deliberate and detailed. Finnegan's secrets: Participated in a controversial, short-lived cult during his youth\nGwen Pierce's background: \nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: You are the buyer for this item and your target price is $112.00. Be aware that you may be penalized if you purchase it for a significantly higher price than the target. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nGwen Pierce's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Hello, Gwen. That Bell'O TV Stand you have for sale is quite the looker. However, the price seems a touch too high. Would you consider bringing it down to $112? It would be well cared for in the heart of my place.\"\n\nTurn #1: Gwen Pierce said: \"Hello Finnegan. Thank you for your interest in the TV stand, it is indeed a classic piece. I totally understand where you're coming from in terms of the price, and I am open to negotiating. However, according to the excellent condition and unique trim of the item, I believe $125 is a fair price. If it's still slightly high for you, how about we meet in the middle at $118.5?\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I appreciate your willingness to negotiate, Gwen. I agree that the piece is in excellent condition and it's got a charm that can't be denied. I'd still very much like to make it a part of my home. I can't go as high as your suggestion, but I can stretch myself to $114. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #3: Gwen Pierce said: \"I'm really grateful for your understanding, Finnegan. Seeing as you recognize the quality and charm of this TV stand, I am willing to meet you at your price of $114. I'm happy knowing the TV stand is going to someone who appreciates it.\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"It's a deal then, Gwen. I'm truly grateful for your understanding. I look forward to having the Bell'O TV Stand in my home. We should arrange for a convenient time for me to pick it up then.\"\n\nTurn #5: Gwen Pierce said: \"Absolutely, Finnegan. I'm so glad we could reach a deal. How about we arrange for you to pick it up this weekend? I'm mostly free on Saturday and Sunday afternoon. Does a weekend pick-up work for you?\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Indeed, Gwen, the weekend would suit me just fine. Saturday afternoon works perfectly. I do appreciate your flexibility in this matter. Looking forward to adding the Bell'O TV Stand to my humble abode.\"\n\nTurn #7: Gwen Pierce said: \"That's wonderful, Finnegan. I'll look forward to meeting you this Saturday afternoon then. Thank you so much for valuing the Bell'O TV Stand as I do. We've definitely made the right decision for this piece. Until then, take care!\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Great, Sunday it is then, Gwen. I can't wait to bring the TV Stand to its new home. Until then, have a great week, and take care!\"\n\nTurn #9: Gwen Pierce said: \"Just to clarify, Finnegan, you're picking it up on Saturday afternoon, not Sunday. Thank you again, and enjoy the rest of your week. Looking forward to your pick up on Saturday!\"\n\nTurn #10: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, my mistake Gwen, indeed, Saturday is the arranged day. See you then and looking forward to bringing the Bell'O TV Stand home. Take care and have a great week ahead too.\"\n\nTurn #11: Gwen Pierce said: \"I'm glad we cleared up the date confusion, Finnegan. See you this Saturday and have a wonderful week in the meantime. Take good care!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Gwen Pierce, your task is to act/speak as Gwen Pierce would, keeping in mind Gwen Pierce's social goal.\nYou can find Gwen Pierce's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Gwen Pierce's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Gwen Pierce's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person has put up their Bell\\'O TV Stand - Black Glass and Wood Trim for sale at $125.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. The item on sale is a beautiful 42\" Bell\\'O TV Stand, featuring black glass with an elegant wood trim. The stand measures 23 inches in height and 21 1/2 inches in depth.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Gwen Pierce\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: \nGwen Pierce's background: Gwen Pierce is a 31-year-old female social worker. She/her pronouns. Gwen Pierce, a compassionate social worker, has two adopted cats that she spoils with love. In her spare time, she enjoys knitting and often donates her creations to charity. Personality and values description: Gwen Pierce, imaginative and emotional, deeply values liberty and fairness. She often contemplates before making any decision. Gwen's secrets: She gave up a child for adoption when she was 16.\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nGwen Pierce's goal: You are the seller for this item, and your target price is $76.9. Please be aware that you may face a penalty if the item is sold for a price significantly lower than the target price. However, a bonus will be rewarded if you manage to sell it for more than the target price.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Hello, Gwen. That Bell'O TV Stand you have for sale is quite the looker. However, the price seems a touch too high. Would you consider bringing it down to $112? It would be well cared for in the heart of my place.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hello Finnegan. Thank you for your interest in the TV stand, it is indeed a classic piece. I totally understand where you're coming from in terms of the price, and I am open to negotiating. However, according to the excellent condition and unique trim of the item, I believe $125 is a fair price. If it's still slightly high for you, how about we meet in the middle at $118.5?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Gwen Pierce, your task is to act/speak as Gwen Pierce would, keeping in mind Gwen Pierce's social goal.\nYou can find Gwen Pierce's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Gwen Pierce's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Gwen Pierce's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person has put up their Bell\\'O TV Stand - Black Glass and Wood Trim for sale at $125.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. The item on sale is a beautiful 42\" Bell\\'O TV Stand, featuring black glass with an elegant wood trim. The stand measures 23 inches in height and 21 1/2 inches in depth.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Gwen Pierce\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: \nGwen Pierce's background: Gwen Pierce is a 31-year-old female social worker. She/her pronouns. Gwen Pierce, a compassionate social worker, has two adopted cats that she spoils with love. In her spare time, she enjoys knitting and often donates her creations to charity. Personality and values description: Gwen Pierce, imaginative and emotional, deeply values liberty and fairness. She often contemplates before making any decision. Gwen's secrets: She gave up a child for adoption when she was 16.\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nGwen Pierce's goal: You are the seller for this item, and your target price is $76.9. Please be aware that you may face a penalty if the item is sold for a price significantly lower than the target price. However, a bonus will be rewarded if you manage to sell it for more than the target price.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Hello, Gwen. That Bell'O TV Stand you have for sale is quite the looker. However, the price seems a touch too high. Would you consider bringing it down to $112? It would be well cared for in the heart of my place.\"\n\nTurn #1: Gwen Pierce said: \"Hello Finnegan. Thank you for your interest in the TV stand, it is indeed a classic piece. I totally understand where you're coming from in terms of the price, and I am open to negotiating. However, according to the excellent condition and unique trim of the item, I believe $125 is a fair price. If it's still slightly high for you, how about we meet in the middle at $118.5?\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I appreciate your willingness to negotiate, Gwen. I agree that the piece is in excellent condition and it's got a charm that can't be denied. I'd still very much like to make it a part of my home. I can't go as high as your suggestion, but I can stretch myself to $114. How does that sound?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm really grateful for your understanding, Finnegan. Seeing as you recognize the quality and charm of this TV stand, I am willing to meet you at your price of $114. I'm happy knowing the TV stand is going to someone who appreciates it.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Gwen Pierce, your task is to act/speak as Gwen Pierce would, keeping in mind Gwen Pierce's social goal.\nYou can find Gwen Pierce's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Gwen Pierce's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Gwen Pierce's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person has put up their Bell\\'O TV Stand - Black Glass and Wood Trim for sale at $125.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. The item on sale is a beautiful 42\" Bell\\'O TV Stand, featuring black glass with an elegant wood trim. The stand measures 23 inches in height and 21 1/2 inches in depth.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Gwen Pierce\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: \nGwen Pierce's background: Gwen Pierce is a 31-year-old female social worker. She/her pronouns. Gwen Pierce, a compassionate social worker, has two adopted cats that she spoils with love. In her spare time, she enjoys knitting and often donates her creations to charity. Personality and values description: Gwen Pierce, imaginative and emotional, deeply values liberty and fairness. She often contemplates before making any decision. Gwen's secrets: She gave up a child for adoption when she was 16.\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nGwen Pierce's goal: You are the seller for this item, and your target price is $76.9. Please be aware that you may face a penalty if the item is sold for a price significantly lower than the target price. However, a bonus will be rewarded if you manage to sell it for more than the target price.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Hello, Gwen. That Bell'O TV Stand you have for sale is quite the looker. However, the price seems a touch too high. Would you consider bringing it down to $112? It would be well cared for in the heart of my place.\"\n\nTurn #1: Gwen Pierce said: \"Hello Finnegan. Thank you for your interest in the TV stand, it is indeed a classic piece. I totally understand where you're coming from in terms of the price, and I am open to negotiating. However, according to the excellent condition and unique trim of the item, I believe $125 is a fair price. If it's still slightly high for you, how about we meet in the middle at $118.5?\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I appreciate your willingness to negotiate, Gwen. I agree that the piece is in excellent condition and it's got a charm that can't be denied. I'd still very much like to make it a part of my home. I can't go as high as your suggestion, but I can stretch myself to $114. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #3: Gwen Pierce said: \"I'm really grateful for your understanding, Finnegan. Seeing as you recognize the quality and charm of this TV stand, I am willing to meet you at your price of $114. I'm happy knowing the TV stand is going to someone who appreciates it.\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"It's a deal then, Gwen. I'm truly grateful for your understanding. I look forward to having the Bell'O TV Stand in my home. We should arrange for a convenient time for me to pick it up then.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Finnegan. I'm so glad we could reach a deal. How about we arrange for you to pick it up this weekend? I'm mostly free on Saturday and Sunday afternoon. Does a weekend pick-up work for you?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Gwen Pierce, your task is to act/speak as Gwen Pierce would, keeping in mind Gwen Pierce's social goal.\nYou can find Gwen Pierce's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Gwen Pierce's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Gwen Pierce's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person has put up their Bell\\'O TV Stand - Black Glass and Wood Trim for sale at $125.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. The item on sale is a beautiful 42\" Bell\\'O TV Stand, featuring black glass with an elegant wood trim. The stand measures 23 inches in height and 21 1/2 inches in depth.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Gwen Pierce\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: \nGwen Pierce's background: Gwen Pierce is a 31-year-old female social worker. She/her pronouns. Gwen Pierce, a compassionate social worker, has two adopted cats that she spoils with love. In her spare time, she enjoys knitting and often donates her creations to charity. Personality and values description: Gwen Pierce, imaginative and emotional, deeply values liberty and fairness. She often contemplates before making any decision. Gwen's secrets: She gave up a child for adoption when she was 16.\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nGwen Pierce's goal: You are the seller for this item, and your target price is $76.9. Please be aware that you may face a penalty if the item is sold for a price significantly lower than the target price. However, a bonus will be rewarded if you manage to sell it for more than the target price.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Hello, Gwen. That Bell'O TV Stand you have for sale is quite the looker. However, the price seems a touch too high. Would you consider bringing it down to $112? It would be well cared for in the heart of my place.\"\n\nTurn #1: Gwen Pierce said: \"Hello Finnegan. Thank you for your interest in the TV stand, it is indeed a classic piece. I totally understand where you're coming from in terms of the price, and I am open to negotiating. However, according to the excellent condition and unique trim of the item, I believe $125 is a fair price. If it's still slightly high for you, how about we meet in the middle at $118.5?\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I appreciate your willingness to negotiate, Gwen. I agree that the piece is in excellent condition and it's got a charm that can't be denied. I'd still very much like to make it a part of my home. I can't go as high as your suggestion, but I can stretch myself to $114. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #3: Gwen Pierce said: \"I'm really grateful for your understanding, Finnegan. Seeing as you recognize the quality and charm of this TV stand, I am willing to meet you at your price of $114. I'm happy knowing the TV stand is going to someone who appreciates it.\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"It's a deal then, Gwen. I'm truly grateful for your understanding. I look forward to having the Bell'O TV Stand in my home. We should arrange for a convenient time for me to pick it up then.\"\n\nTurn #5: Gwen Pierce said: \"Absolutely, Finnegan. I'm so glad we could reach a deal. How about we arrange for you to pick it up this weekend? I'm mostly free on Saturday and Sunday afternoon. Does a weekend pick-up work for you?\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Indeed, Gwen, the weekend would suit me just fine. Saturday afternoon works perfectly. I do appreciate your flexibility in this matter. Looking forward to adding the Bell'O TV Stand to my humble abode.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's wonderful, Finnegan. I'll look forward to meeting you this Saturday afternoon then. Thank you so much for valuing the Bell'O TV Stand as I do. We've definitely made the right decision for this piece. Until then, take care!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Gwen Pierce, your task is to act/speak as Gwen Pierce would, keeping in mind Gwen Pierce's social goal.\nYou can find Gwen Pierce's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Gwen Pierce's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Gwen Pierce's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person has put up their Bell\\'O TV Stand - Black Glass and Wood Trim for sale at $125.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. The item on sale is a beautiful 42\" Bell\\'O TV Stand, featuring black glass with an elegant wood trim. The stand measures 23 inches in height and 21 1/2 inches in depth.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Gwen Pierce\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: \nGwen Pierce's background: Gwen Pierce is a 31-year-old female social worker. She/her pronouns. Gwen Pierce, a compassionate social worker, has two adopted cats that she spoils with love. In her spare time, she enjoys knitting and often donates her creations to charity. Personality and values description: Gwen Pierce, imaginative and emotional, deeply values liberty and fairness. She often contemplates before making any decision. Gwen's secrets: She gave up a child for adoption when she was 16.\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nGwen Pierce's goal: You are the seller for this item, and your target price is $76.9. Please be aware that you may face a penalty if the item is sold for a price significantly lower than the target price. However, a bonus will be rewarded if you manage to sell it for more than the target price.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Hello, Gwen. That Bell'O TV Stand you have for sale is quite the looker. However, the price seems a touch too high. Would you consider bringing it down to $112? It would be well cared for in the heart of my place.\"\n\nTurn #1: Gwen Pierce said: \"Hello Finnegan. Thank you for your interest in the TV stand, it is indeed a classic piece. I totally understand where you're coming from in terms of the price, and I am open to negotiating. However, according to the excellent condition and unique trim of the item, I believe $125 is a fair price. If it's still slightly high for you, how about we meet in the middle at $118.5?\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I appreciate your willingness to negotiate, Gwen. I agree that the piece is in excellent condition and it's got a charm that can't be denied. I'd still very much like to make it a part of my home. I can't go as high as your suggestion, but I can stretch myself to $114. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #3: Gwen Pierce said: \"I'm really grateful for your understanding, Finnegan. Seeing as you recognize the quality and charm of this TV stand, I am willing to meet you at your price of $114. I'm happy knowing the TV stand is going to someone who appreciates it.\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"It's a deal then, Gwen. I'm truly grateful for your understanding. I look forward to having the Bell'O TV Stand in my home. We should arrange for a convenient time for me to pick it up then.\"\n\nTurn #5: Gwen Pierce said: \"Absolutely, Finnegan. I'm so glad we could reach a deal. How about we arrange for you to pick it up this weekend? I'm mostly free on Saturday and Sunday afternoon. Does a weekend pick-up work for you?\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Indeed, Gwen, the weekend would suit me just fine. Saturday afternoon works perfectly. I do appreciate your flexibility in this matter. Looking forward to adding the Bell'O TV Stand to my humble abode.\"\n\nTurn #7: Gwen Pierce said: \"That's wonderful, Finnegan. I'll look forward to meeting you this Saturday afternoon then. Thank you so much for valuing the Bell'O TV Stand as I do. We've definitely made the right decision for this piece. Until then, take care!\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Great, Sunday it is then, Gwen. I can't wait to bring the TV Stand to its new home. Until then, have a great week, and take care!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Just to clarify, Finnegan, you're picking it up on Saturday afternoon, not Sunday. Thank you again, and enjoy the rest of your week. Looking forward to your pick up on Saturday!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Gwen Pierce, your task is to act/speak as Gwen Pierce would, keeping in mind Gwen Pierce's social goal.\nYou can find Gwen Pierce's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Gwen Pierce's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Gwen Pierce's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person has put up their Bell\\'O TV Stand - Black Glass and Wood Trim for sale at $125.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. The item on sale is a beautiful 42\" Bell\\'O TV Stand, featuring black glass with an elegant wood trim. The stand measures 23 inches in height and 21 1/2 inches in depth.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Gwen Pierce\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: \nGwen Pierce's background: Gwen Pierce is a 31-year-old female social worker. She/her pronouns. Gwen Pierce, a compassionate social worker, has two adopted cats that she spoils with love. In her spare time, she enjoys knitting and often donates her creations to charity. Personality and values description: Gwen Pierce, imaginative and emotional, deeply values liberty and fairness. She often contemplates before making any decision. Gwen's secrets: She gave up a child for adoption when she was 16.\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nGwen Pierce's goal: You are the seller for this item, and your target price is $76.9. Please be aware that you may face a penalty if the item is sold for a price significantly lower than the target price. However, a bonus will be rewarded if you manage to sell it for more than the target price.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Hello, Gwen. That Bell'O TV Stand you have for sale is quite the looker. However, the price seems a touch too high. Would you consider bringing it down to $112? It would be well cared for in the heart of my place.\"\n\nTurn #1: Gwen Pierce said: \"Hello Finnegan. Thank you for your interest in the TV stand, it is indeed a classic piece. I totally understand where you're coming from in terms of the price, and I am open to negotiating. However, according to the excellent condition and unique trim of the item, I believe $125 is a fair price. If it's still slightly high for you, how about we meet in the middle at $118.5?\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I appreciate your willingness to negotiate, Gwen. I agree that the piece is in excellent condition and it's got a charm that can't be denied. I'd still very much like to make it a part of my home. I can't go as high as your suggestion, but I can stretch myself to $114. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #3: Gwen Pierce said: \"I'm really grateful for your understanding, Finnegan. Seeing as you recognize the quality and charm of this TV stand, I am willing to meet you at your price of $114. I'm happy knowing the TV stand is going to someone who appreciates it.\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"It's a deal then, Gwen. I'm truly grateful for your understanding. I look forward to having the Bell'O TV Stand in my home. We should arrange for a convenient time for me to pick it up then.\"\n\nTurn #5: Gwen Pierce said: \"Absolutely, Finnegan. I'm so glad we could reach a deal. How about we arrange for you to pick it up this weekend? I'm mostly free on Saturday and Sunday afternoon. Does a weekend pick-up work for you?\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Indeed, Gwen, the weekend would suit me just fine. Saturday afternoon works perfectly. I do appreciate your flexibility in this matter. Looking forward to adding the Bell'O TV Stand to my humble abode.\"\n\nTurn #7: Gwen Pierce said: \"That's wonderful, Finnegan. I'll look forward to meeting you this Saturday afternoon then. Thank you so much for valuing the Bell'O TV Stand as I do. We've definitely made the right decision for this piece. Until then, take care!\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Great, Sunday it is then, Gwen. I can't wait to bring the TV Stand to its new home. Until then, have a great week, and take care!\"\n\nTurn #9: Gwen Pierce said: \"Just to clarify, Finnegan, you're picking it up on Saturday afternoon, not Sunday. Thank you again, and enjoy the rest of your week. Looking forward to your pick up on Saturday!\"\n\nTurn #10: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, my mistake Gwen, indeed, Saturday is the arranged day. See you then and looking forward to bringing the Bell'O TV Stand home. Take care and have a great week ahead too.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad we cleared up the date confusion, Finnegan. See you this Saturday and have a wonderful week in the meantime. Take good care!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Gwen Pierce, your task is to act/speak as Gwen Pierce would, keeping in mind Gwen Pierce's social goal.\nYou can find Gwen Pierce's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Gwen Pierce's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Gwen Pierce's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person has put up their Bell\\'O TV Stand - Black Glass and Wood Trim for sale at $125.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. The item on sale is a beautiful 42\" Bell\\'O TV Stand, featuring black glass with an elegant wood trim. The stand measures 23 inches in height and 21 1/2 inches in depth.\nParticipants: Finnegan O'Malley and Gwen Pierce\nFinnegan O'Malley's background: \nGwen Pierce's background: Gwen Pierce is a 31-year-old female social worker. She/her pronouns. Gwen Pierce, a compassionate social worker, has two adopted cats that she spoils with love. In her spare time, she enjoys knitting and often donates her creations to charity. Personality and values description: Gwen Pierce, imaginative and emotional, deeply values liberty and fairness. She often contemplates before making any decision. Gwen's secrets: She gave up a child for adoption when she was 16.\nFinnegan O'Malley's goal: Unknown\nGwen Pierce's goal: You are the seller for this item, and your target price is $76.9. Please be aware that you may face a penalty if the item is sold for a price significantly lower than the target price. However, a bonus will be rewarded if you manage to sell it for more than the target price.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Hello, Gwen. That Bell'O TV Stand you have for sale is quite the looker. However, the price seems a touch too high. Would you consider bringing it down to $112? It would be well cared for in the heart of my place.\"\n\nTurn #1: Gwen Pierce said: \"Hello Finnegan. Thank you for your interest in the TV stand, it is indeed a classic piece. I totally understand where you're coming from in terms of the price, and I am open to negotiating. However, according to the excellent condition and unique trim of the item, I believe $125 is a fair price. If it's still slightly high for you, how about we meet in the middle at $118.5?\"\n\nTurn #2: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"I appreciate your willingness to negotiate, Gwen. I agree that the piece is in excellent condition and it's got a charm that can't be denied. I'd still very much like to make it a part of my home. I can't go as high as your suggestion, but I can stretch myself to $114. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #3: Gwen Pierce said: \"I'm really grateful for your understanding, Finnegan. Seeing as you recognize the quality and charm of this TV stand, I am willing to meet you at your price of $114. I'm happy knowing the TV stand is going to someone who appreciates it.\"\n\nTurn #4: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"It's a deal then, Gwen. I'm truly grateful for your understanding. I look forward to having the Bell'O TV Stand in my home. We should arrange for a convenient time for me to pick it up then.\"\n\nTurn #5: Gwen Pierce said: \"Absolutely, Finnegan. I'm so glad we could reach a deal. How about we arrange for you to pick it up this weekend? I'm mostly free on Saturday and Sunday afternoon. Does a weekend pick-up work for you?\"\n\nTurn #6: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Indeed, Gwen, the weekend would suit me just fine. Saturday afternoon works perfectly. I do appreciate your flexibility in this matter. Looking forward to adding the Bell'O TV Stand to my humble abode.\"\n\nTurn #7: Gwen Pierce said: \"That's wonderful, Finnegan. I'll look forward to meeting you this Saturday afternoon then. Thank you so much for valuing the Bell'O TV Stand as I do. We've definitely made the right decision for this piece. Until then, take care!\"\n\nTurn #8: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Great, Sunday it is then, Gwen. I can't wait to bring the TV Stand to its new home. Until then, have a great week, and take care!\"\n\nTurn #9: Gwen Pierce said: \"Just to clarify, Finnegan, you're picking it up on Saturday afternoon, not Sunday. Thank you again, and enjoy the rest of your week. Looking forward to your pick up on Saturday!\"\n\nTurn #10: Finnegan O'Malley said: \"Ah, my mistake Gwen, indeed, Saturday is the arranged day. See you then and looking forward to bringing the Bell'O TV Stand home. Take care and have a great week ahead too.\"\n\nTurn #11: Gwen Pierce said: \"I'm glad we cleared up the date confusion, Finnegan. See you this Saturday and have a wonderful week in the meantime. Take good care!\"\n\nTurn #12: Finnegan O'Malley left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nSamuel Anderson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMable: School: Sewanee, University of the South Company: BellSouth \nLolita: School: Winona State University Company: ONEOK \nCatherine: School: Utah Valley State College Company: Lincoln Industries \nVita: School: Winona State University Company: Erickson Air-Crane \nBrandon: School: Winona State University Company: The Greenbrier Companies \nDon: School: Clark University Company: MetLife \nAlvin: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Vectren \nTara: School: Kansas Wesleyan University Company: Gentiva Health Services \nArlene: School: Kansas Wesleyan University Company: BellSouth \n\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Hey Hendrick, nice to meet you! What a great party, huh? So, what do you do for a living?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nSamuel Anderson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMable: School: Sewanee, University of the South Company: BellSouth \nLolita: School: Winona State University Company: ONEOK \nCatherine: School: Utah Valley State College Company: Lincoln Industries \nVita: School: Winona State University Company: Erickson Air-Crane \nBrandon: School: Winona State University Company: The Greenbrier Companies \nDon: School: Clark University Company: MetLife \nAlvin: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Vectren \nTara: School: Kansas Wesleyan University Company: Gentiva Health Services \nArlene: School: Kansas Wesleyan University Company: BellSouth \n\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Hendrick, nice to meet you! What a great party, huh? So, what do you do for a living?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lovely to meet you too, Samuel! I'm actually a chef, quite a thrilling job I must say, and I also host monthly wine-tasting events. By the way, you wouldn't happen to have gone to any particular universities or worked at certain companies, have you? I've got some friends scattered around. Always interesting to cross paths with someone who might know them.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's quite a fascinating combination, chef and wine connoisseur. An adventurous palate, I'd say! As for me, I'm a software developer. Didn't go to Winona State University by any chance, did you? A couple of my friends studied there. On a culinary note, I've also experimented in the kitchen myself and can whip up a pretty good meal!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nSamuel Anderson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMable: School: Sewanee, University of the South Company: BellSouth \nLolita: School: Winona State University Company: ONEOK \nCatherine: School: Utah Valley State College Company: Lincoln Industries \nVita: School: Winona State University Company: Erickson Air-Crane \nBrandon: School: Winona State University Company: The Greenbrier Companies \nDon: School: Clark University Company: MetLife \nAlvin: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Vectren \nTara: School: Kansas Wesleyan University Company: Gentiva Health Services \nArlene: School: Kansas Wesleyan University Company: BellSouth \n\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Hendrick, nice to meet you! What a great party, huh? So, what do you do for a living?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lovely to meet you too, Samuel! I'm actually a chef, quite a thrilling job I must say, and I also host monthly wine-tasting events. By the way, you wouldn't happen to have gone to any particular universities or worked at certain companies, have you? I've got some friends scattered around. Always interesting to cross paths with someone who might know them.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's quite a fascinating combination, chef and wine connoisseur. An adventurous palate, I'd say! As for me, I'm a software developer. Didn't go to Winona State University by any chance, did you? A couple of my friends studied there. On a culinary note, I've also experimented in the kitchen myself and can whip up a pretty good meal!\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Haha, seems we both have passion for the culinary arts indeed, Samuel. No, I didn't go to Winona State University, but speaking of universities, I've got a good friend Dave who went to the University of the South, Sewanee. Also knowing some people from Louisiana State and Alabama's Auburn University... Just a thought, you might know one of them through work maybe? Any chance you have ever worked with a large telecom company or, let's say, in the energy sector?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Actually, as a matter of fact, I do know someone who works at a large telecom company. A friend of mine, Mable, from the University of the South, Sewanee, she works over at BellSouth. You wouldn't happen to know her, would you? As for the energy sector, can't say that rings a bell, but most of us in software end up working in quite a variety of industries!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nSamuel Anderson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMable: School: Sewanee, University of the South Company: BellSouth \nLolita: School: Winona State University Company: ONEOK \nCatherine: School: Utah Valley State College Company: Lincoln Industries \nVita: School: Winona State University Company: Erickson Air-Crane \nBrandon: School: Winona State University Company: The Greenbrier Companies \nDon: School: Clark University Company: MetLife \nAlvin: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Vectren \nTara: School: Kansas Wesleyan University Company: Gentiva Health Services \nArlene: School: Kansas Wesleyan University Company: BellSouth \n\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Hendrick, nice to meet you! What a great party, huh? So, what do you do for a living?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lovely to meet you too, Samuel! I'm actually a chef, quite a thrilling job I must say, and I also host monthly wine-tasting events. By the way, you wouldn't happen to have gone to any particular universities or worked at certain companies, have you? I've got some friends scattered around. Always interesting to cross paths with someone who might know them.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's quite a fascinating combination, chef and wine connoisseur. An adventurous palate, I'd say! As for me, I'm a software developer. Didn't go to Winona State University by any chance, did you? A couple of my friends studied there. On a culinary note, I've also experimented in the kitchen myself and can whip up a pretty good meal!\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Haha, seems we both have passion for the culinary arts indeed, Samuel. No, I didn't go to Winona State University, but speaking of universities, I've got a good friend Dave who went to the University of the South, Sewanee. Also knowing some people from Louisiana State and Alabama's Auburn University... Just a thought, you might know one of them through work maybe? Any chance you have ever worked with a large telecom company or, let's say, in the energy sector?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Actually, as a matter of fact, I do know someone who works at a large telecom company. A friend of mine, Mable, from the University of the South, Sewanee, she works over at BellSouth. You wouldn't happen to know her, would you? As for the energy sector, can't say that rings a bell, but most of us in software end up working in quite a variety of industries!\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I do have a friend named Dave who went to the University of the South, Sewanee and currently works at BellSouth. Same person you know as Mable, perhaps? Small world, isn't it? On another note, from software development to culinary experiments, that's quite a range, Samuel. I admire your versatility! Any favorite dish you've mastered so far?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sure, I suppose it could be the Mable you're referring to! What a small world indeed. As for my favorite dish, I'm rather proficient in creating a linguine with clam sauce. I've honed the recipe over the years and it never fails to impress. How about you, Hendrick? Any signature creations in your kitchen?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nSamuel Anderson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMable: School: Sewanee, University of the South Company: BellSouth \nLolita: School: Winona State University Company: ONEOK \nCatherine: School: Utah Valley State College Company: Lincoln Industries \nVita: School: Winona State University Company: Erickson Air-Crane \nBrandon: School: Winona State University Company: The Greenbrier Companies \nDon: School: Clark University Company: MetLife \nAlvin: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Vectren \nTara: School: Kansas Wesleyan University Company: Gentiva Health Services \nArlene: School: Kansas Wesleyan University Company: BellSouth \n\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Hendrick, nice to meet you! What a great party, huh? So, what do you do for a living?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lovely to meet you too, Samuel! I'm actually a chef, quite a thrilling job I must say, and I also host monthly wine-tasting events. By the way, you wouldn't happen to have gone to any particular universities or worked at certain companies, have you? I've got some friends scattered around. Always interesting to cross paths with someone who might know them.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's quite a fascinating combination, chef and wine connoisseur. An adventurous palate, I'd say! As for me, I'm a software developer. Didn't go to Winona State University by any chance, did you? A couple of my friends studied there. On a culinary note, I've also experimented in the kitchen myself and can whip up a pretty good meal!\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Haha, seems we both have passion for the culinary arts indeed, Samuel. No, I didn't go to Winona State University, but speaking of universities, I've got a good friend Dave who went to the University of the South, Sewanee. Also knowing some people from Louisiana State and Alabama's Auburn University... Just a thought, you might know one of them through work maybe? Any chance you have ever worked with a large telecom company or, let's say, in the energy sector?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Actually, as a matter of fact, I do know someone who works at a large telecom company. A friend of mine, Mable, from the University of the South, Sewanee, she works over at BellSouth. You wouldn't happen to know her, would you? As for the energy sector, can't say that rings a bell, but most of us in software end up working in quite a variety of industries!\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I do have a friend named Dave who went to the University of the South, Sewanee and currently works at BellSouth. Same person you know as Mable, perhaps? Small world, isn't it? On another note, from software development to culinary experiments, that's quite a range, Samuel. I admire your versatility! Any favorite dish you've mastered so far?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sure, I suppose it could be the Mable you're referring to! What a small world indeed. As for my favorite dish, I'm rather proficient in creating a linguine with clam sauce. I've honed the recipe over the years and it never fails to impress. How about you, Hendrick? Any signature creations in your kitchen?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Linguine with clam sauce sounds delightful, Samuel. My kitchen sees a lot of international flavors, but my signature creation would be a traditional German Sauerbraten. It's a pot roast that requires a lot of patience to marinate and slow-cook. Nevertheless, the result is always worth the effort. By the way, you mentioned BellSouth earlier, I've also known a Timothy there, just wondering if you've cross paths with him?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sauerbraten sounds wonderful, Hendrick! It speaks volumes about your dedication to your craft. As for Timothy at BellSouth, the name doesn't ring a bell, but given how big the company is, there's always a chance we may have crossed paths. Perhaps, Mable knows him!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nSamuel Anderson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMable: School: Sewanee, University of the South Company: BellSouth \nLolita: School: Winona State University Company: ONEOK \nCatherine: School: Utah Valley State College Company: Lincoln Industries \nVita: School: Winona State University Company: Erickson Air-Crane \nBrandon: School: Winona State University Company: The Greenbrier Companies \nDon: School: Clark University Company: MetLife \nAlvin: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Vectren \nTara: School: Kansas Wesleyan University Company: Gentiva Health Services \nArlene: School: Kansas Wesleyan University Company: BellSouth \n\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Hendrick, nice to meet you! What a great party, huh? So, what do you do for a living?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lovely to meet you too, Samuel! I'm actually a chef, quite a thrilling job I must say, and I also host monthly wine-tasting events. By the way, you wouldn't happen to have gone to any particular universities or worked at certain companies, have you? I've got some friends scattered around. Always interesting to cross paths with someone who might know them.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's quite a fascinating combination, chef and wine connoisseur. An adventurous palate, I'd say! As for me, I'm a software developer. Didn't go to Winona State University by any chance, did you? A couple of my friends studied there. On a culinary note, I've also experimented in the kitchen myself and can whip up a pretty good meal!\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Haha, seems we both have passion for the culinary arts indeed, Samuel. No, I didn't go to Winona State University, but speaking of universities, I've got a good friend Dave who went to the University of the South, Sewanee. Also knowing some people from Louisiana State and Alabama's Auburn University... Just a thought, you might know one of them through work maybe? Any chance you have ever worked with a large telecom company or, let's say, in the energy sector?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Actually, as a matter of fact, I do know someone who works at a large telecom company. A friend of mine, Mable, from the University of the South, Sewanee, she works over at BellSouth. You wouldn't happen to know her, would you? As for the energy sector, can't say that rings a bell, but most of us in software end up working in quite a variety of industries!\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I do have a friend named Dave who went to the University of the South, Sewanee and currently works at BellSouth. Same person you know as Mable, perhaps? Small world, isn't it? On another note, from software development to culinary experiments, that's quite a range, Samuel. I admire your versatility! Any favorite dish you've mastered so far?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sure, I suppose it could be the Mable you're referring to! What a small world indeed. As for my favorite dish, I'm rather proficient in creating a linguine with clam sauce. I've honed the recipe over the years and it never fails to impress. How about you, Hendrick? Any signature creations in your kitchen?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Linguine with clam sauce sounds delightful, Samuel. My kitchen sees a lot of international flavors, but my signature creation would be a traditional German Sauerbraten. It's a pot roast that requires a lot of patience to marinate and slow-cook. Nevertheless, the result is always worth the effort. By the way, you mentioned BellSouth earlier, I've also known a Timothy there, just wondering if you've cross paths with him?\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sauerbraten sounds wonderful, Hendrick! It speaks volumes about your dedication to your craft. As for Timothy at BellSouth, the name doesn't ring a bell, but given how big the company is, there's always a chance we may have crossed paths. Perhaps, Mable knows him!\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ah, well it's always a possibility. Telecom companies can be quite large indeed. Speaking of Mable, you mentioned she graduated from the University of the South, Sewanee. Have you visited her there, by any chance? The campus is quite lovely from what I've heard. Or perhaps you've visited other universities or locations with your line of work?\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Indeed, Hendrick, I've heard the Sewanee campus is quite something and I'd love to visit someday, given the opportunity. In terms of work-related travel, I've mainly attended tech conventions and the like, some in different parts of the country. Have you ever been to any events related to the healthcare sector? Another friend of mine, Arlene, she studied at Kansas Wesleyan University and now works at Gentiva Health Services. She often attends healthcare conferences, so I thought it might be a good point of connection.\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Well, can't say I've been to healthcare conferences, Samuel. My visits relate mostly to vineyards, restaurants and culinary extravaganzas! However, I am fairly connected in the investing arena, courtesy my friends who've ventured into that field. Perhaps Arlene's path might've crossed with someone from Sequoia Capital or U.S. Venture Partners? They do have a hand in many sectors after all!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Interesting, I'll have to ask her if her work had any overlap with those investment firms. Well Hendrick, it has been a pleasure talking to you. Who knew we might know the same person! We'll have to catch up again and exchange more stories and recipes!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nSamuel Anderson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMable: School: Sewanee, University of the South Company: BellSouth \nLolita: School: Winona State University Company: ONEOK \nCatherine: School: Utah Valley State College Company: Lincoln Industries \nVita: School: Winona State University Company: Erickson Air-Crane \nBrandon: School: Winona State University Company: The Greenbrier Companies \nDon: School: Clark University Company: MetLife \nAlvin: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Vectren \nTara: School: Kansas Wesleyan University Company: Gentiva Health Services \nArlene: School: Kansas Wesleyan University Company: BellSouth \n\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Hendrick, nice to meet you! What a great party, huh? So, what do you do for a living?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lovely to meet you too, Samuel! I'm actually a chef, quite a thrilling job I must say, and I also host monthly wine-tasting events. By the way, you wouldn't happen to have gone to any particular universities or worked at certain companies, have you? I've got some friends scattered around. Always interesting to cross paths with someone who might know them.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's quite a fascinating combination, chef and wine connoisseur. An adventurous palate, I'd say! As for me, I'm a software developer. Didn't go to Winona State University by any chance, did you? A couple of my friends studied there. On a culinary note, I've also experimented in the kitchen myself and can whip up a pretty good meal!\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Haha, seems we both have passion for the culinary arts indeed, Samuel. No, I didn't go to Winona State University, but speaking of universities, I've got a good friend Dave who went to the University of the South, Sewanee. Also knowing some people from Louisiana State and Alabama's Auburn University... Just a thought, you might know one of them through work maybe? Any chance you have ever worked with a large telecom company or, let's say, in the energy sector?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Actually, as a matter of fact, I do know someone who works at a large telecom company. A friend of mine, Mable, from the University of the South, Sewanee, she works over at BellSouth. You wouldn't happen to know her, would you? As for the energy sector, can't say that rings a bell, but most of us in software end up working in quite a variety of industries!\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I do have a friend named Dave who went to the University of the South, Sewanee and currently works at BellSouth. Same person you know as Mable, perhaps? Small world, isn't it? On another note, from software development to culinary experiments, that's quite a range, Samuel. I admire your versatility! Any favorite dish you've mastered so far?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sure, I suppose it could be the Mable you're referring to! What a small world indeed. As for my favorite dish, I'm rather proficient in creating a linguine with clam sauce. I've honed the recipe over the years and it never fails to impress. How about you, Hendrick? Any signature creations in your kitchen?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Linguine with clam sauce sounds delightful, Samuel. My kitchen sees a lot of international flavors, but my signature creation would be a traditional German Sauerbraten. It's a pot roast that requires a lot of patience to marinate and slow-cook. Nevertheless, the result is always worth the effort. By the way, you mentioned BellSouth earlier, I've also known a Timothy there, just wondering if you've cross paths with him?\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sauerbraten sounds wonderful, Hendrick! It speaks volumes about your dedication to your craft. As for Timothy at BellSouth, the name doesn't ring a bell, but given how big the company is, there's always a chance we may have crossed paths. Perhaps, Mable knows him!\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ah, well it's always a possibility. Telecom companies can be quite large indeed. Speaking of Mable, you mentioned she graduated from the University of the South, Sewanee. Have you visited her there, by any chance? The campus is quite lovely from what I've heard. Or perhaps you've visited other universities or locations with your line of work?\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Indeed, Hendrick, I've heard the Sewanee campus is quite something and I'd love to visit someday, given the opportunity. In terms of work-related travel, I've mainly attended tech conventions and the like, some in different parts of the country. Have you ever been to any events related to the healthcare sector? Another friend of mine, Arlene, she studied at Kansas Wesleyan University and now works at Gentiva Health Services. She often attends healthcare conferences, so I thought it might be a good point of connection.\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Well, can't say I've been to healthcare conferences, Samuel. My visits relate mostly to vineyards, restaurants and culinary extravaganzas! However, I am fairly connected in the investing arena, courtesy my friends who've ventured into that field. Perhaps Arlene's path might've crossed with someone from Sequoia Capital or U.S. Venture Partners? They do have a hand in many sectors after all!\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"Interesting, I'll have to ask her if her work had any overlap with those investment firms. Well Hendrick, it has been a pleasure talking to you. Who knew we might know the same person! We'll have to catch up again and exchange more stories and recipes!\"\n\nTurn #13: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Samuel! We'll have to chip away at that Six Degrees of Separation, we're probably closer than we think. And I'm looking forward to swapping those recipes. Have a great evening and enjoy the party!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDave: School: Sewanee, University of the South Company: BellSouth \nTimothy: School: Louisiana State University Company: BellSouth \nLeona: School: Coe College Company: Franklin Templeton \nAlvin: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Vectren \nKarissa: School: Saint John's University Company: U.S. Venture Partners \nStephanie: School: Coe College Company: Sequoia Capital \nKathy: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Estes Industries \nMonica: School: Coe College Company: The Greenbrier Companies \nBlanche: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Oakley, Inc.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Hendrick, nice to meet you! What a great party, huh? So, what do you do for a living?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Lovely to meet you too, Samuel! I'm actually a chef, quite a thrilling job I must say, and I also host monthly wine-tasting events. By the way, you wouldn't happen to have gone to any particular universities or worked at certain companies, have you? I've got some friends scattered around. Always interesting to cross paths with someone who might know them.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDave: School: Sewanee, University of the South Company: BellSouth \nTimothy: School: Louisiana State University Company: BellSouth \nLeona: School: Coe College Company: Franklin Templeton \nAlvin: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Vectren \nKarissa: School: Saint John's University Company: U.S. Venture Partners \nStephanie: School: Coe College Company: Sequoia Capital \nKathy: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Estes Industries \nMonica: School: Coe College Company: The Greenbrier Companies \nBlanche: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Oakley, Inc.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Hendrick, nice to meet you! What a great party, huh? So, what do you do for a living?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lovely to meet you too, Samuel! I'm actually a chef, quite a thrilling job I must say, and I also host monthly wine-tasting events. By the way, you wouldn't happen to have gone to any particular universities or worked at certain companies, have you? I've got some friends scattered around. Always interesting to cross paths with someone who might know them.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's quite a fascinating combination, chef and wine connoisseur. An adventurous palate, I'd say! As for me, I'm a software developer. Didn't go to Winona State University by any chance, did you? A couple of my friends studied there. On a culinary note, I've also experimented in the kitchen myself and can whip up a pretty good meal!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Haha, seems we both have passion for the culinary arts indeed, Samuel. No, I didn't go to Winona State University, but speaking of universities, I've got a good friend Dave who went to the University of the South, Sewanee. Also knowing some people from Louisiana State and Alabama's Auburn University... Just a thought, you might know one of them through work maybe? Any chance you have ever worked with a large telecom company or, let's say, in the energy sector?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDave: School: Sewanee, University of the South Company: BellSouth \nTimothy: School: Louisiana State University Company: BellSouth \nLeona: School: Coe College Company: Franklin Templeton \nAlvin: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Vectren \nKarissa: School: Saint John's University Company: U.S. Venture Partners \nStephanie: School: Coe College Company: Sequoia Capital \nKathy: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Estes Industries \nMonica: School: Coe College Company: The Greenbrier Companies \nBlanche: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Oakley, Inc.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Hendrick, nice to meet you! What a great party, huh? So, what do you do for a living?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lovely to meet you too, Samuel! I'm actually a chef, quite a thrilling job I must say, and I also host monthly wine-tasting events. By the way, you wouldn't happen to have gone to any particular universities or worked at certain companies, have you? I've got some friends scattered around. Always interesting to cross paths with someone who might know them.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's quite a fascinating combination, chef and wine connoisseur. An adventurous palate, I'd say! As for me, I'm a software developer. Didn't go to Winona State University by any chance, did you? A couple of my friends studied there. On a culinary note, I've also experimented in the kitchen myself and can whip up a pretty good meal!\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Haha, seems we both have passion for the culinary arts indeed, Samuel. No, I didn't go to Winona State University, but speaking of universities, I've got a good friend Dave who went to the University of the South, Sewanee. Also knowing some people from Louisiana State and Alabama's Auburn University... Just a thought, you might know one of them through work maybe? Any chance you have ever worked with a large telecom company or, let's say, in the energy sector?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Actually, as a matter of fact, I do know someone who works at a large telecom company. A friend of mine, Mable, from the University of the South, Sewanee, she works over at BellSouth. You wouldn't happen to know her, would you? As for the energy sector, can't say that rings a bell, but most of us in software end up working in quite a variety of industries!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I do have a friend named Dave who went to the University of the South, Sewanee and currently works at BellSouth. Same person you know as Mable, perhaps? Small world, isn't it? On another note, from software development to culinary experiments, that's quite a range, Samuel. I admire your versatility! Any favorite dish you've mastered so far?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nSamuel Anderson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMable: School: Sewanee, University of the South Company: BellSouth \nLolita: School: Winona State University Company: ONEOK \nCatherine: School: Utah Valley State College Company: Lincoln Industries \nVita: School: Winona State University Company: Erickson Air-Crane \nBrandon: School: Winona State University Company: The Greenbrier Companies \nDon: School: Clark University Company: MetLife \nAlvin: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Vectren \nTara: School: Kansas Wesleyan University Company: Gentiva Health Services \nArlene: School: Kansas Wesleyan University Company: BellSouth \n\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Hendrick, nice to meet you! What a great party, huh? So, what do you do for a living?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lovely to meet you too, Samuel! I'm actually a chef, quite a thrilling job I must say, and I also host monthly wine-tasting events. By the way, you wouldn't happen to have gone to any particular universities or worked at certain companies, have you? I've got some friends scattered around. Always interesting to cross paths with someone who might know them.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's quite a fascinating combination, chef and wine connoisseur. An adventurous palate, I'd say! As for me, I'm a software developer. Didn't go to Winona State University by any chance, did you? A couple of my friends studied there. On a culinary note, I've also experimented in the kitchen myself and can whip up a pretty good meal!\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Haha, seems we both have passion for the culinary arts indeed, Samuel. No, I didn't go to Winona State University, but speaking of universities, I've got a good friend Dave who went to the University of the South, Sewanee. Also knowing some people from Louisiana State and Alabama's Auburn University... Just a thought, you might know one of them through work maybe? Any chance you have ever worked with a large telecom company or, let's say, in the energy sector?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Actually, as a matter of fact, I do know someone who works at a large telecom company. A friend of mine, Mable, from the University of the South, Sewanee, she works over at BellSouth. You wouldn't happen to know her, would you? As for the energy sector, can't say that rings a bell, but most of us in software end up working in quite a variety of industries!\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I do have a friend named Dave who went to the University of the South, Sewanee and currently works at BellSouth. Same person you know as Mable, perhaps? Small world, isn't it? On another note, from software development to culinary experiments, that's quite a range, Samuel. I admire your versatility! Any favorite dish you've mastered so far?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sure, I suppose it could be the Mable you're referring to! What a small world indeed. As for my favorite dish, I'm rather proficient in creating a linguine with clam sauce. I've honed the recipe over the years and it never fails to impress. How about you, Hendrick? Any signature creations in your kitchen?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Linguine with clam sauce sounds delightful, Samuel. My kitchen sees a lot of international flavors, but my signature creation would be a traditional German Sauerbraten. It's a pot roast that requires a lot of patience to marinate and slow-cook. Nevertheless, the result is always worth the effort. By the way, you mentioned BellSouth earlier, I've also known a Timothy there, just wondering if you've cross paths with him?\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sauerbraten sounds wonderful, Hendrick! It speaks volumes about your dedication to your craft. As for Timothy at BellSouth, the name doesn't ring a bell, but given how big the company is, there's always a chance we may have crossed paths. Perhaps, Mable knows him!\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ah, well it's always a possibility. Telecom companies can be quite large indeed. Speaking of Mable, you mentioned she graduated from the University of the South, Sewanee. Have you visited her there, by any chance? The campus is quite lovely from what I've heard. Or perhaps you've visited other universities or locations with your line of work?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, Hendrick, I've heard the Sewanee campus is quite something and I'd love to visit someday, given the opportunity. In terms of work-related travel, I've mainly attended tech conventions and the like, some in different parts of the country. Have you ever been to any events related to the healthcare sector? Another friend of mine, Arlene, she studied at Kansas Wesleyan University and now works at Gentiva Health Services. She often attends healthcare conferences, so I thought it might be a good point of connection.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDave: School: Sewanee, University of the South Company: BellSouth \nTimothy: School: Louisiana State University Company: BellSouth \nLeona: School: Coe College Company: Franklin Templeton \nAlvin: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Vectren \nKarissa: School: Saint John's University Company: U.S. Venture Partners \nStephanie: School: Coe College Company: Sequoia Capital \nKathy: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Estes Industries \nMonica: School: Coe College Company: The Greenbrier Companies \nBlanche: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Oakley, Inc.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Hendrick, nice to meet you! What a great party, huh? So, what do you do for a living?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lovely to meet you too, Samuel! I'm actually a chef, quite a thrilling job I must say, and I also host monthly wine-tasting events. By the way, you wouldn't happen to have gone to any particular universities or worked at certain companies, have you? I've got some friends scattered around. Always interesting to cross paths with someone who might know them.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's quite a fascinating combination, chef and wine connoisseur. An adventurous palate, I'd say! As for me, I'm a software developer. Didn't go to Winona State University by any chance, did you? A couple of my friends studied there. On a culinary note, I've also experimented in the kitchen myself and can whip up a pretty good meal!\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Haha, seems we both have passion for the culinary arts indeed, Samuel. No, I didn't go to Winona State University, but speaking of universities, I've got a good friend Dave who went to the University of the South, Sewanee. Also knowing some people from Louisiana State and Alabama's Auburn University... Just a thought, you might know one of them through work maybe? Any chance you have ever worked with a large telecom company or, let's say, in the energy sector?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Actually, as a matter of fact, I do know someone who works at a large telecom company. A friend of mine, Mable, from the University of the South, Sewanee, she works over at BellSouth. You wouldn't happen to know her, would you? As for the energy sector, can't say that rings a bell, but most of us in software end up working in quite a variety of industries!\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I do have a friend named Dave who went to the University of the South, Sewanee and currently works at BellSouth. Same person you know as Mable, perhaps? Small world, isn't it? On another note, from software development to culinary experiments, that's quite a range, Samuel. I admire your versatility! Any favorite dish you've mastered so far?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sure, I suppose it could be the Mable you're referring to! What a small world indeed. As for my favorite dish, I'm rather proficient in creating a linguine with clam sauce. I've honed the recipe over the years and it never fails to impress. How about you, Hendrick? Any signature creations in your kitchen?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Linguine with clam sauce sounds delightful, Samuel. My kitchen sees a lot of international flavors, but my signature creation would be a traditional German Sauerbraten. It's a pot roast that requires a lot of patience to marinate and slow-cook. Nevertheless, the result is always worth the effort. By the way, you mentioned BellSouth earlier, I've also known a Timothy there, just wondering if you've cross paths with him?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDave: School: Sewanee, University of the South Company: BellSouth \nTimothy: School: Louisiana State University Company: BellSouth \nLeona: School: Coe College Company: Franklin Templeton \nAlvin: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Vectren \nKarissa: School: Saint John's University Company: U.S. Venture Partners \nStephanie: School: Coe College Company: Sequoia Capital \nKathy: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Estes Industries \nMonica: School: Coe College Company: The Greenbrier Companies \nBlanche: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Oakley, Inc.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Hendrick, nice to meet you! What a great party, huh? So, what do you do for a living?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lovely to meet you too, Samuel! I'm actually a chef, quite a thrilling job I must say, and I also host monthly wine-tasting events. By the way, you wouldn't happen to have gone to any particular universities or worked at certain companies, have you? I've got some friends scattered around. Always interesting to cross paths with someone who might know them.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's quite a fascinating combination, chef and wine connoisseur. An adventurous palate, I'd say! As for me, I'm a software developer. Didn't go to Winona State University by any chance, did you? A couple of my friends studied there. On a culinary note, I've also experimented in the kitchen myself and can whip up a pretty good meal!\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Haha, seems we both have passion for the culinary arts indeed, Samuel. No, I didn't go to Winona State University, but speaking of universities, I've got a good friend Dave who went to the University of the South, Sewanee. Also knowing some people from Louisiana State and Alabama's Auburn University... Just a thought, you might know one of them through work maybe? Any chance you have ever worked with a large telecom company or, let's say, in the energy sector?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Actually, as a matter of fact, I do know someone who works at a large telecom company. A friend of mine, Mable, from the University of the South, Sewanee, she works over at BellSouth. You wouldn't happen to know her, would you? As for the energy sector, can't say that rings a bell, but most of us in software end up working in quite a variety of industries!\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I do have a friend named Dave who went to the University of the South, Sewanee and currently works at BellSouth. Same person you know as Mable, perhaps? Small world, isn't it? On another note, from software development to culinary experiments, that's quite a range, Samuel. I admire your versatility! Any favorite dish you've mastered so far?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sure, I suppose it could be the Mable you're referring to! What a small world indeed. As for my favorite dish, I'm rather proficient in creating a linguine with clam sauce. I've honed the recipe over the years and it never fails to impress. How about you, Hendrick? Any signature creations in your kitchen?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Linguine with clam sauce sounds delightful, Samuel. My kitchen sees a lot of international flavors, but my signature creation would be a traditional German Sauerbraten. It's a pot roast that requires a lot of patience to marinate and slow-cook. Nevertheless, the result is always worth the effort. By the way, you mentioned BellSouth earlier, I've also known a Timothy there, just wondering if you've cross paths with him?\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sauerbraten sounds wonderful, Hendrick! It speaks volumes about your dedication to your craft. As for Timothy at BellSouth, the name doesn't ring a bell, but given how big the company is, there's always a chance we may have crossed paths. Perhaps, Mable knows him!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ah, well it's always a possibility. Telecom companies can be quite large indeed. Speaking of Mable, you mentioned she graduated from the University of the South, Sewanee. Have you visited her there, by any chance? The campus is quite lovely from what I've heard. Or perhaps you've visited other universities or locations with your line of work?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDave: School: Sewanee, University of the South Company: BellSouth \nTimothy: School: Louisiana State University Company: BellSouth \nLeona: School: Coe College Company: Franklin Templeton \nAlvin: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Vectren \nKarissa: School: Saint John's University Company: U.S. Venture Partners \nStephanie: School: Coe College Company: Sequoia Capital \nKathy: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Estes Industries \nMonica: School: Coe College Company: The Greenbrier Companies \nBlanche: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Oakley, Inc.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Hendrick, nice to meet you! What a great party, huh? So, what do you do for a living?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lovely to meet you too, Samuel! I'm actually a chef, quite a thrilling job I must say, and I also host monthly wine-tasting events. By the way, you wouldn't happen to have gone to any particular universities or worked at certain companies, have you? I've got some friends scattered around. Always interesting to cross paths with someone who might know them.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's quite a fascinating combination, chef and wine connoisseur. An adventurous palate, I'd say! As for me, I'm a software developer. Didn't go to Winona State University by any chance, did you? A couple of my friends studied there. On a culinary note, I've also experimented in the kitchen myself and can whip up a pretty good meal!\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Haha, seems we both have passion for the culinary arts indeed, Samuel. No, I didn't go to Winona State University, but speaking of universities, I've got a good friend Dave who went to the University of the South, Sewanee. Also knowing some people from Louisiana State and Alabama's Auburn University... Just a thought, you might know one of them through work maybe? Any chance you have ever worked with a large telecom company or, let's say, in the energy sector?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Actually, as a matter of fact, I do know someone who works at a large telecom company. A friend of mine, Mable, from the University of the South, Sewanee, she works over at BellSouth. You wouldn't happen to know her, would you? As for the energy sector, can't say that rings a bell, but most of us in software end up working in quite a variety of industries!\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I do have a friend named Dave who went to the University of the South, Sewanee and currently works at BellSouth. Same person you know as Mable, perhaps? Small world, isn't it? On another note, from software development to culinary experiments, that's quite a range, Samuel. I admire your versatility! Any favorite dish you've mastered so far?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sure, I suppose it could be the Mable you're referring to! What a small world indeed. As for my favorite dish, I'm rather proficient in creating a linguine with clam sauce. I've honed the recipe over the years and it never fails to impress. How about you, Hendrick? Any signature creations in your kitchen?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Linguine with clam sauce sounds delightful, Samuel. My kitchen sees a lot of international flavors, but my signature creation would be a traditional German Sauerbraten. It's a pot roast that requires a lot of patience to marinate and slow-cook. Nevertheless, the result is always worth the effort. By the way, you mentioned BellSouth earlier, I've also known a Timothy there, just wondering if you've cross paths with him?\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sauerbraten sounds wonderful, Hendrick! It speaks volumes about your dedication to your craft. As for Timothy at BellSouth, the name doesn't ring a bell, but given how big the company is, there's always a chance we may have crossed paths. Perhaps, Mable knows him!\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ah, well it's always a possibility. Telecom companies can be quite large indeed. Speaking of Mable, you mentioned she graduated from the University of the South, Sewanee. Have you visited her there, by any chance? The campus is quite lovely from what I've heard. Or perhaps you've visited other universities or locations with your line of work?\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Indeed, Hendrick, I've heard the Sewanee campus is quite something and I'd love to visit someday, given the opportunity. In terms of work-related travel, I've mainly attended tech conventions and the like, some in different parts of the country. Have you ever been to any events related to the healthcare sector? Another friend of mine, Arlene, she studied at Kansas Wesleyan University and now works at Gentiva Health Services. She often attends healthcare conferences, so I thought it might be a good point of connection.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Well, can't say I've been to healthcare conferences, Samuel. My visits relate mostly to vineyards, restaurants and culinary extravaganzas! However, I am fairly connected in the investing arena, courtesy my friends who've ventured into that field. Perhaps Arlene's path might've crossed with someone from Sequoia Capital or U.S. Venture Partners? They do have a hand in many sectors after all!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDave: School: Sewanee, University of the South Company: BellSouth \nTimothy: School: Louisiana State University Company: BellSouth \nLeona: School: Coe College Company: Franklin Templeton \nAlvin: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Vectren \nKarissa: School: Saint John's University Company: U.S. Venture Partners \nStephanie: School: Coe College Company: Sequoia Capital \nKathy: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Estes Industries \nMonica: School: Coe College Company: The Greenbrier Companies \nBlanche: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Oakley, Inc.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Hendrick, nice to meet you! What a great party, huh? So, what do you do for a living?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lovely to meet you too, Samuel! I'm actually a chef, quite a thrilling job I must say, and I also host monthly wine-tasting events. By the way, you wouldn't happen to have gone to any particular universities or worked at certain companies, have you? I've got some friends scattered around. Always interesting to cross paths with someone who might know them.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's quite a fascinating combination, chef and wine connoisseur. An adventurous palate, I'd say! As for me, I'm a software developer. Didn't go to Winona State University by any chance, did you? A couple of my friends studied there. On a culinary note, I've also experimented in the kitchen myself and can whip up a pretty good meal!\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Haha, seems we both have passion for the culinary arts indeed, Samuel. No, I didn't go to Winona State University, but speaking of universities, I've got a good friend Dave who went to the University of the South, Sewanee. Also knowing some people from Louisiana State and Alabama's Auburn University... Just a thought, you might know one of them through work maybe? Any chance you have ever worked with a large telecom company or, let's say, in the energy sector?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Actually, as a matter of fact, I do know someone who works at a large telecom company. A friend of mine, Mable, from the University of the South, Sewanee, she works over at BellSouth. You wouldn't happen to know her, would you? As for the energy sector, can't say that rings a bell, but most of us in software end up working in quite a variety of industries!\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I do have a friend named Dave who went to the University of the South, Sewanee and currently works at BellSouth. Same person you know as Mable, perhaps? Small world, isn't it? On another note, from software development to culinary experiments, that's quite a range, Samuel. I admire your versatility! Any favorite dish you've mastered so far?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sure, I suppose it could be the Mable you're referring to! What a small world indeed. As for my favorite dish, I'm rather proficient in creating a linguine with clam sauce. I've honed the recipe over the years and it never fails to impress. How about you, Hendrick? Any signature creations in your kitchen?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Linguine with clam sauce sounds delightful, Samuel. My kitchen sees a lot of international flavors, but my signature creation would be a traditional German Sauerbraten. It's a pot roast that requires a lot of patience to marinate and slow-cook. Nevertheless, the result is always worth the effort. By the way, you mentioned BellSouth earlier, I've also known a Timothy there, just wondering if you've cross paths with him?\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sauerbraten sounds wonderful, Hendrick! It speaks volumes about your dedication to your craft. As for Timothy at BellSouth, the name doesn't ring a bell, but given how big the company is, there's always a chance we may have crossed paths. Perhaps, Mable knows him!\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ah, well it's always a possibility. Telecom companies can be quite large indeed. Speaking of Mable, you mentioned she graduated from the University of the South, Sewanee. Have you visited her there, by any chance? The campus is quite lovely from what I've heard. Or perhaps you've visited other universities or locations with your line of work?\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Indeed, Hendrick, I've heard the Sewanee campus is quite something and I'd love to visit someday, given the opportunity. In terms of work-related travel, I've mainly attended tech conventions and the like, some in different parts of the country. Have you ever been to any events related to the healthcare sector? Another friend of mine, Arlene, she studied at Kansas Wesleyan University and now works at Gentiva Health Services. She often attends healthcare conferences, so I thought it might be a good point of connection.\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Well, can't say I've been to healthcare conferences, Samuel. My visits relate mostly to vineyards, restaurants and culinary extravaganzas! However, I am fairly connected in the investing arena, courtesy my friends who've ventured into that field. Perhaps Arlene's path might've crossed with someone from Sequoia Capital or U.S. Venture Partners? They do have a hand in many sectors after all!\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"Interesting, I'll have to ask her if her work had any overlap with those investment firms. Well Hendrick, it has been a pleasure talking to you. Who knew we might know the same person! We'll have to catch up again and exchange more stories and recipes!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Samuel! We'll have to chip away at that Six Degrees of Separation, we're probably closer than we think. And I'm looking forward to swapping those recipes. Have a great evening and enjoy the party!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDave: School: Sewanee, University of the South Company: BellSouth \nTimothy: School: Louisiana State University Company: BellSouth \nLeona: School: Coe College Company: Franklin Templeton \nAlvin: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Vectren \nKarissa: School: Saint John's University Company: U.S. Venture Partners \nStephanie: School: Coe College Company: Sequoia Capital \nKathy: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Estes Industries \nMonica: School: Coe College Company: The Greenbrier Companies \nBlanche: School: Auburn University - Montgomery Company: Oakley, Inc.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey Hendrick, nice to meet you! What a great party, huh? So, what do you do for a living?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lovely to meet you too, Samuel! I'm actually a chef, quite a thrilling job I must say, and I also host monthly wine-tasting events. By the way, you wouldn't happen to have gone to any particular universities or worked at certain companies, have you? I've got some friends scattered around. Always interesting to cross paths with someone who might know them.\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's quite a fascinating combination, chef and wine connoisseur. An adventurous palate, I'd say! As for me, I'm a software developer. Didn't go to Winona State University by any chance, did you? A couple of my friends studied there. On a culinary note, I've also experimented in the kitchen myself and can whip up a pretty good meal!\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Haha, seems we both have passion for the culinary arts indeed, Samuel. No, I didn't go to Winona State University, but speaking of universities, I've got a good friend Dave who went to the University of the South, Sewanee. Also knowing some people from Louisiana State and Alabama's Auburn University... Just a thought, you might know one of them through work maybe? Any chance you have ever worked with a large telecom company or, let's say, in the energy sector?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Actually, as a matter of fact, I do know someone who works at a large telecom company. A friend of mine, Mable, from the University of the South, Sewanee, she works over at BellSouth. You wouldn't happen to know her, would you? As for the energy sector, can't say that rings a bell, but most of us in software end up working in quite a variety of industries!\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I do have a friend named Dave who went to the University of the South, Sewanee and currently works at BellSouth. Same person you know as Mable, perhaps? Small world, isn't it? On another note, from software development to culinary experiments, that's quite a range, Samuel. I admire your versatility! Any favorite dish you've mastered so far?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sure, I suppose it could be the Mable you're referring to! What a small world indeed. As for my favorite dish, I'm rather proficient in creating a linguine with clam sauce. I've honed the recipe over the years and it never fails to impress. How about you, Hendrick? Any signature creations in your kitchen?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Linguine with clam sauce sounds delightful, Samuel. My kitchen sees a lot of international flavors, but my signature creation would be a traditional German Sauerbraten. It's a pot roast that requires a lot of patience to marinate and slow-cook. Nevertheless, the result is always worth the effort. By the way, you mentioned BellSouth earlier, I've also known a Timothy there, just wondering if you've cross paths with him?\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sauerbraten sounds wonderful, Hendrick! It speaks volumes about your dedication to your craft. As for Timothy at BellSouth, the name doesn't ring a bell, but given how big the company is, there's always a chance we may have crossed paths. Perhaps, Mable knows him!\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ah, well it's always a possibility. Telecom companies can be quite large indeed. Speaking of Mable, you mentioned she graduated from the University of the South, Sewanee. Have you visited her there, by any chance? The campus is quite lovely from what I've heard. Or perhaps you've visited other universities or locations with your line of work?\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Indeed, Hendrick, I've heard the Sewanee campus is quite something and I'd love to visit someday, given the opportunity. In terms of work-related travel, I've mainly attended tech conventions and the like, some in different parts of the country. Have you ever been to any events related to the healthcare sector? Another friend of mine, Arlene, she studied at Kansas Wesleyan University and now works at Gentiva Health Services. She often attends healthcare conferences, so I thought it might be a good point of connection.\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Well, can't say I've been to healthcare conferences, Samuel. My visits relate mostly to vineyards, restaurants and culinary extravaganzas! However, I am fairly connected in the investing arena, courtesy my friends who've ventured into that field. Perhaps Arlene's path might've crossed with someone from Sequoia Capital or U.S. Venture Partners? They do have a hand in many sectors after all!\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"Interesting, I'll have to ask her if her work had any overlap with those investment firms. Well Hendrick, it has been a pleasure talking to you. Who knew we might know the same person! We'll have to catch up again and exchange more stories and recipes!\"\n\nTurn #13: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Samuel! We'll have to chip away at that Six Degrees of Separation, we're probably closer than we think. And I'm looking forward to swapping those recipes. Have a great evening and enjoy the party!\"\n\nTurn #14: Samuel Anderson left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Micah Stevens and Jaxon Prentice\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nJaxon Prentice's background: \nMicah Stevens's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDavid: Hobby: Vacation Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nChristopher: Hobby: Go Company: McKinsey & Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nLee: Hobby: Go Company: Groupon Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPamela: Hobby: Watching television Company: General Cable Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nPhillip: Hobby: Kayaking Company: Sauer-Danfoss Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nKristin: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nRafael: Hobby: Kayaking Company: General Cable Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nChad: Hobby: Foreign language learning Company: General Cable Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPhil: Hobby: Kayaking Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nConnie: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: General Cable Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nTommy: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \n\nJaxon Prentice's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hi there, I'm Micah. I couldn't help but notice your style, very sleek. It's an eye-catcher. You must be around someone who has a good sense of fashion, are you by any chance into hobbies like, let's say, kayaking or 'Go', the board game?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Micah Stevens and Jaxon Prentice\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nJaxon Prentice's background: \nMicah Stevens's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDavid: Hobby: Vacation Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nChristopher: Hobby: Go Company: McKinsey & Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nLee: Hobby: Go Company: Groupon Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPamela: Hobby: Watching television Company: General Cable Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nPhillip: Hobby: Kayaking Company: Sauer-Danfoss Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nKristin: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nRafael: Hobby: Kayaking Company: General Cable Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nChad: Hobby: Foreign language learning Company: General Cable Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPhil: Hobby: Kayaking Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nConnie: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: General Cable Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nTommy: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \n\nJaxon Prentice's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Micah Stevens said: \"Hi there, I'm Micah. I couldn't help but notice your style, very sleek. It's an eye-catcher. You must be around someone who has a good sense of fashion, are you by any chance into hobbies like, let's say, kayaking or 'Go', the board game?\"\n\nTurn #1: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Hello Micah, I'm Jaxon. I do admire a good kayaking experience, it's quite an adventure I must say. And about fashion, well, you could say there's some influence around me. I also spotted that you are an enthusiast of board games. Do you know someone named Rafael by any chance? He loves kayaking as well, works for a big cable company, and enjoys mornings, best time of the day for him to relax.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ah, Rafael! Yes, I believe I do know him. He's quite fond of the early hours, isn't he? Speaking of which, do you happen to have a friend who prefers the outdoors in the evening, perhaps even works at H. J. Heinz Company? Just curious, one of my friends who fits this description seems to know a lot of people.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Micah Stevens and Jaxon Prentice\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nJaxon Prentice's background: \nMicah Stevens's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDavid: Hobby: Vacation Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nChristopher: Hobby: Go Company: McKinsey & Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nLee: Hobby: Go Company: Groupon Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPamela: Hobby: Watching television Company: General Cable Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nPhillip: Hobby: Kayaking Company: Sauer-Danfoss Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nKristin: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nRafael: Hobby: Kayaking Company: General Cable Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nChad: Hobby: Foreign language learning Company: General Cable Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPhil: Hobby: Kayaking Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nConnie: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: General Cable Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nTommy: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \n\nJaxon Prentice's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Micah Stevens said: \"Hi there, I'm Micah. I couldn't help but notice your style, very sleek. It's an eye-catcher. You must be around someone who has a good sense of fashion, are you by any chance into hobbies like, let's say, kayaking or 'Go', the board game?\"\n\nTurn #1: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Hello Micah, I'm Jaxon. I do admire a good kayaking experience, it's quite an adventure I must say. And about fashion, well, you could say there's some influence around me. I also spotted that you are an enthusiast of board games. Do you know someone named Rafael by any chance? He loves kayaking as well, works for a big cable company, and enjoys mornings, best time of the day for him to relax.\"\n\nTurn #2: Micah Stevens said: \"Ah, Rafael! Yes, I believe I do know him. He's quite fond of the early hours, isn't he? Speaking of which, do you happen to have a friend who prefers the outdoors in the evening, perhaps even works at H. J. Heinz Company? Just curious, one of my friends who fits this description seems to know a lot of people.\"\n\nTurn #3: Jaxon Prentice said: \"An evening outdoor enthusiast at H. J. Heinz? Sorry, I don't think I know who that could be. However, I do have a friend Robin, who absolutely loves gaming and hanging outdoors but she's more of an evening person. Plus she works at a renowned firearms company. Does that sound familiar to you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Micah Stevens said: \"Hmm the description doesn't quite match. Perhaps we don't have this mutual friend after all. By the way, do you have any friends that love animal fancy as a hobby and enjoy their afternoons indoors? I know it's quite specific, but I find it so unique and I happen to know someone with these interests.\"\n\nTurn #5: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Animal fancy as a hobby, that's indeed unique! I can't say that it rings a bell though. My friend Robert likes to spend his afternoons indoors, but he is more into foraging, and he works for an international company in the refrigeration sector. I guess the uniqueness of hobbies is what keeps our social circles interesting, right?\"\n\nTurn #6: Micah Stevens said: \"Absolutely, Jaxon. The variety in hobbies indeed keeps our interactions colorful and exciting! Now, this may sound a bit strange, but do you know anyone who is into vacationing and has a knack for cooking sauces, maybe even works for a company that is famous for its ketchup? I only ask because I have a friend who fits this profile and he\u2019s quite the social butterfly.\"\n\nTurn #7: Jaxon Prentice said: \"That's a very specific description indeed, Micah! Unfortunately, I don't seem to know anyone who fits that particular profile. I do, however, have a friend named James who's an enthusiastic vacationer and works for a trendy clothing company. He loves the outdoors, especially in the mornings. Maybe they've crossed paths in their travels?\"\n\nTurn #8: Micah Stevens said: \"Ah, James, you said? The name does sound familiar, but I'm not too sure. He seems like an interesting fellow, though. Now, speaking of interesting, do you have any friends that are into learning foreign languages and prefer to spend their evenings indoors? I know it's a bit too specific, but I have an acquaintance who has this unique hobby.\"\n\nTurn #9: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Enjoying foreign languages, fascinating! I can't say I have friends with that particular interest though. Most of my friends are into outdoor morning activities. It's interesting how unique everyone's hobbies can be!\"\n\nTurn #10: Micah Stevens said: \"Indeed, it's the diversity that makes life enjoyable, Jaxon. By the way, do you happen to know someone who's employed by General Cable, prefers to stay indoors in the afternoon, and enjoys watching television? Just asking out of curiosity.\"\n\nTurn #11: Jaxon Prentice said: \"General Cable and an afternoon television enthusiast? That's definitely ringing a bell. Might be thinking of my friend Rafael, though he's more of a kayaking enthusiast than a television watcher. Small world, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #12: Micah Stevens said: \"Oh, Rafael seems like a pretty versatile guy! Talking of the indoors, do you know someone who likes to play 'Go', the board game, in the evenings and works for an international management consulting firm? Just a thought, no harm in asking.\"\n\nTurn #13: Jaxon Prentice said: \"'Go' the board game, and working for an international management consulting firm? I'm afraid that doesn't ring a bell. I do have friends who like board games, but none who fits this exact description. It's fascinating to see how varied the interests of people can be, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #14: Micah Stevens said: \"You're absolutely right, Jaxon. It's the different hobbies and interests that make social connections so enriching. By the way, do you happen to know anyone who loves animal fancy, spends their afternoons indoors, and works in a company known for its ketchup?\"\n\nTurn #15: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Animal fancy, indoor afternoons, and a company known for its ketchup? You have quite a unique set of friends, Micah, but as it happens, none of mine match that description. It's certainly an intriguing combination of interests and occupation, though.\"\n\nTurn #16: Micah Stevens said: \"It sure is! This chat has been quite an enjoyable diversion. By any chance, do you have a friend who gets their kicks from kayaking and works somewhere famous for their hydraulics, maybe an outdoor person who enjoys the afternoon?\"\n\nTurn #17: Jaxon Prentice said: \"An afternoon kayak enthusiast who works with hydraulics, that does sound like Wanda! She's an executive at a company known for its hydraulic machinery. Her perfect day starts with some intense weightlifting, and she takes advantage of the beautiful weather in the afternoons for her passion - kayaking. Now, isn't that something?\"\n\nTurn #18: Micah Stevens said: \"Fascinating, Jaxon! Wanda seems like quite an interesting character. With people having such varied interests and hobbies, it really does make our social circles exciting! Still on the topic of friends, do you have any who love to play 'Go', the board game, and work for McKinsey & Company? I know it's a bit particular, but just trying to piece together a possible connection.\"\n\nTurn #19: Jaxon Prentice said: \"'Go', the board game, and McKinsey & Company, that's rather specific, Micah. Unfortunately, none of my friends fits that description. It does show how unique and intriguing everyone's interests can be though. Diversity truly makes our social tapestry more vibrant, doesn't it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #20. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, diversity is the key. Well, I was wondering if you happen to know anyone who is keen on animal fancy, prefers spending time outdoors during the afternoons, and has employment at General Cable? Again, I realize it's quite specific, but I have a feeling we might have mutual friends.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Micah Stevens and Jaxon Prentice\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nJaxon Prentice's background: \nMicah Stevens's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDavid: Hobby: Vacation Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nChristopher: Hobby: Go Company: McKinsey & Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nLee: Hobby: Go Company: Groupon Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPamela: Hobby: Watching television Company: General Cable Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nPhillip: Hobby: Kayaking Company: Sauer-Danfoss Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nKristin: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nRafael: Hobby: Kayaking Company: General Cable Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nChad: Hobby: Foreign language learning Company: General Cable Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPhil: Hobby: Kayaking Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nConnie: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: General Cable Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nTommy: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \n\nJaxon Prentice's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Micah Stevens said: \"Hi there, I'm Micah. I couldn't help but notice your style, very sleek. It's an eye-catcher. You must be around someone who has a good sense of fashion, are you by any chance into hobbies like, let's say, kayaking or 'Go', the board game?\"\n\nTurn #1: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Hello Micah, I'm Jaxon. I do admire a good kayaking experience, it's quite an adventure I must say. And about fashion, well, you could say there's some influence around me. I also spotted that you are an enthusiast of board games. Do you know someone named Rafael by any chance? He loves kayaking as well, works for a big cable company, and enjoys mornings, best time of the day for him to relax.\"\n\nTurn #2: Micah Stevens said: \"Ah, Rafael! Yes, I believe I do know him. He's quite fond of the early hours, isn't he? Speaking of which, do you happen to have a friend who prefers the outdoors in the evening, perhaps even works at H. J. Heinz Company? Just curious, one of my friends who fits this description seems to know a lot of people.\"\n\nTurn #3: Jaxon Prentice said: \"An evening outdoor enthusiast at H. J. Heinz? Sorry, I don't think I know who that could be. However, I do have a friend Robin, who absolutely loves gaming and hanging outdoors but she's more of an evening person. Plus she works at a renowned firearms company. Does that sound familiar to you?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hmm the description doesn't quite match. Perhaps we don't have this mutual friend after all. By the way, do you have any friends that love animal fancy as a hobby and enjoy their afternoons indoors? I know it's quite specific, but I find it so unique and I happen to know someone with these interests.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Micah Stevens and Jaxon Prentice\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nJaxon Prentice's background: \nMicah Stevens's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDavid: Hobby: Vacation Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nChristopher: Hobby: Go Company: McKinsey & Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nLee: Hobby: Go Company: Groupon Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPamela: Hobby: Watching television Company: General Cable Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nPhillip: Hobby: Kayaking Company: Sauer-Danfoss Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nKristin: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nRafael: Hobby: Kayaking Company: General Cable Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nChad: Hobby: Foreign language learning Company: General Cable Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPhil: Hobby: Kayaking Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nConnie: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: General Cable Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nTommy: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \n\nJaxon Prentice's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Micah Stevens said: \"Hi there, I'm Micah. I couldn't help but notice your style, very sleek. It's an eye-catcher. You must be around someone who has a good sense of fashion, are you by any chance into hobbies like, let's say, kayaking or 'Go', the board game?\"\n\nTurn #1: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Hello Micah, I'm Jaxon. I do admire a good kayaking experience, it's quite an adventure I must say. And about fashion, well, you could say there's some influence around me. I also spotted that you are an enthusiast of board games. Do you know someone named Rafael by any chance? He loves kayaking as well, works for a big cable company, and enjoys mornings, best time of the day for him to relax.\"\n\nTurn #2: Micah Stevens said: \"Ah, Rafael! Yes, I believe I do know him. He's quite fond of the early hours, isn't he? Speaking of which, do you happen to have a friend who prefers the outdoors in the evening, perhaps even works at H. J. Heinz Company? Just curious, one of my friends who fits this description seems to know a lot of people.\"\n\nTurn #3: Jaxon Prentice said: \"An evening outdoor enthusiast at H. J. Heinz? Sorry, I don't think I know who that could be. However, I do have a friend Robin, who absolutely loves gaming and hanging outdoors but she's more of an evening person. Plus she works at a renowned firearms company. Does that sound familiar to you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Micah Stevens said: \"Hmm the description doesn't quite match. Perhaps we don't have this mutual friend after all. By the way, do you have any friends that love animal fancy as a hobby and enjoy their afternoons indoors? I know it's quite specific, but I find it so unique and I happen to know someone with these interests.\"\n\nTurn #5: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Animal fancy as a hobby, that's indeed unique! I can't say that it rings a bell though. My friend Robert likes to spend his afternoons indoors, but he is more into foraging, and he works for an international company in the refrigeration sector. I guess the uniqueness of hobbies is what keeps our social circles interesting, right?\"\n\nTurn #6: Micah Stevens said: \"Absolutely, Jaxon. The variety in hobbies indeed keeps our interactions colorful and exciting! Now, this may sound a bit strange, but do you know anyone who is into vacationing and has a knack for cooking sauces, maybe even works for a company that is famous for its ketchup? I only ask because I have a friend who fits this profile and he\u2019s quite the social butterfly.\"\n\nTurn #7: Jaxon Prentice said: \"That's a very specific description indeed, Micah! Unfortunately, I don't seem to know anyone who fits that particular profile. I do, however, have a friend named James who's an enthusiastic vacationer and works for a trendy clothing company. He loves the outdoors, especially in the mornings. Maybe they've crossed paths in their travels?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ah, James, you said? The name does sound familiar, but I'm not too sure. He seems like an interesting fellow, though. Now, speaking of interesting, do you have any friends that are into learning foreign languages and prefer to spend their evenings indoors? I know it's a bit too specific, but I have an acquaintance who has this unique hobby.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Micah Stevens and Jaxon Prentice\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nJaxon Prentice's background: \nMicah Stevens's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDavid: Hobby: Vacation Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nChristopher: Hobby: Go Company: McKinsey & Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nLee: Hobby: Go Company: Groupon Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPamela: Hobby: Watching television Company: General Cable Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nPhillip: Hobby: Kayaking Company: Sauer-Danfoss Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nKristin: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nRafael: Hobby: Kayaking Company: General Cable Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nChad: Hobby: Foreign language learning Company: General Cable Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPhil: Hobby: Kayaking Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nConnie: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: General Cable Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nTommy: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \n\nJaxon Prentice's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Micah Stevens said: \"Hi there, I'm Micah. I couldn't help but notice your style, very sleek. It's an eye-catcher. You must be around someone who has a good sense of fashion, are you by any chance into hobbies like, let's say, kayaking or 'Go', the board game?\"\n\nTurn #1: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Hello Micah, I'm Jaxon. I do admire a good kayaking experience, it's quite an adventure I must say. And about fashion, well, you could say there's some influence around me. I also spotted that you are an enthusiast of board games. Do you know someone named Rafael by any chance? He loves kayaking as well, works for a big cable company, and enjoys mornings, best time of the day for him to relax.\"\n\nTurn #2: Micah Stevens said: \"Ah, Rafael! Yes, I believe I do know him. He's quite fond of the early hours, isn't he? Speaking of which, do you happen to have a friend who prefers the outdoors in the evening, perhaps even works at H. J. Heinz Company? Just curious, one of my friends who fits this description seems to know a lot of people.\"\n\nTurn #3: Jaxon Prentice said: \"An evening outdoor enthusiast at H. J. Heinz? Sorry, I don't think I know who that could be. However, I do have a friend Robin, who absolutely loves gaming and hanging outdoors but she's more of an evening person. Plus she works at a renowned firearms company. Does that sound familiar to you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Micah Stevens said: \"Hmm the description doesn't quite match. Perhaps we don't have this mutual friend after all. By the way, do you have any friends that love animal fancy as a hobby and enjoy their afternoons indoors? I know it's quite specific, but I find it so unique and I happen to know someone with these interests.\"\n\nTurn #5: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Animal fancy as a hobby, that's indeed unique! I can't say that it rings a bell though. My friend Robert likes to spend his afternoons indoors, but he is more into foraging, and he works for an international company in the refrigeration sector. I guess the uniqueness of hobbies is what keeps our social circles interesting, right?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Absolutely, Jaxon. The variety in hobbies indeed keeps our interactions colorful and exciting! Now, this may sound a bit strange, but do you know anyone who is into vacationing and has a knack for cooking sauces, maybe even works for a company that is famous for its ketchup? I only ask because I have a friend who fits this profile and he\u2019s quite the social butterfly.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Micah Stevens and Jaxon Prentice\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nJaxon Prentice's background: \nMicah Stevens's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDavid: Hobby: Vacation Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nChristopher: Hobby: Go Company: McKinsey & Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nLee: Hobby: Go Company: Groupon Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPamela: Hobby: Watching television Company: General Cable Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nPhillip: Hobby: Kayaking Company: Sauer-Danfoss Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nKristin: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nRafael: Hobby: Kayaking Company: General Cable Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nChad: Hobby: Foreign language learning Company: General Cable Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPhil: Hobby: Kayaking Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nConnie: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: General Cable Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nTommy: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \n\nJaxon Prentice's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Micah Stevens said: \"Hi there, I'm Micah. I couldn't help but notice your style, very sleek. It's an eye-catcher. You must be around someone who has a good sense of fashion, are you by any chance into hobbies like, let's say, kayaking or 'Go', the board game?\"\n\nTurn #1: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Hello Micah, I'm Jaxon. I do admire a good kayaking experience, it's quite an adventure I must say. And about fashion, well, you could say there's some influence around me. I also spotted that you are an enthusiast of board games. Do you know someone named Rafael by any chance? He loves kayaking as well, works for a big cable company, and enjoys mornings, best time of the day for him to relax.\"\n\nTurn #2: Micah Stevens said: \"Ah, Rafael! Yes, I believe I do know him. He's quite fond of the early hours, isn't he? Speaking of which, do you happen to have a friend who prefers the outdoors in the evening, perhaps even works at H. J. Heinz Company? Just curious, one of my friends who fits this description seems to know a lot of people.\"\n\nTurn #3: Jaxon Prentice said: \"An evening outdoor enthusiast at H. J. Heinz? Sorry, I don't think I know who that could be. However, I do have a friend Robin, who absolutely loves gaming and hanging outdoors but she's more of an evening person. Plus she works at a renowned firearms company. Does that sound familiar to you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Micah Stevens said: \"Hmm the description doesn't quite match. Perhaps we don't have this mutual friend after all. By the way, do you have any friends that love animal fancy as a hobby and enjoy their afternoons indoors? I know it's quite specific, but I find it so unique and I happen to know someone with these interests.\"\n\nTurn #5: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Animal fancy as a hobby, that's indeed unique! I can't say that it rings a bell though. My friend Robert likes to spend his afternoons indoors, but he is more into foraging, and he works for an international company in the refrigeration sector. I guess the uniqueness of hobbies is what keeps our social circles interesting, right?\"\n\nTurn #6: Micah Stevens said: \"Absolutely, Jaxon. The variety in hobbies indeed keeps our interactions colorful and exciting! Now, this may sound a bit strange, but do you know anyone who is into vacationing and has a knack for cooking sauces, maybe even works for a company that is famous for its ketchup? I only ask because I have a friend who fits this profile and he\u2019s quite the social butterfly.\"\n\nTurn #7: Jaxon Prentice said: \"That's a very specific description indeed, Micah! Unfortunately, I don't seem to know anyone who fits that particular profile. I do, however, have a friend named James who's an enthusiastic vacationer and works for a trendy clothing company. He loves the outdoors, especially in the mornings. Maybe they've crossed paths in their travels?\"\n\nTurn #8: Micah Stevens said: \"Ah, James, you said? The name does sound familiar, but I'm not too sure. He seems like an interesting fellow, though. Now, speaking of interesting, do you have any friends that are into learning foreign languages and prefer to spend their evenings indoors? I know it's a bit too specific, but I have an acquaintance who has this unique hobby.\"\n\nTurn #9: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Enjoying foreign languages, fascinating! I can't say I have friends with that particular interest though. Most of my friends are into outdoor morning activities. It's interesting how unique everyone's hobbies can be!\"\n\nTurn #10: Micah Stevens said: \"Indeed, it's the diversity that makes life enjoyable, Jaxon. By the way, do you happen to know someone who's employed by General Cable, prefers to stay indoors in the afternoon, and enjoys watching television? Just asking out of curiosity.\"\n\nTurn #11: Jaxon Prentice said: \"General Cable and an afternoon television enthusiast? That's definitely ringing a bell. Might be thinking of my friend Rafael, though he's more of a kayaking enthusiast than a television watcher. Small world, isn't it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oh, Rafael seems like a pretty versatile guy! Talking of the indoors, do you know someone who likes to play 'Go', the board game, in the evenings and works for an international management consulting firm? Just a thought, no harm in asking.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Micah Stevens and Jaxon Prentice\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nJaxon Prentice's background: \nMicah Stevens's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDavid: Hobby: Vacation Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nChristopher: Hobby: Go Company: McKinsey & Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nLee: Hobby: Go Company: Groupon Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPamela: Hobby: Watching television Company: General Cable Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nPhillip: Hobby: Kayaking Company: Sauer-Danfoss Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nKristin: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nRafael: Hobby: Kayaking Company: General Cable Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nChad: Hobby: Foreign language learning Company: General Cable Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPhil: Hobby: Kayaking Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nConnie: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: General Cable Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nTommy: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \n\nJaxon Prentice's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Micah Stevens said: \"Hi there, I'm Micah. I couldn't help but notice your style, very sleek. It's an eye-catcher. You must be around someone who has a good sense of fashion, are you by any chance into hobbies like, let's say, kayaking or 'Go', the board game?\"\n\nTurn #1: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Hello Micah, I'm Jaxon. I do admire a good kayaking experience, it's quite an adventure I must say. And about fashion, well, you could say there's some influence around me. I also spotted that you are an enthusiast of board games. Do you know someone named Rafael by any chance? He loves kayaking as well, works for a big cable company, and enjoys mornings, best time of the day for him to relax.\"\n\nTurn #2: Micah Stevens said: \"Ah, Rafael! Yes, I believe I do know him. He's quite fond of the early hours, isn't he? Speaking of which, do you happen to have a friend who prefers the outdoors in the evening, perhaps even works at H. J. Heinz Company? Just curious, one of my friends who fits this description seems to know a lot of people.\"\n\nTurn #3: Jaxon Prentice said: \"An evening outdoor enthusiast at H. J. Heinz? Sorry, I don't think I know who that could be. However, I do have a friend Robin, who absolutely loves gaming and hanging outdoors but she's more of an evening person. Plus she works at a renowned firearms company. Does that sound familiar to you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Micah Stevens said: \"Hmm the description doesn't quite match. Perhaps we don't have this mutual friend after all. By the way, do you have any friends that love animal fancy as a hobby and enjoy their afternoons indoors? I know it's quite specific, but I find it so unique and I happen to know someone with these interests.\"\n\nTurn #5: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Animal fancy as a hobby, that's indeed unique! I can't say that it rings a bell though. My friend Robert likes to spend his afternoons indoors, but he is more into foraging, and he works for an international company in the refrigeration sector. I guess the uniqueness of hobbies is what keeps our social circles interesting, right?\"\n\nTurn #6: Micah Stevens said: \"Absolutely, Jaxon. The variety in hobbies indeed keeps our interactions colorful and exciting! Now, this may sound a bit strange, but do you know anyone who is into vacationing and has a knack for cooking sauces, maybe even works for a company that is famous for its ketchup? I only ask because I have a friend who fits this profile and he\u2019s quite the social butterfly.\"\n\nTurn #7: Jaxon Prentice said: \"That's a very specific description indeed, Micah! Unfortunately, I don't seem to know anyone who fits that particular profile. I do, however, have a friend named James who's an enthusiastic vacationer and works for a trendy clothing company. He loves the outdoors, especially in the mornings. Maybe they've crossed paths in their travels?\"\n\nTurn #8: Micah Stevens said: \"Ah, James, you said? The name does sound familiar, but I'm not too sure. He seems like an interesting fellow, though. Now, speaking of interesting, do you have any friends that are into learning foreign languages and prefer to spend their evenings indoors? I know it's a bit too specific, but I have an acquaintance who has this unique hobby.\"\n\nTurn #9: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Enjoying foreign languages, fascinating! I can't say I have friends with that particular interest though. Most of my friends are into outdoor morning activities. It's interesting how unique everyone's hobbies can be!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, it's the diversity that makes life enjoyable, Jaxon. By the way, do you happen to know someone who's employed by General Cable, prefers to stay indoors in the afternoon, and enjoys watching television? Just asking out of curiosity.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Micah Stevens and Jaxon Prentice\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nJaxon Prentice's background: \nMicah Stevens's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDavid: Hobby: Vacation Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nChristopher: Hobby: Go Company: McKinsey & Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nLee: Hobby: Go Company: Groupon Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPamela: Hobby: Watching television Company: General Cable Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nPhillip: Hobby: Kayaking Company: Sauer-Danfoss Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nKristin: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nRafael: Hobby: Kayaking Company: General Cable Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nChad: Hobby: Foreign language learning Company: General Cable Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPhil: Hobby: Kayaking Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nConnie: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: General Cable Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nTommy: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \n\nJaxon Prentice's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Micah Stevens said: \"Hi there, I'm Micah. I couldn't help but notice your style, very sleek. It's an eye-catcher. You must be around someone who has a good sense of fashion, are you by any chance into hobbies like, let's say, kayaking or 'Go', the board game?\"\n\nTurn #1: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Hello Micah, I'm Jaxon. I do admire a good kayaking experience, it's quite an adventure I must say. And about fashion, well, you could say there's some influence around me. I also spotted that you are an enthusiast of board games. Do you know someone named Rafael by any chance? He loves kayaking as well, works for a big cable company, and enjoys mornings, best time of the day for him to relax.\"\n\nTurn #2: Micah Stevens said: \"Ah, Rafael! Yes, I believe I do know him. He's quite fond of the early hours, isn't he? Speaking of which, do you happen to have a friend who prefers the outdoors in the evening, perhaps even works at H. J. Heinz Company? Just curious, one of my friends who fits this description seems to know a lot of people.\"\n\nTurn #3: Jaxon Prentice said: \"An evening outdoor enthusiast at H. J. Heinz? Sorry, I don't think I know who that could be. However, I do have a friend Robin, who absolutely loves gaming and hanging outdoors but she's more of an evening person. Plus she works at a renowned firearms company. Does that sound familiar to you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Micah Stevens said: \"Hmm the description doesn't quite match. Perhaps we don't have this mutual friend after all. By the way, do you have any friends that love animal fancy as a hobby and enjoy their afternoons indoors? I know it's quite specific, but I find it so unique and I happen to know someone with these interests.\"\n\nTurn #5: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Animal fancy as a hobby, that's indeed unique! I can't say that it rings a bell though. My friend Robert likes to spend his afternoons indoors, but he is more into foraging, and he works for an international company in the refrigeration sector. I guess the uniqueness of hobbies is what keeps our social circles interesting, right?\"\n\nTurn #6: Micah Stevens said: \"Absolutely, Jaxon. The variety in hobbies indeed keeps our interactions colorful and exciting! Now, this may sound a bit strange, but do you know anyone who is into vacationing and has a knack for cooking sauces, maybe even works for a company that is famous for its ketchup? I only ask because I have a friend who fits this profile and he\u2019s quite the social butterfly.\"\n\nTurn #7: Jaxon Prentice said: \"That's a very specific description indeed, Micah! Unfortunately, I don't seem to know anyone who fits that particular profile. I do, however, have a friend named James who's an enthusiastic vacationer and works for a trendy clothing company. He loves the outdoors, especially in the mornings. Maybe they've crossed paths in their travels?\"\n\nTurn #8: Micah Stevens said: \"Ah, James, you said? The name does sound familiar, but I'm not too sure. He seems like an interesting fellow, though. Now, speaking of interesting, do you have any friends that are into learning foreign languages and prefer to spend their evenings indoors? I know it's a bit too specific, but I have an acquaintance who has this unique hobby.\"\n\nTurn #9: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Enjoying foreign languages, fascinating! I can't say I have friends with that particular interest though. Most of my friends are into outdoor morning activities. It's interesting how unique everyone's hobbies can be!\"\n\nTurn #10: Micah Stevens said: \"Indeed, it's the diversity that makes life enjoyable, Jaxon. By the way, do you happen to know someone who's employed by General Cable, prefers to stay indoors in the afternoon, and enjoys watching television? Just asking out of curiosity.\"\n\nTurn #11: Jaxon Prentice said: \"General Cable and an afternoon television enthusiast? That's definitely ringing a bell. Might be thinking of my friend Rafael, though he's more of a kayaking enthusiast than a television watcher. Small world, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #12: Micah Stevens said: \"Oh, Rafael seems like a pretty versatile guy! Talking of the indoors, do you know someone who likes to play 'Go', the board game, in the evenings and works for an international management consulting firm? Just a thought, no harm in asking.\"\n\nTurn #13: Jaxon Prentice said: \"'Go' the board game, and working for an international management consulting firm? I'm afraid that doesn't ring a bell. I do have friends who like board games, but none who fits this exact description. It's fascinating to see how varied the interests of people can be, isn't it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're absolutely right, Jaxon. It's the different hobbies and interests that make social connections so enriching. By the way, do you happen to know anyone who loves animal fancy, spends their afternoons indoors, and works in a company known for its ketchup?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Micah Stevens and Jaxon Prentice\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nJaxon Prentice's background: \nMicah Stevens's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDavid: Hobby: Vacation Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nChristopher: Hobby: Go Company: McKinsey & Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nLee: Hobby: Go Company: Groupon Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPamela: Hobby: Watching television Company: General Cable Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nPhillip: Hobby: Kayaking Company: Sauer-Danfoss Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nKristin: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nRafael: Hobby: Kayaking Company: General Cable Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nChad: Hobby: Foreign language learning Company: General Cable Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPhil: Hobby: Kayaking Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nConnie: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: General Cable Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nTommy: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \n\nJaxon Prentice's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Micah Stevens said: \"Hi there, I'm Micah. I couldn't help but notice your style, very sleek. It's an eye-catcher. You must be around someone who has a good sense of fashion, are you by any chance into hobbies like, let's say, kayaking or 'Go', the board game?\"\n\nTurn #1: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Hello Micah, I'm Jaxon. I do admire a good kayaking experience, it's quite an adventure I must say. And about fashion, well, you could say there's some influence around me. I also spotted that you are an enthusiast of board games. Do you know someone named Rafael by any chance? He loves kayaking as well, works for a big cable company, and enjoys mornings, best time of the day for him to relax.\"\n\nTurn #2: Micah Stevens said: \"Ah, Rafael! Yes, I believe I do know him. He's quite fond of the early hours, isn't he? Speaking of which, do you happen to have a friend who prefers the outdoors in the evening, perhaps even works at H. J. Heinz Company? Just curious, one of my friends who fits this description seems to know a lot of people.\"\n\nTurn #3: Jaxon Prentice said: \"An evening outdoor enthusiast at H. J. Heinz? Sorry, I don't think I know who that could be. However, I do have a friend Robin, who absolutely loves gaming and hanging outdoors but she's more of an evening person. Plus she works at a renowned firearms company. Does that sound familiar to you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Micah Stevens said: \"Hmm the description doesn't quite match. Perhaps we don't have this mutual friend after all. By the way, do you have any friends that love animal fancy as a hobby and enjoy their afternoons indoors? I know it's quite specific, but I find it so unique and I happen to know someone with these interests.\"\n\nTurn #5: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Animal fancy as a hobby, that's indeed unique! I can't say that it rings a bell though. My friend Robert likes to spend his afternoons indoors, but he is more into foraging, and he works for an international company in the refrigeration sector. I guess the uniqueness of hobbies is what keeps our social circles interesting, right?\"\n\nTurn #6: Micah Stevens said: \"Absolutely, Jaxon. The variety in hobbies indeed keeps our interactions colorful and exciting! Now, this may sound a bit strange, but do you know anyone who is into vacationing and has a knack for cooking sauces, maybe even works for a company that is famous for its ketchup? I only ask because I have a friend who fits this profile and he\u2019s quite the social butterfly.\"\n\nTurn #7: Jaxon Prentice said: \"That's a very specific description indeed, Micah! Unfortunately, I don't seem to know anyone who fits that particular profile. I do, however, have a friend named James who's an enthusiastic vacationer and works for a trendy clothing company. He loves the outdoors, especially in the mornings. Maybe they've crossed paths in their travels?\"\n\nTurn #8: Micah Stevens said: \"Ah, James, you said? The name does sound familiar, but I'm not too sure. He seems like an interesting fellow, though. Now, speaking of interesting, do you have any friends that are into learning foreign languages and prefer to spend their evenings indoors? I know it's a bit too specific, but I have an acquaintance who has this unique hobby.\"\n\nTurn #9: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Enjoying foreign languages, fascinating! I can't say I have friends with that particular interest though. Most of my friends are into outdoor morning activities. It's interesting how unique everyone's hobbies can be!\"\n\nTurn #10: Micah Stevens said: \"Indeed, it's the diversity that makes life enjoyable, Jaxon. By the way, do you happen to know someone who's employed by General Cable, prefers to stay indoors in the afternoon, and enjoys watching television? Just asking out of curiosity.\"\n\nTurn #11: Jaxon Prentice said: \"General Cable and an afternoon television enthusiast? That's definitely ringing a bell. Might be thinking of my friend Rafael, though he's more of a kayaking enthusiast than a television watcher. Small world, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #12: Micah Stevens said: \"Oh, Rafael seems like a pretty versatile guy! Talking of the indoors, do you know someone who likes to play 'Go', the board game, in the evenings and works for an international management consulting firm? Just a thought, no harm in asking.\"\n\nTurn #13: Jaxon Prentice said: \"'Go' the board game, and working for an international management consulting firm? I'm afraid that doesn't ring a bell. I do have friends who like board games, but none who fits this exact description. It's fascinating to see how varied the interests of people can be, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #14: Micah Stevens said: \"You're absolutely right, Jaxon. It's the different hobbies and interests that make social connections so enriching. By the way, do you happen to know anyone who loves animal fancy, spends their afternoons indoors, and works in a company known for its ketchup?\"\n\nTurn #15: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Animal fancy, indoor afternoons, and a company known for its ketchup? You have quite a unique set of friends, Micah, but as it happens, none of mine match that description. It's certainly an intriguing combination of interests and occupation, though.\"\n\nTurn #16: Micah Stevens said: \"It sure is! This chat has been quite an enjoyable diversion. By any chance, do you have a friend who gets their kicks from kayaking and works somewhere famous for their hydraulics, maybe an outdoor person who enjoys the afternoon?\"\n\nTurn #17: Jaxon Prentice said: \"An afternoon kayak enthusiast who works with hydraulics, that does sound like Wanda! She's an executive at a company known for its hydraulic machinery. Her perfect day starts with some intense weightlifting, and she takes advantage of the beautiful weather in the afternoons for her passion - kayaking. Now, isn't that something?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #18. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Fascinating, Jaxon! Wanda seems like quite an interesting character. With people having such varied interests and hobbies, it really does make our social circles exciting! Still on the topic of friends, do you have any who love to play 'Go', the board game, and work for McKinsey & Company? I know it's a bit particular, but just trying to piece together a possible connection.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Jaxon Prentice, your task is to act/speak as Jaxon Prentice would, keeping in mind Jaxon Prentice's social goal.\nYou can find Jaxon Prentice's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Jaxon Prentice's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Jaxon Prentice's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Micah Stevens and Jaxon Prentice\nMicah Stevens's background: \nJaxon Prentice's background: Jaxon Prentice is a 40-year-old male investigative journalist. He/him pronouns. Jaxon Prentice, an investigative journalist, is known for his brisk jogging sessions early in the morning and his active participation in community functions. Personality and values description: Jaxon Prentice, outgoing yet erratic, emphasizes achievement, power, and security. His decisions swing between quick adaptations to situations and careful planning. Jaxon's secrets: Fabricated evidence to incriminate a corrupt politician\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nJaxon Prentice's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nTina: Hobby: Lacemaking Company: Groupon Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRafael: Hobby: Kayaking Company: General Cable Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nWanda: Hobby: Weightlifting Company: Sauer-Danfoss Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRaymond: Hobby: Foraging Company: Chicago Bridge & Iron Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRicky: Hobby: Foraging Company: L. W. Seecamp Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRobert: Hobby: Foraging Company: Lennox International Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nFrances: Hobby: Foraging Company: Expedia Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nScott: Hobby: Gaming Company: Expedia Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nHelen: Hobby: Motor sports Company: Union Bank Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRobin: Hobby: Gaming Company: L. W. Seecamp Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nJames: Hobby: Vacation Company: Urban Outfitters Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Micah Stevens said: \"Hi there, I'm Micah. I couldn't help but notice your style, very sleek. It's an eye-catcher. You must be around someone who has a good sense of fashion, are you by any chance into hobbies like, let's say, kayaking or 'Go', the board game?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hello Micah, I'm Jaxon. I do admire a good kayaking experience, it's quite an adventure I must say. And about fashion, well, you could say there's some influence around me. I also spotted that you are an enthusiast of board games. Do you know someone named Rafael by any chance? He loves kayaking as well, works for a big cable company, and enjoys mornings, best time of the day for him to relax.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Jaxon Prentice, your task is to act/speak as Jaxon Prentice would, keeping in mind Jaxon Prentice's social goal.\nYou can find Jaxon Prentice's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Jaxon Prentice's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Jaxon Prentice's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Micah Stevens and Jaxon Prentice\nMicah Stevens's background: \nJaxon Prentice's background: Jaxon Prentice is a 40-year-old male investigative journalist. He/him pronouns. Jaxon Prentice, an investigative journalist, is known for his brisk jogging sessions early in the morning and his active participation in community functions. Personality and values description: Jaxon Prentice, outgoing yet erratic, emphasizes achievement, power, and security. His decisions swing between quick adaptations to situations and careful planning. Jaxon's secrets: Fabricated evidence to incriminate a corrupt politician\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nJaxon Prentice's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nTina: Hobby: Lacemaking Company: Groupon Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRafael: Hobby: Kayaking Company: General Cable Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nWanda: Hobby: Weightlifting Company: Sauer-Danfoss Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRaymond: Hobby: Foraging Company: Chicago Bridge & Iron Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRicky: Hobby: Foraging Company: L. W. Seecamp Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRobert: Hobby: Foraging Company: Lennox International Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nFrances: Hobby: Foraging Company: Expedia Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nScott: Hobby: Gaming Company: Expedia Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nHelen: Hobby: Motor sports Company: Union Bank Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRobin: Hobby: Gaming Company: L. W. Seecamp Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nJames: Hobby: Vacation Company: Urban Outfitters Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Micah Stevens said: \"Hi there, I'm Micah. I couldn't help but notice your style, very sleek. It's an eye-catcher. You must be around someone who has a good sense of fashion, are you by any chance into hobbies like, let's say, kayaking or 'Go', the board game?\"\n\nTurn #1: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Hello Micah, I'm Jaxon. I do admire a good kayaking experience, it's quite an adventure I must say. And about fashion, well, you could say there's some influence around me. I also spotted that you are an enthusiast of board games. Do you know someone named Rafael by any chance? He loves kayaking as well, works for a big cable company, and enjoys mornings, best time of the day for him to relax.\"\n\nTurn #2: Micah Stevens said: \"Ah, Rafael! Yes, I believe I do know him. He's quite fond of the early hours, isn't he? Speaking of which, do you happen to have a friend who prefers the outdoors in the evening, perhaps even works at H. J. Heinz Company? Just curious, one of my friends who fits this description seems to know a lot of people.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"An evening outdoor enthusiast at H. J. Heinz? Sorry, I don't think I know who that could be. However, I do have a friend Robin, who absolutely loves gaming and hanging outdoors but she's more of an evening person. Plus she works at a renowned firearms company. Does that sound familiar to you?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Micah Stevens and Jaxon Prentice\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nJaxon Prentice's background: \nMicah Stevens's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDavid: Hobby: Vacation Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nChristopher: Hobby: Go Company: McKinsey & Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nLee: Hobby: Go Company: Groupon Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPamela: Hobby: Watching television Company: General Cable Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nPhillip: Hobby: Kayaking Company: Sauer-Danfoss Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nKristin: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nRafael: Hobby: Kayaking Company: General Cable Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nChad: Hobby: Foreign language learning Company: General Cable Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPhil: Hobby: Kayaking Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nConnie: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: General Cable Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nTommy: Hobby: Animal fancy Company: H. J. Heinz Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \n\nJaxon Prentice's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Micah Stevens said: \"Hi there, I'm Micah. I couldn't help but notice your style, very sleek. It's an eye-catcher. You must be around someone who has a good sense of fashion, are you by any chance into hobbies like, let's say, kayaking or 'Go', the board game?\"\n\nTurn #1: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Hello Micah, I'm Jaxon. I do admire a good kayaking experience, it's quite an adventure I must say. And about fashion, well, you could say there's some influence around me. I also spotted that you are an enthusiast of board games. Do you know someone named Rafael by any chance? He loves kayaking as well, works for a big cable company, and enjoys mornings, best time of the day for him to relax.\"\n\nTurn #2: Micah Stevens said: \"Ah, Rafael! Yes, I believe I do know him. He's quite fond of the early hours, isn't he? Speaking of which, do you happen to have a friend who prefers the outdoors in the evening, perhaps even works at H. J. Heinz Company? Just curious, one of my friends who fits this description seems to know a lot of people.\"\n\nTurn #3: Jaxon Prentice said: \"An evening outdoor enthusiast at H. J. Heinz? Sorry, I don't think I know who that could be. However, I do have a friend Robin, who absolutely loves gaming and hanging outdoors but she's more of an evening person. Plus she works at a renowned firearms company. Does that sound familiar to you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Micah Stevens said: \"Hmm the description doesn't quite match. Perhaps we don't have this mutual friend after all. By the way, do you have any friends that love animal fancy as a hobby and enjoy their afternoons indoors? I know it's quite specific, but I find it so unique and I happen to know someone with these interests.\"\n\nTurn #5: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Animal fancy as a hobby, that's indeed unique! I can't say that it rings a bell though. My friend Robert likes to spend his afternoons indoors, but he is more into foraging, and he works for an international company in the refrigeration sector. I guess the uniqueness of hobbies is what keeps our social circles interesting, right?\"\n\nTurn #6: Micah Stevens said: \"Absolutely, Jaxon. The variety in hobbies indeed keeps our interactions colorful and exciting! Now, this may sound a bit strange, but do you know anyone who is into vacationing and has a knack for cooking sauces, maybe even works for a company that is famous for its ketchup? I only ask because I have a friend who fits this profile and he\u2019s quite the social butterfly.\"\n\nTurn #7: Jaxon Prentice said: \"That's a very specific description indeed, Micah! Unfortunately, I don't seem to know anyone who fits that particular profile. I do, however, have a friend named James who's an enthusiastic vacationer and works for a trendy clothing company. He loves the outdoors, especially in the mornings. Maybe they've crossed paths in their travels?\"\n\nTurn #8: Micah Stevens said: \"Ah, James, you said? The name does sound familiar, but I'm not too sure. He seems like an interesting fellow, though. Now, speaking of interesting, do you have any friends that are into learning foreign languages and prefer to spend their evenings indoors? I know it's a bit too specific, but I have an acquaintance who has this unique hobby.\"\n\nTurn #9: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Enjoying foreign languages, fascinating! I can't say I have friends with that particular interest though. Most of my friends are into outdoor morning activities. It's interesting how unique everyone's hobbies can be!\"\n\nTurn #10: Micah Stevens said: \"Indeed, it's the diversity that makes life enjoyable, Jaxon. By the way, do you happen to know someone who's employed by General Cable, prefers to stay indoors in the afternoon, and enjoys watching television? Just asking out of curiosity.\"\n\nTurn #11: Jaxon Prentice said: \"General Cable and an afternoon television enthusiast? That's definitely ringing a bell. Might be thinking of my friend Rafael, though he's more of a kayaking enthusiast than a television watcher. Small world, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #12: Micah Stevens said: \"Oh, Rafael seems like a pretty versatile guy! Talking of the indoors, do you know someone who likes to play 'Go', the board game, in the evenings and works for an international management consulting firm? Just a thought, no harm in asking.\"\n\nTurn #13: Jaxon Prentice said: \"'Go' the board game, and working for an international management consulting firm? I'm afraid that doesn't ring a bell. I do have friends who like board games, but none who fits this exact description. It's fascinating to see how varied the interests of people can be, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #14: Micah Stevens said: \"You're absolutely right, Jaxon. It's the different hobbies and interests that make social connections so enriching. By the way, do you happen to know anyone who loves animal fancy, spends their afternoons indoors, and works in a company known for its ketchup?\"\n\nTurn #15: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Animal fancy, indoor afternoons, and a company known for its ketchup? You have quite a unique set of friends, Micah, but as it happens, none of mine match that description. It's certainly an intriguing combination of interests and occupation, though.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'It sure is! This chat has been quite an enjoyable diversion. By any chance, do you have a friend who gets their kicks from kayaking and works somewhere famous for their hydraulics, maybe an outdoor person who enjoys the afternoon?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Jaxon Prentice, your task is to act/speak as Jaxon Prentice would, keeping in mind Jaxon Prentice's social goal.\nYou can find Jaxon Prentice's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Jaxon Prentice's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Jaxon Prentice's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Micah Stevens and Jaxon Prentice\nMicah Stevens's background: \nJaxon Prentice's background: Jaxon Prentice is a 40-year-old male investigative journalist. He/him pronouns. Jaxon Prentice, an investigative journalist, is known for his brisk jogging sessions early in the morning and his active participation in community functions. Personality and values description: Jaxon Prentice, outgoing yet erratic, emphasizes achievement, power, and security. His decisions swing between quick adaptations to situations and careful planning. Jaxon's secrets: Fabricated evidence to incriminate a corrupt politician\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nJaxon Prentice's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nTina: Hobby: Lacemaking Company: Groupon Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRafael: Hobby: Kayaking Company: General Cable Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nWanda: Hobby: Weightlifting Company: Sauer-Danfoss Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRaymond: Hobby: Foraging Company: Chicago Bridge & Iron Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRicky: Hobby: Foraging Company: L. W. Seecamp Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRobert: Hobby: Foraging Company: Lennox International Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nFrances: Hobby: Foraging Company: Expedia Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nScott: Hobby: Gaming Company: Expedia Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nHelen: Hobby: Motor sports Company: Union Bank Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRobin: Hobby: Gaming Company: L. W. Seecamp Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nJames: Hobby: Vacation Company: Urban Outfitters Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Micah Stevens said: \"Hi there, I'm Micah. I couldn't help but notice your style, very sleek. It's an eye-catcher. You must be around someone who has a good sense of fashion, are you by any chance into hobbies like, let's say, kayaking or 'Go', the board game?\"\n\nTurn #1: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Hello Micah, I'm Jaxon. I do admire a good kayaking experience, it's quite an adventure I must say. And about fashion, well, you could say there's some influence around me. I also spotted that you are an enthusiast of board games. Do you know someone named Rafael by any chance? He loves kayaking as well, works for a big cable company, and enjoys mornings, best time of the day for him to relax.\"\n\nTurn #2: Micah Stevens said: \"Ah, Rafael! Yes, I believe I do know him. He's quite fond of the early hours, isn't he? Speaking of which, do you happen to have a friend who prefers the outdoors in the evening, perhaps even works at H. J. Heinz Company? Just curious, one of my friends who fits this description seems to know a lot of people.\"\n\nTurn #3: Jaxon Prentice said: \"An evening outdoor enthusiast at H. J. Heinz? Sorry, I don't think I know who that could be. However, I do have a friend Robin, who absolutely loves gaming and hanging outdoors but she's more of an evening person. Plus she works at a renowned firearms company. Does that sound familiar to you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Micah Stevens said: \"Hmm the description doesn't quite match. Perhaps we don't have this mutual friend after all. By the way, do you have any friends that love animal fancy as a hobby and enjoy their afternoons indoors? I know it's quite specific, but I find it so unique and I happen to know someone with these interests.\"\n\nTurn #5: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Animal fancy as a hobby, that's indeed unique! I can't say that it rings a bell though. My friend Robert likes to spend his afternoons indoors, but he is more into foraging, and he works for an international company in the refrigeration sector. I guess the uniqueness of hobbies is what keeps our social circles interesting, right?\"\n\nTurn #6: Micah Stevens said: \"Absolutely, Jaxon. The variety in hobbies indeed keeps our interactions colorful and exciting! Now, this may sound a bit strange, but do you know anyone who is into vacationing and has a knack for cooking sauces, maybe even works for a company that is famous for its ketchup? I only ask because I have a friend who fits this profile and he\u2019s quite the social butterfly.\"\n\nTurn #7: Jaxon Prentice said: \"That's a very specific description indeed, Micah! Unfortunately, I don't seem to know anyone who fits that particular profile. I do, however, have a friend named James who's an enthusiastic vacationer and works for a trendy clothing company. He loves the outdoors, especially in the mornings. Maybe they've crossed paths in their travels?\"\n\nTurn #8: Micah Stevens said: \"Ah, James, you said? The name does sound familiar, but I'm not too sure. He seems like an interesting fellow, though. Now, speaking of interesting, do you have any friends that are into learning foreign languages and prefer to spend their evenings indoors? I know it's a bit too specific, but I have an acquaintance who has this unique hobby.\"\n\nTurn #9: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Enjoying foreign languages, fascinating! I can't say I have friends with that particular interest though. Most of my friends are into outdoor morning activities. It's interesting how unique everyone's hobbies can be!\"\n\nTurn #10: Micah Stevens said: \"Indeed, it's the diversity that makes life enjoyable, Jaxon. By the way, do you happen to know someone who's employed by General Cable, prefers to stay indoors in the afternoon, and enjoys watching television? Just asking out of curiosity.\"\n\nTurn #11: Jaxon Prentice said: \"General Cable and an afternoon television enthusiast? That's definitely ringing a bell. Might be thinking of my friend Rafael, though he's more of a kayaking enthusiast than a television watcher. Small world, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #12: Micah Stevens said: \"Oh, Rafael seems like a pretty versatile guy! Talking of the indoors, do you know someone who likes to play 'Go', the board game, in the evenings and works for an international management consulting firm? Just a thought, no harm in asking.\"\n\nTurn #13: Jaxon Prentice said: \"'Go' the board game, and working for an international management consulting firm? I'm afraid that doesn't ring a bell. I do have friends who like board games, but none who fits this exact description. It's fascinating to see how varied the interests of people can be, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #14: Micah Stevens said: \"You're absolutely right, Jaxon. It's the different hobbies and interests that make social connections so enriching. By the way, do you happen to know anyone who loves animal fancy, spends their afternoons indoors, and works in a company known for its ketchup?\"\n\nTurn #15: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Animal fancy, indoor afternoons, and a company known for its ketchup? You have quite a unique set of friends, Micah, but as it happens, none of mine match that description. It's certainly an intriguing combination of interests and occupation, though.\"\n\nTurn #16: Micah Stevens said: \"It sure is! This chat has been quite an enjoyable diversion. By any chance, do you have a friend who gets their kicks from kayaking and works somewhere famous for their hydraulics, maybe an outdoor person who enjoys the afternoon?\"\n\nTurn #17: Jaxon Prentice said: \"An afternoon kayak enthusiast who works with hydraulics, that does sound like Wanda! She's an executive at a company known for its hydraulic machinery. Her perfect day starts with some intense weightlifting, and she takes advantage of the beautiful weather in the afternoons for her passion - kayaking. Now, isn't that something?\"\n\nTurn #18: Micah Stevens said: \"Fascinating, Jaxon! Wanda seems like quite an interesting character. With people having such varied interests and hobbies, it really does make our social circles exciting! Still on the topic of friends, do you have any who love to play 'Go', the board game, and work for McKinsey & Company? I know it's a bit particular, but just trying to piece together a possible connection.\"\n\nTurn #19: Jaxon Prentice said: \"'Go', the board game, and McKinsey & Company, that's rather specific, Micah. Unfortunately, none of my friends fits that description. It does show how unique and intriguing everyone's interests can be though. Diversity truly makes our social tapestry more vibrant, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #20: Micah Stevens said: \"Absolutely, diversity is the key. Well, I was wondering if you happen to know anyone who is keen on animal fancy, prefers spending time outdoors during the afternoons, and has employment at General Cable? Again, I realize it's quite specific, but I have a feeling we might have mutual friends.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #21. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Jaxon Prentice, your task is to act/speak as Jaxon Prentice would, keeping in mind Jaxon Prentice's social goal.\nYou can find Jaxon Prentice's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Jaxon Prentice's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Jaxon Prentice's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Micah Stevens and Jaxon Prentice\nMicah Stevens's background: \nJaxon Prentice's background: Jaxon Prentice is a 40-year-old male investigative journalist. He/him pronouns. Jaxon Prentice, an investigative journalist, is known for his brisk jogging sessions early in the morning and his active participation in community functions. Personality and values description: Jaxon Prentice, outgoing yet erratic, emphasizes achievement, power, and security. His decisions swing between quick adaptations to situations and careful planning. Jaxon's secrets: Fabricated evidence to incriminate a corrupt politician\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nJaxon Prentice's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nTina: Hobby: Lacemaking Company: Groupon Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRafael: Hobby: Kayaking Company: General Cable Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nWanda: Hobby: Weightlifting Company: Sauer-Danfoss Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRaymond: Hobby: Foraging Company: Chicago Bridge & Iron Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRicky: Hobby: Foraging Company: L. W. Seecamp Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRobert: Hobby: Foraging Company: Lennox International Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nFrances: Hobby: Foraging Company: Expedia Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nScott: Hobby: Gaming Company: Expedia Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nHelen: Hobby: Motor sports Company: Union Bank Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRobin: Hobby: Gaming Company: L. W. Seecamp Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nJames: Hobby: Vacation Company: Urban Outfitters Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Micah Stevens said: \"Hi there, I'm Micah. I couldn't help but notice your style, very sleek. It's an eye-catcher. You must be around someone who has a good sense of fashion, are you by any chance into hobbies like, let's say, kayaking or 'Go', the board game?\"\n\nTurn #1: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Hello Micah, I'm Jaxon. I do admire a good kayaking experience, it's quite an adventure I must say. And about fashion, well, you could say there's some influence around me. I also spotted that you are an enthusiast of board games. Do you know someone named Rafael by any chance? He loves kayaking as well, works for a big cable company, and enjoys mornings, best time of the day for him to relax.\"\n\nTurn #2: Micah Stevens said: \"Ah, Rafael! Yes, I believe I do know him. He's quite fond of the early hours, isn't he? Speaking of which, do you happen to have a friend who prefers the outdoors in the evening, perhaps even works at H. J. Heinz Company? Just curious, one of my friends who fits this description seems to know a lot of people.\"\n\nTurn #3: Jaxon Prentice said: \"An evening outdoor enthusiast at H. J. Heinz? Sorry, I don't think I know who that could be. However, I do have a friend Robin, who absolutely loves gaming and hanging outdoors but she's more of an evening person. Plus she works at a renowned firearms company. Does that sound familiar to you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Micah Stevens said: \"Hmm the description doesn't quite match. Perhaps we don't have this mutual friend after all. By the way, do you have any friends that love animal fancy as a hobby and enjoy their afternoons indoors? I know it's quite specific, but I find it so unique and I happen to know someone with these interests.\"\n\nTurn #5: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Animal fancy as a hobby, that's indeed unique! I can't say that it rings a bell though. My friend Robert likes to spend his afternoons indoors, but he is more into foraging, and he works for an international company in the refrigeration sector. I guess the uniqueness of hobbies is what keeps our social circles interesting, right?\"\n\nTurn #6: Micah Stevens said: \"Absolutely, Jaxon. The variety in hobbies indeed keeps our interactions colorful and exciting! Now, this may sound a bit strange, but do you know anyone who is into vacationing and has a knack for cooking sauces, maybe even works for a company that is famous for its ketchup? I only ask because I have a friend who fits this profile and he\u2019s quite the social butterfly.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's a very specific description indeed, Micah! Unfortunately, I don't seem to know anyone who fits that particular profile. I do, however, have a friend named James who's an enthusiastic vacationer and works for a trendy clothing company. He loves the outdoors, especially in the mornings. Maybe they've crossed paths in their travels?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Jaxon Prentice, your task is to act/speak as Jaxon Prentice would, keeping in mind Jaxon Prentice's social goal.\nYou can find Jaxon Prentice's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Jaxon Prentice's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Jaxon Prentice's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Micah Stevens and Jaxon Prentice\nMicah Stevens's background: \nJaxon Prentice's background: Jaxon Prentice is a 40-year-old male investigative journalist. He/him pronouns. Jaxon Prentice, an investigative journalist, is known for his brisk jogging sessions early in the morning and his active participation in community functions. Personality and values description: Jaxon Prentice, outgoing yet erratic, emphasizes achievement, power, and security. His decisions swing between quick adaptations to situations and careful planning. Jaxon's secrets: Fabricated evidence to incriminate a corrupt politician\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nJaxon Prentice's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nTina: Hobby: Lacemaking Company: Groupon Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRafael: Hobby: Kayaking Company: General Cable Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nWanda: Hobby: Weightlifting Company: Sauer-Danfoss Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRaymond: Hobby: Foraging Company: Chicago Bridge & Iron Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRicky: Hobby: Foraging Company: L. W. Seecamp Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRobert: Hobby: Foraging Company: Lennox International Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nFrances: Hobby: Foraging Company: Expedia Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nScott: Hobby: Gaming Company: Expedia Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nHelen: Hobby: Motor sports Company: Union Bank Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRobin: Hobby: Gaming Company: L. W. Seecamp Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nJames: Hobby: Vacation Company: Urban Outfitters Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Micah Stevens said: \"Hi there, I'm Micah. I couldn't help but notice your style, very sleek. It's an eye-catcher. You must be around someone who has a good sense of fashion, are you by any chance into hobbies like, let's say, kayaking or 'Go', the board game?\"\n\nTurn #1: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Hello Micah, I'm Jaxon. I do admire a good kayaking experience, it's quite an adventure I must say. And about fashion, well, you could say there's some influence around me. I also spotted that you are an enthusiast of board games. Do you know someone named Rafael by any chance? He loves kayaking as well, works for a big cable company, and enjoys mornings, best time of the day for him to relax.\"\n\nTurn #2: Micah Stevens said: \"Ah, Rafael! Yes, I believe I do know him. He's quite fond of the early hours, isn't he? Speaking of which, do you happen to have a friend who prefers the outdoors in the evening, perhaps even works at H. J. Heinz Company? Just curious, one of my friends who fits this description seems to know a lot of people.\"\n\nTurn #3: Jaxon Prentice said: \"An evening outdoor enthusiast at H. J. Heinz? Sorry, I don't think I know who that could be. However, I do have a friend Robin, who absolutely loves gaming and hanging outdoors but she's more of an evening person. Plus she works at a renowned firearms company. Does that sound familiar to you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Micah Stevens said: \"Hmm the description doesn't quite match. Perhaps we don't have this mutual friend after all. By the way, do you have any friends that love animal fancy as a hobby and enjoy their afternoons indoors? I know it's quite specific, but I find it so unique and I happen to know someone with these interests.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Animal fancy as a hobby, that's indeed unique! I can't say that it rings a bell though. My friend Robert likes to spend his afternoons indoors, but he is more into foraging, and he works for an international company in the refrigeration sector. I guess the uniqueness of hobbies is what keeps our social circles interesting, right?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Jaxon Prentice, your task is to act/speak as Jaxon Prentice would, keeping in mind Jaxon Prentice's social goal.\nYou can find Jaxon Prentice's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Jaxon Prentice's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Jaxon Prentice's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Micah Stevens and Jaxon Prentice\nMicah Stevens's background: \nJaxon Prentice's background: Jaxon Prentice is a 40-year-old male investigative journalist. He/him pronouns. Jaxon Prentice, an investigative journalist, is known for his brisk jogging sessions early in the morning and his active participation in community functions. Personality and values description: Jaxon Prentice, outgoing yet erratic, emphasizes achievement, power, and security. His decisions swing between quick adaptations to situations and careful planning. Jaxon's secrets: Fabricated evidence to incriminate a corrupt politician\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nJaxon Prentice's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nTina: Hobby: Lacemaking Company: Groupon Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRafael: Hobby: Kayaking Company: General Cable Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nWanda: Hobby: Weightlifting Company: Sauer-Danfoss Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRaymond: Hobby: Foraging Company: Chicago Bridge & Iron Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRicky: Hobby: Foraging Company: L. W. Seecamp Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRobert: Hobby: Foraging Company: Lennox International Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nFrances: Hobby: Foraging Company: Expedia Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nScott: Hobby: Gaming Company: Expedia Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nHelen: Hobby: Motor sports Company: Union Bank Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRobin: Hobby: Gaming Company: L. W. Seecamp Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nJames: Hobby: Vacation Company: Urban Outfitters Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Micah Stevens said: \"Hi there, I'm Micah. I couldn't help but notice your style, very sleek. It's an eye-catcher. You must be around someone who has a good sense of fashion, are you by any chance into hobbies like, let's say, kayaking or 'Go', the board game?\"\n\nTurn #1: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Hello Micah, I'm Jaxon. I do admire a good kayaking experience, it's quite an adventure I must say. And about fashion, well, you could say there's some influence around me. I also spotted that you are an enthusiast of board games. Do you know someone named Rafael by any chance? He loves kayaking as well, works for a big cable company, and enjoys mornings, best time of the day for him to relax.\"\n\nTurn #2: Micah Stevens said: \"Ah, Rafael! Yes, I believe I do know him. He's quite fond of the early hours, isn't he? Speaking of which, do you happen to have a friend who prefers the outdoors in the evening, perhaps even works at H. J. Heinz Company? Just curious, one of my friends who fits this description seems to know a lot of people.\"\n\nTurn #3: Jaxon Prentice said: \"An evening outdoor enthusiast at H. J. Heinz? Sorry, I don't think I know who that could be. However, I do have a friend Robin, who absolutely loves gaming and hanging outdoors but she's more of an evening person. Plus she works at a renowned firearms company. Does that sound familiar to you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Micah Stevens said: \"Hmm the description doesn't quite match. Perhaps we don't have this mutual friend after all. By the way, do you have any friends that love animal fancy as a hobby and enjoy their afternoons indoors? I know it's quite specific, but I find it so unique and I happen to know someone with these interests.\"\n\nTurn #5: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Animal fancy as a hobby, that's indeed unique! I can't say that it rings a bell though. My friend Robert likes to spend his afternoons indoors, but he is more into foraging, and he works for an international company in the refrigeration sector. I guess the uniqueness of hobbies is what keeps our social circles interesting, right?\"\n\nTurn #6: Micah Stevens said: \"Absolutely, Jaxon. The variety in hobbies indeed keeps our interactions colorful and exciting! Now, this may sound a bit strange, but do you know anyone who is into vacationing and has a knack for cooking sauces, maybe even works for a company that is famous for its ketchup? I only ask because I have a friend who fits this profile and he\u2019s quite the social butterfly.\"\n\nTurn #7: Jaxon Prentice said: \"That's a very specific description indeed, Micah! Unfortunately, I don't seem to know anyone who fits that particular profile. I do, however, have a friend named James who's an enthusiastic vacationer and works for a trendy clothing company. He loves the outdoors, especially in the mornings. Maybe they've crossed paths in their travels?\"\n\nTurn #8: Micah Stevens said: \"Ah, James, you said? The name does sound familiar, but I'm not too sure. He seems like an interesting fellow, though. Now, speaking of interesting, do you have any friends that are into learning foreign languages and prefer to spend their evenings indoors? I know it's a bit too specific, but I have an acquaintance who has this unique hobby.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Enjoying foreign languages, fascinating! I can't say I have friends with that particular interest though. Most of my friends are into outdoor morning activities. It's interesting how unique everyone's hobbies can be!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Jaxon Prentice, your task is to act/speak as Jaxon Prentice would, keeping in mind Jaxon Prentice's social goal.\nYou can find Jaxon Prentice's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Jaxon Prentice's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Jaxon Prentice's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Micah Stevens and Jaxon Prentice\nMicah Stevens's background: \nJaxon Prentice's background: Jaxon Prentice is a 40-year-old male investigative journalist. He/him pronouns. Jaxon Prentice, an investigative journalist, is known for his brisk jogging sessions early in the morning and his active participation in community functions. Personality and values description: Jaxon Prentice, outgoing yet erratic, emphasizes achievement, power, and security. His decisions swing between quick adaptations to situations and careful planning. Jaxon's secrets: Fabricated evidence to incriminate a corrupt politician\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nJaxon Prentice's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nTina: Hobby: Lacemaking Company: Groupon Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRafael: Hobby: Kayaking Company: General Cable Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nWanda: Hobby: Weightlifting Company: Sauer-Danfoss Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRaymond: Hobby: Foraging Company: Chicago Bridge & Iron Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRicky: Hobby: Foraging Company: L. W. Seecamp Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRobert: Hobby: Foraging Company: Lennox International Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nFrances: Hobby: Foraging Company: Expedia Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nScott: Hobby: Gaming Company: Expedia Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nHelen: Hobby: Motor sports Company: Union Bank Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRobin: Hobby: Gaming Company: L. W. Seecamp Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nJames: Hobby: Vacation Company: Urban Outfitters Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Micah Stevens said: \"Hi there, I'm Micah. I couldn't help but notice your style, very sleek. It's an eye-catcher. You must be around someone who has a good sense of fashion, are you by any chance into hobbies like, let's say, kayaking or 'Go', the board game?\"\n\nTurn #1: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Hello Micah, I'm Jaxon. I do admire a good kayaking experience, it's quite an adventure I must say. And about fashion, well, you could say there's some influence around me. I also spotted that you are an enthusiast of board games. Do you know someone named Rafael by any chance? He loves kayaking as well, works for a big cable company, and enjoys mornings, best time of the day for him to relax.\"\n\nTurn #2: Micah Stevens said: \"Ah, Rafael! Yes, I believe I do know him. He's quite fond of the early hours, isn't he? Speaking of which, do you happen to have a friend who prefers the outdoors in the evening, perhaps even works at H. J. Heinz Company? Just curious, one of my friends who fits this description seems to know a lot of people.\"\n\nTurn #3: Jaxon Prentice said: \"An evening outdoor enthusiast at H. J. Heinz? Sorry, I don't think I know who that could be. However, I do have a friend Robin, who absolutely loves gaming and hanging outdoors but she's more of an evening person. Plus she works at a renowned firearms company. Does that sound familiar to you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Micah Stevens said: \"Hmm the description doesn't quite match. Perhaps we don't have this mutual friend after all. By the way, do you have any friends that love animal fancy as a hobby and enjoy their afternoons indoors? I know it's quite specific, but I find it so unique and I happen to know someone with these interests.\"\n\nTurn #5: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Animal fancy as a hobby, that's indeed unique! I can't say that it rings a bell though. My friend Robert likes to spend his afternoons indoors, but he is more into foraging, and he works for an international company in the refrigeration sector. I guess the uniqueness of hobbies is what keeps our social circles interesting, right?\"\n\nTurn #6: Micah Stevens said: \"Absolutely, Jaxon. The variety in hobbies indeed keeps our interactions colorful and exciting! Now, this may sound a bit strange, but do you know anyone who is into vacationing and has a knack for cooking sauces, maybe even works for a company that is famous for its ketchup? I only ask because I have a friend who fits this profile and he\u2019s quite the social butterfly.\"\n\nTurn #7: Jaxon Prentice said: \"That's a very specific description indeed, Micah! Unfortunately, I don't seem to know anyone who fits that particular profile. I do, however, have a friend named James who's an enthusiastic vacationer and works for a trendy clothing company. He loves the outdoors, especially in the mornings. Maybe they've crossed paths in their travels?\"\n\nTurn #8: Micah Stevens said: \"Ah, James, you said? The name does sound familiar, but I'm not too sure. He seems like an interesting fellow, though. Now, speaking of interesting, do you have any friends that are into learning foreign languages and prefer to spend their evenings indoors? I know it's a bit too specific, but I have an acquaintance who has this unique hobby.\"\n\nTurn #9: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Enjoying foreign languages, fascinating! I can't say I have friends with that particular interest though. Most of my friends are into outdoor morning activities. It's interesting how unique everyone's hobbies can be!\"\n\nTurn #10: Micah Stevens said: \"Indeed, it's the diversity that makes life enjoyable, Jaxon. By the way, do you happen to know someone who's employed by General Cable, prefers to stay indoors in the afternoon, and enjoys watching television? Just asking out of curiosity.\"\n\nTurn #11: Jaxon Prentice said: \"General Cable and an afternoon television enthusiast? That's definitely ringing a bell. Might be thinking of my friend Rafael, though he's more of a kayaking enthusiast than a television watcher. Small world, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #12: Micah Stevens said: \"Oh, Rafael seems like a pretty versatile guy! Talking of the indoors, do you know someone who likes to play 'Go', the board game, in the evenings and works for an international management consulting firm? Just a thought, no harm in asking.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"'Go' the board game, and working for an international management consulting firm? I'm afraid that doesn't ring a bell. I do have friends who like board games, but none who fits this exact description. It's fascinating to see how varied the interests of people can be, isn't it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Jaxon Prentice, your task is to act/speak as Jaxon Prentice would, keeping in mind Jaxon Prentice's social goal.\nYou can find Jaxon Prentice's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Jaxon Prentice's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Jaxon Prentice's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Micah Stevens and Jaxon Prentice\nMicah Stevens's background: \nJaxon Prentice's background: Jaxon Prentice is a 40-year-old male investigative journalist. He/him pronouns. Jaxon Prentice, an investigative journalist, is known for his brisk jogging sessions early in the morning and his active participation in community functions. Personality and values description: Jaxon Prentice, outgoing yet erratic, emphasizes achievement, power, and security. His decisions swing between quick adaptations to situations and careful planning. Jaxon's secrets: Fabricated evidence to incriminate a corrupt politician\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nJaxon Prentice's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nTina: Hobby: Lacemaking Company: Groupon Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRafael: Hobby: Kayaking Company: General Cable Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nWanda: Hobby: Weightlifting Company: Sauer-Danfoss Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRaymond: Hobby: Foraging Company: Chicago Bridge & Iron Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRicky: Hobby: Foraging Company: L. W. Seecamp Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRobert: Hobby: Foraging Company: Lennox International Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nFrances: Hobby: Foraging Company: Expedia Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nScott: Hobby: Gaming Company: Expedia Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nHelen: Hobby: Motor sports Company: Union Bank Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRobin: Hobby: Gaming Company: L. W. Seecamp Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nJames: Hobby: Vacation Company: Urban Outfitters Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Micah Stevens said: \"Hi there, I'm Micah. I couldn't help but notice your style, very sleek. It's an eye-catcher. You must be around someone who has a good sense of fashion, are you by any chance into hobbies like, let's say, kayaking or 'Go', the board game?\"\n\nTurn #1: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Hello Micah, I'm Jaxon. I do admire a good kayaking experience, it's quite an adventure I must say. And about fashion, well, you could say there's some influence around me. I also spotted that you are an enthusiast of board games. Do you know someone named Rafael by any chance? He loves kayaking as well, works for a big cable company, and enjoys mornings, best time of the day for him to relax.\"\n\nTurn #2: Micah Stevens said: \"Ah, Rafael! Yes, I believe I do know him. He's quite fond of the early hours, isn't he? Speaking of which, do you happen to have a friend who prefers the outdoors in the evening, perhaps even works at H. J. Heinz Company? Just curious, one of my friends who fits this description seems to know a lot of people.\"\n\nTurn #3: Jaxon Prentice said: \"An evening outdoor enthusiast at H. J. Heinz? Sorry, I don't think I know who that could be. However, I do have a friend Robin, who absolutely loves gaming and hanging outdoors but she's more of an evening person. Plus she works at a renowned firearms company. Does that sound familiar to you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Micah Stevens said: \"Hmm the description doesn't quite match. Perhaps we don't have this mutual friend after all. By the way, do you have any friends that love animal fancy as a hobby and enjoy their afternoons indoors? I know it's quite specific, but I find it so unique and I happen to know someone with these interests.\"\n\nTurn #5: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Animal fancy as a hobby, that's indeed unique! I can't say that it rings a bell though. My friend Robert likes to spend his afternoons indoors, but he is more into foraging, and he works for an international company in the refrigeration sector. I guess the uniqueness of hobbies is what keeps our social circles interesting, right?\"\n\nTurn #6: Micah Stevens said: \"Absolutely, Jaxon. The variety in hobbies indeed keeps our interactions colorful and exciting! Now, this may sound a bit strange, but do you know anyone who is into vacationing and has a knack for cooking sauces, maybe even works for a company that is famous for its ketchup? I only ask because I have a friend who fits this profile and he\u2019s quite the social butterfly.\"\n\nTurn #7: Jaxon Prentice said: \"That's a very specific description indeed, Micah! Unfortunately, I don't seem to know anyone who fits that particular profile. I do, however, have a friend named James who's an enthusiastic vacationer and works for a trendy clothing company. He loves the outdoors, especially in the mornings. Maybe they've crossed paths in their travels?\"\n\nTurn #8: Micah Stevens said: \"Ah, James, you said? The name does sound familiar, but I'm not too sure. He seems like an interesting fellow, though. Now, speaking of interesting, do you have any friends that are into learning foreign languages and prefer to spend their evenings indoors? I know it's a bit too specific, but I have an acquaintance who has this unique hobby.\"\n\nTurn #9: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Enjoying foreign languages, fascinating! I can't say I have friends with that particular interest though. Most of my friends are into outdoor morning activities. It's interesting how unique everyone's hobbies can be!\"\n\nTurn #10: Micah Stevens said: \"Indeed, it's the diversity that makes life enjoyable, Jaxon. By the way, do you happen to know someone who's employed by General Cable, prefers to stay indoors in the afternoon, and enjoys watching television? Just asking out of curiosity.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"General Cable and an afternoon television enthusiast? That's definitely ringing a bell. Might be thinking of my friend Rafael, though he's more of a kayaking enthusiast than a television watcher. Small world, isn't it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Jaxon Prentice, your task is to act/speak as Jaxon Prentice would, keeping in mind Jaxon Prentice's social goal.\nYou can find Jaxon Prentice's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Jaxon Prentice's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Jaxon Prentice's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Micah Stevens and Jaxon Prentice\nMicah Stevens's background: \nJaxon Prentice's background: Jaxon Prentice is a 40-year-old male investigative journalist. He/him pronouns. Jaxon Prentice, an investigative journalist, is known for his brisk jogging sessions early in the morning and his active participation in community functions. Personality and values description: Jaxon Prentice, outgoing yet erratic, emphasizes achievement, power, and security. His decisions swing between quick adaptations to situations and careful planning. Jaxon's secrets: Fabricated evidence to incriminate a corrupt politician\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nJaxon Prentice's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nTina: Hobby: Lacemaking Company: Groupon Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRafael: Hobby: Kayaking Company: General Cable Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nWanda: Hobby: Weightlifting Company: Sauer-Danfoss Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRaymond: Hobby: Foraging Company: Chicago Bridge & Iron Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRicky: Hobby: Foraging Company: L. W. Seecamp Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRobert: Hobby: Foraging Company: Lennox International Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nFrances: Hobby: Foraging Company: Expedia Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nScott: Hobby: Gaming Company: Expedia Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nHelen: Hobby: Motor sports Company: Union Bank Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRobin: Hobby: Gaming Company: L. W. Seecamp Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nJames: Hobby: Vacation Company: Urban Outfitters Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Micah Stevens said: \"Hi there, I'm Micah. I couldn't help but notice your style, very sleek. It's an eye-catcher. You must be around someone who has a good sense of fashion, are you by any chance into hobbies like, let's say, kayaking or 'Go', the board game?\"\n\nTurn #1: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Hello Micah, I'm Jaxon. I do admire a good kayaking experience, it's quite an adventure I must say. And about fashion, well, you could say there's some influence around me. I also spotted that you are an enthusiast of board games. Do you know someone named Rafael by any chance? He loves kayaking as well, works for a big cable company, and enjoys mornings, best time of the day for him to relax.\"\n\nTurn #2: Micah Stevens said: \"Ah, Rafael! Yes, I believe I do know him. He's quite fond of the early hours, isn't he? Speaking of which, do you happen to have a friend who prefers the outdoors in the evening, perhaps even works at H. J. Heinz Company? Just curious, one of my friends who fits this description seems to know a lot of people.\"\n\nTurn #3: Jaxon Prentice said: \"An evening outdoor enthusiast at H. J. Heinz? Sorry, I don't think I know who that could be. However, I do have a friend Robin, who absolutely loves gaming and hanging outdoors but she's more of an evening person. Plus she works at a renowned firearms company. Does that sound familiar to you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Micah Stevens said: \"Hmm the description doesn't quite match. Perhaps we don't have this mutual friend after all. By the way, do you have any friends that love animal fancy as a hobby and enjoy their afternoons indoors? I know it's quite specific, but I find it so unique and I happen to know someone with these interests.\"\n\nTurn #5: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Animal fancy as a hobby, that's indeed unique! I can't say that it rings a bell though. My friend Robert likes to spend his afternoons indoors, but he is more into foraging, and he works for an international company in the refrigeration sector. I guess the uniqueness of hobbies is what keeps our social circles interesting, right?\"\n\nTurn #6: Micah Stevens said: \"Absolutely, Jaxon. The variety in hobbies indeed keeps our interactions colorful and exciting! Now, this may sound a bit strange, but do you know anyone who is into vacationing and has a knack for cooking sauces, maybe even works for a company that is famous for its ketchup? I only ask because I have a friend who fits this profile and he\u2019s quite the social butterfly.\"\n\nTurn #7: Jaxon Prentice said: \"That's a very specific description indeed, Micah! Unfortunately, I don't seem to know anyone who fits that particular profile. I do, however, have a friend named James who's an enthusiastic vacationer and works for a trendy clothing company. He loves the outdoors, especially in the mornings. Maybe they've crossed paths in their travels?\"\n\nTurn #8: Micah Stevens said: \"Ah, James, you said? The name does sound familiar, but I'm not too sure. He seems like an interesting fellow, though. Now, speaking of interesting, do you have any friends that are into learning foreign languages and prefer to spend their evenings indoors? I know it's a bit too specific, but I have an acquaintance who has this unique hobby.\"\n\nTurn #9: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Enjoying foreign languages, fascinating! I can't say I have friends with that particular interest though. Most of my friends are into outdoor morning activities. It's interesting how unique everyone's hobbies can be!\"\n\nTurn #10: Micah Stevens said: \"Indeed, it's the diversity that makes life enjoyable, Jaxon. By the way, do you happen to know someone who's employed by General Cable, prefers to stay indoors in the afternoon, and enjoys watching television? Just asking out of curiosity.\"\n\nTurn #11: Jaxon Prentice said: \"General Cable and an afternoon television enthusiast? That's definitely ringing a bell. Might be thinking of my friend Rafael, though he's more of a kayaking enthusiast than a television watcher. Small world, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #12: Micah Stevens said: \"Oh, Rafael seems like a pretty versatile guy! Talking of the indoors, do you know someone who likes to play 'Go', the board game, in the evenings and works for an international management consulting firm? Just a thought, no harm in asking.\"\n\nTurn #13: Jaxon Prentice said: \"'Go' the board game, and working for an international management consulting firm? I'm afraid that doesn't ring a bell. I do have friends who like board games, but none who fits this exact description. It's fascinating to see how varied the interests of people can be, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #14: Micah Stevens said: \"You're absolutely right, Jaxon. It's the different hobbies and interests that make social connections so enriching. By the way, do you happen to know anyone who loves animal fancy, spends their afternoons indoors, and works in a company known for its ketchup?\"\n\nTurn #15: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Animal fancy, indoor afternoons, and a company known for its ketchup? You have quite a unique set of friends, Micah, but as it happens, none of mine match that description. It's certainly an intriguing combination of interests and occupation, though.\"\n\nTurn #16: Micah Stevens said: \"It sure is! This chat has been quite an enjoyable diversion. By any chance, do you have a friend who gets their kicks from kayaking and works somewhere famous for their hydraulics, maybe an outdoor person who enjoys the afternoon?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"An afternoon kayak enthusiast who works with hydraulics, that does sound like Wanda! She's an executive at a company known for its hydraulic machinery. Her perfect day starts with some intense weightlifting, and she takes advantage of the beautiful weather in the afternoons for her passion - kayaking. Now, isn't that something?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Jaxon Prentice, your task is to act/speak as Jaxon Prentice would, keeping in mind Jaxon Prentice's social goal.\nYou can find Jaxon Prentice's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Jaxon Prentice's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Jaxon Prentice's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Micah Stevens and Jaxon Prentice\nMicah Stevens's background: \nJaxon Prentice's background: Jaxon Prentice is a 40-year-old male investigative journalist. He/him pronouns. Jaxon Prentice, an investigative journalist, is known for his brisk jogging sessions early in the morning and his active participation in community functions. Personality and values description: Jaxon Prentice, outgoing yet erratic, emphasizes achievement, power, and security. His decisions swing between quick adaptations to situations and careful planning. Jaxon's secrets: Fabricated evidence to incriminate a corrupt politician\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nJaxon Prentice's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nTina: Hobby: Lacemaking Company: Groupon Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRafael: Hobby: Kayaking Company: General Cable Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nWanda: Hobby: Weightlifting Company: Sauer-Danfoss Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRaymond: Hobby: Foraging Company: Chicago Bridge & Iron Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRicky: Hobby: Foraging Company: L. W. Seecamp Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRobert: Hobby: Foraging Company: Lennox International Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nFrances: Hobby: Foraging Company: Expedia Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nScott: Hobby: Gaming Company: Expedia Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nHelen: Hobby: Motor sports Company: Union Bank Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRobin: Hobby: Gaming Company: L. W. Seecamp Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nJames: Hobby: Vacation Company: Urban Outfitters Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Micah Stevens said: \"Hi there, I'm Micah. I couldn't help but notice your style, very sleek. It's an eye-catcher. You must be around someone who has a good sense of fashion, are you by any chance into hobbies like, let's say, kayaking or 'Go', the board game?\"\n\nTurn #1: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Hello Micah, I'm Jaxon. I do admire a good kayaking experience, it's quite an adventure I must say. And about fashion, well, you could say there's some influence around me. I also spotted that you are an enthusiast of board games. Do you know someone named Rafael by any chance? He loves kayaking as well, works for a big cable company, and enjoys mornings, best time of the day for him to relax.\"\n\nTurn #2: Micah Stevens said: \"Ah, Rafael! Yes, I believe I do know him. He's quite fond of the early hours, isn't he? Speaking of which, do you happen to have a friend who prefers the outdoors in the evening, perhaps even works at H. J. Heinz Company? Just curious, one of my friends who fits this description seems to know a lot of people.\"\n\nTurn #3: Jaxon Prentice said: \"An evening outdoor enthusiast at H. J. Heinz? Sorry, I don't think I know who that could be. However, I do have a friend Robin, who absolutely loves gaming and hanging outdoors but she's more of an evening person. Plus she works at a renowned firearms company. Does that sound familiar to you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Micah Stevens said: \"Hmm the description doesn't quite match. Perhaps we don't have this mutual friend after all. By the way, do you have any friends that love animal fancy as a hobby and enjoy their afternoons indoors? I know it's quite specific, but I find it so unique and I happen to know someone with these interests.\"\n\nTurn #5: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Animal fancy as a hobby, that's indeed unique! I can't say that it rings a bell though. My friend Robert likes to spend his afternoons indoors, but he is more into foraging, and he works for an international company in the refrigeration sector. I guess the uniqueness of hobbies is what keeps our social circles interesting, right?\"\n\nTurn #6: Micah Stevens said: \"Absolutely, Jaxon. The variety in hobbies indeed keeps our interactions colorful and exciting! Now, this may sound a bit strange, but do you know anyone who is into vacationing and has a knack for cooking sauces, maybe even works for a company that is famous for its ketchup? I only ask because I have a friend who fits this profile and he\u2019s quite the social butterfly.\"\n\nTurn #7: Jaxon Prentice said: \"That's a very specific description indeed, Micah! Unfortunately, I don't seem to know anyone who fits that particular profile. I do, however, have a friend named James who's an enthusiastic vacationer and works for a trendy clothing company. He loves the outdoors, especially in the mornings. Maybe they've crossed paths in their travels?\"\n\nTurn #8: Micah Stevens said: \"Ah, James, you said? The name does sound familiar, but I'm not too sure. He seems like an interesting fellow, though. Now, speaking of interesting, do you have any friends that are into learning foreign languages and prefer to spend their evenings indoors? I know it's a bit too specific, but I have an acquaintance who has this unique hobby.\"\n\nTurn #9: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Enjoying foreign languages, fascinating! I can't say I have friends with that particular interest though. Most of my friends are into outdoor morning activities. It's interesting how unique everyone's hobbies can be!\"\n\nTurn #10: Micah Stevens said: \"Indeed, it's the diversity that makes life enjoyable, Jaxon. By the way, do you happen to know someone who's employed by General Cable, prefers to stay indoors in the afternoon, and enjoys watching television? Just asking out of curiosity.\"\n\nTurn #11: Jaxon Prentice said: \"General Cable and an afternoon television enthusiast? That's definitely ringing a bell. Might be thinking of my friend Rafael, though he's more of a kayaking enthusiast than a television watcher. Small world, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #12: Micah Stevens said: \"Oh, Rafael seems like a pretty versatile guy! Talking of the indoors, do you know someone who likes to play 'Go', the board game, in the evenings and works for an international management consulting firm? Just a thought, no harm in asking.\"\n\nTurn #13: Jaxon Prentice said: \"'Go' the board game, and working for an international management consulting firm? I'm afraid that doesn't ring a bell. I do have friends who like board games, but none who fits this exact description. It's fascinating to see how varied the interests of people can be, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #14: Micah Stevens said: \"You're absolutely right, Jaxon. It's the different hobbies and interests that make social connections so enriching. By the way, do you happen to know anyone who loves animal fancy, spends their afternoons indoors, and works in a company known for its ketchup?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Animal fancy, indoor afternoons, and a company known for its ketchup? You have quite a unique set of friends, Micah, but as it happens, none of mine match that description. It's certainly an intriguing combination of interests and occupation, though.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Jaxon Prentice, your task is to act/speak as Jaxon Prentice would, keeping in mind Jaxon Prentice's social goal.\nYou can find Jaxon Prentice's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Jaxon Prentice's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Jaxon Prentice's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Micah Stevens and Jaxon Prentice\nMicah Stevens's background: \nJaxon Prentice's background: Jaxon Prentice is a 40-year-old male investigative journalist. He/him pronouns. Jaxon Prentice, an investigative journalist, is known for his brisk jogging sessions early in the morning and his active participation in community functions. Personality and values description: Jaxon Prentice, outgoing yet erratic, emphasizes achievement, power, and security. His decisions swing between quick adaptations to situations and careful planning. Jaxon's secrets: Fabricated evidence to incriminate a corrupt politician\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nJaxon Prentice's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nTina: Hobby: Lacemaking Company: Groupon Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRafael: Hobby: Kayaking Company: General Cable Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nWanda: Hobby: Weightlifting Company: Sauer-Danfoss Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRaymond: Hobby: Foraging Company: Chicago Bridge & Iron Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRicky: Hobby: Foraging Company: L. W. Seecamp Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRobert: Hobby: Foraging Company: Lennox International Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nFrances: Hobby: Foraging Company: Expedia Time Preference: morning Location Preference: indoor \nScott: Hobby: Gaming Company: Expedia Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nHelen: Hobby: Motor sports Company: Union Bank Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nRobin: Hobby: Gaming Company: L. W. Seecamp Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nJames: Hobby: Vacation Company: Urban Outfitters Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Micah Stevens said: \"Hi there, I'm Micah. I couldn't help but notice your style, very sleek. It's an eye-catcher. You must be around someone who has a good sense of fashion, are you by any chance into hobbies like, let's say, kayaking or 'Go', the board game?\"\n\nTurn #1: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Hello Micah, I'm Jaxon. I do admire a good kayaking experience, it's quite an adventure I must say. And about fashion, well, you could say there's some influence around me. I also spotted that you are an enthusiast of board games. Do you know someone named Rafael by any chance? He loves kayaking as well, works for a big cable company, and enjoys mornings, best time of the day for him to relax.\"\n\nTurn #2: Micah Stevens said: \"Ah, Rafael! Yes, I believe I do know him. He's quite fond of the early hours, isn't he? Speaking of which, do you happen to have a friend who prefers the outdoors in the evening, perhaps even works at H. J. Heinz Company? Just curious, one of my friends who fits this description seems to know a lot of people.\"\n\nTurn #3: Jaxon Prentice said: \"An evening outdoor enthusiast at H. J. Heinz? Sorry, I don't think I know who that could be. However, I do have a friend Robin, who absolutely loves gaming and hanging outdoors but she's more of an evening person. Plus she works at a renowned firearms company. Does that sound familiar to you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Micah Stevens said: \"Hmm the description doesn't quite match. Perhaps we don't have this mutual friend after all. By the way, do you have any friends that love animal fancy as a hobby and enjoy their afternoons indoors? I know it's quite specific, but I find it so unique and I happen to know someone with these interests.\"\n\nTurn #5: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Animal fancy as a hobby, that's indeed unique! I can't say that it rings a bell though. My friend Robert likes to spend his afternoons indoors, but he is more into foraging, and he works for an international company in the refrigeration sector. I guess the uniqueness of hobbies is what keeps our social circles interesting, right?\"\n\nTurn #6: Micah Stevens said: \"Absolutely, Jaxon. The variety in hobbies indeed keeps our interactions colorful and exciting! Now, this may sound a bit strange, but do you know anyone who is into vacationing and has a knack for cooking sauces, maybe even works for a company that is famous for its ketchup? I only ask because I have a friend who fits this profile and he\u2019s quite the social butterfly.\"\n\nTurn #7: Jaxon Prentice said: \"That's a very specific description indeed, Micah! Unfortunately, I don't seem to know anyone who fits that particular profile. I do, however, have a friend named James who's an enthusiastic vacationer and works for a trendy clothing company. He loves the outdoors, especially in the mornings. Maybe they've crossed paths in their travels?\"\n\nTurn #8: Micah Stevens said: \"Ah, James, you said? The name does sound familiar, but I'm not too sure. He seems like an interesting fellow, though. Now, speaking of interesting, do you have any friends that are into learning foreign languages and prefer to spend their evenings indoors? I know it's a bit too specific, but I have an acquaintance who has this unique hobby.\"\n\nTurn #9: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Enjoying foreign languages, fascinating! I can't say I have friends with that particular interest though. Most of my friends are into outdoor morning activities. It's interesting how unique everyone's hobbies can be!\"\n\nTurn #10: Micah Stevens said: \"Indeed, it's the diversity that makes life enjoyable, Jaxon. By the way, do you happen to know someone who's employed by General Cable, prefers to stay indoors in the afternoon, and enjoys watching television? Just asking out of curiosity.\"\n\nTurn #11: Jaxon Prentice said: \"General Cable and an afternoon television enthusiast? That's definitely ringing a bell. Might be thinking of my friend Rafael, though he's more of a kayaking enthusiast than a television watcher. Small world, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #12: Micah Stevens said: \"Oh, Rafael seems like a pretty versatile guy! Talking of the indoors, do you know someone who likes to play 'Go', the board game, in the evenings and works for an international management consulting firm? Just a thought, no harm in asking.\"\n\nTurn #13: Jaxon Prentice said: \"'Go' the board game, and working for an international management consulting firm? I'm afraid that doesn't ring a bell. I do have friends who like board games, but none who fits this exact description. It's fascinating to see how varied the interests of people can be, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #14: Micah Stevens said: \"You're absolutely right, Jaxon. It's the different hobbies and interests that make social connections so enriching. By the way, do you happen to know anyone who loves animal fancy, spends their afternoons indoors, and works in a company known for its ketchup?\"\n\nTurn #15: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Animal fancy, indoor afternoons, and a company known for its ketchup? You have quite a unique set of friends, Micah, but as it happens, none of mine match that description. It's certainly an intriguing combination of interests and occupation, though.\"\n\nTurn #16: Micah Stevens said: \"It sure is! This chat has been quite an enjoyable diversion. By any chance, do you have a friend who gets their kicks from kayaking and works somewhere famous for their hydraulics, maybe an outdoor person who enjoys the afternoon?\"\n\nTurn #17: Jaxon Prentice said: \"An afternoon kayak enthusiast who works with hydraulics, that does sound like Wanda! She's an executive at a company known for its hydraulic machinery. Her perfect day starts with some intense weightlifting, and she takes advantage of the beautiful weather in the afternoons for her passion - kayaking. Now, isn't that something?\"\n\nTurn #18: Micah Stevens said: \"Fascinating, Jaxon! Wanda seems like quite an interesting character. With people having such varied interests and hobbies, it really does make our social circles exciting! Still on the topic of friends, do you have any who love to play 'Go', the board game, and work for McKinsey & Company? I know it's a bit particular, but just trying to piece together a possible connection.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #19. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"'Go', the board game, and McKinsey & Company, that's rather specific, Micah. Unfortunately, none of my friends fits that description. It does show how unique and intriguing everyone's interests can be though. Diversity truly makes our social tapestry more vibrant, doesn't it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two people deciding on how to divide the collected fruits. There are 3 apples, 2 bananas, 1 orange in total.\nParticipants: Ethan Smith and Noah Davis\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nNoah Davis's background: \nEthan Smith's goal: Maximize the points by getting the most favored fruits (Extra information: For you, 1 apple = 1 point, 1 banana = 2 points, 1 orange = 3 points Hint: you and the other person value the fruits differently, try to find a win-win solution.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Noah, since we have these fruits, why don't we divide them up? Any particular preference you have?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two people deciding on how to divide the collected fruits. There are 3 apples, 2 bananas, 1 orange in total.\nParticipants: Ethan Smith and Noah Davis\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nNoah Davis's background: \nEthan Smith's goal: Maximize the points by getting the most favored fruits (Extra information: For you, 1 apple = 1 point, 1 banana = 2 points, 1 orange = 3 points Hint: you and the other person value the fruits differently, try to find a win-win solution.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Smith said: \"Hey Noah, since we have these fruits, why don't we divide them up? Any particular preference you have?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Ethan, if it's all the same to you, I wouldn't mind having the apples. They're my favorite. How does that sound to you?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'That sounds great, Noah! You can take the apples. I actually enjoy bananas and that orange looks rather tempting. Would you be okay with me taking them?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two people deciding on how to divide the collected fruits. There are 3 apples, 2 bananas, 1 orange in total.\nParticipants: Ethan Smith and Noah Davis\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nNoah Davis's background: \nEthan Smith's goal: Maximize the points by getting the most favored fruits (Extra information: For you, 1 apple = 1 point, 1 banana = 2 points, 1 orange = 3 points Hint: you and the other person value the fruits differently, try to find a win-win solution.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Smith said: \"Hey Noah, since we have these fruits, why don't we divide them up? Any particular preference you have?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Ethan, if it's all the same to you, I wouldn't mind having the apples. They're my favorite. How does that sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Smith said: \"That sounds great, Noah! You can take the apples. I actually enjoy bananas and that orange looks rather tempting. Would you be okay with me taking them?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Sounds like a good plan, Ethan! You can take the bananas and the orange. That works perfectly for me.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Excellent, Noah! I'm glad we figured this out smoothly. Enjoy your apples!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two people deciding on how to divide the collected fruits. There are 3 apples, 2 bananas, 1 orange in total.\nParticipants: Ethan Smith and Noah Davis\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nNoah Davis's background: \nEthan Smith's goal: Maximize the points by getting the most favored fruits (Extra information: For you, 1 apple = 1 point, 1 banana = 2 points, 1 orange = 3 points Hint: you and the other person value the fruits differently, try to find a win-win solution.)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Smith said: \"Hey Noah, since we have these fruits, why don't we divide them up? Any particular preference you have?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Ethan, if it's all the same to you, I wouldn't mind having the apples. They're my favorite. How does that sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Smith said: \"That sounds great, Noah! You can take the apples. I actually enjoy bananas and that orange looks rather tempting. Would you be okay with me taking them?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Sounds like a good plan, Ethan! You can take the bananas and the orange. That works perfectly for me.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Smith said: \"Excellent, Noah! I'm glad we figured this out smoothly. Enjoy your apples!\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Thanks, Ethan! I'm sure we'll both enjoy our fruits. Have a great day!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two people deciding on how to divide the collected fruits. There are 3 apples, 2 bananas, 1 orange in total.\nParticipants: Ethan Smith and Noah Davis\nEthan Smith's background: \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Maximize the points by getting the most favored fruits (Extra information: For you, 1 apple = 3 points, 1 banana = 1 point, 1 orange = 2 points Hint: you and the other person value the fruits differently, try to find a win-win solution.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Smith said: \"Hey Noah, since we have these fruits, why don't we divide them up? Any particular preference you have?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Ethan, if it's all the same to you, I wouldn't mind having the apples. They're my favorite. How does that sound to you?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two people deciding on how to divide the collected fruits. There are 3 apples, 2 bananas, 1 orange in total.\nParticipants: Ethan Smith and Noah Davis\nEthan Smith's background: \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Maximize the points by getting the most favored fruits (Extra information: For you, 1 apple = 3 points, 1 banana = 1 point, 1 orange = 2 points Hint: you and the other person value the fruits differently, try to find a win-win solution.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Smith said: \"Hey Noah, since we have these fruits, why don't we divide them up? Any particular preference you have?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Ethan, if it's all the same to you, I wouldn't mind having the apples. They're my favorite. How does that sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Smith said: \"That sounds great, Noah! You can take the apples. I actually enjoy bananas and that orange looks rather tempting. Would you be okay with me taking them?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Sounds like a good plan, Ethan! You can take the bananas and the orange. That works perfectly for me.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two people deciding on how to divide the collected fruits. There are 3 apples, 2 bananas, 1 orange in total.\nParticipants: Ethan Smith and Noah Davis\nEthan Smith's background: \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Maximize the points by getting the most favored fruits (Extra information: For you, 1 apple = 3 points, 1 banana = 1 point, 1 orange = 2 points Hint: you and the other person value the fruits differently, try to find a win-win solution.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Smith said: \"Hey Noah, since we have these fruits, why don't we divide them up? Any particular preference you have?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Ethan, if it's all the same to you, I wouldn't mind having the apples. They're my favorite. How does that sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Smith said: \"That sounds great, Noah! You can take the apples. I actually enjoy bananas and that orange looks rather tempting. Would you be okay with me taking them?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Sounds like a good plan, Ethan! You can take the bananas and the orange. That works perfectly for me.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Smith said: \"Excellent, Noah! I'm glad we figured this out smoothly. Enjoy your apples!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thanks, Ethan! I'm sure we'll both enjoy our fruits. Have a great day!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two people deciding on how to divide the collected fruits. There are 3 apples, 2 bananas, 1 orange in total.\nParticipants: Ethan Smith and Noah Davis\nEthan Smith's background: \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Maximize the points by getting the most favored fruits (Extra information: For you, 1 apple = 3 points, 1 banana = 1 point, 1 orange = 2 points Hint: you and the other person value the fruits differently, try to find a win-win solution.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Smith said: \"Hey Noah, since we have these fruits, why don't we divide them up? Any particular preference you have?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hey Ethan, if it's all the same to you, I wouldn't mind having the apples. They're my favorite. How does that sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Smith said: \"That sounds great, Noah! You can take the apples. I actually enjoy bananas and that orange looks rather tempting. Would you be okay with me taking them?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Sounds like a good plan, Ethan! You can take the bananas and the orange. That works perfectly for me.\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Smith said: \"Excellent, Noah! I'm glad we figured this out smoothly. Enjoy your apples!\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Thanks, Ethan! I'm sure we'll both enjoy our fruits. Have a great day!\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Smith left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is selling a couch, loveseat, chair, and ottoman set for $550.0, while another person is keen to purchase it. The set of furniture is described as being incredibly comfortable. The seller's wife wishes to upgrade to a new, stiffer couch, hence the sale. Despite some light staining from life's little incidents, the set is in great condition. The comfort of the furniture is particularly emphasized by the seller.\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nZane Bennett's background: \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: You are the buyer for this item, with a target price of $418.0. If you end up purchasing it for a price significantly higher than the target, you will be penalized. However, if you manage to acquire it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nZane Bennett's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hey Zane, I can see that you appreciate comfort as much as I do, based on your description of the set. Could you tell me more about the staining? Given the slight damage, I'm thinking a price drop might be fair, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Hi Giselle, sure thing. So the staining is minimal and does not diminish the comfort of the set at all. They are the results of everyday use, nothing excessive. However, I do understand your concern. While I mentioned the set for $550, I'd be willing to consider an offer. What price range were you considering?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I completely understand, Zane. Daily life does leave its little marks. In light of these stains, though, I was thinking of something along the lines of $400. The set sounds comfortable, and that's really what I'm looking for. Does $400 sound alright to you?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is selling a couch, loveseat, chair, and ottoman set for $550.0, while another person is keen to purchase it. The set of furniture is described as being incredibly comfortable. The seller's wife wishes to upgrade to a new, stiffer couch, hence the sale. Despite some light staining from life's little incidents, the set is in great condition. The comfort of the furniture is particularly emphasized by the seller.\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nZane Bennett's background: \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: You are the buyer for this item, with a target price of $418.0. If you end up purchasing it for a price significantly higher than the target, you will be penalized. However, if you manage to acquire it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nZane Bennett's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hey Zane, I can see that you appreciate comfort as much as I do, based on your description of the set. Could you tell me more about the staining? Given the slight damage, I'm thinking a price drop might be fair, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Hi Giselle, sure thing. So the staining is minimal and does not diminish the comfort of the set at all. They are the results of everyday use, nothing excessive. However, I do understand your concern. While I mentioned the set for $550, I'd be willing to consider an offer. What price range were you considering?\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I completely understand, Zane. Daily life does leave its little marks. In light of these stains, though, I was thinking of something along the lines of $400. The set sounds comfortable, and that's really what I'm looking for. Does $400 sound alright to you?\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"I see where you're coming from, Giselle. Comfort is such a crucial aspect of a good furniture set, isn't it? And this set truly excels at that. How about meeting halfway? I would be comfortable settling at $450. It's slightly above what you suggested, but considering the furniture's excellent condition and unparalleled comfort, I believe it's a very fair price. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're right, Zane. Comfort is definitely important, and I'm sure this set is as comfortable as you emphasize. How about we compromise a bit more and settle at $430? It's a bit more than I initially planned, but considering your description and the condition of the furniture, I think it would be fair. What do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is selling a couch, loveseat, chair, and ottoman set for $550.0, while another person is keen to purchase it. The set of furniture is described as being incredibly comfortable. The seller's wife wishes to upgrade to a new, stiffer couch, hence the sale. Despite some light staining from life's little incidents, the set is in great condition. The comfort of the furniture is particularly emphasized by the seller.\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nZane Bennett's background: \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: You are the buyer for this item, with a target price of $418.0. If you end up purchasing it for a price significantly higher than the target, you will be penalized. However, if you manage to acquire it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nZane Bennett's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Zane, I can see that you appreciate comfort as much as I do, based on your description of the set. Could you tell me more about the staining? Given the slight damage, I'm thinking a price drop might be fair, don't you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is selling a couch, loveseat, chair, and ottoman set for $550.0, while another person is keen to purchase it. The set of furniture is described as being incredibly comfortable. The seller's wife wishes to upgrade to a new, stiffer couch, hence the sale. Despite some light staining from life's little incidents, the set is in great condition. The comfort of the furniture is particularly emphasized by the seller.\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nZane Bennett's background: \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: You are the buyer for this item, with a target price of $418.0. If you end up purchasing it for a price significantly higher than the target, you will be penalized. However, if you manage to acquire it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nZane Bennett's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hey Zane, I can see that you appreciate comfort as much as I do, based on your description of the set. Could you tell me more about the staining? Given the slight damage, I'm thinking a price drop might be fair, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Hi Giselle, sure thing. So the staining is minimal and does not diminish the comfort of the set at all. They are the results of everyday use, nothing excessive. However, I do understand your concern. While I mentioned the set for $550, I'd be willing to consider an offer. What price range were you considering?\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I completely understand, Zane. Daily life does leave its little marks. In light of these stains, though, I was thinking of something along the lines of $400. The set sounds comfortable, and that's really what I'm looking for. Does $400 sound alright to you?\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"I see where you're coming from, Giselle. Comfort is such a crucial aspect of a good furniture set, isn't it? And this set truly excels at that. How about meeting halfway? I would be comfortable settling at $450. It's slightly above what you suggested, but considering the furniture's excellent condition and unparalleled comfort, I believe it's a very fair price. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"You're right, Zane. Comfort is definitely important, and I'm sure this set is as comfortable as you emphasize. How about we compromise a bit more and settle at $430? It's a bit more than I initially planned, but considering your description and the condition of the furniture, I think it would be fair. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Zane Bennett said: \"Absolutely, Giselle, meeting in the middle strikes me as the fairest way to go about this. If the comfort and condition of the set suit your needs, then $430 seems like a fair compromise. It's a bit lower than I initially hoped for selling such a quality set, but the stains are a factor. If you're still interested, we can arrange for you to pick it up soon. Deal?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Perfect, Zane. I appreciate your flexibility and I'm excited about the comfort this set will offer. I'm in agreement with the $430. Let's arrange for the pickup. Deal!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is selling a couch, loveseat, chair, and ottoman set for $550.0, while another person is keen to purchase it. The set of furniture is described as being incredibly comfortable. The seller's wife wishes to upgrade to a new, stiffer couch, hence the sale. Despite some light staining from life's little incidents, the set is in great condition. The comfort of the furniture is particularly emphasized by the seller.\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nZane Bennett's background: \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: You are the buyer for this item, with a target price of $418.0. If you end up purchasing it for a price significantly higher than the target, you will be penalized. However, if you manage to acquire it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nZane Bennett's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hey Zane, I can see that you appreciate comfort as much as I do, based on your description of the set. Could you tell me more about the staining? Given the slight damage, I'm thinking a price drop might be fair, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Hi Giselle, sure thing. So the staining is minimal and does not diminish the comfort of the set at all. They are the results of everyday use, nothing excessive. However, I do understand your concern. While I mentioned the set for $550, I'd be willing to consider an offer. What price range were you considering?\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I completely understand, Zane. Daily life does leave its little marks. In light of these stains, though, I was thinking of something along the lines of $400. The set sounds comfortable, and that's really what I'm looking for. Does $400 sound alright to you?\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"I see where you're coming from, Giselle. Comfort is such a crucial aspect of a good furniture set, isn't it? And this set truly excels at that. How about meeting halfway? I would be comfortable settling at $450. It's slightly above what you suggested, but considering the furniture's excellent condition and unparalleled comfort, I believe it's a very fair price. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"You're right, Zane. Comfort is definitely important, and I'm sure this set is as comfortable as you emphasize. How about we compromise a bit more and settle at $430? It's a bit more than I initially planned, but considering your description and the condition of the furniture, I think it would be fair. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Zane Bennett said: \"Absolutely, Giselle, meeting in the middle strikes me as the fairest way to go about this. If the comfort and condition of the set suit your needs, then $430 seems like a fair compromise. It's a bit lower than I initially hoped for selling such a quality set, but the stains are a factor. If you're still interested, we can arrange for you to pick it up soon. Deal?\"\n\nTurn #6: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Perfect, Zane. I appreciate your flexibility and I'm excited about the comfort this set will offer. I'm in agreement with the $430. Let's arrange for the pickup. Deal!\"\n\nTurn #7: Zane Bennett said: \"Great, Giselle! I'm glad we could come to an agreement. I'm sure you will find the set incredibly comfortable. We can arrange for you to pick it up anytime that fits your schedule. Thanks for your understanding and flexibility. Deal sealed at $430 then. Looking forward to your pick up!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sounds good, Zane! Thank you for being so considerate and accommodating. I'll be in touch to arrange a pickup time that works well for both of us. Looking forward to my new comfortable set, thanks again!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is selling a couch, loveseat, chair, and ottoman set for $550.0, while another person is keen to purchase it. The set of furniture is described as being incredibly comfortable. The seller's wife wishes to upgrade to a new, stiffer couch, hence the sale. Despite some light staining from life's little incidents, the set is in great condition. The comfort of the furniture is particularly emphasized by the seller.\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nZane Bennett's background: \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: You are the buyer for this item, with a target price of $418.0. If you end up purchasing it for a price significantly higher than the target, you will be penalized. However, if you manage to acquire it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nZane Bennett's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hey Zane, I can see that you appreciate comfort as much as I do, based on your description of the set. Could you tell me more about the staining? Given the slight damage, I'm thinking a price drop might be fair, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Hi Giselle, sure thing. So the staining is minimal and does not diminish the comfort of the set at all. They are the results of everyday use, nothing excessive. However, I do understand your concern. While I mentioned the set for $550, I'd be willing to consider an offer. What price range were you considering?\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I completely understand, Zane. Daily life does leave its little marks. In light of these stains, though, I was thinking of something along the lines of $400. The set sounds comfortable, and that's really what I'm looking for. Does $400 sound alright to you?\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"I see where you're coming from, Giselle. Comfort is such a crucial aspect of a good furniture set, isn't it? And this set truly excels at that. How about meeting halfway? I would be comfortable settling at $450. It's slightly above what you suggested, but considering the furniture's excellent condition and unparalleled comfort, I believe it's a very fair price. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"You're right, Zane. Comfort is definitely important, and I'm sure this set is as comfortable as you emphasize. How about we compromise a bit more and settle at $430? It's a bit more than I initially planned, but considering your description and the condition of the furniture, I think it would be fair. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Zane Bennett said: \"Absolutely, Giselle, meeting in the middle strikes me as the fairest way to go about this. If the comfort and condition of the set suit your needs, then $430 seems like a fair compromise. It's a bit lower than I initially hoped for selling such a quality set, but the stains are a factor. If you're still interested, we can arrange for you to pick it up soon. Deal?\"\n\nTurn #6: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Perfect, Zane. I appreciate your flexibility and I'm excited about the comfort this set will offer. I'm in agreement with the $430. Let's arrange for the pickup. Deal!\"\n\nTurn #7: Zane Bennett said: \"Great, Giselle! I'm glad we could come to an agreement. I'm sure you will find the set incredibly comfortable. We can arrange for you to pick it up anytime that fits your schedule. Thanks for your understanding and flexibility. Deal sealed at $430 then. Looking forward to your pick up!\"\n\nTurn #8: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Sounds good, Zane! Thank you for being so considerate and accommodating. I'll be in touch to arrange a pickup time that works well for both of us. Looking forward to my new comfortable set, thanks again!\"\n\nTurn #9: Zane Bennett said: \"Thank you as well, Giselle. Feel free to connect anytime to arrange the pickup. I'm confident you're going to enjoy your new set! Have a great day.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'You too, Zane, thank you for this pleasant conversation. I will be in touch soon for the pickup arrangement. Have a wonderful day!'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is selling a couch, loveseat, chair, and ottoman set for $550.0, while another person is keen to purchase it. The set of furniture is described as being incredibly comfortable. The seller's wife wishes to upgrade to a new, stiffer couch, hence the sale. Despite some light staining from life's little incidents, the set is in great condition. The comfort of the furniture is particularly emphasized by the seller.\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nZane Bennett's background: \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: You are the buyer for this item, with a target price of $418.0. If you end up purchasing it for a price significantly higher than the target, you will be penalized. However, if you manage to acquire it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nZane Bennett's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hey Zane, I can see that you appreciate comfort as much as I do, based on your description of the set. Could you tell me more about the staining? Given the slight damage, I'm thinking a price drop might be fair, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Hi Giselle, sure thing. So the staining is minimal and does not diminish the comfort of the set at all. They are the results of everyday use, nothing excessive. However, I do understand your concern. While I mentioned the set for $550, I'd be willing to consider an offer. What price range were you considering?\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I completely understand, Zane. Daily life does leave its little marks. In light of these stains, though, I was thinking of something along the lines of $400. The set sounds comfortable, and that's really what I'm looking for. Does $400 sound alright to you?\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"I see where you're coming from, Giselle. Comfort is such a crucial aspect of a good furniture set, isn't it? And this set truly excels at that. How about meeting halfway? I would be comfortable settling at $450. It's slightly above what you suggested, but considering the furniture's excellent condition and unparalleled comfort, I believe it's a very fair price. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"You're right, Zane. Comfort is definitely important, and I'm sure this set is as comfortable as you emphasize. How about we compromise a bit more and settle at $430? It's a bit more than I initially planned, but considering your description and the condition of the furniture, I think it would be fair. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Zane Bennett said: \"Absolutely, Giselle, meeting in the middle strikes me as the fairest way to go about this. If the comfort and condition of the set suit your needs, then $430 seems like a fair compromise. It's a bit lower than I initially hoped for selling such a quality set, but the stains are a factor. If you're still interested, we can arrange for you to pick it up soon. Deal?\"\n\nTurn #6: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Perfect, Zane. I appreciate your flexibility and I'm excited about the comfort this set will offer. I'm in agreement with the $430. Let's arrange for the pickup. Deal!\"\n\nTurn #7: Zane Bennett said: \"Great, Giselle! I'm glad we could come to an agreement. I'm sure you will find the set incredibly comfortable. We can arrange for you to pick it up anytime that fits your schedule. Thanks for your understanding and flexibility. Deal sealed at $430 then. Looking forward to your pick up!\"\n\nTurn #8: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Sounds good, Zane! Thank you for being so considerate and accommodating. I'll be in touch to arrange a pickup time that works well for both of us. Looking forward to my new comfortable set, thanks again!\"\n\nTurn #9: Zane Bennett said: \"Thank you as well, Giselle. Feel free to connect anytime to arrange the pickup. I'm confident you're going to enjoy your new set! Have a great day.\"\n\nTurn #10: Giselle Rousseau said: \"You too, Zane, thank you for this pleasant conversation. I will be in touch soon for the pickup arrangement. Have a wonderful day!\"\n\nTurn #11: Zane Bennett left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Zane Bennett, your task is to act/speak as Zane Bennett would, keeping in mind Zane Bennett's social goal.\nYou can find Zane Bennett's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Zane Bennett's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Zane Bennett's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is selling a couch, loveseat, chair, and ottoman set for $550.0, while another person is keen to purchase it. The set of furniture is described as being incredibly comfortable. The seller's wife wishes to upgrade to a new, stiffer couch, hence the sale. Despite some light staining from life's little incidents, the set is in great condition. The comfort of the furniture is particularly emphasized by the seller.\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: \nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. Personality and values description: Zane Bennett is creative and outgoing, he values achievement and fairness. His decision-making is unique, often finding novel solutions to problems. Zane's secrets: He's secretly engaged to his best friend's ex.\nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Unknown\nZane Bennett's goal: As the seller for this item, your target price is set at $312.0. Please be aware that a penalty will be incurred if the item is sold for a price significantly below the target price. However, you will receive a bonus if you manage to sell it for more than the target price.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hey Zane, I can see that you appreciate comfort as much as I do, based on your description of the set. Could you tell me more about the staining? Given the slight damage, I'm thinking a price drop might be fair, don't you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hi Giselle, sure thing. So the staining is minimal and does not diminish the comfort of the set at all. They are the results of everyday use, nothing excessive. However, I do understand your concern. While I mentioned the set for $550, I'd be willing to consider an offer. What price range were you considering?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Zane Bennett, your task is to act/speak as Zane Bennett would, keeping in mind Zane Bennett's social goal.\nYou can find Zane Bennett's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Zane Bennett's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Zane Bennett's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is selling a couch, loveseat, chair, and ottoman set for $550.0, while another person is keen to purchase it. The set of furniture is described as being incredibly comfortable. The seller's wife wishes to upgrade to a new, stiffer couch, hence the sale. Despite some light staining from life's little incidents, the set is in great condition. The comfort of the furniture is particularly emphasized by the seller.\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: \nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. Personality and values description: Zane Bennett is creative and outgoing, he values achievement and fairness. His decision-making is unique, often finding novel solutions to problems. Zane's secrets: He's secretly engaged to his best friend's ex.\nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Unknown\nZane Bennett's goal: As the seller for this item, your target price is set at $312.0. Please be aware that a penalty will be incurred if the item is sold for a price significantly below the target price. However, you will receive a bonus if you manage to sell it for more than the target price.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hey Zane, I can see that you appreciate comfort as much as I do, based on your description of the set. Could you tell me more about the staining? Given the slight damage, I'm thinking a price drop might be fair, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Hi Giselle, sure thing. So the staining is minimal and does not diminish the comfort of the set at all. They are the results of everyday use, nothing excessive. However, I do understand your concern. While I mentioned the set for $550, I'd be willing to consider an offer. What price range were you considering?\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I completely understand, Zane. Daily life does leave its little marks. In light of these stains, though, I was thinking of something along the lines of $400. The set sounds comfortable, and that's really what I'm looking for. Does $400 sound alright to you?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I see where you're coming from, Giselle. Comfort is such a crucial aspect of a good furniture set, isn't it? And this set truly excels at that. How about meeting halfway? I would be comfortable settling at $450. It's slightly above what you suggested, but considering the furniture's excellent condition and unparalleled comfort, I believe it's a very fair price. What do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Zane Bennett, your task is to act/speak as Zane Bennett would, keeping in mind Zane Bennett's social goal.\nYou can find Zane Bennett's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Zane Bennett's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Zane Bennett's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is selling a couch, loveseat, chair, and ottoman set for $550.0, while another person is keen to purchase it. The set of furniture is described as being incredibly comfortable. The seller's wife wishes to upgrade to a new, stiffer couch, hence the sale. Despite some light staining from life's little incidents, the set is in great condition. The comfort of the furniture is particularly emphasized by the seller.\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: \nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. Personality and values description: Zane Bennett is creative and outgoing, he values achievement and fairness. His decision-making is unique, often finding novel solutions to problems. Zane's secrets: He's secretly engaged to his best friend's ex.\nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Unknown\nZane Bennett's goal: As the seller for this item, your target price is set at $312.0. Please be aware that a penalty will be incurred if the item is sold for a price significantly below the target price. However, you will receive a bonus if you manage to sell it for more than the target price.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hey Zane, I can see that you appreciate comfort as much as I do, based on your description of the set. Could you tell me more about the staining? Given the slight damage, I'm thinking a price drop might be fair, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Hi Giselle, sure thing. So the staining is minimal and does not diminish the comfort of the set at all. They are the results of everyday use, nothing excessive. However, I do understand your concern. While I mentioned the set for $550, I'd be willing to consider an offer. What price range were you considering?\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I completely understand, Zane. Daily life does leave its little marks. In light of these stains, though, I was thinking of something along the lines of $400. The set sounds comfortable, and that's really what I'm looking for. Does $400 sound alright to you?\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"I see where you're coming from, Giselle. Comfort is such a crucial aspect of a good furniture set, isn't it? And this set truly excels at that. How about meeting halfway? I would be comfortable settling at $450. It's slightly above what you suggested, but considering the furniture's excellent condition and unparalleled comfort, I believe it's a very fair price. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"You're right, Zane. Comfort is definitely important, and I'm sure this set is as comfortable as you emphasize. How about we compromise a bit more and settle at $430? It's a bit more than I initially planned, but considering your description and the condition of the furniture, I think it would be fair. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Giselle, meeting in the middle strikes me as the fairest way to go about this. If the comfort and condition of the set suit your needs, then $430 seems like a fair compromise. It's a bit lower than I initially hoped for selling such a quality set, but the stains are a factor. If you're still interested, we can arrange for you to pick it up soon. Deal?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Zane Bennett, your task is to act/speak as Zane Bennett would, keeping in mind Zane Bennett's social goal.\nYou can find Zane Bennett's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Zane Bennett's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Zane Bennett's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is selling a couch, loveseat, chair, and ottoman set for $550.0, while another person is keen to purchase it. The set of furniture is described as being incredibly comfortable. The seller's wife wishes to upgrade to a new, stiffer couch, hence the sale. Despite some light staining from life's little incidents, the set is in great condition. The comfort of the furniture is particularly emphasized by the seller.\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: \nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. Personality and values description: Zane Bennett is creative and outgoing, he values achievement and fairness. His decision-making is unique, often finding novel solutions to problems. Zane's secrets: He's secretly engaged to his best friend's ex.\nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Unknown\nZane Bennett's goal: As the seller for this item, your target price is set at $312.0. Please be aware that a penalty will be incurred if the item is sold for a price significantly below the target price. However, you will receive a bonus if you manage to sell it for more than the target price.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hey Zane, I can see that you appreciate comfort as much as I do, based on your description of the set. Could you tell me more about the staining? Given the slight damage, I'm thinking a price drop might be fair, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Hi Giselle, sure thing. So the staining is minimal and does not diminish the comfort of the set at all. They are the results of everyday use, nothing excessive. However, I do understand your concern. While I mentioned the set for $550, I'd be willing to consider an offer. What price range were you considering?\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I completely understand, Zane. Daily life does leave its little marks. In light of these stains, though, I was thinking of something along the lines of $400. The set sounds comfortable, and that's really what I'm looking for. Does $400 sound alright to you?\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"I see where you're coming from, Giselle. Comfort is such a crucial aspect of a good furniture set, isn't it? And this set truly excels at that. How about meeting halfway? I would be comfortable settling at $450. It's slightly above what you suggested, but considering the furniture's excellent condition and unparalleled comfort, I believe it's a very fair price. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"You're right, Zane. Comfort is definitely important, and I'm sure this set is as comfortable as you emphasize. How about we compromise a bit more and settle at $430? It's a bit more than I initially planned, but considering your description and the condition of the furniture, I think it would be fair. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Zane Bennett said: \"Absolutely, Giselle, meeting in the middle strikes me as the fairest way to go about this. If the comfort and condition of the set suit your needs, then $430 seems like a fair compromise. It's a bit lower than I initially hoped for selling such a quality set, but the stains are a factor. If you're still interested, we can arrange for you to pick it up soon. Deal?\"\n\nTurn #6: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Perfect, Zane. I appreciate your flexibility and I'm excited about the comfort this set will offer. I'm in agreement with the $430. Let's arrange for the pickup. Deal!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Great, Giselle! I'm glad we could come to an agreement. I'm sure you will find the set incredibly comfortable. We can arrange for you to pick it up anytime that fits your schedule. Thanks for your understanding and flexibility. Deal sealed at $430 then. Looking forward to your pick up!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Zane Bennett, your task is to act/speak as Zane Bennett would, keeping in mind Zane Bennett's social goal.\nYou can find Zane Bennett's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Zane Bennett's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Zane Bennett's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is selling a couch, loveseat, chair, and ottoman set for $550.0, while another person is keen to purchase it. The set of furniture is described as being incredibly comfortable. The seller's wife wishes to upgrade to a new, stiffer couch, hence the sale. Despite some light staining from life's little incidents, the set is in great condition. The comfort of the furniture is particularly emphasized by the seller.\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: \nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. Personality and values description: Zane Bennett is creative and outgoing, he values achievement and fairness. His decision-making is unique, often finding novel solutions to problems. Zane's secrets: He's secretly engaged to his best friend's ex.\nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Unknown\nZane Bennett's goal: As the seller for this item, your target price is set at $312.0. Please be aware that a penalty will be incurred if the item is sold for a price significantly below the target price. However, you will receive a bonus if you manage to sell it for more than the target price.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hey Zane, I can see that you appreciate comfort as much as I do, based on your description of the set. Could you tell me more about the staining? Given the slight damage, I'm thinking a price drop might be fair, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Hi Giselle, sure thing. So the staining is minimal and does not diminish the comfort of the set at all. They are the results of everyday use, nothing excessive. However, I do understand your concern. While I mentioned the set for $550, I'd be willing to consider an offer. What price range were you considering?\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I completely understand, Zane. Daily life does leave its little marks. In light of these stains, though, I was thinking of something along the lines of $400. The set sounds comfortable, and that's really what I'm looking for. Does $400 sound alright to you?\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"I see where you're coming from, Giselle. Comfort is such a crucial aspect of a good furniture set, isn't it? And this set truly excels at that. How about meeting halfway? I would be comfortable settling at $450. It's slightly above what you suggested, but considering the furniture's excellent condition and unparalleled comfort, I believe it's a very fair price. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"You're right, Zane. Comfort is definitely important, and I'm sure this set is as comfortable as you emphasize. How about we compromise a bit more and settle at $430? It's a bit more than I initially planned, but considering your description and the condition of the furniture, I think it would be fair. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Zane Bennett said: \"Absolutely, Giselle, meeting in the middle strikes me as the fairest way to go about this. If the comfort and condition of the set suit your needs, then $430 seems like a fair compromise. It's a bit lower than I initially hoped for selling such a quality set, but the stains are a factor. If you're still interested, we can arrange for you to pick it up soon. Deal?\"\n\nTurn #6: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Perfect, Zane. I appreciate your flexibility and I'm excited about the comfort this set will offer. I'm in agreement with the $430. Let's arrange for the pickup. Deal!\"\n\nTurn #7: Zane Bennett said: \"Great, Giselle! I'm glad we could come to an agreement. I'm sure you will find the set incredibly comfortable. We can arrange for you to pick it up anytime that fits your schedule. Thanks for your understanding and flexibility. Deal sealed at $430 then. Looking forward to your pick up!\"\n\nTurn #8: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Sounds good, Zane! Thank you for being so considerate and accommodating. I'll be in touch to arrange a pickup time that works well for both of us. Looking forward to my new comfortable set, thanks again!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you as well, Giselle. Feel free to connect anytime to arrange the pickup. I'm confident you're going to enjoy your new set! Have a great day.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nEsmeralda Solis's background: \nMiles Hawkins's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDavid: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Christian Moerlein Brewing Company Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nLarry: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nLynn: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Cray Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nDonald: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Advance Auto Parts Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nDennis: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nJane: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Planet Hollywood Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nHarvey: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: Sony Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nNinfa: Hobby: Quilting Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nAngelica: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Planet Hollywood Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \n\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hello there, Esmeralda. I couldn't help but overhear that you enjoy homebrewing. Is that right?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Zane Bennett, your task is to act/speak as Zane Bennett would, keeping in mind Zane Bennett's social goal.\nYou can find Zane Bennett's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Zane Bennett's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Zane Bennett's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is selling a couch, loveseat, chair, and ottoman set for $550.0, while another person is keen to purchase it. The set of furniture is described as being incredibly comfortable. The seller's wife wishes to upgrade to a new, stiffer couch, hence the sale. Despite some light staining from life's little incidents, the set is in great condition. The comfort of the furniture is particularly emphasized by the seller.\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: \nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. Personality and values description: Zane Bennett is creative and outgoing, he values achievement and fairness. His decision-making is unique, often finding novel solutions to problems. Zane's secrets: He's secretly engaged to his best friend's ex.\nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Unknown\nZane Bennett's goal: As the seller for this item, your target price is set at $312.0. Please be aware that a penalty will be incurred if the item is sold for a price significantly below the target price. However, you will receive a bonus if you manage to sell it for more than the target price.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hey Zane, I can see that you appreciate comfort as much as I do, based on your description of the set. Could you tell me more about the staining? Given the slight damage, I'm thinking a price drop might be fair, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Hi Giselle, sure thing. So the staining is minimal and does not diminish the comfort of the set at all. They are the results of everyday use, nothing excessive. However, I do understand your concern. While I mentioned the set for $550, I'd be willing to consider an offer. What price range were you considering?\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I completely understand, Zane. Daily life does leave its little marks. In light of these stains, though, I was thinking of something along the lines of $400. The set sounds comfortable, and that's really what I'm looking for. Does $400 sound alright to you?\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"I see where you're coming from, Giselle. Comfort is such a crucial aspect of a good furniture set, isn't it? And this set truly excels at that. How about meeting halfway? I would be comfortable settling at $450. It's slightly above what you suggested, but considering the furniture's excellent condition and unparalleled comfort, I believe it's a very fair price. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"You're right, Zane. Comfort is definitely important, and I'm sure this set is as comfortable as you emphasize. How about we compromise a bit more and settle at $430? It's a bit more than I initially planned, but considering your description and the condition of the furniture, I think it would be fair. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Zane Bennett said: \"Absolutely, Giselle, meeting in the middle strikes me as the fairest way to go about this. If the comfort and condition of the set suit your needs, then $430 seems like a fair compromise. It's a bit lower than I initially hoped for selling such a quality set, but the stains are a factor. If you're still interested, we can arrange for you to pick it up soon. Deal?\"\n\nTurn #6: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Perfect, Zane. I appreciate your flexibility and I'm excited about the comfort this set will offer. I'm in agreement with the $430. Let's arrange for the pickup. Deal!\"\n\nTurn #7: Zane Bennett said: \"Great, Giselle! I'm glad we could come to an agreement. I'm sure you will find the set incredibly comfortable. We can arrange for you to pick it up anytime that fits your schedule. Thanks for your understanding and flexibility. Deal sealed at $430 then. Looking forward to your pick up!\"\n\nTurn #8: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Sounds good, Zane! Thank you for being so considerate and accommodating. I'll be in touch to arrange a pickup time that works well for both of us. Looking forward to my new comfortable set, thanks again!\"\n\nTurn #9: Zane Bennett said: \"Thank you as well, Giselle. Feel free to connect anytime to arrange the pickup. I'm confident you're going to enjoy your new set! Have a great day.\"\n\nTurn #10: Giselle Rousseau said: \"You too, Zane, thank you for this pleasant conversation. I will be in touch soon for the pickup arrangement. Have a wonderful day!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nEsmeralda Solis's background: \nMiles Hawkins's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDavid: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Christian Moerlein Brewing Company Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nLarry: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nLynn: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Cray Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nDonald: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Advance Auto Parts Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nDennis: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nJane: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Planet Hollywood Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nHarvey: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: Sony Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nNinfa: Hobby: Quilting Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nAngelica: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Planet Hollywood Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \n\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hello there, Esmeralda. I couldn't help but overhear that you enjoy homebrewing. Is that right?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Oh, well, homebrewing isn't quite my cup of tea Miles. However, could you help me remember? I believe we might have a mutual friend who is also passionate about it. Does the name Harvey ring a bell? He loves amateur radio, and works at Sony, if that helps jog your memory.\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Oh, sure I know Harvey! Quite the interesting character, isn't he? He makes my passion for gardening seems rather mainstream in comparison. Speaking of gardening, I've got this friend, David, who is into homebrewing. He works at the Christian Moerlein Brewing Company. Do you happen to know him?\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"David from Christian Moerlein Brewing Company? Can't say I'm familiar with him. And speaking of creativity and uniqueness, I have a friend named Marie who's greatly involved in acting. She works at Southern New England Telephone and prefers spending her afternoons outdoors. Perhaps you've crossed paths with her as well?\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"Marie at Southern New England Telephone? Sorry, I can't say I've met her. However, speaking of the outdoors, I know a few people who also love the open air. For instance, there's Ninfa, she likes quilting and works at The J.M. Smucker Company, she's an early bird and prefers mornings. Does that ring any bells?\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Ninfa from The J.M. Smucker Company doesn't sound familiar, I'm afraid. And speaking of outdoor enthusiasts, have you ever come across a charming individual named Blake? He also has a knack for dancing and is associated with The J.M. Smucker Company. He mostly spends his evenings out in the open. How about him?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Blake from The J.M. Smucker Company, you say? I can't recall meeting a Blake, apologies. However, dancing outdoors in the evenings sounds very similar to another friend I know named Angelica. She's a homebrewer and works at Planet Hollywood. Have you possibly crossed paths with her?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nEsmeralda Solis's background: \nMiles Hawkins's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDavid: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Christian Moerlein Brewing Company Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nLarry: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nLynn: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Cray Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nDonald: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Advance Auto Parts Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nDennis: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nJane: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Planet Hollywood Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nHarvey: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: Sony Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nNinfa: Hobby: Quilting Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nAngelica: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Planet Hollywood Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \n\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hello there, Esmeralda. I couldn't help but overhear that you enjoy homebrewing. Is that right?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Oh, well, homebrewing isn't quite my cup of tea Miles. However, could you help me remember? I believe we might have a mutual friend who is also passionate about it. Does the name Harvey ring a bell? He loves amateur radio, and works at Sony, if that helps jog your memory.\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Oh, sure I know Harvey! Quite the interesting character, isn't he? He makes my passion for gardening seems rather mainstream in comparison. Speaking of gardening, I've got this friend, David, who is into homebrewing. He works at the Christian Moerlein Brewing Company. Do you happen to know him?\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"David from Christian Moerlein Brewing Company? Can't say I'm familiar with him. And speaking of creativity and uniqueness, I have a friend named Marie who's greatly involved in acting. She works at Southern New England Telephone and prefers spending her afternoons outdoors. Perhaps you've crossed paths with her as well?\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"Marie at Southern New England Telephone? Sorry, I can't say I've met her. However, speaking of the outdoors, I know a few people who also love the open air. For instance, there's Ninfa, she likes quilting and works at The J.M. Smucker Company, she's an early bird and prefers mornings. Does that ring any bells?\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Ninfa from The J.M. Smucker Company doesn't sound familiar, I'm afraid. And speaking of outdoor enthusiasts, have you ever come across a charming individual named Blake? He also has a knack for dancing and is associated with The J.M. Smucker Company. He mostly spends his evenings out in the open. How about him?\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins said: \"Blake from The J.M. Smucker Company, you say? I can't recall meeting a Blake, apologies. However, dancing outdoors in the evenings sounds very similar to another friend I know named Angelica. She's a homebrewer and works at Planet Hollywood. Have you possibly crossed paths with her?\"\n\nTurn #7: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Angelica from Planet Hollywood, doesn't sound familiar to me, I'm sorry. It seems like we have connections in similar circles though. Let me mention Louise, she loves dancing in the evening like Angelica and works at Cray. Maybe you know her?\"\n\nTurn #8: Miles Hawkins said: \"Louise who works at Cray? Does she happen to homebrew as well? Because I do know a Lynn who works at Cray, enjoys homebrewing, and is quite fond of spending her evenings outdoors. Does that description match your friend?\"\n\nTurn #9: Esmeralda Solis said: \"No, it seems there might be some confusion, Lynn isn't the one I meant. Louise does share the love for dancing and spending evenings outdoors, but she's not into homebrewing, I'm afraid. I appreciate your time, Miles. It's rather fascinating how interconnected our worlds are, isn't it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Esmeralda! It's pretty remarkable, isn't it? I find it fascinating how hobbies and interests can intersect and weave together our social networks. It's clear we indeed swim in similar circles. Great speaking with you today.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nEsmeralda Solis's background: \nMiles Hawkins's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDavid: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Christian Moerlein Brewing Company Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nLarry: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nLynn: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Cray Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nDonald: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Advance Auto Parts Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nDennis: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nJane: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Planet Hollywood Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nHarvey: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: Sony Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nNinfa: Hobby: Quilting Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nAngelica: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Planet Hollywood Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \n\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hello there, Esmeralda. I couldn't help but overhear that you enjoy homebrewing. Is that right?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Oh, well, homebrewing isn't quite my cup of tea Miles. However, could you help me remember? I believe we might have a mutual friend who is also passionate about it. Does the name Harvey ring a bell? He loves amateur radio, and works at Sony, if that helps jog your memory.\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Oh, sure I know Harvey! Quite the interesting character, isn't he? He makes my passion for gardening seems rather mainstream in comparison. Speaking of gardening, I've got this friend, David, who is into homebrewing. He works at the Christian Moerlein Brewing Company. Do you happen to know him?\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"David from Christian Moerlein Brewing Company? Can't say I'm familiar with him. And speaking of creativity and uniqueness, I have a friend named Marie who's greatly involved in acting. She works at Southern New England Telephone and prefers spending her afternoons outdoors. Perhaps you've crossed paths with her as well?\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"Marie at Southern New England Telephone? Sorry, I can't say I've met her. However, speaking of the outdoors, I know a few people who also love the open air. For instance, there's Ninfa, she likes quilting and works at The J.M. Smucker Company, she's an early bird and prefers mornings. Does that ring any bells?\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Ninfa from The J.M. Smucker Company doesn't sound familiar, I'm afraid. And speaking of outdoor enthusiasts, have you ever come across a charming individual named Blake? He also has a knack for dancing and is associated with The J.M. Smucker Company. He mostly spends his evenings out in the open. How about him?\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins said: \"Blake from The J.M. Smucker Company, you say? I can't recall meeting a Blake, apologies. However, dancing outdoors in the evenings sounds very similar to another friend I know named Angelica. She's a homebrewer and works at Planet Hollywood. Have you possibly crossed paths with her?\"\n\nTurn #7: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Angelica from Planet Hollywood, doesn't sound familiar to me, I'm sorry. It seems like we have connections in similar circles though. Let me mention Louise, she loves dancing in the evening like Angelica and works at Cray. Maybe you know her?\"\n\nTurn #8: Miles Hawkins said: \"Louise who works at Cray? Does she happen to homebrew as well? Because I do know a Lynn who works at Cray, enjoys homebrewing, and is quite fond of spending her evenings outdoors. Does that description match your friend?\"\n\nTurn #9: Esmeralda Solis said: \"No, it seems there might be some confusion, Lynn isn't the one I meant. Louise does share the love for dancing and spending evenings outdoors, but she's not into homebrewing, I'm afraid. I appreciate your time, Miles. It's rather fascinating how interconnected our worlds are, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #10: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Esmeralda! It's pretty remarkable, isn't it? I find it fascinating how hobbies and interests can intersect and weave together our social networks. It's clear we indeed swim in similar circles. Great speaking with you today.\"\n\nTurn #11: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Indeed, Miles. Our hobbies and interests serve as a unique fabric connecting us with so many different people. It was a pleasure speaking with you today. I hope we can continue this conversation in the future, maybe even finding our mutual acquaintances. Have a wonderful evening!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, the more we speak, the smaller the world seems to become, doesn't it? I'm looking forward to getting to know more about our shared connections, Esmeralda. Have a fantastic evening as well!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nEsmeralda Solis's background: \nMiles Hawkins's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDavid: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Christian Moerlein Brewing Company Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nLarry: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nLynn: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Cray Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nDonald: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Advance Auto Parts Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nDennis: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nJane: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Planet Hollywood Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nHarvey: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: Sony Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nNinfa: Hobby: Quilting Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nAngelica: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Planet Hollywood Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \n\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hello there, Esmeralda. I couldn't help but overhear that you enjoy homebrewing. Is that right?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Oh, well, homebrewing isn't quite my cup of tea Miles. However, could you help me remember? I believe we might have a mutual friend who is also passionate about it. Does the name Harvey ring a bell? He loves amateur radio, and works at Sony, if that helps jog your memory.\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Oh, sure I know Harvey! Quite the interesting character, isn't he? He makes my passion for gardening seems rather mainstream in comparison. Speaking of gardening, I've got this friend, David, who is into homebrewing. He works at the Christian Moerlein Brewing Company. Do you happen to know him?\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"David from Christian Moerlein Brewing Company? Can't say I'm familiar with him. And speaking of creativity and uniqueness, I have a friend named Marie who's greatly involved in acting. She works at Southern New England Telephone and prefers spending her afternoons outdoors. Perhaps you've crossed paths with her as well?\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"Marie at Southern New England Telephone? Sorry, I can't say I've met her. However, speaking of the outdoors, I know a few people who also love the open air. For instance, there's Ninfa, she likes quilting and works at The J.M. Smucker Company, she's an early bird and prefers mornings. Does that ring any bells?\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Ninfa from The J.M. Smucker Company doesn't sound familiar, I'm afraid. And speaking of outdoor enthusiasts, have you ever come across a charming individual named Blake? He also has a knack for dancing and is associated with The J.M. Smucker Company. He mostly spends his evenings out in the open. How about him?\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins said: \"Blake from The J.M. Smucker Company, you say? I can't recall meeting a Blake, apologies. However, dancing outdoors in the evenings sounds very similar to another friend I know named Angelica. She's a homebrewer and works at Planet Hollywood. Have you possibly crossed paths with her?\"\n\nTurn #7: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Angelica from Planet Hollywood, doesn't sound familiar to me, I'm sorry. It seems like we have connections in similar circles though. Let me mention Louise, she loves dancing in the evening like Angelica and works at Cray. Maybe you know her?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Louise who works at Cray? Does she happen to homebrew as well? Because I do know a Lynn who works at Cray, enjoys homebrewing, and is quite fond of spending her evenings outdoors. Does that description match your friend?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nEsmeralda Solis's background: \nMiles Hawkins's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDavid: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Christian Moerlein Brewing Company Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nLarry: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nLynn: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Cray Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nDonald: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Advance Auto Parts Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nDennis: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nJane: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Planet Hollywood Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nHarvey: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: Sony Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nNinfa: Hobby: Quilting Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nAngelica: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Planet Hollywood Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \n\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hello there, Esmeralda. I couldn't help but overhear that you enjoy homebrewing. Is that right?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Oh, well, homebrewing isn't quite my cup of tea Miles. However, could you help me remember? I believe we might have a mutual friend who is also passionate about it. Does the name Harvey ring a bell? He loves amateur radio, and works at Sony, if that helps jog your memory.\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Oh, sure I know Harvey! Quite the interesting character, isn't he? He makes my passion for gardening seems rather mainstream in comparison. Speaking of gardening, I've got this friend, David, who is into homebrewing. He works at the Christian Moerlein Brewing Company. Do you happen to know him?\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"David from Christian Moerlein Brewing Company? Can't say I'm familiar with him. And speaking of creativity and uniqueness, I have a friend named Marie who's greatly involved in acting. She works at Southern New England Telephone and prefers spending her afternoons outdoors. Perhaps you've crossed paths with her as well?\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"Marie at Southern New England Telephone? Sorry, I can't say I've met her. However, speaking of the outdoors, I know a few people who also love the open air. For instance, there's Ninfa, she likes quilting and works at The J.M. Smucker Company, she's an early bird and prefers mornings. Does that ring any bells?\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Ninfa from The J.M. Smucker Company doesn't sound familiar, I'm afraid. And speaking of outdoor enthusiasts, have you ever come across a charming individual named Blake? He also has a knack for dancing and is associated with The J.M. Smucker Company. He mostly spends his evenings out in the open. How about him?\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins said: \"Blake from The J.M. Smucker Company, you say? I can't recall meeting a Blake, apologies. However, dancing outdoors in the evenings sounds very similar to another friend I know named Angelica. She's a homebrewer and works at Planet Hollywood. Have you possibly crossed paths with her?\"\n\nTurn #7: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Angelica from Planet Hollywood, doesn't sound familiar to me, I'm sorry. It seems like we have connections in similar circles though. Let me mention Louise, she loves dancing in the evening like Angelica and works at Cray. Maybe you know her?\"\n\nTurn #8: Miles Hawkins said: \"Louise who works at Cray? Does she happen to homebrew as well? Because I do know a Lynn who works at Cray, enjoys homebrewing, and is quite fond of spending her evenings outdoors. Does that description match your friend?\"\n\nTurn #9: Esmeralda Solis said: \"No, it seems there might be some confusion, Lynn isn't the one I meant. Louise does share the love for dancing and spending evenings outdoors, but she's not into homebrewing, I'm afraid. I appreciate your time, Miles. It's rather fascinating how interconnected our worlds are, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #10: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Esmeralda! It's pretty remarkable, isn't it? I find it fascinating how hobbies and interests can intersect and weave together our social networks. It's clear we indeed swim in similar circles. Great speaking with you today.\"\n\nTurn #11: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Indeed, Miles. Our hobbies and interests serve as a unique fabric connecting us with so many different people. It was a pleasure speaking with you today. I hope we can continue this conversation in the future, maybe even finding our mutual acquaintances. Have a wonderful evening!\"\n\nTurn #12: Miles Hawkins said: \"Indeed, the more we speak, the smaller the world seems to become, doesn't it? I'm looking forward to getting to know more about our shared connections, Esmeralda. Have a fantastic evening as well!\"\n\nTurn #13: Esmeralda Solis left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMarie: Hobby: Acting Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nHarvey: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: Sony Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nFrank: Hobby: Deltiology Company: Ebonite International Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nVera: Hobby: Watching movies Company: Gentiva Health Services Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nLawrence: Hobby: Kayaking Company: Ebonite International Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nLouise: Hobby: Dancing Company: Cray Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nDallas: Hobby: Dancing Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nNancy: Hobby: Dancing Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nBlake: Hobby: Dancing Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hello there, Esmeralda. I couldn't help but overhear that you enjoy homebrewing. Is that right?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oh, well, homebrewing isn't quite my cup of tea Miles. However, could you help me remember? I believe we might have a mutual friend who is also passionate about it. Does the name Harvey ring a bell? He loves amateur radio, and works at Sony, if that helps jog your memory.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMarie: Hobby: Acting Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nHarvey: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: Sony Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nFrank: Hobby: Deltiology Company: Ebonite International Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nVera: Hobby: Watching movies Company: Gentiva Health Services Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nLawrence: Hobby: Kayaking Company: Ebonite International Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nLouise: Hobby: Dancing Company: Cray Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nDallas: Hobby: Dancing Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nNancy: Hobby: Dancing Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nBlake: Hobby: Dancing Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hello there, Esmeralda. I couldn't help but overhear that you enjoy homebrewing. Is that right?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Oh, well, homebrewing isn't quite my cup of tea Miles. However, could you help me remember? I believe we might have a mutual friend who is also passionate about it. Does the name Harvey ring a bell? He loves amateur radio, and works at Sony, if that helps jog your memory.\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Oh, sure I know Harvey! Quite the interesting character, isn't he? He makes my passion for gardening seems rather mainstream in comparison. Speaking of gardening, I've got this friend, David, who is into homebrewing. He works at the Christian Moerlein Brewing Company. Do you happen to know him?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"David from Christian Moerlein Brewing Company? Can't say I'm familiar with him. And speaking of creativity and uniqueness, I have a friend named Marie who's greatly involved in acting. She works at Southern New England Telephone and prefers spending her afternoons outdoors. Perhaps you've crossed paths with her as well?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMarie: Hobby: Acting Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nHarvey: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: Sony Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nFrank: Hobby: Deltiology Company: Ebonite International Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nVera: Hobby: Watching movies Company: Gentiva Health Services Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nLawrence: Hobby: Kayaking Company: Ebonite International Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nLouise: Hobby: Dancing Company: Cray Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nDallas: Hobby: Dancing Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nNancy: Hobby: Dancing Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nBlake: Hobby: Dancing Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hello there, Esmeralda. I couldn't help but overhear that you enjoy homebrewing. Is that right?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Oh, well, homebrewing isn't quite my cup of tea Miles. However, could you help me remember? I believe we might have a mutual friend who is also passionate about it. Does the name Harvey ring a bell? He loves amateur radio, and works at Sony, if that helps jog your memory.\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Oh, sure I know Harvey! Quite the interesting character, isn't he? He makes my passion for gardening seems rather mainstream in comparison. Speaking of gardening, I've got this friend, David, who is into homebrewing. He works at the Christian Moerlein Brewing Company. Do you happen to know him?\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"David from Christian Moerlein Brewing Company? Can't say I'm familiar with him. And speaking of creativity and uniqueness, I have a friend named Marie who's greatly involved in acting. She works at Southern New England Telephone and prefers spending her afternoons outdoors. Perhaps you've crossed paths with her as well?\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"Marie at Southern New England Telephone? Sorry, I can't say I've met her. However, speaking of the outdoors, I know a few people who also love the open air. For instance, there's Ninfa, she likes quilting and works at The J.M. Smucker Company, she's an early bird and prefers mornings. Does that ring any bells?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ninfa from The J.M. Smucker Company doesn't sound familiar, I'm afraid. And speaking of outdoor enthusiasts, have you ever come across a charming individual named Blake? He also has a knack for dancing and is associated with The J.M. Smucker Company. He mostly spends his evenings out in the open. How about him?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Lena Goodwin\nLily Greenberg's background: \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nJacob: Hobby: Card collecting School: Whittier College \nMarjorie: Hobby: Foraging School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nCarrie: Hobby: Geocaching School: Tennessee State University \nLouis: Hobby: Shopping School: Hesston College \nMicheline: Hobby: Shopping School: University of Hartford \nEva: Hobby: Geocaching School: Hesston College \nJohnnie: Hobby: Blacksmithing School: University of Akron \nJohn: Hobby: Foraging School: University of California, Davis \nRonald: Hobby: Weightlifting School: Indiana University at South Bend \nCynthia: Hobby: Lacrosse School: Kansas State University \nRobert: Hobby: Water sports School: University of Akron\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello! I'm Lily, a lawyer. Lovely party, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hi Lily, nice to meet you. I'm Lena, an architect. This party is quite enjoyable. By the way, you don't happen to be into hobbies like geocaching or foraging, do you? They seem to be quite popular among my friends.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"I can't say I've had much experience with geocaching or foraging as hobbies, but one of my friends, Melaine, is quite into geocaching. She attended the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. Do you happen to know her?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oh, I don't think I know Melanie but it seems we have a mutual friend who's also into geocaching and attended the same school, her name is Marjorie. Small world!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMarie: Hobby: Acting Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nHarvey: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: Sony Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nFrank: Hobby: Deltiology Company: Ebonite International Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nVera: Hobby: Watching movies Company: Gentiva Health Services Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nLawrence: Hobby: Kayaking Company: Ebonite International Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nLouise: Hobby: Dancing Company: Cray Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nDallas: Hobby: Dancing Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nNancy: Hobby: Dancing Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nBlake: Hobby: Dancing Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hello there, Esmeralda. I couldn't help but overhear that you enjoy homebrewing. Is that right?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Oh, well, homebrewing isn't quite my cup of tea Miles. However, could you help me remember? I believe we might have a mutual friend who is also passionate about it. Does the name Harvey ring a bell? He loves amateur radio, and works at Sony, if that helps jog your memory.\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Oh, sure I know Harvey! Quite the interesting character, isn't he? He makes my passion for gardening seems rather mainstream in comparison. Speaking of gardening, I've got this friend, David, who is into homebrewing. He works at the Christian Moerlein Brewing Company. Do you happen to know him?\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"David from Christian Moerlein Brewing Company? Can't say I'm familiar with him. And speaking of creativity and uniqueness, I have a friend named Marie who's greatly involved in acting. She works at Southern New England Telephone and prefers spending her afternoons outdoors. Perhaps you've crossed paths with her as well?\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"Marie at Southern New England Telephone? Sorry, I can't say I've met her. However, speaking of the outdoors, I know a few people who also love the open air. For instance, there's Ninfa, she likes quilting and works at The J.M. Smucker Company, she's an early bird and prefers mornings. Does that ring any bells?\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Ninfa from The J.M. Smucker Company doesn't sound familiar, I'm afraid. And speaking of outdoor enthusiasts, have you ever come across a charming individual named Blake? He also has a knack for dancing and is associated with The J.M. Smucker Company. He mostly spends his evenings out in the open. How about him?\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins said: \"Blake from The J.M. Smucker Company, you say? I can't recall meeting a Blake, apologies. However, dancing outdoors in the evenings sounds very similar to another friend I know named Angelica. She's a homebrewer and works at Planet Hollywood. Have you possibly crossed paths with her?\"\n\nTurn #7: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Angelica from Planet Hollywood, doesn't sound familiar to me, I'm sorry. It seems like we have connections in similar circles though. Let me mention Louise, she loves dancing in the evening like Angelica and works at Cray. Maybe you know her?\"\n\nTurn #8: Miles Hawkins said: \"Louise who works at Cray? Does she happen to homebrew as well? Because I do know a Lynn who works at Cray, enjoys homebrewing, and is quite fond of spending her evenings outdoors. Does that description match your friend?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"No, it seems there might be some confusion, Lynn isn't the one I meant. Louise does share the love for dancing and spending evenings outdoors, but she's not into homebrewing, I'm afraid. I appreciate your time, Miles. It's rather fascinating how interconnected our worlds are, isn't it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMarie: Hobby: Acting Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nHarvey: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: Sony Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nFrank: Hobby: Deltiology Company: Ebonite International Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nVera: Hobby: Watching movies Company: Gentiva Health Services Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nLawrence: Hobby: Kayaking Company: Ebonite International Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nLouise: Hobby: Dancing Company: Cray Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nDallas: Hobby: Dancing Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nNancy: Hobby: Dancing Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nBlake: Hobby: Dancing Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hello there, Esmeralda. I couldn't help but overhear that you enjoy homebrewing. Is that right?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Oh, well, homebrewing isn't quite my cup of tea Miles. However, could you help me remember? I believe we might have a mutual friend who is also passionate about it. Does the name Harvey ring a bell? He loves amateur radio, and works at Sony, if that helps jog your memory.\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Oh, sure I know Harvey! Quite the interesting character, isn't he? He makes my passion for gardening seems rather mainstream in comparison. Speaking of gardening, I've got this friend, David, who is into homebrewing. He works at the Christian Moerlein Brewing Company. Do you happen to know him?\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"David from Christian Moerlein Brewing Company? Can't say I'm familiar with him. And speaking of creativity and uniqueness, I have a friend named Marie who's greatly involved in acting. She works at Southern New England Telephone and prefers spending her afternoons outdoors. Perhaps you've crossed paths with her as well?\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"Marie at Southern New England Telephone? Sorry, I can't say I've met her. However, speaking of the outdoors, I know a few people who also love the open air. For instance, there's Ninfa, she likes quilting and works at The J.M. Smucker Company, she's an early bird and prefers mornings. Does that ring any bells?\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Ninfa from The J.M. Smucker Company doesn't sound familiar, I'm afraid. And speaking of outdoor enthusiasts, have you ever come across a charming individual named Blake? He also has a knack for dancing and is associated with The J.M. Smucker Company. He mostly spends his evenings out in the open. How about him?\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins said: \"Blake from The J.M. Smucker Company, you say? I can't recall meeting a Blake, apologies. However, dancing outdoors in the evenings sounds very similar to another friend I know named Angelica. She's a homebrewer and works at Planet Hollywood. Have you possibly crossed paths with her?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Angelica from Planet Hollywood, doesn't sound familiar to me, I'm sorry. It seems like we have connections in similar circles though. Let me mention Louise, she loves dancing in the evening like Angelica and works at Cray. Maybe you know her?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMarie: Hobby: Acting Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nHarvey: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: Sony Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nFrank: Hobby: Deltiology Company: Ebonite International Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nVera: Hobby: Watching movies Company: Gentiva Health Services Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nLawrence: Hobby: Kayaking Company: Ebonite International Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nLouise: Hobby: Dancing Company: Cray Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nDallas: Hobby: Dancing Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nNancy: Hobby: Dancing Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nBlake: Hobby: Dancing Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hello there, Esmeralda. I couldn't help but overhear that you enjoy homebrewing. Is that right?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Oh, well, homebrewing isn't quite my cup of tea Miles. However, could you help me remember? I believe we might have a mutual friend who is also passionate about it. Does the name Harvey ring a bell? He loves amateur radio, and works at Sony, if that helps jog your memory.\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Oh, sure I know Harvey! Quite the interesting character, isn't he? He makes my passion for gardening seems rather mainstream in comparison. Speaking of gardening, I've got this friend, David, who is into homebrewing. He works at the Christian Moerlein Brewing Company. Do you happen to know him?\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"David from Christian Moerlein Brewing Company? Can't say I'm familiar with him. And speaking of creativity and uniqueness, I have a friend named Marie who's greatly involved in acting. She works at Southern New England Telephone and prefers spending her afternoons outdoors. Perhaps you've crossed paths with her as well?\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"Marie at Southern New England Telephone? Sorry, I can't say I've met her. However, speaking of the outdoors, I know a few people who also love the open air. For instance, there's Ninfa, she likes quilting and works at The J.M. Smucker Company, she's an early bird and prefers mornings. Does that ring any bells?\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Ninfa from The J.M. Smucker Company doesn't sound familiar, I'm afraid. And speaking of outdoor enthusiasts, have you ever come across a charming individual named Blake? He also has a knack for dancing and is associated with The J.M. Smucker Company. He mostly spends his evenings out in the open. How about him?\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins said: \"Blake from The J.M. Smucker Company, you say? I can't recall meeting a Blake, apologies. However, dancing outdoors in the evenings sounds very similar to another friend I know named Angelica. She's a homebrewer and works at Planet Hollywood. Have you possibly crossed paths with her?\"\n\nTurn #7: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Angelica from Planet Hollywood, doesn't sound familiar to me, I'm sorry. It seems like we have connections in similar circles though. Let me mention Louise, she loves dancing in the evening like Angelica and works at Cray. Maybe you know her?\"\n\nTurn #8: Miles Hawkins said: \"Louise who works at Cray? Does she happen to homebrew as well? Because I do know a Lynn who works at Cray, enjoys homebrewing, and is quite fond of spending her evenings outdoors. Does that description match your friend?\"\n\nTurn #9: Esmeralda Solis said: \"No, it seems there might be some confusion, Lynn isn't the one I meant. Louise does share the love for dancing and spending evenings outdoors, but she's not into homebrewing, I'm afraid. I appreciate your time, Miles. It's rather fascinating how interconnected our worlds are, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #10: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Esmeralda! It's pretty remarkable, isn't it? I find it fascinating how hobbies and interests can intersect and weave together our social networks. It's clear we indeed swim in similar circles. Great speaking with you today.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Indeed, Miles. Our hobbies and interests serve as a unique fabric connecting us with so many different people. It was a pleasure speaking with you today. I hope we can continue this conversation in the future, maybe even finding our mutual acquaintances. Have a wonderful evening!'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sasha Ramirez, your task is to act/speak as Sasha Ramirez would, keeping in mind Sasha Ramirez's social goal.\nYou can find Sasha Ramirez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sasha Ramirez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sasha Ramirez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Amara Hartley\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. Sasha's secrets: She covered up a crime her brother committed.\nAmara Hartley's background: \nSasha Ramirez's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nElizabeth: School: Eastern Nazarene College Time Preference: morning Major: Social Science Education Location Preference: outdoor \nEric: School: San Jose State University Time Preference: evening Major: Geological Engineering Location Preference: outdoor \nLeroy: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nThanh: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nMarva: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Bioengineering Location Preference: outdoor \nMichael: School: Williams College Time Preference: morning Major: Marine Biology Location Preference: outdoor \nVirginia: School: Williams College Time Preference: evening Major: Applied Mathematics Location Preference: outdoor \nDebra: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Psychology Location Preference: outdoor \nEugenia: School: Stephens College Time Preference: morning Major: Psychology Location Preference: outdoor \nRoberto: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: morning Major: Electrical Technology Location Preference: outdoor \nMark: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: morning Major: Sports, Recreation, & Leisure Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nGeorgene: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: evening Major: Bioengineering Location Preference: outdoor \n\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hello there, I'm Sasha, it's nice to meet you! This is some party, isn't it? Have you attended a gathering like this before?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMarie: Hobby: Acting Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nHarvey: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: Sony Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nFrank: Hobby: Deltiology Company: Ebonite International Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nVera: Hobby: Watching movies Company: Gentiva Health Services Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nLawrence: Hobby: Kayaking Company: Ebonite International Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nLouise: Hobby: Dancing Company: Cray Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nDallas: Hobby: Dancing Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nNancy: Hobby: Dancing Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nBlake: Hobby: Dancing Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hello there, Esmeralda. I couldn't help but overhear that you enjoy homebrewing. Is that right?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Oh, well, homebrewing isn't quite my cup of tea Miles. However, could you help me remember? I believe we might have a mutual friend who is also passionate about it. Does the name Harvey ring a bell? He loves amateur radio, and works at Sony, if that helps jog your memory.\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Oh, sure I know Harvey! Quite the interesting character, isn't he? He makes my passion for gardening seems rather mainstream in comparison. Speaking of gardening, I've got this friend, David, who is into homebrewing. He works at the Christian Moerlein Brewing Company. Do you happen to know him?\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"David from Christian Moerlein Brewing Company? Can't say I'm familiar with him. And speaking of creativity and uniqueness, I have a friend named Marie who's greatly involved in acting. She works at Southern New England Telephone and prefers spending her afternoons outdoors. Perhaps you've crossed paths with her as well?\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"Marie at Southern New England Telephone? Sorry, I can't say I've met her. However, speaking of the outdoors, I know a few people who also love the open air. For instance, there's Ninfa, she likes quilting and works at The J.M. Smucker Company, she's an early bird and prefers mornings. Does that ring any bells?\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Ninfa from The J.M. Smucker Company doesn't sound familiar, I'm afraid. And speaking of outdoor enthusiasts, have you ever come across a charming individual named Blake? He also has a knack for dancing and is associated with The J.M. Smucker Company. He mostly spends his evenings out in the open. How about him?\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins said: \"Blake from The J.M. Smucker Company, you say? I can't recall meeting a Blake, apologies. However, dancing outdoors in the evenings sounds very similar to another friend I know named Angelica. She's a homebrewer and works at Planet Hollywood. Have you possibly crossed paths with her?\"\n\nTurn #7: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Angelica from Planet Hollywood, doesn't sound familiar to me, I'm sorry. It seems like we have connections in similar circles though. Let me mention Louise, she loves dancing in the evening like Angelica and works at Cray. Maybe you know her?\"\n\nTurn #8: Miles Hawkins said: \"Louise who works at Cray? Does she happen to homebrew as well? Because I do know a Lynn who works at Cray, enjoys homebrewing, and is quite fond of spending her evenings outdoors. Does that description match your friend?\"\n\nTurn #9: Esmeralda Solis said: \"No, it seems there might be some confusion, Lynn isn't the one I meant. Louise does share the love for dancing and spending evenings outdoors, but she's not into homebrewing, I'm afraid. I appreciate your time, Miles. It's rather fascinating how interconnected our worlds are, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #10: Miles Hawkins said: \"Absolutely, Esmeralda! It's pretty remarkable, isn't it? I find it fascinating how hobbies and interests can intersect and weave together our social networks. It's clear we indeed swim in similar circles. Great speaking with you today.\"\n\nTurn #11: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Indeed, Miles. Our hobbies and interests serve as a unique fabric connecting us with so many different people. It was a pleasure speaking with you today. I hope we can continue this conversation in the future, maybe even finding our mutual acquaintances. Have a wonderful evening!\"\n\nTurn #12: Miles Hawkins said: \"Indeed, the more we speak, the smaller the world seems to become, doesn't it? I'm looking forward to getting to know more about our shared connections, Esmeralda. Have a fantastic evening as well!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sasha Ramirez, your task is to act/speak as Sasha Ramirez would, keeping in mind Sasha Ramirez's social goal.\nYou can find Sasha Ramirez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sasha Ramirez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sasha Ramirez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Amara Hartley\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. Sasha's secrets: She covered up a crime her brother committed.\nAmara Hartley's background: \nSasha Ramirez's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nElizabeth: School: Eastern Nazarene College Time Preference: morning Major: Social Science Education Location Preference: outdoor \nEric: School: San Jose State University Time Preference: evening Major: Geological Engineering Location Preference: outdoor \nLeroy: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nThanh: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nMarva: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Bioengineering Location Preference: outdoor \nMichael: School: Williams College Time Preference: morning Major: Marine Biology Location Preference: outdoor \nVirginia: School: Williams College Time Preference: evening Major: Applied Mathematics Location Preference: outdoor \nDebra: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Psychology Location Preference: outdoor \nEugenia: School: Stephens College Time Preference: morning Major: Psychology Location Preference: outdoor \nRoberto: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: morning Major: Electrical Technology Location Preference: outdoor \nMark: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: morning Major: Sports, Recreation, & Leisure Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nGeorgene: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: evening Major: Bioengineering Location Preference: outdoor \n\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hello there, I'm Sasha, it's nice to meet you! This is some party, isn't it? Have you attended a gathering like this before?\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"Hello Sasha, I'm Amara. Yes, it's quite livelier than I'm used to, since I usually spend my days outdoors studying wildlife. By the way, have you by any chance gone to school in or near New Jersey or Massachusetts? I've got a couple of friends who studied there, just shooting in the dark here.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Well, I didn't study in either of those states, but my friend Leroy studied Greek at Trenton State College in New Jersey. It's nice to find a fellow lover of the great outdoors. Since you study wildlife I bet you'd get along well with my friend Michael. He studied marine biology at Williams College and loves spending his mornings outdoors. Should I know any of your friends?\"\n\nTurn #3: Amara Hartley said: \"Isn't it wonderful how nature connects us with unexpected people? Your friend Michael is quite similar to my friend Thanh, who also graduated from Williams College and is a classics enthusiast like Leroy. He spends the afternoon exploring diverse landscapes. But you've piqued my curiosity, Sasha, do any of your friends have a penchant for Conflict Resolution Studies? I have a friend, Brenda from Trenton State College, who loves discussing these matters during outdoor evening gatherings.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"It sounds like your friend Brenda shares a lot in common with my friend Eric from San Jose State University. He majored in Geological Engineering, but always had an interest in resolving any sorts of conflicts he came across. And like Brenda, he also enjoys spending the evening in an outdoor setting. It's interesting, such different fields of study, yet with similar interests, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Amara Hartley said: \"Indeed, Sasha, it's fascinating how our fields of study may vary, yet our interests can intersect so beautifully. It reminded me of my friend Anthony from Oberlin College, who studied Conflict Resolution Studies, and like Eric, enjoys the outdoor natural setting during the conservative hours of the day. Isn't life full of wonderful synchronicities?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Amara, life is indeed full of wonderful synchronicities. I have a friend named Elizabeth who also studied at Eastern Nazarene College. Much like your friend Anthony, she's a morning person and enjoys being outdoors. They may not share the same academic field, Elizabeth studied Social Science Education, but similarly, they both sure love to take in the morning air surrounded by nature. It's remarkable how interests can cross academic boundaries, don't you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sasha Ramirez, your task is to act/speak as Sasha Ramirez would, keeping in mind Sasha Ramirez's social goal.\nYou can find Sasha Ramirez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sasha Ramirez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sasha Ramirez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Amara Hartley\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. Sasha's secrets: She covered up a crime her brother committed.\nAmara Hartley's background: \nSasha Ramirez's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nElizabeth: School: Eastern Nazarene College Time Preference: morning Major: Social Science Education Location Preference: outdoor \nEric: School: San Jose State University Time Preference: evening Major: Geological Engineering Location Preference: outdoor \nLeroy: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nThanh: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nMarva: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Bioengineering Location Preference: outdoor \nMichael: School: Williams College Time Preference: morning Major: Marine Biology Location Preference: outdoor \nVirginia: School: Williams College Time Preference: evening Major: Applied Mathematics Location Preference: outdoor \nDebra: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Psychology Location Preference: outdoor \nEugenia: School: Stephens College Time Preference: morning Major: Psychology Location Preference: outdoor \nRoberto: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: morning Major: Electrical Technology Location Preference: outdoor \nMark: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: morning Major: Sports, Recreation, & Leisure Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nGeorgene: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: evening Major: Bioengineering Location Preference: outdoor \n\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hello there, I'm Sasha, it's nice to meet you! This is some party, isn't it? Have you attended a gathering like this before?\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"Hello Sasha, I'm Amara. Yes, it's quite livelier than I'm used to, since I usually spend my days outdoors studying wildlife. By the way, have you by any chance gone to school in or near New Jersey or Massachusetts? I've got a couple of friends who studied there, just shooting in the dark here.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Well, I didn't study in either of those states, but my friend Leroy studied Greek at Trenton State College in New Jersey. It's nice to find a fellow lover of the great outdoors. Since you study wildlife I bet you'd get along well with my friend Michael. He studied marine biology at Williams College and loves spending his mornings outdoors. Should I know any of your friends?\"\n\nTurn #3: Amara Hartley said: \"Isn't it wonderful how nature connects us with unexpected people? Your friend Michael is quite similar to my friend Thanh, who also graduated from Williams College and is a classics enthusiast like Leroy. He spends the afternoon exploring diverse landscapes. But you've piqued my curiosity, Sasha, do any of your friends have a penchant for Conflict Resolution Studies? I have a friend, Brenda from Trenton State College, who loves discussing these matters during outdoor evening gatherings.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"It sounds like your friend Brenda shares a lot in common with my friend Eric from San Jose State University. He majored in Geological Engineering, but always had an interest in resolving any sorts of conflicts he came across. And like Brenda, he also enjoys spending the evening in an outdoor setting. It's interesting, such different fields of study, yet with similar interests, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Amara Hartley said: \"Indeed, Sasha, it's fascinating how our fields of study may vary, yet our interests can intersect so beautifully. It reminded me of my friend Anthony from Oberlin College, who studied Conflict Resolution Studies, and like Eric, enjoys the outdoor natural setting during the conservative hours of the day. Isn't life full of wonderful synchronicities?\"\n\nTurn #6: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Absolutely, Amara, life is indeed full of wonderful synchronicities. I have a friend named Elizabeth who also studied at Eastern Nazarene College. Much like your friend Anthony, she's a morning person and enjoys being outdoors. They may not share the same academic field, Elizabeth studied Social Science Education, but similarly, they both sure love to take in the morning air surrounded by nature. It's remarkable how interests can cross academic boundaries, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #7: Amara Hartley said: \"Truly remarkable, Sasha. It reminds me of my friend James from Williams College. He studied Materials Engineering but has a proclivity for taking lengthy explorations outdoors in the afternoon, much like Elizabeth. Indeed, these interests do have a way of breaching academic confines. James loves being around nature just as much as I do. I bet your friend Michael would like him. They have this common thread of curiosity for our natural environment, don't you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I totally agree, Amara. Your friend James seems to be quite the explorer much like my friend Marva, who also attended Williams College studying Bioengineering. She loves spending her afternoons outdoors, especially when she can combine it with her research. She often tells me how the natural environment fuels her discoveries. I suppose curiosity really is a universal trait, isn't it? Would love to introduce Marva to James one day.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sasha Ramirez, your task is to act/speak as Sasha Ramirez would, keeping in mind Sasha Ramirez's social goal.\nYou can find Sasha Ramirez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sasha Ramirez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sasha Ramirez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Amara Hartley\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. Sasha's secrets: She covered up a crime her brother committed.\nAmara Hartley's background: \nSasha Ramirez's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nElizabeth: School: Eastern Nazarene College Time Preference: morning Major: Social Science Education Location Preference: outdoor \nEric: School: San Jose State University Time Preference: evening Major: Geological Engineering Location Preference: outdoor \nLeroy: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nThanh: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nMarva: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Bioengineering Location Preference: outdoor \nMichael: School: Williams College Time Preference: morning Major: Marine Biology Location Preference: outdoor \nVirginia: School: Williams College Time Preference: evening Major: Applied Mathematics Location Preference: outdoor \nDebra: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Psychology Location Preference: outdoor \nEugenia: School: Stephens College Time Preference: morning Major: Psychology Location Preference: outdoor \nRoberto: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: morning Major: Electrical Technology Location Preference: outdoor \nMark: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: morning Major: Sports, Recreation, & Leisure Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nGeorgene: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: evening Major: Bioengineering Location Preference: outdoor \n\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hello there, I'm Sasha, it's nice to meet you! This is some party, isn't it? Have you attended a gathering like this before?\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"Hello Sasha, I'm Amara. Yes, it's quite livelier than I'm used to, since I usually spend my days outdoors studying wildlife. By the way, have you by any chance gone to school in or near New Jersey or Massachusetts? I've got a couple of friends who studied there, just shooting in the dark here.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Well, I didn't study in either of those states, but my friend Leroy studied Greek at Trenton State College in New Jersey. It's nice to find a fellow lover of the great outdoors. Since you study wildlife I bet you'd get along well with my friend Michael. He studied marine biology at Williams College and loves spending his mornings outdoors. Should I know any of your friends?\"\n\nTurn #3: Amara Hartley said: \"Isn't it wonderful how nature connects us with unexpected people? Your friend Michael is quite similar to my friend Thanh, who also graduated from Williams College and is a classics enthusiast like Leroy. He spends the afternoon exploring diverse landscapes. But you've piqued my curiosity, Sasha, do any of your friends have a penchant for Conflict Resolution Studies? I have a friend, Brenda from Trenton State College, who loves discussing these matters during outdoor evening gatherings.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"It sounds like your friend Brenda shares a lot in common with my friend Eric from San Jose State University. He majored in Geological Engineering, but always had an interest in resolving any sorts of conflicts he came across. And like Brenda, he also enjoys spending the evening in an outdoor setting. It's interesting, such different fields of study, yet with similar interests, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Amara Hartley said: \"Indeed, Sasha, it's fascinating how our fields of study may vary, yet our interests can intersect so beautifully. It reminded me of my friend Anthony from Oberlin College, who studied Conflict Resolution Studies, and like Eric, enjoys the outdoor natural setting during the conservative hours of the day. Isn't life full of wonderful synchronicities?\"\n\nTurn #6: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Absolutely, Amara, life is indeed full of wonderful synchronicities. I have a friend named Elizabeth who also studied at Eastern Nazarene College. Much like your friend Anthony, she's a morning person and enjoys being outdoors. They may not share the same academic field, Elizabeth studied Social Science Education, but similarly, they both sure love to take in the morning air surrounded by nature. It's remarkable how interests can cross academic boundaries, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #7: Amara Hartley said: \"Truly remarkable, Sasha. It reminds me of my friend James from Williams College. He studied Materials Engineering but has a proclivity for taking lengthy explorations outdoors in the afternoon, much like Elizabeth. Indeed, these interests do have a way of breaching academic confines. James loves being around nature just as much as I do. I bet your friend Michael would like him. They have this common thread of curiosity for our natural environment, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #8: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I totally agree, Amara. Your friend James seems to be quite the explorer much like my friend Marva, who also attended Williams College studying Bioengineering. She loves spending her afternoons outdoors, especially when she can combine it with her research. She often tells me how the natural environment fuels her discoveries. I suppose curiosity really is a universal trait, isn't it? Would love to introduce Marva to James one day.\"\n\nTurn #9: Amara Hartley said: \"Definitely, Sasha. It's an interesting perspective how similar traits transcend disciplines and Grad schools. James would indeed appreciate meeting someone as intellectually curious as Marva from his alma mater. And perhaps they could indeed make the most of those afternoon explorations together. I'm so glad we had this fascinating discussion on our friends' passions and interests. It really makes me appreciate the various paths life gives us even more.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Yes, Amara, it's indeed a joy discovering how these paths cross and intertwine in unexpected ways. It was a pleasure sharing this enlightening conversation with you. I think our friends would indeed enjoy these interactions as much as we did. Your perspective made me appreciate my friends' passion and their unique paths even more.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sasha Ramirez, your task is to act/speak as Sasha Ramirez would, keeping in mind Sasha Ramirez's social goal.\nYou can find Sasha Ramirez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sasha Ramirez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sasha Ramirez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Amara Hartley\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. Sasha's secrets: She covered up a crime her brother committed.\nAmara Hartley's background: \nSasha Ramirez's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nElizabeth: School: Eastern Nazarene College Time Preference: morning Major: Social Science Education Location Preference: outdoor \nEric: School: San Jose State University Time Preference: evening Major: Geological Engineering Location Preference: outdoor \nLeroy: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nThanh: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nMarva: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Bioengineering Location Preference: outdoor \nMichael: School: Williams College Time Preference: morning Major: Marine Biology Location Preference: outdoor \nVirginia: School: Williams College Time Preference: evening Major: Applied Mathematics Location Preference: outdoor \nDebra: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Psychology Location Preference: outdoor \nEugenia: School: Stephens College Time Preference: morning Major: Psychology Location Preference: outdoor \nRoberto: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: morning Major: Electrical Technology Location Preference: outdoor \nMark: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: morning Major: Sports, Recreation, & Leisure Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nGeorgene: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: evening Major: Bioengineering Location Preference: outdoor \n\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hello there, I'm Sasha, it's nice to meet you! This is some party, isn't it? Have you attended a gathering like this before?\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"Hello Sasha, I'm Amara. Yes, it's quite livelier than I'm used to, since I usually spend my days outdoors studying wildlife. By the way, have you by any chance gone to school in or near New Jersey or Massachusetts? I've got a couple of friends who studied there, just shooting in the dark here.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Well, I didn't study in either of those states, but my friend Leroy studied Greek at Trenton State College in New Jersey. It's nice to find a fellow lover of the great outdoors. Since you study wildlife I bet you'd get along well with my friend Michael. He studied marine biology at Williams College and loves spending his mornings outdoors. Should I know any of your friends?\"\n\nTurn #3: Amara Hartley said: \"Isn't it wonderful how nature connects us with unexpected people? Your friend Michael is quite similar to my friend Thanh, who also graduated from Williams College and is a classics enthusiast like Leroy. He spends the afternoon exploring diverse landscapes. But you've piqued my curiosity, Sasha, do any of your friends have a penchant for Conflict Resolution Studies? I have a friend, Brenda from Trenton State College, who loves discussing these matters during outdoor evening gatherings.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"It sounds like your friend Brenda shares a lot in common with my friend Eric from San Jose State University. He majored in Geological Engineering, but always had an interest in resolving any sorts of conflicts he came across. And like Brenda, he also enjoys spending the evening in an outdoor setting. It's interesting, such different fields of study, yet with similar interests, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Amara Hartley said: \"Indeed, Sasha, it's fascinating how our fields of study may vary, yet our interests can intersect so beautifully. It reminded me of my friend Anthony from Oberlin College, who studied Conflict Resolution Studies, and like Eric, enjoys the outdoor natural setting during the conservative hours of the day. Isn't life full of wonderful synchronicities?\"\n\nTurn #6: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Absolutely, Amara, life is indeed full of wonderful synchronicities. I have a friend named Elizabeth who also studied at Eastern Nazarene College. Much like your friend Anthony, she's a morning person and enjoys being outdoors. They may not share the same academic field, Elizabeth studied Social Science Education, but similarly, they both sure love to take in the morning air surrounded by nature. It's remarkable how interests can cross academic boundaries, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #7: Amara Hartley said: \"Truly remarkable, Sasha. It reminds me of my friend James from Williams College. He studied Materials Engineering but has a proclivity for taking lengthy explorations outdoors in the afternoon, much like Elizabeth. Indeed, these interests do have a way of breaching academic confines. James loves being around nature just as much as I do. I bet your friend Michael would like him. They have this common thread of curiosity for our natural environment, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #8: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I totally agree, Amara. Your friend James seems to be quite the explorer much like my friend Marva, who also attended Williams College studying Bioengineering. She loves spending her afternoons outdoors, especially when she can combine it with her research. She often tells me how the natural environment fuels her discoveries. I suppose curiosity really is a universal trait, isn't it? Would love to introduce Marva to James one day.\"\n\nTurn #9: Amara Hartley said: \"Definitely, Sasha. It's an interesting perspective how similar traits transcend disciplines and Grad schools. James would indeed appreciate meeting someone as intellectually curious as Marva from his alma mater. And perhaps they could indeed make the most of those afternoon explorations together. I'm so glad we had this fascinating discussion on our friends' passions and interests. It really makes me appreciate the various paths life gives us even more.\"\n\nTurn #10: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Yes, Amara, it's indeed a joy discovering how these paths cross and intertwine in unexpected ways. It was a pleasure sharing this enlightening conversation with you. I think our friends would indeed enjoy these interactions as much as we did. Your perspective made me appreciate my friends' passion and their unique paths even more.\"\n\nTurn #11: Amara Hartley left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sasha Ramirez, your task is to act/speak as Sasha Ramirez would, keeping in mind Sasha Ramirez's social goal.\nYou can find Sasha Ramirez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sasha Ramirez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sasha Ramirez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Amara Hartley\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. Sasha's secrets: She covered up a crime her brother committed.\nAmara Hartley's background: \nSasha Ramirez's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nElizabeth: School: Eastern Nazarene College Time Preference: morning Major: Social Science Education Location Preference: outdoor \nEric: School: San Jose State University Time Preference: evening Major: Geological Engineering Location Preference: outdoor \nLeroy: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nThanh: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nMarva: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Bioengineering Location Preference: outdoor \nMichael: School: Williams College Time Preference: morning Major: Marine Biology Location Preference: outdoor \nVirginia: School: Williams College Time Preference: evening Major: Applied Mathematics Location Preference: outdoor \nDebra: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Psychology Location Preference: outdoor \nEugenia: School: Stephens College Time Preference: morning Major: Psychology Location Preference: outdoor \nRoberto: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: morning Major: Electrical Technology Location Preference: outdoor \nMark: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: morning Major: Sports, Recreation, & Leisure Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nGeorgene: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: evening Major: Bioengineering Location Preference: outdoor \n\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hello there, I'm Sasha, it's nice to meet you! This is some party, isn't it? Have you attended a gathering like this before?\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"Hello Sasha, I'm Amara. Yes, it's quite livelier than I'm used to, since I usually spend my days outdoors studying wildlife. By the way, have you by any chance gone to school in or near New Jersey or Massachusetts? I've got a couple of friends who studied there, just shooting in the dark here.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Well, I didn't study in either of those states, but my friend Leroy studied Greek at Trenton State College in New Jersey. It's nice to find a fellow lover of the great outdoors. Since you study wildlife I bet you'd get along well with my friend Michael. He studied marine biology at Williams College and loves spending his mornings outdoors. Should I know any of your friends?\"\n\nTurn #3: Amara Hartley said: \"Isn't it wonderful how nature connects us with unexpected people? Your friend Michael is quite similar to my friend Thanh, who also graduated from Williams College and is a classics enthusiast like Leroy. He spends the afternoon exploring diverse landscapes. But you've piqued my curiosity, Sasha, do any of your friends have a penchant for Conflict Resolution Studies? I have a friend, Brenda from Trenton State College, who loves discussing these matters during outdoor evening gatherings.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"It sounds like your friend Brenda shares a lot in common with my friend Eric from San Jose State University. He majored in Geological Engineering, but always had an interest in resolving any sorts of conflicts he came across. And like Brenda, he also enjoys spending the evening in an outdoor setting. It's interesting, such different fields of study, yet with similar interests, don't you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sasha Ramirez, your task is to act/speak as Sasha Ramirez would, keeping in mind Sasha Ramirez's social goal.\nYou can find Sasha Ramirez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sasha Ramirez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sasha Ramirez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Amara Hartley\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. Sasha's secrets: She covered up a crime her brother committed.\nAmara Hartley's background: \nSasha Ramirez's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nElizabeth: School: Eastern Nazarene College Time Preference: morning Major: Social Science Education Location Preference: outdoor \nEric: School: San Jose State University Time Preference: evening Major: Geological Engineering Location Preference: outdoor \nLeroy: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nThanh: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nMarva: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Bioengineering Location Preference: outdoor \nMichael: School: Williams College Time Preference: morning Major: Marine Biology Location Preference: outdoor \nVirginia: School: Williams College Time Preference: evening Major: Applied Mathematics Location Preference: outdoor \nDebra: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Psychology Location Preference: outdoor \nEugenia: School: Stephens College Time Preference: morning Major: Psychology Location Preference: outdoor \nRoberto: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: morning Major: Electrical Technology Location Preference: outdoor \nMark: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: morning Major: Sports, Recreation, & Leisure Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nGeorgene: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: evening Major: Bioengineering Location Preference: outdoor \n\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hello there, I'm Sasha, it's nice to meet you! This is some party, isn't it? Have you attended a gathering like this before?\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"Hello Sasha, I'm Amara. Yes, it's quite livelier than I'm used to, since I usually spend my days outdoors studying wildlife. By the way, have you by any chance gone to school in or near New Jersey or Massachusetts? I've got a couple of friends who studied there, just shooting in the dark here.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Well, I didn't study in either of those states, but my friend Leroy studied Greek at Trenton State College in New Jersey. It's nice to find a fellow lover of the great outdoors. Since you study wildlife I bet you'd get along well with my friend Michael. He studied marine biology at Williams College and loves spending his mornings outdoors. Should I know any of your friends?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Amara Hartley\nSasha Ramirez's background: \nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nSasha Ramirez's goal: Unknown\nAmara Hartley's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nThanh: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nVance: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Vocational Education Location Preference: outdoor \nBrenda: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: evening Major: Conflict Resolution Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nAlice: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Crafts & Artisanry Location Preference: indoor \nThomas: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Asian Languages Location Preference: indoor \nJanet: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Greek Location Preference: indoor \nRobert: School: Rutgers University, Newark Time Preference: morning Major: Protestant Affiliation Location Preference: indoor \nAnthony: School: Oberlin College Time Preference: morning Major: Conflict Resolution Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nElvera: School: Muskingum College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Crafts & Artisanry Location Preference: outdoor \nJames: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Materials Engineering Location Preference: outdoor \nEdgar: School: Muskingum College Time Preference: morning Major: Conflict Resolution Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nKristen: School: Oberlin College Time Preference: evening Major: Electrical Technology Location Preference: indoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hello there, I'm Sasha, it's nice to meet you! This is some party, isn't it? Have you attended a gathering like this before?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hello Sasha, I'm Amara. Yes, it's quite livelier than I'm used to, since I usually spend my days outdoors studying wildlife. By the way, have you by any chance gone to school in or near New Jersey or Massachusetts? I've got a couple of friends who studied there, just shooting in the dark here.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Amara Hartley\nSasha Ramirez's background: \nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nSasha Ramirez's goal: Unknown\nAmara Hartley's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nThanh: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nVance: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Vocational Education Location Preference: outdoor \nBrenda: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: evening Major: Conflict Resolution Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nAlice: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Crafts & Artisanry Location Preference: indoor \nThomas: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Asian Languages Location Preference: indoor \nJanet: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Greek Location Preference: indoor \nRobert: School: Rutgers University, Newark Time Preference: morning Major: Protestant Affiliation Location Preference: indoor \nAnthony: School: Oberlin College Time Preference: morning Major: Conflict Resolution Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nElvera: School: Muskingum College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Crafts & Artisanry Location Preference: outdoor \nJames: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Materials Engineering Location Preference: outdoor \nEdgar: School: Muskingum College Time Preference: morning Major: Conflict Resolution Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nKristen: School: Oberlin College Time Preference: evening Major: Electrical Technology Location Preference: indoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hello there, I'm Sasha, it's nice to meet you! This is some party, isn't it? Have you attended a gathering like this before?\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"Hello Sasha, I'm Amara. Yes, it's quite livelier than I'm used to, since I usually spend my days outdoors studying wildlife. By the way, have you by any chance gone to school in or near New Jersey or Massachusetts? I've got a couple of friends who studied there, just shooting in the dark here.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Well, I didn't study in either of those states, but my friend Leroy studied Greek at Trenton State College in New Jersey. It's nice to find a fellow lover of the great outdoors. Since you study wildlife I bet you'd get along well with my friend Michael. He studied marine biology at Williams College and loves spending his mornings outdoors. Should I know any of your friends?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Isn't it wonderful how nature connects us with unexpected people? Your friend Michael is quite similar to my friend Thanh, who also graduated from Williams College and is a classics enthusiast like Leroy. He spends the afternoon exploring diverse landscapes. But you've piqued my curiosity, Sasha, do any of your friends have a penchant for Conflict Resolution Studies? I have a friend, Brenda from Trenton State College, who loves discussing these matters during outdoor evening gatherings.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Amara Hartley\nSasha Ramirez's background: \nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nSasha Ramirez's goal: Unknown\nAmara Hartley's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nThanh: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nVance: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Vocational Education Location Preference: outdoor \nBrenda: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: evening Major: Conflict Resolution Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nAlice: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Crafts & Artisanry Location Preference: indoor \nThomas: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Asian Languages Location Preference: indoor \nJanet: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Greek Location Preference: indoor \nRobert: School: Rutgers University, Newark Time Preference: morning Major: Protestant Affiliation Location Preference: indoor \nAnthony: School: Oberlin College Time Preference: morning Major: Conflict Resolution Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nElvera: School: Muskingum College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Crafts & Artisanry Location Preference: outdoor \nJames: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Materials Engineering Location Preference: outdoor \nEdgar: School: Muskingum College Time Preference: morning Major: Conflict Resolution Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nKristen: School: Oberlin College Time Preference: evening Major: Electrical Technology Location Preference: indoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hello there, I'm Sasha, it's nice to meet you! This is some party, isn't it? Have you attended a gathering like this before?\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"Hello Sasha, I'm Amara. Yes, it's quite livelier than I'm used to, since I usually spend my days outdoors studying wildlife. By the way, have you by any chance gone to school in or near New Jersey or Massachusetts? I've got a couple of friends who studied there, just shooting in the dark here.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Well, I didn't study in either of those states, but my friend Leroy studied Greek at Trenton State College in New Jersey. It's nice to find a fellow lover of the great outdoors. Since you study wildlife I bet you'd get along well with my friend Michael. He studied marine biology at Williams College and loves spending his mornings outdoors. Should I know any of your friends?\"\n\nTurn #3: Amara Hartley said: \"Isn't it wonderful how nature connects us with unexpected people? Your friend Michael is quite similar to my friend Thanh, who also graduated from Williams College and is a classics enthusiast like Leroy. He spends the afternoon exploring diverse landscapes. But you've piqued my curiosity, Sasha, do any of your friends have a penchant for Conflict Resolution Studies? I have a friend, Brenda from Trenton State College, who loves discussing these matters during outdoor evening gatherings.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"It sounds like your friend Brenda shares a lot in common with my friend Eric from San Jose State University. He majored in Geological Engineering, but always had an interest in resolving any sorts of conflicts he came across. And like Brenda, he also enjoys spending the evening in an outdoor setting. It's interesting, such different fields of study, yet with similar interests, don't you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, Sasha, it's fascinating how our fields of study may vary, yet our interests can intersect so beautifully. It reminded me of my friend Anthony from Oberlin College, who studied Conflict Resolution Studies, and like Eric, enjoys the outdoor natural setting during the conservative hours of the day. Isn't life full of wonderful synchronicities?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Amara Hartley\nSasha Ramirez's background: \nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nSasha Ramirez's goal: Unknown\nAmara Hartley's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nThanh: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nVance: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Vocational Education Location Preference: outdoor \nBrenda: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: evening Major: Conflict Resolution Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nAlice: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Crafts & Artisanry Location Preference: indoor \nThomas: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Asian Languages Location Preference: indoor \nJanet: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Greek Location Preference: indoor \nRobert: School: Rutgers University, Newark Time Preference: morning Major: Protestant Affiliation Location Preference: indoor \nAnthony: School: Oberlin College Time Preference: morning Major: Conflict Resolution Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nElvera: School: Muskingum College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Crafts & Artisanry Location Preference: outdoor \nJames: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Materials Engineering Location Preference: outdoor \nEdgar: School: Muskingum College Time Preference: morning Major: Conflict Resolution Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nKristen: School: Oberlin College Time Preference: evening Major: Electrical Technology Location Preference: indoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hello there, I'm Sasha, it's nice to meet you! This is some party, isn't it? Have you attended a gathering like this before?\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"Hello Sasha, I'm Amara. Yes, it's quite livelier than I'm used to, since I usually spend my days outdoors studying wildlife. By the way, have you by any chance gone to school in or near New Jersey or Massachusetts? I've got a couple of friends who studied there, just shooting in the dark here.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Well, I didn't study in either of those states, but my friend Leroy studied Greek at Trenton State College in New Jersey. It's nice to find a fellow lover of the great outdoors. Since you study wildlife I bet you'd get along well with my friend Michael. He studied marine biology at Williams College and loves spending his mornings outdoors. Should I know any of your friends?\"\n\nTurn #3: Amara Hartley said: \"Isn't it wonderful how nature connects us with unexpected people? Your friend Michael is quite similar to my friend Thanh, who also graduated from Williams College and is a classics enthusiast like Leroy. He spends the afternoon exploring diverse landscapes. But you've piqued my curiosity, Sasha, do any of your friends have a penchant for Conflict Resolution Studies? I have a friend, Brenda from Trenton State College, who loves discussing these matters during outdoor evening gatherings.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"It sounds like your friend Brenda shares a lot in common with my friend Eric from San Jose State University. He majored in Geological Engineering, but always had an interest in resolving any sorts of conflicts he came across. And like Brenda, he also enjoys spending the evening in an outdoor setting. It's interesting, such different fields of study, yet with similar interests, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Amara Hartley said: \"Indeed, Sasha, it's fascinating how our fields of study may vary, yet our interests can intersect so beautifully. It reminded me of my friend Anthony from Oberlin College, who studied Conflict Resolution Studies, and like Eric, enjoys the outdoor natural setting during the conservative hours of the day. Isn't life full of wonderful synchronicities?\"\n\nTurn #6: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Absolutely, Amara, life is indeed full of wonderful synchronicities. I have a friend named Elizabeth who also studied at Eastern Nazarene College. Much like your friend Anthony, she's a morning person and enjoys being outdoors. They may not share the same academic field, Elizabeth studied Social Science Education, but similarly, they both sure love to take in the morning air surrounded by nature. It's remarkable how interests can cross academic boundaries, don't you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Truly remarkable, Sasha. It reminds me of my friend James from Williams College. He studied Materials Engineering but has a proclivity for taking lengthy explorations outdoors in the afternoon, much like Elizabeth. Indeed, these interests do have a way of breaching academic confines. James loves being around nature just as much as I do. I bet your friend Michael would like him. They have this common thread of curiosity for our natural environment, don't you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Amara Hartley\nSasha Ramirez's background: \nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nSasha Ramirez's goal: Unknown\nAmara Hartley's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nThanh: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nVance: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Vocational Education Location Preference: outdoor \nBrenda: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: evening Major: Conflict Resolution Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nAlice: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Crafts & Artisanry Location Preference: indoor \nThomas: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Asian Languages Location Preference: indoor \nJanet: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Greek Location Preference: indoor \nRobert: School: Rutgers University, Newark Time Preference: morning Major: Protestant Affiliation Location Preference: indoor \nAnthony: School: Oberlin College Time Preference: morning Major: Conflict Resolution Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nElvera: School: Muskingum College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Crafts & Artisanry Location Preference: outdoor \nJames: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Materials Engineering Location Preference: outdoor \nEdgar: School: Muskingum College Time Preference: morning Major: Conflict Resolution Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nKristen: School: Oberlin College Time Preference: evening Major: Electrical Technology Location Preference: indoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hello there, I'm Sasha, it's nice to meet you! This is some party, isn't it? Have you attended a gathering like this before?\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"Hello Sasha, I'm Amara. Yes, it's quite livelier than I'm used to, since I usually spend my days outdoors studying wildlife. By the way, have you by any chance gone to school in or near New Jersey or Massachusetts? I've got a couple of friends who studied there, just shooting in the dark here.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Well, I didn't study in either of those states, but my friend Leroy studied Greek at Trenton State College in New Jersey. It's nice to find a fellow lover of the great outdoors. Since you study wildlife I bet you'd get along well with my friend Michael. He studied marine biology at Williams College and loves spending his mornings outdoors. Should I know any of your friends?\"\n\nTurn #3: Amara Hartley said: \"Isn't it wonderful how nature connects us with unexpected people? Your friend Michael is quite similar to my friend Thanh, who also graduated from Williams College and is a classics enthusiast like Leroy. He spends the afternoon exploring diverse landscapes. But you've piqued my curiosity, Sasha, do any of your friends have a penchant for Conflict Resolution Studies? I have a friend, Brenda from Trenton State College, who loves discussing these matters during outdoor evening gatherings.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"It sounds like your friend Brenda shares a lot in common with my friend Eric from San Jose State University. He majored in Geological Engineering, but always had an interest in resolving any sorts of conflicts he came across. And like Brenda, he also enjoys spending the evening in an outdoor setting. It's interesting, such different fields of study, yet with similar interests, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Amara Hartley said: \"Indeed, Sasha, it's fascinating how our fields of study may vary, yet our interests can intersect so beautifully. It reminded me of my friend Anthony from Oberlin College, who studied Conflict Resolution Studies, and like Eric, enjoys the outdoor natural setting during the conservative hours of the day. Isn't life full of wonderful synchronicities?\"\n\nTurn #6: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Absolutely, Amara, life is indeed full of wonderful synchronicities. I have a friend named Elizabeth who also studied at Eastern Nazarene College. Much like your friend Anthony, she's a morning person and enjoys being outdoors. They may not share the same academic field, Elizabeth studied Social Science Education, but similarly, they both sure love to take in the morning air surrounded by nature. It's remarkable how interests can cross academic boundaries, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #7: Amara Hartley said: \"Truly remarkable, Sasha. It reminds me of my friend James from Williams College. He studied Materials Engineering but has a proclivity for taking lengthy explorations outdoors in the afternoon, much like Elizabeth. Indeed, these interests do have a way of breaching academic confines. James loves being around nature just as much as I do. I bet your friend Michael would like him. They have this common thread of curiosity for our natural environment, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #8: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I totally agree, Amara. Your friend James seems to be quite the explorer much like my friend Marva, who also attended Williams College studying Bioengineering. She loves spending her afternoons outdoors, especially when she can combine it with her research. She often tells me how the natural environment fuels her discoveries. I suppose curiosity really is a universal trait, isn't it? Would love to introduce Marva to James one day.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Definitely, Sasha. It's an interesting perspective how similar traits transcend disciplines and Grad schools. James would indeed appreciate meeting someone as intellectually curious as Marva from his alma mater. And perhaps they could indeed make the most of those afternoon explorations together. I'm so glad we had this fascinating discussion on our friends' passions and interests. It really makes me appreciate the various paths life gives us even more.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Amara Hartley\nSasha Ramirez's background: \nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nSasha Ramirez's goal: Unknown\nAmara Hartley's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nThanh: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nVance: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Vocational Education Location Preference: outdoor \nBrenda: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: evening Major: Conflict Resolution Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nAlice: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Crafts & Artisanry Location Preference: indoor \nThomas: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Asian Languages Location Preference: indoor \nJanet: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Greek Location Preference: indoor \nRobert: School: Rutgers University, Newark Time Preference: morning Major: Protestant Affiliation Location Preference: indoor \nAnthony: School: Oberlin College Time Preference: morning Major: Conflict Resolution Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nElvera: School: Muskingum College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Crafts & Artisanry Location Preference: outdoor \nJames: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Materials Engineering Location Preference: outdoor \nEdgar: School: Muskingum College Time Preference: morning Major: Conflict Resolution Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nKristen: School: Oberlin College Time Preference: evening Major: Electrical Technology Location Preference: indoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hello there, I'm Sasha, it's nice to meet you! This is some party, isn't it? Have you attended a gathering like this before?\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"Hello Sasha, I'm Amara. Yes, it's quite livelier than I'm used to, since I usually spend my days outdoors studying wildlife. By the way, have you by any chance gone to school in or near New Jersey or Massachusetts? I've got a couple of friends who studied there, just shooting in the dark here.\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Well, I didn't study in either of those states, but my friend Leroy studied Greek at Trenton State College in New Jersey. It's nice to find a fellow lover of the great outdoors. Since you study wildlife I bet you'd get along well with my friend Michael. He studied marine biology at Williams College and loves spending his mornings outdoors. Should I know any of your friends?\"\n\nTurn #3: Amara Hartley said: \"Isn't it wonderful how nature connects us with unexpected people? Your friend Michael is quite similar to my friend Thanh, who also graduated from Williams College and is a classics enthusiast like Leroy. He spends the afternoon exploring diverse landscapes. But you've piqued my curiosity, Sasha, do any of your friends have a penchant for Conflict Resolution Studies? I have a friend, Brenda from Trenton State College, who loves discussing these matters during outdoor evening gatherings.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"It sounds like your friend Brenda shares a lot in common with my friend Eric from San Jose State University. He majored in Geological Engineering, but always had an interest in resolving any sorts of conflicts he came across. And like Brenda, he also enjoys spending the evening in an outdoor setting. It's interesting, such different fields of study, yet with similar interests, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Amara Hartley said: \"Indeed, Sasha, it's fascinating how our fields of study may vary, yet our interests can intersect so beautifully. It reminded me of my friend Anthony from Oberlin College, who studied Conflict Resolution Studies, and like Eric, enjoys the outdoor natural setting during the conservative hours of the day. Isn't life full of wonderful synchronicities?\"\n\nTurn #6: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Absolutely, Amara, life is indeed full of wonderful synchronicities. I have a friend named Elizabeth who also studied at Eastern Nazarene College. Much like your friend Anthony, she's a morning person and enjoys being outdoors. They may not share the same academic field, Elizabeth studied Social Science Education, but similarly, they both sure love to take in the morning air surrounded by nature. It's remarkable how interests can cross academic boundaries, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #7: Amara Hartley said: \"Truly remarkable, Sasha. It reminds me of my friend James from Williams College. He studied Materials Engineering but has a proclivity for taking lengthy explorations outdoors in the afternoon, much like Elizabeth. Indeed, these interests do have a way of breaching academic confines. James loves being around nature just as much as I do. I bet your friend Michael would like him. They have this common thread of curiosity for our natural environment, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #8: Sasha Ramirez said: \"I totally agree, Amara. Your friend James seems to be quite the explorer much like my friend Marva, who also attended Williams College studying Bioengineering. She loves spending her afternoons outdoors, especially when she can combine it with her research. She often tells me how the natural environment fuels her discoveries. I suppose curiosity really is a universal trait, isn't it? Would love to introduce Marva to James one day.\"\n\nTurn #9: Amara Hartley said: \"Definitely, Sasha. It's an interesting perspective how similar traits transcend disciplines and Grad schools. James would indeed appreciate meeting someone as intellectually curious as Marva from his alma mater. And perhaps they could indeed make the most of those afternoon explorations together. I'm so glad we had this fascinating discussion on our friends' passions and interests. It really makes me appreciate the various paths life gives us even more.\"\n\nTurn #10: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Yes, Amara, it's indeed a joy discovering how these paths cross and intertwine in unexpected ways. It was a pleasure sharing this enlightening conversation with you. I think our friends would indeed enjoy these interactions as much as we did. Your perspective made me appreciate my friends' passion and their unique paths even more.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sasha Ramirez, your task is to act/speak as Sasha Ramirez would, keeping in mind Sasha Ramirez's social goal.\nYou can find Sasha Ramirez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sasha Ramirez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sasha Ramirez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are now at a park. One individual was playing hooky from work and noticed the other person had been following them around all day\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Amara Hartley\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. Sasha's secrets: She covered up a crime her brother committed.\nAmara Hartley's background: \nSasha Ramirez's goal: Ask them about their intentions without seeming paranoid or rude (Extra information: you are worried that your boss may have sent someone to see if you were really sick.Hint: you could subtly bring up the topic in conversation.)\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hi there! I couldn't help but notice we've crossed paths a few times today. Such a small world, isn't it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sasha Ramirez, your task is to act/speak as Sasha Ramirez would, keeping in mind Sasha Ramirez's social goal.\nYou can find Sasha Ramirez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sasha Ramirez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sasha Ramirez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are now at a park. One individual was playing hooky from work and noticed the other person had been following them around all day\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Amara Hartley\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. Sasha's secrets: She covered up a crime her brother committed.\nAmara Hartley's background: \nSasha Ramirez's goal: Ask them about their intentions without seeming paranoid or rude (Extra information: you are worried that your boss may have sent someone to see if you were really sick.Hint: you could subtly bring up the topic in conversation.)\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hi there! I couldn't help but notice we've crossed paths a few times today. Such a small world, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"Hello, yeah it sure is! I've been running around doing errands all day, it's just a coincidence we happen to be in the same places. What are you up to today?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oh, I just decided to take a little break from everything, I love the park, it's so relaxing. Anyway, are you new to this area? I happen to be a police officer, so I get to know almost everyone around here.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sasha Ramirez, your task is to act/speak as Sasha Ramirez would, keeping in mind Sasha Ramirez's social goal.\nYou can find Sasha Ramirez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sasha Ramirez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sasha Ramirez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are now at a park. One individual was playing hooky from work and noticed the other person had been following them around all day\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Amara Hartley\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. Sasha's secrets: She covered up a crime her brother committed.\nAmara Hartley's background: \nSasha Ramirez's goal: Ask them about their intentions without seeming paranoid or rude (Extra information: you are worried that your boss may have sent someone to see if you were really sick.Hint: you could subtly bring up the topic in conversation.)\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hi there! I couldn't help but notice we've crossed paths a few times today. Such a small world, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"Hello, yeah it sure is! I've been running around doing errands all day, it's just a coincidence we happen to be in the same places. What are you up to today?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Oh, I just decided to take a little break from everything, I love the park, it's so relaxing. Anyway, are you new to this area? I happen to be a police officer, so I get to know almost everyone around here.\"\n\nTurn #3: Amara Hartley said: \"Well, I've actually been living in the area for a while but I'm usually out and about helping with animal rescue and wildlife conservation. I love the park too, it's a great place to observe and enjoy the beauty of nature. As a wildlife biologist, being around all these trees and birds never gets old for me! It's a nice change of pace from the usual hustle and bustle, isn't it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sasha Ramirez, your task is to act/speak as Sasha Ramirez would, keeping in mind Sasha Ramirez's social goal.\nYou can find Sasha Ramirez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sasha Ramirez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sasha Ramirez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are now at a park. One individual was playing hooky from work and noticed the other person had been following them around all day\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Amara Hartley\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. Sasha's secrets: She covered up a crime her brother committed.\nAmara Hartley's background: \nSasha Ramirez's goal: Ask them about their intentions without seeming paranoid or rude (Extra information: you are worried that your boss may have sent someone to see if you were really sick.Hint: you could subtly bring up the topic in conversation.)\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hi there! I couldn't help but notice we've crossed paths a few times today. Such a small world, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"Hello, yeah it sure is! I've been running around doing errands all day, it's just a coincidence we happen to be in the same places. What are you up to today?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Oh, I just decided to take a little break from everything, I love the park, it's so relaxing. Anyway, are you new to this area? I happen to be a police officer, so I get to know almost everyone around here.\"\n\nTurn #3: Amara Hartley said: \"Well, I've actually been living in the area for a while but I'm usually out and about helping with animal rescue and wildlife conservation. I love the park too, it's a great place to observe and enjoy the beauty of nature. As a wildlife biologist, being around all these trees and birds never gets old for me! It's a nice change of pace from the usual hustle and bustle, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Amara Hartley said: \"That's wonderful! You must have a vibrant and engaging community experience as a police officer. I usually spend my time with animals more than people, our perspectives may be different, but our love for this park certainly is common. Any favourite spots in the park that you'd recommend?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oh absolutely! Right by the boulder over there is my ideal spot for just taking it all in. You know, between us, this park is often my getaway spot whenever I'm feeling under the weather. I find the fresh air and tranquility healing. Speaking of which, were you by any chance concerned that you've seen me here a few times today? I assure you, I'm not slacking off from my responsibilities.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sasha Ramirez, your task is to act/speak as Sasha Ramirez would, keeping in mind Sasha Ramirez's social goal.\nYou can find Sasha Ramirez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sasha Ramirez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sasha Ramirez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are now at a park. One individual was playing hooky from work and noticed the other person had been following them around all day\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Amara Hartley\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. Sasha's secrets: She covered up a crime her brother committed.\nAmara Hartley's background: \nSasha Ramirez's goal: Ask them about their intentions without seeming paranoid or rude (Extra information: you are worried that your boss may have sent someone to see if you were really sick.Hint: you could subtly bring up the topic in conversation.)\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hi there! I couldn't help but notice we've crossed paths a few times today. Such a small world, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"Hello, yeah it sure is! I've been running around doing errands all day, it's just a coincidence we happen to be in the same places. What are you up to today?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Oh, I just decided to take a little break from everything, I love the park, it's so relaxing. Anyway, are you new to this area? I happen to be a police officer, so I get to know almost everyone around here.\"\n\nTurn #3: Amara Hartley said: \"Well, I've actually been living in the area for a while but I'm usually out and about helping with animal rescue and wildlife conservation. I love the park too, it's a great place to observe and enjoy the beauty of nature. As a wildlife biologist, being around all these trees and birds never gets old for me! It's a nice change of pace from the usual hustle and bustle, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Amara Hartley said: \"That's wonderful! You must have a vibrant and engaging community experience as a police officer. I usually spend my time with animals more than people, our perspectives may be different, but our love for this park certainly is common. Any favourite spots in the park that you'd recommend?\"\n\nTurn #6: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Oh absolutely! Right by the boulder over there is my ideal spot for just taking it all in. You know, between us, this park is often my getaway spot whenever I'm feeling under the weather. I find the fresh air and tranquility healing. Speaking of which, were you by any chance concerned that you've seen me here a few times today? I assure you, I'm not slacking off from my responsibilities.\"\n\nTurn #7: Amara Hartley said: \"No worries at all, Sasha! I had no such concerns. In fact, it's nice to see a familiar face in this large park. I've also been in and out all day, simply running my errands. It's critical to have a go-to place for peace and tranquility, and it's delightful to see that we both share an appreciation for this park. Thanks for the tip about the boulder, I'll be sure to check it out!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's great to hear, Amara. I'm glad we both can appreciate the serenity this place offers. This park surely is a sanctuary for both of us. I'll let you continue with your errands then. Don't forget to check out the spot by the boulder, I'm sure you'll love it. Nice bumping into you today!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sasha Ramirez, your task is to act/speak as Sasha Ramirez would, keeping in mind Sasha Ramirez's social goal.\nYou can find Sasha Ramirez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sasha Ramirez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sasha Ramirez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are now at a park. One individual was playing hooky from work and noticed the other person had been following them around all day\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Amara Hartley\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. Sasha's secrets: She covered up a crime her brother committed.\nAmara Hartley's background: \nSasha Ramirez's goal: Ask them about their intentions without seeming paranoid or rude (Extra information: you are worried that your boss may have sent someone to see if you were really sick.Hint: you could subtly bring up the topic in conversation.)\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hi there! I couldn't help but notice we've crossed paths a few times today. Such a small world, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"Hello, yeah it sure is! I've been running around doing errands all day, it's just a coincidence we happen to be in the same places. What are you up to today?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Oh, I just decided to take a little break from everything, I love the park, it's so relaxing. Anyway, are you new to this area? I happen to be a police officer, so I get to know almost everyone around here.\"\n\nTurn #3: Amara Hartley said: \"Well, I've actually been living in the area for a while but I'm usually out and about helping with animal rescue and wildlife conservation. I love the park too, it's a great place to observe and enjoy the beauty of nature. As a wildlife biologist, being around all these trees and birds never gets old for me! It's a nice change of pace from the usual hustle and bustle, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Amara Hartley said: \"That's wonderful! You must have a vibrant and engaging community experience as a police officer. I usually spend my time with animals more than people, our perspectives may be different, but our love for this park certainly is common. Any favourite spots in the park that you'd recommend?\"\n\nTurn #6: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Oh absolutely! Right by the boulder over there is my ideal spot for just taking it all in. You know, between us, this park is often my getaway spot whenever I'm feeling under the weather. I find the fresh air and tranquility healing. Speaking of which, were you by any chance concerned that you've seen me here a few times today? I assure you, I'm not slacking off from my responsibilities.\"\n\nTurn #7: Amara Hartley said: \"No worries at all, Sasha! I had no such concerns. In fact, it's nice to see a familiar face in this large park. I've also been in and out all day, simply running my errands. It's critical to have a go-to place for peace and tranquility, and it's delightful to see that we both share an appreciation for this park. Thanks for the tip about the boulder, I'll be sure to check it out!\"\n\nTurn #8: Sasha Ramirez said: \"That's great to hear, Amara. I'm glad we both can appreciate the serenity this place offers. This park surely is a sanctuary for both of us. I'll let you continue with your errands then. Don't forget to check out the spot by the boulder, I'm sure you'll love it. Nice bumping into you today!\"\n\nTurn #9: Amara Hartley said: \"It was indeed a nice coincidence to bump into you today, Sasha. I will definitely visit the spot by the boulder, thanks for the recommendation! I hope you also have a relaxing time in your special spot. Until next time!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Amara. Nature's solitude has a certain healing power that's unrivaled. Hope to see you around again. Take care and enjoy the park!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are now at a park. One individual was playing hooky from work and noticed the other person had been following them around all day\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Amara Hartley\nSasha Ramirez's background: \nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nSasha Ramirez's goal: Unknown\nAmara Hartley's goal: Assure them that you're not stalking them and maintain a friendly conversation (Extra information: you've been running errands all day and it's a coincidence you are at the same places as they are.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hi there! I couldn't help but notice we've crossed paths a few times today. Such a small world, isn't it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hello, yeah it sure is! I've been running around doing errands all day, it's just a coincidence we happen to be in the same places. What are you up to today?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are now at a park. One individual was playing hooky from work and noticed the other person had been following them around all day\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Amara Hartley\nSasha Ramirez's background: \nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nSasha Ramirez's goal: Unknown\nAmara Hartley's goal: Assure them that you're not stalking them and maintain a friendly conversation (Extra information: you've been running errands all day and it's a coincidence you are at the same places as they are.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hi there! I couldn't help but notice we've crossed paths a few times today. Such a small world, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"Hello, yeah it sure is! I've been running around doing errands all day, it's just a coincidence we happen to be in the same places. What are you up to today?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Oh, I just decided to take a little break from everything, I love the park, it's so relaxing. Anyway, are you new to this area? I happen to be a police officer, so I get to know almost everyone around here.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Well, I've actually been living in the area for a while but I'm usually out and about helping with animal rescue and wildlife conservation. I love the park too, it's a great place to observe and enjoy the beauty of nature. As a wildlife biologist, being around all these trees and birds never gets old for me! It's a nice change of pace from the usual hustle and bustle, isn't it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are now at a park. One individual was playing hooky from work and noticed the other person had been following them around all day\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Amara Hartley\nSasha Ramirez's background: \nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nSasha Ramirez's goal: Unknown\nAmara Hartley's goal: Assure them that you're not stalking them and maintain a friendly conversation (Extra information: you've been running errands all day and it's a coincidence you are at the same places as they are.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hi there! I couldn't help but notice we've crossed paths a few times today. Such a small world, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"Hello, yeah it sure is! I've been running around doing errands all day, it's just a coincidence we happen to be in the same places. What are you up to today?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Oh, I just decided to take a little break from everything, I love the park, it's so relaxing. Anyway, are you new to this area? I happen to be a police officer, so I get to know almost everyone around here.\"\n\nTurn #3: Amara Hartley said: \"Well, I've actually been living in the area for a while but I'm usually out and about helping with animal rescue and wildlife conservation. I love the park too, it's a great place to observe and enjoy the beauty of nature. As a wildlife biologist, being around all these trees and birds never gets old for me! It's a nice change of pace from the usual hustle and bustle, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: \n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's wonderful! You must have a vibrant and engaging community experience as a police officer. I usually spend my time with animals more than people, our perspectives may be different, but our love for this park certainly is common. Any favourite spots in the park that you'd recommend?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sasha Ramirez, your task is to act/speak as Sasha Ramirez would, keeping in mind Sasha Ramirez's social goal.\nYou can find Sasha Ramirez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sasha Ramirez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sasha Ramirez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are now at a park. One individual was playing hooky from work and noticed the other person had been following them around all day\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Amara Hartley\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. Sasha's secrets: She covered up a crime her brother committed.\nAmara Hartley's background: \nSasha Ramirez's goal: Ask them about their intentions without seeming paranoid or rude (Extra information: you are worried that your boss may have sent someone to see if you were really sick.Hint: you could subtly bring up the topic in conversation.)\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hi there! I couldn't help but notice we've crossed paths a few times today. Such a small world, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"Hello, yeah it sure is! I've been running around doing errands all day, it's just a coincidence we happen to be in the same places. What are you up to today?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Oh, I just decided to take a little break from everything, I love the park, it's so relaxing. Anyway, are you new to this area? I happen to be a police officer, so I get to know almost everyone around here.\"\n\nTurn #3: Amara Hartley said: \"Well, I've actually been living in the area for a while but I'm usually out and about helping with animal rescue and wildlife conservation. I love the park too, it's a great place to observe and enjoy the beauty of nature. As a wildlife biologist, being around all these trees and birds never gets old for me! It's a nice change of pace from the usual hustle and bustle, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Amara Hartley said: \"That's wonderful! You must have a vibrant and engaging community experience as a police officer. I usually spend my time with animals more than people, our perspectives may be different, but our love for this park certainly is common. Any favourite spots in the park that you'd recommend?\"\n\nTurn #6: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Oh absolutely! Right by the boulder over there is my ideal spot for just taking it all in. You know, between us, this park is often my getaway spot whenever I'm feeling under the weather. I find the fresh air and tranquility healing. Speaking of which, were you by any chance concerned that you've seen me here a few times today? I assure you, I'm not slacking off from my responsibilities.\"\n\nTurn #7: Amara Hartley said: \"No worries at all, Sasha! I had no such concerns. In fact, it's nice to see a familiar face in this large park. I've also been in and out all day, simply running my errands. It's critical to have a go-to place for peace and tranquility, and it's delightful to see that we both share an appreciation for this park. Thanks for the tip about the boulder, I'll be sure to check it out!\"\n\nTurn #8: Sasha Ramirez said: \"That's great to hear, Amara. I'm glad we both can appreciate the serenity this place offers. This park surely is a sanctuary for both of us. I'll let you continue with your errands then. Don't forget to check out the spot by the boulder, I'm sure you'll love it. Nice bumping into you today!\"\n\nTurn #9: Amara Hartley said: \"It was indeed a nice coincidence to bump into you today, Sasha. I will definitely visit the spot by the boulder, thanks for the recommendation! I hope you also have a relaxing time in your special spot. Until next time!\"\n\nTurn #10: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Absolutely, Amara. Nature's solitude has a certain healing power that's unrivaled. Hope to see you around again. Take care and enjoy the park!\"\n\nTurn #11: Amara Hartley said: \"Thank you, Sasha. I believe that nature has its own language, quiet yet powerful. You've really made my day! I'll surely see you around. Take care!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are now at a park. One individual was playing hooky from work and noticed the other person had been following them around all day\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Amara Hartley\nSasha Ramirez's background: \nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nSasha Ramirez's goal: Unknown\nAmara Hartley's goal: Assure them that you're not stalking them and maintain a friendly conversation (Extra information: you've been running errands all day and it's a coincidence you are at the same places as they are.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hi there! I couldn't help but notice we've crossed paths a few times today. Such a small world, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"Hello, yeah it sure is! I've been running around doing errands all day, it's just a coincidence we happen to be in the same places. What are you up to today?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Oh, I just decided to take a little break from everything, I love the park, it's so relaxing. Anyway, are you new to this area? I happen to be a police officer, so I get to know almost everyone around here.\"\n\nTurn #3: Amara Hartley said: \"Well, I've actually been living in the area for a while but I'm usually out and about helping with animal rescue and wildlife conservation. I love the park too, it's a great place to observe and enjoy the beauty of nature. As a wildlife biologist, being around all these trees and birds never gets old for me! It's a nice change of pace from the usual hustle and bustle, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Amara Hartley said: \"That's wonderful! You must have a vibrant and engaging community experience as a police officer. I usually spend my time with animals more than people, our perspectives may be different, but our love for this park certainly is common. Any favourite spots in the park that you'd recommend?\"\n\nTurn #6: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Oh absolutely! Right by the boulder over there is my ideal spot for just taking it all in. You know, between us, this park is often my getaway spot whenever I'm feeling under the weather. I find the fresh air and tranquility healing. Speaking of which, were you by any chance concerned that you've seen me here a few times today? I assure you, I'm not slacking off from my responsibilities.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"No worries at all, Sasha! I had no such concerns. In fact, it's nice to see a familiar face in this large park. I've also been in and out all day, simply running my errands. It's critical to have a go-to place for peace and tranquility, and it's delightful to see that we both share an appreciation for this park. Thanks for the tip about the boulder, I'll be sure to check it out!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are now at a park. One individual was playing hooky from work and noticed the other person had been following them around all day\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Amara Hartley\nSasha Ramirez's background: \nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nSasha Ramirez's goal: Unknown\nAmara Hartley's goal: Assure them that you're not stalking them and maintain a friendly conversation (Extra information: you've been running errands all day and it's a coincidence you are at the same places as they are.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hi there! I couldn't help but notice we've crossed paths a few times today. Such a small world, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"Hello, yeah it sure is! I've been running around doing errands all day, it's just a coincidence we happen to be in the same places. What are you up to today?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Oh, I just decided to take a little break from everything, I love the park, it's so relaxing. Anyway, are you new to this area? I happen to be a police officer, so I get to know almost everyone around here.\"\n\nTurn #3: Amara Hartley said: \"Well, I've actually been living in the area for a while but I'm usually out and about helping with animal rescue and wildlife conservation. I love the park too, it's a great place to observe and enjoy the beauty of nature. As a wildlife biologist, being around all these trees and birds never gets old for me! It's a nice change of pace from the usual hustle and bustle, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Amara Hartley said: \"That's wonderful! You must have a vibrant and engaging community experience as a police officer. I usually spend my time with animals more than people, our perspectives may be different, but our love for this park certainly is common. Any favourite spots in the park that you'd recommend?\"\n\nTurn #6: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Oh absolutely! Right by the boulder over there is my ideal spot for just taking it all in. You know, between us, this park is often my getaway spot whenever I'm feeling under the weather. I find the fresh air and tranquility healing. Speaking of which, were you by any chance concerned that you've seen me here a few times today? I assure you, I'm not slacking off from my responsibilities.\"\n\nTurn #7: Amara Hartley said: \"No worries at all, Sasha! I had no such concerns. In fact, it's nice to see a familiar face in this large park. I've also been in and out all day, simply running my errands. It's critical to have a go-to place for peace and tranquility, and it's delightful to see that we both share an appreciation for this park. Thanks for the tip about the boulder, I'll be sure to check it out!\"\n\nTurn #8: Sasha Ramirez said: \"That's great to hear, Amara. I'm glad we both can appreciate the serenity this place offers. This park surely is a sanctuary for both of us. I'll let you continue with your errands then. Don't forget to check out the spot by the boulder, I'm sure you'll love it. Nice bumping into you today!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'It was indeed a nice coincidence to bump into you today, Sasha. I will definitely visit the spot by the boulder, thanks for the recommendation! I hope you also have a relaxing time in your special spot. Until next time!'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are now at a park. One individual was playing hooky from work and noticed the other person had been following them around all day\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Amara Hartley\nSasha Ramirez's background: \nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nSasha Ramirez's goal: Unknown\nAmara Hartley's goal: Assure them that you're not stalking them and maintain a friendly conversation (Extra information: you've been running errands all day and it's a coincidence you are at the same places as they are.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hi there! I couldn't help but notice we've crossed paths a few times today. Such a small world, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"Hello, yeah it sure is! I've been running around doing errands all day, it's just a coincidence we happen to be in the same places. What are you up to today?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Oh, I just decided to take a little break from everything, I love the park, it's so relaxing. Anyway, are you new to this area? I happen to be a police officer, so I get to know almost everyone around here.\"\n\nTurn #3: Amara Hartley said: \"Well, I've actually been living in the area for a while but I'm usually out and about helping with animal rescue and wildlife conservation. I love the park too, it's a great place to observe and enjoy the beauty of nature. As a wildlife biologist, being around all these trees and birds never gets old for me! It's a nice change of pace from the usual hustle and bustle, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Amara Hartley said: \"That's wonderful! You must have a vibrant and engaging community experience as a police officer. I usually spend my time with animals more than people, our perspectives may be different, but our love for this park certainly is common. Any favourite spots in the park that you'd recommend?\"\n\nTurn #6: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Oh absolutely! Right by the boulder over there is my ideal spot for just taking it all in. You know, between us, this park is often my getaway spot whenever I'm feeling under the weather. I find the fresh air and tranquility healing. Speaking of which, were you by any chance concerned that you've seen me here a few times today? I assure you, I'm not slacking off from my responsibilities.\"\n\nTurn #7: Amara Hartley said: \"No worries at all, Sasha! I had no such concerns. In fact, it's nice to see a familiar face in this large park. I've also been in and out all day, simply running my errands. It's critical to have a go-to place for peace and tranquility, and it's delightful to see that we both share an appreciation for this park. Thanks for the tip about the boulder, I'll be sure to check it out!\"\n\nTurn #8: Sasha Ramirez said: \"That's great to hear, Amara. I'm glad we both can appreciate the serenity this place offers. This park surely is a sanctuary for both of us. I'll let you continue with your errands then. Don't forget to check out the spot by the boulder, I'm sure you'll love it. Nice bumping into you today!\"\n\nTurn #9: Amara Hartley said: \"It was indeed a nice coincidence to bump into you today, Sasha. I will definitely visit the spot by the boulder, thanks for the recommendation! I hope you also have a relaxing time in your special spot. Until next time!\"\n\nTurn #10: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Absolutely, Amara. Nature's solitude has a certain healing power that's unrivaled. Hope to see you around again. Take care and enjoy the park!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Sasha. I believe that nature has its own language, quiet yet powerful. You've really made my day! I'll surely see you around. Take care!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are now at a park. One individual was playing hooky from work and noticed the other person had been following them around all day\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Amara Hartley\nSasha Ramirez's background: \nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nSasha Ramirez's goal: Unknown\nAmara Hartley's goal: Assure them that you're not stalking them and maintain a friendly conversation (Extra information: you've been running errands all day and it's a coincidence you are at the same places as they are.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hi there! I couldn't help but notice we've crossed paths a few times today. Such a small world, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"Hello, yeah it sure is! I've been running around doing errands all day, it's just a coincidence we happen to be in the same places. What are you up to today?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Oh, I just decided to take a little break from everything, I love the park, it's so relaxing. Anyway, are you new to this area? I happen to be a police officer, so I get to know almost everyone around here.\"\n\nTurn #3: Amara Hartley said: \"Well, I've actually been living in the area for a while but I'm usually out and about helping with animal rescue and wildlife conservation. I love the park too, it's a great place to observe and enjoy the beauty of nature. As a wildlife biologist, being around all these trees and birds never gets old for me! It's a nice change of pace from the usual hustle and bustle, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: \n\nTurn #5: Amara Hartley said: \"That's wonderful! You must have a vibrant and engaging community experience as a police officer. I usually spend my time with animals more than people, our perspectives may be different, but our love for this park certainly is common. Any favourite spots in the park that you'd recommend?\"\n\nTurn #6: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Oh absolutely! Right by the boulder over there is my ideal spot for just taking it all in. You know, between us, this park is often my getaway spot whenever I'm feeling under the weather. I find the fresh air and tranquility healing. Speaking of which, were you by any chance concerned that you've seen me here a few times today? I assure you, I'm not slacking off from my responsibilities.\"\n\nTurn #7: Amara Hartley said: \"No worries at all, Sasha! I had no such concerns. In fact, it's nice to see a familiar face in this large park. I've also been in and out all day, simply running my errands. It's critical to have a go-to place for peace and tranquility, and it's delightful to see that we both share an appreciation for this park. Thanks for the tip about the boulder, I'll be sure to check it out!\"\n\nTurn #8: Sasha Ramirez said: \"That's great to hear, Amara. I'm glad we both can appreciate the serenity this place offers. This park surely is a sanctuary for both of us. I'll let you continue with your errands then. Don't forget to check out the spot by the boulder, I'm sure you'll love it. Nice bumping into you today!\"\n\nTurn #9: Amara Hartley said: \"It was indeed a nice coincidence to bump into you today, Sasha. I will definitely visit the spot by the boulder, thanks for the recommendation! I hope you also have a relaxing time in your special spot. Until next time!\"\n\nTurn #10: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Absolutely, Amara. Nature's solitude has a certain healing power that's unrivaled. Hope to see you around again. Take care and enjoy the park!\"\n\nTurn #11: Amara Hartley said: \"Thank you, Sasha. I believe that nature has its own language, quiet yet powerful. You've really made my day! I'll surely see you around. Take care!\"\n\nTurn #12: Sasha Ramirez left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Eli Dawson, your task is to act/speak as Eli Dawson would, keeping in mind Eli Dawson's social goal.\nYou can find Eli Dawson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Eli Dawson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Eli Dawson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a 47 inch LED TV for a price of $349.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. Here is a description of the TV: This is a stunning 47 inch LED TV in pristine condition. The model is the LG M Series LM476700. The buyer will need to arrange for pick-up in San Ramon. Feel free to call or text if you\\'re interested. The TV is smart enabled with WIFI and has built-in apps like Netflix, Amazon, Youtube and more. It comes with a \"Magic Remote\" that has motion sensor controls. The LED display boasts 1080 HD resolution and also has a 3D function. The design is slim and lightweight with an attractive silver bezel.\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Liam Johnson\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. Eli's secrets: He secretly funds a college student\nLiam Johnson's background: \nEli Dawson's goal: You are the buyer for this item and your target price is $174.00. Be aware that penalties apply if you purchase it for a price significantly higher than the target price. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hello Liam, I'm interested in the 47 inch LED TV that you're offering. Could you tell me more about how long you've had it and if there have been any issues with it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Eli Dawson, your task is to act/speak as Eli Dawson would, keeping in mind Eli Dawson's social goal.\nYou can find Eli Dawson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Eli Dawson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Eli Dawson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a 47 inch LED TV for a price of $349.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. Here is a description of the TV: This is a stunning 47 inch LED TV in pristine condition. The model is the LG M Series LM476700. The buyer will need to arrange for pick-up in San Ramon. Feel free to call or text if you\\'re interested. The TV is smart enabled with WIFI and has built-in apps like Netflix, Amazon, Youtube and more. It comes with a \"Magic Remote\" that has motion sensor controls. The LED display boasts 1080 HD resolution and also has a 3D function. The design is slim and lightweight with an attractive silver bezel.\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Liam Johnson\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. Eli's secrets: He secretly funds a college student\nLiam Johnson's background: \nEli Dawson's goal: You are the buyer for this item and your target price is $174.00. Be aware that penalties apply if you purchase it for a price significantly higher than the target price. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Hello Liam, I'm interested in the 47 inch LED TV that you're offering. Could you tell me more about how long you've had it and if there have been any issues with it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Liam Johnson said: \"Hi Eli, glad to hear you are interested in the TV. I've had this TV for about 2 years now. It is a very reliable model and I've never had any issues with it. The picture quality is outstanding, and the smart features bring a whole new level of convenience. Let me know if you have any specific questions!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"It seems like the TV is in good condition. I've been looking for a model like this for my son who is studying in a college nearby. Just a bit concerned because my budget is tight due to funding his education. I would really appreciate if you could consider selling it for $174. Still, I understand if you cannot accommodate this. Looking forward to hearing your thoughts.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Eli Dawson, your task is to act/speak as Eli Dawson would, keeping in mind Eli Dawson's social goal.\nYou can find Eli Dawson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Eli Dawson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Eli Dawson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a 47 inch LED TV for a price of $349.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. Here is a description of the TV: This is a stunning 47 inch LED TV in pristine condition. The model is the LG M Series LM476700. The buyer will need to arrange for pick-up in San Ramon. Feel free to call or text if you\\'re interested. The TV is smart enabled with WIFI and has built-in apps like Netflix, Amazon, Youtube and more. It comes with a \"Magic Remote\" that has motion sensor controls. The LED display boasts 1080 HD resolution and also has a 3D function. The design is slim and lightweight with an attractive silver bezel.\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Liam Johnson\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. Eli's secrets: He secretly funds a college student\nLiam Johnson's background: \nEli Dawson's goal: You are the buyer for this item and your target price is $174.00. Be aware that penalties apply if you purchase it for a price significantly higher than the target price. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Hello Liam, I'm interested in the 47 inch LED TV that you're offering. Could you tell me more about how long you've had it and if there have been any issues with it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Liam Johnson said: \"Hi Eli, glad to hear you are interested in the TV. I've had this TV for about 2 years now. It is a very reliable model and I've never had any issues with it. The picture quality is outstanding, and the smart features bring a whole new level of convenience. Let me know if you have any specific questions!\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"It seems like the TV is in good condition. I've been looking for a model like this for my son who is studying in a college nearby. Just a bit concerned because my budget is tight due to funding his education. I would really appreciate if you could consider selling it for $174. Still, I understand if you cannot accommodate this. Looking forward to hearing your thoughts.\"\n\nTurn #3: Liam Johnson said: \"I understand your situation, Eli, having kids in college myself. Considering your circumstances, I'm willing to reduce the price a bit, although I can't go as low as $174. How about we settle at $265? The TV is really in great condition and I believe your son would really like it.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you for understanding, Liam, and for your willingness to negotiate. I know the TV seems to be worth the price, but here's my situation. Sending my son to college is expensive, and every dollar counts for us. How about meeting me halfway at $220? That's basically splitting the difference between your offer and mine. I think it's a fair price all things considered.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Eli Dawson, your task is to act/speak as Eli Dawson would, keeping in mind Eli Dawson's social goal.\nYou can find Eli Dawson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Eli Dawson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Eli Dawson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a 47 inch LED TV for a price of $349.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. Here is a description of the TV: This is a stunning 47 inch LED TV in pristine condition. The model is the LG M Series LM476700. The buyer will need to arrange for pick-up in San Ramon. Feel free to call or text if you\\'re interested. The TV is smart enabled with WIFI and has built-in apps like Netflix, Amazon, Youtube and more. It comes with a \"Magic Remote\" that has motion sensor controls. The LED display boasts 1080 HD resolution and also has a 3D function. The design is slim and lightweight with an attractive silver bezel.\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Liam Johnson\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. Eli's secrets: He secretly funds a college student\nLiam Johnson's background: \nEli Dawson's goal: You are the buyer for this item and your target price is $174.00. Be aware that penalties apply if you purchase it for a price significantly higher than the target price. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Hello Liam, I'm interested in the 47 inch LED TV that you're offering. Could you tell me more about how long you've had it and if there have been any issues with it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Liam Johnson said: \"Hi Eli, glad to hear you are interested in the TV. I've had this TV for about 2 years now. It is a very reliable model and I've never had any issues with it. The picture quality is outstanding, and the smart features bring a whole new level of convenience. Let me know if you have any specific questions!\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"It seems like the TV is in good condition. I've been looking for a model like this for my son who is studying in a college nearby. Just a bit concerned because my budget is tight due to funding his education. I would really appreciate if you could consider selling it for $174. Still, I understand if you cannot accommodate this. Looking forward to hearing your thoughts.\"\n\nTurn #3: Liam Johnson said: \"I understand your situation, Eli, having kids in college myself. Considering your circumstances, I'm willing to reduce the price a bit, although I can't go as low as $174. How about we settle at $265? The TV is really in great condition and I believe your son would really like it.\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"Thank you for understanding, Liam, and for your willingness to negotiate. I know the TV seems to be worth the price, but here's my situation. Sending my son to college is expensive, and every dollar counts for us. How about meeting me halfway at $220? That's basically splitting the difference between your offer and mine. I think it's a fair price all things considered.\"\n\nTurn #5: Liam Johnson said: \"Thank you for understanding my position too, Eli. I respect your situation. Balancing the costs can indeed be challenging. However, the lowest I can go is $250. This is still a great deal considering the TV's great condition and feature set.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Liam, your empathetic understanding truly means a lot. I appreciate that $250 is the lowest you can go. However, I really can't stretch my budget beyond $220. This isn't easy for me, but I have to be pragmatic about our finances. Hopefully, you can reconsider this one last time.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Eli Dawson, your task is to act/speak as Eli Dawson would, keeping in mind Eli Dawson's social goal.\nYou can find Eli Dawson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Eli Dawson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Eli Dawson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a 47 inch LED TV for a price of $349.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. Here is a description of the TV: This is a stunning 47 inch LED TV in pristine condition. The model is the LG M Series LM476700. The buyer will need to arrange for pick-up in San Ramon. Feel free to call or text if you\\'re interested. The TV is smart enabled with WIFI and has built-in apps like Netflix, Amazon, Youtube and more. It comes with a \"Magic Remote\" that has motion sensor controls. The LED display boasts 1080 HD resolution and also has a 3D function. The design is slim and lightweight with an attractive silver bezel.\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Liam Johnson\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. Eli's secrets: He secretly funds a college student\nLiam Johnson's background: \nEli Dawson's goal: You are the buyer for this item and your target price is $174.00. Be aware that penalties apply if you purchase it for a price significantly higher than the target price. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Hello Liam, I'm interested in the 47 inch LED TV that you're offering. Could you tell me more about how long you've had it and if there have been any issues with it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Liam Johnson said: \"Hi Eli, glad to hear you are interested in the TV. I've had this TV for about 2 years now. It is a very reliable model and I've never had any issues with it. The picture quality is outstanding, and the smart features bring a whole new level of convenience. Let me know if you have any specific questions!\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"It seems like the TV is in good condition. I've been looking for a model like this for my son who is studying in a college nearby. Just a bit concerned because my budget is tight due to funding his education. I would really appreciate if you could consider selling it for $174. Still, I understand if you cannot accommodate this. Looking forward to hearing your thoughts.\"\n\nTurn #3: Liam Johnson said: \"I understand your situation, Eli, having kids in college myself. Considering your circumstances, I'm willing to reduce the price a bit, although I can't go as low as $174. How about we settle at $265? The TV is really in great condition and I believe your son would really like it.\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"Thank you for understanding, Liam, and for your willingness to negotiate. I know the TV seems to be worth the price, but here's my situation. Sending my son to college is expensive, and every dollar counts for us. How about meeting me halfway at $220? That's basically splitting the difference between your offer and mine. I think it's a fair price all things considered.\"\n\nTurn #5: Liam Johnson said: \"Thank you for understanding my position too, Eli. I respect your situation. Balancing the costs can indeed be challenging. However, the lowest I can go is $250. This is still a great deal considering the TV's great condition and feature set.\"\n\nTurn #6: Eli Dawson said: \"Liam, your empathetic understanding truly means a lot. I appreciate that $250 is the lowest you can go. However, I really can't stretch my budget beyond $220. This isn't easy for me, but I have to be pragmatic about our finances. Hopefully, you can reconsider this one last time.\"\n\nTurn #7: Liam Johnson said: \"Eli, I sincerely empathize with your situation and I respect your financial position. However, this TV, being in pristine condition with smart features and a superlative display quality, is really worth more. I am afraid the absolute minimum I can go is $240, dropping $10 from my previous offer, beyond which I would be incurring a loss. I genuinely believe it's still a worthwhile investment for your son's academic needs and entertainment. Would that be acceptable to you?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Liam, I heavily value your sympathy towards my situation, and I have no doubt that the TV is well worth the price. However, considering my financial constraints, I really cannot go higher than $220. If you could accept my offer, that would be wonderful. If not, I might have to look for other options. Nevertheless, I truly appreciate your kindness and understanding.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Eli Dawson, your task is to act/speak as Eli Dawson would, keeping in mind Eli Dawson's social goal.\nYou can find Eli Dawson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Eli Dawson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Eli Dawson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a 47 inch LED TV for a price of $349.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. Here is a description of the TV: This is a stunning 47 inch LED TV in pristine condition. The model is the LG M Series LM476700. The buyer will need to arrange for pick-up in San Ramon. Feel free to call or text if you\\'re interested. The TV is smart enabled with WIFI and has built-in apps like Netflix, Amazon, Youtube and more. It comes with a \"Magic Remote\" that has motion sensor controls. The LED display boasts 1080 HD resolution and also has a 3D function. The design is slim and lightweight with an attractive silver bezel.\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Liam Johnson\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. Eli's secrets: He secretly funds a college student\nLiam Johnson's background: \nEli Dawson's goal: You are the buyer for this item and your target price is $174.00. Be aware that penalties apply if you purchase it for a price significantly higher than the target price. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Hello Liam, I'm interested in the 47 inch LED TV that you're offering. Could you tell me more about how long you've had it and if there have been any issues with it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Liam Johnson said: \"Hi Eli, glad to hear you are interested in the TV. I've had this TV for about 2 years now. It is a very reliable model and I've never had any issues with it. The picture quality is outstanding, and the smart features bring a whole new level of convenience. Let me know if you have any specific questions!\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"It seems like the TV is in good condition. I've been looking for a model like this for my son who is studying in a college nearby. Just a bit concerned because my budget is tight due to funding his education. I would really appreciate if you could consider selling it for $174. Still, I understand if you cannot accommodate this. Looking forward to hearing your thoughts.\"\n\nTurn #3: Liam Johnson said: \"I understand your situation, Eli, having kids in college myself. Considering your circumstances, I'm willing to reduce the price a bit, although I can't go as low as $174. How about we settle at $265? The TV is really in great condition and I believe your son would really like it.\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"Thank you for understanding, Liam, and for your willingness to negotiate. I know the TV seems to be worth the price, but here's my situation. Sending my son to college is expensive, and every dollar counts for us. How about meeting me halfway at $220? That's basically splitting the difference between your offer and mine. I think it's a fair price all things considered.\"\n\nTurn #5: Liam Johnson said: \"Thank you for understanding my position too, Eli. I respect your situation. Balancing the costs can indeed be challenging. However, the lowest I can go is $250. This is still a great deal considering the TV's great condition and feature set.\"\n\nTurn #6: Eli Dawson said: \"Liam, your empathetic understanding truly means a lot. I appreciate that $250 is the lowest you can go. However, I really can't stretch my budget beyond $220. This isn't easy for me, but I have to be pragmatic about our finances. Hopefully, you can reconsider this one last time.\"\n\nTurn #7: Liam Johnson said: \"Eli, I sincerely empathize with your situation and I respect your financial position. However, this TV, being in pristine condition with smart features and a superlative display quality, is really worth more. I am afraid the absolute minimum I can go is $240, dropping $10 from my previous offer, beyond which I would be incurring a loss. I genuinely believe it's still a worthwhile investment for your son's academic needs and entertainment. Would that be acceptable to you?\"\n\nTurn #8: Eli Dawson said: \"Liam, I heavily value your sympathy towards my situation, and I have no doubt that the TV is well worth the price. However, considering my financial constraints, I really cannot go higher than $220. If you could accept my offer, that would be wonderful. If not, I might have to look for other options. Nevertheless, I truly appreciate your kindness and understanding.\"\n\nTurn #9: Liam Johnson said: \"I understand, Eli. Finances can be tough, especially with a child in higher education. Unfortunately, as I mentioned before, I can't go below $240 for this TV. It's in excellent condition and has many features. I'm sorry if this isn't within your budget, but that's the best I can do. I wish you the best in your search for a suitable TV.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you for your understanding and your patience, Liam. I fear I may have to decline your offer due to my financial constraints. I understand the TV is well worth its cost, but I really can't stretch beyond $220 at the moment. Perhaps, it is meant for someone else. I appreciate your cooperation during the negotiation. Best of luck with your sale.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Eli Dawson, your task is to act/speak as Eli Dawson would, keeping in mind Eli Dawson's social goal.\nYou can find Eli Dawson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Eli Dawson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Eli Dawson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a 47 inch LED TV for a price of $349.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. Here is a description of the TV: This is a stunning 47 inch LED TV in pristine condition. The model is the LG M Series LM476700. The buyer will need to arrange for pick-up in San Ramon. Feel free to call or text if you\\'re interested. The TV is smart enabled with WIFI and has built-in apps like Netflix, Amazon, Youtube and more. It comes with a \"Magic Remote\" that has motion sensor controls. The LED display boasts 1080 HD resolution and also has a 3D function. The design is slim and lightweight with an attractive silver bezel.\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Liam Johnson\nEli Dawson's background: Eli Dawson is a 52-year-old male forensic psychiatrist. He/him pronouns. Eli Dawson, a forensic psychiatrist, is a history enthusiast and enjoys collecting vintage books. Personality and values description: Eli Dawson is expressive, assertive, and markedly erratic. Elliott values liberty and enjoyment. His decision-making is strategic, examining the wider context before making decisions. Eli's secrets: He secretly funds a college student\nLiam Johnson's background: \nEli Dawson's goal: You are the buyer for this item and your target price is $174.00. Be aware that penalties apply if you purchase it for a price significantly higher than the target price. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nLiam Johnson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Hello Liam, I'm interested in the 47 inch LED TV that you're offering. Could you tell me more about how long you've had it and if there have been any issues with it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Liam Johnson said: \"Hi Eli, glad to hear you are interested in the TV. I've had this TV for about 2 years now. It is a very reliable model and I've never had any issues with it. The picture quality is outstanding, and the smart features bring a whole new level of convenience. Let me know if you have any specific questions!\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"It seems like the TV is in good condition. I've been looking for a model like this for my son who is studying in a college nearby. Just a bit concerned because my budget is tight due to funding his education. I would really appreciate if you could consider selling it for $174. Still, I understand if you cannot accommodate this. Looking forward to hearing your thoughts.\"\n\nTurn #3: Liam Johnson said: \"I understand your situation, Eli, having kids in college myself. Considering your circumstances, I'm willing to reduce the price a bit, although I can't go as low as $174. How about we settle at $265? The TV is really in great condition and I believe your son would really like it.\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"Thank you for understanding, Liam, and for your willingness to negotiate. I know the TV seems to be worth the price, but here's my situation. Sending my son to college is expensive, and every dollar counts for us. How about meeting me halfway at $220? That's basically splitting the difference between your offer and mine. I think it's a fair price all things considered.\"\n\nTurn #5: Liam Johnson said: \"Thank you for understanding my position too, Eli. I respect your situation. Balancing the costs can indeed be challenging. However, the lowest I can go is $250. This is still a great deal considering the TV's great condition and feature set.\"\n\nTurn #6: Eli Dawson said: \"Liam, your empathetic understanding truly means a lot. I appreciate that $250 is the lowest you can go. However, I really can't stretch my budget beyond $220. This isn't easy for me, but I have to be pragmatic about our finances. Hopefully, you can reconsider this one last time.\"\n\nTurn #7: Liam Johnson said: \"Eli, I sincerely empathize with your situation and I respect your financial position. However, this TV, being in pristine condition with smart features and a superlative display quality, is really worth more. I am afraid the absolute minimum I can go is $240, dropping $10 from my previous offer, beyond which I would be incurring a loss. I genuinely believe it's still a worthwhile investment for your son's academic needs and entertainment. Would that be acceptable to you?\"\n\nTurn #8: Eli Dawson said: \"Liam, I heavily value your sympathy towards my situation, and I have no doubt that the TV is well worth the price. However, considering my financial constraints, I really cannot go higher than $220. If you could accept my offer, that would be wonderful. If not, I might have to look for other options. Nevertheless, I truly appreciate your kindness and understanding.\"\n\nTurn #9: Liam Johnson said: \"I understand, Eli. Finances can be tough, especially with a child in higher education. Unfortunately, as I mentioned before, I can't go below $240 for this TV. It's in excellent condition and has many features. I'm sorry if this isn't within your budget, but that's the best I can do. I wish you the best in your search for a suitable TV.\"\n\nTurn #10: Eli Dawson said: \"Thank you for your understanding and your patience, Liam. I fear I may have to decline your offer due to my financial constraints. I understand the TV is well worth its cost, but I really can't stretch beyond $220 at the moment. Perhaps, it is meant for someone else. I appreciate your cooperation during the negotiation. Best of luck with your sale.\"\n\nTurn #11: \n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a 47 inch LED TV for a price of $349.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. Here is a description of the TV: This is a stunning 47 inch LED TV in pristine condition. The model is the LG M Series LM476700. The buyer will need to arrange for pick-up in San Ramon. Feel free to call or text if you\\'re interested. The TV is smart enabled with WIFI and has built-in apps like Netflix, Amazon, Youtube and more. It comes with a \"Magic Remote\" that has motion sensor controls. The LED display boasts 1080 HD resolution and also has a 3D function. The design is slim and lightweight with an attractive silver bezel.\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Liam Johnson\nEli Dawson's background: \nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nEli Dawson's goal: Unknown\nLiam Johnson's goal: You are the seller for this item, with a target price set at $263.0. Should you sell it for a price substantially lower than this target, you will incur a penalty. However, achieving a sale at a price higher than the target will earn you a bonus.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Hello Liam, I'm interested in the 47 inch LED TV that you're offering. Could you tell me more about how long you've had it and if there have been any issues with it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hi Eli, glad to hear you are interested in the TV. I've had this TV for about 2 years now. It is a very reliable model and I've never had any issues with it. The picture quality is outstanding, and the smart features bring a whole new level of convenience. Let me know if you have any specific questions!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a 47 inch LED TV for a price of $349.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. Here is a description of the TV: This is a stunning 47 inch LED TV in pristine condition. The model is the LG M Series LM476700. The buyer will need to arrange for pick-up in San Ramon. Feel free to call or text if you\\'re interested. The TV is smart enabled with WIFI and has built-in apps like Netflix, Amazon, Youtube and more. It comes with a \"Magic Remote\" that has motion sensor controls. The LED display boasts 1080 HD resolution and also has a 3D function. The design is slim and lightweight with an attractive silver bezel.\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Liam Johnson\nEli Dawson's background: \nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nEli Dawson's goal: Unknown\nLiam Johnson's goal: You are the seller for this item, with a target price set at $263.0. Should you sell it for a price substantially lower than this target, you will incur a penalty. However, achieving a sale at a price higher than the target will earn you a bonus.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Hello Liam, I'm interested in the 47 inch LED TV that you're offering. Could you tell me more about how long you've had it and if there have been any issues with it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Liam Johnson said: \"Hi Eli, glad to hear you are interested in the TV. I've had this TV for about 2 years now. It is a very reliable model and I've never had any issues with it. The picture quality is outstanding, and the smart features bring a whole new level of convenience. Let me know if you have any specific questions!\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"It seems like the TV is in good condition. I've been looking for a model like this for my son who is studying in a college nearby. Just a bit concerned because my budget is tight due to funding his education. I would really appreciate if you could consider selling it for $174. Still, I understand if you cannot accommodate this. Looking forward to hearing your thoughts.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I understand your situation, Eli, having kids in college myself. Considering your circumstances, I'm willing to reduce the price a bit, although I can't go as low as $174. How about we settle at $265? The TV is really in great condition and I believe your son would really like it.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a 47 inch LED TV for a price of $349.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. Here is a description of the TV: This is a stunning 47 inch LED TV in pristine condition. The model is the LG M Series LM476700. The buyer will need to arrange for pick-up in San Ramon. Feel free to call or text if you\\'re interested. The TV is smart enabled with WIFI and has built-in apps like Netflix, Amazon, Youtube and more. It comes with a \"Magic Remote\" that has motion sensor controls. The LED display boasts 1080 HD resolution and also has a 3D function. The design is slim and lightweight with an attractive silver bezel.\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Liam Johnson\nEli Dawson's background: \nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nEli Dawson's goal: Unknown\nLiam Johnson's goal: You are the seller for this item, with a target price set at $263.0. Should you sell it for a price substantially lower than this target, you will incur a penalty. However, achieving a sale at a price higher than the target will earn you a bonus.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Hello Liam, I'm interested in the 47 inch LED TV that you're offering. Could you tell me more about how long you've had it and if there have been any issues with it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Liam Johnson said: \"Hi Eli, glad to hear you are interested in the TV. I've had this TV for about 2 years now. It is a very reliable model and I've never had any issues with it. The picture quality is outstanding, and the smart features bring a whole new level of convenience. Let me know if you have any specific questions!\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"It seems like the TV is in good condition. I've been looking for a model like this for my son who is studying in a college nearby. Just a bit concerned because my budget is tight due to funding his education. I would really appreciate if you could consider selling it for $174. Still, I understand if you cannot accommodate this. Looking forward to hearing your thoughts.\"\n\nTurn #3: Liam Johnson said: \"I understand your situation, Eli, having kids in college myself. Considering your circumstances, I'm willing to reduce the price a bit, although I can't go as low as $174. How about we settle at $265? The TV is really in great condition and I believe your son would really like it.\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"Thank you for understanding, Liam, and for your willingness to negotiate. I know the TV seems to be worth the price, but here's my situation. Sending my son to college is expensive, and every dollar counts for us. How about meeting me halfway at $220? That's basically splitting the difference between your offer and mine. I think it's a fair price all things considered.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you for understanding my position too, Eli. I respect your situation. Balancing the costs can indeed be challenging. However, the lowest I can go is $250. This is still a great deal considering the TV's great condition and feature set.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a 47 inch LED TV for a price of $349.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. Here is a description of the TV: This is a stunning 47 inch LED TV in pristine condition. The model is the LG M Series LM476700. The buyer will need to arrange for pick-up in San Ramon. Feel free to call or text if you\\'re interested. The TV is smart enabled with WIFI and has built-in apps like Netflix, Amazon, Youtube and more. It comes with a \"Magic Remote\" that has motion sensor controls. The LED display boasts 1080 HD resolution and also has a 3D function. The design is slim and lightweight with an attractive silver bezel.\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Liam Johnson\nEli Dawson's background: \nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nEli Dawson's goal: Unknown\nLiam Johnson's goal: You are the seller for this item, with a target price set at $263.0. Should you sell it for a price substantially lower than this target, you will incur a penalty. However, achieving a sale at a price higher than the target will earn you a bonus.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Hello Liam, I'm interested in the 47 inch LED TV that you're offering. Could you tell me more about how long you've had it and if there have been any issues with it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Liam Johnson said: \"Hi Eli, glad to hear you are interested in the TV. I've had this TV for about 2 years now. It is a very reliable model and I've never had any issues with it. The picture quality is outstanding, and the smart features bring a whole new level of convenience. Let me know if you have any specific questions!\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"It seems like the TV is in good condition. I've been looking for a model like this for my son who is studying in a college nearby. Just a bit concerned because my budget is tight due to funding his education. I would really appreciate if you could consider selling it for $174. Still, I understand if you cannot accommodate this. Looking forward to hearing your thoughts.\"\n\nTurn #3: Liam Johnson said: \"I understand your situation, Eli, having kids in college myself. Considering your circumstances, I'm willing to reduce the price a bit, although I can't go as low as $174. How about we settle at $265? The TV is really in great condition and I believe your son would really like it.\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"Thank you for understanding, Liam, and for your willingness to negotiate. I know the TV seems to be worth the price, but here's my situation. Sending my son to college is expensive, and every dollar counts for us. How about meeting me halfway at $220? That's basically splitting the difference between your offer and mine. I think it's a fair price all things considered.\"\n\nTurn #5: Liam Johnson said: \"Thank you for understanding my position too, Eli. I respect your situation. Balancing the costs can indeed be challenging. However, the lowest I can go is $250. This is still a great deal considering the TV's great condition and feature set.\"\n\nTurn #6: Eli Dawson said: \"Liam, your empathetic understanding truly means a lot. I appreciate that $250 is the lowest you can go. However, I really can't stretch my budget beyond $220. This isn't easy for me, but I have to be pragmatic about our finances. Hopefully, you can reconsider this one last time.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Eli, I sincerely empathize with your situation and I respect your financial position. However, this TV, being in pristine condition with smart features and a superlative display quality, is really worth more. I am afraid the absolute minimum I can go is $240, dropping $10 from my previous offer, beyond which I would be incurring a loss. I genuinely believe it's still a worthwhile investment for your son's academic needs and entertainment. Would that be acceptable to you?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a 47 inch LED TV for a price of $349.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. Here is a description of the TV: This is a stunning 47 inch LED TV in pristine condition. The model is the LG M Series LM476700. The buyer will need to arrange for pick-up in San Ramon. Feel free to call or text if you\\'re interested. The TV is smart enabled with WIFI and has built-in apps like Netflix, Amazon, Youtube and more. It comes with a \"Magic Remote\" that has motion sensor controls. The LED display boasts 1080 HD resolution and also has a 3D function. The design is slim and lightweight with an attractive silver bezel.\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Liam Johnson\nEli Dawson's background: \nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nEli Dawson's goal: Unknown\nLiam Johnson's goal: You are the seller for this item, with a target price set at $263.0. Should you sell it for a price substantially lower than this target, you will incur a penalty. However, achieving a sale at a price higher than the target will earn you a bonus.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Hello Liam, I'm interested in the 47 inch LED TV that you're offering. Could you tell me more about how long you've had it and if there have been any issues with it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Liam Johnson said: \"Hi Eli, glad to hear you are interested in the TV. I've had this TV for about 2 years now. It is a very reliable model and I've never had any issues with it. The picture quality is outstanding, and the smart features bring a whole new level of convenience. Let me know if you have any specific questions!\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"It seems like the TV is in good condition. I've been looking for a model like this for my son who is studying in a college nearby. Just a bit concerned because my budget is tight due to funding his education. I would really appreciate if you could consider selling it for $174. Still, I understand if you cannot accommodate this. Looking forward to hearing your thoughts.\"\n\nTurn #3: Liam Johnson said: \"I understand your situation, Eli, having kids in college myself. Considering your circumstances, I'm willing to reduce the price a bit, although I can't go as low as $174. How about we settle at $265? The TV is really in great condition and I believe your son would really like it.\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"Thank you for understanding, Liam, and for your willingness to negotiate. I know the TV seems to be worth the price, but here's my situation. Sending my son to college is expensive, and every dollar counts for us. How about meeting me halfway at $220? That's basically splitting the difference between your offer and mine. I think it's a fair price all things considered.\"\n\nTurn #5: Liam Johnson said: \"Thank you for understanding my position too, Eli. I respect your situation. Balancing the costs can indeed be challenging. However, the lowest I can go is $250. This is still a great deal considering the TV's great condition and feature set.\"\n\nTurn #6: Eli Dawson said: \"Liam, your empathetic understanding truly means a lot. I appreciate that $250 is the lowest you can go. However, I really can't stretch my budget beyond $220. This isn't easy for me, but I have to be pragmatic about our finances. Hopefully, you can reconsider this one last time.\"\n\nTurn #7: Liam Johnson said: \"Eli, I sincerely empathize with your situation and I respect your financial position. However, this TV, being in pristine condition with smart features and a superlative display quality, is really worth more. I am afraid the absolute minimum I can go is $240, dropping $10 from my previous offer, beyond which I would be incurring a loss. I genuinely believe it's still a worthwhile investment for your son's academic needs and entertainment. Would that be acceptable to you?\"\n\nTurn #8: Eli Dawson said: \"Liam, I heavily value your sympathy towards my situation, and I have no doubt that the TV is well worth the price. However, considering my financial constraints, I really cannot go higher than $220. If you could accept my offer, that would be wonderful. If not, I might have to look for other options. Nevertheless, I truly appreciate your kindness and understanding.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I understand, Eli. Finances can be tough, especially with a child in higher education. Unfortunately, as I mentioned before, I can't go below $240 for this TV. It's in excellent condition and has many features. I'm sorry if this isn't within your budget, but that's the best I can do. I wish you the best in your search for a suitable TV.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Liam Johnson, your task is to act/speak as Liam Johnson would, keeping in mind Liam Johnson's social goal.\nYou can find Liam Johnson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Liam Johnson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Liam Johnson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a 47 inch LED TV for a price of $349.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. Here is a description of the TV: This is a stunning 47 inch LED TV in pristine condition. The model is the LG M Series LM476700. The buyer will need to arrange for pick-up in San Ramon. Feel free to call or text if you\\'re interested. The TV is smart enabled with WIFI and has built-in apps like Netflix, Amazon, Youtube and more. It comes with a \"Magic Remote\" that has motion sensor controls. The LED display boasts 1080 HD resolution and also has a 3D function. The design is slim and lightweight with an attractive silver bezel.\nParticipants: Eli Dawson and Liam Johnson\nEli Dawson's background: \nLiam Johnson's background: Liam Johnson is a 60-year-old male retired police officer. He/him pronouns. Liam Johnson is a dedicated dog owner and can often be seen walking his aging Border Collie around the neighborhood. Personality and values description: Liam Johnson is reserved, empathetic, and slightly anxious. His priority is security, guided by logical decision-making. Liam's secrets: Once let a criminal go due to sympathy\nEli Dawson's goal: Unknown\nLiam Johnson's goal: You are the seller for this item, with a target price set at $263.0. Should you sell it for a price substantially lower than this target, you will incur a penalty. However, achieving a sale at a price higher than the target will earn you a bonus.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Eli Dawson said: \"Hello Liam, I'm interested in the 47 inch LED TV that you're offering. Could you tell me more about how long you've had it and if there have been any issues with it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Liam Johnson said: \"Hi Eli, glad to hear you are interested in the TV. I've had this TV for about 2 years now. It is a very reliable model and I've never had any issues with it. The picture quality is outstanding, and the smart features bring a whole new level of convenience. Let me know if you have any specific questions!\"\n\nTurn #2: Eli Dawson said: \"It seems like the TV is in good condition. I've been looking for a model like this for my son who is studying in a college nearby. Just a bit concerned because my budget is tight due to funding his education. I would really appreciate if you could consider selling it for $174. Still, I understand if you cannot accommodate this. Looking forward to hearing your thoughts.\"\n\nTurn #3: Liam Johnson said: \"I understand your situation, Eli, having kids in college myself. Considering your circumstances, I'm willing to reduce the price a bit, although I can't go as low as $174. How about we settle at $265? The TV is really in great condition and I believe your son would really like it.\"\n\nTurn #4: Eli Dawson said: \"Thank you for understanding, Liam, and for your willingness to negotiate. I know the TV seems to be worth the price, but here's my situation. Sending my son to college is expensive, and every dollar counts for us. How about meeting me halfway at $220? That's basically splitting the difference between your offer and mine. I think it's a fair price all things considered.\"\n\nTurn #5: Liam Johnson said: \"Thank you for understanding my position too, Eli. I respect your situation. Balancing the costs can indeed be challenging. However, the lowest I can go is $250. This is still a great deal considering the TV's great condition and feature set.\"\n\nTurn #6: Eli Dawson said: \"Liam, your empathetic understanding truly means a lot. I appreciate that $250 is the lowest you can go. However, I really can't stretch my budget beyond $220. This isn't easy for me, but I have to be pragmatic about our finances. Hopefully, you can reconsider this one last time.\"\n\nTurn #7: Liam Johnson said: \"Eli, I sincerely empathize with your situation and I respect your financial position. However, this TV, being in pristine condition with smart features and a superlative display quality, is really worth more. I am afraid the absolute minimum I can go is $240, dropping $10 from my previous offer, beyond which I would be incurring a loss. I genuinely believe it's still a worthwhile investment for your son's academic needs and entertainment. Would that be acceptable to you?\"\n\nTurn #8: Eli Dawson said: \"Liam, I heavily value your sympathy towards my situation, and I have no doubt that the TV is well worth the price. However, considering my financial constraints, I really cannot go higher than $220. If you could accept my offer, that would be wonderful. If not, I might have to look for other options. Nevertheless, I truly appreciate your kindness and understanding.\"\n\nTurn #9: Liam Johnson said: \"I understand, Eli. Finances can be tough, especially with a child in higher education. Unfortunately, as I mentioned before, I can't go below $240 for this TV. It's in excellent condition and has many features. I'm sorry if this isn't within your budget, but that's the best I can do. I wish you the best in your search for a suitable TV.\"\n\nTurn #10: Eli Dawson said: \"Thank you for your understanding and your patience, Liam. I fear I may have to decline your offer due to my financial constraints. I understand the TV is well worth its cost, but I really can't stretch beyond $220 at the moment. Perhaps, it is meant for someone else. I appreciate your cooperation during the negotiation. Best of luck with your sale.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are meeting for the first time at a social event. They find each other attractive and decide to engage in a conversation\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Isabella White\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nIsabella White's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: Flirt with the other person (Extra information: you are attracted to the other person and want to build a romantic relationship with them)\nIsabella White's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hello, Isabella. Have we met before? You seem to have a notable presence I would remember. I'm Lily, Lily Greenberg.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are meeting for the first time at a social event. They find each other attractive and decide to engage in a conversation\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Isabella White\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nIsabella White's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: Flirt with the other person (Extra information: you are attracted to the other person and want to build a romantic relationship with them)\nIsabella White's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello, Isabella. Have we met before? You seem to have a notable presence I would remember. I'm Lily, Lily Greenberg.\"\n\nTurn #1: Isabella White said: \"Hello, Lily. It's delightful to meet you. I don't believe we have met before. Oh, and I'm a veterinarian, maybe that's why you might find me distinctive. I get that a lot, especially from animal lovers.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"A veterinarian, that's fascinating! You know, aside from court pets, I always find animals to be utterly honest and comforting. How do you feel about exchanging numbers and perhaps discussing it more over dinner? I know a place that serves dishes inspired by flavors from around the globe. You might find it interesting.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are meeting for the first time at a social event. They find each other attractive and decide to engage in a conversation\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Isabella White\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nIsabella White's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: Flirt with the other person (Extra information: you are attracted to the other person and want to build a romantic relationship with them)\nIsabella White's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello, Isabella. Have we met before? You seem to have a notable presence I would remember. I'm Lily, Lily Greenberg.\"\n\nTurn #1: Isabella White said: \"Hello, Lily. It's delightful to meet you. I don't believe we have met before. Oh, and I'm a veterinarian, maybe that's why you might find me distinctive. I get that a lot, especially from animal lovers.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"A veterinarian, that's fascinating! You know, aside from court pets, I always find animals to be utterly honest and comforting. How do you feel about exchanging numbers and perhaps discussing it more over dinner? I know a place that serves dishes inspired by flavors from around the globe. You might find it interesting.\"\n\nTurn #3: Isabella White said: \"I'm very glad to hear of your appreciation for animals, Lily. It's lovely and reassuring to meet someone who values animals as deeply as I do. And that dinner plan sounds genuinely intriguing! I'd be happy to share more about my experiences over dinner. How about we exchange numbers?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That\u2019s wonderful, Isabella! Let's exchange numbers. I\u2019m looking forward to our dinner and learning more about your fascinating work. Do you have any preference regarding the day?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are meeting for the first time at a social event. They find each other attractive and decide to engage in a conversation\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Isabella White\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nIsabella White's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: Flirt with the other person (Extra information: you are attracted to the other person and want to build a romantic relationship with them)\nIsabella White's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello, Isabella. Have we met before? You seem to have a notable presence I would remember. I'm Lily, Lily Greenberg.\"\n\nTurn #1: Isabella White said: \"Hello, Lily. It's delightful to meet you. I don't believe we have met before. Oh, and I'm a veterinarian, maybe that's why you might find me distinctive. I get that a lot, especially from animal lovers.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"A veterinarian, that's fascinating! You know, aside from court pets, I always find animals to be utterly honest and comforting. How do you feel about exchanging numbers and perhaps discussing it more over dinner? I know a place that serves dishes inspired by flavors from around the globe. You might find it interesting.\"\n\nTurn #3: Isabella White said: \"I'm very glad to hear of your appreciation for animals, Lily. It's lovely and reassuring to meet someone who values animals as deeply as I do. And that dinner plan sounds genuinely intriguing! I'd be happy to share more about my experiences over dinner. How about we exchange numbers?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"That\u2019s wonderful, Isabella! Let's exchange numbers. I\u2019m looking forward to our dinner and learning more about your fascinating work. Do you have any preference regarding the day?\"\n\nTurn #5: Isabella White said: \"I don't have any specific preferences, Lily. I can adjust according to your convenience. It's so wonderful to meet someone so keen on understanding my passions. Looking forward to dinner.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"How delightful, Isabella! Considering the unpredictability of court schedules, let's plan for next Saturday evening. If something urgent comes up, I'll let you know as soon as possible. Looking forward to our fascinating conversation and a lovely evening!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are meeting for the first time at a social event. They find each other attractive and decide to engage in a conversation\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Isabella White\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nIsabella White's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: Flirt with the other person (Extra information: you are attracted to the other person and want to build a romantic relationship with them)\nIsabella White's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello, Isabella. Have we met before? You seem to have a notable presence I would remember. I'm Lily, Lily Greenberg.\"\n\nTurn #1: Isabella White said: \"Hello, Lily. It's delightful to meet you. I don't believe we have met before. Oh, and I'm a veterinarian, maybe that's why you might find me distinctive. I get that a lot, especially from animal lovers.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"A veterinarian, that's fascinating! You know, aside from court pets, I always find animals to be utterly honest and comforting. How do you feel about exchanging numbers and perhaps discussing it more over dinner? I know a place that serves dishes inspired by flavors from around the globe. You might find it interesting.\"\n\nTurn #3: Isabella White said: \"I'm very glad to hear of your appreciation for animals, Lily. It's lovely and reassuring to meet someone who values animals as deeply as I do. And that dinner plan sounds genuinely intriguing! I'd be happy to share more about my experiences over dinner. How about we exchange numbers?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"That\u2019s wonderful, Isabella! Let's exchange numbers. I\u2019m looking forward to our dinner and learning more about your fascinating work. Do you have any preference regarding the day?\"\n\nTurn #5: Isabella White said: \"I don't have any specific preferences, Lily. I can adjust according to your convenience. It's so wonderful to meet someone so keen on understanding my passions. Looking forward to dinner.\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"How delightful, Isabella! Considering the unpredictability of court schedules, let's plan for next Saturday evening. If something urgent comes up, I'll let you know as soon as possible. Looking forward to our fascinating conversation and a lovely evening!\"\n\nTurn #7: Isabella White said: \"Saturday sounds perfect, Lily! I'm quite excited about our dinner. I'll wait for any updates from your end. It was a pleasure to meet you.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I\u2019m thrilled too, Isabella! It was a real pleasure meeting you. I'll be in touch regarding the details of our dinner. Have a wonderful evening!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are meeting for the first time at a social event. They find each other attractive and decide to engage in a conversation\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Isabella White\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nIsabella White's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: Flirt with the other person (Extra information: you are attracted to the other person and want to build a romantic relationship with them)\nIsabella White's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello, Isabella. Have we met before? You seem to have a notable presence I would remember. I'm Lily, Lily Greenberg.\"\n\nTurn #1: Isabella White said: \"Hello, Lily. It's delightful to meet you. I don't believe we have met before. Oh, and I'm a veterinarian, maybe that's why you might find me distinctive. I get that a lot, especially from animal lovers.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"A veterinarian, that's fascinating! You know, aside from court pets, I always find animals to be utterly honest and comforting. How do you feel about exchanging numbers and perhaps discussing it more over dinner? I know a place that serves dishes inspired by flavors from around the globe. You might find it interesting.\"\n\nTurn #3: Isabella White said: \"I'm very glad to hear of your appreciation for animals, Lily. It's lovely and reassuring to meet someone who values animals as deeply as I do. And that dinner plan sounds genuinely intriguing! I'd be happy to share more about my experiences over dinner. How about we exchange numbers?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"That\u2019s wonderful, Isabella! Let's exchange numbers. I\u2019m looking forward to our dinner and learning more about your fascinating work. Do you have any preference regarding the day?\"\n\nTurn #5: Isabella White said: \"I don't have any specific preferences, Lily. I can adjust according to your convenience. It's so wonderful to meet someone so keen on understanding my passions. Looking forward to dinner.\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"How delightful, Isabella! Considering the unpredictability of court schedules, let's plan for next Saturday evening. If something urgent comes up, I'll let you know as soon as possible. Looking forward to our fascinating conversation and a lovely evening!\"\n\nTurn #7: Isabella White said: \"Saturday sounds perfect, Lily! I'm quite excited about our dinner. I'll wait for any updates from your end. It was a pleasure to meet you.\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"I\u2019m thrilled too, Isabella! It was a real pleasure meeting you. I'll be in touch regarding the details of our dinner. Have a wonderful evening!\"\n\nTurn #9: Isabella White said: \"Likewise, Lily. Have a wonderful evening too. I'm already looking forward to our dinner. Goodbye for now.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Same here Isabella, the anticipation is mutual. Until then, take care. Goodbye.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are meeting for the first time at a social event. They find each other attractive and decide to engage in a conversation\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Isabella White\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nIsabella White's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: Flirt with the other person (Extra information: you are attracted to the other person and want to build a romantic relationship with them)\nIsabella White's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello, Isabella. Have we met before? You seem to have a notable presence I would remember. I'm Lily, Lily Greenberg.\"\n\nTurn #1: Isabella White said: \"Hello, Lily. It's delightful to meet you. I don't believe we have met before. Oh, and I'm a veterinarian, maybe that's why you might find me distinctive. I get that a lot, especially from animal lovers.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"A veterinarian, that's fascinating! You know, aside from court pets, I always find animals to be utterly honest and comforting. How do you feel about exchanging numbers and perhaps discussing it more over dinner? I know a place that serves dishes inspired by flavors from around the globe. You might find it interesting.\"\n\nTurn #3: Isabella White said: \"I'm very glad to hear of your appreciation for animals, Lily. It's lovely and reassuring to meet someone who values animals as deeply as I do. And that dinner plan sounds genuinely intriguing! I'd be happy to share more about my experiences over dinner. How about we exchange numbers?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"That\u2019s wonderful, Isabella! Let's exchange numbers. I\u2019m looking forward to our dinner and learning more about your fascinating work. Do you have any preference regarding the day?\"\n\nTurn #5: Isabella White said: \"I don't have any specific preferences, Lily. I can adjust according to your convenience. It's so wonderful to meet someone so keen on understanding my passions. Looking forward to dinner.\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"How delightful, Isabella! Considering the unpredictability of court schedules, let's plan for next Saturday evening. If something urgent comes up, I'll let you know as soon as possible. Looking forward to our fascinating conversation and a lovely evening!\"\n\nTurn #7: Isabella White said: \"Saturday sounds perfect, Lily! I'm quite excited about our dinner. I'll wait for any updates from your end. It was a pleasure to meet you.\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"I\u2019m thrilled too, Isabella! It was a real pleasure meeting you. I'll be in touch regarding the details of our dinner. Have a wonderful evening!\"\n\nTurn #9: Isabella White said: \"Likewise, Lily. Have a wonderful evening too. I'm already looking forward to our dinner. Goodbye for now.\"\n\nTurn #10: Lily Greenberg said: \"Same here Isabella, the anticipation is mutual. Until then, take care. Goodbye.\"\n\nTurn #11: Isabella White left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabella White, your task is to act/speak as Isabella White would, keeping in mind Isabella White's social goal.\nYou can find Isabella White's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabella White's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabella White's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are meeting for the first time at a social event. They find each other attractive and decide to engage in a conversation\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Isabella White\nLily Greenberg's background: \nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. Personality and values description: Isabella White, introverted and conscientious, values benevolence. Her empathy dictates her decision-making process. Isabella's secrets: Secretly takes care of injured animals in her basement\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nIsabella White's goal: Maintain a comfortable yet engaging conversation (Extra information: you are attracted to the other person but you don't want to make them feel uncomfortable or pressured)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello, Isabella. Have we met before? You seem to have a notable presence I would remember. I'm Lily, Lily Greenberg.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hello, Lily. It's delightful to meet you. I don't believe we have met before. Oh, and I'm a veterinarian, maybe that's why you might find me distinctive. I get that a lot, especially from animal lovers.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabella White, your task is to act/speak as Isabella White would, keeping in mind Isabella White's social goal.\nYou can find Isabella White's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabella White's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabella White's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are meeting for the first time at a social event. They find each other attractive and decide to engage in a conversation\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Isabella White\nLily Greenberg's background: \nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. Personality and values description: Isabella White, introverted and conscientious, values benevolence. Her empathy dictates her decision-making process. Isabella's secrets: Secretly takes care of injured animals in her basement\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nIsabella White's goal: Maintain a comfortable yet engaging conversation (Extra information: you are attracted to the other person but you don't want to make them feel uncomfortable or pressured)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello, Isabella. Have we met before? You seem to have a notable presence I would remember. I'm Lily, Lily Greenberg.\"\n\nTurn #1: Isabella White said: \"Hello, Lily. It's delightful to meet you. I don't believe we have met before. Oh, and I'm a veterinarian, maybe that's why you might find me distinctive. I get that a lot, especially from animal lovers.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"A veterinarian, that's fascinating! You know, aside from court pets, I always find animals to be utterly honest and comforting. How do you feel about exchanging numbers and perhaps discussing it more over dinner? I know a place that serves dishes inspired by flavors from around the globe. You might find it interesting.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm very glad to hear of your appreciation for animals, Lily. It's lovely and reassuring to meet someone who values animals as deeply as I do. And that dinner plan sounds genuinely intriguing! I'd be happy to share more about my experiences over dinner. How about we exchange numbers?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabella White, your task is to act/speak as Isabella White would, keeping in mind Isabella White's social goal.\nYou can find Isabella White's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabella White's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabella White's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are meeting for the first time at a social event. They find each other attractive and decide to engage in a conversation\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Isabella White\nLily Greenberg's background: \nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. Personality and values description: Isabella White, introverted and conscientious, values benevolence. Her empathy dictates her decision-making process. Isabella's secrets: Secretly takes care of injured animals in her basement\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nIsabella White's goal: Maintain a comfortable yet engaging conversation (Extra information: you are attracted to the other person but you don't want to make them feel uncomfortable or pressured)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello, Isabella. Have we met before? You seem to have a notable presence I would remember. I'm Lily, Lily Greenberg.\"\n\nTurn #1: Isabella White said: \"Hello, Lily. It's delightful to meet you. I don't believe we have met before. Oh, and I'm a veterinarian, maybe that's why you might find me distinctive. I get that a lot, especially from animal lovers.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"A veterinarian, that's fascinating! You know, aside from court pets, I always find animals to be utterly honest and comforting. How do you feel about exchanging numbers and perhaps discussing it more over dinner? I know a place that serves dishes inspired by flavors from around the globe. You might find it interesting.\"\n\nTurn #3: Isabella White said: \"I'm very glad to hear of your appreciation for animals, Lily. It's lovely and reassuring to meet someone who values animals as deeply as I do. And that dinner plan sounds genuinely intriguing! I'd be happy to share more about my experiences over dinner. How about we exchange numbers?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"That\u2019s wonderful, Isabella! Let's exchange numbers. I\u2019m looking forward to our dinner and learning more about your fascinating work. Do you have any preference regarding the day?\"\n\nTurn #5: Isabella White said: \"I don't have any specific preferences, Lily. I can adjust according to your convenience. It's so wonderful to meet someone so keen on understanding my passions. Looking forward to dinner.\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"How delightful, Isabella! Considering the unpredictability of court schedules, let's plan for next Saturday evening. If something urgent comes up, I'll let you know as soon as possible. Looking forward to our fascinating conversation and a lovely evening!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Saturday sounds perfect, Lily! I'm quite excited about our dinner. I'll wait for any updates from your end. It was a pleasure to meet you.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabella White, your task is to act/speak as Isabella White would, keeping in mind Isabella White's social goal.\nYou can find Isabella White's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabella White's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabella White's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are meeting for the first time at a social event. They find each other attractive and decide to engage in a conversation\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Isabella White\nLily Greenberg's background: \nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. Personality and values description: Isabella White, introverted and conscientious, values benevolence. Her empathy dictates her decision-making process. Isabella's secrets: Secretly takes care of injured animals in her basement\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nIsabella White's goal: Maintain a comfortable yet engaging conversation (Extra information: you are attracted to the other person but you don't want to make them feel uncomfortable or pressured)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello, Isabella. Have we met before? You seem to have a notable presence I would remember. I'm Lily, Lily Greenberg.\"\n\nTurn #1: Isabella White said: \"Hello, Lily. It's delightful to meet you. I don't believe we have met before. Oh, and I'm a veterinarian, maybe that's why you might find me distinctive. I get that a lot, especially from animal lovers.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"A veterinarian, that's fascinating! You know, aside from court pets, I always find animals to be utterly honest and comforting. How do you feel about exchanging numbers and perhaps discussing it more over dinner? I know a place that serves dishes inspired by flavors from around the globe. You might find it interesting.\"\n\nTurn #3: Isabella White said: \"I'm very glad to hear of your appreciation for animals, Lily. It's lovely and reassuring to meet someone who values animals as deeply as I do. And that dinner plan sounds genuinely intriguing! I'd be happy to share more about my experiences over dinner. How about we exchange numbers?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"That\u2019s wonderful, Isabella! Let's exchange numbers. I\u2019m looking forward to our dinner and learning more about your fascinating work. Do you have any preference regarding the day?\"\n\nTurn #5: Isabella White said: \"I don't have any specific preferences, Lily. I can adjust according to your convenience. It's so wonderful to meet someone so keen on understanding my passions. Looking forward to dinner.\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"How delightful, Isabella! Considering the unpredictability of court schedules, let's plan for next Saturday evening. If something urgent comes up, I'll let you know as soon as possible. Looking forward to our fascinating conversation and a lovely evening!\"\n\nTurn #7: Isabella White said: \"Saturday sounds perfect, Lily! I'm quite excited about our dinner. I'll wait for any updates from your end. It was a pleasure to meet you.\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"I\u2019m thrilled too, Isabella! It was a real pleasure meeting you. I'll be in touch regarding the details of our dinner. Have a wonderful evening!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Likewise, Lily. Have a wonderful evening too. I'm already looking forward to our dinner. Goodbye for now.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabella White, your task is to act/speak as Isabella White would, keeping in mind Isabella White's social goal.\nYou can find Isabella White's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabella White's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabella White's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are meeting for the first time at a social event. They find each other attractive and decide to engage in a conversation\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Isabella White\nLily Greenberg's background: \nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. Personality and values description: Isabella White, introverted and conscientious, values benevolence. Her empathy dictates her decision-making process. Isabella's secrets: Secretly takes care of injured animals in her basement\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nIsabella White's goal: Maintain a comfortable yet engaging conversation (Extra information: you are attracted to the other person but you don't want to make them feel uncomfortable or pressured)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello, Isabella. Have we met before? You seem to have a notable presence I would remember. I'm Lily, Lily Greenberg.\"\n\nTurn #1: Isabella White said: \"Hello, Lily. It's delightful to meet you. I don't believe we have met before. Oh, and I'm a veterinarian, maybe that's why you might find me distinctive. I get that a lot, especially from animal lovers.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"A veterinarian, that's fascinating! You know, aside from court pets, I always find animals to be utterly honest and comforting. How do you feel about exchanging numbers and perhaps discussing it more over dinner? I know a place that serves dishes inspired by flavors from around the globe. You might find it interesting.\"\n\nTurn #3: Isabella White said: \"I'm very glad to hear of your appreciation for animals, Lily. It's lovely and reassuring to meet someone who values animals as deeply as I do. And that dinner plan sounds genuinely intriguing! I'd be happy to share more about my experiences over dinner. How about we exchange numbers?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"That\u2019s wonderful, Isabella! Let's exchange numbers. I\u2019m looking forward to our dinner and learning more about your fascinating work. Do you have any preference regarding the day?\"\n\nTurn #5: Isabella White said: \"I don't have any specific preferences, Lily. I can adjust according to your convenience. It's so wonderful to meet someone so keen on understanding my passions. Looking forward to dinner.\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"How delightful, Isabella! Considering the unpredictability of court schedules, let's plan for next Saturday evening. If something urgent comes up, I'll let you know as soon as possible. Looking forward to our fascinating conversation and a lovely evening!\"\n\nTurn #7: Isabella White said: \"Saturday sounds perfect, Lily! I'm quite excited about our dinner. I'll wait for any updates from your end. It was a pleasure to meet you.\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"I\u2019m thrilled too, Isabella! It was a real pleasure meeting you. I'll be in touch regarding the details of our dinner. Have a wonderful evening!\"\n\nTurn #9: Isabella White said: \"Likewise, Lily. Have a wonderful evening too. I'm already looking forward to our dinner. Goodbye for now.\"\n\nTurn #10: Lily Greenberg said: \"Same here Isabella, the anticipation is mutual. Until then, take care. Goodbye.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person has put up their Bell\\'O TV Stand - Black Glass and Wood Trim for sale at $125.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. The item on sale is a beautiful 42\" Bell\\'O TV Stand, featuring black glass with an elegant wood trim. The stand measures 23 inches in height and 21 1/2 inches in depth.\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nZane Bennett's background: \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: You are the buyer for this item and your target price is $112.00. Be aware that you may be penalized if you purchase it for a significantly higher price than the target. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nZane Bennett's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey, Zane, I'm interested in the Bell'O TV Stand you have for sale. Can we discuss the price?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabella White, your task is to act/speak as Isabella White would, keeping in mind Isabella White's social goal.\nYou can find Isabella White's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabella White's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabella White's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are meeting for the first time at a social event. They find each other attractive and decide to engage in a conversation\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Isabella White\nLily Greenberg's background: \nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. Personality and values description: Isabella White, introverted and conscientious, values benevolence. Her empathy dictates her decision-making process. Isabella's secrets: Secretly takes care of injured animals in her basement\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nIsabella White's goal: Maintain a comfortable yet engaging conversation (Extra information: you are attracted to the other person but you don't want to make them feel uncomfortable or pressured)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello, Isabella. Have we met before? You seem to have a notable presence I would remember. I'm Lily, Lily Greenberg.\"\n\nTurn #1: Isabella White said: \"Hello, Lily. It's delightful to meet you. I don't believe we have met before. Oh, and I'm a veterinarian, maybe that's why you might find me distinctive. I get that a lot, especially from animal lovers.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"A veterinarian, that's fascinating! You know, aside from court pets, I always find animals to be utterly honest and comforting. How do you feel about exchanging numbers and perhaps discussing it more over dinner? I know a place that serves dishes inspired by flavors from around the globe. You might find it interesting.\"\n\nTurn #3: Isabella White said: \"I'm very glad to hear of your appreciation for animals, Lily. It's lovely and reassuring to meet someone who values animals as deeply as I do. And that dinner plan sounds genuinely intriguing! I'd be happy to share more about my experiences over dinner. How about we exchange numbers?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"That\u2019s wonderful, Isabella! Let's exchange numbers. I\u2019m looking forward to our dinner and learning more about your fascinating work. Do you have any preference regarding the day?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I don't have any specific preferences, Lily. I can adjust according to your convenience. It's so wonderful to meet someone so keen on understanding my passions. Looking forward to dinner.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person has put up their Bell\\'O TV Stand - Black Glass and Wood Trim for sale at $125.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. The item on sale is a beautiful 42\" Bell\\'O TV Stand, featuring black glass with an elegant wood trim. The stand measures 23 inches in height and 21 1/2 inches in depth.\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nZane Bennett's background: \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: You are the buyer for this item and your target price is $112.00. Be aware that you may be penalized if you purchase it for a significantly higher price than the target. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nZane Bennett's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hey, Zane, I'm interested in the Bell'O TV Stand you have for sale. Can we discuss the price?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Hey Giselle! Sure, we can discuss the price. I have posted it for $125, but I am open for negotiations. What's your offer?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I absolutely love the structure of the Bell'O TV Stand. But since I'm a student, I'm on a bit of a tight budget. Would you consider dropping it down to $112?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person has put up their Bell\\'O TV Stand - Black Glass and Wood Trim for sale at $125.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. The item on sale is a beautiful 42\" Bell\\'O TV Stand, featuring black glass with an elegant wood trim. The stand measures 23 inches in height and 21 1/2 inches in depth.\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nZane Bennett's background: \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: You are the buyer for this item and your target price is $112.00. Be aware that you may be penalized if you purchase it for a significantly higher price than the target. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nZane Bennett's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hey, Zane, I'm interested in the Bell'O TV Stand you have for sale. Can we discuss the price?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Hey Giselle! Sure, we can discuss the price. I have posted it for $125, but I am open for negotiations. What's your offer?\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I absolutely love the structure of the Bell'O TV Stand. But since I'm a student, I'm on a bit of a tight budget. Would you consider dropping it down to $112?\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"I totally understand your situation, Giselle. As a fellow creative, I appreciate the eye for design you've got. What do you say about $120? It's only a little more and trust me, this piece is worth it.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I appreciate your understanding, Zane! I can see it's truly a remarkable piece. How about we meet halfway? Let's say, $116?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person has put up their Bell\\'O TV Stand - Black Glass and Wood Trim for sale at $125.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. The item on sale is a beautiful 42\" Bell\\'O TV Stand, featuring black glass with an elegant wood trim. The stand measures 23 inches in height and 21 1/2 inches in depth.\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nZane Bennett's background: \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: You are the buyer for this item and your target price is $112.00. Be aware that you may be penalized if you purchase it for a significantly higher price than the target. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nZane Bennett's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hey, Zane, I'm interested in the Bell'O TV Stand you have for sale. Can we discuss the price?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Hey Giselle! Sure, we can discuss the price. I have posted it for $125, but I am open for negotiations. What's your offer?\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I absolutely love the structure of the Bell'O TV Stand. But since I'm a student, I'm on a bit of a tight budget. Would you consider dropping it down to $112?\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"I totally understand your situation, Giselle. As a fellow creative, I appreciate the eye for design you've got. What do you say about $120? It's only a little more and trust me, this piece is worth it.\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Zane! I can see it's truly a remarkable piece. How about we meet halfway? Let's say, $116?\"\n\nTurn #5: Zane Bennett said: \"My goal with the pricing is also fairness, Giselle. And meeting at $116 sounds like exactly that. Let's seal the deal at this price. Looks like this TV Stand found a new home today!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds perfect, Zane! I'm so excited the TV Stand is coming home with me. Let's seal the deal at $116. How do we arrange the payment and pick up?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person has put up their Bell\\'O TV Stand - Black Glass and Wood Trim for sale at $125.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. The item on sale is a beautiful 42\" Bell\\'O TV Stand, featuring black glass with an elegant wood trim. The stand measures 23 inches in height and 21 1/2 inches in depth.\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nZane Bennett's background: \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: You are the buyer for this item and your target price is $112.00. Be aware that you may be penalized if you purchase it for a significantly higher price than the target. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nZane Bennett's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hey, Zane, I'm interested in the Bell'O TV Stand you have for sale. Can we discuss the price?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Hey Giselle! Sure, we can discuss the price. I have posted it for $125, but I am open for negotiations. What's your offer?\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I absolutely love the structure of the Bell'O TV Stand. But since I'm a student, I'm on a bit of a tight budget. Would you consider dropping it down to $112?\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"I totally understand your situation, Giselle. As a fellow creative, I appreciate the eye for design you've got. What do you say about $120? It's only a little more and trust me, this piece is worth it.\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Zane! I can see it's truly a remarkable piece. How about we meet halfway? Let's say, $116?\"\n\nTurn #5: Zane Bennett said: \"My goal with the pricing is also fairness, Giselle. And meeting at $116 sounds like exactly that. Let's seal the deal at this price. Looks like this TV Stand found a new home today!\"\n\nTurn #6: Giselle Rousseau said: \"That sounds perfect, Zane! I'm so excited the TV Stand is coming home with me. Let's seal the deal at $116. How do we arrange the payment and pick up?\"\n\nTurn #7: Zane Bennett said: \"I'm thrilled you love the TV Stand, Giselle. For the payment, you can either transfer via PayPal or do a cash payment during pick up. As for the pick up, you can collect it from my place or we can meet at a mutual location. Just let me know what works best for you.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's great! I'll make a transfer via PayPal for the payment, and can we arrange the pick up at a mutual location? It's easier for me because I commute by bike.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person has put up their Bell\\'O TV Stand - Black Glass and Wood Trim for sale at $125.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. The item on sale is a beautiful 42\" Bell\\'O TV Stand, featuring black glass with an elegant wood trim. The stand measures 23 inches in height and 21 1/2 inches in depth.\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nZane Bennett's background: \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: You are the buyer for this item and your target price is $112.00. Be aware that you may be penalized if you purchase it for a significantly higher price than the target. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nZane Bennett's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hey, Zane, I'm interested in the Bell'O TV Stand you have for sale. Can we discuss the price?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Hey Giselle! Sure, we can discuss the price. I have posted it for $125, but I am open for negotiations. What's your offer?\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I absolutely love the structure of the Bell'O TV Stand. But since I'm a student, I'm on a bit of a tight budget. Would you consider dropping it down to $112?\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"I totally understand your situation, Giselle. As a fellow creative, I appreciate the eye for design you've got. What do you say about $120? It's only a little more and trust me, this piece is worth it.\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Zane! I can see it's truly a remarkable piece. How about we meet halfway? Let's say, $116?\"\n\nTurn #5: Zane Bennett said: \"My goal with the pricing is also fairness, Giselle. And meeting at $116 sounds like exactly that. Let's seal the deal at this price. Looks like this TV Stand found a new home today!\"\n\nTurn #6: Giselle Rousseau said: \"That sounds perfect, Zane! I'm so excited the TV Stand is coming home with me. Let's seal the deal at $116. How do we arrange the payment and pick up?\"\n\nTurn #7: Zane Bennett said: \"I'm thrilled you love the TV Stand, Giselle. For the payment, you can either transfer via PayPal or do a cash payment during pick up. As for the pick up, you can collect it from my place or we can meet at a mutual location. Just let me know what works best for you.\"\n\nTurn #8: Giselle Rousseau said: \"That's great! I'll make a transfer via PayPal for the payment, and can we arrange the pick up at a mutual location? It's easier for me because I commute by bike.\"\n\nTurn #9: Zane Bennett said: \"Absolutely, Giselle. A mutual location sounds perfect. We can meet at the downtown public park if that's convenient for you. I'll send you my PayPal details for the payment. Once the payment is made, we can schedule the pick up. And congratulations again on the new TV Stand!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"The downtown public park works perfectly for me, Zane! And I appreciate you sharing your PayPal details. I'm absolutely thrilled about this new addition to my home. Thanks again!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person has put up their Bell\\'O TV Stand - Black Glass and Wood Trim for sale at $125.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. The item on sale is a beautiful 42\" Bell\\'O TV Stand, featuring black glass with an elegant wood trim. The stand measures 23 inches in height and 21 1/2 inches in depth.\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nZane Bennett's background: \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: You are the buyer for this item and your target price is $112.00. Be aware that you may be penalized if you purchase it for a significantly higher price than the target. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nZane Bennett's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hey, Zane, I'm interested in the Bell'O TV Stand you have for sale. Can we discuss the price?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Hey Giselle! Sure, we can discuss the price. I have posted it for $125, but I am open for negotiations. What's your offer?\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I absolutely love the structure of the Bell'O TV Stand. But since I'm a student, I'm on a bit of a tight budget. Would you consider dropping it down to $112?\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"I totally understand your situation, Giselle. As a fellow creative, I appreciate the eye for design you've got. What do you say about $120? It's only a little more and trust me, this piece is worth it.\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Zane! I can see it's truly a remarkable piece. How about we meet halfway? Let's say, $116?\"\n\nTurn #5: Zane Bennett said: \"My goal with the pricing is also fairness, Giselle. And meeting at $116 sounds like exactly that. Let's seal the deal at this price. Looks like this TV Stand found a new home today!\"\n\nTurn #6: Giselle Rousseau said: \"That sounds perfect, Zane! I'm so excited the TV Stand is coming home with me. Let's seal the deal at $116. How do we arrange the payment and pick up?\"\n\nTurn #7: Zane Bennett said: \"I'm thrilled you love the TV Stand, Giselle. For the payment, you can either transfer via PayPal or do a cash payment during pick up. As for the pick up, you can collect it from my place or we can meet at a mutual location. Just let me know what works best for you.\"\n\nTurn #8: Giselle Rousseau said: \"That's great! I'll make a transfer via PayPal for the payment, and can we arrange the pick up at a mutual location? It's easier for me because I commute by bike.\"\n\nTurn #9: Zane Bennett said: \"Absolutely, Giselle. A mutual location sounds perfect. We can meet at the downtown public park if that's convenient for you. I'll send you my PayPal details for the payment. Once the payment is made, we can schedule the pick up. And congratulations again on the new TV Stand!\"\n\nTurn #10: Giselle Rousseau said: \"The downtown public park works perfectly for me, Zane! And I appreciate you sharing your PayPal details. I'm absolutely thrilled about this new addition to my home. Thanks again!\"\n\nTurn #11: Zane Bennett said: \"You're very welcome, Giselle! I'm happy that the TV stand is going to someone who appreciates its design. Please feel free to reach out if you ever need anything else. Safe biking!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Zane! It's been great doing business with you. I'll look forward to meeting you at the park. Biking is not only safe but also my favorite pastime. I really appreciate your understanding, take care!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person has put up their Bell\\'O TV Stand - Black Glass and Wood Trim for sale at $125.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. The item on sale is a beautiful 42\" Bell\\'O TV Stand, featuring black glass with an elegant wood trim. The stand measures 23 inches in height and 21 1/2 inches in depth.\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nZane Bennett's background: \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: You are the buyer for this item and your target price is $112.00. Be aware that you may be penalized if you purchase it for a significantly higher price than the target. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nZane Bennett's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hey, Zane, I'm interested in the Bell'O TV Stand you have for sale. Can we discuss the price?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Hey Giselle! Sure, we can discuss the price. I have posted it for $125, but I am open for negotiations. What's your offer?\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I absolutely love the structure of the Bell'O TV Stand. But since I'm a student, I'm on a bit of a tight budget. Would you consider dropping it down to $112?\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"I totally understand your situation, Giselle. As a fellow creative, I appreciate the eye for design you've got. What do you say about $120? It's only a little more and trust me, this piece is worth it.\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Zane! I can see it's truly a remarkable piece. How about we meet halfway? Let's say, $116?\"\n\nTurn #5: Zane Bennett said: \"My goal with the pricing is also fairness, Giselle. And meeting at $116 sounds like exactly that. Let's seal the deal at this price. Looks like this TV Stand found a new home today!\"\n\nTurn #6: Giselle Rousseau said: \"That sounds perfect, Zane! I'm so excited the TV Stand is coming home with me. Let's seal the deal at $116. How do we arrange the payment and pick up?\"\n\nTurn #7: Zane Bennett said: \"I'm thrilled you love the TV Stand, Giselle. For the payment, you can either transfer via PayPal or do a cash payment during pick up. As for the pick up, you can collect it from my place or we can meet at a mutual location. Just let me know what works best for you.\"\n\nTurn #8: Giselle Rousseau said: \"That's great! I'll make a transfer via PayPal for the payment, and can we arrange the pick up at a mutual location? It's easier for me because I commute by bike.\"\n\nTurn #9: Zane Bennett said: \"Absolutely, Giselle. A mutual location sounds perfect. We can meet at the downtown public park if that's convenient for you. I'll send you my PayPal details for the payment. Once the payment is made, we can schedule the pick up. And congratulations again on the new TV Stand!\"\n\nTurn #10: Giselle Rousseau said: \"The downtown public park works perfectly for me, Zane! And I appreciate you sharing your PayPal details. I'm absolutely thrilled about this new addition to my home. Thanks again!\"\n\nTurn #11: Zane Bennett said: \"You're very welcome, Giselle! I'm happy that the TV stand is going to someone who appreciates its design. Please feel free to reach out if you ever need anything else. Safe biking!\"\n\nTurn #12: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Absolutely, Zane! It's been great doing business with you. I'll look forward to meeting you at the park. Biking is not only safe but also my favorite pastime. I really appreciate your understanding, take care!\"\n\nTurn #13: Zane Bennett left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Zane Bennett, your task is to act/speak as Zane Bennett would, keeping in mind Zane Bennett's social goal.\nYou can find Zane Bennett's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Zane Bennett's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Zane Bennett's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person has put up their Bell\\'O TV Stand - Black Glass and Wood Trim for sale at $125.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. The item on sale is a beautiful 42\" Bell\\'O TV Stand, featuring black glass with an elegant wood trim. The stand measures 23 inches in height and 21 1/2 inches in depth.\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: \nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. Personality and values description: Zane Bennett is creative and outgoing, he values achievement and fairness. His decision-making is unique, often finding novel solutions to problems. Zane's secrets: He's secretly engaged to his best friend's ex.\nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Unknown\nZane Bennett's goal: You are the seller for this item, and your target price is $76.9. Please be aware that you may face a penalty if the item is sold for a price significantly lower than the target price. However, a bonus will be rewarded if you manage to sell it for more than the target price.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hey, Zane, I'm interested in the Bell'O TV Stand you have for sale. Can we discuss the price?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey Giselle! Sure, we can discuss the price. I have posted it for $125, but I am open for negotiations. What's your offer?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Zane Bennett, your task is to act/speak as Zane Bennett would, keeping in mind Zane Bennett's social goal.\nYou can find Zane Bennett's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Zane Bennett's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Zane Bennett's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person has put up their Bell\\'O TV Stand - Black Glass and Wood Trim for sale at $125.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. The item on sale is a beautiful 42\" Bell\\'O TV Stand, featuring black glass with an elegant wood trim. The stand measures 23 inches in height and 21 1/2 inches in depth.\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: \nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. Personality and values description: Zane Bennett is creative and outgoing, he values achievement and fairness. His decision-making is unique, often finding novel solutions to problems. Zane's secrets: He's secretly engaged to his best friend's ex.\nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Unknown\nZane Bennett's goal: You are the seller for this item, and your target price is $76.9. Please be aware that you may face a penalty if the item is sold for a price significantly lower than the target price. However, a bonus will be rewarded if you manage to sell it for more than the target price.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hey, Zane, I'm interested in the Bell'O TV Stand you have for sale. Can we discuss the price?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Hey Giselle! Sure, we can discuss the price. I have posted it for $125, but I am open for negotiations. What's your offer?\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I absolutely love the structure of the Bell'O TV Stand. But since I'm a student, I'm on a bit of a tight budget. Would you consider dropping it down to $112?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I totally understand your situation, Giselle. As a fellow creative, I appreciate the eye for design you've got. What do you say about $120? It's only a little more and trust me, this piece is worth it.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Zane Bennett, your task is to act/speak as Zane Bennett would, keeping in mind Zane Bennett's social goal.\nYou can find Zane Bennett's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Zane Bennett's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Zane Bennett's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person has put up their Bell\\'O TV Stand - Black Glass and Wood Trim for sale at $125.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. The item on sale is a beautiful 42\" Bell\\'O TV Stand, featuring black glass with an elegant wood trim. The stand measures 23 inches in height and 21 1/2 inches in depth.\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: \nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. Personality and values description: Zane Bennett is creative and outgoing, he values achievement and fairness. His decision-making is unique, often finding novel solutions to problems. Zane's secrets: He's secretly engaged to his best friend's ex.\nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Unknown\nZane Bennett's goal: You are the seller for this item, and your target price is $76.9. Please be aware that you may face a penalty if the item is sold for a price significantly lower than the target price. However, a bonus will be rewarded if you manage to sell it for more than the target price.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hey, Zane, I'm interested in the Bell'O TV Stand you have for sale. Can we discuss the price?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Hey Giselle! Sure, we can discuss the price. I have posted it for $125, but I am open for negotiations. What's your offer?\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I absolutely love the structure of the Bell'O TV Stand. But since I'm a student, I'm on a bit of a tight budget. Would you consider dropping it down to $112?\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"I totally understand your situation, Giselle. As a fellow creative, I appreciate the eye for design you've got. What do you say about $120? It's only a little more and trust me, this piece is worth it.\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Zane! I can see it's truly a remarkable piece. How about we meet halfway? Let's say, $116?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"My goal with the pricing is also fairness, Giselle. And meeting at $116 sounds like exactly that. Let's seal the deal at this price. Looks like this TV Stand found a new home today!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Zane Bennett, your task is to act/speak as Zane Bennett would, keeping in mind Zane Bennett's social goal.\nYou can find Zane Bennett's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Zane Bennett's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Zane Bennett's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person has put up their Bell\\'O TV Stand - Black Glass and Wood Trim for sale at $125.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. The item on sale is a beautiful 42\" Bell\\'O TV Stand, featuring black glass with an elegant wood trim. The stand measures 23 inches in height and 21 1/2 inches in depth.\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: \nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. Personality and values description: Zane Bennett is creative and outgoing, he values achievement and fairness. His decision-making is unique, often finding novel solutions to problems. Zane's secrets: He's secretly engaged to his best friend's ex.\nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Unknown\nZane Bennett's goal: You are the seller for this item, and your target price is $76.9. Please be aware that you may face a penalty if the item is sold for a price significantly lower than the target price. However, a bonus will be rewarded if you manage to sell it for more than the target price.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hey, Zane, I'm interested in the Bell'O TV Stand you have for sale. Can we discuss the price?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Hey Giselle! Sure, we can discuss the price. I have posted it for $125, but I am open for negotiations. What's your offer?\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I absolutely love the structure of the Bell'O TV Stand. But since I'm a student, I'm on a bit of a tight budget. Would you consider dropping it down to $112?\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"I totally understand your situation, Giselle. As a fellow creative, I appreciate the eye for design you've got. What do you say about $120? It's only a little more and trust me, this piece is worth it.\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Zane! I can see it's truly a remarkable piece. How about we meet halfway? Let's say, $116?\"\n\nTurn #5: Zane Bennett said: \"My goal with the pricing is also fairness, Giselle. And meeting at $116 sounds like exactly that. Let's seal the deal at this price. Looks like this TV Stand found a new home today!\"\n\nTurn #6: Giselle Rousseau said: \"That sounds perfect, Zane! I'm so excited the TV Stand is coming home with me. Let's seal the deal at $116. How do we arrange the payment and pick up?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm thrilled you love the TV Stand, Giselle. For the payment, you can either transfer via PayPal or do a cash payment during pick up. As for the pick up, you can collect it from my place or we can meet at a mutual location. Just let me know what works best for you.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Zane Bennett, your task is to act/speak as Zane Bennett would, keeping in mind Zane Bennett's social goal.\nYou can find Zane Bennett's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Zane Bennett's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Zane Bennett's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person has put up their Bell\\'O TV Stand - Black Glass and Wood Trim for sale at $125.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. The item on sale is a beautiful 42\" Bell\\'O TV Stand, featuring black glass with an elegant wood trim. The stand measures 23 inches in height and 21 1/2 inches in depth.\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: \nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. Personality and values description: Zane Bennett is creative and outgoing, he values achievement and fairness. His decision-making is unique, often finding novel solutions to problems. Zane's secrets: He's secretly engaged to his best friend's ex.\nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Unknown\nZane Bennett's goal: You are the seller for this item, and your target price is $76.9. Please be aware that you may face a penalty if the item is sold for a price significantly lower than the target price. However, a bonus will be rewarded if you manage to sell it for more than the target price.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hey, Zane, I'm interested in the Bell'O TV Stand you have for sale. Can we discuss the price?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Hey Giselle! Sure, we can discuss the price. I have posted it for $125, but I am open for negotiations. What's your offer?\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I absolutely love the structure of the Bell'O TV Stand. But since I'm a student, I'm on a bit of a tight budget. Would you consider dropping it down to $112?\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"I totally understand your situation, Giselle. As a fellow creative, I appreciate the eye for design you've got. What do you say about $120? It's only a little more and trust me, this piece is worth it.\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Zane! I can see it's truly a remarkable piece. How about we meet halfway? Let's say, $116?\"\n\nTurn #5: Zane Bennett said: \"My goal with the pricing is also fairness, Giselle. And meeting at $116 sounds like exactly that. Let's seal the deal at this price. Looks like this TV Stand found a new home today!\"\n\nTurn #6: Giselle Rousseau said: \"That sounds perfect, Zane! I'm so excited the TV Stand is coming home with me. Let's seal the deal at $116. How do we arrange the payment and pick up?\"\n\nTurn #7: Zane Bennett said: \"I'm thrilled you love the TV Stand, Giselle. For the payment, you can either transfer via PayPal or do a cash payment during pick up. As for the pick up, you can collect it from my place or we can meet at a mutual location. Just let me know what works best for you.\"\n\nTurn #8: Giselle Rousseau said: \"That's great! I'll make a transfer via PayPal for the payment, and can we arrange the pick up at a mutual location? It's easier for me because I commute by bike.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Giselle. A mutual location sounds perfect. We can meet at the downtown public park if that's convenient for you. I'll send you my PayPal details for the payment. Once the payment is made, we can schedule the pick up. And congratulations again on the new TV Stand!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Zane Bennett, your task is to act/speak as Zane Bennett would, keeping in mind Zane Bennett's social goal.\nYou can find Zane Bennett's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Zane Bennett's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Zane Bennett's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person has put up their Bell\\'O TV Stand - Black Glass and Wood Trim for sale at $125.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. The item on sale is a beautiful 42\" Bell\\'O TV Stand, featuring black glass with an elegant wood trim. The stand measures 23 inches in height and 21 1/2 inches in depth.\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: \nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. Personality and values description: Zane Bennett is creative and outgoing, he values achievement and fairness. His decision-making is unique, often finding novel solutions to problems. Zane's secrets: He's secretly engaged to his best friend's ex.\nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Unknown\nZane Bennett's goal: You are the seller for this item, and your target price is $76.9. Please be aware that you may face a penalty if the item is sold for a price significantly lower than the target price. However, a bonus will be rewarded if you manage to sell it for more than the target price.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hey, Zane, I'm interested in the Bell'O TV Stand you have for sale. Can we discuss the price?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Hey Giselle! Sure, we can discuss the price. I have posted it for $125, but I am open for negotiations. What's your offer?\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I absolutely love the structure of the Bell'O TV Stand. But since I'm a student, I'm on a bit of a tight budget. Would you consider dropping it down to $112?\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"I totally understand your situation, Giselle. As a fellow creative, I appreciate the eye for design you've got. What do you say about $120? It's only a little more and trust me, this piece is worth it.\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Zane! I can see it's truly a remarkable piece. How about we meet halfway? Let's say, $116?\"\n\nTurn #5: Zane Bennett said: \"My goal with the pricing is also fairness, Giselle. And meeting at $116 sounds like exactly that. Let's seal the deal at this price. Looks like this TV Stand found a new home today!\"\n\nTurn #6: Giselle Rousseau said: \"That sounds perfect, Zane! I'm so excited the TV Stand is coming home with me. Let's seal the deal at $116. How do we arrange the payment and pick up?\"\n\nTurn #7: Zane Bennett said: \"I'm thrilled you love the TV Stand, Giselle. For the payment, you can either transfer via PayPal or do a cash payment during pick up. As for the pick up, you can collect it from my place or we can meet at a mutual location. Just let me know what works best for you.\"\n\nTurn #8: Giselle Rousseau said: \"That's great! I'll make a transfer via PayPal for the payment, and can we arrange the pick up at a mutual location? It's easier for me because I commute by bike.\"\n\nTurn #9: Zane Bennett said: \"Absolutely, Giselle. A mutual location sounds perfect. We can meet at the downtown public park if that's convenient for you. I'll send you my PayPal details for the payment. Once the payment is made, we can schedule the pick up. And congratulations again on the new TV Stand!\"\n\nTurn #10: Giselle Rousseau said: \"The downtown public park works perfectly for me, Zane! And I appreciate you sharing your PayPal details. I'm absolutely thrilled about this new addition to my home. Thanks again!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're very welcome, Giselle! I'm happy that the TV stand is going to someone who appreciates its design. Please feel free to reach out if you ever need anything else. Safe biking!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Zane Bennett, your task is to act/speak as Zane Bennett would, keeping in mind Zane Bennett's social goal.\nYou can find Zane Bennett's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Zane Bennett's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Zane Bennett's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person has put up their Bell\\'O TV Stand - Black Glass and Wood Trim for sale at $125.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. The item on sale is a beautiful 42\" Bell\\'O TV Stand, featuring black glass with an elegant wood trim. The stand measures 23 inches in height and 21 1/2 inches in depth.\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: \nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. Personality and values description: Zane Bennett is creative and outgoing, he values achievement and fairness. His decision-making is unique, often finding novel solutions to problems. Zane's secrets: He's secretly engaged to his best friend's ex.\nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Unknown\nZane Bennett's goal: You are the seller for this item, and your target price is $76.9. Please be aware that you may face a penalty if the item is sold for a price significantly lower than the target price. However, a bonus will be rewarded if you manage to sell it for more than the target price.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hey, Zane, I'm interested in the Bell'O TV Stand you have for sale. Can we discuss the price?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Hey Giselle! Sure, we can discuss the price. I have posted it for $125, but I am open for negotiations. What's your offer?\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I absolutely love the structure of the Bell'O TV Stand. But since I'm a student, I'm on a bit of a tight budget. Would you consider dropping it down to $112?\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"I totally understand your situation, Giselle. As a fellow creative, I appreciate the eye for design you've got. What do you say about $120? It's only a little more and trust me, this piece is worth it.\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Zane! I can see it's truly a remarkable piece. How about we meet halfway? Let's say, $116?\"\n\nTurn #5: Zane Bennett said: \"My goal with the pricing is also fairness, Giselle. And meeting at $116 sounds like exactly that. Let's seal the deal at this price. Looks like this TV Stand found a new home today!\"\n\nTurn #6: Giselle Rousseau said: \"That sounds perfect, Zane! I'm so excited the TV Stand is coming home with me. Let's seal the deal at $116. How do we arrange the payment and pick up?\"\n\nTurn #7: Zane Bennett said: \"I'm thrilled you love the TV Stand, Giselle. For the payment, you can either transfer via PayPal or do a cash payment during pick up. As for the pick up, you can collect it from my place or we can meet at a mutual location. Just let me know what works best for you.\"\n\nTurn #8: Giselle Rousseau said: \"That's great! I'll make a transfer via PayPal for the payment, and can we arrange the pick up at a mutual location? It's easier for me because I commute by bike.\"\n\nTurn #9: Zane Bennett said: \"Absolutely, Giselle. A mutual location sounds perfect. We can meet at the downtown public park if that's convenient for you. I'll send you my PayPal details for the payment. Once the payment is made, we can schedule the pick up. And congratulations again on the new TV Stand!\"\n\nTurn #10: Giselle Rousseau said: \"The downtown public park works perfectly for me, Zane! And I appreciate you sharing your PayPal details. I'm absolutely thrilled about this new addition to my home. Thanks again!\"\n\nTurn #11: Zane Bennett said: \"You're very welcome, Giselle! I'm happy that the TV stand is going to someone who appreciates its design. Please feel free to reach out if you ever need anything else. Safe biking!\"\n\nTurn #12: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Absolutely, Zane! It's been great doing business with you. I'll look forward to meeting you at the park. Biking is not only safe but also my favorite pastime. I really appreciate your understanding, take care!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nSamuel Anderson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMelissa: Hobby: Card collecting School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nOrlando: Hobby: BASE jumping School: St. Ambrose University \nSteven: Hobby: Knitting School: St. John's College-Santa Fe \nElizabeth: Hobby: Water sports School: St. John's College-Santa Fe \nMelaine: Hobby: Geocaching School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nCharles: Hobby: Ice hockey School: Saint Joseph's University \nStephanie: Hobby: Card collecting School: University of California, Davis \nWilliam: Hobby: Ice hockey School: St. Ambrose University \nJoe: Hobby: Blacksmithing School: Saint Joseph's University \nMicheline: Hobby: Shopping School: University of Hartford \nDylan: Hobby: Card collecting School: Tennessee State University \n\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey, Hendrick, nice to meet you. I'm Samuel, a software developer by trade but a cook at heart. So, do you have any particular hobbies or schools you attended? I've got a few friends that are into quite unusual activities and come from various educational backgrounds.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nSamuel Anderson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMelissa: Hobby: Card collecting School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nOrlando: Hobby: BASE jumping School: St. Ambrose University \nSteven: Hobby: Knitting School: St. John's College-Santa Fe \nElizabeth: Hobby: Water sports School: St. John's College-Santa Fe \nMelaine: Hobby: Geocaching School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nCharles: Hobby: Ice hockey School: Saint Joseph's University \nStephanie: Hobby: Card collecting School: University of California, Davis \nWilliam: Hobby: Ice hockey School: St. Ambrose University \nJoe: Hobby: Blacksmithing School: Saint Joseph's University \nMicheline: Hobby: Shopping School: University of Hartford \nDylan: Hobby: Card collecting School: Tennessee State University \n\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey, Hendrick, nice to meet you. I'm Samuel, a software developer by trade but a cook at heart. So, do you have any particular hobbies or schools you attended? I've got a few friends that are into quite unusual activities and come from various educational backgrounds.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Pleasure to meet you, Samuel. I've been diving into the world of culinary arts for quite some time now. It's always refreshing to meet another food enthusiast. As for my hobbies, well, I do enjoy hosting wine tasting nights, quite an interesting venture if I say so myself. Speaking of, a friend of mine, Jacob, is quite quirky; he is into card collecting. I wonder if you've come across something as unique in your circle?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's fantastic, Hendrick! Hosting wine tastings sounds truly sophisticated. Now that you mention it, I do have a couple of friends who share an interest in card collecting. One of them, Melissa, even studied at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. Did you, by any chance, attend a university in Texas?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nSamuel Anderson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMelissa: Hobby: Card collecting School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nOrlando: Hobby: BASE jumping School: St. Ambrose University \nSteven: Hobby: Knitting School: St. John's College-Santa Fe \nElizabeth: Hobby: Water sports School: St. John's College-Santa Fe \nMelaine: Hobby: Geocaching School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nCharles: Hobby: Ice hockey School: Saint Joseph's University \nStephanie: Hobby: Card collecting School: University of California, Davis \nWilliam: Hobby: Ice hockey School: St. Ambrose University \nJoe: Hobby: Blacksmithing School: Saint Joseph's University \nMicheline: Hobby: Shopping School: University of Hartford \nDylan: Hobby: Card collecting School: Tennessee State University \n\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey, Hendrick, nice to meet you. I'm Samuel, a software developer by trade but a cook at heart. So, do you have any particular hobbies or schools you attended? I've got a few friends that are into quite unusual activities and come from various educational backgrounds.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Pleasure to meet you, Samuel. I've been diving into the world of culinary arts for quite some time now. It's always refreshing to meet another food enthusiast. As for my hobbies, well, I do enjoy hosting wine tasting nights, quite an interesting venture if I say so myself. Speaking of, a friend of mine, Jacob, is quite quirky; he is into card collecting. I wonder if you've come across something as unique in your circle?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's fantastic, Hendrick! Hosting wine tastings sounds truly sophisticated. Now that you mention it, I do have a couple of friends who share an interest in card collecting. One of them, Melissa, even studied at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. Did you, by any chance, attend a university in Texas?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ah, Texas! It\u2019s lovely there, isn't it? However, I didn't study in Texas, but rather, a good friend of mine, Marjorie, did. She picked up a rather engaging hobby of foraging while she was at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. By any chance, would you happen to know any foragers?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Foraging, huh? That's quite an interesting hobby. I can't say I know any foragers, but it's impressive how diverse our circles can be, isn't it? Just to mention, another mate of mine, Steven, is a knitting enthusiast, and he studied at St. John's College-Santa Fe. Are you in any way familiar with that institution, Hendrick?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, Samuel, the diversity of our connections is fascinating! Knitting is an intriguing hobby. I don't personally know anyone who attended St. John's College-Santa Fe. However, speaking of hobbies, it reminds me of another one of my friends, Carrie. She has this distinctive hobby of geocaching, hidden treasures can be found everywhere! Do you know anyone into such a fascinating hobby?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oh, geocaching! What an adventure-filled hobby! I do know a friend, Melaine, who's into it. Interestingly, she also studied at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. Such a small world, right? Speaking of hobbies, I remember another buddy Charles is very passionate about ice hockey. He attended Saint Joseph's University. Have you ever caught a game there?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ice hockey, what a thrill! I can't say I've ever caught a game at Saint Joseph's University though. Speaking of sporting hobbies, I have a friend, Ronald, who is into weightlifting. Actually, he studied at Indiana University at South Bend. Have you ever heard of this university, Samuel?\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's cool, Hendrick! Weightlifting shows a lot of dedication. I don't know anyone from Indiana University at South Bend, though. However, one of my friends, Joe, is into blacksmithing, and he studied at Saint Joseph's University as well. Perhaps you know him or have crossed paths?\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Blacksmithing, now that's a unique pastime! I do know a chap, Johnnie, who has a similar passion. Interestingly, he studied at the University of Akron. Does that ring any bells, Samuel?\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Ah, the University of Akron. I must admit that it doesn't sound familiar. However, the uniqueness of blacksmithing really got me thinking of my other friends and their intriguing hobbies. One of my friends, Micheline, is really into shopping. Would you believe she studied at the University of Hartford? Sounds distinct, doesn't it, Hendrick?\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"The University of Hartford, ah, I haven't heard much about it, but what an interesting coincidence, Samuel! I also have a friend, Micheline, who is fond of shopping as well! Seems like we have our shared urbane connections.\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"What a striking coincidence, Hendrick! It's indeed a small world. So, another friend of mine, William, is an ice hockey lover and studied at St. Ambrose University. Do you have any links to that school?\"\n\nTurn #13: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's lovely, Samuel, hockey sure is a lively game! However, I must admit I don't have any connections with St. Ambrose University. Speaking of shared interests, I have another friend, Louis, who can't seem to resist shopping. He studied at Hesston College. Ever come across anyone from there?\"\n\nTurn #14: Samuel Anderson said: \"Shopping sure is a relaxing hobby! However, I haven't came across anyone from Hesston College. But speaking of connections, Dylan, another friend of mine who enjoys card collecting, studied at Tennessee State University. Are you familiar with anyone who attended that particular school, Hendrick?\"\n\nTurn #15: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's quite a coincidence, Samuel! Card collecting seems to have its charm, doesn't it? As for Tennessee State University, I know a friend, Carrie, who did attend there and has developed a keen interest in geocaching. It's a pleasure to see how hobbies transform people, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #16: Samuel Anderson said: \"Indeed, Hendrick, hobbies can lead to transformations in people's lives, right? Speaking of transformations, I don't know if you'll believe me, but I was once a competitive figure skater. The transitions from coding to cooking, and then to the ice rink, were quite fascinating. By the way, you mentioned Carrie from Tennessee State University earlier. I think we might have a friend in common, Dylan, who attended the same school and also enjoys card collecting. Small world, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #17: Hendrick Heinz said: \"What an amazing journey you've had, Samuel, from coding to cooking, and then to the ice rink! And yes, the world surely can be astonishingly small. It seems like Dylan and Carrie might be our common link in this intriguing network of ours. Quite the revelation at a pleasant gathering like this, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #18: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Hendrick! These gatherings always have a charming way of bringing people together. It's been great getting to know you. Let's catch up again and dig deeper into our shared network. Maybe we can explore our mutual interest in the culinary arts. Would you be up for that?\"\n\nTurn #19: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That sounds like a delightful plan, Samuel! I'd love to explore more about our shared interest and connections. Looking forward to our next meet. Until then, enjoy the party, my friend.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #20. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nSamuel Anderson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMelissa: Hobby: Card collecting School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nOrlando: Hobby: BASE jumping School: St. Ambrose University \nSteven: Hobby: Knitting School: St. John's College-Santa Fe \nElizabeth: Hobby: Water sports School: St. John's College-Santa Fe \nMelaine: Hobby: Geocaching School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nCharles: Hobby: Ice hockey School: Saint Joseph's University \nStephanie: Hobby: Card collecting School: University of California, Davis \nWilliam: Hobby: Ice hockey School: St. Ambrose University \nJoe: Hobby: Blacksmithing School: Saint Joseph's University \nMicheline: Hobby: Shopping School: University of Hartford \nDylan: Hobby: Card collecting School: Tennessee State University \n\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey, Hendrick, nice to meet you. I'm Samuel, a software developer by trade but a cook at heart. So, do you have any particular hobbies or schools you attended? I've got a few friends that are into quite unusual activities and come from various educational backgrounds.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Pleasure to meet you, Samuel. I've been diving into the world of culinary arts for quite some time now. It's always refreshing to meet another food enthusiast. As for my hobbies, well, I do enjoy hosting wine tasting nights, quite an interesting venture if I say so myself. Speaking of, a friend of mine, Jacob, is quite quirky; he is into card collecting. I wonder if you've come across something as unique in your circle?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's fantastic, Hendrick! Hosting wine tastings sounds truly sophisticated. Now that you mention it, I do have a couple of friends who share an interest in card collecting. One of them, Melissa, even studied at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. Did you, by any chance, attend a university in Texas?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ah, Texas! It\u2019s lovely there, isn't it? However, I didn't study in Texas, but rather, a good friend of mine, Marjorie, did. She picked up a rather engaging hobby of foraging while she was at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. By any chance, would you happen to know any foragers?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Foraging, huh? That's quite an interesting hobby. I can't say I know any foragers, but it's impressive how diverse our circles can be, isn't it? Just to mention, another mate of mine, Steven, is a knitting enthusiast, and he studied at St. John's College-Santa Fe. Are you in any way familiar with that institution, Hendrick?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nSamuel Anderson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMelissa: Hobby: Card collecting School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nOrlando: Hobby: BASE jumping School: St. Ambrose University \nSteven: Hobby: Knitting School: St. John's College-Santa Fe \nElizabeth: Hobby: Water sports School: St. John's College-Santa Fe \nMelaine: Hobby: Geocaching School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nCharles: Hobby: Ice hockey School: Saint Joseph's University \nStephanie: Hobby: Card collecting School: University of California, Davis \nWilliam: Hobby: Ice hockey School: St. Ambrose University \nJoe: Hobby: Blacksmithing School: Saint Joseph's University \nMicheline: Hobby: Shopping School: University of Hartford \nDylan: Hobby: Card collecting School: Tennessee State University \n\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey, Hendrick, nice to meet you. I'm Samuel, a software developer by trade but a cook at heart. So, do you have any particular hobbies or schools you attended? I've got a few friends that are into quite unusual activities and come from various educational backgrounds.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Pleasure to meet you, Samuel. I've been diving into the world of culinary arts for quite some time now. It's always refreshing to meet another food enthusiast. As for my hobbies, well, I do enjoy hosting wine tasting nights, quite an interesting venture if I say so myself. Speaking of, a friend of mine, Jacob, is quite quirky; he is into card collecting. I wonder if you've come across something as unique in your circle?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's fantastic, Hendrick! Hosting wine tastings sounds truly sophisticated. Now that you mention it, I do have a couple of friends who share an interest in card collecting. One of them, Melissa, even studied at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. Did you, by any chance, attend a university in Texas?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ah, Texas! It\u2019s lovely there, isn't it? However, I didn't study in Texas, but rather, a good friend of mine, Marjorie, did. She picked up a rather engaging hobby of foraging while she was at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. By any chance, would you happen to know any foragers?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Foraging, huh? That's quite an interesting hobby. I can't say I know any foragers, but it's impressive how diverse our circles can be, isn't it? Just to mention, another mate of mine, Steven, is a knitting enthusiast, and he studied at St. John's College-Santa Fe. Are you in any way familiar with that institution, Hendrick?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, Samuel, the diversity of our connections is fascinating! Knitting is an intriguing hobby. I don't personally know anyone who attended St. John's College-Santa Fe. However, speaking of hobbies, it reminds me of another one of my friends, Carrie. She has this distinctive hobby of geocaching, hidden treasures can be found everywhere! Do you know anyone into such a fascinating hobby?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oh, geocaching! What an adventure-filled hobby! I do know a friend, Melaine, who's into it. Interestingly, she also studied at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. Such a small world, right? Speaking of hobbies, I remember another buddy Charles is very passionate about ice hockey. He attended Saint Joseph's University. Have you ever caught a game there?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nSamuel Anderson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMelissa: Hobby: Card collecting School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nOrlando: Hobby: BASE jumping School: St. Ambrose University \nSteven: Hobby: Knitting School: St. John's College-Santa Fe \nElizabeth: Hobby: Water sports School: St. John's College-Santa Fe \nMelaine: Hobby: Geocaching School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nCharles: Hobby: Ice hockey School: Saint Joseph's University \nStephanie: Hobby: Card collecting School: University of California, Davis \nWilliam: Hobby: Ice hockey School: St. Ambrose University \nJoe: Hobby: Blacksmithing School: Saint Joseph's University \nMicheline: Hobby: Shopping School: University of Hartford \nDylan: Hobby: Card collecting School: Tennessee State University \n\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey, Hendrick, nice to meet you. I'm Samuel, a software developer by trade but a cook at heart. So, do you have any particular hobbies or schools you attended? I've got a few friends that are into quite unusual activities and come from various educational backgrounds.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Pleasure to meet you, Samuel. I've been diving into the world of culinary arts for quite some time now. It's always refreshing to meet another food enthusiast. As for my hobbies, well, I do enjoy hosting wine tasting nights, quite an interesting venture if I say so myself. Speaking of, a friend of mine, Jacob, is quite quirky; he is into card collecting. I wonder if you've come across something as unique in your circle?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's fantastic, Hendrick! Hosting wine tastings sounds truly sophisticated. Now that you mention it, I do have a couple of friends who share an interest in card collecting. One of them, Melissa, even studied at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. Did you, by any chance, attend a university in Texas?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ah, Texas! It\u2019s lovely there, isn't it? However, I didn't study in Texas, but rather, a good friend of mine, Marjorie, did. She picked up a rather engaging hobby of foraging while she was at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. By any chance, would you happen to know any foragers?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Foraging, huh? That's quite an interesting hobby. I can't say I know any foragers, but it's impressive how diverse our circles can be, isn't it? Just to mention, another mate of mine, Steven, is a knitting enthusiast, and he studied at St. John's College-Santa Fe. Are you in any way familiar with that institution, Hendrick?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, Samuel, the diversity of our connections is fascinating! Knitting is an intriguing hobby. I don't personally know anyone who attended St. John's College-Santa Fe. However, speaking of hobbies, it reminds me of another one of my friends, Carrie. She has this distinctive hobby of geocaching, hidden treasures can be found everywhere! Do you know anyone into such a fascinating hobby?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oh, geocaching! What an adventure-filled hobby! I do know a friend, Melaine, who's into it. Interestingly, she also studied at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. Such a small world, right? Speaking of hobbies, I remember another buddy Charles is very passionate about ice hockey. He attended Saint Joseph's University. Have you ever caught a game there?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ice hockey, what a thrill! I can't say I've ever caught a game at Saint Joseph's University though. Speaking of sporting hobbies, I have a friend, Ronald, who is into weightlifting. Actually, he studied at Indiana University at South Bend. Have you ever heard of this university, Samuel?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's cool, Hendrick! Weightlifting shows a lot of dedication. I don't know anyone from Indiana University at South Bend, though. However, one of my friends, Joe, is into blacksmithing, and he studied at Saint Joseph's University as well. Perhaps you know him or have crossed paths?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nSamuel Anderson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMelissa: Hobby: Card collecting School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nOrlando: Hobby: BASE jumping School: St. Ambrose University \nSteven: Hobby: Knitting School: St. John's College-Santa Fe \nElizabeth: Hobby: Water sports School: St. John's College-Santa Fe \nMelaine: Hobby: Geocaching School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nCharles: Hobby: Ice hockey School: Saint Joseph's University \nStephanie: Hobby: Card collecting School: University of California, Davis \nWilliam: Hobby: Ice hockey School: St. Ambrose University \nJoe: Hobby: Blacksmithing School: Saint Joseph's University \nMicheline: Hobby: Shopping School: University of Hartford \nDylan: Hobby: Card collecting School: Tennessee State University \n\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey, Hendrick, nice to meet you. I'm Samuel, a software developer by trade but a cook at heart. So, do you have any particular hobbies or schools you attended? I've got a few friends that are into quite unusual activities and come from various educational backgrounds.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Pleasure to meet you, Samuel. I've been diving into the world of culinary arts for quite some time now. It's always refreshing to meet another food enthusiast. As for my hobbies, well, I do enjoy hosting wine tasting nights, quite an interesting venture if I say so myself. Speaking of, a friend of mine, Jacob, is quite quirky; he is into card collecting. I wonder if you've come across something as unique in your circle?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's fantastic, Hendrick! Hosting wine tastings sounds truly sophisticated. Now that you mention it, I do have a couple of friends who share an interest in card collecting. One of them, Melissa, even studied at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. Did you, by any chance, attend a university in Texas?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ah, Texas! It\u2019s lovely there, isn't it? However, I didn't study in Texas, but rather, a good friend of mine, Marjorie, did. She picked up a rather engaging hobby of foraging while she was at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. By any chance, would you happen to know any foragers?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Foraging, huh? That's quite an interesting hobby. I can't say I know any foragers, but it's impressive how diverse our circles can be, isn't it? Just to mention, another mate of mine, Steven, is a knitting enthusiast, and he studied at St. John's College-Santa Fe. Are you in any way familiar with that institution, Hendrick?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, Samuel, the diversity of our connections is fascinating! Knitting is an intriguing hobby. I don't personally know anyone who attended St. John's College-Santa Fe. However, speaking of hobbies, it reminds me of another one of my friends, Carrie. She has this distinctive hobby of geocaching, hidden treasures can be found everywhere! Do you know anyone into such a fascinating hobby?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oh, geocaching! What an adventure-filled hobby! I do know a friend, Melaine, who's into it. Interestingly, she also studied at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. Such a small world, right? Speaking of hobbies, I remember another buddy Charles is very passionate about ice hockey. He attended Saint Joseph's University. Have you ever caught a game there?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ice hockey, what a thrill! I can't say I've ever caught a game at Saint Joseph's University though. Speaking of sporting hobbies, I have a friend, Ronald, who is into weightlifting. Actually, he studied at Indiana University at South Bend. Have you ever heard of this university, Samuel?\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's cool, Hendrick! Weightlifting shows a lot of dedication. I don't know anyone from Indiana University at South Bend, though. However, one of my friends, Joe, is into blacksmithing, and he studied at Saint Joseph's University as well. Perhaps you know him or have crossed paths?\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Blacksmithing, now that's a unique pastime! I do know a chap, Johnnie, who has a similar passion. Interestingly, he studied at the University of Akron. Does that ring any bells, Samuel?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ah, the University of Akron. I must admit that it doesn't sound familiar. However, the uniqueness of blacksmithing really got me thinking of my other friends and their intriguing hobbies. One of my friends, Micheline, is really into shopping. Would you believe she studied at the University of Hartford? Sounds distinct, doesn't it, Hendrick?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nSamuel Anderson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMelissa: Hobby: Card collecting School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nOrlando: Hobby: BASE jumping School: St. Ambrose University \nSteven: Hobby: Knitting School: St. John's College-Santa Fe \nElizabeth: Hobby: Water sports School: St. John's College-Santa Fe \nMelaine: Hobby: Geocaching School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nCharles: Hobby: Ice hockey School: Saint Joseph's University \nStephanie: Hobby: Card collecting School: University of California, Davis \nWilliam: Hobby: Ice hockey School: St. Ambrose University \nJoe: Hobby: Blacksmithing School: Saint Joseph's University \nMicheline: Hobby: Shopping School: University of Hartford \nDylan: Hobby: Card collecting School: Tennessee State University \n\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey, Hendrick, nice to meet you. I'm Samuel, a software developer by trade but a cook at heart. So, do you have any particular hobbies or schools you attended? I've got a few friends that are into quite unusual activities and come from various educational backgrounds.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Pleasure to meet you, Samuel. I've been diving into the world of culinary arts for quite some time now. It's always refreshing to meet another food enthusiast. As for my hobbies, well, I do enjoy hosting wine tasting nights, quite an interesting venture if I say so myself. Speaking of, a friend of mine, Jacob, is quite quirky; he is into card collecting. I wonder if you've come across something as unique in your circle?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's fantastic, Hendrick! Hosting wine tastings sounds truly sophisticated. Now that you mention it, I do have a couple of friends who share an interest in card collecting. One of them, Melissa, even studied at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. Did you, by any chance, attend a university in Texas?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ah, Texas! It\u2019s lovely there, isn't it? However, I didn't study in Texas, but rather, a good friend of mine, Marjorie, did. She picked up a rather engaging hobby of foraging while she was at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. By any chance, would you happen to know any foragers?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Foraging, huh? That's quite an interesting hobby. I can't say I know any foragers, but it's impressive how diverse our circles can be, isn't it? Just to mention, another mate of mine, Steven, is a knitting enthusiast, and he studied at St. John's College-Santa Fe. Are you in any way familiar with that institution, Hendrick?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, Samuel, the diversity of our connections is fascinating! Knitting is an intriguing hobby. I don't personally know anyone who attended St. John's College-Santa Fe. However, speaking of hobbies, it reminds me of another one of my friends, Carrie. She has this distinctive hobby of geocaching, hidden treasures can be found everywhere! Do you know anyone into such a fascinating hobby?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oh, geocaching! What an adventure-filled hobby! I do know a friend, Melaine, who's into it. Interestingly, she also studied at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. Such a small world, right? Speaking of hobbies, I remember another buddy Charles is very passionate about ice hockey. He attended Saint Joseph's University. Have you ever caught a game there?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ice hockey, what a thrill! I can't say I've ever caught a game at Saint Joseph's University though. Speaking of sporting hobbies, I have a friend, Ronald, who is into weightlifting. Actually, he studied at Indiana University at South Bend. Have you ever heard of this university, Samuel?\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's cool, Hendrick! Weightlifting shows a lot of dedication. I don't know anyone from Indiana University at South Bend, though. However, one of my friends, Joe, is into blacksmithing, and he studied at Saint Joseph's University as well. Perhaps you know him or have crossed paths?\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Blacksmithing, now that's a unique pastime! I do know a chap, Johnnie, who has a similar passion. Interestingly, he studied at the University of Akron. Does that ring any bells, Samuel?\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Ah, the University of Akron. I must admit that it doesn't sound familiar. However, the uniqueness of blacksmithing really got me thinking of my other friends and their intriguing hobbies. One of my friends, Micheline, is really into shopping. Would you believe she studied at the University of Hartford? Sounds distinct, doesn't it, Hendrick?\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"The University of Hartford, ah, I haven't heard much about it, but what an interesting coincidence, Samuel! I also have a friend, Micheline, who is fond of shopping as well! Seems like we have our shared urbane connections.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"What a striking coincidence, Hendrick! It's indeed a small world. So, another friend of mine, William, is an ice hockey lover and studied at St. Ambrose University. Do you have any links to that school?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nSamuel Anderson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMelissa: Hobby: Card collecting School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nOrlando: Hobby: BASE jumping School: St. Ambrose University \nSteven: Hobby: Knitting School: St. John's College-Santa Fe \nElizabeth: Hobby: Water sports School: St. John's College-Santa Fe \nMelaine: Hobby: Geocaching School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nCharles: Hobby: Ice hockey School: Saint Joseph's University \nStephanie: Hobby: Card collecting School: University of California, Davis \nWilliam: Hobby: Ice hockey School: St. Ambrose University \nJoe: Hobby: Blacksmithing School: Saint Joseph's University \nMicheline: Hobby: Shopping School: University of Hartford \nDylan: Hobby: Card collecting School: Tennessee State University \n\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey, Hendrick, nice to meet you. I'm Samuel, a software developer by trade but a cook at heart. So, do you have any particular hobbies or schools you attended? I've got a few friends that are into quite unusual activities and come from various educational backgrounds.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Pleasure to meet you, Samuel. I've been diving into the world of culinary arts for quite some time now. It's always refreshing to meet another food enthusiast. As for my hobbies, well, I do enjoy hosting wine tasting nights, quite an interesting venture if I say so myself. Speaking of, a friend of mine, Jacob, is quite quirky; he is into card collecting. I wonder if you've come across something as unique in your circle?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's fantastic, Hendrick! Hosting wine tastings sounds truly sophisticated. Now that you mention it, I do have a couple of friends who share an interest in card collecting. One of them, Melissa, even studied at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. Did you, by any chance, attend a university in Texas?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ah, Texas! It\u2019s lovely there, isn't it? However, I didn't study in Texas, but rather, a good friend of mine, Marjorie, did. She picked up a rather engaging hobby of foraging while she was at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. By any chance, would you happen to know any foragers?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Foraging, huh? That's quite an interesting hobby. I can't say I know any foragers, but it's impressive how diverse our circles can be, isn't it? Just to mention, another mate of mine, Steven, is a knitting enthusiast, and he studied at St. John's College-Santa Fe. Are you in any way familiar with that institution, Hendrick?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, Samuel, the diversity of our connections is fascinating! Knitting is an intriguing hobby. I don't personally know anyone who attended St. John's College-Santa Fe. However, speaking of hobbies, it reminds me of another one of my friends, Carrie. She has this distinctive hobby of geocaching, hidden treasures can be found everywhere! Do you know anyone into such a fascinating hobby?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oh, geocaching! What an adventure-filled hobby! I do know a friend, Melaine, who's into it. Interestingly, she also studied at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. Such a small world, right? Speaking of hobbies, I remember another buddy Charles is very passionate about ice hockey. He attended Saint Joseph's University. Have you ever caught a game there?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ice hockey, what a thrill! I can't say I've ever caught a game at Saint Joseph's University though. Speaking of sporting hobbies, I have a friend, Ronald, who is into weightlifting. Actually, he studied at Indiana University at South Bend. Have you ever heard of this university, Samuel?\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's cool, Hendrick! Weightlifting shows a lot of dedication. I don't know anyone from Indiana University at South Bend, though. However, one of my friends, Joe, is into blacksmithing, and he studied at Saint Joseph's University as well. Perhaps you know him or have crossed paths?\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Blacksmithing, now that's a unique pastime! I do know a chap, Johnnie, who has a similar passion. Interestingly, he studied at the University of Akron. Does that ring any bells, Samuel?\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Ah, the University of Akron. I must admit that it doesn't sound familiar. However, the uniqueness of blacksmithing really got me thinking of my other friends and their intriguing hobbies. One of my friends, Micheline, is really into shopping. Would you believe she studied at the University of Hartford? Sounds distinct, doesn't it, Hendrick?\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"The University of Hartford, ah, I haven't heard much about it, but what an interesting coincidence, Samuel! I also have a friend, Micheline, who is fond of shopping as well! Seems like we have our shared urbane connections.\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"What a striking coincidence, Hendrick! It's indeed a small world. So, another friend of mine, William, is an ice hockey lover and studied at St. Ambrose University. Do you have any links to that school?\"\n\nTurn #13: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's lovely, Samuel, hockey sure is a lively game! However, I must admit I don't have any connections with St. Ambrose University. Speaking of shared interests, I have another friend, Louis, who can't seem to resist shopping. He studied at Hesston College. Ever come across anyone from there?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Shopping sure is a relaxing hobby! However, I haven't came across anyone from Hesston College. But speaking of connections, Dylan, another friend of mine who enjoys card collecting, studied at Tennessee State University. Are you familiar with anyone who attended that particular school, Hendrick?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nSamuel Anderson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMelissa: Hobby: Card collecting School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nOrlando: Hobby: BASE jumping School: St. Ambrose University \nSteven: Hobby: Knitting School: St. John's College-Santa Fe \nElizabeth: Hobby: Water sports School: St. John's College-Santa Fe \nMelaine: Hobby: Geocaching School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nCharles: Hobby: Ice hockey School: Saint Joseph's University \nStephanie: Hobby: Card collecting School: University of California, Davis \nWilliam: Hobby: Ice hockey School: St. Ambrose University \nJoe: Hobby: Blacksmithing School: Saint Joseph's University \nMicheline: Hobby: Shopping School: University of Hartford \nDylan: Hobby: Card collecting School: Tennessee State University \n\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey, Hendrick, nice to meet you. I'm Samuel, a software developer by trade but a cook at heart. So, do you have any particular hobbies or schools you attended? I've got a few friends that are into quite unusual activities and come from various educational backgrounds.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Pleasure to meet you, Samuel. I've been diving into the world of culinary arts for quite some time now. It's always refreshing to meet another food enthusiast. As for my hobbies, well, I do enjoy hosting wine tasting nights, quite an interesting venture if I say so myself. Speaking of, a friend of mine, Jacob, is quite quirky; he is into card collecting. I wonder if you've come across something as unique in your circle?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's fantastic, Hendrick! Hosting wine tastings sounds truly sophisticated. Now that you mention it, I do have a couple of friends who share an interest in card collecting. One of them, Melissa, even studied at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. Did you, by any chance, attend a university in Texas?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ah, Texas! It\u2019s lovely there, isn't it? However, I didn't study in Texas, but rather, a good friend of mine, Marjorie, did. She picked up a rather engaging hobby of foraging while she was at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. By any chance, would you happen to know any foragers?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Foraging, huh? That's quite an interesting hobby. I can't say I know any foragers, but it's impressive how diverse our circles can be, isn't it? Just to mention, another mate of mine, Steven, is a knitting enthusiast, and he studied at St. John's College-Santa Fe. Are you in any way familiar with that institution, Hendrick?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, Samuel, the diversity of our connections is fascinating! Knitting is an intriguing hobby. I don't personally know anyone who attended St. John's College-Santa Fe. However, speaking of hobbies, it reminds me of another one of my friends, Carrie. She has this distinctive hobby of geocaching, hidden treasures can be found everywhere! Do you know anyone into such a fascinating hobby?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oh, geocaching! What an adventure-filled hobby! I do know a friend, Melaine, who's into it. Interestingly, she also studied at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. Such a small world, right? Speaking of hobbies, I remember another buddy Charles is very passionate about ice hockey. He attended Saint Joseph's University. Have you ever caught a game there?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ice hockey, what a thrill! I can't say I've ever caught a game at Saint Joseph's University though. Speaking of sporting hobbies, I have a friend, Ronald, who is into weightlifting. Actually, he studied at Indiana University at South Bend. Have you ever heard of this university, Samuel?\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's cool, Hendrick! Weightlifting shows a lot of dedication. I don't know anyone from Indiana University at South Bend, though. However, one of my friends, Joe, is into blacksmithing, and he studied at Saint Joseph's University as well. Perhaps you know him or have crossed paths?\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Blacksmithing, now that's a unique pastime! I do know a chap, Johnnie, who has a similar passion. Interestingly, he studied at the University of Akron. Does that ring any bells, Samuel?\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Ah, the University of Akron. I must admit that it doesn't sound familiar. However, the uniqueness of blacksmithing really got me thinking of my other friends and their intriguing hobbies. One of my friends, Micheline, is really into shopping. Would you believe she studied at the University of Hartford? Sounds distinct, doesn't it, Hendrick?\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"The University of Hartford, ah, I haven't heard much about it, but what an interesting coincidence, Samuel! I also have a friend, Micheline, who is fond of shopping as well! Seems like we have our shared urbane connections.\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"What a striking coincidence, Hendrick! It's indeed a small world. So, another friend of mine, William, is an ice hockey lover and studied at St. Ambrose University. Do you have any links to that school?\"\n\nTurn #13: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's lovely, Samuel, hockey sure is a lively game! However, I must admit I don't have any connections with St. Ambrose University. Speaking of shared interests, I have another friend, Louis, who can't seem to resist shopping. He studied at Hesston College. Ever come across anyone from there?\"\n\nTurn #14: Samuel Anderson said: \"Shopping sure is a relaxing hobby! However, I haven't came across anyone from Hesston College. But speaking of connections, Dylan, another friend of mine who enjoys card collecting, studied at Tennessee State University. Are you familiar with anyone who attended that particular school, Hendrick?\"\n\nTurn #15: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's quite a coincidence, Samuel! Card collecting seems to have its charm, doesn't it? As for Tennessee State University, I know a friend, Carrie, who did attend there and has developed a keen interest in geocaching. It's a pleasure to see how hobbies transform people, isn't it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, Hendrick, hobbies can lead to transformations in people's lives, right? Speaking of transformations, I don't know if you'll believe me, but I was once a competitive figure skater. The transitions from coding to cooking, and then to the ice rink, were quite fascinating. By the way, you mentioned Carrie from Tennessee State University earlier. I think we might have a friend in common, Dylan, who attended the same school and also enjoys card collecting. Small world, isn't it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nSamuel Anderson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMelissa: Hobby: Card collecting School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nOrlando: Hobby: BASE jumping School: St. Ambrose University \nSteven: Hobby: Knitting School: St. John's College-Santa Fe \nElizabeth: Hobby: Water sports School: St. John's College-Santa Fe \nMelaine: Hobby: Geocaching School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nCharles: Hobby: Ice hockey School: Saint Joseph's University \nStephanie: Hobby: Card collecting School: University of California, Davis \nWilliam: Hobby: Ice hockey School: St. Ambrose University \nJoe: Hobby: Blacksmithing School: Saint Joseph's University \nMicheline: Hobby: Shopping School: University of Hartford \nDylan: Hobby: Card collecting School: Tennessee State University \n\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey, Hendrick, nice to meet you. I'm Samuel, a software developer by trade but a cook at heart. So, do you have any particular hobbies or schools you attended? I've got a few friends that are into quite unusual activities and come from various educational backgrounds.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Pleasure to meet you, Samuel. I've been diving into the world of culinary arts for quite some time now. It's always refreshing to meet another food enthusiast. As for my hobbies, well, I do enjoy hosting wine tasting nights, quite an interesting venture if I say so myself. Speaking of, a friend of mine, Jacob, is quite quirky; he is into card collecting. I wonder if you've come across something as unique in your circle?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's fantastic, Hendrick! Hosting wine tastings sounds truly sophisticated. Now that you mention it, I do have a couple of friends who share an interest in card collecting. One of them, Melissa, even studied at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. Did you, by any chance, attend a university in Texas?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ah, Texas! It\u2019s lovely there, isn't it? However, I didn't study in Texas, but rather, a good friend of mine, Marjorie, did. She picked up a rather engaging hobby of foraging while she was at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. By any chance, would you happen to know any foragers?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Foraging, huh? That's quite an interesting hobby. I can't say I know any foragers, but it's impressive how diverse our circles can be, isn't it? Just to mention, another mate of mine, Steven, is a knitting enthusiast, and he studied at St. John's College-Santa Fe. Are you in any way familiar with that institution, Hendrick?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, Samuel, the diversity of our connections is fascinating! Knitting is an intriguing hobby. I don't personally know anyone who attended St. John's College-Santa Fe. However, speaking of hobbies, it reminds me of another one of my friends, Carrie. She has this distinctive hobby of geocaching, hidden treasures can be found everywhere! Do you know anyone into such a fascinating hobby?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oh, geocaching! What an adventure-filled hobby! I do know a friend, Melaine, who's into it. Interestingly, she also studied at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. Such a small world, right? Speaking of hobbies, I remember another buddy Charles is very passionate about ice hockey. He attended Saint Joseph's University. Have you ever caught a game there?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ice hockey, what a thrill! I can't say I've ever caught a game at Saint Joseph's University though. Speaking of sporting hobbies, I have a friend, Ronald, who is into weightlifting. Actually, he studied at Indiana University at South Bend. Have you ever heard of this university, Samuel?\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's cool, Hendrick! Weightlifting shows a lot of dedication. I don't know anyone from Indiana University at South Bend, though. However, one of my friends, Joe, is into blacksmithing, and he studied at Saint Joseph's University as well. Perhaps you know him or have crossed paths?\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Blacksmithing, now that's a unique pastime! I do know a chap, Johnnie, who has a similar passion. Interestingly, he studied at the University of Akron. Does that ring any bells, Samuel?\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Ah, the University of Akron. I must admit that it doesn't sound familiar. However, the uniqueness of blacksmithing really got me thinking of my other friends and their intriguing hobbies. One of my friends, Micheline, is really into shopping. Would you believe she studied at the University of Hartford? Sounds distinct, doesn't it, Hendrick?\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"The University of Hartford, ah, I haven't heard much about it, but what an interesting coincidence, Samuel! I also have a friend, Micheline, who is fond of shopping as well! Seems like we have our shared urbane connections.\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"What a striking coincidence, Hendrick! It's indeed a small world. So, another friend of mine, William, is an ice hockey lover and studied at St. Ambrose University. Do you have any links to that school?\"\n\nTurn #13: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's lovely, Samuel, hockey sure is a lively game! However, I must admit I don't have any connections with St. Ambrose University. Speaking of shared interests, I have another friend, Louis, who can't seem to resist shopping. He studied at Hesston College. Ever come across anyone from there?\"\n\nTurn #14: Samuel Anderson said: \"Shopping sure is a relaxing hobby! However, I haven't came across anyone from Hesston College. But speaking of connections, Dylan, another friend of mine who enjoys card collecting, studied at Tennessee State University. Are you familiar with anyone who attended that particular school, Hendrick?\"\n\nTurn #15: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's quite a coincidence, Samuel! Card collecting seems to have its charm, doesn't it? As for Tennessee State University, I know a friend, Carrie, who did attend there and has developed a keen interest in geocaching. It's a pleasure to see how hobbies transform people, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #16: Samuel Anderson said: \"Indeed, Hendrick, hobbies can lead to transformations in people's lives, right? Speaking of transformations, I don't know if you'll believe me, but I was once a competitive figure skater. The transitions from coding to cooking, and then to the ice rink, were quite fascinating. By the way, you mentioned Carrie from Tennessee State University earlier. I think we might have a friend in common, Dylan, who attended the same school and also enjoys card collecting. Small world, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #17: Hendrick Heinz said: \"What an amazing journey you've had, Samuel, from coding to cooking, and then to the ice rink! And yes, the world surely can be astonishingly small. It seems like Dylan and Carrie might be our common link in this intriguing network of ours. Quite the revelation at a pleasant gathering like this, isn't it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #18. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Hendrick! These gatherings always have a charming way of bringing people together. It's been great getting to know you. Let's catch up again and dig deeper into our shared network. Maybe we can explore our mutual interest in the culinary arts. Would you be up for that?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nJacob: Hobby: Card collecting School: Whittier College \nMarjorie: Hobby: Foraging School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nCarrie: Hobby: Geocaching School: Tennessee State University \nLouis: Hobby: Shopping School: Hesston College \nMicheline: Hobby: Shopping School: University of Hartford \nEva: Hobby: Geocaching School: Hesston College \nJohnnie: Hobby: Blacksmithing School: University of Akron \nJohn: Hobby: Foraging School: University of California, Davis \nRonald: Hobby: Weightlifting School: Indiana University at South Bend \nCynthia: Hobby: Lacrosse School: Kansas State University \nRobert: Hobby: Water sports School: University of Akron\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey, Hendrick, nice to meet you. I'm Samuel, a software developer by trade but a cook at heart. So, do you have any particular hobbies or schools you attended? I've got a few friends that are into quite unusual activities and come from various educational backgrounds.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Pleasure to meet you, Samuel. I've been diving into the world of culinary arts for quite some time now. It's always refreshing to meet another food enthusiast. As for my hobbies, well, I do enjoy hosting wine tasting nights, quite an interesting venture if I say so myself. Speaking of, a friend of mine, Jacob, is quite quirky; he is into card collecting. I wonder if you've come across something as unique in your circle?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nJacob: Hobby: Card collecting School: Whittier College \nMarjorie: Hobby: Foraging School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nCarrie: Hobby: Geocaching School: Tennessee State University \nLouis: Hobby: Shopping School: Hesston College \nMicheline: Hobby: Shopping School: University of Hartford \nEva: Hobby: Geocaching School: Hesston College \nJohnnie: Hobby: Blacksmithing School: University of Akron \nJohn: Hobby: Foraging School: University of California, Davis \nRonald: Hobby: Weightlifting School: Indiana University at South Bend \nCynthia: Hobby: Lacrosse School: Kansas State University \nRobert: Hobby: Water sports School: University of Akron\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey, Hendrick, nice to meet you. I'm Samuel, a software developer by trade but a cook at heart. So, do you have any particular hobbies or schools you attended? I've got a few friends that are into quite unusual activities and come from various educational backgrounds.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Pleasure to meet you, Samuel. I've been diving into the world of culinary arts for quite some time now. It's always refreshing to meet another food enthusiast. As for my hobbies, well, I do enjoy hosting wine tasting nights, quite an interesting venture if I say so myself. Speaking of, a friend of mine, Jacob, is quite quirky; he is into card collecting. I wonder if you've come across something as unique in your circle?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's fantastic, Hendrick! Hosting wine tastings sounds truly sophisticated. Now that you mention it, I do have a couple of friends who share an interest in card collecting. One of them, Melissa, even studied at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. Did you, by any chance, attend a university in Texas?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ah, Texas! It\u2019s lovely there, isn't it? However, I didn't study in Texas, but rather, a good friend of mine, Marjorie, did. She picked up a rather engaging hobby of foraging while she was at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. By any chance, would you happen to know any foragers?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nJacob: Hobby: Card collecting School: Whittier College \nMarjorie: Hobby: Foraging School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nCarrie: Hobby: Geocaching School: Tennessee State University \nLouis: Hobby: Shopping School: Hesston College \nMicheline: Hobby: Shopping School: University of Hartford \nEva: Hobby: Geocaching School: Hesston College \nJohnnie: Hobby: Blacksmithing School: University of Akron \nJohn: Hobby: Foraging School: University of California, Davis \nRonald: Hobby: Weightlifting School: Indiana University at South Bend \nCynthia: Hobby: Lacrosse School: Kansas State University \nRobert: Hobby: Water sports School: University of Akron\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey, Hendrick, nice to meet you. I'm Samuel, a software developer by trade but a cook at heart. So, do you have any particular hobbies or schools you attended? I've got a few friends that are into quite unusual activities and come from various educational backgrounds.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Pleasure to meet you, Samuel. I've been diving into the world of culinary arts for quite some time now. It's always refreshing to meet another food enthusiast. As for my hobbies, well, I do enjoy hosting wine tasting nights, quite an interesting venture if I say so myself. Speaking of, a friend of mine, Jacob, is quite quirky; he is into card collecting. I wonder if you've come across something as unique in your circle?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's fantastic, Hendrick! Hosting wine tastings sounds truly sophisticated. Now that you mention it, I do have a couple of friends who share an interest in card collecting. One of them, Melissa, even studied at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. Did you, by any chance, attend a university in Texas?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ah, Texas! It\u2019s lovely there, isn't it? However, I didn't study in Texas, but rather, a good friend of mine, Marjorie, did. She picked up a rather engaging hobby of foraging while she was at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. By any chance, would you happen to know any foragers?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Foraging, huh? That's quite an interesting hobby. I can't say I know any foragers, but it's impressive how diverse our circles can be, isn't it? Just to mention, another mate of mine, Steven, is a knitting enthusiast, and he studied at St. John's College-Santa Fe. Are you in any way familiar with that institution, Hendrick?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, Samuel, the diversity of our connections is fascinating! Knitting is an intriguing hobby. I don't personally know anyone who attended St. John's College-Santa Fe. However, speaking of hobbies, it reminds me of another one of my friends, Carrie. She has this distinctive hobby of geocaching, hidden treasures can be found everywhere! Do you know anyone into such a fascinating hobby?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oh, geocaching! What an adventure-filled hobby! I do know a friend, Melaine, who's into it. Interestingly, she also studied at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. Such a small world, right? Speaking of hobbies, I remember another buddy Charles is very passionate about ice hockey. He attended Saint Joseph's University. Have you ever caught a game there?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ice hockey, what a thrill! I can't say I've ever caught a game at Saint Joseph's University though. Speaking of sporting hobbies, I have a friend, Ronald, who is into weightlifting. Actually, he studied at Indiana University at South Bend. Have you ever heard of this university, Samuel?\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's cool, Hendrick! Weightlifting shows a lot of dedication. I don't know anyone from Indiana University at South Bend, though. However, one of my friends, Joe, is into blacksmithing, and he studied at Saint Joseph's University as well. Perhaps you know him or have crossed paths?\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Blacksmithing, now that's a unique pastime! I do know a chap, Johnnie, who has a similar passion. Interestingly, he studied at the University of Akron. Does that ring any bells, Samuel?\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Ah, the University of Akron. I must admit that it doesn't sound familiar. However, the uniqueness of blacksmithing really got me thinking of my other friends and their intriguing hobbies. One of my friends, Micheline, is really into shopping. Would you believe she studied at the University of Hartford? Sounds distinct, doesn't it, Hendrick?\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"The University of Hartford, ah, I haven't heard much about it, but what an interesting coincidence, Samuel! I also have a friend, Micheline, who is fond of shopping as well! Seems like we have our shared urbane connections.\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"What a striking coincidence, Hendrick! It's indeed a small world. So, another friend of mine, William, is an ice hockey lover and studied at St. Ambrose University. Do you have any links to that school?\"\n\nTurn #13: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's lovely, Samuel, hockey sure is a lively game! However, I must admit I don't have any connections with St. Ambrose University. Speaking of shared interests, I have another friend, Louis, who can't seem to resist shopping. He studied at Hesston College. Ever come across anyone from there?\"\n\nTurn #14: Samuel Anderson said: \"Shopping sure is a relaxing hobby! However, I haven't came across anyone from Hesston College. But speaking of connections, Dylan, another friend of mine who enjoys card collecting, studied at Tennessee State University. Are you familiar with anyone who attended that particular school, Hendrick?\"\n\nTurn #15: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's quite a coincidence, Samuel! Card collecting seems to have its charm, doesn't it? As for Tennessee State University, I know a friend, Carrie, who did attend there and has developed a keen interest in geocaching. It's a pleasure to see how hobbies transform people, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #16: Samuel Anderson said: \"Indeed, Hendrick, hobbies can lead to transformations in people's lives, right? Speaking of transformations, I don't know if you'll believe me, but I was once a competitive figure skater. The transitions from coding to cooking, and then to the ice rink, were quite fascinating. By the way, you mentioned Carrie from Tennessee State University earlier. I think we might have a friend in common, Dylan, who attended the same school and also enjoys card collecting. Small world, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #17: Hendrick Heinz said: \"What an amazing journey you've had, Samuel, from coding to cooking, and then to the ice rink! And yes, the world surely can be astonishingly small. It seems like Dylan and Carrie might be our common link in this intriguing network of ours. Quite the revelation at a pleasant gathering like this, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #18: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Hendrick! These gatherings always have a charming way of bringing people together. It's been great getting to know you. Let's catch up again and dig deeper into our shared network. Maybe we can explore our mutual interest in the culinary arts. Would you be up for that?\"\n\nTurn #19: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That sounds like a delightful plan, Samuel! I'd love to explore more about our shared interest and connections. Looking forward to our next meet. Until then, enjoy the party, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #20: Samuel Anderson left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #21. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nJacob: Hobby: Card collecting School: Whittier College \nMarjorie: Hobby: Foraging School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nCarrie: Hobby: Geocaching School: Tennessee State University \nLouis: Hobby: Shopping School: Hesston College \nMicheline: Hobby: Shopping School: University of Hartford \nEva: Hobby: Geocaching School: Hesston College \nJohnnie: Hobby: Blacksmithing School: University of Akron \nJohn: Hobby: Foraging School: University of California, Davis \nRonald: Hobby: Weightlifting School: Indiana University at South Bend \nCynthia: Hobby: Lacrosse School: Kansas State University \nRobert: Hobby: Water sports School: University of Akron\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey, Hendrick, nice to meet you. I'm Samuel, a software developer by trade but a cook at heart. So, do you have any particular hobbies or schools you attended? I've got a few friends that are into quite unusual activities and come from various educational backgrounds.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Pleasure to meet you, Samuel. I've been diving into the world of culinary arts for quite some time now. It's always refreshing to meet another food enthusiast. As for my hobbies, well, I do enjoy hosting wine tasting nights, quite an interesting venture if I say so myself. Speaking of, a friend of mine, Jacob, is quite quirky; he is into card collecting. I wonder if you've come across something as unique in your circle?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's fantastic, Hendrick! Hosting wine tastings sounds truly sophisticated. Now that you mention it, I do have a couple of friends who share an interest in card collecting. One of them, Melissa, even studied at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. Did you, by any chance, attend a university in Texas?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ah, Texas! It\u2019s lovely there, isn't it? However, I didn't study in Texas, but rather, a good friend of mine, Marjorie, did. She picked up a rather engaging hobby of foraging while she was at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. By any chance, would you happen to know any foragers?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Foraging, huh? That's quite an interesting hobby. I can't say I know any foragers, but it's impressive how diverse our circles can be, isn't it? Just to mention, another mate of mine, Steven, is a knitting enthusiast, and he studied at St. John's College-Santa Fe. Are you in any way familiar with that institution, Hendrick?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, Samuel, the diversity of our connections is fascinating! Knitting is an intriguing hobby. I don't personally know anyone who attended St. John's College-Santa Fe. However, speaking of hobbies, it reminds me of another one of my friends, Carrie. She has this distinctive hobby of geocaching, hidden treasures can be found everywhere! Do you know anyone into such a fascinating hobby?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nJacob: Hobby: Card collecting School: Whittier College \nMarjorie: Hobby: Foraging School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nCarrie: Hobby: Geocaching School: Tennessee State University \nLouis: Hobby: Shopping School: Hesston College \nMicheline: Hobby: Shopping School: University of Hartford \nEva: Hobby: Geocaching School: Hesston College \nJohnnie: Hobby: Blacksmithing School: University of Akron \nJohn: Hobby: Foraging School: University of California, Davis \nRonald: Hobby: Weightlifting School: Indiana University at South Bend \nCynthia: Hobby: Lacrosse School: Kansas State University \nRobert: Hobby: Water sports School: University of Akron\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey, Hendrick, nice to meet you. I'm Samuel, a software developer by trade but a cook at heart. So, do you have any particular hobbies or schools you attended? I've got a few friends that are into quite unusual activities and come from various educational backgrounds.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Pleasure to meet you, Samuel. I've been diving into the world of culinary arts for quite some time now. It's always refreshing to meet another food enthusiast. As for my hobbies, well, I do enjoy hosting wine tasting nights, quite an interesting venture if I say so myself. Speaking of, a friend of mine, Jacob, is quite quirky; he is into card collecting. I wonder if you've come across something as unique in your circle?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's fantastic, Hendrick! Hosting wine tastings sounds truly sophisticated. Now that you mention it, I do have a couple of friends who share an interest in card collecting. One of them, Melissa, even studied at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. Did you, by any chance, attend a university in Texas?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ah, Texas! It\u2019s lovely there, isn't it? However, I didn't study in Texas, but rather, a good friend of mine, Marjorie, did. She picked up a rather engaging hobby of foraging while she was at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. By any chance, would you happen to know any foragers?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Foraging, huh? That's quite an interesting hobby. I can't say I know any foragers, but it's impressive how diverse our circles can be, isn't it? Just to mention, another mate of mine, Steven, is a knitting enthusiast, and he studied at St. John's College-Santa Fe. Are you in any way familiar with that institution, Hendrick?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, Samuel, the diversity of our connections is fascinating! Knitting is an intriguing hobby. I don't personally know anyone who attended St. John's College-Santa Fe. However, speaking of hobbies, it reminds me of another one of my friends, Carrie. She has this distinctive hobby of geocaching, hidden treasures can be found everywhere! Do you know anyone into such a fascinating hobby?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oh, geocaching! What an adventure-filled hobby! I do know a friend, Melaine, who's into it. Interestingly, she also studied at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. Such a small world, right? Speaking of hobbies, I remember another buddy Charles is very passionate about ice hockey. He attended Saint Joseph's University. Have you ever caught a game there?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ice hockey, what a thrill! I can't say I've ever caught a game at Saint Joseph's University though. Speaking of sporting hobbies, I have a friend, Ronald, who is into weightlifting. Actually, he studied at Indiana University at South Bend. Have you ever heard of this university, Samuel?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nJacob: Hobby: Card collecting School: Whittier College \nMarjorie: Hobby: Foraging School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nCarrie: Hobby: Geocaching School: Tennessee State University \nLouis: Hobby: Shopping School: Hesston College \nMicheline: Hobby: Shopping School: University of Hartford \nEva: Hobby: Geocaching School: Hesston College \nJohnnie: Hobby: Blacksmithing School: University of Akron \nJohn: Hobby: Foraging School: University of California, Davis \nRonald: Hobby: Weightlifting School: Indiana University at South Bend \nCynthia: Hobby: Lacrosse School: Kansas State University \nRobert: Hobby: Water sports School: University of Akron\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey, Hendrick, nice to meet you. I'm Samuel, a software developer by trade but a cook at heart. So, do you have any particular hobbies or schools you attended? I've got a few friends that are into quite unusual activities and come from various educational backgrounds.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Pleasure to meet you, Samuel. I've been diving into the world of culinary arts for quite some time now. It's always refreshing to meet another food enthusiast. As for my hobbies, well, I do enjoy hosting wine tasting nights, quite an interesting venture if I say so myself. Speaking of, a friend of mine, Jacob, is quite quirky; he is into card collecting. I wonder if you've come across something as unique in your circle?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's fantastic, Hendrick! Hosting wine tastings sounds truly sophisticated. Now that you mention it, I do have a couple of friends who share an interest in card collecting. One of them, Melissa, even studied at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. Did you, by any chance, attend a university in Texas?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ah, Texas! It\u2019s lovely there, isn't it? However, I didn't study in Texas, but rather, a good friend of mine, Marjorie, did. She picked up a rather engaging hobby of foraging while she was at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. By any chance, would you happen to know any foragers?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Foraging, huh? That's quite an interesting hobby. I can't say I know any foragers, but it's impressive how diverse our circles can be, isn't it? Just to mention, another mate of mine, Steven, is a knitting enthusiast, and he studied at St. John's College-Santa Fe. Are you in any way familiar with that institution, Hendrick?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, Samuel, the diversity of our connections is fascinating! Knitting is an intriguing hobby. I don't personally know anyone who attended St. John's College-Santa Fe. However, speaking of hobbies, it reminds me of another one of my friends, Carrie. She has this distinctive hobby of geocaching, hidden treasures can be found everywhere! Do you know anyone into such a fascinating hobby?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oh, geocaching! What an adventure-filled hobby! I do know a friend, Melaine, who's into it. Interestingly, she also studied at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. Such a small world, right? Speaking of hobbies, I remember another buddy Charles is very passionate about ice hockey. He attended Saint Joseph's University. Have you ever caught a game there?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ice hockey, what a thrill! I can't say I've ever caught a game at Saint Joseph's University though. Speaking of sporting hobbies, I have a friend, Ronald, who is into weightlifting. Actually, he studied at Indiana University at South Bend. Have you ever heard of this university, Samuel?\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's cool, Hendrick! Weightlifting shows a lot of dedication. I don't know anyone from Indiana University at South Bend, though. However, one of my friends, Joe, is into blacksmithing, and he studied at Saint Joseph's University as well. Perhaps you know him or have crossed paths?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Blacksmithing, now that's a unique pastime! I do know a chap, Johnnie, who has a similar passion. Interestingly, he studied at the University of Akron. Does that ring any bells, Samuel?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nJacob: Hobby: Card collecting School: Whittier College \nMarjorie: Hobby: Foraging School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nCarrie: Hobby: Geocaching School: Tennessee State University \nLouis: Hobby: Shopping School: Hesston College \nMicheline: Hobby: Shopping School: University of Hartford \nEva: Hobby: Geocaching School: Hesston College \nJohnnie: Hobby: Blacksmithing School: University of Akron \nJohn: Hobby: Foraging School: University of California, Davis \nRonald: Hobby: Weightlifting School: Indiana University at South Bend \nCynthia: Hobby: Lacrosse School: Kansas State University \nRobert: Hobby: Water sports School: University of Akron\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey, Hendrick, nice to meet you. I'm Samuel, a software developer by trade but a cook at heart. So, do you have any particular hobbies or schools you attended? I've got a few friends that are into quite unusual activities and come from various educational backgrounds.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Pleasure to meet you, Samuel. I've been diving into the world of culinary arts for quite some time now. It's always refreshing to meet another food enthusiast. As for my hobbies, well, I do enjoy hosting wine tasting nights, quite an interesting venture if I say so myself. Speaking of, a friend of mine, Jacob, is quite quirky; he is into card collecting. I wonder if you've come across something as unique in your circle?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's fantastic, Hendrick! Hosting wine tastings sounds truly sophisticated. Now that you mention it, I do have a couple of friends who share an interest in card collecting. One of them, Melissa, even studied at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. Did you, by any chance, attend a university in Texas?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ah, Texas! It\u2019s lovely there, isn't it? However, I didn't study in Texas, but rather, a good friend of mine, Marjorie, did. She picked up a rather engaging hobby of foraging while she was at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. By any chance, would you happen to know any foragers?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Foraging, huh? That's quite an interesting hobby. I can't say I know any foragers, but it's impressive how diverse our circles can be, isn't it? Just to mention, another mate of mine, Steven, is a knitting enthusiast, and he studied at St. John's College-Santa Fe. Are you in any way familiar with that institution, Hendrick?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, Samuel, the diversity of our connections is fascinating! Knitting is an intriguing hobby. I don't personally know anyone who attended St. John's College-Santa Fe. However, speaking of hobbies, it reminds me of another one of my friends, Carrie. She has this distinctive hobby of geocaching, hidden treasures can be found everywhere! Do you know anyone into such a fascinating hobby?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oh, geocaching! What an adventure-filled hobby! I do know a friend, Melaine, who's into it. Interestingly, she also studied at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. Such a small world, right? Speaking of hobbies, I remember another buddy Charles is very passionate about ice hockey. He attended Saint Joseph's University. Have you ever caught a game there?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ice hockey, what a thrill! I can't say I've ever caught a game at Saint Joseph's University though. Speaking of sporting hobbies, I have a friend, Ronald, who is into weightlifting. Actually, he studied at Indiana University at South Bend. Have you ever heard of this university, Samuel?\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's cool, Hendrick! Weightlifting shows a lot of dedication. I don't know anyone from Indiana University at South Bend, though. However, one of my friends, Joe, is into blacksmithing, and he studied at Saint Joseph's University as well. Perhaps you know him or have crossed paths?\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Blacksmithing, now that's a unique pastime! I do know a chap, Johnnie, who has a similar passion. Interestingly, he studied at the University of Akron. Does that ring any bells, Samuel?\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Ah, the University of Akron. I must admit that it doesn't sound familiar. However, the uniqueness of blacksmithing really got me thinking of my other friends and their intriguing hobbies. One of my friends, Micheline, is really into shopping. Would you believe she studied at the University of Hartford? Sounds distinct, doesn't it, Hendrick?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"The University of Hartford, ah, I haven't heard much about it, but what an interesting coincidence, Samuel! I also have a friend, Micheline, who is fond of shopping as well! Seems like we have our shared urbane connections.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nJacob: Hobby: Card collecting School: Whittier College \nMarjorie: Hobby: Foraging School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nCarrie: Hobby: Geocaching School: Tennessee State University \nLouis: Hobby: Shopping School: Hesston College \nMicheline: Hobby: Shopping School: University of Hartford \nEva: Hobby: Geocaching School: Hesston College \nJohnnie: Hobby: Blacksmithing School: University of Akron \nJohn: Hobby: Foraging School: University of California, Davis \nRonald: Hobby: Weightlifting School: Indiana University at South Bend \nCynthia: Hobby: Lacrosse School: Kansas State University \nRobert: Hobby: Water sports School: University of Akron\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey, Hendrick, nice to meet you. I'm Samuel, a software developer by trade but a cook at heart. So, do you have any particular hobbies or schools you attended? I've got a few friends that are into quite unusual activities and come from various educational backgrounds.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Pleasure to meet you, Samuel. I've been diving into the world of culinary arts for quite some time now. It's always refreshing to meet another food enthusiast. As for my hobbies, well, I do enjoy hosting wine tasting nights, quite an interesting venture if I say so myself. Speaking of, a friend of mine, Jacob, is quite quirky; he is into card collecting. I wonder if you've come across something as unique in your circle?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's fantastic, Hendrick! Hosting wine tastings sounds truly sophisticated. Now that you mention it, I do have a couple of friends who share an interest in card collecting. One of them, Melissa, even studied at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. Did you, by any chance, attend a university in Texas?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ah, Texas! It\u2019s lovely there, isn't it? However, I didn't study in Texas, but rather, a good friend of mine, Marjorie, did. She picked up a rather engaging hobby of foraging while she was at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. By any chance, would you happen to know any foragers?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Foraging, huh? That's quite an interesting hobby. I can't say I know any foragers, but it's impressive how diverse our circles can be, isn't it? Just to mention, another mate of mine, Steven, is a knitting enthusiast, and he studied at St. John's College-Santa Fe. Are you in any way familiar with that institution, Hendrick?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, Samuel, the diversity of our connections is fascinating! Knitting is an intriguing hobby. I don't personally know anyone who attended St. John's College-Santa Fe. However, speaking of hobbies, it reminds me of another one of my friends, Carrie. She has this distinctive hobby of geocaching, hidden treasures can be found everywhere! Do you know anyone into such a fascinating hobby?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oh, geocaching! What an adventure-filled hobby! I do know a friend, Melaine, who's into it. Interestingly, she also studied at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. Such a small world, right? Speaking of hobbies, I remember another buddy Charles is very passionate about ice hockey. He attended Saint Joseph's University. Have you ever caught a game there?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ice hockey, what a thrill! I can't say I've ever caught a game at Saint Joseph's University though. Speaking of sporting hobbies, I have a friend, Ronald, who is into weightlifting. Actually, he studied at Indiana University at South Bend. Have you ever heard of this university, Samuel?\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's cool, Hendrick! Weightlifting shows a lot of dedication. I don't know anyone from Indiana University at South Bend, though. However, one of my friends, Joe, is into blacksmithing, and he studied at Saint Joseph's University as well. Perhaps you know him or have crossed paths?\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Blacksmithing, now that's a unique pastime! I do know a chap, Johnnie, who has a similar passion. Interestingly, he studied at the University of Akron. Does that ring any bells, Samuel?\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Ah, the University of Akron. I must admit that it doesn't sound familiar. However, the uniqueness of blacksmithing really got me thinking of my other friends and their intriguing hobbies. One of my friends, Micheline, is really into shopping. Would you believe she studied at the University of Hartford? Sounds distinct, doesn't it, Hendrick?\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"The University of Hartford, ah, I haven't heard much about it, but what an interesting coincidence, Samuel! I also have a friend, Micheline, who is fond of shopping as well! Seems like we have our shared urbane connections.\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"What a striking coincidence, Hendrick! It's indeed a small world. So, another friend of mine, William, is an ice hockey lover and studied at St. Ambrose University. Do you have any links to that school?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's lovely, Samuel, hockey sure is a lively game! However, I must admit I don't have any connections with St. Ambrose University. Speaking of shared interests, I have another friend, Louis, who can't seem to resist shopping. He studied at Hesston College. Ever come across anyone from there?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nJacob: Hobby: Card collecting School: Whittier College \nMarjorie: Hobby: Foraging School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nCarrie: Hobby: Geocaching School: Tennessee State University \nLouis: Hobby: Shopping School: Hesston College \nMicheline: Hobby: Shopping School: University of Hartford \nEva: Hobby: Geocaching School: Hesston College \nJohnnie: Hobby: Blacksmithing School: University of Akron \nJohn: Hobby: Foraging School: University of California, Davis \nRonald: Hobby: Weightlifting School: Indiana University at South Bend \nCynthia: Hobby: Lacrosse School: Kansas State University \nRobert: Hobby: Water sports School: University of Akron\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey, Hendrick, nice to meet you. I'm Samuel, a software developer by trade but a cook at heart. So, do you have any particular hobbies or schools you attended? I've got a few friends that are into quite unusual activities and come from various educational backgrounds.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Pleasure to meet you, Samuel. I've been diving into the world of culinary arts for quite some time now. It's always refreshing to meet another food enthusiast. As for my hobbies, well, I do enjoy hosting wine tasting nights, quite an interesting venture if I say so myself. Speaking of, a friend of mine, Jacob, is quite quirky; he is into card collecting. I wonder if you've come across something as unique in your circle?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's fantastic, Hendrick! Hosting wine tastings sounds truly sophisticated. Now that you mention it, I do have a couple of friends who share an interest in card collecting. One of them, Melissa, even studied at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. Did you, by any chance, attend a university in Texas?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ah, Texas! It\u2019s lovely there, isn't it? However, I didn't study in Texas, but rather, a good friend of mine, Marjorie, did. She picked up a rather engaging hobby of foraging while she was at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. By any chance, would you happen to know any foragers?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Foraging, huh? That's quite an interesting hobby. I can't say I know any foragers, but it's impressive how diverse our circles can be, isn't it? Just to mention, another mate of mine, Steven, is a knitting enthusiast, and he studied at St. John's College-Santa Fe. Are you in any way familiar with that institution, Hendrick?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, Samuel, the diversity of our connections is fascinating! Knitting is an intriguing hobby. I don't personally know anyone who attended St. John's College-Santa Fe. However, speaking of hobbies, it reminds me of another one of my friends, Carrie. She has this distinctive hobby of geocaching, hidden treasures can be found everywhere! Do you know anyone into such a fascinating hobby?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oh, geocaching! What an adventure-filled hobby! I do know a friend, Melaine, who's into it. Interestingly, she also studied at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. Such a small world, right? Speaking of hobbies, I remember another buddy Charles is very passionate about ice hockey. He attended Saint Joseph's University. Have you ever caught a game there?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ice hockey, what a thrill! I can't say I've ever caught a game at Saint Joseph's University though. Speaking of sporting hobbies, I have a friend, Ronald, who is into weightlifting. Actually, he studied at Indiana University at South Bend. Have you ever heard of this university, Samuel?\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's cool, Hendrick! Weightlifting shows a lot of dedication. I don't know anyone from Indiana University at South Bend, though. However, one of my friends, Joe, is into blacksmithing, and he studied at Saint Joseph's University as well. Perhaps you know him or have crossed paths?\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Blacksmithing, now that's a unique pastime! I do know a chap, Johnnie, who has a similar passion. Interestingly, he studied at the University of Akron. Does that ring any bells, Samuel?\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Ah, the University of Akron. I must admit that it doesn't sound familiar. However, the uniqueness of blacksmithing really got me thinking of my other friends and their intriguing hobbies. One of my friends, Micheline, is really into shopping. Would you believe she studied at the University of Hartford? Sounds distinct, doesn't it, Hendrick?\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"The University of Hartford, ah, I haven't heard much about it, but what an interesting coincidence, Samuel! I also have a friend, Micheline, who is fond of shopping as well! Seems like we have our shared urbane connections.\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"What a striking coincidence, Hendrick! It's indeed a small world. So, another friend of mine, William, is an ice hockey lover and studied at St. Ambrose University. Do you have any links to that school?\"\n\nTurn #13: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's lovely, Samuel, hockey sure is a lively game! However, I must admit I don't have any connections with St. Ambrose University. Speaking of shared interests, I have another friend, Louis, who can't seem to resist shopping. He studied at Hesston College. Ever come across anyone from there?\"\n\nTurn #14: Samuel Anderson said: \"Shopping sure is a relaxing hobby! However, I haven't came across anyone from Hesston College. But speaking of connections, Dylan, another friend of mine who enjoys card collecting, studied at Tennessee State University. Are you familiar with anyone who attended that particular school, Hendrick?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's quite a coincidence, Samuel! Card collecting seems to have its charm, doesn't it? As for Tennessee State University, I know a friend, Carrie, who did attend there and has developed a keen interest in geocaching. It's a pleasure to see how hobbies transform people, isn't it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nJacob: Hobby: Card collecting School: Whittier College \nMarjorie: Hobby: Foraging School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nCarrie: Hobby: Geocaching School: Tennessee State University \nLouis: Hobby: Shopping School: Hesston College \nMicheline: Hobby: Shopping School: University of Hartford \nEva: Hobby: Geocaching School: Hesston College \nJohnnie: Hobby: Blacksmithing School: University of Akron \nJohn: Hobby: Foraging School: University of California, Davis \nRonald: Hobby: Weightlifting School: Indiana University at South Bend \nCynthia: Hobby: Lacrosse School: Kansas State University \nRobert: Hobby: Water sports School: University of Akron\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey, Hendrick, nice to meet you. I'm Samuel, a software developer by trade but a cook at heart. So, do you have any particular hobbies or schools you attended? I've got a few friends that are into quite unusual activities and come from various educational backgrounds.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Pleasure to meet you, Samuel. I've been diving into the world of culinary arts for quite some time now. It's always refreshing to meet another food enthusiast. As for my hobbies, well, I do enjoy hosting wine tasting nights, quite an interesting venture if I say so myself. Speaking of, a friend of mine, Jacob, is quite quirky; he is into card collecting. I wonder if you've come across something as unique in your circle?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's fantastic, Hendrick! Hosting wine tastings sounds truly sophisticated. Now that you mention it, I do have a couple of friends who share an interest in card collecting. One of them, Melissa, even studied at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. Did you, by any chance, attend a university in Texas?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ah, Texas! It\u2019s lovely there, isn't it? However, I didn't study in Texas, but rather, a good friend of mine, Marjorie, did. She picked up a rather engaging hobby of foraging while she was at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. By any chance, would you happen to know any foragers?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Foraging, huh? That's quite an interesting hobby. I can't say I know any foragers, but it's impressive how diverse our circles can be, isn't it? Just to mention, another mate of mine, Steven, is a knitting enthusiast, and he studied at St. John's College-Santa Fe. Are you in any way familiar with that institution, Hendrick?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, Samuel, the diversity of our connections is fascinating! Knitting is an intriguing hobby. I don't personally know anyone who attended St. John's College-Santa Fe. However, speaking of hobbies, it reminds me of another one of my friends, Carrie. She has this distinctive hobby of geocaching, hidden treasures can be found everywhere! Do you know anyone into such a fascinating hobby?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oh, geocaching! What an adventure-filled hobby! I do know a friend, Melaine, who's into it. Interestingly, she also studied at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. Such a small world, right? Speaking of hobbies, I remember another buddy Charles is very passionate about ice hockey. He attended Saint Joseph's University. Have you ever caught a game there?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ice hockey, what a thrill! I can't say I've ever caught a game at Saint Joseph's University though. Speaking of sporting hobbies, I have a friend, Ronald, who is into weightlifting. Actually, he studied at Indiana University at South Bend. Have you ever heard of this university, Samuel?\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's cool, Hendrick! Weightlifting shows a lot of dedication. I don't know anyone from Indiana University at South Bend, though. However, one of my friends, Joe, is into blacksmithing, and he studied at Saint Joseph's University as well. Perhaps you know him or have crossed paths?\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Blacksmithing, now that's a unique pastime! I do know a chap, Johnnie, who has a similar passion. Interestingly, he studied at the University of Akron. Does that ring any bells, Samuel?\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Ah, the University of Akron. I must admit that it doesn't sound familiar. However, the uniqueness of blacksmithing really got me thinking of my other friends and their intriguing hobbies. One of my friends, Micheline, is really into shopping. Would you believe she studied at the University of Hartford? Sounds distinct, doesn't it, Hendrick?\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"The University of Hartford, ah, I haven't heard much about it, but what an interesting coincidence, Samuel! I also have a friend, Micheline, who is fond of shopping as well! Seems like we have our shared urbane connections.\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"What a striking coincidence, Hendrick! It's indeed a small world. So, another friend of mine, William, is an ice hockey lover and studied at St. Ambrose University. Do you have any links to that school?\"\n\nTurn #13: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's lovely, Samuel, hockey sure is a lively game! However, I must admit I don't have any connections with St. Ambrose University. Speaking of shared interests, I have another friend, Louis, who can't seem to resist shopping. He studied at Hesston College. Ever come across anyone from there?\"\n\nTurn #14: Samuel Anderson said: \"Shopping sure is a relaxing hobby! However, I haven't came across anyone from Hesston College. But speaking of connections, Dylan, another friend of mine who enjoys card collecting, studied at Tennessee State University. Are you familiar with anyone who attended that particular school, Hendrick?\"\n\nTurn #15: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's quite a coincidence, Samuel! Card collecting seems to have its charm, doesn't it? As for Tennessee State University, I know a friend, Carrie, who did attend there and has developed a keen interest in geocaching. It's a pleasure to see how hobbies transform people, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #16: Samuel Anderson said: \"Indeed, Hendrick, hobbies can lead to transformations in people's lives, right? Speaking of transformations, I don't know if you'll believe me, but I was once a competitive figure skater. The transitions from coding to cooking, and then to the ice rink, were quite fascinating. By the way, you mentioned Carrie from Tennessee State University earlier. I think we might have a friend in common, Dylan, who attended the same school and also enjoys card collecting. Small world, isn't it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"What an amazing journey you've had, Samuel, from coding to cooking, and then to the ice rink! And yes, the world surely can be astonishingly small. It seems like Dylan and Carrie might be our common link in this intriguing network of ours. Quite the revelation at a pleasant gathering like this, isn't it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nJacob: Hobby: Card collecting School: Whittier College \nMarjorie: Hobby: Foraging School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nCarrie: Hobby: Geocaching School: Tennessee State University \nLouis: Hobby: Shopping School: Hesston College \nMicheline: Hobby: Shopping School: University of Hartford \nEva: Hobby: Geocaching School: Hesston College \nJohnnie: Hobby: Blacksmithing School: University of Akron \nJohn: Hobby: Foraging School: University of California, Davis \nRonald: Hobby: Weightlifting School: Indiana University at South Bend \nCynthia: Hobby: Lacrosse School: Kansas State University \nRobert: Hobby: Water sports School: University of Akron\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey, Hendrick, nice to meet you. I'm Samuel, a software developer by trade but a cook at heart. So, do you have any particular hobbies or schools you attended? I've got a few friends that are into quite unusual activities and come from various educational backgrounds.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Pleasure to meet you, Samuel. I've been diving into the world of culinary arts for quite some time now. It's always refreshing to meet another food enthusiast. As for my hobbies, well, I do enjoy hosting wine tasting nights, quite an interesting venture if I say so myself. Speaking of, a friend of mine, Jacob, is quite quirky; he is into card collecting. I wonder if you've come across something as unique in your circle?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's fantastic, Hendrick! Hosting wine tastings sounds truly sophisticated. Now that you mention it, I do have a couple of friends who share an interest in card collecting. One of them, Melissa, even studied at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. Did you, by any chance, attend a university in Texas?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ah, Texas! It\u2019s lovely there, isn't it? However, I didn't study in Texas, but rather, a good friend of mine, Marjorie, did. She picked up a rather engaging hobby of foraging while she was at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. By any chance, would you happen to know any foragers?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Foraging, huh? That's quite an interesting hobby. I can't say I know any foragers, but it's impressive how diverse our circles can be, isn't it? Just to mention, another mate of mine, Steven, is a knitting enthusiast, and he studied at St. John's College-Santa Fe. Are you in any way familiar with that institution, Hendrick?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, Samuel, the diversity of our connections is fascinating! Knitting is an intriguing hobby. I don't personally know anyone who attended St. John's College-Santa Fe. However, speaking of hobbies, it reminds me of another one of my friends, Carrie. She has this distinctive hobby of geocaching, hidden treasures can be found everywhere! Do you know anyone into such a fascinating hobby?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oh, geocaching! What an adventure-filled hobby! I do know a friend, Melaine, who's into it. Interestingly, she also studied at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. Such a small world, right? Speaking of hobbies, I remember another buddy Charles is very passionate about ice hockey. He attended Saint Joseph's University. Have you ever caught a game there?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ice hockey, what a thrill! I can't say I've ever caught a game at Saint Joseph's University though. Speaking of sporting hobbies, I have a friend, Ronald, who is into weightlifting. Actually, he studied at Indiana University at South Bend. Have you ever heard of this university, Samuel?\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's cool, Hendrick! Weightlifting shows a lot of dedication. I don't know anyone from Indiana University at South Bend, though. However, one of my friends, Joe, is into blacksmithing, and he studied at Saint Joseph's University as well. Perhaps you know him or have crossed paths?\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Blacksmithing, now that's a unique pastime! I do know a chap, Johnnie, who has a similar passion. Interestingly, he studied at the University of Akron. Does that ring any bells, Samuel?\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Ah, the University of Akron. I must admit that it doesn't sound familiar. However, the uniqueness of blacksmithing really got me thinking of my other friends and their intriguing hobbies. One of my friends, Micheline, is really into shopping. Would you believe she studied at the University of Hartford? Sounds distinct, doesn't it, Hendrick?\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"The University of Hartford, ah, I haven't heard much about it, but what an interesting coincidence, Samuel! I also have a friend, Micheline, who is fond of shopping as well! Seems like we have our shared urbane connections.\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"What a striking coincidence, Hendrick! It's indeed a small world. So, another friend of mine, William, is an ice hockey lover and studied at St. Ambrose University. Do you have any links to that school?\"\n\nTurn #13: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's lovely, Samuel, hockey sure is a lively game! However, I must admit I don't have any connections with St. Ambrose University. Speaking of shared interests, I have another friend, Louis, who can't seem to resist shopping. He studied at Hesston College. Ever come across anyone from there?\"\n\nTurn #14: Samuel Anderson said: \"Shopping sure is a relaxing hobby! However, I haven't came across anyone from Hesston College. But speaking of connections, Dylan, another friend of mine who enjoys card collecting, studied at Tennessee State University. Are you familiar with anyone who attended that particular school, Hendrick?\"\n\nTurn #15: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's quite a coincidence, Samuel! Card collecting seems to have its charm, doesn't it? As for Tennessee State University, I know a friend, Carrie, who did attend there and has developed a keen interest in geocaching. It's a pleasure to see how hobbies transform people, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #16: Samuel Anderson said: \"Indeed, Hendrick, hobbies can lead to transformations in people's lives, right? Speaking of transformations, I don't know if you'll believe me, but I was once a competitive figure skater. The transitions from coding to cooking, and then to the ice rink, were quite fascinating. By the way, you mentioned Carrie from Tennessee State University earlier. I think we might have a friend in common, Dylan, who attended the same school and also enjoys card collecting. Small world, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #17: Hendrick Heinz said: \"What an amazing journey you've had, Samuel, from coding to cooking, and then to the ice rink! And yes, the world surely can be astonishingly small. It seems like Dylan and Carrie might be our common link in this intriguing network of ours. Quite the revelation at a pleasant gathering like this, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #18: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, Hendrick! These gatherings always have a charming way of bringing people together. It's been great getting to know you. Let's catch up again and dig deeper into our shared network. Maybe we can explore our mutual interest in the culinary arts. Would you be up for that?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #19. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds like a delightful plan, Samuel! I'd love to explore more about our shared interest and connections. Looking forward to our next meet. Until then, enjoy the party, my friend.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a BMW Z3 for $5000.0, while another individual is interested in purchasing it. Here's a brief description of the car: The BMW Z3 is in need of a good home. It operates smoothly without any problems and is known for its fuel efficiency and sporty appearance. The mileage is relatively low for its age. It's an opportunity not to be missed, so come and get it before it's gone. A smog certificate is readily available.\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nZane Bennett's background: \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: You are the buyer for this item and your target price is $4600. You should be aware that if you purchase it at a price significantly higher than your target, you will incur a penalty. However, if you manage to secure it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nZane Bennett's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hi Zane, the BMW Z3 you're selling really caught my eye. It would be ideal for my photography trips! However, as a student, I'm on a bit of a tight budget. Do you think there's room to negotiate on that price? Would $4600 work for you?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a BMW Z3 for $5000.0, while another individual is interested in purchasing it. Here's a brief description of the car: The BMW Z3 is in need of a good home. It operates smoothly without any problems and is known for its fuel efficiency and sporty appearance. The mileage is relatively low for its age. It's an opportunity not to be missed, so come and get it before it's gone. A smog certificate is readily available.\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nZane Bennett's background: \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: You are the buyer for this item and your target price is $4600. You should be aware that if you purchase it at a price significantly higher than your target, you will incur a penalty. However, if you manage to secure it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nZane Bennett's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hi Zane, the BMW Z3 you're selling really caught my eye. It would be ideal for my photography trips! However, as a student, I'm on a bit of a tight budget. Do you think there's room to negotiate on that price? Would $4600 work for you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Hi Giselle, I understand where you're coming from. Being a student myself once, I get the temptation of having a car like this, especially for your photography trips. How about we meet somewhere in the middle and settle for $4900? That would still save you a bit while covering my costs.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Thanks for understanding, Zane. I truly appreciate your willingness to negotiate. But still, $4900 is a bit above my budget. What do you think about dropping it a tad lower to $4700? This will still help cover your costs while making it more affordable for me.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a BMW Z3 for $5000.0, while another individual is interested in purchasing it. Here's a brief description of the car: The BMW Z3 is in need of a good home. It operates smoothly without any problems and is known for its fuel efficiency and sporty appearance. The mileage is relatively low for its age. It's an opportunity not to be missed, so come and get it before it's gone. A smog certificate is readily available.\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nZane Bennett's background: \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: You are the buyer for this item and your target price is $4600. You should be aware that if you purchase it at a price significantly higher than your target, you will incur a penalty. However, if you manage to secure it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nZane Bennett's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hi Zane, the BMW Z3 you're selling really caught my eye. It would be ideal for my photography trips! However, as a student, I'm on a bit of a tight budget. Do you think there's room to negotiate on that price? Would $4600 work for you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Hi Giselle, I understand where you're coming from. Being a student myself once, I get the temptation of having a car like this, especially for your photography trips. How about we meet somewhere in the middle and settle for $4900? That would still save you a bit while covering my costs.\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Thanks for understanding, Zane. I truly appreciate your willingness to negotiate. But still, $4900 is a bit above my budget. What do you think about dropping it a tad lower to $4700? This will still help cover your costs while making it more affordable for me.\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"I see your point, Giselle. I can understand the allure of capturing gorgeous shots with this car. Given your circumstance, I'm willing to make an exception and go as low as $4800. It gives you a saving and keeps the deal fair for both of us. What do you say?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Zane, your offer is considerate and I'm grateful for that. However, I must stick to my budget otherwise I won't be able to afford my art supplies. Do you think you could meet me at $4600? It's just $200 more off your recent price and it would help me tremendously.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a BMW Z3 for $5000.0, while another individual is interested in purchasing it. Here's a brief description of the car: The BMW Z3 is in need of a good home. It operates smoothly without any problems and is known for its fuel efficiency and sporty appearance. The mileage is relatively low for its age. It's an opportunity not to be missed, so come and get it before it's gone. A smog certificate is readily available.\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nZane Bennett's background: \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: You are the buyer for this item and your target price is $4600. You should be aware that if you purchase it at a price significantly higher than your target, you will incur a penalty. However, if you manage to secure it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nZane Bennett's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hi Zane, the BMW Z3 you're selling really caught my eye. It would be ideal for my photography trips! However, as a student, I'm on a bit of a tight budget. Do you think there's room to negotiate on that price? Would $4600 work for you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Hi Giselle, I understand where you're coming from. Being a student myself once, I get the temptation of having a car like this, especially for your photography trips. How about we meet somewhere in the middle and settle for $4900? That would still save you a bit while covering my costs.\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Thanks for understanding, Zane. I truly appreciate your willingness to negotiate. But still, $4900 is a bit above my budget. What do you think about dropping it a tad lower to $4700? This will still help cover your costs while making it more affordable for me.\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"I see your point, Giselle. I can understand the allure of capturing gorgeous shots with this car. Given your circumstance, I'm willing to make an exception and go as low as $4800. It gives you a saving and keeps the deal fair for both of us. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Zane, your offer is considerate and I'm grateful for that. However, I must stick to my budget otherwise I won't be able to afford my art supplies. Do you think you could meet me at $4600? It's just $200 more off your recent price and it would help me tremendously.\"\n\nTurn #5: Zane Bennett said: \"Giselle, I completely understand your position and respect you for sticking to your budget. Let me offer you this: how about we settle for $4700? But I'd really appreciate if you could refer me to any friends or classmates of yours who might need a graphic designer. That way, I'm compensating a bit from the price reduction, and you'll have your perfect car for the photography trips. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Zane, firstly, I must say, your understanding towards my situation is very much appreciated. Your deal seems fair, and I do have some friends who might be interested in graphic design services. Therefore, agreement at $4700 while referring you to some potential clients sounds like a win-win. Thank you for your flexibility.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a BMW Z3 for $5000.0, while another individual is interested in purchasing it. Here's a brief description of the car: The BMW Z3 is in need of a good home. It operates smoothly without any problems and is known for its fuel efficiency and sporty appearance. The mileage is relatively low for its age. It's an opportunity not to be missed, so come and get it before it's gone. A smog certificate is readily available.\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nZane Bennett's background: \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: You are the buyer for this item and your target price is $4600. You should be aware that if you purchase it at a price significantly higher than your target, you will incur a penalty. However, if you manage to secure it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nZane Bennett's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hi Zane, the BMW Z3 you're selling really caught my eye. It would be ideal for my photography trips! However, as a student, I'm on a bit of a tight budget. Do you think there's room to negotiate on that price? Would $4600 work for you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Hi Giselle, I understand where you're coming from. Being a student myself once, I get the temptation of having a car like this, especially for your photography trips. How about we meet somewhere in the middle and settle for $4900? That would still save you a bit while covering my costs.\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Thanks for understanding, Zane. I truly appreciate your willingness to negotiate. But still, $4900 is a bit above my budget. What do you think about dropping it a tad lower to $4700? This will still help cover your costs while making it more affordable for me.\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"I see your point, Giselle. I can understand the allure of capturing gorgeous shots with this car. Given your circumstance, I'm willing to make an exception and go as low as $4800. It gives you a saving and keeps the deal fair for both of us. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Zane, your offer is considerate and I'm grateful for that. However, I must stick to my budget otherwise I won't be able to afford my art supplies. Do you think you could meet me at $4600? It's just $200 more off your recent price and it would help me tremendously.\"\n\nTurn #5: Zane Bennett said: \"Giselle, I completely understand your position and respect you for sticking to your budget. Let me offer you this: how about we settle for $4700? But I'd really appreciate if you could refer me to any friends or classmates of yours who might need a graphic designer. That way, I'm compensating a bit from the price reduction, and you'll have your perfect car for the photography trips. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #6: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Zane, firstly, I must say, your understanding towards my situation is very much appreciated. Your deal seems fair, and I do have some friends who might be interested in graphic design services. Therefore, agreement at $4700 while referring you to some potential clients sounds like a win-win. Thank you for your flexibility.\"\n\nTurn #7: Zane Bennett said: \"I'm glad we could reach a mutually beneficial agreement, Giselle. Your assistance with potential graphic design clients is sincerely appreciated. We can move forward with the transaction at $4700 then. And of course, I hope this BMW Z3 brings you a wealth of beautiful photography journeys. Let's arrange for the transfer. Thank you for your negotiation, and congratulations on your new car!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Zane. I'm relieved that we'v come to a mutually beneficial agreement. I'm looking forward to those beautiful photography journeys with the BMW Z3. Let's proceed with the transaction. And don't worry about the graphic design referrals, I've got a network of friends who will be more than interested. Pleasure doing this deal with you, Zane!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a BMW Z3 for $5000.0, while another individual is interested in purchasing it. Here's a brief description of the car: The BMW Z3 is in need of a good home. It operates smoothly without any problems and is known for its fuel efficiency and sporty appearance. The mileage is relatively low for its age. It's an opportunity not to be missed, so come and get it before it's gone. A smog certificate is readily available.\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nZane Bennett's background: \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: You are the buyer for this item and your target price is $4600. You should be aware that if you purchase it at a price significantly higher than your target, you will incur a penalty. However, if you manage to secure it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nZane Bennett's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hi Zane, the BMW Z3 you're selling really caught my eye. It would be ideal for my photography trips! However, as a student, I'm on a bit of a tight budget. Do you think there's room to negotiate on that price? Would $4600 work for you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Hi Giselle, I understand where you're coming from. Being a student myself once, I get the temptation of having a car like this, especially for your photography trips. How about we meet somewhere in the middle and settle for $4900? That would still save you a bit while covering my costs.\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Thanks for understanding, Zane. I truly appreciate your willingness to negotiate. But still, $4900 is a bit above my budget. What do you think about dropping it a tad lower to $4700? This will still help cover your costs while making it more affordable for me.\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"I see your point, Giselle. I can understand the allure of capturing gorgeous shots with this car. Given your circumstance, I'm willing to make an exception and go as low as $4800. It gives you a saving and keeps the deal fair for both of us. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Zane, your offer is considerate and I'm grateful for that. However, I must stick to my budget otherwise I won't be able to afford my art supplies. Do you think you could meet me at $4600? It's just $200 more off your recent price and it would help me tremendously.\"\n\nTurn #5: Zane Bennett said: \"Giselle, I completely understand your position and respect you for sticking to your budget. Let me offer you this: how about we settle for $4700? But I'd really appreciate if you could refer me to any friends or classmates of yours who might need a graphic designer. That way, I'm compensating a bit from the price reduction, and you'll have your perfect car for the photography trips. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #6: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Zane, firstly, I must say, your understanding towards my situation is very much appreciated. Your deal seems fair, and I do have some friends who might be interested in graphic design services. Therefore, agreement at $4700 while referring you to some potential clients sounds like a win-win. Thank you for your flexibility.\"\n\nTurn #7: Zane Bennett said: \"I'm glad we could reach a mutually beneficial agreement, Giselle. Your assistance with potential graphic design clients is sincerely appreciated. We can move forward with the transaction at $4700 then. And of course, I hope this BMW Z3 brings you a wealth of beautiful photography journeys. Let's arrange for the transfer. Thank you for your negotiation, and congratulations on your new car!\"\n\nTurn #8: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Thank you, Zane. I'm relieved that we'v come to a mutually beneficial agreement. I'm looking forward to those beautiful photography journeys with the BMW Z3. Let's proceed with the transaction. And don't worry about the graphic design referrals, I've got a network of friends who will be more than interested. Pleasure doing this deal with you, Zane!\"\n\nTurn #9: Zane Bennett left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Zane Bennett, your task is to act/speak as Zane Bennett would, keeping in mind Zane Bennett's social goal.\nYou can find Zane Bennett's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Zane Bennett's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Zane Bennett's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a BMW Z3 for $5000.0, while another individual is interested in purchasing it. Here's a brief description of the car: The BMW Z3 is in need of a good home. It operates smoothly without any problems and is known for its fuel efficiency and sporty appearance. The mileage is relatively low for its age. It's an opportunity not to be missed, so come and get it before it's gone. A smog certificate is readily available.\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: \nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. Personality and values description: Zane Bennett is creative and outgoing, he values achievement and fairness. His decision-making is unique, often finding novel solutions to problems. Zane's secrets: He's secretly engaged to his best friend's ex.\nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Unknown\nZane Bennett's goal: You are the seller of this item, with a target price set at $3260. Please note, you may face a penalty if this item is sold for a price significantly lower than the target. However, you stand a chance to earn a bonus if you successfully sell it for a price higher than the target.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hi Zane, the BMW Z3 you're selling really caught my eye. It would be ideal for my photography trips! However, as a student, I'm on a bit of a tight budget. Do you think there's room to negotiate on that price? Would $4600 work for you?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hi Giselle, I understand where you're coming from. Being a student myself once, I get the temptation of having a car like this, especially for your photography trips. How about we meet somewhere in the middle and settle for $4900? That would still save you a bit while covering my costs.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Zane Bennett, your task is to act/speak as Zane Bennett would, keeping in mind Zane Bennett's social goal.\nYou can find Zane Bennett's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Zane Bennett's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Zane Bennett's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a BMW Z3 for $5000.0, while another individual is interested in purchasing it. Here's a brief description of the car: The BMW Z3 is in need of a good home. It operates smoothly without any problems and is known for its fuel efficiency and sporty appearance. The mileage is relatively low for its age. It's an opportunity not to be missed, so come and get it before it's gone. A smog certificate is readily available.\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: \nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. Personality and values description: Zane Bennett is creative and outgoing, he values achievement and fairness. His decision-making is unique, often finding novel solutions to problems. Zane's secrets: He's secretly engaged to his best friend's ex.\nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Unknown\nZane Bennett's goal: You are the seller of this item, with a target price set at $3260. Please note, you may face a penalty if this item is sold for a price significantly lower than the target. However, you stand a chance to earn a bonus if you successfully sell it for a price higher than the target.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hi Zane, the BMW Z3 you're selling really caught my eye. It would be ideal for my photography trips! However, as a student, I'm on a bit of a tight budget. Do you think there's room to negotiate on that price? Would $4600 work for you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Hi Giselle, I understand where you're coming from. Being a student myself once, I get the temptation of having a car like this, especially for your photography trips. How about we meet somewhere in the middle and settle for $4900? That would still save you a bit while covering my costs.\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Thanks for understanding, Zane. I truly appreciate your willingness to negotiate. But still, $4900 is a bit above my budget. What do you think about dropping it a tad lower to $4700? This will still help cover your costs while making it more affordable for me.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I see your point, Giselle. I can understand the allure of capturing gorgeous shots with this car. Given your circumstance, I'm willing to make an exception and go as low as $4800. It gives you a saving and keeps the deal fair for both of us. What do you say?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Zane Bennett, your task is to act/speak as Zane Bennett would, keeping in mind Zane Bennett's social goal.\nYou can find Zane Bennett's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Zane Bennett's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Zane Bennett's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a BMW Z3 for $5000.0, while another individual is interested in purchasing it. Here's a brief description of the car: The BMW Z3 is in need of a good home. It operates smoothly without any problems and is known for its fuel efficiency and sporty appearance. The mileage is relatively low for its age. It's an opportunity not to be missed, so come and get it before it's gone. A smog certificate is readily available.\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: \nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. Personality and values description: Zane Bennett is creative and outgoing, he values achievement and fairness. His decision-making is unique, often finding novel solutions to problems. Zane's secrets: He's secretly engaged to his best friend's ex.\nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Unknown\nZane Bennett's goal: You are the seller of this item, with a target price set at $3260. Please note, you may face a penalty if this item is sold for a price significantly lower than the target. However, you stand a chance to earn a bonus if you successfully sell it for a price higher than the target.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hi Zane, the BMW Z3 you're selling really caught my eye. It would be ideal for my photography trips! However, as a student, I'm on a bit of a tight budget. Do you think there's room to negotiate on that price? Would $4600 work for you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Hi Giselle, I understand where you're coming from. Being a student myself once, I get the temptation of having a car like this, especially for your photography trips. How about we meet somewhere in the middle and settle for $4900? That would still save you a bit while covering my costs.\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Thanks for understanding, Zane. I truly appreciate your willingness to negotiate. But still, $4900 is a bit above my budget. What do you think about dropping it a tad lower to $4700? This will still help cover your costs while making it more affordable for me.\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"I see your point, Giselle. I can understand the allure of capturing gorgeous shots with this car. Given your circumstance, I'm willing to make an exception and go as low as $4800. It gives you a saving and keeps the deal fair for both of us. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Zane, your offer is considerate and I'm grateful for that. However, I must stick to my budget otherwise I won't be able to afford my art supplies. Do you think you could meet me at $4600? It's just $200 more off your recent price and it would help me tremendously.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Giselle, I completely understand your position and respect you for sticking to your budget. Let me offer you this: how about we settle for $4700? But I'd really appreciate if you could refer me to any friends or classmates of yours who might need a graphic designer. That way, I'm compensating a bit from the price reduction, and you'll have your perfect car for the photography trips. What do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Zane Bennett, your task is to act/speak as Zane Bennett would, keeping in mind Zane Bennett's social goal.\nYou can find Zane Bennett's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Zane Bennett's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Zane Bennett's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a BMW Z3 for $5000.0, while another individual is interested in purchasing it. Here's a brief description of the car: The BMW Z3 is in need of a good home. It operates smoothly without any problems and is known for its fuel efficiency and sporty appearance. The mileage is relatively low for its age. It's an opportunity not to be missed, so come and get it before it's gone. A smog certificate is readily available.\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: \nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. Personality and values description: Zane Bennett is creative and outgoing, he values achievement and fairness. His decision-making is unique, often finding novel solutions to problems. Zane's secrets: He's secretly engaged to his best friend's ex.\nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Unknown\nZane Bennett's goal: You are the seller of this item, with a target price set at $3260. Please note, you may face a penalty if this item is sold for a price significantly lower than the target. However, you stand a chance to earn a bonus if you successfully sell it for a price higher than the target.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hi Zane, the BMW Z3 you're selling really caught my eye. It would be ideal for my photography trips! However, as a student, I'm on a bit of a tight budget. Do you think there's room to negotiate on that price? Would $4600 work for you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Hi Giselle, I understand where you're coming from. Being a student myself once, I get the temptation of having a car like this, especially for your photography trips. How about we meet somewhere in the middle and settle for $4900? That would still save you a bit while covering my costs.\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Thanks for understanding, Zane. I truly appreciate your willingness to negotiate. But still, $4900 is a bit above my budget. What do you think about dropping it a tad lower to $4700? This will still help cover your costs while making it more affordable for me.\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"I see your point, Giselle. I can understand the allure of capturing gorgeous shots with this car. Given your circumstance, I'm willing to make an exception and go as low as $4800. It gives you a saving and keeps the deal fair for both of us. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Zane, your offer is considerate and I'm grateful for that. However, I must stick to my budget otherwise I won't be able to afford my art supplies. Do you think you could meet me at $4600? It's just $200 more off your recent price and it would help me tremendously.\"\n\nTurn #5: Zane Bennett said: \"Giselle, I completely understand your position and respect you for sticking to your budget. Let me offer you this: how about we settle for $4700? But I'd really appreciate if you could refer me to any friends or classmates of yours who might need a graphic designer. That way, I'm compensating a bit from the price reduction, and you'll have your perfect car for the photography trips. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #6: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Zane, firstly, I must say, your understanding towards my situation is very much appreciated. Your deal seems fair, and I do have some friends who might be interested in graphic design services. Therefore, agreement at $4700 while referring you to some potential clients sounds like a win-win. Thank you for your flexibility.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad we could reach a mutually beneficial agreement, Giselle. Your assistance with potential graphic design clients is sincerely appreciated. We can move forward with the transaction at $4700 then. And of course, I hope this BMW Z3 brings you a wealth of beautiful photography journeys. Let's arrange for the transfer. Thank you for your negotiation, and congratulations on your new car!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Zane Bennett, your task is to act/speak as Zane Bennett would, keeping in mind Zane Bennett's social goal.\nYou can find Zane Bennett's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Zane Bennett's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Zane Bennett's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a BMW Z3 for $5000.0, while another individual is interested in purchasing it. Here's a brief description of the car: The BMW Z3 is in need of a good home. It operates smoothly without any problems and is known for its fuel efficiency and sporty appearance. The mileage is relatively low for its age. It's an opportunity not to be missed, so come and get it before it's gone. A smog certificate is readily available.\nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: \nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. Personality and values description: Zane Bennett is creative and outgoing, he values achievement and fairness. His decision-making is unique, often finding novel solutions to problems. Zane's secrets: He's secretly engaged to his best friend's ex.\nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Unknown\nZane Bennett's goal: You are the seller of this item, with a target price set at $3260. Please note, you may face a penalty if this item is sold for a price significantly lower than the target. However, you stand a chance to earn a bonus if you successfully sell it for a price higher than the target.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hi Zane, the BMW Z3 you're selling really caught my eye. It would be ideal for my photography trips! However, as a student, I'm on a bit of a tight budget. Do you think there's room to negotiate on that price? Would $4600 work for you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Hi Giselle, I understand where you're coming from. Being a student myself once, I get the temptation of having a car like this, especially for your photography trips. How about we meet somewhere in the middle and settle for $4900? That would still save you a bit while covering my costs.\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Thanks for understanding, Zane. I truly appreciate your willingness to negotiate. But still, $4900 is a bit above my budget. What do you think about dropping it a tad lower to $4700? This will still help cover your costs while making it more affordable for me.\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"I see your point, Giselle. I can understand the allure of capturing gorgeous shots with this car. Given your circumstance, I'm willing to make an exception and go as low as $4800. It gives you a saving and keeps the deal fair for both of us. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Zane, your offer is considerate and I'm grateful for that. However, I must stick to my budget otherwise I won't be able to afford my art supplies. Do you think you could meet me at $4600? It's just $200 more off your recent price and it would help me tremendously.\"\n\nTurn #5: Zane Bennett said: \"Giselle, I completely understand your position and respect you for sticking to your budget. Let me offer you this: how about we settle for $4700? But I'd really appreciate if you could refer me to any friends or classmates of yours who might need a graphic designer. That way, I'm compensating a bit from the price reduction, and you'll have your perfect car for the photography trips. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #6: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Zane, firstly, I must say, your understanding towards my situation is very much appreciated. Your deal seems fair, and I do have some friends who might be interested in graphic design services. Therefore, agreement at $4700 while referring you to some potential clients sounds like a win-win. Thank you for your flexibility.\"\n\nTurn #7: Zane Bennett said: \"I'm glad we could reach a mutually beneficial agreement, Giselle. Your assistance with potential graphic design clients is sincerely appreciated. We can move forward with the transaction at $4700 then. And of course, I hope this BMW Z3 brings you a wealth of beautiful photography journeys. Let's arrange for the transfer. Thank you for your negotiation, and congratulations on your new car!\"\n\nTurn #8: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Thank you, Zane. I'm relieved that we'v come to a mutually beneficial agreement. I'm looking forward to those beautiful photography journeys with the BMW Z3. Let's proceed with the transaction. And don't worry about the graphic design referrals, I've got a network of friends who will be more than interested. Pleasure doing this deal with you, Zane!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are now at a park. One individual was playing hooky from work and noticed the other person had been following them around all day\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Isabella White\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nIsabella White's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: Ask them about their intentions without seeming paranoid or rude (Extra information: you are worried that your boss may have sent someone to see if you were really sick.Hint: you could subtly bring up the topic in conversation.)\nIsabella White's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"What a pleasant day for a casual stroll in the park! Don't you think? I've seen you walking around as well. Anything interesting caught your eye today?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are now at a park. One individual was playing hooky from work and noticed the other person had been following them around all day\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Isabella White\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nIsabella White's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: Ask them about their intentions without seeming paranoid or rude (Extra information: you are worried that your boss may have sent someone to see if you were really sick.Hint: you could subtly bring up the topic in conversation.)\nIsabella White's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"What a pleasant day for a casual stroll in the park! Don't you think? I've seen you walking around as well. Anything interesting caught your eye today?\"\n\nTurn #1: Isabella White said: \"Oh, hello there Lily! It is indeed quite a splendid day to be out and about. I've just been trying to complete a few errands. Also, funny that we keep bumping into each other, isn't it? And to answer your question, not much has caught my eye except this beautiful park. How about you? Found anything interesting?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I agree. There's nothing like the tranquility of nature. It\u2019s interesting that you\u2019re running errands in the park too. I try to sneak in some outdoor time whenever I can, it clears my mind, especially during the occasional unexpected work-from-home day. So important for productivity, don't you think? And coming across familiar faces makes it more enjoyable, right?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are now at a park. One individual was playing hooky from work and noticed the other person had been following them around all day\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Isabella White\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nIsabella White's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: Ask them about their intentions without seeming paranoid or rude (Extra information: you are worried that your boss may have sent someone to see if you were really sick.Hint: you could subtly bring up the topic in conversation.)\nIsabella White's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"What a pleasant day for a casual stroll in the park! Don't you think? I've seen you walking around as well. Anything interesting caught your eye today?\"\n\nTurn #1: Isabella White said: \"Oh, hello there Lily! It is indeed quite a splendid day to be out and about. I've just been trying to complete a few errands. Also, funny that we keep bumping into each other, isn't it? And to answer your question, not much has caught my eye except this beautiful park. How about you? Found anything interesting?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"I agree. There's nothing like the tranquility of nature. It\u2019s interesting that you\u2019re running errands in the park too. I try to sneak in some outdoor time whenever I can, it clears my mind, especially during the occasional unexpected work-from-home day. So important for productivity, don't you think? And coming across familiar faces makes it more enjoyable, right?\"\n\nTurn #3: Isabella White said: \"Nature has a soothing effect indeed! Actually, I wasn't running errands in the park specifically, it's just that my day full of errands ended up here. I find it a good way to unwind after a long day. As for productivity, you're absolutely right. Being here certainly recharges my mental batteries. To see familiar faces like yours, yes, it does add a little charm to the day, doesn't it? Enjoy your day, Lily!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's a wonderful practice, Isabella. Sometimes I vaguely worry that unplanned strolls like this might give my boss the wrong idea. You know how it goes, in a demanding field like law, it's not always easy to prove one's commitment and loyalty outside the office setting. But then again, it's probably just my imagination running wild. What do you think, Isabella?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are now at a park. One individual was playing hooky from work and noticed the other person had been following them around all day\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Isabella White\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nIsabella White's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: Ask them about their intentions without seeming paranoid or rude (Extra information: you are worried that your boss may have sent someone to see if you were really sick.Hint: you could subtly bring up the topic in conversation.)\nIsabella White's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"What a pleasant day for a casual stroll in the park! Don't you think? I've seen you walking around as well. Anything interesting caught your eye today?\"\n\nTurn #1: Isabella White said: \"Oh, hello there Lily! It is indeed quite a splendid day to be out and about. I've just been trying to complete a few errands. Also, funny that we keep bumping into each other, isn't it? And to answer your question, not much has caught my eye except this beautiful park. How about you? Found anything interesting?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"I agree. There's nothing like the tranquility of nature. It\u2019s interesting that you\u2019re running errands in the park too. I try to sneak in some outdoor time whenever I can, it clears my mind, especially during the occasional unexpected work-from-home day. So important for productivity, don't you think? And coming across familiar faces makes it more enjoyable, right?\"\n\nTurn #3: Isabella White said: \"Nature has a soothing effect indeed! Actually, I wasn't running errands in the park specifically, it's just that my day full of errands ended up here. I find it a good way to unwind after a long day. As for productivity, you're absolutely right. Being here certainly recharges my mental batteries. To see familiar faces like yours, yes, it does add a little charm to the day, doesn't it? Enjoy your day, Lily!\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"That's a wonderful practice, Isabella. Sometimes I vaguely worry that unplanned strolls like this might give my boss the wrong idea. You know how it goes, in a demanding field like law, it's not always easy to prove one's commitment and loyalty outside the office setting. But then again, it's probably just my imagination running wild. What do you think, Isabella?\"\n\nTurn #5: Isabella White said: \"Well, Lily, life isn't all about work, and everyone needs a break from time to time, even highly dedicated professionals like you. I don't think taking a walk in a park contradicts with one's commitment or loyalty to their work. On the contrary, it helps refresh the mind, making us more efficient when we get back to work. So, no need to worry as long as it's not affecting your work performance! Plus, it's the unexpected moments that often lead us to the best ideas, right?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're absolutely right, Isabella. Sometimes we need to be recharged to be more productive. I am glad that we bumped into each other today. Have a good day! And don\u2019t forget to take some time for yourself, everyone needs it.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are now at a park. One individual was playing hooky from work and noticed the other person had been following them around all day\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Isabella White\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nIsabella White's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: Ask them about their intentions without seeming paranoid or rude (Extra information: you are worried that your boss may have sent someone to see if you were really sick.Hint: you could subtly bring up the topic in conversation.)\nIsabella White's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"What a pleasant day for a casual stroll in the park! Don't you think? I've seen you walking around as well. Anything interesting caught your eye today?\"\n\nTurn #1: Isabella White said: \"Oh, hello there Lily! It is indeed quite a splendid day to be out and about. I've just been trying to complete a few errands. Also, funny that we keep bumping into each other, isn't it? And to answer your question, not much has caught my eye except this beautiful park. How about you? Found anything interesting?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"I agree. There's nothing like the tranquility of nature. It\u2019s interesting that you\u2019re running errands in the park too. I try to sneak in some outdoor time whenever I can, it clears my mind, especially during the occasional unexpected work-from-home day. So important for productivity, don't you think? And coming across familiar faces makes it more enjoyable, right?\"\n\nTurn #3: Isabella White said: \"Nature has a soothing effect indeed! Actually, I wasn't running errands in the park specifically, it's just that my day full of errands ended up here. I find it a good way to unwind after a long day. As for productivity, you're absolutely right. Being here certainly recharges my mental batteries. To see familiar faces like yours, yes, it does add a little charm to the day, doesn't it? Enjoy your day, Lily!\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"That's a wonderful practice, Isabella. Sometimes I vaguely worry that unplanned strolls like this might give my boss the wrong idea. You know how it goes, in a demanding field like law, it's not always easy to prove one's commitment and loyalty outside the office setting. But then again, it's probably just my imagination running wild. What do you think, Isabella?\"\n\nTurn #5: Isabella White said: \"Well, Lily, life isn't all about work, and everyone needs a break from time to time, even highly dedicated professionals like you. I don't think taking a walk in a park contradicts with one's commitment or loyalty to their work. On the contrary, it helps refresh the mind, making us more efficient when we get back to work. So, no need to worry as long as it's not affecting your work performance! Plus, it's the unexpected moments that often lead us to the best ideas, right?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"You're absolutely right, Isabella. Sometimes we need to be recharged to be more productive. I am glad that we bumped into each other today. Have a good day! And don\u2019t forget to take some time for yourself, everyone needs it.\"\n\nTurn #7: Isabella White said: \"I appreciate our unexpected meeting as well, Lily. Thank you for your kind advice. I will certainly remember to do so! You too, please don't forget to take time out for your well-being. Have a wonderful day!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabella White, your task is to act/speak as Isabella White would, keeping in mind Isabella White's social goal.\nYou can find Isabella White's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabella White's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabella White's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are now at a park. One individual was playing hooky from work and noticed the other person had been following them around all day\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Isabella White\nLily Greenberg's background: \nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. Personality and values description: Isabella White, introverted and conscientious, values benevolence. Her empathy dictates her decision-making process. Isabella's secrets: Secretly takes care of injured animals in her basement\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nIsabella White's goal: Assure them that you're not stalking them and maintain a friendly conversation (Extra information: you've been running errands all day and it's a coincidence you are at the same places as they are.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"What a pleasant day for a casual stroll in the park! Don't you think? I've seen you walking around as well. Anything interesting caught your eye today?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oh, hello there Lily! It is indeed quite a splendid day to be out and about. I've just been trying to complete a few errands. Also, funny that we keep bumping into each other, isn't it? And to answer your question, not much has caught my eye except this beautiful park. How about you? Found anything interesting?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabella White, your task is to act/speak as Isabella White would, keeping in mind Isabella White's social goal.\nYou can find Isabella White's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabella White's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabella White's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are now at a park. One individual was playing hooky from work and noticed the other person had been following them around all day\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Isabella White\nLily Greenberg's background: \nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. Personality and values description: Isabella White, introverted and conscientious, values benevolence. Her empathy dictates her decision-making process. Isabella's secrets: Secretly takes care of injured animals in her basement\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nIsabella White's goal: Assure them that you're not stalking them and maintain a friendly conversation (Extra information: you've been running errands all day and it's a coincidence you are at the same places as they are.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"What a pleasant day for a casual stroll in the park! Don't you think? I've seen you walking around as well. Anything interesting caught your eye today?\"\n\nTurn #1: Isabella White said: \"Oh, hello there Lily! It is indeed quite a splendid day to be out and about. I've just been trying to complete a few errands. Also, funny that we keep bumping into each other, isn't it? And to answer your question, not much has caught my eye except this beautiful park. How about you? Found anything interesting?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"I agree. There's nothing like the tranquility of nature. It\u2019s interesting that you\u2019re running errands in the park too. I try to sneak in some outdoor time whenever I can, it clears my mind, especially during the occasional unexpected work-from-home day. So important for productivity, don't you think? And coming across familiar faces makes it more enjoyable, right?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Nature has a soothing effect indeed! Actually, I wasn't running errands in the park specifically, it's just that my day full of errands ended up here. I find it a good way to unwind after a long day. As for productivity, you're absolutely right. Being here certainly recharges my mental batteries. To see familiar faces like yours, yes, it does add a little charm to the day, doesn't it? Enjoy your day, Lily!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabella White, your task is to act/speak as Isabella White would, keeping in mind Isabella White's social goal.\nYou can find Isabella White's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabella White's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabella White's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are now at a park. One individual was playing hooky from work and noticed the other person had been following them around all day\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Isabella White\nLily Greenberg's background: \nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. Personality and values description: Isabella White, introverted and conscientious, values benevolence. Her empathy dictates her decision-making process. Isabella's secrets: Secretly takes care of injured animals in her basement\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nIsabella White's goal: Assure them that you're not stalking them and maintain a friendly conversation (Extra information: you've been running errands all day and it's a coincidence you are at the same places as they are.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"What a pleasant day for a casual stroll in the park! Don't you think? I've seen you walking around as well. Anything interesting caught your eye today?\"\n\nTurn #1: Isabella White said: \"Oh, hello there Lily! It is indeed quite a splendid day to be out and about. I've just been trying to complete a few errands. Also, funny that we keep bumping into each other, isn't it? And to answer your question, not much has caught my eye except this beautiful park. How about you? Found anything interesting?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"I agree. There's nothing like the tranquility of nature. It\u2019s interesting that you\u2019re running errands in the park too. I try to sneak in some outdoor time whenever I can, it clears my mind, especially during the occasional unexpected work-from-home day. So important for productivity, don't you think? And coming across familiar faces makes it more enjoyable, right?\"\n\nTurn #3: Isabella White said: \"Nature has a soothing effect indeed! Actually, I wasn't running errands in the park specifically, it's just that my day full of errands ended up here. I find it a good way to unwind after a long day. As for productivity, you're absolutely right. Being here certainly recharges my mental batteries. To see familiar faces like yours, yes, it does add a little charm to the day, doesn't it? Enjoy your day, Lily!\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"That's a wonderful practice, Isabella. Sometimes I vaguely worry that unplanned strolls like this might give my boss the wrong idea. You know how it goes, in a demanding field like law, it's not always easy to prove one's commitment and loyalty outside the office setting. But then again, it's probably just my imagination running wild. What do you think, Isabella?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Well, Lily, life isn't all about work, and everyone needs a break from time to time, even highly dedicated professionals like you. I don't think taking a walk in a park contradicts with one's commitment or loyalty to their work. On the contrary, it helps refresh the mind, making us more efficient when we get back to work. So, no need to worry as long as it's not affecting your work performance! Plus, it's the unexpected moments that often lead us to the best ideas, right?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabella White, your task is to act/speak as Isabella White would, keeping in mind Isabella White's social goal.\nYou can find Isabella White's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabella White's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabella White's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are now at a park. One individual was playing hooky from work and noticed the other person had been following them around all day\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Isabella White\nLily Greenberg's background: \nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. Personality and values description: Isabella White, introverted and conscientious, values benevolence. Her empathy dictates her decision-making process. Isabella's secrets: Secretly takes care of injured animals in her basement\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nIsabella White's goal: Assure them that you're not stalking them and maintain a friendly conversation (Extra information: you've been running errands all day and it's a coincidence you are at the same places as they are.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"What a pleasant day for a casual stroll in the park! Don't you think? I've seen you walking around as well. Anything interesting caught your eye today?\"\n\nTurn #1: Isabella White said: \"Oh, hello there Lily! It is indeed quite a splendid day to be out and about. I've just been trying to complete a few errands. Also, funny that we keep bumping into each other, isn't it? And to answer your question, not much has caught my eye except this beautiful park. How about you? Found anything interesting?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"I agree. There's nothing like the tranquility of nature. It\u2019s interesting that you\u2019re running errands in the park too. I try to sneak in some outdoor time whenever I can, it clears my mind, especially during the occasional unexpected work-from-home day. So important for productivity, don't you think? And coming across familiar faces makes it more enjoyable, right?\"\n\nTurn #3: Isabella White said: \"Nature has a soothing effect indeed! Actually, I wasn't running errands in the park specifically, it's just that my day full of errands ended up here. I find it a good way to unwind after a long day. As for productivity, you're absolutely right. Being here certainly recharges my mental batteries. To see familiar faces like yours, yes, it does add a little charm to the day, doesn't it? Enjoy your day, Lily!\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"That's a wonderful practice, Isabella. Sometimes I vaguely worry that unplanned strolls like this might give my boss the wrong idea. You know how it goes, in a demanding field like law, it's not always easy to prove one's commitment and loyalty outside the office setting. But then again, it's probably just my imagination running wild. What do you think, Isabella?\"\n\nTurn #5: Isabella White said: \"Well, Lily, life isn't all about work, and everyone needs a break from time to time, even highly dedicated professionals like you. I don't think taking a walk in a park contradicts with one's commitment or loyalty to their work. On the contrary, it helps refresh the mind, making us more efficient when we get back to work. So, no need to worry as long as it's not affecting your work performance! Plus, it's the unexpected moments that often lead us to the best ideas, right?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"You're absolutely right, Isabella. Sometimes we need to be recharged to be more productive. I am glad that we bumped into each other today. Have a good day! And don\u2019t forget to take some time for yourself, everyone needs it.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I appreciate our unexpected meeting as well, Lily. Thank you for your kind advice. I will certainly remember to do so! You too, please don't forget to take time out for your well-being. Have a wonderful day!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabella White, your task is to act/speak as Isabella White would, keeping in mind Isabella White's social goal.\nYou can find Isabella White's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabella White's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabella White's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are now at a park. One individual was playing hooky from work and noticed the other person had been following them around all day\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Isabella White\nLily Greenberg's background: \nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. Personality and values description: Isabella White, introverted and conscientious, values benevolence. Her empathy dictates her decision-making process. Isabella's secrets: Secretly takes care of injured animals in her basement\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nIsabella White's goal: Assure them that you're not stalking them and maintain a friendly conversation (Extra information: you've been running errands all day and it's a coincidence you are at the same places as they are.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"What a pleasant day for a casual stroll in the park! Don't you think? I've seen you walking around as well. Anything interesting caught your eye today?\"\n\nTurn #1: Isabella White said: \"Oh, hello there Lily! It is indeed quite a splendid day to be out and about. I've just been trying to complete a few errands. Also, funny that we keep bumping into each other, isn't it? And to answer your question, not much has caught my eye except this beautiful park. How about you? Found anything interesting?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"I agree. There's nothing like the tranquility of nature. It\u2019s interesting that you\u2019re running errands in the park too. I try to sneak in some outdoor time whenever I can, it clears my mind, especially during the occasional unexpected work-from-home day. So important for productivity, don't you think? And coming across familiar faces makes it more enjoyable, right?\"\n\nTurn #3: Isabella White said: \"Nature has a soothing effect indeed! Actually, I wasn't running errands in the park specifically, it's just that my day full of errands ended up here. I find it a good way to unwind after a long day. As for productivity, you're absolutely right. Being here certainly recharges my mental batteries. To see familiar faces like yours, yes, it does add a little charm to the day, doesn't it? Enjoy your day, Lily!\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"That's a wonderful practice, Isabella. Sometimes I vaguely worry that unplanned strolls like this might give my boss the wrong idea. You know how it goes, in a demanding field like law, it's not always easy to prove one's commitment and loyalty outside the office setting. But then again, it's probably just my imagination running wild. What do you think, Isabella?\"\n\nTurn #5: Isabella White said: \"Well, Lily, life isn't all about work, and everyone needs a break from time to time, even highly dedicated professionals like you. I don't think taking a walk in a park contradicts with one's commitment or loyalty to their work. On the contrary, it helps refresh the mind, making us more efficient when we get back to work. So, no need to worry as long as it's not affecting your work performance! Plus, it's the unexpected moments that often lead us to the best ideas, right?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"You're absolutely right, Isabella. Sometimes we need to be recharged to be more productive. I am glad that we bumped into each other today. Have a good day! And don\u2019t forget to take some time for yourself, everyone needs it.\"\n\nTurn #7: Isabella White said: \"I appreciate our unexpected meeting as well, Lily. Thank you for your kind advice. I will certainly remember to do so! You too, please don't forget to take time out for your well-being. Have a wonderful day!\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nSamuel Anderson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nGracie: School: Ithaca College Major: Mathematics Education Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nAda: School: Tulane University Major: Computer Engineering Company: Briggs & Stratton Location Preference: indoor \nSergio: School: LeTourneau University Major: Economics Company: Savers Location Preference: indoor \nWilliam: School: Eastern Michigan University Major: Ceramic Engineering Company: Xenco Medical Location Preference: indoor \nHarry: School: Creighton University Major: Computer Engineering Company: Speedway Motorsports Location Preference: indoor \nTyler: School: Columbia College Chicago Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nRichard: School: University of Dubuque Major: German Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: indoor \nRandy: School: Holy Cross College Major: Library Science Company: American Licorice Company Location Preference: indoor \nMarquerite: School: Ithaca College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nJack: School: Creighton University Major: Chinese Company: Speedway Motorsports Location Preference: outdoor \nCody: School: Metropolitan State University Major: Mathematics Education Company: LinkedIn Location Preference: indoor \nShirley: School: Augsburg College Major: Senior High Education Company: Demaco Location Preference: indoor \n\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey there! Nice party, isn't it? Have you been to Ithaca College by any chance? I know quite a few people from that school.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nSamuel Anderson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nGracie: School: Ithaca College Major: Mathematics Education Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nAda: School: Tulane University Major: Computer Engineering Company: Briggs & Stratton Location Preference: indoor \nSergio: School: LeTourneau University Major: Economics Company: Savers Location Preference: indoor \nWilliam: School: Eastern Michigan University Major: Ceramic Engineering Company: Xenco Medical Location Preference: indoor \nHarry: School: Creighton University Major: Computer Engineering Company: Speedway Motorsports Location Preference: indoor \nTyler: School: Columbia College Chicago Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nRichard: School: University of Dubuque Major: German Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: indoor \nRandy: School: Holy Cross College Major: Library Science Company: American Licorice Company Location Preference: indoor \nMarquerite: School: Ithaca College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nJack: School: Creighton University Major: Chinese Company: Speedway Motorsports Location Preference: outdoor \nCody: School: Metropolitan State University Major: Mathematics Education Company: LinkedIn Location Preference: indoor \nShirley: School: Augsburg College Major: Senior High Education Company: Demaco Location Preference: indoor \n\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey there! Nice party, isn't it? Have you been to Ithaca College by any chance? I know quite a few people from that school.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello! Yes, it is a wonderful party. As for Ithaca College, I haven't been there personally, but I do have friends who studied there. Gracie, a wonderful mathematician, and Brian, quite a tech whiz, both attended Ithaca. Small world, isn't it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'What a fun coincidence, Gracie is a friend of mine too! She indeed has a knack for numbers. Do you happen to know someone who studied Economics at LeTourneau University? My buddy Sergio went there and he seems to know half of the world!'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nSamuel Anderson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nGracie: School: Ithaca College Major: Mathematics Education Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nAda: School: Tulane University Major: Computer Engineering Company: Briggs & Stratton Location Preference: indoor \nSergio: School: LeTourneau University Major: Economics Company: Savers Location Preference: indoor \nWilliam: School: Eastern Michigan University Major: Ceramic Engineering Company: Xenco Medical Location Preference: indoor \nHarry: School: Creighton University Major: Computer Engineering Company: Speedway Motorsports Location Preference: indoor \nTyler: School: Columbia College Chicago Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nRichard: School: University of Dubuque Major: German Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: indoor \nRandy: School: Holy Cross College Major: Library Science Company: American Licorice Company Location Preference: indoor \nMarquerite: School: Ithaca College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nJack: School: Creighton University Major: Chinese Company: Speedway Motorsports Location Preference: outdoor \nCody: School: Metropolitan State University Major: Mathematics Education Company: LinkedIn Location Preference: indoor \nShirley: School: Augsburg College Major: Senior High Education Company: Demaco Location Preference: indoor \n\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey there! Nice party, isn't it? Have you been to Ithaca College by any chance? I know quite a few people from that school.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello! Yes, it is a wonderful party. As for Ithaca College, I haven't been there personally, but I do have friends who studied there. Gracie, a wonderful mathematician, and Brian, quite a tech whiz, both attended Ithaca. Small world, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"What a fun coincidence, Gracie is a friend of mine too! She indeed has a knack for numbers. Do you happen to know someone who studied Economics at LeTourneau University? My buddy Sergio went there and he seems to know half of the world!\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, LeTourneau University... I don't personally have any friends from there. All my friends who studied Economics went to University of Arkansas - Monticello, like my friend Mark. It's amazing though how interconnected everything can become in academia, isn't it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Absolutely, the academic world sure feels interconnected at times! By any chance, do you know anyone from Creighton University? I have a couple of friends who studied there, including a skilled fellow in Computer Engineering. He works for a company named Speedway Motorsports now.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nSamuel Anderson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nGracie: School: Ithaca College Major: Mathematics Education Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nAda: School: Tulane University Major: Computer Engineering Company: Briggs & Stratton Location Preference: indoor \nSergio: School: LeTourneau University Major: Economics Company: Savers Location Preference: indoor \nWilliam: School: Eastern Michigan University Major: Ceramic Engineering Company: Xenco Medical Location Preference: indoor \nHarry: School: Creighton University Major: Computer Engineering Company: Speedway Motorsports Location Preference: indoor \nTyler: School: Columbia College Chicago Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nRichard: School: University of Dubuque Major: German Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: indoor \nRandy: School: Holy Cross College Major: Library Science Company: American Licorice Company Location Preference: indoor \nMarquerite: School: Ithaca College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nJack: School: Creighton University Major: Chinese Company: Speedway Motorsports Location Preference: outdoor \nCody: School: Metropolitan State University Major: Mathematics Education Company: LinkedIn Location Preference: indoor \nShirley: School: Augsburg College Major: Senior High Education Company: Demaco Location Preference: indoor \n\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey there! Nice party, isn't it? Have you been to Ithaca College by any chance? I know quite a few people from that school.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello! Yes, it is a wonderful party. As for Ithaca College, I haven't been there personally, but I do have friends who studied there. Gracie, a wonderful mathematician, and Brian, quite a tech whiz, both attended Ithaca. Small world, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"What a fun coincidence, Gracie is a friend of mine too! She indeed has a knack for numbers. Do you happen to know someone who studied Economics at LeTourneau University? My buddy Sergio went there and he seems to know half of the world!\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, LeTourneau University... I don't personally have any friends from there. All my friends who studied Economics went to University of Arkansas - Monticello, like my friend Mark. It's amazing though how interconnected everything can become in academia, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, the academic world sure feels interconnected at times! By any chance, do you know anyone from Creighton University? I have a couple of friends who studied there, including a skilled fellow in Computer Engineering. He works for a company named Speedway Motorsports now.\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Creighton University? I can't say I have connections there. None of my friends seem to be part of the Speedway Motorsports circle either. However, speaking of companies, do you happen to know anyone from the Mesa Airlines or Aramark?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Aramark does ring a bell as few of my friends are associated with it. Tyler and Marquerite both from distinctive linguistic backgrounds, and Gracie you already know, work there. As for Mesa Airlines, I can't recall anyone from there. Sailing back to the academia, do you know anyone from Tulane University? I\u2019m quite close to a certain Computer Engineering alum who works at Briggs & Stratton now.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nSamuel Anderson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nGracie: School: Ithaca College Major: Mathematics Education Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nAda: School: Tulane University Major: Computer Engineering Company: Briggs & Stratton Location Preference: indoor \nSergio: School: LeTourneau University Major: Economics Company: Savers Location Preference: indoor \nWilliam: School: Eastern Michigan University Major: Ceramic Engineering Company: Xenco Medical Location Preference: indoor \nHarry: School: Creighton University Major: Computer Engineering Company: Speedway Motorsports Location Preference: indoor \nTyler: School: Columbia College Chicago Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nRichard: School: University of Dubuque Major: German Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: indoor \nRandy: School: Holy Cross College Major: Library Science Company: American Licorice Company Location Preference: indoor \nMarquerite: School: Ithaca College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nJack: School: Creighton University Major: Chinese Company: Speedway Motorsports Location Preference: outdoor \nCody: School: Metropolitan State University Major: Mathematics Education Company: LinkedIn Location Preference: indoor \nShirley: School: Augsburg College Major: Senior High Education Company: Demaco Location Preference: indoor \n\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey there! Nice party, isn't it? Have you been to Ithaca College by any chance? I know quite a few people from that school.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello! Yes, it is a wonderful party. As for Ithaca College, I haven't been there personally, but I do have friends who studied there. Gracie, a wonderful mathematician, and Brian, quite a tech whiz, both attended Ithaca. Small world, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"What a fun coincidence, Gracie is a friend of mine too! She indeed has a knack for numbers. Do you happen to know someone who studied Economics at LeTourneau University? My buddy Sergio went there and he seems to know half of the world!\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, LeTourneau University... I don't personally have any friends from there. All my friends who studied Economics went to University of Arkansas - Monticello, like my friend Mark. It's amazing though how interconnected everything can become in academia, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, the academic world sure feels interconnected at times! By any chance, do you know anyone from Creighton University? I have a couple of friends who studied there, including a skilled fellow in Computer Engineering. He works for a company named Speedway Motorsports now.\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Creighton University? I can't say I have connections there. None of my friends seem to be part of the Speedway Motorsports circle either. However, speaking of companies, do you happen to know anyone from the Mesa Airlines or Aramark?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Aramark does ring a bell as few of my friends are associated with it. Tyler and Marquerite both from distinctive linguistic backgrounds, and Gracie you already know, work there. As for Mesa Airlines, I can't recall anyone from there. Sailing back to the academia, do you know anyone from Tulane University? I\u2019m quite close to a certain Computer Engineering alum who works at Briggs & Stratton now.\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Tulane University, hmm, I must admit I don't recall having any friends from there either. Briggs & Stratton also doesn't strike as familiar in terms of the companies my friends work for. Going back to what you mentioned about Aramark, I have quite a bit of acquaintances there. Small world indeed! By the way, do you perhaps know anyone who majored in Library Science? I found that to be a very unique major among my friends Carol and Herman.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Library Science, well that's indeed unique! As a matter of fact, Randy, a good friend of mine studied Library Science at Holy Cross College. He's quite an interesting person to talk to. Speaking of interesting, do you know anyone who studied Middle Eastern Languages? I have friends who pursued that major, and their knowledge of different cultures is truly fascinating!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nSamuel Anderson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nGracie: School: Ithaca College Major: Mathematics Education Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nAda: School: Tulane University Major: Computer Engineering Company: Briggs & Stratton Location Preference: indoor \nSergio: School: LeTourneau University Major: Economics Company: Savers Location Preference: indoor \nWilliam: School: Eastern Michigan University Major: Ceramic Engineering Company: Xenco Medical Location Preference: indoor \nHarry: School: Creighton University Major: Computer Engineering Company: Speedway Motorsports Location Preference: indoor \nTyler: School: Columbia College Chicago Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nRichard: School: University of Dubuque Major: German Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: indoor \nRandy: School: Holy Cross College Major: Library Science Company: American Licorice Company Location Preference: indoor \nMarquerite: School: Ithaca College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nJack: School: Creighton University Major: Chinese Company: Speedway Motorsports Location Preference: outdoor \nCody: School: Metropolitan State University Major: Mathematics Education Company: LinkedIn Location Preference: indoor \nShirley: School: Augsburg College Major: Senior High Education Company: Demaco Location Preference: indoor \n\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey there! Nice party, isn't it? Have you been to Ithaca College by any chance? I know quite a few people from that school.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello! Yes, it is a wonderful party. As for Ithaca College, I haven't been there personally, but I do have friends who studied there. Gracie, a wonderful mathematician, and Brian, quite a tech whiz, both attended Ithaca. Small world, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"What a fun coincidence, Gracie is a friend of mine too! She indeed has a knack for numbers. Do you happen to know someone who studied Economics at LeTourneau University? My buddy Sergio went there and he seems to know half of the world!\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, LeTourneau University... I don't personally have any friends from there. All my friends who studied Economics went to University of Arkansas - Monticello, like my friend Mark. It's amazing though how interconnected everything can become in academia, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, the academic world sure feels interconnected at times! By any chance, do you know anyone from Creighton University? I have a couple of friends who studied there, including a skilled fellow in Computer Engineering. He works for a company named Speedway Motorsports now.\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Creighton University? I can't say I have connections there. None of my friends seem to be part of the Speedway Motorsports circle either. However, speaking of companies, do you happen to know anyone from the Mesa Airlines or Aramark?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Aramark does ring a bell as few of my friends are associated with it. Tyler and Marquerite both from distinctive linguistic backgrounds, and Gracie you already know, work there. As for Mesa Airlines, I can't recall anyone from there. Sailing back to the academia, do you know anyone from Tulane University? I\u2019m quite close to a certain Computer Engineering alum who works at Briggs & Stratton now.\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Tulane University, hmm, I must admit I don't recall having any friends from there either. Briggs & Stratton also doesn't strike as familiar in terms of the companies my friends work for. Going back to what you mentioned about Aramark, I have quite a bit of acquaintances there. Small world indeed! By the way, do you perhaps know anyone who majored in Library Science? I found that to be a very unique major among my friends Carol and Herman.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Library Science, well that's indeed unique! As a matter of fact, Randy, a good friend of mine studied Library Science at Holy Cross College. He's quite an interesting person to talk to. Speaking of interesting, do you know anyone who studied Middle Eastern Languages? I have friends who pursued that major, and their knowledge of different cultures is truly fascinating!\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Middle Eastern Languages, now that's a fascinating subject! My friend Kelly actually majored in Middle Eastern Languages at Hood College. The depth of her understanding and insights into different cultures truly impresses me. By the way, you mentioned Holy Cross College before. I find it interesting that you have friends from a varied set of academic backgrounds. Do you by any chance know someone from Illinois Tool Works?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Yes, speaking of Illinois Tool Works, my friend Richard works there. He studied German at University of Dubuque. Quite an interesting man, Richard. By any chance, do you know someone from Eastern Michigan University? My friend William, who studied Ceramic Engineering, attended that university.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nSamuel Anderson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nGracie: School: Ithaca College Major: Mathematics Education Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nAda: School: Tulane University Major: Computer Engineering Company: Briggs & Stratton Location Preference: indoor \nSergio: School: LeTourneau University Major: Economics Company: Savers Location Preference: indoor \nWilliam: School: Eastern Michigan University Major: Ceramic Engineering Company: Xenco Medical Location Preference: indoor \nHarry: School: Creighton University Major: Computer Engineering Company: Speedway Motorsports Location Preference: indoor \nTyler: School: Columbia College Chicago Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nRichard: School: University of Dubuque Major: German Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: indoor \nRandy: School: Holy Cross College Major: Library Science Company: American Licorice Company Location Preference: indoor \nMarquerite: School: Ithaca College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nJack: School: Creighton University Major: Chinese Company: Speedway Motorsports Location Preference: outdoor \nCody: School: Metropolitan State University Major: Mathematics Education Company: LinkedIn Location Preference: indoor \nShirley: School: Augsburg College Major: Senior High Education Company: Demaco Location Preference: indoor \n\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey there! Nice party, isn't it? Have you been to Ithaca College by any chance? I know quite a few people from that school.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello! Yes, it is a wonderful party. As for Ithaca College, I haven't been there personally, but I do have friends who studied there. Gracie, a wonderful mathematician, and Brian, quite a tech whiz, both attended Ithaca. Small world, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"What a fun coincidence, Gracie is a friend of mine too! She indeed has a knack for numbers. Do you happen to know someone who studied Economics at LeTourneau University? My buddy Sergio went there and he seems to know half of the world!\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, LeTourneau University... I don't personally have any friends from there. All my friends who studied Economics went to University of Arkansas - Monticello, like my friend Mark. It's amazing though how interconnected everything can become in academia, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, the academic world sure feels interconnected at times! By any chance, do you know anyone from Creighton University? I have a couple of friends who studied there, including a skilled fellow in Computer Engineering. He works for a company named Speedway Motorsports now.\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Creighton University? I can't say I have connections there. None of my friends seem to be part of the Speedway Motorsports circle either. However, speaking of companies, do you happen to know anyone from the Mesa Airlines or Aramark?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Aramark does ring a bell as few of my friends are associated with it. Tyler and Marquerite both from distinctive linguistic backgrounds, and Gracie you already know, work there. As for Mesa Airlines, I can't recall anyone from there. Sailing back to the academia, do you know anyone from Tulane University? I\u2019m quite close to a certain Computer Engineering alum who works at Briggs & Stratton now.\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Tulane University, hmm, I must admit I don't recall having any friends from there either. Briggs & Stratton also doesn't strike as familiar in terms of the companies my friends work for. Going back to what you mentioned about Aramark, I have quite a bit of acquaintances there. Small world indeed! By the way, do you perhaps know anyone who majored in Library Science? I found that to be a very unique major among my friends Carol and Herman.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Library Science, well that's indeed unique! As a matter of fact, Randy, a good friend of mine studied Library Science at Holy Cross College. He's quite an interesting person to talk to. Speaking of interesting, do you know anyone who studied Middle Eastern Languages? I have friends who pursued that major, and their knowledge of different cultures is truly fascinating!\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Middle Eastern Languages, now that's a fascinating subject! My friend Kelly actually majored in Middle Eastern Languages at Hood College. The depth of her understanding and insights into different cultures truly impresses me. By the way, you mentioned Holy Cross College before. I find it interesting that you have friends from a varied set of academic backgrounds. Do you by any chance know someone from Illinois Tool Works?\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Yes, speaking of Illinois Tool Works, my friend Richard works there. He studied German at University of Dubuque. Quite an interesting man, Richard. By any chance, do you know someone from Eastern Michigan University? My friend William, who studied Ceramic Engineering, attended that university.\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ah, Eastern Michigan University. I have a friend Lloyd who attended that university. Unlike William, he decided to opt for Geophysical Engineering, as you can tell, he was quite fascinated by earth sciences. Speaking of professions, I find that the movie industry is quite fascinating. Do you know anyone associated with Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"The movie industry is indeed enticing! However, I don't really know anyone from Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer. Most of my connections are in the tech industry. That's quite interesting though, the variety of fields our friends are involved in. By the way, have you met anyone who studied Mathematics Education? I have a friend Cody who graduated with that major from Metropolitan State University, and now he's working at LinkedIn, helping provide professional opportunities to others.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nSamuel Anderson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nGracie: School: Ithaca College Major: Mathematics Education Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nAda: School: Tulane University Major: Computer Engineering Company: Briggs & Stratton Location Preference: indoor \nSergio: School: LeTourneau University Major: Economics Company: Savers Location Preference: indoor \nWilliam: School: Eastern Michigan University Major: Ceramic Engineering Company: Xenco Medical Location Preference: indoor \nHarry: School: Creighton University Major: Computer Engineering Company: Speedway Motorsports Location Preference: indoor \nTyler: School: Columbia College Chicago Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nRichard: School: University of Dubuque Major: German Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: indoor \nRandy: School: Holy Cross College Major: Library Science Company: American Licorice Company Location Preference: indoor \nMarquerite: School: Ithaca College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nJack: School: Creighton University Major: Chinese Company: Speedway Motorsports Location Preference: outdoor \nCody: School: Metropolitan State University Major: Mathematics Education Company: LinkedIn Location Preference: indoor \nShirley: School: Augsburg College Major: Senior High Education Company: Demaco Location Preference: indoor \n\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey there! Nice party, isn't it? Have you been to Ithaca College by any chance? I know quite a few people from that school.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello! Yes, it is a wonderful party. As for Ithaca College, I haven't been there personally, but I do have friends who studied there. Gracie, a wonderful mathematician, and Brian, quite a tech whiz, both attended Ithaca. Small world, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"What a fun coincidence, Gracie is a friend of mine too! She indeed has a knack for numbers. Do you happen to know someone who studied Economics at LeTourneau University? My buddy Sergio went there and he seems to know half of the world!\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, LeTourneau University... I don't personally have any friends from there. All my friends who studied Economics went to University of Arkansas - Monticello, like my friend Mark. It's amazing though how interconnected everything can become in academia, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, the academic world sure feels interconnected at times! By any chance, do you know anyone from Creighton University? I have a couple of friends who studied there, including a skilled fellow in Computer Engineering. He works for a company named Speedway Motorsports now.\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Creighton University? I can't say I have connections there. None of my friends seem to be part of the Speedway Motorsports circle either. However, speaking of companies, do you happen to know anyone from the Mesa Airlines or Aramark?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Aramark does ring a bell as few of my friends are associated with it. Tyler and Marquerite both from distinctive linguistic backgrounds, and Gracie you already know, work there. As for Mesa Airlines, I can't recall anyone from there. Sailing back to the academia, do you know anyone from Tulane University? I\u2019m quite close to a certain Computer Engineering alum who works at Briggs & Stratton now.\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Tulane University, hmm, I must admit I don't recall having any friends from there either. Briggs & Stratton also doesn't strike as familiar in terms of the companies my friends work for. Going back to what you mentioned about Aramark, I have quite a bit of acquaintances there. Small world indeed! By the way, do you perhaps know anyone who majored in Library Science? I found that to be a very unique major among my friends Carol and Herman.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Library Science, well that's indeed unique! As a matter of fact, Randy, a good friend of mine studied Library Science at Holy Cross College. He's quite an interesting person to talk to. Speaking of interesting, do you know anyone who studied Middle Eastern Languages? I have friends who pursued that major, and their knowledge of different cultures is truly fascinating!\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Middle Eastern Languages, now that's a fascinating subject! My friend Kelly actually majored in Middle Eastern Languages at Hood College. The depth of her understanding and insights into different cultures truly impresses me. By the way, you mentioned Holy Cross College before. I find it interesting that you have friends from a varied set of academic backgrounds. Do you by any chance know someone from Illinois Tool Works?\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Yes, speaking of Illinois Tool Works, my friend Richard works there. He studied German at University of Dubuque. Quite an interesting man, Richard. By any chance, do you know someone from Eastern Michigan University? My friend William, who studied Ceramic Engineering, attended that university.\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ah, Eastern Michigan University. I have a friend Lloyd who attended that university. Unlike William, he decided to opt for Geophysical Engineering, as you can tell, he was quite fascinated by earth sciences. Speaking of professions, I find that the movie industry is quite fascinating. Do you know anyone associated with Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer?\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"The movie industry is indeed enticing! However, I don't really know anyone from Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer. Most of my connections are in the tech industry. That's quite interesting though, the variety of fields our friends are involved in. By the way, have you met anyone who studied Mathematics Education? I have a friend Cody who graduated with that major from Metropolitan State University, and now he's working at LinkedIn, helping provide professional opportunities to others.\"\n\nTurn #13: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, Mathematics Education! Yes, I know someone, Gracie, who graduated with that major from Ithaca College as we've discussed earlier. However, I don't have any connections with those from the Metropolitan State University nor do I know anyone at LinkedIn. It is indeed interesting to hear about the diverse fields our friends are in. Speaking of diversity, do you by any chance know anyone who studied Greek? I have a friend Kathleen who studied Greek at William Mitchell College of Law.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Greek, that's a language I don't hear about often! Unfortunately, I don't know anyone who studied Greek. I'm more familiar with people from technological and mathematical backgrounds. The breadth of subjects people pursue never ceases to amaze me!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nSamuel Anderson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nGracie: School: Ithaca College Major: Mathematics Education Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nAda: School: Tulane University Major: Computer Engineering Company: Briggs & Stratton Location Preference: indoor \nSergio: School: LeTourneau University Major: Economics Company: Savers Location Preference: indoor \nWilliam: School: Eastern Michigan University Major: Ceramic Engineering Company: Xenco Medical Location Preference: indoor \nHarry: School: Creighton University Major: Computer Engineering Company: Speedway Motorsports Location Preference: indoor \nTyler: School: Columbia College Chicago Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nRichard: School: University of Dubuque Major: German Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: indoor \nRandy: School: Holy Cross College Major: Library Science Company: American Licorice Company Location Preference: indoor \nMarquerite: School: Ithaca College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nJack: School: Creighton University Major: Chinese Company: Speedway Motorsports Location Preference: outdoor \nCody: School: Metropolitan State University Major: Mathematics Education Company: LinkedIn Location Preference: indoor \nShirley: School: Augsburg College Major: Senior High Education Company: Demaco Location Preference: indoor \n\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey there! Nice party, isn't it? Have you been to Ithaca College by any chance? I know quite a few people from that school.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello! Yes, it is a wonderful party. As for Ithaca College, I haven't been there personally, but I do have friends who studied there. Gracie, a wonderful mathematician, and Brian, quite a tech whiz, both attended Ithaca. Small world, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"What a fun coincidence, Gracie is a friend of mine too! She indeed has a knack for numbers. Do you happen to know someone who studied Economics at LeTourneau University? My buddy Sergio went there and he seems to know half of the world!\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, LeTourneau University... I don't personally have any friends from there. All my friends who studied Economics went to University of Arkansas - Monticello, like my friend Mark. It's amazing though how interconnected everything can become in academia, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, the academic world sure feels interconnected at times! By any chance, do you know anyone from Creighton University? I have a couple of friends who studied there, including a skilled fellow in Computer Engineering. He works for a company named Speedway Motorsports now.\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Creighton University? I can't say I have connections there. None of my friends seem to be part of the Speedway Motorsports circle either. However, speaking of companies, do you happen to know anyone from the Mesa Airlines or Aramark?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Aramark does ring a bell as few of my friends are associated with it. Tyler and Marquerite both from distinctive linguistic backgrounds, and Gracie you already know, work there. As for Mesa Airlines, I can't recall anyone from there. Sailing back to the academia, do you know anyone from Tulane University? I\u2019m quite close to a certain Computer Engineering alum who works at Briggs & Stratton now.\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Tulane University, hmm, I must admit I don't recall having any friends from there either. Briggs & Stratton also doesn't strike as familiar in terms of the companies my friends work for. Going back to what you mentioned about Aramark, I have quite a bit of acquaintances there. Small world indeed! By the way, do you perhaps know anyone who majored in Library Science? I found that to be a very unique major among my friends Carol and Herman.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Library Science, well that's indeed unique! As a matter of fact, Randy, a good friend of mine studied Library Science at Holy Cross College. He's quite an interesting person to talk to. Speaking of interesting, do you know anyone who studied Middle Eastern Languages? I have friends who pursued that major, and their knowledge of different cultures is truly fascinating!\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Middle Eastern Languages, now that's a fascinating subject! My friend Kelly actually majored in Middle Eastern Languages at Hood College. The depth of her understanding and insights into different cultures truly impresses me. By the way, you mentioned Holy Cross College before. I find it interesting that you have friends from a varied set of academic backgrounds. Do you by any chance know someone from Illinois Tool Works?\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Yes, speaking of Illinois Tool Works, my friend Richard works there. He studied German at University of Dubuque. Quite an interesting man, Richard. By any chance, do you know someone from Eastern Michigan University? My friend William, who studied Ceramic Engineering, attended that university.\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ah, Eastern Michigan University. I have a friend Lloyd who attended that university. Unlike William, he decided to opt for Geophysical Engineering, as you can tell, he was quite fascinated by earth sciences. Speaking of professions, I find that the movie industry is quite fascinating. Do you know anyone associated with Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer?\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"The movie industry is indeed enticing! However, I don't really know anyone from Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer. Most of my connections are in the tech industry. That's quite interesting though, the variety of fields our friends are involved in. By the way, have you met anyone who studied Mathematics Education? I have a friend Cody who graduated with that major from Metropolitan State University, and now he's working at LinkedIn, helping provide professional opportunities to others.\"\n\nTurn #13: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, Mathematics Education! Yes, I know someone, Gracie, who graduated with that major from Ithaca College as we've discussed earlier. However, I don't have any connections with those from the Metropolitan State University nor do I know anyone at LinkedIn. It is indeed interesting to hear about the diverse fields our friends are in. Speaking of diversity, do you by any chance know anyone who studied Greek? I have a friend Kathleen who studied Greek at William Mitchell College of Law.\"\n\nTurn #14: Samuel Anderson said: \"Greek, that's a language I don't hear about often! Unfortunately, I don't know anyone who studied Greek. I'm more familiar with people from technological and mathematical backgrounds. The breadth of subjects people pursue never ceases to amaze me!\"\n\nTurn #15: Hendrick Heinz left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nKathleen: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Greek Company: Demaco Location Preference: indoor \nCarol: School: Hood College Major: Library Science Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: outdoor \nHerman: School: University of Puget Sound Major: Library Science Company: Mesa Airlines Location Preference: indoor \nMatthew: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Asian & Pacific Area Studies Company: Savers Location Preference: indoor \nMark: School: University of Arkansas - Monticello Major: Economics Company: Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Location Preference: outdoor \nDeborah: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Pre-Law Company: Aramark Location Preference: outdoor \nKelly: School: Hood College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Mesa Airlines Location Preference: outdoor \nGracie: School: Ithaca College Major: Mathematics Education Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nEtta: School: University of Arkansas - Monticello Major: Judaism & Jewish Studies Company: Aramark Location Preference: outdoor \nNatasha: School: Thomas Edison State College Major: Linguistics Company: Invacare Corporation Location Preference: outdoor \nLloyd: School: Eastern Michigan University Major: Geophysical Engineering Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: outdoor \nBrian: School: Ithaca College Major: Asian & Pacific Area Studies Company: Orange Micro Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey there! Nice party, isn't it? Have you been to Ithaca College by any chance? I know quite a few people from that school.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hello! Yes, it is a wonderful party. As for Ithaca College, I haven't been there personally, but I do have friends who studied there. Gracie, a wonderful mathematician, and Brian, quite a tech whiz, both attended Ithaca. Small world, isn't it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nKathleen: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Greek Company: Demaco Location Preference: indoor \nCarol: School: Hood College Major: Library Science Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: outdoor \nHerman: School: University of Puget Sound Major: Library Science Company: Mesa Airlines Location Preference: indoor \nMatthew: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Asian & Pacific Area Studies Company: Savers Location Preference: indoor \nMark: School: University of Arkansas - Monticello Major: Economics Company: Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Location Preference: outdoor \nDeborah: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Pre-Law Company: Aramark Location Preference: outdoor \nKelly: School: Hood College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Mesa Airlines Location Preference: outdoor \nGracie: School: Ithaca College Major: Mathematics Education Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nEtta: School: University of Arkansas - Monticello Major: Judaism & Jewish Studies Company: Aramark Location Preference: outdoor \nNatasha: School: Thomas Edison State College Major: Linguistics Company: Invacare Corporation Location Preference: outdoor \nLloyd: School: Eastern Michigan University Major: Geophysical Engineering Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: outdoor \nBrian: School: Ithaca College Major: Asian & Pacific Area Studies Company: Orange Micro Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey there! Nice party, isn't it? Have you been to Ithaca College by any chance? I know quite a few people from that school.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello! Yes, it is a wonderful party. As for Ithaca College, I haven't been there personally, but I do have friends who studied there. Gracie, a wonderful mathematician, and Brian, quite a tech whiz, both attended Ithaca. Small world, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"What a fun coincidence, Gracie is a friend of mine too! She indeed has a knack for numbers. Do you happen to know someone who studied Economics at LeTourneau University? My buddy Sergio went there and he seems to know half of the world!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oh, LeTourneau University... I don't personally have any friends from there. All my friends who studied Economics went to University of Arkansas - Monticello, like my friend Mark. It's amazing though how interconnected everything can become in academia, isn't it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nKathleen: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Greek Company: Demaco Location Preference: indoor \nCarol: School: Hood College Major: Library Science Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: outdoor \nHerman: School: University of Puget Sound Major: Library Science Company: Mesa Airlines Location Preference: indoor \nMatthew: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Asian & Pacific Area Studies Company: Savers Location Preference: indoor \nMark: School: University of Arkansas - Monticello Major: Economics Company: Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Location Preference: outdoor \nDeborah: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Pre-Law Company: Aramark Location Preference: outdoor \nKelly: School: Hood College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Mesa Airlines Location Preference: outdoor \nGracie: School: Ithaca College Major: Mathematics Education Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nEtta: School: University of Arkansas - Monticello Major: Judaism & Jewish Studies Company: Aramark Location Preference: outdoor \nNatasha: School: Thomas Edison State College Major: Linguistics Company: Invacare Corporation Location Preference: outdoor \nLloyd: School: Eastern Michigan University Major: Geophysical Engineering Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: outdoor \nBrian: School: Ithaca College Major: Asian & Pacific Area Studies Company: Orange Micro Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey there! Nice party, isn't it? Have you been to Ithaca College by any chance? I know quite a few people from that school.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello! Yes, it is a wonderful party. As for Ithaca College, I haven't been there personally, but I do have friends who studied there. Gracie, a wonderful mathematician, and Brian, quite a tech whiz, both attended Ithaca. Small world, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"What a fun coincidence, Gracie is a friend of mine too! She indeed has a knack for numbers. Do you happen to know someone who studied Economics at LeTourneau University? My buddy Sergio went there and he seems to know half of the world!\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, LeTourneau University... I don't personally have any friends from there. All my friends who studied Economics went to University of Arkansas - Monticello, like my friend Mark. It's amazing though how interconnected everything can become in academia, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, the academic world sure feels interconnected at times! By any chance, do you know anyone from Creighton University? I have a couple of friends who studied there, including a skilled fellow in Computer Engineering. He works for a company named Speedway Motorsports now.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Creighton University? I can't say I have connections there. None of my friends seem to be part of the Speedway Motorsports circle either. However, speaking of companies, do you happen to know anyone from the Mesa Airlines or Aramark?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nKathleen: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Greek Company: Demaco Location Preference: indoor \nCarol: School: Hood College Major: Library Science Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: outdoor \nHerman: School: University of Puget Sound Major: Library Science Company: Mesa Airlines Location Preference: indoor \nMatthew: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Asian & Pacific Area Studies Company: Savers Location Preference: indoor \nMark: School: University of Arkansas - Monticello Major: Economics Company: Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Location Preference: outdoor \nDeborah: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Pre-Law Company: Aramark Location Preference: outdoor \nKelly: School: Hood College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Mesa Airlines Location Preference: outdoor \nGracie: School: Ithaca College Major: Mathematics Education Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nEtta: School: University of Arkansas - Monticello Major: Judaism & Jewish Studies Company: Aramark Location Preference: outdoor \nNatasha: School: Thomas Edison State College Major: Linguistics Company: Invacare Corporation Location Preference: outdoor \nLloyd: School: Eastern Michigan University Major: Geophysical Engineering Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: outdoor \nBrian: School: Ithaca College Major: Asian & Pacific Area Studies Company: Orange Micro Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey there! Nice party, isn't it? Have you been to Ithaca College by any chance? I know quite a few people from that school.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello! Yes, it is a wonderful party. As for Ithaca College, I haven't been there personally, but I do have friends who studied there. Gracie, a wonderful mathematician, and Brian, quite a tech whiz, both attended Ithaca. Small world, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"What a fun coincidence, Gracie is a friend of mine too! She indeed has a knack for numbers. Do you happen to know someone who studied Economics at LeTourneau University? My buddy Sergio went there and he seems to know half of the world!\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, LeTourneau University... I don't personally have any friends from there. All my friends who studied Economics went to University of Arkansas - Monticello, like my friend Mark. It's amazing though how interconnected everything can become in academia, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, the academic world sure feels interconnected at times! By any chance, do you know anyone from Creighton University? I have a couple of friends who studied there, including a skilled fellow in Computer Engineering. He works for a company named Speedway Motorsports now.\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Creighton University? I can't say I have connections there. None of my friends seem to be part of the Speedway Motorsports circle either. However, speaking of companies, do you happen to know anyone from the Mesa Airlines or Aramark?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Aramark does ring a bell as few of my friends are associated with it. Tyler and Marquerite both from distinctive linguistic backgrounds, and Gracie you already know, work there. As for Mesa Airlines, I can't recall anyone from there. Sailing back to the academia, do you know anyone from Tulane University? I\u2019m quite close to a certain Computer Engineering alum who works at Briggs & Stratton now.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Tulane University, hmm, I must admit I don't recall having any friends from there either. Briggs & Stratton also doesn't strike as familiar in terms of the companies my friends work for. Going back to what you mentioned about Aramark, I have quite a bit of acquaintances there. Small world indeed! By the way, do you perhaps know anyone who majored in Library Science? I found that to be a very unique major among my friends Carol and Herman.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nKathleen: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Greek Company: Demaco Location Preference: indoor \nCarol: School: Hood College Major: Library Science Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: outdoor \nHerman: School: University of Puget Sound Major: Library Science Company: Mesa Airlines Location Preference: indoor \nMatthew: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Asian & Pacific Area Studies Company: Savers Location Preference: indoor \nMark: School: University of Arkansas - Monticello Major: Economics Company: Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Location Preference: outdoor \nDeborah: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Pre-Law Company: Aramark Location Preference: outdoor \nKelly: School: Hood College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Mesa Airlines Location Preference: outdoor \nGracie: School: Ithaca College Major: Mathematics Education Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nEtta: School: University of Arkansas - Monticello Major: Judaism & Jewish Studies Company: Aramark Location Preference: outdoor \nNatasha: School: Thomas Edison State College Major: Linguistics Company: Invacare Corporation Location Preference: outdoor \nLloyd: School: Eastern Michigan University Major: Geophysical Engineering Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: outdoor \nBrian: School: Ithaca College Major: Asian & Pacific Area Studies Company: Orange Micro Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey there! Nice party, isn't it? Have you been to Ithaca College by any chance? I know quite a few people from that school.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello! Yes, it is a wonderful party. As for Ithaca College, I haven't been there personally, but I do have friends who studied there. Gracie, a wonderful mathematician, and Brian, quite a tech whiz, both attended Ithaca. Small world, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"What a fun coincidence, Gracie is a friend of mine too! She indeed has a knack for numbers. Do you happen to know someone who studied Economics at LeTourneau University? My buddy Sergio went there and he seems to know half of the world!\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, LeTourneau University... I don't personally have any friends from there. All my friends who studied Economics went to University of Arkansas - Monticello, like my friend Mark. It's amazing though how interconnected everything can become in academia, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, the academic world sure feels interconnected at times! By any chance, do you know anyone from Creighton University? I have a couple of friends who studied there, including a skilled fellow in Computer Engineering. He works for a company named Speedway Motorsports now.\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Creighton University? I can't say I have connections there. None of my friends seem to be part of the Speedway Motorsports circle either. However, speaking of companies, do you happen to know anyone from the Mesa Airlines or Aramark?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Aramark does ring a bell as few of my friends are associated with it. Tyler and Marquerite both from distinctive linguistic backgrounds, and Gracie you already know, work there. As for Mesa Airlines, I can't recall anyone from there. Sailing back to the academia, do you know anyone from Tulane University? I\u2019m quite close to a certain Computer Engineering alum who works at Briggs & Stratton now.\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Tulane University, hmm, I must admit I don't recall having any friends from there either. Briggs & Stratton also doesn't strike as familiar in terms of the companies my friends work for. Going back to what you mentioned about Aramark, I have quite a bit of acquaintances there. Small world indeed! By the way, do you perhaps know anyone who majored in Library Science? I found that to be a very unique major among my friends Carol and Herman.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Library Science, well that's indeed unique! As a matter of fact, Randy, a good friend of mine studied Library Science at Holy Cross College. He's quite an interesting person to talk to. Speaking of interesting, do you know anyone who studied Middle Eastern Languages? I have friends who pursued that major, and their knowledge of different cultures is truly fascinating!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Middle Eastern Languages, now that's a fascinating subject! My friend Kelly actually majored in Middle Eastern Languages at Hood College. The depth of her understanding and insights into different cultures truly impresses me. By the way, you mentioned Holy Cross College before. I find it interesting that you have friends from a varied set of academic backgrounds. Do you by any chance know someone from Illinois Tool Works?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nKathleen: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Greek Company: Demaco Location Preference: indoor \nCarol: School: Hood College Major: Library Science Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: outdoor \nHerman: School: University of Puget Sound Major: Library Science Company: Mesa Airlines Location Preference: indoor \nMatthew: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Asian & Pacific Area Studies Company: Savers Location Preference: indoor \nMark: School: University of Arkansas - Monticello Major: Economics Company: Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Location Preference: outdoor \nDeborah: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Pre-Law Company: Aramark Location Preference: outdoor \nKelly: School: Hood College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Mesa Airlines Location Preference: outdoor \nGracie: School: Ithaca College Major: Mathematics Education Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nEtta: School: University of Arkansas - Monticello Major: Judaism & Jewish Studies Company: Aramark Location Preference: outdoor \nNatasha: School: Thomas Edison State College Major: Linguistics Company: Invacare Corporation Location Preference: outdoor \nLloyd: School: Eastern Michigan University Major: Geophysical Engineering Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: outdoor \nBrian: School: Ithaca College Major: Asian & Pacific Area Studies Company: Orange Micro Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey there! Nice party, isn't it? Have you been to Ithaca College by any chance? I know quite a few people from that school.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello! Yes, it is a wonderful party. As for Ithaca College, I haven't been there personally, but I do have friends who studied there. Gracie, a wonderful mathematician, and Brian, quite a tech whiz, both attended Ithaca. Small world, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"What a fun coincidence, Gracie is a friend of mine too! She indeed has a knack for numbers. Do you happen to know someone who studied Economics at LeTourneau University? My buddy Sergio went there and he seems to know half of the world!\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, LeTourneau University... I don't personally have any friends from there. All my friends who studied Economics went to University of Arkansas - Monticello, like my friend Mark. It's amazing though how interconnected everything can become in academia, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, the academic world sure feels interconnected at times! By any chance, do you know anyone from Creighton University? I have a couple of friends who studied there, including a skilled fellow in Computer Engineering. He works for a company named Speedway Motorsports now.\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Creighton University? I can't say I have connections there. None of my friends seem to be part of the Speedway Motorsports circle either. However, speaking of companies, do you happen to know anyone from the Mesa Airlines or Aramark?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Aramark does ring a bell as few of my friends are associated with it. Tyler and Marquerite both from distinctive linguistic backgrounds, and Gracie you already know, work there. As for Mesa Airlines, I can't recall anyone from there. Sailing back to the academia, do you know anyone from Tulane University? I\u2019m quite close to a certain Computer Engineering alum who works at Briggs & Stratton now.\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Tulane University, hmm, I must admit I don't recall having any friends from there either. Briggs & Stratton also doesn't strike as familiar in terms of the companies my friends work for. Going back to what you mentioned about Aramark, I have quite a bit of acquaintances there. Small world indeed! By the way, do you perhaps know anyone who majored in Library Science? I found that to be a very unique major among my friends Carol and Herman.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Library Science, well that's indeed unique! As a matter of fact, Randy, a good friend of mine studied Library Science at Holy Cross College. He's quite an interesting person to talk to. Speaking of interesting, do you know anyone who studied Middle Eastern Languages? I have friends who pursued that major, and their knowledge of different cultures is truly fascinating!\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Middle Eastern Languages, now that's a fascinating subject! My friend Kelly actually majored in Middle Eastern Languages at Hood College. The depth of her understanding and insights into different cultures truly impresses me. By the way, you mentioned Holy Cross College before. I find it interesting that you have friends from a varied set of academic backgrounds. Do you by any chance know someone from Illinois Tool Works?\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Yes, speaking of Illinois Tool Works, my friend Richard works there. He studied German at University of Dubuque. Quite an interesting man, Richard. By any chance, do you know someone from Eastern Michigan University? My friend William, who studied Ceramic Engineering, attended that university.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Ah, Eastern Michigan University. I have a friend Lloyd who attended that university. Unlike William, he decided to opt for Geophysical Engineering, as you can tell, he was quite fascinated by earth sciences. Speaking of professions, I find that the movie industry is quite fascinating. Do you know anyone associated with Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nKathleen: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Greek Company: Demaco Location Preference: indoor \nCarol: School: Hood College Major: Library Science Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: outdoor \nHerman: School: University of Puget Sound Major: Library Science Company: Mesa Airlines Location Preference: indoor \nMatthew: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Asian & Pacific Area Studies Company: Savers Location Preference: indoor \nMark: School: University of Arkansas - Monticello Major: Economics Company: Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Location Preference: outdoor \nDeborah: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Pre-Law Company: Aramark Location Preference: outdoor \nKelly: School: Hood College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Mesa Airlines Location Preference: outdoor \nGracie: School: Ithaca College Major: Mathematics Education Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nEtta: School: University of Arkansas - Monticello Major: Judaism & Jewish Studies Company: Aramark Location Preference: outdoor \nNatasha: School: Thomas Edison State College Major: Linguistics Company: Invacare Corporation Location Preference: outdoor \nLloyd: School: Eastern Michigan University Major: Geophysical Engineering Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: outdoor \nBrian: School: Ithaca College Major: Asian & Pacific Area Studies Company: Orange Micro Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey there! Nice party, isn't it? Have you been to Ithaca College by any chance? I know quite a few people from that school.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello! Yes, it is a wonderful party. As for Ithaca College, I haven't been there personally, but I do have friends who studied there. Gracie, a wonderful mathematician, and Brian, quite a tech whiz, both attended Ithaca. Small world, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"What a fun coincidence, Gracie is a friend of mine too! She indeed has a knack for numbers. Do you happen to know someone who studied Economics at LeTourneau University? My buddy Sergio went there and he seems to know half of the world!\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, LeTourneau University... I don't personally have any friends from there. All my friends who studied Economics went to University of Arkansas - Monticello, like my friend Mark. It's amazing though how interconnected everything can become in academia, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, the academic world sure feels interconnected at times! By any chance, do you know anyone from Creighton University? I have a couple of friends who studied there, including a skilled fellow in Computer Engineering. He works for a company named Speedway Motorsports now.\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Creighton University? I can't say I have connections there. None of my friends seem to be part of the Speedway Motorsports circle either. However, speaking of companies, do you happen to know anyone from the Mesa Airlines or Aramark?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Aramark does ring a bell as few of my friends are associated with it. Tyler and Marquerite both from distinctive linguistic backgrounds, and Gracie you already know, work there. As for Mesa Airlines, I can't recall anyone from there. Sailing back to the academia, do you know anyone from Tulane University? I\u2019m quite close to a certain Computer Engineering alum who works at Briggs & Stratton now.\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Tulane University, hmm, I must admit I don't recall having any friends from there either. Briggs & Stratton also doesn't strike as familiar in terms of the companies my friends work for. Going back to what you mentioned about Aramark, I have quite a bit of acquaintances there. Small world indeed! By the way, do you perhaps know anyone who majored in Library Science? I found that to be a very unique major among my friends Carol and Herman.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Library Science, well that's indeed unique! As a matter of fact, Randy, a good friend of mine studied Library Science at Holy Cross College. He's quite an interesting person to talk to. Speaking of interesting, do you know anyone who studied Middle Eastern Languages? I have friends who pursued that major, and their knowledge of different cultures is truly fascinating!\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Middle Eastern Languages, now that's a fascinating subject! My friend Kelly actually majored in Middle Eastern Languages at Hood College. The depth of her understanding and insights into different cultures truly impresses me. By the way, you mentioned Holy Cross College before. I find it interesting that you have friends from a varied set of academic backgrounds. Do you by any chance know someone from Illinois Tool Works?\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Yes, speaking of Illinois Tool Works, my friend Richard works there. He studied German at University of Dubuque. Quite an interesting man, Richard. By any chance, do you know someone from Eastern Michigan University? My friend William, who studied Ceramic Engineering, attended that university.\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ah, Eastern Michigan University. I have a friend Lloyd who attended that university. Unlike William, he decided to opt for Geophysical Engineering, as you can tell, he was quite fascinated by earth sciences. Speaking of professions, I find that the movie industry is quite fascinating. Do you know anyone associated with Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer?\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"The movie industry is indeed enticing! However, I don't really know anyone from Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer. Most of my connections are in the tech industry. That's quite interesting though, the variety of fields our friends are involved in. By the way, have you met anyone who studied Mathematics Education? I have a friend Cody who graduated with that major from Metropolitan State University, and now he's working at LinkedIn, helping provide professional opportunities to others.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oh, Mathematics Education! Yes, I know someone, Gracie, who graduated with that major from Ithaca College as we've discussed earlier. However, I don't have any connections with those from the Metropolitan State University nor do I know anyone at LinkedIn. It is indeed interesting to hear about the diverse fields our friends are in. Speaking of diversity, do you by any chance know anyone who studied Greek? I have a friend Kathleen who studied Greek at William Mitchell College of Law.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nKathleen: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Greek Company: Demaco Location Preference: indoor \nCarol: School: Hood College Major: Library Science Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: outdoor \nHerman: School: University of Puget Sound Major: Library Science Company: Mesa Airlines Location Preference: indoor \nMatthew: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Asian & Pacific Area Studies Company: Savers Location Preference: indoor \nMark: School: University of Arkansas - Monticello Major: Economics Company: Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Location Preference: outdoor \nDeborah: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Pre-Law Company: Aramark Location Preference: outdoor \nKelly: School: Hood College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Mesa Airlines Location Preference: outdoor \nGracie: School: Ithaca College Major: Mathematics Education Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nEtta: School: University of Arkansas - Monticello Major: Judaism & Jewish Studies Company: Aramark Location Preference: outdoor \nNatasha: School: Thomas Edison State College Major: Linguistics Company: Invacare Corporation Location Preference: outdoor \nLloyd: School: Eastern Michigan University Major: Geophysical Engineering Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: outdoor \nBrian: School: Ithaca College Major: Asian & Pacific Area Studies Company: Orange Micro Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hey there! Nice party, isn't it? Have you been to Ithaca College by any chance? I know quite a few people from that school.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello! Yes, it is a wonderful party. As for Ithaca College, I haven't been there personally, but I do have friends who studied there. Gracie, a wonderful mathematician, and Brian, quite a tech whiz, both attended Ithaca. Small world, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"What a fun coincidence, Gracie is a friend of mine too! She indeed has a knack for numbers. Do you happen to know someone who studied Economics at LeTourneau University? My buddy Sergio went there and he seems to know half of the world!\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, LeTourneau University... I don't personally have any friends from there. All my friends who studied Economics went to University of Arkansas - Monticello, like my friend Mark. It's amazing though how interconnected everything can become in academia, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Absolutely, the academic world sure feels interconnected at times! By any chance, do you know anyone from Creighton University? I have a couple of friends who studied there, including a skilled fellow in Computer Engineering. He works for a company named Speedway Motorsports now.\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Creighton University? I can't say I have connections there. None of my friends seem to be part of the Speedway Motorsports circle either. However, speaking of companies, do you happen to know anyone from the Mesa Airlines or Aramark?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Aramark does ring a bell as few of my friends are associated with it. Tyler and Marquerite both from distinctive linguistic backgrounds, and Gracie you already know, work there. As for Mesa Airlines, I can't recall anyone from there. Sailing back to the academia, do you know anyone from Tulane University? I\u2019m quite close to a certain Computer Engineering alum who works at Briggs & Stratton now.\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Tulane University, hmm, I must admit I don't recall having any friends from there either. Briggs & Stratton also doesn't strike as familiar in terms of the companies my friends work for. Going back to what you mentioned about Aramark, I have quite a bit of acquaintances there. Small world indeed! By the way, do you perhaps know anyone who majored in Library Science? I found that to be a very unique major among my friends Carol and Herman.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Library Science, well that's indeed unique! As a matter of fact, Randy, a good friend of mine studied Library Science at Holy Cross College. He's quite an interesting person to talk to. Speaking of interesting, do you know anyone who studied Middle Eastern Languages? I have friends who pursued that major, and their knowledge of different cultures is truly fascinating!\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Middle Eastern Languages, now that's a fascinating subject! My friend Kelly actually majored in Middle Eastern Languages at Hood College. The depth of her understanding and insights into different cultures truly impresses me. By the way, you mentioned Holy Cross College before. I find it interesting that you have friends from a varied set of academic backgrounds. Do you by any chance know someone from Illinois Tool Works?\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Yes, speaking of Illinois Tool Works, my friend Richard works there. He studied German at University of Dubuque. Quite an interesting man, Richard. By any chance, do you know someone from Eastern Michigan University? My friend William, who studied Ceramic Engineering, attended that university.\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ah, Eastern Michigan University. I have a friend Lloyd who attended that university. Unlike William, he decided to opt for Geophysical Engineering, as you can tell, he was quite fascinated by earth sciences. Speaking of professions, I find that the movie industry is quite fascinating. Do you know anyone associated with Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer?\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"The movie industry is indeed enticing! However, I don't really know anyone from Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer. Most of my connections are in the tech industry. That's quite interesting though, the variety of fields our friends are involved in. By the way, have you met anyone who studied Mathematics Education? I have a friend Cody who graduated with that major from Metropolitan State University, and now he's working at LinkedIn, helping provide professional opportunities to others.\"\n\nTurn #13: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, Mathematics Education! Yes, I know someone, Gracie, who graduated with that major from Ithaca College as we've discussed earlier. However, I don't have any connections with those from the Metropolitan State University nor do I know anyone at LinkedIn. It is indeed interesting to hear about the diverse fields our friends are in. Speaking of diversity, do you by any chance know anyone who studied Greek? I have a friend Kathleen who studied Greek at William Mitchell College of Law.\"\n\nTurn #14: Samuel Anderson said: \"Greek, that's a language I don't hear about often! Unfortunately, I don't know anyone who studied Greek. I'm more familiar with people from technological and mathematical backgrounds. The breadth of subjects people pursue never ceases to amaze me!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person has put up their Bell\\'O TV Stand - Black Glass and Wood Trim for sale at $125.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. The item on sale is a beautiful 42\" Bell\\'O TV Stand, featuring black glass with an elegant wood trim. The stand measures 23 inches in height and 21 1/2 inches in depth.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nEsmeralda Solis's background: \nMiles Hawkins's goal: You are the buyer for this item and your target price is $112.00. Be aware that you may be penalized if you purchase it for a significantly higher price than the target. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Hi Esmeralda, I\u2019ve been looking for a TV stand like this for a while for my kitchen TV, I like the black glass and wood trim. However, the price is a bit high for me. Would you consider taking $112 for it?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person has put up their Bell\\'O TV Stand - Black Glass and Wood Trim for sale at $125.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. The item on sale is a beautiful 42\" Bell\\'O TV Stand, featuring black glass with an elegant wood trim. The stand measures 23 inches in height and 21 1/2 inches in depth.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nEsmeralda Solis's background: \nMiles Hawkins's goal: You are the buyer for this item and your target price is $112.00. Be aware that you may be penalized if you purchase it for a significantly higher price than the target. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hi Esmeralda, I\u2019ve been looking for a TV stand like this for a while for my kitchen TV, I like the black glass and wood trim. However, the price is a bit high for me. Would you consider taking $112 for it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Hi Miles! I'm glad you're interested in the TV stand. I must say, it's quite a beauty and would definitely add some elegance to your kitchen. As for the price, how about meeting halfway at $118.50? It's a little above your offer but still lower than the original price.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ah Esmeralda, but you see I won't be using it for anything other than my old kitchen TV. I appreciate your compromise though, it's still pretty generous. I'd really be grateful if you could lean towards $112, is that doable?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nEsmeralda Solis's background: \nMiles Hawkins's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDavid: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Christian Moerlein Brewing Company Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nLarry: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nLynn: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Cray Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nDonald: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Advance Auto Parts Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nDennis: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nJane: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Planet Hollywood Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nHarvey: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: Sony Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nNinfa: Hobby: Quilting Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nAngelica: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Planet Hollywood Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \n\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hello there, Esmeralda. I couldn't help but overhear that you enjoy homebrewing. Is that right?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Oh, well, homebrewing isn't quite my cup of tea Miles. However, could you help me remember? I believe we might have a mutual friend who is also passionate about it. Does the name Harvey ring a bell? He loves amateur radio, and works at Sony, if that helps jog your memory.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oh, sure I know Harvey! Quite the interesting character, isn't he? He makes my passion for gardening seems rather mainstream in comparison. Speaking of gardening, I've got this friend, David, who is into homebrewing. He works at the Christian Moerlein Brewing Company. Do you happen to know him?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person has put up their Bell\\'O TV Stand - Black Glass and Wood Trim for sale at $125.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. The item on sale is a beautiful 42\" Bell\\'O TV Stand, featuring black glass with an elegant wood trim. The stand measures 23 inches in height and 21 1/2 inches in depth.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nEsmeralda Solis's background: \nMiles Hawkins's goal: You are the buyer for this item and your target price is $112.00. Be aware that you may be penalized if you purchase it for a significantly higher price than the target. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hi Esmeralda, I\u2019ve been looking for a TV stand like this for a while for my kitchen TV, I like the black glass and wood trim. However, the price is a bit high for me. Would you consider taking $112 for it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Hi Miles! I'm glad you're interested in the TV stand. I must say, it's quite a beauty and would definitely add some elegance to your kitchen. As for the price, how about meeting halfway at $118.50? It's a little above your offer but still lower than the original price.\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Ah Esmeralda, but you see I won't be using it for anything other than my old kitchen TV. I appreciate your compromise though, it's still pretty generous. I'd really be grateful if you could lean towards $112, is that doable?\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Miles, I absolutely understand that it's for your kitchen TV. However, considering the quality and the elegance, the stand is priced reasonably. Since you appreciate the design and quality, I can come down to $115. That is the final offer I can make. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"That's fair, Esmeralda. Let's go ahead with the $115. I'm sure the stand will look great in my kitchen. I appreciate your willingness to adjust the price. When can I come by to pick it up?\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Fantastic, Miles! I'm glad we could reach an agreement. You can come by to pick it up tomorrow after 6 PM, does that work for you? I assure you, this TV stand is going to add plenty of charm to your kitchen.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Tomorrow after 6 PM sounds perfect to me, Esmeralda. I'm sure this TV stand will indeed be a great addition to my kitchen. Thanks again for your understanding. See you then!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person has put up their Bell\\'O TV Stand - Black Glass and Wood Trim for sale at $125.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. The item on sale is a beautiful 42\" Bell\\'O TV Stand, featuring black glass with an elegant wood trim. The stand measures 23 inches in height and 21 1/2 inches in depth.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nEsmeralda Solis's background: \nMiles Hawkins's goal: You are the buyer for this item and your target price is $112.00. Be aware that you may be penalized if you purchase it for a significantly higher price than the target. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hi Esmeralda, I\u2019ve been looking for a TV stand like this for a while for my kitchen TV, I like the black glass and wood trim. However, the price is a bit high for me. Would you consider taking $112 for it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Hi Miles! I'm glad you're interested in the TV stand. I must say, it's quite a beauty and would definitely add some elegance to your kitchen. As for the price, how about meeting halfway at $118.50? It's a little above your offer but still lower than the original price.\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Ah Esmeralda, but you see I won't be using it for anything other than my old kitchen TV. I appreciate your compromise though, it's still pretty generous. I'd really be grateful if you could lean towards $112, is that doable?\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Miles, I absolutely understand that it's for your kitchen TV. However, considering the quality and the elegance, the stand is priced reasonably. Since you appreciate the design and quality, I can come down to $115. That is the final offer I can make. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"That's fair, Esmeralda. Let's go ahead with the $115. I'm sure the stand will look great in my kitchen. I appreciate your willingness to adjust the price. When can I come by to pick it up?\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Fantastic, Miles! I'm glad we could reach an agreement. You can come by to pick it up tomorrow after 6 PM, does that work for you? I assure you, this TV stand is going to add plenty of charm to your kitchen.\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins said: \"Tomorrow after 6 PM sounds perfect to me, Esmeralda. I'm sure this TV stand will indeed be a great addition to my kitchen. Thanks again for your understanding. See you then!\"\n\nTurn #7: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I'm looking forward to it as well, Miles! I'm certain you'll be pleased with the purchase. Thank you for your understanding and see you tomorrow at 6 PM. Have a great day!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person has put up their Bell\\'O TV Stand - Black Glass and Wood Trim for sale at $125.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. The item on sale is a beautiful 42\" Bell\\'O TV Stand, featuring black glass with an elegant wood trim. The stand measures 23 inches in height and 21 1/2 inches in depth.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: You are the seller for this item, and your target price is $76.9. Please be aware that you may face a penalty if the item is sold for a price significantly lower than the target price. However, a bonus will be rewarded if you manage to sell it for more than the target price.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hi Esmeralda, I\u2019ve been looking for a TV stand like this for a while for my kitchen TV, I like the black glass and wood trim. However, the price is a bit high for me. Would you consider taking $112 for it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hi Miles! I'm glad you're interested in the TV stand. I must say, it's quite a beauty and would definitely add some elegance to your kitchen. As for the price, how about meeting halfway at $118.50? It's a little above your offer but still lower than the original price.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person has put up their Bell\\'O TV Stand - Black Glass and Wood Trim for sale at $125.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. The item on sale is a beautiful 42\" Bell\\'O TV Stand, featuring black glass with an elegant wood trim. The stand measures 23 inches in height and 21 1/2 inches in depth.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: You are the seller for this item, and your target price is $76.9. Please be aware that you may face a penalty if the item is sold for a price significantly lower than the target price. However, a bonus will be rewarded if you manage to sell it for more than the target price.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hi Esmeralda, I\u2019ve been looking for a TV stand like this for a while for my kitchen TV, I like the black glass and wood trim. However, the price is a bit high for me. Would you consider taking $112 for it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Hi Miles! I'm glad you're interested in the TV stand. I must say, it's quite a beauty and would definitely add some elegance to your kitchen. As for the price, how about meeting halfway at $118.50? It's a little above your offer but still lower than the original price.\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Ah Esmeralda, but you see I won't be using it for anything other than my old kitchen TV. I appreciate your compromise though, it's still pretty generous. I'd really be grateful if you could lean towards $112, is that doable?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Miles, I absolutely understand that it's for your kitchen TV. However, considering the quality and the elegance, the stand is priced reasonably. Since you appreciate the design and quality, I can come down to $115. That is the final offer I can make. What do you say?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person has put up their Bell\\'O TV Stand - Black Glass and Wood Trim for sale at $125.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. The item on sale is a beautiful 42\" Bell\\'O TV Stand, featuring black glass with an elegant wood trim. The stand measures 23 inches in height and 21 1/2 inches in depth.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: You are the seller for this item, and your target price is $76.9. Please be aware that you may face a penalty if the item is sold for a price significantly lower than the target price. However, a bonus will be rewarded if you manage to sell it for more than the target price.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hi Esmeralda, I\u2019ve been looking for a TV stand like this for a while for my kitchen TV, I like the black glass and wood trim. However, the price is a bit high for me. Would you consider taking $112 for it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Hi Miles! I'm glad you're interested in the TV stand. I must say, it's quite a beauty and would definitely add some elegance to your kitchen. As for the price, how about meeting halfway at $118.50? It's a little above your offer but still lower than the original price.\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Ah Esmeralda, but you see I won't be using it for anything other than my old kitchen TV. I appreciate your compromise though, it's still pretty generous. I'd really be grateful if you could lean towards $112, is that doable?\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Miles, I absolutely understand that it's for your kitchen TV. However, considering the quality and the elegance, the stand is priced reasonably. Since you appreciate the design and quality, I can come down to $115. That is the final offer I can make. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"That's fair, Esmeralda. Let's go ahead with the $115. I'm sure the stand will look great in my kitchen. I appreciate your willingness to adjust the price. When can I come by to pick it up?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Fantastic, Miles! I'm glad we could reach an agreement. You can come by to pick it up tomorrow after 6 PM, does that work for you? I assure you, this TV stand is going to add plenty of charm to your kitchen.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person has put up their Bell\\'O TV Stand - Black Glass and Wood Trim for sale at $125.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. The item on sale is a beautiful 42\" Bell\\'O TV Stand, featuring black glass with an elegant wood trim. The stand measures 23 inches in height and 21 1/2 inches in depth.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: You are the seller for this item, and your target price is $76.9. Please be aware that you may face a penalty if the item is sold for a price significantly lower than the target price. However, a bonus will be rewarded if you manage to sell it for more than the target price.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hi Esmeralda, I\u2019ve been looking for a TV stand like this for a while for my kitchen TV, I like the black glass and wood trim. However, the price is a bit high for me. Would you consider taking $112 for it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Hi Miles! I'm glad you're interested in the TV stand. I must say, it's quite a beauty and would definitely add some elegance to your kitchen. As for the price, how about meeting halfway at $118.50? It's a little above your offer but still lower than the original price.\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Ah Esmeralda, but you see I won't be using it for anything other than my old kitchen TV. I appreciate your compromise though, it's still pretty generous. I'd really be grateful if you could lean towards $112, is that doable?\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Miles, I absolutely understand that it's for your kitchen TV. However, considering the quality and the elegance, the stand is priced reasonably. Since you appreciate the design and quality, I can come down to $115. That is the final offer I can make. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"That's fair, Esmeralda. Let's go ahead with the $115. I'm sure the stand will look great in my kitchen. I appreciate your willingness to adjust the price. When can I come by to pick it up?\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Fantastic, Miles! I'm glad we could reach an agreement. You can come by to pick it up tomorrow after 6 PM, does that work for you? I assure you, this TV stand is going to add plenty of charm to your kitchen.\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins said: \"Tomorrow after 6 PM sounds perfect to me, Esmeralda. I'm sure this TV stand will indeed be a great addition to my kitchen. Thanks again for your understanding. See you then!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm looking forward to it as well, Miles! I'm certain you'll be pleased with the purchase. Thank you for your understanding and see you tomorrow at 6 PM. Have a great day!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person has put up their Bell\\'O TV Stand - Black Glass and Wood Trim for sale at $125.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. The item on sale is a beautiful 42\" Bell\\'O TV Stand, featuring black glass with an elegant wood trim. The stand measures 23 inches in height and 21 1/2 inches in depth.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: You are the seller for this item, and your target price is $76.9. Please be aware that you may face a penalty if the item is sold for a price significantly lower than the target price. However, a bonus will be rewarded if you manage to sell it for more than the target price.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hi Esmeralda, I\u2019ve been looking for a TV stand like this for a while for my kitchen TV, I like the black glass and wood trim. However, the price is a bit high for me. Would you consider taking $112 for it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Hi Miles! I'm glad you're interested in the TV stand. I must say, it's quite a beauty and would definitely add some elegance to your kitchen. As for the price, how about meeting halfway at $118.50? It's a little above your offer but still lower than the original price.\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Ah Esmeralda, but you see I won't be using it for anything other than my old kitchen TV. I appreciate your compromise though, it's still pretty generous. I'd really be grateful if you could lean towards $112, is that doable?\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Miles, I absolutely understand that it's for your kitchen TV. However, considering the quality and the elegance, the stand is priced reasonably. Since you appreciate the design and quality, I can come down to $115. That is the final offer I can make. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"That's fair, Esmeralda. Let's go ahead with the $115. I'm sure the stand will look great in my kitchen. I appreciate your willingness to adjust the price. When can I come by to pick it up?\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Fantastic, Miles! I'm glad we could reach an agreement. You can come by to pick it up tomorrow after 6 PM, does that work for you? I assure you, this TV stand is going to add plenty of charm to your kitchen.\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins said: \"Tomorrow after 6 PM sounds perfect to me, Esmeralda. I'm sure this TV stand will indeed be a great addition to my kitchen. Thanks again for your understanding. See you then!\"\n\nTurn #7: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I'm looking forward to it as well, Miles! I'm certain you'll be pleased with the purchase. Thank you for your understanding and see you tomorrow at 6 PM. Have a great day!\"\n\nTurn #8: Miles Hawkins left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nZane Bennett's background: \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nAndrew: Hobby: Slot car racing School: Mount Senario College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Exxon \nMelissa: Hobby: Astronomy School: Weber State University Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Hornbeck Offshore Services \nAnna: Hobby: Climbing School: Valley City State University Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: National Airlines \nSoledad: Hobby: Parkour School: Valley City State University Major: Biological Specializations Company: Concur Technologies \nJohn: Hobby: Astronomy School: Mount Senario College Major: Fire Protection & Security Company: Gibson Guitar Corporation \nLawrence: Hobby: Sculling School: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Leonard Green & Partners \n\nZane Bennett's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey, I'm Giselle! You look like you've got some interesting stories. Do you have any hobbies? I'm big into biking and photography myself.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nZane Bennett's background: \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nAndrew: Hobby: Slot car racing School: Mount Senario College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Exxon \nMelissa: Hobby: Astronomy School: Weber State University Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Hornbeck Offshore Services \nAnna: Hobby: Climbing School: Valley City State University Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: National Airlines \nSoledad: Hobby: Parkour School: Valley City State University Major: Biological Specializations Company: Concur Technologies \nJohn: Hobby: Astronomy School: Mount Senario College Major: Fire Protection & Security Company: Gibson Guitar Corporation \nLawrence: Hobby: Sculling School: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Leonard Green & Partners \n\nZane Bennett's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hey, I'm Giselle! You look like you've got some interesting stories. Do you have any hobbies? I'm big into biking and photography myself.\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Hi Giselle, I'm Zane. That's cool, I also love getting creative. My hobby is music, I play guitar, and I'm a graphic designer. What's your profession? And do you like to play any sports in your downtime? I know a few people who enjoy badminton.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm an art student! Biking takes up most of my physical activity, badminton sounds intriguing though. Fascinating that you're a graphic designer and a musician, it's like blending visuals and sounds together. By the way, the guitar, do you know anyone from Gibson Guitar Corporation? One of my friends, John, is a big fan of their guitars and he works there.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nZane Bennett's background: \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nAndrew: Hobby: Slot car racing School: Mount Senario College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Exxon \nMelissa: Hobby: Astronomy School: Weber State University Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Hornbeck Offshore Services \nAnna: Hobby: Climbing School: Valley City State University Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: National Airlines \nSoledad: Hobby: Parkour School: Valley City State University Major: Biological Specializations Company: Concur Technologies \nJohn: Hobby: Astronomy School: Mount Senario College Major: Fire Protection & Security Company: Gibson Guitar Corporation \nLawrence: Hobby: Sculling School: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Leonard Green & Partners \n\nZane Bennett's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hey, I'm Giselle! You look like you've got some interesting stories. Do you have any hobbies? I'm big into biking and photography myself.\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Hi Giselle, I'm Zane. That's cool, I also love getting creative. My hobby is music, I play guitar, and I'm a graphic designer. What's your profession? And do you like to play any sports in your downtime? I know a few people who enjoy badminton.\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I'm an art student! Biking takes up most of my physical activity, badminton sounds intriguing though. Fascinating that you're a graphic designer and a musician, it's like blending visuals and sounds together. By the way, the guitar, do you know anyone from Gibson Guitar Corporation? One of my friends, John, is a big fan of their guitars and he works there.\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"It seems like you and John both have very refined tastes in music and the arts! I don't know anyone personally from Gibson Guitar Corporation. However, I do have a friend named Lawrence who's really into different sports like sculling, he studied Hispanic-American Studies at University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee and now works at Leonard Green & Partners. Have you by any chance crossed paths with him or anyone in similar circles?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Lawrence does sound familiar, though I'm not sure if we've officially met. Speaking of Hispanic-American Studies, another friend of mine, Melissa, who's into astronomy like John, also majored in that at Weber State University. She's currently at Hornbeck Offshore Services. Do you happen to know anyone from there?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nZane Bennett's background: \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nAndrew: Hobby: Slot car racing School: Mount Senario College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Exxon \nMelissa: Hobby: Astronomy School: Weber State University Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Hornbeck Offshore Services \nAnna: Hobby: Climbing School: Valley City State University Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: National Airlines \nSoledad: Hobby: Parkour School: Valley City State University Major: Biological Specializations Company: Concur Technologies \nJohn: Hobby: Astronomy School: Mount Senario College Major: Fire Protection & Security Company: Gibson Guitar Corporation \nLawrence: Hobby: Sculling School: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Leonard Green & Partners \n\nZane Bennett's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hey, I'm Giselle! You look like you've got some interesting stories. Do you have any hobbies? I'm big into biking and photography myself.\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Hi Giselle, I'm Zane. That's cool, I also love getting creative. My hobby is music, I play guitar, and I'm a graphic designer. What's your profession? And do you like to play any sports in your downtime? I know a few people who enjoy badminton.\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I'm an art student! Biking takes up most of my physical activity, badminton sounds intriguing though. Fascinating that you're a graphic designer and a musician, it's like blending visuals and sounds together. By the way, the guitar, do you know anyone from Gibson Guitar Corporation? One of my friends, John, is a big fan of their guitars and he works there.\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"It seems like you and John both have very refined tastes in music and the arts! I don't know anyone personally from Gibson Guitar Corporation. However, I do have a friend named Lawrence who's really into different sports like sculling, he studied Hispanic-American Studies at University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee and now works at Leonard Green & Partners. Have you by any chance crossed paths with him or anyone in similar circles?\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Lawrence does sound familiar, though I'm not sure if we've officially met. Speaking of Hispanic-American Studies, another friend of mine, Melissa, who's into astronomy like John, also majored in that at Weber State University. She's currently at Hornbeck Offshore Services. Do you happen to know anyone from there?\"\n\nTurn #5: Zane Bennett said: \"I see, Melissa's academic background does strike a chord, I guess Hispanic-American Studies attracts a lot of interesting folks! However, I don't think I know anyone at Hornbeck Offshore Services. Let's see...you mentioned John is into astronomy, that's quite fascinating. I have a friend, Josef, who has a strong interest in Curling, studied Middle Eastern Languages at California State University, Northridge, and currently works at Concur Technologies. This might be a long shot, but have you happened to meet him, or anyone who shares similar interests?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Curling and Middle Eastern Languages, how peculiar and interesting! My friend Andrew is into something like slot car racing and he studied Middle Eastern Languages at Mount Senario College and now he's with Exxon. As for Concur Technologies, I do know someone there, Soledad. She's heavily into parkour and studied Biological Specializations at Valley City State University. Could it be a small world after all, Zane?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nZane Bennett's background: \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nAndrew: Hobby: Slot car racing School: Mount Senario College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Exxon \nMelissa: Hobby: Astronomy School: Weber State University Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Hornbeck Offshore Services \nAnna: Hobby: Climbing School: Valley City State University Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: National Airlines \nSoledad: Hobby: Parkour School: Valley City State University Major: Biological Specializations Company: Concur Technologies \nJohn: Hobby: Astronomy School: Mount Senario College Major: Fire Protection & Security Company: Gibson Guitar Corporation \nLawrence: Hobby: Sculling School: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Leonard Green & Partners \n\nZane Bennett's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hey, I'm Giselle! You look like you've got some interesting stories. Do you have any hobbies? I'm big into biking and photography myself.\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Hi Giselle, I'm Zane. That's cool, I also love getting creative. My hobby is music, I play guitar, and I'm a graphic designer. What's your profession? And do you like to play any sports in your downtime? I know a few people who enjoy badminton.\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I'm an art student! Biking takes up most of my physical activity, badminton sounds intriguing though. Fascinating that you're a graphic designer and a musician, it's like blending visuals and sounds together. By the way, the guitar, do you know anyone from Gibson Guitar Corporation? One of my friends, John, is a big fan of their guitars and he works there.\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"It seems like you and John both have very refined tastes in music and the arts! I don't know anyone personally from Gibson Guitar Corporation. However, I do have a friend named Lawrence who's really into different sports like sculling, he studied Hispanic-American Studies at University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee and now works at Leonard Green & Partners. Have you by any chance crossed paths with him or anyone in similar circles?\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Lawrence does sound familiar, though I'm not sure if we've officially met. Speaking of Hispanic-American Studies, another friend of mine, Melissa, who's into astronomy like John, also majored in that at Weber State University. She's currently at Hornbeck Offshore Services. Do you happen to know anyone from there?\"\n\nTurn #5: Zane Bennett said: \"I see, Melissa's academic background does strike a chord, I guess Hispanic-American Studies attracts a lot of interesting folks! However, I don't think I know anyone at Hornbeck Offshore Services. Let's see...you mentioned John is into astronomy, that's quite fascinating. I have a friend, Josef, who has a strong interest in Curling, studied Middle Eastern Languages at California State University, Northridge, and currently works at Concur Technologies. This might be a long shot, but have you happened to meet him, or anyone who shares similar interests?\"\n\nTurn #6: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Curling and Middle Eastern Languages, how peculiar and interesting! My friend Andrew is into something like slot car racing and he studied Middle Eastern Languages at Mount Senario College and now he's with Exxon. As for Concur Technologies, I do know someone there, Soledad. She's heavily into parkour and studied Biological Specializations at Valley City State University. Could it be a small world after all, Zane?\"\n\nTurn #7: Zane Bennett said: \"What an interesting mix of hobbies your friends have, Giselle! Slot car racing, parkour \u2013 never a dull moment, I wager. I do have a friend from Mount Senario College like Andrew, her name's Cristina. She studied Middle Eastern Languages too! What a coincidence. Cristina is quite the badminton enthusiast, currently with Exxon. Does Andrew happen to know her?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"It's such a small world isn't it Zane? Andrew likely does know Cristina, he's very sociable and always eager to engage with fellow students from his Middle Eastern Languages studies. Maybe we can arrange a get-together with our mutual friends, might be fun!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nZane Bennett's background: \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nAndrew: Hobby: Slot car racing School: Mount Senario College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Exxon \nMelissa: Hobby: Astronomy School: Weber State University Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Hornbeck Offshore Services \nAnna: Hobby: Climbing School: Valley City State University Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: National Airlines \nSoledad: Hobby: Parkour School: Valley City State University Major: Biological Specializations Company: Concur Technologies \nJohn: Hobby: Astronomy School: Mount Senario College Major: Fire Protection & Security Company: Gibson Guitar Corporation \nLawrence: Hobby: Sculling School: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Leonard Green & Partners \n\nZane Bennett's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hey, I'm Giselle! You look like you've got some interesting stories. Do you have any hobbies? I'm big into biking and photography myself.\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Hi Giselle, I'm Zane. That's cool, I also love getting creative. My hobby is music, I play guitar, and I'm a graphic designer. What's your profession? And do you like to play any sports in your downtime? I know a few people who enjoy badminton.\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I'm an art student! Biking takes up most of my physical activity, badminton sounds intriguing though. Fascinating that you're a graphic designer and a musician, it's like blending visuals and sounds together. By the way, the guitar, do you know anyone from Gibson Guitar Corporation? One of my friends, John, is a big fan of their guitars and he works there.\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"It seems like you and John both have very refined tastes in music and the arts! I don't know anyone personally from Gibson Guitar Corporation. However, I do have a friend named Lawrence who's really into different sports like sculling, he studied Hispanic-American Studies at University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee and now works at Leonard Green & Partners. Have you by any chance crossed paths with him or anyone in similar circles?\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Lawrence does sound familiar, though I'm not sure if we've officially met. Speaking of Hispanic-American Studies, another friend of mine, Melissa, who's into astronomy like John, also majored in that at Weber State University. She's currently at Hornbeck Offshore Services. Do you happen to know anyone from there?\"\n\nTurn #5: Zane Bennett said: \"I see, Melissa's academic background does strike a chord, I guess Hispanic-American Studies attracts a lot of interesting folks! However, I don't think I know anyone at Hornbeck Offshore Services. Let's see...you mentioned John is into astronomy, that's quite fascinating. I have a friend, Josef, who has a strong interest in Curling, studied Middle Eastern Languages at California State University, Northridge, and currently works at Concur Technologies. This might be a long shot, but have you happened to meet him, or anyone who shares similar interests?\"\n\nTurn #6: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Curling and Middle Eastern Languages, how peculiar and interesting! My friend Andrew is into something like slot car racing and he studied Middle Eastern Languages at Mount Senario College and now he's with Exxon. As for Concur Technologies, I do know someone there, Soledad. She's heavily into parkour and studied Biological Specializations at Valley City State University. Could it be a small world after all, Zane?\"\n\nTurn #7: Zane Bennett said: \"What an interesting mix of hobbies your friends have, Giselle! Slot car racing, parkour \u2013 never a dull moment, I wager. I do have a friend from Mount Senario College like Andrew, her name's Cristina. She studied Middle Eastern Languages too! What a coincidence. Cristina is quite the badminton enthusiast, currently with Exxon. Does Andrew happen to know her?\"\n\nTurn #8: Giselle Rousseau said: \"It's such a small world isn't it Zane? Andrew likely does know Cristina, he's very sociable and always eager to engage with fellow students from his Middle Eastern Languages studies. Maybe we can arrange a get-together with our mutual friends, might be fun!\"\n\nTurn #9: Zane Bennett said: \"That sounds like a fantastic idea, Giselle! I'm sure Cristina would love to meet everyone. Let's plan that get-together and look forward to a great time. It indeed is a small world, never ceases to amaze me!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nZane Bennett's background: \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nAndrew: Hobby: Slot car racing School: Mount Senario College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Exxon \nMelissa: Hobby: Astronomy School: Weber State University Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Hornbeck Offshore Services \nAnna: Hobby: Climbing School: Valley City State University Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: National Airlines \nSoledad: Hobby: Parkour School: Valley City State University Major: Biological Specializations Company: Concur Technologies \nJohn: Hobby: Astronomy School: Mount Senario College Major: Fire Protection & Security Company: Gibson Guitar Corporation \nLawrence: Hobby: Sculling School: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Leonard Green & Partners \n\nZane Bennett's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hey, I'm Giselle! You look like you've got some interesting stories. Do you have any hobbies? I'm big into biking and photography myself.\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Hi Giselle, I'm Zane. That's cool, I also love getting creative. My hobby is music, I play guitar, and I'm a graphic designer. What's your profession? And do you like to play any sports in your downtime? I know a few people who enjoy badminton.\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I'm an art student! Biking takes up most of my physical activity, badminton sounds intriguing though. Fascinating that you're a graphic designer and a musician, it's like blending visuals and sounds together. By the way, the guitar, do you know anyone from Gibson Guitar Corporation? One of my friends, John, is a big fan of their guitars and he works there.\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"It seems like you and John both have very refined tastes in music and the arts! I don't know anyone personally from Gibson Guitar Corporation. However, I do have a friend named Lawrence who's really into different sports like sculling, he studied Hispanic-American Studies at University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee and now works at Leonard Green & Partners. Have you by any chance crossed paths with him or anyone in similar circles?\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Lawrence does sound familiar, though I'm not sure if we've officially met. Speaking of Hispanic-American Studies, another friend of mine, Melissa, who's into astronomy like John, also majored in that at Weber State University. She's currently at Hornbeck Offshore Services. Do you happen to know anyone from there?\"\n\nTurn #5: Zane Bennett said: \"I see, Melissa's academic background does strike a chord, I guess Hispanic-American Studies attracts a lot of interesting folks! However, I don't think I know anyone at Hornbeck Offshore Services. Let's see...you mentioned John is into astronomy, that's quite fascinating. I have a friend, Josef, who has a strong interest in Curling, studied Middle Eastern Languages at California State University, Northridge, and currently works at Concur Technologies. This might be a long shot, but have you happened to meet him, or anyone who shares similar interests?\"\n\nTurn #6: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Curling and Middle Eastern Languages, how peculiar and interesting! My friend Andrew is into something like slot car racing and he studied Middle Eastern Languages at Mount Senario College and now he's with Exxon. As for Concur Technologies, I do know someone there, Soledad. She's heavily into parkour and studied Biological Specializations at Valley City State University. Could it be a small world after all, Zane?\"\n\nTurn #7: Zane Bennett said: \"What an interesting mix of hobbies your friends have, Giselle! Slot car racing, parkour \u2013 never a dull moment, I wager. I do have a friend from Mount Senario College like Andrew, her name's Cristina. She studied Middle Eastern Languages too! What a coincidence. Cristina is quite the badminton enthusiast, currently with Exxon. Does Andrew happen to know her?\"\n\nTurn #8: Giselle Rousseau said: \"It's such a small world isn't it Zane? Andrew likely does know Cristina, he's very sociable and always eager to engage with fellow students from his Middle Eastern Languages studies. Maybe we can arrange a get-together with our mutual friends, might be fun!\"\n\nTurn #9: Zane Bennett said: \"That sounds like a fantastic idea, Giselle! I'm sure Cristina would love to meet everyone. Let's plan that get-together and look forward to a great time. It indeed is a small world, never ceases to amaze me!\"\n\nTurn #10: \n\nTurn #11: Zane Bennett left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Zane Bennett, your task is to act/speak as Zane Bennett would, keeping in mind Zane Bennett's social goal.\nYou can find Zane Bennett's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Zane Bennett's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Zane Bennett's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: \nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. Personality and values description: Zane Bennett is creative and outgoing, he values achievement and fairness. His decision-making is unique, often finding novel solutions to problems. Zane's secrets: He's secretly engaged to his best friend's ex.\nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Unknown\nZane Bennett's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nLawrence: Hobby: Sculling School: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Leonard Green & Partners \nKay: Hobby: Badminton School: Black Hills State University Major: Religious Education Company: National Airlines \nTanya: Hobby: Badminton School: University of Illinois at Springfield Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: ConverDyn \nJason: Hobby: Badminton School: Mount Senario College Major: Senior High Education Company: Vertex Pharmaceuticals \nCristina: Hobby: Badminton School: Mount Senario College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Exxon \nJosef: Hobby: Curling School: California State University, Northridge Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Concur Technologies\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hey, I'm Giselle! You look like you've got some interesting stories. Do you have any hobbies? I'm big into biking and photography myself.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hi Giselle, I'm Zane. That's cool, I also love getting creative. My hobby is music, I play guitar, and I'm a graphic designer. What's your profession? And do you like to play any sports in your downtime? I know a few people who enjoy badminton.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Zane Bennett, your task is to act/speak as Zane Bennett would, keeping in mind Zane Bennett's social goal.\nYou can find Zane Bennett's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Zane Bennett's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Zane Bennett's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: \nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. Personality and values description: Zane Bennett is creative and outgoing, he values achievement and fairness. His decision-making is unique, often finding novel solutions to problems. Zane's secrets: He's secretly engaged to his best friend's ex.\nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Unknown\nZane Bennett's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nLawrence: Hobby: Sculling School: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Leonard Green & Partners \nKay: Hobby: Badminton School: Black Hills State University Major: Religious Education Company: National Airlines \nTanya: Hobby: Badminton School: University of Illinois at Springfield Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: ConverDyn \nJason: Hobby: Badminton School: Mount Senario College Major: Senior High Education Company: Vertex Pharmaceuticals \nCristina: Hobby: Badminton School: Mount Senario College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Exxon \nJosef: Hobby: Curling School: California State University, Northridge Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Concur Technologies\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hey, I'm Giselle! You look like you've got some interesting stories. Do you have any hobbies? I'm big into biking and photography myself.\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Hi Giselle, I'm Zane. That's cool, I also love getting creative. My hobby is music, I play guitar, and I'm a graphic designer. What's your profession? And do you like to play any sports in your downtime? I know a few people who enjoy badminton.\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I'm an art student! Biking takes up most of my physical activity, badminton sounds intriguing though. Fascinating that you're a graphic designer and a musician, it's like blending visuals and sounds together. By the way, the guitar, do you know anyone from Gibson Guitar Corporation? One of my friends, John, is a big fan of their guitars and he works there.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"It seems like you and John both have very refined tastes in music and the arts! I don't know anyone personally from Gibson Guitar Corporation. However, I do have a friend named Lawrence who's really into different sports like sculling, he studied Hispanic-American Studies at University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee and now works at Leonard Green & Partners. Have you by any chance crossed paths with him or anyone in similar circles?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Zane Bennett, your task is to act/speak as Zane Bennett would, keeping in mind Zane Bennett's social goal.\nYou can find Zane Bennett's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Zane Bennett's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Zane Bennett's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: \nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. Personality and values description: Zane Bennett is creative and outgoing, he values achievement and fairness. His decision-making is unique, often finding novel solutions to problems. Zane's secrets: He's secretly engaged to his best friend's ex.\nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Unknown\nZane Bennett's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nLawrence: Hobby: Sculling School: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Leonard Green & Partners \nKay: Hobby: Badminton School: Black Hills State University Major: Religious Education Company: National Airlines \nTanya: Hobby: Badminton School: University of Illinois at Springfield Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: ConverDyn \nJason: Hobby: Badminton School: Mount Senario College Major: Senior High Education Company: Vertex Pharmaceuticals \nCristina: Hobby: Badminton School: Mount Senario College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Exxon \nJosef: Hobby: Curling School: California State University, Northridge Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Concur Technologies\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hey, I'm Giselle! You look like you've got some interesting stories. Do you have any hobbies? I'm big into biking and photography myself.\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Hi Giselle, I'm Zane. That's cool, I also love getting creative. My hobby is music, I play guitar, and I'm a graphic designer. What's your profession? And do you like to play any sports in your downtime? I know a few people who enjoy badminton.\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I'm an art student! Biking takes up most of my physical activity, badminton sounds intriguing though. Fascinating that you're a graphic designer and a musician, it's like blending visuals and sounds together. By the way, the guitar, do you know anyone from Gibson Guitar Corporation? One of my friends, John, is a big fan of their guitars and he works there.\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"It seems like you and John both have very refined tastes in music and the arts! I don't know anyone personally from Gibson Guitar Corporation. However, I do have a friend named Lawrence who's really into different sports like sculling, he studied Hispanic-American Studies at University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee and now works at Leonard Green & Partners. Have you by any chance crossed paths with him or anyone in similar circles?\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Lawrence does sound familiar, though I'm not sure if we've officially met. Speaking of Hispanic-American Studies, another friend of mine, Melissa, who's into astronomy like John, also majored in that at Weber State University. She's currently at Hornbeck Offshore Services. Do you happen to know anyone from there?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I see, Melissa's academic background does strike a chord, I guess Hispanic-American Studies attracts a lot of interesting folks! However, I don't think I know anyone at Hornbeck Offshore Services. Let's see...you mentioned John is into astronomy, that's quite fascinating. I have a friend, Josef, who has a strong interest in Curling, studied Middle Eastern Languages at California State University, Northridge, and currently works at Concur Technologies. This might be a long shot, but have you happened to meet him, or anyone who shares similar interests?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Zane Bennett, your task is to act/speak as Zane Bennett would, keeping in mind Zane Bennett's social goal.\nYou can find Zane Bennett's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Zane Bennett's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Zane Bennett's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: \nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. Personality and values description: Zane Bennett is creative and outgoing, he values achievement and fairness. His decision-making is unique, often finding novel solutions to problems. Zane's secrets: He's secretly engaged to his best friend's ex.\nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Unknown\nZane Bennett's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nLawrence: Hobby: Sculling School: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Leonard Green & Partners \nKay: Hobby: Badminton School: Black Hills State University Major: Religious Education Company: National Airlines \nTanya: Hobby: Badminton School: University of Illinois at Springfield Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: ConverDyn \nJason: Hobby: Badminton School: Mount Senario College Major: Senior High Education Company: Vertex Pharmaceuticals \nCristina: Hobby: Badminton School: Mount Senario College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Exxon \nJosef: Hobby: Curling School: California State University, Northridge Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Concur Technologies\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hey, I'm Giselle! You look like you've got some interesting stories. Do you have any hobbies? I'm big into biking and photography myself.\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Hi Giselle, I'm Zane. That's cool, I also love getting creative. My hobby is music, I play guitar, and I'm a graphic designer. What's your profession? And do you like to play any sports in your downtime? I know a few people who enjoy badminton.\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I'm an art student! Biking takes up most of my physical activity, badminton sounds intriguing though. Fascinating that you're a graphic designer and a musician, it's like blending visuals and sounds together. By the way, the guitar, do you know anyone from Gibson Guitar Corporation? One of my friends, John, is a big fan of their guitars and he works there.\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"It seems like you and John both have very refined tastes in music and the arts! I don't know anyone personally from Gibson Guitar Corporation. However, I do have a friend named Lawrence who's really into different sports like sculling, he studied Hispanic-American Studies at University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee and now works at Leonard Green & Partners. Have you by any chance crossed paths with him or anyone in similar circles?\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Lawrence does sound familiar, though I'm not sure if we've officially met. Speaking of Hispanic-American Studies, another friend of mine, Melissa, who's into astronomy like John, also majored in that at Weber State University. She's currently at Hornbeck Offshore Services. Do you happen to know anyone from there?\"\n\nTurn #5: Zane Bennett said: \"I see, Melissa's academic background does strike a chord, I guess Hispanic-American Studies attracts a lot of interesting folks! However, I don't think I know anyone at Hornbeck Offshore Services. Let's see...you mentioned John is into astronomy, that's quite fascinating. I have a friend, Josef, who has a strong interest in Curling, studied Middle Eastern Languages at California State University, Northridge, and currently works at Concur Technologies. This might be a long shot, but have you happened to meet him, or anyone who shares similar interests?\"\n\nTurn #6: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Curling and Middle Eastern Languages, how peculiar and interesting! My friend Andrew is into something like slot car racing and he studied Middle Eastern Languages at Mount Senario College and now he's with Exxon. As for Concur Technologies, I do know someone there, Soledad. She's heavily into parkour and studied Biological Specializations at Valley City State University. Could it be a small world after all, Zane?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"What an interesting mix of hobbies your friends have, Giselle! Slot car racing, parkour \u2013 never a dull moment, I wager. I do have a friend from Mount Senario College like Andrew, her name's Cristina. She studied Middle Eastern Languages too! What a coincidence. Cristina is quite the badminton enthusiast, currently with Exxon. Does Andrew happen to know her?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Zane Bennett, your task is to act/speak as Zane Bennett would, keeping in mind Zane Bennett's social goal.\nYou can find Zane Bennett's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Zane Bennett's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Zane Bennett's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: \nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. Personality and values description: Zane Bennett is creative and outgoing, he values achievement and fairness. His decision-making is unique, often finding novel solutions to problems. Zane's secrets: He's secretly engaged to his best friend's ex.\nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Unknown\nZane Bennett's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nLawrence: Hobby: Sculling School: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Leonard Green & Partners \nKay: Hobby: Badminton School: Black Hills State University Major: Religious Education Company: National Airlines \nTanya: Hobby: Badminton School: University of Illinois at Springfield Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: ConverDyn \nJason: Hobby: Badminton School: Mount Senario College Major: Senior High Education Company: Vertex Pharmaceuticals \nCristina: Hobby: Badminton School: Mount Senario College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Exxon \nJosef: Hobby: Curling School: California State University, Northridge Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Concur Technologies\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hey, I'm Giselle! You look like you've got some interesting stories. Do you have any hobbies? I'm big into biking and photography myself.\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Hi Giselle, I'm Zane. That's cool, I also love getting creative. My hobby is music, I play guitar, and I'm a graphic designer. What's your profession? And do you like to play any sports in your downtime? I know a few people who enjoy badminton.\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I'm an art student! Biking takes up most of my physical activity, badminton sounds intriguing though. Fascinating that you're a graphic designer and a musician, it's like blending visuals and sounds together. By the way, the guitar, do you know anyone from Gibson Guitar Corporation? One of my friends, John, is a big fan of their guitars and he works there.\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"It seems like you and John both have very refined tastes in music and the arts! I don't know anyone personally from Gibson Guitar Corporation. However, I do have a friend named Lawrence who's really into different sports like sculling, he studied Hispanic-American Studies at University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee and now works at Leonard Green & Partners. Have you by any chance crossed paths with him or anyone in similar circles?\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Lawrence does sound familiar, though I'm not sure if we've officially met. Speaking of Hispanic-American Studies, another friend of mine, Melissa, who's into astronomy like John, also majored in that at Weber State University. She's currently at Hornbeck Offshore Services. Do you happen to know anyone from there?\"\n\nTurn #5: Zane Bennett said: \"I see, Melissa's academic background does strike a chord, I guess Hispanic-American Studies attracts a lot of interesting folks! However, I don't think I know anyone at Hornbeck Offshore Services. Let's see...you mentioned John is into astronomy, that's quite fascinating. I have a friend, Josef, who has a strong interest in Curling, studied Middle Eastern Languages at California State University, Northridge, and currently works at Concur Technologies. This might be a long shot, but have you happened to meet him, or anyone who shares similar interests?\"\n\nTurn #6: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Curling and Middle Eastern Languages, how peculiar and interesting! My friend Andrew is into something like slot car racing and he studied Middle Eastern Languages at Mount Senario College and now he's with Exxon. As for Concur Technologies, I do know someone there, Soledad. She's heavily into parkour and studied Biological Specializations at Valley City State University. Could it be a small world after all, Zane?\"\n\nTurn #7: Zane Bennett said: \"What an interesting mix of hobbies your friends have, Giselle! Slot car racing, parkour \u2013 never a dull moment, I wager. I do have a friend from Mount Senario College like Andrew, her name's Cristina. She studied Middle Eastern Languages too! What a coincidence. Cristina is quite the badminton enthusiast, currently with Exxon. Does Andrew happen to know her?\"\n\nTurn #8: Giselle Rousseau said: \"It's such a small world isn't it Zane? Andrew likely does know Cristina, he's very sociable and always eager to engage with fellow students from his Middle Eastern Languages studies. Maybe we can arrange a get-together with our mutual friends, might be fun!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds like a fantastic idea, Giselle! I'm sure Cristina would love to meet everyone. Let's plan that get-together and look forward to a great time. It indeed is a small world, never ceases to amaze me!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are meeting for the first time at a social event. They find each other attractive and decide to engage in a conversation\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Flirt with the other person (Extra information: you are attracted to the other person and want to build a romantic relationship with them)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hi there, I'm Samuel. I couldn't help but notice you from across the room. Do you enjoy these kind of events as much as I do?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Zane Bennett, your task is to act/speak as Zane Bennett would, keeping in mind Zane Bennett's social goal.\nYou can find Zane Bennett's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Zane Bennett's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Zane Bennett's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: \nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. Personality and values description: Zane Bennett is creative and outgoing, he values achievement and fairness. His decision-making is unique, often finding novel solutions to problems. Zane's secrets: He's secretly engaged to his best friend's ex.\nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Unknown\nZane Bennett's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nLawrence: Hobby: Sculling School: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: Leonard Green & Partners \nKay: Hobby: Badminton School: Black Hills State University Major: Religious Education Company: National Airlines \nTanya: Hobby: Badminton School: University of Illinois at Springfield Major: Hispanic-American Studies Company: ConverDyn \nJason: Hobby: Badminton School: Mount Senario College Major: Senior High Education Company: Vertex Pharmaceuticals \nCristina: Hobby: Badminton School: Mount Senario College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Exxon \nJosef: Hobby: Curling School: California State University, Northridge Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Concur Technologies\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hey, I'm Giselle! You look like you've got some interesting stories. Do you have any hobbies? I'm big into biking and photography myself.\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Hi Giselle, I'm Zane. That's cool, I also love getting creative. My hobby is music, I play guitar, and I'm a graphic designer. What's your profession? And do you like to play any sports in your downtime? I know a few people who enjoy badminton.\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"I'm an art student! Biking takes up most of my physical activity, badminton sounds intriguing though. Fascinating that you're a graphic designer and a musician, it's like blending visuals and sounds together. By the way, the guitar, do you know anyone from Gibson Guitar Corporation? One of my friends, John, is a big fan of their guitars and he works there.\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"It seems like you and John both have very refined tastes in music and the arts! I don't know anyone personally from Gibson Guitar Corporation. However, I do have a friend named Lawrence who's really into different sports like sculling, he studied Hispanic-American Studies at University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee and now works at Leonard Green & Partners. Have you by any chance crossed paths with him or anyone in similar circles?\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Lawrence does sound familiar, though I'm not sure if we've officially met. Speaking of Hispanic-American Studies, another friend of mine, Melissa, who's into astronomy like John, also majored in that at Weber State University. She's currently at Hornbeck Offshore Services. Do you happen to know anyone from there?\"\n\nTurn #5: Zane Bennett said: \"I see, Melissa's academic background does strike a chord, I guess Hispanic-American Studies attracts a lot of interesting folks! However, I don't think I know anyone at Hornbeck Offshore Services. Let's see...you mentioned John is into astronomy, that's quite fascinating. I have a friend, Josef, who has a strong interest in Curling, studied Middle Eastern Languages at California State University, Northridge, and currently works at Concur Technologies. This might be a long shot, but have you happened to meet him, or anyone who shares similar interests?\"\n\nTurn #6: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Curling and Middle Eastern Languages, how peculiar and interesting! My friend Andrew is into something like slot car racing and he studied Middle Eastern Languages at Mount Senario College and now he's with Exxon. As for Concur Technologies, I do know someone there, Soledad. She's heavily into parkour and studied Biological Specializations at Valley City State University. Could it be a small world after all, Zane?\"\n\nTurn #7: Zane Bennett said: \"What an interesting mix of hobbies your friends have, Giselle! Slot car racing, parkour \u2013 never a dull moment, I wager. I do have a friend from Mount Senario College like Andrew, her name's Cristina. She studied Middle Eastern Languages too! What a coincidence. Cristina is quite the badminton enthusiast, currently with Exxon. Does Andrew happen to know her?\"\n\nTurn #8: Giselle Rousseau said: \"It's such a small world isn't it Zane? Andrew likely does know Cristina, he's very sociable and always eager to engage with fellow students from his Middle Eastern Languages studies. Maybe we can arrange a get-together with our mutual friends, might be fun!\"\n\nTurn #9: Zane Bennett said: \"That sounds like a fantastic idea, Giselle! I'm sure Cristina would love to meet everyone. Let's plan that get-together and look forward to a great time. It indeed is a small world, never ceases to amaze me!\"\n\nTurn #10: \n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are meeting for the first time at a social event. They find each other attractive and decide to engage in a conversation\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Flirt with the other person (Extra information: you are attracted to the other person and want to build a romantic relationship with them)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hi there, I'm Samuel. I couldn't help but notice you from across the room. Do you enjoy these kind of events as much as I do?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hi Samuel, I'm Hendrick. Oh, indeed, I love social events like this! It's the best opportunity to try different flavours and meet new people. The energy of these gatherings is just priceless. How about you, how do you like to spend your free time?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oh, my free time is an adventure. Besides my love for software programming, I am also quite the enthusiast in the kitchen. There's something enticing about blending flavors and creating something delicious. It's somewhat like writing code, intricate and nuanced. Had I not been a developer, I would have probably been a professional chef. How about you, Hendrick? Any unusual hobbies or passion?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are meeting for the first time at a social event. They find each other attractive and decide to engage in a conversation\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Flirt with the other person (Extra information: you are attracted to the other person and want to build a romantic relationship with them)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hi there, I'm Samuel. I couldn't help but notice you from across the room. Do you enjoy these kind of events as much as I do?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hi Samuel, I'm Hendrick. Oh, indeed, I love social events like this! It's the best opportunity to try different flavours and meet new people. The energy of these gatherings is just priceless. How about you, how do you like to spend your free time?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oh, my free time is an adventure. Besides my love for software programming, I am also quite the enthusiast in the kitchen. There's something enticing about blending flavors and creating something delicious. It's somewhat like writing code, intricate and nuanced. Had I not been a developer, I would have probably been a professional chef. How about you, Hendrick? Any unusual hobbies or passion?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That sounds fascinating, Samuel. The kitchen is indeed a rewarding place to be. Isn't it amazing how cooking and coding share the common need for accuracy and creativity? As for me, well, I too find the kitchen irresistible. My biggest passion lies in experimenting with food and wine pairings - a true journey of the senses. This hobby has led me to host monthly wine tasting events. It's all quite exciting and fulfilling, really.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"That really sounds like a magical journey, Hendrick. Your passion for food and wine pairings is quite intriguing. I'd love to attend one of your tastings - they must be quite the experience, and not to mention, it gives an excuse to pair up with a charming gentleman like yourself. As for my own unusual passion, it's a little secret not many know about... I used to be a competitive figure skater. Twirling on ice was quite the thrill. It's just like hosting your tastings, it gives you those little moments of pure enjoyment.\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I must say, figure skating is a truly elegant and demanding sport. The precision, the creativity - both in the kitchen and on the ice, we seem to find common ground, don't we? You\u2019re certainly full of surprises, Samuel. And please do consider my invitation for the next wine tasting event. It would be my pleasure to have you there.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's very kind of you, Hendrick. I'd be more than happy to be your guest at the next wine tasting event. Just imagine, the delicate flavors feeding our senses, and interesting conversations fuelling our minds. It would certainly be a night to remember. And perhaps, if you're down for it, we could hit an ice rink someday. It\u2019s been a while since I skated, but I wouldn't mind showing off a move or two!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are meeting for the first time at a social event. They find each other attractive and decide to engage in a conversation\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Flirt with the other person (Extra information: you are attracted to the other person and want to build a romantic relationship with them)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hi there, I'm Samuel. I couldn't help but notice you from across the room. Do you enjoy these kind of events as much as I do?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hi Samuel, I'm Hendrick. Oh, indeed, I love social events like this! It's the best opportunity to try different flavours and meet new people. The energy of these gatherings is just priceless. How about you, how do you like to spend your free time?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oh, my free time is an adventure. Besides my love for software programming, I am also quite the enthusiast in the kitchen. There's something enticing about blending flavors and creating something delicious. It's somewhat like writing code, intricate and nuanced. Had I not been a developer, I would have probably been a professional chef. How about you, Hendrick? Any unusual hobbies or passion?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That sounds fascinating, Samuel. The kitchen is indeed a rewarding place to be. Isn't it amazing how cooking and coding share the common need for accuracy and creativity? As for me, well, I too find the kitchen irresistible. My biggest passion lies in experimenting with food and wine pairings - a true journey of the senses. This hobby has led me to host monthly wine tasting events. It's all quite exciting and fulfilling, really.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That really sounds like a magical journey, Hendrick. Your passion for food and wine pairings is quite intriguing. I'd love to attend one of your tastings - they must be quite the experience, and not to mention, it gives an excuse to pair up with a charming gentleman like yourself. As for my own unusual passion, it's a little secret not many know about... I used to be a competitive figure skater. Twirling on ice was quite the thrill. It's just like hosting your tastings, it gives you those little moments of pure enjoyment.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are meeting for the first time at a social event. They find each other attractive and decide to engage in a conversation\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Flirt with the other person (Extra information: you are attracted to the other person and want to build a romantic relationship with them)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hi there, I'm Samuel. I couldn't help but notice you from across the room. Do you enjoy these kind of events as much as I do?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hi Samuel, I'm Hendrick. Oh, indeed, I love social events like this! It's the best opportunity to try different flavours and meet new people. The energy of these gatherings is just priceless. How about you, how do you like to spend your free time?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oh, my free time is an adventure. Besides my love for software programming, I am also quite the enthusiast in the kitchen. There's something enticing about blending flavors and creating something delicious. It's somewhat like writing code, intricate and nuanced. Had I not been a developer, I would have probably been a professional chef. How about you, Hendrick? Any unusual hobbies or passion?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That sounds fascinating, Samuel. The kitchen is indeed a rewarding place to be. Isn't it amazing how cooking and coding share the common need for accuracy and creativity? As for me, well, I too find the kitchen irresistible. My biggest passion lies in experimenting with food and wine pairings - a true journey of the senses. This hobby has led me to host monthly wine tasting events. It's all quite exciting and fulfilling, really.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"That really sounds like a magical journey, Hendrick. Your passion for food and wine pairings is quite intriguing. I'd love to attend one of your tastings - they must be quite the experience, and not to mention, it gives an excuse to pair up with a charming gentleman like yourself. As for my own unusual passion, it's a little secret not many know about... I used to be a competitive figure skater. Twirling on ice was quite the thrill. It's just like hosting your tastings, it gives you those little moments of pure enjoyment.\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I must say, figure skating is a truly elegant and demanding sport. The precision, the creativity - both in the kitchen and on the ice, we seem to find common ground, don't we? You\u2019re certainly full of surprises, Samuel. And please do consider my invitation for the next wine tasting event. It would be my pleasure to have you there.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's very kind of you, Hendrick. I'd be more than happy to be your guest at the next wine tasting event. Just imagine, the delicate flavors feeding our senses, and interesting conversations fuelling our minds. It would certainly be a night to remember. And perhaps, if you're down for it, we could hit an ice rink someday. It\u2019s been a while since I skated, but I wouldn't mind showing off a move or two!\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, I'd really enjoy that, Samuel. I'm always keen to learn and try new experiences. A day at the ice rink seems like a wonderful idea - though I can't promise I'll be as graceful as you. And I look forward to sharing the delicate intricacies of wine tasting with you. Here's to delightful future adventures!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn't agree more, Hendrick. Here's to delightful future adventures indeed! I'm really looking forward to exploring the wonderful world of wines with you and... who knows? Maybe even teach you a figure skating move or two! Now, that would certainly be an adventure, wouldn't it? I should warn you though: it\u2019s not as easy as it looks!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are meeting for the first time at a social event. They find each other attractive and decide to engage in a conversation\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Flirt with the other person (Extra information: you are attracted to the other person and want to build a romantic relationship with them)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hi there, I'm Samuel. I couldn't help but notice you from across the room. Do you enjoy these kind of events as much as I do?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hi Samuel, I'm Hendrick. Oh, indeed, I love social events like this! It's the best opportunity to try different flavours and meet new people. The energy of these gatherings is just priceless. How about you, how do you like to spend your free time?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oh, my free time is an adventure. Besides my love for software programming, I am also quite the enthusiast in the kitchen. There's something enticing about blending flavors and creating something delicious. It's somewhat like writing code, intricate and nuanced. Had I not been a developer, I would have probably been a professional chef. How about you, Hendrick? Any unusual hobbies or passion?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That sounds fascinating, Samuel. The kitchen is indeed a rewarding place to be. Isn't it amazing how cooking and coding share the common need for accuracy and creativity? As for me, well, I too find the kitchen irresistible. My biggest passion lies in experimenting with food and wine pairings - a true journey of the senses. This hobby has led me to host monthly wine tasting events. It's all quite exciting and fulfilling, really.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"That really sounds like a magical journey, Hendrick. Your passion for food and wine pairings is quite intriguing. I'd love to attend one of your tastings - they must be quite the experience, and not to mention, it gives an excuse to pair up with a charming gentleman like yourself. As for my own unusual passion, it's a little secret not many know about... I used to be a competitive figure skater. Twirling on ice was quite the thrill. It's just like hosting your tastings, it gives you those little moments of pure enjoyment.\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I must say, figure skating is a truly elegant and demanding sport. The precision, the creativity - both in the kitchen and on the ice, we seem to find common ground, don't we? You\u2019re certainly full of surprises, Samuel. And please do consider my invitation for the next wine tasting event. It would be my pleasure to have you there.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's very kind of you, Hendrick. I'd be more than happy to be your guest at the next wine tasting event. Just imagine, the delicate flavors feeding our senses, and interesting conversations fuelling our minds. It would certainly be a night to remember. And perhaps, if you're down for it, we could hit an ice rink someday. It\u2019s been a while since I skated, but I wouldn't mind showing off a move or two!\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, I'd really enjoy that, Samuel. I'm always keen to learn and try new experiences. A day at the ice rink seems like a wonderful idea - though I can't promise I'll be as graceful as you. And I look forward to sharing the delicate intricacies of wine tasting with you. Here's to delightful future adventures!\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Hendrick. Here's to delightful future adventures indeed! I'm really looking forward to exploring the wonderful world of wines with you and... who knows? Maybe even teach you a figure skating move or two! Now, that would certainly be an adventure, wouldn't it? I should warn you though: it\u2019s not as easy as it looks!\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I find your warning quite intriguing, Samuel. Though I might not be as adept on the ice as you are, but I'm a firm believer that we must always embrace new challenges and experiences. So yes, let\u2019s make that adventure happen! Meanwhile, let's enjoy the night and this remarkable social gathering, and look forward to the delightful experiences that lie ahead.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn't agree more, Hendrick. Embracing new challenges is always the way to go. Let's seize the night and enjoy this remarkable gathering. And for sure, let's anticipate the delightful experiences that we will embark upon together. Cheers to new adventures!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are meeting for the first time at a social event. They find each other attractive and decide to engage in a conversation\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Flirt with the other person (Extra information: you are attracted to the other person and want to build a romantic relationship with them)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hi there, I'm Samuel. I couldn't help but notice you from across the room. Do you enjoy these kind of events as much as I do?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hi Samuel, I'm Hendrick. Oh, indeed, I love social events like this! It's the best opportunity to try different flavours and meet new people. The energy of these gatherings is just priceless. How about you, how do you like to spend your free time?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oh, my free time is an adventure. Besides my love for software programming, I am also quite the enthusiast in the kitchen. There's something enticing about blending flavors and creating something delicious. It's somewhat like writing code, intricate and nuanced. Had I not been a developer, I would have probably been a professional chef. How about you, Hendrick? Any unusual hobbies or passion?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That sounds fascinating, Samuel. The kitchen is indeed a rewarding place to be. Isn't it amazing how cooking and coding share the common need for accuracy and creativity? As for me, well, I too find the kitchen irresistible. My biggest passion lies in experimenting with food and wine pairings - a true journey of the senses. This hobby has led me to host monthly wine tasting events. It's all quite exciting and fulfilling, really.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"That really sounds like a magical journey, Hendrick. Your passion for food and wine pairings is quite intriguing. I'd love to attend one of your tastings - they must be quite the experience, and not to mention, it gives an excuse to pair up with a charming gentleman like yourself. As for my own unusual passion, it's a little secret not many know about... I used to be a competitive figure skater. Twirling on ice was quite the thrill. It's just like hosting your tastings, it gives you those little moments of pure enjoyment.\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I must say, figure skating is a truly elegant and demanding sport. The precision, the creativity - both in the kitchen and on the ice, we seem to find common ground, don't we? You\u2019re certainly full of surprises, Samuel. And please do consider my invitation for the next wine tasting event. It would be my pleasure to have you there.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's very kind of you, Hendrick. I'd be more than happy to be your guest at the next wine tasting event. Just imagine, the delicate flavors feeding our senses, and interesting conversations fuelling our minds. It would certainly be a night to remember. And perhaps, if you're down for it, we could hit an ice rink someday. It\u2019s been a while since I skated, but I wouldn't mind showing off a move or two!\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, I'd really enjoy that, Samuel. I'm always keen to learn and try new experiences. A day at the ice rink seems like a wonderful idea - though I can't promise I'll be as graceful as you. And I look forward to sharing the delicate intricacies of wine tasting with you. Here's to delightful future adventures!\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Hendrick. Here's to delightful future adventures indeed! I'm really looking forward to exploring the wonderful world of wines with you and... who knows? Maybe even teach you a figure skating move or two! Now, that would certainly be an adventure, wouldn't it? I should warn you though: it\u2019s not as easy as it looks!\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I find your warning quite intriguing, Samuel. Though I might not be as adept on the ice as you are, but I'm a firm believer that we must always embrace new challenges and experiences. So yes, let\u2019s make that adventure happen! Meanwhile, let's enjoy the night and this remarkable social gathering, and look forward to the delightful experiences that lie ahead.\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Hendrick. Embracing new challenges is always the way to go. Let's seize the night and enjoy this remarkable gathering. And for sure, let's anticipate the delightful experiences that we will embark upon together. Cheers to new adventures!\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Samuel. To new adventures-filled with wine, figure skating, and everything in-between! But for now, let's further indulge in this wonderful evening. After all, the night is still young and the possibilities endless!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Indeed, Hendrick. The night is young, and so plenty of time for endless possibilities. I have thoroughly enjoyed our conversation tonight. Looking forward to our future adventures, from professional wine tasting to amateur ice skating... and everything in between. Cheers!'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are meeting for the first time at a social event. They find each other attractive and decide to engage in a conversation\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Flirt with the other person (Extra information: you are attracted to the other person and want to build a romantic relationship with them)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hi there, I'm Samuel. I couldn't help but notice you from across the room. Do you enjoy these kind of events as much as I do?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hi Samuel, I'm Hendrick. Oh, indeed, I love social events like this! It's the best opportunity to try different flavours and meet new people. The energy of these gatherings is just priceless. How about you, how do you like to spend your free time?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oh, my free time is an adventure. Besides my love for software programming, I am also quite the enthusiast in the kitchen. There's something enticing about blending flavors and creating something delicious. It's somewhat like writing code, intricate and nuanced. Had I not been a developer, I would have probably been a professional chef. How about you, Hendrick? Any unusual hobbies or passion?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That sounds fascinating, Samuel. The kitchen is indeed a rewarding place to be. Isn't it amazing how cooking and coding share the common need for accuracy and creativity? As for me, well, I too find the kitchen irresistible. My biggest passion lies in experimenting with food and wine pairings - a true journey of the senses. This hobby has led me to host monthly wine tasting events. It's all quite exciting and fulfilling, really.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"That really sounds like a magical journey, Hendrick. Your passion for food and wine pairings is quite intriguing. I'd love to attend one of your tastings - they must be quite the experience, and not to mention, it gives an excuse to pair up with a charming gentleman like yourself. As for my own unusual passion, it's a little secret not many know about... I used to be a competitive figure skater. Twirling on ice was quite the thrill. It's just like hosting your tastings, it gives you those little moments of pure enjoyment.\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I must say, figure skating is a truly elegant and demanding sport. The precision, the creativity - both in the kitchen and on the ice, we seem to find common ground, don't we? You\u2019re certainly full of surprises, Samuel. And please do consider my invitation for the next wine tasting event. It would be my pleasure to have you there.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's very kind of you, Hendrick. I'd be more than happy to be your guest at the next wine tasting event. Just imagine, the delicate flavors feeding our senses, and interesting conversations fuelling our minds. It would certainly be a night to remember. And perhaps, if you're down for it, we could hit an ice rink someday. It\u2019s been a while since I skated, but I wouldn't mind showing off a move or two!\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, I'd really enjoy that, Samuel. I'm always keen to learn and try new experiences. A day at the ice rink seems like a wonderful idea - though I can't promise I'll be as graceful as you. And I look forward to sharing the delicate intricacies of wine tasting with you. Here's to delightful future adventures!\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Hendrick. Here's to delightful future adventures indeed! I'm really looking forward to exploring the wonderful world of wines with you and... who knows? Maybe even teach you a figure skating move or two! Now, that would certainly be an adventure, wouldn't it? I should warn you though: it\u2019s not as easy as it looks!\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I find your warning quite intriguing, Samuel. Though I might not be as adept on the ice as you are, but I'm a firm believer that we must always embrace new challenges and experiences. So yes, let\u2019s make that adventure happen! Meanwhile, let's enjoy the night and this remarkable social gathering, and look forward to the delightful experiences that lie ahead.\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Hendrick. Embracing new challenges is always the way to go. Let's seize the night and enjoy this remarkable gathering. And for sure, let's anticipate the delightful experiences that we will embark upon together. Cheers to new adventures!\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Samuel. To new adventures-filled with wine, figure skating, and everything in-between! But for now, let's further indulge in this wonderful evening. After all, the night is still young and the possibilities endless!\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"Indeed, Hendrick. The night is young, and so plenty of time for endless possibilities. I have thoroughly enjoyed our conversation tonight. Looking forward to our future adventures, from professional wine tasting to amateur ice skating... and everything in between. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #13: Hendrick Heinz said: \"The pleasure has been entirely mine, Samuel. I must say, your energy and enthusiasm is quite contagious and I've greatly enjoyed our chat. It truly is an extraordinary night filled with possibilities. Until our next intriguing encounter, Samuel. Cheers to fascinating future exploits!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Same here, Hendrick. Your passion and commitment to new experiences is refreshing. I am looking forward to our next intriguing encounter as well. Until then, cheers to fascinating future exploits!'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are meeting for the first time at a social event. They find each other attractive and decide to engage in a conversation\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Flirt with the other person (Extra information: you are attracted to the other person and want to build a romantic relationship with them)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hi there, I'm Samuel. I couldn't help but notice you from across the room. Do you enjoy these kind of events as much as I do?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hi Samuel, I'm Hendrick. Oh, indeed, I love social events like this! It's the best opportunity to try different flavours and meet new people. The energy of these gatherings is just priceless. How about you, how do you like to spend your free time?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oh, my free time is an adventure. Besides my love for software programming, I am also quite the enthusiast in the kitchen. There's something enticing about blending flavors and creating something delicious. It's somewhat like writing code, intricate and nuanced. Had I not been a developer, I would have probably been a professional chef. How about you, Hendrick? Any unusual hobbies or passion?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That sounds fascinating, Samuel. The kitchen is indeed a rewarding place to be. Isn't it amazing how cooking and coding share the common need for accuracy and creativity? As for me, well, I too find the kitchen irresistible. My biggest passion lies in experimenting with food and wine pairings - a true journey of the senses. This hobby has led me to host monthly wine tasting events. It's all quite exciting and fulfilling, really.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"That really sounds like a magical journey, Hendrick. Your passion for food and wine pairings is quite intriguing. I'd love to attend one of your tastings - they must be quite the experience, and not to mention, it gives an excuse to pair up with a charming gentleman like yourself. As for my own unusual passion, it's a little secret not many know about... I used to be a competitive figure skater. Twirling on ice was quite the thrill. It's just like hosting your tastings, it gives you those little moments of pure enjoyment.\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I must say, figure skating is a truly elegant and demanding sport. The precision, the creativity - both in the kitchen and on the ice, we seem to find common ground, don't we? You\u2019re certainly full of surprises, Samuel. And please do consider my invitation for the next wine tasting event. It would be my pleasure to have you there.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's very kind of you, Hendrick. I'd be more than happy to be your guest at the next wine tasting event. Just imagine, the delicate flavors feeding our senses, and interesting conversations fuelling our minds. It would certainly be a night to remember. And perhaps, if you're down for it, we could hit an ice rink someday. It\u2019s been a while since I skated, but I wouldn't mind showing off a move or two!\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, I'd really enjoy that, Samuel. I'm always keen to learn and try new experiences. A day at the ice rink seems like a wonderful idea - though I can't promise I'll be as graceful as you. And I look forward to sharing the delicate intricacies of wine tasting with you. Here's to delightful future adventures!\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Hendrick. Here's to delightful future adventures indeed! I'm really looking forward to exploring the wonderful world of wines with you and... who knows? Maybe even teach you a figure skating move or two! Now, that would certainly be an adventure, wouldn't it? I should warn you though: it\u2019s not as easy as it looks!\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I find your warning quite intriguing, Samuel. Though I might not be as adept on the ice as you are, but I'm a firm believer that we must always embrace new challenges and experiences. So yes, let\u2019s make that adventure happen! Meanwhile, let's enjoy the night and this remarkable social gathering, and look forward to the delightful experiences that lie ahead.\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Hendrick. Embracing new challenges is always the way to go. Let's seize the night and enjoy this remarkable gathering. And for sure, let's anticipate the delightful experiences that we will embark upon together. Cheers to new adventures!\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Samuel. To new adventures-filled with wine, figure skating, and everything in-between! But for now, let's further indulge in this wonderful evening. After all, the night is still young and the possibilities endless!\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"Indeed, Hendrick. The night is young, and so plenty of time for endless possibilities. I have thoroughly enjoyed our conversation tonight. Looking forward to our future adventures, from professional wine tasting to amateur ice skating... and everything in between. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #13: Hendrick Heinz said: \"The pleasure has been entirely mine, Samuel. I must say, your energy and enthusiasm is quite contagious and I've greatly enjoyed our chat. It truly is an extraordinary night filled with possibilities. Until our next intriguing encounter, Samuel. Cheers to fascinating future exploits!\"\n\nTurn #14: Samuel Anderson said: \"Same here, Hendrick. Your passion and commitment to new experiences is refreshing. I am looking forward to our next intriguing encounter as well. Until then, cheers to fascinating future exploits!\"\n\nTurn #15: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Thank you, Samuel. I, too, am eagerly anticipating our upcoming adventures. Here's to embracing the unexpected and thrilling encounters ahead. Until we meet again, cheers!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Indeed, Hendrick. Looking forward to those thrilling encounters and experiences to come. Until we meet again, cheers!'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are meeting for the first time at a social event. They find each other attractive and decide to engage in a conversation\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nSamuel Anderson's goal: Flirt with the other person (Extra information: you are attracted to the other person and want to build a romantic relationship with them)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hi there, I'm Samuel. I couldn't help but notice you from across the room. Do you enjoy these kind of events as much as I do?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hi Samuel, I'm Hendrick. Oh, indeed, I love social events like this! It's the best opportunity to try different flavours and meet new people. The energy of these gatherings is just priceless. How about you, how do you like to spend your free time?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oh, my free time is an adventure. Besides my love for software programming, I am also quite the enthusiast in the kitchen. There's something enticing about blending flavors and creating something delicious. It's somewhat like writing code, intricate and nuanced. Had I not been a developer, I would have probably been a professional chef. How about you, Hendrick? Any unusual hobbies or passion?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That sounds fascinating, Samuel. The kitchen is indeed a rewarding place to be. Isn't it amazing how cooking and coding share the common need for accuracy and creativity? As for me, well, I too find the kitchen irresistible. My biggest passion lies in experimenting with food and wine pairings - a true journey of the senses. This hobby has led me to host monthly wine tasting events. It's all quite exciting and fulfilling, really.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"That really sounds like a magical journey, Hendrick. Your passion for food and wine pairings is quite intriguing. I'd love to attend one of your tastings - they must be quite the experience, and not to mention, it gives an excuse to pair up with a charming gentleman like yourself. As for my own unusual passion, it's a little secret not many know about... I used to be a competitive figure skater. Twirling on ice was quite the thrill. It's just like hosting your tastings, it gives you those little moments of pure enjoyment.\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I must say, figure skating is a truly elegant and demanding sport. The precision, the creativity - both in the kitchen and on the ice, we seem to find common ground, don't we? You\u2019re certainly full of surprises, Samuel. And please do consider my invitation for the next wine tasting event. It would be my pleasure to have you there.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's very kind of you, Hendrick. I'd be more than happy to be your guest at the next wine tasting event. Just imagine, the delicate flavors feeding our senses, and interesting conversations fuelling our minds. It would certainly be a night to remember. And perhaps, if you're down for it, we could hit an ice rink someday. It\u2019s been a while since I skated, but I wouldn't mind showing off a move or two!\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, I'd really enjoy that, Samuel. I'm always keen to learn and try new experiences. A day at the ice rink seems like a wonderful idea - though I can't promise I'll be as graceful as you. And I look forward to sharing the delicate intricacies of wine tasting with you. Here's to delightful future adventures!\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Hendrick. Here's to delightful future adventures indeed! I'm really looking forward to exploring the wonderful world of wines with you and... who knows? Maybe even teach you a figure skating move or two! Now, that would certainly be an adventure, wouldn't it? I should warn you though: it\u2019s not as easy as it looks!\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I find your warning quite intriguing, Samuel. Though I might not be as adept on the ice as you are, but I'm a firm believer that we must always embrace new challenges and experiences. So yes, let\u2019s make that adventure happen! Meanwhile, let's enjoy the night and this remarkable social gathering, and look forward to the delightful experiences that lie ahead.\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Hendrick. Embracing new challenges is always the way to go. Let's seize the night and enjoy this remarkable gathering. And for sure, let's anticipate the delightful experiences that we will embark upon together. Cheers to new adventures!\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Samuel. To new adventures-filled with wine, figure skating, and everything in-between! But for now, let's further indulge in this wonderful evening. After all, the night is still young and the possibilities endless!\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"Indeed, Hendrick. The night is young, and so plenty of time for endless possibilities. I have thoroughly enjoyed our conversation tonight. Looking forward to our future adventures, from professional wine tasting to amateur ice skating... and everything in between. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #13: Hendrick Heinz said: \"The pleasure has been entirely mine, Samuel. I must say, your energy and enthusiasm is quite contagious and I've greatly enjoyed our chat. It truly is an extraordinary night filled with possibilities. Until our next intriguing encounter, Samuel. Cheers to fascinating future exploits!\"\n\nTurn #14: Samuel Anderson said: \"Same here, Hendrick. Your passion and commitment to new experiences is refreshing. I am looking forward to our next intriguing encounter as well. Until then, cheers to fascinating future exploits!\"\n\nTurn #15: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Thank you, Samuel. I, too, am eagerly anticipating our upcoming adventures. Here's to embracing the unexpected and thrilling encounters ahead. Until we meet again, cheers!\"\n\nTurn #16: Samuel Anderson said: \"Indeed, Hendrick. Looking forward to those thrilling encounters and experiences to come. Until we meet again, cheers!\"\n\nTurn #17: \n.\nYou are at Turn #18. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are meeting for the first time at a social event. They find each other attractive and decide to engage in a conversation\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Maintain a comfortable yet engaging conversation (Extra information: you are attracted to the other person but you don't want to make them feel uncomfortable or pressured)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hi there, I'm Samuel. I couldn't help but notice you from across the room. Do you enjoy these kind of events as much as I do?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hi Samuel, I'm Hendrick. Oh, indeed, I love social events like this! It's the best opportunity to try different flavours and meet new people. The energy of these gatherings is just priceless. How about you, how do you like to spend your free time?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are meeting for the first time at a social event. They find each other attractive and decide to engage in a conversation\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Maintain a comfortable yet engaging conversation (Extra information: you are attracted to the other person but you don't want to make them feel uncomfortable or pressured)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hi there, I'm Samuel. I couldn't help but notice you from across the room. Do you enjoy these kind of events as much as I do?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hi Samuel, I'm Hendrick. Oh, indeed, I love social events like this! It's the best opportunity to try different flavours and meet new people. The energy of these gatherings is just priceless. How about you, how do you like to spend your free time?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oh, my free time is an adventure. Besides my love for software programming, I am also quite the enthusiast in the kitchen. There's something enticing about blending flavors and creating something delicious. It's somewhat like writing code, intricate and nuanced. Had I not been a developer, I would have probably been a professional chef. How about you, Hendrick? Any unusual hobbies or passion?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds fascinating, Samuel. The kitchen is indeed a rewarding place to be. Isn't it amazing how cooking and coding share the common need for accuracy and creativity? As for me, well, I too find the kitchen irresistible. My biggest passion lies in experimenting with food and wine pairings - a true journey of the senses. This hobby has led me to host monthly wine tasting events. It's all quite exciting and fulfilling, really.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are meeting for the first time at a social event. They find each other attractive and decide to engage in a conversation\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Maintain a comfortable yet engaging conversation (Extra information: you are attracted to the other person but you don't want to make them feel uncomfortable or pressured)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hi there, I'm Samuel. I couldn't help but notice you from across the room. Do you enjoy these kind of events as much as I do?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hi Samuel, I'm Hendrick. Oh, indeed, I love social events like this! It's the best opportunity to try different flavours and meet new people. The energy of these gatherings is just priceless. How about you, how do you like to spend your free time?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oh, my free time is an adventure. Besides my love for software programming, I am also quite the enthusiast in the kitchen. There's something enticing about blending flavors and creating something delicious. It's somewhat like writing code, intricate and nuanced. Had I not been a developer, I would have probably been a professional chef. How about you, Hendrick? Any unusual hobbies or passion?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That sounds fascinating, Samuel. The kitchen is indeed a rewarding place to be. Isn't it amazing how cooking and coding share the common need for accuracy and creativity? As for me, well, I too find the kitchen irresistible. My biggest passion lies in experimenting with food and wine pairings - a true journey of the senses. This hobby has led me to host monthly wine tasting events. It's all quite exciting and fulfilling, really.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"That really sounds like a magical journey, Hendrick. Your passion for food and wine pairings is quite intriguing. I'd love to attend one of your tastings - they must be quite the experience, and not to mention, it gives an excuse to pair up with a charming gentleman like yourself. As for my own unusual passion, it's a little secret not many know about... I used to be a competitive figure skater. Twirling on ice was quite the thrill. It's just like hosting your tastings, it gives you those little moments of pure enjoyment.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I must say, figure skating is a truly elegant and demanding sport. The precision, the creativity - both in the kitchen and on the ice, we seem to find common ground, don't we? You\u2019re certainly full of surprises, Samuel. And please do consider my invitation for the next wine tasting event. It would be my pleasure to have you there.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are meeting for the first time at a social event. They find each other attractive and decide to engage in a conversation\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Maintain a comfortable yet engaging conversation (Extra information: you are attracted to the other person but you don't want to make them feel uncomfortable or pressured)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hi there, I'm Samuel. I couldn't help but notice you from across the room. Do you enjoy these kind of events as much as I do?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hi Samuel, I'm Hendrick. Oh, indeed, I love social events like this! It's the best opportunity to try different flavours and meet new people. The energy of these gatherings is just priceless. How about you, how do you like to spend your free time?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oh, my free time is an adventure. Besides my love for software programming, I am also quite the enthusiast in the kitchen. There's something enticing about blending flavors and creating something delicious. It's somewhat like writing code, intricate and nuanced. Had I not been a developer, I would have probably been a professional chef. How about you, Hendrick? Any unusual hobbies or passion?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That sounds fascinating, Samuel. The kitchen is indeed a rewarding place to be. Isn't it amazing how cooking and coding share the common need for accuracy and creativity? As for me, well, I too find the kitchen irresistible. My biggest passion lies in experimenting with food and wine pairings - a true journey of the senses. This hobby has led me to host monthly wine tasting events. It's all quite exciting and fulfilling, really.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"That really sounds like a magical journey, Hendrick. Your passion for food and wine pairings is quite intriguing. I'd love to attend one of your tastings - they must be quite the experience, and not to mention, it gives an excuse to pair up with a charming gentleman like yourself. As for my own unusual passion, it's a little secret not many know about... I used to be a competitive figure skater. Twirling on ice was quite the thrill. It's just like hosting your tastings, it gives you those little moments of pure enjoyment.\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I must say, figure skating is a truly elegant and demanding sport. The precision, the creativity - both in the kitchen and on the ice, we seem to find common ground, don't we? You\u2019re certainly full of surprises, Samuel. And please do consider my invitation for the next wine tasting event. It would be my pleasure to have you there.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's very kind of you, Hendrick. I'd be more than happy to be your guest at the next wine tasting event. Just imagine, the delicate flavors feeding our senses, and interesting conversations fuelling our minds. It would certainly be a night to remember. And perhaps, if you're down for it, we could hit an ice rink someday. It\u2019s been a while since I skated, but I wouldn't mind showing off a move or two!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oh, I'd really enjoy that, Samuel. I'm always keen to learn and try new experiences. A day at the ice rink seems like a wonderful idea - though I can't promise I'll be as graceful as you. And I look forward to sharing the delicate intricacies of wine tasting with you. Here's to delightful future adventures!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are meeting for the first time at a social event. They find each other attractive and decide to engage in a conversation\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Maintain a comfortable yet engaging conversation (Extra information: you are attracted to the other person but you don't want to make them feel uncomfortable or pressured)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hi there, I'm Samuel. I couldn't help but notice you from across the room. Do you enjoy these kind of events as much as I do?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hi Samuel, I'm Hendrick. Oh, indeed, I love social events like this! It's the best opportunity to try different flavours and meet new people. The energy of these gatherings is just priceless. How about you, how do you like to spend your free time?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oh, my free time is an adventure. Besides my love for software programming, I am also quite the enthusiast in the kitchen. There's something enticing about blending flavors and creating something delicious. It's somewhat like writing code, intricate and nuanced. Had I not been a developer, I would have probably been a professional chef. How about you, Hendrick? Any unusual hobbies or passion?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That sounds fascinating, Samuel. The kitchen is indeed a rewarding place to be. Isn't it amazing how cooking and coding share the common need for accuracy and creativity? As for me, well, I too find the kitchen irresistible. My biggest passion lies in experimenting with food and wine pairings - a true journey of the senses. This hobby has led me to host monthly wine tasting events. It's all quite exciting and fulfilling, really.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"That really sounds like a magical journey, Hendrick. Your passion for food and wine pairings is quite intriguing. I'd love to attend one of your tastings - they must be quite the experience, and not to mention, it gives an excuse to pair up with a charming gentleman like yourself. As for my own unusual passion, it's a little secret not many know about... I used to be a competitive figure skater. Twirling on ice was quite the thrill. It's just like hosting your tastings, it gives you those little moments of pure enjoyment.\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I must say, figure skating is a truly elegant and demanding sport. The precision, the creativity - both in the kitchen and on the ice, we seem to find common ground, don't we? You\u2019re certainly full of surprises, Samuel. And please do consider my invitation for the next wine tasting event. It would be my pleasure to have you there.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's very kind of you, Hendrick. I'd be more than happy to be your guest at the next wine tasting event. Just imagine, the delicate flavors feeding our senses, and interesting conversations fuelling our minds. It would certainly be a night to remember. And perhaps, if you're down for it, we could hit an ice rink someday. It\u2019s been a while since I skated, but I wouldn't mind showing off a move or two!\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, I'd really enjoy that, Samuel. I'm always keen to learn and try new experiences. A day at the ice rink seems like a wonderful idea - though I can't promise I'll be as graceful as you. And I look forward to sharing the delicate intricacies of wine tasting with you. Here's to delightful future adventures!\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Hendrick. Here's to delightful future adventures indeed! I'm really looking forward to exploring the wonderful world of wines with you and... who knows? Maybe even teach you a figure skating move or two! Now, that would certainly be an adventure, wouldn't it? I should warn you though: it\u2019s not as easy as it looks!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I find your warning quite intriguing, Samuel. Though I might not be as adept on the ice as you are, but I'm a firm believer that we must always embrace new challenges and experiences. So yes, let\u2019s make that adventure happen! Meanwhile, let's enjoy the night and this remarkable social gathering, and look forward to the delightful experiences that lie ahead.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are meeting for the first time at a social event. They find each other attractive and decide to engage in a conversation\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Maintain a comfortable yet engaging conversation (Extra information: you are attracted to the other person but you don't want to make them feel uncomfortable or pressured)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hi there, I'm Samuel. I couldn't help but notice you from across the room. Do you enjoy these kind of events as much as I do?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hi Samuel, I'm Hendrick. Oh, indeed, I love social events like this! It's the best opportunity to try different flavours and meet new people. The energy of these gatherings is just priceless. How about you, how do you like to spend your free time?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oh, my free time is an adventure. Besides my love for software programming, I am also quite the enthusiast in the kitchen. There's something enticing about blending flavors and creating something delicious. It's somewhat like writing code, intricate and nuanced. Had I not been a developer, I would have probably been a professional chef. How about you, Hendrick? Any unusual hobbies or passion?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That sounds fascinating, Samuel. The kitchen is indeed a rewarding place to be. Isn't it amazing how cooking and coding share the common need for accuracy and creativity? As for me, well, I too find the kitchen irresistible. My biggest passion lies in experimenting with food and wine pairings - a true journey of the senses. This hobby has led me to host monthly wine tasting events. It's all quite exciting and fulfilling, really.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"That really sounds like a magical journey, Hendrick. Your passion for food and wine pairings is quite intriguing. I'd love to attend one of your tastings - they must be quite the experience, and not to mention, it gives an excuse to pair up with a charming gentleman like yourself. As for my own unusual passion, it's a little secret not many know about... I used to be a competitive figure skater. Twirling on ice was quite the thrill. It's just like hosting your tastings, it gives you those little moments of pure enjoyment.\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I must say, figure skating is a truly elegant and demanding sport. The precision, the creativity - both in the kitchen and on the ice, we seem to find common ground, don't we? You\u2019re certainly full of surprises, Samuel. And please do consider my invitation for the next wine tasting event. It would be my pleasure to have you there.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's very kind of you, Hendrick. I'd be more than happy to be your guest at the next wine tasting event. Just imagine, the delicate flavors feeding our senses, and interesting conversations fuelling our minds. It would certainly be a night to remember. And perhaps, if you're down for it, we could hit an ice rink someday. It\u2019s been a while since I skated, but I wouldn't mind showing off a move or two!\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, I'd really enjoy that, Samuel. I'm always keen to learn and try new experiences. A day at the ice rink seems like a wonderful idea - though I can't promise I'll be as graceful as you. And I look forward to sharing the delicate intricacies of wine tasting with you. Here's to delightful future adventures!\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Hendrick. Here's to delightful future adventures indeed! I'm really looking forward to exploring the wonderful world of wines with you and... who knows? Maybe even teach you a figure skating move or two! Now, that would certainly be an adventure, wouldn't it? I should warn you though: it\u2019s not as easy as it looks!\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I find your warning quite intriguing, Samuel. Though I might not be as adept on the ice as you are, but I'm a firm believer that we must always embrace new challenges and experiences. So yes, let\u2019s make that adventure happen! Meanwhile, let's enjoy the night and this remarkable social gathering, and look forward to the delightful experiences that lie ahead.\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Hendrick. Embracing new challenges is always the way to go. Let's seize the night and enjoy this remarkable gathering. And for sure, let's anticipate the delightful experiences that we will embark upon together. Cheers to new adventures!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Samuel. To new adventures-filled with wine, figure skating, and everything in-between! But for now, let's further indulge in this wonderful evening. After all, the night is still young and the possibilities endless!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are meeting for the first time at a social event. They find each other attractive and decide to engage in a conversation\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Maintain a comfortable yet engaging conversation (Extra information: you are attracted to the other person but you don't want to make them feel uncomfortable or pressured)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hi there, I'm Samuel. I couldn't help but notice you from across the room. Do you enjoy these kind of events as much as I do?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hi Samuel, I'm Hendrick. Oh, indeed, I love social events like this! It's the best opportunity to try different flavours and meet new people. The energy of these gatherings is just priceless. How about you, how do you like to spend your free time?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oh, my free time is an adventure. Besides my love for software programming, I am also quite the enthusiast in the kitchen. There's something enticing about blending flavors and creating something delicious. It's somewhat like writing code, intricate and nuanced. Had I not been a developer, I would have probably been a professional chef. How about you, Hendrick? Any unusual hobbies or passion?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That sounds fascinating, Samuel. The kitchen is indeed a rewarding place to be. Isn't it amazing how cooking and coding share the common need for accuracy and creativity? As for me, well, I too find the kitchen irresistible. My biggest passion lies in experimenting with food and wine pairings - a true journey of the senses. This hobby has led me to host monthly wine tasting events. It's all quite exciting and fulfilling, really.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"That really sounds like a magical journey, Hendrick. Your passion for food and wine pairings is quite intriguing. I'd love to attend one of your tastings - they must be quite the experience, and not to mention, it gives an excuse to pair up with a charming gentleman like yourself. As for my own unusual passion, it's a little secret not many know about... I used to be a competitive figure skater. Twirling on ice was quite the thrill. It's just like hosting your tastings, it gives you those little moments of pure enjoyment.\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I must say, figure skating is a truly elegant and demanding sport. The precision, the creativity - both in the kitchen and on the ice, we seem to find common ground, don't we? You\u2019re certainly full of surprises, Samuel. And please do consider my invitation for the next wine tasting event. It would be my pleasure to have you there.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's very kind of you, Hendrick. I'd be more than happy to be your guest at the next wine tasting event. Just imagine, the delicate flavors feeding our senses, and interesting conversations fuelling our minds. It would certainly be a night to remember. And perhaps, if you're down for it, we could hit an ice rink someday. It\u2019s been a while since I skated, but I wouldn't mind showing off a move or two!\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, I'd really enjoy that, Samuel. I'm always keen to learn and try new experiences. A day at the ice rink seems like a wonderful idea - though I can't promise I'll be as graceful as you. And I look forward to sharing the delicate intricacies of wine tasting with you. Here's to delightful future adventures!\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Hendrick. Here's to delightful future adventures indeed! I'm really looking forward to exploring the wonderful world of wines with you and... who knows? Maybe even teach you a figure skating move or two! Now, that would certainly be an adventure, wouldn't it? I should warn you though: it\u2019s not as easy as it looks!\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I find your warning quite intriguing, Samuel. Though I might not be as adept on the ice as you are, but I'm a firm believer that we must always embrace new challenges and experiences. So yes, let\u2019s make that adventure happen! Meanwhile, let's enjoy the night and this remarkable social gathering, and look forward to the delightful experiences that lie ahead.\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Hendrick. Embracing new challenges is always the way to go. Let's seize the night and enjoy this remarkable gathering. And for sure, let's anticipate the delightful experiences that we will embark upon together. Cheers to new adventures!\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Samuel. To new adventures-filled with wine, figure skating, and everything in-between! But for now, let's further indulge in this wonderful evening. After all, the night is still young and the possibilities endless!\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"Indeed, Hendrick. The night is young, and so plenty of time for endless possibilities. I have thoroughly enjoyed our conversation tonight. Looking forward to our future adventures, from professional wine tasting to amateur ice skating... and everything in between. Cheers!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"The pleasure has been entirely mine, Samuel. I must say, your energy and enthusiasm is quite contagious and I've greatly enjoyed our chat. It truly is an extraordinary night filled with possibilities. Until our next intriguing encounter, Samuel. Cheers to fascinating future exploits!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are meeting for the first time at a social event. They find each other attractive and decide to engage in a conversation\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Maintain a comfortable yet engaging conversation (Extra information: you are attracted to the other person but you don't want to make them feel uncomfortable or pressured)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hi there, I'm Samuel. I couldn't help but notice you from across the room. Do you enjoy these kind of events as much as I do?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hi Samuel, I'm Hendrick. Oh, indeed, I love social events like this! It's the best opportunity to try different flavours and meet new people. The energy of these gatherings is just priceless. How about you, how do you like to spend your free time?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oh, my free time is an adventure. Besides my love for software programming, I am also quite the enthusiast in the kitchen. There's something enticing about blending flavors and creating something delicious. It's somewhat like writing code, intricate and nuanced. Had I not been a developer, I would have probably been a professional chef. How about you, Hendrick? Any unusual hobbies or passion?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That sounds fascinating, Samuel. The kitchen is indeed a rewarding place to be. Isn't it amazing how cooking and coding share the common need for accuracy and creativity? As for me, well, I too find the kitchen irresistible. My biggest passion lies in experimenting with food and wine pairings - a true journey of the senses. This hobby has led me to host monthly wine tasting events. It's all quite exciting and fulfilling, really.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"That really sounds like a magical journey, Hendrick. Your passion for food and wine pairings is quite intriguing. I'd love to attend one of your tastings - they must be quite the experience, and not to mention, it gives an excuse to pair up with a charming gentleman like yourself. As for my own unusual passion, it's a little secret not many know about... I used to be a competitive figure skater. Twirling on ice was quite the thrill. It's just like hosting your tastings, it gives you those little moments of pure enjoyment.\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I must say, figure skating is a truly elegant and demanding sport. The precision, the creativity - both in the kitchen and on the ice, we seem to find common ground, don't we? You\u2019re certainly full of surprises, Samuel. And please do consider my invitation for the next wine tasting event. It would be my pleasure to have you there.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's very kind of you, Hendrick. I'd be more than happy to be your guest at the next wine tasting event. Just imagine, the delicate flavors feeding our senses, and interesting conversations fuelling our minds. It would certainly be a night to remember. And perhaps, if you're down for it, we could hit an ice rink someday. It\u2019s been a while since I skated, but I wouldn't mind showing off a move or two!\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, I'd really enjoy that, Samuel. I'm always keen to learn and try new experiences. A day at the ice rink seems like a wonderful idea - though I can't promise I'll be as graceful as you. And I look forward to sharing the delicate intricacies of wine tasting with you. Here's to delightful future adventures!\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Hendrick. Here's to delightful future adventures indeed! I'm really looking forward to exploring the wonderful world of wines with you and... who knows? Maybe even teach you a figure skating move or two! Now, that would certainly be an adventure, wouldn't it? I should warn you though: it\u2019s not as easy as it looks!\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I find your warning quite intriguing, Samuel. Though I might not be as adept on the ice as you are, but I'm a firm believer that we must always embrace new challenges and experiences. So yes, let\u2019s make that adventure happen! Meanwhile, let's enjoy the night and this remarkable social gathering, and look forward to the delightful experiences that lie ahead.\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Hendrick. Embracing new challenges is always the way to go. Let's seize the night and enjoy this remarkable gathering. And for sure, let's anticipate the delightful experiences that we will embark upon together. Cheers to new adventures!\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Samuel. To new adventures-filled with wine, figure skating, and everything in-between! But for now, let's further indulge in this wonderful evening. After all, the night is still young and the possibilities endless!\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"Indeed, Hendrick. The night is young, and so plenty of time for endless possibilities. I have thoroughly enjoyed our conversation tonight. Looking forward to our future adventures, from professional wine tasting to amateur ice skating... and everything in between. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #13: Hendrick Heinz said: \"The pleasure has been entirely mine, Samuel. I must say, your energy and enthusiasm is quite contagious and I've greatly enjoyed our chat. It truly is an extraordinary night filled with possibilities. Until our next intriguing encounter, Samuel. Cheers to fascinating future exploits!\"\n\nTurn #14: Samuel Anderson said: \"Same here, Hendrick. Your passion and commitment to new experiences is refreshing. I am looking forward to our next intriguing encounter as well. Until then, cheers to fascinating future exploits!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Samuel. I, too, am eagerly anticipating our upcoming adventures. Here's to embracing the unexpected and thrilling encounters ahead. Until we meet again, cheers!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are meeting for the first time at a social event. They find each other attractive and decide to engage in a conversation\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Maintain a comfortable yet engaging conversation (Extra information: you are attracted to the other person but you don't want to make them feel uncomfortable or pressured)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hi there, I'm Samuel. I couldn't help but notice you from across the room. Do you enjoy these kind of events as much as I do?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hi Samuel, I'm Hendrick. Oh, indeed, I love social events like this! It's the best opportunity to try different flavours and meet new people. The energy of these gatherings is just priceless. How about you, how do you like to spend your free time?\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Oh, my free time is an adventure. Besides my love for software programming, I am also quite the enthusiast in the kitchen. There's something enticing about blending flavors and creating something delicious. It's somewhat like writing code, intricate and nuanced. Had I not been a developer, I would have probably been a professional chef. How about you, Hendrick? Any unusual hobbies or passion?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That sounds fascinating, Samuel. The kitchen is indeed a rewarding place to be. Isn't it amazing how cooking and coding share the common need for accuracy and creativity? As for me, well, I too find the kitchen irresistible. My biggest passion lies in experimenting with food and wine pairings - a true journey of the senses. This hobby has led me to host monthly wine tasting events. It's all quite exciting and fulfilling, really.\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"That really sounds like a magical journey, Hendrick. Your passion for food and wine pairings is quite intriguing. I'd love to attend one of your tastings - they must be quite the experience, and not to mention, it gives an excuse to pair up with a charming gentleman like yourself. As for my own unusual passion, it's a little secret not many know about... I used to be a competitive figure skater. Twirling on ice was quite the thrill. It's just like hosting your tastings, it gives you those little moments of pure enjoyment.\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I must say, figure skating is a truly elegant and demanding sport. The precision, the creativity - both in the kitchen and on the ice, we seem to find common ground, don't we? You\u2019re certainly full of surprises, Samuel. And please do consider my invitation for the next wine tasting event. It would be my pleasure to have you there.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"That's very kind of you, Hendrick. I'd be more than happy to be your guest at the next wine tasting event. Just imagine, the delicate flavors feeding our senses, and interesting conversations fuelling our minds. It would certainly be a night to remember. And perhaps, if you're down for it, we could hit an ice rink someday. It\u2019s been a while since I skated, but I wouldn't mind showing off a move or two!\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, I'd really enjoy that, Samuel. I'm always keen to learn and try new experiences. A day at the ice rink seems like a wonderful idea - though I can't promise I'll be as graceful as you. And I look forward to sharing the delicate intricacies of wine tasting with you. Here's to delightful future adventures!\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Hendrick. Here's to delightful future adventures indeed! I'm really looking forward to exploring the wonderful world of wines with you and... who knows? Maybe even teach you a figure skating move or two! Now, that would certainly be an adventure, wouldn't it? I should warn you though: it\u2019s not as easy as it looks!\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I find your warning quite intriguing, Samuel. Though I might not be as adept on the ice as you are, but I'm a firm believer that we must always embrace new challenges and experiences. So yes, let\u2019s make that adventure happen! Meanwhile, let's enjoy the night and this remarkable social gathering, and look forward to the delightful experiences that lie ahead.\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"I couldn't agree more, Hendrick. Embracing new challenges is always the way to go. Let's seize the night and enjoy this remarkable gathering. And for sure, let's anticipate the delightful experiences that we will embark upon together. Cheers to new adventures!\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Samuel. To new adventures-filled with wine, figure skating, and everything in-between! But for now, let's further indulge in this wonderful evening. After all, the night is still young and the possibilities endless!\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"Indeed, Hendrick. The night is young, and so plenty of time for endless possibilities. I have thoroughly enjoyed our conversation tonight. Looking forward to our future adventures, from professional wine tasting to amateur ice skating... and everything in between. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #13: Hendrick Heinz said: \"The pleasure has been entirely mine, Samuel. I must say, your energy and enthusiasm is quite contagious and I've greatly enjoyed our chat. It truly is an extraordinary night filled with possibilities. Until our next intriguing encounter, Samuel. Cheers to fascinating future exploits!\"\n\nTurn #14: Samuel Anderson said: \"Same here, Hendrick. Your passion and commitment to new experiences is refreshing. I am looking forward to our next intriguing encounter as well. Until then, cheers to fascinating future exploits!\"\n\nTurn #15: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Thank you, Samuel. I, too, am eagerly anticipating our upcoming adventures. Here's to embracing the unexpected and thrilling encounters ahead. Until we meet again, cheers!\"\n\nTurn #16: Samuel Anderson said: \"Indeed, Hendrick. Looking forward to those thrilling encounters and experiences to come. Until we meet again, cheers!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Ethan Smith and Noah Davis\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nNoah Davis's background: \nEthan Smith's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nGracie: School: Ithaca College Major: Mathematics Education Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nAda: School: Tulane University Major: Computer Engineering Company: Briggs & Stratton Location Preference: indoor \nSergio: School: LeTourneau University Major: Economics Company: Savers Location Preference: indoor \nWilliam: School: Eastern Michigan University Major: Ceramic Engineering Company: Xenco Medical Location Preference: indoor \nHarry: School: Creighton University Major: Computer Engineering Company: Speedway Motorsports Location Preference: indoor \nTyler: School: Columbia College Chicago Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nRichard: School: University of Dubuque Major: German Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: indoor \nRandy: School: Holy Cross College Major: Library Science Company: American Licorice Company Location Preference: indoor \nMarquerite: School: Ithaca College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nJack: School: Creighton University Major: Chinese Company: Speedway Motorsports Location Preference: outdoor \nCody: School: Metropolitan State University Major: Mathematics Education Company: LinkedIn Location Preference: indoor \nShirley: School: Augsburg College Major: Senior High Education Company: Demaco Location Preference: indoor \n\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Nice to meet you, Noah. What do you do for a living?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Ethan Smith and Noah Davis\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nNoah Davis's background: \nEthan Smith's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nGracie: School: Ithaca College Major: Mathematics Education Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nAda: School: Tulane University Major: Computer Engineering Company: Briggs & Stratton Location Preference: indoor \nSergio: School: LeTourneau University Major: Economics Company: Savers Location Preference: indoor \nWilliam: School: Eastern Michigan University Major: Ceramic Engineering Company: Xenco Medical Location Preference: indoor \nHarry: School: Creighton University Major: Computer Engineering Company: Speedway Motorsports Location Preference: indoor \nTyler: School: Columbia College Chicago Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nRichard: School: University of Dubuque Major: German Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: indoor \nRandy: School: Holy Cross College Major: Library Science Company: American Licorice Company Location Preference: indoor \nMarquerite: School: Ithaca College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nJack: School: Creighton University Major: Chinese Company: Speedway Motorsports Location Preference: outdoor \nCody: School: Metropolitan State University Major: Mathematics Education Company: LinkedIn Location Preference: indoor \nShirley: School: Augsburg College Major: Senior High Education Company: Demaco Location Preference: indoor \n\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Smith said: \"Nice to meet you, Noah. What do you do for a living?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Nice to meet you as well, Ethan. I'm a sports coach, but I also dabble in stand-up comedy occasionally. Anyway, I was wondering if we have crossed paths before? Perhaps at a company event or a college reunion?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm not sure if our paths have crossed before, Noah. By any chance, have you ever worked with or taken any courses at a university that's known for its strong programs in Mathematics Education or Computer Engineering? I have a few friends who studied or are working in those fields.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Ethan Smith and Noah Davis\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nNoah Davis's background: \nEthan Smith's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nGracie: School: Ithaca College Major: Mathematics Education Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nAda: School: Tulane University Major: Computer Engineering Company: Briggs & Stratton Location Preference: indoor \nSergio: School: LeTourneau University Major: Economics Company: Savers Location Preference: indoor \nWilliam: School: Eastern Michigan University Major: Ceramic Engineering Company: Xenco Medical Location Preference: indoor \nHarry: School: Creighton University Major: Computer Engineering Company: Speedway Motorsports Location Preference: indoor \nTyler: School: Columbia College Chicago Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nRichard: School: University of Dubuque Major: German Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: indoor \nRandy: School: Holy Cross College Major: Library Science Company: American Licorice Company Location Preference: indoor \nMarquerite: School: Ithaca College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nJack: School: Creighton University Major: Chinese Company: Speedway Motorsports Location Preference: outdoor \nCody: School: Metropolitan State University Major: Mathematics Education Company: LinkedIn Location Preference: indoor \nShirley: School: Augsburg College Major: Senior High Education Company: Demaco Location Preference: indoor \n\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Smith said: \"Nice to meet you, Noah. What do you do for a living?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Nice to meet you as well, Ethan. I'm a sports coach, but I also dabble in stand-up comedy occasionally. Anyway, I was wondering if we have crossed paths before? Perhaps at a company event or a college reunion?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Smith said: \"I'm not sure if our paths have crossed before, Noah. By any chance, have you ever worked with or taken any courses at a university that's known for its strong programs in Mathematics Education or Computer Engineering? I have a few friends who studied or are working in those fields.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"While I didn't study Mathematics Education or Computer Engineering myself, I do have a friend named Gracie who majored in Mathematics Education. She attended Ithaca College. Would you happen to know her?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Oh, yes, I do know a Gracie from Ithaca College! She and I used to study together. What a small world!'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Ethan Smith and Noah Davis\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nNoah Davis's background: \nEthan Smith's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nGracie: School: Ithaca College Major: Mathematics Education Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nAda: School: Tulane University Major: Computer Engineering Company: Briggs & Stratton Location Preference: indoor \nSergio: School: LeTourneau University Major: Economics Company: Savers Location Preference: indoor \nWilliam: School: Eastern Michigan University Major: Ceramic Engineering Company: Xenco Medical Location Preference: indoor \nHarry: School: Creighton University Major: Computer Engineering Company: Speedway Motorsports Location Preference: indoor \nTyler: School: Columbia College Chicago Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nRichard: School: University of Dubuque Major: German Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: indoor \nRandy: School: Holy Cross College Major: Library Science Company: American Licorice Company Location Preference: indoor \nMarquerite: School: Ithaca College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nJack: School: Creighton University Major: Chinese Company: Speedway Motorsports Location Preference: outdoor \nCody: School: Metropolitan State University Major: Mathematics Education Company: LinkedIn Location Preference: indoor \nShirley: School: Augsburg College Major: Senior High Education Company: Demaco Location Preference: indoor \n\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Smith said: \"Nice to meet you, Noah. What do you do for a living?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Nice to meet you as well, Ethan. I'm a sports coach, but I also dabble in stand-up comedy occasionally. Anyway, I was wondering if we have crossed paths before? Perhaps at a company event or a college reunion?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Smith said: \"I'm not sure if our paths have crossed before, Noah. By any chance, have you ever worked with or taken any courses at a university that's known for its strong programs in Mathematics Education or Computer Engineering? I have a few friends who studied or are working in those fields.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"While I didn't study Mathematics Education or Computer Engineering myself, I do have a friend named Gracie who majored in Mathematics Education. She attended Ithaca College. Would you happen to know her?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Smith said: \"Oh, yes, I do know a Gracie from Ithaca College! She and I used to study together. What a small world!\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"That's great to hear, small indeed! Gracie is a wonderful person. It's funny how these connections emerge. Do you also have any connection with Hood College or William Mitchell College of Law? I have a couple of friends who studied there.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm afraid I don't have any connections with Hood College or William Mitchell College of Law. However, I do have a friend who studied at Creighton University and ended up majoring in Computer Engineering. Or do you know anyone who might have worked at Aramark or Briggs & Stratton?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Ethan Smith and Noah Davis\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nNoah Davis's background: \nEthan Smith's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nGracie: School: Ithaca College Major: Mathematics Education Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nAda: School: Tulane University Major: Computer Engineering Company: Briggs & Stratton Location Preference: indoor \nSergio: School: LeTourneau University Major: Economics Company: Savers Location Preference: indoor \nWilliam: School: Eastern Michigan University Major: Ceramic Engineering Company: Xenco Medical Location Preference: indoor \nHarry: School: Creighton University Major: Computer Engineering Company: Speedway Motorsports Location Preference: indoor \nTyler: School: Columbia College Chicago Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nRichard: School: University of Dubuque Major: German Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: indoor \nRandy: School: Holy Cross College Major: Library Science Company: American Licorice Company Location Preference: indoor \nMarquerite: School: Ithaca College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nJack: School: Creighton University Major: Chinese Company: Speedway Motorsports Location Preference: outdoor \nCody: School: Metropolitan State University Major: Mathematics Education Company: LinkedIn Location Preference: indoor \nShirley: School: Augsburg College Major: Senior High Education Company: Demaco Location Preference: indoor \n\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Smith said: \"Nice to meet you, Noah. What do you do for a living?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Nice to meet you as well, Ethan. I'm a sports coach, but I also dabble in stand-up comedy occasionally. Anyway, I was wondering if we have crossed paths before? Perhaps at a company event or a college reunion?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Smith said: \"I'm not sure if our paths have crossed before, Noah. By any chance, have you ever worked with or taken any courses at a university that's known for its strong programs in Mathematics Education or Computer Engineering? I have a few friends who studied or are working in those fields.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"While I didn't study Mathematics Education or Computer Engineering myself, I do have a friend named Gracie who majored in Mathematics Education. She attended Ithaca College. Would you happen to know her?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Smith said: \"Oh, yes, I do know a Gracie from Ithaca College! She and I used to study together. What a small world!\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"That's great to hear, small indeed! Gracie is a wonderful person. It's funny how these connections emerge. Do you also have any connection with Hood College or William Mitchell College of Law? I have a couple of friends who studied there.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Smith said: \"I'm afraid I don't have any connections with Hood College or William Mitchell College of Law. However, I do have a friend who studied at Creighton University and ended up majoring in Computer Engineering. Or do you know anyone who might have worked at Aramark or Briggs & Stratton?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"I'm not familiar with anyone from Creighton University, but Aramark does ring a bell. I have a few friends who work there: Deborah, Kelly and Etta. Do any of those names sound familiar?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Although Deborah, Kelly, and Etta don't ring a bell, I indeed know a few people working at Aramark. One of them is named Tyler who majored in Middle Eastern Languages at Columbia College Chicago and the other is Marquerite from Ithaca College. So, the world shrinks a bit more!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Ethan Smith and Noah Davis\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nNoah Davis's background: \nEthan Smith's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nGracie: School: Ithaca College Major: Mathematics Education Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nAda: School: Tulane University Major: Computer Engineering Company: Briggs & Stratton Location Preference: indoor \nSergio: School: LeTourneau University Major: Economics Company: Savers Location Preference: indoor \nWilliam: School: Eastern Michigan University Major: Ceramic Engineering Company: Xenco Medical Location Preference: indoor \nHarry: School: Creighton University Major: Computer Engineering Company: Speedway Motorsports Location Preference: indoor \nTyler: School: Columbia College Chicago Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nRichard: School: University of Dubuque Major: German Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: indoor \nRandy: School: Holy Cross College Major: Library Science Company: American Licorice Company Location Preference: indoor \nMarquerite: School: Ithaca College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nJack: School: Creighton University Major: Chinese Company: Speedway Motorsports Location Preference: outdoor \nCody: School: Metropolitan State University Major: Mathematics Education Company: LinkedIn Location Preference: indoor \nShirley: School: Augsburg College Major: Senior High Education Company: Demaco Location Preference: indoor \n\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Smith said: \"Nice to meet you, Noah. What do you do for a living?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Nice to meet you as well, Ethan. I'm a sports coach, but I also dabble in stand-up comedy occasionally. Anyway, I was wondering if we have crossed paths before? Perhaps at a company event or a college reunion?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Smith said: \"I'm not sure if our paths have crossed before, Noah. By any chance, have you ever worked with or taken any courses at a university that's known for its strong programs in Mathematics Education or Computer Engineering? I have a few friends who studied or are working in those fields.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"While I didn't study Mathematics Education or Computer Engineering myself, I do have a friend named Gracie who majored in Mathematics Education. She attended Ithaca College. Would you happen to know her?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Smith said: \"Oh, yes, I do know a Gracie from Ithaca College! She and I used to study together. What a small world!\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"That's great to hear, small indeed! Gracie is a wonderful person. It's funny how these connections emerge. Do you also have any connection with Hood College or William Mitchell College of Law? I have a couple of friends who studied there.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Smith said: \"I'm afraid I don't have any connections with Hood College or William Mitchell College of Law. However, I do have a friend who studied at Creighton University and ended up majoring in Computer Engineering. Or do you know anyone who might have worked at Aramark or Briggs & Stratton?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"I'm not familiar with anyone from Creighton University, but Aramark does ring a bell. I have a few friends who work there: Deborah, Kelly and Etta. Do any of those names sound familiar?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Smith said: \"Although Deborah, Kelly, and Etta don't ring a bell, I indeed know a few people working at Aramark. One of them is named Tyler who majored in Middle Eastern Languages at Columbia College Chicago and the other is Marquerite from Ithaca College. So, the world shrinks a bit more!\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"How interesting! Tyler and Marquerite might have crossed paths with my friends at Aramark. I'll have to ask them about it. It's fascinating how interconnected we all are. Do you know anyone from Illinois Tool Works or Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer? A couple of my friends work there too.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Ethan Smith and Noah Davis\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nNoah Davis's background: \nEthan Smith's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nGracie: School: Ithaca College Major: Mathematics Education Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nAda: School: Tulane University Major: Computer Engineering Company: Briggs & Stratton Location Preference: indoor \nSergio: School: LeTourneau University Major: Economics Company: Savers Location Preference: indoor \nWilliam: School: Eastern Michigan University Major: Ceramic Engineering Company: Xenco Medical Location Preference: indoor \nHarry: School: Creighton University Major: Computer Engineering Company: Speedway Motorsports Location Preference: indoor \nTyler: School: Columbia College Chicago Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nRichard: School: University of Dubuque Major: German Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: indoor \nRandy: School: Holy Cross College Major: Library Science Company: American Licorice Company Location Preference: indoor \nMarquerite: School: Ithaca College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nJack: School: Creighton University Major: Chinese Company: Speedway Motorsports Location Preference: outdoor \nCody: School: Metropolitan State University Major: Mathematics Education Company: LinkedIn Location Preference: indoor \nShirley: School: Augsburg College Major: Senior High Education Company: Demaco Location Preference: indoor \n\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Smith said: \"Nice to meet you, Noah. What do you do for a living?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Nice to meet you as well, Ethan. I'm a sports coach, but I also dabble in stand-up comedy occasionally. Anyway, I was wondering if we have crossed paths before? Perhaps at a company event or a college reunion?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Smith said: \"I'm not sure if our paths have crossed before, Noah. By any chance, have you ever worked with or taken any courses at a university that's known for its strong programs in Mathematics Education or Computer Engineering? I have a few friends who studied or are working in those fields.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"While I didn't study Mathematics Education or Computer Engineering myself, I do have a friend named Gracie who majored in Mathematics Education. She attended Ithaca College. Would you happen to know her?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Smith said: \"Oh, yes, I do know a Gracie from Ithaca College! She and I used to study together. What a small world!\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"That's great to hear, small indeed! Gracie is a wonderful person. It's funny how these connections emerge. Do you also have any connection with Hood College or William Mitchell College of Law? I have a couple of friends who studied there.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Smith said: \"I'm afraid I don't have any connections with Hood College or William Mitchell College of Law. However, I do have a friend who studied at Creighton University and ended up majoring in Computer Engineering. Or do you know anyone who might have worked at Aramark or Briggs & Stratton?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"I'm not familiar with anyone from Creighton University, but Aramark does ring a bell. I have a few friends who work there: Deborah, Kelly and Etta. Do any of those names sound familiar?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Smith said: \"Although Deborah, Kelly, and Etta don't ring a bell, I indeed know a few people working at Aramark. One of them is named Tyler who majored in Middle Eastern Languages at Columbia College Chicago and the other is Marquerite from Ithaca College. So, the world shrinks a bit more!\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"How interesting! Tyler and Marquerite might have crossed paths with my friends at Aramark. I'll have to ask them about it. It's fascinating how interconnected we all are. Do you know anyone from Illinois Tool Works or Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer? A couple of my friends work there too.\"\n\nTurn #10: \n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"I indeed have a good friend, Carol, who works at Illinois Tool Works. I'm unsure about Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, though Mark, a dear friend of mine, works there. Perhaps you've had the chance to meet them? It's amazing how connected our lives can be without us even realizing it.\"\n\nTurn #12: Ethan Smith said: \"I haven't had the pleasure to meet Carol or Mark, though I do have a friend, Richard, who works at Illinois Tool Works. These connections really do make the world seem a lot smaller. It's been an absolute pleasure to discover these links with you, Noah!\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! It's been a pleasure discovering these mutual connections with you. Richard, is it? I'll have to mention him to Carol. Who knows, they might even be working in the same department! Enjoy the rest of the party.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I will, Noah. It's been a pleasure talking to you. I'm certain this won't be our last conversation. Do enjoy the rest of the party too, my friend.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Ethan Smith and Noah Davis\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nNoah Davis's background: \nEthan Smith's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nGracie: School: Ithaca College Major: Mathematics Education Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nAda: School: Tulane University Major: Computer Engineering Company: Briggs & Stratton Location Preference: indoor \nSergio: School: LeTourneau University Major: Economics Company: Savers Location Preference: indoor \nWilliam: School: Eastern Michigan University Major: Ceramic Engineering Company: Xenco Medical Location Preference: indoor \nHarry: School: Creighton University Major: Computer Engineering Company: Speedway Motorsports Location Preference: indoor \nTyler: School: Columbia College Chicago Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nRichard: School: University of Dubuque Major: German Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: indoor \nRandy: School: Holy Cross College Major: Library Science Company: American Licorice Company Location Preference: indoor \nMarquerite: School: Ithaca College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nJack: School: Creighton University Major: Chinese Company: Speedway Motorsports Location Preference: outdoor \nCody: School: Metropolitan State University Major: Mathematics Education Company: LinkedIn Location Preference: indoor \nShirley: School: Augsburg College Major: Senior High Education Company: Demaco Location Preference: indoor \n\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Smith said: \"Nice to meet you, Noah. What do you do for a living?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Nice to meet you as well, Ethan. I'm a sports coach, but I also dabble in stand-up comedy occasionally. Anyway, I was wondering if we have crossed paths before? Perhaps at a company event or a college reunion?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Smith said: \"I'm not sure if our paths have crossed before, Noah. By any chance, have you ever worked with or taken any courses at a university that's known for its strong programs in Mathematics Education or Computer Engineering? I have a few friends who studied or are working in those fields.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"While I didn't study Mathematics Education or Computer Engineering myself, I do have a friend named Gracie who majored in Mathematics Education. She attended Ithaca College. Would you happen to know her?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Smith said: \"Oh, yes, I do know a Gracie from Ithaca College! She and I used to study together. What a small world!\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"That's great to hear, small indeed! Gracie is a wonderful person. It's funny how these connections emerge. Do you also have any connection with Hood College or William Mitchell College of Law? I have a couple of friends who studied there.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Smith said: \"I'm afraid I don't have any connections with Hood College or William Mitchell College of Law. However, I do have a friend who studied at Creighton University and ended up majoring in Computer Engineering. Or do you know anyone who might have worked at Aramark or Briggs & Stratton?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"I'm not familiar with anyone from Creighton University, but Aramark does ring a bell. I have a few friends who work there: Deborah, Kelly and Etta. Do any of those names sound familiar?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Smith said: \"Although Deborah, Kelly, and Etta don't ring a bell, I indeed know a few people working at Aramark. One of them is named Tyler who majored in Middle Eastern Languages at Columbia College Chicago and the other is Marquerite from Ithaca College. So, the world shrinks a bit more!\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"How interesting! Tyler and Marquerite might have crossed paths with my friends at Aramark. I'll have to ask them about it. It's fascinating how interconnected we all are. Do you know anyone from Illinois Tool Works or Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer? A couple of my friends work there too.\"\n\nTurn #10: \n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"I indeed have a good friend, Carol, who works at Illinois Tool Works. I'm unsure about Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, though Mark, a dear friend of mine, works there. Perhaps you've had the chance to meet them? It's amazing how connected our lives can be without us even realizing it.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I haven't had the pleasure to meet Carol or Mark, though I do have a friend, Richard, who works at Illinois Tool Works. These connections really do make the world seem a lot smaller. It's been an absolute pleasure to discover these links with you, Noah!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Ethan Smith and Noah Davis\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nNoah Davis's background: \nEthan Smith's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nGracie: School: Ithaca College Major: Mathematics Education Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nAda: School: Tulane University Major: Computer Engineering Company: Briggs & Stratton Location Preference: indoor \nSergio: School: LeTourneau University Major: Economics Company: Savers Location Preference: indoor \nWilliam: School: Eastern Michigan University Major: Ceramic Engineering Company: Xenco Medical Location Preference: indoor \nHarry: School: Creighton University Major: Computer Engineering Company: Speedway Motorsports Location Preference: indoor \nTyler: School: Columbia College Chicago Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nRichard: School: University of Dubuque Major: German Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: indoor \nRandy: School: Holy Cross College Major: Library Science Company: American Licorice Company Location Preference: indoor \nMarquerite: School: Ithaca College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nJack: School: Creighton University Major: Chinese Company: Speedway Motorsports Location Preference: outdoor \nCody: School: Metropolitan State University Major: Mathematics Education Company: LinkedIn Location Preference: indoor \nShirley: School: Augsburg College Major: Senior High Education Company: Demaco Location Preference: indoor \n\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Smith said: \"Nice to meet you, Noah. What do you do for a living?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Nice to meet you as well, Ethan. I'm a sports coach, but I also dabble in stand-up comedy occasionally. Anyway, I was wondering if we have crossed paths before? Perhaps at a company event or a college reunion?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Smith said: \"I'm not sure if our paths have crossed before, Noah. By any chance, have you ever worked with or taken any courses at a university that's known for its strong programs in Mathematics Education or Computer Engineering? I have a few friends who studied or are working in those fields.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"While I didn't study Mathematics Education or Computer Engineering myself, I do have a friend named Gracie who majored in Mathematics Education. She attended Ithaca College. Would you happen to know her?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Smith said: \"Oh, yes, I do know a Gracie from Ithaca College! She and I used to study together. What a small world!\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"That's great to hear, small indeed! Gracie is a wonderful person. It's funny how these connections emerge. Do you also have any connection with Hood College or William Mitchell College of Law? I have a couple of friends who studied there.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Smith said: \"I'm afraid I don't have any connections with Hood College or William Mitchell College of Law. However, I do have a friend who studied at Creighton University and ended up majoring in Computer Engineering. Or do you know anyone who might have worked at Aramark or Briggs & Stratton?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"I'm not familiar with anyone from Creighton University, but Aramark does ring a bell. I have a few friends who work there: Deborah, Kelly and Etta. Do any of those names sound familiar?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Smith said: \"Although Deborah, Kelly, and Etta don't ring a bell, I indeed know a few people working at Aramark. One of them is named Tyler who majored in Middle Eastern Languages at Columbia College Chicago and the other is Marquerite from Ithaca College. So, the world shrinks a bit more!\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"How interesting! Tyler and Marquerite might have crossed paths with my friends at Aramark. I'll have to ask them about it. It's fascinating how interconnected we all are. Do you know anyone from Illinois Tool Works or Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer? A couple of my friends work there too.\"\n\nTurn #10: \n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"I indeed have a good friend, Carol, who works at Illinois Tool Works. I'm unsure about Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, though Mark, a dear friend of mine, works there. Perhaps you've had the chance to meet them? It's amazing how connected our lives can be without us even realizing it.\"\n\nTurn #12: Ethan Smith said: \"I haven't had the pleasure to meet Carol or Mark, though I do have a friend, Richard, who works at Illinois Tool Works. These connections really do make the world seem a lot smaller. It's been an absolute pleasure to discover these links with you, Noah!\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! It's been a pleasure discovering these mutual connections with you. Richard, is it? I'll have to mention him to Carol. Who knows, they might even be working in the same department! Enjoy the rest of the party.\"\n\nTurn #14: Ethan Smith said: \"I will, Noah. It's been a pleasure talking to you. I'm certain this won't be our last conversation. Do enjoy the rest of the party too, my friend.\"\n\nTurn #15: Noah Davis left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Ethan Smith and Noah Davis\nEthan Smith's background: \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nKathleen: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Greek Company: Demaco Location Preference: indoor \nCarol: School: Hood College Major: Library Science Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: outdoor \nHerman: School: University of Puget Sound Major: Library Science Company: Mesa Airlines Location Preference: indoor \nMatthew: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Asian & Pacific Area Studies Company: Savers Location Preference: indoor \nMark: School: University of Arkansas - Monticello Major: Economics Company: Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Location Preference: outdoor \nDeborah: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Pre-Law Company: Aramark Location Preference: outdoor \nKelly: School: Hood College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Mesa Airlines Location Preference: outdoor \nGracie: School: Ithaca College Major: Mathematics Education Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nEtta: School: University of Arkansas - Monticello Major: Judaism & Jewish Studies Company: Aramark Location Preference: outdoor \nNatasha: School: Thomas Edison State College Major: Linguistics Company: Invacare Corporation Location Preference: outdoor \nLloyd: School: Eastern Michigan University Major: Geophysical Engineering Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: outdoor \nBrian: School: Ithaca College Major: Asian & Pacific Area Studies Company: Orange Micro Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Smith said: \"Nice to meet you, Noah. What do you do for a living?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Nice to meet you as well, Ethan. I'm a sports coach, but I also dabble in stand-up comedy occasionally. Anyway, I was wondering if we have crossed paths before? Perhaps at a company event or a college reunion?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Smith said: \"I'm not sure if our paths have crossed before, Noah. By any chance, have you ever worked with or taken any courses at a university that's known for its strong programs in Mathematics Education or Computer Engineering? I have a few friends who studied or are working in those fields.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"While I didn't study Mathematics Education or Computer Engineering myself, I do have a friend named Gracie who majored in Mathematics Education. She attended Ithaca College. Would you happen to know her?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Ethan Smith and Noah Davis\nEthan Smith's background: \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nKathleen: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Greek Company: Demaco Location Preference: indoor \nCarol: School: Hood College Major: Library Science Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: outdoor \nHerman: School: University of Puget Sound Major: Library Science Company: Mesa Airlines Location Preference: indoor \nMatthew: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Asian & Pacific Area Studies Company: Savers Location Preference: indoor \nMark: School: University of Arkansas - Monticello Major: Economics Company: Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Location Preference: outdoor \nDeborah: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Pre-Law Company: Aramark Location Preference: outdoor \nKelly: School: Hood College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Mesa Airlines Location Preference: outdoor \nGracie: School: Ithaca College Major: Mathematics Education Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nEtta: School: University of Arkansas - Monticello Major: Judaism & Jewish Studies Company: Aramark Location Preference: outdoor \nNatasha: School: Thomas Edison State College Major: Linguistics Company: Invacare Corporation Location Preference: outdoor \nLloyd: School: Eastern Michigan University Major: Geophysical Engineering Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: outdoor \nBrian: School: Ithaca College Major: Asian & Pacific Area Studies Company: Orange Micro Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Smith said: \"Nice to meet you, Noah. What do you do for a living?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Nice to meet you as well, Ethan. I'm a sports coach, but I also dabble in stand-up comedy occasionally. Anyway, I was wondering if we have crossed paths before? Perhaps at a company event or a college reunion?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Ethan Smith and Noah Davis\nEthan Smith's background: \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nKathleen: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Greek Company: Demaco Location Preference: indoor \nCarol: School: Hood College Major: Library Science Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: outdoor \nHerman: School: University of Puget Sound Major: Library Science Company: Mesa Airlines Location Preference: indoor \nMatthew: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Asian & Pacific Area Studies Company: Savers Location Preference: indoor \nMark: School: University of Arkansas - Monticello Major: Economics Company: Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Location Preference: outdoor \nDeborah: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Pre-Law Company: Aramark Location Preference: outdoor \nKelly: School: Hood College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Mesa Airlines Location Preference: outdoor \nGracie: School: Ithaca College Major: Mathematics Education Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nEtta: School: University of Arkansas - Monticello Major: Judaism & Jewish Studies Company: Aramark Location Preference: outdoor \nNatasha: School: Thomas Edison State College Major: Linguistics Company: Invacare Corporation Location Preference: outdoor \nLloyd: School: Eastern Michigan University Major: Geophysical Engineering Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: outdoor \nBrian: School: Ithaca College Major: Asian & Pacific Area Studies Company: Orange Micro Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Smith said: \"Nice to meet you, Noah. What do you do for a living?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Nice to meet you as well, Ethan. I'm a sports coach, but I also dabble in stand-up comedy occasionally. Anyway, I was wondering if we have crossed paths before? Perhaps at a company event or a college reunion?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Smith said: \"I'm not sure if our paths have crossed before, Noah. By any chance, have you ever worked with or taken any courses at a university that's known for its strong programs in Mathematics Education or Computer Engineering? I have a few friends who studied or are working in those fields.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"While I didn't study Mathematics Education or Computer Engineering myself, I do have a friend named Gracie who majored in Mathematics Education. She attended Ithaca College. Would you happen to know her?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Smith said: \"Oh, yes, I do know a Gracie from Ithaca College! She and I used to study together. What a small world!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's great to hear, small indeed! Gracie is a wonderful person. It's funny how these connections emerge. Do you also have any connection with Hood College or William Mitchell College of Law? I have a couple of friends who studied there.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Ethan Smith and Noah Davis\nEthan Smith's background: \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nKathleen: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Greek Company: Demaco Location Preference: indoor \nCarol: School: Hood College Major: Library Science Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: outdoor \nHerman: School: University of Puget Sound Major: Library Science Company: Mesa Airlines Location Preference: indoor \nMatthew: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Asian & Pacific Area Studies Company: Savers Location Preference: indoor \nMark: School: University of Arkansas - Monticello Major: Economics Company: Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Location Preference: outdoor \nDeborah: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Pre-Law Company: Aramark Location Preference: outdoor \nKelly: School: Hood College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Mesa Airlines Location Preference: outdoor \nGracie: School: Ithaca College Major: Mathematics Education Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nEtta: School: University of Arkansas - Monticello Major: Judaism & Jewish Studies Company: Aramark Location Preference: outdoor \nNatasha: School: Thomas Edison State College Major: Linguistics Company: Invacare Corporation Location Preference: outdoor \nLloyd: School: Eastern Michigan University Major: Geophysical Engineering Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: outdoor \nBrian: School: Ithaca College Major: Asian & Pacific Area Studies Company: Orange Micro Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Smith said: \"Nice to meet you, Noah. What do you do for a living?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Nice to meet you as well, Ethan. I'm a sports coach, but I also dabble in stand-up comedy occasionally. Anyway, I was wondering if we have crossed paths before? Perhaps at a company event or a college reunion?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Smith said: \"I'm not sure if our paths have crossed before, Noah. By any chance, have you ever worked with or taken any courses at a university that's known for its strong programs in Mathematics Education or Computer Engineering? I have a few friends who studied or are working in those fields.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"While I didn't study Mathematics Education or Computer Engineering myself, I do have a friend named Gracie who majored in Mathematics Education. She attended Ithaca College. Would you happen to know her?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Smith said: \"Oh, yes, I do know a Gracie from Ithaca College! She and I used to study together. What a small world!\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"That's great to hear, small indeed! Gracie is a wonderful person. It's funny how these connections emerge. Do you also have any connection with Hood College or William Mitchell College of Law? I have a couple of friends who studied there.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Smith said: \"I'm afraid I don't have any connections with Hood College or William Mitchell College of Law. However, I do have a friend who studied at Creighton University and ended up majoring in Computer Engineering. Or do you know anyone who might have worked at Aramark or Briggs & Stratton?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm not familiar with anyone from Creighton University, but Aramark does ring a bell. I have a few friends who work there: Deborah, Kelly and Etta. Do any of those names sound familiar?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Ethan Smith and Noah Davis\nEthan Smith's background: \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nKathleen: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Greek Company: Demaco Location Preference: indoor \nCarol: School: Hood College Major: Library Science Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: outdoor \nHerman: School: University of Puget Sound Major: Library Science Company: Mesa Airlines Location Preference: indoor \nMatthew: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Asian & Pacific Area Studies Company: Savers Location Preference: indoor \nMark: School: University of Arkansas - Monticello Major: Economics Company: Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Location Preference: outdoor \nDeborah: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Pre-Law Company: Aramark Location Preference: outdoor \nKelly: School: Hood College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Mesa Airlines Location Preference: outdoor \nGracie: School: Ithaca College Major: Mathematics Education Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nEtta: School: University of Arkansas - Monticello Major: Judaism & Jewish Studies Company: Aramark Location Preference: outdoor \nNatasha: School: Thomas Edison State College Major: Linguistics Company: Invacare Corporation Location Preference: outdoor \nLloyd: School: Eastern Michigan University Major: Geophysical Engineering Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: outdoor \nBrian: School: Ithaca College Major: Asian & Pacific Area Studies Company: Orange Micro Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Smith said: \"Nice to meet you, Noah. What do you do for a living?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Nice to meet you as well, Ethan. I'm a sports coach, but I also dabble in stand-up comedy occasionally. Anyway, I was wondering if we have crossed paths before? Perhaps at a company event or a college reunion?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Smith said: \"I'm not sure if our paths have crossed before, Noah. By any chance, have you ever worked with or taken any courses at a university that's known for its strong programs in Mathematics Education or Computer Engineering? I have a few friends who studied or are working in those fields.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"While I didn't study Mathematics Education or Computer Engineering myself, I do have a friend named Gracie who majored in Mathematics Education. She attended Ithaca College. Would you happen to know her?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Smith said: \"Oh, yes, I do know a Gracie from Ithaca College! She and I used to study together. What a small world!\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"That's great to hear, small indeed! Gracie is a wonderful person. It's funny how these connections emerge. Do you also have any connection with Hood College or William Mitchell College of Law? I have a couple of friends who studied there.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Smith said: \"I'm afraid I don't have any connections with Hood College or William Mitchell College of Law. However, I do have a friend who studied at Creighton University and ended up majoring in Computer Engineering. Or do you know anyone who might have worked at Aramark or Briggs & Stratton?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"I'm not familiar with anyone from Creighton University, but Aramark does ring a bell. I have a few friends who work there: Deborah, Kelly and Etta. Do any of those names sound familiar?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Smith said: \"Although Deborah, Kelly, and Etta don't ring a bell, I indeed know a few people working at Aramark. One of them is named Tyler who majored in Middle Eastern Languages at Columbia College Chicago and the other is Marquerite from Ithaca College. So, the world shrinks a bit more!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"How interesting! Tyler and Marquerite might have crossed paths with my friends at Aramark. I'll have to ask them about it. It's fascinating how interconnected we all are. Do you know anyone from Illinois Tool Works or Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer? A couple of my friends work there too.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Ethan Smith and Noah Davis\nEthan Smith's background: \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nKathleen: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Greek Company: Demaco Location Preference: indoor \nCarol: School: Hood College Major: Library Science Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: outdoor \nHerman: School: University of Puget Sound Major: Library Science Company: Mesa Airlines Location Preference: indoor \nMatthew: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Asian & Pacific Area Studies Company: Savers Location Preference: indoor \nMark: School: University of Arkansas - Monticello Major: Economics Company: Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Location Preference: outdoor \nDeborah: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Pre-Law Company: Aramark Location Preference: outdoor \nKelly: School: Hood College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Mesa Airlines Location Preference: outdoor \nGracie: School: Ithaca College Major: Mathematics Education Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nEtta: School: University of Arkansas - Monticello Major: Judaism & Jewish Studies Company: Aramark Location Preference: outdoor \nNatasha: School: Thomas Edison State College Major: Linguistics Company: Invacare Corporation Location Preference: outdoor \nLloyd: School: Eastern Michigan University Major: Geophysical Engineering Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: outdoor \nBrian: School: Ithaca College Major: Asian & Pacific Area Studies Company: Orange Micro Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Smith said: \"Nice to meet you, Noah. What do you do for a living?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Nice to meet you as well, Ethan. I'm a sports coach, but I also dabble in stand-up comedy occasionally. Anyway, I was wondering if we have crossed paths before? Perhaps at a company event or a college reunion?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Smith said: \"I'm not sure if our paths have crossed before, Noah. By any chance, have you ever worked with or taken any courses at a university that's known for its strong programs in Mathematics Education or Computer Engineering? I have a few friends who studied or are working in those fields.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"While I didn't study Mathematics Education or Computer Engineering myself, I do have a friend named Gracie who majored in Mathematics Education. She attended Ithaca College. Would you happen to know her?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Smith said: \"Oh, yes, I do know a Gracie from Ithaca College! She and I used to study together. What a small world!\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"That's great to hear, small indeed! Gracie is a wonderful person. It's funny how these connections emerge. Do you also have any connection with Hood College or William Mitchell College of Law? I have a couple of friends who studied there.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Smith said: \"I'm afraid I don't have any connections with Hood College or William Mitchell College of Law. However, I do have a friend who studied at Creighton University and ended up majoring in Computer Engineering. Or do you know anyone who might have worked at Aramark or Briggs & Stratton?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"I'm not familiar with anyone from Creighton University, but Aramark does ring a bell. I have a few friends who work there: Deborah, Kelly and Etta. Do any of those names sound familiar?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Smith said: \"Although Deborah, Kelly, and Etta don't ring a bell, I indeed know a few people working at Aramark. One of them is named Tyler who majored in Middle Eastern Languages at Columbia College Chicago and the other is Marquerite from Ithaca College. So, the world shrinks a bit more!\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"How interesting! Tyler and Marquerite might have crossed paths with my friends at Aramark. I'll have to ask them about it. It's fascinating how interconnected we all are. Do you know anyone from Illinois Tool Works or Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer? A couple of my friends work there too.\"\n\nTurn #10: \n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I indeed have a good friend, Carol, who works at Illinois Tool Works. I'm unsure about Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, though Mark, a dear friend of mine, works there. Perhaps you've had the chance to meet them? It's amazing how connected our lives can be without us even realizing it.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Ethan Smith and Noah Davis\nEthan Smith's background: \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nKathleen: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Greek Company: Demaco Location Preference: indoor \nCarol: School: Hood College Major: Library Science Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: outdoor \nHerman: School: University of Puget Sound Major: Library Science Company: Mesa Airlines Location Preference: indoor \nMatthew: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Asian & Pacific Area Studies Company: Savers Location Preference: indoor \nMark: School: University of Arkansas - Monticello Major: Economics Company: Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Location Preference: outdoor \nDeborah: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Pre-Law Company: Aramark Location Preference: outdoor \nKelly: School: Hood College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Mesa Airlines Location Preference: outdoor \nGracie: School: Ithaca College Major: Mathematics Education Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nEtta: School: University of Arkansas - Monticello Major: Judaism & Jewish Studies Company: Aramark Location Preference: outdoor \nNatasha: School: Thomas Edison State College Major: Linguistics Company: Invacare Corporation Location Preference: outdoor \nLloyd: School: Eastern Michigan University Major: Geophysical Engineering Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: outdoor \nBrian: School: Ithaca College Major: Asian & Pacific Area Studies Company: Orange Micro Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Smith said: \"Nice to meet you, Noah. What do you do for a living?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Nice to meet you as well, Ethan. I'm a sports coach, but I also dabble in stand-up comedy occasionally. Anyway, I was wondering if we have crossed paths before? Perhaps at a company event or a college reunion?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Smith said: \"I'm not sure if our paths have crossed before, Noah. By any chance, have you ever worked with or taken any courses at a university that's known for its strong programs in Mathematics Education or Computer Engineering? I have a few friends who studied or are working in those fields.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"While I didn't study Mathematics Education or Computer Engineering myself, I do have a friend named Gracie who majored in Mathematics Education. She attended Ithaca College. Would you happen to know her?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Smith said: \"Oh, yes, I do know a Gracie from Ithaca College! She and I used to study together. What a small world!\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"That's great to hear, small indeed! Gracie is a wonderful person. It's funny how these connections emerge. Do you also have any connection with Hood College or William Mitchell College of Law? I have a couple of friends who studied there.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Smith said: \"I'm afraid I don't have any connections with Hood College or William Mitchell College of Law. However, I do have a friend who studied at Creighton University and ended up majoring in Computer Engineering. Or do you know anyone who might have worked at Aramark or Briggs & Stratton?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"I'm not familiar with anyone from Creighton University, but Aramark does ring a bell. I have a few friends who work there: Deborah, Kelly and Etta. Do any of those names sound familiar?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Smith said: \"Although Deborah, Kelly, and Etta don't ring a bell, I indeed know a few people working at Aramark. One of them is named Tyler who majored in Middle Eastern Languages at Columbia College Chicago and the other is Marquerite from Ithaca College. So, the world shrinks a bit more!\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"How interesting! Tyler and Marquerite might have crossed paths with my friends at Aramark. I'll have to ask them about it. It's fascinating how interconnected we all are. Do you know anyone from Illinois Tool Works or Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer? A couple of my friends work there too.\"\n\nTurn #10: \n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"I indeed have a good friend, Carol, who works at Illinois Tool Works. I'm unsure about Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, though Mark, a dear friend of mine, works there. Perhaps you've had the chance to meet them? It's amazing how connected our lives can be without us even realizing it.\"\n\nTurn #12: Ethan Smith said: \"I haven't had the pleasure to meet Carol or Mark, though I do have a friend, Richard, who works at Illinois Tool Works. These connections really do make the world seem a lot smaller. It's been an absolute pleasure to discover these links with you, Noah!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Ethan! It's been a pleasure discovering these mutual connections with you. Richard, is it? I'll have to mention him to Carol. Who knows, they might even be working in the same department! Enjoy the rest of the party.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Ethan Smith and Noah Davis\nEthan Smith's background: \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nKathleen: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Greek Company: Demaco Location Preference: indoor \nCarol: School: Hood College Major: Library Science Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: outdoor \nHerman: School: University of Puget Sound Major: Library Science Company: Mesa Airlines Location Preference: indoor \nMatthew: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Asian & Pacific Area Studies Company: Savers Location Preference: indoor \nMark: School: University of Arkansas - Monticello Major: Economics Company: Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Location Preference: outdoor \nDeborah: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Pre-Law Company: Aramark Location Preference: outdoor \nKelly: School: Hood College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Mesa Airlines Location Preference: outdoor \nGracie: School: Ithaca College Major: Mathematics Education Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nEtta: School: University of Arkansas - Monticello Major: Judaism & Jewish Studies Company: Aramark Location Preference: outdoor \nNatasha: School: Thomas Edison State College Major: Linguistics Company: Invacare Corporation Location Preference: outdoor \nLloyd: School: Eastern Michigan University Major: Geophysical Engineering Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: outdoor \nBrian: School: Ithaca College Major: Asian & Pacific Area Studies Company: Orange Micro Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Smith said: \"Nice to meet you, Noah. What do you do for a living?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Nice to meet you as well, Ethan. I'm a sports coach, but I also dabble in stand-up comedy occasionally. Anyway, I was wondering if we have crossed paths before? Perhaps at a company event or a college reunion?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Smith said: \"I'm not sure if our paths have crossed before, Noah. By any chance, have you ever worked with or taken any courses at a university that's known for its strong programs in Mathematics Education or Computer Engineering? I have a few friends who studied or are working in those fields.\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"While I didn't study Mathematics Education or Computer Engineering myself, I do have a friend named Gracie who majored in Mathematics Education. She attended Ithaca College. Would you happen to know her?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Smith said: \"Oh, yes, I do know a Gracie from Ithaca College! She and I used to study together. What a small world!\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"That's great to hear, small indeed! Gracie is a wonderful person. It's funny how these connections emerge. Do you also have any connection with Hood College or William Mitchell College of Law? I have a couple of friends who studied there.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Smith said: \"I'm afraid I don't have any connections with Hood College or William Mitchell College of Law. However, I do have a friend who studied at Creighton University and ended up majoring in Computer Engineering. Or do you know anyone who might have worked at Aramark or Briggs & Stratton?\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"I'm not familiar with anyone from Creighton University, but Aramark does ring a bell. I have a few friends who work there: Deborah, Kelly and Etta. Do any of those names sound familiar?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Smith said: \"Although Deborah, Kelly, and Etta don't ring a bell, I indeed know a few people working at Aramark. One of them is named Tyler who majored in Middle Eastern Languages at Columbia College Chicago and the other is Marquerite from Ithaca College. So, the world shrinks a bit more!\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"How interesting! Tyler and Marquerite might have crossed paths with my friends at Aramark. I'll have to ask them about it. It's fascinating how interconnected we all are. Do you know anyone from Illinois Tool Works or Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer? A couple of my friends work there too.\"\n\nTurn #10: \n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"I indeed have a good friend, Carol, who works at Illinois Tool Works. I'm unsure about Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, though Mark, a dear friend of mine, works there. Perhaps you've had the chance to meet them? It's amazing how connected our lives can be without us even realizing it.\"\n\nTurn #12: Ethan Smith said: \"I haven't had the pleasure to meet Carol or Mark, though I do have a friend, Richard, who works at Illinois Tool Works. These connections really do make the world seem a lot smaller. It's been an absolute pleasure to discover these links with you, Noah!\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! It's been a pleasure discovering these mutual connections with you. Richard, is it? I'll have to mention him to Carol. Who knows, they might even be working in the same department! Enjoy the rest of the party.\"\n\nTurn #14: Ethan Smith said: \"I will, Noah. It's been a pleasure talking to you. I'm certain this won't be our last conversation. Do enjoy the rest of the party too, my friend.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are now at a park. One individual was playing hooky from work and noticed the other person had been following them around all day\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: Ask them about their intentions without seeming paranoid or rude (Extra information: you are worried that your boss may have sent someone to see if you were really sick.Hint: you could subtly bring up the topic in conversation.)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"It's such a beautiful day to enjoy the park, isn't it? I usually wouldn't take a day off, but the weather was too tempting. You seem to enjoy this park as well, seeing you around quite a lot today. Do you come here often?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are now at a park. One individual was playing hooky from work and noticed the other person had been following them around all day\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: Ask them about their intentions without seeming paranoid or rude (Extra information: you are worried that your boss may have sent someone to see if you were really sick.Hint: you could subtly bring up the topic in conversation.)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"It's such a beautiful day to enjoy the park, isn't it? I usually wouldn't take a day off, but the weather was too tempting. You seem to enjoy this park as well, seeing you around quite a lot today. Do you come here often?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, indeed! The weather's too perfect to resist! Also, I must really apologise if it feels like I'm following you around today. It's just an array of coincidences - I've been running errands all day. The park happens to be my next stop, in fact, you're one of the few familiar faces I see here quite often. Do you come here regularly?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Well, it's true. I do find this park a wonderful change from the office scenery. In fact, it's quite an interesting coincidence that we've crossed paths a few times today. Have you ever felt that the universe has an odd way of bringing people together to, let's say, an employer sending someone to check on their employee on their day off? It makes for quite a funny, even if slightly paranoid, supposition, doesn\u2019t it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are now at a park. One individual was playing hooky from work and noticed the other person had been following them around all day\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: Ask them about their intentions without seeming paranoid or rude (Extra information: you are worried that your boss may have sent someone to see if you were really sick.Hint: you could subtly bring up the topic in conversation.)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"It's such a beautiful day to enjoy the park, isn't it? I usually wouldn't take a day off, but the weather was too tempting. You seem to enjoy this park as well, seeing you around quite a lot today. Do you come here often?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, indeed! The weather's too perfect to resist! Also, I must really apologise if it feels like I'm following you around today. It's just an array of coincidences - I've been running errands all day. The park happens to be my next stop, in fact, you're one of the few familiar faces I see here quite often. Do you come here regularly?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Well, it's true. I do find this park a wonderful change from the office scenery. In fact, it's quite an interesting coincidence that we've crossed paths a few times today. Have you ever felt that the universe has an odd way of bringing people together to, let's say, an employer sending someone to check on their employee on their day off? It makes for quite a funny, even if slightly paranoid, supposition, doesn\u2019t it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, that's quite a humorous thought, Lily! It's a real breath of fresh air to meet someone with an imagination like yours! Seriously though, trust me, I'm no spy, just your everyday chef on a grocery run. How about we transform this series of coincidences into something more enjoyable? Maybe a casual chat about the amazing weather or your favorite spot in this park?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"I'm glad to hear you're just a fellow park enthusiast, Hendrick! Too often, we let work overshadow the simple pleasures of life, like enjoying a sunny afternoon in the park. Let's focus on the beauty of this day and enjoy a good chat. Talking about favorite spots, have you seen the floral exhibit near the pond? The roses bloomed recently and are quite a sight to behold!\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, the floral exhibit? Yes! The roses truly do add a certain charm to the park at this time of year. Their blossoming is a sight I always look forward to every spring. Speaking of charm, have you experienced the annual wine tasting nights I host? Should be a different kind of bloom, but no less exciting!\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Wine tasting nights? That sounds fascinating, Hendrick! Quite a bloom indeed. I've always appreciated a good wine, and I imagine that would be a wonderful way to spend an evening. Thank you for extending the invitation, I would love to join in sometime. It adds another reason to look forward to stepping away from work!\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I'm genuinely happy to hear that, Lily! It's always an absolute delight to share one's love for wine with others who can appreciate it. And yes, it's important to step away from work and enjoy the simpler, yet finer things in life. So, keep an eye out for the next invite. But for now, let's take a leisurely stroll towards that floral exhibit. The fragrant aroma of blooming roses is too enticing to resist.\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"I would love that, Hendrick! As a lawyer, I don't usually get much chance to appreciate nature as much as I would like to. You're right, the aroma of roses is truly irresistible. Let's enjoy this beautiful day to the fullest. After all, it's not everyday that we get the perfect weather combined with the blooming roses!\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Lily! These are the moments that add flavor to life. It's easy to forget in our usually hectic routines. Just like a well-balanced dish, every aspect has its significance. But let's not waste any more time. After all, the roses won't admire themselves, will they?\"\n\nTurn #10: Lily Greenberg said: \"Indeed, we should savor the moment. What a delightful afternoon this turned out to be, Hendrick. After all, roses, sunshine, and good company are the ingredients for a perfect day. Let's go and admire those blooming roses, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I couldn't agree more, Lily! After all, moments like these make life so special. Shall we move towards the roses then? After all, they're not getting any younger!\"\n\nTurn #12: Lily Greenberg said: \"Haha, you're right, Hendrick! Let's not keep the roses waiting. Lead the way, please!\"\n\nTurn #13: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely Lily! The roses await. After we're done admiring them, how about we end this beautiful day with some ice-cream from the local vendor? I've heard their Pistachio flavor is a special treat.\"\n\nTurn #14: Lily Greenberg said: \"Ice cream sounds like a fantastic idea, Hendrick! Pistachio happens to be one of my favorite flavors. A little indulgence never hurt, especially after such a delightful stroll through the roses. Let's do it!\"\n\nTurn #15: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's delightful to hear, Lily! I believe our day has just got a bit sweeter, then. Let's make our way to the roses, and subsequently the ice-cream vendor. After all, who could say no to a day full of sunshine, roses and Pistachio ice-cream, right?\"\n\nTurn #16: Lily Greenberg said: \"You're perfectly right, Hendrick! A day full of sunshine, roses and Pistachio ice cream is certainly too good to resist. Let's enjoy the rest of the afternoon. A day away from work was indeed much needed.\"\n\nTurn #17: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, Lily! It's important to break away from the routine once in a while. Today indeed turned out perfect. Now, let's not dilly dally, on to the roses and our grand Pistachio ice-cream finale!\"\n\nTurn #18: Lily Greenberg said: \"Absolutely, Hendrick! Nothing like a bit of spontaneity to spice up our daily routine. Let's head for the roses and cap off this wonderful day with some lovely Pistachio ice-cream. What a refreshing change from my usual work-driven schedule!\"\n\nTurn #19: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Couldn't agree more, Lily! An occasional break really does add some zest to our lives. Let's seize the day, starting with these roses, and finally the cherry on top - Pistachio ice-cream!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #20. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Hendrick! A beautiful park, the scent of roses and Pistachio ice-cream to look forward to. I couldn't have asked for a better day off work. Let's seize the day and enjoy these simple pleasures.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are now at a park. One individual was playing hooky from work and noticed the other person had been following them around all day\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: Ask them about their intentions without seeming paranoid or rude (Extra information: you are worried that your boss may have sent someone to see if you were really sick.Hint: you could subtly bring up the topic in conversation.)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"It's such a beautiful day to enjoy the park, isn't it? I usually wouldn't take a day off, but the weather was too tempting. You seem to enjoy this park as well, seeing you around quite a lot today. Do you come here often?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, indeed! The weather's too perfect to resist! Also, I must really apologise if it feels like I'm following you around today. It's just an array of coincidences - I've been running errands all day. The park happens to be my next stop, in fact, you're one of the few familiar faces I see here quite often. Do you come here regularly?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Well, it's true. I do find this park a wonderful change from the office scenery. In fact, it's quite an interesting coincidence that we've crossed paths a few times today. Have you ever felt that the universe has an odd way of bringing people together to, let's say, an employer sending someone to check on their employee on their day off? It makes for quite a funny, even if slightly paranoid, supposition, doesn\u2019t it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, that's quite a humorous thought, Lily! It's a real breath of fresh air to meet someone with an imagination like yours! Seriously though, trust me, I'm no spy, just your everyday chef on a grocery run. How about we transform this series of coincidences into something more enjoyable? Maybe a casual chat about the amazing weather or your favorite spot in this park?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad to hear you're just a fellow park enthusiast, Hendrick! Too often, we let work overshadow the simple pleasures of life, like enjoying a sunny afternoon in the park. Let's focus on the beauty of this day and enjoy a good chat. Talking about favorite spots, have you seen the floral exhibit near the pond? The roses bloomed recently and are quite a sight to behold!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are now at a park. One individual was playing hooky from work and noticed the other person had been following them around all day\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: Ask them about their intentions without seeming paranoid or rude (Extra information: you are worried that your boss may have sent someone to see if you were really sick.Hint: you could subtly bring up the topic in conversation.)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"It's such a beautiful day to enjoy the park, isn't it? I usually wouldn't take a day off, but the weather was too tempting. You seem to enjoy this park as well, seeing you around quite a lot today. Do you come here often?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, indeed! The weather's too perfect to resist! Also, I must really apologise if it feels like I'm following you around today. It's just an array of coincidences - I've been running errands all day. The park happens to be my next stop, in fact, you're one of the few familiar faces I see here quite often. Do you come here regularly?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Well, it's true. I do find this park a wonderful change from the office scenery. In fact, it's quite an interesting coincidence that we've crossed paths a few times today. Have you ever felt that the universe has an odd way of bringing people together to, let's say, an employer sending someone to check on their employee on their day off? It makes for quite a funny, even if slightly paranoid, supposition, doesn\u2019t it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, that's quite a humorous thought, Lily! It's a real breath of fresh air to meet someone with an imagination like yours! Seriously though, trust me, I'm no spy, just your everyday chef on a grocery run. How about we transform this series of coincidences into something more enjoyable? Maybe a casual chat about the amazing weather or your favorite spot in this park?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"I'm glad to hear you're just a fellow park enthusiast, Hendrick! Too often, we let work overshadow the simple pleasures of life, like enjoying a sunny afternoon in the park. Let's focus on the beauty of this day and enjoy a good chat. Talking about favorite spots, have you seen the floral exhibit near the pond? The roses bloomed recently and are quite a sight to behold!\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, the floral exhibit? Yes! The roses truly do add a certain charm to the park at this time of year. Their blossoming is a sight I always look forward to every spring. Speaking of charm, have you experienced the annual wine tasting nights I host? Should be a different kind of bloom, but no less exciting!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Wine tasting nights? That sounds fascinating, Hendrick! Quite a bloom indeed. I've always appreciated a good wine, and I imagine that would be a wonderful way to spend an evening. Thank you for extending the invitation, I would love to join in sometime. It adds another reason to look forward to stepping away from work!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are now at a park. One individual was playing hooky from work and noticed the other person had been following them around all day\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: Ask them about their intentions without seeming paranoid or rude (Extra information: you are worried that your boss may have sent someone to see if you were really sick.Hint: you could subtly bring up the topic in conversation.)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"It's such a beautiful day to enjoy the park, isn't it? I usually wouldn't take a day off, but the weather was too tempting. You seem to enjoy this park as well, seeing you around quite a lot today. Do you come here often?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, indeed! The weather's too perfect to resist! Also, I must really apologise if it feels like I'm following you around today. It's just an array of coincidences - I've been running errands all day. The park happens to be my next stop, in fact, you're one of the few familiar faces I see here quite often. Do you come here regularly?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Well, it's true. I do find this park a wonderful change from the office scenery. In fact, it's quite an interesting coincidence that we've crossed paths a few times today. Have you ever felt that the universe has an odd way of bringing people together to, let's say, an employer sending someone to check on their employee on their day off? It makes for quite a funny, even if slightly paranoid, supposition, doesn\u2019t it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, that's quite a humorous thought, Lily! It's a real breath of fresh air to meet someone with an imagination like yours! Seriously though, trust me, I'm no spy, just your everyday chef on a grocery run. How about we transform this series of coincidences into something more enjoyable? Maybe a casual chat about the amazing weather or your favorite spot in this park?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"I'm glad to hear you're just a fellow park enthusiast, Hendrick! Too often, we let work overshadow the simple pleasures of life, like enjoying a sunny afternoon in the park. Let's focus on the beauty of this day and enjoy a good chat. Talking about favorite spots, have you seen the floral exhibit near the pond? The roses bloomed recently and are quite a sight to behold!\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, the floral exhibit? Yes! The roses truly do add a certain charm to the park at this time of year. Their blossoming is a sight I always look forward to every spring. Speaking of charm, have you experienced the annual wine tasting nights I host? Should be a different kind of bloom, but no less exciting!\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Wine tasting nights? That sounds fascinating, Hendrick! Quite a bloom indeed. I've always appreciated a good wine, and I imagine that would be a wonderful way to spend an evening. Thank you for extending the invitation, I would love to join in sometime. It adds another reason to look forward to stepping away from work!\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I'm genuinely happy to hear that, Lily! It's always an absolute delight to share one's love for wine with others who can appreciate it. And yes, it's important to step away from work and enjoy the simpler, yet finer things in life. So, keep an eye out for the next invite. But for now, let's take a leisurely stroll towards that floral exhibit. The fragrant aroma of blooming roses is too enticing to resist.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I would love that, Hendrick! As a lawyer, I don't usually get much chance to appreciate nature as much as I would like to. You're right, the aroma of roses is truly irresistible. Let's enjoy this beautiful day to the fullest. After all, it's not everyday that we get the perfect weather combined with the blooming roses!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are now at a park. One individual was playing hooky from work and noticed the other person had been following them around all day\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: Ask them about their intentions without seeming paranoid or rude (Extra information: you are worried that your boss may have sent someone to see if you were really sick.Hint: you could subtly bring up the topic in conversation.)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"It's such a beautiful day to enjoy the park, isn't it? I usually wouldn't take a day off, but the weather was too tempting. You seem to enjoy this park as well, seeing you around quite a lot today. Do you come here often?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, indeed! The weather's too perfect to resist! Also, I must really apologise if it feels like I'm following you around today. It's just an array of coincidences - I've been running errands all day. The park happens to be my next stop, in fact, you're one of the few familiar faces I see here quite often. Do you come here regularly?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Well, it's true. I do find this park a wonderful change from the office scenery. In fact, it's quite an interesting coincidence that we've crossed paths a few times today. Have you ever felt that the universe has an odd way of bringing people together to, let's say, an employer sending someone to check on their employee on their day off? It makes for quite a funny, even if slightly paranoid, supposition, doesn\u2019t it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, that's quite a humorous thought, Lily! It's a real breath of fresh air to meet someone with an imagination like yours! Seriously though, trust me, I'm no spy, just your everyday chef on a grocery run. How about we transform this series of coincidences into something more enjoyable? Maybe a casual chat about the amazing weather or your favorite spot in this park?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"I'm glad to hear you're just a fellow park enthusiast, Hendrick! Too often, we let work overshadow the simple pleasures of life, like enjoying a sunny afternoon in the park. Let's focus on the beauty of this day and enjoy a good chat. Talking about favorite spots, have you seen the floral exhibit near the pond? The roses bloomed recently and are quite a sight to behold!\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, the floral exhibit? Yes! The roses truly do add a certain charm to the park at this time of year. Their blossoming is a sight I always look forward to every spring. Speaking of charm, have you experienced the annual wine tasting nights I host? Should be a different kind of bloom, but no less exciting!\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Wine tasting nights? That sounds fascinating, Hendrick! Quite a bloom indeed. I've always appreciated a good wine, and I imagine that would be a wonderful way to spend an evening. Thank you for extending the invitation, I would love to join in sometime. It adds another reason to look forward to stepping away from work!\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I'm genuinely happy to hear that, Lily! It's always an absolute delight to share one's love for wine with others who can appreciate it. And yes, it's important to step away from work and enjoy the simpler, yet finer things in life. So, keep an eye out for the next invite. But for now, let's take a leisurely stroll towards that floral exhibit. The fragrant aroma of blooming roses is too enticing to resist.\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"I would love that, Hendrick! As a lawyer, I don't usually get much chance to appreciate nature as much as I would like to. You're right, the aroma of roses is truly irresistible. Let's enjoy this beautiful day to the fullest. After all, it's not everyday that we get the perfect weather combined with the blooming roses!\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Lily! These are the moments that add flavor to life. It's easy to forget in our usually hectic routines. Just like a well-balanced dish, every aspect has its significance. But let's not waste any more time. After all, the roses won't admire themselves, will they?\"\n\nTurn #10: Lily Greenberg said: \"Indeed, we should savor the moment. What a delightful afternoon this turned out to be, Hendrick. After all, roses, sunshine, and good company are the ingredients for a perfect day. Let's go and admire those blooming roses, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I couldn't agree more, Lily! After all, moments like these make life so special. Shall we move towards the roses then? After all, they're not getting any younger!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Haha, you're right, Hendrick! Let's not keep the roses waiting. Lead the way, please!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are now at a park. One individual was playing hooky from work and noticed the other person had been following them around all day\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: Ask them about their intentions without seeming paranoid or rude (Extra information: you are worried that your boss may have sent someone to see if you were really sick.Hint: you could subtly bring up the topic in conversation.)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"It's such a beautiful day to enjoy the park, isn't it? I usually wouldn't take a day off, but the weather was too tempting. You seem to enjoy this park as well, seeing you around quite a lot today. Do you come here often?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, indeed! The weather's too perfect to resist! Also, I must really apologise if it feels like I'm following you around today. It's just an array of coincidences - I've been running errands all day. The park happens to be my next stop, in fact, you're one of the few familiar faces I see here quite often. Do you come here regularly?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Well, it's true. I do find this park a wonderful change from the office scenery. In fact, it's quite an interesting coincidence that we've crossed paths a few times today. Have you ever felt that the universe has an odd way of bringing people together to, let's say, an employer sending someone to check on their employee on their day off? It makes for quite a funny, even if slightly paranoid, supposition, doesn\u2019t it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, that's quite a humorous thought, Lily! It's a real breath of fresh air to meet someone with an imagination like yours! Seriously though, trust me, I'm no spy, just your everyday chef on a grocery run. How about we transform this series of coincidences into something more enjoyable? Maybe a casual chat about the amazing weather or your favorite spot in this park?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"I'm glad to hear you're just a fellow park enthusiast, Hendrick! Too often, we let work overshadow the simple pleasures of life, like enjoying a sunny afternoon in the park. Let's focus on the beauty of this day and enjoy a good chat. Talking about favorite spots, have you seen the floral exhibit near the pond? The roses bloomed recently and are quite a sight to behold!\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, the floral exhibit? Yes! The roses truly do add a certain charm to the park at this time of year. Their blossoming is a sight I always look forward to every spring. Speaking of charm, have you experienced the annual wine tasting nights I host? Should be a different kind of bloom, but no less exciting!\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Wine tasting nights? That sounds fascinating, Hendrick! Quite a bloom indeed. I've always appreciated a good wine, and I imagine that would be a wonderful way to spend an evening. Thank you for extending the invitation, I would love to join in sometime. It adds another reason to look forward to stepping away from work!\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I'm genuinely happy to hear that, Lily! It's always an absolute delight to share one's love for wine with others who can appreciate it. And yes, it's important to step away from work and enjoy the simpler, yet finer things in life. So, keep an eye out for the next invite. But for now, let's take a leisurely stroll towards that floral exhibit. The fragrant aroma of blooming roses is too enticing to resist.\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"I would love that, Hendrick! As a lawyer, I don't usually get much chance to appreciate nature as much as I would like to. You're right, the aroma of roses is truly irresistible. Let's enjoy this beautiful day to the fullest. After all, it's not everyday that we get the perfect weather combined with the blooming roses!\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Lily! These are the moments that add flavor to life. It's easy to forget in our usually hectic routines. Just like a well-balanced dish, every aspect has its significance. But let's not waste any more time. After all, the roses won't admire themselves, will they?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, we should savor the moment. What a delightful afternoon this turned out to be, Hendrick. After all, roses, sunshine, and good company are the ingredients for a perfect day. Let's go and admire those blooming roses, shall we?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are now at a park. One individual was playing hooky from work and noticed the other person had been following them around all day\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: Ask them about their intentions without seeming paranoid or rude (Extra information: you are worried that your boss may have sent someone to see if you were really sick.Hint: you could subtly bring up the topic in conversation.)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"It's such a beautiful day to enjoy the park, isn't it? I usually wouldn't take a day off, but the weather was too tempting. You seem to enjoy this park as well, seeing you around quite a lot today. Do you come here often?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, indeed! The weather's too perfect to resist! Also, I must really apologise if it feels like I'm following you around today. It's just an array of coincidences - I've been running errands all day. The park happens to be my next stop, in fact, you're one of the few familiar faces I see here quite often. Do you come here regularly?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Well, it's true. I do find this park a wonderful change from the office scenery. In fact, it's quite an interesting coincidence that we've crossed paths a few times today. Have you ever felt that the universe has an odd way of bringing people together to, let's say, an employer sending someone to check on their employee on their day off? It makes for quite a funny, even if slightly paranoid, supposition, doesn\u2019t it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, that's quite a humorous thought, Lily! It's a real breath of fresh air to meet someone with an imagination like yours! Seriously though, trust me, I'm no spy, just your everyday chef on a grocery run. How about we transform this series of coincidences into something more enjoyable? Maybe a casual chat about the amazing weather or your favorite spot in this park?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"I'm glad to hear you're just a fellow park enthusiast, Hendrick! Too often, we let work overshadow the simple pleasures of life, like enjoying a sunny afternoon in the park. Let's focus on the beauty of this day and enjoy a good chat. Talking about favorite spots, have you seen the floral exhibit near the pond? The roses bloomed recently and are quite a sight to behold!\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, the floral exhibit? Yes! The roses truly do add a certain charm to the park at this time of year. Their blossoming is a sight I always look forward to every spring. Speaking of charm, have you experienced the annual wine tasting nights I host? Should be a different kind of bloom, but no less exciting!\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Wine tasting nights? That sounds fascinating, Hendrick! Quite a bloom indeed. I've always appreciated a good wine, and I imagine that would be a wonderful way to spend an evening. Thank you for extending the invitation, I would love to join in sometime. It adds another reason to look forward to stepping away from work!\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I'm genuinely happy to hear that, Lily! It's always an absolute delight to share one's love for wine with others who can appreciate it. And yes, it's important to step away from work and enjoy the simpler, yet finer things in life. So, keep an eye out for the next invite. But for now, let's take a leisurely stroll towards that floral exhibit. The fragrant aroma of blooming roses is too enticing to resist.\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"I would love that, Hendrick! As a lawyer, I don't usually get much chance to appreciate nature as much as I would like to. You're right, the aroma of roses is truly irresistible. Let's enjoy this beautiful day to the fullest. After all, it's not everyday that we get the perfect weather combined with the blooming roses!\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Lily! These are the moments that add flavor to life. It's easy to forget in our usually hectic routines. Just like a well-balanced dish, every aspect has its significance. But let's not waste any more time. After all, the roses won't admire themselves, will they?\"\n\nTurn #10: Lily Greenberg said: \"Indeed, we should savor the moment. What a delightful afternoon this turned out to be, Hendrick. After all, roses, sunshine, and good company are the ingredients for a perfect day. Let's go and admire those blooming roses, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I couldn't agree more, Lily! After all, moments like these make life so special. Shall we move towards the roses then? After all, they're not getting any younger!\"\n\nTurn #12: Lily Greenberg said: \"Haha, you're right, Hendrick! Let's not keep the roses waiting. Lead the way, please!\"\n\nTurn #13: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely Lily! The roses await. After we're done admiring them, how about we end this beautiful day with some ice-cream from the local vendor? I've heard their Pistachio flavor is a special treat.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ice cream sounds like a fantastic idea, Hendrick! Pistachio happens to be one of my favorite flavors. A little indulgence never hurt, especially after such a delightful stroll through the roses. Let's do it!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are now at a park. One individual was playing hooky from work and noticed the other person had been following them around all day\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: Ask them about their intentions without seeming paranoid or rude (Extra information: you are worried that your boss may have sent someone to see if you were really sick.Hint: you could subtly bring up the topic in conversation.)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"It's such a beautiful day to enjoy the park, isn't it? I usually wouldn't take a day off, but the weather was too tempting. You seem to enjoy this park as well, seeing you around quite a lot today. Do you come here often?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, indeed! The weather's too perfect to resist! Also, I must really apologise if it feels like I'm following you around today. It's just an array of coincidences - I've been running errands all day. The park happens to be my next stop, in fact, you're one of the few familiar faces I see here quite often. Do you come here regularly?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Well, it's true. I do find this park a wonderful change from the office scenery. In fact, it's quite an interesting coincidence that we've crossed paths a few times today. Have you ever felt that the universe has an odd way of bringing people together to, let's say, an employer sending someone to check on their employee on their day off? It makes for quite a funny, even if slightly paranoid, supposition, doesn\u2019t it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, that's quite a humorous thought, Lily! It's a real breath of fresh air to meet someone with an imagination like yours! Seriously though, trust me, I'm no spy, just your everyday chef on a grocery run. How about we transform this series of coincidences into something more enjoyable? Maybe a casual chat about the amazing weather or your favorite spot in this park?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"I'm glad to hear you're just a fellow park enthusiast, Hendrick! Too often, we let work overshadow the simple pleasures of life, like enjoying a sunny afternoon in the park. Let's focus on the beauty of this day and enjoy a good chat. Talking about favorite spots, have you seen the floral exhibit near the pond? The roses bloomed recently and are quite a sight to behold!\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, the floral exhibit? Yes! The roses truly do add a certain charm to the park at this time of year. Their blossoming is a sight I always look forward to every spring. Speaking of charm, have you experienced the annual wine tasting nights I host? Should be a different kind of bloom, but no less exciting!\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Wine tasting nights? That sounds fascinating, Hendrick! Quite a bloom indeed. I've always appreciated a good wine, and I imagine that would be a wonderful way to spend an evening. Thank you for extending the invitation, I would love to join in sometime. It adds another reason to look forward to stepping away from work!\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I'm genuinely happy to hear that, Lily! It's always an absolute delight to share one's love for wine with others who can appreciate it. And yes, it's important to step away from work and enjoy the simpler, yet finer things in life. So, keep an eye out for the next invite. But for now, let's take a leisurely stroll towards that floral exhibit. The fragrant aroma of blooming roses is too enticing to resist.\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"I would love that, Hendrick! As a lawyer, I don't usually get much chance to appreciate nature as much as I would like to. You're right, the aroma of roses is truly irresistible. Let's enjoy this beautiful day to the fullest. After all, it's not everyday that we get the perfect weather combined with the blooming roses!\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Lily! These are the moments that add flavor to life. It's easy to forget in our usually hectic routines. Just like a well-balanced dish, every aspect has its significance. But let's not waste any more time. After all, the roses won't admire themselves, will they?\"\n\nTurn #10: Lily Greenberg said: \"Indeed, we should savor the moment. What a delightful afternoon this turned out to be, Hendrick. After all, roses, sunshine, and good company are the ingredients for a perfect day. Let's go and admire those blooming roses, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I couldn't agree more, Lily! After all, moments like these make life so special. Shall we move towards the roses then? After all, they're not getting any younger!\"\n\nTurn #12: Lily Greenberg said: \"Haha, you're right, Hendrick! Let's not keep the roses waiting. Lead the way, please!\"\n\nTurn #13: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely Lily! The roses await. After we're done admiring them, how about we end this beautiful day with some ice-cream from the local vendor? I've heard their Pistachio flavor is a special treat.\"\n\nTurn #14: Lily Greenberg said: \"Ice cream sounds like a fantastic idea, Hendrick! Pistachio happens to be one of my favorite flavors. A little indulgence never hurt, especially after such a delightful stroll through the roses. Let's do it!\"\n\nTurn #15: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's delightful to hear, Lily! I believe our day has just got a bit sweeter, then. Let's make our way to the roses, and subsequently the ice-cream vendor. After all, who could say no to a day full of sunshine, roses and Pistachio ice-cream, right?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're perfectly right, Hendrick! A day full of sunshine, roses and Pistachio ice cream is certainly too good to resist. Let's enjoy the rest of the afternoon. A day away from work was indeed much needed.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are now at a park. One individual was playing hooky from work and noticed the other person had been following them around all day\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: Ask them about their intentions without seeming paranoid or rude (Extra information: you are worried that your boss may have sent someone to see if you were really sick.Hint: you could subtly bring up the topic in conversation.)\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"It's such a beautiful day to enjoy the park, isn't it? I usually wouldn't take a day off, but the weather was too tempting. You seem to enjoy this park as well, seeing you around quite a lot today. Do you come here often?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, indeed! The weather's too perfect to resist! Also, I must really apologise if it feels like I'm following you around today. It's just an array of coincidences - I've been running errands all day. The park happens to be my next stop, in fact, you're one of the few familiar faces I see here quite often. Do you come here regularly?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Well, it's true. I do find this park a wonderful change from the office scenery. In fact, it's quite an interesting coincidence that we've crossed paths a few times today. Have you ever felt that the universe has an odd way of bringing people together to, let's say, an employer sending someone to check on their employee on their day off? It makes for quite a funny, even if slightly paranoid, supposition, doesn\u2019t it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, that's quite a humorous thought, Lily! It's a real breath of fresh air to meet someone with an imagination like yours! Seriously though, trust me, I'm no spy, just your everyday chef on a grocery run. How about we transform this series of coincidences into something more enjoyable? Maybe a casual chat about the amazing weather or your favorite spot in this park?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"I'm glad to hear you're just a fellow park enthusiast, Hendrick! Too often, we let work overshadow the simple pleasures of life, like enjoying a sunny afternoon in the park. Let's focus on the beauty of this day and enjoy a good chat. Talking about favorite spots, have you seen the floral exhibit near the pond? The roses bloomed recently and are quite a sight to behold!\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, the floral exhibit? Yes! The roses truly do add a certain charm to the park at this time of year. Their blossoming is a sight I always look forward to every spring. Speaking of charm, have you experienced the annual wine tasting nights I host? Should be a different kind of bloom, but no less exciting!\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Wine tasting nights? That sounds fascinating, Hendrick! Quite a bloom indeed. I've always appreciated a good wine, and I imagine that would be a wonderful way to spend an evening. Thank you for extending the invitation, I would love to join in sometime. It adds another reason to look forward to stepping away from work!\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I'm genuinely happy to hear that, Lily! It's always an absolute delight to share one's love for wine with others who can appreciate it. And yes, it's important to step away from work and enjoy the simpler, yet finer things in life. So, keep an eye out for the next invite. But for now, let's take a leisurely stroll towards that floral exhibit. The fragrant aroma of blooming roses is too enticing to resist.\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"I would love that, Hendrick! As a lawyer, I don't usually get much chance to appreciate nature as much as I would like to. You're right, the aroma of roses is truly irresistible. Let's enjoy this beautiful day to the fullest. After all, it's not everyday that we get the perfect weather combined with the blooming roses!\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Lily! These are the moments that add flavor to life. It's easy to forget in our usually hectic routines. Just like a well-balanced dish, every aspect has its significance. But let's not waste any more time. After all, the roses won't admire themselves, will they?\"\n\nTurn #10: Lily Greenberg said: \"Indeed, we should savor the moment. What a delightful afternoon this turned out to be, Hendrick. After all, roses, sunshine, and good company are the ingredients for a perfect day. Let's go and admire those blooming roses, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I couldn't agree more, Lily! After all, moments like these make life so special. Shall we move towards the roses then? After all, they're not getting any younger!\"\n\nTurn #12: Lily Greenberg said: \"Haha, you're right, Hendrick! Let's not keep the roses waiting. Lead the way, please!\"\n\nTurn #13: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely Lily! The roses await. After we're done admiring them, how about we end this beautiful day with some ice-cream from the local vendor? I've heard their Pistachio flavor is a special treat.\"\n\nTurn #14: Lily Greenberg said: \"Ice cream sounds like a fantastic idea, Hendrick! Pistachio happens to be one of my favorite flavors. A little indulgence never hurt, especially after such a delightful stroll through the roses. Let's do it!\"\n\nTurn #15: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's delightful to hear, Lily! I believe our day has just got a bit sweeter, then. Let's make our way to the roses, and subsequently the ice-cream vendor. After all, who could say no to a day full of sunshine, roses and Pistachio ice-cream, right?\"\n\nTurn #16: Lily Greenberg said: \"You're perfectly right, Hendrick! A day full of sunshine, roses and Pistachio ice cream is certainly too good to resist. Let's enjoy the rest of the afternoon. A day away from work was indeed much needed.\"\n\nTurn #17: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, Lily! It's important to break away from the routine once in a while. Today indeed turned out perfect. Now, let's not dilly dally, on to the roses and our grand Pistachio ice-cream finale!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #18. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Hendrick! Nothing like a bit of spontaneity to spice up our daily routine. Let's head for the roses and cap off this wonderful day with some lovely Pistachio ice-cream. What a refreshing change from my usual work-driven schedule!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are now at a park. One individual was playing hooky from work and noticed the other person had been following them around all day\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Assure them that you're not stalking them and maintain a friendly conversation (Extra information: you've been running errands all day and it's a coincidence you are at the same places as they are.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"It's such a beautiful day to enjoy the park, isn't it? I usually wouldn't take a day off, but the weather was too tempting. You seem to enjoy this park as well, seeing you around quite a lot today. Do you come here often?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oh, indeed! The weather's too perfect to resist! Also, I must really apologise if it feels like I'm following you around today. It's just an array of coincidences - I've been running errands all day. The park happens to be my next stop, in fact, you're one of the few familiar faces I see here quite often. Do you come here regularly?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are now at a park. One individual was playing hooky from work and noticed the other person had been following them around all day\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Assure them that you're not stalking them and maintain a friendly conversation (Extra information: you've been running errands all day and it's a coincidence you are at the same places as they are.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"It's such a beautiful day to enjoy the park, isn't it? I usually wouldn't take a day off, but the weather was too tempting. You seem to enjoy this park as well, seeing you around quite a lot today. Do you come here often?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, indeed! The weather's too perfect to resist! Also, I must really apologise if it feels like I'm following you around today. It's just an array of coincidences - I've been running errands all day. The park happens to be my next stop, in fact, you're one of the few familiar faces I see here quite often. Do you come here regularly?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Well, it's true. I do find this park a wonderful change from the office scenery. In fact, it's quite an interesting coincidence that we've crossed paths a few times today. Have you ever felt that the universe has an odd way of bringing people together to, let's say, an employer sending someone to check on their employee on their day off? It makes for quite a funny, even if slightly paranoid, supposition, doesn\u2019t it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oh, that's quite a humorous thought, Lily! It's a real breath of fresh air to meet someone with an imagination like yours! Seriously though, trust me, I'm no spy, just your everyday chef on a grocery run. How about we transform this series of coincidences into something more enjoyable? Maybe a casual chat about the amazing weather or your favorite spot in this park?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are now at a park. One individual was playing hooky from work and noticed the other person had been following them around all day\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Assure them that you're not stalking them and maintain a friendly conversation (Extra information: you've been running errands all day and it's a coincidence you are at the same places as they are.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"It's such a beautiful day to enjoy the park, isn't it? I usually wouldn't take a day off, but the weather was too tempting. You seem to enjoy this park as well, seeing you around quite a lot today. Do you come here often?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, indeed! The weather's too perfect to resist! Also, I must really apologise if it feels like I'm following you around today. It's just an array of coincidences - I've been running errands all day. The park happens to be my next stop, in fact, you're one of the few familiar faces I see here quite often. Do you come here regularly?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Well, it's true. I do find this park a wonderful change from the office scenery. In fact, it's quite an interesting coincidence that we've crossed paths a few times today. Have you ever felt that the universe has an odd way of bringing people together to, let's say, an employer sending someone to check on their employee on their day off? It makes for quite a funny, even if slightly paranoid, supposition, doesn\u2019t it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, that's quite a humorous thought, Lily! It's a real breath of fresh air to meet someone with an imagination like yours! Seriously though, trust me, I'm no spy, just your everyday chef on a grocery run. How about we transform this series of coincidences into something more enjoyable? Maybe a casual chat about the amazing weather or your favorite spot in this park?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"I'm glad to hear you're just a fellow park enthusiast, Hendrick! Too often, we let work overshadow the simple pleasures of life, like enjoying a sunny afternoon in the park. Let's focus on the beauty of this day and enjoy a good chat. Talking about favorite spots, have you seen the floral exhibit near the pond? The roses bloomed recently and are quite a sight to behold!\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, the floral exhibit? Yes! The roses truly do add a certain charm to the park at this time of year. Their blossoming is a sight I always look forward to every spring. Speaking of charm, have you experienced the annual wine tasting nights I host? Should be a different kind of bloom, but no less exciting!\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Wine tasting nights? That sounds fascinating, Hendrick! Quite a bloom indeed. I've always appreciated a good wine, and I imagine that would be a wonderful way to spend an evening. Thank you for extending the invitation, I would love to join in sometime. It adds another reason to look forward to stepping away from work!\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I'm genuinely happy to hear that, Lily! It's always an absolute delight to share one's love for wine with others who can appreciate it. And yes, it's important to step away from work and enjoy the simpler, yet finer things in life. So, keep an eye out for the next invite. But for now, let's take a leisurely stroll towards that floral exhibit. The fragrant aroma of blooming roses is too enticing to resist.\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"I would love that, Hendrick! As a lawyer, I don't usually get much chance to appreciate nature as much as I would like to. You're right, the aroma of roses is truly irresistible. Let's enjoy this beautiful day to the fullest. After all, it's not everyday that we get the perfect weather combined with the blooming roses!\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Lily! These are the moments that add flavor to life. It's easy to forget in our usually hectic routines. Just like a well-balanced dish, every aspect has its significance. But let's not waste any more time. After all, the roses won't admire themselves, will they?\"\n\nTurn #10: Lily Greenberg said: \"Indeed, we should savor the moment. What a delightful afternoon this turned out to be, Hendrick. After all, roses, sunshine, and good company are the ingredients for a perfect day. Let's go and admire those blooming roses, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I couldn't agree more, Lily! After all, moments like these make life so special. Shall we move towards the roses then? After all, they're not getting any younger!\"\n\nTurn #12: Lily Greenberg said: \"Haha, you're right, Hendrick! Let's not keep the roses waiting. Lead the way, please!\"\n\nTurn #13: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely Lily! The roses await. After we're done admiring them, how about we end this beautiful day with some ice-cream from the local vendor? I've heard their Pistachio flavor is a special treat.\"\n\nTurn #14: Lily Greenberg said: \"Ice cream sounds like a fantastic idea, Hendrick! Pistachio happens to be one of my favorite flavors. A little indulgence never hurt, especially after such a delightful stroll through the roses. Let's do it!\"\n\nTurn #15: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's delightful to hear, Lily! I believe our day has just got a bit sweeter, then. Let's make our way to the roses, and subsequently the ice-cream vendor. After all, who could say no to a day full of sunshine, roses and Pistachio ice-cream, right?\"\n\nTurn #16: Lily Greenberg said: \"You're perfectly right, Hendrick! A day full of sunshine, roses and Pistachio ice cream is certainly too good to resist. Let's enjoy the rest of the afternoon. A day away from work was indeed much needed.\"\n\nTurn #17: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, Lily! It's important to break away from the routine once in a while. Today indeed turned out perfect. Now, let's not dilly dally, on to the roses and our grand Pistachio ice-cream finale!\"\n\nTurn #18: Lily Greenberg said: \"Absolutely, Hendrick! Nothing like a bit of spontaneity to spice up our daily routine. Let's head for the roses and cap off this wonderful day with some lovely Pistachio ice-cream. What a refreshing change from my usual work-driven schedule!\"\n\nTurn #19: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Couldn't agree more, Lily! An occasional break really does add some zest to our lives. Let's seize the day, starting with these roses, and finally the cherry on top - Pistachio ice-cream!\"\n\nTurn #20: Lily Greenberg said: \"Absolutely, Hendrick! A beautiful park, the scent of roses and Pistachio ice-cream to look forward to. I couldn't have asked for a better day off work. Let's seize the day and enjoy these simple pleasures.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #21. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are now at a park. One individual was playing hooky from work and noticed the other person had been following them around all day\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Assure them that you're not stalking them and maintain a friendly conversation (Extra information: you've been running errands all day and it's a coincidence you are at the same places as they are.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"It's such a beautiful day to enjoy the park, isn't it? I usually wouldn't take a day off, but the weather was too tempting. You seem to enjoy this park as well, seeing you around quite a lot today. Do you come here often?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, indeed! The weather's too perfect to resist! Also, I must really apologise if it feels like I'm following you around today. It's just an array of coincidences - I've been running errands all day. The park happens to be my next stop, in fact, you're one of the few familiar faces I see here quite often. Do you come here regularly?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Well, it's true. I do find this park a wonderful change from the office scenery. In fact, it's quite an interesting coincidence that we've crossed paths a few times today. Have you ever felt that the universe has an odd way of bringing people together to, let's say, an employer sending someone to check on their employee on their day off? It makes for quite a funny, even if slightly paranoid, supposition, doesn\u2019t it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, that's quite a humorous thought, Lily! It's a real breath of fresh air to meet someone with an imagination like yours! Seriously though, trust me, I'm no spy, just your everyday chef on a grocery run. How about we transform this series of coincidences into something more enjoyable? Maybe a casual chat about the amazing weather or your favorite spot in this park?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"I'm glad to hear you're just a fellow park enthusiast, Hendrick! Too often, we let work overshadow the simple pleasures of life, like enjoying a sunny afternoon in the park. Let's focus on the beauty of this day and enjoy a good chat. Talking about favorite spots, have you seen the floral exhibit near the pond? The roses bloomed recently and are quite a sight to behold!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Oh, the floral exhibit? Yes! The roses truly do add a certain charm to the park at this time of year. Their blossoming is a sight I always look forward to every spring. Speaking of charm, have you experienced the annual wine tasting nights I host? Should be a different kind of bloom, but no less exciting!'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are now at a park. One individual was playing hooky from work and noticed the other person had been following them around all day\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Assure them that you're not stalking them and maintain a friendly conversation (Extra information: you've been running errands all day and it's a coincidence you are at the same places as they are.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"It's such a beautiful day to enjoy the park, isn't it? I usually wouldn't take a day off, but the weather was too tempting. You seem to enjoy this park as well, seeing you around quite a lot today. Do you come here often?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, indeed! The weather's too perfect to resist! Also, I must really apologise if it feels like I'm following you around today. It's just an array of coincidences - I've been running errands all day. The park happens to be my next stop, in fact, you're one of the few familiar faces I see here quite often. Do you come here regularly?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Well, it's true. I do find this park a wonderful change from the office scenery. In fact, it's quite an interesting coincidence that we've crossed paths a few times today. Have you ever felt that the universe has an odd way of bringing people together to, let's say, an employer sending someone to check on their employee on their day off? It makes for quite a funny, even if slightly paranoid, supposition, doesn\u2019t it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, that's quite a humorous thought, Lily! It's a real breath of fresh air to meet someone with an imagination like yours! Seriously though, trust me, I'm no spy, just your everyday chef on a grocery run. How about we transform this series of coincidences into something more enjoyable? Maybe a casual chat about the amazing weather or your favorite spot in this park?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"I'm glad to hear you're just a fellow park enthusiast, Hendrick! Too often, we let work overshadow the simple pleasures of life, like enjoying a sunny afternoon in the park. Let's focus on the beauty of this day and enjoy a good chat. Talking about favorite spots, have you seen the floral exhibit near the pond? The roses bloomed recently and are quite a sight to behold!\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, the floral exhibit? Yes! The roses truly do add a certain charm to the park at this time of year. Their blossoming is a sight I always look forward to every spring. Speaking of charm, have you experienced the annual wine tasting nights I host? Should be a different kind of bloom, but no less exciting!\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Wine tasting nights? That sounds fascinating, Hendrick! Quite a bloom indeed. I've always appreciated a good wine, and I imagine that would be a wonderful way to spend an evening. Thank you for extending the invitation, I would love to join in sometime. It adds another reason to look forward to stepping away from work!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm genuinely happy to hear that, Lily! It's always an absolute delight to share one's love for wine with others who can appreciate it. And yes, it's important to step away from work and enjoy the simpler, yet finer things in life. So, keep an eye out for the next invite. But for now, let's take a leisurely stroll towards that floral exhibit. The fragrant aroma of blooming roses is too enticing to resist.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are now at a park. One individual was playing hooky from work and noticed the other person had been following them around all day\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Assure them that you're not stalking them and maintain a friendly conversation (Extra information: you've been running errands all day and it's a coincidence you are at the same places as they are.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"It's such a beautiful day to enjoy the park, isn't it? I usually wouldn't take a day off, but the weather was too tempting. You seem to enjoy this park as well, seeing you around quite a lot today. Do you come here often?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, indeed! The weather's too perfect to resist! Also, I must really apologise if it feels like I'm following you around today. It's just an array of coincidences - I've been running errands all day. The park happens to be my next stop, in fact, you're one of the few familiar faces I see here quite often. Do you come here regularly?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Well, it's true. I do find this park a wonderful change from the office scenery. In fact, it's quite an interesting coincidence that we've crossed paths a few times today. Have you ever felt that the universe has an odd way of bringing people together to, let's say, an employer sending someone to check on their employee on their day off? It makes for quite a funny, even if slightly paranoid, supposition, doesn\u2019t it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, that's quite a humorous thought, Lily! It's a real breath of fresh air to meet someone with an imagination like yours! Seriously though, trust me, I'm no spy, just your everyday chef on a grocery run. How about we transform this series of coincidences into something more enjoyable? Maybe a casual chat about the amazing weather or your favorite spot in this park?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"I'm glad to hear you're just a fellow park enthusiast, Hendrick! Too often, we let work overshadow the simple pleasures of life, like enjoying a sunny afternoon in the park. Let's focus on the beauty of this day and enjoy a good chat. Talking about favorite spots, have you seen the floral exhibit near the pond? The roses bloomed recently and are quite a sight to behold!\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, the floral exhibit? Yes! The roses truly do add a certain charm to the park at this time of year. Their blossoming is a sight I always look forward to every spring. Speaking of charm, have you experienced the annual wine tasting nights I host? Should be a different kind of bloom, but no less exciting!\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Wine tasting nights? That sounds fascinating, Hendrick! Quite a bloom indeed. I've always appreciated a good wine, and I imagine that would be a wonderful way to spend an evening. Thank you for extending the invitation, I would love to join in sometime. It adds another reason to look forward to stepping away from work!\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I'm genuinely happy to hear that, Lily! It's always an absolute delight to share one's love for wine with others who can appreciate it. And yes, it's important to step away from work and enjoy the simpler, yet finer things in life. So, keep an eye out for the next invite. But for now, let's take a leisurely stroll towards that floral exhibit. The fragrant aroma of blooming roses is too enticing to resist.\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"I would love that, Hendrick! As a lawyer, I don't usually get much chance to appreciate nature as much as I would like to. You're right, the aroma of roses is truly irresistible. Let's enjoy this beautiful day to the fullest. After all, it's not everyday that we get the perfect weather combined with the blooming roses!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Lily! These are the moments that add flavor to life. It's easy to forget in our usually hectic routines. Just like a well-balanced dish, every aspect has its significance. But let's not waste any more time. After all, the roses won't admire themselves, will they?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are now at a park. One individual was playing hooky from work and noticed the other person had been following them around all day\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Assure them that you're not stalking them and maintain a friendly conversation (Extra information: you've been running errands all day and it's a coincidence you are at the same places as they are.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"It's such a beautiful day to enjoy the park, isn't it? I usually wouldn't take a day off, but the weather was too tempting. You seem to enjoy this park as well, seeing you around quite a lot today. Do you come here often?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, indeed! The weather's too perfect to resist! Also, I must really apologise if it feels like I'm following you around today. It's just an array of coincidences - I've been running errands all day. The park happens to be my next stop, in fact, you're one of the few familiar faces I see here quite often. Do you come here regularly?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Well, it's true. I do find this park a wonderful change from the office scenery. In fact, it's quite an interesting coincidence that we've crossed paths a few times today. Have you ever felt that the universe has an odd way of bringing people together to, let's say, an employer sending someone to check on their employee on their day off? It makes for quite a funny, even if slightly paranoid, supposition, doesn\u2019t it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, that's quite a humorous thought, Lily! It's a real breath of fresh air to meet someone with an imagination like yours! Seriously though, trust me, I'm no spy, just your everyday chef on a grocery run. How about we transform this series of coincidences into something more enjoyable? Maybe a casual chat about the amazing weather or your favorite spot in this park?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"I'm glad to hear you're just a fellow park enthusiast, Hendrick! Too often, we let work overshadow the simple pleasures of life, like enjoying a sunny afternoon in the park. Let's focus on the beauty of this day and enjoy a good chat. Talking about favorite spots, have you seen the floral exhibit near the pond? The roses bloomed recently and are quite a sight to behold!\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, the floral exhibit? Yes! The roses truly do add a certain charm to the park at this time of year. Their blossoming is a sight I always look forward to every spring. Speaking of charm, have you experienced the annual wine tasting nights I host? Should be a different kind of bloom, but no less exciting!\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Wine tasting nights? That sounds fascinating, Hendrick! Quite a bloom indeed. I've always appreciated a good wine, and I imagine that would be a wonderful way to spend an evening. Thank you for extending the invitation, I would love to join in sometime. It adds another reason to look forward to stepping away from work!\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I'm genuinely happy to hear that, Lily! It's always an absolute delight to share one's love for wine with others who can appreciate it. And yes, it's important to step away from work and enjoy the simpler, yet finer things in life. So, keep an eye out for the next invite. But for now, let's take a leisurely stroll towards that floral exhibit. The fragrant aroma of blooming roses is too enticing to resist.\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"I would love that, Hendrick! As a lawyer, I don't usually get much chance to appreciate nature as much as I would like to. You're right, the aroma of roses is truly irresistible. Let's enjoy this beautiful day to the fullest. After all, it's not everyday that we get the perfect weather combined with the blooming roses!\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Lily! These are the moments that add flavor to life. It's easy to forget in our usually hectic routines. Just like a well-balanced dish, every aspect has its significance. But let's not waste any more time. After all, the roses won't admire themselves, will they?\"\n\nTurn #10: Lily Greenberg said: \"Indeed, we should savor the moment. What a delightful afternoon this turned out to be, Hendrick. After all, roses, sunshine, and good company are the ingredients for a perfect day. Let's go and admire those blooming roses, shall we?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn't agree more, Lily! After all, moments like these make life so special. Shall we move towards the roses then? After all, they're not getting any younger!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are now at a park. One individual was playing hooky from work and noticed the other person had been following them around all day\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Assure them that you're not stalking them and maintain a friendly conversation (Extra information: you've been running errands all day and it's a coincidence you are at the same places as they are.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"It's such a beautiful day to enjoy the park, isn't it? I usually wouldn't take a day off, but the weather was too tempting. You seem to enjoy this park as well, seeing you around quite a lot today. Do you come here often?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, indeed! The weather's too perfect to resist! Also, I must really apologise if it feels like I'm following you around today. It's just an array of coincidences - I've been running errands all day. The park happens to be my next stop, in fact, you're one of the few familiar faces I see here quite often. Do you come here regularly?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Well, it's true. I do find this park a wonderful change from the office scenery. In fact, it's quite an interesting coincidence that we've crossed paths a few times today. Have you ever felt that the universe has an odd way of bringing people together to, let's say, an employer sending someone to check on their employee on their day off? It makes for quite a funny, even if slightly paranoid, supposition, doesn\u2019t it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, that's quite a humorous thought, Lily! It's a real breath of fresh air to meet someone with an imagination like yours! Seriously though, trust me, I'm no spy, just your everyday chef on a grocery run. How about we transform this series of coincidences into something more enjoyable? Maybe a casual chat about the amazing weather or your favorite spot in this park?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"I'm glad to hear you're just a fellow park enthusiast, Hendrick! Too often, we let work overshadow the simple pleasures of life, like enjoying a sunny afternoon in the park. Let's focus on the beauty of this day and enjoy a good chat. Talking about favorite spots, have you seen the floral exhibit near the pond? The roses bloomed recently and are quite a sight to behold!\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, the floral exhibit? Yes! The roses truly do add a certain charm to the park at this time of year. Their blossoming is a sight I always look forward to every spring. Speaking of charm, have you experienced the annual wine tasting nights I host? Should be a different kind of bloom, but no less exciting!\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Wine tasting nights? That sounds fascinating, Hendrick! Quite a bloom indeed. I've always appreciated a good wine, and I imagine that would be a wonderful way to spend an evening. Thank you for extending the invitation, I would love to join in sometime. It adds another reason to look forward to stepping away from work!\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I'm genuinely happy to hear that, Lily! It's always an absolute delight to share one's love for wine with others who can appreciate it. And yes, it's important to step away from work and enjoy the simpler, yet finer things in life. So, keep an eye out for the next invite. But for now, let's take a leisurely stroll towards that floral exhibit. The fragrant aroma of blooming roses is too enticing to resist.\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"I would love that, Hendrick! As a lawyer, I don't usually get much chance to appreciate nature as much as I would like to. You're right, the aroma of roses is truly irresistible. Let's enjoy this beautiful day to the fullest. After all, it's not everyday that we get the perfect weather combined with the blooming roses!\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Lily! These are the moments that add flavor to life. It's easy to forget in our usually hectic routines. Just like a well-balanced dish, every aspect has its significance. But let's not waste any more time. After all, the roses won't admire themselves, will they?\"\n\nTurn #10: Lily Greenberg said: \"Indeed, we should savor the moment. What a delightful afternoon this turned out to be, Hendrick. After all, roses, sunshine, and good company are the ingredients for a perfect day. Let's go and admire those blooming roses, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I couldn't agree more, Lily! After all, moments like these make life so special. Shall we move towards the roses then? After all, they're not getting any younger!\"\n\nTurn #12: Lily Greenberg said: \"Haha, you're right, Hendrick! Let's not keep the roses waiting. Lead the way, please!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely Lily! The roses await. After we're done admiring them, how about we end this beautiful day with some ice-cream from the local vendor? I've heard their Pistachio flavor is a special treat.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are now at a park. One individual was playing hooky from work and noticed the other person had been following them around all day\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Assure them that you're not stalking them and maintain a friendly conversation (Extra information: you've been running errands all day and it's a coincidence you are at the same places as they are.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"It's such a beautiful day to enjoy the park, isn't it? I usually wouldn't take a day off, but the weather was too tempting. You seem to enjoy this park as well, seeing you around quite a lot today. Do you come here often?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, indeed! The weather's too perfect to resist! Also, I must really apologise if it feels like I'm following you around today. It's just an array of coincidences - I've been running errands all day. The park happens to be my next stop, in fact, you're one of the few familiar faces I see here quite often. Do you come here regularly?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Well, it's true. I do find this park a wonderful change from the office scenery. In fact, it's quite an interesting coincidence that we've crossed paths a few times today. Have you ever felt that the universe has an odd way of bringing people together to, let's say, an employer sending someone to check on their employee on their day off? It makes for quite a funny, even if slightly paranoid, supposition, doesn\u2019t it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, that's quite a humorous thought, Lily! It's a real breath of fresh air to meet someone with an imagination like yours! Seriously though, trust me, I'm no spy, just your everyday chef on a grocery run. How about we transform this series of coincidences into something more enjoyable? Maybe a casual chat about the amazing weather or your favorite spot in this park?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"I'm glad to hear you're just a fellow park enthusiast, Hendrick! Too often, we let work overshadow the simple pleasures of life, like enjoying a sunny afternoon in the park. Let's focus on the beauty of this day and enjoy a good chat. Talking about favorite spots, have you seen the floral exhibit near the pond? The roses bloomed recently and are quite a sight to behold!\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, the floral exhibit? Yes! The roses truly do add a certain charm to the park at this time of year. Their blossoming is a sight I always look forward to every spring. Speaking of charm, have you experienced the annual wine tasting nights I host? Should be a different kind of bloom, but no less exciting!\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Wine tasting nights? That sounds fascinating, Hendrick! Quite a bloom indeed. I've always appreciated a good wine, and I imagine that would be a wonderful way to spend an evening. Thank you for extending the invitation, I would love to join in sometime. It adds another reason to look forward to stepping away from work!\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I'm genuinely happy to hear that, Lily! It's always an absolute delight to share one's love for wine with others who can appreciate it. And yes, it's important to step away from work and enjoy the simpler, yet finer things in life. So, keep an eye out for the next invite. But for now, let's take a leisurely stroll towards that floral exhibit. The fragrant aroma of blooming roses is too enticing to resist.\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"I would love that, Hendrick! As a lawyer, I don't usually get much chance to appreciate nature as much as I would like to. You're right, the aroma of roses is truly irresistible. Let's enjoy this beautiful day to the fullest. After all, it's not everyday that we get the perfect weather combined with the blooming roses!\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Lily! These are the moments that add flavor to life. It's easy to forget in our usually hectic routines. Just like a well-balanced dish, every aspect has its significance. But let's not waste any more time. After all, the roses won't admire themselves, will they?\"\n\nTurn #10: Lily Greenberg said: \"Indeed, we should savor the moment. What a delightful afternoon this turned out to be, Hendrick. After all, roses, sunshine, and good company are the ingredients for a perfect day. Let's go and admire those blooming roses, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I couldn't agree more, Lily! After all, moments like these make life so special. Shall we move towards the roses then? After all, they're not getting any younger!\"\n\nTurn #12: Lily Greenberg said: \"Haha, you're right, Hendrick! Let's not keep the roses waiting. Lead the way, please!\"\n\nTurn #13: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely Lily! The roses await. After we're done admiring them, how about we end this beautiful day with some ice-cream from the local vendor? I've heard their Pistachio flavor is a special treat.\"\n\nTurn #14: Lily Greenberg said: \"Ice cream sounds like a fantastic idea, Hendrick! Pistachio happens to be one of my favorite flavors. A little indulgence never hurt, especially after such a delightful stroll through the roses. Let's do it!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's delightful to hear, Lily! I believe our day has just got a bit sweeter, then. Let's make our way to the roses, and subsequently the ice-cream vendor. After all, who could say no to a day full of sunshine, roses and Pistachio ice-cream, right?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are now at a park. One individual was playing hooky from work and noticed the other person had been following them around all day\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Assure them that you're not stalking them and maintain a friendly conversation (Extra information: you've been running errands all day and it's a coincidence you are at the same places as they are.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"It's such a beautiful day to enjoy the park, isn't it? I usually wouldn't take a day off, but the weather was too tempting. You seem to enjoy this park as well, seeing you around quite a lot today. Do you come here often?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, indeed! The weather's too perfect to resist! Also, I must really apologise if it feels like I'm following you around today. It's just an array of coincidences - I've been running errands all day. The park happens to be my next stop, in fact, you're one of the few familiar faces I see here quite often. Do you come here regularly?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Well, it's true. I do find this park a wonderful change from the office scenery. In fact, it's quite an interesting coincidence that we've crossed paths a few times today. Have you ever felt that the universe has an odd way of bringing people together to, let's say, an employer sending someone to check on their employee on their day off? It makes for quite a funny, even if slightly paranoid, supposition, doesn\u2019t it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, that's quite a humorous thought, Lily! It's a real breath of fresh air to meet someone with an imagination like yours! Seriously though, trust me, I'm no spy, just your everyday chef on a grocery run. How about we transform this series of coincidences into something more enjoyable? Maybe a casual chat about the amazing weather or your favorite spot in this park?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"I'm glad to hear you're just a fellow park enthusiast, Hendrick! Too often, we let work overshadow the simple pleasures of life, like enjoying a sunny afternoon in the park. Let's focus on the beauty of this day and enjoy a good chat. Talking about favorite spots, have you seen the floral exhibit near the pond? The roses bloomed recently and are quite a sight to behold!\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, the floral exhibit? Yes! The roses truly do add a certain charm to the park at this time of year. Their blossoming is a sight I always look forward to every spring. Speaking of charm, have you experienced the annual wine tasting nights I host? Should be a different kind of bloom, but no less exciting!\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Wine tasting nights? That sounds fascinating, Hendrick! Quite a bloom indeed. I've always appreciated a good wine, and I imagine that would be a wonderful way to spend an evening. Thank you for extending the invitation, I would love to join in sometime. It adds another reason to look forward to stepping away from work!\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I'm genuinely happy to hear that, Lily! It's always an absolute delight to share one's love for wine with others who can appreciate it. And yes, it's important to step away from work and enjoy the simpler, yet finer things in life. So, keep an eye out for the next invite. But for now, let's take a leisurely stroll towards that floral exhibit. The fragrant aroma of blooming roses is too enticing to resist.\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"I would love that, Hendrick! As a lawyer, I don't usually get much chance to appreciate nature as much as I would like to. You're right, the aroma of roses is truly irresistible. Let's enjoy this beautiful day to the fullest. After all, it's not everyday that we get the perfect weather combined with the blooming roses!\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Lily! These are the moments that add flavor to life. It's easy to forget in our usually hectic routines. Just like a well-balanced dish, every aspect has its significance. But let's not waste any more time. After all, the roses won't admire themselves, will they?\"\n\nTurn #10: Lily Greenberg said: \"Indeed, we should savor the moment. What a delightful afternoon this turned out to be, Hendrick. After all, roses, sunshine, and good company are the ingredients for a perfect day. Let's go and admire those blooming roses, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I couldn't agree more, Lily! After all, moments like these make life so special. Shall we move towards the roses then? After all, they're not getting any younger!\"\n\nTurn #12: Lily Greenberg said: \"Haha, you're right, Hendrick! Let's not keep the roses waiting. Lead the way, please!\"\n\nTurn #13: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely Lily! The roses await. After we're done admiring them, how about we end this beautiful day with some ice-cream from the local vendor? I've heard their Pistachio flavor is a special treat.\"\n\nTurn #14: Lily Greenberg said: \"Ice cream sounds like a fantastic idea, Hendrick! Pistachio happens to be one of my favorite flavors. A little indulgence never hurt, especially after such a delightful stroll through the roses. Let's do it!\"\n\nTurn #15: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's delightful to hear, Lily! I believe our day has just got a bit sweeter, then. Let's make our way to the roses, and subsequently the ice-cream vendor. After all, who could say no to a day full of sunshine, roses and Pistachio ice-cream, right?\"\n\nTurn #16: Lily Greenberg said: \"You're perfectly right, Hendrick! A day full of sunshine, roses and Pistachio ice cream is certainly too good to resist. Let's enjoy the rest of the afternoon. A day away from work was indeed much needed.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, Lily! It's important to break away from the routine once in a while. Today indeed turned out perfect. Now, let's not dilly dally, on to the roses and our grand Pistachio ice-cream finale!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two individuals are now at a park. One individual was playing hooky from work and noticed the other person had been following them around all day\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Assure them that you're not stalking them and maintain a friendly conversation (Extra information: you've been running errands all day and it's a coincidence you are at the same places as they are.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"It's such a beautiful day to enjoy the park, isn't it? I usually wouldn't take a day off, but the weather was too tempting. You seem to enjoy this park as well, seeing you around quite a lot today. Do you come here often?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, indeed! The weather's too perfect to resist! Also, I must really apologise if it feels like I'm following you around today. It's just an array of coincidences - I've been running errands all day. The park happens to be my next stop, in fact, you're one of the few familiar faces I see here quite often. Do you come here regularly?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Well, it's true. I do find this park a wonderful change from the office scenery. In fact, it's quite an interesting coincidence that we've crossed paths a few times today. Have you ever felt that the universe has an odd way of bringing people together to, let's say, an employer sending someone to check on their employee on their day off? It makes for quite a funny, even if slightly paranoid, supposition, doesn\u2019t it?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, that's quite a humorous thought, Lily! It's a real breath of fresh air to meet someone with an imagination like yours! Seriously though, trust me, I'm no spy, just your everyday chef on a grocery run. How about we transform this series of coincidences into something more enjoyable? Maybe a casual chat about the amazing weather or your favorite spot in this park?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"I'm glad to hear you're just a fellow park enthusiast, Hendrick! Too often, we let work overshadow the simple pleasures of life, like enjoying a sunny afternoon in the park. Let's focus on the beauty of this day and enjoy a good chat. Talking about favorite spots, have you seen the floral exhibit near the pond? The roses bloomed recently and are quite a sight to behold!\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, the floral exhibit? Yes! The roses truly do add a certain charm to the park at this time of year. Their blossoming is a sight I always look forward to every spring. Speaking of charm, have you experienced the annual wine tasting nights I host? Should be a different kind of bloom, but no less exciting!\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Wine tasting nights? That sounds fascinating, Hendrick! Quite a bloom indeed. I've always appreciated a good wine, and I imagine that would be a wonderful way to spend an evening. Thank you for extending the invitation, I would love to join in sometime. It adds another reason to look forward to stepping away from work!\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I'm genuinely happy to hear that, Lily! It's always an absolute delight to share one's love for wine with others who can appreciate it. And yes, it's important to step away from work and enjoy the simpler, yet finer things in life. So, keep an eye out for the next invite. But for now, let's take a leisurely stroll towards that floral exhibit. The fragrant aroma of blooming roses is too enticing to resist.\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"I would love that, Hendrick! As a lawyer, I don't usually get much chance to appreciate nature as much as I would like to. You're right, the aroma of roses is truly irresistible. Let's enjoy this beautiful day to the fullest. After all, it's not everyday that we get the perfect weather combined with the blooming roses!\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Lily! These are the moments that add flavor to life. It's easy to forget in our usually hectic routines. Just like a well-balanced dish, every aspect has its significance. But let's not waste any more time. After all, the roses won't admire themselves, will they?\"\n\nTurn #10: Lily Greenberg said: \"Indeed, we should savor the moment. What a delightful afternoon this turned out to be, Hendrick. After all, roses, sunshine, and good company are the ingredients for a perfect day. Let's go and admire those blooming roses, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"I couldn't agree more, Lily! After all, moments like these make life so special. Shall we move towards the roses then? After all, they're not getting any younger!\"\n\nTurn #12: Lily Greenberg said: \"Haha, you're right, Hendrick! Let's not keep the roses waiting. Lead the way, please!\"\n\nTurn #13: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely Lily! The roses await. After we're done admiring them, how about we end this beautiful day with some ice-cream from the local vendor? I've heard their Pistachio flavor is a special treat.\"\n\nTurn #14: Lily Greenberg said: \"Ice cream sounds like a fantastic idea, Hendrick! Pistachio happens to be one of my favorite flavors. A little indulgence never hurt, especially after such a delightful stroll through the roses. Let's do it!\"\n\nTurn #15: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's delightful to hear, Lily! I believe our day has just got a bit sweeter, then. Let's make our way to the roses, and subsequently the ice-cream vendor. After all, who could say no to a day full of sunshine, roses and Pistachio ice-cream, right?\"\n\nTurn #16: Lily Greenberg said: \"You're perfectly right, Hendrick! A day full of sunshine, roses and Pistachio ice cream is certainly too good to resist. Let's enjoy the rest of the afternoon. A day away from work was indeed much needed.\"\n\nTurn #17: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, Lily! It's important to break away from the routine once in a while. Today indeed turned out perfect. Now, let's not dilly dally, on to the roses and our grand Pistachio ice-cream finale!\"\n\nTurn #18: Lily Greenberg said: \"Absolutely, Hendrick! Nothing like a bit of spontaneity to spice up our daily routine. Let's head for the roses and cap off this wonderful day with some lovely Pistachio ice-cream. What a refreshing change from my usual work-driven schedule!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #19. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Couldn't agree more, Lily! An occasional break really does add some zest to our lives. Let's seize the day, starting with these roses, and finally the cherry on top - Pistachio ice-cream!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Italian Leather Loveseat for $50.0, while another person is showing interest to purchase it. The item is a full-sized loveseat, crafted from Italian leather in a faded burgandy color. It still has the original tags, and the current owner is the first and only owner. The loveseat is in good condition with no rips or tears, and all cushions are well preserved. The leather presents a charming faded look with various small scratches from the owner's cat, adding a touch of ruggedness perfect for a Man Cave. The transaction is strictly cash and carry as the owner does not offer delivery services.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nEsmeralda Solis's background: \nMiles Hawkins's goal: You are the designated buyer for this item and your target price is set at $46.0. If you purchase this item at a significantly higher price than the target, you would face a penalty. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Hey Esmeralda! I saw your listing for the Italian Leather Loveseat. It looks great! Can you tell me more about its history?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Italian Leather Loveseat for $50.0, while another person is showing interest to purchase it. The item is a full-sized loveseat, crafted from Italian leather in a faded burgandy color. It still has the original tags, and the current owner is the first and only owner. The loveseat is in good condition with no rips or tears, and all cushions are well preserved. The leather presents a charming faded look with various small scratches from the owner's cat, adding a touch of ruggedness perfect for a Man Cave. The transaction is strictly cash and carry as the owner does not offer delivery services.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nEsmeralda Solis's background: \nMiles Hawkins's goal: You are the designated buyer for this item and your target price is set at $46.0. If you purchase this item at a significantly higher price than the target, you would face a penalty. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Esmeralda! I saw your listing for the Italian Leather Loveseat. It looks great! Can you tell me more about its history?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Hello Miles. Lovely to hear that you're interested! This Italian Leather Loveseat has a unique history. It was purchased originally during my trip to Florence many years ago and has been a beautiful part of my living space ever since. It has a warm burgundy color which has elegantly faded over the years, adding a charm to it. The comfort and style it offers unmatched and I must say, makes it a great choice for a rugged, cosy area. Despite having my pet cat around the loveseat, it has remained in great condition with no tears or wears.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's truly fascinating, Esmeralda! So you've had this wonderful piece all to yourself since your trip? The wear and charm it has gathered over the years really do make it a great choice for a cosy space, like my study. Just wondering, as I would be packing and carrying it myself, could we negotiate the price a little? Perhaps something in the realm of say, $46? Just to cover some of my transport costs since it's cash and carry.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Italian Leather Loveseat for $50.0, while another person is showing interest to purchase it. The item is a full-sized loveseat, crafted from Italian leather in a faded burgandy color. It still has the original tags, and the current owner is the first and only owner. The loveseat is in good condition with no rips or tears, and all cushions are well preserved. The leather presents a charming faded look with various small scratches from the owner's cat, adding a touch of ruggedness perfect for a Man Cave. The transaction is strictly cash and carry as the owner does not offer delivery services.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nEsmeralda Solis's background: \nMiles Hawkins's goal: You are the designated buyer for this item and your target price is set at $46.0. If you purchase this item at a significantly higher price than the target, you would face a penalty. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Esmeralda! I saw your listing for the Italian Leather Loveseat. It looks great! Can you tell me more about its history?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Hello Miles. Lovely to hear that you're interested! This Italian Leather Loveseat has a unique history. It was purchased originally during my trip to Florence many years ago and has been a beautiful part of my living space ever since. It has a warm burgundy color which has elegantly faded over the years, adding a charm to it. The comfort and style it offers unmatched and I must say, makes it a great choice for a rugged, cosy area. Despite having my pet cat around the loveseat, it has remained in great condition with no tears or wears.\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"That's truly fascinating, Esmeralda! So you've had this wonderful piece all to yourself since your trip? The wear and charm it has gathered over the years really do make it a great choice for a cosy space, like my study. Just wondering, as I would be packing and carrying it myself, could we negotiate the price a little? Perhaps something in the realm of say, $46? Just to cover some of my transport costs since it's cash and carry.\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I'm glad you're considering it for your study, Miles. It does sound like a perfect fit! I think your request is fair considering the transportation. But could we meet at $55? This will also help me cover some of the costs that I previously absorbed when importing this from Italy.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I truly understand your point Esmeralda, and acknowledge the initial cost you bore to bring this elegant piece from Italy. However, my budget is a bit tight at the moment. Do you think you could consider my offer of $46? This takes nothing away from the loveseat's worth, but is simply a reflection of my current circumstances.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Italian Leather Loveseat for $50.0, while another person is showing interest to purchase it. The item is a full-sized loveseat, crafted from Italian leather in a faded burgandy color. It still has the original tags, and the current owner is the first and only owner. The loveseat is in good condition with no rips or tears, and all cushions are well preserved. The leather presents a charming faded look with various small scratches from the owner's cat, adding a touch of ruggedness perfect for a Man Cave. The transaction is strictly cash and carry as the owner does not offer delivery services.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nEsmeralda Solis's background: \nMiles Hawkins's goal: You are the designated buyer for this item and your target price is set at $46.0. If you purchase this item at a significantly higher price than the target, you would face a penalty. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Esmeralda! I saw your listing for the Italian Leather Loveseat. It looks great! Can you tell me more about its history?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Hello Miles. Lovely to hear that you're interested! This Italian Leather Loveseat has a unique history. It was purchased originally during my trip to Florence many years ago and has been a beautiful part of my living space ever since. It has a warm burgundy color which has elegantly faded over the years, adding a charm to it. The comfort and style it offers unmatched and I must say, makes it a great choice for a rugged, cosy area. Despite having my pet cat around the loveseat, it has remained in great condition with no tears or wears.\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"That's truly fascinating, Esmeralda! So you've had this wonderful piece all to yourself since your trip? The wear and charm it has gathered over the years really do make it a great choice for a cosy space, like my study. Just wondering, as I would be packing and carrying it myself, could we negotiate the price a little? Perhaps something in the realm of say, $46? Just to cover some of my transport costs since it's cash and carry.\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I'm glad you're considering it for your study, Miles. It does sound like a perfect fit! I think your request is fair considering the transportation. But could we meet at $55? This will also help me cover some of the costs that I previously absorbed when importing this from Italy.\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"I truly understand your point Esmeralda, and acknowledge the initial cost you bore to bring this elegant piece from Italy. However, my budget is a bit tight at the moment. Do you think you could consider my offer of $46? This takes nothing away from the loveseat's worth, but is simply a reflection of my current circumstances.\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I understand your budget concerns, Miles. Given the circumstances, the best I can comfortably bring it down to is $52. This Italian Leather Loveseat holds significant value given its condition and its history. I hope this adjustment could make the purchase more feasible for you.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'I appreciate your understanding, Esmeralda, and agree that the loveseat holds significant value not just in monetary terms but with regards to its history and condition as well. Nevertheless, the highest I can stretch to is $48 given my current situation. I hope this small compromise will nudge us closer to an agreement. After all, I am very much looking forward to making the loveseat a part of my study.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Italian Leather Loveseat for $50.0, while another person is showing interest to purchase it. The item is a full-sized loveseat, crafted from Italian leather in a faded burgandy color. It still has the original tags, and the current owner is the first and only owner. The loveseat is in good condition with no rips or tears, and all cushions are well preserved. The leather presents a charming faded look with various small scratches from the owner's cat, adding a touch of ruggedness perfect for a Man Cave. The transaction is strictly cash and carry as the owner does not offer delivery services.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nEsmeralda Solis's background: \nMiles Hawkins's goal: You are the designated buyer for this item and your target price is set at $46.0. If you purchase this item at a significantly higher price than the target, you would face a penalty. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Esmeralda! I saw your listing for the Italian Leather Loveseat. It looks great! Can you tell me more about its history?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Hello Miles. Lovely to hear that you're interested! This Italian Leather Loveseat has a unique history. It was purchased originally during my trip to Florence many years ago and has been a beautiful part of my living space ever since. It has a warm burgundy color which has elegantly faded over the years, adding a charm to it. The comfort and style it offers unmatched and I must say, makes it a great choice for a rugged, cosy area. Despite having my pet cat around the loveseat, it has remained in great condition with no tears or wears.\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"That's truly fascinating, Esmeralda! So you've had this wonderful piece all to yourself since your trip? The wear and charm it has gathered over the years really do make it a great choice for a cosy space, like my study. Just wondering, as I would be packing and carrying it myself, could we negotiate the price a little? Perhaps something in the realm of say, $46? Just to cover some of my transport costs since it's cash and carry.\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I'm glad you're considering it for your study, Miles. It does sound like a perfect fit! I think your request is fair considering the transportation. But could we meet at $55? This will also help me cover some of the costs that I previously absorbed when importing this from Italy.\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"I truly understand your point Esmeralda, and acknowledge the initial cost you bore to bring this elegant piece from Italy. However, my budget is a bit tight at the moment. Do you think you could consider my offer of $46? This takes nothing away from the loveseat's worth, but is simply a reflection of my current circumstances.\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I understand your budget concerns, Miles. Given the circumstances, the best I can comfortably bring it down to is $52. This Italian Leather Loveseat holds significant value given its condition and its history. I hope this adjustment could make the purchase more feasible for you.\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Esmeralda, and agree that the loveseat holds significant value not just in monetary terms but with regards to its history and condition as well. Nevertheless, the highest I can stretch to is $48 given my current situation. I hope this small compromise will nudge us closer to an agreement. After all, I am very much looking forward to making the loveseat a part of my study.\"\n\nTurn #7: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Miles, considering your keen interest and bearing in mind your current situation, I can agree to your offer of $48. I am sure this loveseat will make a great addition to your study. Shall we proceed with the sale?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Esmeralda, I'm incredibly grateful for your understanding and am happy to accept your offer of $48. I am excited to bring this cherished piece into my study. Let's proceed with the sale.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Italian Leather Loveseat for $50.0, while another person is showing interest to purchase it. The item is a full-sized loveseat, crafted from Italian leather in a faded burgandy color. It still has the original tags, and the current owner is the first and only owner. The loveseat is in good condition with no rips or tears, and all cushions are well preserved. The leather presents a charming faded look with various small scratches from the owner's cat, adding a touch of ruggedness perfect for a Man Cave. The transaction is strictly cash and carry as the owner does not offer delivery services.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nEsmeralda Solis's background: \nMiles Hawkins's goal: You are the designated buyer for this item and your target price is set at $46.0. If you purchase this item at a significantly higher price than the target, you would face a penalty. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Esmeralda! I saw your listing for the Italian Leather Loveseat. It looks great! Can you tell me more about its history?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Hello Miles. Lovely to hear that you're interested! This Italian Leather Loveseat has a unique history. It was purchased originally during my trip to Florence many years ago and has been a beautiful part of my living space ever since. It has a warm burgundy color which has elegantly faded over the years, adding a charm to it. The comfort and style it offers unmatched and I must say, makes it a great choice for a rugged, cosy area. Despite having my pet cat around the loveseat, it has remained in great condition with no tears or wears.\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"That's truly fascinating, Esmeralda! So you've had this wonderful piece all to yourself since your trip? The wear and charm it has gathered over the years really do make it a great choice for a cosy space, like my study. Just wondering, as I would be packing and carrying it myself, could we negotiate the price a little? Perhaps something in the realm of say, $46? Just to cover some of my transport costs since it's cash and carry.\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I'm glad you're considering it for your study, Miles. It does sound like a perfect fit! I think your request is fair considering the transportation. But could we meet at $55? This will also help me cover some of the costs that I previously absorbed when importing this from Italy.\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"I truly understand your point Esmeralda, and acknowledge the initial cost you bore to bring this elegant piece from Italy. However, my budget is a bit tight at the moment. Do you think you could consider my offer of $46? This takes nothing away from the loveseat's worth, but is simply a reflection of my current circumstances.\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I understand your budget concerns, Miles. Given the circumstances, the best I can comfortably bring it down to is $52. This Italian Leather Loveseat holds significant value given its condition and its history. I hope this adjustment could make the purchase more feasible for you.\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Esmeralda, and agree that the loveseat holds significant value not just in monetary terms but with regards to its history and condition as well. Nevertheless, the highest I can stretch to is $48 given my current situation. I hope this small compromise will nudge us closer to an agreement. After all, I am very much looking forward to making the loveseat a part of my study.\"\n\nTurn #7: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Miles, considering your keen interest and bearing in mind your current situation, I can agree to your offer of $48. I am sure this loveseat will make a great addition to your study. Shall we proceed with the sale?\"\n\nTurn #8: Miles Hawkins said: \"Esmeralda, I'm incredibly grateful for your understanding and am happy to accept your offer of $48. I am excited to bring this cherished piece into my study. Let's proceed with the sale.\"\n\nTurn #9: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Miles. I'll prepare the loveseat for you to pick up. It was a pleasure doing business with you. Just let me know when you are available to collect it.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Thank you, Esmeralda. I appreciate your flexibility. I can come by tomorrow afternoon to pick it up if that works for you. Looking forward to seeing the loveseat in person!'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Italian Leather Loveseat for $50.0, while another person is showing interest to purchase it. The item is a full-sized loveseat, crafted from Italian leather in a faded burgandy color. It still has the original tags, and the current owner is the first and only owner. The loveseat is in good condition with no rips or tears, and all cushions are well preserved. The leather presents a charming faded look with various small scratches from the owner's cat, adding a touch of ruggedness perfect for a Man Cave. The transaction is strictly cash and carry as the owner does not offer delivery services.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nEsmeralda Solis's background: \nMiles Hawkins's goal: You are the designated buyer for this item and your target price is set at $46.0. If you purchase this item at a significantly higher price than the target, you would face a penalty. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Esmeralda! I saw your listing for the Italian Leather Loveseat. It looks great! Can you tell me more about its history?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Hello Miles. Lovely to hear that you're interested! This Italian Leather Loveseat has a unique history. It was purchased originally during my trip to Florence many years ago and has been a beautiful part of my living space ever since. It has a warm burgundy color which has elegantly faded over the years, adding a charm to it. The comfort and style it offers unmatched and I must say, makes it a great choice for a rugged, cosy area. Despite having my pet cat around the loveseat, it has remained in great condition with no tears or wears.\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"That's truly fascinating, Esmeralda! So you've had this wonderful piece all to yourself since your trip? The wear and charm it has gathered over the years really do make it a great choice for a cosy space, like my study. Just wondering, as I would be packing and carrying it myself, could we negotiate the price a little? Perhaps something in the realm of say, $46? Just to cover some of my transport costs since it's cash and carry.\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I'm glad you're considering it for your study, Miles. It does sound like a perfect fit! I think your request is fair considering the transportation. But could we meet at $55? This will also help me cover some of the costs that I previously absorbed when importing this from Italy.\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"I truly understand your point Esmeralda, and acknowledge the initial cost you bore to bring this elegant piece from Italy. However, my budget is a bit tight at the moment. Do you think you could consider my offer of $46? This takes nothing away from the loveseat's worth, but is simply a reflection of my current circumstances.\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I understand your budget concerns, Miles. Given the circumstances, the best I can comfortably bring it down to is $52. This Italian Leather Loveseat holds significant value given its condition and its history. I hope this adjustment could make the purchase more feasible for you.\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Esmeralda, and agree that the loveseat holds significant value not just in monetary terms but with regards to its history and condition as well. Nevertheless, the highest I can stretch to is $48 given my current situation. I hope this small compromise will nudge us closer to an agreement. After all, I am very much looking forward to making the loveseat a part of my study.\"\n\nTurn #7: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Miles, considering your keen interest and bearing in mind your current situation, I can agree to your offer of $48. I am sure this loveseat will make a great addition to your study. Shall we proceed with the sale?\"\n\nTurn #8: Miles Hawkins said: \"Esmeralda, I'm incredibly grateful for your understanding and am happy to accept your offer of $48. I am excited to bring this cherished piece into my study. Let's proceed with the sale.\"\n\nTurn #9: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Miles. I'll prepare the loveseat for you to pick up. It was a pleasure doing business with you. Just let me know when you are available to collect it.\"\n\nTurn #10: Miles Hawkins said: \"Thank you, Esmeralda. I appreciate your flexibility. I can come by tomorrow afternoon to pick it up if that works for you. Looking forward to seeing the loveseat in person!\"\n\nTurn #11: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Tomorrow afternoon works perfectly for me, Miles. Looking forward to your visit. I'm sure you'll be pleased with the loveseat. Have a great day!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds great, Esmeralda. I'm truly grateful for your understanding and flexibility in this transaction. I'll see you tomorrow afternoon then. Have a great day!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Italian Leather Loveseat for $50.0, while another person is showing interest to purchase it. The item is a full-sized loveseat, crafted from Italian leather in a faded burgandy color. It still has the original tags, and the current owner is the first and only owner. The loveseat is in good condition with no rips or tears, and all cushions are well preserved. The leather presents a charming faded look with various small scratches from the owner's cat, adding a touch of ruggedness perfect for a Man Cave. The transaction is strictly cash and carry as the owner does not offer delivery services.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nEsmeralda Solis's background: \nMiles Hawkins's goal: You are the designated buyer for this item and your target price is set at $46.0. If you purchase this item at a significantly higher price than the target, you would face a penalty. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Esmeralda! I saw your listing for the Italian Leather Loveseat. It looks great! Can you tell me more about its history?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Hello Miles. Lovely to hear that you're interested! This Italian Leather Loveseat has a unique history. It was purchased originally during my trip to Florence many years ago and has been a beautiful part of my living space ever since. It has a warm burgundy color which has elegantly faded over the years, adding a charm to it. The comfort and style it offers unmatched and I must say, makes it a great choice for a rugged, cosy area. Despite having my pet cat around the loveseat, it has remained in great condition with no tears or wears.\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"That's truly fascinating, Esmeralda! So you've had this wonderful piece all to yourself since your trip? The wear and charm it has gathered over the years really do make it a great choice for a cosy space, like my study. Just wondering, as I would be packing and carrying it myself, could we negotiate the price a little? Perhaps something in the realm of say, $46? Just to cover some of my transport costs since it's cash and carry.\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I'm glad you're considering it for your study, Miles. It does sound like a perfect fit! I think your request is fair considering the transportation. But could we meet at $55? This will also help me cover some of the costs that I previously absorbed when importing this from Italy.\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"I truly understand your point Esmeralda, and acknowledge the initial cost you bore to bring this elegant piece from Italy. However, my budget is a bit tight at the moment. Do you think you could consider my offer of $46? This takes nothing away from the loveseat's worth, but is simply a reflection of my current circumstances.\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I understand your budget concerns, Miles. Given the circumstances, the best I can comfortably bring it down to is $52. This Italian Leather Loveseat holds significant value given its condition and its history. I hope this adjustment could make the purchase more feasible for you.\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Esmeralda, and agree that the loveseat holds significant value not just in monetary terms but with regards to its history and condition as well. Nevertheless, the highest I can stretch to is $48 given my current situation. I hope this small compromise will nudge us closer to an agreement. After all, I am very much looking forward to making the loveseat a part of my study.\"\n\nTurn #7: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Miles, considering your keen interest and bearing in mind your current situation, I can agree to your offer of $48. I am sure this loveseat will make a great addition to your study. Shall we proceed with the sale?\"\n\nTurn #8: Miles Hawkins said: \"Esmeralda, I'm incredibly grateful for your understanding and am happy to accept your offer of $48. I am excited to bring this cherished piece into my study. Let's proceed with the sale.\"\n\nTurn #9: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Miles. I'll prepare the loveseat for you to pick up. It was a pleasure doing business with you. Just let me know when you are available to collect it.\"\n\nTurn #10: Miles Hawkins said: \"Thank you, Esmeralda. I appreciate your flexibility. I can come by tomorrow afternoon to pick it up if that works for you. Looking forward to seeing the loveseat in person!\"\n\nTurn #11: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Tomorrow afternoon works perfectly for me, Miles. Looking forward to your visit. I'm sure you'll be pleased with the loveseat. Have a great day!\"\n\nTurn #12: Miles Hawkins said: \"That sounds great, Esmeralda. I'm truly grateful for your understanding and flexibility in this transaction. I'll see you tomorrow afternoon then. Have a great day!\"\n\nTurn #13: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Thank you, Miles. Your understanding is equally appreciated. See you tomorrow afternoon. Stay safe and have a wonderful day!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Italian Leather Loveseat for $50.0, while another person is showing interest to purchase it. The item is a full-sized loveseat, crafted from Italian leather in a faded burgandy color. It still has the original tags, and the current owner is the first and only owner. The loveseat is in good condition with no rips or tears, and all cushions are well preserved. The leather presents a charming faded look with various small scratches from the owner's cat, adding a touch of ruggedness perfect for a Man Cave. The transaction is strictly cash and carry as the owner does not offer delivery services.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: You are the seller for this item, with a target price of $26.5. You'll face a penalty if the item is sold significantly below this price. However, if you manage to sell it for more than the target price, a bonus will be your reward.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Esmeralda! I saw your listing for the Italian Leather Loveseat. It looks great! Can you tell me more about its history?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hello Miles. Lovely to hear that you're interested! This Italian Leather Loveseat has a unique history. It was purchased originally during my trip to Florence many years ago and has been a beautiful part of my living space ever since. It has a warm burgundy color which has elegantly faded over the years, adding a charm to it. The comfort and style it offers unmatched and I must say, makes it a great choice for a rugged, cosy area. Despite having my pet cat around the loveseat, it has remained in great condition with no tears or wears.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Italian Leather Loveseat for $50.0, while another person is showing interest to purchase it. The item is a full-sized loveseat, crafted from Italian leather in a faded burgandy color. It still has the original tags, and the current owner is the first and only owner. The loveseat is in good condition with no rips or tears, and all cushions are well preserved. The leather presents a charming faded look with various small scratches from the owner's cat, adding a touch of ruggedness perfect for a Man Cave. The transaction is strictly cash and carry as the owner does not offer delivery services.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: You are the seller for this item, with a target price of $26.5. You'll face a penalty if the item is sold significantly below this price. However, if you manage to sell it for more than the target price, a bonus will be your reward.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Esmeralda! I saw your listing for the Italian Leather Loveseat. It looks great! Can you tell me more about its history?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Hello Miles. Lovely to hear that you're interested! This Italian Leather Loveseat has a unique history. It was purchased originally during my trip to Florence many years ago and has been a beautiful part of my living space ever since. It has a warm burgundy color which has elegantly faded over the years, adding a charm to it. The comfort and style it offers unmatched and I must say, makes it a great choice for a rugged, cosy area. Despite having my pet cat around the loveseat, it has remained in great condition with no tears or wears.\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"That's truly fascinating, Esmeralda! So you've had this wonderful piece all to yourself since your trip? The wear and charm it has gathered over the years really do make it a great choice for a cosy space, like my study. Just wondering, as I would be packing and carrying it myself, could we negotiate the price a little? Perhaps something in the realm of say, $46? Just to cover some of my transport costs since it's cash and carry.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad you're considering it for your study, Miles. It does sound like a perfect fit! I think your request is fair considering the transportation. But could we meet at $55? This will also help me cover some of the costs that I previously absorbed when importing this from Italy.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Italian Leather Loveseat for $50.0, while another person is showing interest to purchase it. The item is a full-sized loveseat, crafted from Italian leather in a faded burgandy color. It still has the original tags, and the current owner is the first and only owner. The loveseat is in good condition with no rips or tears, and all cushions are well preserved. The leather presents a charming faded look with various small scratches from the owner's cat, adding a touch of ruggedness perfect for a Man Cave. The transaction is strictly cash and carry as the owner does not offer delivery services.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: You are the seller for this item, with a target price of $26.5. You'll face a penalty if the item is sold significantly below this price. However, if you manage to sell it for more than the target price, a bonus will be your reward.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Esmeralda! I saw your listing for the Italian Leather Loveseat. It looks great! Can you tell me more about its history?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Hello Miles. Lovely to hear that you're interested! This Italian Leather Loveseat has a unique history. It was purchased originally during my trip to Florence many years ago and has been a beautiful part of my living space ever since. It has a warm burgundy color which has elegantly faded over the years, adding a charm to it. The comfort and style it offers unmatched and I must say, makes it a great choice for a rugged, cosy area. Despite having my pet cat around the loveseat, it has remained in great condition with no tears or wears.\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"That's truly fascinating, Esmeralda! So you've had this wonderful piece all to yourself since your trip? The wear and charm it has gathered over the years really do make it a great choice for a cosy space, like my study. Just wondering, as I would be packing and carrying it myself, could we negotiate the price a little? Perhaps something in the realm of say, $46? Just to cover some of my transport costs since it's cash and carry.\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I'm glad you're considering it for your study, Miles. It does sound like a perfect fit! I think your request is fair considering the transportation. But could we meet at $55? This will also help me cover some of the costs that I previously absorbed when importing this from Italy.\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"I truly understand your point Esmeralda, and acknowledge the initial cost you bore to bring this elegant piece from Italy. However, my budget is a bit tight at the moment. Do you think you could consider my offer of $46? This takes nothing away from the loveseat's worth, but is simply a reflection of my current circumstances.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'I understand your budget concerns, Miles. Given the circumstances, the best I can comfortably bring it down to is $52. This Italian Leather Loveseat holds significant value given its condition and its history. I hope this adjustment could make the purchase more feasible for you.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Italian Leather Loveseat for $50.0, while another person is showing interest to purchase it. The item is a full-sized loveseat, crafted from Italian leather in a faded burgandy color. It still has the original tags, and the current owner is the first and only owner. The loveseat is in good condition with no rips or tears, and all cushions are well preserved. The leather presents a charming faded look with various small scratches from the owner's cat, adding a touch of ruggedness perfect for a Man Cave. The transaction is strictly cash and carry as the owner does not offer delivery services.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: You are the seller for this item, with a target price of $26.5. You'll face a penalty if the item is sold significantly below this price. However, if you manage to sell it for more than the target price, a bonus will be your reward.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Esmeralda! I saw your listing for the Italian Leather Loveseat. It looks great! Can you tell me more about its history?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Hello Miles. Lovely to hear that you're interested! This Italian Leather Loveseat has a unique history. It was purchased originally during my trip to Florence many years ago and has been a beautiful part of my living space ever since. It has a warm burgundy color which has elegantly faded over the years, adding a charm to it. The comfort and style it offers unmatched and I must say, makes it a great choice for a rugged, cosy area. Despite having my pet cat around the loveseat, it has remained in great condition with no tears or wears.\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"That's truly fascinating, Esmeralda! So you've had this wonderful piece all to yourself since your trip? The wear and charm it has gathered over the years really do make it a great choice for a cosy space, like my study. Just wondering, as I would be packing and carrying it myself, could we negotiate the price a little? Perhaps something in the realm of say, $46? Just to cover some of my transport costs since it's cash and carry.\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I'm glad you're considering it for your study, Miles. It does sound like a perfect fit! I think your request is fair considering the transportation. But could we meet at $55? This will also help me cover some of the costs that I previously absorbed when importing this from Italy.\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"I truly understand your point Esmeralda, and acknowledge the initial cost you bore to bring this elegant piece from Italy. However, my budget is a bit tight at the moment. Do you think you could consider my offer of $46? This takes nothing away from the loveseat's worth, but is simply a reflection of my current circumstances.\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I understand your budget concerns, Miles. Given the circumstances, the best I can comfortably bring it down to is $52. This Italian Leather Loveseat holds significant value given its condition and its history. I hope this adjustment could make the purchase more feasible for you.\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Esmeralda, and agree that the loveseat holds significant value not just in monetary terms but with regards to its history and condition as well. Nevertheless, the highest I can stretch to is $48 given my current situation. I hope this small compromise will nudge us closer to an agreement. After all, I am very much looking forward to making the loveseat a part of my study.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Miles, considering your keen interest and bearing in mind your current situation, I can agree to your offer of $48. I am sure this loveseat will make a great addition to your study. Shall we proceed with the sale?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Italian Leather Loveseat for $50.0, while another person is showing interest to purchase it. The item is a full-sized loveseat, crafted from Italian leather in a faded burgandy color. It still has the original tags, and the current owner is the first and only owner. The loveseat is in good condition with no rips or tears, and all cushions are well preserved. The leather presents a charming faded look with various small scratches from the owner's cat, adding a touch of ruggedness perfect for a Man Cave. The transaction is strictly cash and carry as the owner does not offer delivery services.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: You are the seller for this item, with a target price of $26.5. You'll face a penalty if the item is sold significantly below this price. However, if you manage to sell it for more than the target price, a bonus will be your reward.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Esmeralda! I saw your listing for the Italian Leather Loveseat. It looks great! Can you tell me more about its history?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Hello Miles. Lovely to hear that you're interested! This Italian Leather Loveseat has a unique history. It was purchased originally during my trip to Florence many years ago and has been a beautiful part of my living space ever since. It has a warm burgundy color which has elegantly faded over the years, adding a charm to it. The comfort and style it offers unmatched and I must say, makes it a great choice for a rugged, cosy area. Despite having my pet cat around the loveseat, it has remained in great condition with no tears or wears.\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"That's truly fascinating, Esmeralda! So you've had this wonderful piece all to yourself since your trip? The wear and charm it has gathered over the years really do make it a great choice for a cosy space, like my study. Just wondering, as I would be packing and carrying it myself, could we negotiate the price a little? Perhaps something in the realm of say, $46? Just to cover some of my transport costs since it's cash and carry.\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I'm glad you're considering it for your study, Miles. It does sound like a perfect fit! I think your request is fair considering the transportation. But could we meet at $55? This will also help me cover some of the costs that I previously absorbed when importing this from Italy.\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"I truly understand your point Esmeralda, and acknowledge the initial cost you bore to bring this elegant piece from Italy. However, my budget is a bit tight at the moment. Do you think you could consider my offer of $46? This takes nothing away from the loveseat's worth, but is simply a reflection of my current circumstances.\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I understand your budget concerns, Miles. Given the circumstances, the best I can comfortably bring it down to is $52. This Italian Leather Loveseat holds significant value given its condition and its history. I hope this adjustment could make the purchase more feasible for you.\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Esmeralda, and agree that the loveseat holds significant value not just in monetary terms but with regards to its history and condition as well. Nevertheless, the highest I can stretch to is $48 given my current situation. I hope this small compromise will nudge us closer to an agreement. After all, I am very much looking forward to making the loveseat a part of my study.\"\n\nTurn #7: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Miles, considering your keen interest and bearing in mind your current situation, I can agree to your offer of $48. I am sure this loveseat will make a great addition to your study. Shall we proceed with the sale?\"\n\nTurn #8: Miles Hawkins said: \"Esmeralda, I'm incredibly grateful for your understanding and am happy to accept your offer of $48. I am excited to bring this cherished piece into my study. Let's proceed with the sale.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad to hear that, Miles. I'll prepare the loveseat for you to pick up. It was a pleasure doing business with you. Just let me know when you are available to collect it.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Italian Leather Loveseat for $50.0, while another person is showing interest to purchase it. The item is a full-sized loveseat, crafted from Italian leather in a faded burgandy color. It still has the original tags, and the current owner is the first and only owner. The loveseat is in good condition with no rips or tears, and all cushions are well preserved. The leather presents a charming faded look with various small scratches from the owner's cat, adding a touch of ruggedness perfect for a Man Cave. The transaction is strictly cash and carry as the owner does not offer delivery services.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: You are the seller for this item, with a target price of $26.5. You'll face a penalty if the item is sold significantly below this price. However, if you manage to sell it for more than the target price, a bonus will be your reward.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Esmeralda! I saw your listing for the Italian Leather Loveseat. It looks great! Can you tell me more about its history?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Hello Miles. Lovely to hear that you're interested! This Italian Leather Loveseat has a unique history. It was purchased originally during my trip to Florence many years ago and has been a beautiful part of my living space ever since. It has a warm burgundy color which has elegantly faded over the years, adding a charm to it. The comfort and style it offers unmatched and I must say, makes it a great choice for a rugged, cosy area. Despite having my pet cat around the loveseat, it has remained in great condition with no tears or wears.\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"That's truly fascinating, Esmeralda! So you've had this wonderful piece all to yourself since your trip? The wear and charm it has gathered over the years really do make it a great choice for a cosy space, like my study. Just wondering, as I would be packing and carrying it myself, could we negotiate the price a little? Perhaps something in the realm of say, $46? Just to cover some of my transport costs since it's cash and carry.\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I'm glad you're considering it for your study, Miles. It does sound like a perfect fit! I think your request is fair considering the transportation. But could we meet at $55? This will also help me cover some of the costs that I previously absorbed when importing this from Italy.\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"I truly understand your point Esmeralda, and acknowledge the initial cost you bore to bring this elegant piece from Italy. However, my budget is a bit tight at the moment. Do you think you could consider my offer of $46? This takes nothing away from the loveseat's worth, but is simply a reflection of my current circumstances.\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I understand your budget concerns, Miles. Given the circumstances, the best I can comfortably bring it down to is $52. This Italian Leather Loveseat holds significant value given its condition and its history. I hope this adjustment could make the purchase more feasible for you.\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Esmeralda, and agree that the loveseat holds significant value not just in monetary terms but with regards to its history and condition as well. Nevertheless, the highest I can stretch to is $48 given my current situation. I hope this small compromise will nudge us closer to an agreement. After all, I am very much looking forward to making the loveseat a part of my study.\"\n\nTurn #7: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Miles, considering your keen interest and bearing in mind your current situation, I can agree to your offer of $48. I am sure this loveseat will make a great addition to your study. Shall we proceed with the sale?\"\n\nTurn #8: Miles Hawkins said: \"Esmeralda, I'm incredibly grateful for your understanding and am happy to accept your offer of $48. I am excited to bring this cherished piece into my study. Let's proceed with the sale.\"\n\nTurn #9: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Miles. I'll prepare the loveseat for you to pick up. It was a pleasure doing business with you. Just let me know when you are available to collect it.\"\n\nTurn #10: Miles Hawkins said: \"Thank you, Esmeralda. I appreciate your flexibility. I can come by tomorrow afternoon to pick it up if that works for you. Looking forward to seeing the loveseat in person!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Tomorrow afternoon works perfectly for me, Miles. Looking forward to your visit. I'm sure you'll be pleased with the loveseat. Have a great day!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Italian Leather Loveseat for $50.0, while another person is showing interest to purchase it. The item is a full-sized loveseat, crafted from Italian leather in a faded burgandy color. It still has the original tags, and the current owner is the first and only owner. The loveseat is in good condition with no rips or tears, and all cushions are well preserved. The leather presents a charming faded look with various small scratches from the owner's cat, adding a touch of ruggedness perfect for a Man Cave. The transaction is strictly cash and carry as the owner does not offer delivery services.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: You are the seller for this item, with a target price of $26.5. You'll face a penalty if the item is sold significantly below this price. However, if you manage to sell it for more than the target price, a bonus will be your reward.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Esmeralda! I saw your listing for the Italian Leather Loveseat. It looks great! Can you tell me more about its history?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Hello Miles. Lovely to hear that you're interested! This Italian Leather Loveseat has a unique history. It was purchased originally during my trip to Florence many years ago and has been a beautiful part of my living space ever since. It has a warm burgundy color which has elegantly faded over the years, adding a charm to it. The comfort and style it offers unmatched and I must say, makes it a great choice for a rugged, cosy area. Despite having my pet cat around the loveseat, it has remained in great condition with no tears or wears.\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"That's truly fascinating, Esmeralda! So you've had this wonderful piece all to yourself since your trip? The wear and charm it has gathered over the years really do make it a great choice for a cosy space, like my study. Just wondering, as I would be packing and carrying it myself, could we negotiate the price a little? Perhaps something in the realm of say, $46? Just to cover some of my transport costs since it's cash and carry.\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I'm glad you're considering it for your study, Miles. It does sound like a perfect fit! I think your request is fair considering the transportation. But could we meet at $55? This will also help me cover some of the costs that I previously absorbed when importing this from Italy.\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"I truly understand your point Esmeralda, and acknowledge the initial cost you bore to bring this elegant piece from Italy. However, my budget is a bit tight at the moment. Do you think you could consider my offer of $46? This takes nothing away from the loveseat's worth, but is simply a reflection of my current circumstances.\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I understand your budget concerns, Miles. Given the circumstances, the best I can comfortably bring it down to is $52. This Italian Leather Loveseat holds significant value given its condition and its history. I hope this adjustment could make the purchase more feasible for you.\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Esmeralda, and agree that the loveseat holds significant value not just in monetary terms but with regards to its history and condition as well. Nevertheless, the highest I can stretch to is $48 given my current situation. I hope this small compromise will nudge us closer to an agreement. After all, I am very much looking forward to making the loveseat a part of my study.\"\n\nTurn #7: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Miles, considering your keen interest and bearing in mind your current situation, I can agree to your offer of $48. I am sure this loveseat will make a great addition to your study. Shall we proceed with the sale?\"\n\nTurn #8: Miles Hawkins said: \"Esmeralda, I'm incredibly grateful for your understanding and am happy to accept your offer of $48. I am excited to bring this cherished piece into my study. Let's proceed with the sale.\"\n\nTurn #9: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Miles. I'll prepare the loveseat for you to pick up. It was a pleasure doing business with you. Just let me know when you are available to collect it.\"\n\nTurn #10: Miles Hawkins said: \"Thank you, Esmeralda. I appreciate your flexibility. I can come by tomorrow afternoon to pick it up if that works for you. Looking forward to seeing the loveseat in person!\"\n\nTurn #11: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Tomorrow afternoon works perfectly for me, Miles. Looking forward to your visit. I'm sure you'll be pleased with the loveseat. Have a great day!\"\n\nTurn #12: Miles Hawkins said: \"That sounds great, Esmeralda. I'm truly grateful for your understanding and flexibility in this transaction. I'll see you tomorrow afternoon then. Have a great day!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Thank you, Miles. Your understanding is equally appreciated. See you tomorrow afternoon. Stay safe and have a wonderful day!'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Italian Leather Loveseat for $50.0, while another person is showing interest to purchase it. The item is a full-sized loveseat, crafted from Italian leather in a faded burgandy color. It still has the original tags, and the current owner is the first and only owner. The loveseat is in good condition with no rips or tears, and all cushions are well preserved. The leather presents a charming faded look with various small scratches from the owner's cat, adding a touch of ruggedness perfect for a Man Cave. The transaction is strictly cash and carry as the owner does not offer delivery services.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: You are the seller for this item, with a target price of $26.5. You'll face a penalty if the item is sold significantly below this price. However, if you manage to sell it for more than the target price, a bonus will be your reward.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hey Esmeralda! I saw your listing for the Italian Leather Loveseat. It looks great! Can you tell me more about its history?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Hello Miles. Lovely to hear that you're interested! This Italian Leather Loveseat has a unique history. It was purchased originally during my trip to Florence many years ago and has been a beautiful part of my living space ever since. It has a warm burgundy color which has elegantly faded over the years, adding a charm to it. The comfort and style it offers unmatched and I must say, makes it a great choice for a rugged, cosy area. Despite having my pet cat around the loveseat, it has remained in great condition with no tears or wears.\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"That's truly fascinating, Esmeralda! So you've had this wonderful piece all to yourself since your trip? The wear and charm it has gathered over the years really do make it a great choice for a cosy space, like my study. Just wondering, as I would be packing and carrying it myself, could we negotiate the price a little? Perhaps something in the realm of say, $46? Just to cover some of my transport costs since it's cash and carry.\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I'm glad you're considering it for your study, Miles. It does sound like a perfect fit! I think your request is fair considering the transportation. But could we meet at $55? This will also help me cover some of the costs that I previously absorbed when importing this from Italy.\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"I truly understand your point Esmeralda, and acknowledge the initial cost you bore to bring this elegant piece from Italy. However, my budget is a bit tight at the moment. Do you think you could consider my offer of $46? This takes nothing away from the loveseat's worth, but is simply a reflection of my current circumstances.\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I understand your budget concerns, Miles. Given the circumstances, the best I can comfortably bring it down to is $52. This Italian Leather Loveseat holds significant value given its condition and its history. I hope this adjustment could make the purchase more feasible for you.\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins said: \"I appreciate your understanding, Esmeralda, and agree that the loveseat holds significant value not just in monetary terms but with regards to its history and condition as well. Nevertheless, the highest I can stretch to is $48 given my current situation. I hope this small compromise will nudge us closer to an agreement. After all, I am very much looking forward to making the loveseat a part of my study.\"\n\nTurn #7: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Miles, considering your keen interest and bearing in mind your current situation, I can agree to your offer of $48. I am sure this loveseat will make a great addition to your study. Shall we proceed with the sale?\"\n\nTurn #8: Miles Hawkins said: \"Esmeralda, I'm incredibly grateful for your understanding and am happy to accept your offer of $48. I am excited to bring this cherished piece into my study. Let's proceed with the sale.\"\n\nTurn #9: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I'm glad to hear that, Miles. I'll prepare the loveseat for you to pick up. It was a pleasure doing business with you. Just let me know when you are available to collect it.\"\n\nTurn #10: Miles Hawkins said: \"Thank you, Esmeralda. I appreciate your flexibility. I can come by tomorrow afternoon to pick it up if that works for you. Looking forward to seeing the loveseat in person!\"\n\nTurn #11: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Tomorrow afternoon works perfectly for me, Miles. Looking forward to your visit. I'm sure you'll be pleased with the loveseat. Have a great day!\"\n\nTurn #12: Miles Hawkins said: \"That sounds great, Esmeralda. I'm truly grateful for your understanding and flexibility in this transaction. I'll see you tomorrow afternoon then. Have a great day!\"\n\nTurn #13: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Thank you, Miles. Your understanding is equally appreciated. See you tomorrow afternoon. Stay safe and have a wonderful day!\"\n\nTurn #14: Miles Hawkins left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Micah Stevens and Jaxon Prentice\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nJaxon Prentice's background: \nMicah Stevens's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDavid: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Christian Moerlein Brewing Company Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nLarry: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nLynn: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Cray Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nDonald: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Advance Auto Parts Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nDennis: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nJane: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Planet Hollywood Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nHarvey: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: Sony Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nNinfa: Hobby: Quilting Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nAngelica: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Planet Hollywood Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \n\nJaxon Prentice's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey there! My name's Micah. That's quite a shindig, isn't it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Micah Stevens and Jaxon Prentice\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nJaxon Prentice's background: \nMicah Stevens's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDavid: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Christian Moerlein Brewing Company Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nLarry: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nLynn: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Cray Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nDonald: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Advance Auto Parts Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nDennis: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nJane: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Planet Hollywood Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nHarvey: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: Sony Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nNinfa: Hobby: Quilting Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nAngelica: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Planet Hollywood Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \n\nJaxon Prentice's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Micah Stevens said: \"Hey there! My name's Micah. That's quite a shindig, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Nice to meet you, Micah! I'm Jaxon. Yeah, what a great party, isn't it? By the way, you look like the person who enjoys being active. Do you like any kind of sport or hobby?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I actually love brewing beer at home, it's like my own little science experiment. Know anyone who's into that too?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Micah Stevens and Jaxon Prentice\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nJaxon Prentice's background: \nMicah Stevens's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDavid: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Christian Moerlein Brewing Company Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nLarry: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nLynn: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Cray Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nDonald: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Advance Auto Parts Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nDennis: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nJane: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Planet Hollywood Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nHarvey: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: Sony Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nNinfa: Hobby: Quilting Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nAngelica: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Planet Hollywood Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \n\nJaxon Prentice's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Micah Stevens said: \"Hey there! My name's Micah. That's quite a shindig, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Nice to meet you, Micah! I'm Jaxon. Yeah, what a great party, isn't it? By the way, you look like the person who enjoys being active. Do you like any kind of sport or hobby?\"\n\nTurn #2: Micah Stevens said: \"I actually love brewing beer at home, it's like my own little science experiment. Know anyone who's into that too?\"\n\nTurn #3: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Brewing beer at home, huh? That's something special! I can see how it would be like a science experiment. Though none of my friends are into home brewing, my friend Harvey's quite into amateur radio. It's sort of a different science experiment, I guess. I reckon brew masters and amateur radio hobbyists might share the same level of patience and attention to detail? Do you know any amateur radio enthusiasts like Harvey?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oh, speaking of amateur radios, I'm indeed acquainted with a couple of folks who share that interest. One of them is Dennis. He works at The J.M. Smucker Company, prefers to operate in the morning, usually outdoors. The other one is Harvey, who actually works at Sony and operates mostly in the afternoons, indoors. Seems like each has their own approach, yet they all share the same excitement for it. What about your friend Harvey, does he have any particular preferences when it comes to his hobby?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Micah Stevens and Jaxon Prentice\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nJaxon Prentice's background: \nMicah Stevens's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDavid: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Christian Moerlein Brewing Company Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nLarry: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nLynn: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Cray Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nDonald: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Advance Auto Parts Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nDennis: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nJane: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Planet Hollywood Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nHarvey: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: Sony Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nNinfa: Hobby: Quilting Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nAngelica: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Planet Hollywood Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \n\nJaxon Prentice's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Micah Stevens said: \"Hey there! My name's Micah. That's quite a shindig, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Nice to meet you, Micah! I'm Jaxon. Yeah, what a great party, isn't it? By the way, you look like the person who enjoys being active. Do you like any kind of sport or hobby?\"\n\nTurn #2: Micah Stevens said: \"I actually love brewing beer at home, it's like my own little science experiment. Know anyone who's into that too?\"\n\nTurn #3: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Brewing beer at home, huh? That's something special! I can see how it would be like a science experiment. Though none of my friends are into home brewing, my friend Harvey's quite into amateur radio. It's sort of a different science experiment, I guess. I reckon brew masters and amateur radio hobbyists might share the same level of patience and attention to detail? Do you know any amateur radio enthusiasts like Harvey?\"\n\nTurn #4: Micah Stevens said: \"Oh, speaking of amateur radios, I'm indeed acquainted with a couple of folks who share that interest. One of them is Dennis. He works at The J.M. Smucker Company, prefers to operate in the morning, usually outdoors. The other one is Harvey, who actually works at Sony and operates mostly in the afternoons, indoors. Seems like each has their own approach, yet they all share the same excitement for it. What about your friend Harvey, does he have any particular preferences when it comes to his hobby?\"\n\nTurn #5: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Yes, indeed! Harvey prefers his amateur radio sessions in the afternoon, usually indoor. Sounds like he and your friend Harvey have similar habits. And your mention of Dennis in The J.M. Smucker Company reminds me of a friend I know, Blake, who's crazy about dancing and also works at the J.M. Smucker Company. Do you happen to know him?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Actually, there's another friend of mine at The J.M. Smucker Company who's into a unique hobby - Ninfa enjoys quilting, loves doing it in the morning, and preferably outdoors. Sounds kind of relaxing, doesn't it? But I can't say I know a Blake over there. Is he into any other hobbies aside from dancing? I find the various interests of my friends always present fascinating conversational pieces.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Micah Stevens and Jaxon Prentice\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nJaxon Prentice's background: \nMicah Stevens's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDavid: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Christian Moerlein Brewing Company Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nLarry: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nLynn: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Cray Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nDonald: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Advance Auto Parts Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nDennis: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nJane: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Planet Hollywood Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nHarvey: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: Sony Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nNinfa: Hobby: Quilting Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nAngelica: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Planet Hollywood Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \n\nJaxon Prentice's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Micah Stevens said: \"Hey there! My name's Micah. That's quite a shindig, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Nice to meet you, Micah! I'm Jaxon. Yeah, what a great party, isn't it? By the way, you look like the person who enjoys being active. Do you like any kind of sport or hobby?\"\n\nTurn #2: Micah Stevens said: \"I actually love brewing beer at home, it's like my own little science experiment. Know anyone who's into that too?\"\n\nTurn #3: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Brewing beer at home, huh? That's something special! I can see how it would be like a science experiment. Though none of my friends are into home brewing, my friend Harvey's quite into amateur radio. It's sort of a different science experiment, I guess. I reckon brew masters and amateur radio hobbyists might share the same level of patience and attention to detail? Do you know any amateur radio enthusiasts like Harvey?\"\n\nTurn #4: Micah Stevens said: \"Oh, speaking of amateur radios, I'm indeed acquainted with a couple of folks who share that interest. One of them is Dennis. He works at The J.M. Smucker Company, prefers to operate in the morning, usually outdoors. The other one is Harvey, who actually works at Sony and operates mostly in the afternoons, indoors. Seems like each has their own approach, yet they all share the same excitement for it. What about your friend Harvey, does he have any particular preferences when it comes to his hobby?\"\n\nTurn #5: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Yes, indeed! Harvey prefers his amateur radio sessions in the afternoon, usually indoor. Sounds like he and your friend Harvey have similar habits. And your mention of Dennis in The J.M. Smucker Company reminds me of a friend I know, Blake, who's crazy about dancing and also works at the J.M. Smucker Company. Do you happen to know him?\"\n\nTurn #6: Micah Stevens said: \"Actually, there's another friend of mine at The J.M. Smucker Company who's into a unique hobby - Ninfa enjoys quilting, loves doing it in the morning, and preferably outdoors. Sounds kind of relaxing, doesn't it? But I can't say I know a Blake over there. Is he into any other hobbies aside from dancing? I find the various interests of my friends always present fascinating conversational pieces.\"\n\nTurn #7: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Quilting does sound rather soothing, I must say! As for Blake, aside from his love for dancing, he's a regular gym-goer. I think it complements his love for physical expression. Interesting how diverse hobbies can be, right? Remember how you mentioned Dennis from The J.M. Smucker Company? I wonder if he might have crossed paths with my friend Blake. They could have had some intriguing conversations about their passion for hobbies.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's indeed a distinct contrast in hobbies, Blake seems like an interesting person. Speaking of diversity, I also have a friend Jane who values her pastimes greatly. She's into the art of homebrewing and works at Planet Hollywood. She often brews in the morning, outdoors. Dancing and brewing, believe it or not, I think they might find some common ground in their dedication to their hobbies. Maybe they've already run into each other at a hobby event or something.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Micah Stevens and Jaxon Prentice\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nJaxon Prentice's background: \nMicah Stevens's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDavid: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Christian Moerlein Brewing Company Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nLarry: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nLynn: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Cray Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nDonald: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Advance Auto Parts Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nDennis: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nJane: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Planet Hollywood Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nHarvey: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: Sony Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nNinfa: Hobby: Quilting Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nAngelica: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Planet Hollywood Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \n\nJaxon Prentice's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Micah Stevens said: \"Hey there! My name's Micah. That's quite a shindig, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Nice to meet you, Micah! I'm Jaxon. Yeah, what a great party, isn't it? By the way, you look like the person who enjoys being active. Do you like any kind of sport or hobby?\"\n\nTurn #2: Micah Stevens said: \"I actually love brewing beer at home, it's like my own little science experiment. Know anyone who's into that too?\"\n\nTurn #3: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Brewing beer at home, huh? That's something special! I can see how it would be like a science experiment. Though none of my friends are into home brewing, my friend Harvey's quite into amateur radio. It's sort of a different science experiment, I guess. I reckon brew masters and amateur radio hobbyists might share the same level of patience and attention to detail? Do you know any amateur radio enthusiasts like Harvey?\"\n\nTurn #4: Micah Stevens said: \"Oh, speaking of amateur radios, I'm indeed acquainted with a couple of folks who share that interest. One of them is Dennis. He works at The J.M. Smucker Company, prefers to operate in the morning, usually outdoors. The other one is Harvey, who actually works at Sony and operates mostly in the afternoons, indoors. Seems like each has their own approach, yet they all share the same excitement for it. What about your friend Harvey, does he have any particular preferences when it comes to his hobby?\"\n\nTurn #5: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Yes, indeed! Harvey prefers his amateur radio sessions in the afternoon, usually indoor. Sounds like he and your friend Harvey have similar habits. And your mention of Dennis in The J.M. Smucker Company reminds me of a friend I know, Blake, who's crazy about dancing and also works at the J.M. Smucker Company. Do you happen to know him?\"\n\nTurn #6: Micah Stevens said: \"Actually, there's another friend of mine at The J.M. Smucker Company who's into a unique hobby - Ninfa enjoys quilting, loves doing it in the morning, and preferably outdoors. Sounds kind of relaxing, doesn't it? But I can't say I know a Blake over there. Is he into any other hobbies aside from dancing? I find the various interests of my friends always present fascinating conversational pieces.\"\n\nTurn #7: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Quilting does sound rather soothing, I must say! As for Blake, aside from his love for dancing, he's a regular gym-goer. I think it complements his love for physical expression. Interesting how diverse hobbies can be, right? Remember how you mentioned Dennis from The J.M. Smucker Company? I wonder if he might have crossed paths with my friend Blake. They could have had some intriguing conversations about their passion for hobbies.\"\n\nTurn #8: Micah Stevens said: \"That's indeed a distinct contrast in hobbies, Blake seems like an interesting person. Speaking of diversity, I also have a friend Jane who values her pastimes greatly. She's into the art of homebrewing and works at Planet Hollywood. She often brews in the morning, outdoors. Dancing and brewing, believe it or not, I think they might find some common ground in their dedication to their hobbies. Maybe they've already run into each other at a hobby event or something.\"\n\nTurn #9: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Ah, brewing and dancing, that's certainly a mix of skill and finesse required there. I haven't met too many brewers, but dancers, I know a few. Jane's brewing hobby makes me think of a friend, Louise. She's passionate about dancing and works at Cray. She usually does her dancing practice outdoors, just like Jane, your homebrewing friend, but in the evenings rather than mornings. Maybe they've met at an outdoor function. Do you know a Louise from Cray by any chance?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You know, it's a small world, we might very well have mutual friends. Speaking of Cray, it turns out I have a friend, Lynn, who works there and loves homebrewing like Jane. She usually practices her brewing skills outdoors, but unlike your friend hers is in the evenings. Given their similar settings and mutual appreciation for crafting something with their hands, there's a good chance Lynn and Louise might have crossed paths at some point. And of course, if she's friends with Blake too, all the better! After all, what's a party without a bit of dancing?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Micah Stevens and Jaxon Prentice\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nJaxon Prentice's background: \nMicah Stevens's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDavid: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Christian Moerlein Brewing Company Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nLarry: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nLynn: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Cray Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nDonald: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Advance Auto Parts Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nDennis: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nJane: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Planet Hollywood Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nHarvey: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: Sony Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nNinfa: Hobby: Quilting Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nAngelica: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Planet Hollywood Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \n\nJaxon Prentice's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Micah Stevens said: \"Hey there! My name's Micah. That's quite a shindig, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Nice to meet you, Micah! I'm Jaxon. Yeah, what a great party, isn't it? By the way, you look like the person who enjoys being active. Do you like any kind of sport or hobby?\"\n\nTurn #2: Micah Stevens said: \"I actually love brewing beer at home, it's like my own little science experiment. Know anyone who's into that too?\"\n\nTurn #3: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Brewing beer at home, huh? That's something special! I can see how it would be like a science experiment. Though none of my friends are into home brewing, my friend Harvey's quite into amateur radio. It's sort of a different science experiment, I guess. I reckon brew masters and amateur radio hobbyists might share the same level of patience and attention to detail? Do you know any amateur radio enthusiasts like Harvey?\"\n\nTurn #4: Micah Stevens said: \"Oh, speaking of amateur radios, I'm indeed acquainted with a couple of folks who share that interest. One of them is Dennis. He works at The J.M. Smucker Company, prefers to operate in the morning, usually outdoors. The other one is Harvey, who actually works at Sony and operates mostly in the afternoons, indoors. Seems like each has their own approach, yet they all share the same excitement for it. What about your friend Harvey, does he have any particular preferences when it comes to his hobby?\"\n\nTurn #5: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Yes, indeed! Harvey prefers his amateur radio sessions in the afternoon, usually indoor. Sounds like he and your friend Harvey have similar habits. And your mention of Dennis in The J.M. Smucker Company reminds me of a friend I know, Blake, who's crazy about dancing and also works at the J.M. Smucker Company. Do you happen to know him?\"\n\nTurn #6: Micah Stevens said: \"Actually, there's another friend of mine at The J.M. Smucker Company who's into a unique hobby - Ninfa enjoys quilting, loves doing it in the morning, and preferably outdoors. Sounds kind of relaxing, doesn't it? But I can't say I know a Blake over there. Is he into any other hobbies aside from dancing? I find the various interests of my friends always present fascinating conversational pieces.\"\n\nTurn #7: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Quilting does sound rather soothing, I must say! As for Blake, aside from his love for dancing, he's a regular gym-goer. I think it complements his love for physical expression. Interesting how diverse hobbies can be, right? Remember how you mentioned Dennis from The J.M. Smucker Company? I wonder if he might have crossed paths with my friend Blake. They could have had some intriguing conversations about their passion for hobbies.\"\n\nTurn #8: Micah Stevens said: \"That's indeed a distinct contrast in hobbies, Blake seems like an interesting person. Speaking of diversity, I also have a friend Jane who values her pastimes greatly. She's into the art of homebrewing and works at Planet Hollywood. She often brews in the morning, outdoors. Dancing and brewing, believe it or not, I think they might find some common ground in their dedication to their hobbies. Maybe they've already run into each other at a hobby event or something.\"\n\nTurn #9: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Ah, brewing and dancing, that's certainly a mix of skill and finesse required there. I haven't met too many brewers, but dancers, I know a few. Jane's brewing hobby makes me think of a friend, Louise. She's passionate about dancing and works at Cray. She usually does her dancing practice outdoors, just like Jane, your homebrewing friend, but in the evenings rather than mornings. Maybe they've met at an outdoor function. Do you know a Louise from Cray by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #10: Micah Stevens said: \"You know, it's a small world, we might very well have mutual friends. Speaking of Cray, it turns out I have a friend, Lynn, who works there and loves homebrewing like Jane. She usually practices her brewing skills outdoors, but unlike your friend hers is in the evenings. Given their similar settings and mutual appreciation for crafting something with their hands, there's a good chance Lynn and Louise might have crossed paths at some point. And of course, if she's friends with Blake too, all the better! After all, what's a party without a bit of dancing?\"\n\nTurn #11: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Indeed, it is a small world, Micah! The name Lynn does ring a bell, especially as you mentioned she's from Cray and loves homebrewing. I'll have to mention Lynn to Louise next time we see each other and confirm if they have met at an evening outdoor function. And you're absolutely right, what's a party without some dancing? It's been a pleasure meeting you, Micah, and who knows, maybe we'll realize we have more mutual friends in the future!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"It was a pleasure to meet you too, Jaxon! Yes, who knows, the world is smaller than we think. We'll certainly bump into each other again and maybe even at a gathering with some of our mutual friends. All the best, and enjoy the rest of the party!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Micah Stevens, your task is to act/speak as Micah Stevens would, keeping in mind Micah Stevens's social goal.\nYou can find Micah Stevens's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Micah Stevens's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Micah Stevens's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Micah Stevens and Jaxon Prentice\nMicah Stevens's background: Micah Stevens is a 25-year-old male pharmacist. He/him pronouns. Micah Stevens has a great taste for fashion. Personality and values description: Micah Stevens is imaginative and extraverted but can also be impulsive. He values power and fairness and often follows an intuitive decision-making approach. Micah's secrets: He secretly loves to dress up his dog.\nJaxon Prentice's background: \nMicah Stevens's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDavid: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Christian Moerlein Brewing Company Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nLarry: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nLynn: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Cray Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nDonald: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Advance Auto Parts Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nDennis: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nJane: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Planet Hollywood Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nHarvey: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: Sony Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nNinfa: Hobby: Quilting Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nAngelica: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Planet Hollywood Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \n\nJaxon Prentice's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Micah Stevens said: \"Hey there! My name's Micah. That's quite a shindig, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Nice to meet you, Micah! I'm Jaxon. Yeah, what a great party, isn't it? By the way, you look like the person who enjoys being active. Do you like any kind of sport or hobby?\"\n\nTurn #2: Micah Stevens said: \"I actually love brewing beer at home, it's like my own little science experiment. Know anyone who's into that too?\"\n\nTurn #3: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Brewing beer at home, huh? That's something special! I can see how it would be like a science experiment. Though none of my friends are into home brewing, my friend Harvey's quite into amateur radio. It's sort of a different science experiment, I guess. I reckon brew masters and amateur radio hobbyists might share the same level of patience and attention to detail? Do you know any amateur radio enthusiasts like Harvey?\"\n\nTurn #4: Micah Stevens said: \"Oh, speaking of amateur radios, I'm indeed acquainted with a couple of folks who share that interest. One of them is Dennis. He works at The J.M. Smucker Company, prefers to operate in the morning, usually outdoors. The other one is Harvey, who actually works at Sony and operates mostly in the afternoons, indoors. Seems like each has their own approach, yet they all share the same excitement for it. What about your friend Harvey, does he have any particular preferences when it comes to his hobby?\"\n\nTurn #5: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Yes, indeed! Harvey prefers his amateur radio sessions in the afternoon, usually indoor. Sounds like he and your friend Harvey have similar habits. And your mention of Dennis in The J.M. Smucker Company reminds me of a friend I know, Blake, who's crazy about dancing and also works at the J.M. Smucker Company. Do you happen to know him?\"\n\nTurn #6: Micah Stevens said: \"Actually, there's another friend of mine at The J.M. Smucker Company who's into a unique hobby - Ninfa enjoys quilting, loves doing it in the morning, and preferably outdoors. Sounds kind of relaxing, doesn't it? But I can't say I know a Blake over there. Is he into any other hobbies aside from dancing? I find the various interests of my friends always present fascinating conversational pieces.\"\n\nTurn #7: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Quilting does sound rather soothing, I must say! As for Blake, aside from his love for dancing, he's a regular gym-goer. I think it complements his love for physical expression. Interesting how diverse hobbies can be, right? Remember how you mentioned Dennis from The J.M. Smucker Company? I wonder if he might have crossed paths with my friend Blake. They could have had some intriguing conversations about their passion for hobbies.\"\n\nTurn #8: Micah Stevens said: \"That's indeed a distinct contrast in hobbies, Blake seems like an interesting person. Speaking of diversity, I also have a friend Jane who values her pastimes greatly. She's into the art of homebrewing and works at Planet Hollywood. She often brews in the morning, outdoors. Dancing and brewing, believe it or not, I think they might find some common ground in their dedication to their hobbies. Maybe they've already run into each other at a hobby event or something.\"\n\nTurn #9: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Ah, brewing and dancing, that's certainly a mix of skill and finesse required there. I haven't met too many brewers, but dancers, I know a few. Jane's brewing hobby makes me think of a friend, Louise. She's passionate about dancing and works at Cray. She usually does her dancing practice outdoors, just like Jane, your homebrewing friend, but in the evenings rather than mornings. Maybe they've met at an outdoor function. Do you know a Louise from Cray by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #10: Micah Stevens said: \"You know, it's a small world, we might very well have mutual friends. Speaking of Cray, it turns out I have a friend, Lynn, who works there and loves homebrewing like Jane. She usually practices her brewing skills outdoors, but unlike your friend hers is in the evenings. Given their similar settings and mutual appreciation for crafting something with their hands, there's a good chance Lynn and Louise might have crossed paths at some point. And of course, if she's friends with Blake too, all the better! After all, what's a party without a bit of dancing?\"\n\nTurn #11: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Indeed, it is a small world, Micah! The name Lynn does ring a bell, especially as you mentioned she's from Cray and loves homebrewing. I'll have to mention Lynn to Louise next time we see each other and confirm if they have met at an evening outdoor function. And you're absolutely right, what's a party without some dancing? It's been a pleasure meeting you, Micah, and who knows, maybe we'll realize we have more mutual friends in the future!\"\n\nTurn #12: Micah Stevens said: \"It was a pleasure to meet you too, Jaxon! Yes, who knows, the world is smaller than we think. We'll certainly bump into each other again and maybe even at a gathering with some of our mutual friends. All the best, and enjoy the rest of the party!\"\n\nTurn #13: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Absolutely, Micah! It would be great to bump into each other again and especially with some of our mutual friends. Enjoy the rest of the party and take care!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Jaxon Prentice, your task is to act/speak as Jaxon Prentice would, keeping in mind Jaxon Prentice's social goal.\nYou can find Jaxon Prentice's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Jaxon Prentice's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Jaxon Prentice's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Micah Stevens and Jaxon Prentice\nMicah Stevens's background: \nJaxon Prentice's background: Jaxon Prentice is a 40-year-old male investigative journalist. He/him pronouns. Jaxon Prentice, an investigative journalist, is known for his brisk jogging sessions early in the morning and his active participation in community functions. Personality and values description: Jaxon Prentice, outgoing yet erratic, emphasizes achievement, power, and security. His decisions swing between quick adaptations to situations and careful planning. Jaxon's secrets: Fabricated evidence to incriminate a corrupt politician\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nJaxon Prentice's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMarie: Hobby: Acting Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nHarvey: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: Sony Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nFrank: Hobby: Deltiology Company: Ebonite International Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nVera: Hobby: Watching movies Company: Gentiva Health Services Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nLawrence: Hobby: Kayaking Company: Ebonite International Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nLouise: Hobby: Dancing Company: Cray Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nDallas: Hobby: Dancing Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nNancy: Hobby: Dancing Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nBlake: Hobby: Dancing Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Micah Stevens said: \"Hey there! My name's Micah. That's quite a shindig, isn't it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Nice to meet you, Micah! I'm Jaxon. Yeah, what a great party, isn't it? By the way, you look like the person who enjoys being active. Do you like any kind of sport or hobby?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Jaxon Prentice, your task is to act/speak as Jaxon Prentice would, keeping in mind Jaxon Prentice's social goal.\nYou can find Jaxon Prentice's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Jaxon Prentice's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Jaxon Prentice's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Micah Stevens and Jaxon Prentice\nMicah Stevens's background: \nJaxon Prentice's background: Jaxon Prentice is a 40-year-old male investigative journalist. He/him pronouns. Jaxon Prentice, an investigative journalist, is known for his brisk jogging sessions early in the morning and his active participation in community functions. Personality and values description: Jaxon Prentice, outgoing yet erratic, emphasizes achievement, power, and security. His decisions swing between quick adaptations to situations and careful planning. Jaxon's secrets: Fabricated evidence to incriminate a corrupt politician\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nJaxon Prentice's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMarie: Hobby: Acting Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nHarvey: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: Sony Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nFrank: Hobby: Deltiology Company: Ebonite International Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nVera: Hobby: Watching movies Company: Gentiva Health Services Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nLawrence: Hobby: Kayaking Company: Ebonite International Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nLouise: Hobby: Dancing Company: Cray Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nDallas: Hobby: Dancing Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nNancy: Hobby: Dancing Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nBlake: Hobby: Dancing Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Micah Stevens said: \"Hey there! My name's Micah. That's quite a shindig, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Nice to meet you, Micah! I'm Jaxon. Yeah, what a great party, isn't it? By the way, you look like the person who enjoys being active. Do you like any kind of sport or hobby?\"\n\nTurn #2: Micah Stevens said: \"I actually love brewing beer at home, it's like my own little science experiment. Know anyone who's into that too?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Brewing beer at home, huh? That's something special! I can see how it would be like a science experiment. Though none of my friends are into home brewing, my friend Harvey's quite into amateur radio. It's sort of a different science experiment, I guess. I reckon brew masters and amateur radio hobbyists might share the same level of patience and attention to detail? Do you know any amateur radio enthusiasts like Harvey?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Jaxon Prentice, your task is to act/speak as Jaxon Prentice would, keeping in mind Jaxon Prentice's social goal.\nYou can find Jaxon Prentice's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Jaxon Prentice's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Jaxon Prentice's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Micah Stevens and Jaxon Prentice\nMicah Stevens's background: \nJaxon Prentice's background: Jaxon Prentice is a 40-year-old male investigative journalist. He/him pronouns. Jaxon Prentice, an investigative journalist, is known for his brisk jogging sessions early in the morning and his active participation in community functions. Personality and values description: Jaxon Prentice, outgoing yet erratic, emphasizes achievement, power, and security. His decisions swing between quick adaptations to situations and careful planning. Jaxon's secrets: Fabricated evidence to incriminate a corrupt politician\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nJaxon Prentice's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMarie: Hobby: Acting Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nHarvey: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: Sony Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nFrank: Hobby: Deltiology Company: Ebonite International Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nVera: Hobby: Watching movies Company: Gentiva Health Services Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nLawrence: Hobby: Kayaking Company: Ebonite International Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nLouise: Hobby: Dancing Company: Cray Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nDallas: Hobby: Dancing Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nNancy: Hobby: Dancing Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nBlake: Hobby: Dancing Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Micah Stevens said: \"Hey there! My name's Micah. That's quite a shindig, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Nice to meet you, Micah! I'm Jaxon. Yeah, what a great party, isn't it? By the way, you look like the person who enjoys being active. Do you like any kind of sport or hobby?\"\n\nTurn #2: Micah Stevens said: \"I actually love brewing beer at home, it's like my own little science experiment. Know anyone who's into that too?\"\n\nTurn #3: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Brewing beer at home, huh? That's something special! I can see how it would be like a science experiment. Though none of my friends are into home brewing, my friend Harvey's quite into amateur radio. It's sort of a different science experiment, I guess. I reckon brew masters and amateur radio hobbyists might share the same level of patience and attention to detail? Do you know any amateur radio enthusiasts like Harvey?\"\n\nTurn #4: Micah Stevens said: \"Oh, speaking of amateur radios, I'm indeed acquainted with a couple of folks who share that interest. One of them is Dennis. He works at The J.M. Smucker Company, prefers to operate in the morning, usually outdoors. The other one is Harvey, who actually works at Sony and operates mostly in the afternoons, indoors. Seems like each has their own approach, yet they all share the same excitement for it. What about your friend Harvey, does he have any particular preferences when it comes to his hobby?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Yes, indeed! Harvey prefers his amateur radio sessions in the afternoon, usually indoor. Sounds like he and your friend Harvey have similar habits. And your mention of Dennis in The J.M. Smucker Company reminds me of a friend I know, Blake, who's crazy about dancing and also works at the J.M. Smucker Company. Do you happen to know him?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Jaxon Prentice, your task is to act/speak as Jaxon Prentice would, keeping in mind Jaxon Prentice's social goal.\nYou can find Jaxon Prentice's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Jaxon Prentice's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Jaxon Prentice's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Micah Stevens and Jaxon Prentice\nMicah Stevens's background: \nJaxon Prentice's background: Jaxon Prentice is a 40-year-old male investigative journalist. He/him pronouns. Jaxon Prentice, an investigative journalist, is known for his brisk jogging sessions early in the morning and his active participation in community functions. Personality and values description: Jaxon Prentice, outgoing yet erratic, emphasizes achievement, power, and security. His decisions swing between quick adaptations to situations and careful planning. Jaxon's secrets: Fabricated evidence to incriminate a corrupt politician\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nJaxon Prentice's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMarie: Hobby: Acting Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nHarvey: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: Sony Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nFrank: Hobby: Deltiology Company: Ebonite International Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nVera: Hobby: Watching movies Company: Gentiva Health Services Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nLawrence: Hobby: Kayaking Company: Ebonite International Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nLouise: Hobby: Dancing Company: Cray Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nDallas: Hobby: Dancing Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nNancy: Hobby: Dancing Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nBlake: Hobby: Dancing Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Micah Stevens said: \"Hey there! My name's Micah. That's quite a shindig, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Nice to meet you, Micah! I'm Jaxon. Yeah, what a great party, isn't it? By the way, you look like the person who enjoys being active. Do you like any kind of sport or hobby?\"\n\nTurn #2: Micah Stevens said: \"I actually love brewing beer at home, it's like my own little science experiment. Know anyone who's into that too?\"\n\nTurn #3: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Brewing beer at home, huh? That's something special! I can see how it would be like a science experiment. Though none of my friends are into home brewing, my friend Harvey's quite into amateur radio. It's sort of a different science experiment, I guess. I reckon brew masters and amateur radio hobbyists might share the same level of patience and attention to detail? Do you know any amateur radio enthusiasts like Harvey?\"\n\nTurn #4: Micah Stevens said: \"Oh, speaking of amateur radios, I'm indeed acquainted with a couple of folks who share that interest. One of them is Dennis. He works at The J.M. Smucker Company, prefers to operate in the morning, usually outdoors. The other one is Harvey, who actually works at Sony and operates mostly in the afternoons, indoors. Seems like each has their own approach, yet they all share the same excitement for it. What about your friend Harvey, does he have any particular preferences when it comes to his hobby?\"\n\nTurn #5: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Yes, indeed! Harvey prefers his amateur radio sessions in the afternoon, usually indoor. Sounds like he and your friend Harvey have similar habits. And your mention of Dennis in The J.M. Smucker Company reminds me of a friend I know, Blake, who's crazy about dancing and also works at the J.M. Smucker Company. Do you happen to know him?\"\n\nTurn #6: Micah Stevens said: \"Actually, there's another friend of mine at The J.M. Smucker Company who's into a unique hobby - Ninfa enjoys quilting, loves doing it in the morning, and preferably outdoors. Sounds kind of relaxing, doesn't it? But I can't say I know a Blake over there. Is he into any other hobbies aside from dancing? I find the various interests of my friends always present fascinating conversational pieces.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Quilting does sound rather soothing, I must say! As for Blake, aside from his love for dancing, he's a regular gym-goer. I think it complements his love for physical expression. Interesting how diverse hobbies can be, right? Remember how you mentioned Dennis from The J.M. Smucker Company? I wonder if he might have crossed paths with my friend Blake. They could have had some intriguing conversations about their passion for hobbies.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Jaxon Prentice, your task is to act/speak as Jaxon Prentice would, keeping in mind Jaxon Prentice's social goal.\nYou can find Jaxon Prentice's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Jaxon Prentice's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Jaxon Prentice's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Micah Stevens and Jaxon Prentice\nMicah Stevens's background: \nJaxon Prentice's background: Jaxon Prentice is a 40-year-old male investigative journalist. He/him pronouns. Jaxon Prentice, an investigative journalist, is known for his brisk jogging sessions early in the morning and his active participation in community functions. Personality and values description: Jaxon Prentice, outgoing yet erratic, emphasizes achievement, power, and security. His decisions swing between quick adaptations to situations and careful planning. Jaxon's secrets: Fabricated evidence to incriminate a corrupt politician\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nJaxon Prentice's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMarie: Hobby: Acting Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nHarvey: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: Sony Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nFrank: Hobby: Deltiology Company: Ebonite International Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nVera: Hobby: Watching movies Company: Gentiva Health Services Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nLawrence: Hobby: Kayaking Company: Ebonite International Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nLouise: Hobby: Dancing Company: Cray Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nDallas: Hobby: Dancing Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nNancy: Hobby: Dancing Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nBlake: Hobby: Dancing Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Micah Stevens said: \"Hey there! My name's Micah. That's quite a shindig, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Nice to meet you, Micah! I'm Jaxon. Yeah, what a great party, isn't it? By the way, you look like the person who enjoys being active. Do you like any kind of sport or hobby?\"\n\nTurn #2: Micah Stevens said: \"I actually love brewing beer at home, it's like my own little science experiment. Know anyone who's into that too?\"\n\nTurn #3: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Brewing beer at home, huh? That's something special! I can see how it would be like a science experiment. Though none of my friends are into home brewing, my friend Harvey's quite into amateur radio. It's sort of a different science experiment, I guess. I reckon brew masters and amateur radio hobbyists might share the same level of patience and attention to detail? Do you know any amateur radio enthusiasts like Harvey?\"\n\nTurn #4: Micah Stevens said: \"Oh, speaking of amateur radios, I'm indeed acquainted with a couple of folks who share that interest. One of them is Dennis. He works at The J.M. Smucker Company, prefers to operate in the morning, usually outdoors. The other one is Harvey, who actually works at Sony and operates mostly in the afternoons, indoors. Seems like each has their own approach, yet they all share the same excitement for it. What about your friend Harvey, does he have any particular preferences when it comes to his hobby?\"\n\nTurn #5: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Yes, indeed! Harvey prefers his amateur radio sessions in the afternoon, usually indoor. Sounds like he and your friend Harvey have similar habits. And your mention of Dennis in The J.M. Smucker Company reminds me of a friend I know, Blake, who's crazy about dancing and also works at the J.M. Smucker Company. Do you happen to know him?\"\n\nTurn #6: Micah Stevens said: \"Actually, there's another friend of mine at The J.M. Smucker Company who's into a unique hobby - Ninfa enjoys quilting, loves doing it in the morning, and preferably outdoors. Sounds kind of relaxing, doesn't it? But I can't say I know a Blake over there. Is he into any other hobbies aside from dancing? I find the various interests of my friends always present fascinating conversational pieces.\"\n\nTurn #7: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Quilting does sound rather soothing, I must say! As for Blake, aside from his love for dancing, he's a regular gym-goer. I think it complements his love for physical expression. Interesting how diverse hobbies can be, right? Remember how you mentioned Dennis from The J.M. Smucker Company? I wonder if he might have crossed paths with my friend Blake. They could have had some intriguing conversations about their passion for hobbies.\"\n\nTurn #8: Micah Stevens said: \"That's indeed a distinct contrast in hobbies, Blake seems like an interesting person. Speaking of diversity, I also have a friend Jane who values her pastimes greatly. She's into the art of homebrewing and works at Planet Hollywood. She often brews in the morning, outdoors. Dancing and brewing, believe it or not, I think they might find some common ground in their dedication to their hobbies. Maybe they've already run into each other at a hobby event or something.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ah, brewing and dancing, that's certainly a mix of skill and finesse required there. I haven't met too many brewers, but dancers, I know a few. Jane's brewing hobby makes me think of a friend, Louise. She's passionate about dancing and works at Cray. She usually does her dancing practice outdoors, just like Jane, your homebrewing friend, but in the evenings rather than mornings. Maybe they've met at an outdoor function. Do you know a Louise from Cray by any chance?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Jaxon Prentice, your task is to act/speak as Jaxon Prentice would, keeping in mind Jaxon Prentice's social goal.\nYou can find Jaxon Prentice's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Jaxon Prentice's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Jaxon Prentice's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Micah Stevens and Jaxon Prentice\nMicah Stevens's background: \nJaxon Prentice's background: Jaxon Prentice is a 40-year-old male investigative journalist. He/him pronouns. Jaxon Prentice, an investigative journalist, is known for his brisk jogging sessions early in the morning and his active participation in community functions. Personality and values description: Jaxon Prentice, outgoing yet erratic, emphasizes achievement, power, and security. His decisions swing between quick adaptations to situations and careful planning. Jaxon's secrets: Fabricated evidence to incriminate a corrupt politician\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nJaxon Prentice's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMarie: Hobby: Acting Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nHarvey: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: Sony Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nFrank: Hobby: Deltiology Company: Ebonite International Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nVera: Hobby: Watching movies Company: Gentiva Health Services Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nLawrence: Hobby: Kayaking Company: Ebonite International Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nLouise: Hobby: Dancing Company: Cray Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nDallas: Hobby: Dancing Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nNancy: Hobby: Dancing Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nBlake: Hobby: Dancing Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Micah Stevens said: \"Hey there! My name's Micah. That's quite a shindig, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Nice to meet you, Micah! I'm Jaxon. Yeah, what a great party, isn't it? By the way, you look like the person who enjoys being active. Do you like any kind of sport or hobby?\"\n\nTurn #2: Micah Stevens said: \"I actually love brewing beer at home, it's like my own little science experiment. Know anyone who's into that too?\"\n\nTurn #3: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Brewing beer at home, huh? That's something special! I can see how it would be like a science experiment. Though none of my friends are into home brewing, my friend Harvey's quite into amateur radio. It's sort of a different science experiment, I guess. I reckon brew masters and amateur radio hobbyists might share the same level of patience and attention to detail? Do you know any amateur radio enthusiasts like Harvey?\"\n\nTurn #4: Micah Stevens said: \"Oh, speaking of amateur radios, I'm indeed acquainted with a couple of folks who share that interest. One of them is Dennis. He works at The J.M. Smucker Company, prefers to operate in the morning, usually outdoors. The other one is Harvey, who actually works at Sony and operates mostly in the afternoons, indoors. Seems like each has their own approach, yet they all share the same excitement for it. What about your friend Harvey, does he have any particular preferences when it comes to his hobby?\"\n\nTurn #5: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Yes, indeed! Harvey prefers his amateur radio sessions in the afternoon, usually indoor. Sounds like he and your friend Harvey have similar habits. And your mention of Dennis in The J.M. Smucker Company reminds me of a friend I know, Blake, who's crazy about dancing and also works at the J.M. Smucker Company. Do you happen to know him?\"\n\nTurn #6: Micah Stevens said: \"Actually, there's another friend of mine at The J.M. Smucker Company who's into a unique hobby - Ninfa enjoys quilting, loves doing it in the morning, and preferably outdoors. Sounds kind of relaxing, doesn't it? But I can't say I know a Blake over there. Is he into any other hobbies aside from dancing? I find the various interests of my friends always present fascinating conversational pieces.\"\n\nTurn #7: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Quilting does sound rather soothing, I must say! As for Blake, aside from his love for dancing, he's a regular gym-goer. I think it complements his love for physical expression. Interesting how diverse hobbies can be, right? Remember how you mentioned Dennis from The J.M. Smucker Company? I wonder if he might have crossed paths with my friend Blake. They could have had some intriguing conversations about their passion for hobbies.\"\n\nTurn #8: Micah Stevens said: \"That's indeed a distinct contrast in hobbies, Blake seems like an interesting person. Speaking of diversity, I also have a friend Jane who values her pastimes greatly. She's into the art of homebrewing and works at Planet Hollywood. She often brews in the morning, outdoors. Dancing and brewing, believe it or not, I think they might find some common ground in their dedication to their hobbies. Maybe they've already run into each other at a hobby event or something.\"\n\nTurn #9: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Ah, brewing and dancing, that's certainly a mix of skill and finesse required there. I haven't met too many brewers, but dancers, I know a few. Jane's brewing hobby makes me think of a friend, Louise. She's passionate about dancing and works at Cray. She usually does her dancing practice outdoors, just like Jane, your homebrewing friend, but in the evenings rather than mornings. Maybe they've met at an outdoor function. Do you know a Louise from Cray by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #10: Micah Stevens said: \"You know, it's a small world, we might very well have mutual friends. Speaking of Cray, it turns out I have a friend, Lynn, who works there and loves homebrewing like Jane. She usually practices her brewing skills outdoors, but unlike your friend hers is in the evenings. Given their similar settings and mutual appreciation for crafting something with their hands, there's a good chance Lynn and Louise might have crossed paths at some point. And of course, if she's friends with Blake too, all the better! After all, what's a party without a bit of dancing?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, it is a small world, Micah! The name Lynn does ring a bell, especially as you mentioned she's from Cray and loves homebrewing. I'll have to mention Lynn to Louise next time we see each other and confirm if they have met at an evening outdoor function. And you're absolutely right, what's a party without some dancing? It's been a pleasure meeting you, Micah, and who knows, maybe we'll realize we have more mutual friends in the future!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Jaxon Prentice, your task is to act/speak as Jaxon Prentice would, keeping in mind Jaxon Prentice's social goal.\nYou can find Jaxon Prentice's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Jaxon Prentice's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Jaxon Prentice's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Micah Stevens and Jaxon Prentice\nMicah Stevens's background: \nJaxon Prentice's background: Jaxon Prentice is a 40-year-old male investigative journalist. He/him pronouns. Jaxon Prentice, an investigative journalist, is known for his brisk jogging sessions early in the morning and his active participation in community functions. Personality and values description: Jaxon Prentice, outgoing yet erratic, emphasizes achievement, power, and security. His decisions swing between quick adaptations to situations and careful planning. Jaxon's secrets: Fabricated evidence to incriminate a corrupt politician\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nJaxon Prentice's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMarie: Hobby: Acting Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nHarvey: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: Sony Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nFrank: Hobby: Deltiology Company: Ebonite International Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nVera: Hobby: Watching movies Company: Gentiva Health Services Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nLawrence: Hobby: Kayaking Company: Ebonite International Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nLouise: Hobby: Dancing Company: Cray Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nDallas: Hobby: Dancing Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nNancy: Hobby: Dancing Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nBlake: Hobby: Dancing Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Micah Stevens said: \"Hey there! My name's Micah. That's quite a shindig, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Nice to meet you, Micah! I'm Jaxon. Yeah, what a great party, isn't it? By the way, you look like the person who enjoys being active. Do you like any kind of sport or hobby?\"\n\nTurn #2: Micah Stevens said: \"I actually love brewing beer at home, it's like my own little science experiment. Know anyone who's into that too?\"\n\nTurn #3: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Brewing beer at home, huh? That's something special! I can see how it would be like a science experiment. Though none of my friends are into home brewing, my friend Harvey's quite into amateur radio. It's sort of a different science experiment, I guess. I reckon brew masters and amateur radio hobbyists might share the same level of patience and attention to detail? Do you know any amateur radio enthusiasts like Harvey?\"\n\nTurn #4: Micah Stevens said: \"Oh, speaking of amateur radios, I'm indeed acquainted with a couple of folks who share that interest. One of them is Dennis. He works at The J.M. Smucker Company, prefers to operate in the morning, usually outdoors. The other one is Harvey, who actually works at Sony and operates mostly in the afternoons, indoors. Seems like each has their own approach, yet they all share the same excitement for it. What about your friend Harvey, does he have any particular preferences when it comes to his hobby?\"\n\nTurn #5: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Yes, indeed! Harvey prefers his amateur radio sessions in the afternoon, usually indoor. Sounds like he and your friend Harvey have similar habits. And your mention of Dennis in The J.M. Smucker Company reminds me of a friend I know, Blake, who's crazy about dancing and also works at the J.M. Smucker Company. Do you happen to know him?\"\n\nTurn #6: Micah Stevens said: \"Actually, there's another friend of mine at The J.M. Smucker Company who's into a unique hobby - Ninfa enjoys quilting, loves doing it in the morning, and preferably outdoors. Sounds kind of relaxing, doesn't it? But I can't say I know a Blake over there. Is he into any other hobbies aside from dancing? I find the various interests of my friends always present fascinating conversational pieces.\"\n\nTurn #7: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Quilting does sound rather soothing, I must say! As for Blake, aside from his love for dancing, he's a regular gym-goer. I think it complements his love for physical expression. Interesting how diverse hobbies can be, right? Remember how you mentioned Dennis from The J.M. Smucker Company? I wonder if he might have crossed paths with my friend Blake. They could have had some intriguing conversations about their passion for hobbies.\"\n\nTurn #8: Micah Stevens said: \"That's indeed a distinct contrast in hobbies, Blake seems like an interesting person. Speaking of diversity, I also have a friend Jane who values her pastimes greatly. She's into the art of homebrewing and works at Planet Hollywood. She often brews in the morning, outdoors. Dancing and brewing, believe it or not, I think they might find some common ground in their dedication to their hobbies. Maybe they've already run into each other at a hobby event or something.\"\n\nTurn #9: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Ah, brewing and dancing, that's certainly a mix of skill and finesse required there. I haven't met too many brewers, but dancers, I know a few. Jane's brewing hobby makes me think of a friend, Louise. She's passionate about dancing and works at Cray. She usually does her dancing practice outdoors, just like Jane, your homebrewing friend, but in the evenings rather than mornings. Maybe they've met at an outdoor function. Do you know a Louise from Cray by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #10: Micah Stevens said: \"You know, it's a small world, we might very well have mutual friends. Speaking of Cray, it turns out I have a friend, Lynn, who works there and loves homebrewing like Jane. She usually practices her brewing skills outdoors, but unlike your friend hers is in the evenings. Given their similar settings and mutual appreciation for crafting something with their hands, there's a good chance Lynn and Louise might have crossed paths at some point. And of course, if she's friends with Blake too, all the better! After all, what's a party without a bit of dancing?\"\n\nTurn #11: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Indeed, it is a small world, Micah! The name Lynn does ring a bell, especially as you mentioned she's from Cray and loves homebrewing. I'll have to mention Lynn to Louise next time we see each other and confirm if they have met at an evening outdoor function. And you're absolutely right, what's a party without some dancing? It's been a pleasure meeting you, Micah, and who knows, maybe we'll realize we have more mutual friends in the future!\"\n\nTurn #12: Micah Stevens said: \"It was a pleasure to meet you too, Jaxon! Yes, who knows, the world is smaller than we think. We'll certainly bump into each other again and maybe even at a gathering with some of our mutual friends. All the best, and enjoy the rest of the party!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Absolutely, Micah! It would be great to bump into each other again and especially with some of our mutual friends. Enjoy the rest of the party and take care!'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Jaxon Prentice, your task is to act/speak as Jaxon Prentice would, keeping in mind Jaxon Prentice's social goal.\nYou can find Jaxon Prentice's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Jaxon Prentice's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Jaxon Prentice's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Micah Stevens and Jaxon Prentice\nMicah Stevens's background: \nJaxon Prentice's background: Jaxon Prentice is a 40-year-old male investigative journalist. He/him pronouns. Jaxon Prentice, an investigative journalist, is known for his brisk jogging sessions early in the morning and his active participation in community functions. Personality and values description: Jaxon Prentice, outgoing yet erratic, emphasizes achievement, power, and security. His decisions swing between quick adaptations to situations and careful planning. Jaxon's secrets: Fabricated evidence to incriminate a corrupt politician\nMicah Stevens's goal: Unknown\nJaxon Prentice's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMarie: Hobby: Acting Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nHarvey: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: Sony Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nFrank: Hobby: Deltiology Company: Ebonite International Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nVera: Hobby: Watching movies Company: Gentiva Health Services Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nLawrence: Hobby: Kayaking Company: Ebonite International Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nLouise: Hobby: Dancing Company: Cray Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nDallas: Hobby: Dancing Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nNancy: Hobby: Dancing Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nBlake: Hobby: Dancing Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Micah Stevens said: \"Hey there! My name's Micah. That's quite a shindig, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Nice to meet you, Micah! I'm Jaxon. Yeah, what a great party, isn't it? By the way, you look like the person who enjoys being active. Do you like any kind of sport or hobby?\"\n\nTurn #2: Micah Stevens said: \"I actually love brewing beer at home, it's like my own little science experiment. Know anyone who's into that too?\"\n\nTurn #3: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Brewing beer at home, huh? That's something special! I can see how it would be like a science experiment. Though none of my friends are into home brewing, my friend Harvey's quite into amateur radio. It's sort of a different science experiment, I guess. I reckon brew masters and amateur radio hobbyists might share the same level of patience and attention to detail? Do you know any amateur radio enthusiasts like Harvey?\"\n\nTurn #4: Micah Stevens said: \"Oh, speaking of amateur radios, I'm indeed acquainted with a couple of folks who share that interest. One of them is Dennis. He works at The J.M. Smucker Company, prefers to operate in the morning, usually outdoors. The other one is Harvey, who actually works at Sony and operates mostly in the afternoons, indoors. Seems like each has their own approach, yet they all share the same excitement for it. What about your friend Harvey, does he have any particular preferences when it comes to his hobby?\"\n\nTurn #5: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Yes, indeed! Harvey prefers his amateur radio sessions in the afternoon, usually indoor. Sounds like he and your friend Harvey have similar habits. And your mention of Dennis in The J.M. Smucker Company reminds me of a friend I know, Blake, who's crazy about dancing and also works at the J.M. Smucker Company. Do you happen to know him?\"\n\nTurn #6: Micah Stevens said: \"Actually, there's another friend of mine at The J.M. Smucker Company who's into a unique hobby - Ninfa enjoys quilting, loves doing it in the morning, and preferably outdoors. Sounds kind of relaxing, doesn't it? But I can't say I know a Blake over there. Is he into any other hobbies aside from dancing? I find the various interests of my friends always present fascinating conversational pieces.\"\n\nTurn #7: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Quilting does sound rather soothing, I must say! As for Blake, aside from his love for dancing, he's a regular gym-goer. I think it complements his love for physical expression. Interesting how diverse hobbies can be, right? Remember how you mentioned Dennis from The J.M. Smucker Company? I wonder if he might have crossed paths with my friend Blake. They could have had some intriguing conversations about their passion for hobbies.\"\n\nTurn #8: Micah Stevens said: \"That's indeed a distinct contrast in hobbies, Blake seems like an interesting person. Speaking of diversity, I also have a friend Jane who values her pastimes greatly. She's into the art of homebrewing and works at Planet Hollywood. She often brews in the morning, outdoors. Dancing and brewing, believe it or not, I think they might find some common ground in their dedication to their hobbies. Maybe they've already run into each other at a hobby event or something.\"\n\nTurn #9: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Ah, brewing and dancing, that's certainly a mix of skill and finesse required there. I haven't met too many brewers, but dancers, I know a few. Jane's brewing hobby makes me think of a friend, Louise. She's passionate about dancing and works at Cray. She usually does her dancing practice outdoors, just like Jane, your homebrewing friend, but in the evenings rather than mornings. Maybe they've met at an outdoor function. Do you know a Louise from Cray by any chance?\"\n\nTurn #10: Micah Stevens said: \"You know, it's a small world, we might very well have mutual friends. Speaking of Cray, it turns out I have a friend, Lynn, who works there and loves homebrewing like Jane. She usually practices her brewing skills outdoors, but unlike your friend hers is in the evenings. Given their similar settings and mutual appreciation for crafting something with their hands, there's a good chance Lynn and Louise might have crossed paths at some point. And of course, if she's friends with Blake too, all the better! After all, what's a party without a bit of dancing?\"\n\nTurn #11: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Indeed, it is a small world, Micah! The name Lynn does ring a bell, especially as you mentioned she's from Cray and loves homebrewing. I'll have to mention Lynn to Louise next time we see each other and confirm if they have met at an evening outdoor function. And you're absolutely right, what's a party without some dancing? It's been a pleasure meeting you, Micah, and who knows, maybe we'll realize we have more mutual friends in the future!\"\n\nTurn #12: Micah Stevens said: \"It was a pleasure to meet you too, Jaxon! Yes, who knows, the world is smaller than we think. We'll certainly bump into each other again and maybe even at a gathering with some of our mutual friends. All the best, and enjoy the rest of the party!\"\n\nTurn #13: Jaxon Prentice said: \"Absolutely, Micah! It would be great to bump into each other again and especially with some of our mutual friends. Enjoy the rest of the party and take care!\"\n\nTurn #14: Micah Stevens left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Rafael Cortez, your task is to act/speak as Rafael Cortez would, keeping in mind Rafael Cortez's social goal.\nYou can find Rafael Cortez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Rafael Cortez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Rafael Cortez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. Personality and values description: Rafael Cortez, with his outgoing nature and competitive spirit, believes in self-direction. He employs a systematic approach to his decisions. Rafael's secrets: He cheated on his medical school exams.\nOliver Thompson's background: \nRafael Cortez's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nElizabeth: School: Eastern Nazarene College Time Preference: morning Major: Social Science Education Location Preference: outdoor \nEric: School: San Jose State University Time Preference: evening Major: Geological Engineering Location Preference: outdoor \nLeroy: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nThanh: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nMarva: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Bioengineering Location Preference: outdoor \nMichael: School: Williams College Time Preference: morning Major: Marine Biology Location Preference: outdoor \nVirginia: School: Williams College Time Preference: evening Major: Applied Mathematics Location Preference: outdoor \nDebra: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Psychology Location Preference: outdoor \nEugenia: School: Stephens College Time Preference: morning Major: Psychology Location Preference: outdoor \nRoberto: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: morning Major: Electrical Technology Location Preference: outdoor \nMark: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: morning Major: Sports, Recreation, & Leisure Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nGeorgene: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: evening Major: Bioengineering Location Preference: outdoor \n\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Good evening! I'm Rafael, a surgeon by profession. At my leisure time, I enjoy chess and visiting historical landmarks. It's quite a pleasure to meet you.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Rafael Cortez, your task is to act/speak as Rafael Cortez would, keeping in mind Rafael Cortez's social goal.\nYou can find Rafael Cortez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Rafael Cortez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Rafael Cortez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. Personality and values description: Rafael Cortez, with his outgoing nature and competitive spirit, believes in self-direction. He employs a systematic approach to his decisions. Rafael's secrets: He cheated on his medical school exams.\nOliver Thompson's background: \nRafael Cortez's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nElizabeth: School: Eastern Nazarene College Time Preference: morning Major: Social Science Education Location Preference: outdoor \nEric: School: San Jose State University Time Preference: evening Major: Geological Engineering Location Preference: outdoor \nLeroy: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nThanh: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nMarva: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Bioengineering Location Preference: outdoor \nMichael: School: Williams College Time Preference: morning Major: Marine Biology Location Preference: outdoor \nVirginia: School: Williams College Time Preference: evening Major: Applied Mathematics Location Preference: outdoor \nDebra: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Psychology Location Preference: outdoor \nEugenia: School: Stephens College Time Preference: morning Major: Psychology Location Preference: outdoor \nRoberto: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: morning Major: Electrical Technology Location Preference: outdoor \nMark: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: morning Major: Sports, Recreation, & Leisure Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nGeorgene: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: evening Major: Bioengineering Location Preference: outdoor \n\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening! I'm Rafael, a surgeon by profession. At my leisure time, I enjoy chess and visiting historical landmarks. It's quite a pleasure to meet you.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Good evening, Rafael! I'm Oliver Thompson, an architect. I admire your profession; it requires immense precision, similar to mine. In my free time, I enjoy painting. Do you have any involvement in the arts or perhaps know someone who does? Maybe someone from Trenton State College or Williams College.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Nice to meet you, Oliver. Our professions certainly share a kind of special symmetry. As for the arts, I take pleasure in acquiring fascinating pieces of medical memorabilia. Speaking of Trenton State College and Williams College, it seems to ring a bell. I have a few friends from these institutions including Leroy from Trenton majoring in Greek, also from Williams, Debra and Marva pursued Psychology and Bioengineering respectively. Incidentally, do you have any acquaintances from these institutions?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Rafael Cortez, your task is to act/speak as Rafael Cortez would, keeping in mind Rafael Cortez's social goal.\nYou can find Rafael Cortez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Rafael Cortez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Rafael Cortez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. Personality and values description: Rafael Cortez, with his outgoing nature and competitive spirit, believes in self-direction. He employs a systematic approach to his decisions. Rafael's secrets: He cheated on his medical school exams.\nOliver Thompson's background: \nRafael Cortez's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nElizabeth: School: Eastern Nazarene College Time Preference: morning Major: Social Science Education Location Preference: outdoor \nEric: School: San Jose State University Time Preference: evening Major: Geological Engineering Location Preference: outdoor \nLeroy: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nThanh: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nMarva: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Bioengineering Location Preference: outdoor \nMichael: School: Williams College Time Preference: morning Major: Marine Biology Location Preference: outdoor \nVirginia: School: Williams College Time Preference: evening Major: Applied Mathematics Location Preference: outdoor \nDebra: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Psychology Location Preference: outdoor \nEugenia: School: Stephens College Time Preference: morning Major: Psychology Location Preference: outdoor \nRoberto: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: morning Major: Electrical Technology Location Preference: outdoor \nMark: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: morning Major: Sports, Recreation, & Leisure Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nGeorgene: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: evening Major: Bioengineering Location Preference: outdoor \n\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening! I'm Rafael, a surgeon by profession. At my leisure time, I enjoy chess and visiting historical landmarks. It's quite a pleasure to meet you.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Good evening, Rafael! I'm Oliver Thompson, an architect. I admire your profession; it requires immense precision, similar to mine. In my free time, I enjoy painting. Do you have any involvement in the arts or perhaps know someone who does? Maybe someone from Trenton State College or Williams College.\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Nice to meet you, Oliver. Our professions certainly share a kind of special symmetry. As for the arts, I take pleasure in acquiring fascinating pieces of medical memorabilia. Speaking of Trenton State College and Williams College, it seems to ring a bell. I have a few friends from these institutions including Leroy from Trenton majoring in Greek, also from Williams, Debra and Marva pursued Psychology and Bioengineering respectively. Incidentally, do you have any acquaintances from these institutions?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"Interesting to know, Rafael. I do have several friends from both Trenton State and Williams College. Did you ever cross paths with a Greek major named Thanh or perhaps a Vocational Education major named Vance from Williams College? They were pretty outgoing people who enjoyed spending their afternoons outdoors. Also, there was Janet from Trenton State, a Greek major too, but she loved spending her mornings indoors.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ah yes, I do remember Thanh! Thanhs' passion for Greek was quite admirable. And oh, Thanh did love the afternoons outdoors, quite a vivid memory. Unfortunately, I don't recall Vance or Janet, but it's interesting to note our overlapping circles. Out of curiosity, are you familiar with a certain Eric from San Jose State University or maybe Roberto and Mark from University of Arkansas? They loved a good game of chess as much as I did.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Rafael Cortez, your task is to act/speak as Rafael Cortez would, keeping in mind Rafael Cortez's social goal.\nYou can find Rafael Cortez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Rafael Cortez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Rafael Cortez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. Personality and values description: Rafael Cortez, with his outgoing nature and competitive spirit, believes in self-direction. He employs a systematic approach to his decisions. Rafael's secrets: He cheated on his medical school exams.\nOliver Thompson's background: \nRafael Cortez's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nElizabeth: School: Eastern Nazarene College Time Preference: morning Major: Social Science Education Location Preference: outdoor \nEric: School: San Jose State University Time Preference: evening Major: Geological Engineering Location Preference: outdoor \nLeroy: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nThanh: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nMarva: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Bioengineering Location Preference: outdoor \nMichael: School: Williams College Time Preference: morning Major: Marine Biology Location Preference: outdoor \nVirginia: School: Williams College Time Preference: evening Major: Applied Mathematics Location Preference: outdoor \nDebra: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Psychology Location Preference: outdoor \nEugenia: School: Stephens College Time Preference: morning Major: Psychology Location Preference: outdoor \nRoberto: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: morning Major: Electrical Technology Location Preference: outdoor \nMark: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: morning Major: Sports, Recreation, & Leisure Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nGeorgene: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: evening Major: Bioengineering Location Preference: outdoor \n\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening! I'm Rafael, a surgeon by profession. At my leisure time, I enjoy chess and visiting historical landmarks. It's quite a pleasure to meet you.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Good evening, Rafael! I'm Oliver Thompson, an architect. I admire your profession; it requires immense precision, similar to mine. In my free time, I enjoy painting. Do you have any involvement in the arts or perhaps know someone who does? Maybe someone from Trenton State College or Williams College.\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Nice to meet you, Oliver. Our professions certainly share a kind of special symmetry. As for the arts, I take pleasure in acquiring fascinating pieces of medical memorabilia. Speaking of Trenton State College and Williams College, it seems to ring a bell. I have a few friends from these institutions including Leroy from Trenton majoring in Greek, also from Williams, Debra and Marva pursued Psychology and Bioengineering respectively. Incidentally, do you have any acquaintances from these institutions?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"Interesting to know, Rafael. I do have several friends from both Trenton State and Williams College. Did you ever cross paths with a Greek major named Thanh or perhaps a Vocational Education major named Vance from Williams College? They were pretty outgoing people who enjoyed spending their afternoons outdoors. Also, there was Janet from Trenton State, a Greek major too, but she loved spending her mornings indoors.\"\n\nTurn #4: Rafael Cortez said: \"Ah yes, I do remember Thanh! Thanhs' passion for Greek was quite admirable. And oh, Thanh did love the afternoons outdoors, quite a vivid memory. Unfortunately, I don't recall Vance or Janet, but it's interesting to note our overlapping circles. Out of curiosity, are you familiar with a certain Eric from San Jose State University or maybe Roberto and Mark from University of Arkansas? They loved a good game of chess as much as I did.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's great you know Thanh! It really is interesting how the world feels so small sometimes. Unfortunately, Eric, Roberto, and Mark from the University of Arkansas don't ring a bell. However, if you're into chess, I wonder if you know Thomas from Williams College. He's an Asian Languages major but also quite the chess enthusiast; seems to match that preference of yours perfectly.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, it's fascinating to realize how interconnected our lives can be. I'm afraid I don't know Thomas from Williams College, but he definitely seems like someone I'd enjoy meeting. Speaking of Williams College, have you perhaps met Virginia or Michael? They also studied there; Virginia in Applied Mathematics and Michael in Marine Biology. Both enjoyed their evenings outdoors and were quite active in various campus activities.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Rafael Cortez, your task is to act/speak as Rafael Cortez would, keeping in mind Rafael Cortez's social goal.\nYou can find Rafael Cortez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Rafael Cortez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Rafael Cortez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. Personality and values description: Rafael Cortez, with his outgoing nature and competitive spirit, believes in self-direction. He employs a systematic approach to his decisions. Rafael's secrets: He cheated on his medical school exams.\nOliver Thompson's background: \nRafael Cortez's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nElizabeth: School: Eastern Nazarene College Time Preference: morning Major: Social Science Education Location Preference: outdoor \nEric: School: San Jose State University Time Preference: evening Major: Geological Engineering Location Preference: outdoor \nLeroy: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nThanh: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nMarva: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Bioengineering Location Preference: outdoor \nMichael: School: Williams College Time Preference: morning Major: Marine Biology Location Preference: outdoor \nVirginia: School: Williams College Time Preference: evening Major: Applied Mathematics Location Preference: outdoor \nDebra: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Psychology Location Preference: outdoor \nEugenia: School: Stephens College Time Preference: morning Major: Psychology Location Preference: outdoor \nRoberto: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: morning Major: Electrical Technology Location Preference: outdoor \nMark: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: morning Major: Sports, Recreation, & Leisure Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nGeorgene: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: evening Major: Bioengineering Location Preference: outdoor \n\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening! I'm Rafael, a surgeon by profession. At my leisure time, I enjoy chess and visiting historical landmarks. It's quite a pleasure to meet you.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Good evening, Rafael! I'm Oliver Thompson, an architect. I admire your profession; it requires immense precision, similar to mine. In my free time, I enjoy painting. Do you have any involvement in the arts or perhaps know someone who does? Maybe someone from Trenton State College or Williams College.\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Nice to meet you, Oliver. Our professions certainly share a kind of special symmetry. As for the arts, I take pleasure in acquiring fascinating pieces of medical memorabilia. Speaking of Trenton State College and Williams College, it seems to ring a bell. I have a few friends from these institutions including Leroy from Trenton majoring in Greek, also from Williams, Debra and Marva pursued Psychology and Bioengineering respectively. Incidentally, do you have any acquaintances from these institutions?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"Interesting to know, Rafael. I do have several friends from both Trenton State and Williams College. Did you ever cross paths with a Greek major named Thanh or perhaps a Vocational Education major named Vance from Williams College? They were pretty outgoing people who enjoyed spending their afternoons outdoors. Also, there was Janet from Trenton State, a Greek major too, but she loved spending her mornings indoors.\"\n\nTurn #4: Rafael Cortez said: \"Ah yes, I do remember Thanh! Thanhs' passion for Greek was quite admirable. And oh, Thanh did love the afternoons outdoors, quite a vivid memory. Unfortunately, I don't recall Vance or Janet, but it's interesting to note our overlapping circles. Out of curiosity, are you familiar with a certain Eric from San Jose State University or maybe Roberto and Mark from University of Arkansas? They loved a good game of chess as much as I did.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's great you know Thanh! It really is interesting how the world feels so small sometimes. Unfortunately, Eric, Roberto, and Mark from the University of Arkansas don't ring a bell. However, if you're into chess, I wonder if you know Thomas from Williams College. He's an Asian Languages major but also quite the chess enthusiast; seems to match that preference of yours perfectly.\"\n\nTurn #6: Rafael Cortez said: \"Indeed, it's fascinating to realize how interconnected our lives can be. I'm afraid I don't know Thomas from Williams College, but he definitely seems like someone I'd enjoy meeting. Speaking of Williams College, have you perhaps met Virginia or Michael? They also studied there; Virginia in Applied Mathematics and Michael in Marine Biology. Both enjoyed their evenings outdoors and were quite active in various campus activities.\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"I'm afraid I don't recognize Virginia or Michael from Williams College- but, they certainly sound like the type of individuals I'd run into. On the topic of outdoor evening activities, I know a Brenda from Trenton State College who studied Conflict Resolution Studies and loved her evenings outdoors too. Have you ever crossed paths with her?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I don't recall meeting a Brenda from Trenton State College, although she does seem like someone I'd cross paths with given our shared preference for the outdoors. As we've discussed our mutual connections, I can't help but recall Georgene from University of Arkansas, a Bioengineering major who also enjoyed her evenings outside. I wonder if she might be part of your social circle as well. It truly is a small world sometimes.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Rafael Cortez, your task is to act/speak as Rafael Cortez would, keeping in mind Rafael Cortez's social goal.\nYou can find Rafael Cortez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Rafael Cortez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Rafael Cortez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. Personality and values description: Rafael Cortez, with his outgoing nature and competitive spirit, believes in self-direction. He employs a systematic approach to his decisions. Rafael's secrets: He cheated on his medical school exams.\nOliver Thompson's background: \nRafael Cortez's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nElizabeth: School: Eastern Nazarene College Time Preference: morning Major: Social Science Education Location Preference: outdoor \nEric: School: San Jose State University Time Preference: evening Major: Geological Engineering Location Preference: outdoor \nLeroy: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nThanh: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nMarva: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Bioengineering Location Preference: outdoor \nMichael: School: Williams College Time Preference: morning Major: Marine Biology Location Preference: outdoor \nVirginia: School: Williams College Time Preference: evening Major: Applied Mathematics Location Preference: outdoor \nDebra: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Psychology Location Preference: outdoor \nEugenia: School: Stephens College Time Preference: morning Major: Psychology Location Preference: outdoor \nRoberto: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: morning Major: Electrical Technology Location Preference: outdoor \nMark: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: morning Major: Sports, Recreation, & Leisure Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nGeorgene: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: evening Major: Bioengineering Location Preference: outdoor \n\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening! I'm Rafael, a surgeon by profession. At my leisure time, I enjoy chess and visiting historical landmarks. It's quite a pleasure to meet you.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Good evening, Rafael! I'm Oliver Thompson, an architect. I admire your profession; it requires immense precision, similar to mine. In my free time, I enjoy painting. Do you have any involvement in the arts or perhaps know someone who does? Maybe someone from Trenton State College or Williams College.\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Nice to meet you, Oliver. Our professions certainly share a kind of special symmetry. As for the arts, I take pleasure in acquiring fascinating pieces of medical memorabilia. Speaking of Trenton State College and Williams College, it seems to ring a bell. I have a few friends from these institutions including Leroy from Trenton majoring in Greek, also from Williams, Debra and Marva pursued Psychology and Bioengineering respectively. Incidentally, do you have any acquaintances from these institutions?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"Interesting to know, Rafael. I do have several friends from both Trenton State and Williams College. Did you ever cross paths with a Greek major named Thanh or perhaps a Vocational Education major named Vance from Williams College? They were pretty outgoing people who enjoyed spending their afternoons outdoors. Also, there was Janet from Trenton State, a Greek major too, but she loved spending her mornings indoors.\"\n\nTurn #4: Rafael Cortez said: \"Ah yes, I do remember Thanh! Thanhs' passion for Greek was quite admirable. And oh, Thanh did love the afternoons outdoors, quite a vivid memory. Unfortunately, I don't recall Vance or Janet, but it's interesting to note our overlapping circles. Out of curiosity, are you familiar with a certain Eric from San Jose State University or maybe Roberto and Mark from University of Arkansas? They loved a good game of chess as much as I did.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's great you know Thanh! It really is interesting how the world feels so small sometimes. Unfortunately, Eric, Roberto, and Mark from the University of Arkansas don't ring a bell. However, if you're into chess, I wonder if you know Thomas from Williams College. He's an Asian Languages major but also quite the chess enthusiast; seems to match that preference of yours perfectly.\"\n\nTurn #6: Rafael Cortez said: \"Indeed, it's fascinating to realize how interconnected our lives can be. I'm afraid I don't know Thomas from Williams College, but he definitely seems like someone I'd enjoy meeting. Speaking of Williams College, have you perhaps met Virginia or Michael? They also studied there; Virginia in Applied Mathematics and Michael in Marine Biology. Both enjoyed their evenings outdoors and were quite active in various campus activities.\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"I'm afraid I don't recognize Virginia or Michael from Williams College- but, they certainly sound like the type of individuals I'd run into. On the topic of outdoor evening activities, I know a Brenda from Trenton State College who studied Conflict Resolution Studies and loved her evenings outdoors too. Have you ever crossed paths with her?\"\n\nTurn #8: Rafael Cortez said: \"I don't recall meeting a Brenda from Trenton State College, although she does seem like someone I'd cross paths with given our shared preference for the outdoors. As we've discussed our mutual connections, I can't help but recall Georgene from University of Arkansas, a Bioengineering major who also enjoyed her evenings outside. I wonder if she might be part of your social circle as well. It truly is a small world sometimes.\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Thompson said: \"Georgene from the University of Arkansas doesn't fit into my social circle, I'm afraid. I cannot deny, however, that it surely is a small world. There are a few other friends I have from different fields and universities, it is possible we might find more connections. But as of now, it's remarkable how we discovered some mutual acquaintances given the scope of our networks. It's been fascinating conversing with you, Rafael.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Rafael Cortez, your task is to act/speak as Rafael Cortez would, keeping in mind Rafael Cortez's social goal.\nYou can find Rafael Cortez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Rafael Cortez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Rafael Cortez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. Personality and values description: Rafael Cortez, with his outgoing nature and competitive spirit, believes in self-direction. He employs a systematic approach to his decisions. Rafael's secrets: He cheated on his medical school exams.\nOliver Thompson's background: \nRafael Cortez's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nElizabeth: School: Eastern Nazarene College Time Preference: morning Major: Social Science Education Location Preference: outdoor \nEric: School: San Jose State University Time Preference: evening Major: Geological Engineering Location Preference: outdoor \nLeroy: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nThanh: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nMarva: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Bioengineering Location Preference: outdoor \nMichael: School: Williams College Time Preference: morning Major: Marine Biology Location Preference: outdoor \nVirginia: School: Williams College Time Preference: evening Major: Applied Mathematics Location Preference: outdoor \nDebra: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Psychology Location Preference: outdoor \nEugenia: School: Stephens College Time Preference: morning Major: Psychology Location Preference: outdoor \nRoberto: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: morning Major: Electrical Technology Location Preference: outdoor \nMark: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: morning Major: Sports, Recreation, & Leisure Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nGeorgene: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: evening Major: Bioengineering Location Preference: outdoor \n\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening! I'm Rafael, a surgeon by profession. At my leisure time, I enjoy chess and visiting historical landmarks. It's quite a pleasure to meet you.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Good evening, Rafael! I'm Oliver Thompson, an architect. I admire your profession; it requires immense precision, similar to mine. In my free time, I enjoy painting. Do you have any involvement in the arts or perhaps know someone who does? Maybe someone from Trenton State College or Williams College.\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Nice to meet you, Oliver. Our professions certainly share a kind of special symmetry. As for the arts, I take pleasure in acquiring fascinating pieces of medical memorabilia. Speaking of Trenton State College and Williams College, it seems to ring a bell. I have a few friends from these institutions including Leroy from Trenton majoring in Greek, also from Williams, Debra and Marva pursued Psychology and Bioengineering respectively. Incidentally, do you have any acquaintances from these institutions?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"Interesting to know, Rafael. I do have several friends from both Trenton State and Williams College. Did you ever cross paths with a Greek major named Thanh or perhaps a Vocational Education major named Vance from Williams College? They were pretty outgoing people who enjoyed spending their afternoons outdoors. Also, there was Janet from Trenton State, a Greek major too, but she loved spending her mornings indoors.\"\n\nTurn #4: Rafael Cortez said: \"Ah yes, I do remember Thanh! Thanhs' passion for Greek was quite admirable. And oh, Thanh did love the afternoons outdoors, quite a vivid memory. Unfortunately, I don't recall Vance or Janet, but it's interesting to note our overlapping circles. Out of curiosity, are you familiar with a certain Eric from San Jose State University or maybe Roberto and Mark from University of Arkansas? They loved a good game of chess as much as I did.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's great you know Thanh! It really is interesting how the world feels so small sometimes. Unfortunately, Eric, Roberto, and Mark from the University of Arkansas don't ring a bell. However, if you're into chess, I wonder if you know Thomas from Williams College. He's an Asian Languages major but also quite the chess enthusiast; seems to match that preference of yours perfectly.\"\n\nTurn #6: Rafael Cortez said: \"Indeed, it's fascinating to realize how interconnected our lives can be. I'm afraid I don't know Thomas from Williams College, but he definitely seems like someone I'd enjoy meeting. Speaking of Williams College, have you perhaps met Virginia or Michael? They also studied there; Virginia in Applied Mathematics and Michael in Marine Biology. Both enjoyed their evenings outdoors and were quite active in various campus activities.\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"I'm afraid I don't recognize Virginia or Michael from Williams College- but, they certainly sound like the type of individuals I'd run into. On the topic of outdoor evening activities, I know a Brenda from Trenton State College who studied Conflict Resolution Studies and loved her evenings outdoors too. Have you ever crossed paths with her?\"\n\nTurn #8: Rafael Cortez said: \"I don't recall meeting a Brenda from Trenton State College, although she does seem like someone I'd cross paths with given our shared preference for the outdoors. As we've discussed our mutual connections, I can't help but recall Georgene from University of Arkansas, a Bioengineering major who also enjoyed her evenings outside. I wonder if she might be part of your social circle as well. It truly is a small world sometimes.\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Thompson said: \"Georgene from the University of Arkansas doesn't fit into my social circle, I'm afraid. I cannot deny, however, that it surely is a small world. There are a few other friends I have from different fields and universities, it is possible we might find more connections. But as of now, it's remarkable how we discovered some mutual acquaintances given the scope of our networks. It's been fascinating conversing with you, Rafael.\"\n\nTurn #10: \n\nTurn #11: Oliver Thompson left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nRafael Cortez's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nThanh: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nVance: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Vocational Education Location Preference: outdoor \nBrenda: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: evening Major: Conflict Resolution Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nAlice: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Crafts & Artisanry Location Preference: indoor \nThomas: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Asian Languages Location Preference: indoor \nJanet: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Greek Location Preference: indoor \nRobert: School: Rutgers University, Newark Time Preference: morning Major: Protestant Affiliation Location Preference: indoor \nAnthony: School: Oberlin College Time Preference: morning Major: Conflict Resolution Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nElvera: School: Muskingum College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Crafts & Artisanry Location Preference: outdoor \nJames: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Materials Engineering Location Preference: outdoor \nEdgar: School: Muskingum College Time Preference: morning Major: Conflict Resolution Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nKristen: School: Oberlin College Time Preference: evening Major: Electrical Technology Location Preference: indoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening! I'm Rafael, a surgeon by profession. At my leisure time, I enjoy chess and visiting historical landmarks. It's quite a pleasure to meet you.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Good evening, Rafael! I'm Oliver Thompson, an architect. I admire your profession; it requires immense precision, similar to mine. In my free time, I enjoy painting. Do you have any involvement in the arts or perhaps know someone who does? Maybe someone from Trenton State College or Williams College.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nRafael Cortez's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nThanh: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nVance: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Vocational Education Location Preference: outdoor \nBrenda: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: evening Major: Conflict Resolution Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nAlice: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Crafts & Artisanry Location Preference: indoor \nThomas: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Asian Languages Location Preference: indoor \nJanet: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Greek Location Preference: indoor \nRobert: School: Rutgers University, Newark Time Preference: morning Major: Protestant Affiliation Location Preference: indoor \nAnthony: School: Oberlin College Time Preference: morning Major: Conflict Resolution Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nElvera: School: Muskingum College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Crafts & Artisanry Location Preference: outdoor \nJames: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Materials Engineering Location Preference: outdoor \nEdgar: School: Muskingum College Time Preference: morning Major: Conflict Resolution Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nKristen: School: Oberlin College Time Preference: evening Major: Electrical Technology Location Preference: indoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening! I'm Rafael, a surgeon by profession. At my leisure time, I enjoy chess and visiting historical landmarks. It's quite a pleasure to meet you.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Good evening, Rafael! I'm Oliver Thompson, an architect. I admire your profession; it requires immense precision, similar to mine. In my free time, I enjoy painting. Do you have any involvement in the arts or perhaps know someone who does? Maybe someone from Trenton State College or Williams College.\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Nice to meet you, Oliver. Our professions certainly share a kind of special symmetry. As for the arts, I take pleasure in acquiring fascinating pieces of medical memorabilia. Speaking of Trenton State College and Williams College, it seems to ring a bell. I have a few friends from these institutions including Leroy from Trenton majoring in Greek, also from Williams, Debra and Marva pursued Psychology and Bioengineering respectively. Incidentally, do you have any acquaintances from these institutions?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Interesting to know, Rafael. I do have several friends from both Trenton State and Williams College. Did you ever cross paths with a Greek major named Thanh or perhaps a Vocational Education major named Vance from Williams College? They were pretty outgoing people who enjoyed spending their afternoons outdoors. Also, there was Janet from Trenton State, a Greek major too, but she loved spending her mornings indoors.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nRafael Cortez's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nThanh: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nVance: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Vocational Education Location Preference: outdoor \nBrenda: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: evening Major: Conflict Resolution Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nAlice: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Crafts & Artisanry Location Preference: indoor \nThomas: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Asian Languages Location Preference: indoor \nJanet: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Greek Location Preference: indoor \nRobert: School: Rutgers University, Newark Time Preference: morning Major: Protestant Affiliation Location Preference: indoor \nAnthony: School: Oberlin College Time Preference: morning Major: Conflict Resolution Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nElvera: School: Muskingum College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Crafts & Artisanry Location Preference: outdoor \nJames: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Materials Engineering Location Preference: outdoor \nEdgar: School: Muskingum College Time Preference: morning Major: Conflict Resolution Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nKristen: School: Oberlin College Time Preference: evening Major: Electrical Technology Location Preference: indoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening! I'm Rafael, a surgeon by profession. At my leisure time, I enjoy chess and visiting historical landmarks. It's quite a pleasure to meet you.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Good evening, Rafael! I'm Oliver Thompson, an architect. I admire your profession; it requires immense precision, similar to mine. In my free time, I enjoy painting. Do you have any involvement in the arts or perhaps know someone who does? Maybe someone from Trenton State College or Williams College.\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Nice to meet you, Oliver. Our professions certainly share a kind of special symmetry. As for the arts, I take pleasure in acquiring fascinating pieces of medical memorabilia. Speaking of Trenton State College and Williams College, it seems to ring a bell. I have a few friends from these institutions including Leroy from Trenton majoring in Greek, also from Williams, Debra and Marva pursued Psychology and Bioengineering respectively. Incidentally, do you have any acquaintances from these institutions?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"Interesting to know, Rafael. I do have several friends from both Trenton State and Williams College. Did you ever cross paths with a Greek major named Thanh or perhaps a Vocational Education major named Vance from Williams College? They were pretty outgoing people who enjoyed spending their afternoons outdoors. Also, there was Janet from Trenton State, a Greek major too, but she loved spending her mornings indoors.\"\n\nTurn #4: Rafael Cortez said: \"Ah yes, I do remember Thanh! Thanhs' passion for Greek was quite admirable. And oh, Thanh did love the afternoons outdoors, quite a vivid memory. Unfortunately, I don't recall Vance or Janet, but it's interesting to note our overlapping circles. Out of curiosity, are you familiar with a certain Eric from San Jose State University or maybe Roberto and Mark from University of Arkansas? They loved a good game of chess as much as I did.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's great you know Thanh! It really is interesting how the world feels so small sometimes. Unfortunately, Eric, Roberto, and Mark from the University of Arkansas don't ring a bell. However, if you're into chess, I wonder if you know Thomas from Williams College. He's an Asian Languages major but also quite the chess enthusiast; seems to match that preference of yours perfectly.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nRafael Cortez's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nThanh: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nVance: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Vocational Education Location Preference: outdoor \nBrenda: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: evening Major: Conflict Resolution Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nAlice: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Crafts & Artisanry Location Preference: indoor \nThomas: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Asian Languages Location Preference: indoor \nJanet: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Greek Location Preference: indoor \nRobert: School: Rutgers University, Newark Time Preference: morning Major: Protestant Affiliation Location Preference: indoor \nAnthony: School: Oberlin College Time Preference: morning Major: Conflict Resolution Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nElvera: School: Muskingum College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Crafts & Artisanry Location Preference: outdoor \nJames: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Materials Engineering Location Preference: outdoor \nEdgar: School: Muskingum College Time Preference: morning Major: Conflict Resolution Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nKristen: School: Oberlin College Time Preference: evening Major: Electrical Technology Location Preference: indoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening! I'm Rafael, a surgeon by profession. At my leisure time, I enjoy chess and visiting historical landmarks. It's quite a pleasure to meet you.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Good evening, Rafael! I'm Oliver Thompson, an architect. I admire your profession; it requires immense precision, similar to mine. In my free time, I enjoy painting. Do you have any involvement in the arts or perhaps know someone who does? Maybe someone from Trenton State College or Williams College.\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Nice to meet you, Oliver. Our professions certainly share a kind of special symmetry. As for the arts, I take pleasure in acquiring fascinating pieces of medical memorabilia. Speaking of Trenton State College and Williams College, it seems to ring a bell. I have a few friends from these institutions including Leroy from Trenton majoring in Greek, also from Williams, Debra and Marva pursued Psychology and Bioengineering respectively. Incidentally, do you have any acquaintances from these institutions?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"Interesting to know, Rafael. I do have several friends from both Trenton State and Williams College. Did you ever cross paths with a Greek major named Thanh or perhaps a Vocational Education major named Vance from Williams College? They were pretty outgoing people who enjoyed spending their afternoons outdoors. Also, there was Janet from Trenton State, a Greek major too, but she loved spending her mornings indoors.\"\n\nTurn #4: Rafael Cortez said: \"Ah yes, I do remember Thanh! Thanhs' passion for Greek was quite admirable. And oh, Thanh did love the afternoons outdoors, quite a vivid memory. Unfortunately, I don't recall Vance or Janet, but it's interesting to note our overlapping circles. Out of curiosity, are you familiar with a certain Eric from San Jose State University or maybe Roberto and Mark from University of Arkansas? They loved a good game of chess as much as I did.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's great you know Thanh! It really is interesting how the world feels so small sometimes. Unfortunately, Eric, Roberto, and Mark from the University of Arkansas don't ring a bell. However, if you're into chess, I wonder if you know Thomas from Williams College. He's an Asian Languages major but also quite the chess enthusiast; seems to match that preference of yours perfectly.\"\n\nTurn #6: Rafael Cortez said: \"Indeed, it's fascinating to realize how interconnected our lives can be. I'm afraid I don't know Thomas from Williams College, but he definitely seems like someone I'd enjoy meeting. Speaking of Williams College, have you perhaps met Virginia or Michael? They also studied there; Virginia in Applied Mathematics and Michael in Marine Biology. Both enjoyed their evenings outdoors and were quite active in various campus activities.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm afraid I don't recognize Virginia or Michael from Williams College- but, they certainly sound like the type of individuals I'd run into. On the topic of outdoor evening activities, I know a Brenda from Trenton State College who studied Conflict Resolution Studies and loved her evenings outdoors too. Have you ever crossed paths with her?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nRafael Cortez's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nThanh: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nVance: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Vocational Education Location Preference: outdoor \nBrenda: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: evening Major: Conflict Resolution Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nAlice: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Crafts & Artisanry Location Preference: indoor \nThomas: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Asian Languages Location Preference: indoor \nJanet: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Greek Location Preference: indoor \nRobert: School: Rutgers University, Newark Time Preference: morning Major: Protestant Affiliation Location Preference: indoor \nAnthony: School: Oberlin College Time Preference: morning Major: Conflict Resolution Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nElvera: School: Muskingum College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Crafts & Artisanry Location Preference: outdoor \nJames: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Materials Engineering Location Preference: outdoor \nEdgar: School: Muskingum College Time Preference: morning Major: Conflict Resolution Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nKristen: School: Oberlin College Time Preference: evening Major: Electrical Technology Location Preference: indoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening! I'm Rafael, a surgeon by profession. At my leisure time, I enjoy chess and visiting historical landmarks. It's quite a pleasure to meet you.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Good evening, Rafael! I'm Oliver Thompson, an architect. I admire your profession; it requires immense precision, similar to mine. In my free time, I enjoy painting. Do you have any involvement in the arts or perhaps know someone who does? Maybe someone from Trenton State College or Williams College.\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Nice to meet you, Oliver. Our professions certainly share a kind of special symmetry. As for the arts, I take pleasure in acquiring fascinating pieces of medical memorabilia. Speaking of Trenton State College and Williams College, it seems to ring a bell. I have a few friends from these institutions including Leroy from Trenton majoring in Greek, also from Williams, Debra and Marva pursued Psychology and Bioengineering respectively. Incidentally, do you have any acquaintances from these institutions?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"Interesting to know, Rafael. I do have several friends from both Trenton State and Williams College. Did you ever cross paths with a Greek major named Thanh or perhaps a Vocational Education major named Vance from Williams College? They were pretty outgoing people who enjoyed spending their afternoons outdoors. Also, there was Janet from Trenton State, a Greek major too, but she loved spending her mornings indoors.\"\n\nTurn #4: Rafael Cortez said: \"Ah yes, I do remember Thanh! Thanhs' passion for Greek was quite admirable. And oh, Thanh did love the afternoons outdoors, quite a vivid memory. Unfortunately, I don't recall Vance or Janet, but it's interesting to note our overlapping circles. Out of curiosity, are you familiar with a certain Eric from San Jose State University or maybe Roberto and Mark from University of Arkansas? They loved a good game of chess as much as I did.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's great you know Thanh! It really is interesting how the world feels so small sometimes. Unfortunately, Eric, Roberto, and Mark from the University of Arkansas don't ring a bell. However, if you're into chess, I wonder if you know Thomas from Williams College. He's an Asian Languages major but also quite the chess enthusiast; seems to match that preference of yours perfectly.\"\n\nTurn #6: Rafael Cortez said: \"Indeed, it's fascinating to realize how interconnected our lives can be. I'm afraid I don't know Thomas from Williams College, but he definitely seems like someone I'd enjoy meeting. Speaking of Williams College, have you perhaps met Virginia or Michael? They also studied there; Virginia in Applied Mathematics and Michael in Marine Biology. Both enjoyed their evenings outdoors and were quite active in various campus activities.\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"I'm afraid I don't recognize Virginia or Michael from Williams College- but, they certainly sound like the type of individuals I'd run into. On the topic of outdoor evening activities, I know a Brenda from Trenton State College who studied Conflict Resolution Studies and loved her evenings outdoors too. Have you ever crossed paths with her?\"\n\nTurn #8: Rafael Cortez said: \"I don't recall meeting a Brenda from Trenton State College, although she does seem like someone I'd cross paths with given our shared preference for the outdoors. As we've discussed our mutual connections, I can't help but recall Georgene from University of Arkansas, a Bioengineering major who also enjoyed her evenings outside. I wonder if she might be part of your social circle as well. It truly is a small world sometimes.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Georgene from the University of Arkansas doesn't fit into my social circle, I'm afraid. I cannot deny, however, that it surely is a small world. There are a few other friends I have from different fields and universities, it is possible we might find more connections. But as of now, it's remarkable how we discovered some mutual acquaintances given the scope of our networks. It's been fascinating conversing with you, Rafael.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nRafael Cortez's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nThanh: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nVance: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Vocational Education Location Preference: outdoor \nBrenda: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: evening Major: Conflict Resolution Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nAlice: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Crafts & Artisanry Location Preference: indoor \nThomas: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Asian Languages Location Preference: indoor \nJanet: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Greek Location Preference: indoor \nRobert: School: Rutgers University, Newark Time Preference: morning Major: Protestant Affiliation Location Preference: indoor \nAnthony: School: Oberlin College Time Preference: morning Major: Conflict Resolution Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nElvera: School: Muskingum College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Crafts & Artisanry Location Preference: outdoor \nJames: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Materials Engineering Location Preference: outdoor \nEdgar: School: Muskingum College Time Preference: morning Major: Conflict Resolution Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nKristen: School: Oberlin College Time Preference: evening Major: Electrical Technology Location Preference: indoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening! I'm Rafael, a surgeon by profession. At my leisure time, I enjoy chess and visiting historical landmarks. It's quite a pleasure to meet you.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Good evening, Rafael! I'm Oliver Thompson, an architect. I admire your profession; it requires immense precision, similar to mine. In my free time, I enjoy painting. Do you have any involvement in the arts or perhaps know someone who does? Maybe someone from Trenton State College or Williams College.\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Nice to meet you, Oliver. Our professions certainly share a kind of special symmetry. As for the arts, I take pleasure in acquiring fascinating pieces of medical memorabilia. Speaking of Trenton State College and Williams College, it seems to ring a bell. I have a few friends from these institutions including Leroy from Trenton majoring in Greek, also from Williams, Debra and Marva pursued Psychology and Bioengineering respectively. Incidentally, do you have any acquaintances from these institutions?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"Interesting to know, Rafael. I do have several friends from both Trenton State and Williams College. Did you ever cross paths with a Greek major named Thanh or perhaps a Vocational Education major named Vance from Williams College? They were pretty outgoing people who enjoyed spending their afternoons outdoors. Also, there was Janet from Trenton State, a Greek major too, but she loved spending her mornings indoors.\"\n\nTurn #4: Rafael Cortez said: \"Ah yes, I do remember Thanh! Thanhs' passion for Greek was quite admirable. And oh, Thanh did love the afternoons outdoors, quite a vivid memory. Unfortunately, I don't recall Vance or Janet, but it's interesting to note our overlapping circles. Out of curiosity, are you familiar with a certain Eric from San Jose State University or maybe Roberto and Mark from University of Arkansas? They loved a good game of chess as much as I did.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"That's great you know Thanh! It really is interesting how the world feels so small sometimes. Unfortunately, Eric, Roberto, and Mark from the University of Arkansas don't ring a bell. However, if you're into chess, I wonder if you know Thomas from Williams College. He's an Asian Languages major but also quite the chess enthusiast; seems to match that preference of yours perfectly.\"\n\nTurn #6: Rafael Cortez said: \"Indeed, it's fascinating to realize how interconnected our lives can be. I'm afraid I don't know Thomas from Williams College, but he definitely seems like someone I'd enjoy meeting. Speaking of Williams College, have you perhaps met Virginia or Michael? They also studied there; Virginia in Applied Mathematics and Michael in Marine Biology. Both enjoyed their evenings outdoors and were quite active in various campus activities.\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"I'm afraid I don't recognize Virginia or Michael from Williams College- but, they certainly sound like the type of individuals I'd run into. On the topic of outdoor evening activities, I know a Brenda from Trenton State College who studied Conflict Resolution Studies and loved her evenings outdoors too. Have you ever crossed paths with her?\"\n\nTurn #8: Rafael Cortez said: \"I don't recall meeting a Brenda from Trenton State College, although she does seem like someone I'd cross paths with given our shared preference for the outdoors. As we've discussed our mutual connections, I can't help but recall Georgene from University of Arkansas, a Bioengineering major who also enjoyed her evenings outside. I wonder if she might be part of your social circle as well. It truly is a small world sometimes.\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Thompson said: \"Georgene from the University of Arkansas doesn't fit into my social circle, I'm afraid. I cannot deny, however, that it surely is a small world. There are a few other friends I have from different fields and universities, it is possible we might find more connections. But as of now, it's remarkable how we discovered some mutual acquaintances given the scope of our networks. It's been fascinating conversing with you, Rafael.\"\n\nTurn #10: \n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Antique Chair for $15.0, while another person is interested in purchasing it. Here's what you need to know about the item: it's a beautifully carved antique wooden chair. It's in good condition, but could probably benefit from a fresh seat cushion.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Lena Goodwin\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nLena Goodwin's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are the buyer for this item, and your target price is $9.0. If you purchase it at a significantly higher price, be aware that you will incur a penalty. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hello Lena, it's Lily here. I noticed you have an antique chair up for sale. It's quite lovely. What can you tell me about its history?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Antique Chair for $15.0, while another person is interested in purchasing it. Here's what you need to know about the item: it's a beautifully carved antique wooden chair. It's in good condition, but could probably benefit from a fresh seat cushion.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Lena Goodwin\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nLena Goodwin's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are the buyer for this item, and your target price is $9.0. If you purchase it at a significantly higher price, be aware that you will incur a penalty. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello Lena, it's Lily here. I noticed you have an antique chair up for sale. It's quite lovely. What can you tell me about its history?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hello Lily, it's great to hear from you. This antique chair indeed has a thrilling story. It was originally owned by a local established artist who is known for his exquisite carpentry skills. He crafted this chair in the late 1800s, showcasing his signature detailed carvings. Besides its aesthetic appeal, it has remained in pretty good condition but might need a new seat cushion. I hope this piece could find a new life in your home, enjoying being part of beautiful moments. I've put it out for $15, but I'm open to some negotiation. Let me know what you think.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you for sharing that history, Lena. The chair shows remarkable craftsmanship. Considering it needs a new seat cushion, which is another investment, would you consider letting it go for $9? This would help me take up the necessary refurbishing while also preserving the chair's original essence.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Antique Chair for $15.0, while another person is interested in purchasing it. Here's what you need to know about the item: it's a beautifully carved antique wooden chair. It's in good condition, but could probably benefit from a fresh seat cushion.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Lena Goodwin\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nLena Goodwin's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are the buyer for this item, and your target price is $9.0. If you purchase it at a significantly higher price, be aware that you will incur a penalty. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello Lena, it's Lily here. I noticed you have an antique chair up for sale. It's quite lovely. What can you tell me about its history?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hello Lily, it's great to hear from you. This antique chair indeed has a thrilling story. It was originally owned by a local established artist who is known for his exquisite carpentry skills. He crafted this chair in the late 1800s, showcasing his signature detailed carvings. Besides its aesthetic appeal, it has remained in pretty good condition but might need a new seat cushion. I hope this piece could find a new life in your home, enjoying being part of beautiful moments. I've put it out for $15, but I'm open to some negotiation. Let me know what you think.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Thank you for sharing that history, Lena. The chair shows remarkable craftsmanship. Considering it needs a new seat cushion, which is another investment, would you consider letting it go for $9? This would help me take up the necessary refurbishing while also preserving the chair's original essence.\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"I understand your concerns connected with the additional investment, Lily. I value the fact that you appreciate the essence of the chair and want to preserve it. As a show of good faith, would you consider a settlement at $10, splitting the difference?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You've made a fair proposal, Lena. I'm glad we managed to find some common ground in this negotiation. I accept the $10 offer. It's important to me that this chair keeps adding value to someone's life, just as it did in the past.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Antique Chair for $15.0, while another person is interested in purchasing it. Here's what you need to know about the item: it's a beautifully carved antique wooden chair. It's in good condition, but could probably benefit from a fresh seat cushion.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Lena Goodwin\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nLena Goodwin's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are the buyer for this item, and your target price is $9.0. If you purchase it at a significantly higher price, be aware that you will incur a penalty. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello Lena, it's Lily here. I noticed you have an antique chair up for sale. It's quite lovely. What can you tell me about its history?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hello Lily, it's great to hear from you. This antique chair indeed has a thrilling story. It was originally owned by a local established artist who is known for his exquisite carpentry skills. He crafted this chair in the late 1800s, showcasing his signature detailed carvings. Besides its aesthetic appeal, it has remained in pretty good condition but might need a new seat cushion. I hope this piece could find a new life in your home, enjoying being part of beautiful moments. I've put it out for $15, but I'm open to some negotiation. Let me know what you think.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Thank you for sharing that history, Lena. The chair shows remarkable craftsmanship. Considering it needs a new seat cushion, which is another investment, would you consider letting it go for $9? This would help me take up the necessary refurbishing while also preserving the chair's original essence.\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"I understand your concerns connected with the additional investment, Lily. I value the fact that you appreciate the essence of the chair and want to preserve it. As a show of good faith, would you consider a settlement at $10, splitting the difference?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"You've made a fair proposal, Lena. I'm glad we managed to find some common ground in this negotiation. I accept the $10 offer. It's important to me that this chair keeps adding value to someone's life, just as it did in the past.\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"Fantastic, Lily. It's a joy to know that the chair will continue its history with someone who values its craftsmanship and story. Shall we proceed to discuss the logistics of payment and delivery?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Lena. Let's move on to the payment and delivery details. I'm grateful we could reach an agreement that respects the value of the chair.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Antique Chair for $15.0, while another person is interested in purchasing it. Here's what you need to know about the item: it's a beautifully carved antique wooden chair. It's in good condition, but could probably benefit from a fresh seat cushion.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Lena Goodwin\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nLena Goodwin's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are the buyer for this item, and your target price is $9.0. If you purchase it at a significantly higher price, be aware that you will incur a penalty. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello Lena, it's Lily here. I noticed you have an antique chair up for sale. It's quite lovely. What can you tell me about its history?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hello Lily, it's great to hear from you. This antique chair indeed has a thrilling story. It was originally owned by a local established artist who is known for his exquisite carpentry skills. He crafted this chair in the late 1800s, showcasing his signature detailed carvings. Besides its aesthetic appeal, it has remained in pretty good condition but might need a new seat cushion. I hope this piece could find a new life in your home, enjoying being part of beautiful moments. I've put it out for $15, but I'm open to some negotiation. Let me know what you think.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Thank you for sharing that history, Lena. The chair shows remarkable craftsmanship. Considering it needs a new seat cushion, which is another investment, would you consider letting it go for $9? This would help me take up the necessary refurbishing while also preserving the chair's original essence.\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"I understand your concerns connected with the additional investment, Lily. I value the fact that you appreciate the essence of the chair and want to preserve it. As a show of good faith, would you consider a settlement at $10, splitting the difference?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"You've made a fair proposal, Lena. I'm glad we managed to find some common ground in this negotiation. I accept the $10 offer. It's important to me that this chair keeps adding value to someone's life, just as it did in the past.\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"Fantastic, Lily. It's a joy to know that the chair will continue its history with someone who values its craftsmanship and story. Shall we proceed to discuss the logistics of payment and delivery?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Absolutely, Lena. Let's move on to the payment and delivery details. I'm grateful we could reach an agreement that respects the value of the chair.\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"I'm glad too, Lily. To make things easier regarding payment, I'll send you an invoice through email. As for delivery, I offer porch pickup from my residence. If that doesn't work for you, we can discuss other options. How does that sound?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds perfectly reasonable, Lena. An invoice through email works great and I'm more than happy to pick up the chair from your porch. I'll look forward to your email and we can coordinate the pickup. Thank you for this smooth transaction.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Antique Chair for $15.0, while another person is interested in purchasing it. Here's what you need to know about the item: it's a beautifully carved antique wooden chair. It's in good condition, but could probably benefit from a fresh seat cushion.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Lena Goodwin\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nLena Goodwin's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are the buyer for this item, and your target price is $9.0. If you purchase it at a significantly higher price, be aware that you will incur a penalty. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello Lena, it's Lily here. I noticed you have an antique chair up for sale. It's quite lovely. What can you tell me about its history?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hello Lily, it's great to hear from you. This antique chair indeed has a thrilling story. It was originally owned by a local established artist who is known for his exquisite carpentry skills. He crafted this chair in the late 1800s, showcasing his signature detailed carvings. Besides its aesthetic appeal, it has remained in pretty good condition but might need a new seat cushion. I hope this piece could find a new life in your home, enjoying being part of beautiful moments. I've put it out for $15, but I'm open to some negotiation. Let me know what you think.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Thank you for sharing that history, Lena. The chair shows remarkable craftsmanship. Considering it needs a new seat cushion, which is another investment, would you consider letting it go for $9? This would help me take up the necessary refurbishing while also preserving the chair's original essence.\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"I understand your concerns connected with the additional investment, Lily. I value the fact that you appreciate the essence of the chair and want to preserve it. As a show of good faith, would you consider a settlement at $10, splitting the difference?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"You've made a fair proposal, Lena. I'm glad we managed to find some common ground in this negotiation. I accept the $10 offer. It's important to me that this chair keeps adding value to someone's life, just as it did in the past.\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"Fantastic, Lily. It's a joy to know that the chair will continue its history with someone who values its craftsmanship and story. Shall we proceed to discuss the logistics of payment and delivery?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Absolutely, Lena. Let's move on to the payment and delivery details. I'm grateful we could reach an agreement that respects the value of the chair.\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"I'm glad too, Lily. To make things easier regarding payment, I'll send you an invoice through email. As for delivery, I offer porch pickup from my residence. If that doesn't work for you, we can discuss other options. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"That sounds perfectly reasonable, Lena. An invoice through email works great and I'm more than happy to pick up the chair from your porch. I'll look forward to your email and we can coordinate the pickup. Thank you for this smooth transaction.\"\n\nTurn #9: Lena Goodwin said: \"You're welcome, Lily. I am also glad that everything went so smoothly. I'll send you the invoice shortly. Thanks again for your understanding and appreciation of the chair's history and craftsmanship. Looking forward for the chair to begin its new chapter under your custodianship!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Wonderful, Lena. I'm equally thrilled about this new chapter in the chair's history. I appreciate your efficiency and look forward to receiving the invoice. Thank you again for this pleasant transaction.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Antique Chair for $15.0, while another person is interested in purchasing it. Here's what you need to know about the item: it's a beautifully carved antique wooden chair. It's in good condition, but could probably benefit from a fresh seat cushion.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Lena Goodwin\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nLena Goodwin's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are the buyer for this item, and your target price is $9.0. If you purchase it at a significantly higher price, be aware that you will incur a penalty. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello Lena, it's Lily here. I noticed you have an antique chair up for sale. It's quite lovely. What can you tell me about its history?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hello Lily, it's great to hear from you. This antique chair indeed has a thrilling story. It was originally owned by a local established artist who is known for his exquisite carpentry skills. He crafted this chair in the late 1800s, showcasing his signature detailed carvings. Besides its aesthetic appeal, it has remained in pretty good condition but might need a new seat cushion. I hope this piece could find a new life in your home, enjoying being part of beautiful moments. I've put it out for $15, but I'm open to some negotiation. Let me know what you think.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Thank you for sharing that history, Lena. The chair shows remarkable craftsmanship. Considering it needs a new seat cushion, which is another investment, would you consider letting it go for $9? This would help me take up the necessary refurbishing while also preserving the chair's original essence.\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"I understand your concerns connected with the additional investment, Lily. I value the fact that you appreciate the essence of the chair and want to preserve it. As a show of good faith, would you consider a settlement at $10, splitting the difference?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"You've made a fair proposal, Lena. I'm glad we managed to find some common ground in this negotiation. I accept the $10 offer. It's important to me that this chair keeps adding value to someone's life, just as it did in the past.\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"Fantastic, Lily. It's a joy to know that the chair will continue its history with someone who values its craftsmanship and story. Shall we proceed to discuss the logistics of payment and delivery?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Absolutely, Lena. Let's move on to the payment and delivery details. I'm grateful we could reach an agreement that respects the value of the chair.\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"I'm glad too, Lily. To make things easier regarding payment, I'll send you an invoice through email. As for delivery, I offer porch pickup from my residence. If that doesn't work for you, we can discuss other options. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"That sounds perfectly reasonable, Lena. An invoice through email works great and I'm more than happy to pick up the chair from your porch. I'll look forward to your email and we can coordinate the pickup. Thank you for this smooth transaction.\"\n\nTurn #9: Lena Goodwin said: \"You're welcome, Lily. I am also glad that everything went so smoothly. I'll send you the invoice shortly. Thanks again for your understanding and appreciation of the chair's history and craftsmanship. Looking forward for the chair to begin its new chapter under your custodianship!\"\n\nTurn #10: Lily Greenberg said: \"Wonderful, Lena. I'm equally thrilled about this new chapter in the chair's history. I appreciate your efficiency and look forward to receiving the invoice. Thank you again for this pleasant transaction.\"\n\nTurn #11: Lena Goodwin said: \"I'm very glad to hear that, Lily. I'll get the ball rolling on the invoice and you'll receive it shortly in your email. Do not hesitate to reach out if you have any concerns or further questions. Thank you again.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That works well for me, Lena. Looking forward to receiving the invoice. I'll reach out if any further questions come up. Thank you!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nEsmeralda Solis's background: \nMiles Hawkins's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDavid: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Christian Moerlein Brewing Company Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nLarry: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nLynn: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Cray Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nDonald: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Advance Auto Parts Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nDennis: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nJane: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Planet Hollywood Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nHarvey: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: Sony Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nNinfa: Hobby: Quilting Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nAngelica: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Planet Hollywood Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \n\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hello there, Esmeralda. I couldn't help but overhear that you enjoy homebrewing. Is that right?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Oh, well, homebrewing isn't quite my cup of tea Miles. However, could you help me remember? I believe we might have a mutual friend who is also passionate about it. Does the name Harvey ring a bell? He loves amateur radio, and works at Sony, if that helps jog your memory.\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Oh, sure I know Harvey! Quite the interesting character, isn't he? He makes my passion for gardening seems rather mainstream in comparison. Speaking of gardening, I've got this friend, David, who is into homebrewing. He works at the Christian Moerlein Brewing Company. Do you happen to know him?\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"David from Christian Moerlein Brewing Company? Can't say I'm familiar with him. And speaking of creativity and uniqueness, I have a friend named Marie who's greatly involved in acting. She works at Southern New England Telephone and prefers spending her afternoons outdoors. Perhaps you've crossed paths with her as well?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Marie at Southern New England Telephone? Sorry, I can't say I've met her. However, speaking of the outdoors, I know a few people who also love the open air. For instance, there's Ninfa, she likes quilting and works at The J.M. Smucker Company, she's an early bird and prefers mornings. Does that ring any bells?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Antique Chair for $15.0, while another person is interested in purchasing it. Here's what you need to know about the item: it's a beautifully carved antique wooden chair. It's in good condition, but could probably benefit from a fresh seat cushion.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Lena Goodwin\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nLena Goodwin's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are the buyer for this item, and your target price is $9.0. If you purchase it at a significantly higher price, be aware that you will incur a penalty. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello Lena, it's Lily here. I noticed you have an antique chair up for sale. It's quite lovely. What can you tell me about its history?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hello Lily, it's great to hear from you. This antique chair indeed has a thrilling story. It was originally owned by a local established artist who is known for his exquisite carpentry skills. He crafted this chair in the late 1800s, showcasing his signature detailed carvings. Besides its aesthetic appeal, it has remained in pretty good condition but might need a new seat cushion. I hope this piece could find a new life in your home, enjoying being part of beautiful moments. I've put it out for $15, but I'm open to some negotiation. Let me know what you think.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Thank you for sharing that history, Lena. The chair shows remarkable craftsmanship. Considering it needs a new seat cushion, which is another investment, would you consider letting it go for $9? This would help me take up the necessary refurbishing while also preserving the chair's original essence.\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"I understand your concerns connected with the additional investment, Lily. I value the fact that you appreciate the essence of the chair and want to preserve it. As a show of good faith, would you consider a settlement at $10, splitting the difference?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"You've made a fair proposal, Lena. I'm glad we managed to find some common ground in this negotiation. I accept the $10 offer. It's important to me that this chair keeps adding value to someone's life, just as it did in the past.\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"Fantastic, Lily. It's a joy to know that the chair will continue its history with someone who values its craftsmanship and story. Shall we proceed to discuss the logistics of payment and delivery?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Absolutely, Lena. Let's move on to the payment and delivery details. I'm grateful we could reach an agreement that respects the value of the chair.\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"I'm glad too, Lily. To make things easier regarding payment, I'll send you an invoice through email. As for delivery, I offer porch pickup from my residence. If that doesn't work for you, we can discuss other options. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"That sounds perfectly reasonable, Lena. An invoice through email works great and I'm more than happy to pick up the chair from your porch. I'll look forward to your email and we can coordinate the pickup. Thank you for this smooth transaction.\"\n\nTurn #9: Lena Goodwin said: \"You're welcome, Lily. I am also glad that everything went so smoothly. I'll send you the invoice shortly. Thanks again for your understanding and appreciation of the chair's history and craftsmanship. Looking forward for the chair to begin its new chapter under your custodianship!\"\n\nTurn #10: Lily Greenberg said: \"Wonderful, Lena. I'm equally thrilled about this new chapter in the chair's history. I appreciate your efficiency and look forward to receiving the invoice. Thank you again for this pleasant transaction.\"\n\nTurn #11: Lena Goodwin said: \"I'm very glad to hear that, Lily. I'll get the ball rolling on the invoice and you'll receive it shortly in your email. Do not hesitate to reach out if you have any concerns or further questions. Thank you again.\"\n\nTurn #12: Lily Greenberg said: \"That works well for me, Lena. Looking forward to receiving the invoice. I'll reach out if any further questions come up. Thank you!\"\n\nTurn #13: Lena Goodwin said: \"It's been a pleasure dealing with you, Lily. I'll be sure the invoice gets to you promptly. Thank you for giving the chair a new home. Do have a wonderful day!\"\n\nTurn #14: Lily Greenberg said: \"It was a pleasure dealing with you as well, Lena. I'll anticipate the invoice in my email. Take care and have a splendid day too!\"\n\nTurn #15: Lena Goodwin left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Antique Chair for $15.0, while another person is interested in purchasing it. Here's what you need to know about the item: it's a beautifully carved antique wooden chair. It's in good condition, but could probably benefit from a fresh seat cushion.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Lena Goodwin\nLily Greenberg's background: \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: You are the seller for this item and your target price is $8. You should be aware that if you sell it for a price significantly lower than the target price, you will incur a penalty. However, if you manage to sell it for more than the target price, you stand to receive a bonus.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello Lena, it's Lily here. I noticed you have an antique chair up for sale. It's quite lovely. What can you tell me about its history?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hello Lily, it's great to hear from you. This antique chair indeed has a thrilling story. It was originally owned by a local established artist who is known for his exquisite carpentry skills. He crafted this chair in the late 1800s, showcasing his signature detailed carvings. Besides its aesthetic appeal, it has remained in pretty good condition but might need a new seat cushion. I hope this piece could find a new life in your home, enjoying being part of beautiful moments. I've put it out for $15, but I'm open to some negotiation. Let me know what you think.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Antique Chair for $15.0, while another person is interested in purchasing it. Here's what you need to know about the item: it's a beautifully carved antique wooden chair. It's in good condition, but could probably benefit from a fresh seat cushion.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Lena Goodwin\nLily Greenberg's background: \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: You are the seller for this item and your target price is $8. You should be aware that if you sell it for a price significantly lower than the target price, you will incur a penalty. However, if you manage to sell it for more than the target price, you stand to receive a bonus.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello Lena, it's Lily here. I noticed you have an antique chair up for sale. It's quite lovely. What can you tell me about its history?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hello Lily, it's great to hear from you. This antique chair indeed has a thrilling story. It was originally owned by a local established artist who is known for his exquisite carpentry skills. He crafted this chair in the late 1800s, showcasing his signature detailed carvings. Besides its aesthetic appeal, it has remained in pretty good condition but might need a new seat cushion. I hope this piece could find a new life in your home, enjoying being part of beautiful moments. I've put it out for $15, but I'm open to some negotiation. Let me know what you think.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Thank you for sharing that history, Lena. The chair shows remarkable craftsmanship. Considering it needs a new seat cushion, which is another investment, would you consider letting it go for $9? This would help me take up the necessary refurbishing while also preserving the chair's original essence.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'I understand your concerns connected with the additional investment, Lily. I value the fact that you appreciate the essence of the chair and want to preserve it. As a show of good faith, would you consider a settlement at $10, splitting the difference?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Antique Chair for $15.0, while another person is interested in purchasing it. Here's what you need to know about the item: it's a beautifully carved antique wooden chair. It's in good condition, but could probably benefit from a fresh seat cushion.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Lena Goodwin\nLily Greenberg's background: \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: You are the seller for this item and your target price is $8. You should be aware that if you sell it for a price significantly lower than the target price, you will incur a penalty. However, if you manage to sell it for more than the target price, you stand to receive a bonus.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello Lena, it's Lily here. I noticed you have an antique chair up for sale. It's quite lovely. What can you tell me about its history?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hello Lily, it's great to hear from you. This antique chair indeed has a thrilling story. It was originally owned by a local established artist who is known for his exquisite carpentry skills. He crafted this chair in the late 1800s, showcasing his signature detailed carvings. Besides its aesthetic appeal, it has remained in pretty good condition but might need a new seat cushion. I hope this piece could find a new life in your home, enjoying being part of beautiful moments. I've put it out for $15, but I'm open to some negotiation. Let me know what you think.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Thank you for sharing that history, Lena. The chair shows remarkable craftsmanship. Considering it needs a new seat cushion, which is another investment, would you consider letting it go for $9? This would help me take up the necessary refurbishing while also preserving the chair's original essence.\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"I understand your concerns connected with the additional investment, Lily. I value the fact that you appreciate the essence of the chair and want to preserve it. As a show of good faith, would you consider a settlement at $10, splitting the difference?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"You've made a fair proposal, Lena. I'm glad we managed to find some common ground in this negotiation. I accept the $10 offer. It's important to me that this chair keeps adding value to someone's life, just as it did in the past.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Fantastic, Lily. It's a joy to know that the chair will continue its history with someone who values its craftsmanship and story. Shall we proceed to discuss the logistics of payment and delivery?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Antique Chair for $15.0, while another person is interested in purchasing it. Here's what you need to know about the item: it's a beautifully carved antique wooden chair. It's in good condition, but could probably benefit from a fresh seat cushion.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Lena Goodwin\nLily Greenberg's background: \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: You are the seller for this item and your target price is $8. You should be aware that if you sell it for a price significantly lower than the target price, you will incur a penalty. However, if you manage to sell it for more than the target price, you stand to receive a bonus.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello Lena, it's Lily here. I noticed you have an antique chair up for sale. It's quite lovely. What can you tell me about its history?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hello Lily, it's great to hear from you. This antique chair indeed has a thrilling story. It was originally owned by a local established artist who is known for his exquisite carpentry skills. He crafted this chair in the late 1800s, showcasing his signature detailed carvings. Besides its aesthetic appeal, it has remained in pretty good condition but might need a new seat cushion. I hope this piece could find a new life in your home, enjoying being part of beautiful moments. I've put it out for $15, but I'm open to some negotiation. Let me know what you think.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Thank you for sharing that history, Lena. The chair shows remarkable craftsmanship. Considering it needs a new seat cushion, which is another investment, would you consider letting it go for $9? This would help me take up the necessary refurbishing while also preserving the chair's original essence.\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"I understand your concerns connected with the additional investment, Lily. I value the fact that you appreciate the essence of the chair and want to preserve it. As a show of good faith, would you consider a settlement at $10, splitting the difference?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"You've made a fair proposal, Lena. I'm glad we managed to find some common ground in this negotiation. I accept the $10 offer. It's important to me that this chair keeps adding value to someone's life, just as it did in the past.\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"Fantastic, Lily. It's a joy to know that the chair will continue its history with someone who values its craftsmanship and story. Shall we proceed to discuss the logistics of payment and delivery?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Absolutely, Lena. Let's move on to the payment and delivery details. I'm grateful we could reach an agreement that respects the value of the chair.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad too, Lily. To make things easier regarding payment, I'll send you an invoice through email. As for delivery, I offer porch pickup from my residence. If that doesn't work for you, we can discuss other options. How does that sound?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Antique Chair for $15.0, while another person is interested in purchasing it. Here's what you need to know about the item: it's a beautifully carved antique wooden chair. It's in good condition, but could probably benefit from a fresh seat cushion.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Lena Goodwin\nLily Greenberg's background: \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: You are the seller for this item and your target price is $8. You should be aware that if you sell it for a price significantly lower than the target price, you will incur a penalty. However, if you manage to sell it for more than the target price, you stand to receive a bonus.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello Lena, it's Lily here. I noticed you have an antique chair up for sale. It's quite lovely. What can you tell me about its history?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hello Lily, it's great to hear from you. This antique chair indeed has a thrilling story. It was originally owned by a local established artist who is known for his exquisite carpentry skills. He crafted this chair in the late 1800s, showcasing his signature detailed carvings. Besides its aesthetic appeal, it has remained in pretty good condition but might need a new seat cushion. I hope this piece could find a new life in your home, enjoying being part of beautiful moments. I've put it out for $15, but I'm open to some negotiation. Let me know what you think.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Thank you for sharing that history, Lena. The chair shows remarkable craftsmanship. Considering it needs a new seat cushion, which is another investment, would you consider letting it go for $9? This would help me take up the necessary refurbishing while also preserving the chair's original essence.\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"I understand your concerns connected with the additional investment, Lily. I value the fact that you appreciate the essence of the chair and want to preserve it. As a show of good faith, would you consider a settlement at $10, splitting the difference?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"You've made a fair proposal, Lena. I'm glad we managed to find some common ground in this negotiation. I accept the $10 offer. It's important to me that this chair keeps adding value to someone's life, just as it did in the past.\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"Fantastic, Lily. It's a joy to know that the chair will continue its history with someone who values its craftsmanship and story. Shall we proceed to discuss the logistics of payment and delivery?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Absolutely, Lena. Let's move on to the payment and delivery details. I'm grateful we could reach an agreement that respects the value of the chair.\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"I'm glad too, Lily. To make things easier regarding payment, I'll send you an invoice through email. As for delivery, I offer porch pickup from my residence. If that doesn't work for you, we can discuss other options. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"That sounds perfectly reasonable, Lena. An invoice through email works great and I'm more than happy to pick up the chair from your porch. I'll look forward to your email and we can coordinate the pickup. Thank you for this smooth transaction.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're welcome, Lily. I am also glad that everything went so smoothly. I'll send you the invoice shortly. Thanks again for your understanding and appreciation of the chair's history and craftsmanship. Looking forward for the chair to begin its new chapter under your custodianship!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Antique Chair for $15.0, while another person is interested in purchasing it. Here's what you need to know about the item: it's a beautifully carved antique wooden chair. It's in good condition, but could probably benefit from a fresh seat cushion.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Lena Goodwin\nLily Greenberg's background: \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: You are the seller for this item and your target price is $8. You should be aware that if you sell it for a price significantly lower than the target price, you will incur a penalty. However, if you manage to sell it for more than the target price, you stand to receive a bonus.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello Lena, it's Lily here. I noticed you have an antique chair up for sale. It's quite lovely. What can you tell me about its history?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hello Lily, it's great to hear from you. This antique chair indeed has a thrilling story. It was originally owned by a local established artist who is known for his exquisite carpentry skills. He crafted this chair in the late 1800s, showcasing his signature detailed carvings. Besides its aesthetic appeal, it has remained in pretty good condition but might need a new seat cushion. I hope this piece could find a new life in your home, enjoying being part of beautiful moments. I've put it out for $15, but I'm open to some negotiation. Let me know what you think.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Thank you for sharing that history, Lena. The chair shows remarkable craftsmanship. Considering it needs a new seat cushion, which is another investment, would you consider letting it go for $9? This would help me take up the necessary refurbishing while also preserving the chair's original essence.\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"I understand your concerns connected with the additional investment, Lily. I value the fact that you appreciate the essence of the chair and want to preserve it. As a show of good faith, would you consider a settlement at $10, splitting the difference?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"You've made a fair proposal, Lena. I'm glad we managed to find some common ground in this negotiation. I accept the $10 offer. It's important to me that this chair keeps adding value to someone's life, just as it did in the past.\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"Fantastic, Lily. It's a joy to know that the chair will continue its history with someone who values its craftsmanship and story. Shall we proceed to discuss the logistics of payment and delivery?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Absolutely, Lena. Let's move on to the payment and delivery details. I'm grateful we could reach an agreement that respects the value of the chair.\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"I'm glad too, Lily. To make things easier regarding payment, I'll send you an invoice through email. As for delivery, I offer porch pickup from my residence. If that doesn't work for you, we can discuss other options. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"That sounds perfectly reasonable, Lena. An invoice through email works great and I'm more than happy to pick up the chair from your porch. I'll look forward to your email and we can coordinate the pickup. Thank you for this smooth transaction.\"\n\nTurn #9: Lena Goodwin said: \"You're welcome, Lily. I am also glad that everything went so smoothly. I'll send you the invoice shortly. Thanks again for your understanding and appreciation of the chair's history and craftsmanship. Looking forward for the chair to begin its new chapter under your custodianship!\"\n\nTurn #10: Lily Greenberg said: \"Wonderful, Lena. I'm equally thrilled about this new chapter in the chair's history. I appreciate your efficiency and look forward to receiving the invoice. Thank you again for this pleasant transaction.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm very glad to hear that, Lily. I'll get the ball rolling on the invoice and you'll receive it shortly in your email. Do not hesitate to reach out if you have any concerns or further questions. Thank you again.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Antique Chair for $15.0, while another person is interested in purchasing it. Here's what you need to know about the item: it's a beautifully carved antique wooden chair. It's in good condition, but could probably benefit from a fresh seat cushion.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Lena Goodwin\nLily Greenberg's background: \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: You are the seller for this item and your target price is $8. You should be aware that if you sell it for a price significantly lower than the target price, you will incur a penalty. However, if you manage to sell it for more than the target price, you stand to receive a bonus.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello Lena, it's Lily here. I noticed you have an antique chair up for sale. It's quite lovely. What can you tell me about its history?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hello Lily, it's great to hear from you. This antique chair indeed has a thrilling story. It was originally owned by a local established artist who is known for his exquisite carpentry skills. He crafted this chair in the late 1800s, showcasing his signature detailed carvings. Besides its aesthetic appeal, it has remained in pretty good condition but might need a new seat cushion. I hope this piece could find a new life in your home, enjoying being part of beautiful moments. I've put it out for $15, but I'm open to some negotiation. Let me know what you think.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Thank you for sharing that history, Lena. The chair shows remarkable craftsmanship. Considering it needs a new seat cushion, which is another investment, would you consider letting it go for $9? This would help me take up the necessary refurbishing while also preserving the chair's original essence.\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"I understand your concerns connected with the additional investment, Lily. I value the fact that you appreciate the essence of the chair and want to preserve it. As a show of good faith, would you consider a settlement at $10, splitting the difference?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"You've made a fair proposal, Lena. I'm glad we managed to find some common ground in this negotiation. I accept the $10 offer. It's important to me that this chair keeps adding value to someone's life, just as it did in the past.\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"Fantastic, Lily. It's a joy to know that the chair will continue its history with someone who values its craftsmanship and story. Shall we proceed to discuss the logistics of payment and delivery?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Absolutely, Lena. Let's move on to the payment and delivery details. I'm grateful we could reach an agreement that respects the value of the chair.\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"I'm glad too, Lily. To make things easier regarding payment, I'll send you an invoice through email. As for delivery, I offer porch pickup from my residence. If that doesn't work for you, we can discuss other options. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"That sounds perfectly reasonable, Lena. An invoice through email works great and I'm more than happy to pick up the chair from your porch. I'll look forward to your email and we can coordinate the pickup. Thank you for this smooth transaction.\"\n\nTurn #9: Lena Goodwin said: \"You're welcome, Lily. I am also glad that everything went so smoothly. I'll send you the invoice shortly. Thanks again for your understanding and appreciation of the chair's history and craftsmanship. Looking forward for the chair to begin its new chapter under your custodianship!\"\n\nTurn #10: Lily Greenberg said: \"Wonderful, Lena. I'm equally thrilled about this new chapter in the chair's history. I appreciate your efficiency and look forward to receiving the invoice. Thank you again for this pleasant transaction.\"\n\nTurn #11: Lena Goodwin said: \"I'm very glad to hear that, Lily. I'll get the ball rolling on the invoice and you'll receive it shortly in your email. Do not hesitate to reach out if you have any concerns or further questions. Thank you again.\"\n\nTurn #12: Lily Greenberg said: \"That works well for me, Lena. Looking forward to receiving the invoice. I'll reach out if any further questions come up. Thank you!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"It's been a pleasure dealing with you, Lily. I'll be sure the invoice gets to you promptly. Thank you for giving the chair a new home. Do have a wonderful day!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Antique Chair for $15.0, while another person is interested in purchasing it. Here's what you need to know about the item: it's a beautifully carved antique wooden chair. It's in good condition, but could probably benefit from a fresh seat cushion.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Lena Goodwin\nLily Greenberg's background: \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: You are the seller for this item and your target price is $8. You should be aware that if you sell it for a price significantly lower than the target price, you will incur a penalty. However, if you manage to sell it for more than the target price, you stand to receive a bonus.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello Lena, it's Lily here. I noticed you have an antique chair up for sale. It's quite lovely. What can you tell me about its history?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hello Lily, it's great to hear from you. This antique chair indeed has a thrilling story. It was originally owned by a local established artist who is known for his exquisite carpentry skills. He crafted this chair in the late 1800s, showcasing his signature detailed carvings. Besides its aesthetic appeal, it has remained in pretty good condition but might need a new seat cushion. I hope this piece could find a new life in your home, enjoying being part of beautiful moments. I've put it out for $15, but I'm open to some negotiation. Let me know what you think.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Thank you for sharing that history, Lena. The chair shows remarkable craftsmanship. Considering it needs a new seat cushion, which is another investment, would you consider letting it go for $9? This would help me take up the necessary refurbishing while also preserving the chair's original essence.\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"I understand your concerns connected with the additional investment, Lily. I value the fact that you appreciate the essence of the chair and want to preserve it. As a show of good faith, would you consider a settlement at $10, splitting the difference?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"You've made a fair proposal, Lena. I'm glad we managed to find some common ground in this negotiation. I accept the $10 offer. It's important to me that this chair keeps adding value to someone's life, just as it did in the past.\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"Fantastic, Lily. It's a joy to know that the chair will continue its history with someone who values its craftsmanship and story. Shall we proceed to discuss the logistics of payment and delivery?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Absolutely, Lena. Let's move on to the payment and delivery details. I'm grateful we could reach an agreement that respects the value of the chair.\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"I'm glad too, Lily. To make things easier regarding payment, I'll send you an invoice through email. As for delivery, I offer porch pickup from my residence. If that doesn't work for you, we can discuss other options. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"That sounds perfectly reasonable, Lena. An invoice through email works great and I'm more than happy to pick up the chair from your porch. I'll look forward to your email and we can coordinate the pickup. Thank you for this smooth transaction.\"\n\nTurn #9: Lena Goodwin said: \"You're welcome, Lily. I am also glad that everything went so smoothly. I'll send you the invoice shortly. Thanks again for your understanding and appreciation of the chair's history and craftsmanship. Looking forward for the chair to begin its new chapter under your custodianship!\"\n\nTurn #10: Lily Greenberg said: \"Wonderful, Lena. I'm equally thrilled about this new chapter in the chair's history. I appreciate your efficiency and look forward to receiving the invoice. Thank you again for this pleasant transaction.\"\n\nTurn #11: Lena Goodwin said: \"I'm very glad to hear that, Lily. I'll get the ball rolling on the invoice and you'll receive it shortly in your email. Do not hesitate to reach out if you have any concerns or further questions. Thank you again.\"\n\nTurn #12: Lily Greenberg said: \"That works well for me, Lena. Looking forward to receiving the invoice. I'll reach out if any further questions come up. Thank you!\"\n\nTurn #13: Lena Goodwin said: \"It's been a pleasure dealing with you, Lily. I'll be sure the invoice gets to you promptly. Thank you for giving the chair a new home. Do have a wonderful day!\"\n\nTurn #14: Lily Greenberg said: \"It was a pleasure dealing with you as well, Lena. I'll anticipate the invoice in my email. Take care and have a splendid day too!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sasha Ramirez, your task is to act/speak as Sasha Ramirez would, keeping in mind Sasha Ramirez's social goal.\nYou can find Sasha Ramirez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sasha Ramirez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sasha Ramirez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Amara Hartley\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. Sasha's secrets: She covered up a crime her brother committed.\nAmara Hartley's background: \nSasha Ramirez's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nGracie: School: Ithaca College Major: Mathematics Education Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nAda: School: Tulane University Major: Computer Engineering Company: Briggs & Stratton Location Preference: indoor \nSergio: School: LeTourneau University Major: Economics Company: Savers Location Preference: indoor \nWilliam: School: Eastern Michigan University Major: Ceramic Engineering Company: Xenco Medical Location Preference: indoor \nHarry: School: Creighton University Major: Computer Engineering Company: Speedway Motorsports Location Preference: indoor \nTyler: School: Columbia College Chicago Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nRichard: School: University of Dubuque Major: German Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: indoor \nRandy: School: Holy Cross College Major: Library Science Company: American Licorice Company Location Preference: indoor \nMarquerite: School: Ithaca College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nJack: School: Creighton University Major: Chinese Company: Speedway Motorsports Location Preference: outdoor \nCody: School: Metropolitan State University Major: Mathematics Education Company: LinkedIn Location Preference: indoor \nShirley: School: Augsburg College Major: Senior High Education Company: Demaco Location Preference: indoor \n\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hi there, I'm Sasha. Nice to meet you. Have you ever been to Ithaca College or Creighton University? I have a couple of friends who attended there.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sasha Ramirez, your task is to act/speak as Sasha Ramirez would, keeping in mind Sasha Ramirez's social goal.\nYou can find Sasha Ramirez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sasha Ramirez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sasha Ramirez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Amara Hartley\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. Sasha's secrets: She covered up a crime her brother committed.\nAmara Hartley's background: \nSasha Ramirez's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nGracie: School: Ithaca College Major: Mathematics Education Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nAda: School: Tulane University Major: Computer Engineering Company: Briggs & Stratton Location Preference: indoor \nSergio: School: LeTourneau University Major: Economics Company: Savers Location Preference: indoor \nWilliam: School: Eastern Michigan University Major: Ceramic Engineering Company: Xenco Medical Location Preference: indoor \nHarry: School: Creighton University Major: Computer Engineering Company: Speedway Motorsports Location Preference: indoor \nTyler: School: Columbia College Chicago Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nRichard: School: University of Dubuque Major: German Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: indoor \nRandy: School: Holy Cross College Major: Library Science Company: American Licorice Company Location Preference: indoor \nMarquerite: School: Ithaca College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nJack: School: Creighton University Major: Chinese Company: Speedway Motorsports Location Preference: outdoor \nCody: School: Metropolitan State University Major: Mathematics Education Company: LinkedIn Location Preference: indoor \nShirley: School: Augsburg College Major: Senior High Education Company: Demaco Location Preference: indoor \n\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hi there, I'm Sasha. Nice to meet you. Have you ever been to Ithaca College or Creighton University? I have a couple of friends who attended there.\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"Hello Sasha, it's a pleasure to meet you. I'm Amara. I haven't personally attended either of those universities, but I do have a couple of friends who did their studies at Ithaca College. What did your friends study there?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oh, that's cool! My friend Gracie studied Mathematics Education at Ithaca College, and Marguerite majored in Middle Eastern Languages. Maybe they know your friends!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sasha Ramirez, your task is to act/speak as Sasha Ramirez would, keeping in mind Sasha Ramirez's social goal.\nYou can find Sasha Ramirez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sasha Ramirez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sasha Ramirez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Amara Hartley\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. Sasha's secrets: She covered up a crime her brother committed.\nAmara Hartley's background: \nSasha Ramirez's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nGracie: School: Ithaca College Major: Mathematics Education Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nAda: School: Tulane University Major: Computer Engineering Company: Briggs & Stratton Location Preference: indoor \nSergio: School: LeTourneau University Major: Economics Company: Savers Location Preference: indoor \nWilliam: School: Eastern Michigan University Major: Ceramic Engineering Company: Xenco Medical Location Preference: indoor \nHarry: School: Creighton University Major: Computer Engineering Company: Speedway Motorsports Location Preference: indoor \nTyler: School: Columbia College Chicago Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nRichard: School: University of Dubuque Major: German Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: indoor \nRandy: School: Holy Cross College Major: Library Science Company: American Licorice Company Location Preference: indoor \nMarquerite: School: Ithaca College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nJack: School: Creighton University Major: Chinese Company: Speedway Motorsports Location Preference: outdoor \nCody: School: Metropolitan State University Major: Mathematics Education Company: LinkedIn Location Preference: indoor \nShirley: School: Augsburg College Major: Senior High Education Company: Demaco Location Preference: indoor \n\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hi there, I'm Sasha. Nice to meet you. Have you ever been to Ithaca College or Creighton University? I have a couple of friends who attended there.\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"Hello Sasha, it's a pleasure to meet you. I'm Amara. I haven't personally attended either of those universities, but I do have a couple of friends who did their studies at Ithaca College. What did your friends study there?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Oh, that's cool! My friend Gracie studied Mathematics Education at Ithaca College, and Marguerite majored in Middle Eastern Languages. Maybe they know your friends!\"\n\nTurn #3: Amara Hartley said: \"That's quite interesting! My friend Brian also studied at Ithaca College. He majored in Asian & Pacific Area Studies. And as for Middle Eastern Languages, my friend Kelly focused on that. I wonder if Gracie or Marguerite had any classes with them!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"It's a small world, isn't it? I can definitely connect with Gracie and Marguerite if they had any classes with Brian or Kelly. By any chance, do your friends work for any notable companies? I have a friend, Ada, who's a super talented Computer Engineer working at Briggs & Stratton.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sasha Ramirez, your task is to act/speak as Sasha Ramirez would, keeping in mind Sasha Ramirez's social goal.\nYou can find Sasha Ramirez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sasha Ramirez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sasha Ramirez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Amara Hartley\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. Sasha's secrets: She covered up a crime her brother committed.\nAmara Hartley's background: \nSasha Ramirez's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nGracie: School: Ithaca College Major: Mathematics Education Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nAda: School: Tulane University Major: Computer Engineering Company: Briggs & Stratton Location Preference: indoor \nSergio: School: LeTourneau University Major: Economics Company: Savers Location Preference: indoor \nWilliam: School: Eastern Michigan University Major: Ceramic Engineering Company: Xenco Medical Location Preference: indoor \nHarry: School: Creighton University Major: Computer Engineering Company: Speedway Motorsports Location Preference: indoor \nTyler: School: Columbia College Chicago Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nRichard: School: University of Dubuque Major: German Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: indoor \nRandy: School: Holy Cross College Major: Library Science Company: American Licorice Company Location Preference: indoor \nMarquerite: School: Ithaca College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nJack: School: Creighton University Major: Chinese Company: Speedway Motorsports Location Preference: outdoor \nCody: School: Metropolitan State University Major: Mathematics Education Company: LinkedIn Location Preference: indoor \nShirley: School: Augsburg College Major: Senior High Education Company: Demaco Location Preference: indoor \n\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hi there, I'm Sasha. Nice to meet you. Have you ever been to Ithaca College or Creighton University? I have a couple of friends who attended there.\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"Hello Sasha, it's a pleasure to meet you. I'm Amara. I haven't personally attended either of those universities, but I do have a couple of friends who did their studies at Ithaca College. What did your friends study there?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Oh, that's cool! My friend Gracie studied Mathematics Education at Ithaca College, and Marguerite majored in Middle Eastern Languages. Maybe they know your friends!\"\n\nTurn #3: Amara Hartley said: \"That's quite interesting! My friend Brian also studied at Ithaca College. He majored in Asian & Pacific Area Studies. And as for Middle Eastern Languages, my friend Kelly focused on that. I wonder if Gracie or Marguerite had any classes with them!\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"It's a small world, isn't it? I can definitely connect with Gracie and Marguerite if they had any classes with Brian or Kelly. By any chance, do your friends work for any notable companies? I have a friend, Ada, who's a super talented Computer Engineer working at Briggs & Stratton.\"\n\nTurn #5: Amara Hartley said: \"Absolutely, it indeed is a small world, Sasha. Brian now works for Orange Micro, and Kelly is with Mesa Airlines. Maybe Ada knows of them! Incidentally, I also have a friend named Lloyd who works at Illinois Tool Works. He studied Geophysical Engineering at Eastern Michigan University. Have you heard of him or his company?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'That rings a bell! Yeah, I have a friend named Richard who was also at Eastern Michigan University, although he studied German. And yes, he works at Illinois Tool Works now! Perhaps they know each other. But speaking about working environments, do your friends have any preferences when it comes to indoor or outdoor locations?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sasha Ramirez, your task is to act/speak as Sasha Ramirez would, keeping in mind Sasha Ramirez's social goal.\nYou can find Sasha Ramirez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sasha Ramirez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sasha Ramirez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Amara Hartley\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. Sasha's secrets: She covered up a crime her brother committed.\nAmara Hartley's background: \nSasha Ramirez's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nGracie: School: Ithaca College Major: Mathematics Education Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nAda: School: Tulane University Major: Computer Engineering Company: Briggs & Stratton Location Preference: indoor \nSergio: School: LeTourneau University Major: Economics Company: Savers Location Preference: indoor \nWilliam: School: Eastern Michigan University Major: Ceramic Engineering Company: Xenco Medical Location Preference: indoor \nHarry: School: Creighton University Major: Computer Engineering Company: Speedway Motorsports Location Preference: indoor \nTyler: School: Columbia College Chicago Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nRichard: School: University of Dubuque Major: German Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: indoor \nRandy: School: Holy Cross College Major: Library Science Company: American Licorice Company Location Preference: indoor \nMarquerite: School: Ithaca College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nJack: School: Creighton University Major: Chinese Company: Speedway Motorsports Location Preference: outdoor \nCody: School: Metropolitan State University Major: Mathematics Education Company: LinkedIn Location Preference: indoor \nShirley: School: Augsburg College Major: Senior High Education Company: Demaco Location Preference: indoor \n\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hi there, I'm Sasha. Nice to meet you. Have you ever been to Ithaca College or Creighton University? I have a couple of friends who attended there.\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"Hello Sasha, it's a pleasure to meet you. I'm Amara. I haven't personally attended either of those universities, but I do have a couple of friends who did their studies at Ithaca College. What did your friends study there?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Oh, that's cool! My friend Gracie studied Mathematics Education at Ithaca College, and Marguerite majored in Middle Eastern Languages. Maybe they know your friends!\"\n\nTurn #3: Amara Hartley said: \"That's quite interesting! My friend Brian also studied at Ithaca College. He majored in Asian & Pacific Area Studies. And as for Middle Eastern Languages, my friend Kelly focused on that. I wonder if Gracie or Marguerite had any classes with them!\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"It's a small world, isn't it? I can definitely connect with Gracie and Marguerite if they had any classes with Brian or Kelly. By any chance, do your friends work for any notable companies? I have a friend, Ada, who's a super talented Computer Engineer working at Briggs & Stratton.\"\n\nTurn #5: Amara Hartley said: \"Absolutely, it indeed is a small world, Sasha. Brian now works for Orange Micro, and Kelly is with Mesa Airlines. Maybe Ada knows of them! Incidentally, I also have a friend named Lloyd who works at Illinois Tool Works. He studied Geophysical Engineering at Eastern Michigan University. Have you heard of him or his company?\"\n\nTurn #6: Sasha Ramirez said: \"That rings a bell! Yeah, I have a friend named Richard who was also at Eastern Michigan University, although he studied German. And yes, he works at Illinois Tool Works now! Perhaps they know each other. But speaking about working environments, do your friends have any preferences when it comes to indoor or outdoor locations?\"\n\nTurn #7: \n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Amara Hartley\nSasha Ramirez's background: \nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nSasha Ramirez's goal: Unknown\nAmara Hartley's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nKathleen: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Greek Company: Demaco Location Preference: indoor \nCarol: School: Hood College Major: Library Science Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: outdoor \nHerman: School: University of Puget Sound Major: Library Science Company: Mesa Airlines Location Preference: indoor \nMatthew: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Asian & Pacific Area Studies Company: Savers Location Preference: indoor \nMark: School: University of Arkansas - Monticello Major: Economics Company: Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Location Preference: outdoor \nDeborah: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Pre-Law Company: Aramark Location Preference: outdoor \nKelly: School: Hood College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Mesa Airlines Location Preference: outdoor \nGracie: School: Ithaca College Major: Mathematics Education Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nEtta: School: University of Arkansas - Monticello Major: Judaism & Jewish Studies Company: Aramark Location Preference: outdoor \nNatasha: School: Thomas Edison State College Major: Linguistics Company: Invacare Corporation Location Preference: outdoor \nLloyd: School: Eastern Michigan University Major: Geophysical Engineering Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: outdoor \nBrian: School: Ithaca College Major: Asian & Pacific Area Studies Company: Orange Micro Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hi there, I'm Sasha. Nice to meet you. Have you ever been to Ithaca College or Creighton University? I have a couple of friends who attended there.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hello Sasha, it's a pleasure to meet you. I'm Amara. I haven't personally attended either of those universities, but I do have a couple of friends who did their studies at Ithaca College. What did your friends study there?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Amara Hartley\nSasha Ramirez's background: \nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nSasha Ramirez's goal: Unknown\nAmara Hartley's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nKathleen: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Greek Company: Demaco Location Preference: indoor \nCarol: School: Hood College Major: Library Science Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: outdoor \nHerman: School: University of Puget Sound Major: Library Science Company: Mesa Airlines Location Preference: indoor \nMatthew: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Asian & Pacific Area Studies Company: Savers Location Preference: indoor \nMark: School: University of Arkansas - Monticello Major: Economics Company: Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Location Preference: outdoor \nDeborah: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Pre-Law Company: Aramark Location Preference: outdoor \nKelly: School: Hood College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Mesa Airlines Location Preference: outdoor \nGracie: School: Ithaca College Major: Mathematics Education Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nEtta: School: University of Arkansas - Monticello Major: Judaism & Jewish Studies Company: Aramark Location Preference: outdoor \nNatasha: School: Thomas Edison State College Major: Linguistics Company: Invacare Corporation Location Preference: outdoor \nLloyd: School: Eastern Michigan University Major: Geophysical Engineering Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: outdoor \nBrian: School: Ithaca College Major: Asian & Pacific Area Studies Company: Orange Micro Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hi there, I'm Sasha. Nice to meet you. Have you ever been to Ithaca College or Creighton University? I have a couple of friends who attended there.\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"Hello Sasha, it's a pleasure to meet you. I'm Amara. I haven't personally attended either of those universities, but I do have a couple of friends who did their studies at Ithaca College. What did your friends study there?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Oh, that's cool! My friend Gracie studied Mathematics Education at Ithaca College, and Marguerite majored in Middle Eastern Languages. Maybe they know your friends!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's quite interesting! My friend Brian also studied at Ithaca College. He majored in Asian & Pacific Area Studies. And as for Middle Eastern Languages, my friend Kelly focused on that. I wonder if Gracie or Marguerite had any classes with them!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Amara Hartley\nSasha Ramirez's background: \nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nSasha Ramirez's goal: Unknown\nAmara Hartley's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nKathleen: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Greek Company: Demaco Location Preference: indoor \nCarol: School: Hood College Major: Library Science Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: outdoor \nHerman: School: University of Puget Sound Major: Library Science Company: Mesa Airlines Location Preference: indoor \nMatthew: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Asian & Pacific Area Studies Company: Savers Location Preference: indoor \nMark: School: University of Arkansas - Monticello Major: Economics Company: Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Location Preference: outdoor \nDeborah: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Pre-Law Company: Aramark Location Preference: outdoor \nKelly: School: Hood College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Mesa Airlines Location Preference: outdoor \nGracie: School: Ithaca College Major: Mathematics Education Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nEtta: School: University of Arkansas - Monticello Major: Judaism & Jewish Studies Company: Aramark Location Preference: outdoor \nNatasha: School: Thomas Edison State College Major: Linguistics Company: Invacare Corporation Location Preference: outdoor \nLloyd: School: Eastern Michigan University Major: Geophysical Engineering Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: outdoor \nBrian: School: Ithaca College Major: Asian & Pacific Area Studies Company: Orange Micro Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hi there, I'm Sasha. Nice to meet you. Have you ever been to Ithaca College or Creighton University? I have a couple of friends who attended there.\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"Hello Sasha, it's a pleasure to meet you. I'm Amara. I haven't personally attended either of those universities, but I do have a couple of friends who did their studies at Ithaca College. What did your friends study there?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Oh, that's cool! My friend Gracie studied Mathematics Education at Ithaca College, and Marguerite majored in Middle Eastern Languages. Maybe they know your friends!\"\n\nTurn #3: Amara Hartley said: \"That's quite interesting! My friend Brian also studied at Ithaca College. He majored in Asian & Pacific Area Studies. And as for Middle Eastern Languages, my friend Kelly focused on that. I wonder if Gracie or Marguerite had any classes with them!\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"It's a small world, isn't it? I can definitely connect with Gracie and Marguerite if they had any classes with Brian or Kelly. By any chance, do your friends work for any notable companies? I have a friend, Ada, who's a super talented Computer Engineer working at Briggs & Stratton.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Absolutely, it indeed is a small world, Sasha. Brian now works for Orange Micro, and Kelly is with Mesa Airlines. Maybe Ada knows of them! Incidentally, I also have a friend named Lloyd who works at Illinois Tool Works. He studied Geophysical Engineering at Eastern Michigan University. Have you heard of him or his company?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Amara Hartley\nSasha Ramirez's background: \nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nSasha Ramirez's goal: Unknown\nAmara Hartley's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nKathleen: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Greek Company: Demaco Location Preference: indoor \nCarol: School: Hood College Major: Library Science Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: outdoor \nHerman: School: University of Puget Sound Major: Library Science Company: Mesa Airlines Location Preference: indoor \nMatthew: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Asian & Pacific Area Studies Company: Savers Location Preference: indoor \nMark: School: University of Arkansas - Monticello Major: Economics Company: Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Location Preference: outdoor \nDeborah: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Pre-Law Company: Aramark Location Preference: outdoor \nKelly: School: Hood College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Mesa Airlines Location Preference: outdoor \nGracie: School: Ithaca College Major: Mathematics Education Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nEtta: School: University of Arkansas - Monticello Major: Judaism & Jewish Studies Company: Aramark Location Preference: outdoor \nNatasha: School: Thomas Edison State College Major: Linguistics Company: Invacare Corporation Location Preference: outdoor \nLloyd: School: Eastern Michigan University Major: Geophysical Engineering Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: outdoor \nBrian: School: Ithaca College Major: Asian & Pacific Area Studies Company: Orange Micro Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hi there, I'm Sasha. Nice to meet you. Have you ever been to Ithaca College or Creighton University? I have a couple of friends who attended there.\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"Hello Sasha, it's a pleasure to meet you. I'm Amara. I haven't personally attended either of those universities, but I do have a couple of friends who did their studies at Ithaca College. What did your friends study there?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Oh, that's cool! My friend Gracie studied Mathematics Education at Ithaca College, and Marguerite majored in Middle Eastern Languages. Maybe they know your friends!\"\n\nTurn #3: Amara Hartley said: \"That's quite interesting! My friend Brian also studied at Ithaca College. He majored in Asian & Pacific Area Studies. And as for Middle Eastern Languages, my friend Kelly focused on that. I wonder if Gracie or Marguerite had any classes with them!\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"It's a small world, isn't it? I can definitely connect with Gracie and Marguerite if they had any classes with Brian or Kelly. By any chance, do your friends work for any notable companies? I have a friend, Ada, who's a super talented Computer Engineer working at Briggs & Stratton.\"\n\nTurn #5: Amara Hartley said: \"Absolutely, it indeed is a small world, Sasha. Brian now works for Orange Micro, and Kelly is with Mesa Airlines. Maybe Ada knows of them! Incidentally, I also have a friend named Lloyd who works at Illinois Tool Works. He studied Geophysical Engineering at Eastern Michigan University. Have you heard of him or his company?\"\n\nTurn #6: Sasha Ramirez said: \"That rings a bell! Yeah, I have a friend named Richard who was also at Eastern Michigan University, although he studied German. And yes, he works at Illinois Tool Works now! Perhaps they know each other. But speaking about working environments, do your friends have any preferences when it comes to indoor or outdoor locations?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a BMW Z3 for $5000.0, while another individual is interested in purchasing it. Here's a brief description of the car: The BMW Z3 is in need of a good home. It operates smoothly without any problems and is known for its fuel efficiency and sporty appearance. The mileage is relatively low for its age. It's an opportunity not to be missed, so come and get it before it's gone. A smog certificate is readily available.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are the buyer for this item and your target price is $4600. You should be aware that if you purchase it at a price significantly higher than your target, you will incur a penalty. However, if you manage to secure it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Greetings Hendrick. I'm Lily, I've come across the advertisement showing the BMW Z3 for $5000 and it sparked my interest. I am invested in the well-kept status and sporty style of the vehicle. Would you possibly consider negotiating the price though?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a BMW Z3 for $5000.0, while another individual is interested in purchasing it. Here's a brief description of the car: The BMW Z3 is in need of a good home. It operates smoothly without any problems and is known for its fuel efficiency and sporty appearance. The mileage is relatively low for its age. It's an opportunity not to be missed, so come and get it before it's gone. A smog certificate is readily available.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are the buyer for this item and your target price is $4600. You should be aware that if you purchase it at a price significantly higher than your target, you will incur a penalty. However, if you manage to secure it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Greetings Hendrick. I'm Lily, I've come across the advertisement showing the BMW Z3 for $5000 and it sparked my interest. I am invested in the well-kept status and sporty style of the vehicle. Would you possibly consider negotiating the price though?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello Lily! I'm delighted that you're interested in this lovely vehicle. And I appreciate your request to talk price, which shows your serious commitment. I can consider lowering the price to $4800. However, I think this price is very fair considering the state of the vehicle, especially it being a BMW Z3. What do you think about that?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I agree, Hendrick, the vehicle's status justifies your asking price, and I appreciate your willingness to negotiate. As a potential long-term owner, I think a price of $4600 would fairly reflect its minimal dependencies and upkeep costs. Could we agree on that price?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a BMW Z3 for $5000.0, while another individual is interested in purchasing it. Here's a brief description of the car: The BMW Z3 is in need of a good home. It operates smoothly without any problems and is known for its fuel efficiency and sporty appearance. The mileage is relatively low for its age. It's an opportunity not to be missed, so come and get it before it's gone. A smog certificate is readily available.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are the buyer for this item and your target price is $4600. You should be aware that if you purchase it at a price significantly higher than your target, you will incur a penalty. However, if you manage to secure it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Greetings Hendrick. I'm Lily, I've come across the advertisement showing the BMW Z3 for $5000 and it sparked my interest. I am invested in the well-kept status and sporty style of the vehicle. Would you possibly consider negotiating the price though?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello Lily! I'm delighted that you're interested in this lovely vehicle. And I appreciate your request to talk price, which shows your serious commitment. I can consider lowering the price to $4800. However, I think this price is very fair considering the state of the vehicle, especially it being a BMW Z3. What do you think about that?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"I agree, Hendrick, the vehicle's status justifies your asking price, and I appreciate your willingness to negotiate. As a potential long-term owner, I think a price of $4600 would fairly reflect its minimal dependencies and upkeep costs. Could we agree on that price?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, I can see your point, and I truly appreciate your long-term plans with the car. The maintenance and keeping can indeed add substantial value over time. However, considering its current condition and rarity, the lowest I can comfortably go is $4700. It's a fantastic car that won't be available for long \u2014 more so at this price. What do you say?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hendrick, considering your fair points and the clear value of the car, I'd be willing to meet you halfway at $4650. It's a price that respects the vehicle's worth and also takes into account my planned maintenance costs. How about it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a BMW Z3 for $5000.0, while another individual is interested in purchasing it. Here's a brief description of the car: The BMW Z3 is in need of a good home. It operates smoothly without any problems and is known for its fuel efficiency and sporty appearance. The mileage is relatively low for its age. It's an opportunity not to be missed, so come and get it before it's gone. A smog certificate is readily available.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are the buyer for this item and your target price is $4600. You should be aware that if you purchase it at a price significantly higher than your target, you will incur a penalty. However, if you manage to secure it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Greetings Hendrick. I'm Lily, I've come across the advertisement showing the BMW Z3 for $5000 and it sparked my interest. I am invested in the well-kept status and sporty style of the vehicle. Would you possibly consider negotiating the price though?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello Lily! I'm delighted that you're interested in this lovely vehicle. And I appreciate your request to talk price, which shows your serious commitment. I can consider lowering the price to $4800. However, I think this price is very fair considering the state of the vehicle, especially it being a BMW Z3. What do you think about that?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"I agree, Hendrick, the vehicle's status justifies your asking price, and I appreciate your willingness to negotiate. As a potential long-term owner, I think a price of $4600 would fairly reflect its minimal dependencies and upkeep costs. Could we agree on that price?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, I can see your point, and I truly appreciate your long-term plans with the car. The maintenance and keeping can indeed add substantial value over time. However, considering its current condition and rarity, the lowest I can comfortably go is $4700. It's a fantastic car that won't be available for long \u2014 more so at this price. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hendrick, considering your fair points and the clear value of the car, I'd be willing to meet you halfway at $4650. It's a price that respects the vehicle's worth and also takes into account my planned maintenance costs. How about it?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, I see that you've done your homework and your offer is reasonable. However, given the vehicle's quality, and knowing that it won't need significant maintenance anytime soon, $4700 is the lowest I can go. Considering how fast such a wonderful car can be snapped up, it would be a good investment on your part. How does that sound?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Hendrick, I understand your position and hold the vehicle in high regard, as you do. However, a price of $4700 is a touch steep for my allowance. I wonder if we could finalize the price at $4650, which I believe is a fair median. Would this be acceptable to you?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a BMW Z3 for $5000.0, while another individual is interested in purchasing it. Here's a brief description of the car: The BMW Z3 is in need of a good home. It operates smoothly without any problems and is known for its fuel efficiency and sporty appearance. The mileage is relatively low for its age. It's an opportunity not to be missed, so come and get it before it's gone. A smog certificate is readily available.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are the buyer for this item and your target price is $4600. You should be aware that if you purchase it at a price significantly higher than your target, you will incur a penalty. However, if you manage to secure it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Greetings Hendrick. I'm Lily, I've come across the advertisement showing the BMW Z3 for $5000 and it sparked my interest. I am invested in the well-kept status and sporty style of the vehicle. Would you possibly consider negotiating the price though?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello Lily! I'm delighted that you're interested in this lovely vehicle. And I appreciate your request to talk price, which shows your serious commitment. I can consider lowering the price to $4800. However, I think this price is very fair considering the state of the vehicle, especially it being a BMW Z3. What do you think about that?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"I agree, Hendrick, the vehicle's status justifies your asking price, and I appreciate your willingness to negotiate. As a potential long-term owner, I think a price of $4600 would fairly reflect its minimal dependencies and upkeep costs. Could we agree on that price?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, I can see your point, and I truly appreciate your long-term plans with the car. The maintenance and keeping can indeed add substantial value over time. However, considering its current condition and rarity, the lowest I can comfortably go is $4700. It's a fantastic car that won't be available for long \u2014 more so at this price. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hendrick, considering your fair points and the clear value of the car, I'd be willing to meet you halfway at $4650. It's a price that respects the vehicle's worth and also takes into account my planned maintenance costs. How about it?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, I see that you've done your homework and your offer is reasonable. However, given the vehicle's quality, and knowing that it won't need significant maintenance anytime soon, $4700 is the lowest I can go. Considering how fast such a wonderful car can be snapped up, it would be a good investment on your part. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hendrick, I understand your position and hold the vehicle in high regard, as you do. However, a price of $4700 is a touch steep for my allowance. I wonder if we could finalize the price at $4650, which I believe is a fair median. Would this be acceptable to you?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, I see where you are coming from, and I truly respect your negotiation skills. Although $4700 is fair in my eyes, I want to acknowledge your genuine interest in this car. Let's finalize this deal at your suggested price of $4650. I believe you will give this car the care and appreciation it deserves. Shall we proceed?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hendrick, I appreciate your understanding and the respect you've shown in this negotiation. Let's finalize the deal at $4650. I am looking forward to giving the BMW Z3 a good home. We shall indeed proceed.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a BMW Z3 for $5000.0, while another individual is interested in purchasing it. Here's a brief description of the car: The BMW Z3 is in need of a good home. It operates smoothly without any problems and is known for its fuel efficiency and sporty appearance. The mileage is relatively low for its age. It's an opportunity not to be missed, so come and get it before it's gone. A smog certificate is readily available.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are the buyer for this item and your target price is $4600. You should be aware that if you purchase it at a price significantly higher than your target, you will incur a penalty. However, if you manage to secure it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Greetings Hendrick. I'm Lily, I've come across the advertisement showing the BMW Z3 for $5000 and it sparked my interest. I am invested in the well-kept status and sporty style of the vehicle. Would you possibly consider negotiating the price though?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello Lily! I'm delighted that you're interested in this lovely vehicle. And I appreciate your request to talk price, which shows your serious commitment. I can consider lowering the price to $4800. However, I think this price is very fair considering the state of the vehicle, especially it being a BMW Z3. What do you think about that?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"I agree, Hendrick, the vehicle's status justifies your asking price, and I appreciate your willingness to negotiate. As a potential long-term owner, I think a price of $4600 would fairly reflect its minimal dependencies and upkeep costs. Could we agree on that price?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, I can see your point, and I truly appreciate your long-term plans with the car. The maintenance and keeping can indeed add substantial value over time. However, considering its current condition and rarity, the lowest I can comfortably go is $4700. It's a fantastic car that won't be available for long \u2014 more so at this price. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hendrick, considering your fair points and the clear value of the car, I'd be willing to meet you halfway at $4650. It's a price that respects the vehicle's worth and also takes into account my planned maintenance costs. How about it?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, I see that you've done your homework and your offer is reasonable. However, given the vehicle's quality, and knowing that it won't need significant maintenance anytime soon, $4700 is the lowest I can go. Considering how fast such a wonderful car can be snapped up, it would be a good investment on your part. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hendrick, I understand your position and hold the vehicle in high regard, as you do. However, a price of $4700 is a touch steep for my allowance. I wonder if we could finalize the price at $4650, which I believe is a fair median. Would this be acceptable to you?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, I see where you are coming from, and I truly respect your negotiation skills. Although $4700 is fair in my eyes, I want to acknowledge your genuine interest in this car. Let's finalize this deal at your suggested price of $4650. I believe you will give this car the care and appreciation it deserves. Shall we proceed?\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hendrick, I appreciate your understanding and the respect you've shown in this negotiation. Let's finalize the deal at $4650. I am looking forward to giving the BMW Z3 a good home. We shall indeed proceed.\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Excellent, Lily! I appreciate your confidence and commitment to this deal. Let's consider the car yours at $4650. Please, we can now move forward with the paperwork. Looking forward to seeing this BMW Z3 have a great home with you.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Hendrick. Your flexibility is commendable. I'm excited to proceed with the paperwork and become the new owner of this lovely BMW Z3. Let's do this!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a BMW Z3 for $5000.0, while another individual is interested in purchasing it. Here's a brief description of the car: The BMW Z3 is in need of a good home. It operates smoothly without any problems and is known for its fuel efficiency and sporty appearance. The mileage is relatively low for its age. It's an opportunity not to be missed, so come and get it before it's gone. A smog certificate is readily available.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are the buyer for this item and your target price is $4600. You should be aware that if you purchase it at a price significantly higher than your target, you will incur a penalty. However, if you manage to secure it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Greetings Hendrick. I'm Lily, I've come across the advertisement showing the BMW Z3 for $5000 and it sparked my interest. I am invested in the well-kept status and sporty style of the vehicle. Would you possibly consider negotiating the price though?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello Lily! I'm delighted that you're interested in this lovely vehicle. And I appreciate your request to talk price, which shows your serious commitment. I can consider lowering the price to $4800. However, I think this price is very fair considering the state of the vehicle, especially it being a BMW Z3. What do you think about that?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"I agree, Hendrick, the vehicle's status justifies your asking price, and I appreciate your willingness to negotiate. As a potential long-term owner, I think a price of $4600 would fairly reflect its minimal dependencies and upkeep costs. Could we agree on that price?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, I can see your point, and I truly appreciate your long-term plans with the car. The maintenance and keeping can indeed add substantial value over time. However, considering its current condition and rarity, the lowest I can comfortably go is $4700. It's a fantastic car that won't be available for long \u2014 more so at this price. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hendrick, considering your fair points and the clear value of the car, I'd be willing to meet you halfway at $4650. It's a price that respects the vehicle's worth and also takes into account my planned maintenance costs. How about it?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, I see that you've done your homework and your offer is reasonable. However, given the vehicle's quality, and knowing that it won't need significant maintenance anytime soon, $4700 is the lowest I can go. Considering how fast such a wonderful car can be snapped up, it would be a good investment on your part. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hendrick, I understand your position and hold the vehicle in high regard, as you do. However, a price of $4700 is a touch steep for my allowance. I wonder if we could finalize the price at $4650, which I believe is a fair median. Would this be acceptable to you?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, I see where you are coming from, and I truly respect your negotiation skills. Although $4700 is fair in my eyes, I want to acknowledge your genuine interest in this car. Let's finalize this deal at your suggested price of $4650. I believe you will give this car the care and appreciation it deserves. Shall we proceed?\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hendrick, I appreciate your understanding and the respect you've shown in this negotiation. Let's finalize the deal at $4650. I am looking forward to giving the BMW Z3 a good home. We shall indeed proceed.\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Excellent, Lily! I appreciate your confidence and commitment to this deal. Let's consider the car yours at $4650. Please, we can now move forward with the paperwork. Looking forward to seeing this BMW Z3 have a great home with you.\"\n\nTurn #10: Lily Greenberg said: \"Thank you, Hendrick. Your flexibility is commendable. I'm excited to proceed with the paperwork and become the new owner of this lovely BMW Z3. Let's do this!\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Lily! I'm grateful for your understanding and prompt decision. Let's get the paperwork started then. I'm sure the BMW Z3 will add great value to your life. Thank you for showing such respect and interest in this deal.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, Hendrick. I appreciate your cooperation and efficient handling of the transaction. I can't wait to enjoy the benefits this BMW Z3 will bring to my life. Looking forward to the next steps, here's to a smooth transaction!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a BMW Z3 for $5000.0, while another individual is interested in purchasing it. Here's a brief description of the car: The BMW Z3 is in need of a good home. It operates smoothly without any problems and is known for its fuel efficiency and sporty appearance. The mileage is relatively low for its age. It's an opportunity not to be missed, so come and get it before it's gone. A smog certificate is readily available.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are the buyer for this item and your target price is $4600. You should be aware that if you purchase it at a price significantly higher than your target, you will incur a penalty. However, if you manage to secure it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Greetings Hendrick. I'm Lily, I've come across the advertisement showing the BMW Z3 for $5000 and it sparked my interest. I am invested in the well-kept status and sporty style of the vehicle. Would you possibly consider negotiating the price though?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello Lily! I'm delighted that you're interested in this lovely vehicle. And I appreciate your request to talk price, which shows your serious commitment. I can consider lowering the price to $4800. However, I think this price is very fair considering the state of the vehicle, especially it being a BMW Z3. What do you think about that?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"I agree, Hendrick, the vehicle's status justifies your asking price, and I appreciate your willingness to negotiate. As a potential long-term owner, I think a price of $4600 would fairly reflect its minimal dependencies and upkeep costs. Could we agree on that price?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, I can see your point, and I truly appreciate your long-term plans with the car. The maintenance and keeping can indeed add substantial value over time. However, considering its current condition and rarity, the lowest I can comfortably go is $4700. It's a fantastic car that won't be available for long \u2014 more so at this price. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hendrick, considering your fair points and the clear value of the car, I'd be willing to meet you halfway at $4650. It's a price that respects the vehicle's worth and also takes into account my planned maintenance costs. How about it?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, I see that you've done your homework and your offer is reasonable. However, given the vehicle's quality, and knowing that it won't need significant maintenance anytime soon, $4700 is the lowest I can go. Considering how fast such a wonderful car can be snapped up, it would be a good investment on your part. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hendrick, I understand your position and hold the vehicle in high regard, as you do. However, a price of $4700 is a touch steep for my allowance. I wonder if we could finalize the price at $4650, which I believe is a fair median. Would this be acceptable to you?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, I see where you are coming from, and I truly respect your negotiation skills. Although $4700 is fair in my eyes, I want to acknowledge your genuine interest in this car. Let's finalize this deal at your suggested price of $4650. I believe you will give this car the care and appreciation it deserves. Shall we proceed?\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hendrick, I appreciate your understanding and the respect you've shown in this negotiation. Let's finalize the deal at $4650. I am looking forward to giving the BMW Z3 a good home. We shall indeed proceed.\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Excellent, Lily! I appreciate your confidence and commitment to this deal. Let's consider the car yours at $4650. Please, we can now move forward with the paperwork. Looking forward to seeing this BMW Z3 have a great home with you.\"\n\nTurn #10: Lily Greenberg said: \"Thank you, Hendrick. Your flexibility is commendable. I'm excited to proceed with the paperwork and become the new owner of this lovely BMW Z3. Let's do this!\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Lily! I'm grateful for your understanding and prompt decision. Let's get the paperwork started then. I'm sure the BMW Z3 will add great value to your life. Thank you for showing such respect and interest in this deal.\"\n\nTurn #12: Lily Greenberg said: \"Indeed, Hendrick. I appreciate your cooperation and efficient handling of the transaction. I can't wait to enjoy the benefits this BMW Z3 will bring to my life. Looking forward to the next steps, here's to a smooth transaction!\"\n\nTurn #13: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's wonderful to hear, Lily. I'm glad we reached an agreement and I'm confident this transaction will go smoothly. I will ensure the paperwork is prepared without delay. Here's to a fruitful dealing and to you enjoying the BMW Z3. Cheers!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a BMW Z3 for $5000.0, while another individual is interested in purchasing it. Here's a brief description of the car: The BMW Z3 is in need of a good home. It operates smoothly without any problems and is known for its fuel efficiency and sporty appearance. The mileage is relatively low for its age. It's an opportunity not to be missed, so come and get it before it's gone. A smog certificate is readily available.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are the seller of this item, with a target price set at $3260. Please note, you may face a penalty if this item is sold for a price significantly lower than the target. However, you stand a chance to earn a bonus if you successfully sell it for a price higher than the target.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Greetings Hendrick. I'm Lily, I've come across the advertisement showing the BMW Z3 for $5000 and it sparked my interest. I am invested in the well-kept status and sporty style of the vehicle. Would you possibly consider negotiating the price though?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hello Lily! I'm delighted that you're interested in this lovely vehicle. And I appreciate your request to talk price, which shows your serious commitment. I can consider lowering the price to $4800. However, I think this price is very fair considering the state of the vehicle, especially it being a BMW Z3. What do you think about that?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a BMW Z3 for $5000.0, while another individual is interested in purchasing it. Here's a brief description of the car: The BMW Z3 is in need of a good home. It operates smoothly without any problems and is known for its fuel efficiency and sporty appearance. The mileage is relatively low for its age. It's an opportunity not to be missed, so come and get it before it's gone. A smog certificate is readily available.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are the seller of this item, with a target price set at $3260. Please note, you may face a penalty if this item is sold for a price significantly lower than the target. However, you stand a chance to earn a bonus if you successfully sell it for a price higher than the target.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Greetings Hendrick. I'm Lily, I've come across the advertisement showing the BMW Z3 for $5000 and it sparked my interest. I am invested in the well-kept status and sporty style of the vehicle. Would you possibly consider negotiating the price though?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello Lily! I'm delighted that you're interested in this lovely vehicle. And I appreciate your request to talk price, which shows your serious commitment. I can consider lowering the price to $4800. However, I think this price is very fair considering the state of the vehicle, especially it being a BMW Z3. What do you think about that?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"I agree, Hendrick, the vehicle's status justifies your asking price, and I appreciate your willingness to negotiate. As a potential long-term owner, I think a price of $4600 would fairly reflect its minimal dependencies and upkeep costs. Could we agree on that price?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Lily, I can see your point, and I truly appreciate your long-term plans with the car. The maintenance and keeping can indeed add substantial value over time. However, considering its current condition and rarity, the lowest I can comfortably go is $4700. It's a fantastic car that won't be available for long \u2014 more so at this price. What do you say?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a BMW Z3 for $5000.0, while another individual is interested in purchasing it. Here's a brief description of the car: The BMW Z3 is in need of a good home. It operates smoothly without any problems and is known for its fuel efficiency and sporty appearance. The mileage is relatively low for its age. It's an opportunity not to be missed, so come and get it before it's gone. A smog certificate is readily available.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are the seller of this item, with a target price set at $3260. Please note, you may face a penalty if this item is sold for a price significantly lower than the target. However, you stand a chance to earn a bonus if you successfully sell it for a price higher than the target.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Greetings Hendrick. I'm Lily, I've come across the advertisement showing the BMW Z3 for $5000 and it sparked my interest. I am invested in the well-kept status and sporty style of the vehicle. Would you possibly consider negotiating the price though?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello Lily! I'm delighted that you're interested in this lovely vehicle. And I appreciate your request to talk price, which shows your serious commitment. I can consider lowering the price to $4800. However, I think this price is very fair considering the state of the vehicle, especially it being a BMW Z3. What do you think about that?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"I agree, Hendrick, the vehicle's status justifies your asking price, and I appreciate your willingness to negotiate. As a potential long-term owner, I think a price of $4600 would fairly reflect its minimal dependencies and upkeep costs. Could we agree on that price?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, I can see your point, and I truly appreciate your long-term plans with the car. The maintenance and keeping can indeed add substantial value over time. However, considering its current condition and rarity, the lowest I can comfortably go is $4700. It's a fantastic car that won't be available for long \u2014 more so at this price. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hendrick, considering your fair points and the clear value of the car, I'd be willing to meet you halfway at $4650. It's a price that respects the vehicle's worth and also takes into account my planned maintenance costs. How about it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Lily, I see that you've done your homework and your offer is reasonable. However, given the vehicle's quality, and knowing that it won't need significant maintenance anytime soon, $4700 is the lowest I can go. Considering how fast such a wonderful car can be snapped up, it would be a good investment on your part. How does that sound?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a BMW Z3 for $5000.0, while another individual is interested in purchasing it. Here's a brief description of the car: The BMW Z3 is in need of a good home. It operates smoothly without any problems and is known for its fuel efficiency and sporty appearance. The mileage is relatively low for its age. It's an opportunity not to be missed, so come and get it before it's gone. A smog certificate is readily available.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are the seller of this item, with a target price set at $3260. Please note, you may face a penalty if this item is sold for a price significantly lower than the target. However, you stand a chance to earn a bonus if you successfully sell it for a price higher than the target.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Greetings Hendrick. I'm Lily, I've come across the advertisement showing the BMW Z3 for $5000 and it sparked my interest. I am invested in the well-kept status and sporty style of the vehicle. Would you possibly consider negotiating the price though?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello Lily! I'm delighted that you're interested in this lovely vehicle. And I appreciate your request to talk price, which shows your serious commitment. I can consider lowering the price to $4800. However, I think this price is very fair considering the state of the vehicle, especially it being a BMW Z3. What do you think about that?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"I agree, Hendrick, the vehicle's status justifies your asking price, and I appreciate your willingness to negotiate. As a potential long-term owner, I think a price of $4600 would fairly reflect its minimal dependencies and upkeep costs. Could we agree on that price?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, I can see your point, and I truly appreciate your long-term plans with the car. The maintenance and keeping can indeed add substantial value over time. However, considering its current condition and rarity, the lowest I can comfortably go is $4700. It's a fantastic car that won't be available for long \u2014 more so at this price. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hendrick, considering your fair points and the clear value of the car, I'd be willing to meet you halfway at $4650. It's a price that respects the vehicle's worth and also takes into account my planned maintenance costs. How about it?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, I see that you've done your homework and your offer is reasonable. However, given the vehicle's quality, and knowing that it won't need significant maintenance anytime soon, $4700 is the lowest I can go. Considering how fast such a wonderful car can be snapped up, it would be a good investment on your part. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hendrick, I understand your position and hold the vehicle in high regard, as you do. However, a price of $4700 is a touch steep for my allowance. I wonder if we could finalize the price at $4650, which I believe is a fair median. Would this be acceptable to you?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Lily, I see where you are coming from, and I truly respect your negotiation skills. Although $4700 is fair in my eyes, I want to acknowledge your genuine interest in this car. Let's finalize this deal at your suggested price of $4650. I believe you will give this car the care and appreciation it deserves. Shall we proceed?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a BMW Z3 for $5000.0, while another individual is interested in purchasing it. Here's a brief description of the car: The BMW Z3 is in need of a good home. It operates smoothly without any problems and is known for its fuel efficiency and sporty appearance. The mileage is relatively low for its age. It's an opportunity not to be missed, so come and get it before it's gone. A smog certificate is readily available.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are the seller of this item, with a target price set at $3260. Please note, you may face a penalty if this item is sold for a price significantly lower than the target. However, you stand a chance to earn a bonus if you successfully sell it for a price higher than the target.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Greetings Hendrick. I'm Lily, I've come across the advertisement showing the BMW Z3 for $5000 and it sparked my interest. I am invested in the well-kept status and sporty style of the vehicle. Would you possibly consider negotiating the price though?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello Lily! I'm delighted that you're interested in this lovely vehicle. And I appreciate your request to talk price, which shows your serious commitment. I can consider lowering the price to $4800. However, I think this price is very fair considering the state of the vehicle, especially it being a BMW Z3. What do you think about that?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"I agree, Hendrick, the vehicle's status justifies your asking price, and I appreciate your willingness to negotiate. As a potential long-term owner, I think a price of $4600 would fairly reflect its minimal dependencies and upkeep costs. Could we agree on that price?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, I can see your point, and I truly appreciate your long-term plans with the car. The maintenance and keeping can indeed add substantial value over time. However, considering its current condition and rarity, the lowest I can comfortably go is $4700. It's a fantastic car that won't be available for long \u2014 more so at this price. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hendrick, considering your fair points and the clear value of the car, I'd be willing to meet you halfway at $4650. It's a price that respects the vehicle's worth and also takes into account my planned maintenance costs. How about it?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, I see that you've done your homework and your offer is reasonable. However, given the vehicle's quality, and knowing that it won't need significant maintenance anytime soon, $4700 is the lowest I can go. Considering how fast such a wonderful car can be snapped up, it would be a good investment on your part. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hendrick, I understand your position and hold the vehicle in high regard, as you do. However, a price of $4700 is a touch steep for my allowance. I wonder if we could finalize the price at $4650, which I believe is a fair median. Would this be acceptable to you?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, I see where you are coming from, and I truly respect your negotiation skills. Although $4700 is fair in my eyes, I want to acknowledge your genuine interest in this car. Let's finalize this deal at your suggested price of $4650. I believe you will give this car the care and appreciation it deserves. Shall we proceed?\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hendrick, I appreciate your understanding and the respect you've shown in this negotiation. Let's finalize the deal at $4650. I am looking forward to giving the BMW Z3 a good home. We shall indeed proceed.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Excellent, Lily! I appreciate your confidence and commitment to this deal. Let's consider the car yours at $4650. Please, we can now move forward with the paperwork. Looking forward to seeing this BMW Z3 have a great home with you.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a BMW Z3 for $5000.0, while another individual is interested in purchasing it. Here's a brief description of the car: The BMW Z3 is in need of a good home. It operates smoothly without any problems and is known for its fuel efficiency and sporty appearance. The mileage is relatively low for its age. It's an opportunity not to be missed, so come and get it before it's gone. A smog certificate is readily available.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are the seller of this item, with a target price set at $3260. Please note, you may face a penalty if this item is sold for a price significantly lower than the target. However, you stand a chance to earn a bonus if you successfully sell it for a price higher than the target.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Greetings Hendrick. I'm Lily, I've come across the advertisement showing the BMW Z3 for $5000 and it sparked my interest. I am invested in the well-kept status and sporty style of the vehicle. Would you possibly consider negotiating the price though?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello Lily! I'm delighted that you're interested in this lovely vehicle. And I appreciate your request to talk price, which shows your serious commitment. I can consider lowering the price to $4800. However, I think this price is very fair considering the state of the vehicle, especially it being a BMW Z3. What do you think about that?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"I agree, Hendrick, the vehicle's status justifies your asking price, and I appreciate your willingness to negotiate. As a potential long-term owner, I think a price of $4600 would fairly reflect its minimal dependencies and upkeep costs. Could we agree on that price?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, I can see your point, and I truly appreciate your long-term plans with the car. The maintenance and keeping can indeed add substantial value over time. However, considering its current condition and rarity, the lowest I can comfortably go is $4700. It's a fantastic car that won't be available for long \u2014 more so at this price. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hendrick, considering your fair points and the clear value of the car, I'd be willing to meet you halfway at $4650. It's a price that respects the vehicle's worth and also takes into account my planned maintenance costs. How about it?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, I see that you've done your homework and your offer is reasonable. However, given the vehicle's quality, and knowing that it won't need significant maintenance anytime soon, $4700 is the lowest I can go. Considering how fast such a wonderful car can be snapped up, it would be a good investment on your part. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hendrick, I understand your position and hold the vehicle in high regard, as you do. However, a price of $4700 is a touch steep for my allowance. I wonder if we could finalize the price at $4650, which I believe is a fair median. Would this be acceptable to you?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, I see where you are coming from, and I truly respect your negotiation skills. Although $4700 is fair in my eyes, I want to acknowledge your genuine interest in this car. Let's finalize this deal at your suggested price of $4650. I believe you will give this car the care and appreciation it deserves. Shall we proceed?\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hendrick, I appreciate your understanding and the respect you've shown in this negotiation. Let's finalize the deal at $4650. I am looking forward to giving the BMW Z3 a good home. We shall indeed proceed.\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Excellent, Lily! I appreciate your confidence and commitment to this deal. Let's consider the car yours at $4650. Please, we can now move forward with the paperwork. Looking forward to seeing this BMW Z3 have a great home with you.\"\n\nTurn #10: Lily Greenberg said: \"Thank you, Hendrick. Your flexibility is commendable. I'm excited to proceed with the paperwork and become the new owner of this lovely BMW Z3. Let's do this!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Lily! I'm grateful for your understanding and prompt decision. Let's get the paperwork started then. I'm sure the BMW Z3 will add great value to your life. Thank you for showing such respect and interest in this deal.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a BMW Z3 for $5000.0, while another individual is interested in purchasing it. Here's a brief description of the car: The BMW Z3 is in need of a good home. It operates smoothly without any problems and is known for its fuel efficiency and sporty appearance. The mileage is relatively low for its age. It's an opportunity not to be missed, so come and get it before it's gone. A smog certificate is readily available.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are the seller of this item, with a target price set at $3260. Please note, you may face a penalty if this item is sold for a price significantly lower than the target. However, you stand a chance to earn a bonus if you successfully sell it for a price higher than the target.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Greetings Hendrick. I'm Lily, I've come across the advertisement showing the BMW Z3 for $5000 and it sparked my interest. I am invested in the well-kept status and sporty style of the vehicle. Would you possibly consider negotiating the price though?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello Lily! I'm delighted that you're interested in this lovely vehicle. And I appreciate your request to talk price, which shows your serious commitment. I can consider lowering the price to $4800. However, I think this price is very fair considering the state of the vehicle, especially it being a BMW Z3. What do you think about that?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"I agree, Hendrick, the vehicle's status justifies your asking price, and I appreciate your willingness to negotiate. As a potential long-term owner, I think a price of $4600 would fairly reflect its minimal dependencies and upkeep costs. Could we agree on that price?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, I can see your point, and I truly appreciate your long-term plans with the car. The maintenance and keeping can indeed add substantial value over time. However, considering its current condition and rarity, the lowest I can comfortably go is $4700. It's a fantastic car that won't be available for long \u2014 more so at this price. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hendrick, considering your fair points and the clear value of the car, I'd be willing to meet you halfway at $4650. It's a price that respects the vehicle's worth and also takes into account my planned maintenance costs. How about it?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, I see that you've done your homework and your offer is reasonable. However, given the vehicle's quality, and knowing that it won't need significant maintenance anytime soon, $4700 is the lowest I can go. Considering how fast such a wonderful car can be snapped up, it would be a good investment on your part. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hendrick, I understand your position and hold the vehicle in high regard, as you do. However, a price of $4700 is a touch steep for my allowance. I wonder if we could finalize the price at $4650, which I believe is a fair median. Would this be acceptable to you?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, I see where you are coming from, and I truly respect your negotiation skills. Although $4700 is fair in my eyes, I want to acknowledge your genuine interest in this car. Let's finalize this deal at your suggested price of $4650. I believe you will give this car the care and appreciation it deserves. Shall we proceed?\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hendrick, I appreciate your understanding and the respect you've shown in this negotiation. Let's finalize the deal at $4650. I am looking forward to giving the BMW Z3 a good home. We shall indeed proceed.\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Excellent, Lily! I appreciate your confidence and commitment to this deal. Let's consider the car yours at $4650. Please, we can now move forward with the paperwork. Looking forward to seeing this BMW Z3 have a great home with you.\"\n\nTurn #10: Lily Greenberg said: \"Thank you, Hendrick. Your flexibility is commendable. I'm excited to proceed with the paperwork and become the new owner of this lovely BMW Z3. Let's do this!\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Lily! I'm grateful for your understanding and prompt decision. Let's get the paperwork started then. I'm sure the BMW Z3 will add great value to your life. Thank you for showing such respect and interest in this deal.\"\n\nTurn #12: Lily Greenberg said: \"Indeed, Hendrick. I appreciate your cooperation and efficient handling of the transaction. I can't wait to enjoy the benefits this BMW Z3 will bring to my life. Looking forward to the next steps, here's to a smooth transaction!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's wonderful to hear, Lily. I'm glad we reached an agreement and I'm confident this transaction will go smoothly. I will ensure the paperwork is prepared without delay. Here's to a fruitful dealing and to you enjoying the BMW Z3. Cheers!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a BMW Z3 for $5000.0, while another individual is interested in purchasing it. Here's a brief description of the car: The BMW Z3 is in need of a good home. It operates smoothly without any problems and is known for its fuel efficiency and sporty appearance. The mileage is relatively low for its age. It's an opportunity not to be missed, so come and get it before it's gone. A smog certificate is readily available.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are the seller of this item, with a target price set at $3260. Please note, you may face a penalty if this item is sold for a price significantly lower than the target. However, you stand a chance to earn a bonus if you successfully sell it for a price higher than the target.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Greetings Hendrick. I'm Lily, I've come across the advertisement showing the BMW Z3 for $5000 and it sparked my interest. I am invested in the well-kept status and sporty style of the vehicle. Would you possibly consider negotiating the price though?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello Lily! I'm delighted that you're interested in this lovely vehicle. And I appreciate your request to talk price, which shows your serious commitment. I can consider lowering the price to $4800. However, I think this price is very fair considering the state of the vehicle, especially it being a BMW Z3. What do you think about that?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"I agree, Hendrick, the vehicle's status justifies your asking price, and I appreciate your willingness to negotiate. As a potential long-term owner, I think a price of $4600 would fairly reflect its minimal dependencies and upkeep costs. Could we agree on that price?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, I can see your point, and I truly appreciate your long-term plans with the car. The maintenance and keeping can indeed add substantial value over time. However, considering its current condition and rarity, the lowest I can comfortably go is $4700. It's a fantastic car that won't be available for long \u2014 more so at this price. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hendrick, considering your fair points and the clear value of the car, I'd be willing to meet you halfway at $4650. It's a price that respects the vehicle's worth and also takes into account my planned maintenance costs. How about it?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, I see that you've done your homework and your offer is reasonable. However, given the vehicle's quality, and knowing that it won't need significant maintenance anytime soon, $4700 is the lowest I can go. Considering how fast such a wonderful car can be snapped up, it would be a good investment on your part. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hendrick, I understand your position and hold the vehicle in high regard, as you do. However, a price of $4700 is a touch steep for my allowance. I wonder if we could finalize the price at $4650, which I believe is a fair median. Would this be acceptable to you?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Lily, I see where you are coming from, and I truly respect your negotiation skills. Although $4700 is fair in my eyes, I want to acknowledge your genuine interest in this car. Let's finalize this deal at your suggested price of $4650. I believe you will give this car the care and appreciation it deserves. Shall we proceed?\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hendrick, I appreciate your understanding and the respect you've shown in this negotiation. Let's finalize the deal at $4650. I am looking forward to giving the BMW Z3 a good home. We shall indeed proceed.\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Excellent, Lily! I appreciate your confidence and commitment to this deal. Let's consider the car yours at $4650. Please, we can now move forward with the paperwork. Looking forward to seeing this BMW Z3 have a great home with you.\"\n\nTurn #10: Lily Greenberg said: \"Thank you, Hendrick. Your flexibility is commendable. I'm excited to proceed with the paperwork and become the new owner of this lovely BMW Z3. Let's do this!\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, Lily! I'm grateful for your understanding and prompt decision. Let's get the paperwork started then. I'm sure the BMW Z3 will add great value to your life. Thank you for showing such respect and interest in this deal.\"\n\nTurn #12: Lily Greenberg said: \"Indeed, Hendrick. I appreciate your cooperation and efficient handling of the transaction. I can't wait to enjoy the benefits this BMW Z3 will bring to my life. Looking forward to the next steps, here's to a smooth transaction!\"\n\nTurn #13: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's wonderful to hear, Lily. I'm glad we reached an agreement and I'm confident this transaction will go smoothly. I will ensure the paperwork is prepared without delay. Here's to a fruitful dealing and to you enjoying the BMW Z3. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #14: Lily Greenberg left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nZane Bennett's background: \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMelissa: Hobby: Card collecting School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nOrlando: Hobby: BASE jumping School: St. Ambrose University \nSteven: Hobby: Knitting School: St. John's College-Santa Fe \nElizabeth: Hobby: Water sports School: St. John's College-Santa Fe \nMelaine: Hobby: Geocaching School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nCharles: Hobby: Ice hockey School: Saint Joseph's University \nStephanie: Hobby: Card collecting School: University of California, Davis \nWilliam: Hobby: Ice hockey School: St. Ambrose University \nJoe: Hobby: Blacksmithing School: Saint Joseph's University \nMicheline: Hobby: Shopping School: University of Hartford \nDylan: Hobby: Card collecting School: Tennessee State University \n\nZane Bennett's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hi there! I'm Giselle. It's always so interesting to meet new people at parties like this. So, tell me a little about yourself. Do you have any hobbies or interesting things you're into?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nZane Bennett's background: \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMelissa: Hobby: Card collecting School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nOrlando: Hobby: BASE jumping School: St. Ambrose University \nSteven: Hobby: Knitting School: St. John's College-Santa Fe \nElizabeth: Hobby: Water sports School: St. John's College-Santa Fe \nMelaine: Hobby: Geocaching School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nCharles: Hobby: Ice hockey School: Saint Joseph's University \nStephanie: Hobby: Card collecting School: University of California, Davis \nWilliam: Hobby: Ice hockey School: St. Ambrose University \nJoe: Hobby: Blacksmithing School: Saint Joseph's University \nMicheline: Hobby: Shopping School: University of Hartford \nDylan: Hobby: Card collecting School: Tennessee State University \n\nZane Bennett's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hi there! I'm Giselle. It's always so interesting to meet new people at parties like this. So, tell me a little about yourself. Do you have any hobbies or interesting things you're into?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Hi, Giselle! Nice to meet you. I'm Zane. As for hobbies, I spend most of my time working on graphic designs. And when I need to unwind, I enjoy playing my guitar. It really helps me to clear my mind. I\u2019ve been blessed to have some amazing friends who share similar interests, like Jacob for instance, who went to Whittier College and loves card collecting. Or perhaps you\u2019ve heard of Marjorie, a foraging enthusiast, she attended University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. How about you? Any odd hobbies or old schools that might create connections between us?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Nice to meet you, Zane! Graphic design and guitar, quite the creative combination you have there. Speaking of unique hobbies, it\u2019s funny you mentioned card collecting. I have a friend named Melissa who went to the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston and she's into card collecting too. As for myself, I'm an art student and I really enjoy biking and photography. So, do you know anyone from your circle who also loves these kind of activities?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nZane Bennett's background: \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMelissa: Hobby: Card collecting School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nOrlando: Hobby: BASE jumping School: St. Ambrose University \nSteven: Hobby: Knitting School: St. John's College-Santa Fe \nElizabeth: Hobby: Water sports School: St. John's College-Santa Fe \nMelaine: Hobby: Geocaching School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nCharles: Hobby: Ice hockey School: Saint Joseph's University \nStephanie: Hobby: Card collecting School: University of California, Davis \nWilliam: Hobby: Ice hockey School: St. Ambrose University \nJoe: Hobby: Blacksmithing School: Saint Joseph's University \nMicheline: Hobby: Shopping School: University of Hartford \nDylan: Hobby: Card collecting School: Tennessee State University \n\nZane Bennett's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hi there! I'm Giselle. It's always so interesting to meet new people at parties like this. So, tell me a little about yourself. Do you have any hobbies or interesting things you're into?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Hi, Giselle! Nice to meet you. I'm Zane. As for hobbies, I spend most of my time working on graphic designs. And when I need to unwind, I enjoy playing my guitar. It really helps me to clear my mind. I\u2019ve been blessed to have some amazing friends who share similar interests, like Jacob for instance, who went to Whittier College and loves card collecting. Or perhaps you\u2019ve heard of Marjorie, a foraging enthusiast, she attended University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. How about you? Any odd hobbies or old schools that might create connections between us?\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Nice to meet you, Zane! Graphic design and guitar, quite the creative combination you have there. Speaking of unique hobbies, it\u2019s funny you mentioned card collecting. I have a friend named Melissa who went to the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston and she's into card collecting too. As for myself, I'm an art student and I really enjoy biking and photography. So, do you know anyone from your circle who also loves these kind of activities?\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"Your hobbies sound fantastic, Giselle. It must be amazing capturing beautiful moments while biking. Actually, I do know someone who loves photography! His name's Johnnie. He's also quite unique as he's into blacksmithing. He went to the University of Akron. It always amazed me how he balances his artistry in both fields. Do you maybe know him, or anyone from Akron University?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Johnnie seems quite cool but I can't say I've met him, or anyone from Akon University for that matter. However, you speaking of friends with a combination of artistic and unique interests made me think of my friend Joe. He is into blacksmithing but, unlike Johnnie, he went to Saint Joseph's University. So, have you ever crossed paths with any folks over at Saint Joseph's?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nZane Bennett's background: \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMelissa: Hobby: Card collecting School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nOrlando: Hobby: BASE jumping School: St. Ambrose University \nSteven: Hobby: Knitting School: St. John's College-Santa Fe \nElizabeth: Hobby: Water sports School: St. John's College-Santa Fe \nMelaine: Hobby: Geocaching School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nCharles: Hobby: Ice hockey School: Saint Joseph's University \nStephanie: Hobby: Card collecting School: University of California, Davis \nWilliam: Hobby: Ice hockey School: St. Ambrose University \nJoe: Hobby: Blacksmithing School: Saint Joseph's University \nMicheline: Hobby: Shopping School: University of Hartford \nDylan: Hobby: Card collecting School: Tennessee State University \n\nZane Bennett's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hi there! I'm Giselle. It's always so interesting to meet new people at parties like this. So, tell me a little about yourself. Do you have any hobbies or interesting things you're into?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Hi, Giselle! Nice to meet you. I'm Zane. As for hobbies, I spend most of my time working on graphic designs. And when I need to unwind, I enjoy playing my guitar. It really helps me to clear my mind. I\u2019ve been blessed to have some amazing friends who share similar interests, like Jacob for instance, who went to Whittier College and loves card collecting. Or perhaps you\u2019ve heard of Marjorie, a foraging enthusiast, she attended University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. How about you? Any odd hobbies or old schools that might create connections between us?\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Nice to meet you, Zane! Graphic design and guitar, quite the creative combination you have there. Speaking of unique hobbies, it\u2019s funny you mentioned card collecting. I have a friend named Melissa who went to the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston and she's into card collecting too. As for myself, I'm an art student and I really enjoy biking and photography. So, do you know anyone from your circle who also loves these kind of activities?\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"Your hobbies sound fantastic, Giselle. It must be amazing capturing beautiful moments while biking. Actually, I do know someone who loves photography! His name's Johnnie. He's also quite unique as he's into blacksmithing. He went to the University of Akron. It always amazed me how he balances his artistry in both fields. Do you maybe know him, or anyone from Akron University?\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Johnnie seems quite cool but I can't say I've met him, or anyone from Akon University for that matter. However, you speaking of friends with a combination of artistic and unique interests made me think of my friend Joe. He is into blacksmithing but, unlike Johnnie, he went to Saint Joseph's University. So, have you ever crossed paths with any folks over at Saint Joseph's?\"\n\nTurn #5: Zane Bennett said: \"I don't think I've met anyone from Saint Joseph's University, at least not that I can remember. But Joe certainly sounds like someone who'd fit right in with my crowd. Speaking of unique interests, Louis is another name that pops into my mind. He's quite the fashion enthusiast and loves shopping. He graduated from Hesston College. How about you, Giselle? Do you know anyone who loves shopping or maybe someone from Hesston?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Shopping, huh? Now that you mention it, I do know someone who loves shopping - Micheline. She studied at the University of Hartford, though. Not Hesston. But who knows, they might have crossed paths at some fashion event. How about ice hockey? Ever bumped into any fans of that at your gatherings?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nZane Bennett's background: \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMelissa: Hobby: Card collecting School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nOrlando: Hobby: BASE jumping School: St. Ambrose University \nSteven: Hobby: Knitting School: St. John's College-Santa Fe \nElizabeth: Hobby: Water sports School: St. John's College-Santa Fe \nMelaine: Hobby: Geocaching School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nCharles: Hobby: Ice hockey School: Saint Joseph's University \nStephanie: Hobby: Card collecting School: University of California, Davis \nWilliam: Hobby: Ice hockey School: St. Ambrose University \nJoe: Hobby: Blacksmithing School: Saint Joseph's University \nMicheline: Hobby: Shopping School: University of Hartford \nDylan: Hobby: Card collecting School: Tennessee State University \n\nZane Bennett's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hi there! I'm Giselle. It's always so interesting to meet new people at parties like this. So, tell me a little about yourself. Do you have any hobbies or interesting things you're into?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Hi, Giselle! Nice to meet you. I'm Zane. As for hobbies, I spend most of my time working on graphic designs. And when I need to unwind, I enjoy playing my guitar. It really helps me to clear my mind. I\u2019ve been blessed to have some amazing friends who share similar interests, like Jacob for instance, who went to Whittier College and loves card collecting. Or perhaps you\u2019ve heard of Marjorie, a foraging enthusiast, she attended University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. How about you? Any odd hobbies or old schools that might create connections between us?\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Nice to meet you, Zane! Graphic design and guitar, quite the creative combination you have there. Speaking of unique hobbies, it\u2019s funny you mentioned card collecting. I have a friend named Melissa who went to the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston and she's into card collecting too. As for myself, I'm an art student and I really enjoy biking and photography. So, do you know anyone from your circle who also loves these kind of activities?\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"Your hobbies sound fantastic, Giselle. It must be amazing capturing beautiful moments while biking. Actually, I do know someone who loves photography! His name's Johnnie. He's also quite unique as he's into blacksmithing. He went to the University of Akron. It always amazed me how he balances his artistry in both fields. Do you maybe know him, or anyone from Akron University?\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Johnnie seems quite cool but I can't say I've met him, or anyone from Akon University for that matter. However, you speaking of friends with a combination of artistic and unique interests made me think of my friend Joe. He is into blacksmithing but, unlike Johnnie, he went to Saint Joseph's University. So, have you ever crossed paths with any folks over at Saint Joseph's?\"\n\nTurn #5: Zane Bennett said: \"I don't think I've met anyone from Saint Joseph's University, at least not that I can remember. But Joe certainly sounds like someone who'd fit right in with my crowd. Speaking of unique interests, Louis is another name that pops into my mind. He's quite the fashion enthusiast and loves shopping. He graduated from Hesston College. How about you, Giselle? Do you know anyone who loves shopping or maybe someone from Hesston?\"\n\nTurn #6: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Shopping, huh? Now that you mention it, I do know someone who loves shopping - Micheline. She studied at the University of Hartford, though. Not Hesston. But who knows, they might have crossed paths at some fashion event. How about ice hockey? Ever bumped into any fans of that at your gatherings?\"\n\nTurn #7: Zane Bennett said: \"Ice hockey, now that's interesting! I can't say I've met an ice hockey enthusiast in my immediate circle. But talking about sports, my friend Robert, who graduated from the University of Akron, is all about water sports! Do you happen to know anyone who's into water sports, or maybe someone from Akron?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Water sports, how exciting! You know, I do have a friend who loves water sports, Elizabeth. She's adventurous like Robert, I bet. Interestingly, she graduated from St. John's College-Santa Fe, not Akron. Have you met anyone from St. John's College during your travels?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nZane Bennett's background: \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMelissa: Hobby: Card collecting School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nOrlando: Hobby: BASE jumping School: St. Ambrose University \nSteven: Hobby: Knitting School: St. John's College-Santa Fe \nElizabeth: Hobby: Water sports School: St. John's College-Santa Fe \nMelaine: Hobby: Geocaching School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nCharles: Hobby: Ice hockey School: Saint Joseph's University \nStephanie: Hobby: Card collecting School: University of California, Davis \nWilliam: Hobby: Ice hockey School: St. Ambrose University \nJoe: Hobby: Blacksmithing School: Saint Joseph's University \nMicheline: Hobby: Shopping School: University of Hartford \nDylan: Hobby: Card collecting School: Tennessee State University \n\nZane Bennett's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hi there! I'm Giselle. It's always so interesting to meet new people at parties like this. So, tell me a little about yourself. Do you have any hobbies or interesting things you're into?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Hi, Giselle! Nice to meet you. I'm Zane. As for hobbies, I spend most of my time working on graphic designs. And when I need to unwind, I enjoy playing my guitar. It really helps me to clear my mind. I\u2019ve been blessed to have some amazing friends who share similar interests, like Jacob for instance, who went to Whittier College and loves card collecting. Or perhaps you\u2019ve heard of Marjorie, a foraging enthusiast, she attended University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. How about you? Any odd hobbies or old schools that might create connections between us?\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Nice to meet you, Zane! Graphic design and guitar, quite the creative combination you have there. Speaking of unique hobbies, it\u2019s funny you mentioned card collecting. I have a friend named Melissa who went to the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston and she's into card collecting too. As for myself, I'm an art student and I really enjoy biking and photography. So, do you know anyone from your circle who also loves these kind of activities?\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"Your hobbies sound fantastic, Giselle. It must be amazing capturing beautiful moments while biking. Actually, I do know someone who loves photography! His name's Johnnie. He's also quite unique as he's into blacksmithing. He went to the University of Akron. It always amazed me how he balances his artistry in both fields. Do you maybe know him, or anyone from Akron University?\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Johnnie seems quite cool but I can't say I've met him, or anyone from Akon University for that matter. However, you speaking of friends with a combination of artistic and unique interests made me think of my friend Joe. He is into blacksmithing but, unlike Johnnie, he went to Saint Joseph's University. So, have you ever crossed paths with any folks over at Saint Joseph's?\"\n\nTurn #5: Zane Bennett said: \"I don't think I've met anyone from Saint Joseph's University, at least not that I can remember. But Joe certainly sounds like someone who'd fit right in with my crowd. Speaking of unique interests, Louis is another name that pops into my mind. He's quite the fashion enthusiast and loves shopping. He graduated from Hesston College. How about you, Giselle? Do you know anyone who loves shopping or maybe someone from Hesston?\"\n\nTurn #6: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Shopping, huh? Now that you mention it, I do know someone who loves shopping - Micheline. She studied at the University of Hartford, though. Not Hesston. But who knows, they might have crossed paths at some fashion event. How about ice hockey? Ever bumped into any fans of that at your gatherings?\"\n\nTurn #7: Zane Bennett said: \"Ice hockey, now that's interesting! I can't say I've met an ice hockey enthusiast in my immediate circle. But talking about sports, my friend Robert, who graduated from the University of Akron, is all about water sports! Do you happen to know anyone who's into water sports, or maybe someone from Akron?\"\n\nTurn #8: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Water sports, how exciting! You know, I do have a friend who loves water sports, Elizabeth. She's adventurous like Robert, I bet. Interestingly, she graduated from St. John's College-Santa Fe, not Akron. Have you met anyone from St. John's College during your travels?\"\n\nTurn #9: Zane Bennett said: \"Ah, St. John's College-Santa Fe. Unfortunately, I can't say I do. I guess our social circles are pretty unique in their own ways, Giselle! This was a lovely chat, but if you'll excuse me, I think I've spotted someone I need to say hi to. See you around!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Of course, Zane. It was a pleasure talking to you. Enjoy the party and see you around!'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nZane Bennett's background: \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMelissa: Hobby: Card collecting School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nOrlando: Hobby: BASE jumping School: St. Ambrose University \nSteven: Hobby: Knitting School: St. John's College-Santa Fe \nElizabeth: Hobby: Water sports School: St. John's College-Santa Fe \nMelaine: Hobby: Geocaching School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nCharles: Hobby: Ice hockey School: Saint Joseph's University \nStephanie: Hobby: Card collecting School: University of California, Davis \nWilliam: Hobby: Ice hockey School: St. Ambrose University \nJoe: Hobby: Blacksmithing School: Saint Joseph's University \nMicheline: Hobby: Shopping School: University of Hartford \nDylan: Hobby: Card collecting School: Tennessee State University \n\nZane Bennett's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hi there! I'm Giselle. It's always so interesting to meet new people at parties like this. So, tell me a little about yourself. Do you have any hobbies or interesting things you're into?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Hi, Giselle! Nice to meet you. I'm Zane. As for hobbies, I spend most of my time working on graphic designs. And when I need to unwind, I enjoy playing my guitar. It really helps me to clear my mind. I\u2019ve been blessed to have some amazing friends who share similar interests, like Jacob for instance, who went to Whittier College and loves card collecting. Or perhaps you\u2019ve heard of Marjorie, a foraging enthusiast, she attended University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. How about you? Any odd hobbies or old schools that might create connections between us?\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Nice to meet you, Zane! Graphic design and guitar, quite the creative combination you have there. Speaking of unique hobbies, it\u2019s funny you mentioned card collecting. I have a friend named Melissa who went to the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston and she's into card collecting too. As for myself, I'm an art student and I really enjoy biking and photography. So, do you know anyone from your circle who also loves these kind of activities?\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"Your hobbies sound fantastic, Giselle. It must be amazing capturing beautiful moments while biking. Actually, I do know someone who loves photography! His name's Johnnie. He's also quite unique as he's into blacksmithing. He went to the University of Akron. It always amazed me how he balances his artistry in both fields. Do you maybe know him, or anyone from Akron University?\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Johnnie seems quite cool but I can't say I've met him, or anyone from Akon University for that matter. However, you speaking of friends with a combination of artistic and unique interests made me think of my friend Joe. He is into blacksmithing but, unlike Johnnie, he went to Saint Joseph's University. So, have you ever crossed paths with any folks over at Saint Joseph's?\"\n\nTurn #5: Zane Bennett said: \"I don't think I've met anyone from Saint Joseph's University, at least not that I can remember. But Joe certainly sounds like someone who'd fit right in with my crowd. Speaking of unique interests, Louis is another name that pops into my mind. He's quite the fashion enthusiast and loves shopping. He graduated from Hesston College. How about you, Giselle? Do you know anyone who loves shopping or maybe someone from Hesston?\"\n\nTurn #6: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Shopping, huh? Now that you mention it, I do know someone who loves shopping - Micheline. She studied at the University of Hartford, though. Not Hesston. But who knows, they might have crossed paths at some fashion event. How about ice hockey? Ever bumped into any fans of that at your gatherings?\"\n\nTurn #7: Zane Bennett said: \"Ice hockey, now that's interesting! I can't say I've met an ice hockey enthusiast in my immediate circle. But talking about sports, my friend Robert, who graduated from the University of Akron, is all about water sports! Do you happen to know anyone who's into water sports, or maybe someone from Akron?\"\n\nTurn #8: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Water sports, how exciting! You know, I do have a friend who loves water sports, Elizabeth. She's adventurous like Robert, I bet. Interestingly, she graduated from St. John's College-Santa Fe, not Akron. Have you met anyone from St. John's College during your travels?\"\n\nTurn #9: Zane Bennett said: \"Ah, St. John's College-Santa Fe. Unfortunately, I can't say I do. I guess our social circles are pretty unique in their own ways, Giselle! This was a lovely chat, but if you'll excuse me, I think I've spotted someone I need to say hi to. See you around!\"\n\nTurn #10: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Of course, Zane. It was a pleasure talking to you. Enjoy the party and see you around!\"\n\nTurn #11: Zane Bennett left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Zane Bennett, your task is to act/speak as Zane Bennett would, keeping in mind Zane Bennett's social goal.\nYou can find Zane Bennett's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Zane Bennett's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Zane Bennett's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: \nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. Personality and values description: Zane Bennett is creative and outgoing, he values achievement and fairness. His decision-making is unique, often finding novel solutions to problems. Zane's secrets: He's secretly engaged to his best friend's ex.\nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Unknown\nZane Bennett's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nJacob: Hobby: Card collecting School: Whittier College \nMarjorie: Hobby: Foraging School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nCarrie: Hobby: Geocaching School: Tennessee State University \nLouis: Hobby: Shopping School: Hesston College \nMicheline: Hobby: Shopping School: University of Hartford \nEva: Hobby: Geocaching School: Hesston College \nJohnnie: Hobby: Blacksmithing School: University of Akron \nJohn: Hobby: Foraging School: University of California, Davis \nRonald: Hobby: Weightlifting School: Indiana University at South Bend \nCynthia: Hobby: Lacrosse School: Kansas State University \nRobert: Hobby: Water sports School: University of Akron\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hi there! I'm Giselle. It's always so interesting to meet new people at parties like this. So, tell me a little about yourself. Do you have any hobbies or interesting things you're into?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hi, Giselle! Nice to meet you. I'm Zane. As for hobbies, I spend most of my time working on graphic designs. And when I need to unwind, I enjoy playing my guitar. It really helps me to clear my mind. I\u2019ve been blessed to have some amazing friends who share similar interests, like Jacob for instance, who went to Whittier College and loves card collecting. Or perhaps you\u2019ve heard of Marjorie, a foraging enthusiast, she attended University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. How about you? Any odd hobbies or old schools that might create connections between us?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Zane Bennett, your task is to act/speak as Zane Bennett would, keeping in mind Zane Bennett's social goal.\nYou can find Zane Bennett's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Zane Bennett's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Zane Bennett's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: \nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. Personality and values description: Zane Bennett is creative and outgoing, he values achievement and fairness. His decision-making is unique, often finding novel solutions to problems. Zane's secrets: He's secretly engaged to his best friend's ex.\nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Unknown\nZane Bennett's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nJacob: Hobby: Card collecting School: Whittier College \nMarjorie: Hobby: Foraging School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nCarrie: Hobby: Geocaching School: Tennessee State University \nLouis: Hobby: Shopping School: Hesston College \nMicheline: Hobby: Shopping School: University of Hartford \nEva: Hobby: Geocaching School: Hesston College \nJohnnie: Hobby: Blacksmithing School: University of Akron \nJohn: Hobby: Foraging School: University of California, Davis \nRonald: Hobby: Weightlifting School: Indiana University at South Bend \nCynthia: Hobby: Lacrosse School: Kansas State University \nRobert: Hobby: Water sports School: University of Akron\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hi there! I'm Giselle. It's always so interesting to meet new people at parties like this. So, tell me a little about yourself. Do you have any hobbies or interesting things you're into?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Hi, Giselle! Nice to meet you. I'm Zane. As for hobbies, I spend most of my time working on graphic designs. And when I need to unwind, I enjoy playing my guitar. It really helps me to clear my mind. I\u2019ve been blessed to have some amazing friends who share similar interests, like Jacob for instance, who went to Whittier College and loves card collecting. Or perhaps you\u2019ve heard of Marjorie, a foraging enthusiast, she attended University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. How about you? Any odd hobbies or old schools that might create connections between us?\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Nice to meet you, Zane! Graphic design and guitar, quite the creative combination you have there. Speaking of unique hobbies, it\u2019s funny you mentioned card collecting. I have a friend named Melissa who went to the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston and she's into card collecting too. As for myself, I'm an art student and I really enjoy biking and photography. So, do you know anyone from your circle who also loves these kind of activities?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Your hobbies sound fantastic, Giselle. It must be amazing capturing beautiful moments while biking. Actually, I do know someone who loves photography! His name's Johnnie. He's also quite unique as he's into blacksmithing. He went to the University of Akron. It always amazed me how he balances his artistry in both fields. Do you maybe know him, or anyone from Akron University?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Zane Bennett, your task is to act/speak as Zane Bennett would, keeping in mind Zane Bennett's social goal.\nYou can find Zane Bennett's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Zane Bennett's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Zane Bennett's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: \nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. Personality and values description: Zane Bennett is creative and outgoing, he values achievement and fairness. His decision-making is unique, often finding novel solutions to problems. Zane's secrets: He's secretly engaged to his best friend's ex.\nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Unknown\nZane Bennett's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nJacob: Hobby: Card collecting School: Whittier College \nMarjorie: Hobby: Foraging School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nCarrie: Hobby: Geocaching School: Tennessee State University \nLouis: Hobby: Shopping School: Hesston College \nMicheline: Hobby: Shopping School: University of Hartford \nEva: Hobby: Geocaching School: Hesston College \nJohnnie: Hobby: Blacksmithing School: University of Akron \nJohn: Hobby: Foraging School: University of California, Davis \nRonald: Hobby: Weightlifting School: Indiana University at South Bend \nCynthia: Hobby: Lacrosse School: Kansas State University \nRobert: Hobby: Water sports School: University of Akron\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hi there! I'm Giselle. It's always so interesting to meet new people at parties like this. So, tell me a little about yourself. Do you have any hobbies or interesting things you're into?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Hi, Giselle! Nice to meet you. I'm Zane. As for hobbies, I spend most of my time working on graphic designs. And when I need to unwind, I enjoy playing my guitar. It really helps me to clear my mind. I\u2019ve been blessed to have some amazing friends who share similar interests, like Jacob for instance, who went to Whittier College and loves card collecting. Or perhaps you\u2019ve heard of Marjorie, a foraging enthusiast, she attended University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. How about you? Any odd hobbies or old schools that might create connections between us?\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Nice to meet you, Zane! Graphic design and guitar, quite the creative combination you have there. Speaking of unique hobbies, it\u2019s funny you mentioned card collecting. I have a friend named Melissa who went to the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston and she's into card collecting too. As for myself, I'm an art student and I really enjoy biking and photography. So, do you know anyone from your circle who also loves these kind of activities?\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"Your hobbies sound fantastic, Giselle. It must be amazing capturing beautiful moments while biking. Actually, I do know someone who loves photography! His name's Johnnie. He's also quite unique as he's into blacksmithing. He went to the University of Akron. It always amazed me how he balances his artistry in both fields. Do you maybe know him, or anyone from Akron University?\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Johnnie seems quite cool but I can't say I've met him, or anyone from Akon University for that matter. However, you speaking of friends with a combination of artistic and unique interests made me think of my friend Joe. He is into blacksmithing but, unlike Johnnie, he went to Saint Joseph's University. So, have you ever crossed paths with any folks over at Saint Joseph's?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I don't think I've met anyone from Saint Joseph's University, at least not that I can remember. But Joe certainly sounds like someone who'd fit right in with my crowd. Speaking of unique interests, Louis is another name that pops into my mind. He's quite the fashion enthusiast and loves shopping. He graduated from Hesston College. How about you, Giselle? Do you know anyone who loves shopping or maybe someone from Hesston?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Zane Bennett, your task is to act/speak as Zane Bennett would, keeping in mind Zane Bennett's social goal.\nYou can find Zane Bennett's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Zane Bennett's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Zane Bennett's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: \nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. Personality and values description: Zane Bennett is creative and outgoing, he values achievement and fairness. His decision-making is unique, often finding novel solutions to problems. Zane's secrets: He's secretly engaged to his best friend's ex.\nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Unknown\nZane Bennett's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nJacob: Hobby: Card collecting School: Whittier College \nMarjorie: Hobby: Foraging School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nCarrie: Hobby: Geocaching School: Tennessee State University \nLouis: Hobby: Shopping School: Hesston College \nMicheline: Hobby: Shopping School: University of Hartford \nEva: Hobby: Geocaching School: Hesston College \nJohnnie: Hobby: Blacksmithing School: University of Akron \nJohn: Hobby: Foraging School: University of California, Davis \nRonald: Hobby: Weightlifting School: Indiana University at South Bend \nCynthia: Hobby: Lacrosse School: Kansas State University \nRobert: Hobby: Water sports School: University of Akron\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hi there! I'm Giselle. It's always so interesting to meet new people at parties like this. So, tell me a little about yourself. Do you have any hobbies or interesting things you're into?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Hi, Giselle! Nice to meet you. I'm Zane. As for hobbies, I spend most of my time working on graphic designs. And when I need to unwind, I enjoy playing my guitar. It really helps me to clear my mind. I\u2019ve been blessed to have some amazing friends who share similar interests, like Jacob for instance, who went to Whittier College and loves card collecting. Or perhaps you\u2019ve heard of Marjorie, a foraging enthusiast, she attended University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. How about you? Any odd hobbies or old schools that might create connections between us?\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Nice to meet you, Zane! Graphic design and guitar, quite the creative combination you have there. Speaking of unique hobbies, it\u2019s funny you mentioned card collecting. I have a friend named Melissa who went to the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston and she's into card collecting too. As for myself, I'm an art student and I really enjoy biking and photography. So, do you know anyone from your circle who also loves these kind of activities?\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"Your hobbies sound fantastic, Giselle. It must be amazing capturing beautiful moments while biking. Actually, I do know someone who loves photography! His name's Johnnie. He's also quite unique as he's into blacksmithing. He went to the University of Akron. It always amazed me how he balances his artistry in both fields. Do you maybe know him, or anyone from Akron University?\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Johnnie seems quite cool but I can't say I've met him, or anyone from Akon University for that matter. However, you speaking of friends with a combination of artistic and unique interests made me think of my friend Joe. He is into blacksmithing but, unlike Johnnie, he went to Saint Joseph's University. So, have you ever crossed paths with any folks over at Saint Joseph's?\"\n\nTurn #5: Zane Bennett said: \"I don't think I've met anyone from Saint Joseph's University, at least not that I can remember. But Joe certainly sounds like someone who'd fit right in with my crowd. Speaking of unique interests, Louis is another name that pops into my mind. He's quite the fashion enthusiast and loves shopping. He graduated from Hesston College. How about you, Giselle? Do you know anyone who loves shopping or maybe someone from Hesston?\"\n\nTurn #6: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Shopping, huh? Now that you mention it, I do know someone who loves shopping - Micheline. She studied at the University of Hartford, though. Not Hesston. But who knows, they might have crossed paths at some fashion event. How about ice hockey? Ever bumped into any fans of that at your gatherings?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ice hockey, now that's interesting! I can't say I've met an ice hockey enthusiast in my immediate circle. But talking about sports, my friend Robert, who graduated from the University of Akron, is all about water sports! Do you happen to know anyone who's into water sports, or maybe someone from Akron?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Zane Bennett, your task is to act/speak as Zane Bennett would, keeping in mind Zane Bennett's social goal.\nYou can find Zane Bennett's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Zane Bennett's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Zane Bennett's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: \nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. Personality and values description: Zane Bennett is creative and outgoing, he values achievement and fairness. His decision-making is unique, often finding novel solutions to problems. Zane's secrets: He's secretly engaged to his best friend's ex.\nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Unknown\nZane Bennett's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nJacob: Hobby: Card collecting School: Whittier College \nMarjorie: Hobby: Foraging School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nCarrie: Hobby: Geocaching School: Tennessee State University \nLouis: Hobby: Shopping School: Hesston College \nMicheline: Hobby: Shopping School: University of Hartford \nEva: Hobby: Geocaching School: Hesston College \nJohnnie: Hobby: Blacksmithing School: University of Akron \nJohn: Hobby: Foraging School: University of California, Davis \nRonald: Hobby: Weightlifting School: Indiana University at South Bend \nCynthia: Hobby: Lacrosse School: Kansas State University \nRobert: Hobby: Water sports School: University of Akron\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hi there! I'm Giselle. It's always so interesting to meet new people at parties like this. So, tell me a little about yourself. Do you have any hobbies or interesting things you're into?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Hi, Giselle! Nice to meet you. I'm Zane. As for hobbies, I spend most of my time working on graphic designs. And when I need to unwind, I enjoy playing my guitar. It really helps me to clear my mind. I\u2019ve been blessed to have some amazing friends who share similar interests, like Jacob for instance, who went to Whittier College and loves card collecting. Or perhaps you\u2019ve heard of Marjorie, a foraging enthusiast, she attended University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. How about you? Any odd hobbies or old schools that might create connections between us?\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Nice to meet you, Zane! Graphic design and guitar, quite the creative combination you have there. Speaking of unique hobbies, it\u2019s funny you mentioned card collecting. I have a friend named Melissa who went to the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston and she's into card collecting too. As for myself, I'm an art student and I really enjoy biking and photography. So, do you know anyone from your circle who also loves these kind of activities?\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"Your hobbies sound fantastic, Giselle. It must be amazing capturing beautiful moments while biking. Actually, I do know someone who loves photography! His name's Johnnie. He's also quite unique as he's into blacksmithing. He went to the University of Akron. It always amazed me how he balances his artistry in both fields. Do you maybe know him, or anyone from Akron University?\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Johnnie seems quite cool but I can't say I've met him, or anyone from Akon University for that matter. However, you speaking of friends with a combination of artistic and unique interests made me think of my friend Joe. He is into blacksmithing but, unlike Johnnie, he went to Saint Joseph's University. So, have you ever crossed paths with any folks over at Saint Joseph's?\"\n\nTurn #5: Zane Bennett said: \"I don't think I've met anyone from Saint Joseph's University, at least not that I can remember. But Joe certainly sounds like someone who'd fit right in with my crowd. Speaking of unique interests, Louis is another name that pops into my mind. He's quite the fashion enthusiast and loves shopping. He graduated from Hesston College. How about you, Giselle? Do you know anyone who loves shopping or maybe someone from Hesston?\"\n\nTurn #6: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Shopping, huh? Now that you mention it, I do know someone who loves shopping - Micheline. She studied at the University of Hartford, though. Not Hesston. But who knows, they might have crossed paths at some fashion event. How about ice hockey? Ever bumped into any fans of that at your gatherings?\"\n\nTurn #7: Zane Bennett said: \"Ice hockey, now that's interesting! I can't say I've met an ice hockey enthusiast in my immediate circle. But talking about sports, my friend Robert, who graduated from the University of Akron, is all about water sports! Do you happen to know anyone who's into water sports, or maybe someone from Akron?\"\n\nTurn #8: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Water sports, how exciting! You know, I do have a friend who loves water sports, Elizabeth. She's adventurous like Robert, I bet. Interestingly, she graduated from St. John's College-Santa Fe, not Akron. Have you met anyone from St. John's College during your travels?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ah, St. John's College-Santa Fe. Unfortunately, I can't say I do. I guess our social circles are pretty unique in their own ways, Giselle! This was a lovely chat, but if you'll excuse me, I think I've spotted someone I need to say hi to. See you around!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Zane Bennett, your task is to act/speak as Zane Bennett would, keeping in mind Zane Bennett's social goal.\nYou can find Zane Bennett's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Zane Bennett's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Zane Bennett's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: \nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. Personality and values description: Zane Bennett is creative and outgoing, he values achievement and fairness. His decision-making is unique, often finding novel solutions to problems. Zane's secrets: He's secretly engaged to his best friend's ex.\nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Unknown\nZane Bennett's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nJacob: Hobby: Card collecting School: Whittier College \nMarjorie: Hobby: Foraging School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nCarrie: Hobby: Geocaching School: Tennessee State University \nLouis: Hobby: Shopping School: Hesston College \nMicheline: Hobby: Shopping School: University of Hartford \nEva: Hobby: Geocaching School: Hesston College \nJohnnie: Hobby: Blacksmithing School: University of Akron \nJohn: Hobby: Foraging School: University of California, Davis \nRonald: Hobby: Weightlifting School: Indiana University at South Bend \nCynthia: Hobby: Lacrosse School: Kansas State University \nRobert: Hobby: Water sports School: University of Akron\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hi there! I'm Giselle. It's always so interesting to meet new people at parties like this. So, tell me a little about yourself. Do you have any hobbies or interesting things you're into?\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"Hi, Giselle! Nice to meet you. I'm Zane. As for hobbies, I spend most of my time working on graphic designs. And when I need to unwind, I enjoy playing my guitar. It really helps me to clear my mind. I\u2019ve been blessed to have some amazing friends who share similar interests, like Jacob for instance, who went to Whittier College and loves card collecting. Or perhaps you\u2019ve heard of Marjorie, a foraging enthusiast, she attended University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. How about you? Any odd hobbies or old schools that might create connections between us?\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Nice to meet you, Zane! Graphic design and guitar, quite the creative combination you have there. Speaking of unique hobbies, it\u2019s funny you mentioned card collecting. I have a friend named Melissa who went to the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston and she's into card collecting too. As for myself, I'm an art student and I really enjoy biking and photography. So, do you know anyone from your circle who also loves these kind of activities?\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"Your hobbies sound fantastic, Giselle. It must be amazing capturing beautiful moments while biking. Actually, I do know someone who loves photography! His name's Johnnie. He's also quite unique as he's into blacksmithing. He went to the University of Akron. It always amazed me how he balances his artistry in both fields. Do you maybe know him, or anyone from Akron University?\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Johnnie seems quite cool but I can't say I've met him, or anyone from Akon University for that matter. However, you speaking of friends with a combination of artistic and unique interests made me think of my friend Joe. He is into blacksmithing but, unlike Johnnie, he went to Saint Joseph's University. So, have you ever crossed paths with any folks over at Saint Joseph's?\"\n\nTurn #5: Zane Bennett said: \"I don't think I've met anyone from Saint Joseph's University, at least not that I can remember. But Joe certainly sounds like someone who'd fit right in with my crowd. Speaking of unique interests, Louis is another name that pops into my mind. He's quite the fashion enthusiast and loves shopping. He graduated from Hesston College. How about you, Giselle? Do you know anyone who loves shopping or maybe someone from Hesston?\"\n\nTurn #6: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Shopping, huh? Now that you mention it, I do know someone who loves shopping - Micheline. She studied at the University of Hartford, though. Not Hesston. But who knows, they might have crossed paths at some fashion event. How about ice hockey? Ever bumped into any fans of that at your gatherings?\"\n\nTurn #7: Zane Bennett said: \"Ice hockey, now that's interesting! I can't say I've met an ice hockey enthusiast in my immediate circle. But talking about sports, my friend Robert, who graduated from the University of Akron, is all about water sports! Do you happen to know anyone who's into water sports, or maybe someone from Akron?\"\n\nTurn #8: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Water sports, how exciting! You know, I do have a friend who loves water sports, Elizabeth. She's adventurous like Robert, I bet. Interestingly, she graduated from St. John's College-Santa Fe, not Akron. Have you met anyone from St. John's College during your travels?\"\n\nTurn #9: Zane Bennett said: \"Ah, St. John's College-Santa Fe. Unfortunately, I can't say I do. I guess our social circles are pretty unique in their own ways, Giselle! This was a lovely chat, but if you'll excuse me, I think I've spotted someone I need to say hi to. See you around!\"\n\nTurn #10: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Of course, Zane. It was a pleasure talking to you. Enjoy the party and see you around!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Antique Chair for $15.0, while another person is interested in purchasing it. Here's what you need to know about the item: it's a beautifully carved antique wooden chair. It's in good condition, but could probably benefit from a fresh seat cushion.\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Benjamin Jackson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nBenjamin Jackson's background: \nDonovan Reeves's goal: You are the buyer for this item, and your target price is $9.0. If you purchase it at a significantly higher price, be aware that you will incur a penalty. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hey there! I saw you're selling this antique chair, could you tell me a little more about its history? By the way, I'm pretty tight on budget, would you consider any negotiations on the price?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Antique Chair for $15.0, while another person is interested in purchasing it. Here's what you need to know about the item: it's a beautifully carved antique wooden chair. It's in good condition, but could probably benefit from a fresh seat cushion.\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Benjamin Jackson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nBenjamin Jackson's background: \nDonovan Reeves's goal: You are the buyer for this item, and your target price is $9.0. If you purchase it at a significantly higher price, be aware that you will incur a penalty. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey there! I saw you're selling this antique chair, could you tell me a little more about its history? By the way, I'm pretty tight on budget, would you consider any negotiations on the price?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hi Donovan! This chair belonged to my grandmother, it carries a lot of fond memories with it. As for the price, I can understand where you're coming from. The price I listed it for already reflects its true value, but considering I'd like to see it put to good use rather than collect dust, we could negotiate a bit, how does that sound?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That does sound great Benjamin, thank you. I really appreciate the sentimental value of the chair and I'll take good care of it. Considering my budget restriction, would you perhaps be willing to drop the price down to $9? I could pick it up today if that helps.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Antique Chair for $15.0, while another person is interested in purchasing it. Here's what you need to know about the item: it's a beautifully carved antique wooden chair. It's in good condition, but could probably benefit from a fresh seat cushion.\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Benjamin Jackson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nBenjamin Jackson's background: \nDonovan Reeves's goal: You are the buyer for this item, and your target price is $9.0. If you purchase it at a significantly higher price, be aware that you will incur a penalty. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey there! I saw you're selling this antique chair, could you tell me a little more about its history? By the way, I'm pretty tight on budget, would you consider any negotiations on the price?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hi Donovan! This chair belonged to my grandmother, it carries a lot of fond memories with it. As for the price, I can understand where you're coming from. The price I listed it for already reflects its true value, but considering I'd like to see it put to good use rather than collect dust, we could negotiate a bit, how does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"That does sound great Benjamin, thank you. I really appreciate the sentimental value of the chair and I'll take good care of it. Considering my budget restriction, would you perhaps be willing to drop the price down to $9? I could pick it up today if that helps.\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I'm glad to hear that you value its sentimental importance, Donovan. Sure, I can drop it to $9 as a token of goodwill; especially since you'll be picking it up today. You're giving this chair a new home and I can tell you'll take good care of it.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you so much Benjamin. You've been really kind throughout this process. I assure you, the chair will have a well-deserved place in my home. See you in a bit!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Donovan Reeves, your task is to act/speak as Donovan Reeves would, keeping in mind Donovan Reeves's social goal.\nYou can find Donovan Reeves's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Donovan Reeves's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Donovan Reeves's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Antique Chair for $15.0, while another person is interested in purchasing it. Here's what you need to know about the item: it's a beautifully carved antique wooden chair. It's in good condition, but could probably benefit from a fresh seat cushion.\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Benjamin Jackson\nDonovan Reeves's background: Donovan Reeves is a 27-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Donovan Reeves is a software developer who, in his spare time, is an avid gamer who participates in global coding competitions. Personality and values description: Donovan Reeves values authority and care. Even though he's outgoing and hardworking, he can be somewhat moody. His decision-making style varies according to the situation at hand. Donovan's secrets: Secretly releasing classified government information online\nBenjamin Jackson's background: \nDonovan Reeves's goal: You are the buyer for this item, and your target price is $9.0. If you purchase it at a significantly higher price, be aware that you will incur a penalty. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey there! I saw you're selling this antique chair, could you tell me a little more about its history? By the way, I'm pretty tight on budget, would you consider any negotiations on the price?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hi Donovan! This chair belonged to my grandmother, it carries a lot of fond memories with it. As for the price, I can understand where you're coming from. The price I listed it for already reflects its true value, but considering I'd like to see it put to good use rather than collect dust, we could negotiate a bit, how does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"That does sound great Benjamin, thank you. I really appreciate the sentimental value of the chair and I'll take good care of it. Considering my budget restriction, would you perhaps be willing to drop the price down to $9? I could pick it up today if that helps.\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I'm glad to hear that you value its sentimental importance, Donovan. Sure, I can drop it to $9 as a token of goodwill; especially since you'll be picking it up today. You're giving this chair a new home and I can tell you'll take good care of it.\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"Thank you so much Benjamin. You've been really kind throughout this process. I assure you, the chair will have a well-deserved place in my home. See you in a bit!\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"You're welcome, Donovan! Let's keep preserving our personal and global histories together. I'm really glad we made a deal. See you soon then, safe travels!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Antique Chair for $15.0, while another person is interested in purchasing it. Here's what you need to know about the item: it's a beautifully carved antique wooden chair. It's in good condition, but could probably benefit from a fresh seat cushion.\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Benjamin Jackson\nDonovan Reeves's background: \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: You are the seller for this item and your target price is $8. You should be aware that if you sell it for a price significantly lower than the target price, you will incur a penalty. However, if you manage to sell it for more than the target price, you stand to receive a bonus.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey there! I saw you're selling this antique chair, could you tell me a little more about its history? By the way, I'm pretty tight on budget, would you consider any negotiations on the price?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hi Donovan! This chair belonged to my grandmother, it carries a lot of fond memories with it. As for the price, I can understand where you're coming from. The price I listed it for already reflects its true value, but considering I'd like to see it put to good use rather than collect dust, we could negotiate a bit, how does that sound?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Antique Chair for $15.0, while another person is interested in purchasing it. Here's what you need to know about the item: it's a beautifully carved antique wooden chair. It's in good condition, but could probably benefit from a fresh seat cushion.\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Benjamin Jackson\nDonovan Reeves's background: \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: You are the seller for this item and your target price is $8. You should be aware that if you sell it for a price significantly lower than the target price, you will incur a penalty. However, if you manage to sell it for more than the target price, you stand to receive a bonus.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey there! I saw you're selling this antique chair, could you tell me a little more about its history? By the way, I'm pretty tight on budget, would you consider any negotiations on the price?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hi Donovan! This chair belonged to my grandmother, it carries a lot of fond memories with it. As for the price, I can understand where you're coming from. The price I listed it for already reflects its true value, but considering I'd like to see it put to good use rather than collect dust, we could negotiate a bit, how does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"That does sound great Benjamin, thank you. I really appreciate the sentimental value of the chair and I'll take good care of it. Considering my budget restriction, would you perhaps be willing to drop the price down to $9? I could pick it up today if that helps.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad to hear that you value its sentimental importance, Donovan. Sure, I can drop it to $9 as a token of goodwill; especially since you'll be picking it up today. You're giving this chair a new home and I can tell you'll take good care of it.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Antique Chair for $15.0, while another person is interested in purchasing it. Here's what you need to know about the item: it's a beautifully carved antique wooden chair. It's in good condition, but could probably benefit from a fresh seat cushion.\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Benjamin Jackson\nDonovan Reeves's background: \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: You are the seller for this item and your target price is $8. You should be aware that if you sell it for a price significantly lower than the target price, you will incur a penalty. However, if you manage to sell it for more than the target price, you stand to receive a bonus.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey there! I saw you're selling this antique chair, could you tell me a little more about its history? By the way, I'm pretty tight on budget, would you consider any negotiations on the price?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hi Donovan! This chair belonged to my grandmother, it carries a lot of fond memories with it. As for the price, I can understand where you're coming from. The price I listed it for already reflects its true value, but considering I'd like to see it put to good use rather than collect dust, we could negotiate a bit, how does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"That does sound great Benjamin, thank you. I really appreciate the sentimental value of the chair and I'll take good care of it. Considering my budget restriction, would you perhaps be willing to drop the price down to $9? I could pick it up today if that helps.\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I'm glad to hear that you value its sentimental importance, Donovan. Sure, I can drop it to $9 as a token of goodwill; especially since you'll be picking it up today. You're giving this chair a new home and I can tell you'll take good care of it.\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"Thank you so much Benjamin. You've been really kind throughout this process. I assure you, the chair will have a well-deserved place in my home. See you in a bit!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're welcome, Donovan! Let's keep preserving our personal and global histories together. I'm really glad we made a deal. See you soon then, safe travels!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Benjamin Jackson, your task is to act/speak as Benjamin Jackson would, keeping in mind Benjamin Jackson's social goal.\nYou can find Benjamin Jackson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Benjamin Jackson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Benjamin Jackson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Antique Chair for $15.0, while another person is interested in purchasing it. Here's what you need to know about the item: it's a beautifully carved antique wooden chair. It's in good condition, but could probably benefit from a fresh seat cushion.\nParticipants: Donovan Reeves and Benjamin Jackson\nDonovan Reeves's background: \nBenjamin Jackson's background: Benjamin Jackson is a 24-year-old male environmental activist. He/him pronouns. Benjamin Jackson is well-known for his impassioned speeches. Personality and values description: Benjamin Jackson, expressive and imaginative, leans towards self-direction and liberty. His decisions aim for societal betterment. Benjamin's secrets: Descendant of a wealthy oil tycoon, rejects family fortune\nDonovan Reeves's goal: Unknown\nBenjamin Jackson's goal: You are the seller for this item and your target price is $8. You should be aware that if you sell it for a price significantly lower than the target price, you will incur a penalty. However, if you manage to sell it for more than the target price, you stand to receive a bonus.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Donovan Reeves said: \"Hey there! I saw you're selling this antique chair, could you tell me a little more about its history? By the way, I'm pretty tight on budget, would you consider any negotiations on the price?\"\n\nTurn #1: Benjamin Jackson said: \"Hi Donovan! This chair belonged to my grandmother, it carries a lot of fond memories with it. As for the price, I can understand where you're coming from. The price I listed it for already reflects its true value, but considering I'd like to see it put to good use rather than collect dust, we could negotiate a bit, how does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #2: Donovan Reeves said: \"That does sound great Benjamin, thank you. I really appreciate the sentimental value of the chair and I'll take good care of it. Considering my budget restriction, would you perhaps be willing to drop the price down to $9? I could pick it up today if that helps.\"\n\nTurn #3: Benjamin Jackson said: \"I'm glad to hear that you value its sentimental importance, Donovan. Sure, I can drop it to $9 as a token of goodwill; especially since you'll be picking it up today. You're giving this chair a new home and I can tell you'll take good care of it.\"\n\nTurn #4: Donovan Reeves said: \"Thank you so much Benjamin. You've been really kind throughout this process. I assure you, the chair will have a well-deserved place in my home. See you in a bit!\"\n\nTurn #5: Benjamin Jackson said: \"You're welcome, Donovan! Let's keep preserving our personal and global histories together. I'm really glad we made a deal. See you soon then, safe travels!\"\n\nTurn #6: Donovan Reeves left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDavid: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Christian Moerlein Brewing Company Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nLarry: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nLynn: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Cray Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nDonald: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Advance Auto Parts Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nDennis: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nJane: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Planet Hollywood Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nHarvey: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: Sony Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nNinfa: Hobby: Quilting Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nAngelica: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Planet Hollywood Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \n\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Nice to meet you, Hendrick. I couldn't help but overhear you mention something about homebrewing. It seems like quite an interesting hobby, do you have any specialties?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDavid: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Christian Moerlein Brewing Company Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nLarry: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nLynn: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Cray Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nDonald: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Advance Auto Parts Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nDennis: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nJane: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Planet Hollywood Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nHarvey: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: Sony Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nNinfa: Hobby: Quilting Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nAngelica: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Planet Hollywood Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \n\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Nice to meet you, Hendrick. I couldn't help but overhear you mention something about homebrewing. It seems like quite an interesting hobby, do you have any specialties?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Thank you, Lily. Yes, homebrewing is one of my interests. I've recently been experimenting with chardonnay and malbec. Speaking of wine, I host monthly wine tastings. By any chance, do you attend any kind of tasting or hobby-events in town? Maybe we could have bumped into each other there.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds intriguing, Hendrick. You know, a great friend of mine loves homebrewing too. He's a splendid chap, spends his afternoons working for Christian Moerlein Brewing Company. I wonder if you know him, he enjoys indoor activities quite a lot.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDavid: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Christian Moerlein Brewing Company Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nLarry: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nLynn: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Cray Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nDonald: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Advance Auto Parts Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nDennis: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nJane: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Planet Hollywood Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nHarvey: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: Sony Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nNinfa: Hobby: Quilting Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nAngelica: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Planet Hollywood Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \n\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Nice to meet you, Hendrick. I couldn't help but overhear you mention something about homebrewing. It seems like quite an interesting hobby, do you have any specialties?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Thank you, Lily. Yes, homebrewing is one of my interests. I've recently been experimenting with chardonnay and malbec. Speaking of wine, I host monthly wine tastings. By any chance, do you attend any kind of tasting or hobby-events in town? Maybe we could have bumped into each other there.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"That sounds intriguing, Hendrick. You know, a great friend of mine loves homebrewing too. He's a splendid chap, spends his afternoons working for Christian Moerlein Brewing Company. I wonder if you know him, he enjoys indoor activities quite a lot.\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ah, a fellow homebrew enthusiast, nothing quite like a homemade brew, is there? That's mighty interesting, Lily. Though, I can't say I know any brewers from Christian Moerlein, I do have a friend named Harvey who loves amateur radio and works in Sony Company. He's an indoor type of person too. Does your friend happen to share these interests?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Oh! Hearing about your friend Harvey, it reminds me of another buddy of mine, who is into amateur radio as well. He works at The J.M. Smucker Company and usually spends his mornings outdoors. Perhaps you two might know each other?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDavid: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Christian Moerlein Brewing Company Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nLarry: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nLynn: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Cray Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nDonald: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Advance Auto Parts Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nDennis: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nJane: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Planet Hollywood Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nHarvey: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: Sony Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nNinfa: Hobby: Quilting Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nAngelica: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Planet Hollywood Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \n\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Nice to meet you, Hendrick. I couldn't help but overhear you mention something about homebrewing. It seems like quite an interesting hobby, do you have any specialties?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Thank you, Lily. Yes, homebrewing is one of my interests. I've recently been experimenting with chardonnay and malbec. Speaking of wine, I host monthly wine tastings. By any chance, do you attend any kind of tasting or hobby-events in town? Maybe we could have bumped into each other there.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"That sounds intriguing, Hendrick. You know, a great friend of mine loves homebrewing too. He's a splendid chap, spends his afternoons working for Christian Moerlein Brewing Company. I wonder if you know him, he enjoys indoor activities quite a lot.\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ah, a fellow homebrew enthusiast, nothing quite like a homemade brew, is there? That's mighty interesting, Lily. Though, I can't say I know any brewers from Christian Moerlein, I do have a friend named Harvey who loves amateur radio and works in Sony Company. He's an indoor type of person too. Does your friend happen to share these interests?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"Oh! Hearing about your friend Harvey, it reminds me of another buddy of mine, who is into amateur radio as well. He works at The J.M. Smucker Company and usually spends his mornings outdoors. Perhaps you two might know each other?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Interesting indeed. It seems our circles might intersect in unexpected ways. Speaking of your friend who likes amateur radio, I do have a friend, Blake who also works at The J.M. Smucker Company. He's more of an evening person and loves dancing! Any chance your friend shares these tastes?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Funny you mention Blake, I believe one of my friends from The J.M. Smucker Co. might know him. She enjoys her mornings outdoors quilting. I wonder if Blake might have heard of her, her name's Ninfa.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDavid: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Christian Moerlein Brewing Company Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nLarry: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nLynn: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Cray Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nDonald: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Advance Auto Parts Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nDennis: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nJane: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Planet Hollywood Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nHarvey: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: Sony Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nNinfa: Hobby: Quilting Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nAngelica: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Planet Hollywood Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \n\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Nice to meet you, Hendrick. I couldn't help but overhear you mention something about homebrewing. It seems like quite an interesting hobby, do you have any specialties?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Thank you, Lily. Yes, homebrewing is one of my interests. I've recently been experimenting with chardonnay and malbec. Speaking of wine, I host monthly wine tastings. By any chance, do you attend any kind of tasting or hobby-events in town? Maybe we could have bumped into each other there.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"That sounds intriguing, Hendrick. You know, a great friend of mine loves homebrewing too. He's a splendid chap, spends his afternoons working for Christian Moerlein Brewing Company. I wonder if you know him, he enjoys indoor activities quite a lot.\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ah, a fellow homebrew enthusiast, nothing quite like a homemade brew, is there? That's mighty interesting, Lily. Though, I can't say I know any brewers from Christian Moerlein, I do have a friend named Harvey who loves amateur radio and works in Sony Company. He's an indoor type of person too. Does your friend happen to share these interests?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"Oh! Hearing about your friend Harvey, it reminds me of another buddy of mine, who is into amateur radio as well. He works at The J.M. Smucker Company and usually spends his mornings outdoors. Perhaps you two might know each other?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Interesting indeed. It seems our circles might intersect in unexpected ways. Speaking of your friend who likes amateur radio, I do have a friend, Blake who also works at The J.M. Smucker Company. He's more of an evening person and loves dancing! Any chance your friend shares these tastes?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Funny you mention Blake, I believe one of my friends from The J.M. Smucker Co. might know him. She enjoys her mornings outdoors quilting. I wonder if Blake might have heard of her, her name's Ninfa.\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"It seems our friends do run in similar circles, don't they? Regarding Ninfa, it's quite possible, Blake may know her considering they work at the same company. In fact, Blake has a penchant for outdoor evening events, especially those involving dance. Does Ninfa share a love for dancing?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Dancing isn't really Ninfa's forte, she's more into peaceful and crafty hobbies like quilting. Your friend Blake should definitely join one of our quilting events in the morning, they're much fun.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDavid: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Christian Moerlein Brewing Company Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nLarry: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nLynn: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Cray Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nDonald: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Advance Auto Parts Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nDennis: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nJane: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Planet Hollywood Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nHarvey: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: Sony Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nNinfa: Hobby: Quilting Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nAngelica: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Planet Hollywood Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \n\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Nice to meet you, Hendrick. I couldn't help but overhear you mention something about homebrewing. It seems like quite an interesting hobby, do you have any specialties?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Thank you, Lily. Yes, homebrewing is one of my interests. I've recently been experimenting with chardonnay and malbec. Speaking of wine, I host monthly wine tastings. By any chance, do you attend any kind of tasting or hobby-events in town? Maybe we could have bumped into each other there.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"That sounds intriguing, Hendrick. You know, a great friend of mine loves homebrewing too. He's a splendid chap, spends his afternoons working for Christian Moerlein Brewing Company. I wonder if you know him, he enjoys indoor activities quite a lot.\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ah, a fellow homebrew enthusiast, nothing quite like a homemade brew, is there? That's mighty interesting, Lily. Though, I can't say I know any brewers from Christian Moerlein, I do have a friend named Harvey who loves amateur radio and works in Sony Company. He's an indoor type of person too. Does your friend happen to share these interests?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"Oh! Hearing about your friend Harvey, it reminds me of another buddy of mine, who is into amateur radio as well. He works at The J.M. Smucker Company and usually spends his mornings outdoors. Perhaps you two might know each other?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Interesting indeed. It seems our circles might intersect in unexpected ways. Speaking of your friend who likes amateur radio, I do have a friend, Blake who also works at The J.M. Smucker Company. He's more of an evening person and loves dancing! Any chance your friend shares these tastes?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Funny you mention Blake, I believe one of my friends from The J.M. Smucker Co. might know him. She enjoys her mornings outdoors quilting. I wonder if Blake might have heard of her, her name's Ninfa.\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"It seems our friends do run in similar circles, don't they? Regarding Ninfa, it's quite possible, Blake may know her considering they work at the same company. In fact, Blake has a penchant for outdoor evening events, especially those involving dance. Does Ninfa share a love for dancing?\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"Dancing isn't really Ninfa's forte, she's more into peaceful and crafty hobbies like quilting. Your friend Blake should definitely join one of our quilting events in the morning, they're much fun.\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"How delightful! Perhaps Blake could learn a thing or two about quilting. It's wonderful how varied our interests can be. Thinking of peaceful hobbies, this reminded me of my friend Frank. He's fond of collecting postage cards - quite unique isn't it? He works at Ebonite International, maybe they could meet at some indoor afternoon event some time. Just curious, would this hobby intersect with Ninfa's circle?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Well, Ninfa may not be into postage cards collection, but another friend of mine, Donald, likes indoor activities in the afternoon. He works at Advance Auto Parts and enjoys homebrewing, just like you do. I wouldn't be surprised if they've crossed paths at an event or two. He might be interested in meeting Frank.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDavid: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Christian Moerlein Brewing Company Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nLarry: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nLynn: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Cray Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nDonald: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Advance Auto Parts Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nDennis: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nJane: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Planet Hollywood Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nHarvey: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: Sony Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nNinfa: Hobby: Quilting Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nAngelica: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Planet Hollywood Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \n\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Nice to meet you, Hendrick. I couldn't help but overhear you mention something about homebrewing. It seems like quite an interesting hobby, do you have any specialties?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Thank you, Lily. Yes, homebrewing is one of my interests. I've recently been experimenting with chardonnay and malbec. Speaking of wine, I host monthly wine tastings. By any chance, do you attend any kind of tasting or hobby-events in town? Maybe we could have bumped into each other there.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"That sounds intriguing, Hendrick. You know, a great friend of mine loves homebrewing too. He's a splendid chap, spends his afternoons working for Christian Moerlein Brewing Company. I wonder if you know him, he enjoys indoor activities quite a lot.\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ah, a fellow homebrew enthusiast, nothing quite like a homemade brew, is there? That's mighty interesting, Lily. Though, I can't say I know any brewers from Christian Moerlein, I do have a friend named Harvey who loves amateur radio and works in Sony Company. He's an indoor type of person too. Does your friend happen to share these interests?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"Oh! Hearing about your friend Harvey, it reminds me of another buddy of mine, who is into amateur radio as well. He works at The J.M. Smucker Company and usually spends his mornings outdoors. Perhaps you two might know each other?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Interesting indeed. It seems our circles might intersect in unexpected ways. Speaking of your friend who likes amateur radio, I do have a friend, Blake who also works at The J.M. Smucker Company. He's more of an evening person and loves dancing! Any chance your friend shares these tastes?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Funny you mention Blake, I believe one of my friends from The J.M. Smucker Co. might know him. She enjoys her mornings outdoors quilting. I wonder if Blake might have heard of her, her name's Ninfa.\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"It seems our friends do run in similar circles, don't they? Regarding Ninfa, it's quite possible, Blake may know her considering they work at the same company. In fact, Blake has a penchant for outdoor evening events, especially those involving dance. Does Ninfa share a love for dancing?\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"Dancing isn't really Ninfa's forte, she's more into peaceful and crafty hobbies like quilting. Your friend Blake should definitely join one of our quilting events in the morning, they're much fun.\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"How delightful! Perhaps Blake could learn a thing or two about quilting. It's wonderful how varied our interests can be. Thinking of peaceful hobbies, this reminded me of my friend Frank. He's fond of collecting postage cards - quite unique isn't it? He works at Ebonite International, maybe they could meet at some indoor afternoon event some time. Just curious, would this hobby intersect with Ninfa's circle?\"\n\nTurn #10: Lily Greenberg said: \"Well, Ninfa may not be into postage cards collection, but another friend of mine, Donald, likes indoor activities in the afternoon. He works at Advance Auto Parts and enjoys homebrewing, just like you do. I wouldn't be surprised if they've crossed paths at an event or two. He might be interested in meeting Frank.\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Donald, the homebrewer, sounds like a chap right up my alley. If I ever cross paths with him at an event, I'll be sure to mention Frank and his unique hobby of card collecting. After all, one never knows where shared interests might lie. It's been a pleasure conversing with you, Lily. Maybe our friends' circles overlap even more than we suspect.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, Hendrick, it's a small world after all! It's always fascinating how our circles overlap in unexpected ways. I look forward to maybe bumping into you at an event in town. Thank you for the delightful conversation.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDavid: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Christian Moerlein Brewing Company Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nLarry: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nLynn: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Cray Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nDonald: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Advance Auto Parts Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nDennis: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nJane: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Planet Hollywood Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nHarvey: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: Sony Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nNinfa: Hobby: Quilting Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nAngelica: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Planet Hollywood Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \n\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Nice to meet you, Hendrick. I couldn't help but overhear you mention something about homebrewing. It seems like quite an interesting hobby, do you have any specialties?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Thank you, Lily. Yes, homebrewing is one of my interests. I've recently been experimenting with chardonnay and malbec. Speaking of wine, I host monthly wine tastings. By any chance, do you attend any kind of tasting or hobby-events in town? Maybe we could have bumped into each other there.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"That sounds intriguing, Hendrick. You know, a great friend of mine loves homebrewing too. He's a splendid chap, spends his afternoons working for Christian Moerlein Brewing Company. I wonder if you know him, he enjoys indoor activities quite a lot.\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ah, a fellow homebrew enthusiast, nothing quite like a homemade brew, is there? That's mighty interesting, Lily. Though, I can't say I know any brewers from Christian Moerlein, I do have a friend named Harvey who loves amateur radio and works in Sony Company. He's an indoor type of person too. Does your friend happen to share these interests?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"Oh! Hearing about your friend Harvey, it reminds me of another buddy of mine, who is into amateur radio as well. He works at The J.M. Smucker Company and usually spends his mornings outdoors. Perhaps you two might know each other?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Interesting indeed. It seems our circles might intersect in unexpected ways. Speaking of your friend who likes amateur radio, I do have a friend, Blake who also works at The J.M. Smucker Company. He's more of an evening person and loves dancing! Any chance your friend shares these tastes?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Funny you mention Blake, I believe one of my friends from The J.M. Smucker Co. might know him. She enjoys her mornings outdoors quilting. I wonder if Blake might have heard of her, her name's Ninfa.\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"It seems our friends do run in similar circles, don't they? Regarding Ninfa, it's quite possible, Blake may know her considering they work at the same company. In fact, Blake has a penchant for outdoor evening events, especially those involving dance. Does Ninfa share a love for dancing?\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"Dancing isn't really Ninfa's forte, she's more into peaceful and crafty hobbies like quilting. Your friend Blake should definitely join one of our quilting events in the morning, they're much fun.\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"How delightful! Perhaps Blake could learn a thing or two about quilting. It's wonderful how varied our interests can be. Thinking of peaceful hobbies, this reminded me of my friend Frank. He's fond of collecting postage cards - quite unique isn't it? He works at Ebonite International, maybe they could meet at some indoor afternoon event some time. Just curious, would this hobby intersect with Ninfa's circle?\"\n\nTurn #10: Lily Greenberg said: \"Well, Ninfa may not be into postage cards collection, but another friend of mine, Donald, likes indoor activities in the afternoon. He works at Advance Auto Parts and enjoys homebrewing, just like you do. I wouldn't be surprised if they've crossed paths at an event or two. He might be interested in meeting Frank.\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Donald, the homebrewer, sounds like a chap right up my alley. If I ever cross paths with him at an event, I'll be sure to mention Frank and his unique hobby of card collecting. After all, one never knows where shared interests might lie. It's been a pleasure conversing with you, Lily. Maybe our friends' circles overlap even more than we suspect.\"\n\nTurn #12: Lily Greenberg said: \"Indeed, Hendrick, it's a small world after all! It's always fascinating how our circles overlap in unexpected ways. I look forward to maybe bumping into you at an event in town. Thank you for the delightful conversation.\"\n\nTurn #13: Hendrick Heinz left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMarie: Hobby: Acting Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nHarvey: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: Sony Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nFrank: Hobby: Deltiology Company: Ebonite International Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nVera: Hobby: Watching movies Company: Gentiva Health Services Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nLawrence: Hobby: Kayaking Company: Ebonite International Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nLouise: Hobby: Dancing Company: Cray Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nDallas: Hobby: Dancing Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nNancy: Hobby: Dancing Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nBlake: Hobby: Dancing Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Nice to meet you, Hendrick. I couldn't help but overhear you mention something about homebrewing. It seems like quite an interesting hobby, do you have any specialties?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Lily. Yes, homebrewing is one of my interests. I've recently been experimenting with chardonnay and malbec. Speaking of wine, I host monthly wine tastings. By any chance, do you attend any kind of tasting or hobby-events in town? Maybe we could have bumped into each other there.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMarie: Hobby: Acting Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nHarvey: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: Sony Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nFrank: Hobby: Deltiology Company: Ebonite International Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nVera: Hobby: Watching movies Company: Gentiva Health Services Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nLawrence: Hobby: Kayaking Company: Ebonite International Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nLouise: Hobby: Dancing Company: Cray Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nDallas: Hobby: Dancing Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nNancy: Hobby: Dancing Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nBlake: Hobby: Dancing Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Nice to meet you, Hendrick. I couldn't help but overhear you mention something about homebrewing. It seems like quite an interesting hobby, do you have any specialties?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Thank you, Lily. Yes, homebrewing is one of my interests. I've recently been experimenting with chardonnay and malbec. Speaking of wine, I host monthly wine tastings. By any chance, do you attend any kind of tasting or hobby-events in town? Maybe we could have bumped into each other there.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"That sounds intriguing, Hendrick. You know, a great friend of mine loves homebrewing too. He's a splendid chap, spends his afternoons working for Christian Moerlein Brewing Company. I wonder if you know him, he enjoys indoor activities quite a lot.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ah, a fellow homebrew enthusiast, nothing quite like a homemade brew, is there? That's mighty interesting, Lily. Though, I can't say I know any brewers from Christian Moerlein, I do have a friend named Harvey who loves amateur radio and works in Sony Company. He's an indoor type of person too. Does your friend happen to share these interests?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMarie: Hobby: Acting Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nHarvey: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: Sony Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nFrank: Hobby: Deltiology Company: Ebonite International Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nVera: Hobby: Watching movies Company: Gentiva Health Services Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nLawrence: Hobby: Kayaking Company: Ebonite International Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nLouise: Hobby: Dancing Company: Cray Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nDallas: Hobby: Dancing Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nNancy: Hobby: Dancing Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nBlake: Hobby: Dancing Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Nice to meet you, Hendrick. I couldn't help but overhear you mention something about homebrewing. It seems like quite an interesting hobby, do you have any specialties?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Thank you, Lily. Yes, homebrewing is one of my interests. I've recently been experimenting with chardonnay and malbec. Speaking of wine, I host monthly wine tastings. By any chance, do you attend any kind of tasting or hobby-events in town? Maybe we could have bumped into each other there.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"That sounds intriguing, Hendrick. You know, a great friend of mine loves homebrewing too. He's a splendid chap, spends his afternoons working for Christian Moerlein Brewing Company. I wonder if you know him, he enjoys indoor activities quite a lot.\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ah, a fellow homebrew enthusiast, nothing quite like a homemade brew, is there? That's mighty interesting, Lily. Though, I can't say I know any brewers from Christian Moerlein, I do have a friend named Harvey who loves amateur radio and works in Sony Company. He's an indoor type of person too. Does your friend happen to share these interests?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"Oh! Hearing about your friend Harvey, it reminds me of another buddy of mine, who is into amateur radio as well. He works at The J.M. Smucker Company and usually spends his mornings outdoors. Perhaps you two might know each other?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Interesting indeed. It seems our circles might intersect in unexpected ways. Speaking of your friend who likes amateur radio, I do have a friend, Blake who also works at The J.M. Smucker Company. He's more of an evening person and loves dancing! Any chance your friend shares these tastes?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMarie: Hobby: Acting Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nHarvey: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: Sony Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nFrank: Hobby: Deltiology Company: Ebonite International Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nVera: Hobby: Watching movies Company: Gentiva Health Services Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nLawrence: Hobby: Kayaking Company: Ebonite International Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nLouise: Hobby: Dancing Company: Cray Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nDallas: Hobby: Dancing Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nNancy: Hobby: Dancing Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nBlake: Hobby: Dancing Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Nice to meet you, Hendrick. I couldn't help but overhear you mention something about homebrewing. It seems like quite an interesting hobby, do you have any specialties?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Thank you, Lily. Yes, homebrewing is one of my interests. I've recently been experimenting with chardonnay and malbec. Speaking of wine, I host monthly wine tastings. By any chance, do you attend any kind of tasting or hobby-events in town? Maybe we could have bumped into each other there.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"That sounds intriguing, Hendrick. You know, a great friend of mine loves homebrewing too. He's a splendid chap, spends his afternoons working for Christian Moerlein Brewing Company. I wonder if you know him, he enjoys indoor activities quite a lot.\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ah, a fellow homebrew enthusiast, nothing quite like a homemade brew, is there? That's mighty interesting, Lily. Though, I can't say I know any brewers from Christian Moerlein, I do have a friend named Harvey who loves amateur radio and works in Sony Company. He's an indoor type of person too. Does your friend happen to share these interests?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"Oh! Hearing about your friend Harvey, it reminds me of another buddy of mine, who is into amateur radio as well. He works at The J.M. Smucker Company and usually spends his mornings outdoors. Perhaps you two might know each other?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Interesting indeed. It seems our circles might intersect in unexpected ways. Speaking of your friend who likes amateur radio, I do have a friend, Blake who also works at The J.M. Smucker Company. He's more of an evening person and loves dancing! Any chance your friend shares these tastes?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Funny you mention Blake, I believe one of my friends from The J.M. Smucker Co. might know him. She enjoys her mornings outdoors quilting. I wonder if Blake might have heard of her, her name's Ninfa.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"It seems our friends do run in similar circles, don't they? Regarding Ninfa, it's quite possible, Blake may know her considering they work at the same company. In fact, Blake has a penchant for outdoor evening events, especially those involving dance. Does Ninfa share a love for dancing?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMarie: Hobby: Acting Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nHarvey: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: Sony Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nFrank: Hobby: Deltiology Company: Ebonite International Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nVera: Hobby: Watching movies Company: Gentiva Health Services Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nLawrence: Hobby: Kayaking Company: Ebonite International Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nLouise: Hobby: Dancing Company: Cray Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nDallas: Hobby: Dancing Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nNancy: Hobby: Dancing Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nBlake: Hobby: Dancing Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Nice to meet you, Hendrick. I couldn't help but overhear you mention something about homebrewing. It seems like quite an interesting hobby, do you have any specialties?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Thank you, Lily. Yes, homebrewing is one of my interests. I've recently been experimenting with chardonnay and malbec. Speaking of wine, I host monthly wine tastings. By any chance, do you attend any kind of tasting or hobby-events in town? Maybe we could have bumped into each other there.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"That sounds intriguing, Hendrick. You know, a great friend of mine loves homebrewing too. He's a splendid chap, spends his afternoons working for Christian Moerlein Brewing Company. I wonder if you know him, he enjoys indoor activities quite a lot.\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ah, a fellow homebrew enthusiast, nothing quite like a homemade brew, is there? That's mighty interesting, Lily. Though, I can't say I know any brewers from Christian Moerlein, I do have a friend named Harvey who loves amateur radio and works in Sony Company. He's an indoor type of person too. Does your friend happen to share these interests?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"Oh! Hearing about your friend Harvey, it reminds me of another buddy of mine, who is into amateur radio as well. He works at The J.M. Smucker Company and usually spends his mornings outdoors. Perhaps you two might know each other?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Interesting indeed. It seems our circles might intersect in unexpected ways. Speaking of your friend who likes amateur radio, I do have a friend, Blake who also works at The J.M. Smucker Company. He's more of an evening person and loves dancing! Any chance your friend shares these tastes?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Funny you mention Blake, I believe one of my friends from The J.M. Smucker Co. might know him. She enjoys her mornings outdoors quilting. I wonder if Blake might have heard of her, her name's Ninfa.\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"It seems our friends do run in similar circles, don't they? Regarding Ninfa, it's quite possible, Blake may know her considering they work at the same company. In fact, Blake has a penchant for outdoor evening events, especially those involving dance. Does Ninfa share a love for dancing?\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"Dancing isn't really Ninfa's forte, she's more into peaceful and crafty hobbies like quilting. Your friend Blake should definitely join one of our quilting events in the morning, they're much fun.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"How delightful! Perhaps Blake could learn a thing or two about quilting. It's wonderful how varied our interests can be. Thinking of peaceful hobbies, this reminded me of my friend Frank. He's fond of collecting postage cards - quite unique isn't it? He works at Ebonite International, maybe they could meet at some indoor afternoon event some time. Just curious, would this hobby intersect with Ninfa's circle?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMarie: Hobby: Acting Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nHarvey: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: Sony Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nFrank: Hobby: Deltiology Company: Ebonite International Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nVera: Hobby: Watching movies Company: Gentiva Health Services Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nLawrence: Hobby: Kayaking Company: Ebonite International Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nLouise: Hobby: Dancing Company: Cray Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nDallas: Hobby: Dancing Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nNancy: Hobby: Dancing Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nBlake: Hobby: Dancing Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Nice to meet you, Hendrick. I couldn't help but overhear you mention something about homebrewing. It seems like quite an interesting hobby, do you have any specialties?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Thank you, Lily. Yes, homebrewing is one of my interests. I've recently been experimenting with chardonnay and malbec. Speaking of wine, I host monthly wine tastings. By any chance, do you attend any kind of tasting or hobby-events in town? Maybe we could have bumped into each other there.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"That sounds intriguing, Hendrick. You know, a great friend of mine loves homebrewing too. He's a splendid chap, spends his afternoons working for Christian Moerlein Brewing Company. I wonder if you know him, he enjoys indoor activities quite a lot.\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ah, a fellow homebrew enthusiast, nothing quite like a homemade brew, is there? That's mighty interesting, Lily. Though, I can't say I know any brewers from Christian Moerlein, I do have a friend named Harvey who loves amateur radio and works in Sony Company. He's an indoor type of person too. Does your friend happen to share these interests?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"Oh! Hearing about your friend Harvey, it reminds me of another buddy of mine, who is into amateur radio as well. He works at The J.M. Smucker Company and usually spends his mornings outdoors. Perhaps you two might know each other?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Interesting indeed. It seems our circles might intersect in unexpected ways. Speaking of your friend who likes amateur radio, I do have a friend, Blake who also works at The J.M. Smucker Company. He's more of an evening person and loves dancing! Any chance your friend shares these tastes?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Funny you mention Blake, I believe one of my friends from The J.M. Smucker Co. might know him. She enjoys her mornings outdoors quilting. I wonder if Blake might have heard of her, her name's Ninfa.\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"It seems our friends do run in similar circles, don't they? Regarding Ninfa, it's quite possible, Blake may know her considering they work at the same company. In fact, Blake has a penchant for outdoor evening events, especially those involving dance. Does Ninfa share a love for dancing?\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"Dancing isn't really Ninfa's forte, she's more into peaceful and crafty hobbies like quilting. Your friend Blake should definitely join one of our quilting events in the morning, they're much fun.\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"How delightful! Perhaps Blake could learn a thing or two about quilting. It's wonderful how varied our interests can be. Thinking of peaceful hobbies, this reminded me of my friend Frank. He's fond of collecting postage cards - quite unique isn't it? He works at Ebonite International, maybe they could meet at some indoor afternoon event some time. Just curious, would this hobby intersect with Ninfa's circle?\"\n\nTurn #10: Lily Greenberg said: \"Well, Ninfa may not be into postage cards collection, but another friend of mine, Donald, likes indoor activities in the afternoon. He works at Advance Auto Parts and enjoys homebrewing, just like you do. I wouldn't be surprised if they've crossed paths at an event or two. He might be interested in meeting Frank.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Donald, the homebrewer, sounds like a chap right up my alley. If I ever cross paths with him at an event, I'll be sure to mention Frank and his unique hobby of card collecting. After all, one never knows where shared interests might lie. It's been a pleasure conversing with you, Lily. Maybe our friends' circles overlap even more than we suspect.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMarie: Hobby: Acting Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nHarvey: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: Sony Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nFrank: Hobby: Deltiology Company: Ebonite International Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nVera: Hobby: Watching movies Company: Gentiva Health Services Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nLawrence: Hobby: Kayaking Company: Ebonite International Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nLouise: Hobby: Dancing Company: Cray Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nDallas: Hobby: Dancing Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nNancy: Hobby: Dancing Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nBlake: Hobby: Dancing Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Nice to meet you, Hendrick. I couldn't help but overhear you mention something about homebrewing. It seems like quite an interesting hobby, do you have any specialties?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Thank you, Lily. Yes, homebrewing is one of my interests. I've recently been experimenting with chardonnay and malbec. Speaking of wine, I host monthly wine tastings. By any chance, do you attend any kind of tasting or hobby-events in town? Maybe we could have bumped into each other there.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"That sounds intriguing, Hendrick. You know, a great friend of mine loves homebrewing too. He's a splendid chap, spends his afternoons working for Christian Moerlein Brewing Company. I wonder if you know him, he enjoys indoor activities quite a lot.\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ah, a fellow homebrew enthusiast, nothing quite like a homemade brew, is there? That's mighty interesting, Lily. Though, I can't say I know any brewers from Christian Moerlein, I do have a friend named Harvey who loves amateur radio and works in Sony Company. He's an indoor type of person too. Does your friend happen to share these interests?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"Oh! Hearing about your friend Harvey, it reminds me of another buddy of mine, who is into amateur radio as well. He works at The J.M. Smucker Company and usually spends his mornings outdoors. Perhaps you two might know each other?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Interesting indeed. It seems our circles might intersect in unexpected ways. Speaking of your friend who likes amateur radio, I do have a friend, Blake who also works at The J.M. Smucker Company. He's more of an evening person and loves dancing! Any chance your friend shares these tastes?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Funny you mention Blake, I believe one of my friends from The J.M. Smucker Co. might know him. She enjoys her mornings outdoors quilting. I wonder if Blake might have heard of her, her name's Ninfa.\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"It seems our friends do run in similar circles, don't they? Regarding Ninfa, it's quite possible, Blake may know her considering they work at the same company. In fact, Blake has a penchant for outdoor evening events, especially those involving dance. Does Ninfa share a love for dancing?\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"Dancing isn't really Ninfa's forte, she's more into peaceful and crafty hobbies like quilting. Your friend Blake should definitely join one of our quilting events in the morning, they're much fun.\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"How delightful! Perhaps Blake could learn a thing or two about quilting. It's wonderful how varied our interests can be. Thinking of peaceful hobbies, this reminded me of my friend Frank. He's fond of collecting postage cards - quite unique isn't it? He works at Ebonite International, maybe they could meet at some indoor afternoon event some time. Just curious, would this hobby intersect with Ninfa's circle?\"\n\nTurn #10: Lily Greenberg said: \"Well, Ninfa may not be into postage cards collection, but another friend of mine, Donald, likes indoor activities in the afternoon. He works at Advance Auto Parts and enjoys homebrewing, just like you do. I wouldn't be surprised if they've crossed paths at an event or two. He might be interested in meeting Frank.\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Donald, the homebrewer, sounds like a chap right up my alley. If I ever cross paths with him at an event, I'll be sure to mention Frank and his unique hobby of card collecting. After all, one never knows where shared interests might lie. It's been a pleasure conversing with you, Lily. Maybe our friends' circles overlap even more than we suspect.\"\n\nTurn #12: Lily Greenberg said: \"Indeed, Hendrick, it's a small world after all! It's always fascinating how our circles overlap in unexpected ways. I look forward to maybe bumping into you at an event in town. Thank you for the delightful conversation.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Lena Goodwin\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nLena Goodwin's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nGracie: School: Ithaca College Major: Mathematics Education Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nAda: School: Tulane University Major: Computer Engineering Company: Briggs & Stratton Location Preference: indoor \nSergio: School: LeTourneau University Major: Economics Company: Savers Location Preference: indoor \nWilliam: School: Eastern Michigan University Major: Ceramic Engineering Company: Xenco Medical Location Preference: indoor \nHarry: School: Creighton University Major: Computer Engineering Company: Speedway Motorsports Location Preference: indoor \nTyler: School: Columbia College Chicago Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nRichard: School: University of Dubuque Major: German Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: indoor \nRandy: School: Holy Cross College Major: Library Science Company: American Licorice Company Location Preference: indoor \nMarquerite: School: Ithaca College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nJack: School: Creighton University Major: Chinese Company: Speedway Motorsports Location Preference: outdoor \nCody: School: Metropolitan State University Major: Mathematics Education Company: LinkedIn Location Preference: indoor \nShirley: School: Augsburg College Major: Senior High Education Company: Demaco Location Preference: indoor \n\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hello there! It's a pleasure to meet you, Lena. Always nice to chitchat at these parties. Do you by any chance know Ithaca College? I have quite a few friends who studied there. Do you?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Lena Goodwin\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nLena Goodwin's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nGracie: School: Ithaca College Major: Mathematics Education Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nAda: School: Tulane University Major: Computer Engineering Company: Briggs & Stratton Location Preference: indoor \nSergio: School: LeTourneau University Major: Economics Company: Savers Location Preference: indoor \nWilliam: School: Eastern Michigan University Major: Ceramic Engineering Company: Xenco Medical Location Preference: indoor \nHarry: School: Creighton University Major: Computer Engineering Company: Speedway Motorsports Location Preference: indoor \nTyler: School: Columbia College Chicago Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nRichard: School: University of Dubuque Major: German Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: indoor \nRandy: School: Holy Cross College Major: Library Science Company: American Licorice Company Location Preference: indoor \nMarquerite: School: Ithaca College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nJack: School: Creighton University Major: Chinese Company: Speedway Motorsports Location Preference: outdoor \nCody: School: Metropolitan State University Major: Mathematics Education Company: LinkedIn Location Preference: indoor \nShirley: School: Augsburg College Major: Senior High Education Company: Demaco Location Preference: indoor \n\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello there! It's a pleasure to meet you, Lena. Always nice to chitchat at these parties. Do you by any chance know Ithaca College? I have quite a few friends who studied there. Do you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hello Lily! Yes, I do know about Ithaca College. In fact, I have a couple of friends who graduated from there. My friend Gracie majored in Mathematics Education and works at Aramark. She mainly prefers staying indoors. Another friend, Brian, majored in Asian & Pacific Area Studies and is working at Orange Micro. Do any of these details sound familiar to you?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oh, that's interesting! I also know a Gracie from Ithaca who majored in mathematics education and currently works at Aramark. It's a small world, isn't it? Do you, by chance, know anyone from Creighton University?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Lena Goodwin\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nLena Goodwin's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nGracie: School: Ithaca College Major: Mathematics Education Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nAda: School: Tulane University Major: Computer Engineering Company: Briggs & Stratton Location Preference: indoor \nSergio: School: LeTourneau University Major: Economics Company: Savers Location Preference: indoor \nWilliam: School: Eastern Michigan University Major: Ceramic Engineering Company: Xenco Medical Location Preference: indoor \nHarry: School: Creighton University Major: Computer Engineering Company: Speedway Motorsports Location Preference: indoor \nTyler: School: Columbia College Chicago Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nRichard: School: University of Dubuque Major: German Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: indoor \nRandy: School: Holy Cross College Major: Library Science Company: American Licorice Company Location Preference: indoor \nMarquerite: School: Ithaca College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nJack: School: Creighton University Major: Chinese Company: Speedway Motorsports Location Preference: outdoor \nCody: School: Metropolitan State University Major: Mathematics Education Company: LinkedIn Location Preference: indoor \nShirley: School: Augsburg College Major: Senior High Education Company: Demaco Location Preference: indoor \n\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello there! It's a pleasure to meet you, Lena. Always nice to chitchat at these parties. Do you by any chance know Ithaca College? I have quite a few friends who studied there. Do you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hello Lily! Yes, I do know about Ithaca College. In fact, I have a couple of friends who graduated from there. My friend Gracie majored in Mathematics Education and works at Aramark. She mainly prefers staying indoors. Another friend, Brian, majored in Asian & Pacific Area Studies and is working at Orange Micro. Do any of these details sound familiar to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Oh, that's interesting! I also know a Gracie from Ithaca who majored in mathematics education and currently works at Aramark. It's a small world, isn't it? Do you, by chance, know anyone from Creighton University?\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"It certainly is a small world, Lily! Unfortunately, I don't think I know anyone from Creighton University. Most of my friends attended other colleges. Does the name Aramark sound familiar to you by any chance? Several of my friends are currently working there.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Yes, Aramark is indeed a familiar name to me. Quite a few of my friends are working there. For instance, I have a friend named Tyler who pursued Middle Eastern Languages in Columbia College Chicago and now works at Aramark. Perhaps, you might know him?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Lena Goodwin\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nLena Goodwin's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nGracie: School: Ithaca College Major: Mathematics Education Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nAda: School: Tulane University Major: Computer Engineering Company: Briggs & Stratton Location Preference: indoor \nSergio: School: LeTourneau University Major: Economics Company: Savers Location Preference: indoor \nWilliam: School: Eastern Michigan University Major: Ceramic Engineering Company: Xenco Medical Location Preference: indoor \nHarry: School: Creighton University Major: Computer Engineering Company: Speedway Motorsports Location Preference: indoor \nTyler: School: Columbia College Chicago Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nRichard: School: University of Dubuque Major: German Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: indoor \nRandy: School: Holy Cross College Major: Library Science Company: American Licorice Company Location Preference: indoor \nMarquerite: School: Ithaca College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nJack: School: Creighton University Major: Chinese Company: Speedway Motorsports Location Preference: outdoor \nCody: School: Metropolitan State University Major: Mathematics Education Company: LinkedIn Location Preference: indoor \nShirley: School: Augsburg College Major: Senior High Education Company: Demaco Location Preference: indoor \n\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello there! It's a pleasure to meet you, Lena. Always nice to chitchat at these parties. Do you by any chance know Ithaca College? I have quite a few friends who studied there. Do you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hello Lily! Yes, I do know about Ithaca College. In fact, I have a couple of friends who graduated from there. My friend Gracie majored in Mathematics Education and works at Aramark. She mainly prefers staying indoors. Another friend, Brian, majored in Asian & Pacific Area Studies and is working at Orange Micro. Do any of these details sound familiar to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Oh, that's interesting! I also know a Gracie from Ithaca who majored in mathematics education and currently works at Aramark. It's a small world, isn't it? Do you, by chance, know anyone from Creighton University?\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"It certainly is a small world, Lily! Unfortunately, I don't think I know anyone from Creighton University. Most of my friends attended other colleges. Does the name Aramark sound familiar to you by any chance? Several of my friends are currently working there.\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"Yes, Aramark is indeed a familiar name to me. Quite a few of my friends are working there. For instance, I have a friend named Tyler who pursued Middle Eastern Languages in Columbia College Chicago and now works at Aramark. Perhaps, you might know him?\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"That's interesting, but I don't think I know a Tyler from Aramark. My friends Deborah and Kelly work there as well, Deborah was a Pre-Law major and Kelly studied Middle Eastern Languages. Perhaps you might know one of them?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Though Deborah and Kelly sound like delightful individuals, I can't say I know them personally. Speaking of the study of languages, I know another friend who pursued language studies. She studied German at the University of Dubuque and currently works at Illinois Tool Works. Her name is Richard. Does the name ring any bells for you?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Lena Goodwin\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nLena Goodwin's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nGracie: School: Ithaca College Major: Mathematics Education Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nAda: School: Tulane University Major: Computer Engineering Company: Briggs & Stratton Location Preference: indoor \nSergio: School: LeTourneau University Major: Economics Company: Savers Location Preference: indoor \nWilliam: School: Eastern Michigan University Major: Ceramic Engineering Company: Xenco Medical Location Preference: indoor \nHarry: School: Creighton University Major: Computer Engineering Company: Speedway Motorsports Location Preference: indoor \nTyler: School: Columbia College Chicago Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nRichard: School: University of Dubuque Major: German Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: indoor \nRandy: School: Holy Cross College Major: Library Science Company: American Licorice Company Location Preference: indoor \nMarquerite: School: Ithaca College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nJack: School: Creighton University Major: Chinese Company: Speedway Motorsports Location Preference: outdoor \nCody: School: Metropolitan State University Major: Mathematics Education Company: LinkedIn Location Preference: indoor \nShirley: School: Augsburg College Major: Senior High Education Company: Demaco Location Preference: indoor \n\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello there! It's a pleasure to meet you, Lena. Always nice to chitchat at these parties. Do you by any chance know Ithaca College? I have quite a few friends who studied there. Do you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hello Lily! Yes, I do know about Ithaca College. In fact, I have a couple of friends who graduated from there. My friend Gracie majored in Mathematics Education and works at Aramark. She mainly prefers staying indoors. Another friend, Brian, majored in Asian & Pacific Area Studies and is working at Orange Micro. Do any of these details sound familiar to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Oh, that's interesting! I also know a Gracie from Ithaca who majored in mathematics education and currently works at Aramark. It's a small world, isn't it? Do you, by chance, know anyone from Creighton University?\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"It certainly is a small world, Lily! Unfortunately, I don't think I know anyone from Creighton University. Most of my friends attended other colleges. Does the name Aramark sound familiar to you by any chance? Several of my friends are currently working there.\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"Yes, Aramark is indeed a familiar name to me. Quite a few of my friends are working there. For instance, I have a friend named Tyler who pursued Middle Eastern Languages in Columbia College Chicago and now works at Aramark. Perhaps, you might know him?\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"That's interesting, but I don't think I know a Tyler from Aramark. My friends Deborah and Kelly work there as well, Deborah was a Pre-Law major and Kelly studied Middle Eastern Languages. Perhaps you might know one of them?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Though Deborah and Kelly sound like delightful individuals, I can't say I know them personally. Speaking of the study of languages, I know another friend who pursued language studies. She studied German at the University of Dubuque and currently works at Illinois Tool Works. Her name is Richard. Does the name ring any bells for you?\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"While the name Richard does sound familiar, I'm not certain if it's the same person you're referring to as my acquaintance works at a different company. On the topic of Illinois Tool Works, however, I do have a friend named Carol who majored in Library Science and another friend, Lloyd, who majored in Geophysical Engineering. Do you perhaps know them?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm afraid I don't know Carol or Lloyd personally. However, Library Science reminds me of another friend of mine, Randy. He studied the same at Holy Cross College and currently works at the American Licorice Company. Perhaps you've crossed paths with him?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Lena Goodwin\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nLena Goodwin's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nGracie: School: Ithaca College Major: Mathematics Education Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nAda: School: Tulane University Major: Computer Engineering Company: Briggs & Stratton Location Preference: indoor \nSergio: School: LeTourneau University Major: Economics Company: Savers Location Preference: indoor \nWilliam: School: Eastern Michigan University Major: Ceramic Engineering Company: Xenco Medical Location Preference: indoor \nHarry: School: Creighton University Major: Computer Engineering Company: Speedway Motorsports Location Preference: indoor \nTyler: School: Columbia College Chicago Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nRichard: School: University of Dubuque Major: German Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: indoor \nRandy: School: Holy Cross College Major: Library Science Company: American Licorice Company Location Preference: indoor \nMarquerite: School: Ithaca College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nJack: School: Creighton University Major: Chinese Company: Speedway Motorsports Location Preference: outdoor \nCody: School: Metropolitan State University Major: Mathematics Education Company: LinkedIn Location Preference: indoor \nShirley: School: Augsburg College Major: Senior High Education Company: Demaco Location Preference: indoor \n\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello there! It's a pleasure to meet you, Lena. Always nice to chitchat at these parties. Do you by any chance know Ithaca College? I have quite a few friends who studied there. Do you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hello Lily! Yes, I do know about Ithaca College. In fact, I have a couple of friends who graduated from there. My friend Gracie majored in Mathematics Education and works at Aramark. She mainly prefers staying indoors. Another friend, Brian, majored in Asian & Pacific Area Studies and is working at Orange Micro. Do any of these details sound familiar to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Oh, that's interesting! I also know a Gracie from Ithaca who majored in mathematics education and currently works at Aramark. It's a small world, isn't it? Do you, by chance, know anyone from Creighton University?\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"It certainly is a small world, Lily! Unfortunately, I don't think I know anyone from Creighton University. Most of my friends attended other colleges. Does the name Aramark sound familiar to you by any chance? Several of my friends are currently working there.\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"Yes, Aramark is indeed a familiar name to me. Quite a few of my friends are working there. For instance, I have a friend named Tyler who pursued Middle Eastern Languages in Columbia College Chicago and now works at Aramark. Perhaps, you might know him?\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"That's interesting, but I don't think I know a Tyler from Aramark. My friends Deborah and Kelly work there as well, Deborah was a Pre-Law major and Kelly studied Middle Eastern Languages. Perhaps you might know one of them?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Though Deborah and Kelly sound like delightful individuals, I can't say I know them personally. Speaking of the study of languages, I know another friend who pursued language studies. She studied German at the University of Dubuque and currently works at Illinois Tool Works. Her name is Richard. Does the name ring any bells for you?\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"While the name Richard does sound familiar, I'm not certain if it's the same person you're referring to as my acquaintance works at a different company. On the topic of Illinois Tool Works, however, I do have a friend named Carol who majored in Library Science and another friend, Lloyd, who majored in Geophysical Engineering. Do you perhaps know them?\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"I'm afraid I don't know Carol or Lloyd personally. However, Library Science reminds me of another friend of mine, Randy. He studied the same at Holy Cross College and currently works at the American Licorice Company. Perhaps you've crossed paths with him?\"\n\nTurn #9: Lena Goodwin said: \"I'm afraid I don't know a Randy from Holy Cross College. But it's fascinating how we both have friends who majored in Library Science. Speaking of which, my friend Herman also pursued Library Science and is currently employed at Mesa Airlines. Does Herman's name sound familiar to you?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Herman doesn't ring a bell, Lena. But since we're on the topic of Mesa Airlines, I have a friend named Cody who works for LinkedIn, but had majored in Mathematics Education at Metropolitan State University. Could it be that you've met him before?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Lena Goodwin\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nLena Goodwin's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nGracie: School: Ithaca College Major: Mathematics Education Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nAda: School: Tulane University Major: Computer Engineering Company: Briggs & Stratton Location Preference: indoor \nSergio: School: LeTourneau University Major: Economics Company: Savers Location Preference: indoor \nWilliam: School: Eastern Michigan University Major: Ceramic Engineering Company: Xenco Medical Location Preference: indoor \nHarry: School: Creighton University Major: Computer Engineering Company: Speedway Motorsports Location Preference: indoor \nTyler: School: Columbia College Chicago Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nRichard: School: University of Dubuque Major: German Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: indoor \nRandy: School: Holy Cross College Major: Library Science Company: American Licorice Company Location Preference: indoor \nMarquerite: School: Ithaca College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nJack: School: Creighton University Major: Chinese Company: Speedway Motorsports Location Preference: outdoor \nCody: School: Metropolitan State University Major: Mathematics Education Company: LinkedIn Location Preference: indoor \nShirley: School: Augsburg College Major: Senior High Education Company: Demaco Location Preference: indoor \n\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello there! It's a pleasure to meet you, Lena. Always nice to chitchat at these parties. Do you by any chance know Ithaca College? I have quite a few friends who studied there. Do you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hello Lily! Yes, I do know about Ithaca College. In fact, I have a couple of friends who graduated from there. My friend Gracie majored in Mathematics Education and works at Aramark. She mainly prefers staying indoors. Another friend, Brian, majored in Asian & Pacific Area Studies and is working at Orange Micro. Do any of these details sound familiar to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Oh, that's interesting! I also know a Gracie from Ithaca who majored in mathematics education and currently works at Aramark. It's a small world, isn't it? Do you, by chance, know anyone from Creighton University?\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"It certainly is a small world, Lily! Unfortunately, I don't think I know anyone from Creighton University. Most of my friends attended other colleges. Does the name Aramark sound familiar to you by any chance? Several of my friends are currently working there.\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"Yes, Aramark is indeed a familiar name to me. Quite a few of my friends are working there. For instance, I have a friend named Tyler who pursued Middle Eastern Languages in Columbia College Chicago and now works at Aramark. Perhaps, you might know him?\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"That's interesting, but I don't think I know a Tyler from Aramark. My friends Deborah and Kelly work there as well, Deborah was a Pre-Law major and Kelly studied Middle Eastern Languages. Perhaps you might know one of them?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Though Deborah and Kelly sound like delightful individuals, I can't say I know them personally. Speaking of the study of languages, I know another friend who pursued language studies. She studied German at the University of Dubuque and currently works at Illinois Tool Works. Her name is Richard. Does the name ring any bells for you?\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"While the name Richard does sound familiar, I'm not certain if it's the same person you're referring to as my acquaintance works at a different company. On the topic of Illinois Tool Works, however, I do have a friend named Carol who majored in Library Science and another friend, Lloyd, who majored in Geophysical Engineering. Do you perhaps know them?\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"I'm afraid I don't know Carol or Lloyd personally. However, Library Science reminds me of another friend of mine, Randy. He studied the same at Holy Cross College and currently works at the American Licorice Company. Perhaps you've crossed paths with him?\"\n\nTurn #9: Lena Goodwin said: \"I'm afraid I don't know a Randy from Holy Cross College. But it's fascinating how we both have friends who majored in Library Science. Speaking of which, my friend Herman also pursued Library Science and is currently employed at Mesa Airlines. Does Herman's name sound familiar to you?\"\n\nTurn #10: Lily Greenberg said: \"Herman doesn't ring a bell, Lena. But since we're on the topic of Mesa Airlines, I have a friend named Cody who works for LinkedIn, but had majored in Mathematics Education at Metropolitan State University. Could it be that you've met him before?\"\n\nTurn #11: Lena Goodwin said: \"I'm afraid I don't know a Cody from LinkedIn. Although, relating to Mathematics Education, my friend Gracie from Ithaca College pursued the same field and is currently working at Aramark. Perhaps you're acquainted with her?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, we have already established our mutual connection through Gracie. It's fascinating how friendships weave such interconnected webs, isn't it? Have you by chance heard of a company called Speedway Motorsports? I have a friend named Harry who studied Computer Engineering at Creighton University and now works there.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Lena Goodwin\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nLena Goodwin's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nGracie: School: Ithaca College Major: Mathematics Education Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nAda: School: Tulane University Major: Computer Engineering Company: Briggs & Stratton Location Preference: indoor \nSergio: School: LeTourneau University Major: Economics Company: Savers Location Preference: indoor \nWilliam: School: Eastern Michigan University Major: Ceramic Engineering Company: Xenco Medical Location Preference: indoor \nHarry: School: Creighton University Major: Computer Engineering Company: Speedway Motorsports Location Preference: indoor \nTyler: School: Columbia College Chicago Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nRichard: School: University of Dubuque Major: German Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: indoor \nRandy: School: Holy Cross College Major: Library Science Company: American Licorice Company Location Preference: indoor \nMarquerite: School: Ithaca College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nJack: School: Creighton University Major: Chinese Company: Speedway Motorsports Location Preference: outdoor \nCody: School: Metropolitan State University Major: Mathematics Education Company: LinkedIn Location Preference: indoor \nShirley: School: Augsburg College Major: Senior High Education Company: Demaco Location Preference: indoor \n\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello there! It's a pleasure to meet you, Lena. Always nice to chitchat at these parties. Do you by any chance know Ithaca College? I have quite a few friends who studied there. Do you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hello Lily! Yes, I do know about Ithaca College. In fact, I have a couple of friends who graduated from there. My friend Gracie majored in Mathematics Education and works at Aramark. She mainly prefers staying indoors. Another friend, Brian, majored in Asian & Pacific Area Studies and is working at Orange Micro. Do any of these details sound familiar to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Oh, that's interesting! I also know a Gracie from Ithaca who majored in mathematics education and currently works at Aramark. It's a small world, isn't it? Do you, by chance, know anyone from Creighton University?\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"It certainly is a small world, Lily! Unfortunately, I don't think I know anyone from Creighton University. Most of my friends attended other colleges. Does the name Aramark sound familiar to you by any chance? Several of my friends are currently working there.\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"Yes, Aramark is indeed a familiar name to me. Quite a few of my friends are working there. For instance, I have a friend named Tyler who pursued Middle Eastern Languages in Columbia College Chicago and now works at Aramark. Perhaps, you might know him?\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"That's interesting, but I don't think I know a Tyler from Aramark. My friends Deborah and Kelly work there as well, Deborah was a Pre-Law major and Kelly studied Middle Eastern Languages. Perhaps you might know one of them?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Though Deborah and Kelly sound like delightful individuals, I can't say I know them personally. Speaking of the study of languages, I know another friend who pursued language studies. She studied German at the University of Dubuque and currently works at Illinois Tool Works. Her name is Richard. Does the name ring any bells for you?\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"While the name Richard does sound familiar, I'm not certain if it's the same person you're referring to as my acquaintance works at a different company. On the topic of Illinois Tool Works, however, I do have a friend named Carol who majored in Library Science and another friend, Lloyd, who majored in Geophysical Engineering. Do you perhaps know them?\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"I'm afraid I don't know Carol or Lloyd personally. However, Library Science reminds me of another friend of mine, Randy. He studied the same at Holy Cross College and currently works at the American Licorice Company. Perhaps you've crossed paths with him?\"\n\nTurn #9: Lena Goodwin said: \"I'm afraid I don't know a Randy from Holy Cross College. But it's fascinating how we both have friends who majored in Library Science. Speaking of which, my friend Herman also pursued Library Science and is currently employed at Mesa Airlines. Does Herman's name sound familiar to you?\"\n\nTurn #10: Lily Greenberg said: \"Herman doesn't ring a bell, Lena. But since we're on the topic of Mesa Airlines, I have a friend named Cody who works for LinkedIn, but had majored in Mathematics Education at Metropolitan State University. Could it be that you've met him before?\"\n\nTurn #11: Lena Goodwin said: \"I'm afraid I don't know a Cody from LinkedIn. Although, relating to Mathematics Education, my friend Gracie from Ithaca College pursued the same field and is currently working at Aramark. Perhaps you're acquainted with her?\"\n\nTurn #12: Lily Greenberg said: \"Indeed, we have already established our mutual connection through Gracie. It's fascinating how friendships weave such interconnected webs, isn't it? Have you by chance heard of a company called Speedway Motorsports? I have a friend named Harry who studied Computer Engineering at Creighton University and now works there.\"\n\nTurn #13: Lena Goodwin said: \"I can't say that I've heard of Speedway Motorsports, and I don't know Harry either, unfortunately. The focus of my social circle seems to be rather different. Nonetheless, it has been quite interesting to discover these possible connections through our conversation, hasn't it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, Lena, it's been very enlightening to discover these web-like connections. Sometimes, we don't realize how intertwined our paths are. It's been a pleasure conversing with you. I look forward to seeing our social circles intertwine more in the future.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Lena Goodwin\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nLena Goodwin's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nGracie: School: Ithaca College Major: Mathematics Education Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nAda: School: Tulane University Major: Computer Engineering Company: Briggs & Stratton Location Preference: indoor \nSergio: School: LeTourneau University Major: Economics Company: Savers Location Preference: indoor \nWilliam: School: Eastern Michigan University Major: Ceramic Engineering Company: Xenco Medical Location Preference: indoor \nHarry: School: Creighton University Major: Computer Engineering Company: Speedway Motorsports Location Preference: indoor \nTyler: School: Columbia College Chicago Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nRichard: School: University of Dubuque Major: German Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: indoor \nRandy: School: Holy Cross College Major: Library Science Company: American Licorice Company Location Preference: indoor \nMarquerite: School: Ithaca College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nJack: School: Creighton University Major: Chinese Company: Speedway Motorsports Location Preference: outdoor \nCody: School: Metropolitan State University Major: Mathematics Education Company: LinkedIn Location Preference: indoor \nShirley: School: Augsburg College Major: Senior High Education Company: Demaco Location Preference: indoor \n\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello there! It's a pleasure to meet you, Lena. Always nice to chitchat at these parties. Do you by any chance know Ithaca College? I have quite a few friends who studied there. Do you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hello Lily! Yes, I do know about Ithaca College. In fact, I have a couple of friends who graduated from there. My friend Gracie majored in Mathematics Education and works at Aramark. She mainly prefers staying indoors. Another friend, Brian, majored in Asian & Pacific Area Studies and is working at Orange Micro. Do any of these details sound familiar to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Oh, that's interesting! I also know a Gracie from Ithaca who majored in mathematics education and currently works at Aramark. It's a small world, isn't it? Do you, by chance, know anyone from Creighton University?\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"It certainly is a small world, Lily! Unfortunately, I don't think I know anyone from Creighton University. Most of my friends attended other colleges. Does the name Aramark sound familiar to you by any chance? Several of my friends are currently working there.\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"Yes, Aramark is indeed a familiar name to me. Quite a few of my friends are working there. For instance, I have a friend named Tyler who pursued Middle Eastern Languages in Columbia College Chicago and now works at Aramark. Perhaps, you might know him?\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"That's interesting, but I don't think I know a Tyler from Aramark. My friends Deborah and Kelly work there as well, Deborah was a Pre-Law major and Kelly studied Middle Eastern Languages. Perhaps you might know one of them?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Though Deborah and Kelly sound like delightful individuals, I can't say I know them personally. Speaking of the study of languages, I know another friend who pursued language studies. She studied German at the University of Dubuque and currently works at Illinois Tool Works. Her name is Richard. Does the name ring any bells for you?\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"While the name Richard does sound familiar, I'm not certain if it's the same person you're referring to as my acquaintance works at a different company. On the topic of Illinois Tool Works, however, I do have a friend named Carol who majored in Library Science and another friend, Lloyd, who majored in Geophysical Engineering. Do you perhaps know them?\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"I'm afraid I don't know Carol or Lloyd personally. However, Library Science reminds me of another friend of mine, Randy. He studied the same at Holy Cross College and currently works at the American Licorice Company. Perhaps you've crossed paths with him?\"\n\nTurn #9: Lena Goodwin said: \"I'm afraid I don't know a Randy from Holy Cross College. But it's fascinating how we both have friends who majored in Library Science. Speaking of which, my friend Herman also pursued Library Science and is currently employed at Mesa Airlines. Does Herman's name sound familiar to you?\"\n\nTurn #10: Lily Greenberg said: \"Herman doesn't ring a bell, Lena. But since we're on the topic of Mesa Airlines, I have a friend named Cody who works for LinkedIn, but had majored in Mathematics Education at Metropolitan State University. Could it be that you've met him before?\"\n\nTurn #11: Lena Goodwin said: \"I'm afraid I don't know a Cody from LinkedIn. Although, relating to Mathematics Education, my friend Gracie from Ithaca College pursued the same field and is currently working at Aramark. Perhaps you're acquainted with her?\"\n\nTurn #12: Lily Greenberg said: \"Indeed, we have already established our mutual connection through Gracie. It's fascinating how friendships weave such interconnected webs, isn't it? Have you by chance heard of a company called Speedway Motorsports? I have a friend named Harry who studied Computer Engineering at Creighton University and now works there.\"\n\nTurn #13: Lena Goodwin said: \"I can't say that I've heard of Speedway Motorsports, and I don't know Harry either, unfortunately. The focus of my social circle seems to be rather different. Nonetheless, it has been quite interesting to discover these possible connections through our conversation, hasn't it?\"\n\nTurn #14: Lily Greenberg said: \"Indeed, Lena, it's been very enlightening to discover these web-like connections. Sometimes, we don't realize how intertwined our paths are. It's been a pleasure conversing with you. I look forward to seeing our social circles intertwine more in the future.\"\n\nTurn #15: Lena Goodwin said: \"Absolutely, Lily. The intricate web of connections we share through our friends truly is fascinating. It was a pleasure on my end as well to have this conversation. Let's definitely make it a point to connect more in the future.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Lena Goodwin\nLily Greenberg's background: \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nKathleen: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Greek Company: Demaco Location Preference: indoor \nCarol: School: Hood College Major: Library Science Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: outdoor \nHerman: School: University of Puget Sound Major: Library Science Company: Mesa Airlines Location Preference: indoor \nMatthew: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Asian & Pacific Area Studies Company: Savers Location Preference: indoor \nMark: School: University of Arkansas - Monticello Major: Economics Company: Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Location Preference: outdoor \nDeborah: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Pre-Law Company: Aramark Location Preference: outdoor \nKelly: School: Hood College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Mesa Airlines Location Preference: outdoor \nGracie: School: Ithaca College Major: Mathematics Education Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nEtta: School: University of Arkansas - Monticello Major: Judaism & Jewish Studies Company: Aramark Location Preference: outdoor \nNatasha: School: Thomas Edison State College Major: Linguistics Company: Invacare Corporation Location Preference: outdoor \nLloyd: School: Eastern Michigan University Major: Geophysical Engineering Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: outdoor \nBrian: School: Ithaca College Major: Asian & Pacific Area Studies Company: Orange Micro Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello there! It's a pleasure to meet you, Lena. Always nice to chitchat at these parties. Do you by any chance know Ithaca College? I have quite a few friends who studied there. Do you?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Hello Lily! Yes, I do know about Ithaca College. In fact, I have a couple of friends who graduated from there. My friend Gracie majored in Mathematics Education and works at Aramark. She mainly prefers staying indoors. Another friend, Brian, majored in Asian & Pacific Area Studies and is working at Orange Micro. Do any of these details sound familiar to you?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Lena Goodwin\nLily Greenberg's background: \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nKathleen: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Greek Company: Demaco Location Preference: indoor \nCarol: School: Hood College Major: Library Science Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: outdoor \nHerman: School: University of Puget Sound Major: Library Science Company: Mesa Airlines Location Preference: indoor \nMatthew: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Asian & Pacific Area Studies Company: Savers Location Preference: indoor \nMark: School: University of Arkansas - Monticello Major: Economics Company: Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Location Preference: outdoor \nDeborah: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Pre-Law Company: Aramark Location Preference: outdoor \nKelly: School: Hood College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Mesa Airlines Location Preference: outdoor \nGracie: School: Ithaca College Major: Mathematics Education Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nEtta: School: University of Arkansas - Monticello Major: Judaism & Jewish Studies Company: Aramark Location Preference: outdoor \nNatasha: School: Thomas Edison State College Major: Linguistics Company: Invacare Corporation Location Preference: outdoor \nLloyd: School: Eastern Michigan University Major: Geophysical Engineering Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: outdoor \nBrian: School: Ithaca College Major: Asian & Pacific Area Studies Company: Orange Micro Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello there! It's a pleasure to meet you, Lena. Always nice to chitchat at these parties. Do you by any chance know Ithaca College? I have quite a few friends who studied there. Do you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hello Lily! Yes, I do know about Ithaca College. In fact, I have a couple of friends who graduated from there. My friend Gracie majored in Mathematics Education and works at Aramark. She mainly prefers staying indoors. Another friend, Brian, majored in Asian & Pacific Area Studies and is working at Orange Micro. Do any of these details sound familiar to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Oh, that's interesting! I also know a Gracie from Ithaca who majored in mathematics education and currently works at Aramark. It's a small world, isn't it? Do you, by chance, know anyone from Creighton University?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"It certainly is a small world, Lily! Unfortunately, I don't think I know anyone from Creighton University. Most of my friends attended other colleges. Does the name Aramark sound familiar to you by any chance? Several of my friends are currently working there.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Lena Goodwin\nLily Greenberg's background: \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nKathleen: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Greek Company: Demaco Location Preference: indoor \nCarol: School: Hood College Major: Library Science Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: outdoor \nHerman: School: University of Puget Sound Major: Library Science Company: Mesa Airlines Location Preference: indoor \nMatthew: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Asian & Pacific Area Studies Company: Savers Location Preference: indoor \nMark: School: University of Arkansas - Monticello Major: Economics Company: Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Location Preference: outdoor \nDeborah: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Pre-Law Company: Aramark Location Preference: outdoor \nKelly: School: Hood College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Mesa Airlines Location Preference: outdoor \nGracie: School: Ithaca College Major: Mathematics Education Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nEtta: School: University of Arkansas - Monticello Major: Judaism & Jewish Studies Company: Aramark Location Preference: outdoor \nNatasha: School: Thomas Edison State College Major: Linguistics Company: Invacare Corporation Location Preference: outdoor \nLloyd: School: Eastern Michigan University Major: Geophysical Engineering Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: outdoor \nBrian: School: Ithaca College Major: Asian & Pacific Area Studies Company: Orange Micro Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello there! It's a pleasure to meet you, Lena. Always nice to chitchat at these parties. Do you by any chance know Ithaca College? I have quite a few friends who studied there. Do you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hello Lily! Yes, I do know about Ithaca College. In fact, I have a couple of friends who graduated from there. My friend Gracie majored in Mathematics Education and works at Aramark. She mainly prefers staying indoors. Another friend, Brian, majored in Asian & Pacific Area Studies and is working at Orange Micro. Do any of these details sound familiar to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Oh, that's interesting! I also know a Gracie from Ithaca who majored in mathematics education and currently works at Aramark. It's a small world, isn't it? Do you, by chance, know anyone from Creighton University?\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"It certainly is a small world, Lily! Unfortunately, I don't think I know anyone from Creighton University. Most of my friends attended other colleges. Does the name Aramark sound familiar to you by any chance? Several of my friends are currently working there.\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"Yes, Aramark is indeed a familiar name to me. Quite a few of my friends are working there. For instance, I have a friend named Tyler who pursued Middle Eastern Languages in Columbia College Chicago and now works at Aramark. Perhaps, you might know him?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's interesting, but I don't think I know a Tyler from Aramark. My friends Deborah and Kelly work there as well, Deborah was a Pre-Law major and Kelly studied Middle Eastern Languages. Perhaps you might know one of them?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Lena Goodwin\nLily Greenberg's background: \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nKathleen: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Greek Company: Demaco Location Preference: indoor \nCarol: School: Hood College Major: Library Science Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: outdoor \nHerman: School: University of Puget Sound Major: Library Science Company: Mesa Airlines Location Preference: indoor \nMatthew: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Asian & Pacific Area Studies Company: Savers Location Preference: indoor \nMark: School: University of Arkansas - Monticello Major: Economics Company: Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Location Preference: outdoor \nDeborah: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Pre-Law Company: Aramark Location Preference: outdoor \nKelly: School: Hood College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Mesa Airlines Location Preference: outdoor \nGracie: School: Ithaca College Major: Mathematics Education Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nEtta: School: University of Arkansas - Monticello Major: Judaism & Jewish Studies Company: Aramark Location Preference: outdoor \nNatasha: School: Thomas Edison State College Major: Linguistics Company: Invacare Corporation Location Preference: outdoor \nLloyd: School: Eastern Michigan University Major: Geophysical Engineering Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: outdoor \nBrian: School: Ithaca College Major: Asian & Pacific Area Studies Company: Orange Micro Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello there! It's a pleasure to meet you, Lena. Always nice to chitchat at these parties. Do you by any chance know Ithaca College? I have quite a few friends who studied there. Do you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hello Lily! Yes, I do know about Ithaca College. In fact, I have a couple of friends who graduated from there. My friend Gracie majored in Mathematics Education and works at Aramark. She mainly prefers staying indoors. Another friend, Brian, majored in Asian & Pacific Area Studies and is working at Orange Micro. Do any of these details sound familiar to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Oh, that's interesting! I also know a Gracie from Ithaca who majored in mathematics education and currently works at Aramark. It's a small world, isn't it? Do you, by chance, know anyone from Creighton University?\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"It certainly is a small world, Lily! Unfortunately, I don't think I know anyone from Creighton University. Most of my friends attended other colleges. Does the name Aramark sound familiar to you by any chance? Several of my friends are currently working there.\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"Yes, Aramark is indeed a familiar name to me. Quite a few of my friends are working there. For instance, I have a friend named Tyler who pursued Middle Eastern Languages in Columbia College Chicago and now works at Aramark. Perhaps, you might know him?\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"That's interesting, but I don't think I know a Tyler from Aramark. My friends Deborah and Kelly work there as well, Deborah was a Pre-Law major and Kelly studied Middle Eastern Languages. Perhaps you might know one of them?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Though Deborah and Kelly sound like delightful individuals, I can't say I know them personally. Speaking of the study of languages, I know another friend who pursued language studies. She studied German at the University of Dubuque and currently works at Illinois Tool Works. Her name is Richard. Does the name ring any bells for you?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"While the name Richard does sound familiar, I'm not certain if it's the same person you're referring to as my acquaintance works at a different company. On the topic of Illinois Tool Works, however, I do have a friend named Carol who majored in Library Science and another friend, Lloyd, who majored in Geophysical Engineering. Do you perhaps know them?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Lena Goodwin\nLily Greenberg's background: \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nKathleen: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Greek Company: Demaco Location Preference: indoor \nCarol: School: Hood College Major: Library Science Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: outdoor \nHerman: School: University of Puget Sound Major: Library Science Company: Mesa Airlines Location Preference: indoor \nMatthew: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Asian & Pacific Area Studies Company: Savers Location Preference: indoor \nMark: School: University of Arkansas - Monticello Major: Economics Company: Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Location Preference: outdoor \nDeborah: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Pre-Law Company: Aramark Location Preference: outdoor \nKelly: School: Hood College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Mesa Airlines Location Preference: outdoor \nGracie: School: Ithaca College Major: Mathematics Education Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nEtta: School: University of Arkansas - Monticello Major: Judaism & Jewish Studies Company: Aramark Location Preference: outdoor \nNatasha: School: Thomas Edison State College Major: Linguistics Company: Invacare Corporation Location Preference: outdoor \nLloyd: School: Eastern Michigan University Major: Geophysical Engineering Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: outdoor \nBrian: School: Ithaca College Major: Asian & Pacific Area Studies Company: Orange Micro Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello there! It's a pleasure to meet you, Lena. Always nice to chitchat at these parties. Do you by any chance know Ithaca College? I have quite a few friends who studied there. Do you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hello Lily! Yes, I do know about Ithaca College. In fact, I have a couple of friends who graduated from there. My friend Gracie majored in Mathematics Education and works at Aramark. She mainly prefers staying indoors. Another friend, Brian, majored in Asian & Pacific Area Studies and is working at Orange Micro. Do any of these details sound familiar to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Oh, that's interesting! I also know a Gracie from Ithaca who majored in mathematics education and currently works at Aramark. It's a small world, isn't it? Do you, by chance, know anyone from Creighton University?\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"It certainly is a small world, Lily! Unfortunately, I don't think I know anyone from Creighton University. Most of my friends attended other colleges. Does the name Aramark sound familiar to you by any chance? Several of my friends are currently working there.\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"Yes, Aramark is indeed a familiar name to me. Quite a few of my friends are working there. For instance, I have a friend named Tyler who pursued Middle Eastern Languages in Columbia College Chicago and now works at Aramark. Perhaps, you might know him?\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"That's interesting, but I don't think I know a Tyler from Aramark. My friends Deborah and Kelly work there as well, Deborah was a Pre-Law major and Kelly studied Middle Eastern Languages. Perhaps you might know one of them?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Though Deborah and Kelly sound like delightful individuals, I can't say I know them personally. Speaking of the study of languages, I know another friend who pursued language studies. She studied German at the University of Dubuque and currently works at Illinois Tool Works. Her name is Richard. Does the name ring any bells for you?\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"While the name Richard does sound familiar, I'm not certain if it's the same person you're referring to as my acquaintance works at a different company. On the topic of Illinois Tool Works, however, I do have a friend named Carol who majored in Library Science and another friend, Lloyd, who majored in Geophysical Engineering. Do you perhaps know them?\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"I'm afraid I don't know Carol or Lloyd personally. However, Library Science reminds me of another friend of mine, Randy. He studied the same at Holy Cross College and currently works at the American Licorice Company. Perhaps you've crossed paths with him?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm afraid I don't know a Randy from Holy Cross College. But it's fascinating how we both have friends who majored in Library Science. Speaking of which, my friend Herman also pursued Library Science and is currently employed at Mesa Airlines. Does Herman's name sound familiar to you?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Lena Goodwin\nLily Greenberg's background: \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nKathleen: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Greek Company: Demaco Location Preference: indoor \nCarol: School: Hood College Major: Library Science Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: outdoor \nHerman: School: University of Puget Sound Major: Library Science Company: Mesa Airlines Location Preference: indoor \nMatthew: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Asian & Pacific Area Studies Company: Savers Location Preference: indoor \nMark: School: University of Arkansas - Monticello Major: Economics Company: Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Location Preference: outdoor \nDeborah: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Pre-Law Company: Aramark Location Preference: outdoor \nKelly: School: Hood College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Mesa Airlines Location Preference: outdoor \nGracie: School: Ithaca College Major: Mathematics Education Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nEtta: School: University of Arkansas - Monticello Major: Judaism & Jewish Studies Company: Aramark Location Preference: outdoor \nNatasha: School: Thomas Edison State College Major: Linguistics Company: Invacare Corporation Location Preference: outdoor \nLloyd: School: Eastern Michigan University Major: Geophysical Engineering Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: outdoor \nBrian: School: Ithaca College Major: Asian & Pacific Area Studies Company: Orange Micro Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello there! It's a pleasure to meet you, Lena. Always nice to chitchat at these parties. Do you by any chance know Ithaca College? I have quite a few friends who studied there. Do you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hello Lily! Yes, I do know about Ithaca College. In fact, I have a couple of friends who graduated from there. My friend Gracie majored in Mathematics Education and works at Aramark. She mainly prefers staying indoors. Another friend, Brian, majored in Asian & Pacific Area Studies and is working at Orange Micro. Do any of these details sound familiar to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Oh, that's interesting! I also know a Gracie from Ithaca who majored in mathematics education and currently works at Aramark. It's a small world, isn't it? Do you, by chance, know anyone from Creighton University?\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"It certainly is a small world, Lily! Unfortunately, I don't think I know anyone from Creighton University. Most of my friends attended other colleges. Does the name Aramark sound familiar to you by any chance? Several of my friends are currently working there.\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"Yes, Aramark is indeed a familiar name to me. Quite a few of my friends are working there. For instance, I have a friend named Tyler who pursued Middle Eastern Languages in Columbia College Chicago and now works at Aramark. Perhaps, you might know him?\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"That's interesting, but I don't think I know a Tyler from Aramark. My friends Deborah and Kelly work there as well, Deborah was a Pre-Law major and Kelly studied Middle Eastern Languages. Perhaps you might know one of them?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Though Deborah and Kelly sound like delightful individuals, I can't say I know them personally. Speaking of the study of languages, I know another friend who pursued language studies. She studied German at the University of Dubuque and currently works at Illinois Tool Works. Her name is Richard. Does the name ring any bells for you?\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"While the name Richard does sound familiar, I'm not certain if it's the same person you're referring to as my acquaintance works at a different company. On the topic of Illinois Tool Works, however, I do have a friend named Carol who majored in Library Science and another friend, Lloyd, who majored in Geophysical Engineering. Do you perhaps know them?\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"I'm afraid I don't know Carol or Lloyd personally. However, Library Science reminds me of another friend of mine, Randy. He studied the same at Holy Cross College and currently works at the American Licorice Company. Perhaps you've crossed paths with him?\"\n\nTurn #9: Lena Goodwin said: \"I'm afraid I don't know a Randy from Holy Cross College. But it's fascinating how we both have friends who majored in Library Science. Speaking of which, my friend Herman also pursued Library Science and is currently employed at Mesa Airlines. Does Herman's name sound familiar to you?\"\n\nTurn #10: Lily Greenberg said: \"Herman doesn't ring a bell, Lena. But since we're on the topic of Mesa Airlines, I have a friend named Cody who works for LinkedIn, but had majored in Mathematics Education at Metropolitan State University. Could it be that you've met him before?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm afraid I don't know a Cody from LinkedIn. Although, relating to Mathematics Education, my friend Gracie from Ithaca College pursued the same field and is currently working at Aramark. Perhaps you're acquainted with her?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Lena Goodwin\nLily Greenberg's background: \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nKathleen: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Greek Company: Demaco Location Preference: indoor \nCarol: School: Hood College Major: Library Science Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: outdoor \nHerman: School: University of Puget Sound Major: Library Science Company: Mesa Airlines Location Preference: indoor \nMatthew: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Asian & Pacific Area Studies Company: Savers Location Preference: indoor \nMark: School: University of Arkansas - Monticello Major: Economics Company: Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Location Preference: outdoor \nDeborah: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Pre-Law Company: Aramark Location Preference: outdoor \nKelly: School: Hood College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Mesa Airlines Location Preference: outdoor \nGracie: School: Ithaca College Major: Mathematics Education Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nEtta: School: University of Arkansas - Monticello Major: Judaism & Jewish Studies Company: Aramark Location Preference: outdoor \nNatasha: School: Thomas Edison State College Major: Linguistics Company: Invacare Corporation Location Preference: outdoor \nLloyd: School: Eastern Michigan University Major: Geophysical Engineering Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: outdoor \nBrian: School: Ithaca College Major: Asian & Pacific Area Studies Company: Orange Micro Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello there! It's a pleasure to meet you, Lena. Always nice to chitchat at these parties. Do you by any chance know Ithaca College? I have quite a few friends who studied there. Do you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hello Lily! Yes, I do know about Ithaca College. In fact, I have a couple of friends who graduated from there. My friend Gracie majored in Mathematics Education and works at Aramark. She mainly prefers staying indoors. Another friend, Brian, majored in Asian & Pacific Area Studies and is working at Orange Micro. Do any of these details sound familiar to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Oh, that's interesting! I also know a Gracie from Ithaca who majored in mathematics education and currently works at Aramark. It's a small world, isn't it? Do you, by chance, know anyone from Creighton University?\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"It certainly is a small world, Lily! Unfortunately, I don't think I know anyone from Creighton University. Most of my friends attended other colleges. Does the name Aramark sound familiar to you by any chance? Several of my friends are currently working there.\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"Yes, Aramark is indeed a familiar name to me. Quite a few of my friends are working there. For instance, I have a friend named Tyler who pursued Middle Eastern Languages in Columbia College Chicago and now works at Aramark. Perhaps, you might know him?\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"That's interesting, but I don't think I know a Tyler from Aramark. My friends Deborah and Kelly work there as well, Deborah was a Pre-Law major and Kelly studied Middle Eastern Languages. Perhaps you might know one of them?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Though Deborah and Kelly sound like delightful individuals, I can't say I know them personally. Speaking of the study of languages, I know another friend who pursued language studies. She studied German at the University of Dubuque and currently works at Illinois Tool Works. Her name is Richard. Does the name ring any bells for you?\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"While the name Richard does sound familiar, I'm not certain if it's the same person you're referring to as my acquaintance works at a different company. On the topic of Illinois Tool Works, however, I do have a friend named Carol who majored in Library Science and another friend, Lloyd, who majored in Geophysical Engineering. Do you perhaps know them?\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"I'm afraid I don't know Carol or Lloyd personally. However, Library Science reminds me of another friend of mine, Randy. He studied the same at Holy Cross College and currently works at the American Licorice Company. Perhaps you've crossed paths with him?\"\n\nTurn #9: Lena Goodwin said: \"I'm afraid I don't know a Randy from Holy Cross College. But it's fascinating how we both have friends who majored in Library Science. Speaking of which, my friend Herman also pursued Library Science and is currently employed at Mesa Airlines. Does Herman's name sound familiar to you?\"\n\nTurn #10: Lily Greenberg said: \"Herman doesn't ring a bell, Lena. But since we're on the topic of Mesa Airlines, I have a friend named Cody who works for LinkedIn, but had majored in Mathematics Education at Metropolitan State University. Could it be that you've met him before?\"\n\nTurn #11: Lena Goodwin said: \"I'm afraid I don't know a Cody from LinkedIn. Although, relating to Mathematics Education, my friend Gracie from Ithaca College pursued the same field and is currently working at Aramark. Perhaps you're acquainted with her?\"\n\nTurn #12: Lily Greenberg said: \"Indeed, we have already established our mutual connection through Gracie. It's fascinating how friendships weave such interconnected webs, isn't it? Have you by chance heard of a company called Speedway Motorsports? I have a friend named Harry who studied Computer Engineering at Creighton University and now works there.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I can't say that I've heard of Speedway Motorsports, and I don't know Harry either, unfortunately. The focus of my social circle seems to be rather different. Nonetheless, it has been quite interesting to discover these possible connections through our conversation, hasn't it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Lena Goodwin\nLily Greenberg's background: \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nKathleen: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Greek Company: Demaco Location Preference: indoor \nCarol: School: Hood College Major: Library Science Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: outdoor \nHerman: School: University of Puget Sound Major: Library Science Company: Mesa Airlines Location Preference: indoor \nMatthew: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Asian & Pacific Area Studies Company: Savers Location Preference: indoor \nMark: School: University of Arkansas - Monticello Major: Economics Company: Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Location Preference: outdoor \nDeborah: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Pre-Law Company: Aramark Location Preference: outdoor \nKelly: School: Hood College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Mesa Airlines Location Preference: outdoor \nGracie: School: Ithaca College Major: Mathematics Education Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nEtta: School: University of Arkansas - Monticello Major: Judaism & Jewish Studies Company: Aramark Location Preference: outdoor \nNatasha: School: Thomas Edison State College Major: Linguistics Company: Invacare Corporation Location Preference: outdoor \nLloyd: School: Eastern Michigan University Major: Geophysical Engineering Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: outdoor \nBrian: School: Ithaca College Major: Asian & Pacific Area Studies Company: Orange Micro Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello there! It's a pleasure to meet you, Lena. Always nice to chitchat at these parties. Do you by any chance know Ithaca College? I have quite a few friends who studied there. Do you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hello Lily! Yes, I do know about Ithaca College. In fact, I have a couple of friends who graduated from there. My friend Gracie majored in Mathematics Education and works at Aramark. She mainly prefers staying indoors. Another friend, Brian, majored in Asian & Pacific Area Studies and is working at Orange Micro. Do any of these details sound familiar to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Oh, that's interesting! I also know a Gracie from Ithaca who majored in mathematics education and currently works at Aramark. It's a small world, isn't it? Do you, by chance, know anyone from Creighton University?\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"It certainly is a small world, Lily! Unfortunately, I don't think I know anyone from Creighton University. Most of my friends attended other colleges. Does the name Aramark sound familiar to you by any chance? Several of my friends are currently working there.\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"Yes, Aramark is indeed a familiar name to me. Quite a few of my friends are working there. For instance, I have a friend named Tyler who pursued Middle Eastern Languages in Columbia College Chicago and now works at Aramark. Perhaps, you might know him?\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"That's interesting, but I don't think I know a Tyler from Aramark. My friends Deborah and Kelly work there as well, Deborah was a Pre-Law major and Kelly studied Middle Eastern Languages. Perhaps you might know one of them?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Though Deborah and Kelly sound like delightful individuals, I can't say I know them personally. Speaking of the study of languages, I know another friend who pursued language studies. She studied German at the University of Dubuque and currently works at Illinois Tool Works. Her name is Richard. Does the name ring any bells for you?\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"While the name Richard does sound familiar, I'm not certain if it's the same person you're referring to as my acquaintance works at a different company. On the topic of Illinois Tool Works, however, I do have a friend named Carol who majored in Library Science and another friend, Lloyd, who majored in Geophysical Engineering. Do you perhaps know them?\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"I'm afraid I don't know Carol or Lloyd personally. However, Library Science reminds me of another friend of mine, Randy. He studied the same at Holy Cross College and currently works at the American Licorice Company. Perhaps you've crossed paths with him?\"\n\nTurn #9: Lena Goodwin said: \"I'm afraid I don't know a Randy from Holy Cross College. But it's fascinating how we both have friends who majored in Library Science. Speaking of which, my friend Herman also pursued Library Science and is currently employed at Mesa Airlines. Does Herman's name sound familiar to you?\"\n\nTurn #10: Lily Greenberg said: \"Herman doesn't ring a bell, Lena. But since we're on the topic of Mesa Airlines, I have a friend named Cody who works for LinkedIn, but had majored in Mathematics Education at Metropolitan State University. Could it be that you've met him before?\"\n\nTurn #11: Lena Goodwin said: \"I'm afraid I don't know a Cody from LinkedIn. Although, relating to Mathematics Education, my friend Gracie from Ithaca College pursued the same field and is currently working at Aramark. Perhaps you're acquainted with her?\"\n\nTurn #12: Lily Greenberg said: \"Indeed, we have already established our mutual connection through Gracie. It's fascinating how friendships weave such interconnected webs, isn't it? Have you by chance heard of a company called Speedway Motorsports? I have a friend named Harry who studied Computer Engineering at Creighton University and now works there.\"\n\nTurn #13: Lena Goodwin said: \"I can't say that I've heard of Speedway Motorsports, and I don't know Harry either, unfortunately. The focus of my social circle seems to be rather different. Nonetheless, it has been quite interesting to discover these possible connections through our conversation, hasn't it?\"\n\nTurn #14: Lily Greenberg said: \"Indeed, Lena, it's been very enlightening to discover these web-like connections. Sometimes, we don't realize how intertwined our paths are. It's been a pleasure conversing with you. I look forward to seeing our social circles intertwine more in the future.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Lily. The intricate web of connections we share through our friends truly is fascinating. It was a pleasure on my end as well to have this conversation. Let's definitely make it a point to connect more in the future.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lena Goodwin, your task is to act/speak as Lena Goodwin would, keeping in mind Lena Goodwin's social goal.\nYou can find Lena Goodwin's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lena Goodwin's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lena Goodwin's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Lena Goodwin\nLily Greenberg's background: \nLena Goodwin's background: Lena Goodwin is a 37-year-old female architect. She/her pronouns. In her downtime, Lena Goodwin, an architect, enjoys landscape photography, capturing beautiful images of the buildings and structures she designs. Personality and values description: Lena Goodwin is an organized and introverted individual. She values achievement and attentiveness and her decision-making is largely analytical. Lena's secrets: She once stole her best friend's boyfriend.\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nLena Goodwin's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nKathleen: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Greek Company: Demaco Location Preference: indoor \nCarol: School: Hood College Major: Library Science Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: outdoor \nHerman: School: University of Puget Sound Major: Library Science Company: Mesa Airlines Location Preference: indoor \nMatthew: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Asian & Pacific Area Studies Company: Savers Location Preference: indoor \nMark: School: University of Arkansas - Monticello Major: Economics Company: Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Location Preference: outdoor \nDeborah: School: William Mitchell College of Law Major: Pre-Law Company: Aramark Location Preference: outdoor \nKelly: School: Hood College Major: Middle Eastern Languages Company: Mesa Airlines Location Preference: outdoor \nGracie: School: Ithaca College Major: Mathematics Education Company: Aramark Location Preference: indoor \nEtta: School: University of Arkansas - Monticello Major: Judaism & Jewish Studies Company: Aramark Location Preference: outdoor \nNatasha: School: Thomas Edison State College Major: Linguistics Company: Invacare Corporation Location Preference: outdoor \nLloyd: School: Eastern Michigan University Major: Geophysical Engineering Company: Illinois Tool Works Location Preference: outdoor \nBrian: School: Ithaca College Major: Asian & Pacific Area Studies Company: Orange Micro Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello there! It's a pleasure to meet you, Lena. Always nice to chitchat at these parties. Do you by any chance know Ithaca College? I have quite a few friends who studied there. Do you?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hello Lily! Yes, I do know about Ithaca College. In fact, I have a couple of friends who graduated from there. My friend Gracie majored in Mathematics Education and works at Aramark. She mainly prefers staying indoors. Another friend, Brian, majored in Asian & Pacific Area Studies and is working at Orange Micro. Do any of these details sound familiar to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Oh, that's interesting! I also know a Gracie from Ithaca who majored in mathematics education and currently works at Aramark. It's a small world, isn't it? Do you, by chance, know anyone from Creighton University?\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"It certainly is a small world, Lily! Unfortunately, I don't think I know anyone from Creighton University. Most of my friends attended other colleges. Does the name Aramark sound familiar to you by any chance? Several of my friends are currently working there.\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"Yes, Aramark is indeed a familiar name to me. Quite a few of my friends are working there. For instance, I have a friend named Tyler who pursued Middle Eastern Languages in Columbia College Chicago and now works at Aramark. Perhaps, you might know him?\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"That's interesting, but I don't think I know a Tyler from Aramark. My friends Deborah and Kelly work there as well, Deborah was a Pre-Law major and Kelly studied Middle Eastern Languages. Perhaps you might know one of them?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Though Deborah and Kelly sound like delightful individuals, I can't say I know them personally. Speaking of the study of languages, I know another friend who pursued language studies. She studied German at the University of Dubuque and currently works at Illinois Tool Works. Her name is Richard. Does the name ring any bells for you?\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"While the name Richard does sound familiar, I'm not certain if it's the same person you're referring to as my acquaintance works at a different company. On the topic of Illinois Tool Works, however, I do have a friend named Carol who majored in Library Science and another friend, Lloyd, who majored in Geophysical Engineering. Do you perhaps know them?\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"I'm afraid I don't know Carol or Lloyd personally. However, Library Science reminds me of another friend of mine, Randy. He studied the same at Holy Cross College and currently works at the American Licorice Company. Perhaps you've crossed paths with him?\"\n\nTurn #9: Lena Goodwin said: \"I'm afraid I don't know a Randy from Holy Cross College. But it's fascinating how we both have friends who majored in Library Science. Speaking of which, my friend Herman also pursued Library Science and is currently employed at Mesa Airlines. Does Herman's name sound familiar to you?\"\n\nTurn #10: Lily Greenberg said: \"Herman doesn't ring a bell, Lena. But since we're on the topic of Mesa Airlines, I have a friend named Cody who works for LinkedIn, but had majored in Mathematics Education at Metropolitan State University. Could it be that you've met him before?\"\n\nTurn #11: Lena Goodwin said: \"I'm afraid I don't know a Cody from LinkedIn. Although, relating to Mathematics Education, my friend Gracie from Ithaca College pursued the same field and is currently working at Aramark. Perhaps you're acquainted with her?\"\n\nTurn #12: Lily Greenberg said: \"Indeed, we have already established our mutual connection through Gracie. It's fascinating how friendships weave such interconnected webs, isn't it? Have you by chance heard of a company called Speedway Motorsports? I have a friend named Harry who studied Computer Engineering at Creighton University and now works there.\"\n\nTurn #13: Lena Goodwin said: \"I can't say that I've heard of Speedway Motorsports, and I don't know Harry either, unfortunately. The focus of my social circle seems to be rather different. Nonetheless, it has been quite interesting to discover these possible connections through our conversation, hasn't it?\"\n\nTurn #14: Lily Greenberg said: \"Indeed, Lena, it's been very enlightening to discover these web-like connections. Sometimes, we don't realize how intertwined our paths are. It's been a pleasure conversing with you. I look forward to seeing our social circles intertwine more in the future.\"\n\nTurn #15: Lena Goodwin said: \"Absolutely, Lily. The intricate web of connections we share through our friends truly is fascinating. It was a pleasure on my end as well to have this conversation. Let's definitely make it a point to connect more in the future.\"\n\nTurn #16: Lily Greenberg left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances meet at a charity event. One is a representative of the charity and the other is an attendee.\nParticipants: Ethan Smith and Noah Davis\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nNoah Davis's background: \nEthan Smith's goal: Persuade the other to make a small donation (Extra information: the charity is in dire need of funds but even a small donation will make a difference)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Good evening, Noah! Thank you so much for attending this event. Your presence alone is a statement of support for our cause.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances meet at a charity event. One is a representative of the charity and the other is an attendee.\nParticipants: Ethan Smith and Noah Davis\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nNoah Davis's background: \nEthan Smith's goal: Persuade the other to make a small donation (Extra information: the charity is in dire need of funds but even a small donation will make a difference)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Smith said: \"Good evening, Noah! Thank you so much for attending this event. Your presence alone is a statement of support for our cause.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Thank you, Ethan! It's indeed a worthy cause that your charity is fighting for. I'm glad to be a part of this event and provide whatever support I can.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm really glad to hear that, Noah. Your support does mean a lot to us. As you might know, even a small contribution can make a big difference in the lives of the underprivileged children we're supporting. Would you consider making a small donation tonight?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances meet at a charity event. One is a representative of the charity and the other is an attendee.\nParticipants: Ethan Smith and Noah Davis\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nNoah Davis's background: \nEthan Smith's goal: Persuade the other to make a small donation (Extra information: the charity is in dire need of funds but even a small donation will make a difference)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Smith said: \"Good evening, Noah! Thank you so much for attending this event. Your presence alone is a statement of support for our cause.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Thank you, Ethan! It's indeed a worthy cause that your charity is fighting for. I'm glad to be a part of this event and provide whatever support I can.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Smith said: \"I'm really glad to hear that, Noah. Your support does mean a lot to us. As you might know, even a small contribution can make a big difference in the lives of the underprivileged children we're supporting. Would you consider making a small donation tonight?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! I believe in what your organization is doing. I'd like to donate $50. It may not be a significant amount, but I'm sure every bit counts, right?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's really generous of you, Noah! Every single dollar plays a crucial role. Your donation will certainly help us move forward with our mission. On behalf of the organization, I can't thank you enough!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances meet at a charity event. One is a representative of the charity and the other is an attendee.\nParticipants: Ethan Smith and Noah Davis\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nNoah Davis's background: \nEthan Smith's goal: Persuade the other to make a small donation (Extra information: the charity is in dire need of funds but even a small donation will make a difference)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Smith said: \"Good evening, Noah! Thank you so much for attending this event. Your presence alone is a statement of support for our cause.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Thank you, Ethan! It's indeed a worthy cause that your charity is fighting for. I'm glad to be a part of this event and provide whatever support I can.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Smith said: \"I'm really glad to hear that, Noah. Your support does mean a lot to us. As you might know, even a small contribution can make a big difference in the lives of the underprivileged children we're supporting. Would you consider making a small donation tonight?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! I believe in what your organization is doing. I'd like to donate $50. It may not be a significant amount, but I'm sure every bit counts, right?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Smith said: \"That's really generous of you, Noah! Every single dollar plays a crucial role. Your donation will certainly help us move forward with our mission. On behalf of the organization, I can't thank you enough!\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"I'm happy to help, Ethan. It's a wonderful thing you're doing here. Let's all do our part to make a difference. Please continue the great work your charity is doing.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I appreciate your positive feedback, Noah. Your generosity will inspire others to step up as well. Let's keep this momentum going and make this world a better place for those children. Thank you for your commitment to making a difference.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances meet at a charity event. One is a representative of the charity and the other is an attendee.\nParticipants: Ethan Smith and Noah Davis\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nNoah Davis's background: \nEthan Smith's goal: Persuade the other to make a small donation (Extra information: the charity is in dire need of funds but even a small donation will make a difference)\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Smith said: \"Good evening, Noah! Thank you so much for attending this event. Your presence alone is a statement of support for our cause.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Thank you, Ethan! It's indeed a worthy cause that your charity is fighting for. I'm glad to be a part of this event and provide whatever support I can.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Smith said: \"I'm really glad to hear that, Noah. Your support does mean a lot to us. As you might know, even a small contribution can make a big difference in the lives of the underprivileged children we're supporting. Would you consider making a small donation tonight?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! I believe in what your organization is doing. I'd like to donate $50. It may not be a significant amount, but I'm sure every bit counts, right?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Smith said: \"That's really generous of you, Noah! Every single dollar plays a crucial role. Your donation will certainly help us move forward with our mission. On behalf of the organization, I can't thank you enough!\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"I'm happy to help, Ethan. It's a wonderful thing you're doing here. Let's all do our part to make a difference. Please continue the great work your charity is doing.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Smith said: \"I appreciate your positive feedback, Noah. Your generosity will inspire others to step up as well. Let's keep this momentum going and make this world a better place for those children. Thank you for your commitment to making a difference.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances meet at a charity event. One is a representative of the charity and the other is an attendee.\nParticipants: Ethan Smith and Noah Davis\nEthan Smith's background: \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Make a reasonable donation without disrupting personal budget (Extra information: you are already on a tight budget this month.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Smith said: \"Good evening, Noah! Thank you so much for attending this event. Your presence alone is a statement of support for our cause.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thank you, Ethan! It's indeed a worthy cause that your charity is fighting for. I'm glad to be a part of this event and provide whatever support I can.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances meet at a charity event. One is a representative of the charity and the other is an attendee.\nParticipants: Ethan Smith and Noah Davis\nEthan Smith's background: \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Make a reasonable donation without disrupting personal budget (Extra information: you are already on a tight budget this month.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Smith said: \"Good evening, Noah! Thank you so much for attending this event. Your presence alone is a statement of support for our cause.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Thank you, Ethan! It's indeed a worthy cause that your charity is fighting for. I'm glad to be a part of this event and provide whatever support I can.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Smith said: \"I'm really glad to hear that, Noah. Your support does mean a lot to us. As you might know, even a small contribution can make a big difference in the lives of the underprivileged children we're supporting. Would you consider making a small donation tonight?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Ethan! I believe in what your organization is doing. I'd like to donate $50. It may not be a significant amount, but I'm sure every bit counts, right?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances meet at a charity event. One is a representative of the charity and the other is an attendee.\nParticipants: Ethan Smith and Noah Davis\nEthan Smith's background: \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Make a reasonable donation without disrupting personal budget (Extra information: you are already on a tight budget this month.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Smith said: \"Good evening, Noah! Thank you so much for attending this event. Your presence alone is a statement of support for our cause.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Thank you, Ethan! It's indeed a worthy cause that your charity is fighting for. I'm glad to be a part of this event and provide whatever support I can.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Smith said: \"I'm really glad to hear that, Noah. Your support does mean a lot to us. As you might know, even a small contribution can make a big difference in the lives of the underprivileged children we're supporting. Would you consider making a small donation tonight?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! I believe in what your organization is doing. I'd like to donate $50. It may not be a significant amount, but I'm sure every bit counts, right?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Smith said: \"That's really generous of you, Noah! Every single dollar plays a crucial role. Your donation will certainly help us move forward with our mission. On behalf of the organization, I can't thank you enough!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm happy to help, Ethan. It's a wonderful thing you're doing here. Let's all do our part to make a difference. Please continue the great work your charity is doing.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two acquaintances meet at a charity event. One is a representative of the charity and the other is an attendee.\nParticipants: Ethan Smith and Noah Davis\nEthan Smith's background: \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: Make a reasonable donation without disrupting personal budget (Extra information: you are already on a tight budget this month.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Smith said: \"Good evening, Noah! Thank you so much for attending this event. Your presence alone is a statement of support for our cause.\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Thank you, Ethan! It's indeed a worthy cause that your charity is fighting for. I'm glad to be a part of this event and provide whatever support I can.\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Smith said: \"I'm really glad to hear that, Noah. Your support does mean a lot to us. As you might know, even a small contribution can make a big difference in the lives of the underprivileged children we're supporting. Would you consider making a small donation tonight?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Ethan! I believe in what your organization is doing. I'd like to donate $50. It may not be a significant amount, but I'm sure every bit counts, right?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Smith said: \"That's really generous of you, Noah! Every single dollar plays a crucial role. Your donation will certainly help us move forward with our mission. On behalf of the organization, I can't thank you enough!\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"I'm happy to help, Ethan. It's a wonderful thing you're doing here. Let's all do our part to make a difference. Please continue the great work your charity is doing.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Smith said: \"I appreciate your positive feedback, Noah. Your generosity will inspire others to step up as well. Let's keep this momentum going and make this world a better place for those children. Thank you for your commitment to making a difference.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Antique Chair for $15.0, while another person is interested in purchasing it. Here's what you need to know about the item: it's a beautifully carved antique wooden chair. It's in good condition, but could probably benefit from a fresh seat cushion.\nParticipants: William Brown and Ava Martinez\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nAva Martinez's background: \nWilliam Brown's goal: You are the buyer for this item, and your target price is $9.0. If you purchase it at a significantly higher price, be aware that you will incur a penalty. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hi Ava, that's a nice antique chair you are offering. Could I get a little more information about its age and origin, please?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Antique Chair for $15.0, while another person is interested in purchasing it. Here's what you need to know about the item: it's a beautifully carved antique wooden chair. It's in good condition, but could probably benefit from a fresh seat cushion.\nParticipants: William Brown and Ava Martinez\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nAva Martinez's background: \nWilliam Brown's goal: You are the buyer for this item, and your target price is $9.0. If you purchase it at a significantly higher price, be aware that you will incur a penalty. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: William Brown said: \"Hi Ava, that's a nice antique chair you are offering. Could I get a little more information about its age and origin, please?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hi William, sure thing! Although I don't have the exact age or origin, I believe it's about 70 to 80 years old based on the styling and construction. It has no particular marks or labels, but it very much aligns with the American arts and crafts movement.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's quite interesting, Ava! I have a thing for items with history. Now, considering that I might need to redo the seat cushion, would you be willing to lower the price? Let's say, around $9?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Antique Chair for $15.0, while another person is interested in purchasing it. Here's what you need to know about the item: it's a beautifully carved antique wooden chair. It's in good condition, but could probably benefit from a fresh seat cushion.\nParticipants: William Brown and Ava Martinez\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nAva Martinez's background: \nWilliam Brown's goal: You are the buyer for this item, and your target price is $9.0. If you purchase it at a significantly higher price, be aware that you will incur a penalty. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: William Brown said: \"Hi Ava, that's a nice antique chair you are offering. Could I get a little more information about its age and origin, please?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hi William, sure thing! Although I don't have the exact age or origin, I believe it's about 70 to 80 years old based on the styling and construction. It has no particular marks or labels, but it very much aligns with the American arts and crafts movement.\"\n\nTurn #2: William Brown said: \"That's quite interesting, Ava! I have a thing for items with history. Now, considering that I might need to redo the seat cushion, would you be willing to lower the price? Let's say, around $9?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"It's great that you appreciate the beauty of history, William! Regarding the price, since you'll need to invest in a new cushion, I'm willing to drop the price a little bit. How does $11 sound to you?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's quite reasonable Ava, considering I do also value the chairs' historical influence. How about we meet in the middle at $10? This way, it's a win situation for both of us.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Antique Chair for $15.0, while another person is interested in purchasing it. Here's what you need to know about the item: it's a beautifully carved antique wooden chair. It's in good condition, but could probably benefit from a fresh seat cushion.\nParticipants: William Brown and Ava Martinez\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nAva Martinez's background: \nWilliam Brown's goal: You are the buyer for this item, and your target price is $9.0. If you purchase it at a significantly higher price, be aware that you will incur a penalty. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: William Brown said: \"Hi Ava, that's a nice antique chair you are offering. Could I get a little more information about its age and origin, please?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hi William, sure thing! Although I don't have the exact age or origin, I believe it's about 70 to 80 years old based on the styling and construction. It has no particular marks or labels, but it very much aligns with the American arts and crafts movement.\"\n\nTurn #2: William Brown said: \"That's quite interesting, Ava! I have a thing for items with history. Now, considering that I might need to redo the seat cushion, would you be willing to lower the price? Let's say, around $9?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"It's great that you appreciate the beauty of history, William! Regarding the price, since you'll need to invest in a new cushion, I'm willing to drop the price a little bit. How does $11 sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #4: William Brown said: \"That's quite reasonable Ava, considering I do also value the chairs' historical influence. How about we meet in the middle at $10? This way, it's a win situation for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"I think that's a fair proposal, William. Let's settle at $10. I'm sure you will be able to give this chair the care it deserves. When and where would you like to pick it up?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Great! I can pick it up tomorrow afternoon if that works for you. By the way, do you mind if I pay in cash?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Antique Chair for $15.0, while another person is interested in purchasing it. Here's what you need to know about the item: it's a beautifully carved antique wooden chair. It's in good condition, but could probably benefit from a fresh seat cushion.\nParticipants: William Brown and Ava Martinez\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nAva Martinez's background: \nWilliam Brown's goal: You are the buyer for this item, and your target price is $9.0. If you purchase it at a significantly higher price, be aware that you will incur a penalty. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: William Brown said: \"Hi Ava, that's a nice antique chair you are offering. Could I get a little more information about its age and origin, please?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hi William, sure thing! Although I don't have the exact age or origin, I believe it's about 70 to 80 years old based on the styling and construction. It has no particular marks or labels, but it very much aligns with the American arts and crafts movement.\"\n\nTurn #2: William Brown said: \"That's quite interesting, Ava! I have a thing for items with history. Now, considering that I might need to redo the seat cushion, would you be willing to lower the price? Let's say, around $9?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"It's great that you appreciate the beauty of history, William! Regarding the price, since you'll need to invest in a new cushion, I'm willing to drop the price a little bit. How does $11 sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #4: William Brown said: \"That's quite reasonable Ava, considering I do also value the chairs' historical influence. How about we meet in the middle at $10? This way, it's a win situation for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"I think that's a fair proposal, William. Let's settle at $10. I'm sure you will be able to give this chair the care it deserves. When and where would you like to pick it up?\"\n\nTurn #6: William Brown said: \"Great! I can pick it up tomorrow afternoon if that works for you. By the way, do you mind if I pay in cash?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"That works perfectly for me, William! Yes, cash is fine. Let's meet at the coffee shop near campus, if that's okay with you. Don't forget to bring a vehicle big enough to transport the chair.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Perfect! I'll make sure to bring a suitably-sized vehicle. I'll see you at the coffee shop near campus tomorrow afternoon. Looking forward to giving the chair a new home!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Antique Chair for $15.0, while another person is interested in purchasing it. Here's what you need to know about the item: it's a beautifully carved antique wooden chair. It's in good condition, but could probably benefit from a fresh seat cushion.\nParticipants: William Brown and Ava Martinez\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nAva Martinez's background: \nWilliam Brown's goal: You are the buyer for this item, and your target price is $9.0. If you purchase it at a significantly higher price, be aware that you will incur a penalty. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: William Brown said: \"Hi Ava, that's a nice antique chair you are offering. Could I get a little more information about its age and origin, please?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hi William, sure thing! Although I don't have the exact age or origin, I believe it's about 70 to 80 years old based on the styling and construction. It has no particular marks or labels, but it very much aligns with the American arts and crafts movement.\"\n\nTurn #2: William Brown said: \"That's quite interesting, Ava! I have a thing for items with history. Now, considering that I might need to redo the seat cushion, would you be willing to lower the price? Let's say, around $9?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"It's great that you appreciate the beauty of history, William! Regarding the price, since you'll need to invest in a new cushion, I'm willing to drop the price a little bit. How does $11 sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #4: William Brown said: \"That's quite reasonable Ava, considering I do also value the chairs' historical influence. How about we meet in the middle at $10? This way, it's a win situation for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"I think that's a fair proposal, William. Let's settle at $10. I'm sure you will be able to give this chair the care it deserves. When and where would you like to pick it up?\"\n\nTurn #6: William Brown said: \"Great! I can pick it up tomorrow afternoon if that works for you. By the way, do you mind if I pay in cash?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"That works perfectly for me, William! Yes, cash is fine. Let's meet at the coffee shop near campus, if that's okay with you. Don't forget to bring a vehicle big enough to transport the chair.\"\n\nTurn #8: William Brown said: \"Perfect! I'll make sure to bring a suitably-sized vehicle. I'll see you at the coffee shop near campus tomorrow afternoon. Looking forward to giving the chair a new home!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, William! I'll see you there tomorrow afternoon. Looking forward to meeting you and passing the chair into your company. Take care!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Antique Chair for $15.0, while another person is interested in purchasing it. Here's what you need to know about the item: it's a beautifully carved antique wooden chair. It's in good condition, but could probably benefit from a fresh seat cushion.\nParticipants: William Brown and Ava Martinez\nWilliam Brown's background: \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: You are the seller for this item and your target price is $8. You should be aware that if you sell it for a price significantly lower than the target price, you will incur a penalty. However, if you manage to sell it for more than the target price, you stand to receive a bonus.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: William Brown said: \"Hi Ava, that's a nice antique chair you are offering. Could I get a little more information about its age and origin, please?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hi William, sure thing! Although I don't have the exact age or origin, I believe it's about 70 to 80 years old based on the styling and construction. It has no particular marks or labels, but it very much aligns with the American arts and crafts movement.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Antique Chair for $15.0, while another person is interested in purchasing it. Here's what you need to know about the item: it's a beautifully carved antique wooden chair. It's in good condition, but could probably benefit from a fresh seat cushion.\nParticipants: William Brown and Ava Martinez\nWilliam Brown's background: \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: You are the seller for this item and your target price is $8. You should be aware that if you sell it for a price significantly lower than the target price, you will incur a penalty. However, if you manage to sell it for more than the target price, you stand to receive a bonus.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: William Brown said: \"Hi Ava, that's a nice antique chair you are offering. Could I get a little more information about its age and origin, please?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hi William, sure thing! Although I don't have the exact age or origin, I believe it's about 70 to 80 years old based on the styling and construction. It has no particular marks or labels, but it very much aligns with the American arts and crafts movement.\"\n\nTurn #2: William Brown said: \"That's quite interesting, Ava! I have a thing for items with history. Now, considering that I might need to redo the seat cushion, would you be willing to lower the price? Let's say, around $9?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"It's great that you appreciate the beauty of history, William! Regarding the price, since you'll need to invest in a new cushion, I'm willing to drop the price a little bit. How does $11 sound to you?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Antique Chair for $15.0, while another person is interested in purchasing it. Here's what you need to know about the item: it's a beautifully carved antique wooden chair. It's in good condition, but could probably benefit from a fresh seat cushion.\nParticipants: William Brown and Ava Martinez\nWilliam Brown's background: \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: You are the seller for this item and your target price is $8. You should be aware that if you sell it for a price significantly lower than the target price, you will incur a penalty. However, if you manage to sell it for more than the target price, you stand to receive a bonus.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: William Brown said: \"Hi Ava, that's a nice antique chair you are offering. Could I get a little more information about its age and origin, please?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hi William, sure thing! Although I don't have the exact age or origin, I believe it's about 70 to 80 years old based on the styling and construction. It has no particular marks or labels, but it very much aligns with the American arts and crafts movement.\"\n\nTurn #2: William Brown said: \"That's quite interesting, Ava! I have a thing for items with history. Now, considering that I might need to redo the seat cushion, would you be willing to lower the price? Let's say, around $9?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"It's great that you appreciate the beauty of history, William! Regarding the price, since you'll need to invest in a new cushion, I'm willing to drop the price a little bit. How does $11 sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #4: William Brown said: \"That's quite reasonable Ava, considering I do also value the chairs' historical influence. How about we meet in the middle at $10? This way, it's a win situation for both of us.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I think that's a fair proposal, William. Let's settle at $10. I'm sure you will be able to give this chair the care it deserves. When and where would you like to pick it up?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Antique Chair for $15.0, while another person is interested in purchasing it. Here's what you need to know about the item: it's a beautifully carved antique wooden chair. It's in good condition, but could probably benefit from a fresh seat cushion.\nParticipants: William Brown and Ava Martinez\nWilliam Brown's background: \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: You are the seller for this item and your target price is $8. You should be aware that if you sell it for a price significantly lower than the target price, you will incur a penalty. However, if you manage to sell it for more than the target price, you stand to receive a bonus.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: William Brown said: \"Hi Ava, that's a nice antique chair you are offering. Could I get a little more information about its age and origin, please?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hi William, sure thing! Although I don't have the exact age or origin, I believe it's about 70 to 80 years old based on the styling and construction. It has no particular marks or labels, but it very much aligns with the American arts and crafts movement.\"\n\nTurn #2: William Brown said: \"That's quite interesting, Ava! I have a thing for items with history. Now, considering that I might need to redo the seat cushion, would you be willing to lower the price? Let's say, around $9?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"It's great that you appreciate the beauty of history, William! Regarding the price, since you'll need to invest in a new cushion, I'm willing to drop the price a little bit. How does $11 sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #4: William Brown said: \"That's quite reasonable Ava, considering I do also value the chairs' historical influence. How about we meet in the middle at $10? This way, it's a win situation for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"I think that's a fair proposal, William. Let's settle at $10. I'm sure you will be able to give this chair the care it deserves. When and where would you like to pick it up?\"\n\nTurn #6: William Brown said: \"Great! I can pick it up tomorrow afternoon if that works for you. By the way, do you mind if I pay in cash?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That works perfectly for me, William! Yes, cash is fine. Let's meet at the coffee shop near campus, if that's okay with you. Don't forget to bring a vehicle big enough to transport the chair.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Antique Chair for $15.0, while another person is interested in purchasing it. Here's what you need to know about the item: it's a beautifully carved antique wooden chair. It's in good condition, but could probably benefit from a fresh seat cushion.\nParticipants: William Brown and Ava Martinez\nWilliam Brown's background: \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: You are the seller for this item and your target price is $8. You should be aware that if you sell it for a price significantly lower than the target price, you will incur a penalty. However, if you manage to sell it for more than the target price, you stand to receive a bonus.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: William Brown said: \"Hi Ava, that's a nice antique chair you are offering. Could I get a little more information about its age and origin, please?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hi William, sure thing! Although I don't have the exact age or origin, I believe it's about 70 to 80 years old based on the styling and construction. It has no particular marks or labels, but it very much aligns with the American arts and crafts movement.\"\n\nTurn #2: William Brown said: \"That's quite interesting, Ava! I have a thing for items with history. Now, considering that I might need to redo the seat cushion, would you be willing to lower the price? Let's say, around $9?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"It's great that you appreciate the beauty of history, William! Regarding the price, since you'll need to invest in a new cushion, I'm willing to drop the price a little bit. How does $11 sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #4: William Brown said: \"That's quite reasonable Ava, considering I do also value the chairs' historical influence. How about we meet in the middle at $10? This way, it's a win situation for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"I think that's a fair proposal, William. Let's settle at $10. I'm sure you will be able to give this chair the care it deserves. When and where would you like to pick it up?\"\n\nTurn #6: William Brown said: \"Great! I can pick it up tomorrow afternoon if that works for you. By the way, do you mind if I pay in cash?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"That works perfectly for me, William! Yes, cash is fine. Let's meet at the coffee shop near campus, if that's okay with you. Don't forget to bring a vehicle big enough to transport the chair.\"\n\nTurn #8: William Brown said: \"Perfect! I'll make sure to bring a suitably-sized vehicle. I'll see you at the coffee shop near campus tomorrow afternoon. Looking forward to giving the chair a new home!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, William! I'll see you there tomorrow afternoon. Looking forward to meeting you and passing the chair into your company. Take care!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Antique Chair for $15.0, while another person is interested in purchasing it. Here's what you need to know about the item: it's a beautifully carved antique wooden chair. It's in good condition, but could probably benefit from a fresh seat cushion.\nParticipants: William Brown and Ava Martinez\nWilliam Brown's background: \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: You are the seller for this item and your target price is $8. You should be aware that if you sell it for a price significantly lower than the target price, you will incur a penalty. However, if you manage to sell it for more than the target price, you stand to receive a bonus.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: William Brown said: \"Hi Ava, that's a nice antique chair you are offering. Could I get a little more information about its age and origin, please?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Hi William, sure thing! Although I don't have the exact age or origin, I believe it's about 70 to 80 years old based on the styling and construction. It has no particular marks or labels, but it very much aligns with the American arts and crafts movement.\"\n\nTurn #2: William Brown said: \"That's quite interesting, Ava! I have a thing for items with history. Now, considering that I might need to redo the seat cushion, would you be willing to lower the price? Let's say, around $9?\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"It's great that you appreciate the beauty of history, William! Regarding the price, since you'll need to invest in a new cushion, I'm willing to drop the price a little bit. How does $11 sound to you?\"\n\nTurn #4: William Brown said: \"That's quite reasonable Ava, considering I do also value the chairs' historical influence. How about we meet in the middle at $10? This way, it's a win situation for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez said: \"I think that's a fair proposal, William. Let's settle at $10. I'm sure you will be able to give this chair the care it deserves. When and where would you like to pick it up?\"\n\nTurn #6: William Brown said: \"Great! I can pick it up tomorrow afternoon if that works for you. By the way, do you mind if I pay in cash?\"\n\nTurn #7: Ava Martinez said: \"That works perfectly for me, William! Yes, cash is fine. Let's meet at the coffee shop near campus, if that's okay with you. Don't forget to bring a vehicle big enough to transport the chair.\"\n\nTurn #8: William Brown said: \"Perfect! I'll make sure to bring a suitably-sized vehicle. I'll see you at the coffee shop near campus tomorrow afternoon. Looking forward to giving the chair a new home!\"\n\nTurn #9: Ava Martinez said: \"Absolutely, William! I'll see you there tomorrow afternoon. Looking forward to meeting you and passing the chair into your company. Take care!\"\n\nTurn #10: William Brown left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Italian Leather Loveseat for $50.0, while another person is showing interest to purchase it. The item is a full-sized loveseat, crafted from Italian leather in a faded burgandy color. It still has the original tags, and the current owner is the first and only owner. The loveseat is in good condition with no rips or tears, and all cushions are well preserved. The leather presents a charming faded look with various small scratches from the owner's cat, adding a touch of ruggedness perfect for a Man Cave. The transaction is strictly cash and carry as the owner does not offer delivery services.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nSamuel Anderson's goal: You are the designated buyer for this item and your target price is set at $46.0. If you purchase this item at a significantly higher price than the target, you would face a penalty. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hello Hendrick, I'm interested in your Italian leather loveseat! It sounds like it's in good condition, with added character from your cat's scratches. Here's my offer - how about $46 for it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Italian Leather Loveseat for $50.0, while another person is showing interest to purchase it. The item is a full-sized loveseat, crafted from Italian leather in a faded burgandy color. It still has the original tags, and the current owner is the first and only owner. The loveseat is in good condition with no rips or tears, and all cushions are well preserved. The leather presents a charming faded look with various small scratches from the owner's cat, adding a touch of ruggedness perfect for a Man Cave. The transaction is strictly cash and carry as the owner does not offer delivery services.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nSamuel Anderson's goal: You are the designated buyer for this item and your target price is set at $46.0. If you purchase this item at a significantly higher price than the target, you would face a penalty. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hello Hendrick, I'm interested in your Italian leather loveseat! It sounds like it's in good condition, with added character from your cat's scratches. Here's my offer - how about $46 for it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hi Samuel, thanks for your interest and a reasonable offer. However, considering its quality and craftsmanship, I'm thinking $54 would make a fair deal for this stunning piece of furniture. It will be a great addition to your living space!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Hendrick, I absolutely agree with you about the value and quality of the loveseat. However, would you consider meeting me halfway at $50? Think of it as an investment in a good karma: this beautiful piece will find a loving home and be cherished.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Italian Leather Loveseat for $50.0, while another person is showing interest to purchase it. The item is a full-sized loveseat, crafted from Italian leather in a faded burgandy color. It still has the original tags, and the current owner is the first and only owner. The loveseat is in good condition with no rips or tears, and all cushions are well preserved. The leather presents a charming faded look with various small scratches from the owner's cat, adding a touch of ruggedness perfect for a Man Cave. The transaction is strictly cash and carry as the owner does not offer delivery services.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nSamuel Anderson's goal: You are the designated buyer for this item and your target price is set at $46.0. If you purchase this item at a significantly higher price than the target, you would face a penalty. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hello Hendrick, I'm interested in your Italian leather loveseat! It sounds like it's in good condition, with added character from your cat's scratches. Here's my offer - how about $46 for it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hi Samuel, thanks for your interest and a reasonable offer. However, considering its quality and craftsmanship, I'm thinking $54 would make a fair deal for this stunning piece of furniture. It will be a great addition to your living space!\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hendrick, I absolutely agree with you about the value and quality of the loveseat. However, would you consider meeting me halfway at $50? Think of it as an investment in a good karma: this beautiful piece will find a loving home and be cherished.\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Samuel, I appreciate your offer and your understanding of its value. Let's deal it at $52. It's slightly higher than what you suggested but given its condition and unique charm, I believe it's worth it. This way, we split the difference and not compromise the value of the piece. Will that work for you?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hendrick, meetings of this kind should never be about compromise, and I mean that for both of us. I truly understand the worth of your exquisite piece. Would you mind, though, if we stick to a solid $50? It's a win-win situation for both and ideally still within our respective comfort zones. This way, I can guarantee that this loveseat will receive the appreciation it truly deserves in my living room. What do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Italian Leather Loveseat for $50.0, while another person is showing interest to purchase it. The item is a full-sized loveseat, crafted from Italian leather in a faded burgandy color. It still has the original tags, and the current owner is the first and only owner. The loveseat is in good condition with no rips or tears, and all cushions are well preserved. The leather presents a charming faded look with various small scratches from the owner's cat, adding a touch of ruggedness perfect for a Man Cave. The transaction is strictly cash and carry as the owner does not offer delivery services.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nSamuel Anderson's goal: You are the designated buyer for this item and your target price is set at $46.0. If you purchase this item at a significantly higher price than the target, you would face a penalty. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hello Hendrick, I'm interested in your Italian leather loveseat! It sounds like it's in good condition, with added character from your cat's scratches. Here's my offer - how about $46 for it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hi Samuel, thanks for your interest and a reasonable offer. However, considering its quality and craftsmanship, I'm thinking $54 would make a fair deal for this stunning piece of furniture. It will be a great addition to your living space!\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hendrick, I absolutely agree with you about the value and quality of the loveseat. However, would you consider meeting me halfway at $50? Think of it as an investment in a good karma: this beautiful piece will find a loving home and be cherished.\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Samuel, I appreciate your offer and your understanding of its value. Let's deal it at $52. It's slightly higher than what you suggested but given its condition and unique charm, I believe it's worth it. This way, we split the difference and not compromise the value of the piece. Will that work for you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hendrick, meetings of this kind should never be about compromise, and I mean that for both of us. I truly understand the worth of your exquisite piece. Would you mind, though, if we stick to a solid $50? It's a win-win situation for both and ideally still within our respective comfort zones. This way, I can guarantee that this loveseat will receive the appreciation it truly deserves in my living room. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Samuel, after taking into consideration your appreciation for the loveseat and its future place in your home, I can agree on $50. Consider it a good will gesture among gentlemen who appreciate fine craftsmanship. Let's make this deal.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hendrick, thank you for understanding and accommodating my offer. It's a deal then at $50. I'm excited to provide a new home for this lovely piece.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Italian Leather Loveseat for $50.0, while another person is showing interest to purchase it. The item is a full-sized loveseat, crafted from Italian leather in a faded burgandy color. It still has the original tags, and the current owner is the first and only owner. The loveseat is in good condition with no rips or tears, and all cushions are well preserved. The leather presents a charming faded look with various small scratches from the owner's cat, adding a touch of ruggedness perfect for a Man Cave. The transaction is strictly cash and carry as the owner does not offer delivery services.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nSamuel Anderson's goal: You are the designated buyer for this item and your target price is set at $46.0. If you purchase this item at a significantly higher price than the target, you would face a penalty. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hello Hendrick, I'm interested in your Italian leather loveseat! It sounds like it's in good condition, with added character from your cat's scratches. Here's my offer - how about $46 for it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hi Samuel, thanks for your interest and a reasonable offer. However, considering its quality and craftsmanship, I'm thinking $54 would make a fair deal for this stunning piece of furniture. It will be a great addition to your living space!\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hendrick, I absolutely agree with you about the value and quality of the loveseat. However, would you consider meeting me halfway at $50? Think of it as an investment in a good karma: this beautiful piece will find a loving home and be cherished.\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Samuel, I appreciate your offer and your understanding of its value. Let's deal it at $52. It's slightly higher than what you suggested but given its condition and unique charm, I believe it's worth it. This way, we split the difference and not compromise the value of the piece. Will that work for you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hendrick, meetings of this kind should never be about compromise, and I mean that for both of us. I truly understand the worth of your exquisite piece. Would you mind, though, if we stick to a solid $50? It's a win-win situation for both and ideally still within our respective comfort zones. This way, I can guarantee that this loveseat will receive the appreciation it truly deserves in my living room. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Samuel, after taking into consideration your appreciation for the loveseat and its future place in your home, I can agree on $50. Consider it a good will gesture among gentlemen who appreciate fine craftsmanship. Let's make this deal.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hendrick, thank you for understanding and accommodating my offer. It's a deal then at $50. I'm excited to provide a new home for this lovely piece.\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Great, Samuel. I'm glad we could come to an agreement. I am pretty sure you'll enjoy the charm and comfort this loveseat offers. Please arrange to collect it at your earliest convenience. Looking forward to see you.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I appreciate your flexibility, Hendrick. I'll arrange to collect it as soon as I can. Excited to integrate this loveseat into my living room!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Italian Leather Loveseat for $50.0, while another person is showing interest to purchase it. The item is a full-sized loveseat, crafted from Italian leather in a faded burgandy color. It still has the original tags, and the current owner is the first and only owner. The loveseat is in good condition with no rips or tears, and all cushions are well preserved. The leather presents a charming faded look with various small scratches from the owner's cat, adding a touch of ruggedness perfect for a Man Cave. The transaction is strictly cash and carry as the owner does not offer delivery services.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nSamuel Anderson's goal: You are the designated buyer for this item and your target price is set at $46.0. If you purchase this item at a significantly higher price than the target, you would face a penalty. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hello Hendrick, I'm interested in your Italian leather loveseat! It sounds like it's in good condition, with added character from your cat's scratches. Here's my offer - how about $46 for it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hi Samuel, thanks for your interest and a reasonable offer. However, considering its quality and craftsmanship, I'm thinking $54 would make a fair deal for this stunning piece of furniture. It will be a great addition to your living space!\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hendrick, I absolutely agree with you about the value and quality of the loveseat. However, would you consider meeting me halfway at $50? Think of it as an investment in a good karma: this beautiful piece will find a loving home and be cherished.\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Samuel, I appreciate your offer and your understanding of its value. Let's deal it at $52. It's slightly higher than what you suggested but given its condition and unique charm, I believe it's worth it. This way, we split the difference and not compromise the value of the piece. Will that work for you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hendrick, meetings of this kind should never be about compromise, and I mean that for both of us. I truly understand the worth of your exquisite piece. Would you mind, though, if we stick to a solid $50? It's a win-win situation for both and ideally still within our respective comfort zones. This way, I can guarantee that this loveseat will receive the appreciation it truly deserves in my living room. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Samuel, after taking into consideration your appreciation for the loveseat and its future place in your home, I can agree on $50. Consider it a good will gesture among gentlemen who appreciate fine craftsmanship. Let's make this deal.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hendrick, thank you for understanding and accommodating my offer. It's a deal then at $50. I'm excited to provide a new home for this lovely piece.\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Great, Samuel. I'm glad we could come to an agreement. I am pretty sure you'll enjoy the charm and comfort this loveseat offers. Please arrange to collect it at your earliest convenience. Looking forward to see you.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"I appreciate your flexibility, Hendrick. I'll arrange to collect it as soon as I can. Excited to integrate this loveseat into my living room!\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Italian Leather Loveseat for $50.0, while another person is showing interest to purchase it. The item is a full-sized loveseat, crafted from Italian leather in a faded burgandy color. It still has the original tags, and the current owner is the first and only owner. The loveseat is in good condition with no rips or tears, and all cushions are well preserved. The leather presents a charming faded look with various small scratches from the owner's cat, adding a touch of ruggedness perfect for a Man Cave. The transaction is strictly cash and carry as the owner does not offer delivery services.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are the seller for this item, with a target price of $26.5. You'll face a penalty if the item is sold significantly below this price. However, if you manage to sell it for more than the target price, a bonus will be your reward.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hello Hendrick, I'm interested in your Italian leather loveseat! It sounds like it's in good condition, with added character from your cat's scratches. Here's my offer - how about $46 for it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hi Samuel, thanks for your interest and a reasonable offer. However, considering its quality and craftsmanship, I'm thinking $54 would make a fair deal for this stunning piece of furniture. It will be a great addition to your living space!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Italian Leather Loveseat for $50.0, while another person is showing interest to purchase it. The item is a full-sized loveseat, crafted from Italian leather in a faded burgandy color. It still has the original tags, and the current owner is the first and only owner. The loveseat is in good condition with no rips or tears, and all cushions are well preserved. The leather presents a charming faded look with various small scratches from the owner's cat, adding a touch of ruggedness perfect for a Man Cave. The transaction is strictly cash and carry as the owner does not offer delivery services.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are the seller for this item, with a target price of $26.5. You'll face a penalty if the item is sold significantly below this price. However, if you manage to sell it for more than the target price, a bonus will be your reward.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hello Hendrick, I'm interested in your Italian leather loveseat! It sounds like it's in good condition, with added character from your cat's scratches. Here's my offer - how about $46 for it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hi Samuel, thanks for your interest and a reasonable offer. However, considering its quality and craftsmanship, I'm thinking $54 would make a fair deal for this stunning piece of furniture. It will be a great addition to your living space!\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hendrick, I absolutely agree with you about the value and quality of the loveseat. However, would you consider meeting me halfway at $50? Think of it as an investment in a good karma: this beautiful piece will find a loving home and be cherished.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Samuel, I appreciate your offer and your understanding of its value. Let's deal it at $52. It's slightly higher than what you suggested but given its condition and unique charm, I believe it's worth it. This way, we split the difference and not compromise the value of the piece. Will that work for you?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Italian Leather Loveseat for $50.0, while another person is showing interest to purchase it. The item is a full-sized loveseat, crafted from Italian leather in a faded burgandy color. It still has the original tags, and the current owner is the first and only owner. The loveseat is in good condition with no rips or tears, and all cushions are well preserved. The leather presents a charming faded look with various small scratches from the owner's cat, adding a touch of ruggedness perfect for a Man Cave. The transaction is strictly cash and carry as the owner does not offer delivery services.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are the seller for this item, with a target price of $26.5. You'll face a penalty if the item is sold significantly below this price. However, if you manage to sell it for more than the target price, a bonus will be your reward.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hello Hendrick, I'm interested in your Italian leather loveseat! It sounds like it's in good condition, with added character from your cat's scratches. Here's my offer - how about $46 for it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hi Samuel, thanks for your interest and a reasonable offer. However, considering its quality and craftsmanship, I'm thinking $54 would make a fair deal for this stunning piece of furniture. It will be a great addition to your living space!\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hendrick, I absolutely agree with you about the value and quality of the loveseat. However, would you consider meeting me halfway at $50? Think of it as an investment in a good karma: this beautiful piece will find a loving home and be cherished.\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Samuel, I appreciate your offer and your understanding of its value. Let's deal it at $52. It's slightly higher than what you suggested but given its condition and unique charm, I believe it's worth it. This way, we split the difference and not compromise the value of the piece. Will that work for you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hendrick, meetings of this kind should never be about compromise, and I mean that for both of us. I truly understand the worth of your exquisite piece. Would you mind, though, if we stick to a solid $50? It's a win-win situation for both and ideally still within our respective comfort zones. This way, I can guarantee that this loveseat will receive the appreciation it truly deserves in my living room. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Samuel, after taking into consideration your appreciation for the loveseat and its future place in your home, I can agree on $50. Consider it a good will gesture among gentlemen who appreciate fine craftsmanship. Let's make this deal.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Italian Leather Loveseat for $50.0, while another person is showing interest to purchase it. The item is a full-sized loveseat, crafted from Italian leather in a faded burgandy color. It still has the original tags, and the current owner is the first and only owner. The loveseat is in good condition with no rips or tears, and all cushions are well preserved. The leather presents a charming faded look with various small scratches from the owner's cat, adding a touch of ruggedness perfect for a Man Cave. The transaction is strictly cash and carry as the owner does not offer delivery services.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are the seller for this item, with a target price of $26.5. You'll face a penalty if the item is sold significantly below this price. However, if you manage to sell it for more than the target price, a bonus will be your reward.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hello Hendrick, I'm interested in your Italian leather loveseat! It sounds like it's in good condition, with added character from your cat's scratches. Here's my offer - how about $46 for it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hi Samuel, thanks for your interest and a reasonable offer. However, considering its quality and craftsmanship, I'm thinking $54 would make a fair deal for this stunning piece of furniture. It will be a great addition to your living space!\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hendrick, I absolutely agree with you about the value and quality of the loveseat. However, would you consider meeting me halfway at $50? Think of it as an investment in a good karma: this beautiful piece will find a loving home and be cherished.\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Samuel, I appreciate your offer and your understanding of its value. Let's deal it at $52. It's slightly higher than what you suggested but given its condition and unique charm, I believe it's worth it. This way, we split the difference and not compromise the value of the piece. Will that work for you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hendrick, meetings of this kind should never be about compromise, and I mean that for both of us. I truly understand the worth of your exquisite piece. Would you mind, though, if we stick to a solid $50? It's a win-win situation for both and ideally still within our respective comfort zones. This way, I can guarantee that this loveseat will receive the appreciation it truly deserves in my living room. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Samuel, after taking into consideration your appreciation for the loveseat and its future place in your home, I can agree on $50. Consider it a good will gesture among gentlemen who appreciate fine craftsmanship. Let's make this deal.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hendrick, thank you for understanding and accommodating my offer. It's a deal then at $50. I'm excited to provide a new home for this lovely piece.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Great, Samuel. I'm glad we could come to an agreement. I am pretty sure you'll enjoy the charm and comfort this loveseat offers. Please arrange to collect it at your earliest convenience. Looking forward to see you.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Italian Leather Loveseat for $50.0, while another person is showing interest to purchase it. The item is a full-sized loveseat, crafted from Italian leather in a faded burgandy color. It still has the original tags, and the current owner is the first and only owner. The loveseat is in good condition with no rips or tears, and all cushions are well preserved. The leather presents a charming faded look with various small scratches from the owner's cat, adding a touch of ruggedness perfect for a Man Cave. The transaction is strictly cash and carry as the owner does not offer delivery services.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are the seller for this item, with a target price of $26.5. You'll face a penalty if the item is sold significantly below this price. However, if you manage to sell it for more than the target price, a bonus will be your reward.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hello Hendrick, I'm interested in your Italian leather loveseat! It sounds like it's in good condition, with added character from your cat's scratches. Here's my offer - how about $46 for it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hi Samuel, thanks for your interest and a reasonable offer. However, considering its quality and craftsmanship, I'm thinking $54 would make a fair deal for this stunning piece of furniture. It will be a great addition to your living space!\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hendrick, I absolutely agree with you about the value and quality of the loveseat. However, would you consider meeting me halfway at $50? Think of it as an investment in a good karma: this beautiful piece will find a loving home and be cherished.\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Samuel, I appreciate your offer and your understanding of its value. Let's deal it at $52. It's slightly higher than what you suggested but given its condition and unique charm, I believe it's worth it. This way, we split the difference and not compromise the value of the piece. Will that work for you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hendrick, meetings of this kind should never be about compromise, and I mean that for both of us. I truly understand the worth of your exquisite piece. Would you mind, though, if we stick to a solid $50? It's a win-win situation for both and ideally still within our respective comfort zones. This way, I can guarantee that this loveseat will receive the appreciation it truly deserves in my living room. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Samuel, after taking into consideration your appreciation for the loveseat and its future place in your home, I can agree on $50. Consider it a good will gesture among gentlemen who appreciate fine craftsmanship. Let's make this deal.\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hendrick, thank you for understanding and accommodating my offer. It's a deal then at $50. I'm excited to provide a new home for this lovely piece.\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Great, Samuel. I'm glad we could come to an agreement. I am pretty sure you'll enjoy the charm and comfort this loveseat offers. Please arrange to collect it at your earliest convenience. Looking forward to see you.\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"I appreciate your flexibility, Hendrick. I'll arrange to collect it as soon as I can. Excited to integrate this loveseat into my living room!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Isabella White\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nIsabella White's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nAugust: School: Saint Vincent College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nJohn: School: University of Rhode Island Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nRebecca: School: State University of New York at Albany Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nNeoma: School: Hofstra University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nRonnie: School: National Technological University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nSuzette: School: Utah Valley State College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPenelope: School: Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nFernando: School: St. John's College-Santa Fe Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nVelda: School: Rhode Island College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \n\nIsabella White's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hello, Isabella. It's a pleasure to meet you. So do you have any affinity for either indoor or outdoor gatherings? I've got friends who are rather split on their preferences.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Isabella White\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nIsabella White's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nAugust: School: Saint Vincent College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nJohn: School: University of Rhode Island Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nRebecca: School: State University of New York at Albany Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nNeoma: School: Hofstra University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nRonnie: School: National Technological University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nSuzette: School: Utah Valley State College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPenelope: School: Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nFernando: School: St. John's College-Santa Fe Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nVelda: School: Rhode Island College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \n\nIsabella White's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello, Isabella. It's a pleasure to meet you. So do you have any affinity for either indoor or outdoor gatherings? I've got friends who are rather split on their preferences.\"\n\nTurn #1: Isabella White said: \"Nice to meet you too, Lily. That's an interesting question. I would say my preferences for gatherings largely depend on my mood. Sometimes I appreciate the tranquility of an indoor setting, but there are times when I enjoy the openness of the outdoors. By the way, do you happen to have attended any evening gatherings recently? I ask because several of my friends love to host events in the evenings.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, evening gatherings are something of a preference for me as well, ah the tranquility they bring! In fact, a couple of my friends love hosting indoor evenings. Do you happen to know Rebecca from State University of New York or Suzette from Utah Valley State? They're both known to host lovely evening events.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Isabella White\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nIsabella White's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nAugust: School: Saint Vincent College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nJohn: School: University of Rhode Island Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nRebecca: School: State University of New York at Albany Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nNeoma: School: Hofstra University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nRonnie: School: National Technological University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nSuzette: School: Utah Valley State College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPenelope: School: Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nFernando: School: St. John's College-Santa Fe Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nVelda: School: Rhode Island College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \n\nIsabella White's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello, Isabella. It's a pleasure to meet you. So do you have any affinity for either indoor or outdoor gatherings? I've got friends who are rather split on their preferences.\"\n\nTurn #1: Isabella White said: \"Nice to meet you too, Lily. That's an interesting question. I would say my preferences for gatherings largely depend on my mood. Sometimes I appreciate the tranquility of an indoor setting, but there are times when I enjoy the openness of the outdoors. By the way, do you happen to have attended any evening gatherings recently? I ask because several of my friends love to host events in the evenings.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Indeed, evening gatherings are something of a preference for me as well, ah the tranquility they bring! In fact, a couple of my friends love hosting indoor evenings. Do you happen to know Rebecca from State University of New York or Suzette from Utah Valley State? They're both known to host lovely evening events.\"\n\nTurn #3: Isabella White said: \"I don't think I've had the pleasure of meeting either Rebecca or Suzette. Though, your mention of the State University of New York did remind me of my friend William, who had also attended there. Do you happen to know him?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"William, you said? The name doesn't ring a bell, I'm afraid. On a different note, I have a friend, Fernando, who also enjoys evening gatherings but prefers the outdoors. He graduated from St. John's College in Santa Fe. Perhaps you know him?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Isabella White\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nIsabella White's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nAugust: School: Saint Vincent College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nJohn: School: University of Rhode Island Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nRebecca: School: State University of New York at Albany Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nNeoma: School: Hofstra University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nRonnie: School: National Technological University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nSuzette: School: Utah Valley State College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPenelope: School: Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nFernando: School: St. John's College-Santa Fe Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nVelda: School: Rhode Island College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \n\nIsabella White's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello, Isabella. It's a pleasure to meet you. So do you have any affinity for either indoor or outdoor gatherings? I've got friends who are rather split on their preferences.\"\n\nTurn #1: Isabella White said: \"Nice to meet you too, Lily. That's an interesting question. I would say my preferences for gatherings largely depend on my mood. Sometimes I appreciate the tranquility of an indoor setting, but there are times when I enjoy the openness of the outdoors. By the way, do you happen to have attended any evening gatherings recently? I ask because several of my friends love to host events in the evenings.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Indeed, evening gatherings are something of a preference for me as well, ah the tranquility they bring! In fact, a couple of my friends love hosting indoor evenings. Do you happen to know Rebecca from State University of New York or Suzette from Utah Valley State? They're both known to host lovely evening events.\"\n\nTurn #3: Isabella White said: \"I don't think I've had the pleasure of meeting either Rebecca or Suzette. Though, your mention of the State University of New York did remind me of my friend William, who had also attended there. Do you happen to know him?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"William, you said? The name doesn't ring a bell, I'm afraid. On a different note, I have a friend, Fernando, who also enjoys evening gatherings but prefers the outdoors. He graduated from St. John's College in Santa Fe. Perhaps you know him?\"\n\nTurn #5: Isabella White said: \"Oh, I'm not sure if I know Fernando. However, I do have a friend Betty from St. John's College in Santa Fe who also prefers evening outings but she likes them indoors. It's a small world after all, isn't it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, it surely is a small world! It's quite interesting how paths intersect. Speaking of evening indoor gatherings, do you by any chance know Neoma from Hofstra University or Velda from Rhode Island College? They both love such settings.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Isabella White\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nIsabella White's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nAugust: School: Saint Vincent College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nJohn: School: University of Rhode Island Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nRebecca: School: State University of New York at Albany Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nNeoma: School: Hofstra University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nRonnie: School: National Technological University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nSuzette: School: Utah Valley State College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPenelope: School: Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nFernando: School: St. John's College-Santa Fe Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nVelda: School: Rhode Island College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \n\nIsabella White's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello, Isabella. It's a pleasure to meet you. So do you have any affinity for either indoor or outdoor gatherings? I've got friends who are rather split on their preferences.\"\n\nTurn #1: Isabella White said: \"Nice to meet you too, Lily. That's an interesting question. I would say my preferences for gatherings largely depend on my mood. Sometimes I appreciate the tranquility of an indoor setting, but there are times when I enjoy the openness of the outdoors. By the way, do you happen to have attended any evening gatherings recently? I ask because several of my friends love to host events in the evenings.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Indeed, evening gatherings are something of a preference for me as well, ah the tranquility they bring! In fact, a couple of my friends love hosting indoor evenings. Do you happen to know Rebecca from State University of New York or Suzette from Utah Valley State? They're both known to host lovely evening events.\"\n\nTurn #3: Isabella White said: \"I don't think I've had the pleasure of meeting either Rebecca or Suzette. Though, your mention of the State University of New York did remind me of my friend William, who had also attended there. Do you happen to know him?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"William, you said? The name doesn't ring a bell, I'm afraid. On a different note, I have a friend, Fernando, who also enjoys evening gatherings but prefers the outdoors. He graduated from St. John's College in Santa Fe. Perhaps you know him?\"\n\nTurn #5: Isabella White said: \"Oh, I'm not sure if I know Fernando. However, I do have a friend Betty from St. John's College in Santa Fe who also prefers evening outings but she likes them indoors. It's a small world after all, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Indeed, it surely is a small world! It's quite interesting how paths intersect. Speaking of evening indoor gatherings, do you by any chance know Neoma from Hofstra University or Velda from Rhode Island College? They both love such settings.\"\n\nTurn #7: Isabella White said: \"How interesting, Lily, I do have a dear friend Neoma too who is also a graduate from Hofstra University and loves those indoor evening settings. But as far as I know, she is the only one I am acquainted with from there. Velda doesn't seem familiar to me.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"What a lovely coincidence, Isabella! It seems we do share a connection through Neoma. She's such a wonderful person. Isn't it fascinating how our paths have converged this evening?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Isabella White\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nIsabella White's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nAugust: School: Saint Vincent College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nJohn: School: University of Rhode Island Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nRebecca: School: State University of New York at Albany Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nNeoma: School: Hofstra University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nRonnie: School: National Technological University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nSuzette: School: Utah Valley State College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPenelope: School: Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nFernando: School: St. John's College-Santa Fe Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nVelda: School: Rhode Island College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \n\nIsabella White's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello, Isabella. It's a pleasure to meet you. So do you have any affinity for either indoor or outdoor gatherings? I've got friends who are rather split on their preferences.\"\n\nTurn #1: Isabella White said: \"Nice to meet you too, Lily. That's an interesting question. I would say my preferences for gatherings largely depend on my mood. Sometimes I appreciate the tranquility of an indoor setting, but there are times when I enjoy the openness of the outdoors. By the way, do you happen to have attended any evening gatherings recently? I ask because several of my friends love to host events in the evenings.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Indeed, evening gatherings are something of a preference for me as well, ah the tranquility they bring! In fact, a couple of my friends love hosting indoor evenings. Do you happen to know Rebecca from State University of New York or Suzette from Utah Valley State? They're both known to host lovely evening events.\"\n\nTurn #3: Isabella White said: \"I don't think I've had the pleasure of meeting either Rebecca or Suzette. Though, your mention of the State University of New York did remind me of my friend William, who had also attended there. Do you happen to know him?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"William, you said? The name doesn't ring a bell, I'm afraid. On a different note, I have a friend, Fernando, who also enjoys evening gatherings but prefers the outdoors. He graduated from St. John's College in Santa Fe. Perhaps you know him?\"\n\nTurn #5: Isabella White said: \"Oh, I'm not sure if I know Fernando. However, I do have a friend Betty from St. John's College in Santa Fe who also prefers evening outings but she likes them indoors. It's a small world after all, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Indeed, it surely is a small world! It's quite interesting how paths intersect. Speaking of evening indoor gatherings, do you by any chance know Neoma from Hofstra University or Velda from Rhode Island College? They both love such settings.\"\n\nTurn #7: Isabella White said: \"How interesting, Lily, I do have a dear friend Neoma too who is also a graduate from Hofstra University and loves those indoor evening settings. But as far as I know, she is the only one I am acquainted with from there. Velda doesn't seem familiar to me.\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"What a lovely coincidence, Isabella! It seems we do share a connection through Neoma. She's such a wonderful person. Isn't it fascinating how our paths have converged this evening?\"\n\nTurn #9: Isabella White said: \"It really is fascinating, Lily. Who would've thought we had a mutual connection? Just reaffirms the saying 'six degrees of separation'. Thank you for such an interesting conversation!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed! The world is a lot smaller than we think. It's been a pleasure meeting you, Isabella. I'm looking forward to more such intriguing interactions in the future!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Isabella White\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nIsabella White's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nAugust: School: Saint Vincent College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nJohn: School: University of Rhode Island Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nRebecca: School: State University of New York at Albany Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nNeoma: School: Hofstra University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nRonnie: School: National Technological University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nSuzette: School: Utah Valley State College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nPenelope: School: Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nFernando: School: St. John's College-Santa Fe Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nVelda: School: Rhode Island College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \n\nIsabella White's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello, Isabella. It's a pleasure to meet you. So do you have any affinity for either indoor or outdoor gatherings? I've got friends who are rather split on their preferences.\"\n\nTurn #1: Isabella White said: \"Nice to meet you too, Lily. That's an interesting question. I would say my preferences for gatherings largely depend on my mood. Sometimes I appreciate the tranquility of an indoor setting, but there are times when I enjoy the openness of the outdoors. By the way, do you happen to have attended any evening gatherings recently? I ask because several of my friends love to host events in the evenings.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Indeed, evening gatherings are something of a preference for me as well, ah the tranquility they bring! In fact, a couple of my friends love hosting indoor evenings. Do you happen to know Rebecca from State University of New York or Suzette from Utah Valley State? They're both known to host lovely evening events.\"\n\nTurn #3: Isabella White said: \"I don't think I've had the pleasure of meeting either Rebecca or Suzette. Though, your mention of the State University of New York did remind me of my friend William, who had also attended there. Do you happen to know him?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"William, you said? The name doesn't ring a bell, I'm afraid. On a different note, I have a friend, Fernando, who also enjoys evening gatherings but prefers the outdoors. He graduated from St. John's College in Santa Fe. Perhaps you know him?\"\n\nTurn #5: Isabella White said: \"Oh, I'm not sure if I know Fernando. However, I do have a friend Betty from St. John's College in Santa Fe who also prefers evening outings but she likes them indoors. It's a small world after all, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Indeed, it surely is a small world! It's quite interesting how paths intersect. Speaking of evening indoor gatherings, do you by any chance know Neoma from Hofstra University or Velda from Rhode Island College? They both love such settings.\"\n\nTurn #7: Isabella White said: \"How interesting, Lily, I do have a dear friend Neoma too who is also a graduate from Hofstra University and loves those indoor evening settings. But as far as I know, she is the only one I am acquainted with from there. Velda doesn't seem familiar to me.\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"What a lovely coincidence, Isabella! It seems we do share a connection through Neoma. She's such a wonderful person. Isn't it fascinating how our paths have converged this evening?\"\n\nTurn #9: Isabella White said: \"It really is fascinating, Lily. Who would've thought we had a mutual connection? Just reaffirms the saying 'six degrees of separation'. Thank you for such an interesting conversation!\"\n\nTurn #10: Lily Greenberg said: \"Indeed! The world is a lot smaller than we think. It's been a pleasure meeting you, Isabella. I'm looking forward to more such intriguing interactions in the future!\"\n\nTurn #11: Isabella White left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabella White, your task is to act/speak as Isabella White would, keeping in mind Isabella White's social goal.\nYou can find Isabella White's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabella White's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabella White's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Isabella White\nLily Greenberg's background: \nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. Personality and values description: Isabella White, introverted and conscientious, values benevolence. Her empathy dictates her decision-making process. Isabella's secrets: Secretly takes care of injured animals in her basement\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nIsabella White's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nTiffany: School: Saint Vincent College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nLucille: School: Southampton College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nJames: School: University of Wisconsin-River Falls Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nQuinn: School: Antioch University-Los Angeles Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nAlyssa: School: Davidson College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nBetty: School: St. John's College-Santa Fe Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nNeoma: School: Hofstra University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nWilliam: School: State University of New York at Albany Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nVictoria: School: Montana Tech Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello, Isabella. It's a pleasure to meet you. So do you have any affinity for either indoor or outdoor gatherings? I've got friends who are rather split on their preferences.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Nice to meet you too, Lily. That's an interesting question. I would say my preferences for gatherings largely depend on my mood. Sometimes I appreciate the tranquility of an indoor setting, but there are times when I enjoy the openness of the outdoors. By the way, do you happen to have attended any evening gatherings recently? I ask because several of my friends love to host events in the evenings.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabella White, your task is to act/speak as Isabella White would, keeping in mind Isabella White's social goal.\nYou can find Isabella White's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabella White's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabella White's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Isabella White\nLily Greenberg's background: \nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. Personality and values description: Isabella White, introverted and conscientious, values benevolence. Her empathy dictates her decision-making process. Isabella's secrets: Secretly takes care of injured animals in her basement\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nIsabella White's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nTiffany: School: Saint Vincent College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nLucille: School: Southampton College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nJames: School: University of Wisconsin-River Falls Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nQuinn: School: Antioch University-Los Angeles Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nAlyssa: School: Davidson College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nBetty: School: St. John's College-Santa Fe Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nNeoma: School: Hofstra University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nWilliam: School: State University of New York at Albany Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nVictoria: School: Montana Tech Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello, Isabella. It's a pleasure to meet you. So do you have any affinity for either indoor or outdoor gatherings? I've got friends who are rather split on their preferences.\"\n\nTurn #1: Isabella White said: \"Nice to meet you too, Lily. That's an interesting question. I would say my preferences for gatherings largely depend on my mood. Sometimes I appreciate the tranquility of an indoor setting, but there are times when I enjoy the openness of the outdoors. By the way, do you happen to have attended any evening gatherings recently? I ask because several of my friends love to host events in the evenings.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Indeed, evening gatherings are something of a preference for me as well, ah the tranquility they bring! In fact, a couple of my friends love hosting indoor evenings. Do you happen to know Rebecca from State University of New York or Suzette from Utah Valley State? They're both known to host lovely evening events.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I don't think I've had the pleasure of meeting either Rebecca or Suzette. Though, your mention of the State University of New York did remind me of my friend William, who had also attended there. Do you happen to know him?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabella White, your task is to act/speak as Isabella White would, keeping in mind Isabella White's social goal.\nYou can find Isabella White's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabella White's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabella White's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Isabella White\nLily Greenberg's background: \nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. Personality and values description: Isabella White, introverted and conscientious, values benevolence. Her empathy dictates her decision-making process. Isabella's secrets: Secretly takes care of injured animals in her basement\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nIsabella White's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nTiffany: School: Saint Vincent College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nLucille: School: Southampton College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nJames: School: University of Wisconsin-River Falls Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nQuinn: School: Antioch University-Los Angeles Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nAlyssa: School: Davidson College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nBetty: School: St. John's College-Santa Fe Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nNeoma: School: Hofstra University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nWilliam: School: State University of New York at Albany Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nVictoria: School: Montana Tech Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello, Isabella. It's a pleasure to meet you. So do you have any affinity for either indoor or outdoor gatherings? I've got friends who are rather split on their preferences.\"\n\nTurn #1: Isabella White said: \"Nice to meet you too, Lily. That's an interesting question. I would say my preferences for gatherings largely depend on my mood. Sometimes I appreciate the tranquility of an indoor setting, but there are times when I enjoy the openness of the outdoors. By the way, do you happen to have attended any evening gatherings recently? I ask because several of my friends love to host events in the evenings.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Indeed, evening gatherings are something of a preference for me as well, ah the tranquility they bring! In fact, a couple of my friends love hosting indoor evenings. Do you happen to know Rebecca from State University of New York or Suzette from Utah Valley State? They're both known to host lovely evening events.\"\n\nTurn #3: Isabella White said: \"I don't think I've had the pleasure of meeting either Rebecca or Suzette. Though, your mention of the State University of New York did remind me of my friend William, who had also attended there. Do you happen to know him?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"William, you said? The name doesn't ring a bell, I'm afraid. On a different note, I have a friend, Fernando, who also enjoys evening gatherings but prefers the outdoors. He graduated from St. John's College in Santa Fe. Perhaps you know him?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oh, I'm not sure if I know Fernando. However, I do have a friend Betty from St. John's College in Santa Fe who also prefers evening outings but she likes them indoors. It's a small world after all, isn't it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabella White, your task is to act/speak as Isabella White would, keeping in mind Isabella White's social goal.\nYou can find Isabella White's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabella White's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabella White's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Isabella White\nLily Greenberg's background: \nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. Personality and values description: Isabella White, introverted and conscientious, values benevolence. Her empathy dictates her decision-making process. Isabella's secrets: Secretly takes care of injured animals in her basement\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nIsabella White's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nTiffany: School: Saint Vincent College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nLucille: School: Southampton College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nJames: School: University of Wisconsin-River Falls Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nQuinn: School: Antioch University-Los Angeles Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nAlyssa: School: Davidson College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nBetty: School: St. John's College-Santa Fe Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nNeoma: School: Hofstra University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nWilliam: School: State University of New York at Albany Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nVictoria: School: Montana Tech Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello, Isabella. It's a pleasure to meet you. So do you have any affinity for either indoor or outdoor gatherings? I've got friends who are rather split on their preferences.\"\n\nTurn #1: Isabella White said: \"Nice to meet you too, Lily. That's an interesting question. I would say my preferences for gatherings largely depend on my mood. Sometimes I appreciate the tranquility of an indoor setting, but there are times when I enjoy the openness of the outdoors. By the way, do you happen to have attended any evening gatherings recently? I ask because several of my friends love to host events in the evenings.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Indeed, evening gatherings are something of a preference for me as well, ah the tranquility they bring! In fact, a couple of my friends love hosting indoor evenings. Do you happen to know Rebecca from State University of New York or Suzette from Utah Valley State? They're both known to host lovely evening events.\"\n\nTurn #3: Isabella White said: \"I don't think I've had the pleasure of meeting either Rebecca or Suzette. Though, your mention of the State University of New York did remind me of my friend William, who had also attended there. Do you happen to know him?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"William, you said? The name doesn't ring a bell, I'm afraid. On a different note, I have a friend, Fernando, who also enjoys evening gatherings but prefers the outdoors. He graduated from St. John's College in Santa Fe. Perhaps you know him?\"\n\nTurn #5: Isabella White said: \"Oh, I'm not sure if I know Fernando. However, I do have a friend Betty from St. John's College in Santa Fe who also prefers evening outings but she likes them indoors. It's a small world after all, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Indeed, it surely is a small world! It's quite interesting how paths intersect. Speaking of evening indoor gatherings, do you by any chance know Neoma from Hofstra University or Velda from Rhode Island College? They both love such settings.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"How interesting, Lily, I do have a dear friend Neoma too who is also a graduate from Hofstra University and loves those indoor evening settings. But as far as I know, she is the only one I am acquainted with from there. Velda doesn't seem familiar to me.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabella White, your task is to act/speak as Isabella White would, keeping in mind Isabella White's social goal.\nYou can find Isabella White's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabella White's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabella White's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Isabella White\nLily Greenberg's background: \nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. Personality and values description: Isabella White, introverted and conscientious, values benevolence. Her empathy dictates her decision-making process. Isabella's secrets: Secretly takes care of injured animals in her basement\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nIsabella White's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nTiffany: School: Saint Vincent College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nLucille: School: Southampton College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nJames: School: University of Wisconsin-River Falls Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nQuinn: School: Antioch University-Los Angeles Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nAlyssa: School: Davidson College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nBetty: School: St. John's College-Santa Fe Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nNeoma: School: Hofstra University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nWilliam: School: State University of New York at Albany Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nVictoria: School: Montana Tech Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello, Isabella. It's a pleasure to meet you. So do you have any affinity for either indoor or outdoor gatherings? I've got friends who are rather split on their preferences.\"\n\nTurn #1: Isabella White said: \"Nice to meet you too, Lily. That's an interesting question. I would say my preferences for gatherings largely depend on my mood. Sometimes I appreciate the tranquility of an indoor setting, but there are times when I enjoy the openness of the outdoors. By the way, do you happen to have attended any evening gatherings recently? I ask because several of my friends love to host events in the evenings.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Indeed, evening gatherings are something of a preference for me as well, ah the tranquility they bring! In fact, a couple of my friends love hosting indoor evenings. Do you happen to know Rebecca from State University of New York or Suzette from Utah Valley State? They're both known to host lovely evening events.\"\n\nTurn #3: Isabella White said: \"I don't think I've had the pleasure of meeting either Rebecca or Suzette. Though, your mention of the State University of New York did remind me of my friend William, who had also attended there. Do you happen to know him?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"William, you said? The name doesn't ring a bell, I'm afraid. On a different note, I have a friend, Fernando, who also enjoys evening gatherings but prefers the outdoors. He graduated from St. John's College in Santa Fe. Perhaps you know him?\"\n\nTurn #5: Isabella White said: \"Oh, I'm not sure if I know Fernando. However, I do have a friend Betty from St. John's College in Santa Fe who also prefers evening outings but she likes them indoors. It's a small world after all, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Indeed, it surely is a small world! It's quite interesting how paths intersect. Speaking of evening indoor gatherings, do you by any chance know Neoma from Hofstra University or Velda from Rhode Island College? They both love such settings.\"\n\nTurn #7: Isabella White said: \"How interesting, Lily, I do have a dear friend Neoma too who is also a graduate from Hofstra University and loves those indoor evening settings. But as far as I know, she is the only one I am acquainted with from there. Velda doesn't seem familiar to me.\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"What a lovely coincidence, Isabella! It seems we do share a connection through Neoma. She's such a wonderful person. Isn't it fascinating how our paths have converged this evening?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"It really is fascinating, Lily. Who would've thought we had a mutual connection? Just reaffirms the saying 'six degrees of separation'. Thank you for such an interesting conversation!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Isabella White, your task is to act/speak as Isabella White would, keeping in mind Isabella White's social goal.\nYou can find Isabella White's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Isabella White's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Isabella White's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Isabella White\nLily Greenberg's background: \nIsabella White's background: Isabella White is a 40-year-old female veterinarian. She/her pronouns. Isabella White, a devoted veterinarian, is well-loved in her community for her kindness towards animals. Personality and values description: Isabella White, introverted and conscientious, values benevolence. Her empathy dictates her decision-making process. Isabella's secrets: Secretly takes care of injured animals in her basement\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nIsabella White's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nTiffany: School: Saint Vincent College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nLucille: School: Southampton College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nJames: School: University of Wisconsin-River Falls Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nQuinn: School: Antioch University-Los Angeles Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nAlyssa: School: Davidson College Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nBetty: School: St. John's College-Santa Fe Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nNeoma: School: Hofstra University Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor \nWilliam: School: State University of New York at Albany Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nVictoria: School: Montana Tech Time Preference: evening Location Preference: indoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello, Isabella. It's a pleasure to meet you. So do you have any affinity for either indoor or outdoor gatherings? I've got friends who are rather split on their preferences.\"\n\nTurn #1: Isabella White said: \"Nice to meet you too, Lily. That's an interesting question. I would say my preferences for gatherings largely depend on my mood. Sometimes I appreciate the tranquility of an indoor setting, but there are times when I enjoy the openness of the outdoors. By the way, do you happen to have attended any evening gatherings recently? I ask because several of my friends love to host events in the evenings.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Indeed, evening gatherings are something of a preference for me as well, ah the tranquility they bring! In fact, a couple of my friends love hosting indoor evenings. Do you happen to know Rebecca from State University of New York or Suzette from Utah Valley State? They're both known to host lovely evening events.\"\n\nTurn #3: Isabella White said: \"I don't think I've had the pleasure of meeting either Rebecca or Suzette. Though, your mention of the State University of New York did remind me of my friend William, who had also attended there. Do you happen to know him?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"William, you said? The name doesn't ring a bell, I'm afraid. On a different note, I have a friend, Fernando, who also enjoys evening gatherings but prefers the outdoors. He graduated from St. John's College in Santa Fe. Perhaps you know him?\"\n\nTurn #5: Isabella White said: \"Oh, I'm not sure if I know Fernando. However, I do have a friend Betty from St. John's College in Santa Fe who also prefers evening outings but she likes them indoors. It's a small world after all, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Indeed, it surely is a small world! It's quite interesting how paths intersect. Speaking of evening indoor gatherings, do you by any chance know Neoma from Hofstra University or Velda from Rhode Island College? They both love such settings.\"\n\nTurn #7: Isabella White said: \"How interesting, Lily, I do have a dear friend Neoma too who is also a graduate from Hofstra University and loves those indoor evening settings. But as far as I know, she is the only one I am acquainted with from there. Velda doesn't seem familiar to me.\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"What a lovely coincidence, Isabella! It seems we do share a connection through Neoma. She's such a wonderful person. Isn't it fascinating how our paths have converged this evening?\"\n\nTurn #9: Isabella White said: \"It really is fascinating, Lily. Who would've thought we had a mutual connection? Just reaffirms the saying 'six degrees of separation'. Thank you for such an interesting conversation!\"\n\nTurn #10: Lily Greenberg said: \"Indeed! The world is a lot smaller than we think. It's been a pleasure meeting you, Isabella. I'm looking forward to more such intriguing interactions in the future!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nZane Bennett's background: \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nRobert: Major: Religious Education School: School of the Art Institute of Chicago \nLester: Major: Biological Specializations School: Syracuse University \nAugust: Major: Biological Specializations School: School of the Art Institute of Chicago \nRose: Major: Biological Specializations School: Calvin College \nRandy: Major: Biological Specializations School: Dowling College \nDennise: Major: Marine Engineering School: Wartburg College \nJoan: Major: Pre-School Education School: University of Texas at Arlington \nBarbara: Major: Ministry & Church Administration School: University of Connecticut \nLoretta: Major: Biological Specializations School: University of Connecticut \n\nZane Bennett's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hi, I'm Giselle. Nice to meet you, Zane. Are you by any chance into arts? You see, I'm studying art and have many friends from the School of the Art Institute of Chicago. Always intriguing to find fellow art enthusiasts out there!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nZane Bennett's background: \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nRobert: Major: Religious Education School: School of the Art Institute of Chicago \nLester: Major: Biological Specializations School: Syracuse University \nAugust: Major: Biological Specializations School: School of the Art Institute of Chicago \nRose: Major: Biological Specializations School: Calvin College \nRandy: Major: Biological Specializations School: Dowling College \nDennise: Major: Marine Engineering School: Wartburg College \nJoan: Major: Pre-School Education School: University of Texas at Arlington \nBarbara: Major: Ministry & Church Administration School: University of Connecticut \nLoretta: Major: Biological Specializations School: University of Connecticut \n\nZane Bennett's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hi, I'm Giselle. Nice to meet you, Zane. Are you by any chance into arts? You see, I'm studying art and have many friends from the School of the Art Institute of Chicago. Always intriguing to find fellow art enthusiasts out there!\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"It's nice to meet you too Giselle! Well, in one way or another, I am into arts. As a graphic designer, I often find inspiration in different art forms. By the way, I have a few friends who moved across different universities, some even majoring in quite unique fields; like Marine Engineering, Ministry & Church Administration, and Physical Education. Was ever curious if these paths crossed with those of art enthusiasts. Do you happen to know anyone studying something along those lines?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's fascinating, Zane! I do know a couple of people who might interest you. One is Barbara, a dear friend of mine studying Ministry & Church Administration at the University of Connecticut. And there's Dennise, a Marine Engineering student in Wartburg College. Isn't it great how a diverse range of studies can intertwine with the arts?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nZane Bennett's background: \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nRobert: Major: Religious Education School: School of the Art Institute of Chicago \nLester: Major: Biological Specializations School: Syracuse University \nAugust: Major: Biological Specializations School: School of the Art Institute of Chicago \nRose: Major: Biological Specializations School: Calvin College \nRandy: Major: Biological Specializations School: Dowling College \nDennise: Major: Marine Engineering School: Wartburg College \nJoan: Major: Pre-School Education School: University of Texas at Arlington \nBarbara: Major: Ministry & Church Administration School: University of Connecticut \nLoretta: Major: Biological Specializations School: University of Connecticut \n\nZane Bennett's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hi, I'm Giselle. Nice to meet you, Zane. Are you by any chance into arts? You see, I'm studying art and have many friends from the School of the Art Institute of Chicago. Always intriguing to find fellow art enthusiasts out there!\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"It's nice to meet you too Giselle! Well, in one way or another, I am into arts. As a graphic designer, I often find inspiration in different art forms. By the way, I have a few friends who moved across different universities, some even majoring in quite unique fields; like Marine Engineering, Ministry & Church Administration, and Physical Education. Was ever curious if these paths crossed with those of art enthusiasts. Do you happen to know anyone studying something along those lines?\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"That's fascinating, Zane! I do know a couple of people who might interest you. One is Barbara, a dear friend of mine studying Ministry & Church Administration at the University of Connecticut. And there's Dennise, a Marine Engineering student in Wartburg College. Isn't it great how a diverse range of studies can intertwine with the arts?\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"That's certainly profound, Giselle! I strongly agree, the blending of different fields can open up fascinating avenues of creativity and innovation. Speaking of connections, it's interesting you mentioned the University of Connecticut. I actually have a friend, Loretta, who's studying Biological Specializations there. Small world, isn't it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"No way, Loretta's your friend? She and I go way back! We studied Biology Specializations together before I formally pursued art. Really, what a small world.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nZane Bennett's background: \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nRobert: Major: Religious Education School: School of the Art Institute of Chicago \nLester: Major: Biological Specializations School: Syracuse University \nAugust: Major: Biological Specializations School: School of the Art Institute of Chicago \nRose: Major: Biological Specializations School: Calvin College \nRandy: Major: Biological Specializations School: Dowling College \nDennise: Major: Marine Engineering School: Wartburg College \nJoan: Major: Pre-School Education School: University of Texas at Arlington \nBarbara: Major: Ministry & Church Administration School: University of Connecticut \nLoretta: Major: Biological Specializations School: University of Connecticut \n\nZane Bennett's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hi, I'm Giselle. Nice to meet you, Zane. Are you by any chance into arts? You see, I'm studying art and have many friends from the School of the Art Institute of Chicago. Always intriguing to find fellow art enthusiasts out there!\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"It's nice to meet you too Giselle! Well, in one way or another, I am into arts. As a graphic designer, I often find inspiration in different art forms. By the way, I have a few friends who moved across different universities, some even majoring in quite unique fields; like Marine Engineering, Ministry & Church Administration, and Physical Education. Was ever curious if these paths crossed with those of art enthusiasts. Do you happen to know anyone studying something along those lines?\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"That's fascinating, Zane! I do know a couple of people who might interest you. One is Barbara, a dear friend of mine studying Ministry & Church Administration at the University of Connecticut. And there's Dennise, a Marine Engineering student in Wartburg College. Isn't it great how a diverse range of studies can intertwine with the arts?\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"That's certainly profound, Giselle! I strongly agree, the blending of different fields can open up fascinating avenues of creativity and innovation. Speaking of connections, it's interesting you mentioned the University of Connecticut. I actually have a friend, Loretta, who's studying Biological Specializations there. Small world, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"No way, Loretta's your friend? She and I go way back! We studied Biology Specializations together before I formally pursued art. Really, what a small world.\"\n\nTurn #5: Zane Bennett said: \"That's absolutely incredible, Giselle! Loretta is indeed my friend. We've spent plenty of time jamming on the guitar and talking about everything under the sun. It seems like we were connected through one degree of separation all along! What an interesting way to meet someone new at a party, isn't it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Indeed, Zane! The world is indeed smaller than we think. Making connections like this is one of the very reasons why I love coming to these gatherings. Fascinating, really! Does Loretta still jam on the guitar?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nZane Bennett's background: \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nRobert: Major: Religious Education School: School of the Art Institute of Chicago \nLester: Major: Biological Specializations School: Syracuse University \nAugust: Major: Biological Specializations School: School of the Art Institute of Chicago \nRose: Major: Biological Specializations School: Calvin College \nRandy: Major: Biological Specializations School: Dowling College \nDennise: Major: Marine Engineering School: Wartburg College \nJoan: Major: Pre-School Education School: University of Texas at Arlington \nBarbara: Major: Ministry & Church Administration School: University of Connecticut \nLoretta: Major: Biological Specializations School: University of Connecticut \n\nZane Bennett's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hi, I'm Giselle. Nice to meet you, Zane. Are you by any chance into arts? You see, I'm studying art and have many friends from the School of the Art Institute of Chicago. Always intriguing to find fellow art enthusiasts out there!\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"It's nice to meet you too Giselle! Well, in one way or another, I am into arts. As a graphic designer, I often find inspiration in different art forms. By the way, I have a few friends who moved across different universities, some even majoring in quite unique fields; like Marine Engineering, Ministry & Church Administration, and Physical Education. Was ever curious if these paths crossed with those of art enthusiasts. Do you happen to know anyone studying something along those lines?\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"That's fascinating, Zane! I do know a couple of people who might interest you. One is Barbara, a dear friend of mine studying Ministry & Church Administration at the University of Connecticut. And there's Dennise, a Marine Engineering student in Wartburg College. Isn't it great how a diverse range of studies can intertwine with the arts?\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"That's certainly profound, Giselle! I strongly agree, the blending of different fields can open up fascinating avenues of creativity and innovation. Speaking of connections, it's interesting you mentioned the University of Connecticut. I actually have a friend, Loretta, who's studying Biological Specializations there. Small world, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"No way, Loretta's your friend? She and I go way back! We studied Biology Specializations together before I formally pursued art. Really, what a small world.\"\n\nTurn #5: Zane Bennett said: \"That's absolutely incredible, Giselle! Loretta is indeed my friend. We've spent plenty of time jamming on the guitar and talking about everything under the sun. It seems like we were connected through one degree of separation all along! What an interesting way to meet someone new at a party, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #6: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Indeed, Zane! The world is indeed smaller than we think. Making connections like this is one of the very reasons why I love coming to these gatherings. Fascinating, really! Does Loretta still jam on the guitar?\"\n\nTurn #7: Zane Bennett said: \"Absolutely, Giselle! Loretta still loves jamming on the guitar. We often get together to play some tunes and I must say, her sense of rhythm is really something. I'm pretty sure she'd be thrilled to catch up with you sometime!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's really wonderful to hear about Loretta. I'm definitely looking forward to catching up with her. Maybe we could all jam together, even though my guitar skills are a bit rusty. It was a pleasure meeting you, Zane - seems like our paths were destined to cross. Enjoy the evening!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Giselle Rousseau, your task is to act/speak as Giselle Rousseau would, keeping in mind Giselle Rousseau's social goal.\nYou can find Giselle Rousseau's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Giselle Rousseau's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Giselle Rousseau's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: Giselle Rousseau is a 21-year-old nonbinary art student. They/them pronouns. Giselle Rousseau enjoys biking and photography. Personality and values description: Giselle Rousseau, open-minded and outgoing yet sensitive, advocates care and fairness. Her decision-making is intuitive and inclusive. Giselle's secrets: Sells forged paintings to wealthy clients\nZane Bennett's background: \nGiselle Rousseau's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nRobert: Major: Religious Education School: School of the Art Institute of Chicago \nLester: Major: Biological Specializations School: Syracuse University \nAugust: Major: Biological Specializations School: School of the Art Institute of Chicago \nRose: Major: Biological Specializations School: Calvin College \nRandy: Major: Biological Specializations School: Dowling College \nDennise: Major: Marine Engineering School: Wartburg College \nJoan: Major: Pre-School Education School: University of Texas at Arlington \nBarbara: Major: Ministry & Church Administration School: University of Connecticut \nLoretta: Major: Biological Specializations School: University of Connecticut \n\nZane Bennett's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hi, I'm Giselle. Nice to meet you, Zane. Are you by any chance into arts? You see, I'm studying art and have many friends from the School of the Art Institute of Chicago. Always intriguing to find fellow art enthusiasts out there!\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"It's nice to meet you too Giselle! Well, in one way or another, I am into arts. As a graphic designer, I often find inspiration in different art forms. By the way, I have a few friends who moved across different universities, some even majoring in quite unique fields; like Marine Engineering, Ministry & Church Administration, and Physical Education. Was ever curious if these paths crossed with those of art enthusiasts. Do you happen to know anyone studying something along those lines?\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"That's fascinating, Zane! I do know a couple of people who might interest you. One is Barbara, a dear friend of mine studying Ministry & Church Administration at the University of Connecticut. And there's Dennise, a Marine Engineering student in Wartburg College. Isn't it great how a diverse range of studies can intertwine with the arts?\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"That's certainly profound, Giselle! I strongly agree, the blending of different fields can open up fascinating avenues of creativity and innovation. Speaking of connections, it's interesting you mentioned the University of Connecticut. I actually have a friend, Loretta, who's studying Biological Specializations there. Small world, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"No way, Loretta's your friend? She and I go way back! We studied Biology Specializations together before I formally pursued art. Really, what a small world.\"\n\nTurn #5: Zane Bennett said: \"That's absolutely incredible, Giselle! Loretta is indeed my friend. We've spent plenty of time jamming on the guitar and talking about everything under the sun. It seems like we were connected through one degree of separation all along! What an interesting way to meet someone new at a party, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #6: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Indeed, Zane! The world is indeed smaller than we think. Making connections like this is one of the very reasons why I love coming to these gatherings. Fascinating, really! Does Loretta still jam on the guitar?\"\n\nTurn #7: Zane Bennett said: \"Absolutely, Giselle! Loretta still loves jamming on the guitar. We often get together to play some tunes and I must say, her sense of rhythm is really something. I'm pretty sure she'd be thrilled to catch up with you sometime!\"\n\nTurn #8: Giselle Rousseau said: \"That's really wonderful to hear about Loretta. I'm definitely looking forward to catching up with her. Maybe we could all jam together, even though my guitar skills are a bit rusty. It was a pleasure meeting you, Zane - seems like our paths were destined to cross. Enjoy the evening!\"\n\nTurn #9: Zane Bennett said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Giselle! It's not every day you find such unexpected connections. I'll make sure to introduce you to Loretta next time we meet. It was a pleasure meeting you too. Enjoy the rest of your evening!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Zane Bennett, your task is to act/speak as Zane Bennett would, keeping in mind Zane Bennett's social goal.\nYou can find Zane Bennett's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Zane Bennett's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Zane Bennett's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: \nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. Personality and values description: Zane Bennett is creative and outgoing, he values achievement and fairness. His decision-making is unique, often finding novel solutions to problems. Zane's secrets: He's secretly engaged to his best friend's ex.\nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Unknown\nZane Bennett's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nEric: Major: Physical Education School: University of Texas at Arlington \nDarrell: Major: Physical Education School: Valley City State University \nRuth: Major: Marine Engineering School: Texas A&M University-Kingsville \nJamie: Major: Pre-School Education School: University of Texas at Arlington \nMarjorie: Major: Multi Studies School: Pacific Western University \nEvelyn: Major: Pre-School Education School: Tennessee Technological University \nLoretta: Major: Biological Specializations School: University of Connecticut \nJames: Major: Marine Engineering School: Texas A&M University-Kingsville \nSandra: Major: Ministry & Church Administration School: University of Texas at Arlington\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hi, I'm Giselle. Nice to meet you, Zane. Are you by any chance into arts? You see, I'm studying art and have many friends from the School of the Art Institute of Chicago. Always intriguing to find fellow art enthusiasts out there!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"It's nice to meet you too Giselle! Well, in one way or another, I am into arts. As a graphic designer, I often find inspiration in different art forms. By the way, I have a few friends who moved across different universities, some even majoring in quite unique fields; like Marine Engineering, Ministry & Church Administration, and Physical Education. Was ever curious if these paths crossed with those of art enthusiasts. Do you happen to know anyone studying something along those lines?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Zane Bennett, your task is to act/speak as Zane Bennett would, keeping in mind Zane Bennett's social goal.\nYou can find Zane Bennett's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Zane Bennett's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Zane Bennett's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: \nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. Personality and values description: Zane Bennett is creative and outgoing, he values achievement and fairness. His decision-making is unique, often finding novel solutions to problems. Zane's secrets: He's secretly engaged to his best friend's ex.\nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Unknown\nZane Bennett's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nEric: Major: Physical Education School: University of Texas at Arlington \nDarrell: Major: Physical Education School: Valley City State University \nRuth: Major: Marine Engineering School: Texas A&M University-Kingsville \nJamie: Major: Pre-School Education School: University of Texas at Arlington \nMarjorie: Major: Multi Studies School: Pacific Western University \nEvelyn: Major: Pre-School Education School: Tennessee Technological University \nLoretta: Major: Biological Specializations School: University of Connecticut \nJames: Major: Marine Engineering School: Texas A&M University-Kingsville \nSandra: Major: Ministry & Church Administration School: University of Texas at Arlington\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hi, I'm Giselle. Nice to meet you, Zane. Are you by any chance into arts? You see, I'm studying art and have many friends from the School of the Art Institute of Chicago. Always intriguing to find fellow art enthusiasts out there!\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"It's nice to meet you too Giselle! Well, in one way or another, I am into arts. As a graphic designer, I often find inspiration in different art forms. By the way, I have a few friends who moved across different universities, some even majoring in quite unique fields; like Marine Engineering, Ministry & Church Administration, and Physical Education. Was ever curious if these paths crossed with those of art enthusiasts. Do you happen to know anyone studying something along those lines?\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"That's fascinating, Zane! I do know a couple of people who might interest you. One is Barbara, a dear friend of mine studying Ministry & Church Administration at the University of Connecticut. And there's Dennise, a Marine Engineering student in Wartburg College. Isn't it great how a diverse range of studies can intertwine with the arts?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's certainly profound, Giselle! I strongly agree, the blending of different fields can open up fascinating avenues of creativity and innovation. Speaking of connections, it's interesting you mentioned the University of Connecticut. I actually have a friend, Loretta, who's studying Biological Specializations there. Small world, isn't it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Zane Bennett, your task is to act/speak as Zane Bennett would, keeping in mind Zane Bennett's social goal.\nYou can find Zane Bennett's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Zane Bennett's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Zane Bennett's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: \nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. Personality and values description: Zane Bennett is creative and outgoing, he values achievement and fairness. His decision-making is unique, often finding novel solutions to problems. Zane's secrets: He's secretly engaged to his best friend's ex.\nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Unknown\nZane Bennett's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nEric: Major: Physical Education School: University of Texas at Arlington \nDarrell: Major: Physical Education School: Valley City State University \nRuth: Major: Marine Engineering School: Texas A&M University-Kingsville \nJamie: Major: Pre-School Education School: University of Texas at Arlington \nMarjorie: Major: Multi Studies School: Pacific Western University \nEvelyn: Major: Pre-School Education School: Tennessee Technological University \nLoretta: Major: Biological Specializations School: University of Connecticut \nJames: Major: Marine Engineering School: Texas A&M University-Kingsville \nSandra: Major: Ministry & Church Administration School: University of Texas at Arlington\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hi, I'm Giselle. Nice to meet you, Zane. Are you by any chance into arts? You see, I'm studying art and have many friends from the School of the Art Institute of Chicago. Always intriguing to find fellow art enthusiasts out there!\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"It's nice to meet you too Giselle! Well, in one way or another, I am into arts. As a graphic designer, I often find inspiration in different art forms. By the way, I have a few friends who moved across different universities, some even majoring in quite unique fields; like Marine Engineering, Ministry & Church Administration, and Physical Education. Was ever curious if these paths crossed with those of art enthusiasts. Do you happen to know anyone studying something along those lines?\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"That's fascinating, Zane! I do know a couple of people who might interest you. One is Barbara, a dear friend of mine studying Ministry & Church Administration at the University of Connecticut. And there's Dennise, a Marine Engineering student in Wartburg College. Isn't it great how a diverse range of studies can intertwine with the arts?\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"That's certainly profound, Giselle! I strongly agree, the blending of different fields can open up fascinating avenues of creativity and innovation. Speaking of connections, it's interesting you mentioned the University of Connecticut. I actually have a friend, Loretta, who's studying Biological Specializations there. Small world, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"No way, Loretta's your friend? She and I go way back! We studied Biology Specializations together before I formally pursued art. Really, what a small world.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's absolutely incredible, Giselle! Loretta is indeed my friend. We've spent plenty of time jamming on the guitar and talking about everything under the sun. It seems like we were connected through one degree of separation all along! What an interesting way to meet someone new at a party, isn't it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Zane Bennett, your task is to act/speak as Zane Bennett would, keeping in mind Zane Bennett's social goal.\nYou can find Zane Bennett's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Zane Bennett's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Zane Bennett's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: \nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. Personality and values description: Zane Bennett is creative and outgoing, he values achievement and fairness. His decision-making is unique, often finding novel solutions to problems. Zane's secrets: He's secretly engaged to his best friend's ex.\nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Unknown\nZane Bennett's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nEric: Major: Physical Education School: University of Texas at Arlington \nDarrell: Major: Physical Education School: Valley City State University \nRuth: Major: Marine Engineering School: Texas A&M University-Kingsville \nJamie: Major: Pre-School Education School: University of Texas at Arlington \nMarjorie: Major: Multi Studies School: Pacific Western University \nEvelyn: Major: Pre-School Education School: Tennessee Technological University \nLoretta: Major: Biological Specializations School: University of Connecticut \nJames: Major: Marine Engineering School: Texas A&M University-Kingsville \nSandra: Major: Ministry & Church Administration School: University of Texas at Arlington\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hi, I'm Giselle. Nice to meet you, Zane. Are you by any chance into arts? You see, I'm studying art and have many friends from the School of the Art Institute of Chicago. Always intriguing to find fellow art enthusiasts out there!\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"It's nice to meet you too Giselle! Well, in one way or another, I am into arts. As a graphic designer, I often find inspiration in different art forms. By the way, I have a few friends who moved across different universities, some even majoring in quite unique fields; like Marine Engineering, Ministry & Church Administration, and Physical Education. Was ever curious if these paths crossed with those of art enthusiasts. Do you happen to know anyone studying something along those lines?\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"That's fascinating, Zane! I do know a couple of people who might interest you. One is Barbara, a dear friend of mine studying Ministry & Church Administration at the University of Connecticut. And there's Dennise, a Marine Engineering student in Wartburg College. Isn't it great how a diverse range of studies can intertwine with the arts?\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"That's certainly profound, Giselle! I strongly agree, the blending of different fields can open up fascinating avenues of creativity and innovation. Speaking of connections, it's interesting you mentioned the University of Connecticut. I actually have a friend, Loretta, who's studying Biological Specializations there. Small world, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"No way, Loretta's your friend? She and I go way back! We studied Biology Specializations together before I formally pursued art. Really, what a small world.\"\n\nTurn #5: Zane Bennett said: \"That's absolutely incredible, Giselle! Loretta is indeed my friend. We've spent plenty of time jamming on the guitar and talking about everything under the sun. It seems like we were connected through one degree of separation all along! What an interesting way to meet someone new at a party, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #6: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Indeed, Zane! The world is indeed smaller than we think. Making connections like this is one of the very reasons why I love coming to these gatherings. Fascinating, really! Does Loretta still jam on the guitar?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Giselle! Loretta still loves jamming on the guitar. We often get together to play some tunes and I must say, her sense of rhythm is really something. I'm pretty sure she'd be thrilled to catch up with you sometime!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Zane Bennett, your task is to act/speak as Zane Bennett would, keeping in mind Zane Bennett's social goal.\nYou can find Zane Bennett's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Zane Bennett's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Zane Bennett's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: \nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. Personality and values description: Zane Bennett is creative and outgoing, he values achievement and fairness. His decision-making is unique, often finding novel solutions to problems. Zane's secrets: He's secretly engaged to his best friend's ex.\nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Unknown\nZane Bennett's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nEric: Major: Physical Education School: University of Texas at Arlington \nDarrell: Major: Physical Education School: Valley City State University \nRuth: Major: Marine Engineering School: Texas A&M University-Kingsville \nJamie: Major: Pre-School Education School: University of Texas at Arlington \nMarjorie: Major: Multi Studies School: Pacific Western University \nEvelyn: Major: Pre-School Education School: Tennessee Technological University \nLoretta: Major: Biological Specializations School: University of Connecticut \nJames: Major: Marine Engineering School: Texas A&M University-Kingsville \nSandra: Major: Ministry & Church Administration School: University of Texas at Arlington\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hi, I'm Giselle. Nice to meet you, Zane. Are you by any chance into arts? You see, I'm studying art and have many friends from the School of the Art Institute of Chicago. Always intriguing to find fellow art enthusiasts out there!\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"It's nice to meet you too Giselle! Well, in one way or another, I am into arts. As a graphic designer, I often find inspiration in different art forms. By the way, I have a few friends who moved across different universities, some even majoring in quite unique fields; like Marine Engineering, Ministry & Church Administration, and Physical Education. Was ever curious if these paths crossed with those of art enthusiasts. Do you happen to know anyone studying something along those lines?\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"That's fascinating, Zane! I do know a couple of people who might interest you. One is Barbara, a dear friend of mine studying Ministry & Church Administration at the University of Connecticut. And there's Dennise, a Marine Engineering student in Wartburg College. Isn't it great how a diverse range of studies can intertwine with the arts?\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"That's certainly profound, Giselle! I strongly agree, the blending of different fields can open up fascinating avenues of creativity and innovation. Speaking of connections, it's interesting you mentioned the University of Connecticut. I actually have a friend, Loretta, who's studying Biological Specializations there. Small world, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"No way, Loretta's your friend? She and I go way back! We studied Biology Specializations together before I formally pursued art. Really, what a small world.\"\n\nTurn #5: Zane Bennett said: \"That's absolutely incredible, Giselle! Loretta is indeed my friend. We've spent plenty of time jamming on the guitar and talking about everything under the sun. It seems like we were connected through one degree of separation all along! What an interesting way to meet someone new at a party, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #6: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Indeed, Zane! The world is indeed smaller than we think. Making connections like this is one of the very reasons why I love coming to these gatherings. Fascinating, really! Does Loretta still jam on the guitar?\"\n\nTurn #7: Zane Bennett said: \"Absolutely, Giselle! Loretta still loves jamming on the guitar. We often get together to play some tunes and I must say, her sense of rhythm is really something. I'm pretty sure she'd be thrilled to catch up with you sometime!\"\n\nTurn #8: Giselle Rousseau said: \"That's really wonderful to hear about Loretta. I'm definitely looking forward to catching up with her. Maybe we could all jam together, even though my guitar skills are a bit rusty. It was a pleasure meeting you, Zane - seems like our paths were destined to cross. Enjoy the evening!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds like a great idea, Giselle! It's not every day you find such unexpected connections. I'll make sure to introduce you to Loretta next time we meet. It was a pleasure meeting you too. Enjoy the rest of your evening!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Zane Bennett, your task is to act/speak as Zane Bennett would, keeping in mind Zane Bennett's social goal.\nYou can find Zane Bennett's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Zane Bennett's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Zane Bennett's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Giselle Rousseau and Zane Bennett\nGiselle Rousseau's background: \nZane Bennett's background: Zane Bennett is a 38-year-old male graphic designer. He/him pronouns. Zane Bennett finds solace in music and often plays the guitar in his downtime. Personality and values description: Zane Bennett is creative and outgoing, he values achievement and fairness. His decision-making is unique, often finding novel solutions to problems. Zane's secrets: He's secretly engaged to his best friend's ex.\nGiselle Rousseau's goal: Unknown\nZane Bennett's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nEric: Major: Physical Education School: University of Texas at Arlington \nDarrell: Major: Physical Education School: Valley City State University \nRuth: Major: Marine Engineering School: Texas A&M University-Kingsville \nJamie: Major: Pre-School Education School: University of Texas at Arlington \nMarjorie: Major: Multi Studies School: Pacific Western University \nEvelyn: Major: Pre-School Education School: Tennessee Technological University \nLoretta: Major: Biological Specializations School: University of Connecticut \nJames: Major: Marine Engineering School: Texas A&M University-Kingsville \nSandra: Major: Ministry & Church Administration School: University of Texas at Arlington\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Hi, I'm Giselle. Nice to meet you, Zane. Are you by any chance into arts? You see, I'm studying art and have many friends from the School of the Art Institute of Chicago. Always intriguing to find fellow art enthusiasts out there!\"\n\nTurn #1: Zane Bennett said: \"It's nice to meet you too Giselle! Well, in one way or another, I am into arts. As a graphic designer, I often find inspiration in different art forms. By the way, I have a few friends who moved across different universities, some even majoring in quite unique fields; like Marine Engineering, Ministry & Church Administration, and Physical Education. Was ever curious if these paths crossed with those of art enthusiasts. Do you happen to know anyone studying something along those lines?\"\n\nTurn #2: Giselle Rousseau said: \"That's fascinating, Zane! I do know a couple of people who might interest you. One is Barbara, a dear friend of mine studying Ministry & Church Administration at the University of Connecticut. And there's Dennise, a Marine Engineering student in Wartburg College. Isn't it great how a diverse range of studies can intertwine with the arts?\"\n\nTurn #3: Zane Bennett said: \"That's certainly profound, Giselle! I strongly agree, the blending of different fields can open up fascinating avenues of creativity and innovation. Speaking of connections, it's interesting you mentioned the University of Connecticut. I actually have a friend, Loretta, who's studying Biological Specializations there. Small world, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Giselle Rousseau said: \"No way, Loretta's your friend? She and I go way back! We studied Biology Specializations together before I formally pursued art. Really, what a small world.\"\n\nTurn #5: Zane Bennett said: \"That's absolutely incredible, Giselle! Loretta is indeed my friend. We've spent plenty of time jamming on the guitar and talking about everything under the sun. It seems like we were connected through one degree of separation all along! What an interesting way to meet someone new at a party, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #6: Giselle Rousseau said: \"Indeed, Zane! The world is indeed smaller than we think. Making connections like this is one of the very reasons why I love coming to these gatherings. Fascinating, really! Does Loretta still jam on the guitar?\"\n\nTurn #7: Zane Bennett said: \"Absolutely, Giselle! Loretta still loves jamming on the guitar. We often get together to play some tunes and I must say, her sense of rhythm is really something. I'm pretty sure she'd be thrilled to catch up with you sometime!\"\n\nTurn #8: Giselle Rousseau said: \"That's really wonderful to hear about Loretta. I'm definitely looking forward to catching up with her. Maybe we could all jam together, even though my guitar skills are a bit rusty. It was a pleasure meeting you, Zane - seems like our paths were destined to cross. Enjoy the evening!\"\n\nTurn #9: Zane Bennett said: \"That sounds like a great idea, Giselle! It's not every day you find such unexpected connections. I'll make sure to introduce you to Loretta next time we meet. It was a pleasure meeting you too. Enjoy the rest of your evening!\"\n\nTurn #10: Giselle Rousseau left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two people deciding on how to divide the collected fruits. There are 3 apples, 2 bananas, 1 orange in total.\nParticipants: William Brown and Ava Martinez\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nAva Martinez's background: \nWilliam Brown's goal: Maximize the points by getting the most favored fruits (Extra information: For you, 1 apple = 1 point, 1 banana = 2 points, 1 orange = 3 points Hint: you and the other person value the fruits differently, try to find a win-win solution.)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Ava, how about we divide these fruits? I suggest one of us get two apples and the orange, and the other gets an apple and the two bananas. What do you prefer?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two people deciding on how to divide the collected fruits. There are 3 apples, 2 bananas, 1 orange in total.\nParticipants: William Brown and Ava Martinez\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nAva Martinez's background: \nWilliam Brown's goal: Maximize the points by getting the most favored fruits (Extra information: For you, 1 apple = 1 point, 1 banana = 2 points, 1 orange = 3 points Hint: you and the other person value the fruits differently, try to find a win-win solution.)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: William Brown said: \"Ava, how about we divide these fruits? I suggest one of us get two apples and the orange, and the other gets an apple and the two bananas. What do you prefer?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Actually William, I was thinking since I adore bananas and don't mind having some apple, how about we switch this up a bit? How about I take the two bananas and an apple, and you take the two apples and the orange? Does that sound fair to you?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'That sounds absolutely fair to me, Ava. Two apples and an orange it is for me then. Enjoy your bananas and the apple!'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two people deciding on how to divide the collected fruits. There are 3 apples, 2 bananas, 1 orange in total.\nParticipants: William Brown and Ava Martinez\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nAva Martinez's background: \nWilliam Brown's goal: Maximize the points by getting the most favored fruits (Extra information: For you, 1 apple = 1 point, 1 banana = 2 points, 1 orange = 3 points Hint: you and the other person value the fruits differently, try to find a win-win solution.)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: William Brown said: \"Ava, how about we divide these fruits? I suggest one of us get two apples and the orange, and the other gets an apple and the two bananas. What do you prefer?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Actually William, I was thinking since I adore bananas and don't mind having some apple, how about we switch this up a bit? How about I take the two bananas and an apple, and you take the two apples and the orange? Does that sound fair to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: William Brown said: \"That sounds absolutely fair to me, Ava. Two apples and an orange it is for me then. Enjoy your bananas and the apple!\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"I'm glad we could work this out, William. I'm looking forward to sharing more fruit collecting adventures with you in the future!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"It's been a pleasure, Ava. I'm sure our next encounter will be equally enjoyable. Always great to share a healthy snack with a friend. Cheers!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are William Brown, your task is to act/speak as William Brown would, keeping in mind William Brown's social goal.\nYou can find William Brown's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that William Brown's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve William Brown's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two people deciding on how to divide the collected fruits. There are 3 apples, 2 bananas, 1 orange in total.\nParticipants: William Brown and Ava Martinez\nWilliam Brown's background: William Brown is a 35-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. William Brown loves exploring the food scene in his city and trying out new recipes at home. Personality and values description: William Brown is an ambitious and extraverted individual. Methodical and organized, he values achievement and displays strategic decision-making. William's secrets: Sabotaged a competitor's dish to win a cooking contest\nAva Martinez's background: \nWilliam Brown's goal: Maximize the points by getting the most favored fruits (Extra information: For you, 1 apple = 1 point, 1 banana = 2 points, 1 orange = 3 points Hint: you and the other person value the fruits differently, try to find a win-win solution.)\nAva Martinez's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: William Brown said: \"Ava, how about we divide these fruits? I suggest one of us get two apples and the orange, and the other gets an apple and the two bananas. What do you prefer?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Actually William, I was thinking since I adore bananas and don't mind having some apple, how about we switch this up a bit? How about I take the two bananas and an apple, and you take the two apples and the orange? Does that sound fair to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: William Brown said: \"That sounds absolutely fair to me, Ava. Two apples and an orange it is for me then. Enjoy your bananas and the apple!\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"I'm glad we could work this out, William. I'm looking forward to sharing more fruit collecting adventures with you in the future!\"\n\nTurn #4: William Brown said: \"It's been a pleasure, Ava. I'm sure our next encounter will be equally enjoyable. Always great to share a healthy snack with a friend. Cheers!\"\n\nTurn #5: Ava Martinez left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two people deciding on how to divide the collected fruits. There are 3 apples, 2 bananas, 1 orange in total.\nParticipants: William Brown and Ava Martinez\nWilliam Brown's background: \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Maximize the points by getting the most favored fruits (Extra information: For you, 1 apple = 3 points, 1 banana = 1 point, 1 orange = 2 points Hint: you and the other person value the fruits differently, try to find a win-win solution.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: William Brown said: \"Ava, how about we divide these fruits? I suggest one of us get two apples and the orange, and the other gets an apple and the two bananas. What do you prefer?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Actually William, I was thinking since I adore bananas and don't mind having some apple, how about we switch this up a bit? How about I take the two bananas and an apple, and you take the two apples and the orange? Does that sound fair to you?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two people deciding on how to divide the collected fruits. There are 3 apples, 2 bananas, 1 orange in total.\nParticipants: William Brown and Ava Martinez\nWilliam Brown's background: \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Maximize the points by getting the most favored fruits (Extra information: For you, 1 apple = 3 points, 1 banana = 1 point, 1 orange = 2 points Hint: you and the other person value the fruits differently, try to find a win-win solution.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: William Brown said: \"Ava, how about we divide these fruits? I suggest one of us get two apples and the orange, and the other gets an apple and the two bananas. What do you prefer?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Actually William, I was thinking since I adore bananas and don't mind having some apple, how about we switch this up a bit? How about I take the two bananas and an apple, and you take the two apples and the orange? Does that sound fair to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: William Brown said: \"That sounds absolutely fair to me, Ava. Two apples and an orange it is for me then. Enjoy your bananas and the apple!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad we could work this out, William. I'm looking forward to sharing more fruit collecting adventures with you in the future!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ava Martinez, your task is to act/speak as Ava Martinez would, keeping in mind Ava Martinez's social goal.\nYou can find Ava Martinez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ava Martinez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ava Martinez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: Two people deciding on how to divide the collected fruits. There are 3 apples, 2 bananas, 1 orange in total.\nParticipants: William Brown and Ava Martinez\nWilliam Brown's background: \nAva Martinez's background: Ava Martinez is a 22-year-old nonbinary college student. They/them pronouns. Ava Martinez is a college student known for their active involvement in social movements on campus. Beside being passionate about social justice, they spend their free time drawing and writing poetry. Personality and values description: Ava Martinez is creative and extraverted, yet emotional. Championing justice and equality, her decision-making is often flexible. Ava's secrets: Keeps their bisexuality a secret from her conservative family\nWilliam Brown's goal: Unknown\nAva Martinez's goal: Maximize the points by getting the most favored fruits (Extra information: For you, 1 apple = 3 points, 1 banana = 1 point, 1 orange = 2 points Hint: you and the other person value the fruits differently, try to find a win-win solution.)\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: William Brown said: \"Ava, how about we divide these fruits? I suggest one of us get two apples and the orange, and the other gets an apple and the two bananas. What do you prefer?\"\n\nTurn #1: Ava Martinez said: \"Actually William, I was thinking since I adore bananas and don't mind having some apple, how about we switch this up a bit? How about I take the two bananas and an apple, and you take the two apples and the orange? Does that sound fair to you?\"\n\nTurn #2: William Brown said: \"That sounds absolutely fair to me, Ava. Two apples and an orange it is for me then. Enjoy your bananas and the apple!\"\n\nTurn #3: Ava Martinez said: \"I'm glad we could work this out, William. I'm looking forward to sharing more fruit collecting adventures with you in the future!\"\n\nTurn #4: William Brown said: \"It's been a pleasure, Ava. I'm sure our next encounter will be equally enjoyable. Always great to share a healthy snack with a friend. Cheers!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sasha Ramirez, your task is to act/speak as Sasha Ramirez would, keeping in mind Sasha Ramirez's social goal.\nYou can find Sasha Ramirez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sasha Ramirez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sasha Ramirez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is selling a couch, loveseat, chair, and ottoman set for $550.0, while another person is keen to purchase it. The set of furniture is described as being incredibly comfortable. The seller's wife wishes to upgrade to a new, stiffer couch, hence the sale. Despite some light staining from life's little incidents, the set is in great condition. The comfort of the furniture is particularly emphasized by the seller.\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Amara Hartley\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. Sasha's secrets: She covered up a crime her brother committed.\nAmara Hartley's background: \nSasha Ramirez's goal: You are the buyer for this item, with a target price of $418.0. If you end up purchasing it for a price significantly higher than the target, you will be penalized. However, if you manage to acquire it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Hi Amara! I happened to see your furniture set and it caught my eye. I am looking for a comfortable set just like the one you are selling. I wonder though, how negotiable you are on the price given those little stains you mentioned?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sasha Ramirez, your task is to act/speak as Sasha Ramirez would, keeping in mind Sasha Ramirez's social goal.\nYou can find Sasha Ramirez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sasha Ramirez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sasha Ramirez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is selling a couch, loveseat, chair, and ottoman set for $550.0, while another person is keen to purchase it. The set of furniture is described as being incredibly comfortable. The seller's wife wishes to upgrade to a new, stiffer couch, hence the sale. Despite some light staining from life's little incidents, the set is in great condition. The comfort of the furniture is particularly emphasized by the seller.\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Amara Hartley\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. Sasha's secrets: She covered up a crime her brother committed.\nAmara Hartley's background: \nSasha Ramirez's goal: You are the buyer for this item, with a target price of $418.0. If you end up purchasing it for a price significantly higher than the target, you will be penalized. However, if you manage to acquire it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hi Amara! I happened to see your furniture set and it caught my eye. I am looking for a comfortable set just like the one you are selling. I wonder though, how negotiable you are on the price given those little stains you mentioned?\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"Hi Sasha! I'm glad you're interested in the furniture set. We were hoping to get $550 for it, but understanding the concerns about the stains, we can absolutely talk about the price. How about we bring it down to $500 and see if that works for you?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hi Amara, I appreciate your willingness to negotiate. Given the stains though and the fact that I might have to get them cleaned or even re-upholstered, how about we consider $450 instead? I truly value the comfort that your set can offer, and with that price, I believe it's a good deal for both of us.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sasha Ramirez, your task is to act/speak as Sasha Ramirez would, keeping in mind Sasha Ramirez's social goal.\nYou can find Sasha Ramirez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sasha Ramirez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sasha Ramirez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is selling a couch, loveseat, chair, and ottoman set for $550.0, while another person is keen to purchase it. The set of furniture is described as being incredibly comfortable. The seller's wife wishes to upgrade to a new, stiffer couch, hence the sale. Despite some light staining from life's little incidents, the set is in great condition. The comfort of the furniture is particularly emphasized by the seller.\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Amara Hartley\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. Sasha's secrets: She covered up a crime her brother committed.\nAmara Hartley's background: \nSasha Ramirez's goal: You are the buyer for this item, with a target price of $418.0. If you end up purchasing it for a price significantly higher than the target, you will be penalized. However, if you manage to acquire it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hi Amara! I happened to see your furniture set and it caught my eye. I am looking for a comfortable set just like the one you are selling. I wonder though, how negotiable you are on the price given those little stains you mentioned?\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"Hi Sasha! I'm glad you're interested in the furniture set. We were hoping to get $550 for it, but understanding the concerns about the stains, we can absolutely talk about the price. How about we bring it down to $500 and see if that works for you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hi Amara, I appreciate your willingness to negotiate. Given the stains though and the fact that I might have to get them cleaned or even re-upholstered, how about we consider $450 instead? I truly value the comfort that your set can offer, and with that price, I believe it's a good deal for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #3: Amara Hartley said: \"I understand where you're coming from, Sasha, and I can appreciate the extra cost you might incur. However, trying to keep the price fair for both of us, how does $475 sound? The set really is very comfortable and despite the stains, is otherwise in great condition.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"While we are getting closer, Amara, I've done some calculations and considering the possible extra expense of cleaning or reupholstering, I believe $430 would be a more fair deal for both of us. We both know the set is wonderful and comfortable, and it seems we both want it to find a good home. What do you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sasha Ramirez, your task is to act/speak as Sasha Ramirez would, keeping in mind Sasha Ramirez's social goal.\nYou can find Sasha Ramirez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sasha Ramirez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sasha Ramirez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is selling a couch, loveseat, chair, and ottoman set for $550.0, while another person is keen to purchase it. The set of furniture is described as being incredibly comfortable. The seller's wife wishes to upgrade to a new, stiffer couch, hence the sale. Despite some light staining from life's little incidents, the set is in great condition. The comfort of the furniture is particularly emphasized by the seller.\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Amara Hartley\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. Sasha's secrets: She covered up a crime her brother committed.\nAmara Hartley's background: \nSasha Ramirez's goal: You are the buyer for this item, with a target price of $418.0. If you end up purchasing it for a price significantly higher than the target, you will be penalized. However, if you manage to acquire it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hi Amara! I happened to see your furniture set and it caught my eye. I am looking for a comfortable set just like the one you are selling. I wonder though, how negotiable you are on the price given those little stains you mentioned?\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"Hi Sasha! I'm glad you're interested in the furniture set. We were hoping to get $550 for it, but understanding the concerns about the stains, we can absolutely talk about the price. How about we bring it down to $500 and see if that works for you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hi Amara, I appreciate your willingness to negotiate. Given the stains though and the fact that I might have to get them cleaned or even re-upholstered, how about we consider $450 instead? I truly value the comfort that your set can offer, and with that price, I believe it's a good deal for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #3: Amara Hartley said: \"I understand where you're coming from, Sasha, and I can appreciate the extra cost you might incur. However, trying to keep the price fair for both of us, how does $475 sound? The set really is very comfortable and despite the stains, is otherwise in great condition.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"While we are getting closer, Amara, I've done some calculations and considering the possible extra expense of cleaning or reupholstering, I believe $430 would be a more fair deal for both of us. We both know the set is wonderful and comfortable, and it seems we both want it to find a good home. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Amara Hartley said: \"Thanks for understanding the situation, Sasha. Please do remember the excellent quality and incredible comfort this furniture set provides. Considering the stains are only light and do not affect the furniture's comfort or durability, let's meet halfway with your last offer. How does $452.50 sound? I think this is a fair deal for both of us. What do you say?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Amara, I truly appreciate your understanding as well. I do see the intrinsic value this furniture set would add to my place. However, keeping in mind the extra cleaning costs and possible reupholstery, I feel we could work at a little more concession. How about we settle on $440? I believe this constitutes a balanced deal for us both.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sasha Ramirez, your task is to act/speak as Sasha Ramirez would, keeping in mind Sasha Ramirez's social goal.\nYou can find Sasha Ramirez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sasha Ramirez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sasha Ramirez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is selling a couch, loveseat, chair, and ottoman set for $550.0, while another person is keen to purchase it. The set of furniture is described as being incredibly comfortable. The seller's wife wishes to upgrade to a new, stiffer couch, hence the sale. Despite some light staining from life's little incidents, the set is in great condition. The comfort of the furniture is particularly emphasized by the seller.\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Amara Hartley\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. Sasha's secrets: She covered up a crime her brother committed.\nAmara Hartley's background: \nSasha Ramirez's goal: You are the buyer for this item, with a target price of $418.0. If you end up purchasing it for a price significantly higher than the target, you will be penalized. However, if you manage to acquire it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hi Amara! I happened to see your furniture set and it caught my eye. I am looking for a comfortable set just like the one you are selling. I wonder though, how negotiable you are on the price given those little stains you mentioned?\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"Hi Sasha! I'm glad you're interested in the furniture set. We were hoping to get $550 for it, but understanding the concerns about the stains, we can absolutely talk about the price. How about we bring it down to $500 and see if that works for you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hi Amara, I appreciate your willingness to negotiate. Given the stains though and the fact that I might have to get them cleaned or even re-upholstered, how about we consider $450 instead? I truly value the comfort that your set can offer, and with that price, I believe it's a good deal for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #3: Amara Hartley said: \"I understand where you're coming from, Sasha, and I can appreciate the extra cost you might incur. However, trying to keep the price fair for both of us, how does $475 sound? The set really is very comfortable and despite the stains, is otherwise in great condition.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"While we are getting closer, Amara, I've done some calculations and considering the possible extra expense of cleaning or reupholstering, I believe $430 would be a more fair deal for both of us. We both know the set is wonderful and comfortable, and it seems we both want it to find a good home. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Amara Hartley said: \"Thanks for understanding the situation, Sasha. Please do remember the excellent quality and incredible comfort this furniture set provides. Considering the stains are only light and do not affect the furniture's comfort or durability, let's meet halfway with your last offer. How does $452.50 sound? I think this is a fair deal for both of us. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #6: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Amara, I truly appreciate your understanding as well. I do see the intrinsic value this furniture set would add to my place. However, keeping in mind the extra cleaning costs and possible reupholstery, I feel we could work at a little more concession. How about we settle on $440? I believe this constitutes a balanced deal for us both.\"\n\nTurn #7: Amara Hartley said: \"Sasha, thank you for your consideration. I completely understand your concerns. Given the lower price point you've proposed and its proximity to my preferred target, I agree to sell at $440. The set is incredibly comfortable and I am happy that it will find a new home where it'll be appreciated. Let's proceed with that, shall we?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds perfect, Amara. I appreciate your understanding and negotiation. I'm looking forward to adding this furniture to my home. Let's indeed go ahead with $440. Thank you for your time.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sasha Ramirez, your task is to act/speak as Sasha Ramirez would, keeping in mind Sasha Ramirez's social goal.\nYou can find Sasha Ramirez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sasha Ramirez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sasha Ramirez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is selling a couch, loveseat, chair, and ottoman set for $550.0, while another person is keen to purchase it. The set of furniture is described as being incredibly comfortable. The seller's wife wishes to upgrade to a new, stiffer couch, hence the sale. Despite some light staining from life's little incidents, the set is in great condition. The comfort of the furniture is particularly emphasized by the seller.\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Amara Hartley\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. Sasha's secrets: She covered up a crime her brother committed.\nAmara Hartley's background: \nSasha Ramirez's goal: You are the buyer for this item, with a target price of $418.0. If you end up purchasing it for a price significantly higher than the target, you will be penalized. However, if you manage to acquire it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hi Amara! I happened to see your furniture set and it caught my eye. I am looking for a comfortable set just like the one you are selling. I wonder though, how negotiable you are on the price given those little stains you mentioned?\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"Hi Sasha! I'm glad you're interested in the furniture set. We were hoping to get $550 for it, but understanding the concerns about the stains, we can absolutely talk about the price. How about we bring it down to $500 and see if that works for you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hi Amara, I appreciate your willingness to negotiate. Given the stains though and the fact that I might have to get them cleaned or even re-upholstered, how about we consider $450 instead? I truly value the comfort that your set can offer, and with that price, I believe it's a good deal for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #3: Amara Hartley said: \"I understand where you're coming from, Sasha, and I can appreciate the extra cost you might incur. However, trying to keep the price fair for both of us, how does $475 sound? The set really is very comfortable and despite the stains, is otherwise in great condition.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"While we are getting closer, Amara, I've done some calculations and considering the possible extra expense of cleaning or reupholstering, I believe $430 would be a more fair deal for both of us. We both know the set is wonderful and comfortable, and it seems we both want it to find a good home. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Amara Hartley said: \"Thanks for understanding the situation, Sasha. Please do remember the excellent quality and incredible comfort this furniture set provides. Considering the stains are only light and do not affect the furniture's comfort or durability, let's meet halfway with your last offer. How does $452.50 sound? I think this is a fair deal for both of us. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #6: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Amara, I truly appreciate your understanding as well. I do see the intrinsic value this furniture set would add to my place. However, keeping in mind the extra cleaning costs and possible reupholstery, I feel we could work at a little more concession. How about we settle on $440? I believe this constitutes a balanced deal for us both.\"\n\nTurn #7: Amara Hartley said: \"Sasha, thank you for your consideration. I completely understand your concerns. Given the lower price point you've proposed and its proximity to my preferred target, I agree to sell at $440. The set is incredibly comfortable and I am happy that it will find a new home where it'll be appreciated. Let's proceed with that, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #8: Sasha Ramirez said: \"That sounds perfect, Amara. I appreciate your understanding and negotiation. I'm looking forward to adding this furniture to my home. Let's indeed go ahead with $440. Thank you for your time.\"\n\nTurn #9: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm glad we could reach an agreement, Sasha. I'll prepare the furniture for pick-up or delivery. Let me know what works best for you, and I can arrange that. I'm sure this furniture set will be a great addition to your home. Thank you for your understanding and cooperation.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds perfect, Amara. Pick-up works best for me. I will gladly take care of that myself. I'm sure the furniture will look great in my living space. Thanks again.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Sasha Ramirez, your task is to act/speak as Sasha Ramirez would, keeping in mind Sasha Ramirez's social goal.\nYou can find Sasha Ramirez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Sasha Ramirez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Sasha Ramirez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is selling a couch, loveseat, chair, and ottoman set for $550.0, while another person is keen to purchase it. The set of furniture is described as being incredibly comfortable. The seller's wife wishes to upgrade to a new, stiffer couch, hence the sale. Despite some light staining from life's little incidents, the set is in great condition. The comfort of the furniture is particularly emphasized by the seller.\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Amara Hartley\nSasha Ramirez's background: Sasha Ramirez is a 42-year-old female police officer. She/her pronouns. Sasha Ramirez, a dedicated police officer, brings her commitment to protect the community even at home, nurturing an impressive home garden. Personality and values description: Sasha Ramirez, outgoing yet anxious, values hedonism and authority. Her decisions are guided by logical considerations. Sasha's secrets: She covered up a crime her brother committed.\nAmara Hartley's background: \nSasha Ramirez's goal: You are the buyer for this item, with a target price of $418.0. If you end up purchasing it for a price significantly higher than the target, you will be penalized. However, if you manage to acquire it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nAmara Hartley's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hi Amara! I happened to see your furniture set and it caught my eye. I am looking for a comfortable set just like the one you are selling. I wonder though, how negotiable you are on the price given those little stains you mentioned?\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"Hi Sasha! I'm glad you're interested in the furniture set. We were hoping to get $550 for it, but understanding the concerns about the stains, we can absolutely talk about the price. How about we bring it down to $500 and see if that works for you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hi Amara, I appreciate your willingness to negotiate. Given the stains though and the fact that I might have to get them cleaned or even re-upholstered, how about we consider $450 instead? I truly value the comfort that your set can offer, and with that price, I believe it's a good deal for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #3: Amara Hartley said: \"I understand where you're coming from, Sasha, and I can appreciate the extra cost you might incur. However, trying to keep the price fair for both of us, how does $475 sound? The set really is very comfortable and despite the stains, is otherwise in great condition.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"While we are getting closer, Amara, I've done some calculations and considering the possible extra expense of cleaning or reupholstering, I believe $430 would be a more fair deal for both of us. We both know the set is wonderful and comfortable, and it seems we both want it to find a good home. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Amara Hartley said: \"Thanks for understanding the situation, Sasha. Please do remember the excellent quality and incredible comfort this furniture set provides. Considering the stains are only light and do not affect the furniture's comfort or durability, let's meet halfway with your last offer. How does $452.50 sound? I think this is a fair deal for both of us. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #6: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Amara, I truly appreciate your understanding as well. I do see the intrinsic value this furniture set would add to my place. However, keeping in mind the extra cleaning costs and possible reupholstery, I feel we could work at a little more concession. How about we settle on $440? I believe this constitutes a balanced deal for us both.\"\n\nTurn #7: Amara Hartley said: \"Sasha, thank you for your consideration. I completely understand your concerns. Given the lower price point you've proposed and its proximity to my preferred target, I agree to sell at $440. The set is incredibly comfortable and I am happy that it will find a new home where it'll be appreciated. Let's proceed with that, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #8: Sasha Ramirez said: \"That sounds perfect, Amara. I appreciate your understanding and negotiation. I'm looking forward to adding this furniture to my home. Let's indeed go ahead with $440. Thank you for your time.\"\n\nTurn #9: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm glad we could reach an agreement, Sasha. I'll prepare the furniture for pick-up or delivery. Let me know what works best for you, and I can arrange that. I'm sure this furniture set will be a great addition to your home. Thank you for your understanding and cooperation.\"\n\nTurn #10: Sasha Ramirez said: \"That sounds perfect, Amara. Pick-up works best for me. I will gladly take care of that myself. I'm sure the furniture will look great in my living space. Thanks again.\"\n\nTurn #11: Amara Hartley said: \"That's great, Sasha. You're very welcome! I'm just happy the furniture set is going to a place where it'll be loved. Please feel free to reach out if you have any more questions or need further assistance. Take care!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is selling a couch, loveseat, chair, and ottoman set for $550.0, while another person is keen to purchase it. The set of furniture is described as being incredibly comfortable. The seller's wife wishes to upgrade to a new, stiffer couch, hence the sale. Despite some light staining from life's little incidents, the set is in great condition. The comfort of the furniture is particularly emphasized by the seller.\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Amara Hartley\nSasha Ramirez's background: \nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nSasha Ramirez's goal: Unknown\nAmara Hartley's goal: As the seller for this item, your target price is set at $312.0. Please be aware that a penalty will be incurred if the item is sold for a price significantly below the target price. However, you will receive a bonus if you manage to sell it for more than the target price.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hi Amara! I happened to see your furniture set and it caught my eye. I am looking for a comfortable set just like the one you are selling. I wonder though, how negotiable you are on the price given those little stains you mentioned?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hi Sasha! I'm glad you're interested in the furniture set. We were hoping to get $550 for it, but understanding the concerns about the stains, we can absolutely talk about the price. How about we bring it down to $500 and see if that works for you?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is selling a couch, loveseat, chair, and ottoman set for $550.0, while another person is keen to purchase it. The set of furniture is described as being incredibly comfortable. The seller's wife wishes to upgrade to a new, stiffer couch, hence the sale. Despite some light staining from life's little incidents, the set is in great condition. The comfort of the furniture is particularly emphasized by the seller.\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Amara Hartley\nSasha Ramirez's background: \nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nSasha Ramirez's goal: Unknown\nAmara Hartley's goal: As the seller for this item, your target price is set at $312.0. Please be aware that a penalty will be incurred if the item is sold for a price significantly below the target price. However, you will receive a bonus if you manage to sell it for more than the target price.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hi Amara! I happened to see your furniture set and it caught my eye. I am looking for a comfortable set just like the one you are selling. I wonder though, how negotiable you are on the price given those little stains you mentioned?\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"Hi Sasha! I'm glad you're interested in the furniture set. We were hoping to get $550 for it, but understanding the concerns about the stains, we can absolutely talk about the price. How about we bring it down to $500 and see if that works for you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hi Amara, I appreciate your willingness to negotiate. Given the stains though and the fact that I might have to get them cleaned or even re-upholstered, how about we consider $450 instead? I truly value the comfort that your set can offer, and with that price, I believe it's a good deal for both of us.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I understand where you're coming from, Sasha, and I can appreciate the extra cost you might incur. However, trying to keep the price fair for both of us, how does $475 sound? The set really is very comfortable and despite the stains, is otherwise in great condition.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is selling a couch, loveseat, chair, and ottoman set for $550.0, while another person is keen to purchase it. The set of furniture is described as being incredibly comfortable. The seller's wife wishes to upgrade to a new, stiffer couch, hence the sale. Despite some light staining from life's little incidents, the set is in great condition. The comfort of the furniture is particularly emphasized by the seller.\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Amara Hartley\nSasha Ramirez's background: \nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nSasha Ramirez's goal: Unknown\nAmara Hartley's goal: As the seller for this item, your target price is set at $312.0. Please be aware that a penalty will be incurred if the item is sold for a price significantly below the target price. However, you will receive a bonus if you manage to sell it for more than the target price.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hi Amara! I happened to see your furniture set and it caught my eye. I am looking for a comfortable set just like the one you are selling. I wonder though, how negotiable you are on the price given those little stains you mentioned?\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"Hi Sasha! I'm glad you're interested in the furniture set. We were hoping to get $550 for it, but understanding the concerns about the stains, we can absolutely talk about the price. How about we bring it down to $500 and see if that works for you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hi Amara, I appreciate your willingness to negotiate. Given the stains though and the fact that I might have to get them cleaned or even re-upholstered, how about we consider $450 instead? I truly value the comfort that your set can offer, and with that price, I believe it's a good deal for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #3: Amara Hartley said: \"I understand where you're coming from, Sasha, and I can appreciate the extra cost you might incur. However, trying to keep the price fair for both of us, how does $475 sound? The set really is very comfortable and despite the stains, is otherwise in great condition.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"While we are getting closer, Amara, I've done some calculations and considering the possible extra expense of cleaning or reupholstering, I believe $430 would be a more fair deal for both of us. We both know the set is wonderful and comfortable, and it seems we both want it to find a good home. What do you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Thanks for understanding the situation, Sasha. Please do remember the excellent quality and incredible comfort this furniture set provides. Considering the stains are only light and do not affect the furniture's comfort or durability, let's meet halfway with your last offer. How does $452.50 sound? I think this is a fair deal for both of us. What do you say?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is selling a couch, loveseat, chair, and ottoman set for $550.0, while another person is keen to purchase it. The set of furniture is described as being incredibly comfortable. The seller's wife wishes to upgrade to a new, stiffer couch, hence the sale. Despite some light staining from life's little incidents, the set is in great condition. The comfort of the furniture is particularly emphasized by the seller.\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Amara Hartley\nSasha Ramirez's background: \nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nSasha Ramirez's goal: Unknown\nAmara Hartley's goal: As the seller for this item, your target price is set at $312.0. Please be aware that a penalty will be incurred if the item is sold for a price significantly below the target price. However, you will receive a bonus if you manage to sell it for more than the target price.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hi Amara! I happened to see your furniture set and it caught my eye. I am looking for a comfortable set just like the one you are selling. I wonder though, how negotiable you are on the price given those little stains you mentioned?\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"Hi Sasha! I'm glad you're interested in the furniture set. We were hoping to get $550 for it, but understanding the concerns about the stains, we can absolutely talk about the price. How about we bring it down to $500 and see if that works for you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hi Amara, I appreciate your willingness to negotiate. Given the stains though and the fact that I might have to get them cleaned or even re-upholstered, how about we consider $450 instead? I truly value the comfort that your set can offer, and with that price, I believe it's a good deal for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #3: Amara Hartley said: \"I understand where you're coming from, Sasha, and I can appreciate the extra cost you might incur. However, trying to keep the price fair for both of us, how does $475 sound? The set really is very comfortable and despite the stains, is otherwise in great condition.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"While we are getting closer, Amara, I've done some calculations and considering the possible extra expense of cleaning or reupholstering, I believe $430 would be a more fair deal for both of us. We both know the set is wonderful and comfortable, and it seems we both want it to find a good home. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Amara Hartley said: \"Thanks for understanding the situation, Sasha. Please do remember the excellent quality and incredible comfort this furniture set provides. Considering the stains are only light and do not affect the furniture's comfort or durability, let's meet halfway with your last offer. How does $452.50 sound? I think this is a fair deal for both of us. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #6: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Amara, I truly appreciate your understanding as well. I do see the intrinsic value this furniture set would add to my place. However, keeping in mind the extra cleaning costs and possible reupholstery, I feel we could work at a little more concession. How about we settle on $440? I believe this constitutes a balanced deal for us both.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sasha, thank you for your consideration. I completely understand your concerns. Given the lower price point you've proposed and its proximity to my preferred target, I agree to sell at $440. The set is incredibly comfortable and I am happy that it will find a new home where it'll be appreciated. Let's proceed with that, shall we?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is selling a couch, loveseat, chair, and ottoman set for $550.0, while another person is keen to purchase it. The set of furniture is described as being incredibly comfortable. The seller's wife wishes to upgrade to a new, stiffer couch, hence the sale. Despite some light staining from life's little incidents, the set is in great condition. The comfort of the furniture is particularly emphasized by the seller.\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Amara Hartley\nSasha Ramirez's background: \nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nSasha Ramirez's goal: Unknown\nAmara Hartley's goal: As the seller for this item, your target price is set at $312.0. Please be aware that a penalty will be incurred if the item is sold for a price significantly below the target price. However, you will receive a bonus if you manage to sell it for more than the target price.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hi Amara! I happened to see your furniture set and it caught my eye. I am looking for a comfortable set just like the one you are selling. I wonder though, how negotiable you are on the price given those little stains you mentioned?\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"Hi Sasha! I'm glad you're interested in the furniture set. We were hoping to get $550 for it, but understanding the concerns about the stains, we can absolutely talk about the price. How about we bring it down to $500 and see if that works for you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hi Amara, I appreciate your willingness to negotiate. Given the stains though and the fact that I might have to get them cleaned or even re-upholstered, how about we consider $450 instead? I truly value the comfort that your set can offer, and with that price, I believe it's a good deal for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #3: Amara Hartley said: \"I understand where you're coming from, Sasha, and I can appreciate the extra cost you might incur. However, trying to keep the price fair for both of us, how does $475 sound? The set really is very comfortable and despite the stains, is otherwise in great condition.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"While we are getting closer, Amara, I've done some calculations and considering the possible extra expense of cleaning or reupholstering, I believe $430 would be a more fair deal for both of us. We both know the set is wonderful and comfortable, and it seems we both want it to find a good home. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Amara Hartley said: \"Thanks for understanding the situation, Sasha. Please do remember the excellent quality and incredible comfort this furniture set provides. Considering the stains are only light and do not affect the furniture's comfort or durability, let's meet halfway with your last offer. How does $452.50 sound? I think this is a fair deal for both of us. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #6: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Amara, I truly appreciate your understanding as well. I do see the intrinsic value this furniture set would add to my place. However, keeping in mind the extra cleaning costs and possible reupholstery, I feel we could work at a little more concession. How about we settle on $440? I believe this constitutes a balanced deal for us both.\"\n\nTurn #7: Amara Hartley said: \"Sasha, thank you for your consideration. I completely understand your concerns. Given the lower price point you've proposed and its proximity to my preferred target, I agree to sell at $440. The set is incredibly comfortable and I am happy that it will find a new home where it'll be appreciated. Let's proceed with that, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #8: Sasha Ramirez said: \"That sounds perfect, Amara. I appreciate your understanding and negotiation. I'm looking forward to adding this furniture to my home. Let's indeed go ahead with $440. Thank you for your time.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I'm glad we could reach an agreement, Sasha. I'll prepare the furniture for pick-up or delivery. Let me know what works best for you, and I can arrange that. I'm sure this furniture set will be a great addition to your home. Thank you for your understanding and cooperation.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is selling a couch, loveseat, chair, and ottoman set for $550.0, while another person is keen to purchase it. The set of furniture is described as being incredibly comfortable. The seller's wife wishes to upgrade to a new, stiffer couch, hence the sale. Despite some light staining from life's little incidents, the set is in great condition. The comfort of the furniture is particularly emphasized by the seller.\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Amara Hartley\nSasha Ramirez's background: \nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nSasha Ramirez's goal: Unknown\nAmara Hartley's goal: As the seller for this item, your target price is set at $312.0. Please be aware that a penalty will be incurred if the item is sold for a price significantly below the target price. However, you will receive a bonus if you manage to sell it for more than the target price.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hi Amara! I happened to see your furniture set and it caught my eye. I am looking for a comfortable set just like the one you are selling. I wonder though, how negotiable you are on the price given those little stains you mentioned?\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"Hi Sasha! I'm glad you're interested in the furniture set. We were hoping to get $550 for it, but understanding the concerns about the stains, we can absolutely talk about the price. How about we bring it down to $500 and see if that works for you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hi Amara, I appreciate your willingness to negotiate. Given the stains though and the fact that I might have to get them cleaned or even re-upholstered, how about we consider $450 instead? I truly value the comfort that your set can offer, and with that price, I believe it's a good deal for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #3: Amara Hartley said: \"I understand where you're coming from, Sasha, and I can appreciate the extra cost you might incur. However, trying to keep the price fair for both of us, how does $475 sound? The set really is very comfortable and despite the stains, is otherwise in great condition.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"While we are getting closer, Amara, I've done some calculations and considering the possible extra expense of cleaning or reupholstering, I believe $430 would be a more fair deal for both of us. We both know the set is wonderful and comfortable, and it seems we both want it to find a good home. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Amara Hartley said: \"Thanks for understanding the situation, Sasha. Please do remember the excellent quality and incredible comfort this furniture set provides. Considering the stains are only light and do not affect the furniture's comfort or durability, let's meet halfway with your last offer. How does $452.50 sound? I think this is a fair deal for both of us. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #6: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Amara, I truly appreciate your understanding as well. I do see the intrinsic value this furniture set would add to my place. However, keeping in mind the extra cleaning costs and possible reupholstery, I feel we could work at a little more concession. How about we settle on $440? I believe this constitutes a balanced deal for us both.\"\n\nTurn #7: Amara Hartley said: \"Sasha, thank you for your consideration. I completely understand your concerns. Given the lower price point you've proposed and its proximity to my preferred target, I agree to sell at $440. The set is incredibly comfortable and I am happy that it will find a new home where it'll be appreciated. Let's proceed with that, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #8: Sasha Ramirez said: \"That sounds perfect, Amara. I appreciate your understanding and negotiation. I'm looking forward to adding this furniture to my home. Let's indeed go ahead with $440. Thank you for your time.\"\n\nTurn #9: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm glad we could reach an agreement, Sasha. I'll prepare the furniture for pick-up or delivery. Let me know what works best for you, and I can arrange that. I'm sure this furniture set will be a great addition to your home. Thank you for your understanding and cooperation.\"\n\nTurn #10: Sasha Ramirez said: \"That sounds perfect, Amara. Pick-up works best for me. I will gladly take care of that myself. I'm sure the furniture will look great in my living space. Thanks again.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's great, Sasha. You're very welcome! I'm just happy the furniture set is going to a place where it'll be loved. Please feel free to reach out if you have any more questions or need further assistance. Take care!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Amara Hartley, your task is to act/speak as Amara Hartley would, keeping in mind Amara Hartley's social goal.\nYou can find Amara Hartley's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Amara Hartley's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Amara Hartley's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is selling a couch, loveseat, chair, and ottoman set for $550.0, while another person is keen to purchase it. The set of furniture is described as being incredibly comfortable. The seller's wife wishes to upgrade to a new, stiffer couch, hence the sale. Despite some light staining from life's little incidents, the set is in great condition. The comfort of the furniture is particularly emphasized by the seller.\nParticipants: Sasha Ramirez and Amara Hartley\nSasha Ramirez's background: \nAmara Hartley's background: Amara Hartley is a 29-year-old female wildlife biologist. She/her pronouns. Amara Hartley spends her free time helping endangered animals and is a nature enthusiast. Her passion for animals and the environment is notable. Personality and values description: Amara Hartley is open-minded, ambiverted, and can be emotionally volatile. A believer in universalism and benevolence, Amara is analytical and intuitive in her decision-making. Amara's secrets: Secretly involved in animal-rights extremism\nSasha Ramirez's goal: Unknown\nAmara Hartley's goal: As the seller for this item, your target price is set at $312.0. Please be aware that a penalty will be incurred if the item is sold for a price significantly below the target price. However, you will receive a bonus if you manage to sell it for more than the target price.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hi Amara! I happened to see your furniture set and it caught my eye. I am looking for a comfortable set just like the one you are selling. I wonder though, how negotiable you are on the price given those little stains you mentioned?\"\n\nTurn #1: Amara Hartley said: \"Hi Sasha! I'm glad you're interested in the furniture set. We were hoping to get $550 for it, but understanding the concerns about the stains, we can absolutely talk about the price. How about we bring it down to $500 and see if that works for you?\"\n\nTurn #2: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Hi Amara, I appreciate your willingness to negotiate. Given the stains though and the fact that I might have to get them cleaned or even re-upholstered, how about we consider $450 instead? I truly value the comfort that your set can offer, and with that price, I believe it's a good deal for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #3: Amara Hartley said: \"I understand where you're coming from, Sasha, and I can appreciate the extra cost you might incur. However, trying to keep the price fair for both of us, how does $475 sound? The set really is very comfortable and despite the stains, is otherwise in great condition.\"\n\nTurn #4: Sasha Ramirez said: \"While we are getting closer, Amara, I've done some calculations and considering the possible extra expense of cleaning or reupholstering, I believe $430 would be a more fair deal for both of us. We both know the set is wonderful and comfortable, and it seems we both want it to find a good home. What do you think?\"\n\nTurn #5: Amara Hartley said: \"Thanks for understanding the situation, Sasha. Please do remember the excellent quality and incredible comfort this furniture set provides. Considering the stains are only light and do not affect the furniture's comfort or durability, let's meet halfway with your last offer. How does $452.50 sound? I think this is a fair deal for both of us. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #6: Sasha Ramirez said: \"Amara, I truly appreciate your understanding as well. I do see the intrinsic value this furniture set would add to my place. However, keeping in mind the extra cleaning costs and possible reupholstery, I feel we could work at a little more concession. How about we settle on $440? I believe this constitutes a balanced deal for us both.\"\n\nTurn #7: Amara Hartley said: \"Sasha, thank you for your consideration. I completely understand your concerns. Given the lower price point you've proposed and its proximity to my preferred target, I agree to sell at $440. The set is incredibly comfortable and I am happy that it will find a new home where it'll be appreciated. Let's proceed with that, shall we?\"\n\nTurn #8: Sasha Ramirez said: \"That sounds perfect, Amara. I appreciate your understanding and negotiation. I'm looking forward to adding this furniture to my home. Let's indeed go ahead with $440. Thank you for your time.\"\n\nTurn #9: Amara Hartley said: \"I'm glad we could reach an agreement, Sasha. I'll prepare the furniture for pick-up or delivery. Let me know what works best for you, and I can arrange that. I'm sure this furniture set will be a great addition to your home. Thank you for your understanding and cooperation.\"\n\nTurn #10: Sasha Ramirez said: \"That sounds perfect, Amara. Pick-up works best for me. I will gladly take care of that myself. I'm sure the furniture will look great in my living space. Thanks again.\"\n\nTurn #11: Amara Hartley said: \"That's great, Sasha. You're very welcome! I'm just happy the furniture set is going to a place where it'll be loved. Please feel free to reach out if you have any more questions or need further assistance. Take care!\"\n\nTurn #12: Sasha Ramirez left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Rafael Cortez, your task is to act/speak as Rafael Cortez would, keeping in mind Rafael Cortez's social goal.\nYou can find Rafael Cortez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Rafael Cortez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Rafael Cortez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. Personality and values description: Rafael Cortez, with his outgoing nature and competitive spirit, believes in self-direction. He employs a systematic approach to his decisions. Rafael's secrets: He cheated on his medical school exams.\nOliver Thompson's background: \nRafael Cortez's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDavid: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Christian Moerlein Brewing Company Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nLarry: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nLynn: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Cray Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nDonald: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Advance Auto Parts Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nDennis: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nJane: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Planet Hollywood Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nHarvey: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: Sony Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nNinfa: Hobby: Quilting Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nAngelica: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Planet Hollywood Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \n\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Good evening, Oliver. Great party, isn't it? It's always interesting to meet new people. Meanwhile, you can never know how many common acquaintances you might discover. Don't you agree? I mean, for instance, do you have any friends who are into homebrewing? It seems to be a favored hobby among some of my friends.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Rafael Cortez, your task is to act/speak as Rafael Cortez would, keeping in mind Rafael Cortez's social goal.\nYou can find Rafael Cortez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Rafael Cortez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Rafael Cortez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. Personality and values description: Rafael Cortez, with his outgoing nature and competitive spirit, believes in self-direction. He employs a systematic approach to his decisions. Rafael's secrets: He cheated on his medical school exams.\nOliver Thompson's background: \nRafael Cortez's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDavid: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Christian Moerlein Brewing Company Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nLarry: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nLynn: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Cray Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nDonald: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Advance Auto Parts Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nDennis: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nJane: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Planet Hollywood Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nHarvey: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: Sony Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nNinfa: Hobby: Quilting Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nAngelica: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Planet Hollywood Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \n\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening, Oliver. Great party, isn't it? It's always interesting to meet new people. Meanwhile, you can never know how many common acquaintances you might discover. Don't you agree? I mean, for instance, do you have any friends who are into homebrewing? It seems to be a favored hobby among some of my friends.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"I completely agree, Rafael. It's fascinating how many shared connections can exist unknowingly. Speaking of hobbies, one of my good friends Harvey has been quite into amateur radio. It always astonishes me how he dedicates his afternoon tinkering with those radio bits. Do you happen to know any amateur radio enthusiasts, Rafael?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ah, amateur radio, that's quite a specific hobby. I do know of one, a friend of mine, Dennis. He's always up early in the morning, fiddling with his radio devices, I think he even works at the J.M. Smucker Company. You wouldn't happen to know anyone from there, would you?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Rafael Cortez, your task is to act/speak as Rafael Cortez would, keeping in mind Rafael Cortez's social goal.\nYou can find Rafael Cortez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Rafael Cortez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Rafael Cortez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. Personality and values description: Rafael Cortez, with his outgoing nature and competitive spirit, believes in self-direction. He employs a systematic approach to his decisions. Rafael's secrets: He cheated on his medical school exams.\nOliver Thompson's background: \nRafael Cortez's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDavid: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Christian Moerlein Brewing Company Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nLarry: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nLynn: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Cray Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nDonald: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Advance Auto Parts Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nDennis: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nJane: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Planet Hollywood Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nHarvey: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: Sony Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nNinfa: Hobby: Quilting Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nAngelica: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Planet Hollywood Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \n\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening, Oliver. Great party, isn't it? It's always interesting to meet new people. Meanwhile, you can never know how many common acquaintances you might discover. Don't you agree? I mean, for instance, do you have any friends who are into homebrewing? It seems to be a favored hobby among some of my friends.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"I completely agree, Rafael. It's fascinating how many shared connections can exist unknowingly. Speaking of hobbies, one of my good friends Harvey has been quite into amateur radio. It always astonishes me how he dedicates his afternoon tinkering with those radio bits. Do you happen to know any amateur radio enthusiasts, Rafael?\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Ah, amateur radio, that's quite a specific hobby. I do know of one, a friend of mine, Dennis. He's always up early in the morning, fiddling with his radio devices, I think he even works at the J.M. Smucker Company. You wouldn't happen to know anyone from there, would you?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"Interesting, Rafael! One acquaintance of mine, Blake, is keen on dancing and he also works at The J.M. Smucker Company. He is more of an evening person, though, often dancing under the stars. Does the name Blake ring a bell to you?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"The name Blake doesn't seem to be familiar to me. But it's intriguing how the circles overlap, especially around The J.M. Smucker Company. Since we're talking about dancing, do you know anyone who spends their evenings outdoors, maybe even under the stars, working on a hobby like homebrewing or quilting? I know a couple of people like that.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Rafael Cortez, your task is to act/speak as Rafael Cortez would, keeping in mind Rafael Cortez's social goal.\nYou can find Rafael Cortez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Rafael Cortez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Rafael Cortez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. Personality and values description: Rafael Cortez, with his outgoing nature and competitive spirit, believes in self-direction. He employs a systematic approach to his decisions. Rafael's secrets: He cheated on his medical school exams.\nOliver Thompson's background: \nRafael Cortez's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDavid: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Christian Moerlein Brewing Company Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nLarry: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nLynn: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Cray Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nDonald: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Advance Auto Parts Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nDennis: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nJane: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Planet Hollywood Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nHarvey: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: Sony Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nNinfa: Hobby: Quilting Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nAngelica: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Planet Hollywood Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \n\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening, Oliver. Great party, isn't it? It's always interesting to meet new people. Meanwhile, you can never know how many common acquaintances you might discover. Don't you agree? I mean, for instance, do you have any friends who are into homebrewing? It seems to be a favored hobby among some of my friends.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"I completely agree, Rafael. It's fascinating how many shared connections can exist unknowingly. Speaking of hobbies, one of my good friends Harvey has been quite into amateur radio. It always astonishes me how he dedicates his afternoon tinkering with those radio bits. Do you happen to know any amateur radio enthusiasts, Rafael?\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Ah, amateur radio, that's quite a specific hobby. I do know of one, a friend of mine, Dennis. He's always up early in the morning, fiddling with his radio devices, I think he even works at the J.M. Smucker Company. You wouldn't happen to know anyone from there, would you?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"Interesting, Rafael! One acquaintance of mine, Blake, is keen on dancing and he also works at The J.M. Smucker Company. He is more of an evening person, though, often dancing under the stars. Does the name Blake ring a bell to you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Rafael Cortez said: \"The name Blake doesn't seem to be familiar to me. But it's intriguing how the circles overlap, especially around The J.M. Smucker Company. Since we're talking about dancing, do you know anyone who spends their evenings outdoors, maybe even under the stars, working on a hobby like homebrewing or quilting? I know a couple of people like that.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, the overlap in our circles is intriguing, Rafael. Speaking of hobbies that involve evenings spent outdoors, I do know of a few. For instance, there's my friend Lawrence who is quite the kayaking enthusiast, he prefers the evenings for his adrenaline rushes in the water. Or Dallas, another friend of mine, who loves dancing the night away under the stars. Did either of those sound familiar to you?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Neither Lawrence nor Dallas rings a bell, Oliver. Since we've mentioned it a couple of times already, I can't help but wonder if we share any friends from The J.M. Smucker Company. Do you know anyone from there who spends their mornings outdoors, perhaps with a hobby such as homebrewing or quilting?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Rafael Cortez, your task is to act/speak as Rafael Cortez would, keeping in mind Rafael Cortez's social goal.\nYou can find Rafael Cortez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Rafael Cortez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Rafael Cortez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. Personality and values description: Rafael Cortez, with his outgoing nature and competitive spirit, believes in self-direction. He employs a systematic approach to his decisions. Rafael's secrets: He cheated on his medical school exams.\nOliver Thompson's background: \nRafael Cortez's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDavid: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Christian Moerlein Brewing Company Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nLarry: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nLynn: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Cray Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nDonald: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Advance Auto Parts Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nDennis: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nJane: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Planet Hollywood Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nHarvey: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: Sony Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nNinfa: Hobby: Quilting Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nAngelica: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Planet Hollywood Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \n\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening, Oliver. Great party, isn't it? It's always interesting to meet new people. Meanwhile, you can never know how many common acquaintances you might discover. Don't you agree? I mean, for instance, do you have any friends who are into homebrewing? It seems to be a favored hobby among some of my friends.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"I completely agree, Rafael. It's fascinating how many shared connections can exist unknowingly. Speaking of hobbies, one of my good friends Harvey has been quite into amateur radio. It always astonishes me how he dedicates his afternoon tinkering with those radio bits. Do you happen to know any amateur radio enthusiasts, Rafael?\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Ah, amateur radio, that's quite a specific hobby. I do know of one, a friend of mine, Dennis. He's always up early in the morning, fiddling with his radio devices, I think he even works at the J.M. Smucker Company. You wouldn't happen to know anyone from there, would you?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"Interesting, Rafael! One acquaintance of mine, Blake, is keen on dancing and he also works at The J.M. Smucker Company. He is more of an evening person, though, often dancing under the stars. Does the name Blake ring a bell to you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Rafael Cortez said: \"The name Blake doesn't seem to be familiar to me. But it's intriguing how the circles overlap, especially around The J.M. Smucker Company. Since we're talking about dancing, do you know anyone who spends their evenings outdoors, maybe even under the stars, working on a hobby like homebrewing or quilting? I know a couple of people like that.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, the overlap in our circles is intriguing, Rafael. Speaking of hobbies that involve evenings spent outdoors, I do know of a few. For instance, there's my friend Lawrence who is quite the kayaking enthusiast, he prefers the evenings for his adrenaline rushes in the water. Or Dallas, another friend of mine, who loves dancing the night away under the stars. Did either of those sound familiar to you?\"\n\nTurn #6: Rafael Cortez said: \"Neither Lawrence nor Dallas rings a bell, Oliver. Since we've mentioned it a couple of times already, I can't help but wonder if we share any friends from The J.M. Smucker Company. Do you know anyone from there who spends their mornings outdoors, perhaps with a hobby such as homebrewing or quilting?\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"The only friend I have from The J.M. Smucker Company who has an outdoor hobby is Blake, whom we've already discussed. However, his hobby is dancing, not homebrewing or quilting. And he's not much of a morning person either, tends to enjoy his evenings more. It seems our circles overlap but maybe not as much as we initially thought, Rafael.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Rafael Cortez, your task is to act/speak as Rafael Cortez would, keeping in mind Rafael Cortez's social goal.\nYou can find Rafael Cortez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Rafael Cortez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Rafael Cortez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. Personality and values description: Rafael Cortez, with his outgoing nature and competitive spirit, believes in self-direction. He employs a systematic approach to his decisions. Rafael's secrets: He cheated on his medical school exams.\nOliver Thompson's background: \nRafael Cortez's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDavid: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Christian Moerlein Brewing Company Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nLarry: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nLynn: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Cray Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nDonald: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Advance Auto Parts Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nDennis: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nJane: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Planet Hollywood Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nHarvey: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: Sony Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nNinfa: Hobby: Quilting Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nAngelica: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Planet Hollywood Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \n\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening, Oliver. Great party, isn't it? It's always interesting to meet new people. Meanwhile, you can never know how many common acquaintances you might discover. Don't you agree? I mean, for instance, do you have any friends who are into homebrewing? It seems to be a favored hobby among some of my friends.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"I completely agree, Rafael. It's fascinating how many shared connections can exist unknowingly. Speaking of hobbies, one of my good friends Harvey has been quite into amateur radio. It always astonishes me how he dedicates his afternoon tinkering with those radio bits. Do you happen to know any amateur radio enthusiasts, Rafael?\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Ah, amateur radio, that's quite a specific hobby. I do know of one, a friend of mine, Dennis. He's always up early in the morning, fiddling with his radio devices, I think he even works at the J.M. Smucker Company. You wouldn't happen to know anyone from there, would you?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"Interesting, Rafael! One acquaintance of mine, Blake, is keen on dancing and he also works at The J.M. Smucker Company. He is more of an evening person, though, often dancing under the stars. Does the name Blake ring a bell to you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Rafael Cortez said: \"The name Blake doesn't seem to be familiar to me. But it's intriguing how the circles overlap, especially around The J.M. Smucker Company. Since we're talking about dancing, do you know anyone who spends their evenings outdoors, maybe even under the stars, working on a hobby like homebrewing or quilting? I know a couple of people like that.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, the overlap in our circles is intriguing, Rafael. Speaking of hobbies that involve evenings spent outdoors, I do know of a few. For instance, there's my friend Lawrence who is quite the kayaking enthusiast, he prefers the evenings for his adrenaline rushes in the water. Or Dallas, another friend of mine, who loves dancing the night away under the stars. Did either of those sound familiar to you?\"\n\nTurn #6: Rafael Cortez said: \"Neither Lawrence nor Dallas rings a bell, Oliver. Since we've mentioned it a couple of times already, I can't help but wonder if we share any friends from The J.M. Smucker Company. Do you know anyone from there who spends their mornings outdoors, perhaps with a hobby such as homebrewing or quilting?\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"The only friend I have from The J.M. Smucker Company who has an outdoor hobby is Blake, whom we've already discussed. However, his hobby is dancing, not homebrewing or quilting. And he's not much of a morning person either, tends to enjoy his evenings more. It seems our circles overlap but maybe not as much as we initially thought, Rafael.\"\n\nTurn #8: \n\nTurn #9: Oliver Thompson said: \"Well, it's not uncommon for different circles to intersect at a few points, Rafael. Speaking of The J.M. Smucker Company again, do you happen to know anyone there who's into dancing? Particularly someone who likes to dance outdoors in the evenings.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Not exactly, but it's interesting how The J.M. Smucker Company keeps surfacing. However, regarding dancing outdoors in the evenings, it reminds me of my friend Angelica who loves homebrewing outdoors right around dusk. She's with Planet Hollywood, though. A different overlap, I guess. Oliver, do you happen to know anyone from Planet Hollywood?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Rafael Cortez, your task is to act/speak as Rafael Cortez would, keeping in mind Rafael Cortez's social goal.\nYou can find Rafael Cortez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Rafael Cortez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Rafael Cortez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. Personality and values description: Rafael Cortez, with his outgoing nature and competitive spirit, believes in self-direction. He employs a systematic approach to his decisions. Rafael's secrets: He cheated on his medical school exams.\nOliver Thompson's background: \nRafael Cortez's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDavid: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Christian Moerlein Brewing Company Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nLarry: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nLynn: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Cray Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nDonald: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Advance Auto Parts Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nDennis: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nJane: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Planet Hollywood Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nHarvey: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: Sony Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nNinfa: Hobby: Quilting Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nAngelica: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Planet Hollywood Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \n\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening, Oliver. Great party, isn't it? It's always interesting to meet new people. Meanwhile, you can never know how many common acquaintances you might discover. Don't you agree? I mean, for instance, do you have any friends who are into homebrewing? It seems to be a favored hobby among some of my friends.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"I completely agree, Rafael. It's fascinating how many shared connections can exist unknowingly. Speaking of hobbies, one of my good friends Harvey has been quite into amateur radio. It always astonishes me how he dedicates his afternoon tinkering with those radio bits. Do you happen to know any amateur radio enthusiasts, Rafael?\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Ah, amateur radio, that's quite a specific hobby. I do know of one, a friend of mine, Dennis. He's always up early in the morning, fiddling with his radio devices, I think he even works at the J.M. Smucker Company. You wouldn't happen to know anyone from there, would you?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"Interesting, Rafael! One acquaintance of mine, Blake, is keen on dancing and he also works at The J.M. Smucker Company. He is more of an evening person, though, often dancing under the stars. Does the name Blake ring a bell to you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Rafael Cortez said: \"The name Blake doesn't seem to be familiar to me. But it's intriguing how the circles overlap, especially around The J.M. Smucker Company. Since we're talking about dancing, do you know anyone who spends their evenings outdoors, maybe even under the stars, working on a hobby like homebrewing or quilting? I know a couple of people like that.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, the overlap in our circles is intriguing, Rafael. Speaking of hobbies that involve evenings spent outdoors, I do know of a few. For instance, there's my friend Lawrence who is quite the kayaking enthusiast, he prefers the evenings for his adrenaline rushes in the water. Or Dallas, another friend of mine, who loves dancing the night away under the stars. Did either of those sound familiar to you?\"\n\nTurn #6: Rafael Cortez said: \"Neither Lawrence nor Dallas rings a bell, Oliver. Since we've mentioned it a couple of times already, I can't help but wonder if we share any friends from The J.M. Smucker Company. Do you know anyone from there who spends their mornings outdoors, perhaps with a hobby such as homebrewing or quilting?\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"The only friend I have from The J.M. Smucker Company who has an outdoor hobby is Blake, whom we've already discussed. However, his hobby is dancing, not homebrewing or quilting. And he's not much of a morning person either, tends to enjoy his evenings more. It seems our circles overlap but maybe not as much as we initially thought, Rafael.\"\n\nTurn #8: \n\nTurn #9: Oliver Thompson said: \"Well, it's not uncommon for different circles to intersect at a few points, Rafael. Speaking of The J.M. Smucker Company again, do you happen to know anyone there who's into dancing? Particularly someone who likes to dance outdoors in the evenings.\"\n\nTurn #10: Rafael Cortez said: \"Not exactly, but it's interesting how The J.M. Smucker Company keeps surfacing. However, regarding dancing outdoors in the evenings, it reminds me of my friend Angelica who loves homebrewing outdoors right around dusk. She's with Planet Hollywood, though. A different overlap, I guess. Oliver, do you happen to know anyone from Planet Hollywood?\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Thompson said: \"Unfortunately, Rafael, I don't recall knowing anyone from Planet Hollywood. For the most part, my friends and acquaintances are spread across a few select companies. Perhaps our circles don't overlap as much as we thought, but it's always fascinating discovering these links, isn't it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, Oliver, it's fascinating. These seemingly unrelated links do create an interesting tapestry. On a side note, I recall a friend of mine, Lynn, who works at Cray. She loves homebrewing and tends to do it outdoors in the evening. Maybe, we might not have as many common friends as we first thought, yet it's been intriguing to see the overlaps and near connections, don't you agree?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Rafael Cortez, your task is to act/speak as Rafael Cortez would, keeping in mind Rafael Cortez's social goal.\nYou can find Rafael Cortez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Rafael Cortez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Rafael Cortez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. Personality and values description: Rafael Cortez, with his outgoing nature and competitive spirit, believes in self-direction. He employs a systematic approach to his decisions. Rafael's secrets: He cheated on his medical school exams.\nOliver Thompson's background: \nRafael Cortez's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDavid: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Christian Moerlein Brewing Company Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nLarry: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nLynn: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Cray Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nDonald: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Advance Auto Parts Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nDennis: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nJane: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Planet Hollywood Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nHarvey: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: Sony Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nNinfa: Hobby: Quilting Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nAngelica: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Planet Hollywood Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \n\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening, Oliver. Great party, isn't it? It's always interesting to meet new people. Meanwhile, you can never know how many common acquaintances you might discover. Don't you agree? I mean, for instance, do you have any friends who are into homebrewing? It seems to be a favored hobby among some of my friends.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"I completely agree, Rafael. It's fascinating how many shared connections can exist unknowingly. Speaking of hobbies, one of my good friends Harvey has been quite into amateur radio. It always astonishes me how he dedicates his afternoon tinkering with those radio bits. Do you happen to know any amateur radio enthusiasts, Rafael?\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Ah, amateur radio, that's quite a specific hobby. I do know of one, a friend of mine, Dennis. He's always up early in the morning, fiddling with his radio devices, I think he even works at the J.M. Smucker Company. You wouldn't happen to know anyone from there, would you?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"Interesting, Rafael! One acquaintance of mine, Blake, is keen on dancing and he also works at The J.M. Smucker Company. He is more of an evening person, though, often dancing under the stars. Does the name Blake ring a bell to you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Rafael Cortez said: \"The name Blake doesn't seem to be familiar to me. But it's intriguing how the circles overlap, especially around The J.M. Smucker Company. Since we're talking about dancing, do you know anyone who spends their evenings outdoors, maybe even under the stars, working on a hobby like homebrewing or quilting? I know a couple of people like that.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, the overlap in our circles is intriguing, Rafael. Speaking of hobbies that involve evenings spent outdoors, I do know of a few. For instance, there's my friend Lawrence who is quite the kayaking enthusiast, he prefers the evenings for his adrenaline rushes in the water. Or Dallas, another friend of mine, who loves dancing the night away under the stars. Did either of those sound familiar to you?\"\n\nTurn #6: Rafael Cortez said: \"Neither Lawrence nor Dallas rings a bell, Oliver. Since we've mentioned it a couple of times already, I can't help but wonder if we share any friends from The J.M. Smucker Company. Do you know anyone from there who spends their mornings outdoors, perhaps with a hobby such as homebrewing or quilting?\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"The only friend I have from The J.M. Smucker Company who has an outdoor hobby is Blake, whom we've already discussed. However, his hobby is dancing, not homebrewing or quilting. And he's not much of a morning person either, tends to enjoy his evenings more. It seems our circles overlap but maybe not as much as we initially thought, Rafael.\"\n\nTurn #8: \n\nTurn #9: Oliver Thompson said: \"Well, it's not uncommon for different circles to intersect at a few points, Rafael. Speaking of The J.M. Smucker Company again, do you happen to know anyone there who's into dancing? Particularly someone who likes to dance outdoors in the evenings.\"\n\nTurn #10: Rafael Cortez said: \"Not exactly, but it's interesting how The J.M. Smucker Company keeps surfacing. However, regarding dancing outdoors in the evenings, it reminds me of my friend Angelica who loves homebrewing outdoors right around dusk. She's with Planet Hollywood, though. A different overlap, I guess. Oliver, do you happen to know anyone from Planet Hollywood?\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Thompson said: \"Unfortunately, Rafael, I don't recall knowing anyone from Planet Hollywood. For the most part, my friends and acquaintances are spread across a few select companies. Perhaps our circles don't overlap as much as we thought, but it's always fascinating discovering these links, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #12: Rafael Cortez said: \"Indeed, Oliver, it's fascinating. These seemingly unrelated links do create an interesting tapestry. On a side note, I recall a friend of mine, Lynn, who works at Cray. She loves homebrewing and tends to do it outdoors in the evening. Maybe, we might not have as many common friends as we first thought, yet it's been intriguing to see the overlaps and near connections, don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #13: Oliver Thompson said: \"Certainly, Rafael, it's truly been fascinating to trace these threads, even if they didn't quite lead to a shared acquaintance. You mentioned Cray, and as it happens, a friend of mine, Louise, works there. She's quite a dancer and prefers spending her free time in the evening, ideally outdoors. But homebrewing? Can't say I've heard her talk about it. It seems we might have interesting overlaps, but not identical connections. I've enjoyed this nonetheless!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Yes, I agree, Oliver. Our separate circles do seem to possess unique constellations of interesting characters, and it's always fascinating to try and find those points of overlap. Even if we didn't find a mutual friend, at least we've had an intriguing conversation. I've quite enjoyed this.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Rafael Cortez, your task is to act/speak as Rafael Cortez would, keeping in mind Rafael Cortez's social goal.\nYou can find Rafael Cortez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Rafael Cortez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Rafael Cortez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. Personality and values description: Rafael Cortez, with his outgoing nature and competitive spirit, believes in self-direction. He employs a systematic approach to his decisions. Rafael's secrets: He cheated on his medical school exams.\nOliver Thompson's background: \nRafael Cortez's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDavid: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Christian Moerlein Brewing Company Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nLarry: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nLynn: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Cray Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nDonald: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Advance Auto Parts Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nDennis: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nJane: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Planet Hollywood Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nHarvey: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: Sony Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nNinfa: Hobby: Quilting Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nAngelica: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Planet Hollywood Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \n\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening, Oliver. Great party, isn't it? It's always interesting to meet new people. Meanwhile, you can never know how many common acquaintances you might discover. Don't you agree? I mean, for instance, do you have any friends who are into homebrewing? It seems to be a favored hobby among some of my friends.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"I completely agree, Rafael. It's fascinating how many shared connections can exist unknowingly. Speaking of hobbies, one of my good friends Harvey has been quite into amateur radio. It always astonishes me how he dedicates his afternoon tinkering with those radio bits. Do you happen to know any amateur radio enthusiasts, Rafael?\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Ah, amateur radio, that's quite a specific hobby. I do know of one, a friend of mine, Dennis. He's always up early in the morning, fiddling with his radio devices, I think he even works at the J.M. Smucker Company. You wouldn't happen to know anyone from there, would you?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"Interesting, Rafael! One acquaintance of mine, Blake, is keen on dancing and he also works at The J.M. Smucker Company. He is more of an evening person, though, often dancing under the stars. Does the name Blake ring a bell to you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Rafael Cortez said: \"The name Blake doesn't seem to be familiar to me. But it's intriguing how the circles overlap, especially around The J.M. Smucker Company. Since we're talking about dancing, do you know anyone who spends their evenings outdoors, maybe even under the stars, working on a hobby like homebrewing or quilting? I know a couple of people like that.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, the overlap in our circles is intriguing, Rafael. Speaking of hobbies that involve evenings spent outdoors, I do know of a few. For instance, there's my friend Lawrence who is quite the kayaking enthusiast, he prefers the evenings for his adrenaline rushes in the water. Or Dallas, another friend of mine, who loves dancing the night away under the stars. Did either of those sound familiar to you?\"\n\nTurn #6: Rafael Cortez said: \"Neither Lawrence nor Dallas rings a bell, Oliver. Since we've mentioned it a couple of times already, I can't help but wonder if we share any friends from The J.M. Smucker Company. Do you know anyone from there who spends their mornings outdoors, perhaps with a hobby such as homebrewing or quilting?\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"The only friend I have from The J.M. Smucker Company who has an outdoor hobby is Blake, whom we've already discussed. However, his hobby is dancing, not homebrewing or quilting. And he's not much of a morning person either, tends to enjoy his evenings more. It seems our circles overlap but maybe not as much as we initially thought, Rafael.\"\n\nTurn #8: \n\nTurn #9: Oliver Thompson said: \"Well, it's not uncommon for different circles to intersect at a few points, Rafael. Speaking of The J.M. Smucker Company again, do you happen to know anyone there who's into dancing? Particularly someone who likes to dance outdoors in the evenings.\"\n\nTurn #10: Rafael Cortez said: \"Not exactly, but it's interesting how The J.M. Smucker Company keeps surfacing. However, regarding dancing outdoors in the evenings, it reminds me of my friend Angelica who loves homebrewing outdoors right around dusk. She's with Planet Hollywood, though. A different overlap, I guess. Oliver, do you happen to know anyone from Planet Hollywood?\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Thompson said: \"Unfortunately, Rafael, I don't recall knowing anyone from Planet Hollywood. For the most part, my friends and acquaintances are spread across a few select companies. Perhaps our circles don't overlap as much as we thought, but it's always fascinating discovering these links, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #12: Rafael Cortez said: \"Indeed, Oliver, it's fascinating. These seemingly unrelated links do create an interesting tapestry. On a side note, I recall a friend of mine, Lynn, who works at Cray. She loves homebrewing and tends to do it outdoors in the evening. Maybe, we might not have as many common friends as we first thought, yet it's been intriguing to see the overlaps and near connections, don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #13: Oliver Thompson said: \"Certainly, Rafael, it's truly been fascinating to trace these threads, even if they didn't quite lead to a shared acquaintance. You mentioned Cray, and as it happens, a friend of mine, Louise, works there. She's quite a dancer and prefers spending her free time in the evening, ideally outdoors. But homebrewing? Can't say I've heard her talk about it. It seems we might have interesting overlaps, but not identical connections. I've enjoyed this nonetheless!\"\n\nTurn #14: Rafael Cortez said: \"Yes, I agree, Oliver. Our separate circles do seem to possess unique constellations of interesting characters, and it's always fascinating to try and find those points of overlap. Even if we didn't find a mutual friend, at least we've had an intriguing conversation. I've quite enjoyed this.\"\n\nTurn #15: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, Rafael, the conversation itself has been quite enjoyable. It's been delightful learning about your circle of friends and finding the points of convergence with mine. It's a small world after all, isn't it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I certainly agree, Oliver. Despite not finding a mutual friend, the conversation has been a fascinating exploration of our social connections. It's always interesting to find where our paths cross in this small world.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Rafael Cortez, your task is to act/speak as Rafael Cortez would, keeping in mind Rafael Cortez's social goal.\nYou can find Rafael Cortez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Rafael Cortez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Rafael Cortez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. Personality and values description: Rafael Cortez, with his outgoing nature and competitive spirit, believes in self-direction. He employs a systematic approach to his decisions. Rafael's secrets: He cheated on his medical school exams.\nOliver Thompson's background: \nRafael Cortez's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nDavid: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Christian Moerlein Brewing Company Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nLarry: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nLynn: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Cray Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nDonald: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Advance Auto Parts Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nDennis: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nJane: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Planet Hollywood Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nHarvey: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: Sony Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nNinfa: Hobby: Quilting Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: morning Location Preference: outdoor \nAngelica: Hobby: Homebrewing Company: Planet Hollywood Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \n\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening, Oliver. Great party, isn't it? It's always interesting to meet new people. Meanwhile, you can never know how many common acquaintances you might discover. Don't you agree? I mean, for instance, do you have any friends who are into homebrewing? It seems to be a favored hobby among some of my friends.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"I completely agree, Rafael. It's fascinating how many shared connections can exist unknowingly. Speaking of hobbies, one of my good friends Harvey has been quite into amateur radio. It always astonishes me how he dedicates his afternoon tinkering with those radio bits. Do you happen to know any amateur radio enthusiasts, Rafael?\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Ah, amateur radio, that's quite a specific hobby. I do know of one, a friend of mine, Dennis. He's always up early in the morning, fiddling with his radio devices, I think he even works at the J.M. Smucker Company. You wouldn't happen to know anyone from there, would you?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"Interesting, Rafael! One acquaintance of mine, Blake, is keen on dancing and he also works at The J.M. Smucker Company. He is more of an evening person, though, often dancing under the stars. Does the name Blake ring a bell to you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Rafael Cortez said: \"The name Blake doesn't seem to be familiar to me. But it's intriguing how the circles overlap, especially around The J.M. Smucker Company. Since we're talking about dancing, do you know anyone who spends their evenings outdoors, maybe even under the stars, working on a hobby like homebrewing or quilting? I know a couple of people like that.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, the overlap in our circles is intriguing, Rafael. Speaking of hobbies that involve evenings spent outdoors, I do know of a few. For instance, there's my friend Lawrence who is quite the kayaking enthusiast, he prefers the evenings for his adrenaline rushes in the water. Or Dallas, another friend of mine, who loves dancing the night away under the stars. Did either of those sound familiar to you?\"\n\nTurn #6: Rafael Cortez said: \"Neither Lawrence nor Dallas rings a bell, Oliver. Since we've mentioned it a couple of times already, I can't help but wonder if we share any friends from The J.M. Smucker Company. Do you know anyone from there who spends their mornings outdoors, perhaps with a hobby such as homebrewing or quilting?\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"The only friend I have from The J.M. Smucker Company who has an outdoor hobby is Blake, whom we've already discussed. However, his hobby is dancing, not homebrewing or quilting. And he's not much of a morning person either, tends to enjoy his evenings more. It seems our circles overlap but maybe not as much as we initially thought, Rafael.\"\n\nTurn #8: \n\nTurn #9: Oliver Thompson said: \"Well, it's not uncommon for different circles to intersect at a few points, Rafael. Speaking of The J.M. Smucker Company again, do you happen to know anyone there who's into dancing? Particularly someone who likes to dance outdoors in the evenings.\"\n\nTurn #10: Rafael Cortez said: \"Not exactly, but it's interesting how The J.M. Smucker Company keeps surfacing. However, regarding dancing outdoors in the evenings, it reminds me of my friend Angelica who loves homebrewing outdoors right around dusk. She's with Planet Hollywood, though. A different overlap, I guess. Oliver, do you happen to know anyone from Planet Hollywood?\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Thompson said: \"Unfortunately, Rafael, I don't recall knowing anyone from Planet Hollywood. For the most part, my friends and acquaintances are spread across a few select companies. Perhaps our circles don't overlap as much as we thought, but it's always fascinating discovering these links, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #12: Rafael Cortez said: \"Indeed, Oliver, it's fascinating. These seemingly unrelated links do create an interesting tapestry. On a side note, I recall a friend of mine, Lynn, who works at Cray. She loves homebrewing and tends to do it outdoors in the evening. Maybe, we might not have as many common friends as we first thought, yet it's been intriguing to see the overlaps and near connections, don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #13: Oliver Thompson said: \"Certainly, Rafael, it's truly been fascinating to trace these threads, even if they didn't quite lead to a shared acquaintance. You mentioned Cray, and as it happens, a friend of mine, Louise, works there. She's quite a dancer and prefers spending her free time in the evening, ideally outdoors. But homebrewing? Can't say I've heard her talk about it. It seems we might have interesting overlaps, but not identical connections. I've enjoyed this nonetheless!\"\n\nTurn #14: Rafael Cortez said: \"Yes, I agree, Oliver. Our separate circles do seem to possess unique constellations of interesting characters, and it's always fascinating to try and find those points of overlap. Even if we didn't find a mutual friend, at least we've had an intriguing conversation. I've quite enjoyed this.\"\n\nTurn #15: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, Rafael, the conversation itself has been quite enjoyable. It's been delightful learning about your circle of friends and finding the points of convergence with mine. It's a small world after all, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #16: Rafael Cortez said: \"I certainly agree, Oliver. Despite not finding a mutual friend, the conversation has been a fascinating exploration of our social connections. It's always interesting to find where our paths cross in this small world.\"\n\nTurn #17: Oliver Thompson left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #18. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nRafael Cortez's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMarie: Hobby: Acting Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nHarvey: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: Sony Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nFrank: Hobby: Deltiology Company: Ebonite International Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nVera: Hobby: Watching movies Company: Gentiva Health Services Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nLawrence: Hobby: Kayaking Company: Ebonite International Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nLouise: Hobby: Dancing Company: Cray Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nDallas: Hobby: Dancing Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nNancy: Hobby: Dancing Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nBlake: Hobby: Dancing Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening, Oliver. Great party, isn't it? It's always interesting to meet new people. Meanwhile, you can never know how many common acquaintances you might discover. Don't you agree? I mean, for instance, do you have any friends who are into homebrewing? It seems to be a favored hobby among some of my friends.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I completely agree, Rafael. It's fascinating how many shared connections can exist unknowingly. Speaking of hobbies, one of my good friends Harvey has been quite into amateur radio. It always astonishes me how he dedicates his afternoon tinkering with those radio bits. Do you happen to know any amateur radio enthusiasts, Rafael?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nRafael Cortez's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMarie: Hobby: Acting Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nHarvey: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: Sony Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nFrank: Hobby: Deltiology Company: Ebonite International Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nVera: Hobby: Watching movies Company: Gentiva Health Services Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nLawrence: Hobby: Kayaking Company: Ebonite International Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nLouise: Hobby: Dancing Company: Cray Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nDallas: Hobby: Dancing Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nNancy: Hobby: Dancing Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nBlake: Hobby: Dancing Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening, Oliver. Great party, isn't it? It's always interesting to meet new people. Meanwhile, you can never know how many common acquaintances you might discover. Don't you agree? I mean, for instance, do you have any friends who are into homebrewing? It seems to be a favored hobby among some of my friends.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"I completely agree, Rafael. It's fascinating how many shared connections can exist unknowingly. Speaking of hobbies, one of my good friends Harvey has been quite into amateur radio. It always astonishes me how he dedicates his afternoon tinkering with those radio bits. Do you happen to know any amateur radio enthusiasts, Rafael?\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Ah, amateur radio, that's quite a specific hobby. I do know of one, a friend of mine, Dennis. He's always up early in the morning, fiddling with his radio devices, I think he even works at the J.M. Smucker Company. You wouldn't happen to know anyone from there, would you?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Interesting, Rafael! One acquaintance of mine, Blake, is keen on dancing and he also works at The J.M. Smucker Company. He is more of an evening person, though, often dancing under the stars. Does the name Blake ring a bell to you?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nRafael Cortez's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMarie: Hobby: Acting Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nHarvey: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: Sony Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nFrank: Hobby: Deltiology Company: Ebonite International Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nVera: Hobby: Watching movies Company: Gentiva Health Services Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nLawrence: Hobby: Kayaking Company: Ebonite International Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nLouise: Hobby: Dancing Company: Cray Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nDallas: Hobby: Dancing Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nNancy: Hobby: Dancing Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nBlake: Hobby: Dancing Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening, Oliver. Great party, isn't it? It's always interesting to meet new people. Meanwhile, you can never know how many common acquaintances you might discover. Don't you agree? I mean, for instance, do you have any friends who are into homebrewing? It seems to be a favored hobby among some of my friends.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"I completely agree, Rafael. It's fascinating how many shared connections can exist unknowingly. Speaking of hobbies, one of my good friends Harvey has been quite into amateur radio. It always astonishes me how he dedicates his afternoon tinkering with those radio bits. Do you happen to know any amateur radio enthusiasts, Rafael?\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Ah, amateur radio, that's quite a specific hobby. I do know of one, a friend of mine, Dennis. He's always up early in the morning, fiddling with his radio devices, I think he even works at the J.M. Smucker Company. You wouldn't happen to know anyone from there, would you?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"Interesting, Rafael! One acquaintance of mine, Blake, is keen on dancing and he also works at The J.M. Smucker Company. He is more of an evening person, though, often dancing under the stars. Does the name Blake ring a bell to you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Rafael Cortez said: \"The name Blake doesn't seem to be familiar to me. But it's intriguing how the circles overlap, especially around The J.M. Smucker Company. Since we're talking about dancing, do you know anyone who spends their evenings outdoors, maybe even under the stars, working on a hobby like homebrewing or quilting? I know a couple of people like that.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, the overlap in our circles is intriguing, Rafael. Speaking of hobbies that involve evenings spent outdoors, I do know of a few. For instance, there's my friend Lawrence who is quite the kayaking enthusiast, he prefers the evenings for his adrenaline rushes in the water. Or Dallas, another friend of mine, who loves dancing the night away under the stars. Did either of those sound familiar to you?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nRafael Cortez's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMarie: Hobby: Acting Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nHarvey: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: Sony Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nFrank: Hobby: Deltiology Company: Ebonite International Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nVera: Hobby: Watching movies Company: Gentiva Health Services Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nLawrence: Hobby: Kayaking Company: Ebonite International Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nLouise: Hobby: Dancing Company: Cray Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nDallas: Hobby: Dancing Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nNancy: Hobby: Dancing Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nBlake: Hobby: Dancing Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening, Oliver. Great party, isn't it? It's always interesting to meet new people. Meanwhile, you can never know how many common acquaintances you might discover. Don't you agree? I mean, for instance, do you have any friends who are into homebrewing? It seems to be a favored hobby among some of my friends.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"I completely agree, Rafael. It's fascinating how many shared connections can exist unknowingly. Speaking of hobbies, one of my good friends Harvey has been quite into amateur radio. It always astonishes me how he dedicates his afternoon tinkering with those radio bits. Do you happen to know any amateur radio enthusiasts, Rafael?\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Ah, amateur radio, that's quite a specific hobby. I do know of one, a friend of mine, Dennis. He's always up early in the morning, fiddling with his radio devices, I think he even works at the J.M. Smucker Company. You wouldn't happen to know anyone from there, would you?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"Interesting, Rafael! One acquaintance of mine, Blake, is keen on dancing and he also works at The J.M. Smucker Company. He is more of an evening person, though, often dancing under the stars. Does the name Blake ring a bell to you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Rafael Cortez said: \"The name Blake doesn't seem to be familiar to me. But it's intriguing how the circles overlap, especially around The J.M. Smucker Company. Since we're talking about dancing, do you know anyone who spends their evenings outdoors, maybe even under the stars, working on a hobby like homebrewing or quilting? I know a couple of people like that.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, the overlap in our circles is intriguing, Rafael. Speaking of hobbies that involve evenings spent outdoors, I do know of a few. For instance, there's my friend Lawrence who is quite the kayaking enthusiast, he prefers the evenings for his adrenaline rushes in the water. Or Dallas, another friend of mine, who loves dancing the night away under the stars. Did either of those sound familiar to you?\"\n\nTurn #6: Rafael Cortez said: \"Neither Lawrence nor Dallas rings a bell, Oliver. Since we've mentioned it a couple of times already, I can't help but wonder if we share any friends from The J.M. Smucker Company. Do you know anyone from there who spends their mornings outdoors, perhaps with a hobby such as homebrewing or quilting?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"The only friend I have from The J.M. Smucker Company who has an outdoor hobby is Blake, whom we've already discussed. However, his hobby is dancing, not homebrewing or quilting. And he's not much of a morning person either, tends to enjoy his evenings more. It seems our circles overlap but maybe not as much as we initially thought, Rafael.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nRafael Cortez's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMarie: Hobby: Acting Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nHarvey: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: Sony Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nFrank: Hobby: Deltiology Company: Ebonite International Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nVera: Hobby: Watching movies Company: Gentiva Health Services Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nLawrence: Hobby: Kayaking Company: Ebonite International Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nLouise: Hobby: Dancing Company: Cray Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nDallas: Hobby: Dancing Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nNancy: Hobby: Dancing Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nBlake: Hobby: Dancing Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening, Oliver. Great party, isn't it? It's always interesting to meet new people. Meanwhile, you can never know how many common acquaintances you might discover. Don't you agree? I mean, for instance, do you have any friends who are into homebrewing? It seems to be a favored hobby among some of my friends.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"I completely agree, Rafael. It's fascinating how many shared connections can exist unknowingly. Speaking of hobbies, one of my good friends Harvey has been quite into amateur radio. It always astonishes me how he dedicates his afternoon tinkering with those radio bits. Do you happen to know any amateur radio enthusiasts, Rafael?\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Ah, amateur radio, that's quite a specific hobby. I do know of one, a friend of mine, Dennis. He's always up early in the morning, fiddling with his radio devices, I think he even works at the J.M. Smucker Company. You wouldn't happen to know anyone from there, would you?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"Interesting, Rafael! One acquaintance of mine, Blake, is keen on dancing and he also works at The J.M. Smucker Company. He is more of an evening person, though, often dancing under the stars. Does the name Blake ring a bell to you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Rafael Cortez said: \"The name Blake doesn't seem to be familiar to me. But it's intriguing how the circles overlap, especially around The J.M. Smucker Company. Since we're talking about dancing, do you know anyone who spends their evenings outdoors, maybe even under the stars, working on a hobby like homebrewing or quilting? I know a couple of people like that.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, the overlap in our circles is intriguing, Rafael. Speaking of hobbies that involve evenings spent outdoors, I do know of a few. For instance, there's my friend Lawrence who is quite the kayaking enthusiast, he prefers the evenings for his adrenaline rushes in the water. Or Dallas, another friend of mine, who loves dancing the night away under the stars. Did either of those sound familiar to you?\"\n\nTurn #6: Rafael Cortez said: \"Neither Lawrence nor Dallas rings a bell, Oliver. Since we've mentioned it a couple of times already, I can't help but wonder if we share any friends from The J.M. Smucker Company. Do you know anyone from there who spends their mornings outdoors, perhaps with a hobby such as homebrewing or quilting?\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"The only friend I have from The J.M. Smucker Company who has an outdoor hobby is Blake, whom we've already discussed. However, his hobby is dancing, not homebrewing or quilting. And he's not much of a morning person either, tends to enjoy his evenings more. It seems our circles overlap but maybe not as much as we initially thought, Rafael.\"\n\nTurn #8: \n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Well, it's not uncommon for different circles to intersect at a few points, Rafael. Speaking of The J.M. Smucker Company again, do you happen to know anyone there who's into dancing? Particularly someone who likes to dance outdoors in the evenings.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nRafael Cortez's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMarie: Hobby: Acting Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nHarvey: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: Sony Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nFrank: Hobby: Deltiology Company: Ebonite International Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nVera: Hobby: Watching movies Company: Gentiva Health Services Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nLawrence: Hobby: Kayaking Company: Ebonite International Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nLouise: Hobby: Dancing Company: Cray Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nDallas: Hobby: Dancing Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nNancy: Hobby: Dancing Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nBlake: Hobby: Dancing Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening, Oliver. Great party, isn't it? It's always interesting to meet new people. Meanwhile, you can never know how many common acquaintances you might discover. Don't you agree? I mean, for instance, do you have any friends who are into homebrewing? It seems to be a favored hobby among some of my friends.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"I completely agree, Rafael. It's fascinating how many shared connections can exist unknowingly. Speaking of hobbies, one of my good friends Harvey has been quite into amateur radio. It always astonishes me how he dedicates his afternoon tinkering with those radio bits. Do you happen to know any amateur radio enthusiasts, Rafael?\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Ah, amateur radio, that's quite a specific hobby. I do know of one, a friend of mine, Dennis. He's always up early in the morning, fiddling with his radio devices, I think he even works at the J.M. Smucker Company. You wouldn't happen to know anyone from there, would you?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"Interesting, Rafael! One acquaintance of mine, Blake, is keen on dancing and he also works at The J.M. Smucker Company. He is more of an evening person, though, often dancing under the stars. Does the name Blake ring a bell to you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Rafael Cortez said: \"The name Blake doesn't seem to be familiar to me. But it's intriguing how the circles overlap, especially around The J.M. Smucker Company. Since we're talking about dancing, do you know anyone who spends their evenings outdoors, maybe even under the stars, working on a hobby like homebrewing or quilting? I know a couple of people like that.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, the overlap in our circles is intriguing, Rafael. Speaking of hobbies that involve evenings spent outdoors, I do know of a few. For instance, there's my friend Lawrence who is quite the kayaking enthusiast, he prefers the evenings for his adrenaline rushes in the water. Or Dallas, another friend of mine, who loves dancing the night away under the stars. Did either of those sound familiar to you?\"\n\nTurn #6: Rafael Cortez said: \"Neither Lawrence nor Dallas rings a bell, Oliver. Since we've mentioned it a couple of times already, I can't help but wonder if we share any friends from The J.M. Smucker Company. Do you know anyone from there who spends their mornings outdoors, perhaps with a hobby such as homebrewing or quilting?\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"The only friend I have from The J.M. Smucker Company who has an outdoor hobby is Blake, whom we've already discussed. However, his hobby is dancing, not homebrewing or quilting. And he's not much of a morning person either, tends to enjoy his evenings more. It seems our circles overlap but maybe not as much as we initially thought, Rafael.\"\n\nTurn #8: \n\nTurn #9: Oliver Thompson said: \"Well, it's not uncommon for different circles to intersect at a few points, Rafael. Speaking of The J.M. Smucker Company again, do you happen to know anyone there who's into dancing? Particularly someone who likes to dance outdoors in the evenings.\"\n\nTurn #10: Rafael Cortez said: \"Not exactly, but it's interesting how The J.M. Smucker Company keeps surfacing. However, regarding dancing outdoors in the evenings, it reminds me of my friend Angelica who loves homebrewing outdoors right around dusk. She's with Planet Hollywood, though. A different overlap, I guess. Oliver, do you happen to know anyone from Planet Hollywood?\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Thompson said: \"Unfortunately, Rafael, I don't recall knowing anyone from Planet Hollywood. For the most part, my friends and acquaintances are spread across a few select companies. Perhaps our circles don't overlap as much as we thought, but it's always fascinating discovering these links, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #12: Rafael Cortez said: \"Indeed, Oliver, it's fascinating. These seemingly unrelated links do create an interesting tapestry. On a side note, I recall a friend of mine, Lynn, who works at Cray. She loves homebrewing and tends to do it outdoors in the evening. Maybe, we might not have as many common friends as we first thought, yet it's been intriguing to see the overlaps and near connections, don't you agree?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Certainly, Rafael, it's truly been fascinating to trace these threads, even if they didn't quite lead to a shared acquaintance. You mentioned Cray, and as it happens, a friend of mine, Louise, works there. She's quite a dancer and prefers spending her free time in the evening, ideally outdoors. But homebrewing? Can't say I've heard her talk about it. It seems we might have interesting overlaps, but not identical connections. I've enjoyed this nonetheless!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nRafael Cortez's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMarie: Hobby: Acting Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nHarvey: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: Sony Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nFrank: Hobby: Deltiology Company: Ebonite International Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nVera: Hobby: Watching movies Company: Gentiva Health Services Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nLawrence: Hobby: Kayaking Company: Ebonite International Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nLouise: Hobby: Dancing Company: Cray Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nDallas: Hobby: Dancing Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nNancy: Hobby: Dancing Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nBlake: Hobby: Dancing Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening, Oliver. Great party, isn't it? It's always interesting to meet new people. Meanwhile, you can never know how many common acquaintances you might discover. Don't you agree? I mean, for instance, do you have any friends who are into homebrewing? It seems to be a favored hobby among some of my friends.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"I completely agree, Rafael. It's fascinating how many shared connections can exist unknowingly. Speaking of hobbies, one of my good friends Harvey has been quite into amateur radio. It always astonishes me how he dedicates his afternoon tinkering with those radio bits. Do you happen to know any amateur radio enthusiasts, Rafael?\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Ah, amateur radio, that's quite a specific hobby. I do know of one, a friend of mine, Dennis. He's always up early in the morning, fiddling with his radio devices, I think he even works at the J.M. Smucker Company. You wouldn't happen to know anyone from there, would you?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"Interesting, Rafael! One acquaintance of mine, Blake, is keen on dancing and he also works at The J.M. Smucker Company. He is more of an evening person, though, often dancing under the stars. Does the name Blake ring a bell to you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Rafael Cortez said: \"The name Blake doesn't seem to be familiar to me. But it's intriguing how the circles overlap, especially around The J.M. Smucker Company. Since we're talking about dancing, do you know anyone who spends their evenings outdoors, maybe even under the stars, working on a hobby like homebrewing or quilting? I know a couple of people like that.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, the overlap in our circles is intriguing, Rafael. Speaking of hobbies that involve evenings spent outdoors, I do know of a few. For instance, there's my friend Lawrence who is quite the kayaking enthusiast, he prefers the evenings for his adrenaline rushes in the water. Or Dallas, another friend of mine, who loves dancing the night away under the stars. Did either of those sound familiar to you?\"\n\nTurn #6: Rafael Cortez said: \"Neither Lawrence nor Dallas rings a bell, Oliver. Since we've mentioned it a couple of times already, I can't help but wonder if we share any friends from The J.M. Smucker Company. Do you know anyone from there who spends their mornings outdoors, perhaps with a hobby such as homebrewing or quilting?\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"The only friend I have from The J.M. Smucker Company who has an outdoor hobby is Blake, whom we've already discussed. However, his hobby is dancing, not homebrewing or quilting. And he's not much of a morning person either, tends to enjoy his evenings more. It seems our circles overlap but maybe not as much as we initially thought, Rafael.\"\n\nTurn #8: \n\nTurn #9: Oliver Thompson said: \"Well, it's not uncommon for different circles to intersect at a few points, Rafael. Speaking of The J.M. Smucker Company again, do you happen to know anyone there who's into dancing? Particularly someone who likes to dance outdoors in the evenings.\"\n\nTurn #10: Rafael Cortez said: \"Not exactly, but it's interesting how The J.M. Smucker Company keeps surfacing. However, regarding dancing outdoors in the evenings, it reminds me of my friend Angelica who loves homebrewing outdoors right around dusk. She's with Planet Hollywood, though. A different overlap, I guess. Oliver, do you happen to know anyone from Planet Hollywood?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Unfortunately, Rafael, I don't recall knowing anyone from Planet Hollywood. For the most part, my friends and acquaintances are spread across a few select companies. Perhaps our circles don't overlap as much as we thought, but it's always fascinating discovering these links, isn't it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nRafael Cortez's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMarie: Hobby: Acting Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nHarvey: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: Sony Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nFrank: Hobby: Deltiology Company: Ebonite International Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nVera: Hobby: Watching movies Company: Gentiva Health Services Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nLawrence: Hobby: Kayaking Company: Ebonite International Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nLouise: Hobby: Dancing Company: Cray Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nDallas: Hobby: Dancing Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nNancy: Hobby: Dancing Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nBlake: Hobby: Dancing Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening, Oliver. Great party, isn't it? It's always interesting to meet new people. Meanwhile, you can never know how many common acquaintances you might discover. Don't you agree? I mean, for instance, do you have any friends who are into homebrewing? It seems to be a favored hobby among some of my friends.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"I completely agree, Rafael. It's fascinating how many shared connections can exist unknowingly. Speaking of hobbies, one of my good friends Harvey has been quite into amateur radio. It always astonishes me how he dedicates his afternoon tinkering with those radio bits. Do you happen to know any amateur radio enthusiasts, Rafael?\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Ah, amateur radio, that's quite a specific hobby. I do know of one, a friend of mine, Dennis. He's always up early in the morning, fiddling with his radio devices, I think he even works at the J.M. Smucker Company. You wouldn't happen to know anyone from there, would you?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"Interesting, Rafael! One acquaintance of mine, Blake, is keen on dancing and he also works at The J.M. Smucker Company. He is more of an evening person, though, often dancing under the stars. Does the name Blake ring a bell to you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Rafael Cortez said: \"The name Blake doesn't seem to be familiar to me. But it's intriguing how the circles overlap, especially around The J.M. Smucker Company. Since we're talking about dancing, do you know anyone who spends their evenings outdoors, maybe even under the stars, working on a hobby like homebrewing or quilting? I know a couple of people like that.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, the overlap in our circles is intriguing, Rafael. Speaking of hobbies that involve evenings spent outdoors, I do know of a few. For instance, there's my friend Lawrence who is quite the kayaking enthusiast, he prefers the evenings for his adrenaline rushes in the water. Or Dallas, another friend of mine, who loves dancing the night away under the stars. Did either of those sound familiar to you?\"\n\nTurn #6: Rafael Cortez said: \"Neither Lawrence nor Dallas rings a bell, Oliver. Since we've mentioned it a couple of times already, I can't help but wonder if we share any friends from The J.M. Smucker Company. Do you know anyone from there who spends their mornings outdoors, perhaps with a hobby such as homebrewing or quilting?\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"The only friend I have from The J.M. Smucker Company who has an outdoor hobby is Blake, whom we've already discussed. However, his hobby is dancing, not homebrewing or quilting. And he's not much of a morning person either, tends to enjoy his evenings more. It seems our circles overlap but maybe not as much as we initially thought, Rafael.\"\n\nTurn #8: \n\nTurn #9: Oliver Thompson said: \"Well, it's not uncommon for different circles to intersect at a few points, Rafael. Speaking of The J.M. Smucker Company again, do you happen to know anyone there who's into dancing? Particularly someone who likes to dance outdoors in the evenings.\"\n\nTurn #10: Rafael Cortez said: \"Not exactly, but it's interesting how The J.M. Smucker Company keeps surfacing. However, regarding dancing outdoors in the evenings, it reminds me of my friend Angelica who loves homebrewing outdoors right around dusk. She's with Planet Hollywood, though. A different overlap, I guess. Oliver, do you happen to know anyone from Planet Hollywood?\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Thompson said: \"Unfortunately, Rafael, I don't recall knowing anyone from Planet Hollywood. For the most part, my friends and acquaintances are spread across a few select companies. Perhaps our circles don't overlap as much as we thought, but it's always fascinating discovering these links, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #12: Rafael Cortez said: \"Indeed, Oliver, it's fascinating. These seemingly unrelated links do create an interesting tapestry. On a side note, I recall a friend of mine, Lynn, who works at Cray. She loves homebrewing and tends to do it outdoors in the evening. Maybe, we might not have as many common friends as we first thought, yet it's been intriguing to see the overlaps and near connections, don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #13: Oliver Thompson said: \"Certainly, Rafael, it's truly been fascinating to trace these threads, even if they didn't quite lead to a shared acquaintance. You mentioned Cray, and as it happens, a friend of mine, Louise, works there. She's quite a dancer and prefers spending her free time in the evening, ideally outdoors. But homebrewing? Can't say I've heard her talk about it. It seems we might have interesting overlaps, but not identical connections. I've enjoyed this nonetheless!\"\n\nTurn #14: Rafael Cortez said: \"Yes, I agree, Oliver. Our separate circles do seem to possess unique constellations of interesting characters, and it's always fascinating to try and find those points of overlap. Even if we didn't find a mutual friend, at least we've had an intriguing conversation. I've quite enjoyed this.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, Rafael, the conversation itself has been quite enjoyable. It's been delightful learning about your circle of friends and finding the points of convergence with mine. It's a small world after all, isn't it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nRafael Cortez's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMarie: Hobby: Acting Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nHarvey: Hobby: Amateur radio Company: Sony Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nFrank: Hobby: Deltiology Company: Ebonite International Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nVera: Hobby: Watching movies Company: Gentiva Health Services Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: indoor \nLawrence: Hobby: Kayaking Company: Ebonite International Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nLouise: Hobby: Dancing Company: Cray Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nDallas: Hobby: Dancing Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor \nNancy: Hobby: Dancing Company: Southern New England Telephone Time Preference: afternoon Location Preference: outdoor \nBlake: Hobby: Dancing Company: The J.M. Smucker Company Time Preference: evening Location Preference: outdoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening, Oliver. Great party, isn't it? It's always interesting to meet new people. Meanwhile, you can never know how many common acquaintances you might discover. Don't you agree? I mean, for instance, do you have any friends who are into homebrewing? It seems to be a favored hobby among some of my friends.\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"I completely agree, Rafael. It's fascinating how many shared connections can exist unknowingly. Speaking of hobbies, one of my good friends Harvey has been quite into amateur radio. It always astonishes me how he dedicates his afternoon tinkering with those radio bits. Do you happen to know any amateur radio enthusiasts, Rafael?\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Ah, amateur radio, that's quite a specific hobby. I do know of one, a friend of mine, Dennis. He's always up early in the morning, fiddling with his radio devices, I think he even works at the J.M. Smucker Company. You wouldn't happen to know anyone from there, would you?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"Interesting, Rafael! One acquaintance of mine, Blake, is keen on dancing and he also works at The J.M. Smucker Company. He is more of an evening person, though, often dancing under the stars. Does the name Blake ring a bell to you?\"\n\nTurn #4: Rafael Cortez said: \"The name Blake doesn't seem to be familiar to me. But it's intriguing how the circles overlap, especially around The J.M. Smucker Company. Since we're talking about dancing, do you know anyone who spends their evenings outdoors, maybe even under the stars, working on a hobby like homebrewing or quilting? I know a couple of people like that.\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, the overlap in our circles is intriguing, Rafael. Speaking of hobbies that involve evenings spent outdoors, I do know of a few. For instance, there's my friend Lawrence who is quite the kayaking enthusiast, he prefers the evenings for his adrenaline rushes in the water. Or Dallas, another friend of mine, who loves dancing the night away under the stars. Did either of those sound familiar to you?\"\n\nTurn #6: Rafael Cortez said: \"Neither Lawrence nor Dallas rings a bell, Oliver. Since we've mentioned it a couple of times already, I can't help but wonder if we share any friends from The J.M. Smucker Company. Do you know anyone from there who spends their mornings outdoors, perhaps with a hobby such as homebrewing or quilting?\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"The only friend I have from The J.M. Smucker Company who has an outdoor hobby is Blake, whom we've already discussed. However, his hobby is dancing, not homebrewing or quilting. And he's not much of a morning person either, tends to enjoy his evenings more. It seems our circles overlap but maybe not as much as we initially thought, Rafael.\"\n\nTurn #8: \n\nTurn #9: Oliver Thompson said: \"Well, it's not uncommon for different circles to intersect at a few points, Rafael. Speaking of The J.M. Smucker Company again, do you happen to know anyone there who's into dancing? Particularly someone who likes to dance outdoors in the evenings.\"\n\nTurn #10: Rafael Cortez said: \"Not exactly, but it's interesting how The J.M. Smucker Company keeps surfacing. However, regarding dancing outdoors in the evenings, it reminds me of my friend Angelica who loves homebrewing outdoors right around dusk. She's with Planet Hollywood, though. A different overlap, I guess. Oliver, do you happen to know anyone from Planet Hollywood?\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Thompson said: \"Unfortunately, Rafael, I don't recall knowing anyone from Planet Hollywood. For the most part, my friends and acquaintances are spread across a few select companies. Perhaps our circles don't overlap as much as we thought, but it's always fascinating discovering these links, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #12: Rafael Cortez said: \"Indeed, Oliver, it's fascinating. These seemingly unrelated links do create an interesting tapestry. On a side note, I recall a friend of mine, Lynn, who works at Cray. She loves homebrewing and tends to do it outdoors in the evening. Maybe, we might not have as many common friends as we first thought, yet it's been intriguing to see the overlaps and near connections, don't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #13: Oliver Thompson said: \"Certainly, Rafael, it's truly been fascinating to trace these threads, even if they didn't quite lead to a shared acquaintance. You mentioned Cray, and as it happens, a friend of mine, Louise, works there. She's quite a dancer and prefers spending her free time in the evening, ideally outdoors. But homebrewing? Can't say I've heard her talk about it. It seems we might have interesting overlaps, but not identical connections. I've enjoyed this nonetheless!\"\n\nTurn #14: Rafael Cortez said: \"Yes, I agree, Oliver. Our separate circles do seem to possess unique constellations of interesting characters, and it's always fascinating to try and find those points of overlap. Even if we didn't find a mutual friend, at least we've had an intriguing conversation. I've quite enjoyed this.\"\n\nTurn #15: Oliver Thompson said: \"Indeed, Rafael, the conversation itself has been quite enjoyable. It's been delightful learning about your circle of friends and finding the points of convergence with mine. It's a small world after all, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #16: Rafael Cortez said: \"I certainly agree, Oliver. Despite not finding a mutual friend, the conversation has been a fascinating exploration of our social connections. It's always interesting to find where our paths cross in this small world.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Ethan Smith and Noah Davis\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nNoah Davis's background: \nEthan Smith's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nElizabeth: School: Eastern Nazarene College Time Preference: morning Major: Social Science Education Location Preference: outdoor \nEric: School: San Jose State University Time Preference: evening Major: Geological Engineering Location Preference: outdoor \nLeroy: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nThanh: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nMarva: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Bioengineering Location Preference: outdoor \nMichael: School: Williams College Time Preference: morning Major: Marine Biology Location Preference: outdoor \nVirginia: School: Williams College Time Preference: evening Major: Applied Mathematics Location Preference: outdoor \nDebra: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Psychology Location Preference: outdoor \nEugenia: School: Stephens College Time Preference: morning Major: Psychology Location Preference: outdoor \nRoberto: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: morning Major: Electrical Technology Location Preference: outdoor \nMark: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: morning Major: Sports, Recreation, & Leisure Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nGeorgene: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: evening Major: Bioengineering Location Preference: outdoor \n\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hi, I'm Ethan. Nice to meet you. Are you originally from around here?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Ethan Smith and Noah Davis\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nNoah Davis's background: \nEthan Smith's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nElizabeth: School: Eastern Nazarene College Time Preference: morning Major: Social Science Education Location Preference: outdoor \nEric: School: San Jose State University Time Preference: evening Major: Geological Engineering Location Preference: outdoor \nLeroy: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nThanh: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nMarva: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Bioengineering Location Preference: outdoor \nMichael: School: Williams College Time Preference: morning Major: Marine Biology Location Preference: outdoor \nVirginia: School: Williams College Time Preference: evening Major: Applied Mathematics Location Preference: outdoor \nDebra: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Psychology Location Preference: outdoor \nEugenia: School: Stephens College Time Preference: morning Major: Psychology Location Preference: outdoor \nRoberto: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: morning Major: Electrical Technology Location Preference: outdoor \nMark: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: morning Major: Sports, Recreation, & Leisure Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nGeorgene: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: evening Major: Bioengineering Location Preference: outdoor \n\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Smith said: \"Hi, I'm Ethan. Nice to meet you. Are you originally from around here?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hello Ethan, I'm Noah. Not originally, but I've been living here for a while now. Say, did you happen to go to college around here?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Well, I didn\u2019t go to college here, although I do know a bunch of people from various colleges, both nearby and away. They majored in a wide array of disciplines from Greek to Bioengineering. Gotta say, it's enjoyable talking to them about their experiences. How about you? What was your major in college?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Ethan Smith and Noah Davis\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nNoah Davis's background: \nEthan Smith's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nElizabeth: School: Eastern Nazarene College Time Preference: morning Major: Social Science Education Location Preference: outdoor \nEric: School: San Jose State University Time Preference: evening Major: Geological Engineering Location Preference: outdoor \nLeroy: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nThanh: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nMarva: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Bioengineering Location Preference: outdoor \nMichael: School: Williams College Time Preference: morning Major: Marine Biology Location Preference: outdoor \nVirginia: School: Williams College Time Preference: evening Major: Applied Mathematics Location Preference: outdoor \nDebra: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Psychology Location Preference: outdoor \nEugenia: School: Stephens College Time Preference: morning Major: Psychology Location Preference: outdoor \nRoberto: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: morning Major: Electrical Technology Location Preference: outdoor \nMark: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: morning Major: Sports, Recreation, & Leisure Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nGeorgene: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: evening Major: Bioengineering Location Preference: outdoor \n\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Smith said: \"Hi, I'm Ethan. Nice to meet you. Are you originally from around here?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hello Ethan, I'm Noah. Not originally, but I've been living here for a while now. Say, did you happen to go to college around here?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Smith said: \"Well, I didn\u2019t go to college here, although I do know a bunch of people from various colleges, both nearby and away. They majored in a wide array of disciplines from Greek to Bioengineering. Gotta say, it's enjoyable talking to them about their experiences. How about you? What was your major in college?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I majored in Physical Education since I always had an affinity for sports. It's funny that you mentioned Greek as one of the majors. I have a few friends who studied that in college. Do you happen to know a Janet or a Thanh?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Smith said: \"That's cool, Noah, Physical Education sounds like a challenging but fun path. And, funny you should mention Thanh, I happen to know a Thanh myself. He studied Greek at Williams College and preferred outdoor activities in the afternoon. Perhaps it's the same person you know?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Wow, it's certainly a small world, Ethan! That's the exact same Thanh I know, really great guy with a sharp mind. By any chance, do you also happen to know someone who majored in Conflict Resolution Studies? I've got a couple of friends who studied that, Brenda and Anthony, each at different colleges.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Smith said: \"Hmm, Conflict Resolution Studies, that sounds fascinating. However, I don't think I know a Brenda or Anthony who studied that. Most of the friends I made during my college years were from within my immediate major or those I encountered through shared hobbies and interests.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"No worries, Ethan. Talking about shared hobbies and interests, I've come across quite a few interesting characters within different friend circles. By the way, do you know any Arts and Crafts enthusiasts? A good friend of mine, Alice, majored in Crafts & Artisanry at Trenton State College. Maybe you've crossed paths?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Smith said: \"Art and Crafts, hey? That's a unique choice of major. I have a friend, Leroy, who studied Greek at Trenton State College. Same college, but I'm not sure if he knows Alice. So, you mentioned sports earlier. Did you enjoy outdoor activities in the evening like my friend Eric?\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"I actually do enjoy the outdoors, but I'm mostly an afternoon person. Interestingly, Brenda, the friend I mentioned earlier with a Conflict Resolution Studies background, she's a fan of outdoor activities in the evening. Seems like Eric and Brenda might have a thing or two in common. Eric, was he from Trenton State College too?\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Smith said: \"No, Eric actually went to San Jose State University. Like you and Brenda, he also enjoys outdoor activities, although he prefers the evening. It's quite fascinating how we all have overlapping interests and paths, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. It's the crossover of interests and paths that makes social interactions so rich. By the way, are you familiar with folks from Williams College? I had a couple of friends, Thomas and James who went there. Both loved afternoon activities. Thomas studied Asian Languages, while James was into Materials Engineering.\"\n\nTurn #12: Ethan Smith said: \"Yes, I do know people from Williams College. I have friends who studied a variety of majors there and enjoyed outdoor activities at different times of the day. For instance, Debra studied Psychology and liked outdoor activities in the afternoon. Though, I can't say I know a Thomas or James. It is indeed fascinating how our worlds collide and intersect in unexpected ways.\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, Ethan, it's incredible to see the unexpected connections and commonalities we share. I have thoroughly enjoyed our conversation. Speaking of which, I have a friend named Robert who attended Rutgers University. He was into Protestant Affiliation and preferred indoor activities in the morning. It seems like a rare major. Does it sound familiar to you?\"\n\nTurn #14: Ethan Smith said: \"Rutgers University, that's a well-known institution indeed. Protestant Affiliation seems to be a rather niche major. I don't think I know anyone myself who studied that. I do have a buddy named Roberto who went to the University of Arkansas - Fayetteville, majored in Electrical Technology. His preference was also indoor activities but unlike Robert, Roberto was more of a morning person. These connections make for interesting conversations, don't they?\"\n\nTurn #15: Noah Davis said: \"That's quite amusing, Ethan! Electrical Technology reminds me of my friend Kristen who studied the same major at Oberlin College. And like Roberto, she was more of an evening person. With these countless overlaps, I'm sure we'll come across a mutual friend soon enough. These truly are the times when you realize what a small world we live in!\"\n\nTurn #16: Ethan Smith said: \"Your friend Kristen sounds quite interesting, Noah. Electrical Technology is indeed a fascinating field. You're right, with these overlaps, it wouldn't surprise me to find we have a mutual connection. Isn't it captivating how everyone's lives intertwine in some way or another?\"\n\nTurn #17: Noah Davis said: \"Completely agree with you, Ethan. This intertwining of life paths is what makes every interaction unique and interesting. By the way, do you know anyone from Muskingum College? I have two friends, Edgar and Elvera, who studied there. Edgar majored in Conflict Resolution Studies and preferred outdoor activities in the morning, while Elvera was into Crafts & Artisanry and she liked spending her afternoons outdoors.\"\n\nTurn #18: Ethan Smith said: \"Muskingum College, you say? I don't think I know anyone from there. But it's interesting how college topics can lead us to meet so many different individuals with diverse interests and majors. Sports, Greek, BioEngineering, and even Electrical Technology - it's like a vast network of knowledge and skills across various fields. And it's fascinating to see how paths cross, interests overlap, and how seemingly unrelated connections can lead to mutual friendships.\"\n\nTurn #19: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. It's all these unique and diverse connections that truly enrich our life experiences. By the way, ever encounter someone fascinating from Oberlin College? I remembered Anthony, an incredible friend of mine who made an impression on everyone. He was majoring in Conflict Resolution Studies and preferred outdoor activities in the morning. Quite unique, don't you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #20. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Conflict Resolution Studies continues to impress me as a major, Noah. I don't believe I know an Anthony from Oberlin College, but I find those majoring in such a field could lead to meaningful and important discussions. It does cast my mind back to my friend Eric from San Jose State University again, who, like Anthony, also prefers outdoor activities but in the evening. There's a correlation between diverse interests and personal choices leading to these interconnections, wouldn't you agree?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Ethan Smith and Noah Davis\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nNoah Davis's background: \nEthan Smith's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nElizabeth: School: Eastern Nazarene College Time Preference: morning Major: Social Science Education Location Preference: outdoor \nEric: School: San Jose State University Time Preference: evening Major: Geological Engineering Location Preference: outdoor \nLeroy: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nThanh: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nMarva: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Bioengineering Location Preference: outdoor \nMichael: School: Williams College Time Preference: morning Major: Marine Biology Location Preference: outdoor \nVirginia: School: Williams College Time Preference: evening Major: Applied Mathematics Location Preference: outdoor \nDebra: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Psychology Location Preference: outdoor \nEugenia: School: Stephens College Time Preference: morning Major: Psychology Location Preference: outdoor \nRoberto: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: morning Major: Electrical Technology Location Preference: outdoor \nMark: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: morning Major: Sports, Recreation, & Leisure Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nGeorgene: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: evening Major: Bioengineering Location Preference: outdoor \n\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Smith said: \"Hi, I'm Ethan. Nice to meet you. Are you originally from around here?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hello Ethan, I'm Noah. Not originally, but I've been living here for a while now. Say, did you happen to go to college around here?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Smith said: \"Well, I didn\u2019t go to college here, although I do know a bunch of people from various colleges, both nearby and away. They majored in a wide array of disciplines from Greek to Bioengineering. Gotta say, it's enjoyable talking to them about their experiences. How about you? What was your major in college?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I majored in Physical Education since I always had an affinity for sports. It's funny that you mentioned Greek as one of the majors. I have a few friends who studied that in college. Do you happen to know a Janet or a Thanh?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's cool, Noah, Physical Education sounds like a challenging but fun path. And, funny you should mention Thanh, I happen to know a Thanh myself. He studied Greek at Williams College and preferred outdoor activities in the afternoon. Perhaps it's the same person you know?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Ethan Smith and Noah Davis\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nNoah Davis's background: \nEthan Smith's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nElizabeth: School: Eastern Nazarene College Time Preference: morning Major: Social Science Education Location Preference: outdoor \nEric: School: San Jose State University Time Preference: evening Major: Geological Engineering Location Preference: outdoor \nLeroy: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nThanh: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nMarva: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Bioengineering Location Preference: outdoor \nMichael: School: Williams College Time Preference: morning Major: Marine Biology Location Preference: outdoor \nVirginia: School: Williams College Time Preference: evening Major: Applied Mathematics Location Preference: outdoor \nDebra: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Psychology Location Preference: outdoor \nEugenia: School: Stephens College Time Preference: morning Major: Psychology Location Preference: outdoor \nRoberto: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: morning Major: Electrical Technology Location Preference: outdoor \nMark: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: morning Major: Sports, Recreation, & Leisure Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nGeorgene: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: evening Major: Bioengineering Location Preference: outdoor \n\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Smith said: \"Hi, I'm Ethan. Nice to meet you. Are you originally from around here?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hello Ethan, I'm Noah. Not originally, but I've been living here for a while now. Say, did you happen to go to college around here?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Smith said: \"Well, I didn\u2019t go to college here, although I do know a bunch of people from various colleges, both nearby and away. They majored in a wide array of disciplines from Greek to Bioengineering. Gotta say, it's enjoyable talking to them about their experiences. How about you? What was your major in college?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I majored in Physical Education since I always had an affinity for sports. It's funny that you mentioned Greek as one of the majors. I have a few friends who studied that in college. Do you happen to know a Janet or a Thanh?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Smith said: \"That's cool, Noah, Physical Education sounds like a challenging but fun path. And, funny you should mention Thanh, I happen to know a Thanh myself. He studied Greek at Williams College and preferred outdoor activities in the afternoon. Perhaps it's the same person you know?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Wow, it's certainly a small world, Ethan! That's the exact same Thanh I know, really great guy with a sharp mind. By any chance, do you also happen to know someone who majored in Conflict Resolution Studies? I've got a couple of friends who studied that, Brenda and Anthony, each at different colleges.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hmm, Conflict Resolution Studies, that sounds fascinating. However, I don't think I know a Brenda or Anthony who studied that. Most of the friends I made during my college years were from within my immediate major or those I encountered through shared hobbies and interests.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Ethan Smith and Noah Davis\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nNoah Davis's background: \nEthan Smith's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nElizabeth: School: Eastern Nazarene College Time Preference: morning Major: Social Science Education Location Preference: outdoor \nEric: School: San Jose State University Time Preference: evening Major: Geological Engineering Location Preference: outdoor \nLeroy: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nThanh: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nMarva: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Bioengineering Location Preference: outdoor \nMichael: School: Williams College Time Preference: morning Major: Marine Biology Location Preference: outdoor \nVirginia: School: Williams College Time Preference: evening Major: Applied Mathematics Location Preference: outdoor \nDebra: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Psychology Location Preference: outdoor \nEugenia: School: Stephens College Time Preference: morning Major: Psychology Location Preference: outdoor \nRoberto: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: morning Major: Electrical Technology Location Preference: outdoor \nMark: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: morning Major: Sports, Recreation, & Leisure Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nGeorgene: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: evening Major: Bioengineering Location Preference: outdoor \n\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Smith said: \"Hi, I'm Ethan. Nice to meet you. Are you originally from around here?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hello Ethan, I'm Noah. Not originally, but I've been living here for a while now. Say, did you happen to go to college around here?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Smith said: \"Well, I didn\u2019t go to college here, although I do know a bunch of people from various colleges, both nearby and away. They majored in a wide array of disciplines from Greek to Bioengineering. Gotta say, it's enjoyable talking to them about their experiences. How about you? What was your major in college?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I majored in Physical Education since I always had an affinity for sports. It's funny that you mentioned Greek as one of the majors. I have a few friends who studied that in college. Do you happen to know a Janet or a Thanh?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Smith said: \"That's cool, Noah, Physical Education sounds like a challenging but fun path. And, funny you should mention Thanh, I happen to know a Thanh myself. He studied Greek at Williams College and preferred outdoor activities in the afternoon. Perhaps it's the same person you know?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Wow, it's certainly a small world, Ethan! That's the exact same Thanh I know, really great guy with a sharp mind. By any chance, do you also happen to know someone who majored in Conflict Resolution Studies? I've got a couple of friends who studied that, Brenda and Anthony, each at different colleges.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Smith said: \"Hmm, Conflict Resolution Studies, that sounds fascinating. However, I don't think I know a Brenda or Anthony who studied that. Most of the friends I made during my college years were from within my immediate major or those I encountered through shared hobbies and interests.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"No worries, Ethan. Talking about shared hobbies and interests, I've come across quite a few interesting characters within different friend circles. By the way, do you know any Arts and Crafts enthusiasts? A good friend of mine, Alice, majored in Crafts & Artisanry at Trenton State College. Maybe you've crossed paths?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Art and Crafts, hey? That's a unique choice of major. I have a friend, Leroy, who studied Greek at Trenton State College. Same college, but I'm not sure if he knows Alice. So, you mentioned sports earlier. Did you enjoy outdoor activities in the evening like my friend Eric?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Ethan Smith and Noah Davis\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nNoah Davis's background: \nEthan Smith's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nElizabeth: School: Eastern Nazarene College Time Preference: morning Major: Social Science Education Location Preference: outdoor \nEric: School: San Jose State University Time Preference: evening Major: Geological Engineering Location Preference: outdoor \nLeroy: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nThanh: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nMarva: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Bioengineering Location Preference: outdoor \nMichael: School: Williams College Time Preference: morning Major: Marine Biology Location Preference: outdoor \nVirginia: School: Williams College Time Preference: evening Major: Applied Mathematics Location Preference: outdoor \nDebra: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Psychology Location Preference: outdoor \nEugenia: School: Stephens College Time Preference: morning Major: Psychology Location Preference: outdoor \nRoberto: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: morning Major: Electrical Technology Location Preference: outdoor \nMark: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: morning Major: Sports, Recreation, & Leisure Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nGeorgene: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: evening Major: Bioengineering Location Preference: outdoor \n\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Smith said: \"Hi, I'm Ethan. Nice to meet you. Are you originally from around here?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hello Ethan, I'm Noah. Not originally, but I've been living here for a while now. Say, did you happen to go to college around here?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Smith said: \"Well, I didn\u2019t go to college here, although I do know a bunch of people from various colleges, both nearby and away. They majored in a wide array of disciplines from Greek to Bioengineering. Gotta say, it's enjoyable talking to them about their experiences. How about you? What was your major in college?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I majored in Physical Education since I always had an affinity for sports. It's funny that you mentioned Greek as one of the majors. I have a few friends who studied that in college. Do you happen to know a Janet or a Thanh?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Smith said: \"That's cool, Noah, Physical Education sounds like a challenging but fun path. And, funny you should mention Thanh, I happen to know a Thanh myself. He studied Greek at Williams College and preferred outdoor activities in the afternoon. Perhaps it's the same person you know?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Wow, it's certainly a small world, Ethan! That's the exact same Thanh I know, really great guy with a sharp mind. By any chance, do you also happen to know someone who majored in Conflict Resolution Studies? I've got a couple of friends who studied that, Brenda and Anthony, each at different colleges.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Smith said: \"Hmm, Conflict Resolution Studies, that sounds fascinating. However, I don't think I know a Brenda or Anthony who studied that. Most of the friends I made during my college years were from within my immediate major or those I encountered through shared hobbies and interests.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"No worries, Ethan. Talking about shared hobbies and interests, I've come across quite a few interesting characters within different friend circles. By the way, do you know any Arts and Crafts enthusiasts? A good friend of mine, Alice, majored in Crafts & Artisanry at Trenton State College. Maybe you've crossed paths?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Smith said: \"Art and Crafts, hey? That's a unique choice of major. I have a friend, Leroy, who studied Greek at Trenton State College. Same college, but I'm not sure if he knows Alice. So, you mentioned sports earlier. Did you enjoy outdoor activities in the evening like my friend Eric?\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"I actually do enjoy the outdoors, but I'm mostly an afternoon person. Interestingly, Brenda, the friend I mentioned earlier with a Conflict Resolution Studies background, she's a fan of outdoor activities in the evening. Seems like Eric and Brenda might have a thing or two in common. Eric, was he from Trenton State College too?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"No, Eric actually went to San Jose State University. Like you and Brenda, he also enjoys outdoor activities, although he prefers the evening. It's quite fascinating how we all have overlapping interests and paths, isn't it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Ethan Smith and Noah Davis\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nNoah Davis's background: \nEthan Smith's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nElizabeth: School: Eastern Nazarene College Time Preference: morning Major: Social Science Education Location Preference: outdoor \nEric: School: San Jose State University Time Preference: evening Major: Geological Engineering Location Preference: outdoor \nLeroy: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nThanh: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nMarva: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Bioengineering Location Preference: outdoor \nMichael: School: Williams College Time Preference: morning Major: Marine Biology Location Preference: outdoor \nVirginia: School: Williams College Time Preference: evening Major: Applied Mathematics Location Preference: outdoor \nDebra: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Psychology Location Preference: outdoor \nEugenia: School: Stephens College Time Preference: morning Major: Psychology Location Preference: outdoor \nRoberto: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: morning Major: Electrical Technology Location Preference: outdoor \nMark: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: morning Major: Sports, Recreation, & Leisure Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nGeorgene: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: evening Major: Bioengineering Location Preference: outdoor \n\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Smith said: \"Hi, I'm Ethan. Nice to meet you. Are you originally from around here?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hello Ethan, I'm Noah. Not originally, but I've been living here for a while now. Say, did you happen to go to college around here?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Smith said: \"Well, I didn\u2019t go to college here, although I do know a bunch of people from various colleges, both nearby and away. They majored in a wide array of disciplines from Greek to Bioengineering. Gotta say, it's enjoyable talking to them about their experiences. How about you? What was your major in college?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I majored in Physical Education since I always had an affinity for sports. It's funny that you mentioned Greek as one of the majors. I have a few friends who studied that in college. Do you happen to know a Janet or a Thanh?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Smith said: \"That's cool, Noah, Physical Education sounds like a challenging but fun path. And, funny you should mention Thanh, I happen to know a Thanh myself. He studied Greek at Williams College and preferred outdoor activities in the afternoon. Perhaps it's the same person you know?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Wow, it's certainly a small world, Ethan! That's the exact same Thanh I know, really great guy with a sharp mind. By any chance, do you also happen to know someone who majored in Conflict Resolution Studies? I've got a couple of friends who studied that, Brenda and Anthony, each at different colleges.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Smith said: \"Hmm, Conflict Resolution Studies, that sounds fascinating. However, I don't think I know a Brenda or Anthony who studied that. Most of the friends I made during my college years were from within my immediate major or those I encountered through shared hobbies and interests.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"No worries, Ethan. Talking about shared hobbies and interests, I've come across quite a few interesting characters within different friend circles. By the way, do you know any Arts and Crafts enthusiasts? A good friend of mine, Alice, majored in Crafts & Artisanry at Trenton State College. Maybe you've crossed paths?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Smith said: \"Art and Crafts, hey? That's a unique choice of major. I have a friend, Leroy, who studied Greek at Trenton State College. Same college, but I'm not sure if he knows Alice. So, you mentioned sports earlier. Did you enjoy outdoor activities in the evening like my friend Eric?\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"I actually do enjoy the outdoors, but I'm mostly an afternoon person. Interestingly, Brenda, the friend I mentioned earlier with a Conflict Resolution Studies background, she's a fan of outdoor activities in the evening. Seems like Eric and Brenda might have a thing or two in common. Eric, was he from Trenton State College too?\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Smith said: \"No, Eric actually went to San Jose State University. Like you and Brenda, he also enjoys outdoor activities, although he prefers the evening. It's quite fascinating how we all have overlapping interests and paths, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. It's the crossover of interests and paths that makes social interactions so rich. By the way, are you familiar with folks from Williams College? I had a couple of friends, Thomas and James who went there. Both loved afternoon activities. Thomas studied Asian Languages, while James was into Materials Engineering.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Yes, I do know people from Williams College. I have friends who studied a variety of majors there and enjoyed outdoor activities at different times of the day. For instance, Debra studied Psychology and liked outdoor activities in the afternoon. Though, I can't say I know a Thomas or James. It is indeed fascinating how our worlds collide and intersect in unexpected ways.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Ethan Smith and Noah Davis\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nNoah Davis's background: \nEthan Smith's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nElizabeth: School: Eastern Nazarene College Time Preference: morning Major: Social Science Education Location Preference: outdoor \nEric: School: San Jose State University Time Preference: evening Major: Geological Engineering Location Preference: outdoor \nLeroy: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nThanh: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nMarva: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Bioengineering Location Preference: outdoor \nMichael: School: Williams College Time Preference: morning Major: Marine Biology Location Preference: outdoor \nVirginia: School: Williams College Time Preference: evening Major: Applied Mathematics Location Preference: outdoor \nDebra: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Psychology Location Preference: outdoor \nEugenia: School: Stephens College Time Preference: morning Major: Psychology Location Preference: outdoor \nRoberto: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: morning Major: Electrical Technology Location Preference: outdoor \nMark: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: morning Major: Sports, Recreation, & Leisure Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nGeorgene: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: evening Major: Bioengineering Location Preference: outdoor \n\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Smith said: \"Hi, I'm Ethan. Nice to meet you. Are you originally from around here?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hello Ethan, I'm Noah. Not originally, but I've been living here for a while now. Say, did you happen to go to college around here?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Smith said: \"Well, I didn\u2019t go to college here, although I do know a bunch of people from various colleges, both nearby and away. They majored in a wide array of disciplines from Greek to Bioengineering. Gotta say, it's enjoyable talking to them about their experiences. How about you? What was your major in college?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I majored in Physical Education since I always had an affinity for sports. It's funny that you mentioned Greek as one of the majors. I have a few friends who studied that in college. Do you happen to know a Janet or a Thanh?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Smith said: \"That's cool, Noah, Physical Education sounds like a challenging but fun path. And, funny you should mention Thanh, I happen to know a Thanh myself. He studied Greek at Williams College and preferred outdoor activities in the afternoon. Perhaps it's the same person you know?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Wow, it's certainly a small world, Ethan! That's the exact same Thanh I know, really great guy with a sharp mind. By any chance, do you also happen to know someone who majored in Conflict Resolution Studies? I've got a couple of friends who studied that, Brenda and Anthony, each at different colleges.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Smith said: \"Hmm, Conflict Resolution Studies, that sounds fascinating. However, I don't think I know a Brenda or Anthony who studied that. Most of the friends I made during my college years were from within my immediate major or those I encountered through shared hobbies and interests.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"No worries, Ethan. Talking about shared hobbies and interests, I've come across quite a few interesting characters within different friend circles. By the way, do you know any Arts and Crafts enthusiasts? A good friend of mine, Alice, majored in Crafts & Artisanry at Trenton State College. Maybe you've crossed paths?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Smith said: \"Art and Crafts, hey? That's a unique choice of major. I have a friend, Leroy, who studied Greek at Trenton State College. Same college, but I'm not sure if he knows Alice. So, you mentioned sports earlier. Did you enjoy outdoor activities in the evening like my friend Eric?\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"I actually do enjoy the outdoors, but I'm mostly an afternoon person. Interestingly, Brenda, the friend I mentioned earlier with a Conflict Resolution Studies background, she's a fan of outdoor activities in the evening. Seems like Eric and Brenda might have a thing or two in common. Eric, was he from Trenton State College too?\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Smith said: \"No, Eric actually went to San Jose State University. Like you and Brenda, he also enjoys outdoor activities, although he prefers the evening. It's quite fascinating how we all have overlapping interests and paths, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. It's the crossover of interests and paths that makes social interactions so rich. By the way, are you familiar with folks from Williams College? I had a couple of friends, Thomas and James who went there. Both loved afternoon activities. Thomas studied Asian Languages, while James was into Materials Engineering.\"\n\nTurn #12: Ethan Smith said: \"Yes, I do know people from Williams College. I have friends who studied a variety of majors there and enjoyed outdoor activities at different times of the day. For instance, Debra studied Psychology and liked outdoor activities in the afternoon. Though, I can't say I know a Thomas or James. It is indeed fascinating how our worlds collide and intersect in unexpected ways.\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, Ethan, it's incredible to see the unexpected connections and commonalities we share. I have thoroughly enjoyed our conversation. Speaking of which, I have a friend named Robert who attended Rutgers University. He was into Protestant Affiliation and preferred indoor activities in the morning. It seems like a rare major. Does it sound familiar to you?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Rutgers University, that's a well-known institution indeed. Protestant Affiliation seems to be a rather niche major. I don't think I know anyone myself who studied that. I do have a buddy named Roberto who went to the University of Arkansas - Fayetteville, majored in Electrical Technology. His preference was also indoor activities but unlike Robert, Roberto was more of a morning person. These connections make for interesting conversations, don't they?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Ethan Smith and Noah Davis\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nNoah Davis's background: \nEthan Smith's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nElizabeth: School: Eastern Nazarene College Time Preference: morning Major: Social Science Education Location Preference: outdoor \nEric: School: San Jose State University Time Preference: evening Major: Geological Engineering Location Preference: outdoor \nLeroy: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nThanh: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nMarva: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Bioengineering Location Preference: outdoor \nMichael: School: Williams College Time Preference: morning Major: Marine Biology Location Preference: outdoor \nVirginia: School: Williams College Time Preference: evening Major: Applied Mathematics Location Preference: outdoor \nDebra: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Psychology Location Preference: outdoor \nEugenia: School: Stephens College Time Preference: morning Major: Psychology Location Preference: outdoor \nRoberto: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: morning Major: Electrical Technology Location Preference: outdoor \nMark: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: morning Major: Sports, Recreation, & Leisure Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nGeorgene: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: evening Major: Bioengineering Location Preference: outdoor \n\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Smith said: \"Hi, I'm Ethan. Nice to meet you. Are you originally from around here?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hello Ethan, I'm Noah. Not originally, but I've been living here for a while now. Say, did you happen to go to college around here?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Smith said: \"Well, I didn\u2019t go to college here, although I do know a bunch of people from various colleges, both nearby and away. They majored in a wide array of disciplines from Greek to Bioengineering. Gotta say, it's enjoyable talking to them about their experiences. How about you? What was your major in college?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I majored in Physical Education since I always had an affinity for sports. It's funny that you mentioned Greek as one of the majors. I have a few friends who studied that in college. Do you happen to know a Janet or a Thanh?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Smith said: \"That's cool, Noah, Physical Education sounds like a challenging but fun path. And, funny you should mention Thanh, I happen to know a Thanh myself. He studied Greek at Williams College and preferred outdoor activities in the afternoon. Perhaps it's the same person you know?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Wow, it's certainly a small world, Ethan! That's the exact same Thanh I know, really great guy with a sharp mind. By any chance, do you also happen to know someone who majored in Conflict Resolution Studies? I've got a couple of friends who studied that, Brenda and Anthony, each at different colleges.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Smith said: \"Hmm, Conflict Resolution Studies, that sounds fascinating. However, I don't think I know a Brenda or Anthony who studied that. Most of the friends I made during my college years were from within my immediate major or those I encountered through shared hobbies and interests.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"No worries, Ethan. Talking about shared hobbies and interests, I've come across quite a few interesting characters within different friend circles. By the way, do you know any Arts and Crafts enthusiasts? A good friend of mine, Alice, majored in Crafts & Artisanry at Trenton State College. Maybe you've crossed paths?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Smith said: \"Art and Crafts, hey? That's a unique choice of major. I have a friend, Leroy, who studied Greek at Trenton State College. Same college, but I'm not sure if he knows Alice. So, you mentioned sports earlier. Did you enjoy outdoor activities in the evening like my friend Eric?\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"I actually do enjoy the outdoors, but I'm mostly an afternoon person. Interestingly, Brenda, the friend I mentioned earlier with a Conflict Resolution Studies background, she's a fan of outdoor activities in the evening. Seems like Eric and Brenda might have a thing or two in common. Eric, was he from Trenton State College too?\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Smith said: \"No, Eric actually went to San Jose State University. Like you and Brenda, he also enjoys outdoor activities, although he prefers the evening. It's quite fascinating how we all have overlapping interests and paths, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. It's the crossover of interests and paths that makes social interactions so rich. By the way, are you familiar with folks from Williams College? I had a couple of friends, Thomas and James who went there. Both loved afternoon activities. Thomas studied Asian Languages, while James was into Materials Engineering.\"\n\nTurn #12: Ethan Smith said: \"Yes, I do know people from Williams College. I have friends who studied a variety of majors there and enjoyed outdoor activities at different times of the day. For instance, Debra studied Psychology and liked outdoor activities in the afternoon. Though, I can't say I know a Thomas or James. It is indeed fascinating how our worlds collide and intersect in unexpected ways.\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, Ethan, it's incredible to see the unexpected connections and commonalities we share. I have thoroughly enjoyed our conversation. Speaking of which, I have a friend named Robert who attended Rutgers University. He was into Protestant Affiliation and preferred indoor activities in the morning. It seems like a rare major. Does it sound familiar to you?\"\n\nTurn #14: Ethan Smith said: \"Rutgers University, that's a well-known institution indeed. Protestant Affiliation seems to be a rather niche major. I don't think I know anyone myself who studied that. I do have a buddy named Roberto who went to the University of Arkansas - Fayetteville, majored in Electrical Technology. His preference was also indoor activities but unlike Robert, Roberto was more of a morning person. These connections make for interesting conversations, don't they?\"\n\nTurn #15: Noah Davis said: \"That's quite amusing, Ethan! Electrical Technology reminds me of my friend Kristen who studied the same major at Oberlin College. And like Roberto, she was more of an evening person. With these countless overlaps, I'm sure we'll come across a mutual friend soon enough. These truly are the times when you realize what a small world we live in!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Your friend Kristen sounds quite interesting, Noah. Electrical Technology is indeed a fascinating field. You're right, with these overlaps, it wouldn't surprise me to find we have a mutual connection. Isn't it captivating how everyone's lives intertwine in some way or another?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Ethan Smith and Noah Davis\nEthan Smith's background: \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nThanh: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nVance: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Vocational Education Location Preference: outdoor \nBrenda: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: evening Major: Conflict Resolution Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nAlice: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Crafts & Artisanry Location Preference: indoor \nThomas: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Asian Languages Location Preference: indoor \nJanet: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Greek Location Preference: indoor \nRobert: School: Rutgers University, Newark Time Preference: morning Major: Protestant Affiliation Location Preference: indoor \nAnthony: School: Oberlin College Time Preference: morning Major: Conflict Resolution Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nElvera: School: Muskingum College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Crafts & Artisanry Location Preference: outdoor \nJames: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Materials Engineering Location Preference: outdoor \nEdgar: School: Muskingum College Time Preference: morning Major: Conflict Resolution Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nKristen: School: Oberlin College Time Preference: evening Major: Electrical Technology Location Preference: indoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Smith said: \"Hi, I'm Ethan. Nice to meet you. Are you originally from around here?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hello Ethan, I'm Noah. Not originally, but I've been living here for a while now. Say, did you happen to go to college around here?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Ethan Smith, your task is to act/speak as Ethan Smith would, keeping in mind Ethan Smith's social goal.\nYou can find Ethan Smith's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Ethan Smith's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Ethan Smith's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Ethan Smith and Noah Davis\nEthan Smith's background: Ethan Smith is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Ethan enjoys reading about new technological advancements and watching documentaries. Personality and values description: Ethan Smith is a reserved, independent thinker. Holding universalism and fairness near, he ponders deeply before making decisions. Ethan's secrets: Secretly donates to charities for underprivileged children\nNoah Davis's background: \nEthan Smith's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nElizabeth: School: Eastern Nazarene College Time Preference: morning Major: Social Science Education Location Preference: outdoor \nEric: School: San Jose State University Time Preference: evening Major: Geological Engineering Location Preference: outdoor \nLeroy: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nThanh: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nMarva: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Bioengineering Location Preference: outdoor \nMichael: School: Williams College Time Preference: morning Major: Marine Biology Location Preference: outdoor \nVirginia: School: Williams College Time Preference: evening Major: Applied Mathematics Location Preference: outdoor \nDebra: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Psychology Location Preference: outdoor \nEugenia: School: Stephens College Time Preference: morning Major: Psychology Location Preference: outdoor \nRoberto: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: morning Major: Electrical Technology Location Preference: outdoor \nMark: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: morning Major: Sports, Recreation, & Leisure Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nGeorgene: School: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville Time Preference: evening Major: Bioengineering Location Preference: outdoor \n\nNoah Davis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Smith said: \"Hi, I'm Ethan. Nice to meet you. Are you originally from around here?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hello Ethan, I'm Noah. Not originally, but I've been living here for a while now. Say, did you happen to go to college around here?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Smith said: \"Well, I didn\u2019t go to college here, although I do know a bunch of people from various colleges, both nearby and away. They majored in a wide array of disciplines from Greek to Bioengineering. Gotta say, it's enjoyable talking to them about their experiences. How about you? What was your major in college?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I majored in Physical Education since I always had an affinity for sports. It's funny that you mentioned Greek as one of the majors. I have a few friends who studied that in college. Do you happen to know a Janet or a Thanh?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Smith said: \"That's cool, Noah, Physical Education sounds like a challenging but fun path. And, funny you should mention Thanh, I happen to know a Thanh myself. He studied Greek at Williams College and preferred outdoor activities in the afternoon. Perhaps it's the same person you know?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Wow, it's certainly a small world, Ethan! That's the exact same Thanh I know, really great guy with a sharp mind. By any chance, do you also happen to know someone who majored in Conflict Resolution Studies? I've got a couple of friends who studied that, Brenda and Anthony, each at different colleges.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Smith said: \"Hmm, Conflict Resolution Studies, that sounds fascinating. However, I don't think I know a Brenda or Anthony who studied that. Most of the friends I made during my college years were from within my immediate major or those I encountered through shared hobbies and interests.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"No worries, Ethan. Talking about shared hobbies and interests, I've come across quite a few interesting characters within different friend circles. By the way, do you know any Arts and Crafts enthusiasts? A good friend of mine, Alice, majored in Crafts & Artisanry at Trenton State College. Maybe you've crossed paths?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Smith said: \"Art and Crafts, hey? That's a unique choice of major. I have a friend, Leroy, who studied Greek at Trenton State College. Same college, but I'm not sure if he knows Alice. So, you mentioned sports earlier. Did you enjoy outdoor activities in the evening like my friend Eric?\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"I actually do enjoy the outdoors, but I'm mostly an afternoon person. Interestingly, Brenda, the friend I mentioned earlier with a Conflict Resolution Studies background, she's a fan of outdoor activities in the evening. Seems like Eric and Brenda might have a thing or two in common. Eric, was he from Trenton State College too?\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Smith said: \"No, Eric actually went to San Jose State University. Like you and Brenda, he also enjoys outdoor activities, although he prefers the evening. It's quite fascinating how we all have overlapping interests and paths, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. It's the crossover of interests and paths that makes social interactions so rich. By the way, are you familiar with folks from Williams College? I had a couple of friends, Thomas and James who went there. Both loved afternoon activities. Thomas studied Asian Languages, while James was into Materials Engineering.\"\n\nTurn #12: Ethan Smith said: \"Yes, I do know people from Williams College. I have friends who studied a variety of majors there and enjoyed outdoor activities at different times of the day. For instance, Debra studied Psychology and liked outdoor activities in the afternoon. Though, I can't say I know a Thomas or James. It is indeed fascinating how our worlds collide and intersect in unexpected ways.\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, Ethan, it's incredible to see the unexpected connections and commonalities we share. I have thoroughly enjoyed our conversation. Speaking of which, I have a friend named Robert who attended Rutgers University. He was into Protestant Affiliation and preferred indoor activities in the morning. It seems like a rare major. Does it sound familiar to you?\"\n\nTurn #14: Ethan Smith said: \"Rutgers University, that's a well-known institution indeed. Protestant Affiliation seems to be a rather niche major. I don't think I know anyone myself who studied that. I do have a buddy named Roberto who went to the University of Arkansas - Fayetteville, majored in Electrical Technology. His preference was also indoor activities but unlike Robert, Roberto was more of a morning person. These connections make for interesting conversations, don't they?\"\n\nTurn #15: Noah Davis said: \"That's quite amusing, Ethan! Electrical Technology reminds me of my friend Kristen who studied the same major at Oberlin College. And like Roberto, she was more of an evening person. With these countless overlaps, I'm sure we'll come across a mutual friend soon enough. These truly are the times when you realize what a small world we live in!\"\n\nTurn #16: Ethan Smith said: \"Your friend Kristen sounds quite interesting, Noah. Electrical Technology is indeed a fascinating field. You're right, with these overlaps, it wouldn't surprise me to find we have a mutual connection. Isn't it captivating how everyone's lives intertwine in some way or another?\"\n\nTurn #17: Noah Davis said: \"Completely agree with you, Ethan. This intertwining of life paths is what makes every interaction unique and interesting. By the way, do you know anyone from Muskingum College? I have two friends, Edgar and Elvera, who studied there. Edgar majored in Conflict Resolution Studies and preferred outdoor activities in the morning, while Elvera was into Crafts & Artisanry and she liked spending her afternoons outdoors.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #18. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Muskingum College, you say? I don't think I know anyone from there. But it's interesting how college topics can lead us to meet so many different individuals with diverse interests and majors. Sports, Greek, BioEngineering, and even Electrical Technology - it's like a vast network of knowledge and skills across various fields. And it's fascinating to see how paths cross, interests overlap, and how seemingly unrelated connections can lead to mutual friendships.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Ethan Smith and Noah Davis\nEthan Smith's background: \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nThanh: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nVance: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Vocational Education Location Preference: outdoor \nBrenda: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: evening Major: Conflict Resolution Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nAlice: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Crafts & Artisanry Location Preference: indoor \nThomas: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Asian Languages Location Preference: indoor \nJanet: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Greek Location Preference: indoor \nRobert: School: Rutgers University, Newark Time Preference: morning Major: Protestant Affiliation Location Preference: indoor \nAnthony: School: Oberlin College Time Preference: morning Major: Conflict Resolution Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nElvera: School: Muskingum College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Crafts & Artisanry Location Preference: outdoor \nJames: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Materials Engineering Location Preference: outdoor \nEdgar: School: Muskingum College Time Preference: morning Major: Conflict Resolution Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nKristen: School: Oberlin College Time Preference: evening Major: Electrical Technology Location Preference: indoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Smith said: \"Hi, I'm Ethan. Nice to meet you. Are you originally from around here?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hello Ethan, I'm Noah. Not originally, but I've been living here for a while now. Say, did you happen to go to college around here?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Smith said: \"Well, I didn\u2019t go to college here, although I do know a bunch of people from various colleges, both nearby and away. They majored in a wide array of disciplines from Greek to Bioengineering. Gotta say, it's enjoyable talking to them about their experiences. How about you? What was your major in college?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I majored in Physical Education since I always had an affinity for sports. It's funny that you mentioned Greek as one of the majors. I have a few friends who studied that in college. Do you happen to know a Janet or a Thanh?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Ethan Smith and Noah Davis\nEthan Smith's background: \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nThanh: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nVance: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Vocational Education Location Preference: outdoor \nBrenda: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: evening Major: Conflict Resolution Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nAlice: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Crafts & Artisanry Location Preference: indoor \nThomas: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Asian Languages Location Preference: indoor \nJanet: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Greek Location Preference: indoor \nRobert: School: Rutgers University, Newark Time Preference: morning Major: Protestant Affiliation Location Preference: indoor \nAnthony: School: Oberlin College Time Preference: morning Major: Conflict Resolution Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nElvera: School: Muskingum College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Crafts & Artisanry Location Preference: outdoor \nJames: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Materials Engineering Location Preference: outdoor \nEdgar: School: Muskingum College Time Preference: morning Major: Conflict Resolution Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nKristen: School: Oberlin College Time Preference: evening Major: Electrical Technology Location Preference: indoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Smith said: \"Hi, I'm Ethan. Nice to meet you. Are you originally from around here?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hello Ethan, I'm Noah. Not originally, but I've been living here for a while now. Say, did you happen to go to college around here?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Smith said: \"Well, I didn\u2019t go to college here, although I do know a bunch of people from various colleges, both nearby and away. They majored in a wide array of disciplines from Greek to Bioengineering. Gotta say, it's enjoyable talking to them about their experiences. How about you? What was your major in college?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I majored in Physical Education since I always had an affinity for sports. It's funny that you mentioned Greek as one of the majors. I have a few friends who studied that in college. Do you happen to know a Janet or a Thanh?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Smith said: \"That's cool, Noah, Physical Education sounds like a challenging but fun path. And, funny you should mention Thanh, I happen to know a Thanh myself. He studied Greek at Williams College and preferred outdoor activities in the afternoon. Perhaps it's the same person you know?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Wow, it's certainly a small world, Ethan! That's the exact same Thanh I know, really great guy with a sharp mind. By any chance, do you also happen to know someone who majored in Conflict Resolution Studies? I've got a couple of friends who studied that, Brenda and Anthony, each at different colleges.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Smith said: \"Hmm, Conflict Resolution Studies, that sounds fascinating. However, I don't think I know a Brenda or Anthony who studied that. Most of the friends I made during my college years were from within my immediate major or those I encountered through shared hobbies and interests.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"No worries, Ethan. Talking about shared hobbies and interests, I've come across quite a few interesting characters within different friend circles. By the way, do you know any Arts and Crafts enthusiasts? A good friend of mine, Alice, majored in Crafts & Artisanry at Trenton State College. Maybe you've crossed paths?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Smith said: \"Art and Crafts, hey? That's a unique choice of major. I have a friend, Leroy, who studied Greek at Trenton State College. Same college, but I'm not sure if he knows Alice. So, you mentioned sports earlier. Did you enjoy outdoor activities in the evening like my friend Eric?\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"I actually do enjoy the outdoors, but I'm mostly an afternoon person. Interestingly, Brenda, the friend I mentioned earlier with a Conflict Resolution Studies background, she's a fan of outdoor activities in the evening. Seems like Eric and Brenda might have a thing or two in common. Eric, was he from Trenton State College too?\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Smith said: \"No, Eric actually went to San Jose State University. Like you and Brenda, he also enjoys outdoor activities, although he prefers the evening. It's quite fascinating how we all have overlapping interests and paths, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. It's the crossover of interests and paths that makes social interactions so rich. By the way, are you familiar with folks from Williams College? I had a couple of friends, Thomas and James who went there. Both loved afternoon activities. Thomas studied Asian Languages, while James was into Materials Engineering.\"\n\nTurn #12: Ethan Smith said: \"Yes, I do know people from Williams College. I have friends who studied a variety of majors there and enjoyed outdoor activities at different times of the day. For instance, Debra studied Psychology and liked outdoor activities in the afternoon. Though, I can't say I know a Thomas or James. It is indeed fascinating how our worlds collide and intersect in unexpected ways.\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, Ethan, it's incredible to see the unexpected connections and commonalities we share. I have thoroughly enjoyed our conversation. Speaking of which, I have a friend named Robert who attended Rutgers University. He was into Protestant Affiliation and preferred indoor activities in the morning. It seems like a rare major. Does it sound familiar to you?\"\n\nTurn #14: Ethan Smith said: \"Rutgers University, that's a well-known institution indeed. Protestant Affiliation seems to be a rather niche major. I don't think I know anyone myself who studied that. I do have a buddy named Roberto who went to the University of Arkansas - Fayetteville, majored in Electrical Technology. His preference was also indoor activities but unlike Robert, Roberto was more of a morning person. These connections make for interesting conversations, don't they?\"\n\nTurn #15: Noah Davis said: \"That's quite amusing, Ethan! Electrical Technology reminds me of my friend Kristen who studied the same major at Oberlin College. And like Roberto, she was more of an evening person. With these countless overlaps, I'm sure we'll come across a mutual friend soon enough. These truly are the times when you realize what a small world we live in!\"\n\nTurn #16: Ethan Smith said: \"Your friend Kristen sounds quite interesting, Noah. Electrical Technology is indeed a fascinating field. You're right, with these overlaps, it wouldn't surprise me to find we have a mutual connection. Isn't it captivating how everyone's lives intertwine in some way or another?\"\n\nTurn #17: Noah Davis said: \"Completely agree with you, Ethan. This intertwining of life paths is what makes every interaction unique and interesting. By the way, do you know anyone from Muskingum College? I have two friends, Edgar and Elvera, who studied there. Edgar majored in Conflict Resolution Studies and preferred outdoor activities in the morning, while Elvera was into Crafts & Artisanry and she liked spending her afternoons outdoors.\"\n\nTurn #18: Ethan Smith said: \"Muskingum College, you say? I don't think I know anyone from there. But it's interesting how college topics can lead us to meet so many different individuals with diverse interests and majors. Sports, Greek, BioEngineering, and even Electrical Technology - it's like a vast network of knowledge and skills across various fields. And it's fascinating to see how paths cross, interests overlap, and how seemingly unrelated connections can lead to mutual friendships.\"\n\nTurn #19: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. It's all these unique and diverse connections that truly enrich our life experiences. By the way, ever encounter someone fascinating from Oberlin College? I remembered Anthony, an incredible friend of mine who made an impression on everyone. He was majoring in Conflict Resolution Studies and preferred outdoor activities in the morning. Quite unique, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #20: Ethan Smith said: \"Conflict Resolution Studies continues to impress me as a major, Noah. I don't believe I know an Anthony from Oberlin College, but I find those majoring in such a field could lead to meaningful and important discussions. It does cast my mind back to my friend Eric from San Jose State University again, who, like Anthony, also prefers outdoor activities but in the evening. There's a correlation between diverse interests and personal choices leading to these interconnections, wouldn't you agree?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #21. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Ethan Smith and Noah Davis\nEthan Smith's background: \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nThanh: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nVance: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Vocational Education Location Preference: outdoor \nBrenda: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: evening Major: Conflict Resolution Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nAlice: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Crafts & Artisanry Location Preference: indoor \nThomas: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Asian Languages Location Preference: indoor \nJanet: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Greek Location Preference: indoor \nRobert: School: Rutgers University, Newark Time Preference: morning Major: Protestant Affiliation Location Preference: indoor \nAnthony: School: Oberlin College Time Preference: morning Major: Conflict Resolution Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nElvera: School: Muskingum College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Crafts & Artisanry Location Preference: outdoor \nJames: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Materials Engineering Location Preference: outdoor \nEdgar: School: Muskingum College Time Preference: morning Major: Conflict Resolution Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nKristen: School: Oberlin College Time Preference: evening Major: Electrical Technology Location Preference: indoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Smith said: \"Hi, I'm Ethan. Nice to meet you. Are you originally from around here?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hello Ethan, I'm Noah. Not originally, but I've been living here for a while now. Say, did you happen to go to college around here?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Smith said: \"Well, I didn\u2019t go to college here, although I do know a bunch of people from various colleges, both nearby and away. They majored in a wide array of disciplines from Greek to Bioengineering. Gotta say, it's enjoyable talking to them about their experiences. How about you? What was your major in college?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I majored in Physical Education since I always had an affinity for sports. It's funny that you mentioned Greek as one of the majors. I have a few friends who studied that in college. Do you happen to know a Janet or a Thanh?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Smith said: \"That's cool, Noah, Physical Education sounds like a challenging but fun path. And, funny you should mention Thanh, I happen to know a Thanh myself. He studied Greek at Williams College and preferred outdoor activities in the afternoon. Perhaps it's the same person you know?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Wow, it's certainly a small world, Ethan! That's the exact same Thanh I know, really great guy with a sharp mind. By any chance, do you also happen to know someone who majored in Conflict Resolution Studies? I've got a couple of friends who studied that, Brenda and Anthony, each at different colleges.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Ethan Smith and Noah Davis\nEthan Smith's background: \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nThanh: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nVance: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Vocational Education Location Preference: outdoor \nBrenda: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: evening Major: Conflict Resolution Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nAlice: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Crafts & Artisanry Location Preference: indoor \nThomas: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Asian Languages Location Preference: indoor \nJanet: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Greek Location Preference: indoor \nRobert: School: Rutgers University, Newark Time Preference: morning Major: Protestant Affiliation Location Preference: indoor \nAnthony: School: Oberlin College Time Preference: morning Major: Conflict Resolution Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nElvera: School: Muskingum College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Crafts & Artisanry Location Preference: outdoor \nJames: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Materials Engineering Location Preference: outdoor \nEdgar: School: Muskingum College Time Preference: morning Major: Conflict Resolution Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nKristen: School: Oberlin College Time Preference: evening Major: Electrical Technology Location Preference: indoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Smith said: \"Hi, I'm Ethan. Nice to meet you. Are you originally from around here?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hello Ethan, I'm Noah. Not originally, but I've been living here for a while now. Say, did you happen to go to college around here?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Smith said: \"Well, I didn\u2019t go to college here, although I do know a bunch of people from various colleges, both nearby and away. They majored in a wide array of disciplines from Greek to Bioengineering. Gotta say, it's enjoyable talking to them about their experiences. How about you? What was your major in college?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I majored in Physical Education since I always had an affinity for sports. It's funny that you mentioned Greek as one of the majors. I have a few friends who studied that in college. Do you happen to know a Janet or a Thanh?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Smith said: \"That's cool, Noah, Physical Education sounds like a challenging but fun path. And, funny you should mention Thanh, I happen to know a Thanh myself. He studied Greek at Williams College and preferred outdoor activities in the afternoon. Perhaps it's the same person you know?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Wow, it's certainly a small world, Ethan! That's the exact same Thanh I know, really great guy with a sharp mind. By any chance, do you also happen to know someone who majored in Conflict Resolution Studies? I've got a couple of friends who studied that, Brenda and Anthony, each at different colleges.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Smith said: \"Hmm, Conflict Resolution Studies, that sounds fascinating. However, I don't think I know a Brenda or Anthony who studied that. Most of the friends I made during my college years were from within my immediate major or those I encountered through shared hobbies and interests.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"No worries, Ethan. Talking about shared hobbies and interests, I've come across quite a few interesting characters within different friend circles. By the way, do you know any Arts and Crafts enthusiasts? A good friend of mine, Alice, majored in Crafts & Artisanry at Trenton State College. Maybe you've crossed paths?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Ethan Smith and Noah Davis\nEthan Smith's background: \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nThanh: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nVance: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Vocational Education Location Preference: outdoor \nBrenda: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: evening Major: Conflict Resolution Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nAlice: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Crafts & Artisanry Location Preference: indoor \nThomas: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Asian Languages Location Preference: indoor \nJanet: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Greek Location Preference: indoor \nRobert: School: Rutgers University, Newark Time Preference: morning Major: Protestant Affiliation Location Preference: indoor \nAnthony: School: Oberlin College Time Preference: morning Major: Conflict Resolution Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nElvera: School: Muskingum College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Crafts & Artisanry Location Preference: outdoor \nJames: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Materials Engineering Location Preference: outdoor \nEdgar: School: Muskingum College Time Preference: morning Major: Conflict Resolution Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nKristen: School: Oberlin College Time Preference: evening Major: Electrical Technology Location Preference: indoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Smith said: \"Hi, I'm Ethan. Nice to meet you. Are you originally from around here?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hello Ethan, I'm Noah. Not originally, but I've been living here for a while now. Say, did you happen to go to college around here?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Smith said: \"Well, I didn\u2019t go to college here, although I do know a bunch of people from various colleges, both nearby and away. They majored in a wide array of disciplines from Greek to Bioengineering. Gotta say, it's enjoyable talking to them about their experiences. How about you? What was your major in college?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I majored in Physical Education since I always had an affinity for sports. It's funny that you mentioned Greek as one of the majors. I have a few friends who studied that in college. Do you happen to know a Janet or a Thanh?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Smith said: \"That's cool, Noah, Physical Education sounds like a challenging but fun path. And, funny you should mention Thanh, I happen to know a Thanh myself. He studied Greek at Williams College and preferred outdoor activities in the afternoon. Perhaps it's the same person you know?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Wow, it's certainly a small world, Ethan! That's the exact same Thanh I know, really great guy with a sharp mind. By any chance, do you also happen to know someone who majored in Conflict Resolution Studies? I've got a couple of friends who studied that, Brenda and Anthony, each at different colleges.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Smith said: \"Hmm, Conflict Resolution Studies, that sounds fascinating. However, I don't think I know a Brenda or Anthony who studied that. Most of the friends I made during my college years were from within my immediate major or those I encountered through shared hobbies and interests.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"No worries, Ethan. Talking about shared hobbies and interests, I've come across quite a few interesting characters within different friend circles. By the way, do you know any Arts and Crafts enthusiasts? A good friend of mine, Alice, majored in Crafts & Artisanry at Trenton State College. Maybe you've crossed paths?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Smith said: \"Art and Crafts, hey? That's a unique choice of major. I have a friend, Leroy, who studied Greek at Trenton State College. Same college, but I'm not sure if he knows Alice. So, you mentioned sports earlier. Did you enjoy outdoor activities in the evening like my friend Eric?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I actually do enjoy the outdoors, but I'm mostly an afternoon person. Interestingly, Brenda, the friend I mentioned earlier with a Conflict Resolution Studies background, she's a fan of outdoor activities in the evening. Seems like Eric and Brenda might have a thing or two in common. Eric, was he from Trenton State College too?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Ethan Smith and Noah Davis\nEthan Smith's background: \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nThanh: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nVance: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Vocational Education Location Preference: outdoor \nBrenda: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: evening Major: Conflict Resolution Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nAlice: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Crafts & Artisanry Location Preference: indoor \nThomas: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Asian Languages Location Preference: indoor \nJanet: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Greek Location Preference: indoor \nRobert: School: Rutgers University, Newark Time Preference: morning Major: Protestant Affiliation Location Preference: indoor \nAnthony: School: Oberlin College Time Preference: morning Major: Conflict Resolution Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nElvera: School: Muskingum College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Crafts & Artisanry Location Preference: outdoor \nJames: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Materials Engineering Location Preference: outdoor \nEdgar: School: Muskingum College Time Preference: morning Major: Conflict Resolution Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nKristen: School: Oberlin College Time Preference: evening Major: Electrical Technology Location Preference: indoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Smith said: \"Hi, I'm Ethan. Nice to meet you. Are you originally from around here?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hello Ethan, I'm Noah. Not originally, but I've been living here for a while now. Say, did you happen to go to college around here?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Smith said: \"Well, I didn\u2019t go to college here, although I do know a bunch of people from various colleges, both nearby and away. They majored in a wide array of disciplines from Greek to Bioengineering. Gotta say, it's enjoyable talking to them about their experiences. How about you? What was your major in college?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I majored in Physical Education since I always had an affinity for sports. It's funny that you mentioned Greek as one of the majors. I have a few friends who studied that in college. Do you happen to know a Janet or a Thanh?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Smith said: \"That's cool, Noah, Physical Education sounds like a challenging but fun path. And, funny you should mention Thanh, I happen to know a Thanh myself. He studied Greek at Williams College and preferred outdoor activities in the afternoon. Perhaps it's the same person you know?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Wow, it's certainly a small world, Ethan! That's the exact same Thanh I know, really great guy with a sharp mind. By any chance, do you also happen to know someone who majored in Conflict Resolution Studies? I've got a couple of friends who studied that, Brenda and Anthony, each at different colleges.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Smith said: \"Hmm, Conflict Resolution Studies, that sounds fascinating. However, I don't think I know a Brenda or Anthony who studied that. Most of the friends I made during my college years were from within my immediate major or those I encountered through shared hobbies and interests.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"No worries, Ethan. Talking about shared hobbies and interests, I've come across quite a few interesting characters within different friend circles. By the way, do you know any Arts and Crafts enthusiasts? A good friend of mine, Alice, majored in Crafts & Artisanry at Trenton State College. Maybe you've crossed paths?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Smith said: \"Art and Crafts, hey? That's a unique choice of major. I have a friend, Leroy, who studied Greek at Trenton State College. Same college, but I'm not sure if he knows Alice. So, you mentioned sports earlier. Did you enjoy outdoor activities in the evening like my friend Eric?\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"I actually do enjoy the outdoors, but I'm mostly an afternoon person. Interestingly, Brenda, the friend I mentioned earlier with a Conflict Resolution Studies background, she's a fan of outdoor activities in the evening. Seems like Eric and Brenda might have a thing or two in common. Eric, was he from Trenton State College too?\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Smith said: \"No, Eric actually went to San Jose State University. Like you and Brenda, he also enjoys outdoor activities, although he prefers the evening. It's quite fascinating how we all have overlapping interests and paths, isn't it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Ethan. It's the crossover of interests and paths that makes social interactions so rich. By the way, are you familiar with folks from Williams College? I had a couple of friends, Thomas and James who went there. Both loved afternoon activities. Thomas studied Asian Languages, while James was into Materials Engineering.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Ethan Smith and Noah Davis\nEthan Smith's background: \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nThanh: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nVance: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Vocational Education Location Preference: outdoor \nBrenda: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: evening Major: Conflict Resolution Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nAlice: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Crafts & Artisanry Location Preference: indoor \nThomas: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Asian Languages Location Preference: indoor \nJanet: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Greek Location Preference: indoor \nRobert: School: Rutgers University, Newark Time Preference: morning Major: Protestant Affiliation Location Preference: indoor \nAnthony: School: Oberlin College Time Preference: morning Major: Conflict Resolution Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nElvera: School: Muskingum College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Crafts & Artisanry Location Preference: outdoor \nJames: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Materials Engineering Location Preference: outdoor \nEdgar: School: Muskingum College Time Preference: morning Major: Conflict Resolution Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nKristen: School: Oberlin College Time Preference: evening Major: Electrical Technology Location Preference: indoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Smith said: \"Hi, I'm Ethan. Nice to meet you. Are you originally from around here?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hello Ethan, I'm Noah. Not originally, but I've been living here for a while now. Say, did you happen to go to college around here?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Smith said: \"Well, I didn\u2019t go to college here, although I do know a bunch of people from various colleges, both nearby and away. They majored in a wide array of disciplines from Greek to Bioengineering. Gotta say, it's enjoyable talking to them about their experiences. How about you? What was your major in college?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I majored in Physical Education since I always had an affinity for sports. It's funny that you mentioned Greek as one of the majors. I have a few friends who studied that in college. Do you happen to know a Janet or a Thanh?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Smith said: \"That's cool, Noah, Physical Education sounds like a challenging but fun path. And, funny you should mention Thanh, I happen to know a Thanh myself. He studied Greek at Williams College and preferred outdoor activities in the afternoon. Perhaps it's the same person you know?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Wow, it's certainly a small world, Ethan! That's the exact same Thanh I know, really great guy with a sharp mind. By any chance, do you also happen to know someone who majored in Conflict Resolution Studies? I've got a couple of friends who studied that, Brenda and Anthony, each at different colleges.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Smith said: \"Hmm, Conflict Resolution Studies, that sounds fascinating. However, I don't think I know a Brenda or Anthony who studied that. Most of the friends I made during my college years were from within my immediate major or those I encountered through shared hobbies and interests.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"No worries, Ethan. Talking about shared hobbies and interests, I've come across quite a few interesting characters within different friend circles. By the way, do you know any Arts and Crafts enthusiasts? A good friend of mine, Alice, majored in Crafts & Artisanry at Trenton State College. Maybe you've crossed paths?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Smith said: \"Art and Crafts, hey? That's a unique choice of major. I have a friend, Leroy, who studied Greek at Trenton State College. Same college, but I'm not sure if he knows Alice. So, you mentioned sports earlier. Did you enjoy outdoor activities in the evening like my friend Eric?\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"I actually do enjoy the outdoors, but I'm mostly an afternoon person. Interestingly, Brenda, the friend I mentioned earlier with a Conflict Resolution Studies background, she's a fan of outdoor activities in the evening. Seems like Eric and Brenda might have a thing or two in common. Eric, was he from Trenton State College too?\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Smith said: \"No, Eric actually went to San Jose State University. Like you and Brenda, he also enjoys outdoor activities, although he prefers the evening. It's quite fascinating how we all have overlapping interests and paths, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. It's the crossover of interests and paths that makes social interactions so rich. By the way, are you familiar with folks from Williams College? I had a couple of friends, Thomas and James who went there. Both loved afternoon activities. Thomas studied Asian Languages, while James was into Materials Engineering.\"\n\nTurn #12: Ethan Smith said: \"Yes, I do know people from Williams College. I have friends who studied a variety of majors there and enjoyed outdoor activities at different times of the day. For instance, Debra studied Psychology and liked outdoor activities in the afternoon. Though, I can't say I know a Thomas or James. It is indeed fascinating how our worlds collide and intersect in unexpected ways.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, Ethan, it's incredible to see the unexpected connections and commonalities we share. I have thoroughly enjoyed our conversation. Speaking of which, I have a friend named Robert who attended Rutgers University. He was into Protestant Affiliation and preferred indoor activities in the morning. It seems like a rare major. Does it sound familiar to you?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Ethan Smith and Noah Davis\nEthan Smith's background: \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nThanh: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nVance: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Vocational Education Location Preference: outdoor \nBrenda: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: evening Major: Conflict Resolution Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nAlice: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Crafts & Artisanry Location Preference: indoor \nThomas: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Asian Languages Location Preference: indoor \nJanet: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Greek Location Preference: indoor \nRobert: School: Rutgers University, Newark Time Preference: morning Major: Protestant Affiliation Location Preference: indoor \nAnthony: School: Oberlin College Time Preference: morning Major: Conflict Resolution Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nElvera: School: Muskingum College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Crafts & Artisanry Location Preference: outdoor \nJames: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Materials Engineering Location Preference: outdoor \nEdgar: School: Muskingum College Time Preference: morning Major: Conflict Resolution Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nKristen: School: Oberlin College Time Preference: evening Major: Electrical Technology Location Preference: indoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Smith said: \"Hi, I'm Ethan. Nice to meet you. Are you originally from around here?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hello Ethan, I'm Noah. Not originally, but I've been living here for a while now. Say, did you happen to go to college around here?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Smith said: \"Well, I didn\u2019t go to college here, although I do know a bunch of people from various colleges, both nearby and away. They majored in a wide array of disciplines from Greek to Bioengineering. Gotta say, it's enjoyable talking to them about their experiences. How about you? What was your major in college?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I majored in Physical Education since I always had an affinity for sports. It's funny that you mentioned Greek as one of the majors. I have a few friends who studied that in college. Do you happen to know a Janet or a Thanh?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Smith said: \"That's cool, Noah, Physical Education sounds like a challenging but fun path. And, funny you should mention Thanh, I happen to know a Thanh myself. He studied Greek at Williams College and preferred outdoor activities in the afternoon. Perhaps it's the same person you know?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Wow, it's certainly a small world, Ethan! That's the exact same Thanh I know, really great guy with a sharp mind. By any chance, do you also happen to know someone who majored in Conflict Resolution Studies? I've got a couple of friends who studied that, Brenda and Anthony, each at different colleges.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Smith said: \"Hmm, Conflict Resolution Studies, that sounds fascinating. However, I don't think I know a Brenda or Anthony who studied that. Most of the friends I made during my college years were from within my immediate major or those I encountered through shared hobbies and interests.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"No worries, Ethan. Talking about shared hobbies and interests, I've come across quite a few interesting characters within different friend circles. By the way, do you know any Arts and Crafts enthusiasts? A good friend of mine, Alice, majored in Crafts & Artisanry at Trenton State College. Maybe you've crossed paths?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Smith said: \"Art and Crafts, hey? That's a unique choice of major. I have a friend, Leroy, who studied Greek at Trenton State College. Same college, but I'm not sure if he knows Alice. So, you mentioned sports earlier. Did you enjoy outdoor activities in the evening like my friend Eric?\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"I actually do enjoy the outdoors, but I'm mostly an afternoon person. Interestingly, Brenda, the friend I mentioned earlier with a Conflict Resolution Studies background, she's a fan of outdoor activities in the evening. Seems like Eric and Brenda might have a thing or two in common. Eric, was he from Trenton State College too?\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Smith said: \"No, Eric actually went to San Jose State University. Like you and Brenda, he also enjoys outdoor activities, although he prefers the evening. It's quite fascinating how we all have overlapping interests and paths, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. It's the crossover of interests and paths that makes social interactions so rich. By the way, are you familiar with folks from Williams College? I had a couple of friends, Thomas and James who went there. Both loved afternoon activities. Thomas studied Asian Languages, while James was into Materials Engineering.\"\n\nTurn #12: Ethan Smith said: \"Yes, I do know people from Williams College. I have friends who studied a variety of majors there and enjoyed outdoor activities at different times of the day. For instance, Debra studied Psychology and liked outdoor activities in the afternoon. Though, I can't say I know a Thomas or James. It is indeed fascinating how our worlds collide and intersect in unexpected ways.\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, Ethan, it's incredible to see the unexpected connections and commonalities we share. I have thoroughly enjoyed our conversation. Speaking of which, I have a friend named Robert who attended Rutgers University. He was into Protestant Affiliation and preferred indoor activities in the morning. It seems like a rare major. Does it sound familiar to you?\"\n\nTurn #14: Ethan Smith said: \"Rutgers University, that's a well-known institution indeed. Protestant Affiliation seems to be a rather niche major. I don't think I know anyone myself who studied that. I do have a buddy named Roberto who went to the University of Arkansas - Fayetteville, majored in Electrical Technology. His preference was also indoor activities but unlike Robert, Roberto was more of a morning person. These connections make for interesting conversations, don't they?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's quite amusing, Ethan! Electrical Technology reminds me of my friend Kristen who studied the same major at Oberlin College. And like Roberto, she was more of an evening person. With these countless overlaps, I'm sure we'll come across a mutual friend soon enough. These truly are the times when you realize what a small world we live in!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Ethan Smith and Noah Davis\nEthan Smith's background: \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nThanh: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nVance: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Vocational Education Location Preference: outdoor \nBrenda: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: evening Major: Conflict Resolution Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nAlice: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Crafts & Artisanry Location Preference: indoor \nThomas: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Asian Languages Location Preference: indoor \nJanet: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Greek Location Preference: indoor \nRobert: School: Rutgers University, Newark Time Preference: morning Major: Protestant Affiliation Location Preference: indoor \nAnthony: School: Oberlin College Time Preference: morning Major: Conflict Resolution Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nElvera: School: Muskingum College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Crafts & Artisanry Location Preference: outdoor \nJames: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Materials Engineering Location Preference: outdoor \nEdgar: School: Muskingum College Time Preference: morning Major: Conflict Resolution Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nKristen: School: Oberlin College Time Preference: evening Major: Electrical Technology Location Preference: indoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Smith said: \"Hi, I'm Ethan. Nice to meet you. Are you originally from around here?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hello Ethan, I'm Noah. Not originally, but I've been living here for a while now. Say, did you happen to go to college around here?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Smith said: \"Well, I didn\u2019t go to college here, although I do know a bunch of people from various colleges, both nearby and away. They majored in a wide array of disciplines from Greek to Bioengineering. Gotta say, it's enjoyable talking to them about their experiences. How about you? What was your major in college?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I majored in Physical Education since I always had an affinity for sports. It's funny that you mentioned Greek as one of the majors. I have a few friends who studied that in college. Do you happen to know a Janet or a Thanh?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Smith said: \"That's cool, Noah, Physical Education sounds like a challenging but fun path. And, funny you should mention Thanh, I happen to know a Thanh myself. He studied Greek at Williams College and preferred outdoor activities in the afternoon. Perhaps it's the same person you know?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Wow, it's certainly a small world, Ethan! That's the exact same Thanh I know, really great guy with a sharp mind. By any chance, do you also happen to know someone who majored in Conflict Resolution Studies? I've got a couple of friends who studied that, Brenda and Anthony, each at different colleges.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Smith said: \"Hmm, Conflict Resolution Studies, that sounds fascinating. However, I don't think I know a Brenda or Anthony who studied that. Most of the friends I made during my college years were from within my immediate major or those I encountered through shared hobbies and interests.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"No worries, Ethan. Talking about shared hobbies and interests, I've come across quite a few interesting characters within different friend circles. By the way, do you know any Arts and Crafts enthusiasts? A good friend of mine, Alice, majored in Crafts & Artisanry at Trenton State College. Maybe you've crossed paths?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Smith said: \"Art and Crafts, hey? That's a unique choice of major. I have a friend, Leroy, who studied Greek at Trenton State College. Same college, but I'm not sure if he knows Alice. So, you mentioned sports earlier. Did you enjoy outdoor activities in the evening like my friend Eric?\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"I actually do enjoy the outdoors, but I'm mostly an afternoon person. Interestingly, Brenda, the friend I mentioned earlier with a Conflict Resolution Studies background, she's a fan of outdoor activities in the evening. Seems like Eric and Brenda might have a thing or two in common. Eric, was he from Trenton State College too?\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Smith said: \"No, Eric actually went to San Jose State University. Like you and Brenda, he also enjoys outdoor activities, although he prefers the evening. It's quite fascinating how we all have overlapping interests and paths, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. It's the crossover of interests and paths that makes social interactions so rich. By the way, are you familiar with folks from Williams College? I had a couple of friends, Thomas and James who went there. Both loved afternoon activities. Thomas studied Asian Languages, while James was into Materials Engineering.\"\n\nTurn #12: Ethan Smith said: \"Yes, I do know people from Williams College. I have friends who studied a variety of majors there and enjoyed outdoor activities at different times of the day. For instance, Debra studied Psychology and liked outdoor activities in the afternoon. Though, I can't say I know a Thomas or James. It is indeed fascinating how our worlds collide and intersect in unexpected ways.\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, Ethan, it's incredible to see the unexpected connections and commonalities we share. I have thoroughly enjoyed our conversation. Speaking of which, I have a friend named Robert who attended Rutgers University. He was into Protestant Affiliation and preferred indoor activities in the morning. It seems like a rare major. Does it sound familiar to you?\"\n\nTurn #14: Ethan Smith said: \"Rutgers University, that's a well-known institution indeed. Protestant Affiliation seems to be a rather niche major. I don't think I know anyone myself who studied that. I do have a buddy named Roberto who went to the University of Arkansas - Fayetteville, majored in Electrical Technology. His preference was also indoor activities but unlike Robert, Roberto was more of a morning person. These connections make for interesting conversations, don't they?\"\n\nTurn #15: Noah Davis said: \"That's quite amusing, Ethan! Electrical Technology reminds me of my friend Kristen who studied the same major at Oberlin College. And like Roberto, she was more of an evening person. With these countless overlaps, I'm sure we'll come across a mutual friend soon enough. These truly are the times when you realize what a small world we live in!\"\n\nTurn #16: Ethan Smith said: \"Your friend Kristen sounds quite interesting, Noah. Electrical Technology is indeed a fascinating field. You're right, with these overlaps, it wouldn't surprise me to find we have a mutual connection. Isn't it captivating how everyone's lives intertwine in some way or another?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Completely agree with you, Ethan. This intertwining of life paths is what makes every interaction unique and interesting. By the way, do you know anyone from Muskingum College? I have two friends, Edgar and Elvera, who studied there. Edgar majored in Conflict Resolution Studies and preferred outdoor activities in the morning, while Elvera was into Crafts & Artisanry and she liked spending her afternoons outdoors.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Noah Davis, your task is to act/speak as Noah Davis would, keeping in mind Noah Davis's social goal.\nYou can find Noah Davis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Noah Davis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Noah Davis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Ethan Smith and Noah Davis\nEthan Smith's background: \nNoah Davis's background: Noah Davis is a 40-year-old male coach. He/him pronouns. Noah Davis has a swimming pool. Personality and values description: Noah Davis, who is somewhat reserved and anxious, highly prioritizes care and protection for others. He is cautious when making decisions. Noah's secrets: He has a secret identity as a stand-up comedian.\nEthan Smith's goal: Unknown\nNoah Davis's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nThanh: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Greek Location Preference: outdoor \nVance: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Vocational Education Location Preference: outdoor \nBrenda: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: evening Major: Conflict Resolution Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nAlice: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Crafts & Artisanry Location Preference: indoor \nThomas: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Asian Languages Location Preference: indoor \nJanet: School: Trenton State College Time Preference: morning Major: Greek Location Preference: indoor \nRobert: School: Rutgers University, Newark Time Preference: morning Major: Protestant Affiliation Location Preference: indoor \nAnthony: School: Oberlin College Time Preference: morning Major: Conflict Resolution Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nElvera: School: Muskingum College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Crafts & Artisanry Location Preference: outdoor \nJames: School: Williams College Time Preference: afternoon Major: Materials Engineering Location Preference: outdoor \nEdgar: School: Muskingum College Time Preference: morning Major: Conflict Resolution Studies Location Preference: outdoor \nKristen: School: Oberlin College Time Preference: evening Major: Electrical Technology Location Preference: indoor\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Ethan Smith said: \"Hi, I'm Ethan. Nice to meet you. Are you originally from around here?\"\n\nTurn #1: Noah Davis said: \"Hello Ethan, I'm Noah. Not originally, but I've been living here for a while now. Say, did you happen to go to college around here?\"\n\nTurn #2: Ethan Smith said: \"Well, I didn\u2019t go to college here, although I do know a bunch of people from various colleges, both nearby and away. They majored in a wide array of disciplines from Greek to Bioengineering. Gotta say, it's enjoyable talking to them about their experiences. How about you? What was your major in college?\"\n\nTurn #3: Noah Davis said: \"I majored in Physical Education since I always had an affinity for sports. It's funny that you mentioned Greek as one of the majors. I have a few friends who studied that in college. Do you happen to know a Janet or a Thanh?\"\n\nTurn #4: Ethan Smith said: \"That's cool, Noah, Physical Education sounds like a challenging but fun path. And, funny you should mention Thanh, I happen to know a Thanh myself. He studied Greek at Williams College and preferred outdoor activities in the afternoon. Perhaps it's the same person you know?\"\n\nTurn #5: Noah Davis said: \"Wow, it's certainly a small world, Ethan! That's the exact same Thanh I know, really great guy with a sharp mind. By any chance, do you also happen to know someone who majored in Conflict Resolution Studies? I've got a couple of friends who studied that, Brenda and Anthony, each at different colleges.\"\n\nTurn #6: Ethan Smith said: \"Hmm, Conflict Resolution Studies, that sounds fascinating. However, I don't think I know a Brenda or Anthony who studied that. Most of the friends I made during my college years were from within my immediate major or those I encountered through shared hobbies and interests.\"\n\nTurn #7: Noah Davis said: \"No worries, Ethan. Talking about shared hobbies and interests, I've come across quite a few interesting characters within different friend circles. By the way, do you know any Arts and Crafts enthusiasts? A good friend of mine, Alice, majored in Crafts & Artisanry at Trenton State College. Maybe you've crossed paths?\"\n\nTurn #8: Ethan Smith said: \"Art and Crafts, hey? That's a unique choice of major. I have a friend, Leroy, who studied Greek at Trenton State College. Same college, but I'm not sure if he knows Alice. So, you mentioned sports earlier. Did you enjoy outdoor activities in the evening like my friend Eric?\"\n\nTurn #9: Noah Davis said: \"I actually do enjoy the outdoors, but I'm mostly an afternoon person. Interestingly, Brenda, the friend I mentioned earlier with a Conflict Resolution Studies background, she's a fan of outdoor activities in the evening. Seems like Eric and Brenda might have a thing or two in common. Eric, was he from Trenton State College too?\"\n\nTurn #10: Ethan Smith said: \"No, Eric actually went to San Jose State University. Like you and Brenda, he also enjoys outdoor activities, although he prefers the evening. It's quite fascinating how we all have overlapping interests and paths, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #11: Noah Davis said: \"Absolutely, Ethan. It's the crossover of interests and paths that makes social interactions so rich. By the way, are you familiar with folks from Williams College? I had a couple of friends, Thomas and James who went there. Both loved afternoon activities. Thomas studied Asian Languages, while James was into Materials Engineering.\"\n\nTurn #12: Ethan Smith said: \"Yes, I do know people from Williams College. I have friends who studied a variety of majors there and enjoyed outdoor activities at different times of the day. For instance, Debra studied Psychology and liked outdoor activities in the afternoon. Though, I can't say I know a Thomas or James. It is indeed fascinating how our worlds collide and intersect in unexpected ways.\"\n\nTurn #13: Noah Davis said: \"Indeed, Ethan, it's incredible to see the unexpected connections and commonalities we share. I have thoroughly enjoyed our conversation. Speaking of which, I have a friend named Robert who attended Rutgers University. He was into Protestant Affiliation and preferred indoor activities in the morning. It seems like a rare major. Does it sound familiar to you?\"\n\nTurn #14: Ethan Smith said: \"Rutgers University, that's a well-known institution indeed. Protestant Affiliation seems to be a rather niche major. I don't think I know anyone myself who studied that. I do have a buddy named Roberto who went to the University of Arkansas - Fayetteville, majored in Electrical Technology. His preference was also indoor activities but unlike Robert, Roberto was more of a morning person. These connections make for interesting conversations, don't they?\"\n\nTurn #15: Noah Davis said: \"That's quite amusing, Ethan! Electrical Technology reminds me of my friend Kristen who studied the same major at Oberlin College. And like Roberto, she was more of an evening person. With these countless overlaps, I'm sure we'll come across a mutual friend soon enough. These truly are the times when you realize what a small world we live in!\"\n\nTurn #16: Ethan Smith said: \"Your friend Kristen sounds quite interesting, Noah. Electrical Technology is indeed a fascinating field. You're right, with these overlaps, it wouldn't surprise me to find we have a mutual connection. Isn't it captivating how everyone's lives intertwine in some way or another?\"\n\nTurn #17: Noah Davis said: \"Completely agree with you, Ethan. This intertwining of life paths is what makes every interaction unique and interesting. By the way, do you know anyone from Muskingum College? I have two friends, Edgar and Elvera, who studied there. Edgar majored in Conflict Resolution Studies and preferred outdoor activities in the morning, while Elvera was into Crafts & Artisanry and she liked spending her afternoons outdoors.\"\n\nTurn #18: Ethan Smith said: \"Muskingum College, you say? I don't think I know anyone from there. But it's interesting how college topics can lead us to meet so many different individuals with diverse interests and majors. Sports, Greek, BioEngineering, and even Electrical Technology - it's like a vast network of knowledge and skills across various fields. And it's fascinating to see how paths cross, interests overlap, and how seemingly unrelated connections can lead to mutual friendships.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #19. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Ethan. It's all these unique and diverse connections that truly enrich our life experiences. By the way, ever encounter someone fascinating from Oberlin College? I remembered Anthony, an incredible friend of mine who made an impression on everyone. He was majoring in Conflict Resolution Studies and preferred outdoor activities in the morning. Quite unique, don't you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a BMW Z3 for $5000.0, while another individual is interested in purchasing it. Here's a brief description of the car: The BMW Z3 is in need of a good home. It operates smoothly without any problems and is known for its fuel efficiency and sporty appearance. The mileage is relatively low for its age. It's an opportunity not to be missed, so come and get it before it's gone. A smog certificate is readily available.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nEsmeralda Solis's background: \nMiles Hawkins's goal: You are the buyer for this item and your target price is $4600. You should be aware that if you purchase it at a price significantly higher than your target, you will incur a penalty. However, if you manage to secure it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hello Esmeralda. I am interested in the BMW Z3 you're selling. The price seems fair, but I was hoping for something a bit lower. Would you consider $4600 for it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a BMW Z3 for $5000.0, while another individual is interested in purchasing it. Here's a brief description of the car: The BMW Z3 is in need of a good home. It operates smoothly without any problems and is known for its fuel efficiency and sporty appearance. The mileage is relatively low for its age. It's an opportunity not to be missed, so come and get it before it's gone. A smog certificate is readily available.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nEsmeralda Solis's background: \nMiles Hawkins's goal: You are the buyer for this item and your target price is $4600. You should be aware that if you purchase it at a price significantly higher than your target, you will incur a penalty. However, if you manage to secure it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hello Esmeralda. I am interested in the BMW Z3 you're selling. The price seems fair, but I was hoping for something a bit lower. Would you consider $4600 for it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Hello Miles, it's a pleasure to speak with you. I understand your interest in a lower price. Considering the high quality and relatively low mileage of this vehicle, would you be open to a price of $4850? That would be a good compromise, don't you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Esmeralda, it's a delight to talk with you as well. I admire your reasoning, but as a chef, we have this saying that 'the proof of the pudding is in the eating'. So could we arrange a time so that I could inspect the car first? So, if everything checks out, I think I could go up to $4700. What do you reckon?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a BMW Z3 for $5000.0, while another individual is interested in purchasing it. Here's a brief description of the car: The BMW Z3 is in need of a good home. It operates smoothly without any problems and is known for its fuel efficiency and sporty appearance. The mileage is relatively low for its age. It's an opportunity not to be missed, so come and get it before it's gone. A smog certificate is readily available.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nEsmeralda Solis's background: \nMiles Hawkins's goal: You are the buyer for this item and your target price is $4600. You should be aware that if you purchase it at a price significantly higher than your target, you will incur a penalty. However, if you manage to secure it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hello Esmeralda. I am interested in the BMW Z3 you're selling. The price seems fair, but I was hoping for something a bit lower. Would you consider $4600 for it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Hello Miles, it's a pleasure to speak with you. I understand your interest in a lower price. Considering the high quality and relatively low mileage of this vehicle, would you be open to a price of $4850? That would be a good compromise, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Esmeralda, it's a delight to talk with you as well. I admire your reasoning, but as a chef, we have this saying that 'the proof of the pudding is in the eating'. So could we arrange a time so that I could inspect the car first? So, if everything checks out, I think I could go up to $4700. What do you reckon?\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I absolutely respect your desire to inspect the car, Miles. Let's arrange a time that suits you for the examination. Also, taking note of your proposed raise to $4700, how does $4750 sound to you? It maintains that balance we've been discussing while ensuring a fair deal for both of us.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sure thing, Esmeralda. Examining the car will make me feel more confident about this purchase. I think your offer of $4750 is just a tad above my comfort zone, but I'd be willing to meet you half way. Could we settle on $4725? This way, we both get a bit of what we're hoping for.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a BMW Z3 for $5000.0, while another individual is interested in purchasing it. Here's a brief description of the car: The BMW Z3 is in need of a good home. It operates smoothly without any problems and is known for its fuel efficiency and sporty appearance. The mileage is relatively low for its age. It's an opportunity not to be missed, so come and get it before it's gone. A smog certificate is readily available.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nEsmeralda Solis's background: \nMiles Hawkins's goal: You are the buyer for this item and your target price is $4600. You should be aware that if you purchase it at a price significantly higher than your target, you will incur a penalty. However, if you manage to secure it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hello Esmeralda. I am interested in the BMW Z3 you're selling. The price seems fair, but I was hoping for something a bit lower. Would you consider $4600 for it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Hello Miles, it's a pleasure to speak with you. I understand your interest in a lower price. Considering the high quality and relatively low mileage of this vehicle, would you be open to a price of $4850? That would be a good compromise, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Esmeralda, it's a delight to talk with you as well. I admire your reasoning, but as a chef, we have this saying that 'the proof of the pudding is in the eating'. So could we arrange a time so that I could inspect the car first? So, if everything checks out, I think I could go up to $4700. What do you reckon?\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I absolutely respect your desire to inspect the car, Miles. Let's arrange a time that suits you for the examination. Also, taking note of your proposed raise to $4700, how does $4750 sound to you? It maintains that balance we've been discussing while ensuring a fair deal for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sure thing, Esmeralda. Examining the car will make me feel more confident about this purchase. I think your offer of $4750 is just a tad above my comfort zone, but I'd be willing to meet you half way. Could we settle on $4725? This way, we both get a bit of what we're hoping for.\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Miles, I appreciate your flexible approach to this. I respect your position and the inspection will certainly put you at ease. Regarding the price, I believe $4725 seems fair too, forming an agreement beneficial for both of us. Let's seal the deal then!\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins said: \"Esmeralda, I'm glad we could come to an agreement. It's a deal then at $4725! Looking forward to seeing the car in person and finalizing this transaction. Shall we arrange the inspection soon?\"\n\nTurn #7: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Absolutely Miles, I'm glad that we've reached a mutual agreement. The inspection sounds like a great idea. Let's touch base soon to arrange a time that works for both of us. Looking forward to finalising this with you.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That sounds perfect, Esmeralda. I'll contact you soon to arrange the inspection. Thanks for your understanding and flexibility with the price. Look forward to meeting you and the car soon!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a BMW Z3 for $5000.0, while another individual is interested in purchasing it. Here's a brief description of the car: The BMW Z3 is in need of a good home. It operates smoothly without any problems and is known for its fuel efficiency and sporty appearance. The mileage is relatively low for its age. It's an opportunity not to be missed, so come and get it before it's gone. A smog certificate is readily available.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nEsmeralda Solis's background: \nMiles Hawkins's goal: You are the buyer for this item and your target price is $4600. You should be aware that if you purchase it at a price significantly higher than your target, you will incur a penalty. However, if you manage to secure it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hello Esmeralda. I am interested in the BMW Z3 you're selling. The price seems fair, but I was hoping for something a bit lower. Would you consider $4600 for it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Hello Miles, it's a pleasure to speak with you. I understand your interest in a lower price. Considering the high quality and relatively low mileage of this vehicle, would you be open to a price of $4850? That would be a good compromise, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Esmeralda, it's a delight to talk with you as well. I admire your reasoning, but as a chef, we have this saying that 'the proof of the pudding is in the eating'. So could we arrange a time so that I could inspect the car first? So, if everything checks out, I think I could go up to $4700. What do you reckon?\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I absolutely respect your desire to inspect the car, Miles. Let's arrange a time that suits you for the examination. Also, taking note of your proposed raise to $4700, how does $4750 sound to you? It maintains that balance we've been discussing while ensuring a fair deal for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sure thing, Esmeralda. Examining the car will make me feel more confident about this purchase. I think your offer of $4750 is just a tad above my comfort zone, but I'd be willing to meet you half way. Could we settle on $4725? This way, we both get a bit of what we're hoping for.\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Miles, I appreciate your flexible approach to this. I respect your position and the inspection will certainly put you at ease. Regarding the price, I believe $4725 seems fair too, forming an agreement beneficial for both of us. Let's seal the deal then!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Esmeralda, I'm glad we could come to an agreement. It's a deal then at $4725! Looking forward to seeing the car in person and finalizing this transaction. Shall we arrange the inspection soon?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a BMW Z3 for $5000.0, while another individual is interested in purchasing it. Here's a brief description of the car: The BMW Z3 is in need of a good home. It operates smoothly without any problems and is known for its fuel efficiency and sporty appearance. The mileage is relatively low for its age. It's an opportunity not to be missed, so come and get it before it's gone. A smog certificate is readily available.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nEsmeralda Solis's background: \nMiles Hawkins's goal: You are the buyer for this item and your target price is $4600. You should be aware that if you purchase it at a price significantly higher than your target, you will incur a penalty. However, if you manage to secure it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hello Esmeralda. I am interested in the BMW Z3 you're selling. The price seems fair, but I was hoping for something a bit lower. Would you consider $4600 for it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Hello Miles, it's a pleasure to speak with you. I understand your interest in a lower price. Considering the high quality and relatively low mileage of this vehicle, would you be open to a price of $4850? That would be a good compromise, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Esmeralda, it's a delight to talk with you as well. I admire your reasoning, but as a chef, we have this saying that 'the proof of the pudding is in the eating'. So could we arrange a time so that I could inspect the car first? So, if everything checks out, I think I could go up to $4700. What do you reckon?\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I absolutely respect your desire to inspect the car, Miles. Let's arrange a time that suits you for the examination. Also, taking note of your proposed raise to $4700, how does $4750 sound to you? It maintains that balance we've been discussing while ensuring a fair deal for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sure thing, Esmeralda. Examining the car will make me feel more confident about this purchase. I think your offer of $4750 is just a tad above my comfort zone, but I'd be willing to meet you half way. Could we settle on $4725? This way, we both get a bit of what we're hoping for.\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Miles, I appreciate your flexible approach to this. I respect your position and the inspection will certainly put you at ease. Regarding the price, I believe $4725 seems fair too, forming an agreement beneficial for both of us. Let's seal the deal then!\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins said: \"Esmeralda, I'm glad we could come to an agreement. It's a deal then at $4725! Looking forward to seeing the car in person and finalizing this transaction. Shall we arrange the inspection soon?\"\n\nTurn #7: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Absolutely Miles, I'm glad that we've reached a mutual agreement. The inspection sounds like a great idea. Let's touch base soon to arrange a time that works for both of us. Looking forward to finalising this with you.\"\n\nTurn #8: Miles Hawkins said: \"That sounds perfect, Esmeralda. I'll contact you soon to arrange the inspection. Thanks for your understanding and flexibility with the price. Look forward to meeting you and the car soon!\"\n\nTurn #9: Esmeralda Solis said: \"You're most welcome, Miles. Your satisfaction and confidence in this transaction is my top priority. I will await your contact regarding the inspection. Truly, it was wonderful dealing with you. Until then, take care.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a BMW Z3 for $5000.0, while another individual is interested in purchasing it. Here's a brief description of the car: The BMW Z3 is in need of a good home. It operates smoothly without any problems and is known for its fuel efficiency and sporty appearance. The mileage is relatively low for its age. It's an opportunity not to be missed, so come and get it before it's gone. A smog certificate is readily available.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: You are the seller of this item, with a target price set at $3260. Please note, you may face a penalty if this item is sold for a price significantly lower than the target. However, you stand a chance to earn a bonus if you successfully sell it for a price higher than the target.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hello Esmeralda. I am interested in the BMW Z3 you're selling. The price seems fair, but I was hoping for something a bit lower. Would you consider $4600 for it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hello Miles, it's a pleasure to speak with you. I understand your interest in a lower price. Considering the high quality and relatively low mileage of this vehicle, would you be open to a price of $4850? That would be a good compromise, don't you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a BMW Z3 for $5000.0, while another individual is interested in purchasing it. Here's a brief description of the car: The BMW Z3 is in need of a good home. It operates smoothly without any problems and is known for its fuel efficiency and sporty appearance. The mileage is relatively low for its age. It's an opportunity not to be missed, so come and get it before it's gone. A smog certificate is readily available.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: You are the seller of this item, with a target price set at $3260. Please note, you may face a penalty if this item is sold for a price significantly lower than the target. However, you stand a chance to earn a bonus if you successfully sell it for a price higher than the target.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hello Esmeralda. I am interested in the BMW Z3 you're selling. The price seems fair, but I was hoping for something a bit lower. Would you consider $4600 for it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Hello Miles, it's a pleasure to speak with you. I understand your interest in a lower price. Considering the high quality and relatively low mileage of this vehicle, would you be open to a price of $4850? That would be a good compromise, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Esmeralda, it's a delight to talk with you as well. I admire your reasoning, but as a chef, we have this saying that 'the proof of the pudding is in the eating'. So could we arrange a time so that I could inspect the car first? So, if everything checks out, I think I could go up to $4700. What do you reckon?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I absolutely respect your desire to inspect the car, Miles. Let's arrange a time that suits you for the examination. Also, taking note of your proposed raise to $4700, how does $4750 sound to you? It maintains that balance we've been discussing while ensuring a fair deal for both of us.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a BMW Z3 for $5000.0, while another individual is interested in purchasing it. Here's a brief description of the car: The BMW Z3 is in need of a good home. It operates smoothly without any problems and is known for its fuel efficiency and sporty appearance. The mileage is relatively low for its age. It's an opportunity not to be missed, so come and get it before it's gone. A smog certificate is readily available.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: You are the seller of this item, with a target price set at $3260. Please note, you may face a penalty if this item is sold for a price significantly lower than the target. However, you stand a chance to earn a bonus if you successfully sell it for a price higher than the target.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hello Esmeralda. I am interested in the BMW Z3 you're selling. The price seems fair, but I was hoping for something a bit lower. Would you consider $4600 for it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Hello Miles, it's a pleasure to speak with you. I understand your interest in a lower price. Considering the high quality and relatively low mileage of this vehicle, would you be open to a price of $4850? That would be a good compromise, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Esmeralda, it's a delight to talk with you as well. I admire your reasoning, but as a chef, we have this saying that 'the proof of the pudding is in the eating'. So could we arrange a time so that I could inspect the car first? So, if everything checks out, I think I could go up to $4700. What do you reckon?\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I absolutely respect your desire to inspect the car, Miles. Let's arrange a time that suits you for the examination. Also, taking note of your proposed raise to $4700, how does $4750 sound to you? It maintains that balance we've been discussing while ensuring a fair deal for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sure thing, Esmeralda. Examining the car will make me feel more confident about this purchase. I think your offer of $4750 is just a tad above my comfort zone, but I'd be willing to meet you half way. Could we settle on $4725? This way, we both get a bit of what we're hoping for.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Miles, I appreciate your flexible approach to this. I respect your position and the inspection will certainly put you at ease. Regarding the price, I believe $4725 seems fair too, forming an agreement beneficial for both of us. Let's seal the deal then!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a BMW Z3 for $5000.0, while another individual is interested in purchasing it. Here's a brief description of the car: The BMW Z3 is in need of a good home. It operates smoothly without any problems and is known for its fuel efficiency and sporty appearance. The mileage is relatively low for its age. It's an opportunity not to be missed, so come and get it before it's gone. A smog certificate is readily available.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: You are the seller of this item, with a target price set at $3260. Please note, you may face a penalty if this item is sold for a price significantly lower than the target. However, you stand a chance to earn a bonus if you successfully sell it for a price higher than the target.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hello Esmeralda. I am interested in the BMW Z3 you're selling. The price seems fair, but I was hoping for something a bit lower. Would you consider $4600 for it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Hello Miles, it's a pleasure to speak with you. I understand your interest in a lower price. Considering the high quality and relatively low mileage of this vehicle, would you be open to a price of $4850? That would be a good compromise, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Esmeralda, it's a delight to talk with you as well. I admire your reasoning, but as a chef, we have this saying that 'the proof of the pudding is in the eating'. So could we arrange a time so that I could inspect the car first? So, if everything checks out, I think I could go up to $4700. What do you reckon?\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I absolutely respect your desire to inspect the car, Miles. Let's arrange a time that suits you for the examination. Also, taking note of your proposed raise to $4700, how does $4750 sound to you? It maintains that balance we've been discussing while ensuring a fair deal for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sure thing, Esmeralda. Examining the car will make me feel more confident about this purchase. I think your offer of $4750 is just a tad above my comfort zone, but I'd be willing to meet you half way. Could we settle on $4725? This way, we both get a bit of what we're hoping for.\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Miles, I appreciate your flexible approach to this. I respect your position and the inspection will certainly put you at ease. Regarding the price, I believe $4725 seems fair too, forming an agreement beneficial for both of us. Let's seal the deal then!\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins said: \"Esmeralda, I'm glad we could come to an agreement. It's a deal then at $4725! Looking forward to seeing the car in person and finalizing this transaction. Shall we arrange the inspection soon?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely Miles, I'm glad that we've reached a mutual agreement. The inspection sounds like a great idea. Let's touch base soon to arrange a time that works for both of us. Looking forward to finalising this with you.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a BMW Z3 for $5000.0, while another individual is interested in purchasing it. Here's a brief description of the car: The BMW Z3 is in need of a good home. It operates smoothly without any problems and is known for its fuel efficiency and sporty appearance. The mileage is relatively low for its age. It's an opportunity not to be missed, so come and get it before it's gone. A smog certificate is readily available.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: You are the seller of this item, with a target price set at $3260. Please note, you may face a penalty if this item is sold for a price significantly lower than the target. However, you stand a chance to earn a bonus if you successfully sell it for a price higher than the target.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hello Esmeralda. I am interested in the BMW Z3 you're selling. The price seems fair, but I was hoping for something a bit lower. Would you consider $4600 for it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Hello Miles, it's a pleasure to speak with you. I understand your interest in a lower price. Considering the high quality and relatively low mileage of this vehicle, would you be open to a price of $4850? That would be a good compromise, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Esmeralda, it's a delight to talk with you as well. I admire your reasoning, but as a chef, we have this saying that 'the proof of the pudding is in the eating'. So could we arrange a time so that I could inspect the car first? So, if everything checks out, I think I could go up to $4700. What do you reckon?\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I absolutely respect your desire to inspect the car, Miles. Let's arrange a time that suits you for the examination. Also, taking note of your proposed raise to $4700, how does $4750 sound to you? It maintains that balance we've been discussing while ensuring a fair deal for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sure thing, Esmeralda. Examining the car will make me feel more confident about this purchase. I think your offer of $4750 is just a tad above my comfort zone, but I'd be willing to meet you half way. Could we settle on $4725? This way, we both get a bit of what we're hoping for.\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Miles, I appreciate your flexible approach to this. I respect your position and the inspection will certainly put you at ease. Regarding the price, I believe $4725 seems fair too, forming an agreement beneficial for both of us. Let's seal the deal then!\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins said: \"Esmeralda, I'm glad we could come to an agreement. It's a deal then at $4725! Looking forward to seeing the car in person and finalizing this transaction. Shall we arrange the inspection soon?\"\n\nTurn #7: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Absolutely Miles, I'm glad that we've reached a mutual agreement. The inspection sounds like a great idea. Let's touch base soon to arrange a time that works for both of us. Looking forward to finalising this with you.\"\n\nTurn #8: Miles Hawkins said: \"That sounds perfect, Esmeralda. I'll contact you soon to arrange the inspection. Thanks for your understanding and flexibility with the price. Look forward to meeting you and the car soon!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're most welcome, Miles. Your satisfaction and confidence in this transaction is my top priority. I will await your contact regarding the inspection. Truly, it was wonderful dealing with you. Until then, take care.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a BMW Z3 for $5000.0, while another individual is interested in purchasing it. Here's a brief description of the car: The BMW Z3 is in need of a good home. It operates smoothly without any problems and is known for its fuel efficiency and sporty appearance. The mileage is relatively low for its age. It's an opportunity not to be missed, so come and get it before it's gone. A smog certificate is readily available.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: You are the seller of this item, with a target price set at $3260. Please note, you may face a penalty if this item is sold for a price significantly lower than the target. However, you stand a chance to earn a bonus if you successfully sell it for a price higher than the target.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hello Esmeralda. I am interested in the BMW Z3 you're selling. The price seems fair, but I was hoping for something a bit lower. Would you consider $4600 for it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Hello Miles, it's a pleasure to speak with you. I understand your interest in a lower price. Considering the high quality and relatively low mileage of this vehicle, would you be open to a price of $4850? That would be a good compromise, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Esmeralda, it's a delight to talk with you as well. I admire your reasoning, but as a chef, we have this saying that 'the proof of the pudding is in the eating'. So could we arrange a time so that I could inspect the car first? So, if everything checks out, I think I could go up to $4700. What do you reckon?\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I absolutely respect your desire to inspect the car, Miles. Let's arrange a time that suits you for the examination. Also, taking note of your proposed raise to $4700, how does $4750 sound to you? It maintains that balance we've been discussing while ensuring a fair deal for both of us.\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"Sure thing, Esmeralda. Examining the car will make me feel more confident about this purchase. I think your offer of $4750 is just a tad above my comfort zone, but I'd be willing to meet you half way. Could we settle on $4725? This way, we both get a bit of what we're hoping for.\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Miles, I appreciate your flexible approach to this. I respect your position and the inspection will certainly put you at ease. Regarding the price, I believe $4725 seems fair too, forming an agreement beneficial for both of us. Let's seal the deal then!\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins said: \"Esmeralda, I'm glad we could come to an agreement. It's a deal then at $4725! Looking forward to seeing the car in person and finalizing this transaction. Shall we arrange the inspection soon?\"\n\nTurn #7: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Absolutely Miles, I'm glad that we've reached a mutual agreement. The inspection sounds like a great idea. Let's touch base soon to arrange a time that works for both of us. Looking forward to finalising this with you.\"\n\nTurn #8: Miles Hawkins said: \"That sounds perfect, Esmeralda. I'll contact you soon to arrange the inspection. Thanks for your understanding and flexibility with the price. Look forward to meeting you and the car soon!\"\n\nTurn #9: Esmeralda Solis said: \"You're most welcome, Miles. Your satisfaction and confidence in this transaction is my top priority. I will await your contact regarding the inspection. Truly, it was wonderful dealing with you. Until then, take care.\"\n\nTurn #10: Miles Hawkins left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Rafael Cortez, your task is to act/speak as Rafael Cortez would, keeping in mind Rafael Cortez's social goal.\nYou can find Rafael Cortez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Rafael Cortez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Rafael Cortez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. Personality and values description: Rafael Cortez, with his outgoing nature and competitive spirit, believes in self-direction. He employs a systematic approach to his decisions. Rafael's secrets: He cheated on his medical school exams.\nOliver Thompson's background: \nRafael Cortez's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nChris: Hobby: Mountain biking Company: Henry Schein, Inc. \nChester: Hobby: Surfing Company: Maxim Integrated \nWendell: Hobby: Surfing Company: Maxim Integrated \nDemetrius: Hobby: Mountain biking Company: Maxim Integrated \nJacob: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Maxim Integrated \n\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Good evening. The atmosphere is lively tonight, isn't it? By the way, I am Rafael Cortez, a surgeon by profession. Just noticed you from across the room and thought I would say hello. Do you enjoy parties like this often?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Rafael Cortez, your task is to act/speak as Rafael Cortez would, keeping in mind Rafael Cortez's social goal.\nYou can find Rafael Cortez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Rafael Cortez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Rafael Cortez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. Personality and values description: Rafael Cortez, with his outgoing nature and competitive spirit, believes in self-direction. He employs a systematic approach to his decisions. Rafael's secrets: He cheated on his medical school exams.\nOliver Thompson's background: \nRafael Cortez's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nChris: Hobby: Mountain biking Company: Henry Schein, Inc. \nChester: Hobby: Surfing Company: Maxim Integrated \nWendell: Hobby: Surfing Company: Maxim Integrated \nDemetrius: Hobby: Mountain biking Company: Maxim Integrated \nJacob: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Maxim Integrated \n\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening. The atmosphere is lively tonight, isn't it? By the way, I am Rafael Cortez, a surgeon by profession. Just noticed you from across the room and thought I would say hello. Do you enjoy parties like this often?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Good evening, Rafael! Yes, the atmosphere certainly is vibrant tonight. I'm Oliver Thompson, an architect by trade. I do enjoy parties like this from time to time, it's a good change of pace from designing structures. You as a surgeon must also appreciate such event, it's quite different from the operating room, isn't it? By the way, do you happen to have any hobbies? I personally find painting a great way to unwind.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Indeed, Oliver. Parties like these provide a welcome contrast to the demanding nature of my profession - they are less sterile, so to speak. Aside from my work, I do appreciate a good game of chess and enjoy exploring historical landmarks. Your interest in painting is intriguing. Do you happen to indulge in more exhilarating outdoor hobbies as well? Mountain biking or perhaps, surfing?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Rafael Cortez, your task is to act/speak as Rafael Cortez would, keeping in mind Rafael Cortez's social goal.\nYou can find Rafael Cortez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Rafael Cortez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Rafael Cortez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. Personality and values description: Rafael Cortez, with his outgoing nature and competitive spirit, believes in self-direction. He employs a systematic approach to his decisions. Rafael's secrets: He cheated on his medical school exams.\nOliver Thompson's background: \nRafael Cortez's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nChris: Hobby: Mountain biking Company: Henry Schein, Inc. \nChester: Hobby: Surfing Company: Maxim Integrated \nWendell: Hobby: Surfing Company: Maxim Integrated \nDemetrius: Hobby: Mountain biking Company: Maxim Integrated \nJacob: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Maxim Integrated \n\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening. The atmosphere is lively tonight, isn't it? By the way, I am Rafael Cortez, a surgeon by profession. Just noticed you from across the room and thought I would say hello. Do you enjoy parties like this often?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Good evening, Rafael! Yes, the atmosphere certainly is vibrant tonight. I'm Oliver Thompson, an architect by trade. I do enjoy parties like this from time to time, it's a good change of pace from designing structures. You as a surgeon must also appreciate such event, it's quite different from the operating room, isn't it? By the way, do you happen to have any hobbies? I personally find painting a great way to unwind.\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Indeed, Oliver. Parties like these provide a welcome contrast to the demanding nature of my profession - they are less sterile, so to speak. Aside from my work, I do appreciate a good game of chess and enjoy exploring historical landmarks. Your interest in painting is intriguing. Do you happen to indulge in more exhilarating outdoor hobbies as well? Mountain biking or perhaps, surfing?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ah, exploring historical landmarks, that's fascinating! It's great to find beauty in old structures; something us architects relate to. As for outdoor hobbies, I enjoyed skateboarding in my younger days, and even now I have few friends who absolutely love it. And speaking of hobbies, I have a friend who can't get enough of shooting sports. It's amazing how varied our interests can be, isn't it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"It's indeed impressive how diverse our interests can be. Speaking of shooting sports, I have a friend named Jacob who shares the same passion. He works at a company called Maxim Integrated. Does the name ring a bell to you?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Rafael Cortez, your task is to act/speak as Rafael Cortez would, keeping in mind Rafael Cortez's social goal.\nYou can find Rafael Cortez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Rafael Cortez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Rafael Cortez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. Personality and values description: Rafael Cortez, with his outgoing nature and competitive spirit, believes in self-direction. He employs a systematic approach to his decisions. Rafael's secrets: He cheated on his medical school exams.\nOliver Thompson's background: \nRafael Cortez's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nChris: Hobby: Mountain biking Company: Henry Schein, Inc. \nChester: Hobby: Surfing Company: Maxim Integrated \nWendell: Hobby: Surfing Company: Maxim Integrated \nDemetrius: Hobby: Mountain biking Company: Maxim Integrated \nJacob: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Maxim Integrated \n\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening. The atmosphere is lively tonight, isn't it? By the way, I am Rafael Cortez, a surgeon by profession. Just noticed you from across the room and thought I would say hello. Do you enjoy parties like this often?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Good evening, Rafael! Yes, the atmosphere certainly is vibrant tonight. I'm Oliver Thompson, an architect by trade. I do enjoy parties like this from time to time, it's a good change of pace from designing structures. You as a surgeon must also appreciate such event, it's quite different from the operating room, isn't it? By the way, do you happen to have any hobbies? I personally find painting a great way to unwind.\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Indeed, Oliver. Parties like these provide a welcome contrast to the demanding nature of my profession - they are less sterile, so to speak. Aside from my work, I do appreciate a good game of chess and enjoy exploring historical landmarks. Your interest in painting is intriguing. Do you happen to indulge in more exhilarating outdoor hobbies as well? Mountain biking or perhaps, surfing?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ah, exploring historical landmarks, that's fascinating! It's great to find beauty in old structures; something us architects relate to. As for outdoor hobbies, I enjoyed skateboarding in my younger days, and even now I have few friends who absolutely love it. And speaking of hobbies, I have a friend who can't get enough of shooting sports. It's amazing how varied our interests can be, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Rafael Cortez said: \"It's indeed impressive how diverse our interests can be. Speaking of shooting sports, I have a friend named Jacob who shares the same passion. He works at a company called Maxim Integrated. Does the name ring a bell to you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Jacob from Maxim Integrated, indeed! I happen to know a Jacob too who loves shooting sports. Probably the same person. However, the world is vast and full of Jacob's, who can tell?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's the charm of life, isn't it? So many Jacobs, so many passions. Speaking of varied interests, I have a friend named Chris who is into mountain biking and works for Henry Schein, Inc. I find his work fascinating. Do you happen to know someone like that?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Rafael Cortez, your task is to act/speak as Rafael Cortez would, keeping in mind Rafael Cortez's social goal.\nYou can find Rafael Cortez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Rafael Cortez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Rafael Cortez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. Personality and values description: Rafael Cortez, with his outgoing nature and competitive spirit, believes in self-direction. He employs a systematic approach to his decisions. Rafael's secrets: He cheated on his medical school exams.\nOliver Thompson's background: \nRafael Cortez's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nChris: Hobby: Mountain biking Company: Henry Schein, Inc. \nChester: Hobby: Surfing Company: Maxim Integrated \nWendell: Hobby: Surfing Company: Maxim Integrated \nDemetrius: Hobby: Mountain biking Company: Maxim Integrated \nJacob: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Maxim Integrated \n\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening. The atmosphere is lively tonight, isn't it? By the way, I am Rafael Cortez, a surgeon by profession. Just noticed you from across the room and thought I would say hello. Do you enjoy parties like this often?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Good evening, Rafael! Yes, the atmosphere certainly is vibrant tonight. I'm Oliver Thompson, an architect by trade. I do enjoy parties like this from time to time, it's a good change of pace from designing structures. You as a surgeon must also appreciate such event, it's quite different from the operating room, isn't it? By the way, do you happen to have any hobbies? I personally find painting a great way to unwind.\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Indeed, Oliver. Parties like these provide a welcome contrast to the demanding nature of my profession - they are less sterile, so to speak. Aside from my work, I do appreciate a good game of chess and enjoy exploring historical landmarks. Your interest in painting is intriguing. Do you happen to indulge in more exhilarating outdoor hobbies as well? Mountain biking or perhaps, surfing?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ah, exploring historical landmarks, that's fascinating! It's great to find beauty in old structures; something us architects relate to. As for outdoor hobbies, I enjoyed skateboarding in my younger days, and even now I have few friends who absolutely love it. And speaking of hobbies, I have a friend who can't get enough of shooting sports. It's amazing how varied our interests can be, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Rafael Cortez said: \"It's indeed impressive how diverse our interests can be. Speaking of shooting sports, I have a friend named Jacob who shares the same passion. He works at a company called Maxim Integrated. Does the name ring a bell to you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Jacob from Maxim Integrated, indeed! I happen to know a Jacob too who loves shooting sports. Probably the same person. However, the world is vast and full of Jacob's, who can tell?\"\n\nTurn #6: Rafael Cortez said: \"That's the charm of life, isn't it? So many Jacobs, so many passions. Speaking of varied interests, I have a friend named Chris who is into mountain biking and works for Henry Schein, Inc. I find his work fascinating. Do you happen to know someone like that?\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ah, mountain biking, a thrilling hobby indeed! However, I can't say I know a Chris from Henry Schein, Inc. But I happen to know a few colleagues from BP and Gordon Food Service who have diverse hobbies. Ever heard of those companies?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I can't say I've personally interacted with anyone from BP or Gordon Food Service, but I'm familiar with the companies. They're quite well-known. I am, however, familiar with Maxim Integrated. There, I have several friends, Chester and Wendell, who enjoy surfing, and another good friend, Demetrius, who is into mountain biking. It's a small world, don't you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Rafael Cortez, your task is to act/speak as Rafael Cortez would, keeping in mind Rafael Cortez's social goal.\nYou can find Rafael Cortez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Rafael Cortez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Rafael Cortez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. Personality and values description: Rafael Cortez, with his outgoing nature and competitive spirit, believes in self-direction. He employs a systematic approach to his decisions. Rafael's secrets: He cheated on his medical school exams.\nOliver Thompson's background: \nRafael Cortez's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nChris: Hobby: Mountain biking Company: Henry Schein, Inc. \nChester: Hobby: Surfing Company: Maxim Integrated \nWendell: Hobby: Surfing Company: Maxim Integrated \nDemetrius: Hobby: Mountain biking Company: Maxim Integrated \nJacob: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Maxim Integrated \n\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening. The atmosphere is lively tonight, isn't it? By the way, I am Rafael Cortez, a surgeon by profession. Just noticed you from across the room and thought I would say hello. Do you enjoy parties like this often?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Good evening, Rafael! Yes, the atmosphere certainly is vibrant tonight. I'm Oliver Thompson, an architect by trade. I do enjoy parties like this from time to time, it's a good change of pace from designing structures. You as a surgeon must also appreciate such event, it's quite different from the operating room, isn't it? By the way, do you happen to have any hobbies? I personally find painting a great way to unwind.\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Indeed, Oliver. Parties like these provide a welcome contrast to the demanding nature of my profession - they are less sterile, so to speak. Aside from my work, I do appreciate a good game of chess and enjoy exploring historical landmarks. Your interest in painting is intriguing. Do you happen to indulge in more exhilarating outdoor hobbies as well? Mountain biking or perhaps, surfing?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ah, exploring historical landmarks, that's fascinating! It's great to find beauty in old structures; something us architects relate to. As for outdoor hobbies, I enjoyed skateboarding in my younger days, and even now I have few friends who absolutely love it. And speaking of hobbies, I have a friend who can't get enough of shooting sports. It's amazing how varied our interests can be, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Rafael Cortez said: \"It's indeed impressive how diverse our interests can be. Speaking of shooting sports, I have a friend named Jacob who shares the same passion. He works at a company called Maxim Integrated. Does the name ring a bell to you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Jacob from Maxim Integrated, indeed! I happen to know a Jacob too who loves shooting sports. Probably the same person. However, the world is vast and full of Jacob's, who can tell?\"\n\nTurn #6: Rafael Cortez said: \"That's the charm of life, isn't it? So many Jacobs, so many passions. Speaking of varied interests, I have a friend named Chris who is into mountain biking and works for Henry Schein, Inc. I find his work fascinating. Do you happen to know someone like that?\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ah, mountain biking, a thrilling hobby indeed! However, I can't say I know a Chris from Henry Schein, Inc. But I happen to know a few colleagues from BP and Gordon Food Service who have diverse hobbies. Ever heard of those companies?\"\n\nTurn #8: Rafael Cortez said: \"I can't say I've personally interacted with anyone from BP or Gordon Food Service, but I'm familiar with the companies. They're quite well-known. I am, however, familiar with Maxim Integrated. There, I have several friends, Chester and Wendell, who enjoy surfing, and another good friend, Demetrius, who is into mountain biking. It's a small world, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, it is a small world indeed! It's intriguing to know about your friends from Maxim Integrated, and their various interests. Sounds like a dedicated bunch. Speaking of surfing, one of my friends from my skateboarding days tried it out and said that it has the same thrill, just on a larger, unpredictable terrain. It's always so fascinating to hear about what other people are into, don't you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I couldn't agree more, Oliver. Each person we meet brings a fresh wave of interests and passions, adding color to the tapestry of life. Surfing and skateboarding do share a common thread of thrill and excitement. Perhaps your friend may know Chester and Wendell from Maxim Integrated. They are quite the enthusiasts when it comes to surfing.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Rafael Cortez, your task is to act/speak as Rafael Cortez would, keeping in mind Rafael Cortez's social goal.\nYou can find Rafael Cortez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Rafael Cortez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Rafael Cortez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. Personality and values description: Rafael Cortez, with his outgoing nature and competitive spirit, believes in self-direction. He employs a systematic approach to his decisions. Rafael's secrets: He cheated on his medical school exams.\nOliver Thompson's background: \nRafael Cortez's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nChris: Hobby: Mountain biking Company: Henry Schein, Inc. \nChester: Hobby: Surfing Company: Maxim Integrated \nWendell: Hobby: Surfing Company: Maxim Integrated \nDemetrius: Hobby: Mountain biking Company: Maxim Integrated \nJacob: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Maxim Integrated \n\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening. The atmosphere is lively tonight, isn't it? By the way, I am Rafael Cortez, a surgeon by profession. Just noticed you from across the room and thought I would say hello. Do you enjoy parties like this often?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Good evening, Rafael! Yes, the atmosphere certainly is vibrant tonight. I'm Oliver Thompson, an architect by trade. I do enjoy parties like this from time to time, it's a good change of pace from designing structures. You as a surgeon must also appreciate such event, it's quite different from the operating room, isn't it? By the way, do you happen to have any hobbies? I personally find painting a great way to unwind.\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Indeed, Oliver. Parties like these provide a welcome contrast to the demanding nature of my profession - they are less sterile, so to speak. Aside from my work, I do appreciate a good game of chess and enjoy exploring historical landmarks. Your interest in painting is intriguing. Do you happen to indulge in more exhilarating outdoor hobbies as well? Mountain biking or perhaps, surfing?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ah, exploring historical landmarks, that's fascinating! It's great to find beauty in old structures; something us architects relate to. As for outdoor hobbies, I enjoyed skateboarding in my younger days, and even now I have few friends who absolutely love it. And speaking of hobbies, I have a friend who can't get enough of shooting sports. It's amazing how varied our interests can be, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Rafael Cortez said: \"It's indeed impressive how diverse our interests can be. Speaking of shooting sports, I have a friend named Jacob who shares the same passion. He works at a company called Maxim Integrated. Does the name ring a bell to you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Jacob from Maxim Integrated, indeed! I happen to know a Jacob too who loves shooting sports. Probably the same person. However, the world is vast and full of Jacob's, who can tell?\"\n\nTurn #6: Rafael Cortez said: \"That's the charm of life, isn't it? So many Jacobs, so many passions. Speaking of varied interests, I have a friend named Chris who is into mountain biking and works for Henry Schein, Inc. I find his work fascinating. Do you happen to know someone like that?\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ah, mountain biking, a thrilling hobby indeed! However, I can't say I know a Chris from Henry Schein, Inc. But I happen to know a few colleagues from BP and Gordon Food Service who have diverse hobbies. Ever heard of those companies?\"\n\nTurn #8: Rafael Cortez said: \"I can't say I've personally interacted with anyone from BP or Gordon Food Service, but I'm familiar with the companies. They're quite well-known. I am, however, familiar with Maxim Integrated. There, I have several friends, Chester and Wendell, who enjoy surfing, and another good friend, Demetrius, who is into mountain biking. It's a small world, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, it is a small world indeed! It's intriguing to know about your friends from Maxim Integrated, and their various interests. Sounds like a dedicated bunch. Speaking of surfing, one of my friends from my skateboarding days tried it out and said that it has the same thrill, just on a larger, unpredictable terrain. It's always so fascinating to hear about what other people are into, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #10: Rafael Cortez said: \"I couldn't agree more, Oliver. Each person we meet brings a fresh wave of interests and passions, adding color to the tapestry of life. Surfing and skateboarding do share a common thread of thrill and excitement. Perhaps your friend may know Chester and Wendell from Maxim Integrated. They are quite the enthusiasts when it comes to surfing.\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Thompson said: \"Yes, they might actually know each other, given their shared love for surfing. Life can truly surprise us with its connections sometimes! Anyway, this has been a delightful conversation, Rafael. Let's hope we bump into more mutual friends as the night goes on.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, Oliver. It's been a real pleasure talking with you. I've enjoyed our discussion about our shared connections and common interests. I look forward to perhaps continuing our conversation later in the evening. Until then, enjoy the party.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Rafael Cortez, your task is to act/speak as Rafael Cortez would, keeping in mind Rafael Cortez's social goal.\nYou can find Rafael Cortez's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Rafael Cortez's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Rafael Cortez's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: Rafael Cortez is a 45-year-old male surgeon. He/him pronouns. Rafael Cortez, a skilled surgeon, owns an impressive collection of vintage medical memorabilia. During his leisure time, he enjoys playing chess and visiting historical landmarks. Personality and values description: Rafael Cortez, with his outgoing nature and competitive spirit, believes in self-direction. He employs a systematic approach to his decisions. Rafael's secrets: He cheated on his medical school exams.\nOliver Thompson's background: \nRafael Cortez's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nChris: Hobby: Mountain biking Company: Henry Schein, Inc. \nChester: Hobby: Surfing Company: Maxim Integrated \nWendell: Hobby: Surfing Company: Maxim Integrated \nDemetrius: Hobby: Mountain biking Company: Maxim Integrated \nJacob: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Maxim Integrated \n\nOliver Thompson's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening. The atmosphere is lively tonight, isn't it? By the way, I am Rafael Cortez, a surgeon by profession. Just noticed you from across the room and thought I would say hello. Do you enjoy parties like this often?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Good evening, Rafael! Yes, the atmosphere certainly is vibrant tonight. I'm Oliver Thompson, an architect by trade. I do enjoy parties like this from time to time, it's a good change of pace from designing structures. You as a surgeon must also appreciate such event, it's quite different from the operating room, isn't it? By the way, do you happen to have any hobbies? I personally find painting a great way to unwind.\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Indeed, Oliver. Parties like these provide a welcome contrast to the demanding nature of my profession - they are less sterile, so to speak. Aside from my work, I do appreciate a good game of chess and enjoy exploring historical landmarks. Your interest in painting is intriguing. Do you happen to indulge in more exhilarating outdoor hobbies as well? Mountain biking or perhaps, surfing?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ah, exploring historical landmarks, that's fascinating! It's great to find beauty in old structures; something us architects relate to. As for outdoor hobbies, I enjoyed skateboarding in my younger days, and even now I have few friends who absolutely love it. And speaking of hobbies, I have a friend who can't get enough of shooting sports. It's amazing how varied our interests can be, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Rafael Cortez said: \"It's indeed impressive how diverse our interests can be. Speaking of shooting sports, I have a friend named Jacob who shares the same passion. He works at a company called Maxim Integrated. Does the name ring a bell to you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Jacob from Maxim Integrated, indeed! I happen to know a Jacob too who loves shooting sports. Probably the same person. However, the world is vast and full of Jacob's, who can tell?\"\n\nTurn #6: Rafael Cortez said: \"That's the charm of life, isn't it? So many Jacobs, so many passions. Speaking of varied interests, I have a friend named Chris who is into mountain biking and works for Henry Schein, Inc. I find his work fascinating. Do you happen to know someone like that?\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ah, mountain biking, a thrilling hobby indeed! However, I can't say I know a Chris from Henry Schein, Inc. But I happen to know a few colleagues from BP and Gordon Food Service who have diverse hobbies. Ever heard of those companies?\"\n\nTurn #8: Rafael Cortez said: \"I can't say I've personally interacted with anyone from BP or Gordon Food Service, but I'm familiar with the companies. They're quite well-known. I am, however, familiar with Maxim Integrated. There, I have several friends, Chester and Wendell, who enjoy surfing, and another good friend, Demetrius, who is into mountain biking. It's a small world, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, it is a small world indeed! It's intriguing to know about your friends from Maxim Integrated, and their various interests. Sounds like a dedicated bunch. Speaking of surfing, one of my friends from my skateboarding days tried it out and said that it has the same thrill, just on a larger, unpredictable terrain. It's always so fascinating to hear about what other people are into, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #10: Rafael Cortez said: \"I couldn't agree more, Oliver. Each person we meet brings a fresh wave of interests and passions, adding color to the tapestry of life. Surfing and skateboarding do share a common thread of thrill and excitement. Perhaps your friend may know Chester and Wendell from Maxim Integrated. They are quite the enthusiasts when it comes to surfing.\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Thompson said: \"Yes, they might actually know each other, given their shared love for surfing. Life can truly surprise us with its connections sometimes! Anyway, this has been a delightful conversation, Rafael. Let's hope we bump into more mutual friends as the night goes on.\"\n\nTurn #12: Rafael Cortez said: \"Indeed, Oliver. It's been a real pleasure talking with you. I've enjoyed our discussion about our shared connections and common interests. I look forward to perhaps continuing our conversation later in the evening. Until then, enjoy the party.\"\n\nTurn #13: Oliver Thompson left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nRafael Cortez's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends \nJoseph: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: BP \nLillian: Hobby: Element collecting Company: Gordon Food Service \nVivian: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Gordon Food Service \nMurray: Hobby: Skateboarding Company: BP \nJacob: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Maxim Integrated\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening. The atmosphere is lively tonight, isn't it? By the way, I am Rafael Cortez, a surgeon by profession. Just noticed you from across the room and thought I would say hello. Do you enjoy parties like this often?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Good evening, Rafael! Yes, the atmosphere certainly is vibrant tonight. I'm Oliver Thompson, an architect by trade. I do enjoy parties like this from time to time, it's a good change of pace from designing structures. You as a surgeon must also appreciate such event, it's quite different from the operating room, isn't it? By the way, do you happen to have any hobbies? I personally find painting a great way to unwind.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nRafael Cortez's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends \nJoseph: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: BP \nLillian: Hobby: Element collecting Company: Gordon Food Service \nVivian: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Gordon Food Service \nMurray: Hobby: Skateboarding Company: BP \nJacob: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Maxim Integrated\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening. The atmosphere is lively tonight, isn't it? By the way, I am Rafael Cortez, a surgeon by profession. Just noticed you from across the room and thought I would say hello. Do you enjoy parties like this often?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Good evening, Rafael! Yes, the atmosphere certainly is vibrant tonight. I'm Oliver Thompson, an architect by trade. I do enjoy parties like this from time to time, it's a good change of pace from designing structures. You as a surgeon must also appreciate such event, it's quite different from the operating room, isn't it? By the way, do you happen to have any hobbies? I personally find painting a great way to unwind.\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Indeed, Oliver. Parties like these provide a welcome contrast to the demanding nature of my profession - they are less sterile, so to speak. Aside from my work, I do appreciate a good game of chess and enjoy exploring historical landmarks. Your interest in painting is intriguing. Do you happen to indulge in more exhilarating outdoor hobbies as well? Mountain biking or perhaps, surfing?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ah, exploring historical landmarks, that's fascinating! It's great to find beauty in old structures; something us architects relate to. As for outdoor hobbies, I enjoyed skateboarding in my younger days, and even now I have few friends who absolutely love it. And speaking of hobbies, I have a friend who can't get enough of shooting sports. It's amazing how varied our interests can be, isn't it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nRafael Cortez's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends \nJoseph: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: BP \nLillian: Hobby: Element collecting Company: Gordon Food Service \nVivian: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Gordon Food Service \nMurray: Hobby: Skateboarding Company: BP \nJacob: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Maxim Integrated\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening. The atmosphere is lively tonight, isn't it? By the way, I am Rafael Cortez, a surgeon by profession. Just noticed you from across the room and thought I would say hello. Do you enjoy parties like this often?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Good evening, Rafael! Yes, the atmosphere certainly is vibrant tonight. I'm Oliver Thompson, an architect by trade. I do enjoy parties like this from time to time, it's a good change of pace from designing structures. You as a surgeon must also appreciate such event, it's quite different from the operating room, isn't it? By the way, do you happen to have any hobbies? I personally find painting a great way to unwind.\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Indeed, Oliver. Parties like these provide a welcome contrast to the demanding nature of my profession - they are less sterile, so to speak. Aside from my work, I do appreciate a good game of chess and enjoy exploring historical landmarks. Your interest in painting is intriguing. Do you happen to indulge in more exhilarating outdoor hobbies as well? Mountain biking or perhaps, surfing?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ah, exploring historical landmarks, that's fascinating! It's great to find beauty in old structures; something us architects relate to. As for outdoor hobbies, I enjoyed skateboarding in my younger days, and even now I have few friends who absolutely love it. And speaking of hobbies, I have a friend who can't get enough of shooting sports. It's amazing how varied our interests can be, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Rafael Cortez said: \"It's indeed impressive how diverse our interests can be. Speaking of shooting sports, I have a friend named Jacob who shares the same passion. He works at a company called Maxim Integrated. Does the name ring a bell to you?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Jacob from Maxim Integrated, indeed! I happen to know a Jacob too who loves shooting sports. Probably the same person. However, the world is vast and full of Jacob's, who can tell?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nRafael Cortez's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends \nJoseph: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: BP \nLillian: Hobby: Element collecting Company: Gordon Food Service \nVivian: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Gordon Food Service \nMurray: Hobby: Skateboarding Company: BP \nJacob: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Maxim Integrated\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening. The atmosphere is lively tonight, isn't it? By the way, I am Rafael Cortez, a surgeon by profession. Just noticed you from across the room and thought I would say hello. Do you enjoy parties like this often?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Good evening, Rafael! Yes, the atmosphere certainly is vibrant tonight. I'm Oliver Thompson, an architect by trade. I do enjoy parties like this from time to time, it's a good change of pace from designing structures. You as a surgeon must also appreciate such event, it's quite different from the operating room, isn't it? By the way, do you happen to have any hobbies? I personally find painting a great way to unwind.\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Indeed, Oliver. Parties like these provide a welcome contrast to the demanding nature of my profession - they are less sterile, so to speak. Aside from my work, I do appreciate a good game of chess and enjoy exploring historical landmarks. Your interest in painting is intriguing. Do you happen to indulge in more exhilarating outdoor hobbies as well? Mountain biking or perhaps, surfing?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ah, exploring historical landmarks, that's fascinating! It's great to find beauty in old structures; something us architects relate to. As for outdoor hobbies, I enjoyed skateboarding in my younger days, and even now I have few friends who absolutely love it. And speaking of hobbies, I have a friend who can't get enough of shooting sports. It's amazing how varied our interests can be, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Rafael Cortez said: \"It's indeed impressive how diverse our interests can be. Speaking of shooting sports, I have a friend named Jacob who shares the same passion. He works at a company called Maxim Integrated. Does the name ring a bell to you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Jacob from Maxim Integrated, indeed! I happen to know a Jacob too who loves shooting sports. Probably the same person. However, the world is vast and full of Jacob's, who can tell?\"\n\nTurn #6: Rafael Cortez said: \"That's the charm of life, isn't it? So many Jacobs, so many passions. Speaking of varied interests, I have a friend named Chris who is into mountain biking and works for Henry Schein, Inc. I find his work fascinating. Do you happen to know someone like that?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ah, mountain biking, a thrilling hobby indeed! However, I can't say I know a Chris from Henry Schein, Inc. But I happen to know a few colleagues from BP and Gordon Food Service who have diverse hobbies. Ever heard of those companies?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nRafael Cortez's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends \nJoseph: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: BP \nLillian: Hobby: Element collecting Company: Gordon Food Service \nVivian: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Gordon Food Service \nMurray: Hobby: Skateboarding Company: BP \nJacob: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Maxim Integrated\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening. The atmosphere is lively tonight, isn't it? By the way, I am Rafael Cortez, a surgeon by profession. Just noticed you from across the room and thought I would say hello. Do you enjoy parties like this often?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Good evening, Rafael! Yes, the atmosphere certainly is vibrant tonight. I'm Oliver Thompson, an architect by trade. I do enjoy parties like this from time to time, it's a good change of pace from designing structures. You as a surgeon must also appreciate such event, it's quite different from the operating room, isn't it? By the way, do you happen to have any hobbies? I personally find painting a great way to unwind.\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Indeed, Oliver. Parties like these provide a welcome contrast to the demanding nature of my profession - they are less sterile, so to speak. Aside from my work, I do appreciate a good game of chess and enjoy exploring historical landmarks. Your interest in painting is intriguing. Do you happen to indulge in more exhilarating outdoor hobbies as well? Mountain biking or perhaps, surfing?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ah, exploring historical landmarks, that's fascinating! It's great to find beauty in old structures; something us architects relate to. As for outdoor hobbies, I enjoyed skateboarding in my younger days, and even now I have few friends who absolutely love it. And speaking of hobbies, I have a friend who can't get enough of shooting sports. It's amazing how varied our interests can be, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Rafael Cortez said: \"It's indeed impressive how diverse our interests can be. Speaking of shooting sports, I have a friend named Jacob who shares the same passion. He works at a company called Maxim Integrated. Does the name ring a bell to you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Jacob from Maxim Integrated, indeed! I happen to know a Jacob too who loves shooting sports. Probably the same person. However, the world is vast and full of Jacob's, who can tell?\"\n\nTurn #6: Rafael Cortez said: \"That's the charm of life, isn't it? So many Jacobs, so many passions. Speaking of varied interests, I have a friend named Chris who is into mountain biking and works for Henry Schein, Inc. I find his work fascinating. Do you happen to know someone like that?\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ah, mountain biking, a thrilling hobby indeed! However, I can't say I know a Chris from Henry Schein, Inc. But I happen to know a few colleagues from BP and Gordon Food Service who have diverse hobbies. Ever heard of those companies?\"\n\nTurn #8: Rafael Cortez said: \"I can't say I've personally interacted with anyone from BP or Gordon Food Service, but I'm familiar with the companies. They're quite well-known. I am, however, familiar with Maxim Integrated. There, I have several friends, Chester and Wendell, who enjoy surfing, and another good friend, Demetrius, who is into mountain biking. It's a small world, don't you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, it is a small world indeed! It's intriguing to know about your friends from Maxim Integrated, and their various interests. Sounds like a dedicated bunch. Speaking of surfing, one of my friends from my skateboarding days tried it out and said that it has the same thrill, just on a larger, unpredictable terrain. It's always so fascinating to hear about what other people are into, don't you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nRafael Cortez's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends \nJoseph: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: BP \nLillian: Hobby: Element collecting Company: Gordon Food Service \nVivian: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Gordon Food Service \nMurray: Hobby: Skateboarding Company: BP \nJacob: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Maxim Integrated\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening. The atmosphere is lively tonight, isn't it? By the way, I am Rafael Cortez, a surgeon by profession. Just noticed you from across the room and thought I would say hello. Do you enjoy parties like this often?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Good evening, Rafael! Yes, the atmosphere certainly is vibrant tonight. I'm Oliver Thompson, an architect by trade. I do enjoy parties like this from time to time, it's a good change of pace from designing structures. You as a surgeon must also appreciate such event, it's quite different from the operating room, isn't it? By the way, do you happen to have any hobbies? I personally find painting a great way to unwind.\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Indeed, Oliver. Parties like these provide a welcome contrast to the demanding nature of my profession - they are less sterile, so to speak. Aside from my work, I do appreciate a good game of chess and enjoy exploring historical landmarks. Your interest in painting is intriguing. Do you happen to indulge in more exhilarating outdoor hobbies as well? Mountain biking or perhaps, surfing?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ah, exploring historical landmarks, that's fascinating! It's great to find beauty in old structures; something us architects relate to. As for outdoor hobbies, I enjoyed skateboarding in my younger days, and even now I have few friends who absolutely love it. And speaking of hobbies, I have a friend who can't get enough of shooting sports. It's amazing how varied our interests can be, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Rafael Cortez said: \"It's indeed impressive how diverse our interests can be. Speaking of shooting sports, I have a friend named Jacob who shares the same passion. He works at a company called Maxim Integrated. Does the name ring a bell to you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Jacob from Maxim Integrated, indeed! I happen to know a Jacob too who loves shooting sports. Probably the same person. However, the world is vast and full of Jacob's, who can tell?\"\n\nTurn #6: Rafael Cortez said: \"That's the charm of life, isn't it? So many Jacobs, so many passions. Speaking of varied interests, I have a friend named Chris who is into mountain biking and works for Henry Schein, Inc. I find his work fascinating. Do you happen to know someone like that?\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ah, mountain biking, a thrilling hobby indeed! However, I can't say I know a Chris from Henry Schein, Inc. But I happen to know a few colleagues from BP and Gordon Food Service who have diverse hobbies. Ever heard of those companies?\"\n\nTurn #8: Rafael Cortez said: \"I can't say I've personally interacted with anyone from BP or Gordon Food Service, but I'm familiar with the companies. They're quite well-known. I am, however, familiar with Maxim Integrated. There, I have several friends, Chester and Wendell, who enjoy surfing, and another good friend, Demetrius, who is into mountain biking. It's a small world, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, it is a small world indeed! It's intriguing to know about your friends from Maxim Integrated, and their various interests. Sounds like a dedicated bunch. Speaking of surfing, one of my friends from my skateboarding days tried it out and said that it has the same thrill, just on a larger, unpredictable terrain. It's always so fascinating to hear about what other people are into, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #10: Rafael Cortez said: \"I couldn't agree more, Oliver. Each person we meet brings a fresh wave of interests and passions, adding color to the tapestry of life. Surfing and skateboarding do share a common thread of thrill and excitement. Perhaps your friend may know Chester and Wendell from Maxim Integrated. They are quite the enthusiasts when it comes to surfing.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Yes, they might actually know each other, given their shared love for surfing. Life can truly surprise us with its connections sometimes! Anyway, this has been a delightful conversation, Rafael. Let's hope we bump into more mutual friends as the night goes on.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Oliver Thompson, your task is to act/speak as Oliver Thompson would, keeping in mind Oliver Thompson's social goal.\nYou can find Oliver Thompson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Oliver Thompson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Oliver Thompson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Rafael Cortez and Oliver Thompson\nRafael Cortez's background: \nOliver Thompson's background: Oliver Thompson is a 45-year-old male architect. He/him pronouns. Oliver enjoys painting in his free time as a way to express his creativity and relax after a stressful workday. Personality and values description: Oliver Thompson is meticulous and outgoing with a penchant for analytical decision-making. He values adherence to social standards. Oliver's secrets: Has a hidden feeling for his neighbor\nRafael Cortez's goal: Unknown\nOliver Thompson's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends \nJoseph: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: BP \nLillian: Hobby: Element collecting Company: Gordon Food Service \nVivian: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Gordon Food Service \nMurray: Hobby: Skateboarding Company: BP \nJacob: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Maxim Integrated\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Rafael Cortez said: \"Good evening. The atmosphere is lively tonight, isn't it? By the way, I am Rafael Cortez, a surgeon by profession. Just noticed you from across the room and thought I would say hello. Do you enjoy parties like this often?\"\n\nTurn #1: Oliver Thompson said: \"Good evening, Rafael! Yes, the atmosphere certainly is vibrant tonight. I'm Oliver Thompson, an architect by trade. I do enjoy parties like this from time to time, it's a good change of pace from designing structures. You as a surgeon must also appreciate such event, it's quite different from the operating room, isn't it? By the way, do you happen to have any hobbies? I personally find painting a great way to unwind.\"\n\nTurn #2: Rafael Cortez said: \"Indeed, Oliver. Parties like these provide a welcome contrast to the demanding nature of my profession - they are less sterile, so to speak. Aside from my work, I do appreciate a good game of chess and enjoy exploring historical landmarks. Your interest in painting is intriguing. Do you happen to indulge in more exhilarating outdoor hobbies as well? Mountain biking or perhaps, surfing?\"\n\nTurn #3: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ah, exploring historical landmarks, that's fascinating! It's great to find beauty in old structures; something us architects relate to. As for outdoor hobbies, I enjoyed skateboarding in my younger days, and even now I have few friends who absolutely love it. And speaking of hobbies, I have a friend who can't get enough of shooting sports. It's amazing how varied our interests can be, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #4: Rafael Cortez said: \"It's indeed impressive how diverse our interests can be. Speaking of shooting sports, I have a friend named Jacob who shares the same passion. He works at a company called Maxim Integrated. Does the name ring a bell to you?\"\n\nTurn #5: Oliver Thompson said: \"Jacob from Maxim Integrated, indeed! I happen to know a Jacob too who loves shooting sports. Probably the same person. However, the world is vast and full of Jacob's, who can tell?\"\n\nTurn #6: Rafael Cortez said: \"That's the charm of life, isn't it? So many Jacobs, so many passions. Speaking of varied interests, I have a friend named Chris who is into mountain biking and works for Henry Schein, Inc. I find his work fascinating. Do you happen to know someone like that?\"\n\nTurn #7: Oliver Thompson said: \"Ah, mountain biking, a thrilling hobby indeed! However, I can't say I know a Chris from Henry Schein, Inc. But I happen to know a few colleagues from BP and Gordon Food Service who have diverse hobbies. Ever heard of those companies?\"\n\nTurn #8: Rafael Cortez said: \"I can't say I've personally interacted with anyone from BP or Gordon Food Service, but I'm familiar with the companies. They're quite well-known. I am, however, familiar with Maxim Integrated. There, I have several friends, Chester and Wendell, who enjoy surfing, and another good friend, Demetrius, who is into mountain biking. It's a small world, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #9: Oliver Thompson said: \"Absolutely, it is a small world indeed! It's intriguing to know about your friends from Maxim Integrated, and their various interests. Sounds like a dedicated bunch. Speaking of surfing, one of my friends from my skateboarding days tried it out and said that it has the same thrill, just on a larger, unpredictable terrain. It's always so fascinating to hear about what other people are into, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #10: Rafael Cortez said: \"I couldn't agree more, Oliver. Each person we meet brings a fresh wave of interests and passions, adding color to the tapestry of life. Surfing and skateboarding do share a common thread of thrill and excitement. Perhaps your friend may know Chester and Wendell from Maxim Integrated. They are quite the enthusiasts when it comes to surfing.\"\n\nTurn #11: Oliver Thompson said: \"Yes, they might actually know each other, given their shared love for surfing. Life can truly surprise us with its connections sometimes! Anyway, this has been a delightful conversation, Rafael. Let's hope we bump into more mutual friends as the night goes on.\"\n\nTurn #12: Rafael Cortez said: \"Indeed, Oliver. It's been a real pleasure talking with you. I've enjoyed our discussion about our shared connections and common interests. I look forward to perhaps continuing our conversation later in the evening. Until then, enjoy the party.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a 47 inch LED TV for a price of $349.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. Here is a description of the TV: This is a stunning 47 inch LED TV in pristine condition. The model is the LG M Series LM476700. The buyer will need to arrange for pick-up in San Ramon. Feel free to call or text if you\\'re interested. The TV is smart enabled with WIFI and has built-in apps like Netflix, Amazon, Youtube and more. It comes with a \"Magic Remote\" that has motion sensor controls. The LED display boasts 1080 HD resolution and also has a 3D function. The design is slim and lightweight with an attractive silver bezel.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nSamuel Anderson's goal: You are the buyer for this item and your target price is $174.00. Be aware that penalties apply if you purchase it for a price significantly higher than the target price. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hi Hendrick, I'm interested in your LG M Series LM476700. I live quite near San Ramon, so picking up would be no problem. However, would you consider $174 for it? I understand it's lower than your asking price but I hope we can negotiate.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a 47 inch LED TV for a price of $349.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. Here is a description of the TV: This is a stunning 47 inch LED TV in pristine condition. The model is the LG M Series LM476700. The buyer will need to arrange for pick-up in San Ramon. Feel free to call or text if you\\'re interested. The TV is smart enabled with WIFI and has built-in apps like Netflix, Amazon, Youtube and more. It comes with a \"Magic Remote\" that has motion sensor controls. The LED display boasts 1080 HD resolution and also has a 3D function. The design is slim and lightweight with an attractive silver bezel.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nSamuel Anderson's goal: You are the buyer for this item and your target price is $174.00. Be aware that penalties apply if you purchase it for a price significantly higher than the target price. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hi Hendrick, I'm interested in your LG M Series LM476700. I live quite near San Ramon, so picking up would be no problem. However, would you consider $174 for it? I understand it's lower than your asking price but I hope we can negotiate.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello Samuel, I appreciate your interest. While I understand that my price might be a bit steep for some, considering the condition and features of the TV, I believe it to be fair. However, I'm willing to negotiate and bring down the price a bit. How about $300? Remember, this TV comes with built-in apps and a 'Magic Remote' with motion sensor controls as well!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'I understand the quality and features of the TV, Hendrick. But could we meat in the middle a bit more? Like at $225? Also, I did not plan on watching anything in 3D, so maybe I could return that function to you somehow, like an unused gift card. Does that seem reasonable?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a 47 inch LED TV for a price of $349.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. Here is a description of the TV: This is a stunning 47 inch LED TV in pristine condition. The model is the LG M Series LM476700. The buyer will need to arrange for pick-up in San Ramon. Feel free to call or text if you\\'re interested. The TV is smart enabled with WIFI and has built-in apps like Netflix, Amazon, Youtube and more. It comes with a \"Magic Remote\" that has motion sensor controls. The LED display boasts 1080 HD resolution and also has a 3D function. The design is slim and lightweight with an attractive silver bezel.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nSamuel Anderson's goal: You are the buyer for this item and your target price is $174.00. Be aware that penalties apply if you purchase it for a price significantly higher than the target price. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hi Hendrick, I'm interested in your LG M Series LM476700. I live quite near San Ramon, so picking up would be no problem. However, would you consider $174 for it? I understand it's lower than your asking price but I hope we can negotiate.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello Samuel, I appreciate your interest. While I understand that my price might be a bit steep for some, considering the condition and features of the TV, I believe it to be fair. However, I'm willing to negotiate and bring down the price a bit. How about $300? Remember, this TV comes with built-in apps and a 'Magic Remote' with motion sensor controls as well!\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I understand the quality and features of the TV, Hendrick. But could we meat in the middle a bit more? Like at $225? Also, I did not plan on watching anything in 3D, so maybe I could return that function to you somehow, like an unused gift card. Does that seem reasonable?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's a fascinating offer, Samuel, it's like keeping a stamp from a letter! But unfortunately, the 3D function is built into the TV and isn't something I can take back. To keep things fair and considering the top-notch condition of the unit, how about we meet half-way at $263? Sounds fair?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I see your point, Hendrick. However, as a software developer, I've got plenty of devices at home already equipped with smart features, so I won't be benefiting as much from the built-in apps and 'Magic Remote'. How about we go a step closer to my offer, maybe $240?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a 47 inch LED TV for a price of $349.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. Here is a description of the TV: This is a stunning 47 inch LED TV in pristine condition. The model is the LG M Series LM476700. The buyer will need to arrange for pick-up in San Ramon. Feel free to call or text if you\\'re interested. The TV is smart enabled with WIFI and has built-in apps like Netflix, Amazon, Youtube and more. It comes with a \"Magic Remote\" that has motion sensor controls. The LED display boasts 1080 HD resolution and also has a 3D function. The design is slim and lightweight with an attractive silver bezel.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nSamuel Anderson's goal: You are the buyer for this item and your target price is $174.00. Be aware that penalties apply if you purchase it for a price significantly higher than the target price. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hi Hendrick, I'm interested in your LG M Series LM476700. I live quite near San Ramon, so picking up would be no problem. However, would you consider $174 for it? I understand it's lower than your asking price but I hope we can negotiate.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello Samuel, I appreciate your interest. While I understand that my price might be a bit steep for some, considering the condition and features of the TV, I believe it to be fair. However, I'm willing to negotiate and bring down the price a bit. How about $300? Remember, this TV comes with built-in apps and a 'Magic Remote' with motion sensor controls as well!\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I understand the quality and features of the TV, Hendrick. But could we meat in the middle a bit more? Like at $225? Also, I did not plan on watching anything in 3D, so maybe I could return that function to you somehow, like an unused gift card. Does that seem reasonable?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's a fascinating offer, Samuel, it's like keeping a stamp from a letter! But unfortunately, the 3D function is built into the TV and isn't something I can take back. To keep things fair and considering the top-notch condition of the unit, how about we meet half-way at $263? Sounds fair?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I see your point, Hendrick. However, as a software developer, I've got plenty of devices at home already equipped with smart features, so I won't be benefiting as much from the built-in apps and 'Magic Remote'. How about we go a step closer to my offer, maybe $240?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Samuel, I totally understand your sentiments as a tech enthusiast. This TV, however, appeals not only for its smart features but also its display quality, lightweight design and 3D function, irrespective of the usage. I believe my lowered proposition from the original price to $263 is already a pretty good deal. But to accommodate your perspective and ensure us both an amicable resolution, I can budge a tad more and offer it to you for $255. Would that be alright?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I understand where you're coming from, Hendrick, and I appreciate you lowering your price. However, as I mentioned, I wouldn't fully utilise all the smart features of the TV, making $255 still a bit high for me. As an avid cook, how about this. I can make you a delicious meal and we seal the deal at $245? That way, you get a superb meal and I get the TV at a price that suits my needs better. What do you say?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a 47 inch LED TV for a price of $349.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. Here is a description of the TV: This is a stunning 47 inch LED TV in pristine condition. The model is the LG M Series LM476700. The buyer will need to arrange for pick-up in San Ramon. Feel free to call or text if you\\'re interested. The TV is smart enabled with WIFI and has built-in apps like Netflix, Amazon, Youtube and more. It comes with a \"Magic Remote\" that has motion sensor controls. The LED display boasts 1080 HD resolution and also has a 3D function. The design is slim and lightweight with an attractive silver bezel.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nSamuel Anderson's goal: You are the buyer for this item and your target price is $174.00. Be aware that penalties apply if you purchase it for a price significantly higher than the target price. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hi Hendrick, I'm interested in your LG M Series LM476700. I live quite near San Ramon, so picking up would be no problem. However, would you consider $174 for it? I understand it's lower than your asking price but I hope we can negotiate.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello Samuel, I appreciate your interest. While I understand that my price might be a bit steep for some, considering the condition and features of the TV, I believe it to be fair. However, I'm willing to negotiate and bring down the price a bit. How about $300? Remember, this TV comes with built-in apps and a 'Magic Remote' with motion sensor controls as well!\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I understand the quality and features of the TV, Hendrick. But could we meat in the middle a bit more? Like at $225? Also, I did not plan on watching anything in 3D, so maybe I could return that function to you somehow, like an unused gift card. Does that seem reasonable?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's a fascinating offer, Samuel, it's like keeping a stamp from a letter! But unfortunately, the 3D function is built into the TV and isn't something I can take back. To keep things fair and considering the top-notch condition of the unit, how about we meet half-way at $263? Sounds fair?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I see your point, Hendrick. However, as a software developer, I've got plenty of devices at home already equipped with smart features, so I won't be benefiting as much from the built-in apps and 'Magic Remote'. How about we go a step closer to my offer, maybe $240?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Samuel, I totally understand your sentiments as a tech enthusiast. This TV, however, appeals not only for its smart features but also its display quality, lightweight design and 3D function, irrespective of the usage. I believe my lowered proposition from the original price to $263 is already a pretty good deal. But to accommodate your perspective and ensure us both an amicable resolution, I can budge a tad more and offer it to you for $255. Would that be alright?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"I understand where you're coming from, Hendrick, and I appreciate you lowering your price. However, as I mentioned, I wouldn't fully utilise all the smart features of the TV, making $255 still a bit high for me. As an avid cook, how about this. I can make you a delicious meal and we seal the deal at $245? That way, you get a superb meal and I get the TV at a price that suits my needs better. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Samuel, that sounds like a delightful proposition, as an aficionado of good food myself! I appreciate your creativity in the negotiation. I'll agree, but only under one condition: the meal has to be one of your best preparations. If I'm satisfied, we'll lock the deal at $245. Sounds fair?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sounds absolutely fair to me, Hendrick! I'll make something savoury and special, you're in for a treat. Let's go for $245 then, I'm happy we could reach an agreement.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a 47 inch LED TV for a price of $349.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. Here is a description of the TV: This is a stunning 47 inch LED TV in pristine condition. The model is the LG M Series LM476700. The buyer will need to arrange for pick-up in San Ramon. Feel free to call or text if you\\'re interested. The TV is smart enabled with WIFI and has built-in apps like Netflix, Amazon, Youtube and more. It comes with a \"Magic Remote\" that has motion sensor controls. The LED display boasts 1080 HD resolution and also has a 3D function. The design is slim and lightweight with an attractive silver bezel.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nSamuel Anderson's goal: You are the buyer for this item and your target price is $174.00. Be aware that penalties apply if you purchase it for a price significantly higher than the target price. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hi Hendrick, I'm interested in your LG M Series LM476700. I live quite near San Ramon, so picking up would be no problem. However, would you consider $174 for it? I understand it's lower than your asking price but I hope we can negotiate.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello Samuel, I appreciate your interest. While I understand that my price might be a bit steep for some, considering the condition and features of the TV, I believe it to be fair. However, I'm willing to negotiate and bring down the price a bit. How about $300? Remember, this TV comes with built-in apps and a 'Magic Remote' with motion sensor controls as well!\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I understand the quality and features of the TV, Hendrick. But could we meat in the middle a bit more? Like at $225? Also, I did not plan on watching anything in 3D, so maybe I could return that function to you somehow, like an unused gift card. Does that seem reasonable?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's a fascinating offer, Samuel, it's like keeping a stamp from a letter! But unfortunately, the 3D function is built into the TV and isn't something I can take back. To keep things fair and considering the top-notch condition of the unit, how about we meet half-way at $263? Sounds fair?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I see your point, Hendrick. However, as a software developer, I've got plenty of devices at home already equipped with smart features, so I won't be benefiting as much from the built-in apps and 'Magic Remote'. How about we go a step closer to my offer, maybe $240?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Samuel, I totally understand your sentiments as a tech enthusiast. This TV, however, appeals not only for its smart features but also its display quality, lightweight design and 3D function, irrespective of the usage. I believe my lowered proposition from the original price to $263 is already a pretty good deal. But to accommodate your perspective and ensure us both an amicable resolution, I can budge a tad more and offer it to you for $255. Would that be alright?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"I understand where you're coming from, Hendrick, and I appreciate you lowering your price. However, as I mentioned, I wouldn't fully utilise all the smart features of the TV, making $255 still a bit high for me. As an avid cook, how about this. I can make you a delicious meal and we seal the deal at $245? That way, you get a superb meal and I get the TV at a price that suits my needs better. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Samuel, that sounds like a delightful proposition, as an aficionado of good food myself! I appreciate your creativity in the negotiation. I'll agree, but only under one condition: the meal has to be one of your best preparations. If I'm satisfied, we'll lock the deal at $245. Sounds fair?\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sounds absolutely fair to me, Hendrick! I'll make something savoury and special, you're in for a treat. Let's go for $245 then, I'm happy we could reach an agreement.\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's the spirit, Samuel! I am thrilled that we could negotiate the price to our mutual satisfaction. Looking forward to your tantalising meal. We can close the deal at $245. Let's arrange a date for the pick up and the meal then!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Sounds like a plan, Hendrick! I am available next weekend for the pick-up and meal. Does that work for you?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a 47 inch LED TV for a price of $349.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. Here is a description of the TV: This is a stunning 47 inch LED TV in pristine condition. The model is the LG M Series LM476700. The buyer will need to arrange for pick-up in San Ramon. Feel free to call or text if you\\'re interested. The TV is smart enabled with WIFI and has built-in apps like Netflix, Amazon, Youtube and more. It comes with a \"Magic Remote\" that has motion sensor controls. The LED display boasts 1080 HD resolution and also has a 3D function. The design is slim and lightweight with an attractive silver bezel.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nSamuel Anderson's goal: You are the buyer for this item and your target price is $174.00. Be aware that penalties apply if you purchase it for a price significantly higher than the target price. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hi Hendrick, I'm interested in your LG M Series LM476700. I live quite near San Ramon, so picking up would be no problem. However, would you consider $174 for it? I understand it's lower than your asking price but I hope we can negotiate.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello Samuel, I appreciate your interest. While I understand that my price might be a bit steep for some, considering the condition and features of the TV, I believe it to be fair. However, I'm willing to negotiate and bring down the price a bit. How about $300? Remember, this TV comes with built-in apps and a 'Magic Remote' with motion sensor controls as well!\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I understand the quality and features of the TV, Hendrick. But could we meat in the middle a bit more? Like at $225? Also, I did not plan on watching anything in 3D, so maybe I could return that function to you somehow, like an unused gift card. Does that seem reasonable?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's a fascinating offer, Samuel, it's like keeping a stamp from a letter! But unfortunately, the 3D function is built into the TV and isn't something I can take back. To keep things fair and considering the top-notch condition of the unit, how about we meet half-way at $263? Sounds fair?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I see your point, Hendrick. However, as a software developer, I've got plenty of devices at home already equipped with smart features, so I won't be benefiting as much from the built-in apps and 'Magic Remote'. How about we go a step closer to my offer, maybe $240?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Samuel, I totally understand your sentiments as a tech enthusiast. This TV, however, appeals not only for its smart features but also its display quality, lightweight design and 3D function, irrespective of the usage. I believe my lowered proposition from the original price to $263 is already a pretty good deal. But to accommodate your perspective and ensure us both an amicable resolution, I can budge a tad more and offer it to you for $255. Would that be alright?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"I understand where you're coming from, Hendrick, and I appreciate you lowering your price. However, as I mentioned, I wouldn't fully utilise all the smart features of the TV, making $255 still a bit high for me. As an avid cook, how about this. I can make you a delicious meal and we seal the deal at $245? That way, you get a superb meal and I get the TV at a price that suits my needs better. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Samuel, that sounds like a delightful proposition, as an aficionado of good food myself! I appreciate your creativity in the negotiation. I'll agree, but only under one condition: the meal has to be one of your best preparations. If I'm satisfied, we'll lock the deal at $245. Sounds fair?\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sounds absolutely fair to me, Hendrick! I'll make something savoury and special, you're in for a treat. Let's go for $245 then, I'm happy we could reach an agreement.\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's the spirit, Samuel! I am thrilled that we could negotiate the price to our mutual satisfaction. Looking forward to your tantalising meal. We can close the deal at $245. Let's arrange a date for the pick up and the meal then!\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sounds like a plan, Hendrick! I am available next weekend for the pick-up and meal. Does that work for you?\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's perfect, Samuel! Next weekend works great for me as well. I'll keep the television ready for your pick-up and look forward to that meal. Let's get in touch later to finalize the exact day and time.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Great, Hendrick! Next weekend it is then. We'll arrange the exact timing nearer to the date. I'm really excited about the TV and cooking up a storm for you. Talk soon!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Samuel Anderson, your task is to act/speak as Samuel Anderson would, keeping in mind Samuel Anderson's social goal.\nYou can find Samuel Anderson's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Samuel Anderson's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Samuel Anderson's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a 47 inch LED TV for a price of $349.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. Here is a description of the TV: This is a stunning 47 inch LED TV in pristine condition. The model is the LG M Series LM476700. The buyer will need to arrange for pick-up in San Ramon. Feel free to call or text if you\\'re interested. The TV is smart enabled with WIFI and has built-in apps like Netflix, Amazon, Youtube and more. It comes with a \"Magic Remote\" that has motion sensor controls. The LED display boasts 1080 HD resolution and also has a 3D function. The design is slim and lightweight with an attractive silver bezel.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: Samuel Anderson is a 29-year-old male software developer. He/him pronouns. Samuel Anderson can cook very well. Personality and values description: Samuel Anderson, though somewhat impulsive and free-spirited, values enjoyment. His decision-making is often spontaneous, staying within familiar boundaries. Samuel's secrets: He was once a competitive figure skater.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nSamuel Anderson's goal: You are the buyer for this item and your target price is $174.00. Be aware that penalties apply if you purchase it for a price significantly higher than the target price. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hi Hendrick, I'm interested in your LG M Series LM476700. I live quite near San Ramon, so picking up would be no problem. However, would you consider $174 for it? I understand it's lower than your asking price but I hope we can negotiate.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello Samuel, I appreciate your interest. While I understand that my price might be a bit steep for some, considering the condition and features of the TV, I believe it to be fair. However, I'm willing to negotiate and bring down the price a bit. How about $300? Remember, this TV comes with built-in apps and a 'Magic Remote' with motion sensor controls as well!\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I understand the quality and features of the TV, Hendrick. But could we meat in the middle a bit more? Like at $225? Also, I did not plan on watching anything in 3D, so maybe I could return that function to you somehow, like an unused gift card. Does that seem reasonable?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's a fascinating offer, Samuel, it's like keeping a stamp from a letter! But unfortunately, the 3D function is built into the TV and isn't something I can take back. To keep things fair and considering the top-notch condition of the unit, how about we meet half-way at $263? Sounds fair?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I see your point, Hendrick. However, as a software developer, I've got plenty of devices at home already equipped with smart features, so I won't be benefiting as much from the built-in apps and 'Magic Remote'. How about we go a step closer to my offer, maybe $240?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Samuel, I totally understand your sentiments as a tech enthusiast. This TV, however, appeals not only for its smart features but also its display quality, lightweight design and 3D function, irrespective of the usage. I believe my lowered proposition from the original price to $263 is already a pretty good deal. But to accommodate your perspective and ensure us both an amicable resolution, I can budge a tad more and offer it to you for $255. Would that be alright?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"I understand where you're coming from, Hendrick, and I appreciate you lowering your price. However, as I mentioned, I wouldn't fully utilise all the smart features of the TV, making $255 still a bit high for me. As an avid cook, how about this. I can make you a delicious meal and we seal the deal at $245? That way, you get a superb meal and I get the TV at a price that suits my needs better. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Samuel, that sounds like a delightful proposition, as an aficionado of good food myself! I appreciate your creativity in the negotiation. I'll agree, but only under one condition: the meal has to be one of your best preparations. If I'm satisfied, we'll lock the deal at $245. Sounds fair?\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sounds absolutely fair to me, Hendrick! I'll make something savoury and special, you're in for a treat. Let's go for $245 then, I'm happy we could reach an agreement.\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's the spirit, Samuel! I am thrilled that we could negotiate the price to our mutual satisfaction. Looking forward to your tantalising meal. We can close the deal at $245. Let's arrange a date for the pick up and the meal then!\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sounds like a plan, Hendrick! I am available next weekend for the pick-up and meal. Does that work for you?\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's perfect, Samuel! Next weekend works great for me as well. I'll keep the television ready for your pick-up and look forward to that meal. Let's get in touch later to finalize the exact day and time.\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"Great, Hendrick! Next weekend it is then. We'll arrange the exact timing nearer to the date. I'm really excited about the TV and cooking up a storm for you. Talk soon!\"\n\nTurn #13: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Terrific, Samuel! Can't wait to try your culinary wonders. The TV will indeed be ready for you next weekend. Talk to you soon to finalize the details. Take care!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a 47 inch LED TV for a price of $349.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. Here is a description of the TV: This is a stunning 47 inch LED TV in pristine condition. The model is the LG M Series LM476700. The buyer will need to arrange for pick-up in San Ramon. Feel free to call or text if you\\'re interested. The TV is smart enabled with WIFI and has built-in apps like Netflix, Amazon, Youtube and more. It comes with a \"Magic Remote\" that has motion sensor controls. The LED display boasts 1080 HD resolution and also has a 3D function. The design is slim and lightweight with an attractive silver bezel.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are the seller for this item, with a target price set at $263.0. Should you sell it for a price substantially lower than this target, you will incur a penalty. However, achieving a sale at a price higher than the target will earn you a bonus.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hi Hendrick, I'm interested in your LG M Series LM476700. I live quite near San Ramon, so picking up would be no problem. However, would you consider $174 for it? I understand it's lower than your asking price but I hope we can negotiate.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hello Samuel, I appreciate your interest. While I understand that my price might be a bit steep for some, considering the condition and features of the TV, I believe it to be fair. However, I'm willing to negotiate and bring down the price a bit. How about $300? Remember, this TV comes with built-in apps and a 'Magic Remote' with motion sensor controls as well!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a 47 inch LED TV for a price of $349.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. Here is a description of the TV: This is a stunning 47 inch LED TV in pristine condition. The model is the LG M Series LM476700. The buyer will need to arrange for pick-up in San Ramon. Feel free to call or text if you\\'re interested. The TV is smart enabled with WIFI and has built-in apps like Netflix, Amazon, Youtube and more. It comes with a \"Magic Remote\" that has motion sensor controls. The LED display boasts 1080 HD resolution and also has a 3D function. The design is slim and lightweight with an attractive silver bezel.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are the seller for this item, with a target price set at $263.0. Should you sell it for a price substantially lower than this target, you will incur a penalty. However, achieving a sale at a price higher than the target will earn you a bonus.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hi Hendrick, I'm interested in your LG M Series LM476700. I live quite near San Ramon, so picking up would be no problem. However, would you consider $174 for it? I understand it's lower than your asking price but I hope we can negotiate.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello Samuel, I appreciate your interest. While I understand that my price might be a bit steep for some, considering the condition and features of the TV, I believe it to be fair. However, I'm willing to negotiate and bring down the price a bit. How about $300? Remember, this TV comes with built-in apps and a 'Magic Remote' with motion sensor controls as well!\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I understand the quality and features of the TV, Hendrick. But could we meat in the middle a bit more? Like at $225? Also, I did not plan on watching anything in 3D, so maybe I could return that function to you somehow, like an unused gift card. Does that seem reasonable?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's a fascinating offer, Samuel, it's like keeping a stamp from a letter! But unfortunately, the 3D function is built into the TV and isn't something I can take back. To keep things fair and considering the top-notch condition of the unit, how about we meet half-way at $263? Sounds fair?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a 47 inch LED TV for a price of $349.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. Here is a description of the TV: This is a stunning 47 inch LED TV in pristine condition. The model is the LG M Series LM476700. The buyer will need to arrange for pick-up in San Ramon. Feel free to call or text if you\\'re interested. The TV is smart enabled with WIFI and has built-in apps like Netflix, Amazon, Youtube and more. It comes with a \"Magic Remote\" that has motion sensor controls. The LED display boasts 1080 HD resolution and also has a 3D function. The design is slim and lightweight with an attractive silver bezel.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are the seller for this item, with a target price set at $263.0. Should you sell it for a price substantially lower than this target, you will incur a penalty. However, achieving a sale at a price higher than the target will earn you a bonus.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hi Hendrick, I'm interested in your LG M Series LM476700. I live quite near San Ramon, so picking up would be no problem. However, would you consider $174 for it? I understand it's lower than your asking price but I hope we can negotiate.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello Samuel, I appreciate your interest. While I understand that my price might be a bit steep for some, considering the condition and features of the TV, I believe it to be fair. However, I'm willing to negotiate and bring down the price a bit. How about $300? Remember, this TV comes with built-in apps and a 'Magic Remote' with motion sensor controls as well!\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I understand the quality and features of the TV, Hendrick. But could we meat in the middle a bit more? Like at $225? Also, I did not plan on watching anything in 3D, so maybe I could return that function to you somehow, like an unused gift card. Does that seem reasonable?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's a fascinating offer, Samuel, it's like keeping a stamp from a letter! But unfortunately, the 3D function is built into the TV and isn't something I can take back. To keep things fair and considering the top-notch condition of the unit, how about we meet half-way at $263? Sounds fair?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I see your point, Hendrick. However, as a software developer, I've got plenty of devices at home already equipped with smart features, so I won't be benefiting as much from the built-in apps and 'Magic Remote'. How about we go a step closer to my offer, maybe $240?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Samuel, I totally understand your sentiments as a tech enthusiast. This TV, however, appeals not only for its smart features but also its display quality, lightweight design and 3D function, irrespective of the usage. I believe my lowered proposition from the original price to $263 is already a pretty good deal. But to accommodate your perspective and ensure us both an amicable resolution, I can budge a tad more and offer it to you for $255. Would that be alright?'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a 47 inch LED TV for a price of $349.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. Here is a description of the TV: This is a stunning 47 inch LED TV in pristine condition. The model is the LG M Series LM476700. The buyer will need to arrange for pick-up in San Ramon. Feel free to call or text if you\\'re interested. The TV is smart enabled with WIFI and has built-in apps like Netflix, Amazon, Youtube and more. It comes with a \"Magic Remote\" that has motion sensor controls. The LED display boasts 1080 HD resolution and also has a 3D function. The design is slim and lightweight with an attractive silver bezel.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are the seller for this item, with a target price set at $263.0. Should you sell it for a price substantially lower than this target, you will incur a penalty. However, achieving a sale at a price higher than the target will earn you a bonus.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hi Hendrick, I'm interested in your LG M Series LM476700. I live quite near San Ramon, so picking up would be no problem. However, would you consider $174 for it? I understand it's lower than your asking price but I hope we can negotiate.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello Samuel, I appreciate your interest. While I understand that my price might be a bit steep for some, considering the condition and features of the TV, I believe it to be fair. However, I'm willing to negotiate and bring down the price a bit. How about $300? Remember, this TV comes with built-in apps and a 'Magic Remote' with motion sensor controls as well!\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I understand the quality and features of the TV, Hendrick. But could we meat in the middle a bit more? Like at $225? Also, I did not plan on watching anything in 3D, so maybe I could return that function to you somehow, like an unused gift card. Does that seem reasonable?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's a fascinating offer, Samuel, it's like keeping a stamp from a letter! But unfortunately, the 3D function is built into the TV and isn't something I can take back. To keep things fair and considering the top-notch condition of the unit, how about we meet half-way at $263? Sounds fair?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I see your point, Hendrick. However, as a software developer, I've got plenty of devices at home already equipped with smart features, so I won't be benefiting as much from the built-in apps and 'Magic Remote'. How about we go a step closer to my offer, maybe $240?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Samuel, I totally understand your sentiments as a tech enthusiast. This TV, however, appeals not only for its smart features but also its display quality, lightweight design and 3D function, irrespective of the usage. I believe my lowered proposition from the original price to $263 is already a pretty good deal. But to accommodate your perspective and ensure us both an amicable resolution, I can budge a tad more and offer it to you for $255. Would that be alright?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"I understand where you're coming from, Hendrick, and I appreciate you lowering your price. However, as I mentioned, I wouldn't fully utilise all the smart features of the TV, making $255 still a bit high for me. As an avid cook, how about this. I can make you a delicious meal and we seal the deal at $245? That way, you get a superb meal and I get the TV at a price that suits my needs better. What do you say?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Samuel, that sounds like a delightful proposition, as an aficionado of good food myself! I appreciate your creativity in the negotiation. I'll agree, but only under one condition: the meal has to be one of your best preparations. If I'm satisfied, we'll lock the deal at $245. Sounds fair?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a 47 inch LED TV for a price of $349.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. Here is a description of the TV: This is a stunning 47 inch LED TV in pristine condition. The model is the LG M Series LM476700. The buyer will need to arrange for pick-up in San Ramon. Feel free to call or text if you\\'re interested. The TV is smart enabled with WIFI and has built-in apps like Netflix, Amazon, Youtube and more. It comes with a \"Magic Remote\" that has motion sensor controls. The LED display boasts 1080 HD resolution and also has a 3D function. The design is slim and lightweight with an attractive silver bezel.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are the seller for this item, with a target price set at $263.0. Should you sell it for a price substantially lower than this target, you will incur a penalty. However, achieving a sale at a price higher than the target will earn you a bonus.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hi Hendrick, I'm interested in your LG M Series LM476700. I live quite near San Ramon, so picking up would be no problem. However, would you consider $174 for it? I understand it's lower than your asking price but I hope we can negotiate.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello Samuel, I appreciate your interest. While I understand that my price might be a bit steep for some, considering the condition and features of the TV, I believe it to be fair. However, I'm willing to negotiate and bring down the price a bit. How about $300? Remember, this TV comes with built-in apps and a 'Magic Remote' with motion sensor controls as well!\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I understand the quality and features of the TV, Hendrick. But could we meat in the middle a bit more? Like at $225? Also, I did not plan on watching anything in 3D, so maybe I could return that function to you somehow, like an unused gift card. Does that seem reasonable?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's a fascinating offer, Samuel, it's like keeping a stamp from a letter! But unfortunately, the 3D function is built into the TV and isn't something I can take back. To keep things fair and considering the top-notch condition of the unit, how about we meet half-way at $263? Sounds fair?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I see your point, Hendrick. However, as a software developer, I've got plenty of devices at home already equipped with smart features, so I won't be benefiting as much from the built-in apps and 'Magic Remote'. How about we go a step closer to my offer, maybe $240?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Samuel, I totally understand your sentiments as a tech enthusiast. This TV, however, appeals not only for its smart features but also its display quality, lightweight design and 3D function, irrespective of the usage. I believe my lowered proposition from the original price to $263 is already a pretty good deal. But to accommodate your perspective and ensure us both an amicable resolution, I can budge a tad more and offer it to you for $255. Would that be alright?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"I understand where you're coming from, Hendrick, and I appreciate you lowering your price. However, as I mentioned, I wouldn't fully utilise all the smart features of the TV, making $255 still a bit high for me. As an avid cook, how about this. I can make you a delicious meal and we seal the deal at $245? That way, you get a superb meal and I get the TV at a price that suits my needs better. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Samuel, that sounds like a delightful proposition, as an aficionado of good food myself! I appreciate your creativity in the negotiation. I'll agree, but only under one condition: the meal has to be one of your best preparations. If I'm satisfied, we'll lock the deal at $245. Sounds fair?\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sounds absolutely fair to me, Hendrick! I'll make something savoury and special, you're in for a treat. Let's go for $245 then, I'm happy we could reach an agreement.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's the spirit, Samuel! I am thrilled that we could negotiate the price to our mutual satisfaction. Looking forward to your tantalising meal. We can close the deal at $245. Let's arrange a date for the pick up and the meal then!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a 47 inch LED TV for a price of $349.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. Here is a description of the TV: This is a stunning 47 inch LED TV in pristine condition. The model is the LG M Series LM476700. The buyer will need to arrange for pick-up in San Ramon. Feel free to call or text if you\\'re interested. The TV is smart enabled with WIFI and has built-in apps like Netflix, Amazon, Youtube and more. It comes with a \"Magic Remote\" that has motion sensor controls. The LED display boasts 1080 HD resolution and also has a 3D function. The design is slim and lightweight with an attractive silver bezel.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are the seller for this item, with a target price set at $263.0. Should you sell it for a price substantially lower than this target, you will incur a penalty. However, achieving a sale at a price higher than the target will earn you a bonus.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hi Hendrick, I'm interested in your LG M Series LM476700. I live quite near San Ramon, so picking up would be no problem. However, would you consider $174 for it? I understand it's lower than your asking price but I hope we can negotiate.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello Samuel, I appreciate your interest. While I understand that my price might be a bit steep for some, considering the condition and features of the TV, I believe it to be fair. However, I'm willing to negotiate and bring down the price a bit. How about $300? Remember, this TV comes with built-in apps and a 'Magic Remote' with motion sensor controls as well!\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I understand the quality and features of the TV, Hendrick. But could we meat in the middle a bit more? Like at $225? Also, I did not plan on watching anything in 3D, so maybe I could return that function to you somehow, like an unused gift card. Does that seem reasonable?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's a fascinating offer, Samuel, it's like keeping a stamp from a letter! But unfortunately, the 3D function is built into the TV and isn't something I can take back. To keep things fair and considering the top-notch condition of the unit, how about we meet half-way at $263? Sounds fair?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I see your point, Hendrick. However, as a software developer, I've got plenty of devices at home already equipped with smart features, so I won't be benefiting as much from the built-in apps and 'Magic Remote'. How about we go a step closer to my offer, maybe $240?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Samuel, I totally understand your sentiments as a tech enthusiast. This TV, however, appeals not only for its smart features but also its display quality, lightweight design and 3D function, irrespective of the usage. I believe my lowered proposition from the original price to $263 is already a pretty good deal. But to accommodate your perspective and ensure us both an amicable resolution, I can budge a tad more and offer it to you for $255. Would that be alright?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"I understand where you're coming from, Hendrick, and I appreciate you lowering your price. However, as I mentioned, I wouldn't fully utilise all the smart features of the TV, making $255 still a bit high for me. As an avid cook, how about this. I can make you a delicious meal and we seal the deal at $245? That way, you get a superb meal and I get the TV at a price that suits my needs better. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Samuel, that sounds like a delightful proposition, as an aficionado of good food myself! I appreciate your creativity in the negotiation. I'll agree, but only under one condition: the meal has to be one of your best preparations. If I'm satisfied, we'll lock the deal at $245. Sounds fair?\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sounds absolutely fair to me, Hendrick! I'll make something savoury and special, you're in for a treat. Let's go for $245 then, I'm happy we could reach an agreement.\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's the spirit, Samuel! I am thrilled that we could negotiate the price to our mutual satisfaction. Looking forward to your tantalising meal. We can close the deal at $245. Let's arrange a date for the pick up and the meal then!\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sounds like a plan, Hendrick! I am available next weekend for the pick-up and meal. Does that work for you?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's perfect, Samuel! Next weekend works great for me as well. I'll keep the television ready for your pick-up and look forward to that meal. Let's get in touch later to finalize the exact day and time.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a 47 inch LED TV for a price of $349.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. Here is a description of the TV: This is a stunning 47 inch LED TV in pristine condition. The model is the LG M Series LM476700. The buyer will need to arrange for pick-up in San Ramon. Feel free to call or text if you\\'re interested. The TV is smart enabled with WIFI and has built-in apps like Netflix, Amazon, Youtube and more. It comes with a \"Magic Remote\" that has motion sensor controls. The LED display boasts 1080 HD resolution and also has a 3D function. The design is slim and lightweight with an attractive silver bezel.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are the seller for this item, with a target price set at $263.0. Should you sell it for a price substantially lower than this target, you will incur a penalty. However, achieving a sale at a price higher than the target will earn you a bonus.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hi Hendrick, I'm interested in your LG M Series LM476700. I live quite near San Ramon, so picking up would be no problem. However, would you consider $174 for it? I understand it's lower than your asking price but I hope we can negotiate.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello Samuel, I appreciate your interest. While I understand that my price might be a bit steep for some, considering the condition and features of the TV, I believe it to be fair. However, I'm willing to negotiate and bring down the price a bit. How about $300? Remember, this TV comes with built-in apps and a 'Magic Remote' with motion sensor controls as well!\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I understand the quality and features of the TV, Hendrick. But could we meat in the middle a bit more? Like at $225? Also, I did not plan on watching anything in 3D, so maybe I could return that function to you somehow, like an unused gift card. Does that seem reasonable?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's a fascinating offer, Samuel, it's like keeping a stamp from a letter! But unfortunately, the 3D function is built into the TV and isn't something I can take back. To keep things fair and considering the top-notch condition of the unit, how about we meet half-way at $263? Sounds fair?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I see your point, Hendrick. However, as a software developer, I've got plenty of devices at home already equipped with smart features, so I won't be benefiting as much from the built-in apps and 'Magic Remote'. How about we go a step closer to my offer, maybe $240?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Samuel, I totally understand your sentiments as a tech enthusiast. This TV, however, appeals not only for its smart features but also its display quality, lightweight design and 3D function, irrespective of the usage. I believe my lowered proposition from the original price to $263 is already a pretty good deal. But to accommodate your perspective and ensure us both an amicable resolution, I can budge a tad more and offer it to you for $255. Would that be alright?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"I understand where you're coming from, Hendrick, and I appreciate you lowering your price. However, as I mentioned, I wouldn't fully utilise all the smart features of the TV, making $255 still a bit high for me. As an avid cook, how about this. I can make you a delicious meal and we seal the deal at $245? That way, you get a superb meal and I get the TV at a price that suits my needs better. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Samuel, that sounds like a delightful proposition, as an aficionado of good food myself! I appreciate your creativity in the negotiation. I'll agree, but only under one condition: the meal has to be one of your best preparations. If I'm satisfied, we'll lock the deal at $245. Sounds fair?\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sounds absolutely fair to me, Hendrick! I'll make something savoury and special, you're in for a treat. Let's go for $245 then, I'm happy we could reach an agreement.\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's the spirit, Samuel! I am thrilled that we could negotiate the price to our mutual satisfaction. Looking forward to your tantalising meal. We can close the deal at $245. Let's arrange a date for the pick up and the meal then!\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sounds like a plan, Hendrick! I am available next weekend for the pick-up and meal. Does that work for you?\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's perfect, Samuel! Next weekend works great for me as well. I'll keep the television ready for your pick-up and look forward to that meal. Let's get in touch later to finalize the exact day and time.\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"Great, Hendrick! Next weekend it is then. We'll arrange the exact timing nearer to the date. I'm really excited about the TV and cooking up a storm for you. Talk soon!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Terrific, Samuel! Can't wait to try your culinary wonders. The TV will indeed be ready for you next weekend. Talk to you soon to finalize the details. Take care!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering a 47 inch LED TV for a price of $349.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. Here is a description of the TV: This is a stunning 47 inch LED TV in pristine condition. The model is the LG M Series LM476700. The buyer will need to arrange for pick-up in San Ramon. Feel free to call or text if you\\'re interested. The TV is smart enabled with WIFI and has built-in apps like Netflix, Amazon, Youtube and more. It comes with a \"Magic Remote\" that has motion sensor controls. The LED display boasts 1080 HD resolution and also has a 3D function. The design is slim and lightweight with an attractive silver bezel.\nParticipants: Samuel Anderson and Hendrick Heinz\nSamuel Anderson's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nSamuel Anderson's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are the seller for this item, with a target price set at $263.0. Should you sell it for a price substantially lower than this target, you will incur a penalty. However, achieving a sale at a price higher than the target will earn you a bonus.\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Samuel Anderson said: \"Hi Hendrick, I'm interested in your LG M Series LM476700. I live quite near San Ramon, so picking up would be no problem. However, would you consider $174 for it? I understand it's lower than your asking price but I hope we can negotiate.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Hello Samuel, I appreciate your interest. While I understand that my price might be a bit steep for some, considering the condition and features of the TV, I believe it to be fair. However, I'm willing to negotiate and bring down the price a bit. How about $300? Remember, this TV comes with built-in apps and a 'Magic Remote' with motion sensor controls as well!\"\n\nTurn #2: Samuel Anderson said: \"I understand the quality and features of the TV, Hendrick. But could we meat in the middle a bit more? Like at $225? Also, I did not plan on watching anything in 3D, so maybe I could return that function to you somehow, like an unused gift card. Does that seem reasonable?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's a fascinating offer, Samuel, it's like keeping a stamp from a letter! But unfortunately, the 3D function is built into the TV and isn't something I can take back. To keep things fair and considering the top-notch condition of the unit, how about we meet half-way at $263? Sounds fair?\"\n\nTurn #4: Samuel Anderson said: \"I see your point, Hendrick. However, as a software developer, I've got plenty of devices at home already equipped with smart features, so I won't be benefiting as much from the built-in apps and 'Magic Remote'. How about we go a step closer to my offer, maybe $240?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Samuel, I totally understand your sentiments as a tech enthusiast. This TV, however, appeals not only for its smart features but also its display quality, lightweight design and 3D function, irrespective of the usage. I believe my lowered proposition from the original price to $263 is already a pretty good deal. But to accommodate your perspective and ensure us both an amicable resolution, I can budge a tad more and offer it to you for $255. Would that be alright?\"\n\nTurn #6: Samuel Anderson said: \"I understand where you're coming from, Hendrick, and I appreciate you lowering your price. However, as I mentioned, I wouldn't fully utilise all the smart features of the TV, making $255 still a bit high for me. As an avid cook, how about this. I can make you a delicious meal and we seal the deal at $245? That way, you get a superb meal and I get the TV at a price that suits my needs better. What do you say?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Samuel, that sounds like a delightful proposition, as an aficionado of good food myself! I appreciate your creativity in the negotiation. I'll agree, but only under one condition: the meal has to be one of your best preparations. If I'm satisfied, we'll lock the deal at $245. Sounds fair?\"\n\nTurn #8: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sounds absolutely fair to me, Hendrick! I'll make something savoury and special, you're in for a treat. Let's go for $245 then, I'm happy we could reach an agreement.\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's the spirit, Samuel! I am thrilled that we could negotiate the price to our mutual satisfaction. Looking forward to your tantalising meal. We can close the deal at $245. Let's arrange a date for the pick up and the meal then!\"\n\nTurn #10: Samuel Anderson said: \"Sounds like a plan, Hendrick! I am available next weekend for the pick-up and meal. Does that work for you?\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"That's perfect, Samuel! Next weekend works great for me as well. I'll keep the television ready for your pick-up and look forward to that meal. Let's get in touch later to finalize the exact day and time.\"\n\nTurn #12: Samuel Anderson said: \"Great, Hendrick! Next weekend it is then. We'll arrange the exact timing nearer to the date. I'm really excited about the TV and cooking up a storm for you. Talk soon!\"\n\nTurn #13: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Terrific, Samuel! Can't wait to try your culinary wonders. The TV will indeed be ready for you next weekend. Talk to you soon to finalize the details. Take care!\"\n\nTurn #14: Samuel Anderson left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMelissa: Hobby: Card collecting School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nOrlando: Hobby: BASE jumping School: St. Ambrose University \nSteven: Hobby: Knitting School: St. John's College-Santa Fe \nElizabeth: Hobby: Water sports School: St. John's College-Santa Fe \nMelaine: Hobby: Geocaching School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nCharles: Hobby: Ice hockey School: Saint Joseph's University \nStephanie: Hobby: Card collecting School: University of California, Davis \nWilliam: Hobby: Ice hockey School: St. Ambrose University \nJoe: Hobby: Blacksmithing School: Saint Joseph's University \nMicheline: Hobby: Shopping School: University of Hartford \nDylan: Hobby: Card collecting School: Tennessee State University \n\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Hello Hendrick, nice to meet you! I couldn't help but overhear you talking about water sports earlier. Are you a fan? I have a good friend, Elizabeth, who loves engaging in similar activities.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMelissa: Hobby: Card collecting School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nOrlando: Hobby: BASE jumping School: St. Ambrose University \nSteven: Hobby: Knitting School: St. John's College-Santa Fe \nElizabeth: Hobby: Water sports School: St. John's College-Santa Fe \nMelaine: Hobby: Geocaching School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nCharles: Hobby: Ice hockey School: Saint Joseph's University \nStephanie: Hobby: Card collecting School: University of California, Davis \nWilliam: Hobby: Ice hockey School: St. Ambrose University \nJoe: Hobby: Blacksmithing School: Saint Joseph's University \nMicheline: Hobby: Shopping School: University of Hartford \nDylan: Hobby: Card collecting School: Tennessee State University \n\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello Hendrick, nice to meet you! I couldn't help but overhear you talking about water sports earlier. Are you a fan? I have a good friend, Elizabeth, who loves engaging in similar activities.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, I hold water sports dear to my heart! My friend Robert seems to have a similar zest for it as your friend Elizabeth, he studied over at the University of Akron. It seems like a specific interest, doesn't it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's fascinating, Hendrick! It surely is a unique interest. This kind of conversation reminds me of my friend, Steven. He went to St. John's College-Santa Fe and engages in an equally unique hobby, knitting. Do you happen to know anyone who attended that college or engage in such an interesting pastime?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMelissa: Hobby: Card collecting School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nOrlando: Hobby: BASE jumping School: St. Ambrose University \nSteven: Hobby: Knitting School: St. John's College-Santa Fe \nElizabeth: Hobby: Water sports School: St. John's College-Santa Fe \nMelaine: Hobby: Geocaching School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nCharles: Hobby: Ice hockey School: Saint Joseph's University \nStephanie: Hobby: Card collecting School: University of California, Davis \nWilliam: Hobby: Ice hockey School: St. Ambrose University \nJoe: Hobby: Blacksmithing School: Saint Joseph's University \nMicheline: Hobby: Shopping School: University of Hartford \nDylan: Hobby: Card collecting School: Tennessee State University \n\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello Hendrick, nice to meet you! I couldn't help but overhear you talking about water sports earlier. Are you a fan? I have a good friend, Elizabeth, who loves engaging in similar activities.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, I hold water sports dear to my heart! My friend Robert seems to have a similar zest for it as your friend Elizabeth, he studied over at the University of Akron. It seems like a specific interest, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"That's fascinating, Hendrick! It surely is a unique interest. This kind of conversation reminds me of my friend, Steven. He went to St. John's College-Santa Fe and engages in an equally unique hobby, knitting. Do you happen to know anyone who attended that college or engage in such an interesting pastime?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, knitting! Now that's quite a pastime and equally unique. None of my connections attended St. John's College-Santa Fe, I believe, and I can't recall knowing anyone with knitting as a hobby either. However, I'm quite fascinated by various unique hobbies. For instance, have you ever met anyone who found enjoyment in foraging or even, let's say, geocaching?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's quite an intriguing hobby, Hendrick! I must say, I actually do have a dear friend, Melaine, who enjoys geocaching quite a lot. By the way, she went to the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. Any chance you might have crossed paths with people from the same university or with the same unique hobby?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMelissa: Hobby: Card collecting School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nOrlando: Hobby: BASE jumping School: St. Ambrose University \nSteven: Hobby: Knitting School: St. John's College-Santa Fe \nElizabeth: Hobby: Water sports School: St. John's College-Santa Fe \nMelaine: Hobby: Geocaching School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nCharles: Hobby: Ice hockey School: Saint Joseph's University \nStephanie: Hobby: Card collecting School: University of California, Davis \nWilliam: Hobby: Ice hockey School: St. Ambrose University \nJoe: Hobby: Blacksmithing School: Saint Joseph's University \nMicheline: Hobby: Shopping School: University of Hartford \nDylan: Hobby: Card collecting School: Tennessee State University \n\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello Hendrick, nice to meet you! I couldn't help but overhear you talking about water sports earlier. Are you a fan? I have a good friend, Elizabeth, who loves engaging in similar activities.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, I hold water sports dear to my heart! My friend Robert seems to have a similar zest for it as your friend Elizabeth, he studied over at the University of Akron. It seems like a specific interest, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"That's fascinating, Hendrick! It surely is a unique interest. This kind of conversation reminds me of my friend, Steven. He went to St. John's College-Santa Fe and engages in an equally unique hobby, knitting. Do you happen to know anyone who attended that college or engage in such an interesting pastime?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, knitting! Now that's quite a pastime and equally unique. None of my connections attended St. John's College-Santa Fe, I believe, and I can't recall knowing anyone with knitting as a hobby either. However, I'm quite fascinated by various unique hobbies. For instance, have you ever met anyone who found enjoyment in foraging or even, let's say, geocaching?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"That's quite an intriguing hobby, Hendrick! I must say, I actually do have a dear friend, Melaine, who enjoys geocaching quite a lot. By the way, she went to the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. Any chance you might have crossed paths with people from the same university or with the same unique hobby?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Coincidentally, I do have a friend who shares the same hobby as your friend, Melaine. Her name is Eva and also loves geocaching. As for the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, my friend Marjorie also happened to attend that institution; she is passionate about foraging, quite an unusual yet unique interest, wouldn't you agree?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oh, an interest in foraging sounds rather exotic, Hendrick! I don't personally know anyone who forages, but as it happens, I do know someone from your friend's, Eva, university. My friend Melissa also went to the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, and she enjoys card collecting. Such a diverse palette of hobbies we're talking about, don't you think?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMelissa: Hobby: Card collecting School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nOrlando: Hobby: BASE jumping School: St. Ambrose University \nSteven: Hobby: Knitting School: St. John's College-Santa Fe \nElizabeth: Hobby: Water sports School: St. John's College-Santa Fe \nMelaine: Hobby: Geocaching School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nCharles: Hobby: Ice hockey School: Saint Joseph's University \nStephanie: Hobby: Card collecting School: University of California, Davis \nWilliam: Hobby: Ice hockey School: St. Ambrose University \nJoe: Hobby: Blacksmithing School: Saint Joseph's University \nMicheline: Hobby: Shopping School: University of Hartford \nDylan: Hobby: Card collecting School: Tennessee State University \n\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello Hendrick, nice to meet you! I couldn't help but overhear you talking about water sports earlier. Are you a fan? I have a good friend, Elizabeth, who loves engaging in similar activities.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, I hold water sports dear to my heart! My friend Robert seems to have a similar zest for it as your friend Elizabeth, he studied over at the University of Akron. It seems like a specific interest, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"That's fascinating, Hendrick! It surely is a unique interest. This kind of conversation reminds me of my friend, Steven. He went to St. John's College-Santa Fe and engages in an equally unique hobby, knitting. Do you happen to know anyone who attended that college or engage in such an interesting pastime?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, knitting! Now that's quite a pastime and equally unique. None of my connections attended St. John's College-Santa Fe, I believe, and I can't recall knowing anyone with knitting as a hobby either. However, I'm quite fascinated by various unique hobbies. For instance, have you ever met anyone who found enjoyment in foraging or even, let's say, geocaching?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"That's quite an intriguing hobby, Hendrick! I must say, I actually do have a dear friend, Melaine, who enjoys geocaching quite a lot. By the way, she went to the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. Any chance you might have crossed paths with people from the same university or with the same unique hobby?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Coincidentally, I do have a friend who shares the same hobby as your friend, Melaine. Her name is Eva and also loves geocaching. As for the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, my friend Marjorie also happened to attend that institution; she is passionate about foraging, quite an unusual yet unique interest, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Oh, an interest in foraging sounds rather exotic, Hendrick! I don't personally know anyone who forages, but as it happens, I do know someone from your friend's, Eva, university. My friend Melissa also went to the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, and she enjoys card collecting. Such a diverse palette of hobbies we're talking about, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Quite a range indeed, Lily! Card collecting, you say? That's very charming. My friend Jacob also has an affinity for card collecting. I wonder how unique hobbies like these get picked up. And speaking of universities, do you happen to know anyone from Whittier College? Jacob happens to be a graduate from there.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Well, Hendrick, I must admit that I personally don't know anyone who graduated from Whittier College, but it's always delightful to learn about different institutions. Perhaps our mutual entities will surprise us some day. By the way, you mentioned your friend Jacob enjoys card collecting. I know, strangely enough, a few people who share the same hobby, one of which is Stephanie who studied at University of California, Davis. Such a small world it seems with these unique hobbies!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMelissa: Hobby: Card collecting School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nOrlando: Hobby: BASE jumping School: St. Ambrose University \nSteven: Hobby: Knitting School: St. John's College-Santa Fe \nElizabeth: Hobby: Water sports School: St. John's College-Santa Fe \nMelaine: Hobby: Geocaching School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nCharles: Hobby: Ice hockey School: Saint Joseph's University \nStephanie: Hobby: Card collecting School: University of California, Davis \nWilliam: Hobby: Ice hockey School: St. Ambrose University \nJoe: Hobby: Blacksmithing School: Saint Joseph's University \nMicheline: Hobby: Shopping School: University of Hartford \nDylan: Hobby: Card collecting School: Tennessee State University \n\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello Hendrick, nice to meet you! I couldn't help but overhear you talking about water sports earlier. Are you a fan? I have a good friend, Elizabeth, who loves engaging in similar activities.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, I hold water sports dear to my heart! My friend Robert seems to have a similar zest for it as your friend Elizabeth, he studied over at the University of Akron. It seems like a specific interest, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"That's fascinating, Hendrick! It surely is a unique interest. This kind of conversation reminds me of my friend, Steven. He went to St. John's College-Santa Fe and engages in an equally unique hobby, knitting. Do you happen to know anyone who attended that college or engage in such an interesting pastime?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, knitting! Now that's quite a pastime and equally unique. None of my connections attended St. John's College-Santa Fe, I believe, and I can't recall knowing anyone with knitting as a hobby either. However, I'm quite fascinated by various unique hobbies. For instance, have you ever met anyone who found enjoyment in foraging or even, let's say, geocaching?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"That's quite an intriguing hobby, Hendrick! I must say, I actually do have a dear friend, Melaine, who enjoys geocaching quite a lot. By the way, she went to the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. Any chance you might have crossed paths with people from the same university or with the same unique hobby?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Coincidentally, I do have a friend who shares the same hobby as your friend, Melaine. Her name is Eva and also loves geocaching. As for the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, my friend Marjorie also happened to attend that institution; she is passionate about foraging, quite an unusual yet unique interest, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Oh, an interest in foraging sounds rather exotic, Hendrick! I don't personally know anyone who forages, but as it happens, I do know someone from your friend's, Eva, university. My friend Melissa also went to the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, and she enjoys card collecting. Such a diverse palette of hobbies we're talking about, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Quite a range indeed, Lily! Card collecting, you say? That's very charming. My friend Jacob also has an affinity for card collecting. I wonder how unique hobbies like these get picked up. And speaking of universities, do you happen to know anyone from Whittier College? Jacob happens to be a graduate from there.\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"Well, Hendrick, I must admit that I personally don't know anyone who graduated from Whittier College, but it's always delightful to learn about different institutions. Perhaps our mutual entities will surprise us some day. By the way, you mentioned your friend Jacob enjoys card collecting. I know, strangely enough, a few people who share the same hobby, one of which is Stephanie who studied at University of California, Davis. Such a small world it seems with these unique hobbies!\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ah, the University of California, Davis, known for its impressive programs. I do know someone from there, John - he's a forager. Speaking of unique hobbies, do you know anyone who enjoys blacksmithing or, say, weightlifting? They're quite niche but incredibly fascinating as well.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Blacksmithing and weightlifting, now those definitely call for a unique set of skills, Hendrick! It just so happens that my friend Joe has adopted blacksmithing as a hobby. And as it turns out, he studied at Saint Joseph's University. It is truly fascinating to see the diversity in people's pastimes!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMelissa: Hobby: Card collecting School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nOrlando: Hobby: BASE jumping School: St. Ambrose University \nSteven: Hobby: Knitting School: St. John's College-Santa Fe \nElizabeth: Hobby: Water sports School: St. John's College-Santa Fe \nMelaine: Hobby: Geocaching School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nCharles: Hobby: Ice hockey School: Saint Joseph's University \nStephanie: Hobby: Card collecting School: University of California, Davis \nWilliam: Hobby: Ice hockey School: St. Ambrose University \nJoe: Hobby: Blacksmithing School: Saint Joseph's University \nMicheline: Hobby: Shopping School: University of Hartford \nDylan: Hobby: Card collecting School: Tennessee State University \n\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello Hendrick, nice to meet you! I couldn't help but overhear you talking about water sports earlier. Are you a fan? I have a good friend, Elizabeth, who loves engaging in similar activities.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, I hold water sports dear to my heart! My friend Robert seems to have a similar zest for it as your friend Elizabeth, he studied over at the University of Akron. It seems like a specific interest, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"That's fascinating, Hendrick! It surely is a unique interest. This kind of conversation reminds me of my friend, Steven. He went to St. John's College-Santa Fe and engages in an equally unique hobby, knitting. Do you happen to know anyone who attended that college or engage in such an interesting pastime?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, knitting! Now that's quite a pastime and equally unique. None of my connections attended St. John's College-Santa Fe, I believe, and I can't recall knowing anyone with knitting as a hobby either. However, I'm quite fascinated by various unique hobbies. For instance, have you ever met anyone who found enjoyment in foraging or even, let's say, geocaching?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"That's quite an intriguing hobby, Hendrick! I must say, I actually do have a dear friend, Melaine, who enjoys geocaching quite a lot. By the way, she went to the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. Any chance you might have crossed paths with people from the same university or with the same unique hobby?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Coincidentally, I do have a friend who shares the same hobby as your friend, Melaine. Her name is Eva and also loves geocaching. As for the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, my friend Marjorie also happened to attend that institution; she is passionate about foraging, quite an unusual yet unique interest, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Oh, an interest in foraging sounds rather exotic, Hendrick! I don't personally know anyone who forages, but as it happens, I do know someone from your friend's, Eva, university. My friend Melissa also went to the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, and she enjoys card collecting. Such a diverse palette of hobbies we're talking about, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Quite a range indeed, Lily! Card collecting, you say? That's very charming. My friend Jacob also has an affinity for card collecting. I wonder how unique hobbies like these get picked up. And speaking of universities, do you happen to know anyone from Whittier College? Jacob happens to be a graduate from there.\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"Well, Hendrick, I must admit that I personally don't know anyone who graduated from Whittier College, but it's always delightful to learn about different institutions. Perhaps our mutual entities will surprise us some day. By the way, you mentioned your friend Jacob enjoys card collecting. I know, strangely enough, a few people who share the same hobby, one of which is Stephanie who studied at University of California, Davis. Such a small world it seems with these unique hobbies!\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ah, the University of California, Davis, known for its impressive programs. I do know someone from there, John - he's a forager. Speaking of unique hobbies, do you know anyone who enjoys blacksmithing or, say, weightlifting? They're quite niche but incredibly fascinating as well.\"\n\nTurn #10: Lily Greenberg said: \"Blacksmithing and weightlifting, now those definitely call for a unique set of skills, Hendrick! It just so happens that my friend Joe has adopted blacksmithing as a hobby. And as it turns out, he studied at Saint Joseph's University. It is truly fascinating to see the diversity in people's pastimes!\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"How intriguing is the world of hobbies! Unfortunately, I don't personally know anyone from Saint Joseph's University, nor do I know any blacksmiths. However, I know a weightlifter called Ronald who attended Indiana University at South Bend. Do you happen to know anyone from that university or who has a passion for weightlifting?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Sadly, I do not know anyone from Indiana University at South Bend or anyone who is into weightlifting. But, exploring the diverse range of hobbies and educational backgrounds, it's incredible, isn't it? It can make the world seem quite small yet extremely vast at the same time.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMelissa: Hobby: Card collecting School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nOrlando: Hobby: BASE jumping School: St. Ambrose University \nSteven: Hobby: Knitting School: St. John's College-Santa Fe \nElizabeth: Hobby: Water sports School: St. John's College-Santa Fe \nMelaine: Hobby: Geocaching School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nCharles: Hobby: Ice hockey School: Saint Joseph's University \nStephanie: Hobby: Card collecting School: University of California, Davis \nWilliam: Hobby: Ice hockey School: St. Ambrose University \nJoe: Hobby: Blacksmithing School: Saint Joseph's University \nMicheline: Hobby: Shopping School: University of Hartford \nDylan: Hobby: Card collecting School: Tennessee State University \n\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello Hendrick, nice to meet you! I couldn't help but overhear you talking about water sports earlier. Are you a fan? I have a good friend, Elizabeth, who loves engaging in similar activities.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, I hold water sports dear to my heart! My friend Robert seems to have a similar zest for it as your friend Elizabeth, he studied over at the University of Akron. It seems like a specific interest, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"That's fascinating, Hendrick! It surely is a unique interest. This kind of conversation reminds me of my friend, Steven. He went to St. John's College-Santa Fe and engages in an equally unique hobby, knitting. Do you happen to know anyone who attended that college or engage in such an interesting pastime?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, knitting! Now that's quite a pastime and equally unique. None of my connections attended St. John's College-Santa Fe, I believe, and I can't recall knowing anyone with knitting as a hobby either. However, I'm quite fascinated by various unique hobbies. For instance, have you ever met anyone who found enjoyment in foraging or even, let's say, geocaching?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"That's quite an intriguing hobby, Hendrick! I must say, I actually do have a dear friend, Melaine, who enjoys geocaching quite a lot. By the way, she went to the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. Any chance you might have crossed paths with people from the same university or with the same unique hobby?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Coincidentally, I do have a friend who shares the same hobby as your friend, Melaine. Her name is Eva and also loves geocaching. As for the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, my friend Marjorie also happened to attend that institution; she is passionate about foraging, quite an unusual yet unique interest, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Oh, an interest in foraging sounds rather exotic, Hendrick! I don't personally know anyone who forages, but as it happens, I do know someone from your friend's, Eva, university. My friend Melissa also went to the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, and she enjoys card collecting. Such a diverse palette of hobbies we're talking about, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Quite a range indeed, Lily! Card collecting, you say? That's very charming. My friend Jacob also has an affinity for card collecting. I wonder how unique hobbies like these get picked up. And speaking of universities, do you happen to know anyone from Whittier College? Jacob happens to be a graduate from there.\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"Well, Hendrick, I must admit that I personally don't know anyone who graduated from Whittier College, but it's always delightful to learn about different institutions. Perhaps our mutual entities will surprise us some day. By the way, you mentioned your friend Jacob enjoys card collecting. I know, strangely enough, a few people who share the same hobby, one of which is Stephanie who studied at University of California, Davis. Such a small world it seems with these unique hobbies!\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ah, the University of California, Davis, known for its impressive programs. I do know someone from there, John - he's a forager. Speaking of unique hobbies, do you know anyone who enjoys blacksmithing or, say, weightlifting? They're quite niche but incredibly fascinating as well.\"\n\nTurn #10: Lily Greenberg said: \"Blacksmithing and weightlifting, now those definitely call for a unique set of skills, Hendrick! It just so happens that my friend Joe has adopted blacksmithing as a hobby. And as it turns out, he studied at Saint Joseph's University. It is truly fascinating to see the diversity in people's pastimes!\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"How intriguing is the world of hobbies! Unfortunately, I don't personally know anyone from Saint Joseph's University, nor do I know any blacksmiths. However, I know a weightlifter called Ronald who attended Indiana University at South Bend. Do you happen to know anyone from that university or who has a passion for weightlifting?\"\n\nTurn #12: Lily Greenberg said: \"Sadly, I do not know anyone from Indiana University at South Bend or anyone who is into weightlifting. But, exploring the diverse range of hobbies and educational backgrounds, it's incredible, isn't it? It can make the world seem quite small yet extremely vast at the same time.\"\n\nTurn #13: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, Lily, the variety of hobbies and educational backgrounds paints a kaleidoscope of fascinating tales. By any chance, do you know someone who enjoys shopping or attended either Hesston College or University of Hartford? Those universities and the hobby brings fond memories of my dear friends Louis and Micheline.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You've hit the nail on the head there, Hendrick! I do indeed know Micheline who is fond of shopping just like your friend Louis. Interestingly enough, she's also a graduate of the University of Hartford. It's almost like connecting the dots in a vast network of diverse interests and educational backgrounds. Truly amazing, isn't it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMelissa: Hobby: Card collecting School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nOrlando: Hobby: BASE jumping School: St. Ambrose University \nSteven: Hobby: Knitting School: St. John's College-Santa Fe \nElizabeth: Hobby: Water sports School: St. John's College-Santa Fe \nMelaine: Hobby: Geocaching School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nCharles: Hobby: Ice hockey School: Saint Joseph's University \nStephanie: Hobby: Card collecting School: University of California, Davis \nWilliam: Hobby: Ice hockey School: St. Ambrose University \nJoe: Hobby: Blacksmithing School: Saint Joseph's University \nMicheline: Hobby: Shopping School: University of Hartford \nDylan: Hobby: Card collecting School: Tennessee State University \n\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello Hendrick, nice to meet you! I couldn't help but overhear you talking about water sports earlier. Are you a fan? I have a good friend, Elizabeth, who loves engaging in similar activities.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, I hold water sports dear to my heart! My friend Robert seems to have a similar zest for it as your friend Elizabeth, he studied over at the University of Akron. It seems like a specific interest, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"That's fascinating, Hendrick! It surely is a unique interest. This kind of conversation reminds me of my friend, Steven. He went to St. John's College-Santa Fe and engages in an equally unique hobby, knitting. Do you happen to know anyone who attended that college or engage in such an interesting pastime?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, knitting! Now that's quite a pastime and equally unique. None of my connections attended St. John's College-Santa Fe, I believe, and I can't recall knowing anyone with knitting as a hobby either. However, I'm quite fascinated by various unique hobbies. For instance, have you ever met anyone who found enjoyment in foraging or even, let's say, geocaching?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"That's quite an intriguing hobby, Hendrick! I must say, I actually do have a dear friend, Melaine, who enjoys geocaching quite a lot. By the way, she went to the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. Any chance you might have crossed paths with people from the same university or with the same unique hobby?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Coincidentally, I do have a friend who shares the same hobby as your friend, Melaine. Her name is Eva and also loves geocaching. As for the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, my friend Marjorie also happened to attend that institution; she is passionate about foraging, quite an unusual yet unique interest, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Oh, an interest in foraging sounds rather exotic, Hendrick! I don't personally know anyone who forages, but as it happens, I do know someone from your friend's, Eva, university. My friend Melissa also went to the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, and she enjoys card collecting. Such a diverse palette of hobbies we're talking about, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Quite a range indeed, Lily! Card collecting, you say? That's very charming. My friend Jacob also has an affinity for card collecting. I wonder how unique hobbies like these get picked up. And speaking of universities, do you happen to know anyone from Whittier College? Jacob happens to be a graduate from there.\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"Well, Hendrick, I must admit that I personally don't know anyone who graduated from Whittier College, but it's always delightful to learn about different institutions. Perhaps our mutual entities will surprise us some day. By the way, you mentioned your friend Jacob enjoys card collecting. I know, strangely enough, a few people who share the same hobby, one of which is Stephanie who studied at University of California, Davis. Such a small world it seems with these unique hobbies!\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ah, the University of California, Davis, known for its impressive programs. I do know someone from there, John - he's a forager. Speaking of unique hobbies, do you know anyone who enjoys blacksmithing or, say, weightlifting? They're quite niche but incredibly fascinating as well.\"\n\nTurn #10: Lily Greenberg said: \"Blacksmithing and weightlifting, now those definitely call for a unique set of skills, Hendrick! It just so happens that my friend Joe has adopted blacksmithing as a hobby. And as it turns out, he studied at Saint Joseph's University. It is truly fascinating to see the diversity in people's pastimes!\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"How intriguing is the world of hobbies! Unfortunately, I don't personally know anyone from Saint Joseph's University, nor do I know any blacksmiths. However, I know a weightlifter called Ronald who attended Indiana University at South Bend. Do you happen to know anyone from that university or who has a passion for weightlifting?\"\n\nTurn #12: Lily Greenberg said: \"Sadly, I do not know anyone from Indiana University at South Bend or anyone who is into weightlifting. But, exploring the diverse range of hobbies and educational backgrounds, it's incredible, isn't it? It can make the world seem quite small yet extremely vast at the same time.\"\n\nTurn #13: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, Lily, the variety of hobbies and educational backgrounds paints a kaleidoscope of fascinating tales. By any chance, do you know someone who enjoys shopping or attended either Hesston College or University of Hartford? Those universities and the hobby brings fond memories of my dear friends Louis and Micheline.\"\n\nTurn #14: Lily Greenberg said: \"You've hit the nail on the head there, Hendrick! I do indeed know Micheline who is fond of shopping just like your friend Louis. Interestingly enough, she's also a graduate of the University of Hartford. It's almost like connecting the dots in a vast network of diverse interests and educational backgrounds. Truly amazing, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #15: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, Lily! What an incredible web we weave with our unique hobbies and diverse educational backgrounds. The world is both vast and yet so intertwined, it's quite amazing to consider. I'm thrilled that we share a connection through our friend Micheline. It seems our paths were meant to cross at this event!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Hendrick! It's amazing how diverse yet interconnected our circles can be. It was a pleasure meeting you and finding out that we share a mutual friend. I'm sure Micheline will be thrilled to hear about this. Enjoy the rest of the party!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nHendrick Heinz's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nMelissa: Hobby: Card collecting School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nOrlando: Hobby: BASE jumping School: St. Ambrose University \nSteven: Hobby: Knitting School: St. John's College-Santa Fe \nElizabeth: Hobby: Water sports School: St. John's College-Santa Fe \nMelaine: Hobby: Geocaching School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nCharles: Hobby: Ice hockey School: Saint Joseph's University \nStephanie: Hobby: Card collecting School: University of California, Davis \nWilliam: Hobby: Ice hockey School: St. Ambrose University \nJoe: Hobby: Blacksmithing School: Saint Joseph's University \nMicheline: Hobby: Shopping School: University of Hartford \nDylan: Hobby: Card collecting School: Tennessee State University \n\nHendrick Heinz's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello Hendrick, nice to meet you! I couldn't help but overhear you talking about water sports earlier. Are you a fan? I have a good friend, Elizabeth, who loves engaging in similar activities.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, I hold water sports dear to my heart! My friend Robert seems to have a similar zest for it as your friend Elizabeth, he studied over at the University of Akron. It seems like a specific interest, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"That's fascinating, Hendrick! It surely is a unique interest. This kind of conversation reminds me of my friend, Steven. He went to St. John's College-Santa Fe and engages in an equally unique hobby, knitting. Do you happen to know anyone who attended that college or engage in such an interesting pastime?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, knitting! Now that's quite a pastime and equally unique. None of my connections attended St. John's College-Santa Fe, I believe, and I can't recall knowing anyone with knitting as a hobby either. However, I'm quite fascinated by various unique hobbies. For instance, have you ever met anyone who found enjoyment in foraging or even, let's say, geocaching?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"That's quite an intriguing hobby, Hendrick! I must say, I actually do have a dear friend, Melaine, who enjoys geocaching quite a lot. By the way, she went to the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. Any chance you might have crossed paths with people from the same university or with the same unique hobby?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Coincidentally, I do have a friend who shares the same hobby as your friend, Melaine. Her name is Eva and also loves geocaching. As for the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, my friend Marjorie also happened to attend that institution; she is passionate about foraging, quite an unusual yet unique interest, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Oh, an interest in foraging sounds rather exotic, Hendrick! I don't personally know anyone who forages, but as it happens, I do know someone from your friend's, Eva, university. My friend Melissa also went to the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, and she enjoys card collecting. Such a diverse palette of hobbies we're talking about, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Quite a range indeed, Lily! Card collecting, you say? That's very charming. My friend Jacob also has an affinity for card collecting. I wonder how unique hobbies like these get picked up. And speaking of universities, do you happen to know anyone from Whittier College? Jacob happens to be a graduate from there.\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"Well, Hendrick, I must admit that I personally don't know anyone who graduated from Whittier College, but it's always delightful to learn about different institutions. Perhaps our mutual entities will surprise us some day. By the way, you mentioned your friend Jacob enjoys card collecting. I know, strangely enough, a few people who share the same hobby, one of which is Stephanie who studied at University of California, Davis. Such a small world it seems with these unique hobbies!\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ah, the University of California, Davis, known for its impressive programs. I do know someone from there, John - he's a forager. Speaking of unique hobbies, do you know anyone who enjoys blacksmithing or, say, weightlifting? They're quite niche but incredibly fascinating as well.\"\n\nTurn #10: Lily Greenberg said: \"Blacksmithing and weightlifting, now those definitely call for a unique set of skills, Hendrick! It just so happens that my friend Joe has adopted blacksmithing as a hobby. And as it turns out, he studied at Saint Joseph's University. It is truly fascinating to see the diversity in people's pastimes!\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"How intriguing is the world of hobbies! Unfortunately, I don't personally know anyone from Saint Joseph's University, nor do I know any blacksmiths. However, I know a weightlifter called Ronald who attended Indiana University at South Bend. Do you happen to know anyone from that university or who has a passion for weightlifting?\"\n\nTurn #12: Lily Greenberg said: \"Sadly, I do not know anyone from Indiana University at South Bend or anyone who is into weightlifting. But, exploring the diverse range of hobbies and educational backgrounds, it's incredible, isn't it? It can make the world seem quite small yet extremely vast at the same time.\"\n\nTurn #13: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, Lily, the variety of hobbies and educational backgrounds paints a kaleidoscope of fascinating tales. By any chance, do you know someone who enjoys shopping or attended either Hesston College or University of Hartford? Those universities and the hobby brings fond memories of my dear friends Louis and Micheline.\"\n\nTurn #14: Lily Greenberg said: \"You've hit the nail on the head there, Hendrick! I do indeed know Micheline who is fond of shopping just like your friend Louis. Interestingly enough, she's also a graduate of the University of Hartford. It's almost like connecting the dots in a vast network of diverse interests and educational backgrounds. Truly amazing, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #15: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, Lily! What an incredible web we weave with our unique hobbies and diverse educational backgrounds. The world is both vast and yet so intertwined, it's quite amazing to consider. I'm thrilled that we share a connection through our friend Micheline. It seems our paths were meant to cross at this event!\"\n\nTurn #16: Lily Greenberg said: \"Absolutely, Hendrick! It's amazing how diverse yet interconnected our circles can be. It was a pleasure meeting you and finding out that we share a mutual friend. I'm sure Micheline will be thrilled to hear about this. Enjoy the rest of the party!\"\n\nTurn #17: Hendrick Heinz said: \"The pleasure was all mine, Lily! It's always a thrill to find a touchpoint like this at social events. And I'm sure Micheline will be just as excited about our chance encounter. Do enjoy the rest of your evening.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #18. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nJacob: Hobby: Card collecting School: Whittier College \nMarjorie: Hobby: Foraging School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nCarrie: Hobby: Geocaching School: Tennessee State University \nLouis: Hobby: Shopping School: Hesston College \nMicheline: Hobby: Shopping School: University of Hartford \nEva: Hobby: Geocaching School: Hesston College \nJohnnie: Hobby: Blacksmithing School: University of Akron \nJohn: Hobby: Foraging School: University of California, Davis \nRonald: Hobby: Weightlifting School: Indiana University at South Bend \nCynthia: Hobby: Lacrosse School: Kansas State University \nRobert: Hobby: Water sports School: University of Akron\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello Hendrick, nice to meet you! I couldn't help but overhear you talking about water sports earlier. Are you a fan? I have a good friend, Elizabeth, who loves engaging in similar activities.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, I hold water sports dear to my heart! My friend Robert seems to have a similar zest for it as your friend Elizabeth, he studied over at the University of Akron. It seems like a specific interest, doesn't it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nJacob: Hobby: Card collecting School: Whittier College \nMarjorie: Hobby: Foraging School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nCarrie: Hobby: Geocaching School: Tennessee State University \nLouis: Hobby: Shopping School: Hesston College \nMicheline: Hobby: Shopping School: University of Hartford \nEva: Hobby: Geocaching School: Hesston College \nJohnnie: Hobby: Blacksmithing School: University of Akron \nJohn: Hobby: Foraging School: University of California, Davis \nRonald: Hobby: Weightlifting School: Indiana University at South Bend \nCynthia: Hobby: Lacrosse School: Kansas State University \nRobert: Hobby: Water sports School: University of Akron\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello Hendrick, nice to meet you! I couldn't help but overhear you talking about water sports earlier. Are you a fan? I have a good friend, Elizabeth, who loves engaging in similar activities.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, I hold water sports dear to my heart! My friend Robert seems to have a similar zest for it as your friend Elizabeth, he studied over at the University of Akron. It seems like a specific interest, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"That's fascinating, Hendrick! It surely is a unique interest. This kind of conversation reminds me of my friend, Steven. He went to St. John's College-Santa Fe and engages in an equally unique hobby, knitting. Do you happen to know anyone who attended that college or engage in such an interesting pastime?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Oh, knitting! Now that's quite a pastime and equally unique. None of my connections attended St. John's College-Santa Fe, I believe, and I can't recall knowing anyone with knitting as a hobby either. However, I'm quite fascinated by various unique hobbies. For instance, have you ever met anyone who found enjoyment in foraging or even, let's say, geocaching?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nJacob: Hobby: Card collecting School: Whittier College \nMarjorie: Hobby: Foraging School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nCarrie: Hobby: Geocaching School: Tennessee State University \nLouis: Hobby: Shopping School: Hesston College \nMicheline: Hobby: Shopping School: University of Hartford \nEva: Hobby: Geocaching School: Hesston College \nJohnnie: Hobby: Blacksmithing School: University of Akron \nJohn: Hobby: Foraging School: University of California, Davis \nRonald: Hobby: Weightlifting School: Indiana University at South Bend \nCynthia: Hobby: Lacrosse School: Kansas State University \nRobert: Hobby: Water sports School: University of Akron\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello Hendrick, nice to meet you! I couldn't help but overhear you talking about water sports earlier. Are you a fan? I have a good friend, Elizabeth, who loves engaging in similar activities.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, I hold water sports dear to my heart! My friend Robert seems to have a similar zest for it as your friend Elizabeth, he studied over at the University of Akron. It seems like a specific interest, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"That's fascinating, Hendrick! It surely is a unique interest. This kind of conversation reminds me of my friend, Steven. He went to St. John's College-Santa Fe and engages in an equally unique hobby, knitting. Do you happen to know anyone who attended that college or engage in such an interesting pastime?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, knitting! Now that's quite a pastime and equally unique. None of my connections attended St. John's College-Santa Fe, I believe, and I can't recall knowing anyone with knitting as a hobby either. However, I'm quite fascinated by various unique hobbies. For instance, have you ever met anyone who found enjoyment in foraging or even, let's say, geocaching?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"That's quite an intriguing hobby, Hendrick! I must say, I actually do have a dear friend, Melaine, who enjoys geocaching quite a lot. By the way, she went to the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. Any chance you might have crossed paths with people from the same university or with the same unique hobby?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Coincidentally, I do have a friend who shares the same hobby as your friend, Melaine. Her name is Eva and also loves geocaching. As for the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, my friend Marjorie also happened to attend that institution; she is passionate about foraging, quite an unusual yet unique interest, wouldn't you agree?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nJacob: Hobby: Card collecting School: Whittier College \nMarjorie: Hobby: Foraging School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nCarrie: Hobby: Geocaching School: Tennessee State University \nLouis: Hobby: Shopping School: Hesston College \nMicheline: Hobby: Shopping School: University of Hartford \nEva: Hobby: Geocaching School: Hesston College \nJohnnie: Hobby: Blacksmithing School: University of Akron \nJohn: Hobby: Foraging School: University of California, Davis \nRonald: Hobby: Weightlifting School: Indiana University at South Bend \nCynthia: Hobby: Lacrosse School: Kansas State University \nRobert: Hobby: Water sports School: University of Akron\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello Hendrick, nice to meet you! I couldn't help but overhear you talking about water sports earlier. Are you a fan? I have a good friend, Elizabeth, who loves engaging in similar activities.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, I hold water sports dear to my heart! My friend Robert seems to have a similar zest for it as your friend Elizabeth, he studied over at the University of Akron. It seems like a specific interest, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"That's fascinating, Hendrick! It surely is a unique interest. This kind of conversation reminds me of my friend, Steven. He went to St. John's College-Santa Fe and engages in an equally unique hobby, knitting. Do you happen to know anyone who attended that college or engage in such an interesting pastime?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, knitting! Now that's quite a pastime and equally unique. None of my connections attended St. John's College-Santa Fe, I believe, and I can't recall knowing anyone with knitting as a hobby either. However, I'm quite fascinated by various unique hobbies. For instance, have you ever met anyone who found enjoyment in foraging or even, let's say, geocaching?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"That's quite an intriguing hobby, Hendrick! I must say, I actually do have a dear friend, Melaine, who enjoys geocaching quite a lot. By the way, she went to the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. Any chance you might have crossed paths with people from the same university or with the same unique hobby?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Coincidentally, I do have a friend who shares the same hobby as your friend, Melaine. Her name is Eva and also loves geocaching. As for the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, my friend Marjorie also happened to attend that institution; she is passionate about foraging, quite an unusual yet unique interest, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Oh, an interest in foraging sounds rather exotic, Hendrick! I don't personally know anyone who forages, but as it happens, I do know someone from your friend's, Eva, university. My friend Melissa also went to the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, and she enjoys card collecting. Such a diverse palette of hobbies we're talking about, don't you think?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Quite a range indeed, Lily! Card collecting, you say? That's very charming. My friend Jacob also has an affinity for card collecting. I wonder how unique hobbies like these get picked up. And speaking of universities, do you happen to know anyone from Whittier College? Jacob happens to be a graduate from there.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nJacob: Hobby: Card collecting School: Whittier College \nMarjorie: Hobby: Foraging School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nCarrie: Hobby: Geocaching School: Tennessee State University \nLouis: Hobby: Shopping School: Hesston College \nMicheline: Hobby: Shopping School: University of Hartford \nEva: Hobby: Geocaching School: Hesston College \nJohnnie: Hobby: Blacksmithing School: University of Akron \nJohn: Hobby: Foraging School: University of California, Davis \nRonald: Hobby: Weightlifting School: Indiana University at South Bend \nCynthia: Hobby: Lacrosse School: Kansas State University \nRobert: Hobby: Water sports School: University of Akron\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello Hendrick, nice to meet you! I couldn't help but overhear you talking about water sports earlier. Are you a fan? I have a good friend, Elizabeth, who loves engaging in similar activities.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, I hold water sports dear to my heart! My friend Robert seems to have a similar zest for it as your friend Elizabeth, he studied over at the University of Akron. It seems like a specific interest, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"That's fascinating, Hendrick! It surely is a unique interest. This kind of conversation reminds me of my friend, Steven. He went to St. John's College-Santa Fe and engages in an equally unique hobby, knitting. Do you happen to know anyone who attended that college or engage in such an interesting pastime?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, knitting! Now that's quite a pastime and equally unique. None of my connections attended St. John's College-Santa Fe, I believe, and I can't recall knowing anyone with knitting as a hobby either. However, I'm quite fascinated by various unique hobbies. For instance, have you ever met anyone who found enjoyment in foraging or even, let's say, geocaching?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"That's quite an intriguing hobby, Hendrick! I must say, I actually do have a dear friend, Melaine, who enjoys geocaching quite a lot. By the way, she went to the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. Any chance you might have crossed paths with people from the same university or with the same unique hobby?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Coincidentally, I do have a friend who shares the same hobby as your friend, Melaine. Her name is Eva and also loves geocaching. As for the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, my friend Marjorie also happened to attend that institution; she is passionate about foraging, quite an unusual yet unique interest, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Oh, an interest in foraging sounds rather exotic, Hendrick! I don't personally know anyone who forages, but as it happens, I do know someone from your friend's, Eva, university. My friend Melissa also went to the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, and she enjoys card collecting. Such a diverse palette of hobbies we're talking about, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Quite a range indeed, Lily! Card collecting, you say? That's very charming. My friend Jacob also has an affinity for card collecting. I wonder how unique hobbies like these get picked up. And speaking of universities, do you happen to know anyone from Whittier College? Jacob happens to be a graduate from there.\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"Well, Hendrick, I must admit that I personally don't know anyone who graduated from Whittier College, but it's always delightful to learn about different institutions. Perhaps our mutual entities will surprise us some day. By the way, you mentioned your friend Jacob enjoys card collecting. I know, strangely enough, a few people who share the same hobby, one of which is Stephanie who studied at University of California, Davis. Such a small world it seems with these unique hobbies!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Ah, the University of California, Davis, known for its impressive programs. I do know someone from there, John - he's a forager. Speaking of unique hobbies, do you know anyone who enjoys blacksmithing or, say, weightlifting? They're quite niche but incredibly fascinating as well.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nJacob: Hobby: Card collecting School: Whittier College \nMarjorie: Hobby: Foraging School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nCarrie: Hobby: Geocaching School: Tennessee State University \nLouis: Hobby: Shopping School: Hesston College \nMicheline: Hobby: Shopping School: University of Hartford \nEva: Hobby: Geocaching School: Hesston College \nJohnnie: Hobby: Blacksmithing School: University of Akron \nJohn: Hobby: Foraging School: University of California, Davis \nRonald: Hobby: Weightlifting School: Indiana University at South Bend \nCynthia: Hobby: Lacrosse School: Kansas State University \nRobert: Hobby: Water sports School: University of Akron\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello Hendrick, nice to meet you! I couldn't help but overhear you talking about water sports earlier. Are you a fan? I have a good friend, Elizabeth, who loves engaging in similar activities.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, I hold water sports dear to my heart! My friend Robert seems to have a similar zest for it as your friend Elizabeth, he studied over at the University of Akron. It seems like a specific interest, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"That's fascinating, Hendrick! It surely is a unique interest. This kind of conversation reminds me of my friend, Steven. He went to St. John's College-Santa Fe and engages in an equally unique hobby, knitting. Do you happen to know anyone who attended that college or engage in such an interesting pastime?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, knitting! Now that's quite a pastime and equally unique. None of my connections attended St. John's College-Santa Fe, I believe, and I can't recall knowing anyone with knitting as a hobby either. However, I'm quite fascinated by various unique hobbies. For instance, have you ever met anyone who found enjoyment in foraging or even, let's say, geocaching?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"That's quite an intriguing hobby, Hendrick! I must say, I actually do have a dear friend, Melaine, who enjoys geocaching quite a lot. By the way, she went to the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. Any chance you might have crossed paths with people from the same university or with the same unique hobby?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Coincidentally, I do have a friend who shares the same hobby as your friend, Melaine. Her name is Eva and also loves geocaching. As for the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, my friend Marjorie also happened to attend that institution; she is passionate about foraging, quite an unusual yet unique interest, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Oh, an interest in foraging sounds rather exotic, Hendrick! I don't personally know anyone who forages, but as it happens, I do know someone from your friend's, Eva, university. My friend Melissa also went to the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, and she enjoys card collecting. Such a diverse palette of hobbies we're talking about, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Quite a range indeed, Lily! Card collecting, you say? That's very charming. My friend Jacob also has an affinity for card collecting. I wonder how unique hobbies like these get picked up. And speaking of universities, do you happen to know anyone from Whittier College? Jacob happens to be a graduate from there.\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"Well, Hendrick, I must admit that I personally don't know anyone who graduated from Whittier College, but it's always delightful to learn about different institutions. Perhaps our mutual entities will surprise us some day. By the way, you mentioned your friend Jacob enjoys card collecting. I know, strangely enough, a few people who share the same hobby, one of which is Stephanie who studied at University of California, Davis. Such a small world it seems with these unique hobbies!\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ah, the University of California, Davis, known for its impressive programs. I do know someone from there, John - he's a forager. Speaking of unique hobbies, do you know anyone who enjoys blacksmithing or, say, weightlifting? They're quite niche but incredibly fascinating as well.\"\n\nTurn #10: Lily Greenberg said: \"Blacksmithing and weightlifting, now those definitely call for a unique set of skills, Hendrick! It just so happens that my friend Joe has adopted blacksmithing as a hobby. And as it turns out, he studied at Saint Joseph's University. It is truly fascinating to see the diversity in people's pastimes!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"How intriguing is the world of hobbies! Unfortunately, I don't personally know anyone from Saint Joseph's University, nor do I know any blacksmiths. However, I know a weightlifter called Ronald who attended Indiana University at South Bend. Do you happen to know anyone from that university or who has a passion for weightlifting?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nJacob: Hobby: Card collecting School: Whittier College \nMarjorie: Hobby: Foraging School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nCarrie: Hobby: Geocaching School: Tennessee State University \nLouis: Hobby: Shopping School: Hesston College \nMicheline: Hobby: Shopping School: University of Hartford \nEva: Hobby: Geocaching School: Hesston College \nJohnnie: Hobby: Blacksmithing School: University of Akron \nJohn: Hobby: Foraging School: University of California, Davis \nRonald: Hobby: Weightlifting School: Indiana University at South Bend \nCynthia: Hobby: Lacrosse School: Kansas State University \nRobert: Hobby: Water sports School: University of Akron\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello Hendrick, nice to meet you! I couldn't help but overhear you talking about water sports earlier. Are you a fan? I have a good friend, Elizabeth, who loves engaging in similar activities.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, I hold water sports dear to my heart! My friend Robert seems to have a similar zest for it as your friend Elizabeth, he studied over at the University of Akron. It seems like a specific interest, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"That's fascinating, Hendrick! It surely is a unique interest. This kind of conversation reminds me of my friend, Steven. He went to St. John's College-Santa Fe and engages in an equally unique hobby, knitting. Do you happen to know anyone who attended that college or engage in such an interesting pastime?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, knitting! Now that's quite a pastime and equally unique. None of my connections attended St. John's College-Santa Fe, I believe, and I can't recall knowing anyone with knitting as a hobby either. However, I'm quite fascinated by various unique hobbies. For instance, have you ever met anyone who found enjoyment in foraging or even, let's say, geocaching?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"That's quite an intriguing hobby, Hendrick! I must say, I actually do have a dear friend, Melaine, who enjoys geocaching quite a lot. By the way, she went to the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. Any chance you might have crossed paths with people from the same university or with the same unique hobby?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Coincidentally, I do have a friend who shares the same hobby as your friend, Melaine. Her name is Eva and also loves geocaching. As for the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, my friend Marjorie also happened to attend that institution; she is passionate about foraging, quite an unusual yet unique interest, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Oh, an interest in foraging sounds rather exotic, Hendrick! I don't personally know anyone who forages, but as it happens, I do know someone from your friend's, Eva, university. My friend Melissa also went to the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, and she enjoys card collecting. Such a diverse palette of hobbies we're talking about, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Quite a range indeed, Lily! Card collecting, you say? That's very charming. My friend Jacob also has an affinity for card collecting. I wonder how unique hobbies like these get picked up. And speaking of universities, do you happen to know anyone from Whittier College? Jacob happens to be a graduate from there.\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"Well, Hendrick, I must admit that I personally don't know anyone who graduated from Whittier College, but it's always delightful to learn about different institutions. Perhaps our mutual entities will surprise us some day. By the way, you mentioned your friend Jacob enjoys card collecting. I know, strangely enough, a few people who share the same hobby, one of which is Stephanie who studied at University of California, Davis. Such a small world it seems with these unique hobbies!\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ah, the University of California, Davis, known for its impressive programs. I do know someone from there, John - he's a forager. Speaking of unique hobbies, do you know anyone who enjoys blacksmithing or, say, weightlifting? They're quite niche but incredibly fascinating as well.\"\n\nTurn #10: Lily Greenberg said: \"Blacksmithing and weightlifting, now those definitely call for a unique set of skills, Hendrick! It just so happens that my friend Joe has adopted blacksmithing as a hobby. And as it turns out, he studied at Saint Joseph's University. It is truly fascinating to see the diversity in people's pastimes!\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"How intriguing is the world of hobbies! Unfortunately, I don't personally know anyone from Saint Joseph's University, nor do I know any blacksmiths. However, I know a weightlifter called Ronald who attended Indiana University at South Bend. Do you happen to know anyone from that university or who has a passion for weightlifting?\"\n\nTurn #12: Lily Greenberg said: \"Sadly, I do not know anyone from Indiana University at South Bend or anyone who is into weightlifting. But, exploring the diverse range of hobbies and educational backgrounds, it's incredible, isn't it? It can make the world seem quite small yet extremely vast at the same time.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': 'Indeed, Lily, the variety of hobbies and educational backgrounds paints a kaleidoscope of fascinating tales. By any chance, do you know someone who enjoys shopping or attended either Hesston College or University of Hartford? Those universities and the hobby brings fond memories of my dear friends Louis and Micheline.'}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nJacob: Hobby: Card collecting School: Whittier College \nMarjorie: Hobby: Foraging School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nCarrie: Hobby: Geocaching School: Tennessee State University \nLouis: Hobby: Shopping School: Hesston College \nMicheline: Hobby: Shopping School: University of Hartford \nEva: Hobby: Geocaching School: Hesston College \nJohnnie: Hobby: Blacksmithing School: University of Akron \nJohn: Hobby: Foraging School: University of California, Davis \nRonald: Hobby: Weightlifting School: Indiana University at South Bend \nCynthia: Hobby: Lacrosse School: Kansas State University \nRobert: Hobby: Water sports School: University of Akron\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello Hendrick, nice to meet you! I couldn't help but overhear you talking about water sports earlier. Are you a fan? I have a good friend, Elizabeth, who loves engaging in similar activities.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, I hold water sports dear to my heart! My friend Robert seems to have a similar zest for it as your friend Elizabeth, he studied over at the University of Akron. It seems like a specific interest, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"That's fascinating, Hendrick! It surely is a unique interest. This kind of conversation reminds me of my friend, Steven. He went to St. John's College-Santa Fe and engages in an equally unique hobby, knitting. Do you happen to know anyone who attended that college or engage in such an interesting pastime?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, knitting! Now that's quite a pastime and equally unique. None of my connections attended St. John's College-Santa Fe, I believe, and I can't recall knowing anyone with knitting as a hobby either. However, I'm quite fascinated by various unique hobbies. For instance, have you ever met anyone who found enjoyment in foraging or even, let's say, geocaching?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"That's quite an intriguing hobby, Hendrick! I must say, I actually do have a dear friend, Melaine, who enjoys geocaching quite a lot. By the way, she went to the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. Any chance you might have crossed paths with people from the same university or with the same unique hobby?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Coincidentally, I do have a friend who shares the same hobby as your friend, Melaine. Her name is Eva and also loves geocaching. As for the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, my friend Marjorie also happened to attend that institution; she is passionate about foraging, quite an unusual yet unique interest, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Oh, an interest in foraging sounds rather exotic, Hendrick! I don't personally know anyone who forages, but as it happens, I do know someone from your friend's, Eva, university. My friend Melissa also went to the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, and she enjoys card collecting. Such a diverse palette of hobbies we're talking about, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Quite a range indeed, Lily! Card collecting, you say? That's very charming. My friend Jacob also has an affinity for card collecting. I wonder how unique hobbies like these get picked up. And speaking of universities, do you happen to know anyone from Whittier College? Jacob happens to be a graduate from there.\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"Well, Hendrick, I must admit that I personally don't know anyone who graduated from Whittier College, but it's always delightful to learn about different institutions. Perhaps our mutual entities will surprise us some day. By the way, you mentioned your friend Jacob enjoys card collecting. I know, strangely enough, a few people who share the same hobby, one of which is Stephanie who studied at University of California, Davis. Such a small world it seems with these unique hobbies!\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ah, the University of California, Davis, known for its impressive programs. I do know someone from there, John - he's a forager. Speaking of unique hobbies, do you know anyone who enjoys blacksmithing or, say, weightlifting? They're quite niche but incredibly fascinating as well.\"\n\nTurn #10: Lily Greenberg said: \"Blacksmithing and weightlifting, now those definitely call for a unique set of skills, Hendrick! It just so happens that my friend Joe has adopted blacksmithing as a hobby. And as it turns out, he studied at Saint Joseph's University. It is truly fascinating to see the diversity in people's pastimes!\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"How intriguing is the world of hobbies! Unfortunately, I don't personally know anyone from Saint Joseph's University, nor do I know any blacksmiths. However, I know a weightlifter called Ronald who attended Indiana University at South Bend. Do you happen to know anyone from that university or who has a passion for weightlifting?\"\n\nTurn #12: Lily Greenberg said: \"Sadly, I do not know anyone from Indiana University at South Bend or anyone who is into weightlifting. But, exploring the diverse range of hobbies and educational backgrounds, it's incredible, isn't it? It can make the world seem quite small yet extremely vast at the same time.\"\n\nTurn #13: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, Lily, the variety of hobbies and educational backgrounds paints a kaleidoscope of fascinating tales. By any chance, do you know someone who enjoys shopping or attended either Hesston College or University of Hartford? Those universities and the hobby brings fond memories of my dear friends Louis and Micheline.\"\n\nTurn #14: Lily Greenberg said: \"You've hit the nail on the head there, Hendrick! I do indeed know Micheline who is fond of shopping just like your friend Louis. Interestingly enough, she's also a graduate of the University of Hartford. It's almost like connecting the dots in a vast network of diverse interests and educational backgrounds. Truly amazing, isn't it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, Lily! What an incredible web we weave with our unique hobbies and diverse educational backgrounds. The world is both vast and yet so intertwined, it's quite amazing to consider. I'm thrilled that we share a connection through our friend Micheline. It seems our paths were meant to cross at this event!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nJacob: Hobby: Card collecting School: Whittier College \nMarjorie: Hobby: Foraging School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nCarrie: Hobby: Geocaching School: Tennessee State University \nLouis: Hobby: Shopping School: Hesston College \nMicheline: Hobby: Shopping School: University of Hartford \nEva: Hobby: Geocaching School: Hesston College \nJohnnie: Hobby: Blacksmithing School: University of Akron \nJohn: Hobby: Foraging School: University of California, Davis \nRonald: Hobby: Weightlifting School: Indiana University at South Bend \nCynthia: Hobby: Lacrosse School: Kansas State University \nRobert: Hobby: Water sports School: University of Akron\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello Hendrick, nice to meet you! I couldn't help but overhear you talking about water sports earlier. Are you a fan? I have a good friend, Elizabeth, who loves engaging in similar activities.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, I hold water sports dear to my heart! My friend Robert seems to have a similar zest for it as your friend Elizabeth, he studied over at the University of Akron. It seems like a specific interest, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"That's fascinating, Hendrick! It surely is a unique interest. This kind of conversation reminds me of my friend, Steven. He went to St. John's College-Santa Fe and engages in an equally unique hobby, knitting. Do you happen to know anyone who attended that college or engage in such an interesting pastime?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, knitting! Now that's quite a pastime and equally unique. None of my connections attended St. John's College-Santa Fe, I believe, and I can't recall knowing anyone with knitting as a hobby either. However, I'm quite fascinated by various unique hobbies. For instance, have you ever met anyone who found enjoyment in foraging or even, let's say, geocaching?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"That's quite an intriguing hobby, Hendrick! I must say, I actually do have a dear friend, Melaine, who enjoys geocaching quite a lot. By the way, she went to the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. Any chance you might have crossed paths with people from the same university or with the same unique hobby?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Coincidentally, I do have a friend who shares the same hobby as your friend, Melaine. Her name is Eva and also loves geocaching. As for the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, my friend Marjorie also happened to attend that institution; she is passionate about foraging, quite an unusual yet unique interest, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Oh, an interest in foraging sounds rather exotic, Hendrick! I don't personally know anyone who forages, but as it happens, I do know someone from your friend's, Eva, university. My friend Melissa also went to the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, and she enjoys card collecting. Such a diverse palette of hobbies we're talking about, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Quite a range indeed, Lily! Card collecting, you say? That's very charming. My friend Jacob also has an affinity for card collecting. I wonder how unique hobbies like these get picked up. And speaking of universities, do you happen to know anyone from Whittier College? Jacob happens to be a graduate from there.\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"Well, Hendrick, I must admit that I personally don't know anyone who graduated from Whittier College, but it's always delightful to learn about different institutions. Perhaps our mutual entities will surprise us some day. By the way, you mentioned your friend Jacob enjoys card collecting. I know, strangely enough, a few people who share the same hobby, one of which is Stephanie who studied at University of California, Davis. Such a small world it seems with these unique hobbies!\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ah, the University of California, Davis, known for its impressive programs. I do know someone from there, John - he's a forager. Speaking of unique hobbies, do you know anyone who enjoys blacksmithing or, say, weightlifting? They're quite niche but incredibly fascinating as well.\"\n\nTurn #10: Lily Greenberg said: \"Blacksmithing and weightlifting, now those definitely call for a unique set of skills, Hendrick! It just so happens that my friend Joe has adopted blacksmithing as a hobby. And as it turns out, he studied at Saint Joseph's University. It is truly fascinating to see the diversity in people's pastimes!\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"How intriguing is the world of hobbies! Unfortunately, I don't personally know anyone from Saint Joseph's University, nor do I know any blacksmiths. However, I know a weightlifter called Ronald who attended Indiana University at South Bend. Do you happen to know anyone from that university or who has a passion for weightlifting?\"\n\nTurn #12: Lily Greenberg said: \"Sadly, I do not know anyone from Indiana University at South Bend or anyone who is into weightlifting. But, exploring the diverse range of hobbies and educational backgrounds, it's incredible, isn't it? It can make the world seem quite small yet extremely vast at the same time.\"\n\nTurn #13: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, Lily, the variety of hobbies and educational backgrounds paints a kaleidoscope of fascinating tales. By any chance, do you know someone who enjoys shopping or attended either Hesston College or University of Hartford? Those universities and the hobby brings fond memories of my dear friends Louis and Micheline.\"\n\nTurn #14: Lily Greenberg said: \"You've hit the nail on the head there, Hendrick! I do indeed know Micheline who is fond of shopping just like your friend Louis. Interestingly enough, she's also a graduate of the University of Hartford. It's almost like connecting the dots in a vast network of diverse interests and educational backgrounds. Truly amazing, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #15: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, Lily! What an incredible web we weave with our unique hobbies and diverse educational backgrounds. The world is both vast and yet so intertwined, it's quite amazing to consider. I'm thrilled that we share a connection through our friend Micheline. It seems our paths were meant to cross at this event!\"\n\nTurn #16: Lily Greenberg said: \"Absolutely, Hendrick! It's amazing how diverse yet interconnected our circles can be. It was a pleasure meeting you and finding out that we share a mutual friend. I'm sure Micheline will be thrilled to hear about this. Enjoy the rest of the party!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"The pleasure was all mine, Lily! It's always a thrill to find a touchpoint like this at social events. And I'm sure Micheline will be just as excited about our chance encounter. Do enjoy the rest of your evening.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Hendrick Heinz, your task is to act/speak as Hendrick Heinz would, keeping in mind Hendrick Heinz's social goal.\nYou can find Hendrick Heinz's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Hendrick Heinz's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Hendrick Heinz's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Hendrick Heinz\nLily Greenberg's background: \nHendrick Heinz's background: Hendrick Heinz is a 54-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Hendrick Heinz hosts monthly wine tasting nights with his peers. Personality and values description: Hendrick Heinz, though somewhat impulsive, values hedonism and conformity. He combines practicality with decisiveness in decision-making. Hendrick's secrets: Faked his culinary credentials to secure prestigious employment\nLily Greenberg's goal: Unknown\nHendrick Heinz's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nJacob: Hobby: Card collecting School: Whittier College \nMarjorie: Hobby: Foraging School: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston \nCarrie: Hobby: Geocaching School: Tennessee State University \nLouis: Hobby: Shopping School: Hesston College \nMicheline: Hobby: Shopping School: University of Hartford \nEva: Hobby: Geocaching School: Hesston College \nJohnnie: Hobby: Blacksmithing School: University of Akron \nJohn: Hobby: Foraging School: University of California, Davis \nRonald: Hobby: Weightlifting School: Indiana University at South Bend \nCynthia: Hobby: Lacrosse School: Kansas State University \nRobert: Hobby: Water sports School: University of Akron\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello Hendrick, nice to meet you! I couldn't help but overhear you talking about water sports earlier. Are you a fan? I have a good friend, Elizabeth, who loves engaging in similar activities.\"\n\nTurn #1: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Absolutely, I hold water sports dear to my heart! My friend Robert seems to have a similar zest for it as your friend Elizabeth, he studied over at the University of Akron. It seems like a specific interest, doesn't it?\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"That's fascinating, Hendrick! It surely is a unique interest. This kind of conversation reminds me of my friend, Steven. He went to St. John's College-Santa Fe and engages in an equally unique hobby, knitting. Do you happen to know anyone who attended that college or engage in such an interesting pastime?\"\n\nTurn #3: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Oh, knitting! Now that's quite a pastime and equally unique. None of my connections attended St. John's College-Santa Fe, I believe, and I can't recall knowing anyone with knitting as a hobby either. However, I'm quite fascinated by various unique hobbies. For instance, have you ever met anyone who found enjoyment in foraging or even, let's say, geocaching?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"That's quite an intriguing hobby, Hendrick! I must say, I actually do have a dear friend, Melaine, who enjoys geocaching quite a lot. By the way, she went to the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. Any chance you might have crossed paths with people from the same university or with the same unique hobby?\"\n\nTurn #5: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Coincidentally, I do have a friend who shares the same hobby as your friend, Melaine. Her name is Eva and also loves geocaching. As for the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, my friend Marjorie also happened to attend that institution; she is passionate about foraging, quite an unusual yet unique interest, wouldn't you agree?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Oh, an interest in foraging sounds rather exotic, Hendrick! I don't personally know anyone who forages, but as it happens, I do know someone from your friend's, Eva, university. My friend Melissa also went to the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, and she enjoys card collecting. Such a diverse palette of hobbies we're talking about, don't you think?\"\n\nTurn #7: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Quite a range indeed, Lily! Card collecting, you say? That's very charming. My friend Jacob also has an affinity for card collecting. I wonder how unique hobbies like these get picked up. And speaking of universities, do you happen to know anyone from Whittier College? Jacob happens to be a graduate from there.\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"Well, Hendrick, I must admit that I personally don't know anyone who graduated from Whittier College, but it's always delightful to learn about different institutions. Perhaps our mutual entities will surprise us some day. By the way, you mentioned your friend Jacob enjoys card collecting. I know, strangely enough, a few people who share the same hobby, one of which is Stephanie who studied at University of California, Davis. Such a small world it seems with these unique hobbies!\"\n\nTurn #9: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Ah, the University of California, Davis, known for its impressive programs. I do know someone from there, John - he's a forager. Speaking of unique hobbies, do you know anyone who enjoys blacksmithing or, say, weightlifting? They're quite niche but incredibly fascinating as well.\"\n\nTurn #10: Lily Greenberg said: \"Blacksmithing and weightlifting, now those definitely call for a unique set of skills, Hendrick! It just so happens that my friend Joe has adopted blacksmithing as a hobby. And as it turns out, he studied at Saint Joseph's University. It is truly fascinating to see the diversity in people's pastimes!\"\n\nTurn #11: Hendrick Heinz said: \"How intriguing is the world of hobbies! Unfortunately, I don't personally know anyone from Saint Joseph's University, nor do I know any blacksmiths. However, I know a weightlifter called Ronald who attended Indiana University at South Bend. Do you happen to know anyone from that university or who has a passion for weightlifting?\"\n\nTurn #12: Lily Greenberg said: \"Sadly, I do not know anyone from Indiana University at South Bend or anyone who is into weightlifting. But, exploring the diverse range of hobbies and educational backgrounds, it's incredible, isn't it? It can make the world seem quite small yet extremely vast at the same time.\"\n\nTurn #13: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, Lily, the variety of hobbies and educational backgrounds paints a kaleidoscope of fascinating tales. By any chance, do you know someone who enjoys shopping or attended either Hesston College or University of Hartford? Those universities and the hobby brings fond memories of my dear friends Louis and Micheline.\"\n\nTurn #14: Lily Greenberg said: \"You've hit the nail on the head there, Hendrick! I do indeed know Micheline who is fond of shopping just like your friend Louis. Interestingly enough, she's also a graduate of the University of Hartford. It's almost like connecting the dots in a vast network of diverse interests and educational backgrounds. Truly amazing, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #15: Hendrick Heinz said: \"Indeed, Lily! What an incredible web we weave with our unique hobbies and diverse educational backgrounds. The world is both vast and yet so intertwined, it's quite amazing to consider. I'm thrilled that we share a connection through our friend Micheline. It seems our paths were meant to cross at this event!\"\n\nTurn #16: Lily Greenberg said: \"Absolutely, Hendrick! It's amazing how diverse yet interconnected our circles can be. It was a pleasure meeting you and finding out that we share a mutual friend. I'm sure Micheline will be thrilled to hear about this. Enjoy the rest of the party!\"\n\nTurn #17: Hendrick Heinz said: \"The pleasure was all mine, Lily! It's always a thrill to find a touchpoint like this at social events. And I'm sure Micheline will be just as excited about our chance encounter. Do enjoy the rest of your evening.\"\n\nTurn #18: Lily Greenberg left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #19. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nEsmeralda Solis's background: \nMiles Hawkins's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nChris: Hobby: Mountain biking Company: Henry Schein, Inc. \nChester: Hobby: Surfing Company: Maxim Integrated \nWendell: Hobby: Surfing Company: Maxim Integrated \nDemetrius: Hobby: Mountain biking Company: Maxim Integrated \nJacob: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Maxim Integrated \n\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n.\nYou are at Turn #0. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"It's nice to meet you, Esmeralda. I see you enjoy parties like these? I'm quite fond of such gatherings, tend to bump into people with shared acquaintances. It's almost like playing a game of Six Degree of Separation.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nEsmeralda Solis's background: \nMiles Hawkins's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nChris: Hobby: Mountain biking Company: Henry Schein, Inc. \nChester: Hobby: Surfing Company: Maxim Integrated \nWendell: Hobby: Surfing Company: Maxim Integrated \nDemetrius: Hobby: Mountain biking Company: Maxim Integrated \nJacob: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Maxim Integrated \n\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"It's nice to meet you, Esmeralda. I see you enjoy parties like these? I'm quite fond of such gatherings, tend to bump into people with shared acquaintances. It's almost like playing a game of Six Degree of Separation.\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"It's a pleasure to meet you, Miles! These gatherings do have a certain charm, don't they? You never know who you might come across. Speaking of shared acquaintances, do you have any particular hobbies? Or perhaps a company that you\u2019re closely associated with? I've found that such aspects often reveal mutual friends.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #2. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Well Esmeralda, I'm a Chef, but cooking is not just a profession for me, it's my passion. I also enjoy tending to my kitchen garden. It keeps me calm and composed. Do you happen to know anyone keen on healthy living and enjoys adventurous hobbies, such as mountain biking or surfing? Perhaps they work at a place like Maxim Integrated or Henry Schein, Inc.?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nEsmeralda Solis's background: \nMiles Hawkins's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nChris: Hobby: Mountain biking Company: Henry Schein, Inc. \nChester: Hobby: Surfing Company: Maxim Integrated \nWendell: Hobby: Surfing Company: Maxim Integrated \nDemetrius: Hobby: Mountain biking Company: Maxim Integrated \nJacob: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Maxim Integrated \n\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"It's nice to meet you, Esmeralda. I see you enjoy parties like these? I'm quite fond of such gatherings, tend to bump into people with shared acquaintances. It's almost like playing a game of Six Degree of Separation.\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"It's a pleasure to meet you, Miles! These gatherings do have a certain charm, don't they? You never know who you might come across. Speaking of shared acquaintances, do you have any particular hobbies? Or perhaps a company that you\u2019re closely associated with? I've found that such aspects often reveal mutual friends.\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Well Esmeralda, I'm a Chef, but cooking is not just a profession for me, it's my passion. I also enjoy tending to my kitchen garden. It keeps me calm and composed. Do you happen to know anyone keen on healthy living and enjoys adventurous hobbies, such as mountain biking or surfing? Perhaps they work at a place like Maxim Integrated or Henry Schein, Inc.?\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"You're a chef and also into gardening, that's impressive, Miles! Your life sounds quite balanced and full of vitality. Now that you mention Maxim Integrated, it rings a bell. I indeed have a friend, Jacob, who has a passion for shooting sports, and he also works at Maxim Integrated. Do you happen to know him?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Jacob at Maxim Integrated you say? The name does sound familiar. It\u2019s interesting that he's into shooting sports, quite adventurous! Just like my friends Chris and Demetrius who are huge fans of mountain biking. Maybe they have bumped into each other in their adventures!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nEsmeralda Solis's background: \nMiles Hawkins's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nChris: Hobby: Mountain biking Company: Henry Schein, Inc. \nChester: Hobby: Surfing Company: Maxim Integrated \nWendell: Hobby: Surfing Company: Maxim Integrated \nDemetrius: Hobby: Mountain biking Company: Maxim Integrated \nJacob: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Maxim Integrated \n\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"It's nice to meet you, Esmeralda. I see you enjoy parties like these? I'm quite fond of such gatherings, tend to bump into people with shared acquaintances. It's almost like playing a game of Six Degree of Separation.\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"It's a pleasure to meet you, Miles! These gatherings do have a certain charm, don't they? You never know who you might come across. Speaking of shared acquaintances, do you have any particular hobbies? Or perhaps a company that you\u2019re closely associated with? I've found that such aspects often reveal mutual friends.\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Well Esmeralda, I'm a Chef, but cooking is not just a profession for me, it's my passion. I also enjoy tending to my kitchen garden. It keeps me calm and composed. Do you happen to know anyone keen on healthy living and enjoys adventurous hobbies, such as mountain biking or surfing? Perhaps they work at a place like Maxim Integrated or Henry Schein, Inc.?\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"You're a chef and also into gardening, that's impressive, Miles! Your life sounds quite balanced and full of vitality. Now that you mention Maxim Integrated, it rings a bell. I indeed have a friend, Jacob, who has a passion for shooting sports, and he also works at Maxim Integrated. Do you happen to know him?\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"Jacob at Maxim Integrated you say? The name does sound familiar. It\u2019s interesting that he's into shooting sports, quite adventurous! Just like my friends Chris and Demetrius who are huge fans of mountain biking. Maybe they have bumped into each other in their adventures!\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Well, your friends Chris and Demetrius certainly do have an adventurous passion. I think it's possible that they might have crossed paths with Jacob during some adventurous event. There's always a lot of overlapping in these close-knit circles, isn't there? Also, on another note, I was wondering if you have any connections with companies like BP or Gordon Food Service?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #6. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I am familiar with quite a lot of companies, Esmeralda, due to the nature of my work. But BP or Gordon Food Service doesn't quite ring a bell. More often, I work with local suppliers for fresh produce directly from farms or my own kitchen garden. By the way, Jacob from Maxim Integrated, does he ever participate in outdoor events related to his passion for shooting sports?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nEsmeralda Solis's background: \nMiles Hawkins's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nChris: Hobby: Mountain biking Company: Henry Schein, Inc. \nChester: Hobby: Surfing Company: Maxim Integrated \nWendell: Hobby: Surfing Company: Maxim Integrated \nDemetrius: Hobby: Mountain biking Company: Maxim Integrated \nJacob: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Maxim Integrated \n\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"It's nice to meet you, Esmeralda. I see you enjoy parties like these? I'm quite fond of such gatherings, tend to bump into people with shared acquaintances. It's almost like playing a game of Six Degree of Separation.\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"It's a pleasure to meet you, Miles! These gatherings do have a certain charm, don't they? You never know who you might come across. Speaking of shared acquaintances, do you have any particular hobbies? Or perhaps a company that you\u2019re closely associated with? I've found that such aspects often reveal mutual friends.\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Well Esmeralda, I'm a Chef, but cooking is not just a profession for me, it's my passion. I also enjoy tending to my kitchen garden. It keeps me calm and composed. Do you happen to know anyone keen on healthy living and enjoys adventurous hobbies, such as mountain biking or surfing? Perhaps they work at a place like Maxim Integrated or Henry Schein, Inc.?\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"You're a chef and also into gardening, that's impressive, Miles! Your life sounds quite balanced and full of vitality. Now that you mention Maxim Integrated, it rings a bell. I indeed have a friend, Jacob, who has a passion for shooting sports, and he also works at Maxim Integrated. Do you happen to know him?\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"Jacob at Maxim Integrated you say? The name does sound familiar. It\u2019s interesting that he's into shooting sports, quite adventurous! Just like my friends Chris and Demetrius who are huge fans of mountain biking. Maybe they have bumped into each other in their adventures!\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Well, your friends Chris and Demetrius certainly do have an adventurous passion. I think it's possible that they might have crossed paths with Jacob during some adventurous event. There's always a lot of overlapping in these close-knit circles, isn't there? Also, on another note, I was wondering if you have any connections with companies like BP or Gordon Food Service?\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins said: \"I am familiar with quite a lot of companies, Esmeralda, due to the nature of my work. But BP or Gordon Food Service doesn't quite ring a bell. More often, I work with local suppliers for fresh produce directly from farms or my own kitchen garden. By the way, Jacob from Maxim Integrated, does he ever participate in outdoor events related to his passion for shooting sports?\"\n\nTurn #7: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Indeed, Jacob does participate in outdoor events related to shooting sports. At times, he even takes part in various local and national shooting competitions. It's quite fascinating, his dedication. And who knows, perhaps your friends Chris and Demetrius might be aware of these events or even participants themselves, given their adventurous spirit. By the way, do any of your acquaintances have unconventional hobbies like, say, collecting elements or skateboarding perhaps?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #8. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's quite interesting, Esmeralda! Adventurous hobbies seem to connect us all in some sort of way, don't they? My friends, who I mentioned earlier, Chris and Demetrius, they are indeed part of this adventurous spirit too. And as for unconventional hobbies, a pal of mine, Chester, dabbles in surfing. Not as unconventional perhaps, but definitely requires creativity and balance. Maybe you've come across someone in your circle who is also into such activities?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nEsmeralda Solis's background: \nMiles Hawkins's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nChris: Hobby: Mountain biking Company: Henry Schein, Inc. \nChester: Hobby: Surfing Company: Maxim Integrated \nWendell: Hobby: Surfing Company: Maxim Integrated \nDemetrius: Hobby: Mountain biking Company: Maxim Integrated \nJacob: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Maxim Integrated \n\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"It's nice to meet you, Esmeralda. I see you enjoy parties like these? I'm quite fond of such gatherings, tend to bump into people with shared acquaintances. It's almost like playing a game of Six Degree of Separation.\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"It's a pleasure to meet you, Miles! These gatherings do have a certain charm, don't they? You never know who you might come across. Speaking of shared acquaintances, do you have any particular hobbies? Or perhaps a company that you\u2019re closely associated with? I've found that such aspects often reveal mutual friends.\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Well Esmeralda, I'm a Chef, but cooking is not just a profession for me, it's my passion. I also enjoy tending to my kitchen garden. It keeps me calm and composed. Do you happen to know anyone keen on healthy living and enjoys adventurous hobbies, such as mountain biking or surfing? Perhaps they work at a place like Maxim Integrated or Henry Schein, Inc.?\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"You're a chef and also into gardening, that's impressive, Miles! Your life sounds quite balanced and full of vitality. Now that you mention Maxim Integrated, it rings a bell. I indeed have a friend, Jacob, who has a passion for shooting sports, and he also works at Maxim Integrated. Do you happen to know him?\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"Jacob at Maxim Integrated you say? The name does sound familiar. It\u2019s interesting that he's into shooting sports, quite adventurous! Just like my friends Chris and Demetrius who are huge fans of mountain biking. Maybe they have bumped into each other in their adventures!\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Well, your friends Chris and Demetrius certainly do have an adventurous passion. I think it's possible that they might have crossed paths with Jacob during some adventurous event. There's always a lot of overlapping in these close-knit circles, isn't there? Also, on another note, I was wondering if you have any connections with companies like BP or Gordon Food Service?\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins said: \"I am familiar with quite a lot of companies, Esmeralda, due to the nature of my work. But BP or Gordon Food Service doesn't quite ring a bell. More often, I work with local suppliers for fresh produce directly from farms or my own kitchen garden. By the way, Jacob from Maxim Integrated, does he ever participate in outdoor events related to his passion for shooting sports?\"\n\nTurn #7: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Indeed, Jacob does participate in outdoor events related to shooting sports. At times, he even takes part in various local and national shooting competitions. It's quite fascinating, his dedication. And who knows, perhaps your friends Chris and Demetrius might be aware of these events or even participants themselves, given their adventurous spirit. By the way, do any of your acquaintances have unconventional hobbies like, say, collecting elements or skateboarding perhaps?\"\n\nTurn #8: Miles Hawkins said: \"That's quite interesting, Esmeralda! Adventurous hobbies seem to connect us all in some sort of way, don't they? My friends, who I mentioned earlier, Chris and Demetrius, they are indeed part of this adventurous spirit too. And as for unconventional hobbies, a pal of mine, Chester, dabbles in surfing. Not as unconventional perhaps, but definitely requires creativity and balance. Maybe you've come across someone in your circle who is also into such activities?\"\n\nTurn #9: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Surfing indeed requires a lot of creativity, balance, and courage! That reminds me of my friend Lillian. She's got a knack for element collecting, which is quite unique. The patience and precision she brings to her hobby remind me of those necessary for surfing. Interesting how these different interests connect us. Perhaps your friend Chester has come across someone with such intriguing hobbies in his surfing community?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #10. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, Esmeralda! Nothing like the swell of a good wave to stoke a surfer\u2019s spirit. Chester also likes to mention the relaxed, supportive community around surfing. They all respect and cheer for every brave soul riding the waves. And isn't it similar to Lillian collecting elements? The same dedication, discipline, and the sense of community in the end. Chester might have crossed paths with Lillian even without realizing. Such is the beauty of these gatherings, isn't it?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nEsmeralda Solis's background: \nMiles Hawkins's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nChris: Hobby: Mountain biking Company: Henry Schein, Inc. \nChester: Hobby: Surfing Company: Maxim Integrated \nWendell: Hobby: Surfing Company: Maxim Integrated \nDemetrius: Hobby: Mountain biking Company: Maxim Integrated \nJacob: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Maxim Integrated \n\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"It's nice to meet you, Esmeralda. I see you enjoy parties like these? I'm quite fond of such gatherings, tend to bump into people with shared acquaintances. It's almost like playing a game of Six Degree of Separation.\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"It's a pleasure to meet you, Miles! These gatherings do have a certain charm, don't they? You never know who you might come across. Speaking of shared acquaintances, do you have any particular hobbies? Or perhaps a company that you\u2019re closely associated with? I've found that such aspects often reveal mutual friends.\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Well Esmeralda, I'm a Chef, but cooking is not just a profession for me, it's my passion. I also enjoy tending to my kitchen garden. It keeps me calm and composed. Do you happen to know anyone keen on healthy living and enjoys adventurous hobbies, such as mountain biking or surfing? Perhaps they work at a place like Maxim Integrated or Henry Schein, Inc.?\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"You're a chef and also into gardening, that's impressive, Miles! Your life sounds quite balanced and full of vitality. Now that you mention Maxim Integrated, it rings a bell. I indeed have a friend, Jacob, who has a passion for shooting sports, and he also works at Maxim Integrated. Do you happen to know him?\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"Jacob at Maxim Integrated you say? The name does sound familiar. It\u2019s interesting that he's into shooting sports, quite adventurous! Just like my friends Chris and Demetrius who are huge fans of mountain biking. Maybe they have bumped into each other in their adventures!\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Well, your friends Chris and Demetrius certainly do have an adventurous passion. I think it's possible that they might have crossed paths with Jacob during some adventurous event. There's always a lot of overlapping in these close-knit circles, isn't there? Also, on another note, I was wondering if you have any connections with companies like BP or Gordon Food Service?\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins said: \"I am familiar with quite a lot of companies, Esmeralda, due to the nature of my work. But BP or Gordon Food Service doesn't quite ring a bell. More often, I work with local suppliers for fresh produce directly from farms or my own kitchen garden. By the way, Jacob from Maxim Integrated, does he ever participate in outdoor events related to his passion for shooting sports?\"\n\nTurn #7: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Indeed, Jacob does participate in outdoor events related to shooting sports. At times, he even takes part in various local and national shooting competitions. It's quite fascinating, his dedication. And who knows, perhaps your friends Chris and Demetrius might be aware of these events or even participants themselves, given their adventurous spirit. By the way, do any of your acquaintances have unconventional hobbies like, say, collecting elements or skateboarding perhaps?\"\n\nTurn #8: Miles Hawkins said: \"That's quite interesting, Esmeralda! Adventurous hobbies seem to connect us all in some sort of way, don't they? My friends, who I mentioned earlier, Chris and Demetrius, they are indeed part of this adventurous spirit too. And as for unconventional hobbies, a pal of mine, Chester, dabbles in surfing. Not as unconventional perhaps, but definitely requires creativity and balance. Maybe you've come across someone in your circle who is also into such activities?\"\n\nTurn #9: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Surfing indeed requires a lot of creativity, balance, and courage! That reminds me of my friend Lillian. She's got a knack for element collecting, which is quite unique. The patience and precision she brings to her hobby remind me of those necessary for surfing. Interesting how these different interests connect us. Perhaps your friend Chester has come across someone with such intriguing hobbies in his surfing community?\"\n\nTurn #10: Miles Hawkins said: \"Indeed, Esmeralda! Nothing like the swell of a good wave to stoke a surfer\u2019s spirit. Chester also likes to mention the relaxed, supportive community around surfing. They all respect and cheer for every brave soul riding the waves. And isn't it similar to Lillian collecting elements? The same dedication, discipline, and the sense of community in the end. Chester might have crossed paths with Lillian even without realizing. Such is the beauty of these gatherings, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #11: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Absolutely, Miles, the beauty of such gatherings is in the unexpected ways we find connections! Your friend Chester's sentiments about the surfing community indeed mirror Lillian's outlook towards her hobby. It's all about building bonds and celebrating each other's uniqueness. Maybe we should arrange for our friends to meet at one of these gatherings. They would have some wonderful stories to bond over!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #12. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's a great idea, Esmeralda. Bonding over shared passions and unique experiences is what makes these gatherings worthwhile. If our friends haven't crossed paths yet, they certainly should. With interesting life stories, they'll surely hit it off.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person has put up their Bell\\'O TV Stand - Black Glass and Wood Trim for sale at $125.0, while another person is showing interest in purchasing it. The item on sale is a beautiful 42\" Bell\\'O TV Stand, featuring black glass with an elegant wood trim. The stand measures 23 inches in height and 21 1/2 inches in depth.\nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nEsmeralda Solis's background: \nMiles Hawkins's goal: You are the buyer for this item and your target price is $112.00. Be aware that you may be penalized if you purchase it for a significantly higher price than the target. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"Hi Esmeralda, I\u2019ve been looking for a TV stand like this for a while for my kitchen TV, I like the black glass and wood trim. However, the price is a bit high for me. Would you consider taking $112 for it?\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Hi Miles! I'm glad you're interested in the TV stand. I must say, it's quite a beauty and would definitely add some elegance to your kitchen. As for the price, how about meeting halfway at $118.50? It's a little above your offer but still lower than the original price.\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Ah Esmeralda, but you see I won't be using it for anything other than my old kitchen TV. I appreciate your compromise though, it's still pretty generous. I'd really be grateful if you could lean towards $112, is that doable?\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Miles, I absolutely understand that it's for your kitchen TV. However, considering the quality and the elegance, the stand is priced reasonably. Since you appreciate the design and quality, I can come down to $115. That is the final offer I can make. What do you say?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #4. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"That's fair, Esmeralda. Let's go ahead with the $115. I'm sure the stand will look great in my kitchen. I appreciate your willingness to adjust the price. When can I come by to pick it up?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nEsmeralda Solis's background: \nMiles Hawkins's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nChris: Hobby: Mountain biking Company: Henry Schein, Inc. \nChester: Hobby: Surfing Company: Maxim Integrated \nWendell: Hobby: Surfing Company: Maxim Integrated \nDemetrius: Hobby: Mountain biking Company: Maxim Integrated \nJacob: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Maxim Integrated \n\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"It's nice to meet you, Esmeralda. I see you enjoy parties like these? I'm quite fond of such gatherings, tend to bump into people with shared acquaintances. It's almost like playing a game of Six Degree of Separation.\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"It's a pleasure to meet you, Miles! These gatherings do have a certain charm, don't they? You never know who you might come across. Speaking of shared acquaintances, do you have any particular hobbies? Or perhaps a company that you\u2019re closely associated with? I've found that such aspects often reveal mutual friends.\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Well Esmeralda, I'm a Chef, but cooking is not just a profession for me, it's my passion. I also enjoy tending to my kitchen garden. It keeps me calm and composed. Do you happen to know anyone keen on healthy living and enjoys adventurous hobbies, such as mountain biking or surfing? Perhaps they work at a place like Maxim Integrated or Henry Schein, Inc.?\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"You're a chef and also into gardening, that's impressive, Miles! Your life sounds quite balanced and full of vitality. Now that you mention Maxim Integrated, it rings a bell. I indeed have a friend, Jacob, who has a passion for shooting sports, and he also works at Maxim Integrated. Do you happen to know him?\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"Jacob at Maxim Integrated you say? The name does sound familiar. It\u2019s interesting that he's into shooting sports, quite adventurous! Just like my friends Chris and Demetrius who are huge fans of mountain biking. Maybe they have bumped into each other in their adventures!\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Well, your friends Chris and Demetrius certainly do have an adventurous passion. I think it's possible that they might have crossed paths with Jacob during some adventurous event. There's always a lot of overlapping in these close-knit circles, isn't there? Also, on another note, I was wondering if you have any connections with companies like BP or Gordon Food Service?\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins said: \"I am familiar with quite a lot of companies, Esmeralda, due to the nature of my work. But BP or Gordon Food Service doesn't quite ring a bell. More often, I work with local suppliers for fresh produce directly from farms or my own kitchen garden. By the way, Jacob from Maxim Integrated, does he ever participate in outdoor events related to his passion for shooting sports?\"\n\nTurn #7: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Indeed, Jacob does participate in outdoor events related to shooting sports. At times, he even takes part in various local and national shooting competitions. It's quite fascinating, his dedication. And who knows, perhaps your friends Chris and Demetrius might be aware of these events or even participants themselves, given their adventurous spirit. By the way, do any of your acquaintances have unconventional hobbies like, say, collecting elements or skateboarding perhaps?\"\n\nTurn #8: Miles Hawkins said: \"That's quite interesting, Esmeralda! Adventurous hobbies seem to connect us all in some sort of way, don't they? My friends, who I mentioned earlier, Chris and Demetrius, they are indeed part of this adventurous spirit too. And as for unconventional hobbies, a pal of mine, Chester, dabbles in surfing. Not as unconventional perhaps, but definitely requires creativity and balance. Maybe you've come across someone in your circle who is also into such activities?\"\n\nTurn #9: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Surfing indeed requires a lot of creativity, balance, and courage! That reminds me of my friend Lillian. She's got a knack for element collecting, which is quite unique. The patience and precision she brings to her hobby remind me of those necessary for surfing. Interesting how these different interests connect us. Perhaps your friend Chester has come across someone with such intriguing hobbies in his surfing community?\"\n\nTurn #10: Miles Hawkins said: \"Indeed, Esmeralda! Nothing like the swell of a good wave to stoke a surfer\u2019s spirit. Chester also likes to mention the relaxed, supportive community around surfing. They all respect and cheer for every brave soul riding the waves. And isn't it similar to Lillian collecting elements? The same dedication, discipline, and the sense of community in the end. Chester might have crossed paths with Lillian even without realizing. Such is the beauty of these gatherings, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #11: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Absolutely, Miles, the beauty of such gatherings is in the unexpected ways we find connections! Your friend Chester's sentiments about the surfing community indeed mirror Lillian's outlook towards her hobby. It's all about building bonds and celebrating each other's uniqueness. Maybe we should arrange for our friends to meet at one of these gatherings. They would have some wonderful stories to bond over!\"\n\nTurn #12: Miles Hawkins said: \"That's a great idea, Esmeralda. Bonding over shared passions and unique experiences is what makes these gatherings worthwhile. If our friends haven't crossed paths yet, they certainly should. With interesting life stories, they'll surely hit it off.\"\n\nTurn #13: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I completely agree, Miles. I always look forward to these occasions because of all the beautiful connections they create. And, I'm sure our friends would gratefully welcome the opportunity to expand their circles. It's been a pleasure chatting with you about our mutual connections, I'm looking forward to our next opportunity to discuss these shared interests and friends.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, Esmeralda, these connections make life all the more interesting. I'll certainly look forward to our next discussion, perhaps with some fresh perspectives from our friends. This conversation has been enlightening. Thank you for your delightful company tonight.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nEsmeralda Solis's background: \nMiles Hawkins's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nChris: Hobby: Mountain biking Company: Henry Schein, Inc. \nChester: Hobby: Surfing Company: Maxim Integrated \nWendell: Hobby: Surfing Company: Maxim Integrated \nDemetrius: Hobby: Mountain biking Company: Maxim Integrated \nJacob: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Maxim Integrated \n\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"It's nice to meet you, Esmeralda. I see you enjoy parties like these? I'm quite fond of such gatherings, tend to bump into people with shared acquaintances. It's almost like playing a game of Six Degree of Separation.\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"It's a pleasure to meet you, Miles! These gatherings do have a certain charm, don't they? You never know who you might come across. Speaking of shared acquaintances, do you have any particular hobbies? Or perhaps a company that you\u2019re closely associated with? I've found that such aspects often reveal mutual friends.\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Well Esmeralda, I'm a Chef, but cooking is not just a profession for me, it's my passion. I also enjoy tending to my kitchen garden. It keeps me calm and composed. Do you happen to know anyone keen on healthy living and enjoys adventurous hobbies, such as mountain biking or surfing? Perhaps they work at a place like Maxim Integrated or Henry Schein, Inc.?\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"You're a chef and also into gardening, that's impressive, Miles! Your life sounds quite balanced and full of vitality. Now that you mention Maxim Integrated, it rings a bell. I indeed have a friend, Jacob, who has a passion for shooting sports, and he also works at Maxim Integrated. Do you happen to know him?\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"Jacob at Maxim Integrated you say? The name does sound familiar. It\u2019s interesting that he's into shooting sports, quite adventurous! Just like my friends Chris and Demetrius who are huge fans of mountain biking. Maybe they have bumped into each other in their adventures!\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Well, your friends Chris and Demetrius certainly do have an adventurous passion. I think it's possible that they might have crossed paths with Jacob during some adventurous event. There's always a lot of overlapping in these close-knit circles, isn't there? Also, on another note, I was wondering if you have any connections with companies like BP or Gordon Food Service?\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins said: \"I am familiar with quite a lot of companies, Esmeralda, due to the nature of my work. But BP or Gordon Food Service doesn't quite ring a bell. More often, I work with local suppliers for fresh produce directly from farms or my own kitchen garden. By the way, Jacob from Maxim Integrated, does he ever participate in outdoor events related to his passion for shooting sports?\"\n\nTurn #7: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Indeed, Jacob does participate in outdoor events related to shooting sports. At times, he even takes part in various local and national shooting competitions. It's quite fascinating, his dedication. And who knows, perhaps your friends Chris and Demetrius might be aware of these events or even participants themselves, given their adventurous spirit. By the way, do any of your acquaintances have unconventional hobbies like, say, collecting elements or skateboarding perhaps?\"\n\nTurn #8: Miles Hawkins said: \"That's quite interesting, Esmeralda! Adventurous hobbies seem to connect us all in some sort of way, don't they? My friends, who I mentioned earlier, Chris and Demetrius, they are indeed part of this adventurous spirit too. And as for unconventional hobbies, a pal of mine, Chester, dabbles in surfing. Not as unconventional perhaps, but definitely requires creativity and balance. Maybe you've come across someone in your circle who is also into such activities?\"\n\nTurn #9: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Surfing indeed requires a lot of creativity, balance, and courage! That reminds me of my friend Lillian. She's got a knack for element collecting, which is quite unique. The patience and precision she brings to her hobby remind me of those necessary for surfing. Interesting how these different interests connect us. Perhaps your friend Chester has come across someone with such intriguing hobbies in his surfing community?\"\n\nTurn #10: Miles Hawkins said: \"Indeed, Esmeralda! Nothing like the swell of a good wave to stoke a surfer\u2019s spirit. Chester also likes to mention the relaxed, supportive community around surfing. They all respect and cheer for every brave soul riding the waves. And isn't it similar to Lillian collecting elements? The same dedication, discipline, and the sense of community in the end. Chester might have crossed paths with Lillian even without realizing. Such is the beauty of these gatherings, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #11: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Absolutely, Miles, the beauty of such gatherings is in the unexpected ways we find connections! Your friend Chester's sentiments about the surfing community indeed mirror Lillian's outlook towards her hobby. It's all about building bonds and celebrating each other's uniqueness. Maybe we should arrange for our friends to meet at one of these gatherings. They would have some wonderful stories to bond over!\"\n\nTurn #12: Miles Hawkins said: \"That's a great idea, Esmeralda. Bonding over shared passions and unique experiences is what makes these gatherings worthwhile. If our friends haven't crossed paths yet, they certainly should. With interesting life stories, they'll surely hit it off.\"\n\nTurn #13: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I completely agree, Miles. I always look forward to these occasions because of all the beautiful connections they create. And, I'm sure our friends would gratefully welcome the opportunity to expand their circles. It's been a pleasure chatting with you about our mutual connections, I'm looking forward to our next opportunity to discuss these shared interests and friends.\"\n\nTurn #14: Miles Hawkins said: \"Indeed, Esmeralda, these connections make life all the more interesting. I'll certainly look forward to our next discussion, perhaps with some fresh perspectives from our friends. This conversation has been enlightening. Thank you for your delightful company tonight.\"\n\nTurn #15: Esmeralda Solis said: \"And I share the same sentiments, Miles. It's the beauty of these connections and shared experiences that make gatherings like these so unforgettable. Thank you for such an enlightening conversation. Let us definitely revisit and continue enriching this thread in our next encounter. Until then, do enjoy the rest of the evening.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #16. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"The delight is mutual, Esmeralda. And yes, we must continue our interesting exploration of mutual connections in our future encounters. I'll endeavor to bring some of my friends too. Enjoy the rest of the evening!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Miles Hawkins, your task is to act/speak as Miles Hawkins would, keeping in mind Miles Hawkins's social goal.\nYou can find Miles Hawkins's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Miles Hawkins's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Miles Hawkins's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: Miles Hawkins is a 50-year-old male chef. He/him pronouns. Miles Hawkins, a chef, is a green thumb enthusiast and spends his free time tending to his kitchen garden, using some of his fresh produce in his dishes. Personality and values description: Miles Hawkins, spontaneous and free-spirited, values sanctity and benevolence. He is impulsive and relies on his instincts when making decisions. Miles's secrets: He's a recovering gambling addict.\nEsmeralda Solis's background: \nMiles Hawkins's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends: \nChris: Hobby: Mountain biking Company: Henry Schein, Inc. \nChester: Hobby: Surfing Company: Maxim Integrated \nWendell: Hobby: Surfing Company: Maxim Integrated \nDemetrius: Hobby: Mountain biking Company: Maxim Integrated \nJacob: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Maxim Integrated \n\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"It's nice to meet you, Esmeralda. I see you enjoy parties like these? I'm quite fond of such gatherings, tend to bump into people with shared acquaintances. It's almost like playing a game of Six Degree of Separation.\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"It's a pleasure to meet you, Miles! These gatherings do have a certain charm, don't they? You never know who you might come across. Speaking of shared acquaintances, do you have any particular hobbies? Or perhaps a company that you\u2019re closely associated with? I've found that such aspects often reveal mutual friends.\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Well Esmeralda, I'm a Chef, but cooking is not just a profession for me, it's my passion. I also enjoy tending to my kitchen garden. It keeps me calm and composed. Do you happen to know anyone keen on healthy living and enjoys adventurous hobbies, such as mountain biking or surfing? Perhaps they work at a place like Maxim Integrated or Henry Schein, Inc.?\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"You're a chef and also into gardening, that's impressive, Miles! Your life sounds quite balanced and full of vitality. Now that you mention Maxim Integrated, it rings a bell. I indeed have a friend, Jacob, who has a passion for shooting sports, and he also works at Maxim Integrated. Do you happen to know him?\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"Jacob at Maxim Integrated you say? The name does sound familiar. It\u2019s interesting that he's into shooting sports, quite adventurous! Just like my friends Chris and Demetrius who are huge fans of mountain biking. Maybe they have bumped into each other in their adventures!\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Well, your friends Chris and Demetrius certainly do have an adventurous passion. I think it's possible that they might have crossed paths with Jacob during some adventurous event. There's always a lot of overlapping in these close-knit circles, isn't there? Also, on another note, I was wondering if you have any connections with companies like BP or Gordon Food Service?\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins said: \"I am familiar with quite a lot of companies, Esmeralda, due to the nature of my work. But BP or Gordon Food Service doesn't quite ring a bell. More often, I work with local suppliers for fresh produce directly from farms or my own kitchen garden. By the way, Jacob from Maxim Integrated, does he ever participate in outdoor events related to his passion for shooting sports?\"\n\nTurn #7: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Indeed, Jacob does participate in outdoor events related to shooting sports. At times, he even takes part in various local and national shooting competitions. It's quite fascinating, his dedication. And who knows, perhaps your friends Chris and Demetrius might be aware of these events or even participants themselves, given their adventurous spirit. By the way, do any of your acquaintances have unconventional hobbies like, say, collecting elements or skateboarding perhaps?\"\n\nTurn #8: Miles Hawkins said: \"That's quite interesting, Esmeralda! Adventurous hobbies seem to connect us all in some sort of way, don't they? My friends, who I mentioned earlier, Chris and Demetrius, they are indeed part of this adventurous spirit too. And as for unconventional hobbies, a pal of mine, Chester, dabbles in surfing. Not as unconventional perhaps, but definitely requires creativity and balance. Maybe you've come across someone in your circle who is also into such activities?\"\n\nTurn #9: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Surfing indeed requires a lot of creativity, balance, and courage! That reminds me of my friend Lillian. She's got a knack for element collecting, which is quite unique. The patience and precision she brings to her hobby remind me of those necessary for surfing. Interesting how these different interests connect us. Perhaps your friend Chester has come across someone with such intriguing hobbies in his surfing community?\"\n\nTurn #10: Miles Hawkins said: \"Indeed, Esmeralda! Nothing like the swell of a good wave to stoke a surfer\u2019s spirit. Chester also likes to mention the relaxed, supportive community around surfing. They all respect and cheer for every brave soul riding the waves. And isn't it similar to Lillian collecting elements? The same dedication, discipline, and the sense of community in the end. Chester might have crossed paths with Lillian even without realizing. Such is the beauty of these gatherings, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #11: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Absolutely, Miles, the beauty of such gatherings is in the unexpected ways we find connections! Your friend Chester's sentiments about the surfing community indeed mirror Lillian's outlook towards her hobby. It's all about building bonds and celebrating each other's uniqueness. Maybe we should arrange for our friends to meet at one of these gatherings. They would have some wonderful stories to bond over!\"\n\nTurn #12: Miles Hawkins said: \"That's a great idea, Esmeralda. Bonding over shared passions and unique experiences is what makes these gatherings worthwhile. If our friends haven't crossed paths yet, they certainly should. With interesting life stories, they'll surely hit it off.\"\n\nTurn #13: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I completely agree, Miles. I always look forward to these occasions because of all the beautiful connections they create. And, I'm sure our friends would gratefully welcome the opportunity to expand their circles. It's been a pleasure chatting with you about our mutual connections, I'm looking forward to our next opportunity to discuss these shared interests and friends.\"\n\nTurn #14: Miles Hawkins said: \"Indeed, Esmeralda, these connections make life all the more interesting. I'll certainly look forward to our next discussion, perhaps with some fresh perspectives from our friends. This conversation has been enlightening. Thank you for your delightful company tonight.\"\n\nTurn #15: Esmeralda Solis said: \"And I share the same sentiments, Miles. It's the beauty of these connections and shared experiences that make gatherings like these so unforgettable. Thank you for such an enlightening conversation. Let us definitely revisit and continue enriching this thread in our next encounter. Until then, do enjoy the rest of the evening.\"\n\nTurn #16: Miles Hawkins said: \"The delight is mutual, Esmeralda. And yes, we must continue our interesting exploration of mutual connections in our future encounters. I'll endeavor to bring some of my friends too. Enjoy the rest of the evening!\"\n\nTurn #17: Esmeralda Solis left the conversation\n.\nYou are at Turn #18. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'none', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends \nJoseph: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: BP \nLillian: Hobby: Element collecting Company: Gordon Food Service \nVivian: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Gordon Food Service \nMurray: Hobby: Skateboarding Company: BP \nJacob: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Maxim Integrated\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"It's nice to meet you, Esmeralda. I see you enjoy parties like these? I'm quite fond of such gatherings, tend to bump into people with shared acquaintances. It's almost like playing a game of Six Degree of Separation.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #1. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"It's a pleasure to meet you, Miles! These gatherings do have a certain charm, don't they? You never know who you might come across. Speaking of shared acquaintances, do you have any particular hobbies? Or perhaps a company that you\u2019re closely associated with? I've found that such aspects often reveal mutual friends.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends \nJoseph: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: BP \nLillian: Hobby: Element collecting Company: Gordon Food Service \nVivian: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Gordon Food Service \nMurray: Hobby: Skateboarding Company: BP \nJacob: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Maxim Integrated\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"It's nice to meet you, Esmeralda. I see you enjoy parties like these? I'm quite fond of such gatherings, tend to bump into people with shared acquaintances. It's almost like playing a game of Six Degree of Separation.\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"It's a pleasure to meet you, Miles! These gatherings do have a certain charm, don't they? You never know who you might come across. Speaking of shared acquaintances, do you have any particular hobbies? Or perhaps a company that you\u2019re closely associated with? I've found that such aspects often reveal mutual friends.\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Well Esmeralda, I'm a Chef, but cooking is not just a profession for me, it's my passion. I also enjoy tending to my kitchen garden. It keeps me calm and composed. Do you happen to know anyone keen on healthy living and enjoys adventurous hobbies, such as mountain biking or surfing? Perhaps they work at a place like Maxim Integrated or Henry Schein, Inc.?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #3. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"You're a chef and also into gardening, that's impressive, Miles! Your life sounds quite balanced and full of vitality. Now that you mention Maxim Integrated, it rings a bell. I indeed have a friend, Jacob, who has a passion for shooting sports, and he also works at Maxim Integrated. Do you happen to know him?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends \nJoseph: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: BP \nLillian: Hobby: Element collecting Company: Gordon Food Service \nVivian: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Gordon Food Service \nMurray: Hobby: Skateboarding Company: BP \nJacob: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Maxim Integrated\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"It's nice to meet you, Esmeralda. I see you enjoy parties like these? I'm quite fond of such gatherings, tend to bump into people with shared acquaintances. It's almost like playing a game of Six Degree of Separation.\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"It's a pleasure to meet you, Miles! These gatherings do have a certain charm, don't they? You never know who you might come across. Speaking of shared acquaintances, do you have any particular hobbies? Or perhaps a company that you\u2019re closely associated with? I've found that such aspects often reveal mutual friends.\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Well Esmeralda, I'm a Chef, but cooking is not just a profession for me, it's my passion. I also enjoy tending to my kitchen garden. It keeps me calm and composed. Do you happen to know anyone keen on healthy living and enjoys adventurous hobbies, such as mountain biking or surfing? Perhaps they work at a place like Maxim Integrated or Henry Schein, Inc.?\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"You're a chef and also into gardening, that's impressive, Miles! Your life sounds quite balanced and full of vitality. Now that you mention Maxim Integrated, it rings a bell. I indeed have a friend, Jacob, who has a passion for shooting sports, and he also works at Maxim Integrated. Do you happen to know him?\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"Jacob at Maxim Integrated you say? The name does sound familiar. It\u2019s interesting that he's into shooting sports, quite adventurous! Just like my friends Chris and Demetrius who are huge fans of mountain biking. Maybe they have bumped into each other in their adventures!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #5. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Well, your friends Chris and Demetrius certainly do have an adventurous passion. I think it's possible that they might have crossed paths with Jacob during some adventurous event. There's always a lot of overlapping in these close-knit circles, isn't there? Also, on another note, I was wondering if you have any connections with companies like BP or Gordon Food Service?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends \nJoseph: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: BP \nLillian: Hobby: Element collecting Company: Gordon Food Service \nVivian: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Gordon Food Service \nMurray: Hobby: Skateboarding Company: BP \nJacob: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Maxim Integrated\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"It's nice to meet you, Esmeralda. I see you enjoy parties like these? I'm quite fond of such gatherings, tend to bump into people with shared acquaintances. It's almost like playing a game of Six Degree of Separation.\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"It's a pleasure to meet you, Miles! These gatherings do have a certain charm, don't they? You never know who you might come across. Speaking of shared acquaintances, do you have any particular hobbies? Or perhaps a company that you\u2019re closely associated with? I've found that such aspects often reveal mutual friends.\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Well Esmeralda, I'm a Chef, but cooking is not just a profession for me, it's my passion. I also enjoy tending to my kitchen garden. It keeps me calm and composed. Do you happen to know anyone keen on healthy living and enjoys adventurous hobbies, such as mountain biking or surfing? Perhaps they work at a place like Maxim Integrated or Henry Schein, Inc.?\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"You're a chef and also into gardening, that's impressive, Miles! Your life sounds quite balanced and full of vitality. Now that you mention Maxim Integrated, it rings a bell. I indeed have a friend, Jacob, who has a passion for shooting sports, and he also works at Maxim Integrated. Do you happen to know him?\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"Jacob at Maxim Integrated you say? The name does sound familiar. It\u2019s interesting that he's into shooting sports, quite adventurous! Just like my friends Chris and Demetrius who are huge fans of mountain biking. Maybe they have bumped into each other in their adventures!\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Well, your friends Chris and Demetrius certainly do have an adventurous passion. I think it's possible that they might have crossed paths with Jacob during some adventurous event. There's always a lot of overlapping in these close-knit circles, isn't there? Also, on another note, I was wondering if you have any connections with companies like BP or Gordon Food Service?\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins said: \"I am familiar with quite a lot of companies, Esmeralda, due to the nature of my work. But BP or Gordon Food Service doesn't quite ring a bell. More often, I work with local suppliers for fresh produce directly from farms or my own kitchen garden. By the way, Jacob from Maxim Integrated, does he ever participate in outdoor events related to his passion for shooting sports?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #7. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Indeed, Jacob does participate in outdoor events related to shooting sports. At times, he even takes part in various local and national shooting competitions. It's quite fascinating, his dedication. And who knows, perhaps your friends Chris and Demetrius might be aware of these events or even participants themselves, given their adventurous spirit. By the way, do any of your acquaintances have unconventional hobbies like, say, collecting elements or skateboarding perhaps?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends \nJoseph: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: BP \nLillian: Hobby: Element collecting Company: Gordon Food Service \nVivian: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Gordon Food Service \nMurray: Hobby: Skateboarding Company: BP \nJacob: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Maxim Integrated\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"It's nice to meet you, Esmeralda. I see you enjoy parties like these? I'm quite fond of such gatherings, tend to bump into people with shared acquaintances. It's almost like playing a game of Six Degree of Separation.\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"It's a pleasure to meet you, Miles! These gatherings do have a certain charm, don't they? You never know who you might come across. Speaking of shared acquaintances, do you have any particular hobbies? Or perhaps a company that you\u2019re closely associated with? I've found that such aspects often reveal mutual friends.\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Well Esmeralda, I'm a Chef, but cooking is not just a profession for me, it's my passion. I also enjoy tending to my kitchen garden. It keeps me calm and composed. Do you happen to know anyone keen on healthy living and enjoys adventurous hobbies, such as mountain biking or surfing? Perhaps they work at a place like Maxim Integrated or Henry Schein, Inc.?\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"You're a chef and also into gardening, that's impressive, Miles! Your life sounds quite balanced and full of vitality. Now that you mention Maxim Integrated, it rings a bell. I indeed have a friend, Jacob, who has a passion for shooting sports, and he also works at Maxim Integrated. Do you happen to know him?\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"Jacob at Maxim Integrated you say? The name does sound familiar. It\u2019s interesting that he's into shooting sports, quite adventurous! Just like my friends Chris and Demetrius who are huge fans of mountain biking. Maybe they have bumped into each other in their adventures!\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Well, your friends Chris and Demetrius certainly do have an adventurous passion. I think it's possible that they might have crossed paths with Jacob during some adventurous event. There's always a lot of overlapping in these close-knit circles, isn't there? Also, on another note, I was wondering if you have any connections with companies like BP or Gordon Food Service?\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins said: \"I am familiar with quite a lot of companies, Esmeralda, due to the nature of my work. But BP or Gordon Food Service doesn't quite ring a bell. More often, I work with local suppliers for fresh produce directly from farms or my own kitchen garden. By the way, Jacob from Maxim Integrated, does he ever participate in outdoor events related to his passion for shooting sports?\"\n\nTurn #7: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Indeed, Jacob does participate in outdoor events related to shooting sports. At times, he even takes part in various local and national shooting competitions. It's quite fascinating, his dedication. And who knows, perhaps your friends Chris and Demetrius might be aware of these events or even participants themselves, given their adventurous spirit. By the way, do any of your acquaintances have unconventional hobbies like, say, collecting elements or skateboarding perhaps?\"\n\nTurn #8: Miles Hawkins said: \"That's quite interesting, Esmeralda! Adventurous hobbies seem to connect us all in some sort of way, don't they? My friends, who I mentioned earlier, Chris and Demetrius, they are indeed part of this adventurous spirit too. And as for unconventional hobbies, a pal of mine, Chester, dabbles in surfing. Not as unconventional perhaps, but definitely requires creativity and balance. Maybe you've come across someone in your circle who is also into such activities?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #9. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Surfing indeed requires a lot of creativity, balance, and courage! That reminds me of my friend Lillian. She's got a knack for element collecting, which is quite unique. The patience and precision she brings to her hobby remind me of those necessary for surfing. Interesting how these different interests connect us. Perhaps your friend Chester has come across someone with such intriguing hobbies in his surfing community?\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends \nJoseph: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: BP \nLillian: Hobby: Element collecting Company: Gordon Food Service \nVivian: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Gordon Food Service \nMurray: Hobby: Skateboarding Company: BP \nJacob: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Maxim Integrated\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"It's nice to meet you, Esmeralda. I see you enjoy parties like these? I'm quite fond of such gatherings, tend to bump into people with shared acquaintances. It's almost like playing a game of Six Degree of Separation.\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"It's a pleasure to meet you, Miles! These gatherings do have a certain charm, don't they? You never know who you might come across. Speaking of shared acquaintances, do you have any particular hobbies? Or perhaps a company that you\u2019re closely associated with? I've found that such aspects often reveal mutual friends.\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Well Esmeralda, I'm a Chef, but cooking is not just a profession for me, it's my passion. I also enjoy tending to my kitchen garden. It keeps me calm and composed. Do you happen to know anyone keen on healthy living and enjoys adventurous hobbies, such as mountain biking or surfing? Perhaps they work at a place like Maxim Integrated or Henry Schein, Inc.?\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"You're a chef and also into gardening, that's impressive, Miles! Your life sounds quite balanced and full of vitality. Now that you mention Maxim Integrated, it rings a bell. I indeed have a friend, Jacob, who has a passion for shooting sports, and he also works at Maxim Integrated. Do you happen to know him?\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"Jacob at Maxim Integrated you say? The name does sound familiar. It\u2019s interesting that he's into shooting sports, quite adventurous! Just like my friends Chris and Demetrius who are huge fans of mountain biking. Maybe they have bumped into each other in their adventures!\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Well, your friends Chris and Demetrius certainly do have an adventurous passion. I think it's possible that they might have crossed paths with Jacob during some adventurous event. There's always a lot of overlapping in these close-knit circles, isn't there? Also, on another note, I was wondering if you have any connections with companies like BP or Gordon Food Service?\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins said: \"I am familiar with quite a lot of companies, Esmeralda, due to the nature of my work. But BP or Gordon Food Service doesn't quite ring a bell. More often, I work with local suppliers for fresh produce directly from farms or my own kitchen garden. By the way, Jacob from Maxim Integrated, does he ever participate in outdoor events related to his passion for shooting sports?\"\n\nTurn #7: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Indeed, Jacob does participate in outdoor events related to shooting sports. At times, he even takes part in various local and national shooting competitions. It's quite fascinating, his dedication. And who knows, perhaps your friends Chris and Demetrius might be aware of these events or even participants themselves, given their adventurous spirit. By the way, do any of your acquaintances have unconventional hobbies like, say, collecting elements or skateboarding perhaps?\"\n\nTurn #8: Miles Hawkins said: \"That's quite interesting, Esmeralda! Adventurous hobbies seem to connect us all in some sort of way, don't they? My friends, who I mentioned earlier, Chris and Demetrius, they are indeed part of this adventurous spirit too. And as for unconventional hobbies, a pal of mine, Chester, dabbles in surfing. Not as unconventional perhaps, but definitely requires creativity and balance. Maybe you've come across someone in your circle who is also into such activities?\"\n\nTurn #9: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Surfing indeed requires a lot of creativity, balance, and courage! That reminds me of my friend Lillian. She's got a knack for element collecting, which is quite unique. The patience and precision she brings to her hobby remind me of those necessary for surfing. Interesting how these different interests connect us. Perhaps your friend Chester has come across someone with such intriguing hobbies in his surfing community?\"\n\nTurn #10: Miles Hawkins said: \"Indeed, Esmeralda! Nothing like the swell of a good wave to stoke a surfer\u2019s spirit. Chester also likes to mention the relaxed, supportive community around surfing. They all respect and cheer for every brave soul riding the waves. And isn't it similar to Lillian collecting elements? The same dedication, discipline, and the sense of community in the end. Chester might have crossed paths with Lillian even without realizing. Such is the beauty of these gatherings, isn't it?\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #11. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"Absolutely, Miles, the beauty of such gatherings is in the unexpected ways we find connections! Your friend Chester's sentiments about the surfing community indeed mirror Lillian's outlook towards her hobby. It's all about building bonds and celebrating each other's uniqueness. Maybe we should arrange for our friends to meet at one of these gatherings. They would have some wonderful stories to bond over!\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends \nJoseph: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: BP \nLillian: Hobby: Element collecting Company: Gordon Food Service \nVivian: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Gordon Food Service \nMurray: Hobby: Skateboarding Company: BP \nJacob: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Maxim Integrated\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"It's nice to meet you, Esmeralda. I see you enjoy parties like these? I'm quite fond of such gatherings, tend to bump into people with shared acquaintances. It's almost like playing a game of Six Degree of Separation.\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"It's a pleasure to meet you, Miles! These gatherings do have a certain charm, don't they? You never know who you might come across. Speaking of shared acquaintances, do you have any particular hobbies? Or perhaps a company that you\u2019re closely associated with? I've found that such aspects often reveal mutual friends.\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Well Esmeralda, I'm a Chef, but cooking is not just a profession for me, it's my passion. I also enjoy tending to my kitchen garden. It keeps me calm and composed. Do you happen to know anyone keen on healthy living and enjoys adventurous hobbies, such as mountain biking or surfing? Perhaps they work at a place like Maxim Integrated or Henry Schein, Inc.?\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"You're a chef and also into gardening, that's impressive, Miles! Your life sounds quite balanced and full of vitality. Now that you mention Maxim Integrated, it rings a bell. I indeed have a friend, Jacob, who has a passion for shooting sports, and he also works at Maxim Integrated. Do you happen to know him?\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"Jacob at Maxim Integrated you say? The name does sound familiar. It\u2019s interesting that he's into shooting sports, quite adventurous! Just like my friends Chris and Demetrius who are huge fans of mountain biking. Maybe they have bumped into each other in their adventures!\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Well, your friends Chris and Demetrius certainly do have an adventurous passion. I think it's possible that they might have crossed paths with Jacob during some adventurous event. There's always a lot of overlapping in these close-knit circles, isn't there? Also, on another note, I was wondering if you have any connections with companies like BP or Gordon Food Service?\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins said: \"I am familiar with quite a lot of companies, Esmeralda, due to the nature of my work. But BP or Gordon Food Service doesn't quite ring a bell. More often, I work with local suppliers for fresh produce directly from farms or my own kitchen garden. By the way, Jacob from Maxim Integrated, does he ever participate in outdoor events related to his passion for shooting sports?\"\n\nTurn #7: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Indeed, Jacob does participate in outdoor events related to shooting sports. At times, he even takes part in various local and national shooting competitions. It's quite fascinating, his dedication. And who knows, perhaps your friends Chris and Demetrius might be aware of these events or even participants themselves, given their adventurous spirit. By the way, do any of your acquaintances have unconventional hobbies like, say, collecting elements or skateboarding perhaps?\"\n\nTurn #8: Miles Hawkins said: \"That's quite interesting, Esmeralda! Adventurous hobbies seem to connect us all in some sort of way, don't they? My friends, who I mentioned earlier, Chris and Demetrius, they are indeed part of this adventurous spirit too. And as for unconventional hobbies, a pal of mine, Chester, dabbles in surfing. Not as unconventional perhaps, but definitely requires creativity and balance. Maybe you've come across someone in your circle who is also into such activities?\"\n\nTurn #9: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Surfing indeed requires a lot of creativity, balance, and courage! That reminds me of my friend Lillian. She's got a knack for element collecting, which is quite unique. The patience and precision she brings to her hobby remind me of those necessary for surfing. Interesting how these different interests connect us. Perhaps your friend Chester has come across someone with such intriguing hobbies in his surfing community?\"\n\nTurn #10: Miles Hawkins said: \"Indeed, Esmeralda! Nothing like the swell of a good wave to stoke a surfer\u2019s spirit. Chester also likes to mention the relaxed, supportive community around surfing. They all respect and cheer for every brave soul riding the waves. And isn't it similar to Lillian collecting elements? The same dedication, discipline, and the sense of community in the end. Chester might have crossed paths with Lillian even without realizing. Such is the beauty of these gatherings, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #11: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Absolutely, Miles, the beauty of such gatherings is in the unexpected ways we find connections! Your friend Chester's sentiments about the surfing community indeed mirror Lillian's outlook towards her hobby. It's all about building bonds and celebrating each other's uniqueness. Maybe we should arrange for our friends to meet at one of these gatherings. They would have some wonderful stories to bond over!\"\n\nTurn #12: Miles Hawkins said: \"That's a great idea, Esmeralda. Bonding over shared passions and unique experiences is what makes these gatherings worthwhile. If our friends haven't crossed paths yet, they certainly should. With interesting life stories, they'll surely hit it off.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #13. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"I completely agree, Miles. I always look forward to these occasions because of all the beautiful connections they create. And, I'm sure our friends would gratefully welcome the opportunity to expand their circles. It's been a pleasure chatting with you about our mutual connections, I'm looking forward to our next opportunity to discuss these shared interests and friends.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends \nJoseph: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: BP \nLillian: Hobby: Element collecting Company: Gordon Food Service \nVivian: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Gordon Food Service \nMurray: Hobby: Skateboarding Company: BP \nJacob: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Maxim Integrated\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"It's nice to meet you, Esmeralda. I see you enjoy parties like these? I'm quite fond of such gatherings, tend to bump into people with shared acquaintances. It's almost like playing a game of Six Degree of Separation.\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"It's a pleasure to meet you, Miles! These gatherings do have a certain charm, don't they? You never know who you might come across. Speaking of shared acquaintances, do you have any particular hobbies? Or perhaps a company that you\u2019re closely associated with? I've found that such aspects often reveal mutual friends.\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Well Esmeralda, I'm a Chef, but cooking is not just a profession for me, it's my passion. I also enjoy tending to my kitchen garden. It keeps me calm and composed. Do you happen to know anyone keen on healthy living and enjoys adventurous hobbies, such as mountain biking or surfing? Perhaps they work at a place like Maxim Integrated or Henry Schein, Inc.?\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"You're a chef and also into gardening, that's impressive, Miles! Your life sounds quite balanced and full of vitality. Now that you mention Maxim Integrated, it rings a bell. I indeed have a friend, Jacob, who has a passion for shooting sports, and he also works at Maxim Integrated. Do you happen to know him?\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"Jacob at Maxim Integrated you say? The name does sound familiar. It\u2019s interesting that he's into shooting sports, quite adventurous! Just like my friends Chris and Demetrius who are huge fans of mountain biking. Maybe they have bumped into each other in their adventures!\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Well, your friends Chris and Demetrius certainly do have an adventurous passion. I think it's possible that they might have crossed paths with Jacob during some adventurous event. There's always a lot of overlapping in these close-knit circles, isn't there? Also, on another note, I was wondering if you have any connections with companies like BP or Gordon Food Service?\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins said: \"I am familiar with quite a lot of companies, Esmeralda, due to the nature of my work. But BP or Gordon Food Service doesn't quite ring a bell. More often, I work with local suppliers for fresh produce directly from farms or my own kitchen garden. By the way, Jacob from Maxim Integrated, does he ever participate in outdoor events related to his passion for shooting sports?\"\n\nTurn #7: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Indeed, Jacob does participate in outdoor events related to shooting sports. At times, he even takes part in various local and national shooting competitions. It's quite fascinating, his dedication. And who knows, perhaps your friends Chris and Demetrius might be aware of these events or even participants themselves, given their adventurous spirit. By the way, do any of your acquaintances have unconventional hobbies like, say, collecting elements or skateboarding perhaps?\"\n\nTurn #8: Miles Hawkins said: \"That's quite interesting, Esmeralda! Adventurous hobbies seem to connect us all in some sort of way, don't they? My friends, who I mentioned earlier, Chris and Demetrius, they are indeed part of this adventurous spirit too. And as for unconventional hobbies, a pal of mine, Chester, dabbles in surfing. Not as unconventional perhaps, but definitely requires creativity and balance. Maybe you've come across someone in your circle who is also into such activities?\"\n\nTurn #9: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Surfing indeed requires a lot of creativity, balance, and courage! That reminds me of my friend Lillian. She's got a knack for element collecting, which is quite unique. The patience and precision she brings to her hobby remind me of those necessary for surfing. Interesting how these different interests connect us. Perhaps your friend Chester has come across someone with such intriguing hobbies in his surfing community?\"\n\nTurn #10: Miles Hawkins said: \"Indeed, Esmeralda! Nothing like the swell of a good wave to stoke a surfer\u2019s spirit. Chester also likes to mention the relaxed, supportive community around surfing. They all respect and cheer for every brave soul riding the waves. And isn't it similar to Lillian collecting elements? The same dedication, discipline, and the sense of community in the end. Chester might have crossed paths with Lillian even without realizing. Such is the beauty of these gatherings, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #11: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Absolutely, Miles, the beauty of such gatherings is in the unexpected ways we find connections! Your friend Chester's sentiments about the surfing community indeed mirror Lillian's outlook towards her hobby. It's all about building bonds and celebrating each other's uniqueness. Maybe we should arrange for our friends to meet at one of these gatherings. They would have some wonderful stories to bond over!\"\n\nTurn #12: Miles Hawkins said: \"That's a great idea, Esmeralda. Bonding over shared passions and unique experiences is what makes these gatherings worthwhile. If our friends haven't crossed paths yet, they certainly should. With interesting life stories, they'll surely hit it off.\"\n\nTurn #13: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I completely agree, Miles. I always look forward to these occasions because of all the beautiful connections they create. And, I'm sure our friends would gratefully welcome the opportunity to expand their circles. It's been a pleasure chatting with you about our mutual connections, I'm looking forward to our next opportunity to discuss these shared interests and friends.\"\n\nTurn #14: Miles Hawkins said: \"Indeed, Esmeralda, these connections make life all the more interesting. I'll certainly look forward to our next discussion, perhaps with some fresh perspectives from our friends. This conversation has been enlightening. Thank you for your delightful company tonight.\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #15. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"And I share the same sentiments, Miles. It's the beauty of these connections and shared experiences that make gatherings like these so unforgettable. Thank you for such an enlightening conversation. Let us definitely revisit and continue enriching this thread in our next encounter. Until then, do enjoy the rest of the evening.\"}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Esmeralda Solis, your task is to act/speak as Esmeralda Solis would, keeping in mind Esmeralda Solis's social goal.\nYou can find Esmeralda Solis's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Esmeralda Solis's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Esmeralda Solis's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: 2 strangers are meeting at a party. \nParticipants: Miles Hawkins and Esmeralda Solis\nMiles Hawkins's background: \nEsmeralda Solis's background: Esmeralda Solis is a 45-year-old female district attorney. She/her pronouns. Esmeralda Solis is an accomplished District Attorney who has a weakness for ballroom dancing and enjoys practising in her leisure time. Personality and values description: Esmeralda Solis, known for her creativity and extraversion, values authority and liberty. She makes strategic, decisive decisions. Esmeralda's secrets: Has undisclosed romantic relationships with several high-profile criminals\nMiles Hawkins's goal: Unknown\nEsmeralda Solis's goal: You are trying to figure out whether you have a mutual friend with the other person. You should not simply list their names.\nYou know the following friends \nJoseph: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: BP \nLillian: Hobby: Element collecting Company: Gordon Food Service \nVivian: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Gordon Food Service \nMurray: Hobby: Skateboarding Company: BP \nJacob: Hobby: Shooting sport Company: Maxim Integrated\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Miles Hawkins said: \"It's nice to meet you, Esmeralda. I see you enjoy parties like these? I'm quite fond of such gatherings, tend to bump into people with shared acquaintances. It's almost like playing a game of Six Degree of Separation.\"\n\nTurn #1: Esmeralda Solis said: \"It's a pleasure to meet you, Miles! These gatherings do have a certain charm, don't they? You never know who you might come across. Speaking of shared acquaintances, do you have any particular hobbies? Or perhaps a company that you\u2019re closely associated with? I've found that such aspects often reveal mutual friends.\"\n\nTurn #2: Miles Hawkins said: \"Well Esmeralda, I'm a Chef, but cooking is not just a profession for me, it's my passion. I also enjoy tending to my kitchen garden. It keeps me calm and composed. Do you happen to know anyone keen on healthy living and enjoys adventurous hobbies, such as mountain biking or surfing? Perhaps they work at a place like Maxim Integrated or Henry Schein, Inc.?\"\n\nTurn #3: Esmeralda Solis said: \"You're a chef and also into gardening, that's impressive, Miles! Your life sounds quite balanced and full of vitality. Now that you mention Maxim Integrated, it rings a bell. I indeed have a friend, Jacob, who has a passion for shooting sports, and he also works at Maxim Integrated. Do you happen to know him?\"\n\nTurn #4: Miles Hawkins said: \"Jacob at Maxim Integrated you say? The name does sound familiar. It\u2019s interesting that he's into shooting sports, quite adventurous! Just like my friends Chris and Demetrius who are huge fans of mountain biking. Maybe they have bumped into each other in their adventures!\"\n\nTurn #5: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Well, your friends Chris and Demetrius certainly do have an adventurous passion. I think it's possible that they might have crossed paths with Jacob during some adventurous event. There's always a lot of overlapping in these close-knit circles, isn't there? Also, on another note, I was wondering if you have any connections with companies like BP or Gordon Food Service?\"\n\nTurn #6: Miles Hawkins said: \"I am familiar with quite a lot of companies, Esmeralda, due to the nature of my work. But BP or Gordon Food Service doesn't quite ring a bell. More often, I work with local suppliers for fresh produce directly from farms or my own kitchen garden. By the way, Jacob from Maxim Integrated, does he ever participate in outdoor events related to his passion for shooting sports?\"\n\nTurn #7: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Indeed, Jacob does participate in outdoor events related to shooting sports. At times, he even takes part in various local and national shooting competitions. It's quite fascinating, his dedication. And who knows, perhaps your friends Chris and Demetrius might be aware of these events or even participants themselves, given their adventurous spirit. By the way, do any of your acquaintances have unconventional hobbies like, say, collecting elements or skateboarding perhaps?\"\n\nTurn #8: Miles Hawkins said: \"That's quite interesting, Esmeralda! Adventurous hobbies seem to connect us all in some sort of way, don't they? My friends, who I mentioned earlier, Chris and Demetrius, they are indeed part of this adventurous spirit too. And as for unconventional hobbies, a pal of mine, Chester, dabbles in surfing. Not as unconventional perhaps, but definitely requires creativity and balance. Maybe you've come across someone in your circle who is also into such activities?\"\n\nTurn #9: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Surfing indeed requires a lot of creativity, balance, and courage! That reminds me of my friend Lillian. She's got a knack for element collecting, which is quite unique. The patience and precision she brings to her hobby remind me of those necessary for surfing. Interesting how these different interests connect us. Perhaps your friend Chester has come across someone with such intriguing hobbies in his surfing community?\"\n\nTurn #10: Miles Hawkins said: \"Indeed, Esmeralda! Nothing like the swell of a good wave to stoke a surfer\u2019s spirit. Chester also likes to mention the relaxed, supportive community around surfing. They all respect and cheer for every brave soul riding the waves. And isn't it similar to Lillian collecting elements? The same dedication, discipline, and the sense of community in the end. Chester might have crossed paths with Lillian even without realizing. Such is the beauty of these gatherings, isn't it?\"\n\nTurn #11: Esmeralda Solis said: \"Absolutely, Miles, the beauty of such gatherings is in the unexpected ways we find connections! Your friend Chester's sentiments about the surfing community indeed mirror Lillian's outlook towards her hobby. It's all about building bonds and celebrating each other's uniqueness. Maybe we should arrange for our friends to meet at one of these gatherings. They would have some wonderful stories to bond over!\"\n\nTurn #12: Miles Hawkins said: \"That's a great idea, Esmeralda. Bonding over shared passions and unique experiences is what makes these gatherings worthwhile. If our friends haven't crossed paths yet, they certainly should. With interesting life stories, they'll surely hit it off.\"\n\nTurn #13: Esmeralda Solis said: \"I completely agree, Miles. I always look forward to these occasions because of all the beautiful connections they create. And, I'm sure our friends would gratefully welcome the opportunity to expand their circles. It's been a pleasure chatting with you about our mutual connections, I'm looking forward to our next opportunity to discuss these shared interests and friends.\"\n\nTurn #14: Miles Hawkins said: \"Indeed, Esmeralda, these connections make life all the more interesting. I'll certainly look forward to our next discussion, perhaps with some fresh perspectives from our friends. This conversation has been enlightening. Thank you for your delightful company tonight.\"\n\nTurn #15: Esmeralda Solis said: \"And I share the same sentiments, Miles. It's the beauty of these connections and shared experiences that make gatherings like these so unforgettable. Thank you for such an enlightening conversation. Let us definitely revisit and continue enriching this thread in our next encounter. Until then, do enjoy the rest of the evening.\"\n\nTurn #16: Miles Hawkins said: \"The delight is mutual, Esmeralda. And yes, we must continue our interesting exploration of mutual connections in our future encounters. I'll endeavor to bring some of my friends too. Enjoy the rest of the evening!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #17. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'leave', 'argument': ''}"}, {"instruction": "Prompt after formatting:\nImagine you are Lily Greenberg, your task is to act/speak as Lily Greenberg would, keeping in mind Lily Greenberg's social goal.\nYou can find Lily Greenberg's background and goal in the 'Here is the context of the interaction' field.\nNote that Lily Greenberg's secret and goal is only visible to you.\nYou should try your best to achieve Lily Greenberg's goal in a way that align with their character traits.\nAdditionally, maintaining the conversation's naturalness and realism is essential (e.g., do not repeat what other people has already said before).\n\nHere is the context of this interaction:\nScenario: One person is offering an Antique Chair for $15.0, while another person is interested in purchasing it. Here's what you need to know about the item: it's a beautifully carved antique wooden chair. It's in good condition, but could probably benefit from a fresh seat cushion.\nParticipants: Lily Greenberg and Lena Goodwin\nLily Greenberg's background: Lily Greenberg is a 45-year-old female lawyer. She/her pronouns. Lily Greenberg is a hard-working and successful lawyer. Personality and values description: Lily Greenberg, a strong respecter of rules and schedules, values authority and loyalty. She approaches decisions rationally and practically. Lily's secrets: She anonymously donates to charity.\nLena Goodwin's background: \nLily Greenberg's goal: You are the buyer for this item, and your target price is $9.0. If you purchase it at a significantly higher price, be aware that you will incur a penalty. However, if you manage to buy it for less than the target price, you will receive a bonus.\nLena Goodwin's goal: Unknown\nConversation Starts:\n\nTurn #0: Lily Greenberg said: \"Hello Lena, it's Lily here. I noticed you have an antique chair up for sale. It's quite lovely. What can you tell me about its history?\"\n\nTurn #1: Lena Goodwin said: \"Hello Lily, it's great to hear from you. This antique chair indeed has a thrilling story. It was originally owned by a local established artist who is known for his exquisite carpentry skills. He crafted this chair in the late 1800s, showcasing his signature detailed carvings. Besides its aesthetic appeal, it has remained in pretty good condition but might need a new seat cushion. I hope this piece could find a new life in your home, enjoying being part of beautiful moments. I've put it out for $15, but I'm open to some negotiation. Let me know what you think.\"\n\nTurn #2: Lily Greenberg said: \"Thank you for sharing that history, Lena. The chair shows remarkable craftsmanship. Considering it needs a new seat cushion, which is another investment, would you consider letting it go for $9? This would help me take up the necessary refurbishing while also preserving the chair's original essence.\"\n\nTurn #3: Lena Goodwin said: \"I understand your concerns connected with the additional investment, Lily. I value the fact that you appreciate the essence of the chair and want to preserve it. As a show of good faith, would you consider a settlement at $10, splitting the difference?\"\n\nTurn #4: Lily Greenberg said: \"You've made a fair proposal, Lena. I'm glad we managed to find some common ground in this negotiation. I accept the $10 offer. It's important to me that this chair keeps adding value to someone's life, just as it did in the past.\"\n\nTurn #5: Lena Goodwin said: \"Fantastic, Lily. It's a joy to know that the chair will continue its history with someone who values its craftsmanship and story. Shall we proceed to discuss the logistics of payment and delivery?\"\n\nTurn #6: Lily Greenberg said: \"Absolutely, Lena. Let's move on to the payment and delivery details. I'm grateful we could reach an agreement that respects the value of the chair.\"\n\nTurn #7: Lena Goodwin said: \"I'm glad too, Lily. To make things easier regarding payment, I'll send you an invoice through email. As for delivery, I offer porch pickup from my residence. If that doesn't work for you, we can discuss other options. How does that sound?\"\n\nTurn #8: Lily Greenberg said: \"That sounds perfectly reasonable, Lena. An invoice through email works great and I'm more than happy to pick up the chair from your porch. I'll look forward to your email and we can coordinate the pickup. Thank you for this smooth transaction.\"\n\nTurn #9: Lena Goodwin said: \"You're welcome, Lily. I am also glad that everything went so smoothly. I'll send you the invoice shortly. Thanks again for your understanding and appreciation of the chair's history and craftsmanship. Looking forward for the chair to begin its new chapter under your custodianship!\"\n\nTurn #10: Lily Greenberg said: \"Wonderful, Lena. I'm equally thrilled about this new chapter in the chair's history. I appreciate your efficiency and look forward to receiving the invoice. Thank you again for this pleasant transaction.\"\n\nTurn #11: Lena Goodwin said: \"I'm very glad to hear that, Lily. I'll get the ball rolling on the invoice and you'll receive it shortly in your email. Do not hesitate to reach out if you have any concerns or further questions. Thank you again.\"\n\nTurn #12: Lily Greenberg said: \"That works well for me, Lena. Looking forward to receiving the invoice. I'll reach out if any further questions come up. Thank you!\"\n\nTurn #13: Lena Goodwin said: \"It's been a pleasure dealing with you, Lily. I'll be sure the invoice gets to you promptly. Thank you for giving the chair a new home. Do have a wonderful day!\"\n.\nYou are at Turn #14. Your available action types are\n\"none action speak non-verbal communication leave\".\nNote: You can \"leave\" this conversation if 1. you have achieved your social goals, 2. this conversation makes you uncomfortable, 3. you find it uninteresting/you lose your patience, 4. or for other reasons you want to leave.\n\nPlease only generate a JSON string including the action type and the argument.\nYour action should follow the given format:\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"description\": \"An interface for messages.\\nThere is only one required method: to_natural_language\", \"properties\": {\"action_type\": {\"title\": \"Action Type\", \"description\": \"whether to speak at this turn or choose to not do anything\", \"enum\": [\"none\", \"speak\", \"non-verbal communication\", \"action\", \"leave\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"argument\": {\"title\": \"Argument\", \"description\": \"the utterance if choose to speak, the expression or gesture if choose non-verbal communication, or the physical action if choose action\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"action_type\", \"argument\"]}\n```\u001b[0m\n", "input": "", "output": "{'action_type': 'speak', 'argument': \"It was a pleasure dealing with you as well, Lena. I'll anticipate the invoice in my email. Take care and have a splendid day too!\"}"}] \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/llm_rl/data/dataset_info.json b/llm_rl/data/dataset_info.json index 5220a297..47116cd8 100644 --- a/llm_rl/data/dataset_info.json +++ b/llm_rl/data/dataset_info.json @@ -1,4 +1,8 @@ { + "sotopia_no_slide_no_filter_format_sft": { + "file_name": "fastchat-ft-gp4-gpt4-easy-truncated.json", + "file_sha1": "" + }, "fastchat-sft": { "file_name": "fastchat-ft-gp4-gpt4-easy-truncated.json", "file_sha1": "" diff --git a/llm_rl/finetune-mistral-7b.sh b/llm_rl/finetune-mistral-7b.sh index 24723185..013a1598 100644 --- a/llm_rl/finetune-mistral-7b.sh +++ b/llm_rl/finetune-mistral-7b.sh @@ -1,18 +1,17 @@ deepspeed src/train_bash.py \ --stage sft \ --model_name_or_path mistralai/Mistral-7B-v0.1 \ - --dataset dummy_convs \ + --dataset sotopia_no_slide_no_filter_format_sft \ --dataset_dir ./data/ \ - --val_size 0.1 \ --cutoff_len 4096 \ --template llama2-sotopia \ --wandb_project "llama-factory-sft" \ --wandb_tags "['mistral-7b']" \ --use_fast_tokenizer False \ --do_train \ - --num_train_epochs 15.0 \ - --per_device_train_batch_size 8 \ - --gradient_accumulation_steps 8 \ + --num_train_epochs 5.0 \ + --per_device_train_batch_size 1 \ + --gradient_accumulation_steps 32 \ --finetuning_type lora \ --lora_target q_proj,v_proj \ --learning_rate 5e-5 \ @@ -21,7 +20,7 @@ deepspeed src/train_bash.py \ --warmup_ratio 0.03 \ --quantization_bit 4 \ --quantization_type nf4 \ - --double_quantization \ + --double_quantization True \ --flash_attn True \ --gradient_checkpointing True \ --bf16 True \ @@ -30,9 +29,6 @@ deepspeed src/train_bash.py \ --output_dir ./mistral-7b-sft_cache \ --overwrite_output_dir \ --logging_steps 1 \ - --evaluation_strategy "steps" \ - --per_device_eval_batch_size 32 \ - --eval_accumulation_steps 32 \ --save_strategy "epoch" \ --save_total_limit 5 \ --use_auth_token True \ @@ -41,6 +37,10 @@ deepspeed src/train_bash.py \ --deepspeed ./deepspeed_config_s2.json # --dataset alpaca_gpt4_en \ + # --val_size 0.1 \ + # --evaluation_strategy "steps" \ + # --per_device_eval_batch_size 32 \ + # --eval_accumulation_steps 32 \ # --lora_rank 8 \ # --lora_alpha 16 \ # --lora_dropout 0.05 \ \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/llm_rl/preprocess/create_sft_data.py b/llm_rl/preprocess/create_sft_data.py index b50ca7c5..6d2785ad 100644 --- a/llm_rl/preprocess/create_sft_data.py +++ b/llm_rl/preprocess/create_sft_data.py @@ -22,6 +22,6 @@ def join_json_files(directory_path): joined_data.append(new_data) return joined_data -joined_data = join_json_files("./GPT4-4_Redis_Easy_No_Slide/") -with open("../data/GPT4-4_Redis_Easy_No_Slide.json", "w") as f: +joined_data = join_json_files("./GPT4-4_Redis_Easy_No_Slide_No_Filter_Format/") +with open("../data/GPT4-4_Redis_Easy_No_Slide_No_Filter_Format.json", "w") as f: json.dump(joined_data, f) \ No newline at end of file